.
CANADA
\
\
NATIONAL LIBRARY
BIBLIOTHEQUE NATIONALE
A DICTIONARY
OF
MUSIC AND MUSICIANS
DICTIONARY
OF
MUSIC AND MUSICIANS
(A.D. 1450—1883)
BY EMINENT WRITERS, ENGLISH AND FOREIGN.
WITH ILLUSTRATIONS AND WOODCUTS.
EDITED BY
SIR GEORGE GROVE, D.C.L.
DIEECTOE OF THE ROYAL COLLEGE OF MUSIC.
IN FOUR VOLUMES.
VOL. III.
MACMILLAN AND CO.
1883.
[ The Right of Translation and Reproduction is reserved. ]
OXFORD:
E. PIOKAED HALL, M.A., AND J. H. STACY,
PRINTERS TO THE UNIVERSITY.
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS.
SIR JULIUS BENEDICT
JOSEPH BENNETT, ESQ. . . J- •**.
JAMES R. STEENDALE-BENNETT, ESQ.
DAVID BAPTIE, ESQ., Glasgow
MRS. WALTER CARR .... M. C. (
WILLIAM CHAPPELL, ESQ., F.S.A. . . W. C.
ALEXIS CHITTY, ESQ. ...... A. C.
M. GUSTAVE CHOUQUET, Keeper of the Museum of the Con
servatoire de Musique, Paris
ARTHUR DUKE COLERIDGE, ESQ., Barrister-at-Law . . A. D. C,
FREDERICK CORDER, ESQ., Mendelssohn Scholar, 1875-79 ..
GEORGE ARTHUR CRAWFORD, Major . . . . . . G. A. C.
WILLIAM H. CUMMINGS, ESQ. . . . . . . . • • • W. H. C.
W. G. CUSINS, ESQ., late Conductor of the Philharmonic
Society; Master of the Music to the Queen W. G. C.
EDWARD DANNREUTHER, ESQ. . . . . . . . . • • E. D.
HERR PAUL DAVID
JAMES W. DAVISON, ESQ. . . . . . . . . J. W. D.
HARRY COLLINS DEACON, ESQ. . . . . . . H. C. D.
EDWARD H. DONKIN, ESQ.
H. SUTHERLAND EDWARDS, ESQ. . . . . . . . . H. S. E.
HENRY FREDERICK FROST, ESQ., Organist of the Chapel Eoyal, Savoy H. F. F.
J. A. FULLER-MAITLAND, ESQ. .. .. .. .. .. J. A. F.-M.
JOHN T. FYFE, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . J. T. F.
CHARLES ALLAN FYFFE, ESQ., Barrister-at-Law . . . . C. A. F.
DR. FRANZ GEHRING, Vienna . . . . . . . . . . F. G.
J. C. GRIFFITH, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . J. C. G.
REV. THOMAS HELMORE, Master of the Children of the Chapels Royal
WILLIAM HENDERSON, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . W. H.
GEORGE HERBERT, ESQ.
vi LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS.
DR. FERDINAND HTLLER, Cologne . . . . . . . . H.
A. J. HIPKINS, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . A. J. H.
EDWARD JOHN HOPKINS, ESQ., Organist to the Temple . . E. J. H.
REV. CANON PERCY HUDSON . . . . . . . . . . T. P. H.
FRANCIS HUEFFER, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . F. H.
JOHN HULLAH, ESQ., LL.D. . . . . . . . . . . J. H.
WILLIAM H. HUSK, ESQ., Librarian to the Sacred Harmonic Society W. H. H.
F. H. JENKS, ESQ., Boston, Mass., U. S. A. . . . . . . F. H. J.
JAMES LECKY, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . J. L.
HENRY ,T. LINCOLN, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . H. J. L.
STANLEY LUCAS, ESQ., late Secretary to the Philharmonic Society S. L.
HERCULES MAC!)ONNELL, ESQ. . . . . . . . . H. M. D.
SlR GEORGE ALEXANDER MACFARREN, MllS. Doc., Professor of
Music in the University of Cambridge, &c., &c. . . G. A. M.
CHARLES MACKESON, ESQ., F.S.S. . . . . . . . . C. M.
HERR A. MACZEWSKI, late Concert-director, Kaiserslautern . . A. M.
JULIAN MARSHALL, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . J. M.
MRS. JULIAN MARSHALL .. .. .. .. .. F. A. M.
RUSSEL MARTINEAU, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . R. M.
SIGNOR GIANNANDREA MAZZUCATO . . . . . . . . G. M.
REV. JOHN HENRY MEE, Mus. Bac., M.A. . . . . . . J. H. M.
Miss LOUISA M. MIDDLETON . . . . . . . . . . L. M. M.
EDWIN G. MONK, ESQ., Mus. Doc., Organist of York Cathedral E. G. M.
SIR HERBERT S. OAKELEY, Mus. Doc., Professor of Music in the
University of Edinburgh . . . . . . . . H. S. 0.
REV. SIR FREDERICK A. GORE OUSELEY, BART., Mus. Doc., Professor
of Music in the University of Oxford . . . . . . F. A. G. O.
C. HUBERT H. PARRY, ESQ., Mus. Doc. . . . . . . C. H. H. P.
HERR ERNST PAUER . . . . . . . . . . . . p.
EDWARD JOHN PAYNE, ESQ., Barrister-at-Law. . .. .. E. J. P.
REV. HUGH PEARSON, late Canon of Windsor . . H. P.
EDWARD H. PEMBER, ESQ., Q.C. E. H. P.
Miss PHILLIMORE C. M. P.
HERR C. FERDINAND POHL, Librarian to the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde, Vienna . . . . . . C. F. P.
WILLIAM POLE, ESQ., F.R.S., Mus. Doc W. P.
VICTOR DE PONTIGNY, ESQ. . . V. DE P.
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS. vii
EBENEZER PKOUT, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . E. P.
REV. WILLIAM PULLING . . . . . . . . . . "W. Pg.
CHAELES H. PURDAY, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . C. H. P.
EDWARD F. RIMBAULT, ESQ., LL.D. . . . . . . . . E. F. R.
LUIGI RICCI, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . L. R.
W. S. ROCKSTRO, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . W. S. R.
DESMOND LUMLEY RYAN, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . D. L. R.
CARL SIEWERS, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . C. S.
DR. PHILIPP SPITTA, Berlin ; Professor in the University ; Se
cretary to the Royal Academy of Arts ; and Managing-
Director of the Royal High-School for Music.. .. P. S.
W. BARCLAY SQUIRE, ESQ. .. .. .. .. .. W. B. S.
JOHN STAINER, ESQ., Mus. Doc., Oxon . . . . . . J. S.
H. H. STATHAM, ESQ. . . . . . . . . . . . . H. H. S.
SIR ROBERT P. STEWART, Mus. Doc., Professor of Music in Dublin
University . . . . . . . . . . . . R. P. S.
T. L. STILLIE, ESQ., Glasgow . . . . . . . . T. L. S.
WILLIAM H. STONE, ESQ., M.D. . . . . . . . . W. H. S.
SIR ARTHUR SEYMOUR SULLIVAN, Mus. Doc., late Principal of the
National Training School of Music . . . . . . S.
FRANKLIN TAYLOR, ESQ. F. T.
ALEXANDER W. THAYER, ESQ., United States Consul, Trieste,
Author of the Life of Beethoven .. .. .. A. W. T.
Miss BERTHA THOMAS . . . . . . . . . . . . B. T.
C. A. W. TROYTE, ESQ. C. A. W. T.
COLONEL H. WARE, Public Library, Boston, Mass., U. S. A. H. W.
MRS. EDMOND WODEHOUSE A. H. W.
J. Mum WOOD, ESQ., Glasgow J. M. W.
THE EDITOR GK
29 Bedford Street, Covent Garden,
July, 1883.
DICTIONARY
MUSIC AND MUSICIANS.
PLANCHE, JAMES ROBINSON, of French de
scent, born in London Feb. 27, i 796 ; made Eouge
Croix Pursuivant of Arms 1854, and Somerset
Herald 1866 ; died in London, May 30, 1880.
Mr. Planches many dramas and extravaganzas
do not call for notice in these pages ; but he
requires mention as the author of the librettos
of ' Maid Marian, or the Huntress of Harlingford,
an Historical Opera/ for Bishop (Covent Garden,
Dec. 3, 1822), and'Oberon, or The Elf-King's
Oath, a Romantic and Fairy Opera,' for Weber
(Covent Garden, April 12, 1826). In 1838 he
also wrote for Messrs. Cliappell a libretto founded
on the Siege of Calais by Edward III., with a
view to its being set by Mendelssohn. Mendels
sohn however was not satisfied with the book,
and it was ultimately transferred to Mr. Henry
Smart, by whom a large portion was composed.
The correspondence between Mendelssohn and
Planche may be read in the Autobiography of
the latter (1872 ; chap. 21). [G.]
PLANQUETTE, ROBERT, born in Paris,
July 31, 1850 ; passed rapidly through the
Conservatoire, and first appeared as a composer
of songs and chansonettes for the Cafes -concerts.
Encouraged by the popularity accorded to the
bold rhythm and slightly vulgar melody of these
songs, he rose to operettas, — 'Valet de cour,'
' Le Serment de Mme. Grdgoire,' and ' Paille
d'avoine.' The decided progress evinced by this
last piece was confirmed by ' Les Cloches de
Corneville,' a 3-act operetta, produced with im
mense success at the Folies dramatiques on
April 19, 1877, adapted to the English stage by
Farnie and Reece, and brought out at the Folly
Theatre, London, Feb. 23, 1878, with equally
extraordinary good fortune. Planquette has
since composed and published ' Le Chevalier
Gaston,' i act (Monte Carlo, Feb. 8, 1879), and
'Les Voltigeurs de la 32me.' 3 acts (Theatre
de la Renaissance, Jan. 7, 1880). It is to be
hoped that he will aim higher than he has
VOL. III. FT. I.
hitherto done, and add refinement to his un
doubted gift of melody. [G. C.]
PLANTADE, CHARLES HENRI, born at Pon-
toise, Oct. 14, 1764; was admitted at 8 to the
school of the king's ' Pages de la musique,' where
he learned singing and the cello. On leaving this
he studied composition with Honore Langle" (born
at Monaco, 1741, died at Yilliers leBel, 1807), a
popular singing-master, the pianoforte with Hull-
mandel (born at Strassburg, 1751, died in London,
1823), an excellent teacher, and the harp, then a
fashionable instrument, from Petrini (born in
1744, died in Paris, 1819). Having started as a
teacher of singing and the harp, he published a
number of romances, and nocturnes for 2 voices,
the success of which procured him admission to the
stage, for at that time the composer of ' Te bien
aimer, 0 ma chere Zelie,' or some such simple
melody, was considered perfectly competent to
write an opera. Between I791 a]Qd 1815 Plan-
tade produced a dozen or so dramatic works,
three of which, ' Palma, ou le voyage en Grece,'
2 acts (1798), ' Zoe, ou la pauvre petite' (1800),
and 'Le Mari de circonstance' (1813), I act each,
were engraved. The whole of this fluent but in
sipid music has disappeared. His numerous
sacred compositions are also forgotten ; out of
about a dozen masses, the ' Messe de Requiem '
alone was published, but the Conservatoire has
the MS. of a 'Te Deum' (1807), several motets,
and 5 masses. From these scores it is evident
that with an abundance of easy-flowing melody,
Plantade had neither force nor originality. He
had a great reputation as a teacher, was a
polished man of the world, and a witty and bril
liant talker. Queen Hortense, who had learned
singing from him, procured his appointment as
Maitre de Cbapelle to her husband, and also as
professor at the Conservatoire (i 799) . He gave up
his class in 1807, but resumed it in 1815; was dis
missed on April 1, 1816, reinstated Jan. I, 1818,
and finally retired in 1828. He was decorated
2 PLANTADE.
with the Legion of Honour by Louis XVIII.
in 1814. His best pupil was the celebrated
Mme. Cinti-Damoreau. He died in Paris, Dec. 18,
1839, leaving two sons, one of whom, CHAKLES
FRANCIS, — born in Paris April 14, 1787, died
March 25, 1870, — composed numerous chansons
and chansonnettes, some of which have been
popular. [G.C.]
PLAYFORD, JOHN, stationer, bookseller, mu-
sicseller and publisher, is commonly said to have
been born in 1613. He was really born in 1623,
as is evidenced by portraits taken at various
dates on which his age is stated. He carried on
business ' at his shop in the Inner Temple, near
the Church door.' In middle life, probably from
about 1663 to 1679, he had a house at Islington,
where his wife kept a ladies' school, and after
wards, from 1680, resided 'in Arundel Street,
near the Thames side, over against the George.'
His first musical publications were issued in
1652, and comprised Hilton's 'Catch that catch
can,' ' Select Musicall Ayres and Dialogues,' and
* Musick's Recreation on the Lyra Violl.' On
Oct. 29, 1653, he was chosen clerk of the Tem
ple Church. In 1654 he published his 'Breefe
Introduction to the Skill of Musick for Song and
Viall.' Of that impression but one copy is now
known, which was for many years in the posses
sion of the late Dr. Rimbault, and produced 10
guineas at the sale of his library in 1877. In
1655 Playford published an enlarged edition of
it, which long passed as the first. It is divided
into two books, the first containing the principles
of music, with directions for singing and playing
the viol ; the second the art of composing music
in parts, by Dr. Campion, with additions by
Christopher Sympson. The book acquired great
popularity; in 1730 it reached its I9th edition,
independent of at least six intermediate unnum
bered editions. There are variations both of the
text and musical examples, frequently extensive
and important, in every edition. In the loth edi
tion, 1683, Campion's tract was replaced by 'A
brief Introduction to the Art of Descant, or compos
ing Music in parts,' without author's name, which
in subsequent editions appeared with considerable
additions, by Henry Purcell. The 7th edition
contained, in addition to the other matter, * The
Order of performing the Cathedral Service, ' which
was continued, with a few exceptions, in the
later editions. Five different portraits of the au
thor, taken at various periods of his life, occur in
the several editions. In 1 66 7 Playford republished
Hilton's ' Catch that catch can,' with extensive
additions and the second title of ' The Musical
Companion,' and a second part containing ' Dia
logues, Glees, Ayres, and Ballads, etc. ' ; and in
1672 issued another edition, with further addi
tions, under the second title only. Some com
positions by Playford himself are included in this
work. In 1671 he edited 'Psalms and Hymns
in solemn musick of four parts on the Common
Tunes to the Psalms in Metre : used in Parish
Churches ' ; and a few years later, ' The Whole
Book of Psalms, with the .... Tunes .... in
three parts,' which passed through many editions.
PLEYEL.
In 1673 he took part in the Salmon and Lock
controversy, by addressing a letter to the former,
' by way of Confutation of his Essay, etc.,' which
was printed with Lock's 'Present Practice of
Musick Vindicated.' The style of writing in this
letter contrasts very favourably with the writings
of Salmon and Lock. In place of abuse we have
quiet argument and clear demonstration of the
superiority of the accepted notation. Playford
published the greater part of the music produced
in his day, besides reprints of earlier works. His
last publication appears to have been the sth book
of 'Choice Ayres and Dialogues/ published in
1684-5, in tne Preface to which he says that age
and infirmity compel him to leave his business to
his son and Carr, the publisher's son. He died
in 1693 or 94. In his will (made in 1686, proved
Aug. 14, 1694) he expresses fear that owing to
' losses and crosses ' his estate will disappoint the
expectations of those who succeed him. His
burial-place has eluded all inquiry. [See Musio-
PRINTING, vol. ii. p. 435.]
HENRY, his second, but eldest surviving son,
born May 5, baptized May 14, 1657, had for
godfathers Henry Lawes and Henry Playford.
He succeeded to his father's business in 1685 in
partnership with Robert, son of John Carr, music
publisher at the Middle Temple Gate, and one
of the King's band of music. Their first publica
tion was ' The Theater of Music,' 1685. After a
few years Henry Playford removed to the Tem
ple Change, Fleet Street, and carried on business
alone. In 1698 he advertised a lottery of music
books. He published several important musical
works, among which were Purcell' s ' Ten Sonatas,'
and ' Te Deum and Jubilate for St. Cecilia's day,'
1697; 'Orpheus Britannicus,' 1698-1702; and
Blow's 'Ode on the Death of Purcell,' 1696, and
'Amphion Anglicus,' 1700. In 1703 he issued
proposals for publishing monthly collections of
songs and instrumental music by an annual sub
scription of one guinea. He resided in his father's
house in Arundel Street, and is supposed to have
died about 1710, but the precise date cannot be
ascertained.
JOHN, the youngest child of John Playford,
baptized at Islington Oct. 6, 1665, was a printer
of music. About 1 68 1 he entered into business
with Anne, widow of William Godbid, of Little
Britain, and with her, and afterwards alone,
printed several of the publications of his father.
He died early in 1686. An elegy on his death,
by Nahum Tate, with music by Henry Purcell,
was published in 1687. [W.H.H.]
PLEAS ANTS, THOMAS, born 1648, became
about 1676 organist and master of the choristers
of Norwich Cathedral. He died Aug. 5, 1689,
and was buried in the cathedral. [W.H.H.]
PLEYEL, IGNAZ JOSEPH, a most prolific instru
mental composer, born June I, 1757, the 24th
child of the village schoolmaster at Ruppersthal
in Lower Austria. His musical talent showed
itself early. He learnt to play the clavier and
violin in Vienna, the former from Van Hal, or
Wanhall, and found a patron in the then Count
Erdody, who put him under Haydn, as a pupil
PLEYEL.
in composition, in 1774. After remaining several
years with Haydn he went to Italy, where he
fully imbibed the taste of the Italian opera, and
lived in intercourse with the best singers and
composers. In 1783 he was called to Strassburg
as Capellmeister to the cathedral. In 1791 he
was invited to London to take the control of the
Professional Concerts of the following season.
He was probably not aware of the fact that his
appointment was a blow aimed at Salomon, and
that he would be in competition with Haydn.
The blow, however, missed its aim. Pleyel con
ducted his first Professional Concert Feb. 13,
1792. Haydn was present, and the programme
contained 3 symphonies, by Haydn, Mozart,
and Pleyel himself (composed expressly for the
concert). On May 14 he took his benefit. The
visit was a satisfactory one, both in an artistic
and a pecuniary point of view. On his return
to France he found himself denounced as an
enemy to the Republic, and was forced to fly.
He succeeded in clearing himself from the charge,
and at length settled in Paris as a music-seller.
In 1 800 the musicians of the opera proposed to
perform Haydn's 'Creation,' and Pleyel was
selected to arrange that Haydn should himself
conduct the performance. He got as far as
Dresden on the road to Vienna, but all the in
fluence of Haydn and Artaria failed to obtain
a pass for him any further, and the direction
of the performance came finally into the hands
of Steibelt. The evening of the concert — 3 Ni-
v6se, or Dec. 24, 1800 — was a memorable one,
since on his road to the opera house, in the Rue
Nicaise, Bonaparte nearly met his death from an
infernal machine. Pleyel was the first to publish
the complete collection of Haydn's quartets
(except the three last, of which two had not then
been printed, and the third was not composed
till some time afterwards). The edition, in sepa
rate parts only, has a portrait of Haydn by
Darcis after Guerin, and is dedicated to the First
Consul. It was followed by 30 quartets and 5
symphonies in score. In 1807 Pleyel founded
the pianoforte factory which has since become so
widely celebrated. [See PLEYEL & Co.] He died
Nov. 14, 1831.
Haydn considered Pleyel as his dearest and
most efficient pupil. He writes from London:
'Since his arrival (Dec. 23, 1791), Pleyel has
been so modest to me that my old affection has
revived ; we are often together, and it does him
honour to find that he knows the worth of his
old father. We shall each take our share of
success, and go home satisfied.' Pleyel dedicated
to Haydn his opera 2, six quartets ' in segno di
perpetua gratitudine.' When Pleyel's first six
string quartets, dedicated to his patron, Count
Ladislaus Erdody, appeared in Vienna, Mozart
wrote to his father (April 24, 1784): 'Some
quartets have come out by a certain Pleyel,
a scholar of Jos. Haydn's. If you don't already
know them, try to get them, it is worth your
while. They are very well written, and very agree
able ; you will soon get to know the author.
It will be a happy thing for music if, when the
PLEYEL. 3
time arrives, Pleyel should replace Haydn for
us.' This wish was not destined to be fulfilled.
In his later works Pleyel gave himself up to
a vast quantity of mechanical writing, vexing
Haydn by copying his style and manner without
a trace of his spirit, and misleading the public
into neglecting the works of both master and
scholar, including many of Pleyel's own earlier
compositions, which were written with taste and
care, and deserve a better fate than oblivion.
Pleyel was emphatically an instrumental com
poser, and wrote an enormous number of sym
phonies, concertanti, and chamber pieces, of
which a list will be found in Fe'tis, comprising
29 symphonies ; 5 books of quintets ; and 7 of
quartets, some of them containing as many as
1 2 compositions each ; 6 flute quartets ; 4 books
of trios ; 8 concertos ; 5 symphonies concertanti ;
8 books of duets for strings ; 10 books of sonatas
for PF. solo, and 12 sonatas for PF. and violin.
When in Italy he wrote an opera, 'Iphigenia
in Aulide,' which was performed at Naples.
A ' Hymn to Night,' probably a revolutionary
piece, was published by Andre^ at Offenbach in
1797- A series of 12 Lieder, op. 47, was pub
lished at Hamburg by Giinther and Bohme.
It has never yet been mentioned that his intro
duction to the world as a vocal composer was
with an opera for the Marionette theatre at
Esterha"z in 1 7 76, ' Die Fee Urgele,' containing
a quantity of vocal pieces. A portrait of him,
painted by H. Hardy and engraved by W.
Nutter, was published by Bland during Pleyel's
residence in London.
CAMILLE, eldest son of the foregoing, born at
Strassburg 1792, took over the music business in
1824, associating himself with Kalkbrenner for
the pianoforte department. He had had a good
musical education from his father and Dussek ;
he lived for some time in London, and published
several pieces which evince considerable talent.
He died at Paris May 4, 1855, leaving AUGUST
WOLFF at the head of the firm.
His wife, Marie Felicite" Denise Moke, known
as MADAME PLEYEL, was born at Paris, July 4,
1811, and at an early age developed an extraor
dinary gift for playing. Herz, Moscheles, and
Kalkbrenner, were successively her masters, and
she learnt much from hearing Thalberg ; but her
own unwearied industry was the secret of her
success. Her tourndes in Russia, Germany, Au
stria, Belgium, France, and England, were so
many triumphal progresses, in which her fame
continually increased. Mendelssohn in Leipzig,
and Liszt at Vienna, were equally fascinated by
her performances ; Liszt led her to the piano,
turned over for her, and played with her a duet
by Herz. Not less marked was the admiration
of Auber and Fe'tis, the latter pronouncing her
the most perfect player he had ever heard. In
this country she made her first appearance at
the Philharmonic, June 27, 1846, in Weber's
Concertstiick. To Brussels she always felt an
attraction, and in 1848 took the post of teacher
of the PF. in the Conservatorium there, which she
retained till 1872. Her pupils were numerous,
B 2
4 PLEYEL.
and worthy of her remarkable ability. She died
near Brussels, March 30, 1875. [C.F.P.]
PLEYEL & CO. This distinguished Parisian
firm of pianoforte-makers is now styled PLEYEL
WOLFF ET CIE., and from particulars supplied by
M. Wolff — formerly a pianist and professor at
the Conservatoire, and for many years head of
the house — its founder was Ignaz Pleyel, the
composer, who established it in 1807. The
Pleyel firm is remarkable for having always been
directed by musicians, such as Camille Pleyel,
who became his father's partner in 1821, and
Kalkbrenner, who joined them three years later.
At starting, the pianoforte-maker, HENRI PAPE,
lent valuable aid. The influence of Chopin, who
made his debut in Paris at Pleyel's rooms, in 1831,
has remained a tradition in the facile touch and
peculiar singing tone of their instruments. Camille
Pleyel was succeeded in the control of the business
by M. A. Wolff above mentioned, who has much
improved the Pleyel grand pianos in the direction
of power, having made them adequate to the
modern requirements of the concert room, with
out loss of those refined qualities to which we
have referred- The firm has had since 1876 an
agency in London. [A.J.H.]
PLICA (literally, a Fold, or Plait). A cha
racter, mentioned by Franco of Cologne, Joannes de
Muris, and other early writers, whose accounts
of it are not always very easily reconciled to each
other. Franco describes four kinds : (i) the 'Plica
longa ascendens,' formed by the addition, to a
square note, of two ascending tails, of which that
on the right hand is longer than that on the left ;
(2) the ' Plica longa descendens,' the tails of which
are drawn downwards, that on the right being,
as before, longer than that on the left ; (3) the
' Plica brevis aseendens,' in which the longer of
the ascending tails is placed on the left side ;
and (4) the ' Plica brevis descendens,' in which
the same arrangement obtains with the two de
scending tails.
1. 2. 3. 4.
•
n
B
.
Joannes de Muris describes the Plica as a
sign of augmentation, similar in effect to the
Point. Franco tells us that it may be added
at will to the Long, or the Breve ; but to the
Semibreve only when it appears in Ligature.
Some other writers apply the term ' Plica ' to
the tail of a Large, or Long. The Descending
Plica is sometimes identified with the Cephalicus,
which represents a group of three notes, whereof
the second is the highest. [See NOTATION, vol. ii.
pp. 467, 468.] [W.S.R.]
PLINTIVO, 'plaintive.' A direction in use
among the ' sentimental ' class of writers for the
pianoforte, of which, however,no specimen isfound
in the works of the great masters. [J.A.F.M.]
PLUS ULTRA. A sonata in Ab by Dussek
for pianoforte solo, op. 71. The motto 'Plus
Ultra ' appears to have been provoked by that of
WoelfTs sonata, NON PLUS ULTRA; but whether
PNEUMATIC ACTION.
it was affixed by the composer or by the pub
lishers is not certainly known ; probably by the
latter, as the work was first published in Paris,
to which Dussek had recently returned, with the
title ' Le Retour a Paris.' The title-pages of the
two works are as follows : —
' Non Plus Ultra. A Grand Sonata for the
Pianoforte, in which is introduced the favourite
Air Life let us Cherish, with Variations. Com
posed and dedicated to Miss E. Binny by J.
Woelfl. Op. 41. London : Printed and sold for
the author by J. Lavenu.'
' Plus Ultra. A Sonata for the Pianoforte,
composed and dedicated to Non Plus Ultra,*
by J. L. Dussek. Op. 71. London: Cianchetti
and Sperati.
* It alludes to a Sonata published under this title.*
The dates of publication of the two works are
probably 1800 and 1808 respectively. [G.]
PNEUMA (from the Greek irvevfjia, a breath
ing; Lat. Pneuma, velNeuma). Aform of Ligature,
sung at the end of certain Plain Chaunt Melo
dies, to an inarticulate vowel-like sound, quite
unconnected with the verbal text ; in which par
ticular it differs from the Perielesis, which is
always sung to an articulate syllable. [See LIGA
TURE ; PERIELESIS.]
The use of the Pneuma can be traced back to a
period of very remote antiquity — quite certainly
as far as the age of S. Augustine (350-430).
Since then, it has been constantly employed in the
Offices of the Roman Church ; more especially
at High Mass, on Festivals, in connection with
the Alleluia of the Gradual, from which it takes
its Tone, as in the following Alleluia (Tone i),
sung on Easter Sunday : —
Al - le -
Pneuma.
- - lu - - - - ia.
-^h
^ J •
The Alleluia is first sung twice by two Cantors,
and then repeated, in full Choir, with the ad
dition of the Pneuma, also sung twice through.
The two Cantors then intone the Versus, and the
Choir respond ; after which the Alleluia is again
sung by the Cantors, and the Pneuma by the Choir.
The Preface to the Ratisbon Gradual directs that
the Pneuma shall be sung upon the vowel A.
There is no connection between this kind of
Neuma and that described under NOTATION,
vol. ii. p. 467. [W.S.R.]
PNEUMATIC ACTION. A contrivance for
lessening the resistance of the keys, and other
moveable parts of an organ, previously attempted
by others, and brought into a practical shape by
CHAKLES S. BARKER between 1832 and 41, in
which latter year it was first applied by Cavaille'-
Coll to the organ of S. Denis. The necessity of
some such contrivance may be realised from the
fact that in some of the organs on the old sys
tem, a pressure of several pounds was required to
force down each key. In Willis's Organ at the
PNEUMATIC ACTION.
Alexandra Palace, London, if there were no
pneumatic levers, the resistance to the finger at
middle C with the couplers drawn would be 25 Ibs.
For a description of the invention see ORGAN,
vol. ii. p. 599. [&•]
POCO, a little ; rather ; as poco adagio, not
quite so slow as adagio itself; poco sostenuto,
somewhat sustained. It is the opposite of Assai.
POCHETTINO is a diminutive of poco and implies
the same thing but in a smaller degree. This is
a refinement of very modern invention. [G.]
PODATUS (Pedatus, Pes. A Foot, or Footed-
note). A form of Ligature, much used in Plain
Chaunt, and derived from a very antient Neuma,
which will be found figured at vol. ii. p. 467.
The Podatus consists of two notes, of which the
second is the highest ; and, in the square form of
Notation now in use, is represented thus —
Written. Sung.
The two notes may be of the same, or different
lengths ; but, as a general rule, the second note
is the longest, more especially when the Liga
ture ascends only one Degree. [See LIGATURE,
NOTATION.] [W.S.R.]
POELCHATJ, GEORG, a distinguished ama
teur, born July 5, 1773, at Cremon in Livonia,
left Russia during the reign of the Emperor Paul,
and settled in Hamburg, where he formed an
intimacy with Klopstock. On the death of Em
manuel Bach he bought the whole of his music,
which contained many autographs of his father's.
In 1813 he settled in Berlin, in 1814 became a
member of the Singakaclemie, and assumed the
charge of its library in 1833. At the request of
the Crown Prince he searched the royal libraries
for the compositions of Frederic the Great, and
found 1 20 pieces. He died in Berlin, on Aug. 12,
1836, and his collection, of music was bought by
the Royal Library and the Singakademie. In
1855 the Singakademie sold their collection of
the autographs of the Bach family to the Royal
Library, which now has a larger number of these
treasures than any other institution. There is a
bust of Poelchau in one of the rooms. [F.G.]
POHL, CARL FERDINAND, writer on musical
subjects, born at Darmstadt, Sept. 6, 1819, comes
of a musical family, his grandfather having been
the first maker of glass harmonicas, his father
(died 1869) chamber-musician to the Duke of
Hesse at Darmstadt, and his mother a daughter
, of the composer Beczwarzowsky. In 1841 he
settled in Vienna, and after studying under
Sechter became in 1849 organist of the new
Protestant church in the Gumpendorf suburb.
At this date he published Variations on an old
' Nachtwachterlied ' (Diabelli), and other pieces.
He resigned the post in 1855 on account of his
health, and devoted himself exclusively to teach
ing and literature. In 1862 he published in
Vienna an interesting pamphlet ' On the history
of the Glass harmonica.' From 1863 to 1866 he
lived in London, occupied in researches at the
British Museum on Haydn and Mozart ; the
POINT. 5
results of which he embodied in his ' Mozart und
Haydn in London,' 2 vols. ( Vienna, Gerold, 1867),
a work full of accurate detail, and indispensable
to the student. Through the influence of Jahn
and von Kochel, and of his intimate friend
the Ritter von Karajan, Mr. Pohl was appointed
in January 1866 to the important post of ar
chivist and librarian to the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde in Vienna. [See vol. i. 591.] To
his care and conscientiousness the present highly
satisfactory condition of the immense collections
of this great institution is due. In connection
therewith he has published two works, which,
though of moderate extent, are full of interest,
and are marked by that accuracy and sound
judgment which distinguish all Mr. Pohl's works,
namely, ' Die Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde und
ihr Conservatorium in Wien ' (Braumtiller, 1871),
and 'Denkschrift aus Anlass des 100 jahrigen
Bestehens der Tonkiinstler Societat in Wien'
(Gerold, 1871). He has been for many years
occupied on a biography of Haydn, which he un
dertook at the instigation of Jahn, and of which
vol. i. was published in 1875 (Berlin, Sacco ; since
transferred to Breitkopf & Hartel). The main
facts are contained in his article on Haydn in
this Dictionary (vol. i. 702-722). The summaries
of the musical events of each year which Mr.
Pohl furnishes to the ' Signale fur die musikalische
Welt/ of which he is the Vienna correspondent,
are most careful and correct, and it would be a
boon to the student of contemporary music if
they could be republished separately. Mr. Pohl's
courtesy to students desiring to collate MSS., and
his readiness to supply information, are well known
to the musical visitors to Vienna. [F. G.]
POHL, DR. RICHARD, a German musical critic
well known for his thoroughgoing advocacy of
Wagner. We learn from M. Pougin's supplement
to Fe"tis that he was born at Leipzig, Sept. 12,
1826, that he devoted himself to mathematics,
and after concluding his course at Gottingen
and Leipzig was elected to a professorial chair
at Gratz. This he vacated for political reasons,
and then settled at Dresden and Weimar as a
musical critic. He is one of the editors of the
'Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik,' and a frequent
contributor to the musical periodicals. He began
his Autobiography in the 'Mus. Wochenblatt'
for Dec. 30, 1880. [G.]
POINT or DOT (Lat. Punctus, vel Punctum ;
Ital. Punto ; Germ. Punct ; Fr. Point}. A very
antient character, used in mediaeval Music for
many distinct purposes, though its office is now
reduced within narrower limits.
The Points described by Zarlino and various
early writers are of four different kinds.
I. The POINT OF AUGMENTATION, used only
in combination with notes naturally Imperfect,
was exactly identical, both in form, and effect,
with the modern ' Dot ' — that is to say, it
lengthened the note to which it was appended
by one -half, and was necessarily followed by a
note equivalent to itself in value, in order to
complete the beat. The earliest known allu
sion to it is to be found in the ' Ars Cantus
6 POINT.
mensurabilis ' of Franco of Cologne, the analogy
between whose Tractulus, and the Punctus aug-
mentationis of later writers, is so close that the
two may be treated as virtually identical.
II. The POINT OF PERFECTION (Punctus Per-
fectionis) was used in combination with notes,
Perfect by the Time Signature, but rendered Im
perfect by Position, for the purpose of restoring
their Perfection. In this case, no short note
was needed for the purpose of compensation, as
the Point itself served to complete the triple
beat. Now, in mediaeval Music, a Breve, pre
ceded or followed by a Semibreve, or a Semi-
breve by a Minim, though perfect by virtue
of the Time Signature, becomes Imperfect by
Position. As the following example is written in
the Greater (or Perfect) Prolation, each of its
Semibreves is naturally equal to three Minims ;
but, by the rule we have just set forth, the
second and fourth notes become Imperfect by
Position — i. e. they are each equal to two Mi
nims only. The fourth note is suffered to remain
so, but the second is made Perfect by a Point of
Perfection.
Written.
The term 'Punctus Perfections ' is also applied
to the Point placed, by mediaeval Composers,
in the centre of a Circle, or Semicircle, in order
to denote either Perfect Time, or the Greater
Prolation.
III. The POINT OF ALTERATION, or Point of
Duplication (Punctus Alterationis, vel Punctus
Duplicationis), differs so much, in its effect, from
any sign used in modern Music, that it is less
easy to make it clear. In order to distinguish it
from the Points already described, it is sometimes
written a little above the level of the note to
which it refers. Some printers, however, so place
it, that it is absolutely indistinguishable, by any
external sign, from the Point of Augmentation.
In such cases it is necessary to remember that
the only place in which it can possibly occur is
before the first of two short notes, followed by a
longer one — or placed between two longer ones —
in Perfect Time, or the Greater Prolation ; that
is to say, in Ternary Rhythm, of whatever kind.
But its chief peculiarity lies in its action, which
concerns, not the note it follows, but the second
of the two short ones which succeed it, the value
of which note it doubles — as in the following
example, from the old melody, 'L'Homme arme,'
in which the note affected by the Point is dis
tinguished by an asterisk.
Written. *
Sung,
-A n j
rTj f^.
.,-)
1 — ^ *
POINT D'ORGUE.
IV. The POINT OF DIVISION, sometimes called
the Point of Imperfection (Punctus Divisionis,
vel Imperfectionis ; Divisio Modi), is no ^ less
complicated in its effect than that just described,
and should also be placed upon a higher level
than that of the notes to which it belongs, though,
in practice, this precaution is very often neg
lected. Like the Point of Alteration, it is only
used in Ternary Measure; but it differs from
the former sign, in being always placed be
tween two short notes, the first of which is
preceded, and the second followed, by a long one.
Its action is, to render the two long notes Im
perfect. But, a long note, in Ternary Rhythm,
is always Imperfect by Position, when either
preceded or followed by a shorter one : the use
of the Points, therefore, in such cases, is alto
gether supererogatory, and was warmly resented
by mediaeval Singers, who called all such signs
Puncti asinini.
Sung.
In spite, however, of its apparent complication,
the rationale of the Sign is simple enough. An
examination of the above passage will show that
the Point serves exactly the same purpose as the
Bar in modern Music ; and we can easily under
stand that it is called the Point of Division,
because it removes all doubt as to the division
of the Rhythm into two Ternary Measures.
The Composers of the I5th and i6th centuries
frequently substituted, for the Points of Aug
mentation, Alteration, and Division, a peculiar
intermixture of black and white notes, which
will be found fully described in vol. ii. pp.
472, 473 of this Dictionary; and the Student
will do well to make himself thoroughly ac
quainted with them, since, without a clear
understanding of these and other similar expe
dients, it is impossible to decipher Music, either
MS. or printed, of earlier date than the be
ginning of the 1 7th century. [W.S.R.]
POINT D'ORGUE, organ point, appears to
have two different meanings in French, and to be
used (i) for an organ point or pedal, that is, a
succession of harmonies carried over a holding
note [PEDAL] ; and (2), with what reason is not
plain, for the cadenza in a concerto — the flourish
interpolated between the chords of the 6-4 and
7-3 of the cadence — the place for which is indi
cated by a pause T\. Rousseau gives a clue to the
origin of the term by explaining (under ' Cou-
ronne') that when the above sign, which he de
nominates ' Couronne,' was placed over the last
note of a single part in the score it was then
called Point d'orgue, and signified that the sound
of the note was to be held on till the other parts
had come to the end. Thus the note so held on
became a pedal, and is so in theory. [G.]
POINTS.
POINTS. A term applied, in modern Music,
to the opening notes of the Subject of a Fugue,
or other important Motive, to which it is neces
sary that the attention of the Performer should
be particularly directed by the Conductor.
For instance, one of the most striking Subjects
in the ' Hallelujah Chorus,' is that adapted to the
words ' For the Lord God Omnipotent reigneth.'
After this has been twice enuntiated by the whole
body of Voices, in unison, the ' Point ' is taken
up at the 22nd Bar by the Sopranos, at the 25th
by the Tenors and Basses in unison, and at the
29th, by the Altos and Tenors. These, then, are
three of the most important 'Points' in the
Hallelujah Chorus.
The term ' Point' is also applicable to features
of quite another kind. Thus, the entrance of
the Horns in the First Movement of the Over
ture to ' Der Freischiitz,' and that of the First
Clarinet at the 6oth Bar of the Molto Vivace, are
' Points ' of such vital importance that a careless
reading on the part of their interpreters would
entirely fail to convey the Composer's meaning,
and render the performance spiritless and unin
teresting to the last degree.
These remarks concern, not only the performance
of Orchestral and Church Music. They apply,
with equal force, to Solo Performances of every
kind : to Pianoforte Sonatas, and Organ Fugues,
Violin Concertos, and Solos for the Flute or Oboe.
In these, the Performer, having no Conductor
to prompt him, must think for himself, and
the success of his performance will depend en
tirely upon the amount of his capacity for
doing so. [W.S.R.]
POISE, FERDINAND, born at Nlmes, June 3,
1828, as a child showed a turn for music, but was
only allowed to adopt it after taking his degree
as a bachelier-es-lettres of Paris. He entered the
Conservatoire in 1850, and in 1852 gained the
second prize for composition, under Adolphe
Adam, from whom he derived his taste for easy,
flowing melody. 'Bonsoir Voisin,' a pleasing
little opera produced at the Theatre Lyrique,
Sept. 18, 1853, was followed at the same theatre
by 'Les Charmeurs' (March 15, 1855), also a suc
cess. He next produced ' Polichinelle ' (1856) at
the Bouffes Parisiens ; and at the Opera Comique,
'Le Roi Don Pedre' 2 acts (1857) ; '^e Jar"
dinier Galant,' 2 acts (March 4, 1861); 'Les
Absents,' a charming piece in one act (Oct. 26,
1864) ; ' Corricolo ' 3 acts (Nov. 28, 1868) ; ' Les
trois Souhaits' (1873) ; 'La Surprise de 1' Amour,'
2 acts (Oct. 31, 1878); and 'L' Amour Me"decin'
(Dec. 20, 1880). The two last, arranged by Poise
and Monselet from Marivaux and Moliere, give a
high idea of his powers. He has also composed
another pretty little opera, 'Les deux Billets'
(1858), revived at the Athende in Feb. 1870.
In their ease and absence of pretension his works
resemble those of Adolphe Adam, but there the
comparison ends ; the latter had a real vein of
comedy, while Poise's merriment has the air of
being assumed to conceal his inward melancholy.
Nevertheless his music is flowing and happy;
and being well-scored, and never vulgar, it is
POLIUTO. 7
listened to with pleasure, and is remembered. It
would be more generally popular if M. Poise
exerted himself more ; but his health is delicate,
he lives in retirement, writes only when so dis
posed, and instead of aspiring to fame and fortune,
seeks only to secure his independence, and to en
joy the refined pleasures of music. [G.C.]
POLACCA (Italian for POLONAISE). Polac-
cas may be defined as Polonaises treated in an
Italian manner, but still retaining much of the
rhythm characteristic of their Polish origin. Po-
laccas are both vocal and instrumental, and are
generally of a brilliant and ornate description,
gaining in brilliancy what they lose in national
character. Thus Chopin, in a letter from War
saw, dated Nov. 14, 1829 (Karasowski, vol. i.),
speaks of an 'Alia Polacca' with cello accom
paniment that he had written, as ' nothing more
than a brilliant drawing-room piece — suitable for
the ladies,' and although this composition is pro
bably the same as the ' Introduction et Polonaise
Brillante pour Piano et Violoncello' (op. 3) in
C major, yet from the above passage it seems as
if Chopin did not put it in the same class as his
poetical compositions for the pianoforte which
bear the same name. [W.B.S.]
POLE, WILLIAM, Mus. Doc., F.E.S, an instance
of the successful union of science, literature, and
music. He was born at Birmingham in 1814, and
was bred to the profession of Civil Engineer
ing, in which he has become eminent. He has
written many works and papers on scientific sub
jects, and is a contributor to the leading Reviews,
and an F.R.S. of London and Edinburgh.
His taste for music developed itself early ; he
studied hard at both theoretical and practical
music, and was organist in a London West End
church for many years. He graduated at Oxford
as Mus. Bac. in 1860, and as Mus. Doc. in 1867.
He was appointed Reporter to the Jury on Mu
sical Instruments at the International Exhibition
of 1862, and is one of the Examiners for Musical
Degrees in the University of London, author of
a Treatise on the Musical Instruments in the
Exhibition of 1851, 'The Story of Mozart's Re
quiem,' 1879, 'The Philosophy of Music,' 1879,
and various minor critical essays, three of which,
written in 1858, on certain works of Mozart and
Beethoven have been mentioned in the article
ANALYSIS. His only musical compositions printed
are a well-known motet for 8 voices on the
' Hundredth Psalm,' and some four-handed PF.
accompaniments to classical songs. [G.]
POLIUTO. An opera in 3 acts ; the libretto
conceived by Adolphe Nourrit (who designed
the principal r6le for himself), and carried out
by Cammarano ; the music by Donizetti. It
was completed in 1838, but the performance was
forbidden by the Censure of Naples. It was
then translated into French by Scribe, and under
the title of 'Les Martyrs/ was produced at the
Grand Opdra (4 acts), April 10, 1840; at the
Theatre Italien, as 'I Martiri,' April 14, 1859;
in London, as ' I Martiri,' at the Royal Italian
Opera, April 20, 1852. [G.]
8
POLKA.
POLKA, a well-known round dance, said to
be of Bohemian origin. According to Alfred
Waldaw ('Bohmische Nationaltanze,' Prague,
1859 and I86o) the polka was invented in the year
1830 by a servant girl who lived at Elbeteinitz,
the music being written down by a local musician
named Neruda. The original name by which
the polka was known in its birthplace and in the
neighbourhood of Jicin, Kopidlno, andDimokury,
was the 'Nimra.' This was derived from the
song to which it was danced, the first lines of
which ran as follows :
Strejcek Nimra
Kou^il simla
Za pul p£ta tolaru.1
In 1835 it was danced in Prague, where it first
obtained the name of ' Polka,' which is probably
a corruption of the Czech ' pulka ' (half), a char
acteristic feature of the dance being its short half-
steps. According to another account the polka
was invented in 1834 by a native of Moksic, near
Hitschin in Bohemia, and was from that place in
troduced into Prague by students. In 1839 it was
brought to Vienna by the band of a Bohemian
regiment under its conductor, Pergler ; in 1840 it
was danced at the Ode'on in Paris by the Bohemian
Kaab ; and in 1844 ** found its way to London.
Wherever the polka was introduced, it suddenly
attained an extraordinary popularity. Vienna,
Paris, and London were successively attacked
by this curious ' polkamania ' ; clothes, hats, and
streets were named after the dance, and in Eng
land the absurdity was carried so far that public
houses displayed on their signs the ' Polka Arms.'
In the 'Illustrated London News' for March 23,
1844, will be found a polka by Offenbach, 'a,
celebrated French artiste,' headed by two rather
primitive wood-cuts, to which the following de
scription of the dance is appended : ' The Polka
is an original Bohemian peasant dance, and was
first introduced into the fashionable saloons of
Berlin and St. Petersburg about eight years
since.2 Last season it was the favourite at
Baden-Baden. The Polka is written in 2-4 time.
The gentleman holds his partner in the manner
shown in the engraving ; each lift first the right
leg, strike twice the left heel with the right
heel, and then turn as in the waltz' — a perform
ance which must have presented a rather curious
appearance. On April 13 the same paper, re
viewing a polka by Jullien, says : ' It is waste
of time to consider this nonsense. The weather
cock heads of the Parisians have been delighted
always by any innovation, but they never im
ported anything more ridiculous or ungraceful
than this Polka. It is a hybrid confusion of
Scotch Lilt, Irish Jig, and Bohemian Waltz, and
needs only to be seen once to be avoided for
ever ! ' In spite of this criticism the popularity
of the dance went on increasing, and the papers
of the day are full of advertisements professing
to teach * the genuine polka.' It was danced at
Her Majesty's Opera by Cerito, Carlotta Grisi,
1 Translation: 'Uncle Nimra bought a -white horse for five and a
half Thalers.'
2 If this is true, the dates of Waldau's account of the origin of the
dance can hardly be correct.
POLKA.
and Perrot, and the following was published as
' the much celebrated Polka Dance, performed at
Her Majesty's Theatre, by Carlotta Grisi and M.
Perrot, composed and arranged for the Pianoforte
by Alberto Sowinsky.'
Fine.
D.C.
Many ways of dancing the polka seem to have
been in use, and in order to settle all disputes
on the important matter, the 'Illustrated London
News ' on May 1 1 (having changed its opinions
since April) was 'much gratified in being enabled
to lay before its readers an accurate descrip
tion of the veritable, or Drawing-room Polka, as
danced at Almack's, and at the balls of the nobility
and gentry in this country.' According to this
description, which is accompanied by three very
amusing illustrations, the polka began with an
introduction (danced vis a vis), and consisted
of five figures. Of these, the 'heel and toe ' step,
which was the most characteristic feature of the
dance, has been quite abandoned, probably owing
to the difficulty in executing it properly, which
(according to 'Punch,' vol. vii. p. I723) gene
rally caused it to result in the dancers ' stamping
their own heels upon other people's toes.' The
account of the polka concludes as follows : ' In
conclusion we would observe that La Polka is
a noiseless dance ; there is no stamping of heels,
toes, or kicking of legs in sharp angles forward.
This may do very well at the threshold of a
Bohemian auberge, but is inadmissible into the
salons of London or Paris. La Polka, as danced
in Paris, and now adopted by us, is elegant,
graceful and fascinating in the extreme ; it is
replete with opportunities of showing care and
attention to your partner in assisting her through
its performance.' The rage for the polka did
not last long, and the dance gradually fell into
disuse in England for many years. It has how
ever recently come once more into vogue, but
the 'toe and heel' step has happily not been
revived with it.
The music of the polka is written in 2-4 time ;
according to Cellarius ('La Danse des Salons,'
Paris, 1847) the tempo is that of a military
march played rather slowly ; Maelzel's metro
nome, J = iO4. The rhythm is characterised by
the following 2-bar figures :
3 See also 'Punch,' vol. vi, for an admirable cartoon by Leech,
representing Lord Brougham dancing the polka with the woolsack.
POLKA.
3«
The music can be divided into the usual 8-bar
parts. In all early polkas the figure
9* 2.
& p p
p 1
^4 _
is found in the accompaniment of the 4th and
8th bars of these parts, marking a very slight
pause in the dance, but in recent examples this
pause has disappeared, owing to the dance being
performed somewhat faster, and more in the spirit
of a waltz or galop. The first polka which was
published is said to have been composed by Franz
Hilmar, a native of Kopildno in Bohemia. The
best national polkas are those by Labitzky, Lieb-
mann, Prochaska, Swoboda, and Titl. [W.B.S.]
POLLEDRO, GIOVANNI BATTISTA, an emi
nent violinist, was born at Piova" near Turin
June 10, 1781 (or according to another source
1776). He received his first instruction from local
musicians, at 15 studied for a short time under
Pugnani, and soon entered the royal band at
Turin. In 1804 ^e became first violin in the
Theatre at Bergamo, and after a short stay there
began to travel. In Russia he remained for
five years, and in 1814 accepted the appointment
of leader of the band at Dresden, where he
remained till 1824. In that year he accepted a
brilliant engagement as Director general of the
royal orchestra at Turin. He died at his native
village Aug. 15, 1853.
Polledro was an excellent violinist and sound
musician. He had the great tone and dignified
style of the classical Italian school. All con
temporaneous critics praise his faultless and
brilliant execution not less than the deep feel
ing with which he played. In 1812 he met
Beethoven at Carlsbad, and played with him
one of Beethoven's violin-sonatas (see Thayer's
Life of Beethoven, iii. 208). His published com
positions consist of three concertos, some airs
varies, trios and duos for stringed instruments,
and a set of exercises for the violin ; a Miserere
and a Mass for voices and orchestra, and a
Sinfonia pastorale for full orchestra. [P. D.]
POLLINI, FRANCESCO, born at Lubiano, in
Ulyria, in 1763 (1774 or 1778), and a pupil of
Mozart. He became a skilful pianist at an early
age, his style having combined some of the dis
tinguishing characteristics of that of his pre
ceptor, of dementi and of Hummel, each of whom
he surpassed in some forms of the mere mechan
ism of the art. Pollini indeed may, in this respect,
be considered as an inventor, having anticipated
Thalberg in the extended grasp of the keyboard
by the use of three staves (as in Thalberg's
Fantasia on 'God save the Queen,' and 'Rule
Britannia') — thus enabling the player to sustain
a prominent melody in the middle region of the
instrument, while each hand is also employed
with elaborate passages above and beneath it.
This remarkable mode of producing by two hands
POLO. 9
almost the effect of four, appears indeed to have
been ^originated by Pollini in his ' Uno de' tren-
tadue Esercizi in forma di toccata,' brought out in
1820. This piece was dedicated to Meyerbeer;
the original edition containing a preface ad
dressed to that composer by Pollini, which
includes the following passage explanatory of
the construction of the Toccata : — ' I propose to
offer a simple melody more or less plain, and
of varied character, combined with accompani
ments of different rhythms, from which it can be
clearly distinguished by a particular expression
and touch in the cantilena in contrast to the
accompaniment.' Dehn appears to have been the
first to draw attention to Pollini's specialty, in
his preface to the original edition of Liszt's
pianoforte transcriptions of the six great organ
Preludes and Fugues of Bach.
Pollini's productions consist chiefly of piano
forte music, including an elaborate instruction
book, many solo pieces, and some for two per
formers. These works are included in the
catalogue of Ricordi, of Milan. Pollini also
produced some stage music, and a Stabat Mater.
He was highly esteemed — professionally and
personally — by his contemporaries. Bellini de
dicated his ' Sonnarnbula' ' al celebre Francesco
Pollini.' The subject of this notice died at Milan
in April 1847. [H.J.L.]
POLLY, a Ballad-opera, written by John Gay
as a second part of his ' Beggar's Opera.' When
about to be rehearsed a message was received
from the Lord Chamberlain that the piece ' was
not allowed to be acted but commanded to be
suppressed,' the prohibition being supposed to
have been instigated by Sir Robert Walpole,
who had been satirised in ' The Beggar's Opera.'
Failing to obtain a reversal of the decree Gay
had recourse to the press, and in 1729 published
the piece in 4to., with the tunes of the songs,
and a numerous list of subscribers, by which he
gained at least as much as he would have done
by representation. Like most sequels, 'Polly'
is far inferior to the first part, and when in 1777
it was produced at the Haymarket theatre, with
alterations by the elder Colman, it was so un
successful that it was withdrawn after a few
representations. It was revived at the same
theatre June II, 1782, and again at Drury Lane
(for Kelly's benefit), June 16, 1813. [W.H.H.]
POLO or OLE, a Spanish dance accompanied
by singing, which took its origin in Andalusia.
It is said to be identical with the Romalis,
which is 'danced to an old religious Eastern
tune, low and melancholy, diatonic, not chro
matic, and full of sudden pauses, which are
strange and 'startling,' and is only danced by
the Spanish gipsies. It resembles the oriental
dances in being full of wild energy and contor
tions of the body, while the feet merely glide or
shuffle along the ground. The words (' coplas ')
of these dances are generally of a jocose char
acter, and differ from those of the Seguidilla
in wanting the ' estrevillo,' or refrain; several
i Walter Thornbury, 'Life in Spain.'
10
POLO.
examples of them may be found in Preciso's
'Coleccionde Las Mejores Coplasde Seguidillas,
Tirauas y Polos' (Madrid, 1816). They are
sung in unison by a chorus, who mark the time
by clapping their hands. Some characteristic
examples of the music of the Polo will be found in
J. Gansino's 'La Joya de Andalucia' (Madrid,
Bomero). [W.B.S.]
POLONAISE, a stately dance of Polish origin.
According to Sowinski (' Les Musiciens Polo-
nais ') the Polonaise is derived from the ancient
Christmas carols which are still sung in Poland.
In support of this theory he quotes a carol,
' W zlobie lezy,' which contains the rhythm and
close characteristic of the dance ; but the fact
that although in later times they were accom
panied by singing, yet the earliest Polonaises
extant are purely instrumental, renders it more
probable than the generally received opinion as
to their courtly origin is correct. According to
this latter view, the Polonaise originated under
the following circumstances. In 15 73, Henry III.
of Anjou was elected to the Polish throne, and
in the following year held a great reception at
Cracow, at which the wives of the nobles
marched in procession past the throne to the
sound of stately music. It is said that after
this, whenever a foreign prince was elected to
the crown of Poland the same ceremony was
repeated, and that out of it the Polonaise was
gradually developed as the opening dance at
court festivities. If this custom was introduced
by Henry III., we may perhaps look upon the
Polonaise, which is so full of stateliness, as the
survival of the dignified Pavans and Passomezzos
which were so much in vogue at the French
court in the I5th century. Evidence is not
wanting to prove that the dance was not always
of so marked a national character as it assumed
in later times. Book vii. of Be~sard's ' The
saurus Harmonious Divini Laurencini Romani'
(Cologne 1603) consists of * Selectiores aliquot
chorese quas Allemande vocant, germanico saltui
maxime accomodatee, una cum Polonicis aliquot
et aliis ab hoc saltationis genere haud absimi-
libus,' and these ' chorese Polonicse ' (which are
principally composed by one Diomedes, a natural
ised Venetian at the court of Sigismund III.) ex
hibit very slightly the rhythm and peculiarities of
Polish national music. During the 1 7th century,
although it was no doubt during this time that
it assumed the form that was afterwards destined
to become so popular, the Polonaise has left no
mark upon musical history, and it is not until
the first half of the iSth century that examples
of it begin to occur.1 In Walther's Lexicon
(1732) no mention is made of it, or of any Polish
music ; but in Mattheson's ' Volkommener Ca-
pellmeister' (1739) we ^^ ^ (as *ne author
himself tells us) described for the first time.
Mattheson notices the spondaic character of the
i In the Koyal Library at Berlin there is preserved a MS. volume
•which bears the date 1725, and formerly belonged to Bach's second
wife, Anna Magdalena. In it are six Polonaises, written in the
owner's autograph ; but it is improbable that they are all of Se
bastian Bach's composition.
POLONAISE.
rhythm, and remarks that the music of the Polo
naise should begin on the first beat of the bar :
he gives two examples (one in 3-4, the other
in common time) made by himself out of the
chorale ' Ich ruf ' zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ.' At
this time the Polonaise seems suddenly to have
attained immense popularity, probably owing to
the intimate connexion between Saxony and
Poland which was caused by the election (1733)
of Augustus III. to the Polish throne. In 1 742-
43 there was published at Leipzig a curious
little collection of songs entitled, ' Sperontes
Singende Muse,' which contains many adapta
tions of Polish airs : in the following example
(from the second part of the work) some of the
peculiarities of the Polonaise may be traced.
i^=S
rf
* •
w
Deine Blicke Sind die Stricke, All - er - an - ge
nehmstes Kind, Die die Liebe so bezwingend nicht
Nimmt mehr Herzen ein, Als des Mo - gols Macht
Volk an sich gebracht, TJnd der grOsste Feldherr und Sol - dat.
Noch zur Zeit jemals be - zwungen hat.
From this time the Polonaise has always been
a favourite form of composition with instru
mental composers, and has not been without
influence on vocal music, especially in Italian
opera. [SeePoLACCA.] Bach wrote two Polonaises
(orchestral Partita in B minor, and French Suite,
No. 6), besides a 'Polacca' (Brandenburg Con
certos, No. i, Dehn); and there are also ex
amples by Handel (Grand Concerto, No. 3, in
E minor), Beethoven (op. 89, Triple Concerto, and
Serenade Trio, op. 8), Mozart ('Kondeau Polo
naise,' Sonata in D minor), Schubert (Polonaises
for 4 hands), Weber (op. 21, and the Polacca
Brillante, op. 72), Wagner (for 4 hands, op. 2),
as well as by the Polish composers Kurpinski
and Ogniski, and above all by Chopin, under
whose hands it reached what is perhaps the
highest development possible for mere dance-
forms. Attracted by its striking rhythmical capa
bilities, and imbued with the deepest national
sympathy, Chopin animated the dry form of the
old Polonaise with a new and intensely living
spirit, altering it as (in a lesser degree) he
altered the Waltz and the Mazurka, and chang
ing it from a mere dance into a glowing tone-
POLONAISE.
POLSKA.
11
picture of Poland, her departed glory, her many
wrongs, and her hoped-for regeneration. Kara-
sowski (Life of Chopin, vol. ii.) divides his
Polonaises into two classes. The first (which
includes those in A major, op. 40, No. i ; F$
minor, op. 44, and Ab major, op. 53) is charac
terised by strong and martial rhythm, and may
be taken to represent the feudal court of Poland
in the days of its splendour. The second class
(including the Polonaises in Cjf minor and
Eb minor, op. 26 ; in C minor, op. 40, No. 2 ;
in D minor, Bb major and F minor, op. 71) is
distinguished by dreamy melancholy, and forms
a picture of Poland in her adversity. The
Fantaisie Polonaise (Ab major, op. 61) is dif
ferent in character to both classes, and is said
to represent the national struggles ending with
a song of triumph.
As a dance, the Polonaise is of little interest :
it consists of a procession in which both old and
young take part, moving several times round the
room in solemn order. It does not depend upon
the execution of any particular steps, although
it is said to have been formerly danced with
different figures, something like the English
country dances. It still survives in Germany,
and is danced at the beginning of all court balls.
In Mecklenburg a sort of degenerate Polonaise
is sometimes danced at the end of the evening ;
it is called ' Der Auskehr' ('The Turn-out'),
and consists in a procession of the whole com
pany through the house, each person being armed
with some household utensil, and singing in
chorus ' Un as de Grotvare de Grotmoder nahm.'
[See GROSSVATEK TANZ.]
The tempo of the Polonaise is that of a march,
played between Andante and Allegro : it is
nearly always written in 3-4 time,1 and should
always begin on the first beat of the bar. It
generally consists of two parts, sometimes fol
lowed by a trio in a different key ; the number
of bars in each part is irregular. The chief
peculiarity of the Polonaise consists in the strong
emphasis falling repeatedly on the half-beat of
the bar, the first beat generally consisting of a
quaver followed by a crotchet (see the Polo
naise given below). Another peculiarity is
that the close takes place on the third beat,
often preceded by a strong accent on the second
beat. The last bar should properly consist of
four semiquavers, the last of which should fall on
the major seventh, and be repeated before the
concluding chord, thus :
:p==!=
The accompaniment generally consists of quavers
and semiquavers in the following rhythm :
r r r r
The following example, although not conforming
entirely with the above rules, is nevertheless
interesting as a genuine Polonaise danced and
i Mattheson says it may be written in common time.
sung at weddings in the district of Krzeszowice
in Poland at the present day.
'
Poja 7 lem sobie nieprzeplacona, Ksiedza plebana
ryf^f , | J j JpJb
|CJ ^_tJ4-i— ug
siostrg rodgona. Dal ci mi tyle da tyle wiana, ocipke sloniny
i wiaz kg siana. Moji sa siedzi osadz cie lepiej.
niechze mi choc da zagonek rzepy.2
The notes printed in small type are variations
of the tune which are performed in some dis
tricts. [W.B.S.]
POLONINI, ENTIMIO, a singer who began
his career in England April 13, 1847, a^ Covent
Garden as Eaimondo in 'Lucia,' with fair suc
cess, and displayed ' a very sonorous voice which
told well in the concerted music.'3 He next
played, May 8, De Fiesque, on the production
in England of Donizetti's 'Maria di Bob an,'
Fiorello ('II Barbiere'), Antonio ('Le Nozze')
etc. 'He has a fine bass voice and sings like
a thorough musician.'4 For the space of 21
years he sang at the Royal Italian Opera, and
proved of great service in small but not altogether
unimportant parts, besides the above, such as,
Masetto, II Ministro (Fidelio), Melcthal, Mathi-
sen (Prophete)' Alberto (La Juive), Borella
(Masaniello) etc., and occasionally in those of
more importance, with success, viz. Orbazzano
and Alidoro, on the revivals of ' Tancredi,' ' La
Cenerentola/ Leporello, St. Bris, etc. The rest of
the year he was engaged either at Paris, or St.
Petersburg, etc. The enumeration of his parts is
sufficient to show that Signer Polonini, in addition
to his good qualities as a singer, was a versatile
actor. He was characterised by Mr . Chorley as ' one
of the most valuable artists of a second class ever
possessed by a theatre.' He has for some years
retired from public life. A son of his, ALES-
SANDRO, a baritone, has appeared in Italy and
elsewhere. [A.C.]
POLSKA, a national Swedish dance, popular
in West Gothland, something like a Scotch reel
in character. Polskas are usually written in
minor keys, although they are occasionally found
in the major. The example which is given below
(' Neckens Polska ') is well known, as Ambroise
2 Translation:—! have taken for my wife the reverend Parson's
own sister. He gave me as her marriage portion a piece of bacon and
a bundle of hay. My neighbours, what do you think ? The fellow
has refused to give me even a little plot of land sown with turnips.
J ' Musical World,' April 17, 1847. 4 Ib. Aug. 21, 1847.
12
POLSKA.
Thomas has introduced it in Ophelia's mad scene
in 'Hamlet.' Other examples will be found in
Ahlstrom's ' Walda Svenska Folksanga ' (Stock
holm, 1850).
•*-*-
[W.B.S.]
POLYEUCTE. Opera in 5 acts ; the words
(founded on Corneille's tragedy) by Barbier and
Carre', the music by Gounod. Produced at the
Opera, Paris, October 7, 1878. The name is the
same as POLIUTO. [G,]
^ POLYPHONIA (Eng. Polyphony, from the
Gr. TTO\.VS, many, </>o>i/7), a voice). A term ap
plied, by modern Musical Historians, to a cer
tain species of unaccompanied Vocal Music, in
which each Voice is made to sing a Melody
of its own; the various Parts being bound
together, in obedience to the laws of Counter
point, into an harmonious whole, wherein it is
impossible to decide which Voice has the most
important task allotted to it, since all are
equally necessary to the general effect. It is in
this well-balanced equality of the several Parts
that Polyphonia differs from Monodia ; in
which the Melody is given to one Part only,
while supplementary Voices and Instruments
are simply used to fill up the Harmony. ("See
MONODIA.]
The development of Polyphony from the first
rude attempts at Diaphonia, Discant, or Orga-
num, described by Franco of Cologne, Guido
d'Arezzo, and others, was so perfectly natural,
that, notwithstanding the slowness of its progress,
we can scarcely regard the results it eventually
attained in any other light than that of an in
evitable consequence. The first quest of the
Musicians who invented < Part -Singing ' was
some method of making a Second Voice sing
notes which, though not identical with those of
the Canto fermo, would at least be harmonious
with them. While searching for this, they dis
covered the use of one Interval after another,
and employed their increased knowledge to so good
purpose, that, before long, they were able to assign
to the Second Voice a totally independent Part.
It is true, that, to our ears, the greater number of
their progressions are intolerable ; less, however,
because they mistook the character of the Inter
vals they employed, than because they did not
POLYPHONIA.
at first understand the proper method of using
them in succession. They learned this in course
of time ; and, discarding their primitive Sequences
of Fifths and Fourths, attained at last the power
of bringing two Voice parts into really harmoni
ous relation with each other. The rate of their
progress may be judged by the two following
examples, the first of which is from a MS. of
the end of the nth or beginning of the I2th
century, in the Ambrosian Collection at Milan ;
and the second, from one of the I4th, in the Paris
Library.
(i) llth or 12th cent.
(2)
yi h o
1
|(1V :>
r^
3
22 <^
3
VSl/
^iJ
^^)
J
Mi - ra le -
ge,
mi - ro mo - do, De
-US
*Y
"• i O
f-^
-' - (j &
1
1
1 —
3 —
\\
i
B"
f^ •
£?
for -
mat
"T" "^ :s:
ho - mi - nem.
c-i '^ F-* "^ H
-+-« —
1 H
II
Now, in both these cases, the two Parts are equally
melodious. There are no long chains of reiterated
notes, merely introduced, as Guido would have
introduced them, for the purpose of supporting
the Melody upon a Pedal-Point : but, each Part
has its own work to do ; and it cannot fairly be
said that one is more important than the other.
[See ORGANTJM.] Equal care was taken to pre
serve an absolutely independent Melody, in each
several Part, when, at a later period, Composers at
tempted the production of Motets, and other similar
works, in three and four Parts. We find no
less pains bestowed upon the Melody of the Tri-
plum,1 in such cases, than upon that of the
Tenor, or Motetus ; and very rarely indeed does
the one exhibit more traces of archaic stiffness
than the other. The following example from
a Mass composed by Guillaume de Machault
for the Coronation of Charles V, in the year
1364, shews a remarkable freedom of Melody —
for the time — in all the Parts.
A Triplum.
f\ (~\ J
4b-U_
»^ Motetus. M
Et
in
TgTg-^
Contratenor.
^§1 ^^
pax.
t— ^^"^
1 That is, the Third Part— whence our English word, Treble. The
Fourth Part was sometimes called Quadruplum, and the 'Fifth
Quincuplum. The principal part, containing the Canto fermo was
sometimes called Tenor, and sometimes Motetus. The term Contra-
tenor was applied to the part which lay nearest the Tenor, whether
immediately above, immediately below, or exactly of equal compass
with it. This part was also frequently called Medius.
POLYPHONIA.
POLYPHONIA.
13
b
! i
IT i i
1 J
5C p— ^
J • • J
^ • •
1
<ZJ tl 9 m
ii ~ • . I-TI
>in -
jfgf
1XT31—
J I !
-0 ^ •
—V5><--
s*< « '
• .— — j hZi
\- k"1
b
|
1 i i 1
b
^ * • J
J
i i i
CG3 3CZ22
-s>-
- nse vo -
~&r&"&"F~
Ib 1 Ib '
lun - ta - tis.
] J J
f^i
Lau - damus Te, etc.
>TJ £? >T3 . —
^-^ *--i i
S B£ * . s:
& P & P
|C5 1- • «
Rude as this is, it manifests a laudable de
sire for the attainment of that melodious motion
of the separate Parts, which, not long after the
death of its Composer, became the distinguishing
characteristic of mediaeval Music. With all their
stiffness, and strange predilection for combina
tions now condemned as intolerable, we cannot
but see that the older writers did their best to
provide every Singer with an interesting Part.
Nevertheless, true Polyphony, was not yet in
vented. For that, it was necessary, not only
that every Voice should sing a melodious strain ;
but, that each should take its share in the
elucidation of one single idea, not singing for
itself alone, but answering its fellow Voices, and
commenting, as it were, upon the passages sung
by them. In other words, it was necessary that
every voice should take up a given Subject,
and assist in developing it into a Fugue, or
Canon, or other kind of composition for which
it might be best suited. This was the one
great end and aim of true Polyphony; and,
for the practical realisation of the idea, we are
undoubtedly indebted to the Great Masters of
the early Flemish School, to whose ingenuity
we owe the invention of some of the most attrac
tive forms of Imitation and Fugal Device on re
cord. The following quotation from a ' Chanson
a trois voix' by one of the earliest of them,
Antonius Busnois, who is known to have been
employed as a Singer in the Chapel of Charles
the Bold, Duke of Burgundy, in the year 1467,
will serve to shew the enormous strides that Art
was making in the right direction.
Triplum.
y ' .y—
i 1 1 r
1 )
^ — f
Tenor.
:):,(* ^.
suis venut vers mon
' £-. r~^> F^\ f-f - ^ ]£
Je suis
^ b v — — -^-
Contratenor.
1 1
* m^
ve - nut vei
— ~^ ^^~ f^
s a mon a -my etc.
Here we see a regular Subject started by the
lenor, and answered by the Triplurn, note for
note, with a clearness which at once shews the
unity of the Composer's design. When this stage
was reached the Polyphonic School, may be said
to have been fairly established ; and it only re
mained to bring out its resources by aid of the
genius of the great writers who practised it. The
list of these Masters is a long one ; but certain
names stand out before all others, as borne by men
whose labours have left an indelible impression
upon the Schools to which they belonged. Of
these men, Guillaume Dufay was one, and Ocken-
heim another; but the greatest genius of the I5th
century was undoubtedly Josquin des Prds, the in
genuity of whose contrupuntal devices has never
been exceeded. Uberto Waelrant, Jacques Arch-
adelt, and Adrian Willaert, wrote in simpler
form, but bequeathed to their successors an
amount of delicate expression which was turned
to excellent account by their scholars in Italy.
Their gentler fervour was eagerly caught up
by Costanzo Festa, Giovanni Croce, Luca Ma-
renzio, and a host of others whos.e talents were
scarcely inferior to theirs ; while, facile prin-
ceps, Palestrina rose above them all, and clothed
Polyphony with a beauty so inimitable, that
his name has been bestowed upon the School as
freely as if he had lived in the 1 5th century to
inaugurate it.
A careful study of the works of this great
writer will shew that, when regarded from a
purely technical point of view, their greatest
merit lies in the strictness with which the Poly
phonic principle has been carried out, in their
development. Of course, their real excellence
lies in the genius which dictated them : but,
setting this aside, and examining merely their
mechanical structure, we find, not only that
every Part is necessary to the well-being of the
whole, but, that it is absolutely impossible to say
in which Part the chief interest of the Com
position is concentrated. In this respect, Pales
trina has carried out, to their legitimate con
clusion, the principles we laid down in the
beginning of our article, as those upon which
the very existence of Polyphony depended. It
would seem impossible that Art could go beyond
this ; and, in this particular direction, it never has
gone beyond it. It is impossible, now, even to
guess what would have happened had the Poly
phonic School been cultivated, in the 1 7th
century, with the zeal which was brought to
bear upon it in the i6th. That it was not so
cultivated is a miserable fact which can never be
sufficiently deplored. Palestrina died in 1594;
and, as early as the year 1600, his work was
forgotten, and its greatest triumphs contemned
as puerilities. Monteverde sapped the founda
tions of the School by his contempt for contra
puntal laws. Instrumental Accompaniment was
substituted for the ingenuity of pure vocal
writing. The Choir was sacrificed to the Stage.
And, before many years had passed, the Poly
phonic School was known no more, and Monodia
reigned triumphant. Happily, the laws to which
Palestrina yielded his willing obedience, and to
the action of which his Music owes so much of
14
POLYPHONIA.
its outward and technical value, are as well
understood now as in the days in which he
practised them. There is, therefore, no reason
why the practice of the purest Polyphony should
not, some day, be revived among us. We see
but little promise of such a consummation at the
present moment; but it is something to know
that it is not impossible. [W.S.R.]
POMPOSO, 'pompously,' is used by Schumann
in the Humoreske, op. 20, for pianoforte. He
marks the last movement but one ' Mit einigem
Pomp,' or 'Un poco pomposo.' Handel had
employed the term a century before in the first
movement of the overture to Samson. It is also
used by Sterndale Bennett as the title of the trio
in the Symphony G- minor, op. 43. [J.A.F.M.]
PONCHIELLI, AMILCAKE, was born at
Paderno Fasolaro, Cremona, Sept. I, 1834. In
Nov. 1843 he entered the Conservatorio of Milan,
and remained there till Sept. 1854. Two years
afterwards, on Aug. 30, 1856, he was able to
produce at the Concordia at Cremona his first
opera, ' I promessi Sposi.' His next were ' La
Savojarda,' Cremona, Jan. 19, 1861 ; 'Roderico,'
Piacenza, 1864 ; and ' La Stella del Monte,'
in 1867. Hitherto Signor Ponchielli's reputa
tion had been confined to the provinces; but in
1872 he was fortunate enough to find an oppor
tunity of coming before the general public at
the opening of the New Theatre ' Dal Verme '
at Milan, where his 'Promessi Sposi' was per
formed Dec. 5. He rewrote a considerable por
tion of the opera for the occasion, and its success
was immediate and complete. The managers
of the theatre of ' La Scala ' at Milan at once
commissioned him to write a ballet, ' Le due
Gemelle/ which was produced there Feb. 1873,
received with frantic enthusiasm, and immedi
ately published (Ricordi). This was followed
by a ballet, ' Clarina' (Dal Verme, Sept. 1873) ;
a (' Scherzo ' or comedy, ' II parlatore eterno '
' Lecco, Oct. 18, 1873); and a piece in 3 acts,
' I Lituani,' given with immense success at the
Scala, March 7, 1874. In the following year he
wrote a cantata for the reception of the remains
of Donizetti and Simone Mayr at Bergamo, a
work of some extent and importance, which was
performed there Sept. 13, 1875. On April 8,
1876, he produced a new opera at the Scala
called ' Gioconda,' with the same success as
before; and on Nov. 17, 1877, he gave at the
'Dal Verme,' the scene of his first triumph, a
3-act piece called 'Lina,' which was a r6chauff&
of his early opera ' La Savojarda,' and does not
appear to have pleased. His last opera, ' II
Figliuol prodigo,' was produced at the Scala,
Dec. 26, 1880, with astonishing success.
Signor Ponchielli is married to Teresina Bram-
billa, a singer, and a member of the musical
family of that name. He enjoys a position
in Italy second only to Verdi, whose successor
he is universally regarded as being. Out of
Italy his works have as yet hardly begun to
penetrate. In England, the ' Danze delle Ore,'
some brilliant and elegant ballet music from his
PONS.
' Gioconda,' played at the Crystal Palace, Oct. 25,
1879, and a selection from 'Le due Gemelle,'
also played at the Crystal Palace, Nov. 5, 1880,
are probably the only productions of his that have
been heard in public.
The above notice is indebted to Paloschi's ' An-
nuario ' and Pougin's Supplement to Fe*tis. [G.]
PONIATOWSKI, JOSEPH MICHAEL XAVIER
FRANCIS JOHN — nephew of the Prince Poniatow-
ski who was a marshal of the French army and died
in the battle of Leipzig, Oct. 19, 1812, and whose
portrait was found by Mendelssohn at Wyler1
inscribed ' Brinz Baniadofsgi ' — Prince of Monte
Rotondo, born at Rome, Feb. 20, 1816. He
devoted himself so entirely to music that he can
hardly be called an amateur. He regularly
attended the musical classes at the Lyce'e at
Florence, and also studied under Ceccherini. He
made his de*but at the Pergola, Florence, as a
tenor singer ; produced his first opera, ' Giovanni
da Procida' — in which he sang the title role — at
Lucca in 1838, and from that time for more than
30 years supplied the theatres of Italy and Paris
with a large number of operas. After the Revo
lution of 48 he settled in Paris as plenipotentiary
of the .Grand Duke of Tuscany, and was made
Senator under the Empire. After Sedan he fol
lowed his friend Napoleon III. to England, pro
duced his opera 'Gelmina' at Covent Garden,
June 4, 1872, his operetta * Au travers du mur'
at St. George's Hall, June 6, 1873, and selections
from his Mass in F at Her Majesty's Theatre,
June 27, 1873, and died July 3 of the same year.
He was buried at Chislehurst.
His operas are 'Giovanni da Procida' (Florence
and Lucca 1838); 'Don Desiderio' (Pisa 1839,
Paris 1858); 'Ruy Bias' (Lucca 1842); 'Boni-
fazio' (Rome 1844); 'I Lambertazzi' (Florence
1845) ; ' Malek Adel' (Genoa 1846) ; ' Esmeralda'
(Leghorn 1847); 'La Sposa d'Abido' (Venice
1847); 'Pierre de' Medicis' (Paris 1860); 'Au
travers du mur' (Ibid. 1861); ' L' A venturier '
(Ibid. 1865); 'La Contessina' (Ibid. 1868).
His music evinces much melody and knowledge
of the voice, considerable familiarity with stage
effect, fluency and power of sustained writing
— everything in short but genius and indivi
duality. His manners were remarkably simple
and affable, and he was beloved by all who knew
him. [G.C.]
PONS, JOSE, a Spanish musician, born at
Gerona, Catalonia, in 1768. He studied under
Balins, chapel-inaster at Cordova. Pons was
chapel-master of the cathedral of his native town,
a post which he left for that at Valentia, where he
died in 1818. He is distinguished for his Vilhan-
cicos or Christmas pieces, a kind of oratorios for
voices with orchestra or organ, which are said to
be still extensively performed in his own country.
He wrote also Misereres for the Holy Week.
Eslava (Liro Sacro-hispana iv.) gives a 'Letrida'
of his, ' 0 madre, ' for 8 voices, and characterises
him as the typical composer of the Catalan school,
as opposed to that of Valencia. [G.]
i Letter, Aug. 9, 1831.
PONTE.
PONTE, LORENZO DA,1 the elegant poet who
wrote the words for three of Mozart's operas —
Figaro, Don Giovanni, and Cosl fan tutte — was
born at Ceneda, in the Venetian States, March
10, 1749. He borrowed his name from a bishop,
his benefactor, but was the child of very poor
parents, and was left without any education
till he was fourteen. He was then allowed to
enter the Seminary of his native town, and after
studying five years went to Venice to seek his
fortune by the aid of his pen. In this gay city,
the home of theatres and every kind of pleasure,
he had a number of amorous adventures, and
was at last obliged to escape to Treviso, where he
was appointed professor of rhetoric. But having
spoken against the government of the Republic,
he was ordered to leave. He then took refuge
in Vienna, where Salieri2 presented him to the
Emperor Joseph II., who made him court poet in
place of Metastasio recently deceased. Here, not
withstanding the difference of their characters, he
became an intimate friend of Mozart, and wrote
the libretti for the three operas above named.
Michael Kelly, then in Vienna, says3 that he was
a great coxcomb, supposed to be originally a Jew
who had turned Christian and dubbed himself
an abbe". After the death of the Emperor, Feb.
•20, I79°> he was obliged to quit Vienna, and at
Trieste married an English lady. Finding no
prospect of permanent employment in Austria,
he took his wife to Paris in August 1792. Bat
Paris was then too stormy for him, and he soon
left for London. Here he became a favourite
teacher of the Italian language, and was ap
pointed poet to the Italian Opera, then under
Taylor's management. As part of his duty he
travelled in Italy in 1798* in search of singers.
In 1 80 1 he took a part of Domenico Corri's music
shop to sell Italian books, but this soon ended in
pecuniary difficulties. He was in the habit of
getting bills discounted for Taylor, and was im
prudent enough to endorse them, thus making
himself liable for several thousand pounds. As
Taylor was not accustomed to pay his debts,
Da Ponte naturally got into great difficulties,
and his only resource was to join his wife at
New York. So on March 5, i8o3,5 this strange
man sailed for America, and after a miserable
passage of 86 days arrived at Philadelphia en
route to New York. Here he was unsuccessful
as a dealer in tea, tobacco, and drugs, but became
a great favourite as professor of Italian. In 1 8 1 1
he wenttoSunbury (Pennsylvania) to manufacture
liqueurs, but as usual lost his money, and returned
to his pupils at New York. He now began to
feel the weight of years and the disrepute into
which his conduct had brought him, when in
1826 Manuel Garcia arrived with his family
in New York. Though they had never met, Da
1 -In his autobiography (' Memorie di L. da Ponte,' New York 1829-30)
he spells his name thus, and so do all other writers, except M. de la
Chavanne, his translator ('Memoires de L. d'Aponte,' Paris 1860).
2 P. Scudo, in his charming account of Da Ponte and society in
Venice in the 18th century (' Critique et Litte'rature Musicales,' Paris
1856), says Sarti, but Da Ponte in his autobiography says Salieri.
3 'Reminiscences,' London 1826.
* Date in Meyer's 'Grosses Conversations Lexicon,' Hilburghausen
1850.
5 Mendel, ' Musikalisches Conversations Lexicon,' says 1805.
POPPER.
15
Ponte rushed to Garcia's lodgings, and announced
himself as ' Da Ponte, author of the libretto of
Don Giovanni, and the friend of Mozart.' Garcia
embraced the poet, singing 'Fin ch' han dal
vino,' and ultimately the opera was performed
at New York, Garcia playing the part of Don
Giovanni, and his daughter (afterwards Madame
Malibran) that of Zerlina. This was the last
happy day for Da Ponte. He died at New York
August 17, 1838, aged 89, neglected and in the
deepest misery. [V. de P.]
PONTICELLO (Ital. for the bridge of a
stringed instrument) or ' STJL PONTICELLO ' — a
term indicating that a passage on the violin,
tenor, or violoncello, is to be played by crossing
the strings with the bow close to the bridge. In
this way the vibration of the string is partially
stopped, and a singular hissing sound produced.
It occurs in solo pieces as well as in concerted
music. The closing passage of the Presto, No. 5
of Beethoven's Quartet in Cfl minor, op. 131, is a
well-known instance. [P-D.]
PONTIFICAL CHOIR. See SISTINB CHOIR.
POOLE, ELIZABETH, a very favourite English
actress and mezzo-soprano singer, born in London
April 5, 1820, made her first appearance in a
pantomime at the Olympic Theatre in 1827, and
continued for some years to play children's parts —
Duke of York to Kean's Richard; Albert to
Macready's Tell ; Ariel, etc. In 1834 she came
out in opera at Drury Lane, as the Page in
'Gustavus'; in 1839 visited the United States
and sang in ' Sonnambula ' and other operas ;
in 1841 was engaged by Mr. Bunn for his English
operas at Drury Lane. Here she sang many
parts, especially Lazarillo in 'Maritana.' At
the same time her ballads and songs were highly
popular at concerts, both in London and the Pro
vinces. Miss Poole appeared at the Philhar
monic, June 15, 1846. She was a leading singer
in the operas brought out at the Surrey Theatre
by Miss Homer, in 1852, where she sang in ' The
Daughter of the Regiment, "Huguenots, 'etc., and
was also much engaged by Charles Kean, F. Chat-
terton, and German Reed. Miss Poole (then Mrs.
Bacon) retired from public life in 1870, and is still
living. She was a clever, indefatigable, artist,
always to be relied upon. Her voice was good,
extensive, and very mellow and sympathetic in
quality ; her repertoire in opera was very large,
and in English songs and ballads she had no
rival. Her portrait is preserved in the collection
of the Garrick Club. [G.]
POOLE, Miss. See DICKONS, MBS., vol. i.
p. 444 6.
POPPER, DAVID, born June 18, 1846, at
Prague, in the Conservatorium of which place he
received his musical education. He learnt the
violoncello under Goltermann, and soon gave
evidence of the possession of a remarkable talent.
In 1863 he made his first musical tour in Ger
many, and quickly rose to very high rank as
a player. In the course of the journey he met
von Billow, who was charmed with his playing,
16
POPPER.
POKPOPvA.
performed with him in public, and induced Prince
Hohenzollern to make him his ' Kammervirtuos.'
Popper afterwards extended his tour to Holland,
Switzerland, and England. At the festival
conducted by Liszt at Carlsruhe in 1 864, he was
allowed to be the best of all the solo-players. In
1867 he played for the first time in Vienna,
where he was made first solo-player at the Hof-
oper, a post, however, which he resigned after a
few years, that he might continue his concert
tours on a great scale. His tone is large and full
of sentiment ; his execution highly finished, and
his style classical. His compositions are eminently
suited to the instrument, and are recognised as
such by the first living cello-players. His most
popular pieces are the Sarabande and Gavotte
(op. 10), Drei Stiicke (op. n), and a Concert
Polonaise (op. 28). [C.F.P.]
Early in 1872 Popper married Fraulein SOPHIE
MENTER, a very distinguished pianoforte-player,
daughter of Joseph Menter the cellist, who was
born at Munich July 29, 1848, and after a
childhood of great precocity entered the Munich
Conservatorium under Professor Leonhard. At
1 3 she left that establishment for private tuition
under Niest, and at a later period under Liszt ;
in her 1 5th year took her first artistic tournie ;
in 1867 appeared at the Gewandhaus, Leipzig,
and has since taken her place throughout Ger
many as one of the great players of the day. [G.]
POPULAR ANCIENT ENGLISH MUSIC.
The classical work on this subject is1 entitled
' Popular Music of the Olden Time : a Collection
of the Ancient Songs, Ballads, and Dance Tunes,
illustrative of the National Music of England.
With short introductions to the different reigns,
and notices of the Airs from writers of the 1 6th
and 1 7th centuries. Also a Short Account of the
Minstrels. By W.Chappell,E.S.A. The whole of
the airs harmonized by G . A. Macfarren. London:
Cramer, Beale and Chappell.' The foundation of
the above work was published in 1838-40 under
the title of 'A Collection of National English Airs,
consisting of Ancient Songs, Ballads and Dance
Tunes, interspersed with remarks and anecdote,
and preceded by an Essay on English Minstrelsy.
The Airs harmonized for the Pianoforte, by W.
Crotch, Mus. Doc., G. Alex. Macfarren, and J.
Augustine Wade. Edited by W. Chappell.' This
work contains 245 tunes, and was out of print
in about 14 years time from the date of its pub
lication. The 'Popular Music' was published
in 17 parts (2 large 8vo. volumes, and 797 pages)
and contains more than 400 airs with five fac
similes of music and two copious Indexes. The
following are the headings of the chapters : —
VOL. I.
Minstrelsy from the Saxon pe
riod to the reign of Edward I.
Music of the Middle Ages, and
Music in England to the end of
the 13th century.
English Minstrelsy from 1270 to
1480, and the gradual extinction
of the old minstrels.
Introduction to the reigns of
Henry VII., Henry VIH., Edward
VI., and Queen Mary.
Songs and Ballads of the reigns
of Henry VII., Henry VIII., Ed
ward VI., and Queen Mary.
Introduction to the reign of
Queen Elizabeth.
Songs and Ballads of the reign of
Queen Elizabeth.
Introduction to the reign of
James I.
Songs and Ballads of the reigns
of James 1. and Charles I.
i The title has been somewhat modified In later editions.
VOL. n.
Conjectures as to Eobin Hood.
Ballads relating to the adven
tures of Kobin Hood.
Puritanism in its effect upon
Music and its accessories ; and In
troduction to the Commonwealth
Period.
Songs and Ballads of the Civil
War, and of the time of Cromwell.
Introduction
Charles II.
to the reign of
Songs and Ballads from Charles
II. to William and Mary.
Bemarks onAnglo-Scotch Songs.
of Anglo - Scotch
Introduction to the reigns of
QueenAnne, George I., and George
II.
Songs and Ballads of the reigns
of Queen Anne, George I., and
George II.
Traditional Songs of uncertain
date.
Keligious Christmas Carols.
Appendix, consisting of addi
tions to the Introductions, and of
further remarks upon the tunes
included in both volumes.
Characteristics of National Eng
lish Airs, and summary.
[W.B.S.]
Specimens
Songs.
PORPORA, NiccoLA,1 or NICCOLO, ANTONIO,
composer and celebrated teacher of singing, was
born at Naples August 19, 1686. His father, a
bookseller with a numerous family, obtained ad
mission for him at a very early age to the Con-
servatorio of S. M. di Loreto, where he received
instruction from Gaetano Greco, of Venice, Padre
Gaetano of Perugia, and Francesco Mancini, all
former pupils of the same school. His first opera
was 'Basilio, re di Oriente,' writtenfor the theatre
' de' Fiorentini.' On the title-page of this work
he styles himself 'chapel-master to the Portu
guese Ambassador.' The opera of 'Berenice,'
written in 1710 for the Capranica theatre at
Rome, attracted the notice and elicited the com
mendation of Handel. It was followed by 'Flavio
Anicio Olibrio' (1711) ; by several masses, mo
tets and other compositions for the church ; by
'Faramondo' (1719) and 'Eumene' (1721), on
the title-page of which last work he calls him
self ' Virtuoso to the Prince of Hesse Darmstadt.'
Having been appointed master of the Conser-
vatorio of San Onofrio, he wrote for it an oratorio,
'La Martiria di Santa Eugenia,' which had
much success on its first performance there in
1722. In 1723 he wrote for the wedding of
Prince Montemiletto a cantata, in which Farinelli
sang. He had, before this time, established the
school for singing whence issued those wonder
ful pupils who have made their master's name
famous. After 'L'Imeneo' came 'Amare per
regnare' and 'Semiramide' (according to Villa-
rosa) ; and a MS. in the Conservatoire of Paris
gives evidence of another opera, ' Adelaida,' be
longing to 1723 and performed at Rome. In
1724 Hasse arrived at Naples, with the avowed
intention of becoming Porpora's pupil. After a
short trial however he deserted this master hi
favour of Alessandro Scarlatti, a slight which
Porpora never forgave, and for which, in later
years, he had abundant opportunity of revenging
himself on Hasse. [See HASSE.]
Porpora's natural gifts were united to an
extremely restless, changeable disposition. He
seems never to have remained very long in one
place, and the dates of many events in his life
are uncertain. It appears that in 1 7 2 5 he set off
for Vienna, but he must have stopped at Venice
on his way, as there is evidence to show that he
was appointed to the mastership of one of the
four great singing-schools for girls there, that of
' La Pieta.' He hoped to get a hearing for some
i In his autographs Niccola, but on the title-pages of works pub
lished by himself, and in contemporary MS. copies, Niccolo.
PORPORA.
of his music at Vienna, but the Emperor Charles
VI. disliked his florid style and profuse employ
ment of vocal ornament, and gave him no en
couragement to remain. He therefore returned
as far as Venice, where he produced his opera
'Siface,' and was appointed master to another of
the schools above mentioned, that of the 'In-
curabili.' For his pupils at this institution he
wrote the vocal cantatas, twelve of which he pub
lished in London in 1735, and which are among
his best compositions.
In 1728 he set out for Dresden, where the
Electoral Princess, Marie Antoinette, was eager
to receive instruction from the famous maestro.
On the way thither he revisited Vienna, hoping
for a chance of effacing the unfavourable impres
sion he had formerly made ; but the Emperor's
prejudice against him was so strong, and carried
so much weight, as to make it seem probable
that he would once more find nothing to do. He
found a friend, however, in the Venetian am
bassador, who not only received him under his
own roof, but succeeded in obtaining for him an
Imperial commission to write an oratorio, ac
companied by a hint to be sparing in the use of
trills and flourishes. Accordingly, when the
Emperor came to hear the work rehearsed, he
was charmed at finding it quite simple and
unadorned in style. Only at the end a little
surprise was reserved for him. The theme
of the concluding fugue commenced by four
ascending notes, with a trill on each. The
strange effect of this series of trills was increased
as each part entered, and in the final stretto
became farcical outright. The Emperor's gravity
could not stand it, he laughed convulsively, but
forgave the audacious composer and paid him
well for his work. The name of this oratorio
is lost.
Porpora was warmly received at Dresden,
where he was specially patronised by his pupil,
the Electoral Princess, to whom he taught not
only singing, but composition. So it happened
that when H asse, with his wife Faustina, appeared
on the scene in 1730, he found his old master,
who had never forgiven his pupil's defection, in
possession of the field. A great rivalry ensued,
the public being divided between the two maestri,
who themselves lost no opportunity of exchanging
offices anything but friendly. The erratic Por
pora however did not by any means spend his
whole time in the 8axon capital. Early in 1729
he had produced 'Semiramide riconosciuta' at
Venice, and in April of the same year had
obtained leave of absence in order to go to Lon
don, there to undertake the direction of the opera-
house established by an aristocratic clique in
opposition to that presided over by Handel.
The speculation was a failure, and both houses
suffered serious losses. Porpora never was popu
lar in England as a composer, and even the
presence of Senesino among his company failed
to ensure its success, until, during a sojourn in
Dresden, he succeeded in engaging the great
Farinelli, who appeared in London in 1734,
with Senesino and Signora Cuzzoni, and saved
VOL. III. PT. I.
PORPORA. 1 7
the house. Porpora got his Dresden engagement
cancelled in order to remain in London, but that
he must have paid several visits to Venice is cer
tain, as 'Annibale' was produced there by him
in 1731, and 'Mitridate' was written there in
1733. It seems that he finally quitted England
in 1736, at the end of Farinelli's third and last
season in that country, and that he established
himself again at Venice ; for on the title-page
of a MS. in the Conservatoire at Paris dated
1 744, he is described as director of the ' Ospeda-
letto ' schqol of music there. About 1 745 he once
more went to Vienna, this time in the suite of
the Venetian ambassador, Correr. During a
sojourn there of some years he published a set
of twelve sonatas for violin, with figured bass,
one of his most esteemed compositions, of which
he says in the dedicatory epistle that they are
written 'in the diatonic, chromatic and enhar
monic styles ' ; describing himself as now chapel-
master to the King of Poland. At this time he
became acquainted with the young Haydn, whom
he helped with instruction and advice. [See vol. i.
p. 7046.]
He returned to Naples, his native town, be
tween 1755 and 1760. Gazzaniga, his pupil, in
a biographical notice, says it was in 1759, and
that in 1760 he succeeded Abos in the chapel-
mastership of the cathedral of Naples and of
the Conservatorio of San Onofrio. In the same
year his last opera 'Camilla' was represented,
with no success, After that he wrote nothing
but one or two pieces for the Church. He had
outlived his reputation as a composer. His latest
years were passed in extreme indigence, a fact
hard to reconcile with that of his holding the
double appointment named above, but which is
vouched for by contemporary writers, and by
Villarosa, and is a disgrace to the memory of
his pupils, especially Farinelli and Caffarelli,
who owed their fame and their vast wealth in
great measure to his instructions. Villarosa
says that he died of pleurisy in 1767: Gazza
niga affirms that his death was the result of an in
jury to his leg in i 766. Both may be true : it
is at least certain that a subscription was raised
among the musicians of the town to defray the
expenses of the poor old maestro' s burial.
Thirty-three operas of Porpora's are mentioned
by Florimo, but he probably wrote many more.
They may have been popular with singers as show
ing off what was possible in the way of execution,
but he was devoid of dramatic genius in composi
tion. Nothing can be more tedious than to read
through an opera of his, where one conventional,
florid air succeeds another, often with no change
of key and with little change of time ; here and
there a stray chorus of the most meagre descrip
tion. When not writing for the stage he achieved
better things. His cantatas for a single voice,
twelve of which were published in London in
1735, have merit, and elevation of style, and the
same is asserted of the sonatas published at
Vienna, for violin, with bass. The 'six free
fugues' for clavichord (first published by Clementi
in his 'Practical Harmony,' afterwards by M.
C
18
POKPOKA.
Farrenc, in the first number of the 'Tresor des
Pianistes') will repay attention on the part of
the modern student. There is a freshness and
piquancy about them which contrasts strangely
with his operas, and give an idea of what the
talent was that so impressed his contemporaries.
Specimens of his violin music will be found in
Choron's 'Principes,' David's ' Hoheschule,' and
Alard's ' Maitres classiques1 ; and 6 Latin duets
on the Passion, and some Solfeggi, were edited by
Nava and published by Breitkopfs.
Porpora was well educated, and conversant
with Latin and Italian literature ; he wrote
verses with success, and spoke with ease the
French, German, and English languages. In
his youth he was bold, spirited, and gay, full of
wit and vivacity, but in age his disposition and
temper became soured by misfortune. He was
celebrated for his power of repartee. The fol
lowing anecdote, extracted from the 'Dictionary
of Musicians,' has been told of other people
since his time, but seems to be true of him : —
' Passing one day through an abbey in Germany,
the monks requested him to assist at their office,
in order to hear their organist, whose talents
they greatly extolled. The office finished,
Well, what think you of our organist ? said the
prior. Why, replied Porpora, he is a clever man.
And likewise, interrupted the prior, a good and
charitable man, and his simplicity is really evan
gelical. Oh ! as for his simplicity, replied Por
pora, I perceived that ; for his left hand knoweth
not what his right hand doeth.'
In one department he has earned for himself
an unique and lasting fame. He was the greatest
singing-master that ever lived. No singers, be
fore or since, have sung like his pupils. This is
made certain by the universal contemporary testi
mony as to their powers, by the music which was
written for them and which they performed, and
by the fact that such relics of a grand pure style of
vocalisation as remain to us now, have been handed
down in direct succession from these artists. He
has left us no written account of his manner of
teaching, and such solfeggi of his as we possess
differ only from those of his contemporaries by
being perhaps more exclusively directed than
others are towards the development of flexibility
in the vocal organ. In musical interest they
are inferior to those of Scarlatti and Leo, and
to some of those of Hasse. There is little dif
ference between them and his songs, which are
for the most part only so many solfeggi. The
probability is that he had no peculiar method of
his own, but that he was one of those artists
whose grand secret lies in their own personality.
To a profound knowledge of the human voice in its
every peculiarity, and an intuitive sympathy with
singers, he must have united that innate capacity
of imposing his own will on others which is a
form of genius. Powerful indeed must have been
the influence that could keep a singer (as he is
said to have kept Caffarelli) for five years to one
sheet of exercises. And if we are inclined to
think that when Caffarelli was dismissed with
the words 'You may go, you are the greatest
PORTER.
singer in Europe,' there must still have been a
good deal for him to learn which that sheet
of exercises could not teach him, still, no mechan
ical difficulty then stood between him and the
acquisition of these qualities ; the instrument
was perfect. And the best proof of this is that
when Charles VI. expressed to Farinelli his
regret that so consummate a vocalist should de
vote himself entirely to exhibitions of skill and
bravura, and Farinelli, struck by the truth of
the criticism, resolved to appeal more to emotion
and less to mere admiration, the vocal instrument
proved adequate to the new demand made upon
it, and its possessor ' became the most pathetic, as
he had been the most brilliant of singers.'
Porpora himself aspired to be remembered by
his compositions rather than by the solid work
which has immortalised his name. To be useful
to others was a lot not brilliant enough to satisfy
his restless ambition, and that in this usefulness
lay his real genius was a truth he never could
willingly accept.
Lists of his works are to be found in Villa-
rosa's notice of his life, and in those by Farrenc
(Tre"sor des Pianistes, i.) and Fetis. Probably
the most complete is that given in Florimo's
'Cenno storico sulla Scula di Napoli,' 1869,
pp. 376-80. [F.A.M.]
PORTA, FRANCESCO BELLA, organist and
church composer, born in Milan about 1590,
as is conjectured from his having published in
1619 a collection of ' Villanelle a i, 2, e 3 voci,
accommodate per qualsivoglio stromento ' (Rome,
Robletti). This fact seems to confute Fe"tis and
Mendel, who place his birth in the beginning of
the 1 7th century. His master was Ripalta,
organist of Monza, and he became organist and
maestro di capella of more than one church in
Milan, where he died in 1666. He published
Salmi a capella, motets, ricercari, etc. ; and was
one of the first composers to make practical use
of the basso continue. [F. G.]
PORTAMENTO (Fr. Porte de voix). A
gradual 'carrying of the sound or voice with
extreme smoothness from one note to another*
[see vol. i. p. 43, note], which can only be really
executed by the voice or by a bowed instrument.
It is of frequent occurrence as a musical direction
in vocal music or in that for stringed instru
ments, and also appears in music for keyed in
struments. In old music one of the AGREMENS
(see article before referred to) was so called,
though of course it was always a very poor re
presentation of the proper effect. [J.A.F.M.]
PORTENSE. The FLORILEGIUM PORTENSB
is a vast collection of church music published by
BODENSCHATZ in 1603 and 1621. He belonged
to Schulpforta near Leipzig, and hence the name
of his collection. For the list of its contents see
vol. i. p. 253. [G.]
PORTER, SAMUEL, born at Norwich in 1733,
was a pupil of Dr. Greene. In 1757 he was
elected organist of Canterbury Cathedral. In
1803 he resigned in favour of Highmore Skeats,
organist of Salisbury Cathedral. He died Dec. 1 1 ,
POUTER.
1810, and was buried in the cloisters at Canter
bury. A volume of his ' Cathedral Music,' con
taining 2 Services, 5 Anthems, a Sanctus, Kyrie,
Suffrages, and 9 chants, with his portrait on the
title, was published by his son, Rev. WILLIAM
JAMES PORTER, Head Master of the College
School, Worcester, who also published two an
thems and four chants of his own composition, on
the title-page of which he is described as ' of the
King's School, Canterbury.' Porter's Service in
D, which is of a pleasing character, is still (1880)
frequently performed. [W. H.H.]
PORTER, WALTER, son of Henry Porter,
Mus. Bac. Oxon. 1600, was on Jan. 5, 1616,
sworn gentleman of the Chapel Royal without
pay, ' for the next place that should fall void by
the death of any tenor'; a contingency which
happened on Jan. 27, I'Ji'J, in the person of
Peter Wright, and Porter was sworn in his
place on Feb. I. In 1632 he published 'Madri-
gales and Ayres of two, three, foure and five
voyces, with the continued bass, with Toccatos,
Sinfonias and Rittornelles to them after the
manner of Consort Musique. To be performed
with the Harpsechord, Lutes, Theorbos, Basse-
Violl, two Violins or two Viols.' Both Hawkins
•and Burney mention a collection bearing the
title of ' Airs and Madrigals for two, three, four
and five voices, with a thorough bass for the
organ or Theorbo Lute, the Italian way,' dated
1639, which may probably have been a second
edition of the same work. In 1639 Porter was
appointed Master of the Choristers of West
minster Abbey. After losing both his places on
the suppression of choral service in 1644 he found
a patron in Sir Edward Spencer. In 1657 he
published ' Mottets of Two Voyces for Treble or
Tenor and Bass with the Continued Bass or Score.
To be performed to an Organ, Harpsycon, Lute,
or Bass-Viol.'
Porter was buried at St. Margaret's Church,
Westminster, Nov. 30, 1659. His work, 'The
Psalms of George Sandys set to Music for two
Voyces with a Thorough-bass for the Organ,' was
published about 1670. [W. H.H.]
PORTMAN, RICHARD, a pupil of Orlando
Gibbons, in 1633 succeeded Thomas Day as
organist of Westminster Abbey. In 1638 he
was admitted a gentleman of the Chapel Royal
upon the death of John Tomkins. A complete
Service by him, including a Venite, is contained
in the Tudway Collection (Harl. MS. 7337),
where his Christian name is erroneously given
as William ; some of his anthems are extant in
cathedral choir books and elsewhere, and the
words of some may be found in Clifford's 'Divine
Services and Anthems,' 1663, and in Harl. MS.
6346. It is presumed that he was deprived of
his appointments on the suppression of choral
service in 1644. [W.H.H.]
PORTMAN N, JOHANN GOTTLIEB, Cantor, and
writer on the theory of music, born Dec. 4, 1739,
at Ober-Lichtenau near Konigsbriick in Saxony.
He received his musical education at the Kreuz-
schule in Dresden, and then went to Darmstadt,
PORTOGALLO.
19
where he became first court-singer, and in 1768
Cantor, and Collaborator of the Padagogium.
He died at Darmstadt, Sept. 28, 1798. His theo
retical works, which were not unknown in Eng
land, are full of thought, and as a rule clear and
helpful to the student of harmony and counter
point. They include 'Kurzer musikalischer Un-
terricht fur Anfanger,' etc. with 28 plates of
examples engraved by himself (Darmstadt, pub
lished by himself, 1785; 2nd ed., enlarged by
Wagner; Heyer, Darmstadt, 1799); 'Leichtes
Lehrbuch der Harmonie, Composition, und Gene-
ralbass,' etc., with numerous examples (Darm
stadt, 1789; 2nd ed., Heyer, 1799); and 'Die
neuesten und wichtigsten Entdeckungen in der
Harmonie, Melodie, und Contrapunkt' (Darm
stadt, 1798). He also published the following
compositions — ' Neues Hessen-Darmstadtisches
Choralbuch ' (Darmstadt 1786); 'Musik auf das
Pfingstfest,' in score (about 1793) ; and a Mag
nificat (1790). As a contributor to the 'Allge-
meine deutsche Bibliothek/ he was much
dreaded for the severity of his criticisms. Among
his pupils were G. A. Schneider — born in Darm
stadt 1770, became Kapellmeister to the King of
Prussia, and bandmaster of the Guards, and died in
Berlin, Jan. 19, 1839 — and Carl Wagner, a horn-
player, Hofmusikus, and afterwards Capellmeister
at Darmstadt, where he died in 1822. [C.F.P.]
PORTOGALLO. The sobriquet of a Portu
guese musician named SIMAO, who, residing in
Italy, was known as II Portogallo — ' the Portu
guese.' He was born at Lisbon in 1763, learned
singing from Borselli of the Opera, and counter
point from Orao, maitre de chapelle in the Cathe
dral. At 20 years of age he followed Borselli to
Madrid, and became accompanyist at the opera
there. The Portuguese ambassador sent him to
Italy in 1 78 7, and he began his career with ' L'Eroe
Cineso' (Turin, 1 788) and 'LaBachettaportentosa'
(Genoa, 1788). After composing other operas
and gaining a reputation, he paid a visit to Lisbon
in 1 790, and was made chapel-master to the king.
He returned to Italy and composed opera after
opera with great success at Parma, Rome, Venice,
and Milan. Fetis quotes ' Fernando in Messico,'
written for our Mrs. Billington (Rome, 1797) as
his chef-d'oeuvre. His duties called him occa
sionally to Lisbon, but Italy was the country of
his choice. In 1807, however, the royal family
were driven to Brazil by the French invasion.
Portogallo accompanied them, and remained at
Rio Janeiro till 1815. He then returned to Italy
and resumed his position at Milan with 'Adriano
in Siria.' On the return of the king he again
went to Lisbon, and died there at the end of 1829
or beginning of 1830. Fe"tis gives a list of 26 of
his operas.
Portogallo was not unknown in London. His
'Fernando in Messica' was played at Mrs. Bil-
lington's benefit, Mar. 31, 1803; his 'Argenide
Serse,' Jan. 25, 1806; 'Semiramide,' Dec.
13, 1806; 'La rnorte di Mitridato,' at Catalani's
benefit, April 16, 1807; and 'Barseni, Regina di
Lidia,' June 3, 1815. — His brother wrote for the
church.
C2
20
POSAUNE.
POSAUNE. The German name for the Trom
bone, also occasionally used for organ reedstops
of a like character. [See TROMBONE.] [W. H. S.]
POSITIONS, or Shifts. In order to reach the
different parts of the fingerboard of the violin,
the left hand must be moved about, or placed
in various 'positions.' The hand is said to be
in the first position, when the thumb and ist
finger are at the extreme end of the neck of the
violin, close to the nut. In this, the first position,
on an instrument which is tuned in the usual
way (as at No. i), the ist finger produces the
four notes shown at No. 2, or their chromatic
alterations. The compass1 thus attainable by the
four fingers in the first position extends from A
to B (as at No. 3). The open strings are in
dependent of the position of the left hand.
If by an upward movement of the hand the
1st finger is put on the place which, in the first
position, was occupied by the 2nd finger, and the
whole hand is similarly advanced, the four notes
shown at No. 4 will be produced, and the hand
(No. 1) (No. 2) (No. 3) (No. 4)
j^— »
_f^>
-<&>-
(No. 6) .a.
(No. 7) ^
8'
IfU
S3Z
is said to be in the second position ; and while in
this position an additional note is reached on
the ist string (see No. 5), on the other hand, the
low A — produced in the first position by the ist
finger on the 4th string — is lost. The notes which
were taken in the first position on the other three
strings by the ist finger, are now produced by
the 4th finger on the next lower string ; the 2nd
finger takes the place of the 3rd, and the 3rd the
place of the 4th.
The third position extends from C to D (see
No. 6), and stands in exactly the same relation
to the second position, as the second stood to the
first. And so does every following position to
the one below it.
Eleven different positions exhaust all capabil
ities of the violin, and represent a compass from
G to E in altissimo (see No. 7). Notes beyond
this compass are almost always reached from
lower positions, or harmonics are substituted for
them. But even the positions above the seventh
are but rarely employed.
The term 'half -position' (German Sattel-Lage)
is used for a modified first position, in which
the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th finger takes the places
generally taken by the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd finger.
It facilitates the execution of pieces in certain
keys. A passage like this —
2432
i Besides the natural compass of a position, notes which really lie
beyond it are frequently reached by extension of the fingers, without
the hand leaving its position.
POSITIONS.
is best played in the half-position, with the
fingering as marked.
It wiU appear from the above that the same
note can be produced in different positions,
on different strings, and by different fingers.
-1=2-
For example : the note
, naturally taken
in the first position by the 2nd finger on the 1st
string, can also be produced
1. On ist string by ist finger in 2nd position.
2. On 2nd string by 4th „ 3rd „
3rd » 4th
2nd „ fth
ist „ 6th „
3. On 3rd string by 4th „ 7th „
3rd „ 8th
4. On 4th string by 4th „ nth2 „
Theoretically every single note lying within
the compass of a position can be produced in
that position; but practically the choice of position
for the rendering of a given phrase or passage
is made
1. On grounds of absolute mechanical ne
cessity, or
2. of convenience, or
3. to satisfy the requirements of good phrasing,
or of a special musical character.
I. Absolute necessity. Many double-stops
formed by notes within the compass of the
first or any other position, cannot be executed
in that position —
(a) if, in that position, both notes li^on the
same string. Such double-stops as 33
must be played in the second position (2nd and
4th finger) or in the third position (ist and 3rd
finger), in either of which positions each note
lies on a separate string, while in the first position
they are both on one and the same string, and
cannot therefore be sounded simultaneously.
(6) Double-stops formed by notes which He
in one position on non-contiguous strings (ist
and 3rd, or 2nd and 4th) cannot be played in
that position, but must be played in a position
where the notes lie on strings that can be sounded
together. This double-stop
is there
fore impossible in the first position, where F lies
on the ist and G on the 3rd string. But it is
easily given in the third position, where F lies
on the 2nd and G on the 3rd string.
Again, in a passage like this —
MOZART, Violin Concerto.
in order to sound the open G-string at the same
time, the whole of the upper part must be played
on the 3rd string, thereby necessitating an ascent
to the seventh position.
2 Generally taken as a harmonic.
POSITIONS.
2. Convenience. Many passages, especially
those in which notes of widely different range
succeed each other rapidly, would be impractic
able but for the use of higher positions, even
for those notes which might, theoretically speak
ing, be taken in lower positions.
In a passage like this —
POSTHORN.
21
the three lower notes of each group might be
played in the first position, if by themselves ;
but in connexion with the two high notes, the
jump from the first to the fifth position, which is
absolutely necessary in order to reach them, would
make a smooth execution of the phrase, even at
a moderately rapid pace, quite impossible. If
started at once in the fifth position there is no
difficulty at all.
3. The tasteful and characteristic rendering of
many phrases and passages requires a careful
choice of positions, based on the distinct and
contrasting qualities of sound of the four dif
ferent strings. Where sameness of sound is
required, the change from one string to another
will, if possible, be avoided ; where contrast is
wanted, different strings will be used even in
cases where one string could give all the notes.
A phrase like this —
^——i ^ BEETHOVEN,
Kreutzer Sonata.
Tf-f
etc.
though lying entirely within the compass of the
first position, must, in order to sound as cantabile
as possible, be played entirely on the 2nd string,
in the first and third or second position alter
nately. In the first position a constant change
from the 1st to the 2nd string would be necessary,
and the phrase would thereby sound jerky and
uneven, the very opposite of what it ought to be.
Or this passage in Spohr's Scena Cantate
Concerto —
if not played entirely on the sonorous 4th string,
would absolutely lose its peculiar character. In
other instances the meaning of a passage is only
made intelligible by its being played in the proper
position. The following is from Bach's Preludium
in E (bars 13 and 14) : —
ooooo oooooo
1st string
. 2nd string
In this instance, unless the whole of the lower
part is played on the 2nd string in higher positions,
the necessary contrast to the pedal note E,
which is strongly given by the open string,
cannot be properly marked. It will thus clearly
appear that a complete command of the finger
board in all positions is one of the chief tech
nical requirements of the art of violin-playing,
and that the right choice of position, on which
a truly musical, tasteful, and characteristic
rendering of every composition largely depends,
is one of the main tests of a violinist's artistic
feeling and judgment. Studies in all the usual
positions are given in every good violin school.
The best known are those in Baillot's ' L'art du
Violon,' but they have the defect of being all
written in C major. [P.D.]
POSITIVE ORGAN (Fr. Positif; Ger. Posi-
tiv). Originally a stationary organ, as opposed
to a portative or portable instrument used in
processions. [See ORGAN, p. 575&.] Hence the
term 'positive ' came to signify a 'chamber organ' ;
and later still, when in a church instrument a
separate manual was set aside for the accom
paniment of the choir, this also was called a
'positive,' owing no doubt to the- fact that it
generally had much the same delicate voicing as
a chamber organ, and contained about the same
number and disposition of stops. By old English
authors the term is generally applied to a chamber
organ ; the ' positive ' of our church instru
ments being called from its functions the ' choir
organ.' When placed behind the player (Ger.
Riickpositiv) it was often styled a ' chair organ,'
but it is difficult to say whether this name
arose from a play upon the terms ' choir ' and
' chair,' or from a misunderstanding as to the
origin of its distinctive title. With the French
the 'Clavier de positif is our 'Choir manual.'
Small portable organs were called Regals. [See
REGAL.] [J.S.]
POSTANS, Miss. See SHAW, MRS. ALFRED.
POSTHORN. A small straight brass or
copper instrument, varying in length from two to
four feet, of a bore usually resembling the conical
bugle more than the trumpet, played by means
of a small and shallow-cupped mouthpiece.
Originally intended as a signal for stage-coaches
carrying mails, it has to a limited extent been
adopted into light music for the production of
occasional effects by exceptional players.
Its pitch varies according to length from the
four-foot C to its two-foot octave. The scale con
sists of the ordinary open notes, commencing
with the first harmonic. The fundamental sound
cannot be obtained with the mouthpiece used.
Five, or at most six, sounds, forming a common
chord, are available, but no means exist for
bridging over the gaps between them. In a
four-foot instrument such as was commonly used
by mail guards, the sequence would be as
follows —
(Not
used.)
(Difficult.)
A post -horn galop was played on this instrument
by the late Mr. Koenig. Mr. T. Harper, the
eminent trumpet-player, has composed another,
22
POSTHORN.
named ' Down-tlie-road Galop,' with obbligato
parts for two posthorns, one in F and another
in A. Beethoven has quoted a post-horn solo.
[See POSTILLONS.] [W.H.S.]
POSTHUMOUS. A term applied to works
published after the death of the author. It is
frequently used with reference to Beethoven's
last five quartets, though the term is in no way
applicable to the first of the five — op. 127, in
Eb — which was published by Schott & Sons,
on March 26, 1826, exactly a year before Bee
thoven's death, March 26, 1827. The following
table of the order of composition, date of publica
tion, and opus-nuinber, of these five exceptional
works may be useful.
Key.
Date of publication.
Opus-number.
Eb
March 26, 1826
Op. 127
A minor
Sept. 1827
„ 132
Bb
May 7, 1827
„ 130
C# minor
April, 1827
„ 131
F
Sept. 1827
,, 135
Schubert died Nov. 19, 1828, and all works
by him after op. 88 are Posthumous, excepting
« Winterreise ' part I (1-12) ; op. 90 (nos. i and
2); ops. 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, TOO, 101, 105,
1 06, 1 08. Mendelssohn's posthumous works be
gin with op. 73; Schumann's with op. 136. [G.]
POSTILLON DE LONGJUMEAU, LE. An
opeVa-comique in 3 acts, or rather perhaps an
extravaganza ; words by De Leuven and Bruns
wick, music by A. Adam. Produced at the Opdra
Comique, Oct. 13, 1836. [G.]
POSTILLONS. ' Symfonie allegro Postilions '
is Handel's autograph inscription to the piece of
orchestral music which precedes the entry of the
Wise Men in 'Belshazzar,' and begins as follows :—
/)
-«
•
9.
^ f '
•- -*-
I |
TJ « » > •
_
KS\/ *-|- ^
kia
t
Q
•• 1 LLi
A. X"
?
».
-
»
-
i'""
i i
- <
>
*
It is written for the strings, with oboes in
unison ; no horn is employed ; some of the later
passages resemble those which can be played on
the ordinary posthorn ; but there is nothing to
say whether this was the origin of the indication,
or whether it refers to the haste in which the
Wise Men may be supposed to have arrived, or
contains some allusion now lost.
Sebastian Bach, in his Capriccio describing
the departure of his brother, has introduced an
'Aria di Postiglione' and a 'Fuga all' imita-
zione delle cornetta di Postiglione.' One of the
figures in the former has some likeness to that
quoted above.
Beethoven, in a sketch-book of 1812, quoted
by Nottebohm (Mus. Wochenblatt, April 25,
POTTER.
1879), has quoted a nourish of the 'Postilion
von Karlsbad ' : —
But this is a mere ordinary phrase, and may be
heard from many a postilion or driver in Germany
of less renown than the one from whose instru
ment Beethoven is supposed to have taken it
down. (See Thayer, 'Beethoven,' iii. 183, with
the remarks of Nottebohm, as above.) [G.]
POSTLUDE, a piece played after service, an
outgoing voluntary. The term is an adaptation
from the Latin-German ' Postludium.' Henry
Smart has occasionally employed it. [G.]
POT-POURRI. A name first given by J. B.
Cramer to a kind of drawing-room composition
consisting of a string of well-known airs from
some particular opera, or even of national or
other familiar tunes having no association with
each other. These were connected by a few
showy passages, or sometimes by variations on
the different themes. The pot-pourri was a less
ambitious form of composition than the (modern)
fantasia, as there was little or no working-out of
the subjects taken, and very little ' fancy ' was
required in its production. It had its own class
of admirers, and was at one time a very popular
form of composition. Peters's Catalogue contains
38 by V. Felix, and 64 by Ollivier, on all the
chief operas. Chopin, in a letter, calls his op. 13
a 'Potpurri' on Polish airs. The pot-pourri
has been invaded by the 'transcription,' which
closely resembles it in form although taking only
one subject as a rule, instead of many. ' Olla
podrida' was another name for the same sort of
production. [J.A.F.M.]
POTT, AUGUST, born November 7, 1806, at
Nordheim, Hanover, where his father was Stadt-
musikus. He adopted the violin as his instrument,
and shortly after Spohr's appointment to be Hof-
Capellmeister at Cassel, went there as his pupil,
and there made his first public appearance in
1824. He occupied the next few years in travel
ling through Denmark and Germany. In 1832 he
was appointed Concertmeister to the Duke of
Oldenburg, and afterwards advanced to the post
of Capellmeister at the same court. This he
resigned in 1861, and is now (1880) living at
Gratz. In 1838 he visited England, and played
Lipinski's concerto in B minor at the Philhar
monic on May 21 with great applause. The
critic of the ' Musical World' speaks with enthu
siasm of the extraordinary power of his tone,
his great execution, and the purity of his style.
He has published two Concertos, and various
smaller pieces for the violin with and without
orchestra. [G.]
POTTER, PHILIP CIPRIANI IHAMBLY, born in
London in 1792, began his musical education at 7,
under his father, a teacher of the pianoforte. He
i He derived this name from his godmother, a sister of J. B. Cipriani
the painter.
POTTER.
afterwards studied counterpoint under Attwood,
and theory under Callcott and Crotch, and on
Woelfl's arrival in England received instruction
from him during five years. In 1816 an overture
by Mr. Potter was commissioned and performed
(March n) by the Philharmonic Society, and
on April 29 of the same year he made his first
public appearance as a performer at the Society's
concert, and played the pianoforte part in a
sestet of his own composition, for pianoforte and
stringed instruments. He again performed March
10, 1817. Shortly after this he went to Vienna
and studied composition under Forster, receiving
also friendly advice from Beethoven. Writing
to Hies in London, on March 5, 1818, the
great man says, 'Potter has visited me several
times: he seems to be a good man, and has
talent for composition.' After visiting other
German towns he made a tour in Italy, and
returned to London in 1821, when he performed
Mozart's Concerto in D at the Philharmonic
(Mar. 12). In 1822 he was appointed professor
of the pianoforte at the Royal Academy of Music,
and on the resignation of Dr. Crotch in June
1832 succeeded him as Principal. The latter
office he resigned in 1859, in favour of Stern-
dale Bennett.
Mr. Potter's published works extend to op. 29,
and include 2 sonatas, 9 rondos, 2 toccatas, 6 sets
of variations, waltzes, a polonaise, a Targe num
ber of impromptus, fantasias, romances, amuse
ments, etc., and two books of studies1 composed
for the Royal Academy of Music — all for PF.
solo. Also a 'Duet Symphony' in D, and 4 other
duets, besides arrangements of 2 of his symphonies
and an overture — all for 4 hands ; a fantasia and
fugue for 2 PFs. ; a trio for 3 players on the PF. ;
a sestet for PF. and instruments ; a duo for PF.
and V. ; a sonata for PF. and horn, 3 trios, etc., etc.
His MS. works comprise 9 symphonies for full
orchestra, of which 6 are in the Philharmonic
Library ; 4 overtures (3 ditto) ; 3 concertos, PF.
and orch. (ditto) ; a concertante, PF. and cello ;
a cantata, ' Medora e Corrado' ; an Ode to Har
mony ; additional accompaniments to ' Acis and
Galatea,' and many other pieces of more or less
importance. These compositions, though well
received,2 and many of them in their time
much in vogue, are now forgotten, except the
studies.
As a performer he ranked high, and he had
the honour to introduce Beethoven's Concertos
in C, C minor, and G, to the English public at
the Philharmonic. As a conductor he is most
highly spoken of, and it may be worth mentioning
that he beat time with his hand and not with a
baton. He died Sept. 26, 1871. His fresh and
genial spirit, and the eagerness with which he
welcomed and tried new music from whatever
quarter, will not be forgotten by those who had
1 Recently analysed by Mr. W. H. Holmes in 'Notes upon Notes'
(1880). The studies are 24 in number and are arranged for a key and
its relative minor— No. 1, C major; 2, A minor ; 3, Db major ; 4, Bb
minor, etc.
2 The Symphonies were played at the Philharmonic as follows:—
In — , May 29, 1826, Jan. 8, '35 ; in A, May 27, '33 ; in G minor, May 19,
'34. May 28. '55; in D, Mar. 21, '36, Ap. 22, '50. May 3, '69.
POUGIN.
23
the pleasure and profit of his acquaintance. One
of the last occasions on which he was seen in
public was assisting in the accompaniment of
Brahms's Requiem, at its first performance in
London, not three months before his death. He
contributed a few papers to periodicals — ' Recol
lections of Beethoven,' to the Musical World,
April 29, 1836 (reprinted in Mus. Times, Dec. i,
1861) ; 'Companion to the Orchestra, or Hints
on Instrumentation,' Musical World, Oct. 28,
Dec. 23, 1836, Mar. 10, May 12, 1837. Mr.
Potter edited the ' Complete Pianoforte Works of
Mozart,' for Messrs. Novello; and Schumann's
'Album fur die Jugend' (op. 68) for Messrs.
Wessel & Co. in 1857.
In 1860 a subscription was raised and an
Exhibition founded at the Royal Academy of
Music in honour of Mr. Potter. It is called
after him, and entitles the holder to one year's
instruction in the Academy. [W.H.H.]
POUGIN, ARTHUR, born Aug. 6, 1834, at
Chateauroux, where he is registered as Francois
Auguste Arthur Paroisse-Pougin. As the son
of an itinerant actor he had few educational
advantages, and his literary attainments are
therefore due to his own exertions alone ; his
knowledge of music was partly obtained at the
Paris Conservatoire, where he passed through
the violin-class and harmony with Henri Reber.
From the age of 13 he played the violin at a
theatre ; and at 21 became conductor of the
Theatre Beaumarchais, which however he soon
quitted for Musard's orchestra. From 1856 to
59 he was vice- conductor and r&pititeur (or con
ductor of rehearsals) at the Folies Nouvelles.
Pougin soon turned his attention to musical
literature, beginning with biographical articles
on French musicians of the i8th century in the
'Revue et Gazette Musicale.' Musical biography
remains his favourite study, but he has been an
extensive writer on many other subjects. At
an early period of his career he gave up teach
ing, and resigned his post among the violins at
the Opdra Comique (1860 to 63) in order the
better to carry out his literary projects. Besides
his frequent contributions to the ' Me'nestrel,'
' La France musicale,' ' L'Art musical,' and
other periodicals specially devoted to music, he
edited the musical articles in the ' Dictionnaire
universel' of Larousse, and has been succes
sively musical feuilletoniste to the * Soir,' the
'Tribune,' ' L'Evenement,' and, since 1878, to
the 'Journal Officiel ' where he succeeded Eugene
Gautier.
Among his numerous works, the following may
be specified : — ' Meyerbeer, notes biographiques '
(1864, I2mo); 'F.HaleVy, e'crivain '(1865, Svo) ;
'W. Vincent Wallace, e"tude biographique et
critique' (1866, 8vo); ' Bellini, sa vie, ses ceuvres'
(1868, I2mo); 'Albert Grisar, <Stude artistique '
(1870, I2mo) ; ' Rossini, notes, impressions, etc.*
(1871, 8vo); <Boieldieu,sa vie, etc' (1875, i2mo);
'Figures d'ope'ra-comique : Elleviou; Mme. Du-
gazon ; la tribu de Gavaudan' (1875, 8vo) ; • Ra-
meau, sa vie et ses ceuvres' (1876, i6mo);
' Adolphe Adam, sa vie, etc.' (1876, I2mo),— all
POUGIN.
PILETORIUS.
published in Paris ; and finally the ' Supplement
et Complement ' to the ' Biographic Universelle
des Musiciens ' of Fetis, a work of great extent
and industry, and containing a mass of new
names and information (2 vols. Svo, Paris,
1878-80). [G.C.]
POWELL, WALTER, born at Oxford in 1697,
was on July I, 1704 admitted a chorister of
Magdalen College. In 1714 he was appointed a
clerk in the same college. On April 16, 1718 he
was elected Yeoman Bedell of Divinity and on
Jan. 26, 1732 Esquire Bedell of the same faculty.
He was also a member of the choirs of Christ
Church and St. John's Colleges. In July 1733
he sang in the oratorios given by Handel during
his visit to Oxford, and later in the year at the
Meeting of the Three Choirs at Gloucester. He
is said, but erroneously, to have been afterwards
appointed a gentleman of the Chapel Royal. His
voice (countertenor) and singing were greatly ad
mired. He died Nov. 6, 1 744, and was buried at
St. Peter's in the East, Oxford. [W.H.H.]
PRACTICAL HARMONY, INTRODUCTION
TO. The title of a treatise, and collection of
pieces by masters of different schools, edited
and arranged by Muzio dementi, in 4 volumes,
oblong quarto. The original title is ' dementi's
Selection of Practical Harmony, for the Organ or
Piano Forte ; containing Voluntaries, Fugues,
Canons and other Ingenious Pieces. By the
most eminent composers. To which is prefixed
an Epitome of Counterpoint by the Editor.
(Here follow 5 lines from Paradise Lost, Bk. xi).
London printed by Clementi, Banger, Hyde,
Collard & Davis, No. 26 Cheapside.' The price
of each volume was one guinea. Vols. i and 2
alone are in the British Museum. The following
is a complete catalogue of the contents.
Vol. I.
Treatise on Harmony and Coun
terpoint by Clementi.
Kirnberger. 2 Voluntaries in F
4 Fugues, in Cjf minor,
minor, Bb, and D minor
Gavotte in D minor. Fugu
in D. Prelude and Fugue in
G. Fugue and Polonaise in
Eb. Fugue and Polonaise
in F minor and major. Pre
lude and Fugue in C.
A set of Canons by C. P. E. Bach
Fasch.Turini.Padre Martini
and A. da Vallerano.
Caresano. Double Fugue in C.
Perti, Antonio. Fugue in D.
Bach, C. P. E. Canon in G-
Haydn, Joseph. Minuet and Trio
in E minor.
Bach, C. P. E. Two minuets.
Handel. Fugue in B minor.
Porpora. 6 Fugues, in A, G, D,
Bb, G minor and C.
Albrechtsberger. 9 Fugues, in B
minor, E, A minor, F, C,
E b, 0, A minor, and A.
Telemann. Fughetta in D.
Eberlin, J. E. 5 Voluntaries and
Fugues, in D minor, A minor,
E minor, C, and F.
Umstatt. Voluntary and Fugue
in G minor.
Sfarpurg. Prelude and Fugue in G.
Mozart. Fugue in D minor from
the Requiem, arranged by
Clementi.
Bach, C. P. E. 2 Voluntaries and
Fugues, in A and D minor.
Fantasia and Fugue in G
minor. Voluntary and Fugue
in F minor.
Bach, Ernest. Fantasia and
Fugue in F.
Bach, Job. Seb. Organ Fantasia
in G, arranged. Suite (5th
French) in G.
Vol. II.
Albrechtsberger, 6 Fugues, in G,
B minor, G, G minor, D, and
D minor.
Eberlin. 4 Voluntaries and Fugues,
in G minor, D, G, and E
minor.
Mozart. Fantasia in F minor, ar
ranged.
Bach, C. P. E. Fantasia and
Fugue in C minor. Fantasia
in C. Voluntary and Fugue
in 0 minor. Organ Sonata
inBb.
Bach, Joh. Seb. Toccata and
Fugue in D minor.
Handel. 11 Fugues, in G minor,
C minor, B , A minor, G,
B minor, G minor, F$ minor,
D minor, F, and F minor,
adre Martini. 4 Sonatas, in F
minor, G minor, A and E
minor.
Scarlatti, A. Fugue in F minor.
Scarlatti, D . 2 Fugues in D minor
and G minor (the ' Cat's
Fugue ').
Frescobaldi. 2Canzone in G minor
and G. 3 Fugues, in D minor,
G minor, and E minor. Can-
zona in F. Corrente in F
minor. Toccata in F.
Vol. III.
Bach, W. F. Fugue and Capriccio
in D minor. 2 Polonaises in
F. Fugue in D. Adagio in
B minor. Vivace in D.
Polonaise in D. Fugue and
Polonaise in C. 2 Fugues, in
C minor and Bb. 2 Polon
aises in Bb and G minor.
Fugue and Polonaise in
Eb. Fugue and Polonaise
in E minor. Polonaise in E.
Fugue and Polonaise in F
minor. Fugue and Polon
aise in C minor.
Bach, C. P. E. Fantasia in C
minor. Fugue in C minor
for organ [by J. S. Bach,
wrongly attributed to C.P.E.
Bach]. Kondo in C minor,
Fantasia in C. Fugue in C
minor on the name ' Bach.'
Allegro in C. Andantino in
0 minor. Presto in C minor.
Allegro in C. Sonata in F,
and Sinfonia in F.
Bach, J. C. F. Fugue in C minor.
Eondo fn C. Minuet in C.
Polonaise in G. Sonata in C.
Bach, J. Christoph (third son of
J. S. Bach). 2 Sonatas, in E
and C minor.
Bach, J. S. 2 Fugues, in A minor
andC.
Vol. IV.
Padre Martini. 9 Sonatas— in E
minor, B minor, D, D minor,
B b, G, C minor, C and F.
Albrechtsberger. 21 Fugues— in
F, F minor, G, G minor. A
and A minor; (these preceded
by ' Cadenzas or Preludes ')
in D, A, E, E minor, G, Bti
and C ; (these with Preludes)
in D minor, E minor, G. A
minor, B minor ; (the rest
without Preludes)inD minor
— ' Christus resurrexit,' in C
—'Alleluja,' inC— ' Alleluja'
— ' Ite Missa est.'
[J.A.F.M.]
PRAEGER, FERDINAND CHRISTIAN WILHELM,
son of Heinrich Aloys Praeger, violinist, com
poser, and capellmeister, was born at Leipzig,
Jan. 22, 1815. His musical gifts developed them
selves very early ; at nine he played the cello
with ability, but was diverted from that instru
ment to the piano by the advice of Hummel. At
sixteen he established himself as teacher at the
Hague, meanwhile strenuously maintaining his
practice of the piano, violin, and composition.
In 1834 he settled in London, where he still re
sides, a well-known and much esteemed teacher.
But though living in London Mr. Praeger has
not broken his connexion with the Continent : he
is still correspondent of the ' Neue Zeitschrift fur
Musik,' a post for which he was selected by Schu
mann himself in 1842. In Jan. 1851 he gave
a recital in Paris of his own compositions with
success; in 1852 he played at the Gewandhaus,
Leipzig, and at Berlin, Hamburg, etc. ; and later,
in 1867, a new PF. trio of his was selected by the
United German Musicians, and performed at their
festival at Meiningen. He has always been an
enthusiast for Wagner, and it was partly owing to
his endeavours that Wagner was engaged to con
duct the Philharmonic Concerts in 1855. He ig
beloved by his numerous pupils, and a concert of
his compositions was organised by them in his
honour, on July 10, 1879, *n London. An over
ture from his pen entitled 'Abellino' was played
at the New Philharmonic Concerts of May 24,
1854, and July 4, 1855 (under Lindpaintner and
Berlioz) ; and a Symphonic Prelude to Manfred
at the Crystal Palace, April 17, 1880. A selec
tion of his best pieces is published in 2 vols.
under the title of the ' Praeger Album ' (Kahnt,
Leipzig). [G.]
PR^NESTINUS. The Latinised form of the
name of the great Italian composer, derived from
the town of Prseneste, one of the most ancient
cities of Italy, and now called Palestrina.
' Johannes Petrus Aloisius Praanestinus ' answers
to the Italian 'Giovanni Pier Luigi da Pales
trina.'
PR^TORIUS, or PRATORIUS. The
assumed surname of more than one family of
PR.ETORIUS.
distinguished German Musicians, whose true
patronymic was Schultz.1
Of the numerous Composers whoso works are
published under this name, the most celebrated
was MICHAEL PR.ETORIUS, a learned and indus
trious writer, of whose personal history very little
is known, beyond the facts, that he was born at
Creutzberg in Thuringia, on Feb. 15, 157*! that
he began his artistic career, in the character of
Kapellmeister, at Luneburg ; that he afterwards
entered the service of the Duke of Brunswick,
first as Organist, and then as Kapellmeister and
Secretary; was appointed Prior of the Monastery
of Ringelheim, near Gozlar, without necessity of
residence ; and died at Wolfenbuttel, on his fiftieth
birthday, Feb. 15, 1621.
The Compositions of Michael Praetorius are
very voluminous. He himself has left us, at the
end of his ' Syntagma Musicum,' a catalogue, the
most important items of which are, 15 volumes
of ' Polyhymnia,' adapted partly to Latin, and
partly to German words ; 16 volumes of 'Musse
Sioniae,' of which the first five are in Latin, and
the remainder in German ; 9 volumes of a saecular
work, called ' Musa Aonia,' of which the several
books are entitled 'Terpsichore' (2 vols.), 'Cal
liope' (2 vols.), 'Thalia' (a vols.), 'Erato' (i vol.),
' Diana Teutonica ' (i vol.), and ' Regensburgische
Echo' (i vol.) ; and a long list of other works,
' partly printed, and partly, through God's mercy,
to be printed.' The first of these is the ' Syntagma
Musicum' (Musical Treatise) itself — a book the
excessive rarity and great historical value of
which entitle it to a special notice.
The full title of this remarkable work is,
'Syntagma Musicum ; ex veterum et recentiorum
Ecclesiasticorum autorum lectione, Polyhistorum
consignatione, Variarum linguarum notatione,
Hodierni seculi usurpatione, ipsius denique
Musicae artis observatione : in Cantorum, Or-
ganistarum, Organopceorum, ceterorumque Mu-
sicam scientiam amantium & tractantium gratiam
collectum ; et Secundum generalem Indicem toti
Operi praefixum, In Quatuor Tomos distributum,
a Michaele Praetorio Creutzbergensi, Coenobii
Ringelheimensis Priori, & in aula Brunsvicensi
Chori Musici Magistro. [VVitteberg£e(stc),Anno
1615.]' Notwithstanding this distinct mention
of four volumes, it is morally certain that no more
than three were ever printed, and that the much
coveted copy of the fourth, noticed in Forkel's
catalogue, was nothing more than the separate
cahier of plates attached to the second.
TOM. I. (Wittenberg, 1615), written chiefly in
Latin, but with frequent interpolations in Ger
man, is arranged in two principal Parts, each sub
divided into innumerable minor sections. Part I.
is entirely devoted to the consideration of Ec
clesiastical Music ; and its four sections treat,
respectively, (i) of Choral Music and Psalmody,
as practised in the Jewish, ^Egyptian, Asiatic,2
Greek, and Latin Churches ; (2) of the Music of
the Mass ; (3) of the Music of the Antiphons,
1 The word SchuUze signifies the Head-man of a village or small
town ; and may therefore be translated by Praetor.
2 Called, in the German index, the Arabian Church.
PR.ETORIUS.
25
Psalms, Tones, Responsoria, Hymns, and Can
ticles, as sung at Matins and Vespers, and the
Greater and Lesser Litanies ; and (4), of Instru
mental Music, as used in the Jewish and early
Christian Churches, including a detailed descrip
tion of all the Musical Instruments mentioned
either in the Old, or the New Testament. Part II.
treats of the Ssecular Music of the Antients, in
cluding, (i) Dissertations on the Invention and
Inventors of the Art of Music, its most eminent
Teachers, its Modes, and Melodies, its connection
with Dancing and the Theatre, its use at Funeral
Ceremonies, and many other kindred matters;
and (2), Descriptions of all the Instruments used
in antient Saecular Music, on the forms and pecu
liarities of some of which much light is thrown by
copious quotations from the works of Classical
Authors.
Ton. II., printed at Wolfenbuttel in 15 18,3
and written wholly in German, is called Organo-
graphia, and divided into five principal sections.
Part I. treats of the nomenclature and classifica
tion of all the Musical Instruments in use at the
beginning of the I7th century — that critical
period in the History of Instrumental Music
which witnessed the first development of the
Operatic Orchestra, and concerning which we are
here furnished with much invaluable information.
Part II. contains descriptions of the form, com
pass, quality of tone, and other peculiarities of
all these Instruments, seriatim ; including, among
Wind Instruments, Trombones of four different
sizes, the various kinds of Trumpet, Horns (Jager
Trommetten), Flutes, both of the old and the
transverse forms, Cornets, Hautboys, both Treble
and Bass (here called Pommern, Bombardoni,
andSchalmeyen), Bassoons and Dolcians, Double
Bassoons and Sordoni, Doppioni, Racketten, and
the different kinds of Krumhorn (or Lituus),
Corna-muse, Bassanello, Schreyerpfeiffe, and Sack-
pfeiffe, or Bagpipes. These are followed by the
Stringed Instruments, divided into two classes —
Viole da Gamba, or Viols played between the
knees, and Viole da Brazzo, played upon the arm.
In the former class are comprised several different
kinds of the ordinary Viol da Gamba, the Viol-
bastarda, and the Violone, or Double Bass: in the
latter, the ordinary Viola da Braccio, the Violino
da Braccio, the Violetta picciola, and the Tenor
Viola da Braccio. The Lyres, Lutes, Theorbas
(sic), Mandolins, Guitars, Harps, and other In
struments in which the strings are plucked by the
fingers or by a Plectrum, are classed by them
selves ; as are the Keyed Instruments, including
the Harpsichord (Clavicymbalum), Spinet (Vir-
ginall),Clavicytherium, Claviorganum, Arpichor-
dum, the ' Niirmbergisch Geigenwerck,' and
Organs of all kinds, beginning with the antient
Regall, and Positieff. Part III., carrying on the
subject with which the former division ended,
treats of antient Organs, in detail, giving much
valuable information concerning their form and
construction. Part IV. gives a minute description
of modern Organs — i. e. Organs which were con
sidered modern 260 years ago — with details of
s Fe~tis says, 1519 ; but this is an error.
26
PR/ETORIUS.
their construction, the form of their Pipes, the
number and quality of their Stops, or Registers,
and other equally interesting and important
matters relating to them. Part V. treats of certain
individual Organs, celebrated either for their size
or the excellence of their tone, with special ac
counts of more than 30 Instruments, including
those in the Nicolaikirche and Thomaskirche at
Leipzig, the Cathedrals of Ulm, Liibeck, Magde
burg, and Brunswick, and many other well-known
Churches.
It would be difficult to exaggerate the interest
of this part of the work, which is rendered still
more valuable by an Appendix, printed at Wolfen-
biittel in 1620, two years after the publication
of Tom. II. and III., under the title of 'Theatrum
Instrumentorum, seu Sciagraphia, Michaelis
Prsetorii, C.' This consists of 42 well-executed
plates, exhibiting woodcuts of all the more im
portant instruments previously described in the
text, drawn with sufficient clearness of detail to
give a fair idea of many forms now so far obso
lete that it would be difficult to find a real
specimen in anything like working order. Among
these, there are few more curious than the en
graving of the ' Nurmbergisch Geigenwerck,' in
which the clumsiness of the Treadle (mentioned
under PIANO-VIOLIN, vol. ii. pp. 745-746), is
brought into very strong relief.
TOM. III., also printed at Wolfenbiittel, in 1618,
is arranged in three main sections. Part I. treats
of all the different kinds of Saecular Composition
practised during the first half of the i7th century,
in Italy, France, England, and Germany; with
separate accounts of the Concerto, Motet, Faux-
bourdon, Madrigal, Stanza, Sestina, Sonnet, Dia
logue, Canzone, Canzonetta, Aria, Messanza,
Quodlibet, Giustiniano, Serenata, Ballo or
Balletto, Vinetto, Giardiniero, Villanella, Pre"-
lude, Phantasie, Capriccio, Fuga, Ricercare,
Symphonia, Sonata, Intrada, Toccata, Padovana,
Passamezzo, Galliarda, Bransle, Courante, Volta,
Allemanda, and Mascherada, the distinctive
peculiarities of each of which are described with
a clearness which throws much light on cer
tain forms now practically forgotten. Part II.
deals with the technical mysteries of Solmisation,
Notation, Ligatures, Proportions, Sharps, Flats,
Naturals, Modes or Tones, Signs of all kinds,
Tactus or Rhythm, Transposition, the Arrange
ment of Voices, the Management of Double,
Triple, and Quadruple Choirs, and other like
matters. Part III. is devoted to the explanation
of Italian technical terms, the arrangement of a
complete Cappella, either Vocal, or Instrumental,
the Rules of General-Bass (Thorough-Bass), and
the management of a Concert for Voices and
Instruments of all kinds ; the whole concluding
with a detailed list of the author's own Com
positions, both Sacred and Saecular ; and a com
pendium of rules for the training of Boys' Voices,
after the Italian Method.
TOM. IV., had it been completed, was to have
treated of Counterpoint.
The chief value of the ' Syntagma Musicum '
lies in the insight it gives us into the technical
PRATT.
history of a period lying midway between the
triumphs of the Polyphonic School and the full
development of Modern Music — an epoch less
rich in such records than either that which pre
ceded, or that which followed it. It has now
become exceedingly scarce. There is no copy1 in
the British Museum, nor, so far as we have been
able to discover, in any other Library in London ;
but one is preserved in the Euing Library in
Anderson's University, Glasgow. For the use of
the remarkably fine examplar which served as
the basis of our description, we are indebted to
the Rev. Sir F. A. Gore Ouseley, who placed it
unreservedly at our disposal. One of the volumes
contains the autograph of a Bach, and another
of Telemann. Not less scarce and costly are
the Author's Compositions. There is rather an
extensive collection of separate volumes in the
British Museum ; but, of Part IX. of the ' Musse
Sioniaa,' embracing several of the last volumes,
it is doubtful whether a copy is anywhere to
be found.
Of the other Composers, who have written
under the name of Prsetorius, one of the most
celebrated was GODESCALCUS PR.ETORIUS (or
SCHULZ), born at Salzburg, in 1528, and for many
years Professor of Philosophy at Wittenberg. He
published, at Magdeburg, in 1556, a volume
entitled ' Melodise Scholasticse,' in the prepara
tion of which he was assisted by Martin Agricola.
He died July 8, 1573.
The famous Organist, HIERONTMUS PR^ETORIUS
(JEROM SOHULZ), was born, in 1560, at Hamburg,
where, after attaining an extraordinary reputa
tion, he died, in 1629. Among his numerous
Compositions, the best-known is a Christmas
Carol for 8 voices, 'Ein Kindelein so losbelich,'
Hamburg, i6i32.
JACOB PR2ETORius (or SCHULZ), the son of
Jerom, whose talent as an Organist he richly
inherited, was born at Hamburg, in the year
1600; attained a great reputation in his native
city; and died there in 1651. He is best known
by a ' Choralbuch,' which, in conjunction with
Hieron. Praetorius, Joachim Becker, and David
Scheidemann, he published at Hamburg in 1604.
BARTHOLOM^EUS PR^TORIDS is known as the
Composer of 'Newe liebliche Paduanen, und
Galliarden, mit 5 Stimmen.' Berlin, 1617.
JOHANN PRJETORIUS, a man no less remarkable
for the depth of his learning than for his great
musical talent, was born at Quedlinburg, in
1634; and, after holding several important ap
pointments at Jena, Gotha, and Halle, produced
an Oratorio called 'David' in the last-named
city, in 1681, and died there in 1705. [W.S.R.]
PRATT, JOHN, son of Jonas Pratt, music-
seller and teacher, was born at Cambridge in
1772. In 1780 he was admitted a chorister of
King's College. After quitting the choir he
became a pupil of, and deputy for, Dr. Randall,
the college organist, and on his death in March
1 799 was appointed his successor. In September
following he was appointed organist to the Uni-
1 Except of the cahier of Plates.
2 Gerber erroneously attributes this work to Michael Prsetorius.
PRATT.
versity, and in 1813 organist of St. Peter's College.
He composed several services and anthems. He
published 'A Collection of Anthems, selected
from the works of Handel, Haydn, Mozart, Clari,
Leo and Carissimi' (an adaptation to English
words of detached movements from the masses,
etc. of those composers), and a selection of psalm
and hymn tunes entitled ' Psalmodia Canta-
brigiensis.' He died March 9, 1855, possessed of
a good local reputation. [W.H.H.]
PRATTEN, ROBERT SIDNEY, a very distin
guished English flute-player, born Jan. 23, 1824,
at Bristol, where his father was a professor of
music. The boy was considered a prodigy on
the flute, and in his I2th year was much in
request at the Concerts at Bath and Bristol.
From thence he migrated to Dublin, where he
played first flute at the Theatre Royal and
musical societies. In 1846 he came to London,
and was soon engaged as first flute at the Royal
Italian Opera, the Sacred Harmonic and Phil
harmonic Societies, the Musical Society of Lon
don, Mr. Alfred Mellon's Concerts, etc. Through
the kindness of the Duke of Cambridge, Mr.
Pratten passed some time in Germany in the
study of theory and composition, and became
a clever writer for his instrument. His Con-
certstuck and Fantasia on Marie Stuart are
among the best of his productions. He died at
Ramsgate, Feb. 10, 1868, beloved by a large
circle. Mr. Pratten had a very powerful tone
and remarkable power of execution. His ear
was extraordinarily sensitive, and in consequence
his intonation and the gradation of his nuances
were perfect, though his taste was perhaps a trifle
too florid. His widow is a well-known professor
of the guitar. — His brother, Frederick Sidney
Pratten was an eminent contrabassist, engaged
in the same orchestras as himself. He died in
London, Mar. 3, 1873. [G.]
PREAMBULUM. See PRELUDE.
PRE ATJX CLERCS, LE. An opdra comique
in 3 acts ; words by Planard, music by Hdrold.
Produced at the Ope'ra Comique, Dec. 15, 1832,
a few weeks before the composer's death, Jan. 19,
1833. The loooth representation, Oct. 10, 1871.
Given in London (in French) at the Princess's,
May 2, 1849, and in Italian (same title) at Covent
Garden, June 26, 1880. [G.]
PRECENTOR (Greek, Protopsaltes and Ca-
nonarcha ; French, Grand Ckantre ; Spanish,
Chantre, Caput scholae or Capiscol ; German, Pri-
micier; at Cologne, Chorepiscopus). The director
of the choir in a cathedral, collegiate, or monastic
church. In the English cathedrals of the old
foundation, as well as in the cathedrals of France,
Spain, and Germany, the Precentor was always a
dignitary, and ranked next to the Dean, although
in a few instances the Archdeacons preceded him.
At Exeter the Precentor installed the Canons ;
at York he installed the Dean and other dig
nitaries ; and at Lichfield even the Bishop re
ceived visible possession of his office from his
hands. At Paris the Precentor of Notre Dame
divided with the Chancellor the supervision
PREGHIERA.
27
of the schools and teachers in the city, and of the
respondents in the university. The dignity of
Precentor was established at Exeter, Salisbury,
York, and Lincoln in the nth century; at
Rouen, Amiens, Chichester, Wells, Lichfield, and
Hereford in the I2th century ; and at St. David's
and St. Paul's (London) in the I3th century. In
cathedrals of the new foundation (with the excep
tion of Christ Church, Dublin) the Precentor is a
minor canon appointed by the Dean and Chapter,
and removable at their pleasure. The duties of the
Precentor were to conduct the musical portion of
the service, to superintend the choir generally, to
distribute copes and regulate processions ; on Sun
days and great festivals to begin the hymns,
responses, etc., and at Mass to give the note to
the Bishop and Dean, as the Succentor did to the
canons and clerks. In monasteries the Precentor
had similar duties, and was in addition generally
chief librarian and registrar, as well as super
intendent of much of the ecclesiastical discipline
of the establishment. In some French cathedrals
he carries a silver or white staff, as the badge of
his dignity. In the Anglican Church his duties
are to superintend the musical portions of the
service, and he has the general management of
the choir. His stall in the cathedral corresponds
with that of the Dean. (Walcott, ' Sacred Archae
ology ' ; Hook, ' Church Dictionary.') [W. B. S.]
PRECIOSA. A play in 4 acts by P. A. Wolff,
with overture and music by Weber ; music com
pleted July 15, 1820- Produced in Berlin, Mar.
14, 1821, at the Royal Opera-house. In Paris,
in 1825, at the Ode"on, adapted and arranged by
Sauvage and Cremont ; and April 16, 1858, at
Theatre Lyrique, reduced to one act by Nuitter
and Beaumont. In London, in English, at Covent
Garden, April 28, 1825.
In the autograph of the overture the March
is stated to be from a real gipsy melody. [Gr.]
PREDIERI, LUC-ANTONIO, born at Bologna,
Sept. 13, 1688, became maestro di capella of the
cathedral, and on the recommendation of Fux
was appointed by the Emperor Charles VI. vice-
Capellmeister of the court-chapel at Vienna in
Feb. 1 739. He was promoted to the chief Capell-
meistership in 1746, but dismissed in 1751 with
title and full salary, apparently in favour of
Reutter. He returned to Bologna, and died there
in 1769. Among the MSS. of the Gesellschaft
der Musikfreunde at Vienna are many scores of
his operas, oratorios, feste di camera, serenatas,
etc., which pleased in their day, and were for the
most part produced at court. [C. F.P.]
PREGHIERA, a prayer. A name which
some modern writers for the pianoforte (Rubin
stein among them) have chosen to prefix to
drawing-room pieces, consisting, as a rule, of a
well-defined melody, adorned with more or less
showy passages. The form of piece is, as its
name implies, supposed to be solemn in character,
but the display which for some unaccountable
reason is seldom separate from it quite destroys
any devotional feeling which may have given rise
to the piece and to its name. [J.A. F.M.]
23
PREINDL.
PREINDL, JOSEPH, born 1758 at Marbach
on the Danube, a pupil of Albrechtsberger in
Vienna, became in 1790 choirmaster of the
Peterskirche, and in 1809 Capellmeister of St.
Stephen's, in which post he died Oct. 26, 1823.
He was a solid and correct composer, a skilled
pianist and organist, and a valued teacher of
singing. His compositions include masses, a
requiem, smaller church pieces, and pianoforte
and organ-music, partly published in Vienna.
He also printed a ' Gesanglehre ' (2nd ed. Stei-
ner), and ' Melodien aller deutschen Kirchen-
lieder welche in St. Stephansdom in Wien
gesungen werden,' with cadences, symphonies,
and preludes, for organ or pianoforte (Diabelli,
3rd ed. revised and enlarged by Sechter). Sey-
fried edited his posthumous work ' Wiener Ton-
schule,' a method of instruction in harmony,
counterpoint, and fugue (Haslinger, 1827; 2nd
ed. 1832). [C.F.P.]
PRELLEUR, PETER, was of French extrac
tion and in early life a writing master. About
1728 he was elected organist of St. Alban, Wood
Street, and shortly afterwards engaged to play
the harpsichord at Goodman's Fields Theatre,
which he continued to do until the suppression of
the theatre under the Licensing Act in 1 737, com
posing also the dances and occasional music. In
1730 he published ' The Modern Musick Master,
or, the Universal Musician/ containing an intro
duction to singing, instructions for playing the
flute, German flute, hautboy, violin, and harpsi
chord, with a brief History of Music, and a
Musical Dictionary. In 1735 he was elected
the first organist of Christ Church, Spitalfields.
After the closing of Goodman's Fields Theatre
he was engaged at a newly opened place of
entertainment in Leman Street close by, called
the New Wells, for which he composed some
songs, and an interlude entitled 'Baucis and
Philemon,' containing a good overture and some
pleasing songs and duets, the score of which he
published. Fifteen hymn tunes by him were
included in a collection of twenty-four published
by one Moze, an organist, in 1758, under the
title of 'Divine Melody,' in which he is spoken
of as if then dead. [W. H. H.]
PRELUDE (Fr. Prdude; It. Preludio; Lat.
Preludium; Ger. Vorspiel). A preliminary move
ment, ostensibly an introduction to the main body
of a work, but frequently of intrinsic and indepen
dent value and importance. [See INTRODUCTION,
OVERTURE.] The term is rarely used in connec
tion with oratorio^ cantata, or opera, either as a
synonym for overture or as a title for the in
strumental introduction taking the place of an
overture in regular form. Wagner, however,
employs the word Vorspiel in the majority of
his music dramas, notably in ' Lohengrin ' and
' Die Meistersinger.' In each of these several
instances the movement so denominated is not
only of extreme significance, but is capable, like
an overture, of being performed apart from the
opera. In ' Tristan und Isolde ' he prefers
Einleitung (Introduction), but in the four sections
PRELUDE.
of ' Der Ring des Nibelungen ' we have Vorspiel,
and the terms in an operatic sense may be con
sidered practically interchangeable.
The Prelude was for a long period a charac
teristic portion of the Sonata or Suite. For
example, Corelli in his ' Sonate da Camera,3 com
mences almost invariably with a Preludio, that
is, an introduction of 8, 12, or 16 bars, largo or
adagio, leading generally into an Allemande.
In the works of Corelli's • successors, Italian and
German, we find the Prelude more developed, but
it seems to have been a matter of choice with the
composer whether a movement so named should
precede the Allemande. Bach, whose command
ing genius led him to improve upon the lines of
his predecessors, has left some masterly preludes
in what is generally known as the ancient binary
or sonata form ; these movements being as im
portant and interesting as any in his suites. [See
SONATA, SUITE.] But the term is used in another
sense, which must be dealt with here — that is, as
a title to the movement introductory to a fugue.
The Wohltemperirte Clavier of Bach affords
a great variety of forms and styles included
under the same heading. In some instances, as
for example Book I. No. i in C, No. 2 in C
minor, and No. 3 in Cj, the prelude is a mere
study in arpeggios ; in others it is in regular
form, as in Book II. No. 5 in D and No. 9 in E.
Sometimes it is of greater length than the suc
ceeding fugue, of which Book II. No. 17 in Ab,
is an instance in point.
The organ preludes of Bach are of far greater
interest than even his masterly compositions for
the clavichord. In Book II. of the complete organ
works there are some magnificent preludes, es
pecially those in A minor, E minor, G minor and
B minor. The contrapuntal ingenuity and musical
beauty of the one last-named are greater than
they are in the fugue following. But perhaps
the finest of the entire series is that in Eb,
Book III., associated with the fugue popularly
known as ' St. Ann's/ The form of the move
ment is very nearly that of the modern rondo,
and in regard to symmetrical proportion, melodic
beauty, and depth of feeling, it has few rivals in
the instrumental works of any composer. But a
lengthy treatise might be penned on the organ
preludes of John Sebastian JBach. Among the
multitudinous imitations by recent composers
the three preludes of Mendelssohn in op. 37 hold
the foremost place. His six Preludes (and Fugues)
for piano (op. 35) are also interesting, more
especially that in E minor No. I, which almost
deserves a place among the 'Lieder ohne Worte/
Chopin, who was a law unto himself in many
things, has left a series of Preludes, each of which
is complete in itself, and not intended as an
introduction to something else. The apparent
anomaly may be forgiven, out of consideration to
the originality of the pieces, which whether they
were suggested by his visit to Majorca or not,
are among the most characteristic of Chopin's
compositions. It will be seen by the foregoing
remarks that the title of Prelude has never been
associated with any particular form in music, but
PRELUDE.
PREVOST.
29
is equally applicable to a phrase of a few bars or
an extended composition in strict or free style.
Occasionally the synonymous word PREAM-
BULUM is employed, of which the most salient
modern instance occurs in Schumann's ' Carnaval,'
op. 9. Prelude is sometimes used to signify the
introductory bars of symphony in a song or other
vocal piece ; also the brief improvisation of a player
before commencing his performance proper. Bee
thoven's two Preludes through the 12 keys, op.
39, are in the improvisatory style. [H.F.F.]
PRELUDES, LES. The third of Liszt's
' Symphonic Poems ' (Symphonische Dichtnngen)
for full orchestra ; probably composed in the
winter of 1849, and first performed at Weimar,
Feb. 23, 1854. [G-]
PREPARATION. The possibility of using a
very large proportion of the dissonant combina
tions in music was only discovered at first through
the process of 'suspension,' which amounts to the
delaying of the progression of a part or voice out of
a concordant combination while the other parts
move on to a fresh combination ; so that until
the delayed part moves also to its destination a
dissonance is heard. As long as the parts which
have moved first wait for the suspended notes to
move into their places before moving further, the
group belongs to the order of ordinary suspensions
(Ex. i) ; but when they move again while the
part which was as it were left behind moves into
its place, a different class of discords is created
(Ex. 2). In both these cases the sounding of the
Ex.1.
Ex.2.
A * * «
Jm
• •
1(1)
"V (^
,
•
•) r r
r ' r
* V
En
'• • £=>
P
I
K
. 19
discordant note in the previous combination (i. e.
the upper C in the first chord of both examples)
is called the 'preparation' of the discord, and the
latter class are sometimes distinguished especially
as prepared discords. The note which prepares
a discord must be ultimately capable of being
taken without preparation ; hence for a long-
while only absolutely concordant notes could be
used for the purpose. But when by degrees the
Dominant seventh, and later the major and
minor ninths of the Dominant, and some similarly
constructed chromatic chords of seventh and ninth,
came to be used as freely as concords, their dis
cordant notes became equally available to prepare
less privileged discords. [C.H.H.P.]
PRESA (literally, 'a Taking'). A sign, used
to indicate the places at which the Guida (or
Subject) of a Canon is to be taken up by the
several Voices.
The following are the forms most frequently
adopted : —
•S- :S: '$' + %
In the famous ' Enimme,' or ^Enigmatical
Canons, of the I5th and i6th centuries, an In
scription is usually substituted for the Presa,
though in many cases even this is wanting, and
the Singer is left without assistance. [See INSCRIP
TION.] [W.S.R.]
PRESTISSIMO, ' very quickly,' indicates the
highest rate of speed used in music. It is used,
like Presto, generally for the whole movement,
which is as a rule the finale. Examples in
Beethoven's sonatas are, Op. 2, No. i, and
Op. 53. It is used for the second movement of
Op. 109. [J.A.F.M.]
PRESTO, 'fast,' indicates a rate of speed
quicker than allegro, or any other sign except
prestissimo. It is generally used at the begin
ning of movements, such movements being as
a rule the last of the work, or the finale, as for
instance, Beethoven's sonatas, Op. 10, No. 2; Op.
27, No. 2 ; Op. 31, No. 3. It is used as the ist
movement in Sonata, Op. 10, No. 3, and in Op.
79. When the time becomes faster in the
middle of a movement, Piti presto is used, as for
instance in Beethoven's Quartet in Eb (Op. 74),
3rd movement (Presto), where the direction for
the part of the movement that serves as the trio
is ' Piu presto quasi prestissimo.' A curious
instance of the use of this direction is in the
pianoforte sonata of Schumann, Op. 22, where
the ist movement is headed 'II piu presto
possibile,' and in German below 'So rasch wie
mbglich.' At 41 bars from the end of the move
ment comes 'Piu mosso," translated 'Schneller,'
and again, 25 bars from the end, ' Ancora piu.
mosso,' ' Noch schneller.' [J.A.F.M.]
PREVOST, EUGENE, born in Paris, Aug. 23,
1809, studied harmony and counterpoint at the
Conservatoire with Seuriot and Jelensperger,
and composition with Lesueur ; took the second
Grand prix in 1829, and the Prix de Rome in
1831 for his cantata ' Bianca Capella.' Previous
to this he had produced 'L'Hotel des Princes,'
and 'Le Grenadier de Wagram' — i-act pieces
containing pretty music — both with success, at
the Ambigu-Comique. On his return from
Italy, 'Cosimo,' an ope'ra-bouffe in 2 acts, was
well received at the Opera Comique, and followed
by ' Le bon Gar9on,' I act, of no remarkable
merit. After his marriage with Eleonore Colon,
sister of the favourite singer Jenny Colon, PreVost
left Paris to become conductor of the theatre
at Havre. His unusually retentive memory
proved a disadvantage in this post, for in con
stantly studying the works of others he lost his
originality. In 1838 he left Havre for New
Orleans, where he remained 20 years. He was
in great request as a singing-master, conducted
the French theatre at New Orleans, and produced
with marked success a mass for full orchestra, and
several dramatic works, including ' Esmeralda,'
which contained some striking music. None of
these were engraved. When the war broke out
he returned to Paris, and became favourably
known as a conductor. He directed the concerts
of the Champs Elysees, and the fantasias which he
arranged for them show great skill in orchestration.
30
PROVOST.
'L'lllustre Gaspard' (i act) was produced at the
Op^ra Comique (Feb. IT, 1863), but the fellow
pupil of Berlioz, Reber, and A. Thomas, had vir
tually fallen out of the race. His son Leon, also a
good conductor, recalled him to New Orleans,
where he settled finally towards the end of 1867,
and died July 1872. [G.C.]
PREYER, GOTTFRIED, born at Hausbrunn in
Lower Austria, March 15, 1808. He studied at
Vienna with Sechter, became in 1835 organist of
the Reformed Church, in 1844 supernumerary
vice-Capellmeister to the court, in 1846 court-
organist, in 1862 vice-Capellmeister, and retired
on a pension in 1876. Since 1853 he has been,
and still is (1880), Capellmeister of the Cathedral.
His connection with the Conservatorium dates
from 1838, when he became professor of harmony
and counterpoint, and conductor of the pupils'
concerts ; from 1844 to 48 he directed the insti
tution. The Tonkunstler-Societat performed his
oratorio 'Noah' in 1842, 45, and 51. He has
printed a symphony, op. 16 (Diabelli); several
masses and smaller church pieces ; music for
pianoforte and organ, choruses, and a large quan
tity of popular Lieder (chiefly Diabelli) ; and
' Hymns for the Orthodox Greek Church,' in 3
vols., Vienna, 1847 ; a grand mass for four male
voices with organ, op. 76, etc. He has a grand
opera among his MSS. [C.F.P.]
PRICK SONG. The name given by old
writers upon music to divisions or descant upon
a Plain-song or Ground, which were written,
or pricked, down, in contradistinction to those
which were performed extemporaneously. (See
Morley's Introduction, Second Part.) The term
is derived from the word 'prick,' as used to ex
press the point or dot forming the head of the
note. Shakspere (Romeo and Juliet, Act ii.
Sc. 4) makes Mercutio describe Tybalt as one
who 'fights as you sing prick song, keeps time,
distance, and proportion ; rests me his minim rest
one, two, and the third in your bosom.' The
term 'pricking of musick bookes' was formerly
employed to express the writing of them. Pay
ments for so doing are frequently found in the ac
counts of cathedral and college choirs. [W.H. H.]
PRIEST, JOSIAS, a dancing-master connected
with the theatres in the last quarter of the 1 7th
century, who also kept a boarding-school for
gentlewomen in Leicester Fields, which he re
moved in 1680 to Chelsea. Priest's claim to
notice is his having engaged Henry Purcell to
compose his first opera, 'Dido and ^Eneas,' for
performance at his school. He invented the
dances for Purcell's operas, 'The Prophetess,'
' King Arthur,' and 'The Fairy Queen,' and other
pieces. [W. H. H.]
PRIME (Lat. Prima ; Hora prima. Officium
(vel Oratio) ad Horam primam). The first of
the 'Lesser Hours ' in the Roman Breviary.
The Office of Prime consists of the Versicle
and Response, 'Deus in adjutorium'; a Hymn,
' Te lucis orto sidere,' which never changes ;
and three Psalms, sung under a single Antiphon.
PRINCE DE LA MOSKOWA.
These are followed, on Sundays, by the Hymn
'Quicunque vult,' commonly called the Creed of
S. Athanasius. On other occasions the Antiphon
is immediately succeeded by the Capitulum and
Responsorium breve. The disposition of the
next division of the Office, including the Preces
and the Martyrologium for the day, depends
entirely upon the rank of the Festival on which
it is sung. Certain Prayers are said, next in
order ; and the whole concludes with the Lectio
brevis and the Benediction.
The Plain Chaunt Music for Prime will be
found in the ' Antiphonarium Romanum ' and
the ' Directorium Chori.' [W.S.R.]
PRIMER — from primus, first — a first or ele
mentary book for beginners. The first of Messrs.
Novello & Go's. Music Primers, edited by Dr.
Stainer, was issued Aug. I, 1877, and the
following have appeared to Dec. 31, 1880: —
Pianoforte (Pauer), Rudiments of Music (Cum-
mings),0rgan (Stainer), Harmonium (King Hall),
Singing (Randegger), Speech in Song (Ellis),
Musical Forms (Pauer), Harmony (Stainer),
Counterpoint (Bridge), Fugue (Higgs), Scientific
Basis of Music (Stone), Church-Choir Training
(Troutbeck), Plain Song (Helmore), Instrumen
tation (Prout), Elements of the Beautiful in
Music (Pauer), The Violin (Berthold Tours),
Tonic Sol-fa (J. Curwen), Lancashire Sol-fa
(Greenwood), Composition (Stainer), Musical
Terms (Stainer and Barrett).
That on Pianoforte Playing by Mr. Franklin
Taylor forms one of Messrs. Macmillan's series
of Shilling Primers, and was issued Sept. 26, 1877.
(Published inGerman by J.J.Weber, Leipzig.) [G.j
PRIMO, 'first,' is used in two ways in music,
(i) In pianoforte duets, Primo or imo is gene
rally put over the right-hand page, and then
means the part taken by the ' treble ' player,
while Secondo or 2do is put over that for the
' bass.' (2) In the reprise of the first section of a
movement, a few bars are often necessary before
the double-bar to lead back to the repetition,
which are not required the second time of play
ing the section. The words Primo, imo, ima
volta, or 1st time are then put over all these
bars, so that when the repeated portion reaches
this direction, the player goes on to the part
after the double-bar, leaving out the bars over
which ' Primo ' is written. The first few bars
after the double-bar are frequently, but not
always, labelled Secondo, 2do, or 2nd time. The
'Primo' varies greatly in length. Beethoven
often does without it at all (C minor and Pastoral
Symphonies) ; in his No. 2 Symphony it is 2 bars
long, in his No. 4 it is 14 bars long, and in Men
delssohn's Italian Symphony 23 bars (ist move
ment in all cases). [J.A.F.M.]
PRINCE DE LA MOSKOWA, JOSEPH NAPO
LEON NET, eldest son of Marshal Ney, born in
Paris, May 8, 1803. As a lad he showed great
aptitude for music, and composed a mass, which
was performed at Lucca, where he lived after
his father's death. In 1831 he was made 'Pair
de France,' but sought distinction in a totally
PRINCE DE LA MOSKOWA.
PRINCIPAL.
31
different line from that of his brother the Due
d'Elchingen. He contributed to various period
icals, especially some articles in the ' Revue des
deux Mondes ' and the ' Constitutional,' which
excited considerable interest. His love of sport
was great, and he was one of the founders of the
Jockey Club of Paris. In 1828 he married the
only daughter of Laffitte, the banker. The ser
vices rendered by the Prince to music are con
siderable. In connexion with Adolphe Adam he
founded the ' Socie"te des Concerts de musique
religieuse et classique,' an association for the
practice of vocal music, and to this he devoted
a great amount of learning, taste, and judgment.
We append a catalogue of the works contained
in this fine collection (n vols. 8vo.), published
for the Society by the Prince, which has now
become very scarce.1 The Prince lived on in
timate terms with Delsarte the singer, and
with Niedermeyer the composer, whom he ma
terially assisted in the foundation of his ' Ecole
de musique religieuse.' In 1831 a mass of his
for voices and orchestra was executed by the
pupils of Choron, and called forth the strong
encomiums of M. Fe'tis. Although naturally
inclined to the madrigal style and sacred music,
he also attempted the theatre, producing at the
Ope'ra Comique, ' Le Cent - Suisse ' (June 7,
1840), a one-act piece, which had a considerable
run, and 'Yvonne' (March 16, 1855), a one-act
op^ra comique, a clever imitation of the antique
style. The Prince died July 25, 1857, at St.
Germain-en-Laye.
Recueil des morceaux de mu.iique ancienne, etc.,
vols. i to xi, 8vo.
Allegri . . . .
Do
Anerio . . . .
Do
Anonymous . .
Do
Do
Do
Do
Arcadelt . . .
Do
J.Sebastian Bach
Do
Barbieri . . .
Benevoli . . .
Buononcini . .
Carissimi . . .
Do
Do
Do
Clari
Do
Do
Do
Du Caurroy . .
Colonna . . .
Donate ....
Don Juan IV. .
Durante . . .
Gabrieli A, . .
Do.
Do.
Gabrieli G.
Do.
Callus
Do.
Do.
Gastoldi . . .
Gesualdo . . .
Do
Gibbons, Orlando
De Lamentatlone Jeremise, 4 4 .... il. 153
Miserere, '2 choirs ii. 168
Ave regina coelorum, 2 choirs vi. 18S
Adoramus, a 4 vi. 203
Songs of the Moravian Brothers, a 4 . . ii. 235
Alia Trinita beata, a 4 ii. 248
Belle qui tiens ma vie. Pavane a 4 ... v. 82
From an old Noel, sop. solo and chor. . . x. 95
Se questa valle di miseria x. 115
Ave Maria, a 4 ii. 251
II bianco e dolce cigno, a 4 v. 97
Tantum ergo, a 4 ii. 279
Qui presso (Matthew Passion) iv. 426
Veni de Libano, a 6 vi. 271
Sanctus, a 16 xi. 289
In te Domine, a 4 viii. 461
0 1'elix anima, a 3 vi. 266
Gaudeamus, a 4 viii. 429
Surgamus, eamus, a 3 viii. 450
Conjugation of hie and hoc, a 4 .... xi. 309
Cantando un dl, 4 2 .......... jjj. 295
Non te sdegnar, a 2 m. 303
Addio compagne amene, a3 ii. 312
Gratias agimus, a 5 viij. 535
Noel ! Noel ! a 4 x. 107
Domine, a 5 viii. 478
Villote neapolitana, a 4 x. 119
Crux fidelis, a 4 vi. 263
Christe eleison, a 4 vi. 278
Magnificat, 3 choirs vi. 135
Benedictus, do vi. 163
Sento un rumor, a 8 xi. 389
Magnificat, a 8 ix. 105
Miserere, a 6 ix. 129
Media vita, 2 choirs vi. 211
Adoramus, a 6 vi. 223
Eccequomodo moritur Justus, a 4 ... vi. 228
Vivsr lieto voglio, a 5 x. 123
Gelo ha ma donna, a 5 v. 102
Come esser suo, a 5 v. 108
Le vieux chasseur (I tremble not) ... xi. 357
There is a espy of this Collection in the British Museum,
Gibbons, Orlando Le croise1 captif (The silver swan)
ii. 369
Gluck
Handel .
Do. .
Do. .
Do. .
Do. .
Haydn .
Do. .
Do. .
Do. .
Do. .
Do. .
Do. .
Jannequin
Do. .
Josquin des Pre"s
Leisring
Madrigal (Orphf!e) iii. 399
Lascia ch'io pianga, aria iii. 341
Ah ! mio cor, aria (Alcina) iii. 346
Tutta raccolta ancor, aria iii. 352
Che vai cercando, duet iii. 355
Alleluia, chorus iii. 375
E Dio, air (Creation) iv. 444
Trio and chorus (Creation) iv. 459
Insanse et vanse curse, a 4 iv. 483
Vidit suum dulcem natum, air (Stabat) . iv. 515
Fac me vere, air (Stabat) iv. 520
Virgo virginum, 4tet (Stabat) iv. 527
Quando corpus, 4tet and chorus (Stabat) . jy. 58
Labataille de MarignaYi, a 4 v. 13
Le chant des oiseaux, a 4 xl. 333
La defloration de Jean Ockeghem, chorus v. 2
O filii, 2 choirs ii. 26
Leo Sicut erat, a 10 viii. 489
Lotti Spirto di Dio, madrigal, a 4
Do.
Do. .
Do. .
Lupus .
Maill art
Marcello
Do. .
Do. .
Marenzio
Nanini .
Orlando Lasso
Miserere, a 4 . . .
Benedictus, a 4 . .
Christe Eleison, a 5
v. 120
x. 51
x. 79
xl. 305
Audivi vocem, a 6 vi. 233
' Tout au rebours,' Canon a 5 xi. 382
Donde cotanto fremito. chorus .... iii. 322
I cieli immensi, solo and chorus .... iii. 333
Ei fuor dell' acque, a 3 bassi v. 114
Ahi dispietata xi. 442
Diffusa est, motet, a 4 vi. 173
Regina cceli, a 4 ii. 186
Do Salve regina, a 4
Do. . Miserere, a 4
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Sais-tudirel'Ave? a4. . . .
Si le long temps, a 4 ....
Ce faux amour, a 4
Fuyons tous d'amour le jeu, a 4
Do Bonjour mon cceur, a 4
Do Le temps peut bien, a 4
ii. 192
ii. 199
v.42
v. 44
v. 49
v. 55
V. 56
V.6S
T. 67
v. 73
v. 76
vi. 176
ix. 150
i. 1
i. 69
1.105
i. 131
1.144
i. 146
1.149
v.85
v. 92
vii. 282
Do Je 1'aime bien, a 4
Do. . . . , Si vous n'6tes en bon point, a 4 ...
Do Per pianto, madrigal, a 5
Do Quia cinerem, a 5
Do De Psalmls poenitentialibus.a 3 and a 4
Palestrina . . . Messe du pape Marcell, a 6
Do Messe ' Sterna Christ!,' a 4 ....
Do Stabat, 2 choirs
Do Fratres ego enim, 2 choirs
Do Adoramus, a 4
Do Pleni sunt, a 3
Do Alia riva del Tebro, madrigal, a 4. . .
Do Vaghi pensier, a 4
Do La ver 1'aurora, a 4
Do Tribularer si nescirem, a 6
Do Agnus Dei, a 8 vii. 312
Do Popule meus, 2 choirs vii. 331
Do Canite tuba, a 5 vii. 351
Do Vinea mea, a 4 vii. 355
Do Una hora, a 4 vii. 355
Do Tantum ergo, a 5 vii. 363
Do In monte Oliveti, a 4 vii. 367
Do Tristis est anima, a 4 vii. 378
Do Esurientes, a 5 vii. 373
Do Corporis mysterium, a 4 vii. 383
Do O bone Jesu, a 4 vii. 388
Do Sicut erat, a 6 vii. 390
Do Dei mater alma, a 4 vii. 369
Do Lauda anima, a 5 vii. 399
Do Hodie Christus natus est, 2 choirs . . . vii. 407
Do. .... Gloria Patri, 2 choirs vii. 426
Do Missa canonica, a 4
Do Requiem, a 5
Do. . .
Do. . .
Do. . .
Do. . .
Do. . .
Scarlatti .
Stradella .
Tall is . .
Vittoria .
Do. . .
Do. . .
Do.
ix. 1
ix. 49
x.l
x. 11
X. 17
x. 23
x. 31
ii. 269
Dies sanctiflcatus, a 4
Sicut cervus, a 4
Idem (in Ah)
Laus, honor, a 6
Veni sponsa, a 4
Cor mio, madrigal a 5
Pieta, Signore, aria iii. 283
Kyrie eleison, a 4 iii. 283
Jesu dulcis memoria, a 4 vi. 207
Pueri Hebrseorum, a 4 ii. 254
O vos omnes, a 4 ii. 259
Gloria Patria, a 6 vi. 253
Do O quam gloriosum, a 4 vi, 259
Do Vere languores, a 4 x. 45
Vulpius . . . Exultate justi, &4 vi. 240
[G.C.]
PRINCIPAL. A word with various mean
ings.
I. An organ stop. In Germany the term
is very properly applied to the most important
32
PEINCIPAL.
8-feet stops of open flue-pipes on the manuals,
and to open i6-feet stops on the pedals, thu
corresponding to our ; open diapasons.' But in
this country the Principal is, with very few
exceptions, the chief open metal stop of 4-feel
pitch, and should more properly be termed an
Octave or Principal octave, since it sounds an
octave above the diapasons. [J.S.
II. PRINCIPAL or PRINZIPALE. A term
employed in many of Handel's scores for the
third trumpet part. This is not usually in
unison with the first and second trumpets, which
are designated as Tromba imo and 2Bdo. It is
often written for in the old soprano clef with C
on the lowest line, and has a range somewhat
lower than the trombe. The older works on in
strumentation, such as those of Schilling, Koch,
Schladebach and Lichtenthal, recognise the dif
ference and draw a distinction between ' Principal-
Stimme' and ' Clarin-Stimme.' It is obvious
that whereas the tromba or clarino represented
the old small-bored instrument now obsolete, for
which the majority of Handel's and Bach's high
and difficult solos were composed, the Principal,
in tone and compass, more nearly resembled the
modern large-bored military trumpet. The con
trast can easily be recognised by an examination
of the overture to the Occasional Oratorio
Arnold's edition, or that of the Dettingen Te
Deum as published by the German Handel
Society. In the latter the old soprano, in the
former the usual treble clef, is adopted.
III. Principals, in modern musical language, are
the solo singers or players in a concert. [W.H.S.]
PEING, JACOB CUBITT, Mus. Bac. ; JOSEPH,
Mus. Doc.; and ISAAC, Mus. Bac., sons of James
Pring, were all choristers of St. Paul's under
Robert Hudson.
JACOB CUBITT PRING, born at Lewisham in
1771, was organist of St. Botolph, Aldgate. He
graduated at Oxford in 1797, was the composer
of several anthems, glees, and other vocal pieces,
and one of the founders of the Concentores So-
dales. He published a set of eight anthems.
Seven glees and a catch by him are included in
Warren's Collections. He died 1 799.
JOSEPH PRING, born at Kensington, Jan. 15,
1776, was on April i, 1793 appointed organist
of Bangor Cathedral on the resignation of Olive,
but not formally elected until Sept. ?8, 1810.
In 1805 he published 'Twenty Anthems,' and
on Jan. 27, 1808 accumulated the degrees of
Mus. Bac. and Mus. Doc. at Oxford. In June
1813 he and three of the vicars-choral of Bangor
Cathedral presented a petition to the Court" of
Chancery for the proper application of certain
tithes which had, by an act of Parliament passed
in 1685, been appropriated for the maintenance
of the cathedral choir, but had been diverted by
the capitular body to other purposes. The suit
lasted until 1819, when Lord Chancellor Eldon,
setting at naught the express provisions of the
Act, sanctioned a scheme, which indeed gave to
the organist and choir increased stipends, but
yet kept them considerably below the amounts
they would have received if the Act had been
PROFESSOR.
fully carried out. Dr. Pring, in 1819, printed
copies of the proceedings in the suit, and other
documents, with annotations, forming a history
of the transactions, which has long been a scarce
book. He died at Bangor, Feb. 13, 1842.
ISAAC PRING, born at Kensington, 1777, be
came in 1794 assistant organist to Dr. Philip
Hayes at Oxford, and on his death in 1797
succeeded him as organist of New College.
He graduated at Oxford in March, 1799, an(^
died of consumption Oct. 18, in the same
year. [W.H.H.]
PROCH, HEINRICH, well-known composer of
Lieder, Capellmeister, and teacher of singing,
born July 22, 1809, in Vienna ; was destined for
the law, but studied the violin with enthusiasm,
and in 1833-34 frequently played- in public in
Vienna. He became in 1837 Capellmeister of
the Josephstadt theatre, Vienna, and in 1840
of the Court opera, retiring with a pension in
1870. On the foundation of the shortlived Comic
Opera in 1874 he was appointed its Capellmeister.
His popularity is mainly due to his Lieder,
among the best-known of which we may cite
'Das Alpenhorn.' He trained a large number
of celebrated singers — among others Dustmann,
Csillag, and Tietjens. Several good German
translations of Italian operas — the Trovatore for
example — are from his pen. Proch died Dec. 18,
1878. His daughter LOUISE is a singer and
actress of some ability, with a powerful mezzo-
soprano voice. [F.G.]
PRODIGAL SON, THE. An oratorio by
Arthur Sullivan, composed for the Worcester
Festival, 1869, and produced there Sept. 8. The
subject has been treated by Gaveaux, Auber, and
others, under the title of 'L'Enfant prodigue';
and by Ponchielli, whose 'Figliuol prodigo' was
produced at the Scala, Milan, Dec. 26, 1880.
[See vol. i. 488 a.] [G.]
PROFESSOR. At Oxford, the Professorship
of Music was founded by Dr. William Heather
in 1626. The first Professors were college
O
organists, not known outside the University.
Crotch, who took the office in 1797, and held it
till 1848, was the first musician of eminence.
His successor was Bishop. The present Professor,
Sir F. A.G.Ouseley, Bt.,was appointed on Bishop's
death in 1855. During a long period the office
was a sinecure. In the reforms carried out about
25 years ago, it was attempted to restore reality to
the School of Music at Oxford by requiring the
Professor to lecture at least once in each term,
and by instituting musical performances under
the superintendence of the Choragus. [See CHO-
RAGUS.] The latter part of the scheme has totally
failed; so that the Professor's lectures, about
three a year, and the examinations for Musical
degrees, are the only form in which the Uni
versity advances the study of music. The terminal
lectures, which are usually illustrated by an
orchestra, bear rather the character of an inter
esting public entertainment than that of technical
nstruction. The more strictly academic work
of the Professor consists in the examination for
PROFESSOR.
Musical degrees. [See DEGREES.] The endow
ment of the chair is little more than nominal.
The Cambridge Professorship was founded by
the University in 1684, and has been held by
Staggins (1684), Tudway (1705), Greene (1730),
Randall (1755), Hague (1799), Clarke -Whitfeld
(1821), Walmisley (1836), Sterndale Bennett
(1856), andG. A. Macfarren (1875), successively.
The duties, like those at Oxford, consist chiefly
in examining candidates for Musical degrees, and
in prescribing those objects of musical study in
which changes are made from time to time. The
salary of the Professor is £200 per annum.
The Edinburgh Professorship was endowed by
General Reid in 1839. The Professor is ap
pointed by the University Court. Sir Herbert
Oakeley, the present occupant of the chair, was
elected in 1865 : his predecessors were John
Thomson, 1839; Sir H. R. Bishop, 1841; H.
H. Pierson, 1844; John Donaldson, 1845. Un
like the non-resident Professors at Oxford and
Cambridge, the Professor at Edinburgh is a mem
ber of the educational staff of the University. He
receives a salary of £420 per annum, and a further
sum of £200 per annum is allowed for assistants
and for class-expenses. There is a regular double
course of musical instruction : — (i) Lectures by
the Professor on the history and development of the
art and science of music ; the various schools and
styles ; the history and construction of the prin
cipal musical instruments ; the modern orchestra,
etc., or on the works of the great masters. Or
gan performances, with instructive remarks in
programmes, are given from time to time during
the session. (2) Separate and individual instruc
tion in organ or pianoforte-playing is given to a
certain number of the younger students. To
these the theory of music is practically imparted.
Sir Herbert Oakeley is also president and con
ductor of the Edinburgh University Musical
Society, established in 1867.
The Dublin Professorship was dormant till
1764, when Lord Mornington was appointed.
He held office for ten years, after which time
the Professorship again sank into oblivion. It
was revived in 1 845, in the person of Dr. Smith,
and a few examinations of a rudimentary charac
ter were held, and degrees given. It was, how
ever, reserved for the present Professor, Sir
Robert Stewart, elected in 1862, to raise the
standard of musical science in Dublin by ex
amining in history, counterpoint, orchestration,
and all that is included in modern musical study.
Although the statutory duties of the Professor
are conh'ned to examinations and to the conduct
of business relating to Musical degrees, and
although there exists no endowment at Dublin
like that which defrays class-expenses at Edin
burgh, yet the actual condition of musical study
at Dublin resembles that of Edinburgh rather
than the two English Universities. Sir Robert
Stewart* who is resident at the University, and
is the organist of Trinity College Chapel, both
delivers courses of lectures and imparts practical
instruction by training the University Choral
Society, and conducting the orchestral concerts,
VOL. III. PT. I.
PROGRAMME.
33
which, after weekly rehearsals, are held from
three to five times during the season. The im
portant change lately made at Oxford and Cam
bridge, by introducing literary elements into the
examination for Musical degrees, was effected at
Dublin by the present Professor many years
before. [C.A.F.]
PROGRAMME(from7r/><$,'before,'and7/>a/^a,
' a writing'). A list of the pieces to be performed
at a concert, usually accompanied by the names
of the performers. The term seems to have come
into use in this connexion in the present century,
and is now often further applied to the books
containing the words, and the remarks on the
pieces, which are becoming so usual. It is not
however used for the book of words of an oratorio
or opera.
Programmes are now commonly restricted in
length to 2 hours or 2^. The concerts of the
Philharmonic Societies of London and Vienna,
the Gewandhaus at Leipsic, and the Conservatoire
at Paris, are of that length, usually containing a
symphony and a smaller orchestral piece, a solo
concerto, two or three vocal pieces for solo or
chorus, and one or two overtures. This is some
times divided into two parts, sometimes goes on
without break.
Formerly concerts were of greater length. In the
old days of the Philharmonic two symphonies were
de rigueur, and even such colossi as Beethoven's
Eroica, No. 7, and No. 9, were accompanied by a
symphony of Haydn, Mozart, or Spohr, besides
4 vocal pieces, 2 overtures (the concluding one
often styled a 'Finale'), a concerto, and some
such trifle as Beethoven's Septet. This was a
survival from an older order of things. The
Haydn-Salomon Concerts of 1792-6 contained
each 2 (once at least 3) Symphonies, and a final
orchestral piece, 2 concertos, and 4 vocal pieces ;
and these again were modelled on the programmes
of the petty German Concerts. Jahn in his Life of
Mozart (i. 294) mentions that at Vienna about
1778, Count Firmian's soire'es lasted for 6 hours ;
at one of them 'several symphonies' by Christian
Bach, and four by Martini, were performed ; at
another ' twelve new Violin Concertos ' by Benda.
At a private concert at Dresden, Sept. 21, 1772,
given for the benefit of Dr. Burney (Tour, ii. 44),
the programme was in two parts, each containing
a symphony, a violin solo, a flute concerto, and an
oboe concerto; and, in addition, 'by way of a bonne
boucke, Fischer's well-known rondeau minuet.'
It must be remembered that these pieces were
probably not nearly so long as those which now
go by the same names. Our next instance, how
ever, contains pieces of which we can all judge.
It is the programme of a concert given by
Mozart at Vienna, on March 22, 1783. All the
pieces are by him.
1. The Hafner Symphony (Allegro and Andante).
2. Air from Idomeneo ' Se il padre.' Mad. Lange.
3. PF. Concerto in C.
4. Scena and Aria, ' Misera dove son.' Herr Adam-
berger.
5. Andante grazioso and Rondo allegro, from Serenade
in D ; for orchestra.
6. The favourite PF. Concerto in D.
7. Scena, ' Parto' (Lucio Silla.'. Mad. Teyber.
34
PROGRAMME.
8. Extempore Fantasia on the PF. on an air by Paisiello ;
encored, when Mozart again extemporised on an air
by Gluck (10 variations).
9. Scena and Aria,' Mia speranzaadorata.' Mad. Lange-
10. The Hafner Symphony (Minuet and Finale).
Beethoven indulged in long programmes when
his own compositions were concerned. At the con
cert, in March 1807, at which his Bb Symphony
was first performed, the new work was preceded by
all the three foregoing ones ! Later, on Nov. 29,
1813, he gave the Symphony in A, the 'Glor-
reiche Augenblick' (7 nos.), and the 'Battle of
Vittoria,' in the same programme. But then,
these were his own music, and orchestral con
certs were rare. That his judgment on this
subject, when unbiassed, was as sound as it was
elsewhere, is evident from the note prefixed to
the score of the Eroica Symphony, in which he
requests that it may be played near the begin
ning of the programme, and be accompanied only
by an Overture, an Air and a Concerto, that it
may not fail to produce its ' own intended effect.'
If this was his sober judgment we may doubt
whether he would have approved such a pro
gramme as that in which a great artist lately played
the whole of the five last Sonatas (op. 101, 106,
109, no, in) consecutively, without any relief —
magnificent interpretations, but surely an undue
strain on both player and hearer. A recent
performance of the Choral Symphony twice in
one programme, with an interval of half an hour,
is more excusable, for who ever heard that mag
nificent work without wishing to hear it all over
again ? The arrangement of a programme is not
without its difficulties, as the effect of the pieces
may be much improved by judicious contrast of
the keys, the style, and the nature of the compo
sition. We have elsewhere mentioned Mendels
sohn's fastidious care on these points, and all are
agreed that his Programmes when he conducted at
the Gewandhaus were models. [See vol. ii. 297 6.]
He is said to have proposed to write the music for
an entire Programme, in which he would no doubt
have completely satisfied his canons of taste.
Of Benefit Concerts we say nothing. They
have been known in this country (1840-50) to
contain 40 pieces, played or sung by nearly as
many solo artists, and to last more than 5 hours !
It was once the custom in France, and even
in Germany, occasionally to divide the piece de
resistance of the programme into two, and play
half a symphony at the beginning of the concert
and half at the end. Mozart himself gives an
example in the programme quoted above. But
now-a-days such an attempt would be treated
by any good audience with merited displeasure.
When Beethoven's Violin Concerto was first
played (Dec. 23, 1806) by Clement, to whom it
is dedicated, the selection was as follows : — •
Overture .... Clement
Violin Concerto . . Beethoven
Extempore piece . . Clement
Sonata on one string, with the Violin
reversed.
But the curiosities of programmes are endless. [G.]
PROGRAMME-MUSIC is an epithet origin
ally intended to apply to that small but interest
ing class of music which, while unaccompanied
PROGRAMME MUSIC.
by words, seeks to pourtray. or at least suggest
to the mind, a certain definite series of objects
or events. But the term is also applied, with
deplorable vagueness of meaning, to all dra
matic, characteristic, or imitative music what
ever. It must always remain an open question
how far music is able of itself to influence the
mind's eye, for the simple reason that some
imaginations are vastly more susceptible than
others, and can therefore find vivid pictures
where others see and hear nothing. Also, in
programme-music of all kinds, the imagination
is always turned in the required direction by
the title of the piece, if by nothing else. It is
held by some that music should never seek to
convey anything beyond the ' concourse of sweet
sounds,' or at least should only pourtray states
of feeling. But what is the opinion of the bulk
of audiences, who, though artistically ignorant,
are not of necessity vulgar-minded? To the
uninitiated a symphony is a chaos of sound, re
lieved by scanty bits of ' tune ' ; great then is
their delight when they can find a reason and
a meaning in what is to them like a poem in
a foreign tongue. A cuckoo or a thunderstorm
assists the mind which is endeavouring to conjure
up the required images. And two other facts
should be bDrne in mind : one is that there is a
growing tendency amongst critics and educated
musicians to invent imaginary ' programmes '
where composers have mentioned none — as in
the case of Weber's Concertstiick and Schubert's
C major Symphony, for instance — and another,
that music, when accompanied by words, can never
be too descriptive or dramatic, as in Wagner's
music-dramas and the ' Faust ' of Berlioz.
May it not at least be conceded that though
it is a degradation of art to employ music in
imitating the sounds of nature — illustrious ex
amples to the contrary notwithstanding — it is a
legitimate function of music to assist the mind,
by every means in its power, to conjure up
thoughts of a poetic and idealistic kind ? If this
be granted, programme-music becomes a legiti
mate branch of art, in fact the noblest, the nature
of the programme being the vital point.
The 'Leit-motif is an ingenious device to
overcome the objection that music cannot paint
actualities. If a striking phrase once accom
pany a character or an event in an opera, such a
phrase will surely be ever afterwards identified
with what it first accompanied. The 'Zarniel
motive ' in ' Der Freischiitz ' is a striking and
early example of this association of phrase with
character. [For a full consideration of this sub
ject see LEIT-MOTIF.]
But admirable as this plan may be in opera,
where the eye assists the ear, it cannot be said
that the attempts of Liszt and Berlioz to apply
it to orchestral music have been wholly suc
cessful. It is not enough for the composer to
label his themes in the score and tell us, as in the
'Dante' Symphony for instance, that a mono
tone phrase for Brass instruments represents
'All hope abandon, ye who enter here,' or that
a melodious phrase typifies Francesca da Rimini.
PROGKAMME-MUSIC.
On the other hand, it is quite possible for a
musical piece to follow the general course of a
poem or story, and, if only by evoking similar
states of mind to those induced by considering
the story, to form a fitting musical commentary
on it. Such programme pieces are Sterndale
Bennett's ' Paradise and the Peri ' overture, Von
Billow's 'Sanger's Fluch/ and Liszt's 'Mazeppa.'
But as the extent to which composers have
gone in illustrating their chosen subjects differs
widely, as much as the ' Eroica ' differs from
the 'Battle Symphony,' so it will be well now
to review the list of compositions — not a very
bulky one before the present century — written
with imitative or descriptive intention, and let
each case rest on its own merits.
Becker, in his ' Hausmusik in Deutschland '
mentions possessing a i6-part vocal canon 'on
the approach of Summer/ by a Flemish com
poser of the end of the I5th century, in which
the cuckoo's note is imitated, but given incor
rectly. This incorrectness — D C instead of Eb C
— may perhaps be owing to the fact (discussed
some time ago in the ' Musical Times') that this
bird alters her interval as summer goes on.1 It
is but natural that the cuckoo should have
afforded the earliest as well as the most frequent
subject for musical imitation, as hers is the only
bird's note which is reducible to our scale,
though attempts have been made, as will be
seen further on, to copy some others. Another
canonic part-song, written in 1540 by Lemlin,
'Der Gutzgauch auf dem Zaune sass,' Becker
transcribes at length. Here two voices repeat
the cuckoo's call alternately throughout the
piece. He also quotes a part-song by Antonio
Scandelli (Dresden, 1570) in which the cackling
of a hen laying an egg is comically imitated
thus : ' Ka, ka, ka, ka, ne-ey ! Ka, ka, ka, ka,
ne-ey ! ' More interesting than any of these is the
'Dixieme livre des chansons' (Antwerp, 1545)
to be found in the British Museum, which con
tains 'La Bataille a Quatre de Clem. Jannequin'
(with a 5th part added by Ph. Verdelot), 'Le
chant des oyseaux ' by 1ST. Gombert, ' La chasse
de lievre,' anonymous, and another ' Chasse de
lievre ' by Gombert. Two at least of these part-
songs deserve detailed notice, having been re
cently performed in Paris. The first has been
transcribed in score by Dr. Burney2 in his ' Mu
sical Extracts '(Add. MS. 11,588), and is a descrip
tion of the battle of Marignan. Beginning in the
usual contrapuntal madrigal style with the words
'Escoutez, tous gentilzGallois, la victoire du noble
roy Franfoys/ at the words ' Sonney trompettes
et clairons ' the voices imitate trumpet-calls thus,
PROGRAMME-MUSIC. 35
war-cries. Two bars of quotation will perhaps
convey some idea.
•— "fc 1 1 1-1— 1 i i
•—
— * .
, i
t± — 3 — p —
r i
1
^ •
i *
1 1
i
1
flj chippe choppe torche lorgne
chippe choppe torche
• • <
1 4
*• •
t ~ -i — ' ' P
i r
i
r
• '
1 1 '
i
t i
1 '
pa -ti-pa -toe trique trique trac pa-ti-pa.
Sfr 1 1 i
1
' — 1*1
— r^ —
— fS 1£? —
—p=n
4-?J ' • • J •
1
|
— ^-M
-&)—
pa -ti-pa -toe trique trac
lu i i '
zin zin
trique
"11 h. 1
i i -
1 1
u \n j j
J
— «-J
ni i •
• • t
C •
• • '
' •
•
la pa-ti - pa-toe pa-ti-pa- toe pa
-ti-pa - toe pa-ti - pa-
*"V
i j
. m j
'• 1
h J i
* r
r M 1
2 5
. .«! .
,
• •
* (
Frere-le-le Ian fan, frere-le-le Ian fan
and the assault is described by a copious use of
onomatopeias, such as 'pon, pon, pon/ 'patipatoc/
and ' farirari,' mixed up with exclamations and
1 Spohr, In his Autobiography, has quoted a cuckoo in Switzerland
vhich gave the intermediate note— G, F, E.
i Reprinted in the Prince de la Moskowa's collection.
pa-ti-pa - toe pa-ti-pa - toe pa-ti - pa-
This kind of thing goes on with much spirit for
a long while, ending at last with cries of ' Vic
toire au noble roy Frai^ois ! Escampe toutte
frelon bigot ! ' Jannequin is said to have written
some other descriptive pieces, in the list of which
the 'Chant des oyseaux ' of Gombert is wrongly in
cluded. [See JANNEQUIN.] This latter composition
is chiefly interesting for the manner in which the
articulation of the nightingale is imitated, the song
being thus written down : 'Tar, tar, tar, tar, tar,
fria, fria, tu tu tu, qui lara, qui lara, huit huit
huit huit, oyti oyti, coqui coqui, la vechi la vechi,
ti ti cu ti ti cu titi cu, quiby quiby, tu fouquet
tu fouquet, trop coqu trop coqu,' etc. But it is a
ludicrous idea to attempt an imitation of a bird
by a part-song for Soprano, Alto, Tenor and Bass,
although some slight effort is made to follow the
phrasing of the nightingale's song. The 'Chasse
de lievre ' describes a hunt, but is not otherwise
remarkable.
The old musicians do not display much ori
ginality in their choice of subjects, whether for
imitation or otherwise. * Mr. Bird's Battle ' is
the title of a piece for virginals contained in a
MS. book of W. Byrd's in the Christ Church
Library, Oxford. The several movements are
headed ' The soldiers' summons — the March of
footmen — of horsemen — the Trumpets — the Irish
march — the Bagpipe and Drum — etc.' and the
piece is apparently unfinished. Mention may
also be made of ' La Battaglia ' by Francesco
di Milano (about 1530) and another battle-
piece by an anonymous Flemish composer a
little later. Eckhard or Eccard (1589) is said
to have described in music the hubbub of the
Piazza San Marco at Venice, but details of this
achievement are wanting. The beginning of the
1 7th century gives us an English ' Fantasia on
the weather,1 by John Mundy, professing to de
scribe ' Faire Wether,' 'Lightning,' 'Thunder/
and 'A faire Day.' This is to be seen in 'Queen
Elizabeth's Virginal Book.' The three subjects
quoted overleaf alternate frequently, giving thir
teen changes of weather, and the piece ends
with a few bars expressing ' a cleare day.'
D 2
36
PROGRAMME-MUSIC.
]. Faire wether.
3:
etc.
2. Lightning.
There is also ' A Harmony for 4 Voices ' by
Ravenscroft, ' expressing the five usual Recrea
tions of Hunting, Hawking, Dancing, Drinking,
and Enamouring ' : but here it is probable that
the words only are descriptive. A madrigal by
Leo Leoni (1606) beginning 'Dimmi Clori gen til'
contains an imitation of a nightingale. Then
the Viennese composer Froberger (d. 1667) is
mentioned by several authorities to have had a
marvellous power of pourtraying all kinds of
incidents and ideas in music, but the sole speci
men of his programme-music quoted by Becker
— another battle-piece — is a most feeble produc
tion. Adam Krieger (1667) gives us a four-part
vocal fugue entirely imitative of cats, the subject
being as follows —
mi ------- au,
- - - - - au!
Titles now begin to be more impressive, and the
attempt of Buxtehude (b. 1637) to describe 'the
Nature and Properties of the Planets' in a series
of seven Suites for Clavier would be very ambi
tious had it extended further than the title-page.
Kuhnau's ' Biblische Historien ' are more notice
able. These were six Organ Sonatas describing
various scenes in the sacred narrative. ' David
playing before Saul ' is one — a good musical sub
ject ; ' Jacob's wedding ' is more of a programme
piece, and contains a ' bridal song ' for Rachel.
' Gideon ' is of the usual order of battle-pieces, and
' Israel's death ' is not very descriptive. Burney
gives ' David and Goliath ' and ' The ten plagues
of Egypt ' as the titles of the other two.
Amongst descriptive vocal pieces of this
period should be noticed the Frost scene in
PROGRAMME-MUSIC.
Purcell's ' King Arthur,' in which the odd effect
of shivering and teeth -chattering is rendered by
the chorus. Also the following aria from an
opera by Alessandro Melani (1660-96) :—
Talor la granochiella nel pantano
Per allegrezza canta qua qua re,
Tribbia il grille tri tri tri,
L'Agnellino fa be be;
L'Usignuolo chiu chiu chiu,
Ed il gal curi cbi chi.
These imitations are said to have created much
delight among the audience. Coming now to
the great masters we find singularly few items for
our list. J. S. Bach has only one, the ' Capriccio
sopra la lontananza del suo fratello diletissimo,'
for pianoforte solo, in which occurs an imitation
of a posthorn. We cannot include the descriptive
choruses which abound in cantatas and oratorios,
the catalogue would be endless. We need only
mention casually the ' Schlacht bei Hochstadt ' of
Em. Bach, and dismiss Couperin with the remark
that though he frequently gives his harpsichord
pieces sentimental and flowery names, these
have no more application than the titles be
stowed so freely and universally on the ' drawing-
room' music of the present day. D. Scarlatti
wrote a well-known ' Cat's Fugue.' Handel has
not attempted to describe in music without the
aid of words — for the ' Harmonious Blacksmith '
is a mere after-invention, but he occasionally
follows not only the spirit but the letter of his
text with a faithfulness somewhat questionable,
as in the setting of such phrases as ' the hail
ran along upon the ground,' ' we have turned,'
and others, where the music literally executes
runs and turns. But this too literal following
of the words has been even perpetrated by
Bach ('Mein Jesu ziehe mich, so will ich
laufen'}, and by Beethoven (Mass in D, 'et
ascendit in ccelum ') ; and in the present day
the writer has heard more than one organist
at church gravely illustrating the words 'The
mountains skipped like rams ' in his accompani
ment, and on the slightest allusion to thunder
pressing down three or four of the lowest
pedals as a matter of course. Berlioz has ridi
culed the idea of interpreting the words ' high '
and 'low' literally in music, but the idea is
now too firmly rooted to be disturbed. Who
would seek to convey ethereal or heavenly ideas
other than by high notes or soprano voices, and
a notion of 'the great deep' or of gloomy subjects
other than by low notes and bass voices t
A number of Haydn's Symphonies are distin
guished by names, but none are sufficiently de
scriptive to be included here. Characteristic music
there is in plenty in the 'Seasons/ and 'Creation,'
but the only pieces of actual programme-music
—and those not striking specimens — are the
Earthquake movement, 'II Terremoto,' in the
'Seven Last Words/ and the 'Representation of
Chaos ' in the ' Creation/ by an exceedingly un-
chaotic fugue. Mozart adds nothing to our list,
though it should be remembered how greatly he
improved dramatic music. We now come to
the latter part of the i8th century, when pro
gramme pieces are in plenty. It is but natural
PROGRAMME-MUSIC.
PROQRAMME-MUSIC.
37
that the numerous battles of that stormy epoch
should have been commemorated by the arts,
and accordingly we find Battle Sonatas and Sym
phonies by the dozen. But first a passing mention
should be made of the three symphonies of
Ditters von Dittersdorf (1789) on subjects from
Ovid's Metamorphoses, viz. The four ages of the
world ; The fall of Phaeton ; and Action's Me
tamorphosis into a stag.
In an old volume of pianoforte music in the
British Museum Library (g. 138) may be seen
the following singular compositions : —
i. 'Britannia, an Allegorical Overture by D.
Steibelt, describing the victory over the Dutch
Fleet by Admiral Duncan.' In this, as well as all
other similar pieces, the composer has kindly sup
plied printed 'stage directions' throughout. Thus
— ' Adagio : the stillness of the night. The waves
of the sea. Advice from Captain Trollope'
(which is thus naively depicted) : —
- 1- m
<= n . . -~
f=> H
•
;*=; II
I •— '
SS—U -. -
- i- C
11
1 7-
33dtt
' Sailing of the Dutch Fleet announced (by a
march!). Beat to arms. Setting the sails, " Britons,
strike home." Sailing of the Fleet. Songs of the
sailors. Roaring of the sea. Joy on sight of
the enemy. Signal to engage. Approach to the
enemy. Cannons. Engagement. Discharge of
small arms. Falling of the mast (a descending
scale passage). Cries of the wounded :—
«
-•-n
£
Heat of the action. Cry of victory. " Rule
Britannia," (interrupted by) Distress of the Van-
quished. Sailing after victory. Return into port
and acclamation of the populace. " God save the
King." This composer has also written a well-
known descriptive rondo, ' The Storm,' as well
as other programme pieces, the titles of which will
be found under PIANOFORTE Music [vol.ii. 7256].
2. ' The Royal Embarkation at Greenwich, a
characteristic Sonata by Theodore Bridault.'
This piece professes to describe 'Grand Saluta
tion of Cannon and Music. The barge rowing off
to the Yatch. " Rule Britannia." His Majesty
going on board. Acclamations of the people'
(apparently not very enthusiastic).
3. 'The Battle of Egypt, by Dr. Domenico
Briscoli.' This is a piece of the same kind, with
full descriptions, and ending, as usual, with ' God
save the King.'
4. ' The Landing of the Brave 42nd in Egypt.
Military Rondo for Pianoforte, by T. H. Butler.'
The programme is thus stated : ' Braving all
opposition they land near Fort Aboukir, pursue
the French up the sand-hills, and in a bloody
battle conquer Buonaparte's best troops.'
5. Another 'Admiral Duncan's Victory,' by
J. Dale.
6. ' Nelson and the Navy, a Sonata in com
memoration of the glorious 1st of August, 1798,
by J. Dale.' A similar sea-piece, in which the
blowing up of L'Orient is represented by a grand
ascending scale passage.
7. A third 'Admiral Duncan,' by Dussek.
8. 'The Sufferings of the Queen of France,'
by Dussek. This is a series of very short move
ments strung together, each bearing a name.
A deep mourning line surrounds the title-page.
' The Queen's imprisonment (largo). She re
flects on her former greatness (maestoso). They
separate her from her children (agitato assai).
Farewell. They pronounce the sentence of death
(allegro con furia). Her resignation to her fate
(adagio innocente). The situation and reflections
the night before her execution (andante agitato).
The guards come to conduct her to the place of
execution. They enter the prison door. Funeral
March. The savage tumult of the rabble. The
Queen's invocation to the Almighty just before
her death (devotamente). The guillotine drops
(a ^ZissawcZo descending scale). The Apotheosis.'
9. 'A complete delineation of the Procession
.... in the Ceremony of Thanksgiving, 1797,'
by Dussek. The full title nearly fills a page.
Here we have horses prancing and guns firing,
and the whole concludes with Handel's Corona
tion Anthem.
10. ' A Description in Music of Anacreon's
L' Amour piqud par une abeille,' by J. Mugnie".
This is perhaps the first attempt to illustrate
a poem, and as such is commendable.
11. 'The Chace, or Royal Windsor Hunt,' by
H. B. Schroeder ; a descriptive hunting-piece.
12. 13. 'The Siege of Valenciennes,' and
' Nelson's Victory,' anonymous.
Far more famous, though not a whit superior
to any of these, was Kotzwara's ' Battle of
Prague.' It seems to be a mere accident that we
have not a piece of the same kind by Beethoven
on the Battle of Copenhagen ! x There is also a
' Conquest of Belgrade,' by Schroetter ; and a
composition by Bierey, in which one voice is ac
companied by four others imitating frogs — ' qua-
qua ! ' — belongs also to this period. Mr. Julian
i See his letters to Thomson, in Thayer, iii. 448, 9. He asked 50 gold
ducats for the job.
38
PROGRAMME-MUSIC.
Marshall possesses a number of compositions of
an obscure but original-minded composer of this
time (though perhaps a Prince), Signor Sampieri.
He appears to have been a pianoforte teacher
who sought to make his compositions interest
ing to his pupils by means of programmes, and
even by illustrations placed among the notes.
One of his pieces is ' A Grand Series of Musical
Compositions expressing Various Motions of the
Sea.' Here we have ' Promenade, Calm, Storm,
Distress of the Passengers, Vessel nearly lost,'
etc. Another is modestly entitled 'A Novel,
Sublime, and Celestial, Piece of Music called
NIGHT ; Divided into 5 Parts, viz. Evening,
Midnight, Aurora, Daylight, and The Rising of
the Sun.' On the cover is given ' A short Ac
count how this Piece is to be played. As it is
supposed the Day is more Chearful than the
Night, in consequence of which, the Evening,
begins by a piece of Serious Music. — Midnight,
by simple and innocent, at the same time shew
ing the Horror & Dead of the Night. Aurora,
by a Mild encreasing swelling or crescendo
Music, to shew the gradual approach of the Day.
Daylight, by a Gay & pleasing Movement, the
Rising of the Sun, concludes by an animating &
lively Rondo, & as the Sun advance into the
Centre of the Globe, the more the Music is
animating, and finishes the Piece.'
In this composition occur some imitations of
birds. That of the Thrush is not bad :
8m
L
m
The Blackbird and the Goldfinch are less happily
copied. Other works of this composer bear the
titles of 'The Elysian Fields,' 'The Progress of
Nature in various departments," ' New Grand
Pastorale and Rondo with imitation of the bag
pipes ' ; and there is a curiously illustrated piece
descriptive of a Country Fair, and all the
amusements therein.
Coming now to Beethoven, we have his own
authority for the fact, that when composing he
had always a picture in his mind, to which he
worked.1 But in two instances only has he de
scribed at all in detail what the picture was.
These two works, the Pastoral and the Battle
Symphonies, are of vastly different calibre. The
former, without in the slightest degree departing
from orthodox form, is a splendid precedent for
programme-music. In this, as in most works of
the higher kind of programme-music, the composer
seeks less to imitate the actual sounds of nature
than to evoke the same feelings as are caused by
the contemplation of a fair landscape, etc. And
with such consummate skill is this intention
wrought out that few people will be found to
agree with a writer in the ' Encyclopaedia
Britannica ' (former edition) who declares that if
this symphony were played to one ignorant of
the composer's intention the hearer would not
i In a conversation with Neate, in the fields near Baden (Thayer,
lii. 343). ' Ich habe immer ein Gemalde in meinen Gedanken, weun
ich am componiren bin, uad arbeite nach demselben.'
PROGRAMME-MUSIC.
be able to find out the programme for himself.
But even were this the case — as it undoubtedly
is with many other pieces — it would be no ar
gument against programme-music, which never
professes to propound conundrums. It may be
worth mentioning that the Pastoral Symphony
has actually been ' illustrated ' by scenes, ballet
and pantomime action in theatres. This was
done at a festival of the Kiinstler Liedertafel of
Diisseldorf in 1863 'by a series of living and
moving tableaux in which the situations de
scribed by the Tone-poem are scenically and
pantomimically illustrated.'2 A similar enter
tainment was given by Howard Glover in Lon
don the same and following year.
Another interesting fact concerning the Pas
toral Symphony is the identity of its pro
gramme with that of the 'Portrait Musical de
la Nature' of Knecht, described below. The
similarity however does not extend to the
music, in which there is not a trace of resem
blance. Mention has elsewhere been made of
an anticipation of the Storm music in the ' Pro
metheus ' ballet music, which is interesting to
note. Some description of the little-known
' Battle Symphony ' may not be out of place
here. It is in two parts ; the first begins
with ' English drums and trumpets ' followed by
' Rule Britannia,' then come ' French drums
and trumpets ' followed by ' Malbrook.' More
trumpets to give the signal for the assault on
either side, and the battle is represented by an
Allegro movement of an impetuous character.
Cannon of course are imitated— Storming March
— Presto — and the tumult increases. Then
Malbrook is played slowly and in a minor key,
clearly, if somewhat inadequately, depicting the
defeat of the French. This ends the ist part.
Part 2 is entitled ' Victory Symphony ' and
consists of an Allegro con brio followed by ' God
save the King' — a melody, it may be remarked,
which Beethoven greatly admired. The Allegro
is resumed, and then the anthem is worked up
in a spirited fugato to conclude.
Of the other works of Beethoven which are
considered as programme, or at least characteristic
music, a list has been already given at p. 206 & of
vol. i. It is sufficient here to remark that the
'Eroica' Symphony only strives to produce a
general impression of grandeur and heroism, and
the ' Pathetic ' and ' Farewell ' Sonatas do but
pourtray states of feeling, ideas which music is
peculiarly fitted to convey. The title 'Wuth
liber den verlorenen Groschen,' etc., given by
Beethoven to a Rondo (op. 1 29) is a mere joke.
Knecht's Symphony here demands a more de
tailed notice than has yet been given it. The
title-page runs as follows —
Le Portrait Musical de la Nature, ou Grande Simphonie . . . (For
ordinary orchestra minus clarinets.) Laquelle va exprimer par le
moyen des sons :
1. Une belle Contre'e ou le Soleil luit, les doux Zephirs voltigent,
les Kuisseaux traversent le vallon, les oiseaux gazouillent, un torrent
tombe du haut en murmurant, le berger siffle, les moutons sautent,
et la bergere fait entendre sa douce voix.
2. Le ciel commence £ devenir soudain et sombre, tout le voisin-
age a de la peine de respirer et s'effraye, les images noirs montent.
2 See ' Beethoven im Malkasten ' by Jahn, ' Gesam. AufsStze.'
PROGRAMME-MUSIC.
les vents se mettent a faire un bruit, le tonnerre gronde de loin et
1'orage approche a pas lents.
3. L'orage accompagne1 des vents murmurans et des pluies bat-
tans gronde avec toute la force, les sommets des arbres font un murm,
et le torrent roule ses eaux avec un bruit e'pouvantable.
4. L'orage s'appaise peu a peu les nuages se dissipent et le ciel
devient clair.
5. La Nature transported de la joie e"le"ve sa voix vers le ciel et
rend au cre"ateur les plus vives graces par des chants doux et agre'ables.
Dedie"e a Monsieur 1" Abbe" Vogler Premier Maitre de Chapelle Elec
torate de Palatin-Bavar, par Justin Henri Knecht.
[See KNECHT, vol. ii. p. 66.]
In spite of these elaborate promises the sym
phony, regarded as descriptive music, is a sadly
weak affair ; its sole merit lying in the oi'igin-
ality of its form. In the first movement (G
major, Allegretto) instead of the ' working out '
section there is an episode, Andante pastorale,
D major (a), formed from the first subject (6) by
metamorphosis, thus —
.»
PROGRAMME-MUSIC.
39
The Abb^ Vogler, to whom this composition is
dedicated, was himself a great writer of pro
gramme-music, having described in his Organ
Concertos such elaborate scenes as the drowning
of the Duke Leopold in a storm, the Last Judge
ment, with graves opening, appearance of the
mystic horsemen and choruses of damned and
blessed — and a naval battle in the fashion of
Dussek and the rest.
Coming now to modern times, we find a perfect
mania for giving names to pieces — showing the
bias of popular taste. Every concert overture
must have a title, whether it be programme-
music or not. Every ' drawing -room' piece, every
waltz or galop, must have its distinctive name,
till we cease to look for much descriptiveness in
any music. It cannot be said that all Mendels
sohn's overtures are programme-music. The
Midsummer Night's Dream, with its tripping
elves and braying donkey, certainly is, but the
' Meeresstille,' 'Hebrides,' and 'Melusine' are
only pieces which assume a definite colour or
character, the same as his 'Italian' and 'Scotch'
symphonies. To this perfectly legitimate extent
many modern pieces go ; and some term like
' tinted music ' should be invented for this large
class of compositions, which includes the greater
part of Schumann's pianoforte works, for instance.
The ' Carneval ' is decidedly programme-music,
so are most of the ' Kinderscenen ' and ' Wald-
scenen'; while others, despite their sometimes
extravagant titles, are purely abstract music : for
it is well known that Schumann often invented
the titles after the pieces were written. Such
pieces as the ' Fantasia in C ' and the longer
' Novelletten,' from their poetic cast and free
form give a decided impression of being intended
for descriptive music.
Spohr's Symphony ' Die Weihe der Tone ' (The
Consecration of Sound) bears some relation to the
Pastoral Symphony in its first movement ; the
imitations of Nature's sounds are perhaps some
what too realistic for a true work of art, but
have certainly conduced to its popularity. For
no faults are too grave to be forgiven when
a work has true beauty. His ' Seasons ' and
' Historical ' Symphonies are less characteristic.
Felicien David's wonderful ode-symphonie ' Le
Desert' must not be omitted, though it is almost
a cantata, like the ' Faust ' of Berlioz. Modern
dramatic music, in which descriptiveness is car
ried to an extent that the old masters never
dreamed of, forms a class to itself. This is not
the place to do more than glance at the wonder
ful achievements of Weber and Wagner.
Berlioz was one of the greatest champions of
programme -music ; he wrote nothing that was
not directly or indirectly connected with poetical
words or ideas ; but his love of the weird and
terrible has had a lamentable effect in repelling
public admiration for such works as the ' Francs
Juges ' and ' King Lear ' overtures. Music
which seeks to inspire awe and terror rather than
delight can never be popular. This remark
applies also to much of Liszt's music. The
novelty in construction of the ' Symphonische
Dichtungen ' would be freely forgiven were simple
beauty the result. But such subjects as ' Pro
metheus ' and 'The Battle of the Huns,' when
illustrated in a sternly realistic manner, are too
repulsive, the latter of these compositions having
indeed lately called forth the severe remark from
an eminent critic that ' These composers (Liszt
etc.) prowl about Golgotha for bones, and, when
found, they rattle them together and call the
noise music.' But no one can be insensible to
the charms of the preludes 'Tasso,' 'Dante,'
and ' Faust,' or of some unpretentious pianoforte
pieces, such as 'St. Fra^ois d'Assise predicant
aux oiseaux,' ' Au bord d'une source,' * Waldes-
rauschen,' and others.
Stern dale Bennett's charming 'Paradise and
the Peri ' overture is a good specimen of a work
whose intrinsic beauty pulls it through. An un
musical story, illustrated too literally by the
music, — yet the result is delightful. Raff, who
ought to know public taste as well as any man, has
named seven out of his nine symphonies, but they
are descriptive in a very unequal degree. The
'Lenore' follows the course of Burger's well-
known ballad, and the ' Im Walde ' depicts four
scenes of forest life. Others bear the titles of
'The Alps,' 'Spring,' 'Summer,' etc., but are
character-music only. Raff, unlike Liszt, re
mains faithful to classical form in his symphonies,
though this brings him into difficulties in the
Finale of the ' Forest ' symphony, where the
shades of evening have to fall and the ' Wild
Hunt ' to pass, twice over. The same difficulty
is felt in Bennett's Overture.
That the taste for 'music that means some
thing' is an increasing, and therefore a sound
one, no one can doubt who looks on the enormous
mass of modern music which comes under that
head. Letting alone the music which is only
intended for the uneducated, the extravagant
40
PEOGRAMME-MUSIC.
programme quadrilles of Jullien, and the clever,
if vulgar, imitative choruses of Offenbach and his
followers, it is certain that every piece of music
now derives additional interest from the mere
fact of having a distinctive title. Two excellent
specimens of the grotesque without vulgarity in
modern programme-music are Gounod's ' Funeral
March of a Marionette ' and Saint- Saens' ' Danse
Macabre.' In neither of these is the mark over
stepped. More dignified and poetic are the other
' Poemes Symphoniques ' of the latter composer,
the ' Rouet d'Omphale ' being a perfect gem in
its way. We may include Goldmark's 'Land-
liche Hochzeit ' symphony in our list, and if the
Characteristic Studies of Moscheles, Liszt, Henselt
and others are omitted, it is because they belong
rather to the other large class of character-pieces.
It will be noticed, on regarding this catalogue,
how much too extended is the application of the
term ' programme-music ' in the present day. If
every piece which has a distinct character is to
be accounted programme-music, then the 'Eroica'
Symphony goes side by side with Jullien's
'British Army Quadrille,' Berlioz's 'Episode de
la vie d'un Artiste ' with Dussek's ' Sufferings of
the Queen of France,' or Beethoven's 'Turkish
March ' with his ' Lebewohl ' sonata. It is ab
surd, therefore, to argue for or against programme-
music in general, when it contains as many and
diverse classes as does abstract music. As
before stated, theorising is useless — the result is
everything. A beautiful piece of music defies the
critics, and all the really beautiful pieces in the
present list survive, independently of the ques
tion whether programme-music is a legitimate
form of art or not. [F.C.]
PROGRESSION is motion from note to note,
or from chord to chord. The term is sometimes
used to define the general aspect of a more or less
extended group of such motions. It is also used
of a group of modulations, with reference to
the order of their succession. The expression
'progression of parts' is used with special re
ference to their relative motion in respect of one
another, and of the laws to which such relative
motion is subject. [See MOTION.] [C.H.H.P.]
PROLATION (Lat. Prolatio; Ital. Prola-
zione). A subdivision of the rhythmic system,
which, in Mediaeval Music, governed the pro
portionate duration of the Semibreve and the
Minim.
Prolation was of two kinds, the Greater, and
the Lesser — called by early English writers, the
More, and the Lesse, and by Italians, Prolazione
Perfetta, and Imperfetta. In the former — usually
indicated by a Circle, or Semicircle, with a Point
of Perfection in its centre — the Semibreve was
equal to three Minims. In the latter — distin
guished by the same signs, without the Point —
it was equal to two. [See POINT.] The signs,
however, varied greatly at different periods. In
the latter half of the i6th century, for instance,
the Circle was constantly either used in con
nection with, or replaced by, the figure 3, to which
circumstance we owe the presence of that figure
PROMENADE CONCERTS.
in our own Time-Signatures, the Time now
known as 3-2 being, in fact, the exact modern
equivalent of the Greater Prolation, and that
commonly called Alia Breve, (£, of the Lesser.
The Greater Prolation. The Lesser Prolation.
Prolation was generally intermixed with Mode,
and Time, in curiously intricate proportions,
which however were greatly simplified by the
best Masters of the best Period. [See MODE,
TIME, PROPORTION, NOTATION.] [W.S.R.]
PROMENADE CONCERTS. Although the
concerts given at Yauxhall, Ranelagh, Maryle-
bone, and other public gardens, might be placed
under this head, the class of entertainment now
so well known in this country under the name
was introduced into London from Paris. In
1838 some of the leading London instrumen
talists gave concerts at the English Opera House
(Lyceum) under the title of ' Promenade Concerts
a la Musard.' The pit was boarded over and an
orchestra erected upon the stage in the manner
now familiar to all, though then so strange.
The band consisted of 60 performers, including
many of the most eminent professors; Mr. J. T.
Willy was the leader, and Signer Negri the
conductor; the programmes were composed ex
clusively of instrumental music, each consist
ing of 4 overtures, 4 quadrilles (principally by
Musard), 4 waltzes (by Strauss and Lanner),
and a solo, usually for a wind instrument. The
first of the concerts was given on Dec. 12, and
they were continued, with great success, daring
the winter. Early in 1 839 the band of Valen
tino, the rival of Musard, came to London, and
gave concerts at the Crown and Anchor Tavern ;
the programmes being composed of music of a
higher class, the first part usually including a
symphony ; but they met with little support. In
Oct. 1839 the original speculators resumed opera
tions at the Lyceum. On June 8, 1840, 'Concerts
d'Ete"' were commenced at Drury Lane under
the conductorship of Eliason, the violinist, with
Jullien as his assistant, and a band of nearly
100, and a small chorus. Some dissensions
among the original managers led to concerts of
the same class being given by Mr. Willy in the
autumn and winter at the Princess's Theatre,
the majority of the band however still perform
ing at the Lyceum. About the same period
promenade concerts were given at Drury Lane,
and M usard was brought over to conduct them. In
Jan. 1841 'Concerts d'Hiver' were given in the
same house by Jullien, who soon firmly esta
blished himself in public favour ami continued
to give this class of concerts until 1859. [^ee
JULLIEN.] In 1851 promenade concerts conducted
by Balfe were given at Her Majesty's Theatre
under the title of 'National Concerts'; a large
band and chorus and some eminent principal
-singers were engaged, but the speculation proved
unsuccessful. Since Jullien's retirement, pro
menade concerts have been annually given in the
autumn at Covent Garden, with Alfred Mellon
PROMENADE CONCERTS.
as conductor until 1866, and afterwards under
various conductors, Signer Arditi, M. Hervd,
Mr. Arthur Sullivan, M. Riviere, etc. [W.H.H.]
PROMETHEUS. Beethoven's only Ballet
(op. 43) ; designed by Salvatore Vigano ; com
posed in 1800, and produced, for Mile. Casentini's
benefit, March 28, 1801, in the Burg- theater,
Vienna, under the title of ' Die Geschb'pfe des
Prometheus.' It contains an overture, an 'Intro
duction,' and 1 6 numbers. The title of the first
edition, an arrangement for the piano (Vienna,
1801, numbered in error op. 24), is ' Gli Uomini
di Prometeo'; English edition, 'The men of
Prometheus.' If Beyle — who under the name
of Bombet wrote the famous letters on Haydn —
may be trusted, the representation of Chaos from
the ' Creation ' was interpolated by Vigano into
Beethoven's Ballet at Milan, to express 'the first
dawn of sentiment in the mind of beauty ' (what
ever that may mean).1
No. 5 is a very early instance of the use of
the Harp with the Orchestra. — The Introduction
contains a partial anticipation of the Storm in
the Pastoral Symphony. — The Finale contains
two tunes which Beethoven has used elsewhere;
the first of these, in Eb, appears as a Contre-
tanz, No. 7 of 12 ; as the theme of 15 variations
and a fugue for the PF. in Eb (op. 35, composed
in 1802); and as the principal theme in the
Finale to the Eroica Symphony. The second —
in G — appears as a Contretanz, No. n of the
set first mentioned. Such repetitions are rare in
Beethoven. — The autograph of Prometheus has
disappeared, but the Hofbibliothek at Vienna
possesses a transcript with Beethoven's cor
rections. [G.]
PROPHETS, LE. Opera in 5 acts ; words by
Scribe, music by Meyerbeer. Produced at the
Opera, Paris, April 16, 1849. IQ Italian, in
4 acts, at Covent Garden, July 24, 1849. [G-]
PROPORTION (Lat. Proportio; Ital. Pro-
porzione). A term used in Arithmetic to express
certain harmonious relations existing between the
several elements of a series of numbers; and trans
ferred from the terminology of Mathematics to
that of Music, in which it plays a very prominent
part. In Music, however, the word is not always
employed in its strict mathematical sense : for,
a true Proportion can only exist in the presence
of three terms ; in which point it differs from the
Ratio, which is naturally expressed by two. Now,
the so-called 'Proportions' of Musical Science are
almost always expressible by two terms only, and
should therefore be more correctly called Ratios ;
but we shall find it convenient to assume, that,
in musical phraseology, the two words may be
lawfully treated as synonymous — as, in fact, they
actually have been treated, by almost all who have
written on the subject, from Joannes Tinctor, who
published the first Musical Dictionary, in the
year 1474,2 to the Theorists of the i8th and ipth
centuries.
Of the three principal kinds of Proportion
1 Lettres sur Haydn, No. 18 ; May 31, 1809.
a ' PROPORTIO est duorum numerorum habitudo ' (Joannis Tinctoris ,
'Terminorum Musicas Diffinitorium.' Lit. P.)
PROPORTION.
41
known to Mathematicians, two only — the Arith
metical and Geometrical species — are extensively
used in Music : the former in connection with
differences of Pitch and Rhythm ; the latter, in
the construction of the Time-table, the Scale of
Organ Pipes, and other matters of importance.
Thomas Morley, in his 'Plaine and easie In
troduction to Practicall Musicke' (London 1597),
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
2
4
6
8
IO
12
14
16
18
20
3
6
9
12
IS
18
21
24
27
3°
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32
36
40
5
10
'S
20
25
3°
35
40
45
So
6
12
18
24
3°
36
42
48
54
60
1
14
21
28
35
42
49
56
63
70
8
16
24
32
40
48
56
64
72
80
9
18
21
36
45
54
63
72
81
90
10
20
30
4°
5°
60
70
80
90
IOO
gives a Table, which exhibits, at one view, all the
different kinds of Proportion then in general use ;
thereby saving so much time and trouble, in the
way of reference, that we have thought it well to
42
PROPORTION.
reproduce his Diagram, before proceeding to the
practical application of our subject.
To use this Table, (i) When the name of the
Proportion is known, but not its constituents,
find the name in the upper part of the Diagram ;
follow down the lines of the lozenge in which it
is enclosed, as far as the first horizontal line of
figures ; and the two required numbers will be
found under the points to which these diagonal
lines lead. Thus, Tripla Sesquialtera lies near
the left-hand side of the Diagram, about mid
way between the top and bottom ; and the
diagonal lines leading down from it conduct us
to the numbers 2 and 7, which express the re
quired Proportion in its lowest terms. (2) When
the constituents of the Proportion are known,
but not its name, find the two known numbers
in the same horizontal line; follow the lines
which enclose them, upwards, into the diagonal
portion of the Diagram ; and, at the apex of the
triangle thus formed will be found the required
name. Thus the lines leading from 2 and 8 con
duct us to Quadrupla.
The uppermost of the horizontal lines comprises
all the Proportions possible, between the series of
numbers from I to 10 inclusive, reduced to their
lowest terms. The subsequent lines give their
multiples, as far as 100 ; and, as these multiples
always bear the same names as their lowest re
presentatives, the lines drawn from them lead
always to the apex of the same triangle.
By means of the Proportions here indicated,
the Theorist is enabled to define the difference of
pitch between two given sounds with mathema
tical exactness. Thus, the Octave, sounded by
the half of an Open String, is represented by the
Proportion called Dupla ; the Perfect Fifth,
sounded by 2-3 of the String, by that called
Sesquialtera ; the Perfect Fourth, sounded by
3-4, by Sesquitertia. These Ratios are simple
enough, and scarcely need a diagram for their
elucidation ; but, as we proceed to more complex
Intervals, and especially to those of a dissonant
character, the Proportions grow far more intri
cate, and Morley 's Table becomes really valuable.
A certain number of these Proportions are also
used for the purpose of defining differences of
Rhythm; and, in Mediaeval Music, the latter class
of differences involves even greater complications
than the former.
The nature of MODE, TIME, and PROLATION
will be found fully explained under their own
special headings ; and the reader who has care
fully studied these antient rhythmic systems will
be quite prepared to appreciate the confusion
which could scarcely fail to arise from their un
restrained commixture. [See NOTATION.] Time
was, when this commixture was looked upon as
the cachet of a refined and classical style. The
early Flemish Composers delighted in it. Jos-
quin constantly made one Voice sing in one
kind of Rhythm, while another sang in another.
Hobrecht, in his ' Missa Je ne demande,' uses
no less than five different Time-signatures at the
beginning of a single Stave — an expedient which
became quite characteristic of the Music of the
PROPORTION.
1 5th and earlier years of the i6th centuries. It
was chiefly for the sake of elucidating the mys
teries of this style of writing that Morley gave
his Table to the world ; and, by way of making
the matter clearer, he followed it up by a setting
of 'Christes Crosse be my speed,' for Three Voices,
containing examples of Dupla, Tripla, Quadrupla,
Sesquialtera, Sesquiquarta, Quadrupla-Sesqui-
quarta, Quintupla, Sextupla, Septupla, Nonupla,
Decupla, and Super tripartiens quartas, giving it
to his pupil, Philomathes, with the encouraging
direction — 'Take this Song, peruse it, and sing it
perfectly ; and I doubt not but you may sing any
reasonable hard wrote Song that may come to
your sight.'
Nevertheless, Morley himself confesses that
these curious combinations had fallen quite into
disuse long before the close of the i6th century.
Ornithoparcus, writing in I5I7,1 mentions
eight combinations of Proportion only, all of
which have their analogues in modern Music,
though, the Large and Long being no longer in
use, they cannot all be conveniently expressed in
modern Notation, (i) The Greater Mode Per
fect, with Perfect Time; (2) the Greater Mode
Imperfect, with Perfect Time ; (3) the Lesser
Mode Perfect, with Imperfect Time; (4) the
Lesser Mode Imperfect, with Imperfect Time;
(5) the Greater Prolation, with Perfect Time;
(6) the Greater Prolation, with Imperfect Time ;
(7) Perfect Time, with the Lesser Prolation ;
(8) Imperfect Time, with the Lesser Prolation.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. 8.
Adam de Fulda, Sebald Hey den, and Hermann
Finck, use a different form of Signature ; distin
guishing the Perfect, or Imperfect Modes, by a
large Circle, or Semicircle ; Perfect, or Imperfect
Time, by a smaller one, enclosed within it ; and
the Greater, or Lesser Prolation, by the presence,
or absence, of a Point of Perfection in the centre
of the whole ; thus —
In his First Book of Masses, published in 1554,
Palestrina has employed Perfect and Imperfect
Time, and the Greater and Lesser Prolation,
simultaneously, in highly complex Proportions,
more especially in the ' Missa Virtute magna,'
the second Osanna of which presents difficulties
with which few modern Choirs could cope ; while,
in his learned * Missa L'homme arme,' he has
produced a rhythmic labyrinth which even Jos-
quin might have envied. But, after the pro
duction of the ' Missa Papae Marcelli,' in the year
1565, he confined himself almost exclusively to
the use of Imperfect Time, with the Lesser Pro
lation, equivalent to our Alia Breve, with four
Minims in the Measure ; the Lesser Prolation,
alone, answering to our Common Time, with four
Crotchets in the Measure; Perfect Time, with
the Lesser Prolation, containing three Semibreves
i Micrologus, lib. li. cap. 5.
PKOPORTION.
in the Measure ; and the Greater Prolation, alone
represented by our 3-2. A very little considera
tion will suffice to shew that all these combina
tions are reducible to simple Dupla, and Tripla.
Our modern Proportions are equally unpreten
tious, and far more clearly expressed ; all Simple
Times being either Duple, or Triple, with Duple
subdivisions; and Compound Times, Duple, or
Triple, with Triple subdivisions. Modern Com
posers sometimes intermix these different species
of Rhythm, just as the Greater and Lesser Pro
lation were intermixed, in the Middle Ages ; but,
the simplicity of our Time-signatures deprives the
process of almost all its complication. No one,
for instance, finds any difficulty in reading the
Third and Fourth Doubles in the last Movement
of Handel's Fifth Suite (the ' Harmonious Black
smith'), though one hand plays in Common Time,
and the other in 24-16. Equally clear in its
intention, and intelligible in the appearance it
presents to the eye, is the celebrated Scene in
' Don Giovanni,' in which the First Orchestra
plays a Minuet, in 3-4 ; the Second, a Gavotte,
in 2-4 ; and the Third, a Yalse, in 3-8 ; all
blending together in one harmonious whole — a
triumph of ingenious Proportion worthy of a
Netherlander of the I5th century, which could
only have been conceived by a Musician as re
markable for the depth of his learning as for the
geniality of his style. Spohr has used the same
expedient, with striking effect, in the Slow Move
ment of his Symphony ' Die Weihe der Tone ' ;
and other still later Composers have adopted it,
with very fair success, and with a very moderate
degree of difficulty — for our Rhythmic Signs are
too clear to admit the possibility of misappre
hension. Our Time-table, too, is simplicity itself,
though in strict Geometrical Proportion — the
Breve being twice as long as the Scmibreve, the
Semibreve twice as long as the Minim, and so
with the rest. We have, in fact, done all in our
power to render the rudiments of the Art intelli
gible to the meanest capacity : and only in a very
few cases — such as those which concern the ' Sec
tion of the Canon,' as demonstrated by Euclid,
and other writers on the origin and constitution
of the Scale ; the regulation of Temperament ;
the Scale of Organ Pipes ; and others of like nature
—are we concerned with Proportions sufficiently
intricate to demand the aid of the Mathematician
for their elucidation. [W.S.R.]
PROPOSTA (Lat. Dux; Eng. Subject). A
term applied to the Leading Part, in a Fugue,
or Point of Imitation, in contradistinction to the
Risposta, or Response (Eng. Answer ; Lat.
Comes). The Leading Part of a Canon is usually
called the Guida, though the term Proposta
is sometimes applied to that also. [W.S.R.]
PROPRIETAS, propriety (Germ. Eigenheit).
A peculiarity attributed, by Mediaeval writers,
to those Ligatures in which the first note
was sung as a Breve : the Breve being always
understood to represent a complete Measure
(Lat. Tactus-, Old Eng. Stroke). Franco of
Cologne describes Ligatures beginning with
PRUDENT.
43
Breves, Longs, and Semibreves, as Ligaturrv
cum, sine, and cum opposita Proprietate, respec
tively. [W.S.R.]
PROSE. [See SEQUENTIA.]
PROSKE, KARL, editor of the celebrated
collection of ancient church-music called MUSICA
DIVINA, born Feb. 1 1, i 794, at Grb'bing in Upper
Silesia, where his father was a wealthy land
owner. Having studied medicine he made the
campaign of 1813-15 as an army surgeon, but
being compelled to retire by his health, he took
his degree as Doctor of Medicine at Halle, and
settled as government physician at Oppeln in
Upper Silesia. Here he suddenly became a reli
gious enthusiast, a change to which his devotion
to church music doubtless contributed. On
April n, 1826, he was ordained priest by Bishop
Sailer at Ratisbon, where he became vicar-choral
in 1827, and Canon and Capellmeister of the
Cathedral in 1830. From this time, with the
aid of his private fortune, he began his cele
brated collection of church music, residing for
long in Italy exploring the great MS. collections
there, and scoring from the voice-parts many
very beautiful, but hitherto unknown works, and
publishing them in a cheap, accurate, and legible
form as ' Musica Divina' [see vol. ii. p. 411].
Each volume is preceded by introductory remarks,
biographical and bibliographical. Attention has
been repeatedly called in this Dictionary to the
merits of this collection. [See among others
MASS; IMPROPERIA."] Proske died of angina
pectoris, Dec. 20, 1861, bequeathing his collec
tion to the episcopal library of Ratisbon, of which
it forms one of the chief ornaments. [F.G.]
PROUT, EBENEZER, B.A., born % at Oundle,
Northamptonshire, March I, 1835, graduated
at London, 1854. He studied the pianoforte
under Charles Salaman. In 1862 he gained the
first prize of the Society of British Musicians for
the best string quartet, and in 1865 their first
prize for pianoforte quartet. From 1871 to 1874
he was editor of "The Monthly Musical Record,'
and since then has been successively music
critic of ' The Academy ' and ' The Athenaeum.'
He is conductor of the Borough of Hackney
Choral Association, and Professor of harmony
and composition at the Royal Academy of
Music and the National Training School of
Music. His compositions include String Quartet
in Eb, op. i ; PF. Quartet in C. op. 2 ; PF. Quin
tet in G, op. 3 ; Concert for Organ and Orchestra,
op. 5 ; Magnificat in C, op. 7 ; and Evening
Service in Eb, op. 8, both with orchestra ; ' Here-
ward,' dramatic cantata, op. 12 (produced at
St. James's Hall, June 4, 1879); and two MS.
symphonies in C major and G minor. [W. H.H.]
PRUDENT, EMILE, born at AngoulSme, April
3, 1817, never knew his parents, but was adopted
by a piano-tuner, who taught him a little music.
He entered the Paris Conservatoire at 10, and
obtained the first piano prize in 1833, and the
second harmony prize in 1 834. He had no patrons
to push him, and his want of education not being
supplied by natural facility, he had a long struggle
44
PKUDENT.
with the stern realities of life, but by dint of pa
tience and perseverance he overcame all obstacles.
His first performance in public was at a concert
with Thai berg, whose style he imitated, and the
success of his fantasia on 'Lucia di Lammermoor'
(op. 8) established him with the public. He then
made constant excursions in France, and occa
sional trips abroad, but his home continued to be
in Paris, and there he composed and produced his
new pieces. His compositions, about 70 in num
ber, include a trio for PF., violin, and cello ; a
concerto- symphonic 'Les trois Reves' (op. 67);
several brilliant and pleasing morceaux de genre,
such as 'Les Bois,' and 'La Danse des Fees' ; fan
tasias on opera-airs, or themes by classical com
posers ; transcriptions with and without varia
tions, cleverly calculated to display the virtuosity
of a pianist ; and finally ' Etudes de genre,' also
intended to show off manual dexterity. His
music is clear, melodious, and correct ; pleasing
the ear without straining the attention. Prudent
is no fiery or original genius, but an artist with a
real love for his instrument, and a thorough
understanding of its resources, and a musician of
taste and progress. From Thalberg to Mendels
sohn is a long way to traverse, and Prudent
was studying the latter composer with enthusiasm
when he was carried off after 48 hours' illness,
by diphtheria, on May 14, 1863. His kind and
generous disposition caused him to be universally
. regretted. He was a good teacher, and formed
several distinguished pupils, especially ladies ;
among these Mile. Louise Murer, who took the
first piano prize at the Conservatoire in 1854, was
the best interpreter of his works. In England
he was well known. He played a concerto in
Bb of his own composition at the Philharmonic,
May I, 1848; returned in 1852 and introduced
his elegant morceau 'La Chasse,' which he re
peated at the New Philharmonic Concert June i,
1853- [G.C.]
PEUME, FRANCOIS HUBERT, violinist, was
born in 1816 at Stavelot near Liege. Having
received his first instruction at Malme'dy, he
entered in 1827 the newly opened Conservatoire
at Liege, and in 1830 that at Paris, where he
studied for two years under Habeneck. Re
turning to Liege he was appointed professor at
the Conservatoire, although only seventeen years
of age. In 1839 ne began to travel, and visited
with much success Germany, Russia, and the
Scandinavian countries. He died in 1849 at
Stavelot. Prume was an elegant virtuoso, with
most of the characteristic qualities of the modern
Franco-Belgian school. He is chiefly remem
bered as the composer of ' La Melancholie ' a
sentimental piece de salon which for- a time
attained an extraordinary popularity, without
however possessing the artistic worth of the rest
of Prume's compositions. [P. D.]
PRUMIER, ANTOINE, born in Paris July 2,
1794, learned the harp from his mother, and
afterwards entered the Conservatoire, and ob
tained the second harmony prize in Catel's class
in 1812. After this however he was compelled
PSALTERY.
by military law to enter the Ecole poly technique ;
but in 1815 he gave up mathematics, re-entered
the Conservatoire, and finished his studies in
counterpoint under Eler. He then became harpist
in the orchestra of the Italiens, and, on the death
of Nadermann in 1835, professor of the harp at
the Conservatoire. In the same year he migrated
to the Ope"ra Comique, but resigned his post in
1840 in favour of his son, the best of his pupils.
Prumier composed and published about a hundred
fantasias, rondeau x, and airs with variations for
the harp — all well written but now antiquated.
He received the Legion of Honour in 1845, and
was vice-president of the Association des Artistes
Musiciens for 17 years consecutively. He died
from the rupture of an aneurism at a committee
meeting of the Conservatoire, Jan. 21, 1868.
He had retired on his pension the year before,
and been succeeded by Labarre, at whose death
(April 1870) the professorship devolved upon
CONRAD PRUMIER, born in Paris, Jan. 5, 1820,
and laurdat in 1838. Like his father he writes
well for the instrument, and is considered a
skilled performer and a musician of taste. [G.C.]
PSALTERY (faXTfjpiov; Old English Sautry;
French Psalterion ; Ital. Salterio ; Ger. Psalter).
A dulcimer, played with the fingers or a
plectrum instead of by hammers. The French
have adopted the Greek name without change.
There exists a classic sculptured representation
of the Muse Erato, holding a long ten-stringed
lyre, with the name ¥AATPIAN cut on its base.
From this it has been inferred that the strings of
this lyre were touched by the fingers without
the usual plectrum of ivory or metal. Chaucer's
' sautrie ' in the Miller's Tale 1 came direct from
the East, perhaps imported by returning Cru
saders, its kinship to the Persian and Arabic
santir and kanun being unmistakable. The
psaltery was the prototype of the spinet and
harpsichord, particularly in the form which is
described by Praetorius in his ' Organographia,'
as the ' Istromento di porco,' so called from its
Hkeness to a pig's head.
The illustration is drawn from a 15th-century
painting by Filipino Lippi in the National Gal
lery, and represents a^stromento di porco' strung
vertically, a mode less usual than the hori
zontal stringing, but more like that of a harp
sichord or grand piano. Notwithstanding the
general use of keyed instruments in 1650 we
read in the * Musurgia ' of Athanasius Kircher,
that the psaltery played with a skilled hand
stood second to no other instrument, and Mer-
senne, about the same date, praises its silvery
tone in preference to that of any other, and its
purity of intonation, so easily controlled by the
fingers.
No ' Istromento di porco' being now known to
exist, we have to look for its likeness in painted
or sculptured representations. The earliest occurs
in a 13th-century MS. in the library at Douai.
It is there played without a plectrum. From
1 'And all above ther lay a gay sautrie
On which he made on nightes melodic,
' So swetely, that all the chambre rong,
And Angelus ad viryi'nem he song.'
PSALTERY.
the 1 4th century there remain frequent examples,
notably at Florence, in the famous Organ Podium
of Luca della Robbia, a cast of which is in the
South Kensington Museum.
PUGNANI.
45
But other forms were admired. Exactly like
an Arabic Jcanun is a psaltery painted A.D. 1348
by that loving delineator of musical instruments,
Orcagna, himself a musician, in his ' Trionfo della
Morte,' at Pisa. The strings of the instrument
are in groups of three, each group, as in a grand
piano, being tuned in unison to make one note.
Sometimes there were groups of four, a not
unfrequent stringing in the DULCIMER. There is
a good coloured lithograph of Orcagna's fresco in
' Les Arts au Moyen Age/ by Paul Lacroix (Paris,
1874, p. 282); it is there called ' Le songe de
la Vie.' A fine representation of such a psaltery,
strung in threes, by Orcagna, will be found in our
National Gallery (Catalogue No. 569). [A.J.H.]
PUCITTA, VINCENZO, was born at Rome,
1778, and brought up at the Pieta, at Naples,
under Fenaroli and Sala. He wrote his first
opera for Sinigaglia, near Ancona, and from that
time till his death composed for the stage dili
gently. 'I due Prigionieri' (Rome 1801) was
the first to make him widely known. He was,
however, often away from Italy, first at Lisbon,
where he brought out ' L'Andromacca,' and then
in London, where he became for a time Director
of the Music at the Opera.
His name first appears in 1809, when three of
his operas were performed — ' I Villeggiaturi bi-
zarri,' 'La Caccia d'Enrico IV,' and 'Le quattro
Nazioni.' In 1810 we find his ' La Vestale,' in
1811 'La tre Sultane,' in 1812 ' La Ginevra di
Scozia,' in 1813 'Boadicea,' and in 1814 'Aristo-
demo.' He then left the Opera and travelled with
Madame Catalani ; and when, in 1 8 1 3, she took the
direction of the Italian Opera at Paris, he became
accompanyist, and three of his works were brought
out there in 1815, 16 and 17. He then went to
Rome, and remained in Italy 'till his death, at
Milan, Dec. 20, 1861. Fe'tis gives a list of 23 of
his operas, and says that his music shows great
facility but no invention. Ten volumes of his
songs, entitled ' Mille Melodie,' are published by
Ricordi. [G.]
PUGET, LoiSA, born at Paris about 1810;
though an amateur, achieved an extraordinary
popularity in the reign of Louis Philippe by her
songs, composed to Gustave Lemoine's words.
Among the best known of these were, ' A la
gr§,ce de Dieu,' ' Ave Maria,' ' Le Soleil de ma
Bretagne,' ' Ta dot,' ' Mon pays,' 'Les reves
d'une jeune fille,' etc. Musically speaking they
are inferior to those of Panseron, Labarre, or Ma-
sini ; but the melodies were always so natural
and so suited to the words, and the words them
selves were so full of that good, bourgeois cha
racter, which at that time was all the fashion in
France, that their vogue was immense. En
couraged by her success, Puget aspired to the
theatre. She took lessons from Adolphe Adam,
and on Oct. i, 1836, produced at the Opera
Comique a one-act piece, 'Le mauvais (Eil,'
which was sung to perfection by Ponchard and
Mme. Damoreau. In 1842 she married Le-
moine, and finding the popularity of her songs
on the wane, had the tact to publish no more.
She broke silence only once again with an oper
etta called ' La Veilleuse, ou les Nuits de Mi
lady,' produced at the Gymnase,. Sept. 27, 1869.
Madame Lemoine has for some time resided at
Pau, where she is still living (1881). [G.C.]
PUGNANI, GAETANO, celebrated violinist,
was born at Turin (or according to another
source at Canavese) in 1727. He must be con
sidered as one of the best representatives of the
Piedmontese School of violin-playing. Being a
pupil first of Somis, who studied under Corelli,
and afterwards of Tartini, he combined the pro
minent qualities of the style and technique of
both these great masters. He was appointed
first violin to the Sardinian court in 1752, and
began to travel in 1754. He made lengthened
stays at Paris and in London, where he was
for a time leader of the opera band, produced an
opera of his own (Burney, Hist. iv. 494), and
published trios, quartets, quintets, and sympho
nies. In 1770 Burney found him at Turin, and
there he remained as leader, conductor, teacher
and composer,, for the rest of his life. He died
in 1803.
To Pugnani more than to any other master
of the violin appears to be due the preservation
of the pure gjand style of Corelli, Tartini and
Vivaldi, and its transmission to the next genera
tion of violinists. Apart from being himself
an excellent player he trained a large number
of eminent violinists— such as Conforti, Bruni,
Polledro and, above all, Viotti. He was also a
prolific composer : he wrote a number of operas
and ballets, which however appear not to have
been very successful. Fe'tis gives the names of
9, and a list of his published instrumental compo
sitions : — one violin-concerto (out of 9), 3 sets of
violin-sonatas, duos, trios, quartets, quintets, and
12 symphonies for strings, oboes and horns. [P.D.]
46
PUPPO.
PUPPO, GIUSEPPE, eminent violinist, was
born at Lucca in 1749. He was a pupil of the
Conservatorio at Naples, and when still very
young gained considerable reputation in Italy as
a virtuoso. He came to Paris in 1775; thence
he went to Spain and Portugal, where he is
reported to have amassed a fortune. After
having stayed for some years in England he
returned to Paris in 1 784, and remained there
till 1811, occupying the post of leader, first at
the Theatre de Monsieur, which was then
under Viotti's direction, then at the Theatre
Feydeau, and finally conducting the band at the
Theatre Fran9ais. As he was an excellent ac-
companyist, he was much in request in the
musical circles of the rich and noble, and might
have secured for himself a competency if it had
not been for his eccentricity and unsteadiness,
which brought him into constant troubles. In
1811 he suddenly left Paris, abandoning his wife
and children for ever. Arrived at Naples he
was lucky enough to secure the leadership of the
band at a theatre. He however did not stay
long, but went to Lucca, thence to Florence,
and finally found employment as teacher at a
music school at Ponfcremoli. After two years
he threw up this appointment and returned
to Florence, was there found, utterly destitute,
by Mr. Edward Taylor, Gresham Professor of
Music, and by his generosity was placed in a
hospice, where he died in 1827. Fe"tis gives
interesting details of his adventurous life, and
several of his bon mots. It was he who so
happily described Boccherini as ' the wife of
Haydn.' His published compositions are few
and of no importance. [P. D.]
PURCELL. The name of a family of musi
cians in the I7th and i8th centuries, which
included amongst its members the greatest and
most original of English composers.
1. The name of ' Pursell,' presumably HENRY
PURCELL the elder, is first found in Pepys's diary,
under date Feb. 21, 1660, where he is styled
4 Master of Musique.' Upon the re-establishment
of the Chapel Royal (in 1660) Henry Purcell was
appointed one of the Gentlemen. He was also
Master of the Choristers of Westminster Abbey.
On Dec. 21, 1663, he succeeded Signor Angelo
as one of the King's Band of Music. He died
Aug. n, 1664. and was buried in the east cloister
of Westminster Abbey, Aug. 13. There is a three-
part song, 'Sweet tyranness, I now resign my
heart,' inPlayford's 'Musical Companion,' 1667,
which is probably of his composition, although it
is sometimes attributed to his more celebrated son.
It was reprinted in Burney's History, iii. 486.
2. His eldest son, EDWARD, born 1653, was
Gentleman Usher to Charles II, and afterwards
entered the army and served with Sir George
Rooke at the taking of Gibraltar, and the Prince
of Hesse at the defence of it. Upon the death of
Queen Anne he retired and resided in the house
of the Earl of Abingdon, where he died June 20,
1717. He was buried in the chancel of the church
of Wytham, near Oxford.
3. HENRY PURCELL, the second eon of Henry
PURCELL.
Purcell the elder, is traditionally said to have
been born in Old Pye Street, Westminster, in or
about 1658. He lost his father before he was
six years old,1 and soon afterwards was admitted
a chorister of the Chapel Royal under Capt.
Henry Cooke, after whose death, in 1672, he
continued under Pelham Humfrey. He is said
to have composed anthems whilst yet a chorister,
but there are now no means of verifying the
fact, although it is highly probable. He may
possibly have remained in the choir for a brief
period after the appointment of Blow as successor
to Humfrey as Master of the Children, but the
probability is that, after quitting the choir on
the breaking of his voice, he studied composition
under Blow as a private pupil, and so justified
the statement on Blow's monument that he was
' master to the famous Mr. H. Purcell.' In
1675, when only 17 years of age, Purcell was
engaged by Josias Priest, a dancing-master
connected with the theatres, who also kept a
' boarding school for young gentlewomen' in
Leicester Fields, to compose an opera written by
Nahum Tate, called ' Dido and JEneas,' for per
formance at his school. Purcell executed his
task in a manner which would have added to the
reputation of many an older musician. The opera
is without spoken dialogue, the place of which
is supplied by recitative ; it contains some beau
tiful airs, and some spirited choruses, especially
that beginning 'To the hills and the vales.'
The work, although not performed on the public
stage, acquired considerable popularity, as is
evident from the number of manuscript copies
in existence; but, with the exception of one
song, printed in the ' Orpheus Britannicus,' and
the rondo 'Fear no danger,' printed by Warren
and others, it remained unpublished until 1840,
when it was printed by the ' Musical Antiquarian
Society.'2 The production of ' Dido and ^Eneas'
led to Purcell's introduction to the public
theatre. In 1676 he was engaged to write
music for Dry den's tragedy ' Aurenge-Zebe,' and
for Shadwell's comedy ' Epsom Wells,' and part
of the music for his tragedy ' The Libertine.1
The latter contains the pleasing air 'Nymphs
and Shepherds,' and the well-known chorus ' In
these delightful pleasant groves.' In the same
year a song by him appeared in the new edition
of Book I. of Playford's publication, ' Choice
Ayres, Songs and Dialogues/ In 1677 ne ^ur"
nished an overture, eight act and other tunes,
and songs for Mrs. Behn's tragedy 'Abdelazor,'
and composed an elegy on the death of Matthew
Lock, printed in Book II. of the ' Choice Ayres,'
etc., 1679. In 1678 he composed the overture and
instrumental music and the masque in ShadwelTs
alteration of Shakspere's 'Timon of Athens,'
representing the contest between Cupid and
Bacchus for supremacy over mankind, and their
1 His mother, Elisabeth, survived to -witness the -whole of her son's
career, and died in August 1699.
2 Priest removed his school in 1680 to Chelsea, -where 'Dido and
.ffCneas ' -was again performed, as appears from an undated printed
sopy of the words published in London. This copy contains a pro-
ogue for music -which Purcell does not appear to have set. The
>iece was revived at the R.A.AI. Concert-room, London, Julj 10, 1878,
>y Mr. Malcolm Lawsun.
PURCELL.
ultimate agreement to exercise a joint influence;
a very beautiful and characteristic composition.
He does not appear to have produced anything
for the theatre in 1679, but several of his songs
were published in that year in Playford's second
Book just named; and an extant letter, dated
Feb. 8, 1678-9, from his uncle Thomas, to the
Rev. John Gostling, the celebrated bass singer,
then at Canterbury, shows that he then produced
something for the church ; the writer telling
Gostling that his son, Henry (as he affectionately
called his nephew), was then composing and that
the composition was likely to cause Gostling to
be called to London. Gostling was appointed a
gentleman extraordinary of the Chapel Royal Feb.
25, 1679, and a gentleman in ordinary soon after
wards. It would be very interesting to know
which of Purcell's anthems was then produced, but
at present there seems no clue. In 1680, however,
he composed music for Lee's tragedy ' Theodosius,'
and the overture and act tunes for D'Urfey's
comedy 'The Virtuous Wife,' and produced the first
of his numerous odes, viz. ' An Ode or Welcome
Song for his Royal Highness [the Duke of York]
on his return from Scotland,' and 'A Song to
welcome home His Majesty from Windsor.' In
the same year he obtained the appointment of
organist of Westminster Abbey, and then gave
up his connection with the theatre, which he
did not renew for six years. In this interval
it may be assumed that much of his church
music was composed. In 1681 he composed
another Ode or Welcome Song for the King,
'Swifter, Isis, swifter flow.' On July 14, 1682,
he was appointed organist of the Chapel Royal
in the place of Edward Lowe, deceased, but was
not sworn in until Sept. 16 following. He com
posed an Ode or Welcome Song to the King on
his return from Newmarket, Oct. 21, — 'The
summer's absence unconcerned we bear,' — and
some songs for the inauguration of the Lord
Mayor, Sir William Pritchard, Oct. 29. In 1683
Purcell came forward in a new capacity, viz. as
a. composer of instrumental chamber music, by
the publication of ' Sonnatas of III parts, two
Viollins and Basse to the Organ or Harpsichord,'
with an engraved portrait of himself, at the age
of 24, prefixed. These sonatas are 1 2 in number,
and each comprises an adagio, a canzone (fugue),
a slow movement, and an air ; they are avowedly
formed upon Italian models, as the composer in
his preface says, ' For its author he has faithfully
endeavoured a just imitation of the most famed
Italian masters, principally to bring the serious
ness and gravity of that sort of musick into vogue
and reputation among our countrymen, whose
humour 'tis time now should begin to loath the
levity and balladry of our neighbours. The
attempt he confesses to be bold and daring ;
their being pens and artists of more eminent
abilities, much better qualified for the imploy-
ment than his or himself, which he well hopes
these his weak endeavours will in due time
provoke and enflame to a more accurate under
taking. He is not ashamed to own his unskilful-
ness in the Italian language, but that is the
PURCELL.
47
unhappiness of his education, which cannot justly
be counted his fault ; however he thinks he may
warrantably affirm that he is not mistaken in
the power of the Italian notes, or elegancy of
their compositions.' In the same year he com
posed an Ode or Welcome Song for the King,
' Fly, bold Rebellion,' and in July an Ode to
Prince George of Denmark on his marriage with
the Princess, afterwards Queen, Anne, — ' From
hardy climes.' He likewise composed an Ode
by Christopher Fishburn, ' Welcome to all the
pleasures,' which was performed Nov. 22 at the
annual celebration on St. Cecilia's^ Day, the score
of which he published in the following year.
He also composed another Ode, ' Raise, raise the
voice,' and a Latin Ode or motet, ' Laudate
Ceciliam,' in honour of St. Cecilia, both of which
still remain in MS. In 1684 ne composed an
Ode or Welcome Song, by Thomas Flatman, ' on
the King's return to Whitehall after his Summer's
progress ' — ' From these serene and rapturous
joys' — the last production of the kind he was to
address to Charles. In 1685 he greeted the new
king, James, with an Ode or Welcome Song,
'Why are all the Muses mute?' For the coro
nation of James and his queen on April 23 he
produced two anthems, ' I was glad,' and ' My
heart is inditing,' both remarkably fine com
positions. He was employed in superintending
the erection of an organ in the Abbey expressly
for the coronation, and was paid — out of what
was then termed the ' secret service money,' but
was really the fund for defraying extraordinary
royal expenses, — £34 I2S. od. 'for so much money
by him disbursed and craved for providing and
setting up an organ in the Abbey church of
Westmr. for the solemnity of the coronation, and
for the removing the same, and other services
performed in his said Ma' ties chappell since the
25th of March, 1685, according to a bill signed
by the Bishop of London.' In 1686 he returned
to dramatic composition, and produced the music
for Dryden's revived tragedy ' Tyrannic Love,'
in which is the fine duet of the spirits, Nakar
and Damilcar (or, as Purcell has it, Doridcar),
' Hark ! my Doridcar, hark ! ' and the pleasing
air, 'Ah ! how sweet it is to love.' He also
produced an Ode or Welcome Song for the King,
'Ye tuneful Muses.' In 1687 he composed an
other Ode of the same kind, 'Sound the trumpet,
beat the drum,' in which is the duet for altos,
'Let Cesar and Urania live,' which continued
so long in favour that succeeding composers
of odes for royal birthdays were accustomed to
introduce it into their own productions until
after the middle of the i8th century. Later in
the year Purcell wrote his anthem 'Blessed
are they that fear the Lord,' for the thanksgiving
for the queen's pregnancy, in January 1687-8.
In 1688 he composed the songs for D'Urfey's
comedy, 'A Fool's Preferment.' With one ex
ception they all belong to the character of Lionel,
a young man mad for love, and they express in
the most admirable manner the varied emotions
which agitate his mind — disdain, despondency,
tender affection and wild fantastic delusion.
48
PURCELL.
They were sung by William Mountford, the
unfortunate actor who was murdered in the
street by the ruffians Lord Mohun and Capt.
Hill in revenge for his having frustrated their
attempted forcible abduction of the celebrated
actress Mrs. Bracegirdle, and who, we learn from
Colley Gibber, ' sung a clear countertenor, and
had a melodious warbling throat.' The music
was published in 4to in the same year, and
appended to the printed copy of the comedy.
To this year also belongs a solo anthem for a
bass voice with chorus, ' The Lord is king ' (one
of the very few of Purcell's church compositions
of which the date of production is known), and
a Welcome Song for the King, the last he wrote
for James II. In 1689 he composed an Ode,
' Celestial Music,' which was ' performed at Mr.
Maidwell's, a schoolmaster's, on the 5th of August,'
and 'A Welcome Song at the Prince of Denmark's
coming home.' He also composed for the annual
gathering in London of the natives of the county
of York the famous Ode in praise of that county
and the deeds of its sons, particularly the part
taken by them at the Revolution, which is com
monly known as 'The Yorkshire Feast Song,'
and which D'Urfey (the author of the words)
justly calls 'one of the finest compositions he
ever made.' It was performed at an expense of
£100 sit the County Feast held in Merchant
Taylors' Hall, March 27, 1690. Many parts of
it were printed in the ' Orpheus Britannicus ' ;
it was printed entire by Goodison about 1788,
and by the Purcell Society 90 years later, under
the editorial care of Mr. W. H. Cummings. In
this year Purcell became involved in a dispute
with the Dean and Chapter of Westminster. He
had received money from persons for admission
into the organ-loft to view the coronation of
William and Mary, considering the organ-loft as
his, in right of hi s office ; but the Dean and Chapter
claimed the money as theirs, and called upon him
to pay it over ; and, upon his declining, went the
length of making an order, dated April 18, 1689,
that unless he paid over the money his place
should be declared null and void, and his stipend
detained by the Treasurer. It is presumed that
the matter was in some way accommodated, as he
retained his appointment until his death. In
1690 Purcell composed new music for Shadwell's
version of ' The Tempest,' in which the advan
tageous result of his study of the great Italian
masters is strikingly apparent. Smooth and
easy flowing, yet nervous melodies, clearness
and distinctness of form, and more varied ac
companiment, are conspicuous. Two of the songs,
' Come unto these yellow sands,' and ' Full fathom
five,' have retained uninterrupted possession of
the stage from the time they were composed till
this day, and much of the remainder of the
music, especially that of the concluding masque,
has only been laid aside because it is allied to
verses not by Shakspere, and which the better
judgment of our time has decreed shall no longer
be permitted to supplant his poetry. In the
same year Purcell produced the music for the
'alterations and additions after the manner of
PURCELL.
an opera' which Betterton had made to Beau
mont and Fletcher's play, ' The Prophetess, or,
The History of Dioclesian.' Here again the
great advance made by the composer is visible.
He calls into play larger orchestral resources
than before ; some of the movements are scored
for two trumpets, two oboes, a tenor oboe, and a
bassoon, beside the string quartet, and the wood
wind instruments are occasionally made responsive
to the trumpets and strings in a manner that
was then new. The vocal music comprises some
fine songs and bold choruses. Among the songs
may be named ' What shall I do to show how
much I love her?' (the air of which was long
known from its adaptation to the words ' Virgins
are like the fair flower in its lustre,' in 'The
Beggar's Opera') and 'Sound, Fame, thy brazen
trumpet,' with its bold and difficult obbligato
trumpet accompaniment. Purcell published the
score of this opera by subscription in 1691, with
a dedication to the Duke of Somerset, in which
he says, ' Musick and Poetry have ever been ac
knowledged sisters, which, walking hand in hand,
support each other ; As Poetry is the harmony
of words so Musick is that of notes ; and as
Poetry is a rise above Prose and Oratory, so is
Musick the exaltation of Poetry. Both of them
may excel apart, but surely they are most ex
cellent when they are joyn'd, because nothing is
then wanting to either of their proportions ; for
thus they appear like wit and beauty in the
same person. Poetry and Painting have arriv'd
to perfection in our own country ; Musick is yet
but in its nonage, a forward child, which gives
hope of what it may be hereafter in England
when the masters of it shall find more encourage
ment. 'Tis now learning Italian, which is its
best master, and studying a little of the French
air, to give it somewhat more of gayety and
fashion. Thus being further from the sun we
are of later growth than our neighbour countries,
and must be content to shake off' our barbarity by
degrees. The present age seems already disposed
to be refin'd, and to distinguish between wild
fancy and a just, numerous composition.' Here
we see PurcelPs modest estimate of the state of
English musical art in his day, but we may see
also that although he viewed his countrymen as
standing only upon the threshold of the temple
of music, he felt the strong conviction that it
would be within their power to enter and explore
its innermost recesses. The composer's desire to
please his subscribers occasioned him to fix the
subscription at so moderate a rate that it scarcely
sufficed to meet the expense of the publication.
He also wrote in 1690 the fine bass song, 'Thy
genius, lo ! from his sweet bed of rest,' for Lee's
tragedy 'The Massacre in Paris,' and the over
ture, act-tunes and songs for Dryden's comedy
'Amphitryon.' Besides these he set D'Urfey's
Ode for the queen's birthday, April 29, ' Arise,
my Muse,' — an admirable composition — and an
Ode for King William, ' Sound the trumpet.'
The next year witnessed the production of
Purcell's dramatic chef-d'oeuvre, 'King Arthur.'
He had previously composed music for some of
PURCELL.
Dryden's plays, but had had merely to set such
verses as the poet had handed him. It is how
ever apparent from Dryden's dedication of ' King
Arthur' that in constructing that drama he had
followed a different course, and had consulted
Purcell as to where, when, and how music could
be effectively introduced, and had acted upon
his suggestions. He had supplied the composer,
at his desire, with variety of measure, and dis
posed the scenes so as to afford striking contrasts.
Purcell's music is a succession of beauties ; —
the sacrificial scene of the Pagan Saxons ; the
martial song of the Britons, 'Come if you dare' ;
the scene with the spirits, Philidel and Grim-
bald ; the songs and dances of the shepherds ;
the admirably bold and original frost scene ; the
lovely duet of the Syrens in the enchanted forest,
'Two daughters of this aged stream,' and the
songs of the other spirits ; and the varied and
well contrasted pieces in the concluding masque
(including the beautiful melody ' Fairest isle, all
isles excelling'), form a combination which no
contemporary musician was able to equal, and
which for long afterwards remained unrivalled.
All contemporary testimony tells of the great
success of ' King Arthur,' yet, with the exception
of about a dozen songs which were included in
the ' Orpheus Britannicus,' and those portions of
the music which Arne retained in the version
made in 1770, it remained unpublished until
1 843, when it was printed by the Musical Anti
quarian Society, four songs, however, having
been lost in the interval. Purcell's other dramatic
compositions in 1691 were the overture and act
tunes for Elkanah Settle's tragedy ' Distressed
Innocence,' and songs in the comedy ' The Gor-
dian knot untyed,' and Southerne's comedy ' Sir
Antony Love.' He also composed the Ode for
the queen's birthday, ' Welcome, glorious morn. '
In 1692 he composed the music for Howard and
Dryden's * Indian Queen,' in which are the
recitative 'Ye twice ten hundred deities' (which
Burney considered to be ' perhaps the best piece
of recitative in our language'), with the air ' By
the croaking of the toad,' and the beautiful little
rondo ' I attempt from Love's sickness to fly.' The
greater part of the songs in ' The Indian Queen'
were printed in 1695 by May and Hudgebutt,
who prefixed to their publication a curious letter
to the composer informing him that as they had
met with the score of his work they had printed
it, lest others should put out imperfect copies,
and craving his pardon for their presumption.
The entire work was printed by Goodison. He
also composed songs tor Dryden's ' Indian Em
peror' (a sequel to 'The Indian Queen') and
'Cleomenes/ Southerne's comedy 'The Wives'
Excuse,' and D'Urfey's comedy ' The Marriage
Hater match'd,' and the music in the third act
of Dryden and Lee's tragedy '(Edipus.' But per
haps the most important dramatic composition he
produced this year was the opera of ' The Fairy
Queen,' an anonymous adaptation of Shakspere's
' Midsummer Night's Dream ' which was very
well received by the public, although the great
expense incurred for scenery, dresses, etc., ren-
VOL. III. PT. I.
PURCELL. 49
dered it but little productive to the managers.
The composer published in the same year ' Some
Select Songs as they are sung in The Fairy
Queen/ 10 in number ; 10 other pieces are in
the ' Orpheus Britannicus/ and the instrumental
music is in the ' Ayres for the Theatre ' ; the
Sacred Harmonic Society possesses a MS. of
nearly the whole of the fourth act, but the
remainder of the choral portions and two or
three more songs are irretrievably lost. The
score was lost in or before I7°°> *n October of
which year the patentees of the theatre offered
a reward of £20 for the recovery of it or a copy
of it. That they did not recover it may be
inferred from the piece never having been revived.
One of the songs which has been preserved, ' If
love's a sweet passion/ long remained in favour :
Gay wrote one of the songs in 'The Beggar's
Opera' to the air. In the same year Purcell set
Sir Charles Sedley's Ode for the queen's birth
day, ' Love's Goddess sure was blind/ One of
the airs in this Ode, 'May her blest example
chase/ has for its bass the air of the old song
'Cold and raw'; the occasion of which was
thus : — Queen Mary had one day sent for Arabella
Hunt and Gostling to sing to her, with Purcell
as accompanyist. After they had performed
several fine compositions by Purcell and others,
the queen asked Arabella Hunt to sing the
ballad of 'Cold and raw.' Purcell, nettled at
finding a common ballad preferred to his music,
but seeing it pleased the queen, determined that
she should hear it again when she least expected
it, and adopted this ingenious method of effecting
his object. He also set Brady's Ode 'Hail!
great Cecilia/ which was performed at the annual
celebration on St. Cecilia's day, Purcell himself
singing the alto song ' 'Tis Nature's voice/ This
Ode — one of the finest of its composer's works of
that class — was printed by the Musical Anti
quarian Society. In 1693 Purcell composed an
overture and act-tunes for Congreve's comedy
'The Old Bachelor/ and songs for D'Urfey's
comedy 'The Richmond Heiress/ Southerne's
comedy ' The Maid's Last Prayer/ and Bancroft's
tragedy ' Henry the Second.' He also set Tate's
Ode for the queen's birthday, ' Celebrate this
festival' (printed by Goodison), and his Ode in
commemoration of the centenary of the foundation
of Trinity College, Dublin, ' Great Parent, hail ! '
(also printed by Goodison), said to have been
performed at Christ Church, Dublin, Jan. 9,
1693-4. Strange to say, Trinity College register
does not contain any record of or allusion to the
centenary celebration. In 1694 Purcell composed
portions of the music for Parts I. and II. of
D'Urfey's 'Don Quixote' (Part {.containing the
duet 'Sing, all ye Muses/ and the fine bass song
'Let the dreadful engines'), an overture, act-
tunes and songs for Congreve's comedy, ' The
Double Dealer/ and songs for Crovvne's comedy
' The Married Beau/ Southerne's tragedy ' The
Fatal Marriage/ and Dryden's play 'Love
triumphant.' He also composed the Ode for the
queen's birthday, 'Come, come, ye Sons of Art' ;
and, for the Cecilian celebration, his celebrated
E
50
PURCELL.
' Te Deum and Jubilate in D,' with orchestral
accompaniments — the first of the kind produced
in this country. Queen Mary dying on Dec. 28
in this year, Purcell, immediately afterwards,
composed for her funeral the passage from the
Burial Service, ' Thou knowest, Lord, the secrets
of our hearts,' in a manner so solemn, pathetic,
and devout, that Croft, when setting the Burial
Service, abstained from resetting the passage,
and adopted Purcell's setting. Purcell also com
posed for the funeral an anthem, ' Blessed is the
man.' Early in 1695 he composed two Elegies
upon the queen's death, which were published
with one by Dr. Blow. He composed an Ode
for the birthday of the young Duke of Gloucester,
son of the Princess Anne, July 24, 'Who can
from joy refrain ?' and also the music for Powell s
adaptation of Beaumont and Fletcher's tragedy
'Bonduca,'1 including the famous war-song
' Britons, strike home1 ; and songs for Scott's
comedy 'The Mock Marriage,' Gould's tragedy
' The Rival Sisters,' Southerne's tragedy ' Oroo-
noko,' Ravenscroffc's comedy c The Canterbury
Guests/ Beaumont and Fletcher's play 'The
Knight of Malta,' and Part III. of D'Urfey's
' Don Quixote.' In the latter is contained ' the
last Song that Mr. Purcell sett, it being in his
sickness.' This was none other than the fine
cantata 'From rosy bowers/ one of the greatest
compositions he ever produced, and a most
striking proof that, however the composer's
frame might be enfeebled by disease, his mental
powers remained vigorous and unimpaired to
the last.
Purcell died at his house in Dean's Yard,
Westminster, Nov. 21, 1695. On the day of his
death he made his will, whereby he bequeathed
the whole of his property to his ' loveing wife,
Frances Purcell/ absolutely, and appointed her
sole executrix. It was said that he contracted the
disorder of which he died through his wife having
purposely caused him to be kept waiting outside
his own door because he did not return home
until a late hour. But this seems inconsistent
with the fact of his having made her his sole
legatee, and with her expressions respecting him
in the dedication of the ' Orpheus Britannicus.'
Sir John Hawkins's conjecture that he died of a
lingering, rather than an acute disease, probably
consumption, is much more likely- to be correct,
and more in accordance with the recorded fact of
Purcell's ability to continue to compose during
his mortal sickness. He was buried Nov. 26
in the north aisle of Westminster Abbey, under
the organ. A tablet to his memory, attached to
a pillar, and placed there by his pupil, Lady
Howard, wife of Sir Robert Howard, bears this
inscription, attributed, bub upon insufficient
grounds, to Dryden — ' Here lyes Henry Purcell,
Esq. ; who left this life, and is gone to that
blessed place where only his harmony can be ex
ceeded. Obiit 2 imo die Novembris, Anno ^Etatis
suss 37mo, Anno q : Domini, 1695.' 2 On a flat
i This was printed by the Musical Antiquarian Society,
'•a Other eminent composers have died ahout the same a?e a.s Fur-
cel', e.g. Pergolesi, Mozart, Schubert, Mendelssohn, and Weber.
PURCELL.
stone over his grave was inscribed the following
epitaph : —
Plaudite, felices sxiperi, tanto hospite, nostris
Praefuerat, vestris addite ille choris :
Invida nee vobis Purcellum terra reposcat,
Questa decus secli, deliciasque breves.
Tam cito decessisse, modo cui singula debet
Musa, prophana suos religiosa suos.
Vivit lo et vivat, dum vicina organa spirant,
Dumque colet numeris turba canora Deilm.3
This having long become totally effaced was,
a few years ago, renewed in a more durable
manner by a subscription originated by Mr.
James Turle, the present organist of the Abbey.
Purcell had six children, three of whom pre
deceased him, viz. John Baptist, baptized Aug.
9, 1682, buried Oct. 17, following; Thomas,
buried Aug. 3, 1 686 ; and Henry, baptized
June 9, 1687, buried Sept. 23, following. His
other children are mentioned hereafter. His
widow survived him until Feb. 1706. She died
at Richmond, Surrey, and was buried on Feb. 14,
in the north aisle of Westminster Abbey, near
her husband.
The compositions of Purcell not before men
tioned, and irrespective of his sacred music, were
' Ten Sonatas in four parts/ published by his
widow in 1697, the ninth of which, called, for its
excellence, the Golden Sonata, is given in score
in Hawkins's History (Novello's edit. 755);
Lessons for the Harpsichord or Spinnet, pub
lished in 1696; numerous catches included in
'The Catch Club, or Merry Companions,' and
other collections ; and many single songs which
are to be found in all the collections of songs of
the period. In 1697 his widow published, under
the title of ' A Collection of Ayres composed for
the Theatre and upon other occasions/ the in
strumental music in the plays of ' Abdelazor/
'The Virtuous Wife/ 'The Indian Queen/
'Dioclesian/ 'King Arthur,' 'Amphitryon/
' The Gordian Knot unty'd/ ' Distressed Inno
cence/ 'The Fairy Queen/ 'The Old Bachelor/
'The Married Beau/ 'The Double Dealer/ and
'Bonduca.' In 1698 she published, under the
title of ' Orpheus Britannicus/ a collection of
Purcell's songs for one, two, and three voices,
chiefly selected from his odes and dramatic
pieces, but including also several single songs,
amongst them the famous 'Bess of Bedlam.' A
second book was published in 1702. A second
edition of the first book, with large additions and
some omissions, appeared in 1 706, and a second
edition of the second book, with six additional
songs, in 1 7 1 1 . A third edition of both books,
now very rare, was issued in 1721. There is
another composition, which is now pretty gene
rally admitted to be the work of Purcell, viz.
the music for the first act of Charles Davenant's
tragedy ' Circe.' MS. scores are in the Fitz-
william Museum at Cambridge, the Sacred Har-
* Which has been thus rendered in English :—
'Applaud so great a guest, celestial pow'rs,
Who now resides with you, but once was ours ;
Yet let invidious earth no more reclaim
Her short-liv'd lav'rite and her chiefest fame ;
Complaining- that so prematurely died
Good-nature's pleasure and devotion's pride.
Died ? no, he lives while yonder organs sound,
And sacred echoes to the choir rebound.'
PURCELL.
monic Society's Library, and elsewhere. It was
probably composed for some projected revival of
the play, but, for reasons which cannot now be
discovered, the completion of the work by the
composition of music for the remainder of
the piece was not effected. Purcell also made
some valuable additions to the tract upon com
position in the later editions of Playford's ' In
troduction to the Skill of Musick.'
Purcell's sacred music consists of his church
services and anthems, hymns, songs, duets, etc.,
and Latin psalms. His church music may be
divided into two classes, viz. services and
anthems, with orchestral accompaniments, and
those with organ accompaniment only. The
former, with two or three exceptions already
mentioned, were composed for the Chapel Royal,
the latter for Westminster Abbey. Many of the
songs, duets, etc., and a few anthems were
printed in the several editions of ' Harmonia
Sacra,' 1688, 1693, 1714, etc., and several of the
services and anthems in the collections of Boyce,
Arnold, and Page. The noble collection edited
by Vincent Novello (1829-1832), under the title
of 'Purcell's Sacred Music,' includes the Te
Deum and Jubilate for St. Cecilia's day, 3
services, 5 chants by different members of the
Purcell family, a psalm-tune known as ' Burford,'
20 anthems with orchestral accompaniments, 32
anthems with organ accompaniment, 19 songs,
some with choruses, 2 duets, a trio, n hymns
for three and four voices, 2 Latin psalms, and
5 canons. MS. copies of 3 other anthems, a
hymn, and 2 Latin motets, which Novello was
unable to meet with, are now known to be in
existence.
It will have been observed that Purcell es
sayed every species of composition. He wrote
for the church, the theatre, and the chamber.
His church music exhibits his great mastery of
fugue, canon, imitation, and other scholastic de
vices, combined with fine harmony and expres
sive melody, and the introduction of novel and
beautiful forms, enriching it whilst preserving
its broad and solemn style. His secular music
displays his imaginative faculty, his singular
dramatic instinct and skill in marking character,
his rare gift of invention, and great powers of
expression. Although viewed by the light of
our own day, his instrumental chamber composi
tions appear of an inferior order, they will yet,
when compared with those of his predecessors
and contemporaries, be found greatly in advance
of his time. We see in him the improver of our
cathedral music ; the originator of English me
lody, as the term is now understood ; the esta-
blisher of a form of English opera which was
almost universally adopted for upwards of a
century and a half ; the introducer of a new and
more effective employment of the orchestra in
accompaniment ; the man who excelled all others
in his accurate, vigorous, and energetic setting of
English words; and the most original and ex
traordinary musical genius that our country has
produced. It is scarcely possible to estimate
the loss to English art by the early death of
PURCELL.
51
Henry Purcell. Had his life been prolonged for
him to have witnessed the introduction into Eng
land of the Italian opera and the early career in
this country of Handel, what might not have
been expected from him ?
Several portraits of Purcell are extant ; one,
taken when a chapel boy, was formerly in Dul-
wich College ; another, by Sir Godfrey Kneller
(engraved for Novello's ' Purcell's Sacred Music '),
was in the possession of the descendants of Joah
Bates ; a third was engraved as a frontispiece
to the Sonatas, 1683. John Closterman painted
two — one, now in the possession of the Royal
Society of Musicians, and engraved in mezzotint
by Zobel ; the other engraved by White for the
* Orpheus Britannicus,' which we have here repro
duced. Another, formerly in Dulwich College,
and engraved by W. N. Gardiner, has now dis
appeared.
4. EDWARD, youngest, but only surviving, son of
the great Henry Purcell, was baptized in West
minster Abbey, Sept. 6, 1689. He was therefore
(like his father) only six years old when his
father died. When sixteen years old he lost
his mother, who by her nuncupative will stated
that, ' according to her husband's desire, she had
given her deare son good education, and she alsoe
did give him all the Bookes of Musick in generall,
the Organ, the double spinett, the single spinett,
a silver tankard, a silver watch, two pairs of gold
buttons, a hair ring, a mourning ring of Dr.
Busby's, a Larum clock, Mr. Edward Purcell's
picture, handsome furniture for a room, and he
was to be maintained until provided for.' Em
bracing the profession of music, he became organ
ist of St. Clement, Eastcheap. On July 8, 1726,
he was appointed organist of St. Margaret's,
Westminster. He died about the end of July
or beginning of August, 1740. He left a
son, HENRY, who was a chorister of the Chapel
Royal, under Bernard Gates. On the death of
his father he succeeded him as organist of
E2
52
PURCELL.
St. Clement, Eastcheap. He afterwards became
organist of St. Edmund the King, Lombard Street,
and of St. John, Hackney. He died about 1750.
Hawkins says Edward Purcell wasagood organist,
but his son a very indifferent one.
5. FRANCES, eldest daughter of Henry Purcell,
the composer, was baptized in Westminster
Abbey May 30, 1688. In 1706 her mother
appointed her her residuary legatee and her ex
ecutrix, when she should reach the age of 18.
She proved the will July 6, 1706. She married,
shortly after her mother's death, Leonard Wel-
sted, Gent., poet and dramatist, and died 1724-
Her only daughter, FRANCES, born 1708, died
unmarried 1726. Her younger sister, MARY
PETERS, was baptized in Westminster Abbey,
Dec. 10, I693.1 It is presumed that she survived
her father, but predeceased her mother, as she is
not named in the latter's will.
6. DANIEL, the youngest son of Henry Purcell
the elder, born probably about 1660, was also a
musician, but from whom he received instruction
is unknown. - In 1688 he was appointed organist
of Magdalen College, Oxford. In 1693 he com
posed the music for Thomas Yalden's Ode on
St. Cecilia's Day, which was probably performed
at Oxford. In 1695 he resigned his appointment
at Magdalen College, and came to London. In
1696 he composed songs for Mary Pix's tragedy
' Ibrahim XII.' and Gibber's comedy ' Love's
Last Shift,' and the masque in the fifth act of
'The Indian Queen.' In 1697 he composed the
music for Powell and Verbruggen's opera 'Brutus
of Alba,' Settle's opera ' The New World in the
Moon/ and the instrumental music for D'Urfey's
opera 'Cynthia and Endymion.' In 1698 he
composed the songs inGildon's tragedy 'Phaeton,
or, The Fatal Divorce,' an Ode for the Princess
Anne's birthday, and Bishop's Ode on St. Cecilia's
Day. In 1699 he joined with Jeremiah Clark
and Richard Leveridge in furnishing the music
for Motteux's opera ' The Island Princess,' and
also set Addison's second Ode on St. Cecilia's
Day for Oxford. In 1700 he set Oldmixon's
opera 'The Grove,' and gained the third of
the four prizes given for the composition of Con-
greve's masque 'The Judgment of Paris,' the
others being awarded to John Weldon, John
Eccles, and Godfrey Finger. In 1701 he wrote
the instrumental music for Catherine Trotter's
tragedy 'The Unhappy Penitent,' and in 1702
that for Farquhar's comedy 'The Inconstant.'
In 1707 he composed an Ode for St. Cecilia's
Day, which was performed at St. Mary Hall,
Oxford. In 1713 he was appointed organist
of St. Andrew, Holborn, but was displaced in
Feb. 1717. He published 'The Psalmes set
full for the Organ or Harpsicord, as they are
plaid in Churches and Chappels in the maner
given out, as also with their Interludes of great
Variety ' ; a very singular illustration of the
manner in which metrical psalms were then per
formed. Six anthems by him are in the choir
books of Magdalen College, and songs in ' The
i One ' B. Peters ' was one of the witnesses to Purcell's will ;
probably he was godfather to this girl.
PURCELL CLUB.
Banquet of Musiek,' 1689 ; ' Thesaurus Musicus'
and 'Deliciee Musicae,' 1696; and 'Thesaurus
Musicus,' circa 1750. He composed ' A Lamen
tation for the Death of Mr. Henry PurceD,'
written by Tate, the words of which are prefixed
to the ' Orpheus Britannicus.' He was also
author of some sonatas for flute and bass and
violin and bass. He died in 1718. He was held
in great repute in his day as a punster.
7. KATHERINE, daughter of Henry Purcell the
elder, was baptized in Westminster Abbey,
March 13, 1662. She married in June 1691
the .Rev. William Sale, of Sheldwich, Kent, and
was her mother's administratrix, Sept. 7, 1699.
8. THOMAS, brother to Henry Purcell the elder,
was appointed Gentleman of the Chapel Royal in
1660. In 1 66 1 he was lay vicar of Westminster
Abbey and copyist. On Aug. 8, 1662, he was
appointed, jointly with Pelham Humfrey, Com
poser in Ordinary for the Violins to His Majesty,
and on Nov. 29 following, ' Musician in Ordinary
for the Lute and Voice in the room of Henry
Lawes, deceased.' In 1672 he was, with Hum
frey, made Master of the King's Band of Music.
He died July 31, and was buried in the cloisters
of Westminster Abbey, Aug. 2, 1682. He had
probably been long before in ill-health, as on
May 15, 1681, he granted a power of attorney
to his son Matthew to receive his salary as
Gentleman of the Chapel Royal. He was the
composer of the well-known Burial Chant and
other chants.2 [W.H.H.]
PURCELL CLUB, THE, was constituted at a
meeting held in August 1836 : the first members
were Messrs. Turle (conductor), King, Bellamy,
Fitzwilliam, J. W. Hobbs, and E. Hawkins
(secretary). The club was limited to twenty pro
fessional and twenty non-professional members,
who met twice a year ; on the second Thursday
in February, when they dined together, and on
the last Thursday in July, when they assembled
in Westminster Abbey, at the morning service,
by permission of the Dean, for the purpose of
assisting in such Purcell music as might be
selected for the occasion. On the evening of the
same day the members again met to perform
secular music composed by Purcell ; the soprano
parts were sung by the chorister-boys from West
minster Abbey, the Chapel Royal, and St. Paul's
Cathedral, but ladies were admitted amongst the
audience.
On Feb. 27, 1842, a special meeting was held,
when Professor Taylor was elected President, and
the dates of meeting were changed to Jan. 30
and the first Thursday in July. Interesting
performances of many of Purcell's works were
given year by year, and a book of words of 194
pages was privately printed for the use of the
members, under the editorship of Professor
Taylor. The Club was dissolved in 1863, and
the valuable library, which had been acquired
2 I am Indebted to Colonel Chester's Westminster Abbey Registers
for much of the family history contained in the above article, and
I gladly avail myself of this opportunity ot acknowledging my
obligations to that gentleman for the very kind and ready manner
In which he has furnished me with much valuable information on
many other occasions.
PURCELL CLUB.
by gift and purchase, was deposited at West
minster Abbey, under the guardianship of the
organists of Westminster Abbey and St. Paul's
Cathedral. [W.H.C.]
PURCELL COMMEMORATION, THE,
was held on Jan. 30, 1858, to celebrate the
bicentenary of Purcell's birth : the members of
the Purcell Club and a large number of pro
fessors of music and of eminent amateurs, anxious
to do honour to the greatest of English musi
cians assembled in the evening at the Albion
Tavern, Aldersgate Street, London, when, after
a banquet, a selection of Purcell music was per
formed, and some interesting addresses were
given by Professor Taylor, who presided. The
programme consisted entirely of music composed
by Purcell, and was as follows : — Grace, ' Gloria
Patri ' ; anthems ' 0 give thanks,' ' 0 God, thou
hast cast us out,' ' 0 sing unto the Lord' ; song and
chorus, ' Celebrate this festival' ; a selection from
' King Arthur'; cantata, ' Cupid the slyest rogue
alive'; song, ' Let the dreadful engines '; chorus,
' Soul of the world, inspired by thee.' [W.H.C.]
PURCELL SOCIETY, THE. Founded Feb.
21, 18 76, 'for the purpose' — in the words of the pro
spectus — 'of doing justice to the memory of Henry
Purcell, firstly by the publication of his works,
most of which exist only in MS., and secondly,
by meeting for the study and performance of his
various compositions.' The 'Permanent Com
mittee ' consists of the Rev. Sir F. A. G. Ouseley,
Bart.; G. A. Macfarren; Sir Herbert S. Oakeley;
Sir John Goss ; Sir George Elvey ; Joseph Barnby ;
Joseph Bennett ; J. F. Bridge ; W. Chappell ;
W. H. Cummings ; J. W. Davison ; E. J. Hop
kins ; John Hullah ; Henry Leslie ; A. H.
Littleton, Hon. Secretary ; Walter Macfarren ;
Julian Marshall; E. Prout; E. F. Rimbault;
Henry Smart; JohnStainer; Rev. J. Troutbeck;
James Turle. — The prospectus, issued May 16,
1876, contains a list of Odes and Welcome Songs
(28), and of Operas and Dramas (45), by Purcell ;
and an announcement that the first works pub
lished would be the Yorkshire Feast Song, and
the masque in ' Timon of Athens,' both in full
score. The Yorkshire Feast Song was issued on
Oct. 14, 1878, edited, with a preface, by Mr.
Cummings, and beautifully engraved and printed.
' Timon of Athens,' edited by the Rev. Sir F. A. G.
Ouseley, with a preface by Mr. Julian Marshall,
is now due. The subscription to the Society is
2 is. a year for the publications, and 105. 6d.
extra for the music meetings. [G.]
PURFLING (Fr. pourfiler}. The ornamental
border with which the backs and bellies of stringed
instruments are usually finished. It is the only
remnant of the elaborate decoration with which
stringed instruments were anciently covered. It
usually consists of a slip of maple or sycamore
glued between two slips of ebony. Some makers
used whalebone, as more pliable. A groove is
carefully cut all round the edges for its insertion,
and the purfling is then let in. Next to cutting
the scroll this is the most difficult operation in
nddle-inaking, as the purfling invariably breaks
PYE. 53
to pieces in the hands of the unskilled workman.
The secret consists in getting it well bent to the
required shape before letting it into the groove.
In the works of the best makers the purfling
is bold, even, solid, perfectly finished, and
accurately joined in the angles. The prince of
purflers was Stradivarius. Many, old instru
ments have a painted border instead of structural
purfling, and modern fiddles of the commonest
class have often only a double line in ink or
paint round the edges. Only a single strip of
purfling is usually employed ; but double pur
fling, which in general injures the tone without
improving the looks of an instrument, is often
found ; and instruments may be seen with a
second row of purfling by a different hand. The
purfling is not merely ornamental, as the groove
protects the body of the violin by checking frac
tures proceeding from the edge. In ornamental
instruments the purfling is sometimes inlaid with
mother of pearl. [E.J.P.]
PURITANI DI SCOZIA,!. Opera in 2 acts;
words by Count Pepoli, music by Bellini. Written
for Grisi, Rubini, Tamburini, and Lablache, and
produced at the Theatre Italien, Paris, Jan. 25,
1835. In London, at the King's Theatre, as 'I
Puritani ed I Cavalieri,' May 21, 1835. [G-]
PURITAN'S DAUGHTER, THE. 'Agrand
romantic drama ' in 3 acts ; words by J. V. Bridge-
man, music by Balfe. Produced at the English
Opera House, Covent Garden, London, Nov. 30,
1861 (Pyne and Harrison). [G.]
PUTZLI. ' Prince Fitzli Putzli ' was Beetho
ven's nickname for his friend Prince Lobkowitz.
See Thayer's Beethoven, iii. 239. [G.]
PYE, KELLOW JOHN, well known in London
musical circles ; the son of a merchant ; was
born at Exeter, Feb. 9, 1812. His musical ten
dencies showed themselves early. He entered
the Royal Academy of Music, London, in Feb.
1823, immediately after its foundation, and took
the first pianoforte lesson ever given within its
walls. This was under Cipriani Potter. He
also studied harmony, counterpoint, and compo
sition there, under Dr. Crotch, the Principal, and
remained a pupil till 1829. He then returned
to Exeter, and for some years enjoyed consider
able local fame in the south-west of England.
In 1834 he gained the Gresham medal for his
full anthem ' Turn Thee again, 0 Lord * (No-
vello), which with other anthems of his are in
use in the Cathedrals. In 1842 he took the
degree of Mus. Bac. at Oxford. Soon after this
he came to London, and though forsaking the
profession of music for business, retained his
connexion with the art by joining the direction
of the R.A.M. where he succeeded Sir G. Clerk
as chairman of the committee of management
(1864-67). He is also a member of the Execu
tive and Finance Committees of the Royal and
National College of Music (President H.R.H. the
Prince of Wales). His published works, besides
those mentioned, comprise ' Stray Leaves,' 1 2 nos.
(Lamborn Cock& Co.), 4 Full Anthems (Novello),
3 Short Full Anthems (Do.), Songs, etc. [G.]
54 PYNE.
PYNE, LOUISA FANNY, daughter of George
Pyne (alto singer, born 1790, died March 15,
1877), and niece of James Kendrick Pyne (tenor
singer, died Sept. 23, 1857), was born in 1832.
At a very early age she studied singing under Sir
George Smart, and about 1842 appeared in public
with her elder sister, Susan (afterwards Mrs.
Galton), with great success. In 1847 the sisters
performed in Paris. In Aug. 1849 Louisa made
her first appearance on the stage at Boulogne as
Amina in ' La Sonnambula.' On Oct. I follow
ing she commenced an engagement at the
Princess's Theatre as Zerlina, in an English ver
sion of 'Don Juan.' Her first original part was
Fanny in Macfarren's ' Charles the Second,' pro
duced Oct. 27, 1849. QU March 1850 she sang
at the Philharmonic ; was engaged the same year
at Liverpool, and in 1851 at the Hay market.
On Aug. 14, 1851, she performed the Queen
of Night in 'II Flauto Magico' at the Royal
Italian Opera. She also sang in oratorios and
POHLENZ.
at concerts. In Aug. 1854 she embarked for
America in company with her sister Susan, W.
Harrison, and Borrani. She performed in the
principal cities of the United States for three
years, being received everywhere with the
greatest favour. On her return to England she,
in partnership with Harrison, formed a company
for the performance of English operas, which
they gave first at the Lyceum and afterwards
at Drury Lane and Covent Garden Theatres,
until 1862, when the partnership was dissolved.
[See HARRISON, WILLIAM, vol. i. p. 6926]. Miss
Pyne subsequently appeared at Her Majesty's
Theatre. In 1868 she was married to Mr. Frank
Bodda, the baritone singer. She has now retired
from public life, and devotes herself to teaching.
Her voice was a soprano of beautiful quality
and great compass and flexibility ; she sang
with great taste and judgment, and excelled
in the florid style, of which she was a perfect
mistress. [W.H.H.]
PAPPENHEIM, EUGENIE, a soprano singer
who excited some attention in London for a
couple of years. She is an Austrian by birth,
and was first heard of at Mannheim, and then at
Hamburg, where she was one of the opera troupe
in 1872-75, and in 74 gave some 'Gastspiele'
at Kroll's Theatre, Berlin, with great success,
especially as Leonora (Fidelio). She next went
to America as a member of a German company
under Wachtel, and remained there till 1878, when
on June 1 5 she made a successful d^but in London,
at Her Majesty's Theatre, as Valentine in 'The
Huguenots.' She followed this with a perform
ance of Leonora in ' Fidelio,' and also appeared
in the following seasons as Donna Anna, the
Countess (Figaro), Leonora (Trovatore), Aida,
Eeiza, Agatha, and Elsa (Lohengrin). Though
not endowed with a voice of remarkable quality
or compass, Madame Pappenheim is thoroughly
good and careful both as a singer and an actress.
Her parts are always studied with care and con
scientiousness, and she is capable of considerable
dramatic intensity. She is now a member of the
German Theatre at Pesth. [A.C.]
PISCHEK, JOHANN BAPTIST, a fine baritone
singer, born Oct. 14, 1814, at Melnick in Bo
hemia, made his de"but on the boards at the age
of 21. In 1844 he was appointed Court-singer to
the King of Wurtemberg at Stuttgart, an appoint
ment which he retained until his retirement
July i, 1863. He entered on his duties May i,
1 844. At a later date he was also made ' Kam-
mersanger.' Pischek travelled a great deal, and
was known and liked in all the principal towns
of North and South Germany, especially at
Frankfort, where we find him singing, both oil
the stage in a variety of parts, and in concerts,
ytar after year from 1840 to 1848. In England
he was a very great favourite for several years.
He made his first appearance here on May i,
1845, at a concert of Madame Caradori Allan's ;
sang at the Philharmonic on the following Mon
day and thrice besides during the season there.
He reappeared in this country in 1846, 47, and
49, and maintained his popularity in the concert-
room, and in oratorio, singing in 49 the part of
Elijah at the Birmingham festival with great
energy, passion, and effect. On the stage of the
German opera at Drury Lane during the same
year his Don Juan was not so successful, his act
ing being thought exaggerated. He was heard
again in 1853 at the New Philharmonic Concerts.
He died at Stuttgart, Feb. 16, 1873.
In voice, enunciation, feeling, and style, Pischek
was first-rate. His repertoire was large, embracing
operas and pieces of Gluck, Mozart, Me'hul, Bee
thoven, Spohr, Weber, Donizetti, HeVold, Lach-
ner, Kreutzer, Linclpaintner. In his latter days
one of his most favourite parts was Hassan in
Benedict's ' Der Alte vom Berge ' (Crusaders) ;
others were Hans Heiling, Ashton (Lucia), and
the Jager, in the 'Nachtlager von Granada.' He
also sang Mendelssohn's Elijah, as already men
tioned. As an actor he was prone to exaggera
tion. But it was in his ballads, especially in
Lindpaintner's 'Standard-bearer,' that he carried
away his audience. His taste, as in Beethoven's
'Adelaide,' was by no means uniformly pure, but
the charm of his voice and style always brought
down the house. His voice was a fine rich bass,
with a very pure falsetto of 3 or 4 notes, which he
managed exquisitely. He does not seem to have
attempted any of the songs of Schubert, Schu
mann, or Mendelssohn, which are now so well
known. [A.C.]
POHLENZ, CHRISTIAN AUGUST, born July 3,
1790, at Saalgast in Lower Lusatia. In 1829
we find him well established in Leipzig as a
singing-master, a conductor of concerts, organist,
director of the Singakademie and the Musik-
verein, etc. At the end of 1834 he resigned the
post of Conductor of the Gewandhaus subscription
POHLENZ.
concerts, which he appears to have held for nine
years, and in which he was succeeded by Men
delssohn in the following October. After the
death of Weinlig, on March 6, 1842, and before
the appointment of Hauptmann later in the same
year, Pohlenz filled the office of Cantor at the
St. Thomas's School. Indeed, in the then state of
music at Leipzig, he seems to have been a person
of consideration, which is confirmed by the fact
of Mendelssohn's having chosen him as teacher of
QUANTZ.
55
singing in the new Conservator! um there, in the
prospectus of which his name appears, in the Allg.
Musikalische Zeitung of Jan. 1 8, 1843. He was
not however destined to take part in that good
work, for he died of apoplexy at Leipzig on
March 9, 1843, just three weeks before the oper
ations were begun. He published Polonaises for
the PF., but his best works are part-songs for equal
voices, of which one or two good specimens are
given in ORPHEUS. [See vol. ii. p. 613.] [G.]
Q.
QUADRILLE (German Contretanz), a
dance executed by an equal number of
couples drawn up in a square. The name
(which is derived from the Italian squadra) was
originally not solely applied to dances, but was
used to denote a small company or squadron of
horsemen, from 3 to 15 in number, magnificently
mounted and caparisoned to take part in a
tournament or carrousel. The name was next
given to 4, 6, 8, or 12 dancers, dressed alike,
who danced in one or more companies in the
elaborate French ballets1 of the i8th century.
The introduction of ' contredanses ' into the
ballet, which first took place in the 5th act of
Rousseau's 'Fetes de Polymnie' (1745), and
the consequent popularity of these dances,
are the origin of the dance which, at first
known as the ' Quadrille de Contredanses ' was
soon abbreviated into ' quadrille.' The quadrille
was settled in its present shape at the begin
ning of the i pth century, and it has undergone
but little change, save in the simplification
of its steps. It was very popular in Paris
during the Consulate and the first Empire, and
after the fall of Napoleon was brought to
England by Lady Jersey, who in 1815 danced
it for the first time at Almack's2 with Lady
Harriet Butler, Lady Susan Ryde, Miss Mont
gomery, Count St. Aldegonde, Mr. Montgomery,
Mr. Montague, and Mr. Standish. The English
took it up with the same eagerness which they
displayed with regard to the polka in 1845,
and the caricatures of the period abound with
amusing illustrations of the quadrille mania. It
became popular in Berlin in 1821.
The quadrille consists of five distinct parts,
which bear the name of the ' contredanses ' to
which they owe their origin. No. I is 'Le
Pantalon,' the name of which is derived from
a song which began as follows :
Le pantalon
De Madelon
N'a pas de fond,
and was adapted to the dance. The music
consists of 32 bars in 6-8 time. No. a is 'L'EteV
the name of a very difficult and graceful
1 The Ballets were divided into 5 acts, each act into 3, 6, 9, or 12
•entries,' and each 'entnSe' was performed by one or more
' quadrilles' of dancers.
2 See Captain Gronow's Keminiscences (1861).
' contredanse ' popular in the year 1800; it con
sists of 32 bars in 2-4 time. No. 3 is 'La
Poule ' (32 bars in 6-8 time) which dates from
the year 1802. For No. 4 (32 bars in 2-4 time)
two figures are danced, 'La Tre'nise,' named
after the celebrated dancer Treriitz, and ' La
Pastourelle,' perhaps a survival of the old
'Pastorale.' No. 5 — 'Finale' — consists of three
parts, repeated four times. In all these figures
(except the Finale, which sometimes ends with
a coda) the dance begins at the 9th bar of the
music, the first 8 bars being repeated at the end
by way of conclusion. The music of quadrilles
is scarcely ever original ; operatic and popular
tunes are strung together, and even the works
of the great composers are sometimes made use
of.3 The quadrilles of Musard are almost the
only exception; they may lay claim to some
recognition as graceful original musical com
positions. [W.B.S.]
QUANTITY. The duration of syllables, and
therefore the varieties of metrical feet. This is
fully explained under the head of METRE. [G.]
QUANTZ, JOHANN JOACHIM, celebrated flute-
player and composer, born, according to his
autobiography in Marpurg's ' Beitrage zur Auf-
nahme derMusik,' Jan. 30, 1697, at Oberscheden,
a village between Gb'ttingen and Miinden. His
father, a blacksmith, urged him on his death-bed
(1707) to follow the same calling, but, in his
own words, ' Providence, who disposes all for the
best, soon pointed out a different path for my
future.' From the age of 8 he had been in the
habit of playing the double-bass with his elder
brother at village fetes, and judging from this
that he had a talent for music, his uncle Justus
Quantz, Stadtmusikus of Merseburg, offered to
bring him up as a musician. He went to Merse
burg in August 1708,* but his uncle did not long
survive his father, and Quantz passed under the
care of the new Stadtmusikus, Fleischhack, who
had married his predecessor's daughter. For the
next 5 1 years he studied various instruments,
3 Some of our readers may recollect the clever ' Bologna Quadrilles'
on themes from Rossini's 'Stabat Mater,' which were published
shortly after the appearance of that work. The plates of these quad
rilles were destroyed on the publishers learning the source from
which the author had obtained the melodies.
* Not 1707, as Mendel states.
56
QUANTZ.
Kiesewetter being his master for the pianoforte.
In Dec. 1713 he was released from his apprentice
ship, and soon after became assistant, first to Knoll,
Stadtmusikus of Radeberg, and then to Schalle of
Pirna near Dresden. Here he studied Vivaldi's
violin-concertos, and made the acquaintance of
Heine, a musician in Dresden, with whom he
went to live in March 1716. He now had
opportunities of hearing great artists, such as
Pi^endel, Veracini, Sylvius Weiss, Richter and
Buffardin, the flute-player. In 1717 he went,
during his three months' leave, to Vienna, and
studied counterpoint in the octave with Zerlenka,
a pupil of Fux. In 1718 he entered the chapel
of the King of Poland, which consisted of 12
players, and was stationed alternately in War
saw and Dresden. His salary was 150 thalers,
with free quarters in Warsaw, but finding no
opportunity of distinguishing himself either
on the oboe, the instrument for which he was
engaged, or the violin, he took up the flute,
studying it with Buffardin. In 1723 he went
with Weiss to Prague, and the two played in
Fux's opera ' Costanza e Fortezza ' performed in
honour of the coronation of Charles VI. Here
also he heard Tartini. In !724Quantz accom
panied Count Lagnasco to Italy, arriving in
Rome on July II, and going at once for lessons
in counterpoint to Gasparini, whom he describes
as a 'goodnatured and honourable man.' In
1725 he went on to Naples, and there made the
acquaintance of Scarlatti, Hasse, Mancini, Leo,
Feo, and other musicians of a similar stamp.
In May 1726 we find him in Regeio and Parma,
whence he travelled by Milan, Turin, Geneva,
and Lyons to Paris, arriving on Aug. 15. In
Paris — where his name was remembered1 as
' Quouance ' — he remained seven months, and
occupied himself with contriving improvements
in the flute, the most important being the ad
dition of a second key, as described by himself
in his ' Versuch einer Anweisung die Flote zu
spielen/ vol. iii. chap. 58 (Berlin, 1752). He was
at length recalled to Dresden, but first visited
London for three months. He arrived there on
March 20, 1727, when Handel was at the very
summit of his operatic career, with Faustina,
Cuzzoni, Castrucci, Senesino, Attilio, and Tosi in
his train. He returned to Dresden on July 23,
1727, and in the following March re-entered the
chapel, and again devoted himself to the flute.
During a visit to Berlin in 1728 the Crown Prince,
afterwards Frederic the Great, was so charmed
with his playing, that he determined to learn the
flute, and in future Quantz went twice a year to
give him instruction. In 1 741 his pupil, having
succeeded to the throne, made him liberal offers
if he would settle in Berlin, which he did,
remaining till his death on July 12, 1773. He
was Kammermusicus and court-composer, with
a salary of 2000 thalers, an additional pay
ment for each composition, and 100 ducats for
each flute which he supplied. His chief duties
were to conduct the private concerts at the
Palace, in which the king played the flute, .and
i In Boivin's Catalogue.
QUARTET.
to compose pieces for his royal pupil. He left in
MS. 300 concertos for one and two flutes — of
which 277 are preserved in the Neue Palais at
Potsdam — and 200 other pieces ; flute solos, and
dozens of trios and quatuors, of which 37 are
to be found at Dresden. His printed works are
three — ' Sei Sonats* dedicated to Augustus III.
of Poland, Dresden, 1734; 'Sei duetti,' Berlin,
1 759 ; a method for the flute — ' Versuch einer
Anweisung die Flote traversiere zu spielen' dedi
cated to Frederick ' Konige in Preussen,' Berlin,
1752, 4to, with 24 copper-plates. This passed
through three (or four) German editions, and was
also published in French and Dutch. He left
also a serenata, a few songs, music to 22 of
Gellert's hymns, 'Neue Kirchenmelodien,' etc.
(Berlin, 1760), and an autobiography (in Mar-
purg's Beitragen). Three of the Melodien are
given by von Winter feld, 'Evang. Kircheng.' iii.
272. Besides the key which he added to the
flute, he invented the sliding top for tuning the
instrument. His playing, which was unusually
correct for the imperfect instruments of the day,
delighted not only Frederic, but Marpurg, a more
fastidious critic. He married, not happily, in
1737 ; and died in easy circumstances and gener
ally respected at Potsdam, July 12, 1773.
All details regarding him may be found in
' Leben und Werken,' etc., by his grandson Albert
Quantz (Berlin, 1877). [F.G.]
QUARLES, CHARLES, Mus. Bac., graduated
at Cambridge in 1698. He was organist of
Trinity College, Cambridge. He was appointed
organist of York Minster, June 30, 1722 ; and
died early in 1727. 'A Lesson ' for the harp
sichord by him was printed by Goodison about
1788. [W.H.H.]
QUARTERLY MUSICAL MAGAZINE
AND REVIEW, conducted by R. M. BACON of
Norwich. [See vol. i. 288 a ; vol. ii. 427(1.] [G.]
QUARTET (Fr. Quatuor ; Ital. Quartetto). A
composition for four solo instruments or voices.
I. With regard to instrumental quartets the
favourite combination has naturally been always
that of 2 violins, viola, and cello, the chief repre
sentatives since the days of Monteverde of soprano,
alto, tenor, and bass, in the orchestra : in fact,
when ' quartet ' only is spoken of, the ' string
quartet ' is generally understood ; any other com
bination being more fully particularised ; and it
is to the string quartet we will turn our principal
attention. The origin of the quartet was the
invention of four-part harmony, but it was long
before a composition for four instruments came
to be regarded as a distinct and worthy means
for the expression of musical ideas. Even the
prolific J. S. Bach does not appear to have favoured
this combination, though he wrote trios in plenty.
With the symphony was born the string quartet as
we now understand it — the symphony in minia
ture; and both were born of the same father,
Haydn. Although 24 bars comprise all the first
part of the first movement of Haydn's ist Quartet,
we see there the embryo which Beethoven de
veloped to such gigantic proportions,
QUARTET.
QUARTET.
57
Presto (1st subject.) ^
— /> — K~75 — 1 t^H • • r~
J*J
J-^
/ u" ft :
1
*
-j— » i
u~
• — 8n
((V)'1 ft — h — s-
K
— •
^J-^
- 1" 1
B
» /-f -fr 1 f U 1 p
L>
^^-
FT-P — d^?j-r
Hn5TTf*r
-• — »-
^^
^
' ^U
P
(Episode modulating into the dominant.)
(2nd subject.)
^^F^^rF
i.
These first quartets of Haydn seem to us
sadly feeble in the present day ; there is not
enough flesh to cover the skeleton, and the joints
are terribly awkward ; but there is the unmis-
takeable infant quartet, and certainly not more
clumsy and unpromising than the human infant.
The due proportions are all there too — in fact,
there are 5 movements instead of 4, Haydn
usually writing two minuets to these early
works. In the course of his long life and in
cessant practice in symphonic composition, Haydn
made vast progress, so that the later quartets
(op. 71, etc.) begin to show, in the lower parts,
some of the boldness which had before been only
allowed to the 1st violin. 83 quartets of Haydn
are catalogued and printed, while of the 93 of his
contemporary Boccherini, scarcely one survives.
Mozart, with his splendid genius for poly
phony as well as melody, at once opened up a
new world. In the set of 6 dedicated to Haydn
we notice, besides the development in form, the
development of the idea, which it has only been
given to Beethoven fully to carry out— the mak
ing each part of equal interest and importance.
Theoretically, in a perfect quartet, whether vocal
or instrumental, there should be no ' principal
part.' The six quartets just spoken of were so
far in advance of their time, as to be considered
on all sides as ' hideous stuff.' In our time we
find little that is startling in them, except perhaps
the famous opening of No 6, which will always
sound harsh from the false relations in the 2nd
and 4th bars.
Adaflio
Mozart's 26 quartets all live, the 6 dedicated
to Haydn, and the last 3 composed for the King
of Prussia, being immortal.
Those writers whose quartets were simply the
echo of Mozart's — such as Romberg, Onslow,
Hies, and Fesca — made no advance in the treat
ment of the four instruments.
It is not our province here to speak of the
growth of the symphonic form as exhibited in the
string quartet, this subject having been already
discussed under FORM, but rather to notice the
extraordinary development of the art of part-
writing, and the manner in which the most ela
borate compositions have been constructed with
such apparently inadequate materials. In these
points the quartets of Beethoven so far ellipse
all others that we might confine our attention
exclusively to them. In the very first (op. 18,
No. i) the phrase
,/
- "™!J .^r1
•
• F"'
/xU
V-W •!
C ••.'»,
i
— - -^-
of the ist movement is delivered so impartially
to each of the four players, as though to see what
each can make of it, that we feel them to be on
an equality never before attained to. If the 1st
violin has fine running passages, those of the 2nd
violin and viola are not a whit inferior. Does
the ist violin sing a celestial adagio, the cello is
not put off with mere bass notes to mark the
time. All four participate equally in the merri
ment of the scherzo and the dash of the finale.
This much strikes one in the earlier quartetsj
but later, when such writing as the following-
selected at random — is frequent,
we find that we are no longer listening to four
voices disposed so as to sound together harmo
niously, but that we are being shown the outline,
58
QUARTET.
QUARTET.
the faint pencil sketch, of works for whose actual
presentation the most perfect earthly orchestra
would be too intolerably coarse. The post
humous quartets are hardly to be regarded as
pieces written for violins, but we are rather forced
to imagine that in despair of finding colours deli
cate and true enough the artist has preferred to
leave his conceptions as charcoal sketches. This
fancy is borne out when we note how large a com
pass the four parts are constantly made to cover,
a space of nearly five octaves sometimes being
dashed over, with little care for the poorness and
scratchiness of tone thus produced.
The 1 6 quartets of Beethoven are all con
stantly before the musical public, the last four
naturally Jess frequently than the others.
There is a wide contrast between these stu
pendous works of genius and the polished and
thoroughly legitimate workmanship of Schubert's
quartets. Here we find everything done which
ought to be done and nothing which ought not.
They are indeed irreproachable models. One
little point deserves notice here as illustrating
the comparative strength of two great men : Bee
thoven gives frequent rests to one or two of the
players, allowing the mind to fill in the lacking
harmony, and thus producing a clearness, bold
ness and contrast which no other composer has
attained ; Schubert, on the other hand, makes all
four parts work their hardest to hide that thinness
of sound which is the drawback of the quartet.
Mention of Spohr's quartets might almost be
omitted in spite of their large number and their
great beauty. Technically they are no more ad
vanced than those of Haydn, the interest lying
too often in the top part. They also lose much
through the peculiar mannerism of the com
poser's harmon}-, which so constantly occupies
three of the parts in the performance of pedal
notes, and portions of the chromatic scale.
Still more than Schubert does Mendelssohn
seem to chafe at the insufficiency of four stringed
instruments to express his ideas. Not only this,
but he fails, through no fault of his own, in
one point needful for successful quartet-writing.
Beethoven and Schubert have shown us that
the theoretically perfect string-quartet should
have an almost equal amount of interest in each
of the four parts ; care should therefore be taken
to make the merest accompaniment-figures in the
middle parts of value and character. Tremolos
and reiterated chords should be shunned, and
indeed the very idea of accompaniment is barely
admissible. The quartet, though differing from
the symphony only in the absence of instru
mental colouring and limitation of polyphony,
is best fitted for the expression of ideas of a cer
tain delicacy, refinement and complexity, any
thing like boldness being out of place, from the
weakness of the body of tone produced. Now
the chief characteristic of Mendelssohn's music
is its broad and singing character, passage-writing
is his weak point. Consequently, however good
his quartets, one cannot but feel that they would
sound better if scored for full orchestra. Take
the opening of Op. 44, No. i, for instance —
jT— f
£
In the first place, this is not quartet-writing at
all ; there is a melody, a bass, and the rest is
mere fill-up matter : in the second, we have here
as thorough an orchestral theme as could be de
vised — the ear yearns for trumpets and drums in
the fourth bar. A similar case occurs in the
F minor Quartet (op. 80), and the expression
'symphony in disguise' has accordingly often been
applied to these works. This is curious, because
Mendelssohn has shown himself capable of ex
pressing his ideas with small means in other
departments. The 4-part songs for male voices,
for instance, are absolutely perfect models for
what such things ought to be. Schumann (op. 41)
is the only writer who can be said to have fol
lowed in the wake of Beethoven with regard to
using the quartet as a species of shorthand. All
his three quartets have an intensity, a depth
of soul, which, as with Beethoven, shrinks from
plainer methods of expression.
Of the earnest band of followers in this school
— Brahms (op. 51, 67), Bargiel, Bheinberger—
all that can be said is that they are followers.
If the quartet is yet capable of new treatment,
the second Beethoven who is to show us fresh
marvels has not yet come.
II. Quartets for strings and wind instruments
are uncommon, but Mozart has one for oboe,
violin, viola, and cello. Next to the string
quartet ranks the pianoforte quartet, which,
however, is built on quite a different principle :
here the composition becomes either equivalent
to an accompanied trio, or to a symphony in
which the piano takes the place of the ' string
quartet,' and the other instruments — usually
violin, viola, and cello — the place of wind in
struments. In any case the piano does quite
half the work. Mozart has written two such
quartets, Beethoven only one, besides three early
compositions, Mendelssohn three, while Brahms
(op. 23, 26, 60) and the modern composers have
favoured this form of quartet still more.
QUAKTET.
III. Vocal quartets are so called whether
accompanied by instruments or not. The 4 -part
songs of Mendelssohn have been mentioned.
No modern oratorio is considered complete with
out its unaccompanied quartet, Spohr having set
the fashion with his exquisite ' Blest are the de
parted' in the 'Last Judgment.' Modern opera is
learning to dispense with concerted music, Richard
Wagner having set the fashion. To enumerate the
fine operatic quartets from 'Don Giovanni' to
'Faust,' would be useless. In light opera the 'Spin
ning- wheel' quartet in ' Marta'standspre-eminent.
IV. The whole body of stringed instruments
in the orchestra is often incorrectly spoken of as
' the Quartet,' from the fact that until the time
of Beethoven the strings seldom played in other
than four-part harmony. It is now the usual
custom to write the parts for cello and double
bass on separate staves, and in Germany these
instruments are grouped apart, a practice which
is decidedly unwise, seeing that the double bass
requires the support of the cello to give the tone
firmness, more especially the German four-
stringed instrument, the tone of which is so
wanting in body.
V. The term is also applied to the performers
of a quartet, as well as to the composition
itself. [F.C.]
QUARTET, DOUBLE— for 4 violins, 2 violas,
and 2 cellos. This variety of quartet should bear
the same relation to an octet that a double
chorus bears to an 8-part chorus ; the parts
being divided into two separate sets of four.
Spohr's three Double Quartets (Op. 65, 77, 87)
are probably the only specimens in print. [F.C.]
QUARTETT ASSOCIATION, THE. A
society for the performance of chamber music,
started in 1852 by Messrs. Sainton, Cooper, Hill,
and Piatti, with such eminent artists as Sterndale
Bennett, Mile. Clauss, Mme. Pleyel, Miss God-
dard, Pauer, Charles Halle, etc., at the pianoforte.
They gave six concerts each season at Willis's
Rooms, but ended with the third season, the time
not having yet arrived for a sufficient support of
chamber music by the London public. The pro
grammes were selected with much freedom, em
bracing English composers — Bennett, Ellerton,
Loder, Macfarren, Mellon, etc. ; foreign musicians
then but seldom heard — Schumann, Cherubini,
Hummel, etc., and Beethoven's Posthumous
Quartets. The pieces were analysed by Mr.
Macfarren. [G.]
QUASI, as if— i. e. an approach to. ' Andante
quasi allegretto' or 'Allegretto quasi vivace'
means a little quicker than the one and not so
quick as the other — answering to poco allegretto,
or piu tosto allegro. [G.]
QUATRE FILS AYMON, LES. An opera
comique ; words by MM. Leuven and Brunswick,
music by Balfe. Produced at the Opera Comique,
Paris, July 15, 1844, and at the Princess's Theatre,
London, as ' The Castle of Aymon, or The Four
Brothers,' in 3 acts, Nov. 20, 1844. [G.]
QUAVER (Ger. Achtelnote ; Fr. Croche ; Ital.
Croma). A note which is half the length of a
QUAVER.
59
crotchet, and therefore the eighth part of a semi-
breve ; hence the German name, which signifies
'eighth-note.' It is written thus I*, its Rest be
ing represented by •;.
The idea of expressing the values of notes by
diversity of form has been ascribed by certain
writers to De Muris (about 1340), but this is
undoubtedly an error, the origin of which is
traced by both Hawkins (Hist, of Music) and
Fdtis (art. Muris) to a work entitled 'L'antica
Musica ridotta alia moderna Prattica,' by Vicen-
tino (1555), in which it is explicitly stated that
De Muris invented all the notes, from the Large
to the Semiquaver. It is however certain that
the longer notes were in use nearly 300 years
earlier, in the time of Franco of Cologne [NOTA
TION, vol. ii, p. 470], and it seems equally clear
that the introduction of the shorter kinds is of
later date than the time of De Muris. The fact
appears to be that the invention of the shorter
notes followed the demand created by the general
progress of music, a demand which may fairly
be supposed to have reached its limit in the
quarter-demisemiquaver, or ^ of a quaver,
occasionally met with in modern music.
The Quaver, originally called Chroma or Fiisa,
sometimes Unca (a hook), was probably invented
some time during the I5th century, for Morley
(i 597) saystbat' there were within these 200 years'
(and therefore in 1400) 'but four1 (notes) known
or used of the musicians, those were the Long,
Breve, Semibreve, and Minim' ; and Thomas de
Walsingham, in a MS. treatise written somewhat
later (probably about 1440), and quoted by Haw
kins, gives the same notes, and adds that ' of late
a New character has been introduced, called a
Crotchet, which would be of no use, would
musicians remember that beyond the minim no
subdivision ought to be made.' Franchinus Ga-
furius also, in his 'Practica Musicae' (1496)
quoting from Prosdocimus de Beldemandis, who
flourished in the early part of the I5th century,
describes the division of the minim into halves
and quarters, called respectively the greater and
lesser semiminim, and written in two ways, white
and black (Ex. i). The white forms of these notes
soon fell into disuse, and the black ones have be
come the crotchet 2 and quaver of modern music.
Greater Lesser
Semiminim. Semiminim.
^
l—^ N
The subdivision of the quaver into semiquaver
and demisemiquaver followed somewhat later.
Gafurius, in the work quoted above, mentions
a note ^ of a minim in length, called by various
I* 1
names, and written either ^ or 4 , but the true
v
1 There were really five, including the Large, which Morley calls
the Double Long.
2 It is worthy of notice that in the ancient manuscript by Eng
lish authors known as the Waltham Holy Cross MS., a note is
mentioned, called a ' simple,' which has the value of a crotchet, but
is written with a hooked stem like a modern quaver. That a note half
the value of a minim should at any period have been written with a
hook may help to account for the modern name crotchet, which
being clearly derived from the French croc, or crochet, a hook, is
somewhat anoma'ous as applied to *he note in its present form,
which has no hook.
60
QUAVER.
semiquaver or semickroma, the earliest form of
which was P , does not appear until later, while
the demisemiquaver must have been a novelty as
late as 1697, at least in this country, judging
from the I3th edition of Playford's ' Introduction
to the Skill of Musick,' in which, after describing
it, the author goes onto say 'but the Printer
having none of that character by him, I was
obliged to omit it.'
When two or more quavers (or shorter notes)
occur consecutively, they are usually grouped
together by omitting the hooks and drawing a
thick stroke across their stems, thus JjjJ. The
credit of having invented this great improvement
in notation is due, according to Hawkins, to John
Playford, whose example in this matter was soon
followed by the Dutch, and afterwards by the
French and Germans. In Playford's ' Introduc
tion etc.' the notes are described as ' Tyed together
by a long stroke on the Top of their Tails',' and it
is curious that in the example he gives (Ex. 2)the
characteristic hook of the quaver or semiquaver
is allowed to appear at the end of each group.
As late as the I3th edition, however (1697), the
examples throughout Playford's book, with the
single exception of the one just quoted, are
printed with separate quavers and semiquavers
and it is not until the I5th edition (1703) which
is announced as 'Corrected, and done on the
New Ty'd-Note,' that the notes are grouped as
in modern music.
In vocal music, notes which have to be sung
to separate syllables are written detached, while
those which are sung to a single syllable are
grouped ; for example —
The peo-ple that walk-ed in dark - - - ness, that
[F.T.]
QUEISSER, CARL TRATJGOTT, a great trom
bone player, was born of poor parents at Doben,
near Leipzig, Jan. n, 1800. His turn for music
showed itself early, and he soon mastered all the
ordinary orchestral instruments. He ultimately
confined himself to the viola, and to the trombone,
which he may really be said to have created, since,
for instance, the solo in the Tuba mtrum of
Mozart's Requiem was before his time usually
played on a Bassoon. In 1817 he was appointed
to play violin and trombone in the town
orchestra, and by 1830 had worked his way
into the other orchestras of Leipzig, including
that of the Gewandhaus. He played the viola
in Matthai's well-known quartet for many years ;
was one of the founders of the Leipzig ' Euterpe,'
and led its orchestra for a long time ; and in short
QUINTET.
was one of the most prominent musical figures
in Leipzig during its very best period.
As a solo trombone-player he appeared fre
quently in the Gewandhaus Concerts, with con
certos, concertinos, fantasias and variations,
many of them composed expressly for him by
C. G. Miiller, F. David, Meyer, Kummer, and
others ; and the reports of these appearances rarely
mention him without some term of pride or
endearment. 'For fulness, purity and power of
tone, lightness of lip, and extraordinary facility
in passages,' says his biographer,1 ' he surpassed
all the trombone-players of Germany.' There
was a Leipzig story to the effect that at the first
rehearsal of the Lobgesang, Queisser led off the
Introduction as follows : —
— r—
-23
•-•pp. f • "^lE
^-U^— ^
to Mendelssohn's infinite amusement. Se non. e
vei'o, e ben trovato.
Queisser was well-known throughout Germany,
but appears never to have left his native country.
He died at Leipzig June 12, 1846. [U.]
QUICK-STEP (Fr. Pas redouble, Ger. Gesch-
wind Marscli) is the English name for the music
of the Quick march in the army, a march in which
116 steps of 30 inches go to the minute. (See
Boost's Journal of Marches. Quicksteps, Dances,
etc.) It may be well to mention that in the
Slow march there are 75 steps of 30 inches, and
in the ' Double ' 165 of 33 inches. [See MARCH,
vol. ii. p. 212.] [G.]
QUILISMA. An antient form of Neuma,
representing a kind of Shake. [See NOTATION,
p. 468a.] [W.S.E.]
QUINAULT, PHILIPPE, eminent French dra
matist, born in Paris 1635, died Nov. 26, 1688,
may be considered the creator of a new branch
of the drama, the lyric tragedy. The numerous
operas which he wrote for Lully long served as
models to other French dramatic authors, and
are still worthy of notice for their literary merit,
and the smoothness and melody of the versifica
tion. [G.C.]
QUINTA FALSA (False Fifth). The for
bidden Interval, between Mi, in the Hexachordon
durum, and Fa, in the Hexachordon naturale—
the Diminished Fifth of modern Music. [See Mi
CONTRA FA.] [W.S.K.]
QUINTET (Fr. Quintuor-, Ital. Quintette). A
composition for five instruments or voices with
or without accompaniment.
I. Quintets for strings have been far less written
than quartets, owing to the greater complexity
demanded in the polyphony. Boccherini, however,
published 125, of which 12 only were written for
2 violins, 2 violas, and I cello, the others having
2 cellos and i viola. The former is the more
usual choice of instruments, probably because the
lower parts are apt to be too heavy sounding
with two cellos, owing to the greater body of
1 Allg. muslkalische Zeitung, July 8. 1846.
QUINTET.
tone in this instrument. Schubert's noble Quintet
in C (op. 163), is for 2 cellos, but the first cello
is used constantly in its upper octave, soaring
above the viola. Onslow's — 34 in number — are
for a double bass and cello.
Beethoven's two Quintets, in Eb and C, be
long to his earlier periods, and have therefore
none of the extraordinary features of the later
quartets. Mendelssohn's Quintet in Bb (op. 87),
is so orchestral as to seem almost a symphony in
disguise, but that in A (op. 18) is an exquisite
specimen of what a string quintet should be.
Many other combinations of five instruments
have found favour with musicians, mostly in
cluding a pianoforte. Thus there is Mozart's
Quintet in Eb for oboe, clarinet, horn, bassoon,
and piano — which the composer esteemed the
best thing he ever wrote, — the beautiful one for
clarinet and strings, and another for the piquant
combination of flute, oboe, viola, cello, and
musical glasses. Perhaps the most effective
association is that of piano, violin, viola, cello,
and double bass, as in Schubert's well-known
' Trout ' Quintet (op. 114). Beethoven's Quintet
for piano and wind instruments (op. 16), in Eb,
is a noble representative of a very small class.
Hummel has also written a well-known one.
II. In vocal music none who have ever heard
it can forget the admirable quintet (for 2 soprani,
contralto, tenor, and bass) which forms the
finale to Act I of Spohr's ' Azor and Zemira.'
In modern opera two most striking specimens
occur in Goetz's ' Widerspanstige Zahmung,'
and Wagner's ' Meistersinger.' Five-part har
mony has a peculiarly rich effect, and deserves
to be more practised than it is, especially in
oratorio chorus. It is, however, by no means
easy to write naturally. [F.C.]
QUINTOYER (Old Eng. Quinible). To sing
in Fifths — a French verb, in frequent use among
extempore Organizers during the Middle Ages.
[See ORGANUM, PART-WRITING.] [W.S.R.]
QUINTUS (the Fifth). The Fifth Part in
a composition for five Voices : called also Pars
quinta and Quincuplum. In Music of the I5th
and 1 6th centuries, the Fifth Part always
corresponded exactly, in compass, with one of
the other four ; it would, therefore, have been
impossible to describe it as First or Second
Cantus, Altus, Tenor, or Bassus. [W.S.R.]
QUINTUPLE TIME. The rhythm of five
beats in a bar. As a rule, quintuple time has
two accents, one on the first beat of the bar, and
the other on either the third or fourth, the bar
being thus divided into two unequal parts. On
this account it can scarcely be considered a dis
tinct species of rhythm, but rather a compound of
two ordinary kinds, duple and triple, employed
alternately. Although of little practical value,
quintuple time produces an effect sufficiently
characteristic and interesting to have induced
various composers to make experiments therein,
the earliest attempt of any importance being
probably an air to the words ' Se la sorte mi
condanna' in the opera of ' Ariadne' by Adolfati,
QUINTUPLE TIME.
61
written in 1750, and it is also met in some of the
national airs of Spain, Greece, Germany, etc.
Thus Reicha, in a note to No. 20 of his set of 36
fugues (each of which embodies some curious
experiment in either tonality or rhythm), states
that in a certain district of the Lower Rhine,
named Kochersberg, the airs of most of the
dances have a well-marked rhythm of five beats,
and he gives as an example the following waltz—
T
•
In the above example the second accent falls on
the third beat, the rhythm being that of 2-8 fol
lowed by 3-8, and the same order is observed in a
very charming movement by Hiller, from the Trio
op. 64, in which the quintuple rhythm is expressed
by alternate bars of 2-4 and 3-4, as follows —
Non troppo vivo
s
£
In Reicha's fugue above referred to, the reverse
is the case, the fourth beat receiving the accent,
as is shown by the composer's own time-signature,
as well as by his explicit directions as to per
formance. The following is the subject : —
Allegretto.
Other instances of quintuple rhythm are to be
found in a Trio for strings by K. J. Bischoff, for
which a prize was awarded by the Deutsche
Tonhalle in 1853, in Chopin's Sonata in C minor,
op. 4, in Killer's 'Rhythmische Studien ' op. 52,
etc. ; but perhaps the most characteristic example
occurs in the 'Gypsies' Glee,' by W. Reeve (i 796),
the last movement of which runs as follows.
Allegro.
=£=*=£: "
'
Come, stain your cheeks with nut or
'-
ber - ry.
N >
:
t
Come, stain your cheeks with nut or ber - ry.
This may fairly be considered an example of
genuine quintuple rhythm, for instead of the
usual division of the bar into two parts, such as
might be expressed by alternate bars of 3-4 and
2-4, or 2-4 and 3-4, there are five distinct beats
in every bar, each consisting of an accent and a
non- accent. This freedom from the ordinary
alternation of two and three is well expressed by
the grouping of the accompaniment, which varies
throughout the movement, after the manner
shown in the following extract : —
62
QUINTUPLE TIME.
[F.T.]
QUIRE. Another mode of spelling CHOIR. [G.]
QUODLTBET (Lat. 'What you please'), also
called QUOTLIBET ('As many as you please'),
and in Italian MESSANZA or MISTICHANZA ('A
mixture'). This was a kind of musical joke in
the 1 6th and early part of the I7th centuries, the
fun of which consisted in the extempore juxta
position of different melodies, whether sacred or
secular, which were incongruous either in their
musical character, or in the words with which
they were associated ; sometimes, however, the
words were the same in all parts, but were sung
in snatches and scraps, as in the quodlibets of
Melchior Franck. (See Prsetorius, Syntagma
Musicum, torn. iii. cap. v.) There were two ways
of performing this : one was to string the melodies
together simply and without any attempt at con
necting them by passages such as those found in
modern • fantasias' ; the other, the more elaborate
method, consisted in singing or playing the melo
dies simultaneously, the only modifications al
lowed being those of time. The effect of this,
unless only very skilful musicians engaged in it,
must have been very like what we now call a
' Dutch chorus.' This pastime was a favourite
one with the Bachs, at whose annual family
gatherings the singing of quodlibets was a great
feature. (See Spitta, 'J. S. Bach,' i. 152, ii.
654.) Sebastian Bach himself has left us one
delightful example of a written-down quodlibet,
at the end of the '30 variations' in G- major,
for a detailed analysis of which see Spitta, ii. 654.
The two tunes used in it are ' Ich bin so lang bei
dir nicht gewest,' and 'Kraut und Ruben, Haben
mich vertrieben.' One of the best modern ex
amples, although only two themes are used, is in
Reinecke's variations for two pianos on a gavotte
of Gluck's, where, in the last variation, he brings
in simultaneously with the gavotte the well-known
musette of Bach which occurs in the third ' Eng
lish' suite. A good instance, and one in which the
RAAFF.
extempore character is retained, is the singing of
the three tunes 'Polly Hopkins,' 'Buy a broom,'
and 'The Merry Swiss Boy,' together, which is
sometimes done for a joke. A very interesting
specimen of a 16th-century quodlibet by Johann
Goldel, consisting of five chorale-tunes — viz. (i)
' Erhalt uns. Heir bei deinem Wort,' (2) 'Ach
Gott, vom Himmel,' (3) ' Vater unser im Himmel-
reich,' (4) ' Wir glauben all,3 (5) ' Durch Adam's
Fall ' — is given as an appendix to Hilgenfeldt's
Life of Bach. We quote a few bars as an
example of the ingenuity with which the five
melodies are brought together : —
au^-j-j.yi M j
J " 1 "
-
-J
• • 1
_l
1-^ 1 ••"'•la J &
?~ ^^ J
J b.I
p* "
-_*"
/T\
etc.
\J/
[J.A.F.M.]
E.
RAAFF, ANTON, one of the most distin
guished tenors of his day; born 1714 in
the village of Holzem, near Bonn, and
educated for the priesthood at the Jesuit College
at Cologne. There he learned his notes for the
first time at 20 years old, having previously
sung by ear. His fine voice so struck the
Elector Clement Augustus, that he offered to
have him trained for a singer, and after making
him sing in an oratorio, took him to Munich,
where Ferrandini brought him forward in an
opera. Raaff then determined to devote himself
entirely to music, and after studying for a short
time with Bernacchi at Bologna, became one of
the first tenors of the day. In 1738 he sang at
Florence on the betrothal of Maria Theresa, and
followed up this successful de"but at many of the
Italian theatres. In 1742 he returned to Bonn,
and sang at several of the German courts, par
ticularly at Vienna, where he appeared in
RAAFF.
Jomelli's 'Didone' (1749), to Metastasio's great
satisfaction. In 1752 ne passed through Italy
to Lisbon, where he was engaged for three years
on highly advantageous terms. In 1755 he ac
cepted a summons to Madrid, where he remained
under Farinelli's direction, enjoying every possible
mark of favour from the court and public. In
1759 he accompanied Farinelli to Naples, where
he afterwards met with Naumann, and where his
fine singing cured the Princess Belmonte Pigna-
telli of a profound melancholy into which she
had fallen on the death of her husband. In 1770
he returned to Germany and entered the service
of the elector, Karl Theodor, at Mannheim. In
1778 he was in Paris with Mozart, and in 17 79
he followed the court to Munich, where Mozart
composed the part of Idomeneo for him. Soon
afterwards he quitted the stage, and took to
teaching singing, but his pupils left him on
account of his extreme strictness. Towards the
close of his life he gave up music entirely, giving
away his piano and his music, and abandoning
himself to contemplation. He died in Munich,
May 27, 1797. ' RaafF's voice was the finest
possible tenor, full, pure in tone, and even
throughout the register, from deep bass to ex
treme high notes. He was moreover a complete
master of the art of singing, as is shown by his
extraordinary power of reading at sight, by the
skill with which he introduced variations and
cadenzas, and by his wonderful expression, which
made his singing seem an accurate reflection of
his mind and heart. Another admirable quality
was his pure and distinct pronunciation of the
words, every syllable being audible in the largest
space.' Mozart in his letters speaks of him as
his 'best and dearest friend,' especially in one
from Paris, dated June 12, 1778. He composed
for him in Mannheim the air, ' Se al labro mio
non credi ' (Kochel 295). [C.F. P.]
RACCOLTA GENERALE DELLE OPERE
CLASSICHE MUSICALI. A collection of pieces of
which the full title is as follows : — ' Collection
ge"ne"rale des ouvrages classiques de musique, ou
Choix de chefs d'oeuvres, en tout genre, des plus
grands compositeurs de toutes les Ecoles, recu-
eillis, mis en ordre et enrichis de Notices bis-
toriques, par Alex. E. Choron, pour servir de
suite aux Principes de Composition des e"coles
d'ltalie.' A notice on the wrapper further
says that the price of the work to subscribers
is calculated at the rate of 5 sous per page, thus
curiously anticipating Mr. Novello's famous re
duction of his publications to 2\d. per page. The
numbers were not to be issued periodically, but
the annual cost to subscribers was fixed at from
36 to 40 francs. The work was in folio, en
graved by Gille fils, and published by Leduc & Co.,
Paris, Rue de Richelieu, 78, with agents at Bor
deaux, Marseilles, Leipzig, Munich, Vienna, Ly on,
Turin, Milan, Rome and Naples. It was got up
with great care and taste. The parts are in
blue-gray wrappers, with an ornamental title.
The only numbers which the writer has been
able to discover are as follows : — No. I, Miserere
a 2 core, Leo ; No. 2, Missa ad fugam, Pales-
RADZIWIL.
63
trina (a 4) ; No. 3, Stabat, Palestrina (8 voices);
No. 4, Stabat, Josquin (a 5) ; No. 5, Miserere a
cinque voci, Joinelli ; No. 6, Missa pro defunctis,
Jomelli. It is probable that the issue of the
work did not continue beyond these six pieces.
For ALFIERI'S ' Raccolta di inusica sacra ' see
Appendix. [G.]
RADICAL CADENCE. A term applied, in
modern Music, to a Close, either partial or com
plete, formed of two Fundamental Chords. [See
CADENCE.] [W.S.R.]
RADZIWIL, ANTON HEINKICH, Prince of,
Royal Prussian 'Statthalter' of the Grand Duchy
of Posen, born at Wilna, June 13, 1775, married
in 1 796 the Princess Luise, sister of that dis
tinguished amateur Prince Louis Ferdinand of
Prussia. [See vol. ii. p. 1686.] Radziwil was
known in Berlin not only as an ardent admirer
of good music, but as a fine violoncello player,
and 'a singer of such taste and ability as is
very rarely met with amongst amateurs.' l Bee
thoven was the great object of his admiration.
He played his quartets with devotion, made a
long journey to Prince Galitzin's on purpose to
hear the Mass in D, was invited by Beethoven
to subscribe to the publication of that work, and
indeed was one of the seven who sent in their
names in answer to that appeal. To him Bee
thoven dedicated the Overture in C, op. 115
(known as ' Namensfeier '), which was published
as ' Grosses Ouverture in C &UT gedichtet ' etc., by
Steiner of Vienna in 1.825.
Further relations between the Prince and the
composer there must have been, but at present
we know nothing of them. No letters from Bee
thoven to him are included in those hitherto pub
lished, nor has Mr. Thayer yet thrown any light
on the matter in his biography of the composer.
Radziwil was not only a player, a singer,
and a passionate lover of music, he was also a
composer of no mean order. Whistling's ' Hand-
buch' (1828) names 3 Romances for voice and
PF. (Peters), and songs with guitar and cello
(B. & H.), and Mendel mentions duets with PF.
accompaniment, a Complaint of Maria Stuart,
with PF. and cello, and many part-songs com
posed for Zelter's Liedertafel, of which he was an
2 enthusiastic supporter, and which are still in MS.
But these were only preparations for his great
work, entitled ' Compositions to Goethe's dramatic
poem of Faust.' This, which was published in
score and arrangement by Trautwein of Berlin
in Nov. 1835, contains 25 numbers, occupying
589 pages. A portion was sung by the Sing-
akademie as early as May I, 1810 ; the choruses
were performed in May 1816, three new scenes
as late as Nov. 21, 1830, and the whole work
was brought out by that institution after the
death of the composer, which took place April
8, 1833. The work was repeatedly performed
during several years in Berlin, Dantzig, Han
over, Leipzig, Prague, and many other places, as
maybe seen from the index to the A.M. Zeitung.
1 A.M.Z. 1831, July 27. See also 1R09, June 28 ; 1814, Sept. 28.
2 Zelter's Correspondence with Goethe teems with notices of the
Prince.
64
RADZIWIL.
It curiously made its appearance in a performance
at Hyde Park College, London, on May 21, 1880,
under the direction of L. Martin-Eiffe. A length
ened analysis of it will be found in the A. M.
Zeitung for 1836, pp. 601, 617; and there is a
copy in the British Museum. [G.]
RAFF, JOSEPH JOACHIM, born May 2 7, i822,at
Lachen on theLake of Zurich. He received his early
education at Wiesenstetten in Wiirtemberg, in the
home of his parents, and then at the Jesuit Lyceum
of Schwyz, where he carried off the first prizes
in German, Latin, and mathematics^ Want of
means compelled him to give up his classical
studies, and become a schoolmaster, but he stuck
to music, and though unable to afford a teacher,
made such progress not only with the piano and
the violin, but also in composition, that Men
delssohn, to whom he sent some MSS.,gave him in
1843 a recommendation to Breitkopf & Hartel.
This introduction seems to have led to his ap
pearing before the public, and to the first drops
of that flood of compositions of all sorts and
dimensions which since 1844 he has poured forth
in an almost unintermitting stream. Of Opus I
we have found no critical record ; but op. 2 is
kindly noticed by the N. Zeitschrift (Schumann's
paper) for Aug. 5, 1844, the reviewer finding in
it 'something which points to a future for the
composer.' Encouraging notices of ops. 2 to 6
inclusive are also given in the A. M. Zeitung for
the 2 ist of the same month. Amidst privations
which would have daunted any one of less deter
mination he worked steadily on, and at length
having fallen in with Liszt, was treated by him
with the kindness which has always marked his
intercourse with rising or struggling talent, and
was taken by him on a concert-tour. Meeting
Mendelssohn for the first time at Cologne in
1846, and being afterwards invited by him to
become his pupil at Leipzig he left Liszt for that
purpose. Before he could carry this project into
effect, however, Mendelssohn died, and Raff re
mained at Cologne, occupying himself inter alia
in writing critiques for Dehn's Cacilia. Later
he published 'Die Wagneifrage/ a pamphlet
which excited considerable attention. Lizst's
endeavours to secure him a patron in Vienna
in the person of Mechetti the publisher, were
frustrated by Mechetti's death while Raff was
actually on the way to see him. Undismayed
by these repeated obstacles he devoted himself
to a severe course of study, partly at home and
partly at Stuttgart, with the view to remedy the
deficiencies of his early training. At Stuttgart
he made the acquaintance of Bu'low, who be
came deeply interested in him, and did him a
great service by taking up his new Concertstiick,
for PF. and orchestra, and playing it in public.
By degrees Raff attached himself more and
more closely to the new German school, and in
1850 went to Wtitnar to be near Liszt, who had
at that time abandoned his career as a virtuoso
and was settled there. Here he remodelled an
opera ' Konig Alfred,' which he had composed
in Stuttgart three years before, and it was pro
duced at the Court Theatre, where it is still
RAFF.
often performed. It has also been given else
where. Other works followed — a collection of
PF. pieces called ' Fruhlingsboten ' in 1852,
the first string quartet in 1855, and the first
grand sonata for PF. and violin (E minor) in
1857. In the meantime he had engaged himself
to Doris Genast, daughter of the well known actor
and manager, and herself on the stage ; and in
1856 he followed her to Wiesbaden, where he
was soon in great request as a pianoforte teacher.
In 1858 he composed his second violin-sonata,
and the incidental music for 'Bernhard von Wei
mar,' a drama by Wilhelm Genast, the overture
to which speedily became a favourite, and was
much played throughout Germany. In 1859 he
married. In 1863 his first symphony 'An das
Vaterland' obtained the prize offered by the
Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde in Vienna (out
of 32 competitors), and was followed by the 2nd
(in C) and the 3rd (in F, ' Im Walde ') in 1869,
the 4th (in G minor) in 1871, the 5th (' Lenore')
in 1872, the 6th ('Gelebt, gestrebt, gelitten, ge-
stritten, gestorben, umworben') in 1876, and the
7th ('Alpensinfonie') in 1877, the 8th ('Friih-
lingsklange') in 1878, and the Qth 'Im Sommer-
zeit' in 1 880. A loth ('Zur Herbstzeit') was lately
played at Wiesbaden. In 1870 his comic opera
' Dame Kobold ' was produced at Weimar. A
serious opera in 5 acts entitled ' Samson,' for which
he himself wrote the libretto, has not yet been
performed in public. Two cantatas, ' Wachet auf '
and another written for the Festival in com
memoration of the battle of Leipzig, were his
first works for men's voices, and are popular with
the choral societies. His arrangement of Bach's
6 violin sonatas for PF. is a work of great merit.
Detailed analyses of the first six of these Sym
phonies will be found in the ' Monthly Musical
Record' for 1875, and from these a very good
idea of the composer's style may be gathered.
Remembering his struggles and hard life it is
only a matter for wonder that he should have
striven so earnestly and so long in a path that
was not his natural walk. A glance at the
nearly complete list of his works at the foot of
this notice will explain our meaning. The enor
mous mass of ' drawing-room music ' tells its own
tale. Raff had to live, and having by nature a
remarkable gift of melody and perhaps not much
artistic refinement, he wrote what would pay.
But on looking at his works in the higher branch
of music — his symphonies, concertos, and chamber
music — one cannot but be struck by the conscien
tious striving towards a very high ideal. In the
whole of his nine published Symphonies the slow
movements, without a single exception, are of
extreme melodic beauty, although weak from a
symphonic point of view : the first movements
are invariably worked out with surprising tech
nical skill, the subjects appearing frequently in
double counterpoint and in every kind of canon.
And however modern and common his themes
may appear, they have often been built up with
the greatest care, note by note, to this end;
showing that he does not, as is often said, put
down the first thing that comes into his mind.
RAFF.
Observe the following treatment of the first sub
ject in his ist Symphony 'An das Vaterland': —
RAFF.
65
ii
!§)
a
IE
„:.
trail
ite
etc.
to'
a canon in augmentation and double augmenta
tion. Such instances as this are numerous, and
the art with which these contrapuntal devices
are made to appear spontaneous is consummate.
In the Pianoforte Concerto in C minor (op. 185),
in each movement all the subjects are in double
counterpoint with one another, yet this is one of
Raff's freshest and most melodious works. To
return to the Symphonies: the Scherzos are, as
a rule, weak, and the Finales without exception
boisterous and indeed vulgar. Writing here, as
ever, for an uneducated public, Raff has for
gotten that for a symphony to descend from a
high tone is for it to be unworthy of the name.
A remarkable set of 30 Songs (Sanges-Friihling,
op. 98) deserves notice for its wealth of fine
melodies, some of which have become national
property ('Kein Sorg um den Weg'; ' Schon*
Else,' etc.) ; and among his pianoforte music is a
set of 20 Variations on an original theme (op. 1 79)
which displays an astonishing fertility of resource,
the theme — of an almost impossible rhythm of
5 and 7 quavers in the bar — being built up into
canons and scherzos of great variety and elegance.
Raff's Pianoforte Concerto is very popular,
and his Suite for Violin and Orchestra (op. 180)
only little less so. His versatility need not be
enlarged upon. In all the forms of musical com
position he has shown the same brilliant qualities
and the same regretable shortcomings. His gift
of melody, his technical skill, his inexhaustible
fertility, and above all his power of never repeat
ing himself — all these are beyond praise. But
his very fertility is a misfortune, since it renders
him careless in the choice of his subjects ; writing
•pot-boilers' has injured the development of a
delicate feeling for what is lofty and refined : in
short, he stands far before all second-rate com
posers, yet the conscientious critic hesitates to
allow him a place in the front rank of all.
Even those who have least sympathy with
VOL. III. PT. I.
Raffs views on art must admire the energy and
spirit with which he has worked his way upwards
in spite of every obstacle poverty could throw
in his way. He is a member of several societies,
and has received various orders. In 1877 he was
appointed with much e*clat director of the Hoch-
conservatoire at Frankfort, a post he still retains.
The first of his large works performed in this
country was probably the Lenore Symphony at
the Crystal Palace, Nov. 14, 1874. This was
followed by the (Im Walde,' and the PF. Concerto
in C minor (Jaell), at the Philharmonic ; the
Symphonies in G minor, 'Im Walde,' 'Fruhlings-
klange ' and 'Im Sommerzeit,' with the Concertos
for cello and violin, and the Suite for PF. and
orchestra, at the Crystal Palace. His Quintet
(op. 107), 2 Trios (op. 102, 112), Sonata (op. 128),
and other pieces, have been played at the Monday
Popular Concerts. [F.G.]
Catalogue of Raff's works.1
Op.l.
2.
8.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
Serenade. PP. solo. Andre.
Trois pieces caracterist-
iques. PF. solo. B. & H.2
Scherzo (0 minor). PF.solo.
B. &H.
Morceau de Salon . . . sur
'Maria de Kudenz.' PF.
solo. B. & H.
4 Galops. PF. solo. B.&H.
Morceau inst. Fantaisio et
Varns. PF. solo. B. & H.
Kondeau sur 'Io son ricco.'
PF. solo. B. & H.
12 Komances en form d'E-
tudes; en 2 Cahiers. PF.
solo. B. &, H.
Impromptu brillant. PF.
solo. B. & H.
Hommage au N6oromant-
isme, Grand Caprice. PF.
solo. B. tc H.
Air suisse, transcrit. PF.
solo. B. & H.
Morceau de Salon. Fant.
gracieuse. PF. solo. B. & H .
Valse. Eondino sur 'les
Huguenots.' PF. duet.
B. &H.
Sonata & Fugue (Eb minor).
PF. solo. B. & H.
6 Poemes. PF. solo. Schott.
Rondeau on Saloman's ' Dia-
mantkreuz.' PF.
Album Lyrique. PF. solo.
Schuberth (4 books con
taining 9 pieces).
Paraphrases (2). PF. solo.
Eck.
Fantaisie dramatique. PF.
solo. Litolff.
2 Morceaux de Salon. Sere
nade italienne ; Air Bhe-
nan. PF. solo. Litolff.
Eoreley, Dichtung ohne
Worte. PF. solo. Spina.
2 Bhapsodies ele'giaques.
PF. solo. Spina.
3 Pieces caracteristlques.
PF. solo. Kistner.
Valse me'lancolique. PF.
solo. Spina.
Eomance-e'tude. PF- solo.
Spina.
Den Manen Scarlattis.
Scherzo. PF. solo. Spina.
Angelens letzter Tag im
Kloster. Bin Cyclus etc. (12
pieces in 2 books). PF. solo.
Kistner.
6 Llederubertragen. PF.solo.
Ebner.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
Am Bhein, Bomanze.
solo. Spina.
PF.
Capriccietto (on motifs from
'Freischiitz'). PF. solo.
Schuberth.
Fantaisie Militaire (on mo
tifs from ' Huguenots ').
PF. solo. Schuberth.
Melange (on motifs from
' Sonnambula '). PF. solo.
Schuberth.
Grand Mazourka. PF. solo.
Stoll.
Nocturne (on romance by
Liszt). PF. solo. Kistner.
Capriccietto a la Boh^mi-
enne. PF. solo. Kistner.
Bomance. PF. solo. Kistner.
' LePretendant' . . deKtick-
en (3 Nos.). PF. solo.
Kistner.
Divertissement sur ' La
Juive.' PF.solo. Schubertli.
Fantasina sur ' Le Barbier
de Seville.' PF. solo. Schu
berth.
Sou veni r de ' Don Giovanni. '
PF. solo. Schuberth.
'La derniere Bose' — (The
last rose of summer). Im
promptu. PF. solo. Cranz.
S Lieder (by J . G.Fischer) for
Bar. or Alto and PF. Senff.
2 Lieder for Voice and PF.
Senff.
3 Lieder (by J. G. Fischer)
for Voice and PF. Hein-
richshofen.
2 Italienische Lieder (by
Sternau) for Voice and PF.
Heinrichshofen.
5 Lieder for Voice and PF.
Kistner.
3 Lieder for Voice and PF.
Schlesinger.
2 Lieder vom Ehein forVoice
and PF. Schloss.
Tanz-capricen (4). PF. solo.
Balm.
Friihlingsboten — 12 short
pieces for PF. solo. Schu
bert.
3 Salon Stilcke. PF. solo.
Bachmann.
' Aus der Schweiz.' Fantas-
tische Egloge. Bachmann.
2Nocturnes. PF. and Violin.
Schuberth.
Duo in A. PF. and Cello.
Nagel.
Schweizerweisen (9 Nos.).
PF. solo. Schuberth.
1 The Editor desires to express his obligations to Messrs. Augener ft
Co. for great assistance kindly rendered him in the difficult task of
drawing up this list. 2 B. & H.=Breitkopt & Hartel.
F
66
KAFF.
RAFF.
Op. 61. No. 1. Wagner's ' Lohen
grin,' Lyrische Fragments.
PF. solo.— No. 2. Do. 'Tann-
hauser,' Fantasie. PF. solo.
No. 3. Do. ' Fliegende Hol
lander,' Beminiscenzen.
PF. solo. — No. 4. Schu
mann's 'Genoveva.' PF.
solo. Schuherth.
62. Salon -Etuden from Wag
ner's operas. PF. solo.
Schlesinger. No. 1. An
dante from ' Fliegende
Hollander.' — No. 2. Sestet
from ' Tannhftuser.'— No.3.
Lohengrin's farewell.
63. Duos on motifs from Wag
ner's operas. PF. and V.
Siegel. No. 1. ' Fliegende
Hollander.'— No. 2. 'Tann-
hftuser.' — No. 3. 'Lohen
grin.'
64. Capricclo in F minor. PF.
solo. Leuckart.
65. No. 1. Fantaisie on motifs
from Berlioz's ' Benvenuto
Cellini.' PF. solo.— No. 2.
Caprice on motjfs from
Baff's 'Alfred.' PF. solo.
Schuberth.
66. ' Traum - KOnig und sein
Lieb' (Geibel). Voice and
PF. Schott.
67. 'La Feted' Amour 'Morceau
caracteristique pour Vio
lin de Concert avec PF.
Schott.
68. 5Transcriptions(Beethoven,
Gluck, Mozart, Schumann
Spohr). PF. solo. Peters
69. *uite. PF. solo. Korner.
70. 2 Paraphrases de Salon (Tro-
vatore, Traviata). PF. solo
Peters.
71. Suite in C. PF.solo. Kuhn
72. Suite in E minor. PF. solo
Kuhn.
73. 1st Grand Sonata. PF. and
V. (E minor). Schuberth.
74. 3 Clavier solos (Ballade
Scherzo, Metamorphosen)
PF. Schuberth.
75. Suite de(12) Morceaux pour
les petites mains. PF. solo
Kistner.
76. OdeauPrintemps. Morceau
de Concert. PF. and Orch
Schott.
77. Quatuor (No.l) in D minor
for Strings. Schuberth:
78. 2nd Grand Sonata for PF
and V. (in A). Schuberth
79. Cachoucha, Caprice. PF
solo. Peters.
80. 'Wachetauf (Geibel). Men';
voices, Solo Chorus, am
Orchestra. Schott.
81. No. 1. Sicilienne de 1'Opera
des 'Vepres Siciliennes.'—
No. 2. Tarantelle de ditto
PF.solo. Peters.
82. Suite de (12) Morceaux pou
les petites mains. PF
duets. Schuberth.
83. Mazourka-Caprice. PF.solo
Schott.
84. 'Chant de 1'Ondin,' Grand
Etude de 1'Arpeggio tremo
lando. PF. solo. Peters
85. 6 Morceaux. PF. and V
Kistner.
86. 2Fantaisiestucke, PF. an
Cello. B.B.1
87. Introduction and Allo scher
zoso. PF. solo. B. B.
88. ' Am Giessbach,' Etude. PF
solo. B. B.
89. Vilanella. PF. solo. B. B
90. Quartet, No. 2, in A, fo
Strings. Schuberth.
91. Suite in D. PF.solo. Peter
92. Capriccio in D minor. PF
solo. Peters.
93. 'Dans la nacelle,' Beverie-
Barcarolle.PF.solo. Peter
94. Impromptu Valse. PF. solo
Peters.
95. 'La Polka de la Eeine,'
Caprice. PF.solo. Peters.
96. ' An das Vaterland.' Prize
Symphony (No. 1). Schu
bert.
97. 10 Lieder for Male Voices.
Kahnt.
98. ' Sanges-Fruhling.' 30 Eo-
manzen, Lieder, Balladen,
and GesSnge, for Sopr. and
PF. Schuberth.
99. 3 Sonatilles (A minor ; G ;
C). PF. solo. Schuberth.
100. ' Deutschlands Auferste-
hung.' Fest Cantate on the
50th anniversary of the
Battle of Leipzig, for Male
Voices and Orch. Kahnt.
101. Suite for Orchestra. Schott.
102. 1st Grand Trio, for PF., V.
and Cello. Schuberth.
103. Jubilee Overture, for Or
chestra. Kahnt.
104. 'Le Galop,' Caprice. PF.
solo. Peters.
105. 5Eglogues. PF.solo. Peters.
106. Fantaisie - Polonaise. PF.
solo. Peters.
107. Grand Quintuor (A minor).
PF., 2 W. Viola and Cello.
Schuberth.
108. Saltarello. PF. solo. B. B.
109. Be'verie-Nocturne. PF. solo.
B.B.
110. 'La Gitana,' Danse Espagn.
Caprice. PF. solo. B. B.
111. Boleros and Valse, 2 Ca
prices. PF. solo. Schu
berth.
112. 2nd Grand Trio (in G). PF.
V. and Cello. B. B.
113. Ungarische Bhapsodie. PF.
solo. Forberg.
114. 12 Songs for 2 Voices and
PF. Forberg.
115. 2 Morceaux lyriques. PF.
solo. Forberg.
116. Valse Caprice. PF. solo.
Forberg.
117. Festival Overture (In A), for
Orchestra. Kistner.
118. Valse favorite. PF. solo.
Kistner.
119. Fantasie. PF. solo. Kistner.
120.
121. Illustrations de ' L'Afri-
caine' (4 Nos.). PF. sol
B.B. 2
122. 10 Songs for Men's Voices.
Kahnt.
123. Concert - Overture (in F).
Siegel.
124. Festival-Overture on 4 fa
vourite Student-songs, for
the 50th anniversary of
the ' Deutschen Burschen-
schaft.' PF. 4 hands. Prae-
ger.
125. Gavotte; Berceuse; Espiegle;
Valse. PF. solo. Siegel.
126. 3 Clavierstiicke— Menuet,
Bomance, Capriccietto.PF.
solo. Praeger.
127. 'Ein' feste Burg,' overture
to a drama on the 30-years'
war. Orchestra. Hofmeis-
ter.
128. 3rd Grand Sonata. PF. and
V. (in D). Schuberth.
129. 4th Grand Sonata. PF. and
V. ' Ohrom. Sonate in «i-
nem Satze.' (G minor).
Schuberth.
130. 2 Etudes miSlodiques. PF.
solo. Schuberth.
131. Styrienne. PF. solo. Hof-
meister.
132. Marche brillante. PF. solo.
Hofmeister.
133. Ele"gie. PF. solo. Hofmeis
ter.
134. 'Vom Bhein,' 6 Fantasie-
stiicke. PF. solo. Kistner.
135. 'Blatter und Bliithen,' 12
pieces for PF.solo. Kahnt.
136. 3rd String quartet (E minor)
Schuberth.
*
E. B.=Bieter-Biedennann & Co.
B. B.=Bote & Bock.
137. 4th String quartet (A
minor). Schuberth.
138. 5th String quartet (G).
Schuberth.
139. Festmarsch. PF. solo.
Schott.
140. 2nd Symphony (In C) for
Orchestra. Schott.
141. Psalm 130 (' De Profundis ')
8 voices and Orch. Schu
berth.
142. Fantaisie (Fjf). PF. solo.
Kistner.
143. Barcarolle (Eb). PF. solo.
Kistner.
144. Tarantella (C). PF. solo.
Kistner.
145. 5thGrand Sonata. PF.andV.
(C minor). Schuberth.
146. Capriccio (Bb minor). PF.
solo. B.B.
147. 2 Meditations. PF. solo.
B.B.
148. Scherzo in Eb. PF. solo.
E.B.
149. 2 Elegies for PF. solo. B. B.
150. Chaconne ( A minor). 2PFs.
B.B.
151. Allegro agitato. PF. solo.
B.B.
152. 2 Bomances. PF. solo. B.B.
153. 3rd Symphony. 'Im Walde'
(F). Orchestra. Kistner
154. 'Dame Kobold,' Comic
opera. B. B.
155. 3rd Grand Trio. PF. V. and
Cello. B.B.
156. Valse brillante (Eb). PF.
solo. Bies.
157. Cavatine (Ab) and Etude
'La Fileuse.' PF. solo.
Seitz.
158. 4th Grand Trio (D). PF
V. and Cello. Seitz.
159. 1st Humoreske (D) in Waltz
form. PF. duet. B.B.
160. Beisebilder (10 Nos.). PF
duet. Siegel.
161. Concerto for Violin & Orch
(B minor). Siegel.
162. Suite in G minor. PF. solo
Challier.
163. Suite in G major. PF. solo
Seitz.
164. Sicilienne, Bomanze, Tar
antelle. PF. solo. B. B.
165. 'La Cicerenella, Nouveau
Carnaval.' PF.solo. Siegel
166. Idylle; Valse champetre
PF. solo. Seitz.
167. 4th Symphony (G minor)
Orchestra. Schuberth.
168. Fantaisie-Sonate (D minor)
PF. solo. Siegel.
169. Eomanze ; Valse brillante
PF. solo. Siegel.
170. La Polka glissante, Caprice
PF. solo. Siegel.
171. 'Im Kahn' and ' Der Tanz
2 songs for Mixed Choi
and Orchestra. Siegel.
172. 'Maria Stuart, ein Cyclu
von Gesangen' for Voic
and PF. (11 Nos.) Siegel
173. 8 Gesange for Voice & PF
Seitz.
174. ' Aus dem Tanzsalon, Phan
tasie Stiicke ' (12 Nos.). PF
4 hands. Seitz.
175. 'Orientales,' 8 Morceaux
PF. solo. Forberg.
176. Octet for strings (C). Seitz
177. 5th Symphony 'Lenore
Orch. Seitz.
178. Sestet. 2 VV., 2 Violas,
Cellos. Seitz.
179. Variations on an origina
theme. PF. solo. Seitz.
180. Suite for Solo V. and Orch
Siegel.
181. 2nd Humoreske in Walt
form, ' Todtentanz (Dans
macabre).' PF.duet. Siege
182. 2 Bomances for Horn (o
Cello) and PF. Siegel.
183. Sonata for PF. and Cellc
Siegel.
184. Six songs for 3 women
voices and PF. Siegel.
185. Concerto. PF. and Orch. (C
minor). Siegel.
186a. Morgenlied.for mixed choir
and Orch. Siegel.
1866. Einer entschlai'enen. So
prano solo, Chor. and Orch.
Siegel.
187. Erinnerung an Venedig (6
Nos.). PF. solo. Siegel.
188.
189. 6th Symphony (D minor)
' Gelebt, gestrebt, gelitten,
gestritten, gestorben, um-
worben.' Orch. B.B.
190. Feux follets, Caprice-etude.
PF. solo. Siegel.
191.
192. 3 String Quartets. No. 6. (C
minor) Suite alterer Form.
—No. 7. (D) Die schong
Mullerin.— No. 8. (C) Suits
in Canon-form. Kahnt.
193. Concerto (D minor). Cello
and Orch. Siegel.
194. 2nd Suite in Ungarischer
Weise (F). Orch. Bahn.
195. 10 GesSnge for men's voices.
Kahnt.
196. Etude ' am Schilf ' ; Ber
ceuse ; Novelette ; Im
promptu. PF. solo. Seitz.
197. Capriccio (Db). PF. solo.
Seitz.
198. 10 Gesange for mixed choir.
Seitz.
199. 2 Scenes for Solo Voice and
Orch. ' jager-braut ' and
' Die Hirtin.' Siegel.
200. Suite in Eb for PF. and
Orch. Siegel.
201. 7th Symphony, 'In the Alps'
(Bb). Orch. Seitz.
202. 2 Quartets for PF. V. Va.
and Cello (G). Siegel.
203. 'Volker.'cyclischeTondich-
tung (9 Nos.). V. and PF.
Siegel.
204. Suite (Bb). Orch. Challier.
205. 8th Symphony 'Fruhlings-
kiange'(A). Orch. Siegel.
206. 2nd Concerto for V. and
Orch. (A minor). Siegel.
207a. Phantasie (G minor). 2PF«.
Siegel.
2076. The same arranged for PF.
and Strings. Siegel.
208. 9th Symphony (E minor).
'ImSommer.' Orch. Sie-
gel.
209.
210.
211. 'Blondel de Nesle,' Cyclus
von GesSngen, Barit. &PF.
B. &H.
212. 10th Symphony. 'Zur
Herbstzeit.'
Works without Opus-number.
Valse-rondino on motifs from
Saloman's ' Diamantkreuz.'
Schuberth.
Beminiscences of the 'Meister-
singer ' (4 Pts.). Schott.
Valse-impromptu a la Tyrol-
ienne. Schott.
Abendlied by Schumann. Con
cert-paraphrase. Schuberth.
Berceuse on an Idea of Gounod's.
Siegel.
Improvisation on Damrosch's
Lied 'Der Lindenzweig.' Lich-
tenberg.
Valse de Juliette (Gounod).
Siegel.
4 Capriccios on Wallachian (2)
and Servian (2) themes. Siegel.
Introduction and Fugue for Or
gan (E minor). B. B.
Baff-Album— containing Op.156;
157, Nos. 1, 2 : 166, No. 2 ; 196,
Nos. 1—1 ; 197. Seitz.
Oper im Salon— containing Op.
35-37, 43—15, 61, 65. Schu
berth.
Fruhlings-Lied. Mez. Sop. and
PF. Schott.
Standchen for Voice and PF.
Cotta.
RAIMONDI.
EAIMONDI, PIETRO, an Italian composer,
Maestro di Capella at St. Peter's, who is charac
terised by Fe"tis as possessing an extraordinary
genius for musical combination. He was born
at Rome of poor parents, Dec. 20, 1786. At
an early age he passed six years in the Con-
servatorio of the Pietk de' Turchini at Naples,
and after many wanderings, mostly on foot —
from Naples to Rome, from Rome to Florence,
from Florence to Genoa — and many years, he at
length found an opportunity of coming before
the public with an opera entitled ' Le Bizarrie
d'Amore,' which was performed at Genoa in 1807.
After three years there, each producing its opera,
he passed a twelvemonth at Florence, and brought
out two more. The next 25 years were spent
between Rome* Milan, Naples, and Sicily, and
each year had its full complement of operas
and ballets. In 1824 he became director of the
royal theatres at Naples, a position which he
retained till 1832. In that year the brilliant
success of his opera buffa ' II Ventaglio ' (Na
ples, 1831) procured him the post of Professor of
Composition in the Conservatorio at Palermo.
Here he was much esteemed, and trained several
promising pupils. In March 1850 he was called
upon to succeed Basil! as Maestro di Capella
at St. Peter's ; a post for which, if knowledge,
experience, and ceaseless labour of production
in all departments of his art could qualify him,
he was amply fitted. Shortly before this, in 1848,
he had after four years of toil completed three
oratorios, 'Potiphar,' 'Pharaoh,' and 'Jacob,'
which were not only designed to be performed in
the usual manner, but to be played all three in
combination as one work, under the name of
'Joseph.' On Aug. 7, 1852, the new Maestro
brought out this stupendous work at the Teatro
Argentini. The success of the three single oratorios
was moderate, but when they were united — the
three orchestras and the three troupes forming an
ensemble of nearly 400 musicians, the excitement
and applause of the spectators knewno bounds, and
so great was his emotion that Raimondi fainted
away. He did not long survive this triumph,
but died at Rome Oct. 30, 1853.
The list of his works is astonishing, and all the
more so when we recollect that Raimondi's exist
ence was all but unknown on this side of the
Alps. It embraces 55 operas ; 21 grand ballets,
composed for San Carlo between 1812 and 1828 ;
7 oratorios ; 4 masses with full orchestra ; 2 ditto
with 2 choirs h. capella; 2 requiems with full
orchestra; i ditto for 8 and 16 voices; a Credo
for 1 6 voices; the whole Book of Psalms, a la
Palestrina, for 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 voices ; many Te
Deums, Stabats, Misereres, Tantum ergos, psalms
and litanies ; two books of 90 partimenti, each
on a separate bass, with three different accom
paniments ; a collection of figured basses with
fugued accompaniments as a school of accom
paniment ; 4 fugues for 4 voices, each indepen
dent but capable of being united and sung
together ; 6 fugues for 4 voices capable of com
bination into I fugue for 24 voices ; a fugue for
1 6 choirs j 16 fugues for 4 voices; 24 fugues for
RALLENTANDO.
67
4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 voices, of which 4 and 5 separate
fugues will combine into one. Besides the above
feat with the 3 oratorios he composed an opera
seria and an opera buffa which went equally well
separately and in combination. Such stupendous
labours are, as M. Fe"tis well remarks, enough to
give the reader the headache : what must they
have done to the persevering artist who accom
plished them ? But they also give one the heart
ache at the thought of their utter futility.
Raimondi's compositions, with all their ingenuity,
belong to a past age, and we may safely say that
they will never be revived. His operas especially
belong to the prae-Rossinian epoch, and it would
have been good for them if they had never been
made. [G. ]
RAINFORTH, ELIZABETH, bora Nov. 23,
1814, studied singing under George Perry and
T. Cooke, and acting under Mrs. Davison, the
eminent comedian. After having fledged her
wings at minor concerts, she appeared upon the
stage at the St. James's Theatre, Oct. 27, 1836,
as Mandane, in Arne's ' Artaxerxes,' with com
plete success. She performed there for the re
mainder of the season, and then removed to the
English Opera House. Subsequently to her public
appearance she took lessons from Crivelli. In
1837 she sang in oratorio at the Sacred Harmonic
Society, and continued to do so for several years.
She made the first of many appearances at the
Philharmonic, March 18, 1839. In 1840 she was
introduced at the Concert of Ancient Music, and
in 1843 sang at the Birmingham Festival. After
performing at Covent Garden from 1838 to 1843
she transferred her services to Drury Lane, where
she made a great hit by her performance of
Arline, in Balfe's ' Bohemian Girl,' on its pro
duction, Nov. 27, 1843. In 1844 she had a most
successful season in Dublin. She was engaged as
prima donna at the Worcester Festival of 1845.
She continued to perform in the metropolis until
about 1852, when she removed to Edinburgh,
where she remained until about 1856. She then
quitted public life, and in 1858 went to reside
at Old Windsor, under the wing of her friend
Miss Thackeray, and taught music in Windsor and
its neighbourhood until her complete retirement
in March 1871, when she removed to her father's
at Bristol. Her voice was a high soprano, even
and sweet in quality, but deficient in power, and
she possessed great judgment and much dramatic
feeling. Although her limited power prevented
her from becoming a great singer, her attain
ments were such as enabled her to fill the first
place with credit to herself, and satisfaction to
her auditors. She died at Redland, Bristol,
Sept. 22, 1877. [W.H.H.]
RALLENTANDO, RITARDANDO, RI-
TENENTE, RITENUTO — ' Becoming slow
again,' 'Slackening,' 'Holding back,' 'Held back.'
The first two of these words are used quite in
differently to express a gradual diminution of the
rate of speed in a composition, and although the
last is commonly used in exactly the same way,
it seems originallv and in a strict sense to have
F2
63
RALLENTANDO.
meant a uniform rate of slower time, so that the
whole passage marked ritenuto would be taken at
the same time, while each bar and each phrase in
a passage marked rallentando would be a little
slower than the one before it. That there exists
a difference in their uses is conclusively proved
by a passage in the Quartet op. 131 of Beethoven,
where in the 7th movement (allegro) a phrase of
three recurring minims, which is repeated in all
five times, has the direction ' Espressivo, poco ri
tenuto ' for its first three appearances, which are
separated by two bars a tempo, and for the last
two times has ritardando, which at length leads
into the real a tempo, of which the former separ
ating fragments were but a presage. This is one
of the very rare instances of the use of the word
ritenuto by Beethoven. The conclusion from it
is confirmed by a passage in Chopin's Rondo,
op. 16, consisting of the four bars which im
mediately precede the entry of the second subject.
Here the first two bars consist of a fragment
of a preceding figure which is repeated, so that
both these bars are exactly the same ; the last
two bars however have a little chromatic cadence
leading into the second subject. The direction
over the first two bars is 'poco ritenuto' and over
the last two 'rallentando,' by which we may be
quite sure that the composer intended the repeated
fragment to be played at the same speed in each
bar, and the chromatic cadence to be slackened
gradually.
Ritenente is used by Beethoven in the PF.
Sonata, op. no, about the middle of the first
movement, and again in the Sonata, op. in,
in the first movement, in the seventh and fif
teenth bars from the beginning of the Allegro
con brio. It would seem that the same effect
is intended as if ' ritenuto ' were employed ; in
each case, the words 'meno mosso' might have
been used. Beethoven prefers Ritardando to
Rallentando, which latter is common only in his
earlier works. [J.A.F.M.]
RAMANN, LINA, musical litterateur and
educationist, was born at Mainstockheim, near
Kitzingen, in Bavaria, June 24, 1833. Her turn
for music and her determination to succeed were
evident from a very early age. It was not, how
ever, till her seventeenth year that she had any
instruction in music. At that time her parents
removed to Leipzig, and from 1850 to 1853 she
there enjoyed the advantage of pianoforte lessons
from the wife of Dr. F. Brendel, herself formerly
a scholar of Field's. From this period she adopted
the career of a teacher of music, and studied
assiduously, though without help, for that end.
In 1858 she opened an institute in Gluckstadt
(Holstein) for the special training of rnusic-
mistresses, and maintained it till 1865, in which
year she founded a more important establish
ment, the Music School at Niirnberg, in con
junction with Frau Ida Volkmann of Tilsit, and
assisted by a staff of superior teachers, under
MissRamann's own superintendence. With a view
to the special object of her life she has published
two works — ' Die Musik als Gegenstand der
Erziehung' (Leipzig, Merseburger, 1868), and
RAMEATJ.
'Allgemeine Erzieh- und Unterrichts-lehre der
Jugend' (Leipzig, H. Schmidt, 1869; 2nd ed.
1873), which were both received with favour by
the German Press. Since 1860 Miss Ramann
has been musical correspondent of the Hamburg
' Jahreszeiten.' A volume of her essays con
tributed to that paper has been collected and
published, under the title of ' Aus der Gegenwart'
(Niirnberg, Schmid, 1868). In the early part of
1880 she published a study of Liszt's 'Christus'
(Leipzig, Kahnt), and later in the year the first
volume of a Life of Liszt (1811-1840; Leipzig,
Breitkopf & Hartel). This is an important work.
It suffers somewhat from over- enthusiasm, but it
is done with great care, minuteness, and intelli
gence, and has obviously profited largely by direct
information from Liszt himself. Her cousin,
BRUNO RAMANN, was born about 1830 at Er
furt, and was brought up to commerce, but his
desire and talent for music were so strong, that
in 1857 or 58 he succeeded in getting rid of his
business and put himself under Dr. F. Brendel
and Riedel, for regular instruction. He then for
five years studied under Hauptmann at Leipzig,
and is now a resident teacher and composer at
Dresden. His works have reached beyond op. 50,
but they consist almost entirely of songs for one
or more voices, and of small and apparently senti
mental pieces for the pianoforte. He does not appear
yet to have attempted any large composition. [G.]
RAME AU, JEAN PHILIPPE, eminent composer,
and writer on the theory of music, born at Dijon,
Sept. 25, 1683, in the house now No. 5 Rue St.
Michel. His father,1 Jean, was a musician,
and organist of Dijon cathedral, in easy circum
stances. He intended Jean Philippe, the eldest
of his three sons, to be a magistrate, but
his strong vocation for music and obstinacy of
character frustrated these views. According to
his biographers he played the clavecin at seven,
and read at sight any piece of music put before
him : music indeed absorbed him to such an
extent when at the Jesuit College that he neg
lected his classical studies, and was altogether
so refractory that his parents were requested to
remove him. Henceforth he never opened a
book, unless it were a musical treatise. He
quickly mastered the clavecin, and studied the
organ and violin with success, but there was no
master in Dijon capable of teaching him to write
music, and he was left to discover for himself
the laws of harmony and composition.
At the age of 1 7 he fell in love with a young
widow in the neighbourhood, who indirectly did
him good service, since the shame which he felt
at the bad spelling of his letters drove him to write
correctly. To break off this acquaintance his
father sent him, in 1701, to Italy, where how
ever he did not remain long, a mistake which,
in after life, he regretted. He liked Milan, and
indeed the attractions of so great a centre of
music must have been great ; but for some un
known reason he soon left with a theatrical
manager whom he accompanied as first violin
to Marseilles, Lyons, Nimes, Montpellier, and
i His mother's name was Claudine Demartindcourt.
RAMEAU.
other places in the south of France. How long
the tour lasted it is impossible to ascertain, as
no letters belonging to this period are to be
found. From his ' Premier Livre de pieces de
clavecin' (Paris, 1706) we learn that he was
then living in Paris, at a wig-maker's in the
Vieille Rue du Temple, as Haydn did at Keller's,
though without the disastrous results which fol
lowed that connexion. Meantime he was organist
of the Jesuit convent in the Rue St. Jacques, and
of the chapel of the Peres de la Merci. No
particulars, however, of the length of his stay
in Paris are known, nor how he occupied the
interval between this first visit and his return
about 1717- In that year a competition took
place for the post of organist of the church of
St. Paul, and Rameau was among the candidates.
Marchand, then at the head of the organists in
Paris, was naturally one of the examiners ; and
either from fear of being outshone by one whom he
had formerly patronised, or for some other reason,
he used his whole influence in favour of Daquin,
who obtained the post. Mortified at the unjust
preference thus shown to a man in all points his
inferior, Rameau again left Paris for Lille, and
became for a short time organist of St. Etienne.
Thence he went to Clermont in Auvergne, where
his brother Claude * resigned the post of organist
of the cathedral in his favour. In this secluded
mountain town, with a harsh climate predis
posing to indoor life, he had plenty of time for
thought and study. The defects of his education
drove him to find out everything for himself.
From the works of Descartes, Mersenne, Zarlino,
and Kircher he gained some general knowledge
of the science of sound, and taking the equal
division of the monochord as the starting-point
of his system of harmony, soon conceived the
possibility of placing the theory of music on a
sound basis. Henceforth he devoted all his
energies to drawing up his 'Treatise on Harmony
reduced to its natural principles,' and as soon
as that important work was finished he deter
mined to go to Paris and publish it. His en
gagement with the chapter of Clermont had
however several years to run, and there was
great opposition to his leaving, owing to the
popularity of his improvisations on the organ,
in which, contrary to the usual course, his
theoretical studies, instead of hampering his
ideas, seemed to give them greater freshness and
fertility.
Once free he started immediately for Paris,
and brought out his 'Traits' de 1'Harmonie'
(Ballard, 1722, 4to, 432 pp.).2 The work did not
at first attract much attention among French
musicians, and yet, as Fe'tis observes, it laid
the foundation for a philosophical science of
1 Claude Rameau, a man of indomitable will and capricious temper,
and a clever organist, lived successively at Dijon, Lyons, Marseilles,
Clermont, Orleans, Strassburg, and Autun. His son Jean Francois, a
gifted musician, but a dissipated man, is admirably portrayed by
Diderot in his ' Neveu de Rameau.' He published in 1766 a poem in 5
cantos called 'LeRame"ide,' followed in the same year by 'La nouvelle
Rame"ide,' a parody by his schoolfellow Jacques Cazotte. He is
mentioned by Mercier in his 'Tableau de Paris.'
2 The Third Part of this was translated into English 15 years later
with the title 'A Treatise of Music, containing the Principles of
Composition.' London, no date, 8vo, 180 pp.
RAMEAU.
69
harmony. Rameau's style is prolix and obscure,
often calculated rather to repel than attract the
reader, and the very boldness and novelty of
his theories excited surprise and provoked criti
cism. His discovery of the law of inversion in
chords was a stroke of genius, and led to very
important results, although in founding his
system of harmony on the sounds of the common
chord, with the addition of thirds above or
thirds below, he put both himself and others
on a wrong track. In the application of his
principle to all the chords he found himself
compelled to give up all idea of tonality, since,
on the principles of tonality he could not make
the thirds for the discords fall on the notes
that his system required. Fe'tis justly accuses
him of having abandoned the tonal successions
and resolutions prescribed in the old treatises
on harmony, accompaniment, and composition,
and the rules for connecting the chords based on
the ear, for a fixed order of generation, attractive
from its apparent regularity, but with the serious
inconvenience of leaving each chord disconnected
from the rest.
Having rejected the received rules for the
succession and resolution of chords which were
contrary to his system, Rameau perceived the
necessity of formulating new ones, and drew
up a method for composing a fundamental bass
for every species of music. The principles he
laid down for forming a bass different from the
real bass of the music, and for verifying the
right use of the chords, are arbitrary, insufficient
in a large number of cases, and, as regards many
of the successions, contrary to the judgment of the
ear. Finally, he did not perceive that by using
the chord of the 6-5-3 ^>oth as a fundamental
chord and an inversion he destroyed his whole
system, as in the former case it is impossible to
derive it from the third above or below.3 After
more study, however, particularly on the subject
of harmonics, Rameau gave up many of his earlier
notions, and corrected some of his most essential
mistakes. The development and modification of
his ideas may be seen by consulting his works,
of which the following is a list: — 'Nouveau
systems de musique theorique . . . pour servir
d'Introduction au traits' d'Harmonie' (1726,
4to) ; ' Ge'ne'ration harmonique' etc. (1713, 8vo) ;
' Demonstration du principe de 1'harmonie ' ( 1 750,
8vo) ; ' Nouvelles reflexions sur la demonstration
du principe de 1'harmonie' (1752, 8vo) ; 'Ex-
trait d'une re'ponse de M. Rameau k M. Euler
sur I'identite' des octaves/ etc. (1753, 8vo) — all
published in Paris. To these specific works, all
dealing with the science of harmony, should be
added the 'Dissertation sur les differentes me'-
thodes d'accompagnement pour le clavecin ou
pour 1'orgue' (Paris, Boivin, 1732, 4to), and
some articles which appeared in the 'Mercure
de France,' and in the ' Memoir es de Trevoux.'
The mere titles of these works are a proof of
the research and invention which Rameau brought
to bear on the theory of music ; but what was
3 FfHis has explained, detailed, and refuted Rameau's system in his
'Esquisse de 1'Histoire de 1'Harmonie,' which has been used by the
writer, and to which he refers his readeis.
70
RAMEAU.
most remarkable in his case is that he succeeded
in lines which are generally opposed to each
other, and throughout life occupied the first
rank not only as a theorist, but as a player and
composer. Just when his ' Traitd de 1'Har-
inonie' was beginning to attract attention he
arranged to make music for the little pieces
which his fellow-countryman, Alexis Piron, was
writing for the Theatre de la Foire, and ac
cordingly, on Feb. 3, 1723, they produced 'L'En-
driague,' in 3 acts, with dances, divertissements,
and grand airs, as stated in the title. In Jan.
1724 he obtained the privilege of publishing
his cantatas, and various instrumental com
positions, amongst others his ' Pieces de clavecin,
avec une Me"thode pour la me"canique des doigts,'
etc., republished as 'Pieces de Clavecin, avec
une table pour les agrdments'1 (Paris, 1731 and
1736, oblong folio).
As the favourite music-master among ladies
of rank, and organist of the church of Ste. Croix
de la Bretonnerie, Rameau's position and pro
spects now warranted his taking a wife, and on
Feb. 25, 1726, he was united to Marie Louise
Mangot, a good musician with a pretty voice.
The disparity of their ages was considerable, the
bride being only 1 8, but her loving and gentle
disposition made the marriage a very happy one.
A few days later, on Feb. 29, Rameau pro
duced at the Theatre de la Foire a i-act piece
called L'Enr6lement d'Arlequin,' followed in
the autumn by 'Le faux Prodigue,' 2 acts, both
written by Piron. Such small comic pieces as
these were obviously composed, by a man of his
age and attainments (he was -now 42), solely with
the view of gaining access to a stage of higher
rank, but there was no hope of admission to
the theatre of the Academic without a good
libretto, and this it was as difficult for a be
ginner to obtain then as it is now. There is a
remarkable letter still extant from Rameau to
Houdar de Lamotte, dated Oct. 1727, asking
him for a lyric tragedy, and assuring him that
he was no novice, but one who had mastered
the ' art of concealing his art.' The blind poet
refused his request, but aid came from another
quarter. La Popeliniere, the fermier gtntral,
musician, poet, and artist, whose houses in Paris
and at Passy were frequented by the most
celebrated artists French and foreign, had chosen
Rameau as his clavecinist and conductor of the
music at his fetes, and before long placed at his
disposal the organ in his chapel, his orchestra,
and his theatre. He did more, for through his
influence Rameau obtained from Voltaire the
lyric tragedy of 'Samson,' which he promptly
set to music, though the performance was pro
hibited on the eve of its representation at the
Academie — an exceptional stroke of ill-fortune.
At last the Abb£ Pellegrin agreed to furnish
him with an opera in 5 acts, 'Hippolyte et
Aricie,' founded on Racine's 'Phedre.' He
compelled Rameau to sign a bill for 500 livres
as security in case the opera failed, but showed
1 Both Fetis and Pougin have fallen into the mistake of considering
this a separate work.
EAMEAU.
more sagacity and more heart than might have
been expected from one
Qut dlnait de 1'antel et soupait d^
Le matin catholique et le soir idolatre,2 —
for he was so delighted with the music on its
first performance at La Popeliniere's, that he
tore up the bill at the end of the first act. The
world in general was less enthusiastic, and after
having overcome the ill-will or stupidity of the
performers, Rameau had to encounter the astonish
ment of the crowd, the prejudices of routine, and
the jealousy of his brother artists. Campra alone
recognised his genius, and it is to his honour
that when questioned by the Prince de Conti on
the subject, he replied, ' There is stuff enough in
Hippolyte et Aricie for ten operas ; this man
will eclipse us all.'
The opera was produced at the Academic
on Oct. i, 1733. Rameau was then turned 50
years of age, and the outcry with which his
work was greeted suggested to him that he had
possibly mistaken his career ; for a time he con
templated retiring from the theatre, but was
reassured by seeing his hearers gradually accus
toming themselves to the novelties which at first
shocked them. The success of 'Les Indes galantes'
(Aug. 23, 1735), of 'Castor et Pollux,' his master
piece (Oct. 24, 1737), and of 'Les Fetes d'He"be"
(May 21, 1739), however, neither disarmed his
critics, nor prevented Rousseau from making him
self the mouthpiece of those who cried up Lully at
the expense of the new composer. But Rameau
was too well aware of the cost of success to be
hurt by epigrams, especially when he found that
he could count both on the applause of the
multitude, and the genuine appreciation of the
more enlightened.
His industry was immense, as the following
list of his operas and ballets produced at the
Acade"mie in 20 years will show : —
Dardanus. 5 acts and prologue
(Nov. 19, 1739).
Les Ffrtes de Polymnie, 3 acts
and prologue (Oct. 12, 1745).
Le Temple de la Gloire, F£te,
in 3 acts and prologue (Dec. 7,
1745).
Za'is, 4 acts and prologue (Feb.
29, 1748).
Pygmalion, 1 act (Aug. 27, 1748).
Les F£tes de 1'Hymen et de
1'Amour, 3 acts and prologue (Nov.
6. 1748).
Plate"e, 3 acts and prologue (Feb.
4, 1749).
Na'is, 3 acts and prologue (April
22, 1749).
Zoroastre, 5 acts (Dec. 5, 1749).
La Guirlande, ou les Fleurs en-
chanties, 1 act (Sept. 21, 1751).
Acanthe et Ce~phise, 3 acts (Nov.
18, 1751).
Les Surprises de 1'Amour, 3 acts
(May 31, 1757).
Les Paladins. 3 acts (Feb. 12,
1760).
Besides these, Rameau found time to write di
vertissements for 'Les Courses de TempeY a
Pastoral (Theatre Fran£ais, Aug. 1734), and 'La
Rose' (Theatre de la Foire, March, 1744), botl1
by Piron. From 1 740 to 1 745 the director of the
Opera gave him no employment, and in this
interval he published his 'Nouvelles Suites de
Pieces de clavecin ' and his ' Pieces de clavecin en
concerts avec un violon ou une flute' (1741), re
markable compositions which have been reprinted
by Mme. Farrenc (' Le Tre"sor des Pianistes') and
M. Poisot. He also accepted the post of conductor
of the Ope'ra-Comique, of which Monnefc3 was
2 Who dined at the altar and supped at the theatre ; Catholic in
the morning, and Idolater at night.
3 See Monnet's 'Supplement au Koman comique,' 51. This fact
seems to have escaped all Rameau's biographers.
EAMEAU.
manager, probably in the hope of attracting
public attention, and forcing the management of
the Acade'mie to alter their treatment of him.
Finally he composed for the Court 'Lysis et
Delie,' 'Daphnis et EgleY 'Les Sybarites ' (Oct.
and Nov. 1753); 'La Naissance d'Osiris,' and
'Anacreon' (Oct. 1754), all given at Fontaine-
bleau. Some years previously, on the occasion
of the marriage of the Dauphin with the Infanta,
he had composed ' La Princesse de Navarre '
to a libretto of Voltaire's (3 acts and prologue,
performed with great splendour at Versailles,
Feb. 23, 1745). This was the most successful
of all his operas de circonstance, and the authors
adapted from it ' Les Fetes de Ramire ' a i-act
opera-ballet, also performed at Versailles (Dec.
22, 1745).
In estimating Rameau 's merits we cannot in
justice compare him with the great Italian and
German masters of the day, whose names and
works were then equally unknown in France ;
we must measure him with contemporary French
composers for the stage. These writers had
no idea of art beyond attempting a servile copy
of Lully, with overtures, recitatives, vocal pieces,
and ballet airs, all cast in one stereotyped form.
Rameau made use of such a variety of means as
not only attracted the attention of his hearers, but
retained it. For the placid and monotonous har
monies of the day, the trite modulation, insignifi
cant accompaniments, and stereotyped ritornelles,
he substituted new forms, varied and piquant
rhythms, ingenious harmonies, bold modulations,
and a richer and more effective orchestration. He
even ventured on enharmonic changes, and instead
of the time-honoured accompaniments with the
strings in 5 parts, and flutes and oboes in 2, and
with tuttis in which the wind simply doubled the
strings, he gave each instrument a distinct part
of its own, and thus imparted life and colour to
the whole. Without interrupting the other
instruments, he introduced interesting and un
expected passages on the flutes, oboes, and
bassoons, and thus opened a path which has
been followed up with ever-increasing success.
He also gave importance to the orchestral pieces,
introducing his operas with a well-constructed
overture, instead of the meagre introduction of
the period, in which the same phrases were re
peated ad nauseam. Nor did he neglect the
chorus; he developed it, added greatly to its musi
cal interest, and introduced the syllabic style with
considerable effect. Lastly, his ballet-music
was so new in its rhythms, and so fresh and
pleasing in melody, that it was at once adopted
and copied in the theatres of Italy and Germany.
We have said enough to prove that Rameau
was a composer of real invention and originality.
His declamation was not always so just as that
of Lully ; his airs have not the same grace,
and are occasionally marred by eccentricity and
harshness, and disfigured by roulades in doubtful
taste; but when inspired by his subject Rameau
found appropriate expression for all sentiments,
whether simple or pathetic, passionate, dramatic,
or heroic. His best operas contain beauties
RAMEAU.
71
which defy the caprices of fashion, and will
command the respect of true artists for all time.
But if his music was so good, how is it that it
never attained the same popularity as that of
Lully ? In the first place, he took the wrong line
on a most important point ; and in the second, he
was less favoured by circumstances than his
predecessor. It was his doctrine, that for a
musician of genius all subjects are equally good,
and hence he contented himself with uninteresting
fables written in wretched style, instead of taking
pains, as Lully did, to secure pieces constructed
with skill and well versified. He used to say
that he could set the 'Gazette de Hollande' to
music. Thus he damaged his own fame, for a
French audience will not listen even to good music
unless it is founded on an interesting drama. His
ballet-music, too, often only serves to retard the
action of the piece and destroy its dramatic
interest.
Much as Rameau would have gained by the
cooperation of another Quinault, instead of having
to employ Cahusac, there was another reason for
the greater popularity of Lully. Under Louis
XIV. the king's patronage was quite sufficient
to ensure the success of an artist ; but after
the Regency, under Louis XV., other authorities
asserted themselves, especially the ' philosophes.'
Rameau had first to encounter the vehement
opposition of the Lullists ; this he had suc
ceeded in overcoming, when a company of
Italian singers arrived in Paris, and at once
obtained the attention of the public, and the
support of a powerful party. The partisans of
French music rallied round Rameau, and the
two factions carried on what is known as the
' Guerre des Bouffons,' but when the struggle
was over, Rameau perceived that his victory was
only an ephemeral one, and that his works would
not maintain their position in the repertoire of
the Acade'mie beyond a few years. With a frank
ness very touching in a man of his gifts, he said
one evening to the Abbd Arnaud, who had lately
arrived in Paris, ' If I were 20 years younger
I would go to Italy, and take Pergolesi for iny
model, abandon something of my harmony, and
devote myself to attaining truth of declamation,
which should be the sole guide of musicians.
But after sixty one cannot change ; experience
points plainly enough the best course, but the
mind refuses to obey.' No critic could have
stated the truth more plainly. Not having
heard Italian music in his youth, Rameau never
attained to the skill in writing for the voice that
he might have done ; and he is in consequence
only the first French musician of his time, in
stead of taking his rank among the great com
posers of European fame. But for this, he might
have effected that revolution in dramatic music
which Gluck accomplished some years later.
But even as it was, his life's work is one of which
any man might have been proud ; and in old age
he enjoyed privileges accorded only to talent
of the first rank. The directors of the Ope'ra
decreed him a pension; his appearance in his
box was the signal for a general burst of applause,
72
EAMEAU.
and at the last performance of ' Dardanus '
(Nov. 9, 1760) he received a perfect ovation
from the audience. At Dijon the Academic
elected him a member in 1761, and the autho
rities exempted himself and his family for ever
from the municipal taxes. The king had named
him composer of his chamber music in 1745 >
his patent of nobility was registered, and he
was on the point of receiving the order of St.
Michel, when, already suffering from the in
firmities of age, he took typhoid fever, and
died Sept. 12, 1764. All France mourned for
him ; Paris gave him a magnificent funeral, and
in many other towns funeral services were held
in his honour. Such marks of esteem are ac
corded only to the monarchs of art.
Having spoken of Rameau as a theorist and
composer, we will now say a word about him as
a man. If we are to believe Grimm and Diderot,
he was hard, churlish, and cruel, avaricious
to a degree, and the most ferocious of egotists.
The evidence of these writers is however sus
picious ; both disliked French music, and Diderot,
as the friend and colluborateur of d'Alembert,
would naturally be opposed to the man who
had had the audacity to declare war against the
Encyclopedists.1 It is right to say that, though
he drew a vigorous and scathing portrait of the
composer, he did not publish it.2 As to the
charge of avarice, Rameau may have been
fond of money, but he supported his sister
Catherine 3 during an illness of many years, and
assisted more than one of his brother artists-
such as Dauvergne, and the organist Balbatre.
He was a vehement controversialist, and those
whom he had offended would naturally say hard
things of him. He was scrupulous in the use of
his time, and detested interruptions ; at the
rehearsals of his operas he would sit by himself in
the middle of the pit, and allow no one to speak
to him ; in the street he would walk straight on,
and if a friend stopped him, he seemed to awake
as if from a trance. Tall, and thin almost to
emaciation, his sharply-marked features indicated
great strength of character, while his eyes burned
with the fire of genius. There was a decided
resemblance between him and Voltaire, and
painters have often placed their likenesses side
by side. Amongst the best portraits of Rameau
may be specified those of Benoist (after Restout),
Caffieri, Masquelier, and Carmontelle (full length).
In the fine oil-painting by Chardin in the Museum
of Dijon, he is represented seated, with his
fingers on the strings of his violin, the instru
ment he generally used in composing. The bust
1 Kameau was asked to correct the articles on music for the Ency-
clope'die, but the M.SS. were not submitted to him. He published in
consequence: ' Erreurs sur la musique dans 1'Encyclope'die ' (1755) ;
' Suite des Erreurs etc.' (1756) ; ' RiSponse de M. Kameau a MM. les
e"diteurs de 1'Encyclopedie sur leur Avertissement ' (1757) ; 'Lettre de
M. d'Alembert a M. Rameau, concernant le corps sonore, avec la
re"ponse de M. Rameau ' (undated, but apparently 1759)— all printed in
Paris.
2 We refer to Diderot's violent satire on the morals and philosophic
tendencies of the 18th century, entitled ' Le Neveu de Rameau.' It is
a curious fact that this brilliantly written dialogue was only known
in France through a re-translation of Goethe's German version. The
first French edition, by Saur, appeared in Paris only in 1821.
3 A good player on the clavecin; she lived in Dijon, and died there
17C2.
RAMM.
which stood in the foyer of the Ope'ra was de
stroyed when the theatre was burnt down in
1781 ; that in the library of the Conservatoire is
by Destreez (1865). A bronze statue by Guil-
laume was erected at Dijon in 1880. The fine
medal of him given to the winners of the grand
prix de Rome was engraved by Gatteaux.
There are many biographies of Rameau ; the
most valuable are, among the older, Chabanon's
'Eloge' (1764); Maret's 'Eloge historique'
(1766) ; and the very curious details contained
in De Croix's 'L'Ami des Arts' (1776); among
the more modern, the notices of Adolphe Adam,
Fe'tis, Poisot (1864), and Pougin (1876).
Rameau had one son and two daughters, none
of them musicians. He left in MS. 4 cantatas,
3 motets with chorus, and fragments of an opera
' Roland,' all which are now in the BibliothSque
Nationale in the Rue Richelieu. None of his
organ pieces have survived ; and some cantatas
mentioned by the earlier biographers, besides
two lyric tragedies ' Abaris ' and ' Linus,' and a
comic opera, ' Le Procureur dupe,' are lost; but
they would have added nothing to his fame.
Some of his harpsichord pieces have been pub
lished in the ' Tremor des Pianistes ' ; in the ' Alte
Klaviermusik ' of Pauer (Ser. 2, pt. 5) and of
Roitsch ; also in Pauer's ' Alte Meister, ' and in
the ' Perles Musicales' (51, 52). [G.C.]
RAMM, FKIEDRICH, eminent oboe-player, born
Nov. 1 8, i744> in Mannheim. He was a member
of the Elector's celebrated band under Cannabich,
first in Mannheim, and then in Munich, whither
the court removed, and where he celebrated his
fiftieth year of service in 1808. His tone was
particularly pure and true, with great roundness,
softness, and power in the lower notes ; and he was
also a master of the legato style. ' Ramm is a
downright good fellow,' writes Mozart, ' amusing
and honourable too ; he plays finely, with a pretty
delicate tone.' Mozart sent him the oboe-concerto
(Kochel, 293) composed for Ferlendi (which be
came his cheval de bataille), and when in Paris
composed a symphonie concertante for Wendling,
Ramm, Punto, and Ritter, to be played at the
Concerts Spirituels. It was however never per
formed, and all trace of it is lost ( Jahn, i. 476).
Ramm played in London at the Professional
Concerts in 1 784. In Vienna he gave a concert at
the Karnthnerthor Theatre in 1787, and played
three times at the concerts of the Tonkunstler-
Societat between the years 1776 and Si.
He was in Vienna again, after April I797> an<^
assisted to accompany Beethoven at a perform
ance of his PF. Quintet, op. 16. At one of the
pauses of the Finale Beethoven went off into a
long improvisation, and it was, says Ries,* most
amusing to see the players putting up their in
struments to their lips as they thought that
Beethoven was approaching the reprise of the
theme, and as regularly putting them down in
disappointment as he modulated off in another
direction. Ramm was especially annoyed. [C.F.P.]
4 Biogr. Notizen, p. 80. The beginning of this anecdote— Am nSm-
lichen Abend— on the same evening— would seem to show that Ries's
recollections are not printed iu the order ill which he wrote them.
RAMSEY.
EAMSEY, EGBERT, organist of Trinity Col
lege, Cambridge, from 1628 to 1644 inclusive,
and ' Magister Choristarum' from 1637 to 1644
inclusive ; but whether before or after those dates
is not certain in either case. He took the degree
of Mus. Bac. at Cambridge about 1639. ^ Morn
ing and Evening Service in F by him is contained
in the Tudvvay Collection (Barl. MS. 7340) and
in the Ely Library, where, and at Peterhouse Col
lege, Cambi'idge, there are also two anthems of
his. Add. MS. 11,608 in the British Museum
also contains a dialogue between Saul, the witch,
and Samuel — ' In guiltie night.' Tudway mis
calls him John. [G.]
RANDALL, JOHN, Mus. Doc., born 1715, was
a chorister of the Chapel Royal under Bernard
Gates. He was one of the boys who shared in
the representation of Handel's 'Esther ' at Gates's
house, Feb. 23, 1732, he himself taking the part
of Esther. He graduated as Mus. Bac. at Cam
bridge in 1744, hi8 exercise being an anthem.
About 1 745 he was appointed organist of King's
College, and on the death of Dr. Greene in 1755
was elected Professor of Music at Cambridge.
In 1756 he proceeded Mus. Doc. He composed
the music for Gray's Ode for the Installation of the
Duke of Grafton as Chancellor of the University
in 1768, and some, church music. He died March
18, 1799. His name is preserved in England by
his two Double Chants. [W.H.H.]
RANDALL, RICHARD, a tenor singer, born
Sept. I, 1736, whose life is sufficiently described
in the inscription to his portrait, published May
1812 : — 'This celebrated tenor singer so remark
able for his great strength of voice and unrivalled
comic humour was born Sepbr Ist 1736 and edu
cated under Mr Bernd Gates in the Chapel Royal
where he was early noticed and became a great
favourite of his late Majesty George the second,
by whose command he sung many Solo Anthems,
he is the only remaining chorister who sung with
M. Handel in his Oratorios, and whose composi
tions he still performs with most wonderfull effect
at the age of 76.'
Randall died April IE;, 1828, aged 92. In his
last days he was an object of much curiosity as
having known Handel, regarding whom he told
several anecdotes. [G.]
RANDALL, WILLIAM, an eminent publisher
of music. [See WALSH, JOHN.]
RANDALL. The name of Randall is attached
to an anthem for 6 voices in the British Museum,
Add. MS. 17,792, probably dating from the be
ginning of the 1 8th century. [G.]
RANDEGGER, ALBERTO, composer, con
ductor, and singing-master, was born at Trieste,
April 13, 1832. He began the study of music at
the age of 13, under Lafont for the PF., and
L. Ricci for composition, soon began to write, and
by the year 1852 was known as the composer of
several masses and smaller pieces of Church music,
and of two ballets — ' La Fidanzata di Castella-
mare' and 'LaSposad'Appenzello,' both produced
at the Teatro grande of his native town. In the
latter year he joined three other of Ricci's pupils
RANDHARTINGER.
73
in the composition of a buffo opera to a libretto
by Gaetano Rossi, entitled ' II Lazzarone,' which
had much success, first at the Teatro Maurona at
Trieste, and then elsewhere. The next two years
were occupied as musical director of theatres at
Fiume, Zera, Sinigaglia, Brescia, and Venice. In
the winter of 1854 he brought out a tragic opera in
4 acts called ' Bianca Capello ' at the chief theatre
of Brescia. At this time Signor Randegger was
induced to come to London. He gradually took
a high position there, and has become widely
known as a teacher of singing, conductor, and com
poser, and an enthusiastic lover of good music of
whatever school or country. He has resided in
England ever since, and is one of the most
prominent musical figures in the metropolis. In
1864 he produced at the Theatre Royal, Leeds,
' The Rival J^taities,' a comic operetta in 2 acts,
which has hac^much success in London and
many other places. In 1868 he became Pro
fessor of Singing at the Royal Academy of
Music, and has since been made a director of
that institution and a member of the Committee
of Management. In the autumn of 1857 Be con"
ducted a series of Italian operas at St. James's
Theatre, and in 1879-80 the Carl Rosa company
at Her Majesty's Theatre. He has recently been
appointed conductor of the Norwich Festival
vice Sir Julius Benedict resigned.
Mr.Randegger's published works are numerous
and important. They comprise a large dramatic
cantata (words by Mad. Rudersdorff), entitled
' Fridolin,' composed for the Birmingham Festi
val, and produced there with great success, Aug.
28, 1873 (Chappell) ; two soprano scenas —
' Medea,' sung by Mad. Rudersdorff at the
Gewandhaus, Leipzig, in 1869, and 'Saffo,' sung
by Mad. Lemmens at the British Orchestral
Society, March 31, 1875 ; the I5oth Psalm, for
soprano solo, chorus, orchestra and organ, for the
Boston Festival, 1872 ; Funeral Anthem for the
death of the Prince Consort, twice performed in
London ; and a large number of songs and con
certed vocal music for voice and orchestra or
PF. He is also the author of the Primer of
Singing, in Dr. Stainer's series (Novello). As a
teacher of singing Mr. Randegger has a large
number of pupils now before the English public
as popular singers. [G.]
RANDHARTINGER, BENEDICT, an Aus
trian musician, memorable for his connexion
with Schubert. He was born at Ruprechtshofen,
in Lower Austria, July 27, 1802 ; at 10 years
old came to the Konvict school at Vienna, and
was then a pupil of Salieri's. He afterwards
studied for the law, and for ten years was
Secretary to Count Sze'chenyi, an official about
the Court. But he forsook this line of life for
music; in 1832 entered the Court Chapel as a
tenor singer ; in 1844 became Vice-Court-Capell-
meister, and in 1862, after Assmayer's death,
entered on the full enjoyment of that dignity.
His compositions are more than 600 in number,
comprising an opera, ' Konig Enzio '; 20 masses ;
60 motets ; symphonies ; quartets, etc. ; 400 songs,
76 4-part songs, etc. Of all these, 1 24, chiefly songs,
74
RANDHARTINGER.
are published ; also a vol. of Greek national songs,
and a vol. of Greek liturgies. His acquaintance
with Schubert probably began at the Konvict, and
at Salieri's ; though as he was Schubert's junior
by five years, they can have been there together
only for a short time ; but there are many slight
traces of the existence of a close friendship
between them. He was present, for example,
at the first trial of the D minor String Quartet
(Jan. 29, 1826), and he was one of the very few
friends — if not the only one — who visited Schu
bert in the terrible loneliness of his last illness.
But for Randhartinger it is almost certain that
Schubert's ' Schone Miillerin' would never have
existed. He was called out of his room while
Schubert was paying him a visit, and on his
return found that his friend had disappeared
with a volume of W. Miiller's poems which he
had accidentally looked into while waiting, and
had been so much interested in as to carry off.
On his going the next day to reclaim the book,
Schubert presented him with some of the now
well-known songs, which he had composed during
the night. This was in 1823. It is surely enough
to entitle Randhartinger to a perpetual memory.
He had a brother JOSEF, of whom nothing is
known beyond this — that he was probably one of
the immediate entourage of Beethoven's coffin at
the funeral. He, Lachner, and Schubert are said
to have gone together as torch-bearers (Kreissle
von Hellborn's ' Schubert,' p. 266). [G.]
RANELAGH HOUSE AND GARDENS
were situated on the bank of the Thames, east
ward of Chelsea Hospital. They were erected
and laid out about 1690 by Richard Jones, Vis
count (afterwards Earl of) Ranelagh, who resided
there until his death in 1712. In 1733 the pro
perty was sold in lots, and eventually the house
and part of the gardens came into the hands of
a number of persons who converted them into a
place of public entertainment. In 1741 they com
menced the erection of a- spacious Rotunda (185
feet external, and 150 feet internal diameter),
with four entrances through porticos. Surround
ing it was an arcade, and over that a covered
gallery, above which were the windows, 60 in
number. In the centre of the interior and sup
porting the roof was a square erection containing
the orchestra, as well as fireplaces of peculiar
construction for warming the building in winter.
Forty-seven boxes, each to contain eight persons,
were placed round the building, and in these the
company partook of tea and coffee. In the garden
was a Chinese building, and a canal upon which
the visitors were rowed about in boats. Ranelagh
was opened with a public breakfast, April 5, 1 742.
The admission was 2s. including breakfast. On
May 24 following it was opened for evening
concerts ; Beard was the principal singer, Festing
the leader, and the choruses were chiefly from
oratorios. Twice a week ridottos were given,
the tickets for which were £i is. each, including
supper. Masquerades were shortly afterwards in
troduced, and the place soon became the favourite
resort of the world of fashion. Ranelagh was
afterwards opened about the end of February for
RANELAGH HOUSE AND GARDENS.
breakfasts, and on Easter Monday for the evening
entertainments. On April 10, 1746, a new organ
by Byfield was opened at a public morning re
hearsal of the music for the season, and Parry,
the celebrated Welsh harper, appeared. In 1749,
in honour of the Peace of Aix-la-Chapelle, an en
tertainment called 'A Jubilee Masquerade in
the Venetian manner,' was given, of which Horace
Walpole, in a letter to Sir Horace Mann, dated
May 3, 1749, gave the following lively descrip
tion : —
' It had nothing Venetian about it, but was by far the
best understood and the prettiest spectacle I ever saw ;
nothing in a fairy tale ever surpassed it. ... It began
at three o'clock, and about five, people of fashion began
to go. When you entered you found the whole garden
filled with masks and spread with tents, wliich remained
all night very commodely. In one quarter was a May
pole dressed with garlands, and people dancing round it
to a tabor and pipe and rustic music, all masqued, as
were all the various bands of music that were disposed
in different parts of the garden, some like huntsmen
with French-horns, some like peasants, and a troop of
Harlequins and Scaramouches in the little open temple
on the mount. On the canal was a sort of gondola
adorned with flags and streamer3} and filled with music,
rowing about. All round the outside of the amphitheatre
were shops, filled with Dresden china, Japan, etc., and
all the shopkeepers in mask. The amphitheatre was
illuminated ; and in the middle was a circular bower,
composed of all kinds of firs in tubs from twenty to
thirty feet high ; under them orange trees with small
lamps in each orange, and below them all sorts of the
finest auriculas in pots ; and festoons of natural flowers
hanging from tree to tree. Between the arches, too,
were firs, and smaller ones in the balconies above.
There were booths for tea and wine, gaming-tables and
dancing, and about two thousand persons. In short it
pleased me more than anything I ever saw. It is to be
once more, and probably finer as to dresses, as there has
since been a subscription masquerade, and people will
go in their rich habits.'
This proved so attractive that it was repeated
several times in that and succeeding years, until
the suppression of such entertainments after the
earthquake at Lisbon in 1755. In 1751 morning
concerts were given twice a week, Signora Frasi
and Beard being the singers. At that date it had
lost none of its charm. ' You cannot conceive,' says
Mrs. Ellison, in Fielding's 'Amelia,' 'what a sweet
elegant delicious place it is. Paradise itself can
hardly be equal to it.' In 1754 an entertain
ment of singing, recitation, etc. was given under
the name of ' Comus's Court,' which was very
successful. In 1755 a pastoral, the words from
Shakspere, the music by Arne, was produced;
Beard and Miss Young were the singers ; Han
del's ' L' Allegro ed II Pensieroso' was introduced
on Beard's benefit night, and Stanley was the
organist. In 1759 Bonnell Thornton's burlesque
Ode on St. Cecilia's day was performed with great
success. In 1762 Tenducci was the principal male
singer. In 1764 a new orchestra was erected in
one of the porticos of the Rotunda, the original
one being found inconvenient from its height.
On June 29, 1764, Mozart, then eight years old,
performed on the harpsichord and organ several
pieces of his own composition for the benefit of a
charity. In 1770 Burney was the organist. Fire
works were occasionally exhibited, when the price
of admission was raised to 53. In 1 777 the fashion
able world played one of its strange, unreasoning
freaks at Ranelagh. Walpole wrote on June 18 : —
' It is the fashion now to go to Ranelagh two hours
after it is over. You may not believe this, but it
RANELAGH HOUSE AND GARDENS.
is literal. The music ends at ten, the company
go at twelve.' This practice caused the concert
to be commenced at a later hour than before. In
1 790 a representation of Mount .ZEtna in eruption,
with the Cyclops at work in the centre of the
mountain, and the lava pouring down its side, was
exhibited. The mountain was 80 feet high. In
1793 the Chevalier d'Eon fenced in public with
a French professor, and about the same time re
gattas on the Thames in connection with the place
were established. In 1802 the Installation Ball
of the Knights of the Bath was given at Rane-
lagh, and also a magnificent entertainment by the
Spanish Ambassador. These were the last occur
rences of any importance; the fortunes of the place
had long been languishing, and it opened for the
last time July 8, 1803. On Sept. 30, 1805, the
proprietors gave directions for taking down the
house and rotunda ; the furniture was soon after
sold by auction, and the buildings removed. The
organ was placed in Tetbury Church, Gloucester
shire. No traces of Ranelagh remain : the site now
forms part of Chelsea Hospital garden. [W.H.H.]
RANK. A rank of organ-pipes is one com
plete series or set, of the same quality of tone
and kind of construction from the largest to the
smallest, controlled by one draw-stop, acting on
one slider. If the combined movement of draw-
stop and slider admits air to two or more such
series of pipes, an organ-stop is said to be of two
or more ranks, as the case may be. Occasionally
the twelfth and fifteenth, or fifteenth and twenty-
second, are thus united, forming a stop of two
ranks; but, as a rule, only those stops whose
tones are reinforcements of some of the higher
upper-partials of the ground-tone are made to
consist of several ranks, such as the Sesquialtera,
Mixture, Furniture, etc. These stops have
usually from three to five ranks each, reinforc
ing (according to their special disposition) the
ground-tone by the addition of its ijth, I9th,
22nd, 24th, 26th, 2gth, — that is, of its 3rd, 5th,
and 8th in the third and fourth octave above.
[See SESQUIALTERA.] [J.S.]
RANSFORD, EDWIN, baritone vocalist, song
writer, and composer, born March 13, 1805, at
Bourton-on-the- Water, Gloucestershire, died in
London July 1 1, 1876. He first appeared on the
stage as an 'extra' in the opera chorus at the
King's Theatre, Haymarket, and was afterwards
engaged in that of Covent Garden Theatre.
During Mr. Charles Kemble's management of
that theatre he made his first appearance as Don
Caesar in ' The Castle of Andalusia,' on May 2 7,
1829, and was engaged soon afterwards by Mr.
Arnold for the English Opera House (now the
Lyceum). In the autumn of 1829, and in 1830,
he was at Covent Garden. In 1831 he played
leading characters under Elliston at the Surrey
Theatre, and became a general favourite. In 1832
he was with Joe Grimaldi at Sadler's Wells,
playing Tom Truck, in Campbell's nautical drama
' The Battle of Trafalgar,' in which he made a
great hit with Neukomm's song of ' The Sea.' At
this theatre he sustained the part of Captain
Cannonade in Barnett's opera 'The Pet of the
RANZ DES VACHES.
75
Petticoats.' He afterwards fulfilled important
engagements at Drury Lane, the Lyceum, and
Covent Garden. At Covent Garden he played
the Doge of Venice in 'Othello/ March 25, 1833,
when Edmund Kean last appeared on the stage,
and Sir Harry in ' The School for Scandal ' on
Charles Kemble's last appearance as Charles
Surface. His final theatrical engagement was
with Macready at Covent Garden in 1837-38.
He wrote the words of many songs, his best being
perhaps 'In the days when we went gipsying.'
In later years his entertainments, ' Gipsy Life,'
'Tales of the Sea,' and 'Songs of Dibdin,' etc.,
became deservedly popular. As a genial bon
camarade he was universally liked. [W.H.]
RANZ DES VACHES, (Kuhreihen, Kuhrei-
gen ; Appenzell patois Chuereiha), a strain of an
irregular description, which in some parts of
Switzerland is sung or blown on the Alpine horn
in June, to call the cattle from the valleys to the
higher pastures. Several derivations have been
suggested for the words ranz and reihen orrelgen.
Ranz has been translated by the English ' rant,'
and the French ' rondeau,' and has been derived
from the Keltic root ' renk ' or ' rank,' which
may also be the derivation of reihen, in which
case both words would mean the ' procession, or
march, of the cows.' Stalder (' Schweizerisches
Idiotikon') thinks that reihen means 'to reach,'
or ' fetch,' while other authorities say that the
word is the same as reigen (a dance accompanied
by singing), and derive ranz from the Swiss patois
' ranner,' to rejoice.
The Ranz des Vaches are very numerous, and
differ both in music and words in 'the different
cantons. They are extremely irregular in char
acter, full of long cadences and abrupt changes
of tempo. It is a curious fact that they are
seldom strictly in tune, more particularly when
played on the Alpine horn, an instrument in
which, like the BAGPIPE, the note represented
by F is really an extra note between F and F$.
This note is very characteristic of the Ranz des
Vaches ; passages like the following being re
peated and varied almost ad infinitum.
Though of little musical value, a fictitious
interest has been long attached to the Ranz
des Vaches owing to the surroundings in which
they are generally heard. Sung to a piano
forte accompaniment in a concert-room, they
would sound little better than a string of semi-
barbarous cadences, but heard at dawn or at
sunset in some remote Alpine valley, and sung
with the strange gradations of falsetto and chest
voice softened by distance, they possess a peculiar
1 There is a curious analogy between the above and the following
strain, which is sung with infinite variations in the agricultural dis
tricts near London to frighten away the birds from the seed. In both
passages the F is more nearly F$ •
76
EANZ DES VACHES.
and undeniable charm. The most celebrated of
them is that of Appenzell, a copy of which is said
to have been sent to our Queen Anne, with whom
it was a great favourite. The first work in which it
was printed is Georg Rhaw's 'Bicinia ' (Witten
berg, 1545). It is also to be found in a dissertation
on Nostalgia in Zwinger's ' Fasciculus Disserta-
tionum Medicarum' (Basle, 1710). Eousseau
printed a version in his ' Dictionnaire de Musique,'
which Laborde arranged for 4 voices in his ' Essai
BUT la Musique.' It was used by Gretry in his
Overture to ' Guillaume Tell,' and by Adam in
his ' Methode de Piano du Conservatoire.' l It
has been also arranged by Webbe, Weigl, Eossini
('Guillaume Tell ') and Meyerbeer. The following
example is sung in the Alps of Gruyere in the
Canton of Friburg: —
Andante,
~7f — ?J W~f
-MIL.
' ' r P 3 1-
f \ \ i A P
SJ
2
vi> n " ^
r
Le" z'armailli del Co - lorn
p r *
^ V
- bet - t6
| g ~
• =--= P —
— tp« — U — gS
" "5
Di5 bon ma - tin s& s&n 16 - -
^ - • P
ha. Ha
. •
.p" P -
„ I
P • 1
-.eCE
- P t
u •
__»ptKK^- ^
» .
1* I*
~V%£P^~
ha! Ha ha! v^^ Liauba! Liauba! por a - ri-
r^ Allegro.
m UP
* • — •
P A
in
1 1 P
1 •
u
E
M
f ^*
. *_. L.
a ! Vi - en - d(5 to - t6, Bliantz' et na'i - re".
1 • ^ - m -
P P •
• • o
— — r-r-f— r
r r p * • "
• • i
k* ^ ' " V* i*
Rodz'et mot-ai - 16, Dz'jouvenet o - tro.
D6 - zo on tsch^-no
s~ ^ /T\ /T\
• • - A
p p •
s • ^ .. n
— ^S-L^f-^-
, - *- ' *- - . . ^- ^_ - ^ ' : B
Jo'i6 voz' ar - io Dt§ zo on treinblio 'io "ie tieintzo !
Andante. ^ /T\ /r\
m • i A
r*T I _L*n S
f
i*rr f ^
f W"*I^J
9 L
P f ^ tKi^l
C3^"^ Liauba ! Liauba ! por ar - i - a !
jc» ^
6-^*^ Liauba!
• - • •
• II
fe
Liauba! por ari - a! 2 fW B S 1
EAPPOLDI, EDUARD, born at Vienna, Feb.
21, 1839. He was placed by his father at an
early age under Doleschall, and made his first
appearance in his ^th year as violinist, pianist,
and composer. His talent for the pianoforte was so
great as to induce the Countess Banffy to put him
1 Other examples and descriptions will be found Jn the follo-sviag
works:— Cappeller's 'Pilati Montis Historia' (1757); Stolberg's 'Eeise
in Deutschland, der Schweiz, etc." (1794) ; EbeFs ' Schilderung der
GebirgsvOlker der Schweiz' (1798); Sigmund von Wagner's 'Acht
Schweizer Kuhreihen* (1805); the article on Viotti in the 'Decade
Philosophique ' (An 6) ; Castelnau's 'Considerations sur la Nostalgie'
1806) ; Edward Jones's ' Musical Curiosities ' (1811) ; Tarenne's ' Samm-
lung von Schweizer Kuhreihen und Volksliedern' (1818); Huber's
'Recueil de Kanz de Vaches' (1830); and Tobler's ' Appenzellischer
Sprachschatz' (1837).
2 Translation, by Fenimore Cooper:— 'The cowherds of Colombette
arise at an earJy hour, Ha, ha! Ha, ha! Liauba! Liauba! in order to
milk ! Come s,ll of you, Black and white, Ked and mottled, Young and
old ; Beneath this oak I am about to milk you. Beneath this poplar
I am about to press. Liauba ! Liauba ! in order to milk ! '
EASOUMOWSKY.
under Mittag, Thalberg's teacher. But the violin
was the instrument of his choice, and he suc
ceeded in studying it under Jansa, who induced
him to go to London in 1850. Here he made no
recorded appearance. On his return to Vienna
he was so far provided for by the liberality of the
same lady, that he became a pupil of the Conser
vatoire under Hellmesberger from 1851 to 1854.
He then put himself under Bb'hm, and shortly
began to travel, and to be spoken of as a promis
ing player. The first real step in his career was
conducting a concert of Joachim's at Rotterdam
in 1866. At the end of that year he went to
Liibeck as Capellmeister, in 1867 to Stettin in
the same capacity, and -in 1869 to the Landes-
theater at Prague. During this time he was
working hard at the violin, and also studying com
position with Sechter and Hiller. From 1870 to
77 he was a colleague of Joachim's at the Hoch-
schule at Berlin — where he proved himself a
first-rate teacher — and a member of his Quartet
party. In 1876 he was made Eoyal Professor,
and soon after received a call to a Concertmeister-
ship at Dresden. This however his love for
Joachim and for Berlin, where he had advanced
sufficiently to lead the Quartets alternately with
his chief, induced him for a long time to hesitate
to accept, notwithstanding the very high terms
offered. At length, however, he did accept it,
and is now joint Concertmeister with Lauterbach
at the Dresden opera, and chief teacher in the
Conservatorium. Though a virtuoso of the first
rank, he has followed in the footsteps of Joachim
by sacrificing display to the finer interpretation
of the music, and has succeeded in infusing a
new spirit into chamber-music at Dresden. He
has composed symphonies, quartets, sonatas, and
songs, some of which hav« been printed. They
are distinguished for earnestness, and for great
beauty of form, and a quartet was performed in
Dresden in the winter of 1878 which aroused
quite an unusual sensation. In 1874 Rappoldi
married a lady who is nearly as distinguished as
himself — Miss LAURA KAHEER, who was born in
Vienna in 1853, and whose acquaintance he made
many years before at Prague. Her talent, like
his, showed itself very early. On the nomination
of the Empress Elisabeth she became a pupil of
the Conservatorium at Vienna, under Dachs and
DessofF, from 1866 to 69. After taking the first
prize, she made a tournee to the principal towns of
Germany, ending at Weimar. There she studied
under Liszt, and matured that beauty of touch,
precision, fire, and intelligence, which have raised
her to the first rank of pianists in Germany, and
which induced Herr von Biilow — no lenient critic
— to praise her playing of Beethoven's op. 106 in
the highest terms. She is the worthy colleague
of her husband in the best concerts of Dres
den. Mme. Kahrer-Eappoldi has not yet visited
England. [G.]
EASOUMOWSKY,3 ANDREAS KTRILLO-
VITSCH, a Eussian nobleman to whom Beethoven
3 Pronounced Rasumoffsky, -which is Beethoven's spelling in the
dedication of the 5th and 6th Symphonies ; Rasoumoflsky in that of
the Quartets.
RASOUMOWSKY.
dedicated three of his greatest works, and whose
name will always survive in connexion with the
' Rasoumowsky Quartets' (op. 59). He was the
son of Kyrill (i.e. Cyril) Rasum, a peasant of
Lemeschi, a village in the Ukraine, who, with
his elder brother, was made a Count (Graf) by
the Empress Elisabeth of Russia. Andreas was
born Oct. 22, 1752, served in the English and
Russian navies, rose to the rank of admiral, and
was Russian ambassador at Venice, Naples, Copen
hagen, Stockholm, and Vienna. In England his
name must have been familiar, or Foote would
hardly have introduced it as he has in 'The Liar'
(1762). At Vienna he married, in 1788, Elisabeth
Countess of Thun, one of the 'three Graces,'
elder sister of the Princess Carl Lichnowsky
[see vol. ii. 132 a]; and on March 25, 1792,
had his audience from the Emperor of Austria
as Russian ambassador, a post which he held
with short intervals for more than 20 years. He
was a thorough musician, an excellent player
of Haydn's quartets, in which he took 2nd
violin, not improbably studying them under
Haydn himself. That, with his connexion with
Lichnowsky, he must have known Beethoven is
obvious ; but no direct trace of the acquaintance
is found until May 26, 1806 (six weeks after the
withdrawal of Fidelio), which Beethoven — in his
usual polyglott — has marked on the first page
of the Quartet in F of op. 59, as the date on
which he began it — ' Quartet to angefangen am
26ten May 1806.'
In 1808 the Count was in possession of his
own palace, in the Landstrasse suburb, on the
Donau Canal, an enormous building 'on which for
nearly 20 years he lavished all his means,' now
the Geological Institute; and in the summer
or autumn of the same year formed his famous
quartet party — Suhuppanzigh, 1st violin ; Weiss,
viola ; Lincke, cello ; and he himself 2nd violin1
— which for many years met in the evenings, and
performed, among other compositions, Beethoven's
pieces, 'hot from the fire,' under his own im
mediate instructions.
In April 1809 appeared the C minor and
Pastoral Symphonies (^Nos. 5 and 6), with a dedi
cation (on the Parts) to Prince Lobkowitz and
' son excellence Monsieur le Comte de Rasum-
offsky ' (Breitkopf & H artel). These dedications
doubtless imply that Beethoven was largely the
recipient of the Count's bounty, but there is
no direct evidence of it, and there is a strange
absence of reference to the Count in Beethoven's
letters. His name is mentioned only once — July
24, 1813 — and there is a distant allusion in a
letter of a much later date (Nohl, Briefe B. 1865,
No. 354). How different to the affection, the
jokes, the grumbling, the intimate character, of
his notes to his other friends and supporters !
In the autumn of 1814 came the Vienna Congress
(Nov. 1, 1814 — June 9, 1815), and as the Empress
of Russia was in Vienna at the time, the Am
bassador's Palace was naturally the scene of
special festivities It was not however there
that Beethoven was presented to the Empress,
1 Afterwards played by Sina.
RASOUMOWSKY.
77
but at the Archduke Rodolph's.2 The Count's
hospitalities were immense, and, vast as was his
palace, a separate wooden annexe had to be con
structed capable of dining 700 persons.
On June 3, 1815, six days before the signa
ture of the final Act of the Congress, the Count
was made Prince (Flirst), and on the 3ist of the
following December the dining-hall just mentioned
was burnt down. The Emperor of Russia gave
400,000 silver roubles (£40,000) towards the
rebuilding, but the misfortune appears to have
been too much for the Prince ; he soon after sold
the property, pensioned his quartet, and disappears
from musical history. The quartet kept together
for many years after this date, Sina playing 2nd
violin. Beethoven mentions them a propos to
the Gallitzin Quartets in the letter to his nephew
already referred to, about 1825. [A.W. T.]
The three quartets to which Rasoumowsky's
name is attached form op. 59, and are in F, E
minor, and C respectively. The first of the three,
as already mentioned, was begun May 26, 1806,
and the whole three were finished and had
evidently been played before Feb. 27, 1807, the
date of a letter in the Allg. mus. Zeitung de
scribing their characteristics.3 They were pub
lished in Jan. 1808 (Vienna Bureau des Arts ;
Pesth, Schreyvogel), and the dedication (on the
Parts) begins 'Trois Quatuors tres humblement
dedides a son Excellence Monsieur le Comte,'
etc. Beethoven himself mentions them in a letter
to Count Brunswick, which he has dated May 1 1 ,
1806, but which Mr. Thayer (iii. u) sees reason
to date 1807.
The Quartet in F is the one which Bernard
Romberg is said to have thrown on the ground
and trampled upon as unplayable. — The slow
movement is entitled in the Sketchbook ' Einen
Trauerweiden oder Akazienbaum aufsGrabmeines
Bruders ' — A weeping willow or acacia tree over
the grave of my brother. But which brother ? Au
gust died in 1783, 23 years before, Carl not till
10 years after, and Johann not till 1848. Carl's
marriage-contract had however been signed only
on May 25, 1806. Is it possible that this in
scription is a Beethovenish joke on the occasion ?
If so, he began in fun and ended in earnest. —
Mendelssohn was accustomed to say that this
Quartet, and that in F minor (op. 95), were the
most Beethovenish of all Beethoven's works. —
The finale has a Russian theme in D minor for
its principal subject : —
Th£me russe. Allegro.
sempre
2 Schindler, i. 233 (quoted by Thayer, iii. 321). The statement under
BEETHOVEN [vol. i. 192 a] is incorrect,
3 They are again alluded to in the number for May 5 as more and
more successful, and possibly to be soon published ; and then, with
astonishing na'ivett, follows ' Eberl's newest compositions, too, ara
anticipated with great pleasure ' I
7S
RASOUMOWSKY.
The 2nd of the three has a Russian theme in
E major as the Trio of its third movement : —
(Allegretto). Theme russe.
S2
•*=-•-
w
cresc.
It would be interesting to know the original
names and forms of these two themes: they do
not appear to have been yet identified. [G.]
RATAPLAN, like Rub-a-dub, appears to be
an imitative word for the sound of the drum, as
TAN-TA-RA is for that of the trumpet, and Tootle-
tootle for the flute.1 It is hardly necessary to
mention its introduction by Donizetti in the
'Fille du Regiment,' or by Meyerbeer in the
' Huguenots' ; and every Londoner is familiar with
it in Sergeant Bouncer's part in Sullivan's ' Cox
and Box,' especially in his first song, 'Yes, yes,
in those merry days.' ' Rataplan, der kleine
Tambour ' is the title of a Singspiel by Pillwitz,
which was produced at Bremen in 1831, and had
a considerable run both in North and South
Germany between that year and 1836. [G.]
RAUZZINI, VENANZIO, born 174^, in Rome,
where he made his d£but in 1765, captivating
his audience by his fine voice, clever acting,
and prepossessing appearance. In 1767 he
sang in Vienna, and then accepted an engage
ment in Munich, where four of his operas were
performed. In London he made his first ap
pearance in 1774. Here also he distinguished
himself as an excellent teacher of singing, Miss
Storace, Braham, Miss Poole (afterwards Mrs.
Dickons), and Incledon, being among his pupils.
In 1778 and 79 ne gave subscription concerts
with the violinist Lamotte, when they were as
sisted by such eminent artistes as Miss Harrop,
Signor Rovedino, Fischer, Cervetto, Stamitz,
Decamp, and Clementi. He also gave brilliant
concerts in the new Assembly Rooms (built 1771)
at Bath, where he took up his abode on leaving
London. Here he invited Haydn and Dr. Burney
to visit him, and the three spent several pleasant
days together in 1794. On this occasion Haydn
wrote a four-part canon (or more strictly a round)
to an epitaph on a favourite dog buried in Rauz-
zini's garden, 'Turk was a faithful dog and not a
man.' a Rauzzini's operas performed in London
were ' La Regina di Golconda' (1775); 'Armida'
(1778); 'Creusa in Delfo ' (1782); and 'La
Vestale' (1787). He composed string-quartets,
sonatas for PF., Italian arias and duets, and
English songs ; also a Requiem produced at the
little Haymarket Theatre in 1801, by Dr. Arnold
and Salomon. He died, universally regretted, at
Bath in 1810. His brother
MATTEO, born in Rome 1754, made his first
appearance at Munich in 1772, followed his
brother to England, and settled in Dublin, where
1 Other forms are Patapataplan, Palalalalan, Bumberumbumbum.
gee the Dictionnaire Encyclope'dique of Sachs & Villatte.
2 For this Round see Pohl, Haydn in London, p. 276.
RAVINA.
he produced an opera, ' II Re pastore.' He
employed himself in teaching singing, and died
in 1 79 1. [C.F.P.]
RAVENSCROFT, JOHN, one of the Tower
Hamlets waits, and violinist at Goodman's Fields
Theatre, was noted for his skill in the composi
tion of hornpipes, a collection of which he pub
lished. Two of them are printed in Hawkins's
History. He died about 1 740. [W.H.H.]
RAVENSCROFT, THOMAS, Mus. Bac., born
about 1582, was a chorister of St. Paul's under
Edward Pearce, and graduated at Cambridge in
1607. IB J6o9 he edited and published 'Pam-
melia. Musickes Miscellanie: or Mixed Varietie
of pleasant Roundelayes and delightful Catches
of 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Parts in one' — the earliest
collection of rounds, catches and canons printed
in this country. A second impression appeared
in 1618. Later in 1609 he put forth 'Deutero-
melia ; or the Second Part of Musick's Melodic,
or melodius Musicke of Pleasant Roundelaies;
K. H. mirth, or Freemen's Songs and such de-
lightfull Catches ' ; containing the catch, ' Hold
thy peace, thou knave,' sung in Shakspere's
'Twelfth Night.' In 1611 he published 'Me-
lismata. Musicall Phansies, fitting the Court,
Citie, and Countrey Humours, to 3, 4 and 5
Voyces.' In 1611 he published 'A Briefe Dis
course of the true (but neglected) use of
Charact'ring the Degrees by their Perfection,
Imperfection, and Diminution in Mensurable
Musicke against the Common Practise and Cus-
tome of these Times ; Examples whereof are
exprest in the Harmony of 4 Voyces Concerning
the Pleasure of 5 usuall Recreations. I. Hunt
ing. 2. Hawking. 3. Dancing. 4. Drinking.
5. Enamouring' — a vain attempt to resuscitate
an obsolete practice. The musical examples were
composed by Edward Pearce, John Bennet, and
Ravenscroft himself. In 1621 he published the
work by which he is best known, ' The Whole
Booke of Psalmes : With the Hymnes Evan-
gelicall and Spirituall. Composed into 4 parts
by Sundry Authors with severall Tunes as have
been and are usually sung in England, Scotland,
Wales, Germany, Italy, France, and the Nether
lands.' Another edition ' newly corrected and
enlarged' was published in 1633. Four anthems
or motets by Ravenscroft are among the MSS.
in the library of Christ Church, Oxford. The date
of his death is not known. It is said by some
to have been about 1630, and by others about
1635- [W.H.H.]
RAVINA, JEAN HENRT, a pianoforte com
poser, was born May 20, 1818, at Bourdeaux,
where his mother was a prominent musician. At
the instance of Rode and Ziminermann the lad
was admitted to the Conservatoire of Paris in
1831. His progress was rapid— 2nd prize for
PF. in 1832; 1st prize for the same in 1834;
1st for harmony and accompaniment in 1835,
a joint professorship of PF. Nov. 1835. In Feb.
1837 ne left ^e Conservatoire and embarked on
the world as a virtuoso and teacher. He has
resided exclusively at Paris, with the exception
EAVINA.
of a journey to Russia in 1853, and Spain in
1871. He received the Legion of Honour in
1 86 1. His compositions — of which the latest is
op. 80 — are almost all salon pieces, many of them
very favourite in their time, graceful and effective,
but with no permanent qualities. He has also
published a 4-hand arrangement of Beethoven's
nine symphonies. Ravina is still living in Paris.
The above sketch is indebted to M. Pougin's sup
plement to Fe'tis. [G-]
RAWLINGS, or RAWLINS, THOMAS, born
about 1703, was a pupil of Dr. Pepusch, and
a member of Handel's orchestra at both opera
and oratorio performances. On March 14, 1753?
he was appointed organist of Chelsea Hospital.
He died in 1 767. His son, ROBERT, born in 1 742,
was a pupil of his father, and afterwards of Bar-
'santi. At 17 he was appointed musical page to
the Duke of York, with whom he travelled on
the continent until his death in 1767, when he
returned to England and became a violinist in
the King's band and Queen's private band. He
died in 1814, leaving a son, THOMAS A., born
in 17/5, who studied music under his father
and Dittenhofer. He composed some instru
mental music performed at the Professional
Concerts, became a violinist at the Opera and
the best concerts, and a teacher of the pianoforte,
violin and thorough-bass. He composed and
arranged many pieces for the pianoforte, and
some songs. [W.H.H.]
RAYMOND AND AGNES, a 'grand ro
mantic English Opera in 3 acts'; words by E.
Fitzball, music by E. J. Loder. Produced at St.
James's Theatre, London, June n, 1859. [G-.]
RE. The second note of the natural scale in
solmisation and in the nomenclature of France
and Italy, as Ut (or Do) is the first, Mi the
third, and Fa the fourth — •
r/ queant laxis resonare film's
Ifrra gestorum, /amuli tuorum.
By the Germans and English it is called D.
The number of double vibrations per second
for D is — ; Paris diapason 580-7; London
Philharmonic pitch 606-2. [G.]
RE A, WILLIAM, born in London March 25,
1827; when about ten years old learnt the
pianoforte and organ from Mr. PITTMAN, for
whom he acted as deputy for several years. In
about 1843 he was appointed organist to Christ-
church, Watney Street, and at the same time
studied the pianoforte, composition, and instru
mentation under Sterndale Bennett, appearing
as a pianist at the concerts of the Society oi
British Musicians in 1845. On leaving Christ-
church he was appointed organist to St. Andrew
Undershaft. In 1849 he went to Leipzig,
where his masters were Moscheles and Richter ;
lie subsequently studied under Dreyschock at
Prague. On his return to England, Mr. Rea.gave
chamber concerts at the Beethoven Rooms, and
became (1853) organist to the Harmonic Union.
In 1856 he founded the London Polyhymnian
Choir, to the training of which he devoted much
time, and with excellent results; at the same time
READING.
79
ae conducted an amateur orchestral society. In
1858 he was appointed organist at St. Michael's,
Stock well, and in 1860 was chosen by competition
organist to the corporation of Newcastle on Tyne,
where he also successively filled the same post at
three churches in succession, and at the Elswick
Road Chapel. At Newcastle Mr. Rea has worked
hard to diffuse a taste for good music, though
he has not met with the encouragement which
his labours and enthusiasm deserve. Besides
weekly organ and pianoforte recitals, he formed
a choir of eighty voices, which in 1862 was
amalgamated with the existing Sacred Harmonic
Society of Newcastle. In 1867 he began a
series of excellent orchestral concerts which were
carried on every season for nine years, when
he was compelled to discontinue them, owing to
the pecuniary loss which they entailed. In 1876
he gave two performances of ' Antigone ' at the
Theatre Royal, and since then has devoted most
of his time to training his choir (200 voices),
the Newcastle Amateur Vocal Society, and other
Societies on the Tyne and in Sunderland, be
sides giving concerts at which the best artists
have performed. Mr. Rea's published works com
prise four songs, three organ pieces, and some
anthems. At the close of 1880 he was appointed
organist of St. Hilda's, S. Shields. [W.B.S.]
READING, JOHN. There were three mu
sicians of these names, all organists. The first
was appointed Junior Vicar choral of Lincoln
Cathedral, Oct. 10, 1667, Poor Vicar, Nov. 28,
1667, and Master of the Choristers, June 7, 1670.
He succeeded Randolph Jewett as organist of
Winchester Cathedral in 1675, and retained the
office until 1681, when he was appointed organist
of Winchester College. He died in 1692. He was
the composer of the Latin Graces sung before
and after meat at the annual College election
times, and the well-known Winchester School
song, ' Dulce Domum' ; all printed in Dr. Philip
Hayes's 'Harmonia Wiccamica.' The second
was organist of Chichester Cathedral from 1674
to 1720. Several songs included in collections
published between 1681 and 1688 are probably
by one or other of these two Readings. The third,
born 1677, was a chorister of the Chapel Royal
under Dr. Blow. In 1700 he became organist of
Dulwich College. He was appointed Junior Vicar
and Poor Clerk of Lincoln Cathedral, Nov. 21,
1702, Master of the Choristers, Oct. 5, 1703, and
Instructor of the choristers in vocal music, Sept.
28, 1704. He appears to have resigned these
posts in 1707 and to have returned to London,
where he became organist of St. John, Hackney,
St. Dunstan in the West, St. Mary Woolchurchaw,
Lombard Street, and St. Mary Woolnoth. He pub
lished 'A Book of New Songs (after the Italian
manner) with Symphonies and a Thorough Bass
fitted to the Harpsichord, etc.,' and, whilst
organist of Hackney, ' A Book of New Anthems.'
He was also the reputed composer of the hymn
'Adeste fideles.' He died Sept. 2, 1764.
There was another person named Reading,
who was a singer at Drury Lane in the latter
part of the I7th century. In June 1695 he and
80
BEADING.
Pate, another singer at the theatre, were removed
from their places and fined 20 marks each for
being engaged in a riot at the Dog Tavern, Drury
Lane, but were soon after reinstated.
A Rev. John Reading, D.D., Prebendary of
Canterbury Cathedral, preached there a sermon
in defence of church music, and published it in
1663. [W.H.H.]
REAL FUGUE. That species of Fugue in
which the intervals of the Subject and Answer
correspond exactly, without reference — as in Tonal
Fugue — to the Tonic and Dominant of the scale
in which they are written. Thus, in the follow
ing example, the Answer is an exact reproduction
of the Subject, in the fifth above : —
Subject.
Answer.
whereas, according to the laws of Tonal Fugue,
the Tonic in the Subject should have been re
presented in the Answer by the Dominant, and
vice versd ; thus —
Subject.
Answer.
a^i^
Real Fugue is an invention of much older date
than its tonal analogue ; and is, indeed, the only
kind of Fugue possible in the Ecclesiastical Modes.
For, in those antient tonalities, the Dominant
differs widely from that of the modern Scale, and
exercises widely different functions ; insomuch
that the Answer to a given Subject, constructed
with reference to it, would, in certain Modes, be
so distorted as to set all recognition at defiance.
The idea of such a Dominant as that upon
which we now base our harmonic combinations,
is one which could never have suggested itself
to the mediaeval contrapuntist. Accordingly,
the composers of the I5th and i6th centuries
regulated their Subjects and Answers in con
formity with the principles of the system of
Hexachords. When a strict Answer was in
tended, its Solmisation was made to correspond
exactly, in one Hexachord, with that of the
Subject in another. Where this uniformity of
Solmisation was wanting — as was necessarily the
case when the Answer was made in any other
Interval than that of the Fourth or Fifth above
or below the Subject — the reply was regarded
as merely an imitative one.1 [See HEXACHOBD.]
But, even in imitative replies, the laws of Real
Fugue required that a Fifth should always be
answered by a Fifth, and a Fourth by a Fourth ;
the only license permitted being the occasional
substitution of a Tone for a Semitone, or a Major
for a Minor third. In practice both the strict
and the imitative Answer were constantly em
ployed in the same composition : e.g. in the Kyrie
of Palestrina's 'Missa Brevis,' already quoted as
an example under HEXACHORD, the Subject is
given out by the Alto in the Hexachord of C ;
1 See the admirable exposition of the Laws of Fugue, by J. J. Fux,
"Gradus ad Parnassum,' Vienna 1725, pp. 143, et seg.
REAL FUGUE.
answered strictly by the Bass in that of F; again
answered, in the same Hexachord, by the Treble;
and then imitated, first by the Tenor, and after
wards by the Bass, with a whole Tone, instead
of a Semitone, between the second and third
notes. Among the best writers of the best period
of Art we find these mixed Fugues — which
would now be called 'Fugues of Imitation' — in
much more frequent use than those which con
tinued strict throughout, and forming the founda
tion of some of the finest polyphonic Masses and
Motets.
When the Imitation, instead of breaking off at
the end of the few bars which form the Subject,
continues uninterruptedly throughout an entire
movement, the composition is called a Perpetual
Fugue, or, as we should now say, a Canon. A
detailed classification of the different varieties
of Real Fugue, perpetual, interrupted, strict, or
free, in use during the I4th and I5th centuries,
would be of very little practical service, since the
student who would really master the subject must
of necessity consult the works of the great masters
for himself. In doing this, he will find no lack
of interesting examples, and will do well to begin
by making a careful analysis of Palestrina's
' Missa ad Fugam,' which differs from the work
published by Alfieri and Adrien de Lafage under
the title of ' Missa Canonica,' in one point only,
and that a very curious one. In the ' Missa
Canonica,' in the First or Dorian mode, two
Voices lead off a Perpetual Real Fugue, which
the two remaining Voices supplement with an
other, distinct from, but ingeniously interwoven
with it ; the two Subjects proceeding uninter
ruptedly together until the end of each several
Movement — a style of composition which is tech
nically termed 'Canon, four in two.' In the
'Missa ad Fugam,' in the Seventh Mode, the
four Voices all start with the same Subject, but
after a few bars separate themselves into two
Choirs, each of which diverges into a Perpetual
Real Fugue of its own, which continues unin
terruptedly to the end of the Movement, after
the manner of the ' Missa Canonica.' 2
Though less esteemed by modern Composers
than Tonal Fugue, Real Fugue is still practised
with success even in modern tonalities. John
Sebastian Bach has left us many masterly ex
amples, both for Voices— as in the Mass in B
minor — and for the Organ. Handel has done
the same in some of his finest Choruses, as ' The
earth swallowed them ' in Israel in ^gypt,
and the matchless 'Amen' in the Messiah;
while in no less than five of his six beautiful
Fugues for the Pianoforte (op. 25), Mendelssohn
has forsaken the Tonal for the Real method of
construction.
The converse practice, on the part of antient
Composers, is exceedingly rare, though instances
of pure Tonal Fugue may be found, even in the
2 Choron's edition of the 'Missa ad Fugam' is out of print; but
several copies of the work are preserved in the Library of the British
Museum. [See KACCOLTA GENERALS.] Albrechtsberger gives the
Second Agnus Dei as an example in his 'Griindliche Anweisung zur
Composition,' vol. ii. p. 330 of Merrick's Eng. Transl. (Cocks & Co.)
The 'Missa Canonica' is printed in the 'Cinq Messes de Palestrina,'
edited by Adrien de Lafage (Paris, Launer ; London, Schott & Co.)
REAL FUGUE.
REBEC.
81
1 6th century ; as in Palestrina's beautiful, though
almost unknown Madrigal, ' Vestiva i colli.' l
Subject.
-I — I-
=£=*:
etc.
Ves - ti-va i col - li
Answer.
E^^^ESESEjE
I s> r j — «._[_ , -p
etc.
Ves - ti - va i col - li
The subject, in the Hypodorian Mode, here
passes directly from the note which, in modern
Music, would be the Dominant, to the Final ;
while the Answer, in the Dorian Mode, proceeds
from the Final to the Authentic Dominant — a
method of treatment which anticipates the sup
posed invention of Modern Fugue by more than
a century. Other instances may occasionally be
found among the works of cinque cento Com
posers — as in the Qui tollis of J. L. Hassler's
Missa 'Dixit Maria'2 — but they are very un
common ; and indeed it is only in certain Modes
that they are possible. [W.S.R.]
REAY, SAMUEL, born at Hexham, Mar. 17,
1828 ; was noted for his fine voice and careful
singing as a chorister at Durham Cathedral; and
under Henshaw the organist, and Penson the pre
centor there, became acquainted with much music
outside the regular Cathedral services. After
leaving the choir he had organ lessons from Mr.
Stimpson of Birmingham, and then became suc
cessively organist at St. Andrew's, Newcastle
(1845); St. Peter's, Tiverton (1847); St. John's,
Hampstead (1854) ' St. Saviour's, Southwark
(1856) ; St. Stephen's, Paddington ; Radley Col
lege (1859, succeeding Dr. E. G. Monk) ; Bury,
Lancashire (1861) ; and in 1864 was appointed
' Song-schoolmaster and organist ' of the parish
Church, Newark, a post which he still holds. In
1871 Mr. Reay graduated at Oxford as Mus.
Bac. In 1879 he distinguished himself by pro
ducing at the Bromley and Bow Institute,
London, two comic cantatas of J. S. Bach's
(' Caffee-cantate ' and 'Bauern-cantate'), which
were performed there — certainly for the first time
in England — on Oct. 27, under his direction, to
English words of his own adaptation. Mr. Reay
is noted as a fine accompanyist and extempore
player on the organ. He has published a Morn
ing and Evening Service in F, several anthems,
and 2 madrigals (all Novello) ; but is best known
as a writer of part-songs, some of which (' The
clouds that wrap,' ' The dawn of day ') are de
servedly popular. [G.]
REBEC (Ital. Ribeca, Rilelia', Span. Rate,
Rabel.) The French name (.said to be of Arabic
origin) of that primitive stringed instrument
which was in use throughout western Europe in
the middle ages, and was the parent of the viol and
violin, and is identical with the German ' geige '
and the English 'fiddle'; in outline something
1 Printed, with English words, beginning, 'Sound out my voice,' in
N. Yonge's 'Musica transalpina' (Lond. 1558).
2 Nuremberg, 1599. Keprinted in vol. i. of Proske's ' Mus'ca
divina.' Katisbon 1853.
VOL. III. PT. I.
like the mandoline, of which it was probably the
parent. It was shaped like the half of a pear, and
was everywhere solid except at the two extremities,
the upper of which was formed into a peg-box
identical with that still in use, and surmounted
by a carved human head. The lower half was
considerably cut down in level, thus leaving the
upper solid part of the instrument to form a
natural fingerboard. The portion thus cut down
was scooped out, and over the cavity thus formed
was glued a short pine bell}7, pierced with two
trefoil -shaped soundholes, and fitted with a
bridge and sounclpost. The player either rested
the curved end of the instrument lightly against
the breast, or else held it like the violin, between
the chin and the collar-bone, and bowed it like
the violin. It had three stout gut strings, tuned
like the lower strings of the violin (A. D, G).
Its tone was loud and harsh, emulating the female
voice, according to a French poem of the I3th
century :
Quidam rebecam arcuabant,
Muliebrem vocem confingentes.
An old Spanish poem speaks of ' el rabe* gri-
tador,' or the 'squalling rebec.' This powerful
tone made it useful in the mediaeval orchestra ;
and Henry the Eighth employed the rebec in
his state band. It was chiefly used, however, to
accompany dancing ; and Shakspere's musicians
in Romeo and Juliet, Hugh Rebeck, Simon
Catling (Catgut), and James Soundpost, were
undoubtedly rebec-players. After the inven
tion of instruments of the viol and violin type
it was banished to the streets of towns and to
rustic festivities, whence the epithet ' jocund '
applied to it in Milton's L'Allegro. It was
usually accompanied by the drum or tambourine.
It was in vulgar use in France in the last cen
tury, as is proved by an ordinance issued by
Guignon in his official capacity as ' Roi des
Violons' in 1742, in which street-fiddlers are
prohibited from using anything else; 'II leur
sera permis d'y jouer d'une espece cVinstrument
a trois cordes seulement, et connu sous le nom.
G
82
EEBEC.
de rebec, sans qu'ils puissent se servir d'un
violon a quatre cordes sous quelque pre"texte que
ce soit.' A similar order is extant, dated 1628,
in which it is forbidden to play the treble or bass
violin, ' dans les cabarets et les mauvais lieux,'
but only the rebec. The rebec was extinct in
England earlier than in France. It is now totally
disused, and no specimen is known to exist. Re-
presentations of it in sculpture, painting, manu
scripts, etc., are abundant. The illustration is
from an Italian painting of the I3th cent, engraved
in Vidal's ' Instruments a Archet.' [E. J.P.]
REBEL, JEAN FERRT, born in Paris, 1669.
After a precocious childhood entered the Opera
as a violinist, speedily became accompanyist, and
then leader. In 1 703 he produced ' Ulysse,' opera
in 5 acts with prologue, containing a pas seul for
Fran£oise PreV6t, to an air called '.Le Caprice, ' for
violin solo. The opera failed, but the Caprice
remained for years the test-piece of the ballerine
at the Ope"ra. After this success, Rebel composed
violin solos for various other ballets, such as ' La
Boutade,' ' Les Caracteres de la Danse,' ' Terpsi
chore,' 'LaFantaisie,' 'LesPlaisirs Champetres,'
and ' Les Elements.' Several of these were en
graved, as were his sonatas for the vioiln. Rebel
was one of the ' 24 violons,' and ' compositeur de
la chambre ' to the King. He died in Paris,
1747. His son,
FRANCIS, born in Paris, June 19, 1701, at
13 played the violin in the Ope"ra orchestra. He
thus became intimate with Fra^ois Francoeur,
and the two composed conjointly, and produced
at the Acaddmie, the following operas : — ' Py-
rame et Thisbe" (1726); ' Tarsis et Zelie'
(1728); ' Scanderheg ' (1735); 'Ballet de la
Paix' (1738) ; 'Les Augustales ' and fLe Re-
tour du Roi' (1744); 'Zelindor,' ' Le TropheV
(in honour of Fontenoy, 1745) ; 'Ismene' (1750);
'Les Ge"nies tute'laires ' (1751); and 'Le Prince
de Noisy' (1760) ; most of which were composed
for court f6tes or public rejoicings.
From 1733 to 44 Rebel and Francoeur were
joint leaders of the Academic orchestra, and in
1753 were appointed managers. They soon how
ever retired in disgust at the petty vexations
they were called upon to endure. Louis XV.
made them surintendants of his music, with the
order of St. Michel. In March 1757 these
inseparable friends obtained the privilege of the
Ope"ra, and directed it for ten years on their own
account, with great administrative ability.
Rebel died in Paris Nov. 7, 1775. He com
posed some cantatas, a Te Deum, and a De
Profundis, performed at the Concerts spirituels,
but all his music is now forgotten, excepting a
lively air in the first finale of 'Pyrame et ThisbeV
which was adapted to a much-admired pas seul
of Mile, de Camargo, thence became a popular
contredanse — the first instance of such adapta
tion — and in this form is preserved in the ' Clef du
Caveau ' under the title of ' La Camargo.' [G.C.]
REBER, NAPOLEON -HENRI, born at Mul-
hausen, Oct. 21, 1807 ; at 20 entered the Conser
vatoire, studying counterpoint and fugue under
REBER.
Seuriot and Jelensperger, and composition unde?
Lesueur. His simple manners and refined tastes,
high sense of honour, and cultivated mind, gave
him the entree to salons where the conversation
turned on art and intellectual subjects, instead of
on the commonplaces of ordinary circles. This led
him to compose much chamber-music, and to set
poems by the best French poets of the period.
The success of these elegant and graceful works
induced him to attempt symphony and opera.
His music to the 2nd act of the charming ballet
'Le Diable amoureux' (Sept. 23, 1840) excited
considerable attention, and was followed at the
OpeVa-Comique by 'La Nuit de Noel,' 3 acts
(Feb. 9, 1848), ' Le Pere Gaillard,' 3 acts (Sept.
7, 1852), ' Les Papillotes de M. Benolt,' I act
(Dec. 28, 1853), and 'Les Dames Capitaines'
3 acts (June 3, 1857). In these works he strove
to counteract the tendency towards noise and
bombast then so prevalent both in French and
Italian opera, and to show how much may be
made out of the simple natural materials of the
old French ope'ra-comique by the judicious use
of modern orchestration.
In 1851 he was appointed Professor of har
mony at the Conservatoire, and in 1853 the
well-merited success of ' Le Pere Gaillard ' pro
cured his election to the Institut as Onslow's
successor. Soon after this he renounced the
theatre, and returned to chamber-music He
also began to write on music, and his 'Trait£
d' Harmonic ' (1862), now in its 3rd edition, is
without comparison the best work of its kind
in France. The outline is simple and methodical,
the classification of the chords easy to follow and
well-connected, the explanations luminously clear,
the exercises practical and well calculated to
develop musical taste — in a word, everything
combines to make it the safest and most valuable
of instruction-books. The second part especially,
dealing with ' accidental ' notes — or, notes foreign
to the constitution of chords — contains novel
views, and observations throwing light upon
points and rules of harmony which before were
obscure and confused.
In 1862 M. Reber succeeded 'HaleVy as Pro
fessor of composition at the Conservatoire ; since
1871 he was also Inspector of the succursales or
branches of the Conservatoire. He died in Paris,
after a short illness, Nov. 24, 1880, and was
succeeded as Professor by M. Saint-Saens.
His compositions comprise 4 symphonies, a
quintet and 3 quartets for strings, I PF. ditto,
7 trios, duets for PF. and violin, and PF.
pieces for 2 and 4 hands. Portions of his ballet
' Le Diable amoureux ' have been published for
orchestra, and are performed at concerts. In
1875 he produced a cantata called ' Roland,' but
'Le Me"netrier h la cour/ ope'ra-comique, and
' Nairn,' grand opera in 5 acts, have never been
performed, though the overtures are engraved.
His best vocal works are his melodies for a single
voice, but he has composed choruses for 3 and 4
men's voices, and some sacred pieces.
There is an admirable portrait of this dis
tinguished composer by Henri Lehmann. [G.C.]
*
jr»*
RECITAL.
RECITAL, a term which has come into use
in England to signify a performance of solo music
by one instrument and one performer. It was
probably first used by Liszt at his performance
at the Hanover Square Rooms, June 9, 1840,
though as applying to the separate pieces and
not to the whole performance. The 'advertise
ment of the concert in question says that
'M. Liszt will give Recitals on the Pianoforte
of the following pieces.' The name has since been
adopted by Mr. Charles Halle and others.
The term Opera Recital is used for a concert
in which the music of an opera is sung without
costume or acting. [G.]
RECITATIVE (Ital. Recitative; Germ. Re-
citativ; Fr. Rtcitatif; from the Latin recitare).
A species of declamatory Music, extensively
used in those portions of an Opera, an Oratorio,
or a Cantata, in which the action of the Drama
is too rapid, or the sentiment of the Poetry too
changeful, to adapt itself to the studied rhythm
of a regularly-constructed Aria.
The invention of Recitative marks a crisis in
the History of Music, scarcely less important
than that to which we owe the discovery of
Harmony. Whether the strange conception in
which it originated was first clothed in tangible
form by Jacopo Peri, or Emilio del Cavaliere,
is a question which has never been decided.
There is, however, little doubt, that both these
bold revolutionists assisted in working out the
theory upon which that conception was based ;
for, both are known to have been members of
that aesthetic brotherhood, which met in Flo
rence during the later years of the i6th century,
at the house of Giovanni Bardi, for the purpose
of demonstrating the possibility of a modern
revival of the Classic Drama, in its early purity ;
and it is certain that the discussions in which
they then took part led, after a time, to the
invention of the peculiar style of Music we are
now considering. The question, therefore, nar
rows itself to one of priority of execution only.
Now, the earliest specimens of true Recitative
we possess are to be found in Peri's Opera,
'Euridice,' and Emilio's Oratorio, 'LaRappre-
sentazione dell' Anima e del Corpo,' both printed
in the year 1600. The Oratorio was first pub
licly performed in the February of that year, at
Rome : the Opera>, in December, at Florence.
But Peri had previously written another Opera,
' Dafhe,' in exactly the same style, and caused
it to be privately performed, at the Palazzo
Corsi, in Florence, in 1597. Emilio del Cava
liere, too, is known to have written at least
three earlier pieces — 'II Satiro/ 'La Dispera-
zione di Fileno,' and 'II Giuoco della Cieca.'
No trace of either of these can now be found :
and, in our doubt as to whether they may not
have contained true Recitatives, we can scarcely
do otherwise than ascribe the invention to Peri,
who certainly did use them in ' Dafhe,' and
whose style is, moreover, far more truly de
clamatory than the laboured and half rhythmic
manner of his possible rival. [See OPERA, vol. ii.
498-500 ; ORATORIO, vol. ii. 534, 535.]
RECITATIVE.
83
Thus first launched upon the world, for the
purpose of giving a new impetus to the progress
of Art, this particular Style of Composition has
undergone less change, during the last 280 years,
than any other. What Simple or Unaccom
panied Recitative (Recitative secco) is to-day, it
was, in all essential particulars, in the time of
' Euridice.5 Then, as now, it was supported by
an unpretentious Thorough-Bass (Basso con-
tinuo), figured, in order that the necessary Chords
might be filled in upon the Harpsichord, or
Organ, without the addition of any kind of Sym
phony, or independent Accompaniment. Then,
as now, its periods were moulded with reference
to nothing more than the plain rhetorical de
livery of the words to which they were set ;
melodious or rhythmic phrases being everywhere
carefully avoided, as not only unnecessary, but
absolutely detrimental to the desired effect — so
detrimental, that the difficulty of adapting good
Recitative to Poetry written in short rhymed
verses is almost insuperable, the jingle of the
metre tending to crystallise itself in regular form
with a persistency which is rarely overcome ex
cept by the greatest Masters. Hence it is, that
the best Poetry for Recitative is Blank Verse :
and hence it is, that the same Intervals, the
same Progressions, and the same Cadences, have
been used over and over again, by Composers,
who, in other matters, have scarcely a trait in
common. We shall best illustrate this by select
ing a few set forms from the inexhaustible store
at our command, and shewing how these have
been used by some of the greatest writers of the
1 7th, 1 8th, and I9th centuries: premising that,
in phrases ending with two or more reiterated
notes, it has been long the custom to sing the
first as an Appoggiatura, a note higher than the
rest. We have shewn this in three cases, but
the rule applies to many others.
(a)
Typical forms.
(&) (c)
N N
Ihrc^hH
^
^
I
(a)
Examples of their occurrence.
PERI (1600). (a) CAVALIERE (1600).
£S
tntt
tt
chetra pungenti spini.
se fu meglior pen-siero.
6 ft
CARISSIMI (16 — ).
in victo -
(Sunp) Is - ra - el.
3E*£
G2
RECITATIVE.
RECITATIVE.
(b) CARISSIMI.
, ROSSINT
(a) ^^jt^:^?: m +.-p. (c) |g»--*- -*- . (1816).
cur e - go te Pa - ter de - ce - pi ?
vediam cosa scrive. S'apre il bal - cone.
•"">' ^ ' .f-. ||
-^ p= j2 (|:
^-b^~ »-•- — p- — -B
«i
J. S. BACH (1734).
• •«• •
? ^— IP — —F~U
b *
(6) (C) SPOHR(i8l3).
i Srlffr:
gs-^t-^ u p M-5-^ -s— *-,-
^~&~ — P"^^^* 1 1 - h "i g i* P F s*~^~~p — j=- — » — H
S3Z ' * 1 II ^
they re- j oiced ex - ceedingly (Suns) ceed-ing-ly.
— 1=— ^ —VJ~ P ^ ^ — P-
war das mein Ziel ? was Hohes du ersonnen !
"^~JZ 5 8~
'e $
('•)
i
1 • T f^"" n"f— ^ r- ' i* 1 J|
(6) MENDELSSOHN (1836).
7T~f- '1* ' 'm im — JT~ff«~r~|~~P '
— = — B-
which shall be to all the people
.r "1-f \> £— f • ff*— I (^ " B
in Temples made with hands.
*"p 1 n —
-1^ 11
ft d tf
(«) (*)
— F — H •
*
HANDEL (1713).
3 — )?«;, . j ^ • -|
6 B J
^>— ^
^ "k^^r — £zp~j*~L~ihr'~ivL
Witt"-, r=-fl
/f' — * — sr — sr= — jT~«ji» F=
il nemi - co trascorre A mi dunque Agi- lea ?
and did nei - ther eat, nor drink.
b 5
-. («) HAYDN (1798).
gg: p=3qp4fr_p-^-H -tut*-
•*}'- — ' 3}*-^ F H 1
i i f *5
(a) . p . WAGNER (i«47).
tff— i*-* p£fcE5E=EBi==!^=fc=
praising God, and say -ing:— (Sttnj) say -ing.
*^ m6g' Gott bei dei - nem Schwerte stehn!
6 *
-f—~ H—
7
<6)
He made the stars at - so.
'^—^~ -&- -- ^— — =B-
so oft aus Os - ten traf?
— ' ' 1 J_L U
* i *
,} (a) (c) MOZART (1786).
^ #
(o)
Q -p- -*-'•»- m -*• /7\
che carta 6 quella ? Se il conte viene
.r\: S« . ... ^^ 0 <^ ~ • — i n
er - scheine hier zur Stell'.
3^ ;=5^==t-
1^=. ^-^
__Q (a) (<-') BEETHOVEN (i«o<).
The universal acceptance of these, and similar
figures, by Composers of all ages, from Peri down
to Wagner, sufficiently proves their fitness for
the purpose for which they were originally de
signed. But, the staunch conservatism of Red-
tativo secco goes even farther than this. Its Ac
companiment has never changed. The latest
Composers who have employed it have trusted,
for its support, to the simple .Basso continuo,
which neither Peri, nor Carissimi, nor Handel,
nor Mozart, cared to reinforce by the introduction
Ich murre nicht! besSnftigt wallt
mein Blut. etc.
3 p — -=j — M i r- LP-
- — If51" Hj* — B
§ *
'I V'
RECITATIVE.
of a fuller Accompaniment. The only modifi
cation of the original idea which has found
favour in modern times has been the substitution
of Arpeggios, played by the principal Violoncello,
for the Harmonies formerly filled in upon the
Harpsichord, or Organ — and we believe we are
right in asserting that this device has never been
extensively adopted in any other country than
our own. Here it ppevailed exclusively for many
years. A return has however lately been made
to the old method by the employment of the
Piano, first by Mr. Otto Goldschmidt at a per
formance of Handel's L' Allegro in 1863, and
more recently by Dr. Stainer, at St. Paul's, in
various Oratorios.
Again, this simple kind of Recitative is as
free, now, as it was in the first year of the 1 7th
century, from the trammels imposed by the laws
of Modulation. It is the only kind of Music
which need not begin and end in the same Key.
As a matter of fact, it usually begins upon some
Chord not far removed from the Tonic Harmony
of the Aria, or Concerted Piece, which preceded
it ; and ends in, or near, the Key of that which is
to follow : but its intermediate course is governed
by no law whatever beyond that of euphony.
Its Harmonies exhibit more variety, now, than
they did two centuries ago ; but they are none
the less free to wander wherever they please,
passing through one Key after another, until
they land the hearer somewhere in the immediate
neighbourhood of the Key chosen for the next
regularly-constructed Movement. Hence it is,
that Recitatives of this kind are always written
without the introduction of Sharps, or Flats, at
the Signature ; since it is manifestly more con
venient to employ any number of Accidentals
that may be needed, than to place three or four
Sharps at the beginning of a piece which is
perfectly at liberty to end in seven Flats.
But, notwithstanding the unchangeable cha
racter of Becitativo secco, declamatory Music has
not been relieved from the condition which im
poses progress upon every really living branch
of Art. As the resources of the Orchestra in
creased, it became evident that they might be no
less profitably employed, in the Accompaniment
of highly impassioned Recitative, than in that
of the Aria, or Chorus : and thus arose a new
style of Rhetorical Composition, called Accom
panied Recitative (Eecitativo stromentato), in
which the vocal phrases, themselves unchanged,
received a vast accession of power, by means of
elaborate Orchestral Symphonies interpolated
between them, or even by instrumental passages
designed expressly for their support. The in
vention of this new form of impassioned Mono
logue is generally ascribed to Alessandro Scar
latti (1659-1725), who used it with admirable
effect, both in his Operas and his Cantatas ;
but its advantages, in telling situations, were so
obvious, that it was immediately adopted by
other Composers, and at once recognised as a
legitimate form of Art — not, indeed, as a sub
stitute for Simple Recitative, which has always
been retained for the ordinary business of the
RECITATIVE.
85
Stage, but, as a means of producing powerful
effects, in Scenes, or portions of Scenes, in which
the introduction of the measured Aria would
be out of place.
It will be readily understood, that the sta
bility of Simple Recitative was not communicable
to the newer style. The steadily increasing
weight of the Orchestra, accompanied by a
correspondent increase of attention to Orchestral
Effects, exercised an irresistible influence over
it. Moreover, time has proved it to be no
less sensitive to changes of School, and Style,
than the Aria itself ; whence it frequently happens
that a Composer may be as easily recognised by
his Accompanied Recitatives as by his regularly-
constructed Movements. Scarlatti's Accompani
ments exhibit a freedom of thought immeasur
ably in advance of the age in which he lived.
Sebastian Bach's Recitatives, though priceless,
as Music, are more remarkable for the beauty of
their Harmonies, than for that spontaneity of
expression which is rarely attained by Composers
unfamiliar with the traditions of the Stage.
Handel's, on the contrary, though generally
based upon the simplest possible harmonic found
ation, exhibit a rhetorical perfection of which
the most accomplished Orator might well feel
proud : and we cannot doubt that it is to this
high quality, combined with a never-failing
truthfulness of feeling, that so many of them
owe their deathless reputation — to the unfair
exclusion of many others, of equal worth, which
still lie hidden among the unclaimed treasures of
his long-forgotten Operas. Scarcely less success
ful, in his own peculiar style, was Haydn, whose
' Creation ' and ' Seasons,' owe half their charm
to their pictorial Recitatives. Mozart was so
uniformly great, in his declamatory passages,
that it is almost impossible to decide upon their
comparative merits ; though he has certainly
never exceeded the perfection of ' Die Weiselehre
dieser Knaben,' or ' Non temer.' Beethoven at
tained his highest flights in ' Abscheulicher ! wo
eilst du hin ? ' and ' Ah, perfido ! ' Spohr, in
'Faust,' and 'Die letzten Dinge.' Weber, in
' Der Freischutz.' The works of Cimarosa, Ros
sini, and Cherubini, abound in examples of Ac
companied Recitative, which rival their Airs in
beauty : and it would be difficult to point out
any really great Composer who has failed to
appreciate the value of Scarlatti's happy in
vention.
Yet, even this invention failed, either to meet
the needs of the Dramatic Composer, or to ex
haust his ingenuity. It was reserved for Gluck
to strike out yet another form of Recitative,
destined to furnish a more powerful engine for
the production of a certain class of effects than
any that had preceded it. He it was, who first
conceived the idea of rendering the Orchestra,
and the Singer, to all outward appearance, en
tirely independent of each other : of filling the
Scene, so to speak, with a finished orchestral
groundwork, complete in itself, and needing no
vocal Melody to enhance its interest, while the
Singer declaimed his part in tones, which, however
86
RECITATIVE.
artfully combined with the Instrumental Har
mony, appeared to have no connection with it
whatever ; the resulting effect resembling that
which would be produced, if, during the inter
pretation of a Symphony, some accomplished
Singer were to soliloquise, aloud, in broken
sentences, in such wise as neither to take an
ostensible share in the performance, nor to
disturb it by the introduction of irrelevant
discord. An early instance of this may be
found in 'Orfeo.' After the disappearance of
Euridice, the Orchestra plays an excited Cres
cendo, quite complete in itself, during the course
of which Orfeo distractedly calls his lost Bride,
by name, in tones which harmonise with the
Symphony, yet have not the least appearance of
belonging to it. In 'Iphigenie en Tauride,'
and all the later Operas, the same device is
constantly adopted ; and modern Composers have
also used it, freely — notably Spohr, who opens
his 'Faust' with a Scene, in which a Band
behind the stage plays the most delightful of
Minuets, while Faust and Mephistopheles sing
an ordinary Recitative, accompanied by the usual
Chords played by the regular Orchestra in front.
By a process of natural, if not inevitable
development^ this new style led to another, in
which the Recitative, though still distinct from
the Accompaniment, assumed a more measured
tone, less melodious than that of the Air, yet
more so, by far, than that used for ordinary
declamation. Gluck has used this peculiar kind
of Mezzo Recitativo with indescribable power, in
the Prison Scene, in ' Iphigdnie en Tauride.'
Spohr employs it freely, almost to the exclusion
of symmetrical Melody, in ' Die letzten Dinge.'
Wagner makes it his cheval de bataitle, intro
ducing it everywhere, and using it, as an ever-
ready medium, for the production of some of his
most powerful Dramatic Effects. We have al
ready discussed his theories on this subject, so
fully, that it is unnecessary to revert to them
here. [See OPERA, vol. ii. pp. 526-529.] Suffice
it to say that his Melos, though generally pos
sessing all the more prominent characteristics of
pure Recitative, sometimes approaches so nearly
to the rhythmic symmetry of the Song, that— -
as in the case of ' Nun sei bedankt, mein lieben
Schwann ! ' — it is difficult to say, positively, to
which class it belongs. We may, therefore, fairly
accept this as the last link in the chain which
fills up the long gap between simple 'Recitative
secco,' and the finished Aria. [W.S.R.]
RECITING-NOTE (Lat. Kepercussio, Nota
dominans). A name sometimes given to that
important note, in a Gregorian Tone, on which
the greater portion of every Verse of a Psalm, or
Canticle, is continuously recited.1
As this particular note invariably corresponds
with the Dominant of the Mode in which the
Psalm-Tone is written, the terms, Dominant, and
Reciting-Note, are frequently treated as inter-
i In accordance with this definition, the term should also be ap
plied to the first notes of the first and third sections of a Double
Ohaunt ; but, as the selection of these notes is subject to no rule
whatever, the word is very rarely used in connection with them.
RECORDER.
changeable. [See MODES, THE ECCLESIASTICAL,
vol. ii. p. 342.] The Reciting-Notes of the first
eight Tones, therefore, will be A, F, C, A, C, A,
D, and C, respectively.
The Reciting-Note makes its appearance twice,
in the course of every Tone : first, as the initial
member of the Intonation, and, afterwards, as
that of the Ending; as shewn in the following
example, in which it is written, each time, in the
form of a Large.
Tone I.
The only exception to the general rule is to be
found in the Tonus Peregrinus (or Irregularis),
in which the true Dominant of the Ninth Mode
(E) is used for the first Reciting-Note, and D
for the second.
The Reciting-Notes of Tones III, V, VII, VIII,
and IX, are so high that they cannot be sung, at
their true pitch, without severely straining the
Voice ; in practice, therefore, these Tones are
almost always transposed. An attempt has been
sometimes made so to arrange their respective
pitches as to let one note — generally A — serve
for all. This plan may, perhaps, be found practi
cally convenient : but it shews very little concern
for the expression of the words, which cannot but
suffer, if the jubilant phrases of one Psalm are to
be recited on exactly the same note as the almost
despairing accents of another. [W. S. R.]
RECORDER. An instrument of the flute
family, now obsolete. Much fruitless ingenuity
has been exercised as to the etymology of the
name ; a specimen of which may be seen in
the Pictorial Edition of Shakespeare, on the
passage in Hamlet, Act iii, Sc. 2. The English
verb ' to record ' may be referred to the Latin
root Cor. ' Recordare Jesu pie ' forms the opening
of one of the hymns of the ancient church, em
bodied in the requiem or funeral mass. Here
it has simply the sense of ' to remember ' 2 or ' to
take note of — a signification which has descended
to the modern words Records and Recorder. But
there was evidently from early times a parallel
meaning of ' to sing, chant,' or ' to warble like
birds.' This appears plainly in the beautiful
passage of Shakespeare 3 —
To the lute
She sang, and made the night-bird mute
That still records with moan.
' To record,' says an old writer, ' among fowlers,
is when the bird begins to tune or sing within
itself.'
It is possibly from this that the name of the
instrument is derived. In any case it appears
in one of the ' proverbis ' written about Henry
VII. 's time on the walls of the manor house
at Leckingfield. It is there said to 'desire'
the mean part, ' but manifold fingering and stops
bringeth high notes from its clear tones.' In the •
catalogue of instruments left by Henry VIII. are
Recorders of box, oak, and ivory, great and
2 Compare the expression, 'to get by heart.'
3 Pericles, Act. iv.
RECORDER.
small, two base Recorders of walnut, and one
great base Recorder.
The passage in Hamlet referring to the instru
ment (Act iii. Sc. 2), is well known, and in the
Midsummer Night's Dream, Shakespeare says :
' He hath played on his prologue like a child on
a recorder.' Sir Philip Sidney describes how 'the
shepherds, pulling out recorders, which possessed
the place of pipes, accorded their music to the
others' voice.' Bacon, in the Sylva Sylvarum,
Century III. 221, goes a.t length into the mechan
ism of the instrument. He says it is straight,
and has a lesser and a greater bore both above
and below ; that it requires very little breath
from the blower, and that it has what he calls
a ' fipple ' or stopper. He adds that ' the three
uppermost holes yield one tone, which is a note
lower than the tone of the first three.' This last
paragraph begets a suspicion that the learned
writer was not practically acquainted with the
method of playing this instrument. Milton1
speaks of
The Dorian mood
Of flutes and soft recorders.
But the most definite information we possess
as to the instrument is derived from two similar
works published respectively in 1683 and 1686.
The former is named ' The Genteel Companion,
being exact directions for the Recorder, with a
collection of the best and newest tunes and
grounds extant. Carefully composed and gathered
by Humphrey Salter, London. Printed for
Richard Hunt and Humphrey Salter at the
Lute in St. Paul's Churchyard, 1683.' The latter
is entitled ' The delightful Companion, or choice
New Lessons for the Recorder or Flute, etc.
London : printed for John Playford at his shop
near the Temple Church, and for John Carr at
his shop at the Middle Temple Gate 1 686. Second
edition corrected.'
The first of these works has a frontispiece show
ing a lady and gentleman sitting at a table, with
two music books; the gentleman, with his legs
gracefully crossed, is playing a recorder. The
lower end rests on his knee, and the flageolet-
shaped mouthpiece at the top end is between
his lips. The book describes the peculiarity of
the instrument, from which Mr. Chappell considers
the name to have been derived — namely, a hole
situated in the upper part, between the mouth
piece and the top hole for the fingers, and ap
parently covered with thin bladder, or what is
now termed 'goldbeater's skin,' with a view of
affecting the quality of tone. Two scales or
gamuts are given in the usual G clef, the former
containing 13, the other 16 notes. The lowest
note in both cases is F, and the highest is D in
the first case, and G in the second. There is no
RECTE ET RETRO.
87
evidence of any keys for producing semitones,
which are shown by the scales to have been
i Paradise Lost, i. 550.
obtained by cross-fingering. The keys in which
the tunes are set comprise C, with G, D and A
on the sharp side, F and Bb on the flat side.
The edition of 'The delightful Companion'
printed three years later gives very explicitly the
number of holes, but omits mention of the closed
intermediate orifice. It will be remarked that
' Recorder ' and ' Flute ' are used synonymously
on this title-page. ' Observe', says the writer,
' there is eight holes upon the pipe, viz. seven
before, and one underneath which we call the
uppermost, and is to be stopped with your
thumb, the next with your forefinger,' etc. Cross-
fingerings are here also given to produce the
first two or there intermediate semitones on
either side of the natural key.
Mr. Chappell quotes the late Mr. Ward as his
authority for having seen ' old English flutes '
with a hole bored through the side in the upper
part of the instrument, and covered with a thin
piece of skin. An English Recorder of the 1 7th
century was shown in the Loan Exhibition of
Musical Instruments at South Kensington. It
was 26 inches in length — agreeing well with
the frontispiece of the Genteel Companion — and
therefore not at all like the little pipe usually
brought on the stage in Hamlet. Near the top,
about an inch from the mouth-hole, it was fur
nished with a hole covered with thin bladder as
above described. [W.H.S.]
RECTE ET RETRO, PER (Imitatio can-
crizans, Imitatio per Motum retrogradum, Imi
tatio recurrens ; Ital. Imitazione al Rovescio, o
alia River sa ; Eng. Retrograde Imitation).
A peculiar kind of Imitation, so constructed
that the melody may be sung backwards as well
as forwards ; as shewn in the following Two-
Part Canon, which must be sung, by the First
Voice, from left to right, and by the Second,
from right to left, both beginning together, but
at opposite ends of the Music.
J
3
:|=t=
The earliest known instances of Retrograde
Imitation are to be found among the works of
the Flemish Composers of the I5th century, who
delighted in exercising their ingenuity, not only
upon the device itself, but also upon the Inscrip
tions prefixed to the Canons in which it was
employed. The Netherlanders were not, however,
the only Musicians who indulged successfully in
this learned species of recreation. Probably the
most astonishing example of it on record is the
Motet,2 ' Diliges Dominum,' written by William
Byrd for four voices — Treble, Alto, Tenor, and
Bass — and transmuted into an 8 -part composition,
by adding a Second Treble, Alto, Tenor, and Bass,
formed by singing the four First Parts backwards.
It is scarcely possible to study this complication
attentively, without feeling one's brain turn
2 Keprinted by Hawkins, 'History.' ch. 96.
88
RECTE ET RETRO.
giddy ; yet, strange to say, the effect produced
is less curious than beautiful.
There is little doubt that the idea of singing
music from right to left was first suggested by those
strange Oracular Verses1 which may be read either
backwards or forwards, without injury to words
or metre; such as the well-known Pentameter —
Roma tibi subito motibus ibit amor.
or the cry of the Evil Spirit
In girum imus noctu ecce ut consuminiur igni.
The Canons were frequently constructed in exact
accordance with the method observed in these
curious lines ; and innumerable quaint conceits
were invented, for the purpose of giving the
Singers some intimation of the manner in which
they were to be read. ' Canit more Hebraeorum'
was a very common Motto. ' Misericordia et ver-
itas obviaverunt sibi ' indicated that the Singers
were to begin at opposite ends, and meet in the
middle. In the Second ' Agnus Dei ' of his ' Missa
Grsecorum,' Hobrecht wrote, 'Aries vertatur in
Pisces ' — Aries being the first Sign of the Zodiac,
and Pisces the last. In another part of the same
Masshehasgivenafarmore mysterious direction —
Tu tenor cancriza et per antifrasin canta,
Cum furcis in capite antifrasizando repete.
RECTE ET EETRO.
This introduces us to a new complication ; the
secret of the Motto being, that the Tenor is not
only to sing backwards, but to invert the inter
vals ('per antifrasin canta'), until he reaches
the ' Horns ' — that is to say, the two cusps of
the semicircular Time-Signature — after which he
is to sing from left to right, though still continu
ing to invert the Intervals. This new Device, in
which the Intervals themselves are reversed, as
well as the sequence of the notes, is called ' Retro
grade Inverse Imitation ' (Lat. Imitatio cancri-
zans motu contrario ; Ital. Imitazione al contrario
riverso). It might have been thought that this
would have contented even Flemish ingenuity.
But, it did not. The Part-Books had not yet
been turned upside down ! In the subjoined
example, we have endeavoured to show, in an
humble way, the manner in which this most
desirable feat may also be accomplished. The
two Singers, standing face to face, hold the book
between them ; one looking at it from the ordin
ary point of view, the other, upsidedown, and both
reading from left to right — that is to say, begin
ning at opposite ends. The result, if not strikingly
beautiful, is, at least, not inconsistent with the
laws of Counterpoint.
tuna -
'saj - aaS sau - mo
saurao 'ranuimod
j - vp -
Lau-da-te Dominum, om - nes gen - tes, om - nes gen - tes, lau-da-te Do -mi -num.
This species of Imitation was indicated by the
Inscriptions, ' Respice me, ostende mihi faciem
tuam,' ' Duo adversi adverse in unum,' and others
equally obscure. The last-named Motto graces
Morton's 'Salve Mater' — a triumph of ingenuity
which, no doubt, was regarded, in its time, as an
Art-Treasure of inestimable value. The style
was, indeed, for a long time, exceedingly popular ;
and, even as late as 1690, Angiplo Berardi thought
it worth while to give full directions, in his
'Arcani Musicali,' for the manufacture of Canons
of this description, though the true artistic feel
ing — to say nothing of the plain common-sense —
of the School of Palestrina had long since banished
them, not only from the higher kinds of Eccle
siastical Music, but from the Polyphonic ' Chan
son ' also. This reform, however, was not effected
without protest. There were learned Composers,
even in the ' Golden Age,' who still clung to the
traditions of an earlier epoch ; and, among them,
Francesco Suriano, the Second ' Agnus Dei ' of
whose Missa ' Super voces musicales ' contains
a Canon, with the Inscription, ' Justitia et Pax
osculatee sunt,' in which the Guida, formed on
the six sounds of the Hexachordon durum, is
sung, by the First Tenor, in the usual way, and
in the Alto Clef, while the Cantus Secundus re
plies, reading from the same copy, in the Treble
Clef, backwards, and upsidedown. But, in this
instance, the simple notes of the Guida are ac-
i Versus recurrentes, said to have been first invented by the
Greek Poet, Sotades. during the reign of Ptolemy Philadelphus. The
examples we have quoted are, however, of much later date ; the
oldest of them being certainly not earlier than the 7th century.
companied by six 'Free Parts,' by the skilful
management of which the Composer has pro
duced an effect well worthy of his reputation.2
Retrograde Imitation has survived, even to our
own day ; and, in more than one very popular
form. In the year 1791. Haydn wrote, for his
Doctor's Degree, at the University of Oxford, a
'Canon cancrizans, a tre' ('Thy Voice, 0 Har
mony') which will be found in vol. i. p. 7106;
and he has also used the same Device, in the
Minuet of one of his Symphonies. Some other
modern Composers have tried it, with less happy
effect. But, perhaps it has never yet appeared
in a more popular form than that of the well-
known Double Chaunt by Dr. Crotch.
XI "~"^ C^-i*' ,-— ? II I
EH F^ ^ -^
E:
V^U 1 H •— ' 'TJ ,-J
— II
-^3 ^ "" ^- '
, i
^ P 0 , P 1
_
It would be difficult to point to two Schools
more bitterly opposed to each other than those of
the early Netherlanders, and the English Cathe
dral writers of the I9th century. Yet, here we
see an Artifice, invented by the former, and used
by one of the latter, so completely con amore,
that, backed by the Harmonies peculiar to the
modern 'free style,' it has attained a position
quite unassailable, and will probably last as long
as the Anglican Chaunt itself shall continue in
2 The entire Mass is reprinted, from the original edition of 1609, in
vol. i. of Proske's ' Selectus novus Missarum ' ; and the Canon is there
shewn, both in its senigmatical form, and in its complete resolution.
RECTE ET EETRO.
use. With this fact before us, we shall d6 well
to pause, before we consign even the most
glaring pedantries of our forefathers to obli
vion. [W.S.R.]
REDEKER, LOUISE DORETTE AUGUSTE, a
contralto singer, who made her first appearance
iu London at the Philharmonic Concert of June
IQ, 1876, and remained a great favourite until
she retired from public life on her marriage,
Oct. 19, 1879. She was born at Duingen, Han
over, Jan. 19, 1853, and from 1870 to 73
studied in the Conservator! um at Leipzig, chiefly
under Konewka. She sang first in public at
Bremen in 1873. In 1874 she made the first
of several appearances at the Gewandhaus, and
was much in request for concerts and oratorios
in Germany and other countries during 74 and 75.
In England she sang at all the principal concerts,
and at the same time maintained her connexion
with the Continent, where she was always well
received. Her voice is rich and sympathetic ; she
sings without effort and with great taste. [G.]
REDFORD, JOHN, was organist and almoner,
and master of the Choristers of • St. Paul's
Cathedral in the latter part of the reign of
Henry VIII (1491-1547). Tusser, the author
of the 'Hundred good points of Husbandrie' was
one of his pupils. An anthem, 'Rejoice in the
Lorde alway,' printed in the appendix to Haw
kins's History and in the Motett Society's
first volume, is remarkable for its melodv and
' V
expression. Some anthems and organ pieces by
him are in the MS. volume collected by Thomas
Mulliner, master of St. Paul's School, afterwards
in the libraries of John Stafford Smith and
Dr. Rimbault, and now in the British Museum.
A motet, some fancies and a voluntary by him
are in MS. at Christ Church, Oxford. His
name is included by Morley in the list of those
whose works he consulted for his ' Introduc
tion.' [W.H.H.]
REDOUTE. Public assemblies at which the
guests appeared with or without masks at
pleasure. The word is French, and is explained
by Voltaire and Littre' as being derived from the
Italian ridotto — perhaps with some analogy to
the word 'resort.' The building used for the
purpose in Vienna, erected in 1748, and rebuilt
in stone in 1754, forms part of the Burg or
Imperial Palace, the side of the oblong facing
the Josephs-Platz. There was a grosse and a
Meine Redoutensaal. In the latter Beethoven
played a concerto of his own at a concert
of Haydn's, Dec. 18, 1795. The rooms were
used for concerts till within the last ten years.
The masked balls were held there during the
Carnival, from Twelfth Night to Shrove Tuesday,
and occasionally in the weeks preceding Advent ;
some being public, i. e. open to all on payment of
an entrance fee, and others private. Special nights
were reserved for the court and the nobility. The
'Redoutentanze' — Minuets. Allemandes, Contre-
danses, Schottisches, Anglaises, and Landler —
were composed for full orchestra, and published
REED.
89
(mostly by Artaria) for pianoforte. * Mozart,
Haydn, 2 Beethoven, Hummel, Woelfl, Gyrowetz,
and others, have left dances written for this pur
pose. Under the Italian form of Ridotto, the
term was much employed in England in the last
century. [C.F.P.]
REDOWA, a Bohemian dance which was
introduced into Paris in 1846 or 47, and quickly
attained for a short time great popularity, both
there and in London, although now seldom
danced. In Bohemia there are two variations
of the dance, the Rejdovak, in 3-4 or 3-8 time,
which is more like a waltz, and the Rejdovacka,
in 2-4 time, which is something like a polka.
The following words are usually sung to the
dance in Bohemian villages :
Kami nicht frei'n, well Eltern
Nicht ihr Jawort gaben :
Weil ich kommen k6nnte,
Wo kein Brot sie haben—
Wo kein Brot sie haben,
Keine Kuchen backen,
Wo kein Heu sie niahen
Und kein Brennholz hacken.
The ordinary Redowa is written in 3-4 time
(Maelzel's Metronome J = i6o). The dance
is something like a Mazurka, with the rhythm
less strongly marked. The following example is
part of a Rejdovak which is given in Kbhler's
' Volkstanze aller Nationen ' —
=e
~ i* - -
• •
— ^ • • . ii
— Ed_
• —
•
—\
• — i
=fH
[W.B.S.]
REED (Fr.Anche; Ital. Ancia ; Germ. Blatt,
Rolir*). The speaking part of many instruments,
both ancient and modern ; the name being de
rived from the material of which it has been
immemorialiy constructed. This is the outer
silicious layer of a tall grass, the Arundo Donax
or Sativa, growing in the South of Europe. The
substance in its rough state is commonly called
'cane,' though differing from real cane in many
respects. The chief supply is now obtained from
Frejus on the Mediterranean coast. Many other
materials, such as lance-wood, ivory, silver, and
' ebonite,' or hardened india-rubber, have been ex
perimentally substituted for the material first
named; but hitherto without success. Organ
reeds were formerly made of hard wood, more
recently of brass, German silver, and steel. The
name Reed is, however, applied by organ -builders
to the metal tube or channel against which the
1 See Kochel's Catalogue, Xo. 599. etc.
2 See Mottebohm's Thematic Catalogue. Section ii, pages 135— 1S7.
90
EEED.
vibrating tongue beats, rather than to the vibra
tor itself.
Reeds are divided into the Free and the
Beating ; the latter again into the Single and the
Double forms. The Free reed is used in the
harmonium and concertina, its union with Beat
ing reeds in the organ not having proved success
ful. [See FREE-REED, vol. i. p. 562.] The vibra
tor, as its name implies, passes freely through
the long slotted brass plate to which it is adapted ;
the first impulse of the wind tending to push it
within the slot and thus close the aperture. In
'percussion' harmoniums the vibrator is set
suddenly in motion by a blow from a hammer
connected with the keyboard. [See HARMONIUM,
vol. i. p. 667 &.] The Beating reed is that
of the organ and clarinet. In this the edges
of the vibrator overlap the wind-passage so as
to beat against it. In the organ reed, how
ever, the brass tongue is burnished backwards
so as to leave a thin aperture between it
and the point of the channel against which it
strikes ; this the pressure of wind at first tends
to close, thus setting it in vibration. In the
clarinet, the reed is flat and spatula-like (hence
the German name JBltitt opposed to Bohr in
the oboe and bassoon), the mouthpiece being
curved backwards at the point to allow of vibra
tion. [See CLARINET.] The Double reed has
already been described under oboe and bassoon
[See OBOE ; BASSOON.] It is possible to replace
it in both these instruments by a single reed of
clarinet shape, beating against a small wooden
mouthpiece. The old Dolcino or Alto-fagotto
was so played in the band of the Coldstream
Guards by a great artist still living, Mr. Henry
Lazarus, when a boy. The double reed, however,
much improves the quality of tone, and gives
greater flexibility of execution to both the instru
ments named above. [W.H.S.]
REEDSTOP. When the pipes controlled by
a draw-stop produce their tone by means of a
vibrating reed, the stop is called a Reedstop;
when the pipes contain no such reeds, but their
tone is produced merely by the impinging of air
against a sharp edge, the stop is called a Flue-
stop. Any single pipe of the former kind is
called a Reed-pipe, any single pipe of the latter
kind, a Flue-pipe. Pipes containing Free reeds
are seldom used in English organs, but are
occasionally found in foreign instruments under
the name of Physharmonika, etc. [See REED.]
The reedstops consisting of ' striking-reeds ' are
voiced in various ways, to imitate the sounds of
the Oboe, Cor Anglais, Clarinet, Bassoon, Horn,
Cornopean, Trumpet, etc., all of which are of
8ft. pitch (that is, in unison with the diapason).
The Clarion 4-ft. is an octave-reedstop. The
Double Trumpet i6-ft. is a reedstop one octave
lower in pitch than the diapason ; it is also
called a Contra-posaune, or sometimes a Trom
bone. Reedstops of the trumpet class are often
placed on a very high pressure of wind under
such names as Tuba mirabilis, Tromba major,
etc. ; such high-pressure reedstops are generally
found on the Solo-manual ; the reedstops of the
REED.
Great organ being of moderate loudness ; those
on the Choir organ altogether of a softer cha
racter. A very much larger proportion of reed-
stops is usually assigned to the Swell organ
than to any other manual, owing to the brilliant
crescendo which they produce as the shutters of
the swell-box open. Reedstops are said to be
' harmonic ' when the tubes of the pipes are
twice their normal length and perforated half
way with a small hole. Their tone is remarkably
pure and brilliant. The best modern organ
builders have made great improvements in the
voicing of reedstops, which are now produced
in almost infinite variety both as to quality and
strength of tone. [J.S.]
REED, THOMAS GERMAN, born at Bristol
June 27, 1817. His father was a musician, and
the son first appeared, at the age of ten, at the
Bath Concerts as a PF. player with John Loder
and Lindley, and also sang at the Concerts and at
the Bath Theatre. Shortly after, he appeared at
the Haymarket Theatre, London, where his father
was conductor, as PF. player, singer, and actor
of juvenile parts. In 1832 the family moved to
London, and the father became leader of the
band at the Garrick Theatre. His son was his
deputy, and also organist to the Catholic Chapel,
Sloane Street. German Reed now entered eagerly
into the musical life of London, was an early
member of the Society of British Musicians,
studied bard at harmony, counterpoint, and PF.
playing, composed much, gave many lessons, and
took part in all the good music he met with. His
work at the theatre consisted in great measure
of scoring and adapting, and getting up new
operas, such as 'Fra Diavolo' in'i837. In 1838
he became Musical Director of the Haymarket
Theatre, a post which he retained till 1851. In
1838 he also succeeded Mr. Tom Cooke as Chapel-
master at the Royal Bavarian Chapel, where the
music to the Mass was for long noted both for
quality and execution. Beethoven's Mass in C
was produced there for the first time in England,
and the principal Italian singers habitually took
part in the Sunday services. At the Haymarket,
for the Shakespearian performances of Macready,
the Keans, the Cushmans, etc., he made many ex
cellent innovations, by introducing, as overtures
and entractes, good pieces, original or scored by
himself, instead of the rubbish usually played at
that date. During the temporary closing of the
theatre Reed did the work of producing Pacini's
opera of 'Sappho' at Drury Lane (April i. 1843
—Clara Novello, Sims Reeves, etc.). In 1844 he
married Miss Priscilla Horton, and for the next
few years pursued the same busy, useful, miscel
laneous life as before, directing the production of
English opera at the Surrey, managing Sadler's
Wells during a season of English opera, with his
wife, Miss Louisa Pyne, Harrison, etc., conduct
ing the music at the Olympic under Mr. Wigan's
management, and making prolonged provincial
tours.
In 1855 he started a new class of performance
which, under the name of ' Mr. and Mrs. German
Reed's Entertainment,' has made his name widely
REED.
KEEL.
91
and favourably known in England. Its object
was to provide good dramatic amusement for a
large class of society who, on various grounds,
objected to the theatres. It was opened at St.
Martin's Hall, April 2, 1855, as ' Miss P. Hor-
ton's Illustrative Gatherings,' with two pieces
called ' Holly Lodge ' and ' The Enraged Musi
cian' (after Hogarth), written by W. Brough, and
presented by Mrs. Heed, with the aid of her
husband only, as accompanyist and occasional
actor. In Feb. 1856 they removed to the Gallery
of Illustration, Regent Street, and there produced
'A Month from Home,' and 'My Unfinished
Opera' (April 27, 57) ; 'The Home Circuit' and
'SeasideStudies'(June20,59) — all by W. Brough;
'After the Ball,' by Edmund Yates ; ' Our Card
Basket,' by Shirley Brooks ; ' An Illustration on
Discord' ('The Rival Composers') by Brough
(Ap. 3, 61) ; and 'The Family Legend,' by Tom
Taylor (Mar. 31, 62). They then engaged Mr.
John Parry, and produced the following series
of pieces specially written for this company of
three, and including some of Mr. Parry's most
popular and admirable songs, in the characters of
Paterfamilias at the Pantomime, Mrs. Roseleaf,
etc., etc.
' The Charming Cottage.' Ap. 6,
1863.
' The Pyramid.' Shirley Brooks .
Feb. 7, 64.
'The Bard and his Birthday.'
W. Brough. Ap. 20, 64.
' The Peculiar family.' Do. Mar.
15, 65.
'The Yachting Cruise.' P. C.
Burnand. Ap. 2, 66.
•A Dream in Venice.' T. W.
Robertson. Mar. 18, 67.
' Our Quiet Chateau.' B. Beece.
Deo. 26. 67.
'Inquire within.' P. C. Bur
nand. July 22, 68.
' Last of the Paladins.' R. Keece.
Dec. 23, 68.
At this period the company was further in
creased by the addition of Miss Fanny Holland
and Mr. Arthur Cecil, and soon after by Mr.
Corney Grain and Mr. Alfred Reed. The follow
ing was the repertoire during this last period : —
' Lischen and Fritschen.' Offen
bach. Feb. 8. 59.
•No Cards,' W. S. Gilbert, and
' Cox and Box." Burnand and Sul
(A. Cecil's 1st
livan. Mar. 29, 69.
appearance.)
' Ages Ago.' W. S. Gilbert and
F. Clay. Nov. 22, 69.
'Beggar my Neighbour.' F. C.
Burnand. Mar. 28, 70.
' Our Island Home.' W. S. Gil
bert. June 20, 70.
•The Bold Becruit.' F. Clay.
July 19, 70.
'A Sensation Novel." Do. Jan.
30,71.
' Near Relations.' Arthur Sketch-
ley. Aug. 14, 71.
'King Christmas.' PIanch<5. Dec.
26, 71.
'Charity begins at Home.' B.
Bowe and Cellier. Feb. 7, 72.
'My Aunt's Secret.' Burnand
and Molloy. Mar. 3, 72.
'Happy Arcadia,' W. S. Gilbert
and F. Clay. Oct. 28, 72.
' Very Catching.' Burnand and
Molloy. Nov. 18, 72.
' Mildred's Well.' Burnand and
German Beed. May 5, 73.
When the lease of the Gallery of Illustration
expired, the entertainment was transferred to
St. George's Hall, and there the following enter
tainments were produced : —
'He's Coming.' F. 0. Burnand
and German Reed.
' Too Many by One.' F. C. Bur-
nand and F. Cowan.
'The Three Tenants'; 'Ancient
Britons.' Gilbert a Beckett and
German Beed.
•A Tale of Old China.' F. 0.
Burnand and Molloy.
' Eyes and no Eyes.' W. B. GI1-
bert and German Reed.
' A Spanish Bond '; 'An Indian
Puzzle'; 'The Wicked Duke.' Gil
bert a Beckett and German
Beed.
'Matched and Match.' F. C.
Burnand and German Reed.
' A Puff of Smoke.' 0. J. Rowe
and Mme. Goetz.
' Our Dolls' House." C. J. Rowe
and Cotsford Dick.
'A Night's Surprise.' West Cro-
mer and German Reed.
'Foster Brothers.' F. C. Bur
nand and King Hall.
' Happy Bungalow." A. Law.
During the Galley of Illustration period a diver
sion was made by the introduction of ' Opere di
Camera,' for four characters. These comprised : —
'Jessy Lea.' Oxenford and Mac- 'Widows bewitched.' Virginia
farren. Gabriel.
' Too Many Cooks.' Offenbach. ' A Fair Exchange ';' A Happy
'The Sleeping Beauty.' Balfe. Result'; 'Ching Chow Hi.' All
'The Soldier's Legacy.1 Oxen- three by Offenbach.
ford and Macfarren.
While the entertainment still remained at the
Gallery of Illustration, Reed became lessee of St.
George's Hall for the production of Comic Opera.
He engaged an orchestra of 40 and a strong
chorus, and ' The Contraband! sta' (Burnand and
Sullivan), 'L'Ambassadrice' (Auber), 'Ching
Chow Hi' and the 'Beggar's Opera1 were pro
duced, but without the necessary success. Mr.
Reed then gave his sole attention to the Gallery
of Illustration, in which he has been uniformly
successful, owing to the fact that he has carried
out his entertainments, not only with perfect
respectability, but always with great talent, much
tact and judgment, and constant variety.
His brothers, ROBERT HOPKB and WILLIAM,
are violoncello players; Robert has been Principal .
Cello in the Crystal Palace Band for many years.
MRS. GERMAN REED, nde PRISCILLA HORTON,
was born at Birmingham, Jan. I, 1818. From a
very early age she showed unmistakable qualifi
cations for a theatrical career, in a fine strong
voice, great musical ability, and extraordinary
power of mimicry. She made her first appearance
at the age of ten, at the Surrey Theatre, under
Elliston's management, as the Gipsy Girl in 'Guy
Mannering.' After this she was constantly en
gaged at the principal metropolitan theatres in
a very wide range of parts. Her rare combination
of great ability as a singer, with conspicuous gifts
as an actress, and moat attractive appearance,
led to a very satisfactory step in her career. On
Aug. 16, 1837, she signed an agreement with
Mr. Macready for his famous performances at
Covent Garden and Drury Lane, in which she
acted Ariel, Ophelia, the Fool 1 in ' Lear,' the
Attendant Spirit in ' Comus,' Philidel in ' King
Arthur,' and Acis in 'Acis and Galatea.' After
the conclusion of this memorable engagement,
Miss Horton became the leading spirit in
Planche's graceful burlesques at the Haymarket
Theatre. On Jan. 20, 1844, she married Mr.
German Reed, and the rest of her career has been
related under his name. [G.]
REEL (Anglo-Saxon hreol, connected with the
Suio-Gothic rulla, to whirl). An ancient dance,
the origin of which is enveloped in much ob
scurity. The fact of its resemblance to the
Norwegian Hattung, as well as its popularity
in Scotland, and its occurrence in Denmark, the
north of England, and Ireland, has led most
writers to attribute to it a Scandinavian origin,
although its rapid movements and lively character
are opposed to the oldest Scandinavian dance-
rhythms. The probability is that the reel is of
Keltic origin, perhaps indigenous to Britain, and
from there introduced into Scandinavia. In Scot
land the reel is usually danced by two couples ;
in England — where it is now almost only found in
connection with the Sword Dance, as performed
in the North Riding of Yorkshire — it is danced
i See Macready's Reminiscences, by S.r F. Pollock, ii. 97.
92
KEEL.
by three couples. The figures of the reel differ
slightly according to the locality ; their chief
feature is their circular character, the dancers
standing face to face and describing a series of
figures of eight. The music consists of 8-bar
phrases, generally in common time, but occa
sionally in 6-4. The Irish reel is played much
faster than the Scotch ; in Yorkshire an ordinary
hornpipe-tune is used. The following example,
'Lady Nelson's Reel,' is from a MS. collection
of dances in the possession of the present writer.
An example of the Danish reel will be found in
Engel's ' National Music' (London, 1866).
One of the most characteristic Scotch reels is
the Reel of Tulloch (Thulichan) :—
Others, equally good, are 'Colonel McBean's
Reel,' ' Ye're welcome, Charlie Stuart,' ' The
Cameronian Rant,' 'Johnnie's friends are ne'er
pleased,' and ' Flora Macdonald.'
For the slow Reel see STRATHSPEY. [W.B.S.]
REEVE, WILLIAM, born 1757 ; after quitting
school, was placed with a law stationer in Chan
cery Lane, where his fellow writer was Joseph
Munden, afterwards the celebrated comedian.
Determined however upon making music his
profession, he became a pupil of Richardson,
organist of St. James, Westminster. In 1781
he was appointed organist of Totnes. Devonshire,
where he remained till about 1783, when he was
engaged as composer at Astley's. He was next
for some time an actor at the regular theatres.
In 1791, being then a chorus singer at Covent
Garden, he was applied to to complete the com-
REEVES.
position of the music for the ballet-pantomime
of ' Oscar and Malvina,' left unfinished by Shield,
who, upon some differences with the manager,
had resigned his appointment. Reeve thereupon
produced an overture and some vocal music,
which were much admired, and led to his being
appointed composer to the theatre. In 1792
he was elected organist of St. Martin, Lud-
gate. In 1802 he became part proprietor of
Sadler's Wells Theatre. His principal dramatic
compositions were 'Oscar and Malvina,' and
'Tippoo Saib,' 1791; 'Orpheus and Eurydice,'
partly adapted from, Gluck, 1792; 'The Ap
parition,' ' British Fortitude,' ' Hercules and
Omphale,' and 'The Purse,' 1794; 'Merry
Sherwood,' 1795 ; ' Harlequin and Oberon,' 1796;
' Bantry Bay," 'The Round Tower,' and 'Harle
quin and Quixote,' 1 797 ; ' Joan of Arc,' ' Ramah
Droog' (with Mazzinghi), 1798 ; 'The Turnpike
Gate ' (with Mazzinghi), and ' The Embarkation/
1 799 ; ' Paul and Virginia ' (with Mazzinghi),
1800 ; ' Harlequin's Almanack,' 'The Blind Girl'
(with Mazzinghi), 1801 ; 'The Cabinet' (with
Braham, Davy, and Moorehead), and 'Family
Quarrels' (with Braham and Moorehead), 1802;
'The Caravan,' 1803; 'The Dash,' 'Thirty
Thousand' (with Davy and Braham), 1804; 'Out
of Place' (with Braham), 1805; 'The White
Plume,' and 'Au Bratach,' 1806; 'Kais' (with
Braham), 1808 ; ' Tricks upon Travellers ' (part),
1 8 10 ; .and 'The Outside Passenger ' (with Whita-
ker and D. Corri), 1811. He wrote music for
some pantomimes at Sadler's Wells; amongst
them ' Bang up," by C. Dibdin, jun., containing
the favourite Clown's song, ' Tipitywichet,' for
Grimaldi. He was also author of ' The Juvenile
Preceptor, or Entertaining Instructor,' etc. He
died June 22, 1815. [W.H.H.]
REEVES, JOHN SIMS, son of a musician, was
born at Shooter's Hill, Kent, Oct. 21, 1822. He
received his early musical instruction from his
father, and at 14 obtained the post of organist
at North Cray Church, Kent. Upon gaining
his mature voice he determined on becoming a
singer, and in 1839 made his first appearance
in that capacity at the Newnastle-upon-Tyne
Theatre, as Count Rudolpho in ' La Sonnambula,'
and subsequently performed Dandini in ' La
Cenerentola/ and other baritone parts. The
true quality of his voice, however, having asserted
itself, he placed himself under Hobbs and T.
Cooke, and in the seasons of 1841-42 and 1842-43
was a member of Macready's company at Drury
Lane, as one of the second tenors, performing such
parts as the First Warrior in Purcell's ' King
Arthur,' Ottocar in 'Der Freischiitz,' and the
like. He then went to the continent to prose
cute his studies, and in a short time afterwards
appeared at Milan as Edgardo in Donizetti's
'Lucia di Lammermoor' with marked success.
Returning to England he was engaged by Jullien
for Drury Lane, where he made his first appear
ance on Monday, Dec. 6, 1847, as Edgar in 'The
Bride of Lammermoor,' and at once took position
as an actor and singer of the first rank. ' His
voice had become a pure high tenor of delicious
REEVES.
quality, the tones vibrating and equal throughout,
very skilfully managed, and displaying remark
ably good taste. His deportment as an actor was
natural and easy, his action manly and to the
purpose, and exhibiting both passion and power,
without the least exaggeration.' A fortnight later
he performed his first original part, Lyonnel in
Balfe's ' Maid of Honour.' In 1848 he was en
gaged at Her Majesty's Theatre, and came out
as Carlo in Donizetti's 'Linda di Chamounix.'
In the autumn he was engaged at the Norwich
Musical Festival, where he showed his ability
as an oratorio singer by an extraordinarily
fine delivery of ' The enemy said ' in ' Israel in
Egypt.' On Nov. 24 following he made his first
appearance at the Sacred Harmonic Society in
Handel's ' Messiah.' The rapid strides which he
was then making towards perfection in oratorio
were shown — to take a few instances only —
by his 'performance in 'Judas Maccabeus' and
' Samson,' 'Elijah,' 'St. Paul/ and 'Lobgesang,'
and 'Eli' and 'Naaman' (both composed ex
pressly for him). But his greatest triumph
was achieved at the Handel Festival at the
Crystal Palace in 1857, when, after singing
in ' Messiah ' and ' Judas Maccabeus ' with in
creased reputation, he gave ' The enemy said '
in ' Israel in Egypt ' with such remarkable
power, fire, and volume of voice, breadth of style,
and evenness of vocalisation, as completely elec
trified his hearers. He repeated this wonderful
performance at several succeeding festivals. On
the stage he has been uniformly successful in
all styles, from the simplest old English ballad
opera to the most complex modern grand pro
duction. A recent letter from Mr. Reeves, pub
lished in the Times in Nov. 1880, speaks of
his intended retirement from public life as an
artist in 1882, and shows in its whole tenor how
deep an interest is felt by this great singer in the
welfare, in his own country, of the art in which
he himself has been so successful. Mr. Reeves
married, Nov. 2, 1850, Miss EMMA LUCOMBE,
soprano singer, who had been a pupil of Mrs.
Blane Hunt, and appeared at the Sacred Har
monic Society's concert of June 19, 1839, and
sang there and at other concerts until 1845, when
she went to Italy. She returned in 1848, and
appeared in opera as well as at concerts. Mrs.
Reeves has for some years past retired from public
life and occupied herself as a teacher of singing,
for which she has a deservedly high reputation.
His son HERBERT, after a careful education under
his father and at Milan, made his successful debut
at one of Mr. Ganz's concerts (June 12,1 880), and
has already met with great favour from the public.
His voice, though not yet so strong as his father's,
is of beautiful quality, and in taste, intelligence
and phrasing he is all that might be expected
from his parentage and education. [W.H.H.]
REFORMATION SYMPHONY, THE.
Mendelssohn's own name, and that adopted in
England, for his Symphony in D minor, written
with a view to performance at the Tercentenary
Festival of the Augsburg Protestant Confession,
which was intended to be celebrated throughout
REGIBO.
93
Germany on June 25, 1830. The first mention
of it appears to be in a letter of his own from
North Wales, Sept. 2, 1829. On May 15, 1830,
he writes from Weimar that it is finished, and
when copied will be sent to Leipzig. It was not
however then performed ; the political troubles
of that year prevented any festive demonstra
tions. In January and March, 1832, it was in
rehearsal in Paris, but it did not come to actual
performance till Nov. 1832, when it was played
under his own direction at Berlin. It was not
repeated during his life, but was revived at the
Crystal Palace, Sydenham, Nov. 30, 1867. It
was published in score and parts by Novello
& Co., and by Simrock as ' Symphony No. 5 ' —
Op. 107, No. 36 of the posthumous works. The
first Allegro is said to represent the conflict
between the old and new religions, and the
Finale is founded on Luther's Hymn, ' Ein'
veste Burg ist unser Gott.' [G.]
REFRAIN (Fr. Refrain; Germ. ReimJcehr}.
This word is used in music to denote what in
poetry is called a ' burden,' i. e. a short sentence
or phrase which recurs in every verse or stanza.
It was probably first employed in music in order
to give roundness and unity to the melody, and
was then transferred to the poetry which was
written especially for music. Such collections as
the ' Echos du temps passe" ' give an abundance
of examples in French music, where songs with
refrains are most frequently to be found. ' Lil-
liburlero ' may be cited as one English instance
out of many. [See vol. ii. p. 138.] [J. A.F.M.]
REGAL (Fr. Regale; It. Regale or Ninfale).
An old German name for a very small organ —
also called ' Bibelorgan ' or ' Bibelregal,' because
it was sometimes so small as to fold up into the
size of a Church Bible. It had a single rank of
reed-pipes only. Praetorius in his Syntagma,
vol. iii. pi. iv. gives a view of one, which in its
extended condition, bellows and all, appears to be
about 3 ft. 6 in. by 3 ft. He ascribes (ii. p. 73) the
invention to a nameless monk ; others give it to
Roll, an organ-builder at Nuremberg in 1575.
The specimen preserved in the Muse'e of the
Conservatoire at Paris is said to date from the
end of the i6th century, and has a compass of
4 octaves. The instrument has been long since
extinct, but the name ' regal ' is still applied in
Germany to certain reedstops.
In the inventory of Henry VIII's musical
instruments we find 13 pairs of single regalls
(the _ ' pair ' meant only one instrument) and
5 pair of double regalls (that is with two pipes
to each note). The name continued in use at
the English Court down to 1773, the date of
the death of Bernard Gates, who was ' tuner of
the Regals in the King's household.' [G.]
REGAN, ANNA, soprano singer. [See
SCHIMON,]
REGIBO, ABEL BENJAMIN MARIE, born at
Renaix in Belgium, April 6, 1835, received his
first lessons in music from his father, who was
director of the choir of the College of St. Hermes
in that town. From infancy Regibo showed a
94
REGIBO.
great inclination to music. In 1848 lie entered
the Conservatoire at Ghent, where he was placed
for piano under Max Heyndericks ; and in two
years, while following the instruction of Joseph
Mengal, he obtained the prize for harmony. Ge-
vaert gave him lessons in counterpoint. In 1854
his father removed him to the Conservatoire at
Brussels, where Lemmens taught him the organ,
and Fe"tis composition. Among his numerous
compositions, the fruit of these studies, there is
a trio for piano, harmonium, and cello, dedicated
to Eetis. A second trio for the same combina
tion is dedicated to Gevaert. In 1856 Regibo
contracted for two years with Messrs Mercklin
and Schiitze to display their organs' and har
moniums, and was publicly heard on the latter
in Holland, in London and in Paris. Having
found in a garret of his father's house a spinet
by Albert Delin of Tournai, dated 1756, which
had been the musical instrument of his childhood,
he conceived the idea of collecting all the old
Belgian clavecins, spinets and dulcimers possible
—an idea the successful carrying out of which is
likely to make his name widely known. Regibo
has proposed to himself the patriotic task of re
deeming the works of the old Belgian makers from
their unmerited obscurity, and after a quarter
of a century's research he has now the largest
collection existing of the clavecins of the great
Antwerp makers, including the greatest of all, the
family of Ruckers. [See RUCKERS ; also COLLEC
TIONS in the Appendix.] To justify the import
ance of his object he is now engaged upon a
technical treatise, soon to be published, upon the
last three centuries of this instrumental art of his
native country, which has no early rival even of
approximate importance except the still earlier
efforts of Northern Italy in the same direction.
In 1872 Regibo was summoned to his native town
to take the direction of the School of Music, a
post which he still holds (1881). [A. J.H.]
REGISTER, of an organ. Literally, a set
of pipes as recorded or described by the name
written on the draw -stop ; hence, in general, an
organ-stop. The word ' register ' is however not
quite synonymous with 'stop,' for we do not say
' pull out, or put in, a register,' but, « a stop,''
although we can say indifferently ' a large
number of registers ' or ' of stops.' The word is
also used as a verb ; for example, the expression
' skill in registering ' or ' registration ' means
skill in selecting various combinations of stops
for use. The word ' stop ' is however never used
as a verb, in this sense. [J.S.]
REGISTER is now employed to denote a
portion of the scale. The 'soprano register,'
the 'tenor register,' denote that part of the
scale which forms the usual compass of those
voices ; the ' head register ' means the notes
which are sung with the head voice ; the ' chest
register,' those which are sung from the chest ;
the ' upper register ' is the higher portion of the
compass of an instrument or voice, and so on.
How it came to have this meaning, the writer
has not been able to discover. [G.]
REGISTRATION.
REGISTRATION (or REGISTERING) is
the only convenient term for indicating the art of
selecting and combining the stops or ' registers '
in the organ so as to produce the best effect and
contrast of tone, and is to the organ what ' or
chestration ' is to the orchestra. The stops of
an organ may be broadly clased under the two
divisions of ' flue-stops ' and ' reed-stops.' [See
OKGAN.] The flue-stops again may be regarded
as classed under three sub-divisions — those which
represent the pure organ tone (as the diapasons,
principal,, fifteenth, and mixtures), those which
aim at an imitation of string or of reed tone (as
the viol one, viola, gamba, etc.), and those which
represent flute tone. In considering the whole
of the stops en masse, a distinction may again be
drawn between those which are intended to com
bine in the general tone (' mixing stops ') and
those, mostly direct imitations of orchestral in
struments, which are to be regarded as 'solo
stops ' to be used for special effects, as the
clarinet, orchestral oboe, vox humana, etc. Some
stops, such as the harmonic flute, are capable of
effective use, with certain limitations, in either
capacity.
The use of the pure solo stops is guided by
nearly the same aesthetic considerations as the
use in the orchestra of the instruments which
they imitate [see OKCHESTKATION], by suitability
of timbre for the expression and feeling of the
music. These stops form, however, the smallest
and on the whole the least important portion of
the instrument.
In the combination of the general mass of stops
there are some rules which are invariable — e. g. a
' mutation stop,' such as the twelfth, can never be
used without the stop giving the unison tone next
above it (the fifteenth), and the mixtures can
never be used without the whole or the principal
mass of the stops giving the sounds below them,
except that on the swell manual the mixture
may sometimes be used with the 8-feet stops
only, to produce a special effect. On the great-
organ manual it is generally assumed that the
stops are added in the order in which they are
always placed, the unison diapason stops and the
i6-feet stops lowest, the principal, twelfth, fif
teenth, and mixtures in ascending order above
them ; and the reeds at the top, to be added last,
to give the full power of the instrument. But
this general rule has its exceptions for special
purposes. If it be desired to play afugato passage
with somewhat of a light violin effect, the fif
teenth added to the 8-feet steps, omitting the
principal and twelfth, has an excellent effect,1
more especially if balanced by a light i6-feet
stop beneath the diapasons. The 8-feet reeds,
again, may be used with the diapasons only, with
very fine effect, in slow passages of full harmony.
The harmonic flute of 4-feet tone is usually
found on the great manual, but should be used
with caution. It often has a beautiful effect in
addition to the diapasons, floating over them and
1 For this reason the twelfth and fifteenth should never be com
bined on one slide, as is occasionally done for the sake of economy
in mechanism.
REGISTRATION.
brightening up their tone, but should be shut off
when the 4-feet principal is added, or when the
'full to fifteenth' is used, as the two tones do not
amalgamate. The 1 6-feet stops on the manuals
are intended to give weight and gravity of tone,
and are always admirable with the full or nearly
the full organ. In combination with the diapasons
only their use is determined by circumstances ;
with a very full harmony they cause a muddy
effect ; with an extended harmony in pure parts
they impart a desirable fullness and weight of
tone, and seem to fill in the interstices of the
unison stops : e. g. —
g^UJ-
REGISTRATION.
95
t
.2^1
r
No. I would be injured by the addition of a
i6-feet stop below the diapasons ; No. 2 would
be improved by it.
The swell organ stops are very like the great
organ in miniature, except that the reed-stops
predominate more in tone, and are more often
used either alone or with diapasons c::ly, the
stronger and more pronounced tone of the reeds
being requisite to bring out the full effect of
the crescendo on opening the swell box. The
oboe alone, in passages of slow harmony, has a
beautiful effect, rich yet distant. The choir
organ is always partially composed of solo stops,
and the bulk of its stops are usually designed
for special effects when used separately, though
with a certain capability of mixing in various
combinations. It may be observed that qualities
of tone which mix beautifully in unison will often
not mix in different octaves. The union of one
of the soft reedy-toned stops, of the gamba class,
with an 8-feet clarabella flute, has a beautiful
creamy effect in harmonised passages, but the
addition of a 4-feet flute instead is unsatisfactory ;
and the combination with the clarabella, though
so effective for harmony, would be characterless
as a solo combination for a melody. The effect
of a light 4-feet flute over a light 8-feet stop of
not too marked character is often admirable for
the accompanying harmonies to a melody played
on another manual ; Mendelssohn refers to this
in the letter in which he speaks of his delight in
playing the accompaniment in Bach's arrange
ment of the chorale 'Schmucke dich' in this way ;
the flute, he observes, 'continually floating above
the chorale.' This class of effect is peculiar to
the organ ; it is quite distinct from that of dou
bling a part with the flute an octave higher in the
orchestra; in the organ the whole harmony is
doubled, but in so light and blending a manner
that the hearer is not conscious of it as a dou
bling of the parts, but only as a bright and liquid
effect.
In contrasting the stops on the different
manuals, one manual may be arranged so as to
# 1 — *—
f
•-
^
^
-K=
m
H
••
:
KB
f>
1
t-
13
V # 5
*
'• **
i
"" J *
* r
I
Swell with Reeds, 8-feet
be an echo or light repetition of the other, as when
a selection of stops on the swell manual is used
as the piano to the forte of a similar selection on
the great manual ; but more often the object is
contrast of tone, especially when the two hands
use two manuals simultaneously. In such case
the stops must be selected, not only so as to stand
out from each other in tone, but so that each
class of passage may have the tone best fitted
for its character. In this example, from Smart's
Theme and Variations in A, for instance-
Great Organ Flute, &.
8-feet. -!•- _
if the registering were reversed, the chords played
on the flute-stop and the brilliant accompaniment
on the swell reeds, it would not only be ineffec
tive but aesthetically repugnant to the taste, from
the sense of the misuse of tone : this of course
would be an extreme example of misuse, merely
instanced here as typical. The use of flute tone
over reed tone on another keyboard is often
beautiful in slow passages also ; e. g. from 1Rhein-
berger's Sonata in Fjf : —
Adagio non troppo
A ft
^ —
^
y #». o
I" •
I
j\
r f
[
1
ff\ \ •*
KJ
1
'•
•
xNL/ i~f
^^
*J 8-feet Flute,
Great or Solo Organ.
£? ^^^^
^
)' Su. 9
j.i
f'J-
1 — *&
— p
•Z J Tt
' *
* 4-
\^
^T
fe
^
^vl
i
i i
Swell, Soft 8-feet Reed only.
' ~\* ^L *f
v
z±3tS
Pedal Bourdon, coupled to Swell.
where the flute seems to glide like oil over the
comparatively rough tones of the reed. Differing
tones may sometimes be combined with good
effect by coupling two manuals ; swell reeds
coupled to great-organ diapasons is a fine com
bination, unfortunately hackneyed by church
organists, many of whom are so enamoured of it
that they seldom let one hear the pure diapason
tone, which it must always be remembered is
the real organ tone, and the foundation of the
whole instrument. Special expression may some
times be obtained by special combinations of
pitch. Slow harmonies played on 1 6-feet and 8-feet
flutes, or flute-tuned stops, only, produce a very
funereal and weird effect.2 Brilliant scale pas
sages and arpeggios, accompanying a harmony
on another keyboard, may be given with an
effect at once light and bizarre, with the 1 6-feet
bourdon and the fifteenth three octaves above
it, Saint-Saens, in his first ' Rhapsodic,' writes
1 The registering is our own ; the composer gives no indication.
2 See a little piece entitled 'Adagio Elegiaeo,' in Best's 'Organ
Pieces for Church Use.'
REGISTRATION.
REGISTRATION.
an arpeggio accompaniment for flutes in three
octaves —
Flutes, 8. 4, and 2 feet.
Swell Eeed.
though it is perhaps better with the 4-feet flute
omitted. The clarinet, though intended as a solo
stop, may occasionally be used with great effect
in harmonised passages (in combination with a
light flue-stop to fill up and blend the tone), and
should therefore always be carried through the
whole range of the keyboard, not stopped at
tenor C, as most builders do with it. The
vox-humana should never be combined with any
other stop on the same manual ; the French
organists write it so, bufc it is a mistake ; and, it
may be added, it should be but sparingly used
at all. It is one of the tricks of organ effect,
useful sometimes for a special expression, but
very liable to misuse. The modern introduction
of a fourth keyboard, the ' solo manual,' entirely
for solo stops, puts some new effects in the hands
of the player, more especially through the medium
of brilliant reed-stops voiced on an extra pressure
of wind. These give opportunity for very fine
effects in combination with the great-organ
manual ; sometimes in bringing out a single em
phatic note, as in a passage from Bach's A minor
Fugue —
tr Solo Organ, Tuba Reed, ff
Gt.
y.
Great Organ, Full to Mixtures.
1
Pedal ff
where the long blast from the solo reed, sounding
above the sway and movement of the other parts,
i In this case the solo reed is supposed to be coupled to the choir
manual (immediately below the great manual), and the lower notes
on the treble stave are taken by the first finger ot the right hand, the
fourth finger ot the same hand continuing to hold the E on the lower
manual. In some modern organs the solo manual is placed imme
diately above or below the great manual, in order to facilitate such a
combination, which is often exceedingly useful.
has a magnificent effect. The solo reeds may be
used also to give contrast in repeated phrases in
full harmony, as in this passage from the finale
of Mendelssohn's first Sonata —
Solo Organ
Great Organ ff Reeds.
1 Great Organ.
_
1 i
1
1
^n *~i
Za J
/a «
^ m 1 J
lQ)
» jf ^
-M-. •-^H-.— ?
~^-.« ..-->.; * .
-F — •-'-•1-
1 -^ -^ -^
p ,
± r ?w
- * J- J ! -T3
-^i — L-
•
P •
p S P
w g w--
r v i
p"
— h
1
•• 1 1
Pedal.
•y
• P
r • P
'• i
i
•
•S h
1
1 r
PL_ «_
^2
Combinations and effects such as these might
be multiplied ad infinitum ; in fact, the possible
combinations on an organ of the largest size are
nearly endless ; and it must be observed that
organs vary so much in detail of tone and balance,
that each large instrument presents to some ex
tent a separate problem to the player.
It is remarkable that in the great organ works
of Bach and his school there is hardly an indi
cation of the stops to be employed. It is perhaps
on this account that it was long the custom, and is
so still with a majority of players, to treat Bach's
fugues for the organ as if they were things to be
mechanically ground out without any attempt at
effect or colouring ; as if, as we heard a distin
guished player express it, it were sufficient to
pull out all the stops of a big organ 'and then
wallow in it.' It is no wonder under these cir
cumstances that many people think of organ
fugues as- essentially ' dry.' The few indications
that are given in Bach's works, as in the Toccata
in the Doric mode, show, however, that he was
fully alive to the value of contrast of tone and
effect ; and with all the increased mechanical
facilities for changing and adjusting the stops in
these days, we certainly eught to look for some
more intelligent ' scoring ' of these great works
for the organ, in accordance with their style and
character, which is in fact as various as that of
any other branch of classical music, and to get
rid of the idea that all fugues must necessarily
be played as loud as possible. Many of Bach's
organ works are susceptible of most delicate and
even playful treatment in regard to effect ; and
nearly all the graver ones contain episodes which
seem as if purposely intended to suggest variety
of treatment. There must, however, be a dis
tinction made between fugues which have 'epi
sodes/ and fugues which proceed in a regular
and unbroken course to a climax. Some of Bach'?!
organ fugues, and nearly all of Mendelssohn's,
are of the latter class, and require to be treated
accordingly.
In arranging the effective treatment of organ
music of this class, it is necessary often to make
a special study of the opportunities for changing
the stops so as to produce no perceptible break
in the flow of the whole. The swell-organ is the
most useful bridge for passing from loud to soft
REGISTRATION.
and back again ; when open it should be powerful
enough to be passed on to from the great organ
without a violent contrast, when the tone can be
reduced gradually by closing it ; the reverse pro
ceeding being adopted in returning to the great-
manual. It is possible to add stops on the great-
manual in the course of playing, so as hardly to
make any perceptible break, by choosing a mo
ment when only a single note is being sounded ;
the addition of a stop at that moment is hardly
noticed by the hearer, who only finds when the
other parts come in again that the tone is more
brilliant. If it be a flue-stop that is to be
added, a low note is the best opportunity, as
the addition of a more acute stop of that class
is least felt there ; if a reed is to be added, it
should be drawn on a high note, as the reed
tone is most prominently felt in the lower part
of the scale. It should be added that it is abso
lutely inadmissible to delay or break the tempo
to gain time for changing a stop ; the player must
make his opportunities without any such license.
Tolerably close imitations of orchestral effects
are possible on the organ, and an immense num
ber of 'arrangements' of this kind have been
made ; but as it is at best but an imperfect
imitation, this is not a pursuit to be encouraged.
On the other hand, arrangements of piano music
for the organ, provided that a careful selection is
made of that which is in keeping with the charac
ter of the instrument, may often be very inter
esting and artistically valuable, as giving to the
music a larger scale and new beauties of tone and
expression, and affording scope for the unfettered
exercise of taste and feeling in the invention of
effects suitable to the character of the music.
The foregoing remarks may, we hope, afford
some answer to the question so often asked by
the uninitiated, ' how do you know which stops
to use ? ' but it must be added that a sensitive
ear for delicacies of timbre is a gift of which it
may be said, nascitur, non fit ; and no one will
acquire by mere teaching the perception which
gives to each passage its most suitable tone-
colouring. [H.H.S.]
• REGONDI, GIULIO, of doubtful parentage,
bora at Geneva in 1822. His reputed father was
a teacher in the Gymnasium of Milan. The child
appears to have been an infant phenomenon on
the guitar, and to have been sacrificed by his
father, who took him to every court of Europe,
excepting Madrid, before he was nine years old.
They arrived in England in 1831 or 1832; and
Giulio seems never to have left the United King
dom again except for two concert tours in Ger
many, one with Herr Lidel, the violoncello player
in 1841, the other with Mad. Dulcken in 1846.
On the former of these tours he played both the
guitar and the melophone (whatever that may
have been), and evoked enthusiastic praises from
the correspondents of the A. M. Zeitung in
Prague and Vienna for his extraordinary execu
tion on both instruments, the very artistic and
individual character of his performance, and the
sweetness of his cantabile. The concertina was
patented by Sir Charles Wheats tone in 1829 [see
VOL. III. PT. I.
REHEARSAL.
97
CONCERTINA"!, but did not come into use till
Regondi took it up. He wrote two concertos
for it, and a very large number of arrange
ments, as well as of original compositions,
among which a graceful piece, 'Les Oiseaux,'
was perhaps the most favourite. He also
taught it largely, and at one time his name was
to be seen in almost all concert programmes.
He was a great friend of Molique's, who wrote
for him a Concerto for the Concertina (in G)
which he played with great success at the Concert
of the Musical Society of London, Apr, 20, 1864.
When he went abroad for his second tour, his
performance and the effect which he got out of
so unpromising and inartistic an instrument as
tonished the German critics. (See the A. M.
Zeitung for 1846, p. 853.) Regondi appears to
have been badly treated by his father and to
have had wretched health, which carried him
off on May 6, 1872. He was a fine linguist
and a very attractive person. His talent was
exquisite, and in better circumstances he might
have been one of the really great artists. [G.]
REHEARSAL (Fr. Edpetition, Ger. Probe).
In the case of Concerts, a performance pre
liminary to the public one, at which each piece
included in the programme is played through
at least once, if in MS. to detect the errors in
evitable in the parts, and in any case to study
the work and discover how best to bring out
the intentions of the composer, and to ensure
a perfect ensemble on the part of the performers.
In England, owing to many reasons, but princi
pally to the over-occupation of the players, suffi
cient rehearsals are seldom given to orchestral
works. The old rule of the Philharmonic Society
(now happily to be altered) was to have one re
hearsal on Saturday morning for the performance
on Monday evening, and this perhaps set the ex
ample. Unless the music is familiar to the players
this is not enough. No new works can be effici
ently performed with less than two rehearsals ;
and in the case of large, intricate, and vocal works,
many more are requisite. We have it on record
that Beethoven's Eb Quartet, op. 127, was re
hearsed seventeen times before its first perform
ance ; the players therefore must have arrived at
that state of familiarity and certainty which a
solo player attains with a concerto or sonata.
An ingenious method of adding to the attrac
tion of a series of concerts has been sometimes
adopted in England of late years by making the
rehearsals public ; but a rehearsal in face of a
large well-dressed audience, unless the conductor
and performers are above ordinary human weak
nesses, is no rehearsal in the true sense of the
word, and can be of little or no avail for the
efficient performance of the music.
In the case of Operas, every practice of either
chorus, principals, or orchestra, separately or
together, is termed a rehearsal. These will some
times continue every day for six weeks or two
months, as the whole of the voice-music, dialogue,
and action has to be learnt by heart. Whilst the
chorus is learning the music in one part of the
theatre, the principals are probably at work with
II
98
REHEARSAL.
the composer at a piano in the Green-room, and
the ballet is being rehearsed on the stage. It is
only when the music and dialogue are known by
heart that the rehearsals on the stage with action
and business begin. The orchestra is never used
until the last two or three rehearsals, and these
are termed Full Band Rehearsals (Germ. General-
probe). Last of all, before the public production
of the work, comes the Full Dress Rehearsal,
exactly as it will appear in performance. [G.]
REICHA, ANTON JOSEPH, born at Prague,
Feb. 27, 1770, lost his father before he was a year
old ; his mother not providing properly for his
education he left home, and took refuge with his
grandfather at Glattow, in Bohemia. The means
of instruction in this small town being too limited,
he went on to his uncle Joseph Reicha (born in
Prague, 1746, died at Bonn, 1795), a cellist, con
ductor, and composer, who lived at Wallerstein
in Bavaria. His wife, a native of Lorraine, speak
ing nothing but French, had no children, so
they adopted the nephew, who thus learned to
speak French and German besides his native Bo
hemian. He now began to study the violin,
pianoforte, and flute in earnest. On his uncle's
appointment, in 1788, as musical director to the
Elector of Cologne, he followed him to Bonn,
and entered the Chapel of Maximilian of Austria
as second flute. The daily intercourse with good
music roused the desire to compose, and to become
something more than an ordinary musician, but
his uncle refused to teach him harmony. He
managed, however, to study the works of Kirn-
berger and Marpurg in secret, gained much
practical knowledge by hearing the works of
Handel, Mozart, and Haydn, and must have
learned much from his constant intercourse with
Beethoven, who played the viola in the same
baud with himself and was much attached to him.
At length his perseverance and his success in
composition conquered his uncle's dislike. He
composed without restraint, and his symphonies
and other works were played by his uncle's
orchestra.1
On the dispersion of the Elector's Court in
1794, Reicha went to Hamburg, where he re
mained till 1799. There the subject of instruc
tion in composition began to occupy him, and
there he composed his first opera, ' Obaldi, ou
les Fran9ais en Egypte' (2 acts). Though not
performed, some numbers were well received, and
on the advice of a French e'migre', he started for
Paris towards the close of 1799, in the hope of
producing it at the Theatre Feydeau. In this
he failed, but two of his symphonies, an overture,
and some ' Scenes italiennes,' were played at
concerts. After the successive closing of the
Theatre Feydeau and the Salle Favart, he went
to Vienna, and passed six years (1802-1808), in
renewed intimacy with Beethoven, and making
friends with Haydn, Albrechtsberger, Salieri, and
others. The patronage of the Empress Maria
Theresa was of great service to him, and at her
request he composed an Italian opera, 'Argina,
See an interesting uotice Dj Ka.stner. quoted ty Tbajei; 'Bee-
' i. I.Vfc
REICHA.
regina di Granata.' During this happy period
of his life he published symphonies, oratorios, a
requiem, 6 string quintets, and many solos for
PF. and other instruments. He himself attached
great importance to his '36 Fugues pour le piano,'
dedicated to Haydn, but they are not the inno
vations which he believed them to be ; in placing
the answers on any and every note of the scale
he merely reverted to the Ricercari of the I7th
century, and the only effect of this abandonment
of the classic laws of the Real fugue was to
banish tonality.
The prospect of another war induced Reicha
to leave Vienna, and he settled finally in Paris in
1808. He now realised the dream of his youth,
producing first ' Cagliostro ' (Nov. 27, 1810), an
ope*ra-comique composed with Dourlen ; and at
the Academic, 'Natalie' (3 acts, July 30, 1816),
and 'Sapho' (Dec. 16, 1822). Each of these
works contains music worthy of respect, but they
had not sufficient dramatic effect to take with
the public.
Reicha's reputation rests on his chamber-
music, and on his theoretical works. Of the
former the following deserve mention : a die-
cetto for 5 strings and 5 wind instruments ; an
ottet for 4 strings and 4 wind instruments ; 24
quintets for flute, oboe, clarinet, horn, and baa-
soon ; 6 quintets and 20 quartets for strings;
i quintet for clarinet and strings ; I quartet for
PF., flute, cello, and bassoon ; I do. for 4 flutes;
6 do. for flute, violin, tenor, and cello ; 6 string
trios; i trio for 3 cellos; 24 do. for 3 horns;
6 duets for 2 violins; 22 do. for 2 flutes; 11
sonatas for PF. and violin, and a number of
sonatas and pieces for PF. solo. He also com
posed symphonies and overtures. These works
are more remarkable for novelty of combinatioa
and striking harmonies, than for abundance and
charm of ideas. Reicha was fond of going out of
his way to make difficulties for the purpose of
conquering them ; for instance, iAthe ottet the
strings are in G, and the wind in E minor, and
in the sestet for 2 clarinets concertanti one is in
A, and the other in B. This faculty for solving
musical problems brought him into notice among • ,
musicians when he first settled in Paris, and in
1818 he was offered the professorship of counter
point and fugue at the Conservatoire. Among
his pupils there were Boilly, Jelensperger, Bien-
aime, Millaut, Lefebvre, Elwart, Pollet, Lecar-
pentier, Dancla, and others ; Barbereau, Seuriot,
Blanchard, Mme. de Montgeroult, Bloc, Musard,
and George Onslow, were private friends.
His didactic works, all published in Paris,
are : /Traite" de Melodic,' etc. (4to, 1814) ; 'Cours
de composition musicale,' etc. (1818) ; ' Trait^ de
haute composition musicale' (ist part 1824, 2n^
1826), a sequel to the two first; and 'Art du
compositeur dramatique,' etc. (410, 1833).
F£tis has criticised his theories severely, and
though highly successful in their day, they are
now abandoned, but nothing can surpass the
clearness and method of his analysis, and those
who use his works will always find much to
be grateful for. Czerny published a German
REICHA.
translation of the « Traitd de haute composition'
(Vienna, 1834, 4 vols. folio), and in his 'Art
d'iinproviser ' obviously made use of Reicha's
'Art de varier' — 57 variations on an original
theme.
Reicha married a Parisian, was naturalised in
1829, and received the Legion of Honour in 1831.
He presented himself several times for election
to the Institut before his nomination as Boiel-
dieu's successor in 1835. H-e on^J enjoyed his
honours a short time, being carried off by in
flammation of the lungs, May 28, 1836. His
death was deplored by the many friends whom
his trustworthy and honourable character had
attached to him. A life-like portrait, somewhat
spoiled by excessive laudation, is contained in the
'Notice sur Reicha' (Paris, 1837, 8vo), by his
pupil Delaire.1 [G.C.]
REICHARDT, ALEXANDER, a tenor singer,
was born at Packs, Hungary, April 17, 1825.
He received his early instruction in music from
an uncle, and made his first appearance at the
age of 1 8 at the Lemberg theatre as Rodrigo in
Rossini's ' Otello.' His success there led him to
Vienna, where he was engaged at the Court Opera,
and completed his education under Gentiluomo,
Catalani, etc. At this time he was much re
nowned for his singing of the Lieder of Beethoven
and Schubert, and was in request at all the
soire'es ; Prince Esterhazy made him his Kammer-
sanger. In 1846 he made a townee through Ber
lin, Hanover, etc., to Paris, returning to Vienna.
In 1851 he made his first appearance in England,
singing at the Musical Union, May 6, and at
the Philharmonic May 12, at many other con
certs, and lastly before Her Majesty. In the
following season he returned and sang in Ber
lioz's ' Romeo and Juliet,' at the new Philharmonic
Concert of April 14, also in the Choral Symphony,
Berlioz's ' Faust,' and the ' Walpurgisnight,' and
enjoyed a very great popularity both in songs
and in more^-ious pieces. From this time until
1857 he passed each season in England, singing
at concerts, and at the Royal Opera, Drury Lane,
and Her Majesty's Theatre, where he filled the
parts of the Count in 'The Barber of Seville,' Raoul
in ' The Huguenots,' Belmont in ' The Seraglio,'
Florestan in ' Fidelio,' Don Ottavio in ' Don Juan,'
etc. etc. His Florestan was a very successful
impersonation^ and in this part he was said ' to
have laid the foundation of the popularity which
he has so honourably earned and maintained in
London.' He also appeared with much success
in oratorio. In the provinces he became almost
as great a favourite as in London. In 1857 he
gave his first concert in Paris, in the Salle Erard,
and the following sentence from Berlioz's report
of the performance will give an idea of his style
and voice. ' M. Reichardt is a tenor of the first
water — sweet, tender, sympathetic and charming.
Almost all his pieces were rederuanded, and he
sang them again without a sign of fatigue.' Shortly
after this he settled in Boulogne, where he is now
' DELAIRE, JACQDES AUOCSTE, died in 1864, is kncmn as the
author oi a 'Histoire de la Romance' and other pamphlets on
music,
REICHARDT.
99
residing. Though he has retired from the active
exercise of his profession, he is not idle. He has
organised a Philharmonic Society at Boulogne ;
he is President of the Academic Communale de
Musique, and his occasional concerts for the
benefit of the hospital — where one ward is en
titled 'Fondation Reichardt' — are not only very
productive of funds but are the musical events of
the town. M. Reichardt is a composer as well
as a singer. Several of his songs, especially 'Thou
art so near,' were very .popular in their day. [G.]
REICHARDT, JOHANN FRIEDRICH, composer
and writer on music ; son of a musician ; born
Nov. 25, 1752, at Kb'nigsberg, Prussia. From
childhood he showed a great disposition for music,
and such intelligence as to interest influential
persons able to further his career. Under these
auspices he was educated and introduced into
good society, and thus formed an ideal both of
art and of life which he could scarcely have
gained had he been brought up among the petty
privations incident to his original position. Un
fortunately, the very gifts which enabled him to
adopt these high aims, fostered an amount of
conceit which often led him into difficulties. His
education was more various than precise ; music
he learned by practice rather than by any real
study. His best instrument was the violin, on
which he attained considerable proficiency, under
Veichtner, a pupil of Benda's; but he was also a
good pianist. Theory he learned from the organist
Richter. On leaving the university of Konigs
berg he started on a long tour, ostensibly to see
the world before choosing a profession, though he
had virtually resolved on- becoming a musician.
Between 1771 and 1 774 he visited Berlin, Leipzig,
Dresden, Vienna, Prague, Brunswick, and Ham
burg, made the acquaintance of the chief nota
bilities — musical, literary, and political — in each
place, and became himself in some sort a celebrity,
after the publication of his impressions in a series
of ' confidential letters ' — ' Vertraute Briefen eines
aufmerksamen Reisenden/ in 2 parts (1774 and
76). On his return to Konigsberg he went into
a government office, but hearing of the death of
Agricola of Berlin, he applied in person to Frederic
the Great for the vacant post of Capellmeister
and Court-composer, and though barely 24 ob
tained it in 1776. He at once began to introduce
reforms, both in the Italian opera and the court
orchestra, and thus excited much opposition from
those who were more conservative than himself.
While thus occupied he was indefatigable as
a composer, writer, and conductor. In 1783 he
founded the 'Concerts Spirituels' for the perform
ance of unknown works, vocal and instrumental,
which speedily gained a high reputation. He
published collections of little-known music, with
critical observations, edited newspapers, wrote
articles and critiques in other periodicals, and
produced independent works. But enemies, who
were many, contrived to annoy him so much in
the exercise of his duties, that in 1 785 he obtained
a long leave of absence, during which he visited
London and Paris, and heard Handel's oratorios
and Gluck'e operas, both of which he heartily
H2
100
REICHARDT.
admired. In both places lie met with great success
as composer and conductor, and was popular for
his social qualities ; but neither of his two French
operas ' Tamerlan ' and ' Panthe'e,' composed for
the Academic, were performed. On the death of
Frederic the Great (1786) his successor confirmed
Reichardt in his office, and he produced several
new operas, but his position became more and
more disagreeable. His vanity was of a peculiarly
offensive kind, and his enemies found a weapon
ready to their hand in his avowed sympathy with
the doctrines of the French Revolution. The
attraction of these views for a buoyant, liberal
mind like Reichardt's, always in pursuit of high
ideals, and eager for novelty, is obvious enough ;
but such ideas are dangerous at court, and after
further absence, which he spent in Italy, Ham
burg, Paris, and elsewhere, he received his dis
missal from the Capellmeistership in 1794.* He
retired to his estate, Giebichenstein, near Halle,
and occupied himself with literature and com
position, and occasional tours. In 1 796 he became
inspector of the salt works at Halle. After the
death of Frederic William II. he produced a few
more operas in Berlin, but made a greater mark
with his Singspielen, which are of real importance
in the history of German opera. In 1808 he
accepted the post of Capellmeister at Cassel to
Jerome Bonaparte, refused by Beethoven, but
did not occupy it long, as in the same year we
find him making a long visit to Vienna. On his
return to Giebichenstein he gathered round him
a pleasant and cultivated society, and there, in
the midst of his friends, he died, June 17, 1814.
Reichardt has been, as a rule, harshly judged ;
he was not a mere musician, but rather a com
bination of musician, litterateur, and man of the
world. His overweening personality led him into
many difficulties, but as a compensation he was
endued with great intelligence, and with an ardent
and genuine desire for progress in everything — •
music, literature, and politics. As a composer his
works show cultivation, thought, and honesty ;
but have not lived, because they want the ne
cessary originality. This is specially true of his
instrumental music, which is entirely forgotten.
His vocal music, however, is more important, and
a good deal of it might well be revived, especially
his Singspielen and his Lieder. The former ex
ercised considerable influence in the development
of German opera, and the latter are valuable,
both as early specimens of what is now written
by every composer, and for their own individual
merit. The Goethe-Lieder in particular show a
rare feeling for musical form. Mendelssohn was
no indulgent critic, but on more than one occasion
he speaks of J:\eichardt with a warmth which he
seldom manifests even towards the greatest mas
ters. He never rested until he had arranged for
the performance of Reichardt's Morning Hymn,
after Milton, .at the Cologne Festival of 1835;
i There was apparently some dissatisfaction with Keichardt's
efficiency as a musician as well as with his political opinions, for
Blozart's remark that the King's band contains great virtuosi, but
the effect would be better if the gentlemen played tog-ether,' certainly
implied a reflection on the conductor. Neither does Beichardt seem
to have appreciated JZozart iJ aim's 'Mozart,' ii. 410),
REID.
and his enthusiasm for the composer and his wrath
at those who criticised him, are delightful to read.3
Years afterwards, when his niind had lost the
ardour of youth, and much experience had sobered
him, he still retained his fondness for this com
poser, and few things are more charming than
the genial appreciation with which he tells
Reichardt's daughter of the effect which her
father's songs had had, even when placed in
such a dangerous position as between works of
Haydn and Mozart, at the Historical Concert
at the Gewandhaus in Feb. 1847. It is the
simplicity, the naivete", the national feeling of
this true German music that he praises, and the
applause with "which it was received shows that
he was not alone in his appreciation. Amongst
Reichardt's numerous works are 8 operas; 8
Singspielen, including 4 to Goethe's poems, 'Jery
und Bately,' ' Erwin und Elmire,' ' Claudine von
Villabella ' and ' Lilla' ; 5 large vocal works,
including Milton's * Morning Hymn/ translated
by Herder, his most important work, in 1835 ; a
large number of songs, many of which have
passed through several editions, and been pub
lished in various collections.
Reichardt's writings show critical acumen,
observation, and judgment. Besides the letters
previously mentioned, he published — ' Das Kunst-
magazin,' 8 numbers in 2 vols. (Berlin, 1782 and
91) ; ' Studien fiir Tonkiinstler und Musik-
freunde/ a critical and historical periodical with
39 examples (i 792) ; ' Vertraute Briefe aus Paris,'
3 parts (1802-3); 'Vertr.iute Briefe auf einer
Reise nach Wien, etc.' (1810); fragments of
autobiography in various newspapers ; and in
numerable articles, critiques, etc. The ' Briefe '
are specially interesting from the copious details
they give, not only on the music, but on the
politics, literature, and society of the various
places he visited. A biography, 'J. F. Reichardt,
sein Leben und seine musikalische Thatigkeit/
by Herr Schletterer, Capellmeister of the cathe
dral of Augsburg, is in progress, the ist vol. having
been published at Augsburg in 1865. [A.M.]
REID, GENERAL JOHN, born towards the
middle of last century, formerly Colonel of the
88th Regiment, a great lover of music. By
his will made in 1803 he directed his trustees, in
the event of his daughter dying without issue, to
found a Professorship of Music in the Univer
sity of Edinburgh, 'for the purpose also, after
completing such endowment as hereinafter is
mentioned, of making additions to the library of
the said University, or otherwise promoting the
general interest and advantage of the University
in such . . . manner as the Principal and Profes
sors . . . shall . . . think most fit and proper.' In
a codicil, dated 1 806, he adds — ' After the de
cease of my daughter ... I have left all my
property ... to the College of Edinburgh where
I had my education . . . and as I leave all my
music books to the Professor of Music in that
College, it is my wish that in every year after his
appointment he will cause a concert of music to
be performed on the 1 3th of February, being my
2 Letters. Dec, 28, 1833; April S, 1835.
REID.
birthday.' He also directed that at this annual
' Reid Concert ' some pieces of his own compo
sition should be performed ' by a select band.'
When by the death of General Reid's daughter
in 1838 some £70,000 became available, it seems
to have been handed over to the University au
thorities without sufficient attention to the itali
cised portion of the following instruction in the
will : ' that . . . my said Trustees . . . shall and
do, by such instrument or instruments as may be
required by the law of Scotland make over the
residue of my . . . personal estate to the Principal
and Professors of the said University.' And as
no particular sum was specified for foundation
and maintenance of the Chair of Music, con
siderable latitude being allowed to the discretion
of the University authorities, the secondary object
of the bequest received far greater care and
attention than the primary one, and for years the
Chair was starved. The Professorship was insti
tuted in 1839, when the first Professor, Mr. John
Thomson, was appointed. He lived only a short
time after his election, and in 1842 was succeeded
by Sir Henry Bishop, who resigned after two years.
Mr. H. H. Pierson was elected in 1844, but he also
resigned shortly after. In 1 845 Mr. John Donald
son, an advocate, and a good theoretical musician,
received the appointment, and from the first seems
to have resolved to obtain a more just and satis
factory bestowal of the bequest. It would be
out of place to allude further to the state of mat
ters existing up to 1855. Suffice it to say that
in 1851, anticipating Mr. Donaldson's intention
of petitioning Parliament, the Edinburgh Town
Council, as ' Patrons ' of the University, raised an
action against the Principal and Professors for
alleged mismanagement and misappropriation of
the Reid Fund. A long litigation followed, and by
decree of the Court of Session in 1855 the Uni
versity authorities were ordered to devote certain
sums to the purchase of a site, and the erection of
a building for the Class of music. The class-room
and its organ were built in 1861, and the Pro
fessor's salary — which had been fixed at the very
lowest sum suggested by the Founder, viz.
£300 — as well as the grant for the concert, were
slightly raised, and a sum set apart, by order of
the Court, for expenses of class-room, assistants,
instruments, etc.
These hardly-earned concessions are mainly due
to the determined energy of Prof. Donaldson, who
seems to have considered them sufficient when
compared with what formerly existed. He at all
events obtained for the Chair a far better position
than that which it occupied before the lawsuit.
But the disappointments and mortifications to
which he was subjected by such long and painful
conflicts not improbably shortened his life, and he
died in 1865. In that year Mr. Herbert Oakeley
was elected, who has held the appointment up to
the present time. [H.S.O.]
REID CONCERTS. These concerts have not
reached their present high position without vicis
situdes almost as unfortunate as those to which
the Reid Professorship was subjected. The earliest
concerts under Professors Thomson and Bishop,
REID CONCERTS.
101
considering the then musical taste of Scotland,
were not unworthy of General Reid's munifi
cent bequest. The £200 allowed out of the
Reid Fund was wholly inadequate to the cost of
a grand concert 400 miles from London. The
Senate therefore decided that, besides this grant,
all the tickets should be sold, and that the pro
ceeds should assist Professor Thomson in giving
a fine concert ; and the following note was printed
in the first Reid Concert Book1 in 1841 : — 'The
Professors desire it to be understood that the
whole of these sums '• — i.e. the grant and the pro
ceeds — 'is to be expended on the concert; and
th;it in order to apply as large a fund as possible
for the purpose, they have not reserved any right
of entry for their fa-iuilies or friends.'
This system was continued by Sir H. ^.
Bishop, and in 1842 and 43 the sale of tickets
enabled him to give concerts which were at
least creditable for the time and place.
Upon Professor Donaldson's accession, a plan
was initiated by him which proved most un
fortunate. He altered the system of admission
by payment to that of invitation to the whole
audience ; and in consequence the Reid Concerts
began to decline, and became an annual source
of vexation to the University, public, and Pro
fessor. The grant, which under legal pressure
afterwards seems to have been raised to £300,
was then only £200, and therefore not only was
it impossible to give an adequate concert with
out loss, but the distribution of free tickets
naturally caused jealousies and heartburnings to
'town and gown,' and the Reid Concert became
a byword and the hall in which it was held a
bear-garden. Matters seem to have culminated in
1865, when a large number of students, who
thought that they had a right of entry, broke into
the concert-hall.
Such was the state of matters on Professor
Oakeley's appointment in 1865. Finding it
impossible after twenty years to return to the
original system of Thomson and Bishop, he
made a compromise, by giving free admissions
to the Professors, the University Court, the stu
dents in their fourth year at college, and a few
leading musicians in the city, and admitting the
rest of the audience by payment. From this date
a new era dawned on the Reid Concerts ; the
university and the city were satisfied, and the
standard of performance at once rose.
In 1867 a practical beginning was made, by
the engagement of Mr. Manns and a few of the
Crystal Palace orchestra, with very good results.
Since 1 869 Mr. C. Halle and his band have been
secured, and each year the motto seems ' Excel
sior.' The demand for tickets soon became so
great that the present Professor organised two
supplementary performances on the same scale
as the ' Reid,' and thus, from concerts which on
some occasions seem to have been a mere per
formance of ballads and operatic music by a
starring party, the Reid Concert has grown into
the ' Edinburgh Orchestral,' or ' Reid Festival,'
i Remarkable as the first programme issued la Great Britain with
analytical uotes.
102
REID CONCERTS.
an annual musical gathering on the cotnpletest
and most satisfactory scale as to materials, selec
tion, and execution — one which would do
honour to any city either of Great Britain or Ger
many. To have achieved so splendid a result in
the teeth of so many difficulties does honour to
the tact, ability, and devotion of Sir Herbert
Oakeley, and is sufficient, even without his popu
larisation of the organ, to perpetuate his name
in Scotland. [&•]
REINAGLE, JOSEPH, son of a German
musician resident in England, was born at
Portsmouth. He was successively trumpeter and
horn-player, violoncellist, violinist, and violon
cellist again, and a very able performer. About
1 785 he visited Dublin, where he remained two
years. Returning to London he obtained a
prominent position in the best orchestras, and
was principal cello at Salomon's concerts when
directed by Haydn. He afterwards settled at
Oxford. He composed violin concertos, violon
cello concertos, string quartets, duets and trios
for violin and pianoforte, etc., and was author
of ' A Treatise on the Violoncello.'
His younger brother, HUGH, an eminent vio
loncellist, died at an early age at Lisbon, where
he had gone for the benefit of his health.
His son, ALEXANDER ROBERT, born atBrighton,
Aug. 21, 1799, for some time organist of St.
Peter -in-the East, Oxford, was the composer of
several psalm and hymn tunes. He retired to
Kidlington, near Oxford, where he died April 6,
1877. [W.H.H.]
REINE DE CHYPRE, LA. Opera in 5 acts ;
words by Saint-Georges, music by Hale'vy. Pro
duced at the Grand Ope'ra, Paris, Dec. 22,
1846. [G.]
HEINE DE SABA, LA. Opera in 4 acts ;
words by Barbier and Carrd, music by Gounod.
Produced at the Ope'ra Feb. 28, 1862. It was
adapted to English words under the title of
' Irene' by H. B. Farnie, and in this form was
produced as a concert at the Crystal Palace,
Aug. 12, 1865. The beautiful A"irs de ballet
contain some of Gounod's best music, and are fre
quently played at the same place. [G.]
REINE TOPAZE, LA. Opera comique in 3
acts ; words by Lockroy and Battes, music by
Victor Masse". Produced at the The'atre Lyrique
Dec. 27, 1856. In English, as Queen Topaze, at
Her Majesty's Theatre, Dec. 24, 1860. [-G.]
REINECKE, KARL, composer, conductor, and
performer, director of the Gewandhaus concerts
at Leipzig, the son of a musician, born June 23,
1827, at Altona, was from an early age trained
by his father, and at II performed in public.
As a youth he was a first-rate orchestral violin
player. At 18 he made a concert tour through
Sweden and Denmark, with especial success at
Copenhagen. In 1843 he settled in Leipzig,
where he studied diligently, and eagerly em
braced the opportunities for cultivation afforded
by the society of Mendelssohn and Schumann,
with a success which amply shows itself in his
music. In 1 844 he made a professional tour with
REINHOLD.
Wasielewski to Riga, returning by Hanover and
Bremen. He was already in the pay of Christian
VIII. of Denmark, and in 1846 he again visited
Copenhagen, and played before the court. On
both occasions he was appointed court-pianist.
In 1851 he went with Otto von Konigslow to
Italy and Paris ; and on his return Hiller secured
him for the professorship of the piano and coun
terpoint in the conservatoire of Cologne. In
1854 he became conductor of the Concertgesell-
schaft at Barmen, and in 1859 Musikdirector to
the University of Breslau. On Julius Rietz's de
parture from Leipzig to Dresden in 1 860 Reinecke
succeeded him as conductor at the Gewandhaus,
and became at the same time professor of com
position in the Conservator] um. Between the
years 1867 and 1872 he made extensive tourne'es;
in England he played at the Musical Union,
Crystal Palace, and Philharmonic, on the 6th,
1 7th, and 1 9th of April, 1869 respectively, and
met with great success both as a virtuoso and
a composer. He reappeared in this country in
1872 and was equally well received.
Reinecke's industry in composition is great,
his best works, as might be expected, being those
for piano ; his three PF. sonatas indeed are ex
cellent compositions, carrying out Mendelssohn's
technique without indulging the eccentricities of
modern virtuosi ; his pieces for 2 PFs. are also
good ; his PF. Concerto in F# minor is a well-
established favourite both with musicians and the
public. Besides other instrumental music — quin
tets, quartets, concertos for violin and cello, etc. —
he has composed an opera in 5 acts, ' Kb'nig Man
fred,' and two in one act each 'Der vierjahrigen
Posten' (after Korner) and ' Ein Abenteuer Han
del's ' ; incidental music to Schiller's ' Tell ' ; an
oratorio, ' Belsazar ' ; a cantata for men's voices,
' Hakon Jarl ' ; overtures, 'Dame Kobold,' ' Ala-
din,' 'Friedensfeier'; 2 masses, and 2 symphonies;
and a large number of songs and of pianoforte
pieces in all styles, including valuable studies and
educational works, numbering in all more than
1 60. His style is refined, his mastery over counter
point and form is absolute, and he writes with
peculiar clearness and correctness. He has also
done much editing for Breitkopf's house. His
position at Leipzig speaks for his ability as a
conductor ; as an accompanyist he is first-rate ;
and as an arranger for the pianoforte he is recog
nised as one of the first of the day. [E.G.]
REINHOLD, HUGO, a very promising young
Austrian musician, born at Vienna March 3,
1854. He began, like Haydn and Schubert, by
being a choir -boy in the Imperial Chapel, after
which, in 1868, at the instance of Herbeck, he
entered the Conservatorium, under the endow
ment of the Duke of Coburg-Gotha, where he was
put under Bruckner, Dessoff, and Epstein, re
mained till 1874, an<^ obtained a silver medal.
His published works have reached op. 18. They
consist of pianoforte music and songs ; of a suite
in five movements for pianoforte and strings, of
a prelude, minuet and fugue also for stringed
orchestra, and of a string-quartet in A (op. 18).
The two larger works were played at the Vienna
REINHOLD.
Philharmonic concerts of Dec. 9, 1877, and Nov.
17, 1878, respectively. The composer was loudly
called for on both occasions, and they are praised
by the intelligent and impartial Vienna critic of
the 'Monthly Musical Record' for their delicate
character and absence of undue pretension. The
quartet was recently executed by Hellmes-
berger. [G.]
REINHOLD, THOMAS, born at Dresden about
1690, was the reputed nephew, or, as some
said, son, of the Archbishop of that city. He
had an early passion for music, and having met
Handel at the Archbishop's residence conceived
so strong a liking for him that after a time he
quitted his abode and sought out the great
composer in London, who received him with
favour. In July 1731 he appeared at the Hay-
market Theatre as a singer in 'The Grub Street
Opera,' and afterwards sang at the King's
Theatre. He was one of the original singers
of 'The Lord is a man of war,' in Handel's
1 Israel in Egypt,' and the original representative
of the following characters in Handel's works : —
Harapha in ' Samson ' ; Somnus in ' Semele ' ;
Cyrus and Gobryas in ' Belshazzar ' ; Chelsias
and the Second Elder in ' Susanna ' ; Caleb in
'Joshua'; Simon in 'Judas Maccabeus'; the
Levite in ' Solomon ' ; and Valens in ' Theodora.'
He died in Chapel Street, Soho, in 1751.
His son, CHARLES FREDERICK, born in 1737,
received his musical education first in St. Paul's,
and afterwards in the Chapel Royal. On Feb. 3,
1755, he made his first appearance on the stage
at Drury Lane as Oberon in J. C. Smith's opera,
'The Fairies,' being announced as 'Master Rein-
hold.' He afterwards became organist of St.
George the Martyr, Bloomsbury. In 1759 he
appeared as a bass singer at Marylebone Gardens,
where he continued to sing for many seasons.
He afterwards performed in English operas, and
sang in oratorios, and at provincial festivals, etc.
He was especially famed for his singing of
Handel's song, ' 0 ruddier than the cherry.'
He was one of the principal bass singers at the
Commemoration of Handel in 1784. He retired
in 1797, and died in Somers Town, Sept. 29,
1815. [W.H.H.]
REINKEN, JOHANN ADAM, eminent German
organist, born at Deventer, in Holland, April
27, 1623, a pupil of Swelinck at Amsterdam,
became in 1654 organist of the church of St.
Catherine at Hamburg, and retained the post
till his death, Nov. 24, 1722, at the age of 99.
He was a person of some consideration at Ham
burg, both on account of his fine playing, and of
his beneficial influence on music in general, but
his vanity and jealousy of his brother artists are
severely commented on by his contemporaries.
So great and so widespread was his reputation
that Sebastian Bach frequently walked to Ham
burg from Liineburg (1700 to 1703), and Cothen
(1720), to hear him play. Reinken may be con
sidered the best representative of the North-
German school of organists of the i7th cen
tury, whose strong points were, not the classic
REISSIGER.
103
placidity of the South-German school, but great
dexterity of foot and finger, and ingenious com
binations of the stops. His compositions are
loaded with passages for display, and are de
fective in form, both in individual melodies and
general construction. His works are very scarce ;
' Hortus Musicus,' for 2 violins, viola and bass
(Hamburg 1 704) is the only one printed ; and
even in MS. only five pieces are known — 2 on
Chorales, i Toccata, and 2 Variations (for Clavier).1
Of the first of these, one — on the chorale 'An
Wasserfliissen Baby Ions '-- is specially interest
ing, because it was by an extempore perform
ance on that chorale at Hamburg in 1722 that
Bach extorted from the venerable Reinken the
words, 'I thought that this art was dead, but
I see that it still lives in you.' [A. M.]
REINTHALER, KARL, conductor of the
Private Concerts at Bremen, born Oct. 13, 1822,
in Luther's house at Erfurt, was early trained in
music by G. A. Ritter, then studied theology in
Berlin, but after passing his examination, devoted
himself entirely to music. His first attempts at
composition, some psalms sung by the Cathe
dral choir, attracted the attention of King Frede
ric William IV., and procured him a travelling
grant. He visited Paris, Milan, Rome, and
Naples, taking lessons in singing from Geraldi
and Bordogni. On his return in 1853 he ob
tained a post in the Conservatoire of Cologne, and
in 1858 became organist in the Cathedral of Bre
men. He had already composed an oratorio
' Jephta ' (performed in London by Mr. Hullah,
April 1 6, 1856, and published with English
text by Novellos), and in 1875 his opera ' Edda'
was played with success at Bremen, Hanover,
and elsewhere. His ' Bismarck -hymn ' obtained
the prize at Dortmund, and he has composed a
symphony, and a large number of part-songs.
Reinthaler's style bears a considerable resem
blance to that of Mendelssohn and Gade. [F.G.]
REISSIGER, KARL GOTTLIEB, son of Christian
Gottlieb Reissiger, who published 3 symphonies
for full orchestra in 1790. Born Jan. 31, 1798,
at Belzig near Wittenberg, where his father was
Cantor, he became in 1 8 1 1 a pupil of Schicht at the
St. Thomas School, Leipzig. In 1818 he removed
to the University with the intention of studying
theology, but some motets composed in 1815 an^
1816 had already attracted attention, and the
success of his fine baritone voice made him de
termine to devote himself to music. In 1821 he
went to Vienna and studied opera thoroughly.
Here also he composed ' Das Rockenweibchen.'
In 1822 he sang an aria of Handel's, and played
a PF. concerto of his- own composition at a con
cert in the Karnthnerthor theatre. Soon after
he went to Munich, where he studied with Peter
Winter, and composed an opera 'Dido,' which
was performed several times at Dresden under
Weber's conductorship. At the joint expense
of the Prussian government and of his patron
von Altenstein, a musician, he undertook a tour
through Holland, France, and Italy, in order to
1 Spitta's Bach, 1. 195, 196.
104
EEISSIGER.
report on the condition of music in those coun
tries. On his return he was commissioned to
draw up a scheme for a Prussian national Conser
vatoire, but at the same time was offered posts
at the Hague and at Dresden. The latter he
accepted, replacing Marschner at the opera, where
he laboured hard, producing both German and
Italian operas. In 1827 he succeeded C. M. von
Weber as conductor of the German Opera at
Dresden. Among his operas, ' Ahnenschotz,'
' Sibella,' ' Turandot,' ' Adele von Foix,' and ' Der
Schiffbruch von Medusa,' had great success in
their day, but the term ' Kapellmeistermusik '
eminently describes them, and they have almost
entirely disappeared. The overture to the Fel-
senmiihle, a spirited and not uninteresting piece,
is occasionally met with in concert programmes.
Masses and church music, a few Lieder, and par
ticularly some graceful and easy trios for PF.
violin and cello, made his name very popular for
a period. He is generally supposed to have been
the composer of the piece known as 'Weber's Last
Waltz.' Reissiger died Nov. 7, 1859, an^ was
succeeded at Dresden by Julius Rietz. [F.G.]
REISSMANN, AUGUST, musician and writer
on music, born Nov. 14, 1825, at Frankenstein,
Silesia, was grounded in music by Jung, the
Cantor of his native town. In 1843 he removed
to Breslau, and there had instruction from
Mosewius, Baumgart, Ernst Richter, Liistner,
and Kohl, in various branches, including piano
forte, organ, violin, and cello. He at first pro
posed to become a composer, but a residence in
1850-52 at Weimar, where he came in contact
with the new school of music, changed his plans
and drove him to literature. His first book was
'From Bach to Wagner' (Berlin, 1861) ; rapidly
followed by a historical work on the German
song, 'Das deutsche Lied,' etc. (1861), rewritten
as ' Geschichte des Deutschen Liedes' (1874).
This again was succeeded by his General History
of Music — 'Allg. Musikgeschichte ' (3 vols. 1864,
Leipzig), with a great number of interesting
examples; and that by ' Compositionslehre ' (3
vols. Berlin, 1866-70). His recent works have
been of a biographical nature, attempts to show
the gradual development of the life and genius
of the chief musicians — Schumann (1865), Men
delssohn (1867), Schubert (1873), Haydn (1879).
All books about these great men are inter
esting, especially when written by practical and
intelligent musicians; and Dr. Reissmann's are
illustrated by copious examples (in Schubert's
case from MS. sources), which much increase
their value. In 1877 he published a volume of
lectures on the history of music, delivered in the
Conservator! um of Berlin, where he has resided
since 1863. His chief employment since 1871
has been the completion of the ' Musik Conver-
sationslexikon,' in which he succeeded Mendel
as editor, after the death of the latter. The
nth volume, completing the work, appeared in
1879, and it will long remain as the most com
prehensive Lexicon of music. Dr. Reissmann
unfortunately thought it necessary to oppose the
establishment of the Royal High School for
RELATION.
Music at Berlin in 1875, and to enforce his
opposition by a bitter pamphlet, which however
has long since been forgotten. [See MUSIK,
KONIGLICHE HOCHSCHULE FUR, vol. ii. p. 4376.]
As a practical musician Dr. Reissmann has been
almost as industrious as he has been in literature.
The list given in the Lexicon comprises 2 grand
operas and one comic ditto ; an oratorio ; 2 dra
matic scenes for solos, male chorus, and orchestra ;
a concerto and a suite for solo violin and or
chestra ; 2 sonatas for pianoforte and violin ; and
a great quantity of miscellaneous pieces for piano
solo and for the voice — in all nearly 50 published
works. He is now (1881) at Leipzig, editing an
Illustrated History of German music. [G.]
RELATION is a general term implying con
nection between two or more objects of consider
ation, through points of similarity and contrast. In
other words, it is the position which such objects
appear to occupy when considered with reference
to one another. It is defined by its context.
The relations of individual notes to one another
may be described in various ways. For instance,
they may be connected by belonging to or being
prominent members of the diatonic series of any
one key, and contrasted in various degrees by
the relative positions they occupy in that series.
A further simple relation is established by mere
proximity, such as may be observed in the
relations of grace-notes, appoggiaturas, turns,
and shakes to the essential notes which they
adorn ; and this is carried so far that notes alien
to the harmony and even to the key are freely
introduced, and are perfectly intelligible when
in close connection with characteristic diatonic
notes. The relations of disjunct notes may be
found, among other ways, by their belonging to
a chord which is easily called to mind ; whence
the successive sounding of the constituents of
familiar combinations is easily realised as melody;
while melody which is founded upon less obvious
relations is not so readily appreciated.
The relations of chords may be either direct or
indirect. Thus they may have several notes in
common, as in Ex. I, or only one, as in Ex. 2,
Ex. 1. Ex. 2. Ex. 8.
to make simple direct connection, while the diver
sity of their derivations, or their respective de
grees of consonance and dissonance, afford an
immediate sense of contrast. Or they may be
indirectly connected through an implied chord or
note upon which they might both converge ; as
the common chord of D to that of C through G,
to which D is Dominant, while G in its turn is
Dominant to C (Ex. 3). The relation thus es
tablished is sufficiently clear to allow the major
chord of the supertonic and its minor seventh
and major and minor ninth to be systematically
affiliated in the key, though its third and minor
ninth are not in the diatonic series.
RELATION.
A further illustration of the relations of
chords is afforded by those of the Dominant and
Tonic. They are connected by their roots being
a fifth apart, which is the simplest interval,
except the octave, in music ; but their other com
ponents are entirely distinct, as is the compound
tone of the roots, since none of their lower and
more characteristic harmonics are coincident.
They thus represent the strongest contrast in
the diatonic series of a key, and when taken
together define the tonality more clearly than any
other pair of chords in its range.
The relations of keys are traced in a similar
manner ; as, for instance, by the tonic and perfect
fifth of one being in the diatonic series of another,
or by the number of notes which are common to
both. The relations of the keys of the minor third
and minor sixth to the major mode (as of Eb and
Ab with reference to C) are rendered intelligible
through the minor mode ; but the converse does
not hold good, for the relations of keys of the major
mediant or submediant to the minor mode (as of
E minor and A minor with reference to C minor)
are decidedly remote, and direct transition to them
is not easy to follow. In fact the modulatory
tendency of the minor mode is towards the con
nections of its relative major rather than to those
of its actual major, while the outlook of the
major mode is free on both sides. The relation
of the key of the Dominant to an original Tonic
is explicable on much the same grounds as that
of the chords of those notes. The Dominant key
is generally held to be a very satisfactory com
plementary or contrast in the construction of a
piece of music of any sort, but it is not of uni
versal cogency. For instance, at the very out
set of any movement it is almost inevitable that
the Dominant harmony should early and empha
tically present itself; hence when a fresh section
is reached it is sometimes desirable to find another
contrast to avoid tautology. With some such
purpose the keys of the mediant or. submediant
have at times been chosen, both of which afford
interesting phases of contrast and connection ;
the connection being mainly the characteristic
major third of the original tonic, and the contrast
being emphasised by the sharpening of the Dom
inant in the first case, and of the Tonic in the
second. The key of the subdominant is avoided
in such cases because the contrast afforded by it
is not sufficiently strong to have force in the total
impression of the movement.
The relations of the parts of any artistic work
are in a similar manner those of contrast within
limits of proportion and tonality. For instance,
those of the first and second section in what is
called ' first movement ' or ' sonata ' form are
based on the contrast of complementary tonal
ities as part of the musical structure, on the one
hand ; and on contrast of character and style in
the idea on the other ; which between them
establish the balance of proportion. The rela
tion of the second main division — the ' working-
out' section — to the first part of the movement is
that of greater complexity and freedom in con
trast to regularity and definiteness of musical
RELATION.
105
structure, and fanciful discussion of characteristic
portions of the main subjects in contrast to formal
exposition of complete ideas ; and the final section
completes the cycle by returning to regularity in
the recapitulation.
The relations of the various movements of a
large work to one another are of similar nature.
The earliest masters who wrote Suites and Senate
di Camera or di Chiesa had but a rudimentary
and undeveloped sense of the relative contrasts
of keys ; consequently they contented themselves
with connecting the movements by putting them
all in the same key, and obtained their contrasts
by alternating quick and slow movements or
dances, and by varying the degrees of their seri
ousness or liveliness: but the main outlines of the
distribution of contrasts are* in these respects
curiously similar to the order adopted in the
average modern Sonata or Symphony. Thus they
placed an allegro of a serious or solid character
at or near the beginning of the work, as typified
by the Allemande ; the slow or solemn movement
came in the middle, as typified by the Sarabande ;
and the conclusion was a light and gay quick
movement, as typified by the Gigue. And further,
the manner in which a Gourante usually followed
the Allemande, and a Gavotte or Bourre'e or
Passepied, or some such dance, preceded the final
Gigue, has its counterpart in the Minuet or
Scherzo of a modern work, which occupies an
analogous position with respect either to the slow
er last movement. In modern works the force of
additional contrast is obtained by putting central
movements in different but allied keys to that of
the first and last movements; the slow movement
most frequently being in the key of the Sub-
dominant. At the same time additional bonds
of connection are sometimes obtained, both by
making the movements pass without complete
break from one to another, and in some cases
(illustrated by Beethoven and Schumann especi
ally) by using the same characteristic features or
figures in different movements.
The more subtle relations of proportion, both
in the matter of the actual length of the various
movements and their several sections, and in the
breadth of their style ; in the congruity of their
forms of expression and of the quality of the
emotions they appeal to ; in the distribution of
the qualities of tone, and even of the groups of
harmony and rhythm, are all of equal import
ance, though less easy either to appreciate or to
effect, as they demand higher degrees of artistic
power and perception; and the proper adjust
ment of such relations are as vital to operas,
oratorios, cantatas, and all other forms of vocal
music, as to the purely instrumental forms.
The same order of relations appears in all
parts of the art ; for instance, the alternation of
discord and concord is the same relation, implying
contrast and connection, analogous to the relation,
between suspense or expectation and its relief;
and to speak generally, the art of the composer
is in a sense the discovery and exposition of
intelligible relations in the mutifarious material
at his command, and a complete explanation of
106
RELATION.
the word would amount to a complete theory of
music. [C.H.H.P.]
RELFE, JOHN — whose father, Lupton Relfe
(died, Oct. 1805), was f°r fifty years organist of
Greenwich Hospital — was born about 1 766. He
received his first instruction from his father, and
at eighteen was articled to Keeble, organist of
St. George's, Hanover Square. About 1810 he
was appointed one of the King's band of music.
He had much reputation as a teacher of the
pianoforte, and composed some sonatas, a popu
lar ballad, 'Mary's Dream,' and other pieces.
In 1 798 he published ' The Principles of Har
mony,' in which nearly the whole theoretical
plan of Logier, so far as it was connected with
offering elementary instruction through the
medium of exercises, was anticipated. He was
also author of 'Remarks on the Present State
of Musical Instruction,' 1819, and 'Lucidus
Ordo,' an attempt to divest thorough-bass and
composition of their intricacies, 1819. He died
about 1837. [W.H.H.]
RELLSTAB. Two remarkable people, father
and son. The father, JOHANN KAKL FRIEDRICH,
was one of those active intellects who are so
influential in their locality ; he was born in Berlin
Feb. 27, 1759. His father, a printer, wished him
to succeed to the business, but from boyhood his
whole thoughts were devoted to music. He was
on the point of starting for Hamburg to complete
his studies with Emmanuel Bach when the death
of his father forced him to take up the business.
He then added a music printing and publishing
branch ; was the first to establish a musical lend
ing library (1783); founded a Concert-Society,
on the model of Killer's at Leipzig, and called it
'Concerts for connoisseurs and amateurs,' an un
usually distinctive title for those days. The first
concert took place April 1 6, 1787, at the Englische
Haus, and in course of time the following works
were performed: — Salieri's 'Armida,' Schulz's
'Athalia,' Naumann's 'Cora,' Basse's 'Conver-
sione di San Agostino,' Bach's 'Magnificat,' and
Gluck's ' Alceste,' which was thus first introduced
to Berlin. The Society at last merged in the Sing-
akademie. He wrote musical critiques for the
Berlin paper, signed with his initials ; and had
concerts every other Sunday during the winter at
his own house, at which such works as Haydn's
'Seasons' were performed; but these meetings
were stopped by the entry of the French in 1806,
when he frequently had 20 men, and a dozen
horses quartered on him ; lost not only his music
but all his capital, and had to close his printing-
press. In time, he resumed his concerts ; in 1 809
gave lectures on harmony; in 1811 travelled to
Italy, and his letters in Voss's newspaper first
drew attention to Fraulein Milder, and thus
brought about her invitation to Berlin. Not long
after his return he was struck with apoplexy while
walking at Charlottenburg, Aug. 19, 1813, and
found dead on the road some hours afterwards.
As a composer he left 3 cantatas, a ' Passion,'
a Te Deum, and a Mass. Also an opera ; songs
too numerous to specify ; vocal scores of Graun's
RELLSTAB.
'Tod Jesu,' and Gluck's ' Iphigenie '; a German
libretto of Gluck's ' Orphe"e ' apparently from his
own pen. Of instrumental music he published —
marches for PF., symphonies and overtures; a
series of pieces with characteristic titles, 'Ob
stinacy,' 'Sensibility,' etc.; 24 short pieces for
PF., violin and bass, etc. Also A 'Treatise
on Declamation'; 'A Traveller's observations on
church-music, concerts, operas, and chamber-music
at the Palace in Berlin' (i 789); and 'A guide to
Bach's system of fingering for the use of pianists'
(1790). These works, for the most part biblio
graphical curiosities, are very instructive.
Rellstab had three daughters, of whom CARO
LINE, born April 18, 1793 or 94, was a singer, dis
tinguished for her extraordinary compass. His son,
HEINRICH FRIEDRICH LUDWIG, born April 13,
1799, in Berlin, though delicate in health, and
destined for practical music, was compelled by
the times to join the army, where he became
ensign and lieutenant. In 1816, after the peace,
he took lessons on the piano from Ludwig
Berger, and in 1819 and 20 studied theory with
Bernhard Klein. At the same time he taught
mathematics and history in the Brigadeschule
till 1821, when he retired from the army to
devote himself to literature. He also composed
much part-music for the 'jiingere Liedertafel'
which he founded in conjunction with G. Rei-
chardt in 1819, wrote a libretto, 'Dido,' for B.
Klein, and contributed to Marx's ' Musikzeitung.'
A pamphlet on Madame Sontag procured him 3
months' imprisonment in 1825, on account of its
satirical allusions to a well-known diplomatist.
In 1826 he joined the staff of Voss's newspaper,
and in a short time completely led the public
opinion on music in Berlin. His first article was
a report on a performance of 'Euryanthe,' Oct. 31,
1826, followed on Nov. 13 by another on a soiree
at the Jagor Hall, at which Mendelssohn played
Beethoven's 9th Symphony on the piano, and
thus introduced that gigantic work to Berlin.
Twenty -two years later Rellstab wrote : —
That evening made an indelible impression on my
mind, and the recollection of it is as fresh as of an event
of yesterday— nay of to-day. The most accomplished
musicians of Berlin, including Berger and Klein, were
present. The wonderful, almost awe-inspiring wcrk,
exacted the homage due to it, but the attention of all
present was rivetted upon the young artist dealing with
unmistakeable mastery with that mighty score, as I
related at the time, though in far too measured terms,
my pen being then unpractised. His eager glance took
in the whole of each page, his ear ' penetrated like a
gimlet ' (to use an expression of Zel ter's) into the very
essence of the music, his fingers never erred.
Two years later he wrote a cantata for Hum-
boldt's congress of physicists, which Mendelssohn
set to music.
Rellstab was a warm supporter of classical
music, and strongly condemned all undue at
tempts at effect. He quarrelled with Spontini
over his 'Agnes von Hohenstauffen ' (Berlin
'Musikalische Zeitung' for 1827, Nos. 23, 24,
26, and 29), and the controversy was maintained
with much bitterness until Spontini left Berlin,
when Rellstab, in his pamphlet 'Ueber mein
Verhaltniss als Kritiker zu Herm Spontini,'
acknowledged that he had gone too far.
RELLSTAB.
Rellstab's novels and essays are to be found
for the most part in his ' Gesammelte Schriften '
24 vols. (Leipzig, Brockhaus). A musical peri
odical, ' Iris im Reiche der Tonktmst,' founded by
him in 1830, survived till 1842. His recollections
of Berger, Schroeder - Devrient, Mendelssohn,
Klein, Dehn, and Beethoven (whom he visited
in March 1825) will be found in 'Aus meinem
Leben ' (2 vols. Berlin, 1861). He was thoroughly
eclectic in his taste for music, and, though not an
unconditional supporter, was no opponent of the
modern school of Liszt and Wagner. He died
during the night of Nov. 27, 1860. [E.G.]
REMENYI, EDUARD, a famous violinist, was
born in 1830 at Hewes (according to another
account at Miskolc") in Hungary, and received
his musical education at the Vienna Conservatoire
during the years 1842-1845, where his master
on the violin was Joseph Bb'hm, the same who
instructed Joachim. In 1848 he took an active
part in the insurrection, and became adjutant to
the famous general Gorgey, under whom he took
part in the campaign against Austria. After
the revolution had been crushed he had to fly his
country, and went to America, where he resumed
his career as a virtuoso. In 1853 he went to
Liszt in Weimar, who at once recognised his
genius and became his artistic guide and friend.
In the following year he came to London and
was appointed solo violinist to the Queen. In
1860 he obtained his amnesty and returned to
Hungary, where some time afterwards he received
from the Emperor of Austria a similar distinction
to that granted him in England. After his return
home he seems to have retired for a time from
public life, living chiefly on an estate he owned in
Hungary. In 1865 he appeared for the first time
in Paris, where he created a perfect furore in the
salons of the aristocracy. Repeated artistic tours
in Germany, Holland, and Belgium further tended
to spread his fame. In 1875 he settled temporarily
in Paris, and in the summer of 1877 came to
London, where also he produced a sensational
effect in private circles. The season being far
advanced he appeared in public only once, at Mr.
Mapleson's benefit concert at the Crystal Palace,
where he played a fantasia on themes from the
'Huguenots.' In the autumn of 1878 he again
visited London, and played at the Promenade
Concerts, He was on his way to America, where
he has been giving concerts for the last three
years and still resides (1881). As an artist
M. Remenyi combines perfect mastery over the
technical difficulties of his instrument with a
strongly pronounced poetic individuality. His
soul is in his playing, and his impulse carries him
away with it as he warms to his task, the impres
sion produced on the audience being accordingly
in an ascending scale. He never tires, and one
never tires of him. The stormier pieces of
Chopin transferred by him from the piano to the
violin are given by Reme'nyi with overpowering
effect. But tenderer accents are not wanting;
the nocturnes of Chopin and Field, arranged in
the same way, he gives with the suavest dreami
ness, interrupted at intervals only by accents of
RE PASTORE.
107
passion. Another important feature in Reme'nyi'a
playing is the national element. He strongly
maintains against Liszt the genuineness of Hun
garian music, and has shown himself thoroughly
imbued with that spirit by writing several ' Hun
garian melodies,' which have been mistaken for
popular tunes and adopted as such by other com
posers. The same half-Eastern spirit is ob
servable in the strong rhythmical accentuation of
Remenyi's style, so rarely attained by artists of
Teutonic origin. For this and other reasons the
arrangements of Chopin's mazurkas and similar
pieces are more congenial to him than the
classical works of Beethoven, Schumann, Men
delssohn, which, as a matter of course, are in his
re'pertoire. Altogether his genius will be most
appreciated in a drawing-room, where his marked
individuality is felt more immediately than
in a large concert-hall. Reme'nyi's fame is ac
cordingly of a somewhat peculiar kind. It re
sembles that of our non-exhibiting painters.
Most English amateurs have heard his name
and know that he ranks amongst the leading
artists of the day, but few can vouch for the
general impression by their personal experience.
Moreover, Remenyi is of too migratory a nature
to follow up his success in any given place. He
is the wandering musician par excellence, and at
intervals, when the whim takes him, will disap
pear from public view altogether. But although
somewhat of the nature of a comet, he is un
doubtedly a star of the first magnitude in his
own sphere. Reme'nyi's compositions are of no
importance, being mostly confined to arrange
ments for his instrument and other pieces written
for his own immediate use.
REMPLISSAGE, 'filling up.' A term some
times met with in musical criticism, which means
what is colloquially called ' padding,' or passages —
generally of a florid and modulatory character — •
put by composers of inferior degree into their
compositions, whether from barrenness of ideas,
or from want of skill in using those they have,
whereby the bulk of the work is increased, but
not its interest or value. [J.A.F.M.1
RENDANO, ALFONSO, born April 5, 1853, at
Carolei, near Cosenza, studied first at the Con-
servatorio at Naples, then with Thalberg, and
lastly at the Leipzig Conservatorium. He played
at the Gewandhaus with marked success on Feb.
8, 1872. He then visited Paris and London, per
formed at the Musical Union (April 30, 1872), the
Philharmonic (March 9, 73), the Crystal Palace,
and other concerts, and much in society; and
after a lengthened stay returned to Italy. He
was a graceful and refined player, with a delicate
touch, a great command over the mechanism of
the piano, and a pleasing melancholy in his ex
pression. His playing of Bach was especially
good. He has published some piano pieces of no
importance. [G.]
RE PASTORE, IL. A dramatic cantata to
Metastasio's words (with compressions), com
posed by Mozart at Salzburg in 1775, in honour
of the Archduke Maximilian. First performed
108
RE PASTORE.
April 23, 1775. It contains an overture and
14 numbers. The autograph is in the Royal
Library at Berlin, and the work is published in
Breitkopf's complete edition as Series V. No. 10.
Aminta's air, ' L'amerb,' was at one time a
favourite with Madame Lind-Goldschmidt. [G.]
REPEAT, REPETIZIONE, REPLICA (Ger.
Wiederholung ; Fr. Repetition, which also means
' rehearsal'). In the so-called sonata-form, there
are certain sections which are repeated, and
are either written out in full twice over, or are
at the
written only once, with the sign — H
end, which shows that the music is to be repeated
either from the beginning or from the previous
occurrence of the sign. The sections which, ac
cording to the strict rule, are repeated, are — the
first section of the first movement, both sections
of the minuet or scherzo at their first appear
ance, and both sections of the trio, after which
the minuet or scherzo is gone once straight through
without repeats. The last half of the first move
ment, and the first, or even both, of the sections
in the last movement, may be repeated ; see for
instance Beethoven's Sonatas Op. 2, No. 2; Op. 10,
No. 2 ; Op. 78 ; Schubert's Symphony No. 9. Also,
where there is an air and variations, both sections
of the air and of all the variations, should, strictly
speaking, be repeated. Although it is a regular
custom not to play the minuet or scherzo, after the
trio, with repeats, Beethoven thinks fit to draw
attention to the fact that it is to be played straight
through, by putting after the trio the words 'Da
Capo senza repetizione,' or ' senza replica,' in one
or two instances, as in Op. 10, No. 3, where more
over the trio is not divided into two sections, and
is not repeated; in Op. 27, No. 2, where the
Allegretto is marked ' La prima parte senza re
petizione ' (the first part without repeat). In his
4th and 7th Symphonies he has given the trio
twice over each time with full repeats. [J. A.F.M.]
REPETITION (PIANOFORTE). The rapid
reiteration of a note is called repetition ; a
special touch of the player facilitated by me
chanical contrivances in the pianoforte action ;
the earliest and most important of these having
been the invention of SEBASTIAN ERARD. [See the
diagram and description of Erard's action under
PIANOFORTE, vol. ii. p. 722.] By such a con
trivance the hammer, after the delivery of a blow,
remains poised, or slightly rises again, so as to allow
the hopper to fall back and be ready to give a
second impulse to the hammer before the key has
nearly recovered its position of rest. The parti
cular advantages of repetition to grand pianos have
been widely acknowledged by pianoforte makers,
and much ingenuity has been spent in inventing
or perfecting repetition actions for them : in up
right pianos however the principle has been rarely
employed, although its influence has been felt
and shown by care in the position of the ' check '
in all check action instruments. The French have
named the mechanical power to rapidly repeat a
note, 'double echappement '; the drawbacks to
double escapement— which the repetition really
REPETITION.
is— are found in increased complexity of me
chanism and liability to derangement. These
may be overrated, but there always remains the
drawback of loss of tone in repeated notes ; the
repetition blow being given from a small depth
of touch compared with the normal depth, is
not so elastic and cannot be delivered with
so full a forte, or with a piano or pianissimo of
equally telling vibration. Hence, in spite of the
great vogue given to repetition effects by Herz
and Thalberg, other eminent players have dis
regarded them, or have even been opposed to
repetition touches, as Chopin was and L)r. Hans
von Billow is — see p. 7, § 10 of his commentary
on selected studies by Chopin (Aibl, Munich,
i88o\ where he designates double escapement
as a ' deplorable innovation.'
A fine example of the best use of repetition
is in Thalberg' s A minor Study, op. 45 : —
o
s
dm*-
R.H.
^
•1 • ol
etc.
X.H.
where the player, using the first two fingers
and thumb in rapid succession on each note,
produces by these triplets almost the effect of
a sustained melody with a tremolo. It is this
effect, produced by mechanical means only, that
is heard in Signer Caldera's MELOPIANO as made
by Herz in Paris, and Kirkman in London.
Repetition is however an old device with stringed
instruments, having been, according to Bunting,
a practice with the Irish harpers, as we know
it was with the common dulcimer, the Italian
mandoline and the Spanish bandurria.
A remarkable instance may be quoted of the
effective use of repetition in the Fugato (piano
solo) from Liszt's 'Todtentanz' (Danse Macabre)
Vivace.
REPETITION.
But there need be no difficulty in playing this
on a well-regulated and checked single escape
ment. With a double escapement the nicety of
checking is not so much required. [A. J.H.]
REPRISE, repetition ; a term which is occa
sionally applied to any repetition in music, but is
most conveniently confined to the recurrence of
the first subj/ect of a movement after the conclu
sion of the working out or Durchfuhrung. In
that sense it is used in this work. [G.]
REQUIEM (Lat. Missa pro Defunctis ; Ital.
Messa per i Defonti; Fr. Hesse des Morts;
Germ. Todtenmesse). A solemn Mass, sung, an
nually, in Commemoration of the Faithful De
parted, on All Souls' Day (Nov. 2) ; and, with
a less general intention, at Funeral Services,
on the anniversaries of the decease of particular
persons, and on such other occasions as may be
dictated by feelings of public respect, or indi
vidual piety.
The Requiem takes its name1 from the first
word of the Introit — 'Requiem eeternam dona
eis, Domine.' When set to Music, it naturally
arranges itself in nine principal sections : (i) The
Introit — ' Requiem teternam ' ; (2) the ' Kyrie ' ;
(3) the Gradual, and Tract — ' Requiem aeter-
nam,' and 'Absolve, Domine ' ; (4) The Sequence
or Prose — 'Dies irse'; (5) The Offertorium —
' Domine Jesu Christi' ; (6) the 'Sanctus ' ; (7) the
'Benedictus'; (8) the 'Agnus Dei' ; and (9) the
Communio — 'Lux seterna.' To these are some
times added (10) the Responsorium, 'Liberame,'
which, though not an integral portion of the
Mass, immediately follows it, on all solemn oc-
,. casions; and (n) the Lectio* — 'Tsedet animam
'• meam,' of which we possess at least one example
• of great historical interest.
The Plain Chaunt Melodies adapted to the
nine divisions of the Mass will be found in the
Gradual; together with that proper for the
Responsorium. The Lectio, which really belongs
to a different Service, has no proper Melody, but
is sung to the ordinary ' Tonus Lectionis.' [See
ACCENTS.] The entire series of Melodies is of
rare beauty ; and produces so solemn an effect,
when sung, in Unison, by a large body of Grave
Equal Voices, that most of the great Polyphonic
Composers have employed its phrases more freely
than usual, in their Requiem Masses, either as
Canti fermi, or, in the form of unisonous
passages interposed between the harmonised
portions of the work. Compositions of this kind
are not very numerous ; but most of the examples
we possess must be classed among the most
perfect productions of their respective authors.
Palestrina's 'Missa pro Defunctis,' for 5 Voices,
first printed at Rome in 1591, in the form of a
supplement to the Third Edition of his ' First
Book of Masses,' was reproduced in 1841 by
Alfieri, in the first volume of his 'Raccolta di Mu
sica Sacra'; again, by Lafage, in a valuable Svo.
volume, entitled ' Cinq Messes de Palestrina ' ; 2
1 That is to say, its name as a special Mass. The Music of the
ordinary Polyphonic Mass always bears the name of the Canto feimo
on which it is founded.
2 Paris, Launer et Cie. ;. London, Bchott A Co.
REQUIEM.
109
and by the Prince de la Moskowa in the gth
volume of his collection [see p. 31 of the present
vol.], and has since been advertised, by Messrs.
Breitkopf & Hartel, of Leipzig, as part of the
contents of their complete edition. This beautiful
work is, unhappily, very incomplete, consisting
only of the ' Kyrie/ the ' Offertorium ,' the ' Sanctus,'
the ' Benedictus,' and the ' Agnus Dei.' We must
not, however, suppose that the Composer left his
work unfinished. It was clearly his intention
that the remaining Movements should be sung, in
accordance with a custom still common at Roman
Funerals, in unisonous Plain Chaunt : and, as a
fitting conclusion to the whole, he has left us two
settings of the 'Libera me,' in both of which the
Gregorian Melody is treated with an indescribable
intensity of pathos.3 One of these is preserved, in
MS., among the Archives of the Pontifical Chapel,
and the other, among those of the Lateran Basilica.
After a careful comparison of the two, Baini ar
rived at the conclusion that that belonging to
the Sistine Chapel must have been composed very
nearly at the same time as, and probably as an
adjunct to, the five printed Movements, which are
also founded, more or less closely, upon the original
Canti fermi, and so constructed as to bring their
characteristic beauties into the highest possible
relief — in no case, perhaps, with more touching
effect than in the opening ' Kyrie,' the first few
bars of which will be found at page 78 of our
second volume.
Next in importance to Palestrina's Requiem,
is a very grand one, for 6 Voices, composed by
Vittoria, for the Funeral of the Empress Maria,
widow of Maximilian II. This fine work — un
doubtedly the greatest triumph of Vittoria's
genius — comprises all the chief divisions of the
Mass, except the Sequence, together with the
Responsorium, and Lectio ; and brings the Plain
Chaunt Subjects into prominent relief, through
out. It was first published, at Madrid, in 1605
— the year of its production. In 1869 the Lectio-
was reprinted at Ratisbon, by Joseph Schrems,
in continuation of Proske's ' Musica divina.' A
later cahier of the same valuable collection con
tains the Mass and Responsorium ; both edited
by Haberl, with a conscientious care which would
leave nothing to be desired, were it not for the
altogether needless transposition with which
the work is disfigured, from beginning to end.
The original volume contains one more Move
ment — 'Versa est in luctum' — which has never
been reproduced in modern notation ; but, as
this has now no place in the Roman Funeral
Service, its omission is not so much to be re
gretted.
Some other very fine Masses for the Dead,
by Francesco Anerio, Orazio Vecchi, and Giov.
Matt. Asola, are included in the same collection,
together with a somewhat pretentious work, by
Pitoni, which scarcely deserves the enthusiastic
eulogium bestowed upon it by Dr. Proske. A
far finer Composition, of nearly similar date, is
Colonna's massive Requiem for 8 Voices, first
printed at Bologna in 1684 — a copy of which
3 See Alfieri, ' Raccolta dl Musica Sacra.' Tom. vii.
110
REQUIEM.
is preserved in the Library of the Sacred Har
monic Society.
Our repertoire of modern Requiem Masses, if
not numerically rich, is sufficiently so, in quality,
to satisfy the most exacting critic. Three only
of its treasures have attained a deathless reputa
tion; but, these are of such superlative excel
lence, that they may be fairly cited as examples
of the nearest approach to sublimity of style that
the i Qth century has as yet produced.
(l.) The history of Mozart's last work is sur
rounded by mysteries which render it scarcely less
interesting to the general reader than the Music
itself is to the student. Thanks to the attention
drawn to it by recent writers, the narrative is
now so well known, that it is needless to do
more than allude to those portions of it which
tend to assist the critic in his analysis of the
Composition. Its outline is simple enough. In
the month of July, 1791, Mozart was com
missioned to write a Requiem, by a mysterious-
looking individual, whom, in the weakness con
sequent upon his failing health and long-con
tinued anxiety, he mistook for a visitant from
the other world. It is, now, well known that
the ' Stranger ' was, really, a certain Herr
Leutgeb, steward to Graf Franz von Walsegg,
a nobleman residing at Stuppach, who, having
lately lost his wife, proposed to honour her
memory by foisting upon the world, as his own
Composition, the finest Funeral Mass his money
could procure. This, however, did not tran
spire until long after Mozart's death. Suspect
ing no dishonourable intention on the part of
his visitor, he accepted the commission ; and
strove to execute it, with a zeal so far beyond
his strength, that worn out with over-work and
anxieties, and tormented by the idea that he was
writing the Music for his own Funeral, he died
while the MS. still remained unfinished. His
widow, fearing that she might be compelled to
refund the money already paid for the work in ad
vance, determined to furnish the 'Stranger' with
a perfect copy, at any risk ; and, in the hope of
accomplishing this desperate purpose, entrusted
the MS., first, to the Hofkapellmeister, Jos. von
Eybler, and afterwards to Franz Xavier Siiss-
mayer, for completion. Von Eybler, after a few
weak attempts, gave up the task in despair.
Sussmayer -was more fortunate. He had watched
the progress of the Requiem through each suc
cessive stage of its development. Mozart had
played its various Movements to him on the
Pianoforte, had sung them with him over and
over again, and had even imparted to him his
latest ideas on the subject, a few hours, only,
before his death. Sussmayer was an accomplished
Musician, intimately acquainted with Mozart's
method of working : and it would have been hard,
if, after having been thus unreservedly admitted
into the dying Composer's confidence, he had
been unable to fill up his unfinished sketches with
sufficient closeness of imitation to set the widow's
fears of detection at rest. He did in fact, place
in her hands a complete Requiem, which Count
Walsegg accepted, in the full belief that it
REQUIEM.
was in Mozart's handwriting throughout. The
' Requiem ' and ' Kyrie ' were really written by
Mozart ; but the remainder was skilfully copied
from sketches — now generally known as the
' Urschriften ' — which, everywhere more or less
unfinished, were carefully filled in, as nearly as
possible in accordance with the Composer's
original intention. The widow kept a transcript
of this MS., and afterwards sold it to Messrs.
Breitkopf & Hartel, of Leipzig, who printed it,
in full score, in 1800. But, notwithstanding the
secrecy with which the affair had been con
ducted, rumours were already afloat, calculated
to throw grave doubts upon the authenticity of
the work. Sussmayer, in reply to a communica
tion addressed to him by Messrs. Breitkopf &
Hartel, laid claim to the completion of the
'Requiem,' 'Kyrie,' 'Dies irse,' and 'Domine,'
— of which he said that Mozart had ' fully com
pleted the four Vocal Parts, and the Fundamental
Bass, with the Figuring, but only here and there
indicated the motivi for the Instrumentation,' —
and asserted that the 'Sanctus,' 'Benedictus,'
and 'Agnus Dei,' were entirely composed by
himself (ganz nea von mir verfertigt). This bold
statement, however, did not set the dispute at
rest. It was many times revived, with more or
less acerbity; until, in 1825, Gottfried Weber
brought matters to a climax, by publishing a
virulent attack upon the Requiem, which he
denounced as altogether unworthy of Mozart,
and attributed almost entirely to Sussmayer.
To follow the ensuing controversy through its
endless ramifications would far exceed our present
limits. Suffice it to say, that we are now in
possession of all the evidence, documentary or
otherwise, which seems at all likely to be brought
forward on either side. With the assistance of
Mozart's widow (then Madame von Nissen),
Joh. Andre', of Offenbach, published, in 1826,
a new edition of the Score, based upon that
previously printed by Messrs. Breitkopf & Hartel,
but corrected, by careful comparison, in the
presence of the Abbs' Stadler, with that originally
furnished to the Graf von Walsegg, and marked, on
the Abbe"s authority, with the letters, ' M.' and
' S.' to distinguish the parts composed by Mozart
from those added by Sussmayer. In 1829, Herr
Andre' conferred another benefit upon the artistic
world by publishing, with the widow's per
mission, Mozart's original sketches of the 'Dies
irse,' ' Tuba mirum,' and ' Hostias,' exactly as the
Composer left them. All these publications are
still in print, together with another Score, lately
published by Messrs. Breitkopf & Hartel in
their complete edition of Mozart, in which the dis
tinction between Mozart's work and Sussmayer's
is very clearly indicated, as in Andre's earlier edi
tion, by the letters ' M.' and 'S.' Happily, the
original MSS. are now in safe keeping, also. In
1834, the Abbs' Stadler bequeathed the autograph
sketch of tbe entire ' Dies irse,' with the exception
of the last Movement, to the Imperial Library
at Vienna. Hofkapellmeister von Eybler soon
afterwards presented the corresponding MSS.
of the ' Lacrymosa,' the ' Doruine Jesu,' and
REQUIEM.
the ' Hostias.' The collection of ' Urschriften,'
therefore, needed only the original autographs of
the 'Requiem' and 'Kyrie,' to render it com
plete. These MSS, alone, would have been a
priceless acquisition; but, in 1838, the, same
Library was still farther enriched by the purchase,
for 50 ducats, of the complete MS. originally
sold to Count von Walsegg ; and it is now con
clusively proved that the ' Requiem ' and ' Kyrie,'
with which this MS. begins, are the original
autographs needed to complete the collection of
' Urschriften ' ; and, that the remainder of the
work is entirely in the hand-writing of Stiss-
mayer. It is, therefore, quite certain, that,
whatever else he may have effected, Siissmayer
did not furnish the Instrumentation of the
'Requiem' and 'Kyrie,' as he claims to have
done.1
In criticising the merits of the Requiem as a
work of Art, it is necessary to weigh the import
of these now well-ascertained facts, very care
fully indeed, against the internal evidence af
forded by the Score itself. The strength of this
evidence has not, we think, received, as yet, full
recognition. Gottfried Weber, dazzled, perhaps,
by the hypothetic excellence of another Requiem
of his own production, roundly abused the
entire Composition, which he described as a dis
grace to the name of Mozart. Few other
Musicians would venture to adopt this view;
though many have taken exception to certain
features in the Instrumentation — more especially,
some Trombone passages in the ' Tuba mirum '
and ' Benedictus ' — even , in one case, to the
extent of doubting whether they may not have
been purposely introduced, as a mask, ' to screen
the fraud of an impostor.' Yet, strange to say,
the first of these very passages stands, in the
Vienna MS. in Mozart's own handwriting.3
k-. V
EEQUIEM.
Ill
/T\
Trombone Tenore, solo
Voce.
So
1
num.
S^^f-
£
_p — .
:£:
- - - ba mi-rum spar-gens
r r
±
• f!-
=r=
r
1 The full details of the remarkable history, which we have here
given in the form of a very rapid sketch, will be found in a delightful
little brochure, entitled ' The Story of Mozart's Requiem,' by William
Pole. F.R.S., Mus. Doc., Oxon. (NoreUo & Co.)
2 We make this statement on the authority of Messrs. Breitkopf &
Hfirtel's latest Score, having had no opportunity of verifying it, by
comparison with the original MS., before going to press.
so-num, Fer se-pul-chra regi -
* r r f ? r r 4
o - num, Coget
J r r i etc.
• , a
r
I* T^
_
f* r r
i r r \—
-» i- r
i 1
i ' ' ' i
Such passages as these, though they may, per
haps, strengthen Siissmayer's claim to have filled
in certain parts of the Instrumentation, stand on
a very different ground to those which concern the
Composition of whole Movements. The ' Lacry-
mosa ' is, quite certainly, one of the most beau
tiful Movements in the whole Requiem — and
Mozart is credited with having only finished the
first 8 bars of it ! Yet it is impossible to study
this movement, carefully, without arriving at
Professor Macfarren's conclusion, that 'the whole
was the work of one mind, which mind was
Mozart's.' Siissmayer may have written it out,
perhaps ; but it must have been from the recol
lection of what Mozart had played, or sung to
him ; for, we know that this very Movement
occupied the dying Composer's attention, almost
to the last moment of his life. In like manner,
Mozart may have left no ' Urschriften ' of the
'Sanctus,' 'Benedictus,' and 'Agnus Dei' —
though the fact that they have never been dis
covered does not prove that they never existed —
and yet he may have played and sung these
Movements often enough to have given Siiss
mayer a very clear idea of what he intended to
write. We must either believe that he did this,
or that Siissmayer was as great a genius as he ; for
not one of Mozart's acknowledged Masses will
bear comparison with the Requiem, either as a
work of Art, or the expression of a devout religious
feeling. In this respect, it stands almost alone
among Instrumental Masses, which nearly always
sacrifice religious feeling to technical display.
(2.) Next in importance to Mozart's immortal
work are the two great Requiem Masses of Cheru-
bini. The first of these, in C minor, was written
for the Anniversary of the death of King Louis
XVI. (Jan. 21, 1793), and first sung, on that
occasion, at the Abbey Church of Saint-Denis, in
1817 ; after which it was not again heard until
Feb. 14, 1820, when it was repeated, in the same
Church, at the Funeral of the Due de Berri.
Berlioz regarded this as Cherubini's greatest
work. It is undoubtedly full of beauties. Its
general tone is one of extreme mournfulness, per
vaded, throughout, by deep religious feeling. Ex
cept in the ' Dies irae ' and ' Sanctus ' this style
is never exchanged for a more excited one ; and,
even then, the treatment can scarcely be called
dramatic. The deep pathos of the little Move
ment, interposed after the last ' Osanna,' to fulfil
the usual office of the 'Benedictus' — which is
here incorporated with the ' Sanctus * — exhibits
the Composer's power of appealing to the feelings
in its most affecting light.
112
EEQUIEM.
The second Eequiem, in D minor, for three
Male Voices, is. in many respects, a greater work
than the first ; though the dramatic element per
vades it so freely, that its character as a Reli
gious Service is sometimes entirely lost. It was
completed on Sept. 24, 1836, a few days after the
Composer had entered his 7 7th year ; and, with the
exception of the Sixth Quartet, and the Quintet
in E minor, was his last important work. The
' Dies irae ' was first sung at the Concert of the
Conservatoire, March 19, 1837, and repeated on
the 24th of the same month. On March 25, 1838,
the work was sung throughout. In the January
of that year, Mendelssohn had already recom
mended it to the notice of the Committee of
the Lower Rhine Festival; and, in 1872 and
1873, it was sung, as a Funeral Service, in the
Roman Catholic Chapel, in Farm Street, London.
It is doubtful whether Cherubini's genius ever
shone to greater advantage than in this gigantic
work. Every Movement is replete with interest ;
and the ' whirlwind of sound' which ushers in
the ' Dies irse ' produces an effect, which, once
heard, can never be forgotten.
Vivo.
^_^^_?M—r-
J_J
• — *.
M=
ff Di -
es
i - r
• —
etc.
p
1
(3.) It remains only to notice a work, which,
though a Requiem only in name, takes high rank
among the greatest productions of the present day.
The ' German Requiem ' of Johannes Brahms
is, in reality, a Sacred Cantata, composed to
words selected from Holy Scripture, in illustra
tion of the joys of the Blessed, and the glories of
the Life to Come. It prefers no claim to be
REQUIEM.
considered as a Religious Service, in any sense
of the word ; and must, therefore, be criticised,
like the great Mass of Sebastian Bach, as a
shorter form of Oratorio. So considered, it
is worthy of all praise ; and exhibits, through
out, a" striking originality, very far removed
from the eccentricity which sometimes passes
under that name, and too frequently consists
in the presentation of forms rejected by older
Composers by reason of their ugliness. The
general style is neither dramatic, nor sensu
ously descriptive: but, in his desire to shadow
forth the glories of a higher state of existence,
the Composer has availed himself of all the
latest resources of modern Music, including the
most complicated Orchestral Effects, and Choral
Passages of almost unconquerable difficulty. In
the first Movement, an indescribable richness of
tone is produced by the skilful management of
the Stringed Band, from which the violins are alto
gether excluded. In the Funeral March, a strange
departure from recognised custom is introduced,
in the use of Triple Time, which the Composer
has compelled to serve his purpose, so completely,
that the measured tramp of a vast Procession is
as clearly described, and as strongly forced upon
the hearer's attention, as it could possibly have
been by the ordinary means. The next division of
the work introduces two Choral Fugues, founded
upon Subjects which each embrace a compass of
eleven notes, and differ, in many very important
points, both of construction and treatment,
from the Motivi employed by other adepts in
this particular style of Composition. The Cre
scendo which separates these two Movements, is,
at the same time, one of the most beautiful, and
one of the most fearfully difficult passages in the
entire work. No. 4 is an exquisitely melodious
Slow Movement, in Triple Time ; and No. 5,
an equally attractive Soprano Solo and Chorus.
No. 6 is a very important section of the work,
comprising several distinct Movements, and de
scribing, with thrilling power, the awful events
connected with the Resurrection of the Dead.
Here, too, the f ugal treatment is very peculiar ;
the strongly characteristic Minor Second in the
Subject, being most unexpectedly represented by
a Major Second in the Answer. The Finale,
No. 7, concludes with a lovely reminiscence of
the First Movement, and brings the work to an
end, with a calm pathos which is the more effec
tive from its marked contrast with the stormy
and excited Movements by which it is preceded.
It is impossible to study this important Com
position in a truly impartial spirit without
arriving at the conclusion that its numerous
unusual features are introduced, not for the sake
of singularity, but, with an honest desire to pro
duce certain effects, which undoubtedly are pro
ducible, when the Chorus and Orchestra are equal
to the interpretation of the author's ideas. The
possibility of bringing together a sufficiently
capable Orchestra and Chorus has already been
fully demonstrated, both in England and in Ger
many. The ' Deutsches Requiem,' first produced
at Bremen, on Good Friday, 1 868, was first heard,
REQUIEM.
in this country, at the house of Lady Thompson,
London, July 7, 1871, Miss Began and Stock-
hausen singing the solos, and Lady Thompson
and Mr. Cipriani Potter playing the accompani
ment d quatre mains. It was next performed at
the Philharmonic Society's Concert, April 2, 1873,
and has since been most effectively given by
the Bach Choir, and the Cambridge University
Musical Society. The excellence of these per
formances plainly shows that the difficulties of
the work are not really insuperable. They may,
probably, transcend the power of an average coun
try Choral Society ; but we have heard enough to
convince us that they may be dealt with suc
cessfully by those who really care to overcome
them, and we are thus led to hope that after a
time the performance of the work may not be
looked upon as an unusual occurrence. [W.S.R.]
RESOLUTION is the process of relieving
dissonance by succeeding consonance. All dis
sonance is irritant and cannot be indefinitely
dwelt upon by the mind, but while it is heard
the return to consonance is awaited. To conduct
this return to consonance in such a manner that
the connection between the chords may be intel
ligible to the hearer is the problem of resolution.
The history of the development of harmonic
music shows that the separate idea of resolution
in the abstract need not have been present to
the earliest composers who introduced discords
into their works. They discovered circumstances
in which the flow of the parts, moving in con
sonance with one another, might be diversified
by retarding one part while the others moved on
a step, and then waited for that which was left
behind to catch them up. This process did not
invariably produce dissonance, but it did conduce
to variety in the independent motion of the
parts. The result, in the end, was to establish
the class of discords we call suspensions, and
their resolutions were inevitably implied by the
very principle on which the device is founded.
Thus when Josquin diversified a simple succes
sion of chords in what we call their first position,
as follows —
Ex.1.
RESOLUTION.
113
it seems sufficiently certain that no such idea as
resolving a discord was present to his mind. The
motion of D to C and of C to B was predeter
mined, and their being retarded was mainly a
happy way of obtaining variety in the flow of the
parts, though it must not be ignored that the
early masters had a full appreciation of the
actual function and effect of the few discords
they did employ.
Some time later the device of overlapping the
succeeding motions of the parts was discovered,
by allowing some or all of those which had gone
on in front to move again while the part which
VOL. III. PT. I.
had been left behind passed to its destination ;
as by substituting (b) for (a) in Ex. 2.
Ex.2.
P)
This complicated matters, and gave scope for
fresh progressions and combinations, but it did
not necessarily affect the question of resolution,
pure and simple, because the destination of the
part causing the dissonance was still predeter
mined. However, the gradually increasing fre
quency of the use of discords must have habituated
hearers to their effect and to the consideration
of the characteristics of different groups, and so
by degrees to their classification. The first
marked step in this direction was the use of the
Dominant seventh without preparation, which
showed at least a thorough appreciation of the
fact that some discords might have a more inde
pendent individuality than others. This appears
at first merely on this side, of occasionally dis
carding the formality of delaying the note out of
a preceding chord in order to introduce the
dissonance ; but it led also towards the consider
ation of resolution in the abstract, and ultimately
to greater latitude in the process of returning to
consonance. Both their instinct and the par
ticular manner in which the aspects of discords
presented themselves at first led the earlier com
posers to pass from a discordant note to the
nearest available note in the scale, wherever the
nature of the retardation did not obviously imply
the contrary; and this came by degrees to be
accepted as a tolerably general rule. Thus the
Dominant seventh is generally found to resolve on
the semitone below ; and this, combined with the
fact that the leading note was already in the chord
with the seventh, guided them to the relation of
Dominant and Tonic chords ; although they early
realised the possibility of resolving on other har
mony than that of the Tonic, on special occasions,
without violating the supposed law of moving the
seventh down a semitone or tone, according to the
mode, and raising the leading note to what would
have been the Tonic on ordinary occasions. How
ever, the ordinary succession became by degrees so
familiar that the Tonic chord grew to be regarded
as a sort of resolution in a lump of the mass of
any of the discords which were built on the top
of a Dominant major concord, as the seventh and
major or minor ninth, such as are now often called
Fundamental discords. Thus we find the follow
ing passage in a Haydn Sonata in D —
Ex. 3.
Ss=? — J 1 2 J ~
tftf frJ-fT-9—*—
(
fj -jgg-g^
.•vli. -^ '•- " "
- '• **j* r
jf
1 4
^N,^-,-
114
RESOLUTION.
in which the Dominant seventh is not resolved
by its passing to a near degree of the scale, but
by the mass of the harmony of the Tonic fol
lowing the mass of the harmony of the Dominant.
Ex. 4 is an example of a similar use by him of a
Dominant major ninth.
Ex. 4.
RESOLUTION.
Tonic; so that no actual harmony is heard in
the movement after the seventh has been sounded.
An example of treatment of an inversion of the
major ninth of the Dominant, which is as un
usual, is the following from Beethoven's last
Quartet, in F, op. 135.
Ex.7.
/U » J — =—
H-r-lH--
. —
vMy •
J^I>
Jlr
r I
-Ir +
1 etc.
&
*
t^r
There remain to be noted a few typical devices
by which resolutions are either varied or ela
borated. One which was more common in early
stages of harmonic music than at the present
day was the use of representative progressions,
which were in fact the outline of chords which
would have supplied the complete succession of
parts if they had been filled in. The following'
A more common way of dealing with the
resolution of such chords was to make the part
having the discordant note pass to another posi
tion in the same harmony before changing, and
allowing another part to supply the contiguous
note ; as in Ex. 5, from one of Mozart's Fantasias
in C minor.
Ex. 5. Ex. 5 a.
A In •r" • 1 Hi]
is a remarkable example from the Sarabande c
J. S. Bach's Partita in Bb.
Ex. 8. -w w __U._
-^-rtr-^-jiT jj ^ — i * 'ij "' \>t>, n~^n~"i^""J~
i i . etc
*^y u 8*5- t ' •! - ti i
i' i n #• r ,.,-.. w. . |
" b " ]• *^
Y \ u LI J II y i nm 1
p— — -
/I b K d« • • * II /K b ("
-•-
which might be interpreted as follows : —
Ex.9.
itn " "fr _r HfuV 1
V-U H -i | ^ HVMy I '
1 1
fl0« f 4
t% zzr^i — ^_ J— H^fc 3 ^ — »— „
—^HJ — F- n^—s — ' — — ' —
f/£^=its~ — P -d "^ :==l
U. 1- 1 1 U J
Some theorists hold that the passage of the
ninth to the third — as Db to E in Ex. 5 a (where
the root C does not appear) — is sufficient to con
stitute resolution. That such a form of resolu
tion is very common is obvious from theorists
having noticed it, but it ought to be understood
that the mere change of position of the notes of
a discord is not sufficient to constitute resolution
unless a real change of harmony is implied by
the elimination of the discordant note ; or unless
the change of position leads to fresh harmony,
and thereby satisfies the conditions of intelligible
connection with the discord.
A much more unusual and remarkable resolu
tion is such as appears at the end of the first
movement of Beethoven's F minor Quartet as
follows —
Ex 6
^ — "3 ifc" ~ s~~$*—
^ - — -cjf f
-n.- , — ferfl J c ,-J 1
-^~rr-^»
^ b »
i; 1 . . , m ..|
Another device which came early into use, anc
was in great favour with Bach and his sous anc
their contemporaries, and is yet an ever fruitfu
source of variety, is that of interpolating notes
in the part which has what is called the discor-
.dant note, between its sounding and its final
resolution, and either passing direct to the note
which relieves the dissonance from the digression,
or touching the dissonant note slightly again at
the end of it. The simplest form of this device
was the leap from a suspended note to another
note belonging to the same harmony, and then
back to the note which supplies the resolution,
as in Ex. 10 ; and this form was extremely com
mon in quite the early times of polyphonic music.
Ex. 10. . ^
1 } i h b j— — i n—
g£t_ J_, * ^-^^===:
•y b ijj ^ 1 y
: — k-Jr- ~f- —
r T^r J
where the chord of the Dominant seventh con
tracts into the mere single note which it repre
sents, and that proceeds to the note only of the
Kff;' i'ir i ^
But much more elaborate forms of a similar
nature were made use of later. An example
from J. S. Bach will be found at p. 678 of vol. i,
RESOLUTION.
of this Dictionary ; the following example, from
a Fantasia by Emanuel Bach, illustrates the same
point somewhat remarkably, and serves also as
an instance of enharmonic resolution.
Ex.11.
RESPONSE.
115
The minor seventh on C in this case is ulti
mately resolved as if it had been an augmented
sixth composed of the same identical notes accord
ing to our system of temperament, but derived
from a different source and having consequently
a different context. This manner of using the
same group of notes in different senses is one of
the most familiar devices in modern music for
varying the course of resolutions and obtaining
fresh aspects of harmonic combinations. [For
further examples see MODULATION, CHANGE, EN
HARMONIC.]
An inference which follows from the use of
some forms of Enharmonic resolution is that the
discordant note need not inevitably move to reso
lution, but may be brought into consonant rela
tions by the motion of other parts, which relieve
it of its characteristic dissonant effect ; this is
illustrated most familiarly by the freedom which
is recognised in the resolution of the chord of the
sixth, fifth and third on the subdominant, called
sometimes the added sixth, and sometimes an in
version of the supertonic seventh, and sometimes
an inversion of the eleventh of the Dominant, or
even a double -rooted chord derived from Tonic
and Dominant together.
It is necessary to note shortly the nse of
vicarious resolutions — that is, of resolutions in
which one part supplies the discordant note and
another the note to which under ordinary cir
cumstances it ought to pass. This has been
alluded to above as common in respect of the
so-called fundamental discords, but there are
instances of its occurring with less independent
combinations. The Gigue of Bach's Partita in
E minor is full of remarkable experiments in
resolution ; the following is an example which
illustrates especially the point under consider
ation.
— P- — 1 25* >-
The inference tobe drawn from the above examples
is that the possible resolutions of discords, espe
cially of those which have an individual status,
are varied, but that it takes time to discover
them, as there can hardly be a severer test of a
true musical instinct in relation to harmony
than to make sure of such a matter. As a rule,
the old easily recognisable resolutions, by motion
of a single degree, or at least by interchange of
parts of the chord in supplying the subsequent
consonant harmony, must preponderate, and the
more peculiar resolutions will be reserved for
occasions when greater force and intensity are
required. But as the paradoxes of one genera
tion are often the truisms of the next, so treat
ment of discords such as is utterly incredible to
people who do not believe in what they are not
accustomed to, is felt to be obvious to all when
it becomes familiar ; and hence the peculiarities
which are reserved for special occasions at first
must often in their turn yield the palm of specialin-
terest to more complex instinctive generalisations.
Such is the history of the development of musical
resources in the past, and such it must be in the
future. The laws of art require to be based
upon the broadest and most universal generalisa
tions; and in the detail under consideration it
appears at present that the ultimate test is
thorough intelligibility in the melodic progres
sions of the parts which constitute the chords, or
in a few cases the response of the harmony repre
senting one root to that representing another,
between which, as in Examples 3 and 4, there is
a recognised connection sufficient for the mind to
follow without the express connection of the flow
of the parts. Attempts to catalogue the various
discords and their various resolutions must be
futile as long as the injunction is added that such
formulas only are . admissible, for this is to insist
upon the repetition of what has been said before ;
but they are of value when they are considered
with sufficient generality to help us to arrive at
the ultimate principles which underlie the largest
circle of their multifarious varieties. The imaofin-
o
ationcan live and move freely within the bounds
of comprehensive laws, but it is only choked by
the accumulation of precedents. [C.H.H.P.]
PtESPONSE, in English church music, is, in
its widest sense, any musical sentence sung by
the choir at the close of something read or
chanted by the minister. The term tlius in
cludes the ' Amen' after prayers, the ' Kyrie3 after
each commandment in the Communion Service,
the ' Doxology ' to the Gospel, and every reply to
a Versicle, or to a Petition, or Suffrage. In its
more limited sense the first three of the above
divisions would be excluded from the term, and
12
116
RESPONSE.
the last-named would fall naturally into the
following important groups : (i) those which im
mediately precede the Psalms, called also the
Preces ; (2) those following the Apostles' Creed
and the Lord's Prayer ; (3) those following the
Lord's Prayer in the Litany ; (4) and the Re
sponses of the first portion of the Litany, which
however are of a special musical form which will be
fully explained hereafter. Versicles and Responses
are either an ancient formula of prayer or praise
as, ' Lord, have mercy upon us,' etc., ' Glory be
to the Father,' etc., or a quotation from Holy
Scripture, as,
V. O Lord, open Thou our lips.
R. And our mouth shall shew forth Thy praise.
which is verse 15 of Psalm li ; or a quotation from
a church hymn, as,
V. O Lord, save Thy people.
R. And bless Thine inheritance.
which is from the Te Deum ; or an adaptation of
a prayer to the special purpose, as,
V. Favourably with mercy hear our prayers.
R. O Son of David, have mercy upon us.
The musical treatment of such Versicles and
Responses offers a wide and interesting field of
study. There can be little doubt that all the
inflections or cadences to which they are set
have been the gradual development of an original
monotonal treatment, which in time was found
to be uninteresting and tedious (whence our
term of contempt 'monotonous'), or was designedly
varied for use on special occasions and during
holy seasons. At the time of the Reformation
the musical system of the Roman Church, with
its distinct and elaborate inflections for Orations,
Lections, Chapters, Gospels, Epistles, Antiphons,
Introits, etc., etc. [see the article on PLAIN -
SONG], was completely overthrown, and out of
the wreck only a few of the most simple cadences
were preserved. Even the response ' Alleluia '
was sometimes extended to a considerable length :
here is a specimen —
1L
Al - lo - - - lu
ia.
The word ' Alleluia ' is found as a Response in
the Prayer-book of 1549, for use between Easter
and Trinity, immediately before the Psalms ;
during the remainder of the year the translation
of the word was used. Here is Marbecke's
music for it (1550) : —
Prayse ye the Lorde
When this was in later editions converted into
a Versicle and Response, as in our present
Prayer-book, the music was, according to some
uses, divided between the Versicle and Response,
thus,
-r
" V, Praise ye the Lord. B. The Lord's name be praised.
But as a matter of fact these ' Preces ' in our
Prayer-book which precede the daily Psalms
RESPONSE.
have never been strictly bound by the laws of
* ecclesiastical chant,' hence, not only are great
varieties of plain-song settings to be met with,
gathered from Roman and other uses, but
also actual settings in service-form (that is,
like a motet), containing contrapuntal devices
in four or more parts. Nearly all the best
cathedral libraries contain old examples of this
elaborate treatment of the Preces, and several
have been printed by Dr. Jebb in his ' Choral
Responses.'
As then the Preces are somewhat exceptional,
we will pass to the more regular Versicles and
Responses, such as those after the Apostles'
Creed and the Lord's Prayer. And here we at
once meet the final 'fall of a minor third," which
is an ancient form of inflection known as the
Accentus Medialis : —
This is one of the most characteristic progres
sions in plain-song versicles, responses, con
fessions, etc., and was actually introduced by
Marbecke into the closing sentences of the Lord's
Prayer. It must have already struck the reader
that this is nothing more or less than the ' note '
of the cuckoo. This fact was probably in Shake-
spere's mind when he wrote,
The finch, the sparrow, and the lark,
The plain-song cuckoo gray.
This medial accent is only used in Versicles
and Responses when the last word is a poly
syllable ; thus —
Medial Accent.
R. And grant us Thy salva-tion
When the last word is a monosyllable, there
is an additional note, thus —
Moderate Accent.
B. As we do put our trust ia Thee.
This may be said to be the only law of the
Accentus Ecclesiaslicus which the tradition of our
Reformed Church enforces. It is strictly observed
in most of our cathedrals, and considering its
remarkable simplicity, should never be broken.
The word ' prayers ' was formerly pronounced as
a dissyllable ; it therefore took the medial accent
thus —
Favourably with mercy hear our pray-ers.
but as a monosyllable it should of course be
treated thus —
Favourably with mercy hear our prayers.
In comparing our Versicles and Responses with
the Latin from which they were translated, it is
important to bear this rule as to the ' final word'
in mind. Because, the Latin and English of the
BESPONSE.
RESPONSE.
117
same Versicle or Response will frequently take
different 'accents' in the two languages. For
example, the following Versicle takes in the
Latin the medial accent ; but in the translation
will require the moderate accent.
Latin form.
-fr*
Ab inimicis nostris defende nos Chris - te.
English form.
From our enemies defend us. O Christ.
It has been just stated that the early part of
the Litany does not come under the above laws
of ' accent.' The principle melodic progression
is however closely allied to the above, it having
merely an additional note, thus —
~^r-
3
This is the old and common Response
O - ra pro no-bis
and to this are adapted the Responses, ' Spare us,
good Lord ' ; 'Good Lord, deliver us '; ' We beseech
Thee to hear us, good Lord ' ; 'Grant us Thy peace ' ;
'Have mercy upon us'; 'O Christ hear us' (the
first note being omitted as redundant) ; and ' Lord
have mercy upon us ; Christ have mercy upon us.'
At this point, the entry of the Lord's Prayer
brings in the old law of medial and moderate
accents; the above simple melody therefore is
the true Response for the whole of the first (and
principal) portion of the Litany. It is necessary
however to return now to the preliminary sen
tences of the Litany, or the ' Invocations,' as they
have been called. Here we find each divided by
a colon, and, in consequence, the simple melody
last given is lengthened by one note, thus :
£3_
3E
This is used without variation for all the Invo
cations. The asterisk shows the added note,
which is set to the syllable immediately pre
ceding the colon. It happens that each of the
sentences of Invocation contains in our English
version a monosyllable before the colon ; but it
is not the case in the Latin, therefore both Ver-
fiicle and Response differ from our use, thus —
Pater de ccBlis De - us
In the petitions of the Litany, the note marked
with an asterisk is approached by another addition,
for instead of
we hav
•$$=~
J—
W--&
•-r^~
-5!-^-
with us for ever.
The whole sentence of music therefore stands
thus —
(Petition chanted by
Priest.)
(Response by Choir and
People.)
We have now shortly traced the gradual growth
of the plain-song of the whole of our Litany, and
it is impossible not to admire the simplicity and
beauty of its construction.
But the early English church-musicians fre
quently composed original musical settings of
the whole Litany, a considerable number of
which have been printed by Dr. Jebb ; nearly
all however are now obsolete except that by
Thomas Wanless (organist of York Minster at
the close of the iyth century), which is occa
sionally to be heard in our northern cathedrals.
The plain-song was not always entirely ignored
by church-musicians, but it was sometimes in
cluded in the tenor part in such a mutilated
state as to be hardly recognisable. It is gene
rally admitted that the form in which Tallis'
responses have come down to us is very impure,
if not incorrect. To such an extent LS this the
case that in an edition of the ' people's part ' of
Tallis, published not many years since, the editor
(a cathedral organist) fairly gave up the task of
finding the plain-song of the response, ' We be
seech Thee to hear us, good Lord,' and ordered
the people to sing the tuneful superstructure —
*> We be - seech Thee to bear us, good Lord.
It certainly does appear impossible to combine
this with
^^
"We beseech Thee to hear us, good Lord.
But it appears that this ancient form existed-
Chris - te ex - au - di nos.
This, if used by Tallis, will combine with his
harmonies; thus —
£
/h J ^ 3 — «
n — •—
-3 1
— >. — ,) — „ — <9 — a —
?£ & & -
—tst j ri &-4
V\) 5= •
^" T r~? r r
W« be - seech Thee to
-) J J ^_J -!
-^ * . — &—u —
~^&-
hear us, good Lord.
| | _l „ „
( 0 God the 1 . ( have mercy upon 1
1 Father, of } »»»«« : I us, miser- j a'ble slnners-
Latin.
^. — f^-^—^ — f* —
I K_
1 •-
— T^ 1 — 1 — f^'
s • • •
i 1 — 1 —
(Plain-sone in Tenor
* l
L. . -
Having now described the Preces, Yersicles
and Responses, and Litany, it only remains to
say a few words on (i) Amens, (2) Doxology to
Gospel, (3) Responses to the Commandments,
113
RESPONSE.
all of which we have mentioned as being responses
of a less important kind, (i) Since the Reforma
tion but two forms of Amen have been used in our
church, the monotone, and the approach by a
semitone, generally harmonised thus —
rf
a..
A - men.
.-_£
-
A - men.
is 1
-^— ^ \ :
The former of these 'Amens ' in early times was
used when the choir responded to the priest ; the
latter, when both priest and choir sang together
(as after the Confession, Lord's Prayer, Creed,
etc.). Tallis, however, always uses the mono-
tonic form, varying the harmonies thrice. In
more modern uses, however, the ancient system
has been actually reversed, and (as at St. Paul's
Cathedral) the former is only used when priest
and choir join ; the latter when the choir re
sponds. In many cathedrals no guiding prin
ciple is adopted ; this is undesirable.
(2) The Doxology to the Gospel is always mono
tone, the monotone being in the Tenor, thus —
{?!1<aayks}betoThee'OLord-
There are, however, almost innumerable original
settings of these words used throughout the
country.
(3) The Responses to the Commandments are
an expansion of the ancient —
Kyrie eleisqn,
Christe eleison,
Kyrie eleison,
made to serve as ten responses instead of being
used as one responsive prayer. The ancient
form actually appears in Marbecke (1550), and
the so-callod Marbecke's ' Kyrie ' now used is an
editorial manipulation. Being thrown on their
own resources for the music to these ten re
sponses, our composers of the reformed church
always composed original settings, sometimes
containing complete contrapuntal devices. At
one period of vicious taste, arrangements of
various sentences of music, sacred or secular,
were pressed into the service. The 'Jomelli
Kyrie ' is a good — or rather, a bad — example. It
is said to have been adapted by Attwood from a
chaconne by Jomelli, which had already been
much used on the stage as a soft and slow
accompaniment of weird and ghostly scenes. The
adaptation of ' Open the heavens ' from ' Elijah'
is still very popular, and may be considered a
favourable specimen of an unfavourable class.
The re-introduction of choral celebrations of
Holy Communion has necessitated the use of
various inflections, versicles, and responses, of
which the music or method of chanting has,
almost without exception, been obtained from
pre-Reformation sources. [ J. S.]
REST.
RESPONSORIUM. A species of Antiphon,
sung in many parts of the Roman Office,
and particularly after each of the nine Lessons at
Matins, in which Service it forms a very im
portant feature, more especially during Holy
Week, when the Lessons are taken from the
Lamentations of Jeremiah, and the Responsoria
are so arranged as to explain their connection
with the sad History of the Passion. [See
LAMENTATIONS.]
The number of Responsoria used throughout
the Ecclesiastical Year is very great. The
Plain Chaunt Melodies adapted to them will be
found in the Antiphonarium, the Directorium
Chori, the Officium Hebdomadae Sanctse, and
other similar Office Books. They have also been
frequently treated in the Polyphonic Style, with
very great effect, not only by the Great Masters
of the 1 6th century, but even as late as the time
of Colonna, whose Responsoria of the Office for
the Dead, for 8 Voices, are written with intense
appreciation of the solemn import of the text.
A large collection of very fine examples — in
cluding an exquisitely beautiful set for Holy
Week, by Vittoria — will be found in vol. iv. of
Proske's < Musica Divina.' [W.S.E.]
REST (Fr. Silence, Pause ; Ger. Pause ; Ital.
Pausa']. The sign of silence in music, the dura
tion of the silence depending upon the form of
the character employed to denote it. The employ
ment of the rest dates from the invention of
'measured music,' that is, music composed of
notes of definite and proportionate values. [See
MUSICA MENSURATA; NOTATION, p. 470.] In
earlier times the cantus was sung without pauses,
or with only such slight breaks as were necessary
for the due separation of the sentences of the
text, but so soon as the relative duration of the
notes was established, the employment of rests of
like proportionate values became a necessity.
Franchinus Gafurius, in his ' Practica Musics; '
(1496), says that the Rest 'was invented to give
a necessary relief to the voice, and a sweetness
to the melody ; for as a preacher of the divine
word, or an orator in his discourse, finds it neces
sary oftentimes to relieve his auditors by the
recital of some pleasantry, thereby to make them
more favourable and attentive, so a singer, inter
mixing certain pauses with his notes, engages
the attention of his hearers to the remaining
parts of his song.' (Hawkins, * Hist, of Music,'
chap. 63.) Accordingly we find rests correspond
ing in value to each of the notes then in use, as
shown in the following table.
Maxima
Longa.
3
= — i
Brevls.
H
— i —
SemfbrevlJ.
0
a '
— i —
i i
Maxima. Longa perlecta. Longa imperfecta. Pausa. Semipausa.
Minima.
Semiminima.
Fusa.
Semifusa.
t
|= =F~-
1
K
L
\
1
Suspirium.
Semisuspirlum.
Pausa Fusee.
Fausa Semifusa.
REST.
Of these rests, two, the semipausa and suspi-
rium, have remained in use until the present
day, and appear, slightly increased in size but of
unchanged value, as the semibreve and minim
rests. Two of the longer rests are also occasion
ally used in modern music, the pausa, or breve
rest, to express a silence of two bars' duration,
and the longa imperfecta a silence of four. These
rests are called in French batons, and are spoken
of as ' baton a deux mesures,' ' a quatre mesures.'
The rests employed in modern music, with
their names and values in corresponding notes,
are shown in the table below.1
By a license the semibreve rest is used to ex
press a silence of a full bar in any rhythm (hence
the German name Taktpause) ; its value is
therefore not invariable, as is the case with all
the other rests, for it may be shorter than its
corresponding note, as when used to express a
bar of 2-4 or 6-8 time, or longer, as when it occurs
(o) (»> 00 00
RESULTANT TONES.
119
in 3-2 time. To express a rest of longer duration
than one bar, either the bdtons of two or four
bars are employed (Ex. a), or, more commonly,
a thick horizontal line is drawn in the stave, and
the number of bars which have to be counted in
silence is written above it (Ex. &).
00 (&) 10 '
I
Like the notes, the value of a rest can be in
creased by the addition of a dot, and to the same
extent, thus -»- • is equal to ---[-, [• ' to j- *i , and
so on.
In the earlier forms of the ancient ' measured
music ' rests were used as a part of the time-
signature, and placed immediately after the clef.
In this position they did not denote silence,
but merely indicated the description of Mode
to be counted. [See NOTATION, MODE, TIME-
SIGNATURE.]
(/)
to)
£5
r
r
c n
i*
1 i j
g
ENGLISH.
(a) Semibreve rest.
(I) Minim rest.
(c) Crotchet rest.
(d) Quaver rest.
(e) Semiquaver rest.
(/) Demisemiquaver rest.
(g) Semidemisemiquaver rest.
FRENCH.
(a) Pause.
(6) Demi-pause.
(c) Soupir.
(d) Demi-soupir.
(e) Quart-de-soupir.
(/) Demi-quart-de-soupir.
(g) Seizieme-de-soupir.
GERMAN.
(a) Taktpause.
(6) Halbe Pause.
(c) Viertelpause.
(d) Achtelpause.
(e) Sechszentelpause.
(/) Zweiunddreissigstheilpause.
(g) Vierundsechszigstheilpause.
ITALIAN.
(a) Pausa della Semibreve.
(6) Pausa della Minima.
(c) Pausa della Semiminima, or Quarto.
(d) Pausa della Croma, or Mezzo Quarto.
(e) Pausa della Semicroma, or Respiro.
(/) Pausa della Biscroma.
(gr) Pausa della Semibiscroma. [FT]
RESULTANT TONES (Fr. Sons rdsultans ;
Ger. Combinationstone) are produced when any
two loud and sustained musical sounds are heard
at the same time. There are two kinds of re
sultant tones, the Differential and the Summa-
tional. The ' Differential tone ' is so called be
cause its number of vibrations is equal to the
difference between those of the generating sounds.
The 'Summational tone' is so called because its
number of vibrations is equal to the sum of those
of the generating sounds. The following dia
gram shows the pitches of the differential tones
of the principal consonant intervals when in per
fect tune.
Generators.
-10— r-v*^ v — u
T
1
1 II
,^ '/b
S>- 5
^
- 9 -&- 4
•V J'1'1
U -4
^/»
/•
h— fl
Differentials.
If the interval be wider than an octave, as in
the last two examples, the differential is inter
mediate between the sounds which produce it.
These tones can be easily heard on the ordinary
harmonium, and also on the organ. They are
not so distinct on the piano, because the sounds
of this instrument are not sustained. By prac-
"• The German form of the crotchet rest differs from the English,
being usually written thus j'. Rousseau also gives Italian forms of
the semiquaver and demisemiquaver rests, thus f and T; these
ar« however not common.
tice, however, the resultant tones can be dis
tinguished on the piano also.
Dissonant as well as consonant intervals pro
duce resultant tones. Taking the minor Seventh
in its three possible forms the differentials are as
follows : —
The ist form of minor Seventh is obtained by
tuning two Fifths upwards (C-G-D) and then a
major Third downwards (D-/Bb) : its differential
tone is /Ab, an exact major Third below C. The
2nd form is gob by two exact Fourths upwards
(C-F-Bb) : the differential is then \Ab, which
is flatter than the previous /Ab by the interval
35 : 36. The 3rd form is the so-called Harmonic
Seventh on C, whose differential is G, an exact
Fourth below C. The marks \, /, here used to
distinguish notes which are confused in the or
dinary notation, will be found explained under
TEMPERAMENT.
Hitherto we have spoken only of the differen
tial tones which are produced by the funda
mentals or prime partial tones of musical sounds.
[See PARTIAL TONES.] But a differential may
also arise from the combination of any upper
partial of one sound with any partial of the other
sound ; or from the combination of a differential
with a partial, or with another differential.
120
RESULTANT TONES.
Thus the major Third C-E
ing differential tones : —
may have the follow-
y u
f[ J II
V \s .*• — ! U
*
.
All these tones are heard simultaneously ; but
for convenience the differentials of the ist, and,
3rd, and 4th orders are written with notes of
different length. We see, then, that the number
of possible resultant tones is very great ; but only
those which arise from the primes of musical
sounds are sufficiently strong to be of practical
importance.
In enabling the ear to distinguish between
consonant and dissonant intervals, the differential
tones are only less important than the upper
partials. Thus if the chord G-E-C be accurately
tuned as 3:5:8, the differential of G-C coin
cides with E, and that of E-C with G. But if
the intervals be tempered the differentials are
thrown out of tune, and give rise to beats.
These beats are very loud and harsh on the or
dinary harmonium, tuned in equal temperament.
Again, in the close triad C-E-G- the differentials
of C-E and of E-G coincide and give no beats if
the intervals be in perfect tune. On a tempered
instrument the result is very different. If we
take C to have 264 vibrations, the tempered E
has about 332|, and the tempered G about 39 5 1
vibrations. The differential of C-E is then 68|,
and that of E-G 63. These two tones beat 5±
times each second, and thus render the chord to
some extent dissonant.
In the minor triad, even when in just intona
tion, several of the resultant tones do not fit in
with the notes of the chord, although they may
be too far apart to beat. In the major triad, on
the contrary, the resultant tones form octaves
with the notes of the chord. To this difference
Helmholtz attributes the less perfect consonance
of the minor triad, and its obscured though not
inharmonious effect.
The origin of the differential tones has been
the subject of much discussion. Thomas Young
held that when beats became too rapid to be
distinguished by the ear, they passed into the re
sultant tone. This view prevailed until the pub
lication in 1856 of Helmholtz's investigations,
in which many objections to Young's theory were
brought forward. To explain what these ob
jections are, it would be necessary to treat at
some length of the nature of beats, and the reader
is therefore referred to the Appendix, Article
BEATS, for this side of the question. The new
BESULTANT TONES.
mathematical theory given by Helmholtz is too
abstruse to admit of popular exposition.
It was also part of Young's theory that the
differential tone was produced in the ear alone,
and not in the external air. But Helmholtz
found that stretched membranes and resonators
responded very clearly to differentials produced
by the siren or the harmonium. This he con
siders to prove the existence of vibrations in the
external air corresponding to the differential
tones. But when the two generating tones were
produced by separate instruments, the differential,
though powerfully audible, hardly set the reso
nator in vibration at all. Hence Helmholtz con
cludes that the differential tone is for the most
part gen erated in the ear itself. He further points
out that certain features in the construction of
the ear easily permit the action of the law which
he has stated. The unsymmetrical form of the
drum-skin of the ear, and the loose attachment
of the ossicles are, he thinks, peculiarly favour
able to the production of resultant tones.
As a consequence of his theory, Helmholtz de
duced a different series of resultant tones, which
he calls summational tones, because their number
of vibrations is the sum of those of the generators.
The existence of the summational tones which
Helmholtz believes he has verified experimentally,
has recently been called in question by Dr.
Preyer. He points out that in some intervals, as
for instance, 1:2, 1:3, 1:5, there will be a
partial tone present of the same pitch as the
presumed summational tone, and these cases
therefore prove nothing. Again, if we take 2 : 3,
the note 5 is not necessarily a summational tone,
but may be the differential of 4 and 9 which are
the 2nd partial of 2 and the 3rd of 3 respectively.
Dr. Preyer was unable to find any trace of the
summational tones when care had been taken to
exclude the upper partials. But to do this he
could only use sounds of tuning-forks gently
bowed, which were far too weak to produce any
resultant tones in the air. The question, how
ever, is one of theoretic interest merely.
Not only the origin, but also the discovery of
differential tones has been disputed. The earliest
publication of the discovery was made by a
German organist named Sorge in 1745. Then
came Romieu, a French savant, in 1751. Lastly,
the great Italian violinist Tartini made the
phenomenon the basis of his Treatise on Harmony
in 1754. But Tartini explicitly claims priority
in these words : — 'In the year 1714, when about
twenty-two years of age, he discovered this phe
nomenon by chance on the violin at Ancona,
where many witnesses who remember the fact
are still living. He communicated it at once,
without reserve, to professors of the violin. He
made it the fundamental rule of perfect tuning
for the pupils in his school at Padua, which was
commenced in 1728 and which still exists; and
thus the phenomenon became known throughout
Europe.'1
Tartini in some cases mistook the pitch of the
differential tone ; but there does not appear to
i De Principii dell' Annonia, Padova, 1767. p. 36.
RESULTANT TONES.
be any reason for taking from him the credit of
the discovery which has so long been associated
with his name. [J. L.]
RETARDATION is a word used by some
theorists to distinguish a small group of discords
which are similar in nature to suspensions, but
resolve upwards, as in Ex. i.
Ex. 1. Ex. 2.
^
J J—ft-^rF3
S35 £=— -*ZZ^- ^^2
The ground for making this sub-class is that
it appears inaccurate to describe as suspensions
notes which are delayed or retarded in ascending.
A comparison of Ex. 2, which would be distin
guished as a suspension, with Ex. I will show
the identity of principle which underlies the two
discords ; while the fact of their ascending or
descending is clearly not an attribute but an
accident. So in this case there is no other
ostensible reason for breaking up a well-defined
class but the fact that the common designation in
use is supposed, perhaps erroneously, to be insuffi
cient to denote all that ought to come under it. On
the other hand it requires to be noted that as all
discords of this class are discords of retardation,
and as those which rise are very much less com
mon than those which descend in resolution, the
name which might describe the whole class is
reserved for the smallest and least conspicuous
group in that class. [C.H.H.P.]
REUTTER, GEORG, born 1656 at Vienna,
became in 1686 organist of St. Stephen's, and in
1 700 Hof- and Kammer-organist. He also played
the theorbo in the Hof-Kapelle from 1697 to
1703. In 1712 he succeeded Fux as Capell-
meister to the Gnadenbild in St. Stephen's, and
in 1715 became Capellmeister of the cathedral
itself. He died Aug. 29, 1738. His church
music was sound, without being remarkable. In
Jan. 1695 he was knighted in Rome by Count
Francesco Sforza, on whose family Pope Paul III.
bestowed the privilege of conferring that honour
in 1539. The name of Reutter is closely con
nected with that of Haydn, through his son,
GEORG KARL (generally known by his first
name only), who, according to the cathedral
register, was born in Vienna April 6, 1 708, be
came Court-composer in I73I> and succeeded his
father in 1738 as Capellmeister of the cathedral.
In 1746 he was appointed second Court-capell-
meister, his duty being to conduct the music of
the Emperor's church, chamber, and dinner- table.
On Predieri's retirement in 1^51 Reutter exer
cised the functions of chief Court-capellmeister,
but did not receive the title till the death of the
former in 1769. As an economical measure he
was allowed the sum of 20,000 gulden (£2,000)
to maintain the court-capelle (the whole body of
musicians, vocal and instrumental), and he enjoys
the melancholy distinction of having reduced the
establishment to the lowest possible ebb. Reutter
REVUE ET GAZETTE MUSICALE. 121
composed for the court numerous operas, cantatas
d 'occasion, and Italian oratorios for Lent ; also a
requiem, and smaller dramatic and sacred works.
His grand masses are showy, with rapid and
noisy instrumentation, so much so that ' rushing
(rauschende) violins d. la Reutter ' became a
proverb. Burney heard one of them during his
visit to Vienna in 1772, and says 'it was dull,
dry, stuff; great noise and little meaning cha
racterised the whole performance.' (Present
State of Music in Germany, i. 36I.)1 In 1731
Reutter married Theresia Holzhauser, a court
singer of merit, who died in 1782. His own
death took place March 12, 1772. He was much
favoured at court owing to his great tact ; and
Maria Theresa ennobled him in 1 740 as ' Edler
von Reutter.' As stated above, his name is in
separably associated with that of Haydn, whom
he heard sing as a boy in the little town of
Hainburg, and engaged for the choir of St.
Stephen's, where he sang from 1740 to 1748.
His treatment of the poor chorister, and his
heartless behaviour when the boy's fine voice
had broken, are mentioned under HAYDN, vol. i.
703- [C.F.P.]
REVEILLE. See SIGNALS.
REVERSE. See ROVESCIO.
REVUE ET GAZETTE MUSICALE, the
oldest and most complete of French musical pe
riodicals. This branch of literature has taken
root in France with great difficulty. So far back
as Jan. 1770, M. de Breuilly and other amateurs
founded the 'Journal de Musique' (monthly, Svo),
which after a troubled existence of three years was
dropped till 1777, and then resumed for one year
more. In 1810 Fayolle started 'Les Tablettes
de Polymnie ' (Svo), but it did not survive beyond
1 8 1 1 . Undeterred by these failures, Fe"tis brought
out the first number of the ' Revue musicale ' in
January 1827. It appeared four times a month,
each number containing 24 pages 8vo., till Feb. 5,
1831, when it was published weekly, in small 4to,
double columns. ' La Gazette musicale de Paris,'
started Jan. 5, 1834, was similar in size to Fe'tis's
' Revue,' and also weekly, but issued on Sunday
instead of Saturday. The two were united on
Nov. i, 1835, since which date the 'Revue et
Gazette musicale,' has twice enlarged its form,
in 1841 and in 1845, a^ which date it became
what it was till its last number, Dec. 31, 1880.
The property of the publishers Schlesinger and
Brandus, this periodical has always been noted
for the reputation and ability of its editors.
Amongst its regular contributors have been :
Anders, C. Bannelier, C. Beauquier, Berlioz,
P. Bernard, H. Blanchard, A. Botte, M. Bourges,
Chouquet, Comettant, Cristal, Danjou, Ernest
David, F. J. Fetis, 0. Fouque, Heller, He"quet,
A. Jullien, Kastner, Lacome, A. de La Fage,
Lavoix fils, Liszt, de Monter, d Ortigues, Pougin,
Monnais (' Paul Smith '), Richard Wagner, and
Johannes Weber. A careful reader of the 47
volumes will easily recognise the sentiments
i It is Burney who is responsible for the absurd dleeresis with which
this name is usually spelt in England— Beiitter.
122 REVUE ET GAZETTE MUSICALE.
of the various editors through whose hands it
passed ; among those deserving special mention
are Fe"tis, Edouard Monnais, and M. Charles
Bannelier, who conducted it from 1872 with equal
learning and taste. The indexes given with each
volume are a great boon, and constitute one of
its advantages over other French periodicals of the
same kind.
The cessation of this excellent periodical is an
event which all lovers and students of music will
deeply regret. We trust that the hope of a pos
sible revival, held out by the publishers in their
farewell address, may be speedily fulfilled. [G-.C.]
REYER, ERNEST, whose real name is Rey,
was born at Marseilles, Dec. I, 1823. As a child
he learned solfeggio at the free school of music
founded byBarsotti (born in Florence 1786, died
at Marseilles 1868), and became a good reader,
though he did not carry his musical education far.
At 1 6 he went to Algiers as a government official,
but continued his pianoforte practice, and began
to compose without having properly learned
harmony and counterpoint. He was soon able
to write romances which became popular, and
composed a mass which was solemnly performed
before the Duke and Duchess d'Aumale. Had
he remained in Algiers he would probably never
have been anything beyond a mere amateur, but
the Revolution of 1848 depriving him of the
support of the Governor-General, he returned to
Paris, and placed himself in the hands of his
aunt Mme. Louise Farrenc, who completed his
musical education, and before long he found an
opportunity of coming before the public. From
his friend Theophile Gautier he procured the
libretto of 'Le Selam,' an oriental 'Symphony' in
4 parts, on the model of David's ' Le Ddserfc.' It
was produced with success April 5, 1850, and then
Me"ry furnished him with 'Maitre Wolfram,'
a i -act opera, which was also successful, at the
Theatre Lyrique, May 20, 1854. His next work
was 'Sacountala' (July 20, 1858), one of the
charming ballets of The'ophile Gautier ; but his
full strength was first put forth in ' La Statue,'
a 3-act opera produced at the Theatre Lyrique,
April ii, 1 86 1, and containing music which is
both melodious and full of colour. ' Erostrate '
(2 acts) was performed at Baden in 1862, and
reproduced at the Academic, Oct. 1 6, 1871, for
two nights only. The revival of ' La Statue ' at
the Opera in 1878 was also a failure, and M.
Reyer may find it difficult to secure the per
formance of 'Sigurd,' of which the overture and
some of the more important numbers have been
heard. To complete the list of his compositions
we may mention ' Victoire,' a cantata (the Opera,
June 27, 1859) ; a 'Recueil de 10 Melodies' for
voice and PF. ; songs for a single voice; and some
pieces of sacred music.
Besides being reckoned among the most poetical
of French musicians, M. Reyer is an accom
plished feuilletoniste. After writing successively
for the ' Presse,' the ' Revue de Paris,' and the
' Courrier de Paris,' he became musical critic to
the 'Journal des De"bats' after the death of
Berlioz. His articles are not only pleasant reading,
RHYTHM.
but evince both intellect and culture. He is
librarian to the Ope*ra, and succeeded his first
model, David, at the Institufc in 1876. [G.C.]
REYNOLDS, JOHN, gentleman of the Chapel
Royal from 1765 to 1770, was composer of the
pleasing anthem, ' My God, my God, look upon
me,' printed in Page's ' Harmonia Sacra,' Hul-
lah's Part Music, vol. ii. and elsewhere. Nothing
more of his is known. [W.H.H.]
RHEINBERGER, JOSEPH, born March 17,
1859, a* Vaduz, the capital of the principality
of Liechtenstein. He was so precocious that he
began to learn the pianoforte at the age of five;
at seven years old he was organist at the church
of his native place, where, as his legs were too
short to reach down to the pedals, a second set
of pedals was fixed above the ordinary ones;
and very shortly afterwards he composed a mass
in three parts with organ accompaniment. His
first teacher was Herr Pohly, who still resides
and teaches in the Tyrol. At the age of twelve
Rheinberger was sent to the Munich Conserva-
torium, where he studied until he was nineteen,
under Herzog, Leonhard, and J. J. Maier ; he was
then appointed pianoforte teacher in the same
institution, and, about the same time, became
organist in the Hofkirche of St. Michael, and
subsequently Director of the Munich Oratorien-
verein. He is at present professor of counterpoint
and of the higher school of organ-playing in the
Royal School of Music, and conductor of the
court band (not of the opera) at Munich. Up
to the present time he has published 116 com
positions, among which are — 2 symphonies, ' Wai-
lenstein ' and 'Florentinische Sinfonie '; 2 operas,
' Die sieben Raben ' and ' Thti rmer's Tochter-
lein ' ; incidental music to a drama of Calderon's,
and to one of Raimond's ; several overtures,
' The Taming of the Shrew,' ' Demetrius,' etc. ;
many pianoforte works ; a concerto for piano and
orchestra ; much chamber music and church
music (among the latter a Grand Requiem for
those who fell in the war of 1870-71), a Stabat
Mater and a Mass in 8 parts (dedicated to Pope
Leo XIII.) ; 5 organ sonatas, and various works
for chorus and for male voices. Many of his pupils
have attained eminence in their profession. His
Quartet in Eb (op. 38) for PF. and strings
is a favourite work at the Monday Popular
Concerts, and has been performed there almost
annually since 1874. -^ Sonata for PF. and
violin in the same key (op. 77) has also been
played there. [J.A.F.M.]
RHEINGOLD, DAS. The Vorspiel, or Pre
lude, of the Tetralogie of Wagner's ' Niebelungen
Ring' — Rheingold, Walkure, Siegfried, and
Gotterdammerung. It was first performed at
Munich, Sept. 22, 1869, under the baton of
Herr Franz WtiUner. [G.]
RHINE FESTIVALS. See NIEDEBRHEIN-
ISCHE MUSIKFESTE, vol. ii. p. 455.
RHYTHM. This much-used and many-
sided term may be defined as ' the systematic
grouping of notes with regard to duration.' It
is often inaccurately employed as a synonym for
BHYTHM.
its two sub-divisions, ACCENT and TIME, and
in its proper signification bears the same relation
to these that metre bears to quantity in poetry.
The confusion which has arisen in the em
ployment of these terms is unfortunate, though
so frequent that it would appear to be natural,
and therefore almost inevitable. Take a number
of notes of equal length, and give an emphasis to
every second, third, or fourth, the music will
be said to be in ' rhythm' of two, three, or four-
meaning in time. Now take a number of these
groups or bars and emphasize them in the same
way as their sub-divisions : the same term will
still be employed, and rightly so. Again, instead
of notes of equal length, let each group consist
of unequal notes, but similarly arranged, as in the
following example from Schumann —
or in the Vivace of Beethoven's No. 7 Symphony:
the form of these groups also is spoken of as the
' prevailing rhythm,' though here accent is the
only correct expression.
Thus we see that the proper distinction of the
three terms is as follows : —
Accent arranges a heterogeneous mass of notes
into long and short ;
Time divides them into groups of equal dura
tion ;
Rhythm does for these groups what Accent does
for notes.
In short, Rhythm is the Metre of Music.
This parallel will help us to understand why
the uneducated can only write and fully compre
hend music in complete sections of four and
eight bars.
Rhythm, considered as the orderly arrange
ment of groups of accents — whether bars or parts
of bars — naturally came into existence only after
the invention of time and the bar-line. Barbarous
music, though more attentive to accent than
melody, plain-chant and the polyphonic church
music of the i6th century, fugues and most
music in polyphonic and fugal style, all these
present no trace of rhythm as above defined.
In barbarous music and plain-chant this is be
cause the notes exist only with reference to the
words, which are chiefly metre-less : in poly
phonic music it is because the termination of
one musical phrase (foot, or group of accents)
is always coincident with and hidden by the
commencement of another. And this although
the subject may consist of several phrases and
be quite rhythmical in itself, as is the case in
Bach's Organ Fugues in G minor and A minor.
The Ehythmus of the ancients was simply the
accent prescribed by the long and short syllables
of the poetry, or words to which the music was
set, and had no other variety than that afforded
by their metrical laws. Modern music, on the
other hand, would be meaningless and chaotic —
a melody would cease to be a melody — could we
not. plainly perceive a proportion, in the length
of the phrases.
RHYTHM.
123
The bar-line is the most obvious, but by no
means a perfect, means of distinguishing and
determining the rhythm ; but up to the time of
Mozart and Haydn the system of barring was
but imperfectly understood. Many even of
Handel's slow movements have only half their
proper number of bar-lines, and consequently
terminate in the middle of a bar instead of at
the commencement ; as for instance, ' He shall
?eed His flock' (which is really in 6-8 time), and
'Surely He hath borne our griefs' (which should
be 4-8 instead of £). Where the accent of a
piece is strictly Unary throughout, composers,
3ven to this day, appear to be often in doubt about
the rhythm, time, and barring of their music.
The simple and unmistakable rule for the latter
is this : the last strong accent will occur on the
first of a bar, and you have only to reckon back
wards. If the piece falls naturally into groups
of four accents it is four in a bar, but if there is
an odd two anywhere it should all be barred as
two in a bar. Ignorance or inattention to this
causes us now and then to come upon a sudden
change from (3 to 2-4 in modern music.
With regard to the regular sequence of bars
with reference to close and cadence — which is
the true sense of rhythm — much depends upon
the character of the music. The dance-music of
modern society must necessarily be in regular
periods of 4, 8, or 16 bars. Waltzes, though
written in 3-4 time, are almost always really in
6-8, and a dance -music writer will sometimes,
from ignorance, omit an unaccented bar (really
a half-bar), to the destruction of the rhythm.
The dancers, marking the time with their feet,
and feeling the rhythm in the movement of their
bodies, then complain, without understanding
what is wrong, that such a waltz is ' not good
to dance to.'
In pure music it is different. Great as are
the varieties afforded by the diverse positions
and combinations of strong and weak accents, the
equal length of bars, and consequently of musical
phrases, would cause monotony were it not that
we are allowed to combine sets of two, three,
and four bars. Not so freely as we may combine
the different forms of accent, for the longer divi
sions are less clearly perceptible ; indeed the
modern complexity of rhythm, especially in Ger
man music, is one of the chief obstacles to its
ready appreciation. Every one, as we have
already said, can understand a song or piece
where a half-close occurs at each fourth and a
whole close at each eighth bar, where it is ex
pected ; but when an uneducated ear is con
tinually being disappointed and surprised by
unexpected prolongations and alterations of
rhythm, it soon grows confused and unable to
follow the sense of the music. Quick music
naturally allows — indeed demands — more variety
of rhythm than slow, and we can scarcely turn
, to any Scherzo or Finale of the great composers
', where such varieties are not made use of. Taking
two-bar rhythm as the normal and simplest form
— just as two notes form the simplest kind of
, accent — the first variety we have to notice is
124
RHYTHM.
where one odd bar is thrust in to break the con
tinuity, as thus in the Andante of Beethoven's C
minor Symphony :
$&
*£3i
-JJ ::r-.
ft=t
this may also be effected by causing a fresh
phrase to begin with a strong accent on the
weak bar with which the previous subject ended,
thus really eliding a bar, as for instance in the
minuet in Haydn's ' Reine de France ' Symphony :
(a)
r
Here the bar marked (a) is the overlapping of
two rhythmic periods.
Combinations of two-bar rhythm are the
rhythms of four and six bars. The first of these
requires no comment, being the most common of
existing forms. Beethoven has specially marked
in two cases (Scherzo of 9th Symphony, and
Scherzo of CjJ minor Quartet) ' Ritmo de 4 bat-
tute,' because, these compositions being in such
short bars, the rhythm is not readily perceptible.
The six-bar rhythm is a most useful combination,
as it may consist of four bars followed by two,
two by four, three and three, or two, two and two.
The well-known minuet by Lulli (from ' Le Bour
geois Gentilhomme') is in the first of these com
binations throughout.
1st lime. 2nd time.
ffi
^E
And the opening of the Andante of Bee
thoven's ist Symphony is another good example.
Haydn is especially fond of this rhythm, es
pecially in the two first-named forms. Of the
rhythm of thrice two bars a good specimen is
afforded by the Scherzo of Schubert's C major
Symphony, where, after the two subjects (both
in four-bar rhythm) have been announced, the
strings in unison mount and descend the scale
in accompaniment to a portion of the first theme,
thus :
7T
— r- ±
-{?—*$-
\ r
tr
=§=
r+t*=E =B^
A still better example is the first section of
' God save the Queen.'
This brings us to triple rhythm, uncombined
with double.
RHYTHM.
Three -bar rhythm, if in a slow time, conveys
a very uncomfortable lop-sided sensation to the
uncultivated ear. The writer remembers an in
stance when the band could hardly be brought
to play a section of an Andante in 9-8 time and
rhythm of three bars. The combination of 3 x 3 x 3
was one which, their sense of accent refused to
acknowledge. Beethoven has taken the trouble
in the Scherzo of his 9th Symphony to mark
' Ritmo di tre battute,' although in such quick
time it is hardly necessary ; the passage,
fl
f
. ^^ 1*
JL
f
I/
• m
1
i
1
h
BH
-L-
being understood as though written —
Numerous instances of triple rhythm occur,
which he has not troubled to mark ; as hi the
Trio of the C minor Symphony Scherzo : —
Rhythm of five bars is not, as a rule, produc
tive of good effect, and cannot be used — any
more than the other unusual rhythms — for long
together. It is best when consisting of four bars
followed by one, and is most often found in
compound form — that is, as eight bars followed
by two.
Minuet, Mozart's Symphony in C (No. 6).
n p ^ 1 ! . , J V- ,
•
^ j
p
™
•
•I
*
™
• 4 (
v. iy
i- >
f
f
F F
O ' ^- -•--- r i l 11
1 ' r 7
tr tr
U,
=£=N
—i E-t-
-•— •-
F
^-p— -
I f
A very quaint effect is produced by the un
usual rhythm of seven. An impression is con
veyed that the eighth bar — a weak one — has got
left out through inaccurate sense of rhythm, as
so often happens with street-singers and the like.
Wagner has taken advantage of this in his ' Tanz
der Lehrbuben' ('Die Meistersinger'), thus:—
It is obvious that all larger symmetrical groups
than the above need be taken no heed of, as they
are reducible to the smaller periods. One more
point remains to be noticed, which, a beauty in
older and simpler music, is becoming a source of
weakness in modern times. This is the disguising
or concealing of the rhythm by strong accents or
change of harmony in weak bars. The last move-
RHYTHM.
125
ment of Beethoven's Pianoforte Sonata in D
minor (op. 31) affords a striking instance of this.
At the very outset
^ ~~
•
• i r • •
a • 1
J\ n ft
r H •
H
CO) R * 1
-L — - — *-4— 9
— 2 — *
Us*-1
-dsH
m' A
i* i ft *( »H
r- «.^ — >
'^ h K *\
1* p
* ^
Q
1
__^ x s
*
f m *
1 1 * • 1
P a
i H 1
i H
i*
r P
Ha
us.
f - ' P
" .-1
i --, — ,<
^ — -r
• > P
> >
e
•
p
F
we are led to think that the change of bass at
the fourth bar, and again at the eighth, indicates
a new rhythmic period, whereas the whole move
ment is in four-bar rhythm as unchanging as the
semiquaver figure which pervades it. The device
has the effect of preventing monotony in a move
ment constructed almost entirely on one single
figure. The same thing occurs in the middle of
the first movement of the Sonatina (op. 79, Presto
alia Tedesca). Now in both of these cases the
accent of the bars is so simple that the ear can
afford to hunt for the rhythm and is pleased by
the not too subtle artifice ; but in slower and less
obviously accented music such a device would be
out of place: there the rhythm requires to be
impressed on the hearer rather than concealed
from him.
On analysing any piece of music it will be
found that whether the ultimate distribution of
the accents be binary or ternary, the larger divi
sions nearly always run in twos, the rhythms
of three, four, or seven being merely occasionally
used to break the monotony. This is only na
tural, for, as before remarked, the comprehensi-
bility of music is in direct proportion to the
simplicity of its rhythm, irregularity in this
point giving a disturbed and emotional character
to the piece, until, when all attention to rhythm
is ignored, the music becomes incoherent and
incomprehensible, though not of necessity dis
agreeable. In 'Tristan and Isolde' Wagner has
endeavoured, with varying success, to produce
a composition of great extent, from which rhythm
in its larger signification shall be wholly absent.
One consequence of this is that he has written
the most tumultuously emotional opera extant j
but another is that the work is a mere chaos to,
the hearer until it is closely- studied. Actual
popularity and general appreciation for such
music is out of all question for some generations
to come. [F. C.]
RIBATTUTA (re-striking), an old contrivance
in instrumental music, gradually accelerating the
pace of a phrase of two notes, until a trill was
arrived at. Beethoven has preserved it for ever in
the Overture to Leonore ' No. 3 ' (bar 75 of A llegro).
#/P A/P */f» /
.• fe A- £ -S*- ^~f-S=& fir ff rf- ^>
-^H V,; p^^p^-TT^FgB^
See too another passage further on, before the
Flute solo. [See TRILL.] [G.]
EIBS (Fr. Eclisses ; Germ. Zarge). The sides
of stringed instruments of the violin type, con
necting the back and the belly. They consist
of six (sometimes only five) pieces of maple, and
should be of the same texture as the back, and
if possible cut out of the same piece. After
being carefully planed to the right thickness,
they are bent to the required shape, and then
glued together on the mould by means of the
corner and top and bottom blocks, the angles
being feather-edged. The back, the linings and
the belly are then added, and the body of the
violin is then complete. The ribs ought to be
slightly increased in depth at the broader end of
the instrument, but many makers have neglected
this rule. The flatter the model, the deeper the
ribs require to be ; hence the viol tribe, having
perfectly flat backs and bellies of slight elevation,
are very deep in the ribs. The oldest violins were
often very deep in the ribs, but many of them
have been since cut down. Carlo Bergonzi and
his contemporaries had a fashion of making
shallow ribs, and often cut down the ribs of
older instruments, thereby injuring their tone
beyond remedy. Instruments made of ill-chosen
and unseasoned wood will crack and decay in the
ribs sooner than in any other part : but in the
best instruments the ribs will generally outlast
both belly and back. Some old makers were in
the habit of glueing a strip of linen inside the
ribs. [E.J.P.]
RICCI, LUIGI, born in Naples June 8, 1805,
in 1814 entered the Royal Conservatorio, then
under Zingarelli, of which he became in 1819
one of the sub-professors together with Bellini.
His first work, ' L'Impresario in angustie,' was
performed by the students of the Conservatorio
in 1823, and enthusiastically applauded. In
the following four years he wrote ' La Cena fra-
stornata,' 'L'Abate Taccarella/ still very popular,
'II Diavolo condannato a prender moglie,' and
'La Lucerna d'Epitteto,' all for the Teatro Nuovo.
In 1828 his ' Ulisse,' at the San Carlo, was a
failure. In 1829 'II Colombo' in Parma and
'L'Orfanella di Ginevra' in Naples were both
successful, the latter being still performed in
many Italian theatres. The winter of 1829-30
was disastrous for Ricci, his four new operas (' II
Sonnambulo,' 'L'Eroina del Messico,' 'Annibale
in Torino,' and 'La Neve ') being all unsuccessful.
In the autumn of 1831 he produced at La Scala
of Milan ' Chiara di Rosemberg,' and this opera,
performed by Grisi, Sacchi, Winter, Badioli, etc.,
was greatly applauded, and soon became successful
in all the theatres of Italy. ' II nuovo Figaro '
126
RICCI.
failed in Parma in 1832. In it sang Rozer, who
afterwards married Balfe. The same fate at
tended 'I due Sergenti' at La Scala in 1833,
where the following year he gave ' Un' Av ventura
di Scaramuccia,' which was a very great success,
and was translated into French by Flotow. The
same year ' Gli esposti/ better known as ' Eran
due ed or son tre,' was applauded in Turin, whilst
' Chi dura vince,' like Rossini's immortal ' Bar-
biere/ was hissed at Rome. It was afterwards
received enthusiastically at Milan and in many
other opera-houses of Europe. It was dedicated
to Louise Vernet, the wife of the great painter
Paul Delaroche, the friend of Ricci. In 1835
' Chiara di Montalbano' failed at the Scala, while
' La serva e 1'ussero ' was applauded in Pavia.
Ricci had thus composed twenty operas when
only thirty years old ; and although many of his
works had met with a genuine and well-deserved
success, he was still very poor and had to accept
the post of Kapellmeister of the Trieste Cathedral
and conductor of the Opera. In 1838 his 'Nozze
di Figaro ' was a fiasco in Milan, where Rossini
told him that its fall was due to the music being
too serious.
For the next six years Ricci composed nothing.
In 1844 he married Lidia Stoltz, by whom he had
two children, Adelaide, who in 1867 sang at the
Theatre des Italiens in Paris, but died soon after,
and Luigi, who resides in London. ' La Solitaria
delle Asturie' was given in Odessa in 1844;
'II Birraio di Preston' in Florence in 1847;
and in 1852 'La Festa di Piedigrotta' was very
successful in Naples. His last opera ' II Diavolo
a quattro ' was performed in Trieste in 1859.
Luigi Ricci composed in collaboration with his
brother FEDERICO ' II Colonnello,' given in Rome,
and ' M. de Chalumeaux,' in Venice, in 1835 ; in
1836 'II Disertore per amore ' for the San Carlo
in Naples, and ' L' Amante di richiamo ' given in
Turin in 1 846. Of these four operas, ' II Colon
nello ' alone had a well-deserved reception. But
Ricci's masterpiece, the opera which has placed
him in a very high rank among Italian com
posers, is ' Crispino e la Comare,' written in 1850
for Venice, and to which his brother Federico
partly contributed. This opera, one of the best
comic operas of Italy, is always and everywhere
applauded, being a happy mixture of fairy tales,
laughter, grace, and comicality.
Shortly after the production of 'II Diavolo a
quattro' in 1859, however, symptoms of insanity
showed themselves, and the malady soon became
violent. He was taken to an asylum at Prague,
his wife's birthplace, and died there Dec. 31,
1859. He was much mourned at Trieste; a
funeral ceremony was followed by a performance
of selections from his principal works, his bust
was placed in the lobby of the Opera-house, and
a pension was granted to his widow. He pub
lished two volumes of vocal pieces entitled ' Mes
Loisirs' and 'Les inspirations du The'' (Ricordi),
and he left in MS. a large number of composi
tions for the cathedral service. His brother,
FEDERICO, was born in Naples, Oct. 22, 1809,
entered the Royal Couservatorio of that town,
RICERCARE.
where his brother was then studying, and had the
good-fortune to receive his musical education from
Bellini and Zingarelli. In 1829 he went to live
with his brother until the marriage of the latter
in 1844. In 1837 he gave * La Prigione d'Edim-
burgo' in Trieste. The barcarola of this opera,
'Sulla poppa del mio brick,' is one of the most
popular melodies of Italy. In 1839 his 'Duello
sotto Richelieu ' was only moderately successful
at La Scala, but in 1841 'Michelangelo e Rolla1
was applauded in Florence. In it sang Signora
Strepponi, who afterwards married Verdi. ' Cor-
rado d'Altamura,' a lyric drama of some merit,
was given at La Scala before delighted audiences.
At the personal request of Charles Albert he
composed in r 842 a cantata for the marriage of
Victor Emmanuel, and another for a court festival.
In 1843 his 'Vallombra' failed at La Scala.
' Isabella de' Medici' (1844) in Trieste, ' Estella"
(1846) in Milan, 'Griselda' (1847) and 'I due
ritratti ' (1850) in Venice, were all failures. 'II
Marito e 1' Amante' was greatly applauded in
Vienna in 1852, but his last opera, 'II paniere
d'amore,' given there the following year, did not
succeed. He was then named Musical Director
of the Imperial Theatres of St. Petersburg, which
post he occupied for many years. Of the operas
written in collaboration with his brother we have
already spoken.
He however did not give up composing, but
brought out at the Fantaisies-Parisiennes, Paris,
'Une Folie a Rome' Jan. 30, 1869, with great
success. Encouraged by this he produced an
opera-comique in 3 acts, 'Le Docteur rose'
(Bouffes Parisiens, Feb. 10, 1872) and ' Une Fete
a Venise,' a reproduction of his earlier work, 'H
Marito e 1' Amante' (Athene'e, Feb. 15, 1872),
but both were entire failures. Shortly after this
Federico left Paris and retired to Conegliano in
Italy, where he died Dec. 10, 1877. He was
concerned partially or entirely in 19 operas. Of
his cantatas we have spoken. He also left 2
masses, 6 albums or collections of vocal pieces
(Ricordi), and many detached songs. [L.B.]
RICERCARE or RICERCATA (from new
care, ' to search out '), an Italian term of the
1 7th century, signifying a fugue of the closest
and most learned description. Frescobaldi's
Ricercari (1615), which are copied out in one
of Dr. Burney's note-books (Brit. Mus. Add.
MS. 11,588), are full of augmentations, diminu
tions, inversions, and other contrivances, in fact
recherchts or full of research. J. S. Bach has
affixed the name to the 6-part Fugue in his
' Musikalisches Opfer,' and the title of the whole
contains the word in its initials — Regis lussu
Cantio Et Reliqua Canonica Arte Resoluta. But
the term was also employed for a fanta-da on some
popular song, street-cry, or such similar theme.
Mr. Cummings has a MS. book, dated 1580-1600,
containing 22 ricercari by Cl. da Coreggio, Gia-
netto Palestina, A. Vuillaert, 0. Lasso, Clemens
non Papa, Cip. Rore, and others — fugues in 4 and
5 parts, on ' Ce moy de May,' ' Vestiva i colli,'
' La Rossignol,' ' Susan un jour,' and other appar
ently popular songs. This use of the word appear*
RICERCARE.
to have been earlier than the other, as pieces of
the kind by Adriano (1520-67) are quoted. [G.]
RICH, JOHN, son of Christopher Rich, patentee
of Drury Lane Theatre, was born in 1692. His
father, having been compelled to quit Drury
Lane, had erected a new theatre in Lincoln's Inn
Fields, but died in 17 14 when it was upon the
eve of being opened. John Rich then assumed
the management and opened the house about six
weeks after his father's death. Finding himself
unable to contend against the superior company
engaged at Drury Lane, he had recourse to the
introduction of a new species of entertainment —
pantomime — in which music, scenery, machinery 1,
and appropriate costumes formed the prominent
features. In these pieces he himself, under the
assumed name of Lun, performed the part of
Harlequin with such ability as to extort the
admiration of even the most determined opponents
of that class of entertainment. [See LINCOLN'S
INN FIELDS THEATRE, ii. 140; PANTOMIME, ii.
645 6.] Encouraged by success he at length decided
upon the erection of a larger theatre, the stage of
which should afford greater facilities for scenic
and mechanical display, and accordingly built
the first Covent Garden Theatre, which he opened
Dec. 7, 1732. Hogarth produced a caricature on
the occasion of the removal to the new house,
entitled ' Rich's Glory, or his Triumphal Entry
into Covent Garden,' a copy of which will be
found in Wilkinson's ' Londina Illustrata.' He
conducted the new theatre with great success
until his death, relying much upon the attraction
of his pantomimes and musical pieces, but by no
means neglecting the regular drama. In his
early days he had attempted acting, but failed.
He died Nov. 26, 1761, and was buried Dec. 4 in
Hillingdon churchyard, Middlesex. [W.H.H.]
RICHARD CCEUR DE LION. An opdra-
coinique in 3 acts ; words by Sedaine, music by
Gre"try. Produced at the Opdra Comique Oct. 21,
1784. The piece has a certain historical value.
One of the airs, 'Une fievre brulante,' was for
long a favourite subject for variations. Beetho
ven wrote a set of 8 upon it (in C major), pub
lished in Nov. 1798, having probably heard the
air at a concert of Weigl's in the preceding March.
Another set of 7 (also in C) were for long attri
buted to Mozart, but are now decided not to be
by him. The air ' O Richard, o mon roi, 1'univers
t'abbandonne ' was played on a memorable occa
sion in the early stage of the French Revolution—
at the banquet at Versailles on Oct. 1, 1 789. [G.]
RICHARDS, BRINLET, son of Henry Richards,
organist of St. Peter's, Carmarthen, was born in
1819, and intended for the medical profession,
but preferred the study of music, and became a
pupil of the Royal Academy of Music, where
he obtained the King's scholarship in 1835, and
again in 1837. He soon gained a high position in
London as a pianist. As a composer he has been
very successful, his song ' God bless the Prince of
1 Most of Rich's machinery was invented by John Hoole. the trans
lator of Tasso's ' Gerusalemme Liberata ' and other works, and his
father, Samuel Hoole, an eminent -watchmaker.
EICHAULT.
127
Wales ' having reached a high pitch of popularity,
even out of England, and his sacred songs, part
songs, and pianoforte pieces having been most
favourably received. He compooed additional
songs for the English version of Auber's ' Crown
Diamonds,' when produced at Drury Lane in
1846. He has especially devoted himself to the
study of Welsh music (upon which he has
lectured), and many of his compositions have
been inspired by his enthusiastic love for his
native land. He exerted himself greatly in pro
moting the interests of the South Wales Choral
Union on its visits to London in 1872 and 1873,
when they successfully competed at the National
Music Meetings at the Crystal Palace. As a
teacher Mr. Richards is deservedly esteemed anu
has a very large clientele in London. [W.H.H.]
RICHARDSON, JOSEPH. An eminent flute-
player, born in 1814, and died March 22, 1862.
He was engaged in most of the London orchestras,
was solo player at Jullien's concerts for many
years, and afterwards became principal flute in the
Queen's private band. His neatness and rapidity
of execution were extraordinary, and were the
great features of his playing. He composed
numerous fantasias for his instrument, usually
of an extremely brilliant and difficult character.
Some of his variations are still popular among
flute-players, such as * There's nae luck about the
house ' — to which no one but Richardson himself
has ever done justice, Auber's ' Les Montagnards,'
the Russian National Hymn, etc. [G.]
RICHARDSON, VAUGHAN, was in 1685 a
chorister of the Chapel Royal, under Dr. Blow.
He was possibly a nephew of Thomas Richard
son (alto singer, gentleman of the Chapel Royal
from 1664 to his death, July 23, 1712, and lay
vicar of Westminster Abbey), and a brother of
Thomas Richardson, who was his fellow chorister.
About 1695 he was appointed organist of Win
chester Cathedral. In 1701 he published 'A
collection of Songs for one, two and three voices,'
accompany'd with instruments.' He was author
of some church music : a fine anthem, ' 0 Lord
God of my salvation,' and an Evening Service in
C (composed in 1713), are in theTudway Collec
tion (Harl. MSS. 7341 and 7342), and another
anthem, 'O how amiable,' also in Tudway, and
printed in Page's ' Harmonia Sacra ' ; others are
in the books of different cathedrals. He was also
composer of 'An Entertainment of new Musick,
composed on the Peace ' [of Ryswick], 1697 ; 'A
Song in praise of St. Cecilia,' written for a cele
bration at Winchester about 1700, and a ' set of
vocal and instrumental music,' written for a like
occasion in 1703. He died in 1729, and not, as
commonly stated, in 1715. [W.H.H.]
RICHAULT, CHARLES SIMON, head of a
family of celebrated French music-publishers,
born at Chartres, May 10, 1780, came early to
Paris, and served his apprenticeship in the music-
trade with J. J. Momigny. From him he ac
quired a taste for the literature of music and
chamber compositions ; and when he set up for
himself at No. 7, Rue Grange Bateliere in 1805,
128
RICHAULT.
the first works lie published were classical. He
soon perceived that there was an opening in
Paris for editions of the best works of German
musicians, and the early efforts of French com
posers of promise. His calculation proved cor
rect, and his judgment was so sound that his
business increased rapidly, and he was soon
obliged to move into larger premises in the Boule
vard Poissonniere, first at No. 16, and then at
No. 26. Here he published Mozart's Concertos
in 8vo score, and other works of the classical
composers of Germany, and acquired the bulk of
the stock of the firms of Frey, Naderman, Sieber,
Pleyel, Petit, Erard, and Delahante. He moved
in 1862 to No. 4 in the Boulevard des Italiens,
at the precise spot where the Boulevard Hauss-
mann would have come in if it had been finished.
In this house he died, Feb. 20, 1866, well-known
as a publisher of judgment and ability, a man
of keen intellect, and a pleasant social companion.
His son,
GUILLAUME SIMON, born in Paris Nov. 2,
1806, had long been his father's partner, and
continued in the old line of serious music. At
the same time he realised that in so important a
business it was well that the Italian school should
be represented, and accordingly bought the stock
of the publisher Pacini. On the death of this good
man, Feb. 7, 1877, his son,
LEON, born in Paris Aug. 6, 1839, resolved to
give a fresh impetus to the firm, which already
possessed 18,000 publications. Bearing in mind
that his grandfather had been the first to publish
Beethoven's Symphonies and Mozart's Concertos
in score ; to make known in France the oratorios
of Bach and Handel, and the works of Schubert,
Mendelssohn, and Schumann ; to bring out the
first operas of Ambroise Thomas and Victor
Masse" ; to encourage Berlioz when his c Dam
nation de Faust' was received with contempt,
and to welcome the orchestral compositions of
Reber and Gouvy ; M. Le"on Bichault above all
determined to maintain the editions of the Ger
man classical masters which had made the for
tune of the firm. Retaining all the works —
didactic, dramatic, sacred, vocal, and instru
mental — which still do honour to his establish
ment, he has carefully eliminated all obsolete
and forgotten music. He has moreover already
begun to issue new editions of all compositions
of value of which the plates are worn out. His
intelligent administration of his old and honour
able business procured him a silver medal at the
International Exhibition of 1878, the highest
recompense open to music-publishers, the jury
having refused them the gold medal.
A new catalogue of Richault's publications is
in preparation, the old ones having long become
obsolete. It will form a large volume, and will
not in all probability be ready till 1882. [G. C.]
RICHTER, ERNST FRIEDRICH EDUARD, son of
a schoolmaster, born Oct. 24, 1808, at Grosschonau
in Lusatia ; from his eleventh year attended the
Gymnasium at Zittau, managed the choir, and
arranged independent performances. In 1831 he
went to Leipzig to study with Weinlig, the then
RICHTER.
Cantor, and made such progress that soon after
the foundation of the Conservatorium, in 1843,
he became one of the professors of harmony and
counterpoint. Up to 1847 he conducted the Sinff.
akademie ; he was afterwards organist of the
Nicolai and Peters Neukirchen. After Haupt-
mann's death, Jan. 3, 1868, he succeeded him as
Cantor of the St. Thomas school. Of his books,
the ' Lehrbuch der Harmonielehre ' (i2th ed.
1876) has been translated into Dutch, Swedish,
Italian, Russian, Polish, and English. The ' Lehre
von der Fuge ' has passed through three editions,
and ' Vom Contrapunct ' through two. The Eng
lish translations of all these are by Franklin
Taylor, and were published by Cramer & Co. in
1864, 1878, and 1874 respectively. Richter also
published a ' Catechism of Organ-building.' Of
his many compositions de circonstance the best
known is the Cantata for the Schiller Festival
in 1859. Other works are — an oratorio, 'Christus
der Erloser ' (March 8, 1849), masses, psalms,
motets, organ-pieces, string-quartets, and sonatas
for PF. He became one of the King's Professors
in 1868, died at Leipzig, April 9, 1879, and was
succeeded as Cantor by W. RUST. [E.G.]
RICHTER, HANS, celebrated conductor, born
April 4, 1843, at Raab in Hungary, where his
father was Capellmeister of the cathedral. His
mother was also musical, and is still a teacher of
singing at Pesth. The father died in 1853, and
Hans was then placed at the Lowenburg Convict-
School in Vienna. Thence he went into the choir
of the Court chapel, and remained there for four
years. In 1859 he entered the Conservatorium,
and studied the horn under Kleinecke, and theory
under Sechter. After a lengthened engagement as
horn-player in the orchestra of the Karnthnerthor
opera he was recommended by Esser to Wagner,
went to him at Lucerne, remained there from
Oct. 1866 to Dec. 1867, ar|d made the first fair
copy of the score of the ' Meistersinger.' In 1868
he accepted the post of conductor at the Hof- und
National Theatre, Munich, and remained there
for some length of time. He next visited Paris,
and after a short residence there, proceeded
to Brussels for the production of 'Lohengrin'
(March 22, 1870). He then returned to Wagner
at Lucerne, assisted at the first performance
of the 'Siegfried Idyll' (Dec. 1870), and made
the fair copy of the score of the 'Niebelun-
gen Ring' for the engraver. Early in 1871 he
went to Pesth as chief conductor of the National
Theatre, a post to which he owes much of his
great practical knowledge of the stage and stage
business. In Jan. 18/5 he conducted a grand
orchestral concert in Vienna, which had the effect
of attracting much public attention to him, and
accordingly, after the retirement of Herbeck
(April 1875) from the direction of the Court
Opera Theatre — where he was succeeded by
Jauner — and of Dessoff from the same theatre,
Richter was invited to take the post vacated by
the latter, which he entered upon in the autumn
of 1875, concurrently with the conductorship of
the Philharmonic Concerts. He had already been
conducting the rehearsals of the 'Niebelungen
[F.GJ
RICHTER.
Ring' at Bayreuth, and in 1876 he directed the
whole. of the rehearsals and performances of the
Festival there, and, at the close of the third set
of performances, received the order of Maximilian
from the King of Bavaria, and that of the Falcon
from the Grand Duke of Weimar. In 1877 he
produced the Walkyrie in Vienna, and followed
it in 1878 by the other portions of the tetralogie.
In 1878 he was made capellmeister, and received
the order of Franz Josef. In 1879 (May 5-12),
80 (May 10- June 14), and 81 (May 9 -June 23)
he conducted important orchestral concerts in
London, which excited much attention, chiefly for
his knowledge of the scores of Beethoven's sym
phonies and other large works, which he con
ducted without book.
Herr Richter is certainly one of the very first
of living conductors. He owes this position in
great measure to the fact of his intimate practical
acquaintance with the technik of the instruments
in the orchestra, especially the wind, to a degree
in which he stands alone. As a musician he is
a self-made man, and enjoys the peculiar advan
tages which spring from that fact. His devotion
to his orchestra is great, and the present high
standard and position of the band of the Vienna
opera house is due to him. He is a great master
of crescendo and decrescendo. Perhaps he leans
too much to the encouragement of ' virtuosity' in
his orchestra. But as a whole, what he directs
will always be finely played.
In correction of a previous statement we may
say that his mother, Mine. Richter von Innffeld,
formerly a distinguished soprano singer, now lives
in Vienna as a teacher of singing. Her method of
producing the voice — affecting especially the soft
palate and other parts of the back of the mouth —
has been very successful, and attracted the notice
of Prof. Helmholtz, who in 1872 investigated it,
and wrote her a letter of strong approval. [F. G.]
RICORDI, GIOVANNI, founder of the well-
known music-publishing house in Milan, where
he was born in 1785, and died March 15, 1853.
He made his first hit with the score of Mosca's
' Pretendenti delusi." Since that time Ricordi
lias published for all the great Italian maestri,
down to Verdi and Bo'ito, and has far out
stripped all rivals. His ' Gazetta musicale,'
edited with great success by Mazzucati, has
had much influence on his prosperity. The
firm possesses the whole of the original scores of
the operas they have published — a most inter
esting collection. Giovanni's son and successor
TITO further enlarged the business, and at this
moment the stock consists of over 40,000,000
pages, or nearly 50,000 items, of music. The
catalogue issued in 1875 contains 738 pages large
8vo. For some years past Tito has been disabled
by illness, and the present head of the firm is
his son GIDLIO DI TITO, born in 1835, who is a
practised writer, a skilled draughtsman, a com
poser of drawing-room music, and in all respects
a thoroughly cultivated man.
This notice must not end without a mention of
Paloschi's 'Annuario musicale,' a useful and ac
curate calendar of musical date,s, published by
VOL. III. PT. 2.
RIEDEL.
129
this excellent firm, the second edition of which
was issued in 1878. [F.G.]
RIDOTTO, an Italian term for an assembly
with music, and usually with masks.
They went to the Kidotto— 'tis a hall
"Where people dance and sup and dance again ;
The proper name, perhaps, were a mask'd ball,
But that 's of no importance to my strain,
says Byron in ' Beppo,' writing from Venice in
1817. They were known in Italy much earlier
than that, and had spread to both Germany and
England. They are frequently mentioned by
Horace Walpole under the name 'Ridotto,' and
were one of the attractions at Vauxhall and
Ranelagh in the middle of the last century. In
Germany and France a French version of the
name was adopted — REDOUTE. [See p. 89]. [G.]
RIEDEL, CARL, born Oct. 6, 1827, at Kronen-
berg in the Rhine provinces. Though always
musically inclined he was educated for trade,
and up to 1848 pursued the business of a silk
dyer. Being in Lyons during the Revolution of
that year the disturbance to his business and the
excitement of the moment drove him to the
resolution of forsaking trade and devoting him
self to music as a profession. He returned
home and at once began serious study under the
direction of CARL WILHELM, then an obscure
musician at Crefeld, but destined to be widely
known as the author of the ' Wacht am Rhein.'
Late in 1849 Riedel entered the Leipzig Con-
servatorium, where he made great progress under
Moscheles, Hauptmann, Becker, and Plaidy.
After leaving the Conservatorium the direction
of his talent was for some time uncertain. He
had however for long had a strong predilection
for the vocal works of the older masters of
Germany and Italy. Early in 1854 ne practised
and performed in a private society at Leipzig
Astorga's 'Stabat,' Palestrina's ' Improperia/
and Leo's ' Miserere,' and this led him to found
a singing society of his own, which began on
May 17, 1854, with a simple quartet of male
voices, and was the foundation of the famous
Association which, under the name of the
4 Riedelsche Verein,' was so celebrated in Leip
zig. Their first public concert was held in Novem
ber, 1855. '^'ne reality of the attempt was soon
recognised ; members flocked to the society ;
and its first great achievement was a performance
of Bach's B minor Mass, April 10, 1859. At
that time Riedel appears to have practised only
ancient music, but this rale was by no means
maintained; and in the list of the works per
formed by the Verein we find Beethoven's Mass
in D, Kiel's ' Christus,' Berlioz's Requiem, and
Liszt's ' Graner Mass ' and ' St. Elizabeth.' Rie-
del's devotion to his choir was extraordinary:
he was not only its Conductor, but Librarian,
Secretary, Treasurer, all in one. . His interest
in societies outside his own, and in the welfare
of music, was always ready and always effective,
and many of the best Vocal Associations of
North Germany owe their success to his advice
and help. The programmes of the public per
formances of his society show the fin mes of many
K
130
RIEDEL.
composers who were indebted to him for their
first chance of being heard, and of much music
which but for him would probably have slum
bered on the shelf till now. He was one of
the founders of the ' Beethovenstiftung,' and
an earnest supporter of the Wagner perform
ances at Bayreuth in 1876. His own compo
sitions are chiefly part-songs for men's voices,
but he has edited several important ancient
works by Praetorius, Franck, Eccard, and other
old German writers, especially a ' Passion ' by
Heinrich Schutz, for which he selected the best
portions of 4 Passions by that master — a pro
ceeding certainly deserving all that can be said
against it. [G.]
EIEM, WILHELM FRIEDRICH, born at Colleda
in Thuringia, Feb. 17, 1779, was one °^- ^- ^&~
ler's pupils in the St. Thomas school at Leipzig.
In 1807 he was made organist of the Reformed
church there, and in 1814 of the St. Thomas
school itself. In 1822 he was called to Bremen to
take the cathedral organ and be Director of the
Singakademie, where he remained till his death,
April 20, 1837. He was an industrious writer.
His cantata for the anniversary of the Augs
burg Confession 1830 (for which Mendelssohn's
Reformation Symphony was intended) is dead ;
so are his quintets, quartets, trios, and other
large works, but some of his 8 sonatas and 12
sonatinas are still used for teaching purposes.
He left 2 books of studies for the PF., which
are out of print, and 16 progressive exercises. [G.]
RIENZI DER LETZTE DER TRIBUNEN
(the last of the Tribunes). An opera in 5 acts ;
words (founded on Bulwer's novel) and music by
Wagner. He adopted the idea in Dresden in
1837 ; two acts were finished early in 1839, and
the opera was produced at Dresden Oct. 20, 1842.
'Rienzi' was brought out in French (Meitter and
Guillaume) at the Theatre Lyrique, April 6, 1 869,
and in English at Her Majesty's Theatre, London
(Carl Rosa), Jan. 27, 1879. [G.]
RIES. A distinguished family of musicians.
I. JOHANN RIES, native of Benzheim on the
Rhine, born 1723, was appointed Court trumpeter
to the Elector of Cologne at Bonn, May 2, 1 747,
and violinist in the Capelle, Mar. 5, 1754. On
April 27, 1764, his daughter Anna Maria was
appointed singer. In 1 774 she married Ferdinand
Drewer, violinist in the band, and remained
first soprano till the break-up in 1794. Her
father died 1786 or 7. Her brother, FRANZ
ANTON, was born at Bonn, Nov. 10, 1755, an(^
died there Nov. i, 1846. He was an infant
phenomenon on the violin ; learned from J. P.
Salomon, and was able to take his father's
place in the orchestra at the age of n. His
salary began when he was 19, and in 1779 it was
1 60 thalers per annum. At that date he visited
Vienna, and made a great success as a solo and
quartet player. But he elected to remain, on
poor pay, in Bonn, and was rewarded by having
Beethoven as his pupil and friend. During the
poverty of the Beethoven family, and through the
RIES.
misery caused by the death of Ludwig's mother
in 1787, Franz Ries stood by them like a real
friend. In 1794 the French arrived, and the
Elector's establishment was broken up. Some of
the members of the band dispersed, but Ries
remained, and documents are 1 preserved which
show that after the passing away of the invasion
he was to have been Court-musician. Events
however were otherwise ordered ; he remained
in Bonn, and at Godesberg, where he had a little
house, till his death ; held various small offices,
culminating in the Bonn city government in
1800, taught the violin, and brought up his
children well. He assisted Wegeler in his No
tices of Beethoven, was present at the unveiling
of Beethoven's statue in 1845, had a Doctor's
degree and the order of the Red Eagle conferred
on him, and died, as we have said, Nov. I, 1846,
aged 91 all but 9 days.
2. Franz's son FERDINAND, who with the Arch
duke Rudolph enjoys the distinction of being
Beethoven's pupil, was born at Bonn Nov. 28,
1784. He was brought up from his cradle to
music. His father taught him the pianoforte and
violin, and B. Romberg the cello. In his child
hood he lost an eye through the small-pox. After
the break-up of the Elector's band he remained
three years at home, working very hard at theo
retical and practical music, scoring the quartets
of Haydn and Mozart, and arranging the Creation,
the Seasons, and the Requiem with such ability
that they were all three published by Simrock.
In 1801 he went to Munich to study under
Winter, in a larger field than he could com
mand at home. Here he was so badly off as to
be driven to copy music at ^d. a sheet. But
poor as his income was he lived within it, and
when after a few months Winter left Munich
for Paris, Ries had saved 7 ducats. With this he
went to Vienna in October 1801, taking a letter
from his father to Beethoven. Beethoven re
ceived him well, and when he had read the
letter said, * I can't answer it now ; but write
and tell him that I have not forgotten the time
when my mother died" ; and knowing how miser
ably poor the lad was, he on several occasions
gave him money unasked, for which he would
accept no return. The next three years Ries spent
in Vienna. Beethoven took a great deal of pains
with his pianoforte-playing, but would teach him
nothing else. He however prevailed on Albrechts-
berger to take him as a pupil in composition.
The lessons cost a ducat each ; Ries had in some
way saved up 28 ducats, and therefore had 28
lessons. Beethoven also got him an appointment
as pianist to Count Browne the Russian charg^
d'affaires, and at another time to Count Lich-
nowsky. The pay for these services was prob
ably not over-abundant, but it kept him, and the
position gave him access to the best musical
society. Into Ries's relations with Beethoven we
need not enter here. They are touched upon in
the sketch of the great master in vol. i. of this
work, and they are fully laid open in Ries's own
1 See the curious and important lists and memorandums, pub
lished for the first time in Thayer's 'Beethoven,' i. 248.
HIES.
invaluable notices. He had a great deal to bear,
and considering the secrecy and imperiousness
which Beethoven often threw into his intercourse
with every one, there was probably much un
pleasantness in the relationship. Meantime ^ of
course Hies must have become saturated with
the music of his great master ; a thing which
could hardly tend to foster any little originality
he may ever have possessed.
As a citizen of Bonn he was amenable to the
French conscription, and in 1805 was summoned
to appear there in person. He left in Sept. 1805,
made the journey on foot via Prague, Dresden, and
Leipzig, reached Coblentz within the prescribed
limit of time, and was then dismissed on account
of the loss of his eye. He then went on to Paris,
and existed in misery for apparently at least two
years, at the end of which time he was advised
to try Russia. On Aug. 27, 1808, he was again
in Vienna, and soon afterwards received from
Eeichardt an offer of the post of Kapellmeister
to Jerome Bonaparte, King of Westphalia, at
Cassel, which Reichardt alleged had been re
fused by Beethoven. Hies behaved with perfect
loyalty and straightforwardness in the matter.
Before replying, he endeavoured to find out
from Beethoven himself the real state of the
case ; but Beethoven having adopted the idea
that Ries was trying to get the post over his
head, would not see him, and for three weeks
behaved to him with an incredible degree of
cruelty and insolence. When he could be made
to listen to the facts he was sorry enough, but
the opportunity was gone.
The occupation of Vienna (May 12, 1809) by
the French was not favourable to artistic life.
Ries however, as a French subject, was free to
wander. He accordingly went to Cassel, pos
sibly with some lingering hopes, played at Court,
and remained till the end of February 1810,
very much applauded and feted, and making
money — but had no offer of a post. From Cassel he
went by Hamburg and Copenhagen to Stockholm,
where we find him in Sept. 1810, making both
money and reputation. He had still his eye on
Russia, but between Stockholm and Petersburg
the ship was taken by an English man-of-war,
and all the passengers were turned out upon an
island in the Baltic. In Petersburg he found
Bernhard Romberg, and the two made a successful
townee, embracing places as wide apart as Kieff,
Reval and Riga. The burning of Moscow (Sept.
1812) put a stop to his progress in that direction,
and we next find him again at Stockholm in April
1813, en route to England. By the end of the
month he was in London.
Here he found his countryman and his father's
friend, Salomon, who received him cordially and
introduced him to the Philharmonic Concerts.
His first appearance there was March 14, 1814,
in his own PF. Sestet. His symphonies, over
tures, and chamber works frequently occur in the
programmes, and he himself appears from time
to time as a PF. player, but rarely if ever with
works of Beethoven's. ' Mr. Ries,' says a writer
in the 'Harmonicou' of March 1824, 'is justly
RIES.
131
celebrated as one of the finest pianoforte per
formers of the day ; his hand is powerful and his
execution certain, often surprising ; but his playing
is most distinguished from that of all others by
its romantic wildness.' Shortly after his arrival
he married an English lady of great attractions,
and he remained in London till 1824, one of the
most conspicuous figures of the musical world.
His sojourn here was a time of herculean labour.
His compositions numbered at their close nearly
1 80, including 6 fine symphonies; 4 overtures;
6 string quintets, and 14 do. quartets; 9 con
certos for PF, and orchestra ; an octet, a septet,
2 sextuors, and a quintet, for various instruments ;
3 PF. quartets, and 5 do. trios; 20 duets ^ for
PF. and violin ; 10 sonatas for PF. solo ; besides
a vast number of rondos, variations, fantasias,
etc., for the PF. solo and a 4 mains. Of thevse
38 are attributable to the tune of his residence
here, and they embrace 2 symphonies, 4 concertos,
a sonata, and many smaller pieces. As a pianist
and teacher he was very much in request. He
was an active member of the Philharmonic
Society. His correspondence with Beethoven
during the whole period is highly creditable to
him, proving his gratitude towards his master,
and the energy with which he laboured to promote
Beethoven's interests. That Beethoven profited
so little therefrom was no fault of Ries's.
Having accumulated a fortune adequate to the
demands of a life of comfort, he gave a farewell
concert in London, April 8, 1824, and removed
with his wife to Godesberg, near his native town,
where he had purchased a property. Though
a loser by the failure of a London Bank in
1825-6, he was able to live independently. About
1830 he removed to Frankfort. His residence
on the Rhine brought him into close contact with
the Lower Rhine Festivals, and he directed the
performances of the years 1825, 29, 30, 32, 34,
and 37, as well as those of 1826 and 28 in con
junction with Spohr and Klein respectively. [See
the list, vol. ii. p. 457.] In 1834 he was appointed
head of the town orchestra and Singakademie
at Aix-la-Chapelle. But he was too independent
to keep any post, and in 1836 he gave this up
and returned to Frankfort. In 1837 he assumed
the direction of the Cecilian Society there on the
death of Schelble, but this lasted a few months
only, for on Jan. 13, 1838, he died after a short
illness.
The principal works which he composed after
his return to Germany are ' Die Rauberbraut '
(the Robber's bride), which was first performed
in Frankfort probably in 1829, then in Leipzig,
July 4, and London, July 15, of the same
year, and often afterwards in Germany ; another
opera, known in Germany as 'Liska,' but pro
duced at the Adelphi, London, in English, as
'The Sorcerer,' by Arnold's Company, Aug. 4,
1831 ; an oratorio, 'Der Sieg des Glaubens' (the
Triumph of the Faith), Berlin, 1835 ; and a
second oratorio, ' Die Kb'nige Israels ' (the Kings
of Israel), Aix-la-Chapelle, 1837. All these
works however are dead. Beethoven once said
of his compositions. ' he imitates me too much.'
K2
132
RIES.
He caught the style and the phrases, but he
could not catch the immortality of his master's
work. Technically great as much that he com
posed was, that indescribable something, that
touch of nature, which, in music as elsewhere,
makes the whole world kin, was wanting. One
work of his, however, will live — the admirable
' Biographical Notices of Ludwig van Beethoven,'
which he published in conjunction with Dr.
Wegeler (Coblentz, 1838). The two writers,
though publishing together, have fortunately kept
their contributions quite distinct; Ries's occupies
from pp. 76 to 163 of a little duodecimo volume,
and of these the last 35 pages are occupied by
Beethoven's letters. His own portion, short as
it is, is excellent, and it is hardly too much to
say that within his small limits he is equal to
Boswell. The work is translated into French by
Le Gentil (Dentu, 1862), and partially into Eng
lish by Moscheles, as an Appendix to his version
of Schindler's Life of Beethoven. [ A.W.T.]
3. HUBERT, brother of the preceding, was born
at Bonn in 1802. He made his first studies as a
violinist under his father, and afterwards under
Spohr. Hauptmann was his teacher in composi
tion. Since 1824 he has lived at Berlin. In that
year he entered the band of the Konigstadter
Theatre, and in the following year became a mem
ber of the Royal band. In 1835 he was appointed
Director of the Philharmonic Society at Berlin.
In 1 836 he was nominated Concertmeister, and in
1839 elected a member of the Royal Academy of
Arts. A thorough musician and a solid violinist,
he has ever since been held in great esteem as a
leader, and more especially as a methodical aftd con
scientious teacher. His Violin-School for beginners
is a very meritorious work, eminently practical,
and widely used. He has published two violin-
concertos, studies and duets for violins, and some
quartets. An English edition of the Violin-School
appeared in 1873 (Hofmeister). Three of his sons
have gained reputation as musicians : —
Louis, violinist, born at Berlin in 1830, pupil
of his father and of Vieuxtemps, has, since 1852,
been settled in London, where he enjoys great
and deserved reputation as violinist and teacher.
He was a member of the Quartet of the
Musical Union from 1855 to 1870, and has
held the second violin at the Monday Popular
Concerts from their beginning in 1859, to the pre
sent time. He played a solo at the Crystal Palace
Oct. 29, 1864.
ADOLPH, pianist, born at Berlin in 1837. He
is a pupil of Kullak for the piano, and of Boehmer
for composition, and lives in London as a piano
forte teacher. He has published a number of
compositions for the piano, and some songs.
FRANZ, violinist and composer, was born at
Berlin in 1846. He studied first under his
father (violin), and under Boehmer and Kiel
(composition). He afterwards entered the Con
servatoire at Paris as a pupil of Massart, and
gained the first prize for violin-playing in 1868.
Some of his compositions, especially two suites
for violin, have met with considerable success, i
He visited London in 1870 and played at the
RIETZ.
Crystal Palace. He has published an overture, two
quartets, a quintet, and a large number of songs.
Compelled by ill -health to give up violin -playing
entirely, he established a music-publishing busi
ness at Dresden in 1874. [P-D-]
RIETER-BIEDERMANN. An eminent
German firm of music-publishers. The founder
was Jacob Melchior Rieter-Biedermann (born
May 14, 1811 ; died Jan. 25, 1876), who in
June 1849 opened a retail business and lending-
library at Winterthur. The first work published
by the house was Kirchner's 'Albumblatter/
op. 7, on April 29, 1 856 ; since then the business
has continually improved and increased. On
March i, 1862, a publishing branch was opened
at Leipzig. The stock catalogue of the firm
includes music by Berlioz, Brahms (PF. Concerto,
PF. Quintet, Requiem, Magelone, Romanzen,
May-songs, etc.) ; A. Dietrich ; J. 0. Grimm ;
Gernsheim ; Herzogenberg ; F. Hiller ; Holstein ;
Kirchner ; Lachner ; F. Marschner ; Mendels
sohn (op. 98, nos. 2, 3 ; op. 103, 105, 1 06, 108, 115,
116); Raff; Reinecke ; Schumann (op. 130,
137, 138, 140, 142) ; Schultz-Beuthen, etc. — in
all more than 1 200 works. [G.]
RIETZ (originally RITZ l) EDUAED, the elder
brother of Julius Rietz, an excellent violinist,
was born at Berlin in 1801. He studied first
under his father, a member of the royal band, and
afterwards for some time under RODE. He died
too young to acquire a more than local reputa
tion, but his name will always be remembered
in connection with Mendelssohn, who had the
highest possible opinion of his powers as an
executant,2 and who counted him amongst his
dearest and nearest friends. It was for Ritz that
he wrote the Octet, which is dedicated to him,
as well as the Sonata for PF. and Violin, op. 4.
For some years Rietz was a member of the royal
band, but as his health failed him in 1824 he
had to quit his appointment and even to give up
playing. He founded and conducted an orchestral
society at Berlin, with considerable success — but
continued to sink, and died of consumption Jan.
23, 1832. Mendelssohn's earlier letters teem
with affectionate references to him, and the
news of his death, which he received at Paris on
his birthday, affected him deeply.3 The Andante
in Mendelssohn's String Quintet, op. 1 8, was
composed at Paris ' in memory of E. Ritz,' and
is dated on the autograph 'Jan. 23, 1832,' and
entitled 'Nachruf.' [P.D.]
RIETZ, JULIUS, younger brother of the pre
ceding, violoncellist, composer, and eminent con
ductor, was born at Berlin Dec. 28, 1812.
Brought up under the influence of his father and
brother, and the intimate friend of Mendelssohn,
tie received his first instruction on the violoncello
Prom Schmidt, a member of the royal band, and
afterwards from Bernhard Romberg and Moritz
1 Uniformly so spelt by Mendelssohn.
2 'I long earnestly,' says he, in a letter from Rome, 'for his vioMnand
lis depth of feeling ; they come vividly before my mind when I see
his beloved neat handwriting.'
; :\lt-n<1elssohn's Letters from Italy and Switzerland, English Trans
lation, p. 327.
RIETZ.
Ganz. Zelter was his teacher in composition.
Having gained considerable proficiency on his
instrument, he obtained, at the age of 16, an
appointment in the band of the Konigstadter
Theatre, where he also achieved his first success
as a composer by writing incidental music for
Holtei's drama, ' Lorbeerbaum und Bettelstab.'
In 1834 he went to Diisseldorf as second con
ductor of the opera. Mendelssohn, who up to
his death showed a warm interest in Rietz, was
at that time at the head of the opera, and on his
resignation in the summer of 1835, R-ietz became
his successor. He did not however remain long
in that position, for, as early as 1836, he accepted,
under the title of 'Stadtischer Musikdirector,'
the post of conductor of the public subscription-
concerts, the principal choral society, and the
church-music at Diisseldorf. In this position he
remained for twelve years, gaining the reputation
of an excellent conductor, and also appearing as
a solo violoncellist in most of the principal towns
of the Rhine-province. During this period he
wrote some of his most successful works — inci
dental music to dramas of Goethe, Calderon,
Immermann and others ; music for Goethe's Lie-
derspiel ' Jery and Bately ' — a kind of drawing-
room opera, and a very graceful work ; his 1st
Symphony in G minor ; three overtures — ' Hero
and Leander,'1 Concert overture in A major,
Lustspiel-overture — the latter two perhaps the
freshest and most popular of his compositions ;
the ' Altdeutscher Schlachtgesang ' and 'Dithy-
rambe ' — both for men's voices and orchestra, and
still stock-pieces in the repertoires of all German
male choral societies. He was six times chief
conductor, of the Lower Rhine Festivals — in 1845,
56, and 69 at Diisseldorf; in 1864, 67 and 73 at
Aix. [See vol. ii. p. 547.]
In 1847, after Mendelssohn's death, he took
leave of Diisseldorf, leaving Ferdinand Hiller as
his successor, and went to Leipzig as conductor
of the opera and the Singakadeniie. From 1848
we find him also at the head of the Gewand-
haus orchestra, and teacher of composition at the
Conservator! urn. In this position he remained
for thirteen years. Two operas, ' Der Corsar '
and 'Georg Neumark,' were failures, but his
Symphony in Eb had a great and lasting success.
At this period he began also to show Ms eminent
critical powers by carefully revised editions of
the scores of Mozart's symphonies and operas, of
Beethoven's symphonies and overtures for Breit-
kopf & Hartel's complete edition, and by the
work he did for the Bach and German Handel
Societies. His editions of Handel's scores con
trast very favourably with those of some other
editors. An edition of Mendelssohn's complete
works closed his labours in this respect.
In 1860 the King of Saxony appointed him
Conductor of the Royal Opera and of the music
at the Roman Catholic Court-church at Dresden.
He also accepted the post of Artistic Director
of the Dresden Conservator! um. In 1876 the
title of General-Musikdirector was given to him.
The University of Leipzig had already in 1859
i See Mendelssohn's Letters, ii. p. 234 (Eng. ed,).
RIETZ.
133
conferred on him the honorary degree of Doctor
of Philosophy.
Rietz was for some time one of the most influ
ential musicians of Germany. He was a good
violoncellist, but soon after leaving Diisseldorf
he gave up playing entirely. As a composer he
showed a rare command of all the resources of the
orchestra and a complete mastery of all techni
calities of composition. Mendelssohn^ in his
friendly but candid criticism in the published
letter already referred to, says, ' There is some
thing so genuinely artistic and so genuinely
musical in your orchestral works'; and further
on, ' You understand how to give a really musical
interest to every second oboe or trumpet.' Indeed
some of his music, especially the two overtures
already mentioned, the Symphony in Eb, and
some of his choral works, has won general and
deserved success, mainly by the qualities Men
delssohn praises in them, and by a certain vigour
and straightforwardness of style. Yet we gather
clearly enough from Mendelssohn's friendly re
marks the reason why so few of Rietz's works
have shown any vitality. As a composer he can
hardly be said to show distinct individuality ;
his ideas are wanting in spontaneity, his themes
are generally somewhat dry, and their treatment
often rather diffuse and laboured. In fact Rietz
was an excellent musician, and a musical intellect
of the first rank — but not much of a poet. His
great reputation rested, first, on his talent for con
ducting, and secondly on his rare acquirements
as a musical scholar. An unfailing ear, imper
turbable presence of mind, and great personal
authority, made him one of the best conductors
of modern times. The combination of practi
cal musicianship with a natural inclination for
critical research and a pre-eminently intellectual
tendency of mind, made him a first-rate judge
on questions of musical scholarship. After
Mendelssohn and Schumann, Rietz has probably
done more than anybody else to purify the scores
of the great masters from the numerous errors
of text by which they were disfigured. He was
an absolute and uncompromising adherent of the
classical school, and had but little sympathy
with modern music after Mendelssohn 4 and even
in the works of Schubert, Schumann and Brahms
was over-apt to see the weak points. As to the
music of the newest German School, he held it in
abhorrence, and would show his aversion on every
occasion. He was, however, too much of an opera-
conductor not to feel a certain interest in Wagner,
and in preparing his operas would take a special
pride and relish in overcoming the great and pecu
liar difficulties contained in Wagner's scores.
Rietz had many personal friends, but, as will
appear natural with a man of so pronounced a
character and opinions, also a number of bitter
enemies. He died at Dresden Oct. i, 1877, leaving
a large and valuable musical library which was
sold by auction in Dec. 1877. Besides the works
already mentioned he published a considerable
number of compositions for the chamber, songs,
concertos for violin and for various wind-instru
ments. He also wrote a great Mass. [P-D.]
134
RIGADOON.
RIGADOON (French Rigadon or Rigaudon),
a lively dance, which most probably came from
Provence or Languedoc, although its popularity
in England has caused some writers to suppose
that it is of English origin. It was danced
in France in the time of Louis XIII, but does
not seem to have become popular in England
until the end of the i7th century. According
to Rousseau it derived its name from its inventor,
one Rigaud, but others connect it with the
English ' rig,' i. e. wanton, or lively.
The Rigadoon was remarkable for a peculiar
jumping step (which is described at length in
Compan's ' Dictionnaire de la Danse,' Paris,
1802); this step survived the dance for some
time. The music of the Rigadoon is in 2-4 or C
time, and consists of three or four parts, of which
the third is quite short. The number of bars is
unequal, and the music generally begins on the
third or fourth beat of the bar. The follow
ing example is from the 3rd Part of Henry
Playford's 'Apollo's Banquet' (6th edition,
1690). The same tune occurs in ' The Dancing
Master,' but in that work the bars are incor
rectly divided.
« 4f-fr££££
F*
[W.B.S.]
RIGBY, GEORGE VERNON, born Jan. 21, 1840,
when about 9 years old was a chorister of St. Chad's
Cathedral, Birmingham, where he remained for
about 7 years. In 1860, his voice having changed
to a tenor, he decided upon becoming a singer,
and tried his strength at some minor concerts in
Birmingham and its neighbourhood, and succeeded
so well that in 1861 he removed to London, and
on March 4 appeared at the Alhambra, Leicester
Square (then a concert room, managed by E. T.
Smith), and in August following at Mellon's
Promenade Concerts at Covent Garden. In 1865
he sang in the provinces as a member of H. Corri's
Opera Company, until November, when he went
to Italy and studied under San Giovanni at Milan,
where in Nov. 1866 he appeared at the Carcano
Theatre as the Fisherman in Rossini's ' Guglielmo
Tell.' He next went to Berlin, and in Jan. 1867
appeared at the Victoria Theatre there, in the
principal tenor parts in 'Don Pasquale,' 'La
Sonnambula,' and ' L'ltaliana in Algieri.' He
then accepted a three months engagement in Den
mark, and performed 11 Conte Almaviva in the
RIGHINI.
'Barbiere,' II Duca in 'Rigoletto,' and other
parts, in Copenhagen and other towns. He re
turned to England in Sept. 1867, and sang at
various places. In 1868 he was engaged at the
Gloucester Festival with Sims Reeves, whose
temporary indisposition afforded him the oppor
tunity of singing the part of Samson in Handel's
oratorio, in which he acquitted himself so ably
that he was immediately engaged by the Sacred
Harmonic Society, where he appeared, Nov. 27,
1868, with signal success, and immediately es
tablished himself as an oratorio singer. In 1869
he appeared on the stage of the Princess's
Theatre as Acis in Handel's 'Acis and
Galatea.5 He has since maintained a prominent
position at all the principal concerts and festivals
in town and country. His voice is of fine quality,
full compass, and considerable power, and he
sings with earnestness and care. [W.H.H.]
RIGHINI, VINCENZO, a well-known conductor
of the Italian opera in Berlin, born at Bologna
Jan. 22, 1756. As a boy he had a fine voice,
but owing to injury it developed into a tenor
of so rough and muffled a tone, that he turned
his attention to theory, which he studied with
Padre Martini. In 1776 he sang for a short
time in the Opera buffa at Prague, then under
Bustelli's direction, but was not well received.
He made a success there however with three
operas of his composition, ' La Vedova scaltra,'
'La Bottega del Caffe,' and 'Don Giovanni,'
also performed in Vienna (Aug. 1777), whither
Righini went on leaving Prague. There he be
came singing-master to Princess Elisabeth of
Wiirtemberg, and conductor of the Italian opera.
He next entered the service of the Elector
of Mayence, and composed for the Elector of
Treves ' Alcide al Bivio ' (Coblenz) and a mass.
In April 1 793 he was invited to succeed Ales-
sandri at the Italian Opera of Berlin, with a
salary of 3000 thalers (about £450). Here
he produced ' Enea nel Lazio ' and ' II Trionfo
d'Arianna (1793), ' Armida ' (1799), 'Tigrane'
(1800), 'Gerusalemme liberata,' and 'La Selva
incantata3 (1803). The last two were pub
lished after his death with German text (Leipzig,
Herklotz).
In 1794 Righini married Henriette Kneisel
(born at Stettin in 1767, died of consumption at
Berlin Jan. 25, 1801), a charming blonde, and,
according to Gerber, a singer of great expression.
After the death of Friedrich Wilhelm II. (179?)
his post became almost a sinecure, and in 1806
the opera was entirely discontinued. Eighini
was much beloved. Gerber speaks in high terms
of his modesty and courtesy, and adds, ' It
is a real enjoyment to hear him sing his own
pieces in his soft veiled voice to his own ac
companiment.' As a composer he was not of
the first rank, and of course was eclipsed by
Mozart. His best point was his feeling fur
ensemble, of which the quartet in ' Gerusalemme '
is a good example. He was a successful teacher
of singing, and counted distinguished artists
among his pupils. After the loss of a promising
son in 1810, his health gave way, and in 1812 he
RIGHINI.
was ordered to try the effects of his native air at
Bologna. When bidding goodbye to his colleague,
Anselm Weber, he said, ' It is my belief that I
shall never return; if it should be so, sing a
Requiem and a Miserere for me ' — touching words
too soon fulfilled by his death at Bologna, Aug.
19, 1812. His own Requiem (score in the Berlin
Library), was performed by the Singakademie in
his honour.
Besides 20 operas, of which a list is given by
Fe'tis, Righini composed church music — a Te
Deum and a Missa Solennis are published and still
known in Germany — several cantatas, and innu
merable Scenas, Lieder, and songs; also a short
ballet, ' Minerva belebt die Statuen des Dadalus,'
and some instrumental pieces, including a sere
nade for 2 clarinets, 2 horns, and 2 bassoons
(i799,Breitkopf & Hartel). One of his operas,
'II Convitato di pietra, osia il dissoluto,' will
always be interesting as a forerunner of Mozart's
'Don Giovanni.' It was produced at Vienna,
Aug. 21, 1777 (ten years before Mozart's), and
is described by Jahn (Mozart, ii. 333). His
best orchestral work is his overture to 'Tigranes,'
which is still occasionally played in Germany
and England. Breitkopf & Hartel's Catalogue
shows a tolerably long list of his songs, and
his exercises for the voice (1804) are amongst
the best that exist. English amateurs will
find a duet of his, ' Come opprima,' from ' Enea
nel Lazio,' in the 'Musical Library,' vol. i.
p. 8, and two airs in Lonsdale's ' Gemme d' Anti-
chita.' He was one of the 63 composers who
set the words 'In questa tomba oscura,' and
his setting was published in 1878 by Ritter of
Magdeburg. [F.G.]
RIGOLETTO. An opera in 3 acts ; libretto
by Piave (founded on V. Hugo's ' Le Roi
sn amuse'), music by Verdi. Produced at the
Teatro Fenice, Venice, March n, 1851, and
given in Italian at Covent Garden, May 14, 1853,
and at the Italiens, Paris, Jan. 19, 1857. [G.]
RIMBAULT, EDWARD FRANCIS, LL.D, son
of Stephen Francis Rimbault, organist of St.
Giles in the Fields, was born in Soho, June 13,
1816. He received his first instruction in music
from his father, but afterwards became a pupil
of Samuel Wesley. At 16 years old he was
appointed organist of the Swiss Church, Soho.
He early directed his attention to the study
of musical history and literature, and in 1838
delivered a series of lectures on the history of
music in England. In 1840 he took an active
part in the formation of the Musical Antiquarian
and Percy Societies, of both which he became
secretary, and for both which he edited several
works. In 1841 he was editor of the musical pub
lications of the Motett Society. In the course
of the next few years he edited a collection of
Cathedral Chants ; The Order of Daily Service
according to the use of Westminster Abbey ; a
reprint of Low's Brief Direction for the per
formance of Cathedral Service; Tallis's Re
sponses; Merbeck's Book of Common Prayer,
noted ; a volume of unpublished Cathedral
Services; Arnold's Cathedral Music ; andtheora-
RINFORZANDO.
135
torios of ' Messiah,' ' Samson,' and ' Saul,' for the
Handel Society. In 1842 he was elected an
F.S.A. and member of the Academy of Music
in Stockholm, and obtained the degree of Doctor
in Philosophy. He was offered, but declined,
the appointment of Professor of Music in Har
vard University, U. S. A. In 1848 he received
the honorary degree of LL. D. He lectured on
music at the Collegiate Institution, Liverpool ;
the Philosophic Institute, Edinburgh ; the Royal
Institution of Great Britain, and elsewhere. He
published ' The History and Construction of the
Organ ' (in collaboration with Mr. E. J. Hopkins),
' Notices of the Early English Organ Builders^ ;
'History of the Pianoforte,' 'Bibliotheca Mad-
rigaliana,' ' Musical Illustrations of Percy's
Reliques,' ' The Ancient Vocal Music of England,'
'The Rounds, Catches and Canons of England'
(in conjunction with Rev. J. P. Metcalfe), two
collections of Christmas Carols, * A Little Book
of Songs and Ballads,' etc., etc. He edited North's
' Memoirs of Musick,' Sir Thomas Overbury's
Works, the Old Cheque Book of the Chapel
Royal, and two Sermons by Boy Bishops. He ar
ranged many operas and other works, was author
of many elementary books, and an extensive
contributor to periodical literature. His com
positions were but few, the principal being an
operetta, 'The Fair Maid of Islington,' 1838,
and a posthumous cantata, 'Country Life.' His
pretty little song, 'Happy land,' had an extensive
popularity. After his resignation of the organist-
ship of the Swiss Church, he was successively
organist of several churches and chapels. He
died, after a lingering illness, Sept. 26, 1876,
leaving a fine musical library, which was sold
by auction. [W.H.H.]
RINALDO. Handel's first opera in England;
composed in a fortnight, and produced at the
King's Theatre in the Haymarket Feb. 24, 1711.
The libretto was founded on the episode of
Rinaldo and Armida in Tasso's ' Jerusalem De
livered ' (the same on which Gluck based his
'Armida'). Rossi wrote it in Italian, and it was
translated into English by Aaron Hill. The
opera was mounted with extraordinary magnifi
cence, and had an uninterrupted run of 1 5 nights
— at that time unusually long. The march, and
the air ' II tricerbero,' were long popular as ' Let
us take the road' (Beggar's Opera), and 'Let the
waiter bring clean glasses.' ' Lascia ch'io pianga '
— made out of a saraband in Handel's earlier
opera ' Almira' (1704) — is still a favourite with
singers and hearers. [G.]
RINFORZANDO, ' reinforcing ' or increasing
in power. This word, or its abbreviations, rinf.
or rfz. is used to denote a sudden and short-lasting
crescendo. It is applied generally to a whole
phrase however short, and has the same meaning
as sforzando, which is only applied to single notes.
It is sometimes used in concerted music to give a
momentary prominence to a subordinate part, as
for instance in the Beethoven Quartet, op. 95, in
the Allegretto, where the violoncello part is
marked rinforzando, when it has the second
136
RINFORZANDO.
section of the principal subject of the move
ment. [J.A.F.M.]
RINK or RINCK, JOHANN CHRISTIAN HEIN-
BICH, the celebrated organist and composer for
his instrument, born at Elgersburg in Saxe-Gotha,
Feb. 1 8, 1770, and died at Darmstadt, Aug. 7,
1846. His talent developed itself at an early
period, and, like JOHANN SCHNEIDER [see that
name], he had the advantage of a direct tradi
tional reading of the works of Sebastian Bach,
having studied at Erfurt under Kittel, one of
the great composer's best pupils. Rink having sat
at the feet of Forkel at the University of Gottin-
gen, obtained in 1 789 the organistship of Giessen,
where he held several other musical appointments.
In 1806 he became organist at Darmstadt, and
'professor' at its college; in 1813 was appointed
Court organist, and in 1817 chamber musician
to the Grand Duke (Ludwig I). Rink made
several artistic tours in Germany, his playing
always eliciting much admiration. At Treves, in
1827, he was greeted with special honour. He
received various decorations, — in 1831 member
ship of the Dutch Society for Encouragement
of Music ; in 1838 the cross of the first class
from his Grand Duke ; in 1840 ' Doctor of Philo
sophy and Arts ' from the University of Giesseu.
Out of his 125 works a few are for chamber,
including sonatas for PF., violin, and violoncello,
and PF. duets. But his reputation is based
on his organ music, or rather on his ' Practical
Organ School,' a standard work. Rink's compo
sitions for his instrument show no trace of such
sublime influence as might have been looked for
from a pupil, in the second generation, of Bach ;
indeed throughout them fugue-writing is con
spicuous by its absence. But without attaining
the high standard which has been reached by
living composers for the instrument in Ger
many, his organ-pieces contain much that is
interesting to an organ student, and never de
generate into the debased and flippant style of
the French or English organ-music so prevalent
at present.
Rink's name will always live as that of an
executant, and of a safe guide towards the form
ation of a, sound and practical organ-player ;
and his works comprise many artistic studies.
Amongst these the more important are the
'Practical Organ School,' in six divisions (op.
55), and 'Preludes for Chorales,' issued at vari
ous periods. He also composed for the church
a 'Pater Noster' for four voices with organ
(op. 59) ; motets, ' Praise the Lord' (op. 88)
and 'God be merciful' (op. 109); 12 chorales for
men's voices, etc. [H.S.O.]
RIOTTE, PHILIPP JACOB, born at St. Mendel,
Treves, Aug. 16, 1776. Andre of Offenbach was
his teacher in music, and he made his first
appearance at Frankfort in Feb. 1 804. In 1 806
he was music-director at Gotha. In 1808 he
conducted the French operas before the assembled
royalties at the Congress of Erfurt. In April
1809 his operetta 'Das Grenzstadtchen ' was
produced at the Karnthnerthor Theatre, Vienna,
and thenceforward Vienna was his residence. In
RISPOSTA.
1818 he became eonductor at the Theatre an-
der-Wien, beyond which he does not seem to
have advanced up to his death, Aug. 20. 1856.
The list of his theatrical works is immense.
His biography in Wurzbach's Lexicon enumer
ates, between 1809 and 1848, no less than 48
pieces, operas, operettas, ballets, pantomimes,
music to plays, etc., written mostly by himself, and
sometimes in conjunction with others. In 1852
he wound up his long labours by a cantata ' The
Crusade,' which was performed in the great
Redoutensaal, Vienna, with much applause. In
other notices he is said to have produced an
opera called 'Mozart's Zauberflote' at Prague
about 1820. He left also a symphony (op. 25),
9 solo-sonatas, 6 do. for PF. and violin, 3 con
certos for clarinet and orchestra, but these are
defunct. He became very popular by a piece
called ' The Battle of Leipzig,' for PF. solo, which
was republished over half Germany, and had a
prodigious sale.
In a letter to the Archduke Rudolph (Thayer,
iii. 195), Beethoven mentions that the fineness of
the day and his going in the evening to ' Wanda'
at the theatre had prevented his attending to
some wish of the Archduke's. ' Wanda, Queen of
the Samartians' was a tragedy of Z. Werner's,
with music by Riotte, played from March 16 to
April 20, 1812. [G.]
RIPIENO, 'supplementary.' The name given
to the accompanying instruments in the orches
tras, and especially in the orchestral concertos of
the 1 7th and i8th centuries, which were only
employed to fill in the harmonies and to support
the solo or ' concertante ' parts. [See CONCER-
TANTE, vol. i. p. 3856.] [J.A.F.M.]
RISELEY, GEORGE, born at Bristol, Aug. 28,
1 845 ; elected chorister of Bristol Cathedral in
1852, and in Jan. 1862 articled to Mr. John Davis
Corfe, the Cathedral organist, for instruction in
the organ, pianoforte, harmony, and counterpoint.
During the next ten years he was organist at
various churches in Bristol and Clifton, at the
same time acting as deputy at the Cathedral. In
1870 he was appointed organist to the Colston
Hall, Bristol, where he started weekly recitals of
classical and popular music, and in 1876 suc
ceeded Mr. Corfe as organist to the Cathedral.
During the last five years, Mr. Riseley has
devoted his energies to the improvement of
orchestral music in Bristol, where he has now
collected an excellent orchestra of fifty players.
In 1877 he started his orchestral concerts, which
have won for him a well- deserved reputation.
Notwithstanding considerable opposition, and^no
small pecuniary risk, he has continued, during
each season, to give fortnightly concerts, at which
the principal works of the classical masters have
been well performed, and a large number of
interesting novelties by modern writers, both
English and foreign, produced. [W.B.S.]
RISPOSTA (Lat. Comes; Eng. Answer). The
Answer to the Subject of a Fugue, or Point of
Imitation. [See PROPOSTA.]
In Real Fugue, the Answer imitates the
EISPOSTA.
Subject, Interval for Interval. In Tonal Fugue
the Tonic is always answered by the Dominant,
and vice versa. In both, the Imitation is usually
conducted, either in the Fifth above the Proposta,
or the Fourth below it, when the Subject begins
upon the Tonic ; and, in the Fourth above, or
the Fifth below, when it begins upon the Domi
nant. [See FUGUE, REAL FUGUE, TONAL FUGUE,
SUBJECT.] [W.S.R."
RITARDANDO ; RITENENTE ; RITEN-
UTO. [See RALLENTANDO.]
RITORNELLO (Abbrev. Eitornel, Eitor.
Fr. Ritournelle). I. An Italian word, literally
signifying, a little return, or repetition ; but
more frequently applied, in a conventional sense,
(1) to a short Instrumental Melody, played
between the Scenes of an Opera, or even during
their action, either for the purpose of enforcing
some particular dramatic effect, or of amusing
the audience during the time occupied in the
preparation of some elaborate 'Set-Scene'; or,
(2) to the symphonies introduced between the
vocal phrases of a Song, or Anthem.
i . The earliest known use of the term, in its
first sense, is to be found in Peri's ' Euridice,'
in connexion with a melody for 3 flutes, which,
though called a ' Zinfonia' on its first appear
ance, is afterwards repeated under the title of
' Ritornello.1 ' Euridice ' was first printed at
Florence in 1600, and at Venice in 1608. [For
the Zinfonia, see vol. ii. of this Dictionary, p.
499-1 .
A similar use of the term occurs soon after
wards in Monteverde's ' Orfeo,' printed at Venice
in 1609, and republished in 1615. In this work,
the Overture — there called Toccata — is followed
by a ' Ritornello' in 5 parts, the rhythmic form
of which is immeasurably in advance of the age
in which it was produced.
RITTER.
137
I is
^*=&E^
rLKTTfr
p
±A
t-t
•^
f^
A4JJ.
rr
5ff
i
ft
£FPFF
fT=f
it
33
J— «L
* At this mark, the two upper Parts cross, and remain inverted,
until the sign 0.
2. When Vocal Music with Instrumental Ac
companiment became more extensively culti
vated, the word was brought into common use, in
its second sense, as applied to the Instrumental
Symphonies of a Song, or other Composition for
a Solo Voice. Ritornelli of this kind were freely
used by Cavalli, Cesti, Carissirni, and many other
Composers of the early Venetian Dramatic School,
who imitated their manner. An example from
Cavalli's ' II Giasone,' will be found at page 503
of our second volume. Towards the close of the
1 7th century such instrumental interpolations
became very common, in all styles and countries.
For instance, in early editions of the Verse
Anthems of Croft, Greene, and other English
Composers, of the iyth and i8th centuries, we
constantly find the words ' Ritornel.', ' Ritor.', or
' Rit.', printed over little Interludes, which, un
known in the more severe kind of Ecclesiastical
Music, formed a marked feature in works of this
particular School, frequently embodying some of
its choicest scraps of Melody, as in Dr. Boyce's
Anthem, 'The Heavens declare the glory of
God':—
Organ
^
j=.
S
r— t— t
^=F^
"^T
—& — 7^
^l i
* •*
. L — [
t-
— • —
=t=±
-1-
T
In later editions the term disappears, its place
being supplied, in the same passages, by the
words ' Organ,' or ' Sym.' ; which last abbre
viation is almost invariably found in old copies
of Handel's Songs, and other similar Music, in
which the Symphonies are interpolated, as often
as opportunity permits, upon the line allotted to
the Voice.
IL An antient form of Italian Verse, in which
each Strophe consists of three lines, the first and
third of which rhyme with each other, after the
manner of the Terza rima of Dante. Little Folk-
Songs of this character are still popular, under
the name of 'Ritornelli' or ' Stornelli/ among
the peasants of the Abruzzi and other mountain
regions of Italy. [W. S. R.]
RITTER, FKEDERIO Louis, born at Strasburg,
1834. His paternal ancestors were Spanish, and
the family name was originally Caballero. His
musical studies were begun at an early age under
Hauser and Schletterer, and continued at Paris
(whither he was sent when 16 years of age) under
the supervision of his cousin, Georges Kastner.
Possessed with the idea that beyond the Rhine
he would find better opportunities for the study
of composition, he ran away to Germany, where
be remained for two years, assiduously pursuing
bis studies with eminent musicians, and attending
concerts whenever good music could be heard.
Returning to Lorraine, aged 1 8, he was nominated
Drofessor of music in the Protestant seminary of
Fenestrange, and invited to conduct a Socie"t£ de
133
HITTER.
Concerts at Bordeaux. The representations made
by some of his family who had settled in America
induced him to visit the New World. He spent
a few years in Cincinnati, where his enthusiasm
worked wonders in the development of taste. The
Cecilia (choral) and Philharmonic (orchestral)
Societies were established by him, and a large
number of important works presented at their
concerts for the first time in the United States.
In 1862 Hitter went to New York, becoming
conductor of the Sacred Harmonic Society for
seven years, and of the Arion Choral Society
(male voices), and instituting (1867) the first
musical festival held in that city. In 1867 he
was appointed director of the musical department
of Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, whither he re
moved in 1874 on resigning his conductorships.
The University of the City of New York con
ferred on him the degree of Doctor of Music in
1878. He still retains (1881) the directorship of
the musical studies ab Vassar College. Hitter's
literary labours have included articles on musical
topics printed in French, German and American
periodicals. His most important work is ' A
History of Music, in the Form of Lectures' —
vol. i. 1870 ; vol. ii. 1874, Boston J both repub-
lished by W. Keeves, London, 1876; vol. iii. is
in preparation. As a composer, Hitter may be
classed with the modern Franco-German school.
The following works have appeared in the
catalogues of Hamburg, Leipzig, Mayence and
New York publishers : —
Op. 1. 'Hafis,' cyclus of Persian
songs.
2. Preambule Scherzo, PF.
3. 10 children's songs.
4. Fairy Love.
5. 8 PF. pieces.
6. 6 songs.
7. 5 choruses, male voices.
8. Psalm xxiii, female voices.
Op. 10. 6 songs. 10 Irish Melodies,
with new PF. acct.
11. Organ fantasia and fugue.
12. Voices of the Night, PF.
' 0 Salutaris,' baritone, organ.
' Ave Maria,' mezzo-sopr., organ.
' Parting,' song, mezzo-soprano.
A Practical Method for the In
struction of Chorus-classes.
The following are his most important un
published compositions : —
3 Symphonies— A, E minor, E b.
' Stella,' Poeme-symphonique,
d'apres V. Hugo.
Overture, ' Othello.'
Concerto, PF. and orch.
Fantasia, bass clarinet and orch.
1 string quartet ; 3 do.
Psalm xlvi, solo, chor. and orch.
All of the above were produced at the concerts
of the New York and Brooklyn Philharmonic
Societies, 1867-1876.
Dr. Hitter's wife, n£e Raymond, is known
under the name of FANNY RAYMOND HITTEK as
an author and translator of works on musical
subjects. She has brought out translations of
Ehlert's 'Letters on Music, to a Lady'; and of
Schumann's Essays and Criticisms — ' Music and
Musicians ' ; and a pamphlet entitled ' Women
as a Musician ' — all published by Reeves,
London. [F.H.J.]
ROBERT BRUCE. A pasticcio adapted by
Niedermeyer from four of Rossini's operas —
'Zelmira,' the 'Donna del Lago,' 'Torvaldo e
Dorliska,' and 'Bianca e Faliero.' Produced
without success at the Academic Royale, Dec.
30, 1846. It is published in Italian as ' Roberto
Bruce ' by Ricordi. [G.]
ROBERT LE DIABLE. Opera in 5 acts;
words by Scribe, music by Meyerbeer. Pro-
HOBIN AD AIR.
duced at the Acade'mie, Paris, Nov. 21, 1831.
In London, and in English, imperfectly, as ' The
Demon, or the Mystic Branch ' at Drury Lane,
Feb. 20, 1832, and as 'The Fiend Father, or
Robert of Normandy' at Covent Garden the
day following ; as ' Robert the Devil ' at Drury
Lane (Bunn), March I, 1845. In French, at
Her Majesty's, June n, 1832, with Nourrit,
Levasseur, Damoreau. In Italian, at Her Ma
jesty's, May 4, 1847 (first appearance of Jenny
Lind and Staudigl — Mendelssohn was in the
house). [G.]
ROBERTO DEVEREUX, CONTE D'ES-
SEX. An opera in 3 acts ; libretto by Camerano
from Thomas Corneille's ' Comte d'Essex,' music
by Donizetti. Produced in Naples in 1836 ; at the
Italiens, Paris, Dec. 27, 1838 ; at Her Majesty's
Theatre, London, June 24, 1841. The overture
contains the air of ' God save the King.' [G.]
ROBERTS, J. VAKLEY, Mus. Doc., native of
Stanningley, near Leeds, born Sept. 25, 1841.
He exhibited much early ability for music, and
at twelve was appointed organist of S. John's,
Farsley, near Leeds. In 1862 he became organist
of S. Bartholomew's, Armley, and in 1868 re
ceived his present appointment of organist and
choirmaster of the parish church, Halifax, after
a competitive trial, Dr. E. G. Monk acting as
umpire. In 1871 he graduated Mus. Bac., and
in 1876 Mus. Doc., at Christ Church, Oxford.
During his organistship at Halifax, upwards of
£3000 have been raised to enlarge the organ,
originally built by Snetzler — the instrument
upon which Sir Wm. Herschel, the renowned
astronomer, formerly played — and it is now-
one of the finest and largest in the North of
England.
In 1876 Dr. Roberts became a Fellow in the
College of Organists, London. He has pub
lished a sacred cantata, ' Jonah/ for voices and
orchestra (Novello); an Appendix and a Sup
plement to Cheetham's Psalmody ; a Morning
Communion and Evening Service in D; an
Evening Service in F ; anthems, organ volun
taries, and songs. [G.]
ROBIN ADAIR or EILEEN AHOON. This
air first became popular in England in the second
half of the last century, through the eminent
Italian singer Tenducci. He was one of the
original singers in Arne's opera of ' Artaxerxes/
produced in 1762, and was afterwards engaged
by Dr. Arne to accompany him to Ireland, where
he probably learnt this song. It is certain that
he sang 'Eileen Aroon' in the Irish language,
the words being written out phonetically for him.
He sang also at Ranelagh Gardens, and an edi
tion with the Irish words ' sung by Signer Ten
ducci,' was published in London with music on
a half sheet. In Ireland he had drawn especial
attention to the air, and among the English-
speaking part of the population several songs of
local interest were written to it, making Robin
Adair the burthen. For these, which do not
in any way concern the tune, the curious are
referred to the indexes to the 3rd, 4th, and 5th
ROBIN ADAIE.
series of ' Notes and Queries.' It is here sufficient
to show by the correspondence between the poet
Burns and George Thomson, that the air was
known as 'Robin Adair' before Braham reintro-
duced it here. In the published correspondence
between Thomson the music publisher, for whom
Haydn and Beethoven both harmonized Scotch
airs, and Burns, Thomson, writing in August,
1793, says, 'I shall be glad to see you give
Robin Adair a Scottish dress. Peter [Pindar] is
furnishing him with an English suit for a change,
and you are well matched together. Robin's air
is excellent, though he certainly has an out-of-
the-way measure as ever poor Parnassian wight
was plagued with.' To this Burns answered in
the same month : ' I have tried my hand on
"Robin Adair," and, you will probably think
with little success ; but it is such a cursed, cramp,
out-of-the-way measure, that I despair of doing
anything better to it.' He then sends ' Phillis
the fair,' and, a few days later, writes again,
'That crinkum-crankum tune, " Robin Adair,"
has been running in my head, and I succeeded
so ill on my last attempt, that I have ventured,
in this morning's walk, one essay more.' He
then encloses ' Had I a cave.'
It is difficult to tell who wrote the words of
the present song of Robin Adair. The name of
the author is not upon the original title-page.
Peter Pindar's songs (Dr. John Wolcott's) are
not included in his collected works, being then
the copyright of Messrs Goulding & D'Al-
maine, who bought all for an annuity of £250,
and, as Peter was christened in 1738 and died
in 1819, it was a dear bargain. The popularity
of Robin Adair dates from Braham's benefit at
the Lyceum Theatre on December 17, 1811.
He then sang the air with great applause, but
as the vowels are long in ' Eileen,' and short in
'Robin,' he introduced the acciaccatura, which
Dr. Burney calls the ' Scotch snap.' The change
will be more intelligible in notes than in de
scription. Thus : —
ROBINSON.
139
3
g
Tuc-ee non von - ee tu, Ei - leen A - roon.
E
fl — £3-
fcpt
What 's this dull town to me, Bo - bin 's not near.
We give the line in its accurate translitera
tion, as kindly supplied by Dr. P. W. Joyce, the
eminent Irish collector : —
Tiocu-faidh n6'n bhfan faidh tu, Eibhlin a ruin ?
[W.C.]
ROBIN DES BOIS. The title of the French
version of ' Der Freischtitz ' at its first appear
ance in Paris (Ode~on, Dec. 7, 1824; Ope"ra
Comique, Jan. 15, 1835 ; Lyrique, Jan. 24, 1855).
The libretto was made by Sauvage ; the names
of the characters were changed, the action and
the story were altered, portions of ' Preciosa ' and
' Oberon ' were introduced, and the piece was
made to end happily. The alterations were due
to Castil Blaze, who to save expense scored the
music himself from a PF. copy. Nevertheless,
with all these drawbacks, so great was the popu
larity of the music that Castil Blaze made a large
sum of money by it. For the translation by Pacini
and Berlioz see FBEISCHUTZ, vol. i. p. 562. [G.]
ROBIN HOOD. An opera in 3 acts ; words
by John Oxenford, music by G. A. Macfarren.
Produced at Her Majesty's Theatre, London,
Oct. n, 1860, and had a very great run. [G.]
ROBINSON, ANASTASIA, was daughter of a
portrait painter, who, becoming blind, was com
pelled to qualify his children to gain their own
livelihood. Anastasia received instruction from
Dr. Croft, Pier Giuseppe Sandoni, and the singer
called The Baroness, successively. She appeared
as Ariana in Handel's 'Amadigi,' May 25, 1715;
and in 1720 at the King's Theatre as Echo in
Domenico Scarlatti's opera, ' Narcisso.' She
afterwards sang in the pasticcio of ' Muzio Scse-
vola.'in Handel's 'Ottone,' ' Floridante,' 'Flavio,'
and 'Giulio Cesare'; in Buononcini's 'Crispo'
and 'Griselda,' and other operas. Her salary was
£1000 for the season, besides a benefit-night. She
possessed a fine voice of extensive compass, but
her intonation was uncertain. She quitted the
stage in 1723, on being privately married to the
Earl of Peterborough, who did not avow the mar
riage until shortly before his death in 1735, al
though, according to one account, she resided
with him as mistress of the house, and was
received as such by the Earl's friends. Accord
ing to another account, she resided with her
mother in a house near Fulham, which the Earl
took for them, and never lived under the same
roof with him, until she attended him in a
journey in search of health, a short time before
his death. The Countess survived until 1750.
There is a fine portrait of her by Faber after
Vanderbank, 172 7-
Her younger sister, MARGARET, intended for a
miniature painter, preferred being a singer. She
studied under Buononcini, and afterwards at Paris
under Rameau ; but though an excellent singer,
was said to have been prevented by timidity from
ever appearing in public.1 A fortunate marriage,
however, relieved her from the necessity of ob
taining her own subsistence. [W. H. H.]
ROBINSON, JOHN, born 1682, was a chorister
of the Chapel Royal under Dr. Blow. He subse
quently became organist of St. Lawrence, Jewry,
and St. Magnus, London Bridge. Hawkins, in
his History, describes him as ' a very florid and
elegant performer on the organ, inasmuch that
crowds resorted to hear him ' ; and elsewhere
says : ' In parish churches the voluntary between
the Psalms and the First Lesson was anciently a
slow, solemn movement, tending to compose the
minds and excite sentiments of piety and devo
tion. Mr. Robinson introduced a different prac
tice, calculated to display the agility of his fingers
in allegro movements on the cornet, trumpet,
l A 'Miss Rohinson, jun.,' appeared at Drury Lane, Jan. 2, 1729, as
Ariel in ' The Tempest.' It is possible that this was Margaret Eobin-
son.
140
ROBINSON.
sesquialtera, and other noisy stops, degrading the
instrument, and instead of the full and noble
harmony with which it was designed to gratify
the ear, tickling it with mere airs in two parts,
in fact solos for a flute and a bass.' On Sept. 30,
1727, Robinson was appointed to succeed Dr.
Croft as organist of Westminster Abbey. He
had an extensive practice as a teacher of the
harpsichord, and will be long remembered in the
English Church by his double chant in Eb. He
died April 30, 1762, and was buried, May 13, in
the north aisle of Westminster Abbey. He
married, Sept. 6, 1716, Ann, youngest daughter
of William Turner, Mus. Doc. She was a singer,
and appeared at the King's Theatre in 1720 in
Domenico Scarlatti's opera 'Narcissus,' being de
scribed as ' Mrs. Turner-Bobinson ' to distinguish
her from Anastasia Robinson, who sang in the
same opera. She died Jan. 5, and was buried
Jan. 8, 174!) in the west cloister of Westminster
Abbey. Robinson had a daughter, who was a
contralto singer and the original representative of
Daniel in Handel's oratorio ' Belshazzar,' 1745,
and also sang in others of his oratorios. [W.H.H.]
ROBINSON, JOSEPH, was the youngest of
four brothers, born and resident in Dublin.
Their father Francis was an eminent professor
of music, and in 1810 was mainly instrumental
in founding 'the Sons of Handel,' probably the
earliest society established there for the execution
of large works. His son Francis, Mus. Doc.,
had a tenor voice of great beauty and sympathetic
quality ; was a vicar-choral of the two Dublin
Cathedrals ; and, at the Musical Festival in
Westminster Abbey, in June 1834, sang a prin
cipal part. Another son, William, had a deep
bass of exceptional volume; while John, the
organist of both Cathedrals and of Trinity Col
lege, had a tenor ranging to the high D. The
four brothers formed an admirable vocal quartet,
and were the first to make known the German
Part-songs then rarely heard either in England
or Ireland.
JOSEPH ROBINSON — born in Aug. 1816 — was
a chorister of St. Patrick's at the early age of
eight, and afterwards a member of all the choirs,
where his fine delivery of recitative was always
a striking feature. He also played in the
orchestra of the Dublin Philharmonic. But it
is as a conductor that his reputation is best
established. In 1834 he founded the 'Antient
Society,' of which he was conductor for 29 years,
and which ceased to exist soon after his resigna
tion. It commenced its meetings in a private
house, then took a large room, now the Royal
Irish Academy of Antiquities, and in 1843 had
made such progress that it purchased and re
modelled the building since known as the 'Antient
Concert Rooms.' Many of the standard works of
the old masters were produced, but thos&of modern
genius were not excluded. Thus Mendelssohn's
' Elijah ' was performed in 1 847, the year after its
first production at Birmingham. The ' Hymn of
Praise,' ' The Sons of Art,' and ' St. Paul ' were all
given at early dates. The society was not large ;
rather a, choir than a chorus ; but it was the first ,
ROBINSON.
to teach the Dublin public what beauty could be
developed in the execution of a work, by attention
to the conductor's baton, with every gradation
of effect. Amongst the last things written by
Mendelssohn was the instrumentation of his
' Hear my Prayer ' (originally composed for
voices and organ only), expressly for Mr.
Robinson to produce at the ' Antients.' It did
not reach him till after the composer's death.
[See MENDELSSOHN, vol. ii. 2836.] In 1837116
became conductor of the ' University Choral So
ciety,' founded by the students. At one of its
concerts the music of 'Antigone' was given for
the first time out of Germany. He continued to
conduct the Society for 10 years, and it still
flourishes under Sir Robert Stewart.
In 1849 a y°uno pianiste, Miss FANNY
ARTHUR (born Sept. 1831), arrived in Dublin
from Southampton, and made her first successful
appearance there — Feb. 19, 1849. Mr. Robinson
and she were married July 17 following, and
she continued for 30 years to be an extraordinary
favourite. Her first appearance in London was
at the Musical Union, June 26, 1855, when she
played Beethoven's Sonata in F (op. 24), with
Ernst, and received the praises of Meyerbeer ;
also at the New Philharmonic, where she played
Mendelssohn's Concerto in D. In 1852, at the
opening of the Cork Exhibition, Mr. Robinson
conducted the music, which was on a large
scale, and included a new cantata by Sir Robert
Stewart. In 1853, an International Exhibi
tion was opened in Dublin ; there he assembled
1000 performers, the largest band and chorus
yet brought together in Ireland, and produced
a fine effect.
In 1856 efforts were made to revive the
'Irish Academy of Music,' founded in 1848, but
languishing for want of funds and pupils. Mr.
and Mrs. Robinson joined as Professors, and
created Vocal and Pianoforte Schools of great
excellence. Nearly all the Irish artists, in both
lines, who appeared during their tune, owed both
training and success to their teaching ; and when,
after 20 years, Mr. Robinson resigned, the In
stitution was one of importance and stability.
In 1859, f°r the Handel Centenary, he gave
the ' Messiah,' with Jenny Lind and Belletti
among the principals. The net receipts amounted
to £900, an unprecedented sum in Dublin. In
1865 the large Exhibition Palace was opened
by the Prince of Wales, and Mr. Robinson con
ducted the performance with a band and chorus
of 700.
After the cessation of the 'Antients,' there was
no society to attempt systematically the worthy
production of great works. To remedy this a
chorus was trained by Mr. Robinson, and estab
lished in 1876 as the 'Dublin Musical Society.'
It gives three concerts each year, with 300 per
formers. It produces great choral works, new
and old, is attracting a regular audience, and is
steadily educating the public to a higher tone.
Some time since, the members presented Mr.
Robinson with an address and a purse of 100
sovereigns. The purse was returned by him with
ROBINSON.
ROCHLITZ.
141
warm expressions of gratitude, but with the cha
racteristic words ' While I think a professional
man should expect his fair remuneration, yet his
chief object may be something higher and nobler
— the advancement of art in his native city.'
He has written a variety of songs, concerted
pieces and anthems, beside arranging a number
of standard songs and Irish melodies.
Mrs. Robinson also passed a very active musi
cal life, though often interrupted by nervous ill
ness. In teaching she had a peculiar power of
infusing her own ideas into others. She played
from time to time at concerts of a high class,
and herself gave a very successful concert in
Paris, at the Salle Erard (Feb. 4, 1864). Her
pianoforte compositions are numerous and
graceful. Her sacred cantata, ' God is Love,' has
been repeatedly performed throughout the king
dom, and has realised for charities about £1000.
On Oct. 31, 1879, she met a sudden and tragic
end, which caused profound regret. On her
tomb is inscribed the motivo of the Chorus of
Angels from her own Cantata : —
^s
II
Rest in the Lord, Blessed in the Lord.
[H.M.D.]
ROBINSON, THOMAS, was author of a curious
work published at London in folio in 1603, bear
ing the following title — ' The Schoole of Musicke:
wherein is taught the perfect method of the true
fingering of the Lute, Pandora, Orpharion, and
Viol de Gamba; with most infallible general
rules both easie and delightfull. Also, a method,
how you may be your own instructer for Prick-
song by the help of your Lute without any other
teacher; with lessons of all sorts for your further
and better instruction.' Nothing is known of his
biography. [W.H.H.]
ROCHE, EDWARD, born at Calais Feb. 20,
1828, died at Paris Dec. 16, 1861, began life as
a violin player, first as Habeneck's pupil at the
Conservatoire, but quickly relinquished music
for literature. Roche translated the libretto of
Tannhauser under the eyes of Wagner himself,
for its representation at the Ope"ra, March 13,
1 86 1, and in a preface to his 'Poe'sies post-
humes' (Paris, Le>y, 1863) M. Sardou has
described the terrible persistence with which
Wagner kept his translator to his task. (See the
article in Pougin's supplement to Fe'tis.) The
opera failed, and Roche's labour was in vain ; he
had not even the satisfaction of seeing his name
in print, in connexion with the work, for even
Lajarte (Bibl. Mus. de 1'Opera, ii. 230) gives
Nuitter as the author of the French words.
Besides the poems contained in the volume cited,
Roche contributed critical articles to several
small periodicals. [G.]
ROCHLITZ, FRTEDRICH JOHANN, critic, and
founder of the ' Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung,'
born of poor parents at Leipzig, Feb. 12,1 769. His
fine voice procured his admission at 13 to the St.
Thomas-school, under the Cantorship of Doles,
where he spent six years and a half. He began to
study theology in the University, but want of
means compelled him to leave and take a tutor
ship, which he supplemented by writing. He also
attempted composition, and produced a mass, a
Te Deum, and a cantata, ' Die Vollendung des
Erlb'sers.' In 1/98 he founded the * Allgemeine
musikalische Zeitung' (Breitkopf & Hartel),
and edited it till 1818, during which period his
articles largely contributed totheimproved general
appreciation of the works of the three great
Austrian composers, Haydn, Mozart, and Bee
thoven, in North Germany. The best of these
were afterwards re-published by himself under
the title of 'Fur Freunde der Tonkunst' —
for friends of music — in 4 vols. (1824 to 1832,
reprinted later by Dorffel). It contains, amongst
other matter, an interesting account of a visit
to Beethoven at Vienna in 1822. Another im
portant work was a collection in 3 vols. (Schott,
1838 to 1840) of vocal music, from Dufay to
Haydn, in chronological order, of which the con
tents are given below. The first two volumes
of the A. M. Z. contain a series of anecdotes on
Mozart, whose acquaintance he made during
Mozart's visit to Leipzig ; but Jahn, in the pre
face to his 'Mozart,' has completely destroyed the
value of these as truthful records. — Rochlitz was
a good connoisseur of paintings and engravings.
In 1830 he was one of the committee appointed
by the Council of Leipzig to draw up a new
hymn-book, and some of the hymns are from his
own pen. He also wrote the librettos for Schicht's
' Ende des Gerechten, ' Spohr's ' Last Judgment '
and ' Calvary,' and for Bierey's opera ' Das Blu-
menmadchen. ' He was a Hofrath of Saxony, and
died Dec. 16, 1842. [F. G.]
The following are the contents of the collec
tion mentioned above — ' Sammlung vorzuglicher
Gesangstiicke vom Ursprung gesetzmassiger Har-
monie bis auf die neue Zeit ' (Important Pieces
from the origin of regular Harmony to modern
times).
FIRST PERIOD (1380-1550).
1. Dufay. Kyrie, a 4. Se la face 9. O. Lasso. Angelas pastores, a 5.
ay pale.
Do. Kyrie, &
arme1.'
4. ' L'omme
3. Ockeghem. Kyrie and Christe,
a 4.
4. Josquin de Pres. Hymnus, a 4.
Tu pauperum refugium.
6. Do. Zwischengesang einer der
grOssten Messen des Meisters,
et Incarnatus, a 4,
6. Do. Motet, Misericordias Do
mini, a 4.
7. 0. Lasso. Regina Cceli, a 4.
8. Do. Salve Regina, a 4.
10. Do. Miserere, Amplius, Cor
mundum, Ne proficeas, Redde
mihi, etc., a 5.
11. C. Goudimel. Domine quid
multiplicati, a 4.
12. Ch. de Morales. Kyrie et Christe,
a4.
Do. Gloria.
14. T. Tallis. Verba mea, a 4.
15. L. Send. Motet on a Choral,
' Mag ich ungluck,' a 4.
16. Do. Deus propitius esto, a 5.
17. Do. Nunc dimittis, a 4.
SECOND PERIOD (1550-1630).
DO.
Do.
Falestrina. Adoramus, a 4.
Do. Gloria, 2 choirs, a 4.
Pleni sunt, a 3.
O bone Jesu, a 4.
Do. Populemeus, 2 choirs, a 4.
Do. Madrigal, ' Cedro gentil,'
a 5.
Do. Lauda anima mea, a 4.
G. M.Nanini. Stabat mater, a 4.
Do. Exaudi nos, a 4.
Do. Hsec dies, a 5.
Vittoria. Jesu dulcis, a 4.
Do. O quam gloriosum, a 4.
F. Anerio. Adoramus, a 4.
Do. Christus factus est, a 4.
Allegri. Miserere, 2 choirs, a 5.
16. Gabrieli. In excelsis. Soprano
solo. Tenor solo and chorus,
a 4, with 3 horns, 2 trombones
and violins.
17. Do. Benedictus, 3 choirs, a 4.
18. BOhm. Briider. 2 Lieder, a 4:
Der Tag vertreibt ; Die Nacht
ist kommen.
19. Do. 2 Lieder, a 4 : Verleih' uns
Frieden ; mimm' von uns.
20. Walther. ^terno gratias, a 4.
21. Gesfinge Martin Luthers, a 4:
Mit Fried und Freud ; Es
vroll' uns Gott : Nun komm
der Heiden Heiland; Christ
lag ; Jesus Christus.
142
EOCHLITZ.
22. Callus. Eccequomodomoritur
Justus, .1 4.
23. Do. Adoramus, & 6.
24. Do. Media vita, 2 choirs, a 4.
25. Vulpius. Exultate justi, ft 4.
26. Do. SurrexitChristus, 2 choirs,
a 4.
27. Walliser. Gaudent in coelis, 2
choirs, ft 4.
28. Prastorius. Ecce Dominus, 48.
Appendix.
Palestrina. Et incarnatus, etc.
(from mass 'Assumpta est '). & 6.
Prsetorius. O vos omnes.
THIED PERIOD (1600-1700).
5.
6.
1. Caccini. Solo and chorus, Fu-
neste piaggie.
2. Do. Chorus, Blondo arcier.
8. Carissimi. Eecitative and
chorus, Turbabuntur (from
Cantata 'Plaintes des re-
prouveV).
4. Do. Ardens est cor, 4 solos
and chorus.
Do. O sacrum convivium, 3
solo voices.
Do. Cantemus omnes, chorus
and scena (JeBa).
Plorate, a 6.
7. Benevoli. Sanctus, 4 choirs, a 4.
8. Do. Christe, a 4.
9. Bernabei. Alleluja, il 4.
10. Do. Salve regina, ft 4.
11. A. Scarlatti. Kyrie. ft 4.
Do. Gloria, a 5.
Do. Vacuum est, Canto solo
and chorus, with violins.
Do. Sanctus, ft 4,: and Agnus.
ft 7.
15. Caldara. Salve regina, a 3.
16. Do. Agnus, alto and tenor.
17. Do. Qui tollis. ft *.
12.
13.
14.
18. Astorga. Stabat.
19. Do. Fac me.
20. Do. O quam.
21. Durante. Kyrie.
22. Do. Kegina angelorum.
23. Do. Bequiem aeternam.
24. Do. Domine Jesu.
25. Lotti. Crucifixus, a 6.
26. Do. Qui tollis, a 4.
27. Do. Crucifixus, ft 8.
28. Marcello. TJdir' le orecchie,
Ps. xliv, ft 4.
29. Do. Et incarnatus, ft 4.
30. Hasler. Pater noster, ft 7.
31. H. Schiitz. 6elig slnd die
Todten, ft 4.
32. Do. Chorus, Christus isthier,
ft 4.
33. Do. Psalm, Was betrttbst du ?
34. Do. Vater unser.
35. V. Leisring. Trotz sey dem
Teufel, 2 choirs, ft 4.
36. Grimm. Gloria, ft 5.
37. J. J. Fux. Domine Jesu, ft 4.
38. Do. Tremd la terra, Coro
from oratorio 'La Deposi-
zione.'
FOURTH PERIOD (1700-1760).
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Do.
Handel. Te Deum, in D,
Glorias tuae.
Do. He sent a thick darkness.
He rebuked the Red Sea.
And Israel saw.
Behold the Lamb of God.
He was despised.
Thy rebuke.
Lift up your heads.
Hear Jacob's God.
Zadok the Priest.
Christoph Bach. Ich lasse dich
nicht.
J. S. Bach. :Nimm' von uns
Herr.
Do. Mache dich mein Geist.
Do. Wir setzen uns Thriinen
nieder.
Do. Wie sich ein Vater. Lobet
den Herrn.
Zelenka. Credo.
Telemann. Amen, lob und
Ehre, ft 8.
Stolzel. Gloria."
Homilius. Vater unser, ft 4.
Pasterwitz. Requiem.
Basse. Duet and Chorus, Le
porteanoi.
Do. Alto solo.Ad te clamamus.
23. Basse. Miserere, and Benigni.
24. Do. Te Deum, ft 4.
25. Graun. Machet die Thure welt.
26. Do. Tu rex glorias, ft 4.
27. Do. Freuet euch (Tod Jesu).
28. Do. Wir hier liegen. Do.
29. Rolle. Der Herr ist KOnig.
30. Do. Welt-Richter (Tod Abel).
31. Wolf. Laus et perennis gloria,
ft 4.
32. Do. Des Lebens Fiirsten.
33. C. P. E. Bach. Et misericordia,
ft 6, from Magnificat.
34. Do. Heilig, 2 choirs, ft 4.
35. M. Haydn. Salvos fac nos.
36. Do. Tenebrae factse.
37. Do. Miserere.
38. Leo. Coro, Di quanta pena.
(S. Elena).
39. Do. Et incarnatus.
4ft, Do. Miserere ; Ecce enim.ft 8.
41. Jomelli. Confirma hoc Deus, 5
solos and chorus.
42. Do. Miserere.
43. Pergolesi. Eja ergo (Salve
Eegina).
44. Do. Qui tollis. ft 6.
45. • Do. Stabat Mater.
[G.]
ROCK, MICHAEL, was appointed organist of
St. Margaret's, Westminster, June 4, 1802, in
succession to William Eock, junr., who had filled
the office from May 24, 1774. He composed
some popular glees — ' Let the sparkling wine go
round ' (which gained a prize at the Catch Club
in 1 794), ' Beneath a churchyard yew,' etc. He
died in March, 1809. [W.H.H.]
BODE, PIERRE, a great violinist, was born
at Bourdeaux, Feb. 26, 1774. When 8 years of
age he came under the tuition of Fauvel aine', a
well-known violinist of his native town, and
studied under him for six years. In 1788 he was
sent to Paris. Here Punto (or Stich), the famous
horn-player, heard him, and being struck with the
boy's exceptional talent, gave him an introduc
tion to Viotti, who at once accepted him as his
pupil. With this great master he studied for two
PtODE.
years, and in 1790 made his first public appear
ance, when he played Viotti's 1 3th Concerto at
the Theatre de Monsieur with complete success.
Although then but 16 years of age, he was
appointed leader of the second violins in the
excellent band of the Theatre Feydeau. In this
position, appearing at the same time frequently
as soloist, he remained till 1 794, and then started
for his first tour to Holland and the north of
Germany. His success, especially at Berlin and
Hamburg, was great. From the latter place
he took passage to his native town. But the
vessel was compelled by adverse winds to
make for the English coast. So Rode came to
London ; but he only once appeared in public,
at a concert for a charitable purpose, and left
England again for Holland and Germany. Finally
he returned to France and obtained a professor
ship of the violin at the newly established Con
servatoire at Paris. In 1 799 he went to Spain,
and at Madrid met Boccherini, who is said to
have written the orchestration for Rode's earlier
concertos, especially for that in B minor. On
his return to Paris in 1800 he was appointed
solo-violinist to the First Consul, and it was at
that period that he achieved his greatest success
in the French capital. A special sensation was
created by his joint performance with Kreutzer
of a Duo concertante of the latter's composition.
In 1803 he went with Boieldieu to Petersburg.
Spohr heard him on his passage through Bruns
wick, and was so impressed that for a considerable
time he made it his one aim to imitate his style
and manner as closely as possible. Arrived at
the Russian capital Rode met with a most enthusi
astic reception, and was at once attached to the
private music of the Emperor with a salary of
5000 roubles (about 750?.). But the fatigues of
life in Russia were so excessive that from this
period a decline of his powers appears to have
set in. On his return to Paris in 1808 his recep
tion was less enthusiastic than in former times,
and even his warmest friends and admirers could
not but feel that he had lost considerably in cer
tainty of execution and vigour of style. From
1811 we find him again travelling in Germany'
Spohr, who heard him in 1813 at Vienna, says
in his autobiography (i. 178) : ' I awaited with
feverish excitement the performance of Rode,
to whom ten years before I had looked up
to as my highest ideal. But he had hardly
finished his first solo before I thought that he
had much fallen off. His playing appeared to
me cold and manneristic. I missed his former
boldness in the execution of technical difficulties,
nor could I feel satisfied with his cantilene.
The concerto also which he played appeared
to me in no way equal to his 7th in A minor,
and when he played his variations in E major—
the same I had heard him play ten years ago —
I felt sure that he had lost much of his execu
tion ; for he not only had simplified many of the
difficult passages, but even in this modified form
played them in a timid and uncertain manner.
The audience also seemed hardly satisfied. By the
incessant repetition of the same few pieces his
RODE.
style had become to such a degree manneristic,
as to present almost a caricature of what it used
to be.'
In Vienna Rode came into contact with Bee
thoven, who finished the great Sonata in G, op.
96, expressly for him. It was played by Rode
and the Archduke Rudolph, Beethoven's pupil,
at a private concert, but as far as the violin part
was concerned, not much to the composer's satis
faction. Soon afterwards, at any rate, Beethoven
requested the Archduke to send the violin part
to Rode that he might play it over before a
second performance, and he adds : ' he will not
take it amiss ; certainly not ! would to God there
were reason to beg his pardon for doing so.'1
Fe'tis's statement that Beethoven wrote a Ro
mance for Rode, probably rests on a confusion
of the G major Sonata with the Romanza in the
same key.
In 1814 Rode went to Berlin, married, and re
mained for some time. He then retired to his
native place. At a later date he made an ill-
advised attempt to resume a public career. But
his appearance at Paris proved a complete failure,
and Mendelssohn, writing from thence in April
1825, says that he was fixed in his resolution
never again to take a fiddle in hand.2 This
failure he took so much to heart, that his health
began to give way, and he died at Bourdeaux,
Nov. 25, 1830.
Rode was one of the greatest of all violinists.
During the earlier part of his career, he displayed
all the best qualities of a grand, noble, pure, and
thoroughly musical style. His intonation was
perfect ; his tone large and pure ; boldness and
vigour, deep and tender feeling, characterised his
performances. In fact he was no mere virtuoso,
but a true artist. His truly musical nature shows
itself equally in his compositions. Although his
general musical education appears to have been,
like that of most French violinists, deficient
(we have already mentioned that Boccherini
added the simple orchestration to his earlier con
certos), yet his works, especially his concertos,
have a noble dignified character and considerable
charm of melody, while it need hardly be added,
they are thoroughly suited to the nature of the
violin. On the other hand, they hardly show high
creative power; of thematic treatment there is
very little, the form, though not unsymmetrical,
is somewhat loose, and the instrumentation poor.
He published 10 concertos ; 5 sets of quartets ;
7 sets of variations ; 3 books of duos for 2 violins,
and the well-known 24 caprices.
Of his concertos, the 7th, in A minor, is
still in the repertoire of some eminent violinists.
The variations in G major — the same which the
famous singer Catalani and other celebrated
vocalists after her have made their cheval de
bataille — still enjoy popularity. But above all,
his '24 caprices or Etudes' will always, along
with Kreutzer's famous 40 caprices, hold their
place as indispensable for a sound study of the
violin.
» Thayer, life of Beethoven, UL p. 223.
2 ' Die Familie Mendelssohn,' i. p. 149,
ROECKEL.
143
Although, owing to his life of travel, he had
but few direct pupils, his influence through his
example and compositions on the violinists of
France, and move especially of Germany, was
very great indeed, Bohm, the master of J oachim,
and Eduard Rietz, the friend of Mendelssohn,
both studied under him for some time. [P-D.j
RODWELL, GEORGE HERBERT BONAPARTE,
born Nov. 15, 1800, son of Thos. Rodwell, part
proprietor and manager of the Adelphi Theatre,
London, and author of several dramatic pieces,
was for many years mUsic director of the Adelphi,
On the death of his father, in March 1825, he
succeeded to his share in the theatre. He was
the composer of very many operettas and other
dramatic pieces, of which the following are the
principal ; viz. ' The Bottle Imp ' and ' The
Mason of Buda * (partly adapted from Auber's
'Le Ma9on'), 1828; 'The Spring Lock,' 'The
Earthquake,' and 'The Devil's Elixir,' 1829;
'The Black Vulture,' 1830; 'My Own Lover,'
and 'The Evil Eye,' 1832; 'The Lord of the
Isles,' 1834; 'Paul Clifford' (with Blewitt),
1835; 'The Sexton of Cologne,' 1836; 'Jack
Sheppard,' 1839; and 'The Seven Sisters of
Munich,' 1847. In 1836 he was director of the
music at Covent Garden. He was author of
several farces and other dramatic pieces, amongst
which were 'Teddy the Tiler ' (written for Tyrone
Power, and eminently successful), 'The Chimney-
piece,' 'My Own Lover,' 'The Pride of Birth,'
'The Student of Lyons,' 'My Wife's out,' and
'The Seven Maids of Munich'; of three novels,
' Old London Bridge,' ' Memoirs of an Umbrella/
and ' Woman's Love ' ; and of ' The Eirst Rudi
ments of Harmony,' 1830. He composed also
two collections of songs : ' Songs of the Sabbath
Eve,' and 'Songs of the Birds.' His compo
sitions abound in pleasing melodies. He for
many years persistently advocated the establish
ment of a National Opera. He married the
daughter of Liston, the comedian; died in Upper
Ebury Street, Pimlico, Jan. 22, 1852, and was
buried at Brompton Cemetery. [W.H.H.]
ROECKEL, Professor JOSEPH AUGUSTUS, was
born Aug. 28, 1783, at Neumburg vorm Wald, in
the Upper Palatinate. He was originally in
tended for the church, but in 1803 entered the
diplomatic service of the Elector of Bavaria as
Private Secretary to the Bavarian Charge" d' Af
faires at Salzburg. On the recall of the Salzburg
Legation in 1804, he accepted an engagement to
sing at the An-der-Wien Theatre at Vienna,
where, March 29, 1806, he appeared as Florestan
in the revival of Beethoven's 'Fidelio.'3 In 1823
Roeckel was appointed Professor of Singing at
the Imperial Opera ; in 1828 he undertook the
direction of the opera at Aix-la-Chapelle, and in
the following year made the bold experiment of
producing German operas in Paris with a complete
German company. Encouraged by the success of
this venture, Professor Roeckel remained in Paris
until 1832, when he brought his company to
8 For Roeckel's own account of his intercourse with Beethoven, see
Thayer, vol. ii. p. 294, and vol. iii. 269.
144
KOECKEL.
London, and produced 'Fidelio,' ' Der Freischiitz,'
and other masterpieces of the German school, at
the King's Theatre ; the principal artists being
Schroder -Devrient and Haitzinger, with Hummel
(Roeckel's brother-in-law) as conductor. In
1835 he retired from operatic life, and in 1853
finally returned to Germany, where he died, at
Anhalt-Cothen, in September, 1870.
AUGUSTUS, the eldest son of the above, was
born Dec. I, 1814, at Gratz. He was joint
Kapellmeister at the Dresden Opera with Richard
Wagner, but being, like the latter, involved in
the 'Revolution of 1848, he abandoned music and
devoted himself entirely to politics. He died at
Buda Pesth on June 18, 1876.
EDWABD, the second son of Professor Roeckel,
was born at Treves on Nov. 20, 1816, and received
his musical education from his uncle J. N. Hum
mel. He came to London in 1835, and gave his
first concert in 1836 at the King's Theatre. He
subsequently went on a concert-tour in Germany,
and performed with great success at the courts
of Prussia, Saxony, Saxe-Weimar, Anhalt-Dessau,
etc. In 1848 Mr. Roeckel settled in England,
and resides at Bath, where he succeeded the late
Henry Field. He is known as the composer of
a considerable quantity of pianoforte music, and
is otherwise much esteemed.
JOSEPH LEOPOLD, the youngest son of Professor
Roeckel, was born in London in the year 1838.
He studied composition at Wiirzburg under
Eisenhofer, and orchestration under Gotze, at
Weimar. Like his brother, Mr. J. L. Roeckel
has settled in England, and lives at Clifton ; he
is well known as a teacher, and a voluminous
composer of songs. His orchestral and instru
mental compositions are less well known, but his
cantatas ' Fair Rosamond,' ' Ruth,' ' The Sea
Maidens,' 'Westward Ho/ and 'Mary Stuart,'
have been received with much favour. The first
of these was performed at the Crystal Palace in
1871. [W.B.S.]
RONTGEN, ENGELBERT, born Sept. 30, 1829,
.at Deventer in Holland, entered the Conserva-
torium at Leipzig in 1 848 ; as a pupil of David's
became a first-rate violinist, and in 1869 took
David's place as Concerfcmeister in the Gewand-
haus orchestra. He is now a teacher in the
Conservator ium. He married a daughter of
Moritz Klengel, himself Concertmeister at the
Gewandhaus for many years. Their son,
JULIUS, was born at Leipzig May 9, 1855, and
soon displayed a great gift for music. His parents
were his first teachers, and he afterwards learned
from Hauptmann, Richter, Plaidy and Reinecke.
In 1872 he went to Munich, and remained there
for some time studying counterpoint and compo
sition under Franz Lachner. A tour with Stock -
hausen in 1873-4, during which he played
chiefly his own compositions, launched him fa
vourably before the world. He now lives in
Amsterdam. His published works amount to 18,
almost all of a serious character. They are, for
the PF.~ a duet for 4 hands, in 4 movements,
(op. 16) ; two sonatas (op. 2, 10), a phantasie
^op. 8) ; a suite (op. 7) ; a ballade (op. 5),
ROGER.
a cyclus of pieces (op. 6), and a theme with
variations (op. 17), etc. etc.; a sonata for PF.
and violin (op. i) and for PF. and cello (op. 3);
a concerto for PF. and orchestra (op. 18) ; a
serenade for 7 wind instruments (op. 14) ; 'Tos-
kanische Rispetti,' a Liederspiel (op. 9) ; 9 songs
(op. 15) etc. etc. The cello sonata was played
at the Monday Popular Concert of Feb. 14, 1881,
and was well received. [G.]
ROGEL, JOSE, Spanish conductor and com
poser, born at Orihuela, Alicante, Dec. 24, 1829;
began music under Cascales and Gil, organist
and conductor of the cathedral, and made great
progress, till sent to Valencia by his father to
study law. The six years which he spent there
were however devoted much more to music than
to law, under the guidance of Pascual Perez, a
musician of ability, from whom he learned com
position and other branches of practical music.
After completing his legal course and taking his
degree at Madrid, Rogel was able to indulge
his taste, plunged into music without re
straint and became, or at any rate acted as, con
ductor and composer to several theatres. The
notice of him in M. Pougin's supplement to Fe'tis,
from which this notice is taken, enumerates no
less than 61 zarzuelas or dramatic pieces of his
composition, 14 of them in three acts, 8 in two
acts, and the remainder in one act, besides a
dozen not yet brought out. The titles of the
pieces are of all characters, ranging from ' Revista
de un rnuerto' and ' Un Viage de mil demonios'
to ' El General Bumbum.' No criticism is given
on the merits of the music, but it must at least
be popular. [G.j
ROGER, GUSTAVE HIPPOLITE, eminent French
singer, born Dec. 17, 1815, at La Chapelle-Saint-
Denis, Paris. He was brought up by an uncle, and
educated at the Lyce"e Charlemagne for the legal
profession, but his studies were so neglected for
an amateur theatre of which he was the leading
tenor and self-constituted manager, that he was
at length allowed to follow his real vocation.
He entered the Conservatoire in 1836, and after
studying for a year under Martin carried off the
first prizes both for singing and ope'ra-comique.
He obtained an immediate engagement, and
made his de'but at the Op^ra Comique, Feb. 16,
1838, as Georges in 'L'Eclair.' To a charming
voice and distinguished appearance he added
great intelligence and stage tact, qualities which
soon made him the favourite tenor of the Parisian
world, and one of the best comedians of the day.
Ambroise Thomas composed for him 'Le Per-
ruquier de la Re'gence ' and * Mina,' Halevy gave
him capital parts in ' Les Mousquetaires de la
Reine ' and ' Le Guitarrero,' and Auber, always
partial to gentlemanlike actors, secured him for
'Le Domino Noir,' 'La Part du Diable,' 'La
Sirene,' and 'Hayde'e.' Clapisson too owed to
him the success of his ' Gibby la cornemuse.1
In ' Hayde'e ' the tenor of the Theatre Favart so
distinguished himself as Lore'dan that Meyer
beer declared him to be the only French artist
capable of creating the part of John of Leyden.
In consequence, after ten years of uninterrupted
ROGER.
success, Koger left the Opdra Comique for the
Academie, where on April 16, 1849, he created
an immense sensation with Mine. Viardot, in
'Le Prophete.' His acting was quite as good
in tragedy as it had been in comedy, but his
voice could not stand the wear and tear of the
fatiguing repertoire he had now to undertake.
During the next ten years however he was in
valuable at the Ope"ra, creating new parts in
the ' Enfant prodigue,1 the ' Juif errant,' and
many more. His best creation after John of
Leyden, and his last part at the Ope"ra, was
Helios in David's ' Herculanum ' (March 4, 1859).
In the following autumn he lost his right arm
while shooting, by the bursting of a gun ; he
reappeared with a false one, but with all his
skill and bravery he could not conceal his mis
fortune, and found himself compelled to bid fare
well to the Academic and to Paris.
He went once more to Germany, which he
had been in the habit of visiting since 1850, and
where he was invariably successful, partly owing
to his unusual command of the language. After
this he sang in the principal provincial theatres
of France, and in 1861 reappeared at the Ope"ra
Comique in his best parts, especially that of
Georges Brown in ' La Dame Blanche,' but it
was evident that the time for his retirement had
arrived. He then took pupils for singing, and
in 1868 accepted a professorship at the Conser
vatoire, which he held till his death, Sept. 12,
1879-
Roger was of an amiable and benevolent dis
position. He talked well, wrote with ease, and
was the author of the French translation to
Haydn's ' Seasons,' and of the words of several
romances and German Lieder. His book, ' Le
Garnet d'un tenor' (Paris, 011endorff,iS8o),isapor-
tion of his autobiography. It contains an account
of his visits to England in 1847 (June), and 1848
(June — Nov.), when he sang at the Royal Italian
Opera, and made an artistic tour in the provinces
with Mile. Jenny Lind, and other artists. [G.C.]
ROGERS, BENJAMIN, Mus. Doc., eon of Peter
Rogers, lay-clerk of St. George's Chapel, Windsor,
was born at Windsor in 1614. He was a chorister
of St. George's under Dr. Giles, and afterwards a
lay-clerk there. He next became organist of
Christ Church, Dublin, whe"re he continued until
the rebellion in 1641, when he returned to
Windsor and obtained a lay-clerk's place there ;
but on the breaking up of the choir in 1644 he
taught music in Windsor and its neighbourhood,
and obtained some compensation for the loss of
his appointment. In 1653 he composed some
airs in 4 parts for violins and organ, which were
presented to the Archduke Leopold, afterwards
Emperor of Germany, and favourably received
by him. In 1658 he was admitted Mus. Bac. at
Cambridge. In 1660 he composed a 'Hymnus
Eucharisticus ' in 4 parts, to words by Dr. Na
thaniel Ingelo, which was performed at Guildhall
when Charles II. dined there on July 5.1 About
» This hymn was different from that, bearing the same title, which
Rogers afterwards set for Magdaien College, Oxford.
VOL. UI. FT. 2.
KOI DES VIOLONS.
145
the same time he became organist of Eton College.
On Oct. 21, 1662, he was reappointed a lay -clerk
at St. George's, Windsor, his stipend being aug
mented by half the customary amount ; and he
also received out of the organist's salary £i per
month as deputy organist. On July 22, 1664, he
was appointed Informator Choristarum and or
ganist of Magdalen College, Oxford. On July 8,
1669, he proceeded Mus. Doc. at Oxford. In
Jan. 1685 he was removed from his place at
Magdalen College on account of irregularities,
the College however assuring to him an annuity
of £30 for life. He survived until June, 1698,
on the 2 ist of which month he wras buried at St.
Peter-le-Bailey. His widow, whom the College
had pensioned with two-thirds of his annuity, sur
vived him only seven months, and was laid by his
side Jan. 5, 1699. — Rogers composed much church
music ; four services are printed in the collec
tions of Boyce, Rimbault, and Sir F. Ouseley ;
another, an Evening Verse Service in G, ap
pears to be at Ely in MS. Some anthems were
printed in 'Cantica Sacra,' 1674, and by Boyce
and Page ; and many others are in MS. in the
books of various cathedrals and college chapels.
Four glees are contained in Playford's ' Musical
Companion,' 1673, an(^ niany instrumental com
positions in 'Courtly Masquing Ayres,' 1662.
His ' Hymnus Eucharisticus ' (the first stanza of
which, commencing 'Te Deum Patrem colimus/
is daily sung in Magdalen College Hall by way
of grace after dinner, and is printed in the Ap
pendix to Hawkins's History) is sung annually on
the top of Magdalen tower at five in the morning
of May i. His service in D and some of his
anthems, which are pleasing and melodious in
character, are still sung in cathedrals. [W.H.H.]
ROGERS, JOHN, a famous lutenist, born in
London, was attached to the household of Charles
II. He resided near Aldersgate, and died there
about 1663. [W.H.H.]
ROGERS, SIR JOHN LEMAN.Bart., born April
18, 1780, succeeded his father in the baronetcy in
1797- He became a member of the Madrigal
Society in 1819, and in 1820 was elected its
permanent President (being the first so ap
pointed), and held the office until 1841, when he
resigned on account of ill health. He composed
a cathedral service, chants, anthems, madrigals,
glees, and other vocal music. [See Hullah's PAKT
Music, Class A, and VOCAL SCORES.] He was
an ardent admirer of the compositions of Tallis,
and by his exertions an annual service was held
for several years in Westminster Abbey, the
music being wholly that of Tallis. He died
Dec. 10, 1847. [W.H.H.]
ROI DES VIOLONS— 'King of the violins '—
a title of great interest as illustrating the struggle
between Art and Authority. On Sept. 14, 1321,
the menestriers or fiddlers of France formed them
selves into a regular corporation, with a code of
laws in 1 1 sections, which was presented to the
Prevot of Paris, and by him registered at the
Chatelet. The Confraternity, founded by 37
jongleurs &ndjonyleresses, whose names have been
146
HOI DES VIOLONS.
preserved, prospered so far as in 1330 to pur
chase a site and erect on it a hospital for poor
musicians. The building was begun in 1331,
finished in 1335, and dedicated to St. Julien and
St. Genest. The superior of this ' Confre'rie of
St. Julien des me'ne'triers' was styled ' king,' and
the following were 'Hois des me'ne'triers' in the
I4th century :— Robert Caveron, 1338 ; Copin du
Brequin, 1349; Jean Caumez, 1387; and Jehan
Portevin, 1392.
In 1407 the musicians, vocal and instrumental,
separated themselves from the mountebanks and
tumblers who had been associated with them by
the statutes of 1321. The new constitution re
ceived the sanction of Charles VI., April 24,
1407, and it was enacted that no musician might
teach, or exercise his profession, without having
passed an examination, and been declared suffisant
by the ' Roi des me'nestrels' or his deputies.
These statutes continued in force down to the
middle of the I7th century. History however
tells but little about the new corporation. The
only ' rois ' whose names have been preserved in
the charters are — Jehan Boissard, called Verde-
let, 1420 ; Jehan Facien, the elder, and Claude de
Bouchardon, oboes in the band of Henri III, 1575 ;
Claude Nyon, 1590 ; Claude Nyon, called Lafont,
1600; Franfois Rishomme, 1615; and Louis
Constantin, 'roi' from 1624 to 1655. Constantin,
who died in Paris 1657, was a distinguished artist,
violinist to Louis XIII., and composer of pieces
for strings in 5 and 6 parts, several of which
are preserved in the valuable collection already
named under PHILIDOR.
In 1514 the title was changed to 'roi des
me'nestrels du royaume.' All provincial musicians
were compelled to acknowledge the authority of
the corporation in Paris, and in the i6th century
branches were established in the principal towns
of France under the title of 'Confre'rie de St.
Julien des me'ne'triers.' In Oct. 1658, Louis XIV.
confirmed Constantin 's successor, Guillaume Du-
manoir I., in the post of ' Roi des violons, maitres
a danser, et joueurs d'instruments tant haut que
bas,' ordaining at the same time that the 'Roi
des violons ' should have the sole privilege of
conferring the mastership of the art throughout
the kingdom ; that no one should be admitted
thereto without serving an apprenticeship of 4
years, and paying 60 livres to the ' roi,' and 10
livres to the masters of the Confre'rie ; the masters
themselves paying an annual sum of 30 sous to
the corporation, with a further commission to the
' roi ' for each pupil. The masters alone were
privileged to play in taverns and other public
places, and in case this rule were infringed, the
' roi ' could send the offender to prison and destroy
his instruments. This formidable monopoly ex
tended even to the King's band, the famous
' 24 violons,' who were admitted to office by the
* roi ' alone on payment of his fee. [See VINGT
QUATRE VIOLONS.]
So jealously did Guillaume Dumanoir I. guard
his rights, that in 1662 he commenced an action
against 1 3 dancing-masters, who, with the view of
throwing off the yoke of the corporation, had
ROI DES VIOLONS.
obtained from Louis XIV. permission to found
an ' Academic de danse.' The struggle gave rise
to various pamphlets,1 and Dumanoir was beaten
at all points. He bequeathed a difficult task to
his son Michel Guillaume Dumanoir II., who
succeeded him as 'roi' in 1668, and endeavoured
to enforce his supremacy on the instrumentalists
of the Academic de Musique, but, as might have
been expected, was overmatched by Lully. After
his difficulties with the director of the OpeYa,
Dumanoir II., like his father, came into collision
with the dancing-masters. In 1691 a royal
proclamation was issued by which the elective
committee was abolished, and its place filled by
hereditary officials, aided by four others appointed
by purchase. Against this decree the corporation
and the 13 members of the Acade"mie de danse
protested, but the Treasury was in want of funds,
and declined to refund the purchase money. Find
ing himself unequal to such assaults Dumanoir
resigned in 1693, and died in Paris in 1697. He
delegated his powers to the privileged committee
of 1691, and thus threw on them the onus of sup
porting the claims of the Confre'rie over the clave-
cinists and organists of the kingdom ; a parlia
mentary decree of 1695, however, set free the com
posers and professors of music from all dependence
on the corporation of the mdn&t/riers. This struggle
was several times renewed. When Pierre Guignon
(born 1702, died 1775), a good violinist, and a
member of the King's chamber-music, and of the
Chapel Royal, attempted to reconstitute the
Confrerie on a better footing, it became evident
that the musicians as a body were determined to
throw off the yoke of the association. Guignon
was appointed ' Roi des violons ' by letters patent,
June 15, 1741, was installed in 1742, and in 1747
endeavoured to enforce certain new enactments,
but a parliamentary decree of May 30, i75°> Put
an end to his pretended authority over clave-
cinists, organists, and other serious musicians.
The corporation was maintained, but its head
was obliged to be content with the title of ' Koi
et maitre des me'ne'triers, joueurs d'instruments
tant haut que bas, et hautbois, et communaut^
des maitres a danser.' Roi Guignon still preserved
the right of conferring on provincial musicians
the title of ' lieutenants ge'ne'raux et particuliers'
to the ' roi des violons,' but even this was abro
gated by a decree of the Conseil d'Etat, Feb. I3»
1773. The last 'roi des violons' at once re
signed, and in the following month his office was
abolished by an edict of the King dated from
Versailles.
This hasty sketch of a difficult subject may be
supplemented by consulting the following works;
'Abre'ge' historique de la Mdnestrandie ' (Ver
sailles, 1774, i-zmo) ; 'Statuts et re"glements des
maitres de danse et joueurs d'instruments . . •
registry's au Parlement le 22 Aout 1659' (Paris,
1 Of these the principal are ' Etablissement de 1' Academic royale de
dance [sic] en la ville de Paris, avec un discours Acad^mique pour
prouver que la dance, dans sa plus noble partie. n'a pas besoin del
instruments de musique, et qu'elle est en tout absolumeut ind^pen-
dante du violon ' (Paris, 1663, 4to), and 'Le mariage de la musique et
de la dance, contenant la r6ponce [tic] au livre des treize pretendui
academicians touchauts ces deux arts ' (Paris. 1664, 12mo).
ROT DES VIOLONS.
1753); ' Recueil d'e"dits, arrets du Conaeil du roi,
lettres paten tes, ... en faveur des musiciens du
Royaume' (Ballard, 1774, 8vo) ; and 'Les
Instruments a archet' by A. Vidal (i. and ii.
Paris, 1876, 77; 4to"), which last contains nearly
all the necessary information. [G. C.]
ROKITANSKY, VICTOR, FREIHERR VON, of
Hungarian origin, the son of a celebrated phy
sician at Vienna, where he was born, July 9,
1836. He studied singing chiefly at Bologna
and Milan. He first appeared in England at
concerts in 1856. In 62 he made his de"but
at Prague in 'La Juive,' and fulfilled a very
successful engagement there of two years. In
63 he made a few appearances at Vienna, and
in 64 obtained an engagement there, and has
been a member of the opera company ever since.
His voice is a basso-profondo of great compass
and volume, very equal in all its range ; he has a
commanding presence, and is an excellent actor.
His operas include La Juive, Robert le Diable,
Les Huguenots, Don Juan, Zauberflote, Guil-
laume Tell, Le Prophete, Aida, Faust, Medea,
and Wagner's operas.
On June 17, 65, he reappeared in London at
Her Majesty's as Marcel with very great success,
and then sang there for four consecutive seasons,
and was greatly esteemed. He played with
success as Rocco, Sarastro, Leporello, II Commen-
datore, Oroveso, Falstaff, Osmin (June 30, 66, on
production in Italian of Mozart's ' Entfiihrung'),
and Padre Guardiano in ' La Forza del Des-
tino.' He returned for the seasons of '76 and
'77 in some of his old parts, and played for the
first time the King in 'Lohengrin,' and Giorgio
in ' I Puritani.'
From 1871 to 1880 he filled the post of
Professor of Singing at the Conservatorium of
Vienna, but has now relinquished that position
for private tuition, where he employs the
Italian method which has formed the basis
of his own great success. [A.C.]
ROLLA, ALESSANDRO, violinist and com
poser, born at Pavia, April 6, 1757. He first
studied the pianoforte, but soon exchanged it for
the violin, which he learned under Renzi and
Conti. He had also a great predilection for the
viola, and wrote and performed in public con
certos for that instrument. For some years he
was leader of the band at Parma, and it was
there that Paganini was for some months his
pupil. [See PAGANINI.] In 1802 he went to
Milan as leader and conductor of the opera at
La Scala, in which position he gained a great
reputation. He was also for many years a pro
fessor at the Conservatorio of Milan, and died
in that town, September 15, 1841, aged 84. His
compositions, now entirely forgotten, had con
siderable success in their time ; they consist of
a large number of violin duets, some trios,
quartets and quintets for stringed instruments,
and concertos for the violin and for the viola.
His son and pupil, ANTONIO, violinist, was
born at Parma, April 18, 1798 ; from 1823 till
1835 wa3 leader of the Italian Opera band at
Dresden, and died there, May 19, 1837. He
ROMANCE.
147
published concertos and other solo pieces for the
violin. [P.D.]
ROLL-CALL. [See SIGNALS.]
ROLLE. A German musical family. The
father was town musician of Quedlinburg and
of Magdeburg in 1721, and died there in 1752.
Of his three sons, CHRISTIAN CARL, born at
Quedlinburg in 1714, was Cantor of the Jeru
salem Church, Berlin, but was apparently of no
account. He had sons, of whom FRIEDRICH
HEINRICH left a biography of his father ; while
CHRISTIAN CARL (the younger) succeeded him
as Cantor. 2. A second son is mentioned, but
not named. 3. The third, JOHANN HEINRICH,
was born at Quedlinburg, December 23, 1718,
and at an early age began to play and to write.
He got a good general education at the High
School in Leipzig, and migrated to Berlin in
hopes of some legal post ; but this failing he
adopted music as his career, and entered the
Court chapel of Frederick the Great as a
chamber musician. There he remained till 1 746,
and then took the organist's place at St. John's,
Magdeburg. On the death of his father he
stepped into his post as town-musician, worked
there with uncommon zeal and efficiency, and
died at the age of 67, December 29, 1785. — His
industry seems almost to have rivalled that of
Bach himself. He left several complete annual
series of church music for all the Sundays and
Festivals ; cantatas for Easter, Whitsuntide,
and Christmas, of which many are in the Royal
Library at Berlin ; 5 Passions, and at least 60
other large church compositions. Besides these
there exist 21 large works of his, of a nature
between oratorio and drama, such as ' Saul, or
the power of Music,' 'Samson,' ' David and Jona
than,' ' The Labours of Hercules,' 'Orestes and
Pylades,' ' Abraham on Moriah,' ' The Death of
Abel,' etc. The last two were for many years per
formed annually at Berlin, and were so popular
that the editions had to be renewed repeatedly.
In addition to these he left many songs and com
positions for organ, orchestra, and separate instru
ments. All have now as good as perished ; but
those who wish to know what kind of music they
were will find a specimen in Hullah's ' Vocal
scores,' ' The Lord is King.' It has a good deal of
vigour, but no originality or character. Others are
given in the Collections of Sander and Rochlitz,
and a set of twenty motets for 4 voices was pub
lished at Magdeburg by Rebling (185 1-66.) [G.]
ROMANCE (Germ. Romanze). A term of very
vague signification, answering in music to the
same term in poetry, where the characteristics are
rather those of personal sentiment and expression
than of precise form. The Romanze in Mozart's
D minor PF. Concerto differs (if it differs) from
the slow movements of his other Concertos in
the extremely tender and delicate character of
its expression ; in its form there is nothing at all
unusual : and the same may be said of Beethoven's
two Romances for the violin and orchestra in G
and F (op. 40 and 50), and of Schumann's ' Drei
Romanzen' (op. 28). Schumann has also affixed
L2
148
ROMANCE.
the title to 3 movements for oboe and PF.(op.94%
and to a well-known piece in D minor (op. 32,
no. 3), just as he, or some one of his followers,
has used the similar title, ' in Legendenton.' The
Romance which forms the second movement of
his symphony in D minor, is a little poem full of
sentimental expression.
In vocal music the term is obviously derived
from the character or title of the words. In
English poetry we have few ' romances, ' though
such of Moore's melodies as ' She is far from the
land where her young hero sleeps 'might well bear
the title. But in France they abound, and some
composers (such as Puget and Panseron) have
derived nine-tenths of their reputation from them.
' Partant pour la Syrie ' may be named as a good
example, well known on this side the water. Men
delssohn's 'Songs without Words' are called in
France 'Romances sans Paroles.' [G-]
ROMANI, FELICE, a famous Italian litte'ra-
teur, born at Genoa, January 31, 1788. He
was educated for the law, but soon forsook it for
more congenial pursuits, and was in early life
appointed to the post of poet to the royal
theatres, with a salary of 6000 lire. The fall of
the French government in Italy drove him to
his own resources. He began with a comedy,
' L'Amante e 1'Impostore,' which was very suc
cessful, and the forerunner of many dramatic
pieces. But his claim to notice in a dictionary
of music rests on his opera-librettos, in which
he was for long the favourite of the Italian com
posers. For Simone Mayer he wrote ' Medea '
(1812), 'La Rosa bianca e la Rosa rossa,' and
others; for Rossini, 'Aureliano in Palmira,'
and ' II Turco in Italia ' ; for Bellini, ' Bianca e
Faliero,' ' La Straniera,' ' La Sonnambula,' ' II
Pirata,' ' Norma,' ' I Capuletti,' and ' Beatrice
di Tenda ' ; for Donizetti, ' Lucrezia,' ' Anna
Bolena,' ' L'Elisir d'amore,' and ' Parisina ' ; for
Mercadante, ' II Conte d' Essex ' ; for Ricci, ' Un
Avventura di Scaramuccia ' ; and many others,
in all fully a hundred. As editor for many
years of the 'Gazzetta Piemontese,' he was a
voluminous writer.
In the latter part of his life he became blind,
and was pensioned by government, and spent
his last years in his family circle at Moneglia,
on the Riviera, where he died full of years and
honours, January 28, 1865. [G.]
ROMANO, ALESSANDRO — known under the
name of ALESSANDRO BELLA VIOLA — a composer
and performer on the viola, was born at Rome
about the year 1530. He was an ecclesiastic,
and a member of the order of Monte Oliveto.
His published works (according to Fe'tis) are —
two books of Canzoni Napolitane for 5 voices
(Venice, 1572 and 1575); a set of motets in
5 parts (Venice, 1579). -A- 5-part madrigal by
him, ' Non pur d'almi splendori,' is published in
the ' Libro terzo delle Muse' (Venice, Gardano,
1561). [P.D.]
ROMANTIC is a term which, with its anti
thesis CLASSICAL, has been borrowed by music
from literature. But so delicate and incorporeal
ROMANTIC.
are the qualities of composition which both words
describe in their application to music, and so
arbitrary has been their use by different writers,
that neither word is susceptible of very precise
definition. The best guide, however, to the
meaning of ' romantic ' is supplied by its etymo
logy. The poetic tales of the middle ages,
written in the old Romance dialects, were called
Romances. In them mythological fables and
Christian legends, stories of fairyland, and ad
ventures of Crusaders and other heroes of chivalry,
were indiscriminately blended, and the fantastic
figures thus brought together moved in a dim
atmosphere of mystic gloom and religious ecstasy.
These mediaeval productions had long been neg
lected and forgotten even by scholars, when,
about the close of the last century, they were
again brought into notice by a group of poets, of
whom the most notable were the brothers
August Wilhelm and Friedrich von Schlegel,
Ludwig Tieck, and Friedrich Novalis. They set
themselves to rescue the old romances from
oblivion, and to revive the spirit of medieval
poetry in modern literature by the example of
their own works. Hence they came to be called
the Romantic School, and were thus distinguished
from writers whose fidelity to rules and models
of classic antiquity gave them a claim to the
title of Classical.
It was not long before the term Romantic was
introduced into musical literature ; and it was
understood to characterise both the subjects of
certain musical works and the spirit in which
they were treated. Its antithetical significance
to the term Classical still clung to it ; and
regard to perfection of form being often subordi
nated by so-called romantic composers to the
object of giving free play to the imaginative and
emotional parts of our nature, there grew up
around the epithet Romantic the notion of a
tendency to depart more or less from the severity
of purely classical compositions. But, in truth,
no clear line divides the romantic from the
classical. As we shall endeavour to show, the
greatest names of the Classical school display the
quality of romanticism in the spirit or expression
of some of their works, while, on the other hand,
the compositions of the Romantic school are fre
quently marked by scrupulous adherence to the
; forms of traditional excellence. Again, as the
associations of the word Classical convey the
highest meed of praise, works at first pronounced
to be romantic establish, by general recognition
of their merit, a claim to be considered clas
sical. What is 'romantic' to-day may thus grow,
although itself unchanged, to be 'classical' to
morrow. The reader will thus understand why,
in Reicliardt's opinion, Bach, Handel and Gluck
were classical, but Haydn and Mozart romantic;
why later critics, in presence of the fuller
romanticism of Beethoven, placed Haydn and
Mozart among the classical composers ; and why
Beethoven himself, in his turn, was declared to
be classical.
The propriety of applying the term Romantic
to operas whose subjects are taken from romantic
ROMANTIC.
literature, or to songs where music is set to
romantic words, will not be questioned. And
from such works it is easy to select passages
which present romantic pictures to the mind, as,
for instance, the Trumpet passage on the long
Bb in the bass in the great Leonore overture, or
the three Horn notes in the overture to ' Oberon,'
or the three Drum notes in the overture to ' Der
Freischiitz.' But in pure instrumental music the
marks of romanticism are so fine, and the recog
nition of them depends so much on sympathy and
mental predisposition, that the question whether
this or that work is romantic may be a subject
of interminable dispute among critics. Some
times the only mark of romanticism would seem
to be a subtle effect of instrumentation, or a
sudden change of key, as in the following pas
sage from the Leonore Overture: —
KOMANTIC.
149
Another example from B ethoven is supplied
by the opening bars of the PF. Concerto in G
major, where after the solo has ended on the
dominant the orchestra enters pp with the chord
of B major, thus —
Solo
Strings
The whole of the Slow Movement of this Con
certo is thoroughly romantic, but perhaps that
quality is most powerfully felt in the following
passage : —
tion — as for instance, in this passage from the
Adagio of the gth Symphony: —
P dim '
etc.
Mi:
faoS
rTTif^-fi*- r * fTr^t^^^f1
»-fc. •%-+-• -Pt- T— -t- *J ^9- -*-- 9- -4-^-+-
tr • T*'-£1r. .;*-:£: £ y
Yet so subtle is the spell of its presence here
that it would be difficult to define where its
intense romanticism lies, unless it be in the
abrupt change both in key (A minor to F
major), and in the character of the phrase, al
most forcing a scene, or recollection, or image,
upon the hearer. Indeed, to romantic music
belongs in the highest degree the power of evok
ing in the mind some vivid thought or concep-
where the transition into Db seems to say,
'Vanitas vanitatum, omnia vanitas'; and again
in the Eroica, where at the end of the Trio, the
long holding notes and peculiar harmony in the
horns seem to suggest the idea of Eternity: —
Strings
(5>— '— &-- !-&--:
etc.
Many mpre illustrations might be taken from
Beethoven's works, and never has the romantic
spirit produced more splendid results than in his
five last Sonatas and in his Symphony No. 7.
But with regard to our choice of examples we
must remind the reader that, where the stand
point of criticism is almost wholly subjective,
great diversities of judgment are inevitable.
It was not until after the appearance of
the works of Carl Maria von Weber, who lived
in close relation with the romantic school of
literature, and who drew his inspirations from
their writings, that critics began to speak of
a 'romantic school of music.' Beethoven had
by this time been accepted as classical, but in
addition to Weber himself, Schubert, and after
wards Mendelssohn, Schumann, and Chopin were
all held to be representatives of the romantic
school. Widely as the composers of this new
school differed in other respects, they were alike
in their susceptibility to the tone of thought and
feeling which so deeply coloured the romantic
literature of their time. None of them were
strangers to that weariness, approaching to dis
gust, of the actual world around them, and those
150
KOMANTIC.
yearnings to escape from it, which pursued so
many of the finest minds of the generations to
•which they belonged. To men thus predisposed,
it was a relief and delight to live in an ideal
world as remote as possible from the real one.
Some took refuge in mediaeval legends, where no
border divided the natural from the supernatural,
where the transition from the one to the other
was as delicate and yet as real as that in the
passage quoted from Beethoven's Overture,
and where nothing could be incongruous or im
probable ; some in the charms and solitudes of
nature ; and others in the contemplation of peace
and beatitude beyond the grave. But in all
there was the same impatience of the material
and mundane conditions of their existence,
the same longing to dwell in the midst of
scenes and images which mortals could but
dimly see through the glass of religious or
poetic imagination. As might have been
expected of works produced under such influ
ences, indistinctness of outline was a common
attribute of compositions of the romantic school.
The hard, clear lines of reality were seldom met
with in them, and the cold analysis of pure
reason was perpetually eluded. It was equally
natural that the creations of minds withdrawn
from contact with the actual world and wrapt in
the folds of their own fancies, should vividly
reflect the moods and phases of feeling out of
which they sprang — that they should be, in
short, intensely subjective. Nor was it sur
prising that when impatience of reality, indis
tinctness of outline, and excessive subjectivity !
co-existed, the pleasures of imagination sometimes
took a morbid hue. Such conditions of origin
as we have been describing could not fail to
affect the forms of composition. It was not that
the romanticists deliberately rejected or even \
undervalued classic models, but that, borne onward
by the impulse to give free expression to their
own individuality, they did not suffer themselves
to be bound by forms, however excellent, which
they felt to be inadequate for their purpose.
Had the leaders of the romantic school been men
of less genius, this tendency might have degene
rated into disregard of form ; but happily in
them liberty did not beget license, and the art
of music was enriched by the addition of new
forms. 'The extremes,' says Goethe, speaking
of the romantic school of literature, ' will disap
pear, and at length the great advantage will
remain that a wider and more varied subject-
matter, together with a freer form, will be
attained.' Goethe's anticipations were equally
applicable to music.
Among masters of the romantic school, Weber
stands second to none. In youth he surrendered
himself to the fascination of literary romanticism,
and this early bias of his mind was confirmed in
later years by constant intercourse at Dresden
with Holtei, Tieck, E. T. A. Hoffmann, and other
men of the same cast of thought. How ex
clusively the subjects of Weber's operas were
selected from romantic literature, and how the
' Romantic Opera,' of which Germany has so
KOMANTIC.
much reason to be proud, owed to him its
origin and highest development, although the
names of Spohr,1 Marschuer, Lindpaintner,
and others are justly associated with it, are
points on which we need not linger, as they are
fully discussed in the article on OPERA. Neither
is it necessary to repeat what has been said in
the article on ORCHESTRATION of the romantic
effects which Weber could produce in his instru
mentation. Never, even in the least of his
pianoforte works, did he cease to be romantic.
Though Weber holds the first place in the
opera of the romantic school, he was excelled in
other branches of composition by his contem
porary, Franz Schubert. Pure and classic as
was the form of Schubert's symphonies and
sonatas, the very essence of romanticism is dis
closed in them by sudden transitions from one key
to another (as in the first movement of the A
minor Sonata, op. 143), and by the unexpected
modulations in his exquisite harmony. That
wealth of melody, in which he is perhaps with
out a rival, was the gift of romanticism. It
gave him also a certain indefiniteness and, as it
were, indivisibility of ideas, which some critics
have judged to be a failing, but which were in
fact the secret of his strength, because they en
abled him to repeat and develope, to change and
then again resume his beautiful motifs in long
and rich progression, without pause and without
satiety. None have known, as he knew, how to
elicit almost human sounds from a single instru
ment — as for instance, in the well-known passage
for the horn in the second movement of the C
major Symphony, of which Schumann said that
' it seems to have come to us from another world.'
Many glorious passages might be pointed out in
this Symphony, the romanticism of which it
would be difficult to surpass ; for instance, the
second subject in the first movement, the
beginning of the working out in the Finale,
etc. etc. And the complete success with which
he produced entirely novel effects from the
whole orchestra is the more astonishing when we
remember that few of his orchestral works were
ever performed in his lifetime. In ' Song' Schu
bert stands alone, while Schumann and Robert
Franz come nearest to him. Even from boyhood
he had steeped his soul in romantic poetry ; and
so expressive was the music of his songs that
they required no words to reveal their deeply
romantic character. Few were the thoughts or
feelings which Schubert's genius was unable to
express in music. 'He was' (to quote Schumann
again) ' the deadly enemy of all Philistinism, and
after Beethoven the greatest master who made
music his vocation in the noblest sense of the
word.'
Schumann's own enmity to Philistinism was
not less deadly than that of Schubert, and ro
manticism was its root in both men. So strongly
did Schumann resent the popularity of Herz,
Hiinten, and other Philistines, whose works were
in vogue about the year 1830, that he founded
1 Spohr's claim to priority of invention of the Romantic opera is
discussed in OPEEA. vol. ii. p. 520 6.
EOMANTIC.
the ' Davidsbund ' to expose the hollowness of
their pretensions. And equally dissatisfied with
the shallow and contracted views of the musical
critics of that day, he started his ' Neue Zeit-
schrift fur Musik ' to vindicate the claims of
music to freedom from every limitation, except
the laws of reason and of beauty. Even in child
hood Schumann was an eager reader of ro
mantic literature, and the writings of Hoffmann
and Jean Paul never lost their charm for him.
He told a correspondent that if she would rightly
understand his ' Papillons,' op. 2, she must read
the last chapter of Jean Paul's ' Flegeljahre' ;
and from Hoffmann he borrowed the title of
' Kreisleriana.' It was not however the imagin
ary sufferings of Dr. Kreissler, but the real deep
sorrows of Schumann's own soul which expressed
themselves in these noble fantasias. Though
perfect in form, they are thoroughly romantic in
thought and spirit. Not less romantic were the
names he gave to his pianoforte pieces. These
names, he said, were scarcely necessary — 'for is
not music self-sufficing ? does it not speak for
itself? ' — but he admitted that they were faithful
indexes to the character of the pieces. The
clearest tokens of the same source of inspiration
may be found in his Fantasie, op. 1 7, which bears
as its motto a verse from Schlegel. In the last
part a deeply moving effect is produced by
the abrupt change of key in the arpeggios from
the chords of C to A and then to F. But changes
of key were not his only resource for the produc
tion of romantic effects. Excepting Beethoven,
none have illustrated the power of rhythm so
well as Schumann. He often imparts a strange
and entirely novel significance to commonplace
or familiar phrases by syncopated notes, by
putting the emphasis on the weak part of the bar,
or by accents so marked as to give the impres
sion of a simultaneous combination of triple and
common time. These strong and eccentric
rhythms appear in all his works ; and the frequent
directions Marcato assai or Molto marcato show
what stress he laid upon emphasis. The influence
of Jean Paul may be traced also in Schumann's
sometimes grave and sometimes playful humour.
Many of his pianoforte pieces are marked mit
Humor or mit vielem Humor. And in this re
spect he is inferior only to Beethoven, of whose
'romantic humour' he so often speaks in his
'Gesammelte Schriften.' The romantic bias of
Schumann's mind was not less evident in his
treatment of Oriental subjects. The colouring
of his ' Paradise and the Peri,' and of his
' Oriental Pictures ' (Bilder aus Osten), is vividly
local. And of his songs we may cite the
' Waldesgesprach' (Op. 39, No. 3) as an example
of the purest essence of romance. Full as the
poem is in itself of romantic feeling and ex
pression, the music interprets the words, rather
than the words interpret the music.
The romantic spirit found a less congenial
abode in the happy, equable disposition, and
carefully disciplined imagination of Mendels
sohn ; but his genius was too sensitive and deli
cate to remain unaffected by the main currents
ROMANTIC.
151
of his age.1 Take, for example, the first four
chords in the overture to 'A Midsummer Night's
Dream.' And could it indeed be possible to
illustrate Shakespeare's romantic play in music
with fuller success than Mendelssohn has done ?
The overtures 'The Hebrides,' 'The Lovely
Melusine,' and 'Calm Sea and Prosperous Voyage,'
are likewise full of the brightest qualities of
romanticism.
Not unlike Mendelssohn was William Sterndale
Bennett ; and the points of resemblance between
them were strict regard to form, clearness of
poetic thought, and cultivated refinement of taste.
Romantic too Bennett certainly was ; as may at
once be seen in his overtures, ' The Naiads ' and
'The Wood Nymphs.' So tranquil, clear and
perfect in detail are most of Bennett's com
positions, so delicate was the touch which
fashioned them, that they have been likened to
the landscapes of Claude Lorraine : and in
illustration of what is meant, we may mention
his ' Three Musical Sketches,' op. 10 (' The Lake,
the Millstream and the Fountain'). Yet there
were rare moments when Bennett's habitual
reserve relaxed, and the veil was lifted from his
inner nature. To the inspiration of such moments
we may ascribe parts of his G minor Symphony,
and above all his beautiful ' Paradise and the
Peri ' overture. His ' Parisina' overture betrays
the latent fire which burned beneath a wontedly
calm surface, and many romantic passages
might be pointed out in it. One such is to be
found at the beginning of the working out, where
the theme, which before was in Fjf minor and
the very soul of melancholy —
K S
-
- _ .
2Z] 3
li-
«/
*^^
f
•--^M^-ej^
, I f^
1 !
1 4
fes r^
1 t:
1
3 r
•^. •
I
is now given in A major, the CjJ of the cadence
seeming for the moment to brighten it as with
the inspiration of hope —
^J^-
-- —
— • —
—
— . —
w^
i=
«J
^"^_^
r
f -\. ^ tf
ft
\fSf
:p|L^
^N
^
iJE
L_T-
— ^
,^^.
-4-
Notice of the modern German composers on
whom the stamp of Schumann is so unmistake-
able, would lead us too far. Wagner we pass by,
because he can hardly be counted among the
followers of the romantic school, and we could
not, within the limits of this article, show the
points wherein he differs from former romanticists;
1 In describing to Eeichardt's daughter the success of her father's
' Morgengesang ' at the Khiue Festival, Mendelssohn adds : ' at the
words Und schlich in dieser Nacht the music becomes so romantic
and poetical that every time I hear it, I am more touched and
charmed.'
152
EOMANTIC.
but mention is made under ORCHESTRATION
of some of the beautiful and truly romantic
effects which he knows how to produce in his
instrumentation. [See also OPERA, and WAGNER.]
We may however designate one of the greatest
living composers as one of the greatest living
romanticists ; and it is no disparagement to the
individuality of Johannes Brahms to say that he
is in many respects the disciple of Schubert and
Schumann. The romanticism of such productions
as the beautiful romances from Tieck's ' Magelone'
(op. 33) or the cantata ' Rinaldo' (op. 50) is of
course visible at a glance, but Brahms's roman
ticism generally lies too deep to be discovered with
out attentive and sympathetic study. As a rule,
he is more concerned to satisfy the judgment than
kindle the imagination, more anxious to move the
heart than please the ear. Close observation will
often find an adequate reason and justification for
seeming harshnesses in Brahms's works, and re
flective familiarity with them will, in the same
way, surely discover the genuine romantic spirit in
passages where its presence would wholly escape
the unpractised eye and ear.
Chopin holds a solitary position in romantic
art. No school can claim him wholly for its
own, and the best poetic gifts of the French,
German, and Sclavonic nationalities were united
in him. Chopin, says Liszt, refused to be bound
by deference to rules which fettered the play of
his imagination, simply because they had been
accepted as classical. But the classic training
and solid studies of his youth, combined with his
exquisite taste and innate refinement, preserved
him from abuse of the liberty which he was
determined to enjoy. The mental atmosphere of
his life in Paris may be felt in his works. In
hatred of whatever was commonplace and
ordinary, he was one with the French romantic
school ; but unlike them he would allow nothing,
whose only merit was originality, to stand in his
compositions. Beauty there must always be to
satisfy him ; and he would have recoiled from
the crudities and barbarisms which disfigure some
works of the French romantic period. So uni
formly romantic was Chopin in every stage of
his career, that it would be impossible to illustrate
this quality of his music by extracts.
The French romantic school of literature was
of later date than the German, and was con
siderably affected by it. The general features
of the two schools were very similar, but the
French authors wrote even more than the Ger
man in the mediaeval and mystic vein, and were
more prone to unhealthy exaggeration. In France,
moreover, the antagonism between the romantic
and classical schools was carried to a pitch which
had no parallel in Germany. The completeness
and universality of the empire which classic ex
ample and tradition had gained over the educated
public of France, intensified the revolt against
them, when at last it arrived. The revolt was
as widespread as it was uncompromising : there
was not a field of art or literature in which the
rebel flag of the new school was not unfurled,
and a revolutionary temper, inflamed perhaps by
EOMANTIC.
the political storms of that time, was manifest in
i all that they did. In the false simplicity and
sickly sentimentality, in the stilted diction and
threadbare forms of expression affected by the
reigning school, the insurgent authors had indeed
much to provoke them. But in the vehemence
of their reaction against such faults they were
apt to fall into an opposite extreme; and thus,
finish of form, clearness of outline, and coherent
sequence of thought are too often absent from
their works.
With respect to music, Berlioz is the typical
name of the renaissance of 1830 ; but Liszt, on
whom the French school exercised so strong an
influence, may be associated with him. So far
were these composers and their countless fol
lowers borne by the revolutionary impulse, that
they did not shrink at times from a total rejection
of the old traditional forms in their instrumental
music ; but it cannot be said that very valuable
results were obtained by their hardihood. They
chose indeed romantic subjects for musical repre
sentation, as Weber and Schumann had done, but
there the resemblance ceased. They aimed not,
as the earlier masters did, to reproduce the feel
ings stirred in them by external objects, but
rather to present the objects themselves to the
minds of an audience ; and an undoubted loss
of romantic effect was the consequence of their
innovation. But while we cannot acquit the
younger romanticists of the charge of an exces
sive realism, which too readily sacrificed artistic
beauty to originality and vivid representation,
nor deny the frequent obscurity and incoherence
of their compositions, we are unable to acquiesce
in the imputation so often fastened upon them
that their romanticism was merely the veil of
ignorance, and that they violated rules because
they knew no better. As a matter of fact, even
those among them who pushed extravagance to
the farthest point were thorough masters of the
strictest rules and severest forms of musical com
position.
To sum up, in conclusion, our obligations to
the romantic school, we must acknowledge that
they saved music from the danger with which it
was at one time threatened of being treated as
an exact but dry and cold science ; that they
gave it a freer and more elastic form ; that they
developed the capabilities and technique of
various instruments ; that being themselves
always filled with a deep reverence for their own
art they rescued from unmerited neglect some of
the finest works of earlier composers ; and that by
their own genius and labour they have added
many a noble masterpiece to the treasures of
music.1 [A.H.W.]
1 For the foregoing article the following works have been consulted :
—Schumann, ' Gesammelte Schritten ' ; Liszt, 'Chopin'; Hostinsky,
' Die Lehre der formalen Aesthetik ' ; Kiister. ' Populare Vortrage ' ;
La Mara, ' Musikalische Studien-ko'pfe' ; Wasielewski, 'Schumann';
Weber, Max v., ' C. M. v. Weber ' ; Hoffmann, ' Kreisleriana ' ; Gautier,
'Histoire du Romantisme' ; N. Zeitschrift f. Musik, 1834-1839 ; Riehl,
' Charakterkdpfe ' ; Brockhaus, ' Conversationslexicon' ; Eckermann,
'Gespruche mit Goethe'; Mendel, 'Lexicon' ; Brendel, 'Geschichte
der Musik ' ; Marx, ' Musik des Neunzehnteu Jahrhunderts' ; KOstlin,
• Geschichte der Musik ' ; Weitzmann, ' Geschichte des Glavierspiels ' ;
Reissmann, ' Von Bach bis Waguer ' ; Letters from Dr. Zopff and Dr.
Ludwig.
ROMBERG.
ROMBERG. One of those musical families of •
whom, from the Bachs downwards, so many are ,
encountered in Germany. The founders were
ANTON and HEINRICH, a pair of inseparable
brothers, who dressed alike, and lived together in
Bonn. They were still alive in 1792. Another
ANTON, a bassoon-player, born in Westphalia in
1745, lived at Dinklage (Duchy of Oldenburg),
gave concerts at Hamburg, and died in 1812,
living long enough to play a concerto for two
bassoons with his youngest son ANTON, born 17/7.
His eldest son, BERNHARD, born Nov. 1 1, 1 767, at
Dinklage, is justly regarded as head of the school
of German violoncellists. When only fourteen he
attracted considerable attention in Paris during
a visit there with his father; from 1790 to 1793
he was in the band of the Elector of Cologne at
Bonn, at the same time with Ferdinand Ries,
Reicha and the two Beethovens. During the
French invasion he occupied himself in a profes
sional tour in Italy, Spain, and Portugal, and was
well received, especially in Madrid, where Ferdi
nand VII. accompanied him on the violin. His
cousin Andreas went with him, and on their return
through Vienna late in 1796, they gave a con
cert at which Beethoven played (Thayer, ii. 16).
After his return Bernhard married Catherine
Ramcke at Hamburg. From 1801 to 1803 he
was a professor in the Paris Conservatoire, and
we next find him in the King's band at Berlin.
Spohr (Autob. i. 78) met him there at the end
of 1 804, and played quartets with him. Perhaps
the most remarkable fact he mentions is that
after one of Beethoven's early quartets (op. 18)
Romberg asked how Spohr could play 'such
absurd stuff' (barockes Zeug). It is of a piece
with the well-known anecdote of his tearing the
copy of the first Rasoumowsky quartet from the
stand and trampling on it.
The approach of the French forces in 1 806 again
drove Romberg on the world, and in 1807 he was
travelling in South Russia, but returned to Berlin,
and was Court-Capellmeister till 1817, when he
retired into private life at Hamburg. In 1822
he went to Vienna, in 1825 to St. Petersburg
and Moscow, and in 1839 to x London, and Paris,
where his Method for the cello (Berlin, Trautwein,
1 840) was adopted by the Conservatoire. He died
at Hamburg, August 13, 1841.
The great importance of B. Romberg both as
composer and executant arises from the fact that
he materially extended the capabilities of the
violoncello. His celebrated concertos may be
said to contain implicitly a complete theory
of cello playing, and there are few passages
known to modern players the type of which may
[ not be found there. Probably no better know
ledge of the fingerboard could be gained than
by studying these concertos. Although they are
now seldom played in public, being somewhat
too old-fashioned to hit the taste of modern
artists and audiences, they are yet of considerable
merit as compositions, and contain passages of
1 He does not seem to have played in London ; but a slight trace of
As presence is perhaps discoverable in an overture of his nephew's,
which closes the Philharmonic programme ot June 17, 1839.
ROMBERG.
153
distinct grace and charm. There is probably no
means now of learning at first hand what Rom-
berg's own playing was like. But it may be
gathered from the character of his compositions,
that his tone was not so full and powerful as
that of artists who confined themselves more to
the lower register of the instrument, and to pas
sages of less complication. As an indication that
this view agrees with that which prevailed during
his lifetime, we find him for instance spoken of
as follows by a correspondent of the Allgemeine
Musikalische Zeitung for 1817, who had heard
him play at Amsterdam: — 'The visit of B. Rom
berg had long been eagerly looked for. The
immense reputation which preceded him, caused
his first concert to be crowded to excess. He
played a concerto (die Reise auf den Bernhards-
berg) and a capriccio on Swedish national airs.
In regard to the perfection and taste of his per
formance, to the complete ease and lightness of
his playing, our great expectations were far ex
ceeded — but not so in respect of tone — this, espe
cially in difficult passages, we found much weaker
than the powerful tone of our own Rauppe, and
indeed scarcely to compare with it.' At a second
concert Romberg played his well-known Military
Concerto, and the same view was reiterated.
Bernhard Romberg composed cello solos of vari
ous kinds; string quartets; PF. quartets; a funeral
symphony for Queen Louise of Prussia; a concerto
for 2 cellos (Breitkopf & Ha'rtel), his last work ;
and operas — 'Die wiedergefundene Statue,' words
by Gozzi von Sch wick (1790), and 'DerSchiffbrueh'
(1791, Bonn), 'Don Mendoce,' with his cousin
Andreas (Paris), 'Alma,' 'Ulysses und Circe'
(July 27, 1807), and ' Rittertreue,' 3 acts (Jan.
31, 1817, Berlin). His son KARL, also a cellist,
born at St. Petersburg Jan. 17, 1811, played in
the court-band there from 1832 to 1842, and
afterwards lived at Vienna.
Anton Romberg the younger had a brother
GERHARD HEINRICH, born 1748, a clarinet-
player, and Musikdirector at Miinster, who
lived with him for some time at Bonn, and
had several children, of whom the most cele
brated was ANDREAS, a violinist, born April 27,
1767, at Vechte, near Miinster. When only
seven he played in public with his cousin Bern-
hard, with whom he remained throughout life
on terms of the closest friendship. At seventeen
he excited great enthusiasm in Paris, and was
engaged for the Concerts Spirituels (1/84). In
1790 he joined his cousin at Bonn, played the
violin in the Elector's band, and accompanied him
to Italy in 1793. In Rome they gave a concert
at the Capitol (Feb. 17, 1796) under the patron
age of Cardinal Rezzonico. Andreas then made
some stay in Vienna, where Haydn showed great
interest in his first quartet. In 179 7 he went to
Hamburg, and in 1 798 made a tour alone. In
1800 he followed Bernhard to Paris, and com
posed with him 'Don Mendoce, ou le Tuteur
portugais.' The opera failed, and the success of
their concerts was but partial, so Andreas left
for Hamburg, where he married, and remained
for fifteen yeurs. He next became Coui't-Capell-
154
ROMBERG.
meister at Gotha, where he died, in very great
destitution, Nov. 10, 18-21. Concerts were given
in various towns for the benefit of his widow and
children. The university of Kiel gave him a
degree of Doctor of Music. He composed six
symphonies, quartets, quintets, church music ; a
Te Deum, Psalms, a Dixit, Magnificat, and
Hallelujah, in 4, 5, 8 and 16 parts; several
operas — 'Das graue Ungeheuer ' (1790, Bonn),
'Die Macht derMusik' (1791), 'Der Rabe,' ope
retta (1792), 'Die Grossmuth des Scipio,' and
'Die Ruinen zu Paluzzi,' — the two last not per
formed. His best-known work is the music for
Schiller's ' Song of the Bell,' which still keeps its
place in concert programmes. His music is solid,
but not original, being too closely modelled on
Mozart. His larger works are well-known in
England. The Lay of the Bell was, in the early
days of the Choral Harmonists' Society, to be often
found in its programmes, and is still occasionally
heard. That, with ' The Transient and the Eter
nal,' ' The Harmony of the Spheres,' ' The Power
of Song,' and a Te Deum (in D), are all pub
lished with English words by Novellos. His
Toy- symphony is now and then played as an
alternative to Haydn's, and was chosen for per
formance by an extraordinary company, em
bracing most of the great artists of London, May
14, 1880. Two sons, CIPKIANO and HEINKICH are
mentioned in the Allg. musikalische Zeitung.
Andreas's brother BALTHASAR, born 1775, and
educated for a cellist, died aged seventeen. His
sister THERESE, born 1781, had a considerable
reputation as a pianist. [F.G.]
ROMEO AND JULIET. A subject often set
by opera composers ; e. g. —
1. Romeo et Juliette; 3 acts; words by de
Se'gur, music by Steibelt. Feydeau, Paris, Sept.
io, 1793.
2. ' Giulietta e Romeo.' Opera seria In 3 acts,
by Zingarelli. Produced at the Scala, Milan,
Carnival, 1796. It was one of Napoleon's favour
ite operas, when Crescentini sang in it.
3. 'Giulietta e Romeo,' by Vaccaj. Produced
at the Scala, Milan, spring of 1826 ; King's
Theatre, London, April io, 1832.
4. ' I Capuletti ed i Montecchi,' in 3 acts ;
libretto by Romani, music by Bellini. Produced
at Venice, March 12,1 830. It was written for
the two Grisis and Rubini. King's Theatre,
London, July 20, 1833.
5. 'Romeo et Juliette,' in 5 acts; words by
Barbier and Carre, music by Gounod. Produced
at theThdatreLyrique, April27,iS67. In London,
at Covent Garden, in Italian, July u, 1867.
6. In addition to these it has been made the
subject of a work by Berlioz, his 5th Symphony —
'Rome'o et Juliette. Symphonic dramatique, avec
choeurs, solos de chant, et prologue en re'citatif
choral, op. 17.' Dedicated to Paganini. The words
are Berlioz's own, versified by Emil Deschamps.
It was composed in 1839, and performed three
times consecutively at the Conservatoire. la
England the First Part (4 numbers) was executed
\mder M. Berlioz's direction at the New Phil
harmonic Concerts of March 24, and April 28,
RONCONI.
1852, and the entire work by the Philharmonic
Society (Cusins) March io, 1881. [G.J
ROMER, EMMA, soprano singer, pupil of Sir
George Smart, born in 1814, made her first
appearance at Covent Garden Oct. 16, 1830, as
, Clara in ' The Duenna.' She met with a favour
able reception, and for several years filled the
position of prima donna at Covent Garden, the
English Opera House, and Drury Lane, with
great credit. In 1852 she took the management
of the Surrey Theatre, with a company con-
i taining Miss Poole and other good singers, and
brought out a series of operas in English. Miss
Homer was rarely heard in the concert-room,
but appeared at the Westminster Abbey Festival
in 1834. She was the original singer of the
title-parts in Barnett's ' Mountain Sylph' and
'Fair Rosamond.' Her performance of Amina
in the English version of Bellini's 'Sonnambula'
was much admired. She married a Mr. Almond,
and died at Margate, April n, 1868. [W.H.H.]
RONCONI, a family of distinguished singers.
DOMENICO, a tenor, was born July II, 1772,
at Lendinara-di-Polesine in Venetia. He first
appeared on the stage in 1797 at La Fenice,
Venice, and obtained great renown both as a
singer and actor, there and in other Italian cities.
He sang in Italian opera at St. Petersburg and
Munich, and afterwards became a professor of
singing at the Conservatoires in those cities, and
at Milan, where he died, April 13, 1839. Of Ms
three sons,
FELICE, born in 1811, at Venice, under the
direction of his father devoted himself to in
struction in singing, and became a professor in
1837 at Wurzburg, at Frankfort, and, in 1844-8,
at Milan. He was similarly engaged for some years
in London, and finally at St. Petersburg, where
he died Sept. io, 1875. He was the author of a
Method of teaching singing, and of several songs,
His second brother,
GIORGIO, the celebrated baritone, was born at
Milan, Aug. 6, 1810. He received instruction in
singing from his father, and began his dramatic
career in 1831, at Pavia, as Arturo in 'La
Straniera,' He played in some of the small
Italian cities, then at Rome, where Donizetti
wrote for him 'II Furioso,' 'Torquato Tasso,'
and 'Maria di Rohan/ in which last, as Due de
Chevreuse, he obtained one of his greatest
triumphs- — also at Turin, Florence, Naples, etc. In
the last city Ronconi was married, Oct. 18, 1837.
to Signorina Giovannina Giannoni, a singer who
had played in London the previous year, in
opera-buffa at the St. James's Theatre. He
began his career in England at Her Majesty's,
April 9, 1842, as 'Enrico' in Lucia, and was
well received during the season in that character
and in those of Filippo (Beatrice di Tenda),
Belcore (L'Elisir), Basilio, Riccardo (Puritani),
Tasso, etc. In the last opera his wife played
with him, but neither then, nor five years later
as Maria di Rohan, did she make the least im
pression on the English public. He then made a
provincial tour with her, Thalberg, and John
Parry. In the winter he played at the ' Italians,'
RONCONI.
Paris, with such success that he was engaged
there for several subsequent seasons, and at one
time was manager of the theatre, and was also
engaged at Vienna, Pesth, Madrid (where he was
manager), Barcelona and Naples. He reappeared
in England April 13, 1847, a^ Co vent Garden,
as Enrico, and also played Figaro (Barbiere),
May 8, De Chevreuse on the production in
England of ' Maria di Rohan,' and the Doge
on the production of Verdi's ' I due Foscari,'
June 19, in which 'by his dignity and force he
saved the opera . . . from utter condemnation*
(Chorley). ' There are few instances of a voice
so limited in compass (hardly exceeding an
octave), so inferior in quality, so weak, so
habitually out of tune The low stature,
the features, unmarked and commonplace when
silent, promising nothing -to an audience, yet
which could express a dignity of bearing, a
tragic passion not to be exceeded, or an exu
berance of the wildest, quaintest, most whimsical,
most spontaneous comedy These things
we have seen, and have forgotten personal insigni
ficance, vocal power beyond mediocrity, every
disqualification, in the spell of strong, real sensi
bility ' (Ib.). There have been few such examples
of terrible courtly tragedy as ' Signor Ronconi's
Chevreuse — the polished demeanour of his earlier
scenes giving a fearful force of contrast to the
latter ones . . . . ' (Ib.) He sang at the Italian
Opera every season until 1866 inclusive ex
cepting 1855 and 62, in all the great comic
operas, as Don Juan, Leporello, Masetto, Na-
bucco, Faust (Spohr), Rigoletto, Lord Allcash
(Fra Diavolo), Dandolo (Zampa), Barberino
(Stradella), and Crispino (Crispino e la Comare),
etc. In the last six parts he was the original
interpreter at the Italian Opera, and in many
of the.se, such as Rigoletto, the Lord, Figaro,
and the Podesta (LaGazza) of Rossini, and those
of Donizetti he remained a favourite. Of his
classical parts, his Don Juan alone was a dis
appointment. He afterwards went to America,
and remained there some time, well received.
He returned to Europe in 1874, and was ap
pointed a teacher of singing at the Conservatorio
at Madrid, which post he still holds. Some years
previously he founded a school of singing at
Uranada.1
SEBASTIANO, the other son, also a baritone,
born May 1814, at Venice, received instruction
from his father and the elder Romani, and made
his first appearance in 1836, at Teatro Pantera,
Lucca, as Torquato Tasso, in which part through
out his career he made one of his greatest successes.
He enjoyed considerable popularity in his own
country, at Vienna, and in Spain, Portugal, and
• America, as an able artist in the same line of
parts as his brother — unlike him in personal
appearance, being a tall thin man, but like him
in the capability of his face for great variety
of expression. He appeared in England in 1860
at Her Majesty's, and was fairly well received as
Rigolelto (in which he made his de"but, May 1 2th),
l Not Cordova, as according to Ft:tis.
RONDO.
155
Masetto, and Griletto (Prova d'un Opera Seria).
He retired from public life after a career of 35
years, and is at the present time a, teacher of
singing at Milan.2 [A.C.]
RONDEAU. The French name for a short
poem of six or eight lines, containing but
two rhymes, and so contrived that the open
ing and closing lines were identical, thus form
ing as it were a circle or round. The name
has come to be used in music for a movement
constructed on a somewhat corresponding plan.
[See RONDO.] [G.]
RONDO (Fr. Eondeau). A piece of music
having one principal subject, to which a return
is always made after the introduction of other
matter, so as to give a symmetrical or rounded
form to the whole.
From the simplicity and obviousness of this
idea it will be readily understood that the Rondo-
form was the earliest and most frequent definite
mould for musical construction. For a full tracing
of this point see FORM [i. 541, 552]. In fact the
First Movement and the Rondo are the two
principal types of Form, modifications of the
Rondo serving as the skeleton for nearly every
piece or song now written. Dr. Marx ('Allge-
meine Musiklehre') distinguishes five forms of
Rondo, but his description is involved, and,
in the absence of any acknowledged authority
for these distinctions, scarcely justifiable.
Starting with a principal subject of definite
form and length, the first idea naturally was to
preserve this unchanged in key or form through
the piece. Hence a decided melody of eight or
sixteen bars was chosen, ending with a full close
in the tonic. After a rambling excursion through
several keys and with no particular object, the
principal subject was regained and an agreeable
sense of contrast attained. Later on there grew
out of the free section a second subject in a re
lated key, and still later a third, which allowed
the second to be repeated in the tonic. This
variety closely resembles the first-movement
form, the third subject taking the place of the
development of subjects, which is rare in a
Rondo. The chief difference lies in the return
to the first subject immediately after the second,
which is the invariable characteristic of the
Rondo. The first of these classes is the Rondo
from Couperin to Haydn, the second and third
that of Mozart and Beethoven. The fully deve
loped Rondo-form of Beethoven and the modern
composers may be thus tabulated :—
' Coda'
In the case of a Rondo in a minor key, the second
subject would naturally be in. the relative major
instead of in the dominant.
One example — perhaps the clearest as well
as the best known in all music — will suffice to
make this plan understood by the untechnical
reader. Taking the Rondo of Beethoven's
2 We are indebted to him aod Mr. J. C. Griffith for much of the
above iutormauuu with regard to his family.
156
RONDO.
RONDO.
'Sonata Pathetique ' (op. 13) we find the first ' the Rondo of the Sonata in A (op. 2, No. 2), the
subject in C minor : —
this is of 1 7| bars in length and ends with a full
close in the key. Six bars follow, modulating
into Eb, where we find the second subject, which
is of unusual proportions compared with the first,
consisting as it does of three separate themes : —
etc.
etc.
After this we return to the ist subject, which
ends just as before. A new start is then made with
a third subject (or pair of subjects ?) in Ab : —
this material is worked out for 24 bars and
leads to a prolonged passage on a chord of the
dominant seventh on G, which heightens the
expectation of the return of the ist subject by
delaying it. On its third appearance it is not
played quite to the end, but we are skilfully led
away, the bass taking the theme, till, in the
short space of four bars, we find the whole of the
2nd subject reappearing in C major. Then,
as this is somewhat long, the 1st subject conies
in again for the fourth time and a Coda formed
from the 2nd section of the 2nd subject concludes
the Rondo with still another 'positively last
appearance ' of No. i .
Beethoven's Rondos will all be found to present
but slight modifications of the above form. Some
times a ' working-out ' or developznent of the
2nd subject will take the place of the 3rd
subject, as in the Sonata in E (op. 90), but in
every case the principal subject will be presented
in its entirety at least three times. But as this
was apt to lead to monotony — especially in the
case of a long subject like that in the Sonata
just quoted— Beethoven introduced the plan of
varying the theme slightly on each repetition, or
of breaking off in the middle. It is in such
delicate and artistic modifications and improve
ments as these that the true genius shows itself,
and not in the complete abandonment of old
rules. In the earliest example we can take
form of the opening arpeggio is altered on every
recurrence, while the simple phrase of the third
and fourth bars
lent
' •
is thus varied : —
In the Rondo of the Sonata in E b (op. 7) again,
we find the main subject cut short on its second
appearance, while on its final repetition all sorts
of liberties are taken with it ; it is played an
octave higher than its normal place, a free varia
tion is made on it, and at last we are startled by
its being thrust into a distant key — EJJ. This
last effect has been boldly pilfered by many a
composer since — Chopin in the Rondo of his
E minor Pianoforte Concerto, for instance. It is
needless to multiply examples : Beethoven shows
in each successive work how this apparently stiff
and rigid form can be invested with infinite
variety and interest; he always contradicted the
idea (in which too few have followed him)
that a Rondo was bound in duty to be an
8-bar subject in 2-4 time, of one unvarying,
jaunty, and exasperatingly jocose character. The
Rondo of the Eb Sonata is most touchingly
melancholy, so is that to the Sonata in E (op. 90),
not to mention many others. There will always
remain a certain stiffness in this form, owing to
the usual separation of the subject from its sur
roundings by a full close. When this is dispensed
with, the piece is said to be in Rondo-form, but
is not called a Rondo (e.g. the last movement of
Beethoven's Sonata op. i, No. 3).
Modern composers, like Chopin, with whom
construction was not a strong point, often omit
the central section, or third subject, together with
the repetition of the first subject which accom
panies it, and thus what they call a Rondo is
merely a piece on the plan of a French overture;
that is to say, having produced all his material
in the first half of the piece, the composer repeats
the whole unchanged, save that such portions as
were in the Dominant are, in the repetition,
given in the Tonic. Chopin's ' Rondeau brill-
ante' in Eb, the 'Adieu a Varsovie' — indeed all
his Rondos — show this construction, or rather,
want of construction. [F.C.]
PvONZI.
RONZI. [See BEGNIS, DE.]
ROOKE, WILLIAM MICHAEL, son of John
Rourke, a Dublin tradesman, was born in South
Great George's Street, Dublin, Sept. 29, 1 794. His
bent for rnusic, which displayed itself at an early
age, was sternly discouraged by his father, who
wished him to follow his own avocation, but
before he was sixteen, he was, by his father's
death, left free to follow his own inclination.
He studied, almost unaided, so assiduously, that
in 1813 he took to music as a profession, learned
counterpoint under Dr. Cogan, a Dublin professor,
and became a teacher of the violin and piano
forte. Among his pupils on the former in
strument was Ealfe, then a boy. In 1817
he was appointed chorus-master and deputy
leader at the theatre in Crow Street, Dublin,
and soon afterwards composed a polacca, ' Oh
Glory, in thy brightest hour,' which was sung
b}7 Braham, and met with great approbation. A
few years later he removed to England. In 1826
he was leading oratorios at Birmingham, and in
the same year came to London, and sought the
appointment of chorus-master at Drury Lane, and
established himself as a teacher of singing. About
this period he composed his opera, ' Amilie, or
The Love Test,' which, after he had waited
many years for an opportunity of producing it,
was brought out at Covent Garden, Dec. 2, 1837,
with decided success, and at once established his
reputation as a composer of marked ability. He
immediately commenced the composition of a
second opera, and on May 2, 1839 produced at
Covent Garden ' Henrique, or, The Love Pilgrim,'
which although most favourably received, was
withdrawn after five performances on account of
a misunderstanding with the manager. He com
posed a third opera entitled ' Cagliostro,' which has
never been performed. He died Oct. 14, 1847, and
was buried in Brompton Cemetery. [W.H.H.]
ROOT. The classification of the chords which
form the structural material of modern harmonic
music is attained by referring them to what are
called their roots ; and it is mainly by their use
that these harmonic elements are brought within
the domain of intelligible order.
As long as the purely polyphonic system was
in full force, the chordal combinations were merely
classified according to recognized degrees of con
sonance and dissonance, without any clear idea
of relationship : but as that system merged by
degrees into the harmonic system, it was found
that fresh principles of classification were in
dispensable ; and that many combinations which
at first might appear to have quite a distinct
character must somehow be recognised as having
a common centre. This centre was found in an
ultimate bass note, namely, the bass note of the
complete chord in. what would be considered its
natural or first position ; and this was called the
Root, and served as the common indicator of all
the various portions of the complete chord which
could be detached, and their test of closest pos
sible relationship. Further, these roots were
themselves classified according to their status in
any given key ; and by this means a group of
ROOT.
157
chords which were related to one another most
closely by having the same root, might be shown
to be related severally and collectively to the
group which belonged to another root ; and the
degree of relationship could be easily and clearly
ascertained according to the known nearness or
remoteness of the roots in question. By this
means the whole harmonic basis of a piece of
music can be tested ; and it must be further
noted that it is only by such means that the
structural principles of that kind of music which
has been called 'absolute' because of its dis
sociation from words, is rendered abstractedly
intelligible.
The principle upon which modern Instrumental
Music has been developed is that a succession of
distinct tunes or recognizable sections of melody
or figures can be associated by the orderly distri
bution of harmonies and keys in such a manner
that the mind can realise the concatenation as a
complete and distinct work of art. It is obvious
that fine melodic material is a vital point ; but
it is not so obvious that where the dimensions of
the work are such that a continuous flow of
melody of a uniform character is impossible, the
orderly arrangement of the materials in suc
cessions of keys and harmonies is no less vital.
The harmonic structure requires to be clearly
ascertainable in works of art which are felt to
be masterpieces of form, and to be perfectly
understood and felt by those who attempt to
follow such models : hence, in discussing the
structure of works of this kind, the frequent
use of such terms as Tonic, or Dominant or Sub-
dominant harmony, which is only a short way
of describing harmony of which these respective
notes are the roots.
The simplest and most stable of complete com
binations in music are the chords consisting of
a bass note with its third and perfect fifth ; and
of these the bass note is considered the root.
In most cases such a root is held to be the funda
mental sound of the series of harmonics which
an essential chord may be taken to represent.
For instance, the chord of the major third and
perfect fifth on any note is supposed to represent
the ground tone or generator with two of its
most distinct and characteristic lower harmonics;
and whatever be the positions of the individual
notes in respect of one another, they are
still referred to this ground-tone as a root.
Thus the chord GBD (a) would be taken
-C2.
158
ROOT.
to be the representative of the ground-tone
G with its second and fourth harmonics (6);
and every transposition or 'inversion' of the
same notes, such as BDG, or DGB in close or
open order (as in c), or even lesser portions
to which the implication of a context would
afford a clue, would be referred alike to this
same root. If F be added (d) to the above
chord it may be taken to represent the sixth
harmonic (6\ and similar 'inversions' of the
component portions of the chord will similarly
be referred to the note G. If A be added further
above the F of the preceding chord, producing
G B D F A (as in e), that is commonly taken as a
yet more complete representation of the group
of harmonics generated by the sounding of G,
of which it is the eighth; and, as before, all the
different portions which could be intelligibly
isolated, and all the transpositions of its component
notes, would be still referable to the one root G.
If Ab had been taken instead of Afl, the same
general explanation would hold good, though
the special question might remain open whether
it was a representative of the i6th harmonic,
which is four octaves from the fundamental sound,
or an artificial softening of the clear and strong
major ninth, At]. Some theorists carry the same
principles yet further, and include the C above
A, and even the E and Eb above that in the
group which represents the harmonic series of
G, calling them respectively the eleventh and
major and minor thirteenths of that note.
The discords contained in the above series are
frequently styled fundamental, from this sup
posed representation of the group of harmonics
generated by their fundamental or root note ;
they are characterised among discords by the
peculiar freedom of the notes of which they are
composed, on both sides. It will be observed
that they are all members of the Diatonic series
of the key of C, major or minor ; and as G, their
root note, is the Dominant of that key, they re
present the scope of what is called the Dominant
harmony of C, which of course has its counter
part in every other key. No other note than
the Dominant serves to this extent as the root
of chords of this class which are Diatonic. The
Tonic, for instance, can only supply the third and
fifth, and even the minor seventh is a chromatic
note. Nevertheless this chromatic chord and the
ninths which are built upon it are commonly
used as if they belonged to the key of C ; and the
same remark applies to the similar discords
founded on the Supertonic root (as D in the key
of C) ; and these are most readily intelligible
through their close connection as Dominant har
mony to the Dominant of C.
The roots of the various combinations which
are arrived at by modifying the intervals of such
distinct and essential harmonies as the above, are
of course the same as those of the unmodified
harmonies. Thus the roots of suspensions are
the same as those of the harmonies upon which
they are said to resolve, because they are modifi
cations of that which follows in its complete
state, and not of that which precedes ; and the
ROOT.
same applies to the combinations produced by
adventitious notes, such as appoggiaturas and
the like.
The combinations which arise from the simul
taneous occurrence of ordinary passing notes must
find their root in the chord which precedes, as
that has possession of the field till new harmony
presents itself.
From these considerations it will be obvious
that a very considerable variety of apparently
different combinations are referable to a single
root. In fact a great portion of music is built
upon very few roots ; many examples of good
popular music especially do not exceed the limits
of Tonic and Dominant harmony with an occa
sional move as far as the Sub-dominant, and
next to no modulation. Even in works which
belong to the domain sometimes distinguished as
high art a great deal is often done within very
narrow limits. For instance, the whole of the
first section of a violin and pianoforte sonata of
Mozart's in A is based on six successive alterna
tions of Tonic and Dominant harmony, and
modulation to the new key for the second section
is effected merely by the Dominant and Tonic
harmony of that key.
Notwithstanding the importance which attaches
to a clear understanding of the classification of
chords according to their roots, there are some
combinations upon whose derivation doctors dis
agree ; and it must be confessed that the theory
of music is yet far from that complete and settled
sta.oe which would admit any hope of a decisive
verdict in the matter at present. In such cir
cumstances variety of opinion is not only inevit
able but desirable ; and though the multitude of
counsellors is a little bewildering there are
consolations ; for it happens fortunately that
these differences of opinion are not vital. Such
chords, for instance, as augmented sixths have
so marked and immediate a connection with
the most prominent harmonies in the key, that
the ascertainment of their roots becomes of
secondary importance ; and even with the chord
D)
C
which stands as A > in the key of C for instance
(
F J
(/), it is not so indispensable to decide
whether G or F or D is the root, or whether
indeed it is even a double-rooted chord, because,
among other reasons, the very attention which
has been called to it and the very character
istics which have made it difficult to classify
have given it a prominence and a unique indi
viduality which relieves it of the need of being
assigned to any category ; and even when it IB
an important factor in the harmonic structure,
the process of analysis need not be rendered
doubtful because its actual position in the key is
so thoroughly realised. Other disputed points
there are having reference to roots, which are
even of less importance. For instance, whether
what is called an augmented fifth is really
an augmented fifth or a minor thirteenth ; or
whether the augmented octave which Mozart
BOOT.
ROSA.
159
uses with such marked emphasis in the 3rd bar
of the Allegro in the overture to Don Giovanni
is properly a minor ninth, as some maintain —
since happily the roots would be the same in
both cases. ' [C.H.H.P.J
RORE, CIPRTANO DI, composer of the Venetian
school, born at Mechlin in 1516. He studied
under Willaert,1 chapel-master of St. Mark's,
Venice, and was probably in early life a singer
in that cathedral. In 1542 he brought out his
first book of madrigals (a 4), a work long held in
favour,2 and for the next 7 or 8 years published
continually.3 About 1550* he appears to have
left Venice for the court of Hercules II. Duke
of Ferrara, and for some years we hear nothing
of him.5 In 1559 he returned to Venice to assist
Willaert in his duties at St. Mark's, and on the
death of that master, was appointed his successor,
Oct. 1 8, 1563. He resigned this position almost
immediately, and went to the court of Parma,
where in a few months he died, at the age of 49.
He was buried in the cathedral of that city, and
the following epitaph gives an authentic sketch
of his life.
Cypriano Roro, Flandro
Artia Musicae
Viro omnium peritissimo,
Cujus nomen famaque
Nee vetustate obrui
Nee oblivione deleri poterit,
Hercules Ferrariens. Duels II.
Deinde Venetorum,
Postremo
Octavi Earnest Parmae et Placentise
Duels II Chori Prsefecto.
Ludovicus frater, fil. et hseredes
Moestissimi posuerunt.
Obiit anno MDLXV. setatis XLIX.
The position to which Rore attained at St.
Mark's, and the rank as a musician which con
temporary writers assigned him, point to his
having been something besides a madrigal com
poser. Yet of his church compositions either in
print or in MS. few have survived.6 We only
1 See title-page ' Fantesie e Recerchari etc. composts da lo Eccell.
A. Vuigliart e Cipria.no tuo Ditcepolo etc. Venetiis 1549 ' (Brit. Mus.
A. 287,1.
2 The Fells library at Brussels contains imperfect copies of three
editions 1552, 69 and 82. The edition in the British Museum is 1575.
3 The following list of books of motets and madrigals is taken from
Feiis' Biographic, Eitner's Bibliographic, and the catalogues of the
British Museum and F4tis libraries. Borne contain work by other
composers, but in all cases they bear Cipriano's name, and he is the
chief contributor. The date given is that of the supposed 1st edition.
Motets. Bk. I, a 5, Venice 1544 (Brit. Mus.) ; Bk. II, a 4 and 5, Venice
1547 (Fetis Biogr.) ; Bk. HI, a 5, Venice 1559 (Eitner).
Madrigals. Bk. I, a 4, Venice 1542 (F«5tis Biogr.) ; Bk. n, a 5, Venice
1544 (Brit. Mus. The words on title-page, 'novamente posti in luce,'
point to this being the 1st edition, though Fetis gives the date 1543.
Eitner knows of no edition earlier than 1551) ; Bk. Ill, a 5. Venice
1544 (F«5tis Bibl. The 1562 edition in Brit. Mus.); Bks. IV and V
(Venice 1568, according to Eitner and Fe"tis, but title-pages prove
these not to be 1st editions. The fifth book contains an ode to the
Duke of Parma, and from the events of the composer's life, we may
assume this volume to be one of his latest publications).
Chromatic madrigals. Bk. I, a 5, 1544 (Brit. Mus. The word 'rls-
tampato' on title-page shows that even this is not Istedition, though
FtStis knows of none earlier than 1560. Be quotes 5 books of these
madrigals, Venice 1560—68). The first book was reprinted as late as
1592 (F(5tis library). Burney has inserted one number in his History.
4 In this year a reprint of his 1st book of madrigals was brought out
at Ferra'ra.
5 Except the publication of 2 Passions (Paris 1557) with the following
curious titles : ' Passio D. N. J. Ohristi in qua solus Johannes canens
Introducitur cum quatuor vocibus ' and ' Passio inquaiutro-
ducuntur Jesus et Oudaei canemes, cum duabus et sex vocibus.'
s Fe~tis mentions a book of Cipriano's masses, a 4, 5, 6 (Venice 1566)
on the authority of Draudius' ' Bibliotheca Classica.' This is probably
'Liber Missarum' a 4, 5, 6 (Venice 1566) to which Cipriano only con
tributes th« 1st mas* ' Doulce memoyre.'
know that they were held in high esteem in the
court chapel at Munich, and were constantly
performed there under Lassus' direction.7 Duke
Albert of Bavaria caused a superb copy of Rore's
motets to be made for his library, where it
remains to this day, with a portrait of the com
poser on the last page, by the court painter
Mielich. [J.R.S.-B.]
ROSA (ROSE), GAEL AUGUST NICOLAS, was
born at Hamburg, March 22, 1843, was educated
as a violin player and made such progress as to
be sent to the Leipzig Conservatorium, which he
entered in 1859. ^n J866 he came to England
and appeared as a solo player at the Crystal
Palace on March 10. After a short stay in
London he joined Mr. Bateman in a concert-
tour in the United States, and there met
Madame Parepa, whom he married at New York,
in. Feb. 1867. His wife's success on the stage
led to the formation of a company under the
management and conductorsliip of Mr. Rose,
which during its early campaigns could boast
such names as Parepa, Wachtel, Santley, Ronconi
and Formes among its artists.
Early in 1871 Mr. Rose — who by this time
had changed his name to Rosa to avoid mistakes
in pronunciation — returned to England with his
wife, and then made a lengthened visit to Egypt
for health. After this they again returned to
London, but only for the lamented death of
Madame Parepa-Rosa, which took place Jan. 21,
1874. Mr. Rosa however was resolved, not
withstanding this serious blow, to test the
fortunes of English opera in London, and on
Sept. n, 1875, he opened the Princess's Theatre
with a company including Miss Rose Hersee as
prima donna, Mr. Santley, and other good
singers. He closed on Oct. 30, having produced
Figaro, Faust, * The Porter of Havre (Cagnoni),
Fra Diavolo, Bohemian Girl, Trovatore, *The
Water Carrier (Cherubini), and Siege of Rochelle.
The season of 1876 was undertaken at the
Lyceum (Sept. n-Dec. 2). It included The
Water Carrier ; The Lily of Killarney (with
additions) ; Sonnambula ; Faust ; * Giralda
(Adam) ; Bohemian Girl ; * Flying Dutchman ;
Zampa ; Trovatore ; Montana ; * Joconde (Ni-
colb) ; Fidelio ; Fra Diavolo ; * Pauline (Co wen) ;
Porter of Havre. The next season was at the
Adelphi Theatre (Feb. n-April 6, 1878). It
included *The Golden Cross, by Briill ; The
Merry Wives ; The Flying Dutchman ; The Lily
of Killarney, and others of those already named.
For the fourth season Mr. Rosa took Her
Majesty's Theatre (Jan. 27-March 22, 1879),
brought out * Rienzi, * Piccolino (by Guiraud)
and * Carmen, and played The Golden Cross,
Huguenots, Lily of Killarney, etc., etc. His
fifth season was at the same theatre (Jan. 10-
March 6, 1880) ; * Mignon (Thomas), * Lohengrin
and *Aida were all produced for the first time
in English; and The Taming of the Shrew
7 Discorsi delli triomphi etc. nelle nozze dell' lllustr. duca Gugl.
etc. da Massimo Trojano (Monaco, Berg. 150H).
* Denotes that the works had not been before produced in England,
at least in English.
160
ROSA.
(Goetz), Carmen, Rienzi, etc. were performed.
The artists engaged at the season of 1880 in
cluded Miss Minnie Hauk, Miss Julia Gay lord,
Mad. Dolaro, Herr A. Schott, Mr. Maas, etc.,
etc. The careful way in which the pieces are
put on the stage, the number of rehearsals, the
eminence of the performers and the excellence of
the performances have begun to bear their
legitimate fruit, and the 'Carl Rosa Opera
Company' bids fair to become a permanent
English institution.
ROSALIA (Germ. Vetter Michel, Schuster-
flcck}. A form of Melody, Vocal or Instrumental,
'in which a Figure is repeated several times in
succession, transposed a note higher at each
reiteration.
The name is derived from an old Italian Canto
popolare, ' Rosalia, mia cara,' the Melody of which
is constructed upon this principle.
tr
«-H»j
3
The well-known German Volkslied, 'Gestern
Abend war Vetter Michel da,' begins with a simi
lar repetition, and hence the figure is frequently
called in Germany, ' Vetter Michel.' These titles,
as well as that of ' Schusterfleck ' — a cobble-
are of course given to it in derision — for writers
on Composition regard its frequent introduction
as indicative of poverty of inventive power.
Nevertheless, it is frequently employed, by the
Great Masters, with charming effect, as may be
seen in the following example from the Minuet
in Handel's 'Ariadne : —
afTS | ! qSt
S3E: EEBESi:
tr
r
[j-jgj:^
rrr
j ^
etc.
*
^*E
It will be observed that the Figure is here
suffered to appear three1 times only in succes
sion. Almost all great writers have imposed
this limit upon its employment, experience hav
ing proved that a four-fold repetition generally
tends to render the passage wearisome. Strik
ingly effective instances of three-fold repetition
will be found, in Mozart's Requiem, at the words
' Ingemisco tamquam reus ' ; in Spohr's ' Last
Judgment,' at ' The grave gives up its dead ' ;
and in a remarkably forcible passage in the ' Ri-
i Sometimes called ' Les trois Ke've'rences.'
ROSALIA.
gaudon' from Rameau's 'Dardanus.' Still, this
restriction is frequently disregarded. Vallerano
has left a Canon,2 which ascends a Tone higher at
each repetition, ad infinitum ; and the resulting
effect is far from inharmonious, though the work
must be regarded rather as a musical curiosity
than a serious Composition.
Closely allied to this Figure is another, in
which the leading phrase is transposed one or
more notes lower at each repetition ; as in
' Habbiam vinto' from Handel's 'Scipio,' in
which the transposition proceeds by Thirds.
tr
tr
-^=^
^
•-=-
^r
-•;
Here, again, the Figure breaks off after a
three-fold reiteration ; and, in two cases in which
Mozart has employed the same device, in his
Requiem — at the words ' Qui Mariam absolvisti,'
and ' Oro supplex et acclinis' — it is relinquished
after the second enunciation. This kind of Imita
tion is, indeed, subject to exactly the same form
of treatment as the true Rosalia ; though it would
be inexact to call it by that name, and equally so
to apply the term to the regular ascents or
descents of a Sequence — as constantly exhibited in
the Fugues of Seb. Bach ; or to those of vocal
Divisions — as in ' Every valley,' or Rossini's
' Quis est homo ' ; or to the anomalous Scene, in
' Tannhauser ' — happily, the only instance of such
treatment known — in which the first Verse of
'Dir tone Lob ' is sung in Db, the second, in Dfi,
the third, in Eb, and a still later one in E t|.
Schumann has been recently accused of writing
Rosalie, usque ad nauseam. He does employ them
very frequently : but, how often — as in the open
ing ef his 'Arabeske' (op. 18) — with an effect
which true genius alone could have dictated.
This is not the place for a detailed criticism of
Schumann's principles of composition : but when,
as in a bitter article, by Joseph Rubinstein,
which lately appeared in Wagner's ' Bayreuther
Blatter,' his masterly use of this particular device
is made to serve as an excuse for its unqualified
condemnation, as a ' vicious monotony-producing
repetition of Musical Phrases on related degrees,
which the Student of Composition loves to intro
duce in his first exercises,' we naturally revolt
from a conclusion so illogical. That a form which
neither Handel, nor Mozart, nor Beethoven, nor
any other great writer has disdained to employ,
can possibly be, in its own nature, ' vicious/ we
2 Reprinted iu rol. i. of Clemeuti's ' Practical Harmon}'.'
ROSALIA.
cannot believe. With equal reason might we
condemn the ' monotony-producing ' effect of a
regular Figure. It is, indeed, quite possible to
make such a Figure monotonous to the last degree ;
yet nearly the whole of Beethoven's ' Andante
in F' (op. 34), is founded on the rhythmic form
of the first four notes of the opening Subject —
ROSEINGRAVE.
161
The truth is, that, in the hands of a Great
Master, all such devices are made productive of
pure and beautiful effects; while all are 'vicious,'
when viciously misused. [W.S.E.]
ROSAMUNDE FURSTIN VON CYPERN
(Rosamond, Princess of Cyprus). A romantic play
in 4 acts ; written by Wilhelmine Christine
Chezy, the overture and incidental music by
Franz Schubert (op. 26). Produced at the Theatre
an-der-Wien, Vienna, Dec. 20, 1823, and only
performed twice. The music as then played is
as follows : —
* 1. Overture (D minor).
i 2. Entracte between Acts 1 and 2 (B minor),
t 3. Ballo (B minors, and Andante un poco assai (&).
4. Entracte between Acts 2 and 3 (D).
* 5. Romance for soprano 'Der Vollmond strahlt'
(F minor).
* 6. Chorus of Spirits.
* 7. Entracte between Acts 3 and i (B b).
8. Shepherds' Melody.
* 9. Shepherds' Chorus.
*10. Huntsmen's Chorus,
til. Air de Ballet (G).
The overture played at the performances was
published in 1827, for PF. 4 hands, by Schubert
himself, as op. 52, under the title of 'Alphonso
und Estrella ' (now op. 69). The overture (in C),
known as the ' Overture to Rosamund e ' (op. 26)
was composed for the melodrama of the 'Zauber-
harfe,' or Magic Harp (produced Aug. 19, 1820),
and was published by Schubert with its present
name and opus-number for PF. 4 hands, in 1828.
The pieces marked have been published — those
marked with * by Schubert himself, as op. 26 ;
those marked with t more recently. For parti
culars see Nottebohm's Thematic Catalogue, p. 46,
84. The Entracte in B minor is one of the finest of
all Schubert's works ; the Romance, the Entracte
no. 7, the Shepherds' Melody, and the Air de Bal
let in G, are all admirable, the Shepherds' Melody
for 2 clarinets especially characteristic. The 2nd
Trio to the Entracte no. 7 was previously composed,
in May 1816, as a song, ' Der Leidende.' [G.]
ROSE or KNOT (Fr. Rosace; Fr. and Germ.
Rosette ; Ital. Rosa). The ornamental device or
scutcheon inserted in the soundhole of the belly
of stringed instruments, such as the lute, guitar,
mandoline, dulcimer, or harpsichord, serving
not only a decorative purpose, but — in the
Netherlands especially — as the maker's 'trade
mark.' In the harpsichord and spinet there was
usually but one soundhole with its rose ; but
owing to the origin of these keyboard instruments
from the psaltery, their analogy with the lute,
and the fact of the Roman lutes having three,
several soundholes were sometimes perforated. In
fact, a clavicembalo dated 1531 was lately seen in
VOL. HI. JET. 2.
Italy by the eminent art critic, Mr. T. J. GulHck,
which possessed no less than five, each with a
rose inserted. From the analogy above referred
to, the old Italian harpsichord makers named
the bottom of the instrument 'cassa armonica'
(soundchest) ; as if its office were like that of the
back of the lute or viol, while the belly was the
'piano armonico' (soundflat).1 The Flemings,
retaining the soundhole, doubtless adhered more
or less to this erroneous notion of a soundchest.
The Hitchcocks in England (1620 and later)
appear to have been the first to abandon it ;
no roses are seen in their instruments. Kivkman
in the next century still adhered to the rose and
trade scutcheon, but Shudi did not. In the
'Giornale cle' Litterati d' Italia' (Venice, 1711,
torn, v.), Scipione Maffei, referring to Cristofori,
who had recently invented the pianoforte, ap
proves of his retention of the principle of the rose
in his ordinary harpsichords, although contem
porary makers for the most part had abandoned
it. But Cristofori, instead of a large rose, to
further, as he thought, the resonance, used two
small apertures in the front. Under the head
RUCKERS will be found illustrations of the rose or
rosace, as used by those great makers. [A. J.H.]
ROSE OF CASTILE. An opera in 3 acts ;
compiled by Messrs. Harris and Falconer (from
Le Muletier de Tolecle), music by M. W. Balfe.
Produced at the Lyceum Theatre (Pyne and
Harrison), London, Oct. 29, 1857. [G.]
ROSEINGRAVE, or ROSINGRAVE,
DANIEL, was educated in the Chapel Royal under
Pelham Humfrey. In 1693 he became organist
of Salisbury Cathedral, which appointment he
quitted in 1698 and was chosen organist and
vicar-choral of St. Patrick's Cathedral, Dublin.
He held these posts for 20 years, when he resigned
them in favour of his son RALPH, who held them
from April 1719 until his death in Oct. 1747.
THOMAS, another son, received his early mu
sical education from his father, and manifesting
great aptitude, was allowed a pension by the
Dean and Chapter of St. Patrick's to enable him
to travel for improvement. He went to Italy in
1710, and at Rome was on friendly terms with
the Scarlattis. In 1 71 2 he composed, at Venice,
an anthem, 'Arise, shine,' preserved in the Tud-
way collection (Harl. MS. 7342). In 1720 we
find him in London, bringing out at the King's
Theatre an adaptation of D. Scarlatti's opera
' Narcissus,' with additional songs composed by
himself. In 1725 he was selected, from seven
competitors, as the first organist of St. George's,
Hanover Square, at a salary of £45 per annum ;
the judges were Drs. Croft and Pepuseh, with
Buononcini and Geminiani, each of whom gave
a subject upon which the candidates were to make
an extempore fugue. Some years afterwards, a
disappointment in love so seriously affected Rose-
ingrave's reason that he was compelled to desist
from his duty, and from 1737 it was performed
by Keeble, who received half the salary. Rosein-
1 In modern Italian we more frequently meet with ' tompaguo,"
' tavula armonica,' and ' fondo,' meaning ' belly ' or ' soundboard.'
M
162
ROSEINGRAVE.
grave died about 1750. He published 'Volun
taries and Fugues for the Organ or Harpsichord ' ;
' Italian Cantatas,' 2 books of 6 each ; and 1 2 solos
for the German flute ; also a collection of ' 42 Suits
of Lessons for the harpsichord composed by Sign.
Domenico Scarlatti,' with an introduction by him
self. He was an enthusiastic admirer of Pales-
trina, and hung his bedroom with pieces of paper
containing extracts from his works. [W.H.H.]
ROSELLEN, HENRI, son of a PF. maker, born
in Paris, Oct. 13, 181 1 ; took 2nd PF. prize at the
Conservatoire 1827, and ist harmony do. 1828.
Was a pupil and imitator of Herz. He published
nearly 200 works for PF. including a 'Me"thode
de Piano' (Heugel), a collection of progressive
exercises entitled ' Manuel des Pianistes ' (ibid.),
and many separate pieces of drawing-room cha
racter, one of which, a Reverie (op. 31, no. i),
enjoyed an extraordinary popularity for many
years over the whole of Europe. He died March
20, 1876. [Gr.]
ROSENHAIN, JACOB, eldest son of a banker,
was born at Mannheim, December 2, 1813. His
teachers were Jacob Schmitt, Kalliwoda, and
Schnyder von Wartensee. His first appearance
as a pianoforte -player was at Stuttgart in 1825,
after that at Frankfort, where his success induced
him to take up his residence. A one-act piece of
his, ' Der Besuch im Irrenhause,' was produced
at Frankfort, December 29, 1834, with great
success ; his second, ' Liswenna,' 3 acts, was
not so fortunate. In 1837 he came to London,
played at the Philharmonic, April i7th, and was
much heard in the concerts of the day. After
this he took up his abode in Paris, where he
became very prominent, giving chamber con
certs in combination with Alard, Ernst, and other
eminent players, and carrying on a school of piano
forte-playing in conjunction with. J. B. Cramer.
His early opera, ' Liswenna,' was provided with a
new libretto (by Bayard and Arago), and brought
out at the Grand Opera as ' Le De'mon de la Nuit,'
March 1 7, 1 85 1 . It had however but a moderate
success, and was withdrawn after four represen
tations, though afterwards occasionally played
in Germany. Another one-act piece, ' Volage et
Jaloux,' produced at Baden-Baden, August 3,
1863, completes the list of his works for the
stage. In instrumental music he was much more
prolific. He has composed 3 symphonies — in G
minor (op. 42), played at the Gewandhaus, Leip
zig, under Mendelssohn's direction, January 31,
1846; in F minor (op. 43), played at Brussels,
and at the Philharmonic, London, April 24, 1854 ;
' Im Friihling,' iu F minor (op. 61), rehearsed at
Conservatoire, but not played. 4 trios for PF.
and strings ; I PF. concerto ; 3 string quartets ;
i cello sonatas ; 12 characteristic studies (op. 17)
and 24 Etudes melodiques (op. 20), both for PF.
solo. Also various pieces for ditto, entitled,
' Poe"mes,' ' Reveries,' etc. ; a biblical cantata,
and various songs, etc. M. Fe"tis credits him
with a broad and pure (style of playing, and
with knowledge and ambition in composition.
Schumann has criticised several of his pieces
with kindness and liberality. [G.]
ROSSETOR.
ROSES, JOSE, priest and musician, born at
Barcelona Feb. 9, 1791, learned music from
Sampere, chapelmaster at Barcelona ; was first
organist of the monastery of San Pablo and then
succeeded his master at Santa Maria del Pino,
a post which he held for thirty years. During
this time he composed a large quantity of music —
masses, requiems, motets, graduals, etc., which are
preserved in MS. in the church. Among his pupils
may be mentioned Calvo, Puig, Rius, Casanovas,
etc. He died at his native city Jan. 2, 1856. [G.]
ROSIN (Fr. Colophane), a preparation applied
to the hair of the violin bow to give it the neces
sary ' bite ' upon the strings. Without some such
agent, the horsehair would slip noiselessly over
the catgut. Rosin is the residuary gum of tur
pentine after distillation. The ordinary rosin of
commerce is a coarse, hard substance, quite use
less to the fiddler, for whom the rough material
undergoes a process of refinement. The ancient
English recipe was to boil rough rosin down in
vinegar, a process no longer in vogue, as excellent
French rosin is now to be had at a very trifling
cost. It is prepared by dissolving the rough
article in a glazed earthen vessel over a slow
charcoal fire. As it melts, it is strained through
coarse canvas into a second vessel also kept at a
moderate heat, from which it is poured into paste
board or metal moulds. The process requires some
delicacy of eye and hand, and the greatest care in
handling so inflammable a material, and is usually
entrusted to women . Some players affect to prefer
the rosin of Gand, others that of Vuillauine, but
both are made of the same material and at the
same factory. Rosin should be transparent, of a
darkish yellow colour in the mass, and quite white
when pulverised : it ought to fall from the bow,
when first applied to the strings, in a very fine
white dust : when crushed between the fingers it
ought not to feel sticky. The best rosin is made
from Venetian turpentine. The same sort of
rosin serves for the violin, viola, and violoncello.
The double-bass bow requires a stiffer preparation
than pure rosin, and accordingly double-bass
rosin is made of ordinary rosin and white pitch
in equal proportions. Emery powder and other
matters are sometimes added in the composition
of rosin, but are quite unnecessary, and even in
jurious to the tone. A liquid rosin, applied to the
bow with a camel's-hair brush, has recently been
invented, and has its advocates. [E.J.P.]
ROSS, JOHN, born at Newcastle-upon-Tyne
in 1764, was placed in his eleventh year under
Hawdon, organist of St. Nicholas Church, a dis
ciple of Charles Avison, with whom he studied for
seven years. In 1783 he was appointed organist
of St. Paul's Chapel, Aberdeen, where he re
mained for half a century. He composed ' An
Ode to Charity,' pianoforte concertos and sonatas,
songs, canzonets, hymns, waltzes, etc. [W.H.H.]
ROSSETOR, PHILIP, a lutenist, who in 1601
issued ' A Booke of Ayres, set foorth to be song
to the Lute, Orpherian, and Base Violl,' contain
ing 42 songs, the poetry and music of the first
21 by Campion, and the rest by Rossetor himself.
ROSSETOR.
In 1609 ne published * Lessons for Consort : Made
by sundry excellent Authors, and set to sixe seve-
rall instruments ; Namely, the Treble Lute, Treble
Violl, Base Violl, Bandora, Citterne, and the
Flute.' On Jan. 4, 1610, a patent was granted
to him and others appointing them Masters of
the Children of the Queen's Revels, under which
they carried on dramatic performances at the
theatre in Whitefriars. In March, 1612, Ros-
setor's company was joined by ' The Lady Eliza
beth's Servants,' but the union lasted for a year
only. In 1616 a privy seal for a patent for the
erection of a theatre in Blackfriars was granted
to Rossetor, Philip Kingman, Robert Jones and
Ralph Reeve, but the Lord Mayor and Aldermen
compelled them to surrender it. [See JONES,
ROBERT, vol. ii. p. 39&.J [W.H.H.]
ROSSI, FRANCESCO, born at Bari about 1645,
canon there 1680; author of 4 operas — 'II Se-
jano moderno' (Venice, 1680") ; 'La Pena degli
Oechi' (Ib., 1688^; 'La Carilda ' (Ib., 1688);
'Mitrane' (Ib., 1689). Also of Psalms and a
Requiem, k 5, printed 1688 ; and an oratorio
' La Caduta dei Gigante.' (MS.) The fine and
•well-known scena ' Ah ! rendimi ' is from Mitrane,
and gives a high idea of Rossi's power. [G.]
ROSSI, LAURO, an Italian composer, who,
like Raimondi, although the author of nu
merous operas, and famous from end to end of
Italy, is hardly so much as known by name
on this side the Alps. He was born1 at Ma-
cerata, near Ancona, February 20, 1812, and
was taught music at the Conservatorio of Naples
under Crescentini, Furno, and Zingarelli. He
began to write at once, and at 1 8 had his first
two operas — ' Le Contesse Villane ' and ' La Vil-
lana Contessa' — performed at the Fenice and
Nuovo Theatres of Naples respectively. Other
pieces followed ; one of them, ' Costanza ed
Uringaldo,' being written expressly for the San
Carlo at the request of Barbaja. On the recom
mendation of Donizetti, Rossi was engaged for
the Teatro Valle at Rome, and there he remained
for 1832 and 1833, and composed 4 operas and
an oratorio. In 1834 he moved to Milan, and
brought out ' La Casa disabitaj;a ' (or ' I falsi
Monetari '), which, though but moderately suc
cessful at the Scala, was afterwards considered
his chef d'ceuvre, and spoken of as ' Rossi's Bar-
biere di Siviglia.' It pleased Malibran so much
that she induced Barbaja to bespeak another
opera from Rossi for the San Carlo, in which she
should appear. The opera was composed, and
was named ' Amelia ' ; but owing to her caprice
was a failure. She insisted on having a pas de
deux inserted for her and Mathis. The theatre
was crowded to the ceiling to see the great
singer dance; but her dancing did not please
the public, and the piece was damned. This
disappointment, though somewhat alleviated by
the success of his 'Leocadia' (1834) seems to
have disgusted Rossi with Italy, he accepted
an engagement from Mexico, left Europe Oct.
i His parents' names were Vincenzo and Santa Monticelli, so that
' Lossi ' would seem to be a sobriquet.
ROSSI-SCOTTI.
163
15, 1835, and arrived at Vera Cruz the 6th of
the following January. From Mexico he went
to the Havannah, New Orleans, and Madras ;
married in 1841, and returned to Europe, land
ing at Cadiz, Feb. 3, 1843. He began again at
once to compose — 'Cellini aParigi' (Turin 1845),
etc., but with very varying success. In 1846 he
reappeared at the Scala at Milan with ' Azema
di Granata,' ' II Borgomaslro di Schiedam,' and
three or four other operas in following years.
His great success however appears to have been
made with ' II Domino nero,' at one of the Mi
lanese Theatres. In 1850 he was called to be
Director of the Conservatorio at Milan. For
this institution he published a ' Guida di ar-
monia pratica orale' (Kicordi 1858), and be
tween 1850 and 1859 composed a great many
operas, and detached pieces for voices and for
instruments. After the death of Mercadante in
1870, Rossi succeeded him as head of the Con
servatorio at Naples. This office he is said to
have resigned in 1878. Lists of his works are
given by Florimo (Cenni Storici, p. 948-962)
and Pougin. They comprise 29 operas, a grand
mass, and a dozen miscellaneous compositions,
including six fugues for strings, 2 sets of vocal
exercises, and the Guide to Harmony already
mentioned. His best works are ' Cellini a Parigi,'
' I falsi Monetari,' and ' II Domino nero.' One
of his operas, ' La Figlia di Figaro/ is said to have
been produced at the Karnthnerthor Theatre,
Vienna, April 17, 1846; and another, 'Biorn,'
was announced for performance at the Queen's
Theatre, London, Jan. 17, 1877 — English ver
sion by Frank Marshall ; but no notice of either
performance can be found. [G.]
ROSSI, LUIGI, was a contemporary of Caris-
simi's, born at Naples towards the end of the
1 6th century, and found at Rome about 1620.
His works known at present are chiefly can
tatas, for one or more voices with clavier ac
companiments, often of great length and in
many movements. Thirty-five of these are to be
found in the British Museum (Harl. MSS. 1265,
1273, 1501, 1863), and not less than 112 in the
Library of Christ Church, Oxford. They are
said to be beautiful music, quite equal to that of
Scarlatti. The Magliabecchi Library at Florence
contains a scene extracted from a 'spiritual opera'
of his, ' Giuseppe figlio di Giacobbe ' ; and the
library of the Sacred Harmonic Society of London
contains ' II Palazzo incantato, overo, La Guer-
riere amante' (MS.), an opera by Giulio Ruspig-
liosi, music by Rossi, performed at Rome 1642.
Gevaerfc, in ' Les Gloires d'ltalie,' gives two
cantatas for a single voice. [G.]
ROSSI-SCOTTI, GIOVANNI BATTISTA, Conte
di, was born Dec. 27, 1836, at Perugia, where
he still resides. He is an amateur of taste and
knowledge, who will be long remembered for the
biography of his fellow - townsman, Morlacchi —
'Delia vita e delle opere del Cav. Francesco
Morlacchi .... Memorie istoriche precedute
i dalla biografia e bibliografia musicale Perugina'
1 (Perugia; Bartelli, 1861)— a copy of which is
'M2
164
KOSSI-SCOTTI.
in the South Kensington Library. He has also
published pamphlets on Morlacchi (1878), and
Bontempi (1879). [G-.]
ROSSINI, GIOACHINO ANTONIO, one of the
brightest musical luminaries of the I9th century,
was born Wednesday, February 29, 1792, at
Pesaro, a small town on the Adriatic, N.W. of
Ancona, and was the only child of Giuseppe
Rossini of Lugo, and Anna Guidarini of Pesaro.
The position of his parents was of the humblest ;
his father was town-trumpeter (trombadore) and
inspector of slaughter-houses, and his mother
a baker's daughter, but their life was a happy
one, and so irrepressible were the good humour
and fun of the town-trumpeter that he was
known among his friends as ' the jolly fellow.'
The political struggles of 1796, however, in
vaded even this lowly household ; the elder
Rossini declared himself for the French, and
for republican government, and during the re
action of the Austrian party in the States of the
Church was naturally sent to gaol. His wife,
thus deprived of her means of subsistence, was
driven to turn her voice to account. She went
with her little Gioachino to Bologna, and there
made her de"but as ' prima donna buffa ' with
such success as to procure her engagements in
various theatres of the Romagna during the
Carnival. Meantime the trombadore had re
gained his liberty and was engaged as horn-
player in the bands of the theatres in which
his wife sang ; the child remaining at Bologna,
in the charge of an honest pork butcher, while
his parents were occupied in campaigns not un
like those of the 'Roman comique' of Scarron.
Such surroundings were hardly favourable to
education, and it is not wonderful that Gioachino's
learning was confined to reading, writing, and
arithmetic. Music he acquired from a certain
Prinetti of Novara, who gave him harpsichord
lessons for three years ; but the lessons must have
been peculiar, for Prinetti was accustomed to
play the scale with two fingers only, combined
his music- teaching with the sale of liquors, and
had the convenient habit of sleeping as he stood.
Such a character was a ready butt for the son of
a joker like Giuseppe Rossini ; and so incor
rigible was Gioachino's love of mimicking his
master that at length he was taken from Prinetti,
and apprenticed to a smith.
Such was his shame at this result and his
sorrow at the distress of his mother, that he
resolved from that time forward to amend and
apply. In Angelo Tesei h.e fortunately found a
clever master, able to make singing and practical
harmony interesting to his pupil : in a few months
he learned to read at sight, to accompany fairly
on the piano, and to sing well enough to take solos
in church at the modest price of three pauls per
service. He was thus able, at the age of ten, to
assist his parents, who, owing to a sudden change
in his mother's voice, were again in misfortune.
In his desire to help them he seized every oppor
tunity of singing in public, and eagerly accepted
an offer to appear at the theatre of the Commune
as Adolfo in Paer's ' Camilla.' This was his
ROSSINI.
first and only step in the career of a dramatic
singer, but it must have been often difficult to
resist taking it up again, when he saw singers re
ceiving a thousand ducats for appearing in operas
which he both composed and conducted for fifty.
Thus at the age of thirteen Rossini was a suf
ficiently good singer to be well received at the
theatre ; he also played the horn by his father's
side, and had a fair reputation as accompanyist.
At this time he acquired a valuable friend in the
Chevalier Giusti, commanding engineer at Bo
logna, who took a great affection for the lad,
read and explained the Italian poets to him, and
opened his fresh and intelligent mind to the
comprehension of the ideal ; and it was to the
efforts of this distinguished man that he owed
the start of his genius, and such general knowledge
as he afterwards possessed. After three years
with Tesei he put himself under a veteran tenor
named Babbini to improve his singing. Shortly
after this his voice broke, at the end of the
autumn of 1 8 06, during a tourne"e in which he
accompanied his father as chorus -master and
maestro al cembalo, an engagement in which the
daily income of the two amounted to n pauls,
about equal to 4 shillings. The loss of his voice
cost him his engagements in church; but it
gave him the opportunity of entering the Con-
servatorio, or Liceo communale, of Bologna. On
March 20, 1807, he was admitted to the counter
point class of Padre Mattel, and soon after to
that of Cavedagni for the cello. He little anti
cipated when he took his first lesson that his
name would one day be inscribed over the en
trance to the Liceo, and give its title to the
adjacent square. l
His progress on the cello was rapid, and he was
soon able to take his part in Haydn's quartets;
but his counterpoint lessons were a trouble and a
worry to him from the first. Before he entered
Mattel's class he had composed a variety of things
— little pieces for two horns, songs for Zambini,
and even an opera, called 'Demetrio,' forhis friends
the Mombellis. A youth at once "so gifted and so
practised deserved a master who was not merely
a learned musician, but whose pleasure it should
be to introduce his pupil into the mysteries of
the art with as little trouble as possible. Un
fortunately Mattel was a pedant, who could see
no reason for modifying his usual slow me
chanical system to suit the convenience of a
scholar however able or advanced. His one
answer to his pupil's enquiry as to the reason
of a change or a progression was, ' It is the
rule.' The result was that after a few months
of discouraging labour Gioachino began to look
to instinct and practice for the philosophy, or
at least the rhetoric, of his art. The actual
parting is the subject of an anecdote which is
not improbably true. Mattel was explaining
that the amount of counterpoint which his pupil
had already acquired was sufficient for a com
poser in the ' free style ' ; but that for church-
music much severer studies were required;
'What,' cried the boy, 'do you mean that I
l By order of Count Pepoli, Aug. 21, 1864.
KOSSINI.
know enough to write operas?' 'Certainly,' was
the reply. ' Then I want nothing more, for
operas are all that I desire to write.' There
was in this something of the practical wisdom
which distinguished the Rossini of later life.
Meantime it was necessary that he and his
parents should live, and he therefore dropped
counterpoint and returned to his old trade of
accompanyist, gave lessons, and conducted per
formances 01 chamber music. He was even
bold enough to lead an orchestra, and took the
direction of the ' Accadeniia dei Concordi ' — in
other words, of the Philharmonic Society of Bo
logna. There is no reason to doubt that it was
more by scoring the quartets and symphonies of
Haydn and Mozart than by any lessons of Padre
Matfcei's that Ptossini learned the secrets and the
magic of the orchestra. His fame at the Liceo
increased day by day. and at the end of his first
year his cantata ' II Pianto d'armonia per la
mnrte d'Orfeo '-—the lament of Harmony over the
death of Orpheus — was not only rewarded with
the prize, but was performed in public, Aug. 8,
1808. He was then in his seventeenth year. The
cantata was followed — not by a symphony, as is
sometimes said, but — by an overture in the fugued
style, in imitation of that to Mozart's 'Magic
Flute,' but so weak, that after hearing it played
he lost no time in destroying it. The same fate
probably attended some pieces for double bass and
strings, and a mass, both written at the instance
of Signor Triossi of Ravenna, a distinguished
amateur of the double bass. Rossini had hitherto
been known at Bologna as ' il Tedeschino ' — ' the
little German ' — for his devotion to Mozart ; but
such serious efforts as composing a mass, and
conducting a work like Haydn's Seasons at the
Philharmonic Society, were probably intended
as hints that he wished to be looked upon no
longer as a scholar, but as a master waiting his
opportunity for the stage.
It may be easier to enter on a career in Italy
than elsewhere, but even there it is not without
its difficulties. Rossini by his wit and gaiety
had, in one of his tourne'es, made a friend of the
Marquis Cavalli, who had promised him his
interest whenever it should be wanted. The
time was now come to claim the fulfilment of the
promise, and Rossini's delight may be imagined
when he received an invitation to compose an
opera, from the manager of the San Mosfc Theatre,
at Venice. He hastened to prepare the piece,
and ' La Cambiale di Matrimonio ' or the ' Ma
trimonial Market' was produced there in the
autumn of 1810. The piece was an opera buffa
in one act ; it was supported by Morandi, Ricci,
De Grecis, and Raffanelli, and had a most en
couraging reception. After this feat he returned
to Bologna, and there composed for Esther Mom-
belli's benefit a cantata called ' Didone abban-
donata.' In 1811 he wrote for the Teatro del
Corso of Bologna an opera buffa in two acts,
'L'Equivoco stravagante,' which closed the season
with success, and in which both he and Marcolini
the contralto were highly applauded.
1812 was Rossini's twentieth year, and with
ROSSINI.
165
it begins what may be called his Epoch of Im
provisation. Early in that year he produced,
at the San Mose Theatre, Venice, two buffa
operas — ' L'Inganno felice,' and ' L'occasione
fa il Ladro, ossia il Cambio della valigia.'
The first of these, a Farsa, a trifle in one act,
was well sung and much applauded, espe
cially an air of Galli's, 'Una voce,' a duet
for the two basses, and a trio full of force and
original melody. After the Carnival he went
to Ferrara, and there composed an Oratorio,
'Giro in Babilonia,' which was brought out
during Lent, and proved a fiasco. So did 'La
Scala di Seta,' an opera buffa in one act, pro
duced at Venice in the course of the spring ; but
on the other hand, ' Demetrio e Polibio,' brought
out at the Teatro Valle, Rome, by his old friends
the Mombellis, was well received. The piece
was not improbably the same that we have men
tioned his writing at the age of fifteen to words
by Mme. Mombelli, retouched according to his
new lights. At any rate a quartet among its
contents was at once pronounced a masterpiece,
and a duet, ' Questo cor,' which followed it, pro
duced an excellent effect. Rossini however did
not waste time in listening to applause. While
the Mombellis were engaged on this serious
opera, he flew off to Milan to fulfil an engage
ment which Marcolini had procured for him, by
writing, for her, Galli, Bonoldi, and Parlamagni,
a comic piece in two acts called ' La Pietra del
Paragone,' which was produced at the Scala
during the autumn of 181 2, with immense success.
It was his first appearance at this renowned
house, and the piece is underlined in the list as
' musica nuova di Gioachino Rossini, di Pesaro.'
The numbers most applauded were a cavatina,
' Ecco pietosa,' a quartet in the second act, the
duel-trio, and a finale in which the word ' Sigil-
lara' recurs continually with very comic effect.
This finale is memorable as the first occasion of
his employing the crescendo, which he was ulti
mately to use and abuse so copiously. Mosca
has accused Rossini of having borrowed this
famous effect from his 'Pretendenti delusi,' pro
duced at the Scala the preceding autumn, for
getting that Mosca himself had learned it from
Generali and other composers. Such accusa
tions, however, were of little or no importance
to Rossini, who had already made up his mind
to adopt whatever pleased him, wheresoever he
might find it. In the meantime he took ad
vantage of his success to pass a few days at
Bologna with his parents, en route for Venice ;
and thus ended the year 1812, in which he had
produced no less than six pieces for the theatre.
Nor was 1813 less prolific. It began with a
terrible, mystification. He had accepted a com
mission of 500 francs for a serious opera for the
Grand Theatre at Venice, but the manager of
San Mose, furious at his desertion, in pursuance
of some former agreement, forced on him a
libretto for that theatre, 'I due Brnschini, o il
figlio per azzardo,' which, if treated as intended,
would inevitably have been the death of the
music. From this dilemma Rossini ingeniously
166
ROSSINI.
extricated himself by reversing the situations,
and introducing all kinds of tricks. The
second violins mark each bar in the overture
by a stroke of the bow on the lamp shade;
the bass sings at the top of his register and the
soprano at the bottom of hers ; a funeral march
intrudes itself into one of the most comical scenes ;
and in the finale the words ' son pentito ' are so
arranged that nothing is heard but 'tito, tito, tito.'
Those of the audience who had been taken into the
secret were in roars of laughter, but the strangers
who had paid for their places in good faith,
were naturally annoyed and hissed loudly. But
no complaints were of any avail with Rossini,
he only laughed at the success of his joke.
' I due Bruschini ' disappeared after the first
night, and the remembrance of it was very
shortly wiped out by the appearance of 'Tan-
credi ' at the Fenice during the Carnival.
The characters were taken by Manfredini, Ma-
lanotte, Todran, and Bianchi. A work so im
portant and so full of spirit, effect, and melody,
was naturally received with enthusiasm, and no
body had time to notice that the long crescendo of
the finale strongly resembled that of Paisiello's
' Rk Teodoro,' that a phrase in the first duo, to
the words ' Palesa almen,' is borrowed from
Paer's ' Agnese,1 and that the allegro in E flat of
the grand duet, 'Si tu sol crudel,' is also borrowed
from the ' Sofonisba ' of the same composer.
Such criticisms as these were lost in the general
admiration at the new and spirited character of
the music. It was in fact the first step in the
revolution which Rossini was destined to effect in
Italian opera. All Venice, and very soon all
Italy, was singing or humming ' Mi rivedrai, ti
rivedro.' Hardly any one now remembers that it
is only to the happy accident that Malanotte was
dissatisfied with her air, and insisted on its being
rewritten, that we owe the ' Di tanti palpiti,'
which was nicknamed the 'aria de'rizzi,' because
it was said to have been dashed off while waiting
for a dish of rice. One must read the accounts
of the day to understand the madness — for it was
nothing else — which ' Tancredi ' excited among
the Venetians. ' I fancied,' said Rossini, with
his usual gaiety, 'that after hearing my opera
they would put me into a madhouse — on the con
trary, they were madder than I.'
Henceforward he was as much feted for his
social qualities as for his music. But he did not
give way to such dissipations for long. His next
work was ' L'ltaliana in Algeri,' an opera buffa
produced at the San Benedetto theatre, Venice,
in the summer of 1813. Its greatest novelty was
the famous trio ' Papataci,' a cha,rming union of
melody and genuine comedy; while the patriotic
air, ' Pensa alia Patria,' which closes the work,
spoke not less powerfully to the hearts of his
countrymen.
'Aureliano in Palmira' and 'II Turco in Italia'
both belong to 1814, and were brought out at the
Scala, Milan, the first in the Carnival, the second
in the autumn season, before an audience some
what more critical than that at Venice. ' Aure
liano,' though it contains some fine things, which
ROSSINI.
were afterwards utilised in ' Elisabetta' and the
' Barbiere,' was a fiasco. The ' Turco' too was not
received with the applause which it afterwards
commanded. Rossini, however, was greatly feted
during his stay in Milan, and among his ' ami
able protectresses' — to use the expression of
Stendhal — was the Princess Belgiojoso, for whom
he composed a cantata entitled ' Egle ed Irene.'
His next opera, 'Sigismondo,' written for the
Fenice at Venice, in the Carnival of 1815, was
unsuccessful, and the failure so far affected him
as to make him give up work for a time, and
retire to his home at" Bologna. There he en
countered Barbaja, who from being a waiter at
a coffee-house had become the farmer of the
public gaming-tables and impresario of the Na
ples theatre. Barbaja though rich was still bent
on making money ; he had heard of the success
of the young composer, and of his brilliant talents,
and was resolved to get hold of him ; and Ros
sini, with the support of his parents on his hands,
was ready enough to listen to any good proposal.
He accordingly engaged with Barbaja to take
the musical direction of the San Carlo and Del
Fondo theatres at Naples, and to compose an
nually an opera for each. For this he was to re
ceive 200 ducats (about £35) per month, with a
small share in the gaming-tables, amounting in
addition to some 1000 ducats per annum, for
which however he obtained no compensation
after the tables were abolished in 1820.
During Murat's visit to Bologna in April
1815 Rossini composed a cantata in favour
of Italian independence ; but politics were not
his line, and he arrived in Naples fully con
scious of this, and resolved that nothing should
induce him to repeat the experiment. The
arrival of a young composer with so great a
reputation for originality was not altogether
pleasing to Zingarelli, the chief of the Conser
vatoire, or to the aged Paisiello. But no intrigues
could prevent the brilliant success of ' Elisabetta,
regina d'Inghilterra/ which was produced before
the Court for the opening of the autumn season,
1815, and in which Mile. Colbran, Dardanelli,
Manuel Garcia, and Nozzari took the principal
parts. The libretto of this opera was by a certain
Schmidt, and it is a curious fact that some of
its incidents anticipate those of ' Kenilworth,'
which was not published till several1}' ears later;
a coincidence still more remarkable when the
difference between the two authors is taken
into account — Walter Scott gay, romantic, and
famous, Schmidt unknown and obscure, and,
though not wanting in imagination, so gloomy
as to have damped the spirits of Rossini by his
mere appearance and conversation. Two his
torical facts should be noted in regard to ' Elisa
betta.' It is the first opera in which Rossini so
far distrusted his singers as to write in the or
naments of the airs ; and it is also the first in
which he replaced the recitative secco by a reci
tative accompanied by the stringed quartet. The
overture and the finale to the first act of
betta' are taken from 'Aureliano.'
1 January, 1821.
ROSSINI.
Shortly before Christmas Rossini left Naples
for Rome to write and bring out two works for
which he was under engagement. The first of
these, 'Torvaldo e Dorliska,' produced at the
Teatro Valle, Dec. 26, 1815, was coldly received,
but the second, ' Almaviva, ossia 1'inutile precau-
zione,' founded on Beaumarchais' ' Barber of
Seville,' by Sterbini, which made its first ap
pearance at the Argentina Feb. 5, 1816, was
unmistakeably damned. The cause of this was
the predilection of the Romans for Paisiello, and
their determination to make an example of an
innovator who had dared to reset a libretto al
ready treated by their old favourite. Rossini,
with excellent taste and feeling, had inquired of
Paisiello, before adopting the subject, whether his
doing so would annoy the veteran, whose ' Bar-
biere' had been for a quarter of a century the
favourite of Europe, and not unnaturally believed
that after this step he was secure from the ill-
will of Paisiello's friends and admirers.1 But
the verdict of a theatre crammed with partisans
is seldom just. It is also as changeable as the
winds, or as Fortune herself. Though hissed on
the first night, 'Almaviva' was listened to with
patience on the second, advanced in favour night
by night, and ended by becoming, under the title
of 'The Barber of Seville,' one of the most popu
lar comic operas ever composed, and actually
eclipsing in spirit and wit the comedy on which
it is founded. It was acted by Giorgi-Righetti
(Rosina), Rossi (Berta),Zamboni (Figaro), Garcia
(Almaviva), Botticelli (Bartolo) and Vitarelli
(Basilio). The original overture was lost, and
the present one belongs to ' Elisabetta ' ; the open
ing of the cavatina 'Ecco ridente ' is borrowed
from the opening of the first chorus in ' Aureliano.'
It is in the delicious andante of this cavatina
that Rossini first employs the modulation to the
minor third below, which afterwards became so
common in Italian music. The air of Berta,
' II vechiotto cerca moglie,' was suggested by a
Russian tune, and the eight opening bars of the
trio ' Zitti, zitti ' are notoriously taken note for
note from Simon's air in Haydn's ' Seasons.'
Indeed it is astonishing that, with his extra
ordinary memory, his carelessness, and his ha
bitual hurry, Rossini should not have borrowed
oftener than he did. He received 400 scudi
(£80) for ' The Barber,' and it was composed
and mounted in a month. When some one told
Donizetti that it had been written in thirteen
days, ' Very possible,' was his answer, ' he is no
lazy:
Lazy as he was, Rossini was destined to write
twenty operas in eight years, 1815-1823. On
his return to Naples after the Carnival of 1816,
and the gradual success of ' The Barber,' he
found the San Carlo theatre in ashes, to the
great distress of the King of Naples, who justly
considered it one of the ornaments of his capi
tal. Barbaja, however, undertook to rebuild it
more magnificently than before in nine months.
1 We have Rossini's own authority for this, and for the opera
having been written in 13 days, in his letter to M. Scitivaux. See
' Musical World.' Nov. 6, 1875, p. 751.
ROSSINI.
167
He kept his word, and thus acquired not only
the protection but the favour of the king.
Rossini obtained the same boon by composing
a grand cantata entitled ' Teti e Peleo ' for the
marriage of the Duchess de Berry. No sooner
had he completed this than he dashed off a 2-act
comic opera entitled 'La Gazzetta' to a libretto
by Tottola, which was produced at the Teatro
dei Fiorentini, Naples, and which, although in,
the hands of a clever and charming actress like
Chambrand, and of two such public favourites
as Pellegrini and Casaccia, was but moderately
successful. The work however contained some
admirable passages, which were afterwards util
ised by the composer. Rossini completed his
reform of serious opera by his ' Otello,' which
was brought out at the Teatro del Fondo,
Naples, in the autumn of 1816, with Isabella
Colbran, Nozzari, Davide, Cicimarra, and Bene-
detti as its interpreters. In this opera, of which
the third act is the finest, the recitatives are fewer
and shorter than before, and, in accompanying
them, the wind instruments are occasionally added
to the strings. Some of the most remarkable
features of this grand work, such as the finale
of the first act, the duet 'Non m'inganno,' a ad
the passionate trio of defiance, were not at first
appreciated: the touching air of Desdemona, 'Se
il padre,' doubly effective after the paternal curse
which precedes it, and the romance of the Willow,
with the harp accompaniment — then quite a
novelty — were better received ; but the tragic
termination of the whole was very distasteful
to the public, and when the opera was taken
to Rome, it was found necessary to invent a
happy conclusion. This curious fact deserves
mention for the light which it throws on the
low condition of dramatic taste in Italy at that
period.
The machinery, and power of rapidly chang
ing the scenes, were at that time so very im
perfect in smaller Italian theatres, that Rossini
would only accept the subject of Cinderella when
proposed to him by the manager of the Teatro
Valle at Rome, on condition that the super
natural element was entirely omitted. A new
comic piece was therefore written by Ferretti
under the title of ' Cenerentola, ossia la bonta
in trionfo ' ; Rossini undertook it, and it was
produced at the beginning of 1817. Its success
was umnistakeable, though the cast was by no
means extraordinary — Giorgi, Catarina Rossi,
Guglielmi, De Begnis, Verni, and Vitarelli.
In the profusion and charm of its ideas tins
delicious work is probably equal to the 'Bar-
biere,' but it appears to us to be inferior in unity
of style. No doubt this is partly owing to the
fact that many of the pieces were originally
composed to other words than those to which
they are now sung. The duet ' Un soave non
sb che,' the drinking-chorus, and the mock pro
clamation of the Baron, are all borrowed from
' La Pietra del Paragone ' ; the air ' Miei ram-
polli' is from 'La Gazzetta,' where it was
inspired by the words ' Una prima ballerina ' ;
the air of Eamiro recalls that to ' Ah ! vieni ' in
168
ROSSINI.
the trio in ' Otello ' ; the delightful stretto of the
finale, the duet 'Zitto, zitto,' the sestet
'Quest' e un nodo avvilupato5 — a truly admir
able morceau — and various other incidental
passages, originally belonged to the ' Turco in
Italia ' ; and the humorous duet ' Un segreto ' is
evidently modelled on that in Cimarosa's ' Ma-
trimonio.' Such repetitions answered their pur
pose at the moment, but while thus extempor
ising his operas Rossini forgot that a day would
arrive when they would all be published, and
when such discoveries as those we have men
tioned, and as the existence of the principal
motif of the duet of the letter in ' Otello ' in the
Agitato of an air from ' Torvaldo e Dorliska,'
would inevitably be made. As he himself con
fessed in a letter about this time, he thought he
had a perfect right to rescue any of his earlier
airs from operas which had either failed at the
time or become forgotten since. Whatever force
there may be in this defence, the fact remains
that ' Cenerentola ' and the ' Barber ' share
between them the glory of being Eossini's chefs
d'ceuvre in comic opera.
From Rome he went to Milan, to enjoy the
triumph of the 'Gazza ladra,' — libretto by Gher-
ardini — which was brought out in the spring of
1817 at the Scala. The dignified martial cha
racter of the overture, and the prodigious rolls of
the drum, produced an immense effect ; and the
same may be said of all the numbers which
are concerned with strong emotion : — give the
public a strong impression, and it will not stop
to discriminate. Nor did the Milanese, at these
early representations, find any difference be
tween the really fine parts of the opera arid
those which are mere remplissage — of which the
' Gazza ladra ' has several. Nor would any one
have noticed, even had they had the necessary
knowledge, that in the first duet and the finale
— as was the case also in the finale to the
'Cenerentola' — Rossini had borrowed an effect
from the Poco adagio of Mozart's Symphony
in C (Kochel, 425) by maintaining a sustained
accompaniment in the wind while the strings
and the voices carry on the ideas and the
ornaments.
From Milan he returned to Naples, and pro
duced 'Armida' during the autumn season, a
grand opera in 3 acts, with ballet, which was
mounted with great splendour, and enjoyed the
advantage of very good singers. The duet
' Amor, possente Nume ! ' — which was soon to
be sung though the length and breadth of Italy,
the air 'Non soffiro 1'offensa,' the incantation
scene, the chorus of demons, and the airs de
ballet, would alone have been sufficient to excite
the Neapolitans ; but these were not the only
pieces applauded, and the remarkable trio ' In
quale aspetto imbelle,' written for three tenors
with extraordinary ease, a pretty chorus of
women 'Qui tutto e calma,' and a scena with
chorus, 'Germano a te richiede' — afterwards em
ployed in the French version of ' Mo'ise' — all
deserve mention.
This fine work had hardly made its appear-
ROSSINI.
ance before Rossini had to dash off two more —
< Adelaide di Borgogna,' sometimes known1 as
' Ottone Re d' Italia,' and an oratorio — ' Mosfe
in Egitto.3 'Adelaide' was produced at the
Argentina at Rome, in the Carnival of 1818,
was well sung and warmly received. 'Mose'
was written for the San Carlo at Naples, and
brought out there in Lent with an excellent cast
O
— Isabella Colbran, Benedetti, Porto, and Noz-
zari. Here for the first time Rossini was so
much pressed as to be compelled to call in
assistance, and employed his old and tried friend
Carafa in the recitatives and in Pharaoh's 2air
' Aspettar nii.' The scene of the darkness was
another step onwards, and the whole work was
much applauded, with the exception of the
passage of the Red Sea, the representation of
which was always laughed at, owing to the im
perfection of the theatrical appliances already
spoken of. At the resumption of the piece,
therefore, in the following Lent, Rossini added
a chorus to divert attention from the wretched
attempt to represent the dividing waves, and it
is to the sins of the Neapolitan stage machinists
that we owe the universally popular prayer 'Dal
tuo stellato soglio,' which is not only in itself a
most important piece of music, but shows the
value which Rossini attached to the rest of the
work, which is indeed one of his very finest.
As some relaxation after this serious effort he
undertook, in the summer of 1818, a one-act
piece, 'Adina, oilCaliffo di Bagdad,' for the San
Carlos Theatre, Lisbon ; and immediately after,
'Ricciarclo e Zoraide' for San Carlo, Naples,
which was sung to perfection at the autumn
season there by Isabella Colbran, Pisaroni
(whose excessive plainness was no bar to her
splendid singing), Nozzari, Davide, and Cici-
marra. Davide's air, the trio, the duet for the
two women, and that of the two tenors, were all
applauded to the echo.
' Ricciardo' was extraordinarily full of ornament,
but ' Ermione,' which was produced at San Carlo
in the Lent of 1819, went quite in the opposite
direction, and affected an unusual plainness and
severity. The result showed that this was a
mistake. Though splendidly sung, 'Ermione'
was not so fortunate as to please, and the single
number applauded was the one air in which
there was any ornamentation. So much for the
taste of Naples in 1819 ! An equally poor re
ception was given to a cantata written for the
re-establishment of the health of the King of
Naples, and sung at the San Carlo Feb. 20,
1819. It consisted of a cavatina for Isabella
Colbran, and an air with variations, which was
afterwards utilised in the bnllet of the ' Viaggio
a Reims.' The piece was hastily thrown off, and
was probably of no more value in the eyes of its
author than was an opera called ' Eduardo e
Cristina' which was brought out at the San
Benedetto, Venice, this same spring, and was in
reality a mere pasticcio of pieces from 'Ermione,'
1 Zanolini is wrong in placing 'Ottone' in his Catalogue as a dis
tinct work.
2 Omitted in the Italian score published in Paris.
ROSSINI.
' Ricciardo,' and other operas, hitherto unheard in
Venice, attached to a libretto imitated from
Scribe. Fortunately the opera pleased the
audience, and sent Rossini back to Naples in
good spirits, ready to compose a new cantata
fur the visit of the Emperor of Austria. The
new work was performed on May 9, 1819, at the
San Carlo, and was sung by Colbran, Davide,
and Rubini, to the accompaniment of a military
band. This Rossini probably accepted as a
useful experience for his next new opera, the
' Donna del Lago/ in the march of which we hear
the results of his experiments in writing for a wind
band. The title of the new work seems to show
that Scott's works were becoming popular even
in Italy.1 Rossini at any rate was not insensible
to their beauties ; and in his allusions to the land
scape of the lake, and the cavatina '0 mattutini
albori ' seems to invite attention to his use of
local colour. Even at the present day the first
act of the opera is well worthy of admiration, and
yet the evening of Monday, Oct. 4, 1819, when
it was first given, with the magnificent cast of
Colbran, Pisaroni, Nozzari, Davide, and Benedetti,
was simply one long torture of disappointment
to the composer, who was possibly not aware that
the storm of disapprobation was directed not
against him so much as against Barbaja the
manager, and Colbran his favourite. Felix qui
potttit rerum cognoscere causas.
On the following evening the hisses became
bravos, but of this Rossini knew nothing, as by
that time he was on his road to Milan. The
Scala opened on Dec. 26, 1819, for the Carnival
season with ' Bianca e Faliero,' libretto by Ro-
mani, which was admirably sung by Camporesi
and others. No trace of it, however, now re
mains except the fine duet and equally good
quartet, which were afterwards introduced in the
' Donna del Lago,' and became very popular at
concerts.
His engagement at Milan over, he hurried
back toNaples, to produce the opera of 'Maometto
secondo,' befoi'e the close of the Carnival. It had
been composed in great haste, but was admirably
interpreted by Colbran, Chaumel (afterwards
Madame Rubini), Nozzari, Cicimarra, Benedetti,
and F. Galli, whose Maometto was a splendid
success. It was the last opera but one that
Rossini was destined to give at Naples before
the burst of the storm2 of the 2Oth July, 1820,
Avhich obliged the King to abandon his capital,
ruined Barbaja by depriving him at once of a
powerful patron and of the monopoly of the
gambling -houses, and drove Rossini to make
important changes in his life. But to return.
Having for the moment no engagement for the
Scala, he undertook to write ' Mathilde di
3 Shahran ' for Rome. Torlonia the banker had
bought the Teatro Tordinone, and was con
verting it into the Apollo; and it was for the
inauguration of this splendid new house that
Rossini's opera was intended. The opening took
1 'The Lady of the Lake' was published in 1810.
2 Eevolt of the Carbonari, under Pepe.
* So written, though prouounoed Sabran by the Italians.
ROSSINI.
169
place on the first night of the Carnival of 1821.
The company, though large, contained no first-
rate artists, and Rossini was therefore especially
careful of the ensemble pieces. The first night
was stormy, but Rossini's friends were in the
ascendancy, Paganini conducted in splendid style,
and the result was a distinct success.
On his return to Naples, Rossini learned from
Barbaja his intention of visiting Austria, and
taking his company of singers to Vienna.
Rossini's next opera, ' Zelmira,' was therefore to be
submitted to a more critical audience than those
of Italy, and with this in view he applied himself
to make the recitatives interesting, the harmonies
full and varied, and the accompaniments expres
sive and full of colour, and to throw as much
variety as possible into the form of the move
ments. He produced the opera at the San Carlo
before leaving, in the middle of December 1821.
•
It was sung by Colbran, Cecconi, Da vide, Nozzari,
Ambrosi and Benedetti, and was enthusiastically
received. On the 27th of the same month, he took
his benefit, for which he had composed a special
cantata entitled ' La Riconoscenza ' ; and the day
after left for the North. He was accompanied by
Isabella Colbran, with whom he had been in love
for years, whose influence over him had been so
great as to make him forsake comedy for tragedy,
and to whom he was married on his arrival at
Bologna. The wedding took place in the chapel
of the Archbishop's palace, and was celebrated by
Cardinal Opizzoni. Rossini has been accused of
marrying for money, and it is certain that Colbran
had a villa and £500 a year of her own, that she
was seven years older than her husband, and that
her reputation as a singer was on the decline.
However this may be, the two Rossinis, after
a month's holiday, started for Vienna, where they
arrived about the end of February, 1822. He
seems to have made his debut before the Vienna
public on the 3Oth of March, as the conductor of
his 'Cenerentola,' in the German version, as
'Aschenbrodel,' and his tempi were found some
what too fast for the ' heavy German language.'
' Zelmira ' was given at the Karnthnerthor opera-
house on April 13, with a success equal to that
which it obtained at Naples. The company was
the same, excepting Cecconi and Benedetti, who
were replaced by Mile. Ekerlin and Botticelli.
An air was added for the former to words fur
nished by Carpani, who was thus secured as an
enthusiastic partisan of the Italian composer.
Rossini was not without violent opponents in
Vienna, but they gave him no anxiety, friends and
enemies alike were received with a smile, and
his only retort was a good-humoured joke. He is
said to have visited Beethoven, and to have been
much distressed by the condition in which he
found the great master. The impression which
he made on the Viennese may be gathered from
a paragraph in the Leipzig ' Allgemeine musik.
Zeitung'4 of the day, in which he is described as
' highly accomplished, of agreeable manners and
pleasant appearance, full of wit and fun, cheerful,
obliging, courteous, and most accessible. He is
* May 8, 1822, reporting the early part of March.
170
ROSSINI.
much in society, and charms every one by his
simple unassuming style.' After the close of the
Vienna season, the Rossinis returned to Bologna,
where his parents had resided since 1798. There,
at the end of September, he received a flattering
letter from Prince Metternich, entreating him to
come to Verona, and ' assist in the general re-
establishment of harmony.' Such invitations, so
couched, are not to be refused, and accordingly
the chief composer of Italy yielded to the request
of the chief diplomatist of Austria, and arrived
at the Congress in time fur its opening, Oct. 20,
1822. Rossini's contribution to the Congress was
a series of cantatas, which he poured forth
without stint or difficulty. The best-known of
these is 'II vero Omaggio'; others are 'L'Augurio
felice,' 'La sacra Alleanza,' and 'II Bardo.' One
was performed in the Amphitheatre, which will
accommodate 50,000 spectators, and wasconducted
by Rossini himself. Work, however, never seems
to have prevented his going into society, and we
find that during this occasion he acquired the
friendship not only of Metternich, but of
Chateaubriand and Madame de Lie"ven.
The Congress at an end he began to work at
'Semiramide,' which was brought out at the
Fenice, Venice, Feb. 3, 1823, with Madame
Rossini, the two Marianis, Galli, and Sinclair the
English tenor, for whom there were two airs.
The opera was probably written with more care
than any of those which had preceded it ; and
possibly for this very reason was somewhat
coldly received. The subject no doubt would
seem sombre to the gay Venetians, and they
even omitted to applaud the fine quartet (which
Verdi must surely have had in his mind when
writing the Miserere in the ' Trovatore '), the
finale, and the appearance of Ninus, the final
trio, at once so short and so dramatic, the cava-
tina with chorus, and all the other new, bold,
bright passages of that remarkable work. Ros
sini was not unnaturally much disappointed at
the result of his labour and genius, and resolved
to write no more for the theatres of his native
country. The resolution was hardly formed
when he received a visit from the manager of
the King's Theatre, London (Sigr. Benelli), and
a proposal to write an opera for that house, to be
called ' La Figlia dell' aria,' for the sum of £ 240 —
£40 more than he had received for 'Semiramide,'
a sum at the time considered enormous. The
offer was promptly accepted, and the Rossinis
started for England without delay, naturally
taking Paris in their road, and reaching it Nov.
9, 1823. Paris, like Vienna, was then divided
into two hostile camps on the subject of the
great composer. Berton always spoke of him as
'M. Crescendo,' and he was caricatured on the
stage as ' M. Vacarmini ' ; but the immortal
author of the 'Barbiere' could afford to laugh
at such satire, and his respectful behaviour to
Cherubini, Lesueur, and Reicha. as the heads of
the Conservatoire, his graceful reception of the
leaders of the French School, his imperturbable
good temper, and good spirits, soon conciliated
every one. A serenade, a public banquet, tri-
EOSSINI.
umphant receptions at the opera house, a
special vaudeville (' Rossini a Paris, ou le Grand
Diner ') — everything in short that could soothe
the pride of a stranger, was lavished upon him
from the first. He in his turn was always kind
and amiable, consenting for instance at tlie
request of Panseron — an old colleague at Rome
— to act as accompanyist at a concert with the
object of saving Panseron's brother from the
conscription. Under the hands of Rossini the
piano became as effective as an orchestra ; and it
is on record that the first time that Auber heard
him accompany himself in a song he walked up
to the instrument and bent down over the keys
to see if they were not smoking. Paris how
ever was not at present his ultimate goal, and
on Dec. 7, 1823, Rossini and his wife arrived in
London. They were visited immediately by the
Russian ambassador, M. de Lieven, who gave the
composer barely time to recover from the fatigues
of the journey before he carried him off to
Brighton and presented him to the King. George
IV. believed himself to be fond of music, and
received the author of 'The Barber of Seville' in
the most flattering manner. The royal favour
naturally brought with it that of the aristocracy,
and a solid result in the shape of two grand
concerts at Almack's, at two guineas admission.
The singers on these occasions were Mme. Rossini,
Mme. Catalan!, Mme. Pasta, and other first-rate
artists, but the novelty, the attraction, was to h^ar
Rossini himself sing the solos1 in a cantata which
he had composed for the occasion, under the title
of ' Homage to Lord Byron.' He also took pi.rfc
with Catalan! in a duet from Cimarosa's ' Matri-
monio ' which was so successful as to be encored
three times. While the court and the town were
thus disputing for the possession of Rossini,
' Zelmira ' was brought out at the Opera (Jan.
24, 1824) ; but the manager was unable to finish
the season, and became bankrupt before dis
charging his engagements with Rossini. Nor
was this all. Not only did he not produce the
' Figlia dell' aria,' but the music of the first act
unaccountably vanished, and has never since been
found. It was in vain for Rossini to sue the
manager ; he failed to obtain either his MS. or
a single penny of the advantages guaranteed to
him by the contract. True, he enjoyed a con
siderable set-off to the loss just mentioned in the
profits of the countless soire'es at which he acted
as accompanyist at a fee of £50. At the end
of five months he found himself in possession of
£7000; and just before his departure was ho
noured by receiving the marked compliments of
the king at a concert at the Duke of Welling
ton's, for which His Majesty had expressly come
up from Brighton.
In leaving England after so hearty ami
profitable a reception, Rossini was not taking
a leap in the dark ; for through the Prince de
Pidignac, French ambassador in England, he
had already concluded an agreement for the
i This recalls the visit of a great composer in 1746, when Gluck g»«
a concert at the King's Theatre, at which the great attraction was
his solo on the musical glasses ! [See vol. i. p. 601 a.]
ROSSINI.
musical direction of the Theatre Italien, Paris,
for eighteen months at a salary of £800 per
annum. In order to be near his work he took
a lodging at No. 28 Rue Taitbout, and at once
set about making a radical reform in the ages of
the singers in his company. Knowing that Paer
was his enemy, and would take any opportunity
of injuring him, he was careful to retain him in
his old post of maestro al Cembalo ; but at the
same time he engaged He'rold (then a young
man of 25) as chorus-master, and as a check on
the pretensions of Madame Pasta he brought to
Paris Esther Mombelli, Schiassetti, Donzelli, and
Rubini, successively. To those who sneered at
his music he replied by playing it as it was
written, and by bringing out some of his operas
which had not yet made their appearance in
Paris, such as 'La Donna del Lago' (Sept. 7>
1824), 'Semiramide' (Dec. 8, 1825), and ' Zel-
mira' (Mar. 14, 1826). And he gave much
eclat to his direction by introducing Meyerbeer's
' Crociato ' — the first work of Meyerbeer's heard
in Paris — and by composing a new opera, 'II
Viaggio a Reims, ossia 1'Albergo del giglio d'oro,'
which he produced on June 19, 1825, during the
fetes at the coronation of Charles X. The new
work is in one act, and three parts ; it is written
for 14 voices, which are treated with marvellous
art. It was sung by Mines. Pasta, Schiassetti,
Mombelli, Cinti, Amigo, Dotti, and Rossi ;
and by MM. Levasseur, Zucchelli, Pellegrini,
Graziani, Auletta, Donzelli, Bordogni, and Scudo
— a truly magnificent assemblage. In the ballet
he introduced an air with variations for two
clarinets, borrowed from his Naples cantata of
1819, and played by Gambaro (a passionate
admirer of his) and by F. Berr. In the hunt
ing scene he brought in a delicious fanfare
of horns, and the piece winds up with ' God
save the King,' 'Vive Henri quatre/ and other
national airs, all newly harmonised and accom
panied.
The King's taste was more in the direction of
hunting than of music, and the result was that
the ' Viaggio ' was only given two or three times ;
but it had been a work of love with Rossini, and
we shall presently see how much he valued it.
Meantime we may mention that after the Revolu
tion of ] 848 the words were suitably modified by
H. Dupin, and the piece appeared in two acts at
the Tneatre Italien as 'Andremo noi a Parigi,'
on Oct. 26 of that year.1
After the expiration of Rossini's agreement as
director of the Theatre Italien, it was a happy
idea of the Intendant of the Civil List to confer
upon him the sinecure posts of ' Premier Composi-
teur du Roi ' and ' Inspecteur General du Chant
en France,' with an annual income of 20,000
francs, possibly in the hope that he might settle
permanently at Paris, and in time write operas
expressly for the French stage. This was also an
act of justice, since in the then absence of any
' The score of ' Andremo noi a Parigi ' is in the Library of the Con
servatoire, but the finale of the 'Viaggio,' which we have mentioned
ROSSINI.
171
law of international 2 copyright his pieces were
public property, and at the disposal not only
of a translator like Castil- Blaze, but of any
manager or publisher in the length and breadth
of France who chose to avail himself of them.
Fortunately the step was justified by the event.
The opera of ' Maometto' — originally written by
the Duke of Ventagnano, and produced at Naples
in 1820 — had never been heard in France. Ros
sini employed MM. Soumet and Balocchi to give
the libretto a French dress ; he revised the
music, and considerably extended it ; and on
Oct. 9, 1826, the opera was produced at the
Academic as ' Le Si^ge de Corinthe,' with a cast
which included Nourrit and Mile. Cinti, and
with great success. The new opera (for which
Rossini received 6,000 francs from Troupenas)
was written at No. 10, Boulevard Montmartre, a
five -storied house which contained the residences
of Boieldieu and Carafa, and was the birthplace
of 'La Dame Blanche/ ' Masaniello,' and
'Guillaume Tell.' It has since been destroyed
in constructing the Passage Jouffroy.
After this feat Rossini turned to another of his
earlier works, as not only sure of success but
eminently suited to the vast space and splendid
mise en scene of the Grand Opera. This was
' Mose.' He put the revision of the libretto into
the hands of Etienne Jouy and Balocchi, and
settled the cast as follows : — Anai, Mile. Cinti
— with a new air (4th act); Sinaide, Mme.
Dabadie; Marie, Mile. Mori; Amtmophis, A.
Nourrit; Moise, Levasseur; Pharaon, Dal a lie ;
Eliezer, Alexis. 'Moise' was produced March 27,
1827, and created a profound impression. True,
it had been heard in its original form at the
Italiens five years before, but the recollection of
this only served to bring out more strongly the
many improvements and additions in the new
version — such as the Introduction to the ist
act ; the quartet and chorus ; the chorus ' La
douce Aurore'; the inarch and chorus, etc. The
fine finale to the 3rd act, an English critic has
pronounced to have no rival but the finale to
Beethoven's C minor Symphony. The airs de
ballet were largely borrowed from ' Armida '
(1817) and 'Ciro in Babilonia' (1812). This
magnificent work gave Rossini a sort of imperial
position in Paris. Bub it was necessary to
justify this, and he therefore resolved to try a
work of a different character, and according to
the axiom of Boileau, to pass
From grave to gay, from lively to severe—
not in the direction of comic but of lyric opera.
With this view he employed Scribe and Poirson
to develope a vaudeville which they had written
in 1816 to the old legend of ' Le Comte Ory,'
adapting to that lively piece some of his fa
vourite music in the ' Viaggio a Reims,' — the
introduction and finale of the ist act, the duet
of the Count and Countess, and the famous
narrative of Raimbaut when he brings up the
2 The custom in Italy in those days was to sell an opera to a man
ager for two years, with exclusive right of representation ; after that
it became public property. The only person who derived no profit
containing natinna airs, is not there, and this curious teat has ' from this arrangement was the umurtunate composer. Sic vos non
probably vanished ior ever. j volls.
172
ROSSINI.
wine from the cellar, which it is difficult to
believe was in its first form applied to the
taking of the Trocade'ro ! Adolphe N ourrit, who
was not only a great artist, but a poet of very
considerable dramatic power, was privately of
much assistance to Rossini in the adaptation of
his old music to the new words, and in the actual
mounting of the piece in which he was to take
so important a share. ' Le Comte Ory ' was
produced at the Acade'mie, Aug. 20, 1828, and
the principal characters were taken by Mine.
Damoreau-Cinti, Miles. Jawurek and Mori,
Adolphe Nourrit, Levasseur, and Dabadie. The
Introduction — in place of an Overture proper —
is based on the old song which gives its name to
the piece. In the second act, the grace and
charm of the melodies more than atone for the
very doubtful incidents of the libretto ; and this
was the most successful portion of the work.
'Charming!' 'Divine!' are the usual comments
on its performance ; but no one seems yet to have
noticed that the most delicious passage of the
drinking chorus (/C'est charmant ! c'est divin !')
is borrowed from the Allegretto scherzando of
Beethoven's 8th Symphony. Rossini was at
that time actually engaged with Habeneck, the
founder of the Concerts of the Conservatoire,
and his intimate friend, in studying the Sym
phonies of Beethoven ; and it is easy to under
stand how impossible it must have been to forget
the fresh and graceful movement referred to, in
the termination of which many have indeed
recognised a distinct allusion to Rossini himself.
The study of Beethoven was at any rate not a
bad preparation for the very serious piece of work
•which was next to engage him, and for a great
portion of which he retired to the chateau of his
friend Aguado the banker at Petit-Bourg. Schiller
had recently been brought into notice in France
by the translation of M. de Barante ; and Rossini,
partly attracted by the grandeur of the subject,
partly inspired by the liberal ideas at that mo
ment floating through Europe, especially from the
direction of x Greece, was induced to choose the
Liberator of the Swiss Cantons as his next sub
ject. He accepted a libretto offered him by
Etienne Jouy, Spontini's old librettist, who in
this case was associated with Hippolyte Bis.
Their words, however, were so unmusical and
unrhythmical, that Rossini had recourse to Ar-
mand Marrast, at that time Aguado's secretary,
and the whole scene of the meetino- of the
conspirators — one of the best in operatic litera
ture, and the only thoroughly satisfactory part of
'G-nillaume Tell' — was rewritten by him, a fact
which we are glad to make public in these
pages.
This grand opera, undoubtedly Rossini's master
piece, was produced at the Acade'mie on Aug. 3,
1829, with the following cast: — Arnold, Nourrit, •
Walter Fiirst, Levasseur ; Tell, Dabadie ; Ruodi,
A. Dupont ; Rodolphe, Massol ; Gessler, Provost ;
1 Evidence of the extent to which liberal ideas had seized society at
this date is to be found in the tact that Carafa's 'Masaniello' and
Auber's 'Muette de Portici'— both bearing directly on popular insur
rection, were produced in Paris on Dec. 27, 1827, and Feb. 29, 1828,
respectively.
EOSSINL
Leutold, Prev6t ; Mathilde, Damoreau-Cinti ;
Jemmy, Dabadie ; Hedwige, Mori.
' Tell ' has now become a study for the mu
sician, from the first bar of the overture to the
storm scene and the final hymn of freedom.
The overture is no longer, like Rossini's former
ones, a piece of work on a familiar, well-worn
pattern, but a true instrumental prelude, which
would be simply perfect if the opening and
the fiery peroration were only as appropriate to
the subject as they are tempting to the execu
tant. We find no absurdities like those in
'Mo'ise' — no song of thanksgiving accompanied
by a brilliant polonaise, no more cabalettas, no
more commonplace phrases or worn-out modula
tions, — in short, no more padding of any kind.
True, it would not be difficult to criticise the
length of the duet in the 2nd act, which recalls
the duet in ' Semiramide,' and breathes rather
the concert -room than the stage — or the style of
the finale of the 3rd act, which is not appropriate
to the situation. But in place of thus searching
for spots on the sun we prefer to bask in his
radiance and enjoy his beneficent warmth.
The spectacle of a great master at the zenith
of his glory and in the very prime of life thus
breaking with all the traditions of his genius and
appearing as in a second avatar is indeed a rare
and noble one. The sacrifice of all the means of
effect by which his early popularity had been
obtained is one which Rossini shares with Gluck
and Weber, but which our former experience of
his character would hardly have prepared us for.
He seems at length to have discovered how an
tagonistic such effects were to the simplicity
which was really at the base of the great musical
revolution effected by him ; but to discover, and
to act on a discovery, are two different things,
and he ought to have full credit for the courage
and sincei-ity with which, at his age, he forsook
the flowery plains in which his genius had for
merly revelled, for loftier and less accessible
heights.
But though deserting, as he does in 'Tell,'
the realm of pure sensation, and discarding the
voluptuous music of his early operas, Rossini
remains still the fresh and copious melodist that
he always was. In fact, he is more. The
strains in which he has depicted the Alps and
their pastoral inhabitants are fresher, more grace
ful, more happy than ever ; the notes which
convey the distress of the agonised father; the
enthusiastic expression of the heroes of Switzer
land ; the harrowing phrases which convey the
anguish of a son renouncing all that he holds
most dear ; the astonishing variety of the colours
in which the conspiracy is painted ; the lofty
strains of the purest patriotism ; the grandeur of
the outlines ; the severity of the style ; the co
existence of so much variety with such admir
able unity ; the truly Olympian dignity which
reigns throughout — all surpass in their different
qualities anything that he ever accomplished
before. But what might not be expected from
a composer who at thirty-seven had thus vo
luntarily submitted himself to the severity of
ROSSINI.
French taste, and was bent on repaying our
hospitality with so magnificent a masterpiece ?
But the career thus splendidly inaugurated
was not destined to be pursued; circumstances,
political and domestic, stopped him on the thres
hold. He was anxious to visit once more the
city in which his beloved mother died in 1827,
and where his father, who had soon tired of
Paris, was awaiting him. With this view he
resigned his office as inspector of singing in
France, and made an arrangement with the
Government of Charles X., dating from the be
ginning of 1829, by which he bound himself for
ten years to compose for no other stage but that
of France, nnd to write and bring out an opera
every two years, receiving for each such opera
the sum of 15,000 francs. In the event of the
Government failing to carry out the arrange
ment he was to receive a retiring pension of
6000 francs. 'Guillaume Tell' was thus to be
the first of a series of five operas.
After a serenade from the opera orchestra,
Rossini, therefore, left Paris for Bologna. Here
he was engaged in considering the subject of
'Faust,' with a view to his next work, when he
received the sudden news of the abdication
of Charles X., and the revolution of July 1830.
The blow shattered his plans and dissipated his
fondest hopes. He flattered himself that he had
regenerated the art of singing in France. What
would become of it again under a king who could
tolerate no operas but those of Grdtry ? Anxious
to know if his friend Lubbert was still at the
head of the Acade'mie de Musique, and if the
new Intendant of the Civil List would acknow
ledge the engagements of his predecessor, he re
turned to Paris in Nov. 1830 ; and intending
only to make a short stay, took up his quarters
in the upper storey of the Theatre des Italiens,
of which his friend Severini was then director.
Here however he was destined to remain till
Nov. 1836. The new government repudiated
the agreement of its predecessor, and Rossini
had to carry his claim into the law-courts.
Had his law-suit alone occupied him, it would
not have been necessary to stay quite so long,
for it was decided in his favour in Dec. 1835.
But there was another reason for his remain
ing in Paris, and that was his desire to hear
'The Huguenots ' and ascertain how far Meyer
beer's star was likely to eclipse his own. It is
impossible to believe that a mere money ques
tion could have detained him so long at a time
when almost every day must have brought fresh
annoyances. After reducing 'Guillaume Tell'
from five acts to three, they carried their love of
compression so far as to give only one act at a time,
as a lever d? rideau, or accompaniment to the
ballet. This was indeed adding insult to injury.
' I hope you won't be annoyed,' said the Director
of the Opera to him one day on the boulevard,
'but to-night we play the second act of Tell.'
' The whole of it ?' was the reply. How much
bitter disappointment must have been hidden
under that reply ! During the whole of this un
happy interval he only once resumed his pen,
ROSSINI.
173
namely in 1832 for the 'Stabat Mater,' at the
request of his friend Aguado, who was anxious
to serve the Spanish minister Seiior Valera. He
composed at that time only the first six numbers,
and the other four were supplied by Tadolini.
The work was dedicated to Valera, with an
express stipulation that it should never leave
his hands. In 1834 he allowed Troupenas to
publish the 'Soire'es musical es,' 12 lovely vocal
pieces of very original form and harmony, several
of which have still retained their charm.
The rehearsals of the Huguenots lingered on,
and it was not till Feb. 29, 1836, that Rossini
could hear the work of his new rival. He re
turned to Bologna shortly after, taking Frankfort
in his way, and meeting Mendelssohn.1 He had
not been long in Bologna before he heard of the
prodigious success of Duprez in the revival of
'Guillaume Tell' (April 17). Such a triumph
might well have nerved him to fresh exertions.
But it came a year too late ; he had already taken,
an unfortunate and irrevocable resolution never
again to break silence. It would be very wrong
to conclude from this that he had lost his in
terest in music. The care which he bestowed
on the Liceo of Bologna, of which he was ho
norary director, show that the art still exercised
all its claims on him. He was especially anxious
to improve the singing of the pupils, and among
those who are indebted to his care, Marietta
Alboni holds the first rank.
Rossini's father died April 29, 1839, and he
soon afterwards learned to his disgust that the
MS. of the Stabat had been sold by the heirs of
Seiior Valera, and acquired by a Paris publisher
for 2000 francs. He at once gave Troupenas full
power to stop both publication and performance,
and at the same time completed the work by
composing the last four movements, which, as we
have already said, were originally added by
Tadolini. The first six movements were produced
at the Salle Herz, Paris, Oct. 31, 1841, amidst
very great applause. Troupenas1 bought the entire
score for 6000 francs.2 He sold the right of
performance in Paris during three months to
the Escudiers for 8000, which they again dis
posed of to the director of the Theatre Italien
for 20,000. Thus three persons were enriched
by this single work. It was performed complete
for the first time at the Salle Ventadour, Jan. 7,
1842, by Grisi, Albertazzi, Mario and Tamburini.
Notwithstanding its brilliant success, .some
critics were found to accuse the composer of im
porting the strains of the theatre into the church ;
but it must not be forgotten that religion in the
South is a very different thing from what it is in
the North. Mysticism could have no place in
the mind of the man who had revived and im
mortalised the legend of Comte Ory. Such a
man will naturally utter his prayers aloud, in the
sunshine of noon, rather than breathe them to
himself in the gloom and mystery of night. The
1 See Killer's 'Mendelssohn,' and M.'s own letter, July 14, 1836.
2 We have mentioned that he paid 6,000 francs for the Siege of
Corinth.' For ' Moise ' he gave only 2,400 ; but, on the other haud,
the ' Cumte Ory ' cost him 12,000, and ' Guillaume Tell' 24,000.
174
ROSSINI.
prayer and the scene of the darkness in ' Mo'ise,
as well as the first movement and the unac
companied quartet in the Stabat, will always
hold their place as religious music ; and are o;
themselves sufficient to show that Rossini, sceptic
as he was, was not without religious feeling.
But no triumphs from without or gratifications
from within can shield us from physical ills. At
the very moment that the Stabat was making
its triumphant progress round the world, Rossini
began to suffer tortures from the stone, which in
creased to such an extent as to force him in May
1843, to Paris, where he underwent an operation
which proved perfectly satisfactory. We next
find him writing a chorus to words by Mar-
chetti for the anniversary festival of Tasso at
Turin, on March 13, 1844. On the 2nd of the
following September ' Othello ' was produced
in French at the Academic with Duprez,
Barroilhet, Levasseur, and Mine. Stoltz. Ros
sini however had nothing to do with this adapt
ation, and the divertissement was arranged
entirely by Benoist from airs in ' Mathilde de
Sabran ' and ' Armida.' Two interpolations in
the body of the piece— the cavatina from 'L'lta-
liana in Algeri ' in the part of Desdernona, and
an air from the ' Donna del Lago ' in that of
lago — were neither appropriate nor satisfactory.
While 'Othello' was thus on the boards of the
opera, Troupenas brought out ' La Foi, 1'Espe'r-
ance et la Charite ' (Faith, Hope, and Charity),
three choruses for women's voices, the two first
composed many years previously for an opera on
the subject of (Edipus. These choruses are
hardly worthy of Rossini. They justify Berlioz's
sarcasm — ' his Hope has deceived ours ; his Faith
will never remove mountains ; his Charity will
never ruin him.' Troupenas also brought out a
few songs hitherto unpublished, and these re-
attracted the attention of the public in some
degree to the great composer. His statue was
executed in marble1 by Etex, and was inau
gurated at the Academic de Musique, June 9,
1846. A few months later (Dec. 30), by his per
mission, a pasticcio adapted by Niedermeyer to
portions of the ' Donna del Lago,' ' Zelmira,' and
'Armida,' and entitled ' Robert Bruce,' was put on
the stage of the Opera, but it was not successful,
and Mme. Stoltz was even hissed. From his
seclusion at Bologna Rossini kept a watchful eye
upon the movements of the musical world. It
would be interesting to know if he regretted
having authorised the manufacture of this pas
ticcio. If we may judge from the very great
difficulty with which some time later Mery ob
tained his permission to translate ' Semiramide '
and produce it on the French stage (July 9, 1860),
he did. It is certain that during his long resi
dence at Bologna he only broke his vow of silence
for the ' Inno popolare a Pio IX.' The com
mencement of this was adapted to an air from 'La
Donna del Lago,' and its peroration was borrowed
from 'Robert Bruce,' which gives ground for
supposing that he himself was concerned in the
i It represented him seafed in an easy attitude. It was destroyed
when the opera-house was burnt down in 1873.
ROSSINI.
arrangement of that opera, and explains his
unnoyance at its failure.
The political disturbances which agitated the
Romagna at the end of 1847 compelled Rossini
to leave Bologna. He quitted the town in much
irritation. His turn for speculation, and his
farming the fisheries, in order, as he said, that
he might always have fresh fish, had given much
offence. After the death of his wife (Oct. 7,
1845), he married (in 1847) Olympe Pelissier,
with whom he had become connected in Paris at
a time when she was greatly in public lavour,
and when she sat to Vernet for his picture of
Judith and Holofernes. In fact at this time the
great musician had to a great extent disappeared
in the voluptuary. From Bologna he removed to
Florence, and there it was that this writer visited
him in 1852. He lived in the Via Larga, in a
house which bore upon its front the words Ad
rotum. In the course of a long conversation Le
snoke of his works with no pretended indifference,
but as being well aware of their worth, and
knowing the force and scope of his genius Letter
than any one else. He made no secret of his
dislike to the violent antivocal element in modern
music, or of the pleasure he would feel when
' the Jews had finished their Sabbath.' It was
also evident that he had no affection for the capital
of Tuscany, the climate of which did not suit him.
At length, in 1855, he crossed the Alps and
returned to Paris, never again to leave it. His
reception there went far to calm the nervous irrit
ability that had tormented him at Florence, and
with the homage which he received from Auber
and the rest of the French artists his health re
turned. His house, No. 2 in the Rue Chaussee
d Antin, and at a later date his villa at Passy,
were crowded by the most illustrious representa
tives of literature and art, to such an extent
that even during his lifetime he seemed to assist
at his own apotheosis. Was it then mere idle
ness which made him thus bury himself in the
Capua of his past successes ? No one who, like
the present writer, observed him coolly, could
be taken in by the comedy of indifference and
modesty that it pleased him to keep up. We
have already said that, after Meyerbeer's great
success, Rossini had taken the resolution of
writing no more for the Academic de Musique
and keeping silence.
The latter part of this resolution he did not
however fully maintain. Thus he authorised
the production of ' Bruschino ' at the B<iuffes
Parisiens on Dec. 28, 1857, though he would not
be present at the first representation. ' I have
given my permission,' said he, ' but do not ask
me to be an accomplice.3 The discovery of the
piece — which is nothing else but his early farce
of 'II figlio per azzardo' (Venice, 1813)— was
due to Prince Poniatowski, and some clever
librettist was found to adapt it to the French
taste. A year or two later MeVy with difficulty
obtained his permission to transform 'Semi-
ramide ' into ' Se'miramis,' and the opera in its
new garb was produced at the Academic July 9.
1860, with Carlotta Marchisio as Semiramis,
ROSSINI.
ROSSINI.
175
her sister Barbara as Arsace, and Ob'n as Assnr.
In this transformation Rossini took no ostensible
part. Carafa at his request arranged the reci
tatives, and wrote the ballet music. These were
mere revivals. Not so the sacred work which
he brought out at the house of M. Pillet-Will
the banker on March 14, 1864, and at the re
hearsals of which he presided in person. We
r.llude to the 'Petite messe solennelle,' which
though so called with a touch of Rossinian
pleasantry is a mass of full dimensions, lasting
nearly two hours in performance. Rossini had
always been on good terms with the bankers of
Paris, and after Rothschild and Aguado he
became very intimate with the Count Pillet-Will
(1781-1860), a rich amateur, passionately fond
of music, who had learned the violin from
Baillot, and amused himself with composing
little pieces for that instrument. His son, more
retiring but not less enthusiastic than his father,
had always been one of Rossini's most devoted
admirers, and on the occasion of the inauguration
of his magnificent house in the Rue Moncey,
it was a happy thought of the composer to allow
his 'Petite messe solennelle' to be heard there
for the first time. This important composition,
comprising solos and choruses, was written with
the accompaniment of a harmonium and two
pianos. On this occasion it was sung by the two
Marchisios, Gardoni, and Agnesi, and was much
applauded; the Sanctus and Agnus were re-
demanded, the chorus portions of the Credo were
much admired, and the fluent style of the fugued
passages in the Gloria — perhaps the best portion
of the work — was a theme of general remark.
Rossini afterwards scored it with slight altera
tions for the full orchestra — perhaps a little
heavily — and in this shape it was performed for
the first time in public at the The'atre Italien,
on the evening of Sunday Feb. 28, 1869, on the
78th birthday of the composer, as nearly as that
could be, seeing that he was born in a leap
year, on Feb. 29.
In the last years of his life Rossini affected
the piano, spoke of himself as a fourth-rate
pianist, and composed little else but pianoforte
pieces. Most of these were in some sense or
other jeux d? esprit ; some were inscribed to his
parrot, or had the most fanciful titles — ' Valse
anti dansante,' 'Fausse couche de Polka-ma
zurka,' • Etude asthmatique,' ' Echantillon de
blague,' etc. The whole were arranged in cases
with such quaint names as ' Album olla podrida,'
'Les quatre1 mendiants,' ' Quatre hors-d ceuvre,'
'Album de Chateau,' 'Album de Chaumiere,'
etc. For the Exposition universelle of 1867,
however, he wrote a Cantata, which was per
formed for the first time at the ceremony of
awarding the prizes on July i, and was also
executed at the opera at the free performances
on August 15, 1867 an(i 68. It opens with a
hymn in a broad style, in which the author of
'Semiramis' and 'Moise' is quite recognisable,
but winds up with a vulgar quick-step on a
motif not unlike the country dance known as
1 Dried fruits for dessert.
' L' Ostenc!ai«e.' The title, which we give from
the autograph, seems to show that the son of the
jolly ' trombadore ' of Pesaro was quite aware of
the character of the finale of his last work.
A Napoleon III
et
& son vaillant Peuple.
Hymne
avec accompagnement d'orchestre et musique militaire
pour baryton (solo), un Pontife,
chceur de Grands PrStres
chceur de Vivandieres, de Soldats, et de Peuple.
A la fin
Danse, Cloches, Tambours et Canons.
Excusez du peu ! !
The final touch is quite enough to show that
Rossini to the last had more gaiety than pro
priety, more wit than dignity, more love of
independence than good taste. He preferred the
society of artists to any other, and was never so
happy as when giving free scope to his caustic
wit or his Rabelaisian humour. His bons mots
were abundant, and it is surprising that no one
has yet attempted to collect them. It is a task
which we commend to M. Joseph Vivier, the
eminent horn-player, himself a master of the art,
and formerly one of the liveliest and most inti
mate of the circle at Passy. One or two may find
place here. When that charming actress Mme.
Arnould Plessy met Rossini for the first time she
was a little embarrassed at not knowing exactly
how to address him. 'To call you Monsieur
would be absurd, and unfortunately I have no
right to call you my master.' ' Call me.' said he,
•mon petit lapin.' One day, in a fit of the
spleen, he cried out, 'I am miserable; my nerves
are wrong, and every one offers me string in
stead.' D'Ortigue, the author of the Dictionary
of Church Music, had been very severe on him
in an article in the ' Correspondant ' entitled
' Musical royalties,' and an enthusiastic admirer
of the Italian School having replied some
what angrily, Rossini wrote to him, 'I am
much obliged to you for your vigorous treat
ment (lavement] of the tonsure of my friend
the Cure" d'Ortigue.' A number of friends were
disputing as to which was his best opera, and
appealed to him : — ' You want to know which
of my works I like best ? Don Giovanni ! ' He
took extreme delight in his summer villa at Passy,
which stood in the avenue Ingres, and had a fine
garden of about three acres attached to it. Here
he was abundantly accessible to every one who
had any claims on his notice, and the younger and
gayer his visitors the more he seemed to enjoy
them. More than one young English musician has
cause to remember the charming familiarity of the
great composer with his 'jeune confrere.' In that
house he died on Friday Nov. 13, 1868, at 9 p.m.
after a long day of agony. His funeral was
magnificent. As Foreign Associate of the In
stitute (1833) ; Grand Officer of the Legion of
Honour (1864"), and the orders of St. Maurice
and St. Lazare; commander of many foreign
176
ROSSINI.
orders, and honorary member of a great number
of Academies and musical institutions — Rossini
had a right to every posthumous honour possible.
The funeral took place at the church of the
Trinity on Saturday Nov. 21, 1868 ; it was
gorgeous, and was attended by several deputa
tions from Italy. Tamburini, Duprez, Gardoni,
Bonnehe'e, Faure, Capoul, Belval, Obin, Delle
Sedie, Jules Lefort, Agnesi, Alboni, Adelina
Patti, Nilsson, Krauss, Carvalho, Bloch, and
Gross:, with the pupils of the Conservatoire,
sang the Prayer from 'Mo'ise.' Nilsson gave
a fine movement from the ' Stabat ' of Per-
golesi, but the most impressive part of the
ceremony was the singing of the 'Quis est homo'
from Rossini's own 'Stabat mater' by Patti and
Alboni. To hear that beautiful music rendered
by two such voices, and in the presence of such
artists, over the grave of the composer, was to
feel in the truest sense the genius of Rossini,
and the part which he has played in the music
of the ipth century.
At the opening of his career Rossini had two
courses before him, either, like Simone Mayer
and Paer, to follow the footsteps of the old
Neapolitan masters, or to endeavour to revolu
tionise the Italian opera, as Gluck and Mozart
had revolutionised those of France and Germany.
He chose the latter. We have described the
eagerness with which he threw himself into the
path of innovation and the audacity with which
while borrowing a trait of harmony or of piquant
modulation from Majo (1745-74) or the skeleton
of an effect from General! (1783-1832) he extin
guished those from whom he stole, according to
the well-known maxim of Voltaire. His great
object at first was to carry his hearers away,
and this he did by the crescendo and the ca-
baletta, two ready and successful methods. We
have already mentioned his innovations in the
accompaniment of the recitatives, first, in ' Elisa-
betta,' the full quartet of strings, and next in
' Otello ' the occasional addition of the wind in
struments. This was a great relief to the mo
notony of the old secco recitative. But his
innovations did not stop there : he introduced
into the orchestra generally a great deal more
movement, variety, colour, combination, and (it
must be allowed) noise, than any of his prede
cessors had done, though never so as to drown
the voices. In Germany the orchestra was well
understood before the end of the i8th century;
and we must not forget that — not to speak of
Mozart's operas, of Fidelio, or of Cherubini's
masterpieces — before the production of the Bar-
biere (1816), eight of Beethoven's Symphonies
were before the world. But in Italy instrumen
tation was half a century behind, and certainly
none of Rossini's predecessors in that country
ever attempted what he did in his best operas,
as for instance in the finale to Semiramide
(1823), where the employment of the four horns
and the clarinets, and the astonishingly clever
way in which the orchestra is handled generally,
are quite strokes of genius. The horns are
ROSSINI.
always favourites of his, and are most happily
used throughout ' Guillaume Tell,' where we may
point to the mixture of pizzicato and bowed notes
in the Chorus of the 1st act, the harp and bell iu
the Chorus of the 2nd act, and other traits in,
the Conspiracy scene as marks of real genius, for
the happy and picturesque effects produced by
very simple means. Rossini had further, like
all the great masters, a strong feeling for rhythm,
as the most powerful of all aids to interest and
success, and was fond of quick movements and
of triple time.1 But an excessive love of jewels
is apt to lead to the use of sham diamonds, and
his incessant pursuit of effect led him to ex
cessive ornamentation, to noise, and to a passion
for attractive forms rather than for the feeling
which should lie at the root of them. Much of
this, however, was atoned for in his early operas
by his masterly way of writing for the voices, by
the strength of his melody, the copious flow of
his ideas, and the irresistible contagion of his
good spirits, especially in comic opera. Having
thus secured his position in public favour, his
next step — a very legitimate one — was to .satisfy
the demands of his own taste and conscience.
During this second period the subjects of his
operas increase in interest. In £Mose' he deals
with the religious sentiment. In the 'Donna
del Lago ' he rivals Walter Scott on his own
field ; and in ' Semiramide ' he has recourse to
oriental history in his endeavour to give an in
dependent value to his drama. During this
period his melodies drop some of their former
voluptuous character, but in return are more
pathetic and more full of colour, though still
wanting in tenderness and depth.
Lastly, in his Paris operas, and especially in
'Guillaume Tell/ the influence of French ta>te
makes itself strongly felt, and we find a clear
ness, a charm, a delicacy in the small details,
a sense of proportion and of unity, a breadth
of style, an attention to the necessities of the
stage, and a dignity — which raise this epoch of
his career far higher than either of the others.
Rossini's music, as we have already said, has
been very differently estimated. Ingres, in whose
view honesty in art held almost as high a place
as genius or originality, has called it ' the music
of a dishonest (malhonnete) man.' Berlioz would
gladly have burnt it all, and Rossini's followers
with it.2 On the other hand, Schubert, though
fully alive to his weaknesses, as his caricatures
of Rossini's overtures show, and with every
reason to dislike him from the fact that the
Rossini furore kept Schubert's own works off the
stage — contrasts his operas most favourably with
the ' rubbish ' which filled the Vienna theatres at
that time, and calls him emphatically 'a rare
genius.' ' His instrumentation,' he continues, 'is
often extremely original, and so is the voice writing,
1 The English reader will find these points happily touched on in
Mr. Sutherland Edwards's ' History of the Opera,' chap. xvi. Bo''
sini's use of the solo bass voice, in which, consciously or not, he
followed the lead of Mozart, has been already mentioned in this
Dictionary, vol. i. p. 149.
2 Berlioz, 'Memoires,' chap. xiv. The abuse of the 'brutale
caisse de Itossiui ' sounds oddly from Berlioz's pen..
ROSSINI.
nor can Ifindany fault with the music (of Otello) if
I except the usual Italian gallopades and a few
reminiscences of Tancredi.' 1 Mendelssohn too, as
is well known, would allow no one to depreciate
Rossini. Even Schumann, so intolerant of the
Italian School, is enthusiastic over one of his
operas, and calls it ' real, exhilarating, clever
music.' Such exaggerations as those of Ingres
and Berlioz are as bad as intentional injustice ;
it is better to recollect the very difficult circum
stances which surrounded an Italian composer
eighty years ago, and to endeavour to discover
why music which was once so widely worshipped
has now gone out of fashion. Is it the fault of
his librettos? No doubt he would have been
wiser to stick to comic subjects, like that of' The
Barber of Seville,' and to have confined himself
for his librettos to the poets of his own family.
Is it the elaborate ornamentation of much of
his music? No doubt ornamented music de
cays sooner than that of a plainer style, and it
is always dangerous, though tempting, to adopt
the fashionable forms. But one main reason is
to be found in the deterioration of the art of
singing ; the Paris opera can now boast neither
' te'nor de force ' nor ' te"nor de grace ' ; and the
recent revival of the 'Comte Ory' (Oct. 29, 1880)
showed conclusively the mediocrity of the present
singers at the Academic. In fact Rossini is now
expiating his fault in having demanded too much
from his singers.2 Some feeling of remorse on
this head seems to have prompted his efforts
to improve the art of singing both in Paris and
Bologna. Indeed so keenly alive was he to the
tendencies which have degraded the stage since
1830, and so anxious to further the love of fresh
melody and the prosecution of sound musical
study, that he bequeathed to the Institute an
annual sum of 6000 francs (£240) for a competi
tion both in dramatic poetry and composition,
specifying particularly that the object of the
prize should be to encourage composers with a
turn for melody. The prize was given on the
first occasion to M. Paul Collin, author of the
libretto of the 'Daughter of Jairus,' and to the
Countess de Grandval, a distinguished musician,
but hardly a remarkable melodist. The greater
part of his property Rossini devoted to the
foundation and endowment of a Conservatoire
of Music at his native town, ' Pesaro, of which
A. Bazzini has just (June iSSi) been appointed
Director.
In order to complete this sketch it is neces
sary to give as complete a list as possible of his
works. N.B. In the column after the names, (i)
signifies that the score has been engraved; (2)
that it is published for voices and piano; (3) that
it is still in manuscript.
1 Letter in Kreissle's Biography of Schubert, chap. vi!.
2 It is amusing to find Eossini accused in his own time, as
both Beethoven and Wagner have been, of being a destroyer of the
voice. The correspondent of the Allg. Musik. Zeitung, writing from
Venice in April 1819, mentions a certain Countess Dieterichstein at
Koine, who pronounced that his passages were so straining and ruinous
for both throat and chest that if he wrote operas for ten years longer
there would be no more singers left in Italy. Giorgi, continues the cor
respondent, for whom he wrote the Cenerentola, is already completely
ruined.
VOL. III. PT. 2.
ROSSINI.
I. OPERAS.
177
Title.
l=Full.
Score
2=PF.
do
B-=MS.
First
representation.
First
performance
in London
at King's
Tlieatre.
Adelaide di Borgogna,
-2, S
Home, Car. 1818
or Ottone B6 d'ltalia
Adina (farsa)
— 2, 3
Lisbon, 1818
Armida
— 2, 3
Naples, Aut. 1817
Assedio di Corinto, L'
— 2, S
Milan, Dec. 26, 1828
June 5, 1834
Aureliano in Palmira
-2,3
Milan, Dec. 26, 1813
June 22, 1826
Barbiere di Siviglia. 11
— 2, 3
Home, Feb. 5, 1816 1
Jan. 27, 1818
Barbier de Seville, Le
1,2.-
Lyons, Sept. 19,1829
Paris, May 6, 1824
Bianca e Faliero
— 2, 3
Milan, Dec. 26, 1819
Bruschini, I due (farsa)
Venice, 1813
Bruschino
— 2,—
Paris, Dec. 28, 1857
Cambiale di matri-
— 2, 3
Venice, Aut. 3810
monio, La (farsa)
Cambio della valigia,
-2, 3
Venice, 1812
11, or L'occasione, etc.
(farsa)
Cenerentola, I/a
-2, 3
Borne, Car. 1817
Jan. 8, 1820
Cendrillon
2
Comte Ory, le
1. 2i-
Paris, Aug. 20, 1828
Feb. 28. 1829
Conte Ory, 11
— 2, 3
Milan, 1828 (?)
Dame du Lac, La
1,
Paris, Oct. 21, 1825
Demetrio e Polibio
-2, 3
Borne, 1x12
Donna del Lago, La
-2, 3
Naples, Oct. 4, 1819
Feb. 18, 1823
Edoardo e Cristina
-2, S
Venice, Car. 1819
Elisabetta
-2,3
Naples, Aut. 1815
Apr. 20, 1818
Equivoco stravagante
-2, 3
Bologna, Aut. 1811
Ermione
'~~ «( O
Naples, Lent, 1819
Gazza ladra, La
-2,3
Milan, May 31, 1817
Mar. 10, 1821
Gazzetta. La
-2,3
Naples, 1816
Guglielmo Tell
1,2, 3
Milan, 1829 (?)
July 11, 1839
Guillaume Tell
1,2,—
Paris, Aug. 3, 1829
Ingannofelice,L'(farsa)
-2, 3
Venice, Car. 1812
July 1,1819
Isabelle, adapted from
-2,-
do.
Italiana in Algeri, L'
-2,3
Venice, 1813
Jan. 27, 1819
Maometto Secondo
-2,3
Naples, Car. 1820
Matilde di Shabrau
— 2, 3
Kome, Car. 1821
July 3, 1823
Mathilde de Sabran
— 2,—
Paris, 1857
Moi'se
1,2,—
Paris, Mar. 27, 1827
Mos& in Egitto (2 or
-2.3
Naples, Lent, 1818
(Pietro 1'Ere-
4 acts)
mita) Apr.
23, 1822
Do. 2nd Italian libretto
Paris, 1827
Occasione fa il ladro,
Venice, 1812
L', or 11 cambio, etc.
(farsa)
Otello
— 2, 3
Naples, Aut. 1816
May 6, 1822
Otello, ou le More de
Lyons, Dec. 1, 1823
Venise (Castil-Blaze)
Othello
Othello (Royer&Waez)
-2,-
Paris, Sept. 2, 1844
Ottone Re d' Italia
(see Adelaide)
Pietra del Paragone.La
-2, 3
Milan, Sept. 26, 1812
-
Pietro 1'Eremita
Apr. 23, 1822
Pie voleuse, La
1
Paris, 1822
Ricciardo e Zoraide
-2,8
Naples, Aut. 1818
June 5, 1823
Bobert Bruce
Paris, Dec. 30, 1846
Boberto Bruce
1847
Scala di seta, La(farsa)
-2,3
Venice, Car. 1812
Semiramide
— 2, 3
Venice, Feb. 3, 1823
July 15, 1824
Se"miramis
— 2, 3
Paris, July 9, 1860
Sie'ge de Corinthe, Le
1,2,-
Paris, Oct. 9, 1826
Sigismondo
— 2, 3
Venice, Car. 1815
Tancredi
-2,3
Venice, Car. 1813
May 4, 1820
Torvaldo e Dorliska
— 2, 3
Rome, Dec. 26, 1815
Turco in Italia, 11
-2,3
Milan, Aug. 14, 1814
May 19, 1821
ZeVmira
-2.3
Naples, Dec. 1821
Jan. 24, 1824
II. CANTATAS AND ORATORIOS.
l=Full Score
Title.
2=PF. do.
First
representation.
Augurio felice L'
Verona, 1823
Bardo, 11
"Verona, 1823
Didone abbandonata
— 3
Bologna, 1810
Pastori, I
Naples, 1820 (?)
Pianto delle Muse, 11
London, 1823
Riconoscenza, La
— — S
1821
Sacra Alleanza, La
Verona. 1823
"Vero Ommaggio, 11
Verona, 1823
Giro in Babilonia (Ora
- 2, S
Ferrara, Lent. 1812
torio)
i This is the correct date, not Dec. 26, 1816. [See vol. i. 138 b.\
N
178
EOSSINI.
HI. SACKED MUSIC.
Stabat Mater, 1832-41. 1, 2, 3. ment of the service in the church
La Foi, L'Espe'rance, et la Cha- 'of S. Francesco dei Minor! con-
rite", 1844. 2, 3. Instrumented by ventuali.
Balbi.
Petite Messe Solennelle, 1864.
2, 3.
Tantum ergo, for 2 tenors and
Quoniam, bass solo and or
chestra. 1, 2, 3.
O Salutaris, 4 solo voices. Pub
lished at Paris in 'La Maitrise,'
bass, with orchestra. 1,2,3. Com- and reproduced in facsimile by
posed at Bologna, and performed j Azevedo in his ' Rossini."
Nov. 28, 1847. for the re-establish- '
IV. MISCELLANEOUS VOCAL MUSIC.
Gorgheggi e Solfeggi. Acollec-i Les Soire'es musicales. 8 ariettas
tion of exercises for the voice. and 4 duets.
II pianto delle Muse, for solo ( Inno populare, on the accession
and chorus. Composed on the of Pius IX. Chorus,
occasion of Byron's death. Dall' Oriente I'astro del giorno,
Kon posso o Dio, resistere. Can- a 4.
tata.
Oh quanto son grate. Duettino.
Irene ed Egle. Cantata for so
prano and mezzo soprano.
Cara Patria. Cantata.
Chant des Titans. Chorus.
Se il vuol la Molinara.— Rossini's
first composition.
La Separazione. Dramatic song.
Ridiamo, cantiamo, a 4.
Alle voci della gloria. Scena ed
Aria.
Various other airs and pieces, thirty or forty
in number, will be found in the catalogues of
Blcordi, Lucca, Brandus (Troupenas), and Escu-
dier, which it is hardly necessary to enumerate
here. — Probably no composer ever wrote so much
in albums as did Kossini. The number of these
pieces which he threw off while in London alone
is prodigious. They are usually composed to
some lines of Metastasio's, beginning 'Mi lagnera
tacendo della sorte amara,' which he is said to
have set more than a hundred times.
We have stated that during the latter years
of his life Rossini composed a great quantity of
music for the PF. solo, both serious and comic.
These pieces were sold by his widow en masse to
Baron Grant for the sum of £4000. After a
time the whole was put up to auction in London
and purchased by Ricordi of Milan, M. Paul
Dalloz, proprietor of a periodical entitled 'La
Musique/ at Paris, and other persons.
V. INSTRUMENTAL MUSIC.
March (Pas redouble') composed
Le rendezvous de chasse. A fan
fare for 4 trumpets, composed at
Compiegne in 1828 for M. Schikler,
and dedicated to him.
3 Marches for the marriage of
H.R.H. the Duke of Orleans. Ar
ranged for PF. a 4 mains.
for H.I.M. the Sultan Abdul Med-
jid. Arranged for PF. solo (Bene
dict), and a 4 mains.
5 String Quartets, arranged as
Sonatines for thePF. by Mockwitz
(Breitkopf & Hftrtel).
To enumerate and elucidate all the biographical
and critical notices of Rossini would require a
volume, we shall therefore confine ourselves to
mentioning these of importance either from their
authority, their ability, or the special nature of
their contents ; and for greater convenience of
reference we have arranged them according to
country and date.
I. Italian.
G. Carpani. Lettera all' anonimo autore dell' articolo
sul ' Tancredi ' di Rossini. Milan, 1818, 8vo.
G-. Carpani. Le Eossiniane, ossia Lettere musico-
teatrali. Padua, 1824, 130 pages, Svo. Portrait.
Nic. Bettoni. Bossini e la sua musica. Milan, 1824,
8vo.
P. Brighenti. Della musica rossiniana e del suo au
tore. Bologna, 1830, Svo.
Lib. Musumeci. Parallelo tra i maestri Rossini e Bel
lini. Palermo, 1832, Svo.
Anon. Osseryazioni sul merito musicale dei maestri
Bellini e Rossini, in riposta ad un Parallelo tra i mede-
simi. Bologna, 1834. Svo. This pamphlet was translated
into French by M. de Ferrer, and published as ' Rossini
et Bellini.' Paris, 1835. Svo.
ROSSINI.
Anon. Rossini e la sua musica ; una Passeggiata con
Rossini. Florence, 1841, 16mo.
Anon. Dello Stabat Mater di Gioachino Rossini, Let
tere Storico-critiche di un Lombardo. Bologna, 1842, Svo.
Giov. Raffaelli. Rossini, canto. Modena, 1844, Svo.
Fr. Regli. Elogio di Gioacchlno Rossini. We have
not been able to discover how far Regli (1804-66) has
used this work in his Dizionario biografico ' (1860).
E. Montazio. Gioacchino Rossini. Turin, 1862, 18mo,
Portrait.
Giul. Vanzolini. Della vera Patria di G. Rossini
Pesaro, 1873, Svo.
Ferrucci. Giudizio perentorio sulla verita della Patria
di G. Rossini impugnata dal Prof. Giul. Vanzolini. Flo
rence, 1874 ; an Svo pamphlet of 20 pages.
Sett. Silvestri. Della vita e delle opere di G. Rossini.
Milan, 1874, Svo. ; with portrait and fac-similes.
Ant. Zanolini. Biografia di Gioachino Rossini. Bo
logna, 1875, Svo ; with portrait and fac-similes.
II. French.
Papillon. Lettre critique sur Rossini. Paris, 1823, 8vo.
Stendhal. Vie de Rossini. Paris, 1823, Syo. Stendhal,
whose real name was Henri Beylej compiled this work
from Carpani. In many passages in fact it is nothing
but a translation, and Beyle's own anecdotes are not
always trustworthy. It was translated into English
(London. 12mo, 1826) and German (Leipzig, 1824), in the
latter case by Wendt, who has added notes and cor
rections.
Berton. De la musique me"canique et de la musique
philosophique. Paris, 1824, Svo; 24 pages.
Ditto, followed by an Ejitre a un celebre compositeur
franc.ais (Boieldieu). Paris, 1826, Svo ; 48 pages.
Imbert de Laphale'que. De la Musique en France:
Rossini, Guillauine Tell. (' Revue de Paris,' 1829.)
J. d'Ortigue. De la guerre des dilettanti, ou de la 16-
volution oper^e par M. Rossini dans 1'op^ra francaia.
Paris, 1829, Svo.
N. Bettoni. Rossini et sa musique. Paris, Bettoni,
1836, Svo.
Anon. Vie de Rossini, etc. Anyers, 1839, 12mo; 215
pages. By M. Van Damme, who in his turn has bor
rowed much from Stendhal.
L. de Lorne'nie. M. Rossini, par un homme de rien.
Paris, 1842, Svo.
Aulagnier. Quelques observations sur la publication
du ' Stabat mater1 de Rossini. Paris, 1842, 4to.
Anon. Observations d'un amateur non dilettante au
sujet du 'Stabat' de M. Rossini. Paris, 1842, Svo.
E. Troupenas. Resume* des opinions de la Presae sur
le ' Stabat ' de Rossini. Paris, 1842, Svo ; 75 pages.
Escudier freres. Rossini, sa vie et ses osuvres. Paris,
1854, 12mo ; 338 pages.
Eug. de Mirecourt. Rossini. Paris, 1855, 32mo.
A. Azevedo. G. Rossini, sa vie et ses oeuvres. Paris,
1865, large Svo; 310 pages, with portraits and facsimiles.
This is the most complete and eulogistic work on
Rossini. It appeared originally in the Mdnestrel,' but
was discontinued there, the editor not approving of a
violent attack on Meyerbeer, which Azevedo (1873' 1875)
included in it.
Virmaitre et Elie Fre'bault. Les maisons comiques de
Paris, 1868, 12mo. One chapter is devoted to the house
of Rossini.
N. Roqueplan. Rossini. Paris, 1869, 12mo. ; 16 ;
E. Beule". Eloge de Rossini. Paris, 1869.
A. Pougin. Rossini, Notes, impressions, souvenirs,
commentaires. Paris, 1870, Svo ; 91 pages. The detailed
and annotated chronological list mentioned on p. 8 has
not yet been published.
O. Moutoz. Rossini et son ' Guillaume Tell.' Bourg,
1872, Svo.
Vander Straeten. La melodie populaire dans 1'op^ra
Guillaume Tell ' de Rossini. Paris, 1879, Svo.
III. German.
Oettinger. Rossini, Komischer Roman. Leipzig, 1847.
A satirical work translated into Danish by Marlow
(Copenhagen, 1849, 2 vols. 8vo) ; into Swedish by Land-
berg (Stockholm, 1850, 2 vols. 8vo> ; and into French by
Royer 'Rossini, 1'homme et 1'artiste' (Brussels, 1858,
3 vols. 16mo).
ROSSINI.
OttoGumprecht. Musikalische Charakterbilder. Lei p.
2ig, 18G^>, Svo.
Fd. Hiller. Plaudereien rait Rossini. Inserted (with
date 1856) in Hiller's ' Aus dem Tonleben unserer Zeit '
(Leipzig, 1868) ; translated into French by Ch. Schwartz
in ' La France musicale,' 1855 ; and into English by Miss
M. E. von Glenn in ' Once a Week,' 1870.
A. Struth. Bnssini, sein Leben, seine "Werke und
Charakterziige. Leipzig.
La Mara. Musikalische Studienkopfe. Leipzig, 1874-
76, 2 vols. 12ruo. See vol. ii.
IV. English.
Hogarth. Memoirs of the Musical Drama. London,
1838, 2 vols. 8vo.
H. S. Edwards. Rossini's Life. London, I860, 8vo;
portrait.— History of the Opera, Ib. 1862, 2 vols. Svo.
—Rossini and his School, 1881.
Portraits of Rossini are frequent at all periods
of his life. Marochetti's statue, in which he is
represented sitting, was erected in his native town
in 1864. There is a good bust by Bartolini of
Florence. In the 'foyer' of the Opera in the
Hue Le Peletier, Paris (now destroyed), there
was a medallion of Rossini by Chevalier ; a du
plicate of this is in the possession of the editor
of the ' Me"nestrel.' The front of the new opera
house has a bronze-gilt bust by M. Evrard.
A good early engraving; of him is that from an
oil-painting by Mayer of Vienna (1820). Of later
ones may be mentioned that by The'venin after
Ary Scheffer (1843) : still later, a full length
drawn and engraved by Masson, and a photo
graph by Erwig, engraved as frontispiece to the
PF. score of Semiramis (Heugel). Among the
lithographs the best is that of Grevedon ; and of
caricatures the only one deserving mention is
that by Dantan. [G-.C.]
ROTA, or ROTTA (Fr. Rote ; Germ. Rotte).
Not, as might be supposed from its name, a
species of vielle or hurdy-gurdy, but a species of
psaltery or dulcimer, or primitive zither, employed
in. the middle ages in church music. It was played
with the hand, guitar-fashion, and had seven strings
mounted in a solid wooden frame. [E.J.P.]
ROUGET DE LISLE, CLAUDE JOSEPH,
author of the MARSEILLAISE, born at Montaigu,
Lons-le-Saulnier, May 10, 1760. He entered
the School of Royal Engineers (' Ecole royale du
ge"nie') at Mezieres in 1782, and left it two
years later with the rank of 'aspirant -lieu
tenant.' Early in 1789 he was made second
lieutenant, and quartered at Joux, near Be-
san9on. At Besangon, a few days after the
taking of the Bastille (July 14, 1789), he wrote
his first patriotic song to the tune of a fa
vourite air. In 1790 he rose to be first lieu
tenant, and was moved to Strassburg, where he
soon became very popular in the triple capacity
of poet, violin-player, and singer. His hymn,
' a la LiberteY composed by Ignace Pleyel, was
sung at Strassburg at the fete of Sept. 25, 1791.
While there he wrote three pieces for the
theatre, one of which, 'Bayard en Bresse,' was
produced at Paris Feb. 21, 1791, but without suc
cess. In April 1792 he wrote the MARSEIL
LAISE, of which an account has been given else
where. [See vol. ii. p. 219.] As the son of royalist
parents, and himself belonging to the coustitu-
ROUND.
179
tional party, Rouget de Lisle refused to take
the oath to the constitution abolishing the crown ;
he was therefore stripped of his military rank,
denounced, and imprisoned, only to escape after
the fall of Robespierre. After this he re-entered
the army, and made the campaign of La Vendee
under General Hoche ; was wounded, and at length,
under the Consulate, returned to private life at
Montaigu, where he remained in the depth of
solitude and of poverty till the second Restoration.
His brother then sold the little family property,
and Rouget was driven to Paris ; and there would
have starved but for a small pension granted by
Louis XVIII. and continued by Louis Philippe,
and for the care of his friends Beranger, David
d1 Angers, and especially M. and Mad. Voiart,
in whose house at Choisy-le-Roi he died, June
27, 1836.
Besides the works already mentioned, he pub
lished in 1797 a volume of ' Essais eii vers et en
prose ' (Paris, F. Didot, an V de la Re"publique)
dedicated to Mdhul, and now extremely rare ; so
also is his 'Cinquante chants Franc_ais' (1825,
4to.), with PF. accompaniment. One of these
songs, 'Roland a Roncevaux/ was written in
1/92, and its refrain—
Mourir pour la patrie,
C'est le sort le plus beau, le plus digne d'envie —
was borrowed by the authors of the ' Chant des
Girondins,' which was set to music by Varney,
and played a distinguished part in the Revolution
of 1848. [SeeVARNBY.] The 'Cinquante chants'
is his most important work, but we must not
omit to mention two others, ' Macbeth/ a lyrical
tragedy (1827, Svo), and 'Relation du de'sastre de
Quiberon,' in vol. ii. of the 'Me'moires de tous.'
There exists a fine medallion of Rouget by
David d5 Angers, which is engraved in a pamphlet
by his nephew, entitled ' La ve"rite sur la pater-
nite* de la Marseillaise' (Paris, 1 865). Statues will
probably be erected to him at Lons-le-Saulnier,
and at Choisy le Roi. See the volume of M. Le
Roy de Ste.Croix (Strassburg, 1880). [G.C.]
ROUND. I. 'A species of canon, in the
unison, so-called because the performers begin
the melody at regular rhythmical periods, and
return from its conclusion to its commencement,
so that it continually passes round and round
from one to another of 1them.' Rounds and
Catches, the most characteristic forms of English
music, differ from canons in only being sung at
the unison or octave, and also in being rhyth
mical in form. Originating at a period of which
we have but few musical records, these composi
tions have been written and sung in England
with unvarying popularity until the present day.
The earliest extant example of a round is the
well-known ' Sumer is i-cumen in,' as to the
date of which there has been much discussion,
although it is certainly not later than the middle
i 'The Rounds, Catches, and Canons of England; a Collection of
Specimens of the sixteenth, seventeenth, and eighteenth centuries
adapted to Modern Use. The Words revised, adapted, or re-written
by the Rev. J. Powell Metcalfe. The Music selected and revised, and
An Introductory Essay on the Rise and Progress of the Round
Catch and Canon; also Biographical Notices of the Composers,
written by Edward F. Rimbault, LL.D.,' from which work much of
the information contained iu the above article has been derived.
N2
180
BOUND.
of the I3th century. This ingenious and in
teresting composition (which is printed in fac
simile in Chappell's 'Popular Music' and in
score in Hawkins) is preserved in the Harleian
MSS. (978) in the British Museum. It is (as the
late Dr. Rimbault has pointed out) founded on
the old ecclesiastical litany chant 'Pater de ccelis
Deus,' and is written for six voices, four of which
sing the round proper or ' rota ' (as it is termed
in the Latin directions for singing it), whilst the
other two sing an accompanying ground or ' pes.'
Amongst early writers on music, the terms
' round ' and ' catch ' were synonymous, but at
the present day the latter is generally under
stood to be what Hawkins (vol. ii) defines as
that species of round ' wherein, to humour some
conceit in the words, the melody is broken,
and the sense interrupted in one part, and
caught again or supplied by another,' a form
of humour which easily adapted itself to the
coarse tastes of the Restoration, at which period
rounds and catches reached their highest popu
larity. That catches were immensely popular
with the lower classes is proved by the numerous
allusions to ' alehouse catches ' and the like in
the dramas of the i6th and i;th centuries. Ac
cording to Drayton (' Legend of Thomas Crom
well,' Stanza 29) they were introduced into Italy
by the Earl of Essex in 1510.
The first printed collection of rounds was that
edited by Thomas Bavenscroft, and published in
1609 under the title of 'Pammelia. Musicks
Miscellanie : or Mixed Varietie of pleasant
Boundelayes and delightfull Catches, of 3. 4. 5.
6. 7. 8. 9. 10. Parts in one.5 This interesting
BOUND, CATCH, AND CANON CLUB.
collection contains many English, French, and
Latin rounds, etc., some of which are still po
pular. Amongst them there is also a curious
'Bound of three Country Dances in one' for
four voices, which is in reality a Quodlibet on
the country-dance tunes ' Bobin Hood/ ' Now
foot it,' and 'The prampe is in my purse.'
'Pammelia' was followed by two other collec
tions brought out by Bavenscroft, 'Deufcero-
melia' in 1609, and 'Melismata' in 1611, and
the numerous publications of the Playfords, the
most celebrated of which is 'Cntch that catch
can, or the Musical Companion' (1667), which
passed through many editions. The most com
plete collection of rounds and catches is that
published by Warren in 32 monthly and yearly
numbers, from 1763 to 1794* which contains
over 800 compositions, including many admir
able specimens by Purcell, Blow, and other
masters of the English school. It is to be re
gretted that they are too often disfigured by an
obscenity of so gross a nature as to make them
now utterly unfit for performance. The Bound
has never been much cultivated by foreign com
posers. One or two examples are however well
known, amongst them may be mentioned Cheru
bim's ' Perfida Clori.'
The quartet in Fidelio, 'Mir ist so wunderbar,'
as well as Curschmann's trios, 'Ti prego' and
' L'Addio, ' though having many of the charac
teristics of rounds, are not in true round -form,
inasmuch as they are not infinite, but end in
codas. They are canons, not rounds. A good
specimen of the round proper is Dr. William
Hayes's ' Wind, gentle evergreen.'
&
i
•fr-tfr
-1 h
Wind, gentle
e - ver-green to form a shade A - round the tomb where So - phocles is laid.
gweet i - vy, bend thy boughs and in - ter - twiue With blush - ing ros - es and the clustering vine.
3E
5
9?
Thus will thy last - ing leaves with beauties hung, Prove grate - ful em -
TJ.. -& 9 • # '
blems of the lays he
sung.
II. Any dance in which the dancers stood in a
circle was formerly called a round or roundel.1
The first edition of the ' Dancing Master' (1651)
has thirteen rounds, for six, eight, or 'as many
as will.' Subsequent editions of the same book
have also a dance called ' Cheshire Bounds/ and
Part II. of Walsh's ' Compleat Country Dancing
Master' (1719) has Irish and Shropshire rounds.
These latter dances are however not danced
in a ring, but ' longways/ i. e. like ' Sir
Boger de Coverley.' In Jeremiah Clarke's
' Choice Lessons for the Harpsichord or
Spinett' (1711), and similar contemporary pub
lications, the word rondo is curiously corrupted
into ' Bound 0.' [W.B.S.]
1 'Come now a roundel and a fairy song.'
Midsummer Night's Dream, act. ii. sc. 2.
BOUND, CATCH, AND CANON CLUB.
A society founded in 1843, by the late Enoch
Hawkins, for the purpose of singing the new
compositions of the professional members and
others written in the form of Bound, Catch, and
Canon ; hence the title of the Club. Among the
original members were Messrs. Enoch Hawkins,
Hobbs, Bradbury, Handel Gear, Henry Phillips,
Addison, D'Almaine, and F. W. Collard. The
meetings were originally held at the Crown and
Anchor Tavern, whence the Club removed to
Freemasons' Tavern, thence to the Thatched
] House, again to Freemasons' Tavern, and lastly
r to St. James's Hall, where it still assembles
every fortnight from the first Saturday in No
vember until the end of March, ten meetings
being held in each season. In the earlier years of
ROUND, CATCH, AND CANON CLUB.
its existence the number both of professional and
non- professional members at each dinner rarely
exceeded eighteen, but now from sixty to seventy
dine together. The management of the Club
devolves upon the professional members, each of
whom in turn takes the chair, and is alone
responsible for the entertainment. The musical
programmes now consist mainly of glees, although
an occasional catch is introduced.
The professional members at the present time
are Messrs. Winn, Baxter, Fred. Walker, Coates,
and Hilton. The officers are — Mr. Winn, 'Clerk
of the Eecords ' ; Mr. Baxter, ' Librarian ' ; and
Mr. Coates, ' Chancellor of the Exchequer.' Mr.
William Winn, vicar-choral of St. Paul's Cathe
dral, in 1876 succeeded to the post of ' Clerk' on
the resignation of Mr. Francis after twenty-eight
years of valuable service to the Club. The chair
man of the evening is addressed as ' Mr. Speaker.'
The Club has from time to time offered prizes for
the composition of glees: in 1869 the first prize
was won by Mr. Winn, and the second by Mr.
Coates; in 1870 the competition had the same
result; and in iSSo the first prize was awarded
to Mr. Coates, and the second to Mr. Winn.
For the non-professional members, who must be
nominated and seconded by two members, there
is an entrance fee of three guineas, and an annual
subscription, for the ten meetings and dinners, of
five guineas. [C.M.]
EOUSSEAU, JEAN JACQUES, born at Geneva,
June 28, 1712, died at Ermenonville, near Paris,
July 3, 1778, five weeks after Voltaire. The
details of his life are given in his ' Confessions';
we shall here confine ourselves to his compo
sitions, and his writings on music. Although,
like all who learn music late in life and in a
desultory manner without a master, Eousseau
remained to the end a poor reader and an
indifferent harmonist, he exercised a great
influence on French music. Immediately after
his arrival in Paris he read a paper before the
Academie des Sciences (Aug. 22, 1742) on
a new system of musical notation, which he
afterwards extended and published under the
title of 'Dissertation sur la musique moderns'
(Paris, 1743, Svo.). His method of representing
the notes of the scale by figures — I, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7 — had been already proposed by Souhaitty,
but Eousseau's combinations, and especially his
signs of duration, are so totally different as
entirely to redeem them from the- charge of
plagiarism. A detailed analysis and refutation
of the system may be found in Eaymond's ' Des
principaux systemes de notation musicale' (Turin,
1824, Svo), to which the reader is referred; but
it is evident that however convenient notation by
means of figures may be for writing a simple
melody, it becomes as complicated as the old
system when modulation or polyphony are at
tempted. Its very uniformity also deprives the
reader of all assistance from the eye ; the sounds
must be spelt out one by one, and the difficulty
of decyphering orchestral combinations or com
plicated harmonies becomes almost insuperable.
Copying music had been Rousseau's means of
EOUSSEAU.
181
livelihood, and this led him to believe that the
best way to learn an art is to practise it ; at any
rate he composed an opera ' Les Muses galantes,'
which was produced at the house of La Pope-
liniere, when Eameau, who was present, declared
that some pieces showed the hand of a master,
and others the ignorance of a schoolboy.
Not being able to obtain access to any of
the theatres, Eousseau undertook to write the
articles on music for the 'Encyclopedic,' a task
which he accomplished in three months, and
afterwards acknowledged to have been done
hastily and unsatisfactorily. We have mentioned
under the head of EAMEAU [vol. iii. p. 72 a] the
expose" by that great musician of the errors in
the musical articles of the ' Encyclopedic' ; Eous-
seau's reply was not published till after his
death, but it is included in his complete works.
Three months after the arrival in Paris of the
Italian company who popularised the ' Serva pa-
drona'1 in France, Eousseau produced 'Le Devin
du village' before the King at Fontainebleau,
on Oct. 1 8 and 24, 1752. The piece, of which
both words and music were his own, pleased
the court, and was quickly reproduced in Paris.
The first representation at the Academie took
place March I, 1753, and the last in 1828, when
some wag2 threw an immense powdered perruque
on the stage and gave it its deathblow. [DEVIN
DU VILLAGE, vol. i. 441 o.] It is curious that
the representations of this simple pastoral should
have coincided so exactly with the vehement dis
cussions to which the performances of Italian
opera gave rise. We cannot enter here upon the
literary quarrel known as the ' Guerre des Bouf-
fons,' or enumerate the host of pamphlets to
which it gave rise,3 but it is a strange fact, only
to be accounted for on the principle that man is
a mass of contradictions, that Eousseau, the au
thor of the ' Devin du Village/ pronounced at
once in favour of Italian music.
His ' Lettre sur la musique Fran<jaise' (1753)
raised a storm of indignation, and not unnatu
rally, since it pronounces French music to have
neither rhythm nor melody, the language not
being susceptible of either ; French singing to be
but a prolonged barking, absolutely insupport
able to an unprejudiced ear; French harmony
to be crude, devoid of expression, and full of
mere padding; French airs not airs, and French
recitative not recitative. 'From which I con
clude,' he continues, 'that the French have no
music, and never will have any ; or that if they
ever should, it will be so much the worse for
them.' To this pamphlet the actors and mu
sicians of the Ope"ra replied by hanging and
burning its author in effigy. His revenge for
this absurdity, and for many other attacks, was
the witty 'Lettre d'un symphoniste de 1'Aca-
de'mie royale de musique a ses camarades de
1 It has been generally supposed that the ' Serva padrona' was not
heard in Paris before 1752 : this however is a mistake ; it had been
played so far back as Oct. 4, 1746, but the Italian company who per
formed it was not satisfactory, and it passed almost unnoticed.
2 Supposed to have been Berlioz, but he exculpates himself in his
' Me'moires,' chap. xr.
s See Chouquet's ' Histoire de la musique dramatique,' ISi and 434.
182
ROUSSEAU.
1'orchestre' (1753), which may still be read with
pleasure. The aesthetic part of the ' Dictionnaire
de inusique,' which he finished in 1 764 at Motiers-
Travers, is admirable both for matter and style.
He obtained the privilege of printing it in Paris,
April 15, 1765, but did not make use of the
privilege till 1 768 ; the Geneva edition, also in
one vol. 4to, came out in 1767. In spite of mis
takes in the didactic, and serious omissions in
the technical portions, the work became very
popular, and was translated into several lan
guages; the English edition (London, 1770, 8vo.)
being by Waring.
Rousseau's other writings on music are : 'Lettre
a M. Grimm, au sujet des remarques ajoute'es a
sa Lettre sur Omphale,' belonging to the early
stage of the 'Guerre des Bouffons'; ' Essai sur
I'origine des langues,' etc. (1753), containing
chapters on harmony, on the supposed analogy
between sound and colour, and on the music of
the Greeks ; ' Lettre a M. I'Abbe' Raynal au
sujet d'un nouveau mode de musique invent^ par
M. Blainville/ dated May 30, i754> ar>d first
printed in the ' Mercure de France ' ; ' Lettre a
M. Burney sur la Musique, avec des fragments
d'Observations sur 1'Alceste italien de M. le
chevalier Gluck/ an analysis of' Alceste' written
at the request of Gluck himself; and 'Extrait
d'une re'ponse du Petit Faiseur a son Prete-Nom,
sur un rnorceau de 1'Orphe'e de M. le chevalier
Gluck/ dealing principally with a particular modu
lation in ' Orphe'e.' From the two last it is clear
that Rousseau heartily admired Gluck, and that
he had by this time abandoned the exaggerated
opinions advanced in the ' Lettre sur la musique
Fran£aise.' The first of the above was issued in
1752, the rest not till after his death ; they are
now only to be found in his 'Complete Works.5
On Oct. 30, 1775, Rousseau produced his 'Pyg
malion ' at the Comedie Franyaise ; it is a lyric
piece in one act, and caused some sensation owing
to its novelty. Singing there was none, and the
only music were orchestral pieces in the inter
vals of the declamation. He also left fragments
of an opera 'Daphnis et Chlo^' (published in
score, Paris, 1 780, folio), and a collection of about
a hundred romances and detached pieces, to which
he gave the title 'Consolations des Miseres
de ma vie ' (Paris, 1781, Svo), all now forgotten.
Rousseau was accused of having stolen the
' Devin du Village ' from a musician of Lyons
named Granet, and the greater part of ' Pyg
malion ' from another Lyonnais named Coigniet.
Among his most persistent detractors is Casstil-
Blaze (see 'Moliere musicien,' ii. 409), but he says
not a word of the ' Consolations.' Now any one
honestly comparing these romances with the
' Devin du Village,' will inevitably arrive at the
conviction that airs at once so simple,natural, and
full of expression, and so incorrect as regards har
mony, not only may, but must have proceeded
from the same author. There is no doubt, how
ever, that the instrumentation of the ' Devin '
was touched up, or perhaps wholly re-written, by
Francoeur, on whose advice, as well as on that of
Jelyotte the tenor singer, Rousseau was much in
ROUSSELOT.
the habit of relying. — 'Rousseau's Dream' was
at one time a popular tune in this country. An
air ('de trois notes') and a duettino, melodious
and pretty but of the simplest style, are given in
the ' Musical Library,' vol. iii. ("G.C.]
ROUSSEAU'S DREAM. A very favourite air
in England in the early part of this century. Its
first appearance under that name is presumably
as ' an Air with Variations for the Pianoforte,
composed and dedicated to the Rt. Hon. the
Countess of Delaware, by J. B. Cramer. London,
Chappell' [1812].
But it is found (with very slight changes) a
quarter of a century earlier, under the title of
' Melissa. The words by Charles James, Esq.,
adapted to the Pianoforte, Harp, or Guitar.
London, J. Dale, 1788.' Whether the air is
Rousseau's or not the writer has not ascertained.
It is not in his ' Les Consolations/ etc. (Paris,
1781). [G.]
ROUSSELOT, SCIPION, was born about the
commencement of this century, entered the Con
servatoire at Paris as a pupil of Baudiot on the
cello, and took the first prize in 1823. He then
studied composition under Reicha, and on Feb.
9, 1834, produced a symphony of his composition
at the concert of the Conservatoire; he also
attempted opera, but was not happy in that
department, though he is said to have rendered
important assistance to Bellini in the instru
mentation and harmonious arrangement of 'I
Puritani.' His quartets, quintets, variations for
the cello, and other chamber music, were much
esteemed and played in Paris. In 1844 or 45,
Rousselot came to England ; he took the cello
at the Musical Union concerts of the latter
year. He was one of the party with Vieuxtemps,
Sivori, Sainton, and Hill, who performed the
whole of Beethoven's quartets at the house of
Mr. Alsager, in a series of meetings beginning
April 28, 1845, and a prime mover in that me
morable undertaking, which introduced Bee
thoven's later quartets to England. After Mr.
Alsager's death early in 1847, Rousselot carried
on the performances at his own risk, under the
name of the 'Beethoven Quartet Society'; and
on May 4, 1 847, gave a concert to Mendelssohn
of his own works — the Quartet in D op. 44, no. i ;
the Trio in C minor, op. 66; and the Ottet, op. 20;
Mendelssohn himself playing Beethoven's 32
1 variations, besides joining in the Trio, etc. Rous
selot was deservedly popular in London, not
only with the public but with his fellow artists;
but the increasing admiration for Piatti's su
perior playing withdrew attention from him,
1 Mendelssohn played without book, and left out Var. 30, iu 3-4, as h«
admitted afterwards to Mr. J. w, Davison.
EOUSSELOT.
and in 1848 or 1849 ne returned to Paris,
where he has since led a very retired life.
While in London he started a musical publishing
business in Regent Street, but it did not succeed.
— His brother, JOSEPH FRANCOIS, a horn-player
of great note, was born Feb. 6, 1803. He also
was a pupil of the Conservatoire, specially under
Daupret, and obtained the first prize in 1823.
He has belonged to all the principal orchestras of
Paris, lived for many years at Argenteuil, and
died there in Sept. 1880. [G.]
ROVEDINO, CARLO, an excellent bass-singer,
born in 1751, appears on the Italian Opera
stage in London as early as 1778, and remained
there, distinguished in serious and comic opera
alike, for many years. He was also greatly in
request for concerts, and his name is frequent
in the best bills of the last decade of the century,
both in town and country. He sang at Haydn's
last benefit concert, May 4, 1795. He is said
to have sung in Paris in 1790, and he probably
divided his time between the two capitals.
England, however, was his home; he died in
London, Oct. 6, 1822, and was buried in the
churchyard of Chelsea New Church.
One of his daughters married C.Weichsel, brother
of Mrs. Billington, and leader of the orchestras at
the Italian Opera and Philharmonic. [G.]
ROVELLI. A family of eminent Italian
musicians. GIOVANNI BATTISTA was first violin
in the orchestra of the church of S. Maria Mag-
giore of Bergamo, at the beginning of this cen
tury. GIUSEPPE, his son, was a cellist, born at
Bergamo in 1753, and died at Parma, Nov. 12,
1806. Of ALESSANDRO we only know that he
was at one time director of the orchestra at
Weimar, and that he was the father of PIETRO,
who was born at Bergamo, Feb. 6, 1793, and
received his first lessons, both in violin-playing
and the general science of music, from his grand-
ROWLAND.
183
father. By an influential patron he was sent
to Paris to study under R. Kreutzer, and his
playing attracted much attention there. On
his father's appointment to Weimar he joined
him for a time. At the end of 1814 we find
him at Munich, playing with great applause.
He remained there for some years, and was
made 'Royal Bavarian chamber-musician,' and
' first concerto - player.' In Feb. 1817 he was
playing at Vienna ; there he married Micheline,
daughter of E. A. Forster, and a fine PF. -player,
and in 1819 went on to Bergamo, took the place
once occupied by his grandfather, and seems to
have remained there, suffering much from bad
health, till his death, Sept. 8, 1838. The writer
in the Allg. mus. Zeitung for Dec. 26, 1838,
from whom the above facts have been mainly
taken, characterises his play as ' simple, expres
sive, graceful, noble ; in a word, classical — a
style which takes instant possession of the heart
of the hearer.' In other notices in the same
periodical, he is said to have inherited the pure,
singing, expressive style of Viotti, and practised
it to perfection. Molique was his pupil at
Munich. [G.]
ROVESCIO, AL. A term used, in instru
mental music, to express two different things,
(i) An imitation by contrary motion, in which
every descending interval in the leading part is
imitated by an ascending one, and vice versa ;
see Moscheles's Etude 'La Forza,' op. 51. (2)
A phrase or piece which may be played back
wards throughout. It is then synonymous with
CANCRIZANS. An interesting example occurs in
the minuet of a Sonata for PF. and violin by
Haydn, in which, on the repetition after the
Trio, the minuet is played backwards, so as to
end on the first note, Haydn's indication being
Menuetto D.O. wird zurucltgespielt. [See RECTE
ET RETRO.]
Menuetto al Rovescii
?.
j
,
! ! '
' J
—
! J J
JL ^
i a, •
el
1 • ^ ! •
H
C /
>
^-^
|| •
S *
»
a •
/\ 'f^\ *
4
1* •
22 •
/^v,
•
f-^ •
• • •
P
<S?! . 1
Zj
•
1 ?
,
.
£> H
-tS<-
:
:.i
_
1
-«
»- 1
>
I f"
• • f '
A
f- f1 +-
1
•-
r -
|
| '
to » i =3
II
K -Jt-Jt— _h£_
»
j P_
1 1 ' -
=F— R1 1
-__._
±na
• — <
-^- J- .
(
^'•— fj
J— J «sL ^J 1- .- ^J- 1 !l
M
\
'
4=i
t
f*^^ "
fr •
—t~-
_» p_ • * -
!j — l—^-^ •
f
i i
& -^
s>- -*- ^:
— -i- -F -
i i
• • -•- -*- "f1
i r i
E
A !• t 1
1
B
t
•
• • i
— j
.J- . .
, 1 — L. 1 w 1
ROWLAND, ALEXANDER CAMPBELL, born at
Trinidad, W. I., Jan. i, 1826. His father served
as bandmaster through the Peninsular campaign,
was a fine clarinet player, and good practical
musician. The lad was brought to London at
a very early age, in 1831 began to learn the
violin and side-drum, and in 1833 entered the
orchestra of the Queen's Theatre, as player on
[F.T.]
both instruments, and soon became known for
his solos at the Lent Oratorios, the Promenade
and other Concerts, and other occasions. In
1839 he had the honour of some special hints
from Spohr as to the drum part in his Concertino
' Sonst und Jetzt,' at the Norwich Festival. (See
Spohr's Autobiography, part i. p. 220.) From
1842 to 1846 he was a member of Jullien's band,
184
EOWLAND.
playing cornet, timpani, and viola, all which, as
well as the pianoforte and organ, he had added
to the repertoire of his instruments. At this
time, with characteristic energy, he learned
scoring for a military band from Waetzig of the
Life Guards, and also mastered the trombone,
and one or two other instruments. In 1846 he
began the double bass, under Casolani, and by
that instrument he is most generally known.
In 1847 he became a member of the orchestras
of the Royal Italian Opera, Philharmonic, Sacred
Harmonic Society, etc.; in 1850 was PF. ac-
companyist, and solo double-bass player at the
National Concerts, and became double-baas at
H.M. Theatre in March 1851. In 1852 he
performed a solo before the Queen and Prince
Albert at Windsor. In 1854, finding the strain
of the constant practice on the thick three-
stringed English bass too severe, Mr. Rowland
retired to Southampton, and devoted himself to
teaching the piano, violin, harmony, and sing
ing, in which he has been very successful up to
the present time. But he did not at once give up
his connexion with London. On April 29, 1861,
he appeared at the Philharmonic Concert, and
performed Mayseder's Violin Concerto (op. 40)
on the double-bass. His position as principal
double-bass to the Society he retained till the
resignation of Sir W. S. Bennett, in 1866, when
he also resigned, and has since confined himself
to his country practice at Southampton.
Mr. Rowland has published the /oth Psalm for
voices and orchestra (Ashdown & Parry) ; the first
part of a Double-bass Tutor (L. Cock & Co.), the
second part of which is now in the press ; also a set
of waltzes composed for and played by Jullien's
band in 1841. He has also composed an overture,
and various vocal pieces which have been per
formed at Southampton, but are not published.
He is the leading professor there, and much
esteemed by the musicians and amateurs of the
place. [G-.]
ROW OF KEYS. A single clavier or manual.
An instrument having two or more rows of keys
is one having two or more manuals. The term
' row of keys ' is, when speaking of an organ, not
applied to a pedal-clavier from the simple fact
that one ' row of keys ' is all that is required by
the feet ; two rows of pedal-keys have, it is true,
been sometimes constructed, but they have
always been found unnecessary, and generally
unmanageable. Harpsichords had often two
rows of keys, one sounding less noisy wires than
the other ; some mechanical change of that sort
being the only means of obtaining a softer or
louder tone in that instrument. [J.S.]
ROYAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC, 1720-
1728. From 1717 to 1720 there was no Italian
Opera in London, but in the latter year a sum of
£50,000 was raised by subscription, and an estab
lishment was founded for the performance of
Italian operas. This was the first Royal Academy
of Music. It consisted of a Governor, a Deputy-
Governor, and 20 Directors. The first governor
was the Duke of Newcastle, the deputy -governor
was Lord Bingley, and the directors included the ,
ROYAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC.
leaders of society at the Court of George I.
Buononcini was invited to England from Rome,
Ariosti from Berlin, and Handel left Cannons and
went to Dresden to engage singers. Under these
brilliant auspices the Academy opened at the
King's Theatre in the Haymarket, on April 2,
1720, with Giovanni Porta's ' Numitor,' and the
following strong cast : — Senesino, Durastanti,
Boschi, and Berenstadt. The season ended on
June 25. It was remarkable for the production
of Handel's ' Radamisto ' and D. Scarlatti's
' Narcisso,' the latter conducted by Roseingrave,
and including Mrs. Anastasia Robinson in the
cast. The second season lasted from Nov. 19,
1720, to July 5, 1721. The new works performed
were ' Astarto ' (Buononcini), ' Arsace ' (a pas
ticcio), ' Muzio Scaevola ' (Ariosti, Buononcini,
and Handel), and ' Giro' (Ariosti). During the
first year of the undertaking £15,000 of the sub
scription had been spent. The third season began
Nov. I, 1721, and ended June 16, 1722. The
new operas were Handel's 'Floridante,' Buo
noncini's 'Crispo' and 'Griselda.' The fourth
season lasted from Nov. 7, 1722, to June 15,
1723, and was remarkable for the first appear
ance in England of Cuzzoni, who sang in Handel's
'Ottone' on Jan. 12. The other new works
(besides ' Ottone *) were Ariosti's ' Coriolano,'
Buononcini's 'Erminia,' and Handel's ' Flavio.'
In the fifth season (Nov. 27, 1723, to June 13,
1724) Buononcini's ' Farnace,' Ariosti's 'Vespa-
siano,' and a pasticcio called ' Aquilio,' were pro
duced. At the end of the season Mrs. Robinson
retired from the stage. The sixth season (Oct.
31, 1724, to May 19, 1725) opened with Handel's
' Tamerlano.' Ariosti's ' A rtaserse ' and 'Dario'
(partly by Vivaldi), Handel's 'Rodelinda,' Buo
noncini's ' Calfurnia,' and Vinci's ' Elpidia' were
the other new works produced. The seventh
season (November 1725 to June 1726) ended
abruptly, owing to the illness of Senesino, but it
was remarkable for the first appearance of the
celebrated Faustina Hasse, who sang in Handel's
'Alessandro' on May 5. Handel's 'Scipione'
was also produced in March. Owing to Sene-
sino's absence, the operas were suspended till
Christmas, and the next season ended on June
6, 1727. Ariosti's 'Lucio Vero/ Handel's
' Admeto,' and Buononcini's 'Astyanax' (the
last of his operas performed at the Academy)
were the chief works ; but the season, although
short, was enlivened by the continual disturb
ances caused by the rivalry between Cuzzoni and
Faustina. The ninth season lasted from Oct. 3,
1727, to June i, 1728. The operas were en
tirely under Handel's direction : his ' Siroe,'
' Tolomeo,' and ' Ricardo I ' were produced, but
the success of the ' Beggar's Opera ' at Lincoln's
Inn Fields Theatre, as well as the continual dis
putes and dissensions amongst the singers, caused
the season to be more than usually disastrous.
At the end of it, the whole sum subscribed, as
well as the receipts, was found to have been
entirely spent. The company was dispersed,
and although a few meetings of the court were
held during the year, the establishment was
EOYAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC.
allowed to die gradually, and was never re
vived.1 [W.B.S.]
EOYAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC. The
original plan for this institution was proposed
by Lord Westmorland (then Lord Burghersh) at
a meeting of noblemen and gentlemen held at
the Thatched House Tavern, London, on July 5,
1822. The proposal meeting with approval, at a
second meeting, July 12, rules and regulations
were drawn up and a committee was appointed
to carry out the undertaking. According to
the rules adopted, the constitution of the new
Academy was to be modelled upon the British
Institution. The king was announced as the
principal Patron, the government was to consist
of a committee of twenty-five Directors and a
sub-committee of nine subscribers, and the school
was to be supported by subscriptions and dona
tions. There was also to be a Board, consisting
of the Principal and four professors, and the
number of pupils was not to exceed forty boys
and forty girls, to be admitted between the
ages of 10 and 15, and all to be boarded in
the establishment. A sub- committee, the mem
bers of which were Lord Burghersh, Sir Gore
Ouseley, Count St. Antonio, Sir Andrew Barnard,
Sir John Murray, and the Hon. A. Macdonald,
was empowered to form the Institution. Dr.
Crotch was appointed the first Principal, and by
September I, the sum of £4312 105. had been
collected, with an annual subscription of £510,
including 100 guineas from George IV., which
has been continued by his successors, William IV.
and Queen Victoria. In November the house,
No. 4, Tenterden Street, Hanover Square, was
taken for the new school, but the opening was
deferred until March 1823, on the 24th of which
month the first lesson was given by Mr. Cipriani
Potter to Mr. Kellow Pye.
The Academy began its labours with the fol
lowing staff:— Head Master — Rev. John Miles.
Governess — Mrs. Wade. Principal— Dr. Crotch.
Board of Professors— Messrs. Attwood, Greatorex,
Shield, and Sir George Smart. Supplementary
members of the Board — Messrs. Horsley and J. B.
Cramer. Professors — Messrs. Anfossi, Andrew,
Bishop, Bochsa, Crivelli, F. Cramer, dementi,
Coccia, Cerruti, Dragonetti, Dizi, Griesbach,
Hawes, Ireland, C. Kramer, Liverati, Lindley,
Loder, Mori, Macintosh, Nicholson, Cipriani
Potter, Puzzi, Ries, H. Smart, Spagnoletti,
Watts, Willmann, and Caravita.2
The Foundation students who were first elected
were the following. Girls — M. E. Lawson, C.
Smith, M. Chancellor, S. Collier, E. Jenkyns,
M. A. Jay, C. Bromley, H. Little, J. Palmer,
C. Porter. Boys— W. H. Holmes, H. A. M.
Cooke,3 A. Greatorex, T. M. Mudie, H. G. Bla-
1 Further information as to the Eoyal Academy of Music will be
found in Burney's History of Music, vol iv, from which the above is
compiled.
2 Although the above was published in the ' Morning Post' as the
st of professors, instruction seems only to have been given by the
following:— Dr. Crotch, Messrs. Lord, Potter, Haydon, Crivelli, F.
Cramer, Spagnoletti, Lindley, Bochsa, Cooke, Caravita, Cicchetti,
Goodwin. J. B. Cramer, Beale, and Finart ; and by Mmes. Biagioli,
Beguandin, and Miss Adams. (See First Beport of the Committee,
June 2, 1823.)
3 Known as ' Grattan Cooke.'
ROYAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC. 185
grove, Kellow J. Pye, W. H. Phipps, A. Devaux,
C. Seymour, E. J. Neilson, and C. S. Packer.
The pupils were divided into two classes, those
on the foundation paying 10 guineas per annum,
while extra students paid 20 guineas, or if they
lodged and boarded in the establishment, 38
guineas. Although the first Report of the Com
mittee (June 2, 1823) was satisfactory, yet finan
cial difficulties soon made themselves felt. In
March, 1824, the Committee reported a deficiency
for the current year of £1600, if the institution
were conducted on the same plan as before. To
meet this, the difference between the students'
payments was abolished, and the fees were fixed
for all at £40, the professors at the same time
giving their instruction gratis for three months.
Lord Burghersh also applied to the government
for a grant, but without effect. In 1825 further
alterations were made as to the admission of
students, by which the numbers amounted in
four months' time to a hundred, and Lord Bur
ghersh made another appeal for a government
grant. In spite of this, the year's accounts still
showed an unsatisfactory financial condition.
During the latter part of the year Moscheles
was included among the staff of professors.
Early in 1826 the increased number of students
compelled the Academy to enlarge its premises,
the lease 4 of No. 5 Tenterden Street was bought,
and the two houses were thrown into one. In
February the government were petitioned for a
charter. In reply it was stated that though
unwilling to give a grant, they were ready
to defray the cost of a charter. In 1827
the financial condition of the Academy was
so disastrous that it was proposed to close
the institution ; but a final appeal to the
public procured a loan of £1469, beside further
donations, enabling the Directors to carry on
the undertaking on a reduced scale and with
increased fees. Henceforward the state of things
began to mend. The charter was granted on
June 23, 1830. By this document the mem
bers of the Academy and their successors were
incorporated and declared to be, and for ever
hereafter to continue to be by the name of the
' Royal Academy of Music/ under the govern
ment of a Board of Directors, consisting of thirty
members, with power to make rules and regu
lations ; a Committee of Management, with full
power over the funds and both students and
professors ; and a Treasurer.
In 1832 Dr. Crotch resigned his post- of Prin
cipal, and was succeeded by Cipriani Potter, who
retained office until his resignation in 1859. r^ne
financial position of the Academy, although not
prosperous, remained on a tolerably secure foot
ing. In 1834, William IV. directed that a quarter
of the proceeds of the Musical Festival held in
Westminster Abbey should be handed over
to the institution. This sum, amounting to
£2250, was devoted by the Committee to the
foundation of four King's Scholarships, to be com
peted for by two male and two female students.
Instead, however, of being invested separately,
« Relinquished in or before 1853.
186 ROYAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC.
the fund was merged in the general property of
the Academy, a mistake which eventually led to
the discontinuance of the scholarships. For the
next ten years the financial condition of the
Academy continued to fluctuate. In July 1853 the
Committee of Management (which was totally
unprofessional in its constitution) summoned
the professors, revealed to them the decline of
the funded property, and asked their counsel as
to the remedies to be adopted. The professors
advised that the management should be made
entirely professional. This course was so far
adopted that a Board of Professors was appointed
to advise the Committee.
The first act of this Board (Sept. 1853)
was to recommend the discontinuance of the
practice of students lodging and boarding on the
premises. This recommendation was adopted,
and since that time the Academy only re
ceives day students. The Board formed in
1853 was disbanded by Lord Westmorland
in 1856, but after his death in 1859, a new
Board was formed ; this, however, found itself
obliged to resign in 1864. Before its resigna
tion it drew up a memorial to government,
praying for an annual grant. After a conference
with a deputation of Professors, Mr. Gladstone,
then Chancellor of the Exchequer, inserted in
the estimates for the year a sum of £500 'to
defray the charge which will come in course
of payment during the year ending March 31,
1865, for enabling the Directors of the Royal
Academy of Music to provide accomodation
for the Institution.' In 1866, upon the change
of Administration, suggestions were made to
the Committee on the part of the govern
ment, and were renewed personally in 1867
by the then Chancellor of the Exchequer,
in consequence of which the Committee was
induced to expend the whole of its funds, in
order to accommodate the institution to the de
signs in which it was invited to participate. In
1867, Lord Beaconsfield (then Mr. Disraeli), in
reply to a question as to the grant, announced
in the House of Commons that ' the Government
were of opinion that they would not be authorised
in recommending any enlargement of the grant,
the results of the institution not being in fact
of a satisfactory character.' This was followed
by the tofrd withdrawal of the grant, in order
(to quote from an official letter addressed to Sir
Sterndale Bennett) ' simply to give effect to the
opinion that it was not so expedient to subsidise
a central and quasi-independent association, as to
establish a system of musical instruction under
the direct control of some Department of Govern
ment.' In this emergency the Committee de
cided to close the establishment. The funds
(including the sum devoted to the King's Scholar
ships) were totally exhausted. The Professors
met in 1868 to consider what could be done, and
generously offered to accept a payment pro ratd.
It was then however announced that the Com
mittee had resigned the Charter into the hands of
the Queen. Upon this the Professors obtained
a legal opinion, to the effect that the Charter
ROYAL ACADEMY OF MUSIC.
could not be resigned without the consent of
every member of the Academy. As many of the
members protested at the time against the re
signation of the Charter, it was returned, and
by great exertions on the part of the Professors,
a new Board of Directors was formed under the
Presidency of the Earl of Dudley, who appointed
a new Committee of Management, in which the
professional element formed an important in
gredient. From the time of this change the in
stitution has continued to prosper. In 1868, on
the return to office of the Liberal Ministry, Mr.
Gladstone restored the annual grant of £500.
In 1876 the number of pupils had so increased,
that the lease of the house adjoining the pre
mises in Tenterden Street had to be repurchased
out of the savings of the institution. This house
was joined on to the original premises, and a
concert-room was formed out of part of the two
houses, which though small has proved a great
boon not only to the students for their regular
concerts, but to many concert-givers for whose
purposes the more extensive rooms of St. James's
Hall, Exeter Hall, etc., are too large. In July
1880 Mr. William Shakespeare was appointed
conductor of the Students' Concerts, vice Mr.
Walter Macfarren.
The following have been the Principals of the
Academy from its foundation to the present
time : — Dr. Crotch (1823-1832), Cipriani Potter
(1832-1859), Charles Lucas (1859-1866), Wil
liam Sterndale Bennett (1866-1875), George
Alexander Macfarren (1875).
The Academy is supported by the Government
grant, subscriptions, donations, and fees from
students. It is under the direction of a Presi
dent (Earl Dudley), three Vice-Presidents (Sir
Thos. Gladstone, Sir T. T. Bernard, and the
Rev. Sir F. A. G. Ouseley, Bt.), and twenty-four
Directors, amongst whom are Sir Julius Benedict,
Sir G. J. Elvey, Professor Macfarren, and Messrs.
Cusins, Garcia, Halle, W. H. Holmes, W.
Macfarren, Osborne, Randegger, and Brinley
Richards. The Committee of Management con
sists of the Principal, Sir Julius Benedict, and
Messrs. Cox, Dorrell, Garcia, Leslie, Low, Lunn,
W. Macfarren, Randegger, Brinley Richards,
Sainton, Sparrow, Wood, and Dr. Steggall. There
are seventy-eight Professors (including assistant
and sub-professors), and the course of instruction
comprises harmony and composition, singing,
pianoforte, organ, harp, violin, viola, violoncello,
double bass, flute, oboe, clarinet, bassoon, horn,
trumpet and cornet, trombone, military music,
elocution, acoustics, and the English, French, Ger
man, and Italian languages. There are also classes
for sight-singing, string quartets, and opera. The
annual fee for the entire course of study is thirty
guineas, with an entrance fee of five guineas, the
only extras being two guineas a term for the
operatic class, and one guinea for the classes
for the study of English, French, German,
Italian, and acoustics. The library of the insti
tution has been noticed in the article on MUSICAL
LIBRARIES (vol. ii. p. 420).
The following are the principal Scholarships
EOYAL SOCIETY OF MUSICIANS.
and Exhibitions offered for competition : — the
Westmorland Scholarship of £10, for female
vocalists between the ages of 18 and 24; the
Potter Exhibition of £12, for male and female
candidates in alternate years ; the Sterndale
Bennett Scholarship, of two years' free education
in the Academy, for male candidates between the
ages of 14 and 21 ; the Parepa-Rosa Scholarship,
of two years' free education in the Academy, for
British-born females between the ages of 1 8 and
22; the Sir John Goss Scholarship of 15 guineas,
awarded triennially to male organists under 18 ;
the Thalberg Scholarship of £20, for male and
female pianists at alternate elections, between the
ages of 14 and 21 ; the Novello Scholarship, of
three years' free education at the Academy, for
male candidates between the ages of 14 and 18 ;
the Lady Goldsmid Scholarship, of one year's free
education in the Academy, for female pianists ;
the Balfe Scholarship for composition, of one
year's free education at the Academy, for British-
born males between the ages of 14 and 21 ;
and the Hine Gift of £12, given annually for
the best English ballad composed by pupils
under 17. In addition to these, several prizes
are offered for competition, and certificates of
merit, silver and bronze medals, are awarded
annually.
Public performances have been given by the
pupils of the Royal Academy at various intervals
from the date of its foundation. Their locality
was sometimes in the Hanover Square Rooms
and sometimes at Tenterden Street. The present
custom is to have two concerts of chamber and
choral music at the Academy, and one orchestral
concert at St. James's Hall every term. From
1828 to 1831 operatic performances were given
in public by the students, but since then they
have been discontinued, the performances of the
operatic class being held privately once or twice
in each term. There is orchestral and choral
practice twice a week throughout the year, at
which pupils have the opportunity of hearing
their own instrumental or vocal compositions
and of performing concertos and songs with
orchestral accompaniments. The number of
pupils has increased from 300 in 1876, to 400 in
1881. [W.B.S.]
ROYAL SOCIETY OF MUSICIANS OF
GREAT BRITAIN, THE, was founded by the
exertions of Festing the violinist, and Weidemann
the flutist, who were struck by the appearance of
two little boys driving milch asses, who proved
to be orphans of a deceased oboe-player named
Kytch. [See FESTING, vol. i. p. 5156.] They
immediately raised subscriptions to relieve the
family, and feeling that some permanent establish
ment was required to meet similar cases, induced
the most eminent music-professors of the day
to associate themselves together as a Society for
that purpose. This excellent work was formally
accomplished on April 19, 1738, and amongst
its first members were Handel, Boyce, Arne,
Christopher Smith, Carey, Cooke, Edward
Purcell, Leveridge, Greene, Reading, Hayes,
Pepusch, and Travers. In 1739 the members
ROYAL SOCIETY OF MUSICIANS. 187
of the Society executed a ' deed of trust,' which
was duly enrolled in the Court of Chancery ; the
signatures of the members, 226 in number, in
clude the most eminent professors of music of the
time. The deed recites the rules and regulations
for membership and for the distribution of the
funds, and provides for regular monthly meetings
at the sign of Saint Martin, in St. Martin's
Lane. Handel took an especial and active in
terest in the welfare of the Society, composing
concertos and giving concerts for the benefit of
its funds, and at his death bequeathing to it a
legacy of £1,000. The Handel Commemoration
held in Westminster Abbey in 1784 brought a
further addition of £6,000. In 1 789 George III.
granted the Society a charter, by virtue of which
its management is vested in the hands of the
'Governors' and * Court of Assistants.' In 1804
the funds of the Society not being in a flourish
ing condition, the king gave a donation of 500
guineas. Considerable sums have been given
or bequeathed to the Society by members of
the music-profession, especially Signora Storace
£1,000, Crosdill £1,000, Begrez £1,000, Schulz
£r,ooo; the latest and largest amount, 1,000
guineas, being that of Mr. Thomas Molineux
(Feb. 10, 1881), now resident in London, but
for many years an eminent performer on the
bassoon and double-bass at Manchester.
The Society pays away annually to relieve
distress over £3,000, which amount is provided
by donations from the public, subscriptions and
donations of members of the Society, and in
terest (about £2,500 per annum) on the Society's
funded property.
Members of the Society must be professional
musicians, and are of both sexes, the Royal
Society of Female Musicians having been affi
liated to the elder institution in 1 866. [See ROYAL
SOCIETY OF FEMALE MUSICIANS.] There is, says
Dr. Burney, * no lucrative employment belonging
to this Society, excepting small salaries to the
secretary and collector, so that the whole pro
duce of benefits and subscriptions is nett, and
clear of all deductions or drawbacks.' The large
staff of physicians, surgeons, counsel, solicitors,
give their gratuitous services to the Society.
The present secretary is Mr. Stanley Lucas, and
the honorary treasurer Mr. W. H. Cummings.
The Society's rooms are at No. 12 Lisle Street,
Leicester Square, and contain some interesting
memorials of music, as well as a collection of
portraits, including Handel, by Hudson ; Haydn ;
Corelli, by Howard ; Geminiani, by Hudson ;
Purcell, by Closterman ; C. E. Horn, by Pocock ;
John Parry, the elder ; Sir W. Parsons ; J. Sin
clair, by Harlowe; Gaetano Crivelli, by Part
ridge; Domenico Francesco Maria Crivelli ; J. S.
Bach, by Clark of Eton ; Beethoven, with auto
graph presenting it to C. Neate ; W. Dance by
his brother ; and a life-size painting of George
III. by Gainsborough. [W. H. C.]
ROYAL SOCIETY OF FEMALE MU
SICIANS, THE, was established in 1839 by
several ladies of distinction in the musical pro
fession, amongst others Mrs. Anderson, Miss
188 ROYAL SOCIETY OF MUSICIANS.
Birch, Miss Dolby, and Miss Mounsey (now Mrs.
Bartholomew), in consequence of the Hoy al Society
of Musicians having made no provision in their
laws for the admission of female members.
Practically it soon became evident that the
co-existence of two separate societies with the
same aim was resulting in considerable loss
of sympathy and support ; and that one ex
penditure would suffice for the management
of both institutions, if they could be amalga
mated. With the consent of the trustees and
members this happy union was effected in
1866, and the two societies have now become
one. [W.H.C.]
EOZE, MARIE, nfa PONSIN, born March 2,
1846, at Paris; received instruction in singing
from Molker at the Conservatoire, and in 1865
gained 1st prizes in singing and comic opera.
She made her debut Aug. 16 of that year at the
Opera Comique as Marie, in He'rold's opera of
that name, and at once concluded an engagement
for the next four years there, during which she
appeared in ' L'Ambassadrice,' 'Joseph,' 'La
Dame Blanche,' 'Le Domino Noir,' ' Fra Dia-
volo,' etc. She created the part of Djalma in
'Le Premier jour de Bonheur' of Auber, at his
request, on Feb. 15, 1868 ; also that of Jeanne in
Flotow's 'L' Ombre,' July 7, 1870. She was
greatly admired at the Ope"ra Comique for her
sympathetic voice and natural charm of person
and manner. Her next engagement was at the
Grand Opera, where she played Marguerite in
' Faust.' At the outbreak of the war she left the
opera for the army, and served with zeal in the
ambulance. After the war she sang for a season
at the Theatre de la Monnaie, Brussels, and on
April 30, 1872, first appeared in England at the
Italian Opera, Drury Lane, as Marguerite, and
as Marcelline in 'Les Deux Journees,' on its
short-lived production, June 20, 1872. The en
suing seasons, until 1877, she passed at Drury
Lane, where she made a distinct success, June 1 1,
1874, as Berengaria in Balfe's 'II Talismano,'
at Her Majesty's, and in the provinces, singing
both in Italian and English in opera or the concert-
room. In the winter of 1877 she made a highly
successful visit to America, returning in 1879 to
Her Majesty's Theatre, where she is now (1881)
engaged. Her parts include Donna Anna, Donna
Elvira, Pamina, Susanna, Alice, Leonora (Verdi),
Agatha, Mignon, Carmen, A'ida,, Ortrud, etc.,
Madame Eoze has been married, 1st to Mr. Julius
Perkins, an American bass singer of great pro
mise, who died in 1875 ; and 2ndly to Mr. Henry
Mapleson. On April 17, 1880, at Mr. Ganz's
orchestral concert, she revived with great success
the ' Divinites du Styx ' from Gluck's ' Alceste '
(last sung here in 1871 by Viardot Garcia), and
an air from Mozart's 'II Re Pastore,' which was
formerly a favourite with Madame Lind-Gold-
schmidt. [A.C.]
RUBATO, lit. 'robbed' or 'stolen,' referring
to the values of the notes, which are diminished
in one place and increased in another. The word
is used, chiefly in instrumental music, to indicate
a particular kind of licence allowed in order to
RUBINELLI.
emphasise the expression. This consists of a
slight ad libitum slackening or quickening of the
time in any passage, in accordance with the
unchangeable rule that in all such passages any
bar in which this licence is taken must be of
exactly the same length as the other bars in the
movement, so that if the first part of the bar
be played slowly, the other part must be taken
quicker than the ordinary time of the movement
to make up for it ; and vice versa, if the bar be
hurried at the beginning, there must be a ratten-
tando at the end. In a general way this most
important and effective means of expression is
left entirely to the discretion of the performer,
who, it need scarcely be said, should take great
care to keep it within due limits, or else the
whole feeling of time will be destroyed, and the
emphasis so desirable in one or two places will
fail of its effect if scattered over the whole com
position. Sometimes, however, it is indicated
by the composer, as in the 1st Mazurka in Chopin's
op. 6 (bar 9), etc. This licence is allowable ia
the works of all the modern ' romantic ' masters,
from Weber downwards, with the single excep
tion of Mendelssohn, who had the greatest dis
like to any modification of the time that he had
not specially marked. In the case of the older
masters, it is entirely and unconditionally inad
missible, and it may be doubted whether it should
be introduced in Beethoven, although many great
interpreters of his music do not hesitate to use
it. [See TEMPO.] [J.A.F.M.]
RUBINELLI, GIOVANNI BATTISTA, cele
brated singer, born at Brescia in 1753, made
his first appearance on the stage at the age of
1 8, at Stuttgart, in Sacchini's 'Calliroe.' For
some years he was attached to the Duke of
Wiirtemberg's chapel, but in 1774 ^e sana a*
Modena in Paisiello's ' Alessandro nelle Indie '
and Anfossi's ' Demofoonte.' His success was
very great ; and during the next few years he
performed at all the principal theatres in Italy.
In 1786 he came to London, after a journey
from Rome by no means propitious. The weather
was unusually severe, and, in going through
France, his travelling chaise was overturned at
Macon; besides which, when approaching Dover,
the boat that landed him was upset, and the
unlucky singer remained for a time up to his chin
in the water. In spite of these perils he made a
successful debut in a pasticcio called ' Virginia,'
his own part in which was chiefly composed by
Tarchi. He next sang with Mara, in ' Armida,'
and in Handel's 'Giulio Cesare,' revived for
him, with several interpolations from Handel's
other works. These are said to have been most
admirably sung by Rubinelli. ' He possessed a
contralto voice of fine quality, but limited com
pass. It was full, round, firm, and steady in slow
movements, but had little agility, nor did he at
tempt to do more than he could execute perfectly.
His style was the true cantabile, in which few
could excel him ; his taste was admirable, and
his science great ; his figure tall and commanding,
his manner and action solemn and dignified. In
short he must be reckoned, if not the first, yet of
RUBINELLI.
RUBINI.
189
the first class of fine singers.' (Lord Mount-Edge-
cumbe.) Burney says that his voice was better
in a church or a theatre, where it could expand,
than in a room ; and continues, ' There was dig
nity in his appearance on the stage, and the
instant the tone of his voice was heard no doubt
remained with the audience that he was the
first singer. His style was grand, and truly
dramatic, his execution neat and distinct, his
taste and embellishments new, select, and mas
terly, and his articulation so pure and well
accented that, in his recitatives, no one conver
sant in the Italian language ever had occasion
to look at the book of the words while he was
singing. Rubinelli, from the fulness of his voice
and greater simplicity of style, pleased a more
considerable number of hearers than Pacchierotti,
though none, perhaps, so exquisitely as that
singer used to delight his real admirers. Rubi-
nelli, finding himself censured on his first arrival
in England, for changing and embellishing his
airs, sang " Return, 0 God of Hosts " in West
minster Abbey, in so plain and unadorned a
manner, that even those who venerate Handel
the most thought him insipid.'
After his season in London he returned to
Italy, where he had enormous success at Vicenza
and Verona, in 1791 and 1792, in 'La Morte de
Cleopatra ' of Nasolini, and ' Agesilao ' of An-
dreozzi. In 1800 he left the stage, and settled
at Brescia, where he died in 1829.
The following lines, some of which are well
known (suggested by the occasion of Carbonelli
the violinist having relinquished the musical
profession to become a wine merchant), bear
witness to the powers and the popularity of
Rubinelli. They are by the Rev. Dr. Wake,
whose quaint spelling has been followed.
Let Rubinelli charm the ear,
And sing as erst with voice divine,
To Carbouelli I adhear,
Instead of musick, give me wine.
And yet perhaps with wine combined,
Sweet musick would our joys improvej
Let both together then be joined,
And feast we as the gods above.
Anacreon-like I'll sit and quaff,
Old age and wrinkles I '11 despise,
Devout the present hours to laugh,
And learn to-morrow to be wise.
[F.A.M.]
RUBINI, GIOVANNI BATTISTA, the most cele
brated of modern tenor singers, was born at
Romano, near Bergamo, on April 7, 1795. The
son of a professor of music, he learned the rudi
ments of his art from his father, and at eight years
old could sing in church choirs and play the violin
in an orchestra. He was then placed as a pupil with
one Don Santo, a priest, organist at Adro, who
however soon sent him home again, saying that
he had no talent for singing. In spite of this, the
father persisted in teaching his unpromising son,
and allowed him, at the age of twelve, to appear
in public at the Romano theatre in a woman's
part. The boy was next engaged at Bergamo as
chorus -singer, and to play violin solos in the
entr'actes. It happened while he was here that
in a new drama that was brought out, an air by
Lamberti, of considerable difficulty, had to be
introduced, for which it was not easy to find
a singer. The song was finally entrusted to
young Rubini, who acquitted himself with much
applause, and was rewarded by the manager
with a present of five francs. In after life he
was fond of singing this song, in memory of
his first triumph. His elation at the time
must have been sadly damped just afterwards
by the refusal of a Milan manager to engage
him as chorus-singer, because of his insufficient
voice.
After belonging for a time to a strolling com
pany, and making an unsuccessful attempt at a
concert tour with a violinist called Madi, he got
a small engagement at Pavia, then another at
Brescia for the Carnival ; he next appeared at the
San Mose theatre at Venice, and lastly at Naples,
where the director, Barbaja (according to Escu-
dier), engaged him to sing with Pellegrini and
Nozzari, in two operas written for him by Fiora-
vanti. (The name of one of these operas, ' Adelson
e Salvina,' is identical with that of an early work
of Bellini's produced about this time.) With the
public Rubini was successful, but so little does
Barbaja appear to have foreseen his future great
ness that he wished to part with him at the end of
the first year's engagement, and only consented to
retain his services at a reduced salary. Rubini
preferred making some sacrifice to leaving Naples,
where he was taking lessons of Nozzari, and he
acceded to Barbaja's conditions, which very soon,
however, had to be rescinded, owing to Rubini's
brilliant successes at Rome (in ' La Gazza ladra ')
and at Palermo. Some time in 1819 he married
Mdlle. Chomel, known at Naples as La Comelli,
a singer of some contemporary celebrity, a French
woman by birth, and pupil of the Paris Con
servatoire.
His first appearance at Paris was on October
6, 1825, in the ' Cenerentola,' and was followed
by others in ' Otello ' and ' La Donna del Lago.'
He was hailed unanimously as ' King of Tenors,'
and began here the series of triumphs which
lasted as long as his stage career. He was still
bound by his engagement with Barbaja, who by
this time had become aware of his worth, and
only yielded him for six months to the Thdatre
I tali en, claiming him back at the end of that
time to sing at Naples, then at Milan, and at
Vienna.
Up to this time his laurels had been won in
Rossini's music, on which his style was first
formed, and it was not till now that he found his
real element, the vehicle most congenial to his
special individuality, and thanks to which he was
to reach the summit of his fame. Rubini was the
foundation and raison d'etre of the whole phase
of Italian opera that succeeded the Rossinian
period. He and Bellini were said to have been
born for one another, and in all probability
Rubini was not more captivated by the tender,
pathetic strains of Bellini, than the sensitive
Bellini was influenced by Rubini's wonderful
powers of expression. Such a singer is an actual
source of inspiration to a composer, who heart, his
190
RUBINI.
own ideas not only realised, but, it may be,
glorified. During the whole composition of 'II
Pirata,' Rubini stayed with Bellini, singing' each
song as it was finished. To this fortunate com
panionship it cannot be doubted that we owe ' La
Sonnambula ' and ' I Puritani.' Donizetti, again,
achieved no great success until the production of
'Anna Bolena,' his thirty -second opera, in which
the tenor part was written expressly for Rubini,
who achieved in it some of his greatest triumphs.
It was followed by ' Lucia,' ' Lucrezia,' ' Marino
Faliero,' and others, in which a like inspiration
was followed by the same result.
Rubini first came to England in 1831, when
freed from his engagement with Barbaja, and
from that time till 1843 he divided each year
between Paris and this country, singing much at
concerts and provincial festivals, as well as at
the Opera, and creating a furore wherever he
went.
His voice — more sweet than 'robust,' save on
the rare occasions when he put forth his full
power — extended from E of the bass clef to
B of the treble, in chest notes, besides com
manding a falsetto register as far as F or even G
above that. A master of every kind of florid
execution, and delighting at times in its display
no one seems ever to have equalled him when he
turned these powers into the channel of emotional
vocal expression, nor to have produced so magical
an effect by the singing of a simple, pathetic
melody, without ornament of any kind soever.
He indulged too much in the use of head-voice,
but ' so perfect is his art,' says Escudier, writing
at the time, ' that the transition from one register
to the other is imperceptible to the hearer. . . .
Gifted with immense lungs, he can so control his
breath as never to expend more of it than is
absolutely necessary for producing the exact
degree of sound he wishes. So adroitly does he
conceal the artifice of respiration that it is im
possible to discover when his breath renews it
self, inspiration and expiration being apparently
simultaneous, as if one were to fill a cup with one
hand while emptying it with the other. In this
manner he can deliver the longest and most
drawn-out phrases without any solution of con
tinuity.' His stage appearance was not impos
ing, for his figure was short and awkward, his
features plain and marked with small -pox. He was
no actor, and seems rarely to have even tried to
act. His declamation of recitative left some
thing to be desired. 'In concerted pieces he
does not give himself the trouble of singing at
all, and if he goes as far as to open his mouth, it
is only to preserve the most absolute silence.'
(Escudier.) ' He would walk through a good
third of an opera languidly, giving the notes
correctly and little more, — in a duet blending his
voice intimately with that of his partner (in this
he was unsurpassed) ; but when his own moment
arrived there was no longer coldness or hesitation,
but a passion, a fervour, a putting forth to the
utmost of every resource of consummate vocal art
and emotion, which converted the most incredulous,
and satisfied those till then inclined to treat him
RUBINI.
as one whose reputation had been overrated.'
(Chorley.) Some of his greatest effects were pro
duced by an excessive use of strong contrasts
between piano and forte, 'which in the last
years of his reign degenerated into the alternation
of a scarcely-audible whisper and a shout.' He
was the earliest to use that thrill of the voice
known as the vibrato (with the subsequent abuse
of which we are all of us too familiar), at first as
a means of emotional effect, afterwards to conceal
the deterioration of the organ. To him too
was originally due that species of musical sob
produced by the repercussion of a prolonged note
before the final cadence, which, electrifying at
first as a new effect, has become one of the com
monest of vocal vulgarisms. But such was his
perfection of finish, such the beauty of his
expression, such his thorough identification of
himself, not with his dramatic impersonations
but with his songs, that his hold on the public re
mained unweakened to the last, even when his
voice was a wreck and his peculiarities had
become mannerisms. He has had one great
successor, very different from himself, in some of
his principal parts, and numberless imitators,
but no rival in the art of gathering up and ex
pressing in one song the varied emotions of a
whole opera, and to this may be due the fact that
he was as much worshipped, and is as affection
ately remembered by numbers who never set foot
in a theatre as by the most constant of opera-
goers.
In 1843 he started with Liszt on a tour through
Holland and Germany, but the two separated at
Berlin, and Rubini went on alone to St. Peters
burg, where he created an enthusiasm verging
on frenzy. By his first concert alone he realised
54,000 francs. The Emperor Nicholas made him
' Director of Singing ' in the Russian dominions,
and a colonel into the bargain.
In the summer of this year Rubini went to
Italy, giving some representations at Vienna by
the way. He returned to Russia in the winter
of 1 844, but finding his voice permanently affected
by the climate resolved to retire from public
life. He bought a property near Romano, where
he passed his last years, and died, on March 3,
1854, leaving behind him one of the largest
fortunes ever amassed on the operatic stage,
which, unlike too many of his brother artists, he
had not squandered. He seems to have been a
simple, kindly-natured man, and letters of his,
still extant, show that he was ready and willing
to assist needy compatriots.
His imitators have brought discredit on their
great original, among those who never heard
him, by aping and exaggerating his mannerisms
without recalling his genius, so that his name is
associated with an impure and corrupt style
of vocalisation. This has helped, among other
influences, in bringing .about the twofold reac
tion, in composers as well as singers, in favour
of dramatic opera, and of vocal declamation
rather than singing, in the sense in which
that word would have been understood by RU'
bini. [F.A.M.]
RUBINSTEIN.
RUBINSTEIN, ANTON GKEGOR, an eminent
composer and one of the greatest pianists the
world has ever seen, was born Nov. 30, 1829, of
Jewish parents, at Wechwotynetz, near Jassy.
He received his first musical instruction from his
mother, and afterwards from a pianoforte -teacher
in Moscow named Villoing. So early as 1839 he
made his first concert- tour with his teacher, jour
neying to Paris, where he made the acquaint
ance of Liszt, who was then teaching in that city,
and under whose advice he there pursued his
studies. A year later he made a more extended
tour, going to England (1842), and thence to
Holland, Germany, and Sweden. In 1845 he
went to study composition with Professor Dehn
in Berlin. From 1846-8 he passed in Vienna
and Pressburg, teaching on his own account.
In 1848 he returned to Russia, where the
Grand Duchess Helen nominated him Kammer-
Virtuos. After studying diligently in St. Peters
burg for eight years he appeared as a fully-
fledged artist with piles of original compositions,
first in Hamburg and then all over Germany,
where he found enthusiastic audiences and will
ing publishers. From this time his fame as
a pianist and composer spread rapidly over
Europe and America. He again visited England
in 1857, and made his first appearance at the
Philharmonic on May 18. In 1858 he returned
home again, gave brilliant concerts in St. Peters
burg, Moscow, etc., and settled in the former
city. At this period he was appointed Imperial
Concert-director, with a life -pension. Thence
forward he worked in conjunction with his late
friend Carl Schuberth, for the advancement of
music in Russia, and had the merit of being the
founder of the St. Petersburg Conservatoire in
1862, remaining its Principal until 1867. The
Russian Musical Society, founded in 1861, was
also his. On leaving Russia he made another
triumphant tour through the greater part of
Europe, which lasted till the spring of 1870.
When in his native country, in 1869, the Em
peror decorated him with the Vladimir Order,
which raised him to noble rank. In 1870 he
rested awhile, and expressed the intention of
retiring from public life ; but it was not likely
that this desire could be fulfilled. He held the
Directorship of the Philharmonic Concerts and
Choral Society in Vienna for the next year or
two, and this was followed by fresh concert
tours. Every year the same threat of retire
ment is made, but the entreaties of the public,
and, probably, the desire of providing for his
wife and family, brings the gifted genius before
us again and again. He has recently extended
his tours as far as the south of Spain, from whence
he hastened back for the funeral of his brother
Nicolas. Of late years he has been threatened
with the loss of his eyesight, a misfortune caused
in some measure by his excessive application to
composition ; such a deprivation, however, would
not prove an overwhelming catastrophe, as his
memory is phenomenal.
Rubinstein's playing is not only remarkable
for the absolute perfection of technique, in which
RUBINSTEIN.
191
he is the only rival Liszt ever had, but there
is the fire and soul which only a true and genial
composer can possess. He can play a simple
piece of Haydn or Mozart so as to positively
bring tears into the eyes of his hearers, but on
the other hand, he will sometimes Jail a prey to
a strange excitement which causes him to play
in the wildest fashion. An example (though
hardly a commendable one) of his perfect mastery
over tone is to be found in his performance of
the Funeral March of Chopin's Sonata in Bb
minor. This well-known piece, regardless of
the composer's intentions, he begins ppp, proceed
ing crescendo, with perfect gradation, up to the
Trio, after which he recommences ff and with
an equally long and subtle diminuendo ends as
softly as he began. As an effect — the idea of
a band passing — this is stale and unworthy of
an artist, but as a tour de force it can only be
justly appreciated by those who have heai'd it
done and then sought to imitate it. It is an
impossible feat.
The compositions of Rubinstein are not yet
sufficiently mellowed by time for us to judge
them fairly. Their style may be considered as
the legitimate outcome of Mendelssohn ; there
is a fine broad vein of melody which is sup
ported by true and natural harmony, and a
thorough technical skill. But there is also the
fatal gift of fluency, and the consequent lack of
that self-criticism and self-restraint which alone
make a composer great. Rubinstein has written
in every department of music, but as yet his
songs and chamber-music are all that can be
called really popular, excepting always his ' Ocean
Symphony,' which is known all over the world.1
This is undoubtedly one of his very best works,
the ideas throughout being vivid and interesting,
while the workmanship shows unusual care.
From the composer's having added an extra
Adagio and Scherzo after the first appearance
of this Symphony we may presume he has a
particular regard for it, though to risk wearying
an audience by inordinate length is scarcely the
way to recommend a work to their favour. The
' Dramatic ' Symphony (op. 95) has been admired,
but is not frequently performed, while of the other
three symphonies the ist and 5th have each only
been performed once in England. His Piano
forte Concertos are very brilliant and effective,
especially that in G (op. 45) ; they will perhaps
in time take a permanent position. His Violin
Concerto (op. 46) is a very fine work, though
but little known. The Persian Songs (op. 34)
are perhaps the most popular of his vocal works,
but there are many very striking and success
ful specimens among his other songs — 'Es
blinkt der Thau' and 'Die Waldhexe' for
instance — and the duets are full of beauty and
passion. The numerous drawing-room pieces
which he has written for the piano are far su
perior to most of their class, his writing for the
instrument being invariably most brilliant, as is
1 First performed in London by Musical Art Union (Klindworth)
May 31, 1861 ; with extra movements, Crystal i'alace, April 12, 1877 ;
Philharmonic, June 11, 1879.
192
RUBINSTEIN.
RUBINSTEIN.
but natural in so great a pianist. His chamber-
music is not yet much known in England, and
he is apt to give the piano an undue prominence
in it; the Quintet in F (op. 55) is almost a
Pianoforte Concerto in disguise. His operas and
oratorios have as yet met with but qualified
success, seeming to lack dramatic force. This
is in some measure due to his antagonism to
the theories and practice of Wagner and the
modern German school. He has a preference
for sacred subjects, which are but ill fitted for
the stage, but as these works are all amongst his
most recent productions it is manifestly impossible
to give any decided opinion as to their eventual
success. The operas not included in the list of his
works with opus-numbers are ' The Demon ' (in
rehearsal at Covent Garden, June 1881), 'Fera-
mors' (Lalla Rookh), 'The Children of the Heath,'
' The Maccabees,' ' Dimitri Donskoi,' and * Nero.'
There are also about a dozen songs, and as
many fugitive pieces for piano without opus-
number, besides some small works published
during the composer's youthful days and reckoned
separately as ops. i-io.
The complete list of Rubinstein's numbered
works is as follows : —
Op.l. 6 little Songs in Low Ger
man dialect. Voice and
PF. Schreiber.
2. 2 Fantasias on Russian
themes. PF. solo. Schrei
ber.
3. 2 Melodies for PF. solo (F
B). Schreiber.
4. Mazourka- Fantaisie. PF.
solo (G). Schreiber.
6. Polonaise, Cracovienne and
Mazurka. PF. solo. Schrei
ber.
6. Tarentelle, -PF. solo (B).
Schreiber.
7. Impromptu-Caprice, ' Hom-
mage a Jenny Lind.' PF.
solo (A minor). Schreiber.
8. 6 Songs (words from the
Russian). Voice and PF.
Senff.
8. Octet in D for PF., V., Vi
ola, Cello, Bass, Fl., Clar.,
and Horn. Peters.
10. Kamennoi-Ostrow. 24 Por
traits for PF. Schott.
1L 3 Pieces for PF. and V. ; 3
do. for PF. and Cello ; 3 do.
for PF. and Viola. Schu-
berth.
12. 1st Sonata for PF. solo (E).
Peters.
13. 1st Sonata for PF. and V(G).
Peters,
14. 'The Ball' Fantasia in 10
Nos. for PF. solo. B. B. 1
15. 2 Trios. PF., V., and Cello
(F, G min.). Hofmeister.
16. Impromptu, Berceuse and
Serenade. PF. solo. Hof
meister.
17. 3 String Quartets (G, C min.,
F). B. &H.2
18. 1st Sonata for PF.and Cello
(D). B.&H.
19. 2nd Sonata for PF. and V.
(A min.). B. & H.
20. 2nd Sonata for PF. solo (C
min.). B. & H.
21. 3 Caprices for PF. solo (Ftt,
D.Eb). B.&H.
22. 3 Serenades for PF. solo (F,
Gmin., Eb). B.&H.
23. 6 Etudes for PF. solo. Pe
ters.
24. 6 Preludes for PF. solo.
Peters.
25. 1st PF. Concerto (E). Pe
ters.
26. Bomance and Impromptu.
PF. solo (F, A minor).
Schreiber.
27. 9 Songs (words from Bus-
sian). Voice and PF.
Schreiber.
28. Nocturne (Gb) and Caprice
(E b) for PF. solo. Kistner.
29. 2 Funeral Marches. PF.
solo.— 1. For an Artist (F
min.); 2. For a Hero (C
min.). Kistner.
80. Barcarolle (F min.); Allo
Appass. (D min.) for PF.
solo. Kistner.
SI. 6 4-part Songs for Male
Voices. Kistner.
32. 6 Songs from Heine. Voice
and PF. Kistner.
S3. 6 Songs. Voice and PF.
Kistner.
34. 12 Persian Songs. V. and
PF. Kistner.
35. 2nd PF. Concerto (F).
Schreiber.
36. 12 Songs from the Bussian.
Voice and PF. Schreiber.
37. Akrostichon (Laura) for
PF. solo. Schreiber.
38. Suite (10 Nos.) for PF. solo.
Schott.
39. 2nd Sonata for PF. and
Cello (G). B.&H.
40. 1st Symphony for Orchestra
(F). Kahnt.
41. 3rd Sonata for PF. solo (F).
B.&H.
42. 2nd Symphony, 'Ocean'
(C). Senff.
43. Triumphal Overture for
Orchestra ( ). Schott.
44. ' Soire~es a St. Petersbourg,'
for PF. solo (6 pieces)
Kahnt.
45. 3rd PF. Concerto (G). B. B.
46. Concerto, Violin and Orch.
(G). Peters.
47. 3 String Quartets (Nos. 4,
6, 6, E min., Bb, D min.).
B. & H.
48. 12 Two-part Songs (from
the Bussian) with PF.
Senff.
49. Sonata for PF. and Viola
(F min.) B. & H.
l B. B. =Bote & Bock. 2 B. i H.=Breitkopf & HarteL
Op. 50. 6 ' Charakter-Bilder.' PF.
duet. Kahnt.
51. 6 Morceaux for PF. Senff.
52. 3rd Trio. PF. and Strings
(Bb). Senff.
53. 6 Preludes and Fugues in
freestyle. PF.solo. Peters
54. 'Paradise Lost.' Sacred
Opera after Milton, in
parts. Senff.
55. Quintet for PF. and Wind
(F). Schuberth.
56. 3rd Symphony (A). Schu-
berth.
57. 6 Songs. Voice and PF.
Senff.
58. Scena ed Aria, ' E dunque
vero?' Sop. and Orcb
Schott.
59. String Quintet (F). Senff.
60. Concert Overture in Bb
Senff.
61. 3 Part-songs for Male Voices
Schreiber.
62. 6 Part-songs for Mixed
Voices. Schreiber.
63. ' Die Nixe.' Alto Solo, Fe
male Chorus, and Orch.
Senff.
64. 5 Fables by Kriloff. Voice
andPF. Senff.
65. 1st Concerto for Cello and
Orch. (A min.). Senff.
66. Quartet. PF. and Strings
(C). Senff.
67. 6 Two-part Songs with PF.
Senff.
68. 'Faust.' Musical portrait,
for Orch. Siegel.
69. 5 Morceaux for PF. solo.
Siegel.
70. 4th PF. Concerto (D min.).
Senff.
71. 3 Morceaux. PF.solo. Sie
gel.
72. 6 Songs for a Low Voice and
PF. Senff.
73. Fantaisie for 2 Pianos (F).
Senff.
74. 'Der Morgen." Cantata for
Male Voices and Orch.
(from the Bussian). Senff.
75. 'Album de Peterhof.' 12
pieces. PF. solo. Senff.
76. 6 Songs for Voice and PF.
Senff.
77. Fantaisie for PF. (E min.)
Senff.
78. 12 Songs from the Eussian.
Voice and PF. Senff.
79. 'Ivan the Terrible.' Musi
cal portrait for Orch. B. B.
80. 'The Tower of Babel.' Sa
cred opera in one act.
Senff. Chappell.
81. 6 Etudes for PF. solo. B. B.
82. Album of National Dances
(6) for PF. solo. B. B.
83. 10 Songs. Voice and PP
B. B.
84. Fantasia for PF. and Orch
(C). Senff.
85. 4th Trio. PF. and Strings
(A). Lewy.
86. Bomance and Caprice for
Violin and Orch. Senff.
87. 'Don Quixote.' Musical
portrait, Humoreske for
Orch. Senff.
88. Theme and Variations for
PF. solo(G). Senff.
89. Sonata for PF. duet (D)
Senff.
90. 2 String Quartets (Nos. 7, 8,
G min., E min.). Senff.
91. Songs and Requiem for
Mignon (from Goethe's
' Wilhelm Meister ') for
Solos, Chorus, and PF
Senff.
92. 2 Scenas for Contralto and
Orchestra. No. 1. 'Hecu
ba'; No. 2. 'Hagar in the
desert.' Senff.
93. 9 Books of Miscellaneous
Pieces (12) for PF. solo.
Senff.
94. 5th PF. Concerto (Eb).
Senff.
95. 4th Symphony, ' Dramatic '
(D min.). Senff.
96. 2nd Concerto. Cello and
Orch. Senff.
97. Sextuor for Strings (D).
Senff.
98. 3rd Sonata. PF. and V. (B
min.). Senff.
99. Quintet. PF. and Strings
G min.). Senff.
100. 4th Sonata for PF. solo (A
min.). Senff.
101. 12 Songs. Voice and PF.
Senff.
102. Caprice Eusse. PF. and
Orch. Senff.
103. Bal costume" Set of charac
teristic pieces (20) for PF.
4 hands. B. B.
104. Elegie ; Variations ; Etude.
PF. solo. B. B.
105. A series of Russian songs.
Voice and PF. B. B.
106. 2 Ptring Quartets (Nos. 9,
10, Ab, Fmin.)
107. 5th Symphony (G min.) In
memory of the Grand-
duchess He'lene Paulowna.
Senff.
Rubinstein's appearance is remarkable. His
head is of a very Russian type, massive and noble,
without beard or moustache, but with a thick
shock of dark brown hair which as yet shows no
gray. In general look his face resembles the
ideal Beethoven of the sculptors. He is well
read, and his very wide travels have given him
much knowledge of men and things. His man
ner is simple and genial, and he has the true
modesty of genius.
We have said that Rubinstein's first visit to
London was in 1842. He was then only just 12.
Mendelssohn and Thalberg were both here, and
the Philharmonic was thus naturally already oc
cupied. No doubt he played in public ; but the
periodicals are silent about him, and the only
printed mention of him to be found is in Mo-
scheles's diary for 1842 ('Leben,' ii. 90), where
he is spoken of by that genial master as 'a rival
to Thalberg ... a Russian boy whose fingers are
as light as feathers, and yet as strong as a man's.'
He did not return to this country till 1857, when
RUBINSTEIN.
he appeared at the Philharmonic on May 18,
playing his own Concerto in G. He came back
in the following year, played again at the Phil
harmonic on June 7, and at the Musical Union
May II. In 1869 he came a fourth time, and
played at the Musical Union only (May 18, June
i). In 1876 he made his fifth visit, played at
the Philharmonic May I, and gave four Eecitals
in St. James's Hall. In 1877 he had again re
citals, and also conducted his ' Ocean ' Symphony
(6 movements), and played Beethoven's Concerto
in G, at the Crystal Palace on June 4. In 1881
he has given another series of Recitals at St.
James's Hall, his opera 'The Demon' was brought
out in Italian at Covent Garden on June 21, and
his ' Tower of Babel,' with other music, at the
Crystal Palace on June n.
Of his Symphonies four have been heard here,
the last (op. 107) at the Crystal Palace, May 1 88 1.
The third Symphony, in A, has not yet been
played in England. Of his PF. Concertos four
out of five have been heard, that in G three
times ; the first alone has not yet been played.
Of his Overtures that in Bb (op. 60), that in C
(op. 43), and that to ' Dimitri Donskoi ' have all
been played at the Crystal Palace, as well as the
Ballet music of ' Feramors ' and ' The Demon/
and ' Don Quixote.' Of his chamber-music the
favourite pieces at the Monday Popular Con
certs are, Cello Sonata in D (6 times), three
pieces for PF. and cello (op. II, 4 times), Bb
Trio (4 times), and PF. Quintet (op. 99, twice).
NICHOLAS, his younger brother, who settled in
Moscow, was also a fine pianist and no mean
composer, though overshadowed by the fame of
his great brother. He studied under Kullak and
Dehn in Berlin during 1845 and 6. In 1859 ne
founded at Moscow the Russian Musical Society,
which gives twenty concerts each year ; and in
1864 the Conservatoire, and was head of both till
his death. In 1861 he visited England, and
played twice at the Musical Union (June 4, 18).
In 1878 he gave four orchestral concerts of
Russian music in the Trocade"ro at Paris with
great success. He died of consumption in Paris,
Mar. 23, 1 88 1, on his way to Nice for his health,
widely and deeply lamented. His latest published
work is op. 17 — 'Scene du Bal, Polonaise/
RUBINSTEIN, JOSEPH— no relation to the
foregoing — has acquired some fame as a pianist
and composer of drawing-room music. He has
also obtained an unenviable notoriety through
certain newspaper articles in the ' Bayreuther
Blatter ' signed with his name (though believed
by some to have emanated from a more famous
pen), and attacking Schumann and Brahms in a
most offensive and vindictive manner. [F.C.]
RUCKERS, clavecin makers of Antwerp,
who were working as masters between 15/9 and
1667 or later, the first of whom, Hans Ruckers,
is always credited with great improvements in
keyboard instruments. It is certain that the
tone of the Ruckers clavecins has never been
surpassed for purity and beauty of tone-colour
(timbre) ; and from this quality they remained in
use in England, as well as in France and the
VOL. in. PT. 2.
RUCKERS.
193
Netherlands, until harpsichords and spinets were
superseded, at the end of last century, by the
pianoforte. The art of harpsichord making, as
exemplified in London by Kirkman and Shudi,
was directly derived from Antwerp and the
Ruckers. Time seemed to have no effect with
the Ruckers instruments. They were decorated
with costly paintings in this country and France,
when a hundred years old and more. New keys
and new jacks replaced the old ones ; so long as
the soundboard stood lasted the 'silvery sweet'
tone. It has done so in some insta.nces until
now, but modern conditions of life seem to be
inimical to the old wood ; it will be difficult, if
not impossible, to preserve any of these old in
struments much longer. As a work of piety we
have catalogued all that we have seen or can
hear of, appending the list to this notice.
In John Broadwood's books, 1772-3, are
several entries concerning the hiring of Ruker,
Rooker, and Rouker harpsichords to his cus
tomers ; to the Duchess of Richmond, Lady
Pembroke, Lady Catherine Murray, etc., etc.
In 1790 Lord Camden bought a ' double Ruker' :
in 1792 Mr. Williams bought another, the price
charged for each being 25 guineas. These entries
corroborate the statement of James Broadwood
('Some Notes,' 1838, printed privately 1862") that
many Ruckers harpsichords were extant and in
excellent condition fifty years before he wrote.
He specially refers to one that was twenty years
before in possession of Mr. Preston, the pub
lisher, reputed to have been Queen Elizabeth's,
and sold when Nonsuch Palace was demolished.
To have been hers Hans Ruckers the elder must
be credited with having made it.
If the tone caused, as we have said, the long
preservation of the Ruckers clavecins, on the
other hand the paintings which adorned them
not unfreqiiently caused their destruction. A
case in point is the instrument of the Parisian
organist, Balbastre, whom Burney visited when
on his famous tour. Burney says it was painted
inside and out with as much delicacy as the
finest coach or snuffbox, he had ever seen. In
side the cover was the story of Rameau's 'Castor
and Pollux,' the composer, whom Burney had
seen some years before, being depicted lyre in
hand and very like. He describes the tone as
delicate rather than powerful (he would be ac
customed in London to the sonorous- pompous
Kirkmans, which he so much admired), and the
touch, in accordance with the French practice of
quilling, as very light. This instrument was
then more than a hundred years old, perhaps more
than a hundred and fifty. We learn the fate
of it from Rimbault ('The Pianoforte,' 1860,
p. 76), who tells us that it became the property
of Mr. Goding of London, who sacrificed Ruckers'
work, to display the paintings by Boucher and
Le Prince that had adorned it, on a new grand
piano made for the purpose by Zeitter. This
maker showed respect for his predecessor by pre
serving the soundboard, which he converted into
a music box, the inscription ' Joannes Ruckers
me fecit Antverpiae ' being transferred to the
194
RUCKERS.
back. This box ultimately became Rimbault's ;
the piano was sold at Coding's sale by Christie
& Manson in 1857.
It was this intimate combination of the deco
rative arts with music that led to the clavecin
and clavichord makers of Antwerp becoming
members of the artists' guild of St. Luke in that
city. They were enrolled in the first instance
as painters or sculptors. We must however go
farther back than Hans Ruckers and his sons to
truly estimate their position and services as cla
vecin makers. For this retrospect the pamphlet
of the Chevalier Le"on de Burbure — ' Recherches
sur les Facteurs de Clavecins et les Luthiers
d'Anvers' (Brussels, 1863), supplies valuable in
formation. We learn that at the end of the 1 5th
and beginning of the i6th centuries, precisely
as in England and Scotland at the same period,
the clavichord was in greater vogue than the
clavecin ; possibly because clavecins were then
always long, and the oblong clavichord recom-
•mended itself as more convenient and cheap for
ordinary use ; just as is now the case with grand
and upright pianos. But about the year 1500
the clavecin had been made in the clavichord
shape in Venice, and called Spinet. [See SPINET.]
This new form must have soon travelled to the
Low Countries, and have superseded the Clavi
chord, as it did in England and France about the
same epoch.
A clavecin maker named Josse Carest was
admitted in 1523 to the St. Luke's guild as a
sculptor and painter of clavichords (literally
' Joos Kerrest, clavecordmaker, snyt en scildert').1
Another Carest had been accepted in 1519 as
an apprentice painter of clavecins (' Goosen
Kareest, schilder en Klavecimbelmaker, gheleert
by Peeter Mathys'). This is an earlier instance
of the name Clavecin than that quoted by M. de
Burbure as the oldest he had found in Belgium,
viz. a house in the parish of Notre Dame, Ant
werp, which, in 1532, bore the sign of ' de Clavi-
zimbele.' No doubt at that time both clavecins
and clavichords were in use in Antwerp, but in
a few years we hear of the latter no more ; and
the clavecin soon became so important that, in
*557» Josse Carest headed a petition of the cla
vecin-makers to be admitted to the privileges of
the guild as such, and not, in a side way, merely
as painters and sculptors of their instruments.
Their prayer was granted, and the ten peti
tioners were exempted from the production of
' masterworks,' but their pupils and all who
were to come after them 2 were bound to exhibit
masterworks, being clavecins, oblong or with
bent sides (' viercante oft gehoecte clavisimbale,'
square or grand as we should say), of five feet
long or more ; made in the workshops of master
experts, of whom two were annually elected;
and to have the mark, design, or scutcheon,
proper to each maker (syn eygen marck, teecken,
1 See 'De LIggeren en andere Historische Archieven der Antwerp-
sche Sint Lucasgilde.' Kombouts en Van Lerius. 2vols. Baggerman,
Antwerp ; Nijhoff, The Hague.
2 Later on, tuners also became members of the guild. For instance,
Michel Colyns, Claversingehtelder. in 1631-2; who was however the
SOB of a member.
RUCKERS.
oft wapene), that is, a recognised trade-mark on
each instrument. We will give these trade
marks of the members of the Ruckers family
from sketches kindly supplied by M. Abel Be"-
gibo, of Renaix in Belgium ; three, belonging to
Hans and his two sons, having been already
published by M. Edmond Vander Straeten in
his monumental work ' La Musique aux Pays
Bas,' vol. in. (Brussels, i875).3 It is at once
evident that such regulations tended to sound
work. The trade-marks we have more particu
larly described under ROSE. They were usually
made of lead, gilt, and were conspicuous in the
soundholes of the instruments.
Some of the cotemporary Italian keyboard-
instruments might be taken to give a general
idea of what the Antwerp ones were like prior
to the improvements of Hans Ruckers the elder.
In the preparation of the soundboards the notion
of the soundchest of LUTE and PSALTERY pre
vailed. Ruckers adhered to this principle, but
being a tuner and perhaps a builder of organs, he
turned to the organ as a type for an improved
clavecin, and while holding fast to timbre as the
chief excellence and end of musical instrument
making, introduced different tone-colours, and
combined them after organ analogies and by
organ contrivances of added keyboards and re
gisters. The octave stop had been already copied
in the little octave spinets which Praetorius tells
us were commonly used to reinforce the tone
of larger instruments, but the merit of Hans
Ruckers, traditionally attributed to him, and
never gainsaid, was his placing the octave as a
fixture in the long clavecin, boldly attaching the
strings to hitchpins on the soundboard (strength
ened beneath for the purpose), and by the addi
tion of another keyboard, also a fixture, thus
establishing a model which remained dominant for
large instruments until the end of the clavecin
manufacture.4
An interesting chapter is devoted to the Euck-
ers family by M. Edmond Vander Straeten in
the work already referred to (vol. iii. p. 325 etc.)
He has gathered up the few documentary no
tices of the members of it discovered by MM.
Rombouts and Van Lerius, by M. Ge"nard and
by M. Le"on de Burbure, with some other facts
that complete all that is known about them.
The name Ruckers, variously spelt Rukers,
Rueckers, Ruyckers, Ruekaers, Rieckers, and
Rikaert, is really a contraction or corruption of
the Flemish Ruckaerts or Ryckaertszoon, equi
valent to the English Richardson. Hans the
elder was certainly of Flemish origin, being the
son of Francis Ruckers of Mechlin. He can
hardly have been born later than 1555. Married
at Notre Dame (the cathedral), Antwerp, June
25, 1575, as Hans Ruckaerts, to Naenken Cnaeps,
he was admitted as Hans Ruyckers, ' clavisinbal-
makerre,' to the Lucas guild in 1579. It ap
pears strange that he was not enrolled a citizen
3 Burney refers to these marks when •writing about the Ruckers.
•* The end of the manufacture for Antwerp is chronicled by M. de
Burbure in one seen by him — he does not say whether single 01
double— made by a blind man, and inscribed ' Joannes Heineman
me fecit A°1795, Antwerp!®.'
RTJCKERS.
RUCKERS.
195
until 1594, but this may have been, as M. de
Burbure suggests, a re-admission, to repair the
loss of a record burnt when the Spaniards sacked
the H6tel de Ville in 1576. In those troubled
times there could have been but little to do in
clavecin-making. May we see in this a reason
for his acquiring that knowledge of the organ
which was to lead ultimately to his remodelling
the long clavecin ?
He had four sons, Francis, Hans, Andries,
and Anthony. It is only with Hans (baptized
Jan. 13, 1578) and Andries (baptized Aug. 30,
1579) that we are concerned, since they became
clavecin makers of equal reputation with their
father. We learn that in 1591 Hans Ruckers
the elder became tuner of the organ in the
Virgin's chapel of the Cathedral, and that in
1593 he added 14 or 15 stops to the large organ
in the same church. In 1598 and 1599 either
he or his son Hans (the records do not specify
which) had charge of the organs of St. Bavon,
and from 1617 to 1623 of St. Jacques. The like
doubt exists as to the Hans who died in 1642.
We believe that this date refers to the son, as
the latest clavecin we have met with of his
make is Mr. Ley land's
beautiful instrument (1.)
dated that year ; the
latest date of the
father's clavecins at
present found being
either 1632 (doubt
ful, see No. 8) or 1 6 14.
The earliest is 1590,
with which date three
existing instruments
are marked. The
trade-mark of Hans
the elder, is here represented.
Of the instruments catalogued below it will be
observed that eleven are probably by Hans the
elder. The long ones are provided with the
octave stop and, perhaps without exception (one
being without details), have the two keyboards
identified with him as the inventor. But it is
interesting to observe the expedients agreeing
with the statement of Prsetorius, that octave
instruments1 were employed with and in the
oblong clavecins. These expedients doubtless
originated before Hans Kuckers ; indeed in the
Museum at Nuremberg, there is an oblong cla
vecin of Antwerp make, signed 'Martinus Vander
Biest,' and dated 1580, that has an octave spinet
in it.a ' Merten ' Vander Biest entered the
Guild in Antwerp, as one of the ten clavecin
makers, in 1558. Now Messrs. Chappell of Lon
don own such an instrument, No. 9 in appended
catalogue, made by Hans Ruckers, certainly the
elder. No keys remain, but the scale of both, the
fixed and movable keyboards is the same, four
octaves marked near the wrestpins si-si (B-B).
In this clavecin it is the left hand keyboard
which is removable and is tuned an octave higher.
In the Museum of the Conservatoire, Brussels,
there is an oblong clavecin by Hans the elder
(No. 4) wherein the octave spinet is above and
not by the side of the fixed one — according to M.
Victor Mahillon a later addition, though the work
of the maker himself. This curious instrument
formerly belonged to Fe"tis, and is dated 1610.
While on the subject of these removable octave
spinets we will refer to one with keyboards side
by side made by Hans the younger (No. 13),
and dated 1619, the property of M. Regibo,
and another, a long clavecin, also by Hans the
younger (No. 26), not dated, belonging to M.
Snoeck of Renaix, that has the octave spinet fixed
in the angle side, precisely as in a more modern
one, made by Coenen of Ruremonde, which may
be seen in the Plan tin museum, Antwerp.
Hans Ruckers the younger — known to the
Belgian musicologists as Jean, because he used
the initials J. R. in his rose, while the father, as
far as we know, used H. R. — was, as we have
said, the second son. M. Regibo has supplied
us with three of his roses.
(2.)
(3.)
We have given the date of his baptism in the married to Marie Waelrant, of the family of the
cathedral in 1578, but have no further details , musician Hubert Waelrant,3 in the cathedral,
to record beyond the ascertained facts that he was Nov. 14, 1604; that either he or his brother
' We hesitate to accept Praetorius' statement literally as to such
spinets being tuned a fifth as well as an octave higher. This more
likely originates in the fact that the F and C instruments had before
his time been made at one and the same pitch, starting from the lowest
key, although the disposition of the keyboards and names of the
notes were different ; as in organs, where pipes of the same measure
ment had been actually used for the note F or the note C. See
Arnold Schlick's 'Spiegel der Orgelmacher,' 1511.
* A woodcut of this rare instrument is given in Part ix. of Dr. A.
Keissmann's 'Illustrirte Geschichte der deutschen Musik,' Leipzig,
1881. Both keyboards, side by side, are apparently original, with
white naturals and compass of 4 octaves C-C. It is the right-hand
keyboard that is tuned the octave higher and is removable like a
drawer. A full description of this double instrument is reproduced
In Reissmann's work, copied from the ' Anzeiger fur Kunde der deut
schen Vorzeit ' (Nuremberg, 1879, No. 9).
3 Dr. John Bull succeeded Rumold Waelrent as organist of the
cathedral In 1617, and retained the post until his death in 1628. He
must have known Hans Ruckers and his two sons well, and been well
acquainted with their instruments.
02
196
RUCKERS.
RUCKERS.
Andries was admitted as a master in the Guild in
161 1 ; and that he was employed to tune the organ
of St. Jacques from 1631 until 1642. There is also
evidence as to his having died in that year, and not
the father, who would seem to have died before.
Mr. Vander Straeten has however brought us
nearer Hans the younger, by reference to Sains-
bury's collection of ' Original unpublished papers
illustrative of the life of Sir Peter Paul Rubens'
(London, 1859, p. 208 etc.), wherein are several
letters which passed in 1638 between the painter
Balthazar Gerbier, at that time at Brussels, and
the private secretary of Charles I., Sir F. Winde-
bank. They relate to the purchase of a good
virginal from Antwerp for the King of England.
Be it remembered that up to this time, and even
as late as the Restoration, all clavecins in England,
long or square, were called Virginals. [See VIR
GINAL.] Gerbier saw one that had been made by
Hans Ruckers the younger ('Johannes Rickarts'),
for the Infanta. He describes it as having a
double keyboard placed at one end, and four stops ;
exactly what we should now call a double harpsi
chord. There were two paintings inside the
cover, the one nearest the player by Rubens ;
the subject Cupid and Psyche. The dealer asked
£30 for it, such instruments without paintings
being priced at £15. After some correspond
ence it was bought and sent over. Arrived in
London it was found to be wanting 6 or 7
keys, and to be insufficient for the music,1 and
Gerbier was requested to get it exchanged for
one with larger compass. Referring to the maker,
Gerbier was informed that he had not another on
sale and that the instrument could not be altered.
So after this straightforward but rather gruff an
swer Gerbier was written to not to trouble himself
further about it. Mr. Vander Straeten enquires
what has become of this jewel ? We agree with him
that the preservation of the pictures has probably
long since caused the destruction of the instru
ment. With such decoration it would hardly re
main in a lumber room. Mr. Vander Straeten
himself possesses a Jean Ruckers single harpsi
chord, restored by M. Ch. Meerens, of which he
has given a heliotype illustration in his work. It
is a splendid specimen of Hans the younger.
Andries Ruckers (the elder, to distinguish him
from his son Andries), the third son of Hans, was,
as we have said, baptized in 1579, and perhaps
became a master in 1611. It is certain that in
1619 a clavecin was ordered from him, for the
reunions and dramatic representations of the
guild and purchased by subscription. As a
member of the confraternity of the Holy Virgin
in the cathedral he was tuning the chapel organ
gratuitously in 1644. His work, spite of Bur-
ney's impression about the relative excellence
of his larger instruments, was held in as great
esteem as that of his father and brother, as the
above-mentioned commission shows. In 1671,
Jean Cox, choirmaster of the cathedral, left by
will, as a precious object, an Andre" Ruckers
clavecin. Handel, many years after, did the
i The Hitchcocks were at this time making spinets in London with
five octaves. G— G.
(5
(6.)
same. Within the writer's recollection there have
been three honoured witnesses in London to this
maker's fame, viz.
Handel's (No. 47),
dated 1651, given by
Messrs. Broadwood
to South Kensington
Museum ; Col. Hop-
kinson's (No. 31)
dated 1 6 14; and Miss
Twining's, a single
keyboard one (No.
'45), dated 1640, still
at Twickenham.2 A
tradition exists that
Handel had also
played upon both the
last - named instru
ments. We do not
know when Andries
Ruckers the elder
died. He was cer
tainly living in 1651,
since that date is on
his harpsichord (Han
del's) at South Kem-
sington. His roses
are here given.
Of Andries Ruckers the younger, the informa
tion is most meagre. Born in 1607, we think he
became a master in 1636. The Christian name is
wanting to the entry in the ledger, but as the
son of a master, the son of Andries the elder is
apparently indicated. The researches of M.
Gdnard have proved the birth of a daughter to
Hans the younger, but not that of a son. It
might be Christopher, could we attribute to him
a master for a father. Regarding him, however,
as living earlier, we are content to believe that
Andries the younger then became free of the Guild;
but as his known instruments are of late date it
is possible that he worked much with his father.
We know from a baptism in 1665 that the younger
Andries had married Catherina de Vriese, per
haps of the family of Dirck or Thierri de Vries, a
clavecin-maker whose
death is recorded in
1628. Fetis (Bio-
graphic universelle,
2nd edit, vii., 346^)
says he had seen a
fine clavecin made by
Andries the younger,
dated 1667. M. Be"-
gibo possesses un
doubted instruments
by him, and has sup
plied a copy of his rose
(7). He has done the same for Christopher Poickers
(8), of whose make he owns a specimen. M. Vander
" This instrument formerly belonged to the Rev. Thomas Twining,
Rector of St. Mary, Colchester, who died in 1804. A learned scholar
(he translated Aristotle's 'Poetics') and clever musician, he enjoyed
the friendship of'Burney and valued highly his favourite harpsichord,
on which the great Handel had played. Mr. Charles Salaman used
both this instrument and Messrs. Broadwood's in his admirable
lectures given in 1855-6 in London and the provinces.
(7
RUCKERS.
RUCKERS.
197
^
Straeten refers to another in the Museum at
Namur. We can
not determine Chris
topher's relationship
to the other Ruckers,
but he might have
been the her Chris-
tofel Ruckers, organ
ist and clockmaker
of Termonde, where
he set up a carillon
in 1549 — possibly a
priest, at least the
title 'her' would in
dicate a person regarded with veneration. The
same writer, in the 5th vol. p. 393 of 'La Musique
aux Pays-Bas,' continues, ' who knows if this
Christopher did not own a workshop for clavecin
making. The priest was everything at that
epoch, and a scholar an organ or spinet builder
seems to us quite natural and normal.'
We will now give the list of the existing Ruckers
instruments, as complete as we have been able
to make it. The kind and never tiring help of
MM. Mahillon, Meerens, and Vander Straeten
of Brussels, and of MM. Snoeck and Re"gibo of
Renaix, as well as of other friends, in compiling
it, is gratefully acknowledged.
Catalogue of Ruckers Clavecins, still existing (iSSi), as far as possible according to date. Extreme
measurements of length and width.
In all the soundboards are painted with devices, generally of fruit, birds, and flowers.
I. HANS RUCKERS DE OUDK (the Elder).
No.
Form.
Dale.
Dimensions.
General Description.
Present Owner.
Source of inform
ation.
ft. in. ft. In.
1
Bent side.
1590
74 by 2 9
2 keyboards, not original ; black naturals ; 4|
Collection of M. Re"gibo,
A. R<5gibo.
octaves, G — E ; finely painted. Rose No. 1.
Renaix.
2
Bent side.
1590
7 9 by 2 10|
2 keyboards, not original; black naturals ; 5oct. ;
Muscle du Conserva
G. Chouquet.
extended by Blanchet.i Inscribed HANS
toire, Paris.
RUCKEHS ME FECIT ANTVERPIAE ; Rose No. 1.
3
Bent side.
1590
2 keyboards ; case ' en laque de Chine' ; 5 stops
Chateau de Pau, France.
Spire Blondel, 'La
'agenouillere.'
Revue Britan-
nique,' Oct. 1880.2
4
Oblong.
1610
57 by 1 7
2 keyboards one above the other ; white naturals ;
Muse'e d« Conserva
V. Mahillon.
4.^ oct. ,C—F each. The upper and octave instru
toire, Brussels.
ment a later addition by the maker. Inscribed
HANS RUCKERS ME FECIT ANTVERPIAE, 1610.
5
Oblong.
1611
56 by 1 74
1 keyboard ; 3j oct., E— C ; case patterned paper.
Muse'e du Steen, Anfr-
E. Vander Straeten
Inscribed JOANNES RUCKERS FECIT ANTVER
werp.
and V. Mahillon.
PIAE, 1611 ; H. R. rose.
6
Oblong.
1614
5 5i by 1 7£
1 keyboard ; 3j oct., E— C ; white naturals.
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
C. Meerens.
7
Bent side.
1614
7 4-jj by 3 3"
2 keyboards ; not original ; 5 oct., etc., F— G ;
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
0. Meereus.
white naturals ; curved bent side and round
narrow end ; 2 genouilleres and a sourdine of
the last century. Rose No. 1.
8
1632
TOD painted. (The date inclines us to attribute
M. De Breyne, Ypres.
E. Vander Straeten.
this one to Hans the Younger) ; the rose is not
described.
9
Oblong.
Un
57 by 1 5}
2 keyboards side by side, the left-hand one re
Messrs. Chappell & Co.,
A. J. Hipkins.
dated
movable, having its own belly and rose. but to be
London.
tuned an 8ve. higher than the fixed instrument ;
no keys left ; 4 oct., B— B. Both stretchers in
scribed JOANNES ROCKERS ME FECIT. 2 roses
No. 1. (See No. 13.) Good paintings. Stand, an
arcade with 6 balusters.
10
Bent side.
74 by 2 7
2 original keyboards ; 4£ oct., C— F (5 keys added);
M. Re"gibo, Renaix.
A. R<§gibo.
white naturals ; 3 stops.
II.
11
Bent side.
1817
68 by 3 7 *
12
Oblong.
1618
2 8} by 1 3
13
Oblong,
1619
74 by 2 7
14
Oblong.
1619
35 by 1 8£
15
Oblong.
1622
67 by 1 74
HANS RUCKERS DE JONGE (the Younger).
2 keyboards ; white naturals,
nis Martin, lately removed.
Paintings in Ver-
M. Pilette, Brussels,
1878, since sold, Hotel
Drouot.
Muse'e du Conserva
toire, Paris.
1 original keyboard ; 3$ oct., E— C ; white
naturals. Inscribed JOANNES RUCKERS FECIT.
Rose No. 2.
2 original keyboards side by side, 4 stops to the M. Re"gibo, Renaix.
fixed one, the other tuned 8ve. higher ; 4i Oct.,
C— F; white naturals. Roses No. 4. (See No. 9.)
1 original keyboard ; 3j oct., E— C ; white natu
rals. Rose No. 2.
1 keyboard ; 4£ Oct., C— F ; white naturals. In
scribed JOANNES RUCKERS FECIT ANTVERPIAE,
1622, and OMNIS SPIRITUS LAUDET DOMINUM.
M. Re"gibo, Renaix.
M. Victor Mahillon,
Brussels.
Victor Mahillon.
G. Chouquet.
A. Re"gibo.
A. Rtfgibo.
V. Mahillon.
1 It is believed by MM. Snoeck, Vander Straeten, Re"gibo, and V.
Mahillon, that few of the Huckers clavecins are of the original
compass of keys. The statements of compass in this list and also in
KEYBOARD should be qualified by this remark. The increase was,
however, made long ago, and in some instances possibly by the
maker himself. M. Vander Straeten, p. 348, has a quoted passage
from Van Blankenburg: 'This was at the time when clavecins had
11 a narrow keyboard. In the present day (1739?) it would be
ifficult to meet with one of this kind ; all the keyboards having
been lengthened.' Again, white naturals are believed to be original
In these instruments. Upon very old alterations it is not easy to decide.
\Ve are of opinion that black naturals and ivory sharps were occa
sionally substituted when the paintings were done. In dealing with
these questions, however, it is best to refrain from generalising ;
many errors having arisen from too hasty conclusions.
2 M. Spire Blondel (Histoire Anecdotique du Piano) mentions a
Ruckers clavecin, painted by Gravelot, as finding a buyer at the
sale of Blondel d'Azincourt. M. du Sommerard in a private letter
refers to one found in a village, probably a Hans Ruckers. There
are more in France, as M. Chouquet has heard of three, but has no
particulars of them to communicate. Enquiry has failed to discover
one in Holland or the Rhenish provinces.
193
RUCKERS.
No.
.Form.
Date.
Dimensions.
General Descriptions.
Present Owner.
Source of inform
ation.
ft. in. ft. in.
16
Bent side.
1627
6 0 by 2 7-i
1 original keyboard ; 4£ Oct., C-E ; white natu
M. Vander Straeten
E. Vander Straeten.
rals ; 2 stops ; Kose No. 4 ; painting inside tup,
Brussels'.
drawn in ' La Musique aux Pays-Bas,' tome 3.
Inscribed as No. 15, and M0SICA DON DM DEI.
17
Oblong.
1628
59 by 1 7£
1 keyboard ; 4} oct., C— F, without lowest C #;
M. L£on Jouret, Brus
V. Mahillon.
appears to have been extended by the maker
sels.
from Sf oct., E— C. A sourdine ' a genouillere.'
18
Bent side.
1630
4 10i by 2 10
2 keyboards ; 4J Oct., G— E ; black naturals ;
Baroness James de
Georges Pfeiffer.
painting inside top said to be by Lancret. In
Rothschild, Paris.
scribed JOANNES ROCKERS ME FECIT ANTVER-
PIAE. Case and top black and gold lacquer,
Chinese. Drawn in ' I/Illustration ' 13 March,
1858, and as frontispiece to Chevalier de Bur-
bure's pamphlet.
19
Bent side.
1632
82 by 3 3
2 keyboards ; 5 oct. and 1 note, F— G ; white
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
C. Meerens.
naturals ; 4 stops ' a genouillere.' Rose No. 3.
20
Bent side.
1637
61 by 2 9i
1 keyboard ; 4^ oct.. A— F ; white naturals. In
John Callcott Horsley,
J. C. Horsley.
scribed as No! 18, with date.
Esq., R.A., London.
21
Oblong.
1638
59 by 1 7
1 keyboard ; 4 oct., etc,, C— D; white naturals.
.11. Snoeck, Renaix.
C. Meerens.
Inscribed as No. 15, with date, and MusiCA
MAGNORUM EST SOLAMEN DULCE LABORUM.
Rose No. 2.
22
Bent side.
1639
59 by 2 ?i
1 keyboard; no keys; 4 stops; Rose No. 4; black
South Kensington Mu
A. J. Hipkins.
and gold case.
seum (gift of Messrs.
Kirkman).
23
Bent side.
1642
7 4£ by 2 8
2 keyboards ; 4% oct., B— D ; 4 stops at the side as
F. R. Leyland, Esq.,
A. J. Hipkins.
originally placed ; Rose No. 4 ; paintings.
London.
24
Bent side.
Un
7 11 by 3 0
2 keyboards ; 5 oct., F — F ; painted outside by
Muse'e du Conserva
G. Chouquet.
dated
Teniers or Brouwer, inside by Breughel and
toire, Paris (Clapis-
Paul Bril. Rose No. 3.
son Collection).
25
Bent side.
71 by 2 7
1 keyboard ; 4£ oct., G— D ; black naturals ; Rose
Mus(5e de 1'Hotel de
A. J. Hipkins.
No. 4 ; blackwood case with incrusted ivory; ac
Cluny, Paris. Cat.
cording to M. du Sommerard, Italian work.
1875, No. 2825.
26
Bent side,
• • •
5 11 by 2 54
2 keyboards ; each 3J oct., E— C ; black naturals ;
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
C. Meerens.
with oblong
2 stops to the bent side instrument and Rose
clavecin at
No. 4 ; to the oblong one, Rose No. 2 ; superbly
tached.
painted. The two instruments together form
an oblong square.
27
Bent side.
• . .
5 11 by 2 7$
4^ oct., C— E ; white naturals ; superb paintings.
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
C. Meerens.
28
Bent side.
t • •
60 by 2 7
1 original keyboard, 4£ oct., C— F ; 5 keys added
M. Regibo, Reuaix.
A. Regibo
in treble ; white naturals ; 3 stops ; Rose No. 2 ;
painting of Orpheus playing a bass viol.
29
Bent side.
1 original keyboard ; 4£ oct., C— F ; 4 keys added
M. Ri5gibo, Renaix.
A. Regibo.
in treble ; Rose No. 3, cut in hard wood.
III. ANDBIES RUCKEKS DE OUDE (the Elder).
M)
31
UDlong,
Bent side.
1613
1614
3 8£ by
7 6 by
1 4$
2 8
32
Bent side.
1615
4 0 by
33
Bent side.
1618
7 4 by
2 10
34
Bent side.
1619
8 10i by
2 10
35
36
Bent side.
Oblong.
1620
1620
510 by
4 1 by
2 8
1 3i
37
Oblong.
1623
5 7$ by
1 7£
38
Bent side.
1623
7 9 by
3 1
39
Bent side.
1624
8 0 by
2 10
40
Oblong.
1626
4 0 by
3 l£
41
Oblong.
1632
5 8 by
1 74
42
43
Oblong.
1633
1634
2 l£ by
1 6
1 keyboard ; 4 Oct., C— C ; white naturals. In
scribed ANDREAS RUCKERS ME FECIT ANTVER-
PIAE, 3613. Belonged to the clavecinist and
carilloneur, Matthias Vanden Gheyn, who put
his mark upon it in 1740.
2 keyboards, not original ; 4£ oct., A— E ; white
naturals ; buff leather, lute and octave stops ;
pedal, not original ; case veneered last century.
Inscribed as No. 30. Rose No. 6. Painting inside
top attributed to Van der Meulen.
Inscribed CONCOKDIA RES . PARVAE . CRESCUNT .
DISCORDIA . MAXIMAE . DILABUNTUR ; was in the
Collegiate Church of St. Jacques, Antwerp.
4j oct., C— F ; white naturals. Inscribed SOLI
DEO GLORIA.
2 keyboards ; 5 Oct., C— C ; the lowest note 8ve.
below cello C ; belly gilt and diapered in Moor
ish style ; painting of Orpheus outside. In
scribed as No. 30, with date. Rose No. 5.
4i oct., C— F ; white naturals ; 4 stops.
1 keyboard ; 3J oct., E— C ; white naturals. In
scribed as No. 30, and inside the top Sic TRAN
SIT GLORIA MDNDI.
1 keyboard ; 4 oct., C— 0 ; -white naturals. In
scribed as No. 30, with date.
2 keyboards ; 5 oct., F— F ; white naturals ; 3
stops ; pedal not original ; case veneered last
century. Rose No. 6.
5 oct., F— F ; 3 stops. Inscribed MUSICA LAE-
TITIAE COMES, MEDICINA DOLORUM.
1 keyboard ; 3i oct. and 2 notes ; at least an 8ve.
added in the last century. Inscribed as No. 30,
and inside top as No. 36. The stand a row of
five balusters.
1 original keyboard to right hand of front ; 4j
oct., C— F ; white naturals. Inscribed inside
top MUSICA . MAGNORUM . SOLAMEN . DULCE .
I/ABORUM. Rose No. 6.
1 original keyboard to left hand of front ; 4 £ oct.,
C— F ; white naturals. Inscribed ANDREAS
RUCKERS FECIT ANTVERPIAE. Hardwood jacks
of double thickness ; painting inside top.
Rose No. 6.
Inscribed ANDEEAS RUCKERS ANTVERPIAE.
Muse'e du Conserva
toire, Brussels.
Colonel Hopkinson,
London.
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
M. Regibo, Renaix.
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
M. Alfred Campo, Brus
sels.
MM. Victor and Joseph
Mahillon, Brussels.
Dr. Hullah, London.
Muse'e Arche'ologique,
Bruges.
M. Regibo, Renaix.
M. Regibo, Renaix.
In a village in Flanders.
V. Mahillon.
A. J. Hipkins.
L6on de Buibure.
p. 26.
C. Meerens.
A. Regibo.
C. Meerens.
V. Mahillon.
V. Mahillon.
H. Holiday.
V. Mahillon.
E.Vander Straetco.
A.
A. Regibo.
E.Vander Straeten.
RUCKERS.
199
Ho.
Form.
Date.1
Dimension*.
General Description.
Present Owner.
Source of inform
ation.
—
ft. in. ft. in.
44
Bent side.
1636
2 keyboards not original ; 5 oct. ; black naturals ;
. . . Dijon, France.
E.Vander Straeten.
stops and legs like Taskin's ; beautifully
painted. Inscribed as No. 30, with date.
45
Bent side.
1640
60 by 2 5
1 original keyboard ; 4 oct., etc., C— D ; white
Miss Twining, Dial
A. J. Hipkins.
naturals. Inscribed ANDREAS KUKERS, 1640 ;
House, Twickenham.
and inside top MUSICA LAETITIAE COMES ME-
DICINA DOLORUM ; inside flap CONCOEDIA Mcsis
AMICA. 2 stops ; Rose No. 6 •, case patt. paper.
46
Oblong.
1644
58 by I 8
1 keyboard ; 4 oct., C— C. Inscribed ANDREAS
M. Victor Mahillon,
V. Mahillon.
BUCKERS, ANNO 1644.
Brussels.
47
Bent side.
1651
68 by 3 0
2 keyboards not original ; nearly 5 oet.. G — F,
South Kensington Mu
A. J. Hipkins.
lowest G$ wanting ; white naturals. Inscribed
seum (gift, as having
as No. 30, with date, and Sic TRANSIT GLORIA.
been Handel's, of
MUNDI, MUSICA DONUM DEI, and formerly
Messrs. Broadwood).
ACTA VIRUM PBOBANT. Concert of monkeys
on the belly, one conducting. Hose No. 6.
48
Oblong.
Un
27 by 1 3J
1 original keyboard placed in the middle ; 4 Oct.,
M. Re'gibo, Renaix.
A. Re'gibo.
dated
C— C ; white naturals. Rose No. 6.
49
Bent side.
...
76 by 2 7
2 keyboards ; the lower 4 oct., etc., B— C, the
Muse'e 'du Steen, Ant
V. Mahillon.
upper 3j oct., E— C ; only one key, a white
werp.
natural, left ; & stops ; no name or rose, but
style of work of A. R. Inscribed OMNISSPIRITCS
LACDET DOMINUM CONCORDIA KES PARVAB
CRESCUNT DISCORDIA MAXIMAE DILABUNTUR.
50
Bent side.
73 by 2 11
2 keyboards, not original ; 5 oct., F— F ; black
Le Baron de G8er, Cha
V. Mahillon.
• • •
naturals ; inscribed as No. 30 ; date of renova
teau de Velu, Fas de
tion, 1758, marked on a jack ; fine paintings.
Calais, France.
K1
iii i
SQ V»IT 1 K.
1 keyboard ; 4ioct., C— F ; white naturals; in
V. Mahillon.
UA
Oblong.
. . •
o by i o
scribed as No. 30.
52
Bent side.
66 by 2 8
2 keyboards ; 4£ oct., B— F ; white naturals ;
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
0. Meerens.
name and rose wanting ; attributed to A. K.
by the work.
53
Oblong.
. . .
S 8 by 1 4
1 keyboard 3J oct.. E— C. Rose No. 6.
M. Snoeck, Renaix.
0. Snoeck.
v^
AJCUU 01UC.
.LWW
55
Bent side.
1656
5 4£ by 2 2£
56
Bent side.
1659
5 10 by 2 4
57
Oblong.
49 by 1 5£
Oblong, I Un- 3 7 by 1
IV. ANDRIES RUCKERS DE JONGE (the Younger).
Case painted in blue camaieu in rococo style ;
attribution to the younger A. R. from the late
date.
1 original keyboard; 4oct.,C— C ; white naturals;
painting inside top. Rose No. 7.
1 original keyboard ; 4oct.,C— C ; white naturals.
Rose No. 7.
1 original keyboard to the left ; 4 Oct., etc., D— E ;
white naturals. Rose No. 7.
V. CHRISTOFEL RUCKERS.
1 original keyboard to the right ; 4 oct., E— E,
without the highest D jj ; white naturals ; Rose
No. 8 ; soundboard and top renewed.
M. Lavignfie (from the
Chateau de Perceau,
pres Cosne).
M. Re'gibo, Renaix.
S. Blondel.
A. Re'gibo,
M. Rfigvbo, Renaix.
A. R6gibo.
M. Re'gibo, Renaix.
A. Re'gibo.
M. Re'gibo, Renaix.
A. Re'gibo.
[A.J.H.]
RUDERSDORFF, HERMINE, born Dec. 12,
1822, at Ivanowsky in the Ukraine, where her
father, Joseph Rudersdorff, a distinguished
violinist (afterwards of Hamburg), was then
engaged. She learned singing1 at Paris from
Bordogni, and at Milan from de Micherout, also
master of Clara Novello, Catherine Hayes, etc.
She first appeared in Germany in concerts, and
sang the principal soprano music, on production
of Mendelssohn's ' Lobgesang ' at Leipzig, June
5, 1840. The next year she appeared on the
stage at Carlsruhe with great success, and then
at Frankfort — where in 1844 s^e Carried Dr.
Kiichenmeister, a professor of mathematics, — and
at Breslau. Her parts consisted of Agatha,
Reiza, Valentine, Isabella, Elvira (Puritani),
etc. From 1852 to 54 she sang at the Friedrich-
Wilhelmstadt Theatre, Berlin, with great success,
in light French operas of Adam, Auber, Boiel-
dieu, Harold, and Thomas, as Juliet (Bellini), and
in new German operas, such as Bertalda in
Lortzing's ' Undine,' etc., besides playing at Aix-
la-Chapelle, Cologne and Dantzic. On May 23,
54, she first appeared in England in German
opera at Drury Lane, as Donna Anna, and was
fairly well received in that and her subsequent
parts of Constance in Mozart's ' Entfiihrung,'
Agatha, Fidelio, and Margaret of Valois, and in
English as Elvira in ' Masaniello.' She took up her
residence in England for several years, only occa
sionally visiting Germany for concerts and festi
vals. She sang at the Royal Italian Opera in
1855, also from 1861 to 65, as Donnas Anna and
Elvira, Jemmy, Bertha, Natalia (L'Etoile du
Nord), etc. ; and in English at St. James's
Theatre for a few nights in Loder's opera,
' Raymond and Agnes.' But it was as a concert
singer that she was best appreciated, her very
powerful voice (not always pleasing), combined
with admirable powers of declamation and cer
tainty of execution, and thorough musicianship
having enabled her to take high rank as a singer
of oratorio. Conspicuous may be mentioned, her
rendering of the opening soprano recitatives in
the ' Messiah ' and of the air following, ' Rejoice
greatly,' and of the final air and chorus in the
' Israel,' especially at the Handel Festivals, when
her voice would tell out with wonderful effect
against the powerful band and choir. In concerts,
whatever she undertook she always showed herself
a thorough artist, being devoted to her art, in
which she worked with untiring industry. This
she proved by her revival of Mozart's fine scenas
' AM lo previdi ' and ' Misera dove son,' and of
200
RUDERSDORFF.
Handel's air from 'Semele,' 'O Sleep,' or by the
introduction in their own tongue of Danish
melodies and the Spanish songs of Yradier.
She was engaged at the Boston festivals of
1871 and 72, and after the latter took up her
permanent abode in the States, where she now
resides. At the Birmingham Festival of 73 she
wrote the libretto of Signer Randegger's cantata
' Fridolin,' founded on Schiller's ' Gangnach dem
Eisenhammer.' She had previously introduced,
in 1869, at the Gewandhaus concerts, Leipzig, the
same composer's scena ' Medea,' which she sang
also at the Crystal Palace and in 72 at Boston.
She has now retired from public life, and devotes
herself to teaching singing. Among her pupils
are Mesdames Anna Drasdil, Emma Thursby,
and Isabel Fassett. [A.C.]
RUDHALL. A family of bell founders of
this name carried on business in Bell Lane,
Gloucester, from 1648 until late in the i8th cen
tury. Its successive members were Abraham,
sen., Abraham, jun., Abel, Thomas, and John.
From catalogues published by them it appears
that from 1648 to Lady day, 1751, they had
cast 2972 bells 'for sixteen cities' and other
places ' in forty-four several counties,' and afc
Lady day 1774 the number had increased to
3594. The principal metropolitan peals cast by
them were those of St. Bride, St. Dunstan in the
East, and St. Martin in the Fields. The most
eminent member of the family was Abraham
junior, who brought the art of bell-casting to great
perfection. He was born 1657, and died Jan. 25,
1736, 'famed for his great skill, beloved and
esteemed for his singular good nature and in
tegrity,' and was buried in Gloucester Cathedral.
His daughter, Alicia, married William Hine, the
cathedral organist. [See HINE, WILLIAM.] The
bells of the Rudhalls were distinguished for their
musical tone. [W.H.H.]
RUDOLPH JOHANN JOSEPH RAINER,
ARCHDUKE of Austria, born at Florence, Jan. 8,
1788, died suddenly at Baden, Vienna, July 24,
1831, was the youngest child of Leopold of
Tuscany and Maria Louisa of Spain. On the
death of the Emperor Joseph II., Feb. 20, 1790,
Leopold succeeded his brother as Emperor Leopold
II., and thus Rudolph received an exclusively
German education. Music was hereditary in
his family. His great-grandfather, Carl VI.,
so accompanied an opera by Fux, that the com
poser exclaimed : ' Bravo ! your Majesty might
serve anywhere as chief Kapellmeister ! ' ' Not
so fast, my dear chief Kapellmeister,' replied
the Emperor ; ' we are better off as we are ! '
His grandmother, the great Maria Theresa, was
a well-educated dilettante, and a fine singer ;
her children, from very early age, sang and
performed cantatas and little dramas, to words
by Metastasio, on birthdays and fetes. His
uncle, Max Franz, was Elector of Cologne,
viola-player, and organiser of that splendid or
chestra at Bonn, to which the Rombergs, Rieses,
Reichas and Beethovens belonged. It was his
father, Leopold, who, after the first performance
of Cimarosa's ' Matrimonio segreto,' gave all those
RUDOLPH, ARCHDUKE.
who took part in the production a supper, and
then ordered the performance to be repeated,-
and it was his aunt, Marie Antoinette, who
supported Gluck against Piccinni at Paris.
Like the other children of the Imperial family,
Rudolph was instructed in music by Anton
Teyber, and tradition says that, as early as
twelve or fourteen he played in the salons of
his friends with credit to himself. In later years
he gave ample proof of more than ordinary musical
talent and taste ; but none greater than this —
that as soon as he had liberty of choice he ex
changed Teyber for Beethoven. The precise date
and circumstances attending this change have
eluded investigation ; but in his I /th year he
received a separate establishment from his elder
brother, then Emperor Francis I. of Austria
(succeeded March I, 1792), as 'Coadjutor' of the
Prince Archbishop Colloredo of Olrnutz. From
the notices of Ries and other sources, it seems
probable that the connection between Rudolph,
a youth of sixteen, and Beethoven, a man of
thirty-four, began in the winter of 1803-4.
Ries relates that Beethoren's breaches of court
etiquette were a constant source of trouble to
his pupil's chamberlains, who strove in vain to
enforce its rules on him. He at last lost all
patience, pushed his way into the young Arch
duke's presence, and, excessively angry, assured
him that he had all due respect for his person,
but that the punctilious observance of all the
rules in which he was daily tutored, was not his
business. Rudolph laughed good - humouredly
and gave orders that for the future he should be
allowed to go his own way.
Beethoven in 1817 told Fraulein Giannatasio,
that he had struck his pupil's fingers, and, upon
Rudolph's resenting the affront, had defended
himself by pointing to a passage in one of the
poets (Goethe ?) which sustained him.
Beethoven's triple concerto, op. 56 (1804),
though dedicated to Prince Lobkowitz, was
written, says Schindler, for the Archduke, Seidler,
and Kraft. The work does not require great
execution in the piano part, but a youth of six
teen able to play it must be a very respectable
performer.
The weakness of the Archduke's constitution
is said to have been the cause of his entering
the Church. The coadjutorship of Olmtitz se
cured to him the succession ; and the income
of the position was probably not a bad one;
for, though his allowance as Archduke in a
family so very numerous was of necessity com
paratively small, yet, in the spring of 1809,
just after completing his 2ist year, he sub
scribed 1500 florins to Beethoven's annuity.
[See vol. ii. p. 59.] In 1818 Beethoven deter
mined to compose a solemn Mass for the in
stallation service of his pupil, a year or two later.
On Sept. 28, 1819, the Cardinal's insignia arrived
from the Pope, and the installation was at length
fixed for March g,1 1820. But the Mass had as
sumed such gigantic proportions thatthe ceremony
1 This date is from the report of the event in the ' Wiener musical-
ische Zeitung ' oi March 25, 1820.
RUDOLPH, ARCHDUKE.
had passed nearly two years before it was com
pleted.1 [See SOLENNIS.] Instead of it, the
music performed was a Mass in Bb, by Hummel ;
a 'Te Deum' in C, by Preindl ; ' Ecce Sacerdos
magnus,' by a ' Herr P. v. R.' ; and Haydn's
Offertorium in D minor. The orchestra was
increased for the occasion to 84 players. What
an opportunity was here lost by Beethoven !
Besides the annuity, Rudolph's purse was
probably often opened to his master; but the
strongest proofs of his respect and affection are
to be found in his careful preservation of Bee
thoven's most insignificant letters; in the zeal
with which he collected for his library every
thing published by him; in his purchase of
the calligraphic copy of his works2 made by
Haslinger ; and in his patience with him, under
circumstances that must often have sadly tried
his forbearance. For Beethoven, notwithstand
ing all his obligations to his patron, chafed under
the interference with his perfect liberty, which
duty to the Archduke-Cardinal occasionally im
posed. There are passages in his letters to Ries
and others (suppressed in publication), as well
as in the conversation-books, which show how
galling even this light yoke was to Beethoven ;
and one feels in perusing those addressed to the
Archduke how frivolous are some of the excuses
for not attending him at the proper hour, and
how hollow and insincere are the occasional
compliments, as Rudolph must have felt. That
Beethoven was pleased to find the Forty Varia
tions dedicated to him by ' his pupil, R. E. H.'
(Rudolph Erz-Herzog), was probably the fact ;
but it is doubtful whether his satisfaction war
ranted the superlatives in which his letter of
thanks is couched. Other letters again breathe
throughout nothing but a true and warm affection
for his pupil. Kochel sensibly remarks that the
trouble lay in Beethoven's 'aversion to the en
forced performance of regular duties, especially
to giving lessons, and teaching the theory of
music, in which it is well known his strength did
not lie, and for which he had to prepare himself.'
When the untamed nature of Beethoven, and
his deafness, are considered, together with his
lack of worldly wisdom and his absolute need
of a Maecenas, one feels deeply how fortunate
he was to have attracted and retained the sym
pathy and affection of a man of such sweet and
tender qualities as Archduke Rudolph.
We can hardly expert an Archduke-Cardinal
to be a voluminous composer, but the Forty
Variations already mentioned, and a sonata for
PF. and clarinet, composed for Count Ferdinand
Troyer, both published by Haslinger, are good
specimens of his musical talents and acquirements.
He was for many years the ' protector ' of the
great 'Society of the Friends of Music ' at Vienna,
and bequeathed to it his very valuable musical
library. He was also extremely fond of engraving,
and several copper plates designed and engraved
i Beethoven announces its completion in a letter to the Archduke
Feb. 27, 1822.
- These, a splendid series of red folio volumes, beautifully copied,
are conspicuous in the Library of the Gesellschal't der Jlusikfreunde
at Vienna.
RUDORFF.
201
Concerto for PF. and Orchestra,
No. 4, in G (op. 58).
Do., do., No. 5, in Eb (op. 73).
Sonata for PF. solo, 'LesAdieux,
I/ Absence, et le Ketour,' in Eb
(op. 81 a).
PF. arrangement of Fidelio (op.
726).
Sonata for PF. and Cello, in G
(op. 96).
by him have been preserved to testify to very
considerable taste and skill in that art.
A son of his, for thirty years past a well-
known contributor to the German musical pe
riodical press, still living (1881), possesses an
oil portrait of his father. It shows a rather
intellectual face, of the Hapsburg type, bub its
peculiarities so softened as to be more than or
dinarily pleasing, and even handsome.3
The Archduke's published works are the two
alluded to above : — Theme by L. van Beethoven,
with 40 variations — for PF. solo (Haslinger) ;
Sonata for PF. and clarinet, op. 2, in A (Has
linger).
Those dedicated to him by Beethoven are as
follows — a noble assemblage —
Trio for PF., V., and Cello, in
Bbfop. 97).
Grand Sonata for the Hammer-
klavier, inBb (op. 106).
Canon, 'Alles Gute.'
Missa Solennis, in D (op. 123).
Grand Fugue for Quartet (op.
133), and 4-hand arrangement of
same.
Song, 'Gedenke mein.'
[A.W.T.]
RUDORFF, ERNST, was born in Berlin Jan.
1 8, 1840 ; his family was of Hanoverian ex
traction. A.t the age of five he received his first
musical instruction from the daughter of Pro
fessor Lichtenstein and god-daughter of C. M. von
Weber, an excellent pianist and of a thoroughly
poetical nature. From his twelfth to his seven
teenth year he was a pupil of Bargiel in PF.
playing and composition. A song and a PF.
piece composed at this period he afterwards
thought worthy of publication (Op. 2, No. I ;
Op. 10, No. 4). For a short time in 1858 he
had the advantage of PF. lessons from Mme.
Schumann, and from his twelfth to his fourteenth
year learned the violin under Louis Ries. At
Easter, 1857, he entered the first class of the
Friedrichs Gymnasium, whence at Easter, 1859,
he passed to the Berlin university. During the
whole of this time his thoughts were bent on
the musical profession. When Joachim visited
Berlin in 1852 Rudorff had played before him,
and had made such a favourable impression that
Joachim advised his being allowed to follow the
musical profession. His father was at first op
posed to this, but at length consented that he
should go at Michaelmas, 1859, and attend the
Conservatorium and the University at Leipzig.
After two terms of theology and history he
devoted himself exclusively to music, and on
leaving the Conservatorium at Easter, 1861,
continued his musical studies for a year under
Hauptmann and Reinecke. The summer of
1862 he passed at Bonn, and returned to Berlin
without any fixed employment beyond that of
cultivating his musical ability. Stockhausen was
then conductor of a choral society at Hamburg.
Rudorff went to him. early in 1864, conducted
those of the Society's concerts in which Stock
hausen himself sang, and finally made concert
tours with him. In 1865 he became professor at
3 For a more detailed notice see the ' Musical World ' April 2, 1881.
202
RUDORFF.
the Cologne Conservatorium, and there in 1867
he founded the Bach Society, whose performance
at their first concert in 1869 caused a great
sensation, and gave such satisfaction to Ru-
dorff himself that he at first refused an ap
pointment as professor in the new Hoch Schule
at Berlin under Joachim's direction. He after
wards changed his mind, and since Oct. 1869 has
been first professor of PF.-playing and director
of the piano classes in that institution, besides
conducting part of the orchestral practices, and
in Joachim's absence directing the public perform
ances. In the summer of 1880, on Max Bruch's
appointment as director of the Liverpool Philhar
monic Society, Rudorff succeeded him as conduc
tor of the Stern Singing-Society in Berlin, but
without resigning his post at the High School.
The surroundings among which Rudorff grew
up were in many respects most favourable. His
father, a pupil of Savigny and a distinguished
professor at the Berlin University, was not only
deeply learned but was endowed with a poetical
mind and a natural gift for music. His mother, a
granddaughter of J. F. Reichardt, and a friend of
the Mendelssohns, was devoted to music. Among
the relations of the family were Tieck, H. Steffens,
and K. von Raumer ; while Achim von Arnim,
Schleiermacher and the brothers Grimm were
intimate friends of his father's and constantly in
the house. The influence of such characters as
these on a boy of intellect and susceptibility is
obvious, and they may be said to have formed
him both morally and intellectually. He himself
has made some not unsuccessful attempts at
literature, of which his essay ' On the Relation
of Modern Life to Nature' (Preuss. Jahrbucher,
1880, p. 261) is a good example.
As a musician he certainly ranks among
the most distinguished of living Germans.
He has much talent for PF.-playing, though an
unfortunate nervousness prevents him from ex
ercising it much in public. His tone is beau
tiful, and his conception poetical, and he pos
sesses considerable power of execution, never
degenerating into display. He is a very good
teacher, and numbers Miss Janotha among
his pupils. But his greatest gifts are shown in
composition. His musical style is founded
throughout upon the romantic school of Chopin,
Mendelssohn and Schumann, and especially of
Weber. There prevails to a considerable ex
tent in Germany a foolish inclination to under
value that great genius on account of some weak
points in his music ; indeed, among the younger
generation of German composers, Rudorff is the
only one in whom we can trace his direct influ
ence, and we owe to him the first edition of the
score of 'Euryan the' (Berlin, Schlesinger, 1866).
In addition to these the genius of Bach has
influenced him powerfully. Rudorff however is
no antiquated Romanticist. There is in Germany
at present a widespread effort to throw off the
romantic style which characterised the first half
of the century. The leader of this movement is
Brahms, who has lately almost openly abandoned
the romantic style. This is not the case with
RUDORFF.
Rudorff; his sentiment is that of the Romanticists.
But he agrees with Brahms in endeavouring to
combine the sentiment of the romantic school
with classical form. In this he has succeeded
better in instrumental than in vocal music.
Rudorff's sentiment is much too complicated to
admit of his producing any really satisfactory
compositions of a kind for which he never
theless has a predilection, viz. unaccompanied
part-songs. His part-songs interest by their
elegance and thoughtfulness, but few, if any,
leave a pleasant impression on the mind. This is
true also of his solo songs. He has an almost
feminine horror of anything rough or common,
and often carries this to such a pitch as seriously
to interfere with simplicity and naturalness.
He has deeply imbibed the romantic charm of
Weber's music, but the bold easy mirth which
at times does not shrink from trivialities is unfor
tunately utterly strange to him. His melodies
are intricate, and so artificially treated as to
avoid natural development. Or they are so in
geniously harmonised as to give to what is really
simple an appearance of singularity; and thus,
owing to his vivid and passionate sentiment, his
compositions often seem overstrained or extrava
gant. To this criticism, however, his earliest
songs (op. 2 and 3) are not open. True, they
follow closely in Schumann's steps, but they
are among the most beautiful that have been
written in his style.
But it is through his instrumental music that
Rudorff will be longest known. He has produced
a number of remarkable and distinguished works;
PF. pieces, a sextet for strings, a romance
for violoncello, etc., two overtures, a serenade,
and variations on an original theme, all for or
chestra ; a ballad for orchestra and a piano
fantasia composed about the same time are
less happy. His first overture — in many re
spects the most charming thing he has written
—fails here and there in respect to structure,
but in his later orchestral works he shows a
complete mastery over forms, from the simplest
to the most complicated. That the sense of form
should be so strong in a nature of so rich
and wide a subjectivity is characteristic of this
composer. In general his talent leads him to
create that which is elegant, dreamy and tender,
rather than that which is manly, powerful, and
impetuous. The choral work with orchestral ac
companiment, 'Der Aufzug der Romanze,' fails
at the beginning and end in those broad decided
forms which are necessary to the style of the
composition ; but the middle part, which treats
of spring and love, is of singular beauty. Through
the ' Gesang an die Sterne ' there breathes that
solemn devotion to nature which was first illus
trated in music by Beethoven.
Rudorff's works are for the most part of great
technical difficulty. This is principally because
the composer, we will not say over -loads them
with detail, but over-elaborates them. This has
kept his works from being as well known as they
deserve. But he is sure to make a name in the
future, even though he should never compose again.
RUDORFF.
Rudorif is however in the prime of life, and there
is happily no prospect of his laying down his
pen. The following is a list of his published
works: —
Op. I, variations for 2 PFs. ; op. 2, six songs ;
op. 3, six do. from Eichendorff ; op. 4, six duets
for PF.; op. 5, sextet for strings; op. 6, four
part-songs for mixed voices ; op. 7, romance for
cello and orchestra; op. 8, overture to 'Der
blonde Ekbert ' for orchestra ; op. 9, six part-
songs for female voices ; op. 10, eight Fantasie-
stiicke for PF. ; op. 1 1, four part-songs for mixed
voices; op. 12, overture to ' Otto der Schiitz' for
orchestra; op. 13, four part-songs for mixed
voices; op. 14, fantasie for PF.; op. 15, ballade
for full orchestra; op. 16, four songs; op. 17,
four do.; op. 18, 'Der Aufzog der Romanze,'
from Tieck, for solos, chorus and orchestra ; op. 20,
serenade for orchestra ; op. 2 2, six 3-part songs
for female voices ; op. 24, variations on an
original theme for orchestra ; op. 25, four 6-part
songs; op. 26, 'Gesang an die Sterne,' by
Riickert, for 6-part chorus and orchestra ; op. 27,
six 4-part songs; op. 27, No. i £tude for PF. ;
No. 2 concert e'tude for do. He has also arranged
Schubert's 4-hand fantasia in F minor (op. 103)
for orchestra. [P.S.]
RUBEZAHL. An opera in 2 acts; words
by J. G. Rhode, music composed by C. M. von
Weber, at Breslau, between October 1804 and
May 1806. Weber's autograph list shows that
the first act contained 15 scenes, the second 12.
Of these pieces of music, however, only 3 have
survived (in MS.) — a Chorus of Spirits, a Recita
tive and Arietta, and a Quintet. Of the overture
(in D minor) only the last 1 1 bars of the first violin
part exist : it was recast into the overture called
' The Ruler of the Spirits.' (See Jahns's List, nos.
44> 45, 46> I22 J Anhang 2, no. 27.) [G.]
RUFFO, VINCENZO, an Italian composer of
the 1 6th century, included by Baini among the
'good musicians' of his 4th Epoch. He is
stated by Fe'tis to have been born at Verona, and
to have become maestro di capella, first of the
cathedral at Milan, and then of that of his native
place. Eitner gives the date of the latter as
1554. Another notice makes him also Maestro di
Capella at Pistoja. Nine separate original pub
lications of his works are mentioned by Fe'tis and
Pougin, embracing a mass ; 2 books of motets ;
i do. of Magnificats ; I do. of psalms ; 4 do. of
madrigals; and ranging in date from 1550 to
1583. The Catalogue of the Fetis Library, how
ever, contains (No. 2213) a book of madrigals,
dated Venice, 1545. The psalms and the mass
are stated in the prefaces (1568, 74) to have been
written for his patron Card. Borromeo, in accord
ance with the decrees of the Council of Trent
(1563). An 'Adoramus' has been reprinted
by Luck, and a madrigal, ' See from his ocean
bed,' for 4 voices, was edited by Oliphant, and is
given in Hullah's ' Part Music, Class A.' The
Library of Ch. Ch., Oxford, has a MS. motet a 3
of his, and the Sacred Harmonic Society (No.
RULE, BRITANNIA?
203
1940) two madrigals.
[G.]
RUGGIERI, the name of a celebrated family
of violin-makers, who flourished at Cremona and
Brescia. The eldest was FRANCESCO, commonly
known as ' Ruggieri il Per ' (the father), whose
instruments date from 1668 to 1720 or there
abouts. JOHN BAPTIST (1700-1725) and PETER
(1700-1720), who form the second generation of
the family, were probably his sons ; and John
Baptist (called ' il buono'), who was indisputably
the best maker in the family, claims to have been
a pupil of Nicholas Amati. Besides these, we
hear of GUIDO and VINCENZO Ruggieri, both of
Cremona, early in the eighteenth century. The
instruments of the Ruggieri, though differing
widely among themselves, bear a general resem
blance to those of the Amati family. They rank
high among the works of the second-rate makers,
and are often passed off as Ainatis. [E. J.P.]
RUINS OF ATHENS, THE. A dramatic
piece (Nachspiel) written by Kotzebue, and com
posed by Beethoven (op. 113), for the opening
of a new theatre at Pesth, February 9, 1812,
when it was preceded in the ceremony by ' King
Stephen' (op. 117). It contains an overture and
8 numbers, and was probably composed late in
1811. The ' Marcia alia turca,' No. 4, is founded
on the theme of the Variations in D, op. 76, which
was composed two years earlier. The March
and Chorus, no. 6, were used in 1822, with
the Overture, op. 124, for the opening of the
Josephstadt Theatre, Vienna. The Overture to
'The Ruins of Athens' and the Turkish March
were published in 1823, but the rest of the music
remained in MS. till 1846. [G.]
RULE, BRITANNIA! The music of this
noble 'ode in honour of Great Britain,' which,
according to Southey, ' will be the political hymn
of this country as long as she maintains her
political power,' was composed by Arne for His
masque of 'Alfred' (the words by Thomson and
Mallet), and first performed at Cliefden House,
Maidenhead, Aug. i, 1740. Cliefden was then
the residence of Frederick, Prince of Wales, and
the occasion was to commemorate the accession of
George I, and the birthday of Princess Augusta.
The masque was repeated on the following night,
and published by Millar, Aug. 19, 1740.
Dr. Arne afterwards altered the masque into
an opera, and it was so performed at Drury Lane
Theatre on March 20, 1745, for the benefit of
Mrs. Arne. In the advertisements of that per
formance, and of another in April, Dr. Arne
entitles 'Rule, Britannia!' 'a celebrated ode,'
from which it may be inferred that it had been
especially successful at Cliefden, and had made
its way, though the masque itself had not been
performed in public. Some detached pieces had
been sung in Dublin, but no record of a public
performance in England has been discovered.
The year 1745, in which the opera was pro
duced, is memorable for the Jacobite rebellion in
the North, and in 1746 Handel produced his
' Occasional Oratorio,' in which he refers to its
suppression, 'War shall cease, welcome Peace,'
adapting those words to the opening bars of
204
RULE, BRITANNIA !
' Rule, Britannia ! ' — in itself a great proof of the
popularity of the air.
War shall cease.
wel - come Peace.
fcfc fynp =;->-•—
ff^-^- =ua
When Britain first
at Heav'n's com - mand
By a singular anachronism, Mr. Schcelcher, in
his 'Life of Handel1 (p. 299), accuses Arne of
copying these and other bars in. the song from
Handel, instead of Handel's quoting them from
Arne. He says also : ' Dr. Arne's Alfred, which
was an utter failure, appears to have belonged
to 1751.' It was not Arne's * Alfred' that failed
in 1751, but Mallet's alteration of the original
poem, which he made shortly after the death of
Thomson. Mallet endeavoured to appropriate the
credit of the masque, as he had before appro
priated the ballad of' William and Margaret,' and
thereby brought himself into notice.1 Mallet's
version of 'Alfred' was produced in 1751, and,
in spite of Garrick's acting, failed, as it deserved
to fail.2
Mr. Schoelcher's primary mistake led him to
search further for resemblances between the
music of Handel and of Arne. He found
for - za avr>.
in Handel, and
Will
slaves.
ia Arne. Not knowing that this cadence was the
common property of the whole world, he imagined
that Arne must have copied it from Handel.
His objections have been answered by Mr. Husk,
Mr. Roffe, and others in vols. iv. and v. of ' Notes
and Queries,' 2nd Series, to which the curious may
be referred. Even the late M. Fetis, who had
Anglophobia from his youth, and who repaid the
taunts of Dr. Burney upon French music with
sneers upon English composers, admits that « Arne
eut du moins le me'rite d'y mettre un cachet par-
ticulier, et de ne point se borner, comme tous les
compositeurs Anglais de cette epoque, a imiter
Purcell ou Hasndel.' M. Fe"tis's sneer at the
other English composers of 'cette e'poque' as
copyists of Handel is quite without foundation.
Handel's music, even with other words, was pub
lished under his name as its recommendation ;
English church musicians would have thought it
heresy to follow any other models than those of
their own school, and English melodists could not
find what they required in Handel. Ballad operas,
Arne's Shakespearian songs, Vauxhall songs, bal-
1 For 'William and Margaret,' with and without Mallet's altera
tions, see Appendix to vol. iii. of ' Roxburghe Ballads,' reprinted for
the Ballad Society ; also an article in No. 1 of the periodical entitled
'The Antiquary.'
2 See Chappell's ' Popular Music of the Olden Time.'
RULE, BRITANNIA !
lads, and Anglo-Scottish songs, were the order of
the day ' a cette e'poque,' and Handel's purse suf
fered severely from their opposition.
The score of ' Rule, Britannia ! ' was printed by
Arne at the end of 'The Judgment of Paris,'
which had also been produced at Cliefden in
1740. The air was adopted by Jacobites as
well as Hanoverians, but the former parodied, or
changed, the words. Among the Jacobite paro
dies, Ritson mentions one with the chorus —
Rise, Britannia! Britannia, rise and fight!
Restore your injured monarch's right.
A second is included in ' The True Loyalist or
Chevalier's favourite,' surreptitiously printed
without a publisher's name. It begins : —
Britannia, rouse at Heav'ns command !
And crown thy native Prince again ;
Then Peace shall bless thy happy land,
And plenty pour in from the main ;
Then shalt thou be— Britannia, thou shalt be—
From home and foreign tyrants free ! etc.
Another is included in the same collection.
A doubt was raised as to the authorship of the
words of ' Rule, Britannia ! ' by Dr. Dinsdale,
editor of the re-edition of Mallet's Poems in 1851.
Dinsdale claims for Mallet the ballad of ' William
and Margaret,' and ' Rule, Britannia ! ' As to the
first claim, the most convincing evidence against
Mallet — unknown when Dinsdale wrote — is now
to be found in the Library of the British Museum.
In 1878 I first saw a copy of the original ballad
in an auction room, and, guided by it, I traced
a second copy in the British Museum, where it is
open to all enquirers. It reproduces the tune,
which had been utterly lost in England, as in
Scotland, because it was not fitted for dancing,
but only for recitation. Until Dinsdale put in
a claim for Mallet, ' Rule, Britannia ! ' had beer
universally ascribed to Thomson, from the adver
tisements of the time down to the •' Scotch Songs'
of Ritson — a most careful and reliable authority
for facts. Mallet left the question in doubt.
Thomson was but recently dead, and consequently
many of his surviving friends knew the facts.
'According to the present arrangement of the
fable,' says Mallet, 'I was obliged to reject a great
deal of what I had written in the other ; neither
could I retain of my friend's part more than three
or four single speeches, and a part of one song.1
He does not say that it was the one song of the
whole that had stood out of the piece, and had
become naturalised, lest his 'friend' should have
too much credit, but 'Rule, Britannia!' comes
under this description, because he allowed Lord
Bolingbroke to mu tilate the poem, by substituting
three stanzas of his own for the 4th, 5th and 6th
of the original. Would Mallet have allowed this
mutilation of the poem had it been his own?
Internal evidence is strongly in favour of Thom
son. See his poems of ' Britannia,' and ' Liberty.'
As an antidote tc Dinsdale's character of David
Mallet, the reader should compare that in Chal
mers's ' General Biographical Dictionary.'
Beethoven composed 5 Variations (in D) upon
the air of ' Rule, Britannia ! ' and many minor
stars have done the like. [VV.C.J
RUMMEL.
EUMMEL. A German musical family, (i)
CHRISTIAN FRANZ LUDWIG FRIEDRICH ALEX
ANDER was bora at Brichsenstadt, Bavaria, Nov.
27> J?^?- He was educated at Mannheim, and
seems to have had instruction from the Abbe*
Vogler. In 1806 he took the post of bandmaster
to the 2nd Nassau infantry, made the Peninsular
Campaign, married in Spain, was taken prisoner,
released, and served with his regiment at Water
loo. He was then employed by the Duke of
Nassau to form and lead his court orchestra,
which he did with great credit to himself till
1841, when it was dissolved. Christian Rummel
died at Wiesbaden Feb. 13, 1849. He was not
only an able conductor and a composer of much
ability and industry, but a fine clarinetist and a
good pianoforte-player. His works are numer
ous, and embrace pieces for military band, con
certos, quintets and other pieces for clarinet,
many pianoforte compositions, especially a so
nata for 4 hands (op. 20) waltzes, variations, etc.
and a Method for the PF. (2) His daughter
JOSEPHINE was born at Manzanares in Spain
during the Peninsular War, May 12, 1812. She
was pianist at the Court at Wiesbaden, and died
Dec. 19, 1877. (3) His son JOSEPH, born Oct. 6,
1818, was educated by his father in music gene
rally, and in the clarinet and PF. in particular,
on both of which he was a good player. He was
for many years Kapellmeister to the Prince of
Oldenburg, then residing at Wiesbaden — a post
in which he was succeeded by Adolphe Henselt.
Up to 1842 he lived in Paris, and then removed
to London for five years. In 1847 he returned
to Paris, and remained there till driven back to
London by the war in 1870 ; and in London he
resided till his death, March 25, 1880. Joseph
Hummel wrote no original music, but he was
one of the most prolific arrangers of operas and
operatic selections for the PF. that ever existed.
For nearly 40 years he worked incessantly for
the houses of Schott and Escudier, publishing
about 400 pieces with each house under his own
name, besides a much larger number under noms
de plume. His arrangements and transcriptions
amount in all to fully 2000. He wrote also a
series of exercises for Augener & Co., and for
Escudier. (4) Joseph's sister FRANZISKA, born at
Wiesbaden, Feb. 4, 1821, was educated by her
father until she went to Paris to study singing
under Bordogni, and afterwards to Lamperti at
Milan. She became principal singer at the
Court of Wiesbaden, and at length married
Peter Schott, the well-known music publisher
at Brussels, whodiedin 1873. (5) Another son,
AUGUST, became a merchant in London, -where
he still lives, and where (6) his son FRANZ was
born, Jan. n, 1853.
FRANZ RUMMEL at the age of 14 went to
Brussels to study the PF. under Brassin, first as a
private pupil and afterwards in the Conservatoire.
He took the first prize for PF.-playing there in
1872, and afterwards became one of the staff of
teachers. He made his first public appearance at
Antwerp Dec. 2 2, 1 8 7 2 , in Henselt's PF. Concerto ;
in July 1873 played the Schumann Concerto at
BUST.
205
the Albert Hall Concerts, London ; and again at
Brussels, before the King and Queen of the Bel
gians, with great distinction. He remained at
the Conservatoire as professor till 1876, when on
the advice of Rubinstein he threw up his post
and began to travel, playing in the Rhine Pro
vinces, Holland, and France. Early in 1877 ne
came to London, and played at the Crystal
Palace on April 7. Next year he went to Ame
rica, where he met with great success, though
interrupted by a serious accident. He returned
in 1 88 1, and played again at the Crystal Palace
on April 30. His repertoire is large, embracing
the works of Tschaikowsky, Raff, Rubinstein,
Liszt, as well as those of the more established
classical masters. [G.]
RUNGENHAGEN, CARL FRIEDBICH. See
SlNGAKADEMIE.
RUSSELL, WILLIAM, Mus. Bac., son of an
organ builder and organist, was born in London
in 1777- He was sucessively a pupil of Cope,
organist of St. Saviour's Southward, Shrubsole,
organist of Spa Fields Chapel, and Groombridge,
organist of Hackney and St. Stephen's, Coleman
Street. In 1789 he was appointed deputy to his
father as organist of St. Mary, Aldermanbury,
and continued so until 1793, when he obtained
the post of organist at the chapel in Great Queen
Street, Lincoln's Inn Fields, which he held until
1798, when the chapel was disposed of to the
Wesleyan body. In 1797 he became a pupil of
Dr. Arnold, with whom he studied for about
three years. In 1 798 he was chosen organist of
St. Ann's, Limehouse. In 1800 he was engaged
as pianist and composer at Sadler's Wells, where
he continued about four years. In 1 801 he was en
gaged as pianist at Covent Garden and appointed
organist of the Foundling Hospital Chapel. He
took his Mus. Bac. degree at Oxford in 1808.
He composed two oratorios, ' The Redemption of
Israel ; and ' Job ' ; an ' Ode to Music/ an ' Ode
to the Genius of Handel,' Christopher Smart's
' Ode on St. Cecilia's day,' and an ' Ode to Har
mony,' several glees, songs, and organ voluntaries,
and about 20 dramatic pieces, chiefly spectacles
and pantomimes. He edited in 1809 'Psalms,
Hymns and Anthems for the Foundling Chapel.'
He was much esteemed both as pianist and
organist. He died Nov. 21, 1813. [W.H.H.]
RUSLAN I LYUDMILA. A Russian
romantic opera, in 5 acts, based on a poem by
Pushkin, the music by Glinka. Produced at
St. Petersburg, Nov. 27, 1842. The scene is
laid in the Caucasus, in fabulous times, and the
music is said to partake strongly of the Asiatic,
oriental, character. The overture was played
at the Crystal Palace, Sydenham, London, July
4, 1874. [G.]
RUST. A distinguished German musical
family. FRIEDRICH WILHELM was born at Wor-
litz, Dessau, July 6, 1739; his father was a
person of eminence, and he received a first-rate
education. He was taught music by his elder
brother, who, as an amateur, had played the
violin in J. S. Bach's orchestra at Leipzig ; and
206
RUST.
at 13 he played the whole of the Well -tempered
clavier without book. Composition, organ, and
clavier he learned from Friedemann and Em
manuel Bach, and the violin from Hockh and
F. Benda; and in 1765, during a journey to
Italy, from G. Benda, Tartini, and Pugnani.
In 1766 he returned to Dessau, and became the
life and soul of the music there. On Sept. 24,
1774, a new theatre was opened through his
exertions, to which he was soon after appointed
music-director. He married his pupil, Henriette
Niedhart, a fine singer, and thenceforward, with
a few visits to Berlin, Dresden, etc., his life was
confined to Dessau, where he died, Feb. 28, 1796.
His compositions include a Psalm for solo,
chorus, and orchestra ; several large Church
Cantatas; DuodramasandMonodramas; Operas;
music to Plays ; Prologues and Occasional pieces,
etc. ; Odes and Songs (2 collections) ; Sonatas
and Variations for the PF. solo — '4 dozen' of
the former and many of the latter — Concertos,
Fugues, etc., etc. ; and three Sonatas for the
violin solo, which have been republished by his
grandson (Peters), and are now the only music
by which Rust is known ; that in D minor has
been often played at the Monday Popular Con
certs. His last composition was a violin sonata
for the E string, thus anticipating Paganini.
A list of his works, with every detail of his life,
extending to 6| large pages, is given in Mendel.
His eldest son was drowned; the youngest,
WILHELM KARL, born at Dessau, April 29,
3787, began music very early ; and besides the
teaching he naturally got at home, learned
thorough-bass with Turk while at Halle Uni
versity. In Dec. 1807 he went to Vienna, and
in time became intimate with Beethoven, who
praised his playing of Bach, and recommended
him strongly as a teacher. Amongst other
pupils he had Baroness Ertmann and Maximi
lian Brentano. His letters to his sister on Bee
thoven are very interesting, and are given by
Thayer, iii. 35-6. He remained in Vienna till
1827, when he returned to his native place, and
lived there, teaching and making music, much
beloved and sought after till his death, April
1 8, 1855. His memory appears to have been
extraordinarily retentive and accurate, and an
anecdote is given by his nephew in Mendel of
his recollecting a composition of Palestrina's after
48 years. He published little or nothing.
WILHELM RUST is the son of Karl Ludwig,
brother of the foregoing, himself an advocate,
and fine amateur-player on both violin and PF.
Wilhelm was born Aug. 15, 1822, at Dessau;
he learned music from his uncle, Wilhelm Karl,
and F. Schneider. After a few years wandering
he settled in Berlin, where he soon joined the
Singakademie. He played at the Philharmonic
Society of Berlin, Dec. 5, 1849, and was soon
much in request as a teacher. In Jan. 1861 he
became organist of the St. Luke's church, and
twelvemonths afterwards director of Vierling's
Bach Society, which he conducted till 1874,
performing a large number of fine works by Bach
and other great composers, many of them for
RYAN.
the first time. The list of occasional concerts
conducted by him is also very large. With
1870 he undertook the department of counter
point and composition in the Stern Conserva
tor! um at Berlin, and in 1879 succeeded E.
F. E. Richter as Cantor of the St. Thomas
school, Leipzig, where he now resides. He
has been long connected with the Leipzig Bach-
gesellschaft, and has edited vols. v, vii, ix — xxiii,
and xxv. His original works have reached op.
33, of which eight are for the PF. and the rest
for voices. [G.l
RUY BLAS. A play by Victor Hugo, to
which Mendelssohn composed an Overture, and
a Chorus for soprano voices and orchestra. The
Overture (op. 95), is in C minor, and the Chorus
(op. 77, no. 3) in A. Both pieces were conceived,
written, copied, rehearsed, and executed, in less
than a week (see Letter, March 18, 1839). The
first performance was Monday, March u, 1839.
Mendelssohn brought it to London in MS. in
1844, and it was tried at a Philharmonic Ee-
hearsal, but for some reason was not performed
till a concert of Mrs. Anderson's, May 25, 1849,
and is now in the library at Buckingham Palace.
The MS. differs inafew passages from the published
score, which was not printed till after Mendels
sohn's death (No. 5 of the posth. works). [G.]
RUZICKA,1 WENZEL, deserves a corner for
his connexion with Schubert. He was born at
Jarmeritz in Moravia, where his father was
schoolmaster, Sept. 8, 1758, and died at Vienna,
July 21, 1823. At 14 he was sent to Vienna to
support himself by music, which he did, con
triving at the same time to make himself a
thorough proficient in the rules of composition.
In 1783 he was playing the violin, and in 1797
the viola, at the Hofburg theatre. He then
appears to have gone to Veszprim in Hungary,
and become chorus-master and military band
master, and to have put, or assisted to put, the
famous Rakoczy march into its present shape.
And there he composed his one large work, an
opera, ' Bela futiCs,' which was first performed at
Pesth, Feb. 22, 1862, and holds a high place in
Hungary. On Dec. I, 1792, he was made Ad
junct, and on April i, 1793, First organist to the
Court at Vienna, a post which he held till his
death. He had a great reputation as a teacher
of composition, and when Salieri discovered
Schubert's easy aptitude for music he handed
him to Ruzicka for instruction. Ruzicka, how
ever, did not keep the lad long, but returned him,
saying much as Holzer had done before him.
' He knows everything already, God Almighty
has taught him.' — A sonata of Ruzicka's for PF.
and violin is published by Mechetti. [&]
RYAN, MICHAEL DESMOND, dramatic and
musical critic, was born at Kilkenny, March 3,
1 8 1 6, one of the numerous offspring of Dr. Michael
Ryan, a physician of some position in the county.
On the completion of his academical education at
an early age, he entered the University of Edin
burgh, early in the year 1832, for the purpose
1 Spelt also Kucsicska, Kutschitschka. etc.
EYAN.
of studying medicine. He remained in Edin
burgh steadily pursuing his studies for some
three years, and had made satisfactory progress
until it came to the dissecting room, at which
his sensitive nature revolted. Being fairly well
read, a dabbler in literature, an enthusiastic
admirer of art, a good amateur musician, and
a keen follower of the stage, Mr. Ryan deter
mined to quit Edinburgh and try his fortune in
London. Here he arrived in 1836, by chance
met with Mr. J. W. Davison, and commenced an
intimate friendship winch lasted until dissolved
by death. Mr. Ryan now entered upon his
literary career in earnest, writing articles and
poems for Harrison's Miscellany, etc., and pro
ducing verses for songs, original and translated,
in teeming abundance. His 'Christopher among
the Mountains,' in which he satirised Professor
Wilson's criticism upon the last canto of ' Childe
Harold,' and his parody of the ' Noctes Am-
brosianse,' were among his first ambitious efforts.
A set of twelve sacred songs, versified from the
Old Testament and set to music by Edward Loder
(D'Almaiae), may also be mentioned. The
' Songs of Ireland ' (D'Almaine), in which, in
conjunction with F. N. Crouch, new verses
were fitted to old melodies, is another example
of effective workmanship. In 1844 Mr. Ryan
became a contributor to ' The Musical World,'
and two years later sub-editor, a post which
he filled as long as he lived. For years he
was a contributor to the 'Morning Post,' 'Court
Journal,' 'Morning Chronicle,' and other peri
odicals, writing criticisms on the drama and
music, which had the merit of being trenchant,
sound, and erudite. In 1849 ^e wrote the
SACCHINI.
207
libretto of ' Charles II.' for Mr. G. A. Macfarren.
The subject was taken from a well-known comedy
by Howard Payne, rendered popular at Covent
Garden by Charles Kemble's acting some quarter
of a century before. A short time afterwards
Mr. Ryan was commissioned by M. Jullien to
provide the libretto of a grand spectacular opera,
on the subject of ' Peter the Great' — brought
out at the Royal Italian Opera on August 17,
1852, under the title of ' Pietro il Grande.' The
fact of the book having been written in English,
and translated into Italian (by Signor Maggioni)
for the performance at Covent Garden, IB a cir
cumstance rare in itself if not absolutely unique.
With the late Mr. Frank Mori, Mr. Ryan col
laborated in an opera called 'Lambert Simnel,'
originally intended for Mr. Sims Reeves, but
destined never to see the light. Of the various
other works, completed or mapped out, which he
produced, nothing need be said ; the name of Des
mond Ryan will be best remembered as that of an
intelligent critic, whose judgment was matured
by experience and dictated by a seldom failing
instinct. In 1857 he formed his first association
with the 'Morning Herald,' and its satellite,
the ' Standard,' and became permanently con
nected with those journals in 1862, as musical
and dramatic critic. Few temperaments, how
ever, can sustain the excitement and toil de
manded in these days of newspaper activity, and
after a painful and prolonged illness, Mr. Ryan
quitted this life on Dec. 8, 1868, followed to the
grave by the regretful memories of those who
had known and esteemed his character. Des
mond Ryan was twice married, and left to mourn
him a widow and eight children. [D. L. R.]
S.
Q ACCHINI, ANTONIO MARIA GASPARE, born
^ at Pozzuoli, near Naples, on July 23, 1734.
This 'graceful, elegant, and judicious com
poser ' as Burney calls him, who enjoyed great
contemporary fame, and was very popular in this
country, was the son of poor fisherpeople who had
no idea of bringing him up to any life but their
own. It chanced however that Durante heard
the boy sing some popular airs, and was so much
struck with his voice and talent that he got him
admitted into the Conservatorio of San Onofrio,
at Naples. Here he learned the violin from Nic-
colo Forenza, and acquired a considerable mastery
over the instrument, which he subsequently
turned to good account in his orchestral writing.
He studied singing with Gennaro Manna ; har
mony and counterpoint with Durante himself,
who esteemed him highly, holding him up to his
other pupils, among whom were Jommelli, Pic-
cinni and Guglielmi, as their most formidable
rival. Durante died in 1755, and in the follow
ing year Sacchini left the Conservatorio, but not
until he had produced an Intermezzo, in two
parts, 'Fra Donate,' very successfully performed
by the pupils of the institution. For some years
he supported himself by teaching singing, and
writing little pieces for minor theatres, till, in
1762, he wrote a serious opera for the Argentina
theatre at Rome. This was so well received
that he remained for seven years attached to the
theatre as composer, writing operas not only for
Rome but many other towns. Among these,
' Alessandro nelle Indie,' played at Venice in 1 768,
was especially successful, and obtained for its
composer, in 1 769, the directorship of the * Ospe-
daletto ' school of music there. He seems to
have held this office for two years only, but
during that time formed some excellent pupils,
among whom may be mentioned Gabrieli, Canti,
and Pasquali.
In 1771 he left Venice, and proceeded by way
of Munich, Stuttgart, and other German towns,
to England, arriving in London in April 1772.
His continental fame had preceded him to this
country, and a beautiful air of his, ' Care luci/
introduced by Guarducci into the pasticcio of
' Tigrane,' as early as 1767, had, by its popular
ity, paved the way for his music. True, a
strong clique existed against the new composer,
but he soon got the better of it. ' He not only
208
SACCHINI.
supported the high reputation he had acquired
on the Continent, but vanquished the enemies of
his talents in England. His operas of the " Cid "
and "Tamerlano," were equal, if not superior, to
most of the musical dramas performed in any
part of Europe ; indeed each of these dramas
was so entire, so masterly, and yet so new and
natural, that there was nothing left for criticism
to censure, though innumerable beauties to point
out and admire.' (Burney.)
In addition to the operas named above, he
produced here ' Lucio Vero ' and ' Nitetti e
Perseo.' His perfect comprehension of the art
of writing for the voice, and the skill with which
he adapted his songs to their respective expo
nents, contributed an important element to the
success of his music, even indifferent singers
being made to appear to advantage. His popu
larity, however, was undermined after a time,
from a variety of causes. Jealousy led to cabals
against him. ' Upon a difference with Rauzzini,
this singer, from a friend, became a foe, declar
ing himself to be the author of the principal
songs in all the late operas to which Sacchini
had set his name, and threatening to make an
affidavit of it before a .magistrate. The utmost
of this accusation that can be looked upon as
true may have been that during Sacchini's severe
fits of the gout, when he was called upon for his
operas before they were ready, he employed
Rauzzini, as he and others had done Anfossi
in Italy, to fill up the parts, set some of the
recitatives, and perhaps compose a few of the
airs for the under singers.' (Burney.) He would
probably have lived down this calumny, prompted
as it was by personal spite, but his idle and
dissolute habits estranged his friends, impaired
his health, and got him deeply into debt, the
consequence of which was that he left this coun
try and settled in Paris — Burney says in 1784;
Fe'tis in 1782. It seems probable that this last
date is correct, as several of his operas were
produced in the French capital during 1783-4.
He had been there on a visit in 1781, when his
( Isola d'Amore,' translated by Frame'ry and
adapted to the French stage, was played there
successfully, under the name of 'La Colonie.'
His 'Olimpiade' is said to have been deprived of
a hearing through the jealousy of Gluck. Burney
says, that in Paris Sacchini was almost adored.
His works were often performed and widely
popular there after his death, but during his life
his luck seems to have been almost invariably
bad. He started with an apparent advantage
in the patronage of Joseph II. of Austria, who
was in Paris at the time, and recommended the
composer to the protection of his sister, Marie
Antoinette. Thanks to this, he obtained a hear
ing for his 'Rinaldo' (rearranged and partly re
written for the French stage as ' Renaud '), and
for ' II gran Cid,' which, under the name of
'Chimene,' was performed before the Court at
Fontainebleau. Both of these works contained
great beauties, but neither had more than a
limited success. ' Dardanus,' a French opera, was
not more fortunate, in 1784. ' (Edipe a Colone'
SACCHINI.
was finished early in 1785. This, his master
piece, brought him his bitterest disappointment.
The Queen had promised that ' (Edipe ' should be
the first opera at the royal theatre during the
Court's next residence at Fontainebleau. The
time was approaching, but nothing was said
about it, and Sacchini remarked with anxiety
that the Queen avoided him and seemed uneasy
in his presence. Suspense became intolerable,
and he sought an audience, when the Queen
unwillingly and hesitatingly confessed the truth.
' My dear Sacchini, I am accused of showing
too much favour to foreigners. I have been so
much pressed to command a performance of M.
Lemoine's "Phedre" instead of your "(Edipe"
that I cannot refuse. You see the situation ;
forgive me.' Poor Sacchini controlled himself at
the moment, but on arriving at home gave way
to despair. The Queen's favour lost, he believed
his only chance gone. He took to his bed then
and there, and died three months afterwards, on
October 7, 1786.
It is very difficult to form a just estimate of
this composer, whose merits were great, yet
whose importance to the history of Art seems now
so small. The dramatic music of the end of the
last century is summed up to us in the operas
of Gluck and Mozart, exclusive of many others,
akin to these in style and tendency, deficient
only, in the vital element which makes one work
live while others die out. At the time of their
production the line may have seemed more
difficult to draw. One drop of essence may
be distilled from a large quantity of material,
yet without the proportion of material, that
drop would not be obtained. Among the second-
rate writers of this transition period, Sacchini
must rank first. A little more force, perhaps a
little less facility, and he might have been a
great, instead of a clever, or a ' graceful, elegant
and judicious ' composer. He, better than most
Italians, seems to have understood the dawning
idea of the ( poetical basis of music ' ; unfor
tunately the musical ideas, of which the super
structure must (after all) consist, while good and
appropriate as far as they went, were limited.
His dramatic sense was keen and just, but was
not backed by sufficient creative power to make
a lasting mark. Fear, remorse, love, hatred,
revenge, — these things repeat themselves in the
world's drama from Time's beginning to its end,
but their expressions are infinite in variety.
They repeat themselves, too, in Sacchini's operas,
but always in very much the same way. In his
later works, the influence of Gluck's spirit is
unmistakeable. There is a wide gulf between
such early Italian operas as ' L'Isola d'Amore,
consisting of the usual detached series of songs,
duets, and concerted pieces, and the ' (Edipe &
Colone/ where each number leads into the next,
and where vigorous accompanied recitative and
well-contrasted, dialogued choruses carry on and
illustrate the action of the drama, while keeping
alive the interest of the hearer. Burney remarks
that Sacchini, ' observing how fond the English
were of Handel's oratorio choruses, introduced
SACCHINL
solemn and elaborate choruses into gome of his
operas ; but, though excellent in their kind, they
never had a good effect ; the mixture of English
singers with the Italian, as well as the awkward
figure they cut as actors, joined to the difficulty
of getting their parts by heart, rendered those
compositions ridiculous which in still life would
have been admirable.' In Paris they managed
these things better, for in all the operas of Sac-
chiui's which were composed or arranged for the
French stage, choruses are used largely and with
admirable effect, while in ' (Edipe ' they are the
principal feature. A somewhat similar transition
to this is apparent in comparing Piccinnr's earlier
and later works ; but his French operas are only
Italian ones modified and enlarged. Sacchini
had far more dramatic spirit, and took more
kindly to the change. He bears the kind of
relation to Gluck that Piccinni does to Mozart,
but he approached his model more nearly, for
he handled Cluck's theory almost as well as
Gluck himself: had he possessed the one thing
lacking — force of originality, there might have
been more in his works for ' criticism to censure/
but they might not now have been forgotten.
As it was, they made a hard struggle for life.
The ' QEdipe ' was continuously on the boards of
the Acade'mie for 43 years (from 1787 to 1830),
which can be said of no other opera. During
this time it had 583 representations. It was
revived in July 1843, and was performed six
times in that year and once in May, 1844.
Sacchini understood orchestral as well as choral
effect. His scores are small, oboes, horns, and
sometimes trumpets and bassoons, being the only
additions to the string quartet, but the treat
ment is as effective as it is simple. His part-
writing is pure and good, while the .care and
finish evident in his scores is hard to reconcile
with the accounts of his idle and irregular ways.
The same technical qualities are shown in his
compositions for the church, which in other ways
are less distinguished than his operas from con
temporary works of a similar kind.
Much of Sacchini's music is lost. Fe'tis gives
a list of 21 sacred contpositions, and the names
of 41 operas, the chief of which have been men
tioned here, but Burney puts the number of
these much higher. The last of them, 'Arvire
et Evelina,' was left unfinished. It was com
pleted by J. B. Key, and performed with success
after the composer's death (April 29, 1788). He
also left six trios for two violins and bass ; six
quartets for two violins, tenor and bass; and two
sets, each of six harpsichord sonatas, with violin,
as well as twelve sonatas (ops. 3 and 4) for clavier
solo. These were all published in London. One
of the sonatas, in F, is included in Pauer's 'Alte
Meister.' [See the list, vol. ii. 247 &.] A couple
of cavatinas are given by Gevaert in his ' Gloires
1 1 T
d italic,' and an antiphon for two voices by
Choron in his ' Journal de Chant.' [F.A.M.]
^ SACKBUT (Fr. Saguebute, Samlmque ; Span.
Sacabuche ; Ital. Trombone; Ger. Posaune). An
old name for the Trombone or Bass-trumpet,
VOL. in. PT. 2.
SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY. 209
There is good evidence that, besides the Tuba
and Lituus, the Romans had instruments of the
trumpet family, provided with a slide for altering
their pitch. Indeed a fine specimen, discovered
in the ruins of Herculaneum, and presented to
George III. is now in possession of Her Majesty
the Queen. Some such instrument was known to
Shakespeare, who has the passage :
The trumpets, sackbuts, psalteries, and fifea
Make the sun dance.— Coriolanus.
It is also named by Burton in his ' Anatomy of
Melancholy': 'As he that plaies upon a Sagbut
by pulling it up and down alters his tones and
tunes.' The word translated Sackbut in the
English Bible is sabeca, which was probably a
stringed instrument, and which some identify
with the aanfivKri of the Greeks.
It is a singular fact that the sackbut or trom
bone, though known in Germany, a century ago
had in this country fallen into disuse. This is
clearly proved by the following extract from Dr.
Burney's 'Account of the musical performances
in Westminster Abbey and the Pantheon on May
26, 27, 29, and June 3 and 5, 1784' :
In order to render the band as powerful and complete
as possible it was determined to employ every species of
instrument that was capable of producing grand effects
in a great orchestra and spacious building. Among
these the SACEUT or DOUBLE TRUMPET was sought;
but so many years had elapsed since it had been used
in this kingdom, that neither the instrument nor a
performer upon it could easily be found. It was how
ever discovered . . that in his Majesty's private military
band there were six musicians who played the three
several species of sacbut, tenor, bass, and double bass.1
On referring to the band -list the following entry
is found :
TROMBONI OR SACBUTS.
Mr. Karst.
Kneller.
Mr. Moeller.
Neibour.
Mr. Pick.
Zink.
These performers played on other instruments when the
Sacbuts were not wanted.
For musical details, see TEOMBONE. [W.H.S.]
SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY. This
Society was originated by Thomas Brewer,
Joseph Hart, W. Jeffreys, Joseph Surman, and
— Cockerell, who first met, with a view to its
establishment, on Aug. 21, 1832. Its practical
operations did not however commence until
Nov. 20 following. Its first meetings were held
in the chapel in Gate Street, Lincoln's Inn
Fields, many years since converted into a music
hall. Its first concert was given in the chapel
on Tuesday evening, Jan. 15, 1833. The pro
gramme comprised selections from Handel's
'Messiah' and 'Funeral Anthem," and from
Perry's 'Fall of Jerusalem' and 'Death of
Abel,' with Attwood's Coronation Anthem, ' O
Lord, grant the king a long life,' and the hymn
1 ' The most common Sacbut, -which the Italians call Tromlone, and
the Germans Posaune, is an octave below the common trumpet ; its
length eight feet when folded, and sixteen straight. There is a
manual by which a note can be acquired a fourth lower than the
usual lowest sound on the trumpet, and all the tones and semitone >
ol the common scale.' (Footnote in the original.)
210 SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY.
'Adeste fideles.' The names of the principal
singers were not published; Thomas Harper
was engaged as solo trumpeter. The then officers
of the Society were John Newman Harrison,
president; Thomas Brewer, secretary; J. G.
Moginie, treasurer ; Joseph Surman, conductor ;
George Perry, leader of the band ; and F. C.
Walker, organist. In Nov. 1833, the permission
to meet in the chapel being suddenly withdrawn,
the Society removed to a chapel in Henrietta
Street, Brunswick Square, and shortly afterwards
to a room belonging to the Scottish Hospital in
Fleur de Lys Court, Fleet Street ; but at Mid
summer, 1834, it migrated to Exeter Hall, which
was its home until Michaelmas, 1880. The con
certs were for the first two years given in the
Minor Hall, and consisted principally of selec
tions, in which a few short complete works were
occasionally introduced, such as Handel's ' Det-
tingen Te Deum,' Haydn's ' Mass,' No. i, Bishop's
'Seventh Day,' and Romberg's ' The Transient
and the Eternal.' The Society having on June 28,
1836, given a concert in the Large Hall in aid of
a charity with very great success, was shortly
afterwards induced to give its own concerts
there. At the same time an important change
in its policy was effected, viz. the abandonment
of miscellaneous selections for complete oratorios,
a change which was received by the public with
great favour. Up to that period, even at the
provincial festivals, it was very rarely that any
complete oratorio, except Handel's ' Messiah '
was performed, whilst the programmes of the
so-called ' Oratorios ' at the two patent theatres
on the Wednesdays and Fridays in Lent were a
mongrel mixture of oratorio songs and choruses,
secular songs of all kinds, and instrumental solos.
The first concert given in the Large Hall on the
Society's own account was Handel's ' Messiah,'
on Dec. 20, 1836, the orchestra consisting of
about 300 performers. In 1837 the works
performed included Mendelssohn's ' St. Paul '
(March 7)* f°r the first time in London and
second in England, Handel's 'Messiah,' 'Israel
in Egypt,' and 'Dettingen Te Deum,' Haydn's
'Creation/ and the Mass known as Mozart's
1 2th. On Sept. 1 2 another performance of ' St.
Paul' was given, in the composer's presence
[see MENDELSSOHN], of which he wrote to the
Committee of the Society — ' I can hardly express
the gratification I felt in hearing my work per
formed in so beautiful a manner, — indeed, I
shall never wish to hear some parts of it better
executed than they were on that night. The
power of the choruses, — that large body of good
and musical voices, — and the style in which they
sang the whole of my music, gave me the highest
and most heartfelt treat ; while I reflected on the
immense improvement which such a number of
real amateurs must necessarily produce in the
country which may boast of it.' During the
year the number of performers was increased to
500. In the same year the formation of a
musical library was commenced, and Robert
Kanzow Bowley appointed honorary librarian.
In 1838 Handel's 'Judas Maccabeus,' 'Samson,'
SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY.
and 'Solomon' were revived, and Beethoven's
'Mass in C,' Spohr's 'Last Judgment,' and
Perry's 'Fall of Jerusalem' introduced. 1839
witnessed the revival and repetition of Handel's
' Joshua.' A new organ was built for the Society
by Walker, and opened Jan. 23, 1840, with a
performance by Thomas Adams. Handel's 'Saul'
was revived, and Elvey's 'Resurrection and
Ascension,' and Perry's ' Thanksgiving Anthem
on the birth of the Princess Royal ' introduced.
1841 was distinguished by a revival of Handel's
'Jephthah,' and by two performances of a
selection of anthems. The latter was received
with great interest, public attention having been
then lately drawn to our cathedral music. The
programme was chronologically arranged and
exhibited the various changes in the style of
English church music from Tallis to Samuel
Wesley, a period of two centuries and a half.
It is true that a performance of a so-called
'Selection of Anthems' had been given in the
preceding year, but the programme being in
judiciously arranged — a few anthems being inter
spersed with songs and other pieces in no wise
connected with church-music, — had produced
but little effect : the distinguishing feature of it
was two admirable performances upon the organ
by Mendelssohn. Perry's ' Death of Abel,' waa
also brought forward in 1841. In 1842 Handel's
' Jubilate Deo,' and Beethoven's ' Mount of
Olives' (the 'Engedi' version), were introduced.
In 1843 Spohr's 'Fall of Babylon' was produced,
conducted by the composer, who was then
on a visit to England ; Dr. Crotch's anthem,
' The Lord is king,' was performed for the first
time ; Mendelssohn's ' Hymn of Praise ' was
introduced, and also Handel's 'Deborah.' The
new introductions in 1844 were a Coronation
Anthem and an organ concerto by Handel, Men
delssohn's 42nd Psalm, and Haydn's Mass, No.
1 6 ; but the season was chiefly distinguished by
two performances of Mendelssohn's 'St. Paul,'
conducted by the composer. Handel's 'Atha-
liah,' Purcell's 'Jubilate in D,' and cantata
'Saul and the Witch of Endor,' Neukomm's
' David,' and a new selection of anthems, were
brought forward for the first time in 1845. In
1846 the new introductions comprised Perry's
'Belshazzar's Feast,' Mendelssohn's I I4th Psalm,
Haydn's Mass, No. 2, and some minor pieces.
1847 was an important epoch in the Society's
annals ; Handel's ' Belshazzar ' was revived, and
a new selection of anthems given, but the greatest
event was the production for the first time in its
improved form of Mendelssohn's ' Elijah,' under
his own personal direction. Four performances
of it were given, and it at once took that firm
position which it has ever since maintained.
Subsequently Spohr visited this country at the
invitation of the Society and conducted two per
formances of his 'Fall of Babylon' and one of
his 'Christian's Prayer' and 'Last Judgment'
(the last for the only time in England), and pro
duced his ' 84th Psalm, Milton's version,' com
posed expressly for the occasion. An occurrence
also took place during this year which eventually
SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY.
led to changes which had an important influence
on the fortunes of the Society. A committee,
appointed to investigate the conduct of Joseph
Surman, both in respect of his dealings with the
Society and his execution of the office of con
ductor, having unanimously reported adversely
to him, he was removed from his office Feb. 15,
1848. [SuRMAN.] Pending a regular appointment
the remaining concerts of the season were con
ducted by the leader of the band, George Perry.
Mr. (now Sir Michael) Costa was elected con
ductor, Sept. 22, 1848. Very beneficial results
followed this appointment : both band and chorus
were strengthened and improved, and the number
of performers was augmented to nearly 700. The
performances of the season consisted principally
of more effective renderings of the stock pieces,
but Mendelssohn's music for ' Athalie' was intro
duced with great success. In 1850 nothing new
was given but Mendelssohn's 'Lauda Sion' in
an English dress. 1851 was chiefly remarkable
for the number of concerts given — 31 ; ' Messiah,'
'Elijah,' and the 'Creation' having been per
formed alternately, one in each week, from May
to September for the gratification of visitors to
the Great Exhibition in Hyde Park. Later in
the year Haydn's 'Seasons' was introduced for
the first time. In 1852 Spohr's 'Calvary 'and
the fragments of Mendelssohn's ' Christus ' were
introduced. In 1853 some changes took place
in the officers of the Society, R. K. Bowley be
coming treasurer, and W. H. Husk succeeding
him as librarian : Mozart's ' Requiem ' was first
brought forward this year. 1854 was distin-
tinguished by two performances of Beethoven's
Mass in D. Griesbach's ' Daniel ' was also
brought forward, and the Society undertook the
performance of the music at the opening of the
Crystal Palace on May 10. In 1856 Costa's
' Eli ' was performed for the first time in London
with marked success. In 1857 Rossini's ' Stabat
Mater' was introduced, and the Society under
took the musical arrangements for the first
Handel Festival at the Crystal Palace. [See
HANDEL FESTIVAL.] In 1862 Beethoven's
* Mount of Olives' was given with its proper
libretto. Costa's 'Naaman' was introduced to
a London audience in 1865. In 1867 Benedict's
'Legend of St. Cecilia' was given for the first
time in London. In 1870 Beethoven's Mass in
D was again performed. The Society sustained
the loss, by death, of three of its principal officers,
J. N. Harrison, president, R. K, Bowley, treasurer,
and T. Brewer, secretary and, for a few weeks,
president. They were replaced by D. Hill,
president, W. H. Withall, treasurer, and J. F.
Puttick, secretary. In 1873 the last-named
died, and E. H. Mannering was appointed in
his stead. Bach's St. Matthew 'Passion' was
given for the first time. In 1874 Dr. Crotch's
* Palestine ' was introduced, and Macfarren's
' St. John the Baptist ' given for the first time
in London. Mozart's Litany in Bb, in an English
dress, was introduced in 1877. In 1878 Rossini's
'Moses in Egypt' was restored to its original
position as an oratorio. Nothing new was
SAGGIO DI CONTRAPPUNTO. 211
brought forward in the season of 1879-80, which
ended on April 30, 1880, with 'Israel in Egypt.'
Owing to a change in the proprietorship of Exeter
Hall the Society had to quit that building, and
the concerts of the season 1 880-81 were given in
St. James's Hall, the number of performers being
reduced, on account of the limited space of the
orchestra, to about 300. The first concert was
on Dec. 3. Sullivan's ' Martyr of Antioch ' (first
time in London) and Cherubini's Requiem in C
minor were brought out during the season.
The Society's library, in the 44 years which
have elapsed since its formation, has become the
largest collection of music and musical literature
ever gathered together by a musical body in
England. Space does not allow here of even a
brief list of its principal contents, and the reader
is therefore referred to the last edition of its
printed catalogue, issued in 1872. [See also
MUSICAL LIBRARIES, vol. ii. p. 420(1.] The
Society also possesses some interesting original
portraits, statuary, and autograph letters. It
is in constitution an essentially amateur body,
none but amateurs being eligible for member
ship, and the governing committee being chosen
by and from the members. Every member is
required to take some part in the orchestra,
and a strict examination as to his qualification
for so doing is made prior to his admission. The
most eminent professors are engaged as principal
vocalists and instrumentalists, the rest of the
band and the whole of the chorus being amateurs.
The members are comparatively few in number,
the majority of the amateurs being assistants,
who give their gratuitous services, but pay no
subscription. The subscription of members, ori
ginally £i, is now £2 2s. od. per annum. Sub
scribers to the concerts pay £3 35. od., £2 I2s.6c?.,
or £2 2s. od. per annum, according to the posi
tion of their seats. [W.H.H.]
SACRED HARMONIC SOCIETY, THE
BENEVOLENT FUND OF THE, was instituted March
14, 1855, for the aid of necessitous persons who
had at any time been connected with the Sacred
Harmonic Society. It differs from a benefit
society in the fact that relief is not restricted to sub
scribers to the Fund, and that none are entitled
to the receipt of stated sums upon the happening
of stated events. Each applicant's case is con
sidered on its merits, and either a temporary
grant or a small continuous pension awarded as
circumstances may require. The management
of the Fund is entrusted to an independent
committee, chosen by the Governors of the Fund
from the members of the Sacred Harmonic
Society. An annual subscription of IDS. 6d.
constitutes a Governor, and a donation of £5 55. at
one time a Life Governor. The claims upon the
Fund have been so numerous and urgent that it
has been impossible to increase its capital to the
desired extent. [W.H.H.]
SAGGIO DI CONTRAPPUNTO (Pattern
of Counterpoint). A very important work, pub
lished, at Bologna, in 1774-5, by the Padre
Giambattista Martini, in two large 4to volumes,
dedicated to Cardinal Vincenzo Malvezzi, and
P2
212 SAGGIO DI CONTRAPPUNTO.
SAINT ANNE'S TUNE.
now becoming very scarce. The full title, ' E-
semplare, o sia saggio fondamentale pratico di
contrappunto sopra il canto fermo,' etc., suffi
ciently explains the design of the work, in which
the author endeavours to teach the Art of
Counterpoint, rather by reference to the most
perfect obtainable models, than by any code of
written laws. The method adopted for this pur
pose is above all praise. The bulk of the volume
consists of a series of examples, in the form of
Motets, Madrigals, Movements from Masses, and
other similar Compositions, selected from the
works of the greatest Masters of the i6th and
I yth centuries, beautifully printed, from move-
able types, in lozenge-headed notes, resembling
those found in Italian Part-Books of the best
period, but, without the Ligatures which render
those books so puzzling to the modern Musician.
The Masters selected are, Agostini, Animuccia,
Barbieri, Baroni, Benevoli, Bernabei, Caresana,
Cifra, Clari, Corvo, Falconio, Foggia, Gabussi,
Gesualdo, Lotti, Marcello, Marenzio, Minarti,
Monteverde, Morales, Navarro di Siviglia, Ni-
trami, Olstani, Ortiz, Pacchioni, Palestrina, P.
Pontio Parmigiano, Pasquale, Perti, Piocchi,
Porta, Predieri, Eiccieri, Rota, A. Scarlatti,
Stradella, Turini, Vittoria, Willaert, Zarlino, and
several Anonymi. The works are arranged in
accordance with the characteristics of their re
spective Schools ; and each Movement is illus
trated by a copious series of annotations, explain
ing its general design, pointing out the various
devices employed in its construction, and calling
particular attention to its merits, and the lessons
to be learned from it. The amount of sound
scholarship, and able criticism, displayed in these
annotations, renders the work extremely valuable
for purposes of study ; while the rarity of the
original edition suggests the desirableness of a
careful reprint. [W. S. R.]
SAINT ANNE'S TUNE. This well-known
tune, in accordance with a practice of which
there are several examples,1 was constructed by
the addition of a new continuation to a fragment
of an older melody. A seven-part motet of
Palestrina 's, published in May 1569, leads off
in the first treble with this phrase
A- » /* - (-^ r^ P^ 1 ~
jfTTS * l.j £3 ' -£? ^3 \ tSC
?H
S3? <^ ' t?
1 1 1
t'*m I* — - . o - P* 1 -T . tS
7~i
^ tf ^7 <-" p' 1 <!y 1 f^
O -rj
* \ ' ^J 1
J
i 1 II ••-> "f^' ^->
II
,.A 2ZZZE.IZ — ^ F^ «-->
(^ • • II
<;::?. 4*^-1 Ci> p7 p^
u
Jp? n ' - -L 1 .--
n
n — ^ ?"^— i f9 — '"2 — TZ~
— \—K \ fg— f^ \ ^ r—\ — P-
-^-H
• — j i • - i ' i
II
<--' i f^> \ ' i
n
^
« A p^ I eZ* ll-''1 1
^^ 4 \
1 I
Tu es Pet - rus
identical with the first phrase of St. Anne's;
«,fter which the resemblance ceases. The entire
first strain of the tune is said to be traceable to
a French chanson of the i6th century. It was
adopted by J. S. Bach as the subject of an organ
fugue, known in England as ' St. Anne's fugue ' —
a misleading title, as, except in the identity of
its subject with the first strain of St. Anne's,
the fugue has no connection with the hymn-tune.
As early as 1638 the same strain was employed
by Henry Lawes as the commencement of the
tunes set by him to the gth and I36th Psalms in
Sandys's ' Paraphrase upon the Psalmes of David. '
i The 'Old Hundredth' psalm tune is another instance. Its first
strain is the commencement of several distinct tunes.
St. Anne's tune, under that name, is first
found in ' A Supplement to the New Version of
the Psalms,' sixth edition, much enlarged, 1708.
Dr. Croft's name is not mentioned in the work,
but he is believed to have been the musical
editor of this edition of the Supplement: the
name of the tune is probably derived from that
of the parish, St. Anne's, Westminster, of which
he was then organist, and the tune itself is
directly ascribed to him by his contemporaries,
viz. Philip Hart in ' Melodies proper to be sung
to any of ye Versions of ye Psalms of David,' cir.
1716, and John Church in his 'Introduction to
Psalmody,' 1723. The tune appears in the ' Sup
plement ' in the following form : —
Psalm xlii. St. Anne's Tune.
That this arrangement is by Croft cannot be
doubted.
Of late years some doubt has been thrown on
the authorship of the tune from its having been
found in Abraham Barber's ' Book of Psalm
Tunes,' a Yorkshire collection, of which the
license bears date Feb. 14, 1687, when Croft was
but ten years of age. Here the tune appears
under the name of ' Leeds ' and is ascribed to
'Mr. Denby,' whose name some editors of
hymnals have too hastily substituted for that of
Croft. The edition, however, of Barber's Psalms
which contains the tune is the seventh, dated
1715, or seven years after the publication of the
' Supplement ' already mentioned. This edition
contains, besides tunes for Canticles, Psalms,
etc., 28 hymn-tunes arranged in four parts, with
the melody in the tenor. Of these tunes three
only have a composer's name prefixed, and these
three, which bear the names of northern towns
('Leverpool,' ' Hallifax,' and 'Leeds'), are all
ascribed to 'Mr. Denby.' It may be observed
that while the melody of 'Leeds' is identical
with that of St. Anne's in the 'Supplement,'
the modulation at the end of the 3rd strain is
different.
Leerls Tune. MR.
SAINT ANNE'S TUNE.
SAINT-GEORGES.
213
The supposition, however, that * Leeds ' was
originally in Barber's Psalm-book has been
disproved by the recent discovery of a copy of
an early edition of the collection, which from the
evidence of the preface appears to be either the
third or fourth, and to have been published about
I6Q6.1 The title-page is unfortunately missing.
This volume, a smaller book than the edition of
1715, contains but twelve hymn- tunes arranged
in two parts, and neither the tune in question
nor Denby1 s name occurs in it. Until therefore
an edition of Barber's Psalms is found, contain
ing ' Leeds,' and of earlier date than 1 708, Denby
must be regarded as merely the author of a re
arrangement of Croft's tune.
o
That some confusion existed respecting the
authorship may perhaps be inferred from the
fact that Dr. Miller, a Yorkshire organist, in his
' Psalms of David/ 1 790, gives ' St. Ann's, Dr.
Croft ' on one page, and opposite to it ' Leeds,
Denby,' in triple time and as a different tune.
On the other hand it may be noticed that in
another Yorkshire collection, John and James
Green's ' Collection of choice Psalm Tunes '
(Sheffield, 3rd ed. 1715), St. Anne's tune is quoted
under that name. Dr. Sullivan has employed
St. Anne's with excellent effect in his Te Deum
performed at St. Paul's in the Thanksgiving
Service, Feb. 27, 1872, on occasion of the re
covery of the Prince of Wales ; and in another
piece ('The Son of God') has harmonised the
tune with varying effects in successive verses in
an admirable manner. [G.A.C.]
SAINT- AUBIN, JEANNE CHARLOTTE SCHRCE-
DER, a very remarkable opera-singer, born in
Paris, Dec. 9, 1 764. She was daughter of a thea
trical manager, began to act as a mere child, and
when only 9, charmed Louis XV. by her preco
cious talent. In 1782 she married Saint-Aubin,
an actor in Mdlle. Montansier's company, and
in 1786 made her first appearance at the Aca-
de'mie, in ' Colinette a la Cour,' but perceiving
that she was not qualified for so large a stage,
had the good sense to cancel her engagement
with the Opera, and transfer herself to the Co-
me"die Italienne. There her pleasing and ex
pressive face, refined and graceful acting, and
singing, always intelligent and in tune, could be
properly appreciated, and she speedily became a
favourite both with the public and the dramatists.
No actress ever created a greater number of
roles; sentimental, pathetic, ingenues, soubrettes,
grandes coquettes, or burlesque characters — all
came alike to her. Her singing was not so re
markable as her acting, but she sang romances
i The preface speaks of 'former editions,' and adds— 'since the
Psalmes in metre are this last year much refin'd as to the English
by some good grave Divine Persons who hath only left out all the old
words and made the meter good English.' The preface to the seventh
edition is a different one.
with great charm of expression, and by taste and
skill supplied the lack of power in her voice,
became the acknowledged star of the company
and its most profitable member. She was, how
ever, badly treated by the management, for though
admitted as sodetaire to the fourth of a share in
1788, she was not advanced to a full share till
1798, after her success in 'Le Prisonnier.'
In 1 800 she lost all her savings by the bank
ruptcy of the Theatre Favart, but on the union
of the two comedy-companies she retained her
position as sodetaire, and was appointed one of
the five members of the management, a post which
she resigned on Mnie. Dugazon's retirement, not
wishing to be the only woman on the board. At
her farewell benefit (April 2, 1808) she took the
part ofMme. Belmontin 'Le Prisonnier,' leaving
Rosine, her own creation, to her second daughter,
Alexandrine. Her elder daughter also appeared
in the ' Concert interrompu. ' Her modest pension
of 1900 francs was increased by Louis XVIII. to
3000. She took her final farewell, assisted by
her eldest daughter, Mme. Duret, on Nov. 7,
1818, in 'Uneheure de mariage,' and was as much
applauded as ever. Mme. Saint-Aubin lived to
a great age, and died in Paris, Sept. n, 1850.
Three of her children distinguished themselves ;
the son, JEAN DENIS, born at Lyons in 1783, a
violinist and composer of great promise, died at
Paris in 1810.
The elder daughter, CECILE, born at Lyons in
1785, a pupil of Garat, made her de"but in 1805
at the Ope"ra Comique in 'Le Concert interrompu,'
but went back to the Conservatoire to study, and
did not reappear till 1808. In the interval she
gained both style and taste in singing, but re
mained an indiiferent actress. Under the name
of Mme. Duret she rose for a short time to dis
tinction as the favourite singer of Nicolo Isouard,
who composed several important and difficult
parts for her. Her best creations were in ' Le
Billet de Loterie,' and 'Jeannot et Colin.' Her
voice was of considerable compass, even and son
orous, though rather heavy ; she vocalized with
skill, and articulated distinctly, but her breath
was short and drawn with effort. She retired in
1820. Her sister ALEXANDRINE, born at Paris
1793, made a brilliant debut at the Theatre Fey-
deau in 1809, and in the following year excited
great enthusiasm in Isouard's ' Cendrillon.' This
was however the only original part in which she
distinguished herself, and on her marriage with an
actor at the Vaudeville in 1812, she retired from
the stage. [G. C.]
SAINT-GEOEGES, JULES HENRI VERNOY,
MARQUIS DE, — not to be confounded with the
notorious Chevalier de Saint-Georges (1745-1799
or 1801) — born in Paris 1801, died there 1875,
writer of novels, and author of numerous librettos
for operas and operas-comiques, was the favourite
collaborateur of Halevy. Among his 120 libret
tos we need only specify those for Donizetti's
' Fille du Regiment ' J Adolphe Adam's ' La
Marquise,' 'Cagliostro,''Le Bijou perdu,' operas;
and ' Giselle,' ' La jolie Fille de Gand,' and 'Ee
Corsaire,' ballets ; Auber's ' L'Ambassadrice,'
214
SAINT-GEORGES.
« Zanetta,* and * Les Diamants de la Couronne/
with Scribe ; Grisar's ' Lady Melvil,' ' Le Caril-
lonneur de Bruges,' and 'Les Amours du Diable' ;
Clapisson's ' La Fanchonnette ' ; and HaleVy's
'L'Eclair,' 'Les Mousquetairea de la Reine,' 'Le
Val d'Andorre,' 'La Fe"e aux Roses,' 'Le Juif
errant,' 'Le Nabab/ and < Jaguarita 1'Indienne.'
From this list it will appear that Saint-Georges
was the most prolific, as he was the ablest, of
all French contemporary librettists after Scribe.
No one has yet appeared competent to supply the
place of either of these clever writers. [G.C.]
SAINT 1HUBERTY, ANTOINETTE C^CILE,
an eminent French operatic actress, whose real
surname was Clavel, was born at Toul, about
1756. Her father, who had previously served in
the army, became stage manager to a French
opera company at Mannheim, and afterwards
at Warsaw, where she studied for four years
with Lemoyne, conductor of the orchestra. Her
first public appearance was in an opera of his ' Le
Bouquet de Colette.' She then went to Berlin,
and is said to have been married there to a
certain Chevalier de Croisy, of whom, however,
nothing is heard in her subsequent history. For
three years she sang at Strassburg, as Mile.
Clavel, and thence went to Paris, and made her
ddbut at the Acaddmie as 'un demon, un plaisir'
in the first performance of Gluck's 'Armide'
(Sept. 23, 1777). For a considerable tune she only
played in subordinate parts. Her appearance
was not striking ; she was fair, thin, and below
middle height, with a face expressive, but not
beautiful. Her voice was produced badly and
with effort, her stage action was spasmodic and
exaggerated, and she had a strong German accent.
But Gluck found in this ill- trained actress some
qualities he may have vainly sought for in more
finished singers. She appeared one morning at
rehearsal in an old black gown in the last stage
of patched decrepitude. ' Here comes Madame
la Ressource,' remarked some gay rival (alluding
to the character of that name in 'Le Joueur').
' Well said,' answered Gluck ; ' that woman will
some day be the resource of the opera.' Perhaps
she heard the words — we may be sure she heard
of them. She laboured to improve herself, and
on the retirement of two leading singers suc
ceeded to their parts. Her first great success
was as Angelique in Piccinni's ' Roland,' and
was followed by others in Floquet's ' Le Seigneur
Bienfaisant,' Gossec's 'Thesee' (March I, 1782),
and Edelmann's 'Ariane* (Sept. 24, 1782), all
tragic roles ; while as Rosette in Gre'try's ' L'Em-
barras des Richesses' (Nov. 26, 1782), she showed
all the versatility and vivacity necessary for
comedy. As Armide (in Sacchini's ' Renaud '),
in ' Didon,' ' Chimene,' ' Les Dana'ides,' 'Al-
ceste,' and 'Phedre,' she had a succession of
triumphs. ' Didon,' Piccinni's masterpiece, made
no impression till she undertook the title rdle,
and the composer declared that, without her,
his opera was 'without Dido.' On her first
appearance in that part (Jan. 16, 1784) she
i How she obtained this name is not known.
ST. JAMES'S HALL CONCERT ROOMS.
was crowned upon the stage. She was never a
perfect vocalist ; ' less violent and extravagant
in her singing than the generality of French
singers, but still with too much of the national
style,' says Lord Mount-Edgecumbe, who admits
however that she was an excellent musician.
But her power lay in her extreme sensibility.
In truth and force of expression she was un
equalled ; her declamation was impassioned, her
by- play ' terrible,' her silence ' eloquent.'
In 1785 she made a journey to Marseilles,
which resembled a royal progress. The excite
ment she created amounted to frenzy, and when
she left Provence she carried away more than a
hundred crowns, many of them of great value.
But on her return to Paris she found new
rivals to dispute her sway. She failed, too, as
Clytemnestra, a part altogether unsuited to her.
It ended four years later by her marrying the
Comte d'Entraigues, of strong royalist sympathies,
in which she participated warmly. In 1790 he
had emigrated to Lausanne, and there their
marriage took place, at the end of that year. It
was only acknowledged, however, in 1797, after
the Count, imprisoned at Milan by Bonaparte,
had been released by his wife, who found means
of enabling him to escape, and of preserving his
portfolio, full of political papers. For this ser
vice she was rewarded by Louis XVIII. with the
Order of St. Michel and, it seems, by her hus
band with the recognition of their marriage.
The Count afterwards entered the Russian
diplomatic service, and was employed on secret
missions. The peace of Tilsit changed his tactics.
He possessed himself in some manner of a copy
of the secret articles of the Treaty, and hastened
with them to England to communicate them to
the government. For this he is said to have re
ceived a pension. He established himself, with his
wife, at Barnes, near Richmond, where, July 22,
1812, they were assassinated by their servant,
who stabbed them as they were getting into
their carriage, and blew out his own brains
afterwards. This man had been bribed by emis
saries of Fouche"s, sent to watch the proceedings
of the Count d'Entraigues, and had allowed them
to take copies of correspondence with the Foreign
Office, entrusted to his care by his master. He
had reason to think that his treachery was being
discovered, and fear of the consequences probably
prompted him to the dreadful deed. [F.A.M.]
SAINT JAMES'S HALL CONCERT
ROOMS were erected, at the cost of a company
with limited liability, from designs by Owen
Jones. Messrs. Lucas were the builders.
The project was taken up by two of the
music-publishing firms, Messrs. Beale & Chappell
of Regent Street, and Chappell & Co. of New
Bond Street ; and the company was formed
mainly by them, and among their friends.
Messrs. T. F. Beale and W. Chappell became
the tenants of the Crown for the land, holding
it in trust for the Company. The capital was
fixed at £40,000, because the original estimate
for the new building was £23,000, and the re
mainder was supposed to be an ample sum for
ST. JAMES'S HALL CONCERT ROOMS.
compensations, working expenses, etc. It was
then unknown that between Regent Street and
Piccadilly was the ancient boundary of Thorney
Island with its quicksand, but this was en
countered in the course of the building, and had
to be saturated with concrete at great cost, in
order to make a sure foundation. Other demands
raised the cost of the building to beyond £70,000.
The Great Hall was opened to the public on
March 25, 1858, with a concert for the benefit
of Middlesex Hospital, given in presence of the
Prince Consort.
The principal entrance to the Great Hall is
from Regent Street, and that to the Minor Hall
from Piccadilly — the former street being higher
than the latter. The dimensions of the Great
Hall are 139 feet in length, 60 in height, and
60 in breadth. It will seat on the Ground
Floor noo ; in the Balcony 517 ; in the Gallery
210; in the Orchestra 300; total 2127. The
above is as the numbered benches and seats
are usually arranged, but, by placing the seats
closer together, many more persons can be seated.
Under the further part of the Great Hall is
the Minor Hall, 60 feet by 57, having also a
Gallery, an Orchestra, and a small room. Under
the Regent Street end of the Great Hall is one
of the dining rooms, 60 feet by 60, and on the
Regent Street level is another dining room 40 feet
by 40, with a large banquetting • room on the
floor above, etc.
In 1860 alterations and additions were made
to the Restaurant attached to the Concert Rooms,
at a further outlay of £5000. The Company
was eventually enabled to pay these charges,
through the uncovenanted liberality of some of
the directors, in accepting personal responsibility
to mortgagees and bankers, while they dimi
nished the debt annually through the receipts
of the Hall. Many concerts were given for the
express purpose of engaging the Hall on off-
nights, especially the Monday Popular Concerts,
which have now become an institution, but were
originally started by Chappell & Co. to bring
together a new public to fill the Hall on Monday
nights. In 1874 three more houses in Piccadilly
were purchased to add to the Restaurant. The
rebuilding of these entailed a further expenditure
of £45,000, so that the total cost has exceeded
£ 1 20,000. Mr. George Leslie has been Secretary
to the Company from its first institution, and so
continues. [W.C.]
SAINT-SAENS, CHARLES CAMILLE, born Oct.
9t T835, in the Rue du Jardinet (now No. 3)
Paris. Having lost his father, he was brought
up by his mother and a great-aunt, whom
he called 'bonne maman.' She taught him
the elements of music, and to this day the com
poser keeps the little old- fashioned instrument
on which this dearly-loved relative gave him
his first lessons. At seven he began to study
the piano with Stamaty, and afterwards had
lessons in harmony from Maleden. Gifted with
an excellent ear and a prodigious memory, he
showed from childhood a marvellous aptitude
for music, and an unusual thirst for knowledge.
SAINT-SAfiNS.
215
In 1847 he entered Benoist's class at the Conserva
toire (the only one he attended) and obtained the
second organ-prize in 1849, an(^ ^ne ^rs^ m I85i-
He left in the following year, but competed for the
Prix de Rome, which was however won by Ldonce
Cohen, his senior by six years. He was not more
fortunate at a second trial in 1864, although by
that time he had made a name in more than one
branch of composition. These academic failures
are therefore of no real importance, and we
merely mention them because it is remarkable
that the most learned of French contemporary
musicians should have gained every possible dis
tinction except the Grand Prix de Rome.
Saint-Saens was only sixteen when he com
posed his first symphony, which was performed
with success by the Societ£ de Sainte Ce'cile.
In 1853 he became organist of the church of
St. Merri, and shortly after accepted the post of
pianoforte professor at Niedermeyer's Ecole re-
ligieuse. Though overwhelmed with work he
found time for composing symphonies, chamber-
music, and vocal and instrumental pieces — and
for playing at concerts, where he became known
as an interpreter of classical music. In 1858
he became organist of the Madeleine, and dis
tinguished himself as much by his talent for
improvisation as by his execution. He only
resigned this coveted post in 1877, when he was
much gratified by the appointment of Theodore
Dubois, a solid musician, worthy in every respect
to be his successor.
The stage in Paris being the sole road to fame
and fortune, all French musicians naturally aim
at dramatic composition. Saint-Saens was no
exception to this rule. He was in the first rank
of pianists and organists, and his cantata ' Les
Noces de Prome'the'e ' had been awarded the
prize by the International Exhibition of 1867,
and performed with great e"clat, but these suc
cesses could not content him, and he produced
'La Princesse jaune,' i act, at the Opera Com-
ique, June 12, 1872, and 'Le Timbre d'argent,'
a fantastic opera in 4 acts, at the Theatre Lyrique
Feb. 23, 1877. Both operas were comparative
failures ; and, doubtless discouraged by so harsh a
judgment from the Parisian public, he produced
his next work, ' Samson et Dalila,' a sacred drama
(Dec. 1877), at Weimar, and 'Etienne Marcel,'
opera in 4 acts (Feb. 8, 1879), a* Lyons.
Whether as a performer or a conductor, M.
Saint-Saens likes a large audience, and this
desire has led him to become an extensive
traveller. He has been in Russia, Spain, and
Portugal, besides paying repeated visits to Ger
many, Austria, and England, so that he may
be truly said to have acquired a European
reputation. His fame mainly rests on bis instru
mental music, and on his masterly and effective
manner of dealing with the orchestra. He is an
excellent contrapuntist, shines in the construction
of his orchestral pieces, has a quick ear for
picturesqueness of detail, and has written enough
fine music to procure him an honourable position
among French composers. He has very great
power of combination, and of seizing instanta-
216
SAINT-SAENS.
neously all the latent capacities of a given theme,
both in the way of melody and harmony.1
In addition to his other claims to distinction,
Saint-Saens is a first-rate musical critic, and has
contributed articles to ' La Renaissance,' ' L'Es-
tafette,' and 'Le Voltaire,' the best of which he
intends to publish separately. He was elected
member of the Institute, vice Henri Reber, Feb.
19, 1881.
The printed catalogue of his works includes
64 opus numbers, besides many unnumbered
pieces. From it the following list has been
compiled and classified.
Dramatic and lyric:— The 4
operas already mentioned, and
' Les Noces de Promethee ' (Cirque
du Champs E1yse"es, Sept. 1, 1807) ;
1 Le Deluge ' (1876) ; ' La Lyre et la
Harpe," cantata composed for the
Birmingham Festival (Aug. 28,
1879). Another, -written for the
Centenary of General Hoche (Ver
sailles, June 24, 186S), has not been
published.
Orchestral :— 2 Symphonies, in
Eb and A minor; 'Occident et
Orient,' march for military band
and orchestra (performed at the
giving away of the prizes at the
Paris Exhibition of 1878) ; ' Marche
h^ro'ique ' ; ' Suite pour orchestre '
(Prelude, Sarabande, Gavotte.
Romance, and Finale)'; 4 poemes
symphoniques, ' Le Rouet d'Om
phale,' 'Phae'ton,' ' Danse Ma
cabre,' and 'La Jcunesse d'Her-
cule ' ; a very important ' Suite
Alg(5rienne' (Prelude, Rhapsodie
Mauresque, Reverie du Soir, and
Marche militairefrancaise); 'Une
Nuit a Lisbonne,' barcarolle ; 'La
Jota Aragonesa,' transcription.
Also a prize symphony in F (1856)
for the Societe Sainte C(5cile at
Bordeaux, a MS. overture ' Spar-
tacus,' awarded the prize by the
same society, and several minor
pieces.
Sacred music :— ' Messe a 4 voix'
for solos, chorus, orchestra, full
organ, and 'orgue d'accompagne-
ment'; 'Messe de Requiem.' for
solos,!chorus, and orchestra ; ' Ora
torio de Noel ' for ditto ; ' Tantum
ergo ' in B b, for chorus and organ ;
Psalm xix, ' Coeli enarrant.' for
solos, chorus, and orchestra. Also
13 motets, and several pieces for
full organ, including 'Benediction
nuptiale ' (op. 9) and ' Elevation '
(op. 13).
Concerted music with orchestra :
— 4 PF. concertos (in D, G minor,
E b, and C minor) ; 3 violin concer
tos (in A, O.and B minor) ; 'Intro
duction et Rondo ' (op. 28), ' Mor-
ceau tie concert ' (op. 62), and
' Romance ' (op. 48), all for violin ;
Cello-Concerto (A minor) ; ' Ro
mance' for horn or cello (op. 36,
in F) ; 'Romance ' for flute or vio
lin (op. 37 in Db); and 'Taren-
telle ' for flute and clarinette
(op. 6).
Chamber music :— Quintet for
PF., 2 violins, viola, and cello (op.
14) ; S(5ri5nade for PF., organ, vio
lin, and viola, or cello (op. 15) ;
Trio in F for PF. and strings;
Quartet in B b for PF. and ditto
(op. 41) ; Suite for PF. and cello
(op. 16) ; Romance for PF., organ,
and violin (op. 27) ; Sonata in 0
minor for PF. and cello (op. 32) ;
Berceuse in B b for PF. and violin
(op. 38) ; ' Allegro appassionato '
for PF. and cello (op. 43); Ro
mance in D for ditto (op. 51) ;
Septet for PF., 5strings, and trum
pet obligate (the minuet very ori
ginal).
Pianoforte :— Op. 3 ; 11 (Duet-
tino in U, 4 hands) ; 21 (1st Mazur
ka) ; 23 (Gavotte) ; 24 (2nd Mazur
ka) ; 35 (Variations sur un theme
de Beethoven for 2 PFs— a gem) ;
52 (Etudes) ; 56 (Menuet et Valse) ;
and 59 (Ballade, 4 hands) ; besides
several transcriptions of classical
or popular airs, and 12 transcrip
tions from Bach's cantatas and
sonatas.
Vocal :— Scena from ' Horace '
(op. 10) ; ' Melodies Persanes '
26) ; ' Les Soldats de Ge"de"on'
(op.
(op.
46, double chorus for men's voices,
without acct.) ; 'Chanson de
Grand Pere,' chorus for women's
voices ; ' Chanson d'AncStre,"
chorus for men's voices, and bari
tone solo (op. 53, with acct. for
orchestra or PF.) ; more than 40
songs to French, Italian, and Eng
lish words, and several duettinos
and trios.
M. Saint-Saens is a dark, nervous-looking man,
with delicate, almost sharp features, and bright
intelligent eyes. In England he is no stranger.
He first appeared here at the Musical Union, in
1871. In 1874 he played Beethoven's Concerto
in G at the Philharmonic, and again, on July 2,
1879, his own PF. Concerto in G minor, and
i The writer retains a delightful recollection of his improvisations
at the Madeleine, and will never forget a tour de force he himself
witnessed in 1867. At a party where several eminent musicians were
assembled, some one begged Schulhoff to play anything that came
into his head. After a little pressing the fascinating pianist sat
down to the instrument, and began to prelude in the bass, when
.Saint-Saens drew near, and still standing, accompanied in the treble
'the melodies which Schulhoff was playing; then sitting down in his
turn he improvised on the improvisation of his partner in a manner to
captivate the most hypercritical ear. There was indeed occasionally
a slight clashing of keys, but even these double modulations with
contrary resolutions added to the interest.with an audience composed
entirely of practised musicians. It was the most extraordinary ex
hibition of this kind of power which ever came within the writer's
observation.
SAINTON.
Bach's Prelude and Fugue in A minor on the
organ. Later in the same year, Dec. 6, he
played the same work, and conducted his 'Rouet
d'Omphale' at the Crystal Palace. The Con
certo was first introduced there by Miss Helen
Hopekirk, a very rising pianist, Mar. 15, 1879 '•>
the Cello Concerto in A was played by Herr
Hollman, Nov. 27, 1880, and the Overture to
the ' Princesse jaune ' on the 6th of the same
month. At the Popular Concerts three of his
works are known, the Cello Sonata (op. 32) ; a
trio for PF. and strings in F (op. 18), and a
string quartet in Bb (op. 41). [G.C.]
SAINTON, PROSPER PHILIPPE CATHERINE,
an eminent violin-player, born June 5, 1813, at
Toulouse, where his father was a merchant. He
received his education at the College of Toulouse,
and was destined to the law, but his great talent
for music, combined with other reasons, for
tunately altered this, and in 1832 he entered the
Conservatoire at Paris, and studied the violin
under Habeneck, taking the first prize in 1834.
For two years after this he was a member of
the orchestra of the Societe" des Concerts, and
the Grand Ope"ra; and then made an extended
tour through Italy, Germany, Russia, Finland,
Sweden, Denmark, and Spain, with great suc
cess. In 1840 he was appointed Professor of the
violin in the Conservatoire of his native city.
In 1844 he made his first visit to England and
played at the Philharmonic on June 10 and July
8 of that memorable season, under the baton of
Mendelssohn. The following year he returned,
was appointed Professor at the Royal Academy
of Music, and settled in London, where, with
occasional visits to the continent, he has resided
ever since. He took the ist and 2nd violin
alternately with Sivori, Ernst, Molique, and
Vieuxtemps, at the performances of Beethoven's
quartets, at the house of Mr. Alsager in 1845
and 46, which resulted in the ' Beethoven Quartet
Society.' He was also a constant leader at the
performances of the Musical Union, the Quartet
Association, the Monday Popular Concerts, etc.,
etc. On the establishment of the Royal Italian
Opera at Covent Garden, April 6, 1847, Mr.
Sainton became leader of the orchestra, a post
which he held until 1871, when he accompanied
Sir Michael Costa to the rival house, and re
mained there till 1880. He was leader of the
Philharmonic band from 1846 to 1854 inclu
sive, and of the Sacred Harmonic Society since
1848, conducting the performances of the latter
Society in the absence of his chief, as he did those
of the Opera. He has been also for many years
leader of the Birmingham Festivals, and other
provincial musical performances. From 1848 to
55 he was conductor of the State Band and
Violin Solo to the Queen, resigning the post of
his own accord. At the opening of the Inter
national Exhibition of 1862 Mr. Sainton con
ducted the performance of Sterndale Bennett's
Ode (to Tennyson's words) and was presented by
the composer with the autograph of the work as
a token of his gratitude and consideration.
Among the many pupils whom he has formed
SAINTON.
during his long career as Professor of the Violin
at the Royal Academy may be mentioned H.
Weist Hill [see WEIST HILL], F. Amor, A. C.
Mackenzie, A. Burnett, Miss Gabrielle Vaillant,
W. Sutton, and many more good players. His
works comprise 2 Concertos for the violin with
orchestra ; a Solo de Concert ; a Rondo mazurka ;
3 Romances ; several airs with variations ; and
numerous Fantasias on operas. In 1860 Mr.
Sainton married Miss Dolby the well-known
English contralto singer. [G.]
SAINTON-DOLBY, CHARLOTTE HELEN, was
born in London in 1821, and gave signs of pos
sessing decided musical talent when still young.
Her earliest instructress was a Mrs. Montague,
from whom she received pianoforte lessons. On
the death of her father Miss Dolby determined
to adopt the musical profession, and in 1832
entered the Royal Academy of Music, where she
first studied under Mr. J.Bennett and Mr. Elliott,
and then under Signor Crivelli. In 1837 so-
great was her promise that she was elected a
King's Scholar, although her voice was still
weak and not fully developed. She remained
at the Academy for five years, and after leaving
was elected an honorary member of the institu
tion. Almost from the date of her first appear
ance in public, until her retirement in 1870,
Miss Dolby remained unrivalled as a singer of
oratorio and English ballads. The admirable
skill with which she controlled a powerful
contralto voice, the exquisite intonation, perfect
enunciation, and noble declamation which dis
tinguished her singing, c<iused her to take a
very high place, not only among English, but
among European artists of the present century.
She made her first appearance at the Philhar
monic in a quartet, June 14, 1841, and in a
solo, April 14, 1842. In the winter of 1846-7,
Mendelssohn, who had been delighted by her
singing in 'St. Paul,' obtained for her an engage
ment at the Gewandhaus Concerts at Leipzig,
where she appeared with as great success as
she had done in England. About this time
Mendelssohn dedicated to her his Six1 Songs
(op. 57) > besides writing the contralto music in
' Elijah ' with the special view to her singing
it. Her success in Leipzig was followed by
several concert tours in France and Holland,
in both of which countries Miss Dolby esta
blished her reputation as a singer of the first
rank. In 1860 she married M. Prosper Sainton,
the eminent violinist, and ten years later she
retired from public life. In 1872 Mme. Sainton
opened her Vocal Academy, at which she has
successfully trained many excellent artists in the
admirable school of pure vocalisation, of which
she ^ is herself so distinguished an example.
Besides her labours in connection with this
Academy, Mme. Sainton has of late years ap
peared before the world as a composer. Her
cantatas 'The Legend of St. Dorothea,' and
'The Story of the Faithful Soul,' produced
respectively at St. James's Hall on June 14,
1 Also dedicated to Mme. Livia Frege.
SALAMAN.
217
1876, and Steinway Hall on June 19, 1879,
have been performed in the provinces and the
colonies with unvaried success. Mme. Sainton
has also written many ballads and songs, and is
(iSSi) engaged upon a work of more importance
than she has yet attempted. [W.B.S.]
SAL A, NICOLA, born at a little village near
Benevento, Naples, in i/oi, and brought up in
the Conservatorio della Pieta de' Turchini under
Fago, Abos, and Leo. He died in 1800, and
devoted the whole of a long life to his Conser
vatorio, in which he succeeded Fago as second
master, and Cafaro, in 1787, as first master.
The great work to which all his energies were
devoted was his ' Regole del contrappunto
prattico,' in 3 large volumes, containing methodi
cal instruction in the composition of fugues,
canons, etc., which was published in 1794.
During the disturbances in Italy the engraved
plates vanished for a time and were supposed to
be lost. Choron then reprinted the work (Paris
1808), but the plates were afterwards discovered.
Both editions are in the Library of the
Sacred Harmonic Society. Sala wrote little
besides this work. Three operas, 'Volog-ero,'
1737; 'Zenobia,' 1761; and 'Merope,' 1769; an
oratorio, ' Giuditta/ 1780 ; 3 ' Prologues' on the
births of kings of Naples ; a Mass, a Litany,
and a few smaller pieces, are mentioned by
Florimo (Cenno storico, 562). [G.]
SALAMAN, CHARLES KENSINGTON, born
in London, March 3, 1814 ; began music early —
violin, PF., and composition. In 1824 was elected
student of the Royal Academy of Music, but
soon left it and became pupil of Mr. Neate, the
friend of Beethoven. He made his first public
appearance at Blackheath, in 1828, as a PF.
player ; then went to Paris and took lessons of
Herz, and in the following summer returned to
London and began teaching, playing, and writing.
In 1830 he composed an ode for the Shakespeare
commemoration, which was performed atStratford-
on-Avon April 23, and was repeated in London.
From 1833 to 1837 ne gave annual orchestral
concerts in London, at one of which he played
Mendelssohn's G minor Concerto for the third
time in England — the former two performances
having been by the composer himself. In 1846,
7, and 8 he resided at Rome, and while conduct
ing Beethoven's Symphony No. 2 (for the first
time in Rome), the concert was interrupted by
the news of Louis Philippe's flight from Paris.
On March 18, 1850, he played at the Philhar
monic. In 1855 he began a series of lectures on
the History of the Pianoforte, and other musical
subj'ects, which he continued both in London and
the country for several years. In 1858 he was
one of the founders of the MUSICAL SOCIETY OP
LONDON, and acted as secretary to i-t until the
year 1865. He is now one of the Committee
of the MUSICAL ASSOCIATION. Mr. Salaman has
been for many years a well-known professor and
teacher of music in London. He has composed
many songs, sonae to words by Horace, Catullus,
and Anacreon ; Psalms (the 84th, 2pth) ; and
218
SALAMAN.
various PF. pieces. He contributed to ' Concordia,'
during its existence, and still occasionally writes
in the ' Musical Times.' [G.]
SALCIONAL or SALICET, a soft-toned
organ-stop of a reedy quality. The pipes are of
a very small scale, the tenor C being of about the
same diameter as the middle C of an ordinary
open diapason. The mouth is also much more
'cut up' than that of a diapason pipe. The
origin of the word Salicet is plain ; to this day
country boys make toy wind-instruments out of
'withy'; but withy is also called 'sally,' and
'sally' is salix a willow. In some counties a
willow is called (by combining both names) a
' sally-withy.' A Salicet is therefore a stop made
to imitate a rustic ' willow-pipe.' The introduc
tion of the Salcional or Salicet was later than
that of the Dulciana (said to have been invented
by Snetzler), and it must be considered merely
as a variety of that stop. It is of 8 ft. or unison
pitch. [J.S.]
SALE, JOHN, born at Gainsborough, March 19,
1734, was admitted in 1766 a lay clerk of St.
George's Chapel, Windsor, and held that post
until his death, Oct. 2, 1802.
His son, JOHN, born in London in 1758, was
in 1767 admitted a chorister of St. George's
Chapel, Windsor, and Eton College under William
Webb, and so continued until 1775. In 1777 he
obtained a lay clerk's place in both choirs. On
July 12, 1783, he was admitted a gentleman of
the Chapel Royal in the room of Nicholas Lade or
Ladd ; in 1 794 he succeeded John Soaper as vicar
choral of St. Paul's ; and in 1 796 John Hindle as lay
vicar of Westminster Abbey. At Christmas 1 7 96 he
resigned his appointments at Windsor and Eton.
In 1800 he succeeded Richard Bellamy as almoner
and master of the choristers of St. Paul's. On
Jan. 14, 1812, he was appointed successor to
Samuel Webbe as secretary to the Catch Club,
and soon afterwards resigned his places of almoner
and master of the choristers of St. Paul's. He
was also conductor of the Glee Club. He pos
sessed a rich, full, and mellow-toned bass voice,
and sang with distinct articulation and energetic
expression. He was for thirty years a principal
singer at the Concert of Ancient Music and other
leading concerts in London, and at various pro
vincial festivals. He composed several glees,
which were included, with glees by Lord Mor-
nington and other composers, in collections
published by him. He died Nov. u, 1827. He
left two sons, viz. —
JOHN BERNARD, born at Windsor, 1779, and
admitted a chorister of St. George's Chapel,
Windsor, and Eton College in 1785. In 1800 he
succeeded Richard Bellamy as lay vicar of West
minster Abbey; on Jan. 19, 1803 was admitted
a gentleman of the Chapel Royal, in the place of
Samuel Champness, and in 1806, on the death of
Richard Guise, obtained a second lay vicar's place
at Westminster Abbey.1 On March 30, 1809, he
i In order to understand how one person could perform the duties
Of two in the same choir it is necessary to explain that by long-
, standing custom each lay vicar attends during six months of the
'year only, i. e. in each alternate month.
SALIERI.
succeeded Michael Kock as organist of St
Margaret's, Westminster. About 1826 he wai
appointed musical instructor to the Princess (ncro
Queen) Victoria. In 1838 he was admittec
organist of the Chapel Royal on the death o
Attwood. His voice was a powerful bass, anc
his style of singing chaste and refined; h<
excelled in anthems, glees and other part singing
He was for many years principal second bass al
the Concert of Ancient Music. He long enjoyec
a high reputation as a teacher of singing and th<
pianoforte. His compositions were few, consisting
only of some chants, psalm-tunes, Kyries, glees
songs and duets. One of his duets, ' The Butterfly,
was long in favour. In 1837 he published a col
lection of psalm and hymn tunes, chants, etc.
with a concise system of chanting. He died Sept,
16, 1856. Of his three daughters, two, MABI
ANNE and SOPHIA, were organists and teachers
of music; Sophia died May 3, 1869. The youngest,
LAURA, was the wife of William John Thorns,
the antiquary, and originator of 'Notes and
Queries.'
The other son, GEORGE CHARLES, born at
Windsor in 1796, was admitted a chorister oi
St. Paul's under his father in 1803. He afterwards
became a skilful organist, in 1817 succeeded Dr.
Busby as organist of St. Mary, Newington, and in
1826 was appointed organist of St. George's, Han
over Square. He died Jan. 23, 1869. [W.H.H.]
SALIERI, ANTONIO, Court-capellmeister at
Vienna, son of a wealthy merchant, born Aug.
19, 1750, at Legnano in the Venetian territory,
learnt music early from his brother Franz, a
pupil of Tartini. After the death of his parents
a friend of the family named Mocenigo took him
to Venice, where he continued his studies, and
made the acquaintance of Gassmann, composer
and late Capellmeister to the Emperor, who be
came much interested in him, and took him to
Vienna in June 1766. Here Gassmann con
tinued his fatherly care, provided his protegd
with teachers and himself instructed him in
composition, made him acquainted with Meta-
stasio, and introduced him to the Emperor
Joseph, whose chamber-concerts he henceforth
attended, and often took an active part in.
While Gassmann was in Rome, composing an
opera for the Carnival of 1770, Salieri conducted
the rehearsals for him, and composed his own
first comic opera, 'Le Donne letterate,' which
received the approval of Gluck and Calsabigi,
and was performed with success at the Burg-
theater. On Gassmann's death in 1774 Salieri
returned his paternal kindness by doing all in
his power for the family, and educating the two
daughters as opera singers. In the same year
the Emperor appointed him court composer, and
on Bonno's death in 1788 he became Court-
capellmeister. He was also a director of the
Opera for 24 years, till 1790, when he resigned,
and out of compliment to him the post waa
given to his pupil Weigl. In 1778 Salieri was
in Italy, and composed five operas for Venice,
Milan, and Rome. For the Emperor's newly-
founded National-Singspiel he wrote ' Der Bauch'
SALIERI.
fangkehrer' (1781), and for a fete at Schb'nbrunn
'Prima la musica, poi le parole' (I786).1 When
the Academic de Musique in Paris requested
Gluck to suggest a composer who could supply
them with a French opera in wbich his own prin
ciples should be carried out, he proposed Salieri,
who accordingly received the libretto of 'Les
Dana'ides' from Moline, worked at it under
Gluck's supervision, and personally superin
tended its production in Paris (April 26, 1784). 2
He was entrusted with librettos for two more
operas, and returned with a great increase of
fame to Vienna, where he composed an opera
buffa, 'La Grotto di Trofonio' (Oct. 12, 1785),
the best of its kind and one of his finest works,
wbich had an extraordinary success, and was
engraved by Artaria. In 1787 he again visited
Paris, where the first of his operas, ' Les Horaces,'
had failed (Dec. 7, 1 786), owing to a variety of
untoward circumstances, a failure amply retrieved
however by the brilliant success of 'Axur, Be
d'Ormus' (June 8, 1787) or 'Tarare,' as it was
first called. This, which has remained his most
important work, was first performed in Vienna,
Jan. 8, 1788. Another work composed in Vienna
for Paris was a cantata, ' Le Dernier Jugement ' 3
(libretto by Chevalier Roger), ordered by the
Societ^ d'Apollon, and performed there and at
the Concerts Spirituels with great applause from
the connoisseurs. In 1801 Salieri went to
Trieste to conduct an opera composed for the
opening of a new opera-house. This was his
last Italian opera, and 'Die Neger' (Vienna,
1804) his last German one, for owing to his
dislike to the change of taste in dramatic
music, he devoted himself chiefly to church
music, composing also a few instrumental pieces,
choruses, and canons in various parts, published
as 'Scherzi armonici.' On June 16, 1816, he
celebrated the fiftieth anniversary of the com
mencement of his career in Vienna, when he
was decorated with the gold ' Civil-Ehren-
medaille ' and chain, and honoured by a fete, at
which were performed special compositions by
each of his pupils, including Schubert.4 Salieri
was also vice-president of the Tonkiinstler So-
ciet'at, and till 1818 conducted nearly all the
concerts. For the twenty -fifth anniversary of
its foundation (1796) he composed a cantata
'La Riconoscenza/ and for the fiftieth (1821) a
part-song, ' Zu Ehren Joseph Haydn,' to whom
the society was largely indebted. Salieri was
also a generous contributor to the funds. He
took great interest in the foundation of the
Conservatorium (1817) and wrote a singing-
method for the pupils. He lost his only son
i Mozart's ' Schauspieldirector ' was given the same evening.
The play-bill of the first 12 performances described it as an opera
by Gluck and Salieri, in accordance with a stipulation of the pub-
;sher Deslauriers, but before the 13th representation Gluck publicly
stated in the ' Journal de Paris ' that Salieri was the sole author.
The following anecdote is connected with this cantata. Salieri
was talking over the difficulties of the work with Gluck, especially as
to the voice to be assigned to the part of Christ, for which he finally
proposed a high tenor. Gluck assented, adding, half in joke, half in
earnest, ' Before long I will send you word from the other world in
what key our Saviour speaks.' Four days later, Nov. 15, 1787, he was
dead.
•> The autograph of Schubert's Cantata— both words and music by
him-was sold by auction in Paris, May H, 1881.
SALIEKI.
219
in 1805, and his wife in 1807, and never re
covered his spirits after it. During his latter
years he suffered much, but never failed to
derive comfort from the beauties of nature, for
which he had always a great taste. On June
14, 1824, after fifty years of service at court,
he was allowed to retire on his full salary, and
not long afterwards died, May 7, 1825.
His biographer, Edler von Mosel ('Ueber das
Leben und die Werke des Anton Salieri,' Vienna,
1827), describes him as a methodical, active, re
ligious-minded, benevolent, and peculiarly grate
ful man, easily irritated, but as quickly pacified.
He was very fond of sweets, especially pastry and
sugar-plums, and drank nothing but water. We
have seen how he discharged his obligations to
Gassmann. He gave gratuitous instruction and
substantial aid of various kinds to many poor
musicians, and to the library of the Tonkiinstler
Societat he bequeathed 41 scores in his own
handwriting (34 operas, and 7 cantatas) now in
the Hofbibliothek. In accordance with his own
wish his Requiem was performed after his death
at the Italian church. He remained throughout
on cordial terms with Haydn, whose two great
oratorios he often conducted, and Beethoven de
dicated to him in 1799 three sonatas for PF. and
violin, op. 12 (Artaria). In the first vol. of his
'Beethoven's Studien' (Rieter-Biedermann, 1873),
Mr. Nottebohm has printed ten Italian vocal
pieces, submitted by Beethoven to Salieri, with
the corrections of the latter. These chiefly con
cern the arrangement of the notes to the words,
so as to conform to the rules of Italian prosody,
and produce the best effect. The pieces are
undated, but internal evidence fixes them to
the period between 1793 and 1802. It appears
that as late as 1809 the great composer con
sulted his old adviser as to the arrangement of
his Italian, probably in the 'Four Ariettas and
Duet' of op. 82; and that even then, when
Beethoven was so fiercely independent of all
other musicians, their relations were such that he
voluntarily styled himself ' Salieri's pupil.' 5 As
regards Mozart, Salieri cannot escape censure, for
though the accusation of having been the cause
of his death has been long ago disproved, it is
more than possible that he was not displeased
at the removal of so formidable a rival. At
any rate though he had it in his power to in
fluence the Emperor in Mozart's favour, he not
only neglected to do so, but even intrigued
against him, as Mozart himself relates in a letter
to his friend Puchberg.6 After his death how
ever, Salieri befriended his son, and gave him a
testimonial, which secured him his first appoint
ment.7
5 See Moscheles's Life, 1. 10. « Nottebohm's ' Mozartiana,' 64.
7 ' lo qui sottoscritto faccio fede che il giovine Signor Wolfgango
Amadeo Mozart, gia bravo suonator di Pianoforte, ha un talento raro
per la musica; che perfezionarsi in quest' arte, di cui egli fa pro-
fessione, dopo aver studiato le regole del contrappunto sotto la
scuoia del Signor Albrechtsberger Maestro di Capella di S. Stefano,
ora pratico sotto di me, e che ne prognostico una riuscita non in-
feriore a quella del suo celebre Padre. ANTONIO SALIERI, primp
Maestro di Cappella della corte imperiale di Vienna. Vienna, 30
Marzo, 1807.'—' I the undersigned certify that the young Signor W. A.
Mozart, already a good player on the PF., has a rare talent for
music, to perfect himself in which, having studied the rules of
counterpoint iu the school of Sig. Albrechtsberger, Maestro di Capella
220
SALIERI.
His works were too much in accordance with
the taste, albeit the best taste, of the day to
survive. He drew up a catalogue of them in
1818. They comprise 5 Masses, a Requiem,
3 Te Deums, and several smaller church works;
4 oratorios (^including * La Passione di Gesu
Christo,' performed by the Tonkiinstler Societat
in 1777); I French, 3 Italian, and 2 German
cantatas, and 5 patriotic part-songs ; several in
strumental pieces; 3 operas to French, and 33
to Italian words ; I German Singspiel, I German
opera ('Die Neger'), and numerous vocal pieces
for one or more voices, choruses, canons, frag
ments of operas, etc. [C.F.P.J
SALMON, ELIZA, whose maiden name was
Munday, was born at Oxford in 1787. Her
mother's family had produced several good
musicians; her uncle, William Mahon (born
1753, died at Salisbury, May 2, 1816), was the
best clarinetist of his day ; her aunts, Mrs.
Warton, Mrs. Ambrose, and Mrs. Second, were
excellent singers of the second rank. She was
a pupil of John Ashley, and made her first
appearance at Covent Garden in the Lenten
concerts given by him under the name of
'oratorios,' March 4, 1803. About 1805 she
married James Salmon, and went to reside at
Liverpool, where she became distinguished as a
concert singer, occasionally appearing in London,
and rapidly attaining the highest popularity. In
1812 she sang at Gloucester Festival, and in
1815 at the Concert of Ancient Music. From
that time to the close of her career her services
were in constant request at nearly all the
concerts, oratorios, and festivals in town and
country. Her voice was a pure soprano of the
most beautiful quality, of extensive compass,
very brilliant tone, and extraordinary flexibility.
She excelled in songs of agility, and was unsur
passed for the rapidity, neatness, and certainty
of her execution, and the purity of her taste in
the choice of ornament. In the higher and more
intellectual qualities of singing, expression and
feeling, she was wanting. But she extorted
admiration, even from those most sensible of her
deficiencies, by the exquisite loveliness of her
voice and the ease with which she executed the
most difficult passages. She unfortunately
acquired the habit of intemperance, which even
tually occasioned derangement of the nervous
system, and in 1825 she suddenly lost her voice.
She visited the continent, hoping by change and
rest to recover it, but in vain ; the jewel was
gone never to be regained. She endeavoured to
gain a livelihood by teaching singing, but,
although she was well qualified for it, the
ignorant public concluded that, as she herself
had lost the power of singing, she was incapable
of instructing others. She re-married a Rev.
Mr. Hinde, who died leaving her totally destitute.
A concert was given for her relief, June 24,
1840, which proved a complete failure. She
Gradually sank into a state of the greatest
at S.Stephen's, he is now practising under me, to that degree that I
predict a result not inferior to that of his celebrated father. ANTONIO
SALLERI. principal Maestro di Cupella of the Imperial Court of Vienna,
Vienna, March 30,
SALOMON.
poverty, and was dependent upon the bounty
of those who had known her in prosperity for
subsistence. In 1845 an effort was made to
raise a fund to purchase an annuity for her. but
it was only partially successful. She died at
No. 33 King's Road East, Chelsea, June 5,
1849. Her death was registered in the names
of Eliza Salmon Hinde.
Her husband, JAMES SALMON, son of James
Salmon (gentleman of the Chapel Royal, Nov.
30, 1789, vicar choral of St. Paul's, and lay clerk
of St. George's Chapel, Windsor, died 1827),
received his early musical education as a
chorister of St. George's, Windsor. In 1805 he
was appointed organist of St. Peter's, Liverpool,
and was in much esteem as a performer. In
1813, having fallen into embarrassed circum
stances (by some attributed to his wife's
extravagance, and by others to his own irregu
larities), he enlisted as a soldier and went with
his regiment to the West Indies, where he died.
WILLIAM, another son of James Salmon, sen.,
born 1789, was also a chorister of St. George's.
He was admitted a gentleman of the Chapel
Royal, May 28, 1817, and was also lay vicar of
Westminster Abbey and lay clerk of St. George's,
Windsor. With an ungrateful voice he sang
with much taste and expression, and was an
excellent singing master. He died at Windsor,
Jan. 26, 1858. [W.H.H.]
SALO, GASPARO DI, a celebrated violin-maker
of Brescia, probably born at Salo, a small town
on the lake of Garda. The date of his birth is
unknown, but he is supposed to have worked dur
ing the latter years of the i6th and earlier years
of the i 7th century. Gasparo cli Salo was one of
the earliest makers of stringed instruments who
employed the pattern of the violin as distin
guished from that of the viol. His works are of
a primitive pattern, more advanced than that of
Zanetto and other old Brescian makers, but totally
different from that of the contemporary Amati
family. The model varies, being sometimes high,
sometimes flat : the middle curves are shallow,
and the sound-holes straight and angular. The
wood is generally well chosen, and the thick
nesses are correct ; and the tone of the instrument,
when of the flat model and in good preservation,
peculiarly deep and penetrating. The pattern of
Gasparo di Salo was partially revived in the last
century, owing no doubt to its great tone-produc
ing capacity, by the celebrated Joseph Guarnerius
(see that article), and to a less extent by some
of the French makers. As a maker of tenors and
double-basses Gasparo di Salo has never had an
equal, and his instruments of these classes are
eagerly sought after. The objection to his tenors
is their great size, but their effect in a quartet is
unrivalled. The two finest specimens known, for
merly in the possession of Dr. Steward of Wolver-
hampton, are now in the collection of Mr. John
Adam of Blackheath. Gaspare's violins, which
are mostly of small size, are not in request for
practical purposes. [E.J.P-]
SALOMON, JOHANN PETER, a name in
separably connected with that of Hay.cln, born
SALOMON.
at Bonn,1 Feb. 1745 (christened Feb. 2), early
became an expert violinist, and in 1758 was
admitted into tlie orchestra of the Elector Clement
August. In 1765 he made a concert-tour to
Frankfort and Berlin ; and Prince Henry of
Prussia, who had an orchestra and a small French
opera -company at Rheinsberg, made him his
Concertmeister, and composer of operettas. He
had already showed his appreciation for Haydn
by introducing his symphonies whenever he could.
On the prince's sudden dismissal of his band,
Salomon went to Paris, where he was well re
ceived, but being so near London he determined
to go on there, and on March 23, 1781, made his
first appearance at Covent-Garden Theatre. The
pieces on this occasion were Mason's ' Elfrida,'
set to music by Dr. Arne, and Collins's ' Ode
on the Passions,' with solos and choruses by
Dr. Arnold, both of which he led, besides play
ing a solo in the middle. The ' Morning Herald,'
says of him ' He does not play in the most grace
ful style, it must be confessed, but his tone and
execution are such as cannot fail to secure him
a number of admirers in the musical world.'
From this time he frequently appeared at
concerts as soloist, quartet -player (violin and
viola) and conductor. He quarrelled with the
directors of the Professional Concerts, soon after
their foundation, and thenceforward took an in
dependent line. During Mara's first season in
London, in 1784, he conducted and played solos
at all her concerts. The 'Morning Chronicle'
says, in 1785, 'Salomon's solo, though perhaps
not excelling in tone, was in the greatest point,
in pathetic impression, excelled by none ! Whose
violin-playing approaches nearer the human
voice ? On the whole Salomon is a mannerist, but
he has much originality — he is very susceptible
— he is a genius.' In 1786 he gave a series of
subscription concerts at the Hanover Square
Rooms, and produced symphonies by Haydn
and Mozart. From that time he contented
himself with an annual benefit concert, but acted
as leader at others, both in London, as at
the A cademy of Ancient Music in 1 789 ; and
elsewhere, as at the Oxford Commemoration,
Winchester and Dublin. A grand chorus com
posed by him in honour of the King's re
covery, performed by the New Musical Fund
in 1789, and repeated at his own concert, was
his one successful vocal piece. He removed in
1790 to No. 1 8 Great Pulteney Street (opposite
Broadwood's), in which house Haydn stayed
with him in the following year. The two had
long been in correspondence, Salomon endea
vouring in vain to secure the great composer
for a series of concerts ; but as he was at
Cologne on his way from Italy, where he had
been to engage singers for the Italian Opera,
he saw in the papers the death of Prince
Esterhazy, hurried to Vienna, and carried
Haydn back in triumph with him to London.
This period of Haydn's stay in England was the
most brilliant part of Salomon's career as an
1 Th° Salomons' house was 515 BonngassB, the same in which
Beethure.i vras burn.
SALTAEELLO.
221
artist, and after the return of the former to
Vienna the two continued the best of friends.
In 1796 Salomon resumed his concerts, at which
he was assisted by Mara, the young tenor
Braham, and his own promising pupil Pinto.
On April 21, 1800, he produced Haydn's 'Crea
tion ' at the King's Theatre, though not for the
first time in England, as he had been forestalled
by John Ashley (Covent Garden, March 28).
Salomon's active career closes with the founda
tion of the Philharmonic Society, in which he
took a great interest, playing in a quintet of
Boccherini's, and leading the orchestra, at the
first concert in the Argyll Rooms, March 8,
1813. Up to the last he was busy planning
an Academy of Music with his friend Ayrton.
A fall from his horse caused a long illness,
from which he died Nov. 28, 1815, at his house
No. 70 Newman Street. He was buried Dec. 2
in the south cloister of Westminster Abbey. He
bequeathed his house to the Munchs of Bonn,
his next of kin ; £200 to F. Hies, for the benefit
of his brother Hubert ; and his Stradivarius violin
(said to have belonged to Corelli, and to have
his name upon it) to Sir Patrick Blake, Bart.,
of Bury S. Edmunds.2
Salomon was, on the whole, a first-rate solo-
player, but his special field was the quartet, in
which he showed himself a solid and intelligent
musician. Haydn's last quartets were composed
especially to suit his style of playing.
He was a man of much cultivation, and
moved in distinguished society. Bland published
an engraving of him by Facius from Hardy's
picture. Another portrait by Lansdale was sent
by Salomon himself to the Museum at Bonn.
His best epitaph is contained in a letter from
Beethoven to his pupil Ries in London (Feb. 28,
1816) : 'Salomon's death grieves me much, for
he was a noble man, and I remember him ever
since I was a child.' 3 [C.F.P.]
SALTARELLO or SALTARELLA (Latin
saltare, to jump).
I. In 16th-century collections of dance tunes
the melodies usually consist of two distinct divi
sions, the first of which is written in common
time, the second in 3 time. The former was
probably danced like our English country-dances
(i.e. the dancers standing in two lines facing
each other) and bore the distinguishing name of
the dance, while the latter was like the modern
round dance and was variously entitled Nachtanz,
Proportio, Hoppeltanz, or Saltarello, the first
three being the German and the last the Italian
names for the same movement. Thus in Bern-
hard Schmidt's Tabulaturbuch (Strasburg, 1577)
are found the following dances : ' Possomezzo
Coniun' with fll suo Saltarello'; 'Ein guter
Hofdantz' with 'Nachdantz'; ' Alemando no-
vello. Ein guter neuer Dantz' with 'Proportz
darauf ' ; and ' Ein guter neuer Dantz ' with
' Hoppeldantz darauf.' Similarly in Queen Eliza-
2 See the 'Westminster Abbey Registers,' by 3. L. Chester, D.C.L.
Sir P. Blake's property was sold after his death, and nothing is now
known by the family about the vioHn.
3 Pohl's ' Haydn in London,' 73 to 85.
222
SALTAEELLO.
beth's Virginal Book (preserved at Cambridge
in the Fitzwilliam Museum) there is an elaborate
' Galiarda Passamezzo ' by Peter Philips (dated
1502) which consists of ten 8-bar 'divisions,' the
9th of which is entitled ' Saltarella. ' The Salta-
rello, or Proportio, was always founded on the air
of the first part of the dance, played in 3 time
with a strong accent on the first beat of the bar.
The manner in which this was done will be seen
by examining the following example, from the
2nd book of Caroso da Sermoneta's • Nobilta di
Dame' (Venice, 1600). It is part of a Balletto
' Laura Soave,' the second part of which (a Gag-
liarda) and the last 40 bars of the SaltareUo are
not printed here for want of space.
Si torna dfar un altra volta.
Gagliarda. Saltarella.
m
jBunBl
etc.
II. A popular Roman dance, in 3-4 or 6-8
time, danced by one or two persons, generally a
man and a woman, the latter of whom holds up
her apron throughout the dance. The step is
quick and hopping, and the dance gradually in
creases in rapidity as the dancers move round in
a semicircle, incessantly changing their position,
and moving their arms as violently as their legs.
The music is generally in the minor, and is played
on a guitar or mandoline, with tambourine ac
companiment. The finale to Mendelssohn's Ita
lian Symphony contains two Saltarellos —
I. - 3 -.3
etc.
etc.
in each of which the jumping or hopping step
is very apparent. In contrast to these is a
Tarantella, used as a third subject, a continuous
flow of even triplets. [W.B.S.]
SALVAYRE, GERVAIS BERNARD, born June
24, 1847, at Toulouse, and educated at the
Maitrise and the Conservatoire, where he stu
died the piano and harmony, and took a first
prize for cello. He then went to Paris, entered
SALVE KEGINA.
the Conservatoire, and studied composition under
Ambroise Thomas, and the organ under Benoist.
He made his way upwards slowly, taking the
first organ-prize in 1868, and the Grand Prix
not till 1872, though he had been a competitor
since 1867. At that time Bazin was professor of
composition, Thomas having become director of
the Conservatoire. During his two years in
Rome Salvayre learned the mandoline, and made
himself thoroughly acquainted with the lella
lingua Romana ; and his first publications (Milan,
Ricordi) were some Italian songs — ' Sospiri miei,'
' Inamoramento,' ' Dolore del tradimento,' ' Sere-
nata romana,' and ' Serenata di Francesca da
Rimini.' Industrious to a degree, he brought
back (besides the regulation compositions as
government student, which he had punctually
forwarded) a number of compositions in various
styles, and was thus ready for any opportunity
which might bring him into notice. Among
these Roman works were a ' Stabat Mater ' ; an
orchestral piece, 'Les Bacchantes'; the H3th
Psalm for orchestra, solos and chorus ; and an
oratorio, ' Le Jugement dernier,' which he subse
quently remodelled, and produced at the Chatelet
concerts as 'La Resurrection' (1876). Other
compositions were an 'Ouverture Symphonique'
(Concerts populaires), and a brilliant divertisse
ment for the ballet inserted in Grisar's ' Amours
du Diable* on its revival (Chatelet, Nov. 1874).
Having at length found his way to the boards,
Salvayre produced at the Gaiete' (then recently
transformed into an opera under Albert Vizentini)
« Le Bravo ' (April 1 8, 1877), libretto by Blavet,
from Cooper's novel. The piece was transformed
from an opera comique into a spectacular drama,
and had an immense success, partly owing to the
singing of Bouhy the baritone, and Heilbron the
prima donna. It has since been performed at
several theatres of importance both in France
and elsewhere. ' Le Fandango,' a one-act ballet
(Opera, Nov. 26, 1877), was ^ess fortunate. So
far M. Salvayre's gift seems rather for stage and
dramatic music than for light comedy, or more
poetical conceptions. [G.C.]
SALVE REGINA. One of the 'Antiphons
of the Blessed Virgin Mary,' appointed, in the
Roman Breviary, to be sung, from the Feast of
the Holy Trinity to the Saturday before the First
Sunday in Advent, either at the end of Compline,
or, when Compline is not sung, at the end of
Vespers.
The Plain Chaunt Melody of 'Salve Regina'
—a noble example of the use of the Mixed
Dorian Mode — rarely fails, by its melodious
Intervals, and rich Ligatures, to attract the at
tention of English visitors to foreign Cathedrals.
Modus I et II.
Sal - - - ve Ee
gi
na,
^ " ^
ma - ter mi - se - ri - cor -------- dl-«e, etc.
SALVE REGINA.
Since the I5th century, it has been frequently
treated, in the Motet style, with excellent effect.
Palestrina has left us five superb settings, four
of which are included in Messrs. Breitkopf &
Hartel's new edition of his works ; and most of
the other great Masters of the Polyphonic Schools
have left at least an equal number. It has also
been a favourite subject with modern Composers,
many of whom have treated it, more or less hap
pily, with Accompaniments for the Orchestra, or
Organ. Pergolesi's last composition was a ' Salve
Eegina,' which is generally regarded as his great
est triumph in the direction of Church Music.
What has been said of the 'Salve Regina'
applies, with equal force, to the Antiphons for
the Seasons of Advent, Lent, and Easter — 'Alma
Eedemptoris Mater,' ' Ave Regina,' and ' Regina
coeli'; the last of which, especially, has been
a great favourite, both with Polyphonic and
Modern Composers. [W.S.R.]
SAMSON. Oratorio by Handel, words com
piled by Newburgh Hamilton from Milton's
Samson Agonistes, Hymn on the Nativity, and
Lines on a Solemn Musick. The autograph of
the work is in the Buckingham Palace Library,
and contains the following dates: — end of ist
part, 'Sept. 29, 1741' (N.B. Messiah was fin
ished 1 4th of same month) ; end of 2nd part
' © (i.e. Sunday) Oct. II, 1741' ; end of chorus
'Glorious hero,' Tine dell' Oratorio, S. D. G.,
London, G. F. Handel, 11 (i.e. Thursday) Oct.
29, I741' j then the words ' Fine dell' Oratorio'
have been struck out, and 'Come, come,' ' Let the
bright,' and ' Let their celestial ' added, with a
note at end, ' S. D. G.— G. F. Handel, Oct. 1 2, 1 742 .'
It was produced at Covent Garden, Lent 1743 —
the first after Handel's return from Ireland.
Handel esteemed it as much as the Messiah,
and after his blindness wept when he heard the
air ' Total eclipse.' It was revived by the Sacred
Harmonic Society, Nov. 14, 1838, and has often
been performed since. The score was published
by Wright ; by Arnold in his edition ; by the
Handel Society (edited by Rimbault, 1852) ; and
by Breitkopf & Hartel (Chrysander, 1861). [G.]
SAN CARLO, the largest and most beauti
ful theatre of Naples, has almost the same pro
portions as La Scala of Milan, with which it
contends for the theatrical primacy in Italy. It
was built in 1737 by the architect Carasale, on
plans by Medrano, a General of the R. E., and
was completed with extraordinary celerity in only
nine months. Some alterations and improvements
were made in it by Fuga and Niccolini towards
the end of the last century. It was completely
burnt down in 1816, and rebuilt even more
elegantly and quickly than before, in six months,
by the said Antonio Niccolini. In 1844 San
Carlo underwent a thorough restoration and con
siderable improvement. It has now 6 tiers of
boxes, each tier numbering 32, without reckoning
the large and handsome royal box in their centre.
The theatre has also attached to it a large
ridotto or hall, notorious in former times for the
reckless gambling which took place there.
The best days of San Carlo were those in
SANCTUS.
223
which it was under the management of the great
impresario Domenico Barbaja from iSioto 1839.
During that period the greatest singers appeared
on its stage, amongst whom we need only name
Colbran, Sontag, Grisi, Tamburini, Rubini and
Lablache. Of many operas written expressly for
San Carlo and first produced there, we may
mention, besides those named under Rossini,
Bellini's first opera, ' Bianca and Fernando,' in
1826; Donizetti's 'Lucia di Lammermoor ' in
1835, and his last opera, ' Caterina Cornaro,'
in 1844; Mercadante's ' L'Apoteosi d'Ercole ' in
1819; and Ricci's 'L'Orfanella di Ginevra* in
1829, and ' La Festa di Piedigrotta' in 1852.
The true cause of the decadence of this great
theatre is to be found in the inability of the
Neapolitan public to pay sufficiently high prices
for the services of the great artists of our days.
The writer of this notice still remembers with
what uproar and protest the rise in the prices of
the stalls to 45. was received by the public of
Naples in 1860. Previously to that date the
ticket for a stall cost only the ridiculous sum of
2s. Thus, notwithstanding the annual subvention
granted by the municipality of Naples to the
lessee of San Carlo, he is unable to engage a great
star, the theatre not paying sufficiently for him
to incur such great expense.
Another of the opera-houses of Naples is the
theatre of IL FONDO, built at the royal expense
in 1778 by the architect Securo, and restored in
1849. The f°rm is quite round, with 5 tiers of
boxes. II Fondo is sometimes used for opera,
and sometimes for drama. Here Mercadante's
first work, a cantata, was produced in 1818.
IL TEATRO Noovo, built in 1724 by Carasale,
the architect of San Carlo, is wholly consecrated
to the representation of opera buft'a. Destroyed
by fire in 1861, it has been lately rebuilt. An
other opera house, SAN FERDINANDO, is a stand
ing example of the mistake of building theatres
in unsuitable localities, this theatre bringing to
ruin every lessee who has taken it, and being
left empty, however good the artists performing
on its stage. It was built in 1791, and is shut
the greater part of the year. Numerous other
small houses there are in Naples, where a kind
of musical medley is often performed, mostly in
the Neapolitan dialect, and where the lower
classes nightly crowd. The music of such operettas
is generally lively and tuneful, but hardly de
serves any other remark. [L.R.]
SANCTUS. I. The name given to that portion
of the Mass which immediately follows the Pre
face, and precedes the Consecration of the Host.
[See MASS.] The music of the Sanctus derives,
from the solemnity of the text, and the import
ance of its position in the Service, a peculiar sig
nificance, which has been rarely overlooked, by
Composers of any country, or period. In Plain
Chaunt Masses, the Melody to which it is adapt
ed is marked by a grave simplicity which renders
it capable of being sung, with good effect, at a
pace considerably slower than that of the 'Kyrie'
or ' Christe.'
The Great Masters of the Polyphonic Schools
224
SANCTUS.
have almost always treated it in Real Fugue, of
a peculiarly reverent character, not unlike that of
the ' Kyrie,3 but developed at greater length,
with frequent repetitions of the text, and three
distinct Subjects, adapted to the words, ' Sanctus,'
' Dominus Deus Sabaoth,' and ' Pleni sunt coeli
et terra.' Sometimes— as in Palestrina's Masses,
' Veni, sponsa Christ!,' and 'Dum complerentur' —
the ' Pleni sunt coeli ' forms a separate Movement,
assigned to three or four Solo Voices ; sometimes
the nature of the Subject indicates an accelerated
Tempo, without an actual solution of continuity,
as in the same Composer's ' ^Eterna Christ!
munera.' The ' Osanna,' with which the whole con
cludes, is either treated as a supplementary Move
ment, quite distinct from the 'Sanctus' itself;
or, less frequently, aids in the development of the
'Fugue, by the addition of a fourth Subject, with
out disturbing the homogeneity of the whole. In
the former case, the same ' Osanna ' usually serves
both for the ' Sanctus ' and the ' Benedictus,' * as
in the ' Missa Papse Marcelli,' and Vittoria's
' Simile est regnum coelorum ' : in the latter, the
treatment is usually of a very subdued character,
as in Palestrina's ' Tu es Petrus,' ' Assumpta est
Maria,' ' ^Rterna Christi munera,' and ' Missa
brevis.' These instances are particularly fine
ones ; and, indeed, it may be doubted whether
even Palestrina's genius ever rose to greater
sublimity of conception than in this part of the
' Missa brevis,' which, when interpreted by a
large body of Voices, singing in the most delicate
attainable pianissimo, presents us with the highest
ideal of the Song of the Heavenly Host that has
yet been reached.
The treatment of the 'Sanctus,' by modern
Composers, exhibits an infinite variety of styles ;
yet the Movement is, nearly always, the most
solemn one in the Mass. In Bach's great work
in B minor, an indescribably massive effect is
produced by the passages of sustained Chords,
beginning at the seventeenth and thirty-fifth Bars.
Very different is the idea developed in the cor
responding division of Beethoven's Mass in D.
The awe-struck character of the opening ' Adagio.
Mit Andacht,' however closely it may border upon
the dramatic, can scarcely impress the hearer
with any other feeling than that of the most pro
found reverence ; while the ' Allegro pesante ' of
the 'Pleni sunt coeli' is conceived in strict ac
cordance with the literal meaning of the words,
though nothing could possibly be more unsuited
to their position in the Service. This deplorable
incongruity is, however, more or less observable
in all Masses with Instrumental Accompaniment.
The same objection may be urged with equal pro
priety, against the combined 'Sanctus' and ' Bene
dictus,' in Cherubini's Requiem in C minor ; a
comparatively unpretending Movement, the per
sistent fortissimo of which can scarcely fail to
distract the mind far more seriously than even
i In order to explain the intimate connection between these Move
ments, it is necessary to remind the reader that the first ' Osanna ' is
immediately followed by the Consecration of the Host, which takes
place in silence. This completed, the 'Benedictus,' and second
' Osanna,' are sung, in continuation of the same train of ideas, and
not with the intention of introducing a new subject of contem
plation.
SANDERSON.
the sensuous beauty of a Movement like that in
Rossini's ' Messe Solennelle.' 2
To particularise the varied readings of the
' Sanctus/ to be found in the Masses of even the
greatest Composers of modern times, would be
impossible. The examples to which we have
called attention will serve as types of many
others ; and will, moreover, be valuable, as illus
trations of the one practical point of divergence
which, more than any other, distinguishes the
reading prevalent in the i6th century from that
most common in the I9th — the devotional piano,
from the pompous forte. So long as Drums and
Trumpets are permitted to take part in the Accom
paniments of the ' Sanctus,' so long will it fail to
attain that aesthetic consistency which alone can
ensure its ultimate perfection as a work of Art.
II. In Anglican ' Services,' the Sanctus is
usually a very unpretending Movement, written,
for the most part, in simple Harmony, without
any attempt at Fugal treatment, or even Imita
tion ; though, in the works of such Masters as
Tallis, Byrd, Farrant, Gibbons, and their con
temporaries, it is always noted for a quiet dignity
well worthy of the solemnity of the text. In
practice, it is too often removed from the place
assigned to it in the Prayer-Book, and sung be
tween the Litany and the Office for the Celebration
of the Holy Communion — an abuse which has, of
late years, excited much reprehension. [W.S.R.]
SANDERSON, JAMES, born in 1769 at
Workington, Durham, had from early childhood
a passion for music, and, without the assistance
of masters, so qualified himself that in 1783 he
was engaged as violinist at the Sunderland
Theatre. In 1784 he went to Shields as a
teacher of the violin and pianoforte, and met
with much success. In 1787 he was engaged as
leader at the Newcastle-upon-Tyne Theatre, and
in 1788 at Astley's Amphitheatre. 'In 1789 he
made his first attempt at dramatic composition
by writing instrumental interludes to illustrate
the several parts of Collins's ' Ode on the Passions,'
which the eminent tragedian, George Frederick
Cooke, was to recite on his benefit night at
Chester. His next work was 'Harlequin in
Ireland* at Astley's in 1792. In 1793 he was
engaged at the Royal Circus," afterwards the
Surrey Theatre, as composer and music director,
a post which he retained for many years. His
principal productions during that period were
' Blackboard,' 1798; 'Cora,' 1799; ' Sir Francis
Drake,' 1800 (in which was the song, 'Bound
'prentice to a waterman,' which became so great
a favourite with stage representatives of British
sailors that it was constantly introduced into
pieces in which a seaman formed one of the
characters for fully half a century), and 'Hal
lowe'en.' His 'Angling Duet,' originally com
posed for ' The Magic Pipe,' a pantomime pro
duced at the Adelphi, also enjoyed a long popu
larity. He composed many pieces for the violin.
He died in or about 1841. [W.H.H.]
2 We say nothing, here, of the strikingly beautiful Movements in
Mendelssohn's ' Elijah,' and Spohr's ' Last Judgment,' because, not
withstanding their opening words, the term 'Sauctus' cannot D
fairly applied to them, in its technical sense.
SANDYS.
SANDYS, WILLIAM, F.S.A., born 1792,
educated at Westminster School, and afterwards
called to the bar, is entitled to mention here as
editor of ' Christmas Carols, Ancient and Modern,
including the most popular in the West of
England, with the Tunes to which they are sung.
Also specimens of French Provincial Carols,'
1833 ; author of ' Christmastide, its history, festi
vities, and carols,' with 12 carol tunes, 1852 ; and
joint author with Simon Andrew Forster of ' The
History of the Violin and other instruments
played on with the bow. . . . Also an account of
the principal makers, English and foreign,' 1864.
He died Feb. 18, 1874. [W.H.H.]
SANG SCHOOLS, an old Scottish institution,
dating from the 1 3th century. A ' scule ' for
teaching singing existed in almost every one of
the cathedral cities in Scotland, and in many of
the smaller towns, such as Ayr, Dumbarton,
Lanark, Cupar and Irvine. Even in the far
north in 1544 Bishop Reid founded and endowed
a 'Sang School' in Orkney. Prior to the Re
formation the teaching in these schools was prin
cipally confined to ' musick, meaners, and vertu,'
but at a later date it extended to the proverbial
' three R's.' Music, however, seems to have been
the chief course of instruction, and the original
idea of confining its study to the cathedral singers
was so far enlarged, that laymen were admitted
to the schools, in which the Gregorian chant had
naturally an early and important place. The
master of the school was held in high esteem,
and was occasionally selected from the clergy,
the appointment at times leading to important
preferment — thus William Hay, master of the
Old Aberdeen School in 1658, was made Bishop
of Moray ; and John Leslie, Bishop of Ross, was
once a teacher in the Aberdeen School.
Great attention seems to have been paid by
the parliament of the day to the study of music,
for a statute was passed in 1574 'instructing
the provest, baillies, and counsale, to sett up ane
sang scuill, for instruction of the youth in the
art of musick and singing, quhilk is almaist
decayit and sail schortly decay without tymous
remeid be providit.' Comparatively little in
terest seems to have attended either the Edin
burgh or Glasgow schools, and from a minute of
the Town Council of the latter we gather that
the institution collapsed in 1588, 'the scuile
•-umtyme callit the sang scuile' being sold to
efray the expenses incidental to the heavy visit
ation of a plague. The Aberdeen school appears
to have been the one of chief celebrity, attracting
teachers of even continental fame, and the Burgh
records contain references of a curious and amus
ing description. The school existed so early as
the year 1370, its class of pupils being the same
as those attending the grammar school. Both
vocal and instrumental music were taught, as
we learn from the title of Forbes' s scarce
work, ' Cantus, Songs and Fancies both apt for
Voices and Viols as is taught in the Music
School of Aberdeen ' (1662). About this period,
Mace, in his 'Musick's Monument,' directed
the attention of his countrymen to the sang
VOL. in. PT. 2.
SANTINI.
225
school of Scotland as an institution well worthy
of imitation south of the Tweed. A few
excerpts from the Burgh records of Aberdeen
and other places may not be uninteresting, and
we give the following as a fair example of the
attention paid by the civic authorities of the day
to the subject of music. On Oct. 7. 1496, a con
tract was entered into between the Town Council
of Aberdeen and Robert Huchosone, sangster,
' who obliges himself by the faith of his body
all the days of his life to remain with the com
munity of the burgh, upholding matins, psalms,
hymns,' etc. etc., the council also giving him the
appointment of master of the Sang School. The
four following extracts are also from the Aber
deen Burgh records, as faithfully transcribed by
the editors of the Spalding Club publications.
4th October, 1577.
The said day the consell grantit the soume of four
poundis to the support of James Symsonne, doctour of
thair Sang Scuill, to help to buy him cloythis.
23 Novr., 1597.
The maister of the sang schoole sail serve bayth the
Kirkis in uptacking of the psalmes theirin.
1594.
Item to the Maister of the sang schoile xiiij.
1609.
' The bairnis and scoleris of the sang schoollis ' are
ordered to find caution for their good behaviour.
From Dundee Records, 1602.
Item to the master of the sang scule Ixxx Ibs.
From Air Records, 1027.
Item to the Mr of musick scule for teaching of the
musick scule and tacking rip the psalmes in the kirk x
bolls victuall and xiiij of silver.
From Irving Records, 1633.
Our doctour and musicianer jcii.
The stipend of the master of the Edinburgh
sang school appears to have been the modest
allowance of ten pounds in sterling money. It
may be worth mentioning that the building in
Aberdeen so long identified with the musical
interests of the day was sold only in 1758, and
those acquainted with the Granite-city may also
be interested in knowing the site of the sang
school — a feu near the churchyard wall in the
Back Wynd. An attempt was recently made to
form a connecting link with the past in the shape
of a proposed revival of the sang school. The
promoter of the movement purchased a hall, which
received the name of -'Song School,' but he has
not been encouraged to carry his spirited scheme
to a successful issue. [J.T.F.]
SANTA CHIARA. Opera in 3 acts; words
by Mad. Birch Pfeiffer, music by H.R.H. Ernest,
Duke of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Produced at Co-
burg, Oct. 15, 1854 ; at the Opera, Paris (French
translation by Oppelt), Sept. 27, 1855, an^, in-
Italian, at Co vent Garden, June 30, 1877. [G.]
SANTINI, FORTUNATO, the Abbe", a learned
musician, born in Rome, July 5, 1778, early lost
his parents, and was brought up in an orphanage,
but showed such talent for music that he was
put to study with Jannaconi, and received into
the Collegio Salviati. During his stay there
(until 1798) he occupied himself in copying and
scoring the church-music of the great masters,
and after his ordination in 1801 devoted his
Q
226
SANTINI.
whole life to music, copying, collating, and com
piling with unwearied industry. As an ecclesi
astic he had the entree to many libraries and
collections generally inaccessible, and set himself
to the task of scoring all important works then
existing only in parts. In 1820 he issued a
catalogue (46 pp., 1000 Nos.) of his music, the
MS. of which, containing more than the printed
one, is in the collection of the writer.1 A MS.
copy of a 'Catalogo della musica antica, sacra,
e madrigalesca, che si trova in Roma via dell'
anima no. 50 presso Fortunato Santini,' is in
the Fe'tis collection, No. 5166. His learning,
and practical knowledge of church-music, made
his assistance invaluable to all engaged in
musical research. He did much to make German
music known in Italy, translating Ranamler's
' Tod Jesu ' into Italian, and helping the intro
duction of Graun's music. Mendelssohn writes
(' Letters,' Rome, Nov. 2, 1830) ; 'The Abbe" has
long been on the look-out for me, hoping I should
bring the score of Bach's ' Passion.' And again
(Nov. 8), ' Santini is a delightful acquaintance ;
his library of old Italian music is most complete,
and he gives or lends me anything and everything.'
Then he tells how Santini is trying to get Bach's
compositions performed at Naples, and goes on
(Nov. 1 6), 'Old Santini continues to be courtesy
personified ; if some evening in company I praise
anything, or say I do not know such and such a
piece, the very next morning he comes knocking
gently at my door with the identical piece
folded up in his blue handkerchief. Then I go
to him in the evenings, and we are really fond
of each other.' In the well-known letter to
Zelter, Mendelssohn says, 'He is anxious to make
other German music known here, and is at this
moment translating your motet, 'Der Mensch
lebet,' and Bach's 'Singet demHerrn,' into Latin,
and 'Judas Maccabeus' into Italian. He is kind
ness itself, and a very charming old gentleman.
. . . Just now his whole mind is absorbed in
plans for making German music known in Italy.'
Santini even composed pieces in five, six, and
eight real parts, much praised by Fetis. The
Singakademie of Berlin elected him an honorary
member. On the death of his sister he sold his
valuable collection, stipulating however for the
use of it for life. He is no longer living, but the
date of his death is not known. His library is in
the episcopal palace at Minister in Westphalia.
A pamphlet, ' L'Abbe" Santini et sa collection
musicale a Rome' (Florence, 1854), giying a
useful resume of its contents, was published
by a Russian amateur named Wladimir Stas-
soff. [F.G.]
SANTLEY, CHAKLES, born at Liverpool, Feb.
28, 1834, *s the possessor of a baritone voice of
fine quality, extensive compass, and great power.
He quitted England for Italy, Oct. 1855, and
studied at Milan under Gaetano Nava ; returned
Oct. 1857, and took lessons from Manuel Garcia.
He appeared at St. Martin's Hall as Adam in
Haydn's 'Creation,' Nov. 16, 1857, an(l on Jan.
i His address is there given Roma, Via Vittoria, No. 49, while in
the Fe'tis collection it is Via dell* anima, Xo. 50.
SARABAND.
8, 1858, sang the two parts of Raphael and Adam
in the same work at the Sacred Harmonic
Society. He first appeared on the English stage
at Covent Garden, in the Pyne and Harrison
company, as Hoel in ' Dinorah,' in Sept. 1859;
and sang in ' Zampa,' ' The Waterman,' and
' Peter the Shipwright,' at the Gaiety in 1870.
His first essay in Italian opera was at Covent
Garden in 1862, but later in the same season he
transferred his services to Her Majesty's Theatre.
He first sang at the Meetings of the Three
Choirs at Worcester in 1863, at Birmingham
Festival in 1864, and at the Handel Festival at
the Crystal Palace in 1862, and has since main
tained his position as the first English singer of
his class, and during a tour in the United States
in 1871 reaped substantial honours there also.
Mr. Santley's accomplishments are not confined
to music. He has adapted ' Joconde ' to the
English stage, and is an enthusiastic amateur
painter. On April 9, 1859, he married Miss
Gertrude KEMBLE, daughter of John Mitchell
Kemble, the eminent Anglo-Saxon scholar, and
granddaughter of Charles Kemble. She ap
peared as a soprano singer at St. Martin's Hall
in the ' Messiah,' in Dec. 1857, but on her mar
riage retired from public life. [W.H.H.]
SAPHO. Opera in 3 acts ; words by Emile Au-
gier, music by Gounod. Produced at the Ope"ra,
April 1 6, 1 8 5 1 . It was reduced to 2 acts and repro
duced July 26, 1858. In Italian, as 'Saffo,'at
Covent Garden, Aug. 9, 1851. [G.]
SARABAND, a stately dance once very
popular in Spain, France and England. Its
origin and derivation have given rise to many
surmises. Fuertes ('Historia de la Musica
Espaiiola,' Madrid, 1859) savs that *ne ^ance
was invented in the middle of the i6th century
by a dancer called Zarabanda, who, according to
other authorities was a native of either Seville
or Guayaquil, and after whom it was named.
Others connect it with the Spanish Sarao (an
entertainment of dancing), and Sir William
Ouseley (Oriental Collections, 1728, vol. ii.
p. 197, misquoted by Mendel, under 'Saraband'),
in a note to a Turkish air called ' Ser-i-Kha"neh,'
or 'the top of the house,' has the following:—
'Some tunes are divided into three parts and
are marked Kkdne-i tfdni " the second part " and
Khdne-i Mlitf " the third part "; near the con
clusion of several we also find the Persian words
ser-band, from which, without doubt, our sara
band has been derived.'2
Whatever its origin may have been, it is
found in Europe at the beginning of the i6th
century, performed in such a manner as to render
its oriental source highly probable. This may
be gathered from the following extract from
Chapter xii. ' Del baile y cantar llamado Zara
banda/ of the 'Tratado contra los Juegos Pub-
licos' ('Treatise against Public Amusements')
of Mariana (1536-1623) : 'Entre las otras in-
venciones ha salido estos anos un baile y cantar
tan lacivo en las palabras, tan feo en las meneos,
2 In a MS. collection of dances in the Music School at Oxford is a
Saraband by Coleman, entitled ' Seribran.'
SAKABAND.
que basta para pegar fuego aun a" las personas
muy honestas' (' amongst other inventions there
has appeared during late years a dance and song,
so lascivious in its words, so ugly in its move
ments, that it is enough to inflame even very
modest people'). This reputation was not con
fined to Spain, for Marini in his poem 'L'Adone'
(1623) says :
Chiama qnesto sno gioco empio e profano
Saravanda, e Ciaccona, il nuova Ispano.1
Padre Mariana, who believed in its Spanish
origin, says that its invention was one of the
disgraces of the nation, and other authors attri
bute its invention directly to the devil. The dance
was attacked by Cervantes and Guevara, and
defended by Lope de Vega, but it seems to have
been so bad that at the end of the reign of Philip
II. it was for a time suppressed. It was soon
however revived in a purer form, and was in
troduced at the French court in 1588, where
Richelieu, wearing green velvet knee-breeches,
with bells on his feet, and castanets in his hands,
danced it in a ballet before Anne of Austria.
In England the Saraband was soon trans
formed into an ordinary country -dance. The
first edition of Playford's 'Dancing Master'
(1651) has two examples, one, to be danced
'longwayes for as many as will' (i.e. as 'Sir
Roger de Coverley ' is now danced), and the other,
' Adson's Saraband,' to be danced ' longwayes
for six.' It was at about this time that the
Saraband, together with other dances, found its
way into the Suite, of which it formed the slow
movement, placed before the concluding Gigue.
In this form it is remarkable for its strongly
accentuated and majestic rhythm, generally as
follows : —
SARASATE.
227
It is written either in the major or the minor
key, in 3-2 or 3-4 time, although Walther
(Lexicon, 1732) says that it may be also written
in 2-4 time. It usually consists of two 8- or 12-
bar divisions, begins on the down-beat, and
ends on the second or third beat. Bach, in the
' Clavieriibung ' Pt. I. (Bachges. iii. 76) has a
Saraband beginning on the up-beat, and Handel
(Suite XI) has one with variations. Those by
Corelli do not conform to the established rules,
but are little more than Sicilianas played slowly.
The following Saraband for the guitar is printed
in Fuertes' ' Historia de la Musica Espanola.'
=te
J4-
^4=^
T^
^T*
^
^
^^~
-*U
-< — !
^r
f*^
t-^w
™
W\
^
^
fef3
fc^t
^
-^ 1
^ r
3=*±i
™
f
Vi
^r -
;
rLf
3 1
l 'New Spain ' is Castile.
r
Handel's noble air 'Lascia ch'io pianga,' in
' Rinaldo,' is taken with no material alteration
from a Saraband in his earlier opera of ' Almira,'
in which the majestic rhythm mentioned reigns in
all its dignity : —
XI ft fl ] 1" _i
~*-i ^— f«" i
1 frf' r" j
1 M
(f\)¥ -£• ^ ^ •-
<& j& i g-
r
^J ^v
• •
0-j 1 1 1 j.
(TS
p
* n ' r UL
r^
— '
1 1 —
- \ 1 '
1
C3I2Z • J
", 1 ~,
c^ -^J
See Chrysander's
Handel i. 121.
[W.B.S.]
SARASATE, MARTIN MELiTON,born at Pam-
peluna, March 10, 1844, came to France as a
child, and entered the Paris Conservatoire, Jan. i,
1856. The following year he became the favourite
pupil of Alard, and gained the first prizes for
solfeggio and violin. He then entered Reber's
harmony class, and secured a premier accessit
in 1859, but shortly after relinquished the study
of composition for the more tempting career of
a concert player. His beautiful tone, retentive
memory, immense execution, and certainty of
finger, added to the singularity of his manners
and appearance, ensured his success in Paris, the
French provinces, and the Peninsula. The Span
iards naturally honoured an artist whom they
looked upon as their own countryman, but
Sarasate aspired to make his name known wher
ever music was appreciated, as well as in the two
countries especially his own by birth and adoption.
No violinist has travelled more than he ; besides
making his way through Europe, from the re
motest corner of Portugal to Norway, and from
London to Moscow, he has visited America,
North and South. In all his wanderings he has
contrived to carry on his cultivation, and de-
velope his great natural gifts. To London his
first visit was in 1874, when he played at
the Philharmonic Concert, May 1 8, and at the
Musical Union, June 9, etc. He returned in 1877
(Crystal Palace, Oct. 13), and 78 (Philharmonic,
Mar. 28), since when he has not crossed the
channel.
Sarasate's distinguishing characteristics are not
so much fire, force, and passion, though of these
he has an ample store, as purity of style, charm,
flexibility, and extraordinary facility. He sings
on his instrument with taste and expression, and
without that exaggeration or affectation of sen
timent which disfigures the playing of many
violinists. He is not, however, quite free from a
Q2
228
SARASATE.
tendency to trick, such as tremolo, which is very
regrettable in an artist of genius and sensibility,
—and from over-rapidity in quick movements.
His repertoire is varied, comprising the concertos
of the classical masters — Viotti, Beethoven, Spohr,
and Mendelssohn — and the works of the modern
French and Belgian schools. Among the latter
his favourites are Max Bruch's concertos, those of
Saint-Saens and Lalo, and the Symphonic Espag-
nole of the last-named composer. Sarasate has
composed for his instrument romances, fantaisies,
and especially transcriptions of Spanish airs and
dances (Simrock, Bonn), all calculated to display
his skill as a virtuoso. [G.C.]
SARTI, GIUSEPPE, born at Faenza, Dec. I,
1729, a date differing from that given by most
of his biographers, but furnished by Sarti's own
grandson to the writer, who has taken great
pains to verify it. The son of a jeweller who
played the violin in the cathedral, he early
learned music, and had lessons in composition
— from Vallotti according to his own family,
from Padre Martini according to his biographers.
Whether at Padua or at Bologna (the respective
homes of the two masters), he completed his
studies at an early age, for we learn from the
chapter archives, still preserved in the library
of Faenza, that he was organist of the cathedral
from 1748 to April 1750. In 1751 he composed
his first opera, 'Pompeo in Armenia,' which was
enthusiastically received by his fellow towns
men, and followed by several more serious
works, and ' II Re pastore' (Venice, 1753) which
had an immense success. So quickly did his
fame spread that when he was only 24 the
King of Denmark (Frederic V.) invited him
to Copenhagen as Capellmeister to the Prince
Royal, and director of the Italian opera; and,
on the closing of the latter in two years, made
him Court-capellmeister. In the summer of 1765
the king determined to reopen the opera, and
Sarti went back to Italy after an absence of
twelve years to engage singers ; but his plans
were upset by the deaths first of the king in
1766, and then of his own mother in 1767, so
that it was not till 1768 that he returned to
Copenhagen. These three years of trouble were
not unfruitful, as he composed five operas, of
which two, ' I Contratempi ' and ' Didone abban-
donata,' were given in Venice, where he seems
chiefly to have resided.
Overskou's carefully compiled 'History of the
Danish l stage' informs us that Sarti directed
the Danish court-theatre from 1770 to May 20,
1775, when he was summarily dismissed. A
favourite with Christian VII. , 'and the protege"
of Struensee and Queen Caroline Matilda, he was
too artless and straightforward to curry favour
with the queen dowager and the ambitious
Ove Gulberg ; so after the catastrophe of 1772
he found his position gradually becoming worse
and worse, and when the oligarchical party had
secured the upper hand, imprisoning the queen,
and reducing the king to a mere cipher, he had,
i Thomas Overskou. ' Deti danske Skueplads in dens Historic,' 8vo.
Copenhagen. 1851—.
SARTI.
with other court favourites, to endure much ill
treatment, and was finally banished. During
this second stay at Copenhagen he married
Camilla Pasi, by whom he had two daughters.
Returning to Italy in the summer of 1775 he
went first to Venice, became at once director of
the Ospedaletto Conservatorio, and administered
it with great success for four years. In 1779 the
post of maestro di capella of the cathedral of
Milan fell vacant through the death of Fioroni,
and Sarti was pronounced successful at a compe
tition held before the Conservatorio of Naples.
This victory over Paisiello and other eminent mu
sicians, greatly increased his reputation, and pro
cured him many distinguished pupils, Cherubini
among the number, who indeed was not only his
pupil, but for some years his assistant.2 In 1784
he received an invitation from Russia too ad
vantageous to be refused, but the nine years
spent in Milan were the most brilliant of his
whole career, and the most prolific, including as
they do his most successful operas, ' Le Gelosie
3villane ' and 'Farnace' (Venice, 1776) ; 'Achille
in Sciro' (Florence, Oct. 17/9) ; 'Giulio Sabino'
(Venice 1781), and ' Le Nozze di Dorina' (ib.
1782). To complete the list, at least ten more
operas and several cantatas on a large scale
should be added, works for the cathedral choir,
including several masses, a Miserere k 4, and
some important motets.
On his way to St. Petersburg, Sarti made some
stay at Vienna, where Joseph II. received him
graciously, and granted him the proceeds of a
performance of 'I Litiganti,' which had long
maintained its place at the Burgtheater, and had
helped to fill its coffers, as the monarch politely
told the composer. He there made the ac
quaintance of Mozart, then in the very prime of
life, who speaks of him as an ' honest, good man,'
and who not only played to him a good deal, but
adopted an air from his ' Due litiganti ' as the
theme of a set of Variations (Kochel, 460), and
as a subject in the Second Finale of ' Don Juan.'
His pleasure in Mozart's playing did not, how
ever, place him on Mozart's level ; and when the
famous six quartets were published, Sarti was one
of the loudest to complain of their ' barbarisms.'
His examination remains mostly in MS., but
some extracts are given in the A. M. Z. for 1832
(p. 373), including 19 mortal errors in 36 bars,
and showing how difficult it is even for a very
clever composer to apprehend the ideas of one
greater than himself.
Catherine II. received him with even greater
marks of favour than Joseph, which he repaid
by composing several important works for
her own choir, and by bringing the Italian
opera into a state of efficiency it had never
attained before. Among his sacred compositions
of this period may be mentioned an oratorio for
two choirs, full orchestra, and band of Russian
horns ; a Te Deum for the taking of Otchakow
by Potemkin ; and a Requiem in honour of Louis
2 See Oherubini's preface to the Catalogue of his works.
3 Mozart, in 1791, wrote a final chorus for this, of which, however,
nothing has survived but the 5 bars in his autograph catalogue. (See
KOchel, 615.)
SARTI.
XVI. It was in the Te Deum that Sarti em
ployed fireworks and the discharge of cannon to
heighten the martial effect of the music. Among
his operas produced at St. Petersburg were ' Ar-
mida ' ( 1 786), which had an immense success, and
was sung to perfection by the celebrated Todi —
and 'Olega,' the libretto of which was by the
Empress herself. In this opera Sarti endeavoured
to imitate the music of the ancient Greeks, and
made use of some of their modes. A skilled
mathematician and physicist, he was fond of ex
plaining to the Empress his theories of acoustics,
which he illustrated by many ingenious experi
ments. He invented a machine for counting
the vibrations of sounds, and fixed 436 vibra
tions1 for the A, as the normal pitch for his
orchestra. For this invention he was elected an
honorary member of the Academy of Science in St.
Petersburg. Many other honours were conferred
upon him, including those of councillor of the Uni
versity, chief maitre de chapelle to the court, and
nobility of the ist class. Todi's intrigues caused
him temporary inconvenience, but he consoled
himself for a short period of disgrace by going to a
village in theUkraine,givenhimbyPrincePotem-
kin, and founding there a school of singing which
turned out some remarkable singers. In 1793
the Empress restored him completely to favour,
and placed him at the head of a Conservatoire
planned after the model of those in Italy. After
her death and that of her son Paul I., Sarti de
termined to revisit his native land, and in the
spring of 1802 left Russia, where he had lived for
1 8 years without a break. At Berlin he formed
an intimacy with the Court-capellmeister, Noel
Mussini (born at Bergamo, 1765, died at Flo
rence, 1837), who fell in love with his daughter
Giuliana, and became his son-in-law.2 Imme
diately after the marriage the kind and gentle
Sarti, who was as absent as La Fontaine, fell
seriously ill of gout, and died July 28, 1802, aged
73- He was buried in the Catholic church of
St. Edwige, where his ashes still remain.
From some unexplained cause very few of
Sarti's compositions have been engraved. His
Te Deuni was printed with Russian words at
St. Petersburg, and Breitkopf & Hartel have
published two of his sacred pieces, one in 8, the
other in 6 real parts. A French translation of
the 'Nozze di Dorina' — apparently the only
opera of his that has been engraved — appeared
in Paris, but Ricordi of Milan has copies of ' Ar-
micla e Rinaldo'; 'I finti Eredi'; ' Le Gelosie
villane'; ' Nitteti,' and ' Vologeso.' These scores,
as well as those of ' Adriano in Sciro,' 'Alessandro,'
'Gli Amanti consolati,' 'Castore e Polluce,' 'I
Contratempi,' 'Didone abbandonata,' 'Erifile,'
'Fra due Litiganti,' ' Giulio Sabino,' ' Idalide,'
'Irigenia,' 'II Medonte,' 'II Militare bizzarre,'
' Mitridate,' ' Le Nozze di Dorina,' and
'Scipione,' and also of nearly all his sacred
' The 'diapason normale' of France at this moment fixes 435
vibrations for the same note.
2 The articles on Sarti and Mussini in F<5tis are full of errors and
omissions. We have corrected the most glaring mistakes from
family papers kindly furnished by the distinguished painter L. Mus
sini, director of the Museo at Siena, and grandson of the composer.
SATURDAY CONCERTS.
229
works, are in the library of the Paris Conserva
toire, from which circumstance the writer is
able to pronounce upon his style. The part-
writing is eminently vocal, and the most difficult
combinations are mastered with ease, but the
scientific element is never unduly forced into
notice, owing to Sarti's gift of fresh and spon
taneous melody. Most of his operas contain
numbers well constructed with a view to stage
effect, and full of expression and charm ; indeed
so much of his music might still be heard with
pleasure that it seems strange that no great
artist has attempted to revive it.
His masses alone retain their hold on public
favour, and one was performed on Easter Day 1 880
in Milan Cathedral, which still has all the MSS.
Sarti left six sonatas for the Clavier solo
(London, 1762). An Allegro from these is in
cluded in Pauer's 'Alte Meister.' Cherubini
quotes a ' Cum Sancto' a 8 of his in his
'Theory of Counterpoint'; and Fe"tis a Kyrie
from the same mass in his treatise. Breitkopf
has published a Fugue for 8 voices, a Hymn and
a Miserere, and the overture to ' Giro ricono-
sciuto.' A Rondo for mezzo soprano will be found
in Gevaert's ' Gloires d' Italic,' and a Cavatina
from 'Giulio Sabino' in the ' Gemme d'Antichita.'
The Mussini family possess a fine oil painting
of the composer, taken in 1786 by Tonci, an
Italian painter settled in St. Petersburg. ' Le
Chevalier Sarti,' a novel by P. Scudo, appeared
first in the ' Revue des Deux Mondes,' and has
since been published separately (Paris, Hachette,
1857). [G.C.]
SARTORETTI, a Mantuan lady who deserves
to be rescued from oblivion for her conduct to
Mozart when he visited Mantua in January
1 770 as a boy of not quite 14. She invited him
to dinner, sent him a dish containing a garland
of choice flowers tied with red ribands, and in the
midst of the ribands a medal worth four ducats,
and a copy of verses by herself headed Al Signor
Amadeo Wolfgango Mozart, Anacreontica. His
hands were at the time severely chapped with
the cold, and she gave him some pomade which
quickly restored them. The verses are printed
by Jahn in his Mozart, App. III. A, 6. [G.]
SARTORIS, MKS., actress, singer, and friend
of Mendelssohn's. She died Aug. 6, 1879. [See
KEMBLE, ADELAIDE.] [W.H.H.]
SATANELLA, OR THE POWER OF LOVE.
A ' New Original Romantic Opera,' in 4 acts ;
words by Harris and Falconer, music by Balfe.
Produced at the National English Opera, Covent
Garden (Pyne and Harrison), Dec. 20,1858. The
story is a version of the Diable boiteux. [G.]
SATURDAY CONCERTS, CRYSTAL
PALACE. For these see vol. i. p. 422 a. They
continue on the same footing as there described ;
and since that date (Oct. 1878) Brahms's Second
Symphony, Academic and Tragic Overtures,
and Violin Concerto ; Raff's ' Im Walde,' ' Fruh-
lingsklange,' and ' Im Sommer,' Symphonies ;
Liszt's ' Ideale ' ; Rubinstein's ' Tower of Babel,'
230
SATURDAY CONCERTS.
' Dramatic ' Symphony, and PF. Concerto in G ;
Goetz's Symphony, PF. Concerto, Overtures ;
Bandini's ' Eleonore ' ; Smetana's ' Vltava ' ; Bi
zet's ' Roma ' ; Sullivan's ' Martyr of Antioch ' ;
Cowen's Scandinavian Symphony ; Schubert's 8
Symphonies in chronological order, and many other
new works have been brought forward. [G.]
SATURDAY POPULAR CONCERTS, THE,
the enterprise of the Messrs. Chappell, and held
in St. James's Hall, London, at 3 on Saturday
afternoons in winter and spring, are an offshoot
of the MONDAY POPULAR CONCERTS. They began
in 1865, when three performances were given,
on March n, 18, 25. This practice continued,
with a gradual increase in the number, and an
occasional extra concert before Christmas, till
1876-7, when the number was raised to seven
teen, given between Nov. n and March 24 in
clusive, in fact alternating with the Monday
Popular Concerts through the season. In pro
grammes and performances the two sets of con
certs are alike. [G.]
SAUER & LEIDESDORF, a formerly-
existing firm of music-publishers in Vienna.
Schubert published the following works with
them, beginning in 1823 : — op. 20-30 (including
the ' Schb'ne Mullerin' in 5 parts) ; 35, 40, 59, 69
(the overture only, for PF. 4 hands, as op. 52).
Sauer then retired, and Leidesdorf continued the
business alone, publishing for Schubert op. 92,
94, 108 ; and after his death 119 (Oct. 1829).
Leidesdorf was a prolific writer of PF. pieces,
much esteemed by amateurs. After the last-
mentioned date he went to Florence, and died there
Sept. 26, I84O.1 His relations to Beethoven are
mentioned under LEIDESDORF. [C.F.P.]
SAUL. An oratorio ; -words attributed both
to Jennens and Morell, music by Handel. The
composition was begun July 23, 1738. The 2nd
act was completed Aug. 28, and the whole on
Sept. 27, of the same year. First performance at
the King's Theatre, Tuesday, Jan. 16, i739>
at Dublin, May 25, 1742. Revived by the
Sacred Harmonic Society, March 20, 1840. The
autograph is in the library at Buckingham
Palace. The overture ('Sinfonia') is Handel's
longest ; it is in 4 movements, and the organ is
largely employed in it as a solo instrument.
There seems to have been some secret connexion
between the organ and the oratorio, as it is more
than once announced ' with several concertos on
the organ.' The 'Dead March in Saul' (in C
major) has been perhaps more widely played,
and is more universally known than any other
piece of music. [G.]
SAURET, EMILE, violinist, born at Dun le
Roi, Cher, France, May 22, 1852, soon attracted
the notice of De Beriot, and became his pupil,
the last he ever had. He began to travel at an
early age, playing in the chief towns of France
and Italy, in Vienna and in London, where he
made his first appearance at Alfred Mellon's Con
certs, Covent Garden, in Aug. 1866. In 1872
he made his first visit with Strakosch to the ;
I Not 1839. as stated in vol. ii. p. 114 o.
SAUZAY.
United States, and his second in 1874, remain
ing there till Jan. 1876. In New York he
made the acquaintance of von Billow and Rubin
stein, and on his return to Leipzig was welcomed
by the latter, then engaged in the rehearsals of
his 'Paradise Lost.' Sauret made his ddbutia.
the Gewandhaus in May 1876 in Mendelssohn's
Concerto, and was most warmly received. He
however returned immediately to America, and
it was not till he came back again in 1877, and
went through Germany and Austria in two long
and most successful tournees, that his reputation
was established in his native country. He has
played at the Gewandhaus every year since 1876,
and is a great and desired favourite with that
very critical audience. In Holland also he is well
known. In England he reappeared in 1880, and
played at the Crystal Palace, April 24, and Phil
harmonic (Bruch's Concerto No. i) on the 28th.
Liszt has shown him much kindness, and they
have often made music together. In 1879
Sauret married Miss Emma Hotter of Dusseldorf^
and since that date has taken up his abode in
Berlin, where he is teacher of the violin in
Kullak's Academy.
His published works embrace a Concerto in
G minor ; a Ballade, a Legende ; and a Serenade
in G — all for solo violin and orchestra ; Caprice
de Concert in D ; Scherzo fantastique ; Valse-
caprice; Barcarolle-mazurka, and many other
drawing-room pieces, as well as transcriptions
from Mendelssohn, Rubinstein, Wagner, etc. [G.]
SAUZAY, CHARLES EUGENE, an eminent
French violinist, was born at Paris, July 14,
1809. In J823 he entered the Conservatoire,
and in his second year became the pupil of
Baillot and of Reicha. He obtained the 2nd
violin prize in 1825, the ist do., and the second
for fugue, in 1827. A few years later he joined
Baillot's quartet, first as second violin and then
as tenor, vice Urban, married Mile. Baillot, and
continued one of her father's party till its dis
solution in 1 840. He soon rose rapidly both in
society and as a professor. In 1840 he was
made first violin to Louis Philippe, and after
wards leader of the second violins to the Em
peror Napoleon III. In 1860 he succeeded
Girard as professor at the Conservatoire. His
own quartet party started after the termination
of Baillot's, embracing his wife and Boely
as pianists, Norblin and Franchomme ; gave its
concerts, sometimes with and sometimes without
orchestra, in the Salle Pleyel. Sauzay is men
tioned by Hiller as one of Mendelssohn's ac
quaintances during his stay in Paris in 1830.
He was greatly sought after both as a player and
a teacher. His publications are not important,
and consist of incidental music to ' Georges Dan-
din ' and ' Le Sicilien,' cleverly written in the
style of Lully to suit the date of the pieces;
fan-tasias and romances; a PF. trio; songs;
' Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven ; Etude sur le qua-
tuox ' (Paris 1861), a disappointing work from the
pen of a musician of so much eminence and
experience ; ' L'e'cole de raccompagnement '
(Paris 1869), a sequel to the foregoing. He
SAUZAY.
has now in the press a series of ' Etudes harmon-
iques ' for the violin. [G.]
SAVART, FELIX, a French philosopher, who
distinguished himself by researches in acoustics.
He was born at Me'zieres June 30, 1791, and
was the, son of a mathematical instrument maker
of some repute. He at first practised medicine,
but subsequently devoted himself in preference
to general philosophical pursuits, obtained the
post of professor at the College of France, and
was admitted a member of the French Academy
of Sciences in November 1827.
Following in the steps of Chladni, whose
labours had particularly attracted his attention,
he made many investigations in acoustics, which
are recorded in the several publications bearing
his name. He appears particularly to have
thrown light on the nature of that complicated
relation between a vibrating body which is the
source of sound, and other bodies brought into
connexion with it, by virtue of which the original
sound is magnified in intensity and modified in
quality; well-known examples of such an arrange
ment being furnished by the soundboards of the
violin tribe and the pianoforte.
Savart's name is also connected with an in
genious little device for measuring, in a manner
easily appreciable by a lecture-audience, the
number of vibrations corresponding to a given
musical note. A wheel, caused to rotate quickly
by ordinary mechanical contrivances, is furnished
on its circumference with teeth or ratchets,
against which a tongue of pasteboard or some
other elastic substance is brought into contact.
The passage of each tooth gives a vibration to
the tongue, and if the wheel revolve fast enough,
the repetition of these vibrations will produce a
musical sound. Hence, as the number of rotations
of the wheel in a given time can be easily counted,
the number of vibrations corresponding to the
note produced can be experimentally ascertained,
with tolerable precision. This mode of deter
mining vibration numbers has been since super
seded by the more elegant instrument, the SYREN,
and by other modes known to modern acoustic
physicists, but from the simplicity of its demon
strations it is still often used.
Savart also investigated with some attention
and success the acoustical laws bearing on wind
instruments, and on the production of the voice.
He died in March 1841. [W.P.]
SAVILE, JEREMY, a composer of the middle
of the 1 7th century, some of whose songs are in
cluded in ' Select Musicall Ayres and Dialogues,'
1653, is now only known by his 4-part song,
' The Waits,' printed in Play ford's ' Musical
Companion,' which, by long-standing custom is
the last piece sung at the meetings of the Madri
gal Society and similar bodies. [W. H.H.]
SAVOY. [See OLD HUNDREDTH, THE.]
SAVOY CHAPEL ROYAL. At the present
day commonly accepted as one of Her Majesty's
Chapels Royal, the Savoy has a constitution
differing widely from the chapels of St. James
and Whitehall. While these are maintained out
SAX.
231
of the Civil List, the Savoy Chapel derives its
sustenance from Her Majesty's Privy Purse, and
thus in one respect has even greater claim to
the appellation of Royal. The salient points in
the history of the Savoy may be given in few
words, which may tend to remove much pre
vailing misconception on the subject. In 1246
Henry III. made a grant of land on the banks of
the Thames to his wife's uncle, Count Peter of
Savoy, and a palatial residence was erected on the
site. After Peter's death the estate came into
the possession of Queen Eleanor, who bestowed
it upon her son Edmund of Lancaster, and it
remained in the possession of the Lancastrian
branch of the royal family until 1381, when,
owing to the unpopularity of John of Gaunt, the
palace was wrecked by th-e insurgents under
Wat Tyler. Under the provisions of the will of
Henry VII., a hospital was founded there, but
though richly endowed, it did not flourish, and
the foulest abuses prevailed until 1702, when the
institution was dissolved. The Chapel had been
used from 1564 until 1717 by the parishioners
of St. Mary's, but in 1773 George III. issued a
patent constituting it a Chapel Royal, and its
title is therefore beyond dispute. From time
to time the reigning sovereigns contributed to
wards its maintenance, but the place attracted
little general notice until 1864, when it was
partially destroyed by fire. Restored from de
signs by Sir Sidney Smirke, at a cost to Her
Majesty of about £7000, the Chapel was reopened
for Divine Service on December 3, 1865. The
peculiarity of the Services, as at present con
ducted, calls for some mention in this place.
In the absence of any provision for the full
choral rendering of the ritual, congregational
singing is promoted to the fullest extent. The
choir consists of boys only, and the psalms, can
ticles, hymns, etc., are sung strictly in unison.
The chants and tunes are selected from every
available source, the most worthy examples of
the older school being utilised equally with
modern compositions of sufficient melodic beauty
to appeal to the vocal capabilities of a mixed
congregation. The various Church Offices of Bap
tism, Confirmation, Matrimony, Burial of the
Dead, etc., are never rendered at the Savoy with
out the musical additions suggested by the rubrics,
and strangers to the Chapel who seek its minis
trations are frequently surprised at the aid thus
spontaneously given. The organ, at present in
complete, is by Willis. [H.F.F.]
SAX, CHARLES JOSEPH, a Belgian musical-
instrument maker of the first rank, born at Dinant
in Belgium, Feb. i, 1791, died in Paris, April 26,
1865. He was first a cabinet-maker, then a me
chanic in a spinning-machine factory, and then
set up in Brussels as a maker of wind-instruments.
He had served no apprenticeship to the trade, and
his only qualification was that he could play the
serpent ; he was therefore obliged to investi
gate for himself the laws concerning the bore of
instruments ; but as he had great manual dex
terity, and a turn for invention, he was soon able
to produce serpents and flutes of fair quality. He
232
SAX.
quickly attracted notice by his clarinets and bas
soons, which gained him a medal at the Industrial
Exhibition of 1820, and the title of musical-
instrument maker to the court of the Nether
lands, who also encouraged him by advancing
him capital. In 1822 he began to make all
kinds of wind-instruments, brass and wood, and
in 1824 invented an 'omnitonic horn' which he
continued to perfect till 1 846. This instrument
can be adjusted to any key by means of a
piston sliding backwards or forwards on a gra
duated scale of about half an inch long, which
sets the body of the instrument in communication
with tubes of different lengths corresponding to
all the major keys. On a separate elbow is a
moveable register which the player fixes opposite
the number of the key he wishes to use, and the
tube of that key being at once brought into
position, the instrument is played exactly like
an ordinary horn. Sax also invented brass
instruments producing every note in the scale,
without crooks, pistons, or cylinders. He took
out patents for a keyed harp, and a piano and a
guitar on a new system, but his efforts were
mainly directed to perfecting the clarinet, especi
ally the bass clarinet, and discovering new methods
of boring brass and wood wind-instruments with
a view to make them more exactly in tune. His
exertions were crowned with success, and he
obtained gratifying distinctions at the Brussels
Industrial Exhibition of 1835.
Charles Sax was the father of II children, of
whom two sons were distinguished in the same
line. The eldest of these,
ANTOINE JOSEPH, known as ADOLPHE SAX,
born at Dinanfc Nov. 6, 1814, was brought up in
his father's workshop, and as a child was remark
able for manual skill, and love of music. He
entered the Brussels Conservatoire and studied
the flute and clarinet, — the latter with Bender,
who considered him one of his best pupils. Like
his father his efforts were directed mainly to the
improvement of that instrument, especially the
bass clarinet, and he even designed a double-bass
clarinet in Bb. In the course of his endeavours
to improve the tune of his favourite instrument
he invented an entire family of brass instruments
with a new quality of tone, which he called Sax
ophones. The hope of making both fame and
money led him to Paris; he arrived in 1842,
and established himself in the Rue St. Georges,
in small premises which he was afterwards
forced to enlarge. He had no capital beyond his
brains and fingers, which he used both as a man
ufacturer and an artist ; but he had the active
support of Berlioz, HaleVy, and G. Kastner, and
this soon procured him money, tools and workmen.
He exhibited in the French Exhibition of 1844,
and obtained a silver medal for his brass and wood
wind-instruments, a great stimulus to a man who
looked down upon all his rivals, and aimed not
only at eclipsing them, but at securing the mono
poly of furnishing musical instruments to the
French army. In 1845 he took out a patent for
the Saxhorn, a new kind of bugle, and for a
family of cylinder instruments called Saxo-
SAX.
trombas, intermediate between the Saxhorn and
the cylinder trumpet. On June 22, 1846, he re
gistered the Saxophone, which has remained his
most important discovery. A man of such inven
tive power naturally excited much jealousy and
ill-feeling among those whose business suffered
from his discoveries, but his tact and wisdom
made numerous and powerful friends, among
others General de Rumigny, Aide-de-camp to
Louis Philippe, and a host of newspaper writers
who were perpetually trumpeting his praises.
He lost no opportunity of vaunting the supe
riority of his instruments over those in use in
the French military bands, at a special com
petition held between the two ; and the supe
riority, whether deserved or nob, soon resulted
in a monopoly, the first effect of which was to
banish from the military bands all horns, oboes,
and bassoons. Hence, outside the Conservatoire,
there is no longer a supply of skilled performers
on those classical and indispensable instruments,
on which the various French orchestras may draw.
The Paris Industrial Exhibition of 1849, at
which Sax obtained a gold medal, brought his
three families of instruments still more into notice ;
and he received the Council Medal at the Great
Exhibition of 1851. In spite of these merited
honours, he became bankrupt in 1852. He soon,
however, made an arrangement with his creditors,
and on re-commmencing business entered for the
Paris Exhibition of 1855, and gained another
gold medal. When the pitch was reformed in
1859 every orchestra and military band in France
had to procure new wind-instruments — an
enormous advantage, by which any one else in
Sax's place would have made a fortune; but with
all his ability and shrewdness he was not a man
of business, and his affairs became more and more
hopelessly involved. There was full scope for his
inventive faculties under the Second-Empire, and
he introduced various improvements into the dif
ferent piston instruments, only one of which need
be specified, viz. the substitution of a single
ascending piston for the group of descending ones.
This principle he adapted to both conical and
cylindrical instruments. He also invented instru
ments with seven bells and six separate pistons;
instruments with rotatory bells for altering the
direction of the sound, and a host of smaller im
provements and experiments, all detailed in Fetis's
' Rapports de 1'Exposition ' and ' Biographie Uni-
verselle.'
At the London International Exhibition of
1862, Sax exhibited cornets, saxhorns, and saxo-
trombas, with 3 pistons, and with 2, 3, 4, and 5
keys; and at Paris in 1867 he took the Grand
Prix for specimens of all the instruments invented
or improved by him. Since then his projects have
been repeatedly before the public, but he has lost
his powerful patrons and declined in prosperity
year after year. He has been obliged to give up
his vast establishment in the Rue St. Georges
(No. 50) and to sell (Dec. 1877) his collection
of musical instruments. The printed catalogue
contains 467 items, and though not absolutely
correct is interesting, especially for the view it
SAX.
SAXOPHONE.
233
gives of the numerous infringements of his patents. '
The typical instruments of the collection were
bought by the Museum of the Paris Conservatoire,
the Muse'e Instrumental of Brussels, and M.Cesar
Snoeck of Renaix, a wealthy Belgian collector.
Among the numerous works written to adver
tise the merits of Adolphe Sax's instruments we
need only mention two — Comettant's ' Histoire
d'un inventeur au XlXme Siecle' (Paris 1860,
552 pp. 8vo. with a fair likeness of Sax) ; and Pon-
te'coulant^s ' Organographie' (Paris 1861, 2 vols.
8vo).
ALPHONSE SAX, JUIL, worked with his brother
for some years, and seems to have devoted his
attention especially to ascending pistons. He set
up for himself in the Hue d'Abbeville (No. 5 bis),
but did not succeed. He published a pamphlet
' Gymnastique des poumons; la Musique instru-
mentale au point de vue de 1'hygiene et la creation
des orchestres f&ninins' (Paris 1865), which is
merely a disguised puff. [G.C.]
SAXHORN (Saxhtba, Saxotromba). The
name given to a family of brass instruments
with valves, invented by the late M. Sax.
' No one can be ignorant/ say the editors of the
Method for Saxhorn and Saxo-tromba, ' of the de
plorable state in which brass instruments were
when M. Sax's method made its appearance. No
^,oherence, no unity between the individual mem
bers of the group ; in one case keys, in another
valves ; a small compass, an imperfect scale, lack
of accurate intonation throughout, bad quality of
tone, variations of fingering requiring fresh study
in passing from one instrument to another. The
keyed bugle, built on false proportions, offered
no prospect of improvement ; the mechanism of
the valves themselves, by their abrupt angles, de
teriorated the quality of tone ; and the absence
of intermediate instruments caused gaps in the
general scale, and at times false combinations.'
Sax's first advice to players exhibits the power
of his new instruments — that namely of playing
in every key without using ' crooks,' as in the
French-horn and Trumpet. [See HORN.] He
also attacked the problem of true intonation, in
valve instruments, by means of what he terms
a compensator. Besides these improvements he
planned all the tubes and mechanism on a far
sounder acoustical basis than had been attempted
in the fortuitous and disconnected contrivances of
former periods. The valve or piston was indeed
known, but was open to the objection stated
above, and was at best but a clumsy machine.
He unquestionably simplified it by causing fewer
turns and corners to interfere with the free
course of the vibrating column of air. It is to
be noted, however, that all the instruments of
the Sax family, like the ordinary cornet-a-pistons,
•utilise the harmonic octave below that in which
the trumpet and French horn speak, and thus
obtain power and facility somewhat at the ex
pense of quality.
Six or even more instruments of different size
compose the Sax family, the chief of these being
the soprano in F, Eb, or D, the contralto in C
and Bb, the tenor in F and Eb, the barytone in
C and Bb, the bass in F and Eb, and the contra
bass, or circular bass, in Bb. Several of these are
known under special nam es ; the tenor for instance
as the Althorn ; the smaller bored Barytone under
that appellation ; the larger bored of similar pitch
as the Euphonium ; the bass or double bass as the
Bombardon or Contra Bombardon.
There can be no doubt that the inventor of the
Saxhorn added greatly to the compass, richness,
and flexibility of the military brass and reed
bands. But it is a question whether the tone of
these powerful auxiliaries blends so well with the
stringed instruments as that of the trumpet,
French horn, and trombone — and hence their com
parative neglect. The compass of all the Saxhorns
is very large, but especially that of the Euphonium,
amounting, according to Sax's own statement, to
more than five octaves. This is increased by the
numerous keys in which the various members
of the family are originally made, reaching from
to
These instruments are furnished with 3, 4, or
even 5 valves, as already described. [See EUPHO
NIUM ; PISTON.]
It has been already said that their chief use is
in military music. For the reasons given they are
easy to play on the march, or even on horse-back,
where an oboe or a contrafagotto would be im
possible. But, in the orchestra, only the euphonium
and the bombardon in Eb, much patronised by
Wagner in his pompous marches, and other parade
music, have held their ground.
[W.H.S.]
SAXOPHONE. Another instrument invented
by Sax, It consists essentially of a conical brass
tube furnished with twenty lateral orifices covered
by keys, and with six studs or finger-plates for the
first three fingers of either hand, and is played by
means of a mouthpiece and single reed of the
clarinet kind.
Like the Saxhorns, it is made in a number of
sizes, representing in all seven different keys ;
namely, the sopranino in C and Bb ; the soprano
in F and Eb ; the mezzo soprano in C and Bb ;
the contralto in F and Eb ; the barytone in C
and Eb ; the bass in F and Eb, and the double
bass or bourdon in C and Bb. The last of these
can be played with a double-bassoon reed.
Those most used are the contralto and bary
tone varieties. In French military bands, how
ever, five or more are in use ; having to a great
degree superseded the more difficult but more
flexible clarinet, and having quite replaced the
bassoon.
The compass of the five highest Saxophones is
the same, viz. from
to
with all the chromatic intervals. The bass and
double bass ones descend to the C below the bass
234
SAXOPHONE.
stave, and reach upwards to the same F as the
rest of the family. In the former case the scale
is of 19 notes, in the latter of 18, or of 31 or 30
semitones in all. The fingering adopted is the
same for all, being that somewhat erroneously
named after Boehm. [See FLUTE ; CLARINET.]
The Saxophone, though inferior in compass,
quality, and power of articulation to the clarinet,
and bassethorn, and especially to the bassoon, has
great value in military combinations. It repro
duces on a magnified scale something of the
violoncello quality, and gives great sustaining
power to the full chorus of brass instruments, by
introducing a mass of harmonic overtones very
wanting in Sax's other contrivance. In the
orchestra, except to replace the bass clarinet, it
is all but unknown. [W.H.S.]
SAYNETE. A Spanish term for a little
comic intermezzo for the theatre. Littr^ con
nects the word with sain or sain-doux, fat ; in
which case it answers to the vulgar English ex
pression ' a bit of fat,' meaning something extra
enjoyable. [G-.]
SCALA, LA. The proprietors of the Ducal
Theatre of Milan, which was burnt in 1776,
obtained, by a decree of July 15, 1776, from
the Empress Maria Theresa of Austria, leave to
build a new opera-house on the site of the
church of S. Maria della Scala. The celebrated
architect, Piermarini of Foligno, made the de
signs, and it was inaugurated Aug. 3, 1778.
The building was not only the grandest theatre
then existing in Europe, but the most artis
tically beautiful and complete. Levati and
Beina painted the ceiling, the boxes, and the
great hall, or ridotto; and the curtain, repre
senting Parnassus, was the work of Riccardi.
The cost of the whole amounted to one million
lire (£40,000), an enormous sum for that time.
Until 1857 the principal entrance of La Scala was
from a bye-street, but since that date it opens
on to a large and beautiful piazza, or square.
The interior of the house is in the horseshoe
form, with five tiers of boxes and a gallery
above them, all in white, relieved by gilded
ornaments. The lowest three tiers have each
36 boxes, and a royal box above the entrance to
the stalls. The fourth and fifth tiers have each
39 boxes, and there are four on each side of the
proscenium, making a total of 194 boxes, be
sides the large royal box and the gallery, each
box having a private room at its back for the
convenience of its occupants.
The length of the whole building is 330 ft.,
and its width 122 ft. The height from the floor
to the ceiling is 65 ft. The stage, with the
proscenium, is 145 ft. long and 54 wide between
the columns of the proscenium, but is 98 ft.
wide further behind. The ridotto, a large
hall for promenading between the acts, is 82 ft.
long and 30 ft. wide. The house holds 620
stalls, and in place of a pit there is standing-
room for 600 persons. The boxes can accommo
date 1900 spectators, and the gallery 500 more;
so that the total capacity of the house for opera
tic representations is 3,600. But the same
SCALA, LA.
theatre, when changed into a ball-room, can
contain more than 7000 persons. This immense
institution permanently employs 922 persons on
its staff, distributed in the following way: —
Artist-singers, 20; orchestra, 100; band, 28;
choristers, no; 'comparse,' 120; ballet, 140;
dressmakers and tailors, 150; doctors, 6; ser
vants, 36, etc.
The gentlemen who provided the funds for
the building of La Scala enjoy the use of its
boxes at a nominal rental whenever the theatre
is open, each box having its owner. In all other
respects the theatre has been the property of
the town of Milan since 1872. The municipality
grants to its lessee an annual sum of £9,800,
and the owners of the boxes pay £2,920 ; and
thus La Scala enjoys an endowment of £12,720
a year. The theatre is controlled by a Com
mission elected by the Common Council of Milan
and the owners of its boxes.
Annexed to the theatre is a celebrated dancing
school, with 60 pupils, where the most famous
ballet-dancers have been trained, and a singing
school for about 50 choristers. Two charitable
institutions — / Filar monici, founded by Mar-
chesi in 1783, and the Teatrale, by Modrone in
1829 — are also dependent for their income upon
the greatest theatre of Italy.
The theatre has undergone no fundamental
change since its erection, except occasional ne
cessary restorations, the latest of which took
place in 1878, when it was regilt throughout,
statutes erected to Rossini and Donizetti, etc.
If La Scala boasts of being -the largest and
most beautiful theatre of Jtaly, it has also the
honour of having produced on its stage the largest
number of new and successful operas and of great
singers. We shall only mention here the most
successful operas and ballets which, being written
expressly for that stage, were first performed
there ; remembering that as the theatre has been
open every year for 103 years, many other operas
were given with varying success.
Tear.
Title of Work.
Composer.
1778
Europa riconosciuta
Salieri.
1787
11 Vecchio geloso
Alessandri.
1784
I due supposti Coirti
Cimarosa.
1787
Ifigenia in Aulide
Zingarelli.
1791
Le Morte di Cesare
Do.
1792
Pirro, Re di Epiro
Do.
11 Mercato di Moufregoso
Do.
1793
La Secchia rapita
Do.
1794
Artaserse
Do.
1796
Giulietta e Romeo
Do.
1801
Baccanali di Roma
NicolinL
1807
Adelasia ed Abramo
Mayr.
1808
11 rivale di se stesso
"Weigl.
1812
La vedova stravagante
General!.
La Pietra del Paragone
Rossini.
1814
Aureliano in Palmira
Do.
11 Turco in Italia
Do.
1817
La Gazza ladra
Do.
1820
Margherita d'Anjou
Meyerbeer.
1821
Elisa e Claudio
Mercadante.
1823
La Vestale
Pacini.
1827
Gli Arabi nelle Gallie
Do.
11 Pirata
Bellini.
1829
La Straniera
Do.
1831
Chiara di Kosemberg
Ricci.
1832
Norma
Bellini.
1834
Lucrezia Borgia
Donizetti.
f f
Un Awentura di Scaramuccia
Ricci.
1835
Gemma di Vergy
Donizetti.
1837
11 Giuramente
Mercadante.
1839
11 Bravo
Do.
SCALA, LA.
SCALE.
235
T«ar.
Title of Work.
Composer.
1839
Oberto, Conte di S. Bonifacio
Verdi.
1842
Nabuco
Do.
1843
I Lombard!
Do.
1856
L'Assedio di Leida
Fetrella.
1858
lone
Do.
1868
Mefistofele.
Boito.
1869
Kuy Bias.
Marchetti.
1876
La Gioconda.
FonchieUi.
1880
11 Figliuol prodigo.
Do.
La Scala has always been renowned for its
splendid and gorgeous ballets, amongst which
were most successful —
1778
178T
1797
1807
1809
1812
1820
1833
1845
1854
1856
1865
1864
1867
1881
I Prigionieri di Cipro
I due Avari
II General Colli in Eoma
Enea e Turno
Cesare in. Egitto
Gli Strelitzi
La Conquista di Malacca
Guglielmo Tell
Esmeralda
tfn fallo
Shakespeare
Flik e Flok
Velleda
Sardanapalo
Excelsior.
SalierL
Eiccl.
Lefevre.
Gallet.
Gioia.
Vigano.
S. Taglioni.
Henry.
Pugni.
Giorza.
Do.
Hertel.
Dall 'Argine.
Hertel.
Marenco.
We should unduly prolong this article were
we to mention the names of all the great artists
who have gained their merited applause on the
boards of La Scala. It is sufficient -to state that
few great artists can be found within the last
hundred years who have not deemed it an honour
and a duty to appear on that celebrated stage,
and win the approval of the Milanese public.
Further information may be obtained from the
'Teatro alia Scala 1778-1862,' by Luigi Romani
(Milan, 1862) ; and the 'Reali Teatri di Milano'
by Cambiasi (Ricordi, Milan, 1881).
Besides La Scala, Milan boasts of several other
theatres, where operas are performed either ex
clusively, or at certain seasons of the year,
instead of dramas. These theatres are, La
Canobbiana, II Carcano, Dal Verrae, Santa Re-
degonda, Re Nuovo, and Fossati. At the Filo-
drammatici and San Simone are given amateur
performances of operatic and orchestral music,
to which admission is obtained only by invita
tion. The Milanese Societa del Quartette has
ohtained great reputation for its masterly per
formances of classical music, especially in recent
years. [L.E.]
SCALCHI, SOFIA, was born Nov. 29, 1850, at
Turin ; received instruction in singing from
Augusta Boccabadati, and made her de"but at
Mantua in 1866 as Ulrica in 'Un Ballo in
Maschera.' She afterwards sang at Verona, Bo
logna, Faenza, Nice, etc., and in England for the
first time Sept. 16, 1868, at the Promenade Con
certs, Agricultural Hall, with very great success.
At the Royal Italian Opera, Covent Garden, she
first appeared Nov. 5 of the same year, as Azu-
cena,and after that as Pierrotto (Linda), Urbano,
CJn Caprajo (Dinorah), etc. She is a great
favourite at that theatre, and has remained there
until the present time. Her voice is of fine
quality and of the compass of two octaves and
a half from low F to B in alt, enabling her to
take both the mezzo-soprano and contralto parts.
She is also a fair actress. In Sept. 1875 she
married Signer Lolli, a gentleman of Ferrara.
Among her repertoire may be named Leonora
(Favorita), which she played July 19, 1871, at
Mario's farewell appearance ; EstelleinCampana's
Esmeralda, June 14, 1870; Leonora in Cima-
rosa's ' Le Astuzie feminili,' July 15, 1871 , Meala
in Masses 'Paul et Virginie,' June i, 1878;
Mrs. Page, July 14, 77 ; and Fides, June 24, 78,
on the respective revivals of Nicolai's Lustige
Weiber, and of Le Prophete; also Arsace, Amne-
ris, Maffeo Orsini, Siebel, etc. She has had fre
quent engagements in Italy, St. Petersburg,
Moscow, Vienna, etc. [A.C.]
SCALE (from the Latin Scala, a staircase or
ladder; Fr. Gamme; Ger. Tonleiter, i.e. sound-
ladder ; Ital. Scala). A term denoting the series
of sounds used in musical compositions.
The number of musical sounds producible, all
differing in pitch, is theoretically infinite, and is
practically very large ; so that in a single octave
a sensitive ear may distinguish 50 to 100 different
notes. But if we were to take a number of these
at random, or if we were to slide by a continuous
transition from one sound to another consider
ably distant from it, we should not make what
we call music. In order to do this we must use
only a certain small number of sounds, forming
a determinate series, and differing from each
other by well-defined steps or degrees. Such
a series or succession of sounds is called a scale,
from its analogy with the steps of a ladder.
It is unnecessary here to enter into the aes-
thetical reason for this ; 1 it must suffice to state
that all nations, at all times, who have made
music, have agreed in adopting such a selection,
although they have not always selected the same
series of sounds. As a first step towards the
selection all musical peoples appear to have ap
preciated the intimate natural relation between
sounds which lie at that distance apart called
an octave ; and hence replicates of notes in octaves
are found to form parts of all musical scales. The
differences lie in the intermediate steps, or the
various ways in which the main interval of the
octave has been substituted.
For modern European music, in ascending
from any note to its octave above, we employ,
normally, a series of seven steps of unequal
height, called the diatonic scale, with the power
of interposing, accidentally, certain intermediate
chromatic steps in addition. The diatonic scale
is of Greek origin, having been introduced about
the middle of the sixth century B.C. The main
divisions of the octave were at the intervals called
the fifth and the fourth, and the subdivisions were
formed by means of two smaller divisions called a
tone and a hemitone respectively. The tone was
equal to the distance between the fourth and the
fifth, and the hemitone was equal to a fourth
minus two tones. The octave was made up of five
tones and two hemitones, and the entire Greek
diatonic scale of two octaves, as settled by Pytha
goras, may be accurately represented in modern
notation as follows : —
1 More complete information on the subject generally may be
found in Helmholtz's ' Tonempfindungea,' or in ' The Philosophy of
Music/ by W. Pole (London, 18T79).
236
SCALE.
SCALE.
Tlie Greek Diatonic Scale.
-
o
.
:
]
:
-
-
O
-
a
a
I
c
-
•
:
SO)
c:
S o
A. +a
I
:
Thus the essence of the diatonic scale was that
it consisted of tones, in groups of two and three
alternately, ench group being separated by a
hemitone from the adjoining one ; and, combining
consecutive intervals, any two tones with a
hemitone would form a fourth, any three tones
with a hemitone would form a fifth, and any
complete cycle of five tones with two hemitones,
would form a perfect octave.
Now it is obvious that in this series of notes,
proved to be in use above two thousand years
ago, we have essentially our diatonic scale ; the
series corresponding in fact with the natural or
white keys of our modern organ or pianoforte.
And as this series formed the basis of the
melodies of the Greeks, so it forms the basis of
the tunes of the present day.
Although, however, the general aspect of the
diatonic series of musical sounds remains un
altered, it has been considerably affected in its
mode of application by two modern elements —
namely, Tonality and Harmony.
First, a glance at the Greek scale will show that
there are seven different diatonic ways in which
an octave may be divided; thus, from A to the
A above will exhibit one way, from B to B
another, from C to C a third, and so on — keep
ing to the white keys alone in each case; and all
these various ' forms of the octave ' as they were
called, were understood and used in the Greek
music, and formed different ' modes.' In modern
times we adopt only two — one corresponding
with C to C, which we call the Major mode,
the other corresponding with A to A, which we
call the Minor mode. And in each case we attach
great importance to the notes forming the ex
tremities of the octave series, either of which we
call the Tonic or Keynote. We have, therefore,
in modern music, the two following ' forms of the
octave' in common use. And we may substitute
for the Greek word ' hemitone ' the modern term
' semitone,' which means the same thing.
Intervals of the Diatonic Scale for the Major Mode.
ASM "-*
Key '
note. •
0)
a
i
g
I
-
.
-.
C
-
<D
i
g Key
§ note.
•U
fi
o
Intervals of the Diatonic Scale for the Minor Mode.
Key
note.
-.
-
:
1
E
-
C
I
a
o
<D
g
-*J
1
<U
Key
note.
§ S
£ 5
Although these differ materially from each
other, it will be seen that the original Greek
diatonic form of the series is in each perfectly
preserved. It must be explained that the minor
scale is given, under particular circumstances,
certain accidental variations [see ASCENDING
SCALE], but these are of a chromatic nature;
the normal minor diatonic form is as here
shown. The choice of particular forms of the
octave, and the more prominent character given
to their limiting notes, constitute the important
feature of modern music called Tonality.
Secondly, a certain influence has been exer
cised on the diatonic scale by modern Harmony.
When it became the practice to sound several
notes of the scale simultaneously, it was found
that some of the intervals of the Greek series
did not adapt themselves well to the combina
tion. This was particularly the case with the
interval of the major third, C to E : according
to the Greek system this consisted of two tones,
but the perfect harmonious relation required to
be a little flatter. The correction was effected
in a very simple manner by making a slight
variation in the value of one of the tones, which
necessitated also a slight alteration in the value
of the semitone. Other small errors have been
corrected in a similar way, so as to make the
whole conform to the principle, that every note
of the scale must have, as far as possible, con
cordant harmonious relations to other notes; and
in determining these, the relations to the tonic
or keynote are the more important.
The diatonic series, as thus corrected, is as
follows : —
Major Sia'onic Scale as corrected for Modern Harmony.
C
C
o
1?
a
03
a
o
-*d
-—
:
0
a
§
a
g
•2 S
i
-
o
a
S
i
~
The several intervals, reckoned upwards from
the lower keynote, are —
C to D, Major tone,
„ E, Major third,
„ F, Perfect Fourth,
„ G, Perfect Fifth,
,, A, Major sixth,
„ B, Major seventh,
„ C, Octave.
It has been stated, however, that for modern
European music, we have the power of adding,
to the seven sounds of the diatonic scale, certain
other intermediate chromatic notes. Thus be
tween C and D we may add two notes called
CJf and Db. Between G and A we may add Gjf and
Ab, and so on. In order to determine what the
exact pitch of these notes should be, it is neces
sary to consider that they may be used for two
quite distinct purposes, i.e. either to embellish
melody without change of key, or to introduce
new diatonic scales by modulation. In the
former case the pitch of the chromatic notes is
SCALE.
indeterminate, and depends on the taste of the
performer ; but for the second use it is obvious
that the new note musb be given its correct
harmonic position according to the scale it
belongs to : in fact it loses its chromatic cha
racter, and becomes strictly diatonic. For
example, if an Fjf be introduced, determining
the new diatonic scale of G, it must be a true
major third above D, in the same way that in
the scale of C, B is a major third above G. In
this manner any other chromatic notes may be
located, always adhering to the same general
principle that they must bear concordant har
monic relations to other notes in the diatonic
scale they form part of.
Proceeding in this way we should obtain a
number of chromatic notes forming a considerable
addition to the diatonic scale. For example, in
order to provide for eleven keys, all in common
use, we should get ten chromatic notes in addition
to the seven diatonic ones, making seventeen in
all, within the compass of a single octave. This
multiplication of notes would produce such a
troublesome complication in practical music, that
in order to get rid of it there has been adopted an
ingenious process of compromising, which&iwpliiies
enormoxisly the construction of the scale, par
ticularly in its chromatic parts. In the first
place it is found that the distance between the
diatonic notes E and F, and between B and C is
nearly half that between C and D, or G and A ;
and secondly, it is known that the adjacent
chromatic notes Cjf and Db, GjJ and Ab, etc.,
are not very different from each other. Putting
all these things together, it follows that if
the octave be divided into twelve equal parts,
a set of notes will be produced not much dif
fering in pitch from the true ones, and with
the property of being applicable to all keys
alike. Hence has arisen the modern chro
matic scale, according to what is called equal
temperament, and as represented on the key
board of the ordinary pianoforte. According
to this, the musical scale consists of twelve
semitones, each equal to a twelfth part of an
octave ; two of these are taken for the tone
of the diatonic scale, being a very little less
in value than the original major tone of the
Greek divisions.
This duodecimal division of the octave was
known to the Greeks, but its modern revival,
which dates about the sixteenth century, has
been one of the happiest and most ingenious
simplifications ever known in the history of
music, and has had the effect of advancing the
art to an incalculable extent. Its defect is that
certain harmonic combinations produced by its
notes are slightly imperfect and lose the satis
factory effect produced by harmonies perfectly
in tune. The nature and extent of this defect,
and the means adopted to remedy it will be
more properly explained under the article
TEMPERAMENT, which see. [W.P.]
SCAEAMUCCIA, UN' AVVENTUEA DI.
A comic opera in 3 acts ; libretto by F. Eomani,
music by L. Eicci. Produced at the Scala,
SCARLATTI.
237
Milan, Sept. 6, 1834, with great success. In
French (by Forges), 'Une aventure de Scara-
mouche,' Versailles, June 1842 ; and in Italian,
Theatre des Italiens, Feb. 26, 1846. [G.]
SCAEIA, EMIL, born in 1838 at Gratz,
Styria, studied at the Conservatorium, Vienna,
under Gentiluomo, made his de"but at Pesth as
St. Bris in ' The Huguenots,' and afterwards sang
at Brunn and Frankfort. In 1860 he came to
London for the purpose of further study under
Garcia, where he was heard by Abt, who pro
cured him an engagement in 1862 at Dessau.
He next played at Leipzig, and from 1865 to 72
at Dresden. Among his best parts were Hercules
(Alceste), Sarastro, Leporello, Caspar, Eocco,
Landgrave (Tannhauser), Pogner (Meistersiiiger)
Burgomaster (Czaar und Zimmermann), Dulca
mara, Geronimo (II Matrimonio segreto), and
Falstaff, in which last a critic remarks that he
made one of his greatest successes .... when he
was at Dresden, and made ib in great measure
by his really excellent acting of the character.
From 1872 till now (1881) he has been en
gaged at Vienna, where he has established his
reputation as a versatile singer and actor in both
baritone and bass parts, but best in the latter,
as his 'carefully deadened high notes form
so great a contrast to the vigorous notes of
his lower and middle register ' (Hanslick).
Among his more recent parts are Hans Sachs
(Meistersinger) Wotan (Nibelungen) — for which
character he was originally selected by Wagner
for Bayreuth — Micheli (Wassertrager) Escamillo,
Marcel, Bertram, and (1879) Seneschal (Jean de
Paris). He has played in the principal German
and Austrian cities, also in Italian opera at
St. Petersburg. [A.C.]
SCAELATTI, ALESSANDRO, a musician of
great importance, and the creator of modern
opera. Of his early life nothing is known
beyond what may be gathered from his tomb
stone * in the St. Cecilia chapel of the Church
of Monte Santo in Naples :
HEIC SITVS EST
EQVES ALEXANDER SCARLACTVS
VIR MODERATIONE BENEFICENTIA
PIETATE INS IGNIS
MVSICES INSTAVRATOR MAXIMVS
QVI SOLIDIS VETERVM NVMERIS
NOVA AC MIRA SVAVITATE
MOLLITIS
ANTIQVITATI GLORIAM POSTERITATI
IMITANDI SPEM ADEMIT
OPTIMATIBVS REGIBVSQ
APPRIME CARVS
TANDEM ANNOS NATVM LXVI EXTINXIT
SVMMO CVM ITALIAE DOLORE
IX KAI/* NOVEMBEIS CI3IOCCXXV
MORS MODIS FLECTI NESCIA
1 For a facsimile of this inscription, now first correctly published,
and differing much from the transcriptions of Fe"tis, Villarosa, and
Tlorimo, we are indebted to Dr. Dohrn, chief of the Koyal Aquarium,
Naples. We have also to thank Sig. Minervini, Mad. Zampini-Salazaro,
and Mr. WreforJ for kind services in reference to it. [G.]
238
SCARLATTI.
From a Maltese cross engraved at the foot of
the inscription it may be supposed that he was
a Knight of the order of Malta.
Since 'ix. Kal. Novembris cioioccxxv' means
Oct. 24, 1725, it follows that Scarlatti was born
in 1659, and we learn from the score of 'Pom-
peo ' (in the possession of Gaspare Selvaggio, and
also verified by Florimo) that his birthplace
was Trapani in Sicily. As to his musical educa
tion, some maintain, though without citing any
authority, that he studied in Parma, while others
declare that he was a pupil of Carissimi (born
1604) in Rome. The eminent antiquarian
Villarosa ('Memorie dei compositori ... del
regno di Napoli ') states (without quoting his
authority) that when Scarlatti moved with his
family to Naples he was a celebrated singer
and player on the harp and harpsichord. The
first ascertained fact in his life is that he was
commissioned to compose for Christina, Queen
of Sweden, an opera ' L' Onestk nell1 amore '
performed in 1680 at her palace in Rome,
and it is a probable inference that he was
even at that time a composer of some mark.
Cramer's ' Musikalisches Magazin ' (2nd year,
668) states that he composed an opera for Munich
in the same year, an assertion which, like many
others concerning Scarlatti, has been copied
without verification from one book to another.
Fe"tis doubted the fact, and it has been com
pletely disproved by Rudhart (' Geschichte der
Oper am Hofe zu Miinchen'). The court of
Bavaria had at that time as representative in
Rome an Abbe" Scarlatti, whose name occurs
frequently in the accounts as receiving large
sums of money. At a brilliant fete given by
this Abbe Scarlatti (Pdre Mene"trier's ' Repre
sentations en musique,' 252) on Aug. 22, 1680,
at the Vigna della Pariola near Rome, 'La
Baviera trionfante, componimento per musica '
was performed, a fact which has given rise to a
series of misstatements, originating with Lipow-
sky, who in his ' National Garde Jahrbuch '
(1814) cites the Abbe" as Alessandro Scarlatti,
and changes the locality to Munich, though
he states in his ' Bayrisches Musiklexicon ' that
no opera of Scarlatti's was produced in Munich
before 1721. ' Pompeo ' was performed at the
royal palace at Naples, Jan. 30, 1684 (Fetis's
copy is dated 1683), an^ on *ne libretto Scarlatti
is styled Maestro di capella to the Queen of
Sweden. In 1693 he composed an oratorio ' I
dolori di Maria sempre Vergine ' for the Con-
gregazione dei sette Dolori di San Luigi di
Palazzo in Rome, and an opera, ' Teodora,' : in
which may be found many airs having the first
part Da capo after the second, a practice logi
cally and musically correct, and, according to
Kiesewetter first brought into general use by
Scarlatti, though instances of it do occur before
his time. In ' Teodora ' we find also the first
orchestral ritornel, and the germ of the 'recitative
obligate,' with the entire orchestra employed
to accompany the recitative. Violins, violas,
i Abramo Basevi, of Florence, has a contemporaneous copy.
SCARLATTI.
and basses formed the groundwork of his
orchestra, with oboes and flutes (seldom found
together, though an instance occurs in ' Tigrane'),
horns, bassoons, trumpets, and drums. Queen
Christina died in 1688, and in 1694 Scarlatti
was maestro di capella to the Viceroy of Naples,
as we learn from the libretto of Legrenzi's opera
' Odoacre ' to which Scarlatti added some son^s
for a performance at San Bartolomeo (Jan. 5,
1694) stating in the preface with commendable
modesty that the airs thus added are distin
guished by an asterisk, 'for fear of damaging'
Legrenzi's reputation, which was to him an
object of boundless respect.' Other operas were
'Pirrho e Demetrio ' (1697), ' II Prigionero for-
tunato ' (1698), and 'Laodicea e Berenice'
(1701), which added enormously to his fame,
and in which there was a tenor solo with an
obligate violin accompaniment, played by Corelli,
but with so little success that Scarlatti after
wards substituted another air for it. On Dec.
31, 1703, he became assistant maestro di capella
to Antonio Foggia at Santa Maria Maggiore in
Rome, and succeeded to the chief post May
1707. Cardinal Ottoboni also took him up,
and made him his private maestro di capella, as
we learn from the libretto of his ' Trionfo della
Liberta' (Venice 1707). Soon after this he re
ceived the order of the Golden Spur.2 He resigned
Santa Maria Maggiore in 1709, returned to
Naples, and died Oct. 24, 1725.
Scarlatti's fertility was enormous. ' Tigrane '
(1715) is called on the libretto his io6th opera,
and there were in all 115, of which only 41 are
extant, including, besides those already men
tioned : —
11 Prigionero superbo (Naples)
Equivoche nel sembiante ; Eraclea
(with all the instruments men
tioned, except drums, 1700; score
in the F6tis Collection, Brussels) ;
Nozze col nemico ; Mitridate ; II
Figlio delle selve (1702); La Ca-
duta dei Decemviri (1706) ; 11 Medo
(1708, much praised by Fe'tis) ;
Martirio di Santa Cecilia (Home)
and Teodosio (Naples 1709);
Giro riconosciuto (Borne 1712);
Porsenna, -with Lotti (San Barto
lomeo, Naples, 1713); Scipione nelle
Spagne, Amor generoso, and Ar-
rninio (Naples 1714) ; Carlo R£
d'Allemania, and Virtu trionfante
dell' odio e dell' amore (1716);
Trionfo dell' Onore Fiorentini, and
Telemacco (Naples and Borne 1718)
interesting for its comic inter
mezzo in the Neapolitan dialect;
Tersites ; Attilio Regolo, and Cam-
bisio (1719), also with comic inter
mezzo ; Tito Sempronio Graccho,
with ballets, and Turno Aricinio
(1720); Principessa fedele, and
Griselda (Rome 1721) ; Didone ab-
bandonata (1721).
Undated .-—Amor volubile e ti-
ranno (in the Pa ris Conservatoire);
Olitorio ; Massimo Puppieno ; Non
tutto male vien per nuocere, and
Amazone guerriera (Jlonte Cas-
sino) ; Diana ed Endimione ; La
Merope (Heal Collegio, Naples).
No less prolific as a composer of church-music,
he left over 200 masses, of which few have sur
vived. Jommelli pronounced his masses and
motets the best he knew in the concertante style,
and Hauptmann3 in regard to them happily
compares him and Palestrina as Virgil and
Homer. His secular cantatas were equally numer
ous. Burney saw the original MSS. of 35, each
composed in a single day during a visit at Tivoli
in the autumn of 1704 to Andrea Adami (da
Bolsena), then a well-known singer in the Pope s
choir ; and a Neapolitan amateur told Quantz in
1725 that he possessed 400. His other works
\VI_TC :-
2 Also bestowed on Gluck and Mozart.
3 Letters to Hauser, i. 137.
SCAKLATTL
SCARLATTI.
239
Oratorios.— Dolori di Maria ; Sa-
crifizio d'Abramo (Burney gives a
Cavatina therefrom, History, iv.
121) ; Martirio di Santa Teodosia
(Paris, Bibliotheque Rationale) ;
Concezzioni della beata Vergine ;
Sposa dei sagri cantici ; San Fi-
lippo di Neri (Borne 1718); Ver
gine addolorata (Naples 1722) ;
Stabat Mater, a 4 (Eome 1723);
ditto a 2 ; Passio sec. Johannem.
Church Music.— Several Masses
in the archives of the Keal Col-
legio, Naples, including one a 10
voci, for 2 choirs, violin, and or
gan. Also Concert! Sacri, for 1, 2,
S, and 4 voices (Koger, Amster
dam), now in the F6tis Collection;
Psalms— 'Ave Begina,' and ' Lau
dato,' once iu Abbate Santini's pos
session ; and a Miserere, composed
for the Pope's Choir in 1680.
Secular Music. — Madrigals for
various voices (Padre Martini
gives one for 2 soprani and 2 con-
tralti in his 'Esemplare di Con-
trapunto fugato'); Serenate a 4
for the baptism of the Prince of
Sicily (1723. Monte Cassino) ; Du-
ette (14Nos.). and Cantatas (8 vols.)
are in the Bibliotheque Rationale
Paris.
Scarlatti became in process of time teacher at
three of the Naples Conservatories — San Ono-
frio, I Poveri, and Loreto. Among his numer
ous pupils were — Logroscino, Hasse, Leo,
Durante, Carapello, Greco, Gizzi, Abos, Feo,
Porpora, Sarri, and Contumacci.1 An idea of
his skill in teaching may be gathered from
a pamphlet, unfortunately circulated in MS.
only, 'Discorso di musica sopra un caso parti-
colare in arte del Sig. Cav. Alessandro Scarlatti,
maestro della real capella di Napoli ' (1717, 28
pp. folio with 17 of music), in which he gave
judgment on a dispute referred to his arbitra
tion, between two Spanish musicians about a
striking dissonance employed by one of them.
Maier published (Schlesinger, Berlin) a comic
duet from 'Laodicea e Berenice,' and, besides
those already given there are at Monte Cassino
' Serenata a 3, Venere, Adoni, Amore ' ; Sere-
nata a 3, with instruments, for the opening of a
theatre at Posilippo (1696); 'Genio di Parte-
none' (Matteo Sassoni) ; 'Gloria di Sebeto '
(Vittoria Bombare) ; 'Piacere di Mergellina'
(Domenico 1'Aquilano) ; 'Massimo Puppieno,'
opera, 3 acts ; ' Scipione nelle Spagne,' i st act ;
and ' Porsenna ' 2nd act, recitatives by Antonio
Lotti. ' 36 Ariettas for a single voice, with a
Thorough Bass for the Harpsichord,' were pub
lished in London about 1 750.
Large portions of a mass by Scarlatti are given
by Rochlitz in his 2nd vol. Another was printed
entire by Proske (Ratisbon, 1841) ; a 'Laetatus'
and an ' Exultate ' are given in Proske's ' Musica
Divina'; and a ' Tu es Petrus' for 8 voices
(characterised by Hauptmann as ' very grand, as
if hewn in stone') in Commer's 'Musica Sacra,'
Hi. 96. His instrumental music remains almost
entirely unpublished. A Fugue in F minor is
given by Pauer in his 'Alte Klaviermusik.'
His portrait, after Solimena, may be found in
the ' Biographia degli Uomini illustri del Regno
di Napoli' (1810). [F.G.]
SCARLATTI, DOMENICO, or, according to
2Quadrio, GIEOLAMO, son of Alessandro, born
apparently in Naples, 1683, first learned from
his father, and later from Gasparini. He has
been called a pupil of Bernardo Pasquini,
but that seems most improbable, seeing that
Pasquini was of the school of Palestrina, and
wrote entirely in the contrapuntal style, whereas
Domenico Scarlatti's chief interest is that he was
the first composer who studied the peculiar cha-
1 Fi5tis calls Leo a pupil of Pitoni, an error corrected by Florimo.
2 Storia . . . d'ogni poesia, vii. 249.
racteristics of the free style of the harpsichord.
His bold style was by no means appreciated in
Italy, for Burney remarks ('State of Music in
France and Italy ') that the harpsichord was so
little played that it had not affected the organ,
which was still played in the grand old tradi
tional style. The first work on which Domenico
is known to have been engaged was that of re
modelling for Naples, in 1704, Polaroli's opera
'Irene' (Venice 1695). In 1710 he composed
for the private theatre of Maria Casimira, Queen
Dowager of Poland, a dramma pastorale
'Sylvia' (libretto in the Paris Bibliotheque
Nationale), which was followed by ' Orlando '
(1711), ' Fatide in Sciro' (1712), ' Ifigenia
in Aulide' and 'in Tauride ' (1713), 'Amor
d'un ombra,' and 'Narciso' (1714), and 'Am-
leto' (1715, Teatro Capranico), interesting as
the first musical setting of that subject. In
1708 he was in Venice with Handel, then on his
way from Florence, which he left in January, to
Rome, where he arrived in March, his 'Agrip-
pina ' being performed 27 times in Venice.
Domenico seems to have accompanied him to
Rome, for Cardinal Ottoboni held a kind of
competition between the two, at which the
victory was undecided on the harpsichord, but
when it came to the organ, Scarlatti was the first
to acknowledge his rival's superiority, declaring
that he had no idea such playing as Handel's
existed. The two became fast friends from that
day, they remained together till Handel left
Italy, and met again in London in 1720. Even
in extreme old age Handel spoke with pleasure
of D. Scarlatti, and Mainwaring ('Memoirs,*
61) relates that when Scarlatti was in Spain, if
his own playing was admired, he would turn the
conversation on Handel's, crossing himself at the
same time as a sign of his extreme reverence. In
January 1715 he succeeded Baj as maestro di
capella of St. Peter's in Rome, where he com
posed Masses, Salve Reginas, etc. In 1719 he
went to London, where his 'Narciso' was per
formed (May 30, 1720), and in 1721 to Lisbon,
where he became a court favourite. The long
ing for home and kindred however drove him
back to Naples, where Hasse heard him play
the harpsichord in 1725. In 1729 he was
invited to the Spanish court, and appointed
music-master to the Princess of the Asturias,
whom he had formerly taught in Lisbon. Ac
cording to the 'Gazetta musicale' of Naples
(Sept. 15, 1838) he returned to Naples in 1754,
and died there in 1757. Being an inveterate
gambler he left his family in great destitution,
but Farinelli came to their assistance. (Sacchi's
'Vita di Don Carlo Broschi.')
As we have said, Scarlatti was in some sense
the founder of modern execution, and his in
fluence may be traced in Mendelssohn, Liszt,
and many other masters of the modern school.
He made great use of the crossing of the hands,
and produced entirely new effects by this means.
His pieces, unlike the suites of Handel and his
predecessors, were all short. Santini possessed
349 of them. Of these Scarlatti himself only
240
SCARLATTI.
published one book of 30 pieces, entitled < Eser-
cizii per gravicembalo,' etc., printed according to
Burney in Venice, but at any rate before Aug.
1 746, when the Prince of the Asturias, whose
name is on the title-page, ascended the throne.
In the Fe"tis collection is a Paris edition, 'Pieces
pour le clave9in,' 2 vols., published by Mme.
Boivin (who died Sept. 1733) and Le Clerc.1
' 42 Suits2 of Lessons' were printed by B. Cooke,
London, under the supervision of Scarlatti's
friend Roseingrave (between 1730 and i_737>
when Roseingrave went out of his mind).
Czerny's edition (Haslinger, Vienna, 1839), con
taining 200 pieces, was re-edited (Paris, Sauer,
Girod) and revised by Mme. Farrenc from Rosein-
grave's edition, and MSS. then in possession
of Rimbault. There are also 130 pieces in Far-
renc's 'Tre'sor des Pianistes' (1864) ; 60 Sonatas
are published by Breitkopf; and 1 8 pieces,
grouped as Suites by von Billow, by Peters.
Though the technique of pianoforte -pi ay ing
owes so much to Domenico Scarlatti, he did
nothing towards the development of the sonata.
There seem to have been other musicians of
this name, as Mr. Habeil of Ratisbon saw^in
Rome a melodrama 'Agnus occisus ab origine
Mundi,' signed Francesco Scarlatti, and there is
at Monte Cassino a score by Pietro Scarlatti,
'Clitarro,' with intermezzi' by Hasse. [F.G.]
SCARLATTI, GIUSEPPE, grandson of Ales
sandro, born at Naples 1712. Of his artistic life
but little is known. He settled in Vienna in
1757, up to which date he had produced the
following operas : — ' Pompeo in Arrnenio ' (Rome,
1747); ' Adriano in Siria' (Naples, 1752); 'Ezio'
(Ib. 1754); ' Gli effetti della gran Madre Natura '
(Venice, 1754); 'Merope' (Naples, 1755) ; 'Chi
tutto abbraccia nulla stringe' (Venice, 1756).
In Vienna he brought out eight more at the
court theatre : — ' II mercato di malmantile,' and
'L'isola disabitata' (1757); 'La serva scaltra'
(1759); 'Issipile' and 'La Clemenza di Tito'
(1760); 'Artaserse' (1763); 'Gli stravaganti'
(1765); 'La moglie padrona' (1768). He died
at Vienna Aug. 17, 1777. [C.F.P.]
SCENA (Gr. 3/t 771/77 ; Lat. Scena ; Ital. Scena,
Teatro, Palco ; Ger, Buhne, Auftritt ; Fr. Scdne,
Thddtre ; Eng. Scene, Stage). A term, which, in
its oldest and fullest significance, applies equally
to the Stage, to the Scenery it represents, and to
the Dramatic Action which takes place upon it.
Hence, the long array of synonyms placed at the
beginning of this article.
I. Classical authors most frequently use the
word in its first sense, as applying to that part of
a Greek or Roman Theatre which most nearly
answers to what we should now call the Stage ;
and the classical tendencies of the Renaissance
movement led to its similar use in the i6th cen
tury. Thus, in Peri's 'Euridice,' printed in 1600,
we find the following direction : ' Tirsi viene in
Scena, sonando la presente Zinfonia con un Tri-
flauto ' — ' Thyrsis comes upon the Stage, playing
1 No, 10 in vol. ii. is an organ fugue by Alessandro Scarlatti.
2 Which are not ' Suites,' but single movements.
SCENA.
the present Symphony upon a Triple Flute. [See
OPERA.]
II. In its second sense, the word is commonly
applied, in England, to those divisions of a Drama
which are marked by an actual change of Scenery ;
a method of arrangement which is even extended
to English translations of foreign works.
III. In the Italian, German, and French The
atres, the word is more frequently used, in its
third sense, to designate those subordinate divi
sions of an Act3 which are marked by the
entrance, or exit, of one or more members of the
'Dramatis personae' ; a new Scene being always
added to the list, when a new Character appears
upon, or quits the Stage, though it be only a
Messenger, with half-a-dozen words to say, or
sing. The ostensible number of Scenes, there
fore, in an Italian, or German Opera, is always
far greater than that indicated in an English
version of the same work. For instance, in the
original Libretto of 'Der Freischxitz' 7 Scenes
are enumerated in the First Act, 6 in the Second,
and 1 7 in the Third ; whereas the popular English
translation only recognises I in Act I, 2 in
Act II, and 3 in Act III. An attempt to intro
duce the Continental practice to the English
Theatre was made, some years ago, in the col
lection of Operas called ' The Standard Lyric
Drama ' (Boosey & Co.) ; and, as it has been
revived in the excellent 8vo editions now pub
lishing by Messrs. Novello, it is to be hoped that
uniformity of custom may be eventually esta
blished, at least in all translated works.
IV. In a more limited sense, the term Scena
is applied, by Operatic Composers, to an Accom-
paniedRecitative, either interspersed with passages
of Rhythmic Melody, or followed by a regular
Aria. In the former case, the word is generally
used alone — and always in its Italian form : in
the latter the Composition is sometimes called
' Scena ed Aria.' Less frequently, the place of
pure Recitative is supplied by the introduction
of short strains of Melody, with strongly-marked
variations of Tempo. But, in all cases, it is
de rigueur that the character of the Composition
should be essentially and unmistakably dra
matic throughout. The Scena, thus defined, is
as old as the Opera itself; for the name might
very well be given to the Scene from ' Euridice,'
already alluded to; or to the 'Lamento' in
Monteverde's 'Ariana.' A very fine example,
much in advance of its age, will be found in
' Ah reudimi quel core,' from Francesco Rossi's
' Mitrane ' (1688). Handel used the Scena, with
telling effect, both in Opera and Oratorio ; as in
'Solitudini amate/ in ' Alessandro ' ; 'II poter
quelche brami,' in ' Scipio,' and ' Deeper and
deeper still' and 'Farewell ye limpid streams,'
in 'Jephtha.' Mozart's peculiar aptitude for
this kind of Composition is well exemplified in
his wonderful Scena for two Voices, ' Die Weise-
lehre dieser Knaben,' in 'Die Zauberflote'; in
innumerable delightful instances in his other
Operas; and in a large collection of detached
3 Ital. Atto ; Fr. Acte ; Ger. Aufzug— in allusion to the raising of
the curtain.
SCENA.
pieces, such as 'Ch'io mi scordi,' 'Bella mia
fiamma,' ' Ahi, lo previdi,' ' Misera, dove son ? '
and others, too numerous to mention, most of
them written for the Stage, though some are
clearly intended for the Concert-room, not
withstanding their powerful dramatic expression.
To this latter class of Scenas must be referred
Beethoven's magnificent 'Ah, perfido!' which
ranks, with the Scenas for Leonore, and Florestan,
in ' Fidelio,' among his most passionate Composi
tions for Voice and Orchestra. The Scena was,
unquestionably, Weber's strongest point — wit
ness his three magnificent examples, ' Durch die
W alder,' ' Wie nahte mir die Schlummer,' and
'Ocean, du Ungeheuer,' and his six 'Concert
Arien' — of which, however, five only have as yet
been published. The grand Scena, in Bb, for
Kunegunde in 'Faust,' is one of Spohr's most
notable masterpieces : and the same Composer's
impassioned Instrumental Scena, for Violin and
Orchestra, stands quite alone, as an inspiration
of the highest order. He also wrote a very fine
Scena for the Concert-room — ' Tu m'abban-
doni5 (op. 71): and Mendelssohn has left us a
priceless treasure of this class, in his 'Infelice,'
which embodies an amount of scenic power no
less remarkable than that thrown into the nu
merous similar movements in his Oratorios. The
secret of success, in all these cases, lies in the
intensity of dramatic expression embodied in the
work. When this is present, no really great Com
poser ever fails to hit his mark. In its absence,
the outward form of the Scena becomes a mean
ingless absurdity — a truth which has not been
sufficiently considered by some writers of later
date. [W.S.R.]
SCENARIO. An Italian term, meaning a
sketch of the scenes and main points of an opera
libretto, drawn up and settled preliminary to
filling in the detail. [G.]
SCHABLONE. The German term for a
stencil or pattern, and thence in musical criticism
often applied to music written with too much
adherence to mechanical form or manner, whether
the composer's own, or some one else's — made
on a cut and dried pattern. The term capell-
meister-musik is used by the German critics for a
similar thing. With a slightly different metaphor
we should say, ' cast in the same mould.' [G.]
SCHACHTNER, JOHANN ANDREAS, from
1754 trumpeter to the Archbishop of Salzburg,
and previously, according to a letter of Mozart's
(Oct. 17, 1777) in the church-choir at Irigolstadt,
where he was brought up in the Jesuit school.
He died in 1795. -He was a thorough musician
(much greater knowledge was required to play the
trumpet then than now) and had literary tastes
besides. Being intimate with the Mozart family
he watched with great interest the extraordinary
early development of Wolfgang's genius, and 20
years later wrote, at the request of Mozart's sister,
a letter1 to which we owe a host of characteristic
and touching details. His affection was fully
returned, for ' Wolfgangerl ' would ask him a
i Dated April 24, 1792. Given in full by Jahn, i. 19.
VOL. HI. PT. 2.
SCHACK.
241
dozen times a day if he was really fond of him,
and when Schachtner would sometimes in fun
say ' No,' the tears would start into his eyes ' so
loving and so tender was his little heart.' When
the two were carrying his toys from one room to
the other Wolfgang would insist on their either
singing or fiddling a march. To Schachtner too
the father showed the blotted MS. of the first
PF. concerto, and related the little fellow's
answer to his objection that it was too difficult
— ' That is just why it is called a concerto; people
must practise till they can play it,' upon which
he set to work to try and play it himself. At
this time he was 4, and two years later, after his
return from Vienna, when some trios by a friend
were being tried, he begged to be allowed to
play the second violin, and cried at his father's
refusal (he had had absolutely no instruction in
the violin), till at Schachtner 's intercession Leo
pold Mozart gave way, saying, 'You may play
with Herr Schachtner ; but you must do it softly
so that nobody may hear you.' Schachtner soon
found himself superfluous, and was not surprised
to see tears of joy in the father's eyes. Among
other traits, Schachtner relates as a proof of the
extreme delicacy of the boy's ear his pointing
out that Schachtner's violin was a half-a-quarter
of a tone lower than his own, and on another
occasion his fainting at the sound of the trumpet,
of which up to ten, he had a positive dread.
Schachtner wrote the libretto of an opera 2 which
Mozart intended for Vienna, and had made great
progress with, and translated the libretto of
' Idomeneo ' into German, thus enabling Leopold
Mozart to say (letter to Breitkopf, Aug. 10, 1781)
that it was entirely the work of persons living in
Salzburg, ' the poetry by Court-chaplain Varesco,
the music by my son, and the German trans
lation by Herr Schachtner.' (Jahn's 'Mozart,'
i. 564.) [C.F.P.]
SCHACK, BENEDICT, the first Tamino, and
one of the party3 who stood round Mozart's bed
the night before his death, and at his request
sang the completed portions of the ' Requiem '
as far as the first bars of the ' Lacrimosa,' when
he broke into violent weeping at the thought
that he should never finish it. Schack, who was
born in 1758, was a man of general cultivation,
a thorough musician, and a good flute-player.
He composed several operas for Schikaneder's
theatre. Mozart was on intimate terms with
him, and would often come and fetch him for a
walk, and while waiting for Schack to dress,
would sit down at his desk and touch up his
scores. Schack's voice was a fine tenor, flexible
and sonorous, and his execution thoroughly ar
tistic, but he was a poor actor.4 In 1787 he was
taking second parts only; in 1792 he sang
Tamino, Count Almaviva, and Don Ottavio
(Don Gonsalvo in the German translation) after
which we hear no more of him as a singer. His
J Completed by Andre" as ' Zaide.' Jahn thinks it was most likely
adapted from the French.
3 The others were Mozart's brother-in-law, Hofer, the violinist, and
Franz Xaver Qerl, a bass-singer, and the first Sarastro. Mozart him
self sang the alto.
4 Jahn's ' Mozart,' ii. 510.
R
242
SCHACK.
Operas or Singspiele came between 1789 and
93 ; some were written with Gerl.1 [C.F.P-]
SCHARWENKA, PHILIPP, born Feb. 25,
1847, at Samter, Posen, East Prussia. His taste
for music showed itself early, but he was unable
to cultivate it seriously till the removal of his
family to Berlin in 1865, when he entered
Kullak's ' New Academy.' On completing his
course he remained on the staff of the Academy,
and is now teacher of the rudiments and of com
position. His works are chiefly for PF. — dances
and other drawing-room pieces ; the latest being
an 'Album polonais/ op. 33. But he has also
published songs ; 3 concert pieces for violin and
PF. (op. 17); a serenade (op. 19); studies for
violin, and for cello, and has written two sym
phonies. Herr Scharwenka is also an accom
plished caricaturist, and has illustrated 'Anton
Notenquetscher,' a satirical poem by Alex. Mos-
kowsld (Berlin, 1881), with some very comic
woodcuts. [G.]
SCHARWENKA, XAVER, was also born at
Samter, Jan. 6, 1840; and like his brother was
at Kullak's Academy at Berlin, where he was
known, while still a pupil, for his PF. playing
and his compositions. He made his first appear
ance in public at Berlin, in 1869, and remained
for some time in the Academy as a teacher, until
compelled to leave it for his military duties in
1873. After this he began to travel, and was
soon renowned as a fine and brilliant player,
and a ' young composer of remarkable endow
ments.' In 1877 he produced his first Concerto
for the PF. (in Bb minor, op. 32), playing it to
the meeting of German musicians at Hanover
in May ; it was played in England for the first
time by Mr. Dannreuther at the Crystal Palace
(both place and player well-known in this country
for their chivalrous welcome of new works) Oct.
27, 1877. In 1878, Feb. 14, Scharwenka him
self played it at the Gewandhaus, Leipzig. In
1879 he made his first appearance in England,
played the same work at the Crystal Palace,
March I, and played at the Musical Union,
April 29. In 1880 he returned and played at
the Philharmonic Feb. 19, and elsewhere. In
1 88 1 he made a third visit and played his second
Concerto (in C minor, op. 56, which he had
produced at the Gesellschafts concert at Vienna
Dec. 12, 1880) — at the Philharmonic, Feb. 24.
His stay was shortened by his recall to Germany
for his military duties (a cruel anomaly for an
artist !), but he found time to appear several
times, and deepened the favourable impression
which he had previously made.
Scharwenka's published works number 52.
Opus i is a Trio in Ffl minor for PF., violin
and cello, and op. 2 a Sonata for PF. and
violin, in D minor. He has published a second
PF. trio (in A minor, op. 45), a quartet for
PF. and strings (in F, op. 37), a sonata for
PF. and cello (E minor, op. 46) ; 7 original PF.
duets ; 2 sonatas (in Cj minor and Eb, op. 6 and
i Gerl sang Osmin in 1787 at the same theatre in the Freihaus,
where was produced in 1797 his comic opera in 3 acts ' Die Mas-
kerade,' by ' a former member of this theatre.'
SCHEBEK.
36), 2 scherzos, and a large mass of studies,
dances, romances, and other pieces all for PF.
solo. The first PF. concerto is op. 32 ; the
second is not yet printed. [G.]
SCHAUROTH, DELPHINE (Adolphine) VON,
a Bavarian lady of noble family, a great piano
forte player, with whom Mendelssohn flirted (se
riously, even for him) and played duets, during
his visit to Munich in June i83o.2 She and
Josephine Lang are the two most prominent
figures in his letters of that date. He reached
Venice on Oct. 10, and on the i6th wrote the
well-known ' Venetianisches Gondellied' (Songs
without Words, bk. i. no. 6), which on the MS.,
though not in print, bears the words ' fur Del-
phine Schauroth.' Their acquaintance was re
newed on his return in the following 3 October,
and the G minor Concerto, written at Munich,
is dedicated to her. She was born at Magdeburg
in 1814, and was a pupil of Kalkbrenner. Before
1835 she married Mr. Hill Handley, an English
man, but the union does not appear to have been
happy, and was soon dissolved. Schumann, in
noticing her Sonate brillante in C minor (Diabelli)
and her Caprice (Ibid.), in his 'Neue Zeitschrift
fur Musik' (ii. 1 25 ; v. 132), while kindly quizzing
her consecutive fifths, false relations, and other
marks of inexperience in composing, pardons them
all for the thoroughly musical nature — ' Musik
in ihrem Wesen/ 'der eigentliche musikalische
Nerv' — which her pieces display. Indeed he
goes so far as to class her with Clara Wieck as
'two Amazons in a brilliant procession.' In
1839 she played the Eb Concerto at a concert
given in Munich for the Beethoven monument,
with great brilliancy and success (A. M. Z. xli.
488). In 1870 she gave a recital at Leipzig on
Mendelssohn's birthday, in reference to which
the Signale speaks of her own pieces and two of
Chopin's as having special charm. She is now
(1881) living at Charlottenburg. It is matter of
great regret that a life which began so brilliantly
should, to all appearance, be so much overclouded
at its close. [G.]
SCHAUSPIELDIRECTOR, DER, 'Comodie
mit Musik in i Act' (The Manager, a Comedy
with Music in one Act) ; containing an overture
and 4 numbers ; words by Stephanie, jun., music
by Mozart. Produced at a Court festival at
Schonbrunn, Feb. 7, 1786. Over the terzet
(No. 3) is the date, Jan. 18, 1786. It was
adapted to a Frencli libretto under the name of
' L'lmpresario,' and produced in Paris in 1856.
[See vol. i. p. 768.] A careful version of the entire
piece from the German original, by W. Grist,
was brought out at the Crystal Palace, London,
on Sept. 14, 1877, as 'The Manager,' and re
peated several times there and elsewhere.
An interesting little work, full of details on
this opera and Mozart in general, is 'Mozart's
Schauspieldirector, von Dr. R. Hirsch ' (Leipzig,
1859)- [<*•]
SCHEBEK, EDMUND, a distinguished and
influential Austrian amateur, Doctor of Law,
2 ' Familie Mendelssohn,' Letters, June 11, 26, 1830.
3 Letter of Oct. 6, 1831.
SCHEBEK.
Imperial councillor, and secretary to the Chamber
of Commerce at Prague, was born Oct. 22, 1819,
at Petersdorf in Moravia. He began his musical
career as head of a Society at Olmiitz, and con
tinued it at Prague, where in conjunction with
Weiss, the superior of the Capuchins, and Krejci,
he has revived much of the best old Italian
church music. He has devoted his attention
specially to the construction of the violin, in
relation to which he has published very inter
esting treatises — On the Orchestral Instruments
in the Paris1 Exhibition of 1855 ; On the Cre-
monese instruments, a propos to the Vienna
Exhibition of 1873, and 'the Italian Violin
manufacture and its German origin.'2 He has
also published a valuable little pamphlet on
Froberger. Dr. Schebek possesses a fine collec
tion of ancient stringed instruments, Beethoven
autographs, etc. [G.]
SCHEBEST, AGNES, born at Vienna, Feb. 15,
1813, became attached at a very early age to the
Court Theatre at Dresden, first in the chorus,
and then as singer of small solo parts. Here she
had the inestimable advantage of frequently
hearing and seeing the great Schroeder-Devrient.
In 1833 she left Dresden for Pesth, and from
1836 to 41 starred throughout Germany with
very great applause. Her voice was a fine mezzo-
soprano, her style and method were good, her
best parts heroic, with much energy and passion.
In 1841 she married the great theologian Dr.
David Strauss (himself a keen amateur, and
author of an interesting paper on the Ninth Sym
phony), and died Dec. 22, 1869, at Stuttgart.
She left an account of her career — 'Aus dem
Leben einer Kiinstlerin' (1857). [G.]
SCHECHNER-WAAGEN, NANETTE, dra
matic singer, born at Munich in 1806. She was
employed in the chorus-scenes of the opera, and,
on the occasion of Madame Grassini's visit, was
chosen to second her in some selections from
Cimarosa's 'Gli Orazzi e Curiazi.' Schechner's
beautiful voice made a great impression, and
won for her a patroness in the Queen of
Bavaria. After some study in singing and in
Italian, she appeared in Italian opera in Munich,
until 1827, after which she devoted herself to
German opera. In 1826 she was in Vienna, if a
curious story, related by Schindler, of a scene in
the theatre there, a propos to an air written for
her by Schubert, may be believed. [See SCHU
BERT.] It is related by Fe*tis that, when she first
appeared in Berlin in Weigl's 'Schweizerfamilie,'
the first act was played to an almost empty house ;
but such enthusiasm did her Emmeline arouse
in the few listeners, that the report of it spread
to the neighbouring cafe's during the entr'acte,
a large audience was drawn to the theatre for
the rest of the performance, and the singer's
success was complete. Her Donna Anna, Eury-
anthe, Fidelio, Reiza, Vestalin and Iphigenie in
Tauris excited great admiration in Berlin and
'Die Orchester-Instrumente auf der Pariser Weltausstellung 1m
Jahre 1855 ' (Vienna, Staatsdruckerei, 1858).
! ' Der Geigenbau in Italien und sein deutscher Urspvung ' (Vienna
1S72 and 1874.).
SCHEIBLER.
243
I Munich. In 1832 she married Waagen, a
lithographer and painter.
Madame Schechner's voice was powerful, even
massive in its tones, her acting was earnest and
natural. She took a place in the first rank of
German singers, but her brilliant career lasted
no longer than ten years. A severe illness
injured her voice ; she retired from the stage in
1835, and died in 1860.
Mendelssohn heard her at Munich in 1830, and
while he found her voice much gone off and her
intonation false, says that her expression was still
so touching as to make him weep.3 [L.M.M.]
SCHEIBLER, JOHA.NN HEINRICH, born at
Montjoie or Montschau, near Aix-la-Chapelle,
Nov. n, 1777, died Nov. 20, 1837, silk manu
facturer, after many travels settled down at Cre-
feld, where he was first-assistant-Biirgermeister.
In 1812-13, after some interesting experiments
with Jews-harps, he turned his attention to the
imperfections of existing means of tuning. He
first tried a monochord, but finding that he could
not always get the same note from the same
division of his monochord, he endeavoured to
help himself by beats, and discovered that each
beat corresponded to a difference of two simple
vibrations or one double vibration in a second.
His plan was to fix the monochord by finding the
stopped length which would give a note beating
four times in a second with his own fork. Then,
after endless trials and calculations, he found
similar places for all the divisions of the scale,
and finally from the monochord made forks for
each note of the perfectly equally tempered scale.
By repeated comparisons with his forks he found
that it was impossible to make a mathematically
accurate monochord, or to protect it from the
effects of temperature. He then hit upon the plan
of inserting forks between the forks of his scale,
from the lowest A of the violin to the open A, and
counting the beats between them. It was this
counting that was the trouble, but by highly
ingenious mechanical contrivances he was en
abled to complete the count of his fifty-two forks
within from '0067 to '00083 beats or double vibra
tions in a second, and hence to tune a set of twelve
forks so as to form a perfectly equal scale for any
given pitch of A. The particulars of his forks,
and the mode of counting them are contained in
his little pamphlet 'Der physikalische undmusik-
alische Tonmesser' (Essen, Badeker, 1834, p. 80,
with lithographic plates),* from which the pre
ceding history has been gathered. During his
lifetime he issued four smaller tracts, showing
how to tune organs by beats, which were collected
after his death as ' H. Scheibler's Schriften, etc.'
(Crefeld, Schmiiller, 1838). This is quite out of
print, but copies of the former book are still to be
bought. His wonderful tonometer of fifty-two
forks has completely disappeared. But another
one, of fifty- six instead of fifty-two forks, which
3 Letter, June 6, 1886.
4 ' The physical and musical Tonometer, which proves visibly by
means of the pendulum, the absolute numbers of vibrations of
musical tones, the principal kinds of combinational tones, and the
most rigid exactness of equally tempered and mathematical just
Chords.'
B2
244
SCHEIBLER.
belonged to Scheibler still exists, and was in
herited by his daughter and grandson, who lent it
to Herr Amels, formerly of Crefeld, who again lent
it to Mr. Alexander J. ElHs, who counted it, and
having checked his results by means of M°Leod's
and Mayer's machines for measuring pitch, gave
the value of each fork in the Journal of the Society
of Arts for March 5, 1880, p. 300, correct to less
than one-tenth of a double vibration. The two
extreme forks of this s6-fork tonometer agree in
pitch precisely with those of the 52-fork tono
meter, but no other forks are alike, nor could the
forks of the 52-fork tonometer have been easily
converted into those of the other one. In 1834,
at a congress of physicists at Stuttgart, Scheibler
proposed with approval the pitch A 440 at 69° F.
(=A 440-2 at 59° F.) for general purposes, and
this has been consequently called the Stuttgart
pitch.1 [A.J.H.]
SCHELBLE, JOHANN NEPOMUK, a thoroughly
excellent and representative German musician,
born May 16, 1789, at HofEngen in the Black
Forest, where his father was superintendent of
the House of Correction. His strict musical
education was begun in the Monastery of March-
thai 1800-03; and continued at Donaueschingen,
under Weisse. He then spent some time, first
with Vogler at Darmstadt, and then with Krebs,
a distinguished singer at Stuttgart, and there, in
1812, he filled the post of elementary teacher in
the Royal Musical Institution, a very famous and
complete school of those times.2 In 1813 he
went to Vienna, lived in intimate acquaintance
with Beethoven, Moscheles, Weigl, Spohr, etc.,
composed an opera and many smaller works, and
went on the stage, where however his singing,
though remarkable, was neutralised by his want
of power to act. From Austria in 1816 he went
to Frankfort, which became his home. Here the
beauty of his voice, the excellence of his method,
and the justness of his expression, were at once
recognised. He became the favourite teacher,
and in 1817 was made director of the Musical
Academy. This however proved too desultory
for his views, and on July 24, 1818, he formed
a Society of his own, which developed into the
famous ' Csecilian Society ' of Frankfort, and at
the head of which he remained till his death. The
first work chosen by the infant institution was
the'Zauberflote'; then Mozart's Requiem ; then
one of his Masses ; and then works by Handel,
Cherubini, Bach, etc. In 1821 the Society
assumed the name of the ' Cacilienverein * ; the
repertoire was increased by works of Palestrina,
Scarlatti, and other Italian masters, and at
length, on March 10, 1828, Mozart's ' Davidde
penitente ' and the Credo of Bach's Mass in B
minor were given; then, May 2, 1829 (stimulated
by the example of Mendelssohn in Berlin), the
Matthew Passion ; and after that we hear of
' Samson* and other oratorios of Handel, Bach's
motets, and choruses of Mendelssohn, whose
i He selected it as the mean of the variation of pitch 5n pianos as
then tuned at Vienna, and not from the fact that it enables the scale
filC major, in just intonation, to be expressed in whole numbers, as
has been sometimes stated.
2SeetheA. ,U.Z. 1812, 334.
SCHENCK.
genius Schelble was one of the first to recognise,
and whose ' St. Paul ' was suggested to' him by
the Cdscilian Association, doubtless on the motion
of its conductor. Whether the Society ever at
tempted Beethoven's mass does not appear, but
Schelble was one of the two private individuals
who answered Beethoven's invitation to subscribe
for its publication.' [See vol. i. p. 197 note ; vol. ii.
His health gradually declined, and at length,
in the winter of 1835, it was found necessary to
make some new arrangement for the direction
of the Society. Mendelssohn was asked (Letters,
Feb. 18, 1836), and undertook it for six weeks
during the summer of 1836. Mendelssohn's
fondness and esteem for the man whose place he
was thus temporarily filling is evident in every
sentence referring to him in his letters of this
date. Schelble died Aug. 7, 1837. His great
qualities as a practical musician, a conductor,
and a man, are well summed up by Hiller3 in
his book on Mendelssohn, to which we refer the
reader. His compositions have not survived him.
His biography was published shortly after his
death — ' J. N. Schelble, von Weissmann ' (Frank
fort, 1838). [G.]
SCHELLER, JAKOB, born at Schettat, Ea-
konitz, Bohemia, May 12, 1759, a very clever
violinist. He was thrown on his own resources
from a very early age, and we hear of him at
Prague, Vienna, and Mannheim, where he re
mained for two years playing in the court band,
and learning composition from Vogler. After
more wandering he made a stay of three years in
Paris, studying the school of Viotti. He then,
in 1785, took a position as Concert-meister, or
leading violin, in the Duke of Wiirtemberg'sband
at Stuttgart, which he retained until the esta
blishment was broken up by the arrival of the
French in 1792. This forced him to resume his
wandering life, and that again drove him to in
temperance, till after seven or eight years more
he ended ^miserably, being even obliged to borrow
a fiddle at each town he came to. He was more
celebrated for his tricks and tours de force than
for his legitimate playing. Spohr (Autob. i. 280)
speaks of his flageolet-tones, of variations on one
string, of pizzicato with the nails of the left hand,
of imitations of a bassoon, an old woman, etc. ;
and Fe"tis mentions a trick in which by loosening
the bow he played on all four strings at once. By
these, and probably also by really fine playing,
he excited so much enthusiasm, that it used to
be said of him ' one God ; one Scheller.' The
same things have been done since by really great
artists, such as Ole Bull, and even Paganini, and
with similar effect on their audiences. [G.]
SCHENCK, JOHANN, interesting from his
connection with Beethoven, was born of poor
parents, Nov. 30, 1753, at Wiener Neustadt in
Lower Austria, and at an early age was ad
mitted into the Archbishop's choir at Vienna.
In 1778 he produced his first mass, which he
3 ' Mendelssohn ' translated by Miss M. E. von Glehn, p- 8.
4 Kochtitz, 'Fur Freuude d. Tonkunst.' ii.
SCHENCK.
followed by other sacred pieces and by many
Singspiele and Operas (ending with ' Der Fass-
binder' 1802), which gained him a considerable
name, and rank with those of Dittersdorf and
Wenzel Miiller. The « Dorf bar bier ' (Karnth-
nerthor, Nov. 6, 1796) was always popular, and
is still in use. In addition he wrote symphonies,
concertos, quartets, lieder, etc. The autographs
of many of these are in the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde at Vienna, with that of a theo
retical work, 'Grundsatze des Generalbasses.'
The anecdote of his kissing Mozart's hand
during the overture on the first night of the
' Zauberflote ' has been already related. [See
MOZAET, ii. 394, note.] His first meeting with
Beethoven is told in Bauernfeld's biographical
sketch of Schenck in the ' Wiener Zeitschrift fur
Kunst' for 1837 (Nos, 5, 6, and 7). Gelinek
mentioned to Schenck that he had found a young
man whose playing excelled anything ever heard
before excepting Mozart's, and who had been
studying counterpoint for six months with Haydn,
but to so little purpose that it would be a great
kindness if Schenck would give him some help.
A meeting was arranged at Gelinek's house, when
Beethoven improvised for over half an hour in so
remarkable and unusual a manner that forty years
afterwards Schenck could not speak of it without
emotion. Schenck next went to see the young
artist. Himself a model of neatness he was rather
taken aback by the disorderliness of the room, but
Beethoven's reception was cordial and animated.
On the desk lay some short exercises in counter
point, in which on the first glance Schenck de
tected a few errors. Beethoven's troubles soon
came out. He had come to Vienna aware of his
own ability, but anxious to learn ; had at once
put himself in the hands of the first master to be
got, and yet was making no progress. Schenck
at once agreed to help him, and took him through
Fux's ' Gradus ad Parnassum,' with which indeed
Haydn was familiar enough. As it was essential
that Haydn should not be entirely thrown over,
Beethoven copied exercises partly corrected by
1 Schenck, and Haydn was then able to con
gratulate himself on the progress of his hot
headed pupil. The affair was of course kept
strictly secret, but Beethoven having fallen out
with Gelinek the latter gossipped, and Schenck
was deeply annoyed. Beethoven, however, when
on the point of following Haydn to Eisenstadt
wrote 2 very gratefully to Schenck, and the two
remained on pleasant terms. It is interesting to
know that besides Mozart and Beethoven, Schenck
was acquainted with Schubert. Bauenfeld intro
duced them, and so congenial were they that after
an hour's talk they parted like old friends.
Very unassuming in his ways, Schenck was
respected as a thorough though somewhat pe
dantic teacher of the piano and composition.
His portrait in the Museum of the Gesellschaft
i This surely says a great deal for Beethoven's patience, and for his
desire not to offend Haydn.
'• ' I wish I were not starting to-day for Eisenstadt. I should like
to have had more talk with you. In the meantime you may count
upon my gratitude for the kindness you have shown me. I shall do
all in my power to return it. I hope to see you and enjoy your
society again soon. Farewell, and do not forget your BEETHOVEN.'
SCHERZO.
245
der Musikfreunde, in Vienna, shows a pleasing
countenance. When over 80 he still took pleasure
in work, and set about remodelling his ' Jagd,'
for which he got Bauernfeld to write him a new
libretto. He had finished the first act when he
died, Dec. 29, 1836. [C.F.P.]
SCHERZANDO, SCHERZOSO, playful, lively;
a direction of frequent occurrence, indicating a
passage of a light and cheerful character. It is
occasionally used, in combination with some
other direction, to indicate the style of a whole
movement, as Allegro scherzando, Allegretto seller-
zando (Beethoven, Symphony No. 8), etc., but
its more usual and characteristic application is
to a phrase which is to be played in a lively
manner, in contrast to the rest of the movement
or to some other phrase. In such passages, as
a rule, the time is intended to be taken more
freely than usual, while an}^ marks of phrasing
which occur should be strictly adhered to. In
fact the phrasing of a scherzando passage is of
paramount importance, for by it alone can the
proper character be given. — The word is found,
where one would little expect it, in the 'Et
vitam venturi' of Beethoven's Mass in D, near
the beginning, in the old editions ; but on refer
ence to Breitkopf & Hartel's complete edition
it turns out to have been read in error for
sforzando ! [J.A.F.M.]
SCHERZO. An Italian word signifying 'jest '
or ' joke.' Its application in music is extensive,
and — as is the case with many other musical titles
— often incorrect. Most of the movements, from
the time of Mendelssohn onwards, would be better
designated as ' Caprices ' or ' Capriccios.' Obvi
ously the word signifies that the piece to which it
applies is not merely of a light and gay character,
but is of the nature of a joke, in that it possesses
that rare quality in music, humour. But, exclu
sive of Haydn and Beethoven, what musician shows
humour, real unaffected drollery, in his music ?
The term seems to have been first employed
(Scherzando) merely as a direction for perform
ance, but there are early instances of its use as a
distinctive title. The light Italian canzonets
popular in Germany in the I7th century were
called Scherzi musicali. In 1688 Johann Schenk
published some ' Scherzi musicali per la viola di
gamba.' Later, when each movement of an instru
mental composition had to receive a distinctive
character, the directions Allegretto scherzando
and Presto scherzando became common, several
examples occurring in the Sonatas of Ph. Em.
Bach. But even in the ' Partitas ' of his great
father, we find a Scherzo preceded by a Burlesca
and a Fantaisie, though few modern ears can
discover anything of humour or fancy in either
of these. The Scherzo commences
etc.
246
SCHERZO.
and might as well have been termed a Gavotte.
There is another Scherzo among the doubtful
works beginning thus :
&
Many of the Gigues are far more frolicsome than
these would-be jests. In Peters's edition of Scar
latti's Clavecin pieces, will be found a piece with
the following theme for principal subject, which
the editor, von Bulow, has entitled a Scherzo : —
Vivace
The initial figure of this theme, treated in free
imitation, runs through the movement. As a
similar phrase forms so distinctive a feature of
the Scherzo to Beethoven's 7th Symphony it is not
unfair to compare the two, and remark the differ
ence between a merely bright little piece with no
particular qualities, and a true Scherzo which fills
the heart with lively and delightful thoughts. In
the same volume will be found a Capriccio (No. 4)
which is a real Scherzo in all but name.
Coming now to the period of the Symphony it
may be as well to remind the reader of a fact
which will be more enlarged upon under that
heading, namely, that the presence of the Minuet
or Scherzo in works of the symphonic class, is a
matter of natural selection, or survival of the
fittest. In the old Suites the Minuet, being of
rather shorter rhythm than the other dances,
was seized upon, perhaps unconsciously, by the
great masters who tied themselves down to the
old form, and was exaggerated out of all recogni
tion for the sake of contrast. The actual Minuet,
as danced from the 1 6th century up to the present
day (if any one still learns it), is in the time of
that famous specimen in Mozart's Don Juan, or
say M. M. «! = 80. Yet even in the Suites of Bach
one finds quick and slow Minuets, neither having
any regard to the requirements of the dance.
When we come to Haydn the term Minuet ceases
to have any meaning ; the stateliness and char
acter of the dance are quite gone, and what we
should call a Waltz appears. But with the
true instinct of an artist, Haydn felt that in a
work containing such heavy subtleties (for even
Haydn was deemed heavy and subtle once) as
the ordinary first movement and slow movement,
a piece of far lighter character was imperatively
demanded. So lighter and quicker and more
sportive grew the Minuets, till Beethoven crowned
the incongruous fashion with the ' Minuet ' of his
ist Symphony, It should be mentioned, however,
that Mozart never departed nearly so far from
the true Minuet as Haydn, whose gaiety of
musical thought drove him into really inventing
the Scherzo, though he did not use the name.
The Minuets of many of the String Quartets of
Haydn exhibit indeed those quaint and fanciful
SCHEKZO.
devices of unexpected reiteration, surprises of
rhythm, and abrupt terminations, which are the
leading characteristics of the Scherzo, and are
completely opposed to the spirit of the true
Minuet. One which begins and ends each part
with these bars
rr
8ve basso.
is a strong instance in point.
Beethoven quickly gave the Scherzo the per
manent position in the Symphony which it now
occupies. He also settled its form and character.
As to form, why, the old Minuet and Trio was
as good a skeleton as any other ; for what matters
the shape of the bones when we are dazzled by
the form which covers them ? It is a good
answer to those who consider the classical forms
worn out and irksome to the flow of inspira
tion to point out that in the Scherzo, where
full rein is given to the individual caprice of
the musician, there is as much attention given
to construction as anywhere. In fact, either
the bold and masculine First-movement form, or
its sister, the weaker and more feminine Rondo
form must be the backbone of every piece of
music with any pretensions to the name. But,
lest the light and airy character of the Scherzo
should be spoilt by the obtrusion of the ma
chinery, the greater composers have sought to
obscure the form artistically by several devices,
the most frequent and obvious being the humor
ous persistent dwelling on some one phrase —
generally the leading feature of the first subject—
and introducing it in and out of season, mixed
up with any or all of the other subjects. Wit
ness the Scherzo of Beethoven's gth Symphony,
quoted below, where the opening phrase is used
as an accompaniment to the 2nd subject — indeed
as a persistent ' motto ' throughout. Apart from
this there is not the slightest departure from rigid
First-movement form in this great movement.
The Trio, which is a relic of the Minuet and
takes the position of third subject or middle sec
tion in a Rondo, survives because of the natu
rally felt want of a contrast to the rapid rhythm
of the Scherzo. Many modern composers affect
to dispense with it, but there is usually a central
section answering to it, even though it be not
divided off from the rest by a double bar. Men
delssohn has been the most successful in writing
Scherzos without Trios. The main idea was
to have a movement in extremely short and
marked rhythm, for which purpose triple time
is of course the best. In the Pianoforte Sonatas
the Scherzo to that in Eb (Op. 31, No. 3) is
the only instance where Beethoven has employed
2-4. The Trios to the Scherzos of the Pasto
ral and Choral Symphonies are 2-4 and C f°r
special reasons of effect and contrast. It may
be worth noticing that Beethoven invariably
writes 3-4 even where 6-8 or 3-8 could equally
well have been employed. This is no doubt in
order that the written notes should appeal to the
SCHERZO.
SCHERZO.
247
eye as much as the sounded notes to the ear. In
fact three crotchets, with their separate stems,
impress far more vividly on the mind of the
player the composer's idea of tripping lightness
and quick rhythm than three quavers with
united tails. Having once ousted the Minuet,
Beethoven seldom re-introduced it, the instances
in which he has done so being all very striking,
and showing that a particularly fine idea drove
him to use a worn-out means of expression. In
several cases (PF. Sonatas in Eb, op. 7 ; in F,
op. 10, etc.) where there is no element of
humour he has abstained from the idle mockery
of calling the movement a Minuet, because it is
not a Scherzo, as others have done ; yet, on the
other hand, the third movements of both the
ist, 4th, and 8th Symphonies are called Minuets
while having little or nothing in common with
even the Symphony Minuets of Haydn and
Mozart. Amongst Beethoven's endless devices for
novelty should be noticed the famous treatment
of the Scherzo in the C minor Symphony ; its
conversion into a weird and mysterious terror,
and its sudden reappearance, all alive and well
again, in the midst of the tremendous jubilation
of the Finale. Symphony No. 8, too, presents
some singular features. The second movement
is positively a cross between a slow movement
and a Scherzo, partaking equally of the senti
mental and the humorous. But the Finale is
nothing else than a rollicking Scherzo, teeming
with eccentricities and practical jokes from be
ginning to end, the opening jest (and secret of
the movement) being the sudden unexpected
entry of the basses with a tremendous C sharp,
afterwards turned into D flat, and the final one,
the repetition of the chord of F at great length
as if for a conclusion, and then, when the hearer
naturally thinks that the end is reached, a start
off in another direction with a new coda and
wind-up.
As a specimen of true Scherzo — that is, a
movement in strict form and with quaint and
whimsical humorous devices springing up un
expectedly, but naturally, throughout, — the
Scherzo of the 9th Symphony must ever stand
without a rival. The tiny phrase which is the
nucleus of the whole is thus eccentrically in
troduced : —
Str. Jf
£V
Tutti
j,_3 jt-H*-!*
£:
Timp.
fr-r-a-
*-="«-«-
C!
preparing us at the outset for all manner of
starts and surprises. The idea of using the
drums for this phrase seems to have tickled Bee
thoven's fancy, as he repeats it again and again.
Humour is more unexpected in Schubert than
in Beethoven, and perhaps because of its un
expectedness we appreciate it the more. The
Scherzo of the C major Symphony is full of
happy thoughts and surprises, as fine as any
of Beethoven's, and yet distinct from them.
The varied changes of rhythm in 2, 3 and 4
bars, the piquant use of the wood wind, and
above all the sudden and lovely gleam of sun
shine —
Flute b<2_«
fef.
-V : 1 1 - 1
1 — T-V-4-
*y
Oboe
1 II in
EP •!!
1 r
1
1 'II
•II
combine to place this movement among the
things imperishable. The Scherzos of the Octet,
the Quintet in C, and above all, the PF. Duet
in C, which Joachim has restored to its rightful
dignity of Symphony, are all worthy of honour.
The last-named, with its imitations by inversion
of the leading phrase, and its grotesque bass
a
m
is truly comical.
It is much to be regretted that the more
modern composers have lost sight of the true
bearing of the Scherzo so completely. Mendels
sohn indeed has given it an elfish fairy cha
racter, but though this is admirable in the
* Midsummer Night's Dream,' it is perhaps a
little out of place elsewhere. Lightness and
airy grace his Scherzos possess to admiration,
in common with his Capriccios, which they closely
resemble ; but the musical humour which vents
itself in unexpected rhythms and impudent up-
startings of themes in strange places, neither
he nor any later composer seems to have had
an idea of. Mendelssohn has not used the title
'Scherzo' to either of his five symphonies, though
the 'Vivace non. troppo' of the Scotch, the
'Allegretto' of the Lobgesang, and the 'Allegro
Vivace ' of the Reformation are usually called
Scherzos. It is sufficient to name the String
Octet, the two PF. Trios and the two Quintets
for Strings, as a few of his works which contain
the most striking specimens in this line. As
before mentioned, his Capriccios for Piano are
pieces of the same order, and No. 4 of the
' Sieben Charakter-stiicke ' (op. 7) may be classed
with them.
With Schumann we find ourselves again in a
new field. Humour, his music seldom, if ever,
presents, and he is really often far less gay in
his Scherzos than elsewhere. He introduced the
innovation of two Trios in his Bb and C Symphon
ies, PF. Quintet, and other works, but although
this practice allows more scope to the fancy of
the composer in setting forth strongly contrasted
movements in related rhythm, it is to be depre
cated as tending to give undue length and con
sequent heaviness to what should be the light
est and most epigrammatic of music. Beethoven
has repeated the Trios of his 4th and 7th Sym
phonies, but that is quite another thing. Still,
though Schumann's Scherzos are wanting in light
ness, their originality is more than compensation.
The Scherzos of his orchestral works suffer also
from heavy and sometimes unskilful instrument-
248
SCHEEZO.
ation, but in idea and treatment are full of charm.
Several of his Kreisleriana and other small PF.
pieces, are to all intents and purposes Scherzos.
Though the modern composers have not pro
duced many remarkable Scherzos, it is not for
want of trying. Eubinstein has a very pretty
idea in 6-4 time in his Pianoforte Octet, and a
very odd one in his A major Trio. The 'Ocean '
Symphony has two Scherzos, in excellent con
trast, the first being in 2-4 time, and slightly
Schumannish, and the second in 3-4 time, with
quite a Beethoven flavour. The first of these is
not, however, entitled Scherzo by the composer
any more than is the second movement of his
'Dramatic' Symphony, which begins with the
following really humorous idea : —
2
TT'b a •
i J
C() 4-r | | — T-
B •
i . j_
-* —
^ — ^^~r
=tSJT
-g-d—
' c
• » j • *
J J J JB*
J
2
K»JI»
9
g-
i — • s
—JBjfHS-
—^
b-^li 2-H hi
1 •
-p r-i
r^ —
— P-
Eaff has — as frequently in other cases — spoilt
many fine ideas by extravagances of harmony
and lack of refinement. The two PF. Quar
tets (op. 202) show him at his very best in
Scherzo, while his wonderful and undeservedly
neglected Violin Sonatas have two eccentric
specimens. The 1st Sonata (E minor, op. 73) has
a Scherzo with bars of 2, 3, 4, and 5 crotchets at
random ; thus : —
-*-+-
while the Trio, which is in 3-4 time, is played so
a tempo rubato as to appear equally timeless
with the above. In the Scherzo of the 2nd
Sonata (A major, op. 78) occurs an odd effect.
For no less than 56 bars the Violin sustains its
low G as a pedal, while continuing a bagpipe
melody against brilliant running accompaniment.
In the Symphonies the ' Dance of Dryads' of the
' Im Walde ' is perhaps the best Scherzo, most
of the others being too bizarre and artificial.
Unlike Schubert and Beethoven, Brahms seldom
rises sufficiently from his natural earnestness to
write a really bright Scherzo, but he has pub
lished one for PF. solo (op. 4) which is very odd
and striking. The 2nd Symphony has a move
ment which is a combination of Minuet and
Scherzo, and certainly one of his most charming
ideas. On somewhat the same principle is the
Scherzo of the 2nd String Sextet (op. 36) which
begins in 2-4 as a kind of Gavotte, while the
Trio is 3-4 Presto, thus reversing the ordinary
practice of making the Trio broader and slower
than the rest of the piece.
Quite on a pedestal of their own stand the
four Scherzos for piano by Chopin. They are
indeed no joke in any sense ; the first has been
entitled 'Le Banquet infernal,' and all four are
SCHEUEMANN.
characterised by a wild power and grandeur
which their composer seldom attained to.
Among recent productions may be noticed the
Scherzo for orchestra by Goldmark, the so-called
Intermezzo of Goetz's Symphony, the Scherzos
in Dvorak's Sextet, and other chamber works.
We have omitted mention of the strangely in
strumented ' Queen Mab ' Scherzo of Berlioz —
more of a joke in orchestration than anything.
The position of the Scherzo in the Symphony —
whether second or third of the four movements —
is clearly, a matter of individual taste, the sole
object being contrast. Beethoven, in the large
majority of cases, places it third, as affording
relief from his mighty slow movements, whereas
most modern composers incline to place it as a
contrast between the first and slow movements.
The matter is purely arbitrary. [F.C.]
SCHEUEMANN, GUSTAV, a native of
Prussia, commenced the practical working of his
patent processes of type-music-printing in 1856,
at 86 Newgate Street, where he had been long
established as a music publisher, and keeper of a
circulating library of music. Feeling that music-
printing was capable of much improvement, he
devoted himself with extraordinary zeal to the
perfecting of the various features of his patents
(May 17, and Oct. n, 1856). His chief aims
were the production of an inexpensive kind of
music-type, which would cost less for setting up ;
an easy mode of transposing to various keys ; and
a marked improvement in the general appearance
of the music. Everything was done under his
own supervision. Punch-cutters, type-founders,
compositors, pressmen, and electrotypers were
engaged, and rapid progress made, the various
processes being carried out upon the premises.
The mode of procedure was to set up the notes
and various characters in one 'forme,' and the
staves, formed of brass rules, in another, bringing
the two together for proofs or printing. The
press used for this purpose was one of peculiar
construction. Both ' formes ' were placed upon
the same ' table,' and, by a very simple arrange
ment, good register secured in two pulls. The
main feature of the process consisted in impress
ing the two 'formes' into one mould, and from
that mould producing a perfect electro music-
plate. [See MUSIC-PRINTING, vol. ii. p. 433.]
Nothing could exceed the perfection of the speci
mens obtained by double printing ; there being no
joins, each type represented an entire character.
SCHEURMANN.
Large ' spaces,' the depth of the stave, divided
the various characters from each other, so that
they could be set up and spaced out like ordinary
type, a great saving of time being thus effected.
In perfecting the process up to double-printing an
important stage was reached ; but the production
of equally good work from the perfected plates,
in one printing, proved an insurmountable diffi
culty, the slightest variation in the impression
or register being enough to destroy the beauty of
the whole. Machine after machine was tried ;
Mr. John Rennie, the engineer, giving all the
assistance in his power, but without success. The
process, up to double-printing, was all that
could be desired, as far as appearance was con
cerned, but was too expensive for the production
of cheap music. Mr. Scheurmann risked and
lost all he possessed in resolving to be satisfied
with nothing less than the full accomplishment
of his patent. Messrs. Henderson & Rait, of
Marylebone Lane, both of whom had more or
less to do with the working of the patents, exhi
bited all that then remained of the plant at
the Caxton Celebration at South Kensington in
1878. The beautiful punches are almost com
plete ; but most of the matrices have disappeared.
Although Mr. Scheurmann's efforts were not
fully successful, it is not too much to say that,
indirectly, he was the means of many improve
ments being made in the ordinary music founts
during the past thirty years. [W.H.]
SCHICHT, JOHANN GOTTFKIED, born at
Eeichenau, Zittau, Sept. 29, 1753, owed his
education to an uncle ; went to Leipzig univer
sity intending to study law, but gradually
adopted music, and was soon chosen by Adam
Hiller as solo clavier player at his concerts.
On Killer's retirement he succeeded him, and
at length in 1810 rose to the head of his pro
fession as Cantor of the St. Thomas School.
He died Feb. 16, 1823, leaving a good memory
and many original large works, as well as a trans
lation of the PP. Schools of Pleyel and dementi,
and of Pellegrini, Celoni's Singing Method, etc.,
but only one which will live, his edition of J. S.
Bach's motets, five for 8 and one for 5 voices
(Breitkopf & Hartel 1802, 3), in which however
No. 3 ' Ich lasse dich nicht ' is not by John
Sebastian, but by John Christopher, Bach. [G.]
SCHIEDMAYER. There are now two firms
^ of this name in Stuttgart, both enjoying wide re
putation as pianoforte-makers, viz. ' Schiedmayer
& Sons/ and 'Schiedmayer, Pianofortefabrik ;
i vormals, J. & P. Schiedmayer.' The heads of
these firms are the grandsons and great-grandsons
f of Johann David Schiedmayer, who towards the
close of last century was a musical instrument
' maker at Erlangen, and afterwards at Nuremberg,
where he died in 1806. His son Johann Lorenz,
went after this for two years to Vienna as a work
man, and in 1809 established a business at Stutt
gart in partnership with C. F. Dieudonne' (who
died in 1 825). Before that time pianoforte-making
jt was as good as unknown in Stuttgart; those who
required satisfactory instruments obtaining them
SCHIKANEDER.
249
from Vienna. Lorenz Schiedmayer's intelligence
and aptness for business gained a position for his
firm, and it soon became one of the first in Germany.
In 1845 Lorenz united his two eldest sons, Adolf
and Hermann, to himself, and ' Schiedmayer &
Sons' soon became as well known in foreign coun
tries as in Wiirtemberg. Lorenz died in 1 860 and
his son Hermann in 1 861 . The sons of the brothers
Adolf and Hermann, bearing the same Christian
names, have been for some years the directors of
this firm, which has made both concert and or
dinary instruments, and has competed with success
in London and Paris and other exhibitions. The
two younger sons, Julius and Paul, at first devoted
themselves to harmonium-making, a practical
knowledge of which, then of recent introduction,
had been gained by Paul in Paris. They started
together in 1854, but after the death of the father,
in 1860, turned to pianoforte-making in competi
tion with the elder firm. Julius died in January
1878, and the younger firm has since been known
as 'Schiedmayer, Pianofortefabrik.'
Special mention must be made of Julius Schied
mayer's prominence as an expert in the Juries of
the great Exhibitions of London 1862, Paris 1867,
Vienna 1873, and Philadelphia 1876. [A.J.H.]
SCHIKANEDER, EMMANUEL, theatrical
manager, playwright, actor, and singer, born
1751 at Ratisbon, began life as a poor wandering
musician, joined some strolling players at Augs
burg in 1773, married the adopted daughter of
the manager, and at length undertook the
direction himself. In 1780 his wanderings
brought him to Salzburg, where he fell in with
the Mozarts, and at once began to make a profit
out of Wolfgang's talents. In 1784 we find him
in Vienna, giving with Kumpf a series of ex
cellent performances of German opera, comedy,
etc., at the Karnthnerthor theater. He appeared
on the boards both here and at the Burgtheater,
where however he did not succeed. He next
took the management of the theatre at Ratisbon,
but was recalled to Vienna by his wife, who had
undertaken the little theatre lately built in the
grounds of Prince Starhemberg's house in the
suburb of Wieden, for which Schikaneder re
ceived a privilegium or licence.1 He had no
scruples as to the means to be adopted to make a
hit, but in spite of large receipts was continually
in difficulty. On one such occasion (March
1791) he had recourse to Mozart, whom he
implored to set to music a libretto adapted by
himself from a piece by Giesecke, a member of
his company. Mozart, always goodnatured,
especially to a brother -mason, consented, and
from that moment till its completion Schi
kaneder stuck closely to him, and did all he
could to keep him amused over his work. The
history of the ' Zauberflote ' is well known;
Schikaneder made various suggestions in the
composition, took the part of Papageno, and found
himself saved from ruin by the success of the
opera ; but he showed little gratitude to Mozart,
and after his death, instead of helping the
i It was popularly called Schikaneder's theatre.
250
SCHIKANEDER.
widow of the man by whom he had benefitted so
materially, contented himself with loud and
vain lamentations. In 1800 he entered into
partnership with a merchant named Zitterbarth,
who at a short distance from the small theatre
just mentioned, built the present 'Theater an
der Wien,' opened June 13, 1801. Zitterbarth
then bought the privileging from Schikaneder,
who managed it for him till 1806. His next
project was to build, with the assistance of some
wealthy friends, a new theatre in the Joseph-
stadt suburb, but this he did not carry out. On
his way to Pesth, whither he had been invited
to undertake a theatre, he went mad, was
brought beck to Vienna, and died in great
misery Sept. 21, 1812.
Schikaneder wrote the librettos for many
popular operas, Singspiele, and fairy-pieces, the
list of which, with year of performance, is here
published for the first time :
'Anton der dumme Gartner'
(SchackandGerl),1789; 'Diebeiden
Antons' (with 4 sequels), 'Jakob
und Nannerl,' and ' Der Stein der
Weisen," or 'Die Zauberinsel'
(Schack and others), 1790;
Zauberflote ' (Mozart), 1791 ;
Die
Der
wohlthiitige Derwisch,' or ' Die
Schel!enkappe '(Schack, Gerl, and
others), 1792; 'Die EisenkOnigin,'
' Die WaldmKnner,' and ' Der Zau-
berpfeil ' (Lickl), 1793 ; ' Der Spiegel
von Arkadien' (Siissmayer), and
'Die Hirten am Khein,' 1794;
• Der Scheerenschleifer ' (Henne-
berg), ' Der KGnigssohn aus Itha-
ka' (A. F. Hoffmeister), and ' Der
HSlIenberg' (Wolffl), 1795; 'Der
Tyroler Wastel' (Haibel), and a
2nd part ' Oesterreich's treue Brii-
der,' 1796 ; ' Das medizinische Con-
silium ' (Haibel), 'Der Lowenbrun-
nen' (Seyfried), and 'Babylons
Pyramiden' (Act. i. Gallus, Act. ii.
Peter Winter), 1797; 'Das Laby
rinth,' or ' Kampf mit den Ele-
menten' (2nd part of 'Zauber-
fl8te.' Winter), 1798 ; 'Die Ostin-
dier vom Spittelberg ' 1 (Seyfried,
Stegmayer, etc.), 'Conrad Lang-
barth,' or 'Der Burggeisf (Hen-
neberg), 'Minna und Peru,' or
' Konigspflicht' (Act i. Henneberg,
Act ii. Seyfried), and ' Der Wun-
dermann am Wasserfall' (Sey
fried), 1799; 'Amors Schiffchen '
(Seyfried), 1800, At the Theater
an -der -Wien— opening night—
'Alexander' (Teyber) and 'Thes-
pis Traum,' and 'Proteus und
Arabiens SOhne '(Stegmayer), 1801;
'Tsching! Tsching'' (Haibel),
1802 ; ' Die Entlarvten,' a continu
ation of the 'Waldmanner' (An
ton Fischer), and ' Pfandung und
Personalarrest ' (Teyber), 1803 ;
'Der Stein der Weisen' (Schack
and others), 1804 ; ' Swetards Zau-
berthal ' (Fischer), 1805 ; ' Die Ei-
senkonigin ' (Henneberg), and
' Die Kurgaste am Sauerbrunnen '
(Anton Diabelli), Schikaneder's
last piece, given for his benefit,
1806.
[C.F.P.]
SCHILLING, DR. GUSTAV, author of a
book much esteemed in Germany, though little
known in England — ' Encyclopadie der gesamm-
ten musikalischen Wissenschaften, oder Uni
versal Lexikon der Tonkunst.'2 He was born
Nov. 3, 1805, at Schwiegershausen, Hanover,
where his father was clergyman. He was brought
up at Gottingen and Halle, and in 1830 settled
in Stuttgart as director of Stopel's Music School.
In 1857 he went to America, and is now living
in Montreal. He has published several other
works bearing on music, but none of the im
portance of that already mentioned. [G.]
SCHIMON, ADOLF, son of an Austrian
artist, well-known for his portraits of Beethoven,
Weber, Spohr, etc., was born on Feb. 29, 1820,
at Vienna. At 16 he went to Paris and entered
the Conservatoire as a pupil of Berton and
HaleVy. In 1844 he brought out an opera called
Stradella at the Pergola in Florence. In 1850
he was in London, and took a provincial tour
with Balfe, Reeves, and Clara Novello. From
1854 to 59 he was attached to the Italian opera
J A locality in one of the suburbs of Vienna.
2 Encyclopaedia of General Musical Knowledge, or Universal Lexi
con of Music (7 vols. 8vo. Stuttgart, 1835-iO).
SCHINDELMEISSER.
in Paris, and in 1858 produced a comic opera,
' List urn List,' which was successful in North
Germany. In 1872 we find him again at Flor
ence, where he married Miss Anna Regan. (See
below.) From 1874 to 77 he was teacher of
singing in the Conservatorium at Leipzig, and
from thence was called to Munich, where he is
now professor of singing in the Royal Music
School. His original compositions embrace quar
tets, trios, and solos for the PF., and songs in
various languages, and he has edited many vocal
pieces by Scarlatti, Porpora, Paradies, and other
old Italian masters. His wife, ANNA REGAN-
SCHIMON, was born at Aich, near Carlsbad, Sept.
1 8, 1841, and was brought up in the house of
Dr. Anger in Carlsbad till 1859, when she was
placed as a pupil with Mine. Schubert (nee Mas-
chinka-Schneider) in Dresden. In the following
year she accompanied Mad. Sabatier-UNGHER,
the great contralto, to Florence, where she re
mained under the care of that eminent artist till
Feb. 1864. During this time she made her first
attempts on the stage at Siena, her success in
which encouraged her in further study. From
1864 to 67 she was engaged at the Court theatre
at Hanover. Then as Kammersangerin to the
Grand Duchess Helena in St. Petersburg, where
she sang at three of the seven concerts given by
Berlioz. In 1869 she visited London in com
pany with her old friend and teacher, Mad.
Sabatier, sang twice at the Philharmonic Bnd
three times at the Crystal Palace, and at Mr. C.
Halle's Recitals, etc. From this time till 1875
she was frequently in England, widely-known
and much liked for her exquisite delivery of Schu
bert's and other songs. In 1870 and 71 she
visited Vienna with great success, and in 1872
married Dr. Schimon. Since then, excepting
two brilliant tournees with Monbelli, Sivori,
Trebelli, etc., in the winters of 1872 and 1873,
she has almost retired from public appearance,
save only at the Gewandhaus Concerts at Leip
zig, where she is a regular and very favourite
singer. [G.]
SCHINDELMEISSER, Louis, was born at
Kb'nigsberg, Dec. 8, 1811, and educated at the
Gymnasium at Berlin. Music he learned from
a French musician named Hostie", and from
Gahrich. He first adopted the clarinet, but
afterwards took a wider range. From 1832 to
1837 he filled Capellmeister's posts at Salzburg,
Innspruck, Gratz, then at Berlin (Konigstadt
theatre), and at Pesth, where he remained for
nine years. He at length came to an anchor as
Court-capellmeister at Darmstadt, where he died
March 30, 1864. His works embrace six
operas— ' Mathilde,' 'Ten happy days,' 'Peter
von Szapary' (Pesth, 1839), 'Malvina' (Pesth,
1851), ' The Avenger,' 'Melusine'; an oratorio,
' S. Boniface ' ; an overture to ' Uriel Acosta,' and
incidental music to various plays ; Concerto for
clarinet and orchestra ; and a concertante for
four clarinets and orchestra ; songs, PF. pieces
etc. The overture to ' Uriel Acosta ' was much
played in Germany, and was formerly often to
be heard at the Crystal Palace.
SCHINDLEE.
SCHINDLER, ANTON, the devoted friend and
biographer of Beethoven, was born in 1769 at
Modi, Neustadt, Moravia, where his father was
cantor and schoolmaster. He began the study of
music and the violin early in life. While quite
young he entered the Vienna University to study
law, and assiduously kept up his music by practice
in an amateur orchestra. His introduction to Bee
thoven took place accidentally in 1814, when he
was asked to take a note from Schuppanzigh to
the great composer. This was followed by a
ticket to Schuppanzigh's concert, at which Schin
dler was recognised by Beethoven. Later in the
year he played in Beethoven's two concerts of
Nov. 29 and Dec. 2 ; early in 1815 he accepted a
situation as teacher at Brunn, but being ques
tioned by the police on his acquaintances at
Vienna, and his papers not being in perfect
order, he was detained for some weeks, and had
to return to Vienna. Beethoven sent for him,
and conversed with him on the subject. They
met often, Schindler accompanied him in his
walks and the intimacy increased until, early in
1819, on the recommendation of Dr. Bach, he
became a kind of secretary to Beethoven, and at
length, in 1822, took up his residence in the
master's house. He then became conductor at
the Josephstadt Theatre, where he studied
several of Beethoven's great works under his
own direction. Beethoven, however, at last
began to tire of his young friend, and after much
unpleasantness, in 1824, after the failure of the
concert of May 23, the breach came. Beethoven
behaved with great violence and injustice, and
Schindler was driven from him till Dec. 1826,
•when he arrived in Vienna from Gneixendorf
to die. Schindler at once resumed his position,
attended him with devotion till his death, wrote
several betters to Moscheles on the details of
the event, and in company with Breuning took
charge of Beethoven's papers. Breuning died,
and then the whole came into Schindler's hands.
In 1831 he wrote some interesting articles on
Beethoven and Schubert in Bauerle's Theater-
zeitung. In December he left Vienna and became
capellrneister to the cathedral at Mtinster, a post
which he exchanged four years later for that
of music director at Aix-la-Chapelle. After some
years he relinquished this, became first a private
teacher and then went entirely into private life.
He lived in various towns of Germany, and at
length in Bockenheim, near Frankfort, where he
died Jan. 16, 1864.
His book on Beethoven was entitled ' Bio-
graphie von Ludwig van Beethoven. Mit dem
Portrat Beethoven's und zwei Facsimilen' (Miin
ster, 1840, i vol. 8vo).2 This was followed by
'Beethoven in Paris . . . ein Nachtrag zur Bio-
graphie Beethoven's' etc. (Miinster, 1842 ; i thin
vol. 8vo.) and that by a second edition of the
'Biographie' with additions (Miinster, 1845,
i vol. Svo.). The third, and last, edition appeared
1 Printed in Moscheles's Life, i. 145-179.
2 This is the book which was translated or adapted by Moscheles
(London, Oolburn, 1841), strange to say with no mention of Scb.iud.ler
on the title-page.
SCHIEA.
251
in 1860 — 'Dritte, neu bearbeitete und vermehrte
Auflage' (Miinster, 1860; in 2 vols.), with a
portrait and 2 facsimiles. Being so long about
Beethoven he accumulated many autographs and
other papers and articles of interest, and these
he disposed of to the library at Berlin for an
annuity. His sister was a singer, who in the
year 1830 was engaged at the Konigstadt
Theatre, Berlin.
Schindler has been the object of much obloquy
and mistrust, but it is satisfactory to know, on
the authority of Mr. Thayer, that this is un
founded, and that his honesty and intelligence
are both to be trusted. The article in which
this is set forth at length and conclusively,
arrived too late to be inserted here, but will be
printed in the Appendix. The well-known story
of his visiting card being engraved ' A. Schindler,
Ami de Beethoven,' turns out to be a mere
joke. [G.]
SCHIRA,3 FRANCESCO, long resident and es
teemed in London as composer, conductor, and
professor of singing, was born at Malta, Sept.
19, 1815, received his early education at Milan,*
and was placed at the age of nine (1824) in the
Conservatorio, where he learned counterpoint
under Easily, principal of that institution. At 1 7,
having completed his studies, Francisco was
commissioned to write an opera for the Scala,
which was produced Nov. 17, 1832. That 'Elena
e Malvina'5 won favourable recognition may be
inferred from the fact that a Lisbon impresario
being at Milan, with the object of forming a
company for the Santo Carlos, contracted an en
gagement with Schira for the forthcoming season
as ' Maestro Direttore, Compositore e Conduttore
della Musica.' He remained eight years in the
Portuguese capital, where he was also appointed
Professor of Harmony and Counterpoint at the
Conservatory, composing ' I Cavalieri di Valenza '
and 'II Fanatico per la Musica/ for the Santo
Carlos, besides ballets, cantatas, etc. During his
stay in Portugal he occasionally conducted operatic
performances at the Teatro della Citta di Oporto.
In January 1842 Schira quitted Lisbon for
Paris, with the idea of obtaining some book in
the French language which he might set to music.
In Paris he made the acquaintance of Mr. Mad-
dox, then in quest of artists for the Princess's
Theatre.6 This led to an offer from the London
manager, and Schira was appointed director of
music and orchestral chief at that establishment.
On Monday, Dec. 26, 1842, the Princess's opened
as a lyric theatre, and Schira's appearance at the
conductor's desk was his first introduction to the
English public. The opera chosen was an English
version of 'La Sonnambula,' the leading characters
sustained by Mine. Eugenie Garcia, Mme. Feron,
Mr. Templeton, Mr. Walton and Mr. Weiss;
3 The name is sometimes spelt Schirra.
< He was the youngest of four children, two of them sisters. The
•BiographieTJniverselle desMusiciens' makes Francesco die of cholera
at Lisbon ; but Pougin (' Supplement et Complement ') more correctly
attributes that fate to Vincenzo, the elder, whom Fe'tis does not
mention, confounding the two together as one.
s Pougin gives that opera to Vincenzo, but a printed copy of the
libretto (in our possession) states explicitly 'musica del maestro
Francesco Schira.'
6 Previously known as the Oxford Street Theatre.
252
SCHIRA.
Mr. Loder (father of Edward Loder) being prin
cipal violin. This was but the commencement
of a series of adaptations from foreign works,
diversified by novelties from indigenous pens.
Among notable incidents during Schira's term
of conductorship may be specified the memorable
debut of Anna Thillon in an English version of
Auber's 'Diamans de la Couronne' (May 1844),
that of Mile. Nau in 'La Sirene' (Nov. 1844),
and the production of two operas by Balfe, ori
ginally composed for the Paris Ope"ra Comique —
'Le Puits d'Amour,' rechristened 'Geraldine'
(Nov. 1843), and ' Les Quatre Fils d'Aymon,' re-
christened 'The Castle of Aymon' (Nov. 1844).
At the end of 1844 Schira accepted an engage
ment from Mr. Alfred Bunn, then lessee of Drury
Lane, to fill the place left vacant by Mr. (now
Sir Julius) Benedict, who resigned immediately
after Balfe's 'Daughter of St. Mark' was brought
out. At Drury Lane he remained until the spring
of 1847, when Mr. Bunn seceded from the manage
ment, the committee having entertained the
proposal of M. Jullien to become future lessee ;
and here several adaptations of foreign operas,
besides a good number of works by English com
posers, were produced. From the latter it will
suffice to name Wallace's ' Maritana' and 'Matilda
of Hungary,' Macfarren's 'Don Quixote,' Bene
dict's ' Crusaders,' Lavenu's ' Loretta ' (composed
for Mine. Anna Bishop), Balfe's ' Enchantress,'
etc. ; among the former, Flotow's ' Stradella ' and
' Martha.' In Sept. 1848 Mr. Bunn took Covent
Garden Theatre, and Schira was again appointed
conductor. The season only lasted two months,
but was not without interest. It comprised the
first theatrical engagement after his brilliant suc
cess, the year before, at Drury Lane, of Mr. Sims
Reeves, for whom an adaptation of Auber's
'HaydeV was produced, the great English tenor
assuming the part of Loredano ; another English
adaptation of Rossini's ' Donna del Lago ' ; and
an entirely new opera, called ' Quentin Durward,'
the composition of Mr. Henri Laurent. ' The
success of the enterprise was not in proportion
to the expectations of the manager ; ' Quentin
Durward' was by no means a hit, and though
Bunn had lowered his prices the house was pre
maturely closed. Thus an opera, entitled ' Kenil-
worth,' from Schira's own pen, which had already
been put into rehearsal, with Sims Reeves in the
part of Leicester, was lost to the public, and no
more English opera was heard at Covent Garden
until Miss Pyne and Mr. Harrison migrated from
the Lyceum, to carry on their undertaking in a
more spacious arena.
Although he had severed his connection with
the Princess's as musical director, in which
position his worthy successor was Mr. Edward
Loder, Schira wrote two original works for the
theatre in Oxford Street — 'Mina,' produced in
1849, and 'Theresa, or the Orphan of Geneva,' in
1850, both, the latter especially, received with
marked favour. The leading singers in 'Mina'
were Miss Louisa Pyne, Mme. Weiss, Messrs. W.
Harrison, Weiss and H. Corri ; in 'Theresa' Miss
Louisa Pyne, Messrs. Allen, Weiss, H. Corri,
SCHIRA.
and Wynn (brother of Mr. G. A. Sala, and a
humourist in his way). Mr. Bunn, however,
having once more become lessee of ' Old Drury,'
naturally looked back for his old and tried
adviser. Schira was once more engaged as con
ductor, with W. Lovell Phillips as chorus-master.
The theatre opened on Jan. 23, 1852, with an
English version of ' Robert le Diable,' succeeded
by 'Fra Diavolo,' with Mr. Sims Reeves (Brigand
Chief), and Miss Lucombe. The principal incident
that marked the season was the production of ' The
Sicilian Bride,' by Balfe, in no respect one of his
most successful efforts. From this time Schira
devoted himself specially to giving instructions
in the vocal art. He nevertheless did not neglect
composition, as testified in a number of charming
songs, duets, trios, etc., some of which have at
tained wide popularity. He also was busily
employed in the composition of a grand opera,
called 'Niccolb de' Lappi,' performed with marked
applause at Her Majesty's Theatre in May 1863.
For the Carnival at Naples, two years later, he
wrote another grand opera, entitled ' Selvaggia,'
which was given with brilliant success, and re
presented at Milan, Barcelona and elsewhere.
The reception accorded to ' Selvaggia ' led to his
being asked to write another opera, ' Lia,' for
Venice. This, also brought out during the
Carnival, was hardly so much to the taste of the
Venetians as its precursor. Nevertheless there
are amateurs who regard ' Lia ' as Schira's
capo di lavdro.
The managers of the Birmingham Festival
having commissioned Schira to write a cantata
for the meeting of 1873 the work was undertaken
with ready zeal, and performed under the com
poser's own direction on the evening of the first
day (Aug. 26). The cantata is entitled 'The
Lord of Bmieigh,' the libretto, by Mr. Desmond
Lumley Ryan, being founded upon the Laureate's
well-known poem, though not a line has been
appropriated from Tennyson, save the motto
which heads the title-page of the printed edi
tion. The piece was received with distinguished
favour, two numbers were encored, and the com
poser called back with unanimity to the platform.
Since then Schira has been almost silent as a
producer for the stage, the only exception being
an operetta, entitled 'The Ear-ring, 'performed at
the St. George's Hall Theatre. Anything like
a catalogue of his miscellaneous pieces would
occupy too much space. Enough that Francesco
Schira is a composer of the genuine Italian type;
Italian by birth he is also Italian by predilection
— a true child of the sunny land to which we owe
Piccinni, Cimarosa, Paisiello, Rossini, Bellini
and Verdi. His music, while revealing the hand
of one who has thoroughly mastered the prin
ciples of his art, is free from all pretence, relying
upon its unaffected simplicity and grace for the
impression it seldom fails to create. His most
important works having been referred to, a re
capitulation would be superfluous. As an in
structor in singing Schira has always maintained
a high position, many a public vocalist of note
having profited by his counsels. In his own
SCHIRA.
country and elsewhere abroad, he holds the in
signia of several orders of merit, the most prized
of which is that of ' Commendatore della Corona
d' Italia ' — prized the more because conferred by
King Humbert, motu proprio. [J.W.D.]
SCHIRMACHER, DORA, pianoforte player,
horn Sept. i, 1857, at Liverpool, where her
father is an esteemed professor of music ; early
developed an original talent, but was not regu
larly educated for music till later. At length,
after thorough instruction from her father, she
went in 1872 to the Conservatorium at Leipzig.
After passing with e"clat through the course, she
played at the Gewandhaus, Feb. i, 1877^ On
March 31 of the same year she made her de"but
in London at the Crystal Palace, and at the
Monday Popular Concert on Dec. 3. At both
these places she has played more than once since
those dates. In Liverpool, Manchester, and
other provincial English towns, and in Amster
dam, Leipzig, Frankfort, Stuttgart, and other
German places, she is often heard, and greatly
esteemed for her poetical rendering and her
varied repertoire. [G.]
SCHLADEBACH, JULIUS, born at Dresden,
1810, was brought up as a physician. In 1854
he projected a Universal Lexicon of Music, and
published a few numbers of it (Leipzig, 1855-)
after which it was completed by Bernsdorf. It
contains both music and musicians, and is to a
certain point an excellent work. [G.]
SCHLEIFER. See SLIDE.
SCHLEINITZ, CONRAD, Dr. juris, although
not a professional musician was, in the words of
Ferdinand 1Hiller, 'one of the most accomplished
of living amateurs,' and in any case deserves a
high place in a Dictionary of Music, since it was
in great measure through his discernment and
perseverance that the Gewandhaus Concerts at
Leipzig were put into Mendelssohn's hands, and
that the arrangements were maintained in such
efficiency, whereby an immense impetus was
given to orchestral music throughout Europe.
He was also greatly instrumental in the found
ation of the Conservatorium, of which he was
President for many years up to the time of his
death.
Dr. Schleinitz was born Oct. I, 1805, at Zasch-
witz in Saxony, and died in his house at Leipzig
on the morning of May 13, 1881. He was bred
to the law, took the degree of ' Dr. juris,' and is
always mentioned in the German papers as ' Heir
Advokat Schleinitz,' and it is shown from a
letter of Mendelssohn's (Aug. I, 1838) that his
business was at one time a good and improving
one. He appears to have been a good tenor
singer, and as such we find him among the solo
performers at the Festival at Halle in 1830 ; at
Leipzig on Good Friday 1835, and in Mendels
sohn's ' Elijah ' on the same day, 1848. We may
form some idea of the energy and intelligence of
his style as a singer, and his general know
ledge of music, from Mendelssohn's remarks on
1 F. Killer's 'Mendelssohn,' translated by Miss M. E. von Glehn,
p. 152.
SCHLESINGER.
253
the first performance of ' St. Paul ' in a letter to
him July 5, 1836.
His first communication with Mendelssohn as
to the concerts was very early in 1835. Men
delssohn's answer to it, and to a subsequent letter,
will be found in his printed Letters, under date
Jan. 26, and May 18 of the same year. His first
concert was on Oct. 4, 1835, and from that time till
his death, in 1847, the intercourse between him
and Schleinitz was never interrupted. Schleinitz
throughout those twelve years showed himself
always the thoughtful, devoted assistant of his
great friend, relieving him of anxiety as to the
business arrangements of the concerts, and
smoothing his path to the best of his ability.
That their intercourse did not stop there may be
gathered from an expression or two in Mendels
sohn's correspondence, and from the recollection
of those still living who were in Leipzig at that
time. The four printed letters bear no proportion
to the mass which were in Dr. Schleinitz's posses
sion, and which the writer was privileged to see
when collecting materials for the sketch of Men
delssohn in this Dictionary — some of which will
possibly be published. Mendelssohn dedicated
the Midsummer Night's Dream music to him,
and a book of 6 songs (op. 47) to his wife, and
Dr. Schleinitz was in possession of several more
or less important pieces of music of his still un
published. The 'Nachtlied' (op. 71, no. 6) was
composed and written for his birthday, Oct. i,
1847, and is therefore the last 2 work of the great
composer. Schleinitz was with his friend when he
died, and was one of the Committee for dealing
with his unpublished works. In the Allg. mus.
Zeitung of Dec. 27, 1848 (the last No. of the old
series) he published the statutes of a Mendelssohn
Fund, in connexion with the Conservatorium of
Leipzig, with a letter from the King approving
and authorising the scheme.
In his later years Dr. Schleinitz was nearly
blind, but this did not interfere with his devotion
to the Conservatorium and the Gewandhaus Con
certs, nor, as the writer is glad to mention, with
his eager kindness towards those who wished to
know about Mendelssohn.
He was a Knight of the Royal Saxon Order of
Merit. [G.]
SCHLESINGER. A well-known musical-
publishing house in Berlin. It was founded in
1795 by MARTIN ADOLPH SCHLESINGER, a man
of very original character and great ability.
Among the principal works issued by him is his
edition of the Great Passion music (Matthew) of
J. S. Bach, one of the fruits of Mendelssohn's
revival 3 of it, and an astonishingly bold under
taking for those days — which Schlesinger brought
out, according to his favourite expression, 'for
the honour of the house.' It was announced
in Sept. 1829, and published soon afterwards both
in Full and PF. score. He also founded the
Berliner Allg. mus. Zeitung, which under the
editorship of A. B. Marx had for 7 years (1824-
2 See vol. ii. p, 292, note 5.
3 March 11, 1829. See Marx's ' Erinnerungen,' ii. pp. 50, 87.
254
SCHLESINGER.
30) much influence for good in Germany. [See
vol. ii. 430.] He died in 1839.
His second son, HEINRICH (born 1807), carried
on the business till his death in 1879. He founded
the ' Echo' in 1851, a periodical which remained
in his hands till 1865,
The eldest son, MORITZ ADOLPH, left Berlin,
and in 1819 entered the bookselling house of
Bossan.oe pere at Paris. In 1823 he endeavoured
to found a similar business for himself. Police
difficulties prevented him from carrying out his
intention, and he founded a music business in
stead,, which for many years has had the lead
among French publishers, and is now nearly as
famous as Paris itself. He brought his German
tastes with him, and an unusual degree of en
terprise. His first serious effort was an edition of
Mozart's operas in PF. score, for which Horace
Vernet designed the titlepage. This was followed
by editions of the complete works of Beethoven,
Weber, Hummel, etc., and a ' Collection de chefs
d'ceuvre ' in 24 vols. He published also the full
scores of Meyerbeer's ' Robert,' and ' Les Hu
guenots '; HaleVy's 'L'EcIair,' ' La Juive,' 'Les
Mousquetaires,' ' La Heine de Chypre,' ' Guido
et Ginevra,' ' Charles VI ' ; Donizetti's ' La Fa
vorite ' ; Berlioz's ' Symphonic fantastique,' and
overture to the ' Carnaval Romain ' ; the ar
rangements of Wagner ; the chamber-music of
Onslow, Reissiger, and a host of other pieces
of all descriptions, for which the reader must be
referred to the catalogue of the firm. Amongst
the educational works the ' Me'thode des Me"-
thodes' is conspicuous. On Jan. 5, 1843, he
issued the first number of the 'Gazette Musicale,'
which in a few months was united to the ' Revue
Musicale,' and ran a useful and successful course
till its expiry in 1 88 1. [See vol. iii. 1216.] In
1846 M. Schlesinger sold the business to MM.
Brandus and Dufour, and retired to Baden Baden,
where he died in Feb. 1871. [G.]
SCHLOESSER, Louis, born at Darmstadt in
1800, learnt music there from Rinck, and in
Vienna from Seyfried, Salieri, and Mayseder. In
due time he entered the Conservatoire at Paris,
and attended the violin class of Kreutzer and
the composition class of Lesueur. He then went
to Darmstadt and became first leader and then
conductor of the Court band. His works com
prise 5 operas, a melodrama, music to Faust, a
mass, a ballet, and a quantity af instrumental
music of all descriptions. His son, CARL WILHELM
ADOLPH, was born at Darmstadt Feb. I, 1830.
He was educated by his father, and in 1847 esta
blished himself at Frankfort. In 1854 he went
to England, where he has been ever since settled
in London as an esteemed teacher.
He has published both in England and Ger
many a great number of PF. works, both solos
and duets ; including a suite dedicated to Cipriani
Potter, and a set of 24 studies ; many songs and
vocal pieces, including ' Merrily, merrily over the
snow' and an 'Ave Maria ' — and has many larger
works in MS. His ' Schumann Evenings ' were
well known, and did much to advance the know
ledge of Schumann in England. [G.]
SCHMITT.
SCHMID, ANTON, Custos of the Hofbibliothek
in Vienna, born at Pihl, near Leipa in Bohemia,
Jan. 30, 1787, entered the Imperial Library at
Vienna in 1818, became Scriptor in 1819, Custos
in 1844, and died at Salzburg, July 3, 1857.
His department as a writer was the history and
literature of music and hymns. He contributed
to the following works : — Dr. Ferdinand Wolf's
'Ueber die Lais, Sequenzen, und Leiche' (Heidel
berg, 1841) ; Becker's ' Darstellung der musikal-
ischen Literatur' (supplement, Leipzig, 1839);
A. Schmidt's ' Allg. Wiener musik. Zeitung '
(from 1842 to 48); Dehn's 'Cacilia' (from 1841
to 48 ; Mayence, Schott) ; and the ' Oesterreich.
Blatter fur Lit. und Kunst ' (1844, 45)- His in
dependent works are ' Ottaviano dei Petrucci of
Fossombrone, the inventor of moveable metal
types for printing music, and his successors'
(Vienna, Rohrmann, 1845) ; 'Joseph Haydn und
Nicolo Zingarelli,' proving that Haydn was the
author of the Austrian national hymn (Vienna,
Rohrmann, 1847); ' Christoph Willibald Ritter
von Gluck, his life and musical works. A bio
graphical sesthetical study (Leipzig, Fleischer,
1 854) ; also a work on chess, ' Tschaturanga-vidja'
(Vienna, Gerold, 1847).
Schmid was of a modest and retiring disposition,
and distinguished in his official capacity for con
scientiousness, industry, and courtesy. To him
in the first instance is due the orderly and sys
tematic arrangement of the musical archives of
the Hofbibliothek. In recognition of his un
wearied industry and research he was made a
member of the Historische Verein of Upper
Bavaria, of the Dom-Musikverein and the Mo-
zarteum of Salzburg, of the Congregazione ed
Accademia Pontifica di Santa Cecilia of Some,
of the Societa litteraria dell' Areopago of Genoa,
and of the Archaeological Societies of Vienna,
Nuremberg, etc. [C.F.P.]
SCHMITT, a German musical family. The
founder of it was Cantor at Obernburg in Bava
ria. His son ALOIS was born at Erlenbach on
the Main in 1789, and taught to play by his
father ; he then learned composition from Andre
of Offenbach, and in 1816 established himself in
Frankfort as a PF. teacher. After a few suc
cessful years there — during which, among others,
he had taught Ferdinand Hiller — and much tra
velling, he migrated to Berlin, then to Hanover,
where he held the post of Court Organist, and
lastly back to Frankfort, where he died July 25,
1866. His reputation as a teacher was great,
though he had a passion for journeys, and Ms
pupils complained of his frequent absences. He
composed more than 100 works, chiefly instru
mental, of all descriptions, including some useful
PF. studies.
His brother JAKOB, born at Obernburg Nov.
2, 1803, was a pupil of Alois. He settled in
Hamburg, where he brought out an opera
(Alfred the Great) and a prodigious amount of
music, including many sonatas for the piano,
solo and with violin, variations, three books of
studies, etc., in all more than 300 works; and
died June 1853.
SCHMITT.
The son of Alois, GEORG- ALOIS, was born
Feb. 2, 1827, during his father's residence at Han
over. Music came naturally to him, bub it was
not till after some time that he decided to follow
it. He was then at Heidelberg university, and
put himself under Vollweiler to serious study of
counterpoint. His first attempt was an operetta
called ' Trilby,' which was performed at Frank
fort in 1850, with great success. He then passed
some years in various towns of Germany, and at
length, in 1856, was called by Flotow to Schwerin
as Court-capellmeister, where he still resides.
In 1860 he visited London, and played with
6clat before the Queen, and elsewhere. He is
much valued through the whole of Mecklen
burg, and has kept up the reputation of his
family by writing a quantity of music of all
classes, from a Festival Cantata (Maienzauber)
downwards. Emma Brandes, now Mad. Engel-
mann, the eminent pianist, was his pupil. His
wife, CORNELIA SCHMITT, nee Csa"nyi, was born in
Hungary, Dec. 6, 1851. Her father took a main
part in the Revolution, and was imprisoned for 10
years, but the mother, finding remarkable gifts
for music in her daughters, found means to take
them to Vienna for their education. There
Cornelia learnt singing from Caroline Pruckner.
Engagements at Pressburg and Schwerin fol
lowed, and her marriage was the result. Since
then she has left the boards and taken to concert
singing. [G.]
SCHNEIDER, FRIEDRICH JOHANN CHRIS
TIAN, composer, teacher, and conductor, born
Jan. 3, 1786, at Alt-Waltersdorf, near Zittau,
composed a symphony as early as 10. In 1798
entered the Gymnasium of Zittau, and studied
music with Schonfelder, and linger. In 1804
he published 3 PF. sonatas, and having entered
the University of Leipzig in 1805 carried on his
musical studies to such purpose that in 1807 he
became organist of St. Paul's, in 1810 director
of the Seconda opera, and in 1812 organist of
St. Thomas's church. There he remained till
1821, when he became Capellmeister to the
Duke of Dessau, whose music he much improved,
and founded in the town a Singakademie, a school
master's choral society, and a Liedertafel. In
1829 he founded a musical Institute, which
succeeded well, and educated several excellent
musicians, Robert Franz among the number.
Schneider was also an industrious composer, his
works comprising oratorios — 'Das Weltgericht'
(1819), 'Verlorne Paradies' (1824), 'Pharao'
(1828), 'Christus das Kind,' and 'Gideon'
(1829), 'Getsemane und Golgotha' (1838); 14
masses; Glorias and Te Deums; 25 cantatas; 5
hymns; 13 psalms, 7 operas; 23 symphonies;
60 sonatas ; 6 c< mcertos ; 400 Lieder for men's
voices, and 200 ditto for a single voice — all now
forgotten except the men's part-songs. Schnei
der directed the musical festivals of Magdeburg
(1825), Nuremberg (1828), Strasburg (1830),
Halle (1830 and 35), Halberstadt (1830), Des
sau (1834), Wittenberg (1835), Coethen (1838
and 46), Coblenz and Hamburg (1840), Meissen
(1841), Zerbst (1844), and Liibeck (1847). He
SCHNEIDER.
255
also published didactic works — * Elementarbuch
der Harmonie und Tonsetzkunst ' (1820), trans
lated into English (London, (1828) ; ' Vorschule
der Musik ' (1827) ; and ' Handbuch des Organ-
isten' (1829-30). The oratorio of the 'Siind-
fluth' was translated into English as 'The Deluge'
by Professor E. Taylor, published in London
and probably performed at one of the Norwich
festivals.
Schneider was a doctor of music, and a member
of the Berlin and several other Academies. He
died Nov. 23, 1853. Some traits of his curious
jealous temper will be found in Schubring's
Reminiscences of Mendelssohn, in ' Daheim ' for
1866, No. 26. He was vexed with Mendelssohn
for his revival of Bach's Passion — but the feel
ing passed away ; and in the ' Signale' for 1866,
Nos. 46, 47, 48, there are eight letters (1829-45)
from Mendelssohn to him showing that they
were on very good terms. When Mendelssohn's
body passed through Dessau, on its way to
Berlin, Schneider met it at the station, with his
choir, and a lament was sung, which he had pur
posely composed, and which will be found in the
A.M.Z. for 1847, No. 48. [F.G.]
SCHNEIDER, JOHANN GOTTLOB, the cele
brated Dresden organist, brother of the preceding,
was born at Alt-gersdorf, Oct. 28, 1789. His
musical talent was manifest at the age of 5 years,
when he began to learn the organ, pianoforte,
violin, and some of the orchestral wind-instru
ments. His first master for organ was Unger, of
Zittau, and in his 22nd year he was appointed
organist to the University church at Leipzig.
From this period he seems to have aspired to
the highest rank as organ-player, and between
I Si 6 and 1820 gave many concerts in Saxony
and elsewhere, always being recognised as one
of the first organists of the day. At the Elbe
Musical Festival held at Magdeburg in 1825 he
played so finely as to receive shortly afterwards
the appointment of Court organist to the King
of Saxony, a post which he held with honour and
renown to his death in April 1864. Lovers of
music at Dresden will remember among the most
interesting and edifying of their experiences there
the grand extempore preludes to the opening
chorale at the principal Lutheran church, where
the great organist might be heard on Sunday
mornings. On those occasions that particular
form of improvisation which since the time of
Bach has been made a special study and feature
in Germany, and which is scarcely cultivated in
other countries, might be heard to the greatest
advantage. The instrument, one of Silbermann's,
though old-fashioned as to mechanism is of superb
tone, and is well placed in a gallery.1 As a player
of Bach, Schneider was perhaps the first authority
of his day, and he possessed a traditional reading
of the organ works of that sublime master, with
all of which he appeared to be acquainted. As
a teacher, it may be recorded of him (by one who
was his last pupil) that the elevation and nobility
of his style, the exclusion of everything derogatory
i For an interesting chapter onSchneider and his organ, see Chorley's
Mod. German Music, i. 320.
256
SCHNEIDER.
to the instrument, whether as regards composi
tion or performance, his care in never overlooking
an awkwardly fingered or pedalled passage, and
his reverence and enthusiasm for the great music
he delighted to teach, combined with other emi
nent qualities to place him in the foremost rank.
It was his much-appreciated custom to play any
composition by Bach which the pupil might ask
to hear after each lesson, which in itself was a
practice of priceless value as to inaccurately
printed passages, tempi, and registration of those
glorious works. Having given instruction to some
of the first organists of the day, Schneider could
relate interesting anecdotes of them and of many
great composers, including Mendelssohn, who was
one of his most devoted admirers. In the year
1 86 1, the fiftieth of Schneider's artistic career and
73rd of his birth, a remarkable testimony to his
powers was shewn in the presentation to him of a
' Jubel- Album fur die Orgel,' containing about
thirty original pieces, all in classical form, by
some of his best pupils, including Topfer, Van
Eyken, Faisst, Fink, Herzog, Merkel, E. F.
Eichter, Schellenberg, Liszt, A. G. Hitter, Schaab,
Hering, Naumann, Schurig, and Schutze (editor).
The subscribers were 750, and included the names
of the late king and royal family of Saxony.
Schneider's very few published works comprise
an ' answer of thanks ' to this collection, in the
form of a fugal treatment of ' Nun danket alle
Gott'; a Fantaisie and Fugue, op. i; Do. Do.
in D minor, op. 3 — a masterly work ; ' Twelve
easy pieces for use at divine service,' op. 4,
etc. etc. [H.S.O.]
SCHNYDER VON WARTENSEE, XAVIEB,
so called from his castle at the S.E. end of the
Lake of Constance, was born at Lucerne, of a
noble family, April 18, 1786. His career would
naturally have been one in accordance with his
rank, but the Revolution, and a strong inward
feeling, drove him in the direction of music. Until
1810 he had no teaching but what he could get
from books and practice. In that year he went
to Zurich, and then to Vienna, with the wish to
become a pupil of Beethoven. He was however
compelled to take lessons from Kienlen — perhaps
a better teacher than Beethoven would have been.
After a few years in the Austrian capital he
returned to Switzerland, made the campaign of
1815 against the French, then became teacher
in the Pestalozzian institute at Yverdun, and at
length in 1817 settled at Frankfort, and lived
there as teacher of composition and director of
various- musical institutions till his death, Aug.
30, 1868. During this latter period he was
much esteemed as a teacher, and had many
pupils, among them our countryman PEAESALL.
Schnyder appears to have been a man of ex
ceptional ability, but his life was too desultory to
admit of his leaving anything of permanent value,
and there was always a strong amateur element
about him. His compositions are numerous and
of all classes: an opera 'Fortunatus' (1829), an
oratorio for men's voices — both brought to perform -
ance, and the opera to publication; symphonies,
which were played in Frankfort ; solo and part-
SCHOBERLECHNER.
songs, etc. He wrote much, both poetry and prose,
and many of his articles on musical subjects were
contributed to the ' Allg. musik. Zeitung ' and
' Caecilia.' He was also a wit, and Hauptmann
has preserved one story which is worth repeating,
considering the date of its occurrence. After one
of the early performances of Tannhauser, Schnyder
wasasked his opinion. ' Well, said he, I put Wagner
above Goethe and Beethoven. Yes; he com
poses better than Goethe and writes verse better
that Beethoven.1 A romance and duet and a song
from Fortunatus are given in the A. M. Z. for
1832, and the former of the two is reprinted in
the Musical Library, iii. 133. They are both
melodious and well accompanied. [G.]
SCHOBER, FRANZ VON, an Austrian poet,
the youngest child of four, born at Torup, near
Malmoe, in Sweden, May 17, 1798. His mother
lost her fortune during the French occupation of
Hamburg — the same which drove the Mendels
sohn s to Berlin — and Franz had but a desultory
education. She returned to Austria, and he be
came tutor in the Festetics and Urmenyi and
other Hungarian families. He first knew Schu
bert as early as 1813, by meeting with some of
his songs at the house of Spaun ; he at once
made his personal acquaintance, and induced
Schubert to live with him for a few months, till
the return of Schober's brother. This was the
beginning of an intimacy which lasted till Schu
bert's death, and during the greater part of
which he had always his room in Schober's house.
The two, being so nearly of an age, became very
intimate ; Schober was devoted to him, and
Schubert set several of his poems to music,1
besides the libretto of 'Alfonso and Estrella.'
He was chief mourner at the funeral of his
friend in 1828. In 1843 we find him at Weimar
with Liszt, and in the service of the Grand Duke.
In 1856. he settled in Dresden for a few years;
in 1860 removed to Pesth ; in 1869 to Munich ;
and since then has lived in Gratz and other
places. His works embrace poems (8vo. 1842,
1865), and various occasional pamphlets. [&.]
SCHOBERLECHNER, FRANZ, born at
Vienna, July 21, 1797. Hummel composed for
him his 2nd Concerto, in C, which he performed
in public with success when only ten years old.
The precocious child was taken under the patron
age of Prince Esterhazy, and sent to Vienna, to
study under Forster. From 1814 he travelled
in Austria and Italy. While at Florence he
composed a requiem, and a buffo, opera, ' I Vir
tuosi teatrali.' In the next year, having been
appointed chapel-master to the Duchess of
Lucca, he wrote ' Gli Arabi nelle Gallie,' and
subsequently, at Vienna, in 1820, ' Der junge
Onkel.' In 1823 he went to Russia. He seems
to have written to Beethoven, before starting, for
letters of introduction. The maestro, however,
wrote across his letter, 'an active fellow requires
no other recommendation than from one respect
able family to another,' and gave it back to
1 Op. 16, No. 1 ; 23, No. 4 ; 88, No. 4 ; 96, No. 2 ; 102 ; 104 ; 108, No. 2;
109, Nos. 1, 2 ; 123 ; lief. 10, No. 6; IS, No. 1 ; 21, No. 2; 24, No.l;
' Trost im Liede.'
[F.A.M.J
SCHOBERLECHNER.
Schindler, who showed it to Schoberlechner, and,
no doubt at his desire, again urged Beethoven to
comply with the request. Beethoven however did
not know Schoberlechner, and had no very high
opinion of him, as he played chiefly bravura
pieces, and pompously paraded all his titles and
decorations, which gave occasion for many a
sarcastic remark from Beethoven.1
At St. Petersburg he recommended himself to
dall' Occa, a professor of singing, whose daughter
he married in 1824. After travelling in Germany
and Italy, the pair returned to St. Petersburg
in 1827, where Mme. Schoberlechner was en
gaged for three years at the Italian Opera at
a salary of 20,000 roubles. Her husband com
posed for her an opera, ' II Barone di Dolzheim,'
which had some success. After a few more
years wandering, Schoberlechner retired to a
country house near Florence. His last opera
was ' Rossane,' produced at Milan, Feb. 9, 1839.
He died at Berlin on Jan. 7, 1843.
His published works are chiefly for the piano
forte ; a list of them is to be found in Fetis's
'Biographic des Musiciens.' His wife,
Madame SOPHIE SCHOBERLECHNER, daughter
of Signor dall' Occa, as above stated, was born
at St. Petersburg in 1807. She was her father's
pupil, and married in 1824. Up to 1827 she
appeared only in concerts, but was then engaged
at the Italian Opera of St. Petersburg, as we
have also already mentioned. She had a very
beautiful voice, and for twelve or thirteen years
sang with unvarying success in almost all the
principal towns of Germany and Italy, but her
organ was too delicate for such constant usage,
It deteriorated early, and in 1840 she left the
stage, retired to her husband's property in Tus
cany, and died at Florence in 1863. [F.A.M.]
SCHOBERT— or CHOBERT in Mozart's or
thography2— a player on the harpsichord, whose
sonatas were the delight of our great-grand
mothers. His Christian name does not appear,
and little is known of his biography. He is
said to have been born and brought up at Strass-
burg. He settled in Paris before 1761, in which
year his first works were published there, where
he was in the service of the Prince de Oonti.
On the occasion of his death, Aug. 1767, Grimm,
no mean judge of music, inserts in his ' Corre-
spondance' a very high eutogium on his merits as
a player. He praises him for ' his great ability,
his brilliant and enchanting execution, and an
unequalled facility and clearness. He had not
the genius of our Eckard, who is undoubtedly
the first master in Paris ; but Schobert was
more universally liked than Eckard, because he
was always agreeable, and because it is not every
one who can feel the power of genius.' This is
the description of a pleasant brilliant player who
never soared above the heads of his audience.
He left 1 7 sonatas for PF. and violin ; 1 1 for
PF., violin and cello ; 3 quartets for PF., 2
violins and cello ; 6 ' sinfonies ' for PF., violin
and 2 horns ; 6 PF. concertos, and 4 books of
1 See Note to Beethoven's letters, translated by lady "Wallace,
tol. li. p. 118. 2 See letter, Oct. 17, 1777.
VOL. III. PT. 3.
SCHCELCHER.
257
sonatas for PF. solo.3 These seem to have been
originally published in Paris, but editions of
many of them appeared in London between 1770
and 1780. The particulars of his death are
given by Grimm. It was occasioned by eating
some fungi which he gathered near Paris, and
which killed his wife, his children, a friend, the
servant, and himself.* Schobert and Eckard
are alike forgotten by modern musicians. A
Minuetto and Allegro molto in Eb have been
reprinted in Pauer's 'Alte Meister,' other move
ments in the 'Maitres du Clavecin,' and a Sonata,
so-called, in the Musical Library. These pieces
are tuneful and graceful, but very slight in con
struction, the harmonies consisting chiefly of al
ternations of tonic and dominant, seldom in more
than three parts, often only in two. Burney
(Hist. iv. 591, 597) remarks that his music is
essentially harpsichord music, and that he was
one of the few composers who were not influenced
by Emanuel Bach. It is incredible that Fetis
can have discovered any likeness between Scho
bert and Mozart. [G.]
SCHGELCHER, VICTOR, French writer and
politician, son of a manufacturer of china, was
born in Paris, July 21, 1804, educated at the
College Louis le Grand, and well known as an
ultra-republican. On the accession of the Em
peror Napoleon III. he was expelled both from
France and Belgium, but took refuge in London,
where he brought out his ' Histoire des crimes
du 2 Ddcembre' (1853), and an English pamphlet
entitled ' Dangers to England of the Alliance
with the men of the Coup d'Etat' (1854).
Schcelcher remained in England till August
1870, returning to Paris immediately before the
Revolution of Sept. 4. As staff-colonel of the
Garde Nationale he commanded the Legion of
Artillery throughout the siege of Paris. After
Jan. 31, 1871, he was elected to the Assemblee
Nationale by the Department of the Seine, Mar
tinique, and Cayenne, and sat for Martinique till
elected a life-senator (Dec. 16, 1875).
His claim to a place in this work however is
as a distinguished amateur. His devotion to
art of all kinds was proved by his articles in
'L' Artiste' (1832), and 'La Revue de Paris'
(5833)' and he made during his travels a most
interesting collection of foreign musical instru
ments. His long stay in England had a still
more remarkable result in his enthusiasm for
Handel. Up to 1850 two or three detached
choruses from the ' Messiah * and ' Judas Macca
beus' were the only pieces of Handel's known
in Paris ; M. Schcelcher heard the fine perform
ances of entire oratorios which are native to
England, and at once resolved to do something
to remove this reproach from France. He accord
ingly made a collection of Handel's works, and
of books and pamphlets bearing on his life and
music, a list of which he gives in the beginning
of his book. Among them he was fortunate
enough to acquire the MS. copies of the scores of
the oratorios which had been used by Handel in
3 Weitzmann, ' Geschichte des Clavierspiels.*
* Grimm (new ed.) vii. 422.
S
258
SCHCELCHER.
conducting. To the autographs in Buckingham
Palace and the Fitzwilliam Museum at Cam
bridge, and to the copies by Smith now in pos
session of Mr. H. B. Lennard, he obtained
access, and thus provided, published 'The Life
of Handel, by Victor Schoelcher,' London,
Triibner, 8vo., 1857. The author was materially
assisted by Mr. Rophino Lacy,1 whose labours
are amply acknowledged in the preface (p. xxii).
The work was written by M. Schoelcher in French
and translated by Mr. James Lowe. ^ It con
tains much infonnation beyond what is indicated
in the title, especially with regard to Italian
opera and music in genera) in England during the
1 8th century. The French MS, 'Handel et son
temps,' was handed over to ' La France Musicale,'
which (Aug. 19, 1860) published the first four
chapters, and the beginning of the fifth (Nov.
2, 1862), but there broke off, doubtless for poli
tical reasons. The MS. was supposed to have
been destroyed, till May 25, 1881, when it was
offered for sale by M. Charavay, and at once
bought for the library of the Conservatoire, thus
completing M. Schcelcher's magnificent gift
(Nov. 1872) of all the works, in, print or MS,
used by him in preparing the book, and his col
lection of foreign instruments. He has since
added a quantity of music and rare books bearing
on the history of Italian opera in London, and
on singing and pianoforte-playing in the United
Kingdom. The ' Fonds Schcelcher,' as it is called,
contains in all 500 volumes uniformly bound with
the initials of the donor, and has already been of
immense service to French artists and music
ologists, whose knowledge of the madrig;»l writers
and pianists of the English school, and indeed of
Handel himself, is as a rule but imperfect. [G. C.]
M. Schcelcher's work, though the only modern
English biography of Handel, is very inadequate
to its purpose. The author was no musician, and
was therefore compelled to depend on the labours
and judgment of another. His verdicts are de
formed by violent and often ludicrous partisan
ship ; and his style, which is extremely French,
has had but small assistance from his trans
lator.2 No man can write a serious book on a
great subject without its being of some value,
and Mr. Schoelcher's dates and lists are alone
enough to make the student grateful to him;
but it is to be hoped that before long some one
may be found to produce a life of Handel which
shall steer midway between the too detailed
compilation of Dr. Chrysander and the curious
farrago of the French Republican senator. It
is a great pity that M. Schoelcher's original
French work is not published. [G.]
SCHONSTEIN, CARL, BARON VON (son of
Baron Franz Xaver, who died in 1825), was born
June 26, 1797, was Imperial Chamberlain arid
Ministerial Councillor, was twice married, re-
1 M. Schcelcher's statement as to Mr. Lacy's assistance should
materially modify our inferences from his account of his own part in
the examination of Handel's MSS.. p. xxi.
2 Who did not do his work well. Instead of modifying the
natural over-exuberance of the author he has rather exaggerated it,
and has allowed a number of sentences to pass which no literary man
of any pretension should have written.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
tired on his pension in 1867, and died July 19,
1876. Schb'nstein was one of the Esterhazy
circle in the time of Franz Schubert, and was
noted as being at that time, with the single ex
ception of Vogl, the finest singer of Schubert's
songs. He had, says Kreissle, like Vogl, a spe
cial set of songs which exactly suited his voice,
such as the ' Schb'ne Miillerin ' — dedicated to
him — ' Standchen/ ' Der ziirnenden Diana,' etc. ;
while Vogl was more attached to the dramatic
and expressive 'Winterreise,' ' Zwerg,' etc.
Schbnstein's position in society enabled him to
introduce Schubert's music into the highest
circles. In 1838 Liszt heard him in Vienna, and
wrote as follows to the 'Gazette Musicale':— 'In
the salons here I have often heard Schubert's
songs given by the Baron Schonstein, always with
the liveliest pleasure, and often with an emotion
which moved me to tears. The French version
gives but a very poor idea of the manner in
which Schubert, the most poetical musician that
ever lived, has united his music to the words of
these poems, which are often extremely beautiful.
The German language is admirable for sentiment,
and it is all but impossible for any one not a Ger
man to enter into the naivete' and fancy of many
of these compositions, their capricious charm, their
depth of melancholy. The Baron gives them with
the declamatory science of a great artist, and the
simple feeling of an amateur who thinks only of
his own emotions and forgets the public.' [G.]
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. In Music,
as in other Arts, the power of invention, even
when displayed in its most original form,
has a never-failing tendency to run in certain
recognised channels, the study of which enables
the technical historian to separate its mani
festations into more or less extensive groups,
called Schools, the limits of which are as clearly
defined as those of the well-known Schools of
Painting, or of Sculpture. These Schools natu
rally arrange themselves in two distinct Classes;
the first of which embraces the works of the
Polyphonic Composers of the I4th, r5th, and
1 6th centuries, written for Voices alone ; the
second, those of Composers of later date, written,
either for Instruments alone, or for Voices
supported by Instrumental Accompaniments.
The critical year, i6co, separates the two classes
so distinctly, that it may fairly be said to have
witnessed the destruction of the one, and the
birth of the other. It is true that some fifty
years or more elapsed, before the traditions of
the earlier style became entirely extinct ; but
their survival was rather the result of skilful
nursing, than of healthful reproductive energy;
while the newer method, when once fairly
launched upon its career, kept the gradual de
velopment of its limitless resources steadily in
view, with a persistency which has not only
continued unabated to the present day, but may
possibly lead to the accomplishment, in future
ages, of results far greater than any that have
been yet attained.
The number of distinct Schools into which
these two grand Classes may be subdivided is
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 259
very great — so much too great for detailed criti
cism, that we must content ourselves with a
brief notice of those only which have exercised
the most important influence upon Art in general.
In making a selection of these, we have been
guided, before all things, by the principles of
aesthetic analogy, though neither local nor chro
nological coincidences have been overlooked, or
could possibly have been overlooked, in the con
struction of the following scheme, in accordance
with which we propose to arrange the order of
our leading divisions.
CLASS I. THE POLYPHONIC SCHOOLS.
I. The First Flemish School (1370— 1430\
II. The Second Flemish School (1430—1480).
III. The Third Flemish School (1480-15iO).
IV. The Fourth Flemish School (1520-1590).
V. The Early Roman School (1517—1565).
VI. The Later Roman School (1565—1594),
VII. The Venetian School (1527—1609).
VIII. The Early Florentine School (circa 1539- 1600) .
IX. The Schools of Lombardy (circa 1500—1600).
X. The EarlyNeapolitan School (circa 1434-1600),
XI. The School of Bologna (circa 1500—1600).
XII. The German Polyphonic Schools (1480—1568).
XIII. The Schools of Munich and Nuremberg (1557—
1612).
XTV. The Early French School (circa 1500—1572).
XV. The Spanish School (1.540—1605).
XVI. The Early English Schools (1226-1625).
XVII. The Schools of the Decadence (1600, et seq.}.
CLASS II. THE MONODIC, DRAMATIC, AND
INSTRUMENTAL SCHOOLS.
XVIII. The Monodic School of Florence (1597—1600).
XIX. The School of Mantua (1607—1613).
XX. The Venetian Dramatic School (1637—1700).
XXI. The Neapolitan School of the 17th century
(1659—1725),
XXII. The German Schools of the 17th century
(1620—1700).
XXIII. The French School of the 17th century (1650—
1687).
XXIV. The English School of the 17th century (7660—
17CO), including that of the Restoration,
XXV. The Italian Schools of the 18th century (circa
1700—1800).
XXVI. The German Schools of the 18th century
(circa 1700—1800).
XXVII. The School of Vienna (1750-1828).
XXVIII. The French School of the 18th century (circa
1700—1800).
XXIX. The English School of the 18th century
(circa 1700— 1800).
XXX. The Modern German School (1800, et seq.).
XXXI. The Romantic School (1821, et seq.}.
XXXII. The Modern Italian School (1800, et seq.}.
XXXIII. The Modern French School (1800, et seq.).
XXXIV. The Modern English School (1800, et seq.).
XXXV. The Schools of the Future.
I. The Art of Composition was long supposed
to have owed its origin to the intense love of
Music which prevailed in the Low Countries,
during the latter half of the I4th century. The
researches of modern criticism have proved this
hypothesis to be groundless, so far as its leading
proposition is concerned : yet, it contains so much
collateral truth, that, while awaiting the results
of farther investigation, we are still justified in
representing Flanders as the country whence the
cultivation of Polyphony was first disseminated
to other lands. If the Netherlanders were not the
earliest Composers, they were, at least, the first
Musicians who taught the rest of Europe how to
compose. And, with this certain fact before us,
we have no hesitation in speaking of THE FIRST
FLEMISH SCHOOL as the earliest manifestation of
creative genius which can be proved to have ex
ercised a lasting influence upon the history of Art.
The force of this assertion is in no wise invalidated
by the strong probability that the Faux-bourdon
was first sung in France, and exported thence, at
a very early period, to Italy. For the primitive
Faux-bourdon, though it indicated an immense ad
vance in the practice of Harmony, was, technically
considered, no more than a highly -refined develop
ment of the extempore Organum, or Discant, of
the nth and I2th centuries, and bore very little
relation to the true ' Cantus super librum,' to
which, alone, the term Composition can be logi
cally applied. We owe, indeed, a deep debt of
gratitude to the Organizers, and Discanters, by
whom it was invented ; for, without the mate
rials accumulated by their ingenuity and patience,
later Composers could have done nothing. They
first discovered the harmonic combinations which
have been claimed, as common property, by all
succeeding Schools. The misfortune was that
with the discovery their efforts ceased. Of sym
metrical arrangement, based upon the lines of a
preconceived design, they had no idea. Their
highest aspirations extended no farther than the
enrichment of a given Melody with such Har
monies as they were able to improvise at a
moment's notice: whereas Composition, properly
so called, depends, for its existence, upon the
invention — or, at least, the selection — of a de
finite musical idea, which the genius of the Com
poser presents, now in one form, and now in
another, until the exhaustive discussion of its
various aspects produces a work of Art, as con
sistent, in its integrity, as the conduct of a
Scholastic Thesis, or a Dramatic Poem. Upon
this plan, the Flemish Composers formed their
style. They delighted in selecting their themes
from the popular Ditties of the period — little
Volkslieder, familiar to men of all ranks, and
dear to the hearts of all. These they developed,
either into Saecular Chansons for three or more
Voices, or into Masses and Motets of the most
solemn and exalted character ; with no more
thought of irreverence, in the latter case, than
the Painter felt, when he depicted Our Lady,
resting, during her Flight into yEgypt, amidst the
familiar surroundings of a Flemish hostelry. At
this period, representing the Infancy of Art, the
Subject, or Canto fermo, was almost invariably
placed in the Tenor, and sung ia long- sustained
notes, while two or more supplementary Voices
accompanied it with an elaborate Counterpoint,
written, like the Canto fermo itself, in one or
other of the antient Ecclesiastical Modes, and
consisting of Fugal Passages, Points of Imi
tation, or even Canons, all suggested by the
primary idea, and all working together for a com
mon end. This was Composition, in the fullest
sense of the word; and, as the truth of the
principle upon which it was based has never yet
been disputed, the Musicians who so successfully
S2
260 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
practised it are entitled to our thanks for the
cultivation of a mode of treatment the technical
value of which is still universally acknowledged.
The reputed Founder of the School, and un
questionably its greatest Master, was Gulielmus
Dufay, a native of Chimay, in Hennegau, who,
after successfully practising his Art in his own
country, and probably also at Avignon, carried
it eventually to Koine, where, in 1380, he ob
tained an appointment in the Papal Choir, and
where he appears to have died, at an advanced
age, in 1432, leaving behind him a goodly num
ber of disciples, well worthy of so talented a
leader. The most eminent of these were, Egy-
dius Bianchoys, Vincenz Faugues, Egyd Flannel
(called L'Enfant), Jean Redois, Jean de Curte
(called L'Ami), Jakob Kagot, Eloy, Brasart, and
others, many of whom sang in the Papal Chapel,
and did their best to encourage the practice of
their Art in Italy. A valuable collection of the
works of these early Masters is preserved among
the Archives of the Sistine Chapel, but very few
are to be found elsewhere,1 with the exception of
some interesting fragments printed by Kiese-
wetter, Ambros, Coussemaker, and some other
writers on the History of Music. The following
passage from Dufay's 'Missa 1'omme arme" — one
of the greatest treasures in the Sistine Collection
— will serve to exemplify the "remarks we have
made upon the general style of the period.
f\ T ( \ f~~~ *
"^J ~~*
s-_J
f--J s^2
c/ c^
IVnor, Canto Ferm
' Vomme
3.
arm^.'
1
„,
^•^ .
-**^ « v J
i
1
If
^
!l 1 1
i
-
/T3 <^
^J ^ 1
i j 223T2
.^'
S ^J <=•• J
J^t c-1
•gp- ^: -p- f^'TT
s «
^.
1 (I 1 h>
IP .22. etc.
~K~3 £•** —
• *
C7
II. The system thus originated was still more
fully developed in THE SECOND FLEMISH SCHOOL,
under the bold leadership of Joannes Okenheim
(or Ockeghem), of whom we first hear, as a
member of the Cathedral Choir at Antwerp,
in the year 1443. Okenheim's style, like that
of his fellow -labourers, Antoine Busnoys,2 Jakob
Hobrecht, Philipp Basiron, Jean Cousin, Jacob
Barbireau, Erasmus Lapicida, Antoine and
Robert de Fevin, Firmin Caron, Joannes Regis,
and others, of nearly equal celebrity, was more
elaborate, by far, than that of either Dufay
himself, or the most ambitious of his colleagues ;
1 Six of Dufay's Masses are, however, preserved in theKoyal library
8,t Brussels; and the 'Gloria' of another, at Cambray. Rochlitz
has printed the ' Eyrie ' from his Mass ' Si la face ay pale ' in vol. i. of
the ' Sammlung vorzuglichsten Gesangstiicke.'
2 Baini places Busnnys among the Masters of the early School.
Kiesewetter regards him, with Hobrecht, and Caron, as belonging
to a transitional epoch. Ambros describes him as the leader of a
distinct School, interposed between those of Dufay and Okenheim.
We do not think that the amount of influence he exercised upon Art
justifies this last-named arrangement.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
and there is little doubt that the industry of
these pioneers of Art assisted, materially, in
preparing the way for the splendid creations of
a later epoch. The ingenuity displayed by the
leader of the School in the construction of Canons
and Imitations of every conceivable kind, led to
the extensive adoption of his method of working
by all who were sufficiently advanced to enter
into rivalry with him ; and, for many years,
no other style was tolerated. He, however,
maintained his supremacy to the last ; and if,
in his desire to astonish, he sometimes forgot
the higher aims of Art, he at least bequeathed
to his successors an amount of technical skill
which enabled them to overcome with ease many
difficulties, which, without such a leader, would
have been insurmountable. The greater num
ber of his Compositions still remain in MS.,
among the Archives of the Pontifical Chapel, in
the Brussels Library, and in other collections ;
but some curious examples are preserved in
Petrucci's ' Odhecaton,' and ' Canti C. No. cento
cinquanta,' and in the ' Dodecachordon ' of
Glareanus; while others, in modern notation,
will be found in Burney, vol. ii. pp. 474-479, in
vol. i. of Rochlitz's * Sammlung vorziiglichen Ge-
sangstiicke,' and in the Appendix now in course
of publication, by Otto Kade, in continuation of
Ambros' s ' Geschichte der Musik.'
III. To Okenheim was granted the rare
privilege, not only of bringing his own School to
perfection, but also of educating the orginator of
another, which was destined to exercise a still
stronger influence upon the future of Polyphony.
In his famous disciple, Josquin des Pre"s, he
left behind him a successor, no less learned and
ingenious than himself, and infinitely richer in
all those great and incommunicable gifts which
form the distinguishing characteristics of true
genius. All that one man could teach another,
he taught the quondam Chorister of S. Quentin ;
but a comparison of the works of the two Com
posers will clearly show, that the technical per
fection beyond which the teacher never dreamed
of penetrating was altogether insufficient to
satisfy the aspirations of the pupil, in whose
Music we first find traces of a desire to please
the ear, as well as the understanding. It is the
presence of this desire, joined with improved
symmetry of form, and increased freedom of
development, which distinguishes THE THIBD
FLEMISH SCHOOL, of which Josquin was the life
and soul, from its ruder predecessors. This was
the first School in which any serious attempt was
made to use learning as a means of producing
harmonious effect ; and it was rich in Masters,
who, however great their inferiority to their un
approachable leader, caught not a little of his fire.
Pierre de la Hue (Petrus Platensis), Antonius
Brumel, Alexander Agricola, Loyset Compere,
Johann Ghiselin, Du Jardin (Ital. De Orto),
Matthaus Pipelare, Nicolaus Craen, and Johann
J apart, though the greatest, were by no means
the only great writers of the age ; and the list of
less celebrated names is interminable. The
works of these Masters, though not easily
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 261
accessible to the general reader, are well repre
sented in the 'Dodecachordon.' Petrucci, too,
has printed three entire volumes of Josquin's
Masses, besides many others by contemporary
writers ; and the same publisher's ' Odhecaton,'
and 'Canti B. and C.' contain a splendid collec
tion of saecular Chansons by all the best Com
posers of the period. The most important
example, in modern Notation, is Choron's re
print of Josquin's ' Stabat Mater,' the general
style of which is well shown in the following
brief extract.1
MODUS XIII (vel XI) Transp.2
do - lo • TO • sa,
*
^
Sta - bat ma - ter
a - bat
Canto Fermo.
Sta
bat
ma
^
££
I j
*=*£
Sta - bat ma - ter do - lo - - to - - - -
Jux-
r
--Z&
ma
£t
- - - ter
do - lo - ro - sa. Jus - ta cru-
•
!
^1
ta era - cem la - cry - mo -
sa
- cem la - cry - - mo - - sa
etc.
etc.
m
^&-\-& — G> — «
I >-—->— - -•
la - cry - - mo - - sa.
cem
IV. The style of THE FOURTH FLEMISH
SCHOOL presents a strong contrast to that of its
predecessor. The earlier decads of the i6th
century did, indeed, produce many writers, who
slavishly imitated the ingenuity of Josquin, in
utter ignorance of the real secret of his strength ;
but the best Masters of the time, finding it
impossible to compete with him upon his own
1 Performed by the ' Gluck Society ' on May 24, 1881 ; and reprinted
In the ' N< tenbeilagen ' to Ambros's ' Geschichte.'
2 Zarlino quotes this Composition as an example of the Eleventh
Mode ; the Ionian, and Hypoionian Modes being numbered, in his
system, XI, and XII, instead of XIII and XIV. [See vol. ii. p. 342 a.]
Pietro Aron, ignoring the Transposition, and evidently regarding the
Bb as an often-recurring Accidental, speaks of the work as being
written in the Fifth Mode. The Student of Antient Music will at
once understand that this divergence of opinion involves no theoreti
cal incongruity.
ground, struck out an entirely new manner, the
chief characteristic of which was, extreme sim
plicity of intention, combined with a greater
purity of Harmony than had yet been attempted,
and a freedom of melody which lent a fresh
charm, both to the Ecclesiastical and the Saecular
Music of the period. The greatest Masters of
this School were, Nicolaus Gombert, Cornelius
Canis, Philippus de Monte, Jacobus de Kerle,
Clemens non Papa ; the great Madrigal writers,
P hilipp Verdelot, Giach es de Wert, Huber to Wael-
rant, and Jacques Archadelt; Adrian Willaert,
the Flemish Founder of the Venetian School ; and
the last great genius of the Netherlands, Roland
de Lattre (Orlando di Lasso), of whose work we
shall have occasion to speak at a later period. To
these industrious Netherlanders the outer world
was even more deeply indebted than to those of
the preceding century, for its knowledge of the
Art, which, so well nurtured in the Low Coun
tries, spread thence to every Capital in Europe;
and it is chiefly by the peculiar richness of their
otherwise unpretending Harmonies that their
works are distinguished from those of earlier
date — a characteristic which is well illustrated in
the following example, from Philippus de Monte's
' Missa, Mon cueur se recommande a vous,' and
to which we call special attention, as we shall fre
quently have occasion to refer to it, hereafter, in
tracing the relationship between cognate schools.
-/TTj' [
— ^ ^-" ~^--i -^-i
— (»-{=:
-&-&-
I7\\ I
/ M
r*-> C-S-—
, s
VMJ '
«
\<~2
' i~^ U£5-, •
W Jj-
^•r
t/
0-
| l|" "If-* |f=*
san-na in ex - eel
i1*^ "-^-1
- sis.
l*r~
* V
'•> (
4
i
I
^ U I
J
^P
,J , -ey - 1
^ —
J-
\ 1 1
— &=— H —
— '-£*>.
— '"^ — ' ^s' —
_J
^j!'* n'. •
B
— _ -. *—<&
:
That the style we have described was the
result of a reaction, neither unhealthy in its
nature, nor revolutionary in its tendency, though
not altogether free from violence, there can be
no doubt. Singers were growing weary of the
conundrums which had so long been offered to
them as substitutes for the truer Music which
alone can reach the heart. In the hands of
Josquin, these puzzles had never lacked the
impress of true genius. In those of his imitators,
they were as dry as dust. With him, the
solution of the senigma led always to some
harmonious result ; while they were perfectly
262 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
satisfied, provided no rules were unnecessarily
broken. The best men of the period, fully alive
to the importance of this distinction, aimed at
the harmonious effect, and succeeded in attaining
it, without the intervention of the conundrum.
And thus arose a School, so simple in its con
struction, that more than one modern ^cri tic has
accused its leaders of poverty of invention. The
injustice of this charge is palpable; for when it
answered the purpose of these Composers to write
in a more learned manner, they invariably found
themselves equal to the occasion, though they
cared nothing for ingenuity for its own sake.
And the result of their spirit of self-control is,
that though their Church Music may be deficient
in the breadth and grandeur which were attained,
at a later period, in Italy, their Madrigals are
among the finest in the world.
Beyond this point, Art made no great ad
vance in Flanders. We must seek for the traces
of its farther progress in Italy. [See POLY-
PHONIA; MASS; MADRIGAL; JOSQOIN; OBRECHT;
OKEGHEM; etc. etc.]
V. The formation of THE EARLY ROMAN
SCHOOL was one of the most important, as
well as the most obviously natural results of
the employment of Flemish Musicians in the
Pontifical Chapel. It was not, however, until
many years after the return of the Papal Court
from Avignon, that Italian Composers were
able to hold their ground successfully against
their foreign rivals. When they did begin to do
so, the style they most affected was so strongly
influenced by that then prevalent in the Nether
lands, that it is not always easy to distinguish
works of the one School from those of the other,
as a comparison of the following passage from
Costanzo Festa's Madrigal, 'Quando ritrovo la
mia pastorella,' l with the opening of Archadelt's
' Vaghi pensier,'2 will sufficiently demonstrate.
COSTANZO FESTA. (Venice 1541.)
Quan -do ri - tro - - TO- la mi - a pas - to -
rel - la,
At
pra - to con le pe - cor"
1 Though this is, probably, the best-known Madrigal in the world,
we are unable to find any printed edition, of later date than the 16th
century, to which we can refer, in illustration of our remarks. The
popular English translation is irreproachable, so far as the verses are
concerned ; but. the Music is so much altered, to accommodate
them, that its rhythm is scarcely recognisable. We therefore give
a few of the opening bars, as they stand in the original ; referring
the reader, for the remainder, to Dr. Burney's MS. Score, in the
British Museum. Compare the extract also with the example from
Archadelt's 'II bianco e dolce cigno,' given in vol. ii. pp. 188:9.
2 This Madrigal will also be found in Archadelt's Third Bo.k.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
In pas - tu - ra, lo mi gli ac-cos t 'e pres - to la sa -
»- i^-^i r r -p-pr
- lu - to,
La mi ris - pon - de, tu sia ben ve -
— |- r ! 1 — i : — '•^-i
&
F?
t
ffcf^F
JACQUES ARCHADELT. (Venice 1541.)
Va - ghi pen - sier che co - si
pas - 1 so
pas - so, che co - si pas - so pas
Scor - to m'ha - ve - te ra - gio - nar'
In the distribution of their Vocal Parts, the
massive weight of their Harmonies, the persistent
crossing of the Melodies by which those Har
monies are produced, the bright swing of their
Rhythm, and other similar technicalities, these
two examples resemble each other so closely,
that, had they been printed anonymously, no one
would ever have supposed that they could pos
sibly have belonged to different Schools. The
secret is explained by their simultaneous publi
cation in Venice. The Netherlander had long
found a ready market for their Art Treasures, in
Italy. The Italians had, by this time, learned
how to produce similar treasures for themselves ;
and Costanzo Festa's talent placed his works at
least on a level with those of his instructors, if not
above them. His genius was incontestable : he
was equally remarkable for his power of adaptation.
Though by no means wanting, either in learning,
or ingenuity, he here shows himself willing to
reduce his Madrigal to the simplicity of a Faux-
bourdon, in order to secure the harmonic richness
so highly prized at this particular epoch. He did
so, constantly, and always with success ; for, to
the purity of style cultivated by the best of his
contemporaries in the North of Europe, Festa
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
added a Southern grace, which has gained him
a high place among the Masters of early Italian
Art. He had, indeed, but few rivals among his
own countrymen. With the exception of Gio
vanni Animuccia, and some few Italian writers
of lesser note, nearly all the best Composers
for the great Roman Choirs, at thi* period, were
Spaniards. Among these, we find the names of
Bartolommeo Escobedo, Francesco Salinas, Juan
Scribano, Cristofano Morales, Francesco Guer
rero, Didaco Ortiz, and Francesco Soto — all
Masters of the highest rank, of whom, notwith
standing their close imitation of Flemish models,
we shall have occasion to speak again, when
treating of the Spanish School ; though none of
them were so worthy as Festa himself to sustain
the honour of this most interesting phase of
artistic development — the first in which his coun
try asserted her claim to special notice.
VI. Italy was once represented, by general
consent, as the birthplace of all the Arts. We
have shown, that, with regard to Polyphony, this
was certainly not the Ccise. We are now, however,
approaching a period in which she undoubtedly
took the lead, and kept it. The middle of the
1 6th century witnessed a rapid advance towards
perfection, in many centres of technical activity;
but the triumphs of this, and all preceding epochs,
were destined, ere long, to be entirely forgotten
in those of THE LATER ROMAN SCHOOL.
We have seen Polyphonic Art nurtured, in
its infancy, by the protecting care of Dufay; in
its childhood, by that of Okenheim ; in the
bright years of its promising adolescence, by the
stronger support of Josquin, and of Festa. We
are now to study it, in its full maturity, en
riched by the genius of one, compared with whom
all these were but as experimenters, groping in
the dark. The train of events which led to the
recognition of the School justly held to repre-
se.nt ' The Golden Age of Art ' has already been
discussed, at some length, 1elsewhere; but it is
necessary that we should refer to it again, in
order to render the sequence of our narrative
intelligible to the general reader. We have
shown that the process of technical development
which was gradually bringing the Motet and
the Madrigal to absolute perfection of outward
form, had never been interrupted. Unhappily,
the spirit which should have prompted the Com
poser of the 1 6th century to draw the necessary
line of demarcation between Ecclesiastical and
Ssecular Music, and to render the former as
worthy as possible of the purpose for which it
was intended, attracted far less attention than
the advantage to be derived from structural
improvement. Among the successors of Josquin,
there were many cold imitators of his mechanism,
who, as we have already shown, were totally
unable to comprehend the true greatness of his
style. By these soulless pedants — more nume
rous, by far, than their more earnest contem
poraries — the Music of the Mass was degraded
into a mere learned conundrum ; enlivened, con
stantly, by the introduction, not only of secular
i See Tol. ii. pp. 22»-9.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 263
subjects, but of profane words also. Other
practices, equally vicious and equally irreverent,
were gradually bringing even the primary in
tention of Religious Art into disrepute. For,
surely, if Church Music be not so conceived as
to assist in producing devotional feeling, it must
be something very much worse than worthless :
and, to suppose that any feeling, other than
that of hopeless bewilderment, could possibly
be produced by a Mass, or Motet, exhibiting a
laboured Canon, worked out, upon a long-drawn
Canto fer mo, by four or more Voices, all singing
different sets of words entirely unconnected
with each other, would be simply absurd. The
Council of Trent, dreading the scandal which
such a style of Music must necessarily introduce
into the public Services of the Church, decided
that it would be desirable to interdict the use of
Polyphony altogether, rather than suffer the abuse
to continue. And the prohibition would actually
have been carried into effect, had not Palestrina
saved the Art he practised, by showing, in the
' Missa Papse Marcelli/how learning as profound
as that of Okenheim or Josquin, might be com
bined with a greater amount of devotional feeling
than had ever before been expressed by a Choir
of human Voices. It was this great Mass which
inaugurated the later Roman School ; and the
year 1565, in which it was produced, has always
been regarded as marking a most important
crisis in the history of Art, a crisis which it
behoves us to consider very carefully, since its
nature has generally been discussed, either so
superficially as to give the enquiring student no
idea whatever of its distinctive character, or with
blind adherence to a foregone conclusion equally
fatal to the just appreciation of its import.
A century ago, the genius of Palestrina was
very imperfectly understood. The spirit of the
cinquecentisti no longer animated even the best
Composers for the Church ; and modern criticism
had not, as yet, made any attempt to bring itself
en rapport with it. Hawkins, less trustworthy
as a critic than as an historian, tells us, that the
great Composer ' formed a style, so simple, so
pathetic, and withal so truly sublime, that his
Compositions for the Church are even at this day
looked upon as the models of harmonical perfec
tion.1 It is quite true that his style is 'truly
sublime/ and, where deep feeling is needed, un
utterably ' pathetic' : but, though it may appear
' simple ' to the uninitiated, it is really so learned
and ingenious that it needs a highly accom
plished contrapuntist to unravel its complications.
Burney, though generally no less remarkable for
the fairness of his criticism, than for the inde
fatigable perseverance with which he collected
the evidence whereon it rests, tells us, in like
manner, that the ' Missa Papse Marcelli ' is ' the
most simple of all Palestrina's works': yet, a
glance at the Score will suffice to show that
much of it is written in Real Fugue, and close
Imitation, of so complex a texture as to approach
the character of Canon.2 Not very long ago, this
2 Amhros (ii. xv) goes so far as to say that 'the Basses in the
"Kyrie" are carried on in Canon all' unisono.' They do, indeed.
264 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
wonderful Mass was supposed to possess certain
constructive peculiarities which not only marked
it out as the greatest piece of Church Music that
ever was conceived — as it undoubtedly is — but
which also interposed, between Music written
before, and that produced after it, a gulf as un
fathomable as that which separates the Polyphony
of the 1 6th century from the Monodia of the
1 7th. No idea can possibly be more fallacious.
The true Ecclesiastical Style, as determined by
the 'Missa Papse Marcelli,' differs from that which
preceded it, not in its technical, but in its aesthetic
character. In so far as its external mechanism is
concerned, it exhibits no contrivances which were
not already well known to Okenheim, Josquin
des Pre"s, Goudimel, and a hundred other writers
of inferior reputation. It was not for the sake
of its faultless symmetry, that it was selected
as the model of Ecclesiastical purity. Ambros,
indeed, denies that it ever served as a model at
all; that it effected any reform whatever in the
style of Ecclesiastical Music ; or even that any
such reform was needed, at the time of its pro
duction. This position, however, is untenable.
The opinion of a critic so learned, so talented,
and, generally, so unprejudiced as Ambros, must
not be lightly contravened : but, it is certain
that the Council of Trent did not exaggerate the
necessity for a reform, immediate, stern, and un
compromising ; and, equally so, that that reform
was effected by means of this Mass alone. What,
then, was the secret of this wondrous revolution ?
It lay in the subjugation of Art to the service
of Nature, of learning to effect, of ingenuity
to the laws of beauty. Palestrina was the
first great genius who so concealed his learn
ing as to cause it to be absolutely overlooked
in the beauty of the resulting effect. If it
was given to Okenheim to unite the dry
bones of Counterpoint into a wondrously articu
lated skeleton, and to Josquin to clothe that
skeleton with flesh ; to Palestrina was committed
the infinitely higher privilege of endowing the
perfect form with the spirit which enabled it,
not only to live, but to give thanks to God in
strains such as Polyphony had never before ima
gined. It was not the beauty of its construc
tion, but the presence of the SOUL within it,
that rendered his Music immortal. He was
as much a master of contrivance as the most
accomplished of his predecessors ; but while
they loved their clever devices for their own
sake, he only cared for them in so far as they
served as means for the attainment of something
better. And, though his one great object in intro
ducing this new feature as the basis of his School
was the regeneration of Church Music, it was
impossible that his work should rest there. In
establishing the principle that Art could only be
rightly used as the handmaid of Nature, he not
only provided that the Mass and the Motet should
be devotional ; but, also, that the Chanson and
move in very close Imitation, answering, in many places. Interval for
Interval, with the most perfect exactness : but, as this exactness is
aot carried out continuously, the passage cannot fairly be called a
Canon.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
the Madrigal should be sad, or playful, in ac
cordance with the sentiment of the verses to
which they were adapted. His reform, there
fore, though first exemplified in the most perfect
of Masses, extended afterwards to every branch
of Art. The Canzonetta felt it as deeply as
the Offertorium ; the Frottola, as certainly as
the Faux-bourdon. Henceforth, Imitation and
Canon, and the endless devices of which they
form the groundwork, were estimated at their
true value. They were cultivated as precious
means, for the attainment of a still more precious
end. And, the new life thus infused into the
Art of Counterpoint, in Italy, extended, in a
wonderfully short space of time, to every con
temporary centre of development in Europe ;
though the great Roman School monopolised, to
the last, the one strong characteristic which, more
than any other, separates it from all the rest —
the absolute perfection of that ars artem celandi
which is justly regarded as the most difficult of
all arts. In this, Palestrina excelled, not only
all his predecessors and contemporaries, without
exception, but all the Polyphonic Composers who
have ever lived. Nor has he ever been rivalled in
the perfect equality of his Polyphony. Whatever
may be the number of Parts in which he writes,
none ever claims precedence of another. Neither
is any Voice ever permitted to introduce itself
without having something important to say.
There is no such thing as a 'filling up of the
Harmony ' to be found in any one of his Com
positions. The Harmony is produced by the in
terweaving of the separate Subjects ; and when,
astonished by the unexpected effect of some
strangely beautiful Chord, we stop to examine
its structure, we invariably find it to be no more
than the natural consequence of some little Point
of Imitation, or the working out of some melodious
Response, which fell into the delicious combina
tion of its own accord. In no other Master is
this peculiarity so strikingly noticeable. It is
no uncommon thing for a great Composer to de
light us with a lovely point of repose. The later
Flemish Composers do this continually. But they
always put the Chord into its place, on purpose;
whereas Palestrina's loveliest Harmonies come of
themselves, while he is quietly fitting his Sub
jects together, without, so far as the most careful
criticism can ascertain, a thought beyond the
melodic involutions of his vocal phrases. How
far the Harmonies form a preconceived element
in those involutions is a question too deep for
consideration here.
The features to which we have drawn atten
tion, as most strongly characteristic of Pale
strina's peculiar style, were imitated, without
reserve, by the greatest Composers of his School ;
and though, in no case, does the Scholar ever
approach the perfection reached by the Master,
we find the same high qualities pervading the
works of Vittoria, Giovanni Maria and Berna-
dino Nanini, Felice and Francesco Anerio, Luca
Marenzio, and all the best writers of the period.
The School continued, in full prosperity, until
he closing years of the i6th century; and its
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
traditions were gratefully followed, even late into
the 1 7th, by a few loyal disciples, whose line closed
with Gregorio Allegri, in 1652. These, however,
were but the last devoted lovers of an Art which
ceased to live within a very few years after the
death of the gifted writer who brought it to per
fection. With the age of Palestrina, the reign
of true Polyphony came to an end. But it
took firm root, and bore abundant fruit, during
his lifetime, in many distant countries ; and the
Schools in which it was most successfully culti
vated were those which most carefully carried
out the principle of his great reform.
VII. The Flemish descent of THE VENETIAN
SCHOOL is even more clearly traceable than that
of its Roman sister; notwithstanding the well-
known fact that Italian Musicians were employed
in the service of the Republic, long before the
time of Dufay. For, though the Archives of
S. Mark's prove the existence of a long line of
Organists, stretching back as far as the year
1318, when the office was held by a Venetian,
described as Mistro Zuchetto,1 we meet with no
sign of the formation of a School, before the
third decad of the i6th century, by which time
the Art of the Low Countries had made its mark
in every city in Europe. This circumstance,
however, reflects no discredit upon the earlier
virtuosi, whose extempore performances upon the
Organ, though famous enough in their day, left, of
course, no permanent record behind them. Even
the first Maestro di Cappella, Pietro de Fossis — a
Netherlander, of high reputation, who was pre
sented with the appointment, together with that
of Master of the Choristers, in 1491 — seems to
have been less celebrated as a Composer, than
as a Singer. At any rate, since no trace of his
productions can now be discovered, either printed
or in MS., the title of the Founder of the School
justly devolves upon his successor, Adriano Wil-
laert, than whom a stronger leader could scarcely
have been found. Born, at Bruges, in I48o,2
and received as a pupil, first, by Okenheim, and
afterwards, in Paris, by Josquin des Pre"s — or, as
some imagine, by Mouton — this great represen
tative of Flemish genius succeeded De Fossis, as
Maestro di Cappella, in 1527, and, during thirty-
five years of unwearied industry, enriched the
Library of S.Mark's with a magnificent repertoire
of Masses, Motets, Psalms, Canticles, and other
Ecclesiastical Music, besides delighting the world
with innumerable Madrigals, Canzonets, and
other saecular pieces, among which his ' Villanellse
Neapolitanae,' a 4, stand almost unequalled
for prettiness and freedom. His style presents
all the best characteristics of the Later Flemish
School, tempered by a rich warmth which was
doubtless induced by his long residence in the
most romantic city in the world. Unfortunate^,
though many volumes of his works were pub
lished during his lifetime, but few have been
reproduced in modern Notation. A Motet, a 4,
i One of Mistro ( =Magister) Zuchetto's successors, Bernardo di
Stefanino Murer, who held the appointment from 1445 to 1459, is
accredited with the invention of the Pedal-board. (See Caffi, j. 62.)
Ambros calls him Bernhard der Deutsche, and gives 1470 as the date
of his discovery (iil. 433). 2 Or, according to Ambros, in 1490.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 265
will, however, be found at p. 474, vol. ii. of
Hawkins's History. [See WILLAERT.]
Willaert's successors in office were, Cipriano
di Rore, who held the appointment from 1563
to 1565; Zarlino, (1565-1590); Baldassare
Donati, (1590-1603), and the last great Master
of the School, Giovanni dalla Croce, who was
unanimously elected in 1603, and died, after
five years service, in 1609. These accomplished
Musicians, together with Andrea Gabrieli, who
played the second Organ from 1566 to 1586,
and his nephew, Giovanni, who presided over
the first from 1585 to 1612, proved themselves
faithful disciples of their venerable leader, culti
vating, to the last, a style which combined the rich
Harmony of the Netherlands with not a little of
the melodic independence which we have de
scribed as peculiarly characteristic of the best
Roman period. Upon this was engrafted, in the
finest examples, a certain tenderness of manner,
in which Croce, especially, has scarcely ever
been surpassed. Still, it is always evident that
the harmonious effect is the result of the Com
poser's primary intention, and not, as in the
greatest works of the Roman School, of the inter
weaving of still more important melodic elements ;
a feature which is well illustrated by comparing
the extract from the 'Missa Papae Marcelli,' given
at vol. ii. page 230, with the following fragment
from Andrea Gabrieli's ' Missa Brevis.'
f\ y ( - * * J
^2 * * ,^!\
-z£—& J*f J~J
t^ -<^- {^^ -/^?-
Pa - trem om • nl • po • ten • •
J 1 ! J
-p 1 1 I 1 J
tern, factorem coa -
_, ^ UJ
& — 0 f}. ^ <S. ^
i 1 • — (^ P*-i
-&—&-^ H
n \s \^ C-^ S~D ^^
t ~- ~
^ ' . _ j
i i
J
1
i - — - 1
"\
- 1*3 • - r —•> (^ \
\ ^> :
~ f~" i _j ^ ~ *
* * «r "^
22Z32 ' \^> ^ ^ P
m m »- — , (£i — i-
-(S>- --- 1 ^--l
11 et ter - - - rae.f
~s 1 III
^,- -£2- O- ..-3. <Zs ^^""^J
((( r (^
etc.
J ! 1 1 1
*— *_* ^=3 «""7 -"-—
E£
r r
1 r .. r:
VIII. THE EARLY FLORENTINE SCHOOL,
though far less important than that of Venice,
is not destitute of special interest. A gorgeous
MS., once the property of Giuliano de' Medici,
and still in excellent preservation, contains Com
positions by no less than seven Florentine Musi
cians of the i4th century. Many works of
antient date are also extant, in the collections of
Petrucci, and other early printers. The beauties
of these are, however, entirely forgotten, in those
of the more celebrated School, founded by Fran
cesco Corteccia, who, in the earlier half of the
1 6th century wrote some excellent Church Music,
and a number of beautiful Madrigals, the style
of which differs, very materially, from that cul
tivated in other parts of Italy, assimilating,
indeed, far less closely to the character of the
true Madrigal, than to that of the Frottola — a
lighter kind of composition, more nearly allied
266 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
to the Villanella, or Fa la. On the occasion of
the marriage of Cosmo I. de' Medici with Leonora
of Toledo, in 1539, Corteccia, in conjunction with
Matteo Rampollini, Pietro Masaconi, Baccio
Moschini, and the Roman Composer, Costanzo
Festa, wrote the Music for an entertainment
consisting almost entirely of Madrigals, inter
mixed with a few Instrumental pieces, the whole
of which were printed at Venice, by Antonio
Gardane. A similar performance graced the
marriage of Francesco de' Medici with Bianca
Capello, in 1579, on which occasion Palestrina
contributed his Madrigal 'O felica ore.' For such
festivities as these, the Florentines were always
ready ; but their greatest triumph was reserved
for a later period, which must be discussed in
the second division of our subject.
IX. THE SCHOOLS or LOMBARDY were always
very closely allied to those of Venice : indeed,
the geographical relations of the two Provinces
favoured an interchange of Masters which could
scarcely fail to produce a close similarity, if not
identity of style. Costanzo Porta, the greatest
of Lombard Masters, though a native of Cre
mona, spent the most productive portion of his
life at Padua. Orazio Vecchi wrote most of
his best works at Moilena. Apart from these,
the best writers of the School were Ludovico
Balbo (Porta's greatest pupil), Giac. Ant. Pic-
cioli, Giuseppe Caiino, Giuseppe Biffi, Paolo
Cima, Pietro Pontio, and, lastly, Giangiacomo
Gastoldi, who brought the Fa la, the Frottola,
and the 'Balletto, to a degree of perfection which
has rarely, if ever, been equalled. The Lombard
School also claims as its own the famous Theo
rist, Franchinus Gafurius, who wrote most of his
more important works at Milan, though the
earliest known edition of his earliest production
appeared at Naples, in 1480.
X. To THE NEAPOLITAN SCHOOL belongs
another Theorist of distinction, Joannes Tinctoris,
the compiler of the first Musical Dictionary on
record.1 Naples also claims a high place, among
her best Composers, for Fabricio Dentice, who
lived so long in Rome, that he is usually classed
among the Roman Masters, though he was un
doubtedly, by birth, a Neapolitan, and a bright
ornament of the School ; as were also Giov.
Leon, Primavera, Luggasco Luggaschi, and other
accomplished Madrigalists, whose lighter works
take rank with the best Balletti and Frottole
of Milan and Florence.
XI. THE SCHOOL OP BOLOGNA exhibits so few
characteristics of special interest, that we may
safely dismiss it, with those of other Italian cities
of less importance, from our present enquiry,
and proceed to study the progress of Polyphony
in other countries.
XII. The Founder of THE GERMAN POLY
PHONIC SCHOOL was Adam de Fulda, born about
1460; a learned Monk, more celebrated as a
writer on subjects associated with Music, than
as a Composer, though his Motet, ' O vera lux
1 Joan. Tinctoris 'Terminorum Musicae diffinitorium.' No date.
Only a very few copies are believed to be in existence : but a cheap
reprint may be had of Messrs. Cocks & Co., New Burlington Street.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
et gloria,' printed by Glareanus, shows that his
knowledge of Counterpoint was not confined to
its theoretical side. This remarkable Composi
tion, like the more numerous works of Heinrich
Finck (a contemporary writer, of great and
varied talent), Thomas Stolzer, Hermann Finck
(a nephew of Heinrich), Heinrich Isaak, Ludvrig
Senfl, and others long forgotten even by their own
countrymen, bears so close an analogy to the
style cultivated in the Netherlands, that it is im
possible to imagine the German Masters obtaining
their knowledge from any other source than that
provided by their Flemish neighbours. Isaak —
born about 1440 — was one of the most learned
Contrapuntists of the period, and, in all essential
particulars, a follower of the Flemish School;
though his talent as a Melodist was altogether
exceptional. It seems quite certain that he was
the Composer of the grand old Tune, ' Inspruck,
ich muss Dich lassen,' afterwards known as
' Nun ruhen alle Walder/and ' 0 Welt, ich muss
Dich lassen,' and treated over and over again by
Sebastian Bach, in his Cantatas.2 And this cir
cumstance introduces us to an entirely new and
original feature in the German School. The pro
gress of the Reformation undoubtedly retarded the
development of the higher branches of Polyphony
very seriously. With the discontinuance of the
Mass, the demand for ingenuity of construction
came to an end ; or was, at best, confined to the
Seecular Chanson. But, at the same time, there
arose a pressing necessity for that advanced form
of the Faux-bourdon which so soon developed
itself into the Four-part Choral ; and, in this,
the German Composers distinguished themselves,
if not above all others, at least as the equals of
the best contemporary writers — witness the long
list of Choral books, from the time of Walther
to the close of the i7th century. We all know
to what splendid results this new phase of Art
eventually led ; but, for the time being, it acted
only as a hindrance to healthful progress; and,
notwithstanding the good work wrought by
Nicholas Paminger, the last great Master of the
School, who died at Passau in 1608, it would,
in all probability, have produced a condition of
absolute stagnation, but for an unforeseen in
fusion of new life from Italy.
XIII. THE SCHOOLS OF MUNICH AND
NUREMBERG must be regarded, not as later de
velopments of Teutonic Art, but as foreign im
portations, to which Germany was indebted for ^
an impulse which afterwards proved of infinite
service to her. They were founded, respectively,
by Orlando di Lasso, and Hans Leo Hasler ; the
first a Netherlander, and the last a true Ger
man. Of Orlando di Lasso, so much has al
ready been recorded, in our second volume, that
it is unnecessary to dilate upon his history here.
Suffice it then to say, that, thanks to his long
residence in Italy, his style united all the best
qualities of the Flemish and the Italian Schools,
and enabled him to set an example, at Munich,
which the Germans were neither too cold to
appreciate, nor too proud to turn to their own
2 See vol. i. p. 7016.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
advantage. Hasler was born, at Nuremberg, in
1564; but learned his Art in Venice, under
Andrea Gabrieli, whose nephew, Giovanni, was
his fellow pupil, and most intimate friend. So
thoroughly did he imbibe the principles and man
ner of the School in which he studied, that the
Venetians themselves considered him as one of
their own fraternity, Italianising his name into
Gianleone. His works possess all the rich Har
mony for which Gabrieli himself is so justly
famous, and all the Southern softness which the
Venetian Composers so sedulously cultivated; and
are, moreover, filled with evidences of consum
mate contrapuntal skill, as are also those of his
countrymen, Jakob Handl ( = Jacobus Gallus),
Adam Gumpeltzheimer, Gregor Aichinger, and
many others, who, catching the style from him,
spread it abroad throughout the whole of Ger
many.1 Of its immediate effect upon the native
Schools, we can scarcely speak in more glowing
terms than those used by the German historians
themselves. Of its influence upon the future we
shall have more to say hereafter.
XIV. The history of THE EARLY FRENCH
SCHOOL is so closely bound up with that of its
Flemish sister, that it is no easy task to separate
the two. Indeed, it is sometimes impossible to
ascertain whether a Composer, with a French -
sounding name, was a true Frenchman, a true
Netherlander, or a native of French Flanders.
Not only is this the case with the numerous
writers whose works are included in the collec
tions published by Pierre Attaignant, Adrian le
Koy, and Ballard ; but there is a doubt even
about the birth of Jean Mouton, who is de
scribed by Glareanus as a Frenchman, and by
other writers as a Fleming. The doubt, how
ever, involves no critical confusion, since the
styles of the two Schools were precisely the
same. Both Josquin des Prds and Mouton
spent some of the most valuable years of their
lives in Paris ; and taught their Art to French
men and Netherlanders without distinction.
Pierre Carton, Clement Jannequin, Noe Faignient,
Eustache du Caurroy, and other Masters of the
i6th century, struck out no new line for them
selves : while Elziario Genet (II Carpentrasso),
the greatest of all, might easily pass for a born
Netherlander. A certain amount of originality
was, however, shown by a few clever Composers
who attached themselves to the party of the
Huguenots, and set the Psalms of Clement Marot
and Beza to Music, for the use of the Calvinists,
as Walther and his followers had already set
Hymns for the Lutherans. The number of
these writers was so small, that they cannot lay
claim to be classed as a national School ; but,
few though they were, they carried out their
work in a thoroughly artistic spirit. The Psalms
of Claudin Lejeune — of which an example will be
found in vol. i. p. 762 — are no trifles, carelessly
thrown off, to serve the purpose of the moment ;
but finished works of Art, betraying the hand of
1 A comprehensive selection of works of this School will be found
In Bodenschatz's • Florile-iium Portense,' and a few flue examples
In Proske's ' Musica Divlna/ [See vol. i. 253 ; vol. 11. 411.]
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 267
the Master in every note. Some of the same
Psalms were also set by Claude Goudimel, but
in a very different style. The Calvinists de
lighted in singing their Metrical Psalmody to
the simplest Melodies they could find ; yet these
are veritable Motets, exhibiting so little sym
pathy with Huguenot custom, that, if it be true,
as tradition asserts, that their author perished,
at Lyons, on S. Bartholomew's Day, 1572, one
is driven to the conclusion that he must have
been killed, like many a zealous Catholic, by mis
adventure. He was one of the greatest Composers
the French School ever produced, and excelled
by very few in the rest of Europe. Scarcely
inferior, in technical skill, to Okenheim and Jos-
quin, he was infinitely their superior in fervour
of expression, and depth of feeling. His claim
to the honour of having instructed Palestrina has
already been discussed elsewhere. Considered in
connection with that claim, the following speci
men of his style, printed, at Antwerp, by Tylman
Susato, in 1554, is especially interesting. [See
vol. i. p. 612 ; vol. ii. p. 635.]
1 A r> i
T
"I
. — -J—
i(u *•
1 <*3 . f3
ez • i -
1 • j
22±I22ld
vy 2
-<=J
_ — 1
~ c^ c*> c^ c?
&
Dom - i • ne, quid muT- ti - pll -
ca - ti
* "%•
|
1
•
i
2~i — (
-I
— 1 —
a >j
i
- e-^ — **)—
\ *y & <d
t*^J f^S • ~.
^_ _-Q £*> & r
\^ ^-> ~^~ '(^ ~\~ -&- ' 1
/*^? /^5 *t5
n
-£2_
*±
'-^ •— •*
=2 ^f~\ 0
A _
^J f^j ^S
i If A A
FIJI
d — ^ — i
•»- '*
etc.
J J _
XV. The Eoman origin of THE SPANISH
SCHOOL is so clearly manifest, that it is un
necessary to say more on the subject than has
been already said at page 263. After the re
turn of the Papal Court from Avignon, in 1377,
Spanish Singers with good Voices were always
sure of a warm welcome in Rome ; learned
Counterpoint, in the Eternal City, first, from
the Flemings there domiciled, and afterwards,
from the Romans themselves ; practised their
Art with honour in the Sistine Chapel; and,
not unfrequently, carried it back with them to
268 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Spain. So completely are the Spaniards identi
fied with the Romans, that the former are neces
sarily described as disciples of the School of
Festa, or that of Palestrina, as the case may be.
To the former class belong Bartolomeo Escobedo,
Francesco Salinas, Juan Scribano, Cristofano
Morales, Francesco Guerrero, and Didaco Ortiz :
the greatest genius of the latter was Ludovico
da Vittoria, who approached more nearly to Pa
lestrina himself than any other Composer, of any
age or country. Many of these great writers —
including Vittoria— ended their days in Spain,
after long service in the Churches of Rome : and
thus it came to pass that the Roman style of
Composition was cultivated, in both countries,
with equal zeal, and almost equal success.1
XVI. Our rapid sketch of the progress of
Polyphony on the Continent will serve materially
to simplify a similar account of its development
in England, in which country it was practised,
as we have already promised to show, at an
earlier period than even in the Netherlands.
A hundred years ago, when few attempts had
been made to arrange the general History of Music
in a systematic form, attention was drawn to the
curious 'Rota' — or, as we should now call it,
Canon — ' Sumer is icumen in/ contained in vol.
978 of the Harleian MSS. Burney estimated
the date of this, in rough terms, as probably
not much later than the I3th or I4th cen
tury. His opinion, however, was a mere guess ;
while that of Hawkins was so vague that it may
safely be dismissed as valueless. Ritson, whose
authority cannot be lightly set aside, believed
the document — now known as ' The Reading
MS. ' — to be at least as old as the middle of
the I3th century; and accused both Burney,
and Hawkins, of having intentionally left the
question in doubt, from want of the courage
necessary for the expression of a positive opinion.
Chappell gives the same date ; and complains
bitterly of Burney's tergiversation. The late
Sir Frederick Madden was of opinion that that
portion of the MS. which contains the 'Rota'
was written about the year 1240, and has left
some notes, to that effect, on the fly-leaf of the
volume.2 Ambros, in the second volume of his
'Geschichte der Musik,' published in 1862, re
ferred the MS. to the middle of the 1 5th
century, thus making it exactly synchronous
with the Second Flemish School. Meanwhile,
Coussemaker,3 aided by new light thrown upon
the subject from other sources, arrived at the
conclusion that the disputed page could not have
been written later than the year 1226 ; and that
the ' Rota ' was certainly composed, by a Monk
of Reading, some time before that date : and
this position he defended so valiantly, that
1 A large collection of the Music of the Spanish School will be
found in Eslava's 'Liro sacro-hispana.' [See vol. i. 494.]
2 We think it desirable, in so hotly-disputed a case, to give Sir
Frederick Madden's remarks, verbatim. He first says—' The whole is
of the thirteenth century, except some writing on ff. 15-17.— F. M.'
And, again— ' In all probability, the earlier portion of this volume
was written in the Abbey of Reading about the year 1210. Compare
the Obits in the Calendars with those in the Calendar of the Cartulary
of Beading in the MS. Cott. Vesp. B. V.— F. M. April 1862.'
a 'L'Art Harmonique aux xii et xiii siecles/ Paris, 1865, pp. 144, 150.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Ambros, most cautious of critics, accepted the
new view, without hesitation, in his third volume,
printed in 1868.
Assuming this view to be correct, THE EARLY
ENGLISH SCHOOL was founded a full century
and a half before the admission of Dufay to
the Pontifical Chapel. But, while giving this
discovery its full weight, we must not value it
at more than it is wrorth. It does not absolutely
prove that the Art of Composition originated
in England. We have already said that the in
vention of Counterpoint has hitherto eluded all
enquiry. It was, in fact, invented nowhere— if
we are to use the word ' invention ' in the sense
in which we should apply it to gunpowder, or the
telescope. It was evolved, by slow degrees, from
Diaphonia, Discant, and Organum. All we can
say about it as yet is, that the oldest known
example — or, at least, the oldest example to which
a date can be assigned with any approach to
probability — is English.4 An earlier record may
be discovered, some day ; though, thanks to the
two-fold spoliation our Ecclesiastical Libraries
have suffered within the last 350 years, it is
scarcely likely that it will be found in England.
Meanwhile, we must content ourselves with the
reflection that, so far as our present knowledge
goes, the Early English School is the oldest in the
world ; though the completeness of the Composi
tion upon which this statement is based, proves
that Art must have made immense advances
before it was written. For, the ' Reading Rota'
is no rude attempt at Vocal Harmony. It is
a regular Composition, for six Voices; four
of which sing a Canon in the Unison, while
the remaining two sing another Canon — called
' Pes ' — which forms a kind of Ground Bass to
the whole. Both Hawkins and Burney have
printed the solution in Score. We think it
better to present our readers with an accurate
fac-simile of the original MS. ; leaving them to
score it for themselves, in accordance with the
directions given in the margin, and to form their
own opinion of the evidence afforded by the
style of its Caligraphy. In the original copy,
the Clefs, Notes, and English words, are written
in black ; as are also the directions for per
formance, beginning 'Hanc rotam,' etc. The
six Lines of the Stave, the Cross placed to show
where the second Voice is to begin, the Latin
words, the second initial S, the word Pes, and
the directions beginning 'Hoc repetit,' and
' Hoc dicit,' are red. The first initial S is blue,
as is also the third. Ambros believes the Latin
words, and the directions beginning 'Hanc
rotam,' to have been added, at a later period,
by another hand. Many years have elapsed
since our own attention was first directed to the
MS., which we have since subjected to many
searching examinations. At one period, we
ourselves were very much inclined to believe in
•» The lately-discovered 'Montpellier MS.' is referred, by Cousse
maker, to the last third of the 13th century. To the very sntiei
copy of the 'Prose de 1'ane' now in the possession of Big. Paccni-
arotti, of Padua, and sometimes quoted as the oldest specimen <
Part-Music in existence, it is absolutely impossible to assign a fl«<"
date with any probability. [See vol. ii. p. 462.J
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
269
L Vwcrtftomum m-
JRL
^ 1 *
1
505 ,
^
I* if
^ ""1
t ^ ^
IF — ^
: " f
utoT
1 ' - - i _" * IS
*-t: i
* 1 '
-— ^->— .g. ,
"^
«f
tnora^ 'VKao— -Qjucayauop
camycgimw^ in cr jg
S. ..fef^^ffl natam
the presence of a second hand-writing. But, the
evidence afforded by a photograph taken during
our investigations convinces us that we did not
make sufficient allowance for the different ap
pearance of the black and red letters, which,
reduced to the same tone by the process of photo-
270 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
graphy, resemble each other so closely, that we
now feel assured that the entire page was written
by the same hand. Coussemaker seems toentertain
no doubt that this was the hand of John Forn-
sete, a Reading Monk, of whom we have intel
ligence in the Cartulary, down to the year 1236,
but no other record later than 1226. It seems
rash to append this learned Ecclesiastic's name
to the ' Rota,' until some farther evidence shall be
forthcoming: but it is gratifying to find that the
mystery in which the subject has hitherto been
shrouded is gradually disappearing.
Besides the above Rota, and a few specimens
of unisonous Plain Chaunt, the volume we have
described contains three Motets, ' Regina cle-
mencie,' 'Dum Maria credidit,' and ' Ave gloriosa
virginum ' — at the end of the last of which are
three sets of Parts for ' Cantus superius,' and
three for ' Cantus inferius,' added in a different
hand-writing ; and another Motet, 'Ave gloriosa
Mater,' written in Three-Part Score, on a Stave
consisting of from thirteen to fifteen lines as
occasion demands, with a Quadruplum (or fourth
Part), added, in different writing, at the end.1
Beyond these precious reliques, we possess no
authentic record of what may be called the First
Period of the development of Art in England.
Either the School died out, or its archives have
perished.
The Second Period, inaugurated during the
earlier half of the I5th century, and therefore
contemporary with the School of Dufay, is more
fully represented, and boasts some lately-discovered
reliques of great interest. Its leader was John
of Dunstable, a man of no ordinary talent, whose
identity has been more than once confused with
that of S. Dunstan! though we have authentic
records of his death, in 1453, an(i burial in the
Church of S. Stephen, Walbrook, London. In the
time of Burney, it was supposed that two frag
ments only of his works survived ; one quoted
by Gafurius, the other by Morley. Baini, how
ever, discovered a set of Saecular Chansons a 3,
in the Vatican Library ; and a very valuable
codex in the Liceo Filarmonico, at Bologna, is
now found to contain four of his Compositions
for the Church, besides a number of works by
other English Composers of the period, most of
whom are otherwise unknown.
The Third Period is more bare of records than
the First. No trace of its Compositions can be
discovered ; and the only interest attaching to it
arises from the fact that its leaders, John Ham-
boys, Mus. Doc., Thomas Saintwix, Mus. Doc.,
and Henry Habengton, Mus. Bac., who all
flourished during the reign of King Edward IV.
were the first Musicians ever honoured with
special Academical Degrees.
The best writer of the Fourth Period was
1 The 'Regina clemencie' will be found on fol. 41 of the MS.;
'Dum Maria credidit,' on fol. 5; 'Ave gloriosa virginum/ on fol. 6;
the three sets of Parts fur Cantus Superius, and Inferius, on 76
and 8; 'Ave gloriosa Mater,' on 86, and 9 ; and the Rota itself, on
fol. 10. All therefore, are included in 'the earlier portion of 'the
MS," as described by Sir Frederick Madden. (See page 268 o, note 2.)
A later copy of ' Ave gloriosa Mater,' without the added Quadruplum,
has been discovered in the ' Montpellier MS.,' and Is ascribed, by
Cou&seznaker, to Franco of Cologne.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Dr. Fayrfax, who took his Degree in 1511, and
is well represented by some Masses, of consider
able merit, in the Music School at Oxford, and a
collection of Saecular Songs, in the well-known
' Fayrfax MS.,' which also contains a number of
similar works by Syr John Phelyppes, Gilbert
Banester, Rowland Davy, William of Newark,
and other writers of the School. The style of
these pieces is thoroughly Flemish ; but wanting,
alike in the ingenuity of Okenheim, and the ex
pression of his followers. Still, the School did
its work well. England had not fulfilled the
promise of her first efforts ; but she now made
a new beginning, evidently under Flemish in
struction, and never afterwards betrayed her
trust.
Good work never fails to produce good fruit.
If the labours of Fayrfax and Phelyppes brought
forth little that was worth preserving on its
own account, they at least prepared the way
for the more lasting triumphs of the Fifth
Period, the Compositions of which will bear
comparison with the best contemporaneous pro
ductions, either of Flanders, or of Italy. This
epoch extends from the beginning of the i6th
century, to the period immediately preceding
the appearance of Tallis and Byrd ; correspond
ing, in this country, with the dawn of the aera,
known in Rome as ' The Golden Age.' It
numbered, among its writers, a magnate of no
less celebrity than King Henry VIII, who
studied Music, diligently, at that period of his
life during which it was supposed that he was
destined to fill the See of Canterbury, and never
afterwards neglected to practise it. No doubt,
this early initiation into the mysteries of Art
prompted the imperious monarch to extend a
more than ordinary amount of encouragement to
its votaries, in later life ; and to this fortunate cir
cumstance we are probably largely indebted for
that general diffusion of the taste for good Music,
so quaintly described by Morley, which, taking
such firm hold on the hearts of the people
that it was considered disgraceful not to be
able to take part in a Madrigal, led, ere long,
to the final emergence of our School from the
trammels of bare mechanical industry into the
freedom which true inspiration alone can give.
The Composers who took the most prominent
part in this great work were John Thorne,
John Redford (Organist of Old St. Paul's),
George Etheridge, Robert Johnson, John Taver-
ner, Robert Parsons, John Mar beck (Organist
of St. George's Chapel, Windsor), Richard Ed-
wardes, and John Shepherde — all men of mark,
and enthusiastic lovers of their Art.
Contemporaries of Archadelt and Waelrant,
in Flanders, of Willaert, in Venice, and of Festa,
in Rome, these men displayed, in their works,
an amount of talent in no degree inferior to that
shown by the great Continental Masters.
Redford's Anthem, ' Rejoice in the Lord
alway,' first printed by Hawkins, and since re-
published by the Motet Society, is a model
of the true Ecclesiastical style, one of the
finest specimens of the grand old English School
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 271
of Cathedral Music we possess. The graceful
contour of its Subjects, the purity of the Har
mony produced by their mutual involutions,
and, above all, the beauty of its expression,
entitle it, not only to the first place among the
Compositions of its own period, but to a very
high one as compared with those of the still
more brilliant epoch which was to follow. That
the writer of such an Anthem as this should
have been an idle man is impossible. He must
have produced a host of other treasures. Yet,
it is by this alone that he is known to us ; and
it is much to be feared that he will nevermore be
represented by another work of equal magnitude,
though it would be well worth while to collect
together the few fragments of his writings which
are still preserved in MS.1
Equally scarce are the works of Richard Ed-
wardes, known chiefly by one of the loveliest
Madrigals that ever was written — ' In going to
my naked bedde.' We have already had occasion
to call attention to the beauties of this delightful
work,2 which rivals — we might almost say sur
passes — the finest Flemish and Italian Madrigals
of the Period, and was certainly never excelled,
before the time of Palestrina or Luca Marenzio.
For this, also, we have to thank the research
and discrimination of Hawkins, who gives it in
his fifth volume: but it has since been reprinted,
many times ; and it is not likely that it will
ever again be forgotten.
Johnson was one of the most learned Contra
puntists of the period, and excelled almost all
his contemporaries in the art of writing Imita
tions upon a Canto fermo. Of the writings of
Taverner and Parsons, good specimens will be
found in the Psalters of Este and Ravenscroft,
as well as in the Histories of Burney and
Hawkins ; while many more remain in MS.
Among the latter, a Madrigal for five Voices,
by Parsons — ' Enforced by love and feare ' — pre
served in the Library of Christ Church, Oxford,
is particularly interesting, as establishing the
writer's title to an honourable place among the
leaders of a School of Ssecular Music with which
his name is not generally associated.
1 — — H — H — l &-*-\ — — PH 1—*
En-forced by love and feare
A few of Shepherde's Compositions may be
found in a work entitled 'Mornyng and Eve-
nyng Prayer and Communion,' London, 1565.
He is also well represented in the Christchurch
Library, in a series of MS. Compositions of a
very high order of merit. Most of them are
Motets, with Latin words ; but a few are English
Anthems — possibly, adaptations — from one of
which we have selected the following example.
o
God, be mer-cl-ful
O
1 A Motet— Vest! precinct!— for five Voices has been found in a
set of 16th-century Part-Books, at Christ Church, Oxford; but, un
happily, the Tenor volume is missing.
2 See vol. ii, p. 192.
e
(r *
Jl
1:
\
£^ £3 ' \
*^Z?
- \ \
-&- -&- P 1* j
iu-J-_j_j
r i &&
\ ^^
' '
P sLmsznz2
• fi*7
t /i
^^^
^ > P
• t^
^- ^
G
\
\ i i
O God, be
od, be mer-ci - ful
, J
mer - ci - ful, O
un - to us.
i i
God, be mer-ci-ful
i i
J <&
-J -J
I
—
-J ,-d *
L
__ ^_,
"3T •*
t i 1
1 • ~^3-
n TS i
J - J
^-^
^f f^T
=; ^j 1
—
K
*-•' r^-1 (^?
£3
1
un - to us.
1 - 1 t
t I
l
1 1
\ ~
J J ^ . ^4 \
-ed
^ - *~3 -J
^J S_Z3tffl
• ^^L
rc j
_fj" Ij r, ^
J~ .^-l
_^^, °5^ T
r^m r^ (^ ^
f^f^ /«*^
r* '^ e_!
- i
r^ ^
1 i 1 1 -
<=^ \ i
L - - -'
— --
! i i
r^
1 i
— ««— 4 -
i i - "f
^ ,-j m j
_J _i J
"3 -4 e=j
22 ^ :Z« >-)
i i i r
^^ -~-. .^*
| i etc.
^•^
^ • • cs &~
^
~= — r F^ P P 1
. . j .. . | cj - _ ' i : i i j .
Since the restoration of Anglican Plain Chaunt,
Dy the Rev. T. Helmore, Marbeck's name has
seen a 'household word' among English Church
men ; but only in connection with his strictly
unisonous ' Booke of Common Praier noted.'
No one seems to know that he was not only a
distinguished Contrapuntist, but also one of the
most expressive Composers of the English School.
The very few specimens of his style which we
possess are of no common order of merit. The
example selected is from a MS. Mass, ' Missa,
272 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Per arma Justitise/ preserved at Oxford, in a
set of very incorrectly-written Parts, from which
Dr. Burney scored a few extracts. As Marbeck
was a zealous follower of the new religion, it is
clear that this Mass must have been written dur
ing his early life. Where, then, is his English
Church Music ? It is impossible to believe that
so ardent a reformer, and so great a Musician,
took no part in the formation of that School of
purely English Cathedral Music to which all the
best Composers of the period gave so much at
tention. Surely, some fragments, at least, of his
works must remain in our Chapter Libraries.
-tzL 3£.
„
-I — 1-
t t
f f - ,
=3=
etc.
The Notes marked *, are sung by the Bass ; those marked t.
by the Tenor.
We regret that we can find no room for
more numerous, or more extended examples,
selected from the works of a period which has
not received the attention it deserves from
English Musicians : but, we trust that we have
said and quoted enough to show that this
long-neglected School, supported by the learning
of Johnson, the flowing periods of Marbeck, and
the incomparable expression of Bedford and
Edvvardes, can hold its own, with honour, against
any other of the time ; and we are not without
hope that our countrymen may some day become
alive to the importance of its monuments, and
strive to rescue from final oblivion Compositions
certainly not unworthy of our regard, as precursors
of those which glorified the greatest Period of all
— the Period which corresponded with that of
the ' Missa Papse Marcelli ' in Italy.
The leader of the Sixth Period was Christopher
Tye, whose genius prepared the way, first, for the
works of Robert Whyte, and, through these, for
those of the two greatest writers who have ever
adorned the English School — Thomas Tallis, and
William Byrd. Tye's Compositions are very
numerous. His best-known work is a Metrical
Version of the Acts of the Apostles, in which
the simplicity of the Faux-bourdon is combined
with a purity of Harmony worthy of the best
Flemish Masters, and a spirit all his own. Two
of these under other titles — ' Sing to the Lord in
joyful strains/ and "Mock not God's Name/ are
included in Hullah's 'Part Music/ and well
known to Part-singers. Besides these, the Library
of ChristchurchjOxford, contains 7 of hisAnthems,
and 14 Motets, for 3, 4, ^ and 6 Voices ; and that
of the Music School, a Mass, ' Euge bone,' for 6
Voices, which is, perhaps, the greatest of his sur
viving works. A portion of the ' Gloria ' of this
Mass, scored by Dr. Burney, in his second volume,
and reprinted in Hullah's 'Vocal Scores,' will
well repay careful scrutiny. One of its Subjects
corresponds, very curiously, with a fragment,
called 'APoynt/ by John Shepherde, written,
most probably, for the instruction of some ad
vanced pupils, and printed by Hawkins. It is
interesting to compare the grace of Shepherde's
unpretending though charming little example,
with the skilfully constructed network of Imita
tion with which Tye has surrounded the Subject.
We need not transcribe the passages, as they
may so easily be found in the works we have
named ; but, the following less easily accessible
example of Tye's broad masculine style will serve
still better to exemplify both the quiet power and
the melodious grace of his accustomed manner.
Ascendo ad Patrem. Motet d 5.
st^rq
-g^-r-
tl
^
5
L
J-
etc.
Still greater, in some respects, than Tye, was
Robert Whyte ; known only — we shame to say
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
it ! — by an Anthem for 5 Voices, ' Lord, who shall
dwell in Thy tabernacle?' printed in the third
volume of Burney's History, and a few pieces pre
served by Barnard ; though no less than 35 of his
Compositions, comprising 4 Anthems, 25 Motets,
and 6 Lamentations, lie in MS. in the Library
of Christ Church, Oxford, without hope of pub
lication. These works are models of the best
English style, at its best period. Not merely
remarkable for their technical perfection, but
full of expression and beauty. Yet these fine
Compositions have been left to accumulate the
dust, while the inspirations of Kent and Jackson
have been heard in every Church in England, to
say nothing of later Compositions, which would
be very much the better for a little infusion of
Kent's spontaneity and freshness. In order to
give some idea of the tenderness of Whyte's
general style, we subjoin an extract from an
Anthem- — 'The Lorde blesse us, and keepe us' —
included in Barnard's collection, but neither
mentioned in the Christ Church Catalogue, nor
noticed by Burney, though it is contained in the
valuable and beautifully-transcribed set of Part-
Books which furnished him with the text, of the
only Composition by Whyte that has until now
been printed in modern form.1 The pathetic
character of the Hypoasolian Mode was probably
never more strongly exhibited than in this beau
tiful passage.
MODUS X.
The
Lorde blesse
A I
v - i
BB3
— r"
• *
The Lorde blesse
j
us
*l
and keepe us
i 8
— -^ 1 & -r-^
*• t
» •
(
ZL I
The Lorde
blesse
<T3 ~^~
The Lorde blesse
r r
u *
us (and keepe us
i This set of Part-Books, dated 1581, and still In excellent preser
vation, consists of five small oblong 4to volumes, beautifully tran
scribed, and embellished with quaint old Latin verses, and mottos,
expressed In penmanship so delicate that it might easily be mistaken,
for copper-plate engraving. It contains 20 Compositions by Whyte,
55 by Byrde, 1 by Bruster, 1 by Dr. John Bull, 2 by Farrant. 1 by
tferrabpsco, 1 by W. Giles, 1 by Johnson, 3 by Orlando dl Lasso. 1 by
Mallorie, 1 by W. Mundaie, 1 by Francesco Mocheni, 8 by R. Parsons,
1 by Phillips, 1 by Shepard, 1 by Strogers, 1 by Tailer, 5 by Tallis, 6 by
Dr. Tye, 2 by Woodcock, and 19 by Anonymous Authors. Burney
mentions it (Hist. vol. iii. p. 66, note o), with a graceful tribute of
thanks to the Dean and Chapter, by whose courtesy he was per
mitted to use It in any way he pleased. We ourselves are indebted to
the kindness of the present Librarian for a similar privilege, which
has proved of infinite value in the preparation of our analysis of the
works of the Early English School.
The same rich Library contains another set of Part-Books, of at
least equal interest, one of the six volumes of which— the Tenor— is
unhappily missing.
VOL. III. PT. 3.
%
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 273
tf
3
^=£--
^FgTZP"^
*W& ^
-&- -G-.
£fe
-£S-
•zy
9
3
&
f-
22:
5LI
— •*•&
1
J t
• — -£5
-£*-!. — •-
=A
^ fgr*^
1 IP G
i
\
:&
-ts>- jm-
J
^
^
I
~~&y i
etc.
T
But, neither Tye nor Whyte reached to the
height attained by Tallis ; who is, perhaps, better
known, and more fairly judged, than any other
English Composer of the time, though his most
popular works are not in all cases his best.
To speak to English Organists of his .Responses,
his Litany, or his Service in the Dorian Mode,
would be superfluous. But, how many are equally
well acquainted with his Motet, ' Salvator mundi/
or his fearfully intricate Canon, ' Miserere nostri '?
How many know that the original of 'I call and
cry 'is an ' 0 sacrum convivium ' worthy of any
Church Composer in the world short of Palestrina
himself? How many have looked into the ' Can-
tiones Sacrse,' which he wrote in conjunction
with his pupil Byrd, and the MS. treasures
scored in Burney's ' Extracts,' or the ' Matthias
Collection ' ? Yet it is here that we must look
for Tallis, if we wish to form any idea of his
true greatness. The world has not seen many
more accomplished Contrapuntists than he ; nor
has he ever been excelled in the exquisite ' sur
prises ' of his Harmony. We have said that
Palestrina so interwove his phrases together as
to give birth to some wonderful Chord at every
274
Voc. First Choir.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
2
3
4
'
f
- sj. J*1 -«-
Y T
r
Second Choir.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
f|
F 1 • &-
^=gj=E-=j=^
-=^=^-
..
* i^
f-
Third Choir.
A J.
•Lj-
E2
r r— F
r J J.
-
f ^>
'
J J
Fourth Choir.
EE E3EE3
>
J
Fifth Choir.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Sixth Choir.
-G>-
t=
J
^
Seventh Choir.
31
32
33
34
35
ff^
r^r r ' r
J
*£*T
Eighth Choir.
37
38
39
40
-^=^==±s^
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
turn. Tallis could not approach the great Italian
Master in this. No one ever did. But, he
managed to place some wonderful Chord, at every
turn ; and, so to place it, that the ear could not
fail to be ravished by its beauty. It is worthy of
notice, that those of his Compositions, in which
this peculiarity is most strongly developed, are
the best known, and) the most highly prized.
They are, indeed, preeminently beautiful. But,
so are many others, of which the very names
have long since been forgotten ; while some, well
known by name, are just as much forgotten, in
reality, as the rest. Among these last is one
— the famous Motet, ' Spem in alium non habui,'
for 40 Voices — which has been very frequently
mentioned, though rarely described with the
accuracy desirable in a case of such exceptional
interest. Hawkins's account of it is too vague
to be of any technical value whatever. Burney,
though sufficiently minute in his attention to
details, seems to have strangely misunderstood
his author, in one very important particular.
He tells us that the Voices are not arranged in
separate Choirs, but treated as a single mass.
No statement can possibly be more incorrect than
this. The 40 Voices are, beyond all controversy,
disposed in eight distinct Five-Part Choirs,
which sometimes answer each other antiphonally
— one or more whole Choirs resting, for a con
siderable number of bars together, while others
continue the development of the various Subjects
— and, sometimes, sing together, in vast ' Quadri-
gesimal Harmony,' no less real than that which
Burney so well describes, but infinitely more
complicated, being compounded of eight quin
tuple masses, each, as a general rule, complete
in itself, though cases will be found in which
the Bass of one Choir is needed to support the
Harmonies sung by another — e.g. in the last
Bar, where, without the lower G, sung by the
Third, Fifth, and Eighth Choirs, the First and
Sixth Choirs would present a forbidden Chord of
the 6-4, while the Seventh Choir would end with
a Chord of the Sixth.1
The leading Subject is proposed by the Altus
of the First Choir, and answered in turn by the
Cantus, the Tenor, the Quintus (in this case repre
sented by a Duplicate Altus), and the Bass. The
Second Choir enters, after three and a half bars
rest, with the same Subject, answered in the
same order. The Third Choir enters, one Voice
at a time, in the middle of the eleventh bar;
the Fourth, at the beginning of the sixteenth
bar; the Fifth, at the twenty-third bar; the
Sixth, in the middle of the twenty -fourth bar ;
the Seventh, at the beginning of the twenty-
eighth bar ; and the Eighth, at the beginning of
the thirty-third bar; no two Parts ever making
their entry at the same moment. The whole body
of Voices is now employed, for some considerable
time, in 40 real Parts. A new Subject is then
proposed, and treated in like manner. The
final climax is formed by a long and highly
elaborate passage of ' Quadrigesimal Harmony/
culminating in a Plagal Cadence of gigantic pro-
i A similar licence is taken in Bar 13, and many other places.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 275
portions, and concluding with an Organ Point,
of moderate length, which we present to our
readers, entire. It would be manifestly im
possible to write in so many Parts, without
taking an infinity of Licences forbidden in or
dinary cases. Many long passages are neces
sarily formed upon the reiterated notes of a single
Harmony; and many progressions are introduced,
which, even in eight Parts, would be condemned
as licentious. Still, the marvel is, that the Parts
are all real. Whatever amount of indulgence
may be claimed, no two Voices ever * double'
each other. Whether the effect produced be
worth the labour expended upon it, or not, the
Composition is, at any rate, exactly what it
asserts itself to be — a genuine example of Forty-
Part Counterpoint : and the few bars we have
selected for our example will show this as clearly
as a longer extract.2 (See opposite page.)
As Tallis is chiefly known by his Litany and
Kesponses, so is his great pupil, William Byrd, by
' Non nobis, Domine,' a ' Service,' and a few^
Anthems, translated from the Latin ; while the
greater number of his 'Cantiones Sacrae,' his
Mass for 5 Voices, and his delightful Madrigals,
are recognised only as antiquarian curiosities.
The only known copies of his two Masses for
3 and 4 Voices seem, indeed, to be hopelessly
lost ; nothing having been heard of them, since
they were ' knocked down ' to Triphook, at the
sale of Bartleman's Library, in 1822. But, a
goodly number of his works may very easily
be obtained, in print ; while larger collections of
his MS. productions are preserved in more than
one of our Collegiate Libraries. We ought to
know more of these fine Compositions, the grave
dignity of which has never been surpassed. It
is in this characteristic that their chief merit
lies. They are less expressive, in one sense,
than the more tender inspirations of Tallis ; but-,
while they lose in pathos, they gain in majesty.
If they sometimes seem lacking in grace, they
never fail to impress us by the solidity of their
structure, and the grandeur of their massive
proportions. Fux makes Three-Part Counter
point (Tricinium) the test of real power.3 Was
ever more effect produced by three Voices than
in the following example, from the 'Songs of
Sundrie Natures.' (Lond. 1589.)
From
depths
of sinne, O Lorde,
-/KP-C
* L- I
b^ =q
^p— i
i' r"*!
, H
«7
£2.
— «.
•^'
"
r
x-
-^- -gjr cJ
•v
* 5^
^*>
l^" J- ^^-J ^* J
^* i /^
A 4
Si "
2: ^ \
9 F
r::, T
2 A complete Score will be found In the library of the Sacred
Harmonic Society. In a copy, purchased for the British Museum, in
1876, the Music allotted to each Choir is scored separately ; and
the volume concludes with a complete set of the separate Parts. In
both these examples, the original Latin words are wanting, and the
Music is adapted to some English doggrel verses of the time of King
Charles I or II. An older, and once very famous copy, in the hand
writing of John Immyns, seems to have hopelessly disappeared.
The Composition was performed, in London, many years ago.
under the direction of the late William Hawes ; and again, oa.
May 15, 1879, under that of Mr. Henry Leslie.
3 Gradus ad 1'aruassum, p. 81.
T2
276 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
to thee.
^ 9 s—
-n-rTTd-H-
^j 1 ^ ^ ~> ^~
1 J •! ' £*
£- ' -^J ^^" *-^ /"^ /*^* .rf'-j
~x-»-^_fLJ? 4
i^^ I ^ j\ i ^^
Y Tf
r '
fCi • • ", I'
— -, f „ '
^
* 1 ! b,
-- i
' ^^J
,-, ' ^ j ^j . j
r '
^^ **"> ™ r*"!
i p f i r ' -
- ' " h r -^=^ .
0
-^2-
•P--&- -^~ „
r-7
1 1 1— *1
_ 1
' .~
ff
J
— ,-j 1
~" ^ |-=y- J h^~~ 1
~^3" Cj -^
,-3 P? SZ^oltS £2 •
1 rrr
i f i
I — -3? <&-. -»- —
1 i I -<s>- f -s1- i T*~ -<^-
1 I
— - :
rn 14=^-** —
a
Though Byrd survived the i6th century by
more than 20 years, he was not the last great
Master who cultivated the true Polyphonic style
in England. It was practised, with success, by
men who were young when he was old, yet who
did not all survive him. We see a very
enchanting phase of it, in the few works of
Kichard Farranfc which have been preserved to
us. His style is, in every essential particular,
Venetian; and so closely resembles that of
Giovanni Croce, that one might well imagine the
two Masters to have studied together. Farrant
is best known by some ' Services,' and three lovely
Anthems, the authenticity of one of which —
'Lord, for Thy tender mercies' sake ' — has lately
been questioned, we think on very insufficient
grounds, and certainly in defiance of the internal
evidence afforded by the character of its Har
monies. Besides these, very few of Farrant's
works are known to be in existence. The Organ
Part of a Verse-Anthem — ' When as we sate in
Babylon ' — is preserved in the Library at Christ
Church ; together with two Madrigals, or, rather,
one Madrigal in two parts — 'Ah! Ah! alas/
and ' You salt sea gods ' j but such treasures are
exceedingly rare.
' When as we sate in Babylon.* FARRANT.
'v
Versus
.
J. 4,A
-J-,
Chorus.
m
•^ES=^=^^
fJ (ZS <Z>~*
.j. ^etc- r, ', n
=£=r^ 1, - <* 4jgq
±I_ U— f^^HiEE
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
fa
Farrant died in 1580, three years before the
birth of Orlando Gibbons, with whom the School
finished gloriously in 1625. By no Composer
was the dignity of English Cathedral Music
more nobly maintained than by this true Poly-
phonist ; who adhered to the good old rules,
while other writers were striving only to exceed
each other in the boldness of their licences. He
took licences also. No really great Master was
ever afraid of them. Josquin wrote Consecutive
Fifths. Palestrina is known to have proceeded
from an Imperfect to a Perfect Concord, by Simi
lar Motion, in Two-part Counterpoint. Luca
Marenzio has written whole chains of Ligatures,
which, if reduced to Plain Counterpoint, in ac
cordance with the stern test demanded by Fux,
would produce a dozen Consecutive Fifths in
succession. Orlando Gibbons has claimed no less
freedom, in these matters, than his predecessors.
In the ' Sanctus ' of his ' Service in F,' he wrote,
between bars 4 and 5, the most deliberate Fifths
that ever broke the rule. But he has never de
graded the pure Polyphonic style by the admixture
of foreign elements incompatible with its inmost
essence. He had the good taste to feel what the
later Italian Polyphonists never did feel, and
never could be made to understand — that the oil
of the old system could never, by any possibility,
be persuaded to combine with the wine of the
new. Of the nauseous mixtures, compounded by
Monteverde and the Prince of Venosa, we find
no trace, in any one of his writings. Free to
choose whichever style he pleased, he attached
himself to that of the Old Masters, and con
scientiously adhered to it, in spite of the tempta
tions by which he was surrounded on every side.
That he fully appreciated all that was good in
the newer method is sufficiently proved by his
Instrumental Music. His 'Fantasies of III Parts
for Viols,' and his Pieces for the Virginals, in 'Par-
thenia,' are full of quaint fancy, and greatly in
advance of the age. But in his Vocal Composi
tions, he was as true a Polyphonist as Tallis him
self. Had he taken the opposite course, he would,
no doubt, have been equally successful ; for he
would, most certainly, have been equally con-
istent. As it was, he not only did honour to the
cause he espoused, but he established an incontest
able claim to our regard as one of its brightest
ornaments. His exquisitely melodious Anthem,
br 4 Voices, 'Almighty and everlasting God,'
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
his 8-part Anthem, '0 clap your hands,' and
his magnificent 'Hosanna to the Son of David,'
for 6 Voices, are works which would have done
honour to the Roman School, in its most brilliant
period ; and, in purity of intention, and truth
fulness of expression, stand almost unrivalled.
It is not often that a School ends so nobly : but
in England, as in Venice, the last representative
of Polyphony was not its weakest champion. No
Composer of the period ever wrote anything more
worthy of preservation than the too-much-for
gotten contents of ' The First Set of Madrigals
and Mottets,' l from which we have selected the
following passage, as strikingly characteristic of
the tender pathos with which this great master
of expression was wont to temper the breadth of
his massive Harmonies, when the sentiment of the
words to which they were adapted demanded a
more gentle form of treatment than would have
been consistent with the sternness of his grander
utterances.
£**—- — t^1— -
JP-J f^ • _ ^r-,
ft__
V—*- 1 V Co*
f'
L
i r^T "|
1
jj*. ^: j^T ^ "^a
ii • p
^ ^
/* ^
?^2
<r? '
j-— ^;
^2
'r
db=
-• — &-
A ±.J,
^F=tf
-f-*-
etc.
It would be manifestly impossible, within the
limits of a sketch like the present, to give ex
amples, or even passing notices, of the works of
one tenth of the Composers who have adorned
the six great Periods of the Early English School.
With great reluctance, we must necessarily pass
over the names of John Bull, John Mundy, El way
Bevin, Ellis Gibbons, John Hilton, Michael Este,
and Adrian Batten ; of Douland, Morley, Weelkes,
Wilbye, Bennet, Forde, and our noble array of
later Madrigal writers ; and of many others, too
numerous to mention, though much too talented to
be forgotten : and we grieve the more to do so,
because these men have not been fairly treated,
either by their own countrymen or by foreigners.
1 London, 1612. No trace of the publication of any Second Set can
be discovered.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 277
The former have sinned against their School, by
neglecting its monuments. The latter, by con
temptuously ignoring the subject, without taking
the trouble to enquire whether we possess any
monuments worth preservation, or not. Time
was, when a Venetian Ambassador, writing from
the Court of King Henry VIII., could say 'We
attended High Mass, which was sung by the
Bishop of Durham, with a right noble Choir of
Discanters.' And, again, 'The Mass was sung
by His Majesty's Choristers, whose Voices are
more heavenly than human. They did not chaunt,
like men, but gave praise2 like Angels. I do
not believe the grave Bass Voices have their
equals anywhere.' If an Italian could thus
write of us, in the i6th century, it is clear that
we were not always 'an utterly unmusical
nation.'3 And, if we make it possible that such
a character should be foisted upon us, now, it
can only be, because we have so long lacked the
energy to show that we did great things, once,
and can — and mean to — do them again. English
Musicians are very angry, when foreigners tauut
them with want of musical feeling : but, surely,
they cannot hope to silence their detractors,
while they not only leave the best works of their
Old Masters unpublished, and unperformed, but
do not even care to cultivate such an acquaint
ance with them as may at least justify a critical
reference to their merits, when the existence
of English Art is called in question. We have
an early School, of which we need not be
ashamed to boast, in presence of those either
of Italy, or the Netherlands. If we do not think
it worth while to study its productions, we can
scarcely expect Italians or Germans to study
them for us; nor can we justly complain of
German or Italian critics, because, when they
hear the inanities too often sung in our most
beautiful Cathedrals, they naturally suppose that
we have nothing better to set before them. In
a later division of our subject, we shall have
occasion to speak of wasted opportunities of
later date. But we think we have here con
clusively proved, that, if our Polyphonic Schools
have not obtained due recognition upon the
Continent, in modern times, the fault lies, in a
great measure, at our own door.*
2 ' Non cantavano, ma giubilavano,' etc.
s ' Vom Anbeginn der Dinge, bis auf den heutigen Tag, eln durcb
und durcb. unmusikalisches Laud.' (Atnbros, ' Geschichte der
Musik,' Tom. lii. p. 440.) It is true that Ambros gives this, rather as
the expression of an universal opinion, on the Continent, than his
own ; and, that he afterwards criticises our best writers more fairly
than any other German author with whose works we are acquainted.
But, bis Chapter on English Music is little more than an exposition
of his own opinion of the light thrown, by modern criticism, upon
the statements made by Burney and Hawkins. A stronger instance
could hardly be given of the ignorance of the English school on the
part of German musicians than the fact that so laborious an investi
gator as Bitner, in his ' Catalogue of republications of antient music '
(Berlin 1871) omits all mention of such important collections as
Barnard's 'Selected Church Musick,' Boyce's 'Cathedral Music,'
Arnold's 'Cathedral Music,' Novello's 'Fitzwilliam Music,' Hullah's
Part Music, Vocal Scores, and Singers' Library : while in his Cata
logue of works printed during the 16th and 17th centuries (Berlin,
1877), Tallis and Gibbons are absolutely ignored, and Byrd is men
tioned only iu connection with two Madrigals in the Collection of
Thomas Watson.
Since this article was written, -we have met with an advertise
ment, mentioning the publication, at Leipzig, of 19 Madrigals, by
Dowland, Morley, and other English Composers, adapted to German
words, and edited by J. J. Meier.
273 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
XVII. A long series of progressive triumphs
is invariably followed, in the History of Art,
by a period of fatal reaction. As a general rule,
the seeds of corruption germinate so slowly that
their effect is, at first, almost imperceptible.
There are, however, exceptions to this law.
In the Music Schools of Italy, the inevitable
revolution was effected very swiftly. Scarcely
had the grave closed over the mortal remains
of Palestrina, before the principles upon which
he founded his practice were laughed into obli
vion by a band of literary savants, themselves
incapable of writing an artistic Bass to a Canto
fermo.1 The most eloquent, if not the earliest
advocates of 'reform' were, Vincenzo Galilei,
and Giovanni Battista Doni : but it was not to
them that Polyphony owed its death-blow. The
true Founder of THE SCHOOLS OF THE DECADENCE
was Claudio Monteverde, in whose Madrigals
the rule which forbids the use of Unprepared
Discords in Strict Counterpoint was first openly
disregarded. In the next division of our subject,
we shall have occasion to describe this once cele
brated Composer as a genius of the highest order :
but we cannot so speak, here, of the ruthless
destroyer of a system which, after so many
years of earnest striving for perfection, attained
it, at last, in the Later Roman School. It was
in building up a new School, on a new founda
tion, that Monteverde showed his greatness, not
in his attempts to improve upon the praxis of the
Polyphonic Composers. Without good Counter
point, good Polyphony cannot exist: and his
Counterpoint, even before he boldly set its laws
at defiance, was so defective, that the conclusion
that he discarded it, in despair of ever satisfacto
rily mastering its difficulties, is inevitable. It is,
indeed, much to be regretted that he did not
give up the struggle at an earlier period, and
devote to the advancement of Monodia the ener
gies, which, when brought to bear upon the
work of his immediate predecessors, were pro
ductive of nothing but evil : for, however grate
fully we may welcome his contributions to the
Lyric Drama, we cannot quite so cordially thank
him for such attempts to * rival the harmonies
of midnight cats,' as the following passage from
his ' Vesperse,' composed for the Cathedral of
S. Mark — a triumph of cacophony which the
Prince of Venosa himself might justly have
envied.
S3"
- : gi ^
-S-
-. -pr -^
etc.
- — £=
i^ — —
i See MONODIA ; MONTEVEEDE ; MASS, vol. ii. p. 231.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
In one country alone did the Period of the
Decadence produce fruit worthy of preservation.
Its effect upon Venetian Music is shown in
these 'Vesperse.' In Rome, it formed so serious
an hindrance to productive power, that it con
tributed absolutely nothing to the repertoire of
the Pontifical Chapel. But, in England, it gave
birth to the Glee, a form of Composition quite
distinct from the German Part-Song, and of in
finitely higher interest ; and of so truly national
a character, that it has never, in one single
instance, been produced in any other country
than our own, or set to other than English
words, for which reasons it is doubtful whether
full justice could be done to it by any but
English Singers. The true relation of the Glee
to the older forms of Polyphony will be best un
derstood by comparing the latest English Madri
gals with the works of the earliest Glee writers ;
using the Canzonets of such Composers as Dow-
land and Ford, as connecting links between the
productions of Weelkes, Bateson, and Morley, on
the one hand, and those of Battishill, Stevens,
and Cooke, on the other. This will show, that,
notwithstanding the length of time interposed be
tween the two styles, and the consequent diverg
ence of their tonalities — the use of the Antient
Modes having died out with the Madrigal — the
newer form could by no possibility have come
into existence except upon the ruins of the older
one ; and it is strange that this last remnant of
Polyphony should be found in the country which
boasts the earliest specimen of the Art that has
as yet been brought to light.
With this beautiful creation, the old rfyime
came absolutely to an end : and it now remains for
us to trace the rise and progress of the Monodic
Schools.
XVIII. THE MONODIC SCHOOL OF FLORENCE
presents one of the strangest anomalies to be
found in the annals of Art ; inasmuch as it
originated in no natural process of development,
but owed its existence to a theory, which, though
altogether wild and visionary in itself, led to re
sults both practical and enduring, and culminated
in the invention of the Lyric Drama.3 The
Founders of the School were Peri and Caccini,
with whom its first period expired. Its prin
ciples were so violently opposed to those by
which alone the greatest Composers of the two
preceding centuries had been guided, that we
can only look upon it as an entirely new mani
festation of genius — a new beginning, cut off, by
an impassable gulf, from all that had previously
existed. Its disciples, holding Counterpoint in
undisguised contempt, substituted, in its place,
a simple form of irregularly-constructed Melody,
easy to sing, but stiff and unattractive to the
last degree, and supported only by a Thorough
bass, as simple as itself, and, if possible, still
more devoid of interest. This, as exemplified
in the 'Nuove Musiche' of Caccini, and Peri's
' Euridice,' was a poor exchange, indeed, for the
glories of Polyphony. But, the life and soul of the
School lay in its declamatory power. By means
a See vol. ii. pp. 497—500. Also. MONODIA, PEEI, CACCINI.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
of this, its leaders appealed, at once, to the hearts
of their hearers. If they did not, themselves,
attain to the expression of deep pathos, or grand
dramatic truth, they led the way to both. And,
in this new feature, lay the secret, not only of
their own immediate success, in Florence, but,
of the amazing rapidity with which their prin
ciples gained ground, elsewhere, and the avidity
with which they were received by the most
talented writers of the period. In spite of its
monotony, its crudeness, its poverty, its faults of
every conceivable kind, the Monodic School of
Florence, dowered with this one virtue, was en
abled, even in its infancy, to make an impres
sion upon Art which has never yet been ob
literated : and nowhere is that impression more
clearly traceable than upon the latest produc
tions of our own enlightened age.
XIX. Of THE SCHOOL OF MANTUA, Monte-
verde was the beginning, and the end.1 Though
he did not originate the idea of the Opera, he
won for it such high distinction, at the Court of
Vincenzo Gonzaga, that the efforts of its Floren
tine parents attracted, thenceforward, but very
little notice. In presence of his ' Orfeo' it was
impossible that Peri's ' Euridice' could continue
to live. Neither in dramatic power, nor in com
mand of the heterogeneous orchestra of the period,
did any contemporaneous writer approach him;
and to this circumstance he was mainly indebted
for his most brilliant successes. He seemed to
have been created for the age, and the age for
him. Since the Florentine Masters had shown
that dramatic effect was possible, Artists saw a
new world open to them ; and, in their eagerness
to enter it, were ready to cast down and destroy
every obstacle that lay in their way. Monte-
verde had wisdom enough to seize the oppor
tunity, and genius enough to use it splendidly.
He wrote with growing appreciation of the
capabilities of the Stage ; and introduced new
ideas into every new work. A nd therefore it is,
that, though the School of Mantua boasts only
a very few achievements, and these all by one
Composer, we look upon it as one of the most
important Schools that have ever existed.
XX. THE VENETIAN DRAMATIC SCHOOL
was founded, in the year 1637, by Benedetto
Ferrari, and Francesco Manelli, whose labours
were crowned, from the first, with abundant suc
cess, though the merits of their Compositions
were eclipsed in 1639 by the triumphant recep
tion of Monteverde's * L'Adone/ and an almost
equally popular work, ' Le Nozze di Peleo e di
Tetide,' by his pupil Cavalli.2 The veteran
Monteverde, then Maestro di Cappella at S.
Mark's, won scarcely less honour in Venice
than he had already earned at Mantua. Cavalli
proved himself a worthy disciple of so distin
guished a Master ; and, though he found a for
midable rival in Marc Antonio Cesti, one of
Carissimi's most talented pupils, he secured to
himself a long-enduring fame. Monteverde died
1 See MONTEVEBDE. Also, vol. ii. pp. 500-501.
2 See vol. ii. pp. 602-504.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 279
in 1643 ; but under Cesti and Cavalli, and a
long line of successors fully capable of carrying
on their work, the School retained, for many
years, the prestige of its early successes, and was
long regarded as the best in Italy. During
its reign, a more flowing style of Melody gradu
ally replaced the monotonous Recitative of Cac-
cini and Peri. The Eitornello3 was accepted as
an adjunct to the Aria. And many other improve
ments were added, from time to time, until, by
the close of the century, the Lyric Drama had
attained a position in Venice which excited the
envy of every rival School in Europe.
XXI. The early records of THE NEAPOLITAN
DRAMATIC SCHOOL are very imperfect ; but, our
ignorance of the work effected by its older Masters
is of little importance, in the presence of its most
brilliant ornament, Alessandro Scarlatti, who,
though he laboured so long in Rome, is justly
claimed by the Neapolitans as their own inalien
able property. The vocal works of this great
genius are known, to most of us, only through
a few fragmentary Songs, which, though they
delight all who hear them, have not yet tempted
any publisher to issue a more extended selec
tion from his works, very few of which were
printed, even during his own lifetime. It is only
by a very rare chance that one is fortunate
enough, nowadays, to meet with an Opera by
Scarlatti, even in MS. We have, however, a
few trustworthy Scores, in some of our public
libraries. A complete copy of 'II Prigioniero
fortunate' will be found among the Dragonetti
MSS. in the British Museum ; and the Library
of Christ Church, Oxford, possesses a Serenata,
12 Cantatas, and three perfect Operas — ' Gerone'
(dated '1692 e scritta 1693'), 'II Flavio Cuni-
berto,' and 'La Teodora Augusta,' all deeply
interesting to the student, and rich, not only in
fine Songs, but also in charming Ritornelli, for the
Stringed Band, interposed between the various
Scenes of the Drama. ' II Flavio Cuniberto ' be
gins with a regular Overture, called e Sinfonia
avanti V Opera,' and consisting of a Fugue, on
two Subjects, in B Minor, and a Minuet, in 6-8
Time, in the same key. ' Gerone,' and ' La
Teodora Augusta,' both contain Airs, for So
prano, with Trumpet Obbligato, exhibiting more
than the germ of that Art-form which afterwards
culminated in ' Hor la tromba,' and ' Let the bright
Seraphim.' ' La Teodora ' contains a Sinfonia,
with an Obbligato Trumpet. The following ex
tract is from the Trumpet Air in ' Gerone.'
, Tromba
3 See vol. ill. p. 137.
280 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
-•-(-
etc.
etc
Scarcely less talented than Scarlatti himself was
Francesco de' Rossi, a Canon of Bari,whose Operas,
'II Sejano moderno della Tracia,' 'Clorilda,' 'La
pena degl' oechi,' and 'Mitrane,' met with great
success, in the latter half of the I7th century.
' Mitrane' contains a Scena, 'Ah, rendimi quel
core,' far in advance of its age, and even now a
great favourite with Contralto Singers equal to
its demands.1 Fr. de' Rossi also wrote much
excellent Sacred Music ; though, in this he was
excelled by Alessandro Stradella, who was cer
tainly a Neapolitan by birth, if not by residence.2
The earnest labours of these able men prepared
the way for still greater work in the future. Not
only were Artists alive to the importance of the
Musical Drama ; but, the people themselves were
taught to love it, until it became as dear to them
as the fun of the Carnival. And when, in later
years, a race of Composers arose, who appealed
directly to their sympathies, the Sovereignty of
Art was gradually transferred from Venice to
Naples, which, in the next century, became a
more important centre of production than the
City of the Doges.
XXII. The services rendered to the cause of
Art by the Polyphonic Schools of Germany
seem very poor indeed, compared with the work
wrought, at a later period, in her Schools of In
strumental Music, which speedily rose to emin
ence, after the death of Hans Leo Hasler, of
whose long-felt influence we have already spoken
in Section XIII of the present Article.
The most noticeable feature in THE GERMAN
SCHOOLS OF THE I7TH CENTURY was the great
prominence given to the Organ, in all their pro
ductions. After the Reformation, the Choral
was always supported by an Organ Accom
paniment ; and the mechanism of the Instrument
attained, in Germany, a degree of perfection else
where unknown, except perhaps in Venice. But
the Organ was not employed alone. The ' Syn
tagma musicum ' ofMichaelPrsetorius, printed in
161 2-18, contains descriptions, and engravings, of
' all manner of Instruments ' in common use at
the time it was written ; and thus throws much
valuable light, not only upon the progress of
Instrumental Music among the author's own
countrymen, but, upon the Orchestras employed
by the Composers of the Monodic School in
Italy. Prsetorius himself wa-s an ardent sup
porter of the rising School, and enriched it with
a long list of Compositions, most of which are
now utterly unknown ; partly, no doubt, on ac
count of the extreme rarity of the original
i See SCENA, TV, vol. iii. p. 210.
z gee vol. il. pp. 501-505, and 537-538.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
editions, which have never been reprinted; but
more, it is to be feared, because critical writers,
even in Germany, have been too much blinded
by the splendid achievements of Graun, and
the Bach family, to give due attention to the
period which prepared the way even for Seb.
Bach himself. Yet, the annals of this period
account for facts in the history of to-day, which,
without their help, would be inexplicable. It
has long been assumed that Melody and Har
mony, form the distinguishing characteristics of
Italian and German Music, respectively; and,
that this circumstance is to be accounted for by
the light and careless nature of the Italians, and
the studious habits of the Germans. There may
be a certain amount of surface truth involved in
the idea : but we, who live in the century which
produced an Italian Baini, and a German Offen
bach — both types of tolerably large classes — can
scarcely be persuaded to receive it uncondition
ally. The difference between German and Italian
Music is traceable, step by step, to a far more
definite and satisfactory origin than this. In
toxicated with the prejudices of the Renaissance,
the leaders of the Florentine Monodic School held
Counterpoint in equal hatred and contempt ; not
from any logical objection to its laws — which they
never troubled themselves to learn — but, because
the Art was unknown to Classical Antiquity.
They therefore determined to reject, entirely,
the experience of the Masters who preceded
them, and to build their style upon a new foun
dation, which demanded nothing beyond a
Melody, more or less expressive, supported by a
more or less simple Accompaniment ; and this
principle has been accepted, as the basis of the
Italian style, from their day to ours. But, no
such principle was ever accepted in Germany.
The lithe motion of Hasler's contrapuntal invo
lutions was as much appi-eciated, in Vienna, as in
Nuremberg : and, when the progress of Instru
mental Music demanded still greater freedom,
the laws of Counterpoint were modified to suit
the exigencies of the occasion ; the antient Modes
were abandoned in favour of more modern tonal
ities ; and just so much innovation as was found
absolutely necessary was freely permitted, while
everything in the older system not essentially
incompatible with the change of circumstances
was thankfully retained, not from respect for its
antiquity, but from sincere conviction of its last
ing value. Unlike Peri, and Monteverde, the
German Masters destroyed nothing. They were
content to work on, upon the old foundations ; in
troducing, from time to time, whatever changes
the spirit of the age dictated, and wholly undis
turbed by that visionary restoration of Hellenic
Tragedy which formed the mainspring of the
Italian revolution. And thus it happened, that
the Strict Counterpoint of the i6th century gave
place to the modern system of Part- writing, which
Las, ever since, formed the true strength, not only
of every German School, but every German Com
poser, from Bach to Brahms ; while, by confining
its attention entirely to Melody, thepedantryofthe
Renaissance gave birth, in Italy, to another style,
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
from which every Italian Composer, from Mon-
teverde to Rossini, has drawn his most graceful
inspirations, and his most captivating effects.
Let us be equally thankful for both ; while, by
a careful study of their respective histories, we
strive to attain the power of justly appreciating
their respective merits.
XXIII. Jean Baptiste Lulli, the founder of
THE FRENCH SCHOOL OF THE 17™ CENTURY,
though an Italian by birth, was so thoroughly a
Frenchman in taste and feeling, as well as by
education, that his actual parentage may well be
forgotten, in his attachment to the country of
his naturalisation. His style, though resembling
in certain technical points that of the Monodic
School of Italy, differs so widely from it in
character and expression, that it can only be
fairly judged as an original creation. Moreover,
his instrumental works, and especially the Over
tures to his dramatic pieces, prove him to have
attained considerable proficiency in the modern
ised form of Counterpoint called Part-writing,
and to have known how to use it with so much
originality of form, and breadth of effect, that the
particular type of Orchestral Prelude which he
undoubtedly invented, soon came to be regarded
as an indispensable introduction to the Lyric
Drama. Technically, this Fugued Prelude
brought him into somewhat close relation with
the German Schools ; yet, his manner was even
less German than Italian. In truth, his obliga
tions to the great Masters of other countries
were so slight, that the style he gave to France
may be described as, in every essential particular,
hia own. That he trained no body of admiring
disciples to follow in his steps will not seem sur
prising to those who have read his biography;
and so it happened, that, for nearly half a cen
tury after his death, very little, if any progress
was made : yet, he none the less gave France a
national School, in which her own children were
not slow to distinguish themselves, at a later
period. Both the 'Opera Comique,' and the
'Vaudeville,' though moulded into their now
universally accepted forms at a period long subse
quent to his decease, owe much of their distinctive
character to the impress of his genius ; which
also exercised a remarkable influence upon the
development of the 'Grand Ope"ra,' not only in
its earlier stages, but even after it had made
considerable advance towards maturity. Indeed,
the principles upon which he worked have under
gone wonderfully little radical change since the
close of the I7th century; while the general
characteristics of his School are clearly recog
nisable in works which have long been accepted
as embodiments of the popular taste of a far
more modern epoch. For instance, the following
bright little Melody from his once popular Opera,
' Roland,' breathes the spirit of Lutetian gaiety
no less freely than many a set of Couplets by
Boieldieu, or He"rold, though it was written
more than a century before even Gluck's first
appearance in Paris.1
i MS. Scores of 8 of LulH's Operas will be found in the Dragonetti
Collection, in the British Museum.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 281
$
/> : P --.--• — 1 *-!• r
Tl 1
tJ
Ai-mez, ai-mez, Ro-land a vo-tre
)'tf /* : ^ 13 =r—
tour, 11 n'est
— ^ : r -T ^—
6
—
*"• m in -f^ P r i i Pi
• * A '(I
— • F i j L-) r j
1 r 1 'II
j___ 1 i 1 _ ' — ' ta^
point de cli- mats oil sa gloi - re ne vo - - - le:
.
• i
— iis' — — ^ — ~ ff^- — " ~t
s^ -^1
6 56
\ \ \ r^> * » Jt_ «
rd a • », »
' " 0
•1 c> • *
1 '
Du moins la fier - t6 se con - so - le, Quand la gloi -re I'o -
-<5>-- - ...
r-" • i* * <
,
• *
f°- •
" _ 1
,
1
1 . II
6 » 6 B *
\ k_ i
(^ ^ ,
« • a £
• -rJ • ^4 •
blige a ce - - der a 1'a - mour. etc.
V "4 "
^a
_ - H '"
6 ait •&-
XXIV. THE ENGLISH SCHOOL OF THE
CENTURY was, in many respects, a very advanced
one ; though its triumphs were of a varied charac
ter. Orlando Gibbons cannot be reckoned
among its Masters, because, although he lived
until the year 1625, his method, his style, and
his predilections, were wholly with the cinquecen-
tisti. The period which followed was not pro
mising. The disturbed state of the kingdom,
during the reign of Charles I., and the progress
of the Great Rebellion, necessarily exercised a
fatal influence on the development of Art ; yet,
the latter half of the century was extraordinarily
productive, and the period which we shall dis
tinguish as that of THE SCHOOL OF THE RESTORA
TION gave birth to a distinct race of Composers
of more than ordinary talent, as well as to a new
style, which owes so many of its distinguishing
features to the political and social changes of the
period, that, without recalling these, it would
be impossible to explain how it ever came into
existence at all.
The healthy and universal love for Art, which,
in the beginning of the century, led to the recog
nition of the Madrigal as a national institution,
and the Anthem as an indispensable feature in
the Services of the Church, died out completely,
during the short but eventful period of neglect
and confusion interposed between the death of
King Charles I. and the Restoration. The Puri
tans hated the Music of the Anglican Church
most cordially. They regarded the destruction
of every Organ and Office-Book which fell into
their hands, as a religious duty ; and, to the
zeal with which they carried out their infamous
system of spoliation, we are indebted for the
loss of many a treasure bequeathed to us by
our older Schools. Condemning all aspirations
after the Beautiful as snares of the Evil One,
they would not even suffer their children to be
282 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
taught to sing ; and those who had been taught,
in happier times, were speedily losing the youth
ful freshness of their Voices, now doomed to per
petual silence. This bigotry of the Roundheads
put an end to all hope of progress : but, happily,
their term of power came to an end, before the
traditions of the past were entirely forgotten.
Men, who had done good service, before their
career was interrupted by the Civil War, were
still living, when, in the year 1660, the Restora
tion of Charles II. inaugurated a brighter future
for music ; and, to one of these the ' Merrie
Monarch ' wisely entrusted the reconstruction of
the Choir of the Chapel Royal.1
Henry Cook, the new * Master of ye Children,'
had himself sung in the Chapel, as a Chorister,
in the days of King Charles I. ; and afterwards
attained some reputation as a Composer : but, on
the breaking out of the Rebellion, he relinquished
his studies, for the purpose of joining the Royal
Army; and in 1642 obtained a Captain's Commis
sion, on which account he was afterwards known as
Captain Cook. It has been said that his military
prowess was greater than his musical talent ; yet
it is certain that he trained more than one of the
best Composers of the rising School, and trained
them well, though not without the assistance of
able coadjutors. Among these learned colleagues
were three quondam Choristers — Edward Lowe,
Christopher Gibbons (the son of Orlando), and
William Child, who, on the King's return, were
appointed joint Organists of the Chapel. Another
member of the older staff — Henry Lawes — was
restored to Office, as Clerk of the Cheque, and
commissioned to compose the Music for the ap
proaching Coronation.2 The Music played by the
'Sagbutts and Cornets,' during the triumphal
Procession from the Tower to Whitehall, was
written by an old Chorister of Exeter Cathedral,
Matthew Lock. This accomplished Musician
performed his task so successfully, that he was
immediately promoted to the Office of Composer
in ordinary to the King ; and, in that capacity, at
once began to furnish new Music for the resus
citated Choir, and to assist his trusty fellow-
labourers in their endeavour to recover the ground
which had been lost. But, there were grave
difficulties in the way. So many old Part-Books
had been destroyed, that, had it not been for Bar
nard's ' First Book of Selected Church Musick,'3
there would have been little left to sing. More
over, the difficulty of procuring Choir-Boys, in
the face of Puritan superstition, was almost in
superable. In many Cathedrals, this dearth of
Treble Voices led, not only to the extensive em
ployment of adult falsetti, but even to the sub
stitution of Cornets for the Vocal Parts. Captain
Cook, however, was fortunate enough to secure,
for the Chapel Royal, a small body of Choristers,
1 That Is to say, the Chapel attached to the Palace at Whitehall,
destroyed by fire Jan. 5, 1698.
2 According to Sir Eichard Baker's Chronicle. Matthew Lock com
posed the Music for King Charles's public entry; and Captain Cook,
that sung at the Coronation. Probably, Cook and Lawes each con
tributed a portion of the latter. At any rate, it is certain that
Lawes composed the Anthem, 'Zadok the Priest.'
3 See vol. i. p. 140.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
of superlative excellence, three of whom — Pel-
ham Humfrey, John Blow, and Michael Wise —
came at once to the front, and, before many
years had passed, were openly recognised as the
Founders of the new School. Strengthened by
the Voices of these talented Boys, the Choir could
scarcely fail to flourish ; though its management
was no easy task. The King, whose taste had
been formed on the Continent, regarded the grand
conceptions of Tallis and Byrd, and the solemn
tones of the Organ, with far less favour than the
lighter strains of the contemporary French School,
and the more brilliant effect of a full Orchestra.
He therefore filled the Organ-loft of the Chapel
Royal with a band of Viols, Sagbutts, and Cornets;
and, in order that they might produce the greater
effect, commanded his Composers to intersperse
their Anthems with a goodly proportion of cheer
ful Ritornelli, adapted to the powers of the
new Instruments. They obeyed, of course, to
the best of their ability. But, neither Lowe,
nor Chr. Gibbons, nor even the more melodious
Child, took kindly to the new French style, which
must have sounded strange indeed to ears so long
accustomed to the Polyphony of a byegone age.
The two first-named Organists, indeed, contri
buted comparatively little Music of any kind to
the repertoire of the newly-organised Choir : but
Dr. Child was a voluminous Composer ; and his
works, though they will not bear comparison
with those of Orlando Gibbons, retain much of
his breadth of manner, and, notwithstanding
their flowing vein of melody, show little affinity
with the more modern Monodia which the King
desired his Musicians to cultivate. Henry Lawes,
on the contrary, was a zealous disciple of the
Monodic School; and chiefly delighted in the
confection of Ssecular Songs, which, though cele
brated enough in their own day, and commended,
by some of the best Poets of the age, for their
prosodial accuracy, lack the genial freshness which
alone can invest such works with enduring in
terest. There can be no doubt that in England,
as well as in Italy, the earliest productions of the
Monodic sera were pervaded by a perhaps un
avoidable spirit of pedantry, which, however
valuable it may have been as a preparation for
better things, proved fatal to their own longevity.
Beyond this transitional point Lawes never
soared ; and hence it is, that, while his Songs
are now known only to the Antiquary, some of
those written by his contemporary, Matthew Lock
— who was, in every way, a greater Musician,
and gifted with an infinitely richer imagination,
and a far more liberal share of natural talent —
are as popular to-day, as they were 200 years
ago. There are, indeed, passages in Lock's
Music to Macbeth, which can never grow old.
Such Movements as ' When cattle die, about we
go,' 'Let's have a dance upon the heath,' and the
Echo Chorus, 'At the Night-Raven's dismal
voice, 'would have been welcomed as delightful
novelties, in the days of Sir Henry Bishop;
while the dramatic power exhibited in the Music
to the Third Act is quite strong enough to give
colour to the theory which has been sometimes
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
entertained, that Purcell himself made a tran
script of the work, in the days of his youth, for
purposes of study.1
Yet, even this was not enough to meet the
demands of the age. Subsequent events proved
that the King expected greater things than
either Lawes or Lock could produce; and he
gained his end by a clever stroke of policy.
Attracted by the evident talent of the new
' Children,' he encouraged them, not only to
sing their best, but to make attempts at Com
position, also. An opportunity for testing their
proficiency in this more difficult branch of Art
was soon found. To celebrate a Victory over
the Dutch Fleet,2 a Thanksgiving Anthem was
needed, at a few hours' notice. The news of the
capture of the Enemy's ships arrived on a Satur
day; and, finding that the King expected the
Music to be performed on the following day, the
Composers attached to the Chapel unanimously
declined the task of furnishing it. The Choir
had, by this time, been reinforced by a second
set of Choristers, among whom were Thomas
Tudway, William Turner, and the greatest genius
of the age, Henry Purcell. Such a company of
Choir-Boys had probably never before, and has,
certainly, never since, been gathered together.
And its youthful members must have been well
aware of their own value ; for three of them —
Humfrey, Blow, and Turner — undertook the task
which their elders had declined, and jointly pro
duced the so-called 'Club-Anthem,' 'I will alway
give 3 thanks,' Humfrey furnishing the first Move
ment, Turner the second, and Blow the concluding
Chorus. This, at least, is the origin ascribed to that
once-famous Composition, by Dr. Tudway : and,
though the authority of his personal recollection
must be weighed against certain chronological
difficulties with which the subject is surrounded,4
it is clear that the youth of the associated Com
posers tends in no wise to diminish the credibility
of the story; for, as early as Nov. 22, 1663, Pepys
tells us that ' The Anthem was good after Ser
mon, being the 5ist Psalme, made for five Voices
by one of Captain Cooke's Boys, a pretty Boy.
And they say there are four or five of them that
can do as much.' The ' pretty Boy ' was, in all
probability, Pelham himself, then between 15 and
16 years old : and we are quite safe in regarding
him, and his 'four or five' fellow-Choristers, as the
true Founders of the School of the Restoration.
The basis upon which this School was built
was an entirely new Art-form, as original in its
conception, and as purely English in its charac
ter, as the Glee. What the Motet was, to the
School which preceded the change of Religion,
and the Full- Anthem to that which immediately
followed it, the Verse- Anthem was to the School
we are now considering. Designed, in the first
instance, to gratify King Charles's 'brisk and
airy' taste, this new creation, notwithstanding
1 See vol. H. pp. 183—185.
3 Possibly, the capture of 135 Dutch vessels, In 1664, before war
was actually declared.
3 A copy of this Authem will be found in vol. 1U. of the 'Tudway
Collection,' in the British Museum.
* See vol. i. p. 797. note.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 283
the name universally applied to it, bore far less
resemblance to the Anthem, properly so called,
than to the more modern Cantata ; from which
it differed, chiefly, in that it was written, in most
cases, for a greater number of Voices, that it was
supported by an Organ Accompaniment, and that
it invariably terminated, even if it did not begin,
with a Chorus. Its Movements were usually
short ; and written in a style partaking pretty
equally of the more salient features of rhythmic
Melody and Accompanied Recitative. Frequent
Ritornelli were introduced, in obedience to the
King's express command ; and the general cha
racter of the whole was more florid, by many
degrees, than anything that had yet been heard
in English Church Music, and so ai-ranged as to
display the Solo Voices to the best advantage.
Verse passages — i.e. passages for Solo Voices —
were also freely introduced into the newer ' Ser
vices,' from which the Fugal Imitations of the
1 6th century were gradually eliminated, in order
to prepare the way for a more flowing style of
Melody. Sometimes, though not very frequently,
these passages were varied, as in the Verse An
them, by the interpolation of .Instrumental Ritor
nelli; while the venerable Gregorian Psalm-Tones
were gradually replaced, first by the Single, and
afterwards by the Double Chaunt.
Pelham Humfrey was the first Composer who
achieved any real success in this new style of
Composition. On the breaking of his Voice, he
was sent, at the King's expense, to the Continent,
where he studied, for some time, under Lulli.
Pepys speaks of his return to England, ' an abso
lute Monsieur,' in November, 1667. That he
was by that time thoroughly imbued, both with
the principles and the practice of the French
School, there can be no doubt. But, he was no
servile imitator, even of Lulli. There is a grace,
even in his boldest Licences, that at once pro
claims him a true genius ; and an originality in
his method which would have stamped him fbr
ever as a Master, even had he found no followers
to assist him in forming a School. He delighted
in the use of the Chromatic Semitone, and other
Intervals rigidly excluded from the works of the
older Contrapuntists ; and produced new, and ex
tremely pleasing effects, by the constant alter
nation of his Solo Voices, to which he allotted
short responsive phrases, contrasted together in
delightful variety, and always so contrived as to
give due prominence to the meaning of the Sacred
Text. All these peculiarities of manner he shared
so liberally with his Choir-mate, Michael Wise,
that the points of resemblance between the styles
of the two Masters are almost innumerable. In
flowing grace, and tenderness of expression, they
were so nearly equal that it is sometimes impos
sible to choose between them. In no essential
particular does the method of Part- writing origi
nated by the one differ from that adopted by the
other. Their works are designed upon an exactly
similar plan, and are evidently based upon ex
actly similar intentions. But, in sustaining
power, the advantage was decidedly in Humfrey 'a
favour. His phrases are always compact, and
284 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
firmly knit together in true logical sequence;
while, as a general rule, the Anthems of Wise
are broken into an infinity of fragmentary pas
sages, which, despite their pleasing changes of
expression, lack the continuity of idea which
undoubtedly gives a higher tone to many of
Humfrey's more fully developed Movements.
Blow treated the Verse Anthem somewhat
differently. Without seriously interfering, either
with its general intention, or with the rough
outline of its curiously irregular form, he not
only developed it at greater length than had
before been attempted, but contrived to clothe
it with a certain individuality which marks a
clear stage on the path of progress. Though
unable to compete with Humfrey, or Wise, in
gentleness of expression, he was always melo
dious, and always interesting ; and if, in some of
his more ambitious works — as, for instance, his
two most popular Anthems, ' I was in the spirit,'
and, 'I beheld, and lo! a great multitude" — he
failed to reach the sublimity of the Text he illus
trated, he undoubtedly prepared the way for
greater things. His full Anthems — such as 'The
Lord hear thee,' and ' God is our hope ' — are
written in a style more broad and forcible than
that of either of his talented rivals; and his
Services are admirable : yet he has not always
received full justice at the hands of modern critics.
Burney, generally so fair, and courteous, even in
his censures, fills four crowded pages with ex
amples of ' Dr. Blow's crudities'; a large propor
tion of which are less harsh, by far, than many
a cutting discord in daily use among more modern
Composers; while others — like the 'monstrous
combinations 'so severely condemned by the editor
of Byrd's 'Cantiones Sacrse' — are clearly founded
upon clerical errors in the older copies. The
truth is, neither Burney, nor Horsley, seem to
have attached sufficient significance to the fact,
that, in the matter of Licences, our English
composers were always in advance of their Con
tinental contemporaries.1 We cannot ignore this
peculiarity : and, (making due allowance for self-
evident misprints,) it would be much better to
accept it as a characteristic of our national style —
which^t certainly is — than to join with Burney in
abusing the taste of our forefathers, or to say,
with Horsley, that ' their practice was bad,' with
regard to progressions, which, even when satis
factorily proved against them, are found, in many
cases, to be perfectly defensible. There is, surely,
very little to censure, in the following example J
from Blow; while the 'monstrous' G|j, in that
from Byrd, is evidently intended for E, in response
to the Altus in the preceding bar.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
(Condemned by Dr. Burney).
DR. BLOW.
_, i%— ^5— v-^f— •— «—
-ii.: '
{( ) * " . • — •
My heart is af - flict - ed
etc.
P=JJSZ-+— • r — 1
— i _ — _
1 See vol. ii. p. 1926. We must, however, except the progressions
affected by Monteverde, and Gesualdo, Prince of Venosa— two Com
posers whose taste for cacophony has never been rivalled.
(Condemned by W. Horsley.)
se - de sane - tu
n 1 i A _ Kl (W. BVRD.
H- _1 1 &£ <=) , 1 1
_^?..
' ^"fljs
S^-T^ z=t-ef-jr-
se - de sane - tu.
•JLJ.
rp— ftP" ~ ^ ^ |i
^-nr
F=fy?=
uS. etc-
rfg. \(S~-
3 «
Passing on to the second set of Choristers, we
find Drs. Turner and Tudway doing good work
in their generation, though distinguished by far
less brilliant talents than their more illustrious
predecessors. But, the works of these really ac
complished writers will bear no comparison with
those of their great contemporary, Henry Purcell,
a genius of whom any country might well have
been proud.
It is difficult to say whether the English School
owes most to PurcelTs Compositions for the
Church or for the Theatre ; for he wrote with
equal success for both ; displaying in his Sacred
Music the gravity inseparable from a devout
appreciation of its true purpose ; and in his
Operas a greater amount of dramatic power than
had ever before been exhibited by any of his
countrymen, and more than had often been heard,
even in Venice. In every branch of the Art he
practised he was invariably in advance of his age ;
not by a few short decads, but, by little less than
a century. This assertion may seem extravagant,
but it is capable of plain demonstration. Pur-
cell wrote his Music to ' The Tempest,' including
' Full fathom five' and ' Come unto these yellow
sands/ in 1690. Dr. Arne wrote his, including
' Where the bee sucks,' in 1 746. Yet, the style
is as advanced — we might almost say, as modern
— in the one case, as in the other, and as little
likely to be set aside as ' old-fashioned.' It may
be said that the difference of calibre between
Purcell and Arne is too great to justify the
mention of their names in the same breath.
It may be so. But our argument extends to
greater men than Arne. Seb. Bach, who was
exactly 10 years and 8 months old on the day of
Purcell's death, astonishes us by the flexibility
of his Part- writing, in which the most beautiful
effects are constantly produced by means of
Intervals sedulously avoided by the older Contra
puntists. In all this, Purcell was beforehand
with the German Master. In his well-known
Anthem, ' O give thanks,' he uses the Diminished
Fourth, at the words, ' He is gracious/ with an
effect as pathetic as that which Bach draws from
it in the * Passion Music.' We do not say that
he was the first to employ this beautiful Interval
— for it was used by Orlando Gibbons :2 but, he
was the first to make it a prominent feature;
and the first to demonstrate its true place in the
Gamut of Expression. Again, in the splendid
'Te Deum' and 'Jubilate' composed for S.
Cascilia's Day, 1694, and afterwards sung, for
1 8 years successively, in S. Paul's Cathedral, at
the Festival of the Sons of the Clergy, there are
2 See the last bar but one of our example, on p. 277 of this volume.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
passages of the most advanced character : notably
one, beginning at the eighth bar of the intro
ductory Symphony, in which the Discords struck
by the Trumpets are resolved by the Violins,
and vice versa, with a boldness which has never
been exceeded.
Trumpets Violins
r r
Tr.
Viol. Tr.
jJ^JLjCSi
Tutti
J
r
! J
fs
««
* <
1 1 .
* •
— "^
*
z
p
L
r-'
r^l
r
etc.
F
— 1
— 1-
— & —
657
It would be difficult to find two passages more
unlike each other, in detail and expression, than
this, and the alternate Chords for Stringed and
Wind Instruments in Beethoven's 1 Symphony in
C minor : yet, in principle, they are absolutely
identical, both owing their origin to a construc
tive peculiarity which Purcell turned to good
account more than a hundred years before the
idea suggested itself to Beethoven. And this is
not the only remarkable point in the first English
'Te Deum' that was ever enriched with full
Orchestral Accompaniments. The alternation
of Solo Voices and Chorus is managed with ex
quisite skill ; and sometimes — as at the words
'To Thee Cherubim,' and 'Holy, Holy, Holy,'— *
produces quite an unexpected, though a perfectly
legitimate effect. The Fugal Points, in the more
important Choruses, though developed at no
great length, are treated with masterly clearness,
and a grandeur of conception well worthy of the
sublime Poetry to which the Music is wedded.
The Instrumentation, too, is admirable, through
out, notwithstanding the limited resources of the
Orchestra ; the clever management of the Trum-
-pets — the only Wind Instruments employed —
producing an endless variety of contrast, which,
conspicuous everywhere, reaches its climax in
the opening Movement of the ' Jubilate ' — an
Alto Solo, with Trumpet oblligato — in which the
colouring is as strongly marked as in the master
pieces of the 1 8th century. Judged as a whole,
this splendid work may fairly be said to unite
all the high qualities indispensable to a Com-
•position of the noblest order. The simplicity of
its outline could scarcely be exceeded ; yet it is
conceived on the grandest possible scale, and
elaborated with an earnestness of purpose which
proves its Composer to have been not merely a
learned Musician, and a man of real genius, but
also a profound thinker. And it is precisely to
this earnestness of purpose, this careful thought,
this profound intention, that PurcelTs Music
» See vol. 11. p. 5706.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 285
owes its immeasurable superiority to that of the
best of his fellow-labourers. We recognise the
influence of a great Ideal in everything he
touches ; in his simplest Melodies, as clearly as
in his more highly finished Cantatas ; in his
Birthday Odes, and Services, no less than in his
magnificent Verse Anthems — the finest examples
of the later School of English Cathedral Music
we possess. The variety of treatment displayed
in these charming Compositions is inexhaustible.
Whatever may be the sentiment of the words,
the Music is always coloured in accordance with
it ; and always worthy of its subject. It has
been said that he errs, sometimes, in attempting
too literal an interpretation of his text, as in
the Anthem, 'They that go down to the sea
in ships,' which begins with a Solo for the Bass
Voice, starting upon the D above the Stave, and
descending, by degrees, two whole Octaves, to
the D below it. No doubt, this passage is open
to a certain amount of censure — or would be so,
if it were less artistically put together. Direct
imitation of Nature, in Music, like Onomatopoiea
in Poetry, is incompatible with the highest as
pirations of Art. Still, there is scarcely one of
our greatest Composers who has not, at some
time or other, been tempted to indulge in it —
witness Handel's Plague of Flies, Haydn's imi
tation of the crowing of the 2Cock, Beethoven's
Cuckoo, Quail, and Nightingale, and Mendels
sohn's Donkey. We all condemn these passages,
in theory, and not without good reason : yet
we always listen to them with pleasure. Why ?
Because, apart from their materialistic aspect,
which cannot be defended, they are good and
beautiful Music. A listener unacquainted with
the song of the Cuckoo, or the bray of the
Donkey, would accept them, as conceived in the
most perfect taste imaginable. And we have
only to ignore the too persistent realism in
Purcell 's passage also, in order to listen to it
with equal satisfaction ; for, it is not only grandly
conceived, but admirably fitted, by its breadth
of design, and dignity of expression, to serve as
the opening of an Anthem which teems with
noble thoughts, from beginning to end.3
This peculiar feature in Purcell's style natur
ally leads us to the consideration of another, and
a very brilliant attribute of his genius — its in
tense dramatic power. His Operas were no less
in advance of the age than his Anthems, his
Odes, or his Cantatas, his keen perception of the
proprieties of the Stage no less intuitive than
Mozart's. The history of his first Opera, ' Dido
and jEneas,' written, in 1675, for the pupils at
a private boarding-school in Leicester Fields, is
very suggestive. Though he produced this fine
work at the early age of 1 7, it not only shows no
sign of youthful indecision, but bears testimony,
in a very remarkable manner, to the boldness of
his genius. Scorning all compromise, he was not
content to produce a Play, with incidental Songs,
2 Quoted under OBOE, vol. H. p. 488 a.
8 The passage was written for the quite exceptional Voice of the
Kev. John Gostllng, Sub-Dean of S. Paul's. Few Bass singers can do
it justice; but many of our readers must remember Its admirable
interpretation by the late Mr. Adam Leffler.
286 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
after the fashion of the times ; but set the whole
of the Dialogue in Recitative. Now, among the
numerous qualifications indispensable to a really
great dramatic Composer, the most important, by
far, is that innate perception of rhetorical truth
without which good declamation is impossible.
Perfect elocution is as necessary to the develop
ment of scenic power as perfect acting: and
Recitative, which, instead of assisting the effec
tive delivery of the text, serves only as an
hindrance to it, must be radically bad. Lulli,
following the example of the Italian Monodic
Composers, bore this carefully in mind, and
hence, in great measure, his Operas were so ex
traordinarily successful. Pelham Humfrey had
seen enough of Lulli, in Paris, to understand
this position, perfectly; and, no doubt, he im
parted much of his experience to his promising
pupil : but Purcell, from the very first, took
higher ground than either Humfrey, or even
Lulli himself. It is not too much to say that
the declamatory consistency of his Recitative
has never been surpassed. It is so true to
Nature, and shows so intimate an acquaintance
with the genius of the English language, that
no good Singer, resigning himself to its lead,
can possibly misconceive his part. Its command
of delineation is unlimited. Passing, constantly,
from the unaccompanied to the accompanied
form, and, from this, to the more highly-wrought
phrases of Recitative a tempo, or Aria parlante,
it becomes, alternately, a vehicle for the ex
pression of profound pathos, or passionate ex
citement. Moreover, its adaptability to the
individual character of the Scene, even in situa
tions of the most powerful dramatic interest, is
very remarkable. In many of PurcelTs Operas,
we meet with very near approaches to the
Romantic. And the Music is always equal to
the emergency. One of the highest flights he
ever attempted, in this particular direction, is
to be found in the Frost Scene in 'King Arthur' ;
in which the shivering Voice of the Genius of
Cold is brought into contrast with the bright
Song of Cupid, by means as legitimate as those
used, in the 'Zauberflote,' for the purpose of
contrasting the ' Hm, hm, hm, hm, ' of Papageno
with the Voices of the Three Boys. This, how
ever, is only one case, out of many. Wherever
the necessity for a master-stroke presents itself,
Purcell is invariably found ready to meet it.
In summing up our estimate of the genius of
this most gifted writer, we cannot but be struck
by its wonderful versatility. His Overtures and
Act-Tunes are as interesting as his Choruses.
His Instrumental Chamber Music, if inferior to
that of Corelli, ranks far above that of any other
writer of the period ; and, in the difficult art of
writing upon a Ground Bass, he was never even
approached, before the time of Handel — the only
Composer who has ever yet succeeded in in
vesting that particular form of construction with
a perfectly unfettered aspect. That he was
largely indebted to Lulli, in the first instance,
there can be no doubt ; and he himself made
no seci^t of his admiration for the works of the
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Italian Monodic Composers : but, he passed them
all, as Handel passed Ariosti, and Haydn, Por-
pora. The only one of his contemporaries who
can fairly claim to be placed by his side is
Alessandro Scarlatti ; between whose work and
his own a strong analogy may be traced. But,
Scarlatti lived 66 years, and Purcell only 37.
How he contrived to accomplish so vast an
amount of work in so short a life-time is a secret
which we shall best understand by comparing
his career with that of Schubert, to whom he is
very closely allied, by his indefatigable industry,
the exhaustless range of his productive power,
the spontaneity of his conception, and the inten
sity of his devotion to an Art which, from first
to last, formed the mainspring of his existence.
We have dwelt so long upon the work of our
greatest native Musician, that we have but little
space left for the consideration of that accom
plished by his successors, though some of these
have left us Compositions which we could ill
afford to lose. We have already spoken of two
sets of Choristers, educated in the Chapel Eoyal.
That famous nursery of Art produced yet a third
set, educated, for the most part, under Dr. Blow.1
Among these were, Jeremiah Clarke, and William
Croft, Mus.Doc. ; the former, celebrated for the
exquisite tenderness of his style, which finds its
most touching expression in the well-known
Anthem, for Treble, Solo, and Chorus, 'How
long wilt thou forget me ' — an embodiment of
pathos only too applicable to the sad history of
the Composer's life ; the latter, one of the most
conscientious, as well as the most prolific of our
Cathedral writers, whose Anthems and Services,
all characterised by masterly workmanship, true
musicianlike feeling, and even — as in ' Cry aloud
and shout ' — by something approaching sub
limity, are little less popular at the present day
than they were a hundred years ago. To the
names of these Composers must be added those
of some excellent Musicians, who, though edu
cated in other Choirs, almost all become Gentle
men of the Chapel Royal in later life ; notably,
those of Drs. Greene, Boyce, and Nares, John
Goldwin, John Weldon, and the clerical ama
teurs, Drs. Holder, Creyghton, and Aldrich, who
all did good service to their Church, and their
Art, and are gratefully remembered in every
Choir in England. Had Purcell's life been
spared, these men would have supplemented his
work with no ignoble contributions to the archives
of the School. Greene, and Nares, though a
little too much inclined to ssecularity of manner,
were thorough masters of Melody; the few Coin-
positions we possess, by Creyghton, are marked
by an originality which could not but have led
to excellent results, had his pen been more pro
ductive ; while Weldon, Boyce, and Aldrich,
needed only a greater breadth of style to raise
their works to a more than satisfactory level.
But their leader was taken from their head.
I After the death of Captain Cook, In I6T2, Pelham Humfrey held
the Office of Master of the Children, until his early death in 1674.
Humfrey was succeeded, in turn, by Dr. Blow, Dr. Croft, J. Church,
Bernard Gates, Dr. Nares, and Dr. Ayrton.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 287
Purcell left no one behind him capable of raising
the School to a higher level than it had already
attained, or even of worthily supporting it at
the point indicated by his own magnificent be
ginning. A period of decadence was, therefore,
inevitable ; and no more successes were recorded,
after his early death, in 1694, until an unex
pected importation of foreign talent so changed
the aspect of affairs that the brightest triumphs
of the past were forgotten in the anticipation of
a still more splendid future.
XXV. Though THE ITALIAN SCHOOLS OF THE
i8iH CENTUBY are most noticeable for the in
fluence they exercised upon the Opera Buffa, in
the earlier stages of its development, they also
witnessed a steady advance, in Serious Music
of all kinds. In the Sacred Music of Leo
and Feo, and still more in that of Marcello and
Durante, we find the sober gravity of Carissimi
and Alessandro Scarlatti clothed with a grace
unknown to any of the Composers of the preced
ing century ; a happy union of the best qualities
of the Monodic style with the stronger features
of a modified system of Counterpoint, not alto
gether unlike that which was already preparing
so great a future for Germany. Leo and Feo —
both pupils of Pitoni, one of the last survivors of
the Polyphonic sera — inclined most lovingly to
the massive combinations which alone can invest
a full Chorus with becoming dignity ; support
ing their Voice Parts by an Instrumental Ac
companiment, equally remarkable for the breadth
of its conception, and the purity of its effect.
Marcello, caring less for the sublime than the
beautiful, engrafted upon the softer graces of the
Venetian manner a polished ease entirely his
own ; and, never losing sight of the calm sobriety
of treatment without which good Sacred Music
cannot exist, invented a style too refined, like
that of Durante, to become ' old-fashioned,' even
in our own day.1 Nearly all these Composers, ex
cept Durante, wrote for the Theatre, as well as for
the Church ; as did also their fellow-countrymen,
Porpora, Domenico Scarlatti, Vinci, Jomelli,
and many others of less celebrity ; and their
united efforts gradually formed a style which
found its way into many distant parts of Europe.
Increased attention had long been given to the
cultivation of the Voice ; and Airs, demanding
powers of execution before unnecessary, were
now expected, as a matter of course, not only in
the Opera, but in the Oratorio. New Divisions
were daily invented, for the purpose of exhibiting
the dexterity of Singers, who vied with each other
in their determination to overcome difficulties
before unheard of. Arie di bravura 2 were gradu
ally substituted for the more simple and declama
tory Melodies of an earlier period. These Airs,
however, were always well constructed, enriched
by judiciously arranged Accompaniments, and
often full of genuine dramatic fire, as may be
seen in the following passage from a once famous
but long forgotten example by Vinci.
i One of his melodies, from the 22nd Psalm, sounds perfectly in
Its place when used notatim by Bossini in his Overture to the ' Siege
of Corinth.' 2 gee vol. ii. p. 510.
Allegro Andante.
^
J j r p
* - » - • I -K-
st
-• — 0 •-
Vo «ol - - cando il mar cru -de - le, Sen - za
-»— g— S~S~rg~l!~l
-S=3=:t=5r ifctq
-
I — I - •
In an age which boasted sufficient facility of
invention to produce such passages as these, and
Singers capable of doing them justice, the step
from Opera Seria to Opera Buffa was but a
short one. It needed only the exuberant spirits
of some bright Neapolitan Composer to strike
out a new idea worth cultivating, and such a
Composer was found in Logroscino. We have
already mentioned the radical change effected in
the constitution of the Lyric Drama by this
talented writer's invention of the Concerted
Finale.3 To that, and to the transcendant genius
of Pergolesi, and his successors, Galuppi, Sacchini,
Piccinni, Paisiello, and Cimarosa, the Neapolitan
and other Italian Schools owe the extraordinary
excellence of their Opera Buffa. Equally guiltless
of the triviality by which its foreign imitations
have been degraded on the one hand, and the
heaviness which has oppressed them on the other,
the lighter forms of Italian Opera have never
lost either the sprightly gaiety or the inde
scribable refinement imparted to them by the
Masters who first showed the possibility of pre
senting Comedy, as well as Tragedy, in a Lyric
dress : and hence it is that the true Opera
Buffa, notwithstanding its extreme, and some
times extravagant lightness, still claims an ar
tistic status which cannot fairly be accorded to
the Comic Operas produced in any country north
of the Alps.
XXVI. In turning from the Italian to THE
GEKMAN SCHOOLS OF THE i8TH CENTUKT, one
cannot but be struck by the strange contrasts
presented in the history of Sacred Music in the
two countries. With Leonardo Leo, the grand
Italian style died out. Neither Durante, Per
golesi, nor Jomelli, made any attempt to culti
vate it ; and the travesties of Guglielmi corre
spond too closely with the history of his life to
conduce to the dignity of Sacred Art. The best
period of the grand German style, on the con
trary, was, at this epoch, only just beginning to
dawn. It originated, as we have seen, in the
days of Michael Prsetorius, with a growing taste
for Vocal Music with Instrumental Accompani
ment. The elder Bachs, and their contemporaries,
took care that this did not degenerate into the
3 See vol. il. p. 514. One of the earliest known instances of the
introduction of the Concerted Finale into Opera Seria occurs in
Paisiello's'Plrro.'
288 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
weakness inseparable from unrelieved Monodia.
Bearing in mind the lessons imported from
Venice by Hasler, they fully appreciated the
grandeur of effect producible by the simulta
neous motion of a multiplicity of independent
Parts ; and having learned by experience the
secret of accommodating that motion to the vary
ing character of the Instruments they employed,
and of justly balancing against each other their
masses of Vocal and Instrumental Harmony,
they succeeded, within a very short space of
time, in laying the foundations of a School the
essential features of which have lasted to the
present day.
Passing from the works of this transitional
period to those produced but a very few years
later, we find the more prominent features of the
style exhibited, in fullest perfection, in the Com
positions of two writers who are sometimes erro
neously supposed to have invented it. Sebastian
Bach, and Henrich Graun, having passed their
infancy among the earlier Masters of this new
Polyodic School,1 had learned its secrets so
thoroughly, that, on thei rarrival at an age which
enabled them to think for themselves, they found
no difficulty in turning them to such account as
had never before been contemplated. Among
these secrets were two, of greater importance
than the rest, which seem simple enough, to us,
though their development into fixed principles
was a slow one.
(1) That Voices, supported by Instrumental
Accompaniment, can sing many Intervals which
cannot be safely entrusted to them without the
aid of, at least, a Thorough-Bass.
(2) That there are, nevertheless, certain Inter
vals, which do not produce a good effect, without
some kind of Instrumental Accompaniment, even
though sung by Voices capable of taking them in
tune, without adventitious aid.
No doubt, these two truisms — as we should
now call them — had been impressed upon Seb.
Bach's mind, from the days of his youth. At
any rate, he made such good use of them, that
the Diminished Fourth became as practicable
and as plastic in his hands, as the Minor Sixth
in those of Palestrina. His successors have ad
mitted their validity, also ; but not in an equal
degree. No objection has ever been raised against
the first law : but, neglect of the second has led
to the manifest inferiority of the German Part-
Song to the English Glee.
Seb. Bach wrote comparatively little Ssecular
Music, of any kind, and none for the Theatre.
Graun wrote many Operas, both German and
1 The terms 'Polyodic' and 'Polyphonic,' though etymologically
almost interchangeable, are not so in their technical sense. At the
beginning of the present century, all Music, whether Vocal or Instru
mental, in which the interest was not confined to a single Part, was
called 'Polyodic.' The word 'Polyphonic' is of much more recent
origin ; and is applied exclusively to Vocal Music, without Accom
paniment, written in Strict Counterpoint, In which the Melody is
equally distributed between all the Parts. No less important is the
technical distinction between the terms 'Monodic' and 'Homo-
phonic'; the former being correctly applicable only to Vocal, or
Instrumental Music, in which the Melody is confined to a single Part j
and the latter, to Vocal Music, without Accompaniment, written in
Strict Counterpoint of the First Order— Note against Note. A care
ful use of the terms Homophonia, Polyphonia, Monodia, and Poly-
odia. Is a great desideratum in musical criticism.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Italian. Most of these were successful: but, long
before his time, the German Opera had already
been established, on a firm basis, at Hamburg,
by Reinhard Keiser, an account of whose work
will be found at pp. 507-8 of our second volume,
with some mention of that effected by Matthe-
son, and other writers who flourished at the
beginning of the century. After their disap
pearance, the farther development of Serious
Opera in Germany depended almost entirely on
the exertions of the indefatigable Graun; for
Hasse, though he was born in North Germany,
and attained his high reputation in Dresden, was
as much a disciple of the Neapolitan School as
Durante, or Porpora ; while Gluck, though
equally devoted to the Italian School in early
life, achieved his greatest triumph in that of
France. Meanwhile, a distinct School of Comic
Opera was established, at Leipzig, by Adam
Hiller; the originator of that peculiar form of
' Singspiel,' with spoken Dialogue, which repre
sents the German idea of the Musical Drama as
distinctly as the 'Dramma per la musica' does
the Italian. [Vol. ii. p. 519.]
And no less rich was the Germany of the iSth
century in her Instrumental than in her Vocal
Schools. The long line of Bachs handed down
their victories over the difficulties of the Organ,
from father to son, until Johann Sebastian played
as no man had ever played before him, brought
the Instrumental Fugue to a degree of perfection
which has never since been equalled, and dowered,
not only the Organ and Harpsichord, but many
a Stringed and Wind Instrument also, to say
nothing of the full Orchestra, with a whole library
of Compositions, the worth of which has not even
yet been fully appreciated. No man then living
was able to compete on equal terms with the
author of these stupendous works ; yet there
was no dearth of gifted writers, whose readiness
to build upon the foundation provided for them
by his marvellous industry led to very important
results. Johann Christian Bach carried on his
father's work, in London, with earnestness, and
success. Carl Philipp Emanuel followed it up,
still more effectively, in Berlin, and Hamburg;
and, by his refined style of playing, no less than
by his delightful Compositions, raised the repu
tation of his favourite Instrument, the Harpsi
chord, to very nearly the highest point it was
destined to attain, before the career of the fine
old ' Clavicembalo' was abruptly terminated by
the irresistible attractions of the newly-invented
Piano-Forte. And thus arose a style of Music,
so well adapted to the capabilities of the Key
board, that we, with the Piano-forte within our
reach, are thankful to return to it, and, wearied
with the frivolities of a too facile execution, to
refresh our ears with passages designed rather to
please than to astonish.
XXVII. But, during the second half of the
century, the remembrance of all these Masters
was completely swept away by the rising fame of
Haydn and Mozart — two giants, who placed be
tween THE SCHOOL OF VIENNA and that of the
Bachs a fathomless abyss which no amount of
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
critical ingenuity will ever satisfactorily bridge
over.
Of Haydn we shall speak more particularly,
when treating of the structural change by which
he revolutionised Instrumental Music ; though his
Dramatic Works, written for Prince Esterhazy's
Theatre, deserve more attention than has yet been
devoted to them. To Mozart, the German Lyric
Drama owes, not only its most precious posses
sions, but its splendid position at the head of the
Schools of Europe. His genius, breaking down all
distinctions of manner, whether popular or scho
lastic, acknowledged no law but that of Nature. By
pure instinct he learned so to blend the brightness
of Italian Melody with the sterner combinations
suggested by German Thought, that it is impos
sible either to affiliate him to any recognised family
of Composers, or to decide upon the nationality of
his style. To say, as critics have said, that he was
more Italian than German, is absurd : yet the
converse would be no nearer the truth. As a
dramatic writer he stands alone. He was not
the mere creator of a School : he was the School
itself — the source of its inspiration, its moving
principle, its inmost soul. He did not even invent
it, in the ordinary sense of the word. It came to
him as a part of his nature — a wealth of genius,
which, added to that bequeathed by Haydn and
Beethoven, made the School of Vienna the richest
in the world. If ever there was a case in which
the glorious freedom of natural talent carried all
before it, it was his. The dry formality, too often,
engendered by the cultivation of learning at the
expense of feeling and expression, vanished, in his
presence, like mist before a sunbeam. Learned
he was, indeed, beyond the wisest of his contem
poraries : yet he wrote, not from the head, but
from the heart ; and almost always produced his
happiest effects by means before untried. Whether
we study him in his instrumental or vocal phrases,
in his Symphonies or his Masses, his Quartets or
his Operas, we always find him pressing resolutely
forward, on untrodden paths, in pursuit of some
new ideal beauty which he alone had power to
conceive. One good thing only did he condescend
to borrow. For the outward form of his Instru
mental Movements he was indebted to the in
genuity of another mind, as fertile as his own :
a mind which exercised so vast an influence over
the whole realm of Art, that it is impossible to
exaggerate the importance, either of the principles
it enuntiated, or the mission it accomplished.
And here it is that Haydn asserts his claim to
notice, as one of the greatest musical reformers
of any age.
Sebastian Bach died in 1750, when the Com
poser of 'The Creation' was just eighteen
years and five months old — a chronological cer
tainty to which, if it rested on internal evi
dence, we should refuse credence. With the
' Suites Fran9aises ' of the one Master, and the
' Twelve Grand Symphonies ' of the other, before
us, we might well expect to find two such works
separated by at least a century of thought and
progress. Yet Bach was still alive, while Haydn,
in his garret in the Kohlmarkt, was patiently
VOL. III. PT. 3.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 289
working out, by his own unaided genius, that
justly famous 'Sonata-form/ which holds, inMusic,
a place analogous to that of the Vertebrate Skele
ton in the Animal Kingdom, serving, in one or
other of its countless modifications, as the basis
of every great Instrumental Composition that
has been given to the world since it was first
evolved from the' AUemande/ the ' Courante,' and
the 'Allegro' of the old 'Suite de Pieces.' We
need not stay to analyse this ingenious device,
which is fully described elsewhere.1 Our present
purpose extends no farther than the indication
of its just position in the technical History of
Music. No gift so precious has since been
offered at the Shrine of Art. Its value has been
acknowledged by the practice of every great Com
poser, from Mozart's day to our own : and it is
noticeable that every Composer is seen at his
greatest, when he most freely acknowledges his
obligation to the ' Father of the Symphony.' This
argues no want of originality among later Masters.
For ' Papa Haydn's ' invention is founded upon
a great principle : and, until some still greater
one shall be discovered, the Composer who ignores
it runs the risk of producing an ill-planned Move
ment, the defects of which can no more be con
doned by the perfection of its details, than the
monstrosities of an ill- formed skeleton can be con
cealed by the softness of the fur which covers it.
The 1 8th century may therefore be said to govern
the Instrumental Schools of the present day, by
means of this invaluable contrivance, not only in
Germany, but throughout Europe.
XXVIII. The history of THE FRENCH SCHOOL
OF THE i8TH CENTURY divides itself into two dis
tinct periods, quite unconnected with each other.
Too jealous to endure the thought of a rival,
the Italian, Lulli, worked for himself alone, and
left neither disciple nor worthy successor. It is
true that his fame long outlived him ; but, mean
while, Art was at a stand-still : and it was not
until .many years after his death that France
herself produced a genius capable of advancing
his work. The right man was found at last in
Rameau, who was recognised as one of the most
learned Theorists in Europe, long before he at
tempted to lay the foundation of a new School of
Dramatic Composition, and was, therefore, the
better fitted to carry out his task with dignity.
Yet, notwithstanding his reputation, he found it
difficult to obtain a hearing : and it was not until
the production of his ' Hippolyte et Aricie,' in
1733, that his talent received its due reward.
Then, indeed, his name became deservedly popu
lar ; and, in his ' Castor et Pollux,' ' Dardanus,'
and many later Operas, he introduced improve
ments in form, expression, management of the
Orchestra, and general dramatic effect, which
Lulli had never anticipated, and which soon
raised the French Opera to a level it had never
before seemed likely to attain. The sudden
ness of his success was probably in a great
measure due to the strongly-marked character
of his well-arranged ideas. The 'Eigaudon'2
i See vol. i. p. 547 el seq. ; also SONATA.
s Recently reprinted by Messrs. Cocks & Co.
u
290 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
in 'Dardanus' is as full of genuine fire as a
Bourree from the Suites of Seb. Bach. One
can readily understand how such Movements a
this must have taken the Parisians, accustomed
to the dead-level of Lulli's poorest imitators, by
storm. The misfortune was, that Kameau, like
Lulli, found no one to succeed him ; and it was
not until ten years after his death that French
Opera owed another regeneration to another
foreigner.
The arrival of Gluck in Paris, in 1774, marks
one of the most important epochs in the History
of Music, and one of the most curious anomalies
in that of national Schools. Born a German,
with all a German's love for solid Harmony,
Gluck studied in Italy, wrote Italian Operas,
conceived the first idea of his great reform in
England, tried in vain to introduce it in his own
country, and finally, with the aid of a French
Librettist, achieved his greatest triumph in French
Opera, at Paris. The history of that triumph is
too well known to need repetition.1 But it is
impossible to lay too much stress upon the fact,
that, from circumstance, and not from choice, it
was French Opera that Gluck reformed. Germany
would have nothing to say to his improvements.
France received them. And, notwithstanding
the opposition of the Piccinists, it was the
French School that reaped the first benefit of a
movement which will probably leave its mark
upon Art as long as the Opera shall last. What
is this mark ? It is necessary that we should be
able to recognise, not only its outward form, but
the spirit of which that form is the symbol : for,
if rightly understood, it will furnish us with a
key to more than one very difficult problem
connected with our present position ; whereas, if
misinterpreted, it cannot fail to lead us into
fatal error.
From the moment in which he first entertained
the idea of remodelling the Lyric Drama, until
that of his greatest triumph, Gluck had but one
end in view — the presentment of pure dramatic
truth. To secure this, he was willing to sacrifice
symmetry of Form, continuity of Melody, re
gularity of Khythm, flexibility of Voice, or any
other means of effect which he felt to be un-
suited to the situation with which he had to
deal. But, under no circumstances whatever
was he prepared to sacrifice euphony. Neither in
his practice, nor in the detailed exposition of his
theory which he has given to the world, does he
ever hint at the possibility of this. Yet it has
become a common thing to cite his authority in
justification of enormities which would have made
his hair stand on end. The best answer to this
misconstruction will be found in the Operas he
wrote after he had cast aside the trammels of
conventional treatment, and learned to think for
himself. In these great works, planned in full
accordance with the principles laid down in his
preface to 'Alceste/ he does indeed, over and
over again, refrain from introducing a telling
Melody into a Score unsuited to its character;
See vol. i. pp. 601-603; 11. pp. 514-517.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
but he takes care that the Music which sup
plies its place shall always be good and beau
tiful ; and it is precisely because this condition
is too often neglected, by some who profess them
selves his most devoted admirers, that we feel
bound to lay more than ordinary stress upon it
here. In discussing the peculiarities of later
Schools, we shall probably refer to the subject
once more. Meanwhile, let it be clearly under
stood, that, whatever may be the opinion of more
modern authorities, Gluck, at least, never be
lieved ideal beauty to be incompatible with
dramatic truth.
XXIX. THE ENGLISH SCHOOL OF THE ISTH
CENTURY also owes its chief glories to a foreigner,
who, naturalised in this country, found his at
tempts to meet and lead the taste of an English
audience rewarded by inspirations grander than
any with which he had been previously visited.
Handel made his first public appearance in
London on Feb. 24, 1711, fifteen years and
three months after the sad day on which the
brightest prospects of the School of the Ee-
storation had been clouded by the death of
Henry Purcell. During this period of respect*
able stagnation, no native Musician had ventured,
either to strike out a new path, or to take up
the work, on the old lines, where Purcell had
left it. Yet it is certain that, notwithstanding
this, the national taste had not deteriorated.
Purcell had so far raised its standard, that, when.
Handel demanded a hearing, he found an intelli
gent and thoroughly appreciative audience only
too glad to do him justice. He achieved his
earliest successes at the Queen's Theatre, in the
Haymarket. But we need not speak of these.
Had we not already described his Operas2 we
should scarcely feel justified in classing them
among the productions of an English School:
for, though composed in England, for an Eng*
lish audience, performed at an English theatre,
and printed exclusively (until within the last
few years) by English music-sellers, they were
written in the Italian language, to be sung by
Italian Vocalists. But, side by side with these
Italian pieces grew up a collection of English
works, in a style which has never yet been
fully appreciated, save in the land of its birth.
A style more impressive than any that had
been conceived, since the decadence of Poly
phony ; more colossal in its proportions than the
grandest combinations of Leo, or Colonna, or
the most elaborate productions of the German
Polyodic period; and more true to Nature, in
its endless varieties of expression, than any
form of Dramatic Music previously cultivated.
We first find this new phase of thought dis
tinctly asserted in the 'Utrecht Te Deum
and Jubilate,' composed in 1713 — though traces
of it are not wanting in the 'Birthday Ode,'
produced a few months earlier. In the twelve
Chandos Anthems,' written in 1718-20, for
the Chapel at Cannons, it is present throughout ;
and, in 'Esther,' and 'Acis and Galatea,' com-
2 See vol. 11. p. 507.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
posed for the Duke of Chandos in 1720 and
1 7 2 1 , we should feel inclined to say that it had
reached its full perfection, but for the still
greater degree of sublimity attained in 'Deborah,'
in 1733. After this, Handel's genius never
flagged. Though his works succeeded each other
with astonishing rapidity, no weakness or haste
was perceptible in any of them : and, in all
his Oratorios, Odes, Anthems, and other choral
works, with English words, this massive style
was used as the basis of everything. It dif
fered from the method of Seb. Bach, in many
essential particulars ; and may easily be distin
guished from that of synchronous Masters by its
stupendous breadth, and its scrupulous avoid
ance of harsh collisions. Its grandest effects
are almost always produced when the means
used seem the most simple: for Handel never
wrote a multitude of notes when a few would
answer his purpose. And hence it is that his
Music bears, towards the greatest monuments of
German Art, a relation not unlike that which
Lord Prudhoe's Lions bear to those in Trafalgar
Square — a single touch, in the one, producing
the effect which, in the other, cost fifty. Yet the
touches were never rough. No less conspicuous
than their strength was their unbroken Wohl-
Tclang — their never-failing pleasantness of sound.
Even throughout the part of Polyphemus — and,
surely, we may look upon that as an extreme
case — the actual progressions are as smooth as
Art can make them; and produce their effect,
without the aid of that strange power of draw
ing Harmony out of Discord which forms so
prominent a feature in the method of Seb. Bach.
It is to the joint effect of this perfect Harmony
and gigantic scale, that the style owes the recog
nition it has so long commanded. It is certain
that our great-great-grandfathers liked it; and
it says much for the audiences of the 1 8th century,
that they were able to take pleasure in the un
adorned sublimity of many a grand conception,
which can only be made endurable to the general
public in the iQth, by the aid of a Regimental
Band.1 No School can possibly be formed, where
there are no willing listeners : and, in this case, the
genius of the Founder met its complement in the
appreciative power of the audiences that gathered
around him, at the King's Theatre, and Vauxhall,
and the Chapel of the Foundling Hospital. But,
as with Lulli in France, so it was with Handel
in England. The School died out with the Master.
Arne was in earnest, and did his best : yet, how
could a man of ordinary stature carry on the
work of a giant ? Arnold and the Hayes family
were pigmies, even compared with Arne. There
was no one else to take the lead in Sacred
Music : but the Opera was not altogether neg
lected. In the hands of Storace, Dibdin, Hook,
1 When, during the latter half of the century, some few of Handel's
works were produced at Vienna, it was with Mozart's 'Additional
Accompaniments.' Still, it must not be forgotten that these Ac
companiments were written under the pressure of a real necessity.
There was no Organ in the Orchestra ; and it was absolutely indis
pensable that the Harmonies should be supported by some Instru
ment possessing both greater volume of tone, and greater sustaining
power, than the Pianoforte.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 291
and Shield — four talented Composers, whose fresh
and graceful Melodies earned for them a vast
popularity — it assumed a form quite different
from that practised in any Continental School,
yet by no means destitute of merits. Encumbered
with a superfluity of spoken Dialogue, in which
nearly the whole of the action was carried on, it
contented itself with an artistic status far below
that of the German ' Singspiel,' or the French
' Ope'ra Comique ' : but it yielded to neither in
the spontaneity of its conception ; and, if it fell
beneath them in breadth of design, it was their
equal in freshness of idea and geniality of treat
ment. Its Melodies were essentially English : so
much so, that we still cherish many of them, as
the happiest and most expressive Ballads we
possess. But its one great fault was the almost
total absence of dramatic power. Where this is
wanting, the Lyric Drama can never achieve real
greatness : and, that it was wanting here, must
be evident to all who study the period. But
for this, it is probable that the School we are
describing might have led to something very much
better. As it is, it has passed away for ever.
We have dwelt thus long upon the history of
the 1 8th century, because it was as much th«
' Golden Age ' of Modern Music as the 1 6th was
of Polyphony. It witnessed the early efforts of
all the greatest of the Great Masters — the bluest
blood of Art — with one exception only ; and the
culminating point in the career of all but two.
Its records are those of the brightest triumphs of
the later development. No new principles have
been discovered since its close ; no new types de
vised ; and no new form of expression, save that of
' Romanticism,' conceived. The work of the igth
century has been the fuller illustration of truths
set forth in the i8th. That work is still in pro
gress ; and we have now to consider its influence
upon a few of the leading Schools of Europe.
XXX. One great name connects itself so closely
with THE GEKMAN SCHOOLS OF THE IQTHCENTUKT,
and exercises so lordly a dominion over them,
that, like the Jupiter of the system, it makes
us forget the size of inferior Planets, by the
immensity of its own huge mass. Let us try to
put away from us all thought of hero-worship,
and, with all possible fairness to later authors,
consider, not Beethoven's own merits, but his
influence upon the School he founded. We shall
be able to do this the more satisfactorily, if we
go back one generation, and enquire what in
fluence the preceding School had upon him.
Beginners, who find some difficulty in correct
ing Consecutive Fifths, and still more in detect
ing their presence, are never weary of parading
Beethoven's ' contempt for rules,' in justification
of their own ignorance of the first principles of
Art. Yet we possess, even now, no less than
245 of his exercises, written, under Haydn's
guidance,2 on Fux's 'Gradus ad Parnassum,'
besides 263, written on Albrechtsberger's ' An-
weisung zur Composition,' under the super-
2 Many of these Exercises are written In the old Ecclesiastical
Modes, upon the study of which it is clear that Haydn insisted, no
less strongly than Fux.
U2
292 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
intendence of its author. It is plain, therefore,
that he took care to study the rules, before he
broke them : and, that his Counterpoint, at any
rate, was not uninfluenced by his predecessors
In like manner, he is constantly glorified for his
'freedom from set forms.' Yet no one ever more
thoroughly understood, or more deeply valued, the
orthodox Sonata-form, than he. Here, again, he
was neither ashamed to learn from his predeces
sors, nor to acknowledge the obligation. How,
then, can a writer, who hands down no new prin
ciple, be said to have founded a new School ? Our
answer to this question involves no anomaly :
for, the School of which we are now speaking
differed from those which preceded it in its
aesthetic character only. Beethoven was, em
phatically, a Child of Genius — not a Votary of
Science. His fathomless Imagination — the most
prominent feature of his style — was the free gift
of Nature. His power of conception cost him
nothing. But, for the Art which enabled him to
set forth his ideas with such perfect logical ac
curacy that no intelligent mind can fail to under
stand them, he found it necessary to work — and
that with the most indefatigable industry. And,
in acquiring that Art, he discovered what no
one else had before suspected — that the Sonata-
form was not only the most symmetrical, but
also the most elastic in existence. These con
siderations enable us to sum up the results of
our enquiry in a very few words. In his
mechanism, Beethoven was influenced by the
Schools of the i8th century. In his imaginative
power, he stood alone. In the elasticity he im
parted to the Forms of his predecessors, he laid
the foundation of a Style before unknown. And
the influence of that Style not only separated the
later School of Vienna from every system that had
preceded it, but extended rapidly to every other
centre of production in Europe, and before many
years had passed, exercised an authority which
may fairly be described as universal.
XXXI. THE ROMANTIC SCHOOL followed the
profoundly Imaginative Style of which we have
been speaking, so closely, that it may almost
be said to form part of it. We have, indeed,
mentioned Weber as the undoubted Founder
of Romantic Opera. But, Romanticism exhibits
itself in Instrumental, as well as in Dramatic
Music : and, without the elasticity of Form
suggested by Beethoven, its manifestation, in the
Sonata, the Symphony, or even the Overture,
would have been impossible.1
Let us clearly understand the distinction be
tween Romantic Music, properly so called, and
Music that is purely Imaginative. In poetical
expression, in depth of feeling, in direct appeal
to the varied emotions which excite the human
soul to highest exaltation or profoundest de
pression, the two styles possess so many at
tributes in common, that the superficial observer
is in constant danger of mistaking the one for
the other: but no careful critic can be thus
easily misled, for, even when both styles are
1 See rol. ii. pp. 620-522; vol. iii. pp. 148-152.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
present — as they very frequently are — in the
same work, they are separated by a line of de
marcation as clearly recognisable as that which
distinguishes the Major from the Minor Mode.
The actual thought may be as wild, as visionary,
as mysterious, as far removed from the surround
ings of ordinary life, in the one case, as in the
other. The Imaginative Composer's idea is fre
quently even more ' romantic ' — using the word
in its every-day sense — than that of his brother
Artist. But, it is not treated in the same way.
The Romantic Composer paints his picture with
the richest colours his orchestral palette can
command ; horrifies us with the depth of his
sombre shadows ; enthrals our senses with his
most delicious fancies ; excites us to delirium
with a crash of Trumpets ; or drives us to despair
with the roll of a muffled Drum. If he be a true
Master, he depicts the Scene before him with
such exceeding clearness that it becomes a visible
reality to the dullest of his hearers ; a living
truth presented to the eye, through the medium
of the ear. But, he neither expects nor desires
that his audience shall see the picture in any
other light than that in which he presents it :
and, in point of fact, his influence over others
will generally be found to bear a direct relation
to the clearness of his power of definition. The
Imaginative Composer, on the other hand, de
fines nothing. The Scene he would depict has
no real existence. Its details, drawn entirely
from the region of his own individual Fancy, can
be comprehended only by those who are able to
follow him into that region. Unable to commu
nicate the thought which underlies them, iii
words, he expresses it in Music ; enduing sound
with all the passionate yearnings denied to
human language ; conveying his hearers into a
world filled with utterances of a meaning too
subtle to be clothed in speech ; and thus for ever
dwelling in depths of Poetry accessible only to
those who can think, and feel, while the vulgar
are content to stare. There is nothing anta
gonistic between these two great phases of modern
musical thought. They both have the same high
aim; and they both deal with the same lofty
subjects. But, the treatment of the one is ob
jective ; and that of the other, subjective. The
one busies itself with the Seen ; the other, with
the Unseen. Yet, strange to say, the greatest
Masters have been Masters of both. We need
only cite two Symphonies of Beethoven, in illus
tration of our meaning. The man who, listening
to the ' Sinfonia Pastorale,' cannot see the beau
tiful landscape, sit down beside the brook, dance
with the peasants, get drenched through and
through with the storm, and give thanks to God
when the rainbow first gleams in the sky, must
be dead alike to every sense of Poetry and of
Art. How different is the Symphony in A!
We cannot tell — no human tongue can tell, in
words — the meaning of the wonderful Allegretto.
No language can express the depth of thought
enshrined in that awful episode in the delicious
Scherzo, universally recognised as the highest
manifestation of the Sublime as yet afforded by
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
the Art-life of the iQth century. But, we can
understand it. It speaks to us in accents far
stronger than words. And, in listening to it, we
are brought into closer communion with the
Composer's inmost soul than we could have
gained through any amount of personal inter
course with him during his life -time.
We have thought it necessary to call attention
to these aesthetic subtleties, with more than
ordinary earnestness, because, without a full ap
preciation of their import, it would be absolutely
impossible to attain a clear understanding of our
present position with regard to the great Masters
who originated the dual train of thought we have
endeavoured to describe — the teachers who first
directed their inventive powers into two well-
defined channels, which, running side by side,
and sometimes even intermingling, have never lost
one particle of the individuality bestowed on them
when they first parted at the fountain head.
Upon these two Schools — the Imaginative and
the Romantic — the German Music of the present
century almost entirely depends for its distinc
tive character. Schubert identified himself with
both ; and was enabled, by the freshness and
spontaneity of his ideas, and the inexhaustible
extent of his inventive power, to use the strongest
points of both so profitably, that it is impossible
to determine the side towards which his natural
bias most forcibly attracted him. Perhaps we
shall not be far wrong, if we say that, as a
general rule, his Vocal Music is most freely
pervaded by the spirit of Romanticism, while
that of Imagination is more clearly discernible
in his Instrumental Compositions. Without in
stancing such works as ' Die junge Nonne,' or
'Der Erl-Konig,' the very first bar of which
transports us into the Region of Romance before
we have heard the first word of the Poetry, we
need only point, in confirmation of this view, to
some of the least pretentious of his shorter Songs
— those gorgeous ' trifles/ which, like the sketches
of Raffaelle, contain, sometimes, more Art than
many a more elaborate work. ' Ueber alien Gip-
feln ist Ruh ' is as true a Romance as Schiller's
'Fridolin': while the ' Impromptus,' and ' Mo-
inens Musicals,' so often played, and so rarely
interpreted, contain passages as deeply imagina
tive as those in the Ottet, or the Symphony
in C major. We quote these well-known ex
amples, in the hope of tempting our readers to
seek out others for themselves : and they will
find no difficulty in doing so ; for it is impossible
to take up a volume of Schubert's Compositions,
without finding, on every page, evidence to prove
that he was equally ready, at any moment, to
pursue the course of either stream, or to exchange
it for its fellow channel.
Every really great German Master — Weber,
Spohr, Marschner, Schumann, Mendelssohn,
Brahms, Raff, Goetz, Wagner, — has more or less
strictly carried out the same principle to its
legitimate conclusion, and used either the ideal
freedom of Imagination, or that of Romanticism,
as a stepping-stone to his own individual great
ness.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 293
Weber's strongest sympathies were with the
Romantic School. As a rule, his Instrumental
Music — excepting, of course, the Overtures to
his matchless dramatic inspirations — is brilliant,
rather than imaginative ; presenting, at every
turn, some sparkling passage suggestive, of all
that is light, and bright, and beautiful, in Nature,
and thus continually hovering around the borders
of Romanticism, though rarely descending to
wards those sombre depths in which Beethoven
so frequently delighted to dwell. But, in his
dramatic works, no sooner does some weird idea
present itself to his mind, than he yields himself
to its influence, body and soul, and paints it in
such wild fantastic colours, that his audience
cannot choose but dream, or shrink, or shudder,
at his will.
Spohr's genius led him into quite another path.
Like Schubert, he was equally ready to clothe
his ideas in the language either of Imagination
or Romanticism, or even of both together. A
deeper Philosopher than Weber, he exercised, in
a certain sense, a stronger power over the minds
of his hearers : but, he could not terrify them,
as Weber could ; simply because he was, himself,
too deep a Philosopher to feel terrified, even when
dealing with the Supernatural in its ghastliest
and most unholy manifestations. In one respect,
however, the two were entirely of the same mind.
They both knew the value of Form too well to
neglect it, either in their greater works, or in
those of comparatively small pretension ; and, for
this reason, their writings are invaluable, as ex
amples of the unlimited freedom of thought which
may be made compatible with the most perfect
structural symmetry.
Heinrich Marschner, though neither so in
spired a poet as Weber, nor so deep a philoso
pher as Spohr, did good service, in his generation,
to the cause of Romantic Opera. His two greatest
works, ' Der Vampyr,' and ' Der Templer und
die Jiidin,' though fast losing their popularity,
even in the land of their birth, might be studied,
with advantage, by some who are not likely to
equal, either their richness of imagery or their
musician-like structure. There are passages, in
the former Opera, grim enough to make the
hearer shudder; while the latter breathes the
pure spirit of Chivalry in every Scene. The
passage which describes the midnight carousal of
The Black Knight and Friar Tuck, is a stroke
of genius not lightly to be consigned to oblivion.
If Schumann cared less for accepted forms
than Weber or Spohr, it was only because his
rich vein of original thought enabled him to
strike out new modifications of a general design,
compacted together with no less care than that
adopted by his predecessors, though arranged
on lines peculiarly his own. It would seem,
sometimes, as if the richness — one might almost
say the redundancy — of his inventive power
tempted him to overleap the bounds within which
the most gifted of his associates was perfectly con
tented to dwell. But he neither underrated the
value of self-restraint, nor refrained from turn
ing it to account, in some of his best and most
294 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
important works. And hence it is, that, with all
his freedom of expression, his contempt for con
ventionality, and his inexhaustible fancy, he is one
of the last to be cited as an authority by those
who recognise no law beyond their own caprice.
It would be difficult to imagine two lines of
thought more divergent than those pursued
by Schumann and Mendelssohn. The differ
ence may be partly explained by the different
circumstances under which the two Masters were
trained. The course of Schumann's education was
so changeful, so irregular, that nothing short of
unconquerable determination would have enabled
him to profit by it at all. Mendelssohn, on the
contrary, enjoyed every advantage that care and
counsel could place at his disposal. From his
earliest youth he was made to understand that
natural gifts, untrained by study, would sooner or
later develope themselves into dangerous snares.
And he understood this so well, that, even in his
earliest works, we find an obedience to law, as
strict as that which distinguished him in his prime.
To his well-ordered mind, this subjection to fixed
principles conveyed no idea in the least degree
inconsistent with perfect moral freedom. The
right to think for himself had never been
denied to him ; nor could he, under any circum
stances, have forborne to exercise it. But he
was equally ready, even in his full maturity, to
study the thoughts of others, and to learn from
them all that it is given to man to learn from his
fellow. And so it was, that, while maintaining,
throughout, his own strong masterful individu
ality, he drew, from the accumulated experience
of his predecessors, a store of knowledge well
fitted to serve as a bulwark against the self-
sufficiency which too often ruins a youthful genius,
before his talents have had' time to produce the
effect that might fairly have been expected from
them. From Haydn he learned that perfection
of Form which, from his first work to his last,
clothed the sequence of his ideas with logical
consistency. From Mozart and Beethoven he
learned a system of Instrumentation which, like
a wheel within a wheel, enabled him to work
out another system, entirely his own. From
.Seb. Bach he learned that admirable method of
Part-writing which raised his Compositions far
above the level attained by the best Masters of
the period, and entitled him to rank beside men
whose position had long been regarded as im
pregnable. Dowered with this store of technical
resources, his natural genius carried everything
before it, and, while yet a youth, he was unanim
ously accepted as the leader of the German
Schools. Reading his history with the experience
of half a century to guide us, we can now
understand the true bearings of many things
which could not possibly have been foreseen
during the eventful years of his early residence
at Berlin. Times have changed very much since
then. The freedom from restraint which we
are now taught to reverence, would have been
condemned as midsummer madness, in 1830.
Mendelssohn was no pedant ; but, he never
encouraged the slightest approach to this licen-
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
tious anomaly. Bad Part-writing he could not
endure ; and, by way of safeguard against so
miserable an error he has not only shown us
that Bach's grand style of Part-writing is per
fectly compatible with Haydn's clear principle of
symmetrical design ; but has so entwined the two,
that they have enabled him to form a style,
which, drawing its strength from both, presents
an aspect so free from borrowed charms that we
are compelled to accept it as an original creation.
Not a whit less dangerous is the doctrine that
clearness of design is by no means indispensable,
provided its absence be duly compensated by the
expression of some mystic sentiment, which, if
necessary, may be explained, in so many words,
at the beginning of a work, with a perspicacity
worthy of the limner who wrote beneath his
picture, ' This is a house.' Against this heresy
Mendelssohn waged implacable war ; and he has
left us, in his four Concert Overtures, an antidote
sufficiently strong to neutralise its poison to the
end of time. We need only point to one of them.
The Overture to 'A Midsummer Night's Dream '
contains, in its first ten bars, more Poetry, more
Imagination, more Romance, more Fancy, than
a hundred thousand pages of the jargon which
is forced upon us under the garb of modern
sestheticism ; though its design is as symmetrical
as that of the Overture to ' Figaro,' and as clear
as that of ' La Reine de France.' Yet nowhere
is the Form permitted to obscure, or be obscured
by, the primary intention of the Composition ;
which aims at nothing lower than the perfect
illustration of Shakespeare's meaning. If, then,
Mendelssohn could make shapeliness of contour,
and purity of Harmony, smoothness of Part-
writing, and clearness of Instrumentation, subserve
the purposes of an aim so lofty as this, there must
surely be something wrong in the theory which
represents these qualities as intrinsically opposed
to all advance beyond the rudest forms of pedantry
— the ' rule-and-compass work' suggestive of a
return to the period when Art was in its infancy,
and its union with Poetry impossible.
Had Mendelssohn lived long enough to endow
THE SCHOOL OF LEIPZIG with a patrimony as
rich as that possessed by its Viennese proge
nitor, his earnest work must necessarily have
exerted a purifying influence upon every centre
of Art in Europe. Even now, we cannot say
that it has wholly failed to do so ; for there are
men still living, who have made his principles
their own, and — allowing fair scope for individu
ality — are conscientiously striving to work them
out, whether the outer world cares to accept
them or not. First among these stands Gade,
who, though by birth, education, and national
sympathies, a Dane, spent so interesting a portion
of his life in Leipzig, and worked so earnestly there,
in conjunction with Mendelssohn, that it is im
possible to overlook his relationship to the Classical
German School. This relationship, however, ex
tends no farther than technical construction. In
their inner life, his Compositions are too intensely
Scandinavian to assimilate with those of any Ger
man author, antient or modern. His Overture,
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
'Nachklange aus Ossian ' is a Runic Poem, worthy
of recitation in the Walhalla. Its bold fierce Sub
ject breathes the spirit of the Northern Myth so
clearly, that we may safely accept it — in com
mon with the lovely Melodies of ' Comala,' which
form its natural complement — as an inspiration
from the land of the Aurora borealis and the
Midnight Sun. But, in the matter of outward
form, he has thought it no treason to enter into
an openly-confessed alliance with his German
neighbours. Strikingly original in his system of
Instrumentation, he has never suffered it to lead
him into extravagance or confusion ; nor has he
ever used his glowing vein of Poetry as an excuse
for negligent arrangement of his harmonic com
binations, or for rudeness of design. In all that
concerns the technique of his delightful produc
tions, he has been loyal, from first to last, to the
principles he adopted on his first entrance into
the artistic world ; and there is good hope that
his work will outlive the caprice of fashion which
has brought these principles, for the moment, into
something very nearly allied to contempt.
It was of immense advantage to the cause of
Art, that Mendelssohn's interpretation of its
classical form and spirit should be perpetuated
by men like Gade, and Hauptmann, and Hiller,
and Sterndale Bennett ; that his memory should
be reverenced by Schumann, and the proselytes
of a newer faith ; and, that his works should be
held, both in Germany and England, in higher
reputation than those of any other writer of the
age. But they were not destined to escape hostile
criticism. Before the production of 'Elijah,' more
than one promising young Composer had ventured
to claim the right of thinking for himself. One of
the most talented of these was Johannes Brahms;
from whom great things were expected, even
before his views were sufficiently matured to
enable him to stand forth as the originator of a
special line of thought. Though attached to the
Conservative Party by many noble sympathies,
his conceptions were too original, and his indi
viduality too strong, to admit of his working
on any other lines than those laid down by him
self. It soon became evident that his affections
were entirely with the Imaginative School ; and
his attachment to it has remained undiminished.
Like all earnest sympathisers with its aim and
spirit, he has used elasticity of Form freely;
but always with a healthy recognition of the
boundary line which distinguishes elasticity from
distortion. His First Symphony, in C minor
(op. 68)— a work produced after his genius had
attained its full maturity — is a case in point.
Departing, in no essential particular, from the
accepted model, it presents so many traits of
original thought, so many welcome novelties,
both of idea and construction, that, while recog
nising it as a legitimate descendant of the Schools
of Leipzig and Vienna, we cannot but feel that
it leads us into regions hitherto unexplored. The
fertility of invention which forms one of its most
prominent characteristics could scarcely have
failed to tempt a Composer of ordinary calibre
into hopeless departure from a consistent line of
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 295
argument ; but it did not so tempt Brahms.
With all its wealth of imagery, the work pro
claims its raison d'etre in the first seven bars
of its introductory ' Un poco sostenuto ' ; and,
from the thesis there proposed, it never diverges.
The text is illustrated, at every turn, by some
unexpected comment, often extremely beautiful,
and always pertinent and welcome ; but it works
out its appointed meaning, without interruption,
from beginning to end ; and by no means in unor
thodox fashion. The First Part of the Allegro
is duly repeated ; the customary return to the
primary Subject is made in the accustomed
manner ; and the Movement fulfils all the needful
conditions of Classical Form, while the Composer
gives free scope to his Imagination, throughout.
The ' Andante sostenuto,' in the unexpected Key
of E Major, fulfils the same conditions to the letter.
The ' Un poco Allegretto e grazioso/ in Ab, takes
the place, and satisfactorily performs the office,
of the Scherzo. And the work concludes with a
noble Finale, in C major, which forms a fitting
climax to the whole. But here, again, the author
introduces an unexpected feature. The Finale is
so constructed, that it would scarcely have made
the logical sequence of the intended climax ap
parent, had it fallen into its place in the usual
way. Therefore the Composer has prepared it by
an introductory ' Adagio,' perhaps the most in
teresting member of the entire work. As the whole
essence of the First Allegro was compressed into
the opening bars of its Preface, so is the whole
essence of the Finale compressed into this beau
tiful Adagio, which thus forms the support of the
entire work, the clue to its consistent interpre
tation, and the most important link in the chain
of continuity which binds its elements together
so closely, that, to understand it at all, we must
understand it as the natural development of a
single thought. In the Second Symphony, in D
(op. 73), we find the same regularity of design,
the same fixity of purpose, the same exuberance
of subsidiary ideas, and the same .depth of Ima
gination. The same broad characteristics are
exhibited, in a marked degree, in the ' Tragic
Overture' (op. 81), in combination with a direct
and irresistible appeal to feelings, which, though
subjectively treated in the Score, may be very
easily invested with an objective sense by the
hearer, who has only to connect the Music with
some deeply tragic history of his own invention,
in order to transfer it from the Imaginative to
the Romantic School — a curious illustration of
the line which parts the School to which Brahms
has attached himself from that adopted by some
other German writers of whom we shall speak
presently.
The beauty of all these Compositions is greatly
enhanced by the character of their Instrumenta
tion. A Score by Brahms presents, at the first
glance, an appearance not unlike that of a Vocal
Composition for several distinct Choirs. The
masses of Stringed and Wind Instruments are
so often treated antiphonally, that the contrasts
presented by their differences of tone serve as a
valuable means of imparting clearness to passages
296 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
which, without such aid, would lose force through
their too great complexity. While the balance be
tween these subdivisions of the Orchestra is always
maintained, the Stringed foundation is so solidified
as to afford, at all times, a sufficient support to the
entire mass of Harmony; and the whole is thus
invested with a dignity too real to be injured by
the constant variety of effect, which, if less artis
tically managed, would degenerate into restless
ness. In the intermediate 'Adagio' of the First
Symphony, the Violins are employed con sordini,
and the Tenors, divisi, with a delicacy of effect
which has sometimes led to a comparison of the
Movement with similar passages by Wagner.
But, in truth, the arrangement has long been
received as common property ; and it is only by
marked novelty of treatment that it can be justly
claimed as a private possession.
We have already described Brahms's most
important Choral Composition — the ' Deutsches
Kequiem' — at some considerable length.1 Many
more of his Vocal works are well worth separate
examination ; but it must be confessed that his
real greatness shines forth most clearly in his
Instrumental Music. His choral passages — often
furiously difficult, and sometimes all but im
possible — are, as a general rule, constructed with
so little consideration for the Singer, that, even
when their crudities are successfully overcome,
they fail to produce an effect worth the labour of
mastering them. This misfortune is the more
to be regretted, because, in some of these very
works, the Orchestral Accompaniments embody
his best conceptions. There are but few passages
in the ' Schicksalslied' — for example — which
would fail to produce a very striking effect,
though the Vocal Parts were eliminated from the
Score. But surely it cannot be right, that, when
Voices are employed, they should be treated with
less consideration than the Instruments which
accompany them. This evil, however, is too
general to admit of discussion here ; and is, un
happily, gaining ground everywhere.
While Brahms, as yet unknown beyond the
limits of a small circle of admirers, was steadily
working out the theories upon which his adopted
style was based, Joachim Raff's strong sym
pathy with the Eomantic School led him into
a very different path, and necessarily tempted
him to demand a considerable amount of free
dom from scholastic restraint. But, he has
never allied himself with the advocates of law
lessness. Nor has he claimed exemption from
established formulae, except when compelled to
follow out a self-imposed rule of conduct by the
character of the subject he designed to treat. His
Fourth Symphony, in G minor (op. 167), is a
miracle of regularity — making due allowance for
the age in which it was produced. Save only
that the First Part of the Allegro is not repeated,
it might serve as a model of the orthodox mode
of treatment. If its Subjects are not strikingly
original, they are surrounded by so much new and
varied Instrumentation, and so much careful and
1 See vol. iii. p. 112.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
ingenious Part-writing, that they are constantly
presented in an original aspect. The Andante
flows on, in an uninterrupted stream of Melody,
from beginning to end ; and the strongest points
of the Allegro are reflected, with increased in
terest, in the spirited Finale. This particular
work, however, cannot be accepted as the true
reflex of the Composer's favourite style. He is
never so happy as when, with some weird Legend
in his mind, he throws his whole soul into the
task of depicting its shadowy incidents. And
the tints in which he presents them are rich
indeed ; for his power of tone-painting is un
bounded, and his command of orchestral colouring
unlimited.
In the 'Lenore Symphony' (op. 177), we see
all these qualities exhibited to perfection. The
wayward character of Burger's heroine is painted
to the life. The first two Movements present the
varying phases of her feverish love, in moods,
all more or less earnest, yet always savouring
rather of the passionate caprice of a self-willed
child than the modest affection of a well-trained
maiden. Then comes the parting. The soldier-
lover is summoned to the war. In the midst of
the March which describes his departure, the
unhappy girl bemoans her misery before all the
world, while the young hero vainly strives to
comfort her, in accents as gentle and sensuous
as her own. It is the same wild passion over
again. We knew, all along, that she would lose
all self-control when the moment of trial came.
But this is only the preamble to the story.
The Finale takes it up, at the moment in which
Biirger's Ballad begins. The lurid sunrise brings
no comfort to the wretched dreamer. We hear
her sighs, interrupted by the approach of the
Spectre Bridegroom, whose identity with the
Lover of the previous Scene is proclaimed by
a shadowy allusion to the March. Then follows
the invitation to the wedding feast. The Phantom
Charger paws the ground, impatient to be gone.
The Lovers mount ; and he carries them off,
in an infernal gallop which introduces us to the
finest part of the Symphony. The ghastly ride is
described by the Violoncellos, in persistent groups
of a Quaver and two Semiquavers, which never
cease until the catastrophe of the story is at hand.
This passage forms the life of the picture, through
out. Constant in its rhythmic ictus, though not
confined to any fixed series of notes, it represents
the entire course of the fearful journey; thus
intensifying in the Music, the idea of headlong
speed, which, in the Poem, is so powerfully en
forced by the reiteration of its most famous Stanza.
When the excitement of the situation increases,
the Violoncellos are strengthened by the Violas.
When a climax is reached, the Figure is taken
up by the entire Stringed Band. When the ex
pression of some particular incident demands its
retirement, it fades into pianissimo. Meanwhile,
the scenery of the eldritch phantasmagoria is
pictured by the Wind Instruments. The shrieks
of the nightbirds, by long shrill trills upon the
Wood Wind. The ghostly Funeral, by a Hymn
for the Dead, first sadly moaned by the Trombones,
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
and then repeated with the united strength of the
full Orchestra, while the dagmoniac gallop rushes on,
through it all. The fetter-dance of the gibbetted
malefactors is represented by a transient change
to Triple Time, the rhythm of the gallop remain
ing undisturbed. At times, when these unholy
sounds are hushed, the terrified, yet still unsub
dued Lenore murmurs soft reminiscences of the
love-passages in the earlier Movements; and,
sometimes, she and her grisly Bridegroom dis
course in little passages of well-constructed Canon.
At last, when dawn begins to break, the gallop
ceases ; the Fiery Steed melts into vapour ; and
an awful moment of silence ensues. The lonely
Churchyard is reached. Again, we have another
and a far more solemn Funeral Hymn, this time
sung for Lenore herself. The soft etherial motion
of the accompanying Violins gives it a celestial
meaning, impossible to be mistaken. And, as
in the closing lines of the Poem itself, we are
told that the sinner is forgiven.
The same power is proclaimed in Raff's Third
Symphony, 'Im Walde' (op. 153). The First
Movement depicts the Woods in their noontide
beauty. The Second, their appearance in the
Twilight. The Third, a Dance of Dryads. The
Finale, the deepening shades of Night. These
shades, however, are haunted by a horror as grue
some as that in 'Lenore.' The stillness of the
Forest is represented by a quiet Fugal Subject,
treated with exceeding ingenuity and skill, and
suggestive of repose, unbroken by the rustling of
a leaf. Suddenly, the weird notes of a hellish
tumult are faintly heard in the distance. The
Wild Huntsman, with his spectral Host, is ap
proaching. He draws nearer and nearer, until
the whole air is filled with the yells of his un
earthly followers. We hear them above our
heads, behind, around, and everywhere, until
the hideous throng has passed, and its howls
have died away in the distance. The silence of
night descends once more upon the Forest, but
again, in strict accordance with the Legend,
the Fiendish Bout returns, draws nearer, as
before, and vanishes in the opposite direction :
after which, the Symphony concludes with a
burst of Sunrise. And here, whether con
sciously or unconsciously we cannot tell, but
with equal merit in either case, Raff has esta
blished a great Romantic truth. The Wild
Huntsman first became identified with modern
Art, in ' Der Freischiitz.' At the casting of the
Fifth Bullet, he is represented, on the Stage,
with the best effect permitted by circumstances,
and, in the Orchestra, with such consummate
power of Instrumental imagery, that we need
not look towards the Stage, in order to realise
his presence. Now, Kaff 's Music bears no ex
ternal resemblance whatever to Weber's ; yet,
it brings us face to face with the same Wild
Huntsman. We recognise him at a glance ; and
that, in the absence of the slightest taint of
plagiarism. Had Titian, and Giorgione, been
commissioned to paint the portrait of the same
Doge, they would each have enabled us to re
cognise the individual, though theirpictures would
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 297
have been altogether different. So it is in this
case. And we cannot but think, that, though
Weber's conceptions stand unrivalled, Raff also
has shown himself a consummate Master.
Brahms and Raff may be accepted as the
greatest living representatives of the Imagina
tive and Romantic Schools, respectively. But
they do not stand alone. Another young Com
poser has been called away, too soon, alas ! for
Art ; though not before he had attained a solid
reputation. Goetz first attracted public attention
by the production of a clever Comic Opera, ' The
Taming of the Shrew,' performed at Mannheim
in 1874, under the title of ' Der Widerspanstigen
Zahinung,' a work planned neither upon the old
lines nor the new. It differs from the traditional
form of Comic Opera in being written for full
Orchestra, throughout, without either Recitativo
seccoy or spoken dialogue ; in passing continuously
from Scene to Scene, with no break whatever,
until the fall of the Curtain at the end of
an Act; in dispensing, for the most part,
with symmetrical Movements of the older forms ;
and, in substituting for them long passages of
Accompanied Recitative. On the other hand, it
departs from the principles laid down by the
latest leaders of fashion, in that it relieves the
monotony of its declamatory passages by fre
quent long strains of tuneful Measured Music,
consisting, not of mere snatches of Melody, but
of continuous and well-constructed phrases, so
consistently put together, as to invest the whole
chain of Movements with a character not un
like that of an unnaturally developed Finale.
Moreover, it is something to be able to say
that the vocal passages are always really vocal,
and framed with real care for the Voice. That
we miss, even in the most broadly comic Scenes
the racy abandon of the Italian Opera Buffa —
the refined sense of humour which would have
made such a subject, in the hands of Cimarosa,
or Rossini, simply irresistible — is to be attri
buted rather to the effect of national than indi
vidual temperament. In fact, there are reasons
for believing, that, had the Composer's life been
prolonged, he would have distinguished himself
more highly in Serious than in Comic Opera. His
greater Instrumental Works are pervaded by a
tone of earnest thought which promise much for
the future. His Symphony in F (op. 9), is full
of feeling, clear in design, and abounding in pas
sages of rich and varied Instrumentation. In
some respects, his Pianoforte Concerto in Bb
(op. 1 8), is still finer; and, though less homo
geneous in structure, even more full of interest,
in its treatment, both of the Solo Instrument and
the Orchestra. Still we cannot believe that any
of these works, or even the unfinished Opera
'Francesca di Rimini,' indicate, either the full
extent of the young Composer's ideal, or the point
he was capable of reaching ; though they prove
how much we have lost by his early death.
Anton Rubinstein, first known to the world as
a Pianist of altogether exceptional power, and
afterwards as a writer of Pianoforte Music of
more than ordinary interest, now claims our
298 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
attention as the Composer of a long succession
of works, designed on a scale much grander than
that foreshadowed in his earlier efforts, and
worthy of much more serious study — as furnish
ing clearer indications of the principles by which
he is guided. Unmoved by the revolutionary
tendencies of an age which has identified itself
with swift progress and violent reform, Rubin
stein has consistently abstained from fraternising
with any prominent party : not, like a dry pedant,
blindly following in the wake of greater men. than
himself ; but, as an original thinker, honestly con
vinced, that, within certain limits, classical forms
are the best forms, and expressing this conviction,
in his works, with a boldness which has secured
him the respect of many advanced 'reformers'
who are very far from agreeing either with his
practice or his principles. These latter may be
briefly described as the unconscious result of a
determination to reject, as heterodox, no means
of developing the capabilities of an original idea,
provided only that neither the idea nor the mode
of treatment refuse to submit to some sort of
orderly arrangement. The effects of this deter
mination are as patent in Rubinstein's Chamber
Music, as in his Concertos or his Symphonies.
All are essentially modern in style, and, it must be
confessed, marred not unfrequently by a violence
of expression savouring rather of impulse than of
careful thought. Yet the design, even of his
' Ocean Symphony ' — probably the finest, and
certainly the most imaginative of all — betrays a
familiarity with classical models which the de
scriptive character of the piece may disguise,
but certainly does not neutralise. Though his
latest Opera, 'Demonic,' is so strikingly original,
that it has been described as belonging to no
School whatever, its strong dramatic character,
tinged with a curiously Tartar colouring, in
illustration of the story, does not prevent him
from using many familiar forms, consecrated, by
long tradition, to the Lyric Stage, and thus
making the Music valuable, for its own sake,
apart from its primary office of assisting the
Action of the piece. It is impossible but that
the well-planned conduct of such Music should
tend to its longevity ; though, at present, public
opinion runs strongly in the opposite direction.
We speak of Rubinstein in our notice of the
German School, because, notwithstanding his
nationality, his sympathies are evidently with
the greatest German Masters. For the same
reason we speak of Anton 1 Dvorak — another
strong advocate for the retention of the princi
ples by which the great family of Classical Com
posers has so long been guided. The numerous
instrumental works of this talented Bohemian
prove him to be one of the greatest Masters of
modern Part-writing now living ; and are re
markable for a continuity of treatment, inex
pressibly refreshing in these days of spasmodic
phrasing and broken Melody, suggestive rather
of the unfinished sentences of a faltering orator
than of a well-studied work of Art. The most
marked characteristic of Dvorak's style is singu-
l Pronounced Dvorshak. [See Appendix, DvolUK.]
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
larly antagonistic to that of Brahms. We have
said that Brahms delights in illustrating his Sub
ject with a copious embroidery of lateral motivi.
Dvorak, on the contrary, makes his Subject
illustrate itself, to the almost total exclusion of
all ideas not directly traceable to its outward
configuration. In both cases, the device is legiti
mate, and valuable ; and, in both, it clearly
emanates from a source inseparable from the
Composer's natural temperament.
Did space permit, we would gladly speak, in
detail, of Hiller, the friend of Mendelssohn and
Chopin ; of Kiel, whose ' Second Requiem ' has
lately produced so marked an effect in Berlin ; of
Briill, Goldmark and Scharwenka ; of Reinecke,
R. Franz, Julius Rbntgen, and many another
worshipper at the Shrine of Art. But it is time
that we should turn to a class of Composers whose
works have attracted more attention than those
of any other writers of the present day.
Chopin's close sympathy with the Imaginative
School is evident at a glance ; yet it is with its
inner life alone that he claims relationship. Not
only does he utterly repudiate its external me
chanism, its harmonic combinations, its methods
of development, one and all; but, he does not
even accord with it in his manner of expressing
a simple idea. The more closely we study his
works, the more plainly shall we see, that, with
him, the idea and its treatment invariably owed
their origin to the inspiration of a single thought.
Both suggested themselves at the same moment;
and therefore remained for ever indivisible. To
this, his writings are indebted for a personality
which sets imitation at defiance. He stands
alone. But, the inspirations of his loneliness are
open to all who are capable of sympathising with
the Poetry of Art ; and, for these, the charm of
his Music will never pass away.
A certain analogy is traceable between the
genius of Chopin and that of Liszt. A strong
feeling of personality pervades the Music of both.
But Chopin's personality has never changed.
We see the same man, in his first work and his
last ; whereas Liszt's Ideal has changed a hun
dred times. Much of his Music is, in the highest
degree, both Romantic, and Imaginative, at the
same moment. In technical matters, he submits
to no law whatever. The Compositions which
seem most faithfully to represent the man him
self are absolutely amorphous. Yet one rarely
finds, even in them, the spontaneity so obvious
in all the works of Chopin. The idea seems to
have been worked out — though in some way
unknown to the laws of Art. With all this,
Liszt stands as much alone as Chopin. He has
had, and still has, disciples ; but his ideas, and
his method of treating them, are too much a
part of himself to admit the possibility of his
founding a School.
We have already spoken freely of the theories,
and productions, of Richard Wagner, in another
place.2 No one who has thought upon the subject
at all will attempt to controvert Wagner's main
proposition, that Dramatic Truth is the first
2 See vol. ii. pp. 526-529.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
necessity of Dramatic Music ; and, that all minor
considerations must be sacrificed to it. For this
principle Peri fought the Madrigalists, whose true
place was clearly not on the Stage. Through his
hearty recognition of this, Monteverde became
the most popular Composer in Italy. For the
sake of re-habilitating this, Gluck forsook his own
people, and taught the Parisians what an Opera
ought to be. Truly, the considerations these
great men were ready to sacrifice were no mean
ones. The Italians immolated Polyphony ; while
Gluck risked the reputation of a life-time, by
spurning the popular demand for an Opera, in the
guise of a Concert of detached and inconsequent
Songs. But, even Gluck was not prepared to
sacrifice everything. We have already shown that
he was not prepared to sacrifice Euphony.1 Nor
was he willing to dispense with definite form —
except when definite form was manifestly out of
place. The dullest hearer must have felt that it
was lamentably out of place, when, as in the
Operas of Hasse, the Action of the Drama was
brought to a dead-lock, in order that its hero
might amuse his audience with a brilliant Eondo.
But, we cannot feel much respect for critics
who tell us that the Action of 'Le Nozze di
Figaro ' is stopped by ' Non piu andrai,' or that
of 'II Don Giovanni,' by 'La ci darem.' It is
precisely because such pieces as these carry on
the Action of the Drama so delightfully, that
they produce so much more effect on the Stage
than in the Concert-Boom : and, in the case of
' Non piu andrai,' the Rondo form adds immensely
to the dramatic interest of the Song. Why, then,
eliminate the Rondo form, after Mozart has
shown how much can be done with it ? Why
not rather try to write Rondos as good, as beau
tiful, and as dramatic, as his ? We know one
man who could write a Rondo worthy to live
for ever, if only he chose to throw his heart
into the task ; and, unless the experience of
all history lies to us, that man will be lovingly
remembered, by Senta's Ballad, 'Traft ihr das
Scbiff,' ages after his Operas have ceased to be
performed in their entirety. If evil combinations,
and unconnected arguments, and a weary waste
of interminable Recitative, be really necessary to
the existence of Dramatic Music — so necessary,
that genius capable of delighting us with pleasant
Harmony, and structural symmetry, and Melodies
of acknowledged beauty, must needs deny us these
luxuries, in order that the Lyric Drama may rest
upon a philosophical basis — there are not a few
among us quite ready to vote for the retention of
the luxuries, even at the cost of leaving the Lyric
Drama in the condition to which Mozart and Weber
reduced it. Granted that the combinations are
not always evil, the argument not always un
connected, the Recitative not always dreary,
nor always unrelieved by tuneful episodes and
delicious Instrumentation ; still, there must be
something radically wrong in a system which
admits the introduction of deformity, under any
circumstances whatever. Now, deformity — the
natural antithesis of shapeliness — can and often
i See p. 290 a.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 299
does, co-exist with perfect beauty of constituent
parts. Whether these parts be, in themselves,
ugly, or beautiful, if they be not fitly joined
together, they unite to form a monster. It is
only when artistically arranged, that euphonious
words are transformed into Poetry, or radiant
colours into Painting. We have been told, of
late years, that this law does not apply to Music,
which must not be clothed in the frigid formality
peculiar to the Plastic Arts ; but this reasoning
is false, and would degrade Music to the level
of a mere sensual enjoyment. If Music is to
reach the intellect, it needs the evidence of a pre
conceived and carefully-considered design. The
symmetrical form of the Eroica Symphony is as
necessary to its perfection, as a work of Art
intended to appeal to the understanding through
the medium of the ear, as the curves of the Venus
of Milo are, to one intended to speak to it through
the medium of the eye. Without its curves, the
statue would be a shapeless block of marble.
Without its plan, the Symphony would be a
chain of meaningless Chords. And what is true
of the Symphony, is true of all other kinds of
Music. If it could really be demonstrated that
Music, addressed to the intellect by means of
the logical development of a well-considered
thesis, was antagonistic to the progress of the
Lyric Drama, the demonstration would amount
to a positive proof that Music and the Drama
were incompatible existences ; and, this once
proved, all subsequent attempts to present them
in combination would savour, not merely of
aesthetic inconsistency, but of treason to Art
itself. Some critics, denying the charge of in
consistency, affirm that the antagonism of which
they complain is incontestable. But it is not so.
Neither in Instrumental nor Dramatic Music is
symmetry incompatible with expression. We
need not go back to the classical age, for proofs
of so manifest a truism ; for, some of the ablest
living Composers are proving it, every day.
Brahms and Raff are not the only writers who
have found full freedom for the inner life of the
Imaginative and Romantic Schools, within the
limits of strict symphonic propriety. MaxBruch
has even gone beyond them, in the same direction.
In his Violin Concerto in G minor, dedicated to
Joachim, he discusses his Subjects so thoroughly,
and with such minute attention to their bearing
upon the general design, that his Movements
stand forth as a living protest against the crippled
invention which mistakes the transposition of
some eight or ten inconsequent notes, into so
many incongruous keys, for a well ordered and
interesting construction. Yet, no one who has
listened to the first two pages of the introductory
Allegro will deny its imaginative power. In
the domain of Dramatic Music, Bruch manifests
— as in his Scenic Cantata, ' Odysseus' — a closer
and more genuine sympathy with the canons laid
down by Gluck, than we find in the works of
many writers who profess to look upon Gluck
himself as a beginner. All that Gluck has
claimed, in connection with the Stage, Bruch
has here used, apart from it ; and, so well that
300 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
we miss neither the Scenery nor the Action.
This power of writing good Dramatic Music for
the Concert-Room is not common. Mendelssohn
exhibits it in the ' Walpurgis Nacht,' Gade in
'Comala,' and Bruch in 'Odysseus': but most
young aspirants either overshoot the mark, or
fall below it. Bruch has fallen into neither error ;
and, meanwhile, has taken good care that his
Music shall not fail through want of constructive
cohesion. In citing him as an authority, we are
actuated by no controversial spirit, nor desire for
an invidious comparison. But the important
appointment which Bruch is now filling at Liver
pool, gives his works the opportunity of becoming
as popular in England as they are in Germany,
and thus renders them apt illustrations of the
point in question. In many respects, an inferior
Composer would have served our purpose equally
well. We frequently find many poor ideas
grouped together with the most perfect regu
larity; while rich ones are exhibited in a con
fused heap, destitute of any arrangement at all.
In the one case, the result fails through the
weakness of its conception ; in the other, through
the inconsequence of its argument. The one
appeals too little to the senses ; the other, too
little to the intellect. The senses may be per
fectly satisfied, so long as each character in the
Drama is labelled with a distinct melodic phrase,
as each locality was labelled, in the days of
Shakspeare : but, the intellect demands some
thing more than this ; and that something more
is, a clearness of narration, which, apart from
the extraneous influence of new Instruments in
troduced into the Orchestra, of alternate crashes
and tremolos, and of declamation continued ad
nauseam, shall appeal to the mind as well as to
the passions, and thus prevent the Lyric Drama
from sinking, eventually, to the level of a Serious
Extravaganza, or a Tragic Pantomime.
To sum up our argument, we see that the
pedigree, even of this latest development of
modern progress, descends to us, in a direct line,
from the time of Prastorius, through the chain of
the Bachs, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert,
Spohr, and Mendelssohn. The modern system of
Part-writing, now universally accepted in place of
the Counterpoint of the 1 6th century, originated
in the growing taste for Instrumental Music con
cerning which we learn so much from the details
handed down to us in the ' Syntagma.' Under
Seb. Bach, this system reached its culminating
point, in the Fugue. For this, Haydn substituted
the Sonata-form; giving it, in Ssecular Music,
the office performed by the Fugue in the Oratorio.
Over this form Mozart obtained an absolute
mastery: but he did not leave it where he
found it. It was he who first invested it with
dramatic power, and first succeeded in making
that power subservient to the expression of every
shade of passion, or of feeling, demanded by his
subject. Witness his Overture to * II Don Gio
vanni,' which depicts the determined resistance of
the hero of the piece to the warnings of the Statue,
the threatenings of Don Ottavio, and the gentler
counsels of Zerlina, and Donna Elvira, with such
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
life-like accuracy, that the Movement serves as an
epitome of the entire story. Moreover, he showed,
in the Overture to ' Die Zauberflote,' and the
Finale to the 'Jupiter Symphony,' that the two
great manifestations of the older and the newer
systems were neither antagonistic nor incapable
of amalgamation : and thus produced, in one splen
did inspiration of genius, a third form, identical
with neither, though compounded of both — the
Symphonic Fugue. Beethoven next demonstrated
the permissibility of extending the limits of the
Sonata-form, in any desired direction, so widely,
that, while offering no restraint whatever to the
wildest flights of his Imagination, it enabled him
to express his ideas with a clearness of argument
which has never been exceeded. His immediate
successors accepted this position in its fullest
significance : and, attaching themselves either to
the Imaginative or to the Romantic School, de
manded the freedom from restraint which true
Genius claims as its birthright, and which no true
Child of Genius has ever yet been known to betray.
In so far as this freedom has tended to clothe the
comparative meagreness of earlier forms with a
richer veil of poetical imagery, its influence has
never been otherwise than healthy and invigor
ating. But, it has not always been thus wisely
employed. It has tempted the neophyte to in
dulge his fancy, when he ought to have been
writing Thorough-bass exercises, as Beethoven
did before him ; and to abuse gifts, which, pro
perly cultured, might have led to something
worth preservation. It has tempted false teachers
to tell him that the Sonata-form itself is an archaic
monstrosity, unworthy of his respect, and only
used by Beethoven himself, under the influence
of some strange hallucination the root of which
it is impossible to discover. That such abuses
are only too prevalent, experience has abundantly
proved ; and it is to be feared that they are in
separable from this peculiar manifestation of
artistic power : in which case, their presence
must be accepted as a proof that the modern
German Schools contain within themselves the
elements of their own destruction.
XXXII.In forming THE ITALIAN SCHOOL OFTHE
IQTH CENTURY, Rossini — perhaps unwittingly-
borrowed not a little from his Teutonic brethren.
His Instrumental Accompaniments far exceed,
both in volume and complication, the modest
standard adopted by Cimarosa, and certainly owe
something to the influence of Haydn and Mozart.
His Harmony, too, is both richer and more
varied than that of his Italian contemporaries ;
and is probably indebted to Vienna for something
more than an occasional suggestion. Yet the
basis of his style, in all essential particulars, is
thoroughly Italian, and thoroughly his own-
Italian, in the airy lightness of its Melodies ; his
own, in its unwonted freshness, even for Italy,
and in the passionate expression which adds so
much to its dramatic power, without diminishing
its briUiancy. What the Romanticism of Weber
and Spohr is to the German School, this despe
rate passion is to the later Schools of Italy. I*
must always seem extravagant, to those whose
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
taste is formed on Northern models. But it is no
ignoble characteristic ; for it is founded upon
Nature, as exhibited in the impulsive tempera
ment of the South. And, it is always true. The
climax always comes in the right place ; and the
moment of exhaustion follows, naturally, in due
course. Rossini first made it a necessity. Bellini
threw his whole soul into it. Donizetti — a more
cultivated Musician than Bellini, though, with
less exceptional natural gifts — used it no less
skilfully than his predecessors. And time has
proved that these defenders of the true Italian
style were in the right. Mercadante felt this
strongly, and turned his conviction to account :
while a host of inferior Composers followed the
leading of these powerful Chiefs; some doing
good work of an inferior grade ; others doing their
best to vulgarise that which really contains the
very essence of refinement ; but none venturing
to dispute the one great principle, that, deprived
of its passionate expression, its melodious grace,
and its perfect adaptation of vocal passages to
vocal capabilities, their School could no longer
exist. When Grisi and Mario were in their
prime, and Verdi on his trial, the truth of this
principle was universally accepted. Among the
most popular Composers then living, there was
not one, in any part of Italy, strong enough to
set it at defiance. No Italian Opera, destitute of
passion, of melody, or of vocal propriety, would
have lived through its first night. But, within
the last few years, a notable revolution has taken
place. It is impossible to say whether the change
was due to the Italians themselves ; or was
imported into Italy from foreign sources. But, it
is manifestly unfair to assert, as some have done,
that the movement is due to the influence of
Wagner. It is true that its promoters have, to
a certain extent, adopted the theories proposed
by the German Master ; inasmuch as they regard
the symmetrically-constructed Aria as incom
patible with the healthy development of the
Lyric Drama, and, on that account, eliminate it,
in favour of declamatory Recitative, and Instru
mental Tone-painting, subordinating the claims,
even of these powerful vehicles of expression, in
their turn, to those of the Poetry, the Scenery,
and the Action of the Story. But these restric
tions, proclaimed by Peri, in the i6th century,
and advocated by Gluck, in the i8th, are not
altogether ignored by Meyerbeer and Gounod;
and, since it is notorious that the best modern
Italian Singers have achieved great successes in
the Operas of these two Composers, it is more
reasonable to believe that the latest Italian writers
have been tempted, by this circumstance, to
modify their style, than to suppose that they
adopted their ideas from Munich. Be this as
it may, the movement is a res facta ; and the
present Italian Composers no longer care to
write in the true Italian manner.
The standard of revolt was first raised, by
Verdi, at Venice, in the year 1857; and the
result of his experiment was, the utter failure
of his Opera ' Simone Boccanegra.'
But Verdi was not the only believer in the
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 301
new theory — the hated avvenerismo of the Ita
lian dilettanti. A formidable body of young
Composers soon joined the insurgent ranks, and
laboured so enthusiastically in the cause of ' pro
gress,' that they have already secured a strong
revulsion of public feeling in its favour. Fore
most amongst these are Arrigo Boi'to, Alfredo
Catalani, Filippo Marchetti, Amilcare Pon-
chielli, Anteri-Manzocchi, and the clever Contra-
bassist, Bottesini ; Composers who have all made
more or less impression upon the public, and
whose works, whether good or bad, have at least
sufficient individuality to secure them against
the charge of servile plagiarism.
That the success of the Italian reform — if
'reform' it may be called — is almost entirely
due to Verdi's clear-sightedness and persever
ance, there can be no doubt. Well knowing the
goal to which his new ideas must lead, he was
not to be deterred from reaching it, by the dis
approval of a Venetian audience. His earlier
Operas were uniformly indebted, for their repu
tation, to a few catching Melodies, adapted to
the taste of the period ; the Music apportioned
to the Action of the Drama being put together
with so little care that it was difficult for a cul
tivated audience to listen to it. In ' Simone
Boccanegra' the new convert endeavoured to
remedy this defect, not by any startling change
of style or method, but by devoting serious atten
tion to points which he had too much neglected
in his youthful works. These innovations were
small indeed compared with those destined to
follow. We have seen how the audience received
them. We have now to see how Verdi received
the judgment of the audience. In his later
Operas, he gradually introduced a real change of
style. Yet, some of these have achieved a far
more lasting success than that which followed the
most popular of his earlier efforts. In judging
these transitional works, we cannot but see that
he still felt doubts as to the mode in which they
might be most effectively treated. As time pro
gressed, these doubts merged, one by one, into
certainties ; until, in 'Aida,' first produced at
Cairo in 1872, we find the fullest enuntiation of
the principles at issue, which the Composer has
hitherto given to the world. It would not be
safe to regard even 'Ai'da' in any other light than
that of a tentative production ; but it at least
discloses Verdi's idea of the goal to which the
new movement is tending ; and it is especially
interesting as a proof that his ideal differs, very
materially, in one point — the most important of
all — from the standard aimed at by the most
ambitious and the most prominent of his fellow-
reformers. He has given up the orthodox form
of the Aria d'entrata, the Cabbaletta, and the
Canzonetta; he has welded his Movements to
gether, so as to produce the effect of a continuous
dramatic whole ; he has centred more interest in
his declamatory passages, and his orchestral pic
tures, than in his passages of flowing Melody —
but, that stream of Melody is never wanting. It
may be broken into a thousand scattered phrases ;
it may lack the continuity necessary to ensure a
302 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
good effect apart from its Stage surroundings ;
but it is always there. And so long as Verdi
preserves it as an indispensable feature in his
work, so long will that work outlive the greatest
successes of the best of his imitators. That he
means to preserve it is evident ; for, not many
months ago, he brought out at Milan a revised
edition of ' Simone Boccanegra,' with a new Li
bretto by his friend Boito, in which the original
Melodies are retained, while the dramatic por
tions of the work are brought into even greater
prominence than the corresponding divisions of
' Aida' : and in this form the Opera has achieved
an immense success.
Of the ' Requiem,' composed in honour of
Manzoni, we shall speak elsewhere. But, what
ever our opinion of Verdi's merits, as a Composer
of Sacred Music, it seems certain, that, in his
later dramatic works, he has proved himself a
convert to opinions, which, thirty years ago, he
would probably have emphatically condemned.
We have said, that the Libretto of ' Simone
Boccanegra' was remodelled, not long ago, by
Arrigo Bo'ito. This profound Scholar, and true
Italian Poet, exercises, upon the Lyric Drama
of the present day, an influence somewhat ana
logous to that of Metastasio upon the ' Opera
seria' of the zyth century. He it was who
furnished Bottesini with the Libretto of 'Hero
and Leander,' and Ponchielli with that of
'Gioconda' — both Poems worthy to live for
their own sake. It is much to be able to say
this ; for there are but few Libretti endurable,
in the absence of the Music to which they are
adapted. But Boito's Poems are different indeed
from those which have served as the basis of
most Italian Operas, for many years past. He
is a profound thinker, as well as a learned
scholar ; a Philosopher, as well as a Poet. In
a fourth Libretto, more carefully constructed
than either of the three we have mentioned,
he has given us an Italian illustration of
Goethe's ' Faust.' This famous Libretto he has
himself set to Music. And here we have to
grapple with one of the greatest difficulties with
which the later Schools of Dramatic Music are
called upon to contend. Their demands upon
the individual are excessive. How can one man
shine, in the first rank, as a Poet and a Musician,
a Philosopher and a Machinist, a Maestro di Canto
and a designer of Scenery ? Had Bo'ito studied
Music as he has studied Poetry, 'Mefistofele'
would have been simply immortal. As it is, it
can only give pleasure to those who are incapable
of listening with patience to 'Fidelio* or ' II Don
Giovanni.' We will not stay to analyse its Music.
Suffice it to say that the Libretto has been written
with so clear an insight into Goethe's meaning,
and so conscientious a desire to do justice to his
intention, that it cannot but be regarded as a
valuable commentary upon the Poem. It has
been said that very great Music may sometimes
save a very bad Libretto. It remains to be seen
whether the converse of the proposition te equally
true.
Among the most conscientious adherents to
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
the principles of the new School, we find a num
ber of young Composers, who have already earned
a reputation which bids fair to increase very
rapidly. First among these stands Ponchielli,
whose three best works, ' I promessi Sposi,' ' Gio
conda,' and 'II Figluol prodigo,' exhibit, in their
highest development, the most prominent charac
teristics of the movement. Bottesini, in his ' Hero
and Leander ' and ' La Regina del Nepal, ' inclines
rather to the standard adopted by Verdi, striving
hard to attain dramatic power, but refusing to
betray the cause of Italian Melody. Catalani,
happily for his successful Opera, ' Elda/ pro
duced in 1880, has hitherto chosen the same line
of action, which has been even more fully carried
out by Anteri-Manzocchi, in his really melodious
works ' Dolores' and ' Stella.' Marchetti, on the
other hand, has attached himself to the most ad
vanced section of the party, and, in his 'Buy
Bias ' and ' Don Giovanni d' Austria,' acts as the
champion of its most violent utterances.
Reviewing the School, as a whole, we can
not but see that it must necessarily exercise a
powerful influence upon the Future of Dramatic
Art. It has its weak points, as well as its Strong
ones : and, if it is ever to attain real greatness, its
supporters must dare to look the former resolutely
in the face, and fight with them, hand to hand.
Among the weakest of these weak points are
three which merit more than ordinary attention :
neglect of Melody ; neglect of that indispensable
care for the Voice, and its possibilities, without
which the Opera must eventually degenerate
into a mere vulgar crash of Instrumental inani
ties ; and neglect of that careful system of
Part-writing, which, in the Italian School of
fifty years ago, was less indispensable than it has
since become. A very slight knowledge of the
Theory of Music sufficed for the enrichment of a
graceful Melody with a passable Accompaniment.
But the new School aims at higher things than
this; and study is needed for their attainment.
Hitherto, Part- writing has not been very deeply
studied in Italy. It must be cultivated, now;
or the School must, sooner or later, collapse.
Music has its Grammar as well as Poetry ; and
the rules of the one can no more be neglected
than those of the other. What would the author
of 'Mefistofele' think of an Italian Libretto,
beginning with the words —
Avi Signer delle Angelo ed della Santi?
What, then, must an educated Musician, ac
customed to the Harmonies of Mozart and Bee
thoven, think of such a passage as the following ?
Surely this passage, and a similar one in the
Scene at the beginning of the Prologue of 'Me
fistofele,' must have been written, like the Scherzo
sung by the Cherubim, for fun.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
In strange contrast to these crudities, the news
is brought to us of the discovery of an unfinished
Opera— ' II Duca d'Alba' — by Donizetti. The
authenticity of the MS. has been established,
beyond all doubt; and the possibility of com
pleting and performing the work has already
been discussed. It is to be hoped that the task
of supplying the missing portions will be entrusted
to an Artist capable of thoroughly sympathising
with the intentions of a Composer who never
heard of avvenerismo, and, if he had, could not
have countenanced it ; for, its introduction into
one of his tuneful inspirations would have been
like the introduction of vitriol into the human eye.
Should this point be borne in mind, and should the
Opera prove to be in the Master's best style, it
will come upon us like a Voice from the Dead,
and may do much towards the direction of Italian
taste into a characteristic Italian channel.
XXXIII. THE FRENCH SCHOOL OF THE IQTH
CENTURY is a very important one, for it represents
the 'Grand Ope"ra' in a very interesting phase of
its development, and the 'Opera Comi(j[ue' in the
nearest approach it has made to perfection.
The history of the 'Grand Opera' is remark
able for the long periods of almost unredeemed
sterility interposed between its most brilliant
triumphs. Forty-six years elapsed between the
death of Lulli and the production of Rameau's
' Hippolyte et Aricie' ; ten between the death of
Eameau' and the first performance of Gluck's
' Tphige"nie en Aulide,' and twenty-five between
Gluck's last Opera, 'Echo et Narcisse,' and
Cherubini's ' Anaereon,' produced in 1803.
' Anacreon ' was succeeded, after an interval of
four years, by Spontini's ' La Vestale ' ; and this,
two years later, by the same Composer's ' Ferdi
nand Cortez ' : works which remained deservedly
popular, until the appearance of Rossini's 'Guil-
laume Tell,' in 1829, caused all earlier successes
to be forgotten. It is singular that this beautiful
Composition should alone retain its place upon
the stage, as the permanent representative of a
period which owes more to Cherubim, Spontini,
and Rossini, than to any other Composer, whether
native or foreign ; for even the best productions
of later years, notwithstanding their extraordinary
popularity, will bear no comparison with those of
these three masters, on purely artistic grounds.1
Nevertheless, these later works must not be
lightly esteemed ; nor must the names of the
Masters who produced them be passed over with
out due notice. For many years, Auber and
HaleVy enjoyed an almost exclusive monopoly of
popular favour. The lead was afterwards trans
ferred to Meyerbeer, who, having once obtained
a hearing, suffered no rival to approach him. It
was no small thing for a German Composer,
attracted— like Gluck — at the outset of his career,
by the graces of the Italian School, to settle down
into a style so well adapted to Parisian tastes
that a Librettist, like Scribe, French to the back
bone, should find himself immortalised by the con
nection of his Verses with the stranger's powerful
I8eevol.it. p. 525.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 303
Music. The cosmopolitan spirit that dictated this
vigorous course deserved success, and commanded
it — being based upon a foundation of undeniable
talent. For Meyerbeer's French Operas are no
weak rehabilitations of an effete formula. They
teem with Melodies which, however eccentric in
construction, haunt the ear too effectually to be
easily forgotten. Their grasp of the business
of the Stage, too comprehensive to overlook the
smallest detail, never fails to penetrate the in
most depth of the situation, be it what it may.
And — most important of all, when we remember
the character of the audiences to which they
were originally addressed — they rise, where dra
matic truth demands that they should do so, to
a climax which carries everything before it.
How many Composers could have continued the
Action of the Drama, with increasing interest,
after the fervid passion of ' Robert toi que j'aime'?
Yet 'Robert toi que j'aime' is but an episode
in a powerful Duet, which itself is but a single
member of a still more exciting Finale. How
many, after the ' Blessing of the Poignards,' could
have escaped the chill of a wretched anti-climax ?
Yet it is only after the last crash of Orchestra
and Chorus has been silenced, that the Scene
begins to work up to its true culminating-point,
in the Duet which concludes the Act. Truly
these are master-strokes : and the Composer who
imagined them deserves to live.
Meyerbeer's legitimate successor is Gounod,
a genius of a very different order, but of no
mean capability. Like Meyerbeer, he has listened
to the counsels of Gluck, and profited by them
largely; though, no doubt, in many cases, un
consciously. But, this remark applies only to
the theoretical principles by which his practice
is guided. In the details of his work, he has
taken counsel from no one. His style is essen
tially his own ; and, if it be tinged, sometimes,
with a shade of mannerism, the peculiarity is
only just strong enough to enable us to recognise
our author with pleasure. It is impossible to
mistake the tone of his harmonic colouring. Even
when he writes progressions which bear not the
most distant resemblance to each other, we
constantly find him using the Chords he most
delights in, for the production of certain sensuous
effects, certain shades of pathetic expression,
which distinguish his Music so plainly that
it cannot be misunderstood. The dramatic
power exhibited in ' Faust ' is very striking ;
and much of its Music is quite good enough to
live, apart from the Stage — a quality growing
daily more and more rare, and regarded, by
advanced thinkers, as a sign of weakness, though
it is difficult to understand why really good
Music should not sound good, anywhere. At any
rate, Gounod's inspirations are always welcome,
either in the Theatre, or the Concert Room ;
whether from 'Faust,' or ' Mireille,' or 'La
Nonne Sanglante,' or other Operas less known
here : and though ' Faust ' is the work on which
his fame chiefly rests, he has done so much, in
other ways, that we cannot believe he will re
main contented with the laurels he has already
304 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
won. The difficulty of winning such laurels, on a
Stage which has witnessed so many shipwrecks,
is no slight one. Ambroise Thomas had suc
ceeded, over and over again, in lighter pieces,
before he established his reputation by the pro
duction of 'Hamlet'; and the 'chute Iclatante' of
Berlioz's ' Benvenuto Cellini,' meant nothing less
than ruin. But we have not yet seen the last of
the traditional ' Grand Ope'ra/
The 'Ope'ra Comique,' still more prosperous,
in some respects, than its graver sister at the
' Academic,' was raised to a high aesthetic level
by Boieldieu, Gre"try, and Me'hul, at a very early
period ; and, even before the ipth century began,
had given fair promise of a brilliant future,
destined to be speedily realised by the genius
of Cherubim, whose ' Lodoiska,' ' Elise,' 'Mede"e,'
' Faniska,' and, above all, ' Les deux Journeys, '
rise far above his best contributions to the r6-
pertoire of the ' Grand Ope'ra.' In these great
works, the triumphs of this form of the Lyric
Drama culminate. No one has attempted to
compete with their author, in his own style ;
and no new style has been conceived worthy to
be discussed in connection with it.1 The train
of thought pursued by He'rold, Auber, and their
countless followers, led them in so different a
direction, that one is tempted to wish some more
appropriate name had been invented, to distin
guish their respective styles, and thus prevent
the appearance of an unfair comparison of works
which bear no nearer relation to each other
than the Tragedy bears to the Ballad. Never
theless, the number of successes achieved, of late
years, in the lighter style, is very great. Six
years ago, the hopes of French Musicians were
excited by the production of Bizet's 'Carmen';
than which no work of similar character could
possibly have been more exactly adapted to the
one great need of the present crisis — the support,
and continuation, of a long-established School.
Pleasing enough to attract, yet not sufficiently
so to stifle the memory of standard successes ;
original enough to command attention, yet not so
new as to suggest the birth of a newer School ;
it takes its place among the best productions
of its class, and honourably maintains it, with
out disturbing the relations of existing styles.
A School in Music bears a very close analogy
to a Species in Zoology. Its line of demarcation
is a very elastic one. Countless modifications of
form may be introduced without transgressing
its limits. But, there is a point which cannot
be overstepped. We have seen that Wagner
has placed himself beyond the pale of the
Komantic School ; and Bo'ito, beyond that of the
Italian School of Melody. Bizet has thought for
himself ; but has not overstepped the boundaries
of the ' Ope'ra Comique.' With sufficient char
acter to stamp them as his own, his ideas
evince sufficient originality to entitle them to
consideration, as belonging to a School already
formed. His power of expressing passion is very
remarkable : not Italian passion ; but the agita-
i Bee vol. li. pp. 522, 523.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
tion which goads a soul to madness. And the
quaint piquancy of some of his lighter conceptions
is delightfully refreshing ; as in the Chorus of
Gamins, in the First Act — a jeu d'esprit which
makes us long to know how he would have
treated such a character as Petit Gavroche, had
it fallen in his way. But, alas ! like Goetz, he
lived only just long enough to see his talent
appreciated.
Notwithstanding the associations connected
with its title, it is by no means de rigueur that
the subject of the ' Ope'ra comique ' should be a
ludicrous, or even a cheerful one : but, this in
dulgence is not extended to the lighter form of
entertainment called the ' Ope'ra bouffe,' now so
extravagantly popular in Paris, and so frequently
presented, elsewhere, in the guise of an English
or German translation. In general design, the
'Ope'ra bouffe' bears much the same relation to
the Farce, that the ' Ope'ra comique' bears to
legitimate Comedy ; but it also borrows largely
from the Ballet and the Melodrama, and not a
little from the Extravaganza and Burlesque. Its
Music is, as a general rule, too trivial for serious
criticism ; though, within the last few years,
much of it has attained almost unexampled popu
larity in the hands of Offenbach, Hervd, Lecocq,
and other aspirants for public favour.
Though the French School has produced in
numerable Instrumentalists, of European reputa
tion, it has given birth to comparatively few
Instrumental Composers. It is true, that the
Orchestral Preludes to Cherubini's Operas rank
among the finest inspirations of his genius ; but,
they stand almost alone. Neither the Quartet
nor the Sonata have ever found a congenial
home in France ; nor can the Symphony be said
to have firmly taken root in that country, though
the meteor-like genius of Berlioz invested it, for
a moment, with a passing interest of altogether
exceptional character. The style of this irre
pressible free-lance differs, root and branch,
from that of every other known Composer, Ger
man, French, English, or Italian; yet its most
salient features may be summed up in a very
few words. It is a French paraphrase of the
most pronounced development of the German
Romantic School : German, in its deep cogita
tion, its philosophical moods, its wild imagery,
its power of Tone-painting, and its new and
finished system of Instrumentation — French, in
its violent outbursts, its fervid excitement, its
uncontrollable agitation, its polished refinement,
and, above all, its ineffable Mzarreries. Its
analogue, in Literature, would be a paraphrase
of 'Faust,' by Victor Hugo. It exceeds all
previous revolutionary manifestations, in its mad
contempt for all authority, save that dictated by
its own caprice. In the fearlessness of its concep
tions, it stands unrivalled. And, in painting its
vivid pictures, it avails itself at one moment of
the deepest Poetry, and at another of the grossest
Realism, with a calm assurance which sets all
sober criticism at defiance, but seldom fails to
hit its mark. Are we not made to feel, instinc
tively, in ' Le Carnaval Remain,' that the shower
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
of confetti is a sham? that the bon-t>ons are fic
titious, and probably aimed at our eyes? Can
the coldest of us listen, unmoved, to the March
in 'La Damnation de Faust' ? In ' Harold en
Italie,' the finest picture of all, does not the
Viola obUigata impersonate the hero of the
Poem, as he could have been impersonated by no
other means ? Could we obtain a clearer insight
into his morbid train of thought, if we were per
mitted to converse with him in the flesh ? It has
been said, that genius, capable of producing such
works as these, would expire if trammelled by
the conventional Rules of Art. We do not believe
it. We believe, that, if Berlioz had worked at
those Eules, as hard as Beethoven did, he might
have taken rank among the greatest writers of
the century. Casting them aside, he shines forth
as the producer of works which may astonish,
and even delight, for the moment, but which can
not last, because, like the caprices of the author
himself, they can never be thoroughly understood.
Another bright ornament of the Modern
French School, Camille Saint Saens, has also
given much attention to this particular branch
of Art ; though it is not generally in his purely
descriptive Music that he shows himself at his
best. For instance, his Pianoforte Concerto in
Eb — which, notwithstanding its charmingly pic
turesque character, claims no connection what
ever with the Romantic School — strikes out an
idea, so original, so reasonable, and so full of
artistic interest, that one cannot but regard it
as marking a distinct stage of progress in the
development of Instrumental Composition. Its
grasp of the mutual relations existing between
the Solo Instrument and the Orchestra, its exact
measurement of the capabilities of both, and its
skilful adaptation of the one to the other, unite
in producing a variety of effect, which is height
ened every moment by the introduction of some
new and unexpected combination ; while the
richness of the general tone is not a little
enhanced by the excellence of the ' writing,'
throughout. Saint Sae'ns has written many other
works on a scale as extended as this, and rarely
failed to strike out some original idea well worth
remembering ; but this Concerto carries out a
principle so valuable, that we cannot doubt that
it will take its place among the accepted truths
of Art. On the other hand, the meaning of his
descriptive works is often very obscure. For in
stance, his Poeme Symphonique, 'Le Rouet
d'Omphale,' is lamentably deficient in the clear
ness which is indispensable in a work of the ad
vanced Romantic School. Even with prefatorial
references to guide us to the exact bars in which
we are to look for 'Hercules groaning under
the bonds which he cannot break," and ' Om-
phale deriding his efforts,' we fail to recognise the
true moral of the Scene ; while the passage for
Stringed Instruments which represents the mo
tion of the Wheel, is, after all, no more than
the repetition of an idea already worked out to
perfection in the First Movement of Spohr's
' Weihe^der Tone.' But, if the Composer has mis
taken his strong point in this, he has announced
VOL. in. PT. 3.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 305
it so forcibly in other works, that French or
chestral Composers must be apathetic indeed if
they do not follow his example, in striving to
secure some share of the fame which has hitherto
been exclusively reserved, in Paris, for writers
of Dramatic Music.
XXXIV. THE ENGLISH SCHOOLS OP THE ipxn
CENTURY have passed through so many, and such
various transitions, that it would be impossible to
give a mere general sketch of their history.
They must be treated in detail, or not at all.
We have seen that the death of Handel was
followed by a long period of comparative inaction,
relieved only by the introduction of a new
School of Dramatic Music, essentially English in
character, and, though overflowing with Melody,
sadly deficient in scenic power. This School did
not die out with the i8th century, but was carried
well into the iQth, by Dibdin and Shield ; and in
the hands of Braham, C. E. Horn, and Bishop,
became even more popular than before. Braham,
indeed, did little for it, beyond the introduction
of some spirited Songs, to which his matchless
Voice, and perfect method of phrasing, lent a
charm which atoned for much weak Instrumenta
tion, and many still more serious shortcomings.
But Bishop was a thorough Musician, a perfect
master of the Orchestra, and, in many respects, a
true genius. His invention was unlimited. His
Melodies were always graceful, and pleasing;
and his Concerted Pieces were skilfully put to
gether, with that instinctive tact, which never
fails to produce the best effect attainable with
the means at its command. Witness that de
lightful Finale in 'Guy Mannering,' in which
the Comic and the Sentimental are blended to
gether, with such exquisite perception, that one
can only wonder how the Composer failed to take
rank as the greatest dramatic writer of the period.
Rooke followed, worthily, with ' Amilie, or The
Love-test,' 'Henrique, or The Love-pilgrim, 'and
'Cagliostro' — works full of merit, though no
more likely to be revived than their prede
cessors. If then, even when reinforced by such
exceptional talent, the old English Opera rose to
no satisfactory artistic level, it must clearly have
been in consequence of some radical defect in its
constitution. And this was the exact truth. It
demanded, for its effective representation, a prac
tical impossibility. Due justice could only be
rendered to the impersonation of its principal
characters, by a company of performers, equally
accomplished as Vocalists and Rhetoricians.
And hence it was, that, when ' Guy Mannering'
was revived, some five and thirty years ago, at the
Princess's Theatre, the piece owed its success en
tirely to the wonderful delineation of the parts of
Meg Merrilies and Dominie Sampson by two cele
brated Comedians, neither of whom could sing a
single note — in other words, it succeeded, not as
an Opera, but as a Play. Neither in Germany
nor France, would this perversion of styles have
been possible : for, neither in the modern form of
the 'Singspiel,' nor in the ' OpeYa comique,' is any
really important part of the Action of the Drama
transacted in spoken Dialogue. The approach of
306 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
a scenic climax is always heralded by a return to
the more powerful language of Music ; and it
was simply to the neglect of this condition that
the older School of English Opera owed its ruin.
A foolish prejudice against English Recitative
had long been prevalent in musical circles ; and
had, by this time, become so general, that when
' Der Freischiitz ' was produced at Covent Garden
in 1824, it was mutilated in the most shame
less manner to meet the popular taste, the last
grand Finale being represented solely by its con
cluding Chorus. Even the Libretto of' Oberon'
(by Planche") contained scenes in which the whole
interest was centred in the Dialogue ; and, when
German, Italian, or French Operas, were 'adapted
to the English Stage,' their finest movements were
excised, in obedience to this Procrustean law.
What wonder that a School based on so false a
foundation should fall to the ground !
Without one tithe of Bishop's talent, or a
vestige of his reverence for Art, Balfe saw
this weak point ; and remedied it, by substi
tuting Music for Dialogue, in the more impor
tant situations of the Drama, and thus assimi
lating it more nearly to the lighter phases of the
' Ope'ra comique.' In this he certainly did well.
Compared with Bishop's, his Music was worth
less. But, by introducing it in the right places,
he saved the English Opera — a work in which
he was ably supported by Benedict, whose earlier
Operas were based upon similar views. Wallace
followed with ' Maritana' and ' Lurline' ; Lucas,
with 'The Regicide'; Lavenu, with 'Loretta';
Howard Glover, with ' Ruy Bias,' 'Aminta,'
' Once too often,' and ' The Coquette ' ; Henry
Smart with 'The Gnome of Harzburg' ; Hatton,
with 'Pascal Bruno' — produced at Vienna — and
'Rose, or Love's Ransom' ; Mellon, with 'Vic-
torine ' ; and Edward Loder, with ' The Night-
Dancers.' Our best Composers were, by this time,
fully convinced, that, if any good was to be effected
for the English Lyric Drama, it could only be
by the full recognition of principles, which, ages
before, had been received as canons of Art in every
other country in Europe. The performances of a
German Opera Company, in London, in 1840-
1842, did much towards the illustration of these
principles, in a form both practical and instructive.
The German 'Singspiel' was heard, in its normal
purity, interpreted by German Singers of highest
rank. The objectors to English Recitative were
put out of Court ; for the Dialogue of the
' Singspiel ' is spoken. We know, now, that this
is a mistake ; and, that the only true principle
is that maintained by the Italians, who insist
that everything must be sung, or nothing. But,
in those days, it was a great thing that even
the German theory should be accepted ; and its
acceptance was followed by great results.
The eyes of John Barnett had already been
opened to the necessity of this modification of
form, as early as 1834, when he brought out his
best Opera, 'The Mountain Sylph,'at the Lyceum.
Before this, he had produced a lengthy series of
dramatic works, abounding in beautiful Songs,
but based upon the approved English model, and
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
therefore doomed to speedy extinction. But in
'The Mountain Sylph' he proved himself the
possessor of an unsuspected amount of dramatic
power ; and, while faithful to his melodic talent,
took care to employ it — as in the clever Trio,
'This magic- wove scarf — in combination with
sufficient Action to ensure its good effect. But,
though the Opera proved a great success, the
new principle was not followed up, until, after
the arrival of the German Company, English
audiences became alive to its immense import
ance. Then it was that George Macfarren ap
peared upon the scene, with his ' Don Quixote';
a delightful work, which was received at Drury
Lane in 1846 with acclamation. No less suc
cessful were his ' Charles the Second,' produced
at the Princess's Theatre in 1849, and ' Robin
Hood,' at 'Her Majesty's Theatre' in 1860.
These, and some later works of similar tendency,
are all written in true English style ; but with
an honest appreciation of the form which pre
vailed uninterruptedly in Germany, from the
time of Mozart until the first outbreak of the
revolution which has condemned it as a relique
of the dark ages. With this revolution, Macfarren
has never shown the slightest sympathy, either in
theory or practice : but, honestly striving to carry
out the principles which underlie ' Der Freischiitz,'
' Die Entfiihrung,' and ' Les deux Journe"es,' he
has accomplished a work which may possibly be
more fully appreciated after a certain inevitable
reaction has set in, than it is now.
Not many English Operas of note have been
produced in London since Macfarren's later
works ; but within the last few years a taste
has been developed for a lighter kind of Operetta,
the success of which has surpassed anything thai
the most devoted admirers of playful Music could
have anticipated. In nothing does a true Artist
declare himself more unmistakeably, than in his
power of adapting himself to circumstances. We
all know that Opera buffa is a lower form of Art
than Opera seria; yet Cimarosa and; Rossini
achieved some success in it, to say nothing of
Mozart. In like manner, though we do not say
that English Comic Operetta is, in itself, a noble
conception, we do say, that, since the English
public is determined to have it, Arthur Sullivan
has proved himself a true Artist, by meeting the
demand in so conscientious a spirit that his re
putation as a Musician will rest, eventually, on
his Operettas, as much as on his more serious
Compositions. A strong affinity may be traced
between these pretty trifles, and the older forms
of Italian Opera buffa. The Tunes are catching,
in the highest degree. If they were not so,
no Operetta would live a week. But, they
are also put together with so much genuine
Musician-like feeling, that, though they may be
ground on the barrel-organ, and whistled in the
street, they can never sound vulgar. And, the
brightest fun of the piece, the real vis comica,
lies — as in 'H Barbie re,' and ' La Cenerentola'
—not in the words, but in the Music. ' Hardly
ever' would not have passed into a proverb, if
it had been spoken. It makes us laugh, only
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
because, like all the other good things in ' H. M. S.
Pinafore,' it is so set to Music that the Singer
has no choice but to turn it into fun. And
it is exactly the same with 'Patience,' and
' Cox and Box.' Their Music overflows with
witty passages ; passages which would make the
words sound witty, were they ever so tame.
The fun of very clever people is always the
richest fun of all. Its refinement is a thousand
times more telling than the coarser utterances of
ordinary humour. And so it has always been
with the greatest Masters of Opera buffa. Paisi-
ello and Cimarosa are accepted as Classical Com
posers; yet their sprightliness exceeds that of
all the farce-writers that ever existed. Arthur
Sullivan has made every one in London laugh ;
yet, the predominating quality in the Music of
' H.M.S. Pinafore ' is reverence for Art — con
scientious observance of its laws, in little things.
It may sound absurd to say so : but, no one
who takes the trouble to examine the Score can
deny the fact-
It is said that the Composer of these popular
Operettas is contemplating a Serious Opera,
planned upon an extensive scale. It is to be
hoped that the report may prove true ; for,
with his great reputation, he can hardly fail to
obtain a hearing, though there is not much hope,
in England, for aspirants of lesser celebrity. That
Stanford's ' Veiled Prophet ' should have been
performed, for the first time, at Hanover, in
the form of a German translation, is a reproach
to our national taste. Had the work proceeded
from an untried hand, managers might have been
forgiven for refusing to risk the production of a
piece demanding such costly scenic preparation.
But Stanford's name was not unknown; and
'The Veiled Prophet' proved to be something
better than a poor commonplace imitation of
foreign models. Though original, in the best sense
of the word, ifc never descends to eccentricity.
While giving free expression to any amount of
necessary dramatic colouring, the Composer never
forgets that there is another side to the question
— that even dramatic colouring must conform to
laws which have been ordained in order that Art
may never degrade herself by the presentation of
that which is hideous, or even unlovely. This
wholesome restraint is exemplified, in a very re
markable way, in the Music allotted to Mokanna.
The temptation to represent physical ugliness by
ugly progressions would have been too strong for
many a young Composer to resist ; yet, here, with
no suspicion of such revolting symbolism, we are
still made to realise the horror of the Scene in its
fullest significance. There is a determined cha
racter about the Watchman's Song which stamps
it, throughout, as an original inspiration. The
same may be said of the Music designed to
accompany the rising of the magic moon ; while
the more regularly developed Movements — such
as the Duet between Zelica and Azim, in the
Second Act — show evidence of a preconceived
design, which greatly augments the musical in
terest of the piece. Judged as a whole, the Opera
takes rank as a legitimate product of theKomantic
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 307
School, original enough to claim our hearty re
cognition, on its own merits, yet obedient enough
to scholastic law to show that its author has not
neglected the study of classical models.
Want of space compels us to pass over the
Dramatic Works of Cowen, and Alfred Cellier,
and many another rising Artist, without detailed
notice ; but, with so many young Composers in
the full strength of their artistic life, and so many
clever librettists ready to cast in their lot with
them, we cannot but think that there is good
hope for the future of English Opera.
During the earlier decads of the ipth century,
England did but little for Sacred Music. In one
important point, however, she was faithful to
tradition. She alone kept alive that love for
Handel which was elsewhere absolutely extinct.
The Csecilian Society, and, after it, the Sacred
Harmonic Society, did more good than could have
been achieved by any number of lukewarm Com
posers. It is not too much to say that some of the
finest Music we possess must have been delivered
over to oblivion, had it not been kept before the
world by these two Associations, until its beauties
were recognised elsewhere, and Germany began
that splendid edition of Handel's works, which
ought, years ago. to have been printed in London.
All honour to Dr. Chrysander for his labour of
love ! But we must not forget that the English
were the first to promote, in one way, the work
which Germany is now promoting in another ; for
it is to the enterprise of London publishers that
we owe those octavo editions of Handel's Ora
torios, the cheapness of which places them in
the hands of every one, while their enormous
circulation shows how wonderfully the taste for
good Music must be on the increase. Moreover,
the weakness, which, fifty or sixty years ago,
lowered the tone of English Sacred Music so
deplorably, has given place to a more promising
power of healthy production. There can be no
doubt that this reaction is mainly traceable to the
first performance, in 1846, of Mendelssohn's
' Elijah,' an event which impressed the British
public with a deeper reverence for the higher
branches of Art than it had previously enter
tained. The audiences assembling at Exeter
Hall knew some dozen Oratorios — the finest in
the world — and honestly appreciated them. But,
they did not care to hear anything they did not
know. They were afraid to pass judgment on
Music with which they were not familiar, lest,
by criticising it too favourably, they should com
promise their taste. The appearance of ' Elijah'
put an end to this unsatisfactory state of things.
The Oratorio proved to be superb ; and no one
was afraid to acknowledge it. The reaction was
complete. The eyes of a large section of the
Musical public were opened ; and many who had
never before entertained the idea of such a ques
tion, began to ask whether the creative faculty
might not still be found within the pale of the
English School. It was found; and, one by one,
works were produced, quite strong enough to
give fair promise of the ultimate formation of a
new School of English Oratorio. To Sterndale
X2
308 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Bennett we owe ' The Woman of Samaria ' ; to
C.E.Horsley, 'David,' 'Joseph,' and 'Gideon'; to
Macfarren, ' S. John the Baptist, ' ' The Resurrec
tion,' and 'Joseph'; to Benedict, 'Saint Csecilia'
and ' S.Peter'; to Ouseley, 'Saint Polycarp ' and
'Hagar ' ; to Sullivan, ' The Prodigal Son' and
' The Light of the World' ; to John Francis Bar-
nett, ' The Raising of Lazarus ' ; to Bexfield,
' Israel restored' ; to Chipp, ' Job ' and ' Naomi';
to Dearie, ' Israel in the Wilderness ' ; to Costa,
'Eli' and 'Naaman'; to Henry Leslie, 'Im-
manuel ' and 'Judith ' ; to Barnby, ' Rebekah ' ;
to Joseph Parry, ' Emanuel ' ; to Bridge, « Mount
Moriah ' ; to Armes, ' Saint John the Evangelist';
to Pierson, 'Jerusalem,' and the unfinished Ora
torio 'Hezekiah.' Were we to speak of these
works, or any of them, as on a level with ' Saint
Paul,' or ' Elijah,' their Composers would be the
first to contradict us. But we do say, that, with
such a list before us — a list far from complete-
it would be absurd to speak of the English Ora
torio ;is extinct.
In order to supply a pressing need at our
Provincial Musical Festivals, the Oratorio has
been supplemented, of late years, by the Choral
Cantata, in which some of our best English Com
posers have attained considerable success. Among
the best examples produced within the last thirty
years, we may mention Dr. Stainer's ' Daughter
of Jairus'; Caldicott's 'Widow of Nam'; Dr.
Bridge's 'Boadicea'; Macfarren's 'Lenora,' 'May
Day,' ' The Sleeper awakened/ ' Christmas,' and
'The Lady of the Lake'; Sterndale Bennett's
'May Queen'; Benedict's 'Undine' and 'Richard
Cceur de Lion' ; John Francis Barnett's 'Paradise
and the Peri/ 'The Ancient Mariner/ and ' The
Building of the Ship' ; Hodson's' Golden Legend ';
Hubert Parry's 'Prometheus Unbound' ; Cowen's
' Corsair/ ' S. Ursula,' and ' The Rose Maiden';
Madame Sain ton-Dolby's ' Legend of Saint Doro
thea/ 'The Story of the Faithful Soul/ and
' Thalassa ' ; Gadsby's 'Alcestis/ and ' The Lord
of the Isles'; Prout's 'Here ward'; Leslie's
'Holyrood/ and 'The Daughter of the Isles';
H. Smart's ' Jacob/ ' Bride of Dunkerron/ ' King
Renews daughter,' and 'The Fisher Maidens';
Mackenzie's 'The Bride' ; Sullivan's 'Kenilworth'
and ' Martyr of Antioch'; and many others.
The extraordinary number of these ambitious
works may be partly explained by the increasing
zeal for the cultivation of Part-Singing mani
fested by all classes of English Society. Forty
years ago, the Art was scarcely known beyond
the limits of the Sacred Harmonic Society, and
the Choirs assembling at the greater Provincial
Festivals. But, in 1840, Mr. Hullah — already
well known to the public by his ' Village Co
quettes ' and some other Operas — first set on foot
the famous Classes, which, beginning at the
Training College at Battersea, have since spread
to the remotest parts of the country ; insomuch
that there are lew parishes in England, which
have not, at some time or other, boasted a Class
on the 'Hullah System/ and few towns destitute
of a respectable ' Choral Society.' So great was
the success of the movement, that, aided by his
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
friend, E. C. May, and other coadjutors, Mr.
Hullah was able, within a very few years, to
raise the system of training to a standard much
higher than that which he had originally contem
plated ; and, drafting his best pupils into a more
advanced Choir, to perform the Oratorios of
Handel, and other great works, first at Exeter
Hall, and then at S. Martin's, in a style which
did honour to the Association, even in the face of
the Sacred Harmonic Society. The effect of
these energetic proceedings was to educate, not
only the taste, but the Voices of the people, also,
to a point which prepared the way for the Choirs
founded by Leslie, Barnby, and others, for
smaller gatherings, for the Gluck Society, and
for the now firmly established Bach Chuir, which,
under the able direction of Otto Goldschmidt,
with Madame Lind- Goldschmidt consenting,
from pure love of Art, to lead its Sopranos, has
achieved its well-known success in the inter
pretation of choral works of the highest order.
Moreover, this increased and increasing love for
Choral Singing has already led to the produc
tion of countless Anthems, Services, and other
pieces of Choral Music, many of which are in
favour with our Church Choirs.
During the first half of the I9th century In
strumental Music was chiefly rep resented, in Eng
land, by Clementi, John Field, John Cramer, the
elder Wesley, Dr. Crotch, Thos. Attwood, G. E.
Griffin, and B. Jacob. To these succeeded Mo-
scheles and Cipriani Potter ; after whose retirement
a newer style was developed, under the leadership
of Sterndale Bennett. He first showed us how,
to the refined technique of his predecessors, a new
grace might be added more captivating than all
the rest : and, crystallising this, in his written
works, he has breathed a spirit into English
Music which will not be soon forgotten. It is
not too much to say, that, in perfection of form,
clearness of design, symmetry of proportion,
and delicacy of detail, his style has never been
rivalled, since the death of Mendelssohn. These
four great qualities — especially the last — distin
guish it from all contemporary methods. And
these qualities served him, even before he
left the Royal Academy, as a fortress, under
shelter of which he might safely give free scope
to his genius, in any desired direction. Pro
tected by this, lie fearlessly suffered his Fancy to
lead him into the very heart of the Romantic
School. Not towards the spectre-haunted region so
familiar to Weber and Marschner, but into the
bright realm of Nymphs, and Sprites, and Faeries,
and all the beautiful creatures of the woods ; the
dwellers in lonely streams; the dancers in the
moonlit meadow ; ethereal essences which he
knew how to paint in colours as bright and beau
tiful as themselves. Where Weber shows us a
Dragon, Bennett points to the gambols of a
Squirrel; but it is only just to say that we are
made to see the one picture as clearly as the
other. Still, Bennett was no realist. He painted
Ms pictures with an exactness of definition which
compels our instant recognition ; but, he dealt
with the Unseen, as well as with the Seen, and
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
thus affiliated himself to the Imaginative School
as closely as to her Eomantic sister. There are
thoughts in his Concertos, in the Symphony in
G Minor, and in many of his pieces of Chamber
Music, which neither words, nor pictures, can
communicate from mind to mind ; thoughts which
can only be rendered intelligible through the
medium of Music, and which, so communicated,
unite the inmost soul of the hearer with that of
the Composer.1 No doubt, this is the highest
result that Music can hope to reach — certainly,
the most intellectual. But, this view of the case
detracts nothing, either from the merit, or the
charm, of Romantic pictures, so delicately painted
as the Overtures to 'The Naiads,' 'The Wood-
nymphs,' 'Paradise and the Peri,' or 'Parisina' —
in which last sad inspiration the deepest depths
of Tragedy are reached as certainly as the per
fection of beauty is reached in the others. The
' Three Musical Sketches ' stand forth like three
little Water Colour Drawings from the pencil of
Turner, who himself could have thrown no more
poetical expression into the calm ripple on 'The
Lake,' the rush of 'The Mill-stream,' or the
brilliant sparkle of ' The Fountain,' than Bennett
has done by means of the simplest possible form
of Tone-Painting. Yet, even from these, the
taint of vulgar realism is entirely excluded. The
only satisfactory test that can be applied, in such
cases, is the question, ' Would the Music sound
good, and beautiful, and interesting, to a man
who had never seen, or heard of, a Lake, a Mill-
stream, or a Fountain ?' And there can be only
one answer — of course it would. Bennett never
once, during the whole course of his artistic life,
descended to anything that was beneath the
dignity of his Art. One may read noblesse oblige
in every bar he ever wrote. And we, who knew
him intimately, can confidently assert, that,
though his whole heart was full of gentleness,
the kindness of his disposition never tempted him
to condone, in others, what he would himself
have rejected as unworthy of an Artist. On the
other hand, if he could not tolerate bad Part-
writing, or vicious Harmony, or hideous malform
ation disguised under the title of freedom from
archaic bondage, he never refused to do justice
to a grand idea, because it was new. Indeed, so
far removed was his loyal Conservatism from the
blindness which can see no good in anything not
yet consecrated by the lapse of time, that he him
self was always ready to welcome new ideas;
and to deal with them in such sort, that, in
many respects, his Music was very much in ad
vance of its age.
Under such a leader, it would have been
shameful if the English School had produced no
Instrumental Music. It has produced much.
Macfarren's Overtures to 'Chevy Chase,' 'The
Merchant of Venice,' 'Romeo and Juliet,' 'Ham
let,' and 'Don Carlos'; John Francis Barnett's
'Symphony in A Minor,' 'Overture Symphon-
ique,1 Overture to ' A Winter's Tale,' and ' Con
certo in D minor'; Stanford's Symphonies, his
i See Mendelssohn's Letter to Souchay, Oct. 15. 1842.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 309
Sonata for Pianoforte and Violin, in D (op. n),
his Violoncello Sonata, in A (op. 9), and his other
pieces for the Chamber, are all works worthy of
recognition. Best's Organ Music, even apart
from its Musician-like construction, and pure
artistic feeling, shows an intimate acquaintance
with the character and capabilities of the In
strument, which cannot but secure for it a long
term of favour. Meanwhile, we owe much to a
large and daily increasing class of Organists,
once led by Drs. Gauntlett and S. S. Wesley, and
now well represented by E. J. Hopkins, W. Rea,
Drs. Stainer, Bridge, Gladstone, and many ta
lented associates, whose executive power, and
knowledge of practical Organ-building, have, for
many years past, reacted upon each other, pro
ducing, in the end, a School of Organ-playing,
the excellence of which is not surpassed in any
part of Europe*
Arthur Sullivan, who has done so much for
the lighter forms of Opera, and for Vocal Music
of almost every class, has not been idle with re
gard to Instrumental Music, but has produced
works — such as his Music in ' The Tempest5 and
the ' Merchant of Venice,' his Symphony in E, his
Overtures ' di Ballo,' and ' In Metnoriam,' — which
show that, if he would, he might rival any one
in this department of the art. His treatment of
the Orchestra shows an intimate acquaintance
with the nature of its Instruments, and a genius
for their combination, such as few contemporary
masters have surpassed ; and we sincerely trust
that the success of no possible number of Operettas
may prevent him from continuing to labour in
the more serious field in which he has already
won so many honours.
Frederick Cowen is also worthily supplement
ing his Choral works, and his early and success
ful Opera, 'Pauline,' by numerous Instrumental
Compositions, some of which have received marks
of special favour at the Philharmonic Society
and elsewhere. Among the most important of
these are his 3 Symphonies, his Sinfonietta, and
his Orchestral Suite — a series of significant pro
ductions, though not all of equal pretension. In
close sympathy with the modern system of Tone-
painting, Cowen delights in connecting his work
by a thread of Romance, which, weaving itself
through the entire sequence of Movements,
gives a clue to the intention of the whole : but,
with a wholesome dread of realism, he usually
leaves his audience to fill in the details of the
picture for themselves. For instance, in his
Orchestral Suite, ' The Language of Flowers' —
where distinct imitation of Nature, if not im
possible, would have bordered upon the ludicrous
—poetical symbolism is used, with excellent and
perfectly intelligible effect. The Scandinavian.
Symphony (No. 3, in C minor), though confess
edly a more descriptive work, owes more to the
effect of subtle suggestion than to the presenta
tion of a definite picture. It is true that we are
introduced, in the Slow Movement, to a merry
boating-party ; and, in the Scherzo, to the in
cidents of a sleigh journey : but, in the opening
Allegro, we are invited to contemplate the sombre
310 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
scenery of the North, and, in the Finale, to dream
of its heroic Legends, with no assistance from
the Composer beyond the suggestion of a fitting
frame of mind, which we cannot mistake, but
which, nevertheless, leaves our fancy unfettered.
It is by this fixity of intention, rather than by
any more material quality, that we must measure
the true value of Cowen's works, which, already
very numerous, will, we trust, continue to mul
tiply and advance.1
Hubert Parry, pursuing the path least likely to
lead to evanescent popularity, has published a
Pianoforte Trio in E minor, some Sonatas2 full of
earnest thought, and a Grand Duo for two Piano
fortes, in which the twin Instruments are made
to ' play up to each other ' by means of a very
much greater amount of ingenious Part-writing
than one generally expects to find in Composi
tions of this class, while the well-marked character
of the Subjects employed enhances its interest as a
contribution to our store of advanced Pianoforte
Music. He has also written an Overture, a Piano
forte Concerto, and other pieces, which, though
several times performed in London, remain still
in MS.
Of the works of Henry Smart, Walter Macfar-
ren, Hatton, GOBS, Ouseley, Leslie — whose Sym
phony in D, entitled ' Chivalry,' has lately been
successfully performed — and a score of other
Composers of the day, we would gladly speak in
detail did our space permit. Our object, how
ever, is not to call attention to the productions
of individual writers, however excellent and in
teresting they may be in themselves; but, to
show, by reference to actual facts, the present
position of our English School, as compared with
the Schools of other countries. We have proved
that its descent is as'pure as that of any School
in Europe : that we can trace back its pedigree,
link by link, from its living representatives,
through Sterndale Bennett, Horn, Bishop, Dib-
din, Arne, Boyce, Purcell, and the School of the
Restoration, to the Polyphonic Composers, Gib
bons, Tallis, Byrd, Whyte, Tye, Edwardes, Fayr-
fax, and John of Dunstable, and back, through
these, to the oldest Composer of whom the world
has any record, that John of Fornsete to whom
we owe the most antient example of Polyphonic
Composition yet discovered. We have shown—
and shall presently show more plainly still — that,
at the present moment, it is more active than
it has ever been before ; doing excellent work ;
and giving rich promise for the future. There
has never been a time at which English Com
posers have more faithfully fulfilled the trust
committed to them than now. They have con
ducted us, step by step, to- a very high position
indeed. We shall be cowards, if we recede from
it. In order to prevent such a disaster, we have
only to bear the work of our forefathers in mind ;
and, so long as this is healthily remembered, we
need entertain but little dread of retrogression.
XXX Y. Is retrogression then possible, in
THE SCHOOLS OF THE FUTUEE, after the wonderful
advances that have already been made ?
i For list, see vol. i. p. 413. 2 For list, see vol. ii. p. 651.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Undoubtedly it is. By hard work, and con
tinued perseverance, we may postpone its advent
to an indefinite date. But, sooner or later, it
will certainly come upon us. If the History of
Art prove nothing else, it most certainly will
never cease to prove this, to the end of time :
and we have written to small purpose, if we
have failed to establish the fact. After more
than two centuries of steady progress, Polyphony
attained perfection, in the School of Palestrina;
and, within fifty years after his death, became a
thing of the past. In the fourth half-century of
its existence, the Monodic School received, at the
hands of Rossini, so notable an infusion of German
power, that, in its later phases, its essential prin
ciples, scarcely less dead than those of Polyphony,
are barely recognisable. Not only have the Poly-
odic Schools of Handel and Bach languished, for
lack of disciples ; but it is even doubtful whether
any Composer of the present day would care to
make common cause with them, if he could.
The same thing has happened in the case of
every direct manifestation of a special form of
Art. Is the School of Beethoven — which has
served, more or less, as the basis of all the best
work done during the last fifty years — condemned
to suffer with the rest ? It must so suffer, or
contradict the experience of all past history. The
question is, not whether it is doomed to extinc
tion — for of that we are firmly assured — but,
whether it has already reached its culminating
point. Is room still left for greater work than
any that has as yet been accomplished in this
direction ? If so, we may hope, that, sooner or
later, a Master will arise among us, great enough
to accomplish it. If not, the period of decadence
cannot be very far distant : for, no School can
exist, for any length of time, upon a dead level.
If it be not progressing towards greater things,
it must be dying out ; and the sooner some new
manifestation of genius supersedes it, the better.
Let us try to cast aside all prejudice, in either
direction ; and dispassionately weigh our chance
of advancement on the old lines against that of
the discovery of a new path.
The most sanguine believer in progress wilt
scarcely venture to assert that the labours of the
last fifty years have effected any improvement
in the Symphony, the Quartet, or the Sonata.
Yet, the average efficiency of Instrumentalists,
of all kinds, and in all countries, is probably
greater, at this moment, than it has ever been
before. Setting aside Paganini, as an exceptional
phenomenon, rather than a Classical Virtuoso, no
greater Violinist than Joachim has ever lived ;
nor, bearing his great Concerto and other im
portant works in mind, can we speak lightly of
him as a Composer. Except for his unrivalled
powers, which admit of no comparison with those
of any other Artist, there are many others whom
we should thankfully place in the highest rank
of all ; and who really are second to him alone.
It is doubtful whether the Violoncello was ever
played as it is now played by Piatti ; and those
who do not remember Dragonetti will be quite
prepared to believe the same of Bottesini and
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
the Double -Bass. What Joachim is to the Violin,
Clara Schumann is to the Pianoforte — the most
poetical interpreter now living of the great works
of the Classical Schools; and, judging as well
as we can by the traditions handed down to us,
the most perfect, in some respects, on record.
Scarcely less remarkable, as the representative
of a newer School, is Hans von Billow, who, not
withstanding his strong predilections in favour
of Liszt and Wagner, is rivalled by few in his
reading of the works of the older Masters, from
Bach to Beethoven. Even Liszt himself, the
Paganini of the Pianoforte, and the greatest
executant of the century, still possesses powers,
which, despite his seventy years, one sometimes
half expects to welcome once more in all the
glories of a second youth ; and of which we do,
in a manner, see a strange revival in the per
formances of Rubinstein. We speak of the giants
only, having no room tp chronicle the facts at
our command. Yet who can forget the names
of Halle, and Madame Norman -Neruda, of
Arabella Goddard, Agnes Zimmermann, Marie
Krebs, and a hundred other conservative Artists
who delight us every day; and not these only,
but a host of players on every Orchestral In
strument, so accomplished in their generation,
that many of the Second Violins of to-day would
have been thankfully accepted as Leaders, not
so very many years ago. Whence, then, in pre
sence of so splendid an array of Virtuosi, the
manifest decline in Instrumental Compositions of
the highest order ? We shall best explain it by an
illustration drawn from the history of another Art.
The Instrumental Movements of Beethoven and
Schumann, present, towards those of Haydn
and Mozart, a contrast curiously analogous to that
which the voluptuous chiaroscuro of Correggio
presents to the clearer definitions of Pietro
Perugino, and the youthful Raffaelle. Now Cor
reggio was, himself, so consummate a draughts
man, that, knowing, to a hair's breadth, where
his contours would fall, he could afford to throw
them into shadow, whenever he pleased, without
running the slightest risk of injuring his 'draw
ing.' But, among his would-be imitators were
certain very poor draughtsmen, who found it
much easier to throw in a shadow, than to fix
the place of a correct outline. So, the contours
of the early Masters were condemned, as ' hard ' ;
and the chiaroscuro of Correggio was used to
cover a multitude of incorrect outlines; and so
it came to pass, that a notable degradation of
Art was once referred to this great Master's
School. In like manner, Beethoven, having a
perfect symmetrical form at command, could
afford to clothe it, to any extent, with those
deeply imaginative passages which formed the
very essence of his genius, without running the
slightest risk of distorting its fair proportions.
But, among some later Composers, this reverence
for form has either passed unnoticed, or fallen
into contempt, as a relique of barbarism ; and
the stringing together of passages, supposed to
be imaginative, has been held to be all that
is necessary for the production of a Work of Art.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 311
There can be no more fatal error than this : and
Beethoven's own history proves it. We know
that he worked hard at Fux's 'Gradus,' and
Albrechtsberger's 'Anweisung'; and that, after
wards, he produced many wonderful works. And
we know that some of his followers, whose works
are not at all wonderful, have not worked hard,
either at Albrechtsberger or Fux. Of course,
this may be merely a coincidence. The merest
beginner will tell us, now-a-days, that Fux and
Albrechtsberger were superseded, long ago. No
doubt, Beethoven used their miserable books as
the basis of his method, because no better ones
had then been published. Still, he seems to
have got some small amount of good out of them.
At any rate, so far as the Symphony is concerned
— to go no farther — there is ' writing ' in the im
mortal Nine which has not yet been equalled, but
which, nevertheless, must be more than equalled,
if the School has not yet entered upon the period
of its decline.
In considering the future of Sacred Music, it
is difficult to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion,
with regard to the coming history, either of the
Oratorio or the Mass. We cannot but look for
ward with deep interest to the production of
Gounod's new work, 'The Redemption,' at the
Birmingham Festival of 1882 ; nor can we doubt
that it will be worthy of its Composer's reputa
tion. Still, it must be evident to every one,
that, since the year 1846, the Oratorio has not
shown a tendency to rise, either in England or
in Germany, to a higher Ideal than that which
was presented to us at the memorable Birmingham
Festival of that year. Many reasons may be ad
duced for this — among them, a technical one, of
trenchant force. The chief strength of an Oratorio
lies in its Choruses. Where these are weak, no
amount of beautiful Airs will save the work . And,
they always will be weak, unless they rest upon a
firm contrapuntal foundation. This fact enables
us to predict, without fear of contradiction, that,
cceteris paribus, the best Contrapuntist will write,
not only the best Oratorio, but the best Mass ;
for the same law applies, with equal force, to the
modern Mass with Orchestral Accompaniments.
No one will attempt to say that the sensuous
beauty, either of Rossini's ' Messe Solennelle, ' or
Gounod's, is the highest type of perfection to which
a Choral Composer can aspire. Verdi's ' Requiem '
is as theatrical as ' Aida ' — far more so than ' II
Trovatore,' or ' La Traviata.' Anomalies such as
these invariably present themselves, in Sacred
Music, where contrapuntal skill is wanting; for,
in this kind of Composition, inventive power will
prove of no avail, without an equal amount of con
structive power to support it. How is this power
to be acquired ? At this moment, there is no
Master in Europe capable of taking Hauptmann's
place, as a teacher of Counterpoint; and, were
such a Master to arise among us, it is doubtful
whether, in the present state of public feeling,
his learning would meet with adequate recogni
tion. This is an evil, the continuance of which no
School can survive. If the Oratorio is to rise
higher than it has yet done, our next generation
312 SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
of Composers must take the difficulty into serious
consideration, and not affect to think lightly of
the only means by which success has hitherto
been attained.
Since the downfall of the Polyphonic Schools,
the true Church Style — the 'Stilo alia Cappella' of
the 1 6th century — has lain entirely dormant:
but, within the last few years, attempts have
been made to revive it, both in Germany, in
France, and in England. In Germany, the move
ment was begun in 1853 by Dr. Karl Proske,
who printed a large collection of the finest works
of the 1 6th century,1 and introduced them, with
great effect, into the Services of the Cathedral at
Regensburg, of which he was Canon, and Kapell
meister. After his death the work was carried
on by the ' Caecilien Verein,' which has done much
towards the dissemination of a taste for the pro
ductions of the true Polyphonic School, and led
to their constant performance in all parts of
Germany.
In France, the increased love for Plain Chaunt,
which manifested itself, some thirty years ago, in
the Dioceses of Paris, Rouen, Rheims, Cambrai,
and other parts of the country, has, to a great
extent, supplanted the frivolous style of Music
once so miserably popular.
In England, the movement began, about thirty-
five years ago, with the introduction of Gregorian
Tones to the Psalms, at Margaret Street Chapel,
S. Paul's, Knightsbridge, S. Barnabas', Pimlico,
and some other London Churches, including the
Chapel of S. Mark's College, Chelsea. After a
time, and mainly through the zeal of the Rev.
Thomas Helmore, the taste for this kind of
Music spread rapidly; and this taste — assisted,
perhaps, by party feeling — soon made 'Grego-
rians' so popular, that it would be impossible to
number the Churches in which they were sung.
Unhappily, the present leaders of the movement
seem utterly blind to the fact that ' Gregorians'
cannot, without entirely losing their distinctive
character, be sung with modern Harmonies fit
only for the Theatre. The only hope for success
lies in the stern prohibition of this vulgar and in
tolerable abuse ; the perpetuation of which would
be a far greater evil than an immediate return to
the ' Double Chaunt ' of fifty years ago.
But, the most interesting question at present
is that which concerns the future prospects of
the Lyric Drama. We have seen, that Wagner,
and Bo'ito, the leaders of the extreme section
of the Neo-Teutonic, and Neo-Italian parties, are
in favour of sacrificing everything to dramatic
effect; of substituting an elaborate form of
Recitative for continuous Melody ; of height
ening the effect of this by rich and varied Or
chestral Accompaniments ; and, of supplying the
place of regular form by allotting certain special
phrases to every character in the Drama.2 We
have seen, that, within a comparatively short
space of time, they have almost entirely banished
the older forms of Italian and German Opera
from the Stage ; and, that even Verdi, who once
See MUSICA DIVINA, vol. ii. p. 411.
2 See LEITMOTIF.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
depended wholly upon Melody for his success,
has, to a certain extent, adopted their principles.8
On the other hand, we have seen that a more
moderate party, numbering among its ranks some
young Composers of acknowledged merit, is
neither prepared to sacrifice dramatic truth to
musical symmetry, nor musical symmetry to dra
matic truth: but is determined to use Melody,
Harmony, and Form, as means of enforcing Ex
pression, Action, and the varied demands of
scenic propriety — not as hindrances to them ;
and, in so doing, to work out the main principles
adopted by Mozart and Weber, without com
mitting itself to any peculiarities of style, or
method, beyond those dictated by the talent or
fancy of the writer. There is much hope that
these reasonable views may lead to a careful re
consideration of many things, which, in the heat
of recent controversy, have been too violently
debated on both sides. That a reaction of some
kind must take place, sooner or later, seems
certain ; and it is of immense importance that it
should be a temperate one, otherwise it will
leave us in greater doubt than ever.
In passing from the future of Dramatic Music
to that of Vocal Music generally, we find our
selves face to face with a new difficulty. On
every Instrument in use, except the common
Slide-Trumpet, we have attained a facility of
execution, infinitely in advance of that which
prevailed fifty years ago. But, within the same
period, our Schools of Vocalisation have sensibly
degenerated. Leaving Catalan!, Pasta, Sontag,
and Jenny Lind out of the question, there is no
Theatre in Europe which, at this moment, could
bring together such a body of Singers as formed
the average Company of Her Majesty's Theatre,
under the Lumley management. Where can
we hear 'II Don Giovanni' sung, as it used to
be sung, season after season, by Grisi, Persiani,
Rubini, Tamburini, and Lablache ? There is no
such Quintet attainable : not so much from lack
of Voices as from lack of method. A good many
of us are to blame for this. Our 'Maestri di
canto,' in the first instance, of course; and our
Singers also. But, are our Composers guiltless?
Was there ever a period at which the capabilities
of the Voice were so contemptuously disregarded,
as they are at this moment ? The evil began in
Germany. We dare hardly write the name of
the giant who originated it ; but, if Beethoven's
disregard of vocal capabilities has materially
hindered — as it most certainly has — the perform
ance of two, at least, of his greatest works, how
can men of ordinary genius hope to succeed in
spite of it ? Time was, when Composers regarded
the study of the Voice as indispensable to their
education ; and surely, the course of study which
led to such splendid results, in the cases of
Handel, Haydn, Mozart, Cimarosa, and Rossini,
must have reacted upon the Singers for whom
they wrote, and tended to perpetuate a School of
Vocalists capable of doing full justice to their
Music. We know that it did so ; since it was
3 See p. 301 6.
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
not until after Rossini retired from public life,
that the degradation of which we complain began.
Composers, and performers, who thoroughly un
derstand and sympathise with each other, may
accomplish anything : but, what can be expected
from a Singer who finds his Voice treated like a
Clarinet1? It is scarcely worth his while even to
try to find out what his Voice can do, and what
it cannot.
In summing up the results of our enquiry, we
cannot fail to see that a glorious Future lies open
before us, if we will only take the pains to work
for it. There is a greater amount of activity in the
musical world, at this moment, than the longest-
lived among us has ever known before ; probably
more than ever before existed. One remarkable
sign of it is to be found in the unceasing demand
for the works of the Great Masters, which leads
to their continual republication, in every con
ceivable form, in Germany, in France, and in
England. Augener's cheap editions of the Piano
forte Classics; the Svo Oratorios and Cantatas
published by Novello, and Pv. Cocks ; the enor
mous collection of standard works issued by
Litolff, Richault, Peters, etc. ; Breitkopf & Har-
tel's complete editions of Palestrina, Handel,
Bach, Mozart, and Beethoven ; Michaelis's of
the early French Operas — these, and many like
collections, all have their tale to tell. If we
do not play and sing grand Music, it is not
from the difficulty of obtaining copies. And not
less remarkable are the additions to our Musical
Literature. The publication, in English, of such
works as Jahn's ' Life of Mozart,' Holmes's
volume on the same subject, Spitta's 'Life of
Bach,' Hensel's ' Mendelssohn Family,' and
other important treatises on Musical Science
and Biography, is very significant.
But this is only one manifestation of energy.
Whatever may be our own peculiar views, we
must admit that the amount of zeal displayed
by Wagner, Richter, von Bulow, and other
prominent members cf the advanced party, in
Germany, is enormous. Brahms, Raff, and
Hiller, are all doing something. Liszt is busy,
in his own peculiar way ; while the chiefs of
the rising Dramatic School are equally so, in
theirs. Gounod, Saint Sae'ns, and Delibes, are
active in France, and many clever musicians in
America. [See UNITED STATES.] We do not
say that all this feverish exertion will last. It
cannot. Nor is it even desirable that it should.
But it is a sign of immense vitality. To go no
farther than our own country, the daily life of
Art among us is almost incredible. In every
Cathedral in England, and many Parish Churches,
there are two full Choral Services every day. At
Oxford, and still more at Cambridge, the study
of Music is enthusiastically prosecuted. Not
very long ago, Music was unknown at our Public
Schools ; now, it is fully recognised at Eton, and
Harrow, and many others. Our Provincial Fes
tivals, once brought into notice by Sir George
Smart and Prof. E.Taylor, and now spread even
to Scotland, are not only more numerous and suc
cessful than ever, but are more wisely managed,
SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION. 313
in every way, and rarely pass without bringing
forward some new work, not always of the highest
order, but always worth listening to, if only as
a sign that some young Composer is trying to
do his best. To this must be added, the work
done in London, at the two Italian Opera
Houses, during the Season, and, in the Winter,
by Carl Rosa's spirited Company ; the enormous
amount of Orchestral and Choral Music presented
to the public by the Philharmonic, the New
Philharmonic, the Crystal Palace Concerts, the
Sacred Harmonic Society, the Bach Choir, and
the Richter Concerts ; the Performances directed
by Barnby, and Henry Leslie ; the Musical
Union, which, under Ella's direction, first in
troduced to London in 1845 that most instruc
tive key to the better understanding of our
Classical Concerts, the ' Analytical Programme,'
and has since given a hearty welcome to all the
best Continental Virtuosi who have visited this
country ; and the perfect Chamber Music at the
Monday and Saturday Popular Concerts, Chas.
Halle's Recitals, and Dannreuther's Musical
Evenings. Nor do our rulers grudge the money
necessary for the encouragement of Music among
those who are unable to provide the luxury for
themselves. We do not say that the money voted
by Parliament for this purpose is so well spent as
it might be. That the grant is strangely misap
plied there can be no doubt. But, these are not
days in which confusion of any kind can be long
continued. The matter must, and most certainly
will, be carefully considered ; and the grant so
used as to ensure the utmost amount of good
fruit that can be extracted from it. Meanwhile,
the fact remains, that, whether the result of the
expenditure be satisfactory, or not, the astounding
sum of £130,000 is annually voted by Govern
ment, for the purpose of elementary musical
education; and the time surely cannot be far
distant, when it will be so applied as to produce
a proportionate result. The reports on the state
of Music, in England, and on the Continent,
drawn up by Dr. Hullah, for the Education
Department, show the great interest with which
the subject is regarded by those who have it
in their power to exert a lasting influence upon
the time to come. Lastly, a more hopeful sign
of life than any we have mentioned is to be
found in the proposal for a Royal College of
Music. Discussed, then dropped, resumed, dropped
again, but always advancing a little nearer to
maturity, the scheme has now, for some con
siderable time, attracted the attention of lovers
of Art, who are thoroughly in earnest in their
devotion to its interests ; and, at last, there seems
good hope of bringing the discussion to a success
ful issue. The late great meeting at Manchester,
in which three members of the Royal Family took
so prominent a part, has done much towards the
attainment of this end. In fact, should the
scheme be put into execution, on a suitable scale,
as there is every reason to hope it will, our Eng
lish School will maintain itself, in such sort as
not only to do credit to its early ancestry, but
to bring forward a later generation capable of
3H SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
winning for it a more honourable name than it
has ever yet boasted.
But, the greater our privileges, the greater
our responsibilities, and the more arduous our
duties. We must first work for our College, in
order that our School may have a worthy home.
Having secured that, we must work for our School ;
and our School must work for Art. It is here that
the difficulty lies ; not only in England, but in
every School in Europe. If the actual work ac
complished, during the last thirty years, bore any
reasonable proportion to the zeal and activity
displayed, we should indeed have good cause for
present thankfulness, and hope for the time to
come. But it does not. In spite of all that has been
done — and we have not been slow to acknowledge
the value of this — a million times more has been
left undone. We have been too easily tempted to
mistake activity for progress, and zeal for honest
labour : too readily beguiled by the mad desire to
rush into print, into the Orchestra, the Theatre,
the Cathedral itself, when we ought to have
known that our proper place was in the school
room. To remedy this misguided enthusiasm,
we need a centre of study, governed by a body
of Professors possessing sufficient experience to
justify our fullest confidence, and sufficient learn
ing to give it an authority to which the rising
generation may bow without endangering its own
independence. This point is of immense import
ance. At the present moment, we have no Court
of Appeal, in the competency of which ouryounger
Composers feel any confidence whatever. It is
indispensable that we should establish such a
Court, in order that we may centralise both the
ripe experience and the rising talent of the
country ; thus using the one as a means of in
definitely increasing the value and efficiency of
the other. With such a point oTappui, there is
no reason why England should not take the lead,
and keep it. If, when our College is established,
on a firm and reasonable basis, its Professors will
consistently inculcate the superiority of law to
anarchy ; of reverence to conceit ; of common-
sense to dreams, and fogs, and rhapsodies a tue
t&te ; there is nothing to prevent it from satis
factorily working out the problem on which the
Art-life of the forthcoming twenty years depends,
for its triumph or its downfall. We have shown
that, if the experience of the Past be worth any
thing at all, there are but two Paths by which
the glories of the Future can be reached. Now
it is certain that no sign of a new path has as yet
been vouchsafed to us. It may be discovered, any
day ; but it has not been discovered, yet : and,
as we have maintained throughout, the boldest
attempt hitherto made to discover it has only led
back to a very old path indeed.1 For the present,
therefore, our chief hope lies in going onwards :
and, surely, should we succeed in founding the
Institution in question, we ought to do something
in this direction ! We have greater facilities for
study than ever before were placed within the
reach of the happiest neophyte ; so clear an insight
i See vol. 11. p. 527.
SCHOTT.
into the history of the Past, that the experience
of centuries is open to every one of us ; so vast a
collection of examples, in every style, that the
poorest of us may buy, for a few shillings, works
which our fathers were thankful to copy out,
for themselves, when they could get the chance.
In return for all this, one thing only is required
of us — hard study. The study of History — that
we may learn what led to success, in times past,
and what did not. The study of Counterpoint
—that we may be able to write, in the language
of Art, and not in a patois fit only for a rustic
merry-making. The study of Form — that we
may learn how to present our ideas in intel
ligible sequence, and to emulate, in so doing, the
conciseness of true logicians. The study of Style
— that we may not only learn to distinguish
works of one School from those of another, but
may be able, also, to seize upon that which is
good, wheresoever it may present itself to our
notice, while we reject that which is evil.
We need entertain no fear for the Future, so
long as these things are conscientiously studied
by those who are destined to be its leaders. But
if, in the absence of such studies, the work which
ought to be done by the intellect be entrusted to
the ear — in accordance with a vicious practice.
which, defended by a still more vicious theory,
seems to be daily gaining ground — no reasonable
hope will be left to us. And, in that case, it would
be infinitely to our advantage that Composers
should cease to produce anything at all, and
leave us to subsist upon the heirlooms which
have, from time to time, been handed down to
us by our forefathers, until some new and worthy
manifestation shall declare itself. The Great
Masters have left us quite enough to live upon :
but, we cannot live upon the produce of a School
of Mediocrity. [W.S.R.]
SCHOTT, ANTON, born June 25, 1846, at Stau-
feneck in Suabia, was educated at the military
academy at Ludwigsburg,Wiirtemberg, and served
as an artillery officer through the war of 1866.
Some time after, his voice attracted the attention
of Pischek, and of the wife of Professor David
Strauss, well known in Germany before her
marriage as Agnes Schebest, a singer of note,
from the latter of whom he had much instruction
preparatory to his appearance on the stage. On
May 8, 1870, Herr Schott made his de"but at
Frankfort, as Max in ' Der Freischiitz,' with such
success that he determined to abandon the army
in favour of music, though prevented for a time by
the outbreak of the war of 1 8 70, through which he
served and obtained his captaincy. At the close
of the war he left the army and appeared at the
opera in Berlin, Schwerin, and Hanover, where
he is now engaged. He has also played in Vienna
and elsewhere in Germany and Austria, with
great success. He sang in England, June 16,
1879, at a piano recital given by Dr. von Billow
at St. James's Hall, at a second recital, and at a
New Philharmonic concert, in all which he was
well received. He appeared Jan. 10, 1880, at
Her Majesty's Theatre (Carl Eosa), as Rienzi,
and afterwards as Lohengrin; but though his
SCHOTT.
appearance and voice are both magnificent, his
singing had hardly the success which might have
been expected from his reputation in Germany.
There he is regarded as one of the best operatic
tenors of the day, especially in ' heroic parts ' ;
his repertoire is large, and consists, besides those
mentioned, of Tannhauser, John of Leyden,
Eaoul, Robert, Vasco di Gama, Manrico, Masa-
niello, Ferdinand Cortez, and Benvenuto Cellini
— the last on its production at Hanover under
Dr. Hans von Biilow. More recently he has
studied further with Professor Blume, and on
Feb. 8, 1 88 1, created the part of Azim in Stan
ford's ' Veiled Prophet of Khorassan/ on its pro
duction at Hanover. [A.C.]
SCHOTT (B. SCHOTT'S SOHNE), the well-
known firm of music-publishers at Mayence. This
business, the largest of the kind except Breitkopf
& Hartel's, was founded in 1773 by BERNHARD
SCHOTT, and carried on after his death in 1817
by his sons ANDREAS (born 1781, died 1840),
and JOHANN JOSEPH (born 1782, died 1855),
who in the early part of this century set up a
house of their own at Antwerp (afterwards re
moved to Brussels) which gave them an advan
tage both in suppressing pirated editions, and in
dealing with the French and Italian composers
then in vogue. In 1838 they founded a branch
in London, superintended by a third brother,
ADAM, and conducted with great success since
1849 by J. B. Wolf (born 1815, died 1881).
Another branch in Paris soon followed. PETER,
a younger brother of FRANZ PHILIPP, and grand
son of Bernhard, lived in Brussels and managed
the business of the branches there and in Paris,
forwarding at the same time the circulation of
the Mayence publications. Besides these four in
dependent houses the firm has depots in Leipzig,
Rotterdam, and New York. FRANZ PHILIPP (born
18 1 1 ), grandson of Bernhard, took part in the busi
ness from 1825, and managed it after the death
of his father Andreas, first in partnership with
his uncle Johann Joseph, and after his death by
himself. Since his death in Milan in 1874 the
business has been carried on with the old
traditions by PETER SCHOTT (a son of the
Brussels Peter), FRANZ VON LANDWEHR (a
nephew of the family), and DR. L. STRECKER.
The Schotts have for long been music-publishers
to the court.
At a time when the book and music trade
was regulated by no fixed laws, the correct and
elegant editions of Mayence found a ready en
trance into foreign countries, and the firm was
; thus stimulated to keep ahead of rivals by
making constant improvements in music-printing
and engraving. They were the first to use
li thography for this purpose, an important turning-
point in the printing of music. Their copyright
publications now amount to over 23,000, in
cluding Beethoven's latest quartets, pth Sym
phony, and Mass in D, nearly all the operas of
Donizetti, Rossini, Adam, and Auber, most of
Rink'a organ-music, and, to come to later times,
: Wagner's ' Meistersinger ' and ' Ring des Nibe-
lungen.' The establishment has been enlarged
SCHRODER.
315
by the addition of a printing-office (where have
been printed, among others, Gottfried Weber's
theoretical works, the periodical 'Cacilia,' 1824-
1848, etc.) and in 1829 of a piano-factory, which
however was given up in 1860 on account of the
extension of the main business.
The Schotts, besides innumerable services to
art and artists, have done good work in a smaller
circle by fostering music in Mayence itself.
Franz and his wife Betty (nee Braunrasch, born
1820, died 1875) left a considerable sum for the
maintenance of a permanent orchestra and con
ductor of eminence, in order that Mayence might
hold its own in music with the richer cities of
the Rhine provinces. [C.F.P.]
SCHOTTISCHE ('The Scotch dance'), a
round dance very similar to the polka. It must
not be confounded with the Ecossaise, which was
a country dance of Scotch origin introduced into
France towards the end of the last century. The
Schottische was first danced in England in 1848,
when it was also known as the German Polka.
It does not seem to have been danced in Paris,
as Cellarius (La Danse des Salons, Paris 1847)
does not include it amongst the dances he de
scribes. The music is almost the same as that
of the polka, but should be played rather slower.
The following is the tune to which it was ori
ginally danced in England.
[W.B.S.]
SCHRODER -DEVRIENT, WILHELMINE, a
highly-gifted dramatic singer, was born at Ham
burg, December I8O4.1 Her father, Friedrich
Schroder — who died in 1818 — had been an excel
lent baritone singer, a favourite in many operas,
especially in Mozart's ' Don Juan,' which he was
the first to act in German. Her mother was
Antoinette Sophie Burger, a celebrated actress,
sometimes called ' die grosse Schroder ' and ' the
German Siddons.'
Wilhelmine was the eldest of four children.
She enjoyed great advantages of training ; danc
ing lessons, and public appearances in ballets in
early childhood, helped her to mastery of atti
tude and elasticity of movement; afterwards,
when her parents' wanderings led them to Vienna,
she took such parts as Ophelia, and Aricia
(Schiller's ' Phadra '), at the Hofburgtheater, re
ceiving careful instruction in gesture and delivery
1 According to her own account, as quoted in GlUmer's 'Erin-
nerungen,' and not in October 1805, as stated by F6tis.
316
SCHRODER.
from her mother, who afterwards superintended
her study of operatic parts.
Thus there was no trace of the debutante, when,
in 1821, Wilhelmine made a brilliant first ap
pearance at the Vienna opera-house in 'Die Zau-
berflbte.' The freshness of her well - developed
soprano, her purity of intonation and certainty
of attack, astonished the public. ' It was as if a
singer had fallen from the clouds.' Other early
triumphs were Emmeline (Weigl's 'Schweizer-
familie '), where the representation was described
as 'masterly, ideal and full of truth; in dress
and bearing klyllically picturesque'; Marie
(Gre'try's 'Barbe bleu' *), where she showed her
self worthy of all praise 'as well in singing as in
acting, especially in parts demanding passionate
expression.' As Agathe (Der Freischiitz) her glori
ous voice and charming appearance won great
approval, not only from the public ' who already
loved her,' but from Weber, who presided over
the performance at Vienna, March 7> *822.
But her great achievement was the creation of
the part of Leonore, on the revival of ' Fidelio' at
Vienna later in the year. Hitherto connoisseurs
had failed to discover the merits of Beethoven's
opera. Mdlle. Schroder's impersonation of the
heroine, besides laying the foundation of her own
fame, redeemed the music from the imputation
of coldness, won for the work the praise so
long withheld, and achieved its ultimate popu
larity by repeated performances in Germany,
London, and Paris. The story of her first appear
ance in the part has often been quoted from
Gliimer's 'Erinnerungen an Wilhelmine Schroder
Devrient.' Beethoven was present at the per
formance. 'He sat behind the conductor, and
had wrapped himself so closely in the folds of his
cloak than only his eyes could be seen flashing
from it.' Schroder's natural anxiety only height
ened the effect of her play. A breathless stillness
filled the house until Leonore fell into the arms
of her husband, when a storm of applause broke
out which seemed unceasing. To Beethoven
also had his Leonore been revealed in the glowing
life of Schroder's representation. He smilingly
patted her cheek, thanked her, and promised to
write an opera for her. Would that he had 1
In 1823 she went to Dresden to fulfil a con
tract to sing at the Court Theatre for two years,
at a salary of 2000 thalers. (At a later period
she received 4000 thalers at the same house, for
her connection with Dresden never entirely
ceased as long as she was on the stage.) She mar
ried Karl Devrient, an excellent actor whom she
met in Berlin during an engagement there that
year. Four children were born, but the marriage
was not a happy one, and was dissolved in 1828.
During the next eight years she delighted her
audiences by her appearance in the great classical
characters which ever remained her most suc
cessful parts. In Weber's operas, as Preciosa,
Euryanthe and Reiza, she is said to have thrown
a new light over both story and music, gradually
heightening the interest of the work until a
« 'Baoul Barbe bleu' (1789), Germanized into 'Raoul der Blau-
tart.'
SCHRODER.
torrent of inspiration carried all before it. ]
Spontini's ' Vestale,' she was the very personii
cation of the spirit of the antique. Yet no lei
did she succeed, in Paer's comic opera, ' Sargino
in singing with so much finish, and acting wit!
so much humour, that it became a matter of dig
pute whether tragedy or comedy was her forte.
In 1820 she passed through Weimar and sanj
to Goethe on her way to Paris to join Rocket
German company. With an exalted sense o
the importance of her mission, she wrote: ']
had to think not only of my own reputation, bul
to establish German music, My failure would
have been injurious to the music of Beethoven,
Mozart and Weber.3 This date was an epoch in
the history of music in Paris. Bouquets — then
an extraordinary manifestation of approval — were
showered upon the triumphant singer. In her
subsequent visits to Paris, 1831 and 32, she sang
in Italian opera.
In 1832, Schroder-Devrient was heard at the
King's Theatre in London, engaging with Mr.
Monck Mason to sing ten times monthly during
May, June and July, for £'8oo and a benefit.
Chelard was conductor. 'Fidelio,' 'Don Juan/
and Chelard's ' Macbeth ' were repeatedly given,
but Chorley ('Musical Recollections') says, 'Fi
delio was the solitary success of a disastrous en
terprise. . . . The sensation is not to be forgotten.
The Italians (not very strong that year), were
beaten out of the field by the Germans. The
intense musical vigour of Beethoven's opera was
felt to be a startling variety, wrought out as it
was in its principal part by a vocalist of a class
entirely new to England. This was Madame
Schroder-Devrient. Within the conditions of
her own school she was a remarkable artist
She was a pale woman ; her face, a thoroughly
German one, though plain, was pleasing, from
the intensity of expression which her large
features and deep tender eyes conveyed. She
had profuse fair hair, the value of which she
thoroughly understood, delighting, in moments
of great emotion, to fling it loose with the wild
vehemence of a Maenad. Her figure was superb
though full, and she rejoiced in its display. Her
voice was a strong soprano, not comparable in
quality to some other German voices of its
class but with an inherent expressiveness
of tone which made it more attractive on the
stage than many a more faultless organ
Her tones were delivered without any care, save
to give them due force. Her execution was bad
and heavy. There was an air of strain ana
spasm throughout her performance.'
The ' Queen of Tears ' (so she was styled) was
heard next season in 'Der Freischiitz,' 'Pie Zau-
berflote/ 'Euryanthe/ and 'Otello.' The engage
ment was to sing for Mr. Bunn at Covent Garden
twenty-four times at £40 a night, and once for
the benefit of the speculators. However, all
London was under the spell of Taglioni and of
Fanny Elsler. Malibran in the English opera;
Pasta, Cinti-Damoreau, Rubini, and Tamburim,
in the Italian opera, sang to empty houses.
Again in 1837, after Malibran's death, Mr. Bunn
SCHRODER.
engaged Schroder-Devrient at a double salary.
'Fidelio,' 'La Sonnambula ' and 'Norma' were
performed in English. She broke down in health
before the season was over. It is said that Bunn
forced himself into her sick-room one night, to
insist on her showing herself in character upon
the stage for one moment, to enable him to put
off the performance ' on account of the sudden
indisposition of the singer' — and yet keep the
entrance money. After a rest, too short to be
beneficial, she resumed her work, and was car
ried home insensible from the theatre. She was
able however to give a farewell performance of
'Fidelio,' with the last act of the 'Montecchi
e Capuletti,' and then discovered that Mr.
Bunn had declared himself bankrupt and could
pay her nothing. In his book, ' The Stage
both before and behind the Curtain/ Mr. Bunn
complains of the singer's attempts at extor
tion ; says that she demanded the fourth part
of the proceeds of each night, but on this sum
proving to fall short of the fixed salary, asked
for £ i oo.
From 1837 a gradual decline in power was
observed in Madame Schroder-Devrient, though
she continued to delight her audiences all over
Germany in the parts she had identified herself
with. Of Wagner's operas she only appeared
in ' Rienzi/ as Adriano Colonna, in 'Der fliegende
Hollander,' as Senta, and in 'Tannhauser,' as
Venus. His later dramas would have been a
fitting field for her dramatic genius. Gluck's
masterpieces were among her latest studies. Her
last appearance in Dresden was in his ' I phi-
genie in Aulis,' in 1847 ; her last appearance on
any stage took place at Riga, where she played
Romeo. Her concert singing was greatly ad
mired, and one of the liveliest passages in
Mendelssohn's letters * describes the furore
caused by her impromptu execution of ' Adelaide '
in her ordinary travelling dress at the Gewand-
haus Concert of Feb. II, 1841.
Madame Schroder-Devrient had made a second
marriage with Herr von Doling, a worthless
person, who immediately seized upon his wife's
earnings and pension, and left her almost desti
tute, to recover what she could in a long lawsuit.
The marriage was dissolved at her wish. In
1850 she again married Herr von Bock, a man
of culture, who took her to his property in
Livonia. The union promised great happiness,
and Madame von Bock entered with ardour on her
new duties. But she found herself unfitted for a
quiet country life, and sought relief in travelling.
Passing through Dresden, she was arrested on
account of the sympathy she had shown with
the revolution of 1848. An examination in
Berlin resulted in her being forbidden to return
to Saxony ; in the meantime she was exiled from
Russia. Her husband's exertions and sacrifices
secured a reversal of this sentence. In 1856 she
visited some German towns, singing Lieder in
public concerts. Her interpretations of Beetho
ven's 'Adelaide 'and of Schubert's and Schumann's
i Letter, Feb. 14. 1811.
SCHRODER,
317
songs were immensely admired, though by some
thought too dramatic. When at Leipzig her
strength succumbed to a painful illness. She
was devotedly nursed by a sister and a friend at
Coburg, and died Jan. 21, 1860.
Schroder-Devrient's voice, even in her best
days, was of no extraordinary compass, but, to
the last, the tones of the middle notes were of
exceptionally fine quality. Mazatti's teaching,
with further instruction from Radichi and from
Miksch (the Dresden Chorus -master), had not
been sufficient training for the young girl, who
had besides been disinclined to the drudgery of
scale-singing. The neglect of system and of
careful vocal exercise resulted in faulty execu
tion and too early loss of the high notes. This
might have been less observable had she kept to
such simple roles as Pamina and Agathe. But
there seemed a discrepancy between the delicate
organization of her voice and the passionate
energy of her temperament. By force of will
she accomplished more than was warranted by
her natural powers. 'A portion of her life was
exhausted in every song.' As a musical instru
ment the voice was not under her command ; as
a vehicle of expression it was completely so. It
was the dramatic genius of this artist which won
for her an European reputation. She infused a
terrible earnestness 2 into the more pathetic im
personations, while an almost unerring instinct
of artistic fitness, combined with a conscientious
study of the parts, secured a perfection of per
formance which reached every detail of bye-play.
It could be said of her that she never ceased
learning, for she toiled at her art to the end.
She once wrote as follows : ' Art is an eternal
race, and the artist is destroyed for art as soon
as he entertains the delusion that he is at the
goal. It were certainly comfortable to lay down
the task with the costume, and let it rest until
its turn comes round again in the repertoire. I
have never been able to do this. How often,
when the public have shouted approval and
showered bouquets on me, have I retired in
confusion, asking myself : " Wilhelmine, what
have you been about again ?" — then there would
be no peace for me, but brooding the livelong
days and nights until I had hit upon something
better.'
Her good faith and earnestness led her to
condemn a fellow- actress for disrespect to her art
when she carelessly threw down behind the
scenes a handkerchief which had served on the
stage as a Signal of Love. Schroder-Devrient's
play generally inspired others with her own
spirit. On one occasion it moved a Bluebeard
to forget the ordinary artifice used in dragging
his Marie off the stage, and to take her literally
by the hair. 'Almost unconscious with pain
and covered with blood, the artist endured this
torture rather than spoil the effect of the tableau.'
2 Sometimes perhaps a trifle too much, as indeed Mendelssohn
hints in the sequel of the passage quoted above. Even in the Con
cert-room this was so. 'The old Declamalrice,' writes Mendelssohn,
on Nov. 28, 1842, 'thoroughly delighted us all by the great strength
aud vigour of her voice and her whole style.'
318
SCHRODER.
It was easier for her to forgive an injury arising
thus from excess of feeling, than to tolerate the
inadequate support of a first tenor, 'half sponge
half wood '; or to allow the sleepy play of a
prima donna to go unpunished : as when, in
Romeo, she was guilty of tickling the feet of a
too unemotional Giulietta, during the caresses o1
the last scene of Bellini's opera. (See also Mo-
scheles' Life, i. 270.) An audience of ' lederne
Seelen ' was her abhorrence, and the ignorance
of fashionable London forty years ago tried her
sorely. (Ib. 263.)
In his ' Modern German Music,' Chorley
enters upon an analysis of some of Madame
Schroder-Devrient's parts. He and Berlioz (the
latter in letters to the Journal des De"bats, 1843)
concur in condemning the mannerisms which
grew upon her as time went on. Rellstab has
devoted an article to her (' Ges. Schriften,' ix.).
A. von Wolzogen's ' Wilh. Schroeder-Devrient '
(Leipzig, 1863) is the best life, and gives a cir
cumstantial, impartial, and interesting account ;
while Wagner's ' Ueber Schauspieler und San-
ger ' eulogises her depth of feeling and power oi
interpretation. [L. M. M.]
SCHROETER, CHKISTOPH GOTTLIEB, born at
Hohenstein, Saxony, Aug. 10, 1699, long enjoyed
in Germany the honour of having invented the
pianoforte. His claims, first published by himself
in Mitzler's ' Musikalische Bibliothek' (Leipzig,
1738) and repeated in Marpurg's ' Kritische
Brief'e ' (Berlin, 1764) have been examined and
set aside in favour of Cristofori. [See PIANOFORTE,
vol. ii. p. 712.] We learn from Schroeter's auto
biography that at seven years of age he was
placed as a chorister at Dresden, under Kapell
meister Schmidt, and that Graun was his com
panion. The clavichord early became his greatest
pleasure. When he lost his voice he entered the
Kreuz-schule to study thorough-bass, that is,
accompaniment as then practised, and learned to
quill and tune harpsichords, which led him to
the monochord and systems of temperament. On
the wish of his mother that he should study the
ology, he went to Leipzig for that purpose in 1 7 1 7,
but after her death resumed music, returned to
Dresden, and was accepted by Lotti to copy for
him, and write his middle parts. It was at this
time that he endeavoured to combine the charac
teristics of the harpsichord and clavichord, by
inventing two hammer actions, the models of
which he deposited at the Saxon Court in 1721 ;
but immediately afterwards he left Dresden,
taking service with a Baron whom he does not
name, to travel in Germany, Holland, and
England. In 1724 he went to the University of
Jena and began writing upon musical subjects ;
in 1726 he took the organist's place at Minden,
removing in 1732 to Nordhausen, where he re
mained until his death in 1782. A complete list
of his numerous writings is to be found in Gerber's
Lexicon der Tonkiinstler (Leipzig, 1792), ii.
454-5- [A.J,H.]
SCHROETER, JOHANN SAMUEL, an esteemed
pianoforte-player and composer for that instru
ment, was born in 1750 of German parents at
SCHUBART.
Warsaw, where his father, Johann Friedric
was oboist in the royal orchestra. About 171
he accompanied his father and sister to Leipzi
and sang there in the Gewandhaus Concerl
On the breaking of his voice he devoted Lim«
entirely to the piano, and travelled with h
father, brother and sister, performing as th(
went, through Holland to London. There the
made their debut in the concerts of Bach an
Abel at the Thatched House, St. James's Stree
May 2, 1772, Schroeter playing a concerto o
the * Forte Piano,' which J. Christian Bach ha
first performed in 1767, the brother John Hem
on the violin, and the sister, Corona, afterward
a celebrated vocalist, singing. Bumey (in Bees'
Cyclopaedia) says that ' he may be said to hav
been the first who brought into England th
true art of treating that instrument.' Afte
J. C. Bach's death in 1782, he succeeded hie
as music master to the Queen. 'Six Sonata
for the harpsichord or piano forte' are an
nounced by W. Napier in the ' Public Adver
tiser' in 1776 as his op. I, This was followet
in 1778 by op. 3, 'Six Concertos with an accom
paniment for 2 violins and a bass'; and this
again by op. 5 (Berlin), op. 6 (Paris), op. 2, sis
trios (Amsterdam), op. 9 two ditto (Do.). The
'ABC Dario' (p. 144) says of him, 'He has
composed the harpsichord parts of some con
certos ; the accompaniments are by Bach ; they
are neither new nor very striking. He plays
in an elegant and masterly style ; his cadences
are well imagined, and if his penchant was not
rather to play rapidly than al core, he would
excel on the pianoforte.' Burney, on the other
hand (in Rees), says, 'He became one of the
neatest and most expressive players of his time,
and his style of composition, highly polished,
resembles that of Abel more than any other,
It was graceful and in good taste, but so chaste
as sometimes to seem deficient in fire and in
vention.' He did not remain long before the
public in consequence of his marriage with one
of his pupils, a young lady of birth and fortune,
after which he played only at the concerts of the
Prince of Wales and a few others of the nobility.
He died Nov. 2, 1788, in his own house at Pirn-
lico, having lost his voice some years before hy
a severe cold. His marriage was a clandestine
one, and brought him into collision with his
wife's family, the result of which was his sur
rendering all his rights for an annuity of £5°°'
She is the lady who took lessons from Haydn
during his residence in London, and fell violently
in love with him. Haydn spoke of her many
years after as a very attractive woman, and still
handsome, though over sixty ; ' had I been free,
said the patriarch, 'I should certainly have
married her ' — she was then a widow. He dedi
cated to her three clavier trios (B. & H., Nos. i,
2,6). [See vol. i. p. 711.] [C.F.J
SCHUBART, CHRISTIAN- FRIEDEICH VASIXI,
aorn at Obersontheim in Suabia, Nov. 22, i743>
and brought up, not as a musician, at Nord-
ingen, Nuremberg, and Erlangen. In 1 768 we
ind him as organist at Ludwigsburg. His hie
SCHUBART.
seems to have been a very wild and irregular
one, but lie must have been a man of great talent
and energy to justify the eulogies on him so fre
quent in the early volumes of the Allg. musik-
alische Zeitung of Leipzig (see ii. 78, 98, etc.),
and the constant references of Otto Jahn in his
Life of Mozart. He lived in Mannheim, Munich,
Augsburg, and Ulm ; was more than once in
confinement for his misdeeds, and at length was
imprisoned from 1777 to 1787 at Hohenasperg.
He died shortly after his release, Oct. 10, 1797.
His compositions are few and unimportant. A
work of his on musical aesthetics, ' Ideen zu einer
Aesthetik der Tonkust,' was published after his
death by his son Ludwig (Vienna, 1806). From
the notices of it in the A. M.Z. (viii. 801, xiii.
53, etc.) and Jahn's citations, it appears to be
partly a dissertation on the styles, abilities, and
characteristics of great musicians and artists.
It also contains some fanciful descriptions of
the various keys, which Schumann notices (G-es.
Schriften, i. 180) only to condemn. But Schubart
will always be known as the author of the words
of one of F. Schubert's most favourite songs —
' Die Forelle ' (op. 32). The words of 'An den
Tod' and ' Grablied auf einen Soldaten' are also
his. His son further published 2 vols. of his 'Ver-
mischte Schrif ten ' (Zurich, 1812). [Gr.]
SCHUBERT,1 FRANZ PETER, the one great
composer native to Vienna, was born Jan. 31,
1797, in the district called Lichtenthal, at the
house which is now 2 numbered 54 of the Nuss-
dorfer Strasse, on the right, going out from Vienna.
There is now a gray marble tablet over the door,
with the words ' Franz Schuberts Geburtshaus' in
the centre ; on the left side a lyre crowned with
a star, and on the right a chaplet of leaves con
taining the words, '31 Janner 1797.' He eame
of a country stock, originally belonging to Zuk-
mantel in Austrian Silesia. His father, Franz,
the son of a peasant at Neudorf in Moravia,
was born about 1764, studied in Vienna, and
in 1784 became assistant to his brother, who
kept a school in the Leopoldstadt. His ability
and integrity raised him in 1786 to be parish
schoolmaster in the parish of the 'Twelve holy
helpers' in the Lichtenthal, a post which he
kept till 1817 or 18, when he was appointed to
the parish school in the adjoining district of the
Kossau, and there he remained till his death,
July 9, 1830. He married early, while still
helping his brother, probably in 1783, Elisa
beth Vitz, or Fitz, a Silesian, who was in service
in Vienna, and was, like Beethoven's mother,
1 The following abbreviations are used in the notes to this ar
ticle :-
K.H. = Kreissle -von Hellborn. The first reference to the German
edition; the second, in brackets, to Coleridge's translation.
Ferd. = Ferdinand Schubert, in his biographical sketch ia Schu
mann's Neue Zeitschrift fur die Musik, x. p. 129, etc.
A.M.Z. =• Allgemeine Musikalische Zeitung.
N.Z.M.=-Neue Zeitschrift fiir Musik.
W.Z.K. = Wiener Zeitschrift fiir Kunst, etc.
2 The Nussdorfer Strasse runs north and -south. At the time of
Schubert's birth it was called ' Auf dem Himmelpfortgrund,' and
the house was No. 72. The ' Himmelpfortgrund ' itself (the ' gate of
heaven') was a short street running out of it westwards towards the
fortifications— the same which is now the ' Saulengasse.' The present
Schubertgasse did not then exist beyond the opening into the main
street. I find all this on a large map of the date in the British Museum.
SCHUBERT.
319
a cook. Their first child, Ignaz, was born in
1784. Then came a long gap, possibly filled
by children who died in infancy — of which they
lost nine in all; then, Oct. 19, I794> another
boy, Ferdinand ; then in 96, Karl, then Franz,
and lastly, a daughter, Theresia, Sept. 17, 1801,
who died Aug. 7, 1878. The hard- worked mother
of these 1 4 children lived till 1812. Soon after her
death her husband was married again, to Anna
Klayenbok, a Viennese, and had a second family
of 5 children, of whom 3 grew up, viz. Josefa
(+ 1861), Andreas, an accountant in one of the
public offices, and Anton, a Benedictine priest,
'Father s Hermann' — the last two still living
(1881).
Ignaz and Ferdinand followed their father's
calling, and inherited with it the integrity, fru
gality, and modesty, which had gained him
such respect. Of the former we do not hear
much ; the one letter by him that is preserved
(Oct. 12, 1818), shows him very free-thinking,
very tired of schoolmastering, very much at
tached to his home and his brother.4 He re
mained at the Rossau school till his death in
1844. Ferdinand, on the other hand, rose to be
director of the chief normal school of St. Anna
in Vienna, and played a considerable part in the
life of his celebrated brother, by whom he was
fondly loved, to whom he was deeply attached,
and whose eyes it was given to him to close in
death.
Little Franz was no doubt well grounded by his
father, and to that early training probably owed
the methodical habit which stuck to him more or
less closely through life, of dating his pieces, a
practice which makes the investigation of them
doubly interesting.3 As schoolmasters the father
and his two eldest sons were all more or less musi
cal. Ignaz and Ferdinand had learned the violin
with other rudiments from the father, and Franz
was also taught it by him in his turn, and the
'clavier' (i. e. probably the pianoforte — for Bee
thoven's op. 31 was published before Schubert had
passed his 6th year) by Ignaz, who was twelve
years his senior. But his high vocation quickly
revealed itself; he soon outstripped these simple
teachers, and was put under Michael Holzer,
the choirmaster of the parish, for both violin and
piano, as well as for singing, the organ, and
thorough bass. On this good man, who long out
lived him, he made a deep impression. ' When
I wished to teach him anything fresh,' he would
say, ' he always knew it already. I have often
listened to him in astonishment.' 6 Holzer
would give him subjects to extemporise upon,
3 Author of a sermon on the 1400th anniversary of the birth of St.
Benedict (Vienna, 18?0), in which he is styled ' Capitularpriester des
Stiftes Schotten ; Curat und Prediger an derStiftspfarre ; Besitzer des
gold. Verdienstkreuzes m. d. Krone."
4 K.H. 146 (i. 149).
5 His usual practice was to write the title of the piece, the date,
and his name, ' F rz Schubert Mpia,' at the head of the first page, on
beginning to compose. In his earlier years he added the full date of
completion at the end, even when it was the same day. See nos. 1, 2,
and 5 of the ' 6 Lieder ' (Muller)— all three belonging to 1813, as given
in Nottebohm's Catalogue, p. 243. Sometimes he has dated each
movement, as in the String Quartet in B b (op. 168), described under
1814. With 1815, however, this minute dating in great measure
ceases, and as a rule we find the year or at most the month stated.
6 N.Z.M.
320
SCHUBERT.
and then his joy would know no bounds, and he
would cry ' the lad has got harmony at his
fingers' ends.' * Such astonishment was natural
enough, but it would have been far better if he
had taught him counterpoint. Ignaz too — and
an elder brother is not always a lenient judge
of his junior — bears similar testimony. ' I was
much astonished/ says he, ' when after a few
months he told me that he had no more need of any
help from me, but would go on by himself ; and
indeed I soon had to acknowledge that he had
far surpassed me, beyond hope of competition.'
Before he became eleven he was first soprano
in the Lichtenthal choir, noted for the beauty
for his voice and the appropriateness of his
expression. He played the violin solos when
they occurred in the service, and at home com
posed little songs, and pieces for strings or for
PF. For a child so gifted, of people in the
position of the Scbuberts, the next step was
naturally the Imperial Convict, or school2 for
educating the choristers for the Court-chapel; and
to the Convict accordingly Franz was sent in
Oct. 1808, when II years and 8 months old. He
went up with a batch of other boys, who, while
waiting, made themselves merry over his gray
suit, calling him a miller, and otherwise crack
ing jokes. But the laugh soon ceased when the
' miller' came under the examiners, the Court-
capellmeisters Salieri and Eybler, and Korner the
singing-master. He sang the trial-pieces in such
a style that he was at once received, and henceforth
the gray frock was exchanged for the gold-laced
uniform of the imperial choristers. The music
in the Convict had been a good deal dropt in
consequence of the war, but after the signing of
the treaty of peace, Oct. 14, 1809, it regained its
old footing, and then Franz soon took his right
place in the music-school. There was an orchestra
formed from the boys, which practised daily
symphonies and overtures of Haydn, Mozart,
Krommer, Kozeluch, MeTiuI, Cherubini, etc., and
occasionally Beethoven. Here his home practice
put him on a level with older boys than himself.
The leader of the band, behind whom he sat,
several years his senior, turned round the first
day to see who it was that was playing so
cleverly, and found it to be 'a small boy in
spectacles named Franz Schubert.'3 The big
fellow's name was Spaun, and he soon became
intimate with his little neighbour. Franz was
extremely sensitive, and one day admitted to his
friend, very confused and blushing deeply, that
he had already composed much ; that indeed he
could not help it, and should do it every day if
he could afford to get music-paper. Spaun saw
the state of matters, and took care that music-
paper should be forthcoming ; for which and other
kindnesses his name will be long remembered.
Franz in time became first violin, and when
1 K.H. 5 (i. 5).
2 In the Piaristengrasse in the Josephstadt. See a very full and
interesting account of this school in Hanslick's excellent book,
'Geschichte des Concertwesens in Wien ' (Vienna, 1869), p. 141.
3 From a sketch by von KOchel, entitled 'Nachruf an Joseph von
Spaun,' Vienna (privately printed), 1866. I owe the sight of this to
my excellent trieiid Mr. PohL
SCHUBERT.
Ruzicka, the regular conductor, was absent, he
took his place. The orchestral music must have
been a great delight to him, but we only hear that
he preferred Kozeluch to Krommer, and that
his particular favourites were some adagios of
Haydn's, Mozart's G minor Symphony, in which
he said ' you could hear the angels singing,'
and the overtures to Figaro and the Zauberflote.
It is also evident from his earliest symphonies
that the overture to Prometheus had made its
mark on his mind. On Sundays and holidays he
went home, and then the great delight of the
family was to play quartets, his own or those of
other writers, in which the father took the cello,
Ferdinand and Ignaz the first and second violins,
and Franz the viola, as Mozart did before him,
and Mendelssohn after him. The father would
now and then make a mistake ; on the first
occasion Franz took no notice, but if it recurred
he would say with a smile, in a timid way, 'Herr
Vater, something must be wrong there."
From a very early date Beethoven was an ob
ject of his deepest reverence. Shortly before he
entered the School the boys' orchestra had been
taken to Schbnbrunn for a performance in Bee
thoven's presence, and Franz was never tired of
hearing the details of the story from those who
were there. A few months later, after some of
his boyish songs to Klopstock's words had been
sung, he asked a friend if it was possible that he
himself ever would do anything ; and on the friend
replying that he could already do a great deal,
answered, ' Perhaps : I sometimes have dreams
of that sort ; but who can do anything after
Beethoven?'4 With this feeling it is doubly
strange that his juvenile works should show so
few traces of Beethoven's direct influence.
The instruction in the Convict was by no means
only musical. There was a Curator, a Director
(Rev. Innocenz Lang), a Sub-director, an In>
spector, a staff of preachers and catechists ; and
there were teachers of mathematics, history and
geography, poetry, writing, drawing, French,
and Italian.5 In fact it was a school, apart from
its music department. Franz of course took his
part in all this instruction, and for the first year
is said to have acquitted himself with credit,
but his reputation in the school fell off as it
increased in the musical department. The ex
traordinary thirst for composition, which is so
remarkable throughout his life, began to assert
itself at this time, and appears to have been
limited only by his power of obtaining paper ;
and it not unnaturally interfered with his general
lessons. His first pianoforte piece of any dimen
sions, and apparently his earliest existing compo
sition, was a 4-hand phantasia, containing more
than a dozen movements, all of different charac
ters, and occupying 32 pages of very small writing.
It is dated 8 April — i May 1810, and was fol
lowed by two smaller ones.6 His brother re
marks that not one of the three ends in the key
< See K.H. 258 (i. 260*.
s See the list of names in K.H. 13 (i. 13).
6 Ferd. p. 133. Keissmann (p. 7) gives the inscriptions-Ten 8,
Aprill angefangen. Den 1. Hay yollbracht. 1810.'
SCHUBERT.
in which it began. The next is a long vocal piece
for voice and PR, called ' Hagars Klage' — Hagar's
lament over her dying son — dated March 30, 1811,
also containing 1 2 movements, with curious un
connected changes of key ; and another, of even
grimmer character, attributed to the same year,
is called ' Leichenfantasie,' or Corpse-fantasia, to
the words of Schiller's gruesome juvenile poem
of the same name : —
Mit eratorbnem Scheinen
Steht der Mond auf todtenstillen Hainen,
Seufzend streicht der Nachtgeist durch die Luft —
Nebenvolken schauern,
Sterne traitern
Bleich herab, wie Lampen in der Graft.
With a deathlike glimmer
Stands the mpou above the dying trees,
Sighing wails the Spirit through the night ;
Mists are creeping,
Stars are peeping
Pale aloft like torches in a cave.
and so forth. This has 1 7 movements, and is quite
as erratic in its changes of key and disregard
of the compass of the voice as the preceding.1
The reminiscences of Haydn's 'Creation/ Mo
zart's opera airs, and Beethoven's Andantes, are
frequent in both. A fourth is 'Der Vater-
morder' — the Parricide — for voice and PF., '26
December, 1811,' a pleasant Christmas piece!
a decided advance on the two previous songs
in individuality of style, and connection. 1811
also saw the composition of a quintet-over
ture, a string quartet, a second phantasia for
4 hands, and many songs.2 For 1812 the list
is more instrumental. It contains an overture
for orchestra in D ; a quartet overture in Bb ;
string quartets in C, Bb, and 3D ; a sonata for
PF., violin, and cello ; variations in Eb, and an
andante, both for PF. ; a Salve Regina and a
Kyrie. In 1813 an octet* for wind; 3 string
quartets in C, Bb, Eb and D; minuets and
trios for orchestra and for PF. ; a third phan
tasia for the PF. 4 hands ; several songs, terzets,
and canons ; a cantata in two movements, for
3 male voices and guitar, for his father's birth
day, Sept. 27 — both words and music his own;
and his first symphony in 5D, intended to cele
brate the birthday of Dr. Lang, and finished on
Oct. 28. With this very important work his time
at the Convict ended. He might have remained
longer ; for it is said that the Emperor, who
took an interest in the lads of his chapel, had
specially watched the progress of this gifted
boy with the lovely voice and fine expression,
and that a special decision had been registered
in his favour on Oct. 21, assuring him a founda
tion scholarship in the school, provided that
1 The autographs of both are In possession of Herr Nicholas Dumba
Of Vienna. 2 ferd. p. 138.
s Kieissle expressly states this (p. 550) and gives the date— 'Nov. 19,
1812.'
* This octet, dated Sept. 19, is said to be mentioned by Ferdinand
Bchubert as ' Franz Schubert's LeichenbegSngniss ' (funeral cere
mony). It is supposed by Kreissle (p. 31) to have been composed for
the funeral of his mother ; but it is difficult to believe that the words
'which he wrote for his father's birthday ode, eight days later, would
haye had no reference to the mother's death— which they certainly
have not— if it had occurred at that date.
5 Adagio and Allegro vivace (D) ; Andante (G) ; Minuet and Trio
(D) ; Finale, Allegro vivace (D). The work was played from MS. at
the Crystal Palace, Feb. 6, 1881. The autograph is in possession of
Herr Dumba, Vienna.
VOL. III. PT. 3.
SCHUBERT.
321
during the vacation he should study sufficiently
to pass an examination.6 This however he de
clined, possibly at the instignatiou of Korner the
poet, who was in Vienna at this time, and is
known to have influenced him in deciding to
throw himself entirely into music.7 He accord
ingly left the Convict (between Oct. 26 and
Nov. 6), and returned home. His mother died
in 1812, but we hear nothing of the event,
unless the octet just named refers to it. The
father married again in about a year, and the
new wife, as we shall see, did her duty to her
stepson Franz fully, and apparently with affec
tion.
Franz was now just completing his seven
teenth year, and what has been rightly called the
first period of his life. The Convict has much
to answer for in regard to Schubert. It was en
trusted with the most poetical genius of modern
times, and it appears to have allowed him to
take his own course in the matter of composition
almost unrestrained. Had but a portion of the
pains been spent on the musical education of
Schubert that was lavished on that of Mozart or
of Mendelssohn, we can hardly doubt that even
his transcendent ability would have been en
hanced by it, that he would have gained that con
trol over the prodigious spontaneity of his genius
which is his only want, and have risen to the
very highest level in all departments of com
position, as he did in song-writing. But though
Eybler andSalieri were the conductors of the choir
in chapel, it does not appear that they had any
duties in the school, and Ruzicka, the thorough
bass master, like Holzer, was so prostrated by
Schubert's facility as to content himself with ex
claiming that his pupil already knew all he could
teach him, and must have ' learned direct from
heaven.' If all masters adopted this attitude to
wards their pupils, what would have become of
some of the greatest geniuses? The discomforts of
the school appear to have been great even for that
day of roughness. One of the pupils speaks of the
cold of the practice-room as ' dreadful' (schauer-
lich) ; and Schubert's own earliest letter, dated
Nov. 24, 1812, to his brother Ferdinand, shows
that these young growing lads were allowed to
go without food for 8| hours, between 'a poor
dinner and a wretched supper.' There was not
even sufficient music paper provided for the
scholars, and Schubert was, as we have seen,
dependent on the bounty of the richer pupils.
On the other hand, the motets and masses in
the service, the rehearsals in the school, such
teaching as there was, and the daily practisings,
must have been both stimulating and improving,
and with all its roughness a good deal of know
ledge could not but have been obtainable. One
advantage Schubert reaped from the Convict — the
friends which he made there, many of them for
life, Spaun, Senn, Holzapfel, Stadler, and others,
all afterwards more or less eminent, who at
tached themselves to him as every one did who
fl K.H. 33 (I. 83).
7 On Spavin's authority. There Is no mention of Schubert In
Korner's letters from Vienna.
322
SCHUBERT.
came into contact with him ; a band of young
adorers, eager to play, or sing, or copy anything
that he composed ; the earnest of the devoted
friends who surrounded him in later years, and
helped to force his music on an ignorant and
preoccupied public. Nor did the enthusiasm
cease with his departure ; for some years after
wards the orchestral pieces which he had written
while at the school were still played by the
boys from his own MS. copies. Outside the
school he had sometimes opportunities of going
to the opera. The first opera which he is said
to have heard was Weigl's ' Waisenhaus,' played
Dec. 12, 1810 ; but this was eclipsed by the
'Schweitzer-familie' of the same composer, July 8,
1811 ; that again by Spontini's ' Vestalin,' with
Milder, Oct. 1, 1 812 ; and all of them by Gluck's
' Iphigenie auf Tauris/ which he probably heard
first April 5, 1815, with Milder and Vogl in the
two principal parts, and which made a deep and
ineffaceable impression upon him, and drove him
to the study of Gluck's scores.1 During the same
years there were also many concerts, including
those at which Beethoven produced his 5th, 6th,
and 7th Symphonies, the Choral Fantasia, por
tions of the Mass in C, the Overture to Coriolan,
and others of his greatest compositions. Schubert
probably heard all these works, but it is very
doubtful whether he heard them with the same
predilection as the operas just mentioned. We
might infer with certainty from the three earliest
of his symphonies, that Beethoven's style had as
yet taken but little hold on him, notwithstanding
the personal fascination which he seems to have
felt for the great master from first to last. But,
indeed, we have his own express declaration to
that effect. Coming home after a performance of
an oratorio of Salieri's, June 16, 1816, he speaks
of the music in terms which can only refer to Bee
thoven, as ' of simple natural expression, free from
all that bizarrerie which prevails in most of the
composers of our time, and for which we have al
most solely to thank one of our greatest German
artists ; that bizarrerie which unites the tragic
and the comic, the agreeable and the repulsive,
the heroic and the petty, the Holiest and a
harlequin ; infuriates those who hear it instead
of dissolving them in love, and makes them
laugh instead of raising them heavenwards.'
Mozart was at the time his ideal composer;
this too is plain from the symphonies, but here
also he leaves us in no doubt. Three days
earlier we find in the same 2 diary, a propos to
one of the quintets of that great master : — 'Gently,
as if out of the distance, did the magic tones
of Mozart's music strike my ears. With what
inconceivable alternate force and tenderness did
Schlesinger's masterly playing impress it deep,
deep, into my heart ! Such lovely impressions
remain on the soul, there to work for good,
past all power of time or circumstances. In
the darkness of this life they reveal a clear,
bright, beautiful prospect, inspiring confidence
and hope. 0 Mozart, immortal Mozart I what
1 From Bauernfeld, In W.Z.K.
I Quoted by K.H. 103. 101 (i. 105. 103).
SCHUBERT.
countless consolatory images of a bright better
world hast thou stamped on our souls.' There
is no doubt to which of these two great masters
he was most attached at the time he wrote this.
We have seen what a scourge the conscription
proved in the case of Ries (iii. I3ia\ and the
uneasiness of Mendelssohn's family till the risk
of it was over in his case (ii. 2626). To avoid
a similar danger3 Schubert elected to enter his
father's school, and after the necessary study
for a few months at the Normal School of St.
Anna, did so, and actually remained there for
three years as teacher of the lowest class. The
duties were odious, but he discharged them
with strict regularity, and not with greater
severity than might reasonably be expected
from the irritable temperament of a musician
condemned to such drudgery. The picture of
Pegasus thus in vile harness, and the absence
of any remark on the anomaly, throws a curious
light on the beginnings of a great composer.
Out of school hours, however, he had his re
laxations. There was a family in the Lichten-
thal named Grob — a mother, son, and daughter
— whose relations to him were somewhat like
those of the Breunings to Beethoven (i. 164 a).
The house was higher in the scale than his
father's, and he was quite at home there.
Therese, the daughter, had a fine high soprano
voice, and Heinrich Grob played both PF. and
cello ; the mother was a woman of taste, and a
great deal of music was made. It is not im
possible that Therese inspired him with a softer
feeling.4 The choir of the Ijichtenthal church,
where his old friend Holzer was still choir
master, was his resort on Sundays and feast
days, and for it he wrote his first mass, in F
— begun May 17, finished July 22, 1814 — a
fitting pendant to the symphony of the previous
October. He was not yet eighteen, and the
mass is pronounced by a trustworthy critic 5 to
be the most remarkable first mass ever produced,
excepting Beethoven's in C, and as striking an
instance of the precocity of genius as Mendels
sohn's Overture to the Midsummer Night's
Dream. It seems to have been first performed
on Oct. 1 6, the first Sunday after St. Theresa's
day, 1814 — May seder, then 25, and an acknow
ledged virtuoso, leading the first violins; and
was repeated at the Augustine Church ten days
after. This second performance was quite an
event. Franz conducted, Holzer led the choir,
Ferdinand took the organ, Therese Grob sang,
the enthusiasm of the family and friends was
great, and the proud father presented his happy
son with a five-octave piano.6 Salieri was pre
sent and loud in his praises, and claimed Schu
bert as his pupil. He had indeed begun to take
some interest in the lad before 7 he left the Con
vict, and continued it by daily lessons ' for a 8loug
time.' That interest was probably much the same
3 He was three times summoned to enlist. See Ferd. p. 133.
« See K.H. 141 (i. 144).
s Mr. Prout. in • Monthly Musical Record,1 Jan. and Feb. 1871.
« Ferd. 1336. i K.H. i. 27n<X«.
6 Bauernfeld, in W.Z.K. June 9. 1829.
SCHUBERT.
that be had shown to Beethoven 1 5 years before,
making him write to Metastasio's words, and cor
recting the prosody of his music. But there
must have been some curious attraction about
the old man, to attach two such original geniuses
as Beethoven and Schubert to him, and make
them willing to style themselves 'scholars of
Salieri.'1 His permanent influence on Schubert
may be measured by the fact that he warned
him against Goethe and Schiller, a warning which
Schubert attended to so far as to compose 67
songs of the one poet, and 54 of the other !
Franz's next effort was an opera — a light and
absurd supernatural ' ope'ra comique ' in 3 acts,
'Des Teufels Lustschloss,' words by Kotzebue.
He probably began it while at the Convict, the
first act having been completed Jan. n, 1814;
the second, March 16; and the third, May 15.
Two days afterwards he began the mass. That
over, he had leisure to look again at the earlier
work. The experience gained in writing the
mass probably revealed many an imperfection in
the opera. He at once rewrote it, and finished
the redaction of it on Oct. 22. The work has
never been performed, nor can it now ever be so,
since the second act, like the MS. of the first
volume of Carlyle's French Revolution, was used
by an officious maid-servant for lighting the fires
as late as 1848. With all these and other labours
he found time to visit the2 Convict in the evenings,
take part in the practices, and try over his new
compositions. Besides the pieces already men
tioned, the productions of 1814 embrace a Salve
Regina for tenor and orchestra. Also 2 string-
quartets in D and C minor, still in MS., and a
third in Bb, published as op. 168, and remarkable
for the circumstances of its composition. It was
begun as a string trio, and ten lines were written
in that form. It was then begun again and
finished as a quartet. The movements are more
full}' dated than usual.3 Also 5 minuets and 6
Deutsche (or waltzes) for strings and horns ; and
1 7 songs, among them ' Gretchen am Spinnrade '
(Oct. 19), and Schiller's 'Der Taucher," a com
position of enormous length, begun Sept. 1813,
and finished in the following August. On Dec. 10
he began his second symphony, in Bb.4 The
autograph shows that the short Introduction and
Allegro vivace were finished by the 26th of the
same month, but its completion falls in 1815.
Before the year closed he made the acquaint
ance of Mayrhofer, a man of eccentric, almost
hypochondriac character, and a poet of grand
and gloomy cast, who became his firm friend,
and 54 of whose 5 poems (besides the operas of
'Adrast' and 'Die beiden Freunde von Sala-
1 For Beethoven see vol. 5. p. 168 o. Schubert so styles himself on
the title-pages of his ' Fernando' and ' Claudine von Villabeila.'
a K.H. 18 U. 19).
3 The Allegro has at beginning '5 Sept. 1814,' at end ' den6 Sept. in
4$ Stunden angefertigt,' apparently implying that it was dashed off
before and after 12 o'clock at night. Andante, at beginning 'den
6 Sept. 1814, ' at end ' den 10 Sept. 1814.' Minuet, at end ' 11 Sept. 1814.'
Finale, at end ' den 13 Sept. 1814.' Autograph with Spina.
« At beginning, '10 Dec. 1814'; at end of Allegro, ' 26 Dec. 1814 '; at
teginning of Finale, '25 Feb. 1815,' and at end, '24 March 1815.' The
Movements are Largo and Allegro vivace (B fc); Andante (Eh); Minuet
fcnd Trio (C minor) ; Finale, Presto vivace (Bb). Played from MS. at
the Crystal Palace, Oct. 20, 1877. Autograph with Heir Dumba.
' 48 published, and 6 in MS.
SCHUBERT.
323
manca'), fortunately for Mayrhofer 's immortality,
he set to music — some of them among his very
finest songs. The acquaintance began by Schu
bert's setting Mayrhofer' s ' Am See.' He com
posed it on the /th December, and a few days
afterwards visited the poet at his lodgings in the
Wipplinger Strasse 420 (since destroyed), a small
dark room rendered illustrious by being the resi
dence of Theodore Korner, and afterwards of
Schubert, who lived there in 1819 and 20. The
visit was the beginning of a friendship which
ended only with Schubert's death.
1815 is literally crowded with compositions.
Two orchestral symphonies of full dimensions,
Nos. 2 and 3 (that in Bb ended March 24, that
in 6D, May 24-July 19); a string quartet in G
minor (March 25-April i) ; PF. sonatas in C, F,
E (Feb. u) and E (Feb. 18) ; an adagio in G
(April 8), 12 Wiener Deutsche, 8 Ecossaises
(Oct. 3), and 10 variations for PF. solo; 2
masses, in G7 (Mar. 2-7) and Bb (Nov. n-);
a new ' Dona ' 8 for the mass in F ; a Stabat
Mater in G minor (April 4) ; a Salve Regina
(July 5) ; 5 large dramatic pieces — ' Der vier-
jahrige Posten, i-act operetta (ended May 16);
'Fernando/ i -act Sit>gspiel( July 3-9); 'Claudine
von Villabeila,' 3-act Singspiel (Act i, July 26-
Aug. 5), originally composed complete, but Acts
•2 and 3 perished in the same manner as the
'Teufels Lustschloss'; 'Die beiden Freunde von
Salamanca,' a 2-act Singspiel by Mayrhofer
(Nov. i8-Dec. 31); 'Der Spiegelritter,' 3-act
opera, of which 8 numbers are with the Gesell-
schaft der Musikfreunde at Vienna ; perhaps
also a Singspiel called Die * Minnesanger,' and
'Adrast,' an opera by Mayrhofer, of which but
two numbers exist.9 In addition to all these there
are no less than 137 songs — 67 printed, and 70
still in MS. In August alone there are 29, of
which 8 are dated the I5th, and 7 the I9th{
And of these 137 songs some are of such enor
mous length as would seem to have prevented
their publication. 'Minona' (MS., Feb. 8), the
first one of the year, contains 1 6, and 'A del wold
and Emma ' (MS., June 5) no less than ^5 closely
written sides. Of those published, * Die Biirg-
schaft' ('Aug. 1815') fills 22 pages of Litolffs
edition, ' Elysium * 1 3, and ' Loda's Gespenst ' 1 5
of the same. It was the length of such compo
sitions as these — 'pas une histoire, mais des
histoires' — that caused Beethoven's exclamation
on his deathbed : ' Such long poems, many of
them containing ten others,' by which he meant
as long as ten. [See p. 346 6.] And this mass of
music was produced in the mere intervals of his
' It Is in the usual number of movements: Adagio maestoso and
Allegro con brio (D) ; Allegretto (G); Minuet and Trio(D); Finale,
Presto vivace (D). Dates :— Allegro, at beginning, '24 May 1815';
end, ' July 12, 1815.' Allegretto, at beginning, 'July 15, 1815.' End of
Finale, 'July 19, 1815.' Autograph with Uerr Dumba.
i Published by M Berra, of Prague, in 1846, as the composition of
B. Fuhrer. [See vol. i. 566 b.\ The fraud was not exposed till 1847,
when it was announced by Ferd. Schubert in the Allg. Wiener Musik-
zeituug of Dec. 14. Ferdinand mentions this mass in his list under
1815. A copy, evidently copied closely from the autograph, but nvith
the addition of oboes (or clarinets) and bassoons by Kerd. Schubert
(July 23, 1847), is in the Library of the Gesellschaft der Musiktreunde.
8 Mentioned by Ferdinand. 139 a.
s Autographs of Fernando, Teufels Lustschloss, and Adrast, are
with Berr Dumba.
Y2
324
SCHUBERT.
school drudgery! Well might his brother say
that the rapidity of his writing was marvellous.
Amidst all this work and, one might be tempt
ed to believe, all this hurry, it is astonishing to
find that some of the songs of these boyish years
are amongst the most permanent of his produc
tions. 'Gretchen am Spinnrade,' a song full of
the passion and experience of a lifetime, was
written (as we have said) in Oct. 1814, when he
was 17. The 'Erl King' itself in its original
form (with a few slight l differences) belongs to
the winter of 1815, and the immortal songs of
the 'Heidenrbslein,' 'Rastlose Liebe,' 'Schafers
KIagelied,'the grand Ossian songs, and others of
his better-known works, fall within this year.
The Mass in G, too, though composed for a very
limited orchestra, and not without tokens of
hurry, is a masterpiece. The dramatic works
contain many beautiful movements, and are full
of striking things, but the librettos are so bad,
that in their present condition they can never
be put on the stage. The symphonies, though
not original, are not without original points;
and are so sustained throughout, so full of fresh
melody and interesting harmony, and so extra
ordinarily scored considering their date, that in
these respects a man of double Schubert's age
might be proud to claim them.
The habit of writing to whatever words came
in his way was one of Schubert's characteristics,
especially in the earlier part of his career. With
his incessant desire to sing; with an abundant
fountain of melody and harmony always well
ing up in him and endeavouring to escape, no
wonder that he grasped at any words, and tried
any forms, that came in his way, and seemed
to afford a channel for his thoughts. If good,
well; if bad, well too. The reason why he
wrote 8 operas in one year was no doubt in great
measure because he happened to meet with 8
librettos ; had it been 4 or 1 2 instead of 8 the
result would have been the same. The variety
in the productions even of this early year is truly
extraordinary. A glance at the list is sufficient to
show that he tried nearly every form of composi
tion, while the songs he set range from gems like
Goethe's ' Meeresstille ' and Schiller's ' Freudvoll
und leidvoll,' to the noisy ballads of Bertrand ;
from Mayrhofer's stern classicality and the gloomy
romance of Ossian, to the mild sentiment of
Klopstock. No doubt, as Schumann says, he could
have set a 2 placard to music. The spectacle of
so insatiable a desire to produce has never before
been seen ; of a genius thrown naked into the
world and compelled to explore for himself all
paths and channels in order to discover by ex
haustion which was the best — and then to die.
During this year he taught diligently and
punctually in his father's school, and attended
Salieri's lessons. His relations to the Lichten-
thai remained as before. The Mass in G, like
1 The Berlin Library possesses an autograph of the earlier form,
and Mad. Schumann one of the later (with triplet accompaniment).
The former was published In facsimile by Espagne (Berlin, Miiller).
2 'Qu'on me donne la Gazette de Hollande,' says Eameau. But
Schubert could have thrown poetry into an advertisement ! ' Give me
the words,' said Mozart, ' aud I'll put the poetry to them.'
SCHUBERT.
that in F, was written for the parish church, and
according to the testimony of one3 of his old
friends was especially intended for those of his
companions who had been pupils of Holzer's with
him. A pleasant relic of his home life exists
in a piece of music written for his father's birth
day, Sept. 27, 1815, for 4 voices and orchestra —
' Erhabner, verehrter Freund der Jugend.' 4 He
kept up his intercourse also with the Convict,
and when he had written anything special it was
one of the first places to which he would take
it. There possibly his Symphonies were tried,
though it is doubtful if a juvenile orchestra would
contain clarinets, bassoons, trumpets, and horns,
all which are present in the scores of the first
four Symphonies. There, thanks to the memo
randum of another old ' Convicter,' we can assist
at the first hearing of the Erl King. Spaun
happened to call one afternoon, in this very
winter, at the elder Schubert's house in theHim-
melpfortgrund, and found Franz in his room, in
a state of inspiration over Goethe's ballad, which
he had just seen for the first time. A few times
reading had been sufficient to evoke the music,
which in the rage of inspiration he was whelming
down5 on to the paper at the moment of Spaun's
arrival; indeed it was already perfect except
the mere filling in of the accompaniment. This
was quickly done ; and it was finished in the form
in which we can now see it in the Berlin6
Library. In the evening Schubert brought it
to the Convict, and there first he and then Holz-
apfel sang it through. It was not altogether well
received. No wonder ; the form was too new,
the dramatic spirit too strong, even for that cir
cle of young Schubert-admirers. At the words
' Mein Vater, mein Vater, jetzt fasst er mich an ! '
where Gb, Ft] and Eb all come together, there
was some dissent, and Ruzicka, as teacher of
harmony, had to explain to his pupils, as best he
might, a combination which now seems perfectly
natural and appropriate.
1816 was passed much as 1815 had been, in
a marvellous round of incessant work. The
drudgery of the school however had become so in
supportable that Schubert seized the opportunity
of the opening of a government school of music,
at Laibach, near Trieste, to apply for the post of
director, with a salary of 500 Vienna florins — £2!
a year. The testimonials which he sent-in in
April from Salieri, and from Joseph Spendou,
Chief Superintendent of Schools, were so cold
in tone as to imply that however much they
valued Schubert, they believed his qualifica
tions not to be those of the head of a large esta
blishment.7 At any rate he failed, and the post
3 Heir Doppler. I cannot refrain from mentioning: this gentle
man, who in 1867 was shopman at Spina's (formerly Diabelli's). I
shall never forget the droll shock I received when on asking him it
he knew Schubert, he replied, ' Know him ? I was at his christening .
Kreissle's Life is indebted to him for many a trait which would other
wise have been lost.
* Now in the Imperial Library, Berlin. Ho doubt there was o
every year, though that of 1814 has been lost.
5 Hinzuwuhlend is Kreissle's word, doubtless from Spaun's lips.
6 If indeed this be the actually first original. The omission of b
!, and its subsequent insertion, however, as well as the clean regular
look of the whole, seem to point to its being a transcript,
rK.H.107(i.l<»).
SCHUBEKT.
was given, on the recommendation of Salieri, to
a certain Jacob Schaufl. Schubert found com
pensation, however, in the friendship of Franz
von Schober, a young man of good birth and
some small means, who had met with his songs
at the house of the Spauns at Linz, and had
ever since longed to make his personal acquaint
ance. Coming to Vienna to enter the University,
apparently soon after the Laibach rebuff, he
called on Schubert, found him in his father's
house, overwhelmed with his school duties, and
with apparently no time for music. There, how
ever, were the piles of manuscript — operas, masses,
symphonies, songs, heaped up around the young
schoolmaster composer, and Schober saw at once
that some step must be taken to put an end to this
cruel anomaly, and give Schubert time to devote
himself wholly to the Art of which he was so full.
Schober proposed that his new friend should live
with him; Franz's father — possibly not1 over-
satisfied with his son's performances as a teacher
of the alphabet to infants — consented to the plan,
and the two young men (Schober was some four
months Franz's junior) went off to keep house
together at Schober's lodgings in the Landkron-
gasse. A trace of this change is found on two
MS. songs in the Musik Verein at Vienna, ' Leiden
der Trennung ' and ' Lebenslied,' inscribed ' In
Herr v. Schober's lodging,' and dated Nov. 1816.
Schubert began to give a few lessons, but soon
threw them 2 up, and the household must have
been maintained at Schober's expense, since there
was obviously as yet no sale for Schubert's compo
sitions. He had good friends, as Beethoven had
had at the same age, though not so high in rank
— Hofrath von Kiesewetter, Matthaus von Collin,
Graf Moritz Dietrichstein, Hofrath Hammer von
Purgstall,Pyrker, afterwards Patriarch of Venice
and Archbishop of Erlau, Frau Caroline Pichler
— all ready and anxious to help him had they
had the opportunity. But Schubert never gave
them the opportunity. He was a true Viennese,
born in the lowest ranks, without either the art
or the taste for ' imposing ' on the aristocracy
(Beethoven's 3 favourite phrase) that Beethoven
had ; loving the society of his own class, shrink
ing from praise or notice of any kind, and with
an absolute detestation of teaching or any other
stated duties.
But to know him was to love and value him.
Three little events, which slightly diversify the
course of this year, are of moment as showing
the position which Schubert took amongst his ac
quaintances. The first was the 5Oth anniversary
of Salieri's arrival in Vienna, which he had en
tered as a boy on June 16, 1766. [See SALIERI,
Hi. 2186.] On Sunday, June 16, 1816, the old
Italian was invested with the Imperial gold
medal and chain of honour, in the presence of
the whole body of Court-musicians ; and in the
evening a concert took place at his own house, in
which, surrounded by his pupils, Weigl, Assmayer,
Anna Frohlich, Schubert, and many* others, both
1 There Is ground for this supposition.
2 Bauernfeld, W.Z.K. 3 imponiren. Thayer, ii. 318.
* There was a Liszt among Salieri's pupils at this time, but
hardly the future AbW, who was then but five years old. Franz Liszt
SCHUBERT.
825
male and female, he snuffed up the incense of his
worshippers, and listened to compositions in his
honour by his scholars past and present. Among
these were pieces sent by Hummel and Moscheles,
and a short cantata, both words and music by
Schubert.5
Eight days afterwards, on July 24, there was
another festivity in honour of the birthday of a
certain 6 Herr Heinrich Watteroth, a distin
guished official person, for which Schubert had
been employed to write a cantata on the subject
of Prometheus, words by Philipp Draxler, another
official person. The cantata has disappeared;
but from a description of it by Leopold Sonn-
leithner, communicated to ' Zellner's Blatter fiir
Theater,' etc. (no. 19), and reprinted7 separately,
it seems to have been written for two solo voices,
soprano (Gaa), and bass (Prometheus), chorus,
and orchestra, and to have contained a duet in
recitative, two choruses for mixed and one for male
voices (the disciples of Prometheus). This last is
described as having been in the form of a slow
march, with original and interesting treatment.
The performance took place in the garden of Wat-
teroth's house in the Erdberg suburb of Vienna.
As all the persons concerned in the festivity were
people of some consideration, and as the music was
very well received, it may have been an important
introduction for the young composer. A con
gratulatory poem by von Schlechta, addressed to
Schubert, appeared a day or two later in the
' Theaterzeitung.' Schubert had already, in the
previous year, set a song of Schlechta's — 'Auf
einem Kirchhof ' (Lief. 49, no. 2). and he promptly
acknowledged the compliment by adopting one
of more moment from Schlechta's ' Diego Manza-
nares,''Wo irrst du durch einsame Schatten?'
(40 Lieder, no. 25), his setting of which is dated
July 30, i8i6.8 Schubert evidently was fond
of his cantata. It was performed at Innspruck
by Gansbacher, and at Vienna by Sonnleithner
in 1819. Schubert wished to give it at -the
Augarten in 1820, and had sent it somewhere
for performance at the time of his death. He
was paid 100 florins, Vienna currency (or £4)
for it, and he notes in his journal that it was
the first time he had composed for money.
The third event was the composition of a cantata
on a larger scale than either of the others. It was
addressed to Dr. Joseph Spendou, in his character
of Founder and Principal of the Schoolmasters*
Widows' Fund, and contained 8 numbers, with
solos for two sopranos and bass, a quartet and
choruses, all with orchestral accompaniment.
Whether it was performed or not is uncertain,
and Schubert met once— In the curious collection of variations on
Diabelli's waltz, to which 50 Austrian composers contributed, Bee
thoven's contribution being the S3 variations, op. 120. Liszt's varia
tion is No. 24, and Schubert's No. 88. Liszt has been throughout an
indefatigable champion for Schubert.
5 The autograph of this little curiosity was sold In Paris, by auction.
May 14, 1881. The words are given by Kreissle, p. 82 (i. 83), but are
not worth quoting. They do not possess the individuality of thought
which makes Schubert's later verses so interesting, in spite of the
crudity of their expression.
6 His birthday was July 12, but the performance was put off on
account of the weather.
i I am indebted for this reprint to my ever-kind friend Mr. 0. F.
Pohl, of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, Vienna.
6 He returned to this poet in 1820, 1825, 1826, 1828.
326
SCHUBERT.
but it was published in 1830 in PF. score by
Diabelli, as op. 128. The other compositions of
the year 1816 are as numerous as usual. A fine
trio for S.S. A. and PF. to the words of
Klopstock's 'grosses Halleluja' (Lf. 41, no. 2);
a Salve Regina in F, to German words, for 4
voices and organ1 (Feb. 21, 1816) ; the Angels'
chorus from Faust, 'Christ ist erstanden,' 2 dated
June 1816 — are also among the printed works.
A Stabat Mater in F minor, to Klopstock's Ger
man words, dated Feb. 28, 1816, is still in MS.
It is written for soprano, tenor, and bass solo, and
chorus, and for an orchestra of the usual strings,
2 flutes, 2 oboes, 2 bassoons, i contra-bassoon,
2 horns, 3 trombones, 2 trumpets and drums.
These however are not uniformly employed : the
trumpets and drums only appear for a few chords
in Nos. 9 and 12 ; No. 5, an 8-part chorus, is
accompanied by the wind alone, and No. 6, a
tenor air, by the strings, with oboe solo. This
interesting looking work was performed in 1841
by the Musik-Verein of Vienna, and in 1863 at
the Altlerchenfelder church there, but has not
yet been published. Two other MS. works are a
Magnificat in C, for solos, chorus, and orchestra,
dated Oct. 1816, and a duet for soprano and
tenor with orchestra, to Latin words, 'Auguste
jam Ccelestium,' dated Sept. 1816, both much
tinctured by Mozart. There is also a ' Tantum
ergo' in C for 4 voices and orchestra, Aug. I Si 6,
and a fragment of a Requiem in Eb, July 1816 ;
the first pages are wanting, and it ends with the
2nd bar of the 2nd Kyrie.3
Of operas we find only one in 1816, probably
because only one libretto came in his way. It
is called ' Die Biirgschaft,' and is in 3 acts. The
author of the words is not known; and the quota
tions in Kreissle show that they are in great part
absolute rubbish. Schubert continued his task to
the 3rd act, 15 numbers, and there stopped. The
autograph, in Herr Dumba's possession, is dated
May 1816, and no portion of it is printed.
The Symphonies of 1816 are two — the 4th, in
C minor, * entitled 'Tragic Symphony/ and dated
April 1816; and the 5th, in Bb, for5 small or
chestra, dated Sept. 1816 — Oct. 3, 1816. The first
of ^ these — hardly ' tragic ' so much as ' pathetic '
— is a great advance on its predecessors; the
Andante is individual and very beautiful, and the
Finale wonderfully spirited. The other, though
full of Mozart, is as gay and untrammelled as all
Schubert's orchestral music of that day. It is
sometimes entitled 'without Trumpets or Drums,'
and is said to have been composed for the orchestra
at the Gundelhof, which grew out of the Schubert
Sunday afternoon quartets.6 Neither work has yet
1 Nottebohm's Catalogue, p. 226.
2 First printed by Schumann as Appendix to his newspaper the
N.Z.M., for June 18, 1839.
3 In Mr. Brahnis's possession. The date is quoted from the Cata
logue of the accurate Nbttebohm. I am bound to say that I saw no
date, and Mr. Brahms judged it to be later than 1816.
* April 3816.— Adagio molto and Allegretto vivace in C minor; An
dante in Ab ; Menuet and Trio in Eb ; Finale in C.— The autograph
has vanished.
5 Sept. 1816.— Fine den 3 Oct. 1816. Allegro Bt> ; Andante con moto
Eb; Menuet and Trio G minor and G major; Finale Allegretto
vivace Bb. Autograph with Peters & Co.
6 Hanslick, ' Concertwesen.' 142.
SCHUBERT.
been published in 7 score, but they have often been
played at the Crystal Palace, under Mr. Manns a
direction, and are among the favourite works in
the repertoire of that establishment. A string
quartet in F ; a string trio in Bb, apparently
very good ; a rondo in A for violin solo and quartet
(June 1816) ; a violin concerto in C ; 3 sonatinas
for PF. and violin (op. 137); a PF. sonata in F,
two movements of another in E ; various marches
for PF. ; i T. Deutsche (waltzes) ; 6 Ecossaises, with
the inscriptions ' Composed while a prisoner in
my room at Erdberg ' and 'Thank God'— pro
bably the relic of some practical joke — are still
existing.
Very little of the above, however interesting,
can be said to be of real, first-rate, permanent
value. But when we approach the songs of
i Si 6 the case is altered. There are not quite so
many with this date as there were with that of
1815, but there are 99 in all — 41 printed and 58
in MS. Of Goethe there are splendid specimens,
the three songs of the Harper, in ' Wilhelm Meis-
ter' (op. 12, Sept. 6), Mignon's ' Sehnsucht' song
(op. 62, no. 4) ; Der Fischer ; Der Ktinig in Thule
(op. 5, no. 5), Jagers Abendlied, and Schafers-
klagelied (op. 3), Wanderer's Nachtlied (op. 4),
Schwager Kronos (op. 19). Of Schiller there are
the beautiful Kitter Toggenburg, Thekla's song
(op. 58), etc., and to name only one other, the
far-famed ' Wanderer,' by Schmidt of Lubeck.
These magnificent pieces are well known to
every lover of Schubert, but they are not more
valued than such exquisitely simple and touching
little effusions as ' An eine Quelle ' of Claudius
(op. 109, no. 3), 'Der Abend ' of Kosegarten (op.
1 1 8, no. 2), or 'Der Leidende1 of Holty (Lief. 50,
no. 2), all equally bearing his stamp.
The lists of the songs of these two years throw
a curious light on Schubert's musical activity and
mode of proceeding. Dr. Johnson was said when
he got hold of a book to ' tear the heart out of
it,' and with Schubert it was very much the
same. To read a poem, and at once to fasten
upon it and transcribe it in music, seems to have
been his natural course ; and having done one
he went at once to the next. A volume of
Holty, or Claudius, or Kosegarten came into his
hands ; he tore from it in a moment what struck
him, and was not content with one song, but
must have three, four, or five. Thus, in Oct.
1815, he evidently meets with Kosegarten's
poems, and between the I5th and I9th sets
seven of them. In March 1816 he sets five
songs by Salis ; in May, six by Holty ; in No
vember, four by Claudius, three by Mayrhofer,
and so on. To read these lists gives one a kind
of visible image of the almost fierce eagerness
with which he attacked his poetry, and of the
inspiration with which the music rushed from
his heart and through his pen — ' everything that
he touched,' says Schumann, ' turning into music.'
Thus, at a later date, calling accidentally on
Randhartinger, and his friend being summoned
from the room, Schubert, to amuse himself in the
7 Except the Andante of the ' Tragic ' which is published in score bj
Peters, No. 1004.
SCHUBERT.
interval, took up a little volume which lay on the
table. It interested him ; and as his friend did
not return he carried it off with him. Anxious
for his book, Randhartinger called next morning
at Schubert's lodgings, and found that he had
already set several pieces in it to music.
The volume was Wilhelm M tiller's poems ; the
songs were part of the ' Schone Miillerin.' A
year or two after this, in July 1826 — it is his old
friend Doppler who tells the story — returning from
a Sunday stroll with some friends through the vil
lage of Warning^ he saw a friend sitting at a table
in the beer- garden of one of the taverns. The
friend, when they joined him, had a volume of
Shakespeare on the table. Schubert seized it,
and began to read; but before he had turned
over many pages pointed to 'Hark, hark, the
lark,' and exclaimed, ' Such a lovely melody has
eome into my head, if I had but some music
paper.' Some one drew a few staves on the
back of a bill of fare, and there, amid the hubbub
of the beer-garden, that beautiful song, so per
fectly fitting the words, so skilful and so happy
in its accompaniment, came into perfect existence.
Two others from the same poet not improbably
followed in the evening.1
It has been said that Schubert never heard
his Symphonies played. This is no doubt true
of the beautiful unfinished one in B minor, of
the Gastein Symphony, and of the great one in
C, no. 10 ; but of the first six it is not so correct.
There was always the pupils' band at the Convict,
where, as we have seen, parts in his handwriting
are said to have lingered ; and there was also a
flourishing amateur society, which, though their
execution may not have had the precision of first-
rate artists, yet probably played well enough to
enable a composer to judge if his effects were what
he intended them to be. Vienna amateurs were
by no means contemptible. A society who met
at the Mehlgrube even ventured on bringing out
Buch works as Beethoven's Overture to Coriolan
for the first time. Another, assembling at
the Romische Kaiser, performed the Mount of
Olives, Beethoven himself conducting.
It seems that the Quartet afternoons at the
house of Schubert the elder had gradually ex
tended themselves into performances of Haydn's
Symphonies, arranged as quartets and played
with doubled parts, players of ability and
name joined, and a few hearers were admitted.
After a time, the modest room became incon
veniently crowded, and then the little society
migrated to the house of a tradesman named
Frischling (Dorotheengasse 1105), wind instru
ments were added, and the smaller works of
Pleyel, Haydn, and Mozart were attacked.
In the winter of 1815 another move became
necessary, to the house of Otto Hatwig, one
of the violins of the Burgtheater, at the Schot-
tenthor, and in the spring of 1818, to his new
residence in the Gundelhof, and later still at
Pettenkofer's house in the Bauernmarkt. The
I The drinking-song from Antony and Cleopatra (marked ' WShring,
July 26'), and the lovely 'Sylvia' ('July 1826'). The anecdote Is In
Krelssle.
SCHUBERT.
327
band now contained some good professional
players, and could venture even on Beethoven's
two first symphonies, and the overtures of Cheru-
bini, Spontini, Boieldieu, Weigl, etc. Schubert
belonged to it all through, playing the viola, and
it was probably with the view to their perform
ance by the society that he wrote the two sym
phonies of 1816 (nos. 4 and 5), two overtures in
the winter of 1817, and his 6th symphony in the
spring of 1818.
Schober and Mayrhofer were Schubert.' s first
friends outside the immediate circle of his youth
ful associates. He was now to acquire a third,
destined to be of more active service than either
of the others. This was Vogl. He was 20 years
Franz's senior, and at the time of their meeting
was a famous singer at the Vienna Opera, ad
mired more for his intellectual gifts than for the
technical perfection of his singing, and really
great in such parts as Orestes in ' Iphigenie,'
Almaviva in 'Figaro,' Creon in 'Medea,' and
Telasko in the ' Vestalin.' About the year 1816
— the date is not precisely given — Vogl was
induced by Schober to come to their lodgings,
and see the young fellow of whom Schober was
always raving, but who had no access to any of
the circles which Vogl adorned and beautified by
his presence. The room as usual was strewed with
music. Schubert was confused and awkward ;
Vogl, the great actor and man of the world,
gay, and at his ease. The first song he took up
— probably the first music of Schubert's he had
ever seen — was Schubart's ' Augenlied ' (Lf. 50,
no. 3). He hummed it through, and thought
it melodious, but slight — which it is. ' Gany-
med ' and the ' Schaf ersklage ' made a deeper
impression ; others followed, and he left with the
somewhat patronising but true remark, 'There is
stuff in you ; but you squander your fine thoughts
instead of making the most of them.' But the
impression remained, he talked of Schubert with
astonishment, soon returned, and the acquaintance
grew and ripened till they became almost insepar
able, and until in their performances of Schubert's
songs, 'the two seemed,' in Schubert's own words,
' for the moment to be one.' In those days songs
were rarely if ever sung in concert -rooms ; but
Vogl had the entree to all the great musical
houses of Vienna, and before long his perform
ances of the Erl King, the Wanderer, Ganymed,
Der Kampf, etc., with the composer's accompani
ment, were well known. What Vogl's opinion of
him ultimately became, may be learnt from a pas
sage in his diary : — ' Nothing shows so plainly the
want of a good school of singing as Schubert's
songs. Otherwise, what an enormous and uni
versal effect must have been produced throughout
the world, wherever the German language is
understood, by these truly divine inspirations,
these utterances of a musical clairvoyance \ How
many would have comprehended, probably for
the first time, the meaning of such expressions as
'speech and poetry in music,' ' words in harmony/
'ideas clothed in music/ etc., and would have
learnt that the finest poems of our greatest poets
may be enhanced and even transcended when
328
SCHUBERT.
translated into musical language? Numberless
examples may be named, but I will only mention
The Erl King, Gretchen, Schwager Kronos, the
Mignon and Harper's songs, Schiller's Sehnsucht,
Der Pilgrim, and Die Burgschaft/
This extract shows how justly Vogl estimated
Schubert, and how, at that early date, his dis
cernment enabled him to pass a judgment which
even now it would be difficult to excel. The
word clairvoyance, too, shows that he thoroughly
entered into Schubert's great characteristic. In
hearing Schubert's compositions it is often as if
one \vere brought more immediately and closely
into contact with music itself than is the case
in the works of others; as if in his pieces
the stream from the great heavenly reservoir
were dashing over us, or flowing through us,
more directly, with less admixture of any medium
or channel, than it doe's in those of any other
writer — even of Beethoven himself. And this
immediate communication with the origin of
music really seems to have happened to him.
No sketches, no delay, no anxious period of
preparation, no revision, appear to have been
necessary. He had but to read the poem, to sur
render himself to the torrent, and to put down
what was given him to say, as it rushed through
his mind. This was the true ' inspiration of dic
tation,' as much so as in the utterance of any
Hebrew prophet or seer. We have seen one
instance in the case of the Erl King. The poem
of the Wanderer attracted him in the same way,
and the song was completed in one evening. In a
third case, that of Goethe's ' Rastlose Liebe,' the
paroxysm of inspiration was so fierce that Schu
bert never forgot it, but reticent as he often was,
talked of it years afterwards.1 It would seem that
the results did not always fix themselves in th e com
poser's memory as permanently as if they had been
the effect of longer and more painful elaboration.
Vogl2 tells an anecdote about this which is very
much to the point. On one occasion he received
from Schubert some new songs, but being other
wise occupied could not try them over at the
moment. When he was able to do so he was
particularly pleased with one of them, but as it
was too high for his voice, he had it copied in a
lower key. About a fortnight afterwards they
were again making music together, and Vogl
placed the transposed song before Schubert on
the desk of the piano. Schubert tried it through,
liked it, and said, in his Vienna dialect, ' I say !
the song's not so bad ; whose is it ?' so completely,
in a fortnight, had it vanished from his mind !
Sir Walter Scott attributed a song of his own to
Byron; but this was in 1828, after his mind had
begun to fail.3
1817 was comparatively an idle year. Its
great musical event was the arrival of Rossini's
music in Vienna. 'L'Inganno felice' was pro
duced at the Hof theatre, Nov. 26, 1816, and
'Tancredi,' Dec. 1 7 ; 'L'ltaliana in Algeri,' Feb. i,
1817, and 'Giro in Babilonia,' June 18 ; and the en
thusiasm of the Viennese — like that of all to whom
i Bauernfeld, W.Z.K. 2 In Kreissle, 119 (i. 123).
3 Lockhart's Life of Scott, vii. 129.
SCHUBERT.
these fresh and animated strains were brought —
knew no bounds. Schubert admired Rossini's
melody and spirit, but rather made fun of his
orchestral music, and a story is told — not impossi
bly 4 apocryphal — of his having written an over
ture in imitation of Rossini, before supper, after
returning from ' Tancredi.' At any rate he has
left two ' Overtures in the Italian style ' in D and
C, dated Sept.5 and Nov. 1817 respectively, which
were much played at the time. Schubert made
4-hand PF. arrangements of both, and that in 0
has been since published in score and parts as
op. 1 70, and has been played at the Crystal Palace
(Dec. i, 66, etc.) and elsewhere. Its caricature
of Rossini's salient points, including of course
the inevitable crescendo, is obvious enough ; but
nothing could transform Schubert into an Italian,
and the overture has individual and character
istic beauties which are immediately recognisable.
The influence of Rossini was no mere passing
fancy, but may be traced in the 6th Symphony,
mentioned below, and in music of his later life —
in the two Marches (op. 121), the Finale to the
Quartet in G (op. 161), and elsewhere.
A third Overture in D belongs to 1817, and
though still in MS., has also been played at the
Crystal Palace (Feb. 6, 69, etc.). It is in two move
ments, Adagio, and Allo. giusto, and the former
is almost a draft of the analogous movement in
the overture known as ' Rosamunde ' (op. 26),
though really the ' Zauberharfe.' There the re
semblance ceases. — What led Schubert to the
pianoforte this year in so marked a manner is
not known, but his devotion to it is obvious, for
no fewer than 6 sonatas belong to this period.
Of these, 3 are published — op. 122, in Eb ; op.
I47,6 inB (August) ; op. 164, in A minor.7 Those
still in MS. are in F, Ab, and E minor (June).
Schubert's 6th Symphony, in C,8 completed in
February 1 818, appears to have been begun in the
preceding October. It is the first one which he has
marked as ' Grand ' — 'Grosse Sinfonie ' — though
hardly with reason, as both in form and orchestra
it is the same as the early ones. It is an advance
on the others, and the Scherzo shows the first de
cided signs of Beethoven's influence. Passages
may also be traced to Rossini and the Italian opera.
The catalogue of the instrumental compositions
of this year closes with 2 sonatas for PF. and
violin, op. 137, nos. I (March) and 2 ; a string Trio9
and a Polonaise for the violin, both in MS. In the
number of the vocal compositions of 1817 there is
an equal falling off. Rossini's popularity for the
time shut the door against all other composers,
and even Schubert's appetite for bad librettos was
compelled to wait. Not only, however, are there
no operas this year, there is no church music, and
but 47 songs (32 printed, and 15 in MS.). In
quality, however, there is no deterioration in the
4 K.H. 129 (1. 133).
e Kreissle says May. September Is Mr. Nottebohm's date: but
there is another Overture In D, and it seems doubtful which of the
two is dated May, and which September.
fl Autograph in possession of 31r. Brahms.
i Published, by Spina, as '7th Sonata.'
8 Adagio and Allegro in 0 j Andante in F ; Scherzo In 0, and Trio
in E major ; Finale in 0.
9 In Bb. Played at the Monday Popular Concert of Feb. IB. 1869.
SCHUBEKT.
songs. The astonishing 'Gruppe aus dem Tar
tarus,' and the 'Pilgrim' of Schiller; the ' Gany-
med' of Goethe; the 'Fahrtzum Hades,' 'Mem-
non,' and ' Erlafsee ' of Mayrhofer ; and ' an die
Musik ' of Schober, are equal to any that come
before them. Among the MS. songs is one
showing the straits to which Schubert was some
times put, either by the want of materials or by
the sudden call of his inspiration. It is the
beginning of a setting of Schiller's ' Entziickung
an Laura,' and is written on the front page of
the 2nd violin part of a duet-fugue by Fux, the
words * Fuga. Duetto. Violino Secundo. Del :
Sing : l Fux.' appearing in the copyist's formal
handwriting through Schubert's hasty notes. It
is superscribed ' Entztickung an Laura Abschied
August 1817. Schubert Mpia' — interesting as
showing that in 'Abschied,' he has added his
own comment to Schiller's words ; that he dated
his pieces at the moment of beginning them;
and that he sometimes signed his name without
the ' Franz.'
His circle of intimate friends was increased
about this date by Anselm and Joseph Hiitten-
brenner and Joseph Gahy. Anselm, four years his
senior, was a pupil of Salieri's, and there they had
met in 1815. With the younger brother, Joseph,
he became acquainted in the summer of i8i7.2
Both were men of independent means, and An-
selm was a musician by profession. Gahy was
in the government employment, an excellent
pianoforte player, of whom Schubert was for long
very fond. The younger Hiittenbrenner was
bewitched by Schubert, much as Krumpholz and
Schindler were by Beethoven ; and was ever ready
to fetch and carry for his idol, and to praise
whatever he did, till the idol would turn on his
worshipper, and be so cruel as to get the nick
name of ' The Tyrant ' from the rest of the set.
How Schubert existed since he threw up his
place at the school and left his father's house
is a point on which we are in entire ignorance.
His wants were few, but how even those few
were supplied is a mystery. We have seen that
he lived rent-free with Schober for a few months
in 1816, but the return of Schober 's brother put
an end to the 3 arrangement, and from that date
he must have been indebted to Spaun, or some
friend better off than himself, for lodgings, for
existence, and for his visits to the theatre, for
there is no trace of his earning anything by
teaching in 1817, and the few pounds paid him
for the Watteroth cantata is the only sum which
he seems to have earned up to this date.
In the summer of 1818, however, on the recom
mendation of Unger, the father of Mad. Unger-
Sabatier, the great singer, Schubert accepted an
engagement as teacher of music in the family
of Count Johann Ester hazy, to pass the summer
at his country seat at Zele"sz, in Hungary, on -the
1 For ' Sign.' A facsimile is given by Beissmann.
* So Kreissle, 1. 128. But does not the dedication of the song, ' Die
Erwartung,' composed Feb. 27, 1815,— 'to his friend' J. H.— show
that the acquaintance was of much earlier date ? True, it was not
published till the April after Schubert's death ; and the song may
nave been prepared by him for publication shortly before, and the
oedication added then.
* K.H. 109 (i. 112).
SCHUBERT.
329
Waag, some distance east of Vienna, and the
winter in town. He was to be a member of the
establishment and to receive two gulden for every
lesson. The family consisted of the Count and
Countess, two daughters, Marie, 13, and Caro
line, u, and a boy of 5. All were musical.
The Count sang bass, the Countess and Caro
line contralto, Marie had a fine soprano, and
both daughters played the piano. Baron von
Schonstein, their intimate friend, slightly older
than Schubert, a singer of the highest qualities,
with a noble baritone voice, made up the party,
which certainly promised all the elements of
enjoyment. It was a pang to Schubert to part
from the circle of his companions, to whom he
was devoted, but it is not difficult to imagine
how pleasant he must have found the comfort
and generous living of the Esterhazy house,
while at the same time there would be oppor
tunities of retirement, and abundant means of
diversion in a beautiful country, a new people,
and the Hungarian and gipsy melodies.
When they left town does not appear.4 Schu
bert's Mass in 5C, his 4th, written like the
others, for Holzer, is dated 'July, 1818'; but
there is nothing to show whether it was finished
in Vienna or in the country. A set of MS. Sol
feggi for the Countess Marie, also dated July,
is perhaps evidence that by that time they were
settled at Zele*sz. Two letters to Schober are
printed by 6Bauernfeld, and are dated Aug. 3,
and Sept. 1 8, 1818. The first is addressed to his
home circle, his 'dearest fondest friends . . Spaun,
Schober, Mayrhofer, and Senn . . . you who are
everything to me.' There are messages also to
Vogl, and to Schober's mother and sister, and to
' all possible acquaintances,' and an urgent en
treaty to write soon — ' every syllable of yours is
dear to me.' He is thoroughly well and happy, and
' composing like a god. . . Mayrhofer 's Einsam-
keit is ready, and I believe it to be the best thing
I have yet done, for I was without anxiety* (ohne
Sorge — the italics are his own). 'Einsamkeit'
(Lf. 32) is a long ballad, filling 19 close pages of
print, with a dozen changes of tempo and as many
of signature ; perhaps not quite coming up to his
own estimate of it, though both words and music
are often very striking. The length of this and
other ballads will probably always hinder their
wealth of melody, dramatic effects, and other
striking beauties, from being known by the world
at large.
The other letter, seven weeks later, throws more
light on his position at Zelesz, 'as composer,
manager, audience, everything, in one.' ' No one
here cares for true Art, unless it be now and then
the Countess ; so I am left alone with my be
loved, and have to hide her in my room, or my
* There is an Interesting autograph copy of the 'Forelte' song
dated at A. Huttenbrenner's Lodgings (in Vienna) midnight Feb. 21.
1818, and besprinkled with ink Instead of sand. It has been published
in photography. But the ' Forelle ' really dates from 1817. (Notte-
bohm, in the Them. Catalogue.)
B Published in 1826 as op. 48. Schubert wrote a new and most
beautiful Benedictus to it in 1828, only a few months before his
death.
' 6 m • Die Presse.' Vienna, Ap. 17. 1869. Reprinted in the ' gignale,'
Nov. 16. 1869.
330
SCHUBERT.
piano, or my own breast. If this often makes
me sad, on the other hand it often elevates me all
the more. Several songs have lately come into
existence, and I hope very successful ones.' He
is evidently more at home in the servants' hall
than the drawing-room. 'The cook is a pleasant
fellow ; the ladies'-maid is thirty ; the housemaid
very pretty, and often pays me a visit; the
nurse is somewhat ancient ; the butler is my
rival ; the two grooms get on better with the
horses than with us. The Count is a little rough ;
the Countess proud, but not without heart ; the
young ladies good children. I need not tell you,
who know me so well, that with my natural
frankness I am good friends with everybody.'
The letter ends with an affectionate message
to his parents.
The only songs which can be fixed to this
autumn, arid which are therefore doubtless those
just referred to, besides the great ' Einsamkeit,'
are the 'Blumenbrief ' (Lief. 21, no. i), 'Blon-
del und Maria,' 'Das Marienbild' and 'Litaney,'
' Das Abendroth ' — for a contralto, evidently
composed for the Countess ; ' Vom Mitleiden
Maria,' and three Sonnets from Petrarch (MS.).
The Hungarian national songs left their mark
in the ' 36 original dances/ or ' First Waltzes '
(op. 9), some of which were written down in
the course of the next year. The ' Divertisse
ment a la hongroise,' and the Quartet in A minor
(op. 29), in which the Hungarian influence is so
strong, belong — the first apparently, the second
certainly — to a much later period.
A third letter of this date, hitherto unprinted,
with which the writer has been honoured by the
granddaughter1 of Ferdinand Schubert, to whom
it was addressed, is not without interest, and is
here printed entire. The Requiem referred to
'was by Ferdinand, and had evidently been sent
to his brother for revision. The letter throws
a pleasant light on the strong link existing be
tween Franz and his old home, and suggests that
assistance more solid than 'linen' may often
have reached him from his fond step-mother
in his poverty in Vienna. In considering the
pecuniary result of the engagement, it must be
remembered that the florin was at that time only
worth a franc, instead of two shillings. The
month's pay therefore, instead of being £20, was
really only about £8. Still, for Schubert that
was a fortune.
DEAR BROTHER FERDINAND,
24 Aug. 1818.
It is half- past 11 at night, and your Kequiem is
ready. It has made me sorrowiul-as you may believe,
for I sang it with all my heart. What is wanting you
can fill in, and put the words under the music and the
signs above. And if you want much rehearsal you must
do it yourself, without asking me in Zetesz. Things are
not going well with you ; I wish you could change with
me, so that for once you might be happy. You should
find all your heavy burdens gone, dear brother ; I heartily
wish it could be so. — My foot is asleep, and I am mad with
it. If the fool could only write it wouldn't go to sleep !
Good morning, my boy, I have been asleep with my
foot, and now go on with my letter at 8 o'clock on the 25th.
I have one request to make in answer to yours. Give
i Frfiuleln Caroline Geisler, daughter of Linus Geisler and Fer
dinand's second daughter, Elise.
SCHUBERT.
my love to my dear parents, brothers, sisters, friends, and
acquaintances, especially not forgetting Carl. Didn't
he mention me in his letter ? As for my friends in the
town, bully them, or get some one to bully them -well, till
they write to me. Tell my mother that my linen is
•well looked after, and that I am well off, thanks to
her motherly care. If I could have some more linen
I should very much like her to send me a second
batch of pocket-handkerchiefs, cravats, and stockings.
Also I am much in want of two pair of kerseymere
trowsers. Hart can get the measure wherever he likes.
I would send the money very soon. For July, with the
journey-money, I got 200 florins.
It is beginning already to be cold, and yet we shall
not start for Vienna before the middle of October. Next
month I hope to have a few weeks at Freystadt, which
belongs to Count Erdody, the uncle of my count. The
country there is said to be extraordinarily beautiful.
Also I hope to get to Pesth while we are at the vintage
at Bpsczniedj, which is not far off. It would be delight
ful if I should happen to meet Herr Administrator
Taigele there. I am delighted at the thought of the
vintage, for I have heard so much that is pleasant about
it. The harvest also is beautiful here. They don't stow
the corn into barns as they do in Austria, but make
immense heaps out in the fields, which they call Tristen.
They are often 80 to 100 yards long, and 30 to 40 high
and are laid together so cleverly that the rain all runs on
without doing any harm. Oats and so on they bury in the
ground.
Though I am so well and happy, and every one so good
to me, yet I shall he immensely glad when the moment
arrives for going to Vienna. Beloved Vienna, all that is
dear and valuable to me is there, and nothing but the
actual sight of it will stop my longingl Again entreating
you to attend to all my requests, I remain, with much love
to all, your true and sincere,
FRANZ Mpia.
A thousand greetings to your good wife and dear Eesi,
and a very hearty one to aunt Schubert and her daughter.
The inscription 'Zele'sz, Nov. 1818' on the
song ' Das Abendroth' shows that the return to
Vienna was not till nearly the end of the year.
He found the theatre more than ever in posses
sion of Rossini. To the former operas, 'Elisabetta'
was added in the autumn, and ' Otello ' early in
Jan. 1819. But one of the good traits in Schu
bert's character was his freedom from jealousy,
and his determination to enjoy what was good,
from whatever quarter it came, or however much
it was against his own interest. A letter of his to
Hiittenbrenner, written just after the production
of ' Otello,' puts this in very good light. 'Otello
is far better and more characteristic than Tan-
credi. Extraordinary genius it is impossible to
deny him. His orchestration is often most origi
nal, and so is his melody ; and except the usual
Italian gallopades, and a few reminiscences of
Tancredi, there is nothing to object to.' But he
was not content to be excluded from the theatre
by every one, and the letter goes on to abuse the
' canaille of Weigls and Treitschkes,' and ' other
rubbish, enough to make your hair stand on end,
all which were keeping his operettas off the
boards. Still, it is very good-natured abuse, and
so little is he really disheartened, that he ends
by begging Hiittenbrenner for a libretto; nay,
he had actually just completed a little piece
called 'Die Zwillingsbriider ' ('the Twins'),
translated by Hofmann from the French— a
Singspiel in one act, containing an overture
and 10 numbers. He finished it on Jan. 19, 1819,
and it came to performance before many months
were over.
Of his daily life at this time we know nothing.
We must suppose that he had regular duties
with ius pupils at the Esterhazys' town house.
SCHUBERT.
but there is nothing to say so. We gather1
that he joined Mayrhofer in his lodgings, 420
in the Wipplingerstrasse, early in the year.
It was not a prepossessing apartment. ' The
lane was gloomy ; both room and furniture were
the worse for wear ; the ceiling drooped ; the
light was shut out by a big building opposite —
a worn-out piano, and a shabby bookcase.' The
only relief is the name of the landlady — Sans-
souci, a Frenchwoman. No wonder that Mayr-
hofer's poems — he was ten years Schubert's
senior — were of a gloomy cast.
The two friends were on the most intimate
terms, and addressed each other by nicknames.
What Mayrhofer's appellation may have been
we do not know, but Schubert, now and later,
was called 'the Tyrant,' for his treatment of
Hiittenbrenner ; also 'Bertl,' 'Schwammerl,' and,
best of all, ' Kanevas ' — because when a stranger
came into their circle his first question always
was, ' Rann er was ? ' ' Can he do anything ? '
Their humour took all sorts of shapes, and odd
stories are told of their sham fights, their howls,
their rough jokes and repartees.2 Mayrhofer was
a Government employe", and went to his office
early, leaving his fellow-lodger behind. Schubert
began work directly he awoke, and even slept in
his spectacles to save trouble ; he got at once to
his writing, sometimes in bed, but usually at his
desk. It was so still, when Hiiler3 called on
him eight years later. ' Do you write much ? '
said the boy, looking at the manuscript on the
standing desk — they evidently knew little in
North Germany of Schubert's fertility. ' I com
pose every morning, was the reply; and when
one piece is done, I begin another.' And yet this
was the musicien le plus poete que jamais — it
might have been the answer of a mere Czerny !
Add to this a trait, communicated to the writer
by Schubert's friend, Franz Lachner, of Munich,
that when he had completed a piece, and heard
it sung or played, he locked it up in a drawer,
and often never thought about it again.
This close work went on till dinner-time — two
o'clock — after which, as a rule, lie was free for the
day, and spent the remainder either in a country
walk with friends, or in visits — as to Sofie Miiller,
and Mad. Lacsny Buchwieser, whom we shall en
counter further on ; or at Schober's rooms, or
some coffee-house — in his later days it was Bog-
ner's Caft; in the Singerstrasse, where the droll
cry of a waiter was a never-ending pleasure to
him. But no hour or place was proof against the
sudden attack of inspiration when anything hap
pened to excite it. An instance occurs at this very
time, Nov. 1819, in an overture for 4 hands in F
(°P- 34). which he has inscribed as * written in
Joseph Hiittenbrenner's room at the City Hos
pital in the inside of three hours ; and dinner
missed in consequence.' * If the weather was fine
he would stay in the country till late, regardless
' In a letter to Mayrhofer from Linz, dated Aug. 19, 1819, he says,
' Let the bearer have my bed while he stays with you.' K.H. 159
(i. IfiO). The bed must have been his before he left town.
2 K.H. 61 (i. 51). 3 in Hiller's ' Kiinstlerleben/ p. 49.
< K.H. 160 (i. 162).
SCHUBERT.
331
of any engagement that he might have made in
town.
The only compositions that can be fixed to
the spring of 1819 are 5 songs dated February,
and one dated March ; a very fine quintet for
equal voices, to the 'Sehnsucht' song in ' Wilhelm
Meister' — a song which he had already set for a
single voice in 1816, and was to set twice more
in the course of his life (thus rivalling Beethoven,
who also set the same words four times) ; an
equally fine quartet for men's voices, ' Ruhe,
schonstes Gliick der Erde,' dated April ; and four
sacred songs by Novalis, dated May.
The earnings of the previous summer allowed
him to make an expedition this year on his own
account. Mayrhofer remained in Vienna, and
Vogl and Schubert appear to have gone together
to Upper Austria. Steyr was the first point in
the journey, a town beautifully situated on the
Enns, not far south of Linz. They reached it
early in July ; it was Yogi's native place, and
he had the pleasure of introducing his friend
to the chief amateurs of the town, Paumgartner,
Roller, Dornfeld, Schellmann — substantial citi
zens of the town, with wives and daughters,
' Pepi Roller,' 4 Frizi Dornfeld,' ' the eight Schell
mann girls,' etc., who all welcomed the musician
with real Austrian hospitality, heard his songs
with enthusiasm, and themselves helped to make
music with him. His friend Albert Stadler was
there also with his sister Kathi. How thoroughly
Schubert enjoyed himself in this congenial bour
geois society, and in such lovely country — he
mentions its beauties each time he writes — we
have ample proof in two letters.5 Among other
drolleries the Erl King was sung with the parts
distributed amongst Vogl, Schubert, and Pepi
Roller. Perhaps too Schubert gave them his
favourite version of it on a comb. Vogl's birth
day (Aug. 10) was celebrated by a cantata in C,
containing a terzet, 2 soprano and 2 tenor solos,
and a finale in canon, pointed by allusions to his
various operatic triumphs, words by Stadler, and
music by Schubert.6 After this the two friends
strolled on to Linz, the home of the Spauns, and
of Renner and Ottenwald, whose verses Franz
had set in his earlier days ; and thence perhaps
to Salzburg, returning to Steyr about the end of
the month. Nor did the joviality of these good
Austrians interfere with composition. Besides
the impromptu cantata just mentioned, the well-
known PF. quintet (op. 114), in which the air
of ' Die Forelle ' is used as the theme of the
Andantino, was written at Steyr, possibly as a
commission from the good Paumgartner, and was
performed by the Paumgartner party. Schubert
achieved in it the same feat which is somewhere
ascribed to Mozart, of writing out the separate
parts without first making a score, and no doubt
played the pianoforte part by heart. The date of
their departure, Sept. 14, is marked by an entry
in the album of Miss Stadler, when Schubert de
livered himself of the following highly correct
sentiment: — 'Enjoy the present so wisely, that
5 K.H. 158-159 (i. 159, 160).
6 Published to other words, ' Herrlich prang*,' as op. 158.
332
SCHUBERT.
the past may be pleasant to recollect, and the
future not alarming to contemplate.' This may
pair off with a sentence written by Mozart, in
English, in the Album of an English Freemason,
which has not yet been printed : — ' Patience and
tranquility of mind contribute more to cure our
distempers as the whole art of medicine. Wien,
den 3Ote Marz I787.'1
A few days more saw them again settled in
Vienna. Each of the two letters preserved from
the journey contains an obvious allusion to some
love affair ; but nothing is known of it. He could
hardly have adopted a more effectual diversion
from such sorrows than the composition of a
mass, on an extended scale ; that namely in Ab
— his 5th — which he began this month under
the serious title of ' Missa Solemnis ' ; but he seems
to have dawdled over it more than over any other
of his works ; as it was not finished till Sept.
1822, and contains many marks of indecision.
The most pregnant musical event of this year
is the fact that on Feb. 28, 1819, a song of
Schubert's was sung in public — the 'Schafers
Klagelied,' sung by Jager at Jail's concert, at
5 p.m. at the ' Romische Kaiser,' Vienna. It was
Schubert's first appearance before the public in
any capacity, and is noticed by the Leipzig A. M. Z.
in these terms : — ' Goethe's Schafers Klagelied set
to music by Herr Franz Schubert — the touching
and feeling composition of this talented young
man was sung by Herr Jager in a similar spirit.'
Such is the first utterance of the press on one
who has since evoked so much enthusiasm ! In
the course of this year Schubert appears to have
forwarded the three songs, 'Sch wager Kronos,'
' Ueber Thai ' (Mignon), and ' Ganymed,' — after
wards published as op. 19, — to Goethe; but no
notice was taken by the poet of one who was to
give some of his songs a wider popularity than
they could otherwise have enjoyed, a popularity
independent of country or language; nor does
Schubert's name once occur in all the 6 vols. of
Goethe's correspondence with Zelter.2
1820 was again a year of great activity.
Owing to Vogl's influence, Schubert was gra
dually attracting the attention of the managers.
The ' Zwillingsbriider ' had been written for the
Karnthnerthor theatre (see p. 330 5), and it was
not long before the regisseur of the rival opera-
house, the Theatre an-der-Wien, suggested to him
a libretto called the 'Zauberharfe,' or 'Magic
harp,' a melodrama in 3 acts, by the same
Hofmann who had translated the former piece.
To receive such a proposal and to act upon it
was a matter of course with Schubert, and the
'Zauberharfe' is said to have been completed
in a fortnight.3 But before this, early in the
year, he had met with the works of A. H.
Niemeyer, Professor of Theology at Halle, and
had adopted the poem of ' Lazarus, or the Feast
of the Resurrection ' for an Easter Cantata.
Easter fell that year on April 2, and his work is
dated ' February,' so that he was in ample time.
1 I owe this to my good friend Mr. Pohl, of Vienna.
2 Search should be made in the Goethe Archiv at Weimar for the
autograph of these songs, and the letter which doubtless accompanied
them. 3 Autograph in Herr Dumba's collection.
SCHUBERT.
The poem— or drama, for there are seven distinct
characters — is in three parts. I. The sickness and
death. 2. The burial and elegy. 3. The resur
rection. Of these the ist and a large portion of
the 2nd were completed by Schubert, apparently
without the knowledge of any of his friends.
Ferdinand mentions the first part in his list,*
but the existence of the second was unknown,
till, through the instrumentality of Mr. Thayer,
it was unearthed in 1861. These have been
5 published, but no trace of the 3rd act has yet
been found, and the work was not performed till
long after the composer's death — viz. in 1863.
On June 14 the 'Zwillingsb ruder' or 'Zwil-
linge ' was produced at the Karnthnerthor theatre.
It is a comic operetta ('Posse'), with spoken
dialogue, in one act, containing an overture and
10 numbers, and turns on the same plot that has
done duty in ' Box and Cox ' and a dozen other
farces, the confusion between two twin-brothers,
who were both acted by Vogl. The overture
was encored on the first night, and Vogl's two
songs were much applauded, but the piece was
virtually a fiasco, and was withdrawn after
six representations. Schubert took so little
interest in its production that, like Mendelssohn
at the ' Wedding of Camacho,' he did not even
stay in the house, and Vogl had to appear
instead of him in front of the curtain. The
libretto, though overburdened with characters,
is sadly deficient in proportion, and contains very
little action. Schubert's music, on the other
hand, is light, fresh, and melodious, pointed,
unusually compact, and interesting throughout.
In the concerted numbers there is evidence of
great dramatic power. To condemn it, as the
critics of the day do, as wanting in melody, and
constantly striving after originality, is to con
tradict Schubert's most marked characteristics,
and is contrary to the facts. There is possibly
more justice in the complaint that the accom
paniments were too loud, though that is cer
tainly not the fault in his masses, his only other
published works with orchestral accompaniments
anterior to this date. The work has been pub
lished in vocal score by Peters (1872).
On August 19 the Zauberharfe was produced
at the Theatre an-der-Wien. It is said to con
sist chiefly of chorus and melodrama, with only
a few solos, among them a romance for tenor
which was highly praised. There is a fine over
ture (in 0), original, characteristic, and full of
beauty, which was published before 1828 as pp.
26, under the name of 'Rosamunde,' to which
it seems to have no 6 claim. The piece was occa
sionally brought forward till the winter, and was
then dropped. These three vocal works^ appear
so far to have whetted Schubert's appetite that
in the autumn he attacked the more important
libretto of ' Sakontala,' a regular opera in 3 acts,
by P. H. Neumann, founded on the Indian drama
of that name. He sketched 2 acts, and there it
remains ; the MS. is in Herr Dumba's possession.
< N.Z.M. 139 a. « In 1866, by Spina.
e The overture played to the Kosamunde music is in D minor, an
•was afterwards published as ' Alfonso & Estrella.' There is perna
another in existence. See the letter to von Mosel quoted further on.
SCHUBERT.
Another important and very beautiful piece is
the 23rd l Psalm, set for 2 sopranos and 2 altos
with PF. accompaniment, at the instigation of
the sisters Frohlich, and dated at the beginning
'23 Dec. 1820' — perhaps with a view to some
private concerts given, now or later, at the old
hall of the Musikverein. Another is the ' Gesang
der Geister uber denWassern' of Goethe (op. 167).
This fine and mystical poem had a strong attrac
tion for Schubert. He set it for 4 equal voices in
1817 ; then he reset it for 4 tenors and 4 basses
with 2 violas, 2 cellos, and bass, in Dec. 1820 ; and
lastly revised this in Feb. 1821. It was first pro
duced on March 7, 1821, and found no favour, to
Schubert's disgust. It was again performed on
March 30, before a more receptive audience,
with a far better result. It was revived at
Vienna in 1858 by Herbeck, and in England
was performed with success on March 22, 1881,
under the direction of Mr. Prout. It is enor
mously difficult, and, though perfectly in cha
racter with the poem, will probably never be
attractive to a mixed audience. Another work
of 1820 were some antiphons (op. 113) for Palm
Sunday (March 26), composed for Ferdinand,
who had been recently appointed Choirmaster at
the Altlerchenfelder Church, and found the duties
rather too much for him. They are written with
black chalk, on coarse gray wrapping-paper ; and
the tradition is that they and two motets were
written in great haste, just in time for the service.
On Easter Sunday Franz attended and conducted
the mass for his brother.
The Fantasie in C for PF. solo (op. 15), con
taining Variations on Schubert's own ' Wanderer/
is probably a work of this year. It was written
for von Liebenberg, a PF. player, to whom Schu
bert dedicated it. This fine piece has lately been
brought into vogue by Liszt's arrangement of it
for PF. and orchestra as a concerto ; but it is
doubtful if it is improved by the process. Schu
bert never could play it ; he always stuck fast in
the last movement; and on one occasion jumped
up and cried ' let the devil himself play it ! '
Another piece is an Allegro for strings in C minor,
dated Dec. 1820, the first movement of a quartet,
of which there exist besides 41 bars of the An
dante, in Ab. The Allegro is of first-rate quality,
and Schubert in every bar. It was published in
1868 by Senff. The MS. is in Mr. Brahms's fine
collection of autographs.
The songs of 1820, 17 in all, though not so nu
merous as those of previous years, are very fine.
They contain ' Der Jungling auf dem Hugel' (op.
8, no. i), 'Der Schiffer' (Lf. 33, no. i), 'Liebes-
lauschen' (Lf. 15, no. 2), 3 grand songs to Mayr-
hofer's words, 'Orest auf Tauris,' 'Der entsuhnte
Orest,' and 'Freiwilliges Versinken ' (Lf. 1 1), and
4 Italian Canti, written for Frl. von Romer, who
afterwards married Schubert's friend Spaun, and
since published with one which was probably
written under Salieri's eye as early as 1813. The
most remarkable of all is 'Im Walde' or ' Waldes-
nacht' (Lf. 16), a very long song of extraordinary
beauty, variety, force, and imagination.
l To Moses Mendelssohn's translation. <
333
SCHUBERT.
With February 1821 Schubert entered his sp
year, and it was a good omen to receive such
a birthday present as the three testimonials of
this date which Kreissle has 2 preserved. The
first is from von Mosel, then Court Secretary;
the second from Weigl, Director of the Court
Opera, Salieri, and von Eichthal ; the third from
Moritz Count Dietrichstein, whom Beethoven
addresses as ' Hofmusikgraf,' and who appears
to have been a sort of Jupiter-Apollo with
general sway over all Court music. These in
fluential personages warmly recognise his emi
nent ability, industry, knowledge, feeling, and
taste, and profess the best intentions towards
him. The three documents were enclosed by the
Count in a letter to Vogl, full of good wishes
for the future of his friend. Still more grati
fying was the prospect, which now at last opened,
of the publication of his songs. It was the first
good epoch in Schubert's hitherto struggling
life. He had now been writing for more than
seven years, with an industry and disregard of
consequences which are really fearful to contem
plate ; and yet, as far as fame or profit were
concerned, might almost as well have remained
absolutely idle. Here at length was a break in
the cloud. It was not less welcome because
it was mainly due to his faithful friends, the
Sonnleithners, who had made his acquaintance
through the accident of Leopold Sonnleithner's
being at school with him, and ever since che
rished it in the most faithful and practical
way, Ignaz, the father, having, since 1815,
had large periodical music-meetings of artists
and amateurs in his house at the Gundelberg,
which were nothing less than Schubert pro
paganda. Here, before large audiences of tho
roughly musical people, Schubert's pieces were
repeatedly performed, and at length, on Dec. I,
1820, the 'Erl King' was sung by Gymnich, a
well-known amateur, with a spirit which fired
every one of the audience with the desire to
possess the song, and appears to have suggested
to Leopold and Gymnich the possibility of find
ing a publisher for the inspirations which had
for so long been their delight and astonishment.
They applied to Diabelli and Haslinger, the
leading houses of Vienna, but without success ;
the main objections being the insignificance of
the composer, and the difficulty of his PF. ac
companiments. On this they resolved to take
the matter into their own hands ; and, probably
not without misgivings, had the ' Erl King ' en
graved. The fact was announced at the next
Concert at the Gundelberg, and a hundred copies
were at once subscribed for in the room — suf
ficient to defray the cost of the engraving and
printing, and of engraving a second song as
well. Meantime the ' Erl King ' had been sung
in public (for the concerts at the Gundelberg
were, strictly speaking, private, limited to the
friends of the host) by Gymnich, at an evening
concert of the Musikverein, in one of the public
rooms of the city, on Jan, 25, 1821, Schubert
himself appearing on the platform, and playing
2 K.H. 201 (I. 203).
334
SCHUBERT.
the accompaniment. Everything was done by
the young enthusiasts to foster the Schubert
furore, even to the publication of a set of
' Erl King waltzes' by A. Huttenbrenner, which
at any rate must have made the name familiar,
though they provoked Schubert, and drew from
him some satirical hexameters and pentameters
which may be read in Kreissle.1 On Feb. 8 the
programme of the Musikverein Conceit included
three songs of his, the ' Sehnsucht ' by Schiller,
'Gretchen am Spinnrade,' and 'Der Jiingling
auf dem Hiigel ' ; and on March 8 the ' Gruppe
aus dem Tartarus.' On March 7 the 'Erl King'
was again sung, this time by Vogl himself, at
an unmistakeable public concert, at the Kiirnth-
nerthor theatre, a concert supported by all the
most distinguished ladies of the Court, who
received the song with loud applause. Think
what the first appearance of these godlike
pieces must have been ! It was the rising of
the Sun! He is now an every-day sight to us;
but how was it the first time that he burst in
all his brightness on the eyes of mortals ? In
the midst of all this enthusiasm the ' Erl King '
was published on the 1st of April, 1821, by
Cappi and Diabelli, on commission. It was
dedicated to Count Moritz Dietrichstein, whose
kindness well deserved that recognition. On
April 30, ' Gretchen am Spinnrade ' appeared
as op. 2. The succeeding publications — each
made to depend on the success of the last —
were as follows: —
May 29. Op. 3. Schafers Klagelied ; Meeres-
Stille ; Heidenroslein ; Jagers Abend-
lied.
Do. Op. 4. Der Wanderer ; Morgenlied ;
Wanderers Nachtlied.
July 9. Op. 5. .Rastlose Liebe; Nahe des
Geliebten ; Der Fischer ; Erster Ver-
lust ; Der Kb'nig in Thule.
•A-Ug. 23. Op. 6. Memnon; Antigone und
Oedip ; Am Grabe Anselmos.
Nov. 27. Op. 7. Die abgebliihte Linde ; Der
Flug der Zeit; Der Tod und das
Madchen.
Here the publication by commission stopped,
the Diabellis being evidently convinced that the
risk might be profitably assumed ; and accord
ingly op. 8 appears on May 9, 1822, as 'the
property of the publishers.' The dedications of
the first seven numbers no doubt furnish the
names of Schubert's most influential supporters :
I. Graf von Dietrichstein; 2. Reichsgraf Moritz
von Fries ; 3. Ignaz von Mosel ; 4. Johann La-
dislaus Pyrker, Patriarch of Venice ; 5. Salieri ;
6. Michael Vogl ; 7. Graf Lud wig Sze'che'nyi. It
must be admitted that the above are very good
lists, and that if Schubert had waited long
for the publication of his works, the issue of
twenty songs in eight months, under the patron
age of seven such eminent personages, was a
substantial compensation. We do not hear, how
ever, that much money came into his hands from
the publication. The favourable impression
made by the publication may be gathered from
l Hauslick, ' Concertwesen,' 284 ; and K. H. 60 (1. 60).
SCHUBERT.
the long, intelligent, and sympathetic criticism,
' Blick auf Schuberts Lieder,' by F. von Hentl,
which appeared in the ' Wiener Zeitschrift fur
Kunst/etc. — a periodical belonging to Diabelli's
rivals, Steiner & Co. — for March 23, 1822.
Schubert was now a good deal about the
theatre, and when it was determined to produce
a German version of Harold's ' Clochette/ as ' Das
Zauberglb'ckchen,' at the Court-opera, he was
not unnaturally called upon to insert a couple of
pieces to suit the Vienna audience. It was what
Mozart often did for the Italian operas of his day
—what indeed we know Shakspeare to have done
in more than one case. The opera was produced
on June 20. The interpolated pieces were a
long air for tenor, 2 in 3 movements — Maestoso,
Andante, and Allegro — full of passion and ima
gination, and a comic duet (said to be very
comic) between the princes B flat and C natural
(Bedur and Cedur). They were more applauded
than anything else in the work, but Schubert's
name was not divulged ; the opera as a whole
did not please, and was soon withdrawn.
The little Variation which he contributed,
as no. 38, to Diabelli's collection of 50 Varia
tions — the same for which Beethoven wrote
his 33 (op. 120) — should not be overlooked.
Though not published till 1823, the autograph,
now in the Hofbibliothek at Vienna, is dated
'March 1821.' The variation is fresh and
pretty, in the minor of the theme, but is more
noticeable from its situation than from its own
qualities. A few dances for PF. solo are
dated ' 8th March ' and ' July ' in this year, and
a collection of 36, containing those alluded to,
and others of 1816 and 1819, was published by
Cappi and Diabelli on Nov. 29, as op. 18. Some
of these are inscribed in the autograph 'Atzen-
brucker Deutsche, July 1821,' indicating a visit
to Atzenbruck, the seat of an uncle of Schober's,
near Abstetten, between Vienna and St. Pb'lten,
where a three days' annual festivity was held, to
which artists of all kinds were invited, and where
Schubert's presence and music were regarded as
indispensable.
Whether after this he and Schober returned
to Vienna we know not, no letters remain ; but
the next event of which any record remains is
the composition of a Symphony, his seventh,
in E, which is marked, without note of place,
as begun in August. He did not complete the
writing of it, and indeed it is probable that it
did not occupy him more than a few hours ; but
the autograph, which is in the writer's posses
sion,3 is a very curious manuscript, probably
quite unique, even among Schubert's feats of
composition. It occupies 167 pages of 42 sheets,
(10 quires of 4, and i of 2), and is in the usual
movements — Adagio in E minor, and Allegro in
E major ; Andante in A ; Scherzo in C, and Trio
in A ; and Allegro giusto in E major. The
Introduction and a portion of the Allegro are
fully scored and marked; but at the iioth bar
2 Introduced Into 'Alfonso und Estrella' in 1881 by Joh. Fuchs.
3 I received it in 1868 from the late Paul Mendelssohn, Felli'i
brother, into whose hands it came after his brother's death. Felix
Mendelssohn had it from Ferdinand Schubert direct.
SCHUBERT.
— the end of a page — Schubert appears to Lave
grown impatient of this regular proceeding, and
from that point to the end of the work has
made merely memoranda. But these memo
randa are, in their way, perfectly complete and
orderly to the end of the Finale. Every bar
is drawn-in ; the tempi and names of the instru
ments are fully written at the beginning of each
movement ; the nuances are all marked ; the
very double bars and flourishes are gravely
added at the end of the sections, and * Fine ' at
the conclusion of the whole ; and Schubert evi
dently regarded the work as no less complete
on the paper than it was in his mind. And
complete it virtually is; for each subject is
given at full length, with a bit of bass or accom
paniment-figure, or/ugato passage. There is not a
bar from beginning to end that does not contain
the part of one or more instruments ; at all crucial
places the scoring is much fuller ; and it would no
doubt be possible to complete it as Schubert him
self intended. It is said that Mendelssohn con
templated doing so, but this is probably a mere
legend, and Mendelssohn was too practical to
give his time to a work which at the best could
only be regarded as a curiosity. Though con
taining much that is original, and as deeply
imbued throughout with melody and spirit as
any of the preceding six, this symphony is,
like them, virtually a work of the old school,
and it required another year before Schubert
could break with the past, and in the two move
ments of his unfinished 8th Symphony in B minor,
and the great Entr'acte to ' Rosamunde,' in the
same key, appear in the orchestra in his own
individual and native shape, as he had done in
the Song so many years before.1
We next find the two friends at the castle of
Ochsenburg, a few miles south of St. Polten, the
seat of the Bishop, who was a relative of Schober's ;
and there and in St. Polten itself they passed
a thoroughly happy and healthy holiday of
some weeks in September and October. The
Bishop and Baron Mink, a local magnate, were
congenial hosts, and the visit of the two clever
young men was the signal for various festivities,
in which all the aristocracy of the country side —
'a princess, two countesses, and three baronesses,'
in Schober's enumeration — took part, and in
which the music and drollery of Schubert and
his friend delighted every one. The great result
of the visit however was the composition of an
opera to Schober's words, on a romantic subject
of battles, love, conspiracy, hunting, peasant life,
and everything else, so natural in opera librettos,
so impossible in real life. It was called ' Alfonso
and Estrella,' and two acts were completed be
fore their return to town. The first act is dated
at the end of the autograph Sept. 20, and the
second Oct. 20. A week later they were back
again in Vienna.
1 The change In this symphony from the Scherzo In C to the Trio
In A, by an E in octaves in the oboes lasting 4 bars, is an anticipation
of the similar change iu the same place in the great C major Sym
phony of 1828, and a. curious instance of the singular way in which
many of Schubert's earlier symphonies lead up to his crowning
eflort.
SCHUBERT.
335
The songs composed in 1821 are very im
portant, and comprise some of his very finest,
and in the most various styles. It is sufficient
to name among the published ones ' Grenzen
der Menschheit' (Feb., Lf. 14, no. i) ; <Ge-
heimes1 (March, op. 14, no. 2); Suleika's two
songs (ops. 14, 31); ' Sey mir gegrusst' (op. 20,
no. i) ; and ' Die Nachtigal,' for four men's
voices (op. II, no. 2) — all of the very highest
excellence, of astonishing variety, and enough
of themselves to make the fame of any ordinary
coinposer. A fine setting of ' Mahomet's song,'
by Goethe, for bass (possibly for Lablache), was
begun in March, but remains a MS. fragment.
The third act of 'Alfonso and Estrella' was
finished on Feb. 27, 1822. The fact that a
thoroughly worldly, mercenary, money-making
manager like Barbaja, who was at the same time
a firm believer in Rossini, had become lessee
of the two principal theatres of Vienna, augured
badly for Schubert's chance of success in that
direction. But indeed the new piece seems to
have been calculated to baffle any manager, not
only in Vienna, but everywhere else. It caused,
as we shall see, a violent dispute, eighteen months
later, between Schubert and Weber, which but
for Schubert's good temper would have led to a
permanent quarrel. Anna Milder, to whom Schu
bert sent a copy of the work in 1825, tells him,
in a letter full of kindness and enthusiasm, that
the libretto will not suit the taste of the Berliners,
' who are accustomed to the grand tragic opera,
or the French ope"ra comique.' Nor was the
libretto the only drawback. Schubert, like Bee
thoven in 'Fidelio/ was in advance of the modest
execution of those days. At Gratz, the abode
of the Huttenbrenners, where there was a foyer
of Schubert-enthusiasts, the opera got as far as
rehearsal, and would probably have reached the
stage, if the accompaniments had not proved
impossible for the band.2 No performance took
place until twenty-six years after poor Schubert's
death, namely at Weimar, on June 24, 1854,
under the direction of Liszt, who. with all his
devotion to the master, had to reduce it much
for performance. It was very carefully studied,
and yet the success, even in that classical
town, and with all Liszt's enthusiasm and in
fluence, seems to have been practically nil. At
last, however, its time came. Twenty-five years
later, in 1879, ^ was again taken in hand by
Capellmeister Johann Fuchs of the Court opera,
Vienna, who entirely rewrote the libretto, and
greatly curtailed the work ; and in this form it
was brought to performance at Carlsruhe in
March 1881, with great success. Several num
bers were extremely applauded, and the opera
now bids fair to become a stock piece in the
German, and let us hope the English, theatres.
But to return to Schubert and 1822. Early
in the year he made the acquaintance3 of
2 K.H. 249 (i. 252).
3 For their meeting we have the authority of Weber's son In his
biography, ii. 4'->0. But his statement that Schubert was alienated
from Weber by Weber's critio.ism on Rosamunde is more than
doubtful, because Eosamunde was probably not composed till soma
19 months later, aud because it was not Schubert's habit to tako
offence at criticism.
336
SCHUBERT.
Weber, who spent a few weeks of February and
March in Vienna to arrange for the production of
his Euryanthe. No particulars of their intercourse
on this occasion survive. With Beethoven Schu
bert had as yet hardly exchanged words. And
this is hardly to be wondered at, because, though
Vienna was not a large city, yet the paths of the
two men were quite separate. Apart from the
great difference in their ages, and from Beethoven's
peculiar position in the town, his habits were
fixed, his deafness was a great obstacle to inter
course, and, for the last five or six years, what
with the lawsuits into which his nephew dragged
him, and the severe labour entailed by the com
position of the Mass in D, and of the Sonatas
ops. 106, 109, no, and in — works which by no
means flowed from him with the ease that masses
and sonatas did from Schubert — he was very in
accessible. Any stranger arriving from abroad,
with a letter of introduction, was seen and
treated civilly. But Schubert was a born Vien
nese, and at the time of which we speak, Bee
thoven was as much a part of Vienna as St.
Stephen's tower, and to visit him required some
special reason, and more than special resolution.
A remark of Rochlitz's1 in the July of this year
shows that Schubert was in the habit of going to
the same restaurant with Beethoven, and wor
shipping at a distance ; but the first direct
evidence of their coming into contact occurs at
this date. On April 19, 1822, he published a set
of Variations on a French air as op. 10, and de
dicated them to Beethoven as ' his admirer and
worshipper ' (sein Verehrer und Bewunderer). The
Variations were written in the preceding winter,
and Schubert presented them in person to the
great master. There are two versions of the
interview, 2Schindler's and J. Hiittenbrenner's.
Schindler was constantly about Beethoven. He
was devoted to Schubert, and is very unlikely to
have given a depreciating account of him.
There is therefore no reason for doubting his
statement, especially as his own interest or vanity
were not concerned. It is the first time we
meet Schubert face to face. He was accom
panied by Diabelli, who was just beginning
to find out his commercial value, and would
naturally be anxious for his success. Beethoven
was at home, and we know the somewhat over
whelming courtesy with which he welcomed a
stranger. Schubert was more bashful and retir
ing than ever ; and when the great man handed
him the sheaf of paper and the carpenter's
pencil provided for the replies of his visitors,
could not collect himself sufficiently to write
a word. Then the Variations were produced,
with their enthusiastic dedication, which prob
ably added to Beethoven's good humour. He
opened them and looked through them, and
seeing something that startled him, naturally
pointed it out. At this Schubert's last remnant
of self-control seems to have deserted him, and
he rushed from the room. When he got into
1 'FurFreundederTonkunst/iv. S52. See the lifelike and touch-
Ing picture by Braun von Braun given in Nohl's Beethoven, iii. 682.
2 Scoindler's 'Beethoven,' ii, 176.
SCHUBERT.
the street, and was out of the magic of Bee
thoven's personality, his presence of mind re
turned, and all that he might have said flashed
upon him, but it was too late. The story is
perfectly natural, and we ought to thank
Beethoven's Boswell for it. Which of us would
not have done the same ? Beethoven kept the
Variations and liked them ; and it must have
been some consolation to the bashful Franz to
hear that he often played them with his nephew.
Hiittenbrenner's 3 story is that Schubert called,
but found Beethoven out ; which may have been
an invention of Diabelli's to shield his young
client.
This autumn Schubert again took up the Mass
in Ab, which was begun in 1819; finished it, and
inscribed it lim Jb 822 beendet.' * Not that that
was the final redaction ; for, contrary to his
usual practice — in fact it is almost a solitary
instance — he took it up again before his death,
and made material improvements5 both in the
position of the voice-parts and in the instru
mentation, as may be seen from the autograph
score now in the Library of the Gesellschaft der
Musikfreunde.
This year seems to have been passed entirely in
Vienna, at least there are no traces of any
journey ; and the imprisonment in the broiling
city, away from the nature he so dearly loved,
was not likely to improve his spirits. What
events or circumstances are alluded to in the in
teresting piece called ' My 6 dream,' dated 'July
1822,' it is hard to guess. It may not improbably
have been occasioned by some dispute on re
ligious subjects of the nature of those hinted at
in his brother Ignaz's letter7 of Oct. 12, 1818.
At any rate it is deeply pathetic and poetical.
During this summer Joseph Hiittenbrenner
was active in the cause of his friend. He made
no less than four endeavours to bring out the
'Teufels Lustschloss' — at the Josefstadt and
Court theatres of Vienna, at Munich, and at
Prague. At Prague alone was there a gleam
of hope. Hollbeiu, the manager there, requests
to have the score and parts sent to him, at the
same time regretting that during a month which
he had passed in Vienna, Schubert had not once
come near him. Huttenbrenner also urged
Schubert on Peters, the publisher, of Leipzig,
who in a tedious egotistical letter, dated Nov. 14,
1822, gives the usual sound reasons of a cautious
publisher against taking up with an unknown
composer — for in North Germany Schubert was
8 K.H. 261 (i. 264). 4 7 b stands for September.
5 This was kindly pointed out to the writer by Mr. Brahms, who bu
an early copy of the score, made by Ferdinand Schubert from the
autograph in its original condition. In this shape Mr. Brahms re
hearsed the mass, but found many portions unsatisfactory, and fl
interested to discover subsequently from the autograph that Schu
bert had altered the very passages alluded to, and made them prac
ticable.— He made three attempts at the 'Cum Sancto' befoi
succeeding, each time in fugue, and always with a different subject.
Of the first there are 4 bars ; of the second 199 ; the third is th
printed in Schreiber's edition. This edition is unfortunately very
incorrect. Not only does it swarm with misprints, but whole P
sages, and those most important ones (as in the Horns and Trom
bones of the Dona), are clean omitted. The nuances also are shame*
fully treated. . ,
e First printed by B. Schumann in the 'NeueZeitschiiftfttrMusiK
for Feb. 5, 1839. See also K.H. 333 (ii. 16).
7 E.U.. 146 (i. 148).
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
337
still all but unknown. One is sorry to hear of a
little rebuff which he sustained at this time from
the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde of Vienna, to
whom he applied to be admitted as a practising
member (on the viola), but who refused him on
the ground of his being a professional, and there
fore outside their rules.1 A somewhat similar
repulse was experienced by Haydn from the
Tonkiinstler Societ'at. [See vol. i. 707 ct.] On the
other hand, the musical societies both of Linz and
Gratz elected him an honorary member. To the
latter of these distinctions we owe the two beauti
ful movements of the Symphony No. 8, in B minor,
which was begun at Vienna on Oct. 30, 1822, and
intended as a return for the compliment. The
Allegro and Andante alone are finished, but these
are of singular beauty and the greatest originality.
In them, for the first time in orchestral composi
tion, Schubert exhibits a style absolutely his own,
untinged by any predecessor, and full of that
strangely direct appeal to the hearer of which
we have already spoken. It is certain that he
never heard the music played, and that the
new and delicate effects and orchestral combina
tions with which it is crowded, were the result
of his imagination alone. The first movement is
sadly full of agitation and distress. It lay hidden
at Gratz for many years, until obtained from
Anselm Hiittenbrenner by Herbeck, who first
produced it in Vienna at one of the Gesell
schaft concerts in i865.2 It was published by
the excellent Spina early in 1867; was played
at the Crystal Palace, Sydenham, April 6, 1867,
and elsewhere in England, and always with in
creasing success. In fact no one can hear it
without being captivated by it.
The Songs composed in 1822 — 14 printed and
2 in MS. — comprise 'Epistel von Collin' (Lf. 46;
Jan.) ; 'Heliopolis' (Lf. 37, no. I ; April); 'Todes-
musik,' with a magnificent opening (op. 108, no. 2;
Sept.); 'Schatzgrabers Begehr' (op. 23, no. 4 ;
Nov.) with its stately bass; 'Willkommen und
Abschied' (op. 56, no. i ; Dec.) ; 'Die Rose' (op.
73)and'DerMusensohn' (op. 92). The concerted
pieces, 'Constitutionslied ' (op. 157; Jan.), 'Geist
der Liebe' (op. n, No. 3), 'Gott in der Natur'
(°P- J33)> and 'Des Tages Weihe' (op. 146), all
belong to this year.
Publication went on in 1822, though not so
briskly as before. The Variations dedicated to
Beethoven (op. 10) were first to appear, on April
19. They were followed by op. 8 (4 songs) on
May 9, and op. II (3 part-songs) on June 12.
Then came a long gap till Dec. 13, on which
day ops. 12, 13, and 14, all songs, appeared at
once. We have not space to name them. But
with such accumulated treasures to draw upon, it
is unnecessary to say that they are all of the first
class. The pecuniary result of the publications
of 1821 had been good ; 2000 gulden were real
ised, and of the ' Erl King ' alone more than 800
copies had been sold ; and if Schubert had been
provident enough to keep his works in his own
possession he would soon have been out of the
reach of want. This however he did not do.
K. H. 280 (i. 283).
VOL. III. PT. 3.
2 See Hauslick, 'Concertsaal,' 350.
Pressed by the want of money, in an incautious
moment he sold the first 12 of his 3 works to
Diabelli for 800 silver gulden (£80), and en
tered into some injudicious arrangement with
the same firm for future publications. His old
and kind friend Count Dietrichstein about this
time offered him a post as organist to the Court
Chapel, but he refused it, and he was probably
right, though in so doing he greatly distressed
his methodical old father. His habits, like
Beethoven's, made it absurd for him to under
take any duties requiring strict attendance.
The Vienna Theatre being closed to Alfonso
and Estrella, Schubert turned his thoughts in
the direction of Dresden, where his admirer
Anna Milder was living, and where Weber was
Director of the Opera ; and we find him in a
letter of Feb. 28, 1823 (recently published 4 for
the first time) asking his old patron Herr von
Mosel for a letter of recommendation to Weber.
He is confined to the house by illness, and apolo
gises for not being able to call. There are no
traces of reply to this application, but it probably
led to nothing, for, as we shall see, the score
of the opera was still in his hands in October.
He was evidently now set upon opera. In the
letter just mentioned he implores von Mosel to
entrust him with a libretto 'suitable for his
littleness'; and though he seems never to have
obtained this, he went on with the best he could
get, and 1823 saw the birth of no less than
three dramatic pieces. The first was a one-act
play with dialogue, adapted from the French by
Castelli, and called ' die Verschworenen,' or ' the
Conspirators.' The play was published in the
'Dramatic Garland' — an annual collection of
dramas — for 1823. Schubert must have seen it
soon after publication, and by April had finished
the composition of it. The autograph, in the British
Museum, has at the end the words ' Aprill 1823.
F. Schubert, Ende der Oper.' It contains an over
ture and II numbers, and appears from Bauern-
feld's testimony to have been composed with a
view to representation at the Court-theatre. The
libretto is a very poor one, with but few dramatic
points, and confines the composer mainly to the
Chorus. The licensers changed its title to the less
suspicious one of ' Die hausliche Krieg ' or ' The
domestic Struggle,' and it was duly sent in to the
management, but it returned in twelve months
without examination. It did not come to per
formance at all during Schubert's lifetime, nor
till 1 86 1. In that year it was given, under Her-
beck's direction, by the Musikverein, Vienna, on
March i and 1 2 ; and on the stage at Frankfort
on Aug. 29; since then at the Court-theatre,
Vienna, at Munich, Salzburg, and other German
towns; in Paris, Feb. 3, 1868, as < La Croisade
des Dames,' and at the Crystal Palace, Syden
ham, March 2, 1872 as 'The Conspirators.'
In less than two months after throwing off
3 So say the books ; but the works published on commission were
ops. 1—7, containing 20 songs.
•> In the Neue Ereie Presse of Vienna, Nov. 19, 1881. The letter,
though formal in style, is curiously free in some of its expressions.
It mentions the overture to the 1st Act of Alfonso and Estrella.
What can this be? The overture known under that name (op. 69) is
dated 'Dec. 1823,' and is said to have been written fur Rosamunde.
338
SCHUBERT.
this lively Singspiel, Schubert had embarked
in something far more serious, a regular 3-act
opera of the ' heroico-romantic ' pattern — also
with spoken dialogue — the scene laid in Spain,
with Moors, knights, a king, a king's daughter,
and all the usual furniture of these dreary
compilations. The libretto of 'Fierabras,' by
Josef Kupelwieser— enough of itself to justify
all l Wagner s charges against the opera books of
the old school — was commissioned by Barbaja for
the Court-theatre. The book was passed by the
Censure on July 21 ; but Schubert had by that
time advanced far in his labours, and had in fact
completed more than half of the piece. He began
it, as his own date tells us, on May 25. Act i,
filling 304 pages of large oblong paper,2 was com
pletely scored by the 3 1st of the month ; Act 2,
in 5 days more, by June 5 ; and the whole 3 acts,
fully 1000 pages, and containing an overture and
23 numbers, were entirely out of hand by Oct. 2.
And all for nothing ! Schubert was not even
kept long in suspense, for early in the following
year he learnt that the work had been dis
missed. The ground for its rejection was the
badness of the libretto ; but knowing Barbaja's
character, and seeing that Kupelwieser was
secretary to a rival house (the Josefstadt), it is
difficult not to suspect that the commission had
been given by the wily Italian, merely to faci
litate the progress of some piece of business be
tween the two establishments.
It is, as Liszt has remarked, extraordinary
that Schubert, who was brought up from his
youth on the finest poetry, should have unhesi
tatingly accepted the absurd and impracticable
librettos which he did, and which have kept in
oblivion so much of his splendid music. His
devotion to his friends, and his irrepressible
desire to utter what was in him, no doubt help
to explain the anomaly, but an anomaly it will
always remain. It is absolutely distressing to
think of such extraordinary ability, and such
still more extraordinary powers of work, being
so cruelly thrown away, and of the sickening
disappointment which these repeated failures
must have entailed on so simple and sensitive a
heart as his. Fortunately for us the strains in
which he vents his griefs are as beautiful and en
dearing as those in which he celebrates his joys : —
He wore no less a loving face
Because so broken hearted.
His work this summer was not however to be
all disappointment. If the theatre turned a deaf
ear to his strains there were always his beloved
songs to confide in, and they never deceived him.
Of the Song in Schubert's hands we may say what
Wordsworth so well says of the Sonnet : —
With this key
Shakespeare unlocked his heart ; the melody
Of this small lute gave ease to Petrarch's wound.
• •••••• •
and when a damp
Fell round the path of Milton, in his hand
The thing became a trumpet, whence he blew
Soul-animating strains, alas too few !
— with the notable difference that it was given
1 Hanslick, ' Concertsaal," 160.
2 The autograph was shown to Mr. Sullivan and the writer by that
energetic Schubert apostle, Heir Johann Herbeck, in 1868. ,
SCHUBERT.
to Schubert to gather up and express, in his one
person and his one art, all the various moods and
passions which Wordsworth has divided amongst
so many mighty poets.
And now, in the midst of the overwhelming
tumult and absorption which inevitably accom
pany the production of so large a work of imagin
ation as a three-act opera, brought into being at
so extraordinarily rapid a pace, he was to stop,
and to indite a set of songs, which though not of
greater worth than many others of his, are yet
so intelligible, so expressive, address themselves
to such universal feelings, and form so attractive
a whole, that they have certainly become more
popular, and are more widely and permanently
beloved, than any similar production by any
other composer. We have already described
the incident through which Schubert made ac
quaintance with the Miiller-lieder 3 of Wilhelm
Miiller, twenty of which he selected for the
beautiful series or 'Cyclus,' so widely known
as the ' Schb'ne Miillerin.' We have seen the
enduring impatience with which he attacked a
book when it took his fancy, and the eagerness
with which he began upon this particular one.
We know that the Miiller-lieder were all com
posed this year ; that some of them were written
in hospital ; that No. 1 5 is dated ' October ' ; that
a considerable interval elapsed between the 2nd
and 3rd Act of 'Fierabras' — probably the best part
of July and August. Putting these facts together
it seems to follow that the call on Randhartinger
(see p. 32 7 a) and the composition of the first num
bers of the ' Schone Miillerin ' took place in May,
before he became immersed in ' Fierabras.1 Then
came the first two Acts of that opera ; then his
illness, and his sojourn in the hospital, and more
songs ; then the third Act of the opera ; and
lastly the completion of the Lieder.
Be this as it may, there was no lack of occu
pation for Schubert after he had put 'Fierabras'
out of hand. Weber arrived in Vienna late in
September 1823, and on Oct. 3 began the rehear
sals of ' Euryanthe'; and for a month the musical
world of Austria was in a ferment. After the
first performance, on Oct. 25, Weber and Schu
bert came somewhat into collision. Schubert,
with characteristic frankness, asserted that the
new work wanted the geniality and grace of
' Der Freischiitz,' that its merit lay mainly in its
harmony,4 and that he was prepared to prove
that the score did not contain a single original
melodv- Weber had been much tried by the
• • • i i_ 1 *
rehearsals, by the growing conviction that his
work was too long, and by the imperfect success
of the performance ; and with a combination of
ignorance and insolence which does him no credit
replied, ' Let the fool learn something himself before
he criticises me/ Schubert's answer to this was to
8 The Muller-lleder. 23 in number, with Prologue and Epilogue in
addition, are contained in the 1st vol. of the 'Gedichte aus «
hinterlassenen Papieren eiues reisenden Waldhornisten ' i
found among the papers of a travelling French-horn-player), wmcn
were first published at Dessau, 1821. Schubert has omitted the rro
logue and Epilogue, and 3 poems— 'Das Muhlenleben' after
Neugierige ' ; ' Erster Schmerz, letzter Scherz,' after ' Eifersucht un
Stolz ' ; and ' Bliimlein Vergissmein ' after ' Die bOse Farbe.'
< See Mendelssohn's opinion, in ' The Mendelssohn Family,' i. 237.
SCHUBERT.
go off to Weber with the score of ' Alfonso and
Estrella.' When they had looked through this,
Weber returned to Schubert's criticisms on 'Eury-
anthe,' and finding that the honest Franz stuck
to his point, was absurd enough to lose his
temper, and say, in the obvious belief that the
score before him was Schubert's first attempt, ' I
tell you the first puppies and the first operas are
always drowned.' Franz, it is unnecessary to
gay, bore no malice, even for so galling a speech,
and it is due to Weber to state that he took
some pains later to have the work adopted at
the Dresden theatre.1
Schubert did not yet know the fate which
awaited ' Fierabras ' ; all was at present couleur
de rose ; and the fascination of the theatre, the
desire innate in all musicians, even one so self-
contained as Schubert, to address a large public,
sharpened not improbably by the chance recently
enjoyed by the stranger, was too strong to be
resisted, and he again, for the third time in
ten months, turned towards the stage. This
time the temptation came in the shape of 'Rosa-
munde, Princess of Cyprus,' a play of ultra-
romantic character, by Madame von Chezy,
authoress of ' Euryanthe,' a librettist whose lot
seems to have been to drag down the musicians
connected with her. The book of ' Rosamunde '
must have been at least as inefficient as that
with which Weber had been struggling, to cause
the failure of such magnificent and interesting
music as Schubert made for it. The drama has
disappeared, but Kreissle2 gives the plot, and it is
both tedious and improbable. It had moreover the
disadvantage of competition with a sensational
spectacular piece, written expressly to suit the taste
of the suburban house, the Theatre an-der-Wien,
at which ' Rosamunde ' was produced, and which,
since the time when Schikaneder induced Mozart
to join him in the 'Magic 3Flute,' had a reputa
tion for such extravaganzas. Schubert com
pleted the music in five days.* It consists of an
5 Overture in D, since published as 'Alfonso and
Estrella/ op, 69 ; 3 Entr'actes ; 2 numbers of
ballet music ; a little piece for clarinets, horns,
and bassoons, called a ' Shepherds' Melody,' of
bewitching beauty ; a Romance for soprano solo,
and 3 Choruses. The Romance (op. 26), the
Shepherds' Chorus, the Entr'acte in Bb, and the
Air de Ballet in G, are not only very beautiful
but very attractive ; and the Entr'acte in B minor,
of a grand, gloomy, and highly imaginative cast,
is one of the finest pieces of music existing. The
play was brought out on Dec. 20, 1823 ; the
overture, though the entire orchestral part of the
music had only one rehearsal of two hours, was
twice redemanded, other numbers were loudly
applauded, and Schubert himself was called
for at the close ; but it only survived one more
representation, and then the parts were tied up
and forgotten till the year 1867, when they were
discovered by two English travellers in Vienna.
1 K H. 246 (1. 249) note. 2 Ibid. 285 (i. 288), etc.
Produced at the Theatre an-der-Wien, Sept. 30, 1791.
4 So sars Wilhelm von Chezy, the son of the librettist, who was on
terms with Schubevt. See his Journal, ' Erianerungen/ etc. 1863.
* The autograph is dated ' Dec. 1823.'
SCHUBERT.
339
Besides the Miillerlieder several independent
songs of remarkable beauty belong to 1823.
Conspicuous among these are 'Viola* (Schnee-
glbcklein ; op. 123), a long composition full of
the most romantic tenderness and delicacy,
with all the finish of Meissonnier's pictures,
and all his breadth and dignity. Also the 'Zwerg'
(op. 22, no. i), by Matthias von Collin, in which
Schubert has immortalised the one brother, as
Beethoven, in his overture to ' Coriolan,' did the
other. This long, dramatic, and most pathetic
ballad, which but few can hear unmoved, was
written absolutely a Vimproviste, without note or
sketch, at the top of his speed, talking all the
while to Randhartinger, who was waiting to take
him out for a walk.6 Equal, if not superior, to these
in merit, though of smaller dimensions, are ' Dass
sie hier gewesen' (op. 59, no. 2) ; 'Du bist die
Ruh' (do. no. 3) ; the Barcarolle, ' Auf dem Wasser
zu singen ' (op. 72), to which no nearer date than
' 1823 ' can be given. Below these again, though
still fine songs, are ' Der ziirnende Barde ' (Lf.
9, no. i ; Feb.) ; 'Drang in die Feme' (op. 71 ;
Mar. 25) ; ' Pilgerweise ' (Lf. 18, no. I ; April) ;
4 Vergissmeinnicht ' (Lf. 21, no. 2; May). The
fine Sonata in A minor for PF. solo, published as
op. 143, is dated Feb. 1823, and the sketch of a
scena for tenor solo and chorus of men's voices
with orchestra, dated May 1823. The latter was
completed by Herbeck, and published in 1868 by
Spina as 'Riidiger's Heimkehr.'
Ten works (op. 15-24) were published in 1823.
The earliest was a collection of dances, viz. 1 2
Waltzes, 9 Ecossaises, and 17 Landler, op. 1 8,
published Feb. 5; the PF. Fantasia, op. 15,
followed on Feb. 24. The rest are songs, either
solo — op. 20, April 10; op. 22, May 27; op. 23,
Aug. 4; op. 24, Oct. 7; op. 1 6, Oct. 9; op. 19,
21 (no dates) — or part-songs, op. 17, Oct. 9. With
op. 20, the names of Sauer & Leidesdorf first
occur as publishers.
The year 1824 began almost exclusively with
instrumental compositions. An Introduction and
Variations for PF. and flute (op. 1 60), on the
'Trockne Blumen' of the 'Scho'ne Miillerin,'
are dated ' January,' and were followed by the
famous Octet (op. 1 66), for clarinet, horn, bas
soon, 2 violins, viola, cello, and contrabass,
which is marked as begun in February, and
finished on March I. It was written — not, let
us hope, without adequate remuneration, though
that was probably the last thing of which its
author thought — for Count F. Troyer, chief
officer of the household to the Archduke Rudolph,
Beethoven's patron. In this beautiful compo
sition Schubert indulges his love of extension. It
contains, like Beethoven's Septet, 8 movements ;
but, unlike the Septet, it occupies more than
an hour in performance. But though long, no
one can call it tedious.7 The Count played the
clarinet, and must have been delighted with the
expressive melody allotted to him in the Andante.
The work was performed immediately after its
« Kreissle, Sketch, p. 154 note.
i Published by Spina in 1854. It is a great favourite at the Popular
Concerts in London, baying been played 18 times since March 4, 1867.
22
340
SCHUBERT.
composition, with Schuppanzigh, Weiss, and
Linke, three of the famous Rassomofsky quartet,
amongst the players. His association with the
members of this celebrated party may well have
led Schubert to write string-quartets; at any
rate he himself tells us that he had written two
before the 3ist March,1 and these are doubtless
those in Eb and E (op. 125), since the only other
quartet bearing the date of 1824 — that in A mi
nor — has so strong a Hungarian flavour as to
point to his visit to Zsel&sz later in the year.
How powerfully his thoughts were running at
present on orchestral music is evident from the
fact that he mentions both octet and quartets as
2 studies for 'the Grand Symphony,' which was
then his goal, though he did not reach it till
eighteen months later.
A bitter disappointment however was awaiting
him in the rejection of 'Fierabras,' which, as
already mentioned, was returned by Barbaja,
ostensibly on account of the badness of its
libretto. Two full-sized operas — this and 'Al
fonso and Estrella' — to be laid on the shelf
without even a rehearsal ! Whatever the cause,
the blow must have been equally severe to our
simple, genuine, composer, who had no doubt
been expecting, not without reason, day by day
for the last four months, to hear of the acceptance
of his work. His picture of himself under this
temporary eclipse of hope is mournful in the
extreme, though natural enough to the easily
depressed temperament of a man of genius. After
speaking of himself as 'the most unfortunate,
most miserable being on earth,' he goes on to
say, ' think of a man whose health can never
be restored, and who from sheer despair makes
matters worse instead of better. Think, I say,
of a man whose brightest hopes have come to
nothing, to whom love and friendship are but
torture, and whose enthusiasm for the beautiful
is fast vanishing ; and ask yourself if such a man
is not truly unhappy.
My peace is gone, my heart is sore,
Gone for ever and evermore.
This is my daily cry; for every night I go to
sleep hoping never again to wake, and every
morning only brings back the torment of the day
before. Thus joylessly and friendlessly would
pass my days, if Schwind did not often look in,
and give me a glimpse of the old happy times.
. . . Your brother's opera' — this is a letter to
Kupelwieser the painter, and the allusion is to
Fierabras — 'turns out to be impracticable, and
my music is therefore wasted. Castelli's ' Ver-
schworenen' has been set in Berlin by a com
poser there, and produced with success. Thus
I have composed two operas for nothing.' This
sad mood, real enough at the moment, was
only natural after such repulses. It was as
sisted, as Schubert's depression always was, by
the absence of many of his friends, and also, as
he himself confesses, by his acquaintance with
Leidesdorf the publisher (in Beethoven's banter
1 In his letter to Leopold Kupelwieser of March 31. K. H. 321 (11. 5).
2 ' In this manner I shall prepare the way to the Grand Symphony
(zur grossen SinfbnieV Ibid.
SCHUBERT.
' Dorf des Leides,' a very ' village of sorrow '),
whom he describes as a thoroughly good, trust
worthy fellow, 'but so very melancholy that I
begin to fear I may have learnt too much from
him in that direction.' It must surely have been
after an evening with this worthy that he made the
touching entries in his journal which have been
preserved; e.g. 'Grief sharpens the understand
ing and strengthens the soul : Joy on the other
hand seldom troubles itself about the one, and
makes the other effeminate or frivolous.' 'My
musical works are the product of my genius and
my misery, and what the public most relish is
that which has given me the greatest distress.'
Fortunately, in men of the genuine composer-
temperament, the various moods of mind follow
one another rapidly. As soon as they begin to
compose the demon flies and heaven opens. That
gloomy document called 'Beethoven's Will,' to
which even Schubert's most wretched letters
must yield the palm, was written at the very
time that he was pouring out the gay and
healthy strains of his 2nd Symphony. Schubert
left town with the Esterhazys in a few weeks
after these distressing utterances, and for a time
forgot his troubles in the distractions of country
life in Hungary. At Zsele'sz he remained for six
months, but his life there is almost entirely a
blank to us. We can only estimate it by the
compositions which are attributable to the period,
and by the scanty information conveyed by
his letters, which, though fuller of complaint
than those of 1818, are even less communicative
of facts and occurrences. To this visit is to be
ascribed that noble composition known as the
'Grand Duo' (op. 140), though designated by him
self as ' Sonata for the PF. for four hands. Zsele's,
June 1824' ; a piece which, though recalling in
one movement Beethoven's 2nd, and in another
his yth Symphony, is yet full of the individu
ality of its author ; a symphonic work in every
sense of the word, which, through Joachim's in
strumentation, has now become an orchestral
symphony, and a very fine one. To Zsel&z also
is due the Sonata in Bb (op. 30, May or June),
the Variations in Ab (op. 35, 'middle of 1824')*
2 Waltzes (in op. 33, '1824, July'), and4Landler
('July, 1824,' Nott. p. 215)— all for PF. 4 hands;
other Waltzes and Landler in the same collections
for 2 hands ; and the ' Gebet ' of Lamotte Fouqu£
(op. I39a), signed 'Sept. 1824, at Zele'sz in
Hungary1 — all evidently arising from the ne
cessity of providing music for the Count's family
circle. The young Countesses were now nine
teen and seventeen, and doubtless good per
formers, as is implied in the duet-form of the
pianoforte works. We are probably right in also
attributing the lovely String Quartet in A minor
(op. 29), and the 4-hand 'Divertissement a la
hongroise' (op. 54), to this visit, at any rate
to its immediate influence. Both are steeped in
the Hungarian spirit, and the Divertissement
contains a succession of real national tunes, one
of which he heard from the lips of a maidservant
as he passed the kitchen with Baron Scho'nstein
in returning from a walk. For the Baron was
SCHUBERT.
at Zselesz on this as on the last occasion, and
frequent and exquisite must have been the per
formances of the many fine songs which Schubert
had written in the interval since his former visit.
The circumstances attending the composition
of the vocal quartet (' Gebet,' op. 139) just men
tioned are told by Kreissle, probably on the
authority of Schbnstein, and they give a good
instance of Schubert's extraordinary facility.
At breakfast one morning, in Sept. 1824, the
Countess produced Lamotte Fouque"s poem, and
proposed to Schubert to set it for the family
party. He withdrew after breakfast, taking
the book with him, and in the evening, less
than ten hours afterwards, it was tried through
from the score at the piano. The next evening it
was sung again, this time from separate parts,
which Schubert had written out during the day.
The piece is composed for quartet, with solos for
Mad. Esterhazy, Marie, Schonstein, and the
Count, and contains 209 bars. A MS. letter of
Ferdinand's,1 dated July 3, full of that strong
half-reverential affection which was Ferdinand's
habitual attitude towards his gifted brother, and
of curious details, mentions having sent him
Bach's fugues (never-cloying food of great com
posers), and an opera-book, 'Der kurze Mantel.'
Strange fascination of the stage, which thus, in
despite of so many failures, could keep him still
enthralled !
The country air of the Hungarian mountains,
and no doubt the sound and healthy living
and early hours of the chateau, restored Schu
bert's health completely, and in a letter of
Sept. 2 1 to Schober he says that for five months
he had been well. But he felt his isolation, and
the want of congenial Vienna society keenly;
speaks with regret of having been ' enticed ' into
a second visit to Hungary, and complains of not
having a single person near to whom he could
say a sensible word. How different from the
exuberant happiness of the visits to Steyr and
St. Pb'lten, when every one he met was a demon
strative admirer, and every evening brought a
fresh triumph !
Now, if ever, was the date of his tender
feeling for his pupil Caroline Esterhazy, which
his biographers have probably much exagge
rated. She was seventeen at the time, and
Bauernfeld represents her as the object of an
ideal devotion, which soothed, comforted, and
inspirited Schubert to the end of his life. Ideal
it can only have been, considering the etiquette
of the time, and the wide distance between the
stations of the two ; and the only occasion on
which Schubert is ever alleged to have approached
anything like a revelation of his feelings, is that
told by Kreissle — on what authority he does
not say, and it is hard to conceive — when on
her jokingly reproaching him for not having
dedicated anything to her, he replied, 'Why
should I ? everything I ever did is dedicated
to you.' True, the fine Fantasia in F minor,
published in the March following his death as
i For -which I again gladly acknowledge the kindness of Frl. Caroline
Geisler, of Vienna, Schubert's grandniece.
SCHUBERT.
341
op. 103, is dedicated to her 'by Franz Schubert,'
a step which the publishers would hardly have
ventured upon unless the MS. — probably handed
to them before his death — had been so inscribed
by himself. But it is difficult to reconcile the
complaints of isolation and neglect already
quoted from his letter to Schober with the exist
ence of a passion which must have been fed
every time he met his pupil or sat down to the
piano with her. We must be content to leave
each reader to decide the question for himself.
Vocal composition he laid aside almost entirely
in 1824. The only songs which we can ascer
tain to belong to it are four — the fine though
gloomy ones called 'Auflbsung' (Lf. 34, no. i).
and 'Abendstern' (Lf. 22, no. 4), both by
Mayrhofer; another evening song, 'Im Abend-
roth,' by Lappe (Lf. 20, no. i), all three in
March; and the bass song, 'Lied einesKrieger's'
(Lf. 20, no. 2), with which he closed the last2 day
of the year. Of part-songs there are two, both
for men's voices ; one a ' Salve regina,' written
in April, before leaving town; and the other,
the ' Gondelfahrer,' or Gondolier, a very fine
and picturesque composition, of which Lablache
is said to have been fond. — A Sonata for PF. and
Arpeggione, in A minor, dated Nov. 1824, was
probably one of his first compositions after re
turning to town.3
The publications of 1824 embrace ops. 25 to
28 inclusive, all issued by Sauer & Leidesdorf.
Op. 25 is the 'Schbne Miillerin,' 20 songs in
five numbers, published March 25; op. 26 is the
vocal music in 'Rosamunde,'4 the romance and
three choruses; op. 27, three fine 'heroin marches,1
for PF. 4 hands ; op. 28, ' Der Gondelfahrer,' for
four men's voices and PF., Aug. 12.
1825 was a happy year to our hero — happy
and productive. He was back again in his dear
Vienna, and exchanged the isolation of Zselesz for
the old familiar life, with his congenial friends
Vogl, Schwind, Jenger, Mayrhofer, etc. (Schober
was in Prussia, and Kupelwieser still at Rome),
in whose applause and sympathy and genial con
viviality he rapidly forgot the disappointments and
depression that had troubled him in the autumn.
Sofie Muller, one of the great actresses of that
day, evidently a very accomplished, cultivated
woman, was then in Vienna, and during February
and March her house was the resort of Schubert,
Jenger, and Vogl, who sang or listened to her
singing of his best and newest Lieder, — she her
self sang the ' Junge Nonne ' at sight on March
3 — and lived a pleasant and thoroughly artistic
life.5 Others, which she mentions as new, and
which indeed had their birth at this time, are
' Der Einsame,' and ' Ihr Grab,' The ' new songs
from the Pirate,' which she heard on March i,
may have been some from the Lady of the Lake,
or ' Norna's song,' or even ' Anna Lyle,' usually
placed two years later. Schubert published some
2 The autograph, so dated, belongs to Mr. C. J. Hargitt, London.
3 Gotthard, 1871. Autograph in Musik Verein.
* Besides the vocal music, the overture was published about 1828,
and the Entractes and Ballet music in 1866.
5 See her interesting Journal, in her ' Leben und nachgelassene
Papiere herausg. von Johann Grafen Majlath' (Vienna 1832).
342
SCHUBERT.
important works early in this year, the Overture
in "F for 4 hands (op. 34) ; also the Sonata in Bb (op.
30), and the Variations in Ab (op. 35), both for 4
hands ; and the String Quartet in A minor (op. 29)
— fruits of his sojourn in Hungary. The last of
these, the only quartet he was destined to pub
lish during his life, is dedicated 'to his friend
I. Schuppanzigh,' a pleasant memorial of the
acquaintance cemented by the performance of
the octet, a twelvemonth before. And as on
such publications some amount of money passes
from the publisher to the composer, this fact of
itself would contribute to enliven and inspirit
him. In addition to these instrumental works
some noble songs were issued in the early part
of 1825 — ' Der ziirnenden Diana,' and the
' Nachtstuck,' of Mayrhofer ; * Der Pilgrim' and
•Der Alpenjager,' of Schiller; and Zuleika's
second song. The two beautiful solo sonatas in
A minor and in C — the latter of which he never
succeeded in completely writing out, but the
fragment of which is of first-rate quality — also
date from this time.
As if to revenge himself for his sufferings at
the Esterhazys', he planned an extensive tour for
this summer, in his favourite district, and in
the company of his favourite friend. Vogl on
March 31 started for his home at Steyr. Schu
bert 1 soon followed him, and the next five months,
to the end of October, were passed in a delightful
mixture of music, friends, fine scenery, lovely
weather, and absolute ease and comfort, in
Upper Austria and the Salzkammergut, partly
amongst the good people who had welcomed him
so warmly in 1819, partly among new friends and
new enthusiasm. Taking Steyr as their point
d'appui they made excursions to Linz, Steyreck,
Gmunden, Salzburg, and even as far as Gastein,
etc., heartily enjoying the glorious scenery by day,
received everywhere on arrival with open arms,
and making the best possible impression with
their joint performances. The songs from 'The
Lady of the Lake,' were either composed before
starting or on. the road. At any rate they formed
the chief programme during the excursion. If
the whole seven were sung or not is 2 un
certain ; but Schubert particularly mentions the
' Ave Maria/ a propos to which he makes an
interesting revelation. ' My new songs,' says
he, ' from Walter Scott's Lady of the Lake,
have been very successful. People were greatly
astonished at the devotion which I have thrown
into the Hymn to the Blessed Virgin, and it
seems to have seized and impressed everybody.
I think that the reason of this is that I never
force myself into devotion, or compose hymns or
prayers unless I am really overpowered by the feel
ing ; that alone is real, true devotion.' It is during
this journey, at Salzburg, that he makes the re
mark, already noticed, as to the performance of
Vogl and himself. At Salzburg too, it was the 'Ave
Maria ' that so rivetfced his hearers. ' We pro
duced our seven pieces before a select circle, and
1 The dates of the early part of the tour are not to be made out.
2 Schubert speaks of them as 'unsere sieben Sachen' (Latter to
Ferdinand, Kreissle 363) ; but Nos. 3 and 4 are for chorus.
SCHUBERT.
all were much impressed, especially by the Ave
Maria, which I mentioned in my former letter.
The way in which Vogl sings and I accompany,
so that for the moment we seem to be one, is
something quite new and unexpected to these
good people.' Schubert sometimes performed
alone. He had brought some variations and
marches for 4 hands with him, and finding a
good player at the convents of Florian and
Kremsmunster, had made a great effect with
them. But he was especially successful with the
lovely variations from the solo Sonata in A minor
(op. 42); and here again he lets us into his
secret. 'There I played alone, and not without
success, for I was assured that the keys under
my hands sang like voices, which if true makes
me very glad, because I cannot abide that ac
cursed thumping, which even eminent players
adopt, but which delights neither my ears nor my
judgment.' He found his compositions well known
throughout Upper Austria. The gentry fought for
the honour of receiving him, and to this day old
people are found to talk with equal enthusiasm of
his lovely music, and of the unaffected gaiety
and simplicity of his ways and manners.
The main feature of the tour was the excursion
to Gastein in the mountains of East Tyrol. To
Schubert this was new ground, and the delight
in the scenery which animates his description
is obvious. They reached it about Aug. 18, and
appear to have remained three or four weeks,
returning to Gmunden about Sept. 10. At
Gastein, among other good people, he found his
old ally Ladislaus Pyrker, Patriarch of Venice,
and composed two songs to his poetry, 'Heimweh'
and ' Allmaeht ' (op. 79). But the great work of
this date was the ' Grand Symphony ' which had
been before him for so long. We found him 18
months ago writing quartets and the octet as
preparation for it, and an allusion in a letter3
of Schwind's shows that at the beginning of
August he spoke of the thing as virtually done.
That it was actually put on to paper at Gastein
at this date we know from the testimony of
*Bauerafeld, who also informs us that it was a
special favourite with its composer. Seven songs
in all are dated in this autumn, amongst them
two fine scenes from a play by W. von Schutz
called ' Lacrimas ' (op. 1 24), not so well known
as they deserve.
The letters of this tour, though not all preserved,
are unusually numerous for one who so much
disliked writing. One long one to his father and
mother; another, much longer, to Ferdinand; a
third to Spaun, and a fourth to Bauernfeld, are
printed by Kreissle, and contain passages of real
interest, showing how keenly he observed and how
thoroughly he enjoyed nature, and displaying
throughout a vein of good sense and even 5 prac
tical sagacity, and a facility of expression, which
are rare in him.
3 K. H. 358 (H. 43). ' To your Symphony we tire looking forward
eagerly.' implying that Schubert had mentioned it in a former letter.
4 W. Z. K., June 9—13, 1829.
5 See his shrewd reasons for not at once accepting Bauernfeld's
proposition that he, Schwind and Schubert should all live together.
K. H. 370 (ii. 57). Also the whole letter to Spaun.
SCHUBERT.
At length the summer and the money came to
an end, Vogl went off to Italy for his gout, and
Schubert, meeting Gahy at Linz, returned with
him and the MS. Symphony to Vienna in an Ein-
spdnner, to find Schober and Ku pel wieser both once
more settled there. The first thing to be done
was to replenish his purse, and this he soon did
by the sale of the seven songs from ' The Lady of
the Lake,' which he disposed of on Oct. 29 to
Artaria, for 200 silver gulden — just £20 ! Twenty
pounds however were a mine of wealth to Schu
bert; and even after repaying the money which
had been advanced by his father, and by Bauern-
feld for the rent of the lodgings during his ab
sence, he would still have a few pounds in hand.
During Schubert's absence in the country his
old friend Salieri died, and was succeeded by
Eybler. The Court organist also fell ill, and
Schwind wrote urging him to look after the
post ; but Schubert makes no sign, and evidently
did nothing in the matter, though the organist
died on Nov. 19. He obviously knew much
better than his friends that he was absolutely
unfit for any post requiring punctuality or re
straint. In the course of this year he was
made ' Ersatzmann,' or substitute — whatever that
may mean — by the Musik-Verein, or Gesellschaft
der Musikfreunde. Of what happened from this
time till the close of 1825 we have no certain
information. He set two songs by Schulze (Lf.
13, nos. I, 2) in December; and it is probable
that the Piano Sonata in D (op. 53), and the
noble funeral march for the Emperor of Russia
(op. 55), whose death was known in Vienna on
Dec. 14, both belong to that month. What
gave him his interest in the death of Alexander
is not known, but the march is an extraordinarily
fine specimen. A piece for the Piano in F, serving
as accompaniment to a recitation from a poem by
Pratobevera, a series of graceful modulations in
arpeggio form, also dates from this year.1
The compositions of 1825 may be here summed
up : — Sonata for PF. solo in A minor (op. 42) ;
ditto in D (op. 53) ; ditto in A (op. 120); un
finished ditto in C (' Reliquie,' Nott. p. 211) ; a
funeral march, 4 hands, for the Emperor Alex
ander of Russia (op. 55). Songs — 'Des Sangers
Habe,' by Schlechta, and ' Im Walde,' by E.
Schulze; 7 from ' The Lady of the Lake' (op. 52) ;
another from 2 Scott's ' Pirate'; 'Auf der Briicke,'
by Schulze; ' Flille der Liebe,' by Schlegel;
'Allmacht' and 'Heimweh,' by Pyrker; two
scenes from ' Lacrimas,' by W. von Schutz ; and
' Abendlied fur die Entfernte,' by A. W. Schlegel ;
'Die junge Nonne,' ' Todtengrabers Heimweh,'
and 'Der blinde Knabe,' all by Craigher; 'Der
Einsame,' by Lappe; and, in December, 'An
mein Herz ' and ' Der liebliche Stern,' both by
Ernst Schulze. It is also more than probable
that the String- quartet in D minor was at least
begun before the end of the year.
The publications of 1825 are: — In January,
°ps- 32> 30, 345 Feb- TI» °PS- 36 and 37 ; May 9,
SCHUBERT.
343
1 Printed by Keissmann In his book.
2 So says Sofie Milller (under date of Mar. 1) ; but perhaps it was
her mistake for Norman's song in ' The Lady of the Lake.'
op. 38; July 25, op. 43; Aug. 12, op. 31 ; and,
without note of date, ops. 29 and 33. Op. 29 is
the lovely A minor Quartet ; and it is worthy of
note that it is published as the first of 'Trois
quatuors.' This was never carried out. The
two others were written, as we have already seen
(p. 340 a), but they remained unpublished till
after the death of their author.
1826 was hardly eventful in any sense of the
word, though by no means unimportant in
Schubert's history. It seems to have been passed
entirely in Vienna. He contemplated a trip to
Linz with Spaun and Schwind, but it did not
come off. The weather of this spring was extra
ordinarily bad, and during April and May he
composed nothing.3 The music attributable to
1826 is, however, of first-rate quality. The
String Quartet in D minor, by common consent
placed at the head of Schubert's music of this
class, was first played on Jan. 29, and was there
fore doubtless only just completed.* That in G
(op. 161), Schubert himself has dated as being
written in ten days (June 20 to June 30), a work
teeming with fresh vigour after the inaction of the
preceding two months, as full of melody, spirit,
romance, variety, and individuality, as anything
he ever 5 penned, and only prevented from taking
the same high position as the preceding, by its
great length — due to the diffuseness which Schu
bert would no doubt have remedied had he
given himself time to do so. One little point
may be mentioned en passant in both these noble
works— the evidence they afford of his lingering
fondness for the past. In the D minor Quartet
he goes back for the subject and feeling of the
Andante to a song of his own of 1816, and the
Finale of the G major is curiously tinged with
reminiscences of the Rossini- fever of 1819.
The 'Rondeau brillant' in B minor for PF.
and violin (op. 70), now such a favourite in the
concert-room, also belongs to this year, though it
cannot be precisely dated ; and so does a piece of
still higher quality, which is pronounced by
Schumann to be its author's ' most perfect work
both in form and conception,' the Sonata in G
major for PF. solo, op. 78, usually called the 'Fan
tasia,' owing to a freak of the publisher's. The
autograph is inscribed, in the hand of its author,
'IV. Senate fur Pianoforte allein. Oct. 1826,
Franz Schubert'; above which, in the writing
of Tobias Haslinger, stands the title ' Fantasie,
Andante, Menuetto und Allegretto.' We may
well say with Beethoven, ' 0 Tobias ! '
By the side of these undying productions the
'Marche heVoique,' written to celebrate the
accession of Nicholas I. of Russia, and the
Andantino and Rondo on French motifs — both
for PF. 4 hands, are not of great significance.
An attack of song-writing seems to have come
upon him in March, which date we find attached
3 See his letter to Bauernfeld and Mayrhofer, In 'Die Presse,' April
21, 1869.
4 K. H. 391(ii.77). The finale was voted too long, to which Schubert,
after a few minutes consideration, agreed, and ' at once cut out a good
part.' (Hauer's information.) The autograph has disappeared.
6 Played at the Monday Popular Concerts of Dec. 14, 68, and Jan. 13,
79 ; Joachim leading on both occasions.
344
SCHUBERT.
to six songs ; or, if the rest of those to Seidl's
words forming ops. 105 and 80, and marked
merely ' 1826,' were written at the same time (as,
from Schubert's habit of eviscerating his books,
they not improbably were) — twelve. Three
Shakspeare songs are due to this July — 'Havk!
hark! the lark,'1 from 'Cymbeline'; 'Who is
Sylvia ? ' from the ' Two Gentlemen of Verona ' ;
and the Drinking-song in 'Antony and Cleopatra'
—the first two perhaps as popular as any single
songs of Schubert's. The circumstances of the com
position, or rather creation, of the first of these has
already been mentioned (p. 327 a). The fact of
three songs from the same volume belonging to one
month (not improbably to one day, if we only
knew) is quite a la Schubert. — A beautiful and
most characteristic piece of this year is the ' Nacht-
helle ' (or Lovely night), written to words of Seidl's
—not improbably for the Musikverein, through
Anna Frohlich — for tenor solo, with accompani
ment of 4 men's voices and pianoforte, which
would be a treasure to singing societies, for its
truly romantic loveliness, but for the inordinate
height to which the voices are taken, and the great
difficulty of executing it with sufficient delicacy.
A song called ' Echo ' (op. 1 30), probably written
in 1826, was intended to be the first of six
' humorous songs ' for Weigl's firm.2
We hear nothing of the new Symphony during
the early part of this year. No doubt it was
often played from the MS. score at the meetings
of the Schubert set, but they say no more about it
than they do of the Octet, or Quartets, or Sonatas,
which were all equally in existence ; and for
aught we know it might have been ' locked in a
drawer,' which was often Schubert's custom after
completing a work — 'locked in a drawer and
never thought about again.'3 It was however
destined to a different fate. On the Qth Sept.
1826, at one of the first meetings of the Board
of the Musik Verein after the summer recess,
Hofrath Kiesewetter reports that Schubert desires
to dedicate a symphony to the Society ; upon
which the sum of 100 silver florins (£10) is voted
to him, not in payment for the work, but as a
token of sympathy, and as an encouragement.
The letter conveying the money is dated the
1 2th, and on or even before its receipt Schubert
brought the manuscript and deposited it with the
Society. His letter accompanying it may here
be quoted : —
To the Committee of the Austrian Musical Society.—
Convinced of the noble desire of the Society to give its
best support to every effort in the cause of art, I venture,
as a native artist, to dedicate this my Symphony to the
Society, and most respectfully to recommend myself to
its protection. With the highest esteem, Your obedt.
FRANZ SCHUBERT.
In accordance with this, the MS. probably bears
his formal dedication to the Verein, and we may
expect to find that though so long talked of, it
bears marks of having been written down as
rapidly as most of his other productions.* At
1 Entitled ' Serenade,' but more accurately an ' Aubade.'
2 See Nottebohm's Catalogue under op. 130.
3 Lachner's expression to my friend Mr. C. A. Barry In 1881.
4 The documents on which these statements are based are given by
Herr C. F. Pohl in his History of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde
SCHUBERT.
present however all trace of it is gone ; not even
its key is known. There is no entry of it in the
catalogue of the Society's Library, and except for
the minute and letter given above, and the posi
tive statements of Bauernfeld quoted below5 it
might as well be non-existent. That it is an
entirely distinct work from that in C, written
2 1 years later, can hardly admit of a doubt.
Of the publications of 1826, the most re
markable are the seven songs from ' The Lady
of the Lake,' for which Artaria had paid him
200 florins in the preceding October, and which
appeared on the 5th of this April, in two parts,
as op. 52. They were succeeded immediately,
on April 8, by the PF. Sonata in D (op. 53), and
the 'Divertissement a la hongroise' (op. 54),
both issued by the same firm. For these two
splendid works Schubert received from the
penurious Artaria only 300 Vienna florins, equal
to £12. Songs issued fast from the press at
this date ; for on the 6th of April we find op. 56
(3 songs) announced by Pennauer, and ops. 57
and 58 (each 3 songs) by Weigl ; on June
10, op. 60 (' Greisengesang ' and ' Dithyrambe ')
by Cappi and Czerny ; in Sept. op. 59 (4 songs,
including * Dass sie hier gewesen,' ' Du bist die
Ruh,' and 'Lachen und Weinen ') by Leidesdorf ;
and op. 64 (3 part-songs for men's voices) by
Pennauer ; and on Nov. 24, op. 65 (3 songs)
by Cappi and Czerny. Some of these were com
posed as early as 1814, 15, 16; others again
in 1820, 22, and 23. The Mass in C (op. 48),
and three early pieces of church music, ' Tantum
ergo' (op. 45), ' Tot us in corde' (op. 46), and
'Salve Regina' (op. 47), were all issued in this
year by Diabelli. Of dances and marches for
piano there are 8 numbers : — a Galop and 8
Ecossaises (op. 49) ; 34 Valses sentimentales
(op. 50) ; * Hommage aux belles Viennoises' (16
Landler and 2 Ecossaises, op. 67) ; 3 Marches
(4 hands, op. 51) — all published by Diabelli;
the 2 Russian Marches (op. 55, 56), by Pen
nauer ; 6 Polonaises (op. 61), Cappi and Czerny;
and a Divertissement, or 'Marche brillante et
raisonne'e,' on French motifs (op. 63), Weigl.
In all, 22 publications, divided between 6 pub
lishers, and containing 106 works. c
We have been thus particular to name the
numbers and publishers of these works, because
—or Musikverein— Vienna 1871, p. 16 ; and by Ferdinand Schubert in
the Neue Zeitschrift fur Husik for April 30. 1839. p. 140.
5 Bauernfeld. in an article ' Ueber Franz Schubert ' in the ' Wiener
Zeitschrift fur Kunst, Literatur, Theater, und Mode,' for 9, 11, 13
June. 1829 (Nos. 69, 70, 71), says as follows:— 'To the larger works of
his latter years also belongs a Symphony written in 1825 at Gastein,
for which its author had an especial predilection At a great
concert given by the Musik Verein shortly after his death a Sym
phony in C was performed, which was composed as early as 1817
118181. and which he considered as one of his less successful works. . .
Perhaps the Society intends at some future time to make us ac
quainted with one of the later Symphonies, possibly the Gastein cue
already mentioned.' [N.B. The two movements of the B minor Sym
phony (1822) -were not at this time known, so that by ' later Sym
phonies' Bauerufeld must surely intend the two of 1825 and 1828.]
At the end of the article he gives a ' chronological list of Schubert^
principal works not yet generally known.' Amongst these are '1825,
Grand Symphony.' . . '1828, Last Symphony '—'Grand ' (grosse) being
the word used by Schubert himself in his letter to Kupelwieser
referred to above (p. 340 a). It Is plain therefore that at this time, seven
months after Schubert's death, the Gastein Symphony of 1825, and
that in C major of 1828, were known as distinct works. The present
writer has collected the evidence for the existence of the Symphony
in a letter to the London ' Athenaeum ' of Nov. 19, 1881.
SCHUBERT.
they show conclusively how much Schubert's
music was coining into demand. Pennauer and
Leidesdorf were his personal friends, and may
possibly have printed his pieces from chivalrous
motives; but no one can suspect hard and ex
perienced men of business like Diabelli and
Artaria of publishing the music of any one at
their own risk unless they believed that there
was a demand for it. The list is a remarkable
one, and will compare for extent and variety
with that of most years of Beethoven's life.
And even at the incredibly low1 prices which his
publishers gave for the exclusive copyright of
his works, there is enough in the above to pro
duce an income sufficient for Schubert's wants.
But the fact is that he was mixed up with a set
of young fellows who regarded him as a Croesus,2
and who virtually lived upon his carelessness
and good-nature, under the guise of keeping
house in common. Bauernfeld, in an article in
the Vienna 'Presse' of April 17, 1869, has given
us the account with some naivete. A league or
partnership was made between himself, Schwind
the painter, and Schubert. They had nominally
their own lodgings, but often slept all together in
the room of one. The affection between them was
extraordinary. Schubert used to call Schwind
' seine Geliebte * — his innamorata I A kind of
common property was established in clothes and
money ; hats, coats, boots, and cravats were worn
in common, and the one who was in cash paid the
score of the others. As Schwind and Bauernfeld
were considerably younger than Schubert, that
duty naturally fell on him. When he had sold
a piece of music he seemed to this happy trio to
'swim in money,' which was then spent 'right
and left ' in the most reckless manner, till it was
all gone, and the period of reverse came. Under
these circumstances life was a series of fluctua
tions, in which the party were never rich, and
often very poor. On one occasion Bauernfeld
and Schubert met in a coffee-house near the
Karnthnerthor theatre, and each detected the
other in ordering a melange (cafi au lait) and
biscuits, because neither had the money to pay
for dinner. And this in Schubert's 2Qth year,
when he had already written immortal works
quite sufficient to make a good livelihood ! Out
side the circle of this trio were a number of
other young people, artists and literary men,
Schober, Jenger, Kupelwieser, etc., attracted by
Schubert's genius, good-nature, and love of fun,
and all more or less profiting by the generosity
of one who never knew what it was to deny a
friend. The evenings of this jolly company were
usually passed in the Gasthaus, and then they
would wander about, till daybreak drove them
to their several quarters, or to the room of one
1 It is said by Schindler that the prices agreed on with him were
10 Vienna gulden per Heft of songs, and 12 per pianoforte piece. (The
Vienna gulden was then worth just 1 franc. ' Heft ' meant then a single
song, not a 'Part' of two or three. This is conclusively proved by
Ferdinand Schubert's letter of 1824.) These prices were not adhered
to. Thus for the 7 ' Lady of the Lake ' songs he had 500 paper gulden =
20J., or nearly 81. per song. Even that is low enough. On the other
hand, F. Lachner told Mr. Barry that in the last year of Schubert's
life, he took half-a-dozen of the ' Winterreise ' songs to Haslinger at
Schubert's request, and brought back 1 gulden a piece (=10£) for them !
* The expression is Bauemfeld's.
SCHUBERT.
345
of the party. It would be absurd to judge Vienna
manners from an English point of view. The
Gasthaus took the place of a modern club, and
the drink consumed probably did not much
exceed that which some distinguished Vienna
artists now imbibe night after night, and does
not imply the excess that it would infallibly
lead to in a Northern climate ; but it must be
obvious that few constitutions could stand such
racket, and that the exertion of thus trying his
strength by night and his brain by day, must
have been more than any frame could stand. In
fact his health did not stand the wear and tear.
We have seen that in Feb. 1823 he could not
leave the house ; that in the summer of the same
year he was confined to the hospital; that in
March 1824 he speaks of his health as irrecover
ably gone ; and the dedication of the six 4-hand
Marches, op. 40, to his friend Bernhardt, doctor
of medicine, 'as a token of gratitude,' is strong
evidence that in 1826, the year of their publi
cation, he had had another severe attack.
It was probably a sense of the precarious
nature of such a life that led some of his friends
in the autumn of 1826 to urge Schubert to stand
for the post of Vice-capellmeister in the Imperial
Court, vacant by the promotion of Eybler to that
of principal capellmeister ; but the application,
like every other of the same kind made by him,
was a failure, and the place was given to Joseph
Weigl by the Imperial decree of Jan. 27, 1827.
Another opportunity of acquiring a fixed in
come was opened to him during the same autumn,
by the removal of Karl August Krebs3 from
the conductorship of the Court theatre to Ham
burg. Vogl interested Duport, the adminis
trator of the theatre, in his friend, and the
appointment was made to depend on Schubert's
success in composing some scenes for the stage.
Madame Schechner, for whom the principal part
was intended, and whose voice at that time was
on the wane, at the pianoforte rehearsals objected
to some passages in her air, but could not induce
the composer to alter them. The same thing
happened at the first orchestral rehearsal, when
it also became evident that the accompaniments
were too noisy for the voice. Still Schubert was
immovable. At the full -band rehearsal Schech
ner fairly broke down, and refused to sing any
more. Duport then stept forward, and formally
requested Schubert to alter the music before the
next meeting. This he refused to do ; but
taking the same course as Beethoven had done
on a similar occasion, said loudly, 'I will alter
nothing,' took up his score and left the house.
After this the question of the conductorship
was at an end. Schubert's behaviour in this
matter has been strongly censured, -but we do
not see much in it. Such questions will always
depend on the temperament of the composer.
Had it been either Mozart or Mendelssohn we
cannob doubt that all would have gone smoothly ;
the prima donna would not only not have been
ruffled, but would have felt herself complimented,
and the music would have been so altered as to
3 Father of Miss Mary Krebs the pianist.
346
SCHUBEHT.
meet every one's wish, and yet sound as well as
before. On the other hand, had it been Beethoven
or Schumann we may be equally sure that not a
note would have been changed, and that every
thing would have ended in confusion. With all
Schubert's good-nature, when his music was con
cerned he was of the same mind as Beethoven
and Schumann. There are other instances of the
same stubbornness, which will be noticed later.
Some set-off to these disappointments was af
forded by the ready way in which his Gastein
Symphony was received by the Musik-Verein,
and the sympathetic resolution and prompt dona
tion which accompanied its acceptance, although
no attempt to perform or even rehearse it can now
be traced. The beautiful ' Nachthelle,' already
referred to, which he composed in September,
was rehearsed during the early winter months,
and performed by the Society on Jan. -25, 1827.
Some little gratification also he not improbably
derived from the letters which during this year
he began to receive from publishers in the north.
Probst of Leipzig — one of Beethoven's publishers,
predecessor of the present firm of Senff — was the
first to write. His letter is dated Aug. 26, and
is followed by one from Breitkopf & Hartel of
Sept. 7- True, neither are very encouraging.
Probst speaks of his music as too often ' peculiar
and odd,' and 'not intelligible or satisfactory to the
public'; and begs him to write so as to be easily
understood; while Breitkopf stipulates that the
only remuneration at first shall be some copies of
the works. Still, even with this poor present
result, the fact was obvious that he had begun to
attract attention outside of Austria.
As to Schubert's life in the early part of 1827
we have little to guide us beyond the scanty
inferences to be drawn from the dated compo
sitions. The first of these of any moment are 8
Variations (the 8th very much extended) on a
theme in Herold's opera ' Marie/ for PF. 4
hands (op. 82). 'Marie' was produced on the
Vienna boards Jan. 18, 1827; and Schubert's
Variations are dated 'February,' and are dedicated
to one of his friends in Upper Austria, Prof.
Cajetan Neuhaus of Linz. The next and still
more important work is the first half of the
' Winterreise,' 12 songs ('Gute Nacht' to 'Ein-
samkeit'), marked as begun in Feb. 1827. Franz
Lachner remembers that ' half a dozen ' of them
were written in one morning, and that Diabelli
gave a gulden (that is a franc) apiece for them.
The poems which form the basis of this work are
by Wilhelm Miiller, the poet of the 'Schone Miil-
lerin,' which the Winterreise closely approaches
in popularity, and which it would probably equal
if the maiden of the Winter-walk were as definite
a creation as the miller's daughter is. They are
24 in * all, and appear under their now immortal
name in the 2nd volume of the work of which
vol. i. contained the 'Schone Miillerin,' and which
has the quaint title already quoted (p. 338 b). The
and vol. was published at Dessau in 1824, and
did not at once attract Schubert's notice. When
ifc did, he made short work of it. Another im-
i The order of the songs is much changed in the music.
SCHUBERT.
portant composition of this month (dated Feb.
28) is the Schlachtlied (battle-song) of Klopstock,
set for 2 choirs of male voices, sometimes answer
ing, sometimes in 8 real parts, of immense force
and vigour, and marked by that dogged adherence
to rhythm so characteristic of Schubert.
He can scarcely have finished with this before
the news that Beethoven was in danger spread
through Vienna. The great musician got back
to his rooms in the Schwarzspanierhaus from his
fatal expedition to Gneixendorf in the first week
of December, became very ill, and during January
was tapped for the dropsy three times. Then
Malfatti was called in, and there was a slight
improvement. During this he was allowed to read,
and it was then that Schindler, a zealous Schubert-
propagandist, took the opportunity to put some
of Schubert's songs into his hands.1 He made a
selection of about 60, in print and MS., including
' Iphigenie,' ' Grenzen der Menschheit,' ' All-
macht,' 'Die junge2Nonne,' 'Viola,' the 'Miiller-
lieder,' etc. Beethoven up to this time probably
did not know half a dozen of Schubert's composi
tions, and his astonishment was extreme, especi
ally when he heard that there existed at least
500 of the same kind. ( How can he find time,
said he, to set such long poems, many of them
containing ten others'?' i. e. as long as ten separate
ones ; and said over and over again, ' If I bad
had this poem I would have set it myself;
' Truly Schubert has the divine fire in him.' He
pored over them for days, and asked to see Schu
bert's operas and PF. pieces, but the illness re
turned and it was too late. But from this time
till his death he spoke often of Schubert, regret
ting that he had not sooner known his worth, and
prophesying that he would make much stir in
the world.8 Schubert was sure to hear of these
gratifying utterances, and they would naturally
increase his desire to come into close contact
with the master whom he had long worshipped
at a distance. It is possible that this embold
ened him to visit the dying man. He seems to
have gone twice ; first with Ansehn Hiitten-
brenner and Schindler. Schindler told Bee
thoven that they were there, and asked who he
would see first. 'Schubert may come in first'
was the answer. At this visit perhaps, if ever/
it was, that he said, in his affectionate way, 'You,
Anselna, have my mind (Geist), but Franz has
my soul (Seele).' The second time he went with
Josef Hiittenbrenner and Teltscher the painter.
They stood round the bed. Beethoven was
aware of their presence, and fixing his eyes
on them, made some signs with his hand. No
one however could explain what was meant,
and no words passed on either side. Schubert
left the room overcome with emotion. In about
1 Schindler. 'Beethoven,' il. 136.
2 Schindler's list of the songs perused by Beethoven differs in hi
two accounts. Compare his 'Beethoven,' ii. 136, with K.H. 264 (
266).
3 Schindler, in BSuerle's Theaterzeitung (Vienna), May 3, 1831.
4 See von Leitner, ' Anselm Hiittenbrenner,' Ciratz, 1868, p. 5. I
story has an apocryphal air, but Hiittenbrenner was so thorough!)
trustworthy, that it is difficult to reject it. At any rate, B-ethove
is not likely to have thus expressed himself before he had made ac
quaintance with Schubert's music.
SCHUBERT.
three weeks came the end, and then the funeral.
Schubert was one of the torch-bearers. Franz
Lachner and Eandhartinger walked with him
to and from the Cemetery. The way back lay
by the Himmelpfortgrund, and close by the
humble house in which he had drawn his first
breath. They walked on into the town, and
stopped at the 'Mehlgrube,' a tavern in the
Karnthnerthorstrasse, now the Hotel Munsch.
There they called for wine, and Schubert drank
off two glasses, one to the memory of Beethoven,
the other to the first of the three friends who should
follow him. It was destined to be himself.
Lablache was also one of the torch-bearers
at the funeral. This and the part which he took
in the Kequiem for Beethoven [vol. i. 201 a] may
have induced Schubert to write for him the ' 3
Italian Songs for a Bass voice,' which form op. 83,
and are dedicated to the great Italian basso.
Hummel and Hiller were in Vienna during
March 1827, and Hiller describes meeting Schu
bert and Vogl at Madame Lacsny-Buchwieser's,
and his astonishment at their joint performance.
'Schubert,' says l Hiller, 'had little technique, and
Vogl but little voice ; but they had both so much
life and feeling, and went so thoroughly into the
thing, that it would be impossible to render these
wonderful compositions more clearly and more
splendidly. Voice and piano became as nothing ;
the music seemed to- want no material help, but
the melodies appealed to the ear as a vision does
to the eye.' Not only did the boy think it the
deepest musical impression he had ever received,
but the tears coursed down the cheeks even of
the veteran Hummel. Either then or a few
evenings afterwards, Hummel showed his appre
ciation by extemporising on Schubert's ' Blinde
Knabe,' which Vogl had just sung — to Franz's
delight.
In April Schubert wrote the beautiful ' Nacht-
gesang im Walde ' (op. 139 &) for 4 men's voices
and 4 horns; and a 'Spring Song,' also for men's
voices, still ia MS. In July we have the very
fine and characteristic serenade ' Zogernd leise'
(op. 135) for alto solo and female voices, a worthy
pendant to the ' Nachthelle,' and written almost
a I'lmprovisfe? A fete was to be held for the
birthday of a young lady of Dobling. Grillparzer
had written some verses for the occasion, and
Schubert, who was constantly in and out of the
Frohlichs' house, was asked by Anna to set them
for her sister Josephine and her pupils. He took
the lines, went aside into the window, pushed up
his spectacles on to his brow, and then, with the
paper close to his face, read them carefully twice
through. It was enough : ' I have it, said he,
it's done, and will go famously.' A day or two
afterwards he brought the score, but he had em
ployed a male chorus instead of a female one,
and had to take it away and transpose it. It
was sung in the garden by moonlight, to the
delight of every one, the villagers thronging round
the gate. He alone was absent.
1827 witnessed another attempt at an opera —
the ' Graf von Gleichen,' written by Bauernfeld,
i KOnstlerleben (1880), p, 49. 2 K.H. 474 (it. 160).
SCHUBERT.
347
apparently in concurrence3 with Mayrhofer.
Schubert had the libretto in August, 1826, sub
mitted it to the management of the Royal Opera-
house, and arranged with Grillparzer, in case the
Censure should cause its rejection,' to have it ac
cepted by the Konigstadt Theatre. Owing pos
sibly to the delay of the Censure it was nearly a
year before he could begin the composition. The
MS. sketch, now in Herr Dumba's collection, is
dated at the beginning '17 Juni 1827.' The opera
is sketched throughout, and he played portions
of it to Bauernfeld. Forty years later the sketch
came into the hands of Herbeck, and he began
to score it after Schubert's indications — of which
there are plenty — but was prevented by death.
A correspondence had been going on for long
between the Schubert circle at Vienna and the
Pachler family in Gratz, the capital of Styria,
as to an expedition thither by Schubert, and afc
length it was arranged for the autumn of this
year. Carl Pachler was one of those cultivated
men of business who are such an honour to Ger
many ; an advocate, and at the head of his pro
fession, yet not ashamed to be an enthusiastic
lover of music and musicians, and proud to have
them at his house and to admit them to his inti
mate friendship. Amongst his circle was An-
selm Hiittenbrenner, the brother of Schubert's
friend Josef, himself an earnest admirer of Franz,
whose last visit to Vienna had been to close the
eyes of his old friend Beethoven. The house
was open to painters, singers, actors, and poets,
' the scene of constant hospitalities, the head
quarters of every remarkable person visiting
Gratz/ Such was the family whose one desire
was to receive Schubert and Jenger. The journey,
now accomplished in 5^ hours, was an affair of
two days and a night, even in the fast coach.
They left on Sunday morning, Sept. 2, and
reached Gratz on Monday night. The next three
weeks were spent in the way which Schubert
most enjoyed, excursions and picnics by day
through a beautiful country, and at night inces
sant music ; good eating and drinking, clever
men and pretty women, no fuss, a little romping,
a good piano, a sympathetic audience, and no
notice taken of him — such were the elements
of his enjoyment. The music was made mostly
by themselves, Schubert singing, accompanying,
and playing duets with Jenger, and extemporis
ing endless dance tunes. He does not appear
to have composed anything of great moment
during the visit. A galop and twelve waltzes,
published under the titles of the ' Gratzer Waltzer*
(op. 91) and the 'Gratzer* Galoppe'; 3 songs
(op. 106, i, 2, 3 — the last a particularly fine
one) to words by local poets— and the ' Old
Scottish ballad ' by Herder (op. 165, no. 5),
were probably all that he penned during this
festive fortnight ; unless perhaps some of those
exquisite little pieces published in 1828 and
1838 as 'Impromptus' and 'Momens musicals'
are the result of this time. Two songs, written
3 See Schubert's letter [May, 1826] with Bauernfeld's statements, in
the ' Presse ' of April 21. 1869. and ' Signale,' Nov. 1869.
< Published by Hasliuger, as No. 10 of the 'Favorite Galops,' 1828.
348
SCHUBEKT.
a couple of years before, 'Im Walde,' and 'Auf
der Briicke,' of the purest Schubert, proved, and
justly proved, such favourites that he had them
lithographed and published in the place.1 The
visit is further perpetuated by the titles of the
dances just mentioned, and by the dedication to
Mad. Pachler of op. 106, a collection of four songs,
the three already named, and the lovely 'Sylvia.'
Schubert seems to have had this set of songs
lithographed without name of place or publisher,
shortly after his return, on purpose for his hostess.2
The journey home was a triumphal progress,
and by the syth they were back in Vienna.
Schubert then wrote the second part of the
' Winterreise ' (nos. 13-24), completing that im
mortal work. The shadows lie much darker on
the second than on the first part, and the ' Weg-
weiser,' 'Das Wirthshaus,' 'Die Krahe,' 'Die
Nebensonnen,' and 'Der Leiermann,' are unsur
passed for melancholy among all the songs. Even
in the extraordinary and picturesque energy of
'Die Post' there is a deep vein of sadness. Schu
bert here only followed faithfully, as he always
does, the character of the words.
On October 1 2 he wrote a little 4-hand march
as a souvenir for Faust Pachler, the son of his
host, a trifle interesting only from the circum
stances of its composition. In the same month
he composed his first PF. trio, in Bb (op. 99), and
in November the second, in Eb (op. loo). They
were both written for Booklet, Schuppanzigh, and
Lincke, and were first heard in public, the one
early in January, the other on March 26, 1828.
The year was closed with an Italian cantata,
dated Dec. 26, ' alia bella Irene,' in honour of
Miss Kiesewetter (afterwards Mad. Prokesch v.
Osten), the daughter of his friend the Hofrath,
sponsor to the Gastein Symphony (p. 344 a). It
is still in MS., and is probably more interesting
for its accompaniment for two pianos than for
anything else.
The communications with Probst of Leipzig
went on. There is a letter from him dated
Jan. 15, and he himself paid a visit to Vienna
later in the season, and made Schubert's3 personal
acquaintance, but the negotiations were not
destined to bear fruit till next year. But a
proof that Schubert was making his mark in
North Germany is afforded by a letter from
Bochlitz, the critic — editor of the Leipzig Allge-
meine Musikalische Zeitung, and a great person
age in the musical world of Saxony— dated Nov. 7,
1827, proposing that Schubert should compose a
poem by him, called ' Der erste Ton,' or ' The
first Sound,' a poem which Weber had already
set without success, and which Beethoven had
refused. Rochlitz's letter was probably inspired
by the receipt of three of his songs set by Schubert
as op. 81, and published on May 27. The pro
position however came to nothing.
Coincident with these communications from
abroad came a gratifying proof of the improve-
1 They stood originally in Bb minor and A(?, but on republication
by Diabelli after his death, as op. 93, the keys were changed to Q
minor and G major.
2 Compare Jenger's letter in K.H. (it. 103), note, with Nottebohm's
notice under op. 103. » K,H. 421 (ii. 107).
SCHUBERT.
ment in his position at home, in his election as a
member of the representative body of the Musi-
cal Society of Vienna. The date of election is
not mentioned; but Schubert's reply, as given
by Herr Pohl,4 is dated Vienna, June 12, 1827,
and runs as follows : —
The Managing Committee of the Society of Friends
of Music of the Austrian Empire having thought me
worthy of election as a Member of the Representative
Body of that excellent Society, I beg herewith to state
that I feel myself greatly honoured by their choice, and
that I undertake the duties of the position with much
satisfaction.
FRANZ SCHUBERT, Compositeur.
We have mentioned the more important com
positions of 1827. There remain to be named
two songs by Schober (op. 96, no. 2 ; Lf. 24,
no. i), and one by Reil (op. 115, no. i); a comic
trio, 'Die Hochzeitsbraten ' (op. 104), also by
Schober ; and an Allegretto in C minor for PF.
solo, written for his friend Walcher, ' in remem
brance of April 26, 1827,' and not published till
1870.
The publications of 1827 are as follow:—
the Overture to ' Alfonso and Estrella ' (op. 69) ;
Rondeau brillant, for PF. and violin (op. 70);
songs — 'Der Wachtelschlag ' (op. 68, March 2),
'Drang in die Feme' (op. 71, Feb.), ' Auf dem
Wasser zu singen' (op, 72, Feb.), 'Die Rose'
(op. 73, May 10) — all four songs previously pub
lished in the Vienna Zeitschrift fur Kunst ; four
Polonaises, for PF. 4 hands (op. 75); Overture
to ' Fierabras,' for PF. 4 hands, arranged by Czerny
(op. 76); 12 ' Valses Nobles,' for PF. solo (op.
77, Jan.) ; Fantasie, etc. for PF. in G (op. 78);
2 songs, 'Das Heimweh,' 'Die Allmacht' (op. 79,
'May 1 6'); 3 songs (op. 80, May 25); 3 ditto
(op. 8 1, May 28) ; Variations on theme ofHerold's
(op. 82, Dec.); 3 Italian songs (op. 83, Sept. 12);
4 songs (op. 88, Dec. 12).
We have now arrived at Schubert's last year,
1828. It would be wrong to suppose that he
had any presentiment of his end ; though, if a
passion for work, an eager use of the ' day,' were
any sign that the ' night ' was coming ' in which
no man could work,' we might almost be justi
fied in doing so. We hear of his suffering from
blood to the head, but it was not yet enough to
frighten any one. He returned to the extra
ordinary exertions, or rather to the superabun
dant productions of his earlier years, as the fol
lowing full list of the compositions of 1828, in
order, as far as the dates permit, will show.
Jan. Songs, 'Die Sterne1 (op. 96, no. 1); 'Der Winterabend'
(Lf. 26).
March. Symphony in C, no. 9.
Oratorio, Miriam's Siegesgesang.
Song, ' Auf dem Strom,' Voice and Horn (op. 119).
May. Lebenssturme, PP. duet (op. 144).
Hymn to the Holy Ghost (op. l&t), for 2 Choirs and Wind.
2 Clavierstiicke.
Song, ' Widerschein ' (lief 15, no. 1).
June. Mass in E b (begun).
Fugue in E minor, PF. duet, op. 152 (' Baden, Juny. 1828 )•
Grand Rondeau, PF. duet (op. 107).
July. Psalm 92, in Hebrew, for Baritone and Chorus.
August. Songs, ' Schwanengesang,' nos. 1—13.
Sept. PF. Sonata in C minor.
Ditto in A.
Ditto in B b (' Sept. 26 ').
« 'Die Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde,' etc., p. 16.
SCHUBERT.
Oct. Song, ' Schwanengesang,' No. 14.
New Benedictus to Mass in C.
*Der Hirt auf den Felsen.' Voice and Clarinet (op. 129).
'1828' only. String Quintet in C (op. 163).
This truly extraordinary list includes his great
est known symphony, his greatest and longest
mass, his first oratorio, his finest piece of chamber
music, 3 noble PF. sonatas, and some astonishingly
fine songs. The autograph of the symphony, 218
pages in oblong quarto, is now one of the treasures
of the Library of the Musik-verein at Vienna.
It has no title or dedication, nothing beyond the
customary heading to the first page of the score
'Symfonie Marz 1828, Frz. Schubert Mpia,' mark
ing the date at which it was begun. If it may be
taken as a specimen, he took more pains this year
than he did formerly. In the first three movements
of this great work there are more afterthoughts
than usual. The subject of the Introduction and the
first subject of the Allegro have both been altered.
In several passages an extra bar has been stuck
in — between the Scherzo and the Trio, 2 bars ; in
the development of the Scherzo itself 16 bars of
an exquisite episode — first sketched in the Octet —
have been substituted. The Finale alone remains
virtually untouched.1 But such alterations, always
rare in Schubert, are essentially different from the
painful writing, and erasing, and rewriting, which
we are familiar with in the case of Beethoven's
finest and most spontaneous music. This, though
the first draft, is no rough copy ; there are no traces
of sketches or preparation ; the music has evidently
gone straight on to the paper without any inter
vention, and the alterations are merely a few im
provements2 en passant. It is impossible to look
at the writing of the autograph, after Schubert
has warmed to his work, especially that of the
Finale, and not see that it was put down as an
absolute impromptu, written as fast as the pen
could travel on the paper.
It seems that Schubert's friends used to lec
ture him a good deal on the diifuseness and want
of consideration which they discovered in his
works, and were continually forcing Beethoven's
laborious processes of composition down his throat.
This often made him angry, and when repeated,
evening after evening, he would say, ' So you're
going to set upon me again to day J Go it, I beg
you ! ' But, for all his annoyance, the remon
strances appear to have had some effect; and after
Beethoven's death he asked 3 Schindler to show
him the MS. of Fidelio. He took it to the
piano, and pored over it a long time, making out
the passages as they had been, and comparing
them with what they were ; but it would not
do; and at last he broke out, and exclaimed
that for such drudgery he could see no reason
under any circumstances ; that he thought the
music at first just as good as at last ; and that
for his part he had really no time for such cor
rections. Whether the amendments to the Great
Symphony were a remorseful attempt on Schu-
1 See details by the present writer in Appendix to the Life of
Schubert, translated by A. D. Coleridge, Esq., vol. ii. p. 320.
2 The original MS. orchestral parts show at any rate that the
alterations in the score were made before they were copied from it.
Mr. Stanford kindly examined them for me with that view.
3 Schindler, ' Erinnerungen,' in ' Niederrneinische Musikze'itung,'
1837, pp. 73-78; 81-85.
SCHUBERT.
349
bert's part to imitate Beethoven and satisfy the
demands of his friends we cannot tell ; but if so
they are very unlike the pattern.
The autograph of the Eb Mass, in the Bib-
liothek at Berlin, does not show at all the same
amount of corrections as that in Ab (see p. 336 6),
nor do the fugal movements appear to have given
any special trouble. True, the ' Cum Sancto '
was recommenced after the erasure of 7 bars,*
but apparently merely for the sake of changing
the tempo from C to (J*, and the larger part of
the movement was evidently written with great
rapidity. In the ' Et vitam ' there are barely a
dozen corrections, and the ' Osanna ' has every
mark of extreme haste. Some of the erasures
in this work are made with the penknife — surely
an almost unique thing with Schubert ! The
4 -hand PF. fugue in E minor (op. 152, dated
'Baden, June 1828') is not improbably a trial
of counterpoint with reference to this Mass.
The Songs of 1828 are splendid. It does not
appear that the 14 which were published after
his death with the publisher's title of ' Schwan-
engesang' — 'the Swan's song' — were intended by
him to form a series of the same kind as the
Schone Miillerin and Winterreise ; but no lover
of Schubert can dissociate them, and in the
Liebesbothschaffc, Aufenthalt, Standchen, etc.,
we have some of the most beautiful, and in the
Atlas, Am Meer, Doppelganger, etc., some of the
most impressive, of his many songs. The words
of some are by Rellstab, and the origin of these
is thus told by Schindler.5 Schubert had been
much touched by Schindler's efforts to make Bee
thoven acquainted with his music, and after the
great master's death the two gradually became
intimate. Schindler had possession of many of
Beethoven's papers, and Schubert used to visit
him in familiar style, to look over them. Those
which specially attracted him were the poems
and dramas sent in at various times for con
sideration; amongst others a bundle of some
20 6 anonymous lyrics which Beethoven had
intended to set, -and which therefore attracted
Schubert's particular notice. He took them away
with him, and in two days brought back the
Liebesbothschaft, Kriegers Ahnung, and Aufent
halt, set to music. This account, which is per
fectly natural and consistent, and which Mr. Thayer
allows me to say he sees no reason to question,
has been exaggerated7 into a desire expressed
by Beethoven himself that Schubert should set
these particular songs; but for this there is no
warrant. Ten more quickly followed the three
just mentioned; and these thirteen — 7 to Rell-
stab's and 6 to Heine's words (from the ' Buch8
4 The omission of the words 'Jesu Christe' at the end of the
' Quoniam,' and other omissions, show that he had not conquered the
carelessness as to the treatment of the words, so frequent in his early
Masses. 5 Schindler, ' Erinnerungen/ etc., as before.
6 They proved afterwards to be by Bellstab.
7 See Kellstab's ' An m. Leben' ii. 245.
8 Baron Schonstein relates— K. H. 447 (ii. 135)— that he found Heine's
'Buch der Lieder' on Schubert's table some years before this date,
and that Schubert lent them to him with the remark ' that he should
not want them again.' But such reminiscences are often wrong in
point of date: the fact remains ineffaceable in the mind, the date
easily gets altered. In fact Heine's 'Buch der Lieder' was first
published in 1827. The 6 songs which Schubert took from it are all
from the section entitled ' Der Heimkehr.'
350
SCHUBERT.
der Lieder'), were, on Mr. Nottebohm's authority,
written in August. The last is by Seidl ; it is
dated ' Oct. 1828,' and is probably Schubert's
last song.
But it is time to return to the chronicle of his
life during its last ten months. Of his doings
in January we know little more than can be
gathered from the following letter to Anselm
Hiittenbrenner, the original of which is in the
British Museum.
VIENNA, Jan, 18, 1828.
My dear old Hiittenbrenner. You will wonder at my
writing no w ? So do I. But if I write it is because I am
to get something by it. Now just listen; a drawing-
master's place near you at Gr'atz is vacant, and compe
tition is invited. My brother Karl, whom you probably
know, wishes to get the place. He is very clever, both
as a landscape-painter and a draughtsman. If you could
do anything for him in the matter I should be eternally
obliged to you. You are a great man in Gratz, and
probably know some one in authority, or some one else
who has a vote. My brother is married, and has a
family, and -would therefore be very glad to obtain a per
manent appointment. I hope that things are all right
with you, as well as with your dear family, and your
brothers. A Trio of mine, for Pianoforte, Violin, and
Violoncello, has been lately performed by Schuppanzigh,
and was much liked. It was splendidly executed by
Boklet, Schuppanzigh, and Link. Have you done nothing
new ? A propos, why doesn't 1 Greiner, or whatever his
name is, publish the two songs? "'
Sapperment 1
,
"What's the reason?
SCHUBERT.
I repeat my request: recollect, what you do for my
brother, you do for me. Hoping for a favorable answer,
I remain your true friend, till death,
FRANZ SCHUBERT Mpia.
of Vienna.
The expression 'till death,' which appears
here for the first time in his letters, and the
words ' of Vienna,' added to his name, are both
singular.
On the 24th, at an evening concert at the
Musik-Verein, the serenade for contralto solo and
female chorus just mentioned was performed,
and is spoken of by the correspondent of the
Leipzig A. M. Z. as 'one of the most charming
works of this favourite writer.' In February we
find three letters from North Germany, one from
Probst of Leipzig, and two from Schott. They
show how deep an impression Schubert was
making outside Austria. Both firms express
warm appreciation of his music, both leave the
terms to be named by him, and Schott orders
a list of 9 important pieces.
On March 26 Schubert gave, what we wonder
he never gave before, an evening concert on his
own account in the Hall of the Musik-Verein.
The following is the programme exactly reprinted
from the original.
Einladung
zu dem Privat Concerto, welches Franz Schubert am
26. Marz, Abends 7 Uhr im Locale des oesterreichischen Musikvereina
unter den Tuchlauben No. 558 zu geben die Ehre haben wird.
Vorkomtnende Stiicke.
1. Erster Satz eines neuen Streich Quartetts vorgetragen von.
den Herren Bohm, Holz, Weiss, und Linke.
2. a. Der Kreutzzug, von Leitner ~| Gesange mit Begleittmg dea
b. Die Sterne, von demselben I Piano Forte, vorgetragen yon
c. Fischerweise, von Bar. Schlechta | Herrn Vogl, k. k. pensionirten
d. Fragment aus dem Aeschylus J Hofopernsanger.
3. Standchen von GriUparzer, Sopran-Solo und Chor, vorgetragen von
Fraulein Josephine Frohlich und den Schillerinnen des Con-
servatoriums.
4. Neues Trio fur das Piano Forte, Violin und Violoncelle,
vorgetragen von den Herren Carl Maria von Boklet, Bohm und Linke.
5. Auf dem Strome von Eellstab. Gesang mit Begleitung
des Horns und Piano Forte, vorgetragen von den Herren
Tietze, und Lewy dem Jimgeren.
6. Die Allmacht, von Ladislaus Pyrker, Gesang mit Begleitung
des Piano Forte, vorgetragen von Herren Vogl.
7. Schlachtgesang von Klopfstock, Doppelchor fiir Manner stimmen.
Sammtliche Musikstlicke sind von der Composition des Concertgebers.
Eintrittskarten zu fl. 3. W. W. sind in den Kunsthandlungen
der Herren Haslinger, Diabelli und Leidesdorf zu haben.
This programme attracted 'more people than
the hall had ever before been known to hold,'
and the applause was very great. The net
result to Schubert was 800 gulden, Vienna cur
rency, equal to about £32. This put him in
funds for the moment, and the money flowed
freely. Thus, when, three days later, Paganini
gave his first concert in Vienna, Schubert was
there, undeterred, in his wealth, by a charge of 5
gulden. Nay, he went a second time, not that
he cared to go again, but that he wished to treat
Bauernfeld, who had not 5 farthings, while with
him ' money was as plenty as blackberries.' 2
This month he wrote, or began to write, his
1 A publisher in Grfitz. His name was Kienreich, and the two
songs, 1m Walde, and Auf der Briicke (op. 93), appeared in May.
2 See Bauernfeld's Letter in the ' JPresie,' April 17, 1869. H&ckerling,
chaff, is Schubert's word.
last and greatest Symphony, in C. He is said
to have offered it to the Society for performance,
and in so doing to have expressed himself to the
effect that henceforth he wished to have nothing
more to do with songs, as he was now planted firmly
in Opera and Symphony. This rests on the au
thority of Kreissle ;3 the silence of Herr Pohl in
his history of the Society shows that its minute-
books contain no express mention of the reception
of the work, as they do that of the Symphony in
Oct. 1826. There is no doubt, however, that it
was adopted by the Society, and is entered in
the Catalogue, under the year 1828, as xiii. 8024.*
But this prodigious work was far beyond the
then powers of the chief musical institution of
3 K. H. 445 (ii. 132).
* See Herr Pohl's letter to 'The Times' of Oct. 17, 188L
SCHUBERT.
Vienna. The parts were copied, and some re
hearsals held; but both length and difficulty were
against it, and it was soon withdrawn, on Schu
bert's own advice, in favour of his earlier Sym
phony, No. 6, also in C. Neither the one nor the
other was performed till after his death.
March also saw the birth of the interesting Ora
torio ' Miriam's Song of Victory,' to Grillparzer's
words.1 It is written, as so many of Schubert's
choral pieces are, for a simple pianoforte accom
paniment ; but this was merely to suit the means
at his disposal, and is an instance of his practical
sagacity. It is unfortunate, however, since the
oratorio has become a favourite, that we have no
other orchestral accompaniment than that after
wards adapted by Lachner, which is greatly
wanting in character, and in the picturesque ele
ments so native to Schubert.2 A song to Rell
stab's words, ' Auf dem Strom' (op. 119), for
soprano, with obbligato horn and PF. accompani
ment, written for Lewy, a Dresden horn-player,
belongs to this month, and was indeed first heard
at Schubert's own concert, on the 2 6th, and
afterwards repeated at a concert of Lewy's, on
April 20, Schubert himself playing the accom
paniment each time.
To April no compositions can be ascribed, un
less it be the Quintet in C for strings (op. 163),
which bears only the date '1828.' This is now
universally accepted not only as Schubert's finest
piece of chamber music, but as one of the very
finest of its class. The two cellos alone give
it distinction ; it has all the poetry and ro
mance of the G major Quartet, without the ex
travagant length which will always stand in the
way of that noble production ; while the Adagio
is so solemn and yet so beautiful in its tone, so
entrancing in its melodies, and so incessant in its
interest, and the Trio of the Scherzo, both from
itself and its place in the movement, is so
eminently dramatic, that it is difficult to speak
of either too highly.
In May we have a grand battle-piece, the
'Hymn to the Holy Ghost/ for 8 male voices,
written for the Concert Spirituel of Vienna, at
first with PF., in October scored by the com
poser for a wind band, and in 1847 published
as op. 154. Also a 'Characteristic Allegro' for
the PF. 4 hands, virtually the first movement of
a Sonata — issued some years later with the title
' Lebensstiirme' (op. 144) ; an Allegro vivace and
Allegretto, in Eb minor and major, for PF. solo,
published in 1868 as ist and 2nd of '3 Clavier-
stiicke'; and a song ' Widerschein' (Lf. 15, i).
In June, probably at the request of the pub
lisher, he wrote a 4-hand Rondo for PF. in A,
since issued as 'Grand Rondeau, op. 107'; and
began his sixth Mass, that in Eb. In this month
he paid a visit to Baden — Beethoven's Baden ;
since a fugue for 4 hands in E minor is marked
as written there in ' June 1828.' In the midst of
1 Kreissle. 609 (ii. 285), says that it was produced in the Schubert
Concert, March 1828. But this is contradicted by the Programme
which is printed above. It was first performed Jan. 30, 1829, at a
concert for erecting Schubert's headstone.
2 It has been performed (with Lachner's orchestration) at the
Crystal Palace several times, at the Leeds Festival 18bO,.and elsewhere
in England.
SCHUBERT.
351
all this work a letter3 from Mosewius of Breslau,
a prominent Prussian musician, full of sympathy
and admiration, must have been doubly grati
fying as coming from North Germany.
In July he wrote the 92nd Psalm in Hebrew
for the synagogue at Vienna, of which Sulzer was
precentor. In August, notwithstanding his de
claration on completing his last Symphony, we
find him (under circumstances already described)
composing 7 songs of Rellstab's, and 6 of Heine's,
afterwards issued as ' Schwanengesang.1
He opened September with a trifle in the
shape of a short chorus,* with accompaniment of
wind band, for the consecration of a bell in the
church of the Alservorstadt. A few days after, the
memory of Hummel's visit in the spring of 1827
seems to have come upon him like a lion, and he
wrote off 3 fine PF. solo sonatas, with the view
of dedicating them to that master. These pieces,
though very unequal and in parts extraordinarily
diffuse, are yet highly characteristic of Schu
bert. They contain some of his finest and most
original music, and also his most affecting (e,g.
Andantino, Scherzo and Trio of the A minor
Sonata) ; and if full of disappointment and
wrath, and the gathering gloom of these last few
weeks of his life, they are also saturated with
that nameless personal charm that is at once so
strong and so indescribable. The third of the
three, that in Bb, dated Sept. 26, has perhaps
naore of grace and finish than the other two, and
has now, from the playing of Mme. Schumann,
Mr. Charles Halle, and others, become a great
favourite. The sonatas were not published till
a year after Hummel's death, and were then
dedicated by Diabelli-Spina to Robert Schumann,
who acknowledges the dedication by a genial
though hardly adequate article in his ' Ges.
Schriften,' ii. 239. The second part of the
Winterreise was put into Haslinger's hands for
engraving before the end of this month.5
In October, prompted by some occasion which
has eluded record, he wrote a new ' Benedictus '
to his early Mass in C, a chorus of great beauty
and originality in A minor, of which a com
petent 6 critic has said that ' its only fault con
sists in its immeasurable superiority to the rest
of the Mass.' For some other occasion, which
has also vanished, he wrote accompaniments for
1 3 wind instruments to his grand ' Hymn to the
Holy Ghost'; a long scena or song for soprano —
probably his old admirer, Anna Milder — with
pianoforte and obligate clarinet (op. j 29) ; and a
song called 'DieTaubenpost'C The carrier pigeon')
to Seidl's words. The succession of these pieces
is not known. It is always assumed that the
Taubenpost, which now closes the Schwanen
gesang, was the last. Whichever of them was the
last, was the last piece he ever wrote.
The negotiations with Probst and Schott, and
also with Bruggemann of Halberstadt, a pub-
3 K. H. 428 (ii. 114).
< K. H. 443 (ii. 131). This piece, ' Glaube. Hoffnung, und Liebe,' is
not to be confounded -with one of similar title lor a solo voice, pub
lished, Oct. 6, 1828, as op. 97.
5 Schubert's letter to Jenger. Sept. 25. K. H. 437 (ii. 124).
6 Mr. E. Prout in the Monthly Musical Kecord for 1871, p. 56.
352
SCHUBERT.
lisher anxious for some easy PF. pieces for a
series called ' Miihling's Museum/ by no means
fulfilled the promise of their commencement.
The magnificent style in which the Schotts de
sired Schubert to name his own terms 1 contrasts
badly with their ultimate refusal (Oct. 30) to
pay more than 30 florins (or about 255.) for the
PF. Quintet (op. 114) instead of the modest 60
demanded by him. In fact the sole result was
an arrangement with Probst to publish the long
and splendid Eb Trio, which he did, according
to Nottebohm,2 in September, and for which the
composer received the incredibly small sum of 2 1
Vienna florins, or just 175. 6d. \ Schubert's an
swer to Probst's enquiry as to the 'Dedication 'is
so characteristic as to deserve reprinting : —
Vienna, Aug. 1.
Euer "Wohlgeboren, the opus of the Trio is 100. I
entreat you to make the edition correct ; I am extremely
anxious about it. The work will be dedicated to no one
but those who like it. That is the most profitable de
dication. With all esteem,
FRANZ SCHUBERT.
The home publications of 1828 are not so im
portant as those of former years. The first part
of the Winterreise (op. 89) was issued in January
by Haslinger ; March 14, 3 songs by Sir W.
Scott (ops. 85, 86) by Diabelli; at Easter (April 6)
6 songs (ops. 92 and 108), and one set of 'Mo-
mens musicals,' by Leidesdorf ; in May, 2 songs
(op. 93) by Kienreich3 of Gratz ; in June or
July ('Sommer') 4 songs (op. 96) by Diabelli;
Aug. 13, 4 Refrain-Lieder (op. 95) Weigl. Also
the following, to which no month can be fixed :
— ' Andantino varie' and Rondeau brillant ' (op.
84), PF. 4 hands, on French motifs, forming a
continuation of op. 63, Weigl ; 3 songs (op. 87),
Pennauer ; 4 impromptus (op. 90), and 12 Grat-
zer Walzer (op. 91) for PF. solo, Diabelli ;
Gratzer Galopp, do. Haslinger ; 4 songs (op. 106)
lithographed without publisher's name.
There is nothing in the events already cata
logued to have prevented Schubert's taking an
excursion this summer. In either Styria or
Upper Austria he would have been welcomed with
open arms, and the journey might have given
him a stock of health sufficient to carry him
on for years. And he appears to have enter
tained the idea of both.* But the real obstacle,
as he constantly repeats, was his poverty.5 ' Its
all over with Gratz for the present,' he says,
with a touch of his old fun, 'for money and
weather are both against me.' Herr Franz Lach-
ner, at that time his constant companion, told
the writer, that he had taken half-a-dozen of
the 'Winterreise' songs to Haslinger and brought
back half-a-dozen gulden — each gulden being then
worth a franc. Let the lover of Schubert pause a
moment, and think of the 'Post' or the 'Wirths-
haus' being sold for tenpence ! of that unrivalled
imagination and genius producing those death-
1 K. H. 424 (ii. 109).
2 Probst announces two long lists of new music in the A.M.Z. for
Oct., but no mention of the Trio. It is reviewed most favourably
in the A.M.Z. fur Dec. 10, 1828. Alas! he was then beyond the reach
of praise or blame.
3 Whom Schubert parodies as ' Greiner ' i.e. grumbler.
* Jenger's and Tnvweter's letters, K. H. 416, 427, 431, etc.
0 Letters, K.H. 4S7 (ii. 124). etc.
SCHUBERT.
less strains and being thus rewarded! When
this was the case, when even a great work
like the Eb Trio, after months and months of
negotiation and heavy postage, realises the truly
microscopic amount of ' 20 florins 60 kreutzers '
(as with true Prussian businesslike minuteness
Herr Probst specifies it), of 1 7s. 6cZ. as our modern
currency has it — not even Schubert's fluency and
rapidity could do more than keep body and soul
together. It must have been hard not to apply the
words of Muller's ' Leyermann ' to his own case —
Barfuss auf dem Eise
"Wankt er hin und her,
Und sein Jcleiner Teller
Blcibl ihm immer leer.
"Wandering barefoot to and fro
On the icy ground,
In his little empty tray
Not a copper to be found.
In fact so empty was his little tray that he
could not even afford the diligence-fare to Pesth,
where Lachner's ' Burgschaft ' was to be brought
out, and where, as Schindler reminds him, he
would be safe to have a lucrative concert of his
own music, as profitable as that of March 26.
Escape from Vienna by that road was impossible
for him this year.
Schubert had for some time past been living
with Schober at the ' Blaue Igel ' (or Blue Hedge
hog), still a well-known tavern and resort of
musicians in the Tuchlauben ; but at the end of
August he left, and took up his quarters with
Ferdinand in a new house in the Neue Wieden
suburb, then known as No. 694 Firmian, or
Lumpert,6 or Neugebauten, Gasse, now (1881)
No. 6 Kettenbriicken Gasse ; a long house with
three rows of nine windows in front ; a brown slop
ing tiled roof ; an entry in the middle to a quad
rangle behind ; a quiet, clean, inoffensive place.7
Here, on the second floor, to the right hand,
lived Schubert for the last five weeks of his life,
and his death is commemorated by a stone tablet
over the entry, placed there by the Manner-
gesang Verein in Nov. 1869, and containing these
words : — 'In diesem Hause starb am 19 Novem
ber 1828 der Tondichter Franz Schubert':— In
this house died on Nov. 19, 1828, the composer
Franz Schubert. Ferdinand had removed there,
and Franz, perhaps to help his brother with the
rent, went there too. He made the move with
the concurrence of his doctor, von Rinna, in the
hope that as it was nearer the country — it was just
over the river in the direction of the Belvedere
— Schubert would be able to reach fresh air and
exercise more easily than he could from the heart
of the city. The old attacks of giddiness and
blood to the head had of late been frequent,
and soon after taking up hi.s new quarters he
became seriously unwell. However, this was so
far relieved that at the beginning of October he
made a short walking tour with Ferdinand and
two other friends to Ueber-Waltersdorf, and
thence to Haydn's old residence and grave at
Eisenstadt, some 25 miles from Vienna. It took
8 EL H. 453 note.
i It is quite a musical spot. 'Franz Haydn' has a shop for comes
tibles at the corner of the next house to Schubert's.
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
353
them three days, and during that time he was
very careful as to eating and drinking, regained
his old cheerfulness, and was often very gay.
Still he was far from well, and after his return
the bad symptoms revived, to the great alarm of
his friends. At length, on the evening of Oct. 3 1,
while at supper at the Rothen Kreuz in the Him-
melpfortgrund, an eating-house much frequented
by himself and his friends, he took some fish on his
plate, but at the first mouthful threw down the
knife and fork, and exclaimed that it tasted like
poison. From that moment hardly anything
hut medicine passed his lips ; but he still walked
a good deal. About this time Lachner returned
from Pesth in all the glory of the success of his
opera ; and though only in Vienna for a few
days, he called on his friend, and they had two
hours' conversation. Schubert was full of plans
for the future, especially for the completion of
'Graf von Gleichen,' which, as already mentioned,
he had sketched in the summer of 1827. He
discussed it also with Bauernfeld during the next
few days, and spoke of the brilliant style in
which he intended to score it. About this time
Carl Holz, Beethoven's old friend, at Schubert's
urgent request, took him to hear the great
master's Cjf minor Quartet, still a novelty in
Vienna. It agitated him extremely. ' He got
(says Holz) into such a state of excitement and
enthusiasm that we were all afraid for him.' l On
the 3rd Nov., the morrow of All Souls' day, he
walked early in the morning to Hernals — then a
village, now a thickly built suburb outside the
Giirtelstrasse — to hear his brother's Latin Re
quiem in the church there. He thought it simple,
and at the same time effective, and on the whole
was much pleased with it. After the service
he walked for three hours, and on reaching home
complained of great weariness.
Shortly before this time the scores of Handel's
oratorios had come into his hands — not impossibly
some of the set of Arnold's edition given to Bee
thoven before his death, and sold in his sale for
102 florins ; and the study of them had brought
home to him his deficiencies in the department of
counterpoint. 'I see now,' said he2 to the Froh-
lichs, 'how much I have still to learn ; but I am
going to work hard with Sechter, and make up
for lost time ' — Sechter being the recognised
authority of the day on counterpoint. So much
was he bent on this, that on the day after his
walk to Hernals, i. e. on Nov. 4, notwithstanding
his weakness, he went into Vienna and, with
another musician named Lanz, called on Sechter,
to consult him on the matter, and they actually
decided on Marpurg as the text-book, and on the
number and dates of the lessons.3 But he never
began the course. During the next few days he
grew weaker and weaker ; and when the doctor
was called in, it was too late. About the nth
he wrote a note * to Schober — doubtless his last
letter.
1 Quoted by Nohl, 'Beethoven,' iii. 961. Holz says It was the last
music that poor Schubert heard. Ferdinand claims the same for his
Requiem. At any rate both were very near the end.
2 Kreissle's Sketch, p. 152.
3 K.H. 451 (ii. 138), expressly on Sechter's authority.
•1 Given by Bauernfeld, in Die Presse, Ap. 2], 1869.
VOL. III. PT. 3.
DEAR SCHOBER,
I am ill. I have eaten and drunk nothing for eleven
days, and am so tired and shaky that I can only get
from the bed to the chair, and back. Rinna is attending
me. If I taste anything, I bring it up again directly.
In this distressing condition, be so kind as to help me to
some reading. Of Cooper's I have read the Last of the
Mohicans, the Spy, the Pilot, and the Pioneers. If you
have anything else of his, I entreat you to leave it with
Frau von Bogner at the Coffee house My brother, who
is conscientiousness itself, will bring it to me in the
most conscientious way. Or anything else. Tour friend,
. SCHUBERT.
What answer Schober made to this appeal is not
known. He is said to have had a daily report of
Schubert's condition from the doctor, but there
is no mention of his having called. Spaun, Rand-
hartinger,5 Bauernfeld, and Josef Hiittenbrenner,
are all said to have visited him ; but in those days
there was great dread of infection, his new resi
dence was out of the way, and dangerous illness
was such a novelty with Schubert that his friends
may be excused for not thinking the case so grave
as it was. After a few days Rinna himself fell
ill, and his place was filled by a staff-surgeon
named Behring.
On the 1 4th Schubert took to his bed.6 He
was able to sit up a little for a few days longer,
and thus to correct the proofs of the 2nd part of
the ' Winterreise,' probably the last occupation
of those inspired and busy fingers. He appears
to have had no pain, only increasing weakness,
want of sleep, and great depression. Poor fellow !
no wonder he was depressed ! everything was
against him, his weakness, his poverty, the
dreary house, the long lonely hours, the cheerless
future — all concentrated and embodied in the
hopeless images of Miiller's poems, and the sad
gloomy strains in which he has clothed them for
ever and ever — the Letzte Hotfhung, the Krahe,
the Wegweiser, the Wirthshaus, the Nebensonnen,
the Leiermann — all breathing of solitude, broken
hopes, illusions, strange omens, poverty, death, the
grave ! As he went through the pages, they must
have seemed like pictures of his own life ; and
such passages as the following, from the Weg
weiser (or Signpost), can hardly have failed to
strike the dying man as aimed at himself : —
Einen "Weiser seh' ich stehen,
UnverrUckt vor meinem Blick,
Eine Strasse muss ich gehen,
Die noch Jceiner ging zuriick.
Straight before me stands a signpost,
Steadfast in my very gaze ;
'Tis the road none e'er retraces,
'Tis the road that I must tread.
Alas ! he was indeed going the road which no
one e'er retraces ! On Sunday the i6th the doctors
had a consultation ; they predicted a nervous
fever, but had still hopes of their patient. On
the afternoon of Monday, Bauernfeld saw him
for the last time. He was in very bad spirits, and
complained of great weakness, and of heat in his
head, but his mind was still clear, and there was
no sign of wandering ; he spoke of his earnest
wish tor a good opera-book. Later in the day,
s FrSulein Geisler informs me that Ferdinand's wife (sti'l living.
1882) maintains that Bandhartinger was the only one who visited
him during his illness ; but it is difficult to resist the statements
of Bauernfeld (Presse, Ap. 21, 1869) and of KreissVe's informants, p. 452
(ii. 140).
6 Ferdinand, in the X.2.M. p. 143.
A a
354
SCHUBERT.
however, when the doctor arrived, he was quite
delirious, and typhus had unmistakeably broken
out. The next day, Tuesday, he was very restless
throughout, trying continually to get out of bed,
and constantly fancying himself in a strange
room. That evening he called Ferdinand on to
the bed, made him put his ear close to his mouth,
and whispered mysteriously ' What are they doing
with me ?' ' Dear Franz,' was the reply, ' they are
doing all they can to get you well again, and the
doctor assures us you will soon be right, only
you must do your best to stay in bed.' He re
turned to the idea in his wandering — ' I implore
you to put me in my own room, and not to leave
me in this corner under the earth ; don't I de
serve a place above ground ? ' ' Dear Franz,' said
the agonised brother, ' be calm ; trust your bro
ther Ferdiinand, whom you have always trusted,
and who loves you so dearly. You are in the
room which you always had, and lying on your
own bed.' 'No,' said the dying man, ' that's not
true; Beethoven is not here.' So strongly had
the great composer taken possession of him !• An
hour or two later the doctor came, and spoke to
him in the same style. Schubert looked him
full in the face and made no answer ; but turning
round clutched at the wall with his poor tired
hands, and said in a slow earnest voice, ' Here,
here, is my end.' At 3 in the afternoon of Wed
nesday the I9th Nov. 1828 he breathed his last,
and his simple earnest soul took its flight from
the world. He was 31 years, 9 months, and 19
days old. There never has been one like him,
and there never will be another.
His death, and the letters of the elder Franz
and of Ferdinand, bring out the family rela
tions in a very pleasant light. The poor pious
bereaved father, still at his drudgery as ' school
teacher in the Rossau,' ' afflicted, yet strengthened
by faith in God and the Blessed Sacraments,'
writing to announce the loss of his ' beloved
son, Franz Schubert, musician and .com
poser ' ; the good innocent Ferdinand, evidently
recognised as Franz's peculiar property, clinging
to his brother as the one great man he had ever
known ; thinking only of him, and of fulfilling
his last wish to lie near Beethoven, and ready to
sacrifice all hi£ scanty savings to do it — these form
a pair of interesting figures. Neither Ignaz nor
Carl appear at all in connexion with the event,
the father and Ferdinand alone are visible.
The funeral took place on Friday Nov. 21. It
was bad weather, but a number of friends and
sympathisers assembled. He lay in his coffin,
dressed, as the custom then was, like a hermit,
with a crown of laurel round his brows. The
face was calm, and looked more like sleep than
death. By desire of the family Schober was chief
mourner. The coffin left the house at half-past
two, and was borne by a group of young men,
'students and others, in red cloaks and flowers,
to the little church of S. Joseph in Margarethen,
where the funeral service was said, and a motet
by Gansbacher, and a hymn of Schober's, 'Der
Friede sey mit dir, du engelreine Seele' — written
that morning in substitution for his own earlier
SCHUBERT.
•words, to the music of Schubert's 'Pax vobiscum'
— were sung over the coffin. It was then taken
to the Ortsfriedhof in the village of Wahring, and
committed to the ground, three1 places higher up
than the grave of Beethoven. In ordinary course
he would have been buried in the cemeter}7 at
Matzleinsdorf, b'ut the appeal which he made
almost with his dying breath was naturally a law
to the tender heart of Ferdinand, and through his
piety and self-denial his dear brother rests, if not
next, yet near to the great musician, whom he so
deeply reverenced and admired. Late in the after
noon Wilhelm von Chezy, son of the authoress of
Euryanthe and Rosamunde, who though not in
Schubert's intimate circle was yet one of his ac
quaintances, by some accident remembered that he
had not seen him for many months, and he walked
down to Bogner's coffee-house, where the com
poser was usually to be found between 5 and 7,
smoking his pipe and joking with his friends, and
where the Cooper's novels mentioned in his note
to Schober were not improbably still waiting for
him. He found the little room almost empty, and
the familiar round table deserted. On entering
he was accosted by the waiter — 'Your honour is
soon back from the funeral ! ' ' Whose funeral ? '
said Chezy in astonishment. ' Franz Schubert's,'
replied the waiter, ' he died two days ago, and is
buried this afternoon.'2
He left no will. The official inventory 3 of his
possessions at the time of his death, in which he
is described as 'Tonkunstle-r und Compositeur ' —
musician and composer — is as follows : — 'Three
dress coats, 3 walking coats, i o pairs of trowsers,
9 waistcoats — together worth 37 florins ; I hat,
5 pairs of shoes and 2 of boots — valued at 2
florins ; 4 shirts, 9 cravats and pocket handker
chiefs, 13 pairs of socks, I towel, I sheet, 2 bed-
cases — 8 florins ; I mattrass, I bolster, i quilt—
6 florins; a quantity of old music valued at 10
florins — 63 florins (say £2 ios.) in all. Beyond
the above there were no effects.' Is it possible,
then, that in the 'old music, valued at 8s. 6d.,'
are included the whole of his unpublished manu
scripts ? Where else could they be but in the house
he was inhabiting ?
The expenses of the illness and funeral, though
the latter is especially mentioned as ' second
class,' amounted in all to 269 silver florins, 19
kr. (say £27) — a heavy sum for people in the
poverty of Ferdinand and his father. Of this the
preliminary service cost 84 fl. 35 kr. ; the burial
44 fl. 45 kr. ; and the ground 70 fl. ; leaving the
rest for the doctor's fees and incidental disburse
ments. Illness and death were truly expensive
luxuries in those days.
On the 2yth Nov. the Kirchen-musikverein
performed Mozart's Requiem in his honour; and
on Dec. 23 a requiem by Anselm Hiittenbrenner
was given in the Augustine church. On the i4th
Dec. his early Symphony in C, No 6, was played
1 Next to Beethoven comes Treiherr von Wsserd'; then 'Job.
raf O'Donel and GrSfin O'Donnell,' and then Schubert.
2 Wilhelm von Chezy, ' Erinnerungen aus meiuen Leben ' (1863),
182, m
3 Given at length by Kreissle (p. 457)— but entirely omitted in the
translation— and materially misquoted by Gumprecht (p. 15).
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
355
at the Gesellschafts concert, and again on March
12, 1829. At Linz on Christmas Day there was
a funeral ceremony with speeches and music.
Articles in his honour appeared in the 'Wiener
Zeitschriffc ' of Dec. 25 (by von Zedlitz), in the
' Theaterzeitung ' of Vienna of the 2oth and 27th
(by Blahetka) ; in the Vienna ' Zeitschrift fur
Kunst ' of June 9, 1 1, 13, 1829 (by Bauernfeld) ;
in the Vienna ' Archiv fiir Geschichte ' (by
Mayrhofer) ; and memorial poems were published
by Seidl, Schober, and others. On Jan. 30, 1829,
a concert was given by the arrangement of Anna
Frohlich in the hall of the Musikverein ; the
programme included ' Miriam/ and consisted
entirely of Schubert's music, excepting a set of
Flute variations by Gabrielsky, and the first
Finale in Don Juan ; and the crowd was so
great that the performance had to be repeated
shortly afterwards. The proceeds of these con
certs and the subscriptions of a few friends sufficed
to erect the monument which now stands at the
back of the grave. It was carried out by Anna
Frohlich, Grillparzer, and Jenger. The bust was
by Franz Dialler, and the cost of the whole was
360 silver florins, 46 kr. The inscription1 is from
the pen of Grillparzer : —
DIE TONKUNST BEGRUB HIER EINEN REICHEN BESITZ
ABER NOCH VIEL SCHOENERE HOFFNUNGEN.
FRANZ SCHUBERT LIEGT HIER.
GEBOREN AM XXXI. JJENNER MDCCXCVII.
GESTORBEN AM XIX. NOV. MDCCCXXVIII.
XXXI JAHRE ALT.
MUSIC HAS HERE ENTOMBED A RICH TREASURE,
BUT STILL FAIRER HOPES.
FRANZ SCHUBERT LIES HERE.
BORN JAN. 31, 1797;
DIED NOV. 19, 1828,
31 YEARS -OLD.
The allusion to fairer hopes has been much
criticised, but surely without reason. When we
remember in how many departments of music
Schubert's latest productions were his best, we
are undoubtedly warranted in believing that he
would have gone on progressing for many years,
had it been the will of God to spare him.
In 1863, owing to the state of dilapidation at
which the graves of both Beethoven and Schubert
had arrived, the repair of the tombs, and the ex
humation and reburial of both, were xmdertaken
by the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde. The
operation was begun on the 12 th October and
completed on the I3th. The opportunity was
embraced of taking a cast and a photograph of
Schubert's skull, and of measuring the principal
bones of both skeletons. The lengths in Schu
bert's case were to those in Beethoven's as 27 to
20,,2 which implies that as Beethoven was 5 ft. f, in.
high, he was only 5 ft. and ^ an inch.
Various memorials have been set np to hrm in
A' ienna. The tablets on the houses in which he
was born and died have been noticed. They were
1 We have given the inscription exactly as it stands on the monu
ment. Kreissle's version (463), followed by Gumprecht and others, is
incorrect in almost every line.
2 See ' Actenmassige Darstellung der Ausgrabung und Wieder-
beeisetzungderirdiscben Reste von Beethoven und Schubert.' Vienna,
Gerold, 1863.
both carried out by the Mannergesang Verein,
and completed, the former Oct. 7, 1858, the latter
in Nov. 1869. The same Society erected by sub
scription a monument to him in the Stadt-Park ;
a sitting figure in Carrara marble by Carl Kunt-
mann, with the inscription ' Franz Schubert,
seinem Andenken der Wiener Mannergesang-
verein, 1872.' It cost 42,000 florins, and was
unveiled May 15, 1872.
Outside of Austria his death created at first
but little sensation. Robert Schumann, then 18,
is said to have been deeply affected, and to have
burst into tears when the news reached him at
Leipzig ; Mendelssohn too, though unlike Schubert
in temperament, circumstances and education,
doubtless fully estimated his loss ; and Rellstab,
Anna Milder, and others in Berlin who knew him,
must have mourned him deeply; but the world
at large did not yet know enough of his works
to understand either what it possessed or what
it had lost in that modest reserved young mu
sician of 31. But Death always brings a man,
especially a young man, into notoriety, and in
creases public curiosity about his works : and so
it was now ; the stream of publication at once
began, and is even yet flowing, neither the sup
ply of works nor the eagerness to obtain them
having ceased. The world has not yet recovered
from its astonishment as, one after another, the
stores accumulated in those dusky heaps of music
paper (valued at 8s. 6d.) were made public, each so
astonishingly fresh, copious, and different from the
last. As songs, masses, part-songs, operas, cham
ber-music of all sorts and all dimensions — piano
forte-sonatas, impromptus and fantasias, duets,
trios, quartets, quintet, octet, issued from the
press or were heard in manuscript ; as each season
brought its new symphony, overture, entr'acte,
or ballet-music, people began to be staggered
by the amount. 'A deep shade of suspicion,'
said a leading musical periodical in 1839, 'is
beginning to be cast over the authenticity of
posthumous compositions. All Paris has been in
a state of amazement at the posthumous diligence
of the song-writer, F. Schubert, who, while one
would think that his ashes repose in peace in
Vienna, is still making eternal new songs.' We
know better now, but it must be confessed that
the doubt was not so unnatural then.
Of the MS. music — an incredible quantity, of
which no one then knew the amount or the par
ticulars, partly because there was so much of it,
partly because Schubert concealed, or rather forgot,
a great deal of his work — a certain number of songs
and pianoforte pieces were probably in the hands
of publishers at the time of his death, but the great
bulk was in the possession of Ferdinand, as his
heir. A set of 4 songs (op. 105) was issued on
the day of his funeral. Other songs — ops. 101,
104, 106, 110-112, 116-118; andtwoPF. Duets,
the Fantasia in F minor (op. 103) and the
'Grand Rondeau' (op. 107) — followed up to
April 1829. But the first important publication
v.as the well-known ' Schwanengesang,' so en
titled by Haslinger — a collection of 14 songs,
Aa2
356
SCHUBERT.
7 by Rellstab, 6 by Heine, and I by Seidl —
unquestionably Schubert's last. They were issued
in May 1829, and, to judge by the lists of ar
rangements and editions given by Nottebohm,
have been as much appreciated as the Schone
Miillerin or the Winterreise. A stream of songs
followed — for which we must refer the student
to Mr. Nottebohm's catalogue. The early part l
of 1830 saw the execution of a bargain between
Diabelli and Ferdinand, by which that Firm was
guaranteed the property of the following works : —
op. 1-32, 35, 39-59' 62, 63> 64, 66-69, 71-77,
84-88, 92-99, 101-104, 106, 108, 109, 113, 115,
116, 119,121-124, 127, 128, 130, 132-140, 142-
153; also 154 songs; 14 vocal quartets; the
canons of 1813; a cantata in C for 3 voices;
the Hymn to the Holy Ghost ; Klopstock's Stabat
Mater in F minor, and Grosse Halleluja ; Mag
nificat in C ; the String Quintet in C ; 4 string
quartets in C, Bb, G, Bb ; a string trio in Bb ; 2
sonatas in A and A minor, variations in F, an
Adagio in Db, and Allegretto in Cfl — all for PF.
solo ; Sonata for PF. and Arpeggione ; Sonata
in A, and Fantasie in C — both for PF. and violin ;
Rondo in A for violin and quartet ; Adagio and
Rondo in F, for PF. and quartet ; a Concert-
piece in D for violin and orchestra ; Overture
in D for orchestra ; Overture to 3rd Act of the
' Zauberharfe * ; Lazarus ; a Tantum ergo in Eb
for 4 voices and orchestra ; an Offer tori um in Bb
for tenor solo, chorus and orchestra.
Another large portion of Ferdinand's posses
sions came, sooner or later, into the hands of
Dr. Eduard Schneider, son of Franz's sister
Theresia. They comprised the autographs of
Symphonies i, 2, 3, and 6, and copies of 4 and
5 ; Autographs of operas : — the ' TeufeVs Lust-
schloss,' 'Fernando,' 'Der Vierjahrige Posten,'
' Die Freunde von Salamanka,' ' Die Biirgschaft,'
' Fierabras,* and ' Sakontala ' ; the Mass in F ;
and the original orchestral parts of the whole of
the music to ' Rosamunde.' The greater part of
these are now (1882) safe in the possession of Herr
Nicholas Dumba of Vienna.
On July 10, 1830, Diabelli began the issue of
what was termed Schubert's ' Musical Remains '
(musikalische Nachlass), though confined to songs;
and continued it at intervals till 1850, by which
time 50 Parts (Lieferungen), containing 137 songs,
had appeared. In 1830 he also issued the two
astonishing 4-hand marches (op. 121) ; and a set
of 20 waltzes (op. 127); whilst other houses
published the PF. Sonatas in A and Eb (op. 1 20,
122) ; two string quartets of the year 1824 (op.
1 25) ; the D minor Quartet, etc. For the progress
of the publication after this date we must again
refer the reader to Mr. Nottebohm's invaluable
Thematic Catalogue (Vienna, Schreiber, 1874),
which contains every detail, and may be implicitly
relied on; merely mentioning the principal works,
and the year of publication : — Miriam, Mass in
l The list which follows Is taken from Kreissle, p. 566 (ii. 245). who
apparently had the original document before him. The only date
given by Kreissle is 1830, hut it must have been early in that year,
since op. 121, which forms part of the bargain, was issued in
February. Some of the numbers in the list had already been issued
as the property of the publishers.
SCHUBERT.
Bb, 3 last Sonatas and the Grand Duo, 1838;
Symphony in C, 1840 ; Phantasie in C, PF. and
violin, 1850 ; Quartet in G, 1852 ; Quintet in C,
and Octet, 1854; Gesang der Geister, 1858;
Verschworenen, 1862; Mass in Eb, 1865;
Lazarus, 1866; Symphony in B minor, 1867;
Mass in Ab, 1875.
No complete critical edition of Schubert's
works has yet been undertaken. Of the piano
forte pieces and songs there are numberless publi
cations, for which the reader is referred to Mr.
Nottebohm's Thematic Catalogue. Of the Songs
two collections may be signalised as founded on
the order of opus numbers : — that of Senff of
Leipzig, edited by Julius Rietz, 361 songs in 20
vols., and that of Litolff of Brunswick — songs in
10 vols. But neither of these, though styled
' complete,' are so. For instance, each omits ops.
83, no, 129, 165, 172, 173; the 6 songs pub
lished by Miiller, the 40 by Gotthard ; and Litolff
also omits ops. 21, 60. Still, as the nearest to
completeness, these have been used as the basis
of List No. I. at the end of this article.
Schumann's visit to Vienna in the late autumn
of 1838 formed an epoch in the history of the
Schubert music. He saw the immense heap of
MSS. which remained in Ferdinand's hands even
after the mass bought by Diabelli had been taken
away, and amongst them several symphonies.
Such sympathy and enthusiasm as his must have
been a rare delight to the poor desponding
brother. His eagle eye soon discovered the worth
of these treasures. He picked out several works to
be recommended to publishers, but meantime one
beyond all the rest rivetted his attention — the
great symphony of March 1828 (was it the auto
graph, not yet deposited in the safe-keeping of
the Gesellschaft derMusikfreunde, or a copy?) and
he arranged with Ferdinand to send a transcript
of it to Leipzig to Mendelssohn for the Gewand-
haus Concerts, where it was produced Mar. 21,
i839,2 an(i repeated no less than 3 times during
the following season. His chamber-music was
becoming gradually known in the North, and as
early as 1833 is occasionally met with in the
Berlin and Leipzig programmes. David, who
led the taste in chamber music at the latter place,
was devoted toSchubert. He gradually introduced
his works, until there were few seasons in which the
Quartets in A minor, D minor (the score of which
he edited for Senff), and G, the String Quintet
in C (a special favourite), the Octet, both Trios, the
PF. Quintet, and the Rondeau brillant, were not
performed amid great applause, at his concerts.
Schumann had long been a zealous Schubert pro
pagandist. From an early date his Zeitschrift
contains articles of more or less length, always
inspired by an ardent admiration ; Schubert's
letters and poems and his brother's excellent short
sketch of his life, printed in vol. x (Ap. 23 to May 3,
1839) — obvious fruits of Schumann's Vienna
visit — are indispensable materials for Schubert's
2 March 22 in the Allg. Mus. Zeitung, March 21 in Schumann's paper.
Misled by the former the date is given in the biography of Mendels
sohn as the 22nd. [Vol. ii. 2756.] The reader will please correct
this. The Symphony was repeated Dec. 12, 1839. March 19 and April 3,.
1840. Mendelssohn made a few cuts in the work for performance.
SCHUBERT.
biography; when the Symphony was performed he
dedicated to it one of his longest and most genial
effusions,1 and each fresh piece was greeted with
a hearty welcome as it fell from the press. One
of Schumann's especial favourites was the Eb
Trio ; he liked it even better than that in Bb,
and has left a memorandum of his fondness in
the opening of the Adagio of his Symphony in C,
which is identical, in key and intervals, with that
of Schubert's Andante. The enthusiasm of these
prominent musicians, the repeated performances
of the Symphony, and its publication byBreitkopfs
(in Jan. 1850), naturally gave Schubert a strong
hold on Leipzig, at that time the most active
musical centre of Europe ; and after the founda
tion of the Conservatorium in 1843 many English
and American students must have carried back
the love of his romantic and tuneful music to their
own countries.
Several performances of large works had taken
place in Vienna since Schubert's death, chiefly
through the exertions of Ferdinand, and of a
certain Leitermayer, one of Franz's early friends ;
such as the Eb Mass at the parish church of
Maria Trost on Nov. 15, 1829 ; Miriam, with
Lachner's orchestration, at a Gesellschaft Concert
in 1830; two new overtures in 1833; an over
ture in E, the Chorus of Spirits from Rosamunde,
the Grosses Halleluja, etc., early in 1835, and four
large concerted pieces from Fierabras later in
the year ; an overture in D ; the finale of the last
Symphony ; a march and chorus, and an air and
chorus, from Fierabras, in April 1836; another new
overture, and several new compositions from the
'Remains, 'in the winter of 1837-8. As far as can
be judged by the silence of the Vienna newspapers
these passed almost unnoticed. Even the competi
tion with North Germany failed to produce the
effect which might have been expected. It did
indeed excite the Viennese to one effort. On the
15th of the December following the production of
the Symphony at Leipzig its performance was at
tempted at Vienna, but though the whole work
was announced,2 such had been the difficulties at
rehearsal that the first two movements alone
were given, and they were only carried off by the
interpolation of an air from ' Lucia ' between
them.
But symphonies and symphonic works can
hardly be expected to float rapidly ; songs are
more buoyant, and Schubert's songs soon began
to make their way outside, as they had long since
done in his native place. Wherever they once
penetrated their success was certain. In Paris,
where spirit, melody, and romance are the certain
criterions of success, and where nothing dull
or obscure is tolerated, they were introduced by
Nourrit, and were so much liked as actually to
find a transient place in the programmes of the
1 ' Ges. Schriften,' iii. 195. Schumann's expressions leave no doubt
that the Symphony in C was in Ferdinand's possession at the time of
his visit. This and many other of his articles on Schubert have been
translated into English by Miss M. E. von Glehn, and Mrs. Hitter.
2 The MS. parts in the possession of the Musik Verein show the
most cruel cuts, possibly with a view to this performance. In the
Finale, one of the most essential and effective sections of the move
ment is clean expunged.
SCHUBERT.
357
Concerts of the Conservatoire, the stronghold of
musical Toryism.3 The first French collection
was published in 1834, by Richault, with trans
lation by Be'langer. It contained 6 songs — Die
Post, Standchen, Am Meer, Das Fischermadchen,
Der Tod und das Madchen, and Schlummer-
lied. The Erl King and others followed. A larger
collection, with translation by Emil Deschamps,
was issued by Brandus in 1 838 or 39. It is entitled
'Collection des Lieder de Franz Schubert/ and
contains 16 — La jeune religieuse; Marguerite;
Le roi des aulnes ; La rose ; La sdrdnade ; La
poste; A ve Maria; La cloche des agonisants ; La
jeune fille et la mort; Rosemonde; Les plaintes
de la jeune fille; Adieu; Les astres ; La jeune
mere; La berceuse; Eloge des larmes.4 Except
that one — Adieu5 — is spurious, the selection
does great credit to Parisian taste. This led the
way to the ' Qnarante melodies de Schubert ' of
Richault, Launer, etc., a thin 8vo. volume, to
which many an English amateur is indebted for his
first acquaintance with these treasures of life.
By 1845 Richault had published as many as 150
with French words.
Some of the chamber music also soon obtained
a certain popularity in Paris, through the playing
of Tilmant, Urhan, and Alkan, and later of Alard
and Franchomme. The Trio in Bb, issued by
Richault in 1838, was the first instrumental work
of Schubert's published in France. There is a
'Collection complete' of the solo PF. works,
published by Richault in 8vo., containing the
Fantaisie (op. 15), 10 sonatas, the two Russian
marches, Impromptus, Momens musicals, 5 single
pieces, and 9 sets of dances. Liszt and Heller
kept the flame alive by their transcriptions of
the songs and waltzes. But beyond this the
French hardly know more of Schubert now than
they did then ; none of his large works have be
come popular with them. Habeneck attempted
to rehearse the Symphony in C (No. 10) in 1842,
but the band refused to go beyond the first
movement, and Schubert's name up to this date
(1881) appears in the programmes of the Con
certs of the Conservatoire attached to three
songs only. M. Pasdeloup has introduced the
Symphony in C and the fragments of that in
B minor, but they have taken no hold on the
Parisian amateurs.
Liszt's devotion to Schubert has been great
and unceasing. We have already mentioned his
production of Alfonso and Estrella at Weimar
in 1854, but it is right to give a list of his
transcriptions, which have done a very great
deal to introduce Schubert into many quarters
where his compositions would otherwise have
been a sealed book. His first transcription —
3 'La jeune Eeligieuse' and 'Le rol des Aulnes' were sung by
Nourrit, at the Concerts of Jan. 18 and April 26, 1835, respectively—
the latter with orchestral accompaniment. On March 20, 1836, Mar
guerite was sung by Mile. Falcon, and there the list stops. Schubert's
name has never again appeared in these programmes, to any piece,
vocal or instrumental.
4 This list is copied from the Paris correspondence of the A.MVZ.,
1839. p. 394.
s This song is made up of phrases from Schubert's songs, and will
probably always be attributed to him. It stands even in Pauer s
edition. But it is by A. H. von Weyrauch, who published it himself
in 1824. See Nottebohm's Catalogue, p. 254.
358
SCHUBERT.
Die Rose, op. 73 — was made in * 1834, an(^ aP~
peared in Paris the same year. It was fol
lowed in 1838 by the Standchen, Post, and Lob
der Thranen, and in 1839 bY the Erl Kin° and.by
1 2 Lieder. These again by 6 Lieder ; 4 Geist-
liche Lieder ; 6 of the Miillerlieder ; the Schwan-
engesang, and the Winterreise. Liszt has also
transcribed the Divertissement a la hongroise, 3
Marches and 9 ' Valses-caprices,' or 'Soirees de
Vienne,' after Schubert's op. 67. All the above
are for PF. solo. He has also scored the accom
paniment to the Junge Nonne, Gretchen am
Spinnrade, So lasst mich scheinen, and the Erl
King, for a small orchestra; has adapted the
Allmacht for tenor solo, male chorus, and or
chestra, and has converted the Fantasie in C (op.
15) into a Concerto for PF. and orchestra. Some
will think these changes indefensible, but there
is no doubt that they are done in a masterly
manner, and that many of them have become
very popular. — Heller's arrangements are con
fined to 6 favourite songs.
England made an appearance in the field with
2 songs, ' The Letter of flowers ' and ' The Secret,'
which were published by Mr. Ayrton in 1836 in
the Musical Library, to Oxenford's translation.
Mr. Wessel (Ashdown & Parry) had begun his
' Series of German Songs ' earlier than this,
and by 1840, out of a total of 197, the list in
cluded 38 of Schubert's, remarkably well chosen,
and including several of the finest though less
known ones, e. g. Ganymed, An den Tod, Sei
mir gegriisst, Die Rose, etc., etc. Ewer's ' Gems
of German Song,' containing many of Schu
bert's, were begun in 1836. Schubert's music
took a long time before it obtained any public
footing in this country. The first time it ap
pears in the Philharmonic programmes — then so
ready to welcome novelties — is on May 20, 1839,
when Ivanoff sang the Serenade in the Schwanen-
gesang to Italian words, ' Quando avvolto.'
Staudigl gave the Wanderer, May 8, 1843. On
June 10, 1844, the Overture to Fierabras was
played under Mendelssohn's direction, and on
June 17 the Junge Nonne was sung to French
words by M. de Revial, Mendelssohn playing the
magnificent accompaniment. We blush to say,
however, that neither piece met with approval.
The leading critic says that ' the overture is
literally beneath criticism : perhaps a more over
rated man never existed than this same Schubert.'
His dictum on the song is even more unfortunate.
He tells us that ' it is a very good exemplification
of much ado about nothing — as unmeaningly
mysterious as could be desired by the most de
voted lover of bombast.' Mendelssohn conducted
the last five Philharmonic concerts of that season
(1844); and amongst other orchestral music new
to England had brought with him Schubert's
Symphony in C, and his own overture to Ruy
Bias. At the rehearsal however the behaviour
of the band towards the symphony — excited, it is
said, by the continual triplets in the Finale^- was
i These particulars are taken partly from Miss Eamann's Life of
Liszt, and partly from Liszt's Thematic Catalogue. The third No. of
the ' Apparitions ' is foucded on a Waltz melody of Schubert's.
SCHUBERT.
so insulting that he refused either to go on with
it or to allow his own overture to be tried.2
But the misbehaviour of our leading orche.stra
did not produce the effect which it had done in
Paris ; others were found to take up the treasures
thus rudely rejected, and Schubert has had an
ample revenge. The centres for his music in
England have been — for the orchestral and choral
works, the Crystal Palace, Sydenham, and Mr.
Charles Halle's Concerts, Manchester ; and for
the chamber music, the Monday and Saturday
Popular Concerts and Mr. Halle's Recitals. At
the Crystal Palace the Symphony in C (No. 10)
has been in the re'pertoire of the Saturday Con
certs since April 5, 1856 ; the two movements of
the B minor Symphony were first played April 6,
1867, and have been constantly repeated. The
6 other MS. Symphonies were obtained from Dr.
Schneider in 1 867 and since, and have been played
at various dates, a performance of the whole eight
in chronological order forming a feature in the
series of 1880-81. The Rosamunde music was
first played Nov. 10, 1866, and has been fre
quently repeated since. Joachim's orchestration
of the Grand Duo (op. 140) was given March 4,
1876. The overtures to Alfonso and Estrella,
Fierabras, Freunde von Salamanka, Teufels
Lustschloss, and that 'in the Italian style' are
continually heard. Miriam's song was first given
Nov. 14, 1868 (and three times since) ; the Con
spirators, March 2, 1872 ; the 23rd Psalm, Feb.
21, 1874; the Eb Mass, March 29, 1879. At
the Popular Concerts a beginning was made May
16, 1859, with the A minor Quartet, the D major
Sonata, and the Rondeau brillant. Since then the
D minor and Gr major Quartets, many sonatas and
other PF. pieces have been added, and the Octet,
the Quintet in C, and the two Trios are repeated
season by season, and enthusiastically -received.
The Quartet • in Bb, a MS. trio in the same
key, the Sonata for PF. and Arpeggione, eto.
have been brought to a hearing. A large num
ber of songs are familiar to the subscribers to
these concerts through the fine interpretation
of Stockhausen, Mad. Joachim, Miss Regan, Miss
Sophie Lowe, Mr. Santley, Mr. Henschel, and
other singers. At Mr. Halle's admirable recitals
at St. James's Hall, since their commencement
in 1863 all the published Sonatas have been re
peatedly played ; not only the popular ones, but of
those less known none have been given less than
twice ; the Fantasia in C, op. 15, three times ; the
PF. Quintet, the Fantasia for PF. and Violin,
the Impromptus and Momens musicals, the '5
pieces,' the ' 3 pieces,' the Adagio and Rondo,
the Valses nobles, and other numbers of this fasci
nating music have been heard again and again.
The other principal publications ,in England
are the vocal scores of the six Masses, the PF.
2 Even 15 years later, when played at the Musical Society of Lon
don, the same periodical that we have already quoted says of it,
' The ideas throughout it are all of a minute character, and the
instrumentation is of a piece with the ideas. There is no breadth,
there is no grandeur, there is no dignity in either ; clearness, and
contrast, and beautiful finish are always apparent, but the or
chestra, though loud, is never massive and sonorous, and the music,
though always correct, is never serious or imposing.' Is it possible
for criticism to be more hopelessly wrong?
SCHUBERT.
accompaniment arranged from the full score by
Ebenezer Prout, published by Augener & Co. —
the ist, and, 3rd, 4th in 1871, the 6th (Eb) in 1872,
and the 5th (Ab) in I875-1 The Masses have
been also published by Novellos, both with
Latin and English words (' Communion Ser
vice'); and the same firm has published
Miriam, in two forms, and the Rosaniunde
music, both vocal score and orchestral parts.
Messrs. Augener have also published editions
of the PF. works*, and of a large number of
songs, by Pauer.
Schubert was not sufficiently important during
his lifetime to attract the attention of painters,
and although he had more than one artist in
his circle, there are but three portraits of him
known. I. A poor stiff head by Leopold Kupel-
wieser, full face, taken July 10, 1821, photo
graphed by Mietke and Wawra of Vienna, and
wretchedly engraved as the frontispiece to
Kreissle's biography. 2. A very characteristic
half-length, 3-qimrter-face, in water colours, by
W. A.Rieder,takenini825, and now in possession
of Dr. Granitsch of Vienna.2 A replica by the
artist, dated 1840, is now in the Musik-Verein.
It has been engraved by Passini, and we here
give the head, from a photograph expressly taken
from the original.
SCHUBERT.
359
3. The bust on the tomb, which gives a very
prosaic version of his features.
His exterior by no means answered to his
genius. His general appearance was insigni
ficant. As we have already said, he was prob
ably not more than 5 feet and I inch high,
his figure was stout and clumsy, with a round
back and shoulders (perhaps due to incessant
1 Reviewed by Mr. E. Prout in 'Concordia' for 1875, pp.8, 29, 109, etc.
2 He bought it in Feb. 1881 for 1,205 florins, or about 120Z. It is
about 8 inches high, by 6 -wide.
writing), fleshy arms, and thick short fingers.
His complexion was pasty, nay even tallowy ;
his cheeks were full, his eyebrows bushy, and his
nose insignificant. But there were two things that
to a great extent redeemed these insignificant
traits — his hair, which was black, and remark
ably thick and 3 vigorous, as if rooted in the
brain within ; and his eyes, which were truly
' the windows of his soul,' and even through the
spectacles he constantly wore were so bright as
at once to attract attention.4 If Rieder's por
trait may be trusted — and it is said to be very
faithful, though perhaps a little too fine — they
had a peculiarly steadfast penetrating look, which
irresistibly reminds one of the firm rhythm of
his music. His glasses are inseparable from his
face. One of our earliest glimpses of him is
' a little boy in spectacles' at the Convict ; he ha
bitually slept in them ; and within 1 8 months of
his death we see him standing in the window at
Dobling, his glasses pushed up over his fore
head, and Grillparzer's verses held close to his
searching eyes. He had the broad strong jaw of
all great men, and a marked assertive prominence
of the lips. When at rest the expression of his
face was uninteresting, but it brightened up at
the mention of music, especially that of Bee
thoven. His voice was something between a soft
tenor and a baritone. He sang ' like a composer,'
without the least affectation or attempt.5
His general disposition was in accordance with
his countenance. His sensibility, though his
music shows it was extreme, was not roused by
the small things of life. He had little of that
jealous susceptibility which too often distinguishes
musicians, more irritable even than the ' irritable
race of poets.' His attitude towards Rossini
and Weber proves this. When a post which
he much coveted was given to 6 another, he
expressed his satisfaction at its being bestowed
on so competent a man. Transparent truth
fulness, good-humour, a cheerful contented
evenness, fondness for a joke, and a desire to
remain in the background— such were his pro
minent characteristics in ordinary life. But we
have seen how this apparently impassive man
could be moved by a poem which appealed to
him, or by such music as Beethoven's Cjf minor
Quartet.7 This unfailing good-nature, this sweet
loveableness, doubtless enhanced by his reserve,
was what attached Schubert to his friends.
They admired him ; but they loved him still
more. Ferdinand perfectly adored him, and
even the derisive Ignaz melts when he takes
leave.8 Hardly a letter from Schwind, Schober,
or Bauernfeld, that does not amply testify to
this. Their only complaint is that he will not
return their passion, that ' the affection of years
is not enough to overcome his distrust and fear
of seeing himself appreciated and beloved.' 9 Even
3 All three portraits agree in this. An eminent surgeon of our own
day is accustomed to say, 'Never trust a man -with a great head u(
black hair, he is sure to be an enthusiast.'
* \V. v. Chezy, ' Erinnerungen '— ' with eyes so brilliant as at the
first glance to betray the fire within.'
5 Bauernfeld. 8 Weigl. r See pages 324, 353.
a K.H. 149 (i. 151). 9 Schwind, in K.H. 345 (ii. 28).
360
SCHUBERT.
strangers who met him in this entourage were as
much captivated as his friends. J. A. Berg of
Stockholm, who was in Vienna in 1827, as a young
man of 24, and met him at the Bogners, speaks
of him1 with the clinging affection which such
personal charm inspires.
He was a born bourgeois, never really at his
ease except among his equals and chosen asso
ciates. When with them he was genial and
compliant. At the dances of his friends he
would extemporise the most lovely waltzes for
hours together, or accompany song after song.
He was even boisterous — playing the Erl King
on a comb, fencing, howling, and making many
practical jokes. But in good society he was shy
and silent, his face grave ; a word of praise dis
tressed him, he would repel the admiration when
it came, and escape into the next room, or out of
the house, at the first possible moment. In con
sequence he was overlooked, and of his important
friends few knew, or showed that they knew,
what a treasure they had within their reach.
A great player like Bocklet, after performing
the Bb Trio, could kneel to kiss the composer's
hand in rapture, and with broken voice stammer
forth his homage, but there is no trace of such
tribute from the upper classes. What a contrast
to Beethoven's position among his aristocratic
friends — their devotion and patience, his con
temptuous behaviour, the amount of pressing
necessary to make him play, his scorn of emotion,
and love of applause after he had finished ! [See
vol. i. p. 1686.] The same contrast is visible in
the dedications of the music of the two — Bee
thoven's chiefly to crowned heads and nobility,
Schubert's in large proportion to his friends. It
is also evident in the music itself, as we shall
endeavour presently to bring out.
He played, as he sang, ' like a composer,' that
is, with less of technique than of knowledge and
expression. Of the virtuoso he had absolutely
nothing. He improvised in the intervals of throw
ing on his clothes, or at other times when the
music within was too strong to be resisted, but as
an exhibition or performance never, and there is
no record of his playing any music but his own.
He occasionally accompanied his songs at con
certs (always keeping Very strict time), but we
never hear of his having extemporised or played
a piece in public in Vienna. Notwithstanding
the shortness of his fingers, which sometimes got
tired,2 he could play most of his own pieces, and
with such force and beauty as to compel a
musician3 who was listening to one of his latest
Sonatas to exclaim, ' I admire your playing more
than your music,' an exclamation susceptible
of two interpretations, of which Schubert is said
to have taken the unfavourable one. But ac
companiment was his forte, and of this we
have already spoken [see pp. 342 b, 347 a etc.].
Duet-playing was a favourite recreation with him.
Schober, Gahy, and others, were his companions
in this, and Gahy has left on record his admira-
In a letter to the writer. 2 Bauernfeld.
3 Horzalka. K. H. 128 (i. 132).
SCHUBERT.
tion of the clean rapid playing, the bold concep
tion and perfect grasp of expression, and the
clever droll remarks that would drop from him
during the piece.
His life as a rule was regular, even mono
tonous. He composed or studied habitually for
six or seven hours every morning. This was
one of the methodical habits which he had
learned from his good old father ; others were
the old-fashioned punctilious style of addressing
strangers, which struck Hiller1 with such conster
nation, and the dating of his music. He was
re.idy to write directly he tumbled out of bed,
and remained steadily at work till two. ' When
I have done one piece I begin the next ' was his
explanation to a visitor in 1827 ; and one of these
mornings produced six of the songs in the ' Win-
terreise ' ! At two he dined — when there was
money enough for dinner — either at the Gast-
haus, where in those days it cost a ' Zwanziger '
(8|rf.), or with a friend or patron; and the
afternoon was spent in making music, as at
Mad. Lacsny Buchwieser's [p. 347 a], or in
walking in the environs of Vienna. If the
weather was fine the walk was often prolonged
till late, regardless of engagements in town ; but
if this was not the case, he was at the coffee-house
by five, smoking his pipe and ready to joke with
any of his set ; then came an hour's music, as at
Sofie Miiller's [p. 341 b~\ ; then the theatre, and
supper at the Gasthaus again, and the coffee
house, Lometimes till far into the morning. In
those days no Viennese, certainly no young
bachelor, dined at home ; so that the repeated
visits to the Gasthaus need not shock the sensi
bilities of any English lover of Schubert. [See
P« 345-] Nor let any one be led away with the no tion
that he was a sot, as some seem prone to believe.
How could a sot — how could any one who even
lived freely, and woke with a heavy head or a
disordered stomach — have worked as he worked,
and have composed nearly 1000 such works as
his in 1 8 years, or have performed the feats of
rapidity that Schubert did in the way of opera,
symphony, quartet, song, which we have enu
merated ? No sot could write six of the ' Win-
terreise' songs — perfect, enduring works of art —
in one morning, and that no singular feat!
Your Morlands and Poes are obliged to wait
their time, and produce a few works as their
brain and their digestion will allow them, in
stead of being always ready for their greatest
efforts, as Mozart and Schubert were. Schubert
— like Mozart— rloved society and its accompani
ments ; he would have been no Viennese if he
had not ; and he may have been occasionally led
away; but such escapades were rare. He does
not appear to have cared for the other sex, or
to have been attractive to them as Beethoven
was, notwithstanding his ugliness. This sim
plicity curiously characterises his whole life ; no
feats of memory are recorded of him as they so
* ' Kunstlerleben,' p. 49. • Schubert I find mentioned in my journal
as a quiet man — possibly not always so, though it was only amongst
his Intimates that he broke out. When I visited him in his modest
lodcing he received me kyndly, but so respec'.fully as quite to frighten
me.1
SCHUBERT.
often are of other great musicians ; the records
of his life contain nothing to quote. His letters,
some forty in all, are evidently forced from him.
' Heavens and Earth,' says he, ' it 's frightful hav
ing 'to describe one's travels ; I cannot write any
more.' ' Dearest friend ' — on another occasion —
4 you will be astonished at my writing : I am so
myself.'1 Strange contrast to the many in
teresting epistles of Mozart and Mendelssohn,
and the numberless notes of Beethoven ! Bee
thoven was well read, a politician, thought
much, and talked eagerly on many subjects.
Mozart and Mendelssohn both drew ; travelling
was a part of their lives ; they were men of the
world, and Mendelssohn was master of many
accomplishments. Schumann too, though a Saxon
of Saxons, had travelled much, and while a most
prolific composer, was a practised literary man.
But Schubert has nothing of the kind to show. He
not only never travelled out of Austria, but he
never proposed it, and it is difficult to conceive of
his doing so. To picture or work of art he very
rarely refers. He expressed himself with such
difficulty that it was all but impossible to argue
with him.2 Besides the letters just mentioned,
a few pages of diary and four or five poems are
all that he produced except his music. In liter
ature his range was wide indeed, but it all went
into his music ,• and he was strangely uncritical.
He seems to have been hardly able — at any
rate he did not care — to discriminate between
the magnificent songs of Goethe, Schiller, and
Mayrhofer, the feeble domesticities of Kosegar-
ten and Holty, and the turgid couplets of the
authors of his librettos. All came alike to his
omnivorous appetite. But the fact is that,
apart from his music, Schubert's life was little or
nothing, and that is its most peculiar and most
interesting fact. Music and music alone was to
him all in all. It was not his principal mode of
expression, it was his only one ; it swallowed up
every other. His afternoon walks, his evening
amusements, were all so many preparations for
the creations of the following morning. No doubt
he enjoyed the country, but the effect of the
walk is to be found in his music and his music
only. He left, as we have said, no letters to
speak of, no journal ; there is no record of his
ever having poured out his soul in confidence, as
Beethoven did in the ' Will,' in the three mys
terious letters to some unknown Beloved, or in
his conversations with Bettina. He made no
impression even on his closest friends beyond
that of natural kindness, goodness, truth, and
reserve. His life is all summed up in his music.
No memoir of Schubert can ever be satisfactory,
because no relation can be established between
his life and his music ; or rather, properly speak
ing, because there is no life to establish a
relation with. The one scale of the balance
is absolutely empty, the other is full to over
flowing.
For when we come to the music we find
everything that was wanting elsewhere. There
SCHUBERT.
361
1 K.H. 368 (ii. 55) ; 417 (ii. 104).
* Serried, in Schilling's Lexicc
we have fluency, depth acuteness and variety
of expression, unbounded imagination, the hap
piest thoughts, never-tiring energy, and a sym
pathetic tenderness beyond belief. And these
were the result of natural gifts and of the
incessant practice to which they forced him. ; for
it seems certain that of education in music —
meaning by education the severe course of train
ing in the mechanical portions of their art to
which Mozart and Mendelssohn were subjected
— he had little or nothing. As we have already
mentioned, the two musicians who professed to
instruct him, Holzer and Ruczicka, were so
astonished at his ability that they contented
themselves with wondering, and allowing him
to go his own way. And they are responsible
for that want of counterpoint which was an
embarrassment to him all his life, and drove
him, during his last illness, to seek lessons.
[See p. 353]. What he learned, he learned
mostly for himself, from playing in the Convict
orchestra, from incessant writing, and from
reading the best scores he could obtain ; and,
to use the expressive term of his friend Mayr
hofer, remained a ' Naturalist ' to the end of his
life. From the operas of the Italian masters,
which were recommended to him by Salieri, he
advanced to those of Mozart, and of Mozart
abundant traces appear in his earlier instru
mental works. In 1814 Beethoven was prob
ably still tabooed in the Convict ; and beyond
the Prometheus music, and the first two Sym
phonies, a pupil there would not be likely to
encounter anything of his.
To speak first of the orchestral works.
The ist Symphony dates from 1814 (his 1 8th
year), and between that and 1818 we have five
more. These are all much tinctured by what he
was hearing and reading — Haydn, Mozart, Ros
sini, Beethoven (the last but slightly, for reasons
just hinted at). Now and then — as in the second
subjects of the first and last Allegros of Sym
phony i, the first subject of the opening Allegro
of Symphony 2, and the Andante of Symphony 5,
the themes are virtually reproduced — no doubt
unconsciously. The treatment is more his
own, especially in regard to the use of the wind
instruments, and to the ' working out ' of the
movements, where his want of education drives
him to the repetition of the subject in various
keys, and similar artifices, in place of contrapuntal
treatment. In the slow movement and Finale
of the Tragic Symphony, No. 4, we have exceed
ingly happy examples, in which, without abso
lutely breaking away from the old world, Schu
bert has revealed an amount of original feeling
and an extraordinary beauty of treatment which
already stamp him as a great orchestral com
poser. But whether always original or not in
their subjects, no one can listen to these first six
Symphonies without being impressed with their
individuality. Single phrases may remind us of
other composers, the treatment may often be
traditional, but there is a fluency and continuity,
a happy cheerfulness, an earnestness and want of
triviality, and an absence of labour, which proclaim
362
SCHUBERT.
a new composer. The writer is evidently writ
ing because what he has to say must come out,
even though he may occasionally couch it in the
phrases of his predecessors. Beauty and pro
fusion of melody reign throughout. The tone is
often plaintive but never obscure, and there is
always the irrepressible gaiety of youth and of
Schubert's own Viennese nature, ready and will
ing to burst forth. His treatment of particular
instruments, especially the wind, is already quite
his own — a happy conversational way which at a
later period becomes highly characteristic. At
length, in the B minor Symphony (Oct. 30, 1822),
we meet with something which never existed
in the world before in orchestral music — a new
class of thoughts and a new mode of expression
which distinguish him entirely from his prede
cessors, characteristics which are fully maintained
in the Rotamunde music (Christmas 1823), and
culminate in the great C major Symphony (March
1828).
The same general remarks apply to the other
instrumental compositions — the quartets and
PF. sonatas. These often show a close adherence
to the style of the old school, but are always
effective and individual, and occasionally, like
the symphonies, varied by original and charming
movements, as the Trio in the Eb Quartet, or the
Minuet and Trio in the E major one (op. 125,
I and 2), the Sonata in A minor (1817) etc.
The visit to Zele'sz in 1824, with its Hungarian
experiences, and the pianoforte proclivities of the
Esterhazys, seems to have given him a new im
petus in the direction of chamber music. It was
the immediate or proximate cause of the 'Grand
Duo' — that splendid work in which, with Bee
thoven in his eye, Schubert was never more him
self— and the Divertissement a la hongroise ; as
well as the beautiful and intensely personal String
Quartet in A minor, which has been not wrongly
said to be the most characteristic work of any
composer; ultimately also of the D minor and G
major Quartets, the String Quintet in C, and the
three last Sonatas, in all of which the Hungarian
element is strongly perceptible — all the more
strongly because we do not detect it at all in the
songs and vocal works.
Here then, at 1822 in the orchestral works, and
1824 in the chamber music, we may perhaps draw
the line between Schubert's mature and imma
ture compositions. The stfep from the Symphony
in C of 1818 to the Unfinished Symphony in
B minor, or to the Rosamunde Entracte in the
same key, is quite as great as Beethoven's was
from No. 2 to the Eroica, or Mendelssohn's from
the C minor to the Italian Symphony. All trace
of his predecessors is gone, and he stands alone in
his own undisguised and pervading personality.
All trace of his youth has gone too. Life has
become serious, nay cruel; and a deep earnest
ness and pathos animate all his utterances. Simi
larly in the chamber-music, the Octet stands on
the line, and all the works which have made
their position and are acknowledged as great are
on this side of it— the Grand Duo, the Diver
tissement Hongroise, the PF. Sonatas in A minor,
SCHUBERT.
D, and Bb, the Fantasie-Sonata in G ; the Im
promptus and Momens musicals ; the String
Quartets in A minor, D minor, and G ; the String-
Quintet in C; the Rondo brillant, — in short, all
the works which the world thinks of when it
mentions 'Schubert' (we are speaking now of
instrumental music only) are on this side of 1822.
On the other side of the line, in both cases, or
chestra and chamber, are a vast number of works
full of beauty, interest, and life ; breathing youth
in every bar, absolute Schubert in many move
ments or passages, but not completely saturated
with him, not of sufficiently independent power
to assert their rank with the others, or to com
pensate for the diffuseness and repetition which
remained characteristics of their author to the
last, but which in the later works are hidden
or atoned for by the astonishing force, beauty,
romance, and personality inherent in the contents
of the music. These early works will always be
more than interesting; and no lover of Schubert
but must regard them with the strong affection
and fascination which his followers feel for every
bar he wrote. But the judgment of the world at
large will probably always remain what it now is.
He was, as Liszt so finely l said, ' le musicicn
le plus po&te quejamais' — the most poetical mu
sician that ever was ; and the main character
istics of his music will always be its vivid per
sonality, fullness, and poetry. In the case of
other great composers, the mechanical skill and
ingenuity, the very ease and absence of effort
with which many of their effects are produced,
or their pieces constructed, is a great element in
the pleasure produced by their music. Not so
with Schubert. In listening to him one is never
betrayed into exclaiming ' how clever ! ' but very
often ' how poetical, how beautiful, how intensely
Schubert ! ' The impression produced by his great
works is that the means are nothing and the
effect everything. Not that he had no technical
skill. Counterpoint he was deficient in, but the
power of writing whatever he wanted he had
absolutely at his fingers' end. No one had ever
written more, and the notation of his ideas must
have been done without an effort. In the words
of Mr. Macfarren,2 ' the committing his works to
paper was a process that accompanied their com
position like the writing of an ordinary letter
that is indited at the very paper.' In fact we
know, if we had not the manuscripts to prove it,
that he wrote with the greatest ea^e and rapidity,
and could keep up a conversation, not only while
writing down but while inventing his best works ;
that he never hesitated ; very rarely revised— it
would often have been better if he had ; and
never seems to have aimed at making innovations
or doing things for effect. For instance, in the
number and arrangement of the movements, his
symphonies and sonatas never depait from the
regular Haydn pattern. They show no aesthetic
artifices, such as quoting the theme of one move
ment in another movement, or running them into
each other ; changing their order, or introducing
1 Liszt's worst enemies will pardon him much for this sentence.
2 Philharmonic programme, May 22, U71.
SCHUBERT.
extra ones; mixing various times simultaneously
— or similar mechanical means of producing unity
or making novel effects, which often surprise and
please us in Beethoven, Schumann, Mendelssohn
and Spohr. Not an instance of this is to be found
in Schubert. Nor has he ever indicated a pro
gramme, or prefixed a motto to any of his works.
His matter is so abundant and so full of variety
and interest that he never seems to think of en
hancing it by any devices. He did nothing to
extend the formal limits of Symphony or Sonata,
but he endowed them with a magic, a romance,
a sweet naturalness, which no one has yet ap
proached. And as in the general structure so in
the single movements. .A simple canon, as in
the Eb Trio, the Andante of the B minor or the
Scherzo of the C major Symphonies ; an occa
sional round, as in the Masses and Part-songs ; —
such is pretty nearly all the science that he affords.
His vocal fugues are notoriously weak, and the
symphonies rarely show those piquant fugutos
which are so delightful in Beethoven and Men
delssohn. On the other hand, in all that is ne
cessary to express his thoughts and feelings, and
to convey them to the hearer, he is inferior to
none. Such passages as the return to the sub
ject in the Andante of the B minor Symphony,
or in the ballet air in G of Eosamunde ; as the
famous horn passage in the Andante of the C
major Symphony (No. 10) — which Schumann
happily compares to a being from the other world
gliding about the orchestra — or the equally beau
tiful cello solo further on in the same movement,
are unsurpassed in orchestral music for felicity
and beauty, and have an emotional effect which
no learning could give. There is a place in the
working-out of the Rosamunde Entracte in B
minor (change into GjJ), in which the combination
of modulation and scoring produces a weird and
overpowei'ing feeling quite exceptional, and the
change to the major near the end of the same
great work will always astonish. One of the most
prominent beauties in these orchestral works is
the exquisite and entirely fresh manner in which
the wind instruments are combined. Even in
his earliest Symphonies he begins that method of
dialogue by interchange of phrases, which rises at
last to the well-known and lovely passages in the
Overture to Rosamunde (2nd subject), the Trios
of the Bb Entracte, and the Air de Ballet in the
same music, and in the Andantes of the 8th and
loth Symphonies. No one has ever combined wind
instruments as these are combined. To quote
Schumann once more — they talk and intertalk
like human beings. It is no artful concealment
of art. The artist vanishes altogether, and the
loving, simple, human friend remains. It were
well to be dumb in articulate speech with such
a power of utterance at command ! If anything
were wanting to convince us of the absolute in
spiration of such music as this it would be the
fact that Schubert never can have heard either
of the two Symphonies which we have just been
citing. — But to return to the orchestra. The
trombones were favourite instruments with Schu-
bett in his later life. In the fucral movements
SCHUBERT.
363
of his two last Masses he makes them accom
pany the voices in unison, with a persistence
which is sometimes almost unbearable for its
monotony. In portions of the C major Sym
phony also (No. 10) some may possibly find
them too much l used. But in other parts of
the Masses they are beautifully employed, and
in the Introduction and Allegro of the Symphony
they are used with a noble effect, which not
improbably suggested to Schumann the equally
impressive use of them in his Bb Symphony. The
accompaniments to his subjects are always of
great ingenuity and originality, and full of life
and character. The triplets in the Finale to the
loth Symphony, which excited the mal d propos
merriment of the Philharmonic orchestra (see
p. 358) are a very striking instance. Another is
the incessant run of semiquavers in the second
violins and violas which accompany the second
theme in the Finale of the Tragic Symphony.
Another, of which he is very fond, is the em
ployment of a recurring monotonous figure in the
inner parts : —
xte£:
etc.
often running to great length, as in the Andantes
of the Tragic and B minor Symphonies ; the
Moderate of the Bb Sonata ; the fine song ' Viola'
(op. 123, at the return to Ab in the middle of
the song) etc. etc. In his best PF. music, the ac
companiments are most happily fitted to the
leading part, so as never to clash or produce dis
cord. Rapidly as he wrote he did these things as
if they were calculated. But they never obtrude
themselves or become prominent. They are all
merged and absorbed in the gaiety, pathos and
personal interest of the music itself, and of the
man who is uttering through it his griefs and
joys, his hopes and fears, in so direct and touching
a manner as no composer ever did before or since,
and with no thought of an audience, of fame, or
success, or any other external thing. No one
who listens to it can doubt that Schubert wrote
for himself alone. His music is the simple utter.-
ance of the feelings with which his mind is full.
If he had thought of his audience, or the effect
he would produce, or the capabilities of the means
he was employing, he would have taken more
pains in the revision of his works. Indeed the
most affectionate disciple of Schubert must admit
that the want of revision is often but too ap
parent.
In his instrumental music he is often very
diffuse. When a passage pleases him he gene
rally repeats it at once, almost note for note. He
will reiterate a passage over and over in different
keys, as if he could never have done. In the
songs this does not offend ; and even here, if we
1 There is a tradition that he doubted this himse'.f, and referred
the score to Lachner for his opinion.
364
SCHUBERT.
knew what he was thinking of, as we do in the
songs, we might possibly find the repetitions j ust.
In the Eb Trio he repeats in the Finale a charac
teristic accompaniment which is very prominent in
the first movement and which originally belongs
perhaps to the Ab Impromptu (op. 90, no. 4) — and
a dozen other instances of the same kind might
be quoted.1 This arose in great part from his
imperfect education, but in great part also from
the furious pace at which he dashed down his
thoughts and feelings, apparently without pre
vious sketch, note, or preparation ; and from
his habit of never correcting a piece after it was
once on paper. Had he done so he would doubt
less have taken out many a repetition, and some
trivialities which seem terribly out of place amid
the usual nobility and taste of his thoughts.
It was doubtless this diffuseness and apparent
want of aim, as well as the jolly, untutored, naivete
of some of his subjects (Rondo of D major
Sonata, etc.), and the incalculable amount of
modulation, that made Mendelssohn shrink from
some of Schubert's instrumental works, and even
go so far as to call the D minor quartet fchlechte
Musik — i.e. 'nasty music.' But unless to musi
cians whose fastidiousness is somewhat abnormal
— as Mendelssohn's was — such criticisms only
occur afterwards, on reflection ; for during the
progress of the work all is absorbed in the in
tense life and personality of the music. And
what beauties there are to put against these
redundances ! Take such movements as the
first Allegro of the A minor Sonata or the Bb
Sonata; the G major Fantasia-Sonata; the two
Characteristic Marches ; the Impromptus and
Momens musicals ; the Minuet of the A minor
Quartet ; the Variations of the D minor Quartet ;
the Finale of the Bb Trio; the first two move
ments, or the Trio, of the String Quintet ; the two
movements of the B minor Symphony, or the won
derful Entracte in the same key in Rosamunde ;
the Finale of the loth Symphony — think of the
abundance of the thoughts, the sudden surprises,
the wonderful transitions, the extraordinary pathos
of the turns of melody and modulation, the abso
lute manner (to repeat once more) in which they
bring you into contact with the affectionate,
tender, suffering personality of the composer, —
and who in the whole realm of music has ever
approached them ? For the magical expression
of such a piece as the Andantino in Ab (op. 94,
no. 2), any redundance may be pardoned.
In Schumann's 2 words, ' he has strains for the
most subtle thoughts and feelings, nay even for the
events and conditions of life; and innumerable as
are the shades of human thought and action, so va
rious is his music.' Another equally true saying
of Schumann's is that, compared with Beethoven,
Schubert is as a woman to a man. For it must
be confessed that one's attitude towards him is
almost always that of sympathy, attraction, and
love, rarely that of embarrassment or fear. Here
and there only, as in the Rosamunde B minor
Entracte, or the Finale of the loth Symphony,
' For a comparison of his Sonatas with those of other masters see
2 Ges. Schriften, i. 206.
SCHUBERT.
does he compel his hearers with an irresistible
power ; and yet how different is this compulsion
from the strong, fierce, merciless coercion, with
which Beethoven forces you along, and bows and
bends you to his will, in the Finale of the 8th or
still more that of the 7th Symphony.
We have mentioned the gradual manner in
( which Schubert reached his own style in instru
mental music (see p. 361). In this, except per
haps as to quantity, the?-e is nothing singular, or
radically different from the early career of other
composers. Beethoven began on the lines 01
Mozart, and Mendelssohn on those of Weber,
and gradually found their own independent style.
But the thing in which Schubert stands alone
is that while he was thus arriving by degrees
at individuality in Sonatas, Quartets, and Sym
phonies, he was pouring forth songs by the dozen,
many of which were of the greatest possible
novelty, originality, and mastery, while all of
them have that peculiar cachet which is imme
diately recognisable as his. The chronological
list of his works given at the end of this article
shows that such masterpieces as the G-ret-
chen am Spinnrade, the Erl King, the Ossian
Songs, Gretchen im Dom, Der Taucher, Die
Biirgschaft, were written before he was 19, and
were contemporary with his very early efforts in
the orchestra and chamber music ; and that by
1822 — in the October of which he wrote the two
movements of his 8th Symphony, which we have
named as his first absolutely original instru
mental music — he had produced in addition such
ballads as Ritter Toggenburg (1816), and Ein-
samkeifc (1818) ; such classical songs as Memnon
(1817), Antigone und (Edip (1817), Iphigenia
(1817), Ganymed (1817), Fahrt zum Hades
(1817), Prometheus (1819), Gruppe aus dem
Tartarus (1817); Goethe's Wilhelm Meister
songs, An Schwager Kronos (1816), Grenzen der
Menschheit (1821), Suleika's two songs (1821),
Geheimes (1821),- as well as the 'Wanderer'
(1816), 'Sei mir gegriisst' (1821), Waldesnacht
(1820), Greisengesang (1822), and many more of
his very greatest and most immortal songs.
And this is very confirmatory of the view
already taken in this article (p. 328) of Schubert's
relation to music. The reservoir of music was
within him from his earliest years, and songs
being so much more direct a channel than the
more complicated and artificial courses and
conditions of the symphony or the sonata, music
came to the surface in them so much the more
quickly. Had the orchestra or the piano been as
direct a mode of utterance as the voice, and the
forms of symphony or sonata as simple as that
•of the song, there seems no reason why he should
not have written instrumental music as charac
teristic as his 8th Symphony, his Sonata in A
minor, and his Quartet in the same key, eight years
•earlier than he did ; for the songs of that early
date prove that he had then all the original
power, imagination, and feeling, that he ever
had. That it should have been given to a com
parative boy to produce strains which seem to
breathe the emotion and experience of a long
. -
SCHUBERT.
life is only part of the wonder which will also
surround Schubert's songs. After 1822, when
his youth was gone, and health had begun to
fail, and life had become a terrible reality, his
thoughts turned inwards, and he wrote the
two great cycles of the ' Mullerlieder ' (1823)
and the 'Winterreise' (1837) ; the Walter Scott
and Shakspeare songs ; the splendid single songs
of • Im Walde ' and ' Auf der Briicke,' ' Tod-
tengrabers Heimweh,' 'Der Zwerg,' 'Die junge
Nonne '; the Barcarolle, ' Du bist die Ruh,' and
the lovely ' Dass sie hier gewesen '; the ' Schiffers
Scheidelied,' those which were collected into the
so-called 'Schwanengesang,' and many more.
It is very difficult to draw a comparison be
tween the songs of this later period and those of
the earlier one, but the difference must strike
every one, and it resides mainly perhaps in the
subjects themselves. Subjects of romance — of
ancient times and remote scenes, and strange
adventures, and desperate emotion — are natural
to the imagination of youth. But in maturer
life the mind is calmer, and dwells more
strongly on personal subjects. And this is the
case with Schubert. After 1822 the classical
songs and ballads are rare, and the themes which
he chooses belong chiefly to modern life and
individual feeling, such as the ' Miillerlieder '
and the ' Winterreise,' and others in the list just
given. Walter Scott's and Shakspeare's form an
exception, but it is an exception which explains
itself. We no longer have the exuberant dra
matic force of the Erl King, Ganymed, the
Gruppe aus dem Tartarus, Cronnan, or Kolmaa
Klage ; but we have instead the condensation
and personal point of 'Pause,' 'Die Post,' 'Das
Wirthshaus,' ' Die Nebensonnen,' the 'Doppel-
ganger,' and the 'Junge Nonne.' And there is
more maturity in the treatment. His modu
lations are fewer. His accompaniments are
always interesting and suggestive, but they gain
in force and variety and quality of ideas in the
later songs.
In considering the songs themselves somewhat
more closely, their most obvious characteristics
are: — Their number; their length; the variety
of the words ; their expression, and their other
musical and poetical peculiarities.
1. Their number. The published songs, that
is to say the compositions for one and two voices,
including Offertories and songs in operas, amount
to just 455. In addition there are, say, 150 un
published songs, a few of them unfinished. The
chronological list at the end of this article shows
that a very large number of these were written
before the year 1818.
2. Their length. This varies very much. The
shortest, like ' Klage um Aly Bey'' (Lf. xlv. 3),
'Der Goldschmiedsgesell ' (Lf. xlviii. 6), and ' Die
Spinnerin' (op. 118, 6), are strophe songs (that
is, with the same melody and harmony unchanged
verse after verse), in each of which the voice
part is only 8 bars long, with a bar or two of
introduction or ritornel. The longest is Ber-
trand's ' Adelwold und Emma,' (MS., June 5,
1815)', a ballad the autograph of which contains
SCHUBERT.
365
55 pages. Others of almost equal length and
of about the same date are also still in MS —
' Minona,' ' Die Nonne,' ' Amphiaraos,' etc. The
longest printed one is Schiller's 'Der Taucher '-
the diver. This fills 36 pages of close print.
Schiller's ' Biirgschaft ' and the Ossian-songs are
all long, though not of the same extent as
'Der Taucher.' These vast ballads are extremely
dramatic ; they contain many changes of tempo
and of signature, dialogues, recitatives, and airs.
The ' Ritter Toggenburg' ends with a strophe-song
in five stanzas. ' Der Taucher ' contains a long
pianoforte passage of 60 bars, during the sus
pense after the diver's last descent. ' Der Liedler*
contains a march. The Ballads mostly belong to
the early years, 1815, 1 8 16. The last is Mayr-
hofer's ' Einsamkeit,' the date of which Schubert
has fixed in his letter of Aug. 3, 1818. There are
long songs of later years, such as Collin's ' Der
Zwerg' of 1823; Schober's 'Viola' and 'Vergiss-
meinnicht ' of 1823, and 'Schiffers Scheidelied'
of 1827, and Leitner's 'Der Winterabend' of
1828 ; but these are essentially different to the
ballads ; they are lyrical, and evince comparatively
few mechanical changes.
It stands to reason that in 650 songs collected
from all the great German poets, from Klopstock
to Heine, there must be an infinite variety of
material, form, sentiment, and expression. And
one of the most obvious characteristics in
Schubert's setting of this immense collection is
the close way in which he adheres to the words.1
Setting a song was no casual operation with him,
rapidly as it was often done ; but he iden
tified himself with the poem, and the poet's mood
for the time was his. Indeed he complains of the
influence which the gloom of the ' Winterreise '
had had upon his spirits. He does not, as is
the manner of some song-composers, set the poet
at naught by repeating his words over and over
again. This he rarely does ; but he goes through
his poem and confines himself to enforcing the
expression as music alone can do to poetry. The
music changes with the words as a landscape does
when sun and cloud pass over it. And in this
Schubert has anticipated Wagner, since the words
to which he writes are as much the absolute basis
of his songs, as Wagner's librettos are of his operas.
What this has brought him to in such cases as
the Erl King, the Wanderer, Schwager Kronos,
the Gruppe aus dem Tartarus, the Shakspeare
songs of 'Sylvia' and 'Hark, hark, the lark!'
those of Ellen and the Huntsman in ' The Lady
of the Lake' even Englishmen can judge; but
what he did in the German literature generally
may be gathered from the striking passage already
quoted fromVogl (p. 3276), and from Mayrhofer's
confession — doubly remarkable when coming from
a man of such strong individuality — who some
where says that he did not understand the full
force even of his own poems until he had heard
Schubert's setting of them.
1 It is strange to find his practice in the Masses so different. There—
a critic has pointed out— in every one of the six. words are either
omitted or incorrectly jumbled together (Mr. Frout, in Coiicordia.
1K75, p. 110 a). Was this because he understood the Latin words im
perfectly ?
366
SCHUBERT.
One of his great means of expression is modu
lation. What magic this alone can work may be
seen in the Trio of the Sonata in D. As in his
PF. works, so in the songs, he sometimes carries it
to an exaggerated degree. Thus in the short song
'Liedesend ' of Mayrhofer (Sept. 1816), he begins
in C minor, and then goes quickly through Eb in
to Cb major. The signature then changes and we
are at once in D major ; then C major. Then the
signature again changes to that of Ab, in which
we remain for 15 bars. From Ab it is an easy
transition to F minor, but a very sudden one
from that again to A minor. Then for the
breaking of the harp we are forced into D?, and
immediately, with a further change of signature,
into Fff. Then for the King's song, with a fifth
change of signature, into B major ; and lastly, for
the concluding words,
Und immer naher schreitet
Verganglichkeit und Grab —
And always nearer hasten
Oblivion and the tomb—
a sixth change, with 8 bars in E minor, thus
ending the song a third higher than it began.
In Schiller's 'Der Pilgrim' (1825), after two
strophes (four stanzas) of a chorale-like melody
in D major, we come, with the description of
the difficulties of the pilgrim's road — mountain*,
torrents, ravines — to a change into D minor, fol
lowed by much extraneous modulation, reaching
Ab minor, and ending in F, in which key the
first melody is repeated. At the words ' naher
bin ich nicht zum Ziel' — ' still no nearer to my
goal' — we have a similar phrase and similar har
mony (though in a different key) to the well-known
complaint in 'The Wanderer,' 'Und immer fragt
der Seufzer, Wo?' — 'Sighing I utter where? oh
where?' The signature then changes, and the
song ends very impressively in B minor.
These two are quoted, the first as an instance
rather of exaggeration, the second of the me
chanical use of modulations to convey the natural
difficulties depicted in the poem. But if we
want examples of the extraordinary power with
which Schubert wields this great engine of emo
tion, we would mention another song which
contains one of the best instances to be found
of propriety of modulation. I allude to Schu-
bart's short poem to Death, 'An den Tod,' where
the gloomy subject and images of the poet have
tempted the composer to a series of successive
changes so grand, so sudden, and yet so easy,
and so thoroughly in keeping with the subject,
that it is impossible to hear them unmoved.
But modulation, though an all-pervading means
of expression in Schubert's hands, is only one
out of many. Scarcely inferior to the wealth of
his modulation is the wealth of his melodies.
The beauty of these is not more astonishing
than their variety and their fitness to the
words. Such tunes as those of Ave Maria, or the
Serenade in the Schwanengesang, or Ungeduld,
or the Griinen Lautenband, or Anna Lyle, or the
Dithyrambe, or Geheimes, or Sylvia, or the Lin-
denbaum, or Du bist die Ruh, or the Barcarolle,
are not more lovely and more appropriate to the
SCHUBERT.
text than they are entirely different from one
another. One quality only, spontaneity, they
have in common. With Beethoven, spontaneity
was the result of labour, and the more he polished
the more natural were his tunes. But Schubert
read the poem, and the appropriate tune, married
to immortal verse (a marriage, in his case, truly
made in heaven), rushed into his mind, and to
the end of his pen. It must be confessed that
he did not always think of the compass of his
voices. In his latest songs, as in his earliest
(see p. 321 a), we find him taking the singer
from the low Bb to F, and even higher.
The tune, however, in a Schubert song is by
no means an exclusive feature. The accompani
ments are as varied and as different as the voice-
parts, and as important for the general effect.
They are often extremely elaborate, and the pub
lishers' letters contain many complaints of their
difficulty.1 They are often most extraordinarily
suitable to the words, as in the Erl King, or the
beautiful *Dass sie hier gewesen,' the 'Gruppe
ausdem Tartarus,' the' Waldesnacht' (and many
others) ; where it is almost impossible to imagine
any atmosphere more exactly suitable to make
the words grow in one's mind, than is supplied
by the accompaniment. Their unerring certainty
is astonishing. Often, as in Heliopolis, or Auf-
losung, he seizes at once on a characteristic im
petuous figure, which is then carried on without
intermission to the end. In ' Anna Lyle,' how
exactly does the sweet monotony of the repeated
figure fall in with the dreamy sadness of Scott's
touching little lament! Another very charming
example of the same thino1, though in a different
o
direction, is found in 'Der Einsame, a fireside
piece, where the frequently recurring group of
four semiquavers imparts an indescribable air of
domesticity to the picture.2 In the ' Winterabend'
— the picture of a calm moonlit evening— the
accompaniment, aided by a somewhat similar little
figure, conveys inimitably the very breath of the
scene. Such atmospheric effects as these are very
characteristic of Schubert.
The voice-part and the accompaniment some
times form so perfect a whole, that it is im
possible to disentangle the two; as in 'Sylvia,'
where the persistent dotted quaver in the bass,
and the rare but delicious ritornel of two notes
in the treble of the piano-part (bars 7, 14, etc.),
are essential to the grace and sweetness of the
portrait, and help to place the lovely English
figure before us. This is the case also in ' Anna
Lyle ' just mentioned, where the ritornel in the
piano-part (bar 20, etc.) is inexpressibly soothing
and tender in its effect, and sounds like the echo
of the girl's sorrow. The beautiful Serenade in
the Schwanengesang, again, combines an incessant
rhythmical accompaniment with ritornels (longer
than those in the last case), both uniting with the
lovely melody in a song of surpassing beauty. In
the ' Liebesbothschaft,' the rhythm is not so
3 Op. 57, containing three songs by no means difficult, was pub
lished with a notice on the title-page that care had been taken (we
trust with Schubert's consent) to omit everything that was too hard.
2 A similar mood is evoked in the Andante of the Grand Inio
(op. 140).
SCHUBERT.
strongly marked, but the ritornels are longer and
more frequent, and form a charming feature in
that exquisite love-poem. Schubert's passion for
rhythm comes out as strongly in many of the songs
as it does in his marches and scherzos. In the
two just named, though persistent throughout,
the rhythm is subordinated to the general effect.
But in others, as ' Suleika,' ' Die Sterne/ the
' Nachtgesang im Walde,' ' Erstarrung,' or ' Friih-
lingssehnsucht,' it forces itself more on the
attention.
Schubert's basses are always splendid, and are
so used as not only to be the basis of the harmony
but to add essentially to the variety and effect of
the songs. Sometimes, as in ' Die Krahe,' they
are in unison with the voice-part. Often they
share with the voice-part itself in the melody
and structure of the whole. The wealth of ideas
which they display is often astonishing. Thus
in ' Waldesnacht,' a very long song of 1820, to a
fine imaginative poem by F. Schlegel, describing
the impressions produced by a night in the forest,
we have a splendid example of the organic life
which Schubert can infuse into a song. The pace
is rapid throughout ; the accompaniment for the
right hand is in arpeggios of semiquavers through
out, never once leaving off; the left hand, where
not in semiquavers also, has a succession of noble
and varied rhythmical melodies, independent of
the voice, and the whole is so blended with the
voice part — itself extraordinarily broad and digni
fied throughout ; the spirit and variety, and the
poetry of the whole are so remarkable, and the
mystery of the situation is so perfectly conveyed,
as to make the song one of the finest of that
class in ' the whole Schubert collection. The
same qualities will be found in Auf der Bru'cke
(1825).
We do not say that this is the highest class of
his songs. The highest class of poetry, and of
music illustrating anjd enforcing poetry, must
always deal with human joys and sorrows, in
their most individual form, with the soul loving
or longing, in contact with another soul, or with
its Maker; and the greatest of Schubert's songs
will lie amongst those which are occupied with
those topics, such as ' Gretchen am Spinnrade,'
the Mignon songs, the 'Wanderer,' the ' Muller-
lieder,' and ' Winterreise, ' and perhaps highest
of all, owing to the strong religious element
which it contains, the 'Junge Nonne/1 In that
wonderful song, which fortunately is so well
known that no attempt at describing it is ne
cessary, the personal feelings and the surround
ings are so blended — the fear, the faith, the
rapture, the storm, the swaying of the house, are
so given, that for the time the hearer becomes
the Young Nun herself. Even the convent bell,
which in other hands might be a burlesque, is
an instrument of the greatest beauty.
We have spoken of the mental atmosphere
which Schubert throws round his poems ; but he
does not neglect the representation of physical
objects. He seems to confine himself to the
1 Who was Craigher, the author of thi-, splendid song? and would
fie ever have been heard of but for Schubert ?
SCHUBERT.
367
imitation of natural noises, and not to attempt
things which have no sound. The triplets in
the Lindenbaum may be intended to convey the
fluttering leaves of the lime-tree, and the ac
companiment-figure in ' Die Forelle ' may repre
sent the leaps of the Trout ; but there are
other objects about which no mistake can be
made. One imitation of the bell we have just
referred to. Another is in the 'Abendbilder,'
where an Fjf sounds through 1 6 bars to represent
the ' evening bell ' ; in the Ziigenglocklein the
upper E is heard through the whole piece ; and
the bell of St. Mark's is a well-known feature in
the part-song of the ' Gondelfahrer.' The post-
horn forms a natural feature in ' Die Post,' and
the hurdy-gurdy in ' Der Leiermann.' Of birds
he gives several instances ; the Nightingale in
' Ganymed ' and ' Die gefangene Sanger ' ; the
Raven in ' Abendbilder,' and perhaps in ' Friih-
lingstraum ' ; the Cuckoo in ' Einsamkeit,' the
Quail in 'Der Wachtelschlag '; and the Cock in
' Friihlingstrauin.'
That hesitation between major and minor
which is so marked in Beethoven is character
istic also of Schubert, and may be found in nearly
every piece of his. A beautiful instance may be
mentioned en passant in the trio of the G major
Fantasia Sonata (op. 78), where the two bars in E
minor which precede the Emajorhave apeculiarly
charming effect. Another is supplied by the four
bars in A minor, for the question which begins
and ends the beautiful fragment from Schiller's
' Gods of ancient Greece.' He also has an espe
cially happy way — surely peculiarly his own —
of bringing a minor piece to a conclusion in
the major. Two instances of it, which all will
remember, are in the Romance from ' Rosa-
munde ' : —
Du susses Herz, es 1st so schOn, wenn treu die Treu - e kusst.
and in the 'Moment musical,' No. 3, in F minor.
This and the ritornels already spoken of strike
one like personal features or traits of the com
poser. But apart from these idiosyncrasies, the
changes from minor to major in the songs are
often superb. That in the 'Sch wager Kronos'
(astonishing 2 production for a lad under 20),
where the key changes into D major, and farther
on into F major, to welcome the girl on the
threshold, with the sudden return to D minor for
the onward journey, and the sinking sun — can be
forgotten by no one who hears it, nor can that
almost more beautiful change to D major in the
'Gute Nacht' on the mention of the dream.
This latter, and the noble transition to F major
in the ' Junge Nonne ' are too familiar to need
more than a passing reference, or that to G major
in the ' Riickblick,' for the lark and nightingale
and the girl's eyes, or to D major in the Serenade.
' Irdisches Gluck ' is in alternate stanzas of major
and minor. In Schiller's 'Rose' (op. 73) every
shade in the fate of the flower is thus indicated ;
and this is no solitary instance, but in almost
2 Why is this wonderful song never sung m public in England?
368
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBEET.
every song some example of such faithful painting
may be found. A word will often do it. With
Schubert the minor mode seems to be synony
mous with trouble, and the major with relief;
and the mere mention of the sun, or a smile, or
any other emblem of gladness, is sure to make
him modulate. Some such image was floating
before his mind when he made the beautiful
change to A major near the beginning of the
A minor Quartet (bar 23).
The foregoing remarks, which only attempt to
deal with a few of the external characteristics of
these astonishing songs, will be of use if they
only encourage the knowledge and study of them.
The chronological list (No. II) of Schubert's pro
ductions, which is here attempted in this form
for the first time, will, it is hoped, throw much
light on the progress of his genius, by facilitating
the search where alone it can be made with
profit, namely in the works themselves. All are
worth knowing, though all are by no means of
equal excellence.
I end my imperfect sketch of the life and
works of this wonderful musician, by recalling
the fact that Schubert's songs, regarded as a
department of music, are absolutely and entirely
his own. Songs there were before him, those of
Schulz for instance, and of Zumsteeg, which he
so greatly admired, and of Haydn and Mozart —
touching, beautiful expressions of simple thought
and feeling. But the Song, as we know it in his
hands ; full of dramatic fire, poetry, and pathos ;
set to no simple Volkslieder, but to long complex
poems, the best poetry of the greatest poets, and
an absolute reflection of every change and breath
of sentiment in that poetry ; with an accompani
ment of the utmost force, fitness, and variety —
such songs were his and his alone. With one
exception. Beethoven left but one song of im
portance, his 'Liederkreis' (op. 98), but that is
of superlative excellence. The Liederkreis, how
ever, was not published till Dec. 1816, and even
if Schubert made its acquaintance immediately,
yet a reference to the Chronological List will
show that by that time his style was formed, and
many of his finest songs written. He may have
gained the idea of a connected series of songs
from Beethoven, though neither the 'Schone
Miillerin' nor the ' Winterreise ' have the same
intimate internal connexion as the Liederkreis ;
but the character and merits of the single songs
remain his own. When he wrote 'Loda's Ge-
spenst' and ' Kolma's Klage' in 1815, he wrote
what no one had ever attempted before. There
is nothing to detract from his just claim to be
the creator of German Song, as we know it, and
the direct progenitor of those priceless treasures
in which Schumann, Mendelssohn, and Brahms
have followed his example.
Of Schubert's religion it is still more difficult
to say anything than it was of Beethoven's, be
cause he is so much more reticent. A little poem
of Sept. 1820, one of two preserved by Robert
Schumann (Neue Zeitschrift fiir Musik, Feb. 5,
1839) is as vague a confession of faith as can well
be imagined.
THE SPIRIT OF THE WORLD.
Leave them, leave them, to their dream,
I hear the Spirit say :—
It and only it can keep them
Near me on their darkling way.
Leave them racing, hurrying on
To some distant goal,
Building creeds and proofs upon
Half-seen flashes in the soul.
Not a word of it is true.
Yet what loss is theirs or mine ?
In the maze of human systems
I can trace the thought divine.
The other, three years later, May 8, 1 823, is some
what more definite. It calls upon a 'mighty
father ' to look upon his son lying in the dust ;
and implores Him to pour upon him the ever
lasting beams of His love ; and, even though He
kill him, to preserve him for a purer and more
vigorous existence. It expresses — very imper
fectly, it is true, but still unmistakeably — the
same faith that has been put into undying words
by the great poet of our own day: —
Thou wilt not leave us in the dust ;
Thou madest man, he knows not why;
He thinks he was not made to die ;
And Thou hast made him : Thou art just.
Let knowledge grow from more to more,
But more of reverence in us dwell.
That mind and soul, according well,
May make one music as before,
But vaster.1
Franz may not have gone the length of his brother
Ignaz2 in vulgar scoffing at religious forms and per
sons, which no doubt were very empty in Vienna at
that date ; but still of formal or dogmatic religion we
can find no traces, and we must content ourselves
with the practical piety displayed in his love for
his father and Ferdinand, and testified to by them
in their touching words and acts at the time of
his death (p. 354 a) ; and with the certainty that,
though irregular after the irregularity of his time,
Schubert was neither selfish, sensual, nor im
moral. What he was in his inner man we have
the abundant evidence of his music to assure us.
Whatever the music of other composers may do,
no one ever rose from hearing a piece by Schubert
without being benefited by it. Of his good -nature
to those who took the bread out of his mouth we
have already spoken. Of his modesty we may be
allowed to say that he was one of the very few
musicians who ever lived who did not behave as
if he thought himself the greatest man in the
world.3 And these things are all intrinsic parts
of his character and genius.
That he died at an earlier age4 even than
1 In Memoriam (Prologue).
2 See his letter in Kreissle, 147 (1. 149).
3 This modesty comes out in a letter to Ferdinand of July 16— 18,
1824, where Schuhert says, ' it would be better to play some other
quartets than mine ' (probably referring to those in E and Eb), 'since
there is nothing in them except perhaps the fact that they please
you. as everything of mine pleases you. True,' he goes on, 'you do
not appear to have liked them so much as the waltzes at the TJngar-
ische Krone,' alluding to a clock at that eating-house of which
Ferdinand had told him, which was set to play Franz's waltzes. The
clock shows how popular Schubert was amongst his own set, and I
regret having overlooked the fact in its proper place.
* The following are among the musicians, poets, and painters who
have died in the fourth decade of their lives. Shelley, 30; Sir Philip
Sidney, 32; Bellini, 33 ; Mozart, & ; Byron, 36; Ra'aelle. 37; Burns,
37 ; Purcell, 37 ; Mendelssohn, 38 ; Weber, 39; Chopin, 40,
SCHUBERT.
Mozart or Mendelssohn, or our own Purcell, must
be accounted for on the ground partly of his extra
ordinary exertions, but still more of the privations
to which he was subjected from his very earliest
years. His productions are enormous, even when
measured by those of the two great German com
posers just named, or even of Beethoven, who
lived to nearly double his years. At an age when
Beethoven had produced one Symphony, he had
written ten, besides all the mass of works great
and small which form the extraordinary list in
the Appendix to this article. 'Fairer hopes'?
Had he lived, who can doubt that he would have
thrown into the shade all his former achieve
ments ? But as we have endeavoured to explain,
his music came so easily and rapidly that it was
probably not exhausting. It was his privations,
his absolute poverty, and the distress which he
naturally felt at finding that no exertions could
improve his circumstances, or raise him in the
scale of existence, that in the end dragged him
down. His poverty is shocking to think of.
Nearly the first distinct glimpse we catch of him
is in the winter of 1812, supplicating his brother
for a roll, some apples, or a few halfpence, to keep
off the hunger of the long fast in the freezing
rooms of the Convict. Within a year of his death
we catch sight of him again, putting up with coffee
and biscuits because he has not 8%d. to buy his
dinner with; selling his great Trio for 1 715. 6d. and
his songs at lorZ. each, and dying the possessor
of effects which were valued at little more than
two pounds. Beside this the poverty of Mozart
— the first of the two great musicians whom
Vienna has allowed to starve — was wealth.
Such facts as these reduce the so-called friend
ship of his associates to its right level. With his
astonishing power of production the commonest
care would have ensured him a good living ; and
that no one of his set was found devoted enough
to take this care for him, and exercise that watch
over ways and means which Nature had denied
to his own genius, is a discredit to them all.
They prate of their devotion to their friend, when
not one of them had the will or the wit to prevent
him from starving ; for such want as he often
endured must inevitably have injured him, and
we cannot doubt that his death was hastened by
the absence of those comforts, not to say neces
saries, which should have nursed and restored the
prodigal expenditure of his brain and nerves.
We are accustomed to think of Beethoven's
end as solitary and his death as miserable, but
what was his last illness compared to Schubert's ?
Officious friends, like Pasqualati, sending him
wine and delicacies ; worshipping musicians, like
Hummel and Hiller, coming to his deathbed as
if to a shrine ; his faithful attendants, Schindler,
Hiittenbrenner and Breuning waiting on his
every wish ; the sense of a long life of honour
and renown ; of great works appreciated and
beloved; the homage of distant countries, ex
pressed in the most substantial forms — what a
contrast to the lonely early deathbed, and the
apparent wreck of such an end as Schubert's !
Time has so altered the public sense of his merits
VOL, in. PT. 3.
SCHUBERT.
369
that it is all but impossible to place oneself in
the forlorn condition in which he must have
resigned himself to his departure, and to realise
the darkness of the valley of the shadow of
death through which his simple sincere guileless
soul passed to its last rest, and to the joyful
resurrection and glorious renown which have
since attended it. Then an intelligent and well-
informed foreign musician could visit the Aus
trian capital and live in its musical circles,
without so much as hearing Schubert's name.1
Now memorials are erected to him in the most
public places of Vienna, institutions are proud
to bear his name, his works go through countless
editions, and publishers grow rich upon the pro
ceeds even of single songs, while faces brighten
and soften, and hands are clasped, as we drink in
the gay and pathetic accents of his music.
For even his privations and his obscurity have
now been forgotten in the justice since done to
him, and in the universal affection with which
he was regarded as soon as his works reached
the outside world — an affection which, as we
have conclusively shown, has gone on increasing
ever since his death. In the whole range of
composers it may be truly said that no one is
now so dearly loved as he, no one has the happy
power so completely of attracting both the ad
miration and the affection of his hearers. To
each one he is not only a great musician, not
only a great enchanter, but a dear personal
friend. If in his ' second state sublime ' he can
know this, we may feel sure that it is a full
compensation to his affectionate spirit for the
many wrongs and disappointments that he en
dured while on earth.
The very wide field over which Schubert ranged
in poetry has been more than once alluded to in
the foregoing. It would be both interesting and
profitable to give a list of the poems which he
has set. Such a list, not without inaccuracies,
will be found in Wurzbach's ' Biographical Lexi
con,' vol. xxxii. p. 94. Here we can only say
that it includes 634 poems, by 100 authors, of
whom the principal are : —
Goethe 72; Schiller 54; Mayrhofer4S; Holty
25; Matthisson 2 7 ; Kosegarten 20 ; F. Schlegel
19; Klopstock 19; Korner 16; Schober 15;
Seidl 15 ; Salis 14; Claudius 13 ; Walter Scott
10; Rellstab 9; Uz 8; Ossian 7; Heine 6;
Shakspeare 3 ; Pope I ; Colley Gibber I ; etc. etc.
Compared with the literature on other com
posers that on Schubert is not extensive.
Biographical. — The original sources are scat
tered in German periodicals and elsewhere.
1. The first place must be given to Ferdinand Schu
bert's sketch, entitled 'Aus Franz Schuberts Leben,1
four short papers which appeared in Schumann's p ?riod-
ical, the 'Neue Zeitschrit't fur Musik,' in Nos. 33-36
(April 23— May 3), 1839. These are written with great
simplicity, and apparently great exactness ; but might
1 The allusion is to E. Holmes, the biographer of Mozart, who
passed some time in Vienna in the spring ot 1827, evidently with the
view of finding out all that was best worth knowing in music, and yt
does not mention Schubert's name. (See his 'Kamble among the
Musicians of Germany.')
Bb
370
SCHUBERT.
have been extended to double the length with great
advantage. 2. Mayrhofer contributed a short article of
recollections, ' Erinnerungen,' to the ' Neues Archiv ftir
Geschichte Literatur und Kunst ' (Vienna), Feb. 23,
1829; and Bauerni'eld a longer paper. 'Ueber Franz
Schubert,' to Nos. 69, 70, 71 of the « Wiener Zeitschrift
fur Kunst, Literatur, Theater, und Mode,' for June 9,
11, 13, 1829. These papers, written so shortly after Schu
bert's death by men extremely intimate with him, are
very valuable. 3. Bauernfeld also made two interesting
communications to the 'Freie Presse' of Vienna for
April 17 and 21, 1869, containing six letters and parts of
letters by Schubert, and many anecdotes. These latter
articles were reprinted in the Leipzig 'Signale' for
Nov. 15, 22, 26, 28, 1869 ; and in Bauernfeld's ' Gesam-
melte Schriften,' vol. xii (Vienna 1873). But recollec
tions written so long after the event must always be
taken cum grano. 4. Schindler wrote an article in
'Bauerle's Wiener Theaterzeitung ' for May 3, 1831, de
scribing Beethoven's making acquaintance with Schu
bert's songs on his death-bed ; and other articles in the
' Niederrheinischer Musikzeitung ' for 1857 . He al so men
tions Schubert in his ' Life of Beethoven,' 3rd ed., ii. 136.
5. Schumann printed four letters (incomplete), two
poems, and a Dream, by Schubert, as ' Keliquien ' in his
' Neue Zeitschrift fUr Musik ' for Feb. 1 and 5, 1839. 6.
One of the same letters was printed complete in the
' Signale,' No. 2, for 1878. 7. The Diary of Sofie Mtiller
(Vienna 1832), the ' Unvergessenes ' of Frau von Chezy
(Leipzig 1858), and the ' Erinnerungen ' of her son W.
von Chezy (Schaffhausen 1863), all afford original facts
about Schubert by those who knew him ; and 8. Ferd.
Hiller's KUnstlerleben (Cologne 1880) contains a paper —
' Vienna 52 years since '—embodying a few interesting
and lifelike notices of the year 1827. Of all these use
has been made in the foregoing pages.
9. The first attempt to write a life of Schubert was
made by von Kreissle, who in 1861 published a small
8yo pamphlet of 165 pages, entitled 'Franz Schubert, eine
biografische Skizze; von Dr. Heinrich von Kreissle.'
This is a very interesting little book, and though not
nearly so long as the second edition, it contains some
facts which have dropt out of that. 10. The second
edition — 'Franz Schubert, von Dr. Heinrich Kreissle
von Hellborn ' (Vienna, Gerold, 1865), is a large 8vo
of 619 pages, with portrait after Kupelwieser. This is a
thoroughly honest, affectionate book; but it is deformed,
like many German biographies, by a very diffuse style,
and a mass of unnecessary matter in the shape of de
tailed notices of every one who came into contact with
Schubert ; and some of the letters appear to be garbled ;
but the analyses of the operas and the lists of works are
valuable, and there are some interesting facts gathered
from the Frohlichs, Ferdinand Schubert, Spaun, Htitten-
brenner. and others. It has been translated into English
by Mr. A. D. Coleridge (2 vols. 8vo, Longman, 1869), with
an Appendix by the present writer containing the themes
and particulars of the MS. Symphonies and other MS.
music of Schubert, as seen by Mr. Sullivan and him in
Vienna in 1867. A resum£ of the work is given in English
by Wilberforce, ' Franz Schubert ' etc. (Lond9n 1866). 11.
Both Kreissle's works have been largely utilised by H.
Barbedette, in 'F. Schubert, sa vie etc. (Paris 1866).
This contains an atrocious version of Kieder's portrait,
and one new fact — a facsimile of Schober's song 'An die
musik,' valuable because being dated April 24, 1827 (while
the song was composed in 1817) it shows that Schubert
did not confine his dates to the original autographs
(compare 'The Trout,' p. 329, note 4).
12. The chief value of Beissmann's book, 'Franz Schu
bert, sein Leben u. seine Werke' (Berlin 1873), consists
in the extracts from the juvenile MS. songs, Quintet
overture (pp. 12— 30 >, the comparisons of early songs with
later revisions of the same (pp. 24, 154 etc.), 5 pieces printed
for the first time, and Facsimile of a MS. page. 13. Gum-
precht, La Mara, and others, have included sketches of
Schubert in their works.
14. The article on Schubert in Wurzbach's Biogra-
phisches Lexicon (Part 32, pp. 30—110 ; Vienna 1876) is a
good mixture of unwearied research, enthusiasm for his
hero, and contempt for those who misjudge him (see for
example p. 98 1). The copious lists are extremely inter
esting and useful. Unfortunately they cannot always be
trusted, and the quotations are sometimes curiously in
correct. Thus Mr. Arthur Duke Coleridge is raised to
the peerage as ' Herzog Arthur von Coleridge ' etc., etc.
Still all students of Schubert should be grateful for the
article.
15. The facsimile of the Erlking in its first form has
been mentioned in the body of the article (p. 324 6).
Further consideration convinces me that the original of
this cannot be the first autograph, but must be a copy
made afterwards by Schubert.
SCHUBERT.
Two documents must be mentioned. 16. 'Actenmassige
Darstelling der Ausgrabung und Wiederbeisetzung der
irdischen Reste von Beethoven und Schubert ' (Vienna
1863), and 17. ' Vom Wiener Mannergesangverein. Fest
schrift zur Enthtillung des Schubert Denkmales am 15
Mai, 1872,' an account of the unveiling of the statue in
the Stadt Park, containing a capital sketch of Schubert's
Life, Lists, and many other welcome facts. Herr Dumba's
speech on the occasion, and poems by Bauernfeld and
»Weilen were printed separately. Good photographs of
the statue are published by Lowy of Vienna.
18. Since writing the foregoing I have seen the ' Life
and Works of Schubert,' by A. Niggli, which forms No. 15
of Breitkopf and Hartel's Mmikalische Vortrage (1880).
It appears to be an excellent and generally an accurate i
compilation, with a great deal of information in small
compass, but wants a list of works to make it complete.
Also 19. a Life by H. F. Frost in ' The Great Musicians,
edited by Francis Huefi'er ' (London 1881), readable and
intelligent, and has a list of works year by year.
Thematic Catalogues.
Of these there are two : —
1. ' Thematisches Verzeichniss im Druck erschienenen
Compositionen von Franz Schubert. Vienna, Diabelli'
[1852], contains the works from Opus 1 to 160 ; Schwanen-
gesaiig ; Lieferungen 1 to 50 ; and 30 songs (included in
the foregoing) of a series entitled ' Immortellen.'
2. 'Thematisches Verzeichniss der im Druck erschie
nenen Werke von Franz Schubert, herausgegeben von
G. Nottebohm. Vienna, F. Schreiber, 1874, pages 1-288.'
This admirable work is as comprehensive and accurate
as the previous publications of its author would imply
its being. Under the head of printed works it com
prises:— (1) works with opus numbers 1-173. (2) Nachge-
lassene Mus. Dichtungen, Lieferungen 1-50. (3) Works
without opus numbers for orchestra, chamber-music,
etc. (4) Doubtful and spurious compositions; works
still in MS.; books, portraits, etc. (5) Index, list of-
songs, etc.
The information under each piece is not confined to
the name and date of publication, but gives in most cases
the date of composition, and frequently also such facts
as the first time of performance, etc. It is in fact, like
all Mr. Nottebohm's publications, a model of what such
a catalogue should be.
Schubert's Letters, etc.
Date.
Place.
Addressed to.
Where printed.
1812. Nov. 24
Vienna
Ferd. Schubert
N.Z.M. Feb. 1, 1839.2
1813. Sept. 27
Poem for his fa
K.H. 30 note (i. 30).3
ther's birthday
1815. Sept. 27
Poem for his fa
K_H. 30 note (i. 31 .
ther's birthday
1816. June 16
Poem for Salieri's
K.H. 82 note (i. 83).
jubilee
June 13-16
Diary
K.H. 103-105(1. 103).
1817. Aug. 24
Lied. 'Abschied v.
Lief. xxix. 4.
e. Freuude '
1818. Feb.2(?)
J. Hiittenbrenner
K.H. 125 (i. 129).
Aug. 3
Zek!sz
Schober
Bauernfeld, in Die Presse,
Ap. 17, 1869; Siguale,
1869, p. 978.
Aug. 24
Zele"sz
Ferd. Schubert
Diet, of Music, iii. 330.
1819. (?)
• • •
J. Hiittenbrenner
K.H. 126 note (i. 130).
May 19
• • •
A. Hiittenbrenner
K.H. 152 (i. 154).
July 15
Steyr
Ferd. Schubert
K.H. 158 (i. 159).
Aug. 19
Linz
Mayrhofer
K.H. 159 (i. 160).
Sept. H
Steyr
K. Stadler's album
K.H. 160 note (i. 161).
1820. Sept.
• • •
Poem, ' Lasst sie
N.Z.M. Feb. 5, 1839.
nur'
1821. Nov. 2
Vienna
Spaun
K.H. 231 (i. 234), PS. to
Schober's letter.
1822. (?)
(?)
Hiittenbrenner (?)
K.H. 236 note (i. 239).
JulyS
...
' My dream '
N.Z.M. Feb. 5. 1839.
Oct. 31
Vienna
Siittenbrenner
MS. (in my possession).
1823. Feb. 28
Vienna
von Mosel
Neue Freie Presse, Nov.
19, 1881.
May8
(?)
' My prayer,' Poem
N.Z.M. Feb. 5, 1839.
Nov. 30
Vienna
Schober
Bauernfeld.in Die Presse,
April 17. 1869; Signale,
1869, p. 979.
1 I am sorry to find the inscription on the tomb very incorrectly
given.
2 N.Z.M, = Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik.
3 K.H. = Kreissle von Hellborn, Life of Schubert. The references
in parentheses are to Coleridge's translation.
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
371
Date.
Place.
Addressed to.
Wnere printed.
1824.Mar.27-9
Vienna
Diary
K.H. 322 (ii. 5, 6).
Mar. 31
„
Kupelwieser
K.H. 319 (ii. 2).
July 16-18
Zeldsz
Ferd. Schubert
Signale, 1878. p. 17.
Sept. 21
.
Schober.withPoem
Bauernfeld, Die Presse,
' Klage an das
April 17, 1869 ; Signale,
Volk'
1J?69, p. 9>0.
1825. July 21
Linz
Spaun
K.H. 341 (ii. 25).
July 25
Steyr
Father and mother
N.Z.M. Feb. 1839.
(?)
Gmunden
Steiger
K.H. 372 note (ii. 58).
Sept. 12-21
,,
Ferd. Schubert
N.Z.M. Feb. 5, 1839.
Sept. 18-19
Steyr
Bauernfeld
K.H. 370 (ii. 66).
Oct. 10
Vienna
Committee of Mu-
Pobl 16.
sikverein
1826. May
Vienna (?)
Bauernfeld and
Bauernfeld, Die Presse,
Mayrholer
April 21. 1?69 ; Siguale,
1869, p. 1011.
1827. June 12
Vienna (?)
Mad. Pachler
K.H. 398 (ii. 84).
June 13
Vienna
Committee of Mu-
Pobl, 17.
sikverein
Sept. 27
t»
Herr Pachler
K.H. 402 (ii. 89).
Oct. 12
,,
Mad. Pachler, with
K.H. 404 (ii. 91).
march
1828. Jan. 18
Vienna
Hiittenbrenner
K.H. 417 (ii. 104).
Aug. 1
.,(?)
H. A. Probst
K.H. 435 (ii. 122).
Bept. 25
tf
Jenger
K.H. 437 (ii. 124).
(?)
..(?)
Sonnleithner
K.H. 515 (ii. 199).
Nov.U
H
Schober
Bauernfeld, Presse, 1869;
Signale, 1869, p. 1028.
I. Alphabetical Lists.
I. Published Songs. (457.)
Those with opus-numbers extend to op. 173. Then
follow the Schwanengesang — 'Schw. No. i,'
etc.; then the ' Nachgelassene Musikalische
Dichtungen' in 50 Lieferungen — ' Lf. i.' etc. ;
then 4 Lieder — « 4 L. i,' etc. ; then 6 Lieder —
'6 L. No. i,' etc. ; then 40 Lieder — ' 40 L. i,'
etc. (See Nottebohm's Catalogue.) Where a
song is given twice under different titles an
* is prefixed to the second insertion.
Cols. 4 and 5 refer to the editions of Litolff and
Senff. LitolfFs includes ops. 1-131, and Lieff.
1-50, in consecutive order ; but omits ops. 2 1 ;
52, nos. 3 and 4; 60; 83 ; no; 129; and Lief.
43. Senff's — edited by Julius Rietz — includes
ops. 1-131, and Lieff. 1-50, but differently
arranged ; and omits ops. 52, nos. 3 and 4 ; 62,
no. i; 129. Peters's edition is more com
plete, but was not known to the author in
time. A complete critical edition of all the
songs in chronological order of composition
is much wanted.
The following abbreviations of publishers' names
are used : — G-otth. = Gotthard ; Hasl. = Has-
linger ; Mech. = Mechetti ; Riet. B. = Rieter-
Biedermann; Schreib. = Schreiber ; Whistl. =
Whistling; Witznd.=Witzendorf ; B. &H.=
Breitkopf & Hartel.
Eeissm. = Reissmann's * Franz Schubert,' etc.,
1873, the Appendix to which contains some
songs.
Title.
Date.
Opus No.
Litolff.
Senff.
Abend, der
Abendbilder
Abend! led derFurstin
Abendlied fur die Entfernte
Abendroth, das
AbendrOthe . '.
Abendstera
1815
1819
1816
1825
1818
1820
1820
Op. 118. 2
Lf. ix. 3
6 L. No. 6
Op. 88. 1.
Op. 173. 6
Lf. vii. 3
Lf. xxil. 4
vi.26
vii. 71
iv.43
vii. 36
viii. 143
x. 26
xv. 20
vi.88
xv. 9
xvii. 17
Title.
Date
Opus No.
Litolff.
Benff.
Abends unter der Linde .
Abgebliihte Linde, die .
1815
1828
40 L. No. 10
Op. 7. 1
Schw. No. 7
1.58
x. 142
i.67
xi 38
Abschied von einem Freunde
Ach, was soil ich (' Lacrimas ')
1817
1825
1815
Lf. xxix. 4
Op. 124. 1
Lf xlii. 5
Ix. 83
Vi. 67
x. 36
xviii. 17
x. 66
xx. 10
Aeschylus, Fragment aus
Alinde
1816
1816
Lf. xiv. 2
Op. 81. 1
viii. 17
iv.l
xiv. 77
vl. 46
Alles vergeht. 'Wehmuth' .
Allmacht. die .
AlpenjSger, der (Mayrhofer) .
Alpenjfiger, der (Schiller) .
AIs ich sie errOthen sab, .
Altschottische Ballade .
1825
1817
1817
1815
1827
1815
Op. 22. 2
Op. 79. 2
Op. 13. 3
Op. 37. 2
Lf. xxxix. 1
Op. 165. 5
Op. 173. 1
i. 144
iii. 135
i.99
ii. 109
Z.I
ii. 90
vi.26
ii. 22
iv.41
xix. 42
Am Bach im Friihlinge .
Am Feierabend (Miillerl.) .
Am Fenster ....
Am Flusse
1816
1823
1826
1822
Op. 109. 1
Op. 25. 5
Op. 105. 3
40 L 3
v. 127
ii.17
v. 84
ix. 61
iii. 16
ix. 16
Am Grabe Anselmos .
1816
1828
Op. 6, 3
Schw No 12
i. 56
x. 159
i. 64
Am See
1817
Lf ix 2
vii. 68
TV IS
Am Strome
Ammenlied
An den Fruhling .
An den Mond (Goethe)
Do. Do.
An den Mond (HOlty)
An d. Mond in e. Herbstnacht
An den Tod ....
An die Apfelbfiume, etc.
An die Entfernte
AndieFreude (Schiller)
An die Freunde
An die Laute ....
An die Leier .
1817
1814
1815
1815
IMS
1815
1818
1815
1822
1815
1819
1816
Op. 8. 4
40 L. 12
Op. 172. 5
LI. xlvil. 5
6 L. No. 3
Op. 67. 3
Lf. xviil. 2
Lf. xvii. 3
Lf. i. 1
6 L. No. 4
Op. 111. 1
Lf. xl. 3
Op. 81. 2
Hr» P>A *2
i.77
x. 77
iii. 00
viii. 73
viii. 61
x.99
7.134
x.15
iv. 6
i. 91
xiv. 45
v.25
xvi. 42
xvi. 28
xx. 74
ix. 76
xix. 58
vi.52
v. 10
An die Musik ....
An die Nachtigall (Claudius)
An die Nachtigall (Haity) .
An die Sonne (' Kan. Morgens.'.
An die Sonne (Baumberg) .
An die Thuren (Harfner)
An die untergehende Sonne .
An eine Quelle ....
1817
1816
1815
1815
1815
1816
1816
1816
1814
Op. 88. 4
Op. 98. 1
Op. 172. 3
40 L. 9
Op. 118. 5
Op. 12. 3
Op. 44.
Op. 109. 3
Tit' YYYl <l
iv. 57
v. 61
vi. SO
i. 86
iii. 1
v. 132
ix 97
vi. 103
viii. 78
x. 32
ii. 10
iv.89
ix. 67
xviii 81
An mein Herz ....
An Miguon (' Ueber Thai') .
An Schwager Kronos
An Sylvia (Shakspeare)
Anne Lyle, Lied der (ticott).
Antigone und Oedip . .
Art ein Weib zu nehmen, die
(11 modo di prender) .
1&25
1815
1816
1826
1825
1817
1823
1828
Lf. xiii. 1
Op. 19. 2
Op. 19. 1
Op. 106. 4
Op. 85,1
Op. 6. 2
Op. 83. 3
Schw. No 8
viii. 1
i. 119
i. 114
V. 107
iv.10
i. 51
x 148
xv. 53
ii.46
ii. 39
ix. 41
vi. 56
.58
x\ 46
Atys
Lf. xxii. 2
viii. 131
Auf dem Flusse fWinterreise)
Auf dem See ....
Auf dem Strom
Auf dem Wasser zu singen
(Barcarolle)
Auf der Briicke ....
AufderDonau ....
Auf der Riesenkoppe .
Auf einem Kirchhof .
Aufentbalt ....
1827
1817
1828
1823
1825
1817
1818
1818
1828
1824
Op, 89. 7
Op. 92. 2
Op. 119
Op. 72
Op. 93. 2
Op. 21. 1
Lf. xlix. 1
Lf. xlix. 2
Schw. No. 5
Lf xxxiv 1
iv. 84
iv. 149
vi.32
lii. 115
v. 13
x. 90
x.94
x. 131
v 19T
vij. 29
viii. 8
x.35
vi.8
viii. 26
i.68
xx. 64
xx. 68
xi. 26
V1T 9
Lf 1 3
X7Q
Aus ' Diego Manzanares .
Aus ' Heliopolis "...
' Ave Maria.' (Walter Scott) .
Baches Wiegenlied (THiillerl.) .
•Barcarolle ('Auf demWasser ')
Bei dir allein
1816
1822
1825
1823
1823
OL. 25
Op. 65. 3
Op. 52. 6
Op. 25. 20
Op. 72
On Q^I 9
ii. 104
ii.28
i.n
ii. 115
v. 78
v.114
ii. 62
vl.8
triii JA
BeimWinde ....
Berge, die
1819
Lf. xxii. 8
Op 57 2
f. aa
Viii. 137
xvii. 11
v 22
Bertha's Lied in der Nacht ,
Betende, die
Bild, das .
Blinde Knabe, der .
Blondel zu Marien . °
Blumenbrief, der
Blumenschmerz, der .
Blumensprache, die
BOse Farbe, die
Biirgschaft, die ...
CISrchen's Lied (' Freudvoll ')
Cora aa die Sonne .
1819
1814
1815
1825
1819
1818
1821
1823
1815
1815
1815
IRlft
Lf. xl. 2
;f. XXXI. 1
Op. 165. 3
Op. 101.
jf. xxxiv. 2
Lf. xxi. 1
Op. 173. 4
Op. 173. 5
Op. 25. 17
Lf. viii.
Lf. xxx. 2
Lf. xlii. 3
Lf ii 1
. 57
x. 13
LX. 92
v.67
x.132
Viii. 112
i.61
vii. 43
X. 89
x. 34
vi. 114
xix. 55
xviii. 25
riii. 85
xix. 8
xvi. 63
ii. 52
xiii. 14
xiv. 24
xx. 8
xi\ IS
Dankgesang an den Bach
(Mullerlieder; .
1823
Op. 25. 4
]
i. 14.
3b2
ii. 14
372
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
Title.
' Da quel sembiante '
Das war ich
Dass sie hier gewesen
•Delphine (' Lacrimas ')
Dem TJnendlicben .
Der Vollraond strahlt .
Des Jammers herbe Qualen
(Pierabras)
Die Mutter hat mir .
Dithyrambe (Nimrner das
glaubtmir) .
DoppelgSnger, der .
Drang in die Ferae .
Du bist die Run
Du liebst mich nicht
Du sagtest mir . . .
Echo, das ....
Edone
Eifersucht und Stolz (Miil-
lerlieder) ....
Ein Blickvon deinen Augen .
Ein Fr&ulein schaut
Einsame, der (Lappe) .
Einsamkeit (Mayrhofer)
Einsamkeit (Winterreise) .
Einsiedelei, die .
Ellen's 1st Song, ' Soldier'
rest ' (Walter Scott) .
Ellen's 2nd Song, • Huntsman,
rest ' (Walter Scott) .
*Ellen's 3rd Song, ' Ave Maria '
(Walter Scott)
Elysium
Emma ....
Entsuhnte Orest, der . '.
Epistel von M. v. Collin .
Erinnerung ....
Erlafsee ....
ErlkOnig ..'.'.'.
Erntelied ....
Erstarrung (Winterreise)
Erste Liebe, die ...
Erster Verlust ,
Erwartung, die .
Fahrt zum Hades .
Finden, das ...
Fischer, der ....
FischermSdchen
Fischersliebesgliick, des .
Fischerweise
*Florio ('Lacrimas')
Fluchtling, der .
Flug der Zeit, der . \ '.
Fluss, der
Forelle, die . . . .
*Fragment aus dem Aeschylus
Fragment aus 'die Cotter
GriechenJands '
Freiwilliges Versinken .
*' Freudvoll und Leidvoll '
Frohsinn .
Fruhen GrSber .
Friihlingsglaube . '. ',
Fruhlingssehnsucht
Friihlingstraum (Winterr.) '
Fiille der Liebe
Date.
1820
1815
1823?
1825
1815
1823
1823
Opus No.
1823?
1823
1825
1816
1819
1824?
1825
1818
1827
1817
1825
1825
1825
1815
1814
1820
i 22
1815
1817
5 Canti. No.S
Lf. xxxix. 2
Op. 59. 2
Op. 124. 1
Lf. x. 1
Op. 26
Op. 76
Op. 95. 1
Op. 60. 2
Schw. No. 13
Op. 71
Op. 59. 3
Op. 59. 1
Op. 95. 3
Op. 130.
Lf. xxviii. 4
Op. 25. 15
Op. 165. 1
Op. 120
Op. 41
Lf. xxxii.
Op. 89. 12
Ulolff.
x. 6
iii. 79
vi. 67
Vii. 79
ii. 74
v. 20
x. 161
iii. 110
iii. 82
iii. 77
vi. 88
ix. 71
ii. 54
vi. 80
ii. 140
ix. 100
iv. 102
1816
1827
1815
1815
1815
Ganymed
Gebet wfihrend der Schlacht'
Gefangenen Sanger, die .
Gefrorne Thra'nen (Winterr.)
Geheimes
Geheimniss, das (Schiller) .
Do. Do. .
Geist der LJebe (Kosegarten)
Geistertanz, der
Gelstesgruss .
Geistliche Lieder
Geniigsamhelt .
Gesang der Norna .
Gestirne, die ....
Gestflrte Cluck, das .
Get&uschte Verrather, der .
Glaube, Hoffnung, und Liebe
Goldschmiedsgesell, der .
Gondelfahrer, cTer .
•GCtter Griechenlands, Frag
ment aus die .
Grablied
Grablled auf ein. Soldaten
Grablied fflr die Mutter .
1817
1815
1815
1828
1827
1826
1825
1816
1820
1817
1816
Lf. xxxviii. 1 ix. 159
1820
1815
1817
1815
I1 22
1828
1827
1825
1817
1815
1821
1827
1821
1823
1815
1815
1814
1816
1815
1827
1816
1815
1827
1828
1824
1815
1816
1818
Op. 52. 1
Op. 52. 2
Op. 52. 6
Lf. vi.
Op. 58. 2
Lf.xi.2
Lf. xlvi.
Op. 108. 3
Op. 8. 3
Op. 1
Lf. xlviii. 2
Op. 89. 4
Lf. xxxv. 1
Op. 5. 4
Op. 116
Lf. xviii. 3
Lf. xlii. 2
Op. 5. 3
Schw. No. 10
Lf. xxvii. 3
Op. 96. 4
Op. 124. 2
40 L. 36
Op. 7. 2
40 L. 27
Op. 32
Lf. xiv. 2
Lf. xlti. 1
Lf. xi. 4
Lf. xxx. 2
Lf. xlv. 1
Lf. xxviii. 5
Op. 20. 2
Schw. No. 3
Op. 89. 11
Lf. xxr. 1
Op. 19. 3
Lf. x. 7
Lf. xxxiii. 2
Op. 89. 3
Op. 14. 2
Op. 173. 2
40 L. 28.
Op. 118. 1
Lf. xxxi. 2
Op. 92. 3
Lf. x.
Op. 109. 2
Op. 85. 2
Lf. x. 2
40 L. 8
Op. 83. 2
Op. 97
Lf. xlviii. 6
40 L. 2
iii. 6
iii. 16
iii. 28
vii. 17
Iii. 69
vii. 105
x. 58
v. 124
i.74
i. 1
x. 80
iv. 69
ix. 135
i. 43
vi.l
viil. 81
x. 32
i.40
x. 1,53
ix. 59
v. 51
vi. 77
i. 63
ii.86
viii. 17
x. 30
vii. 112
ix. 89
x. 50
ix.73
1.132
x. 121
iv. 97
ix. 33
i. 123
v.'i. 97
ix. 123
iv. 67
i. Ill
vi. 24
ix. 94
iv. 149
vii .79-102
v. 329
iv. 15
vii. 86
v. 56
x. 88,
Senff.
xix. 48
v. 47
x. 66
xiv. 48
iv. 3
vlii. 43
v. 59
xi. 63
vi. S
V. 49
V.44
X. 86
xiv. 68
iii. 46
x.79
iv.74
xviii. 34
vii. 48
xix. 37
iv. 94
iv.102
iv. 114
xiii. 2
v.35
xv. 44
xx. 47
x. 58
i. 87
.3
xx. 56
vii. 13
xix. 11
i.48
x. 3
xvi. 50
xx. 7
i. 45
xi. 52
xviii. 9
viii. 69
x. 76
i.72
iv. 15
xiv. 77
xiii. 76
xv. 51
xiv. 24
xx. 36
xiv. 70
ii. 61
xi. 17
vii. 43
xvii. 52
ii. 51
xv. 86
xviii. 58
vii. 10
ii. 36
Lf. xlii. 1
Lf. xlii. 4
40 L. 6
Lf. xxx. 3
x. 30
x. 35
ix. 90
x. 24
xviii. 28
viii. 13
ix. 64
vi. 61
xiv. 54
viii. 74
xiv. 47
Title.
Greise Kopf, der (Winterreise)
Greisengesang .
Grenzen der Menschheit
Gretchen am Spinnrade .
Gretchen im Dom .
Gretchen's Bitte
Gruppe aus dem Tartarus
'Guarda che bianca'
Gute Hirt. der .
Gute Nacht (Winterreise) .
HSnfling-s LJebeswerbung
Halleluja, der grosse
Halt (Miillerlieder)
llarfners, GesSnge des, No. 1 .
Do. Do. No. 2 .
5 Do. Do. No. 3.
Hark, Hark, the lark
Heidenro'slein ....
Heimliches Lieben .
Heimweh, das ....
Heiss mich nicht reden .
Do, Do.
Hektor's Abschied .
Heliopolis, Aus
Heliopolis (Fels auf Felsen)
Herbstlied
Hermann und Thusnelda
Himmelsfunken
Hippolit's Lied ....
Hirt auf dem Felsen, der
Hoffnung (Goethe)
Hoffnung (Schiller)
Hoffnung, die CSchiller)
#' Huntsman, rest ' (Scott) .
*Hymn to the Virgin, ' Ave
Maria* tee Ellen.
Ichsag'esjedem .
IhrBild
Ihr Grab
*I1 modo di prender moglie .
11 traditor deluso .
1m Abendroth ....
1m Dorfe (Winterreise)
1m Freien
ImFruhling ....
1m Haine
Im Walde (Schulze)
In der Feme ....
Incanto degli occhi 1'
Ins stille Land ....
Iphigenia .....
Irdisches Gluck
Irrlicht (Winterreise) .
Date
1827
1820-2
1821
1814
1814
1X17
1817
1820
1816
1827
1817
1816
1823
1816
1816
1816
1826
i 15
1827
1825
• •
1821
1815
1822
1822
1816
1815
1819
1826
1823
1815
1815
1815
1825
Opus No.
Op. 89. 14
Op. 60. 1
Lf. xiv. 1
Op. 2
Lf. xx. 2
Lf. xxix. 3
Op. 24. 1
5 Canti, No.2
40 L. 7
Op. 89. 1
Op. 20. 3
Lf. xli. 2
Op. 25. 3
Op. 12. 1
Do. 2
Do. 3
Lf. vii. 4
Op. 3. 3
Op. 106. 1
Op. 79. 1
Op. 62. 2
Gotthard
Op. 58. 1
Op. 65. 3
LF. xxxvii. 1
40 L. 24
Lf. xrviii. 1
Lf. x. 8
Lf. vii. 2
Op. 129
40 L. 14
40 L. 23
Op. 87. 2
Op. 52. 2
Litolff. Sen/.
iv.108
viii. 12
i. 9
viii. 101
ix. 79
i. 153
1819
1828
1827
1827
1824
1827
1826
1826
iv. 60
i. 135
x. 23
ii.ll
i. 80
i. 83
i.86
vii. 40
i.20
v. 94
iii. 125
iii. 92
iii. 63
iii. 104
ix. 151
ix. 52
vii. 101
vii. 33
xiii. 76
xx. 9
xvlH. 23
Jfiger, der
»' JSger ruhe ' (Walter Scott)
Jfiger's Abendlied .
Jager's Liebeslied .
Jiingling am Bache, der .
Jiingling an der Quelle, der .
Jungling auf dem Hiigel, der .
Jiingling und der Tod, der .
Junge Nonne, die . . .
Kampf, der ....
Kennst du das Land ? (Mignon)
Klage (Trauer umfliesst) .
Klage an den Mond (Holty) .
Klage um Aly Bey .
Klagelied
Knabe, der ....
Knabe in der Wiege, der.
Kolma's Klage ....
KOnig von Thule, der .
KrShe, die (Winterreise) ' .
Kreuzzug, der ....
Kriegers Ahnung .
Lachen und Wetnen
*' Lacrimas,' 2 Scenes from .
Lambertine
La Pastorella .
*Lady of the Lake, 7 songs from
the (Walter Scott)
Laube, die
Lay of the imprisoned Hunts
man (Walter Scott) .
Leben, das
Lebenslied
Lebensmelodien
Lebensmuth (Rellstab)
1825
1828
1827?
1816
1817
1827
1823
1825
1816
1827
1815
1821
1820
1817
1825
1817
1816
1816?
1816
1815
1812
1820
1822
1815
1816
1827
1827
1823
1823?
1823
1815
1817
1825
1815
1825
1815
1816
1816
1828
40L.40
Schw. No. 9
Lf. xxxvi. 3
Op. 83. 3
Op. 83. 2
Lf. xx. 1
Op. 89. 17
Op. 80. 3
Lf. xxv. 2
Op. 56. 3
Op. 93. 1
Schw. No. 6
Op. 83. 1
Lf. xxxix. 3
Op. 98. 3
Op. 95. 4
Op. 89. 9
Op. 25. 14
Op. 52. 2
Op. 96. 2
Op. 96. 2
Op. 87. 3
Lf. xxxvi. 1
Op. 8. 1
40 L. 18
Op. 43. 1
Op. 110
Lf. xx. 3
40 L. 21
Lf. xlviii. 3
Lf. xlv. 3
Op. 131. 3
40 L. 22
40 L. 16
Lf. ii. 2
Op. 5. 5
Op. 89. 15
Lf. xxvii, 2
Schw. No. 2
Op. 59. 4
Op. 124
Lf. xxxvi. 2
40 L. 19
Op. 52
Op. 172. 2
Op. 52. 7
Lf. xliv. 4
Lf. xxxviii. 2
Op. 111. 2
40 L. 17
iv. 34
iii. 16
r. 151
ix. 148
viii. 99
iv. 115
iii. 147
ix.38
iii. 50
v.l
x. 136
x. 10.
v. 64
v. 35
iv.92
ii. 50
iii. 16
i. 22
v. 46
iv. 3?
ix. 143
i.67
ii. 146
viii. 106
x. 82
x. 55
vi.95
vi. 123
i. 44
iv. 110
ix.57
x. 115
iii. 85
vi. 67
ix. 145
iii. 6
iii. 33
x. 48
ix. 161
v. 136
vii. 55
v. 55
xiv. 2
i. 11
xiv. 7
xiv. 12
ii. 102
vii. 2
ii. 65
xiv. 72
iii. 10
ii. 2
ii. 6
ii.10
x.96
i. 24
ix.26
vi. 17
v.65
V.28
v.78
xix. 28
xiv. 56
xv. 39
XV. 6
vi. 79
iv.102
xi. 50
xix. 25
xvi. 61
vii. 63
vi. 39
xvii. 57
v.15
viii. 15
xi.32
xix. 51
viii. 82
viii. 50
vii. 38
iii. 44
iv.102
i. 26
viii. 62
vi. 83
xix. 20
i.78
iv. 80
ix.69
xiv. 16
xx. 58
xx. 42
x.94
xif. 28
i. 49
vii. 57
xviii. 6
xi. 10
v.52
x. 66
xix. 22
iv. 94
iv. 116
xx. S3
xix. 39
Ix. 79
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
Title.
Date.
Opus No-
Litolff.
Senff.
Lebensmuth (Schulze) .
1827
Li, xxvii. 1
viii. 53
xvi.18
Leiden der Trennung
1816
40 L. 32
Leidende, der ....
1816
Lf. 1. 2
x. 102
xx. 77
leiermann, der (Winterreise
1827
Op. 89. 24
iv. 136
vii. 83
Leise flehen meine Lieder
1828
Schw. 4
x. 127
xi. 22
Letzte Hoffnung (Winterreise)
1827
Op. 89. 16
iv. 113
Vii. 60
Licht und Liebe
f t
Lf. xli. 1
x. 18
xx. 2
Liebe Farbe, die (Miillerl.) .
1823
Op. 25. 16
ii. 58
iii. 50
Liebe hat gelogen, die .
. .
Op. 23. 1
i. 146
ii. 92
Liebende Schreibt, die
1819
Op. 165. 1
Liebesbotschaft . .
1828
Schw. No. 1
x. 109
xi. 3
Liebeslauschen .
1820
Lf. xv. 2
viii. 24
xv. 68
Liebesrausch . .
1815
40 L. 29
Liebestandelel . .
1815
40 L. 11
Liebliche Stern, der
1825
Lf. xiii. 2
vill. 8
xv. 60
*Lied der Anne Lyle (Scott) .
1825
Op. 85. 1
iv. 10
vi. 56
Lied d. Mignon (' Nur wer ') .
• •
Op. 62. 4
iii. 97
v.71
»Lied d. Mignon (' Heiss mich '
Op. 62. 3
iii. 92
v. 65
*Lied des gefang.Jfigers (Scott)
1825
Op. 52. 7
iii. 33
iv. 116
Lied d.Mlgnon (' So lasst mich'
.
Op. 62. 3
iii. 94
v. 68
Lied eines Kriegers .
1824
Lf. xxxy. 2
ix. 138
xix. 15
Lied eines Schiffers an die
Dioskuren
1816
Op. 65. 1
iii. 100
v. 74
Lied im Griinen, das
1827
Op. 115. 1
V. 141
ix. 84
•Liederkranz, 6 Lieder . .
f
Op. 165
Liedesend . . . . .
1816
Lf. xxiii. 2
Ix. 7
xvii. 25
Liedler, der ....
1815
Op. 38
ii. 115
iv. 47
Lindenbaum, der (Winterr.)
1827
Op. 89. 5
iv.76
vii. 20
Litanei, a. d. Fest aller Beelen
.
Lf. x. 5
vii. 94
xv. 32
Lob der ThrSnen
1821
Op. 13. 2
il. 94
11. 18
Lob des Tokaiers
1815
Op. 118. 4
vi. 28
x. 30
Loda's Gespenst (Ossian) .
1815
Lf. iii.
vi. 130
xii.34
Macht der Augen, die . .
1827?
Op. 83. 1
Madchen, das ....
1819
Lf. xl. 1
x.ll
xix. 53
Madchens Klage, des . .
1815
Op. 58. 3
iii. 72
V.38
Do. 1st. arrangement
Reism.
Madchen von Inistore, das .
1815
Lf. iv. 3
vi. 157
xii. 63
Manner sind mechant, die .
Op. 95. 3
v. 31
viii. 46
Marienbild, das
1818
Lf. x. 3
vii. 91
xv. 29
Meeresstille ....
1815
Op. 3. 2
i. 19
i. 23
Mein (Miillerlieder) .
1823
Op. 25. 11
ii. 39
iii. 34
Memnon ....
1S17
On fi 1
i *X7
i ^9
•Mignon, Lied d. ('Heiss' mich'
XOJ.I
v/y. D, i.
Op. 62 2
I* O4
iii. 92
1* *j£i
v. 65
* Do. Do.
1821
Gotth.
Mignon, Lied der ('Nur wer')
Op. 62. 4 "
Li. 97
v.71
Do. Do. duet
0 m
Op. 62. 1
iii. 88
Mignon, Lied der ('So lasst
mich') ....
• •
Op. 62. 3
iii. 94
v. 68
Do. Do.
1821
Lf. xlviii. 5
x. 85.
xiv. 21
tMignon's Gesang (' Kennst
du?') ....
1816
Lf. xx. 3
viii. 106
xiv. 16
' Mio ben ricordati ' .
1820
5 Canti, No 4
Mit dem grunen Lautenbande
(Mullerlieder) .
1823
Op. 25. 13
ii. 48
iii. 42
Mondabend, der
Op. 131. 1
vi. 92
x. 90
Morgengruss ....
1823
Op. 25. 8
Ii. 29
iii. 28
Morgenkuss, der (Baumbecg)
1815
Lf. xlv. 4
x.56
xx. 44
Do. Do.
1815
40 L. 33
Morgenlied ....
Op. 4. 2
i 99
I. 32
Miiller und der Bach, der
1. .-Q
(Mullerlieder) .
1823
Op. 25. 19
ii. 68
iii. 59
Mailersblumen, des (Mullerl.)
1823
Op. 25. 9
ii. 32
iii. 30
Musensohn, der
1822
Op. 92. 1
iv. 139
viii. 3
Muth (Winterreise)
1827
Op. 89. 22
iv. 131
vii. 78
Mutter Erde. die ...
1815
Lf. xxix. 2
ix. 77
xviii 14
Nach einem Gewitter .
1817
40 L. 5
Nacht, die (Cz)
1816?
Lf. xliv. 2
x. 43
xx. 29
Kacht, die (Ossian)
1817
Lf. i
Vi. 97
xii. 3
Nachtgesang (Collin) .
Lf. xli. 1
Nachtgesang (Goethe) .
1814
Lf. xlvii. 4
x. 76
xiv. 44
Nachthymne ....
1820
40 L. 4
Nachtstxick ....
1819
Op. 36. 2
ii. 99
iv.SO
Nachtviolenlied
1822
40 L. 20
Nacht und TrSume .
Op. 43. 2
ii. 152
iv. 86
NShe des geliebten .
1815
Op. 5. 2
.38
i.42
Nebensonnen, die (Winterr.)
1827
Op. 89. 23
v. 134
vii. 81
•Simmer, das glaubt mir (Di-
thyrambe)
Op. 60. 2
i. 22
iii. 21
Neugierige, der (Miillerlieder)
1823
Op. 25. 6
'Non t'accostar all* urna '
1820
5 Canti, No.]
Norman's Gesang (Scott) .
1825
Op. 52. 5
ii. 20
v. IOC
•Nun da Schatten ('Lacrimas')
1825
Op. 124. 2
•Nur wer die Sehnsucht kennt
Op. 62. 4
ii. 97
7.71
* Do. duet
• .
Op. 62. 1
ii. 88
Offertorium No. 1 (Totus in
corde)
Op. 46
Offertorium No.2 (Salve regina)
1815
Op. 47
1 1817
•)
Title.
Dale.
Opus No.
Litolff.
Senf.
Offertorium No.S (Salve regina)
1819
Op. 153
Orest auf Tauris
1&20
Lf. xi. 1
vii. 103
xv. 41
1816
Lf. xix. 1
Viii. 86
xvi. 54
Ossian's Lied nach dem Falle
Natbos ....
1815
Lf. iv. 2
vi. 156
xii. —
Pause (Miillerlieder) .
1823
Op. 26. 12
ii. 44
iii. 39
Pax vobiscum ....
1817
Lf . x. 6
vii. 95
xv. 34
' Pensa che questo istante ' .
1813
5 Oanti, No.5
1816
40 L. 31
1817
Lf. xi. 3
vii. 109
xv. 48
Pilgerwelse ....
1823
Lf. xviii. 1
viii. 65
xvi. 33
Op. 37. 1
ii. 105
iv. 36
Post, die (Winterreise) .
1827
Op. 89. 13
iv. 104
vii. 50
Prometheus ....
1819
Lf. xlvii. 1
x.66
xiv. 34
East (Winterreise). .
1827
Op. 89. 10
iv. 94
vii. 40
»' Baste, Krieger • (W. Scott)
1825
Op. 52. 1
iii. 6
Kastlose Liebe ....
1815
Op. 5. 1
i. 34
1.38
Rattenfanger, der .
1815
Lf. xlvii. 3
x.74
xiv. 42
*Refrain-Lieder, 4 ...
Op. 95
v. 20-40
viii.34-5
Bichard Ltfwenherz (W. Scott)
1826
Op. 86
iv. 19
vi. 64
Bitter Toggenburg .
1816
Li. xix. 2
viii. 92
xiii. 70
•Eomanze (E. Fr&ulein klagt
1814
6 L. Xo. 5
*Bosalia von Mortimer (Do-)
. .
6 L. No. 5
*Rosamunde, Bomance from .
1823
Op. 26
ii.74
iv.3
Bose, die
1822
On 71
iii. 122
vi. 14
Rosenband, das
1815
\j i*. i *>
Lf. xxviii. 3
ix. 70
xiv. 66
Riickblick (Winterreise) .
1827
Op. 89. 8
iv. 87
vii. 33
1816
40 L. 15
•Salve Begina ....
1815
Op. 47
1819
Op. 153
Sfinger, der ....
1815
Op. 117
vi. 15
x. 16
Banger's Habe, des ...
1825
Lf. vii. 1
vii. SO
xv. 2
Sangers Morgenlied .
1815
40 L. 35
Scene a. Faust (Wie anders)
1814
Lf. xx. 2
viii. 101
xiv. 7
Schafer's Klagelied .
1815
Op. 3. 1
i.16
i.19
Schafer u. d. Beiter, der.
1817
Op. 13. 1
i. 89
ii. 12
Schatzgrfibers Begehr .
1822
Op. 23. 4
i. 150
ii. 98
Schiffer, der (Mayrhofer) .
Schiffer. der (F. Schlegel) .
1820
Op. 21. 2
Lf. xxxiii. 1
ix. 119
ii. 72
xviii. 54
Schiffers Scheidelied
1827
Lf. xxiv. 1
ix. 12
xvii. 30
Schlummerlied . ...
1817
Op. 24. 2
i. 158
ii. 108
Schmetterling, der .
Op. 57. 1
iii. 54
v. 19
*SchOne Miillerin, die
1823
Op. 25
ii. 1-73
iii.
Schwanengesang (Senn)
Op. 23. 3
i. 139
ii. 96
Schwertlied ....
1813
. .
Beism.
Schwestergruss ....
1822
Lf. xxiil. 1
ix. 1
xvii. 19
Sehnen, das ....
1815
Op. 172. 4
Sehnsucht (Goethe, ' Nur wer ')
• •
Op. 62. 1
iii. 88
Do. Do.
Op. 62. 4
ix. 15
Do. Do.
1815
40 L. 13
iii. 97
v.71
Do. Do. ' Was zieht
1815
Lf. xxxvii. 2
xix. 32
Sehnsucht (Seidl) .
1826
Op. 105. 4
V. 88
ix. 20
Sehnsucht (Mayrhofer) .
1824
Op. 8. 2
i.71
i.83
Sehnsucht (Schiller) 3813 .
1813
6L. No.l
Do. Do. 1815 .
1815
Op. 39
ii. 133
iv. 66
Sei mir gegriisst
1821
Op. 20. 1
1.128
ii. 57
Op. 23. 2
i. 147
ii. 94
Selma und Selmar . . .
1815
Lf. xxviii. 2
ix. 68
xiv. 64
Shilric und Vinvela
1815
Lf. iv. 1
vi. 145
xii. 50
1824
Lf. xxil. 1
viii. 129
xvii. 2
•So lasst mich scheinen .
Op. 62. 3
iii. 94
v. 68
Do. Do.
1821
Lf. xlviii. 5
x. 85
xiv. 21
*' Soldier, rest ' (Walter Scott)
1825
Op. 52. No. 1
iii. 6
iv. 94
So Mancher sieht .
>
Op. 95.4
Spinnerin, die ....
1815
Op. 118. 6
vi. 31
x.33
Sprache der Liebe .
1816
Op. 115. 3
V. 149
ix.92
1828
Schvf. No. 11
_ -| Cft
xi. 56
•Standchen (Bellstab) .
1828
Schw. No. 4
X. lob
x. 127
xi. 22
» Do. (Shakespeare) .
1826
Lf. vll. 4
vii. 40
x. 96
Sterne, die (F. Schlegel)
1820
Lf. xlviii. 1
x.78
xx. 54
Sterne, die (Fellinger) .
1815
40 L. 30
Sterne, die (Leitner)
1823
Op. 96. 1
v. 41
viii. 56
SternennSchte. die . .
1819
Op. 165. 2
Stimme der Liebe .
1816
Lf. xxix. 1
ix. 75
xviii. 12
Stiirmische Morgen. der
(Winterreise) .
1827
Op. 89. 18
iv. 121
vii. 68
1821
Op. 14. 1
i. 103
ii. 26
Suleika's 2nd Song . .
1821
Op. 31
ii. 77
iv. 6
Tantum ergo ....
1822
Op. 45
Taubenpost, die ...
1828
Schw. No. 14
x. 163
xi. 65
Taucher, der ....
1813
Lf. xii
vii. 114
xiii. 36
TSuschung (Winterreise) .
1827
Op. 89. 19
iv. 123
vii. 70
TSuschung, die (Kosegarten)
1815
Op. 165. 4
Thekla (1813) ....
1813
6 L. No.2
Do. (1817) ....
1817
Op. 88. 2
iv. 49
vi. 94
Thranenregen (Mullerlieder)
1823
Op. 25. 10
ii. 35
iii. 32
Tief im Getummel (Alfonso
and Estrella) .
1821-2
Op. 69
374
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
Title.
Date
Opus No.
Litolff.
Senff.
2. Part Songs, etc.
Tiefes Leid
1826
1815
1 - 1 '•
Lf. xxx. 1
Lf. xlviii. 7
Op. 118. 3
ix. 84
x.81
vi. 27
xviii. 18
xx. 62
v 9£
Column i shows the original editions of these,
but they have been collected in two subsequent
Tischlerlied . . .
Tischlled
Todesmuslk .
1822
Op. 108. 2
v. 118
A. —•"
ix. ?
editions by Peters (no. 1045, 1046, 1047), and
Tod Oscar's, der (Ossian) .
Todtengr&bers Heimweh
TodtengrSber-weise .
Tod und das MSdchen, der .
1816
1825
1826
• •
Lf.v
Lf. xxlv. 2
Lf. xv. 3
Op. 7. 3
vii. 1
ix. 28
viii. 30
i. 65
xii. 66
xvii. 46
xv. 74
i. 76
(in 2 vols.) by Spina, edited by Herbeck, who
has in some cases added orchestral accompani
ments to Schubert's sketches. PF. = Pianoforte
Tom lehnt harrend
*Totus in corde
1828
Lf. 15. 1
Op. 46
viil. 20
xv. 64
Accompaniment. Orch. = Orchestra.
Traum, der ....
1815
Op. 172. 1
Trinklied ('Binder') . .
Do. ('Freunde') .
1815
1813
Op. 131. 2
Lf. xlv. 2
vi. 93
x.,61
x.92
xx. 38
1. Foa MALE VOICES. (44.)
No.
Voices.
Peters ed.
(1046).
fferbectt-
Spina.
Do. (Shakspeare) .
1826
Lf. xlviii. 4
x.83
xx. 60
Do. ('Aufl Jedersel')
Trockne Blumeu (Miillerl.) .
Trost
1815
1823
1819
1817
Op. 25. 18
Lf. xliv. 1
4L. 3
H. 65
x. 40
x. 107
HI. 59
xx. 26
Bergknappenlled, PF.
Bootgesang (Scott), PF. .
Deutsche Messe (In Ab)
9 Ge. 4.
Op. 52, 3
• • •
4
4
4
11.37
U.138(Ab
Heft 13
.. 1(C)
Trost im Liede ....
Trost in Thranen .
1814
Lf. XXT. 3
ix. 43
xlv. 32
Dorfchen, das, PF. .
Op. 11,1
4
ii.2
.. 3
Entfernten, der . .
• • •
4
. . .
., 5
*Deber Thai und Fluss .
1815
Op. 19. 2
1.119
ii.46
Ewige Liebe ....
Op. 64, 2
4
. . .
.. 12
Ueber Wildemann .
1826
Op. 108. 1
v. 112
ix. 46
Flucht
Op. 64,3
4
Um Mitternacht
1826
Op. 88. 3
iv. 54
vi. 99
Friihlingslled
Op. 16, 1
4
ii.16
., 31
TTngeduld (Miillerlieder)
1823
Op. 25. 7
11. 25
iii. 24
Geist der Liebe, der, PF. .
Op. 11, 3
4
ii. 12
4
Ungluckliche, der .
1821
Op. 87. 1
Iv. 28
vl.72
Geisterchor (Bosamunde)^
Unterscheidung, die
• •
Op. 95. 1
v. 20
viii. 34
Wind ....
Op. 26, 3
4
11.29
„ 9
Geistertanr, der . .
Gotth.
4
Vater mlt dem Kind, der
1827
Lf. xvil. 2
Till. 58
xvi. 24
Gesang der Geister, etc. .
Op. 167
8
11.121
„ 23
Verfehlte Stunde
1816
40 L. 26
Gondelfahrer, der, PF.
Op. 28
5
ii.32
„ 10
Vergebliche Llebe .
1815
Op. 173. 3
Grab, das ....
9Ge. 5
4
Vergissmeinnlcht .
1823
Lf. xxi. 2
vill. 114
xvi. 66
Grab und Mond . .
• • •
4
ii. 155
Verklfirung ....
1813
Lf. xvil. 4
viii. 63
xvi. 30
Hymn (Herr unser Gott),
Versunken
1821
Lf. xxxviii. 3
ix. 163
xiv. 26
Wind ....
Op. 154
g
ii. 104
20
Vler Weltalter, die .
1816
Op. 111. 3
v. 139
Ix. 82
Viola
1823
Op. 123
vi 1",
Y 48
Im Gegenwfirtlgen Ver-
VOgel, die
1820
Op. 172. 6
VI. ^l*J
A . TZO
gangenes PF. .
Lf. 43
4
ii. 144
,,24
Vom Mltlelden MariS .
1818
Lf. x. 4
vll. 93
xv. 31
Jiinglingswonne .
Op. 17, 1
4
ii. 26
„ 6
Vor meiner Wiege .
1827
Op, 106. 3
v. 103
ix. ?
Liebe
4
ii. 27
Lied im Freien .
9Ge. 3
4
__
Wachtelschlag, der . .
1822
Op. 68
ill. 107
v. 81
Lob d. Einsamkeit .
. . .
4
11.151
„ 28
Waldesnacht ....
1820
Lf. xvi.
viii. 36
xvi. 2
Mondenschein
Op. 102
5
ii. 53
., 14
Wallensteiner Lanzknecht
Morgengesang, 1m Walde,
belm Trunk, der .
1827
Lf. xxvii. 1
ix. 53
xviii. 2
Orch
• • •
4
• • •
Spina
Wanderer, der (Schmidt) .
1816
Op. 4. 1
i.24
i. 28
Nacht, die .
Op. 17, 4
4
ii.28
8
Wanderer, der fF. Schlegel)
Wanderer an den Mond, der .
Wanderers Nachtlied (' Der du
1826
Op. 65. 2
Op. 80. 1
iil. 102
iii. 140
v. 76
vi. 31
Xachtges. imWalde, Horns
Nachthelle, PF. .
Nachtigall die, PF. .
Op. 139 6
Op. 134
Op. 11, 2
4
1&4
4
ii. 82
ii. 67
ii. 7
„ 16
„ 2
von,' Goethe) .
1815
Op. 4. 3
i. 33
i. 37
Nachtmusik. .
Op. 156
4
ii. 116
,, 22
Do. (' Ueber alien,1 Do.)
Wandern, das (Mullerl.)
Wasserfluth (Winterreise) .
Wegweiser, der (Do.) .
1824
1823
1827
1827
Op. 96. 3
Op. 25. 1
Op. 89. 6
Op. 89 20
v. 50
ii. 1
iv. 81
iv. 125
viii. 68
iii. 2
vii. 26
vii. 72
Naturgenuss
Kudlgers Heimkehr, Orch.
Kuhe schSnstes Glfick
Op. 16, 2
Gotth.
4
1&4
4
11.22
il.156
„ 32
,,34(?)
•Wehmuth (M. von Collin) .
Op. 22. 2
1.144
ii. 90
Salve Eegina, Org. . .
Op. 149
4
ii. 93
„ 18
Weinen, das ....
1827
Op. 106. 2
v.100
ix. 32
Schlachtlied, PF.
Op. 151
8
11.98
„ 19
Wenlge wlssen d. Geheimniss
1819
40 L. 37
Sehnsucht (Nur wer) .
• • •
6
• • •
„ 33(?)
Wenn alle untreu .
1819
40L.39
Trinklied (Edit nonna) .
Op. 155
4
11.113
„ 21
Wenn ich dlch holde (Alfonso
Do. (Brvider), PF. .
Op. 131, 2
1&4
ii. 160
andEstrella) .
1821-2
Op. 69
Do. (Freunde), PF. .
Lf. 45, 2
5
ii. 161
Wenn ich ihn nur habe .
1819
40 L. 38
Do. (Funkelnd), PF.
1&4
ii. 158
Wer kauft LiebesgOtter ?
1815
Lf. xlvii. 2
x. 72
xiv. 40
Do. (Auf! Je er),PF.
9 Ge. 2
4
*Wer nle sein Brod .
•Wer sich der Einsamkeit
Wetterfahne, die (Winterr.)
*Widerscheln ....
1816
1816
1827
1QOQ
Op. 12. 2
Op. 12. 1
Op. 89. 2
Lf. xv. 1
1.82
i. 80
iv. 64
viii. 20
ii. 6
ii.2
rii.7
xv. 64
Wehmuth ....
Wein und Liebe . .
Widerspruch, PF.
Op. 64, 1
Op. 105,1
4
4
4
i.40
1.151
1.58
„ 11
„ 30
Widerspruch .
laaQ
Op. 105. 1
v. 72
ix. 3
Zum Bundtanz ...
Op. 17, 3
4
1.27
*Wie anders Gretchen (Faust)
\Vipr1pncoliTi
1814
Lf. xx. 2
viii. 101
xiv. 7
Zur guten Nacht .
Op. 81, 3
1&4
1.52
VT icucracllil • . , .
1825
40 L. 1
i
Wiegenlied (Claudius) .
Wiegenlied (Seidl) .
1816
Op. 98. 2
Op. 105. 2
v. 62
r.78
dii. 80
ix. 9
2. FEMALE VOICES,
withPF. (7.)
Peters ed.
(1047).
Wie Ulfru flscht
Willkommen und Abschled .
Winterabend, der .
•Winterreise ....
Wirthshaus, das (Winterr.).
Wohln (Mullerlieder) .
Wonne der Wehmuth .
1817
1822
1828
1827
1827
1823
1815
Op. 21. 3
Op. 56. 1
Lf. xxvi
Op. 89
Op. 89. 21
Op. 25. 2
Op. 115. 2
ii. 38
Ix. 44
v. 60-138 '
v. 129 '
i. 6
J. 148 i
i. 78
r.3
evil. 62
m.
?ii. 76
ii. 5
i. 91
Coronach (Sir W. Scott) .
Gott In der Natur
Grosse Halleluja, der
Klage um Aly Bey . .
Leben, das ....
Psalm xxiii ....
StSndchen (' ZOgernd ') .
Op. 52, 4
Op. 133
Lf. 41, 2
Lf. 45, 3
Lf. 44, 4
Op. 132
Op. 135
3
4
3
3
3
4
1&4
ii.2
Ii. 9
ii.27
ii.4
ii. 18
Ii. Heft 5
,, 8
.. 7
„ 9
ZfigenglOcklein
lx2i-
Op. 80. 2
11.143
. 34
Zum Punsche ....
1816
Lf. xliv. 3 :
:. 46
:x. —
& MIXED VOICES. (21.)
Peters ed.
(1045).
Zur guten Nacht
1816 (
)p. 81. 3 ,
v. 8 \
i. 54
Ziirnende Barde, der
1823 1
A. ix. 1 v
Ii. 65 s
T. 14
An die Sonne, PF. . . <
> Ge. 6
4
Ziirnenden Diana, der .
1823 (
)p. 36. 1 i
i. 90 i
r. 20
Antiphons for Palm Sun
Zwerg, der
1823 C
>p. 22. 1 i
137 i
.82
day, Org. . . • (
)p. 113
4 i
.28 i
1.6
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
375
3. MrxED VOICES
(continued).
No.
Voices.
Peters ed.
(1045).
SerbecJc-
Spina.
5-
String Quartet*.
Begr&bnisslied,
PF. .
9G«. 8
4
JVC.
Key.
Date.
Opus No. or PttMisner.
Benedictus es
Domine,
Orch. .
.
Op.
150
4
i. 92
ii. 13
1
?
1811
MS.
2
Bb
1812
MS.
Cantata (Spendou), Orch. .
Op.
128
4
i. 31
3
c
MS.
Chor der Engel
(Faust) .
.
.
.
4
i.122
4
MS.
Constitutionslied, Orch. .
Op.
157
4
i. 107
»'
5
C
1813
MS.
Des Tages Weihe, PF.
Op. 146
4
i. 85
ii. 12
6
Bb
MS.
Deutsche Messe & Lord's
7
Eb
ft
MS.
Prayer, Org. (in F) .
Gotth.
4
8
D
MS.
Gebet (' Du Urquell '),
PF.
Op.
139 a
4
i. 75
ii. U
9
D
1814
Peters, No. 796 (8)
Gott derWeltSchSpfer, PF.
Op. 112, 2
4
i. 23
10
Cm
II
MS.
Gott im Ungewitter, PF. .
Op.
112,1
4
i. 16
11
Bb
II
MS.
Hirtenchor (Bosamunde),
Orch
Op. 26, 4
4
i. 6
ii.2
12
13
Bb
Gm
1815
Op. 168
Peters, No. 796 (7)
Hochzeitsbraten, der
Op. ifu.
J4
F
1816
MS.
Hymne an d. Unendlichen.
*rf*
15
Cm
1S20
MS.
PF. .
•
•
Op. 112, 3
4
i.26
16
17
Eb
E
1824
Op. 125, No. 1
Op. 125, No. 2
Jagerchor (Kosamunde),
•J8
Am
Op. 29
Orch. .
•
.
Op.
26,2
4
i.2
11. 1
39
Dm
1825 or 6
Czerny
Lebenslust, PF
.
9 Ge. 7
4
20
G
1826
Op- 161
Osterlied ('
TJebsrwun-
den'), PF
. .
9Ge. 9
4
Psalm xcil .
1 & *
i. 118
6. Symphonies.
Salve Begina, Org. .
.
,
.
4
< ' L
"b. = begun. e
= ended.
Tantum ergo, Orch. .
Op.
45
4
i. 12
11. 3
No.
Key.
Date.
Place.
MS. or Publisher.
3-
Works for the St
ige. (18.)
1
D
e. Oct. 28, 1813 Convict
MS.
0. = Opera. Opt. =
Operetta. Dr. = Drama.
Vienn
i
S. =
Singspiel.
Mel
. = Melodrama.
2
Bb
b. Dec. 10, 1814
e. Mar. 24, 1815
6HTrt *r 0,4 1Q1(t
Vienna
MS.
TITC3
Title.
Dene.
A,cts.
Date.
Op. etc.
3
4
D
Cm
. May 1A, lolo
April 1816
Do.
ula-
MS.
Der Teufels Lustschloss .
Opt.
S
Sept.13-Oct.12,
MS.
'Trag
ische'
Score OT Andante, and 1 r .
arr. of Symphony, 4 hds.
1814
Peters, No.
766.
Die vierjShrige
Posten
. .
S.
1
May8 —19,1815
MS.
5
Bb
b. Sept. 1816
Do.
MS.
Fernando
S.
1
July 1815
MS.
e. Oct. 3, 1816
Arr. PF. 4 hds. Peters, 767.
Claudine v.Villabella (Fragm.)
s.
3
July 26, 1815
MS.
6
C
e. Feb. 1818
Do.
MS.
Der Spiegelritter
Opt.
3
1815
MS.
7
E
6. Aug. 1821,
Do.
MS. (Seep. 111.)
Adrast (Fragm
\
o
1Q-IK
"ilTd
sketch
Die Freunde v.
Salamanka
s.
2
AoIO
Dec. 31, 1815
JUD.
8
Bm
b. Oct. 30, 1822
Do.
Spina, score and PF. arr.
Die Burgschaft
(Fragm.) ,
o.
3
May 1816
Allegro and An
4 hds.
Die Zwillingsbriider .
Posse
1
Jan. 1819
PF.
dante, and 9
Die Zauberharfe
Mel.
3
1820
MS.
bars Scherzo.
Sakontala (Fragm.) .
0.
3
Oct. 1820
MS.
9
?
Aug. 1825
Gastein
MS. has disappeared.
Alfonso u. Estrella.i
0.
3
Sept. 20. 1821—
Op. 69
W
C
b. March 1828
Vienna
B. & H., score and PF. arr.
Feb. 27, 1822
4 hds.
Die Verschworenen,
or Der
hSusliche Krieg
Opt.
1
Ap.1823
PF.
Fierabras
0.
3
May 25-Oct. 23,
1823
MS.
7. Pianoforte
Sonatas.
Rosamunde
. .
. .
Dr. w.
4
Dec, 23,1823
Op. 26
Key.
Date.
music
No.
Op. No. etc.
Der Graf v. Gleichen
(Sketch
in Score)
f
e
o.
3
1827
MS.
Die Salzbergwerke
(Do.) .
0.
Not
known
MS.
1
E
2 hands
Feb. 11, 1815
MS.
Der MinnesSnger
8.
Not
known
MS.
2
E
,,
Feb. 18, 1815
MS,
3
F
,,
1815
MS.
1 Revised by
inger, 1882.
Capellmeister Johann Fuchs, and published by Schles-
4
5
0
F
••
it
1816
MS.
MS.
6
Em
„
June 1817
MS.
7
B
,,
Aug. 1817
Op. 147
4-
Sacred
Works. (8.)
8
9
Am
Eb
,,
1817
it
Op. 164
Op. 163
MS.
Key.
Date,
Opus.
Publisher.
11
Ab
,,
ii
»t
MS.
12
C
,,
1818
MS.
13
F
f*
t*
MS.
Mass 1 .
F
1814
, .
.
PF.score. Augener(Prout),
14
Am
Feb. 1823
Op. 143
Novella ; Peters
15
Bb
4 hands
Mayor June, 1824
Op. 30
„ 2 . .
G
1815
, f
m
Do.
16
C
June 1824
Op. 40
,, 3 .
Bb
1815
Op. 41
Do.
17
Am
2 hands
Early 1825
Op. 42
.. 4 . .
C
1818
Op.
48
Do.
18
D
1825 (?)
Op. 53
„ 5 . .
Ab
1819-22
Do. Full score, Schreiber
19
>?
1825 (?)
Op. 120
,, 6 . .
Eb
1828
Do.Full do.K-Biedermann
20
G Fant.
M
1826
Op. 78
Bliriams-
21
Cm
M
Sept. 1828
Diabelli
siegesgesung
Mar. 1828
Op. 136
Senff, Peters, Novello.
22
A
M
,,
Do.
Lazarus,
23
Bb
M
Sept. 26, 1828
Do.
Fragm.
Feb. 1820
. .
.
Spina, Peters.
24
Em
4 hands
1828
MS.
376
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
II. Catalogue of all Schubert's works, printed and
unprinted, in the order of their composition, as
far as is ascertainable.
This attempt is compiled from the dates given
(i) in Mr. Nottebohm's Thematic Catalogue;
(2) in the 'Chronological Catalogue of all the
Songs composed by F. Schubert from iSri to
1828' in the Witteczek Collection of the Mu-
sikverein at Vienna ; (3) from my own notes
taken in the Archives of the same Collection ;
(4) from the List given by Reissmann; (5)
from occasional information in Letters ; and
(6) from all other sources available to the
compiler. The date is most usually marked by
Schubert himself upon the piece. Occasionally
it has been supplied from a letter, as in the case
of ' Einsamkeit' (No. 550) ; from inference, or
some other source ; but this is very rare. The
compositions to which no date can be affixed
are placed at the end of the Catalogue. Where
two dates are given the left-hand one is that
of beginning the piece, the right-hand one
that of ending it. ' a 3,' ' a 4' etc. = for 3, or 4,
voices. F. = female voices. M.= men's voices
( ' a 4 M. and Orch.' = for 4 men's voices with
orchestra). N. B. — All instrumental works,
and works with orchestral accompaniments,
are in italics.
Name.
Keij
Opus
No. or
Pull.
Date.
44
4£
49
5C
51
52
53
54
55
56
86
87
93
95
96
Symphony no. 1 ; Orch.
4 Menuets, PF
Gretchen im Dora (Goethe) .
Schwertlied (KOrner)
D
MS.
MS.
M8.
Reissm
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
5 Can. 6
Nov. 22
1813
It
tt
II
H
M
If
II
I*
','(?)
String quartet . «
Do. .....
C
B?
Eb
?
Do
Pliantasie, PF., 4 lids.
Auf den Sieg der Deutschen, Sop.,
2 VV. & Cello . . .
•
' Dreifach,' Terzet
' Pensa che questo,' Canzone .
•
1814. [17.]
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
130
111
112
113
114
115
116
nr
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
132
Emma (Schiller)
Lied aus der Feme (Matthisson)
Die Betende (Do.) .
Todtenopfer (Do.) .
Andenken (Do.)
Geisternfihe (Do.)
Trost an Elisa (Do.) .
Die Befreier Europas in Paris .
Mass no. 1 ; 4 Voices and Orch. .
Der Abend (Matthisson) .
Lied der Liebe (Do.)
String quartet 1 . . .
Rosalia von Mortimer (Matthn.)
An Laura (Do.) .
Der Geistertanz (Do.) .
D. MSdchen a. d. Fremde (Schill.)
Gretchen amSpinnrade (Goethe)
Des Teufels Lustschloss, Operetta
Trost in Thrflnen ....
Bb
•
A
F
Ab
C
Bb
D
D
Cm
Bb
Op. 58, a
MS.
Lf.31,1
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
GWggl
MS.
MS.
Op. 168
6L. 5
Lf. 31, 3
Lf. 31, 2
MS.
Op. 2
MS.
Lf. 25, 3
Lf.47,4
Op. 170
MS.
MS.
Lf. L'O, 2
40 L. 12
MS.
Peters,
796 no.8
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
4p.4
Ap'.'l4
April
May 16
May 17 July 22
July
M
Sep. 5 Sep. 13
Sep. 29
Oct. 7
Oct. 14
Oct. 16
Oct. 39
Oct. 22
Nov. 30
»t
November
Dec. 7
Dec. 10 Mar. 24
Dec. 12
December
1814 (?)
„(?)
„(?)
II
Name.
Kei
Opus
( No. ot Date.
Publ.
1810. [13 years old.]
1 Phantasie PP., 4 hds MS. 1810
Overture in Italian style. Orch.
Am See (Mayrhofer) . .
Symphony no. 2. Orch. . .
Gretchen im Dom (Goethe) (2)
Ammenlied (Lubi) .
Erinnerungen (Matthisson) .
Siring quartet ....
Do
1811. 114.]
2
3
1
5
6
7
Hagars Klage, Sop. & PF. .
Quintet-Overture ....
Der Vatermiirder, Sop. 4 PF. .
Eine Leichenfantasie, Sop. &PF.
Phantasie, PF., 4 hds.
String quartet ....
?
?
7
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Mar. 30
June — — July
Dec. 26
1811 (?)
f»
Do
Do
1812. [15.]
5 Menuets — Strings & 2 Horns .
6 Deutsche Do. .
8
9
10
11
12
IS
14
21
22
Overture, Orch
String quartet ....
Do
D
?
?
?
?
E
F
?
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op.] 31,3
MS.
June 26
1812
,(?)
1815. [18.]
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
1 (
at e
And
'Sep
Bardengesang, Terzet (Ossian) .
Minona (Bertrand) . . .
Die entfernte Geliebte
Als ich sie errOthen sah (Ehrlich)
Das Bild
Sonata, PF.
Do. Do
Nahe des Geliebten (Goethe) .
An Mignon (Do.) .
Die Erwartung (Schiller) .
Am Flusse (Goethe) .
SSngers Morgenlied (KSrner)
Trinklied (Castelli) .
Der Sfinger (Goethe)
Lodas Gespenst (Ossian) .
Amphiaraos (KOrner)
Sfingers Morgenlied (Do.) (2)
Mass no. 2; Voices and Orch.
String quartet . . .
Das war ich (KOrner)
Stabat mater (Lat.) i V. & Orch
Vergebliche Liebe (Bernard)
Die Sterne (Fellinger)
Jiebesrausch (Ko'rner) .
Adagio, PF
Freundschaft und Wein, Solo,
Chor. & PF.
E
E
•
Dm
a
a
Gm
•
Sm
.
, t
. '
a
MS.
MS.
MS.
Lf. 39,1
Op.165,3
MS.
MS.
Op. 5, 2
Op. 19,2
Op. 116
MS.
MS.
Op/1 31,2
Op. 117
Lf. 3
MS.
10 L. 35
Berra
Peters,7
Lf. 39, 2
MS.
Op.173.3
W L. 30
WL.29
MS.
MS.
moveme
at begi
1814'; a
)t. 13. 181
Jan. 20
Feb. 8
Feb. 10
Feb. 11
Feb. 18
Feb. 27
11
t*
• 1
II
February
M
Mar. 1
Mar. 2—^— Mar. 7
Mar. 25 -Apr. 1
Mar. 26
Ap.4
Ap.6
Ap.8
ft
Ap. 12
nt, ' 5 Sept. 1814 ' ;
nning and end of
t end of Minuut,
4.'
Quartet overture ....
Sonata, PF., V. & Va. . .
Variations. PF. ....
7 do
Klaglied
Andante, PF. ....
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
",
1813. [16.]
TodtengrSberlied (HSlty)
Do. (Do.) a3 .
Die Schatten (Matthisson)
Sehnsucht (Schiller)
'TJnendliche,' Terzet (Schiller)
'Voruber,' Do. (Do.) .
'Unendliche,' Canon, (Do.).
'Hierstrechet,' Terzet (Do.).
' Dessen Fahne,' Do. (Do.) .
Verklflrung (Pope) .
'Bin jugendlicher,' Canon.
'Hier umarmen,' Terzet (Schill.)
'Thronend,' Do. (Do.)
' Majestatsche,' Do. (Do.)
'Frisch athmet,' Do. (Do.)
'Dreifach,' Canon
Die 2 Tugendwegen, Terzet
Thekla.e.Geisterstimme (Schill.)
•
MS.
MS.
MS.
6 L.I
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Lf . 17, 4
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
6L.2
Lf. 45, 2
Lf.13
MS.
Jan. 19
l»
Ap. 12
Ap. 15— — Ap. 17
Ap. 15
Ap. 18
Ap. 19
Ap. 29
May
May 4
May 8
Do.
May 9
May 10
May 15
JulyS
July 15
Aug. 22 Aug. 23
Aug. 29
Sept. 13— Aug. 1814
Sept. 27
)n the autograph, at beginning of 1st
nd of do., 'Completed in 4^ hours';
ante, 'Sept. 6, 18H' and 'Sept. 10,
1. 11, 1814'; and at end of Finale, ' Sei
DerTaucher (Schiller) .
Cantata, father's birthday (F.S.),
dSM. and Guitar .
SCHUBEET.
SCHUBERT.
377
Name.
Key
Opus
No. or
Publ.
Date.
Name.
Key
Opus
No. or
Publ.
Date.
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
188
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
2QU
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
23!'
240
241
242
Die erste liebe (Fellinger)
Der vierjtihrige Posten (Operetta)
Amalia (Schiller)
0
Lf. 35, 1
MS.
Op.173,1
MS.
Op.172,3
Lf. 50, 1
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
40L.11
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op.111,1
MS.
Lf.30,2
MS.
MS.
Op.172,1
Op.172,2
Op. 3, a
Lf. 2, 2
Lf. 42, 4
Lf . 42, 2
MS.
MS.
Op. 5. 4
Op. 47
MS.
MS.
Op.165,4
Op.108,3
Op.172,4
Op.112,3
Op.118,1
Op.118,3
MS.
MS.
40 L. 10
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op. 38
MS.
Op.118,2
MS.
Lf.47,3
MS.
40L.2S
Op. 87, 2
MS.
Op.118,6
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op.115,2
Lf. 47, 2
Lf. 45, 4
Lf. 42, 3
MS.
BIS.
MS.
Op.118,5
MS.
9 Ges. 2
9 Ges. 4
40 L. 9
Lf. 44, 4
Lf. 48, 7
Ap. 12
Mfl IT 1 fi
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
32G
S'W
Der Mutter Erde ....
An den Friihling (see no. 253) .
Die FrOhlichkeit ....
Am
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Lf. 28, 5
MS.
MS.
MS.
Lf. 10, 1
Op.172,5
Lf. 4, 1
MS.
Lf. 4, 3
Lf. 28, 2
Lf. 28, 3
MS.
MS.
Lf. 36, 2
MS.
40 L. 8
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Lf. 37, 2
Op. 58, 1
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op. 141
MS.
9G. 5
MS.
MS.
Op. 1
Op. 3, 3
Op. 3, 1
MS.
Op. 4, 3
Op. 5, 1
Op. 5, 3
Lf. 37, 2
40 L. 14
Lf. 47, 5
6L. 3
Op. 58, 3
Op. 39
Lf. 6
Op. 87, 3
MS.
Op. 57, 3
MS.
Op. 150
Lf. 41, 1
August
ii
Sept. 6
Sept. 14
II
II
Sept. 15
Sept. 16
Sept. 20
Sept. 27
September
»
ii
Oct. 3
Oct. 12
Oct. 15
if
II
•v
IP
ff
if
Oct. 18
Oct. 19
Oct. 19
I*
If
*l
If
»•
Oct. 23
October
Nov. 9
Nov. 11—
Dec. 15
Dec. 28
., (?)
Dec. 31
1815
ft
ft
II
tl
II
»3
ft
II
IV
tt
It
II
II
II
M
«•
VI
»»
It
IV
tv
It
ft
I*
»»
tf
)•
f*
. »»
May 19
May 22
May 24
May 24 July 19
May 26
fi
1»
II
May 29
May
., (?)
June 3
June 5
June 16
June 17
ii
June 21
June 22
June 24
June 25
Tnlv
Es 1st so angenehm .
Lied improvised for a play
Die friihen Gr&ber
Die Sommernacht . . .
Am
An die Nachtigall (Do.) .
An die Apfelbaume, etc. (Do.)
Mailied, ' Griiner wird,' k 2 (Do.)
Do. Do. B.S.B. (Do.)
Symphony no. 3. Orch.
Mailied, ' Der Schnee,' & 2 (HOlty)
Do. Do. Canon k 3 (Do.)
Liebestfindelel (Korner) .
Jfigerlied (Do.)
Lutzow's wilde Jagd (Do.)
Der Morgenstern (Do.)
DerLiebende (HOlty)
An die Freude (Schiller) .
Das Geheimniss ....
D
Dem Uuendlichen (Klopstock)
An den Fruhllng (Schiller) .
Shilric und Vinvela (Qssian) .
Cantata for father's birthday, d
•
Das Mfldchen von Inistore
Selma und Selmar (Klopstock)
Das Rosenband (Do.)
'Feme von d. grossen Stadt'
(Pichler) ....
•
ClS.rcb.ens Lied (Goethe) .
Adelwold u. Emma (Bertrand)
Die Nonne (HOlty) .
DerTraum (Do.)
Die Laube (Do.)
Meeres-Stille (Goethe)
Kolmas Klage (Ossian) .
Grablied (Kenner) .
Das Finden (Kosegarten)
Fernando. Singspiel . .
Lieb Minna (Stadler)
Erster Verlust (Goethe) .
Salve Regina, Sop. & Orch.
tdens Nachtgesang (Kosegarten)
Von Ida (Do.)
Die Tfiuschung (Do.)
Erlnnerung (Do.)
Das Sehnen (Do.)
An dem Unendlichen (Schiller)
a4M
Geist der Liebe (Kosegarten) .
Tischlied (Goethe) .
Das Abendroth, (Kosegarten)
Terzet . . : .
Abends unter d. Linde (Do.) .
Do. (Do.) .
Die Mondnacht (Do.) .
Claudine von Villa Bella. Sing-
spiel (Goethe)
Huldigung (Kosegarten)
Alles um Liebe (Do.) .
Uer Liedler (Kenner)
Sehnsucht der Liebe (Ko'rner)
Der Abend (Kosegarten).
Die Schlacht (fragment) .
Der Rattenfanger (Goethe) .
Bundeslied (Do.) .
Das Geheimniss (Schiller)
Die Hoffnung (Do.) .
Das Madchen aus d. Fremde (Do.)
Die Spinnerin (Goethe) .
Der Gott und die Bajadere (Do.)
PunschHed im Norden z. singen
(Schiller) .
ft
•
G
F
•
Lambertine (Stoll) .
Labetrank der Liebe (Do.)
Das gestOrte Gliick (Korner) .
Skolie (Reinhardtstein) .
An die Geliebte (Stoll) .
Wiegenlied (3) (KOrner) .
Gruss an den Mai (Ermln)
Die Sternenwelten (Fellinger)
Die Macht der Liebe (Kalchberg)
Mignons Gesang (Sehnsucht) .
Hektors Abschied (Schiller) .
Die Sterne (Kosegarten) .
Nachtgesang (Do.)
Schwangesang (Do.)
Luisens Antwort (Do.)
An Rosa (• Warum ') (Do.)
An Rosa ('Rosa') (Do.)
Idens Schwanenlied (Do.)
Der Zufriedene (Reissig) .
Liane (Mayrhofer)
Klage der Ceres (Schiller)
Mass no. 3 ; 4 V. & Orch. .
Das gestOrte Gliick k ,
Das Grab (Salis) a 4 . _ .
Bb
July 2
July 5
July 7
» »
II
July 8
July 11 (?)
July 15
it
July 20
July 24
July 25
• »
July 26
July 27
July
if
• ,
Aug. 1
Aug. 4
Aug. 7
Aug. 12
Aug. 18
Aug. 19
Aug. 20
Aug. 21
Aug. 22
Aug. 23
Aug. 24
Aug. 25
it
ti
it
fi
i,
Aug. 28
Aug. 29
August
Die Freunde von Salamanka,
ErlkOnig (Goethe) .
HeidenrSslein (Do.)
SchSfers Klagelied (Do.) .
Geistesgruss (Do.)
Wanderers Nachtlled (Do.)
Rastlose Liebe (Do.)
Der Fischer (Do.) .
Sehnsucht (Do.) .
Hoffnung (Do.) .
An den Mond (Do.) .
An die Entfernte (Do.) .
Des Mfidchens Klage (Schiller)
Sehnsucht (Do.) .
Elysium (Do.)
D. Jungling a. Bache (Do.) .
Trost in Thr&nen . . .
An den Mond (HOlty)
Do. (Do.) .
Bened ictus es, 4 V. & Orch.
Nachtgesang (Collin)
C
Der SchatzgrSber (Goethe) .
Wonne der Wehmuth (Do.) .
Wer kauft Liebesgotter ? (Do.)
Der Morgenkuss (Baumberg) .
Cora an die Sonne (Do.)
Abendst&ndchen, an Lina (Do.)
C
Adelaide (Matthisson)
Lf. 42, 5
Hermann und Thusnelda (Klop
stock) ....
Lf. 28, 1
Lilla an die MorgenrOthe .
An die Sonne (Baumberg)
Der Weiberfreund
Trinklied, a 4 M. & PF. . .
Bergknappenlied, a 4 M. & PF.
•
Klage um Aly Bey (Claudius) .
Trinklied vor d. Schlacht Chor.
Gebet wShrend d. Schlacht
(KOrner) . t
•
Lf. 45, 3
MS.
Lf. 10, 7
Op.109,2
Lf. 4, 2
MS.
MS.
Lf. 49, 2
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Geniigsamkeit (Schober) .
Lied n. d. Falle Nathos (Ossian)
•
DasLeben (Wannovius) .
Tischlerlied
•
Todtenkranz fur ein Kind
Abendlled ' Gross u. roth ' .
Punschlied, Terzet
Lob des Tokayers (Baumberg)
DieSpinnerin (Goethe) .
Die Biirgschaft
•
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op.118.4
Op.118.6
Lf.8
Die fruhen Gn'iber
Auf einem Kirchhof (Schlechta)
Sonata, PF
F
C
Do. Do. ...
Adrast — Opera
Der Smeoe.lriH.fr flnf.rrltn
378
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
Name.
Key
Opus
No. or
Publ.
Date.
1816. [19 years old.]
32i
Klage
40 L. 21
January
32<
An die Natur (Stolberg) .
.
MS.
Feb. 15
SS
Salve Regina, 4 V. & Orch.
F
Hasl.
Feb. 21
33
Stabat Mater (Germ.) a 44 Orch
Fm
MS.
Feb. 28
33
Der Tod Oskars (Ossian) .
.
Lf. 5
February
33,
Lf. 19,
Mar. 13
33
Herbstabend (Salif) .
(
MS.
Mar. 24
S3.
Ins stille Land (Do.) .
.
Lf. 39,
Mar. 27
S3
Op. 92,
March
33
Die Schlacht (Schiller) (2)
.
MS.
it
S&
Lebensmelodien (A. Schlegel).
.
Op.111,
it
S&
Die vier Weltalter (Schiller) .
.
Op.lll,
,,
S4C
Des Madchen's Klage (Do.) (2)
,
Reissm
,,
34
Die Entziickung, an Laura (Dov
0
MS.
»i
34
Pfliigerlied (Salis)
.
MS.
M
34
Die Wehmuth (Do.)
B
MS.
M
9U
Gesang a. d. Harmonle (Do.)
.
MS.
f,
34
40 L. 36
84
Laura am Klavier
.
MS.
ft
ft
34
Stimme der Liebe (HOlty)
o
MS.
Apr. 29
34
Julius an Theone
.
MS.
Apr. 30
34
Symphony no. 4 (Tragische). Orch
Cm
MS.i
April
35(
Stimme der Hebe (Stolberg) .
.
Lf. 29,
ft
35
MS.
35
Sprache der Liebe
Op.115,
M
85
Die verfehlte Stunde .
.
40 L. 26
n
854
Entziickung,' Tag voll Himmel '
.
MS.
Iff
SE
Die Herbstnacht (Salis) .
!
MS.
M
S5«
Abschied von der Harfe (Do.)
MS.
It
35
Daphne am Bache
g
MS.
tf
35
Klage an den Mond (H8Hy) .
(
Lf. 48, 3
May 12
85
Minnelled (Do.) .
.
MS.
,,
36
Winterlied (Do.) .
(
MS.
May 13
36
Friihltngslied (Do.) .
6
MS.
|§
86
Mignons Gesang, • Kennst du ' .
m
Lf . 20, 3
May
86
Die fruhe Liebe (HOlty) .
B
MS.
>t
864
Blumenlied (Do.) .
m
MS.
p*
86
Seligkeit (Do.) .
B
MS.
i>
36
Erndtelied (Do.) .
Lf. 48, 2
867
Stimme der Liebe (Do.) (2)
MS.
•»
tt
86
Trlnklied im Mai (Do.), a 3 M.
Eb
MS.
tt
36
Naturgenuss (Matthisson)
.
MS.
.,(?)
37
Do. (Do.), a4M..
Bb
Op. 16, 2
371
DerLeidende (Do.)
D
Lf. 1, 2
t*
37
Erinnerungen, Terzet (Do.) .
MS.
37
Andenken Do. (Do.) .
.
MS.
tt
374
Die BUrgschaft, opera (unf.) .
t
MS.
375
5 Ecossaisea, PF. ....
.
MS.
tt
380
1 Ecossaise, PF. ....
B
Op. 18, 5
881
Prometheus, Canlate . ,
MS.
June 16
882
Fragment aus d. 2Eschylos
Lf. 14, 2
June
883
Gott Im Friihlinge (Uz) .
MS.
M
384
DerguteHirt (Do.) .
40 L. 7
385
Die Liebesgfltter (Do.) .
MS.
386
An den Schlaf
MS.
887
)ie Gestirne (Klopstock)
Lf. 10, 2
888
Das grosse Halleluja (Do.) .
Lf. 41, 2
889
Schlachtlied, a 3 (Do.)
E
MS.
390
Edone (Do.) .
F
Lf. 28, 4
891
An die Sonne, a 4 and PF. O7z) .
Ges. 6
892
Cantata for Salierfs Jubilee (F.S.)
MS.
tt
898
OhorderEngel (Faust) .
Cm
Friese
894
Jondofor Violin and Strings .
A
MS.
895
Aus • Diego Manzanares '
(Schlechta) ....
OL. 25
July 30
896
Freude der Kmderjahre .
MS.
July
397
Grablied a.e. Soldaten (Schubart)
40 L. 6
398
Das Heimweh (Hell) .
„
MS.
399
leqaiem (fragment) .
Eb
MS.
.'.' (?)
400
!n der Mitternacht (Jacobi) .
.
MS.
August
401
Hochzeitlied (Do.)
•
MS.
402
An Chloen (Do.)
MS.
403
rauer der Liebe (Do.)
.
MS.
404
Die Perle (Do.)
.
K> L. 31
tt
405
''antum ergo, 4 V. & Orch.
c
MS.
August
406
antata (to his father)
.
MS.
Sept. 27 (?)
407
GesSngedesHarfners (Goethe)
.
Op. 12
September
410
rpheus (Jacobi)
,
f. 19, 1
411
iedesend (Mayrhofer) .
.
f. 23, 2
tt
i Except the Andante.
Opus
Name.
Kei
i No, or
Date.
Publ.
41.
Abschied, or Lenz (Mayrhofer)
t
MS.
September
41.
Alte Liebe (Do.)
m
MS.
M
414
Mignons Gesang (Sehnsucht) .
.
40 L.I
41E
1L3.
41£
Magnificat, 4V.& Orch. . ,
0
MS.
t*
tt
417
Def SSnger auf dem Felsen
.
MS.
tt
41?
Overture, Orch. ....
Rb
MS.
419
Cantata for Spendou, V. & Orch.
J-> I/
Gm
Op. 128
**
42C
T{U
MQ
O * f\ A o
421
Der Hirt (Mayrhofer)
-D C/
•
JXM.Ot
MS.
toept. Oct. 3
Oct. 8
422
Geheimniss.an F.Schubert (Do.)
MS.
October
423
Zum Punsche (Do.)
.
Lf . 44, C
424
Hermann u. Thusnelda (Klop-
stock)
.
Lf. 28, 1
425
Der Wanderer (Schmidt).
Op. 4, 1
426
Adagio and Rondo, PF. * Strings
F
Witznd
tt
427
' Auguste jam ccelestium,' Duet,
8. A. with Orch. .
MS.
428
Am Grabe Anselmos (Claudius)
Op. 6, 3
Nov. 4
429
An die Nachtigall (Do.) .
•
Op. 98,1
November
430
Wiegenlied (Do.) .
.
Op. 98, 2
f i
431
Bei d. Grabe m. Vaters (Do.) .
,
MS.
432
Die Zufriedenheit (Do.) .
t
MS.
433
Phidile (Do.) .
.
MS.
tt
434
Abendlied, ' Der Mond ' (Do.) .
B
MS.
tt
435
Der Geistertanz (Matthisson),
a 4 M
1 1
Gotth.
436
Herbstlied (Salis)
40 L. 24
tt
437
Abendlied d.Furstin (Mayrhofer)
6L. 6
438
Skolie (Matthisson) .
.
MS.
December
439
Lebenslied (Schober) .
.
Lf. 38, 2
M
440
Jfigers Abendlied (Goethe) .
.
Op. 3, 4
1816
441
Der KOnig in Thule (Do.)
.
Op. 5, 5
tt
442
An Schwager Kronos (Do.)
.
Op. 19,1
443
Lied eines Schiffers (Mayrhofer)
•
Op. 65, 1
tt
444
Alinde (Rochlitz)
Op. 81,1
tt
445
An die Laute (Do.) .
.
Op. 81, 2
446
Zur guten Nacht (Do.) .
Op. 81, 3
ti
447
An eine Quelle (Claudius)
m
Op.109,3
448
Die Nacht (Uz) ....
Lf . 44, 2
c>\
449
Trinklied (' Funkelnd '), T., 4 M.
tt \-j
and PF. .
D
Mech.
450
Am Bach im Fruhling (Schober)
Op.109,1
"
451
Cronnan (Ossian)
m
Lf . 2, 1
H
452
Concerto, Violin and Orch. .
D
MS.
n
453
String Quartet ....
F
MS.
454
7
TVT<5
455
Menuet, PF
?
JUOi
MS.
"
456
Sonatina, PF. and V. . .
D
Op.137,1
M
457
Do. Do.
Am
Op.137,2
If
458
Do. Do.
Gm
Op.137,3
tt
459
Augenlied (Mayrhofer) .
Lf. 50, 2
1817. [20.]
460
Der AlpenjSger (Mayrhofer) .
.
Op. 13, 3
January
461
Schlummerlied (Do.)
.
Op. 24, 2
ff
462
Wie Ulfru fischt (Do.)
.
Op. 20, 3
M
463
Fahrt zum Hades (Do.)
.
Lf. 18, 3
f i
464
Die Liebe (Leon) . .
.
MS.
t>
465
Lf. 45, 1
466
Jagdlied (Werner) . .
•
MS.
M
It
467
Klage
MS.
468
Trost, ' Nimmer lange '
•
MS.
469
La pastoreila (Goldoni) .
.
40 L. 19
,,
470
Schiffers Scbeidelied (Schober)
,
Lf. 24, 1
February
471
Die Nacht (Ossian) .
,
Lf.l
f f
472
Memnon (Mayrhofer) .
•
Op. 6, 1
March
473
Antigone und O2dip (Do.)
.
Op. 6, 2
t.
474
Am Strome (Do.)
.
Op. 8, 4
,,
475
Philoktet (Do.)
.
Op. 11, 3
i>
476
An die Musik (Schober) .
.
Op. 88, 4
I*
477
Auf dem See (Goethe)
.
Op. 92, 2
i>
478
Ganymed (Do.)
.
Op. 19, 3
it
470
Der JQngling u. d. Tod (Spaun)
JO L. 18
if
480
Die Etesiedelei (Salis)
f,f. 38, 1
,.(?)
481
Am See (Bruchmann)
Lf. 9, 2
M
482
Hfinflings Liebeswerbung (Kind)
.
Op. 20, 3
April
4.93
Pax vobiscum (Schober) .
Lf. 10. 6
M
484
Uraniens Flucht (Mayrhofer) .
.
MS.
|f
485
Auf der Donau (Do.)
,
Dp. 21,1
lf
4-r,
An d.unterg. Sonne (Kosegarten)
,
Op. 44
May
487
Gretchen'sBitte (Goethe), fragm.
Lf. 29, S
ff
488
Die Einsiedelei (Salis) .
,
MS.
„
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
379
Name.
Key
Opus
No. or
Publ.
Date.
Name.
Key
Opus
No. or
Publ.
Date.
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
600
601
602
EOS
604
605
506
607
508
609
610
611
612
613
614
515
616
617
618
619
520
521
522
523
524
625
626
527
528
Fischerlied (Salis) .
Do. (Do.), a, 4 M.
Nach eln. Gewitter (Mayrhofer) .
Overture — Orch. ....
T>
Em
CS">
F
MS.
MS.
40 L. 5
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op. 98, 3
MS.
9G., 3
Lf. 29, 4
MS.
Op. 147
Op. 162
Spina
Op. 8, 3
Op. 24,1
MS.
Op. 37, 2
Op. 110
MS.
Op. 88, 2
Op. 170
MS.
Op. IS, 1
MS.
Op. 13, 2
MS.
Op. 32
MS.
4L. 3
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS
Op. 164
Op. 145
Gotth.
ii
ii
May
June
July
Aug. 24
August
September
i»
ii
October
Oct. Feb. 1818
November
it
•i
1817
"(?)
r*
M
if
99
99
99
ft
Iff
It
99
.,(?)
i»
ii
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
682
683
584
693
894
595
596
597
59R
599
Hymne 1 (Novalis) .
Hymne 2 (Do.) . . .
Hymne 3 (Do.) . .
Hymne 4 (Do.)
Der Friihlingsmorgen, Cantata,
STB&PF
Belm Winde (Mayrhofer) .
Trost (Do.) .
Die SternennSchte (Do.) .
NachtstUck (Do.) .
Prometheus (Goethe) .
Die Liebende schrelbt (Do.) .
•
•
•
•
0
C#m
•
•
40 L. 37
40 L. 38
40 L. 39
40 L. 40
Op. 158
Lf. 22, 3
Lf. 44, 1
Op.165,2
Op. 36, 2
Lf. 47. 1
Op.165,1
Op. 9.
No. 5-13
Op. 153
Schreib.
Op. 158
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op. 114
May
1*
August
October
ii
»i
Nov. 12
November
Nov. Sept. 1822
1819
If
tt
It
ft
Das Grab (Salis) (S), 4 M. & PF.
Iphigenia (Mayrhofer)
Furcht d. Geliebten (Klopstock)
Lied im Freien (Salis), a 4 M. .
Abschied; 1n e.Stammbuch (F.S.)
Die Entziickung, An Laura
(Schiller) (2) .
Sonata, PF. .....
Sonata. PF. & V. ...
Variations, PP., on a theme of
A. Hiittenbrenner'a . .
Erlafsee (Mayrhofer).
Gruppe aus dem Tartarus
(Schiller) ....
B
A
Am
Salve Beffina, Sop. & Strings
Mass no. 5, Voices & Orch. .
Cantata in honour of Vogl
(Stadler) ....
A
Ab
Eomanze aus d. Zauberharfe .
Many Ecossaises & Waltzes
Im traulichen Kreise, a 4 .
Quintet, PF. etc
A
Overture in Italian style, Orch. .
Der Alpenjager (Schiller)
Der Kampf (Do.) .
Symphony no. 6 ...
D
•
0
CJJm
0
•
o
Thekla. eine Geisterstimme
(Schiller) ....
Overture in Italian style, no. 2 .
Lied elnes Kindes (fragment) .
DerSchSferu.d.Beiter (Fouqu^)
Geist der Liebe (Matthisson) .
Lob der Thrfinen (A. Schlegel)
1 Briider, schrecklich brennt die
Thrflne' ....
1820. [23.]
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
Nachthymne (Novalis)
•
40 L. 4
5 Can. 1
5 Can. 2
5 Can. 3
6 Can. 4
Spina
Lf. 7, S
40 L. 22
40 L. 27
Op.172,6
Lf. 33, 1
January
•*
February
March
»»
May
September
it
ii
October
November
Dec. 23
December
»»
1820
If
Lazarus, Voices & Orch. . .
AbendrOthe (F. Schlegel).
DerKnabe (Do.)
DerFluss (Do.)
DieVOgel (Do.)
•
DieForelle (Schubart) .
Der Strom (fragment) .
Trost im Liede (Schober) .
Gesangd. Geister (Goethe), a 4 M.
String Trio
?
?
Fm
Ab
Am
E
Bb
Db
»
Ab
Op. 18, 6
Lf. 11, 1
Lf. 11, 2
Orest auf Tauris (Mayrhofer)
Polonaises for Violin . . .
Sonata, PF
Do. Do
FreiwilligesVersinken (Do.)
Liebeslauschen (Schlechta) .
Sakontala, Opera, fragment
Der Jungling a. d. Hiigel (H.
Huttenbrenner) .
Psalm xxiii. 4 F. & PF. .
Waldesnacht (F. Schlegel) .
Der ziimenden Diana (Mayr-
A$
Cm
Lf. 11, 4
Lf . 15, 2
MS.
Op. 8, 1
Op. 132
Lf. 16
Op. 36,1
Senff
T f AQ 1
Do. Do
Adagio & Rondo, PF. . .
Scherzo, PF.
Do. Do
12 Deutsche Tame, &5Ecossaises,
PF.
1818. [21 years old.]
String Quartet ....
545
646
617
648
549
550
551
552
653
654
555
555
557
558
559
660
Lebenslust, a 4, & PF. .
Auf. d. Riesenkoppe (KSrner) .
An d. Mond in a, Herbstnacht
(Schreiber) ....
D.
9 G., 7
Lf. 49, 1
Lf. 18, 2
Lf. 30, 3
Op. 48
Lf. 32
Lf. 10, 3
Lf. 21, 1
Lf. 10, 5
January
March
April
June
July
„(?) '
August
ii
11
September
November
Ft
It
December
Phantasie. PF
Variations on a French air
C
Em
Op. 15
Op. 10
1821. [24.]
Grablied fiir die Mutter
Mats in C (see no. 883)
Einsamkeit (Mayrhofer) .
Das Marienhild (Schreiber) .
Der Blumenbrief (Do.)
Litaney (Jacobf)
•
625
626
627
628
629
630
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
Der Ungluckliche (Pichler) .
Die gefangenen SSnger (A.
•
Op. 87.1
Lf. 33, 2
Lf. 38, 3
Lf. 14, 1
Op. 167
Op.9,32-
36; op.
18,2
Op. 14, 2
MS.
DiabelH
MS.
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op.9,29,
30, 31 ;
Opl8,l,3>
Op.173,4
MS.
MS.
Op. 14.1
Op. 31
Op. 20,1
Lf. SP, 1
January
9t
February
If
Mar. 8
March
i»
April
„ (June?)
»»
July
August
September
Sept. 20
Oct. 20
1821
M
ft
Versunken (Goethe)
Grenzen d. Menscbheit (Do.) .
Qesang der Geisler (Do.) .
d 8 M . 4 Strings . . .
•
Blondel zu Marien (Grlllparzer)
Sonnet after Dante by A. Schle
gel. 1. 'Apollo' .
Sonnet, Do. 2. 'Allem/ .
Das Abendroth ....
Sonnet after Dante by A. Schle
gel. 3. •Nunmehr*
Blanka (F. Schlegel) .
VomMitleiden MariS (Schlegel)
.
Lf. 34, 2
MS.
MS.
Op.173,6
MS.
MS.
Lf. 10, 4
Geheimes (Goethe)
Mahomet's Gesang (Do.) .
Variation on Diabelli's Waltz .
Linde Lufte, Duet, S. & T. .
Johanna Sebus (fragm.) (Goethe)
Aria, ' Der Tag entflieht ' (Zau-
berglOckehen)
Duet, 'Nein, das 1st zuviel (Do.)
5 Deutsche Tlinze ....
Symphony no. 7 (sketch), Orch. .
DerBlumenSchmerz (Maylath)
Alfonso und Estrella, Act 1 .
Alfonso und Estrella, Act 2 .
Suleika, 1 (Goethe) . . .
Suleika, 2 (Do.)
•
Cm
£
1819. [22.]
561
562
563
664
565
666
667
668
559
570
671
572
Did Zvnllingseruder — Operetta .
•
Peters
Jan. 19
January
February
i>
ii
March
April
,i
ii
Der Wanderer (F. Schlegel) .
Abendbilder
•
Op. 65, 2
Lf. 9, 3
Lf. 10, 8
Lf. 40, 1
Lf. 40, 2
MS.
Lf . 40, 3
MS.
Spina
Gotth.
Himmelsfunken (Silbert)
DasMSdchen (F. Schlegel) .
Berthas Lied hi d. Nacht (Grlll
parzer)
Overture, Orch
An die Freunde (Mayrhofer) .
D. Jiingllng a. Bache (Schiller)
Sehnsucht (Goethe), a 5 M. .
Kuhe, schOnstes Gliick, a 4 M. .
A
Em
Em
Am
E
0
Sey mir gegriisst (Ruckert) .
•
Lob der Thraneu (A. Schlegel)
Die Nachtigall (Unger), a 4 M .
•
Op. 13, 2
Op. 11, 2
380
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
Name.
Key
Opus
No. or
Publ.
Date.
Name.
Zej,
Opus
> No. or
Publ.
Dale.
1822. [25 years old.]
73E
73e
737
String Quartet ....
Divertissement d I'hongroise,
PF., 4 hands ....
Overture, PF., 4 hands
Am
Gm
F
Op. 29
Op. 54
Op. 34
1824 (?)
657
65i
65S
66C
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
' fipistel von M. von Collin .
! GeistderLiebe (Matthisson), a 4
Alfonso und Estrella, Act 3
Nachtviolen (Mayrhofer) .
Heliopolis (Do.)
GottinderNatur (Gleim),a4F.
•
Lf. 46
Op. 11, £
MS.
40 L. 2(
Lf. 37, 1
Op. 133
Op.lOV
January
„
Feb. 27
April
It
August
September
Ront
1825. [28.]
73&
73£
74C
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
Des SSngers Habe . .
Die junge Nonne (Craigher) .
Der Einsame (Lappe) .
Im Walde (Schulze) . . .
'Soldier, rest' (W.Scott)
'Huntsman, rest' (Do.) .
'Hall to the Chief (Do.), a 4 M.
•He is gone' (Do.). a4F.
•The heath* (Do.) . .
'Ave Maria* (Do.) .
'My hawk is tired' (Do.) .
Todtengrfibers Heimweh . .
•
Lf. 7, 1
Op. 43, ]
Op. 41
Op. 93,1
Op. 52,1
Op. 52, 'i
Op. 52, 2
Op. 52, 4
Op. 52, 5
Op. 52, 6
Op. 52, 7
Lf . 24, 2
February
(?)
March (?)
',', (?)
., (?)
Ap.4
April
(?)
I,
August
September
December
„ (?)
1825
ti
II
II
It
Mass in A\> completed . .
Symphony no. 8 (unfinished) Orch.
Des Tages Weihe, a 4 with PF. .
Willkommen und Abschied
(Goethe)
Bm
*
Schreib
Spina
Op. 146
Op. 56,1
40 L. 3
6L. 4
Op. 92
Op. 68
Op. 73
Op. 65, 3
Oct.
Nov. 22
December
1822
it
Am Flusse (Do.) .
An die Entfernte (Do.) .
Der Musensohn (Do.) . .
Der Wacbtelschlag (Sauter) .
Die Rose (F. Schlegel)
[Aus Heliopolis (Mayrhofer) .
•
Der blinde Knabe (Craigher) .
Sonata, PF., unfinished
Fiille der Liebe (F. Schlegel) .
AufderBriicke (Schultze) .
Das Heimweh (Pyrker) . .
Die Allmacht (Do.) . .
Symphony no. 9, Orchestra .
2 Scenes fr. " Lacrimas' (Schutz)
Abendlied f. d. Entfernte (A.
C
•
Op. 101
Whistl.
Lf. 25, 1
Op. 93, 2
Op. 79,1
Op. 79, a
MS,
Op. 124
Op. 88,1
Lf. 13, 1
Lf. 13, 2
Op. 55
Op. 42
Op. 53
Op. 120
Op. 126
MS.
672
67S
674
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
1823. [26.]
Salve Regina (no.W<t),orchestrated
F
Bm
Op. 47
Op. S3, 2
MS.
Lf. 9, 1
Op. 143
Op. 123
Op.173,2
Lf. 18, 1
Spina
MS.
Lf. 21, 2
Spina
Op. 33, 1
4 172, 2
MS.
MS.
MS.
Op.25,15
Op. 22, 1
Op. 59, 3
Op. 71
Op. 72
Op. 25,
1-14,
16-20
Op. 39, 2
Op. 59, 4
Op. 26
Jan. 28
Januari
February
March
April
A riril
Der zilrnendeBarde(Bruchmann)
Sonata, PF
Am
Viola (Schober) ....
Das Geheimniss (Schiller) (2) .
Pilgerweise (Schober)
Die Verschworenen (Operetta) .
Fierabras (Opera), Act 1 .
Vergissmeinnicht (Schober)
Rudigers Heimkehr. T. & Ohor.
•
An meln Herz (Schulze) .
Der liebliche Stern (Do.)
Trauer Marsch (Emp. Alex.),
•
May 25 May 31
May
June 5
June 19
—Oct. 2
October
1S23
f 1
May? — — Oct.?
Dec. (?)
Sonata, PF
Do. . ,
Am
D
A
2 Deutsche Tame ....
Fierabras, Act 2 ...
Der Schiffer (Schlegel)
Fierabras, Act 3 ...
Eifersucht und Stolz (Mailer) .
Der Zwerg .....
A
Do
Ein FrSulein schaut (Kenner)
1826. [29.]
768
769
770
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
7:-:;
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
Tiefes Leid (Schulze) .
String Quartet ....
Galopp and 8 Ecossaises, PF.
Romanze d. Richard LOwen-
herz (W. Scott) .
Urn Mitternacht (Schulze)
TTeber Wildemann (Do.) .
Lebensmuth (Do.) .
Im FrtthHng (Do.) .
FischerweJse (Schlechta) .
Am Fenster (Seidl)
Der Wanderer an d.Mond (Do.)
Das ZiigenglOcklein (Do.)
Im Freien (Do.)
Sehnsucht (Do.)
String Quartet ....
An Sylvia (Shakspeare)
StSndchen, 'Hark! hark!' (Do.)
Trlnklied, 'Bacchus!' (Do.)
Hippolits Lied (Schopenhauer)
Grab und Mond (Seidl), a 4 M.
Nachthelle (Seidl), J..4M..&PF.
Sonata (Fantaisie), PF. . .
Marche heroique, PF., 4 hands .
Rondeau (brillantc), PF. & V. .
Deutsche Messe, d 4 with Wind .
Dm
6
Bm
F
Lf. SO, 1
Witzen
Op. 49
Op. 86
Op. 88. 3
Op,108.1
Lf. 17, 1
Lf. 25, 2
Op. 96, 4
Op.105,3
Op. 80,1
Op. 80, 2
Op. 80, 3
Op.105,4
Op. 161
Op.106,4
Lf. 7, 4
Lf. 48, 4
Lf. 7, 2
Hasl.
Op. 134
Op. 78
Op. 66
Op. 70
Gotth.
January
March
ti
tt
,',' (?)
„(?)
„ (?)
June 20— June 30
July
PI
,,
a
September
October
1826
Du bist die Ruh .
Drang in die Feme (Leitner) .
Aufdem Wasser (Barcarolle) .
Die schtoe Miillerin (Aluller) .
Dass sie hier gewesen ! (Ruckert)
Lachen und Weinen (Do.) .
Rosamunde muiic (Chezy)
•
1S24. [27.]
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
Introd. & Variations, PF. & Flute
Octet
Em
F
0
0
Ab
Bb
Eb
0
Eb
Ab
Cm
0
D
0
A
im
i. ii\
k-iii
D
bm
Op. 160
Op. 166
Lf. 20, 1
Lf. 22, 1
Lf. 22, 4
Lf. 34, 1
40 L. 2
Op. 28
Op. 149
Op. 140
Op. 35
Op. 30
Op. 33, 8
Op. 33, 9
Gott. 17
Gott. 18
Sott. 19
Gott. 20
Op. S3, 2
Dp.33,12
3otth.2
Sotth.3
3otth.4
Jotth.5
iotth.8
Jott. 12
)p.l39a
,f. 35, 2
)p. 8, 2
January
Im Abendroth (Lappe) .
Der Sieg (Mayrhofer)
Abendstern (Do.)
AuflOsung (Do.) .
Der Gondelfahrer (Do.) .
Do. (Do.), a 4 M.
Salve Regina. a 4 M. .
Sonata, PF., 4 hds. (' Grand Duo ')
Variations, PF.,± hands .
Sonata, PF., 4 hands .
Waltz, PF., 4 hands .
Do. Do
L&ndler, PF., 4 hands
Do. Do. .
Do. Do. . . '.
Do. Do
Waltz, PF., 2 hands . .
Do. Do
LSndler, PF., 2 hands
Do. Do. ....
Do. Do
Do, Do
Do. Do
Do. Do
Jebet (' Du Urquell,' Fouque"),
a 4 with PF
March
VI
If
April
June
1 Middle of 1824 '
June (?)
July
it
,,
ii
September
Dec. 31
1824
1827. [SO.]
801
802
803
804
805
806 '
818 .
819 ]
820 J
821 ]
822 5
DerVaterm.d. Kind (Bauernfeld)
Schlachtlied (Klopstock), a 8 M.
Variations (Harold's ' Marie ') .
Ittgers Liebeslied (Schober) .
Bchiffers Scheidelied (Do.) .
Winterreise, nos.l— 12 (Mailer)
Allegretto for PF.
^achtgesang im Walde (Seidl),
a 4 M. with 4 Horns
•'ruhlingslied (PoIIak), a 4 M.
)as Lied im Grunen (Reil)
!6gernd leise (Grillparzer), A.,
&4 F.
t
0
.
. '
.
3m I
. (
Lf. 17, 2
Op. 151
Op. 82
Op. 96, 2
Lf . 24, 1
Dp. 89. ]
1-12
Sotth.
)p.!39&
MS.
)p.H5,l
)D. 135
January
Feb. 28
February
II
II
reb.
Apr. 27
April
June
July
jied eines Kriegers
ehnsucht (Majrhofer) .
. I
. (
SCHUBERT.
SCHUBERT.
381
Name.
Key
Opus
No. or
Pull.
Date.
823
835
836
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
12 GrStzer Waltzer
Gratzer Galoppe ....
Winterreise, nos.lS— 24 (.Muller)
Kindermarsch, PF., 4 hands
Trio no. 1, PF., V., Cello .
Altschottische Ballade (Herder)
Der Wallensteiner Lanzknecht
•
G
&
•
Op. 91
Hasl.
Op. 89.
13-24
Gotth.
Op. 99
Op.165,5
Lf 27 1
September
,,
Oct.
Oct. 12
October (?)
November
u
•i
«
Dec. 26
1827
II
M
It
., (?)
„ (?)
„ (?)
„(?)
Der Kreuzzug (Do.) .
Des Fischers Liebesgliick (Do.)
Trio no. 2, PF., V., Cello .
A la bella Irene, Cantata, 2 PFs.
Deutsche Messe, a 4 M.
Song of Annot Lyle (W. Scott)
Norna's Song (Do.) .
Der Hochzeitsbraten, Trio
L'incanto . . . . .
Eb
Ab
Lf. 27, 2
Lf. 27, 3
Op. 100
MS.
Spina
Op. 85,1
Op. 85, 2
Op. 104
Op. 83, 1
Op. 83, 2
Op. 83, 3
Op. 159
11 modo
Phantasie, PF. & V. .
c
1828. [31 years old.]
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
Die Sterne (Leitner)
Der Winterabend (Do.) .
Miriam's Siegesgesang, Oratorio
Aufdem Strom (Bellstab), Sop.
•
Op. 96, 1
Lf. 26
Op. 136
Op. 119
B.&H.
Op. 144
Op. 154
Lf. 15, 2
Biet.-B.
Op."l52
Op. 107
Eiet.-B.
Gotth.
Hasl.
II
Diabelll
Schw.14
Op. 48,
no. 7
Op. 129
Op. 154
Op. 163
MS.
month
January
ii
March
i,
March
May
M
If
June 3
June
June
July
August
Sept. 28
September
u
October
tl
»»
1828
tf
or year.
Symphony no. 10, Orchestra
Oliaracteristic Allegro, 'Lebens-
stiirme,' PF., 4 hands . .
Hymn (Schmidl), 4 Solos &
Chorus (see no. 885) .
Wiederschein (Schlechta)
Allegro, PF
Allegretto, PF
Fugue, PF., 4 hands .
Hondo (' Grand Rondeau'), PF.,
0
Am
Ebm
Eb
Em
A
Eb
•
Bb
Cm
A
0
Mass no. 5, d 4 with Orch. .
Psalm xcii. Bar. & 4 M.
Schwanengesang, nos. 1 — 13 ,
Sonata, PF
Do.
Do
Die Taubenpost (Seidl) .
Benedictus to Mass in C (no. 549).
DerHirtaufdenFelsen (Chezy),
Rearrangement and Orchestra
tion of Hymn no. 870
String Quintet (2 Oelli) . ,
C
Eb
of'
Pieces without date
Name.
Key.
Opus No. or Publ.
888
889
890
891
892
910
911
912
913
914
•915
916
917
943
950
951
952
953
954
955
958
963
Morgenlied (Werner)
Die abgebliihte Linde (Sze'che'nyi) .
Der Flug der Zeit (Do.)
Der Tod u. d. MSdchen (Claudius)
18 Original Tiinze, PF.
Das DOrfchen (Burger), a 4 .
Die Nachtigal (TJnger), do.
FriibAingsHed (Schober), a 4 M.
Jiinglings wonne (Matthisson), a 4 M.
Liebe (Schiller), a 4 M. .
Zum Rundtanz (Salis), a 4 M. .
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
• •
Op. 4, 2
Op. 7, 1
Op. 7, 2
Op. 7, 3
Op. 9, 1, 3, 4, 14-28
Op. 11, 1
Op. 11, 2
Op. 16, 1
Op. 17, 1
Op. 17, 2
Op. 17, 3
Op. 17, 4
Op. 18, 4-12, 1-17
Op. 18, 1-4, 1-3
Op. 21, 2
Op. 22. 2
Op. 23, 1
Op. '23, 2
Op. 27, 3
Op. 27
Op. 33, S-7, 10, 11
Op. 34 i
26 L&ndler, PF
DerSchiffer (Mayrhofer) .
Wehmuth (M, von Collin)
Die Liebe hat gelogen (Platen)
• •
3 Marches heroiques, PF., 4 hands .
7 Deutsche Tunze, PF
Overture, PF., 4 hands
Bm, C,
D
F
Name.
Key.
Opus No. or Publ-
966
967
973
974'
Der Pilgrim (Schiller)
Six Grandes Marches, PF. 4 hands .
Nacht und TrSume (M. v. Collin) .
• *
Op. 37, 1
Op. 40
Op. 43, 2
Op. 40
975
1009
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
34 Vahes sentimentales, PF.
3 Marches Militaires, PF., 4 hands .
An die Leier (Bruchmann)
Im Haine (Do.)
Der Schmetterling (F. Schlegel) .
Die Berge (Do.)
Du liebst mich nicht (Platen)
Dithyrambs (Schiller) .
• •
Op. 50
Op. 51
Op. 56, 2
Op. 56, S
Op. 57, 1
Op. 57, 2
Op. 59, 1
Op. 60, 2
Op. 61
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
Mignon u. d. Harfner (Goethe)
Lied der Mignon, ' Heiss mich' (Do.)
Do. ' So lasst ' (Do.)
Do. ' Sehnsucht ' (Do.)
Divertissement, PP., 4 hands .
Wehmuth (Hiittenbrenner), a 4 M.
Ewige Liebe (Schulze), a 4 M.
Em
Op. 62, 1
Op. 62, 2
Op. 62, 3
Op. 62, 4
Op. 63
Op. 64, 1
Op. 64, 2
Op. 64, 3
1032
1Q49
Hommage aux b. Viennoises,15 Waltzes
and 2 Ecossaises, PF. .
. .
Op. 67
Op. 74
1050
Op. 75
luM
10 Valses Nobles, PF
Op. 77
1064
Op. 90
1068
1074
1078
1079
1080
1031
6 Momens musicals, PF. . . ,
4 Eefrain-Lieder (Seidl) .
Glaube, Hoffnungu. Liebe (Kuflfner)
Phantasie, PF., 4 hands .
D. Hochzeitsbraten, STB. & PF.
Fm
• •
Op. 94
Op. 95
Op. 97
Op. 103
Op. 104
Op 105, 1
1089
Op. 105, 2
TOW
Op. 105, 3
1084
1085
1086
Gott im Ungewitter (TTz) .
Gott der Weltschopfer (Do.) .
Der Mondabend (Ermin) .
• •
Op. 112, 1
Op, 112, 2
Op. 131, 1
1087
]o--
lO'.l'J
1093
1094
1095
10QR
'Notre amilie,' Rondo, PF. 4 hands .
4 Impromptus, PF
Nocturne, PF. & Cello
Trinklied, ' Edit Nonna," a 4 M.
Nachtmusik (Seckendorf),a 4 M.& PF.
Constitutionslied, d 4 M. & Orch.
D
Eb
Op. 138
Op. 142
Op. 148
Op. 155
Op. 156
Op. 157
Op. 169
1097
Op. 173, 3
1098
1099
An den Tod (Schubart) .
• •
Lf. 17, 3
Lf. 22, 2
1100
Lf. 36, 3
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
Licht und Liebe (Collin) .
Fragm.a.d.Gotter Griechnl. (Schiller)
Im Gegenw. Vergangenes (Goethe)
Der Goldschmiedsgesell (Do.) .
Augenlied (Mayrhofer) .
• •
Lf. 41, 1
Lf. 42, 1
Lf. 43
Lf. 48, 6
Lf. 50, 3
MS.
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
Rudigers Heimkehr ; T.,Chor. & Orch.
Morgengesang, u. 4 M , & Orch. .
BegrSbnisslied (Klopstock), a 4 .
Osterlied (Do.), a 4 & PF.
Wein und Liebe (Haug), a 4 M.
Der Entfernten (Salis), a 4 M. .
Lob d. Einsamkeit (Do.), a 4 M. .
• •
• •
E, E, 0,
Spina
Spina
9 Ges., 8
9 Ges., 9
Spina
Spina
1119
A, E
0
Klein m
3 Clavierst.no. 3
1120
E
Artaria
1121
to
20Lfindl.,l, 6, 7,
1131
P, 10, 11, 13-36.
It only remains for me to return my sincere
thanks to those friends who have helped me with
facts and suggestions and with much labour in
the execution of the preceding pages ; such as
Fraulein Caroline Geisler-Schubert, Father Her
mann (Anton) Schubert, and other members of
the composer's family ; to Herr Eugen Heilpern
and the eminent photographers who act under the
name of 'Adele' in Vienna ; my ever kind friend
Herr C. F. Pohl, Librarian of the Musikverein
1 No. 3 originally in Gb.
382
SCHUBERT.
there ; Dr. "Kopfermann, Librarian of the k. k.
Bibliothek, Berlin; Mr. C. V. Stanford; Mr.
C. A. Barry ; Mr. Manns ; Herr A. Dbrffel ;
Mr. Paul David; Messrs. Breitkopf & H artel;
Baron Tauchnitz, jun. ; Mr. L. Engel ; Mr. W. B.
Squire ; and many more. To each and to all
I express my hearty acknowledgments. [Gr.]
SCHUBERT, FERDINAND, one of the elder
brothers of FRANZ SCHUBERT, second son of his
father (see p. 319), born at Vienna Oct. 19, 1794.
After passing the two-years course at the Nor
mal School of S. Anna in 1807-8, he became his
father's assistant at the school in the Lich ten-
thai. In Nov. 1810 he was installed as assistant
(Gehilfe), and in 1816 teacher, at the Imperial
Orphan House (Waisenhaus) in Vienna, where
he continued till March 1820, devoting himself
specially to the Bell- Lancastrian method. He
was then appointed principal teacher and choir
master to the school at Altlerchenfeld, Vienna,
till 1824, when he was nominated to be head
teacher of the Normal School of S. Anna, which
he held from Jan. 22, 1824, till his appointment
as director of the same establishment on March
15, 1854. This position he retained till his death
on Feb. 28, 1859. His merits were recognised
by the bestowal of the Gold Cross of Merit (Ver-
dienstkreuze), with the Crown. During this
long period of useful and efficient service he was
twice married, and had in all 17 children, of
whom Ferdinand, Rudolf, and Hermann are still
(1882) living in Vienna. His daughter Elise
married Linus Geisler, and their daughter, Caro
line G ei si er- Schubert, is now (1882) an esteemed
player and teacher of the pianoforte in Vienna.
Between 1819 and 1853 Ferdinand published 12
school-books on various branches of learning,
which came into general use. Music he learnt
from his father and from Holzer, and left more
than 40 works, of which the following were pub
lished : — Regina Coeli, k 4 and orch. (op. i);
German Requiem, a 4 with organ (op. 2) ; 4
Waisenlieder (op. 3) ; Cadences for PF. in all
keys (op. 4) ; Requiem, k 4 and orch. (op. 9) ;
Mass in F, k 4 and orch. (op. 10) ; Salve Regina
in F, a 4 and orch. (op. n) ; Salve Regina, k 4
and wind (op. 1 2) ; original March and Trio.
The MS. works contain various other pieces of
church music. Of the two Requiems the first is
mentioned in his brother's letter of Aug. 24,
1818 (see p. 330); the second was performed a
few days before Franz's death, and was possibly
the last music he heard. The library of the
Musikverein at Vienna contains the autograph
of Franz Schubert's Mass in G, with oboes (or
clarinets) and bassoons, added by Ferdinand,
July 23, 1847.
Ferdinand's love for his brother and care of,
his memory have been often referred to in the
preceding article (pp. 354, 356, 357). An interest
ing evidence of their attachment is afforded by a
letter of L his to Franz, dated Vienna, July 3,18 24,
and containing the following passage in regard
to a clock at the Ungarische Krone in Vienna,
which played his brother's music: — 'This clock
1 1 owe this letter to Hiss Geisler.
SCHUBERTH.
delighted me not a little, when one day at dinner
for the first time I heard it play some of your
waltzes. I felt so strange at the moment that I
really did not know where I was; it was not
only that it pleased me, it went regularly through
my heart and soul with a fearful pang and
longing, which at last turned into settled melan
choly.' This may be fanciful, but it is the lan
guage of passionate affection, which evidently
animated Ferdinand's whole intercourse with his
great brother. Franz's reply (July 16-18, 1824)
is quite in the same strain. (The above article
is indebted to Wurzbach's Biographisches Lexi
con.) [G.]
SCHUBERT, CAMILLE, the nom de plume of
Camille Prilipp, a music-seller of Paris, composer
of transcriptions and original works for the piano,
amounting in all to the astonishing number of
more than 400. Some of his works enjoyed
great popularity, especially a set of brilliant
waltzes entitled 'Les Dames de Seville.' [G.]
SCHUBERT, FRANZ, a violinist, born of a
musical family at Dresden, July 22, 1808, was a
pupil of Lafont, and rose through various grades
to succeed Lipinski in 1861 as first Concert-
meister (or leader) in his native city. He re
tired in 1873, on the 5oth anniversary of his
entrance into the orchestra. His published
works include Studies, a Duo for violin and
piano, and 2 Concertante for violin and cello.
Schubert's wife, MASCHINKA, a distinguished
bravura singer, was born Aug. 25, 1815, and
appeared at the German opera in London in
1832. [G.]
SCHUBERT, Louis, violinist and singing-
master, born Jan. 27, 1828, at Dessau, went in
his 1 8th year to St. Petersburg, and then as Con-
certmeister to Konigsberg, where he remained
till 1862. He then returned to Dresden, where
he enjoyed a great reputation as a teacher of
singing. He has published a method of singing
in the form of songs, and four of his operettas
have become favourites. [G.]
SCHUBERTH, GOTTLOB, born at Carsdorf,
Aug. n, 1778, received his musical education at
Jena, and learnt the violin from Stamitz. In 1804
he went to Magdeburg, resided there for some
years, and was distinguished as an excellent
clarinet and oboe player. In 1833 he moved
to Hamburg, where he died, Feb. 18, 1846. He
is now remembered as the father of an eminent
family. His eldest son
JULIUS FERDINAND GEORG, born at Magde
burg, July 14, 1804, was the founder of the well-
known firm of J. Schuberth & Co. in Leipzig and
New York. After learning the business of a
music-publisher in Magdeburg, he started in
1826 on his own account at Hamburg, whence
he was enabled to found branch establishments
at Leipzig (1832), and New York (1850). In
1854 he gave up the Hamburg business to his
brother Frederick (see below) and devoted him
self entirely to Leipzig and New York. Besides
his publishing business, Julius Schuberth was an
indefatigable student of language, literature, and
SCHUBEBTH.
music. He was publisher, editor, and proprietor of
a 'Musikalisches Conversations Lexicon' (which
has gone through 10 editions, and from which
the details of the present article have been ob
tained), the 'Hamburger kleiner Musik Zeitung'
(1840-1850), the New York 'Musik Zeitung'
(1867), and 'Schuberth's kleiner Musik Zeitung'
(1871-1872). In 1840 he founded the ' Norddeut-
scher Musikverein and Preis Institut ' at Ham
burg. He received many decorations from the
crowned heads of Germany in recognition of his
services to music. In 1874 ne settled at Leipzig,
where he died, June 9, 1875. His business, which
in 1877 comprised over 6000 publications, has
been carried on with increasing success by his
widow and nephew.
LUDWIG, the second son of Gottlob, was born
April 1 8, 1806, at Magdeburg. He studied under
his father and C. M. von Weber, and when only
16 was music-director at the Stadt Theater of his
native town. He was subsequently Court Capell-
meister at Oldenburg, and after living at Riga
and Konigsberg (1835), became (1845) conductor
of the German Opera at St. Petersburg, where
he died in 1850. His compositions include some
published chamber music, besides operas and
symphonies which remain in MS. His younger
brother,
GAEL, was born at Magdeburg, Feb. 25, 1811.
He learnt the piano from his father, and the
violoncello from L. Hesse. In 1825 he was
placed under Dotzauer at Dresden, and in 1828
made his first concert tour to Ludwigslust and
Hamburg. In 1829 he played at Copenhagen
and Gothenburg, but a series of misfortunes
drove him back to Magdeburg, where he occupied
the post of first cello in the theatre orchestra.
In 1833 he again played in Hamburg with suc
cess, and during the next few years gave concerts
in all the principal towns of North Germany,
Belgium, and Holland, besides visiting Paris and
London (1835). In the autumn of the latter
year he was appointed solo cellist to the Czar.
He remained for 20 years at St. Petersburg,
occupying the posts of musical director at the
University, conductor of the Imperial Court Or
chestra, and inspector of the Imperial Dramatic
College. He died at Zurich, July 22, 1863. His
compositions include chamber music and con
certos for the violoncello, etc.
FRIEDRICH WILHELM AUGUST, fifth son of
Gottlob Schuberth, was born at Magdeburg, Oct.
27, 1817, and since 1853 nas been the head of the
firm of ' Fritz Schuberth' at Hamburg. [W.B.S.]
SCHUBRING, JULIUS, D.D., rector of S.
George's church, Dessau, claims a place in a
Dictionary of Music for his connexion with Men
delssohn. He was born at Dessau, June 2,
1806, was educated there, and at the Universities
of Leipzig (1824) and Berlin (1825-30), at the
latter of which he first made the Mendelssohns'
acquaintance, through a letter from W. Mu'ller
the poet. The acquaintance soon ripened into
a very intimate friendship, for the details of
which see Schubring's admirable Recollections of
Mendelssohn (' Erinnerungen ' etc., in 'Daheim/
SCHULZ.
383
1866, No. 26; and ' Musical World,' May 12,
19, 1866). He was much consulted by Mendels
sohn on the words of ' St. Paul ' and ' Elijah/ in
reference to which and to a possible oratorio on
S. Peter, ten letters are printed in the published
' Briefe.' The Recollections are models of their
class, and deserve republication. Schubring,
besides several theological works, has published
a 'Gesangbtichlein' of hymns in rhythm for
schools (Dessau, 1 85 7), and assisted in compiling
the Anhalt Gesangbuch for Church, School, and
Home use (Elberfeld, 1859). He is still living
and working, to remind us how prematurely
Mendelssohn was cut off. [G.]
SCHULHOF, JULIUS — dear to player and
dancer for his Galop di Bravura, Impromptu
Polka, and many more brilliant and clever PF.
pieces — was born at Prague, Aug. 2, 1825. He
learned the piano from Kisch, and counterpoint
from Tomaschek, and before he was 14 made a
successful appearance as a player. Notwith
standing his success, the boy's ambition was too
great to allow him to remain in Prague, and in
1842 he went to Paris, then a hotbed of piano
forte virtuosity. Here a fortunate interview with
Chopin gave him his opportunity. He played in
public (Nov. 2, 1845), and published his first
two works, of which op. I, an Allegro Brillant,
was dedicated to Chopin. After a lengthened
residence in Paris he took a very extended tour
through France, Austria (1849-50), England,
Spain (1851), and even South Russia and the
Crimea (1853). He has since divided his time
between Dresden and Paris. [G.]
SCHULZ. [See PRJETORIUS, iii. 24.]
SCHULZ, EDOUARD, pianist, born Feb. 18,
1812; died Sept. 15, 1876. His father — a Hun
garian — settled in Vienna, where Edouard as a
child had once the privilege of playing to Bee
thoven. He came with his father and younger
brother Leonard, both guitar players, to London
in 1826, and the trio gave their first concert at
Kirkman's rooms, April 24 of that year; Edouard
playing the physharmonica. In 1828 they ap
peared in a Philharmonic Concert. Edouard's
fine pianoforte playing attracted the notice of
George IV. and the Duke of Devonshire, and
he became the favourite teacher of the Eng
lish aristocracy, to whom his distinguished
manners endeared him. He might have been
one of the very first pianists had he not over-
fatigued his hands by too zealous practice of the
then new technique of extensions. Asa teacher
he amassed a fortune, £1000 of which he be
queathed to the Royal Society of Musicians, the
third legacy of like amount left by foreign musi
cians settled in London. [A. J.H.]
SCHULZ, JOHANN ABRAHAM PETER, son of
a baker, born at Liineburg, March 31, 1747-
His master was Schmiigel, a local organist of
ability, whose descriptions of Berlin and of Kirn-
berger's labours so excited him that at the age
of 15, without money and against the wish of his
family, he went thither and put himself under
the protection of Kirnberger, who was very good
384
SCHULZ.
to him, under whom he studied and to whom he
became greatly attached. In 1768 he was for
tunate enough to travel in France, Italy, and
Germany under good auspices. In 1773 ^e re~
turned to Berlin, and found his old master and
Sulzer at work on their ' Theory of the Fine
Arts,' and undertook the musical portion of it
from S to the end. He was also Capellmeister
to the French theatre at Berlin, and afterwards
to the private theatre of the Crown Princess at
Berlin and that of Prince Henry at Reinsberg,
where he stayed for 7 years from April i, 1780.
His choruses to 'Athalia,' produced while there,
were translated and brought out at Copenhagen,
and the result was an offer from the King of
Denmark to be his Capellmeister at a salary
of 2000 thalers. This he accepted and held for
8 years with great credit and advantage to the
place. His health at length obliged him to
leave, and he departed, Sept. 29, 1795, for Ham
burg, Liineburg, and Berlin. He lost his wife,
and at length, on June 10, 1800, died at Schwedt
deeply and widely lamented. Schulz was a
prolific composer ; 10 operas and 3 large sacred
works are quoted by Fetis and Mendel, various
PF. compositions and some literary works, in
cluding a treatise on a new mode of writing
music. He also edited Kirnberger's True Prin
ciples of Harmony. But his true claim to
notice rests on his songs. He was the first to
give the Volkslied an artistic turn, and in fact
took the first step which led to Schubert. He
was very careful to get good words, and as a
considerable move was taking place among the
poets at that date (i 7 70-80), and Burger, Claudius,
Holty, and others were writing, he had good op
portunities, and many of his settings were pub
lished in the Gottingen ' Musenalmanach ' and
Voss's ' Almanach.' He published also ( Lieder
in Volkston bey dem Klavier zu singen ' (1782),
containing 48 songs, 2nd ed. 1785 in 2 parts, and
a 3rd part in 1790. His songs were very much
sung for years after their appearance, and are even
Btill the delight of schoolboys, a great tribute to
their freshness and melody. (See Reissmann,
Gesch. d. Deutschen Liedes, 149.) [G.j
SCHULZE, J. F. AND SONS, a firm of organ-
builders, whose founder, J. F. Schulze, was born
at Milbitz-bei-Paulinzella, Thuringia, in 1794,
and began his manufactory there in 1825. His
first organs were for Horba (with 10 stops), and
Milbitz (21 stops). In 1825 he moved to Paul-
inzella, where his business largely increased.
At this period his principal organs were those
for Bremen cathedral, and Solingen. In 1851,
the firm — then J. F. Schulze and Sons — sent an
organ to the International Exhibition in Hyde
Park, which obtained a prize medal and was
the beginning of much work done for England.
This is now in the Town Hall, Northampton.
In 1854 they built the great organ in the Mari-
enkirche at Liibeck. J. F. Schulze died in 1858,
but was succeeded by his three sons, the most
distinguished of whom was Heinrich Edmund,
who introduced many new and valuable improve
ments. On the rebuilding of the parish church
SCHUMANN.
of Doncaster, England, after the fire in 1853, the
construction of the organ was entrusted to the
Schulze firm, ar.d it proved a very great success.
Besides this fine instrument, their most import
ant organs are in Bremen, Diisseldorf, Sost, and
Aplerbeck. H. E. Schulze died in 1878 at the
age of 54, and shortly after, on the death of the
surviving brother, the firm ceased to exist.
The Schulzes' organs are most celebrated for
their flue-pipes, which are constructed so as to
admit as much wind as possible. In order to do
this the feet are opened very wide, and the pipes
are in consequence cut up unusually high. By
this means, with a comparatively low pressure of
wind an extraordinarily rich quantity of tone is
produced. The Schulzes carried the same prin
ciples into their wooden flute pipes. Their
organs are also celebrated for their string-toned
stops, but the drawback in all of these is a cer
tain slowness in their speech. Besides the organs
at Doncaster and Northampton, the Schulzes
have instruments in England at churches at
Armley; Leeds (in conjunction with Hill) ; Hin-
dley, Wigan ; Tyne Dock, South Shields ; Harro-
gate; also at Northampton Town Hall; Charter
house School, Godalming; Seaton Carew (Thos.
Walker, Esq.). They were also employed by
Mr. Hopkins to make some alterations and ad
ditions to the organ in the Temple church,
London. [W.B.S.]
SCHUMANN, ROBEKT ALEXANDER, born June
8, 1810, at Zwickau in Saxony, was the youngest
son of Friedrich August Gottlob Schumann (born
1 773)5 a bookseller, whose father was a clergyman
in Saxony, and whose mother, Johanna Christiana
(born 1771), was the daughter of Herr Schnabel,
Rathschirurgus (surgeon to the town council) at
Zeitz. Schumann cannot have received any in
citement towards music from his parents ; his
father, however, took a lively interest in the belles
lettres, and was himself known as an author. He
promoted his son's leanings towards art in every
possible way, with which however his mother
seems to have had no sympathy. In the small
provincial town where Schumann spent the first
eighteen years of his life there was no musician
capable of helping him beyond the mere rudiments
of the art. There was a talented town-musician,
who for several decades was the best trumpeter
in the district,1 but, as was commonly the case,
he practised his art simply as a trade. The
organist of the Marienkirche, J. G. Kuntzsch,
Schumann's first pianoforte teacher, after a few
years declared that his pupil was able to progress
alone, and that his instruction might cease. He
was so impressed with the boy's talent, that
when Schumann subsequently resolved to devote
himself wholly to art, Kuntzsch prophesied that
he would attain to fame and immortality, and
that in him the world would possess one of its
greatest musicians. Some twenty years later, in
1845, Schumann dedicated to him his Studies for
the Pedal-Piano, op. 56. [See vol. ii. p. 77 a.]
His gift for music showed itself early. He
i Schumann's ' Gesammelte Schriften,' ii. 126 (1st ed.).
SCHUMANN.
began to compose, as he tells us himself, before
he was seven. According to this he must have
begun to play the piano, at latest, in his sixth
year. When he was about eleven, he accom
panied at a performance of Friedrich Schneider's
' Weltgericht,' conducted by Kuntzsch, standing
up at the piano to do it. At home, with the aid
of some young musical companions, he got up
performances of vocal and instrumental music
which he arranged to suit their humble powers.
In more extended circles too, he appeared as a
pianoforte-player, and is said to have had a
wonderful gift for extempore playing. His father
took steps to procure for him the tuition of C. M.
von Weber, who had shortly before (1817) been
appointed Capellmeister in Dresden. Weber
declared himself ready to undertake the guidance
of the young genius, but the scheme fell through
for reasons unknown. From that time Schumann
remained at Zwickau, where circumstances were
not favourable to musical progress ; he was left
to his own instruction, and every inducement to
further progress must have come from himself
alone. Under these circumstances, a journey
made when he was nine years old to Carlsbad,
where he first heard a great pianoforte-player—
Ignaz Moscheles — must have been an event
never to be forgotten ; and indeed during his
whole life he retained a predilection for certain
of Moscheles's works, and a reverence for his
person. The influence of the pianoforte technique
of Moscheles on him appears very distinctly in
the variations published as op. I.
At the age of ten he entered the 4th class at
the Gymnasium (or Academy) at Zwickau, and
remained there till Easter, 1828. He had then
risen to the ist class, and left with a certifi
cate of qualification for the University. During
this period his devotion to music seems to have
been for a time rather less eager, in consequence
of the interference of his school-work and of
other tastes. Now, at the close of his boy
hood, a strong interest in poetry, which had
been previously observed in him, but which
had meanwhile been merged in his taste for
music, revived with increased strength ; he rum
maged through his father's book-shop, which
favoured this tendency, in search of works on the
art of poetry ; poetical attempts of his own were
more frequent, and at the age of 14 Robert had
already contributed some literary efforts to a
work brought out by his father and called ' Bil-
dergallerie der beriihmtesten Menschen aller
Volker und Zeiten' (Portrait-gallery of the most
famous men of all nations and times). That he had
a gift for poetry is evident from two Epithalamia
given by Wasielewski (Biographic Schumann's,
3rd ed., Bonn 1880, p. 305). In 1827 he set a
number of his own poems to music, and it is
worthy of note that it was not by the classical
works of Goethe and Schiller that Schumann was
most strongly attracted. His favourite writers
were Schulze, the tender and rhapsodical author
of ' Die bezauberte Hose' (The Enchanted Rose);
and the unhappy Franz vonSonnenberg, who went
out of his mind ; of foreign poets, Byron especially ;
VOL. in. PT. 3.
SCHUMANN.
385
but above all, Jean Paul, with whose works he
made acquaintance in his 1 7th year (at the same
time as with the compositions of Franz Schubert).
These poets represent the cycle of views, senti
ments and feelings, under whose spell Schumann's
poetical taste, strictly speaking, remained through
out his life. And in no musician has the influence
of his poetical tastes on his music been deeper
than in him.
On March 29, 1828, Schumann matriculated at
the University of Leipzig as Studiosus Juris. It
would have been more in accordance with his
inclinations to have devoted himself at once
wholly to art, and his father would no doubt have
consented to his so doing ; but he had lost his
father in 1826, and his mother would not hear of
an artist's career. Her son dutifully submitted,
although decidedly averse to the study of juris
prudence. Before actually joining the university
he took a short pleasure trip into South Germany,
in April, 1828. He had made acquaintance in
Leipzig with a fellow-student named Gisbert
Rosen ; and a common enthusiasm for Jean Paul
soon led to a devoted and sympathetic friendship.
Rosen went to study at Heidelberg, and the first
object of Schumann's journey was to accompany
him on his way. In Munich he made the ac
quaintance of Heine, in whose house he spent
several hours. On his return journey he stopped
at Bayreuth to visit Jean Paul's widow, and re
ceived from her a portrait of her husband.
During the first few months of his university
life, Schumann was in a gloomy frame of mind.
A students' club to which he belonged for a time,
struck him as coarse and shallow, and he could
not make up his mind to begin the course of study
he had selected. A large part of the first half-
year had passed by and still — as he writes to his
friend — he had been to no college, but ' had
worked exclusively in private, that is to say, had
played the piano and written a few letters and
Jean Pauliads.'
In this voluntary inactivity and solitude the
study of Jean Paul must certainly have had a
special charm for him. That writer, unsurpassed
in depicting the tender emotions, with his dazzling
and even extravagant play of digressive fancy, his
excess of feeling over dramatic power, his inces
sant alternations between tears and laughter, has
always been the idol of sentimental women and
ecstatic youths. ' If everybody read Jean Paul,'
Schumann writes to Rosen, ' they would be better-
natured, but they would be unhappier ; he has
often brought me to the verge of desperation, still
the rainbow of peace bends serenely above all the
tears, and the soul is wonderfully lifted up and
tenderly glorified.' In precisely the same way
did Gervinus give himself up for a time to the
same influence ; but his manly and vigorous
nature freed itself from the enervating spell.
Schumann's artistic nature, incomparably more
finely strung, remained permanently subject to
it. Even in his latest years he would become
violently angry if any one ventured to doubt or
criticise Jean Paul's greatness as an imaginative
writer, and the close affinity of their natures is
Co
380
SCHUMANN.
unmistakeable. Schumann himself tells us how
once, as a child, at midnight, when all the house
hold were asleep, he had in a dream and with his
eyes closed, stolen down to the old piano, and
played a series of chords, weeping bitterly the
while. So early did he betray that tendency to
overstrung emotion which found its most powerful
nourishment in Jean Paul's writings.
Music, however, is a social art, and it soon
brought him back again to human life. In the
house of Professor *• Carus he made several inter
esting acquaintances, especially that of Marschner,
who was then living in Leipzig, and had brought
out his 'Vampyr' there in the spring of 1828.
His first meeting with Wieck, the father of his
future wife, took place in the same year; and
Schumann took several pianoforte lessons from
him. Several music-loving students met together
there, and all kinds of chamber-music were prac
tised. They devoted themselves with especial
ardour to the works of Schubert, whose death on
Nov. 19, 1828, was deeply felt by Schumann.
Impelled by Schubert's example, he wrote at this
time 8 Polonaises for four hands ; also a Quartet
for piano and strings, and a number of songs to
Byron's words; all of which remain unpublished.
Besides these occupations, he m;ide a more inti
mate acquaintance with the clavier works of
Sebastian Bach. It is almost self-evident that
what chiefly fascinated Schumann in Bach's com
positions was the mysterious depth of sentiment
revealed in them. Were it not so, it would be
impossible to conceive of Bach in connection with
the chaotic Jean Paul ; and yet Schumann himself
says that in early life Bach and Jean Paul had
exercised the most powerful influence upon him.
Considering the way in which his musical educa
tion had been left to itself, the fact of his so
thoroughly appreciating the wealth and fulness of
life in Bach's compositions at a time when Bach
was looked upon only as a great contrapuntist,
is clear evidence of the greatness of his own
genius; which indeed had some affinity with that
of Bach. The ingenuity of outward form in Bach's
works was neither strange nor unintelligible to
him. For although Schumann had hitherto had
no instructor in composition, it need scarcely be
said that he had long ago made himself familiar
with the most essential parts of the composer's
art, and that constant practice in composition
must have given him much knowledge and skill
in this branch of his art.
At Easter, 1829, Schumann followed his friend
Rosen to the university of Heidelberg. The
young jurists were perhaps tempted thither by
the lectures of the famous teacher, A. F. J.
Thibaut; but it is evident that other things
contributed to form Schumann's resolution : the
situation of the town — a perfect Paradise — the
gaiety of the people, and the nearness of Switzer
land, Italy and France. A delightful prospect
promised to open to him there: 'That will be
life indeed!' he writes to his friend; fat Mi
chaelmas we will go to Switzerland, and from
i ' ' Patientibus Cams, sed clarus inter dodos,' (Berlioz. Voyage
Musical, Letter IV.)
SCHUMANN.
thence who knows where?' On his journey to
Heidelberg chance threw him into the society
of Willibald Alexis. As they found pleasure in
each other's company, Schumann incontinently
turned out of his way and went with the poet
some distance down the Rhine. Like Marsch
ner, who indeed was somewhat their senior,
Alexis had trodden the path which Schumann
was destined to follow, and had reached art by
way of the law. No doubt this added to Schu
mann's interest -in the acquaintance. It cannot
be denied that even in Heidelberg Schumann
carried on his legal studies in a very desultory
manner, though Thibaut himself was a living
proof that that branch of learning could co-exist
with a true love and comprehension of music.
Only a few years before (in 1825) Thibaut had
published his little book, 'Ueber Reinheit der
Tonkunst' (On Purity in Musical Art), a work
which at that time essentially contributed to
alter the direction of musical taste in Germany.
Just as in his volume Thibaut attacks the de
generate state of church music, Schumann, at
a later date, was destined to take up arms, in
word and deed, against the flat insipidity of
concert and chamber music. Nevertheless the
two men never became really intimate ; in one,
no doubt, the doctor too greatly preponderated,
and in the other the artist. Thibaut himself
subsequently advised Schumann to abandon the
law and devote himself entirely to music.
Indeed if Schumann was industrious in any
thing at Heidelberg it was in pianoforte-playing.
After practising for seven hours in the day, he
would invite a friend to come in the evening
and play with him, adding that he felt in a
particularly happy vein that day ; and even
during an excursion with friends he would take
a dumb keyboard with him in the carriage. By
diligent use of the instruction he had received
from Wieck in Leipzig, he brought himself to
high perfection as an executant ; and at the
same time increased his efforts at improvisation.
One of his musical associates at this time used
afterwards to say that from the playing of no
other artist, however great, had he ever ex
perienced such ineffaceable musical impressions ;
the ideas seem to pour into the player's mind
in an inexhaustible flow, and their profound
originality and poetic charm already clearly
foreshadowed the main features of his musical
individuality. Schumann appeared only once in
public, at a concert given by a musical society at
Heidelberg, where he played Moscheles's varia
tions on the ' Alexandermarsch' with great suc
cess. He received many requests to play again,
but refused them all, probably, as a student,
finding it not convenient.
It will no doubt be a matter of surprise that
Schumann could have justified himself in thus
spending year after year in a merely nominal
study of the law, while in fact wholly given up
to his favourite taste and pursuit. A certain
lack of determination, a certain shrinking from
anything disagreeable, betray themselves during
these years as his general characteristics, and
SCHUMANN.
were perhaps an integral part of his nature.
At the same time his conduct is to a certain
extent explicable, by the general conditions of
German student-life. Out of the strict discipline
of the Gymnasium the student steps at once into
the unlimited freedom of the University. The vio
lence of the contrast most easily overpowers the
most gifted natures, and sweeps them away into
an exclusive enjoyment of the life it offers. Those
who have some self-control after a time struggle
out of the whirlpool, and avail themselves as best
they may of the remaining years of study, rescu
ing from that period a precious store of poetical
reminiscences which suffice to gild the prose of
later life with an ideal light. It was the in
toxicating poetry of the student life which Schu
mann drank in deep draughts. Its coarseness
was repellent to his refined nature, and his
innate purity and nobility guarded him against
moral degradation ; but he lived like a rover
rejoicing in this bright world as it lies open to
him, worked little, spent much, got into debt,
and was as happy as a fish in the water. Be
sides its tender and rapturous side, his nature
had a vein of native sharpness and humour.
With all these peculiarities he could live his
student's life to the full, though in his own
apparently quiet and unassertive way. The
letters in which he discusses money -matters
with his guardian, Herr Rudel, a merchant of
Zwickau, show how he indulged his humorous
mood even in these : ' Dismal things I have to
tell you, respected Herr Rudel,' he writes on
June 2i, 1830; 'in the first place, that I have
a repetitorium which costs 80 gulden every
half-year, and secondly, that within a week
I have been under arrest by the town (don't
be shocked) for not paying 30 gulden of other
college dues.' And on another occasion, when
the money he had asked for to make a journey
home for the holidays did not arrive : ' I am
the only student here, and wander alone about
the streets and woods, forlorn and poor, like a
beggar, and with debts into the bargain. Be
kind, most respected Herr Rudel, and only this
once send me some money — only money — and do
not drive me to seek means of setting out which
might not be pleasant to you.' The reasons he
employs to prove to his guardian that he ought
not to be deprived of means for a journey into
Italy are most amusing : ' At any rate I shall
have made the journey ; and as I must make
it once, it is all the same whether I use the
money for it now or later.' Then in a perfectly
amiable way he puts the pistol to his breast,
'Of course I could borrow the money here at
once if I chose, at 10 or 12 per cent, but this
method I should of course adopt only under the
most unnatural circumstances, i.e. if I get no
money from home.' When, at Easter 1830, he
wished to remain another half-year at Heidelberg,
he excused the wish by saying that 'residence
here is immeasurably more instructive, useful and
interesting, than in flat Leipzig.' This contrast
of 'flat' Leipzig with the picturesque hilliness
of Heidelberg, sufficiently betrays what it was
SCHUMANN.
387
that Schumann included under the terms 'in
structive and useful/ His compositions, too,
plainly evince how deeply the poetical aspect
of student life had affected him, and had left its
permanent mark on him. I need only remind
the reader of Kerner's 'Wanderlitd' (op. 35,
no. 3), dedicated to an old fellow-student at
Heidelberg, and of Eichendorff's ' Friihlings-
fahrt' (op. 45, no. 2). Among German songs
of the highest class, there is not one in which
the effervescent buoyancy of youth craving for
distant flights has found such full expression,
at once so thoroughly German and so purely
ideal, as in this ' Wanderlied,' which indeed,
with a different tune, is actually one of the most
favourite of student songs. ' Frtihlingsfahrt '
tells of two young comrades who quit home for
the first time : —
So jubelnd recht in die hellen
Klingenden, singenden Wellen
Des vollen Fruhlings hinaus.
Kejoicing in the singing
And joyous, echoing ringing
Of full and perfect Spring.
One of them soon finds a regular subsistence and
a comfortable home ; the other pursues glitter
ing visions, yields to the thousand temptations
of the world, and finally perishes; it is a por
trait of a German student drawn from the life,
and the way in which Schumann has treated it
shows that he was drawing on the stores of his
own experience. And indeed he trod on the verge
of the abyss which yawns close to the flowery
path of a youth who, for the first time, enjoys
complete liberty. His letters often indicate this,
particularly one written April 5, 1833, to one
of his former fellow -students, in which he says
that his life as a citizen is, to his great joy,
sober, industrious and steady, and thus a con
trast to that at Heidelberg.
Several journeys also served to infuse into
Schumann's student life the delight of free and
unrestrained movement. In August 1829 he
went for a pleasure trip to north Italy, quite
alone, for two friends who had intended to go,
failed him. But perhaps the contemplative and
dreamy youth enjoyed the loveliness of the
country and the sympathetic Italian nature only
the more thoroughly for being alone. Nor were
little adventures of gallantry wanting. Frag
ments of a diary kept at this time, which are
preserved (Wasielewski, p. 325), reveal to us
the pleasant sociableness of the life which Schu
mann now delighted in. The Italian music
which he then heard could indeed do little to
wards his improvement, except that it gave him,
for the first time, the opportunity of hearing
Paganini. The deep impression made by that
remarkable player is shown by Schumann's visit
to Frankfort (Easter 1830) with several friends
to hear him again, and by his arrangement of
his 'Caprices' for the pianoforte (op. 3 and 10).
Shortly after this he seems to have heard Ernst
also in Frankfort. In the summer of 1830 he
made a tour to Strassburg, and on the way back
to Saxony visited his friend Rosen at Detmold.
Cc2
388
SCHUMANN.
When Schumann entered upon his third year
of study, he made a serious effort to devote
himself to jurisprudence ; he took what was
called a JRepetitorium, that is, he began going over
again with considerable difficulty, and under
the care and guidance of an old lawyer, what
he had neglected during two years. He also
endeavoured to reconcile himself to the idea of
practical work in public life or the government
service. His spirit soared up to the highest goal,
and at times he may have flattered his fancy
with dreams of having attained it ; but he must
have been convinced of the improbability of such
dreams ever coming true ; and indeed he never
got rid of his antipathy to the law as a profes
sion, even in the whole course of his Repeti-
torium. On the other hand it must be said,
that if he was ever to be a musician, it was
becoming high time for it, since he was now
20 years old. Thus every consideration urged him
to the point. Schumann induced his mother,
who was still extremely averse to the calling of
a musician, to put the decision in the hands of
Friedrich Wieck. Wieck did not conceal from
him that such a step ought only to be taken
after the most thorough self-examination, but if
he had already examined himself, then Wieck
could only advise him to take the step. Upon
this his mother yielded, and Robert Schumann
became a musician. The delight and freedom
which he inwardly felt when the die was cast,
must have shown him that he had done right.
At first his intention was only to make himself
a great pianoforte-player, and he reckoned that
in six years he would be able to compete with
any pianist. But he still felt very uncertain as
to his gift as a composer ; the words which he
wrote to his mother on July 30, 1830 — 'Now
and then I discover that I have imagination, and
perhaps a turn for creating things myself '
sound curiously wanting in confidence, when we
remember how almost exclusively Schumann's
artistic greatness was to find expression in his
compositions.
He quitted Heidelberg late in the summer
of 1830, in order to resume his studies with
Wieck in Leipzig. He was resolved, after having
wasted two years and a half, to devote himself
to his new calling with energetic purpose and
manly vigour. And faithfully did he keep to
his resolution. The plan of becoming a great
pianist had, however, to be given up after a year.
Actuated by the passionate desire to achieve a per
fect technique as speedily as possible, Schumann
devised a contrivance by which the greatest pos
sible dexterity of finger was to be attained in
the shortest time. By means of this ingenious
appliance the third finger was drawn back
and kept still, while the other fingers had to
practice exercises. But the result was that the
tendons of the third finger were overstrained,
the finger was crippled, and for some time the
whole right hand was injured. This most serious
condition was alleviated by medical treat
ment. Schumann recovered the use of his hand,
and could, when needful, even play the piano ; ,
SCHUMANN.
but the third finger remained useless, so that
he was for ever precluded from the career of
a virtuoso. Although express evidence is want
ing, we may assume with certainty that this
unexpected misfortune made a deep impression
upon him ; he saw himself once more con
fronted with the question whether it was advis
able for him to continue in the calling he
had chosen. That he answered it in the affirm
ative shows that during this time his confidence
in his own creative genius had wonderfully
increased. He soon reconciled himself to the
inevitable, learned to appreciate mechanical
dexterity at its true value, and turned his
undivided attention to composition. He con
tinued henceforth in the most friendly rela
tions with his pianoforte-master, Wieck ; indeed
until the autumn of 1832 he lived in the same
house with him (Grimmaische Strasse, No. 36),
and was almost one of the family. For his in
structor in composition, however, he chose
Heinrich Dorn, at that time conductor of the
opera in Leipzig, subsequently Capellmeister
at Riga, Cologne, and Berlin, and still living
in Berlin in full possession of his intellectual
vigour. Dorn was a clever and sterling com
poser; he recognised the greatness of Schu
mann's genius, and devoted himself with much
interest to his improvement.1 It was impossible
as yet to confine Schumann to a regular course
of composition : he worked very diligently, but
would take up now one point of the art of com
position and now another. In 1836 he writes
to Dorn at Riga that he often regrets having
learnt in too irregular a manner at this time;
but when he adds directly afterwards that, not
withstanding this, he had learnt more from
Dorn's teaching than Dorn would believe, we
may take this last statement as true. Schu
mann was no longer a tyro in composition, but
had true musical genius, and his spirit was
already matured. Under such circumstances he
was justified in learning in his own way.
In the winter of 1832-3, he lived at Zwickau,
and for a time also with his brothers at Schnee-
berg. Besides a pianoforte- concerto, which still
remains a fragment, he was working at a sym
phony in G minor, of which the first move
ment was publicly performed in the course of
the winter both at Schneeberg and Zwickau.
If we may trust certain evidence (see ' Musik-
alisches Wochenblatt' ; Leipzig, 1875, p. 180),
the whole symphony was performed at Zwickau
in 1835, under Schumann's own direction, and
the last movement was almost a failure.
At all events the symphony was finished, and
Schumann expected it to be a great success ; in
this he must have been disappointed, for it has
never been published. The first performance of
the first movement at Zwickau took place at a
concert given there on Nov. 1 8, 1832, by Wieck's
daughter Clara, who was then thirteen years of
i Schumann's gratitude to him is thus expressed :—' The man who
first gave a hand to me as I climbed upwards, and. when I began to
doubt myself, drew me aloft so that I should see less of the common
herd of mankind, and more of the pure air of art.'
SCHUMANN.
age. Even then the performances of this gifted
girl, who was so soon to take her place as the
greatest female pianist of Germany, were aston
ishing, and by them, as Schumann puts it,
' Zwickau was fired with enthusiasm for the
first time in its life.' It is easily conceivable
that Schumann himself was enthusiastically de
lighted with Clara, adorned as she was with the
twofold charm of childlike sweetness and artistic
genius. ' Think of perfection,' he writes to
a friend about her on April 5, 1833, ' and T will
agree to it.' And many expressions in his
letters seems even to betray a deeper feeling, of
which he himself did not become fully aware
until several years later.
Schumann's circumstances allowed him to re
visit Leipzig in March, 1833, an^ even to live
there for a time without any definite occupa
tion. He was not exactly well off, but he had
enough to enable him to live as a single man
of moderate means. The poverty from which
BO many of the greatest musicians have suf
fered, never formed part of Schumann's expe
rience. He occupied himself with studies in
composition, chiefly in the contrapuntal style, in
which he had taken the liveliest interest since
making the acquaintance of Bach's works ; besides
this his imagination, asserting itself more and
more strongly, impelled him to the creation of
free compositions. From this year date the im
promptus for piano on a romance by Clara Wieck,
which Schumann dedicated to her father, and
published in August, 1833, as op. 5.1 In June
he wrote the first and third movements of the G
minor Sonata (op. 22), and at the same time
began the Ffl minor Sonata (op. n) and com
pleted the Toccata (op. 7), which had been
begun in 1829. He also arranged a second
set of Paganini's violin caprices for the piano
(op. 10), having made a first attempt of the
same kind (op. 3) in the previous year. Mean
while he lived a quiet and almost monotonous
life. Of family acquaintances he had few,
nor did he seek them. He found a faithful
friend in Frau Henriette Voigt, who was as
excellent a pianist as she was noble and sym
pathetic in soul. She was a pupil of Ludwig
Berger, of Berlin, and died young in the year
1839. Schumann was wont as a rule to spend
his evenings with a small number of intimate
friends in a restaurant. These gatherings gene
rally took place at the * Kaffeebaum ' (Kleine
Fleischergasse No. 3). He himself however
generally remained silent by preference, even in
this confidential circle of friends. Readily as he
could express himself with his pen, he had but
little power of speech. Even in affairs of no
importance, which could have been transacted
most readily and simply by word of mouth, he
usually preferred to write. It was moreover a kind
of enjoyment to him to muse in dreamy silence.
Henriette Voigt told W. Taubert that one lovely
summer evening, after making music with Schu
mann, they both felt inclined to go on the water.
i Hofmeister, Leipzig, and Ch. Schumann, Scbneeberg.
SCHUMANN.
389
They sat side by side in the boat for an hour in
silence. At parting Schumann pressed her hand
and said, ' To-day we have perfectly understood
one another.'
It was at these evening gatherings at the
restaurant in the winter of 1833-4 that the plan
of starting a new musical paper was matured.
It was the protest of youth, feeling itself im
pelled to new things in art, against the existing
state of music. Although Weber, Beethoven,
and Schubert had only been dead a few years,
though Spohr and Marschner were still in their
prime, and Mendelssohn was beginning to be
celebrated, the general characteristic of the music
of about the year 1830 was either superficiality
or else vulgar mediocrity. ' On the stage Eossini
still reigned supreme, and on the pianoforte
scarcely anything was heard but Herz and Hun-
ten.' Under these conditions the war might have
been more suitably carried on by means of im
portant works of art than by a periodical about
music. Musical criticism, however, was itself in
a bad way at this time. The periodical called
' Csecilia,' published by Schott, which had been in
existence since 1824, was unfitted for the general
reader, both by its contents and by the fact of
its publication in parts. The 'Berliner allge-
meine musikalische Zeitung,' conducted by Marx,
had come to an end in 1 830. The only periodical
of influence and importance in 1833 was the
' Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung,' published by
Breitkopf & Hartel of Leipzig, and at that time
edited by G. W. Fink. But the narrow view taken
of criticism in that periodical, its inane mildness
of judgment — Schumann used to call it 'Honig-
pinselei ' or ' Honey-daubing ' — its lenity towards
the reigning insipidity and superficiality, could
not but provoke contradiction from young people
of high aims. And the idea of first bringing the
lever to bear on the domain of critical author
ship, in order to try their strength, must have
been all the more attractive to these hot-headed
youths, since most of them had had the advantage
of a sound scholarly education and knew how to
handle their pens. On the other hand, they felt
that they were not yet strong enough to guide
the public taste into new paths by their own
musical productions ; and of all the set Schumann
was the most sensible of this fact.
Such were the grounds on which, on April 3,
1834, the first number of the ' Neue Zeitschriffc
fur Musik' saw the light. Schumann himself
called it the organ of youth and movement. As
its motto he even chose this passage from the
prologue to Shakespeare's Henry VIII : —
Only they
Who come to hear a merry bawdy play,
A noise of targets, or to see a fellow
In a long motley coat guarded with yellow,
"Will be deceived —
a passage which sufficiently expresses his inten
tion of contending against an empty flattering
style of criticism, and upholding the dignity of
art. ' The day of reciprocal compliments,' says
the preliminary notice, ' is gradually dying out,
and we must confess that we shall do nothing
390
SCHUMANN.
towards reviving it. The critic who dares not
attack what is bad, is but a half-hearted supporter
of what is good.' The doings of ' the three arch-
foes of art — those who have no talent, those who
have vulgar talent, and those who having real
talent, write too much,' are not to be left in peace ;
'their latest phase, the result of a mere cul
tivation of executive technique,' is to be combatted
as inartistic. 'The older time,' on the other
hand, 'and the works it produced, are to be
recalled with insistance, since it is only at these
pure sources that new beauties in art can be
found.' Moreover the ' Zeitschrift ' is to assist
in bringing in a new 'poetic' period by its
benevolent encouragement of the higher efforts
of young artists, and to accelerate its advent.
The editing was in the hands of Robert Schu
mann, Friedrich Wieck, Ludwig Schunke, and
Julius Knorr.
Of all these Schunke alone was exclusively a
musician. That gifted pianist, who belonged to
a widely dispersed family of esteemed musicians,
came to Leipzig in 1833, and became a great
friend of Schumann's, but died at the end of the
following year at the early age of 24. The three
other editors were by education half musicians
and half litterateurs, even Julius Knorr (born
1807) having studied philology in Leipzig. Schu
mann co-operated largely in Schunke's contribu
tions (signed with the figure 3), for handling the
pen was not easy to him. Hartmann of Leipzig
was at first the publisher and proprietor of the
Zeitschrift, but at the beginning of 1835 ^ passed
into the hands of J. A. Earth of Leipzig, Schu
mann becoming at the same time proprietor and
sole editor. He continued the undertaking under
these conditions till the end of June 1844 ; so
that his management of the paper extended over
a period of above ten years. On Jan. I, 1845,
Franz Brendel became the editor, and after the
summer of 1 844 Schumann never again wrote for
it, with the exception of a short article1 on
Johannes Brahms to be mentioned hereafter.
Schumann's own articles are sometimes signed
with a number — either 2 or some combination
with 2, such as 12, 22, etc. He also concealed
his identity under a variety of names — Florestan,
Eusebius, Raro, Jeanquirit. In his articles we
meet with frequent mention of the Davidsbundler,
a league or society of artists or friends of art who
had views in common. This was purely ima
ginary, a half-humorous, half-poetical fiction of
Schumann's, existing only in the brain of its
founder, who thought it well fitted to give weight
to the expression of various views of art, which
were occasionally put forth as its utterances. The
idea betrays some poetic talent, since in this way
mere critical discussions gain the charm of drama
tic life. The characters which most usually ap
pear are Florestan and Eusebius, two personages
in whom Schumann endeavoured to embody the
two opposite sides of his nature. The vehement,
stormy, rough element is represented by Flores
tan; the gentler and more poetic one by Eusebius.
l 'Neue Bahneu,' New Paths, Oct. 28, 1853.
SCHUMANN.
These two figures are obviously imitated from
Vult and Walt in Jean Paul's ' Flegeljahre ' ;
indeed Schumann's literary work throughout is
strongly coloured with the manner of Jean Paul,
and frequent reference is made to his writings.
Now and then, as moderator between these an
tagonistic characters, who of course take opposite
views in criticism, ' Master Raro' comes in. In
him Schumann has conceived a character such as
at one time he had himself dreamed of becoming.
The explanation of the name ' Davidsbiindler ' is
given at the beginning of a 'Shrove Tuesday
discourse* by Florestan in the year 1835. 'The
hosts of David are youths and men destined to
slay all the Philistines, musical or other.' In the
college-slang of Germany the 'Philistine' is the
non-student, who is satisfied to live on in the ordi
nary routine of every-day life, or — which comes to
the same thing in the student's mind — the man of
narrow, sober, prosaic views, as contrasted with
the high-flown poetry and enthusiasm of the social
life of a German university. Thus, in the name of
Idealism, the ' Davidsbundler ' wage war against
boorish mediocrity, and when Schumann regarded
it as the function of his paper to aid in bringing in
a new 'poetical phase' in music he meant just this.
Though Schumann was himself the sole reality
in the ' Davidsbiindlerschaft,' he indulged his
fancy by introducing personages of his acquaint
ance whose agreement with his views he was
sure of. He quietly included all the principal
co-operators in the Zeitschrift, and even artists
such as Berlioz, whom he did not know, but in
whom he felt an interest, and was thus justi
fied in writing to A. von Zuccamaglio in 1836 : —
'By the Daridsbund is figured an intellectual
brotherhood which ramifies widely, and I hope
may bear golden fruit.' He brings in the bre
thren, who are not actually himself, from time
to time in the critical discussions ; and the
way in which he contrives to make this motley
troupe of romantic forms live and move before
the eyes of the reader is really quite magical.
He could say with justice : — ' We are now living
a romance the like of which has perhaps never
been written in any book.' We meet with a
Jonathan, who may perhaps stand for Schunke
(on another occasion however Schumann desig
nates himself by this name) ; a Fritz Friedrich,
probably meant for Lyser2 the painter, a lover
of music ; Serpentin is Carl Banck, a clever com
poser of songs, who at the outset was one of
his most zealous and meritorious fellow-workers ;
Gottschalk Wedel is Anton von Zuccamaglio,
then living in Warsaw, who had made a name
by his collection of German and foreign ' Volks-
lieder' ; Chiara is of course Clara Wieck, and
Zilia (apparently shortened from Cecilia) is pro
bably the same. Felix Mendelssohn appears
under the name of Felix Meritis, and the name
Walt occurs once (in 1836, 'Aus den Buchern
der Davidsbiindler,' ii. Tanzlitteratur). It can
not be asserted that any particular person was
meant, still his direct reference to Jean Pauls
2 Author of the sketch of Eeethoyen engraved at p. 170 of vol. i.
of this Dictionary.
SCHUMANN.
'Flegeljahre' is interesting. There is also a
certain Julius among the ' Davidsbiindler,' pro
bably Julius Knorr. The name occurs in Schu
mann's first essay on music, ' Ein opus ii.' This
is not included in the 'Neue Zeitschrift,' but
appears in No. 49 of the 'Allgemeine Musik-
alische Zeitung' for 1831 (then edited by Fink).
The editor has prefixed a note to the effect that
'it is by a young man, a pupil of the latest
school, who has given his name,' and contrasts
it with the anonymous work of a reviewer of the
old school discussing the same piece of music.
The contrast is indeed striking, and the imagin
ative flights of enthusiastic young genius look
strange enough among the old-world surround
ings of the rest of the paper.
Schumann placed this critique — which deals
with Chopin's variations on ' La ci darem ' — at
the beginning of his collected writings, which he
published towards the close of his life (' Gesam-
melte Schriften,' 4 vols. Georg Wigand, Leipzig,
1854). It is a good example of the tone which he
adopted in the ' Neue Zeitschrift.' His fellow-
workers fell more or less into the same key, not
from servility, but because they were all young
men, and because the reaction against the Phi
listine style of criticism was just then in the air.
This may be plainly detected, for instance, in a
critique written by Wieck for the periodical
called ' Cecilia,' on Chopin's airs with variations,
and which is indeed fanciful enough. Thus it
is easy to understand that the total novelty of
the style of writing of the 'Neue Zeitschrift'
should have attracted attention to music ; the
paper soon obtained a comparatively large cir
culation ; and as, besides the charm of novelty
and style, it offered a variety of instructive and
entertaining matter, and discussed important
subjects earnestly and cleverly, the interest of
the public was kept up, and indeed constantly
increased from year to year. The influence ex
erted by Schumann on musical art in Germany
through the medium of this paper, cannot but be
regarded as very important.
It has been sometimes said that Schumann's
literary labours must have done him mischief, by
taking up time and energy which might have been
better employed in composition. But this view
seems to me untenable. Up to the period at
which we have now arrived, Schumann, on his
own statement, had merely dreamed away his life
at the piano. His tendency to self-concentration,
his shyness, and his independent circumstances,
placed him in danger of never achieving that
perfect development of his powers which is pos
sible only by vigorous exercise. Now the editing
of a journal is an effectual remedy for dreaming ;
and when, at the beginning of 1835, he became
sole editor, however much he may have felt the
inexorable necessity of satisfying his readers week
after week, and of keeping his aim constantly in
view, it was no doubt a most beneficial exercise for
his will and energies. He was conscious of this,
or he certainly would not have clung to the paper
with such affection and persistency ; and it is a
matter of fact that the period of his happiest
SCHUMANN.
391
and most vigorous creativeness coincides pretty
nearly with that during which he was engaged
on the ' Zeitschrift.' Hence, to suppose that his
literary work was any drawback to his artistic
career is an error, though it is true that as he
gradually discovered the inexhaustible fertility of
his creative genius, he sometimes complained that
the details of an editor's work were a burthen
to him. Besides, the paper was the medium by
which Schumann was first brought into contact
and intercourse with the most illustrious artists
of his time ; and living as he did apart from all
the practically musical circles of Leipzig, it was
almost the only link between himself and the
contemporary world.
Nor must we overlook the fact that certain
peculiar gifts of Schumann's found expression in
his writings on musical subjects, gifts which would
otherwise scarcely have found room for display.
His poetic talent was probably neither rich
enough nor strong enough for the production of
large independent poems; but, on the other hand,
it was far too considerable to be condemned to
perpetual silence. In his essays and critiques,
which must be regarded rather as poetic flights
and sympathetic interpretations than as examples
of incisive analysis, his poetical gift found a
natural outlet, and literature is by so much the
richer for them. Nay, it is a not unreasonable
speculation whether, if his imaginative powers
had not found this vent they might not have
formed a disturbing and marring element in his
musical creations. Even as it is, poetical imagery
plays an important part in Schumann's music,
though without seriously overstepping the per
missible limits. This too we may safely say,
that in spite of his silent and self-contained
nature, there was in Schumann a vein of the
genuine agitator, in the best and noblest sense
of the word ; he was possessed by the convic
tion that the development of German art, then
in progress, had not yet come to its final term,
and that a new phase of its existence was at
hand. Throughout his writings we find this view
beautifully and poetically expressed, as for in
stance, ' Consciously or unconsciously a new and
as yet undeveloped school is being founded on
the basis of the Beethoven-Schubert romanticism,
a school which we may venture to expect will
mark a special epoch in the history of art. Its
destiny seems to be to usher in a period which
will nevertheless have many links to connect it
with the past century.' Or again : ' A rosy light
is dawning in the sky ; whence it cometh I know
not; but in any case, 0 youth, make for the light.'
To rouse fresh interest and make use of that
already existing for the advancement of this new
movement was one of his deepest instincts, and
this he largely accomplished by means of his
paper. From his pen we have articles on almost
all the most illustrious composers of his generation
— Mendelssohn, Taubert, Chopin, Hiller, Heller,
Henselt, Sterndale-Bennett, Gade, Kirchner, and
Franz, as well as Johannes Brahms, undoubtedly
the most remarkable composer of the generation
after Schumann. On some he first threw the
392
SCHUMANN.
light of intelligent and enthusiastic literary sym
pathy ; others he was actually the first to intro
duce to the musical world ; and even Berlioz, a
Frenchman, he eulogised boldly and successfully,
recognising in him a champion of the new idea.
By degrees he would naturally discern that he
had thus prepared the soil for the reception of
his own works. He felt himself in close affinity
with all these artists, and was more and more
confirmed in his conviction that he too had some
thing to say to the world that it had not heard
before. 'If you only knew,' he wrote in 1836
to Moscheles in London, ' how I feel, as though
I had reached but the lowest bough of the tree
of heaven ; and could hear overhead, in hours of
sacred loneliness, songs, some of which I may yet
reveal to those I love — you surely would not
deny me an encouraging word.' In the Zeit-
schrift he must have been aware that he con
trolled a power which would serve to open a
shorter route for his own musical productions.
' If the publisher were not afraid of the editor,
the world would hear nothing of me — perhaps to
the world's advantage. And yet the black heads
of the printed notes are very pleasant to behold.'
' To give up the paper would involve the loss
of all the reserve force which every artist ought
to have if he is to produce easily and freely.'
So he wrote in 1836 and 1837. But at the
same time we must emphatically contradict the
suggestion that Schumann used his paper for
selfish ends. His soul was too entirely noble and
his ideal aims too high to have any purpose in
view but the advancement of art ; and it was
only in so far as his own interests were insepar
able from those of his whole generation, that he
would ever have been capable of forwarding the
fortunes of his own works. The question even
whether, and in what manner, his own works
should be discussed in the Neue Zeitschrift he
always treated with the utmost tact. In one of
his letters he clearly expresses his principles on
the subject as follows : ' I am, to speak frankly,
too proud to attempt to influence Hartel through
Fink (editor of the 'Allgememe inus. Zeitung');
and I hate, at all times, any mode of instigating
public opinion by the artist himself. What is
strong enough works its own way.'
His efforts for the good cause indeed went
beyond essay-writing and composing. Extracts
from a note-book published by Wasielewski
prove that he busied himself with a variety of
plans for musical undertakings of general utility.
Thus he wished to compile lives of Beethoven
and of Bach, with a critique of all their works,
and a biographical dictionary of living musicians,
on the same plan. He desired that the relations
of operatic composers and managers should be
regulated by law. He wished to establish an
agency for the publication of musical works, so
that composers might derive greater benefit from
their publications, and gave his mind to a plan
for founding a Musical Union in Saxony, with
Leipzig as its head-quarters, to be the counter
part of Schilling's National German Union
^Deutscheu National Verein fiir Musik).
SCHUMANN.
In the first period of his editorship, before he
had got into the way of easily mastering his day's
labour, and when the regular round of work had
still the charm of novelty, it was of course only
now and then that he had leisure, or felt in
the mood, for composing. Two great pianoforte
works date from 1834 C^6 'Carnaval,' op. 9, and
the ' Etudes Symphoniques,' op. 13), but in 1835
nothing was completed. After this, however,
Schumann's genius began again to assert itself,
and in the years 1836 to 1839 he composed that
splendid set of pianoforte works of the highest
excellence, on which a considerable part of his
fame rests ; viz. the great Fantasia (op. r 7), the
F minor Sonata (op. 14), Fantasiestiicke (op. 12),
Davidsbiindlertanze, Novelletten, Kinderscenen,
Kreisleriana, Huinoreske, Faschingsschwank, Eo-
manzen, and others. The fount of his creative
genius flowed forth ever clearer and more abund
antly. 'I used to rack my brains for a long time,'
writes he on March 15, 1839, ' but now I scarcely
ever scratch out a note. It all comes from within,
and I often feel as if I could go playing straight
on without ever coming to an end.' The in
fluence of Schumann the author on Schumann
the composer may often be detected. Thus
the ' Davidsbiindler' come into his music, and
the composition which bears their name was
originally entitled < Davidsbiindler dances for
the Pianoforte, dedicated to Walther von Goethe
by Florestan and Eusebius.' The title of the
Fj minor Sonata, op. n, which was completed
in 1835, runs thus: ' Pianoforte Sonata. Dedi
cated to Clara by Florestan and Eusebius.' In
the ' Carnaval,' a set of separate and shorter
pieces with a title to each, the names of Flores
tan and Eusebius occur again, as do those of
Chiarina (the diminutive of Clara), and Chopin ;
the whole concluding with a march of the Davids
biindler against the Philistines.
The reception of Schumann's works by the
critics was most favourable and encouraging, but
the public was repelled by their eccentricity and
originality ; and it was not till after the iippear-
ance of the 'Kinderscenen' (1839) that they
began to be appreciated. Ops. I and 2 actually
had the honour of a notice in the Vienna ' Musik-
alische Zeitung' of 1832, by no less a person
than Grillparzer the poet. Fink designedly took
hardly any notice of Schumann in the ' Allge-
meine musikalische Zeitung.' But Liszt wrote
a long, discriminating, and very favourable article
in the 'Gazette Musicale' of 1837 upon the Im
promptus (op. 5), and the Sonatas in Fjf minor
and F minor. Moscheles wrote very sympatheti
cally on the two sonatas in the ' Neue Zeitschrift
fur Musik' itself (vols 5 and 6), and some kind
words of recognition of Schumann's genius were
published subsequently from his diary (Mosche-
les's 'Leben,' Leipzig, 1873, vol. ii. p. 15; English
translation by A. L\ Coleridge, vol. ii. p. 19*
20). Other musicians, though not expressing
their sentiments publicly, continued to hold aloof
from him. Hauptmann at that time calls Schu
mann's pianoforte compositions ' pretty and
curious little things, all wanting in proper
SCHUMANN.
solidity, but otherwise interesting.' (See Haupt-
mann's Letters to Hauser, Leipzig, 1871, vol. i.
p. 255.)
In October 1835 the musical world of Leipzig
was enriched by the arrival of Mendelssohn. It
was already in a flourishing state : operas, con
certs, and sacred performances alike were of great
excellence, and well supported by the public.
But although the soil was well prepared before
Mendelssohn's arrival, it was he who raised
Leipzig to the position of the most musical town
of Germany. The extraordinarily vigorous life
that at once grew up there under the influence
of his genius, drawing to itself from far and near
the most important musical talent of the country,
has shown itself to be of so enduring a character
that even at the present day its influences are
felt. Schumann too, who had long felt great
respect for Mendelssohn, was drawn into his
circle. On Oct. 4, 1835, Mendelssohn conducted
his first concert in the Gewandhaus; the day
before this there was a musical gathering at
the Wiecks', at which both Mendelssohn and
Schumann were present, and it seems to have
been on this occasion that the two greatest
musicians of their time first came into close
personal intercourse. (Moscheles's 'Leben,' i.
301; English translation, i. 322.) On Oct. 5,
Mendelssohn, Schumann, Moscheles, Banck, and
a few others, dined together. In the afternoon
of the 6th there was again music at Wieck's
house; Moscheles, Clara Wieck, and L. Rake-
mann from Bremen, played Bach's D minor
Concerto for three claviers, Mendelssohn putting
in the orchestral accompaniments on a fourth
piano. Schumann, who was also present, writes
in the 'Zeitschrift,' 'It was splendid to listen to.'
Moscheles had come over from Hamburg, where
he was staying on a visit, to give a concert in
Leipzig. Schumann had already been in corre
spondence with him, but this was the first oppor
tunity he had enjoyed of making the personal
acquaintance of the man whose playing had so
delighted him in Carlsbad when a boy of 9.
Moscheles describes him as 'a retiring but in
teresting young man,' and the Ffl minor Sonata,
played to him by Clara Wieck, as ' very laboured,
difficult, and somewhat intricate, although in
teresting.'
A livelier intimacy, so far as Schumann was
concerned, soon sprang up between him and
Mendelssohn. When Mendelssohn had to go to
Diisseldorf in May 1836, to the first performance
of ' St. Paul ' at the Niederrheinische Musikfest,
Schumann even intended to go with him, and vras
ready months beforehand, though when the time
arrived he was prevented from going. They used
to like to dine together, and gradually an in
teresting little circle was formed around them,
including among others Ferdinand David, whom
Mendelssohn had brought to Leipzig as leader of
his orchestra. In the early part of January 1837
Mendelssohn and Schumann used in this way to
meet every day and interchange ideas, so far as
Schumann's silent temperament would allow.
Subsequently when Mendelssohn was kept more
SCHUMANN.
393
at home by his marriage, this intercourse became
rarer. Schumann was by nature unsociable,
and at this time there were outward circum
stances which rendered solitude doubly attractive
to him. Ferdinand Hiller, who spent the winter
of 1839-40 in Leipzig with Mendelssohn, relates
that Schumann was at that time living the life
of a recluse and scarcely ever came out of hia
room. Mendelssohn and Schumann felt them
selves drawn together by mutual appreciation.
The artistic relations between the two great men
were not as yet, however, thoroughly reciprocal.
Schumann admired Mendelssohn to the point
of enthusiasm. He declared him to be the best
musician then living, said that he looked up to
him as to a high mountain-peak, and that even
in his daily talk about art some thought at least
would be uttered worthy of being graven in
gold. And when he mentions him in his writ
ings, it is in a tone of enthusiastic admiration,
which shows in the best light Schumann's fine
ideal character, so remarkable for its freedom
from envy. And his opinion remained unaltered :
in 1842 he dedicated his three string quartets to
Mendelssohn, and in the 'Album fur die Jugend'
there is a little piano piece called 'Erinnerung,'
dated Nov. 4, 1847, which shows with eloquent
simplicity how deeply he felt the early death of
his friend. It is well known how he would be
moved out of his quiet stillness if he heard any
disparaging expression used of Mendelssohn.
Mendelssohn, on the contrary, at first only saw
in Schumann the man of letters and the art-
critic. Like most productive musicians, he had
a dislike to such men as a class, however much
he might love and value single representatives,
as was really the case with regard to Schumann.
From this point of view must be regarded the
expressions which he makes use of now and then
in letters concerning Schumann as an author.
(See Mendelssohn's 'Briefe,' ii. 116; Lady Wal
lace's translation ii. 97 j1 and Hiller's 'Felix
Mendelssohn Bartholdy,' Cologne, 1878, p. 64.)
If they sound somewhat disparaging, we must
remember that it is not the personal Mendelssohn
speaking against the personal Schumann, but
rather the creative artist speaking against the
critic, always in natural opposition to him. In
deed it is obviously impossible to take such
remarks in a disadvantageous sense, as Schu
mann quite agreed with Mendelssohn on the
subject of criticism. One passage in his writings
is especially remarkable in this respect. He is
speaking of Chopin's pianoforte concerto, and
Florestan exclaims ' What is a whole year of a
musical paper compared to a concerto by Cho
pin? What is a magister's rage compared to
the poetic frenzy ? What are ten complimentary
addresses to the editor compared to the Adagio
in the second Concerto ? And believe me, David-
ites, I should not think you worth the trouble of
talking to, did I not believe you capable of com
posing such works as those you write about, with
the exception of a few like this concerto. Away
i Hardly recognisable, owing to ' Die musikalische Zeitung" (Schu
mann's Paper; being rendered ' The musical papers.'
394
SCHUMANN.
with your musical journals ! It should be the
highest endeavour of a just critic to render him
self wholly unnecessary ; the best discourse on
music is silence. Why write about Chopin ?
Why not create at first hand — play, write, and
compose?' ('Gesammelte Schriften,' i. 276;
Engl. trans, in 'Music and Musicians,' series i.
p. 205.) True, this impassioned outburst has
to be moderated by Eusebius. But consider the
significance of Schumann's writing thus in his
own journal about the critic's vocation ! It plainly
shows that he only took it up as an artist, and
occasionally despised it. But with regard to
Schumann's place in art, Mendelssohn did not, at
that time at all events, consider it a very high
one, and lie was not alone in this opinion. It
was shared, for example, by Spohr and Haupt-
mann. In Mendelssohn's published letters there
is no verdict whatever on Schumann's music.
The fact however remains that in Schumann's
earlier pianoforte works he felt that the power
or the desire for expression in the greater forms
was wanting, and this he said in conversation.
He soon had reason to change his opinion, and
afterwards expressed warm, interest in his friend's
compositions. Whether he ever quite entered into
the individualities of Schumann's music may well
be doubted ; their natures were too dissimilar. To
a certain extent the German nation has recovered
from one mistake in judgment; the tendency
to elevate Schumann above Mendelssohn was for
a very long time unmistakable. Latterly their
verdict has become more just, and the two are
now recognised as composers of equal greatness.
Schumann's constant intimacy in Wieck's
house had resulted in a tender attachment to his
daughter Clara, now grown up. So far as we
know it was in the spring of 1836 that this first
found any definite expression. His regard was
reciprocated, and in the summer of the following
year he preferred his suit formally to her father.
Wieck however did not favour it ; possibly he
entertained loftier hopes for his gifted daughter.
At any rate he was of opinion that Schumann's
means and prospects were too vague and un
certain to warrant his setting up a home of his
own. Schumann seems to have acknowledged
the justice of this hesitation, for in 1838 he made
strenuous efforts to find a new and wider sphere
of work. With the full consent of Clara Wieck
he decided on settling in Vienna, and bringing
out his musical periodical in that city. The glory
of a great epoch still cast a light over the musical
life of the Austrian capital — the epoch when
Gluck, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven and Schu
bert were living and working there. In point of
fact, all genuine music had vanished even during
Beethoven's lifetime, and had given way to a
trivial and superficial taste. Rossini and his fol
lowers were paramount in opera; in orchestral
music there were the waltzes of Strauss and
Lanner ; and in vocal music the feeble senti
mentalities of Proch and his fellow-composers.
So far as solo playing was concerned, the fourth
decade of the century saw it at its highest pitch
of executive brilliancy, and its lowest of pur-
SCHUMANN.
pose and feeling — indeed it may be comprehen
sively designated as the epoch of Thalberg.
Thus Schumann would have found in Vienna
ample opportunity for doing good work, for the
Viennese public was still as ever the most re
sponsive in the world, and one to justify sanguine
hopes. Schumann effected his move with the
assistance of Professor Joseph Fischhof, his col
league in the paper ; settling himself in Oct.
1838 in the Schb'nlaterngasse, No. 679. Oswald
Lorenz edited the ' Zeitschrift ' as Schumann's
deputy, and for a time it was still to be issued
in Leipzig. Schumann hoped to be able to bring
it out in Vienna by Jan. 1839, an(^ made every
effort to obtain the prompt permission of the
authorities, as well as the support of influential
persons for himself and his journal. But the
consent of the censor's office and the police
were long withheld ; and he was required to
secure the co-operation of an Austrian publisher,
in itself a great difficulty. It is hard to believe
that in the great city of Vienna no strictly
musical newspaper then existed, and that a small
catalogue, the 'Allgemeine musikalischer An-
zeiger,' published weekly by Tobias Haslinger,
and almost exclusively devoted to the business
interests of his firm, was the only publication
which could pretend to the name. But the pub
lishers were either too indolent or too timid to
attempt any new enterprise, and sought to throw
impediments in Schumann's way.
His courage and hopefulness were soon much
reduced. The superficially kind welcome he met
everywhere could not conceal the petty strife of
coteries, the party spirit and gossip of a society
which might have been provincial. The pub
lic, though keenly alive to music, was devoid
of all critical taste. 'He could not get on with
these people,' he writes to Zuccamaglio as early
as Oct. 19, 1838 ; their utter insipidity was at
times too much for him, and while he had hoped
that on its appearance in Vienna the ' Zeitschriffc'
would have received a fresh impulse, and become
a medium of intercourse between North and
South, he was forced as early as December to
say : ' The paper is evidently falling off, though
it must be published here ; this vexes me much.'
Sterndale Bennett, who was residing in Leipzig
during 1837-8, and who, Schumann hoped, would
settle with him inVienna, was obliged to relinquish
his intention ; and in Vienna itself he sought in
vain for an artist after his own heart, 'one who
should not merely play tolerably well on one or
two instruments, but who should be a wholcman,
and understand Shakespeare and Jean Paul.'
At the same time he did not abandon the scheme
of making a wide and influential circle of activity
for himself; he was unwilling to return to Leipzig,
and when in March 1 839 he made up his mind to
do so, after trying in vain to carry on the journal
in Vienna, it was with the intention of remaining
there but a short time. He indulged in a dream
of going to England never to return ! What the
anticipations could have been that led him to
cherish such an idea we know not ; perhaps his
friendship for Bennett may have led to it ; but,
SCHUMANN.
in point of fact, he never set foot on English
ground.
As far, therefore, as making a home for himself
went, his half-year's stay in Vienna was without
result. But without doubt Schumann received
impulses and incitements towards further pro
gress as a musician through his acquaintance
with Vienna life. A work which is to be re
ferred directly to this influence is the ' Fasch-
ingsschwank aus Wien' (op. 26, published by
Spina in 1841). In the first movement, which
seems to depict various scenes of a masquerade,
there springs up quite unnoticed the melody of
the 'Marseillaise' (p. 7, bar 40 etc.; Pauer's
edition, vol. iii. p. 596, 1. i), at that time strictly
forbidden in Vienna. Schumann, who had been
much worried by the government officials on ac
count of his newspaper, took this opportunity of
playing off a good-tempered joke upon them.
It was very natural that, with his enthusiastic
admiration for Schubert, he should take pains to
follow out the traces of that master, who had now
been dead just ten years. He visited the Wahring
cemetery, where Schubert is buried, divided by a
few intervening graves from Beethoven. On the
tomb of the latter a steel pen was lying ; this
Schumann took possession of, and being always
fond of symbolical associations and mystic con
nections, used on very special occasions. With it
he wrote his Symphony in Bb (op. 38), and the
notice of Schubert's C major Symphony, which is
found in the ' Zeitschrift ' for 1840^ And here
we encounter one of the chief benefits which
Schumann received from his stay in Vienna. He
visited Franz Schubert's brother Ferdinand, who
showed him the artistic remains of his too early
lost brother, and among them the score of the
C major Symphony. This he had composed in
March 1828, but never lived to hear it performed
entire, and no one had since cared to take any
trouble about it. Schumann arranged for the
score to be sent to Leipzig, and there on March 2 1,
1839, it was performed for the first time under
Mendelssohn's direction. Its success was very
striking, and was of great influence on the more
thorouq-h and widespread appreciation of Schu
bert's genius. Schumann retained pleasant me
mories of Vienna throughout his life, in spite
of the little notice he attracted on this occasion,
and the meagre success of a concert consisting of
his own works, which he gave with his wife on
a subsequent visit in the winter of 1846. In
the summer of 1847 he even wished to apply for
a vacant post on the board of direction at the
Conservatorium, but when the year 1 848 came,
he was extremely glad that the plan had come to
nothing.
At the beginning of April 1859 Schumann
returned to his old life in Leipzig. He devoted
himself with new zest to the interests of the
journal, and delighted in once more being asso
ciated with prominent and sympathetic musi
cians. In the summer he paid a short visit to
Berlin, which pleased and interested him from
its contrast to Vienna.
1 See also the ' Gesammelte Schriften,' Iii. 195.
SCHUMANN.
395
Unfortunately Wieck's opinion as to the
match between Schumann and his daughter
remained unchanged, and his opposition to it
became even stronger and more firmly rooted.
Since persuasion was unavailing, Schumann
was forced to call in the assistance of the law,
and Wieck had to account for his refusal
in court. The case dragged on for a whole
year, but the final result was that Wieck's ob
jections to the marriage were pronounced to be
trivial and without foundation. A sensitive na
ture such as Schumann's must have been deeply
pained by these difficulties, and the long-delayed
decision must have kept him in disastrous sus
pense. His letters show signs of this. For the
rest, his outward circumstances had so much
improved, that he could easily afford to make
a home without the necessity of such a round
of work as he had attempted in Vienna. * We
are young,' he writes on Feb. 19, 1840, 'and
have hands, strength, and reputation ; and I
have a little property that brings in 500 thalers
a year. The profits of the paper amount to as
much again, and I shall get well paid for
my compositions. Tell me now if there can
be real cause for fear.' One thing alone made
him pause for a time. His bride-elect was de
corated with different titles of honour from the
courts at which she had played in her concert-
tours. He himself had, it is true, been latterly
made a member of several musical societies, but
that was not enough. In the beginning of 1 840
he executed a scheme which he had cherished
since 1838, and applied to the university of Jena
for the title of Doctor of Philosophy. Several
cases in which the German universities had
granted the doctor's diploma to musicians had
lately come under Schumann's notice ; for in
stance the university of Leipzig had given the
honorary degree to Marschner in 1835, and to
Mendelssohn in 1836, and these may have sug
gested the idea to him. Schumann received the
desired diploma on Feb. 24, 1840. As he had
wished, the reason assigned for its bestowal is
his well-known activity not only as a critical
and aesthetic writer, but as a creative musician.2
At last, after a year of suspense, doubts, and
disagreements, the marriage of Robert Schumann
with Clara Wieck took place on Sept. 12, 1840,
in the church of Schonefeld, near Leipzig.
The 'Davidsbiindlertanze,' previously men
tioned, bore on the title-page of the first edition
an old verse —
In all und jeder Zeit
Yerknupft sich Lust und Leid :
Bliibt frprum in Lust, und seyd
Beim Leid mit Muth bereit ;
which may be rendered as follows : —
Hand in hand we always see
Joy allied to misery:
In rejoicing pious be,
And bear your woes with bravery.
And when we observe that the two first bars
2 Qui rerum Musis sacrarum et artifex ingeniosus et judex elegang
modis musici's ium scite componendis turn docle judicandis atqve pra>-
ceptis de sensu pulchritudinis venustalisque optimis colendis magnam
nominisfamam adeptus est, says the original in its flowery Latin.
396
SCHUMANN.
of the first piece are borrowed from a com
position by Clara Wieck (op. 6, no. 5), we under
stand the allusion. Schumann himself admits
that his compositions for the piano written during
the period of his courtship reveal much of his
personal experience and feelings, and his crea
tive work in 1840 is of a very striking charac
ter. Up to this time, with the exception of the
Symphony in G minor, which has remained un
known, he had written only for the piano ; now
he suddenly threw himself into vocal composi
tion, and the stream of his invention rushed at
once into this new channel with such force that
in that single year he wrote above one hundred
songs. Nor was it in number alone, but in intrin
sic value also, that in this department the work
of this year was the most remarkable of all Schu
mann's life. It is not improbable that his stay in
Vienna had some share in this sudden rush into
song, and in opening Schumann's mind to the
charms of pure melody. But still, when we look
through the words of his songs, it is clear that
here more than anywhere, love was the prompter
— love that had endured so long a struggle, and at
last attained the goal of its desires. This is con
firmed by the ' Myrthen ' (op. 25), which he dedi
cated to the lady of his choice, and the twelve
songs from Riickert's ' Liebesfriihling ' — Spring
time of Love — (op. 37), which were written con
jointly by the two lovers. ' I am now writing
nothing but songs great and small,' he says to a
friend on Feb. 19, 1840 ; ' I can hardly tell you
how delightful it is to write for the voice as
compared with instrumental composition, and
what a stir and tumult I feel within me when I
sit down to it. I have brought forth quite new
things in this line.' With the close of 1 840 he felt
that he had worked out the vein of expression in
the form of song with pianoforte accompaniment,
almost to perfection. Some one expressed a hope
that after such a beginning a promising future
lay before him as a song-writer, but Schumann
answered, 'I cannot venture to promise that I
shall produce anything further in the way of
songs, and I am satisfied with what I have done.'
And he was right in his firm opinion as to the
peculiar character of this form of music. ' In
your essay on song-writing,' he says to a col
league in the ' Zeitschrift,' ' it has somewhat dis
tressed me that you should have placed me in the
second rank. I do not ask to stand in the first,
but I think I have some pretensions to a place
of my own.'
As far as anything human can be, the marriage
was perfectly happy. Besides their genius, both
husband and wife had simple domestic tastes,
and were strong enough to bear the admiration
of the world without becoming egotistical. They
lived for one another, and for their children.
He created and wrote for his wife, and in ac
cordance with her temperament ; while she
looked upon it as her highest privilege to give
to the world the most perfect interpretation of
his works, or at least to stand as mediatrix
between him and his audience, and to ward off
all disturbing or injurious impressions from his
SCHUMANN.
sensitive soul, which day by day became more
and more irritable. Now that he found perfect
contentment in his domestic relations, he with
drew more than ever from intercourse with
others, and devoted himself exclusively to his
family and his work. The deep joy of his
married life produced the direct result of a
mighty advance in his artistic progress. Schu
mann's most beautiful works in the larger forms
date almost exclusively from the years 1841-5.
In 1841 he turned his attention to the Sym
phony, as he had done in the previous year to the
Song, and composed in this year alone, no fewer
than three symphonic works. The Bb Symphony
(op. 38) was performed as early as March 31,
1841, at a concert given by Clara Schumann in
the Gewandhaus at Leipzig. Mendelssohn con
ducted it, and performed the task with so much
zeal and care as truly to delight his friend. The
other two orchestral works were given at a con
cert on Dec. 6 of the same year, but did not
meet with so much success as the former one.
Schumann thought that the two together were
too much at once; and they had not the ad
vantage of Mendelssohn's able and careful direc
tion, for he was spending that winter in Berlin.
Schumann put these two works away for a time,
and published the Bb Symphony alone. The
proper title of one of these was ' Symphonistische
Phantasie,' but it was performed under the title
of 'Second Symphony,' and, in 1851, the instru
mentation having been revised and completed,
was published as the 4th Symphony (D minor,
op. 120). The other was brought out under an
altered arrangement, which he made in 1845, with
the title ' Ouverture, Scherzo, et Finale' (op. 52);
and it is said that Schumann originally intended
to call it ' Sinfonietta.' Beside these orchestral
works the first movement of the Pianoforte Con
certo in A minor was written in 1841. It was
at first intended to form an independent piece
with the title of 'Fantasie.' As appears from
a letter of Schumann's to David, it was once
rehearsed by the Gewandhaus orchestra in the
winter of 1841-2. Schumann did not write the
last two movements which complete the concerto
until 1845.
The year 1842 was devoted to chamber music.
The three string quartets deserve to be first
mentioned, since the date of their composition
can be fixed with the greatest certainty. Al
though. Schumann was unused to this style of
writing, he composed the quartets in about a
month — a certain sign that his faculties were
as clear as his imagination was rich. In the
autograph,1 after most of the movements is written
the date of their completion. The Adagio of
the first quartet bears the date June 21, 42 ;
the finale was ' finished on St. John's day, June
24, 1842, in Leipzig.' In the second quartet
the second movement is dated July 2, 1842,
and the last July 5, 1842, Leipzig. The third
is dated as follows : first movement July 18,
second July 20, third July 21, and the fourth
1 Now in the possession of Herr Eaymund HSrtel, of Leipzig.
SCHUMANN.
Leipzig, July 22, all of the same year. Thus the
two last movements took the composer only one
day each. These quartets, which are dedicated
to Mendelssohn, were at once taken up by the
Leipzig musicians with great interest. The praise
bestowed upon them by Ferdinand David called
forth a letter from Schumann, addressed to him,
which merits quotation, as showing how modest
and how ideal as an artist Schumann was : —
' Hartel told me how very kindly you had spoken
to him about my quartets, and, coming from you,
it gratified me exceedingly. But I shall have
to do better yet, and I feel, with each new work,
as if I ought to begin all over again from the
beginning.' In the beginning of October of this
year the quartets were played at David's house ;
Hauptmann was present, and expressed his sur
prise at Schumann's talent, which, judging only
from the earlier pianoforte works, he had fancied
not nearly so great. With each new work Schu
mann now made more triumphant way — at all
events in Leipzig. The same year witnessed the
production of that work to which he chiefly
owes his fame throughout Europe — the Quintet
for Pianoforte and Strings (op. 44). The first
public performance took place in the Gewandhaus
on Jan. 8, 1843, his wife, to whom it is dedicated,
taking the pianoforte part. Berlioz, who came to
Leipzig in 1843, and there made Schumann's per
sonal acquaintance, heard the quintet performed,
and carried the fame of it to Paris. Besides the
quintet, Schumann wrote, in 1842, the Pianoforte
Quartet (op. 47) and a pianoforte Trio. The
trio, however, remained unpublished for eight
years, and then appeared as op. 88, under the
title of ' Phantasiestiicke for Pianoforte, Violin,
and Violoncello.' The quartet too was laid aside
for a time ; it was first publicly performed on
Dec. 8, 1844, by Madame Schumann, in the
Gewandhaus, David of course taking the violin
part, and Niels W. Gade, who was directing the
G-evvaudhaus concerts that winter, playing the
viola.
With the year 1843 came a total change of
style. The first works to appear were the Va
riations for two pianos (op. 46), which are now
so popular, and to which Mendelssohn may have
done some service by introducing them to the
public, in company with Madame Schumann, on
Aug. 19, 1843. The principal work of the year,
however, was ' Paradise and the Peri,' a grand
composition for solo- voices, chorus, and orchestra,
to a text adapted from Moore's 'Lalla Kookh.'
The enthusiasm created by this work at its first
performance (Dec. 4, 1843), conducted by the
composer himself, was so great that it had to be
repeated a week afterwards, on Dec. n, and on
the 23rd of the same month it was performed in
the Opera House at Dresden. It will be easily
believed that from this time Schumann's fame
was firmly established in Germany, although it
took twenty years more to make his work widely
and actually popular. Having been so fortunate
in his first attempt in a branch of art hitherto
untried by him, he felt induced to undertake
another work of the same kind, and in 1844
SCHUMANN.
397
began writing the second of his two most im
portant choral works, namely, the music to
Goethe's 'Faust.' For some time however the
work consisted only of four numbers. His uninter
rupted labours had so affected his health, that in
this year he was obliged for a time to forego all
exertion of the kind.
The first four years of his married life were
passed in profound retirement, but very rarely
interrupted. In the beginning of 1842 he ac
companied his wife on a concert-tour to Ham
burg, where the Bb Symphony was performed.
Madame Schumann then proceeded alone to Co
penhagen, while her husband returned to his
quiet retreat at Leipzig. In the summer of the
same year the two artists made an excursion
into Bohemia, and at Konigswart were presented
to Prince Metternich, who invited them to Vienna.
Schumann at first took some pleasure in these
tours, but soon forgot it in the peace and com
fort of domestic life, and it cost his wife great
' trouble to induce him to make a longer journey to
Russia in the beginning of 1 844. Indeed she only
succeeded by declaring that she would make the
tour alone if he would not leave home. ' How
unwilling I am to move out of my quiet round,'
he wrote to a friend, 'you must not expect me
to tell you. I cannot think of it without the
greatest annoyance.' However, he made up his
mind to it, and they started on Jan. 26. His
wife gave concerts in Mitau, Riga, Petersburg
and Moscow; and the enthusiasm with which
she was everywhere received attracted fresh at
tention to Schumann's works, the constant aim of
her noble endeavours. Schumann himself, when
once he had parted from home, found much to
enjoy in a journey which was so decidedly and
even brilliantly successful. At St. Petersburg
he was received with undiminished cordiality by
his old friend Henselt, who had made himself a
new home there. At a soire'e at Prince Olden
burg's Henselt played with Madame Schumann
her husband's Variations for two pianos. The
Bb Symphony was also performed under Schu
mann's direction at a soiree given by the Counts
Joseph and Michael Wielhorsky, highly esteemed
musical connoisseurs ; and it is evident that the
dedication of Schumann's PF. Quartet (op. 47)
to a Count Wielhorsky was directly connected
with this visit.
In June they were once more in Leipzig, and
so agreeable were the reminiscences of the jour
ney that Schumann was ready at once with a
fresh plan of the same kind — this time for a visit
to England with his wife in the following year ;
not, indeed, as he had once intended, with a
view to permanent residence, but merely that she
might win fresh laurels as a player, and he make
himself known as a composer. He proposed to
conduct parts of 'Paradise and the Peri' in
London, and anticipated a particular success for
it because the work ' had as it were sprung from
English soil, and was one of the sweetest flowers
of English verse.' On June 27, 1844, he writes
to Moscheles concerning the project, which had
the full support of Mendelssohn ; but the scheme
398
SCHUMANN.
ultimately came to nothing, chiefly because of
the refusal of Buxton, the proprietor of the
publishing firm of Ewer & Co., to bring out
4 Paradise and the Peri ' with English words.
Still Schumann, even long after, kept his eye
steadily fixed on England. He was delighted
at being told that Queen Victoria often listened
to his music, and had had the Bb Symphony1
played by the private band at Windsor, and he
contemplated dedicating his Manfred music (op.
115) to Her Majesty, but the idea was given up.
Instead of going to England, they at length paid
a visit to Vienna in the winter of 1 846. Here
again Schumann conducted his Bb Symphony,
and his wife played his Pianoforte Concerto. This
was on Jan. I, 1847. But the public were per
fectly unsympathetic, and justified an earlier
utterance of Schumann's that 'The Viennese are
an ignorant people and know little of what goes
on outside their own city.' Nor were matters
much more satisfactory in Berlin, whither they
went from Vienna to conduct ' Paradise and the
Peri ' ; while in Prague, where they performed on
their way, they met with the warmest reception.
The year 1844 was the ^as* °* Schumann's
residence in Leipzig ; for in October he left
the town where he had lived and worked with
short intervals for fourteen years, and moved
to Dresden. He had given up the editorship of
the ' Neue Zeitschrift ' in July, and from April
3, 1843, had held a Professor's chair in the Con-
servatorium, founded at Leipzig by Mendels
sohn's exertions, and opened on that date. [See
vol. ii. 115, 281 a, 282a.] He was professor of
pianoforte-playing and composition ; but his
reserved nature was little suited to the duties
of a teacher, though his name and the example
afforded by his work were no doubt highly ad
vantageous to the infant Institution. Schumann
had no disciples, properly speaking, either in the
Conservatorium or as private pupils. In a letter
to David from Dresden he incidentally men
tions Carl fritter as having instruction from
him, and as having previously been a pupil
of Hiller's ; and he writes to Hiller that he has
brought young Putter on a little. But what the
style of Schumann's teaching may have been
cannot be told ; and a single exception only
proves the rule.
The move to Dresden seems to have been
chiefly on account of Schumann's suffering con
dition. His nervous affection rendered change
of scene absolutely necessary to divert his
thoughts. He had overworked himself into a
kind of surfeit of music, so much so that his
medical attendant forbade his continually hear
ing it. In the musical world of Leipzig such
a prohibition could not be strictly obeyed, but
at Dresden it was quite different. ' Here,'
he writes to David on Nov. 25, 1844, 'one
can get back the old lost longing for music,
there is so little to hear ! It just suits my con
dition, for I still suffer very much from my
nerves, and everything affects and exhausts
i The first performance of the Bb Symphony in England was at the
Philharmonic Concert, June 5, 1854.
SCHUMANN.
me directly.' Accordingly he at first lived in
Dresden in the strictest seclusion. A friend
sought him out there and found him so changed
that he entertained grave fears for his life.
On several occasions he tried sea-bathing, but
it was long before his health can be said to
have radically improved. In February, 1846,
after a slight improvement, he again became very
unwell, as he did also in the summer of the
following year. He observed that he was unable
to remember the melodies that occurred to him
when composing ; the effort of invention fatiguing
his mind to such a degree as to impair his
memory. As soon as a lasting improvement
took place in his health, he again devoted himself
wholly to composition. He was now attracted
more powerfully than before to complicated con
trapuntal forms. The 'Studies' and ' Sketches '
for the pedal-piano (ops. 56 and 58), the six fugues
on the name of 'Bach' (op. 60), and the four piano
fugues (op. 72), owe their existence to this attrac
tion. The greatest work of the years 1845-6 how
ever, was the C major Symphony (op. 61), which
Mendelssohn produced at the Gewandhaus in
Leipzig, Nov. 5, 1846. Slight intercourse with a
few congenial spirits was now gradually resumed.
Among those whom he saw was the widow of
C. M. v. Weber (the 'Lina' of Weber's letters),
whose fine musical feeling was highly valued by
Schumann. The first year in Dresden was spent
with Ferdinand Hiller, who had been living there
since the winter of 1844. Their intercourse gra
dually grew into a lively and lasting intimacy.
When Hiller was getting up subscription concerts
in the autumn of 1845, Schumann took an active
share in the undertaking. With Richard Wagner,
too, then Capellmeister at Dresden, he was on
friendly terms. He was much interested in the
opera of Tannhauser, and heard it often, express
ing his opinion of it in terms of great though
not unqualified praise.2 But the natures of
the two musicians differed too widely to allow
of any real sympathy between them. Wagner
was always lively, versatile and talkative, while,
since Schumann's illness, his former silence and
reserve had increased, and even intimate friends,
like Moscheles and Lipinski, had to lament that
conversation with him was now scarcely possible.
At the end of Schumann's collected works we
find a ' Theater buchlein ' (1847-50) in which are
given short notes of the impressions made upon
him by certain operas. From this we learn that
in 1 84 7 he went comparatively of ten to the theatre;
the reason being that at that time he himself
was composing an opera. He had long cherished
the idea. So early as Sept. I, 1842, he writes,
' Do you know what is my morning and evening
prayer as an artist? German Opera. There is a field
for work.' He concludes a critique of an opera,
by Heinrich Esser in the number of the 'Zeit
schrift' for September 1842 with these significant
words, — ' It is high time that German composers
should give the lie to the reproach that has long
lain on them of having been so craven as to leave
2 See the entry under Aug. 7, 1847—' Were he as melodious as he is
intellectual (geisireich) he would be the man of the age.'
SCHUMANN.
the field in possession of the Italians and French.
But under this head there is a word to be said to
the German poets also.' In 1844 ^e composed a
chorus and an aria for an opera on Byron's poem
of the Corsair. The work however went no
farther, and the two pieces still remain unpub
lished. He also corresponded with his friend
Zuccalmaglio as to the subject for an opera,
which he wished to find ready on his return from
Bussia; and made, notes on more than twenty
different subjects of all kinds, periods and
nationalities; but none of these were found
suitable, and circumstances led to the abandon
ment of the project. At length, in 1847, he
decided on the legend of Ste. Genevieve. The
two versions of the story contained in the
tragedies of Tieck and Hebbel (principally that
of Hebbel) were to serve as the basis of the
text. The treatment of the words he persuaded
Robert Reinick, the poet, who had been living
in Dresden since 1844, to undertake. Reinick
however failed to satisfy him, and Hebbel, who
came to Dresden at the end of July 1847, could
not say that he thought it a satisfactory text,
though he declined to assist in remedying the
deficiencies and bringing it into the desired
form. This however was from no lack of interest
in Schumann himself. On the contrary Hebbel
always preserved the highest esteem for him,
and subsequently dedicated to him his drama
of ' Michel Angelo,' accepting in return from
Schumann the dedication of his 'Nachtlied'
(op. 1 08). But it was repugnant to him to see
his work mutilated in the way which Schumann
considered necessary for an opera. The com
poser was at last obliged to trust to his own
poetic powers and construct a text himself from
those already mentioned.
By August 1848 the music for the opera
was so far complete that Schumann thought he
might take steps for its performance. His first
thought was of the theatre at Leipzig, where he
knew that he was most warmly remembered.
Viirsing was at that time the director, Julius
Rietz the conductor, and the opera was to have
been brought out in the spring of 1849, but 'lk
came to nothing. In June, when the preparations
were to have begun, Schumann was detained by
domestic circumstances, and the rest of the year
Slipped away with constant evasions and pro
mises on the part of the director of the theatre.
Even the promise, 'on his honour/ that the
opera should be performed at the end of Feb
ruary 1850, at latest, was not kept. And so
on this his very first attempt at dramatic work,
Schumann made acquaintance with the shady
side of theatrical management in a way which
must have disgusted his upright and honourable
spirit.^ In his indignation, he would have made
the director's breach of faith public, by in
voking the aid of the law; but his Leipzig
friends were happily able to dissuade him from
this course. At last, on June 25, 1850, the first
representation of ' Genoveva ' actually took place
under Schumann's own direction. But the time
was unfavourable; ' Who,' he writes to Dr. Her-
SCHUMANN.
399
mann Hartel, ' goes to the theatre in May or
June, and not rather into the woods ?' How
ever, the number of his admirers in Leipzig
was great, and the first opera by so famous a
master excited great expectations ; the house
was full, and the reception by the public, though
not enthusiastic, was honourable to the composer.
Still, artists and connoisseurs were tolerably
unanimous in thinking that Schumann lacked
the special genius for writing opera. His almost
entire exclusion of recitative was very widely
disapproved of. No one but the venerable Spohr,
who had attended many of the rehearsals, gave a
really favourable verdict upon the work. In his
last opera, 'The Crusaders,' Spohr himself had
adopted similar methods of making the music
follow the plot closely without ever coming to a
standstill, and he was naturally delighted to
find the same in Schumann's work. After three
representations (June 25, 28, 30) 'Genoveva'
was laid aside for the time. Schumann, already
vexed by the tedious postponements of the first
performance, and disappointed by the cold recep
tion of the work, was greatly annoyed by the
discussions in the public prints, especially by
a critique from Dr. E. Kriiger, one of the col-
laborateurs in the ' Neue Zeitschrift.' A letter
from Schumann to Kriiger, in stronger terms
than might have been expected from him, put
an end for ever to their acquaintance.
Schumann derived far more gratification from
the reception of his music to 'Faust.' In 1848
he completed the portion he had originally in
tended to write first, viz. the salvation of Faust,
which forms the end of the second part of Goethe's
poem. On June 25, 1848, the first performance
took place among a limited circle of friends, upon
whom it made a deep impression. The most
cultivated portion of the audience was of opinion
that the music made the meaning of the words
clear for the first time, so deeply imbued was the
composer with the poet's inmost spirit. As the
looth anniversary of Goethe's birthday was
approaching (Aug. 28, 1849) it was decided to
give a festival concert in Dresden, at which
this 'Faust' music and Mendelssohn's ' Walpur-
gisnacht ' should form the programme. When
the Leipzig people heard of this intention, they
would not be behind Dresden, and also got up
a performance of the same works on August
29. In Weimar too the ' Faust ' music was per
formed on the same occasion. Schumann was
exceedingly delighted that his work had been
employed for so special an occasion. He writes to
Dr. Hartel ; ' I should like to have Faust's cloak,
and be able to be everywhere at once, that I
might hear it.' In Dresden the success of the
work was very considerable, but it made less
impression at its first performance in Leipzig.
Schumann took this quite calmly. 'I hear different
accounts/ says he in a letter, 'of the impression
produced by my scenes from Faust ; some seem
to have been affected, while upon others it made
no definite impression. This is what I expected.
Perhaps an opportunity may occur in the winter for
a repetition of the work, when it is possible that
400
SCHUMANN.
I may add some other scenes. This repetition
however did not take place in Schumann's life
time. He fulfilled his scheme of adding several
scenes; and in 1853 prefixed an overture to the
whole work, which was divided into three parts.
It was not published complete until two years
after his death.
In the meantime, Schumann's health had
again improved, as was evident from his aug
mented creative activity. Indeed his eager desire
for work increased in a way which gave rise to
great apprehensions. In the year 1849 alone he
produced thirty works, most of them of consider
able extent. It had never seemed so easy to him
to create ideas and bring them into shape. He
composed as he walked or stood, and could not
be distracted, even by the most disturbing circum
stances. Thus he wrote Mignon's song ' Kennst
du das Land' at Kreischa, near Dresden, in the
midst of a group of his noisy children. And in a
restaurant near the post-office, much frequented
by the artistic society of Dresden, where he used
to drink his beer in the evening, he would usually
sit alone, with his back to the company and his
face to the wall, whistling softly to himself, and
developing his musical ideas all the time. No
preference for any particular form of art can be
traced in Schumann's work at this time. Piano
forte works and chamber trios, songs and vocal
duets, choruses, choral works with orchestra,
concertos with orchestra, compositions for horn,
clarinet, oboe, violoncello, or violin, with piano
forte accompaniment, even melodramatic music
— all these thronged as it were out of his imagin
ation in wild and strange succession. Among
all the beautiful and important works produced
at this time, the music to Byron's Manfred de
serves especial mention. The first stage perform
ance of it was given by Franz Liszt in Weimar
on June 13, 1852. For that occasion the drama
was adapted for the stage by Schumann himself,
in an arrangement which is printed as a preface
to the score of the work. The first performance
of the music at a concert took place at Leipzig
on March 24, 1859.
Dresden was Schumann's place of residence
until 1850. In the latter years of his stay there his
outward life was more active than before. No
journeys of note were made, it is true, with the
exception of those to Vienna and Berlin already
mentioned, and a longer expedition undertaken
in 1850 to Bremen and Hamburg, where many
concerts were given. He avoided the passing
disturbance occasioned by the Dresden insurrec
tion of 1849, by leaving the town with his family.
Though no revolutionary, like Richard Wagner,
scarcely even a politician, Schumann loved in
dividual liberty and wished others to enjoy it
also. But what gave a different aspect to his
life as a musician in the last years of his stay
in Dresden, was his occupation as a conductor.
Ferdinand Hiller had conducted a choral society
for men's voices ; and when he left Dresden
to go to Dusseldorf as municipal director of
music, Schumann succeeded him in his post.
He conducted the society for some time with
SCHUMANN.
great interest, and was glad to find that his
capacity for conducting was not so small as he
had generally fancied it to be. He was even
induced to write a few works for male chorus.
Three songs of War and Liberty (Kriegs- und
Freiheitslieder, op. 62) and seven songs in canon-
form, to words by Riickert (op. 65), were written
in 1847, and a grand motet for double chorus of
men's voices (op. 93) in 1849. But a nature like
Schumann's could not thrive in the atmosphere of
a German singing club. He was in all respects
too refined for the tone of vulgar comfort, and
often even of low sentimentality, which pervades
these assemblies, and they could not but be irk
some to him. ' I felt myself,' he says, in a letter
to Hiller written on April 10, 1849, after his with
drawal, 'out of my- element; they were such nice
(hiibsch) people.' This is even noticeable in his
compositions for male chorus ; they are not of the
right kind, and have in consequence never been
much sung. Of greater artistic importance was
a society of mixed voices, which was constituted
in January 1848, and of which Schumann was
asked to take the lead. It was not very large
—in 1849 it numbered only 60 or 70 members —
but these were efficient, and Schumann was ahle
'to perform correctly any music he liked with
pleasure and delight.' It was this society that
gave the first performance of the third part of
'Faust's Salvation' in June 1848, at a private
party; Schumann was induced to write many
new compositions for them, and they did much
service in promoting a knowledge of his music in
Dresden by two performances of ' Paradise and
the Peri' on Jan. 5 and 12, 1850. They even suc
ceeded in drawing him into social amusements.
In August 1848 a general excursion was arranged,
in which Schumann took what was, for him, a
lively interest. He even invited David and his
wife to come over from Leipzig for the occasion,
writing, ' Listen ; on Sunday week we are going
with the choral society for a trip of pleasure and
music to Pillnitz. It will be great fun; there
will be some pretty women and plenty of singing.
How would it be, David, if you were to come too ?
Much indeed depends upon the weather, but the
party will only be put off in case of heavy rain.'
That Schumann, after so successful a beginning
in the art of conducting, considered himself
fitted to undertake the direction of performances
on a larger scale, is evident from the following
circumstance. After Mendelssohn's death the
Gewandhaus concerts were conducted by Julius
Rietz, who until 1847 had been at work in
Dusseldorf. In the summer of 1849 a report
reached Dresden that Eietz was going to suc
ceed O. Nicolai as royal Capellmeister at Berlin.
Schumann thereupon applied for the post of con
cert director at the Gewandhaus. Dr. Hermann
Hartel was to be the medium of communication,
and Schumann, with a well-founded expectation
that the choice would fall upon him, gave him
self up for a time with great pleasure to the
idea of becoming the successor of the honoured
Mendelssohn. ' It would give me great pleasure,
he wrote, ' if the thing came to pass. I long for
SCHUMANN.
regular duty, and though I can never forget the
last few years, during which I have lived exclu
sively as a composer, and know that so productive
and happy a time may perhaps never be mine
again, yet I feel impelled towards a life of active
work, and my highest endeavour would be to
keep up the renown which the institution has
so long enjoyed.' This wish was not realised,
for Rietz remained in Leipzig. But Schumann's
desire for a more extended field of work as a
conductor was to be satisfied in another way in
the following year.
In 1850 Hiller gave up his post in Diisseldorf
to obey a call to Cologne as Capellmeister to that
city. He suggested that Schumann should be
his successor, and opened negotiations with him.
Some efforts were made to keep him in Dresden
and to obtain his appointment as Capell
meister to the King of Saxony ; but the attempt
was unsuccessful, and Schumann accepted the
directorship at Diisseldorf that summer though
he left his native place with deep regret, and
not without some suspicions as to the condi
tion of music in Diisseldorf, of which he had
heard much that was unfavourable from Men
delssohn and Rietz. In his new post he had the
direction of a vocal union and of an orchestra*
and a number of concerts to conduct in the
course of the winter. He arrived at Diisseldorf
Sept. 2, 1850, and the first winter concert was
in some sort a formal reception of him, since it
consisted of the overture to ' Genoveva,' some of
his songs, and Part I. of ' Paradise and the Peri.1
It was under the direction of Julius Tausch ;
Schumann himself appearing as conductor for
the first time on Oct. 24.
He was very well satisfied with his new sphere
of work. The vocal resources, as is the case
with all the choirs of the Rhine towns, were
admirable ; Hiller had cultivated them with
special zeal, and he and Rietz had left the
orchestra so well drilled that Schumann, for the
first time in his life, enjoyed the inestimable
advantage of being able to hear everything that
he wrote for the orchestra performed at once.
The concerts took up no more of his time than
he was willing to give, and left him ample
leisure for his own work. Chamber music was
also attainable, for in J. von Wasielewski there
was a good solo violinist on the spot. Schu
mann and his wife were at once welcomed in
Diisseldorf with the greatest respect, and every
attention and consideration was shown to them
both. It might be said that their position here
was one of special ease, and they soon formed
a delightful circle of intimate acquaintances.
Little as his music was then known in the
Rhine-cities, Schumann's advent in person seems
to have given a strong impulse to the public
feeling for music in Diisseldorf. The interest in
the subscription concerts during the winter of
1850 was greater than it had ever been before;
and the board of directors was able at the
close of the usual series of six concerts, to un
dertake a second series of three or four. At
Schumann's instance one of the winter concerts
VOL. in. FT. 3.
SCHUMANN.
401
was entirely devoted to the works of living
composers, an idea then perfectly novel, and
showing that he had remained faithful to his
desire — manifested long before through the Zeit-
schrift — of facilitating the advancement of young
and gifted composers. At first Schumann's
direction gave entire satisfaction. If some per
formances were not perfectly successful, they
were compensated for by others of special excel
lence ; and the execution of Beethoven's A major
Symphony at the third concert even seemed to
shew that he was a born conductor. But it was
not so in reality ; indeed he was wholly want
ing in the real talent for conducting; all who
ever saw him conduct or who played under his
direction are agreed on this point. Irrespective
of the fact that conducting for any length of
time tired him out, he had neither the collect-
edness and prompt presence of mind, nor the
sympathetic faculty, nor the enterprising dash,
without each of which conducting in the true
sense is impossible. He even found a difficulty
in starting at a given tempo ; nay, he sometimes
shrank from giving any initial beat; so that
some energetic pioneer would begin without
waiting for the signal, and without incurring
Schumann's wrath. Besides this, any thorough
practice bit by bit with his orchestra, with
instructive remarks by the way as to the mode
of execution, was impossible to this great artist,
who in this respect was a striking contrast to
Mendelssohn. He would have a piece played
through, and if it did not answer to his wishes,
had it repeated. If it went no better the second,
or perhaps even a third time, he would be ex
tremely angry at what he considered the clumsi
ness or even the ill-will of the players ; but detailed
remarks he never made. Any one knowing his
silent nature and his instinctive dislike to con
tact with the outer world, might certainly have
feared from the first that he would find great
difficulty in asserting himself as a director of large
masses. And as years went on his incapacity
for conducting constantly increased, as the issue
showed, with the growth of an illness, whicn,
after seeming to have been completely overcome
in Dresden, returned in Diisseldorf with increasing
gravity. His genius seemed constantly to shrink
from the outside world into the depths of his
soul. His silence became a universally accepted
fact, and to those who saw him for the first time be
seemed apathetic. But in fact he was anything
rather than that ; he would let a visitor talk for
a long time on all kinds of subjects without
saying a word, and then when the caller rose to
leave, 'not to disturb the master longer,' he would
discover that Schumann had followed the one
sided 'conversation' with unfailing interest. When
sitting for an hour, as he was accustomed of an
evening, with friends or acquaintances at the re
staurant, if anything was said that touched or
pleased him he would give the speaker a radiant,
expressive glance, but without a word ; and the
incessant creative labours to which he gave him
self up so long as he was able are the best proof
of the rich vitality which constantly flowed
Dd
402
SCHUMANN.
from the deepest sources of his soul. In the
family circle he was a different man ; there he
could be gay and talkative to a degree that
would have surprised a stranger. He Joved his
children tenderly and was fond of occupying him
self with them. The three piano sonatas (op.
1 1 8) composed for his daughters Julie, Blise and
Marie, the Album for beginners (op. 68) ; the
Children's Ball (op. 130), and other pieces, are
touching evidence of the way in which he ex
pressed this feeling in music.
The first great work of the Dusseldorf period
was the Eb Symphony (op. 97), marked by the
composer as no. 3, although it is really the fourth
of the published ones, the D minor Symphony
preceding it in order of composition. If we call
the Overture, Scherzo and Finale (op. 52) a sym
phony too, then the Eb Symphony must rank
as the fifth. It would seem that Schumann had
begun to work at it before his change of resi
dence. As soon as he conceived the project of
leaving Saxony for the Rhine, he bethought
himself of the great musical festival which ever
since 1818 had been held in the lower Rhine1
districts, and was inspired by the idea of assist
ing at one of these in the capacity of a com
poser. He wrote down this great work with
its five movements between Nov. 2 and Dec.
9, 1850. He has told us that it was intended to
convey the impressions which he received during
a visit to Cologne ; so that its ordinary name of
the ' Rhenish Symphony ' may be accepted as
correct. It was first performed at Dusseldorf on
Feb. 6, 1851, and then at Cologne on Feb. 25,
both times under the direction of the composer,
but was coldly received on both occasions.2
Although Schumann had had no pleasant
experiences in connection with the opera ' Geno-
veva,' he was not to be deterred from making
another essay in dramatic composition. In Oct.
1850 he received from Richard Pohl, at that time
a student in the Leipzig university, Schiller's
'Bride of Messina' arranged as an opera libretto.
Schumann could not make up his mind to set it
to music ; but in Dec. 1850 and Jan. 1851 he
wrote an Overture to the 'Braut von Messina'
(op. 100), which showed how much the material
of the play had interested him, in spite of his
refusal to set it. He inclined to a more cheerful,
or even a comic subject, and Goethe's ' Hermann
und Dorothea ' seemed to him appropriate for an
operetta. He consulted several poets concerning
the arrangement, and having made out a scheme
of treatment, wrote the Overture at Christmas
1851 (op. 136). The work however progressed no
farther. He subsequently turned his attention to
Auerbach's 'Dorfgesehichten,' but without finding
any good material, and no second opera from his
pen ever saw the light.
He completed however a number of vocal
compositions for the concert-room, in which his
taste for dramatic musie had free play. A young
poet from Chemnitz, Moritz Horn, had sent him
1 See this Dictionary, vol. ii. p. 467.
2 Its first performance in England was at a Concert of Signer
Arditi's, Dec. 4. 1865.
SCHUMANN.
a faery poem, which greatly interested him.
After many abbreviations and alterations made
by Horn himself at Schumann's suggestion, ' The
Pilgrimage of the Rose ' (Der Rose Pilgerfahrt,
op. 112) was really set to music between April
and July 1851. The work, which both in form
and substance resembles ' Paradise and the
Peri,' except that it is treated in a manner at
once more detailed and more idyllic, had at first
a simple pianoforte accompaniment, but in No
vember Schumann arranged it for orchestra. June
185 1 is also the date of the composition of Uhland's
ballad 'Der Konigssohn' (op. 116) in a semi-dra
matic form, to which indeed he was almost driven
by the poem itself. Schumann was much pleased
with his treatment of this ballad, which he has
set for soli, chorus, and orchestra. In the course
of the next two years he wrote three more works
of the same kind : ' Des Sangers Fluch' (op. 139),
a ballad of Uhland's ; ' Vom Pagen und der
Konigstochter' (op. 140) a ballad by Geibel ; and
'Das Gluck von Edenhall' (op. 143), a ballad by
Uhland.
In the last two poems he made alterations of
more or less importance, to bring them into shape
for musical setting, but the ' Sangers Fluch ' had
to be entirely remodelled — a difficult and un
grateful task, which Richard Pohl carried out
after Schumann's own suggestions.
At that time this young man, a thorough art-
enthusiast, kept up a lively intercourse with
Schumann both personally and by letter. They
devised together the plan of a grand oratorio.
Schumann wavered between a biblical and an
historical subject, thinking at one time of the
Virgin Mary, at another of Ziska or Luther. His
final choice fell upon Luther. He pondered deeply
upon the treatment of his materials. It was to
be an oratorio suitable both for the church and
the concert room, and in its poetical form as
dramatic as possible. In point of musical treat
ment he intended the chorus to predominate, as
in Handel's 'Israel in Egypt,' of which he had
given a performance in the winter of 1 850. More
over it was not to be complicated and contra
puntal in style, but simple and popular, so that
' peasant and citizen alike should understand it.'
The more he pondered it the more was he in
spired with the grandeur of the subject, although
by no means blind to its difficulties. 'It inspires
courage ' he says, * and also humility.' He
could not however coincide with his poet's
opinion as to the extent of the work, the
latter having formed the idea of a sort of
trilogy, in oratorio form, while Schumann wished
the work to be within the limit of one evening's
performance, lasting about two hours and a half.
In this way the few years of creative activity
that were still granted to him slipped away, and
the oratorio remained unwritten. The impossi
bility of satisfying, by the oratorio on Luther,
the inclination for grave and religious music
which became ever stronger with increasing
years, is partly the reason of his writing in 1852
a Mass (op. 147) and a Requiem (op. 148). But
to these he was also incited by outward circum-
SCHUMANN.
stances . Th e i nhabitants of Diisseldorf are mostly
Catholics, the organ-lofts in the principal churches
are too small to hold a large choir and orchestra,
and the regular church-music was in a bad con
dition. The choral society which Schumann con
ducted was accustomed, as a reward for its labours,
to have several concerts of church music, or at
least sacred compositions, every year ; and Schu
mann was probably thinking ot' this custom in
his Mass and his Requiem, but he was not des
tined ever to hear them performed.
In the summer of 1851 he and his family made
a tour in Switzerland, which he had not visited
since the time of his student-life in Heidelberg ;
on his return he went to Antwerp, for a com
petitive performance by the Belgian 'Manner-
gesangverein ' (a society of male singers), on
August 1 7, at which he had been asked to aid in
adjudging the prizes. Two years later, towards
the end of 1853, ne an(^ n^s wife once more
visited the Netherlands, and made a concert-tour
through Holland, meeting with such an enthusi
astic reception that he could not help saying that
his music seemed to have struck deeper root
there than in Germany. In March 1852 they
revisited Leipzig, where, between the I4th and
the 2 ist, a quantity of his music was performed;
the Manfred overture and the ' Pilgerfahrt der
Rose' at a public matine'e on the I4th; the D
minor Sonata for pianoforte and violin (op. 121)
in a private circle, on the I5th; the Eb Sym
phony at a concert at the Gewandhaus on the
1 8th ; the Pianoforte Trio in G minor (op. 1 10) at
a chamber concert on the 2 ist. On Nov. 6, 1851,
the overture to the ' Braut von Messina ' was also
performed at the Gewandhaus. The public had
thus, during this season, ample opportunity of be
coming acquainted with the latest works of this in
exhaustible composer. But although he had lived
in Leipzig for fourteen years, and had brought
out most of his compositions there, besides having
a circle of sincerely devoted friends in that city,
he could not on this occasion boast of any great
success,1 the public received him with respect
and esteem, but with no enthusiasm. But in this
respect Schumann had lived through a variety
of experience ; ' I am accustomed,' he writes to
Pohl, Dec. 7, 1851, when speaking of the recep
tion of the overture to the ' Braut von Messina,'
'to find that my compositions, particularly the
best and deepest, are not understood by the public
at a first hearing.' Artists however had come to
Leipzig from some distance for the ' Schumann-
week ' ; among them Liszt and Joachim.
In August 1852 there was held in Diisseldorf
a festival of music for men's voices, in which
Schumann assisted as conductor, though, owing
to his health, only to a very limited extent.
He took a more important part at Whitsuntide
1853, when the 3ist of the Lower Rhine Festi
vals was celebrated in Diisseldorf on May 15,
16, and 17. He conducted the music of the first
day, consisting of Handel's ' Messiah ' and of
his own Symphony in D minor, which was ex
ceedingly well received. In the concerts of the
two following days, which were conducted chiefly
SCHUMANN.
403
by Hiller, two more of Schumann's larger compo
sitions were performed ; the Pianoforte Concerto
in A minor, and a newly composed Festival
Overture with soli and chorus on the ' Rhein-
weinlied' (op. 123). But although Schumann
appeared in so brilliant a way as a composer,
and as such was honoured and appreciated in
Diisseldorf, yet there was no concealing the
fact that as a conductor he was inefficient.
The little talent for conducting that he showed
on his arrival in Diisseldorf had disappeared
with his departing health. It was in fact
necessary to procure some one to take his place.
An attempt was made after the first winter
concert of the year (Oct. 27, 1853) to induce him
to retire fora time from the post of his own accord.
But this proposal was badly received. The fact
however remains, that from the date just men
tioned all the practices and performances were
conducted by Julius Tausch, who thus became
Schumann's real successor. No doubt the direc
tors of the society were really in the right ;
though perhaps the form in which Schumann's
relation to the society was expressed might
have been better chosen. The master was now
taken up with the idea of leaving Diisseldorf as
soon as possible, and of adopting Vienna, for
which he had preserved a great affection, as his
permanent residence. But fate had decided
otherwise.
The dissatisfaction induced in his mind by
the events of the autumn of 1853 was however
mitigated partly by the tour in Holland already
mentioned, and partly by another incident. It
happened that in October a young and wholly
unknown musician arrived, with a letter of in
troduction from Joachim. Johannes Brahms —
for he it was — immediately excited Schumann's
warmest interest by the genius of his playing and
the originality of his compositions. In his early
days he had always been the champion of the
young and aspiring, and now as a matured artist
he took pleasure in smoothing the path of this
gifted youth. Schumann's literary pen had lain
at rest for nine years ; he now once more took it
up, for the last time, in order to say a powerful
word for Brahms to the wide world of art. An
article entitled ' Neue Bahnen' (New Paths) ap
peared on Oct. 28, 1853, in No. 18 of that year's
' Zeitschrift.' In this he pointed to Brahms as
the artist whose vocation it would be 'to utter the
highest ideal expression of our time.' He does not
speak of him as a youth or beginner, but welcomes
him into the circle of Masters as a fully equipped
combatant. When before or since did an artist
find such words of praise for one of his fellows ? It
is as though, having already given so many noble
proofs of sympathetic appreciation, he could not
leave the world without once more, after his
long silence, indelibly stamping the image of his
pure, lofty, and unenvious artist-nature on the
hearts of his fellow men.
So far as Brahms was concerned, it is true that
this brilliant envoi laid him under a heavy debt
of duty, in the necessity of measuring his produc
tions by the very highest standard ; and at the
Dd2
404
SCHUMANN.
time Schumann was supposed to have attributed
to Brahms, as he did to the poetess Elisabeth
Kulmann, gifts which he did not actually possess.
Twenty-eight years have passed and we now know
that Schumann's keen insight did not deceive
him, and that Brahms has verified all the expecta
tions formed of him. His intercourse with the
young composer (then 20 years old), in whom he
took the widest and most affectionate interest,
was a great pleasure to Schumann.
At that time too Albert Dietrich (now Hof-
capellmeister at Oldenburg) was staying in Dxis-
seldorf, and Schumann proved to the utmost the
truth of what he had written only a few months
previously of Kirchner, that he loved to follow
the progress of young men. A sonata for piano
forte and violin exists in MS. which Schu
mann composed during this month (October
1853), in conjunction with Brahms and Dietrich.
Dietrich begins with an allegro in A minor ;
Schumann follows with an intermezzo in F major ;
Brahms — who signs himself Johannes Kreissler
junior — adds an allegro in C minor ; and Schu
mann winds up the work with a finale in A
minor, ending in A major. The title of the
sonata is worth noting. Joachim was coming
to Dusseldorf to play at the concert of Oct. 27,
so Schumann wrote on the title-page 'In an
ticipation of the arrival of our beloved and
honoured friend Joseph Joachim, this sonata
was written by Robert Schumann, Albert Die
trich, and Johannes Brahms.' l
This interesting intimacy cannot have con
tinued long, since in November Schumann went
to Holland with his wife, and did not return till
Dec. 22. But he met Brahms again in Hanover
in January 1854, a* a performance of 'Paradise
and the Peri,' where he found also Joachim and
Julius Otto Grimm (now musical director at
Miinster). A circle of gifted and devoted young
artists gathered round the master and rejoiced
in having him among them, little imagining that
within a few months he would be suddenly
snatched from them for ever.
Schumann's appearance was that of a man
with a good constitution ; his figure was above
the middle height, full and well-built ; but his
nervous system had always shown extreme ex
citability, and even so early as his twenty-fourth
year he suffered from a nervous disorder which
increased to serious disease. At a still earlier
date he had shown a certain morbid hypertension
of feeling, in connection with his passionate study
of Jean Paul, of whom he wrote, even in his i8th
year, that he often drove him to the verge of mad
ness. Violent shocks of emotion, as for instance the
sudden announcement of a death, or the struggle
for the hand of Clara Wieck, would bring him
into a condition of mortal anguish, and the most
terrible state of bewilderment and helplessness,
followed by days of overwhelming melancholy.
A predisposition to worry himself, an ' ingenuity
in clinging to unhappy idea*,' often embittered
the fairest moments of his life. Gloomy antici-
1 The MS. is in Joachim's possession.
SCHUMANN.
pations darkened his soul ; 'I often feel as if I
should not live much longer,' he says in a letter
to Zuccalmaglio of May 18, 1837, 'and I should
like to do a little more work ' ; and later, to Hiller
— 'man must work while it is yet day.' The
vigour of youth for a time conquered these
melancholy aberrations, and after his marriage
the calm and equable happiness which he found
in his wife for a long time expelled the evil
spirit. It was not till 1844 that he a^ain fell
a prey to serious nervous tension. This was
evidently the result of undue mental strain, and
for a time he was forced to give up all work,
and even the hearing of music, and to with
draw into perfect solitude at Dresden. His im
provement was slow and not without relapses ;
but in 1849 he felt quite re-established, as we
gather from his letters and from the work he
accomplished; and his condition seems to have
remained satisfactory till about the end of 1851.
Then the symptoms of disease reappeared; he
had, as usual, been again working without pause
or respite, and even with increased severity ; and
was himself so much alarmed as to seek a
remedy. Various eccentricities of conduct be
trayed even to strangers the state of nervous ex
citability in which he was. By degrees delusions
grew upon him, and he fancied that he incessantly
heard one particular note, or certain harmonies,
or voices whispering words of reproof or en
couragement. Once in the night he fancied that
the spirits of Schubert and Mendelssohn brought
him a musical theme, and he got up and noted it
down. He was again attacked by that 'mortal
anguish of mind ' of which he had had former ex
perience, and which left him perfectly distracted.
Still, all these symptoms were but temporary,
and between the attacks Schumann was in full
possession of his senses and self control. He himself
expressed a wish to be placed in an asylum, but
meanwhile worked on in his old way. He wrote
some variations for the piano on the theme re
vealed to him by Schubert and Mendelssohn,
but they were his last work, and remained un
finished. On Feb. 27, 1854, in the afternoon,
in one of his fits of agony of mind, he left the
house unobserved and threw himself from the
bridge into the Rhine. Some boatmen were on
the watch and rescued him, and he was recognised
and carried home. Unmistakeable symptoms of
insanity now declared themselves, but after a few
days a peculiar clearness and calmness of mind
returned, and with it his irrepressible love of
work. He completed the variation on which he
had been at work before the great catastrophe.
These last efforts of his wearied genius remain
unpublished, but Brahms has used the theme for
a set of 4-hand variations which form one of his
most beautiful and touching works (op. 23), and
which he has dedicated to Schumann's daughter
Julie.
The last two years of Schumann's life were
spent in the private asylum of Dr. Richarz at
Endenich near Bonn. His mental disorder de
veloped into deep melancholy ; at times — as JQ
the spring of 1855 — when for a while he seemed,
SCHUMANN.
better, his outward demeanour was almost the
same as before. He corresponded with his friends
and received visits, but gradually the pinions of
his soul drooped and fell, and he died in the arms
of his wife, July 29, 1856, only 46 years of age.
Soon after Schumann's death his music achieved
a popularity in Germany which will bear com
parison with that of the most favourite of the
older masters. When once the peculiarities of
his style grew familiar, it was realised that
these very peculiarities had their origin in the
deepest feelings of the nation. The desire of
giving outward expression to the love which was
felt towards him, soon asserted itself more and
more strongly. Schumann was buried at Bonn,
in the churchyard opposite the Sternenthor, and
it was resolved to erect a monument to him
there. On Aug. 17, 1 8 and 19, 1873, a Schumann
festival took place at Bonn, consisting entirely
of the master's compositions. The conducting
was undertaken by Joachim and Wasielewski,
and among the performers were Madame Schu
mann, who played her husband's Pianoforte Con
certo, and Stockhausen. The festival was one
of overwhelming interest, owing to the sympathy
taken in it, and the manner in which that sym
pathy was displayed. The proceeds of the con
certs were devoted to a monument to Schumann's
memory, which was executed by A. Donndorf of
Stuttgart, erected over the grave, and unveiled
on May 2, 1880. On this occasion also a concert
took place, consisting of compositions by Schu
mann, and Br.ihms's Violin Concerto (op. 77),
conducted by himself, and played by Joachim.
SCHUMANN.
405
Schumann, with his activity both as an author
and as a composer, was a new phenomenon in
German music. It is true that he had had a
predecessor in this respect in C. M. von Weber,
who also had a distinct gift and vocation for
authorship, and whose collected writings form a
literary monument possessing far more than a
merely personal interest. Still Weber was pre
vented by circumstances and by his own natural
restlessness from fully developing his literary
talent, while Schumann benefitted by the restraint
and discipline of his ten years of editorship. In
1854 he had his 'Gesammelte Schriften u'ber
Musik und Musiker ' published in four volumes
by Wigand in Leipzig, and it was not long in
reaching its second edition, which appeared in
two volumes in 1871. This collection however
is not nearly complete, and the essays it includes
have been much altered. A full and correct
edition of his writings is still a desideratum.
It must not however be imagined that Schu
mann's aim as an author was to lay down the
principles on which he worked as a composer;
it is indeed hardly possible to contrast the criti
cal and the productive elements in his works.
His authorship and his musical compositions were
two distinct phases of a creative nature, and if it
was by composition that he satisfied his purely
musical craving it was by writing that he gave
utterance to his poetical instincts. His essays are
for the most part rather rhapsodies on musical
works, or poetical imagery lavished on musical sub
jects, than criticisms properly speaking; and the
cases where he writes in the negative vein are
very rare exceptions. A high ideal floats before
his mind, and supported by the example of the
greatest masters of the art, his one aim is to
introduce a new and pregnant period of music in
contrast to the shallowness of his own time.
Again and again he speaks of this as the ' poetic
phase ' — and here we must guard against a mis
understanding. The term poetic music is often
used in antithesis to pure music, to indicate a
work based on a combination of poetry and
music ; as, for instance, a Song, which may be
conceived of either as a purely musical compo
sition founded on the union of definite feelings
and ideas, or as intended to express the precon
ceived emotions and ideas of the poet. But it
was not anything of this kind that Schumann
meant to convey : he simply regarded poetry as
the antithesis to prose, just as enthusiasm is the
antithesis to sober dulness, the youthful rhap-
sodist to the Philistine, the artist with his lofty
ideal to the mechanical artisan or the sxiperficial
dilettante. His aim is to bring to birth a living
art, full of purpose and feeling, and he cannot
endure a mere skeleton of forms and phrases. In
this key he pitches his writings on music, and
their purport is always the same. He once
speaks of reviewers and critics under a quaint
simile — ' Music excites the nightingale to love-
songs, the lap-dog to bark.' Nothing could more
accurately represent his own attitude in writing
on music than the first of these images. From
his point of view a piece of music ought to rouse
in the true critic sympathetic feeling, he ought
to absorb and assimilate its contents, and then
echo them in words — Schumann was in fact the
singing nightingale. Though we may not feel
inclined to apply his other comparison to every
critic who does not follow in his steps, we may
at least say that the difference between Schu
mann's style and that of the musical periodicals
of his day was as great as that between a night
ingale and a lap-dog. And how strange and new
were the tones uttered by this poet-critic! A
considerable resemblance to Jean Paul mu«t be
admitted, particularly in his earlier critiques :
the ecstatic youthful sentiment, the humorous
suggestions, the highly wrought and dazzling
phraseology, are common to both ; but the style
is quite different. Schumann commonly writes in
short and vivid sentences, going straight at his
subject without digressions, and indulging in
bold abbreviations. There is a certain indolence
of genius about him, and yet a sure artistic in
stinct throughout. Nor has he a trace of Jean
Paul's sentimental ' luxury of woe,' but we every
where find, side by side with emotional rhapsody,
the refreshing breeziness of youth and health.
It has already been said that Schumann con
nects certain definite characteristics with dif
ferent feigned names (Florestan, Eusebius, Earo,
etc.), a device which none but a poet could have
hit on. Indeed, it would be a hindrance to the
406
SCHUMANN.
writing of calm criticism, which must have a fixed
and clearly defined position as its basis. But it
often introduces a varied and even dramatic live
liness into the discussion, which is very attractive,
and leads to a deeper consideration of the subject.
Schumann, however, could use still more arti
ficial forms in his critiques. Thus he discusses
the first concert conducted by Mendelssohn at
the Gewandhaus, Oct. 1835, in letters addressed
by Eusebius to Chiara in Italy ; and within this
frame the details of the concert are gracefully
entwined with ingenious reflections and fanciful
O
ideas which add brilliancy to the picture. On
another occasion, when he was to write about a
mass of dance- music, Schumann has recourse to
the following fiction : — the editor of a certain
musical paper gives a historical fancy ball.
Composers are invited, young lady amateurs and
their mothers, music publishers, diplomatists, a
few rich Jewesses, and — of course— the Davids
biindler; the dance-programme includes the
music to be criticised, to which the couples whirl
about during the whole evening. Hence arise
all sorts of humorous incidents — satirical, whim
sical, and sentimental outpourings, in which a
criticism of the compositions is brought in unper-
ceived. On another occasion, the Davidsbiindler
have met, and the new compositions are played
in turns ; during the playing the rest carry on
a variety of amusements which culminate in a
magic lantern, throwing the figures of a masked
ball on the wall, which Florestan, standing on
the table, explains, while 'Zilia' plays Franz
Schubert's 'Deutsche Tanze.' Anything more
vivid, charming and poetical than this essay has
never been written on music (it is in the 'Gesam.
Schriften,' vol. ii. p. 9 ; and is partly translated in
'Music and Musicians,' i. p. 102); a little work
of art in itself ! Once, in reviewing a concert
given by Clara Wieck, he gives us a real poem
('Traumbild, am 9 September, 1838, Abends,'
vol. ii. p. 233). In this he combines his own
tender sentiments with a skilful characterisation
of all that was peculiar in the performance. For
sketching character-portraits Schumann shows
a conspicuous talent ; the articles in which he
has characterised Sterndale Bennett, Gade, and
Henselt are unsurpassed by any thing since written
concerning these artists. He seems to have pene
trated with the insight of a seer to the core of
their natures, and has set forth his conclusions
in a delicate and picturesque manner that no one
has succeeded in imitating. In his article 'Der
alteHauptmann' (cited as 'The Old Captain' in
1 Music and Musicians,' i. 98) he tells the story
of an old military man with a passion for music,
who has become intimate with the Davidsbiindler,
and describes his identity with a subtle obser
vation and keen insight that result in a really
classical treatment of the type of a kindly and
amiable dilettante, with a slight vein of melan
choly adding to the charm of the picture.
The foundation of Schumann's critiques lay in
kindness; his distingu6 character would simply
have nothing to do with anything bad enough to
demand energetic reproof. The most cutting
SCHUMANN.
and bitter article he ever wrote was the famous
one on Meyerbeer's 'Huguenots' (vol. ii. p. 220;
translated in 'Music and Musicians,' i. p. 302).
In its violence it has no doubt somewhat over
shot the mark ; but nowhere perhaps do the
purity and nobleness of Schumann's artistic views
shine forth more clearly than in this critique
and in the one immediately following on Men
delssohn's 'St. Paul.' It was the great success
of the ' Huguenots ' which infused the acid
into Schumann's antagonism ; for when dealing
with inoffensive writers he could wield the
weapons of irony and ridicule both lightly and
effectively. But he is most at his ease when
giving praise and encouragement ; then words
flow so directly from his heart that his turns
of expression have often quite a magical charm.
As an example we may mention the article on
Field's 7th Concerto (ibid. i. 268 ; ' Music and
Musicians,' i. p. 267). Anything more tender
and full of feeling was never written under the
semblance of a critique than the remarks on a
sonata in C minor by Delphine Hill-Handley
— formerly Delphine Schauroth (ibid. i. 92).
Schumann has here given us a really poetical
masterpiece in its kind, full of intelligent appre
ciation of the purport of the work and giving
covert expression to its maidenly feeling, even
in the style of his discussion ; it must delight
the reader even if he does not know a note of
the composition. Schumann had fresh imagery
always at command, and if in a generally meri
torious work he found something to blame, he
contrived to do it in the most delicate manner.
His amiable temper, his tender heart and his
conspicuous talents- for literary work combined,
never left him at a loss in such cases for some
ingenious or whimsical turn. Sometimes, though
rarely, in his eager sympathy for youthful genius
in difficulty he went too far ; Hermann Hirsch-
bach, for instance, never fulfilled the hopes that
Schumann formed of him ; and even in his re
marks on Berlioz, he at first probably said more
than he would afterwards have maintained.
In later years Schumann's flowery and poetic
vein gave way to a calm and contemplative
style. His opinions and principles remained as
sound as ever, but they are less keenly and bril
liantly expressed than at the earlier period when
he took peculiar pleasure in turning a flashing
and ingenious sentence (see Ges. Schriften, vol. i.
pp. 27, 208). Still, the practical musician always
predominates, and Schumann himself confesses
that ' the curse of a mere musician often hits
higher than all your aesthetics' (ibid. ii. 246).
Here and there however we come upon a pro
found aesthetic axiom, the value of which is in
no degree diminished by our perception that it is
the result rather of intuition than of any system
atic reflection. It is universally acknowledged
that by his essay ' On certain corrupt passages in
classical works' (ibid. iv. 59; 'Music and Musi
cians,' i. 26), Schumann gave a real impetus to
the textual criticism of music ; historical clues
and comparisons are frequently suggested, and
though these indications are not founded on any
SCHUMANN.
comprehensive historical knowledge, on all im
portant subjects they show a happy instinct for
the right conclusion, and are always worthy of
attention.
It may be said of Schumann's literary work
in general that it was not calculated to attract
attention merely for the moment, though it did
in fact open up new paths, but that it took the
form of writings which have a high and perma
nent value. They will always hold a foremost
place in the literature of music, and may indeed
take high rank in the literature of art. For
analytical acumen they are less remarkable.
Schumann cannot be called the Lessing of music,
nor is it by, the display of learning that he pro
duces his effects. It is the union of poetic
talent with musical genius, wide intelligence, and
high culture, that stamps Schumann's writings
with originality, and gives them their indepen
dent value.
Schumann's literary work was connected with
another phase of the musical world of Germany,
as new in its way as the twofold development of
his genius — the rise of party feeling. No doubt
Schumann gave the first impetus to this move
ment, both by his imaginary ' Davidsbiindler-
schaft,' and by that Radical instinct which was
part of his nature. Schumann's principles as
an artist were the same which have been pro
fessed and followed by all the greatest German
masters ; what was new in him was the active
attempt to propagate them as principles. So
long as he conducted the Zeitschrift he could
not of course lend himself to party feeling ; the
standard he had assumed was so high that all
who took a serious view of art were forced to
gather round him. But the spirit of agitation
was inflamed, and when he retired from the paper
other principles of less general application were
put forward. It was self-evident that Schumann
was the only contemporary German composer
who could stand side by side with Mendelssohn,
and they were of course compared. It was as
serted that in Mendelssohn form took the prece
dence of meaning, while in Schumann meaning
predominated, striving after a new form of utter
ance. Thus they were put forward as the repre
sentatives of two antagonistic principles of art,
and a Mendelssohn party and a Schumann party
were formed. In point of fact there was scarcely
any trace of such an antagonism of principle
between the two composers ; the difference was
really one of idiosyncrasy ; and so, being grounded
more or less on personal feeling the parties
assumed something of the character of cliques.
The literary Schumannites, having the command
of an organ of their own, bad an advantage over
the partisans of Mendelssohn, who like Men
delssohn himself, would have nothing to do with
the press. Leipzig was for a time the head
quarters of the two parties. There, where Men
delssohn had worked for the delight and
improvement of the musical world, it was the
fate of his art to be first exposed to attack and
detraction, which, to the discredit of the German
nation, rapidly spread through wider and wider
SCHUMANN.
407
circles, and was fated too to proceed first from
the blind admirers of the very master for whom
Mendelssohn ever felt the deepest attachment
and respect. ' Oh, Clique ! ' exclaims Moscheles
in his Diary for 1849, 'as if in a town where the
genius of a Schumann is honoured it were neces
sary to cry down a Mendelssohn as pedantic and
inferior to him. The public is losing all its judg
ment, and placing its intelligence and its feelings
under an influence which misleads it as much as
the revolutionists do the populace.' That Schu
mann himself must have been painfully affected
by this spirit is as clear as that it could only
result in hindering the unprejudiced reception
of his works ; and the process thus begun with
Schumann has been carried on, in a greater
degree, in the case of Wagner.
As a composer Schumann started with the
pianoforte, and until the year 1840 wrote
scarcely anything but pianoforte music. For some
time he used to compose sitting at the instru
ment, and continued to do so even until 1839,
though he afterwards condemned the practice
(in his ' Musikalische Haus- und Lebensregeln ').
At all events it had the advantage of
making him write from the first in true
pianoforte style. If ever pianoforte works
took their origin from the innermost nature
of the pianoforte, Schumann's did so most
thoroughly. His mode of treating the in
strument is entirely new. He develops upon
it a kind of orchestral polyphony, and by means
of the pedal, of extended intervals, of peculiar
positions of chords, of contractions of the hands,
and so forth, he succeeds in bringing out of it an
undreamt-of wealth of effects of tone. How
deeply and thoroughly Schumann had studied
the character of the instrument may be seen
from the detailed preface to his arrangement of
Paganini's caprices (op. 3). Even in his earliest
PF. works he nowhere shows any inclination to
the method of any of the older masters, except
in the variations, op. I, which betray the in
fluence of the schooLof Hummel and Moscheles.
But it is evident that he knew all that others
had done, and the time and attention devoted
in his writings to works of technical pianoforte
study were no doubt deliberately given. Not
withstanding this his compositions are scarcely
ever written in the bravura style ; for he seldom
cared to clothe his ideas in mere outward bril
liancy. Sometimes one is constrained to wonder
at his abstemiousness in using the higher and
lower registers of the pianoforte.
As is the case with the technical treatment of
the piano, so it is from the beginning with the
substance and form of his compositions. Few
among the great German masters show such
striking originality from their very first com
positions. In the whole range of Schumann's
works there is scarcely a trace of any other
musician. At the outset of his course as a
composer he preferred to use the concise dance
or song-form, making up his longer pieces from
a number of these smaller forms set together
as in a mosaic, instead of at once casting his
408
SCHUMANN.
thoughts in a larger mould. But the versa
tility with which the small forms are treated is
a testimony to the magnitude of his creative
faculty. The predominance of the small forms
is explained by his earlier method of composing.
Diligent and constant though he was in later
years, in early life his way of working was fitful
and inconstant. The compositions of this period
seem as if forced out of him by sudden impulses
of genius. As he subsequently says of his early
works, ' the man and the musician in me were
always trying to speak at the same time.' This
must indeed be true of every artist ; if the whole
personality be not put into a work of art, it
will be utterly worthless. But by those words
Schumann means to say that as a youth he at
tempted to bring to light in musical form his
inmost feelings with regard to his personal life-
experiences. Under such circumstances it is but
natural that they should contain much that was
purely accidental, and inexplicable by the laws of
art alone ; but it is to this kind of source that
they owe the magic freshness and originality with
which they strike the hearer. The variations,
op. i, are an instance of this. The theme is
formed of the following succession of notes : —
-/i b J
M
I
/?uy •
the names of which form the word 'Abegg.'
Meta Abegg was the name of a beautiful young
lady in Mannheim, whose acquaintance Schu
mann when a student had made at a ball.
Playful symbolism of this kind is not un-
frequent in him. To a certain extent it may
be traced back to Sebastian Bach, who expressed
his own name in a musical phrase ; as Schu
mann afterwards did Gade's. (See ' Album fur
die Jugend, op. 68, no. 41). In the same way
(Ges. Schriften, ii. 115) he expresses the
woman's name 'Beda' in musical notes, and also
in the ' Carnaval ' tried to make those letters
in his own name which stand as notes — s (es),
c, h, a — into a musical phrase. But the idea
really came from Jean Paul, who is very fond
of tracing out such mystic connections. Schu
mann's op. 2 consists of a set of small pianoforte
pieces in dance-form under the name of ' Papil
lons.' They were written partly at Heidelberg,
partly in the first years of the Leipzig period
which followed. No inner musical connection
subsists between them. But Schumann felt
the necessity of giving them a poetical con
nection, to satisfy his own feelings, if for
nothing else, and for this purpose he adopted
the * last chapter but one of Jean Paul's ' Flegel-
jahre,' where a masked ball is described at
which the lovers Wina and Walt are guests, as
a poetic background for the series. The several
pieces of music may thus be intended to represent
partly the different characters in the crowd of
maskers, and partly the conversation of the
i In a letter to his friend Henriette Voigt, Schumann calls it the
last chapter. This, although obviously a slip of the pen, has led
several writers to wonder what grand or fanciful idea lurks behind
the ' Paplllons.'
SCHUMANN.
lovers. The finale is written designedly with
reference to this scene in Jean Paul, as is plain
from the indication written above the notes found
near the end — ' The noise of the Carnival-night
dies away. The church clock strikes six.' The
strokes of the bell are actually audible, being
represented by the A six times repeated. Then
all is hushed, and the piece seems to vanish
into thin air like a vision. In the finale there
are several touches of humour. It begins with
an old Volkslied, familiar to every household in
Germany as the Grossvatertanz.2
t=t
1 1 •
— r— ;
•
1
This is immediately followed by a fragment of a
second Volkslied, in another tempc
also old, and sung in Saxony in the early part of
the 1 8th century. Sebastian Bach employed
the whole of it, also in a humorous way, in his
' Bauercantate.'
Schumann, notwithstanding his intimate ac
quaintance with much of Bach's music, can
scarcely have known of this, and so the fact of
their both lighting on the theme is only an in
teresting coincidence.3 In contrast to these two
old-fashioned love-tunes is placed the soft and
graceful melody of No. i of the 'Papillons,'
which is afterwards worked contrapuntally with
the ' Grossvatertanz.' The name ' Papillons ' is
not meant to indicate a light, fluttering character
in the pieces, but rather refers to musical phases
which, proceeding from various experiences of
life, have attained the highest musical import,
as the butterfly soars upwards out of the
chrysalis. The design of the title-page in the
first edition points towards some such meaning
as this ; and the explanation we have given
corresponds with his usual method of composing
at that time. There exists however no decisive
account of it by the composer himself.
In a kind of connection with the ' Papillons '
is the ' Carnaval,' op. 9. Here again Schumann
has depicted the merriment of a masquerade in
musical pictures and a third and somewhat simi
lar essay of the same kind is his ' Faschings-
schwank* aus Wien,' op. 26. The 'Carnaval' is
a collection of small pieces, written one by one
2 See GBOSSVATEKTANZ, voUi. p, 634 a.
8 Dehn's edition of the Bauercantate was published in 1839, 8 years
after Schumann had composed the • Papillons.'
4 FascJiing is a Gerrnan word for the Carnival.
SCHUMANN.
without any special purpose, and not provided
either with collective or individual titles until
later, when he arranged them in their present
order. The musical connection between the pieces
is, that with few exceptions they all contain some
reference to the succession of notes a, es, c, h
(A, Eb, C, B) or as, c, h (Ab, C, B). Now Asch
is the name of a small town in Bohemia, the
home of a Fraulein Ernestine von Fricken, with
whom Schumann was very intimate at the
time of his writing this music. The same notes
in another order, s (or es), c, h, a, are also
the only letters in Schumann's own name
which represent notes. This explains the title
' Sphinxes,' which is affixed to the 9th number
on p. 13 of the original edition. The pieces are
named, some from characters in the masked ball —
Pierrot (Clown,) Arlequin, Pan talon, and Colom-
bine, — and some from real persons. In this last
category we meet with the members of the
Davidsbund — Florestan, Eusebius, and Chia-
rina ; Ernestine von Fricken, under the name
Estrella, Chopin, and Paganini ; there is also a
' Coquette,' but it is not known for whom this is
intended. Besides these, some of the pieces are
named from situations and occurrences at the
ball ; a recognition, an avowal of love, a pro
menade, a pause in the dance (Reconnaissance,
Areu, Promenade, Pause) ; between these are
heard the sounds of waltzes, and in one of the
pieces the letters A • S • C • H, and S • C • H • A,
'Lettres dansantes,' themselves dance boister
ously and noisily, and then vanish like airy
phantoms. A piece called 'Papillons' rushes
by like a hasty reminiscence, and in the num
bers entitled 'Florestan' — an actual passage
from No. I of the Papillons (op. 2) is inserted.
The finale is called ' March of the Davidsbiindler
against the Philistines.' The symbol of the
Philistines is the ' Grossvatertanz,' here called
by Schumann a tune of the 1 7th century. The
fact of the march being in 3-4 time, a rhythm
to which it is of course impossible to march, has
perhaps a humorous and symbolic meaning.
The 'Davidsbundlertanze' (op. 6), the 'Fan
tasiestucke' (op. 12), ' Kindersceneu ' (op. 15),
'Kreisleriana' (op. 16), 'Novelletten' (op, 21),
'Bunte Blatter' (op. 99), and 'Albumblatter'
(op. 124), the contents of which all belong to
Schumann's early period, and, of the later works,
such pieces as the 'Waldscenen' (op. 82) — all
bear the impress of having originated like the
'Papillons' and the 'Carnaval/ in the personal
experiences of Schumann's life. They are po&sies
d'occasion (Gelegenheitsdichtungen), a term
which, in Goethe's sense, designates the highest
form that a work of art can take. As to the
'Davidsbundlertanze' the 'Kreisleriana,' and
the 'Novelletten,' Schumann himself tells us
that they reflect the varying moods wrought
in him by the contentions about Clara Wieck.
In the ' Davidsbundlertanze ' the general ar
rangement is that Florestan and Eusebius appear
usually by turns, though sometimes also together.
The expression ' dance ' does not however mean,
as is sometimes supposed, the dances that the
SCHUMANN.
409
Davidsbiindler led the Philistines, but merely
indicates the form of the pieces, which is, truth
to say, used with scarcely less freedom than that
of the march in the finale to the ' Carnaval.'
The ' Kreisleriana ' have their origin in a fan
tastic poem with the same title by E. T. A.
Hoffmann, contained in his ' Fantasiestucke im
Callots Manier' (Bamberg, 1814, p. 47). Hoff
mann was a follower of Jean Paul, who indeed
wrote a preface to ' Fantasiestiicke.' Half mu
sician, half poet, Schumann must have looked
on him as a kindred spirit ; and in the figure of
the wild and eccentric yet gifted ' Kapellmeister
Kreisler,' drawn by Hoffmann from incidents
in his own life, there were many traits in which
Schumann might easily see a reflection of him
self. Of the 'Novelletten' Schumann says that
they are 'long and connected romantic stories.'
There are no titles to explain them, although
much may be conjectured from the indications
of time and expression. But the rest of the
works we have just mentioned nearly always
have their separate component parts, headed
by names which lead the imagination of the
player or hearer, in a clear and often deeply
poetic manner, in a particular and definite direc
tion. This form of piano piece was altogether
a very favourite one with Schumann. He is
careful to guard against the supposition that he
imagined a definite object in his mind, such as
a 'pleading child ' (in op. 15) or a 'haunted spot
in a wood ' (in op. 82), and then tried to describe
it in notes. His method was rather to invent
the piece quite independently and afterwards to
give it a particular meaning by a superscription.
His chief object was always to give the piece a
value of its own, and to make it intelligible of
itself. This principle is undoubtedly the right
one, and, by adopting it, Schumann proved him
self a genuine musician, with faith in the inde
pendent value of his art. Nevertheless, had he
considered the poetical titles utterly unimportant,
he would hardly have employed them as he has
in so large a majority of his smaller pianoforte
pieces. His doing so seems to evince a feeling
that in the composition of the piece alone, he
had not said everything that struggled within
him for expression. Until a particular mood or
feeling had been aroused in the hearer or the
player by means of the title, Schumann could
not be sure that the piece would have the effect
which he desired it to have. Strictly speaking,
poetry and music can only be really united
by means of the human voice. But in these
pianoforte pieces with poetical titles Schumann
found a means of expression which hovered as
it were between pure instrumental music on the
one hand, and vocal music on the other, and
thus received a certain indefinite and mysterious
character of its own, which may most justly be
called Romantic.
Among the compositions consisting of small
forms we must count the Variations. Schu
mann treated the variation-form freely and
fancifully, but with a profuse wealth of genius
and depth of feeling. For the Impromptus on a
410
SCHUMANN.
theme by Clara Wieck (op. 5), Beethoven's so-
called 'Eroica Variations' (op. 35) apparently
served as a model ; they remind us of them
both in general arrangement and in the em
ployment of a ground-bass, without being in
any way wanting in originality. In the An
dante and Variations for two pianofortes (op.
46), one of the most charming and popular of
Schumann's pianoforte works, he treated the
form with such freedom that they are not so
much variations as fantasias in the style of
variations. His most splendid work in this form
is his op. 13, a work of the grandest calibre?
which alone would be sufficient to secure him
a place in the first rank of composers for the
pianoforte, so overpowering is the display of
his own individual treatment of the pianoforte
— frequently rising to the highest limits of
the bravura style of execution — of his over
flowing profusion of ideas, and his boldness in
turning the variation form to his own account.
In the finale the first two bars only of the
theme are employed,, and these only occasionally
in the ' working-out section.' In other respects
the proud edifice of this elaborately worked
number has nothing in common with a vari
ation. It contains however a delicate reference
to the person to whom the whole work is dedi
cated, William Sterndale Bennett. The begin
ning of the chief subject is a fragment of the
celebrated romance in Marschner's ' Templer
und Jiidin,' in which Ivanhoe calls on proud
England to rejoice over her noble knights (' Du
stolzes England, freue dich,' etc.). It is an in
genious way of paying homage to his beloved
English composer.
Schumann had made early attempts at works
of larger structure, but it cannot be denied that
they were not at first successful. The F# minor
Sonata (op. n) teems with beautiful ideas, but
is wanting in unity to a remarkable degree, at
least in the Allegro movements. The F minor
Sonata (op. 14) shows a decided improvement in
this respect, and the Sonata in G minor (op. 22)
is still better, although not entirely free from a
certain clumsiness. Schumann afterwards showed
himself quite aware of the faults of these sonatas
in regard to form. They offer the most striking
example of his irregular and rhapsodical method
of working at that period. The second move
ment of the G minor Sonata was written in
June 1830, the first and third in June 1833, the
fourth in its original form in October 1835, and
in its ultimate form in 1838, the whole sonata
being published in 1839. TheFfl minor Sonata
was begun in 1833, and not completed till 1835.
The F minor Sonata, finished on June 5, 1836,
consisted at first of five movements, an Allegro,
two Scherzos, one after the other, an Andantino
with variations, and a Prestissimo. When the
work was first published, under the title of
'Concerto sans Orchestra,' Schumann cut out the
two scherzos, apparently intending to use them
for a second sonata in F minor. This however
was not carried out, and in the second edition of
the work he restored the second of the scherzos
SCHUMANN.
to its place.1 When we observe how he took up
one sonata after another, we see how impossible
it is that any close connection can subsist
between the several parts, or that there should
be any real unity in them as a whole.
The Allegro for pianoforte (op. 8) is some
what disjointed in form, while the Toccata
(op, 7), a bravura piece of the greatest bril
liancy and difficulty in perfect sonata - form,
exhibits a great degree of connection and con
sequence. In the great Fantasia (op. 17) we
are led by the title to expect no conciseness
of form. The classical masters generally gave
to their fantasias a very clearly defined outline,
but Schumann in this case breaks through every
restriction that limits the form, especially in the
first movement, where he almost seems to lose
himself in limitless freedom. In order to give
unity to the fantastic and somewhat loosely con
nected movements of this work of genius, he
again had recourse to poetry, and prefaced the
piece with some lines of F. Schlegel's, as a
motto ; —
Durch alle TOne tenet Through all the tones that vibrate
Im bunten Erdentraum, About earth's mingled dream,
Ein leiser Ton gezogen One whispered note is sounding
Fur den der heimlich lauschet. For ears attent to hear.
The ' mingled earthly dream ' is in a manner
portrayed in the substance of the composition.
Schumann means that ' the ear attent to hear '
will perceive the uniting tones that run through
all the pictures which the imagination of the
composer unrolls to his view. Schlegel's motto
seems almost like an excuse offered by Schu
mann. The original purpose of this Fantasia
was not however to illustrate these lines. About
Dec. 17, 1835, an appeal having been made
from Bonn for contributions to a Beethoven
memorial, Schumann proposed to contribute a
composition ; and this was the origin of the
work now called 'Fantasia,' the three move
ments of which were originally intended to bear
the respective inscriptions of ' Ruins,' 'Triumphal
Arch ' and ' The Starry Crown.' By these names
the character both of the separate parts and
of the whole becomes more intelligible. In
order to get into the right disposition for the
work Schumann's four articles on Beethoven's
monument should be read (Gesammelte Scbrif-
ten, i. p. 215).
Although few of Schumann's pianoforte works
of the first period are without defects of form,
yet their beauties are so many that we easily
forget those defects. In certain ways the com
positions of the first ten years present the most
characteristic picture of Schumann's genius. In
after life he proposed and attained loftier ideals
in works worthy of the perfect master. But
the freshness and charm of his earlier piano
forte works was never surpassed, and in his
later years was but rarely reached. A dreamy
imaginative nature was united in Schumann's
character with a native solidity that never
i The first appeared in 1866 as No. 12 of the Posthumous Works,
published by Bieter-Biedermann, together with the discarded Finale
of the Sonata in G minor as Nu. 13.
SCHUMANN.
descended to the commonplace. From the first
his music had in it a character which appealed
to the people — nay, which was in a way na
tional ; and quickly as he reached his present
immense popularity in Germany, it will probably
be long before he has the same influence in other
nations, especially in France and Italy. After
Beethoven, Schumann is the only master who
possesses the power of giving full and free ex
pression to the humorous element in instrumental
music. Both in his writings and compositions he
allows it to have full play, and it is in his earlier
PF. works that it is most prominent. One of
his freshest and fullest works is the Humoreske
(op. 20), the most wonderful portrayal of a
humorous disposition that it is possible to ima
gine in music. Schumann's thorough individu
ality is prominent, both in harmonies, rhythm,
and colouring, and in the forms of the melodies.
It is, however, characteristic of his early PF.
works that broad bold melodies rarely occur in
them, though there is a superabundance of
melodic fragments — germs of melody, as they
might be called, full of a deep expression of their
own. This music is pervaded by a Spring-like
animation and force, a germ of future promise,
which gives it a peculiar romantic character ;
a character strengthened by the admixture of
poetic moods and feelings. Schumann was both
musician and poet, and he who would thoroughly
understand his music must be first imbued
with the spirit of the G erman poets who were
most prominent in Schumann's youth; above all
others Jean Paul and the whole romantic school,
particularly Eichendorff, Heine, and Riickert.
And just as these poets were specially great in
short lyrics, revealing endless depths- of feel
ing in a few lines, so did Schumann succeed,
as no one has done before or since, in saying
great things and leaving unutterable things to
be felt, in the small form of a. short pianoforte
piece.
Schumann's enthusiastic admiration and
thorough appreciation of Bach has been already
described. He shared this with Mendelssohn, but
it is certain that he entered more thoroughly
than Mendelssohn did into the old master's
mysterious depth of feeling. It would therefore
have been wonderful if he had not attempted
to express himself in the musical forms used
by Bach. His strong natural inclination towards
polyphonic writing is perceptible even in his
earliest pianoforte works, but it was not until
1840 that it comes prominently forward. His
six fugues on the name ' Bach ' (op. 60), the
four fugues (op. 72), the seven pianoforte pieces
in fughetta form (op. 126), the studies in canon
form for the pedal-piano (op. 56), and the other
separate canons and fugues scattered up and
down his pianoforte works — all form a class in
modern pianoforte music just as new as do his
pianoforte works in the free style. The treatment
of the parts in the fugues is by no means always
strictly according to rule, even when viewed
from the standpoint of Bach, who allowed himself
considerable freedom. In employing an accom-
SCHUMANN.
411
paniinent of chords in one part, he also goes far
beyond what had hitherto been considered allow
able. But yet, taken as a whole, these works are
masterpieces ; no other composer of modern times
could have succeeded as he has done in welding
together so completely the modern style of feeling
with the old strict form, or in giving that form
a new life and vigour by means of the modern
spirit. In these pieces we hear the same Schu
mann whom we know in his other works ; his
ideas adapt themselves as- if spontaneously to
the strict requirements of the polyphonic style,
and these requirements again draw from his
imagination new and characteristic ideas. In
short, though a great contrapuntist he was
not a pedantic one, and he may be numbered
among the few musicians of the last hundred
years to whom polyphonic forms have been
a perfectly natural means of expressing their
ideas.
As a composer of Songs Schumann stands by
the side of Schubert and Mendelssohn, the
youngest of the trio of great writers in this class
of music. Schubert shows the greatest wealth
of melody, Mendelssohn the most perfect round
ness of form ; but Schumann is by far the most
profoundly and intellectually suggestive. He
displays a more finely cultivated poetic taste
than Schubert, with a many-sided feeling for
lyric expression far greater than Mendelssohn's.
Many of his melodies are projected in bold and
soaring lines such as we meet with in no other
composer but Schubert ; for instance, in the
well-known songs ' Du meine Seele, du mem
Herz' (op. 25, no. i), 'Lied der Braut' (op. 25,
no. 12), ' Liebesbotschaft ' (op. 36, no. 6), 'Stille
Thranen' (op. 35, no. 10), and others. Still more
frequently he throws himself into the spirit of
the German Yolkslied, and avails himself of its
simpler and narrower forms of melody. Indeed
his songs owe their extraordinary popularity
chiefly to this conspicuously national element.
The reader need only be reminded of the song
'O Sonnenschein ' (op. 36, no. 4), of Heine's
' Liederkreis ' (op. 24), and of the Heine songs
'Hor' ich das Liedchen klingen,' ' AUnachtlich im
Traume,' 'Aus alien Marchen' (op. 48, nos. 10,
14, 15), of most of the songs and ballads (op.
45' 49' 53)5 and above all of the Wanderlied
' Wohlauf, noch getrunken den funkelnden Wein*
(op. 35, no. 3), which sparkles with youthful life
and healthy vigour. Besides these there are many
songs in which the melody is hardly worked out,
and which are— as is also frequently the case
with his pianoforte works — as it were, mere
essays, or germs, of melodies. This style of treat
ment, which is quite peculiar to Schumann, he
was fond of using when he wished to give the
impression of a vague, dreamy, veiled sentiment ;
and by this means he penetrated more deeply
into the vital essence and sources of feeling than
any other song-writer. Such a song as 'Der
Nussbaum' (op. 25, no. 3), or ' Im Walde,' by
Eichendorff (op. 39, no. n) are masterpieces in
this kind. Besides this, Schumann always brought
a true poet's instinct to bear on the subtlest
412
SCHUMANN.
touches and most covert suggestions in the poems
which he chose for setting, and selected the
musical expression best fitted to their purport.
Schubert and Mendelssohn set verses to tunes,
Schumann wrote poems to them in music. He
was the first who ventured to close on the
dominant seventh when his text ended with a
query (as in op. 49, no. 3). With him also
the vocal part often does not end on the com
mon chord, but the true close is left to the
accompaniment, so as to give an effect of vague
and undefined feeling. The part filled by the
pianoforte in Schumann's songs is a very im
portant one. With Schubert and Mendelssohn
we may very properly speak of the pianoforte
part as an 'accompaniment/ however rich and
independent it occasionally appears. But with
Schumann the word is no longer appropriate, the
pianoforte asserts its dignity and equality with
the voice ; to perform his songs satisfactorily the
player must enter fully into the singer's part
and the singer into the player's, and they must
constantly supplement and fulfil each other. It
was evidently of moment in the history of his art
that Schumann should have come to the work of
writing songs after ten years' experience as a
composer for the pianoforte, and after institut
ing an entirely new style of pianoforte music.
This style supplied him with an immense variety
of delicate and poetic modes and shades of expres
sion, and it is owing to this that he displays such
constant novelty in his treatment of the pianoforte
part. The forms of phrase which he adopts in
his ' accompaniments ' are infinitely various, and
always correspond with perfect fitness and in
genuity to the character of the verses. In some
cases the pianoforte part is an entirely independent
composition, which the voice merely follows with
a few declamatory phrases (op. 48, no. 9, 'Das
ist ein Floten und Geigen ') ; while in others, in
contrast to this, the voice stands almost alone,
and the pianoforte begins by throwing in a few
soft chords which nevertheless have their due
characteristic effect (op. 48, no. 13, 'Ich hab' im
Traum1). In Schumann's songs the proper
function of the pianoforte is to reveal some deep
and secret meaning which it is beyond the power
of words, even of sung words, to express ; and he
always disliked and avoided those repetitions of
the words of which other composers have availed
themselves in order to fill out in the music the
feeling to which the words give rise. When he
does repeat he always seems to have a special
dramatic end in view rather than a musical
one, and often makes the piano supplement the
sentiment aroused by the text, while the voice is
silent. He is particularly strong in his final sym
phonies, to which he gave a value and import
ance, as an integral portion of the song, which
no one before him had ventured to do, often
assigning to it a new and independent musical
thought of its own. Sometimes he allows the
general feeling of the song to reappear in it
under quite a new light ; sometimes the musical
phrase suggests some final outcome of the words,
opening to the fancy a remote perspective in
SCHUMANN:
which sight is lost (a beautiful example is op. 48,
no. 1 6, ' Die alten bosen Lieder '). Nay he even
continues the poem in music ; of which a striking
instance is the close of the 'Frauenliebe und
Leben' (op. 42), where by repeating the music of
the first song he revives in the fancy of the lonely
widow the memory of her early happiness. The
realm of feeling revealed to us in Schumann's
songs is thoroughly youthful, an unfailing mark
of the true lyric ; the sentiment he principally
deals with is that of love, which in his hands
is especially tender and pure, almost maidenly
coy. The set of songs called ' Frauenliebe und
Leben' — the Love and Life of Woman — gives
us a deep insight into the most subtle and
secret emotions of a pure woman's soul, deeper
indeed than could have been expected from any
man, and in fact no composer but Schumann
would have been capable of it. The author of the
words, A. von Chamisso, elegant as his verses are,
lags far behind the composer in his rendering.
But indeed such depths of feeling can be sounded
by music alone.
Schumann also found musical equivalents and
shades of colour for Eichendorff 's mystical views
of nature ; his settings of Eichendorff 's poems
may be called absolutely classical, and he is
equally at home in dealing with the bubbling
freshness or the chivalrous sentiment of the poet.
Many of Schumann's fresh and sparkling songs
have a touch of j;he student's joviality, but with
out descending from their high distinction ; never
under any circumstances was he trivial. Indeed
he had no sympathy with the farcical, though his
talent for the humorous is amply proved by his
songs. A masterpiece of the kind is the setting
of Heine's poem ' Ein Jiingling liebt ein Madchen'
(op. 48, no. u), which has been very unneces
sarily objected to. It was principally in dealing
with Heine's words that he betrays this sense of
humour ; ' Wir sassen am Fischerhause ' (op. 45,
no. 3) is an example, and still more 'Es leuchtet
meine Liebe' (op. 127, no. 3), where a resem
blance to the scherzo of the A minor String
Quartet is very obvious. A thing which may
well excite astonishment as apparently quite
beside the nature of Schumann's character, is
that he could even find characteristic music for
Heine's bitterest irony (op. 24, no. 6) ' Warte,
warte, wilder Schiffsmann.' But he was through
out and above all romantic.
Schumann's Symphonies may without any
injustice be considered as the most important
which have been written since Beethoven.
Though Mendelssohn excels him in regularity of
form, and though Schubert's C major Symphony
is quite unique in its wealth of beautiful musical
ideas, yet Schumann surpasses both in greatness
and force. He is the man, they the youths ; he
has the greatest amount of what is demanded by
that greatest, most mature, and most important
of all forms of instrumental music. He comes
near to Beethoven, who it is quite evident was
almost the only composer that, he ever took as
a model. No trace whatever of Haydn or Mozart
is to be found in his symphonies, and of Men-
SCHUMANN.
delssohn just as little. A certain approximation
to Schubert is indeed perceptible in the ' work
ing out' (Diirchfuhrung} of his Allegro move
ments. But the symphonies, like the pianoforte
works, the songs, and indeed all that Schumann
produced, bear the strong impress of a marvel
lous originality, and a creative power all his
own. Even the first published Symphony (in
Bb, op. 38) shows a very distinct talent for this
branch of composition. We do not know that
Schumann had ever previously attempted or
chestral compositions, except in the case of the
symphony written in the beginning of 1830,
which still remains in MS. In 1839 he writes
to Dora : ' At present it is true that I have not
had much practice in orchestral writing, but I
hope to master it some day.' And in his next
attempt he attained his object. In a few pas
sages in the Bb Symphony, the effects of the
instruments are indeed not rightly calculated.
One great error in the first movement he re
medied after the first hearing. This was in the
two opening bars, from which the theme of the
Allegro is afterwards generated, and which were
given to the horns and trumpets. It ran origin
ally thus, in agreement with the beginning of
the Allegro movement :
SCHUMANN.
413
/T\
which, on account of the G and A being stopped
notes, had an unexpected and very comic effect.
Schumann himself was much amused at the
mistake ; when he was at Hanover in January
1854 ne t°ld the story to his friends, and it was
very amusing to hear this man, usually so grave
and silent, regardless of the presence of strangers
(for the incident took place at a public restaurant),
sing out the first five notes of the subject quite
loud, the two next in a muffled voice, and the
last again loud. He placed the phrase a third
higher, as it stands in the printed score :
9—
H-
•7T
-•-
—*——»-» •-•
1C
- - -j
^
J?-
^
-1—
T u r
f r
Another, but less important passage for the horns
has remained unaltered. In bar 17 of the first
Allegro, Schumann thought that this phrase
?r^-
— u
5:
> n
ought to be made more prominent than it usually
was on the horns, and requested both Taubert
and David, when it was in rehearsal at Berlin
and Leipzig in the winter of 1842, to have it
played on the trombones.
But in general we cannot but wonder at the
certain mastery over his means that he shows
even in the ist Symphony. His orchestra
tion is less smooth and clear than that of either
Mendelssohn or G;ide, and in its sterner style
reminds us rather of Schubert. But this stern
power is suited to the substance of his ideas,
and there is no lack of captivating beauty of
sound. We even meet in his orchestral works
with a number of new effects of sound such as
only true genius can discover or invent. In
stances of these are the treatment of the three
trombones in the 'Manfred' Overture, the use
made of the horns in the second movement of the
Eb Symphony, the violin solo introduced into
the Romanza of the D minor Symphony, etc. etc.
It is hard to decide which of Schumann's four
symphonies (or five, counting op. 52) is the finest.
Each has individual beauties of its own. In life
and freshness and the feeling of inward happiness
the Bb Symphony stands at the head. Schumann
originally intended to call it the 'Spring Sym
phony'; and indeed he wrote it, as we learn
from a letter to Taubert, in Feb. 1841, when the
first breath of spring was in the air. The first
movement was to have been called 'Spring's
Awakening,' and the Finale (which he always
wished not to be taken too fast) ' Spring's Fare
well.' Many parts of the symphony have an
especial charm when we thus know the object
with which they were written. The beginning
of the introduction evidently represents a trum
pet summons sent pealing down from on high ;
then gentle zephyrs blow softly to and fro, and
everywhere the dormant forces awake and make
their way to the light (we are quoting from the
composer's own programme). In the Allegro
the Spring comes laughing in, in the full beauty
of youth.1 This explains and justifies the novel
use of the triangle in the first movement — an
instrument not properly admissible in a sym
phony. An enchanting effect is produced by
the Spring song at the close of the first move
ment, played as though sung with a full heart ;
and it is an entirely new form of coda (see p. 67
of the score). In publishing the Symphony,
Schumann omitted the explanatory titles, because
he believed that the attention of the public is
distracted from the main purpose of a work by
things of that kind. We may well believe, more
over, that a good part of the spring-like feeling
in this symphony comes from the deep and heart
felt joy which Schumann felt at being at last
united to his hardly- won bride. The same in
fluence is seen in the D minor Symphony (op.
120), written in the same year with that just
described, and immediately after it. It is entirely
similar to its predecessor in its fundamental
feeling, but has more passion. The form too is
new and very successful ; the four sections follow
each other consecutively without any pauses, so
that the work seems to consist of only one great
movement. The subjects of the Introduction re
appear in the Komanze, with different treatment,
and the chief subject of the first Allegro is the
foundation of that of the last. The second part
of the first Allegro is in quite an unusual form,
and before the last Allegro we find a slow intro
duction — imaginative, majestic, and most original.
As has been already mentioned, Schumann in
tended to call the work ' Symphonic Fantasia.'
1 Schumann Intended the Piit vivace of the Introduction to be
taken distinctly faster at once, so that the time might glide imper
ceptibly into the Allegro.
414
SCHUMANN.
Here too poetic pictures seem to be hovering
round him on every side.
His third symphonic work of the year 1841 is
also irregular, but only in form, and has as good a
right as the second to the name of ' Symphony.'
It appeared, however, under the name ' Overture,
Scherzo, and Finale,' as op. 52. Of this work,
which is charming throughout, the first move
ment offers us the only example to be found in
Schumann of the influence of Cherubini, a master
for whom he had a great reverence. Perhaps
the most lovely movement is the highly poetic
Scherzo in gigue-rhythm, which might constitute
a type by itself among symphony-scherzos. His
other scherzos approximate in style to those of
Beethoven, whose invention and speciality this
form was, and who had no successor in it but
Schumann. The characteristic of the C major
Symphony (op. 61) is a graver and more mature
depth of feeling ; its bold decisiveness of form
and overpowering wealth of expression reveal
distinctly the relationship in art between Schu
mann and Beethoven. The form too, as far as
regards the number and character of the move
ments, is quite that of the classical masters, while
in the last symphony (Eb, op. 97) Schumann
once more appears as one of the modern school.
This is divided into five separate movements, in
cluding a slow movement in sustained style, and
of a devotional character between the Andante
and the Finale. Schumann originally inscribed
it with the word,s ' In the style of an accom
paniment to a solemn ceremony ' (im Charakter
der Begleitung einen feierlichen Ceremonie), and
we know that it was suggested to him by the sight
of Cologne cathedral, and the festivities on the
occasion of Archbishop von Geissel's elevation to
the Cardinalate. The other movements are power
ful, and full of variety and charm, and the whole
symphony is full of vivid pictures of Rhineland
life. Perhaps the gem of the whole is the second
movement (Scherzo), in which power and beauty
are mingled with the romance which in every
German heart hovers round the Rhine and its
multitude of songs and legends. Although written
in 1850, when Schumann's imagination was be
coming exhausted, the work bears no trace of
any diminution of power.
The poetical concert-overture, invented by
Mendelssohn, and practised by Bennett and
Gade, was a form never cultivated by Schu
mann. His overtures are really 'opening pieces,'
whether to opera, play, or some festivity or
other. In this again he follows Beethoven.
His overtures, like those of Beethoven, are most
effective in the concert-room, when the drama
or occasion for which they were composed is
kept in mind. It is so even with the wonder
ful ' Genoveva ' overture, which contains some
thing of Weber's power and swing; but more
than all is it true of the overture to Byron's
' Manfred,' so full of tremendous passion. None
of the overtures subsequently written by Schu
mann reached this degree of perfection, least
of all his ' Faust ' overture, though that to
the 'Braut von Messina' (op. 100) is not much
SCHUMANN.
inferior to ' Manfred.' In the last year of his
productive activity Schumann was much oc
cupied with this form, but the exhausted con
dition of his creative powers cannot be dis
guised, either in the ' Faust ' overture or in those
to Shakespeare's 'Julius Coesar ' (op. 128) and
Goethe's 'Hermann und Dorothea' (op. 136),
which last he had intended to set as an opera.
The festival overture on the ' Rheinweinlied' (op.
123) is cleverly worked, and a very effective
pi&ce $ occasion.
It was in the spring of 1838 that Schumann
made his first attempt, so far as we know, at
a String Quartet. It was scarcely successful, for
he was too much immersed in pianoforte music;
at any rate the world has hitherto seen nothing
of it. In June and July 1842 he was much more
•successful. The three string quartets (op. 41),
written at this time, are the only ones that have
become known. They cannot be said to be in
the purest quartet style ; but as Schumann never
played any stringed instrument, this is not sur
prising. They still retain much of the pianoforte
style ; but even by this means Schumann attains
many new and beautiful effects. In several places
the influence of Beethoven is clearly discernible ;
especially in the Adagio of the A minor and the
Adagio-variations of the F major Quartet. On
the other hand, the 'Quasi Trio' in the style of
a gavotte, in the Finale of the A major, shows
an affinity with Bach (compare the gavotte in
the sixth of the so-called ' French suites ' in
E major), though not as something appropriated
from without, but rather as an individuality de
veloped from within. At the same time the
Scherzo of the A minor Quartet is an example
of how a fleeting impression often becomes fixed
in an independently creative imagination, until
it reaches a more perfect degree of development.
At the time of writing this quartet Schumann had
become acquainted with Marschner's G minor
Trio (op. 112), and speaks of it in the Zeitschrift.
The fine scherzo of that work struck him very
much, and in his own scherzo it reappears, in a
modified form certainly, but yet recognisable
enough. In spite of this plagiarism however
we must allow the quartet to be in the highest
degree original, and full of richness and poetry.
It contains much enchanting beauty, never sur
passed even by Schumann. He seems here to
have resumed his practice of mixing up poetic
mysticism with his music. What other reason
could there be for proposing to use the four
bars of modulation from the first quartet (bars
30-34), exactly as they stand, for an introduction
to the second quartet ? He afterwards struck
them out, as may be seen in the autograph.
The other quartets also arrived at their present
form only after manifold alterations. The slow
introduction to the A minor Quartet was at first
intended to be played con sordini. The third
quartet began with a chord of the 6-5 on D, held
out for a whole bar. The greatest alterations
were made in the first Allegro of the A minor and
in the variations in Ab of the F major Quartets.
Whole sections were re-written and modified in
SCHUMANN.
various ways. But Wasielewski is mistaken in
saying (3rd ed. p. 178, note) that the piii lento
over the coda in these variations is a misprint
for piu mosso. Schumann wrote piii lento quite
plainly, and evidently meant what he wrote.
He may possibly have changed his mind after
wards, for in regard to tempo he was often
accessible to the opinions of otheTs.
Of the works for strings and pianoforte, the
Quintet (op. 44) is of course the finest. Nay
more : it is undoubtedly the best piece of cham
ber music since Beethoven, and will always keep
its place in the first rank of musical masterpieces.
This quintet claims the highest admiration, not
only because of its brilliant originality, and its
innate power — which seems to grow with every
movement, and at the end of the whole leaves
the hearer with a feeling of the possibility of
never-ending increase — but also because of its
gorgeous beauty of sound, and the beautiful and
well-balanced relations between the pianoforte
and the strings. Musicians are still living, like
Carl Keinecke of Leipzig, who at the time of its
appearance were in the most susceptible period
of youth, and who tell of the indescribable im
pression the work made upon them. It must
have seemed like a new paradise of beauty re
vealed to their view. The Pianoforte Quartet
(op. 47) only wants animation, and a more
popular character in the best sense of the word,
to make it of equal merit with the Quintet.
There is much in it of the spirit of Bach, as is
perhaps most evident in the wonderful melody of
the Andante. A high rank is taken by the Trios
in D minor (op. 63) and F major (op. 80), both,
as well as the quintet and quartet, written in
one and the same year. In the first a passionate
and sometimes gloomy character predominates,
while the second is more cheerful and full of
warmth in the middle movements. The canonic
style is employed in the Adagios of both trios
with new and powerful effect. The treatment of
the strings with respect to the pianoforte may
here and there be considered too orchestral in
style ; but it must not be forgotten that it was
adopted to suit the piano style, which in Schu
mann is very different from that of the classical
masters and of Mendelssohn. The two trios,
however, are wanting in that expression of perfect
health which is so prominent in both the quintet
and the quartet. They show traces of the hurry
and breathless haste which in his later years
increases the complication of his rhythms. The
third and last Trio (G- minor, op. no) is far
inferior to the others. There is still the same
artistic design, and in isolated passages the noble
genius of the master still shines clearly out ; but
as a whole this trio tells of exhaustion. The
same may be said of most of the other chamber
works of Schumann's latest years. Among them
are two sonatas for piano and violin, gloomy,
impassioned compositions, which can hardly be
listened to without a feeling of oppression. There
are also a number of shorter pieces for different
instruments, among which the ' Marchenbilder
fiir Pianoforte und Viola' (op. 113) are promi-
SCHUMANN.
415
nent. No one who bears in mind Schumann's
ultmate fate can hear without emotion the last
of these ' Marchenbilder,' which bears the direc
tion 'Langsam, mifc melancholischem Ausdruck'
(Slowly, with an expression of melancholy).
In the sphere of the concerto Schumann has
left an imperishable trace of his genius in the
Pianoforte Concerto in A minor (op. 54). It is
one of his most beautiful and mature works. In
addition to all his peculiar originality it has also
the qualities, which no concerto should lack,
of external brilliancy, and striking, powerful,
well rounded subjects. The first movement is
written in a free form with happy effect ; the
cause being that Schumann had at first intended
it to stand as an independent piece, with the title
4 Fantasia.' He did not add the other two move
ments until two years afterwards. — The ' Intro
duction und Allegro appassionato,' for pianoforte
and orchestra (op. 92), is a rich addition to
concerto literature. In Schumann there is a
deeper connection between the pianoforte and
orchestra than had before been customary, though
not carried to such a point as to interfere with the
contrast between the two independent powers.
He was far from writing symphonies with the
pianoforte olbligata. His other works in concerto-
form, written in the last years of his life, do
not attain to the height of the Concerto. .Among
them is an unpublished violin concerto written
between Sept. 21 and Oct. 3, 1853, and consist
ing of the following movements: (i) D minor
alia breve, ' Im kraftigen, nicht zu schnellen
Tempo'; (2)Bb major, common time, 'Langsam';
(3) D major, 3-4, 'Lebhaft, doch nicht zu
schnell.' The autograph is in the possession of
Joachim. A Fantasia for violin and orchestra,
dedicated to the same great artist, is published
as op. 131. The Violoncello Concerto (op. 129)
is remarkable for a very beautiful slow middle
movement. There is also a Concerto for four
horns and orchestra (op. 86). Schumann himself
thought very highly of this piece, partly because,
as he wrote to Dr. Hartel, ' it was quite curious.'
It is indeed the only attempt made in modern
times to revive the form of the old Concerto grosso
which Sebastian Bach had brought to perfection
in his six so-called 'Brandenburg' concertos.
As these concertos of Bach were not printed
until 1850, and Schumann can scarcely have
known them in manuscript, it is a remarkable
and interesting coincidence that he should thus
have followed Bach's lead without knowing it.
The piece is particularly hard for the first horn,
because of the high notes. When well rendered
it has a peculiarly sonorous, often very romantic
effect, to which however the ear soon becomes
insensible from the tone of the four horns.
In his account of Marschner's 'Klange aus
Osten,' a work performed in Leipzig on Oct. 22,
1840, Schumann says: 'We must admire the
pattern which the composer has felt himself en
couraged to set, and which others need only
follow, to enrich the concert-room with a new
form of music.' The * Klange aus Osten ' consist
of an overture, solos, and choruses, and treat of
416
SCHUMANN.
the adventures of a pair of lovers in the East.
By the term 'new form of music' Schumann
means a form in which it was possible to make
use for concert performances of romantic stories,
which had hitherto been only used on the stage.
He was the first to follow this example in his
'Paradise and the Peri.' The text was taken
from Moore's poem, of which Schumann short
ened some parts to suit his purpose, while he
lengthened others by his own insertions. It was
his first work for voices and orchestra, and is one
of his greatest and most important. The subject
was happily chosen. The longing felt by one
of those ideal beings created by the imagination
from the forces of nature, to attain or regain
a higher and happier existence, and using every
means for the fulfilment of this longing, is
of frequent occurrence in the German popular
legends, and is still a favourite and sympathetic
idea in Germany. It is the root of the legends
of the Fair Melusina, of the Water Nixie, and of
Hans Heiling. Schumann's fancy must have
been stimulated by the magic of the East, no
less than by Moore's poem, with its poetic pic
tures displayed on a background of high moral
sentiment. It has been very unnecessarily ob
jected to ' Paradise and the Peri ' that it follows
none of the existing forms of music. If it be
necessary for the enjoyment of a work of art that
it should be ticketed after some known pattern,
it is obvious that this one belongs to the class of
Oratorio. That the oratorio may be secular as
well as sacred was shown by Handel, and con
firmed by Haydn in his ' Seasons.' For the text
no especial poetic form is required. It may be
dramatic or narrative, or a mixture of the two ;
Handel has left examples of each. The essential
characteristic of an oratorio is that it should
bring the feelings into play, not directly, as is
done in the cantata, but by means of a given
event, about which the emotions can be aroused.
The form of the poetry, the choice of material
and form in the music, should all depend upon
the particular subject to be treated. The fact of
Schumann's having retained so much of Moore's
narrative is worthy of all praise ; it is the de
scriptive portions of the poem that have the
greatest charm, and the music conforms to this.
To call this method an imitation of the music of
the Evangelist in Bach's Passion Music is un
necessary and untrue ; for the narrative portions
are given by Schumann both to solos and chorus.
True, there will always be a certain disadvantage
in using a complete self-contained poem as a text
for music, a great deal of which will inevitably
have been written without regard to the com
poser. Much that we pass over lightly in read
ing has, when set to music, a more definite and
insistent effect than was intended. In other
places again, the poem, from the musician's point
of view, will be deficient in opportunities for the
strong contrasts so nece-sary for effect in music.
This is very obvious in Schumann's composition.
The third portion of the work, although he took
much trouble to give it greater variety by addi
tions to the poetry, suffers from a certain mono-
SCHUMANN.
tony. Not that the separate numbers are weaker
than those of the former parts, but they are
wanting in strong shadows. But there is some
thing else that prevents the work from producing
a really striking effect upon large audiences,
and that is, if we may say so, that there is too
much music in it. Schumann brought it forth
from the fulness of his heart, and threw, even
into its smallest interludes, all the depth of ex
pression of which he was capable. The beauties
are crowded together, and stand in each other's
light. If they had been fewer in number they
would have had more effect. But, with all these
allowances, ' Paradise and the Peri ' is one of the
most enchanting musical poems in existence. And
we can now confirm his own words in a letter
to a friend after the completion of the work :
'A soft voice within me kept saying while I
wrote, It is not in vain that thou art writing' ;
for this composition will go far to make him
immortal. No comparison is possible between
it and the great oratorios of Mendelssohn, with
their grand structure and historical character.
Its object is wholly different — to lead us into the
bright magical fairy-world of the East, and make
us sympathise with the sorrows and the struggles
of a gentle daughter of the air. It can only be
really impressive to a somewhat small circle.
The more so that the chorus, the chief means for
representing broad and popular emotions, has
only a moderate share in the work. All the
choruses in 'Paradise and the Peri,' perhaps
with the exception of the last, are fine, original,
and effective. But it must be admitted that
choral composition was not really Schumann's
strong point. In this respect he is far inferior
to Mendelssohn. In many of his choruses he
might even seem to lack the requisite mastery
over the technical requirements of choral com
position, so instrumental in style, so imprac
ticable and unnecessarily difficult do they seem.
But if we consider Schumann's skill in poly
phonic writing, and recall pieces of such grand
conception and masterly treatment as the begin
ning of the last chorus of the Faust music, we
feel convinced that the true reason of the defect
lies deeper. The essential parts of a chorus are
large and simple subjects, broad and flowing
development, and divisions clearly marked and
intelligible to all. In a good chorus there must
be something to speak to the heart of the masses.
Schumann took exactly the opposite view. The
chorus was usually an instrument unfitted for the
expression of his ideas. His genius could have
mastered the technical part of choral composition
as quickly and surely as that of orchestral com
position. But since the case was otherwise, the
chief importance of ' Paradise and the Peri is
seen to be in the solos and their accompaniments,
especially in the latter, for here the orchestra
stands in the same relation to the voice as the
pianoforte does in Schumann's songs. A good
orchestral rendering of ' Paradise and the Peri
is a task of the greatest difficulty, but one re
warded by perfect enjoyment. Compositions such
as this, as we have already said, correspond in.
SCHUMANN.
the concert-room to the German romantic opera.
' Paradise and the Peri ' may be likened to We
ber's 'Oberon,' and Mendelssohn's 'First Wal-
purgisnight' to Weber's ' Der Freischutz.'
In the fairy-tale of 'The Pilgrimage of the
Rose' (op. 112) Schumann intended to produce
a companion picture to ' Paradise and the Peri,'
but in less definite outline and vaguer colours.
The idea of the poem is similar to that of the
former work, but Horn's execution of the idea
is entirely without taste. Schumann was possibly
attracted by its smooth versification and a few
really good musical situations. The music con
tains much that is airy and fresh, as well as a
beautiful dirge. On the other hand, it is full
of a feeble sentimentality utterly foreign to Schu
mann's general character, and ascribable only to
the decay of his imagination, The insignificant
and wholly idyllic subject was quite inadequate
to give employment to the whole apparatus of
golo, chorus, and orchestra, and Schumann's first
idea of providing a pianoforte accompaniment only
was the right one. With a small section of Schu
mann's admirers the work will always keep its
place, and produce a pleasing though not very
deep effect. His other works in this form consist
of four ballads: — 'Der Konigssohn' (op. 116),
'Des Sangers Fluch' (op. 139), 'Das Gliick von
Edenhall' (op. 143), all by Uhland; and <Vom
Pagen und der Konigstochter' (op. 140), by
Geibel. Moore's 'Paradise and the Peri' was
peculiarly fitted for musical treatment, and lent
itself happily to it. And it will always be easier
to extract an available text from a poem of large
dimensions, than from a ballad of more concise
form. This Schumann had to find out by ex
perience. His chief error was not in taking
widely-known masterpieces of German poetry
and curtailing or even re-arranging them to
suit his purpose ; Ubland's and Geibel's poems
remain as they were, and a musician must always
be permitted to take his subjects wherever and
however he likes. He is rather to be blamed for
not going far enough in his alterations, and for
retaining too much of the original form of the
ballad. What has been already said with regard
to ' Paradise and the Peri ' holds good here too,
and in a greater degree. It is painfully evident
that these ballads were not really written for
music. The way the principal events of the story
are described, and the whole. outward form of the
verses, imply that they were intended to be
recited by a single person, and that not a singer
but a speaker. If necessary to be sung, the form
of a strophic song should have been chosen, as is
the case with 'Das Gliick von Edenhall,' but this
would confine the varieties of expression within
too narrow a range. It is as though Schumann's
pent-up desire for the dramatic form were seeking
an outlet in these ballads ; especially as we know
that in the last years of his creative activity he
was anxious to meet with a new opera-libretto.
The faults of texts and subjects might however be
overlooked, if the music made itself felt as the
product of a rich and unwearied imagination.
Unfortunately, however, this is seldom the case.
VOL. in. PT, 3.
SCHUMANN.
417
It is just in the more dramatic parts that we
detect an obvious dulness in the music, a lame
ness in rhythm, and a want of fresh and happy
contrasts. It must be remarked, however, that
isolated beauties of no mean order are to be
met with ; such as the whole of the third part
and the beginning and end of the second, in the
ballad ' Vom Pagen und der Konigstochter.'
These works, however, taken as a whole, will
hardly live.
On the other hand, there are some works of
striking beauty for voices and orchestra in a
purely lyrical vein. Among these should be men
tioned the ' Requiem for Mignon' from ' Wilhelm
Meister' (op. 986), and Hebbel's ' Nachtlied '
(op. 1 08). The former of these was especially
written for music, and contains the loveliest
thoughts and words embodied in an unconstrained
and agreeable form. Few composers were so well
fitted for such a work as Schumann, with his
sensitive emotional faculty and his delicate sense
of poetry ; and it is no wonder that he succeeded
in producing this beautiful little composition.
But it should never be heard in a large concert
room, for which its delicate proportions and tender
colouring are utterly unfitted. The ' Nachtlied '
is a long choral movement. The peculiar and
fantastic feeling of the poem receives adequate
treatment by a particular style in which the
chorus is sometimes used only to give colour,
and sometimes is combined with the orchestra
in a polyphonic structure, in which all human
individuality seems to be merged, and only the
universal powers of nature and of life reign
supreme.
Beethoven, as is well known, had the intention
of setting Goethe's ' Faust' to music. Of course
the first part only was in his mind, for the second
did not appear until six years after his death.
The idea conceived by Beethoven was executed
by Schumann ; not, it may be, in Beethoven's
manner, but perhaps in the best and most effective
way conceivable. Schumann's music is not in
tended to be performed on the stage as the musical
complement of Goethe's drama. It is a piece
for concert performance, or rather a set of pieces,
for he did not stipulate or intend that all three
parts should be given together. What he did
was to take out a number of scenes from both
parts of Goethe's poem, and set music to them.
It follows that the work is not self-contained, but
requires for its full understanding an accurate
knowledge of the poem. From the First Part he
took the following : — (i) Part of the first scene
in the garden between Gretchen and Faust ; (2)
Gretchen before the shrine of the Mater dolorosa ;
(3) The scene in the Cathedral. These three
form the first division of his Faust music. From
the Second Part of the play he adopted : (i) The
first scene of the first act (the song of the spirits
at dawn, the sunrise, and Faust's soliloquy) ; (2)
The scene with the four aged women from the
fifth act ; (3) Faust's death in the same act (as
far as the words, ' Der Zeiger fallt — Er fallt, es
ist vollbracht '). These form the second division
of the music. Schumann's third division consists
Ee
418
SCHUMANN.
of the last scene of the fifth act (Faust's glori
fication) divided into seven numbers. The ex
periment of constructing a work of art, without
central point or connection in itself, but entirely
dependent for these on another work of art, could
only be successful in the case of a poem like
' Faust ' ; and even then perhaps, only with the
German people, with whom Faust is almost as
familiar as Luther's Bible. But it really was
successful, and Schumann's name will be eternally
linked with that of Goethe. This is the case
more particularly in the third division, which
consists of only one great scene, and is the most
important from a musical point of view. In this
scene Goethe himself desired the co-operation of
music. Its mystic import and splendid expres
sion could find no composer so well fitted as
Schumann, who seemed, as it were, predestined
for it. He threw himself into the spirit of the
poem with such deep sympathy and understand
ing, that from beginning to end his music gives the
impression of being a commentary on it. To
Schumann is due the chief meed of praise for
having popularized the second part of Faust. In
musical importance no other choral work of his
approaches the third division of his work. In fresh
ness, originality, and sustained power of invention
it is in no way inferior to ' Paradise and the Peri.'
Up to about the latter half of the last chorus it
is a chain of musical gems, a perfectly unique
contribution to concert literature, in the first rank
of those works of art of which the German nation
may well be proud. The second division of the
Faust music, consisting of three other scenes from
the Second Part of the poem, is also of considerable
merit. It is, however, evident in many passages
that Schumann has set words which Goethe
never intended to be sung. This is felt still
more in the scenes from the First Part, which
are moreover very inferior in respect of the
music. The overture is the least important of
all; in fact the merit of the work decreases
gradually as we survey it backwards from the
end to the beginning ; a circumstance corre
sponding to the method pursued in its compo
sition, which began in Schumann's freshest, hap
piest, and most masterly time of creativeness, and
ended close upon the time when his noble spirit
was plunged in the dark gloom of insanity.
There exist only two dramatic works of Schu
mann's intended for the theatre : the opera of
' Genoveva ' and the music to Byron's ' Manfred.'
The text of the opera may justly be objected to,
for it scarcely treats of the proper legend of
Genoveva at all ; almost all that made the story
characteristic and touching being discarded, a
fact which Schumann thought an advantage.
This may perhaps be explained by remembering
his opinion that in an opera the greatest stress
should be laid on the representation of the emo
tions, and that this object might most easily be
attained by treating the external conditions of an
operatic story as simply and broadly as possible.
He also probably felt, that a great part of the
Genoveva legend is epic rather than dramatic.
He was mistaken, however, in thinking that
SCHUMANN.
after the reductions which he made in the plot,,
it would remain sufficiently interesting to the
general public. He himself, as we have said,
arranged his own libretto. His chief model was
Hebbel's ' Genoveva,' a tragedy which had
affected him in a wonderful way ; though he also
made use of Tieck's 'Genoveva.' Besides these
he took Weber's ' Euryanthe ' as a pattern. The
mixture of three poems, so widely differing from
one another, resulted in a confusion of motives
and an uncertainty of delineation which add to the
uninteresting impression produced by the libretto.
The character of Golo, particularly, is very in
distinctly drawn, and yet on him falls almost
the chief responsibility of the drama. The
details cannot but suffer by such a method of
compilation as this. A great deal is taken word
for word from Hebbel and Tieck, and their two
utterly different styles appear side by side with
out any compromise whatever. Hebbel however
predominates. Tieck's work appears in the finale
of the first act, and in the duet (No. 9) in the
second act, e.g. the line 'Du liebst mich, holde
Braut, da ist der Tag begonnen.' Genoveva' s
taunt on Golo's birth is also taken from Tieck,
although he makes the reproach come first from
Wolf and afterwards from Genoveva herself, but
without making it a prominent motive in the
drama. Beside this several Vblkslieder are
interspersed. This confusion of styles is sur
prising in a man of such fine discrimination
and delicate taste as Schumann displays else
where. The chief defect of the opera, however,
lies in the music. If ' Paradise and the Peri,'
as we have said, may be compared with Weber's
'Oberon/ the one holding the same place in the
concert-room that the other does on the stage,
Schumann's opera may be compared to one of
Weber's concert cantatas — say to ' Kampf und
Sieg.' As Weber always shows himself a dramatic
artist even where it is not required, so does
Schumann show himself a lyric artist. In the
opera of ' Genoveva, ' the characters all sing more
or less the same kind of music ; that which
Schumann puts to the words is absolute music,
not relative, i.e. such as would be accordant
with the character of each individual. Neither
in outline nor detail is his music sufficiently
generated by the situations of the drama. Lastly,
he lacks appreciation for that liveliness of con
trast which appears forced and out of place in
the concert-room, but is absolutely indispensable
on the stage. ' Genoveva ' has no strict recita
tives, but neither is there spoken dialogue ; even
the ordinary quiet parts of the dialogue are sung
in strict time, and usually accompanied with
the full orchestra. Schumann considered the
recitative a superannuated form of art, and in
his other works also makes scarcely any use of it,
This point is of course open to dispute ; but it is
not open to dispute that in an opera, some kind
of calm, even neutral form of expression is wanted,
which, while allowing the action to proceed
quickly, may serve as a foil to the chief parts
in which highly-wrought emotions are to be de
lineated. The want of such a foil in ' Genoveva'
SCHUMANN.
weakens the effect of the climaxes, and with
them, that of the whole. As in the formation
of the libretto Schumann took ' Euryanthe' as his
model, so. as a musician, he intended to carry out
Weber's intentions still farther, and to write, not
an opera in the old-fashioned ordinary sense, but
a music drama, which should be purely national.
At the time when ' Genoveva' was written, he was
utterly opposed to Italian music, not in the way
we should have expected him to be, but exactly
as Weber was opposed to it in Ins time. ' Let
me alone with your canary-bird music and your
tunes out of the waste-paper basket,' he once
said angrily to Weber's son, who was speaking
to him of Cimarosa's ' Matrimonio Segreto.' But
although he may not have succeeded in pro
ducing a masterpiece of German opera, we may
appreciate with gratitude the many beauties of
the music, the noble sentiment pervading the
whole, and the constant artistic feeling, directed
only to what is true and genuine. After the
experiments of the last ten years in Germany,
it seems not unlikely that ' Genoveva ' will yet
attain to a settled position on the stage. And well
does it deserve this place. The finest part of the
work is the overture, a masterpiece in its kind,
and worthy to rank with the classical models.
The music to Byron's 'Manfred' (op. 115) con
sists of an overture, an entr'acte, melodramas, and
several solos and choruses. Byron expressly de
sired the assistance of music for his work, though
not so much of it as Schumann has given. Schu
mann inserted all the instrumental pieces in the
work, with the exception of the tunes on the shep
herd's pipe in the first act ; also the requiem heard
at Manfred's death, sounding from the convent
church. On the other hand, it is remarkable that
he left the song of 'The captive usurper' in Act ii.
Scene iv. without music. The whole work consists
of 16 numbers, including the overture ; this Schu
mann composed first of all, and probably without
intending to write music for the drama itself. Even
here he does not evince any special gift for drama
tic writing. In the present day Byron's drama is
frequently performed upon the stage with Schu
mann's music, and its effectiveness can thus be
tested. The music hardly ever serves to intensify
the dramatic effects, and yet this is all that is
necessary in a drama. It appears rather to be
the outcome of the impression produced on Schu
mann by Byron's poem. There is one peculiarity
about the Manfred music. On the stage it loses
a great part of its effect, just as, in my opinion,
the poem loses half its fantastic and weird magic
by being dressed in the clumsy and palpable
illusions of a scenic representation. The over
ture is a piece of music of the most serious cha
racter, and much more fitted for concert per
formance than for assembling an audience in a
theatre. This is still more true of all the other
pieces, so delicate in construe; ion and subtle in
feeling, the closing requiem by no means ex
cluded. And yet in the concert-room the music
does not make its due effect ; partly because the
hearer is withdrawn from the influence of the
action, which is indispensable to the full under-
SCHUMANN.
419
standing of the whole work ; and also because in
the melodramas the spoken words and the music
which accompanies them disturb one another
more than when performed on the stage. From
these remarks it might be imagined that the
Manfred music is an inferior work ; but strange
to say such is by no means the case. It is a
splendid creation, and one of Schumann's most
inspired productions. It hovers between the
stage and the concert-room ; and, paradoxical as
it may seem, the deepest impression is produced
by reading the score, picturing in one's mind the
action and the spoken dialogue, and allowing
the music to sink deep into the ears of one's
mind. Perhaps the most striking parts of it
all are the melodramas, and among them the
deeply touching speech of Manfred to Astarte ;
and these all stand out with a peculiar purity
and unity, when read as just described. They
-are in a manner improvements upon those
highly poetic piano pieces of Schumann's with
superscriptions ; and we ought to think of the
words when hearing the piece. In this music, if
nowhere else, is revealed Schumann's character
istic struggle after the inward, to the disregard
of the outward, and we see how diametrically
opposed to his nature was the realisation of
dramatic effects where all is put into visible
and tangible form. But he devoted himself to
the composition of the Manfred music just as
if he had been fitted for it by nature. The
poet and the composer seem to have been des
tined for one another as truly as in the case of
the Faust music, but in a different way. Byrorv
had no idea of stage representation in writing
Manfred; he only wished his poem to be read.
Its romantic sublimity of thought, spurning all
firm foothold or support on the earth, could only
find its due completion in music such as this,
which satisfies the requirements of neither stage
nor concert room. That a work of art, mighty
and instinct with life, can be produced with a
sublime disdain of all limits set by circumstance,
provided only genius is at work upon it, is amply
proved by Byron and Schumann in this their
joint production. It has been already remarked
more than once that the gloomy, melancholy, and
passionate intensity of strife in Byron's Manfred,
heightened by contrast with the splendid descrip
tions of nature, corresponded to the conditions of
Schumann's spirit at the time when the music was
written. And indeed a deep sympathy speaks in
every bar. But there was in Schumann a long
ing for peace .and reconciliation, which is
wanting in Byron. This comes out very plainly
in different passages in the music, of which the
most striking is the ' Requiem' at the close, which
sheds over the whole work a gentle gleam of glory.
If we were to go into deta Is, we should neither
know where to begin nor to end.
In January 1851 Schumann wrote to a friend,
' It must always be the artist's highest aim to ap
ply his powers to sacred music. But in youth
we are firmly rooted to the earth by all our joys
and sorrows ; it is only with advancing age that
the branches stretch higher, and so I hope that
Ee2
420
SCHUMANN.
the period of my higher efforts is no longer
distant.' He is here speaking emphatically of
'sacred,' not of church music. Church music
he never wrote, his Mass and his Requiem not
withstanding. It should be adapted to the
church-services, and calculated to produce its
effect in combination with the customary cere
monial ; but sacred or religious music is intended
to turn the mind of the hearers, by its own
unaided effect, to edifying thoughts of the eternal
and divine. Of compositions of this class we
possess several by Schumann ; nor was it in
1851 that he first began writing them. There
is an Advent hymn for solo, chorus, and orchestra
(op. 71), written in 1848; a motet for men's
voices with organ, subsequently arranged for
orchestra (op. 93), of 1849, and a New Year's
hymn for chorus and orchestra (op. 144) of the
winter of the same year ; all three settings of
poems by Friedrich Riickert. The Mass (op. 147)
and the Requiem (op. 148), on the other hand,
were composed in 1852, and Schumann may
have been thinking mainly of works of this kind
when he wrote the letter quoted above. As a
Protestant his relations to the Mass and Requiem
were perfectly unfettered ; and in the composition
of these works he can have had no thought of
their adaptation to divine service, since even in
form they exhibit peculiarities opposed to the
established order of the Mass. It may however
be assumed that it was the Catholic feeling of Dus-
seldorf which suggested them, and that he intended
the works to be performed on certain occasions
at church concerts. The words of the Mass will
always have a great power of elevating and in
spiring an earnest artist ; but irrespective of
this, the composition of a mass must have had
a peculiar attraction for Schumann on other
grounds. A poetical interest in the Catholic
Church of the middle ages was at that time
widely prevalent in Germany, particularly in
circles which were most influenced by romantic
poetry, and found in the middle ages the realisa
tion of their most cherished ideals. Schumann
shared in this tendency ; a vein of mystical re
ligionism, which otherwise might have lain dor
mant, often shows itself in his later composi
tions. For instance, under the name Requiem we
find the setting of a hymn, ascribed to Heloise,
the beloved of Abelard (op. 90, no. 7),
Requiescat a labore
Duloroso, et amore, etc.
Other instances are the poems of Mary Stuart
(op. 175), and the Requiem for Mignon. In the
Mass he has, contrary to custom, introduced an
offertorium, Tot-a pulchra es, Maria, et macula
non est in te — not because he was personally an
advocate of Mariolatry, but because the poetical
reverence for the Virgin of mediaeval times had a
peculiar charm for him.
In judging of Schumann's sacred music, it is
necessary to repeat that, though the chorus is not
strictly speaking the musical means by which he
was best able to express himself, yet both cus
tom and the character and importance of the
subject urged him to make considerable use of
SCHUMANN.
it in these works. Thus they contain a contra
diction in themselves ; they are all nobly and
gravely conceived, but as choral music are only
very rarely satisfactory. The Mass no doubt
ranks highest, and contains much that is very
beautiful; the ' Kyrie,' the 'Agnus,' the be
ginning and end of the 'Sanctus,' and part of
the ' Credo,' being among Schumann's very best
choral works. Unfortunately there is less to be
said for the Requiem ; we should have expected
the mere idea of a mass for the dead to have
inspired such a genius as Schumann's, even
without recollecting the wonderful tones which
he has found for the final requiem in Manured.
But this work was undoubtedly written under
great exhaustion ; and the first romantic chorus
alone makes a uniformly harmonious impression.
It closes the list of Schumann's works, but it is
not with this that we should wish to complete
the picture of so great and noble a master. He
once said with reference to the Requiem, ' It is
a thing that one writes for oneself.' But the
abundant treasure of individual, pure, and pro
found art which he has bequeathed to us in his
other works is a more lasting monument to his
name, stupendous and imperishable.
Among the published works that treat of
Schumann's life and labours, that by Wasielewski
deserves the first mention (' Robert Schumann,
eine Biographic von Josef W. von Wasielewski' ;
Dresden, R. Kunze, 1858; ed. 3, Bonn, E.
Strauss, i8So). Though in time it may yet
receive additions and revision, it has still the
enduring merit of giving from accurate acquaint
ance the broad outlines of Schumann's life.
Other valuable contributions to his biography
have been written by Franz Hueffer, ' Die Poesie
in der Musik' (Leipzig, Leuckart, 1874); by
Richard Pohl, ' Erinnerungen an R. Schumann,'
in the 'Deutsche Revue,' vol. iv, Berlin, 1878
(pp. 169 to 181, and 306 to 317) ; by Max Kal-
beck, 'R. Schumann in Wien,' forming the
feuilletons of the ' Wiener Allgemeine Zeitung' of
Sept. 24, 29, and Oct. 5, 1880. An accurate and
sympathetic essay on Schumann, 'Robert Schu
mann's Tage und Werke,' was contributed by A.
W. Ambros to the ' Culturhistorischen Bilder
aus dem Musikleben der Gegenwart' (Leipzig,
Matthes, 1860; pp. 51-96). Schumann's lite
rary work has been reviewed by H. Deiters
in the Allg. musik. Zeitung (Leipzig, Breitkopf
& Hartel, 1865, nos. 47-49).
Schuberth & Co. published in 1 860-61 a The
matic Catalogue of Schumann's printed works,
extending to op. 143 only. A complete index
to all the published compositions of Schumann,
with careful evidence as to the year in which
each was written, published, and first performed,
and their different editions and arrangements,
was compiled by Alfred Dorffel as a supplement
to the ' Musikalisches Wochenblatt ' (Leipzig,
Fritzsch, 1875). ^ *s impossible to indicate all
the shorter notices of Schumann in books and
periodicals. The author of this article has had
the advantage of seeing a considerable number
SCHUMANN.
SCHUMANN.
421
of his unpublished letters and of obtaining much
information at first hand from persons who were
in intimate relations with him.
Catalogue of Schumann's Published Works.
A. FOE PF. ALONE.
(1) Solos.
Variations on the name ' Abegg. '
Op. 1.
Papillons (12 pieces). Op. 2.
Studies after Paganini's Caprices.
Op. 3.
Intermezzi, In 2 books. Op. 4.
Impromptus (Variations) on a
theme by Clara Wieck. Op. 5.
'Davidsbii.ndlertS.nze' (18 charac
teristic pieces). Op. 6.
Toccata. Op. 7.
Allegro. Op. 8.
' Carnaval ' (21 pieces). Op. 9.
6 Studies after Paganini's Ca
prices. Op. 10.
Sonata in F jf minor. Op. 11.
Fantasiestucke, in 2 books. Op.12.
Etudes in the form of variations
(Etudes symphoniques). Op. 13.
Sonata in F minor. Op. 14.
' Kinderscenen ' (13 pieces). Op. 15.
' Kreisleriana ' (8 pieces). Op. 16.
Fantasia. Op. 17.
' Arabeske.' Op. 18.
'Blumenstuck.' Op. 19.
' Humoreske.' Op. 20.
1 Novelletten,' in 4 books. Op. 21.
Sonata in G minor. Op. 22.
' Nachtstiicke.' Op. 23.
'Faschingsschwank aus Wien.'
Op. 26.
'Drei Eomanzen.' Op. 28.
4 PF. pieces (Scherzo. Gigue, Ro-
manze, and Fughette). Op. 32.
Album for the young (40 PF.
pieces). Op. 68.
4 Fugues. Op. 72.
4 Marches. Op. 76.
' Waldscenen ' (9 pieces). Op. 82.
'Bunte Blatter '(14 pieces). Op. 99.
3 Fantasiestucke. Op. 111.
3 PF. Sonatas for the younif. Op.
118.
•Albumbltttter' (20 pieces). Op.
124.
7 pieces in fughetta form. Op. 126.
'Gesange der Fruhe' (Morning
Songs, 5 pieces). Op. 133.
Scherzo, originally belonging to
the F minor Sonata, Op. 14 ;
published as No. 12 of the post
humous works.
Presto passionato, originally the
last movement of the G minor
Sonata. Op. 22; published as
No. 13 of the posthumous works.
FF. accompaniment to Bach's
Suites and Sonatas for violin
alone (Leipzig, Breitkopf & Har-
tel).
(2) Duets.
' Bilder aus Osten ' (6 pieces). Op.
66. _
'12 vierhandige Clavierstiicke far
kleine und grosse Kinder;1 Op.
85.
' Ballscenen ' (9 pieces). Op. 109.
'Kinderball' (6 pieces in dance
form). Op. 130.
(3) Duet for 2 PF.s (4 hands).
Andante and variations. Op, 46.
(4) For pedal PF. or Organ.
•Studies for the pedal PF.' (6
pieces in canon form;. Op. 56.
'Sketches for the pedal PF.' (4
pieces). Op. 53.
6 Fugues on the name BACH.
Op. 60.
B. FOB PF. WITH OTHER IN
STRUMENTS.
Quintet for PF., 2 Violins, Viola
and Cello. Op. 44.
Quartet for PF., Violin, Viola, and
Cello. Op. 47.
Trio for PF., Violin, and Cello
(D minor). Op. 63.
Adagio and Allegro for PF. and
Horn (ad lib. Cello or Violin).
Op. 70.
Fantasiestucke for PF. and Clari
net (ad lib. Violin or Cello), 3
pieces. Op. 73.
Trio for PF., Violin, and Cello
(F major). Op. ?0.
Phantasiestiicke for PF., Violin,
and Cello (4 pieces). Op. 88.
3 Romances for PF. and Oboe (ad
lib. Violin or Cello). Op. 94.
5 Stiicke im Volkston for PF. and
Cello (ad lib. Violin). Op. 102.
Sonata for PF. and Violin (A
minor). -Op. 105.
Trio for PF., Violin, and Cello
(G minor). Op. 110.
' Marchenbilder' : 4 pieces for PF.
and Viola (ad lib. Violin). Op.
113.
Sonata for PF. and Violin (D
minor). Op. 121.
' Mttrchenerziihlungen*; 4 pieces
for PF., Clarinet (ad lib. Violin),
and Viola. Op. 132.
C. FOE STRINGS.
3 Quartets for 2 Violins, Viola, and
Cello. Op. 41.
D. INSTRUMENTAL CONCERTOS.
Concerto for PF. and Orchestra
(A minor). Op. F.4.
Concertstiick for 4 Horns and Or
chestra. Op. 86.
Introduction and Allegro appas
sionato.
Concertstiick for PF. and Or
chestra (G tnaior). Op. 92.
Concerto for Cello and Orchestra.
Op. 129.
Phantasie for Violin and Orches
tra. Op. 131.
Concert-allegro, with Introduc
tion ; for PF. and Orchestra (D
minor). Op. 134.
E. FOR ORCHESTRA.
(1) Symphonies.
Symphony in Bb>. Op. 38.
Overture, Scherzo, and Finale.
Op. 52.
Symphony in C major. Op. 61.
Symphony in E b. Op. 97.
Symphony in D minor. Op. 120.
(2) Overtures.
Overture to Schiller's ' Braut von
Messina.' Op. 100.
Festival 'Overture with Chorus on
the Bheinweinlied. -Op. 123.
Overture to Shakespeare's 'Julius
Csesar.' Op. 128.
Overture to Goethe's 'Hermann
und Dorothea.' Op. 136.
Overtures to the opera ' Genc-
veva,' op. 81 ; to Byron's ' Man
fred,' op. 115 ; and to the Scenes
from Goethe's 'Faust.'
F. FOE 1 VOICE, WITH PF. AC
COMPANIMENT.
Liederkreis, by Heine (9 songs).
Op. 24.
' Myrthen,' in 4 books (26 songs).
Op. 25.
Lieder und GesSnge (5). Op. 27.
3 Poems by Geibel. Op. 30.
3 Song-poems by Chamisso. Op. 31.
12 Poems by Justinus Kerner, in 2
books. Op. 35.
6 Poems by Reinick. Op. 36.
12 Poems from Riickert's ' Liebes-
friihling ' Op. 37. (Nos. 2, 4,
and 11 composed by Clara Schu
mann.)
Liederkreis ; 12 poems by Eichen-
dorff. Op. 39.
5 Songs. Op. 40.
• Frauen-Liebe vind Leben' ; cycle
of songs by Chamisso. Op. 42.
Romanzen und Balladen (3). Op.
45.
'Dichterliehe'; cycle of songs by
Heine, in 2 books (16 songs).
Op. 48.
Romamen und Balladen (3). Op.
53.
' Belsatzar ' ; ballad by Heine. Op.
57.
Romanzen und Balladen (3). Op.
64.
Lieder und GesSnge (5). Op. 77.
Album of songs for the young (29).
Op. 79.
3 Songs. Op. 83.
'Der Handschuh'; Tjallad by
Schiller. Op. 87.
6 Songs by Willfried von der Nenn.
Op. 89.
6 Poems by Lenau, and 'Re
quiem' (old Catholic poem).
Op. 90.
3 Songs from Byron's Hebrew
Melodies (with Harp or PF. acct).
Op. 95.
Lieder und Gesange (5). Op. 96.
Lieder und Gesange from Goe
the's ' Wilhelm Meister ' (9). Op.
93 a,
7 Songs by Elisabeth Kulmanu.
Op. 104.
a Songs. Op. 107.
4 Husarenlieder by Lenau. Op.
117.
3 Poems from the ' Wildlieder' of
Pfarrius. Op. 119.
' 5 heitere Gesange.' Op. 125.
Lieder und Gesange (5). Op. 127.
'Gedichte der Konigin Maria
Stuart '(5). Op. 135.
4 Songs. Op. 142.
'Der deutsche Rhein'; patriotic
song by N. Becker (with chorus).
G. FOE VARIOUS SOLO VOICES
WITH PF.
3 Poems by Geibel (the 1st for 2
Sopranos, the 2nd for3 Sopranos,
and the 3rd [Zigeunerleben—
'Gipsy Lite'] for small Chorus,
Triangle, and Tambourines ad
lib.). Op. 29.
4 Duets for Soprano and Tenor.
Op. 34.
3 two-part Songs. Op. 43.
' Spanisches Liederspiel * ; a cycle
of songs (9, besides one as an ap
pendix) for single and several
voices (S. A. T. B.). Op. 74.
4 Duets for Soprano and Tenor.
Op. 78.
' MinnespieV from Riickert's 'Lie-
besfriihling ' for single and seve
ral voices (8 numbers). Op. 101.
' M&dchenlieder.' by Elisabeth
Kulmann, for 2 Soprano voices.
Op. 103.
3 Songs for 3 female voices. Op.
114.
'Spanische Liebeslieder" ; a cycle
of 10 songs for single and several
voices, with 4-hand accompani
ment on the PF. Op. 138.
H. FOE CHORUS WITHOUT AC
COMPANIMENT.
6 four- part Songs for men's voicesl
Op. 33.
5 Songs by Burns for mixed cho
rus. Op. 55.
I Songs for mixed chorus. Op. 59.
3 Songs for male chorus. Op. 62.
Ritornelle.' by Riickert, in canort
form, for men's voices in several
parts (7 numbers). Op. 65.
Romanzen und Balladen for cho
rus (5). Op. 67.
Romances lor female voices, with
PF. acct. ad lib. (6). Op. 69.
Romanzen und Balladen for cho
rus (5). Op. 75.
Romances for female voices, with
PF. acct. ad lib. (6). Op. 91.
Motet, 'Verzweifle nicht im
Schmerzensthal,' by Riickert,
for double male chorus (Organ
acct. ad lib.). Op. 93.
Hunting songs (5), lor male chorus,'
in several parts (with an ad lib.
acct. for 4 Horns). Op. 137.
4 Songs lor double chorus. Op.
141.
Romanzen und Balladen for cho
rus (5). Op. 145.
Romanzen und Balladen for cho
rus (5). Op. 146.
I. FOR SOLO, CHORUS, AND
ORCHESTRA.
Paradise and the Peri. Op. 50.
Adventlied, by Riickert. Op. 71.
'A Parting Song' (beginning ' Es
ist bestimmt in Gottes Rath ').
Op. 84.
Requiem for Mignon, from Goe
the's 'Wilhelm Meister.' Op.
986.
Nachtlied, by Hebbel. Op. 108.
The Pilgrimage of the Rose. Op.'
112.
Der KOnigssohn; ballad by Uh-
land. Op. 116.
Des Sangers Fluch ; ballad after
Uhland. Op. 139.
Vom Pagen und der KOnigstoch-
ter ; 4 ballads by Geibel. Op. 140.
Der Gliick von Edenhall ; ballad
by TJhland. Op. 143.
New Year's Song, by Ruckert.
Op. 144.
Mass. Op. 147.
Requiem. Op. 148.
Scenes from Goethe's 'Faust*
(without opus number).
K. DEAMATIC WORKS.
Genoveva" ; opera in 4 acts. Op.
81.
Music to Byron's 'Manfred.' Op.
115.
L. MELODRAMAS.
Sch'on Hedwig ; ballad by Hebbel
for declamation with PF. Op.106.
Ballade vom Haideknabe, by
Hebbel, for the same. Op. 122.
TJo. 1.
Die Fluchtlinge (The Fugitives) ;
ballad by Shelley, for the same.
Op. 122, No. 2. [P.S.)
SCHUMANN, CLAEA JOSEPHINE, wife of
the foregoing, one of the greatest pianoforte
players that the world has ever heard, was the
daughter of FEIEDEICH WIECK, and was born at
Leipzig, Sept. 13, 1819. She began the PE. at
a very early age under her father's guidance ; and
on Oct. 20, 1828, when she had just completed
her ninth year, made her ddbut in public at a
concert of Miss Perthaler's, where she played
with Emilie Reinhold in Kalkbrenner's 4-hand
variations on the March from Mo'ise. The notices
in the Leipzig Tageblatt and A.M.Z. show that
422
SCHUMANN.
she was already an object of much interest in the
town. At this time she was accustomed to play
the concertos of Mozart and Hummel with or
chestra by heart, and thus early did she lay the
foundation of that sympathy with the orchestra
which so distinguishes her. On November 8, 1 830,
when just over eleven, she gave her first concert
at the Gewandhaus under the good old name of
' Musikalische Akademie' ; and her performance
is cited by the A.M.Z. as a proof how far appli
cation and good teaching can bring great natural
gifts at so early an age. Her solo pieces were
Rondo brillant (op. 101), Kalkbrenner; Varia
tions brillantes (op. 23), Herz; and variations
of her own on an original theme ; and she is
praised by the critic just referred to for already
possessing the brilliant style of the greatest players
of the day. Her next appearance was on May 9,
1831, in pieces by Pixis and Herz — still bravura
music. About this time she was taken to Weimar,
Cassel, and Frankfort, and in the spring of 1832
to Paris, where she gave a concert on April 1 3,
of which,, however, no details are to be found.
Mendelssohn was there at the time, but was
suffering from an attack of cholera, and thus the
meeting of these two great artists— destined to
become such great friends — was postponed. On
July 9 and July 31, 1832, she gives two other
' Musikalische Akademien' in Leipzig, at which,
besides- Pixis and Herz, we find Chopin's varia
tions on ' La ci darem' (op. 2), a piece which, only
a few months before, Robert Schumann had wel
comed with his first and one of his most spirited
reviews. At the former of these two concerts
FrauleiiL Livia Gerhardt (now Madame Frege)
sang in public for the first time.
In October 1832 Clara Wieck seems to have
made her debut at the Gewandhaus Concerts in
Moscheles's G minor Concerto — Pohlenz was then
the conductor — and from that time forward her
name is regularly found in the programmes of
those famous Subscription Concerts, as well as of
others held in the same hall. Hitherto, it will
be observed, her music has been almost ex
clusively bravura; but on Nov. 9, 1832, she
played with Mendelssohn and Rakemann in
Bach's triple Concerto in D minor, and about
the same time Moscheles mentions her perform
ance of one of Schubert's Trios, and Beethoven's
Trio in Bb. In the winter of 1836 she made her
first visit to Vienna, and remained during the
winter playing with great success, and receiving
the appointment of ' Kk. Kammer-virtuosin/
Schumann had been on a very intimate foot
ing in the Wieck's house for some years, but it
appears not to have been till the spring of 1836
that his attachment to Clara was openly avowed,
and it was not till Sept. 12, 1840 (the eve of
her birthday), after a series of delays and diffi
culties which are sufficiently touched upon in
the preceding article, that they were married.
For eighteen months after this event Madame
Schumann remained in Leipzig. We find her
name in the Gewandhaus programmes attached to
the great masterpieces, but occasionally making
a romantic excursion, as in December 1841, when
SCHUMANN.
slie twice played with Lizst in a piece of his for
two pianos. In the early part of 1842 she and
her husband made a tour to Hamburg, which
she continued alone as far as Copenhagen. Later
in that year they were in Vienna together. In
1844 Schumann's health made it necessary to
leave Leipzig, and remove to Dresden, where
they resided till 1850. During all this time
Madame Schumann's life was bound up with
her husband's, and they were separated only by
the exigencies of her profession. She devoted
herself not only to his society, but to the bring
ing out of his music, much of which — such as
the PF. Concerto, the Quintet, Quartet, and
Trios, etc. — owed its first reputation to her. In
the early part of 1846 Schumann was induced to
go to* Petersburg, and there his wife met Hen-
selt, and had much music with him. In the
winter of the same year they were again at Vienna,
and there Madame Schumann made the acquaint
ance of Jenny Lind for the first time, and the
two great artists appeared together at a concert
in December. England, though at one time in
view, was reserved to a later day. At Paris she
has never played since the early visit already
spoken of. The trials which this faithful wife
must have undergone during the latter part of
her husband's life, from his first attempt at self-
destruction to his death, July 19, 1856, need
only be alluded to here. It was but shortly
before the fatal crisis that she made her first
visit to England, playing at the Philharmonic on
April 14 and 28, at the Musical Union on four
separate occasions, and elsewhere, her last ap
pearance being on June 24. On June 1 7 she gave
an afternoon * Recital' at the Hanover-square
rooms, the programme of which is worth pre
serving. I. Beethoven, Variations in Eb on
Theme from the Eroica; 2. Sterndale Bennett,
Two Diversions (op. 17), Suite de pieces (op. 24,
no. i) ; 3. Clara Schumann, Variations on theme
from Schumann's 'Bunte Blatter'; 4. Brahms,
Sarabande and Gavotte in the style of Bach ; 5.
Scarlatti, Piece in A major ; 6. R. Schumann's
Carnaval (omitting Eusebius, Flores tan, Coquette,
Replique, Estrella, and Aveu). She returned
from London to Bonn just in time to receive
her husband's last breath (July 29, 1856).
After this event she and her family resided
for some years- in Berlin with her mother, who
had separated from Wieck and had married a
musician named Bargiel ; and in 1863 she settled
at Baden Baden, in the Lichtenthal, which then
became her usual head-quarters till 1874.
Her reception in thi& conservative country was
hardly such as to encourage her to repeat her
visit, and many years passed before she returned.
In 1865, however, the appreciation of Schumann's
music had greatly increased on this side the
Channel ; and the anxiety of amateurs to hear an
artist whose fame on the continent was so great
and so peculiar became so loudly expressed, that
Madame Schumann was induced to make a second
visit. She played at the Philharmonic May 29,
Musical Union April 18, 25, and June 6, etc. etc.
In 1867 she returned again, and after this her
SCHUMANN.
visit became an annual one up to 1882, interrupted
only in 1878, 1879, J88o, when health and other
circumstances did not permit her to travel. In
1866 she again visited Austria, and gave six
concerts at Vienna; and any coldness that the
Viennese may have previously shown towards
her husband's compositions was then amply
atoned for.
In 1878 she accepted the post of principal
teacher of the pianoforte in the Conservatoire
founded by Dr. Hoch at Frankfort, where she is
now(i882) living and working with great success.
This is not the place or the time to speak of
the charm of Madame Schumann's personality,
of the atmosphere of noble and earnest simplicity
•which surrounds her in private life no less than
in her public performance. Those who have the
privilege of her acquaintance do not need such
description, and for those who have not it is un
necessary to make the attempt. She is deeply
and widely beloved, and a few years ago, when
there appeared to be a prospect of her being
compelled by ill health to abandon her public
appearances, the esteem and affection of her
numerous friends took the practical form of a
subscription, and a considerable sum of money
was raised in Germany and England for her use.
SCHUMANN.
423
I am indebted to Mr. Franklin Taylor for the
following characterisation of Madame Schumann's
style and works.
As an artist, Madame Schumann's place is
indubitably in the first rank of living pianists ;
indeed she may perhaps be considered to stand
higher than any of her contemporaries, if not
as regards the possession of natural or acquired
gifts, yet in the use she makes of them. Her
playing is characterised by an entire absence of
personal display, a keen perception of the
composer's meaning, and an unfailing power of
setting it forth in perfectly intelligible form.
These qualities would lead one to pronounce
her one of the most intellectual of players, were
it not that that term has come to imply a certain
coldness or want of feeling, which is never per
ceived in her playing. But just such a use of
the intellectual powers as serves the purposes of
true art, ensuring perfect accuracy in all respects,
no liberties being taken with the text, even when
playing from memory, and above all securing an
interpretation of the composer's work which is
at once intelligible to the listener — this certainly
forms an essential element of her playing, and it
is worthwhile insisting on this, since the absence
of that strict accuracy and perspicuity is too
often mistaken for evidence of deep emotional
intention. With all this, however, Madame
Schumann's playing evinces great warmth of
feeling, and a true poet's appreciation of absolute
beauty, so that nothing ever sounds harsh or
ugly in her hands ; indeed it may fairly be said
that after hearing her play a fine work (she
never plays what is not good), one always be
comes aware that it contains beauties undis
covered before. This is no doubt partly due to
the peculiarly beautiful quality of the tone she
produces, which is rich and vigorous without
the slightest harshness, and is obtained, even in
the loudest passages, by pressure with the fingers,
rather than by percussion. Indeed, her playing
is particularly free from violent movement of
any kind ; in passages, the fingers keep close to
the keys and squeeze instead of striking them,
while chords are grasped from the wrist rather
than struck from the elbow. She founds her
technique upon the principle laid down by her
father, F. Wieck, who was also her instructor,
that 'the touch (i. e. the blow of the finger upon
the key) should never be audible, but only the
musical sound,' an axiom the truth of which
there is some danger of overlooking, in the en
deavour to compass the extreme difficulties of
certain kinds of modern pianoforte music.
Madame Schumann's repertoire is very large,
extending from Scarlatti and Bach to Mendels
sohn, Chopin, and Brahms, and it would be
difficult to say that she excels in her rendering
of any one composer's works rather than an
other's, unless it be in her interpretation of her
husband's music. And even here, it' she is pro
nounced by general opinion to be greatest in her
playing of Schumann, it is probably because it is
to her inimitable performances that we owe, in
this country at least, the appreciation and love
of his music now happily become universal, and
thus the player shares in the acknowledgement
she has won for the composer.
Madame Schumann's compositions, though not
very numerous, evince that earnestness of purpose
which distinguishes her work in general. Even
her earliest essays, which are short pianoforte-
pieces written for the most part in dance-form,
are redeemed from any approach to triviality by
their interesting rhythms, and in particular by
the freshness of their modulations, the latter
being indeed in some cases original even to
abruptness. Their general characteristic is that
of delicacy rather than force, their frequent
staccato passages and the many skipping grace-
notes which are constantly met with requiring
for their performance a touch of the daintiest
lightness ; although qualities of an opposite kind
are occasionally shown, as in the ' Souvenir de
Vienne/ op. 9, which is a set of variations in
bravura style on Haydn's Austrian Hymn. Among
her more serious compositions of later date are a
Trio in G minor for pianoforte, violin and violon
cello, op. 17, which is thoroughly musicianlike
and interesting, three charming Cadences to
Beethoven's Concertos, ops. 37 and 58, and a set
of three Preludes and Fugues, op. 16, which
deserve mention not only on account of their ex
cellent construction, but as forming a most valu
able study in legato part-playing. There is also
a Piano Concerto, op. 7, dedicated to Spohr, of
which the passages (though not the modulations)
remind one of Hummel ; but it is a short work
and not well balanced, the first movement being
reduced to a single solo, which ends on the
dominant, and leads at once to the Amlante.
In the later works, as might naturally be ex
pected, there are many movements which bear
424
SCHUMANN.
SCHUPPANZIGH.
Op. 1. Quatre Polonaises.
2. Caprices en forme de Valse.
3. Romance vari<5e.
4. Valses Romantiques.
6. 6. Soirees Musicales, 10 Pieces
caract<5ristiques.
7. Concert no. 1 pour le piano
forte ; in A minor.
8. Variations de Concert, in
C, on the Cavatina in ' 11
Pirata.'
9. Souvenir de Vienne In Eb,
impromptu.
10. S3herzo. D minor.
11. 3 Romances (Mechetti).
12. SSongsl'romR Schumann's
op. 37 (nos. 2, 4. 11).
13. Sechs Lieder.
traces of the influence of Schumann's music both
in harmony and rhythm, but this influence, which
first seems perceptible in the ' Soire'es Musicales,'
op. 5, 6, is afterwards less noticeable in the piano
forte works than in the songs, many of which are
of great beauty. Schumann himself has made
use of themes by Madame Schumann in several
instances, namely in his Impromptus op. 5 (on
the theme of her Variations op. 3, which are dedi
cated to him), in the Andantino of his Sonata
in F minor op. 14, and (as a 'motto') in the
' Davidsbiindlertanze,' op. 6.
The following ia a list of Madame Schumann's
o
compositions : —
Op. 14. Deuxieme Scherzo, in C
minor.
15. Quatre pieces fugitives.
16. Drei I'raludien und Fugen.
17. Trio, PF. and Strings, G
minor.
18. (?)
29. (?)
20. Variations on a theme by
Robert Schumann. 1
21. Drei Romanzen.
22. (?)
23. 6 Lieder from Rollet's ' Ju-
cunde.'
'Liebeszauber,' lied by Geibel.
Andante and Allegro, PF. solo.
Cadences to Beethoven's Con
certos in C minor and G. r.~, -,
[iT.J
SCHUNKE, Louis (or LDDWIG ?), pianoforte
player and composer, born of a musical family at
Cassel, Dec. 21, 1810. His progress was so rapid
that at 10 he could play the Concertos of Mozart
and Hummel, with ease. In 1824 he visited
Munich and Vienna, and then Paris, where he
put himself under Kalkbrenner and Reicha.
After some wandering to Stuttgart, Vienna
(1832), Prague and Dresden, he came to Leipzig,
where he made the acquaintance of Schumann,
and an intimate friendship was the result.
Schunke was carried off on Dec. 7, 1834, at the
early age of not quite 24, to the great grief of
Schumann, who indulged his affection in several
interesting papers ('Ges. Schriften,' i. 92, 325;
ii. 56, 277) full of memorials of his friend's cha
racteristics. Schunke's appearance was striking,
and he was a very remarkable player. He was
one of the four who edited the 'Neue Zeit-
schrift fur Musik ' on its first appearance. His
articles are signed with the figure 3. [G.]
SCHUPPANZIGH, IGNAZ, celebrated vio
linist, born 1776* in Vienna, where his father
was a professor at the Realschule. He adopted
music as a profession about the time of Bee
thoven's arrival in Vienna (end of 1792), and
that he early became known as a teacher we
gather from an entry in Beethoven's diary for
1794 'Schuppanzigh three times a week, Al-
brechtsberger three times a week.' Beethoven
was studying the viola, which was at that time
Schuppanzigh's instrument, but he soon after
abandoned it for the violin. Before he was 21
he had made some name as a conductor, and in
1798 and 99 directed the Augarten concerts.
The ' Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung' of May
1799, after describing the concerts, remarks that
•1 From ' Bunte Blatter,' op. 99, no. 4 ; also varied by Brahms, op. 9.
f the zeal shown by Herr Schuppanzigh in inter
preting the compositions produced, make these
concerts models worth following by all amateur
associations of the kind, and by many conductors.'
In Oct. 1800, however, the same writer doubts
'whether Schuppanzigh is really a great con
ductor,' and as a matter of fact the concerts
declined. On the other hand, Seyfried speaks of
him as a ' thoroughly energetic, and highly gifted
orchestral player.' Beethoven, who had also
appeared at the Augarten concerts, kept up a
singular kind of friendship with Schuppanzigh.
They were so useful to each other that, as Thayer
says, they had a great mutual liking, if it did not
actually amount to affection. They used neither
' D u ' nor ' Sie ' in addressing each other, but ' Er ' —
a characteristic trait of both men. Sc-huppanzigh
was good-looking, though later in life he grew very
fat, and had to put up with many a joke on the
subject from Beethoven. 'Mylord Falstaff ' was
one of his nicknames (letter to Archduke in
Nohl, Neue Briefe, p. 75). The following piece
of rough drollery, scrawled by Beethoven on a
blank page at the end of his Sonata op. 28, is
here printed for the first time: —
Lob auf den Dicken.
fi-9-
IZf-
pzi:
£
^*
Schup - pan-zigh ist ein Lump, Lump, Lump, Wer
kennt ihn, wer kennt ihn nicht? Den dick-en Sau- ma-gen, den
33
auf-ge-blas-nen E - sels-kopf, 0 Lump Schup-pan-zigh, 0
Chor
1
/i i j' r c • j*
* i m— i i
f/\\ L. U ^ U 1* 1* C
* '* • " "• -• • «-^
v-i' b
iJ 1 C * K I*
E --sel Schuppanzigh, Wir stim-men alle ein, Dubistder
•£ --^- -*••••_•_-
»A« fl p
* * * »J
"• *- C-
- • • r~ i-- !.• ^
^' C3 II
i j ^ ^i
id ' '
Chor J
• P (* • f
i i
i — S — 5 — =' — ^ —
grosste E - - - sel ! 0
i*~\ Si, O Lumpl
•*---*-•- § -fi- §
wtf ^ ^
E - sel 1 Hi
i i
Hr S •_— -J
— ^ — =' — — '9~~\f~^E^\
•1
Efe — fcfe —
- hi - ha!
Schuppanzigh was a great quartet-player, and
belonged to the party which met every Friday
SCHUPPANZIGH.
SCHWARZSPANIERHAUS.
425
during 1794 and 95 at Prince Carl Lichnowsky's,
where he took the first violin, the Prince himself,
or a Silesian named Sina, the second, Weiss the
viola, and Kraft, an artist from the crown of his
head to the sole of his foot, the cello- — occasionally
changing with Beethoven's friend, Zmeskall. To
wards the close of 1808 Schuppanzigh founded
the Rasouinoffsky quartet, to which he, Mayseder
and Linke, remained attached for life. Weiss
again took the viola. Beethoven's quartets were
the staple of their performances. In the mean
time Schuppanzigh had married a Fraulein Ki-
litzky, the sister of a well-known singer, who
sang, with little success it is true, ' Ah perfido ! '
at a concert of Beethoven's in 1808, instead of
Anna Milder. On this occasion the great joker
writes to Graf Brunswick, 'Schuppanzigh is mar
ried — they say his wife is as fat as himself —
what a family??' (Nohl, Neue Briefe, p. u.)
When the Rasoumoffsky palace was burnt down
in 1815 Schuppanzigh started on a tour through
Germany, Poland, and Russia, and did not
return till early in 1824, when the quartets
were resumed with the same band of friends (see
Beethoven's letters to his nephew, 1825). One
of the first events after his return was the per
formance of Schubert's Octet, which is marked
as finished on March I, and was doubtless played
very shortly after. [See vol. iii. p. 3.39 6.] The
acquaintance thus begun was cemented by Schu
bert's dedication of his lovely Quartet in A ' to
his friend I. Schuppanzigh,' a year later. Schup
panzigh was a member of the court-chapel, and
for some time director of the court-opera. He
died of paralysis, March 2, 1830. Of his com
positions the following were printed : — ' Solo pour
le violon avec quatuor' (Diabelli), 'Variationen
iiber ein russisches Lied ' (Cappi) , and ' Variationen
iiber ein Theina aus Alcina' (Mollo), [F.G.]
SCHtiTT, EDUARD, born Oct. 22, 1856, at
St. Petersburg, was intended for a mercantile
career, but relinquished it for music, which he
learned from Petersen and Stein sufficiently to
pass the examination at the St. Petersburg Con
servatoire, with honour, in 1876. He then
entered the Conservatoire at Leipzig, passed the
final examination there in 1878, and went to
Vienna, where he was recently elected conductor
of the Akademische Wagner- Verein, and where
he resides in close intimacy with Leschetitsky.
In January 1882 he played his Concerto (op. 7)
in G- minor, before the Russian Musical Society
at St. Petersburg. It was performed at the
Crystal Palace, Sydenham, April 15, 1882, by
Mad. Frickenhaus. His published works contain.
— Serenade for strings, op. 6; Variations for 2
Pianos, op. 9 ; Songs ; etc. [G.]
SCHWARZSPANIERHAUS, THE. or House
of the Black Spaniard*, into which Beethoven
removed at the beginning of October 1825, and
where he died March 26, 1827. The political
and ecclesiastical relations between the two
bigoted catholic countries Austria and Spain,
in the i6th and i7th centuries, were very
close and intimate. The Infanta, Marianne,
daughter of Philip III of Spain, on her departure
(1629) for Vienna, to become the wife of Fer
dinand, took with her Prior Benedict von Pen-
nalosa Mondragon, to establish a branch house
of the once famous Benedictines of Montserrat
in her new abode. Notwithstanding the very
serious and earnest objections of the military
authorities, she prevailed upon the Emperor to
build a monastery on the outer border of the
northern glacis, and the corner-stone was laid
with .great ceremony November 15, 1633. Fifty
years afterwards (1683), on the approach of the
Turks, thebuildings wereburnt, asa step necessary
to the defence of the city. After the repulse of the
Turks and the restoration of peace, Anton Vogel,
a Viennese novice of the order, travelled through
Italy, Spain and Portugal, and collected funds
sufficient to rebuild the monastery of which he
was, not unnaturally, then made Prior. This is
the present Schwarzspanierhaus. On the accession
of Joseph II. to the throne of his mother, Maria
Theresa, the few remaining monks were sent
into the Schottenhof or ' Scotch' Cloister, and the
building was sold. The name originated thus : —
A few minutes' walk west of the edifice was
another monastery, also originally Spanish, of
'Trinitarians.' Their costume was white; that
of their neighbours black. Hence the two be
came distinguished in local parlance as the
' White Spaniards ' and ' Black Spaniards '
(Weisse Spanier, and Schwarze Spanier), and
that too, long after the last monk of Spanish
blood had passed away.
South : looking toward* Vienna.
1
1 •
1
c
T 1
b
J
3ri 1
L- ,-T. J
Court.
a. Stair arid Entrance. d. Stove.
6. Ante-rooms. e. Bed.
c. Beethoven's bedroom /. Kitchen.
(23 ft. 6 in. x 21 ft. 6 in.).
The Schwarzspanierhaus is that long range of
building, with an old church at its western end,
which stands in the rear of the new Votive Church
at Vienna. Counting from the old church, the
fifth to the ninth windows in the upper story
were those of Beethoven's lodging, of which the
above is a plan. The sixth and seventh windows
were in the large front room, (c), and, in the corner
opposite the sixth stood the bed on which he
died. By raising himself in bed, he could see
across the glacis the house — now long since
demolished — in which Lichnowsky and Peter
Erdb'dy lived ; and a few doors to the west,
that of Pasqualatti, where he himself had so
long had a lodging.
From the window, again, looking to the right,
diagonally across the square, could be seen the
'Rothe Haus,' the residence of Breuning.
426 SCHWARZSPANIERHAUS.
The street which runs directly back from the
centre of the Schwarzspanierhaus now benrs the
composer's name. [A.W.T.]
SCIOLTO, CON SCIOLTEZZA, 'freely'; an
expression used in nearly the same sense as ad
libitum, but generally applied to longer passages,
or even to whole movements. It is also applied to
a fugue in a free- style. Thus what Beethoven, in
the last movement of the Sonata in Bb, op. 106,
calls ' Fuga, con alcune licenze,' might otherwise
be called ' Fuga sciolta.' [J.A.F.M ]
SCORDATURA (mis-tuning). A term used to
designate some abnormal timings of the violin
which are occasionally employed to produce par
ticular effects. The scordatura originated in the
lute and viol, which were tuned in various ways
to suit the key of the music. Their six strings
being commonly tuned by fourths, with one third
in the middle, the third was shifted as occasion
required, and an additional third or a fifth was
introduced elsewhere, so as to yield on the open
strings as many harmonies as possible : in old
lute music the proper tuning is indicated at the
beginning of the piece. This practice survives
in the guitar. The normal tuning being as at
(a), very striking effects in the key of E major,
for instance, may be produced by tuning the
instrument as at (6). The scordatura was formerly
(«), (*>), (•'), (<*). (••) (/), (/;)
often employed on the violin, (i) The tuning (c)
is extremely favourable to simplicity of fingering
in the key of A. It is employed by Tartini in
one of his solos, and by Castrucci in a well-known
fugue : its effect is noisy and monotonous. It is
frequently employed by Scotch reel-players, and
in their hands has a singularly rousing effect.
The following strain from * Kilrack's Reel ' is a
specimen :
The reel called 'Appin House' and the lively
Strathspey called 'Anthony Murray's Reel' are
played in the same tuning. (2) The tuning
(d) employed by Biber, is a modification of (a),
a fourth being substituted for a fifth on the first
string: and (3) the tuning (e) also employed by
Biber, is a similar modification of the normal
tuning by fifths. In these tunings the viol fin
gering must be used on the first strings. (4)
The tuning (/) employed by Nardini in his
Enigmatic Sonata, is the reverse of the last,
being a combination of the common tuning for
the first two strings with the viol tuning in the
lower ones. (5) The tuning (g) is employed by
Barbella in his ' Serenade ' and by Campagnoli
in his 'Notturno/ to imitate the Viola d'amore,
SCORE.
from the four middle strings of which it is copied.
Thick first and second strings should be used,
and the mute put on. The effect is singularly
pleasing : but the G and A on th& second string
are flat and dull. (6) The tuning (A) employed
by Lolli, is the normal tuning except the fourth
string, which is tuned an octave below the third.
If a very stout fourth string is used, a good basa
accompaniment is thus obtainable.
Such are a few of the abnormal timings em
ployed by the old violinists. The scordatura is
seldom used by modern players except on the
fourth string, which is often tuned a tone higher,
as at (i}. (De Beriot, Mazas, Prume, etc.)
Tliis device may always be employed where the
composition does not descend below A ; the tone
is much increased, and in some keys, especially D
and A, execution is greatly facilitated. Paganini
tuned his fourth string higher still, as at (j)
and (&), with surprising effect : the Bb tuning
CO, O. (J)] (*)
was a favourite one with De Beriot. Paganini's
tuning in fiats (I) cannot be called scordatura, as
it consists in elevating the violin generally by
half a tone, for the sake of brilliancy. The same
device was employed by Spohr in his duets for
harp and violin, the harp part being written in
flats a semitone higher. The fourth string is
rarely lowered : but Baillot sometimes timed it
a semitone lower, as' at (m), to facilitate arpeggios
in the sharp keys.
The scordatura (ri) is employed by Bach in
his fifth sonata for the violoncello. It corre
sponds to the violin tuning (d). This de
pression of the first string, if a thick string be
used, is not unfavourable to sonority. When the
scordatura is used, suitable strings should be
obtained. Thicker ones are necessary where the
pitch is depressed, and thinner ones where it is
elevated : and the player will find it best to keep
a special instrument for any tuning which he
frequently employs. [E.J.P.]
SCORE (Lat. Partitio, Partitura, Partitura
cancellata ; Ital. Partitura, Partizione, Parlitino,
Sparta, Spartita ; Fr. Partition ; Germ. Partitur).
A series of Staves, on which the Vocal or Instru
mental Parts of a piece of concerted Music are
written, one above another, in such order as may
best enable the whole to be read at a glance.
The English word, Score, is derived from the
practice of dividing the Music into bars, bylines,
drawn — or scored — through the entire series of
Staves, from top to bottom. The custom of
writing each Part on a separate Stave sufficiently
accounts for the derivation of the Latin Partitio,
which forms the root of the modern Italian, Ger
man, and French terms — all equally applicable
to a barred, or unbarred Score. But the term
Partitura cancellata, applied to a barred Score
only, owes its origin to the appearance of lattice-
SCORE.
work produced by the compartments, or Cancellif
into which the page is divided by its vertical
scorings. In printed Music, each Stave is usually
distinguished by its proper Clef and Signature,
at the beginning of every page. In MS. Scores,
these are frequently placed at the beginning
of the first page only. In both, the Staves are
united, at the beginning of every page, either by
a Brace, or by a thick line, drawn, like a bar,
across the whole, and called the Accolade. The
continuity of this line, an 1 of the bars themselves,
is of great importance, as an aid to the eye, in
tracing the contents of the page, from the lowest
Stave to the highest : but the lines are fre
quently broken in Scores otherwise beautifully
engraved.
Of the numerous forms of Score now in common
use, two only can boast of any great antiquity.
The most important varieties are, (I.) the Vocal
Score ; (II.) the Orchestral, or Full Score ;
(III.) the Supplementary Score, or Partitino;
(IV.) the Organ, Harpsichord, or Pianoforte
Score; (V.) the Compressed Score; and (VI.) the
Short Score.
I. The VOCAL SCOKE is not only the oldest
form, by far, with which we are acquainted; but
is really very much older than most historians
have supposed. It has long been believed that
Mediaeval Composers wrote — or, at least, tran
scribed — their Music in separate Part-Books, for
some centuries before they thought of writing
the Parts one above another. In a general sense,
this proposition is true enough : but, it is subject
to some very significant exceptions. If we admit,
as we must, that a complete* set of Parts, so
arranged that the whole can be read at one view,
is entitled to rank as a Score, even though it may
not be written in any living system of Notation,
then, we cannot deny to Hucbaldus the merit of
having taught the Art of writing in Score, as early
as the first half of the loth century. In a MS.
Tract, now generally attributed to Hucbaldus,
though referred by some historians of credit to
his friend and contemporary, Odo, we find the
following specimen of Discant, for four Voices,
which, rough as it is, shows that Composers
understood even at that early period the value
of a system which enabled them to present their
Harmonies to the reader, at a single coup cTceil.1
Solution.
SCORE.
Iu Modern Notation.
427
PlXSI
j^2
i
^"j ^^1
— -i f* —^ jn»-
i
^ O r-^r
- ^? r--'
i
•G>- ^4
-<S*
"^ i"^ <*- ,
n rf* -~^ • ^-""^
-H
Jr* ^— •'
*— -^ f-^>
||
•^
if
Tu pa - tris sempiturnus es fl - Ii - us.
es
'\
tris sempiternus / \
T
pa/ ti\
S
/ es
l'\
T
Tu tris seinpiternus/ \
us
T
pa/ fi\
T
/
li\
S
Tu es
us
T
tvis sempiternus/ \
T
Pa/ fi\
!S
/ es
li\
T
Tu tris sempiternus/ \
us
T pa / ri \
T
/
ii\
S
Tu
us
1 For an explanation of Hucbald's system of Notation, see vol. ii,
p. 469.
The Harmony of this Versicle is as primitive
as the system of hieroglyphics in which it is
written. Very different is that of our next ex
ample — the earliest known specimen of a regular
Composition, presented, in Score, in the ordinary
Longs, Breves, and Semibreve?, still used in the
Notation of Plain Chaunt.2 We had occasion,
in a former article, to describe the famous
'Reading MS>,' in the British Museum,8 con
taining the now well-known Rota, ' Sumer is
icumen in.' This volume also contains a Motet,
'Ave gloriosa Mater,' scored for three Voices
in black square and lozenge-shaped notes, on a
single Stave consisting of from 13 to 15 lines,
and supplemented by a Quadruplum, or fourth
Part, written, on a separate Stave, at the end — •
probably by some later Contrapuntist, in search
of an opportunity for the exhibition of his skill.
The Quadruplum, however, has no concern with
our present purpose, which is to show, that, as
early as the year 1226, or quite certainly not
more than ten years subsequent to that date, a
Vocal Composition was scored, in this country >
by an English Ecclesiastic — in all probability
John of Fornsete * — in notes exactly like those
now in daily use in hundreds of English Churches,
and therefore perfectly intelligible to a modern
Musician. See Fac-simile I, next page.
The Library of the British Museum contains
also another record, of very little later date, and
replete with interest to English Musicians, as
showing that the Art of Scoring was not only
known in this country before the middle of the
1 3th century, but was more generally recognised
than we should have been justified in inferring
from, the evidence afforded by a single example
only. A volume, formerly in the Library of the
Royal Society, but now forming No. 248 of the
Arundel MSS., and believed to be at least as
old as the middle of the 1 3th century, contains,
on folia iS3a, 154^, I55«, 201 a, Compositions
regularly scored for two Voices, on Staves of
eight and nine lines. In the last of these — now,
unfortunately, nearly illegible — two Staves, each
consisting of four black lines, are separated by a
red line. In the other cases, the Stave consists
of eight uniform and equidistant black lines.
The upper part of the second woodcut is a fac
simile of the Hymn, ' Quen of euene for ye blisse,'
transcribed on fol. 15501. See next page.
On the same page of the MS. — fol.
2 The Grosfa of French Musicians, and the 'Gregorian Note' of
our own.
3 Harl. MSS.. no. 978. see pp. 268-270.
4 It will be understood that we speak of John of Fornsete as the
transcriber rather than the Composer of the Music, concerning the
authorship of which we have no certain evidence. Another three-
voice setting of the same words, contained in the Montpellier MS., is
attributed by Coussemaker to Franco of Cologne: but this differs
so much iroro our English version, that it Is impossible to refer the
two transcriptions to a common original.
428
SCORE.
and immediately below the 'Quen of euene,' is
another Hymn— 'Salue uirgo uirginu' — scored
for three Voices, on a Stave consisting of twelve
equidistant black lines; and immediately below
this ig a French version of the words — 'Reine
SCORE.
pleine de ducur' — adapted to the same Three-
part Composition, but with the addition of two
more lines of Poetry in each of the three verses.
The lower part of the second woodcut represents
the Latin version of the Hymn.
FAC-SIMILE 1.
faltuto^f fludbccwfa iv#o flof i
FAC-SIMILE II and III.
T^^r^^^T^FT y o ^-K-^dySfe^i
"
. AUC per qth tvq t utatmur -aCtttocr -"-<3LUJgS6cici •peaif qg Dflrttts
The evidence afforded by this venerable docu
ment — which, in allusion to the copy it contains
of the ' Angelus ad virginem'1 mentioned in
' The Milleres Tale,' we shall henceforth designate
as the Chaucer MS. — is invaluable. It does not
indeed prove, as the Reading MS. must be as
sumed to do until some earlier authority shall be
discovered, that the Art of Scoring was first
practised in England; but it does prove that
the Monastery at Reading was not the only
Religious House in this country in which the
use of the Vocal Score was known as early as
the middle of the i.^th century. Each record is
interesting enough in itself; but the united
authority of the two MSS. entitles us to assert
that Vocal Scores were well known in England,
before we meet with the earliest trace of them
elsewhere.
The Royal Library at Paris contains a Score,
transcribed by Hieronymus de Moravia about
the middle of the J3th century, on a system
closely resembling that adopted by the tran
scribers of the Reading and Chaucer MSS.— that
is to say, in black square notes, written on a
Stave of sufficient extent to embrace the united
compass of all the Voices employed — which may
be accepted as very nearly coa?val with the
'Salve virgo' we have just quoted.2
Examples like these are, however, of very rare
occurrence. Dr. Proske collected documents enough
i See an Interesting article on this subject, by Mr. William Chap-
pell, in the ' Musical Times' lor February, 1882.
to lead to the belief that the Composers of the
1 6th century noted down their Music in Score,
2 Ambros speaks of this as one of the oldest Scores in existence.
But it is not so old as the ' Ave gloriosa Mater ' in the Beading MS.
SCORE.
in the first instance : but it was always tran
scribed, for use, in separate Part-Books ; and it
was not until the I7th century was well advanced,
that Vocal Scores became common, either in MS.,
or in print. When they did so, they were ar
ranged very nearly as they are now, though
with a different disposition of the Clefs, which
were so combined as to indicate, within certain
limits, the Mode in which the Composition was
written ; the presence or absence of a Bb, at the
Signature, serving to distinguish the Chiavi
natwali, or Modes at their natural pitch, from
the Chiavette (or Chiavi trasportate), transposed
a Fifth higher, or a Fourth lower.1
Cantus
NATURAL MODES.
Cant us
A Itus
Altus
Tenor
Bassus
AH us
{—or— 4
Tenr.r I
•-or— I
Tenor II
f— or— w
Bassus
i-or-Ht-
TRANSPOSED MODES.
Cantus Altus
Cantu*
In the 1 8th century, the number of Clefs was
more restricted ; but, the C Clef was always re
tained for the Soprano, Alto, and Tenor Voices,
except in the case of Songs intended for popular
use.
At the present day, the Soprano Clef is seldom
used, except in Full Scores of Vocal Music with
Orchestral Accompaniments ; though most Italian
Singers are acquainted with it. In Scores for
Voices alone, the Soprano, Alto, and Tenor
Parts, are usually written in the G Clef, on the
Second Line, with the understanding that the
Tenor Part is to be sung an Octave lower than
it is written. Sometimes, but less frequently,
the same condition is attached to the Alto Part.
Sometimes the Alto and Tenor Parts are written
in their proper Clefs, and the Soprano in the
G Clef ; or the Soprano and Alto may both be
written in the G Clef, and the Tenor in its
i See vol. il. p. 474.
SCORE.
429
proper Clef. All these methods are in constant
use, both in England and on the Continent.
Soprano Soprano Soprano
Soprano
Alto
Tenor
Bass
Alto
/
w=
Tenor
Bass
p=
Alto
Tenor, an $ve
lower
Bass
Alto, an 8ve.
lower
Tenor y an 8ve
lower
Bass
The doubled G- Clef, in the third and fourth
of the above examples, is used by the Bach
Choir, to indicate that the part is to be sung in
the Octave below.
II. The earliest examples of the ORCHESTRAL
SCORE known to be still in existence are those of
Baltazar de Beaujoyeaulx's 'Ballet comique de
la Royne'2 (Paris, 1582) ; Peri's ' Euridice* (Flor
ence, 1600; Venice, i6o8);3 EmiliodelCavaliere's
1 Rappresentazione dell' Anima e del Corpo'4
(Rome, 1 600); and MonteverdeVOrfeo'5 (Venice,
1 609, 1613). A considerable portion of the Ballet
is written, for Viols and other Instruments, in
five Parts, and in the Treble, Soprano, Mezzo-
Soprano, Alto, Tenor, and Bass Clefs. In Cava-
liere's Oratorio, and Peri's Opera, the Voices are
accompanied, for the most part, by a simple
Thorough-bass, rarely relieved even by an In
strumental Ritornello. Monteverde's ' Orfeo' is
more comprehensive ; and presents us, in the
Overture, with the first known example of an
obbligato Trumpet Part.
Clarino
2E
Z3_5.53LE_u_E_8 " L« + \ L. ,» '
22
li\
32 '. » * + **<*+• * L, Y"
V
J
etc.
Quintus
• •
i
/A H [«• . x^3
\ J 1^ 1^ ~"^
[
(H
etc.
Alto e basso
' S Si rX S ^ S ^i 1^
fS N K S
/ * ^ rm M Si i^ fS i*l — 1% S T rS
R R S1 R'
^ J • J dh • 1 •! • •* i * 1
• • • • i
u
VVVV 1 VVVV
, . N etc.
V ulgano (stc)
1
(*
\j
(TS £3 I £2
u
etc.
• Basso
p"
L
7 4
f.1-^ - - ._
As the taste for Instrumental Music became
more widely diffused, the utility of the Orchestral
Score grew daily more apparent ; and, by degree?,
Composers learned to arrange its Staves upon a
regular principle. The disposition of the Stringed
Band, at the beginning of the 1 8th century, was
2 See vol. ii. p. 56T6.
< Ib. pp. 534-536.
3 Ib. p. 499 a and 6.
6 Ib. pp. 600-501.
430
SCORE.
exactly the same as that now in use. The two
upper Staves were occupied by the Violin Parts ;
the third Stave by the Viola ; and the lowest, by
the Bass, figured for the Organ, or Harpsichord.
With regard to the other Staves, less uniformity
was observed. Seb. Bach wrote Heal Parts for
so many Solo Instruments (now often obsolete"),
that the reduction of his Scores to a fixed type
was impossible. Handel, on the contrary, re
stricted himself, as a general rule, to the Instru
ments which formed the nucleus of the combina
tion afterwards known as the Classical Orchestra.
It was not often that he employed all these
together, even in his grandest Choruses; but,
with the exception of the Clarinets, unknown in
his day, he used them all, at different times. In
the disposition of his Scores, he adopted two
distinct methods : either placing the Brass In
struments at the top of the page ; below these,
the Oboes and Bassoons : then the Violins and
SCORE.
Violas ; and below these, again, the Vocal Parts
and the Instrumental Bass, figured for the Organ :
or he headed the page with the Violins and Violas,
and placed the Brass Instruments, the Wood
Wind, the Vocal Parts, and the Bass, in order
below them. Most of his Oratorios were arranged
upon the former plan ; and most of his Italian
Operas, upon the latter. But, there are excep
tions. In some parts of * Israel in ^Egypt,' the
highest place is assigned to the Violins ; and, in
some parts of ' Ariadne ' and ' Arminius,' to the
Wind Instruments. In a few cases, separate
Staves are allotted to the Stringed Bass, and the
Organ. Sometimes, the direction, ' Tutti Bassi,'
indicates that the same Stave serves for the
Stringed Bass and the Bassoons. The Violon
cello and Double Bass rarely occupy separate
Staves, unless the former plays an obUigato Part.
The following schemes will serve as examples of
the general arrangement.
J. S. BACH.
Mass in B Minor,
Passion ace. to S. Matthew,
Mass in D,
Mass in F,
Cliristmas Oratorio,
'Gloria.'
Introduction.
''Quoniam.'
Kyrie.
Pastorale.
Tromba Ima
CORO Imo CORO 2ndo
•Corno dl caccia
Flauti 1, 2
Flauti 1, 2
Troml>a2nda
Fl.l, 2 Fl.1,3
Fagotto Imo.
Oboi d'amorel, 2
Oboi d'amore 1, 2
Tromba Sza
Ob. 1,2 Ob. 1,2
Fagotto 2ndo.
Fagotto
Oboi da caccia 1, 2
Tym
Viol.l Viol. 1
BASSO SOLO
Violino Imo
Violino Imo
Flauti 1, 2
Viol. 2 Viul .•>.
Continue
Violino 2ndo
Violino 2ndo
Oboll,2
Viola Viola
Viola
Viola
Fagotti!, 2
S. A S. •,
SOPRANO I. N
^Oi'g. e continue
Violinolmo.
A.) A.)
SOPEANO II. /
Violino 2iido.
T. f T. f
ALTO S
Viola
B. ) B. )
TENORE (
SOPRANO I. "\
Org. e Basso Org. e Basso
BASSO )
SOPRANO II. /
Continue
ALTO >
TENORE \
BASSO /
Continue
G. F. HANDEL.
• Hallelujah,'
Messiah.
'How excellent,'
Saul.
'Wise men
flattering,'
Judas Much.
. Occasional
Overture.
Overture,
Otho.
'Lascia amor '
Orlando.
Second
Hautboy
Concerto.
First
Organ
Concerto.
Tromba 1
Trombone 1
Corno Imo
Tromba Ima
Violino Imo
Violino Imo
Violino Imo
Oboe Imo
Tromba 2
Trombone 2
Corno 2ndo
Tromba 2nda
Violino 2ndo
Violiuo 2ndo
(concertino)
Oboe2ndo
Tympani
Trombone 3
Flauto Imo
Principale
Violino 3zo
Viola
Violino 2ndo
Violino Imo
Violinol
Tromba 1
Flauto 2ndo
Tympaui
Viola
Oboe Imo
(concertino)
Violino 2ndo
Violino 2
Tromba 2
Oboe Imo
Oboel
Oboe Imo
Oboe2ndo
Violino Imo
Viola
Viola
Tympaul
Oboe 2ndo
Oboe 2
Oboe2ndo
Fagotti
(ripieno)
ORGAN on 2
CANTO \
Oboe 1
Fagotti
Violino Imo
Fagotti
BASSO SOLO
Violino 2ndo
Staves
ALTO I
Oboe 2
Violino Imo
Violino 2ndo
Bassi
Tutti
(ripieno)
Basso
TENORE f
Fagotti
Violino 2ndo
Viola
Oboe Imo
BASSO )
Violinol
Viola
Tutti Bassi
Oboe 2ndo
Bassi
Violino 2
SOPRANO SOLO
Viola
Viola
Bassi
Fagotto Imo
CANTO \
Fagotto 2udo
ALTO I
TENORE f
Bassi
BASSO J
Bassi
When Orchestral Scores became more compli
cated, the process of reading them was greatly
facilitated by careful methods of grouping. In
Italy the Violins were usually placed at the top
of the page ; then the Wood Wind, arranged ac
cording to the pitch of its component Instruments ;
then the Brass Instruments; and in the lowest
place, the Bass. In Germany the complete
Stringed Band was generally placed at the bottom
of the page ; next above this the Wood Wind ;
and over this the Brass Instruments, with the
Tympani in the highest place : or the Brass In
struments immediately over the Stringed Band,
and the Wood Wind at the top of the page.
Sometimes the Horns were placed between the
Clarinets and Bassoons ; and many other little
peculiarities were affected by individual Com'
posers : but the general plan was pretty closely
observed. Mozart generally followed the Italian
method, in his Italian Operas, but adhered to the
German plan in 'Die Zauberflote,'and the greater
number of his Symphonies. Beethoven preferred
SCORE.
the German system ; and almost always allotted
separate Staves to the Violoncello and Contra-
Basso — a plan which has been imitated by most
SCORE.
431
later Masters. The following schemes exhibit
the practice of the great Classical Composers
generally.
HAYDN.
MOZART.
Creation,
Introd.
Seasons,
Overture.
Sinf.,
Reine de
France.
Overture,
Zauberflote.
Overtures,
Don Giovanni
& La Clemenza.
Jupiter Symph.
First Mass.
Bequiem Mass.
Requiem
ceternam.
Trombe 1, 2
Viol. 1
Corni 1, 2
Fl.1,2
Viol. 1
Tymp.
Viol. 1
Viol.l
Tymp.
Viol. 2
Oboi 1, 2
Ob. 1.2
Viol. 2
Trombe 1, 2
Viol. 2
Viol. 2
Trombone 1
Vio'a
Flauto
Clar.1,2
Viola
Corni 1, 2
Oboi 1, 2
Viola
Trombone 2
Fl.1,2
Fag. 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Fl.l
Ob. 1,2
Clariun.2
Corni dl
Trombone 3
Ob. 1, 2
Viol. 1
Corni. 1,2
Fl. 2
Flauto
Tymp.
bassetto 1, 2
Clar.1,2
Clar.1,2
Viol. 2
Trombe 1,2
Ob. 1, 2
Viol.l
S. \
Fag. 1. 2
Corn i 1,2
Fag. 1, 2
Viola
Tymp.
Clar. 1, 2
Viol. 2
A-l
Trombe 1, 2
Oboi 1,2
Trombe 1,2
Basso
Trombone 1
Fag. I, 2
Viola
T. f
Tymp.
Flautil,2
Tymp.
Trombone 2
Corni 1, 2
Fag. 1,2
B.J
S. )
Fag. 1,2
Trombone 1
Trombone 3
Clarinil, 2
Basso
Org. e Basso
A.I
Contra Fag,
Trombone 2
Viol. 1
Tymp.
T. f
Vuo.l
Violoncello
Viol. 2
Bassi
1
Vno.2
Basso
Viola
Org. e Basso
Vio'a
Basso
Basso
BEETHOVEN.
SCHUBERT.
WEBER.
Sinf. in
Sinf. No. IX.
Overture,
Overture,
PF. Concerto
Mass in D,
Overtures,
C Minor.
1st Movem.
Leonora.
Egmont.
in Eb.
' tiloiia.'
Sinf. in C.
Der Freisch'itz
Concert Stuck
No. V.
* Euryanthe.
Tymp.
Fl.1,2
Fl.1,2
Fl.l
Fl.1,2
Fl.1,2
Viol.l
Fl.1,2
Fl. 1,2
Clarinil, 2
Ob. 1, 2
Ob. 1.2
F1.2
Ob. 1,2
Ob. 1, 2
Viol. 2
Ob. 1,2
Ob. 1, 2
Corm'1,2
Clar.1,2
Clar. 1, 2
Fl. Pico.
Clar. 1 2
Clar. 1, 2
Viola
Clar.1,2
Clar.1,2
Fl.1,2
Fag. 1, 2
Fag. 1,2
Ob. 1,2
Fag. 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Fl. 1, 2
Corni 1, 2
Corni 1,2
Fl. Pice.
Corni 1, 2
Corni 1, 2
Clar.1,2
Corni 1,2
Contra Fag.
Ob. 1,2
Corni 3, 4
Fag. 1, 2
Oboi 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Corni 3, 4
Fag. 1
Trombe 1, 2
Corn! 1,2
Clar. in 01, 2
Fag. 1,2
Trombe 1, 2
Clar. 1, 2
Trombsl,2
Trombe 1, 2
Fag. 2
Tymp.
Corni 3, 4
Bassoons 1, 2
Trombe 1,2
Tymp.
Fag. 1, 2
Tymp.
Tymp.
Corni 1, 2
PF. SOLO
Trombe 1,2
Horns in C 1,2
Tymp.
PF. SOLO
Trombone 1
Viol. 1
Trombone 1
Corni 3, 4
Viol. 1
Tymp.
Trumpets in
Trombone 1
Viol. 1
Trombone 2
Viol. 2
Trombone 2
Clarini
Viol. 2
Trombone 1
01,2
Trombone 2
Viol. 2
Trombone 3
Viola
Viol.l
Tymp.
Viola
Trombone 2
Trombones,
Trombone 3
Viola
Viol. 1
Violoncello
Viol. 2
Viol. 1
Violoncello
Trombone 3
Alto&Tenoi
Viol.l
Violoncello
Viol. 2
Basso
Viola
Viol. 2
Contr. Basso
Viol. 1
Trombone,
Viol. 2
Contr. Basso
Viola
Violoncello
Viola
Viul.2
Bass
Viola
Violoncello
Contr. Basso
Violoncello
Viola
Tympani
Violoncello
Contr. Basso e
Contr. Basso
S. >
Violoncello
Contr. Basso
Contr. Fag.
A L
Basso
T \Soli
B'.J
S. )
A (
T /Tutti
B'.'
Org.
Violoncello
Basso
CIMAROSA.
KOSSINI.
DONIZETTI.
CHEEUBINI.
Overture,
U Malrimonio
Sejjreto.
Overture
Guillaume Tell.
Mo'ise,
Introduction.
Siabal Mater.
Overture,
La Favorita.
Overture,
Lea deux
Journces.
Overture,
Anaci-eon.
Eequiem in
C Minor.
Dies irae.
Corni 1,2
Fl.
Pice.
Fl.1,2
Viol.l
Fl. 1, 2
Fl.1,2
Ob. 1,2
Trombe 1, 2
Pice.
Fl.
Ob. 1,2
Viol. 2
Ob. 1, 2
Ob. 1,2
Clar. 1, 2
Clar. 1, 2
Ob. 1, 2
Ob. 1,2
Clar.1,2
Viola
Clar.1,2
Clar.1,2
Fag. 1.2
Viol. 1
Clar.1,2
Clar. 1, 2
Corni 1, 2
Pice.
Corni 1, 2
Corni 1,2
Corni 1, 2
Viol. 2
Corni 1, 2
Corni 1,2
Trombe 1, 2
Fl.
Corno 3
Corni 3, 4
Trombe 1,2
Viola
Corni 3, 4
Corni 3, 4
Fag. 1. 2
Ob. 1,2
Fag. 1, 2
Trombe 1, 2
Trombone 1
Fag. 1. 2
Trombe 1, 2
Trombe 1,2
Trombone 1
Clar. 1, 2
Trombe 1, 2
Trombone 1
Trombone 2
Basso
Fag. 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Trombone 2
Corni 1, 2
Tymp.
Trombone 2
Trombone 3
Trombone 1
Trombone 1
Trombone 3
Corni 3, 4
Viol. 1
Trombone 3
Trombone 4
Trombone 2
Trombone 2
Tymp.
Trombe con le
Viol. 2
Tymp.
Tymp.
Trombone 3
Trombone 3
Viol. 1
Chiavi 1, 2.
Viola
Viol.l
Viol.l
Tymp,
Ophicl.
Viol. 2
Fag. 1,2
Violoncello
Viol. 2
Viol. 2
Piatti
Tymp.
Viola
Trombone 1
Basso.
Viola
Viola 1
Triang.
Gran Cassa
S. \
Trombone 2
Fag. 1, 2
Viola 2
Gran Cassa
Piatti
V O01I
Trombone 3
Violoncello
S
Viol.l
Viol. 2
Triang.
Viol.l
T. ( b
B.'
Ophicl.
Tymp.
Basso
A.I
T-(
Viola
Viol. 2
S. )
Gran Cassa
I
Violonc. 1 Solo
Viola
A. ( c
Triang.
Gran Tamburo
2 —
S. i
>p . VUIO
Trombe 1.2
Violoncello
3 —
A.
B. '
Violoncello
Basso
- 4 —
T-r
Violoncello
Basso
5 —
B. J
Basso
- Rip.
Violoncello
Basso
Easso
432
SCORE.
SPONTINI.
SPOHR.
MENDELSSOHN.
Overture
La Vestale.
Overtures
Faust and
Jessonda.
Overture
Fall of
Babylon.
Die Weihe
der Tone
1st Mov.
Die Weihe
der Tone.
March-
Overture
Mids. Night's
Dream.
Overture
Fingal's
Hohle.
Overture
S. Paul.
Violin
Concerto.
Viol. 1
Fl. 1, 2
Fl. Pice. Eb
Fl. terzo
Fl. Pice.
Fl.l, 2
Fl.l
Fl.1,2
Fl. 1, 2
Viol. 2
Ob. 1, 2
Fl.l
Fl.
Fl. 1. 2
Ob. 1, 2
Fl. 2
Ob. 1, 2
Ob. 1, 2
Fl. 1, 2
Clar. 1, 2
Fl. 2
Ob. 1, 2
Clar. 1, 2
Clar. 1. 2
Ob. 1
Clar. 1, 2
Clar. 1,2
Ob. 1,2
Fag. 1, 2
Ob 2
(liar. 1
Corni 1. 2
Fag. 1, 2
Ob. 2
Fag. 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Clar. 1. 2
Corni 1, 2
Clar. 1
Clar. 2
Corni 3, 4
Corni 1, 2
Clar. 1
Serpente
Corni 1, 2
Corni 1, 2
Corni 3. 4
Trombe 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Trombe 1, 2
Trombone 1
Clar. 2
Corni 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Fag 1
Corni 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Fag. 1
Trombe 1, 2
Piatti
Triansr.
Gran Tamb.
Trombe 1, 2
Ophicl.
Tymp.
Clar. 2
Fag.l
Fag. 2
Corni 1, 2
Trombe 1,2
Trombone 1
Trombe 1, 2
Tymp.
VIOL. SOLO
Fag. 1, 2
Trombone 2
Fag. 2
Fag. 2
Tamb. Milit.
Viol. 1
Corni 1, 2
Trombone 2
Viol, i
Trombone 1
Trombone 2
Trombone 3
Tymp.
Trombone 3
Tymp.
Viol. 1
Viol. 2
Clarinil.2
Tamb. Milit.
Trombone 1
Trombone 2
Trombone 3
Viol. 1
Viol. 2
Viola
Violoncello
Trombone 1,2
Trombone 3
Fag. 1, 2
Viol. 1
Viol. 2
Viol. 2
Viola
Violoncello
Basso
Trombe 1, 2
Tymp.
Viol. 1
Viol. 2
Trombone 3
Tymp.
Viol. 1
Viol. 2
Viol. 2
Viola
Basso
Viola
Viola
Viol. 1
Basso
Viola
Viola
Viola
Violoncello
Basso,
Viol. 2
Violoncello
Violoncello
Organo
Basso
Viola
Violoncello
Basso
Basso
Basso
Violoncello
Basso
SCHUMANN.
JOACHIM.
BfiUCH.
BHAHMS.
METEKBEEE.
Sinf. InEb
Overture
March in Le Prophtte.
Nottiirno,
Romanza,
Triumphlied.
Robert le
Robert toi
Genoveva.
Op. 12.
Op. 42.
Diable.
quej'aime.
Orchestra. On the Stage.
Tymp.
Fl. 1, 2
Fl. 1, 2
Fl. 1, 2
Viol. 1
Viol. 1
Fl. Pice. Sax Cor. Sop. 1, 2
Trombs 1,2
Corni conlo
Ob. 1, 2
Cl. 1, 2
Ob. 1. 2
Clar. 1, 2
Ob. 1, 2
Clar. 1. 2
Fag 1 2
Viol. 2
Viola
Viol. 2
Viola
Fl. 1 2 Sax Cor. Contralt. I, 2
Clar ] 2 Sax Cor' Contralt- 3. *
Chiavi 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Contr. Fag.
Fl. Pic.
Fl. 1, 2
Clar'. Basso Cornetti 1, 2
Corni 1, 2
Corni 1, 2.
Corni 1.2
Corni 1, 2
Fl. 1,2
Ob.
Fag. 1, 2 Trombe con le Chiavi 1, 2
Fl. 1, 2
Ob. 1,2
Clar. 1. 2
VIOL. SOLO
Viola
Violoncello
Corni 3, 4
Trombe 1, 2
Tymp.
Cornl 3, 4
Trombe 1, 2,3
Trombone 1
Trombone 2
Ob. 1, 2
Clar. 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Corno Inglese
Clar. 1, 2
Fag. 1. 2
Corni 1, 2 Sax Cor. Alt. 1, 2
Corni 3 4 Sax Cor. Alt. 3, 4
Trombone 1 ca, nn. DO- i o
Trombone 2 Sax Cor' Bar' l- 2
Fag 1, 2
Basso
VJOL. 1 SOLO
Trombone 3
Corui 1, 2
Corni 1, 2
Trombone 3 *ax Cor- Bass. ], 2
Trombone 1
VIOL. 2 SOLO
Tuba
Corni 3, 4
Corni 3, 4
Ophicleide Sax Cor. Bass. 3, 4
Trombone 2
Trombone 3
Viol. 1
Viol. 1
Viol. 2
Viola
Tymp.
Viol.l
Viol. 2
Viola
Trombe con,
le Chiavi 1,2
Trombone 1
Trombe 1, 2
Trombone 1
Trombone 2
Trombe 1, 2 gax. Cor. Contr. Bass 1 2
Trombe 3, 4 Tomb \filit l 2
Tymp. 1, 2, 3 Tamb' 31lllt> J> 2
Gran. Cassa
Viol. 2
Violoncello
B. SOLO
Trombone 2
Trombone 3
Piatti
Viola
Basso
A)
Trombone 3
Ophicleide
Tamb. Milit.
Violoncello
T>CoroI
Ophicleide
Tymp.
Viol. 1
Vio! 2
Basso
B )
Tymp.
Arpe 1, 2
Vio! a
S
Gran. Cassa
S. SOLO
Vio'oncello
y >Coro II
Piatti
T. SOLO
Basso
Violoncello
Violoncello
Violoncello
Basso
Basso
Basso
The later Scores of Berlioz, Liszt, and Wagner,
introduce a greater variety of Wind Instruments,
and vary, very much, in their method of arrange
ment. The following schemes will show the sys
tem adopted in some of their best-known Com
positions.
BERLIOZ.
BENOIT.
LISZT.
Harold Sinf.
Lee Franca
Juges.
Symphonic
Funtbre.
Te Deum.
Marche
des Drapeaux.
Cliarlotte
Corday.
Faust Symph.
1st Mov.
Faust Symph.
And. mistico.
Missa Coron.
Kyrie.
Fl. 1,2
Fl. Pice.
Fl. Pice. Db
Fl.l. 2, 3, 4
Fl.l, 2, 3, 4
Fl.1,2
Fl.Picc.
Fl.1,2
Fl.1,2
Ob. 1. 2
Fl. 1, 2
Fl. Pice. Eb
Ob. 1, 2. 3, 4
Ob. 1,2, 3,4
Fl. Pice.
Fl. 1, 2
Ob. 1, 2
Ob. 1, 2
Clar. 1,2
Ob. 1,2
Clar. 1, 2 Eb
Clar. 1, 2,3,4
Corni 1 2
Clar. 1,2, 3, 4
Ob. 1,2
Ob. 1,2
Clar. 1, 2
Clar. 1,2
Corni 1, 2
Clar. 1, 2
Clar. 3,4 Bb
Corni 3. 4
Fag. 1, '2, 3, 4
Corno Inglese
Clar. 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Fag. 1,2
Corni 3, 4
Corni 1, 2
Ob. 1, 2
Trombe 1,2
Corni 1, 2
Clar. 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2
Corni 1,2
Corni 1,2
Trombe 1, 2
Corni 3 4
Corni 1,2
Cornetti 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Clar. Basso
Corni 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Corni 3, 4
Cornetti 1, 2
Trombe 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Corni 5 6
Fag. 1, 2
Sax Cor. in B'?
Corni 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Viol.l
Trombe 1, 2
Fag. 1, 2, 3, 4
Trombe con
Trombe 1, 2
Fag. 3. 4
Tromboni 1, 2
Trombe 1, 2
Corno 3
Trombe 1. 2
Viol. 2
Tromboni 1, 2
Trombone 1
le Chiavi 1, 2
Trombe 3, 4
Tromboni 3, 4
Cornetti 1, 2
Trombe 1, 2
Trombone 1
Viola
TromboneS
Trombone 2
Triang.
Trombone 1
Trombone 2
Cornetti 1, 2
Trombone 1
Trombone 2
Tromboni 5, 6
Ophicleide
Tiiho
Trombone 1
Trombone 2
Tromba 3
Fag. 1, 2
Trombone 2
Trombone 3
T. Solo
Tuba
Viol. 1
Tymp.
Trombone 3
Trombone 3
i i i > i
Tvmo
Trombones
Fag. 3
Tuba
B. /
Viol. 2
Arpa
Ophicl. 1, 2
Trombone 4
J- „' »"!-'•
Viol. 1
Ophicleide
Trombonl,2,3
Tymp.
Organo
Viola
VIOLA SOLA
Fag. 1, 2
Ophicl. 1, 2
Viol. 2
Tuba
Trombone 4
Piatti
Violoncello
S. i
Viol. 1
Contr. Fag.
clar. Basso
Fag. 1. 2
Viola
O
Arpe
Tuba
Viol. 1
Basso
£' Soli
Viol. 2
Viola
Tymp.
Gran. Cassa
Contr. Fag.
Violoncello
T. I Coro I
B./
Tymp.
Tambur,
Tymp.
Tamb. Milit.
Viol. 2
Viola
T.
B.;
Vio oncello
Viol. 1
Contr. Basso
S. ,
Viol.l
Gran Cassa
Violoncello
s. i
Basso
Viol. 2
Tymp.
Tamb. Milit.
T , Coro II
Bj
Viol. 2
Viol. 1
Basso
A- ,' Coro
Viola
Piatti
. -*
S. A. Coro III
Viola
Viol. 2
~* 1
Violoncello
Gran Cassa
Violoncello
Violoncello
Viola
B.'
Basso
Piatti con
Basso
Basso
Violoncello
Organo
sordini
Tam-Tam
Organo
Organo
Basso
Violoncello
Basso
SCORE.
433
WAGNEB.
Overture
Tannh&user.
Prelude
Lohengrin.
Overture
Rheingold.
Die Walkure.
Act I1L Scene I.
Die WilTtiire
Act III, Finale.
Gotterd mmerung
Prelude.
Gdlterdarnmerung
March.
Fl. 1, 2
Fl. 1, 2, 3
Fl. 1, 2, 3
Fl. Pice. 1, 2
Fl. Pice. 1.2
Fl. 1, 2
Clar. 1
Ob. 1,2
Ob. 1, 2
Ob. 1. 2
Fl. 1, 2
Fl.1,2
F1.3
Clar. 2
Clar. 1, 2
Corno Inglese
Corno Inglese
Ob. 1, 2, 3
Ob. 1, 2, 3
Ob. 1, 2
Clar. 3
Corui con le
Clar. 1, 2
Clar. 1, 2
Corno Inglese
Corno Inglese Ob. 3
Clar. B.osso
Chiavi 1, 2
Clar. Basso
Clar. Basso
Clar. 1, 2. 3
Clar. 1, 2
Corno Inglese
Corni 1. 2
Corni 1.2
Fag. 1, 2, 3
Fag. 1,2.3
Clar. Basso
Clar. 3
Clar. 1
Corni 3, 4
Fag. 1, 2
Corni 1, 2
Trombe 1, 2, 3
Corni 1, 2
Corni 1, 2
Clar. 2. 3
Fag. 1
Trombe 1, 2
Corni 3, 4
Tromba Bassa
Corui 3, 4
Corni 3. 4
Clar. Basso
Fag. 2
Trombone 1
Trombe 1, 2, 3
Corni 1, 2
Corni 5, 6
Fag. 1. 2, 3
Corni 1, 2
Fag. 3
Trombone 2
Trombone 1
Corni 3, 4
Corui 7, 8
Clar. Basso
Corni 3, 4
Tub. Ten. 1, 2
Trombone 3
Trombone 2
Corni 5, 6
Fag. 1, 2. 3
Arpe 1, 2, 3
Fag. 1, 2 i
Tub. Bass. 1, 2
Tuba Bassa
Trombone 3
Corni 7, 8
Trombe 1, 2
Arpe 4, 5, 6
Fag. 3
Tub. Contrabass
Tymp.
Tuba Bassa
Trombone 1
Trombe 3, 4
Carvillon
Tub. Ten. 1, 2
Ti omba Bassa
Viol. 1
Tymp.
Trombone 2
Tromba Bassa
Triang.
Tub. Bass. 1, 2
Tromboni 1, 2
Viol. 2
Piatti
Trombone 3
Trombone 1
Piatti
Tub. Contrabass
Tromboni 3. 4
Viola
Viol. 1 Solo
Contrabass Tromoa
Trombone 2
Viol. 1 divisi
Tromba 1
Tymp.
Violoncello
Viol. 2 „
Contrabass Tuba
Trombone 3
Viol. 2 ,.
Trombe 2. 3
Viol. 1
Basso
Viol. 3 „
Viol. 1
Trombone 4
Viola
Tromba Bassa
Viol. 2
Viol. 4 „
Viol. 2
Tuba Contr. Bass.
Violoncello
Trombone 1
Viola
Viol. 1 divisi
Viola
Tymp. 1, 2, 3, 4
Basso
Tromboni 2, 3
Violoncello
Viol. 2 .,
Violoncello
Piatti
Tromba. Coutr. Bass.
Basso
Viola
Basso
Biihrtrommel
Viol. 1
Violoncello
Viol. 1
Viol. 2
Basso
Viol. 2
Viola
Viola
Violoncello
S. Coro
Basso
Arpe
Violoncello
Basso
In all these Scores, the Parts for the so-called
'Trausposing-Instruments' correspond with the
separate ' Parts' used in the Orchestra. That is
to say, the Parts for the Horns, and Trumpets,
are always written in the Key of C, whatever
may be the Key of the piece in which they are
played. The Parts for the Bb Clarinets are always
written a Major Second higher than they are in
tended to sound ; and those for the A Clarinets,
a Minor Third higher: so that, should the piece
be in the Key of Eb, the Parts for the Bb Clari
nets will be written in F; should it be in Cfl
Minor, the Parts for the A Clarinets will be
written in E minor. The parts for the Corno
Inglese and Corno di Bassetto, are written a
Perfect Fifth higher than they are intended to
sound. Those for Sax Horn, Tuba, Baryton,
Euphonium, and other Brass Instruments of the
transposing order, follow the same rule, and give
rise to complications extremely puzzling to the
uninitiated. These Instruments, however, ap
pear by right in Military Music only.
Though the constitution of the Military Band
bears but little resemblance to that of the or
dinary Classical Orchestra, its Scores are really
arranged upon a very similar principle. The
office ordinarily performed by the Stringed In
struments is, as a general rule, confided, in
Military Music, to a body of Clarinets and Bas
soons, strong enough to sustain, if not the whole
weight of the Harmony, at least the greater part
of it, except in such cases as that of a powerful
tutti, needing the support of the heavier Brass
Instruments. The importance of this section of
the Band demands for it a prominent place in
the Score, where it can at once catch the reader's
eye. In Brass Bands, this position is usually given
to the Cornets, which, as a general rule, supply
the place of the Violins. But the Military Band
VOL. in. PT. 3.
also finds employment for countless novelties,
both in Wood and Brass, the number of which
is perpetually increasing. The arrangement of
Military Scores is therefore subject to modifica
tions of detail which preclude the possibility of a
persistent formula, though the following schemes
give a fair idea of their general features.
Small Military
Band.
Large Military
Band.
Military Brass
Band.
Flautl
Flautl
Cornetti soprani
Clarinetti In Eb
Oboi
Cornetti
Clarinet ti in Bb
Clarinetti in Eb
Trombe
Fagotti
Claiinettiin Bb
Corni Tenori
Cornetti
Clarinetti Tenori
Tromboni Tenori
Trombe
Clarinetti Bassi
Tromboni Bassi
Corni
Fagotti
Baritoni
Tromboni Tenori
Cornetti
Euphonion
Tromboni Bassi
Trombe
Bombardon! in Eb
Baritoni
Corni 1, 2
Bombardon! in Bb
Euphonion
Corni 3, 4
Tamburo piccolo
Bombardon!
Tromboni Tenori
Gran Cassa
Tamburo Piccolo
Tromboni Bassi
Piatti
Gran Cassa
Corni Tenori
Piatti
Baritoni
Euphouioa
Bombardon! in Eb
Bombardon! in Bb
Tamburo piccolo
Gran Cassa
Piatti
Tympanl
III. The PARTITINO, or SUPPLEMENTARY SCORE,
is a species of appendix, used only when the num
ber of Parts employed is so great that it is im
possible to transcribe them all upon a single page.
The oldest known examples of the Vocal Partitino
are those furnished by the Pes of the Eound
'Sumer is icumen in,' shown in facsimile on
page 269, and the Quadruplum at the end of the
' Ave gloriosa Mater ' described on page 427 6. In
Orchestral Music, the Parts for the Instruments
of percussion, or even for the Trombones, are
frequently added, in a small Score, at the end.
For instance, in Breitkopf & Hartel's fine oblong
Ff
434
SCORE.
Score of ' II Don Giovanni,' the Trombone Parts
of the last Finale are printed at the end of the
volume, with the necessary direction, Tromboni
se trovano al Fine.
IV. The ORGAN, HARPSICHORD, or PIANOFORTE
SCORE, is a Vocal Score, with an Accompaniment
for the Organ, Harpsichord, or Pianoforte, added,
on one or two Staves beneath it. Among the
earliest and most interesting examples of this
kind of Score ever printed in England, are Har
rison's editions of Handel's ' Messiah,' ' Dettingen
Te Deum,' ' Ode for S. Csecilia's Day,' ' Acis and
Galatea/ and other like works, with Harpsichord
Accompaniment. In these, and in the original
editions of Boyce's Cathedral Music, Croft's An
thems, and other similar publications, the Organ
or Harpsichord Part is given in the form of a
Figured Bass only, and printed on a single Stave.
In modern Organ and Pianoforte Scores, the
Accompaniment is always printed on two Staves.
In all cases, the Vocal Paris are arranged in one
of the forms given on page 429.
V. The COMPRESSED SCORE is an arrangement
of Vocal Part-Music, on two Staves, one of which
presents the Soprano and Alto Parts, written in
the Treble clef, while the other exhibits the
Tenor and Bass, in the Bass Clef. Instrumental
Music may be, and sometimes is, compressed in
the same way; especially in the case of Stringed
Quartets : but it is indispensable that every
note of the original Composition shall appear in
its proper place, whether it can be played upon
a Keyed Instrument or not ; otherwise, the
transcription degenerates into a mere 'arrange
ment.' A familiar example of the Compressed
Score will be found in ' Hymns Ancient and
Modern.'
VI. The term SHORT SCORE is indiscriminately
applied to Organ and Pianoforte Scores of works
originally written with Orchestral Accompani
ments ; to Compressed Scores ; and to maimed
transcriptions, in which the leading Parts only
are given in extenso. Among these latter may
be classed the early editions of Handel's Songs,
and an enormous number of ' Vauxhall Songs,' by
Hook, Storace, Dibdin, arid other popular Com
posers of the latter half of the i8th century. In
these now scarce old copies, printed on coarse
blue paper, and engraved in the roughest possible
style, the Violin Parts of the Symphonies are
filled in, wherever there is room for them, on the
Stave belonging to the Voice, the lower Stave
being occupied by a Figured Bass. As the
number of popular Songs so printed, a hundred
years ago, was countless, we must suppose that
the average standard of popular musical education,
in the last century, was very much higher than
it is now ; for it is certain that not one amateur
out of five hundred would be able to play from
such copies, at the present day. [W.S.R.]
SCORE, ARRANGING FROM. An Or-
chestral Composition is said to be ' arranged
from the Score,' when its principal features are
adapted, by a judicious process of condensation,
to the capabilities of the Organ, Pianoforte, or
any other Keyed or Solo Instrument.
SCORE, ARRANGING FROM.
The successful performance of this operation
demands a thorough knowledge of the laws of
Harmony and Composition ; and the principles
and practice of Instrumentation ; r a perfect com
mand of the particular Instrument for which the
arrangement is intended; sound judgment, and
long experience. Were it possible to transfer
Orchestral passages to the keyboard notatim,
the task of arranging would be a very simple
one ; but it would be a great mistake to suppose
that the most literal transcription from the Score
is invariably the best, or the most effective one.
Many complicated passages need extensive sim
plification, in order to bring them within the
compass even of four hands upon the Pianoforte ;
while the execution of many Violin passages is
absolutely impossible upon Keyed Instruments.
Liszt himself could not play the following pas
sage from the Overture to 'Der Freischiitz,' at
anything like the required pace : —
This passage has been 'arranged' in several
different ways, two of which we subjoin. The
first, at (a), was sanctioned by Weber himself,
in an arrangement published in 'The Harmo-
nicon,' No. xxi. Sept. 1824. The second, at (6),
is the inspiration of a later arranger, who, in the
hope of attaining brilliancy, has distorted the
rhythm of the passage, beyond all possibility of
recognition, at the expense of an entire bar.
Great ingenuity on the part of the arranger is
frequently demanded, in the case of passages in
which several solo instruments are employed
simultaneously ; particularly should any of the
parts be obbligato. Long-sustained notes also
frequently need very careful management ; and
there is often great difficulty in the simplifica
tion of very elaborate accompaniments, which, if
arranged as they stand in the score would pre
sent unconquerable difficulties to the performer,
while, if injudiciously adapted to the keyboard
they either weaken the harmony irreparably or
produce an effect quite different from that in
tended by the composer. Again, it is sometimes
all but impossible to give a literal rendering
of passages the complications of which are in
creased by the crossing of the Parts ; as in the
following phrase from the Overture to ' Die Z;iu-
berflote ' : —
i See OBCHESTRATION, vol. ii. pp. 507-373.
SCORE, ARRANGING FROM.
SCORE, PLAYING FROM. 435
etc.
In modern arrangements, this passage is fre
quently rendered as at (a) ; but, this literal
transcription is not often very effectively played.
In Mozart's own time, it was arranged as at (5),
where many important features of the Score are
omitted, for the sake of producing a light and
graceful Pianoforte passage.
f>
t
2«— »-
«—»—
But nowhere is the arranger's responsibility
so grave, as in passages in which it is neces
sary to alter the exact notes of the Score, in
order to produce the exact effect intended by
the Composer. A remarkable instance of this
is mentioned by H. Dora, who tells us that
Mendelssohn, in accompanying the Duet ' 0
naraenlose Freude,' in Fidelio, once endeavoured
to reproduce a peculiarly grand Orchestral effect,
by playing the Violoncello and Double Bass Parts
two Octaves apart. [See vol. ii. p. 257 «.] A
glance at the passage will show the immense
dignity with which the entrance of the Double
Bass is invested by this thoughtful arrangement.
Viol.
sfc — =1 —
— =1 — P
— q =| -J — f-I
w — •
-^-i
; •> • m
Cello j
A^
~£$ ><=
L
p^ —
-^ T" (& "v^'* i
J •
•
•
Jf I B^^" ,**H U
etc.
Contrabasso
r
It is in such passages as these that the true
strength of an ' Arrangement ' is shown ; and it
is here that judgment and experience prove
themselves to be not only desirable, but indis
pensable conditions of success. [See ARRANGE
MENT.] [W.S.R.]
SCORE, PLAYING FROM. The Art of
playing from Score forms one of the most neces
sary branches of a thorough musical education :
and it is desirable that the Student should en
deavour to master its difficulties at a very early
period. Clever Choristers frequently read from
Score with great fluency ; more especially those
educated in Cathedrals in which the original
editions of Boyce, Arnold, Croft, Greene, and
other Masters of the English School are preferred
to modern reprints. For no great advantage
can exist without some compensatory drawback ;
and it is notorious that the modern practice of
printing the Accompaniment exactly as it is in
tended to be played, while it gives to hundreds
of amateurs their only chance of playing it,
sadly diminishes the number of those who, going
to the heart of the matter, unite themselves with
the Composer's intention by tracing the involu
tions of the Voice Parts.
The first . qualification needed by the Student
who desires to play from Score at sight is, an
intimate familiarity with the C, G, and F Clefs,
in all their forms.1 The second is the power of
reading from four, or any greater number of
Staves, simultaneously. And to these must be
added, the knowledge necessary for filling in the
Harmony indicated by the Figures placed under
a Thorough-Bass. He who has satisfactorily
mastered these three preliminary difficulties will
«oon be able to read a Vocal Score ; and, if he will
only be careful to reproduce the interweavings of
the Vocal Parts, with the nearest approach to
literal accuracy which the nature of Keyed Instru
ments permits, availing himself of the assistance
afforded by the Figured Bass, only when the actual
Part- writing becomes too complicated to admit
the possibility of its transference notatim to the
Key-board, he will be able to accompany with a
self-reliance which can never be acquired by
See the formulae on page 429 a.
Ff2
436 SCORE, PLAYING FROM.
those who trust to the facilities offered by an
' arrangement,' however good that ' arrangement'
may be.
In order to play effectively from an Orchestral
Score, two additional qualifications are necessary :
an intimate acquaintance with the principles of
Instrumentation; and a sound judgment, to be
acquired only by long experience, and careful
listening to the effect produced by certain In
strumental combinations. The Student _will
naturally begin by playing Compositions written
for Stringed Instruments alone, or Voices ac
companied by Stringed Instruments ; such as
Handel's Overtures, and a multitude of his Songs
and Choruses. The chief difficulty to be en
countered here, is that of adapting Violin pas
sages to the Key -board, in cases in which their
exact transference is impossible ; as in such in
stances as
SCORE, PLAYING FROM.
which must necessarily be played in the follow
ing, or some analogous form.
-^->
1
But little additional difficulty is presented
by Scores enriched with Parts for Oboes and
Bassoons, beyond the judgment necessary for
indicating the desirable contrast between the
Stringed and Wind Instruments. But, with the
' Transposing Instruments,' the case is very dif
ferent. The first power to be attained is that of
reducing Horn and Trumpet passages, from the
Key of C, into that in which the Composition
stands. Good examples for practice will be
found in Haydn's Symphonies, which are con
stantly written for Oboes, Bassoons, and Horns,
in combination with each other. More puzzling
still, to the uninitiated, are Clarinet Parts ;
which, as already explained,1 are written either
a Major Second or a Minor Third higher than
the Violins, and, when used with Horns or
Trumpets, constantly involve the necessity for
reading in three different Keys at once, as in
the following passage from ' ^ +™^;' i™ ' TI r>™
Giovanni.'
Mi tradi'in 'II Don
Violins
Clarinet in Bb
n _"f '• .
T
Bassoon ,p ;*•••-•
Horns in
Voice
r
-F — •-
- - ta.
mi tra - di quell' al-ma in-
Cello r^Tl ^^
I t- •
Basses^ Basses
which is really intended to sound thus—
1 See p. 433 a.
Much discussion has lately taken place, in
English Musical Periodicals, concerning the desir
ableness of simplifying the appearance of Orches
tral Scores by writing the Parts for Transposing
Instruments in the Keys in which they are in
tended to sound. At first sight the suggestion
seems reasonable enough ; but there are grave,
if not insuperable objections to it. In the first
place, it presupposes an amount of knowledge,
on the part of the copyist, which few copyists
possess. In accordance with our present practice,
the separate Parts are transcribed exactly as
they stand in the Score ; whereas, were the new
suggestion adopted, they would all be at the
mercy of the copyist's aptitude for transposing
correctly. Again, the root of the new idea is,
the desire for providing a royal road, where
no royal road can, by any possibility, exist, or
would be of any use if it could. Surely, the
Student who can read, simultaneously, five or six
Staves, written in as many different Clefs, need
not be afraid of the very slight additional diffi
culty of transposing a Clarinet Part. The Ac-
companyist who cannot transpose fluently at
sight is incapable of efficiently performing the
role he has undertaken : and the suggestion
we deprecate is calculated rather to encourage
his slothfulness, than to afford him any real
help. If Art is to progress, in earnest, it
will gain nothing by smoothing the road to
superficial knowledge, and thereby setting a
premium upon half-heartedness, to the manifest
SCORE, PLAYING FROM.
disadvantage of those who think no amount of
study too great for the attainment of a thorough
acquaintance with the arcana taught by the
Great Masters.
We therefore counsel the Student to make a
bold attack upon the difficulties we have pointed
out ; and, after having acquired the power of
reading Clarinet Parts, to go on bravely to
those written for the Corno di Bassetto ; playing
from the Scores of Mozart, Schubert, Beethoven,
Weber, Mendelssohn, and Spohr, in the order in
which we have here mentioned them ; and, if
need be, proceeding from these to the works of
more modern writers, and even to Compositions
scored for a Military Band. His progress,
after the first steps are surmounted, will depend
mainly upon the amount of experience he is able
to gain, from careful listening to the performance
of the Orchestral Works of Great Masters. The
reproduction of an effect once heard is an easy
matter, compared to the operation of imagining
one suggested only by the appearance of the
Score : and it is by carefully noting such effects,
and remembering the combinations which pro
duce them, that the Student strengthens his
judgment, and eventually becomes an accom
plished Player from Score. [W.S.R.]
SCORING. The term Scoring is applied to
the process of displaying the various Parts of an
Orchestral Composition upon a single page, in
order that the whole may be read at a glance.
[See SCORE.]
To the copyist, this process is a purely me
chanical operation. He scores an Overture, or a
Symphony, by transcribing its separate Parts,
one above the other, in the order indicated in
one of the schemes shown at pp. 430-433 ; and,
in so doing, has to contend with no difficulty
whatever, beyond that of counting his bars
correctly.
To the Composer, the Scoring of an orchestral
work is a much more serious matter. He does
not, as a general rule, begin the process, until he
has, in great measure, determined upon the
effects he intends to produce, and the office he
intends to assign to his principal Instruments.1
Having settled these points satisfactorily, he
usually writes out the more important Parts at
once, without waiting to fill in those that are of
less consequence ; and, when the plan of the whole
is thus sketched out, he proceeds to supply the
minor details, at his leisure, frequently with con
siderable modifications of his original intention.
The autograph Scores of the great Masters
exhibit this process, in all its successive phases.
For instance, in the original Score of ' La So-
nambula,' the Recitative which precedes ' Tutto
e sciolto ' is introduced by a long passage for
two Valve Trumpets, which Bellini afterwards
entirely crossed out.
But, it is from unfinished Scores that we de
rive the most valuable instruction on this im
portant point. In the unfinished Score of
Mozart's 'Requiem,' known as the Urschrift,
i See ORCHESTRATION, vol. ii. pp. 567-573.
SCOTCH SYMPHONY.
437
and now preserved in the Imperial Library at
Vienna, we find the Composer beginning to Score
his several Movements by writing out the Vocal
Parts in full, with the Basso continuo, for the
Organ and Basses ; the "Parts for the other Instru
ments being only filled in where the Voices are
silent, or, for the purpose of indicating, at the
beginning of a Movement, some special figure in
the Accompaniment, intended to be fully written
out at a future time.
No less interesting and instructive is the un
finished Score of Schubert's Seventh Symphony,
in E, now in the possession of the Editor of this
Dictionary, and which is fully described under
the head of SKETCH.
These two invaluable MSS. would serve to give
us a very clear idea of the method of working
pursued by the Great Masters, even if they stood
alone : but, fortunately, their testimony is corro
borated by that of many similar documents, in
the handwriting of Beethoven, and other Classi
cal Composers, who, notwithstanding their indi
vidual peculiarities, all proceeded upon very
nearly the same general principles. The study
of these precious records puts us in possession of
secrets that we could learn by no other means ;
and, by carefully comparing them with complete
Scores, by the s;ime great writers, we may gain
a far deeper insight into the mysteries of Scoring
than any amount of oral instruction could possi
bly convey. [W.S.R.]
SCOTCH SNAP or CATCH is the name
given to the reverse of the ordinary dotted note
which has a short note after it — in the snap the
short note comes first and is followed by the long
one. It is a characteristic of the slow Strathspey
reel rather than of Scotish vocal music, though
as Burns and others wrote songs to some of these
dance-tunes, it is not infrequently found in con
nection with word.s. ' Green grow the rashes,'
'Roy's wife,' 'Whistle o'er the lave o't,' and
above all, Hook's excellent imitation of the Scot
ish style, ' Within a mile of Edinburgh,' contain
examples of the snap. It was in great favour
with many of the Italian composers of last cen
tury, for Dr. Burney — who seems to have in
vented the name — says in his account of the
Italian Opera in London, in 1 748, that there was
at this time too much of the * Scots catch or
cutting short of the first of two notes in a melody.'
He blames Cocchi, Perez and Jomelli ' all three
masters concerned in the opera Vologeso ' for
being lavish of the snap. An example of it will
be found in the Musette of Handel's Organ Con
certo in G minor ( 1 739) ; he also uses it occasion
ally in his vocal music.
-r
ff'trtu
l"-vJ
tpq
^
Efe
[J.M.W.]
SCOTCH SYMPHONY, THE. Mendels
sohn's own name for his A major Symphony (op.
438
SCOTCH SYMPHONY.
56), one of the works in which he recorded the
impressions of his Scotch tour in 1829. Other
results of that expedition are the ' Hebrides '
overture, the PF. Fantasia in F| minor (op. 28),
originally entitled by its author 'Senate e'cossaise,'
the PF. Fantasia in A minor, op. 16, no. i, and
the two-part song ' 0' wert thou in the cauld
cauld blast.'
The subject of the opening Andante of the
Symphony dates from his visit to Holyrood in
the evening of July 30, 1829, when it was written
down. The Symphony was planned and begun
during his residence in Italy in 1831, but was
not finally finished till Jan. 20, 1842, the date
on the finished score. It was first performed at
a Gewandhaus Concert on March 3 of the same
year, again at the Gewandhaus Concert next fol
lowing. He then brought it to England, conducted
it at the Philharmonic Concert, June 13, 1842,
and obtained permission to dedicate it to Queen
Victoria.
The passage for flutes, bassoons, and horns,
connecting the end of the first movement with
the scherzo, was, on the authority of Prof. Mac-
farren, put in after the rehearsal (under Sterndale
Bennett) at the Philharmonic, and added by
Goodwin, the copyist, to the Leipzig MS. parts.
The score and parts were published (as Symphony
no. 3) by Breitkopf & Hartel in March 1851.
The work is peculiar among Mendelssohn's
symphonies from the fact that it is not separated
by the usual pauses. This is especially enjoined
in a preface by the author prefixed to the score,
in which the titles and tempi are given, differently
from what they are at the head of the movements
themselves. [G.]
SCOTISH MUSIC. As national music,
that of Scotland has long been held in high
esteem. Early notices of it may be meagre, but
are always laudatory. Unfortunately, there are
no means of proving what it was in remote times,
for the art of conveying a knowledge of sounds
by comprehensible written signs was a late inven
tion, and music handed downi by mere tradition
is always most untrustworthy. Even after the
invention of musical writing, the learned men
who possessed the art employed it almost entirely
in the perpetuation of scholastic music, having ap
parently an equal contempt for melody in general,
and for the tunes prized by the uneducated vulgar.
There is a belief that the earliest Scotish music
was constructed on a series of sounds which has
been styled Pentatonic, not, however,, peculiar to
Scotland, for airs of a similar cast have been found
in countries so wide apart as China and the West
Coast of Africa. Many have conceived the idea
that the style was brought into this island by its
earliest known inhabitants — the little dark men
of the Iberian race. Others, with more or less
probability, ascribe its introduction to the Celts,
whose love of music is generally admitted. As
no evidence is or can be offered on either side, it
is sufficient to mention the conjectures.
It is a remarkable fact that the first to write a
history of Scotish music based on research was
an Englishman, Joseph Eitson, a celebrated anti-
SCOTISH MUSIC.
quary and critic, who wrote towards the end of
last century. He seems to have been a man of
irascible temperament, but love of truth lay at
the root of his onslaughts upon Johnson, Warton,
Percy, Pinkevton, and others. Any assertion
made without sufficient evidence, he treated as
falsehood, and attacked in the most uncompromis
ing manner. His ' Historical Essay on Scotish
Song' has so smoothed the way for all later
writers on the subject that it would be ungenerous
not to acknowledge the storehouse from which
his successors have drawn their information — in
many cases without citing their authority. The
early portion of the Essay treats of the poetry of
the songs, beginning with mere rhymes on the
subject of the death of Alexander III. (1285),
the siege of Berwick (1296), Bannockb urn (1314^,
and so on to the times of James I. (1393-1437),
whose thorough English education led to his
being both a poet and a musician. His ' truly
excellent composition At Beltayne or Peblis to
the play is still held in high esteem,' but of his
music there are no remains. This is the more
to be regretted as a well-worn quotation from
Tassoni states that ' Non pur cose sacre compose
iu canto, ma trovb da se stesso una nuova musica
lamentevole e mesta, differente da tutte 1'altre ' —
James (first) King of Scotland ' not only wrote
sacred compositions for the voice, but found out
of himself a new style of music, plaintive and
mournful, differing from every other.' This de
scription of 'plaintive and mournful' agrees very
well with one style of Scotish music ; and as
the King wrote poetry to please his unlettered
subjects he may also occasionally have composed
music of an equally popular cast. That James
improved Scotish music need not be doubted,
but it is altogether absurd to suppose that he
invented a style that must have been in existence
long before his era. The quotation, however,
serves to show that in Italy James and not Rizzio
— most gratuitously supposed to have aided the
development of Scotish music — was believed to
have originated or amended this style. As
Tassoni flourished soon after Rizzio's time, he
had an opportunity of knowing somewhat more
of the question than writers who came a century
and a half later. George Farquhar Graham has
at some length controverted the Eizzio myth.
Graham was a very competent judge of such
matters, and believed that some of our airs might
be of the I5th century; though the earliest to
which a date can now be affixed is the ' Lament
for Flodden,' 1 5 1 3, of which further mention will
be made.
As so little is known of the popular music
of the 1 5th century, a few extracts from the
accounts of the Lords High Treasurers of Scot
land may be found interesting. They show the
value placed on the services of musicians who
at various times visited the Courts of James III.
and James IV. Scotish money being usually
reckoned as worth only one twelfth of English
money, the payments seem very small ; but are
not so in reality. For on consulting a table
of prices of provisions supplied for a banquet
SCOTISH MUSIC.
SCOTISH MUSIC.
439
given by James IV. to the French ambassador,
it is f«»und that a gratuity such as that to John
Broun would buy seven oxen ; and that the ' twa
fithelaris' (fiddlers) who sang 'Graysteil' to the
King received the value of three sheep. The
sums seem odd, but an examination of the items
will show that the payments were made in gold.
The unicorn (a Scottish coin that weighed from
57 to 60 grains of gold) is valued in the accounts
at eighteen shillings ; and another coin, the equi
valent of the French crown, at fourteen shillings —
1474. Item, gevin at the kingis command iij° Septembris,
to John Broiin, lutare, at his passage our sey to leue
(? lere, i. e. learn) his craft, . . . v. li.
1439. July 1. — Item, to Wilzeam, sangster of Lithgow
for a sang bwke he brocht to the king be a precept,
x. li.
1490. April 19. — To Martin Clareschaw and ye toder ersche
clareschaw at ye kingis command, . xviij. s.
May.— Till ane ersche harper, at ye kingis command,
xviij. s.
Mr. Gunn, in his Enquiry on the Harp in the
Highlands, quotes thus from a work of 1597 — •
'The strings of their ClairscJioes (small Gaelic
harp) are made of br.asse wyar, and the strings
of the Harp of sinews, which strings they stryke
either with their nayles growing long or else
with an instrument appointed for that use.' The
correct word is Clarsach ; and the harper Clarsair.
14:11. Aug. 21. — Item to iiij Inglis pyparis viij unicorns,
vij. li. iiij. s.
1417. Apr. 10. — Item to John Hert for bering a pare of
monicordis of the kingis fra Abirdene to Strivelin
(Stirling), ix. s.
Apr. 11.— Item, to the tua fithelaris that sang Graysteil
to ze king, ix. s.
1500. Mar. 1.— Item, to Jacob, lutar, to lowse his lute
that lay in wed, xxxij. s.
(Which means that the thriftless Jacob re
ceived the value of eleven sheep to redeem his
lute that lay in pawn.)
1503. Aug. 13.— Item to viij Inglis menstrales be the
kingis command xl f<enche crownis, . xxviij. li.
Sept. 10. — Item to the four Italien menstrales tofe thaim
hors to Linlithqw and to red thaim of the town,
Ivj. s.
(Riotous fellows, no doubt, who got a French
crown each to clear their ' score ' in Edinburgh,
and hire horses to Linlithgow.)
Information regarding the state of popular
music during the i6th century is almost equally
meagre. James V. is believed to have written
two songs on the subject of certain adventures
which befell him while wandering through the
country in disguise ; these are ' The gaberlunzie
man' and 'The beggar's mealpokes' (mealbags).
The airs are said to be of the same date, but of
this there is really no certainty ; though Eitson,
with all his scepticism, admits them into his list
of early tunes ; the second is much too modern in
style to have been of James V's date. Of Mary's
time there are two curious works in which musi
cal matters are mentioned. ' The Complaynte
of Scotland' (1549), and 'The Gude and Godly
Ballates ' (ballads) (1578), both of which furnish
the names of a number of tunes almost all now
unknown. Mr. J. A. H. Murray, in his excellent re
print of the former of these, says ' The Complaynte
of Scotland consists of two principal parts, viz.
the author's Discourse concerning the affliction
and misery of his country, and his Dream of
Dame Scotia and her complaint against her three
sons. These are, with rather obvious art, con
nected together by what the author terms his
Monologue Recreative.'
This Monologue — which, from its being printed
on unpaged leaves, Mr. Murray has discovered
to be an afterthought — is now the most inter
esting part of the work. In it the author intro
duces a number of shepherds and their wives.
After 'disjune' (dejeuner} the chief shepherd
delivers a most learned address, and then they
proceed to relate stories from ancient mythology,
and also from the middle ages. Short extracts to
give an idea of the style may not be objected to.
Quhen the scbeipherd hed endit his prolixt orison to
the laif of the scheiphirdis, i meruellit nocht litil quhen
i herd ane rustic pagtour of bestialite, distitut of vrbanite,
and of speculatione of natural philosophe, indoctryne
his nychtboura as he hed studeit ptholome, auerois,
aristotel, galien, ypocrites or Cicero, quhilk var expert
practician in methamatic art. . . . Quhen thir scheip-
hyrdis hed tald al thyr pleysand storeis, than thay and
thervyuis began to sing sueit melodius sangis of natural
music of the antiquite. the foure marmadyns that sang
quhen thptis vas mareit on month pillion, thai sang
nocht sa sueit as did thir scheiphyrdis. . . .
Then follows a list of songs, including —
Pastance vitht gude companye, Stil vndir the leynis
grene, Cou thou me the raschis grene, . . . brume brume
on nil, . . . bille vil thou cum by a lute and belt the in
Sanct Francis cord, The frog cam to the myl dur, rycht
soirly musing in my mynde, god sen the due hed byddin
in France, and delaubaute hed neuyr cum name, . . .
o lusty maye vitht flora quene, . . . the battel of the
hayrlau, the hunttis of cheuet, . . . My lufe is lyand
seik, send hym ioy, send hym ioy, . . . The perssee and
the mongumrye met, That day, that day, that genti. day.
With the exception of the ballads, these seem to
be chiefly part-songs, some of them English.
Than eftir this sueit celest armonye, tha began to
dance in ane ring, euyrie aid scheiphyrd led his vyfe
be the hand, and euyrie Bong scheiphird led hyr quhome
he luffit best. Ther vas viij scheiphyrdis, and ilk ane of
them hed ane syndry instrament to play to the laif. the
fyrst hed ane drone bag pipe, the nyxt hed ane pipe
maid of ane bleddir and of ane reid, the thrid playit on
ane trump, the feyrd on ane corne pipe, the fyf t playit
on ane pipe maid of ane gait home, the sext playt on
ane recordar, the seuint plait on ane flddil, and the last
plait on ane quhissil.
The second instrument seems to have been a
bagpipe without the drone ; the third, a Jew's-
harp, and the last a shepherd's-pipe, or flute
a bee. Sir J. Graham Dalyell says 'Neither the
form nor the use of the whistle (quhissil) is ex
plicit. It is nowhere specially denned. In 1498
xiiij s. is paid for a whussel to the King. . . .
Corn-pipe, Lilt-pipe, and others are alike obscure.'
In the other little book already mentioned,
known as the 'Gude and Godly Ballates' (1578)
there are a number of songs ' converted from
profane into religious poetry.' Dr. David Laing,
who published a reprint of it in 1868, informs us
that the authorship of the work is usually as
signed to two brothers, John and Robert Wed-
derburn of Dundee, who flourished about the
year 1540. It is divided into three portions;
the first is doctrinal ; the second contains metrical
versions of Psalms, with some hymns, chiefly
from the German ; the third, which gives its
peculiar character to the collection, may be de
scribed as sacred parodies of secular songs. They
were to be sung to well-known melodies of the
time, which were indicated usually by the first
440
SCOTISH MUSIC.
line or the chorus ; but as Dr. Laing points
out that not one of the secular songs of which
these parodies were imitations has come down to
us, a few only of the tunes can be ascertained.
Three of them are certainly English, ' John
cum kiss me now,' 'Under the greenwood tree/
and ' The huntis up.' A fourth is ' Hey now the
day dawes,' which Sibbald and Stenhouse have
attempted to identify with ' Hey tuti taiti ' (Scots
wha hae). This is not only improbable, but is
disproved by a tune of the same name being
found in the Straloch MS. (1627). It has no Scot-
ish characteristics, and may have been picked up
from some of the English or foreign musicians
who were frequent visitors at the Scotish Court.
It is an excellent livel}' tune, and may have been
that played by the town pipers of Edinburgh in
the time of James IV; if so, the note marked
with an asterisk must have been altered to C to
suit the scale of the instrument. Dunbar thought
it so hackneyed that he complains
Your common menstrallis ha3 no tone
But ' Now the day dawis ' and ' Into Joun '
Think ye nocht shame.
The day dawis.
(From the Straloch MS. A.D. 1627.)
Toi D " * * J r
--
— ^>
r ^ |
vy a: • " •
.
^
>
1 1
•— • —
*
-i t-i
— 1 ^ — ^^* — 4 *
-f-
Ep
(•_. P
1 N
/
-i— «-^JT| - ->-£
> |
-£--P -
1 •
i
3"1 \ i
\ w
a
• !•
• 1«
£li
k
• • • "
J
ft
-
1
^- *
-• •
• * 4
B
r '[
hh
9
• -A-- «- -1^
IS i
J -
*
^
K
1
Of the other son^s, ' Ah my love, leif me not '
may be ' I '11 never leave thee,' and ' Ane sang on
the birth of Christ, to be sung with the tune of
Eawlulalu,' may probably be ' Baloo my boy lie
still and sleep,' for in both songs the measure
and also the subject — sacred for secular — are the
same. The words, being in Bishop Percy's
ancient MS., are thought to be English, but Dr.
Kimbault considered the time to be Scotish.
Sibbald's identifications of a few other tunes are
altogether fanciful : ' The wind blaws cauld,
furious 'and bauld,' with ' Up in the morning
early ' ; ' My luve murnis for me,' with ' He's low
down in the broom,' and so on. Altogether not
more than a third of the whole can now be even
guessed at.
The religious troubles of this and the following
reigns would no doubt completely unsettle what
ever musical tuition might be carried on by the
Romish Church, but the introduction of 'sang
schuils ' and of Genevan Psalmody would prob
ably soon compensate for any loss thence arising.
[SANG SCHOOLS.] It does not come within the
scope of this paper to consider such changes ;
but the allegation already alluded to, that Rizzio
composed some of the finest Scotish melodies, is
deserving of a more careful enquiry.
Goldsmith, at the instigation apparently of
Geminiani, chose to write an essay on a subject
SCOTISH MUSIC.
of which he evidently knew very little. He
asserts that Rizzio was brought over from Italy
by James V., lived twenty years in Scotland, and
thus had sufficient time to get a knowledge of
the style, and ample opportunities for improv
ing it. It is well known, on the contrary, that
Rizzio came over in the suite of the Piedmontese
Ambassador in 1561, 19 years after the death of
James V., and was little more than four years in
Scotland. That he ever composed anything in
any style has yet to be shown. Tassoni, who was
born the year of Rizzio's death (1565), and who
speaks of Scotish music — as has already been
noticed — entirely ignores him. In truth the myth
seems to have been got up in London early in the
last century, probably among his own country
men. It is first heard of in the 'Orpheus Cale-
donius' of 1725, where the editor ascribes seven
tunes to him. Two at least of these are shown
by their style to be very recent compositions ; but
the absurdity of the statement must have been
quite apparent, as all mention of Rizzio's name
was withdrawn in the next edition of the work,
1733-
Oswald, by jestingly ascribing some of his own
compositions to Rizzio, helped to keep up the
falsehood. Notwithstanding the disclaimers of
Ritson, Hawkins, and more recently of G. Far-
quhar Graham, as well as of all who have made
any research into the question, the belief still
exists, and is from time to time gravely pro
pounded by persons who ought to know better.
For 1 60 years after his death Rizzio is not
mentioned as having composed music of any kind.
Had he done so, it would have been in the style
of France or of Italy, and it may be doubted
whether Queen Mary herself would have appre
ciated any other. It must not be forgotten that
she quitted Scotland when little more than five
years of age, and returned Queen Dowager of
France, a widow of nineteen, with all her tastes
formed and every association and recollection
connected with a more civilised country than
her own.
Mr. Dauney, in his Dissertation prefixed to the
Skene MS. gives some interesting information
regarding the Chapel Royal in Stirling. It was
founded by James III., of whom Lindsay of Pits-
cottie says that ' he delighted more in musick and
in policies of Bigging (building) than he did in
the governance of his realm .... He delighted
more in singing and playing on instruments, than
he did in the Defence of the Borders .... He
took great pleasour to dwell thair (in Stirling)
and foundet ane collige within the said Castle
callit the Chappell Royal ; also he bigget the
great hall of Stirling ; also he maid in the said
Chappell Royal all kynd of office men, to wit, the
bishop of Galloway archdean, the treasurer and
sub-dean, the chantor and sub-chantor, with all
other officieris pertaining to a College ; and also
he doubled thaim, to that effect, that, theyschould
ever be readie ; the one half to pass with him
wherever he pleased, that they might sing and
play to him and hold him merrie ; and the other
half should remain at home to sing and pray for
SCOTISH MUSIC.
SCOTISH MUSIC.
441
him and his successioun' (ed. 1728). All this
was afterwards abolished ; but in 1612 its resto
ration was ordered by James VI,, its place of
residence to be at 'Halyrudhous' — 'the palace
of the samyn, and the Chappell not to be called
the Chappell royall of Striveling as heretofore but
his majesties Chappell Royall of Scotland, and
the members to attend his majesty in whatever
part of Scotland he may happen to be.' In 1629
Charles I. granted an annual pension of £2000 to
the musicians of the Chapel, and preparations
were made for the celebration of religious service
according to the forms of the Church of England.
The nature of these arrangements is very fully
given in an ' Information to the King by E.
Kellie' (1631): among other things he was ap
pointed ' to see that none but properly qualified
persons should have a place there, and that they
should all be kept at daily practise, and for that
effect your Majestic appointed mee ane chambre
within your pallace of Halyrudhous wherein I
have provided and sett up, ane organe, two flutes,
two pandores, with violls and other instruments,
with all sorts of English. French, Dutch, Spaynish,
Latine, Italian, and OLD SCOTCH music, vocall
and instrumental!.' The capitals are Mr. Da 'iney's,
who says, ' There can be no doubt that this last
expression referred to the popular national music
of Scotland. That sacred music was here not
meant is sufficiently obvious ; the metrical
psilmody of the Reformed Church was not old,
and the music of the Church in Scotland before
the Reformation was identical with that of Rome,
and therefore not Scottish.' Here Mr. Dauney
surely applies to the music what can only be said
of the words of the service ; the latter were the
same throughout all Roman Catholic countries,
while the music, on the contrary, varied in every
locality, being frequently the composition of the
chapel-master or of the organist of the church
where it was performed. Without insisting on
the fact already stated, that James I. of Scot
land wrote sacred music — ' cose sacre compose in
canto' — reference may be made to the Scotish
composers mentioned by Dr. David Laing as
having written music for the church before the
Reformation. Among these are Andrew Black-
hall, a canon of Holyrood ; David Peblis, one of
the canons of St. Andrews, who in 1530 set the
canticle ' Si quis diliget me ' in five parts ; and
Sir John Futhy ('the Sir denotes he was a priest'),
who wrote a moral song, ' 0 God abufe,' in four
parts, ' baith letter and not,' that is, both words
and music — as well as others whose names it is
unnecessary to mention. Besides, there need not
be a doubt that their predecessors were occasional
composers from the time when James I. in 1424
set up organs in churches. That this is the music
called Old Scotish in Kellie's ' Information' seems
to be the only reasonable explanation of these
words. For though the members of Kellie's choir
in fitting time and place might sing to the king
' to hold him merrie,' this would not be the music
which they were called upon to practise twice a
week in preparation for the next service.
It is to the reign of Charles I. that we owe the
first certain glimpse of early Scotish folk-music.
All that was known of it had come down by tradi
tion, till the discovery — only in the present cen
tury — of two MSS. of this date, which establish
the existence of a number of tunes whose age and
form were previously entirely conjectural. These
are the Straloch and Skene MSS. The first was
written by Robert Gordon of Straloch, Aberdeen-
shire, in 1627-29. It was presented to Dr. Bur-
ney in 1781, but the present possessor is not
known. Fortunately it was in 1839 submitted
to G. Farquhar Graham, who, by permission,
made an excerpt from it of all that was worthy of
preservation, and presented this to the Advocates'
Library. The copy was of course exact, and con
tained all the errors of the original, which were
numerous : these make a translation from the Lute
Tablature — in which it is written — into the
usual notation a very arduous task, requiring
much patience, knowledge, and ingenuity.
The second is a much more important MS.
It was formed by or for John Skene of Hallyards,
Midlothian, and has no date ; but its seven parts,
now bound together, seem from internal evidence
to have been written at various times up to about
1635. In general it is much more correct than
the last, its versions are occasionally excellent ;
its Scotish airs, after rejecting dances and
everything else not of home . growth, are not
fewer than forty. Above all, it contains the
ancient original melody of ' The flowers of the
forest' ; whose simple pathos forbids our believing
it to be the expression of any but a true sorrow,
the wail of a mourner for those who would never
return — and which no doubt is nearly coeval
with Flodden. The MS. was published in 1838 by
Mr. Wm. Dauney, with a Dissertation, excellent
in many respects, on the subject of Scotish
music. He was greatly assisted by G. Farquhar
Graham, who not only translated the MS. from
Lute Tablature, but contributed much musical
and other information. In order to give some
idea of the style of writing in Tablature a wood
cut of a small portion of the MS. is inserted.
A
•h i' S
As these MSS. had not been discovered in
442
SCOTISH MUSIC.
Ritson's time, it does not surprise one to find
him saying in his letters (1791) that 'the Scot-
ish airs that could be satisfactorily proved to
have existed earlier than the Restoration are
in all only twenty-four.' If from these are de
ducted all that do not fall under the head of
folk-music* then his estimate must be reduced
by nearly, a half, for he included part-songs such
as '0 lusty May'; several tunes now known
to be English ; and, notwithstanding his noted
scepticism, even the air which, for want of an
earlier name, is called 'Hei tuti taiti' ; appending
this note however — ' said, without the slightest
probability, to have been King Robert Bruce's
march to Bannockburn.' These MSS. enlarge this
estimate considerably. Leaving out the English
airs and foreign dances, upwards of fifty tunes
must be added to it. Some of them are in a
rather uudimentary state, but distinctive traita
serve to identify them with certain known tunes.
The versions of others are simple and beautiful,
often greatly preferable to those of the same
airs handed down traditionally. Although the
number of melodies that can thus be traced in
the J7th century is still comparatively small,
yet it must be evident to all who have studied
the subject, that a much larger number, then
in existence, did not appear either in print or in
manuscuipt till the following century. Not till
then do we find 'Aye waukin 0,' 'Waly waly,'
'Barbara Allan,' ' Ca the yowes,' 'Gala water,'
'I had a horse,' and many others equally old.
Ramsay and Thomson (1725) omitted these and
similar simple airs from their collections, while
florid tunes such as ' John Hay's bonnie las-ue '
and ' Love is the cause of my mourning ' abound
in their volumes. The taste of their times was
for ornament, in ours it is for simplicity ; indeed
the very simplicity which we prize they seem to
have despised.
The extreme rarity of MSS. such as those
mentioned is greatly to be regretted. The never-
ceasing wars upon the borders, and the private
feuds throughout the rest of the kingdom, with
their consequent destruction of castles and keeps,
abbeys and cathedrals, have had much to do with
the sweeping away of musical records of ancient
date which would otherwise have come down
to us.
From some anecdotes told of Charles II. he
seems to have had a great liking for Scotish
music, and certainly from the Restoration it be
came popular in England. This is shown by the
almost innumerable imitations of the style that
are to be found in the various publications of
John Play ford. They are usually simply called
'Scotch tunes,' but sometimes the name of the
composer is given, showing that no idea of strict
nationality attached to them. In general they
are worthless ; but occasionally excellent melodies
appear among them, such as ' She rose and let me
in,' ' Over the hills and far away,' 'De'il take the
wars,' 'Sawney was tall' (Corn rigs), 'In January
last ' (Jock of Hazeldean), all of which, with
many others of less note, have been incorporated
in Scotish Collections, at first from ignorance,
SCOTISH MUSIC.
afterwards from custom, and without further en
quiry. There are however many tunes, not to be
confounded with the.^e, which two or even three
centuries ago were common to the northern
counties of England and the adjoining counties
of Scotland, the exact birthplace of which will
never be satisfactorily determined ; for we agree
with Mr. H. F. Chorley in believing that the
first record in print does not necessarily decide
the parentage of a tune.
Among these — though rather on account of the
words than the music — may be classed the famous
song ' Tak your auld cloak about ye,' which
having been found in Bishop Percy's Ancient
MS. has been claimed as entirely English. The
Rev. J. W. Ebsworth, a very high authority,
believes it to be the common property of the
Border counties of both nations. Probably it is
so ; yet it seems strange that so excellent a
ballad, if ever popularly known in England,
should have so utterly disappeared from that
country as not to be even mentioned in any
English work, or by any English author with the
exception of Shakspere, who has quoted one stanza
of it in Othello. Not a line of it is to be found
in the numerous ' Drolleries ' of the Restoration,
in the publications of Playford and D'Urfey, or
in the ' Merry Musicians ' and other song-books
of the reign of Queen Anne. Even the printers
whose presses sent forth the thousands of black-
letter ballads that fill the Roxburgh, Pepys,
Bagford and other Collections, ignore it entirely.
Allan Ramsay, in 1728, was the first to print it,
nearly forty years before Bishop Percy gave his
version to the world, confessing to have corrected
his own by copies received from Scotland. The
question naturally arises, where did Allan Ram
say get his copy of the ballad, if not from the
singing of the people. Certainly not from England,
for there it was then unknown.
The ancient Percy MS. contains, however,
several excellent stanzas not found elsewhere, as
well as some others that by the total absence of
sense as well as of rhymes show they are corrupt.
In the last stanza the transcriber of the MS. has
given the sound rather than the sense, as con
veyed by the words of the Scotish Version. These
are
Nocht 's to be won at woman's ban'
Unless you gie her a' the plea;
Sae I '11 leave aff where I began
And tak my auld cloak about me.
1 To give one all the plea,' is a common Scotish
phrase for giving up the whole subject that is in
debate. The Percy MS. says
It's not for a man with a woman to threape
Unless he first give over the play :
We will live now as we began
And I'll have myne old cloak about me.
A critical comparison in detail of the two
versions would be out of place here, but it will
well repay the trouble, and reveal many small
points of difference in the national character of
the two countries.
The half century after the Revolution was a
busy one both with Jacobite poetry and music ;
of the former the quantity is so. great as to
SCOTISH MUSIC.
require a volume of its own. In regard to. the
music, little, if any of it, was new, for the writers
of the words had the wisdom to adapt their verses
to melodies that every one knew and could sing.
Thus many old favourite tunes got new names,
while others equally old have perhaps been saved
to us by their Jacobite words, their early names
being entirely lost. The story of the battle of
Killiecrankie 1689 is one of the earliest of these
songs, and enjoys the distinction of having a
Latin translation, beginning
Grahamius notabilis coegerat Montanos
Qui clypeis et gladiis fugarunt Anglicanos,
Fugerant Vallicolae atque Puritan!
Cacavere Batavi et Cameroniani.
It is sung to a Gaelic tune of its own name, so
quickly and so widely spread as to be found in
a Northumbrian MS. of 1694, as the Irish
Gillicranky. It is a. stirring bagpipe tune, no
doubt older than the words.
A still more celebrated a:r, now known as
'Scots wha hae,' received its name of 'Hey tuti
t;dti' from a stanza of a song of 1716 (?), 'Here's
to the king, sir ; Ye ken wha I mean, sir;' The
stanza is worth quoting, and would be yet more so
could it tell us the still earlier name of the tune,
a subject which has caused much discussion.
When you hear the trumpet soun'
Tuti taiti to t'ie drum,
Up sword, and down gun,
And to the loons again.
The words 'Tuti taiti' are evidently only an
attempted imitation of the trumpet notes, and
not the name of the air. To suppose that the
tune itself was played on the trumpet as a battle
call is too absurd for consideration. As the air
Las a good deal in common with ' My dearie,
an thou dee,' there seems considerable probability
that it was another version of the same, or that
the one gave rise to the other, a thing likely
enough to happen in days when there being no
books to refer to, one singer took his tune as he
best could from his neighbour.
' When the king comes owre the water ' —
otherwise ' Boyne water ' — is a. good example of
change of name ; the air has recently been dis
covered in a MS. of 1694, where it is called
' Playing amang the rashes,' a line of an old
Scotish song recovered by Allan Ramsay, and
printed in his 'Tea Table Miscellany' 1724— a
fact which seems somewhat to invalidate the Irish
claim to the tune.
When the king comes owre the water.
(Playing amang the rashes.)
Prom W. GRAHAM'S Flute Book (MS. i6Q4).
SCOTISH MUSIC.
443
The Jacobite words are said to have been
written by Lady Keith M arisen all, mother of
the celebrated Marshal Keith, a favourite general
of Frederic the Great.
The old air, already mentioned, ' My dearie,
an thou dee,' may be pointed out as the tune of
an excellent Jacobite song 'Awa, Whigs, awa,'
and of another — the name of which is all that
has come down to us — ' We're a' Mar's men,'
evidently alluding to the Earl of Mar, general
issimo of James's forces in Scotland in 1715.
Another of the songs of 1715, 'The piper o*
Dundee,' gives the names of a number of tunes
supposed to be played by the piper — Carnegie of
Finhaven — to stir up the chiefs and their clans
to join the Earl of Mar.
He pla.y'd the 'Welcome o'er the main,'
And 'Ye'se be fou and Fse be fain,'
And 'Auld Stuarts back again,'
Wi' meikle mirth and glee.
He play'd 'The Kirk; he play'd ' The Quier,' [ -hoir]
' The Mullin dhu' and 'Chevalier,'
And ' Lang away but welcome here,'
Sae sweet, sae bonnilie.
Notwithstanding the diligence of collectors and
annotators some of these songs and tunes have
eluded recognition, chiefly because of a, habit of
those times to name a tune by any line of a song
— not necessarily the first — or by some casual
phrase or allusion that occurred in- it.
Other noted songs of this date are ' Carle an
(if) the King come ' ; ' To daunton me ' ; ' Little
wat ye wha's comin,' the muster-roll of the
clans ; ' Will ye go to Sheriffmuir ' ; and ' Ken-
mure's on and awa.'
A striking phase of Jacobite song was un
sparing abuse of the House of Hanover ; good
specimens of it are ' The wee wee German
lairdie,' ' The sow's tail to Geordie,' and above
all, 'Cumberland's descent into hell,' which is so
ludicrous and yet so horrible that the rising
laugh is checked by a shudder. This however
belongs to the '45, the second rising of the clans.
Of the same date is ' Johnie Cope,' perhaps the
best-known of all the songs on the subject. It is
said to have been written immediately after the
battle of Prestonpans, by Adam Skirving, the
father of a Scottish artist of some reputation. No
song perhaps has so many versions; Hogg
says it was the boast of some rustic singer that
he knew and could sing all its 19 variations.
Whether it was really Skirving's or not, he
certainly did write a rhyming account of the
battle, in 15. double stanzas relating the inci
dents of the fight — who fled and who stayed —
winding up with his own experiences.
That afternoon when a' was done
I gaed to. see the fray, man,
But had I wist what after past,
I'd better staid away, man ;
On Seton sands, -wi' nimble hands,
They pick'd my pockets bare, man ;
But I wish ne'er to drie sic fear,
For a' the sum and mair, man.
Few of these old songs are now generally
known ; the so-called Jacobite songs, the favour
ites of our time, being almost entirely modern.
Lady Nairne, James Hogg, Allan Cunningham,
Sir Walter Scott, may be named as the authors
444
SCOTISH MUSIC.
of the greater portion of them. In most cases
the tunes also are modern. ' Bonnie Prince
Charlie ' and ' The lament of Flora Macdonald '
are both compositions of Neil Gow, the grand
son of old Neil the famous reel-player — ' He's
SCOTISH MUSIC.
owre the hills that I loe weel/ 'Come o'er the
stream. Charlie,' 'The bonnets of bonnie Dundee '
(Claverhouse), are all of recent origin ; even
' Charlie is my darling ' — words and music — is a
modern rifacimento of the old song.
Charlie is my darling.
=£3
The Old Air.
One exception to this ought to be noted; the tune
now known as ' Wae 's me for Prince Charlie ' is
really ancient. In the Skene MS. (1635) it is
called ' Lady Cassilis' Lilt ' ; it is also known as
' Johnny Faa/ and ' The Gypsy laddie,' all three
names connected with what is now believed to be
a malicious ballad written against an exemplary
wife in order to annoy her Covenanting husband,
the Earl of Cassilis, who was not a favourite.
Enough has been said of these relics of an en
thusiastic time, but the subject is so extensive that
it is not easy to be concise. Those who wish to
know more of it will find in the volumes of James
Hogg and Dr. Charles Mackay all that is worthy
of being remembered of this episode of Scotish song.
OF THE SCOTTISH SCALES AND CLOSES.
The existence of Scotish airs constructed on
the series I, 2, 3, 5, 6 of a major diatonic scale
is well known and has been already alluded to.
"Whether this pentatonic series was acquired
through the use of a defective instrument, or
from the melodic taste of singer or player, must
remain mere matter of conjecture. The style
itself may be accepted as undoubtedly ancient,
whatever uncertainty there may be as to the
exact age of the airs constructed on it. These
are not by any means numerous, though their
characteristic leap between the third and fifth,
and sixth and eighth of the scale, is so common
in Scotish melody, that many persons not only
believe the greater part of our airs to be penta
tonic, but do not admit any others to be Scotish.
However the taste for this style may have arisen,
the series of notes was a very convenient one ;
for an instrument possessing the major diatonic
scale in one key only, could play these airs
correctly in the three positions of the scale where
major thirds are found, that is, on the first,
fourth and fifth degrees. In the key of C, these
are as shown below, adding the octave to the
lowest note of the series in each case.
Pentatonic scale in three positions, without change
of signature.
12356 8 1235 6 123, 56 -
^ESBE
It would not be quite correct to term these the
keys of C, F, and G, for they want the charac
teristic notes of each scale ; still it is convenient
to do so, especially as in harmonising tunes written
in this series it is frequently necessary to use the
omitted intervals, the fourth and seventh, and also
to affix the proper signature of the key as usual
at the beginning. If, reversing the order of the
notes given above, we begin with the sixth, and
passing downwards add the octave below, the
feeling of a minor key is established, and keys
of A, D and E minor seem to be produced. Be
sides tunes in these six keys, a few others will be
found, which begin and end in G minor (signature
two flats), though also played with natural notes ;
for B and E being avoided in the melody neither
of the flats is required.
A curious peculiarity of tunes written in this
series is, that from the proximity of the second
and third positions phrases move up and down
from one into the other, thus appearing to be
alternately in the adjoining keys a full tone
apart, moving for example from G into F and
vice versa.
The following are good examples of the style.
(i) Gala Water.
- j
!SE
(2) Were na my heart licht I wad die.
SCOTISH
MUSIC.
(3) The bridegroom grat.
D
w
—jr
iMHr-
— »— ' 9 1*-
-m -tt-rt 4 r»
SCOTISH MUSIC.
445
When the sheep are In the fauld and the kye at name, And
I
a' the warld to sleep are gane, The waes o'my heart fa' in
E^fct^
•P-E
t^C
&
^
show'rs frae my e'e, While my gude-man lies sound by me
The first, ' Gala Water,' is one of the most
beautiful of our melodies. The modern version
of it contains the seventh of the scale more than
once, but Oswald has preserved the old penta-
tonic version in his Caledonian Pocket Companion
(i 759-65). That version is here given in the
large type, the small type showing the modern
alterations. The air may be played correctly
beginning on E, on A, or on B, representing the
third of the keys of C, F and G ; but neither flat
nor sharp is required in any of the positions, the
notes being all natural throughout.
The second is the melody to which Lady Grizel
Baillie wrote (1692) her beautiful ballad, 'Were
na my heart licht, I would die/ It is a very
simple unpretending tune, and is given chiefly on
account of its close ; indeed, both of these tunes are
peculiar, and will again be more fully referred to.
The third is the old tune which was so great
a favourite with Lady Anne Lyndsay that she
wrote for it her celebrated ballad ' Auld Robin
Gray.' Although it has been superseded by a
very beautiful modern English air, it ought not
to be entirely forgotten.
Anotherexceedingly beautiful pentatonic melody
is that to which Burns wrote '0 meikle thinks my
love of my beauty.' It will be found in E minor
in the ' Select Songs of Scotland,' by Professor
Macfarren — no worthier arranger of our melo
dies could be named — but it may also be played
in D minor and A minor, in each case without
either flat or sharp being required in the melody.
To recapitulate. All tunes in this style, if
treated as mere melodies, can be written as if in
the key of C, without either flat or sharp ; al
though if harmonised, or accompanied, the same
notes may require the signature of one sharp or
one flat. There are also a few tunes which even
require that of two flats, although none of the
characteristic notes of these scales appear in the
melody. The style in its simplest form, as in
' Were na my heart licht,' is somewhat monoton
ous, and considerable skill is often shown in the
intermingling of major and minor phrases, not
merely by means of the related keys, but by
transitions peculiar to the old tonality.
The use of this imperfect Pentatonic scale in
our early music must gradually have ceased,
through acquaintance with the music of the
church service, which had a completed diatonic
scale, though with a considerable want of a de
fined key-note. Without going into any intri
cacies, the church tones may, for our present
purpose, be accepted as in the scale of C major,
untrammeled by any consideration of a key-note,
free to begin and end in any part of the scale
according to circumstances ; the sounds remaining
the same wherever the scale might begin or end.
This completed scale, which we find in the
simple Shepherd's Pipe or Recorder, is really
that on which our older melodies are formed.
The pitch note might be D or G, or any other, but
the scale would be the ordinary major diatonic,
with the semitones between the 3rd and 4th and
7th and 8th degrees. The key of C is that
adopted in the following remarks. With scarcely
an exception the old tunes keep steadily to this
scale without the use of any accidental. It will
also be seen that the pathos produced by means
of the 4th of the key, is a clever adaptation of a
necessity of the scale. ' The Flowers of the Forest'
— fortunately preserved in the Skene MS. — is a
fine example of the skill with which the unskilled
composer used the meagre means at his disposal.
The first strain of the air is in G major, as will
be seen if it be harmonised, though no F sharp
was possible 6n the instrument ; in the second
strain, no more affecting wail for the disaster of
Flodden could have been produced than that
effected by the use of the Ft], the 4th of the scale
of the instrument, the minor 7th of the original
key. With his simple pipe the composer has
thus given the effect of two keys.
The Flowers of the Forest. Ancient Version.
It may be objected that the voice was not tied
down to the notes of an imperfect instrument,
and could take semitones wherever it felt them
to be wanted ; but we must not forget that in
those days our modern scales were unknown un
less to scientific musicians, and that the voice,
like the instrument, kept to the old tonality, the
only scale which it knew.
The same effect of playing in two keys occurs
in ' 0 waly waly ! love is bonnie, a little while
when it is new,' but in most modern versions of
the melody both the Ft) and Ftf are found ; this
was not possible on the primitive instrument,
though easy on the lute or violin.
0 waly wafy.
^^
*
446
SCOTISH MUSIC.
Any air which has the natural as well as the
altered note may be set down as either modern,
or as having been tampered with in modern
times. The major seventh in a minor key is also a
sure sign of modern writing or modern meddling,
though it cannot be denied that the natural note,
the minor seventh, sounds somewhat barbarous to
the unaccustomed ear — and yet grand effects are
produced by means of it. In a tune written
otherwise in the old tonality, the occurrence of
the major seventh sounds weak and effeminate
when compared with the robust grandeur of the
full tone below.
A few more examples may be given to show
the mingling of the pentatonic with the com
pleted scale. 'Adieu Dundee' — also found in
the Skene MS. — is an example of a tune written
as if in the natural key, and yet really in a
modified G minor.
Adew Dundee.
Of course in harmonising the tune it would be
necessary to write it in two flats ; but in the
melody the B is entirely avoided and the ED in
the 1 5th bar is used to modulate into D minor,
thus skilfully making a note available which
belonged to the scale of the instrument though
not to that of the tune. Another example is
' The wauking of the fauld,' which, played in the
same key (G minor), has the same peculiarity in
the 1 3th bar; this however is the case only in
modern versions of the air, for that given by
Allan Ramsay in the 'Gentle Shepherd' (.1736)
is without the E.
The closes of Scotish tunes are often so singular
that a notice of their peculiarities ought not to
be omitted. The explanation of the fact that
almost every note of the scale is found in use as
a close, is really not difficult, if the circumstances
are taken into consideration. In the olden time,
many of the tunes were sung continuously to
almost interminable ballads, a full close at the
end of every quatrain was therefore not wanted.
While the story was incomplete the old minstrel
no doubt felt that the music should in like man
ner show that there was more to follow, and
intentionally finished his stanza with a phrase
not to be regarded as a close, but rather as a
preparation for beginning the following one;
though when he really reached the end he may
possibly have concluded with the key-note.
The little tune ' Were na my heart licht ' [p.
444 &] is an excellent example of what has just
been said. It consists of four rhythms of two
bars each ; a modern would have changed the
places of the third and fourth rhythms, and
finished with the key-note, but the old singer
SCOTISH MUSIC.
intentionally avoids this, and ends with the second
of the scale, a half close on the chord of the
dominant.
Endings on the second or seventh of the scale
are really only half closes on intervals of the
dominant chord, the fifth of the key. Endings
on the third and fifth again are half closes on
intervals of the tonic chord or key-note, while
those on the sixth are usually to be considered as
on the relative minor ; and occasionally the third
may be treated as the fifth of the same chord.
To finish in so unusual a manner has been called
inexplicable, and unsatisfactory to the ear, whereas
viewed as mere specimens of different forms of
Da Capo these endings become quite intelligible,
the object aimed at being a return to the begin
ning and not a real close.
OF THE GAELIC Music.
If the difficulty of estimating the age of the
music of the Lowlands is great, it is as nothing
compared to what is met with in considering
that of the Highlands.
When a Gael speaks of an ancient air he seems
to measure its age not by centuries ; he carries us
back to pre-historic times for its composition. The
Celts certainly had music even in the most remote
ages, but as their airs had been handed down for
so many generations solely by tradition, it may
be doubted whether this music bore any striking
resemblance to the airs collected between 1760
and 1780 by the Rev. Patrick McDonald and his
brother. That he was well fitted for the task he
had set himself is borne out by the following
extract from a letter addressed to the present
writer in 1849 ^J that excellent water-colourist
Kenneth Macleay, R.S.A. He says, 'My grand
father, Patrick Macdonald, minister of Kilmore
and Kilbride in Argyllshire — who died in 1824
in the 97th year of his age — was a very admir
able performer on the violin, often played at the
concerts of the St. Cecilia Society in Edinburgh
last century, and was the first who published a
collection of Highland airs. These were not only
collected but also arranged by himself.' In the
introduction to the work there are many excellent
observations regarding the style and age of the
tunes. The specimens given of the most ancient
music are interesting only in so far as they show
the kind of recitative to which ancient poems
were chanted, for they have little claim to notice
as melodies. The example here given is said to
be 'Ossian's soliloquy on the death of all his
contemporary heroes/
P
*J K,
Slow.
There are however many beautiful airs in the
collection ; they are simple, wild, and irregular ;
but before their beauty can be perceived they
must be sung or hummed over again and again.
Of the style of performance the editor says : —
'These airs are sung by the natives in a wild, arlle??,
and irregular manner. Chiefly occupied with the senti
ment and expression of the music, they dwell upon tlie
SCOTISH MUSIC.
SCOTISH MUSIC.
447
long and pathetic notes, while they hurry over the in
ferior and connecting notes, in such a manner as to
render it exceedingly difficult for a hearer to trace the
measure of them. They themselves while singing ihem
seem to have little or no impression of measure.'
This is more particularly the case with the very
old melodies, which wander about without any
attempt at rhythm, or making one part answer
to another. The following air ia an excellent
example of the style : —
Wet is the night and cold.
In contrast to these are the Liuneags, short
snatches of melody ' sung by the women, not
only at their diversions but also during almost
every kind of work where more than one person is
employed, as milking cows and watching the folds,
fulling of cloth, grinding of grain with the quern,
or hand-mill, haymaking, and cutting down corn.
The men too have iorrums or songs for rowing, to
which they keep time with their oars.' Mr. T.
Pattison (Gaelic Bards), tells us that this word
Jorram (pronounced yirram), means not only a
boat-song but also a lament, and that it acquired
this double meaning from the Jorram being often
' chanted in the boats that carried the remains of
chiefs and nobles over the Western seas to lona.'
Patrick Macdonald says 'the very simplicity
of the music is a pledge of its originality and
antiquity.' Judged by this criticism his versions
of the airs seem much more authentic than those
of his successors. Captain Fraser of Knockie,
who published a very large and important collec
tion of Highland airs in 1816, took much pains,
in conjunction with a musical friend, to form
what he terms a ' standard.' As he had no taste
for the old tonality, he introduces the major
seventh in minor keys, and his versions generally
abound in semitones. He professed a liking for
simplicity, and is not sparing of his abuse of
Mac Gibbon and Oswald for their departures from
it ; yet his own turns, and shakes, and florid
passages, prove that he did not carry his theory
into practice. As however a large portion of his
volume is occupied with tunes composed during
the latter part of the last century and the begin
ning of the present, in these it would be affecta
tion to expect any other than the modern tonality.
A specimen of what he says is an ancient Os-
sianic air is given as a contrast to that selected
from Patrick Macdonald. In style it evidently
belongs to a date much nearer to the times of
Mac Pherson thc.n to those of Ossian.
An air to which Qssian is recited.
Slow.
tr
It cannot be denied that though by his altera
tions of the forms of Gaelic melody Fraser may
have rendered them more acceptable to modern
ears, he has undoubtedly shorn the received
versions of much of their claim to antiquity. The
volume recently published by the Gaelic Society
of London (1876), though not faultless in regard
to modern changes, has restored some of the old
readings ; one example ought to be quoted, for
the air ' Mairi bhan og' is very beautiful, and
the Fft in the fourth bar gives us back the
simplicity and force of ancient times.
Mairi bhan og. (Mary fair and young.)
Captain Fraser stigmatises the previous collec
tions of Patrick Macdonald and Alexander Camp
bell (Albyn's Anthology) as very incorrect. But
Fraser' s own versions have in many cases been
much altered in the second edition (1876), while
more recent works — notably that issued by the
Gaelic Society of London — differ most remarkably
from earlier copies. The airs are evidently still
in a plastic state, every glen, almost every family
seems to have its own version. It may perhaps
be admitted that those of Fra; er, when divested
of his tawdry embellishments and chromatic in
tervals may be found to represent fairly the
general taste of the present day.
There has been a good deal of controversy in
former times about Highland and Lowland, Irish
and Gaelic claims to certain melodies : most of
the former seem pretty well settled, but both
Irish and Gael still hold to ' Luchaber.' That it
is Celtic is apparent from its style, but whether
Hiberno- or Scoto- Celtic is not so clear. The
earliest documentary evidence for the tune is a
Scotish MS. of 1690 (T) — afterwards the property
of Dr. Leyden — where it is called 'King James'
march to Ireland.' Macaulay, again, says t'nat
an Irish tune was chosen for James' march ; but
it must not be forgotten t'nat in Scotland at that
time and for more than a century later, the term
Tiish was used whenever anything connected with
the Highlands was spoken of. The language was
448
SCOTISH MUSIC.
called indifferently Irish, Eerish, Ersch, and
Erse ; so that the Scots themselves would then
style the tune Irish while they meant Highland
or Gaelic. Of course the air could not at that
time be known as 'Lochaber,' for Allan Ramsay
did not write his celebrated song till more than
twenty years after that date ; but no doubt it
had a Gaelic name, now apparently lost. It had
a Lowland name however, for Burns found it in
Ayrshire as the tune of the old ballad ' Lord
Ronald my son,' which is traditional not only in
that county, but also in Ettrick forest, where Sir
Walter Scott recovered it under the name of
' Lord Randal.' As this version consists of one
part only, it is believed to be the most ancient
now known. Mr. Chappell has recently pointed
out that the air seems to have first appeared in
print in the 'Dancing Master' of 1701, under the
name of ' Reeve's Maggot,' so that but for the
style England might almost make some claim to
the tune. As for the allegation that Thomas
Duffet's song ' Since Celia's my foe,' written
1675, was originally sung to it, Mr. Chappell has
shown that to be an error. He prints the original
Irish tune of ' Celia,' and also a very good version
of 'Lochaber,' which superseded it about 1730-
(See Ballad Society's ' Roxburgh Ballads,' part 8.)
Bunting, who claims the air under the name of
'Limerick's Lamentation,' prints what he seems
to think is the original version in his volume of
1809. It is certainly one of the worst that has
ever appeared, and if being overlaid with what
is called the ' Scotch snap ' will make it Scotish,
then no further evidence would be required of
the strength of the Gaelic claim. The version is
so peculiar, and so little known, that it is given
below. Much more might no doubt be said on
both sides, in all likelihood without coming to
any definite conclusion ; the composition of the
tune may therefore be left as a moot point ; both
countries have indeed so many fine airs that they
can afford to leave it so.
Limerick's Lamentation. (Bunting 1809.)
It is evident from the examples given by
Patrick Macdonald that in the most ancient
times Gaelic music was devoid of rhythm. The
SCOTISH MUSIC.
Ossianic chants are short and wild. They are
succeeded by longer musical phrases, well suited
it may be to heighten the effect of the Gaelic
verse, but apart from that, formless, and uninter
esting as mere music. From these emerge airs
still wild and irregular, but with a certain sub
limity arising from their very vagueness. Eveu
when they become more rhythmic, the airs do
not at once settle down into phrases of twos and
fours, but retain an easy indifference to regularity;
two alternating with three, four with five bars,
and this in so charming a way that the ease and
singularity are alone apparent. The air ' Morag '
may be quoted ; other examples will be found in
Albyn's Anthology 1816-18, and in 'Grain na
h-Albain,' an excellent collection of Gaelic airs
made by Miss Bell and edited by Finlay Dun.
A glance at some of our printed collections of
Scotish airs may not be uninteresting.
The earliest, and the only one known to have appeared
in Scotland in the 17th century, is that usually called
' Forbes's Cantus,' from the name of the publisher. The
first edition of it was printed at Aberdeen in 1662, a
second and third following in 1666 and 1682. It was in
tended for tuition, and contains the soprano (or cantus)
parts only of short pieces for 3, 4, and 5 voices. The
other voice parts were probably never printed, for a few
copies only would be wanted for use at examinations
and exhibitions of the pupils, and these would doubtless
be supplied in MS. ; it is not therefore surprising that
none are known to exist. The work was evidently a
compilation of pieces, chiefly in the scholastic style of
the time. Some of them, set to Scotish words by Mont
gomery and Scot, are probably of home origin ; others
are certainly English, notably Morley's ballet 'Now
is the month of Maying,' and three ballad tunes, ' For
tune my foe,' 'Crimson velvet,' and 'Love will find out
the way.' The first of these— set to ' Sathan my foe full
of iniquity' — Mr. Chappell informs us, was known as
the Hanging tune, from ' the metrical lamentations of
extraordinary criminals being always chanted to it.'
The only tune in the volume with any Scotish character
istics is ' The gowans are gay, my jo,' which is written on
four notes, and ends on the second of the scale. It is
easy to see that popular Scotish tunes were intentionally
avoided, as the object of the work was to teach the young
to read at sight, and not to sing by ear.
The next Scotish publication is that of Allan Kamsay,
who did much to secure many of our old songs and tunes
from further chance of being lost by his 'Tea Table
Miscellany,' 1724, and by the little volume containing
the airs of the principal songs, 1726. No doubt his chief
object in this work was to give new and more decorous
words for the old airs, and in some instances may thus
have secured their coming down to us. His ' Gentle
Shepherd' (1736, with music) did the same good office.
Previous to this there had been several publications in
England which contained a few Scotish airs. 'The
Dancing Mastfr,' brought out by John Playford in 1651,
and re-issued with constant additions up to the 17th
edition in 1721, contained a very few. Two of these may
be named, 'The broom of the Cowden Knowes,' and
'Katherine ogie' ; the former has a close on the second
of the key, and the latter, though slightly altered in ' The
Dancing Master,' is pentatonic in 'Apollo's Banquet,
1690, and in Graham's Flute-book, 16:i4. It must be ad
mitted that the work contains a considerably larger
number of English airs, which having become favourites
on the north of the border, and had good songs written
to them, are now stoutly maintained to be Scotish. The
' Oyle of Barley ' has become ' Up in the morning early ^
' A health to Betty,' ' My mither 's ay glowrin o'er me ;
'Buff coat' is 'The deuks dang owre my daddie'; 'The
Hemp dresser,' ' The deil cam fiddling thro' the town ;
and this does not by any means complete the list ofour
obligations to our southern neighbours. Mr. Win.
Chappell' s excellent work has done much to enlighten
us on this subject
The earliest collpction professing to contain Scotisn
melodies only is that published by Henry Playford
(London, 1700). His title is 'A Collection of Original
Scotch-Tunes (Full of the Highland Humours) for the
Violin. Being the First of this Kind yet Printed.' A
large portion of the work consists of dance tunes— Scotisn
SCOTISH MUSIC.
SCOTISH MUSIC.
449
measures chiefly— to many of which words have since
been written. Among the true vocal melodies are found
for the first time 'Bessie Bell,' 'The Collier's dochter,'
'My wife has ta'en the gree,' 'Widow are ye wauken,'
' Good night and joy be with you,' ' For old (lang) syne,
my jo,' 'Allan water,' and ' Wae 'a my heart that we maun
sunder." We are thua particular because there is but
one known copy of the work in existence. It is now the
property of Alex. W. Inglis, Esq., of Edinburgh. Unlike
many, who are chary of sharing their treasures with
others, he ia at present preparing a fac-simile of the
little volume, for private distribution ; and it is perhaps
no indiscretion to add that some other rare works may
follow, with annotations, or possibly a dissertation on
the subject of Scotish music, to which Mr. Inglis's
well-known tastes have led him to give considerable
attention. This work was succeeded in 1725 by the
' Orpheus Caledonius,' the first collection in which the
words were united to the melodies. The editor of the
work, William Thomson, does not appear to have been
a man of much research or to have known very much of
his subject. His versions of the airs are frequently not
very good, and occasionally he not only uses English
words for the tunes, but even includes some English
melodies in the work. He was a singer with a fine voice
and a 'sweet pathetic style,' was a favourite at court,
where his services were often in demand. The volume
contained 50 melodies, and was dedicated to the Princess
of Wales — afterwards the Queen Caroline of Jeanie
Deans. It must have been successful, as a second edition
in two volumes, with double the number of tunes, ap
peared in 1733. Of the words it may be sufficient to say,
that though most of them were great improvements on
the older versions, some would not be tolerated in any
drawing-room in the days of Queen Victoria.
The number of Collections which appeared in Scotland,
from Adam Craig's in 1730 down to our own times, shows
how continuously these tunes have held their ground,
not in Scotland only, but throughout the three king
doms. Perhaps the most noteworthy of all is Johnson's
'Museum.' It was issued by an engraver, who, as the
preface informs us, intended that its contents should
embrace the favourite songs of the day without regard
to nationality. Objections having been made to this, he
after the first half volume confined it, or at least in
tended to confine it, to Scotish music. Its celebrity has
arisen from its connection with Robert Burns, who wrote
many of his happiest songs for it, becoming virtually its
unpaid editor. His prediction that it would become the
text-book of Scotish song for all time, has been amply
verified, for modern editors still consult its pages, and
future editors must continue to do so. Its first volume ap-
peai-ed in 1787, and its sixth, and last, in 1803 ; each volume
contains 100 airs, many of them taken down from the
singing of country girls, and never before in print. Much
of this was done by Burns himself ; for, as he said, he was
ready to beg, borrow, or steal, for the furtherance of the
work. It has been doubted whether he possessed suf
ficient knowledge of music to enable him to note down
music ; but it has been satisfactorily proved that he
played the violin well enough to catch up by ear any
easy tunes he heard: that he afterwards transmitted
them to Johnson, for arrangement by Stephen Clarke, is
known from his letters. The notes written by Wm. Sten-
house for Messrs. Blackwood's new edition of the work are
often very valuable ; after making every deduction for
his persistent wrongheadedness in regard to English
music, much solid antiquarian information remains,
which must have been utterly lost, but for his persever
ing researches, added to his personal knowledge. He
had however formed a theory that the English had no
national music, and whenever any tune was equally
known in both kingdoms, he presumed that it neces
sarily belonged to his own country, thus sending abroad
erroneous notions which have been quoted by many
authors who have not taken the trouble to verify his
statements.
The songs which Burns afterwards wrote for George
Thomson's celebrated work are more highly finished,
but they often want the ease, the abandon, which form a
great part of the charm of Scotish song. They had to
pass through the ordeal of fastidious criticism, for the
large and handsome volumes in which they appeared,
were intended for the highly educated and the wealthy
of the land. The musical arrangements were by Ger
man musicians of the highest standing, whose scientific
knowledge however scarcely made up for their want of
acquaintance with the style of the music. The work is
now only known through the correspondence which
passed between the poet and the editor.
The ' Scotish Minstrel ' (1821-24) ought not to be entirely
passed over, even in this rapid sketch, as Lady Naime
wrote many of her best songs for it. The work was pro-
VOL. III. FT. 3.
j cted by a coterie of ladies, among whom were Miss
Hume (daughter of Baron Hume) and Miss Walker of
Dairy. They thought the Scotish muse, notwithstanding
all that had been done for her. was still somewhat frank
of speech, and they proposed to make her better ac
quainted with the usages of good society ; indeed, they
afterwards went so far as to propose a family edition of
Burns. Erring stanzas they cut out, or rewrote, and aa
for drinking-aongs they would have none of them. Un
doubtedly these ladies were the unacknowledged pioneers
of the Temperance movement. Lady Nairne, who was
always very shy of acknowledging her songs, did not
make herself known even to her publisher — Mr. Purdie—
but contributed them under the initials of B. B. (Mrs.
Bogan of Bogan). There are besides a considerable
number of songs signed S[cotish] M[iustrel] which have
been claimed for her? though it is now believed that
they were joint contributions, and not the work of any
single individual. The musical part of the work was
done in the simple humdrum sort of fashion appreciated
by amateurs of those times. It was the work of R. A.
Smith, who though not a great musician has written a
few simple Scotish melodies which will not be forgotten.
His 'Row weel my Boatie,' is worthy of a wider apprecia
tion than it has yet received.
Later works are legion : that edited by G. F. Graham
ought not to be overlooked, on account of the care be
stowed on the versions of the melodies ; florid passages
being expunged, modern alterations— excepting where
these were decided improvements — restored to the ancient
form, and most useful and judicious notes appended to
each melody.
One line more may be added to notice one of the latest
and beat arrangements of Scotish Melodies, that by
Principal Macfarren. To say that it is worthy to stand
beside his ' Old Enghah Ditties ' ia to give it all praise.
What has been so beautifully said of the words
of our songs (History and Poetry of the Scotish
Border, by Professor Veitch) maybe here quoted
as equally applicable to the tunes : ' The form in
which we now have them must be held as repre
senting the changes and additions, the suggestions
and passing touches of many generations, the
continuous expression of the national heart rather
than individual productions.' [J.M.W.]
The following contributions from another pen
are given as a supplement to the above paper.
One of the most stirring of the Jacobite songs,
and to this day often heard, is 'Awa, Whigs,
Awa/ which in Hogg's edition is set to the old
tune ' My Dearie an thou dee,' from which is
taken the melody of 'What ails this Heart of
mine.' In later times, however, it has been sung
to a more vigorous tune, which first appeared in
the 'Scotish Minstrel/ 1821. It was probably
got from Lady Nairne, who took great interest in
that work. She was of the family of Oliphanfc
of Gask, well-known adherents of the Stuarts.
They were out both in the '15 and the '45, were
attainted, and lost their estates. A cadet of the
family, equally enthusiastic for the dynasty, re
purchased a small part of the property. That he
should sing 'Awa, Whigs, awa' with much vigour
is not to be doubted ; and that the following is
his tune seems to be exceedingly probable : —
Awa Whigs, awa!
SEE
A -wa Whigs, a-wa! A - wa "Whigs, a - wa'. Ye're
=&=t
1STZS
but a pack o' trai-tor loons ; Ye'll do nae gude a - va'
450
SCOTISH MUSIC.
Our this-tlesbloom'd sae fresh and fair, and bon-nle were our
ro - ses, But Whigs cam like a frost In June and
J).C.
wither'd a' our po-sies.
This song, when well sung by a staunch Tory,
never fails to excite his listeners, being capable
of much dramatic expression. It attracted the
keen eye of Burns, who though in politics an
ardent Whig, was still more a poet. With a poet's
comprehensive sympathies and power of appre
ciating, even when he did not wholly agree, he
revised and added to th« original verses, so pre-
SCOTISH MUSIC.
sen ting to us the singular anomaly of the greatest
of Tory songs being written in part by the greatest
of Whig poets. The verses added by Burns are the
two beginning ' Our ancient crown 's fa'n in the
dust,' and 'Grim Vengeance lang has ta'en a
nap.'
In contrast to the above air, 'Wae's me for
Prince Charlie' is unquestionably one of the most
touching of the so-called Jacobite airs. The words
were written early in this century by William
Glen, a Glasgow manufacturer, who died in 1824.
The air appears in the Skene MS., under the
name of ' Ladie Cassilis' Lilt,' and in Johnson's
'Museum' under that of 'Johnnie Faa,' or the
'Gypsie Laddie,' the melody being sung to the
words of an old ballad beginning ' The Gypsies
cam' to our Lord's yett.' Burns, in one of his
letters, says that this is the only song that he
could ever trace to the extensive county of Ayr.
Lady Cassilis1 Lilt.
From the Skene MS. {163$ ?)
Wae 's me for Prince Charlie. Modern version of the same.
m
*-•
33
m
•
The dance music of Scotland may be said to
consist solely of Reels and Strathspeys. Farquhar
Graham mentions, in his introduction to the
volume of the ' Dance Music of Scotland,' edited
by Surenne, that in the oldest MS. collection of
Scotish dance tunes, there are to be found Alle-
mands, Branles, Courantes, Gaillards, Gavottes,
and Voltes — dances imported from France, al
though not all of French origin ; and along with
these some Scotish dance tunes, and a few English
ones. The foreign dances, however, were con
fined to the upper classes, the peasantry keeping
to their own truly national dances, which have
not only survived but have since become fashion
able in the highest circles, alike in England and
Scotland. The manner of singing or playing
on instruments the music of these reels [see
REEL, vol. iii. pp. 91-93] and strathspeys is
quaintly described by the Rev. Dr. Young in the
dissertation prefixed to the collection of Highland
airs published by the Rev. Patrick Macdonald in
1781. He says, the St. Kildeans, being great
lovers of dancing, met together at the close of the
fishing season, and sang and danced, accompanied
by the Jew's harp or trump — their only musical
instrument. The reverend gentleman adds, 'One
or two of these reels sound uncommonly wild
even to those who can relish a rough Highland
reel.' Some of the notes appear to be borrowed
from the cries of the sea-fowl which visit the
outer Hebrides at certain seasons of the year.
At one time the music of these reels and strath
speys over all Scotland was played by the Bag
pipe [see BAGPIPE, vol. i. pp. 123-125], but
at a later period Neil Gow and his sons did
much in promoting the use of the violin in playing
Scotish dance music ; while in our own day
the piano in its turn has to a great extent
superseded the violin. The Gow family, with
the famous Neil at their head, all showed great
originality in their tunes ; ' Caller herrin,' by
his son Nathaniel, has deservedly taken its
place among our vocal melodies, since Lady
Nairne wrote her excellent words for it. But
it is to be regretted that by changing the
characteristic names of many of our old dance
tunes, giving them the titles of the leaders of
fashion of the day, they have created much un
certainty as to the age, and even the composition,
of the tunes themselves. The tempi at which reels
and strathspeys should be taken is naturally to
a great extent a matter of taste, or rather of
feeling. Farquhar Graham has given the move
ment of the reel as ^ = 126 Maelzel, and that of
the strathspey as «d = 94. These tempi are good
to begin with, but the exciting nature of the
Scotch dances tends to induce the players and
dancers to accelerate the speed as the dancing
proceeds ; a tendency graphically described by
Burns in his 'Tarn o' Shanter.'
Two of the best specimens we know of this
characteristic music are the following : — •
SCOTISH MUSIC.
Heel. ' Clydeside Lasses.'
SCOTISH MUSIC.
451
aJE •=*=.-=*
-nTT rrr^
:*=g * j *>-*-*-
-- J — i
^P
-g—
i — p
uj— i
• J J J -j
— i
— «
•
— •
-* J ' •
— »
Strathspey. "Tullochgorum.*
d^
This tune is an example of the mingled 2nd and
3rd positions of the pentatonic series in the key of
D. That is, mixed phrases, now in A now in G-.
Much of this old dance music was constructed
on the scale of the Bagpipe, which may be re
garded as two pentatonic scales placed together,
thus
GAB DE G
A B Cff E Fff A
wluch are in fact the second and third positions
of the pentatonic series in the key of I) major.
[See p. 444.]
There is reason to fear that the art of singing
Scotish songs in their native purity is being
rapidly lost ; nor is this to be wondered at. The
spread of musical education, together with the
general use of the piano in all classes of households,
must of necessity interfere with the old style of
singing Scotish songs in their original and native
simplicity. When sung with a piano accompani
ment their peculiar charm is in great measure lost ;
indeed a Scotish song properly rendered is now to
be heard only in the rural districts, where on a
winter's evening servants and milkmaids sit
round the farmer's 'ingle' and 'lilt' in the
genuine old traditional style. If Scotish song
has suffered at home from the operation of such
changes, it can hardly be said to have bene
fited from the attention it has received in other
quarters. Both executants and composers have
been attracted by its peculiar qualities, and have
sought to bend it to their purposes, or to illustrate
it by their genius ; in both cases with question
able success. Many great artists have attempted
to sing aright some of the finest Scotish airs, but
generally without success, at least to Scotish
audiences. The really great public exponents
of Scotish song were Wilson and Templeton
(tenors), both Scotchmen. Though neither was
a thoroughly educated musician, both in their
youth, without much knowledge of music, learnt
by tradition the real art of singing our national
airs. Catherine Hayes, so famous for her rendering
of Irish airs, comes next as an interpreter of the
simple melodies of Scotland. Clara Novello
studied to good purpose several of the Jacobite
songs ; and other exceptionally gifted and cul
tured artists have been known to rouse their au
diences into enthusiasm, though in most cases
the result was only a succes d'estime. The at
tempts of the most illustrous composers to write
accompaniments to our national songs have fared
no better. And it need not excite much surprise
to find fchat here, as in many similar ill-advised
enterprises, the greater the genius, so misapplied,
the more signal the failure. Beethoven was
employed to write arrangements of Scotish airs,
and although all his arrangementsbear the impress
of his genius, he has too often missed the senti
ment of the simple melodies. The versio'ns of the
airs sent him must have been wretchedly bad,
and they seem to have imbued him with the
idea that the 'Scotch snap' was the chief feature
in the music. He has introduced this * snap' in
such profusion, even when quite foreign to the
air, that the result is at times somewhat comical.
Haydn also wrote symphonies and accompani
ments to many Scotish airs, and though he suc
ceeded better than his great pupil, still in his
case the result, with few exceptions, is not a
great success. Weber, Hummel, Pleyel, and
Kozeluch were still less happy in their endeavours
to illustrate Scotish airs. In later years many
musicians have followed the same task. Of the
many volumes published we distinctly give the
preference to Macfarren's 'Select Scotish Songs';
and yet, admirable as are often Macfarren's
settings, it is difficult to get rid of a feeling of
elaboration in listening to them.
Gg2
452
SCOTISH MUSIC.
To those who are desirous of studying the history
of Scotish music, the following works, selected out
of a list of nearly 150, may be recommended : —
MS. Collections containing Scotish Melodies.
1. SKENE MS.— 1635 (?). Belongs to the Library of the
Faculty of Advocates.
2. STRALOOH MS.— Bobert Gordon of Straloch's MS.
Lute-book, dated 1627—29. The oldest known MS.
containing Scotish airs. The original MS. is a
small oblong 8vo, at one time in the library of
Charles Burney, Mus. Doc.
3. LEYDEN MS.— 1692 (?). Belonged to the celebrated
Doctor John Leyden. It is written in. Tablature
for the Lyra- viol.
Printed Collections.
1. PLAYFORD'S DANCING MASTER.— 1651-1701. Is in
teresting, as perhaps the earliest printed work that
exhibits several genuine Scotish airs.
2. D'URFEY's COLLECTION.— Reprint, 1719. Sir John
Hawkins, in his History of Music, vol. iv. p. 6, says,
'There are many fine Scots airs in the Collection
of Songs by the well-known Tom D'Urfey, intitled
Pills to purge Melancholy, published in the year 1720.
3. THOMSON'S ORPHEUS CALEDONIUS.— 1725-1733. This
is the earliest Collection of Scotish tunes which
contains words with the music.
4. TEA-TABLE MISCELLANY.— 1724. ' Musick for Allan
Bamsay's Collection of Scots Songs, set by Alex
ander Stuart.'
6. ADAM CRAIG'S COLLECTION.— 1730. A Collection of
the choicest Scots Tunea.
6. JAMES OSWALD'S COLLECTIONS.— 1740-1742. There
are three of these Collections. He published also
a larger work under the name of ' The Caledonian
Pocket Companion,' in twelve parts.
7. BREMNER'S COLLECTIONS.— 1749-1764. Bremnei; took
great pains to secure the best version of the airs he
published, in most cases they are used to this day.
8. NEIL STUART'S COLLECTIONS.— Books 1, 2, 3. Thirty
Scots Songs adapted for a Voice and Harpsichord.
The words of Allan Bamsay.
9. FRANCIS PEACOCK'S AIRS.— About 1776. A good se
lection, and good versions.
10. CUMMING'S COLLECTION.— 1770. A curious Collection
of Strathspey or Old Highland Keels. By Angus
Gumming, at Grantown, in Strathspey.
11. NEIL Gow'S REELS.— A Collection of Strathspey
Reels, with a Bass for the Violoncello or Harpsi
chord. By Neil Gow, at Dunkeld.
12. JOHNSON'S SCOTS MUSICAL MUSEUM.— 1787-1803. New
Edition, 1838, with notes. Six vols. 8vo.
13. NAPIER'S COLLECTIONS.— 1790. A Selection of the
most favourite Scots Songs, etc. By "William Napier.
3 vols. Second and third harmonized by Haydn.
21. DAUNEY'S SKENE MS.— 1838. This MS. is written
in Tablature for the Mandola, and was translated
into modern musical notation by Mr. G. Farquhar
Graham, and published with a dissertation by
William Dauney, advocate, Edinburgh.
22. THE DANCE Music OP SCOTLAND.— 1841. A Collec
tion of all the best Reels and Strathspeys, both of
the Highlands and Lowlands, arranged for the
Pianoforte. By J. T. Surenne. In one volume, folio.
Wood and Co., Edinburgh.
23. WILSON'S SONGS OF SCOTLAND.— Eight Books, folio.
24. WOOD'S SONGS OF SCOTLAND.— 1848-1849. Edited by
G. F. Graham. Three vols, royal 8vo. Edinburgh.
25. ORAIN NA'H ALBAIN.— 1848. A Collection of Gaelic
Songs with English and Gaelic Words. ByFinlay
Dun.
26. LAYS FBOM STRATHEABN. — 1850, By Caroline
Baroness Nairne.
27. BlTSON.— 1869. A/ac-simiZe Reprint. Edited by J. A.
Published by Hopkins, Glasgow.
28. MACFARREN.— 1874. Select Scotish Songs, by G. A.
Macfarren. Glasgow.
29. PATTISON.— Popular Songs of the Highlands. Gaelic
Songs with English and Gaelic Words. 1st vol
(Twelve Songs', 1879 ; 2nd vol. (Twelve Songs) 1881.
Swan and Co., London and Glasgow.
NOTE.— From 1850 to 1874 many collections OF Scotish
Songs were published, all displaying considerable merit;
but as none of them possess any distinctive feature a list
ia not given. [J.M.W.&T.L.S.]
SCOTTISH MUSICAL SOCIETY.
SCOTSON CLARK, the Rev., was born in
London of Irish parents Nov. 16, 1840. He
received his earliest musical instruction from his
mother, a pupil of Chopin and Mrs. Anderson.
His musical tastes became so strongly developed
that he was soon sent to Paris to study the piano
and harmony, and at the age of fourteen was
appointed organist of the Regent Squa,re church.
He next studied under Mr. E. J. Hopkins, and
subsequently entered the Royal Academy of
Music, where his masters were Sterndale Bennett,
Goss, Engel, Pinsuti, and Pettit. In 1858 he
published a Method for the Harmonium, and for
a few years was organist at different churches in
London. In 1865 he founded a 'College of Music'
for students of church music and the organ.
Soon after this, he became organist of Exeter
College, Oxford. He graduated Mus. Bac. in
1867, and was appointed Head Master of St.
Michael's Grammar School, Brighton. Six months
later Mr. Scotson Clark was ordained deacon, and
afterwards priest. He next went to Leipzig, where
he studied under Reinecke, Richter, etc. When
in charge of the English church at Stuttgart he
pursued his musical studies under Lebert, Kruger,
and Pruckner. In 1873 he returned to London,
and in. 1875 resumed his connection with the
London Organ School, the average yearly number
of pupils of which is 300. In 1878 he represented
English organ-playing at the Paris Exhibition.
Mr. Scotson Clark, besides being a remarkable
executant on the organ, has great facility in
composition. His works, which already amount
to over five hundred, consist principally of small
organ and pianoforte pieces, many of which have
attained great popularity. [W.B.S.]
SCOTT, JOHN, nephew of John Sale, jun., was
born about 1776. He was a chorister of St.
George's Chapel, Windsor, and Eton College;
afterwards studied the organ under William
Sexton, organist of St. George's, Windsor, and
became deputy for Dr. Arnold at Westminster
Abbey. He was also chorus master and pianist
at Sadler's Wells. On the erection of the first
organ in Spanish Town, Jamaica, he went out as
organist, and died there in 1815. He was com
poser of the well-known anthem, 'Praise the
Lord, 0 Jerusalem,' as well as of the comic song,
' Abraham Newland.'
'You may Abraham sham, but you mustn't sham
Abraham Newland.'1 r-nr jj JJ "!
SCOTTISH MUSICAL SOCIETY, THE.
In 1 88 1 meetings were held in Glasgow and
Edinburgh to consider the subject of musical edu
cation in Scotland, with the view of establishing
a society under the above name, the necessary
funds to be supplied by the issue of 20,000 shares
of £i each, and the Society to be incorporated
with limited liability as an association not for
profit. Committees were appointed at Edinburgh,
Glasgow, Dundee, and Aberdeen ; the Duke of
Buccleuch was elected President, Sir Herbert
Oakeley, Vice-President ex-officio, and an influen-
i Abraham Newland was the Chief Cashier of the Bank of England,
and his name was inserted In its notes as the payee.
SCOTTISH MUSICAL SOCIETY.
tial list of Vice-Presidents was announced, in
addition to a Council with the Earl of Eosebery
as chairman. The Society is still (1882) not
sufficiently advanced to begin practical work,
but according to the prospectus, its purpose will
be to promote music in Scotland by maintaining
professional orchestras, conferring scholarships,
organising concerts, and aiding poor musicians
and their families. [W.B.S.]
SCRIBE, EUGENE, the most prolific of French
dramatists, and the best librettist of the iQth
century, born in Paris Dec. 25, 1791. He lost
his parents early, and the well-known advocate
Bonnet urged him to take to the bar, but he was
irresistibly drawn to the stage, and from his
ddbut at 20 at the Theatre du Vaudeville till his
death, he produced for the different theatres of
Paris a rapid succession of pieces which have
served as models to a host of imitators. He
originated the com6die-vaudeville, and attained
to high comedy in ' Une Chaine ' ; but it is in
ope'ra-comique and lyric tragedy that he has
given the most striking proofs of his imagination
and knowledge of the stage. For half a century
he produced on an average 10 pieces a year,
many it is true written conjointly with various
authors, but in these 'mariages d'esprit' Scribe
was always the head of the firm.
We are not concerned here with his novels, nor
with his ope'ras-comiques, further than in saying
that they abound in ingenious surprises, piquant
situations, and scenes admirably adapted for
musical treatment ; it is in lyric tragedy that
his invention, originality, dramatic force, and
genius for the stage, are most conspicuous. As
a writer, especially as a versifier, he was often at
fault, but this defect was overlooked by the com
posers who anxiously secured him for the sake of
his poetical conception. Of his librettos, over 100
in all, only the principal can be specified here: —
SEASONS, THE.
453
Boieldieu
1825
Ope'ra-comique.
Auber
Harold
1827
Opt5ra.
La Muette de Portici . . .
la Belle au bois dormant .
Auber
Harold
Auber
1828
1829
1830
a
it
Op4ra-Comique.
Le Dieu et la Bayadere . . .
Hale'vy
t»
Ope'ra.
Fra Diavolo
Auber
Op£ra-Comique.
1881
Ope'ra.
Robert le Diable
Meyerbeer
Auber
1833
Le Chalet
Ad. Adam
1834
Op^ra-Comique.
Auber
Le Cheval de Bronze . . .
Hal^vy
1835
•«
Ope'ra.
L'Ambassadrice
Auber
1836
Ope'ra-Comique.
Les Huguenots
Meyerbeer
Op6ra.
Le Domino Noir . . .
Auber
1837
Opera-Comique.
Guido et Ginevra . .
Hale'vy
1838
Ope'ra.
Le Lac des Fe'es ....
Auber
1839
Donizetti
1840
Les Diamans de la Couronae
La Part du Piable ....
La SirSne
Auber
tt
1841
1843
1844
Ope'ra-Comique.
tt
Haydee
1847
Meyerbeer
1849
Op4ra.
L'Enfant Prodigue ....
Giralda
Auber
Ad. Adam
1850
tt
Ope"ra.-Comique.
La Tempesta
Hale'vy
Her Majesty's.
L'Etoile du Kord
Meyerbeer
1854
Op^ra-Comique.
Les Vfipres Siciliennes . . .
Verdi
Meyerbeer
1855
1865
Ope'ra.
As will be perceived, his favourite composers
were Meyerbeer and Auber, especially Auber.
Scribe died suddenly in Paris, Feb. 21, 1861.
He had been a member of the French Academy
since 1836, and had acquired a large fortune.
His complete works have not been published, but
there are several editions of his stage-pieces.
That of 1855 comprises 2 vols. of operas, and 3
of ope'ras-comiques, and the latest (Paris, Cal-
mann LeVy, 1874 to 81), 6 vols. I2mo. of ballets
and operas, and 20 of operas-comiques. A perusal
of these gives a high idea of his fertility and
resource. [G.C.]
SCUDO, PIETRO, born June 6, 1806, at Venice,
but brought up in Germany. Some circumstance
led him to Paris, and in 1816 he entered Choron's
school, and studied singing there at the same
time with Duprez. He never became a good
singer, and after taking a secondary part in
Eossini's ' II Viaggio a Eeims ' left the boards,
returned to Choron's school, and there picked up
a slender knowledge of music. After the revolu
tion of 1 830 he played second clarinet in a military
band. Eeturning to Paris he made his way into
society, set up as a teacher of singing, and a com
poser of romances, one of which, 'Le fil de la
Vierge,' was very successful. His knowledge of
harmony and the elementary laws of musical
accent was but slight, as is evident from his songs
' Le Dante,' 'La Baigneuse,' and 'Souvenir';
indeed he himself admits the fact, in spite of his
vanity. Continuing his career as a professor of
singing, he took to writing, and published ' Phy
siologic du rire ' and ' Lea Partis politiques en
province' (1838). He gradually restricted himself
to musical criticism, but as long as he wrote only
for the 'Eevue de Paris,' the 'Ee"forme,' and the
'Eevue inde*pendante,' he was unknown outside
certain cliques in Paris. As musical critic to the
'Eevue des deux Mondes1 he became a man of
mark, though he was never more than a laborious
writer, who made good use of German and Italian
faooks, and managed by means of certain dogmatic
formulae and fine writing to conceal his want
of knowledge and ideas. Scudo's articles are
worth reading as specimens of French musical
criticism before Berlioz was known, and while
Fe"tis occupied the field without a rival. They
have been mostly republished under the fol
lowing titles: — 'Critique et litterature musicale'
(1850, 8vo ; 1852, i2mo), and series (1859,
I2mo); 'La Musique ancienne et moderne'
(1854, I2ino); 'L'Anne'e musicale,' 3 vols.
(Hachette, 1860, 61, and 62), 'La Musique en
1862 ' (Hetzel, 1863), and 'Le Chevalier Sarti'
(1857, i2mo), a musical novel taken from Italian
and German sources, of which a continuation,
' Fre'de'rique,' appeared in the 'Eevue des Deux
Mondes,' but was not republished. All his works
were printed in Paris.
Scudo finally became insane, and died Oct. 14,
1864, in an asylum at Blois. [G.C.]
SEASONS, THE— Die Jahreszeiten— Haydn's
last oratorio. The book was compiled in German
from Thomson's Seasons by Van Swieten, who
induced Haydn to undertake its composition
454
SEASONS.
immediately after the success of the 'Creation';
and the music was written between April 1 798
and April 24, 1801, on which day the first per
formance took place at the Schwarzenberg palace,
Vienna. Haydn always averred that the strain
of writing it had hastened his death. [See vol. i.
7146.]
It is in four parts. The score was published
in 1802-3 (without date) at Vienna ; a barbarous
English version accompanied the German text.
In 1813 Clementi published a vocal score with a
better version. The Rev. John Webb followed
with a further improvement, and more recently,
in 1840 or 41, Professor E. Taylor made a fourth.
A selection from ' Spring ' was given at Birming
ham Festival 1817 ; Spring and Summer at the
same place in 1820. It was on the repertoire of
the Cecilian Society ; and the Sacred Harmonic
Society performed it on Dec. 5, 1851, and four
times more- down to 1877. [G.]
SEBALD, AMALIE. The records of the Sing-
akademie in Berlin contain the names of Frau
von Sebald (geb.Schwadke), alto, 1791, her daugh
ters Amalie, i8or, and Auguste, 1802, soprani.
They appear first as soloists in 1794, 1803,
and 1804 respectively. Amalie is reported to
have had 'an enchantingly beautiful voice.'
C. M. von Weber was in Berlin in 1812. Of all
his acquaintances made there, two, says his son,
were special objects of affection ever afterwards.
One was Lichtenstein ; ' the other was the
youngest of two most amiable, extremely mu
sical sisters, Auguste and Amalie Sebald. For
the second, in the highest degree distinguished
alike for her intellectual and physical charms,
Weber conceived a warm and deep, and, through
the lady's virtues, a highly ennobling affection.'
As Weber in 1812, so Beethoven the year before,
who met her at Toplitz, whither she had come
with the once-famous Countess von der Recke,
whose house in Berlin, the 'Recksche Palais,'
afterwards became the home of the Mendelssohns.
[See vol. ii. p. 2580.] The impressionable com
poser then wrote the following epigram in her
album : —
Ludwig van Beethoven
den Sie, wean Sie auch wollten
doch nicht vergessen sollten.
[Whom even if you would
Forget you never should.]
Toplitz am 8. August 1812.1
He met her there again in Sept. 1812, and a
series of notes to her of that date, published by
Jahn in the 'Grenzboten,' from copies furnished
by the writer of this notice, shows the extraor
dinary impression which she made upon him.2
On May 8, 1816, Beethoven wrote in a letter
to Ries, ' Everything good to your wife ; I, alas,
have none; I have found but one, and her I
never can possess.' On Sept. 16 of the same year,
he said to Giannatasio, that ' he loved unhappily ;
that some five years before he had made the
acquaintance of a person, closer connexion with
whom he should have considered the highest
1 The '1812' was probably added to Beethoven's Autograph, and
should be 1811. He was not at Toplitz on Aug. 8, 1812. (Thayer's Bee
thoven, iii. 215.)
2 These letters, seven in number, are given in Ibid. iii. 212—214.
SECCO RECITATIVE.
happiness of his life. This was not to be thought
of for a moment, almost an utter impossibility, a
chimera. Still, his love was now as strong as on
the first day. Such harmony, he ad4ed, had he
never found before. He had never declared him
self, and yet had not been able to get her out
of his mind.'
It was at this time that Beethoven composed
the cycle of songs 'To the distant loved one.'
Schindler supposed his 'Autumn love' to have
been for a certain Marie Koschak : he is wrong;
Beethoven never saw that lady until after she
had married Dr. Pachler. Amalie Sebald married
the Berlin Justizrath Krause.
AUGUSTE SEBALD married Bishop Kitschel, a
well-known theologian. [A.W.T.]
SECCO RECITATIVE, accurately RECITA-
Tivo SECCO — that is, 'dry' — (also E. parlante;
Germ. Einfache Eecitativ, Sprechende Recitativ;
Fr. Recitatif sans Orcheslre ; Eng. Simple Reci
tative ; Plain Recitative.) The simplest form of
Declamatory Music, unrelieved either by Melody,
or Rhythm, and accompanied only by a Thorough
bass. [See RECITATIVE.]
It was invented at Florence during the closing
years of the i6th century; and first extensively
employed, in the year 1600, in Peri's ' Euridice,'
and Cavaliere's 'La Rappresentazione dell' Anima
e del Corpo.' During the Classical ^Era, it was
used in Opera and Oratorio as the chief exponent
of the Action of the Drama. Rossini first de
parted from the universal custom, boldly ac
companying the whole of the Declamatory Music
in 'Otello' by the full Stringed Band. Spohr
entirely banished the simpler form of Recitative
from the Oratorio, using both Stringed and Wind
Instruments in his Accompaniments, throughout.
Later Composers scorn to use it, even in Opera
Buffa. The change of custom, like all other
progressive movements, has its advantages and
its disadvantages. It increases the interest of
Scenes which, deprived of the resources of
the Orchestra, might become tedious : but it
seriously diminishes the amount of contrast at
tainable in effects of colouring and chiaroscuro,
by depriving the picture of its weaker tones,
and thus confining the possible gradation of
light and shade within much narrower limits
than those which Mozart, Cimarosa, and even
Rossini himself, in his earlier years, turned to
such splendid account. It is true that advanced
Composers endeavour to supply, at the upper end
of the scale of effect, a sufficient number of
gradations to compensate for those they have cut
away from the lower portion of its range : but,
there must be a limit to the addition of Sax
Tubas and Ophicleides; and, were there none, the
contrast between simple Recitative, and even the
lowest form of Orchestral Accompaniment, is in
finitely stronger, in proportion, than that between
the fortissimo of the ordinary Orchestra, and any
amount of extra power that can be added to it.2
In the 1 8th century, Recitative secco was always
accompanied by the Stringed Basses alone, the
Harmonies indicated beneath the Thoroughbass
2 Ses the account of Becitativo Stromentato. p. 85.
SECCO RECITATIVE.
being filled in on the Harpsichord, Pianoforte, or
Organ. As a general rule, these Harmonies were
very simply expressed : but, when relief was
needed, considerable licence was permitted to the
Accompanyist. Such a passage as the following
SECHTER.
455
might therefore have been accompanied, without
any excess of liberty, by the passages indicated
in small notes, provided they were sparingly
introduced, played lightly, and not brought too
prominently forward.
DON GIOVANNI.
LEPORELLO.
DON GIOVANNI.
Oh Le-po-rel-lo
Cbi mlcbiama?
Non co-nos-cl il pa - dron ?
FH
-•-
i
•
I
<4
l- -
i
ri l~
'!•
i
•
»
p
o • <
-•
•
—
— 1
=$-•
•
etc.
When the Harpsichord and the Pianoforte
were banished from the Opera Orchestra, the Ac
companiment of Recitative secco was confided
to the principal Violoncello and Double Bass ; the
former filling in the Harmonies in light Arpeggios,
while the latter confined itself to the simple
notes of the .Basso continue. In this way, the
Recitatives were performed, at Her Majesty's
Theatre, for more than half a century, by
Lindley and Dragonetti, who always played
at the same desk, and accompanied with a per
fection attained by no other Artists in the world,
though Charles Jane Ashley was considered only
second to Lindley in expression and judgment.
The general style of their Accompaniment was
exceedingly simple, consisting only of plain Chords,
played arpeggiando ; but occasionally the two
old friends would launch out into passages as
elaborate as those shown in the following example ;
Dragonetti playing the large notes, and Lindley
the small ones.
DON GIOVANNI.
LEPORELIO.
DON GIOVANNI.
p=g^=^^-S-g-gzt=^
-P-P — g — g g g P-
m. — t _ A P i
i — " £ t-
Per la ma-no essa allo-ra me prende An-co-ra meglio M'acca-rez-za,
j p"p ^ rtji'
-^V (— S - 1 1 - Ci IJ*J 3 >*' * "13
-/• ) J «(k^J' — HJ-^»1 '-1
mi abraccia
^ W '.—• — !
6^
_ -tS^
H-& — J-l
In no country has this peculiar style been so
successfully cultivated as in England ; where the
traditions of its best period are not yet forgotten.
Attempts have lately been made to supersede it,
by filling in the Harmonies on the Pianoforte, or
arranging them for the Band. [W.S.R.]
SECHTER, SIMON. One of the most impor
tant of the modern contrapuntists. Born at
Friedberg, in Bohemia, on Oct. II, 1788. In
1804, after a moderate musical education, he
went to Vienna, where he applied himself with
ardour to theoretical studies. In 1809, while
Vienna was in the hands of the French, he
made the acquaintance of Dragonetti — then living
in concealment under the curious apprehension
that Napoleon would oblige him to go to Paris—
for whom he wrote the pianoforte accompani
ments to his concertos for the double bass. In
1810 Sechter became teacher of the piano and
singing to the Blind Institute, for which he
wrote many songs and two masses. During
the whole of this time he pushed forward his
studies, working more especially at Bach and
Mozart. He found a good friend in Abbe"
Stadler, through whose means three of Sechter's
masses were performed at the court chapel. A
requiem of his, and a chorus from Schiller's
' Bride of Messina ' were also executed in the
Concert Spirituel with success. In 1824 he
became Court-organist, first as subordinate, and
in 1825^ on the death of Worzischeck, as chief,
an office which he retained till his death. His
fame as a theoretical teacher attracted numerous
scholars, amongst others the great Schubert, who
was on the point of taking lessons from him,
when attacked by his last illness. The Emperor
Ferdinand conferred upon him the large gold
medal for a grand mass dedicated to his majesty,
which was shortly followed by the order of
St. Louis from the Duke of Lucca. In 1850 he
became Professor of Composition in the Conser-
vatorjum at Vienna. His Aphorisms, etc., which
he communicated to the Vienna Allg. musik.
Zeitung, show him to have been a profound
thinker, and give many instructive hints both to
teachers and scholars. His most intimate friends
were Staudigl, Lutz, and Holzel, for whom he
wrote a quantity of humorous Volkslieder
456
SECHTER.
in contrapuntal style, as well as many comic
operettas, ballads, etc. His diligence in study
was astonishing. No day passed in which he
did not write a fugue. A few years before his
death he had the misfortune, through his own
good nature, to lose almost everything, and
died on the I2th September, 1867, nearly 80
years old, in poverty and privation. Sechter
was much esteemed and beloved for his sim
plicity and goodness, atvi it may be truly said
that he had no enemies. His system, though
severe, was simple, clear, and logical. His
scholars were almost innumerable : amongst them
may be mentioned, Preyer, Nottebohm, the
Princess Czartorijski, Sucher, Bibl, Rosa Kastner
(Escudier), Rufinatscha, Bruckner, Otto Bach,
Dohler, Schachner, Filtsch, S. Bagge, Benoni,
Vieuxtemps, Pauer, C. F. Pohl, and Thalberg.
Notwithstanding the multitude of his lessons
he found time to compose a great deal of
music. His unpublished works in the Imperial
Library and the Musikverein at Vienna contain
4 oratorios, operas and large cantatas, music for
voice, organ, and pianoforte, including 104
variations on an original theme of 104 bars ;
also a complete theoretical treatise ready for
publication, in two portions, first on acoustics,
second on canon. Among his published works
are an edition of Marpurg on the Fugue, with
many additions ; Grundsatze der musik. Composi
tion (3 vols. B. & H.) ; 12 masses ; Practical ex
amples of accompaniment from figured bass, op.
59 ; Practical school of thorough bass, op. 49, 98;
preludes for the organ, in four books ; fugues,
hymns, chorale preludes ; 4 fugues for PF., op. 5,
dedicated to Beethoven ; fugue in C minor, to the
memory of Schubert, op. 43 ; etc., etc. Sechter
completed the grand fugue for the orchestra in
D major, left imperfect by Mozart. [C.F.P.]
SECOND. The smallest interval in the scale
used for musical purposes. It is described by
notes which are next to each other on the stave,
or by letters which lie next each other in the
alphabet, as A B, B C, C Dfl, Eb Ffl.
(a)
(6)
(')
O"^
-
Three kinds can be practically -distinguished. The
minor second, which is equal to a semitone, as at
(6) in the example ; the major second, which is
equal to a tone, as at (a) ; and the augmented
second, which is equal to three semitones, as at
(c). They are all discords, but are characterised
by different degrees of roughness. The minor
second is extremely harsh, the major decidedly
so, though not so extremely, and the augmented
second but slightly. In ordinary musical usage
the last is actually the same interval as a minor
third, which is not looked upon as a dissonance
at all ; nevertheless the ear, distinguishing rela
tions instinctively, classifies the combinations ac
cording to their context as having a dissonant or
consonant significance. Thus when the context
suggests the interval Ab Bi, the mind will not
accept it as final, but as a dissonance requiring
SEE, THE CONQUERING HERO.
resolution ; whereas if the same interval could
be expressed as Ab Cb, it might be recognised
as a characteristic portion of the minor chord
of Ab, and could be accepted as final without
desire for further motion. — The numerical ratios
of the several intervals in just intonation are given
as follows : — the minor second, 1 6 : 15 ; the grave
major second, 10 : 9 ; the acute major second 9:8;
and the augmented second 75 : 64. [C.H.H.P.]
SECONDO. The second player in a duet.
[See PRIMO.J
SEDIE, DELLE-, ENRICO, baritone singer, son
of Arcangelo Delle-Sedie, merchant of Leghorn,
Italy, born 1826. In the year 1848 he volun
teered in the army of Charles Albert of Pied
mont, and fought against the Austrians in the
war for Italian independence. He was taken
prisoner at the battle of Curtatone but afterwards
released, and at the close of the campaign of
the following year retired from the army with
the rank of lieutenant. Under the direction of
his fellow-citizen, Orazio Galassi, he then devoted
himself to the study of singing, and in 1851 made
his ddbut at Pistoia in Nabucco.
In 1854 he was engaged to perform Rigoletto
at Florence: casting aside the traditional con
ception of Varesi, who had created the rdle at
Venice, he adopted an entirely original render
ing of the character, and at once asserted him
self as an artist of high rank. From that time
his position was secure ; he appeared with un
varying success at Rome, Milan, Vienna, Paris,
and London, and though possessed of so little
voice as to gain the sobriquet of H baritono
senza voce, he made up by dramatic accent and
purity of style for the shortcomings of nature.
In 1867, at the earnest request of Auber, he
accepted a professorship at the Conservatoire
of Paris on the most advantageous terms hitherto
offered. Under him a commission was appointed
for the entire remodelling of that institution,
but the death of Auber, and the outbreak of
the Franco-Prussian war, compelled the govern
ment to abandon their intention. In 1874 he
published a large work upon the art of singing
and musical declamation, under the title of V Art
Lyrique, of which a lengthy critical notice appeared
in the ' Westminster Review' of July 1876.
Signor Delle-Sedie is a Cavaliere of the Order
of the Crown of Italy, for his military services
in the campaigns of 1848, 1849 ; Cavaliere of the
order of SS. Maurizio and Lazzaro ; and member
of many societies and academies both of Italy and
France. He has now retired from the stage,
lives in Paris, and devotes himself entirely to
the teaching of his art. [J.C.G.]
SEE, THE CONQUERING HERO COMES.
A well-known piece of Handel's music. It occurs
in the 3rd act of ' Joshua,' as a welcome to Caleb
after the taking of Debir, in three repetitions of
the same form : (i) Chorus of youths, S.S. A., lines
i and 2 repeated as a horn duet; (2) As a duet
(Signore Cassarini and Galli) with flute accom
paniment; (3)in full chorus. 'Joshua' was finished
Aug. 12, 1747, and produced March 9, 1748-
SEE, THE CONQUERING HERO.
'Judas Maccabeus-' was produced April I, 1747,
and repeated April I, 1747, 'with additions.'
One of the additions was ' See, the conquering
hero,' doubtless on account of the great success
which had greeted it in ' Joshua ' three weeks
before. The air has been often treated as a theme
for variations, and Reinecke has recently com
bined it with the chorale 'Nun danket alle Gott/
in his overture 'Friedensfreier' (1872) at the
conclusion of the Peace between Germany and
France. [G.]
SEGNO, i.e. the sign •$. [See DAL SEGNO.]
SEGUE, 'follows' — as Segue I' aria, ' the aria
follows ' ; a direction frequently found at the end
of recitatives. It is thus equivalent to the more
modern word attacca. It is also found occasion
ally at the foot of a page where a space is left
after one movement in order that the next may
begin at the top, to avoid turning over in the
middle. It then indicates that no stop is to be
made between the two movements. [J.A.F.M.]
SEGULDILLA (sometimes written SIGUI-
DILLA), a popular national dance of Spain. The
origin of both name and dance are uncertain; it
existed in La Mancha in the time of Cervantes
(see Don Quixote, Part II, chap. 38), but there
is no evidence to show whether it is indigenous,
or introduced into Spain by the Moors. It is
however certain that from La Mancha it spread
all over Spain, and it is still danced in both
town and country. Seguidillas are divided into
three kinds— -Seguidillas Manchegas, the original
form of the dance, in which it assumes a gay
and lively character ; Seguidillas Boleras,1 more
measured and stately ; and Seguidillas Gitanas,
danced very slowly and sentimentally. To these
some writers add a fourth kind, the Seguidillas
Taleadas, said to be a combination of the original
tSeguidilla with the Cachucha. The music is
written in 3-4 or 3-8 time, usually in a minor
key, and is performed on the guitar with occa
sionally a flute, violin, or Castanet accompani
ment. The coplas, or words sung by the musicians,
are written in couplets of four short lines followed
by an estrevillo or refrain of three lines, but some
coplas want this latter feature. Both music and
words often partake of the character of an im
provisation, the former remarkable for strange
and sudden modulations, and the latter treating
of both serious and comic subjects. A collection
of coplas was published at the end of the last
century by N. Zamacola, writing under the
pseudonym of Don Precise. .From the intro
duction to this book, the following quaint
description of the Seguidilla is translated : ' So
soon as two young people of the opposite sexes
present themselves standing face to face at a
distance of about two varas2 in the middle of
the- room, the 'ritornelo' or prelude of the music
begins ; then the seguidilla is insinuated by the
voice — if it be a manchega, by singing the first
line of the copla, if it be a bolera, by singing
1 Not to be confounded with the Bolero, said to have been invented
in 1780 by Don Sebastian Zerezo.
2 1 vara =» 34 inches.
SEGUIN.
457
two lines, which must only take up four bars.
The guitar follows, playing a pasacalle ;3 and
at the fourth bar the seguidilla begins to be
sung. Then the dance breaks out with castanets
or crotolas,* running on for a space of nine
bars, with which the first part concludes. The
guitar continues playing the pasacalle, during
which the dancers change to opposite positions
by means of a very deliberate and simple pro
menade (' paseo'). While singing again, at the
beginning of the fourth bar, each goes on for
nine bars more, making the variations and differ
ences of their respective schools, which forms the
second part. Again they change places, and
upon each dancer returning to the spot where
they began to dance, the third part goes on in
the same way as the second, and on arriving at
the ninth bar, the voice, the instrument, and the
castanets cease all at once, and as if impromptu,
the room remaining in silence, and the dancers
standing immovable in various beautiful attitudes,
which is what we call "well stopped" (Bien
parado).' Space will not allow us to give an
example of the music which accompanies this
beautiful dance. In Book IV. of Luigi Borghi's
'Opera Dances' (London, 1783) is a seguidilla
modified for theatrical representation, and in the
First Act of ' Carmen ' there is a Spanish air
which Bizet has entitled 'Seguidille.' Better
examples than these will be found in Mendel's
Lexicon (sub voce Seguidilla), and in the Ap
pendix to Part I. of Mariano Soriano Fuertes's
' Historia de la Musica Espanola ' (Madrid, 1 855-
1859), in which specimens are given of the
varieties of the dance. With regard to the
words, the following copla (from Don Preciso's
'Colleccion de Coplas,' Madrid, 1799) may serve
as an example :
El I/unes me enamoro,
MSrtes lo digo.
Mie"rcoles me declare,
Jfieves consigo :
Vi^rnes doy zelos
Y Sahado y Domingo
Busco Amor nuevo.5 fW.B.S.l
SEGUIN, ARTHUR EDWARD SHELDEN, com
monly known as EDWABD, was born in London,
April 7, 1809. He received his musical education
at the Royal Academy of Music, and first ap
peared in public in 1828 at concerts and perform
ances of Italian operas given by its pupils.
His voice was a deep bass, of very extensive
compass, and he met with a very favourable re
ception. In 1829 he sang at Exeter Festival.
In 1831 he appeared at the theatre in Tottenham
Street as Polyphemus in Handel's 'Acis and
Galatea.' In 1832 he sang at the Concert of
Ancient Music. In 1833 and 1834 ne was en'
gaged at Covent Garden, and in the latter year
appeared at the King's Theatre as II Conte
Robinson in Cimarosa's 'Matrimonio Segreto,'
and also sang at the Festival in Westminster
3 Literally 'street-pass'; any popular street-song. See PASSA-
CAOLIO, vol. ii. p. 661 a.
4 A kind of Castanet.
5 Translation :— ' On Monday I fall in love, on Tuesday I fay so,
Wednesday I declare myself, Thursday I succeed : Friday I cause
Jealousy, and Saturday and Sunday I seek a fresh love.'
458
SEGUTN.
Abbey. From 1835 to 1837 he was engaged at
Drury Lane. In August 1838 he appeared at
the English Opera House in Macfarren's 'Devil's
Opera,' and soon afterwards quitted England
for America, made his first appearance at the
National Theatre, New York, as the Count
in Rooke's ' Amilie ' on Oct. 15, 1838, and was
extremely well received. He afterwards formed
an opera company named ' The Seguin Troupe,'
who performed at various places in the United
States and Canada. Amongst other distinctions
he was elected a chief by one of the Indian tribes,
and received an Indian name, signifying 'The
man with the deep mellow voice ' ; an honour
which had never before been conferred on any
Englishman, except Edmund Kean, the tragedian.
He died at New York, Dec. 9, 1852.
His wife, ANN CHILDE, was also a pupil of the
Royal Academy of Music, and appeared in public
as a soprano singer in 1828 in the same perform
ances as her future husband, and with equal
success. In 1832 she sang at the Concert of
Ancient Music, and in 1834 at the Westminster
Abbey Festival. After performing for two or
three seasons at the King's Theatre as ' seconda
donna,' she appeared on the English stage at
Drury Lane, Nov. 3, 1837, as Donna Anna in
the English version of Mozart's ' Don Giovanni.'
She accompanied her husband to America and
performed in opera until his death, when she
retired from the stage and taught music in New
York, where she was residing in 1880.
His younger brother, WILLIAM HENRY SEGUIN,
born 1814, also a pupil of the Royal Academy
of Music, possessed a light bass voice and was a
concert singer and member of the choir of the
Temple Church. He died Dec. 28, 1850. He
married Miss GOOCH, soprano singer, a fellow
pupil at the Academy, who survived him a few
years only. [W.H.H.]
SEHNSUCHT ('longing' or * yearning '—an
untranslatable word).
Nur wer die Sehnaucht kennt
Weiss was ich fuhle>
is one of the Songs of Mignon in Goethe's
Wilhelm Meister, which has been specially at
tractive to two great composers. Beethoven
composed it four times for voice and PF. — three
times in G minor, once in Eb major — and the four
were published Sept. 22, 1810, at Vienna. Schu
bert set the words four times — twice as a solo
song for soprano (op. 62, no. 4, and 40 Lieder,
no. 13) ; as a duet for Mignon and the Harper
(op. 62, no. i) ; and as a quintet for men's
voices. Goethe wrote another ' Sehnsucht' ('Was
zieht mir das Herz so ?' Schubert, Lf. 37, 2) ; and
eongs with the same title are found in the works
of Schiller (<Ach aus dieses Thales grunden,'
Schubert, op. 39), Mayrhofer (' Der Lerche wol-
kennahe/ Schubert, op. 8, 2), and Seidl ('Die
Schiebe freiert,' Schubert, op. 105, 4).
The so-called Sehnsucht-walzer, known also as
' Le Desir,' often attributed to Beethoven, was
compiled from a ' Trauer-walzer ' composed by
Schubert in 1816, and published Nov. 29, 1821,
SEMELE.
as no. 2 of 'Original Tanze,' op. 9, and from
Himmel's ' Favorit-walzer' ; and was published
under Beethoven's name by Schotts in 1826. [G.]
SEMBRICH, MARZELLA, born 1858 at Lem-
berg, Galicia, was taught music by her father,
and played in public both piano and violin at the
age of twelve ; she afterwards received further
instruction on these instruments from Stengel
(to whom she is now married), and Bruckmann,
both professors at Lemberg. She then went to
Vienna, for completion of her studies under Liszt,
but discovering herself to be the possessor of a
fine voice, determined to attempt a vocal career,
and for that purpose studied singing at Milan
under Lamperti the younger (at present professor
at the Conservator! urn, Dresden). On June 3,
1 877> Sne niade her debut at Athens as Elvira in
'I Puritani,' and was highly successful there for
two months in that, and as Lucia and Dinorah.
She returned to Vienna,, studied the German
repertoire under Professor Levy, and in Oct.
1878 made a highly successful d6but at Dresden
as Lucia. She remained there until the spring
of 1880, becoming well known for her perform
ances of Zerlina, Susanna, and Constance, of
Mozart, the heroines in Flotow's Martha and
Stradella, of Gilda, Amina, etc. She sang at the
Lower Rhine Musical Festival of 1880 ; and
June 12 of the same year made her first appear
ance in England at the Royal Italian Opera as
Lucia, and was greatly successful in that, Amina,
and Margaret of Valois, She returned there for
the seasons 1881-82, playing for the first time in
England Dinorah, and Constance in the revival of
Mozart's 'Entfiihrung.' She has also sinig at
Milan, Vienna, Warsaw, St. Petersburg, Moscow,
etc., and during her engagements abroad has oc
casionally played with great success in the two
fold capacity of pianist and violinist. Madame
Sembrich's voice is about 2.| octaves in compass,
viz. from the lower C to F in alt, and is very
brilliant in the upper register ; she also possesses
considerable powers of execution. [A.C.]
SEMELE, a secular oratorio by Handel, was
composed in 1743, between June 3 and July 4.
The libretto is slightly altered from an opera-
book of Congreve's, written in 1707. 'Semele'
is termed by Arnold 'A Dramatic Perform
ance,' by Mainwaring 'An English opera but
called an Oratorio,' while it was announced at
different times in the 'General Advertiser' as
'Semele, after the manner of an Opera,' and
' Semele, after the manner of an Oratorio.' The
first performance took place on Feb. 10, 1744.
at Covent Garden Theatre, where it was re
peated three times in the same year. In the
following December it was performed twice, with
additions and alterations, at the King's Theatre,
Haymarket, and was revived by Smith and
Stanley in 1762. The Cambridge University
Musical Society revived it on November 27,
1878. The original MS. is in Buckingham
Palace, but there are some interesting sketches
(principally of Act iii.) in the FitzwilHam
Museum at Cambridge. [W.B.S.]
SEMET.
SEMET, THEOPHILE, born at Lille, Sept. 6,
1824. The prizes for the cello and harmony
which he gained at the local Conservatoire pro
cured him a grant from the municipality to study
iu Paris, and he entered Hale'vy's class for com
position, but left without obtaining a prize, in
order to take to teaching. He was, however, a
thorough artist, and his vein of original melody
and refined harmony soon made him known.
His first work was merely a few songs and some
charming orchestral music for 'La petite Fadette,'
vaudeville in 2 acts (Varie'te's, Dec. 28, 1850),
but he at length procured, through his fellow-
pupil Carvalho, a better opportunity, and his
'Nuits d'Espagne,' 2 acts (May 26), and 'La
Demoiselle d'honneur/ 3 acts (Dec. 30), were
both produced in 1857 with success at the Theatre
Lyrique; 'Gil Bias' (March 26, 1860), an ope'ra-
comique in 5 acts, and 'Ondine,' 3 acts (Jan. 7,
1863) — the former his most popular piece — fol
lowed at the same theatre, but his next work,
'La petite Fadette' (Sept. n, 1869), libretto by
Carre" (he was evidently a great admirer of
Georges Sand), was produced at the Ope'ra
Comique. In this work — revived at Lille, April
iSSi, with enthusiastic applause— there is much
colour and expression, and great charm, indeed
all Semet's works contain real gems of melody
and harmony. Their drawback is their difficulty.
Besides his operas he composed songs for a piece
called 'Constantinople' (1854); melodies ; a can
tata (performed at the Opera, Aug. 15, 1862) ; airs
de ballet for 'Les Pirates dela Savane' (1867), and
many part-songs, some of which, especially ' La
Danse des Sylphes,' are remarkable.
M. Semet, who has for many years played the
drums at the Ope'ra, has brought out no new
work since 1870. In common with many other
composers lie is looking forward to the revival
of a third Theatre Lyrique in Paris, and in the
meantime lives in retirement at Cre'teil. [G.C.]
SEMIBREVE (Lat. Semibrevis ; Ital. Semi-
Ireve; Fr. Ronde; Germ. Taktnote, Game Note}.
Franco of Cologne, the earliest known writer
on Measured Music (Cant us mensurabilis) who
furnishes the types from which the forms of
our modern Notation are evidently derived, de
scribes notes of four different kinds — the Double
Long (or Large), the Long, the Breve, and the
Semibreve — which last was, in, his day, the
shortest note in use, though no very long time
elapsed before the Minim was added to the list.
The forms of these notes are generally supposed
to have been suggested by those of the Neumae
of an earlier period ; the Large and Long being
clearly traceable to the Virga ; and the Breve
and Semibreve to the Punctus.1 Don Nicola
Vicentino, however, in his ' L'antica Musica
ridotta alia moderna Prattica,' printed at Rome
") T555. refers the forms of all these notes to a
different origin ; deriving the Large, the Long,
and the Breve, from the B quadratum, or Square
B, (t} ) ; and the Semibreve, from the B rotundum
(5); the transformation being effected, in each
1 See vol. ii. p. 471 a.
SEMIBREYE.
459
case, by depriving the figure of one or both its
tails. But Vicentino has fallen into so many
palpable errors that we cannot trust him : and,
in the present instance, his theory certainly does
not accord with that early form of the Semi
breve which is produced by cutting the Breve (u)
in half, diagonally, thus, (r). This form soon
gave way to the Lozenge (* or <>), which was
retained in use until late in the 1 7th century,
when it was replaced, in Measured Music, by the
round note of our present system (o), though
in Gros fa — the Gregorian system of Notation
which represents the Black Letter of Music — the
Lozenge remains in use to the present day.
Until the beginning of the I7th century, the
Semibreve represented one third of a Perfect
Breve, and the half of an Imperfect one. In the
Greater Prolation, it was equal to three Minims ;
in the Lesser, to two. In either case, it was ac
cepted as the norm of all other Notes ; and was
held to constitute a complete Measure, or Stroke.
In the Greater Prolation — or, as we should now
call it, Triple Time — this Stroke was indicated
by a single down-beat of the hand, representing
what we write as a dotted Semibreve. In the
Lesser Prolation — the Common Time of the
modern system — it was indicated by a down
and an up beat, called respectively the Thesis
and the Arsis of the Measure. It will be under
stood, that these two beats represented two
Minims ; and, happily for us, we are not left
altogether in doubt as to the average pace at
which these two Minims were sung, in the great
Polyphonic Compositions of the i^th and i6fch
centuries : for, apart from the traditions of the
Sistine Chapel, early writers have left a very
definite rule for our guidance. The Thesis and
Arsis of the Lesser Prolation, they say, represent
the beats of the human pulse. Now, the rapidity
of the human pulse, taking into calculation the
variations exhibited at all ages, and in both
sexes, ranges between 66'7 and 140 per minute:2
allowing, therefore, for roughness of calculation,
we may say that the Compositions of Josquin
des Pr£s, and Palestrina, may be safely inter
preted between £? = 60, and<cJ = 1 40 — a sufficiently
extended range, surely, to satisfy the individual
taste of the most exigeant Conductor.
In Modern Music, the Semibreve retains more
than one of the characteristics that distinguished
it in the I5th and i6th centuries. It is now,
indeed, the longest instead of the shortest note
in common use, for the employment of the
Breve is altogether exceptional: but it is none
the less the norm from which all other notes are
derived. To this day we teach our children to
say ' A Semibreve is equal to two Minims, four
Crotchets,' and so on, to the end of the Time-
Table. Again, in our Alia, breve Time, (<£), it
is divided into two Minims, represented by an
up and down beat, exactly as in the Lesser Pro
lation, as described by Morley and other early
writers. More frequently we divide it into four
Crotchet-beats, (C), but this does not alter its
2 See ' Carpenter's Human Physiology ' (Load. 1881), pp. ?00 et seq.
460
SEMIBREVE.
character as a normal type ; and indeed it was
frequently so divided, in the i6th century, in
the works of the great Madrigal writers. We
may therefore say that, of all the notes now in
use, the Semibreve is the one which unites us
most closely to the system of those who invented
the germ of the method we ourselves follow ;
and it furnishes the safest guide we know of to
the right understanding of their works. [W.S.R.]
SEMICHORUS, i.e. Half chorus; a word
used to denote a kind of antiphonal effect pro
duced by employing half the number of voices at
certain points, and contrasting this smaller body
of sound with the full chorus. [J.A.F.M.]
SEMICROMA (Lat. Semichroma ; Eng.
Quaver, or Semiquaver). The Italian name for
the Semiquaver. Old writers, however, some
times apply the term Croma to the Crotchet,
and Semicroma to the Quaver ; and, so vague
was once the distinction between the two, that
even Baretti, writing as late as 1824, makes the
word 'Croma' signify 'a Crotchet or Quaver.'
The etymology of the word Chroma is derived
from the very early custom of using red notes
intermixed with black ones. The red notes being
sung more quickly than the black ones, the dura-
tion of a red Minim was a little longer than that
of a black Semiminim (or Crotchet) ; and the note
was called Chroma on account of its colour. [See
SEMIQUAVER, SEMIFUSA, SEMIMINIMA, QUAVER,
NOTATION.] [W.S.R.]
SEMIFUSA. The Latin name for the Semi
quaver ; but sometimes applied to the Quaver
also. The etymology of the term is not very
clear. The most probable theory is that which
traces it to a fancied resemblance between the
early form of the Quaver, and that of a spindle
(fusus). [See SEMICROMA, SEMIQUAVER, SEMI-
MINIMA, QUAVER, NOTATION.] [W.S.R.]
SEMIMINIMA MAJOR and MINOR (Eng.
Greater, and Lesser Half- Minim = Crotchet, and
Quaver ; Ital. Croma e Semicroma ; Germ.
Viertel und Achtel ; French Noire et Croche).
Though the Minim was BO called, because, at
the time of its invention, it was the smallest
(i. e. the shortest) of all notes, Composers soon
found it convenient to divide it in half, and even
into four parts. Franchinus Gafurius, quoting
from Prosdocimns de Beldemandis, describes and
figures these divisions in his ' Practica Musicae,'
printed in 1496. The Greater Semiminima, the
equivalent of the modern Crotchet, was a black
lozenge-headed note, with a tail, 4 ; the Lesser
Semiminima, now called the Quaver, was a
P
similar note, with a single hook, 4.. Sometimes
the head of the greater Semiminim was ' void'-
that is to say, open, or white — in which case,
this note also had a hook, to distinguish it from
o
the Minim, <> ; and, when this hooked form was
used, the figure which we have described above
as proper to the Greater Semiminim, was used
for the Lesser one. When black and red notes
were used together, the red Minim served as the
SEMITONE.
diminutive of the black one ; and the Semiminiin
was called Chroma, on account of its colour.
This name was afterwards applied both to the
Greater and the Lesser Semiminim ; and hence
it came to pass that, in later times, the term
Chroma was applied indiscriminately to the
Crotchet and the Quaver. [See SEMICHROMA,
NOTATION.] [W.S.B.]
SEMIQUAVER, (Lat. Semifusa-, Ital. Semi-
aroma, Biscroma, Semifusa; Germ. Sechzehntd,
Sechzehntheil-Note ; Fr. Double crocke). The
sixteenth part of a Semibreve.
The earliest mention of the Semiquaver occurs
in the 'Practica Musicae' of Franchinus Gafurius,
printed at Milan in 1496. It may be found —
though very rarely — in the printed Polyphonic
Music of the i6th century, in the form of a black
3 R
lozenge-headed note, with a double hook, 4 or £ ;
and it is manifestly from this early type that our
present figure is derived. In the i6th century both
Semiquavers and Quavers were always printed
with separate hooks. The custom of joining
Quavers together by a single line, and Semi
quavers by a double one, dates from the lyth
century ; and the credit of the invention is
generally accorded to John Play ford. Hawkins
gives the year 1660 as 'about' the date of
Playford's improvement; and tells us that the
new method was first copied by the Dutch, then
by the French, and afterwards by the Germans ;
but quotes the folio edition of Marcello's Psalms
(Venice, 1724) as a proof that the Italians ad
hered to the old plan until late in the i8th
century — as did also the Spaniards.1 Long before
that time, the custom of grouping Semiquavers
after the modern manner was in constant use in
England (except — as now — in cases in which a
separate syllable was sung to each note), as may
be seen in the early printed editions of Purcell's
' Te Deum,' and other similar works, in which may
also be noticed the substitution of the roundhead
for the earlier lozenge. [See SEMICROMA, SEMIFUSA,
SEMIMINIMA, QUAVER, NOTATION.] [W.S.R.]
SEMITONE (from the Greek ^ur<W). Half
a tone ; the smallest interval in the ordinary
musical scales. The semitone may be of different
kinds, each of which has a different theoretical
magnitude.
Since the invention of the diatonic scale the
natural interval of the fourth has been subdivided
artificially into two tones and a semitone. In the
ancient Greek time the two tones were both what
are now called major tones, and the hemitone
had a magnitude determined by the difference be
tween their sum and the fourth : but when har
mony began to prevail, one of the tones was
diminished to a minor tone, and this gave the
modern semitone a little greater value. The
semitone, so formed, as belonging to the diatonic
scale (from B to C, or from E to F for example)
is called a diatonic semitone.
The introduction of chromatic notes gave rise
to a third kind of semitone, as from C to Cff or
1 Hawkins, Hist. vol. iv. bk. iii. ch. 5, note.
SEMITONE.
from G to Gb ; this is called a chromatic semi
tone and has a less magnitude than the diatonic
one.
Finally came the great simplification of music
by dividing the octave into twelve equal intervals,
each of which was called a mean semitone ; thus
abolishing practically the difference between the
diatonic and the chromatic values. A semitone
may now be considered, in practical music, as
simply the interval between the sounds given by
any two adjoining keys on a well-tuned piano.
The relations between the theoretical magni
tudes of the different kinds of semitones are
about as follows: — If we represent the magnitude
of a mean semitone by 25, the true magnitude of
a diatonic semitone will be about 28; of a chro
matic semitone about 18; and of the ancient
Greek hemitone about 23. [W.P.]
SEMIRAMIDE (i. e. Semiramis, Empress of
Nineveh). A favourite subject with Italian
writers of operas. Librettos upon it were written
by Moniglia, Apostolo Zeno, and Silvani ; and
Clement's Dictionnaire Lyrique contains a list of
21 operas composed to one or other of these by
the masters of the eighteenth century. Voltaire's
play on the same subject was also adapted to music
and set by Graun (Berlin, 1 754), and Catel (1802).
Rossini's well-known chef-d'oeuvre was written to
a libretto by Rossi, and produced at Venice Feb. 3,
1823; and in London, at the King's Theatre,
July 15, 1824. In French, as 'Semiramis,' it
appeared in Paris July 9, 1860. — SEMIRAMIDE
RICONOSCIDTA, words by Metastasio, was set
by Vinci, Porpora, Cocchi, Sarti, Traetta, Meyer
beer, and Gluck — the last of these at Vienna
in 1748. It is important as revealing some of
the qualities by which Gluck has been rendered
immortal. [G.]
SEMLER, FRANZ XAVER, a viola-player of
some renown in Berlin, the last to use the viola
as a solo instrument. He was born in 1772, and
lasted down to Feb. 27, 1857. His sister Sophie
(afterwards Frau Neilas) in 1 784 made a great
hit as Constanze in the ' Entfti.hr ung.' Mozart
visited her in 17*9 at Potsdam, and her brother
tells a charming little story, for which his name
is worth preserving. ' Mozart was asked to ex
temporise, and, as usual, was willing enough. He
sat down to the piano, and asked the company
for two themes. My sister stood close by to
watch his playing. Mozart, always full of his fun,
looked up at her and said, " Come, haven't you
too got a bit of a subject for me ?" (Habens auch
a Themerl aufen Gewissen). She hummed one ;
on which he began in his own charming style,
toying first with one and then with the others,
and at last bringing in all three together to the
delight of everybody.' (Otto Jahn, ii. 411, from
Semler's own account.) [G.]
SEMPLICE, 'simple'; a direction denoting
that the passage so marked is to be performed
without any adornment or deviation from the
time, used particularly in passages of which the
character might possibly be misunderstood. A
curious instance occurs in Chopin's Rondo for
SENESINO.
461
two pianos, op. 73> where the second subject
(in A minor) is inscribed ' Semplice senza orna-
menti.' The lovely Arietta which forms the sub
ject of the variations in Beethoven's last PF.
Sonata, op. 1 1 1 , is marked 'Adagio molto semplice
cantabile.' [J.A.F.M.]
SEMPRE, 'always'; a word used in conjunc
tion with some other mark of time or expression
to signify that such mark is to remain in force
until a new direction appears. Its purpose is to
remind the performer of the directions which
might otherwise be forgotten — as in the scherzo
of the Eroica Symphony, where the direction
Semprepp. e staccato is repeated again and again
throughout the movement. [J.A.F.M.]
SENESINO, FRANCESCO BERNARDI DETTO,
i. e. ' F. B. called the Sienese,' one of the most
famous of the sopranist singers who flourished
in the last century. He was born about 1680, at
Siena (whence he derived his name), and received
his musical education from Bernacchi, at Bologna.
Little or nothing is heard of his career previous
to 1719. At that time he was singing at the
Court theatre of Saxony, and when Handel came
to Dresden, in quest of singers, was engaged by
him for London.
Senesino's first appearance in this country
(Nov. 1720) was in Buononcini's opera ' Astarto,'
which at once established him in public favour
as a singer of the first rank. He sang next in a
revival of Handel's ' Floridante,' and in the cele
brated ' Muzio Scaevola ' ; afterwards in Handel's
'Ottone,' 'Flavio,' and 'Giulio Cesare' (1723),
'Tamerlano' (1724), 'Rodelinda' (1725), 'Scipio'
and 'Alessandro' (1726), and in various operas
and pasticcios by other composers. In ' Giulio
Cesare' his declamation of the famous accom
panied recitative 'Alma del gran Pompeo' created
a special sensation. A writer in the London
Magazine (Feb. 1733) relates an amusing anec
dote of Senesino in this opera: 'When I was
last at the opera of Julius Caesar, a piece of the
machinery tumbled down from the roof of the
theatre upon the stage, just as Senesino had
chanted forth these words "Cesare non seppe
mai che sia timore" — Csesar never knew fear.
The poor hero was so frightened that he trem
bled, lost his voice, and fell crying. Every
tyrant or tyrannical minister is just such a Csesar
as Senesino.' In the opera 'Alessandro' it is
said that when, in the part of Alexander, he led
his soldiers to the assault of Ossidraca, he so far
forgot himself in the heat of combat as to stick
his sword into one of the pasteboard stones of
the wall of the town, and bear it in triumph
before him as he entered the breach ! This
opera had a run of two months, and its last per
formance, advertised for June 7, was prevented
by the sudden illness of Senesino, who, as soon
as he was able to travel, set off for Italy, for the
recovery of his health, promising to return the
next winter. This promise, however, was not
kept in time to enable the Opera-house to open
till after Christmas, a fact alluded to in the fol
lowing prologue, spoken by Mrs. Younger at
462
SENESINO.
the revival of 'Camilla' (performed entirely in
English), Nov. 26, 1726:
Ye British fair, vouchsafe us your applause,
And smile, propitious, on our English cause;
"While Senesino you expect in vain,
And see your favours treated with disdain:
"While, 'twixt his rival queens, such mutual hate
Threats hourly ruin to your tuneful state,
Permit your country's voices to repair,
In some degree, your disappointment there:
Here may that charming circle nightly shine,
'Tis time, when that deserts us, to resign.
Senesino reappeared in Handel's 'Admeto,'
early in 1727. This was followed in the same
year by 'Riccardo imo,' and in 1728 by 'Siroe'
and ' Tolomeo,' in which a great effect was made
by the echo song, 'Dite che fa,' sung by Cuzzoni,
with many of the passages repeated behind the
scenes by Senesino. But now, after several un-
prosperous seasons, the society oalled the Royal
Academy, for which Handel had directed the
operas at the Haymarket, was dissolved ; the
theatre was forced to close its doors for lack of
support, and the Italian singers dispersed over
the Continent. Hawkins attributes to this time
the quarrel which ended in a final rupture be
tween Senesino and the great composer. But
this is disproved by the fact that Senesino re
turned to sing for Handel in 1 730. That there
was however much discord in the company before
it separated is true enough. The quarrels between
the two 'rival queens' dated from the beginning
of their engagement, and Senesino, whose temper
was arrogant and imperious, and who was the
spoiled child of the fashionable world and of the
public, exerted no appeasing influence. Quantz
relates in his memoirs, that Senesino's quarrels
brought about the dissolution of the Dresden
company in 1719. It is said by Burney (who
quotes it from Walpole) that once, at a rehearsal
in London, he offended Mrs. Anastasia Robinson
(afterwards Countess of Peterborough) so griev
ously, that Lord Peterborough 'publicly and
violently' caned him behind the scenes. Handel's
own disposition was not conciliatory, and 'he
suspected that Senesino's example had given
encouragement to that refractory spirit which
he found rising in the two contending females'
(Hawkins).
After an absence of nearly three years, how
ever, Senesino rejoined the Haymarket company,
under Handel's management, at a salary of 1400
guineas, and appeared on Feb. 2, 1731, in 'Poro,'
then considered a great success. In the same
year were revived ' Rodelinda ' and ' Rinaldo.'
'Ezio' and 'Sosarme' were produced in 1732.
Besides singing in all these, Senesino took part
(May 2, 1732) in 'Esther,' Handel's first ora
torio, described as ' a new species of exhibition,
at the Opera-house,' and on June 10, in a curious
performance, under the composer's own direction,
of 'Acis and Galatea.' Several airs and three
choruses were interpolated on this occasion, from
Handel's early Neapolitan Serenata on the same
subject, and the piece was sung partly in English
and partly in Italian.
The last of Handel's operas in which Senesino
appeared, was 'Orlando' (Jan. 1733), but he
SENFF.
took part later in the same season in 'Deborah '
described then as an opera, and performed (as
was 'Esther') on opera nights. The long im
pending quarrel now came to a crisis. Handel
could not brook the opposition to his will of a
singer, however eminent or idolized by the
public, and, in the end, their engagement was
broken off. The composer was regarded with
no very friendly eye by the English aristocracy,
many of whom were alienated by his rough inde
pendence and want of respect of persons. 'All
these wealthy adversaries of Handel naturally
espoused the cause of Senesino from the outset
and ended by demanding that Senesino should be
retained . . . Handel replied that Senesino should
never reappear im his theatre.' (Schoelcher. )
Accordingly, says Burney, 'the nobility and
gentry opened a subscription for Italian operas
at Lincoln's Inn Fields, inviting Porpora thither
to compose and conduct, and engaging Senesino,
Cuzzoni, Montagnana, Segatti, Bertolli, and after
wards Farinelli, to perform there.' There Sene
sino remained till 1735, when he returned to
Siena, with a fortune of £15,000, and built him
self a house.
Senesino's voice was a mezzo soprano, or, ac
cording to some, a contralto. Although limited
in compass it was considered by many good judges
to be superior in quality even to that of Farinelli.
It was clear, penetrating, and flexible, his in
tonation faultless, his shake perfect. Purity,
simplicity, and expressiveness were the charac
teristics of his style, while for the delivery of
recitative 'he had not his fellow in Europe.'
To judge from his portraits, the expression
of his countenance is both arrogant and coarse.
Hawkins says that he was a graceful -actor, but
one would hardly suppose it, judging from his
representation in Bickham's Musical Entertainer
(T 737)> entitled ' The Ladies' Lament for the loss
of Senesino.' The engraving represents him as
a giant, clothed like a Roman emperor, -with
women kissing the hem of his coat of mail, and
some weeping. On the other side are heaps of
bags of gold, being carried by porters towards
the frigate on which he is about to embark.
In 1739 Senesino was living at Florence, and
sang a duet with the Archduchess Maria Theresa
there. He died about 1750. [F.A.M.]
SENFF, BARTHOLF, an eminent German music-
publisher, was born at Friedrichshall, Coburg,
Sept. 2, 1818. He founded the house which bears
his name, in Leipzig, in 1850, and his catalogue
contains original editions of Mendelssohn (ops.
104, 109, and 2 Clavierstiicke), Schumann (ops.
82,106, 11,7, 122,134), Brahms (°PS- 5> 6, Gavotte
by Gluck, 5 Studien fiir PF.), Gade, Hiller,
Reinecke, Rietz, Rubinstein (ops. 8, 42, 48, 51,
52, 54. 57. 59> 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 70, 72,
73-78' 80, 84, 86, 87-92, 94-102, 106, 107,
'Der Damon,' 'Feramors,' ' Kalaschnikoff,' 'Die
Kinder der Haide,' 'Nero,' etc.), and other
masters. Also valuable republications, such as
Pauer's 'Alte Claviermusik,' David's ' Concert-
studien ' for the violin, Clauss-Szarvady's ' Cla
vierstiicke'; and especially an edition of Schubert's
SENFF.
song3 in 20 volumes, edited by Julius Rietz.
[See vol. iii. p. 356 &, 371 a.] Of Schubert he
has further published Lachner's orchestration of
4 Miriam/ a movement of a Quartet in C minor
dating from 1820, etc., etc. Also the excellent
educational works of Louis Kohler (ops. 47, 50,
79, 112, 128, 150, 151, 152, 175, 190, 270, 280).
Senff is the editor and proprietor of the well-
known musical periodical ' Signale fur die musik-
alische Welt.' [See SIGNALE.] [G.]
SENFL or SENFEL, LUDWIG, born at Basel
or Basel Augst (Basle) towards the end of the 1 5th
century. A volume of MS. songs in the Vienna
library contains some verses, written and set to
music by Senfl himself, describing his early enthu
siasm for music, his education under Heinrich
Isaac, and his gratitude to that master. At an
early age he entered the Court chapel of Maxi
milian I., ultimately succeeded Isaac as chapel-
master, and held that office till the emperor's
death (Jan. 1519), on which occasion he wrote
music to the words ' Quis dabit oculis nostris
fontem lacrimarum.' In 15 20 he was at Augsburg,
received a present of 50 gulden from Charles V.
on Feb. 19, and in the following November per
sonally edited the ' Liber selectarum Cantionum,"
one of the first music books printed in Germany.
Thence he went to Munich, though in what
capacity is uncertain. On one title-page (1526)
he is called ' Musicus intonator,' on another (1534)
'Musicus primarius,' of the duke of Bavaria,
while in his own letters he subscribes himself
simply ' Componist zu Miinchen.' The date of
his death is unknown. In Forster's collection
of Liedlein (preface dated Jan. 31, 1556) he is
spoken of as ' L. S. seliger' (i.e. dead); and if
the title ' musicus primarius ' stands for ' chapel-
master ' he must have died or retired some years
before, since Ludwig Daser had held that office
for some years when Lassus went to Munich in
1557-
The well-known letter from Luther to Senfl l
is no evidence that the composer had worked
specially for the Reformed Church, though the
existence of the correspondence has given rise to
that idea. Indeed his connection with the strictly
Catholic court of Munich would, as Fe"tis points
out, render it most improbable.2 Four letters
written by Senfl to the Margrave Albrecht of
Brandenburg and to Georg Schultheis are printed
in the 'Allgemeine Musik. Zeitung' for Aug. 12,
1863.
A portrait engraved on a medal by Hagenauer
of Augsburg, with the inscription 'Ludovvicus
Senfel,' and on the reverse ' Psallana deo meo
quamdiu fuero 1529,' is in the collection of coins
and medals at Vienna.
The royal library at Munich contains the
manuscript church service books begun by Isaac
and completed by Senfl, as well as manuscript
masses by the latter. His most important pub
lished works are (i) ' Quinque salutationes D. N.
Hiesu Christi,' etc. (Norimbergae 1526); (2)'Varia
1 Dated Coburg, Oct. 4, 1530. The letter is printed in 'Dr. M.
Luther's Gedanken fiber die Musik,' F. A. Beck (Berlin 1828), p. 58.
1 ' Biographic des Musicieus,' vl. 44.
SEPTET.
463
carminum genera, quibus turn Horatius, turn alii
egregiae poetae harmoniis composita' (id.
J534); (3) 'I21 newe Lieder' (id. 1534), with
81 nos. by L. S. ; (4) ' Magnificat octo tonorum,
a 4' (id. 1537); (5) '115 guter newer Liedlein'
(id. 1544), with 64 nos. by L. S. Besides these
Eitner3 names above 100 separate pieces printed
in various collections of the i6th century. In
modern notation 9 sacred pieces (a 4) are given
by Winterfeld in 'Der evangelische Kirchen-
gesang' (Leipsic 1843), and 5 Lieder by Liliencron
in ' Die historischen Volkslieder der Deutschen'
(Leipzig 1 865-69). ( J. R. S.-B.]
SENNET — also written SENET, SENNATE,
SYNNET, CYNET, SIGNET or SIGNATE — a word
which occurs in stage-directions in the plays of
the Elizabethan dramatists, and is used to denote
that a particular fanfare is to be played. It is
a technical term, and what particular notes were
played is now unknown. A Sennet was dis
tinguished from a Flourish, as is proved by
a stage-direction in Dekker's ' Satiromastix,'
' Trumpets sound a florish, and then a
sennate.' (Nares' Glossary.) [W.B.S.]
SENZA, 'without' — as Senza organo, 'with
out organ ' ; a direction of frequent occurrence
throughout Handel's organ concertos ; Senza re-
petizione, 'without repeat' [see REPEAT]; Senza,
tempo, 'without time,' which occurs in Schu
mann's Humoreske, op. 20, in the movement
marked Precipitoso. The right hand is marked
Come senza tempo (' Wie ausser tempo," in Ger
man), while the left remains in tempo. The same
direction is employed at the end of Chopin's
Nocturne, op. 9, no. 3. [J.A.F.M.]
SENZA 1 IATTI (without the cymbals) in
dicates that the bass-drum only is to be played,
as in the first allegro of the Overture to 'Guillaume
Tell.' [DRUM 3, last paragraph.] [V.deP.]
SEPTET (Fr. Septuor; Ital. Septetto}. A.
composition for seven instruments or voices, with
or without accompaniment.
There is no instance, among the works of the
great composers, of a septet for strings only,
though there are several octets (Mendelssohn,
Bargiel, Raff, Gade, Svendsen, etc.). Beethoven's
famous Septet for Strings and Wind naturally
heads the list, and Hummel's for Piano, Strings,
and Wind is the next best known, though far in
ferior to Spohr's difficult and brilliant work for a
similar combination (op. 147). The great paucity
of instrumental septets is probably owing to
the fact that wind instruments are too full and
powerful in tone to sound well with single strings,
or even the piano. A striking instance of this in
compatibility is accorded by Saint-SaeW recently
produced Septet for Piano, Strings and Trumpet;
but, truth to say, whenever we hear even Bee
thoven's Septet or Schubert's Octet, we have the
impression of an exceedingly feeble orchestra,
and yearn for the proper fulness of string power,
albeit these works are not in bhe least orchestral.
Operatic situations have seldom given rise
to, or opportunity for, vocal septets, but the
3 'Bibliographic' (Berlin 1S77).
464
SEPTET.
magnificent specimen in the last act of Goetz's
'Taming of the Shrew' deserves foremost mention,
and as a unique thing of its kind we may also
point to the scene (Act iii, Scene 2) in Wagner's
'Die Walkiire,' where occur several short pieces
for female voices in seven- part harmony with en
tirely independent accompaniment. [F.C.]
SEQUENCE is generally taken to mean the
repetition of a definite group of notes or chords in
different positions of the scale, like regular steps
ascending or descending, as in the following out
lines : —
d:
-C2-
^P
The device has been a favourite one with
composers, from Corelli, Bach, and Handel, to
Schumann, Brahms, and Wagner. The reason
is partly that it is so thoroughly intelligible
without being commonplace. The mind is easily
led from point to point by recognising each
successive step after the first group of chords
has been given, and is sufficiently interested by
the slight amount of diversity which prevails
at each repetition. It thus supplies a vital
element of form in a manner which in some
cases has certain advantages over simple exact
repetition, especially when short phrases are
repeated in juxtaposition. It was consequently
made much use of by early composers of sonatas,
and instrumental works of like nature, such as
Corelli and his immediate successors ; and in
many cases examples make their appearance at
analogous points in different movements, indi
cating the recognition of formal principles in their
introduction. This occurs, for instance, near the
beginning of the second half in the following
movements from Corelli's Opera Quarta : Corrente
and Allemanda of Sonata I, Allemanda and Cor
rente of Sonata 2, Corrente of Sonata 3, Corrente
and Giga of Sonata 4, Gavotte of Sonata 5,
Allemanda and Giga of Sonata 6, and so forth.
A large proportion of both ancient and modern
sequences are diatonic; that is, the groups are
repeated analogously in the same key series,
without consideration of the real difference of
quality in the intervals ; so that major sevenths
occasionally answer minor sevenths, and dimi
nished fifths perfect fifths, and so forth ; and
it has long been considered allowable to intro
duce intervals and combinations in those cir
cumstances which would otherwise have been
held inadmissible. Thus a triad on the leading
note would in ordinary circumstances be con
sidered as a discord, and would be limited in
SEQUENCE.
progression accordingly ; but if it occurred in a
sequence, its limitations were freely obviated by
the preponderant influence of the established form
of motion. Such diatonic sequences, called also
sometimes diatonic successions, are extremely
familiar in Handel's works. A typical instance
is a Capriccio in G major, published in Pauer's
'Alte Meister,' which contains at least fifteen
sequences, some of them unusually long ones, in
four pages of Allegro. The subject itself is a
characteristic example of a sequence in a single
part ; it is as follows : —
A kind of sequence which was early developed,
but which is more characteristic of later music, is
the modulatory sequence, sometimes also called
chromatic. In this form accidentals are intro
duced, sometimes by following exactly the quality
of the intervals where the diatonic series would
not admit of them, and sometimes by purposely
altering them to gain the step of modulation.
This will be easily intelligible from the following
example : —
The usefulness of the device in such circumstances
is, if anything, even more marked than it is in a
single key, because of the greater breadth of range
which it allows, and the closeness and cogency
of the successive transitions which it renders
possible. A compact and significant example to
the point is the following from a fugue by
Cherubini in C major : —
Beethoven made very remarkable use of this
device, especially in the great Sonata in Bb,
op. 106, from which an example is quoted in the
article MODULATION. [See ii. 350.] The 'working
out ' portion of the first movement of the same
sonata is an almost unbroken series of sequences
of both orders ; and the introduction to the final
fugue is even more remarkable, both for the
length of the sequence, and the originality of its
SEQUENCE.
treatment. The first-mentioned, which is from
the Slow Movement, is further remarkable as an
example of a peculiar manipulation of the device
by which modern composers have obtained very
impressive results. This is the change of emphasis
in the successive steps of which it is composed.
For instance, if the characteristic group consists
of three chords of equal length, and the time in
which it occurs is a square one, it is clear that
the chord which is emphatic in the first step will
be weakest in the next, and vice versd. This form
will be most easily understood from an outline
example : —
SEQUENTIA.
465
1 '
1 1
— I
4
i
1 !
J 1
, J
J 1
[/
J
1
W
J
• V
• •
J/f
* J
• •
«
s
Em
f[\ \
f
*
V.
i
r
m
I
n* r
J
p
i
c
ff
!
1
r r-
! '
A passage at the beginning of the Presto at the
end of Beethoven's Leonora Overture, No. 3, is a
good example of a sequence of this kind in a
single part. It begins in the following quotation
at*
The extension of the characteristic group of a
sequence is almost unlimited, but it will be obvious
at once that in harmonic sequences the shorter
and simpler they are the more immediately they
will be understood. In long-limbed sequences
the hearer may soon perceive that there is a
principle of order underlying what he hears,
though its exact nature may always elude his
apprehension, and in respectof the larger branches
of form this is a decided advantage. Among
short-limbed emphatic sequences in modern
music, the one of eight steps which occurs towards
the end of the first full portion of the Overture
to the Meistersinger is conspicuous, and it has
the advantage of being slightly irregular. The
long-limbed sequences are sometimes elaborately
concealed, so that the underlying source of order
in the progression can only with difficulty be
unravelled. A remarkable example of a very
complicated sequence of this kind is a passage
in Schumann's Fantasia in C major (op. 17),
in the movement in Eb, marked ' Moderate
con energia,' beginning at the 58th bar. The
passage is too long to quote, but the clue to the
mystery may be extracted somewhat after this
manner : —
VOL. III. PT. 3.
etc.
In order to see how this has been manipulated
reference must be made to the original.
A species of sequence which is familiar in
modern music is that in which a figure or melody
is repeated a tone higher ; this has been termed
a Rosalia. [See vol. iii, p. 1 60.] Another, which is
equally characteristic, is a repetition of a figure or
passage a semitone higher ; an example from the
Eroica Symphony is quoted in vol. ii. p. 346 of
this Dictionary.
The device has never been bound to rigid
exactness, because it is easy to follow, and slight
deviations seasonably introduced are often happy
in effect. In fact its virtue does not consist so
much in the exactness of transposition as in the
intelligibility of analogous repetitions. If the
musical idea is sufficiently interesting to carry the
attention with it, the sequence will perform its
function adequately even if it be slightly irregular
both in its harmonic steps and in its melodic
features ; and this happens to be the case both
in the example from the Slow Movement of
Beethoven's Sonata in Bb, and in, the passage
quoted from Schumann's Fantasia. It is not so,
however, with the crude harmonic successions
which are more commonly met with ; for they
are like diagrams, and if they are not exact they
are good for nothing. [C.H.H.P.]
SEQUENTIA (Prosa ; Eng. Sequence, or
Prose). A Hymn of peculiar structure, sung
on certain Festivals at High Mass, after the
Gradual, Versus, Tractus, and Alleluia.
The Sequentia owes its name to its position in
the Mass ; in which it appears, as the continua
tion, or sequence, of the long series of Verses
and Antiphons, interposed between the Epistle
and the Gospel. In the Middle Ages it was
called a Prose ; because, though written for the
most part in rhymed Latin, and frequently with
perfect uniformity of rhythm, the cadence of its
syllables was governed, not, as in classical Poetry,
by quantity, but by accent — a peculiarity which
deprived it of all claim to consideration as Verse
of any kind. Its introduction into the Liturgy
is generally supposed to date from the pth or
loth century. In the nth and I2th it was
very extensively used ; and many of the most
beautiful specimens we possess were written by
the great Hymnologists who flourished during
these productive periods. Mediaeval Office-Books
contain innumerable Sequences, of striking ori
ginality ; but, at the last revision of the Roman
Liturgy, by direction of the Council of Trent,
the greater number of these were expunged.
Five, however, were retained, in the revised
Missal ; and these five occupy a very prominent
position in the Services in which they are incor
porated, as well as in the history of Ecclesiastical
Music.
1. The Sequence appointed for Easter Sunday
is ' Victimse paschali,' the oldest now in use,
dating, in all probability, from the loth century.
2. Not very much less ancient is that for
Whit-Sunday, 'Veni Sancte Spiritus'; in rhymed
triplets of Trochaic Dimeter Catalectic, written,
about the year i ooo, by King Robert II. of France,
Hh
466
SEQUENTIA.
and called, by mediaeval writers, 'The Golden
Sequence.'
3. For the Festival of Corpus Christi, S.
Thomas Aquinas wrote the celebrated Sequence,
' Lauda Sion,' which is generally believed to date
from about the year i 261.
4. The 'Stabat Mater,' sung on the 'Feasts
of the Seven Dolours of Our Lady ' (the Friday
in Passion Week, and the Third Sunday in
September), is generally referred to the end of
the 1 2th, or beginning of the I3th century. The
name of its author has not been certainly ascer
tained : but Daniel,1 after much patient investi
gation, attributes it to Jacobus de Benedictis.
5. More justly celebrated than any of these,
is the ' Dies me,' written, during the latter half
of the 1 2th, or beginning of the I3th century, by
Thomas of Celano, and sung in the ' Requiem,'
or Mass for the Dead. In the triple Stanzas of
this wonderful Poem the rhymed Latin of the
Middle Ages attained its highest perfection ; and,
though the ' Stabat Mater ' is frequently said
to be second only to it in beauty, the distance
between the two is very great. No Latin hymn
has probably been so often translated.
The Plain Chaunt Melodies adapted to these
five Sequences, in the Gradual, differ from Hymn
Melodies chiefly in their continuity. Each
Melody is founded, it is true, upon certain fixed
and well-marked phrases ; but these phrases are
not mechanically repeated, as in the Hymn, to
each successive Stanza of the Poetry. The author
ship of these Melodies is indiscoverable. They
were probably composed by the Poet, simultane
ously with the words.
In addition to these venerable Melodies, we
possess innumerable settings of all the Sequences
now in use, by the great Masters of the Polyphonic
School ; and many, by the Classical Composers of
the 1 8th and I9th centuries. For these see
LAUDA SIGN; VENI SANCTE SPIRITUS; VICTIMS
PASCHALI ; STABAT MATER ; and DIES IR^:
(App.). [W.S.R.]
SERAFIN, SANTO and GEORGIO (uncle and
nephew), two celebrated violin-makers of Venice.
The uncle, as his label informs us ('Sanctus
Seraphin Utinensis fecit Venetiis'), was originally
of Udine, a town in the Venetian territory to
wards the mountains of Carinthia, and probably
of Jewish extraction. His violins date from
about 1710 to 1740. The nephew, if we may
judge from the style of his instruments, worked
with the uncle many years, and appears to have
succeeded him in the business. The instruments
of Sanctus Serafin occupy a middle place be
tween the Italian and the Tyrolese school. As
far as external appearance goes, the maker seems
to vacillate between the model of Stainer and
that of Nicholas Amati. But in the essential
particulars of the art, in the selection of wood of
the finest and most sonorous quality, in the
proper calculation of the proportions, and the
solidity and finish of the parts, he worked on the
principles of the Cremona makers. Few equalled
him as a workman. Those who wish to see how
i Thesaurus Hym&ologicus, Tom. II. (LipslaB, 1856).
SERAPHINE.
far mechanical perfection can be carried should
examine Serafin's purfling with a magnifying
glass. In Serafin's earlier years, the Staiuer
character predominates in his instruments : in
his later years he leaned to the Amati model.
His instruments are famous for their perfect
finish (reminding forcibly of the style of Stradi-
varius), their remarkably lustrous deep redvarnish,
and fine mellow tone.
George Serafin followed his uncle's later model
with such precision that it is difficult to find any
point of difference. Like his uncle, he finished
his instruments to a degree of perfection which
amounts to a fault, depriving them, as it does,
of character and individuality. Like his uncle,
he used a large copperplate label (nearly all the
Italian makers used letterpress labels) bearing the
inscription ' Georgius Seraphin Sancti nepos fecit
Venetiis, (1743).' Both makers branded their
instruments at the tail-pin. Their works are not
common in this country, and specimens in good
preservation realise from £20 upwards. [E. J.P.]
SERAGLIO, THE. The English title of an
adaptation of Mozart's ENTFUHRUNG ADS DEM
SERAIL, brought out at Covent Garden, Nov. 24,
1827. Much of Mozart's music was cut out,
and popular English melodies and airs from other
operas inserted instead (Moscheles, Life, i. 193).
The perpetrators of this outrage — at that time a
common proceeding — were Mr. Dimond, who
translated the book, and Kramer, the director of
the King's Band at Brighton. The scenery was
painted by David Roberts, and the effects were
'rich and amazingly beautiful' (Moscheies).— As
' II Seraglio ' and ' Der Serail' the opera was an
nounced and played, by the German Company at
Drury Lane, June 14, 1854 ; and as ' II Seraglio' it
was performed at Her Majesty's Theatre June 30,
1866, and at Covent Garden June 9, 1881. [Gr.J
SERAPHINE. In vol. i. p. 667 a reference
is made to the seraphine as a precursor of De-
bain's HARMONIUM. It was an English free-reed
instrument resembling the German Physhar-
monica, which latter was brought to this country
by the Schulz family in 1826, and introduced to
the London public at a concert at Kirkman's
rooms in Frith Street, Soho, by EDOUARD SCHULZ,
then a boy of 14. In 1828 a similar instrument,
but named Aeol-harmonica, was played by young
Schulz in a Philharmonic Concert (Concertante
for Aeol-harmonic and 2 guitars, April 28). In
1833, John Green, who had been dementi's
traveller, and had a shop in Soho Square, brought
out the Seraphine. According to Mr. Peters
(for many years with Messrs. Broad wood, and
formerly Green's pupil), the reeds for the sera
phine were made by Gunther the piano-maker,
and the cases by Bevington the organ-builder,
Green putting them together. Green engaged
old Samuel Wesley to give weekly performances
upon the seraphine at his shop, and managed for
some time to dispose of his instruments at 40
guineas each. But the seraphine was harsh and
raspy in tone, and never found favour with sen
sitive musicians. The wind apparatus, similar
to the organ, was a dead-weighted bellows giving
SERAPHINE.
a uniform pressure, and a swell was produced
by opening a shutter of a box placed over the
reeds.
In the year 1841, Mr. W. E. Evans invented
the 'Organo Harmonica,' the improvements on
the seraphine consisting of thin steel reeds artis
tically voiced, and coiled springs in the reservoir
to enable the player to produce a rapid arti
culation with a small wind pressure, and to in
crease the power of tone as the reservoir filled.
Eminent musicians, among them Potter, Novello,
and Sir George Smart, publicly pronounced Mr.
Evans's instrument more valuable than the sera
phine as a substitute for the organ, but neither
the one nor the other was capable of what is now
known as ' dead expression.'
Patents for various improvements of the sera
phine were taken out by Myers and Storer in
1839, by Storer alone in 1846, and by Mott in
the same year. There is further reference to it
in patents of Pape 1850, and Blackwell 1852.
About the last-named date it was entirely super
seded by the harmonium. [A.J.H.]
SERENADE (Ital. Serenata; Fr. Serenade;
Germ. Stdndchen). Evening song. The Italian
word Serenata means, literally, fine weather —
more especially, that of a calm summer night.
Hence, the word has been applied, indiscrimin
ately, to many different kinds of Music, intended
to be sung, or played, at night, in the open air :
and, so generally has this connection of ideas
been accepted, that, by common consent, the term
'Serenade' has identified itself, in many languages,
with the Song sung by a lover standing beneath
his mistress's window, or the Concert of Instru
mental Music substituted for it by an admirer
with ' no voice for singing.' This is not, indeed,
the only sense in which the term is used : but
it is the most popular one ; and, for the present,
we shall entirely confine ourselves to it.
To be true to Nature, a Serenade of this kind
should be simple in construction, melodious in
character, sensuous in expression, and accompa
nied by some kind of Instrument which the lover
might conveniently carry in his hand. All these
conditions are fulfilled in the most perfect example
of the style that ever has been, or is ever likely
to be written — ' Deb. vieni alia fenestra,' in 'II
Don Giovanni.' The Melody of this is as artless
as a primitive Chant du pays ; yet capable — teste
Tamburini — of breathing the very soul of volup
tuous passion ; and accompanied by a Mandoline.
No other embodiment of the type can be com
pared with this ; but ' Ecco ridente il cielo,' and
the ' Se il mio nome,' in the ' Barbieres ' of Rossini
and Paisiello, are very beautiful examples.
Stage surroundings are, however, by no means
indispensable to the true Serenade ; nor is there
any limit to the amount of earnest feeling, or
even hopeless sadness, that may be thrown into
it. Schubert has left us two examples, each of
which stands unrivalled, as the exponent of its
own peculiar vein of Poetry. Neither scenery,
nor costume, are needed, to enforce the tone of
chivalrous devotion which raises ' Who is Sylvia'
above other Compositions of its class, or to
SERENATA.
467
deepen the passionate longing of 'Leise flehen
meine Lieder.'
The distance which separates the examples we
have quoted from such Compositions as Donizetti's
' Com' e gentil,' or Kiicken's ' Maurisches Stand-
chen' is impassable : yet both are meritorious
enough in their way ; and a hundred others will
suggest themselves to the reader. From these,
however, we must turn to the consideration of
the same idea clothed in an instrumental dress.
And, let it be clearly understood that we are not
speaking, here, of the grand Instrumental Seren
ade — which is quite another thing; but of the
lover's greeting to his mistress, expressed in
instrumental form for lack of voice to sing with.
The most delicious example of this that we
possess is the Serenade in Sterndale Bennett's
Chamber Trio in A, Op. 27. We have, here,
in the sustained Melody for the Pianoforte, accom
panied by the Guitar-like pizzicato of the Stringed
Instruments, every essential feature of the vocal
Serenade, except the words ; while, in Mendels
sohn's ' Serenade and Allegro Gioioso' for Piano
forte and Orchestra (Op. 43), we may imagine,
both the lover's greeting, and the lady's brilliant
response from the Pianoforte in her boudoir.
Many more examples will suggest themselves
to the reader : but it is not often that the idea
is carried out so happily as in those we have
mentioned, [W.S.R.]
SERENATA (Ital. Serenata; Fr. Serenade;
Germ. Serenade). Though the terms Serenata
and Serenade are generally regarded as inter
changeable — so nearly synonymous, that we have
no choice but to give the one as the translated
equivalent of the other — they mean, in musical
language, two very different things. We have
described the Serenade, in the foregoing article.
We have now to speak of the Serenata ; which
has nothing in common with its shorter namesake,
beyond its assumed fitness for an evening per
formance in the open air.1
The Serenata may be either vocal or instru
mental. The vocal form is the oldest ; but neither
the most common, nor the most clearly defined,
as to scope and intention. It may, in fact, be
considered as a form of Cantata ; which may be
either dramatic, or imaginative, or even a simple
Ode on any subject not actually sacred. Handel
applied the term to his Italian Pastoral, 'Aci,
Galatea, e Polifemo,' written, at Naples, in 1 709 ;
to the Ode composed for the Birthday of Anne of
Denmark, in 1712 ; and to the English Pastoral,
' Acis and Galatea,'2 written, at Cannons, in 1 720.
It is quite possible that all these works may
have been originally performed in the open air :
the first, on a calm evening at Naples ; the
second, in the Court Yard of S. James's Palace ;
and the third, in the Park, at Cannons. But it is
equally possible that the name may have been
given, in each case, to a Composition supposed
to be suitable for performance, al fresco, on a
1 It will, however, be noticed, that, in this case, the word given
as the German equivalent for Serenata is not 'Stftndchen,' but
'Serenade.' The technical terminology of Germany here draws a
distinction which is not perceptible in that of other countries.
2 Called also, in early copies, ' Opera,' ' Mask,' and ' Pastoral.'
Hh2
SERENATA.
fitting evening, though not actually so performed.
We must not omit mention of Stradella's Sere
nata; in which two lovers, each with his orchestra
in a coach, serenade a lady, a work which Handel
honoured by borrowing from it. [For this see
STRADELLA.]
Quite distinct from Compositions of this class
is the Instrumental Serenata, the form of which
is much more clearly defined, and comprised
within much narrower limits. This now neg
lected, and almost obsolete Art-form, was a very
popular one during the latter half of the i8th
century; and, for some considerable time, occu
pied a position midway between those of the
Orchestral Suite which preceded, and the Sym
phony which followed it. From the former it
borrowed the multiplicity, and from the latter
the colouring, of the long series of lightly-
developed Movements of which it usually con
sisted. Neither the sequence nor the structure
of these Movements was subject to any very rigid
law. Two forms, however, were considered so
necessary that they may almost be described as
indispensable — the March, and the Minuet. With
the former, almost every Serenata of any conse
quence began, or ended. The latter was almost
always interposed between two Allegros, or an
Allegro and an Andante, or, indeed, between
any two Movements of any other kind ; and
used so freely, that it frequently made its appear
ance, several times, in the course of a Composi
tion of importance. The Gavotte, and Bourre'e,
so freely used in the older Suite, were completely
banished from the Serenata. The Instruments
employed were Violins, Violas, Violoncellos,
Double-basses, Flutes, Oboes, Bassoons> Horns,
Trumpets, and Drums : rarely Clarinets, for,
when the Serenata was at its best, the Clarinet
was not much used, in ordinary Orchestras.
Mozart, however, has used both Clarinets and
Corni di Bassetto in Serenatas written for Wind
Instruments alone, or Wind Instruments sup
ported only by a Double-bass. When Wind
Instruments alone were employed, the Compo
sition was often called 'Harmoniemusik'; and
this term was so generally received, that Music
for Wind Instruments is popularly called 'Har
mony,' in Germany, to the present day. The
term Cassation was also frequently applied to
works of this kind, whether written for t}ie full
Orchestra or for Wind Instruments alone ; and
many pieces, not differing very much from these,
were called Divertimenti. Sometimes the number
of Instruments employed was very small. Bee
thoven has written a Serenata, of some length
(Op. 25) for Flute, Violin, and Viola, only ; and
another very complete one (Op. 8), for Violin,
Viola, and Violoncello. The reason for this
diversity of Instruments is obvious. The Sere
nata was almost always intended for private
performance. It was, therefore, a matter of
necessity that it should accommodate itself to the
resources of the particular establishment for which
it was intended.
The form of the Serenade varied, within certain
limits, almost as much as its Instrumentation.
SERENATA.
Mozart has left us eleven examples — Nos. 100,
101, 185, 203, 204, 239, 250, 320, 361, 375, and
388, in Kochel's Catalogue. Some of these con
tain as many as eight distinct Movements. Of
the introductory March, and the indispensable
Minuet, we have already spoken. In addition
to these, there are generally two principal Alle
gros, or an Allegro and a Rondo, or Presto, like
those of a Symphony ; and two Andantes, each
preceded and followed by a Minuet. The
Minuets are constantly varied with two or more
Trios, each for different combinations of Instru
ments. In No. 185 there are two lovely An
dantes ; one with Oboe and Horn, obbligato ;
the other for Stringed Instruments and Flutes.
In other Movements, Solo Violins are employed,
with admirable effect. No. 239 is written for
a double Orchestra, consisting of Stringed Instru
ments only — including two Solo Violins — and
Drums ; and the effect of this combination is
singularly happy. One striking peculiarity of
the Serenata is, that, unlike the Symphony, it
does not, as a general rule, employ the entire
Orchestra in every Movement. This arrange
ment adds greatly to its effects of light and
shade ; as, for instance, when the whole body of
Instruments is made ta unite, in the Coda of a
Minuet, to the earlier portions of which an indi
viduality of colouring has been imparted by the
employment of new and varied combinations
contrasted together in each of the several Trios.
The prominent features of the Serenata are,
one and all, so strikingly exemplified in the
writings of Mozart, that we can recommend no
more interesting or instructive models than these
for the student's guidance. Haydn also wrote
Serenatas, but seems to have taken less kindly
to the style than Mozart — probably from the
deeper love he naturally felt for the Symphony
of his own creation. That Schubert should have
left the style untried is more surprising ; unless,
indeed, we have to deplore the loss of any works
of the kind among his perished MSS. From the
pen of Beethoven, we possess only the two ex
amples already cited. That written for Violin,
Viola, and Violoncello, commonly known as the
' Serenade Trio' (Op. 8), is a delicious inspiration,
in D major, consisting of a spirited March, an
Adagio, a Minuet, a second Adagio, a Scherzo,
with which the Adagio is thrice alternated, a
Polacca, a Thema con Variazioni, and a repetition
of the opening March, by way of Finale. The
second example (Op. 25), written in the same
key, for Flute, Violins, and Violas, contains an
Entrata, a Minuet, with two Trios, an Allegro
molto, an Andante con Variazioni, an Allegro
scherzando e vivace, an Adagio, and an Allegro
vivace.
Haydn's comparative neglect of the Serenata
foreshadowed, only too plainly, the treatment it
was afterwards destined to meet with at the
hands of the musical world in general. The more
perfect development of the Symphony put an
end to the desire for its cultivation ; the gradual
diminution in the number of private Orchestras,
to the necessity for its production : and this, so
SERENATA.
SERPENT.
469
completely, that, had we not all been familiarised
with it, through the entertainment provided for
Don Giovanni at his fatal supper-table, it would
long since have passed quite out of mind. And
after all the character of that delightful entertain
ment approaches more nearly to that of a Diver
timento, than to that of a true Serenata. [W.S.R.]
SERGEANT TRUMPETER, An officer of
the royal household, who presides over 16 trum
peters in ordinary. The first mention of the office
occurs in the reign of Edward VI., when it was
held by Benedict Browne (who had been one of
the 1 6 trumpeters to Henry VIII. at a salary of
i6d. a day), at an annual salary of 24^. 6s. Sd.
The office does not appear to have been regularly
kept up for a very long period. It is not again
mentioned in any list of royal musicians until
1641. No further notice of it occurs until 1685,
when Gervase Price held it, and appointments to
it have since been continuously made. Price was
succeeded by Matthias Shore, one of the trum
peters in ordinary, who was followed in 1700 by
his son William, who in his turn was replaced,
a few years later, by his brother John, the most
celebrated trumpeter of his time. [See SHORE.]
On John Shore's death in 1752 Valentine Snow,
the most eminent performer of the day, for whom
Handel wrote the difficult obbligato trumpet parts
in his oratorios etc., obtained the appointment.
Snow died in 1770, and for a long time the
majority of his successors were not even musicians.
[See SNOW, VALENTINE.] One of them, however,
John Charles Crowle, who held the office in
1812, deserves mention for having bequeathed
to the British Museum the splendidly illustrated
copy of Pennant's 'London,3 so dear to lovers of
London topography. About 1858 it was de
cided that the office should again be given to
a musician, although not to a trumpeter, and
Joseph Williams, the eminent clarinettist, a
member of the Queen's band of music, received
the appointment; and upon his death in April
1875, J. G. Waetzig, the excellent bassoon
player, also a member of the Queen's band, was
appointed his successor, and is the present holder
of the office (1882). The salary of the office has
long been £100 per annum. The Sergeant
Trumpeter formerly claimed, under letters patent,
a fee of lid. a day from every person sounding
a trumpet, beating a drum, or playing a fife in
any play or show without his licence (for which
license 205. a year was demanded), and Matthias
and William Shore successively issued advertise
ments in the newspapers authorising all magis
trates to receive such fees for them, and apply
them to the relief of the poor. Such privileges
were, however, long since abrogated. [W. H.H.]
SEROFF (SYEROFF), ALEXANDER NIKO-
LAEVITCH, a Russian composer, born at Peters
burg May II, 1818. Although his musical gifts
developed themselves early, and he was educated
on the violoncello by Carl Schuberth, and in
general musical knowledge byHunke, it was not
till 1850, and after holding an appointment in
the Crimea, that he forsook the law (in which
he had risen to the rank of magistrate) for the
profession of music. He came before the public
first as a critic, in an attack on Oulibischeff's
pamphlet on Beethoven ('Beeth. ses Critiques
et ses Glossateurs ') and on Fe"tis 1, as well as in
many papers in favour of Wagner in various
periodicals ; and at length, by the establishment
of a periodical of his own, 'The Arts' ('!&-
kustro'), 1860; and 'Theatre and Music' (' Teatr
o Muzika'), 1867. In 1863 he made his first pub
lic appearance as a composer, of both libretto
and music, in two grand operas produced at
the Imperial Opera House, 'Judith,' May 16;
and 'Rogneida,' October 27. Both were success
ful, and ' Rogneida,' which owed its popularity in
some measure to the church music introduced,
ran for 23 nights in three months, and procured
for its author an imperial pension of 1 200 roubles.
These were followed in 1866 by 'Taras Bulba,'
and in 1867 by ' Wakula the Smith,' a ballet — the
words of the former and the action of the latter
being founded by himself on one of Gogol's novels,
but neither arriving at performance ; and those
again by ' Wrajia Siela,' or ' The Power of Evil,'
the libretto of which he constructed from a drama
of Ostrowski's. On this work he bestowed enor
mous pains, and the 5th act was still unfinished
when he died (Petersburg, Feb. 1871). It was
completed by his friend SolowiefF, and produced at
St. Petersburg on the i gth of the following April.
It has now become a great favourite. Seroff was
an extreme and enthusiastic partisan for Wagner.
In addition to the works already mentioned, he
composed an Ave Maria, written for Mad. A.Patti
in 1868 ; a Stabat Mater<(for three female voices),
and music to Schiller's Song of the Bell. [G.]
SERPENT (Eng. and Fr. ; Germ. Scklangen-
rohr ; Ital. Serpentone). An ail-but obsolete in
strument forming the natural bass of the ancient
cornet family, played with a cupped mouthpiece
similar to that of the
bass trombone. It
consists of a wooden
tube about 8 feet long,
increasing conically
from ^ of an inch in
diameter at th e mou th-
piece to 4 inches at
the open end. The
name is obviously de
rived from the curved
form into which the
tube is contorted,
presenting three U-
shaped turns followed
by a large circular
convolution. The bell
end is moreover turn
ed forward from the
player, and the mouth
piece makes a right-
angled backward turn
to reach his lips.
There are six holes on
the front of the instrument, to be stopped by the
three middle fingers of either hand ; those for
i These are reviewed in Liszt's ' Kritik der Kritik.'
470
SERPENT.
the left hand on the third descending branch ;
those for the right on the fourth ascending branch
towards the bell. The holes are set in groups of
three, within reach of the outstretched fingers.
The hands are passed through the convolutions
to the front of the tube, away from the performer ;
the weight of the whole is supported on the
upper edges of the two forefingers, and grasped
by the two thumbs, which are kept at the back
of the instrument.
The serpent is considered to consist of three
parts, (i) the mouthpiece, (2) the crook, or curved
brass tube leading into (3) the wooden body,
which is built up of several pieces held together
by a leathern covering. It is usually said to have
been invented by a canon of Auxerre, named
Ednas' Guillaume, in 1590. The story bears a
somewhat suspicious resemblance to that of the
discovery of the bassoon by a canon of Ferrara
in the first half of the same century. But there
can be no doubt that about this period clerical
musicians employed bass reed and brass instru
ments for the accompaniment of ecclesiastical
plainsong. Indeed Mersenne, who gives a remark
ably good and complete account of the Serpent,
notices that ' even when played by a boy it is
sufficient to support the voices of twenty robust
monks.' The Serpent d'Eglise is still a recognised
functionary in French churches.
The scale of the Serpent is in the highest de
gree capricious, and indeed fortuitous. In this
respect it resembles the bassoon. Mersenne gives
it a compass of seventeen diatonic notes from
eight-foot D upwards, and intimates that the
intervening chromatics can be obtained by half-
stopping. He does not name the device of cross-
fingering so largely employed on the bassoon.
Berlioz, who speaks slightingly of it, states that
it is in Bb, and that parts for it 'must be written
a whole tone above the real sound.' The old parts
however from which the writer played 17 years
ago at the Saored Harmonic Society were all,
without exception, in C.
It is obvious that the Serpent, like every other
instrument with a cupped mouthpiece, can pro
duce the usual harmonic series of notes. These
in Mersenne's work seem limited to the fun
damental, its octave, and twelfth. There would
be no difficulty in obtaining a far larger compass.
Lichtenthal1 who, as an Italian, highly values the
Serpent, gives its compass as no less than four
full octaves from the Do bassissimo, which 'does
not exist on the pianoforte (1826), but on the
pedal of the organ of 16 feet,' up to the Do of
the violin on the third space. He states more
over that the lowest sound of Do can only be
used from time to time, ' avendo bisogno di una
particolare buona imboccatura ' — requiring a
specially good lip. It is evidently a ' pedal ' note
similar to those obtained on the trombone, and a
good instance of the great licence given to the lip
in instruments of this character.
It will be seen from the woodcut that one
hand being applied to an ascending, and the
other to a descending branch, the usual sequence
1 Dizionario della Musica, torn. i. p. 193.
SERPETTE.
of fingering is inverted in the two hands ; the
scale proceeding downwards in the left and up
wards in the right. The Serpent is probably
the only instrument in existence exhibiting so
quaint and unscientific a device. This fact,
and the different lengths of sounding-tube in
tervening between the holes — the distance be
tween the mouthpiece and the first finger-hole
being 44 inches ; between the next three only
about 4 inches in all ; between these and the
next three for the right hand, 13 inches; and
from the last hole to the bell, 31 inches; making
96 inches, or 8 feet — indicate the great imperfec
tion of the instrument mechanically considered,
and point to the conclusion that a good player
must have relied more on his dexterity and
on the strength of his embouchure, as mentioned
above, than on the resources of the instrument
itself. Later makers, however, added a multi
plicity of keys, both above and below, which only
complicated without facilitating performance. It
is well known that the notes D, A, and some
others, the holes for which were the most ap
proximately correct in position, had far greater
force and correctness than others less accurately
planted on the resonant tube. On the other
hand, owing to the material of the Serpent and
to its bore, its tone was certainly more tender
and less obtrusive than that of the blatant brass
valve-instruments which have replaced it in the
modern orchestra. It is practically disused
except in some few foreign churches, and for
gotten by all but musical antiquaries. A part
for it is however found in the score of Mendels
sohn's overtures ' The Calm Sea and Prosperous
Voyage ' and ' St. Paul,' in the overtures to
' Masaniello,' ' The Siege of Corinth ' (between
the 2nd and 3rd trombones), and ' Rienzi.' It is
also found in the Score of ' I Vepri Sicilian!.' It
is usually replaced in performance by the ophi-
cleide. A Yorkshireman of Richmond, named
Hurworth, who played in the private band of
George III., could execute elaborate flute varia
tions with perfect accuracy on this unwieldy in
strument. There were till a few years ago two
Serpents in the band of the Sacred Harmonic
Society, played by Mr. Standen and Mr. Pimlett.
They were, however, dispensed with soon after
the introduction of two of the writer's improved
contrafagotti.
There is a Method for the Serpent, containing
studies and duets, published by Cocks. The only
concerted music set down to it seems to have been
originally intended for the bassoon.
A ' Contra Serpent ' was shown in the Exhibi
tion of 1851, made by Jordan of Liverpool. It
was in Eb of the i6-foot octave. It was how
ever too unwieldy to be carried by the player,
and required independent support. Another
modification of this instrument was invented by
Beacham and played on by Prospere in Jullien's
orchestra. It was named the Serpentcleide, and
was essentially an ophicleide with a body of wood
instead of brass. [W. H. S.]
SERPETTE, GASTON, French composer, born
at Nantes Nov. 4. 1846, began lile as an advocate,
SERPETTE.
but gave up the bar for music. He was a pupil
of Ambroise Thomas at the Conservatoire, and
took the ' Grand prix ' in 1871 for a cantata
(Jeanne d1 Arc) of great promise. On his return
from Italy, despairing of acceptance at the Ope'ra
Comique, he closed with the Bouffes Parisiens,
and produced ' La Branche casse"e ' (3 acts,
Jan. 23, 1874), with a success which induced
him to go on composing works of the same slight
character. ' Le Manoir du Pic Tordu ' (May 28,
1875), 'Le Moulin du Vert galant' (April 12.
1876), and 'La Petite Muette' (Oct. 3, 1877),
all in 3 acts, followed in Paris, and ' La Nuit de
St. Germain' (March 1 880) in Brussels. Neither
this nor ' Koby,' composed in Borne, have been
published, though the former contains pretty
flowing music. Some of Serpette's detached
melodies show that he might succeed in a higher
class of work than he has yet attempted. His
last feat is ' Madame le Diable' (April 5, 1882),
composed for Jeanne Granier, the favourite sing
ing actress of 'La Renaissance' theatre. [G.C.]
SERVA PADRONA, LA— the maid turned
mistress. An Italian intermezzo, or piece in 2
acts, containing 3 characters, one of whom is a
mute. Words by Nelli, music by Pergolesi.
Written and produced at Naples in 1 731 or 1733,
and in Paris first on October 4, 1746, at the
Theatre Italien, where it had a long run, and
again at the Academic on August i, 1752. This
was followed by an obstinate contest between the
reformers, headed by Rousseau, and the conserva
tive musicians — ' Guerre des Lullistes et des '
Bouffonistes.' In 1754 a translation, 'La ser-
vante maitresse,' was brought out, and had a
run of 150 consecutive nights. It was revived,
Aug. 13, 1862, at the Opera Comique, for the
debut of Mme. Galli-Marie, and was given in
London, at the 'Royalty,' March 7, 1873. — An
imitation of Nelli's libretto, with the same title,
was composed by Paisiello during his stay at
St. Petersburg. [G.]
SERVAIS, ADEIEN FRANCOIS, a great violon
cellist, was born at Hal, near Brussels, June 7,
1807. His study of music began early, but
it was not till he heard a solo by Platel on
the cello, that he fixed on the instrument on
which he became so famous. He became a
pupil of Platel's in the Brussels Conservatoire,
where he rapidly rose to the first rank. At the
advice of Fe"tis he went to Paris, where his suc
cess was great. In 1835 he visited England, and
on May 25 played a concerto of his own at the
Philharmonic Concert, where he was announced
as ' principal violoncello to the King of the Bel
gians.' He then returned home, and wisely re
solved to study for a year, and it was during this
period that he formed the style by which he was
afterwards known. In 1836 he reappeared in
Paris, and the next dozen years were occupied in
a series of long tours. through Germany, Holland,
Austria, Norway, Russia, and even Siberia. In
1842 he married in St. Petersburg. In 1848 he
settled at Brussels as Professor in the Conserva
toire, and formed many distinguished pupils. He
SERVICE.
471
died at his native village Nov. 26, 1866, of an
illness contracted during his third visit to Peters
burg. His works comprise 3 Concertos, and 16
Fantasies, for cello and orchestra ; 6 Etudes for
cello and PF. — with Gre*goir ; 14 Duos for ditto ;
3 Duets for violin and cello — with Leonard ; one
Duet for ditto — with Vieuxtemps. His honours
were many, and gave point to Rossini's 'bon mot —
that he was the King of Cellists still more than
the Cellist of Kings. Servais' tastes were very
simple, and his great delight was to slip on a
blouse and (like Mozart) play skittles. At the
close of his life he became very stout, and the peg
now used to support the cello is said to have been
invented by him as a relief. A biography of
Servais was published at Hal by Vanderbroeck
Desmeth, 1866. His eldest son JOSEPH, born at
Hal Nov. 28, 1850, succeeded his father in June
1872 as professor of the cello at the Brussels
Conservatoire. He appeared first at Warsaw
with his father, and the pair excited the greatest
enthusiasm. In 1868 he was appointed solo
violoncellist at Weimar and remained two years.
In 1875 he played for the first time in Paris at
one of Pasdeloup's Popular Concerts, when some
of the journals spoke in terms of extravagant
praise of his performance. The instrument used
by both father and son is a fine Stradivarius pre
sented by the Princess Yousoupoff. A second
son, FKAN^OIS MATTHIEU was a pupil in the
same establishment. [T.P.H.]
SERVICE. In matters relating to the Church
this word is used in two totally different senses ;
first, as a rough translation of Officium, Ordo,
Situs, as when we say Communion-service, Or
dination-service, and so on ; next as a purely
musical term, as when we say 'Wesley's Service
in E,' etc. It is with this latter application of
the word only that we have here to deal.
A Service may be defined as a collection of
musical settings of the canticles and other por
tions of the liturgy which are by usage allowed
to be set to free composition. The term there
fore excludes all versicles or responses, or other
portions founded onplainsong ; all chants, whether
Gregorian or Anglican ; and all anthems, as
their words are not necessarily embodied in the
liturgy, but selected at will. On the other hand,
it includes the Nicene Creed, Gloria in excelsis,
and other portions of the liturgy which have from
the most ancient times received a more or less
free musical treatment.
The origin of the acceptance of the term in
this limited musical sense is somewhat obscure.
The gradual disuse of distinctive names of offices
— such, for instance, as Matins, Vespers, Mass,
etc. — after the Reformation, helped to bring the
generic word ' service ' into very general use ;
and it has therefore been supposed that musicians
called their compositions ' services ' because they
were set to certain unvarying portions of the
church 'services.' But this explanation is far
from satisfactory, for obvious reasons ; it gives
too much latitude to the term, and offers no
reason why it should ever have become limited
to its present meaning. But a much more simple
472
SERVICE.
explanation is possible if the popular use of the
word 'service' be looked into. Originally sig
nifying the duty rendered by servant or slave
it afterwards became used roughly for the per
sons rendering the service, just as we now hear
people speak of the 'Civil Service,' meaning
the body of men who do the service, and of a
' service ' of railway trains, meaning a regular
group or succession. From this conception the
word obtains a further meaning of a 'set' of
things having a definite use ; for example a
'dinner-service' — a 'set' of things for use at
dinner; or, again, a f service of plate' — a 'set'
of gold or silver vessels, etc. Although an
analogous meaning of the musical term seems
not hitherto to have been suggested, its correct
ness appears so highly probable that we shall in
future understand by ' service ' merely a ' set ' of
canticles or other movements prepared by a com
poser for use at a complete function.
The fullest form of a set or service would
include free musical compositions for (i) The
Venite, (2) Te Deum, (3) Benedicite, (4) Bene-
dictus, (5) Jubilate, (6) Kyrie eleison, (7) Nicene
Creed, (8) Sanctus, (9) Gloria in excelsis ; (10)
Magnificat, (n) Cantate Domino, (12) Nunc
Dimittis, (13) Deus Misereatur.
It will be necessary to say a few words about
some of these movements separately before
making any remarks on our services generally.
The Venite has long since disappeared from
the list of free compositions, and is now univer
sally treated as one of the psalms, and sung to
a chant instead of being rendered as a motet.
In the form in which the Venite was printed
in the Breviary may perhaps be traced the
reason why many of our earliest church-com
posers after the Reformation, such as Tallis,
Bevin, Bird, Gibbons, and others, left settings
of the Venite in motet-form. But this treat
ment of the psalm was probably found to lengthen
unduly the time occupied by the Matins ; and it
may also have been felt that an elaborate choral
setting of these particular words seriously injured
their force as an invitation to join in public
worship. On the whole it is not a matter for
regret that the Venite now takes its place merely
as an introductory psalm. It is perhaps worthy
of remark that the custom, still prevalent in many
parts of the country, of singing the Venite only,
and then reading the psalms for the day, may be
the slowly dying tradition of a time when the
Venite was sung to a special musical setting.
Those who maintain this custom should at least
open their eyes to the absurdity of inviting people
to 'sing unto the Lord,' and then permitting
them only to say the psalms.
The free setting of the Benedicite omnia opera
did not long maintain its ground, owing probably
to its excessive length. Purcell set this canticle,
and it is even now occasionally sung to his music ;
Blow also wrote an elaborate Benedicite in his
Service in E minor. But the canticle itself fell
for a long time into neglect, and when revived,
it was sung either to a chant in triple measure,
or to a 'single' chant, or to a Gregorian tone
SERVICE.
having a ' short ending.' Hayes contributed one
of the earliest triple-measure chants.
The Gloria in excelsis, though set to music
by Tallis, fell almost entirely out of the 'ser
vice' owing to the loss of choral celebrations
of the Holy Communion. On their resumption
during the last few years the Gloria has once
more been included in the set, after a long
period of virtual disuse. The Kyrie eleison and
Sanctus maintained their place in the set ;
the former because it was always sung at the
so-called 'table -prayers'" (that is, a Communion-
office brought to a sudden conclusion at the
end of the Creed, Sermon, or Prayer for the
Church militant) ; the latter lived on as an
introit, a duty it fulfilled at one time univer
sally in our cathedrals ; happily it has now been
superseded by a short appropriate anthem or
hymn.
The Jubilate completely ousted the Benedicttis
for a long period. The earliest writers of our
Reformed Church — Tallis, Byrd, Gibbons, Bevin,
Farrant, and others — set the JBenedictus to music,
but it was afterwards practically lost, until,
within the last few years, a better feeling has
restored it to the place which it should hold
according to the spirit of the rubric, if not ac
cording to its letter.
The Cantate Domino and Deus misereatur
may be said to have been in fashion from time
to time. Both Blow and Purcell set these alter
native canticles, and later Aldrich also ; but they
reached their highest popularity at the end of
last and the early part of this century. At the
present time they have again fallen somewhat
into the background.
In addition to the contents of a service as
above enumerated, the most modern composers
add musical settings of the Offertory sentences,
also of the Doxologies before and after the Gospel,
and sometimes also of the Sursum Corda, Agnus
Dei, and Benedicius. The Offertory sentences
may perhaps be looked upon as a legitimate
addition to the set, but the Gospel-doxologies and
Sursum Corda have both their own ancient
plainsong, and the Agnus Dei and JBenedictus
are not ordered by our rubric to be sung in the
office of Holy Communion.
Having made these few remarks about the
contents of a service, we must now discuss the
musical character of our English services, assum
ing that a Te Deum, JBenedictus (or Jubilate),
Magnificat, and Nunc Dimittis may be taken as
the main framework of an ordinary service. It can
hardly be doubted that Tallis, the chief of the
early post- Reformation composers, was influenced,
when setting his celebrated Te Deum in D minor,
by the character of the then well-known Am-
brosian Te Deum which Marbecke published in
the 1550 Prayer-book. There can -be traced an
evident wish to form a melody, if not actually
in a Church mode, in a tonality closely resembling
one of them. Tallis also avoided contrapuntal
devices (in which he was a distinguished expert),
and limited within strict bounds the ambitus of
his melody and the number of his harmonic com-
SERVICE.
binations. Anybody who will take the trouble
to compare his graceful and melodious anthems
' Hear the voice and prayer ' and ' If ye love
Me' with his Service, must perceive that he wrote
his setting of the canticles under an evident self-
imposed restraint. The whole of the Service was
made to follow absolutely the style of the Te
Deum, and the result is, that music of a dignified
and ecclesiastical type has been produced — pure,
perhaps, but certainly uninteresting. Led in
this direction by so great and famous a composer
as Tallis, many of his contemporaries and im
mediate successors followed in his footsteps,
and English cathedrals possess a considerable
store of plain contrapuntal services in minor keys.
This style, the growth of the middle of the i6th
century, has even been imitated by those modern
purists who seem, to think that the highest func
tion of an art consists in founding factories of
sham antiques. It is often a matter of surprise
to those untutored in the narrow traditions of
our cloisters why such glorious canticles as the
Te Deum and Magnificat should be so often sung
to music of the most sad and sombre description.
The explanation now becomes simple. The oldest
known Te Deum was in the Phrygian mode ;
Tallis wrote his setting in an irregular Doric
mode ; his followers, having lost the knowledge of
the church modes, used the minor keys instead :
the fashion, once started, kept its hold on church
musicians for a considerable period. These
'minor' settings of the canticles will, however,
sometimes be found remarkably suitable for use
in penitential seasons, or in times of public ca
lamity — a contracted but respectable sphere of
utility.
Closely following the class of services just de
scribed comes the strict contrapuntal school, of
which ' Gibbons in F' forms such a noble example.
Gibbons has not found so many imitators as would
be expected, but the real reason probably lies in
the fact that his counterpoint is so remarkably
smooth and fine that it is not an easy task to
follow in his steps. Tallis died in 1585, Gibbons
in 1625 — just forty years later; a change or
growth of musical style might therefore have
been expected at the latter date. It must not
be thought that Gibbons was the first to write
the 'pure contrapuntal' service; a Magnificat
and Nunc Dimittis by Dr. Tye (who was organist
to Edward VI.) show that he transferred his
motet-style without any change to his settings of
these canticles, which consist almost entirely of
short 'points' or phrases of four-part imitation.
This is just what Gibbons did, but he threw more
melodic freedom and greater breadth into his
work, and therefore it has lived, while Tye's
Magnificat is only known to antiquarians.
Half a century after the death of Gibbons the
settings of the canticles had become merely
meaningless collections of short 'points'; and,
instead of running on with dignified continuity,
the music came to be broken up into a number
of small sections, for voices soli alternately with,
or in frequent contrast to, short choruses. The
influence of the French school, which had the
SERVICE.
473
most disastrous effects on English anthems,
affected the services also, though to a lesser de
gree. The services of Purcell and Blow may be
considered typical of both the virtues and vices
of this school, — melodious, but restless and pur
poseless.
Seven years before the death of Blow a man
was born, who, without possessing any special
musical gifts, was destined to bring about a vast
change in the character of services ; that maa
was the very second-rate Charles King. The
only possible way of accounting for the enormous
popularity of his services is to view them as a
protest against contrapuntal devices, and as
a restoration of simplicity, even if the simplicity
is closely allied to weakness. To the influence
of King we probably owe two short but beautiful
settings from the pen of Dr. Boyce (who died
about thirty years after him) ; one is in the key
of C, the other in A.
The next development of the form and character
of services was the forerunner of the present
'dramatic' school. Attwood deserves an im
portant place in any sketch of the history of
services for his bold attempt to attach to the
words music which should vary as their character.
This had of course been done to some extent
before his time, but nearly always with a polite
leaning to the conventionalities of the past ;
Attwood struck out a fresh path. This fact
should be borne in mind by those who are dis
posed to criticise severely the weak points in
his services. Attwood died in 1838, and we
soon find ourselves face to face with S. S. Wesley,
whose Service in E has been, and is, a model for
many living writers ; and he has been followed
by a large group of living composers, all of whom
are striving to produce services in which the
natural emotions called up by the character of
the words shall be reflected in unartificial music.
From the above sketch it will be seen that the
service has gone through some such stages of
growth as the following :— *-
1 . Early simple harmonic (Tallis, Patrick, and
others).
2. Early contrapuntal (Gibbons and others).
3. Late contrapuntal (Blow, Purcell, and
others).
4. Late simple harmonic (King, Boyce, and
others).
5. Modern dramatic (Attwood, Wesley, and
others).
Yet these divisions, although well-marked in
the works of th'e leaders of each school, are com
pletely broken down by that large number of
composers who have either followed some pre
vious school implicitly, or have combined the
characteristics of several.
It has already been stated that Gibbons had
but few imitators, yet his influence on both Child
and Creyghton is distinctly marked. These two
musicians were born early in the I yth century,
Child in 1606, Creyghton in 1639. The services
by Child in the keys of F and G followed the
cheerful bright character of Gibbons ; the same
remark applies to the well-known Service ia Efc>
474
SERVICE.
by Creyghton. In each of these cases a major key
has been selected and the gloomy colouring of the
earliest school entirely discarded. When King
tried his hand at counterpoint he generally made
a sad mess of it, hence his Service in C and his
Service in F (especially the Magnificat and Nunc
Dimittis) are those which were most liked, and
to them was principally due the initiation of the
later simple harmonic style. To this school Dr.
Cooke, organist of Westminster Abbey (b. 1734)
contributed a most useful service in the key of G-.
The Te Deum of the deservedly popular Service
in F by Henry Smart proves how much breadth
and dignity can be thrown into the ' late simple
harmonic ' style by the hand of genius ; other
portions of the service, especially the Benedictus
and Nicene Creed belong to the modern dramatic
school.
One of the finest, if not the finest setting of
the Te Deum and Jubilate to which the English
Church can point, is that by Croft, in A. It
combines a suitable variety of sentiment with a
d.'gnified unity as a whole ; and while in turn it
is plaintive, penitential, or joyous, it bursts at
the close of the Gloria to the Jubilate into a rich
fugato highly artistic and effective.
It has been asserted that our modern church-
composers have had placed before them the same
problem which confronted Palestrina, and are
solving it in the wrong way. This is not the
case. The real question is broadly this — Should
church-music be a level unvarying vehicle for
supporting the sacred words, or should it strive
to illustrate them ? Or, in other words — Should
it be a passive receptacle, a mere unobjectionable
frame to which the words are to be fitted, or
should the music be an active and appropriate
comment on the text ? The question is not one
which can be answered off-hand ; all that we
can do here is to chronicle the fact that our
modern composers have adopted the latter view,
and are striving to do for sacred music what the
'romantic' school did for the secular branch.
If modern writers of services can be sometimes
charged with sentimentality, they can retort that
they at least do not exhibit primitive dreariness.
Palestrina had to choose between the frivolous
artificialities which had then burdened church-
music, and the classical style of his own adop
tion ; not between a classical style and a romantic
style not then dreamed of. A careful balancing
of the various merits of different characters of
services will, it is to be hoped, lead our modern
writers to form an eclectic schflol which shall
avoid weak sentimentality on the one side, and
orthodox dryness on the other. But controversy
on this subject has for the last few years been
running very high, and opposing parties are not
in that temper of mind which can contemplate
eclecticism as desirable.
The use of the full orchestra in our cathedrals
and churches, which has become common during
the last few years, has called into existence a
considerable number of festival settings of the
Magnificat and Nunc Dimittis; these are dis
tinctly modern in character of course, but are
SERVICE.
for the most part admirable specimens of their
kind.
It rarely happens that any foreigner attempts
to enter the mysterious boundaries of English
service-music ; yet Mendelssohn ventured upon
the step. His Te Deum and Jubilate in A,
Magnificat in Bb and Nunc Dimittis in Eb, are
evident attempts to follow a style to which he
had no doubt been attracted by his occasional
visits to St. Paul's and Westminster Abbey. Of
these four canticles, the Te Deum is unquestion
ably the finest, the last portion reaching a high
standard of beauty and pathos. The contra
puntal writing of the Magnificat is exceedingly
clever, especially the fugue to the words ' as he
promised ' ; the Nunc Dimittis is rather spoilt
than improved by the reintrod action of the
prayer ' Lord now lettest Thou Thy servant
depart in peace,' after the triumphal burst 'To
be a light to lighten the Gentiles.' But the
whole work is published in octavo form and
takes its place amongst the services on the
music-lists of our principal cathedrals, a strong
evidence of its appreciation by our conservative
church musicians.
Those who desire to study the literature of
services will find ample materials in Barnard's
Collection (imperfect and rare) ; Boyce's Collec
tion of Cathedral Music, 3 vols. ; Arnold's Col
lection, 3vols.; Rimbault's Collection of Services,
I vol. ; Ouseley's Collection of Services, i vol. ;
various manuscripts in our cathedrals. Full
information as to Barnard's Collection will be
found under the head BARNARD, vol. i. p. 140 of
this Dictionary ; to each of the succeeding col
lections above named interesting biographical
notices are attached, for the most part extremely
correct. Ouseley has given a notice of Kichard
Farrant as the composer of an ' early simple
harmonic ' Service in D minor ; this however
was composed by a ' Mr. Farrant of Salisbury/
not by Richard Farrant; they were probably
near relatives.
The rapid growth of music which has taken
place in all our parish churches during the last
few years has called into existence a new class
of ' congregational ' settings of the Canticles,
under the name of Chant-services. The need of
them was felt a century ago, when 'Jackson in F,
their true forerunner, first appeared ; no wonder
that worshippers were glad on the one hand to
escape from the 'reading' of the Te Deum by
parson and clerk, and on the other hand from the
cathedral service in which they could take no
part. And it must be admitted also that the
weakest chant-service is an improvement on the
system of singing the canticles to single or double
chants. It would not be fair to criticise modern
chant-services ; their authors have produced
them as works of utility, not of art ; and their
need is still so pressing that composers of ability
who are willing to lay aside their own artistic
aims and don the strait-jacket of a congregation s
limited requirements and powers deserve all en
couragement and gratitude.
Instead of finding the terms 'chorus' and
SERVICE.
'solo' in the older services, we find 'full' and
' verse ' ; the former explains itself, but the latter
is curious, and the origin of its use in this sense
has never been satisfactorily explained. [See
VERSE.] [J.S.]
SESQUI. A Latin word, signifying, literally,
the whole plus its half.
In musical terminology, the prefix Sesqui is
used, in combination with certain numeral-adjec
tives, to express the Proportion, either of Har
monic Intervals or of rhythmic combinations.
[See PROPORTION.] Thus, Sesquialtera expresses
the Proportion of two to three, and therefore
represents the Perfect Fifth, which is produced
by sounding two-thirds of a given string. Sesqui-
tertia, expressing the Proportion of three to four,
represents the Perfect Fourth, sounded by three-
fourths of the string. Sesquiquarta, or four-fifths,
represents the Major Third. Sesquiquinta repre
sents the Minor Third, given by five-sixths of the
resonant string. Sesquisexta, six- sevenths, and
Sesquiseptima, seven-eighths, correspond with no
Intervals in the accepted Canon of the Scale :
but, Sesquioetava, or eight-ninths, represents the
peculiar form of the Major Second known to
Theorists as the Greater Tone ; and Sesquinona,
nine-tenths, gives the Lesser Tone — an Interval,
which, though conventionally called a Major
Second, and treated, in practice, as identical with
that just described, is less, by one Comma, than
the Tone represented by Sesquioetava.1
In rhythmic combinations, Sesquialtera is used
as the general symbol of Triple Time. The term
Sesquialtera is also applied to passages of three
notes sung against two; Sesqui terti a, to three
notes sung against four; and jSesquiquarta, to
four notes sung, or played, against five. [See
HBMIOLIA.] [W.S.R.]
SESQUIALTERA. A compound organ stop
consisting of several ranks of pipes, sometimes as
many as five. Various combinations of inter
vals are used, but they only represent different
positions of the 3rd, .sth, and 8th of the ground-
tone in the third or fourth octave above. The
Sesquialtera thus gives brilliancy to the tone by
reinforcing these upper partials.
The origin of the term Sesquialtera, as applied
to an organ stop, is rather obscure. In the list
of ratios given by Boethius, at the close of the
Jth or beginning of the 6th century, which were
exactly reproduced by almost every writer on
music up to the i6th century, the term pro-
portio Sesquialtera signifies numbers having the
ratio 2:3; the term therefore is really applic
able to all stops having pipes at an interval
of a fifth from the groundtone, such as the
Quint, Twelfth, Larigot (nineteenth), etc. As
stated above, the Sesquialtera organ stop does
actually contain pipes having this relation, only,
(it also contains pipes having the ratio 5 : 4
the tierce), which Boethius called a proportio
sesquiquarta. On the whole it may be safely said
that the word Sesquialtera was originally used
The Greater and Lesser Tones are, by some theorists, called the
wute and the Grave Major Second.
SESTET.
475
for the purpose of showing that the stop con
tained pipes having ratios other than 2 : i, or
other than an octave-series. [J.S.]
SESTET or SEXTET (Fr. Sextuor; Ital. Ses-
tetto). A composition for six instruments, or six
voices, with or without accompaniment.
Instrumental sestets are of two kinds ; those
for strings only, which belong to the same class as
string quartets and quintets, being monochromes
in six real parts, and those for various combin
ations of strings, wind and pianoforte, which
belong to the class of pianoforte quartets etc.,
and may be regarded as miniature symphonies.
The first of these two classes is, naturally, but
rarely met with, six-part harmony not being
easy to write ; but the few examples we have
are striking ones. We may pass over Haydn's
solitary specimen, called an 'Echo,' for 4 violins
and 2 cellos, and mention only that of Spohr, in
C (op. 140), a charming work ; the two immortal
compositions of Brahms (Bt>, op. 18 ; G, op. 36),
which stand at the head of modern chamber-
music ; the Sextet of Raff, op. 1 78, in G minor ;
and that of Dvorshak, recently introduced into
England. Raff's work deserves more than a
passing word, being one of that composer's most
carefully written productions. It is a veritable
triumph of counterpoint ; not only is the labour '
of 6-part writing never for a moment shirked,
but every device of imitation and canon is lav
ishly expended. One canon of 6 in 3 in the
variations is particularly happy.
All the above are for 2 violins, 2 violas and
a cellos. Turning now to the second and more
comprehensive class, we find a few more in point
of number but none of much artistic value. The
prolific Boccherini wrote sixteen, Haydn one,
Mozart only the 'Musical Joke.' Beethoven's
Sestet for Strings and 2 obligato Horns (op. Si 6)
is interesting, but unfortunately impracticable
for modern players.2 His Sestet for Wind In
struments, op. 71 (for 2 clarinets, 2 horns, and
2 bassoons, in Eb), is an early work and little
known. Beethoven himself mentions it in a
letter of August 8, 1809, as 'one of my earlier
things, and not only that, but written in a single
night; perhaps the only thing in its favour is
that it is the work of an author who has at least
brought forward better works — though for many
such works are the best.' (Nohl's Neue Briefe,
No. 53.) Sterndale Bennett's Sestet for Piano
and Strings a very early work (op. 8) is an elegant
pianoforte piece with an unimportant though
often picturesque accompaniment for strings, in
which the piano has, perhaps, an undue share
of work. Onslow left 2 sestets — ops. 30 and
77 bis.
It should be noticed that the sestets and quin
tets of Reicha and other composers, when written
for wind instruments only, are practically quar
tets, one or more of the instruments talcing a
rest in turn. [F.C.]
2 A 1st Horn part is in existence, on which Beethoven has written
' 6tet of mine. God knows where the other parts are." The slow move
ment has been adapted to voices as ' The Vesper Hymn,' and had a
wide popularity in ' Orpheus.'
476
SESTINI.
SESTINI, GIOVANNA, a singer engaged at the
Italian opera in London as prima buffa in 1783.
She first appeared in ' La Marchesa Giardiniera'
of Anfossi. Although the quality of her voice
was not agreeable (' gritty and sharp ' Lord
Mount-Edgecumbe describes it), and her vocalis
ation not of the first order, her beauty, vivacity,
and intelligence won for her great popularity
with the public. Kelly, who heard her at Dublin
in 1787, mentions her in his Reminiscences as the
best buffa of her time. She was 'first woman'
for many years, then, in the decline of her voice,
became second, and even after that sang at
intervals at Covent Garden and the Haymarket.
She was one of those useful people who are
ready at a moment's notice to take almost any
part, and up to 1791 was often recalled to
strengthen a weak company. She remained con
stantly in England, and died here at last, in
great poverty. Her salary for her first season
was £450.
One V. Sestini, possibly a relation, was ward
robe keeper at the King's Theatre in 1821, and
the name of Miss Sestini, a singer, appears in
some English playbills of 1839. [F.A.M.]
SETTIMETTO. Italian for a septet, or com
position for seven instruments, or in seven parts.
In the earlier programmes of the Philharmonic
Society, Beethoven's Septet is occasionally styled
Settimetto. [G.]
SEVEN LAST WORDS, THE— i. e. the
seven last sentences or exclamations of Christ :
— (i) 'Pater dimitte illis; non enim sciunt quid
faciant.' (2) 'Amen dico tibi, hodie mecum eris
in paradiso.' (3) ' Mulier ecce filius tuus, et tu
ecce mater tua.' (4)'Sitio.' (.5) 'Deusmeus, Deus
meus,ut quid dereliquisti me ? ' (6) 'Consummatum
est.' (7) ' Pater in manus tuas commendo spiritum
meum.' — A composition of Haydn's dating about
1785. It was then the custom in the principal
church of Cadiz to have a kind of oi'atorio during
Passion week.1 The church was hung with black,
and a single lamp only was lighted. At noon the
doors were shut. An orchestral prelude was
played ; then the Bishop mounted the pulpit, read
one of our Lord's last 'words/ and made an ex
hortation upon it. He then came down, and
threw himself on his knees before the altar.
During this there was again orchestral music.
He then mounted the pulpit a second time, and
pronounced the second ' word/ and a second dis
course, and so on till the last. In or about 1785
Haydn received a request from Cadiz to com
pose orchestral pieces for this purpose, each piece
to be an adagio of about 10 minutes long. This
he did, substituting however (as the original
parts show) for the Bishop's voice a long recita
tive for a bass in the case of each of the seven
' words.' In this form the work was performed
at Vienna, March 26, 1787, and was published
in parts by Artaria in the same year — as ' 7
senate, con un Introduzione, ed al fine un tere-
moto ' — for orchestra, op. 47 ; for strings, op. 48 ;
i This was done on Good Friday 1882, at St. John's Parish Church,
Worcester, England, by the incumbent, the Eev. Walter Carr.
SEVENTH.
for piano solo, op. 49. It quickly spread to other
countries, was sold to Forster of London in the
summer of the same year for 5 guineas, Haydn
protesting, and endeavouring to obtain another 5,
but with doubtful success ;2 and was announced
by Longman and Broderip in The Times of
Jan. i, 1788, as ' A set of Quartetts .... expres
sive of the Passion of Our Saviour, op. 48. 8s.'
Haydn himself conducted them (whether with
the recitatives or not and for full orchestra does
not appear) as the middle part of a concert at
the King's Theatre, Haymarket, May 30, 1791,
and repeated the performance at the benefit of
little Clement the violin-player. For the pay
ment for the Paris edition he waited long. At
last a .package arrived from the publisher con
taining a chocolate tart. After looking at it for
some time in disgust he broke off a piece for his
servant, when out ran a number of ducats !
The work is now known as a cantata, with
words to each movement. When or by whom
the words were added is not quite clear ; for the
various statements the reader must be referred
to Pohl's 'Joseph Haydn ' (ii. 217, 2i8).3 Pohl's
conclusion appears to be that Haydn adapted to
his music — perhaps with Van Swieten's assist
ance — words which he met with at Passau on
his way to England in 1 794, except those to the
Earthquake, which are from Earamler's 'Tod
Jesu.' At the same time he arranged each of
the ' words ' in plain harmony, and added a move
ment for wind instruments only between move
ments 4 and 5. The 'Seven Words' were for
long a favourite in Vienna both in church and
concert^room. One of the last performances was
at the Alt-Lerchenfeld church, when Franz
Schubert's brother Anton ('Father Hermann')
delivered the discourses.4 [G.]
SEVENTH. The intervals which contain
seven notes comprise some of the most important
chords in music, and such as have been pecu
liarly conspicuous in musical history. They are
divided mainly into three classes — major sevenths,
minor sevenths, and diminished sevenths ; as
I. The major sevenths, as CB, FE, GFjJ, are
very harsh — in fact the harshest combination used
in modern music except the minor second, such
as BC. 'They are only endurable either when
prepared and duly resolved, or when they result
from the use of an appoggiatura or grace-note,
or passing note. They occur most commonly as
suspensions, resolving either up or down, while
the rest of the chord is stationary, as at (a)
r
or with the condensed forms of resolution, when
2 Pohl, ' Haydn in London, p. 92.
3 The Biographic Universelle states categorically that the adapt
ation was by Michael Haydn.
•» See Pohl's ' Joseph Haydn,' ii. 214, 341, etc.
SEVENTH.
the rest of the chord moves simultaneously with
the motion of the discordant note, as at (6)
SEXT.
477
Of these major sevenths there are several
forms, but as they all have the same general
principles of formation and treatment they do
not require detailed consideration.
2. The minor sevenths are more individually
characteristic. Of these the most important is
the Dominant seventh, as at (e), for the key of C.
The discordance of this combination is very
slight. By itself it is but little more harsh than
some combinations which are universally ac
cepted as concords, such as the minor sixth ; but
its harshness is increased by the addition of the
other notes which fill up the harmony, as at (d),
since the indispensable major third in the chord
makes a diminished fifth with the seventh. Never
theless its mildness has long been recognised, and
it was used as early as the beginning of the iyth
century with greater freedom than any other
discord, by being relieved of the condition of
being prepared. [See HARMONY, vol. i. p. 674.]
But the laws of its resolution continued, and
still continue, more or less restricted. It natu
rally resolves into the Tonic chord ; because its
third is the leading note of the key and tends
to the Tonic ; its seventh naturally tends to the
third of the Tonic chord, which is in the major
divided from it only by the small interval of a
semitone ; and its root or bass note already
supplies the fifth of that chord, which naturally
acts as the connecting link between the two
harmonies of dominant and tonic ; so that all the
vital notes of the Tonic chord are as it were pre
dicted by its sounding, and consequently it is the
most natural and forcible penultimate in cadences,
in which it occurs with extreme frequency. [See
CADENCE; HARMONY.] It is hardly necessary
to point out that it can be resolved otherwise,
since it so often plays a part in interrupted
cadences ; as for instance where the Tonic chord
is supplanted by the chord of the Submediant
(e) ; but it is in consequence of the very pre
disposition which it creates to expect the Tonic
chord that interrupted cadences have such
marked effect. [See INTERRUPTED CADENCE.]
There is no other minor seventh in the key
which can be accompanied by a diatonic major
third; but there are two at least that can be
obtained with one chromatic note in them, and
these are so frequently used as if the}7 belonged
to the key that some theorists have agreed to
affiliate them. These are the minor seventh on
the supertonic with a chromatic major third, and
the minor seventh on the tonic, in which the
seventh itself is chromatic, as (/) and (#), in
relation to the key of C. These are respec
tively the dominant sevenths of the Dominant
and Subdominant keys, so that in any sense
they lie very close to the principal key, and can
resolve into it with the greatest ease ; and they
are often taken without preparation as distinct
ingredients of its harmonic material without
other reference to the keys to which they
diatonically belong.
The minor seventh on the supertonic, with a
diatonic minor third, is a chord which has much
exercised theorists. It comprises the same notes
as the chord which has been generally known
formerly and even partially now as the Added
sixth ; and it is more often met with in the
form from which that name was derived. But
in whatever position, it has long been peculiar
among discords for the variability of its reso
lution, since the note which would be the seventh
if the supertonic were at the bottom of the chord,
stands still in resolution almost as often as it
moves downwards to the conveniently contiguous
leading note of the key. For the various views
entertained concerning this chord, see HARMONY
and ROOT.
3. The chord of the Diminished seventh is
a familiar combination both to theorists and
musicians. It is in its complete form composed
of a set of minor thirds, and this as much as
anything gives it its notoriously ambiguous
character, since any of its elements can be treated
as the discordant note, with the result of leading
to a different key in each several case. It is now
commonly held to be the inversion of a minor ninth
with the root note omitted. [See DIMINISHED
INTERVALS, vol. i. p. 448.] [C.H.H.P.]
SEVERN, THOMAS HENRY — brother of Joseph
Severn the painter, the intimate friend of Keats,
Leigh Hunt, etc. — was born in London, Nov. 5,
1 80 1, and after many difficulties became manager
of Farn's music business at 72 Lombard Street.
He was the first conductor of the CITY OF LONDON
CLASSICAL HARMONISTS, started in 1831. [See
vol. i. 352 a.] He was virtually self-taught, and
his knowledge of music was derived from study
of the scores of the great masters, and from
practice. He died at Wandsworth, April 15,
1881. Severn was the author of an opera, and of
various songs which were very popular in their
time. Amongst these were two sets to words
by Haynes Bayley, ' Songs of the Boudoir,' con
taining the well-known ' We met, 'twas in a
crowd*; and 'Songs of the days of Chivalry';
also three songs by Herrick ; a Cantata, ' The
Spirit of the Shell ' ; two Te Deums (Novello &
Co.), etc., etc. [G.]
SEXT (Lat. Officium, (vel Oratio) ad Horam
Sextam ; Ad Sextam}. The last but one of the
'Lesser Hours' in the Roman Breviary.
The Office begins, as usual, with the Versicle,
and Response, 'Deus in adjutorium.' These are
followed by a Hymn — Rector potens, verax Deus
— which never changes; Verses 81-129 of the
Psalm, 'Beati immaculati,' sung in three divi
sions, but under a single Antiphon ; the ' Capitu-
lum ' and ' Responsorium breve ' for the Season ;
and the Prayer (or Collect) for the Day.
In Collegiate Churches, the Offices of Terce
478
SEXT.
and Sext, are usually sung immediately before
and after High Mass. The Plain Chaunt Music
for the various Offices is contained in the Anti-
phonarium Romanum, and the Directorium
Chori. [W.S.R.]
SEXTOLET (Fr. Sextolet ; Ger. Sextole ; Ital.
Sestina). A group of six notes of equal length,
played in the time of four ordinary notes of the
same species. To distinguish them from regular
notes of like form the number 6 is placed above
or below the group. The true sextolet is formed
from a triplet, by dividing each note into two,
thus giving six notes, the first of which alone is
accented; but there is also a similar group of six
notes, far more frequently used than the real
sextolet, in which a slight accent is given to the
fourth note as well as the first. This group,
which really consists of two triplets, is properly
known as the Double Triplet, and should be
marked with the figure 3 over the second and
fifth notes, though it is frequently marked with
6, and called a sextolet. The difference is well
shown in the following two extracts from the
Largo of Beethoven's Concerto in C, op. 15. [See
also TRIPLET.]
Double Triplets.
3,3
1 *~* T)m
**^ 3 3
. bph. m'f'm
\1 T^
&+-»-*-»-
UP ft
'
r'Hr T
j?uhu ' 1 i 1 i i i
=iSi
£=-^++-irf
S|£±z —
Sextokts —
r^rto:
2-6 K
n hi M. h»-L«ku,«tlh« ~* ***" "
7fcF~fr&JF=
i • v - \
U |
t/ ^_^— ' — ' — ^ — '
' ' =t=3=
~ — ' : : — —
[F.T.]
SEXTUS (Pars sexta, Sextuplum ; Eng. The
Sixth Voice, or Part). In the Part-Books of the
1 5th and i6th centuries, four Voices only were, as
a general rule, mentioned by name ; tbe Cantus,
Altus, Tenore, and Bassus. When a fifth Voice
was needed, it was called Quintus, or Pars Quinta,
and corresponded exactly, in compass, with one
of the first four. When yet another Voice was
added, it was called Sextus, or Pars Sexta ; and
corresponded in compass with another original
Voice-Part. The extra Part, therefore, repre
sented sometimes an additional Treble, sometimes
an Alto, sometimes a Tenor, and sometimes a
Bass ; and always corresponded, in compass,
with some other Part of equal importance with
itself. [W.S.R.]
SEYFRIED, IGNAZ XAVEB, RITTER VON,
born Aug. 15, 1776, in Vienna, was originally
intended for the law, but his talent for music
was so decided, that, encouraged by Peter Win
ter, he determined to become a professional
musician. In this, his intimacy with Mozart
and subsequent acquaintance with Beethoven
were of much use. His teachers were Kozeluch
SFORZANDO.
for the PF. and organ, and Haydn for theory.
In 1797 he became joint conductor of Schikane-
der's theatre with Henneberg, a post he retained
in the new Theater an der Wien, from its open
ing in 1 80 1 till 1826. The first work he pro
duced there was a setting of Schikaneder's comic
opera 'Der Lowenbrunnen ' (1797), and the
second, a grand opera ' Der Wundermann am
Rheinfall ' (i 799), on which Haydn wrote him a
very complimentary letter. These were suc
ceeded by innumerable operas great and small,
operettas, singspiele, music for melodramas, plays
(including some by Schiller and Grillparzer),
ballets, and pantomimes. Specially successful
were his biblical dramas, ' Saul, Konig von Is
rael' (1810), 'Abraham' (1817), 'DieMaccabaer,'
and 'Die Israeli ten in der Wtiste.' The music
to 'Ahasverus' (1823) he arranged from piano
pieces of Mozart's, and the favourite singspiel
'Die Ochsenmenuette ' (1823) (an adaptation of
Hofmann's vaudeville 'Le menuet du bceuf)
was a similar pasticcio from Haydn's works.
His church music, widely known and partly
printed, included many masses and requiems,
motets, offertoires, graduates, a 'Libera' for men's
voices composed for Beethoven's funeral, etc.
Seyfried also contributed articles to Schilling's
'Universal Lexikon der Tonkunst,' Schumann's
' Neue Zeitschrift fiir Musik,' the 'Leipziger
Allg. Zeitung,' and 'Cacilia,' besides editing
Albrechtsberger's complete works — the 'General-
bass-Schule,' ' Compositionslehre,' and a Supple
ment in 3 vols. on playing from score (Haslinger)
— and Beethoven's Studies in Counterpoint.
Herr Nottebohm's critical investigations have
reduced this last work to its proper value. [See
vol. i. 209 and ii. 479.]
Seyfried was elected an honorary or a corre
sponding member of innumerable musical socie
ties, at home and abroad. His pupils included
Louis Schlosser, Karl Krebs, Heinrich Ernst,
Skiwa, Baron Joseph Pasqualati, Carl Lewy,
Heissler, Kessler, J. Fischhof, Sulzer, Carl Has
linger, Parish-Alvars, R. Mulder, S. Kuhe,
Walther von Goethe, Baron Hermann LSwens-
kiold, F. von Suppe", Kohler, and Basadona.
His closing years were saddened by misfortune,
and his death took place Aug. 27, 1841. He
rests in the Wahringer cemetery (Ortsfriedhof),
near Beethoven and Schubert. [C.F.P.]
SFOGATO (open, airy), a word used in rare
instances by Chopin in certain of those little
cadenzas and ornaments that he is so fond of using,
to indicate what may be called his own peculiar
touch, a delicate and, as it were, ethereal tone,
which can only be produced upon the pianoforte,
and then only by performers of exceptional skill.
' Exhalation ' is the only word that conveys an
idea of this tone when it is produced. A ' Soprano
sfogato' is a thin, acute, voice. [J.A.F.M.]
SFORZANDO, SFORZATO, 'forced'; a
direction usually found in its abbreviated form sf.
or sfz. referring to single notes or groups of notes
which are to be especially emphasized. It is
nearly equivalent to the accent >, but is less apt
SFORZANDO.
SHAKE.
479
to be overlooked in performance, and is therefore
used in all important passages — as for instance,
in certain canons where the leading part has a
strongly accented note which is to be brought out
with equal force in the imitating part. Good in
stances occur in Beethoven's Sonata for violin and
piano in C minor, Op. 30, No. 2, in the trio of
the Scherzo ; in Schumann's Etudes Symphon-
iques Variations, etc. [J.A.F.M.]
SGAMBATI, GIOVANNI, a remarkable pianist
and composer, was born at Rome May 28, 1843.
His mother was English, the daughter of Joseph
Gott, sculptor, a native of London, who had for
many years practised his art in Rome. Giovanni
was intended for his father's profession, that of
an advocate, and would have been educated with
that view but for his strong turn for music.
After the death of the father in 1849 the
mother migrated with her two children to Trevi
in Umbria, where she married again. The boy
learned the piano and harmony from Natalucci,
a former pupil of Zingarelli's at the Conservatorio
of Naples ; and from the age of six often played
in public, sang contralto solos in church, con
ducted small orchestras, and was known as the
author of several sacred pieces. In the year
1860 he settled at Rome and soon became famous
for his playing, and for the classical character of
his programmes. His favourite composers were
Beethoven, Chopin, and Schumann, and he was
an excellent interpreter of the fugues of Bach
and Handel. Shortly after this he was on the
point of going to Germany to study, when Liszt's
arrival in Rome saved him from that necessity.
With him Sgambati worked long and diligently.
He soon began to give orchestral concerts, at
which the symphonies and concertos of the Ger
man masters were heard in Rome for the first
time under his baton. In 1864 he wrote a String
Quartet ; in 1866 a PF. Quintet (F minor, op. 4);
in 1867, an Octet, a second PF. Quintet (G minor,
op. 5), an Overture for full orchestra, to Cassa's
' Cola di Rienzi,' etc., etc. He conducted Liszt's
' Dante* Symphony at Rome, Feb. 26, 1866, with
great success and credit to himself. In 1869 Liszt
and he made a visit to Germany together, and
at Munich Sgambati heard Wagner's music for
the first time. In 1870 he published an album
of 5 songs (Blanchi), which was quickly followed
by other vocal pieces. Sgambati had for some
time attracted the notice of Herr von Keudell,
the well-known amateur, and Prussian Ambas
sador at Rome. At the orchestral concerts
which he conducted at the Embassy, several
of his works were first heard ; and there, in
1877, ne and his music first made the favour
able acquaintance of Wagner, through whose
recommendation the two quintets and other pieces
were published by Schotts of Mayence. En
couraged by this well-merited recognition he
composed a Prelude and Fugue for the PF. (op. 6),
a Festival Overture, a Concerto for PF. and or
chestra, a second String Quartet, various PF.
pieces, and a Symphony for full orchestra. The
symphony was produced at a concert in the
Quirinal, March 28, 1881, in presence of the
King and Queen of Italy, and other great
personages. Its success was great, and the King
conferred on Sgambati the order of the Crown of
Italy on the occasion. In 1882 he made his first
visit to England, and performed his PF. Concerto
at the Philharmonic of May II, and his Sym
phony at the Crystal Palace, June 10. Both
works were well received, but the symphony
made much the greater impression of the two.
Though original in ideas and character it adheres
to the established forms ; it is at once thought
fully worked out and gracefully expressed, with
a great deal of effect and no lack of counterpoint,
and it left a very favourable impression.
In 1869 Sgambati founded a free PF. class in
the Academy of St. Cecilia at Rome. This has
since been adopted as part of the foundation of
the Academy, and in 1878 he himself became
professor of the piano and a member of the
Direction.
The following list shows the chief of his pub
lished works to this date (July 1882).
Op. 1. Album of 5 songs (Blanchi).
2. Album of 10 songs (Kicordi).
3. Notturno,PF.(Mangantlll).
4. Quintet tor PF. and strings
(F minor).
5. Quintet ditto. (G minor).
6. Prelude and Fugue in Eb
minor, PF. solo.
7.
8.
Op. 9.
10. 2 Etudes for PF. solo ; 1
In Db ; 2 in Ft minor.
11.
12. Fogll volanti.
13.
14. Gavotte.
15. Concerto in G minor for
PF.
16. Symphony in D.
[G.]
SHAKE or TRILL (Fr. Trille, formerly
Tremblement, Cadence; Ger. Trille r; Ital. Trillo).
The shake, one of the earliest in use among the
ancient graces, is also the chief and most frequent
ornament of modern music, both vocal and in
strumental. It consists of the regular and rapid
alternation of a given note with the note above,
such alternation continuing for the full duration,
of the written note.
The shake is the head of a family of orna
ments, all founded on the alternation of a principal
note with a subsidiary note one degree either
above or below it, and comprising the Mordent
and PralUriller [see MORDENT] still in use, and the
RIBATTUTA (Ger. Zuriickschlag) and Battement1
(Ex. i), both of which are now obsolete.
1. Batlement.
Ribattuta.
etc.
The sign of the shake is in modern music ir.
(generally followed by a waved line ~ - if over
a long note), and in older music tr. *~, ~~, and
occasionally 4- , placed over or under the note ;
and it is rendered in two different ways, begin
ning with either the principal or the upper note,
as in example 2 : —
1 Rousseau (Diet, de Musique) describes the Battement as a trill
which differed from the ordinary trill or cadence only in beginning
with the principal instead of the subsidiary note. In this he is
certainly mistaken, since the battement is described by all other
writers as an alternation of the principal note with the note below.
480
2. Written.
O tr_
SHAKE.
Performed,
Or thus.
•-
These two modes of performance differ con
siderably in effect, because the accent, which is
always perceptible, however slight it may be, is
given in the one case to the principal and in the
other to the subsidiary note, and it is therefore
important to ascertain which of the two methods
should be adopted in any given case. The
question has been discussed with much fervour
by various writers, and the conclusions arrived at
have usually taken the form of a fixed adherence
to one or other of the two modes, even in appa
rently unsuitable cases. Most of the earlier
masters, including Emanuel Bach, Marpurg, Ttirk,
etc., held that all trills should begin with the
upper note, while Hummel, Czerny, Moscheles,
and modern teachers generally (with some ex
ceptions) have preferred to begin on the principal
note. This diversity of opinion indicates two
different views of the very nature and meaning
of the shake ; according to the latter, it is a trem
bling or pulsation — the reiteration of the prin
cipal note, though subject to continual momentary
interruptions from the subsidiary note, gives a
certain undulating effect not unlike that of the
tremulant of the organ ; according to the former,
the shake is derived from the still older appoqgia-
tura, and consists of a series of appoggiaturas
with their resolutions — is in fact a kind of elabo
rated appoggiatura, — and as such requires the
accent to fall upon the upper or subsidiary note.
This view is enforced by most of the earlier
authorities ; thus Marpurg says, ' the trill derives
its origin from an appoggiatura ( Vorschlag von
oben) and is in fact a series of descending ap
poggiaturas executed with the greatest rapidity.'
And Emanuel Bach, speaking of the employment
of the shake in ancient (German) music, says
'formerly the trill was usually only introduced
after an appoggiatura,' and he gives the following
example —
.3. , tr
Nevertheless, the theory which derives the
shake from a trembling or pulsation, and there
fore places the accent on the principal note, in
which manner most shakes in modern music are
executed, has the advantage of considerable, if
not the highest antiquity.1 For Caccini, in his
Singing School (published 1601), describes the
trillo as taught by him to his pupils, and says
that it consists of the rapid repetition of a single
note, and that in learning to execute it the
singer must begin with a crotchet and strike
each note afresh upon the vowel a (ribattere
ciascuna nota con la gola, sopra la vocale a).
Curiously enough he also mentions another grace
i The exact date of the introduction of the trill is not known, but
Consorti, a celebrated singer (1590), is said to have been the first who
could sing a trill. (Schilling, ' Lexikon der Tonkunst.')
SHAKE.
which he calls Gruppo, which closely resembles
the modern shake.
4. Trillo,
i
...
Gruppo.
±-4-(-H
-H-H-
•^•••••* • ^•^•-•g-j
And Playford, in his 'Introduction to the Skill
of Musick ' (1655) quotes an anonymous treatise
on ' the Italian manner of singing,' in which
precisely the same two graces are described.2
Commenting on the shake Playford says, 'I
have heard of some that have attained it after
this manner, in singing a plain-song of six notes
up and six down, they have in the midst of every
note beat or shaked with their finger upon their
throat, which by often practice came to do the
same notes exactly without.' It seems then clear
that the original intention of a shake was to
produce a trembling effect, and so the modern
custom of beginning with the principal note may
be held justified.
In performing the works of the great masters
from the time of Bach to Beethoven then, it
should be understood that, according to the rule
laid down by contemporary teachers, the shake
begins with the upper or subsidiary note, but it
would not be safe to conclude that this rule is to
be invariably followed. In some cases we find
the opposite effect definitely indicated by a small
note placed before the principal note of the shake,
and on the same line or space, thus —
5. MOZART (ascribed to), ' Fne fievre,' Var. 3.
tr tr
and even when there is no small note it is no
doubt correct to perform all shakes which are
situated like those of the above example in the
same manner, that is, beginning with the principal
note. So therefore a shake at the commencement
of a phrase or after a rest (Ex. 6), or after a
downward leap (Ex. 7), or when preceded by a
note one degree below it (Ex. 8), should begin
on the principal note.
6. BACH, Prelude No. 16, Vol. i.
tr
MOZART, Concerto in Bb.
Andante IM_^_ •_•_« ?r
BACH, Art of Fugue, No. 8.
2 The author of this treatise is said by Playford to have been a
pupil of the celebrated Scipione della Palla, who was also Caccinl's
master.
SHAKE.
SHAKE.
481
8. BACH, Sonata for PF. and Flute, No. 6.
tr
L=:
V&
It is also customary to begin with the principal
note when the note bearing the shake is preceded
by a note one degree above it (Ex. 9), especially
if the tempo be quick (Ex. 10), in which case
the trill resembles the Pralltriller or inverted
mordent, the only difference being that the three
notes of whicli it is composed are of equal length,
instead of the last being the longest (see vol. ii,
P- 364)-
BACH, Organ Fugue in F.
"
1 — r
£§£
•&• ^_
gg=B
10.
Allegro.
MOZAHT, Sonata in F.
lr Played.
If however the note preceding the shake is
slurred to it (Ex. II a), or if the trill note is pre
ceded by an appoggiatura (Ex. n 6), the trill
begins with the upper note ; and this upper note
is tied to the preceding note, thus delaying the
entrance of the shake in a manner precisely
similar to the ' bound Pralltriller ' (see vol. ii.
p. 364, Ex. 13). A trill so situated is called in
German der gebundene Triller (the bound trill).
11. (a) BACH, Concerto for two Pianos.
tr
(b) HAYDN, Trio in E minor.
When the note carrying a shake is preceded
by a short note of the same name (Ex, 12), the
upper note always begins, unless the anticipating
note is marked staccato (Ex. 1 3), in which case
the shake begins with the principal note.
12.
BACH, Chromatic Fantasia.
fc. tr tr
acE /*- -m
• -
i
fvU * f
* i
§ • • .
1
!
SiU — 1
(— — i
L_J
-P
p
^j
-!
""
VOL.111. PT. 3.
MOZART, Sonata in C minor.
13. Played.
M«r t^r . M'
In modern music, when a trill beginning with
the subsidiary note is required, it is usually indi
cated by a small grace-note, written immediately
before the trill-note (Ex. 14). This grace-note
is occasionally met with in older music (see de
menti, Sonata in B minor), but its employment
is objected to by Turk, Marpurg, and others, as
liable to.be confused with the real appoggiatura
of the bound trill, as in Ex. ii. This objection
does not hold in modern music, since the bound
trill is no longer used.
BEETHOVEN, Sonata, Op. £3, Finale.
14. } *tr
n * 4
-etc.
Immediately before the final note of a shake a
new subsidiary note is generally introduced, situ
ated one degree below the principal note. This
and the concluding principal note together form
what is called the turn of the shake, though the
name is not strictly appropriate, since it properly
belongs to a separate species of ornament of which
the turn of a shake forms in fact the second half
only.1 [See TURN.] The turn is variously indi
cated, sometimes by two small grace-notes (Ex.
15), sometimes by notes of ordinary size (Ex. 16),
and in old music by the signs of a vertical stroke,
a small curve in a downward direction, or a
regular turn, added to the ordinary sign, of the
trill (Ex. 1 7),
CLEMENT:, Sonata in C.
16.
HANDEL, Gigue (Suite 14).
tr tr
For the sake of smoothness, it is necessary
that the note immediately preceding the turn
should be a principal note. In the shake begin
ning with the upper note this is the case as a
matter of course (Ex. 18), but in the modern
shake an extra principal note has to be added to
the couple of notes which come just before the
turn, while the speed of the three is slightly
quickened, thus forming a triplet (Ex. 19).
i The turn of a trill is better described by its German name
NachsMag, or after-beat.
Ii
482
Written.
SHAKE.
Played.
39. Written.
Played.
Sometimes the turn is not indicated at all, but
it has nevertheless to be introduced if the shake
is followed by an accented note (Ex. 20). If
however the next following note is unaccented,
no turn is required, but an extra principal note
is added to the last couple of notes, that the trill
may end as well as begin with the principal
note (Ex. 21). When the trill is followed by
a rest, a turn is generally made, though it is
perhaps not necessary unless specially indicated
(Ex. 22).
MOZART, ' Lison dormait,' Var. 8.
tr , Played.
m
— 1
CLEMENTI, Sonata in G.
tr =*'"T
BEETHOVEN, Trio, Op. 97.
When a note ornamented by a shake is followed
by another note of the same pitch, the lower
subsidiary note only is added to the end of the
shake, and the succeeding written note serves to
complete the turn. This lower note is written
sometimes as a small grace-note (Ex. 23), some
times as an ordinary note (Ex. 24), and is some
times not written at all, but is nevertheless intro
duced in performance (Ex. 25).
BEETHOVEN, Concerto in Eb.
j«
23.
CLEMENTI, Sonata in A.
MOZART, ' Salve tu, Domine.' Var. 4 (Cadenza).
tr
£
Even when the trill-note is tied to the next
following, this extra lower note is required, pro
vided the second written note is short, and occurs
on an accented beat (Ex. 26). If the second
note is long, the two tied notes are considered as
SHAKE.
forming one long note, and the shake is therefore
continued throughout the whole value.
BACH, Fugue No. i£, Vol. 2.
26.
Ir
Very similar is the rendering of a shake on a
dotted note : — the turn ends on the dot, which
thus takes the place of the second of the two
notes of the same pitch. Thus the effect of the
two modes of writing shown in Ex. 27 a and b,
would be the same, If, however, the dotted note
is followed by a note a degree lower, no turn is
required (Ex. 28).
27 HANDEL, Suite 10. Allemande.
('•') tr ,. tr tr tr (&) tr , tr
HANDEL, Suite 10. Allegro.
Played.
Trills on very short notes require no turn, but
consist merely of a triplet — thus,
MOZART, ' Ein Weib.' Var. 6,
tr tr tr tr
Besides the several modes of ending a shake,
the commencement can also be varied by the
addition of what is called the upper or lower
prefix. The upper prefix is not met with in
modern music, but occurs frequently in the works
of Bach and Handel. Its sign is a tail turned
upwards from the beginning of the ordinary trill
mark, and its rendering is as follows —
BACH, Partita No. i, Sarabande.
The lower prefix consists of a single lower sub
sidiary note prefixed to the first note of a shake
which begins with the principal note, or of two
notes, lower and principal, prefixed to the first
note of a shake beginning with the upper note.
It is indicated in various ways, by a single small
grace-note (Ex. 31), by two (Ex. 32), or three
grace-notes (Ex. 33), and in old music by a tail
turned downwards from the commencement of
the trill mark (Ex. 34), the rendering in all cases
being that shown in Ex. 35.
SHAKE.
From a composer's habit of writing the lower
prefix with one, two, or three notes, his inten
tions respecting the commencement of the or
dinary shake without prefix, as to whether it
should begin with the principal or the subsidiary
note, may generally be inferred. For since it
would be incorrect to render Ex. 32 or 33 in the
manner shown in Ex. 36, which involves the
repetition of a note, and a consequent break of
legato — it follows that a composer who chooses
the form Ex. 32 to express the prefix intends the
shake to begin with the upper note, while the
use of Ex. 33 shows that a shake beginning with
the principal note is generally intended.
36. (Ex. 32.)
That the form Ex. 31 always implies the shake
beginning with the principal note is not so clear
(although there is no doubt that it usually does
so), for a prefix is possible which leaps from the
lower to the upper subsidiary note. This ex
ceptional form is frequently employed by Mozart,
and is marked as in Ex. 37. It bears a close
resemblance to the Double Appoggiatura. [See
that word, vol. i. p. 79.]
MOZART, Sonata in F. Adagio.
tr
Among modern composers, Chopin and Weber
almost invariably write the prefix with two notes
(Ex. 32) ; Beethoven uses two notes in his ear
lier works (see Op. 2, No. 2, Largo, bar 10), but
afterwards generally one (see Op. 57).
The upper note of a shake is always the next
degree of the scale above the principal note, and
may therefore be either a tone or a semitone dis
tant from it, according to its position in the scale.
In the case of modulation, the shake must be
made to agree with the new key, independently
of the signature. Thus in the second bar of Ex.
38, the shake must be made with Bt} instead of
Bb, the key having changed from C minor to C
major. Sometimes such modulations are indi
cated by a small accidental placed close to the
sign of the trill (Ex. 39).
CHOPIN, Ballade, Op. 67.
38.
SHAKE.
BEETHOVEN, Choral Fantasia.
483
*A-
*3
-• •
• ' • ' • 0 ' 0 0
y ; C a~
:p33£
The lower subsidiary note, whether employed
in the turn or as prefix, is usually a semitone
distant from the principal note (Ex. 40), unless
the next following written note is a whole tone
below the principal note of the shake (Ex. 41).
In this respect the shake follows the rules which
govern the ordinary turn. [See TURN.]
BEETHOVEN, Sonata, Op. 10, No. 2.
,tr
£
41.
MOZART, Rondo in D.
-^
A series of shakes ascending or descending
either diatonically or chromatically is called a
Chain of Shakes (Ital. Catena di Trille ; Ger.
TrillerJcette). Unless specially indicated, the
last shake of the series is the only one which
requires a turn. Where the chain ascends dia
tonically, as in the first bar of Ex. 42, each shake
must be completed by an additional principal
note at the end, but when it ascends by the
chromatic alteration of a note, as from GU to Gj,
or from A to AJJ, in bar 2 of the example, the
same subsidiary note serves for both principal
notes, and the first of such a pair of shakes re
quires no extra principal note to complete it.
BEETHOVEN, Concerto in Eb.
tr
etc.
In pianoforte music, a shake is frequently made
to serve as accompaniment to a melody played
by the same hand. When the melody lies near
to the trill-note there need be no interruption to
the trill, and either the principal or the subsi
diary note (Hummel prescribes the former,
Czerny the latter) is struck together with each
note of the melody (Ex. 43). But when the
melody lies out of reach, as is often the case, a
single note of the shake is omitted each time a
melody-note is struck (Ex. 44). In this case
484
SHAKE.
SHAKESPEARE.
the accent of the shake must bfi upon the upper
note, that the note omitted may be a subsidiary
and not a principal note.
43. CRAMER, Study. No. n.
H Lento
-— Hh
1 N 1
j ' * J -
m— -» — !
L>
tr.
Played.
etc.
BEETHOVEN, Sonata. Op. 109.
44.
etc.
The above arrangement constitutes what is
called a false trill, the effect of a complete trill
being produced in spite of the occasional omission
of one of the notes. There are also other kinds
of false trills, intended to produce the effect of
real ones, when the latter would be too difficult.
Thus Ex. 45 represents a shake in thirds, Ex.
46 a shake in octaves, and Ex. 47 a three-part
shake in sixths.
MENDELSSOHN, Concerto in D minor.
45. tr tr
ti£±^
^-
^z:
LISZT, Transcription of Mendelssohn's 'Wedding March.'
46. JL JL JL JL JL JL j
t- -•-
r r
-Jf- _ _ _— .. •• • f "M~'"M~
-m+
-| ,
f{\\ {j
-f '
\^y ' P !
1
l j
b'^JG> . -*- •
-m-
-Jf*
p k«— — p r
JL JL JL JL JL
— * 1 p
M
^^^
^=
•^••1
1 1_
— 1 — 1 —
•
1
»—
— 1= £•- — f=
MULLER, Caprice Op. 29, No. 2.
The above method of producing a shake in three
parts is generally resorted to when great force is
required, otherwise the ordinary method is quite
practicable, and both double and triple shakes
are frequently met with in modern brilliant music
(Ex. 48, 49).
CHOPIN, Polonaise, Op. 25.
S
^
fr.
BEETHOVEN, Polonaise. Op. 89.
tr.
-£2-
m
The speed of a shake cannot be exactly defined
in notes, since it is usually better, except in the
case of very short trills (as in Ex. 29), that the
notes of the shake should bear no definite propor
tion to the value of the written note. Generally,
the shake should be as rapid as is consistent with
distinctness. When a proportional shake is re
quired it is usually written out in full, as at the
end of the Adagio of Beethoven's Sonata in Eb,
Op. 27, No. i. [F.T.]
SHAKESPEARE, WILLIAM, composer, vocal
ist, pianist, born at Croydon June 16, 1849. At
the age of 13 he was appointed organist at the
church where formerly he had attracted attention
in the choir. In 1 862 he commenced a three years
course of study of harmony and counterpoint
under Molique ; but after that master's death,
having in 1866 gained the King's Scholarship
at the Royal Academy of Music, continued his
studies there for five years under Sir W. Sterndale
Bennett. Whilst at the Royal Academy he pro
duced and performed at the students' concerts a
pianoforte sonata, a pianoforte trio, a caprido for
pianoforte and orchestra, and a pianoforte con
certo ; and attracted some notice as a solo-player.
He was elected Mendelssohn Scholar in 1871,
for composition and pianoforte-playing, and in
accordance with the wish of the Committee en
tered the Conservator! um at Leipzig. There,
whilst under the instruction of the director, Carl
Reinecke, he produced and conducted in the
Gewandhaus a symphony in C minor. Having
discovered himself to be the possessor of a tenor
voice, he was sent by the Mendelssohn Scholar
ship Committee to study singing with Lamperti at
Milan, and there remained for two and a half years.
But though singing was his chief pursuit he did not
neglect composition, and while in Italy wrote two
overtures, two string quartets, and other works.
In 1875 he returned to England, and entered
upon the career of a concert and oratorio singer.
He was appointed in 1878 Professor of Singing,
and in 1880 conductor of the concerts, at the
Royal Academy of Music.
SHAKESPEAKE.
His voice, though both sweet and sympathetic
in quality, is somewhat deficient in power ; and
his success as a singer must therefore be attri
buted to the purity of his vocal production and
to his complete mastery of all styles of music.
His compositions, which are marked by con
siderable charm and elegance, show the influence
of Schumann and Bennett ; and in his Overture,
performed at the Crystal Palace in 1874, and
his Pianoforte Concerto, at the Brighton Festival
of 1879, he proves himself an adept at musical
form. ' [J.C.G.]
SHARP (Diesis, from Lat. Divisio; Fr. Diese}.
The term which expresses the raising of a note
by a less quantity than a whole tone. F sharp
is half a tone higher than F natural : a singer
' sang sharp ' — that is, sang slightly higher than
the accompaniment ; ' the pitch was sharpened '
— that is, was slightly raised.
The sign for a sharp in practical music is £ ; for
a double sharp, two half tones, x . In French
the same signs are used, but the raised note is
entitled diese — Fa diese, R<$ diese, etc. ; in Ger
man Fis, Dis, etc., just as Eb, Gb are designated
Es, Ges, and so on.
The sign is said to have originated l in the
fact that in the i5th and i6th centuries the tone
was divided into five intervals, which were de
signated by x , # , $ , Hji, according to the number
of parts represented by each. These gradually
fell into disuse, and the second alone remained.
In the printed music of the I7th century how
ever the sign is usually % .
In Germany the sign was used to express the
major mode, CjJ meaning C major, AJJ, A major,
and so forth. Thus Beethoven has inscribed the
overture to Leonora known as ' No. I ' (which is
in the key of C) with the words ' Ouvertura in
Cfl, Characteristische Ouverture.' The Eroica
Symphony, in Eb, was even announced in the
programme of Clement's Concert, April 7, 1805,
as ' Eine neue grosse Sinfonie in Dis' (i.e. DjJ). In
stances of the practice are frequent in the Index
to the ' Allgemeine musikalische Zeitung.' [G.]
SHAW, MART (Mrs. ALFRED SHAW), daughter
of John Postans, messman at the Guard Room,
St. James's Palace, was born in 1814. She was a
student at the Royal Academy of Music from Sept.
1828 to June 1831, and afterwards a pupil of Sir
George Smart. Miss Postans appeared in public as
a contralto singer in 1834, an^ at the Amateur
Musical Festival in Exeter Hall in November of
that year attracted great attention by the beauty
of her voice and the excellence of her style. In
1835 sne was engaged at the Concert of Ancient
Music and the York Festival, and about the end
of the year became the wife of Alfred Shaw, an
artist of some repute. In 1836 she appeared at
the Charing Cross Hospital Festival at Exeter
Hall, and at the Norwich and Liverpool Festivals,
at the latter of which she sang the contralto part
in Mendelssohn's ' St. Paul ' on its first perform
ance in England. In 1837 she was engaged at
the Philharmonic and Sacred Harmonic Societies
i See Mendel's Lexicon, under ' Diesis.'
SHAWM.
485
and Birmingham Festival. In 1838, after ful
filling an engagement at Gloucester Festival, she
quitted England and appeared at the Gewandhaus
concerts, Leipzig, under Mendelssohn. A letter
from him to the Directors of the Philharmonic
Society — Leipzig, Jan. 19, 1839 — speaks of Clara
Novello and Mrs. Shaw as 'the best concert-
singers we have had in this country for a long
time.' From Germany she proceeded to Italy,
and appeared at La Scala, Milan, Nov. 17, 1839,
in Verdi's opera, 'Oberto.' She returned to*
England in 1842 and appeared at Covent Garden
in opera with Adelaide Kemble, and in 1843 at
the Sacred Harmonic Society in oratorio with
Clara Novello, and afterwards at Birmingham
Festival. She had now reached the zenith of
her reputation, when her career was suddenly
arrested by a heavy visitation. Her husband
became deranged, and the calamity so seriously
shocked her whole system that the vocal organs
became affected and she was unable to sing in
tune. She then resorted to teaching, for three
or four years appearing in public at an annual
benefit concert. After her husband's death she
married John Frederick Robinson, a country
solicitor, and retired from the profession. She
died at her husband's residence, Hadleigh Hall,
Suffolk, Sept. 9,1876, after suffering for three years
from ' malignant disease of the breast.' [W.H.H.]
SHAWM or SHALM (Germ. Schalmey or
Chalmei ; Fr. Chalumeau}.
The name of this ancient instrument is variously
derived from the Latin Calamus, Calamellus, 'a
reed,' or from the German schallen, 'to sound.*
The <rvpiy£ of the Greeks, supposed by Bernsdorff
and others to be identical with it, is shown by
Mr. Chappell2 to have been the Pandean pipe.
Under the names of Pommer and Bombard
smaller and larger forms were known in Germany;
the latter, also called the Brummer, developing
into the Bassoon. [See BASSOON.] It was clearly
a reed instrument like the shepherd's pipe, al
though Mr. Chappell thinks it more closely allied
to the modern clarinet. The older dictionaries
define it as ' a hautboy or cornet,' and it is so
frequently associated with the bagpipe that there
must evidently have been some affinity between
the two instruments. For instance, we find in
Clement Marot, i. 166,
Faisoit sonner Ckalumeaux et Cornemuses ;
and again, Dray ton, ' Polyolbion,' iv.
Even from the shrillest Shawme vinto the Cornamute.
This combination of the pastoral oboe with the
bagpipe may be daily seen in the streets. [See
PlFFERARO.]
Another similarity between the shawm and
the bagpipe, as also between it and the musette,
is noted by Schladebach in describing the Schalmey
or Schalmei. He states that it is still played
under this name by the peasants of the Tyrol
and of Switzerland, and that the reed, instead of
being inserted directly into the player's lips, is
fitted into a box or ' capsule ' with a mouthpiece,
2 History of Music, vol. i. p. 259.
486
SHAWM.
wherein it vibrates unconstrained. This is ex
actly the device still retained in the bagpipe, and
nowhere else. It possesses, according to the same
writer, six holes for the three middle fingers oi
either hand, with a single hole covered by means
of a key for the right little finger. This would
give the scale of the musette or shepherd's pipe.
The chief interest of the name is due to its use
in the Prayer-book version of Psalm xcviii. 7,
' With trumpets also and shawms, 0 shew your
selves joyful before the Lord the King.' The
Authorised Version gives this 'With trumpets
and sound of cornet.' Dr. Stainer, in ' The Music
of the Bible,' argues that the former of these at
least is a mistranslation. The original Hebrew
words are chatsotsroth and shophar. The passage
is translated in the Septuagint lv ffd\irtygiv l\a-
Tafj KO.I (fxavfj od\iriyyos KfpaTivrjs, and in the
Vulgate 'in tubis ductilibus.et voce tubae cornese.'
The chatsotsrah is obviously the trombone, which
it will be shown by other evidence is of extreme
antiquity ; the shophar is in both Greek and
Latin versions described as the ' horn-trumpet
or ramshorn,' well known to have been used
in Jewish festivals, whence in Numbers xxix. i
a feast day is called 'a day of blowing the
trumpets,' and in Joshua vi. 4 ' seven trumpets oi
ramshorns ' are minutely described as preceding
the Ark. [W.H.S.]
SHEPHERD'S PIPE. A name given to the
pastoral oboe or musette. It was an instrument
with a double reed like that of the bagpipe
chaunter; and seems occasionally to have been
combined with a windbag as in the latter instru-
, ment. It was made in several sizes, constituting
a family or ' consort ' similar to the viols, re
corders, and other instruments. Its origin in the
simple reed is well given in Chappell's ' History
of Music,' vol. i. p. 259.
An excellent drawing of its various forms,
with the method of holding it, is to be found in a
' Traite' de la Musette ' by Jean Girin of Lyon,
I572> where it is distinguished from the 'Cro-
morne ' and ' Hautbois.' The bagpipe form with
drones and windbag is also engraved, and inter
esting details are given as to celebrated makers ;
many of whom, like the 'luthiers' of Cremona,
seem to have handed down their reputation to
their descendants. It appears to have had six
holes, and the rudimentary scale and compass of
the Oboe ; though, of course when played from,
a bag, and not with the lips, the upper harmonic
register must have been deficient. [W.H.S.]
SHEPPARD, or SHEPHERD, JOHN, Mus.
Bac., born in the early part of the i6th century,
was a chorister of St. Paul's under Thomas
Mulliner. In 1542 he was appointed Instructor
of the choristers and organist of Magdalen Col
lege, Oxford, which office he resigned in 1543,
was reappointed to it in 1545, and held it
until 1547. He was a Fellow of the College
from 1549 to 1551. On April 21, 1554, having
then been a student in music for 20 years, he
supplicated for the degree of Mus. Doc., but it
does not appear whether he obtained it. John
SHIELD.
Day's ' Morning and Evening Prayer,' etc., 1560,
contains two Anthems, a 4, by him — ' I give you
a new commandment,' and 'Submit yourselves.'
The former is reprinted in the { Parish Choir.'
Another book of Day's, the ' Whole Psalms in
foure parts,' 1563, has a 'Prayer' by him, '0
Lord of hostes.' Hawkins prints a motet in 3
parts by him ' Steven first after Christ for Gods
worde his blood spent,' and a melodious little
' Poynte ' — a fugal piece for 4 voices of 7 bars
length. Burney (ii. 565) complains that the mo
tet is not a good specimen, and prints another,
'Esurientes,' for 5 voices from the Christ Church
MSS., on which he pronounces Shepherd to have
been superior to any composer of the reign of
Henry VIII. Much of his church music is pre
served in the Music School, Oxford ; an Anthem
and 39 Latin Motets and a Pavin and Galliard
for the lute are among the MSS. at Christ Church,
Oxford. In the British Museum (Add. MSS.
15166, 29289, 30480) are treble parts of many
of his English compositions, amongst them 2 M.
and E. Services with Creed ; 2 Te Deums and
Magnificats, 2 Creeds, and 7 Anthems. The
Add. MSS. 4900, 29246, contain 4 pieces with
lute accompaniment, and Add. MSS. 17802-5
has no less than 4 Masses — 'The western wynde,'
'The French Masse,' 'Be not afraide,' and 'Playn
song Mass for a Mene ' ; 4 Alleluias, and 10 Latin
Motets, all for 4 voices complete. The library of
the Sacred Harmonic Society (no. 1737) possesses
4 Latin motets, and (no. 1642) a 'First Service'
by him. Morley in his 'Introduction' includes
him amongst ' famous Englishmen.' The date of
his death is unknown.
Another John Shepherd, possibly a son of the
above, was sworn a Gentleman of the Chapel
Royal, Dec. i, 1606. (Rimbault's Old Cheque
book, p. 43). Perhaps it was he who added a
Kyrie to J ohnson's service in G, in the Cathedral
Library, Ely. (See Dickson's Catalogue, 32, 37.)
Perhaps, also, he is the ' Thos. Shepherd' of
Tudway (iv. 72). [W.H.H.]
SHERRINGTON, Mme. LEMMENS-. [See
LEMMENS, vol. ii. p. 120.]
SHERRINGTON, JOSE, younger sister of
Mme. Lemmens-Sherrington, born at Rotterdam
Oct. 27, 1850 ; studied at Brussels under Mad.
Meyer-Boulard and Signor Chiriamonte, and
soon showed a gift for florid singing, and a very
fine shake. In 1871 she appeared in London
and the Provinces, under the auspices of her
sister. In 1873 made a tour in Holland, and
then returned to this country, where she has since
established herself as a concert singer, and is in
much request. Though gifted with much dramatic
talent Miss Jose Sherrington has never appeared
in public on the stage. Her voice is a good soprano
reaching from A below the stave to E in alt. [G.]
SHIELD, WILLIAM, son of a singing-master,
was born in 1748 at S wall well, Durham. He
received his first musical instruction, when 6 years
old, from his father, but losing his parent three
years later, he was apprenticed to a boat-builder
at North Shields. His master however per-
SHIELD.
mitted him to pursue his musical studies, and
he obtained some lessons in thorough-bass from
Charles Avison, and occasionally played the
violin at music meetings in the neighbourhood.
On the expiration of his apprenticeship, having
acquired sufficient knowledge to lead the sub
scription concerts at Newcastle, he determined
upon making music his profession, and removed
to Scarborough, where he became leader at the
theatre and concerts. Whilst there he produced
his first composition, an anthem for the opening
of a new church at Sunderland. Having been
heard by Fischer and Borghi, they recommended
him to Giardini, by whom he was engaged in
1772 as a second violin in the Opera band. In
1773 he was promoted to the post of principal
viola — the favourite instrument of composers —
which he held for 1 8 years, and which he also
filled at all the principal concerts. In 1778 he
produced, at the Haymarket, his first dramatic
piece, the comic opera 'The Flitch of Bacon.'
This led to his being engaged as composer to.
Covent Garden Theatre, a post which he occu
pied until his resignation, 1791. During his en
gagement he composed many operas and other
pieces. In 1791 he made the acquaintance of
Haydn, and was wont to say that in four days,
during which he accompanied Haydn from London
to Taplow and back, he gained more knowledge
than he had done by study in any four years of
his life. In the same year he visited France and
Italy. In 1792 he was re-engaged as composer
at Covent Garden, in which capacity he acted
until 1797- In 1807 he gave up all connection
with the theatre.
He published at various times, ' A Collection of
Favourite Songs, To which is added a Duet for
two Violins ' ; ' A Collection of Canzonets and an
Elegy'; and 'A Cento, consisting of Ballads,
Eounds, Glees, etc.' ; likewise ' Six Trios for two
Violins and Bass,' and ' Six Duos for two Violins.'
He was also author of ' An Introduction to Har
mony,' 1794 and 1800; and 'Rudiments of
Thorough Bass.' His dramatic compositions, con
sisting of operas, musical farces, and pantomimes,
were as follow: — 1778, 'The Flitch of Bacon';
1782, '^Lord Mayor's Day'; 1783, 'The Poor
Soldier,' ' Rosina,' ' Friar Bacon ' ; 1 784, ' Robin
Hood,' 'The Noble Peasant,' 'Fontainbleau,'
'The Magic Cavern'; 1785, 'Love in a Camp,'
•The Nunnery,' 'The Choleric Fathers,' 'Omai';
1786, 'Richard Coeur de Lion,' 'The Enchanted
Castle'; 1787, 'The Farmer'; 1788, 'The High
land Reel,' 'Marian,' 'The Prophet,' 'Aladdin';
1790, 'The Crusade,' 'The Picture of Paris';
1791, 'The Woodman,' 'Oscar and Malvina' (part
only) [see REEVE, WILLIAM]; 1792, 'Hartford
Bridge,' 'Harlequin's Museum'; 1793, 'The
Deaf Lover,' 'The Midnight Wanderers'; 1794,
'Arrived at Portsmouth,' 'The Travellers in
Switzerland'; 1 795, 'The Mysteries of the Castle';
1 796, ' Abroad and at Home, ' ' Lock and Key ' ;
1 797, ' The Italian Villagers '; 1807, ' Two Faces
under a Hood.' In many of his pieces he intro
duced songs, etc., selected from the works of other
composers, English and foreign ; and was thereby
SHIFT.
487
the meansof making the general public acquainted
with many beautiful melodies, of which they would
otherwise have remained ignorant.
Shield was perhaps the most original English
composer since Purcell. His melodies charm by
their simple, natural beauty ; at once vigorous,
chaste and refined, they appeal directly to the
hearts of Englishmen. But he also wrote songs
of agility, bristling with the most formidable diffi
culties ; these were composed to display the
abilities of Mrs. Billington and others. Among
his most popular songs are 'The Thorn,' 'The
Wolf," The heaving of the lead,' 'Old Towler,'
' The Arethusa,' ' The Ploughboy,' and 'The Post
Captain ' ; but these are but some of the most
prominent. One of his most popular pieces was
the trio, '0 happy fair,' which, though beautiful
as music, is remarkable for a singular misreading
of the text, which he has punctuated thus : —
O happy fair,
Your eyes are loadstars and your tongue sweet air.
More tunable than lark to shepherd's ear,
When wheat is green, when hawthorn buds appear —
actually closing the composition with a repeti
tion of the first two lines. Shield died at his
residence in Berners Street, Jan. 25, 1829, and
was buried on Feb. 4 in the south cloister of
Westminster Abbey. With the exception of his
fine tenor, reputed a Stainer, which he bequeathed
to George IV (who accepted the gift, but directed
that its utmost value should be paid to the tes
tator's presumed widow), he left his whole estate
to his 'beloved partner, Ann [Stokes], Mrs. Shield
upwards of forty years.' His valuable musical
library was sold in July 1829. [W.H.H.]
SHIFT, in violin-playing, a change of the
hand's position on the fingerboard. In the first
or ordinary position, the note stopped by the
first finger is one semitone, or one tone, as the
scale may require, above the open string. [See
POSITION.] Whenever this position is quitted,
the player is said to be ' on the shift ' ; and the
term is applied to changes of position, in either
direction, the player being said to 'shift up' or
' down ' as the case may be. The second position
on the violin is called the ' half shift,' the third
position the ' whole shift,' and the fourth the
' double shift.' The use of the shift is derived from
the viol. Instruments of the lute and viol type were
generally fretted by semitones throughout their
lower octave, or half of the string's length, and
on a fretted instrument the use of the shift pre
sents no difficulty. The viol music of the 1 7th cen
tury proves that players were familiar with the
art of shifting throughout the lower octave ; and it
is clear that it was equally well-known to the old
Italian violinists. From the following passage,
taken from a work of Tarquinio Merula (before
^sM
f
1639), it is quite evident that they were familiar
with the alternation of the first, second, and
488
SHIFT.
third positions, and other passages occur about
the same date, which extend even to the fourth
position. Practically the commonest and easiest
method of shifting is to advance by intervals
of a third, for instance from the first into the
third position (hence probably the denomination
' whole shift,' which the latter position has ac
quired), and from the third position into the
fifth. The same thing- prevails in the fingering
of the violoncello. In both instruments this
shift of a third is effected by means of the first
and second finger, which fire employed alternately
in ascending or descending the scale on a single
string. So inveterate does this practice of shift
ing by thirds become with many players, that
they are unable to shift in any other way, and
consequently never resort to the second position.
Eminent modern violinists, indeed, have frankly
confessed to not being masters of this position.
The doctrine and practice, however, of the old
Italian school was that the half-shift or second
position should be mastered thoroughly before
advancing to the third position ; and the works
of Bach, Handel and Tartini presume a funda
mental knowledge of the half shift as well as the
whole shift. Unnecessary shifting should always
be avoided; that is, all passages should be played
with as few alterations in the position of the left
hand as possible. To carry out this rule fully
demands a thorough knowledge of the finger
board, for a player who is only at home in certain
positions will be driven to the shift in passages
which ought to be executed without its aid. The
following simple passage, for instance, can be
played in the second position or half-shift with
out any change : —
But if the player is not master of this position,
he will be forced to shift on every alternate note.
Another rule is that the shift should be effected
quietly and firmly. In order to do this, it must
be effected not by a sudden or jerky motion, pro
ceeding from the shoulder, but by rapidly altering
the grasp of the thumb and fingers, the thumb
moving slightly in advance, and guiding the
fingers into the required position. The position
of the hand and arm should be disturbed only so
far as is absolutely necessary. [E. J.P.]
SHIRREFF, JANE, soprano singer, pupil of
Thomas Welsh, appeared at Covent Garden,
Dec. i, 1831, as Mandane in Arne's 'Artaxerxes,'
with great success. In 1832 she sang at the Con
cert of Ancient Music, the Philharmonic Concert,
and Gloucester Festival, and in 1834 at the West
minster Abbey Festival. Her engagement at
Covent Garden continued from 1831 to 1834-5.
In 1835 she commenced an engagement atDrury
Lane, but in 1837 returned to Covent Garden.
In 1838 she went to America, in company with
Wilson, E. Seguin and Mrs. E, Seguin, where she
became a universal favourite. On her return to
England she married and retired into private life.
SHUDI.
Her voice was full- toned, and powerful in the
higher, but somewhat weak in the lower notes ; her
intonation was perfect, and she was a much better
actress than the generality of singers. [W.H.H.]
SHORE, MATTHIAS, who in 1685 was one of
the trumpeters in 'ordinary to James II., was, a
few years afterwards, promoted to the post of
Sergeant Trumpeter, in which he distinguished
himself by the rigorous exaction of his fees of
office. [See SERGEANT TRUMPETER.] He died
in 1700, leaving three children : —
1. WILLIAM, also one of the King's trumpeters
in ordinary, succeeded his father as Sergeant
Trumpeter, died in Dec. 1707, and was buried
at St. Martin's-in-the-Fields. He followed his
father's example in the severe exaction of fees.
2. CATHERINE, born about 1668, who was a
pupil of Henry Purcell for singing and the
harpsichord. In 1693 she became the wife of
Colley Cibber, without consent of her father, who
manifested great displeasure at the match. His
resentment was not, however, of very long dura
tion, as when he made his will, March 5, 1695-6,
he bequeathed to her one third of the residue of
his property. Shortly after her marriage Mrs.
Cibber appeared on the stage as a singer, and,
among other songs, sang the second part of Pur-
cell's air 'Genius of England' (Don Quixote,
Part II.), to her brother John's trumpet accom
paniment. She is said to have died about 1730.
3. JOHN, the most celebrated trumpeter of
his time, in 1707 succeeded his brother William
as Sergeant Trumpeter. Purcell composed for
him obbligato trumpet parts to many songs, which
may be seen in the Orpheus Britannicus, and
which fully attest his skill. His playing is
highly commended in the 'Gentleman's Journal'
for January, 1691-2, where, in an account of the
celebration on St. Cecilia's day in the preceding
November, we read ' Whilst the company is at
table the hautboys and trumpets play succes
sively. Mr. Showers hath taught the latter of
late years to sound with all the softness imagin
able ; they plaid us some flat tunes made by Mr.
Finger with a general applause, it being a thing
formerly thought impossible upon an instrument
designed for a sharp key.'1 His name appears
in 1711 as one of the 24 musicians to Queen
Anne, and also as lutenist to the Chapel Royal.2
He is said to have been the inventor of the tuning-
fork, and also to have split his lip in sounding the
trumpet, thereby incapacitating himself for per
forming. He died Nov. 20, 1750, at the alleged
age of 90, but it is very probable that his age was
overstated and did not exceed 80. [W.H.H.]
SHUDI, famous harpsichord-maker, and
founder of the house of Broadwood. Burkat
Shudi, as he inscribed his name upon his instru
ments, was properly BURKHARDT TSCHUDI, and
was a cadet of a noble family belonging to Glarus
1 This contrivance, then considered so wonderful, has been ad
mirably employed by Handel in the second movement of ' Glory to
God ' in ' Joshua,' where the D major trumpets are used in B minor.
2 In the Cheque Book of the Chapel Royal he is said to have been
appointed lutenist in 1715, but the entry was evidently not mad«
until some time later, and probably from memory only.
SHUDI.
SHUDI.
in Switzerland.1 He was born March 13, 1702,
and came to England in 1718, as 2a simple jour
neyman joiner. When he turned to harpsichord-
making is not known, but we are told by Burney,
who knew Shudi and old Kirkman well, that
they were both employed in London by Tabel,3
a Fleming, and Burney calls them Tabel's fore
men, perhaps meaning his principal workmen.
The anecdote given by Burney, in Bees's Cyclo
paedia, of Kirkman's hasty wedding with his
master's widow, and acquisition with her of
Tabel's stock-in-trade, gives no information about
Shudi, who is believed to have begun business in
the house in Great Pulteney Street, still occupied
by Broadwood's firm, in 1732. Burney gives a
later and evidently a wrong date for Kirkman's
arrival in this country (1740); still Shudi may
have retired from Tabel and set up for himself
before Kirkman acquired Tabel's business. [See
KIRKMAN ; also BBOADWOOD.]
Kirkman had the King's Arms for the sign of
his business in Broad Street, Carnaby Market;
Shudi, the Plume of Feathers at the house now
33 Great Pulteney Street. He began in no back
street, but in a good house in the new Golden
Square neighbourhood, the most fashionable sub
urban quarter and adjacent to the Court of St.
James's. We may trace the choice of signs of
these old colleagues and now rival makers to the
divided patronage of the King (George II.) and
Prince of Wales, who were notoriously unfriendly.
No doubt Handel's friendship was of great value
to Shudi : few harpsichords were then made, as
owing to the relatively high price, and the great
expense and trouble of keeping them in order,
they were only for the rich. But the tuning and
repairing alone would keep a business going ;
harpsichords lasted long, and were submitted to
restoration and alteration that would surprise the
amateur of the present day.*
The Shudi harpsichord, formerly Queen Char
lotte's, now in Windsor Castle, is dated 1740. It
has a ' Lute ' stop, a pleasing variation of timbre,
and, like the pedal, of English invention in the
previous century. [See STOPS (HARPSICHORD).]
Frederick the Great took Prague by siege
Sept. 16, 1744. James Shudi Broadwood (MS.
Notes, 1838) accredits his grandfather Shudi with
the gift of a harpsichord to that monarch, Shudi
being a staunch Protestant, and regarding Fred
erick as the leader and champion of the Protestant
cause. Mr. Broadwood moreover believed that
a portrait of Shudi, which remained until a few
years since in one of the rooms in Great Pulteney
Street, represented him as engaged in tuning the
identical harpsichord thus bestowed. Shudi's
wife and two sons are also in the picture, a re-
1 Of the Schwanden branch. Heinrlch, born 1074, died 1149, made
Feodary of Glarus by the Lady Gutta, Abbess of Seckingen, was the
first to adopt the surname Schudi (sic). The family tree goes back
to Johann, Mayor of Glarus, born about 870.
2 See Schweizerische Lexicon, Zurich, 1795, art. Tschudi.
8 Messrs. Broadwood's books of 1777 mention a secondhand harpsi
chord by Tabel (written Table), a solitary instance of an instrument
made by him.
< While pianofortes are now kept in tune by yearly contracts, the
researches of Mr. William Dale, in Messrs. Broadwood's old books,
show that harpsichords in the last ceutury were tuned by quarterly
contracts !
production of which serves as the frontispiece to
Rimbault's History of the Pianoforte. The elder
boy, apparently nine years old, was born in 1736.
This synchronises the picture with Frederick's
victory and the peace concluded the following
year. But the writer could not find this instru
ment either in Potsdam or Berlin in 1881. The
tradition about it is however strengthened by the
fact that in 1766 Frederick obtained from Shudi
two special double harpsichords for his New Palace
at Potsdam, where they still remain. Instead
of the anglicised ' Shudi,' they are accurately
inscribed ' Tschudi.' One has silver legs, etc, ;
the other rests upon a partially gilded stand.
Following Burney, who however only describes
the first one, they appear to have been placed in
the apartments of the Princess Amelia, and the
Prince of Prussia. These instruments, like all
Shudi's which still exist, are of the soundest
possible workmanship, discrediting Burney's as
sertion of the want of durability of his harpsi
chords5, a reproach however which Burney goes on
to say could not be alleged against Shudi's son-
in-law and successor Broadwood. He however
praises Shudi's tone as refined and delicate. The
Potsdam harpsichords were made with Shudi's
Venetian Swell, for which the pedals still exist,
but it was probably not to the German taste of
the time, and was therefore removed. Mr. Hop
kins, in his comprehensive work upon the Organ,
says the original organ swell was the 'nagshead,'
a mere shutter, invented by Abraham Jordan in
1712. But to imitate its effect in the harpsichord
we know that Plenius about 1750, and also in
London, by a pedal movement, gradually raised
and lowered a portion of the top or cover. This
coming into general use, Shudi improved upon
it by his important invention of the ' Venetian
Swell ' on the principle of a Venetian blind, which
he patented Dec. 18, 1769. He probably delayed
taking out the patent until it became necessary
by his partnership with John Broadwood, who
had also become his son-in-law,6 earlier in the
same year. This invention was subsequently
• transferred to the organ. [See SWELL.]
A harpsichord exists inscribed with the joint
names of Shudi and Broadwood, dated 1770,
although Shudi made harpsichords for himself
after that date and independent of the partner
ship, as we know by existing instruments and by
his will. About 1772 he retired to a house in
Charlotte Street, leaving the business premises
to his son-in-law, John Broadwood, and died
Aug. 19, 1.773. The next day a harpsichord was
shipped to ' the Empress,' ordered by Joseph II.
for Maria Theresa. The harpsichord that was
Haydn's, recently acquired for the Museum at
Vienna, at a cost of £ no sterling, was also a' Shudi
and Broadwood,' but this was the younger Burkat
s Burney gives as his authority Snetzler the organ-builder, who
attached organs to some of Shudi's harpsichords, and was moreover
Shudi's intimate friend and executor. Shudi left him his ring, con
taining a portrait of Frederick the Great.
6 By his marriage with Barbara Shudi, baptized March 12, 1748 ;
married to John Broadwood Jan. 2, 1769 ; died July 8, 1776. The first
wife of John Broadwood, she was the mother of James Shudi Broad-
wood, who was born Dec. 20, 1772, died Aug. 8,1851 ; and grandmothej
of Mr. Henry Fowler Broadwood and Mr. Walter Stewart Broadwood.
490
SHUDT.
SI.
Shudi, who was in partnership with John Broad-
wood from 1773 to about 1782, and died in 1803.
A list of the existing harpsichords by Shudi
and Shudi & Broad wood, as far as is known
(1882), is here appended ; all but one are Double
harpsichords. The price of a Single harpsichord,
about 1770, was 35 guineas; with Octava (i.e.
Octave string), 40 guineas; with Octava and
Swell, 50 guineas. A Double harpsichord with
Swell, was 80 guineas.1
94
260
511
512
625
639
686
691
750
762
399
902
919
Date.
1740
1751
1766
1766
1770
1771
1773
1773
1775
1775
1781
1781
17ti2
Signal vre.
Burkat Shudi.
Burkat Tschudi.
Burkat Shudi et Johannes
Broadwood.
Burkat Shudi.
Burkat Shudi et Johannes
Broadwood.
Present Owner.
H. M. the Queen, Windsor Castle.
F. Fairley, Esq., Newcastle-on-Tyne.
Emperor of Germany, Potsdam.
W. Dale, Esq.
John Broadwood & Sons.
Ditto. Lent to the Rev. Sir F. A. G.
Ouseley, Bart., Tenbury.
M. Victor Mahillon, Brussels.
Messrs. Price & Sons, Teovil.
Musikverein, Vienna.
T. W. Taphouse, Esq., Oxford.
G. Harford Lloyd, Esq., Gloucester.
Stephen Stratton, Esq., Birmingham.
Remarks.
Kemoved from Eew Palace in 1875.
A single keyboard. 5 Oct., F— F, with lowest F sharp
omitted. 2 stops.
Blade for Frederick the Great, and described by Burney.
Made for Frederick the Great. (Both of 5i Oct., C-F.)
Was in David Hartley's family. 6 stops, 2 pedals, as have
nearly all these instruments.
Played upon by Moscheles and by Mr. Ernst Pauer in
their historical performances.
Bought of Mr. T. W. Taphouse, 1861.
Sent to ' the Empress ' (Maria Theresa) Aug. 20, 1773.
Obtained by M. Victor Mahillon from Vienna.
Made for Lady Stoverdale, Kedlinch, Bruton.
Was Joseph Haydn's, and subsequently Herbeck's,
5 oct., F— F., 7 stops, 2 pedals. Came from Mrs. Anson's,
Sudbury Rectory, Derby.
5 oct., F— F. Restored by Mr. Taphouse.
Belonged to the Wrottesley family. FA J H 1
SHUTTLE WORTH, OBADIAH, son of Thos.
Shuttleworth of Spitalfields, who had acquired
some money by vending MS. copies of Corelli's
works before they were published in England.
He was an excellent violinist, and was principal
violin at the Swan Tavern concerts, Cornhill,
from their commencement in 1728 until his
death. He was also a skilful organist, and in
1724 succeeded Philip Hart as organist of St.
Michael's, Cornhill, and a few years afterwards
was appointed one of the organists of the Temple
Church. He composed 12 concertos and some
sonatas for the violin, which he kept in MS., his
only printed compositions being two concertos
adapted from the first and eleventh concertos of
Corelli. He died about 1735. [W.H.H.]
SI. The syllable used, in the musical termin
ology of Italy and France, to designate the
note B ; and adapted, in systems of Solmisation
which advocate the employment of a movable
starting-point, to the seventh degree of the Scale.
The method invented by Guido d'Arezzo, in
the earlier half of the nth century, recognised
the use of six syllables only — ut, re, mi, fa, sol,
la — suggested by the initial and post-csesural
syllables of the Hymn, ' Ut queant laxis ' ; the
completion of the Octave being provided for by
the introduction of certain changes in the position
of the root-syllable, ut? Until the mediaeval
theory of the Scale was revolutionised by the
discovery of the functions of the Leading-Note,
this method answered its purpose perfectly; but
when the Ecclesiastical Modes were abandoned in
favour of our modern form of tonality, it became
absolutely necessary to add another syllable to the
series. This syllable is said to have been first
used, about 1590, by Erycius Puteanus, of Dord
recht, the author of a treatise on Music, entitled
'Musathena'; and tradition asserts that it was
formed from the initial syllable of the fourth
1 The altered value of money should be borne in mind in com
paring these prir.es with those of modern pianofortes.
2 See HEXACHOBD ; MUTATION ; SOLMISATION.
verse — 'Sancte Joannes' — of the Hymn already
alluded to, by the substitution of i for a. This
account, however, has not been universally re
ceived. Mersennus 3 attributes the invention to
a French musician, named Le Maire, who la
boured for thirty years to bring it into practice,
but in vain, though it was generally adopted
after his death. Brossard4 gives substantially
the same account. Bourdelot 5 attributes the
discovery to a certain nameless Cordelier, of the
Convent of Ave Maria, in France, about the year
1675; but tells us that the Abbe de la Louette,
Maitre de Chapelle at Notre Dame de Paris, ac
corded the honour to a Singing-Master, named
Metru, who flourished in Paris about the year
1676. In confirmation of these traditions, Bour
delot assures us that he once knew a Lutenist,
named Le Moine, who remembered both Metru
and the Cordelier, as having practised the new
system towards the close of the I7th century
— whence it has been conjectured that one of
these bold innovators may possibly have invented,
and the other adopted it, if indeed both did not
avail themselves of an earlier discovery.
Mersennus tells us that some French professors
of his time used the syllable za, to express Bb,
reserving si for BB. Loulid, writing some sixty
years later, rejected za, but retained the use of
si.6 The Spanish musician, Andrea Lorente, of
Alcala, used bi to denote BO ;7 while in the latter
half of the 1 7th century, our own countryman,
Dr. Wallis, thought it extraordinary that the
verse, ' Sancte Johannes,' did not suggest to Guido
himself the use of the syllable sa— and this, not
withstanding the patent fact that the addition
of a seventh syllable would have struck at the
very root of the Guidonian system ! [W.S.K.J
3 'Harmonic Universelle • (Paris, 1636), p. 183.
4 ' Dictionaire de Musique.' (Amsterdam. 1703.)
5 ' Histoire de la Musique.' compiled from the MSS. of the A
Bourdelot, and those of his nephew, Bonnet Bourdelot, and si
quently published by Bonnet, Paymaster to the Lords of the r
nient of Paris. (Paris, 1705 and 1715. Amsterdam, 1725, 1743.)
6 ' Elements ou Principes de Musique.' (Amsterdam, 1693.)
7 ' Porque de la Musica.' (1672.)
SI CONTRA FA.
SI CONTRA FA. [See Mr CONTRA FA.]
SIBONI, GIUSEPPE, a distinguished tenor
singer, born1 at Forli Jan. 27, 1780, made his
de"but at Florence in 1797, and after singing
in Genoa, Milan, and Prague, appeared at the
King's Theatre, London, in 1806, and sang for
the following three seasons. In 1810, II, 12,
13 and 14 he was in Vienna, where he sang at
the first performances of Beethoven's 'Welling
ton's Sieg' and 'Tremate empi.' In 1813 he
sang at Prague, and after engagements at Naples
and St. Petersburg (1818) settled at Copenhagen
in Oct. 1819, where he lived for the rest of his
life, occupying the post of Director of the Royal
Opera and of the Conservatorium. He was mar
ried three times, his second wife being a sister
of Schubert's friend von Schober, and died at
Copenhagen, March 29, 1839. His style is said
to have been very good, although his tone was
somewhat guttural. His compass was two octaves,
from Bb to Bb. He was a good actor and possessed
a fine stage presence. Many of Paer's tenor parts
were written for him. His son,
ERIK ANTON WALDEMAR, born at Copenhagen
Aug. 26 (not 28, as stated in Mendel), 1828, learnt
the pianoforte from Courlander and Goetze, com
position from F. Vogel, and harmony from Prof.
J. P. E. Hartmann, In Sept. 1847 he went to
Leipzig, and studied under Moscheles and Haupt-
mann, but on the outbreak of the Schleswig Hoi-
stein insurrection he enlisted as a volunteer in the
Danish army, and took part in the campaign of
1848. In 1851 he went to Vienna and studied
counterpoint under Sechter until 1853, when he
returned to Copenhagen, visiting Paris on his way.
Among his pupils at this time were the Princess
of Wales, the Empress of Russia, and the Land
grave Frederick William of Hesse Cassel. In 1864
Herr Siboni was appointed organist and professor
of music at the Royal Academy of Music of Sorb',
in Seeland, a post he still holds. The following
are his chief compositions : —
SIDE-DRUM.
491
l. PUBLISHED.
3 Impromptus for PF. for 4
hands (op. 1) ; Organ Preludes ;
Quartet for PF. and Strings (op.
10); Tragic Overture in C minor
(op. 14) ; Songs and PF. pieces.
2. UNPUBLISHED.
2 Danish operas — ' Loreley,' in 1
act; 'Carl den Andens Flugt.'in
3 acts (Libretto on subject from
English History by Professor
Thomas Overskou), successfully
performed at the Royal Theatre
of Copenhagen : Psalm III, for
Bass Solo, Chorus, and Orchestra ;
' Stabat Mater,' for Soli, Chorus,
Orchestra, and Organ ; Cantata,
' The Battle of Murteu,' for Soli,
Male Chorus, and Orchestra ; 'The
Assault of Copenhagen,' Cantata
for Soli, Chorus, and Orchestra;
2 Symphonies ; Concert Overture ;
PF. Concerto ; String Quartets ;
PF. Trio ; Duet for 2 PFs. , So
natas for PF. and Violin, and PF.
and Cello, etc., many of them per
formed at concerts in Copenhagen.
His wife, JOHANNA FREDERIKA (nte CRULL),
, au excellent pianist, born at Rostock Jan. 30,
1839, is the daughter of Hofrath Dr. Crull and
Catherine Braun. She found an early protectress
in the Duchess of Cambridge, who placed her
under Marschner. On the death of her father,
she lived in Sweden with the Baroness Stjernblad,
who in 1860 sent her to Leipzig, where she
was one of Moscheles's most promising pupils.
In the following winter she went to Copenhagen,
and played with great success. She was married
l Fe"tis gives his birthplace as Bologna, and the date as 1782, but the
oove details are from autobiographical notes supplied by his son.
to Herr Siboni Sept. I, 1866, since when she
has only occasionally performed at concerts at
Copenhagen and Soro. [W. B. S.]
SICILIANA, SICILIANO, SICILIENNE,
a dance rhythm closely allied to the Pastorale.
The name is derived from a dance-song popular
in Sicily, analogous to the Tuscan Rispetti.2
Walther (Lexicon, 1732) classes these composi
tions as canzonettas, dividing them into Nea
politan and Sicilian, the latter being like jigs,
written in rondo form, in 12-8 or 6-8 time.
The Siciliana was sometimes used for the slow
movement of Suites and Sonatas (as in Bach's
Violin Sonata in G minor),, but is of more fre
quent occurence in vocal music, in which Handel,
following the great Italian masters, made great
use of it. Amongst later composers, Meyerbeer
has applied the name to the movement ' 0 for
tune, k ton caprice ' in the finale to Act i. of
Robert le Diable, although it has little in com
mon with the older examples. The Siciliana
is generally written in 6-8, but sometimes in
12-8 time, and is usually in a minor key. In
the bar of six quavers, the first note is usually a
dotted quaver, and the fourth a crotchet, fol
lowed by two semiquavers. The Siciliana is
sometimes in one movement, but usually ends
with a repetition of the first part. It should be
played rather quickly, but not so fast as the
Pastorale, care being taken not to drag the time
and to avoid all strong accentuation, smoothness
being an important characteristic of this species
of composition. For examples we may refer to
Pergolesi's ' Ogui pena piu. spietate ' (Gemme d'
Antichita, no. 24), and Handel's airs ' Let me
wander not unseen ' (L' Allegro), and 'Die Rosen-
kronen ' (The Passion). [W. B. S.]
SICILIAN BRIDE, THE. A grand opera
in 4 acts ; words translated by Bunn from St.
Georges, music by Balfe. Produced at Drury
Lane Theatre March 6, 1851. [G.]
SICILIAN MARINERS' HYMN, THE. A
melody which, fifty years ago, was in great request
as a hymn-tune, chiefly in Nonconformist chapels
in England. We give the first two strains.
It appears as ' Sicilian Mariners' in Miller's 'Dr.
Watts' s Psalms and Hymns set to new music,'
which was entered at Stationers' Hall Oct. 18,
1 800 ; but it exists on a sheet, also containing
' Adeste Fideles,' which was probably published
some years before the close of last century. On
this sheet it is set to the words of a hymn to the
Virgin Mary, ' 0 sanctissima, o purissima.'
This is all the information which the writer
has been able to collect concerning it. [G.]
SIDE-DRUM. This is used in the army to
mark the time in marching, either with or with
out fifes ; also for various calls and signals. [See
SIGNALS.] Modern composers often use it in
2 For an account of these Sicilian songs see G. Pitr4. 'Sui Canti
Popolari Siciliani,' Palermo, 1868.
492
SIDE-DRUM.
the theatre, and even occasionally in orchestral
music. Instances will be found in the march in
Beethoven's ' Egmont' music ; in Spohr's 'Weihe
der Tone' Symphony; in Raff's 'Lenore,' and
in the ' Marche au supplice ' of Berlioz's ' Sym
phonic fantastique.' Rossini has employed it in
the 'Gazza ladra' overture, where it is said to
indicate the presence of soldiers in the piece ;
in that to the ' Siege of Corinth,' in the accom
paniment to Marcello's psalm-tune — which in the
score is oddly designated as a 'Marche lugubre
grecque.' [DRUM 3.] [V.deP.]
SIEGE DE CORINTHE, LE. Lyric tragedy
in 3 acts ; words by Soumet and Balocchi,
music by Rossini. Produced at the Academic
Oct. 9, 1826. It was an adaptation and ex
tension of ' Maometto Secondo,' produced in 1820.
The Andante of the overture, entitled ' Marche
lugubre grecque,' is framed on a motif of 8 bars,
taken note for note from Marcello's 2ist Psalm,
but with a treatment by the side-drum (Caisse
ronlante) and other instruments of which Mar-
cello can never have dreamt. [G.]
SIEGE OF ROCHELLE, THE. A grand
original opera, in 3 acts ; words by Fitzball,
music by Balfe. Produced at Drury Lane Theatre
Oct. 29, 1835. The subject is identical with that
of ' Linda di Chamouni.' [G.]
SIFACE, GIOVANNI FRANCESCO GROSSI,DETTO.
Too few details are known about the life of this
artist, though all the accounts of him. — for the
most part as contradictory as they are meagre —
agree in representing him as one of the very
greatest singers of his time. He was born at
Pescia in Tuscany, about the middle of the iyth
century, and is said to have been a pupil of Redi.
If so, this must have been Tommaso Redi, who
became chapel-master at Loretto towards the end
of the 1 7th century, although, as he was Siface's
contemporary, it seems improbable that he should
have been his instructor. Siface was admitted
into the Pope's chapel in April 1675. This dis
proves the date (1666) given by Fe'tis and others
for his birth, as no boys sang then in the Sistine
choir. He would seem at that time to have been
already known by the sobriquet which has always
distinguished him, and which he owed to his
famous impersonation of Siface or Syphax in some
opera, commonly said to be the 'Mitridate' of
Scarlatti ; an unlikely supposition, for besides that
Scarlatti's two operas of that name were not
written till some 40 years later, it is not easy to
see what Syphax can have to do in a work on the
subject of Mithri dates.
Siface's voice, an ' artificial soprano,' was full
and beautiful ; his style of singing, broad, noble,
and very expressive. Mancini extols his choir-
singing as being remarkable for its excellence.
In 1679 he was at Venice for the Carnival, acting
with great success in the performances of Palla-
vicini's opera 'Nerone,' of which a description may
be found in the ' Mercure gal ant ' of the same year.
After this he came to England, and Hawkins
mentions him as pre-eminent among all the
foreign singers of that period. He was for a
SIGNATURE.
time attached to James II.'s chapel,1 but soon
returned to Italy. In the second part of Play-
ford's collection, ' Musick's Handmaid' (1689),
there is an air by Purcell, entitled 'Sefauchi's
farewell,' which refers to Siface's departure from
this country.
This great singer was robbed and murdered
by his postilion, while travelling, some say from
Genoa to Turin, others, from Bologna to Ferrara.
According to Hawkins this happened about the
year 1699. [F.A.M.]
SIGNALE FUR DIE MUSIKALISCHE
WELT — ' Signals for the musical world' — a well-
known musical periodical, at the head of its tribe
in Germany. It was founded by Bartholf Senff
of Leipzig, who remains its editor and proprietor,
and its first number appeared on Jan. i, 1842. It
is 8vo. in size and is more strictly a record of news
than of criticism, though it occasionally contains
original articles of great interest, letters of musi
cians, and other documents. Its contributors
include F. Hiller, von Billow, Bernsdorf, C. F.
Pohl, Richard Pohl, Stockhausen, Szarvady,
Marches!, and many other of the most eminent
mutdcal writers. Though not strictly a weekly
publication, 52 numbers are published yearly. [G.]
SIGNALS. The drum and bugle calls or
' sounds ' of the army. [See SOUNDS.] [G.]
SIGNATURE (Fr. Signes accidental® ; Ger.
Vorzeichnung, properly regulars Vorzeichnung).
The signs of chromatic alteration, sharps or
flats, which are placed at the commencement of
a composition, immediately after the clef, and
which affect all notes of the same names as the
degrees upon which they stand, unless their
influence is in any case counteracted by a con
trary sign.
The necessity for a signature arises from the
• i '
fact that in modern music every major scale is
an exact copy of the scale of C, and every minor
scale a copy of A minor, so far as regards the
intervals — tones and semitones — by which the
degrees of the scale are separated. This uni
formity can only be obtained, in the case of a
major scale beginning on any other note thanC,
by the use of certain sharps or flats ; and instead
of marking these sharps or flats, which are con
stantly required, on each recurrence of the notes
which require them, after the manner of AC
CIDENTALS, they are indicated once for^all at the
beginning of the composition (or, as is custom
ary, at the beginning of every line), for greate
convenience of reading. The signature thus
shows the key in which the piece is written, tor
since all those notes which have no sign in tin
signature are understood to be naturals (na
turals not being used in the signature), t
whole scale may readily be inferred from ti.
sharps or flats which are present, while if i
is no signature the scale is that of C, whicn
consists of naturals only. [See KEY.] The Mow
ing is a table of the signatures of major scales.
i Evelyn heard him there. Jan. SO. 1687, and on April MW
at Pepys's house. He speaks of him in highly commendatory .
SIGNATURE.
Sharp Signatures.
SILAS.
493
Key of G, P. A, B, B, F sharp, C sharp.
Flat Signatures.
5:
ey of F, B flat, E fiat, A flat, D flat, G flat, C flat.
The order in which the signs are placed in the
signature is always that in which they have
been successively introduced in the regular for
mation of scales with more sharps or flats out of
those with fewer or none. This will be seen in
the above table, where Fjl, which was the only
sharp required to form the scale of G, remains
the first sharp in all the signatures, Cf being
the second throughout, and so on, and the same
rule is followed with the flats. The last sharp or
flat of any signature is therefore the one which
distinguishes it from all scales with fewer signs,
and on this account it is known as the essential
note of the scale. If a sharp, it is on the
seventh degree of the scale ; if a flat, on the
fourth.
The signature of the minor scale is the same
as that of its relative major (i. e. the scale which
has its key-note a minor third above the key
note of the minor scale), but the sharp seventh —
which, though sometimes subject to alteration
for reasons due to the construction of melody,
is an essential note of the scale — is not in
cluded in the signature, but is marked as an
accidental when required. The reason of this is
that if it were placed there it would interfere
with the regular order of sharps or flats, and the
appearance of the signature would become so
anomalous as to give rise to possible misunder
standing, as will be seen from the following
example, where the signature of A minor (with
sharp seventh) might easily be mistaken for that
of G major misprinted, and that of F minor for
Eb major.
2.
A minor.
F minor.
In former times many composers were accus
tomed to dispense with the last sharp or flat
of the signature, both in major and minor keys,
and to mark it as an accidental (like the sharp
seventh of the minor scale) wherever required,
possibly in order to call attention to its im
portance as an essential note of the scale. Thus
Handel rarely wrote F minor with more than
three flats, the Db being marked as an ac
cidental as well as the Efl (see 'And with His
stripes ' from Messiah) ; and a duet ' Joys in
gentle train appearing ' (Athalia), which is in
reality in E major, has but three sharps.
Similar instances may be found in the works
of Corelli, Geminiani, and others.
When in the course of a composition the key
changes for any considerable period of time, it is
frequently convenient to change the signature,
in order to avoid the use of many accidentals.
In effecting this change, such sharps or flats as
are no longer required are cancelled by naturals,
and this is the only case in which naturals are
employed in the signature ; for example —
3.
r^T „ x
HUMMEL, 'La Contemplazione.'
In such a case the modulation must be into a
sufficiently distant key, as in the above ex
ample; modulations into nearly related keys,
as, for instance, into the dominant, in the case
of the second subject of a sonata, never require
a change of signature, however long the new
key may continue. Otherwise there is no limit
to the frequency or extent of such changes, pro
vided the reading is facilitated thereby. In the
second movement of Sterndale Bennett's sonata
' The Maid of Orleans ' there are no fewer than
thirteen changes of signature. [F.T.]
SILAS, EDOUARD, pianist and composer, was
horn at Amsterdam, Aug. 22, 1827. His first
teacher was Neher, one of the Court orchestra at
Mannheim. In 1842 he was placed under Kalk-
brenner at Paris, and soon afterwards entered the
Conservatoire under Benoist for the organ and
HaleVy for composition, and in 1849 obtained the
first prize for the former. In 1850 he came to
England; played first at Liverpool, and made
his first appearance in London at the Musical
Union, May 21. Since that date Mr. Silas has
been established in London as teacher, and as
organist of the Catholic Chapel at Kingston-on-
Thames. His oratorio ' Joash ' (words compiled
by G. Linley) was produced at the Norwich Fes
tival of 1863. A Symphony in A (op. 19) was
produced by the Musical Society of London,
April 22, 1863 ; repeated at the Crystal Palace,
Feb. 20, 1864 '•> an(l afterwards published (Cramer
& Co.). A Concerto for PF. and orchestra in
D minor is also published (Cramer & Co.). A
Fantasia and an Elegie, both for PF. and orches
tra, were given at the Crystal Palace in 1865 and
1873. In 1866 he received the prize of the
Belgian competition for sacred music for his Mass
for 4 voices and organ.
494
SILAS.
Mr. Silas is the author of a Treatise on Musical
Notation, and an Essay on a new method of
Harmony — both unpublished. He has still in
MS. an English opera, 'Nitocris'; overture and
incidental music to ' Fanchette" ; a musical come
dietta, 'Love's Dilemma'; a Cantata; an 'Ave
Verum'; two *O Salutaris'; a Symphony in
C major ; and other compositions. The list of
his published instrumental works is very large,
and includes many PF. pieces, among which the
best known are Gavotte in E minor, Bourre'e in
G minor, ' Malvina ' (romance), Suite in A minor
op. 103, Six Duets, etc., etc.
Mr. Silas is well known as a man of great
humour and extraordinary musical ability. He
is a teacher of harmony at the Guildhall School of
Music ; and his pupils there and in private are
very numerous. [G.]
SILBERMANN. A family of organ builders,
clavichord and pianoforte makers, of Saxon origin,
of whom the most renowned were Andreas, who
built the Strassburg Cathedral organ, and Gott
fried, who built the organs of Freiberg and Dresden,
and was the first to construct the Pianoforte in Ger
many. Authorities differ as to whether Andreas
and Gottfried were brothers, or uncle and nephew.
Following Gerber's Lexicon they were sons of
Michael Silbermann, a carpenter at Grafenstein
in Saxony, where ANDREAS was born in 1678.
He was brought up to his father's craft, and
travelled, according to the custom of the country,
in 1 700. He learnt organ-building, and in 1 703
we find him settled in that vocation at Strass
burg. According to Hopkins and Rimbault ' he
built the Strassburg organ — his greatest work of
29 recorded by them — in 1714-16. He had nine
sons, of whom three were organ builders, and after
the father's death, in 1733 or 34, carried on the
business in common. Of the three, Johann An
dreas, the eldest (born 1712, died 1783), built the
Predigerkirche organ at Strassburg and that of
the Abbey of St. Blaise in the Black Forest. In
all he built 54 organs, in addition to writing
a history of the city of Strassburg. His son,
Johann Josias, was a musical-instrument maker.
The next son of Andreas, Johann Daniel, born
1718, died 1766, was employed by his uncle
Gottfried, and (according to Mr. Hopkins) was
entrusted after his uncle's death with the com
pletion of the famous Court organ (at the Catholic
Church) in Dresden. Mooser2 however, who
claims to follow good authorities, attributes the
completion of this instrument to Zacharias Hilde-
brand. Be this as it may, Johann Daniel re
mained at Dresden, a keyed-instrument maker,
and constructor of ingenious barrel-organs. A
composition of his is preserved in Marpurg's
'Raccolta' (i 757). JohannHeinrich, the youngest
son of Andreas, born 1727, was living in 1792,
when Gerber's Lexicon was published. His
pianofortes were well known in Paris ; he made
them with organ pedals, and constructed a harp
sichord of which the longest strings were of what
may be called the natural length, 16 feet !
i ' The Organ, its History and Construction.' London, 1870.
a ' Gottfried Silbermann.' Langensalza. 1857.
SILBERMANN.
But the greatest of the Silbermann family was
GOTTFRIED, who was born in the little village of
Kleinbobritzsch, near Frauenstein, in 1683 (ac
cording to Mooser on Jan. 14). He was at first
placed with a bookbinder, but soon quitted him
and went to Andreas at Strassburg. Having got
into trouble by the attempted abduction of a nun,
he had to quit that city in 1707 and go back to
Frauenstein, where he built his first organ (after
wards destroyed by fire, the fate of several of his
instruments). He appears to have settled at
Freiberg in 1709, and remained there for some
years. He built, in all, 47 organs in Saxony.3
He never married, and was overtaken by death
Aug. 4, 1 753, while engaged upon his finest work,
the Dresden Court organ. Although receiving
what we should call very low prices for his organs,
by living a frugal life he became comparatively
rich, and his talent and exceptional force of
character enabled him to achieve an eminent
position. His clavichords were as celebrated as
his organs. Emanuel Bach had one of them for
nearly half a century, and the instrument many
years after it was made, when heard under the
hands of that gifted and sympathetic player, ex
cited the admiration of Burney. It cannot be
doubted that he was the first German who made
a pianoforte. He was already settled in Dresden
in 1.725, when Kbnig translated into German
Scipione Maffei's account of the invention of the
pianoforte at Florence by Cristofori. This fact
has been already mentioned [PIANOFORTE, vol. ii.
P- 7l3a~]> and we now add some further particulars
gained by personal search and inspection at Pots
dam in 1881. We know from Agricola, one of
J. S. Bach's pupils, that in 1726 Gottfried Silber
mann submitted two pianofortes of his make to
that great master. Bach finding much fault with
them, Gottfried was annoyed, and for some time
desisted from further experiments in that direc
tion. It is possible that the intercourse between
Dresden and Northern Italy enabled him, either
then or later, to see a Florentine pianoforte. It is
certain that three grand pianofortes made by
him and acquired by Frederick the Great4 for
Potsdam — where they still remain in the music-
rooms of the Stadtschloss, Sans Souci, and Neues
Palais,5 inhabited by that monarch — are, with
unimportant differences, repetitions of the Cristo
fori pianofortes existing at Florence. Frederick
is said to have acquired more than three, but
no others are now to be found. Burney's depre
ciation of the work of Germans in their own
country finds no support in the admirable work
of Gottfried Silbermann in these pianofortes. If
its durability needed other testimony, we might
refer to one of his pianofortes which Zelter met
s Fire of 3 manuals, Freiberg, Zittau and Frauenstein ; the Frauen-
kirche and Katholische Hofkirche at Dresden ; twenty-four of 2
manuals ; fifteen of 1 manual with pedals, and three of 1 manusl
without pedals. (Mooser. p. 125.)
4 Probably in 1746. The peace of Dresden was signed by Frederick,
Christmas Day 1745 ; he would have time after that event to inspect
Silbermann's pianofortes.
5 The Silbermann piano Burney mentions was that of the Neues
Palais. He must have heard the one at Sans Souci, although he does
not say so. In all probability the piano J. S. Bach played upon
specially, on the occasion of his visit to Frederick the Great, was the
one still in the Stadtschloss. the town palace of Potsdam.
SILBERMANN.
•with at Weimar in 1804, and praised to Goethe ;
and to another spoken of by Mooser in 1857 as
having been up to a then recent date used at the
meetings of the Freemason's Lodge at Freiberg.
Gottfried Silbermann invented the CEMBAL D'
AMOUR, a kind of double clavichord. [A.J.H.]
SILCHER, FRIEDRICH, well-known composer
of Lieder, born June 27, 1789, at Schnaith, near
Schorndorf in Wiirtemburg, was taught music
by his father, and by Auberlen, organist at
Fellbach near Stuttgart. He was educated
for a schoolmaster, and his first post was at
Ludwigsburg, where he began to compose. In
1815 he took a conductorship at Stuttgart, and
composed a cantata, which procured him, in
1817, the post of conductor to the University
of Tubingen. This he held till 1860, when he
retired, and died shortly after (Aug. 26) at
Tubingen. The honorary degree of Doctor had
been conferred upon him by the University in
1852. His most important publications are —
'Sechs vierstimmige Hymnen' (Laupp), 'Drei-
etimmiges wlirtemb. Choralbuch' (ibid.), and
'Swabian, Thuringian, and Franconian Volks-
lieder' (12 parts), many of which are his own
compositions. Several of Silcher's melodies have
become true songs of the people, such as ' Aenn-
chen von Tharau,' ' Morgen muss ich weit von
bier,' 'Ich weiss nicht was soil es bedeuten,'
'Zu Strassburg ent der Schanz,' etc. The Lieder
were published simultaneously for i and 2
voices, with PF, and for 4 men's voices. He
edited a method for harmony and composition
in 1851. A biographical sketch of Silcher by
Kostlin appeared in 1877. [F.G.]
SIMAO. [See PORTOGALLO.]
SIMILI, 'like '; a word commonly used in a
series of passages or figures of similar form, to be
performed in exactly the same way. After the
first few bars of such passages or figures the word
simili is used to save trouble of copying the
marks of expression and force at every recurrence
of the figure. ' Simili marks '
SINCLAIR.
495
occur generally in MS. or old printed music, and
signify that the contents of the previous bar are
to be repeated in every consecutive succeeding
bar in which the marks occur. [J.A.F.M.]
SIMPSON, CHRISTOPHER. [See SYMPSON.]
SIMPSON, THOMAS, an English musician, who
settled in Germany, and about 1615 was a
violist in the band of the Prince of Holstein
Schaumburg. He published the following works :
'Opusculum neuer Pavanen, Galliarden, Cour-
anten und Volten,' Frankfort, 1610 ; ' Pavanen,
Volten und Galliarden,' Frankfort, 1611 ; and
'Tafel Consort allerhand lustige Lieder von 4
InstrumentenundGeneral-bass/Hamburgh, 1621,
containing, besides pieces by Simpson himself,
some by Peter Phillips, John Dowland, Robert
and Edward Johnson, and others. [W.H.H.]
SIMROCK. A very famous German music-
publishing house, founded in 1790 at Bonn by
Nikolaus Simrock, second waldhorn player in the
Elector's band, to which Beethoven and his father
belonged. The first of Beethoven's works on
which Simrock's name appears as original pub
lisher is the Kreutzer Sonata, op. 47, issued in
1805. But he published for Beethoven an ' Edi
tion tres Correcte ' of the two Sonatas in G and D
minor (op. 31, nos. I and 2), which Nageli had
printed so shamefully ; and there is evidence in
the letters that Simrock was concerned in others
of Beethoven's early works. The next was the
Sextet for strings and 2 horns, op. 81 6 (1810) ;
then the two Sonatas for PF. and cello, op. 102
(1817) ; the ten themes with variations for PF.
and violin or flute, op. 107 (1820). In 1870 a
branch was founded in Berlin by PETER JOSEPH
SIMROCK, who has published the principal works
of Brahms since that date. [G.]
SINA, Louis, born in 1778, plajred 2nd violin
to Schuppanzigh in Prince Lichnowsky's youth
ful quartet [see vol. i. p. 132] and later in the
Rasoumowsky quartet, when the Count himself
did not play.
Notwithstanding the high esteem in which he
was held as a player, very few details of his life
are given. He was a pupil of E. A. Forster,
the same whom Beethoven called his ' old master.'
In 1819 he was in Breslau with Lincke, and is
noticed in an account of the musical season in
that city, in the A. M. Zeitung, for Nov. 1 7th of
that year. Sina afterwards emigrated to Paris,
where he was known as an odd old bachelor,
whose unfailing humour made him a welcome
guest among the artists and amateurs in the
Paris salons. He died, quite suddenly, at Bou
logne, Oct. 2, 1857, and was so little known there
that his body would probably have remained un-
buried but for the offer of a Protestant clergy
man, by whom he was interred in the graveyard
on the S. Omer road. [A.W.T.]
SINCLAIR, JOHN, born near Edinburgh in
1790 was instructed in music from childhood,
and while still young joined the band of a Scotch
regiment as a clarinet player. He also taught
singing in Aberdeen, and acquired sufficient
means to purchase his discharge from the regi
ment. Possessed of a fine tenor voice, he was
desirous of trying his fortune upon the stage,
came to London and appeared anonymously as
Capt. Cheerly in Shield's ' Lock and Key ' at
the Haymarket, Sept. 7, 1810. His success led
to his becoming a pupil of Thomas Welsh. He
was engaged at Covent Garden, where he appeared
Sept. 30, 1811, as Don Carlos in Sheridan and
Linley's 'Duenna.' He remained there for seven
seasons, during which he had many original parts.
He was the first singer of the still popular reci
tative and air 'Orynthia,' and 'The Pilgrim of
Love ' in Bishop's ' Noble Outlaw,' produced
April 7,1815. He also sang originally in Bishop's
'Guy Mannering* and 'The Slave,' and Davy's
' Rob Roy,' and acquired great popularity by his
performance of Apollo in ' Midas.' In April
1 8 1 9 he visited Paris and studied under Pellegrini,
and thence proceeded to Milan and placed him-
496
SINCLAIR.
self under Banderali. In May 1821 he went to
Naples, where he received advice and instruction
from Rossini. In 1822 he sang, mostly in Rossini's
operas, at Pisa and Bologna. In 1823 he was
engaged at Venice, where Rossini wrote for him
the part of Idreno in ' Semiramide.' After sing
ing at Genoa he returned to England, and re
appeared at Covent Garden, Nov. 19, 1823, as
Prince Orlando in ' The Cabinet ' ; his voice and
style having greatly improved. He continued
at the theatre for a season or two ; in 1828 and
1829 was engaged at the Adelphi, and in 1829-30
at Drury Lane. He then visited America ; on his
return retired from public life, and died at Mar
gate, Sept. 23, 1857. [W.H.H.]
SINFONIE-CANTATE. The title of Men
delssohn's Lobgesang or Hymn of Praise (op. 52).
The term — accurately ' Symphonie-Cantate' — is
due to Klingemann, according to Mendelssohn's
own statement in his published letter of Nov. 1 8,
1840. Mendelssohn was so much in love with it
as to propose to bestow it also on the ' Walpurgis-
night' (see the same letter and that to his
mother of Nov. 28, 1842). That intention was
not however carried out. [G.]
SINGAKADEMIE. [See after SINGING.]
SINGER'S LIBRARY, THE. A collec
tion of Part-songs, Glees, and Choruses, edited
by Mr. Hullah, and published by Addison & Co.,
and by Ashdown & Parry successively. 107
numbers have been issued in all, besides 50 of
a ' Sacred series.' [G.]
SING. SINGING. 'To sing ' is to use the
voice in accordance with musical laws. 'Singing '
is a musical expression of thought and feeling
through the medium of the voice and the organs
of speech generally, by means of two technical
operations — Vocalisation (the work of the vowels),
and Articulation (.that of the consonants).
A passing word on the meaning and nature of
music will hardly be out of place, as from con>
mon English parlance it might be often inferred
that singing is distinct from music, and that
' music ' means instrumental music only.
'Music' may be accepted to signify sounds in
succession or combination1 regulated by certain
natural and artificial laws, the result of which
has been the establishment of a series of these
sounds (called a Scale) having certain proportions
to, and relations with, each other, and being sus
ceptible of combinations capable of affording deep
emotion.
The effect of abstract music — that is, music
without words— upon the soul, though vague,
weird, and (indefinable, is so incontestable and
all-powerful, that its immediate origin in nature
itself can hardly for a moment be doubted.
Musical combinations and progressions seem at
times to recall something that does not belong to
the present order of things, and to inspire almost
a conviction that in another existence only, will
the full scope and significance of abstract music
be understood.
l G. A. Macfarren, Rudiments of Harmony.
SINGING.
From the time of man's first awakening- to the
influence of that which was not purely animal,
or at least from the date of the earlier forms of
organisation and civilisation, it is probable that
singing in some form has had its place, as an
individual solace, or as a convenient means of
expressing a common sentiment, either in war-
cries (afterwards war-songs) or in addresses to
the deities or idols (afterwards chants and
hymns).
Much has been said of the ' language of music.'
This is but a rhetorical figure. Language is
definite and states facts, the significance of which
will depend upon the greater or less sensitiveness
of the hearer. Music does precisely what words
do not do. It represents a state of thought and
feeling, more or less continuous, awakened by
the statement of facts — a brooding over what
has been said after the words are supposed to
have ceased. Hence the propriety of prolonging
syllables and repeating words, which the cynic
ally disposed are often inclined to ridicule as
opposed to reason and common sense. This in
clination to ignore the high office of music (that
of expounding what passes in the mind and soul)
is one great cause of the frequent tameness of
English singing ; and this same tameness it is that
in reality makes singing at times ridiculous and
opposed to reason and common sense. And if this
higher view of music in singing is not to be taken
—if all that is to be looked for is a rhythmical
tune — then by all means let it be played upon an in
strument, as the intonation will be safe, provided
the instrument be in tune; and the head may nod,
and the feet may tap, the ear will be tickled and
the soul unruffled. Besides, the power of using
the voice for the purpose of communicating ideas,
thoughts and feelings, and of recording facts and
events (to be set down in characters, and thus
transmitted from generation to generation), being
a special gift to the human race, and the attri
bute which most thoroughly separates man from
the lower animal tribe, the inane warbling of a
tune is an anomaly.
It scarcely matters which of the many theories
may be the right one of the origin of musical
sound, that is to say, of the manner in which
it first presents itself to the ear. Any continuous
sound in . nature may call our appreciation into
activity. It is certain that it appeals to some
thing in our inmost nature which responds as
directly to it, and that its effect is a reality;
otherwise it could not take its active part in
the expression of thought and feeling, or rather
be, as it is, the real manifestation or represen
tation of a state of thought and feeling only
suggested by words. Its appreciation by the
mind and soul through the medium of the ear
cannot well be a matter of development, but is
rather a revelation, from the simple fact that it
is distinguished from noise by the isochronism of
vibration ; and the difference between the two
could not but be marked the moment it pre
sented itself, as a brilliant colour, distinguished
from surrounding neutral tints, at once attracts
the eye. The manner in which a musical sound
SINGING.
arrests the attention of a child too young to
understand, or of an animal that is supposed not
to reason, is a strong proof of its being a special
sense of which we shall perhaps know more in
another state of existence. Some sort of lan
guage, we may conclude, came first, and syllables
will have been prolonged for the sake of emphasis.
The continuous note having presented itself
through some sound in nature, the power of imi
tation by the voice would be recognised. Ehythm,
the innate sense of accent — the spirit of metre, as
time is the letter — will also have been awakened
by some natural sound, such as the slow dropping
of water, or the galloping of an animal. The
ideal pendulum once set going within us, words
would adapt themselves to it, and poetry, or at
least verse, would come into being. The sub
stitution of a musical note for the simple pro
longation of the spoken sound would not fail to
take place in due time. With the awakening of
a purer religious feeling, the continuous note
would be found a suitable means of keeping
together large numbers in singing chants and
hymns, the splendour of many voices in unison
would be felt, and ecclesiastical music would
assume something of a definite form.
The stages in the rise of music may have been,
therefore, as follows : first, nature's instruments —
the cleft in the rock, the hole in the cabin, the
distant trickling water, or the wind blowing into
a reed ; then the imitation of these sounds by
the voice, followed by the imitation of these and
the voice by artificial instruments. Again, the in
creased accuracy of artificial instruments imitated
by the voice ; and finally the power of expression
of the voice imitated by instruments, vocal and
instrumental music aiding each other.
An idea of what remote nations may have done
in the way of music can only be gathered from
representations of instruments and obscure re
cords of the various periods, and these indica
tions are naturally too vague for any precise
estimate to be formed, but there is no reason to
imagine that it reached a high point of develop
ment with them. A painting on plaster in the
British Museum, taken from a tomb at Thebes,
and reproduced in Mr. William Chappell's
valuable History of Ancient Music, represents a
party of comely Egyptian ladies, about the time
of Moses, enjoying some concerted music. Three
are playing upon instruments of the guitar or
lute kind, a fourth upon a double tibia, while a
fifth appears to be beating time by clapping her
hands. If domestic music was customary so far
back, why was the wonderful development of
modern times so long in being brought about ?
Even the Greeks, with all their boundless love
for, and appreciation of, the beautiful, and their
power of its reproduction, cannot be supposed
to have gone far in the cultivation of music.
Mostof their 'modes' are unsatisfactory to modern
ears, and are not in harmony with cultivated
nature. Their use of music seems to have been
to form an accompaniment to oratory and to
furnish rhythmical tunes for dancing. With
their voices they seem to have been inclined at
VOL. nr. PT. 3.
SINGING.
497
times to indulge in mass of sound rather than
music properly so called, if we consider Plu
tarch's warning to his disciples against indulg
ing in too violent vociferation for fear of such
calamitous consequences as ruptures and con
vulsions.1 The student then, as at the present
day, apparently took upon himself to make all
the noise he could against the advice of his in
structors. But this is not important to the
present purpose. It is enough that we know
with tolerable certainty that we are indebted to a
long line of pious and learned men for the gradual
development of the material with which we have
to work. The spread of Christianity required
that church music should be purified and put
into something like form. This was commenced
by St. Ambrose in the latter part of the 4th cen
tury, his work being continued and amplified
two centuries later by St. Gregory. For the
gradual development of music see the articles on
PLAIN-SONG and SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION.
Down to Palestrina's time melody had been
held of too little account by theorists. This great
reformer knew, beyond all others, how to re-vivify
dry contrapuntal forms with music in its great
and ultimate capacity as a manifestation of
thought and feeling, and thus brought to its
gorgeous perfection the Polyphonic school, soon
to be thrust aside, never, perhaps, to re-appear
in its integrity, but to assert its great master's
mighty spirit, later on, in the works of those of
his successors who were capable of receiving it.
In early times very great things had been
done in England, and this almost independently
of external help, from early in the I5th century.
But there is an English part-song, a canon, or
round, which has been placed by all the foremost
critics early in the 1 3th century. [See SCHOOLS OF
COMPOSITION, Sect. XVI.] Very early mention,
of English part-singing in the north of England
is made by Gerald Barry or Giraldus Cambrensis
(see Chappell's 'Music of the Olden Time').
This is borne out by the fact of the fineness of
the natural voices in the northern and midland
counties at the present time, and the aptitude
of the inhabitants for choral singing. Down to
the end of the i6th century, singing as an in
dependent art, solo singing, had been held of
little account, and had been the vocation almost
exclusively of troubadours and other unscientific
(though often sympathetic) composers of popular
music. Its great impulse was given by the crea
tion of the opera out of an attempt towards the
close of the i6th century, on the part of a little
knot of disciples of the Renaissance, to. revive
the musical declamation of the Greek Drama. The
result was not what they intended, but of vastly
wider scope than they could have anticipated. In
oonnection with this movement was the name of
Vincenzo Galilei, the father of the great astro
nomer. These initiatory efforts and their great
and speedy outcome are exhaustively set forth
in the very comprehensive article on OPERA in
this Dictionary. From these small beginnings,
a few cantatas accompanied by a single instru-
* Gordon Holmes, Vocal Physiology and Hygi&ne, p. 23.
Kk
498
SINGING.
ment, we have the magnificent combination of
music, poetry, and scenery of the present day.
Though in the music of Palestrina the doctrine
is exemplified and carried to its conclusion, that
to be truly beautiful Polyphonic music must be
melodious in all its parts, still this form was im
practicable for the purpose immediately in hand.
In all times of reaction the vibration of the chain
of events throws it far out of its centre. Hence
the almost immediate abandonment of the Poly
phonic in favour of the Monodic form, instead of
a healthy combination of the two.
The first true Italian opera was the ' Euridice'
of Giacopo Perl, given in 1600 on the occasion of
the marriage festivities of Henry IV. of France
with Maria de' Medici. The first result of the
movement was the recitative, in something very
like its present form ; and in no other form can
the various phases of the changing passions and
affections be adequately expressed. But the out
cry against the so-called interruption of dramatic
action by the introduction of the aria, set con
certed piece, and formal chorus, is only reasonable
when directed against the abuse of these means of
expression so legitimate in their proper place and
at their proper time. In every-day life (the prin
ciples of which, in an exalted and artistic form,
must be the basis of all dramatic action), events,
though they succeed each other quickly, have
their moments, if not of repose, at least of the
working out of their immediate consequences,
and these give the opportunity for the expression
of the (for the time) dominant state of thought
and feeling. Even musical decoration (of which
later), wisely chosen and put together, adds im
mensely to the general significance. What then,
besides the creation of opera, were the causes of
the great development of the art of singing in
Italy, its stage of perfection for a time, and its
deterioration — let us trust for a time also? Italy,
inheriting the proud position, from Greece, of
foster-mother to the arts, could not neglect music
as one of her foster-children. But while other
countries vied with her, and at times surpassed
her, in musical science, the tide of vocal sound,
the power of using the voice, could not but flow
into the channel prepared for it by nature and
art. The gradual evolution of the Italian out of
the Latin language, the elimination of every hard
sound, where practically consistent with the exi
gencies of articulation, and its refinement to a
state of almost perfect vocal purity, brought
about a facility in producing vocal sound pos
sessed by other nations only in so far as their
respective tongues contain the elements of the
Italian. The Italian language is almost entirely
phonetic, and is pre-eminent in the two respects
of vocal purity and amount of vocal sound. Its
vowels are not only Italian ; they are the pure
elements of language in general, resembling in
idea the painter's palette of pure colours, and
offering therefore the material by which to gauge
the greater or less purity of other languages.
A short enquiry into the difference between
speaking and singing in the five languages to
which the largest amount of vocal music has been
SINGING.
composed, namely Italian, Latin, French, Ger
man, and English, will not be out of place. Of
all languages, the Italian is most alike in singing
and speaking — English the least. The four
essential points of difference between speaking
and singing are, first and foremost, that in
speaking (as in the warbling of almost all birds)
the isochronism of vibration is never present for
a period long enough to make an appreciable
musical note. A sympathetic speaking voice is
one whose production of tone most nearly ap
proaches that of the singing voice, but whose
inflexions are so varied as to -remove it entirely
from actual music. The word ' Cant' not improb
ably has its origin in puritanical sing-song speak
ing, and the word has been transferred from the
manner to the matter, and applied to hypocritical
expression of sanctity or sentiment. In sing
song speaking the exact opposite of the above
combination is generally found — namely, an ap
proximation to musical notes, and an abomin
able tone-production. The second distinguishing
point is the fact that in ordinary speaking little
more than one third (the lower third) of the
vocal compass comes into play, while in singing
the middle and upper parts are chiefly used. A
tenor with a vocal compass of
will speak principally upon the part of the voice
indicated by the crotchets, and most voices will
end their phrases (when not interrogative) with
a drop to the lowest sound that the vocal organ
will produce, a sound lower in most cases than
would be attempted as a note, basses and con
traltos sometimes excepted. If the tenor were
to speak as high as middle C he would be speak
ing in a decidedly loud voice, if he spoke
naturally. The third point of difference, and
that which most especially distinguishes singing
from speaking, in English, is that short syllables
(that is to say with the accent falling on the
concluding consonant) cannot exist, as such, since
the accent in singing is upon the vocal portion
of the syllable. (See double vowels, later.) This,
indeed, is the case in reading Italian, and even
in carefully speaking it. Lastly, singing tends
to preserve intact the relative purity of a lan
guage ; speaking, to split it up into dialects and
peculiarities.
Italian, then, takes the first position as having
the purest vocal sounds and the largest amount
of vowel. Latin, as sung, comes next. Its
vowels are the same, but it has more conson
ants. The classification of French and German
requires qualification. In amount of vocal sound
French takes the third place, the custom of
pronouncing, in singing, the (otherwise) mute
syllables preventing consonants from coming
together, and words from ending with hard con
sonants, but the quality of some of the vowels
requires very great care to prevent its marring
the pure emission of the voice. The proper
management of the final n and m must be also
SINGING.
closely studied. A great quality in the French
language, as sung, is the fact that the amount of
vocal sound is always at the same average. No
sudden irruption of a mass of consonants, as in
German or English, is to be feared. In vocal
purity, though not in amount of vocal sound,
German takes precedence of French, as containing
more Italian vowel, but it is at times so encum
bered with consonants that there is barely time
to make the vowel heard. The modified vowels
u, o and a are a little troublesome. The most
serious interruption to vocal sound is the articu
lation of cli followed by s, or worse still, of s by sch.
But if the words are well chosen they flow very
musically. The first line of Schubert's Standchen
' Leise flehen meine Lieder ' is a good example ;
all the consonants being soft except the /. In
contrast to this we have 'Fliisternd schlanke
Wipfel rauschen' with thirty -one letters and only
nine vowels. But perhaps the very worst phrase
to be found set to music in any language, and
set most unfortunately, occurs in the opera of
'Euryanthe/ In the aria for tenor, ' Wehen mir
Liifte Euh,' the beautiful subject from the over
ture is introduced thus :
Allegro.
SINGING.
499
3
Se - lig - keit dicb fass' ich kaum
As this subject is to be executed rapidly the g and
k are not easy to get in in time. Then come td ;
then cli and / together ; then ss. A jump of a
major 6th on the monosyllable ich with its close
vowel and the transition from ch to Jc on the Eb
are a piling of Pelion on Ossa in the creation of
difficulty, which could have been avoided by ar
ranging the syllables so that the moving group
of notes might be vocalised. And this passage
is the more remarkable as coming from one who
has written so much and so well for the voice ;
namely, Weber.
Polyglot English requires more careful analysis
than any other language before it can be sung,
on account of the nature of its vowel-sounds
and the irregularity of its orthography, conse
quent upon its many derivations. Its alphabet
is almost useless. There are fourteen different
ways (perhaps more) of representing on paper
the sound of the alphabetical vowel I. There
are nine different ways of pronouncing the com
bination of letters ougk. The sound of the
English language is by no means as bad as it is
made to appear. No nation in the civilised
world speaks its language so abominably as the
English. The Scotch, Irish and Welsh, in the
matter of articulation, speak much better than
we do. Familiar conversation is carried on in
inarticulate smudges of sound which are allowed
to pass current for so/mething, as worn-out shil
lings are accepted as representatives of twelve
pence. Not only are we, as a rule, inarticulate,
but our tone-production is wretched, and when
English people begin to study singing, they are
astonished to find that they have never learned
to speak. In singing, there is scarcely a letter
of our language that has not its special defect or
defects amongst nearly all amateurs, and, sad to
say, amongst some artists. An Italian has but
to open his mouth, and if he have a voice its pas
sage from the larynx to the outer air is prepared
by his language. We, on the contrary, have to
study hard before we can arrive at the Italian's
starting-point. Besides, we are as much troubled
as Germans with masses of consonants. For ex
ample, ' She watched through the night/ * The
fresh streams ran by her.' Two passages from
Shakespeare are examples of hard and soft words.
The one is from King Lear, 'The crows and
choughs that wing the midway air.' In these
last five words the voice ceases but once, and
that upon the hard consonant t. The other
sounds are all vocal and liquid, and represent
remarkably the floating and skimming of a bird
through the air. The other is from Julius Caesar,
' I'm glad that my weak words have struck but
thus much fire from Brutus.' The four hard
short monosyllables, all spelt with the same
vowel, are very suggestive.
All these difficulties in the way of pronuncia
tion can be greatly overcome by carefully analys
ing vowels and consonants ; and voice production,
that difficult and troublesome problem, will be
in a great measure solved thereby, for it should
be ever borne in mind by students of singing, as
one of two golden precepts, that a pure vowel
always brings with it a pure note — for the simple
reason that the pure vowel only brings into play
those parts of the organs of speech that are
necessary for its formation, and the impure
vowel is rendered so by a convulsive action of
throat, tongue, lips, nose or palate.
In studying voice-production let three experi
ments be tried, (i) Take an ordinary tumbler
and partially cover its mouth with a thin book.
Set a tuning-fork in vibration and apply the
flat side to the opening left by the book, alter
ing the opening until the note of the fork is
heard to increase considerably in volume. When
the right-sized opening is found, the sound of
the fork will be largely reinforced. In like
manner, in singing, the small initial sound
produced by the vibrating element of the voice-
organs is reinforced by vibrations communi
cated to the air contained in the resonance
chambers. (2) Next take an ordinary por
celain flower-vase. Sing a sonorous A (Italian)
in the open, on the middle of the voice, then
repeat the A with the mouth and nose inserted
in the flower-vase, and the vowel-sound will be
neutralised, and the vibration to a great extent
suffocated. In like manner the sound which has
been reinforced by the good position of some of
the resonance chambers may be suffocated and
spoiled by a bad position of any one of the re
maining ones. These two experiments, simple as
they are, are conclusive. (3) The third, less
simple, consists in whispering the vowels. The
five elementary sounds of language (the Italian
vowels) will be found in the following order,
I, E, A, 0, U, or vice versa, each vowel giving
a musical note dependent entirely upon the
Kk2
500
SINGING.
resonance of the chambers, the larynx giving no
musical sound, but only a rush of air through the
glottis. I gives the highest sound and U the
lowest, the pitch of the notes being fixed by
Helmholtz.1 The importance of these three
experiments consists in their clearly showing
how the smallest deviation from a certain posi
tion produces a marked change of resonance in
the note, and an alteration in the colour of the
vowel-sound.
The subject of Analysis of Language, so ex
haustively treated by Professor Max Miiller in
connexion with ethnological research, and very
critically entered into by Mr. Ellis in ' Speech
in Song,' for the purpose of aiding the singer, is
a very large one, and the following diagram of
vowel- sounds, and table of consonants, are
SINGING.
designed only to bring immediately under notice
in a concentrated form the connexion between
pure vowel-formation and articulation, and pure
voice-production, and treat only of the principal
sounds of the five languages already enumerated,
as they must be sung.
The Italian vowels will be the starting-point,
because they are the pure elementary sounds of
language in general. On the line of the Phonic
circle will be found all the vowel-sounds in the
formation of which there is no initial contrac
tion of the edge of the lips and no action of
the point of the tongue. These sounds are
placed in the order of vocal colour, and the
numbers represent their importance for singing.
The order of vowel-formation, in accordance with
whispered vowel-sound, is as follows.
12 e18
u"
OKDEK OF WHISPEKED VOWEL-FOEMATION.
[For Equivalents, see Table opposite.]
&u E* a" \iw 512 euis e^ v? A1
The three primary elementary sounds of vocal language A I U > ,
The two secondary elementary sounds of vocal language E 0 / Pr°n°unced as in Italian.
a8 English in bat.
ail French normal in malade.
a? English in past.
A English a in father.
Short English in but, same
sound long in vocal part of
er, ir, ur
Short English in met E /A
Close Italian and German ... 6
Close French e
Short English in tUl, bit . . . . i J
English e
(Initial consonant y, quickly
articulated.)
English au or aw.
Close Italian, English, Gsr-
man, and French.
English oo in boon.
(consonant w, quickly ar-
ticulated.)
English, short in good,conl',
and transient in ou, as in
out, and in ow, as in blow.
m
with!]? the
*f al a11 1?e s?und! on the line of the circle are Produced without any initial action of the
* th6 lip8' SU°h aCti°n OzUy taking place "* the formati(m of the sounds
In forming the German modified vowels 10,12
and 19, there is more or less contraction of the
inner edge of the lips. In the French u there is
great contraction of the outer edge of the lips, and
the end of the tongue presses slightly against the
inside of the under lip, making the exit for the
voice as small as is compatible with the emis
sion of a vowel-sound. The three primary vowels
A, I, U (Italian sound), give three definite,
ultimate positions of the resonance chambers.
A gives the most perfect tube, and therefore the
largest, roundest sound. It is a mid-position
with the best proportion of parts, and produces
the normal singing vowel, the most gratifyino- of
all the vowels as a question of sound. I has the
mouth filled with tongue, its root and the larynx
' See Ellis's translation.
being raised, affording a very small flat exit for
the voice, and requiring more lung pressure in
its emission. U gives the largest space in the
resonance chambers, the tongue being retracted
upon itself, with its root and the larynx drawn
down. With the contraction and protrusion of
the lips necessary to its formation it cannot be a
sonorous vowel. If these sounds are purely pro
nounced, without that baneful stiffening of the
root of the tongue so very general in this country,
the secondary sounds 4 and 5 can be found by
passing from one primary sound to another, and
the other gradations in the same way. The
sounds within the circle require the action of the
lips and tongue. The three sounds 8, 14, and 9,
above the circle, require care. The short flat
English a in ' bat,' as spoken, begets a position of
SINGING.
501
C3=S
:sl
^
a
S t-v
3 3 S
* a "Sio~
0
...
r c
O
e
^
-*
SS&Soa^S" '
. . .
sflrt
"^
o
o
o
g
£H
P
. 0 0>»
'it
•sifisSgsIgs-"
«•§ 5 '
3g a sg o
p3
si
hAA u £ i-,t ^>-:.^
PP3^£)
oS^^cB
S
0 (0
:O
ts
^
. . .
01
0 „,....
OJ
£
1 olSOoS . • . .
O
x:j3
« 3 «
O
2 cuo S 'o ... . .
O rt,Q •
*o
•«a
JO -ta
u
^3
O
gg« feel's oggl • •
O • • • • •
e>
• • •
c^
£
C 0^c3 &*,„ o^A-^ « . .
1=1 OO . .
o o
•tS
^3
HH
2 S
5
1 ^
ro
t-
.-
| g^
1 _K '
s si 1 1
O
*K
cu
IS 03 • • • •
•i^sJJo^
^•g^3
Illggl
r^j
P
0
2
1 t- tj.s t, £ ....
•8-3
CO .
(=4
£ &?^S ....
1— \
o
HH >O
.S § 8
ogl'8-
iJ
!-
M
1 — 1
s
^5 "a>
0 = S §.g
te
g
§
o
O
W
p.g-^'C «
.2,8 « Sis -S
,o.
t
'•%
ifl
>
O
s
K £
G *•
- S t- <D
3
1-5
s
^ • % % $-5 gS • • •
toiS
S tfi
fljtfl(-<O , OTSr-jCt*
W
«
<5
. u St: o,p,'a> . . .
§ 1
|° 853 g S£S^S^ I
P
0
^
OS 9
v v
P
A g
1 £
®
[_
£3
5§
w v<
%«?% .
«
f»,
1 1
121 g
M
<v 3 v $
— . 0.' Pi«3 • .
w
w
0
: § I'"
O te
l> |
t* d
« ;-
fe ""^
^;
K
W
H
EH
O
Q
fe
O
i _. t>» s y E
' '^ o E Sm
in
Ct
1 ^ «
O4 T-1 • • .
ts
h
<)
0
S ft]
a 0 S.S
IN
O
iJ
<;
^
a £
>>,.,£! i§-fi^
g'5 ;
o
O
S §
'»S--^io 3S |'3g
£*'§
o.§ 1
t-1
O -<
'
3 * * "
H
J • 3 0 0
w 1
ssg-d«5»as^
"cSja
S3 c
'Ti.
03
» • •
0) 3*-« " "
> wft ,
H
«
*t1
o
a
s
Q
i — i
|S
P
O
PM
iJ
<1
•
b-
C-l^o
1-3
i -S fe" 3 fc
QJ
^-^
U
pr) ^52*S^^^?
^
CO
t_ i P5 rt S_oT* • •
e £••§
11 —
0)
•2
O
o
. .
i
•s» •£
i. G -w «
i— i
i-q
O
tH
c3
* •
o.£.«"o"o
z;
r-i-i
o
3 1
O.O .
g O «G (Q U C
H-1
o
Is
J3
*= S1
S-l
r- °*
•° «•••=! B*a O.P4U °
^^ | .IS
fe
"o
d||||
a>
^ s
L V2,-^
J2
•^•H r* c e
, — ,
•Q^.O^'SP S S
0
ci oj.S oj » "
g
> S «
<c
l-f
g V
s a £ 0,0 •
I tt<5 Qs
V
"3 P. ....
M
a'-fi § jt'S'-^'s-S
^j HniS S c'S^s'S'o £
K 3"
^ ^
*
a
^" *° a
***•«*
•»
„.
g1 e 1
•
•
• •
-I*U • • •
1 I S'e
HH
,J '
•
•
C3
• •
* •
•si '.
si
C-T W
ill II till
i .
I life
S"33
*J3 e
f ia B
en O
£ &
Is
*:
w
m
S
GERMAN
w
0
< w :
M
i fc h
5
-
-
t
ENGLISH^
GERMA.N-
to
o
1
fe
1 V
1 J
y tlflllll :
502
SINGING.
the mouth incompatible with good voice-produc
tion, and it has to be slightly modified, without
however destroying its individuality, by making
that large pharynx so dear to those who have to
do with the voice. The French normal a is in
the same direction, but not quite so flat, while
the English a in ' past,' etc. brings us on the road
home to the normal vowel. With an assiduous
cultivation of the ear while studying positions,
and a careful avoidance of convulsion, and a
keen sense of how small a deviation from a gooc
position may entirely ruin a sound, there is no
reason why a good pronunciation of a foreign
language should be an insurmountable difficulty.
No. 6 is a vowel that must be well observed in
English singing ; also the fact that the difference
of position between short u7 and Aj is not very
great, while the difference of sound as a question ol
phonic beauty is about that of the two poles. But
a real difficulty is the management of our double
vowels. They must be treated and sung as given
in the Table of Vowel-sounds. The most trouble
some case is that of the combination ire. With
two notes to the second syllable of ' desire ' it is
very common to hear
•— X fi T
thy heart's de - - sA-iyers
This syllable must be rendered
da - - s A. - - lers
i. e. one inflected syllable, the inflection being got
over as quickly and smoothly as possible after the
two notes have been vocalised on the first com
ponent part of the i. The r having produced
the above inflexion, and having, in other cases
changed the sound of the vowel, we consider it
has done enough, and do not pronounce it at all
as a final. The mechanical formation of conso
nants might be considered for the most part
the same in civilised languages if all nations
spoke equally well. But we are sadly careless,
and in singing English perhaps the most serious
fault of all is the neglect of finals. We have so
many words, monosyllables especially, pronounced
precisely alike in all respects except the last con
sonant sound ; e. g.
babe
bade
bake
bale
bane
bass
bait
baize
hark life
heart lied
harp like
harm ljme
hard Hne
hearth light
Resulting in a live
senseless sound lithe
All resulting in without final. Kesulting in
bay without He without
final. final.
The last column brings to mind what is not un-
frequently heard in the oratorio of the Messiah —
' The people that walked in darkness have seen a
great lie.'
It is not at all unusual to hear the English T
and D pronounced with the under side of the
tongue. This gives something of a Somersetshire
— — _
—^—
• — 1
=3 i : :
— •- — jj
SINGING.
burr, and is adopted by the Italian actors when
they imitate the English. These consonants, in
English, must be pronounced with the upper side
of the point of the tongue, just under the ridge
terminating the vault of the hard palate in front.
The Italian T and D have the point of the
tongue lower down, fitting into the angle formed
by the teeth and gums. The importance of pro
perly pronouncing the nasals cannot be over
estimated. The necessary management of the
soft palate, and the general absence thereof,
rightly emphasised by Herr Behnke in his ' Me
chanism of the Human Voice,' was probably the
foundation of M. Wartel's system (pushed to
extremes) of vocalisation with the closed mouth.
The freedom required in opening the nasal pas
sages for these sounds is equally required to close
them when singing vowels. These sounds when
defective are often called nasal, when in fact
they are not nasal enough, and sometimes not at
all. It borders on the ridiculous to hear ' 0 for
the wigs of a dove.'
The mechanism of the Italian double consonants
will be facilitated by taking a Latin word, pectus,
for example, from which an Italian word, petto,
is derived. The double t will occupy exactly the
same space of time as the ct. This mechanism
has to be introduced into English where the final
of one word is the initial of another, e. g. ' when
near,' 'with thee,' 'all lost,' 'if fear.' These
details, though savouring of the instruction-book,
serve to point out how dependent voice-produc
tion and pronunciation are upon each other, and
also how great an advantage the Italians have
over other nations in the matter of language, and
how their school of singing must have been in
fluenced thereby. Mr. Ellis' s book, 'Speech in
Song,' should be read carefully by students of
singing.
Though foreign singers are often indistinct,
radical faults of pronunciation are rare with
them when singing their own language, and this
on account of the less complex character of their
respective tongues, and the greater simplicity of
their orthography. The difficulties of English, as
will be seen from the tables given, are consider
able, but this does not excuse the irritating indif
ference of many English amateurs and would-be
artists, in the matter of languages generally. It
is not at all unusual for a student when training
for a singer's career, to study a large amount of
foreign music, extending over a considerable time,
the words being always carefully translated to
him, the roots explained, and the analogies be
tween the foreign language and his own pointed
out, in the hope that at least a little might be
' picked up ' in the time, and yet, in the end, the
student shall exhibit total ignorance even of the
definite article. In some cases the pronunciation
has been more than fairly acquired, which makes
the other failure the more unpardonable. Nor
is the common utterance of blind prejudice par
ticularly edifying. It is frequently said, 'Oh
French is a horrible language to sing; it is all
nasal 1 ' or ' German is a wretched language to
sing ; it is all guttural ! ' A language is in a
TABLE OF CONSONANTS.
503
SINGLE SOUNDS.
Total Silence.
Temporary Inter
nal Vocal Sound.
Continuous Vocal Sound.
CO
Mouth
hermet-i Lips as before.
Lips as before.
Hi
ically closed by j Posterior nares
Posterior nares
M
lips. Posterior do. Vocal cords
open. Vocal cords
W
nares closed. Vo- vibrating :—
vibrating free
1^
cal cords inac
ly:-
Formed from w20 :—
tive : —
P
B
M
W
Mouth hermet
ically closed in
Tongue as at T.
Posterior nares
Tongue aa at T.
Posterior nares
Back of tongue
drawn down de-
.
ternally by edge of
do. Vocal cords
open. Vocal cords
q' taching sides of
TO
pj
tongue cleaving
to inside of upper
vibrating. Lips
apart : —
vibrating free
ly:—
P tongue from teeth g
a? and guma. Point ^
o
teeth. Posterior
•/
1 onlv attached. K
nares closed. Lips
aj
r^
Vocal cords vi
O
3
apart. Vocal
cords inactive : —
3
brating freely : —
O
T
D
&
N
L
^4
Internal mouth
Mouth as at K.
Mouth as at K.
Back of tongue o
closed by contact
Posterior nares
Posterior nares
and soft palate P
of back of tongue
do. Vocal cords
open. Vocal cords
nearly in contact.
and soft
palate.
vibrating :—
vibrating free
Voice passing ^
Posterior nares
ly :~
rs'
through nose and
00
closed. Fore part
mouth at the same :
jji
of tongue .free.
CO
time : —
^4
H
Vocal cords inac
^
Formed from /2 : —
pj
tive :—
T
K
HardG
NG
?-,
M and N
Y J
(English, Ger
(English, Ger
(English and
02
(French).
(English, (Italian
man, Italian and
man, Italian and
German).
French U in and
French.
C before
French. Before a,
mouiller.) German).
a, o, u.
French
o,u).
g and .git).
Noifes. Hard.
Buzzes. Soft.
Forcible expulsion of air between lower lip
Gentler expulsion of air. Vocal cords vibrat
DENTO-
and upper teeth. Vocal cords inactive : —
ing freely. Other conditions as before :—
LABIALS.
F, PH
V
(soft/, and ph in 'Stephen').
Forcible expulsion of air between point of
Gentler expulsion of air. Vocal cords vibrat
DENTO-
tongue and edge of upper teeth. Smothered
sihilatinn Vor.al nrvrrls ina^tivfi • —
ing freely. Other conditions as before. Ger
man w • —
LINGUALS.
SIBILANTS,
LINGUAL.
SIBILANTS,
LlNGTJO-
PALATAL.
TH
(final, and generally beginning nouns, verbs,
adjectives and adverbs).
Forcible expulsion of air between flattened
point of tongue and angle formed by upper teeth
and gums. Vocal cords inactive : —
S
(soft C English and French before e, i and y.
French cj.
Same operation as above between body of
tongue and hard palate :—
SH
(su in ' sure,' ' -tion.' Italian sc before e and i ;
German sch ; French ch).
th
(final followed by e. Generally beginning arti-
cles, pronouns, prepositions and conjunctions.
Gentler expulsion of air. Vocal cords vibrat
ing freely. Other conditions as before : —
S
(English, German, French and Italian, z Eng.
and French).
Same operation as above. Vocal cords vibrat
ing. Other conditions as before : —
su
(in ' measure.' Should be ZH, ' -sion.' French
./and soft g).
"Upper part of point of tongue vibrating
against front ridge of roof of the mouth :—
M
t— l
>
SOFT
ASPIRATE.
Breath rather forcibly expelled from
lungs. Vocal cords somewhat brought HABD
together. No voice :— ASPIKATE
H LlNGUO-
(should be the same in all languages).
^Breath expelled between middle of tongue
and roof of mouth :—
CH
SOFTENED
PALATAL
ASPIBATE.
(English, German, French. Italian at the PALATAL. (German after e, i, a, Q, u, in front of
end of interjections).
uvula).
(German final).
HABD
ASPIRATE
PALATAL.
COMPOUND SOUNDS.
CH
(German after a, o, u, behind uvula).
English CH and Italian C before e, i, formed of TSH.
English and Italian soft G formed of D and ZH or D and French j or soft g.
German and Italian single Z, and German initial C before e and i, composed of T and S, and L
Italian double Z in 'mezzo' and derivatives and some other words, formed of D and soft S or Z.
X formed of KS.
Italian gl before i and gn before a, e, i, o, u, formed of English consonant y preceded by I and n.
French gn in Seigneur, ditto.
Italian and German qu, same as English. _ __
504
SINGING.
great measure what a singer makes it. If our
language, as it is too often spoken or sung,
contained no more objectionable sound than a
Hanoverian lady's guttural, we should be very
fortunate.
Enough has been said to show that all the
purer and more sonorous parts of language in
general are Italian. We thus arrive at a first
reason why singing should have naturally flour
ished in Italy. The unsatisfactory treatment of
our own language is a first reason why it does
not flourish as it ought with us. In using foreign
languages we dread affectation, and are glad to
comfort ourselves with the reflection that the
world at large will not recognise our defects.
Whom ought we really to consider — the many
who may not recognise the defects, or the one or
two natives who may be present ? Dread of affect
ation must be got over by careful study and
habit.
From the foregoing tables it will be seen that,
for singing purposes, the elements of language
are reducible to a small compass. It is very
important that a standard of pronunciation should
be established, and individual peculiarities eli
minated from language that is to be sung. In
our daily intercourse we tolerate and involun
tarily approve peculiarities (provided they are
not too glaring) in those with whom we are in
sympathy, the peculiarities themselves bringing
the individuality home to us. But the ear is
not then seeking the gratification of a special
sense possessed by almost every human being
in his different degree, and by many ani
mals, — susceptibility to the charm of musical
sound. The moment we come to music, its
catholicity requires that its rendering should be
unalloyed by anything that can interrupt its
flow into the soul. Individualities of timbre
must of course exist, but there is that within us
which accepts and morally assimilates these
characteristics ; provided, again, they are not
so marked as to counterbalance other and
fitting qualifications. Peculiarity and indistinct
ness of pronunciation are two great and well-
known barriers to the adequate enjoyment of
vocal music ; the first because it is constantly
drawing the attention from what ought to be
almost ethereal, and the second because it sets
the hearer thinking what it is all about, and the
moment he begins to think he ceases to feel.
Another cause for the developement of sing
ing in Italy was the necessity for finding the
best singers for the Papal service, in which
females were not permitted to take part. Boys
were employed as in our own cathedrals, and
counter-tenors, or falsetto- singers, chiefly Span
iards. But as solo-singing increased in import
ance, the counter-tenors no doubt began to
realise the fact that by cultivating the falsetto
they were ruining their more robust registers,
and the fact became more and more patent that
as soon as a boy was beginning to acquire some
cultivation of taste his voice left him. This led
to the custom of preventing the voice from
breaking, by artificial means. In the case of
SINGING.
these singers there was hardly any cessation
in the course of study from early to more ma
ture years. There was not the total stoppage
of work, the enforced interval of two or three
years for the voice to settle, and the recom
mencement under totally different conditions.
The long course of uninterrupted study would
bring the art of vocalisation to perfection, and
these perfect singers, who were afterwards intro
duced upon the stage, became, as the art pro
gressed, models of style and execution (according,
be it understood, to the taste of the period),
and furnished many of the best singing-masters.
The first victim of the brutal custom alluded
to was the Padre Rossini, admitted into the
Pontifical Chapel in 1601, and nearly the last
was Crescentini, who died in 1846. The last
Papal falsetto singer was Giovanni de Sanctos.
who died at Rome in 1625. In addition to
the influences already named, ecclesiastical au
thority would have its effect, at any rate in
the early stages of study, in exacting the neces
sary application on the part of students.
Subordination to teachers existed in times
gone by, and the gradual developement of
volume of voice and the power of exact execu
tion, without the sacrifice of quality, and the
cultivation of taste (the abstract of judgment, a
sense of proportion and fitness) were the results.
The observance of the second golden precept in
studying singing, ' Work for quality, and power
will take care of itself,' has not been sufficiently
carried out in later times.
At a not very remote time no females were
permitted to appear on the stage at Rome in
any entertainment, operatic, dramatic, or choro-
graphic, the singing parts being filled by the
best-looking artificial soprani and contralti that
could be found. It is an injustice to ascribe to
individuals of this class a deficiency, necessarily,
of intellectual power or of personal courage.
History sets this question quite at rest. Nor
are defects in the powers of articulation peculiar
to them. Not one in a hundred, scarcely, of
ordinary mortals is free from, some failure in this
respect.
Very little seems to be known about solo
singers before the beginning of the I7th century,
the period in fact at which they were really re
quired. Caccini, the composer, and his daughter
are said to have been both fine singers. The
monodic form growing with Caccini and his
immediate successors brought with it, of neces
sity, a corresponding growth of the vocal art.
The great stride made by Monteverde and Ca-
valli towards the modern opera, their amplifica
tion of the orchestra, and the improvement of
the recitative by Carissimi and others, gave so
great an impulse to the study of using the voice,
that in a comparatively short time there was
without doubt some very fine singing, if music of
the middle of the lyth century had adequate
interpretation ; and if not its continued produc
tion would speedily have come to an end.
Amongst the cantatas of Luigi Rossi in the
British Museum, is one in particular, ' Gelosia
SINGING.
SINGING.
505
(composed about 1640) requiring all the qualifica
tions of a fine singer — voice (tenore robusto, high
baritone, or mezzo-soprano), declamatory power,
pathos, and agility. Another, by Carissirai, ' Vit-
toria,' demands vigorous singing. The latter is
-well-known, and both are published amongst ' Les
Gloires de 1'Italie.' The dramatic force exacted by
a just rendering of the kind of music named, and
which had been naturally brought about by the
creation of the recitative, by degrees gave place to
a more mechanical style of singing. The constant
recitative became monotonous, and rhythmical
airs, more and more formal, came into vogue,
their formality being afterwards relieved by set
passages or divisions. The singers above referred
to brought their vocalisation to such a grade of
perfection and exactness that they must have
sung really with the precision of an instrument.
This wonderful power of exact execution culmin
ated in Porpora's famous pupils, Farinelli and
Caffarelli. [See those names.] It is said that
Porpora kept Caffarelli for five or six years to one
page of exercises and nothing else, and at the
end of the time told him he was the greatest
singer in Europe. This is of course an exaggera
tion, since such taste and style as those of Caffa
relli cannot be formed by a page of exercises ;
but it embodies the principle of slow patient
work, and of gradual development, instead of
the forcing of all the powers. Few are blest with
naturally perfect voices, and it is even probable
that Porpora did prescribe to Caffarelli a certain
set of exercises to be used daily. It is the con
stant practice of certain passages that overcomes
defects. The passages (some examples of which
are here given) in much of the music of that
date, especially that of Porpora, are really in
strumental passages, strongly resembling the
vocalizzi of the period [see SOLFEGGIO], and
possessing but little interest beyond the surprise
that their exact performance would create.
Artaxerxes.
Allegro assai.
tr
Siroe.
^ Alleqro.
>g^*
PORPORA.
Allegro.
- za ancor.
Adriano.
VERACINI.
mi.
Siroe.
Allegro.
PORPORA.
tr tr
A nau - fra - gar
tr tr
/>•
506
SINGING.
nau - fragar.
It would be impossible to sing this kind
of music accompanied by any great dramatic
action, since action would throw the voice off its
balance and do away with the exact execution
which was the main attraction of the music ;
thus by degrees a great deal of the singing will
have become unimpassioned, the singer will have
stood to sing his songs without troubling him
self to act, and the wonderful execution and the
peculiarity of the voices — many of which are said
to have been very fine, with a tone like that of a
highly developed boy's voice — will have exercised
a certain fascination over the hearer, and have
become for a time the fashion. One of the finest
of these singers was Pacchierotti, who with a
defective voice, possessed high intelligence, and
made himself a consummate artist ; the last heard
in England being Velluti (born 1781, died 1861 ;
in London with Mendelssohn in 1829), also a
highly finished artist, famous for his phrasing and
for the grace of his singing generally.
The music of Handel, Scarlatti and Hasse,
while mechanically difficult enough, called forth
broader artistic powers, possessed by these great
singers in an equal degree with mere agility,
when occasion required them ; and the names
of Farinelli, Caffarelli, Gizziello, Bernacchi, Car-
estini, Senesino, etc., and others, formed a bright
array of vocalists. About the same time the cele
brated Faustina (Mme. Hasse) and Cuzzoni were
most brilliant singers. Faustina is said to have
had such extraordinary powers of respiration
that it was supposed she could sing both inspiring
and expiring. Her agility was marvellous. Basses
were now recognised, amongst whom Boschi arid
Montagnana, with voices of large compass, were
very fine singers. The following extract from a
song sung by the latter requires exact intonation.
Adriano.
VERACINI.
chi di soffrlr.
In the latter half of the i8th century voices of
exceptional, in two cases almost phenomenal, com
pass appeared. That of Agujari, upon the testi
mony of Mozart, extended upwards to C in
altissimo. Another account gives her two fair
octaves, from A below the stave to A in alt
(which would be only the compass of a good
SINGING.
mezzo-soprano), but says that she had in early
youth another octave. Mozart, however, may be
trusted ; and as she was 27 when he heard her in
1770, and her early youth over, it is clear that she
had a remarkable compass. The very high part
of the voice may possibly have left her before she
was far advanced in years. In early life a very
large compass is not a great rarity. A male voice
in the writer's experience, soon after breaking,
could sound notes from A, ist space bass, to
treble C in alt, the upper octave and a half being,
ib is true, falsetto (using the word in its ordinary
acceptation, and not as applied to the middle
register). In about a year, as the lower registers
increased in firmness, nearly the whole of the
upper octave disappeared. Voices that can sound
three octaves are not very unusual, and such a
voice has-been met with in a boy; but a com
pass of two good octaves is a great gift. A
mezzo-soprano voice has been heard that could
touch G on the bottom line of the bass clef ;
not a usable note, but sufficiently defined to be
clearly recognised ; while a voice, undeniably
tenor in quality, had a compass from the same
note, to D above the bass stave, and no more.
These are freaks of nature. Young contraltos
frequently have a spurious upper octave which
disappears as the voice strengthens. Fischer,
the great German bass, had a compass of from
D below the bass stave to A above, an extra
ordinary range for a male voice without falsetto.
His organ must have been singularly powerful
and flexible. In Russia, bass voices reaching to
A or G below the bass stave are not uncommon,
but they have not generally a large compass.
A family of Russian Jews, of three generations,
sang together in London about the year 1843.
The grandfather, with a long patriarchal beard,
sang down to A below the bass stave, but he
had not many notes, and was in fact a contra-
basso. He only vocalised, and that in part-
music. Taking this low A as a starting-point,
and Agujari's high C as the other extreme, the
human voice has the astounding compass of
nearly five octaves and a half. Germany's first
great female singer, Mara, with a very beautiful
voice of 2 1 octaves, from low G to high E, must
have been one of the finest of these great singers.
The compass is that of a magnificent soprano
drammatico, and as she is said to have possessed
solid talent, and to have been a good musician,
she must have been splendid. Banti had most
probably about three octaves. She reached high
G, the voice being beautiful and her execution
perfect. Mrs. Billington, with German blood on
the father's side, was another example of large
compass from A to A, 3 octaves. Catalani, again,
had a beautiful voice up to high G, and marvellous
execution. In the present day, Carlotta Patti and
Miss Robertson are examples of high range.
In considering the large compass of some of the
voices just mentioned, it might seem marvellous
how so small an instrument can produce not only
so great a range of notes, but notes of so much
power. The investigations of Manuel Garcia,
1 Koyal Society's Proceedings, vol. vii ; Nov. 13, 1855.
SINGING.
Czermak, Dr. Mandl,1 Madame Seller,2 Dr.
Luschka,3 Dr. Morell Mackenzie,* Mr. Gordon
Holmes,5 and Herr Emil Behnke,6 have done a vast
deal to elucidate much that concerns the cognate
subjects of voice-production and of registers, and
to scatter to the winds untenable theories — such
for instance as that the varying pitch of notes is
the result of harmonics formed in the resonance-
chambers ; that the falsetto is produced by the
laryngeal sacculi acting like a hazel-nut made
into a whistle, etc. ; but the difficulties of ade
quate laryngoscopic observation prevent the
clearing up of many perplexing details. In con
sulting the above-mentioned works some confu
sion arises from a difference of nomenclature, not
only in the matter of registers, but of those all-
important anatomical items, the voice membranes,
variously called vocal cords, bands, ligaments,
lips, and reeds. In the latter case this is not
of so much importance, as it is easy to recognise
that they all refer to the same part ; but in naming
the registers, it makes all the difference whether
the term ' falsetto ' is used under the old ac
ceptation, or under that of Garcia, who applies it
to the middle register. The old terms, 'chest'
(open and closed), 'head,' 'mixed,' and 'falsetto'
—though objected to as unscientific and based
upon sensations and fancies — certainly give as
good an idea of the respective registers as the
newly-proposed terms, ' lower and upper thick,'
'lower and upper thin,' and ' small.' The terms
Voce di petto, or di testa, falsetto, Voce mista,
or Mezzo, voce; aprire and chiudere — to denote
the passing from what is called here the open to
the close chest register (to which Randegger's
terms 'lower and upper series of chest register'
correspond) — have been used by the Italians
through the whole time when the art of singing
was in a more prosperous condition than it is
now; and until undeniably better terms can be
found it is inexpedient, on the score of intelligi
bility, to quit the old ones. The term 'chest
register' applied to the series of tones produced
with the larynx drawn down towards the chest
by the sterno- thyroid muscles, and causing larynx
and chest to vibrate in one, is quite to the point.
' Open ' and ' close ' are applied to vowel-sounds,
and since the open and close chest-registers give
the same quality of tone as open and close vowels
— having, there is little doubt, the larynx in the
same condition in both cases — the terms are quite
legitimate. Again, ' falsetto/ when applied to a
register so different in tone from the chest voice
as to seem, in many cases, to belong to another
individual, or even another sex, is not at all an
inappropriate term. But though the falsetto
differs so entirely from chest-voice, it may be
used, if reached through the head -voice, in
diminishing a note to a point ; but only when,
by practice, the different registers are perfectly
blended. In some cases the falsetto is so strong
1 Hygiene de la Voix ; Paris and London, Bailliere & Fils.
2 Voice in Singing ; Philadelphia.
3 Der Kehlkopf des Menschen.
4 Diseases of the Throat ; Churchill.
5 Vocal Physiology and Hygiene.
6 Mechanism of the Human Voice ; Curwen & Sons.
SINGING.
507
as to be undistinguishable from head-voice, as
in some cases also a strong head-voice may in
the higher notes be mistaken for chest. Wachtel's
high notes were produced by a mixed chest and
head voice. How all these gradations are brought
about is not quite clear, but there seems no doubt
that attenuation of the vibrating element is
effected in each successive higher register, as
in a thinner string upon the violin ; and also
that in the case of falsetto, part of the voice-
membranes (or vocal cords) is shut off or 'stopped,'
either by a node, or by constriction of the complex
thyro-arytenoid muscles. If it should hereafter be
found that any part of these muscles is quite of the
nature of the tongue, with fibres running in many
different directions, and thus capable of being
brought to bear upon any point of the voice mem
branes, a good deal would be accounted for.
Notwithstanding difference of nomenclature,
Herr Behnke's work is a most welcome addition
to the practical literature on the subject. Apropos
of nomenclature generally, would not a standing
committee be advisable to settle points of this
kind from time to time? If a writer advances
an opinion, and there is reason to differ from it,
it is a long time before a counter-suggestion is
available. Whereas a friendly personal inter
change of ideas might speedily bring about a
satisfactory conclusion. This question might be
taken up by the Musical Association or the Royal
College of Music. But to resume.
After Catalani, the operatic style advanced in
the direction of dramatic force, and entered on
the golden era of united singing and acting, much
to the displeasure of the older critics, who de
lighted in singing unaccompanied by much ges
ticulation. Pasta may be said to have shown
the way to unite fine singing with classic acting,
so that the two should aid each other. Endowed
by nature with a harsh veiled voice, she worked
with prodigious determination to reduce it to
obedience, and at the same time made a special
study from antique sculpture of the most effec
tive gestures, and the classical mode of arranging
drapery. When nearly sixty she had still pre
served a wonderful power of mczza voce when
singing in private. One, who, like many Ger
mans, had great dramatic genius, but whose vocal
powers were chiefly of the declamatory kind,
created an immense sensation about 50 years ago,
wherever she appeared. This was Schrb'der-
Devrient, who created the part of Fidelio, and
sang it in the presence of the illustrious com
poser of that opera to his entire satisfaction.
A singer who held for some years the post of
reigning favourite was Malibran, a woman of
great genius, marred by a good deal of caprice.
Giulia Grisi, with less genius than Pasta and
Malibran, but with a lovely voice, great beauty,
and much natural talent, was as persistently re
cognised as queen of song, through a long series
of years, as any public favourite, with the ex
ception, perhaps, of Adelina Patti. She formed
one of the famous quartet with Rubini, Tam-
burini, and Lablache, Rubini on his retirement
being replaced by Mario. This quartet sang
508
SINGING.
together for many years, and were united by
such strong ties of friendship, and such absence
of anything in the shape of artistic jealousy, that
the perfection of the ensemble was at once their
own delight and that of their admirers. A very
fine contralto, Marietta Brambilla, sang about
the same time. Grisi had considerable versa
tility, singing Norma, Lucrezia Borgia, Ninetta
(in La Gazza ladra), Norina (in Don Pasquale),
Elvira (in I Puritani), all well. Contemporary
with Grisi was Persiani, a very charming singer
and actress, in spite of a not very pleasing voice
and a somewhat plain exterior. She could not
take such parts as Norma or Anna Bolena with
effect, but she sang with unaffected pathos, and
executed florid music very perfectly. After Grisi
and Persiani, Bosio and Piccolomini held a high
place in the artistic world, and Sontag, a graceful
and captivating singer, reappeared after some
years' retirement. Another great example of the
victory of Art over Nature was Malibran's sister
Pauline (Viardot), a woman of great genius with
a defective voice, who became a worthy repre
sentative of the great Garcia family. At the time
of the foundation of the second Opera House,
Co vent Garden, to which Grisi and Mario, and
Costa as conductor, transferred their services,
there appeared a star of great magnitude, of
whom so much had been heard as might have
endangered a first appearance. Perhaps, however,
no success was ever more complete than that of
Jenny Lind (Madame Golddchmidt). Her special
characters during her career in London were
Alice (Roberto il Diavolo), Maria (La Figlia
del reggirnento), Amina, Lucia, Susanna, and
similar parts, in which the softer attributes of
the female character predominate. And even
in those parts which were not her greatest suc
cesses she always did something better than it
had been done before. In Norma the cavatina
'Casta Diva' was sung by her with infinite pathos
and grace. There was a slight veil upon the
middle and lower part of the voice, but it was
only sufficient to give it substance. Her Alice
was an impersonation of the highest order. Seen
from a proscenium box at a distance of only a
couple of yards in the old Her Majesty's Theatre,
every look and gesture was reality. The scene
by the cross was one not to be easily forgotten.
The Bertram was the famous German bass,
Staudigl, who with very little help in the way
of stage paint, etc., contrived to give his usually
good-natured face an expression of stony fiend-
ishness that was actually appalling. With little
gesticulation he seemed really to have the power
of magnetising with his glance. Jenny Lind
had a great faculty of working up to a climax
with a minimum of apparent effort, and a maxi
mum of effect. Her execution was most per
fect, and her high notes rich and clear. In
the Figlia del Reggimento she gave a sudden
display of brilliant florid singing that was truly
marvellous. In the scene in which the aunt
is giving Maria a singing-lesson on an anti
quated tune, bored to death, and with her mind
wandering to the scenes of her former life, she
SINGING.
broke forth into a veritable flood of vocalisation ;
roulades, quickly reiterated notes, trills, etc., in
such rapid succession and for such a length of
time, that it was difficult to imagine where the
strength came from. It was quite a stroke of
genius, the more unexpected as occurring in one
of Donizetti's inferior operas. Jenny Lind was
also a great oratorio singer. [For her other great
operatic successes see vol. ii. p. 141.] Some
cadences of Mile. Lind's own, given here, are
examples of her powers of vocalisation. They
were not sung as mere passages of agility, but to
their absolute perfection of execution was added
an expressive significance which this wonderful
artist knew so well how to throw into everything
she sang. Two more examples will be found in
the article above mentioned.
(i) Lucia di Lammermoor.
cres
cen
do
(2) Beatrice di Tenda.
(3) Beatrice di Tenda.
f
f
SINGING.
SINGING.
509
Musical decoration, in the form of cadences or
passages of agility, adds much meaning to the
music in which it is judiciously introduced, and
as reasonable and as consonant with the
a
canons of art as architectural decoration. What
ever the origin or precise meaning of a trill may
be, its effect, in the right place and well ex
ecuted, is prodigiously fine. Indeed the result
of ornament is often greatly out of proportion to
its appearance. When the two sisters Marchisio
appeared at Milan about the year 1856 in ' Semi-
rauiide,' the soprano introduced a little passage
at the end of the air ' Bel raggio ' thus, —
qul a me ------- yer - r& *
and later, in the duet ' Ebben, a te, ferisci ' —
Allegro.
fa - - -
vor.
These passages do not look very much on
paper, but their effect, executed without the
smallest apparent premeditation, and with a
spontaneous dan de voix, was simply electric.
In the final air in ' Lucrezia Borgia,' in which
Lucrezia reproaches the Duke with causing the
death of her son, the long descending scales and
rising passages give immense vehemence to her
agony of grief, and form a striking contrast to the
measured sequential passages which Farinelli pro
bably sang without changing his position.
While Jenny Lind was achieving the success
we have described in the Haymarket, there ap
peared at the rival house in Covent Garden the
famous Alboni, a superb contralto, or rather
mezzo soprano, of considerable compass and great
flexibility. But during the very reign of the great
singers enumerated above there set in a dete
rioration in the art of singing. Its very perfection
at that time was, in a way, the first cause of its
1 i * »/
decadence. The singer had become all paramount-,
and opera had again drifted into convention
ality. Numbers of operas were brought out
that were weak imitations, first of good works,
and then of one another, written chiefly to afford
the singer the opportunity for display in arias of
stereotyped form encumbered by a great deal of
flimsy padding, and the higher forms of com
position were less and less to be found, until at
last, as Wagner says, the capacities of the orches
tra were almost entirely ignored, and it sank to
the level of a huge guitar. It rose afterwards, in
the hands of those who did not know how to
use it, to the height of a huge brass band. The
reaction was brought about with too much pride
and too little temper. The voice, from having
been almost exclusively considered, began to be
almost as exclusively ignored. As the new style
of music required more force than delicacy in its
execution, a much shorter and more superficial
artistic preparation was needed to give some
thing of a rendering. The possessor of a strong
voice, after a few months', instead of a few years'
work, entered upon the operatic career with
powers not half developed or brought under
control, and therefore unprepared to support the
greater strain brought to bear upon them. The
voice itself necessitated increased forcing to make
the required noise, and speedy deterioration was
the frequent result. Mara sang the 'Creation' at
the Norwich Festival, and was asked how she
liked it. She answered that it was the first time
she had ever accompanied an orchestra. What
would she have said to some modern operas ?
A vocal vice next sprang into existence ;
namely, a departure from the steadily sustained
note. It took two forms, the Vibrato and the
Tremolo. The first had been introduced by
Rubini, and its abuse was the one thing in his
singing which could have been spared. Both
are legitimate means of expression in dramatic
music, when used sparingly in the proper time
and place ; but when constantly heard are in
tolerable. They (the Tremolo especially) cause at
first a painful sensation by suggesting a state of
nervous excitement that must infallibly be ra
pidly fatal ; but this soon subsides, and they are
felt to be mere abominable mannerisms, express
ing nothing at all but a direful want of control
over the feelings. And there is no greater nuisance
in life than cheap tears. Ferri, a baritone who
sang at the Scala about 1853, made use of the
tremolo upon every note, to such an extent that
his whole singing was a bad wobbling trill.
Almost all the singers of that time indulged in
it. It is said to be the result of overstraining
the voice in singing against the heavy instru
mentation. But this is clearly not the case, since
many who use it are as fresh at the end of an
opera as at the beginning. It is probably some
times used with the view of making the voice
carry ; but if it does this, it does it at the expense
of intonation. With others it is simply an ex
aggeration, supposed to be ' intense.' It is hap
pily beginning to disappear, thanks to the few
who have resisted the fascination of easy popu
larity, and preserved the traditions of the good
school, amongst whom our own best concert and
oratorio singers have done their full share of
good work. Apropos to this substitute for
[ true expression, what are we to understand by
510
SINGING.
that much-abused word ? A generally accepted
meaning is a series of aimless ill-proportioned
crescendos and diminuendos, rallentandos and
accellerandos with a constant apparent disposi
tion to cry. Taste and expression are often con
founded with each other. ' Expression,' if only
from its etymology, means a manifestation of the
thought and feeling that is passing within. Can
people, then, be taught to sing with true expres
sion ? Certainly not through the bare outward
means to the end. But they may be taught
to seek for some meaning in their words and
music that shall rouse their feelings, and then
they may be guided in their use of the me
chanical means at their disposal, in order to
avoid exaggeration : when once they feel, we have
the signs of it in the mere sound of the voice ;
and it is this subtle expression springing from
within that finds its way from one soul to another;
and as a glass reflects only what is placed before
it, so, only so far as the singing is or has been
felt by the singer, will it be felt by the hearer.
Before the death of Titiens we were so fortu
nate as to have here five prime donne at one
time — Titiens herself, Adelina Patti, Nilsson,
Albani, and Trebelli — four of whom we may
hope to have for some time to come. Titiens
was a fine example of the soprano drammatico.
The voice was of unusual magnitude, and grand
quality, with just an idea of veil upon it.
The veil, in a small degree, is by no means of
necessity a defect. Indeed it adds substance to
the voice where it is otherwise pure and strong.
One of the most remarkable instances of the
voce velata was Dorus-Gras, who sang in Eng
land in 1839 and 40. The veil had possibly come
over the voice after first youth, but it was then
very marked. With a fine voice sounding through
it, a most brilliant style, and excellent execution,
it quite gave the idea of the bright sun and blue
sky shining through and dispelling a white morn
ing mist.
To return to Titiens. Such parts as Medea,
Norma, Semiramide, Fidelio, were her forte.
Besides her occasional heavy breathing, she had
a defect in the pronunciation of the vowel e
(Italian), which so far marred her voice-pro
duction ; but she was a conscientious artist, and
a fine singer both in oratorio and opera.
Adelina Patti, blest with a clear, pure, facile,
high soprano voice, which apparently never gave
her any trouble, of considerable compass, produced
in a faultless manner, is one of the greatest
mistresses of vocalisation of our times. Nilsson,
with a fine, extensive voice, and much dramatic
talent, has a peculiar earnestness, in parts that
she feels to belong to her, that is most attractive.
During her early great successes inParis,one of her
greatest was the part of Elvira in ' Don Giovanni,'
a part almost unappreciated in London. Her
prison scene in Bo'ito's ' Mefistofele ' is a very
perfect performance. The beauty of Albstni's
voice, the grace of her style, and her thorough
conscientiousness, have justly made her a great
favourite. Trebelli, with her grand mezzo-soprano
voice and style, is another of the great artists of
SINGING.
the present day, and Pauline Lucca yet another.
With six such singers at one time, it might
be asked, ' Where is the decadence in the art
of singing of which you complain ? ' We must
remember that in England we get the very best of
everything (except climate), and that it is to these
very artists, and those in the same path, that we
owe the preservation of the good school.
Lady singers have been and are, for the most
part, well-favoured ; many very beautiful ; those
of the stronger sex are also generally well-look
ing. But there have been instances of the re
verse, and of the triumph of art over this draw
back. Tacchinardi (Persiani's father), was so
plain as to raise a coarse laugh when he first
appeared in Italy, upon which he came to the
footlights and said, ' I am here to be listened to,
not to be looked at.' He was listened to, and
admired. Pisaroni, the great contralto, was so
ill-favoured that she usually sent her portrait to
the managers of theatres before making an en
gagement. She was nevertheless very famous.
In about the year 1855 Barbieri-Nini, a well-
known soprano in many parts, was the prima
donna assoluta at the Scala. r The opening opera
was Verdi's ' Vespri Sicilian!,' under the title of
' Giovanna di Guzman.' The heroine was a young
girl. Barbieri-Nini, who impersonated her, was
very short and thickset, without the semblance
of a waist, very ugly, marked with small-pox, and
with the looks of about fifty-five. When she ap
peared, there was the general coarse 'Oh, oh!' and
laugh of the Milanese public. As she proceeded,
however, attention became fixed upon the singing;
a certain duet with the tenor made her an esta
blished favourite, and she remained so to the end
of the Carnival. The Milanese, though unsparing
in their censure, are immediately ready to recog
nize what is good ; they will hiss a singer through
nearly a whole evening, and yet a little bit, of a
few notes only, well executed, will provoke a
storm, of applause.
About the time when the tremolo was be
coming intolerable (1854% Clara Novello was the
prima donna assoluta, and the great beauty of
her voice and her freedom from the prevailing
vice, caused her to be greatly admired. Singers
do not always know their own powers. Clara
Novello was requested to sing the part of Gilda
in ' Eigoletto.' This she at first declined to
do, on the plea that it was totally unfitted for
her. Being persuaded, however, it proved an
enormous success. She sang the music beauti
fully, and acted the part with much grace. The
baritone was Corsi, one of the best Rigolettos ;
and the performance was a very fine one. Corsi
was a little man, rather stout, and with not very
dramatic features, being somewhat like the busts
of Socrates, but his dignified gestures had the
power of apparently increasing his stature. His
sympathetic, but not over strong voice, would
not bear the strain of large theatres; it left him,
and he became a teacher of singing.
There has been a long list of tenors, beginning
curiously with a Nicolmo and a Mario in the
1 7th century, leading down to our own Mario
SINGING.
and Nicolini, and comprising the names of Boro-
sini, Bianchi, Davide, Ansani, Donzelli (with a
voice that sent out large globes of sound), Tacchi-
nardi, Tramezzani, Garcia, Malibran's father, who
had a voice capable of singing either tenor or
baritone, and for whom it has been said that
Kossini wrote ' Otello" — (it was certainly written
for an exceptional voice, since part of the open
ing aria extends from the bass A to the high
tenor A) — Rubini, Haitzinger, Duprez, Ivanoff,
(whose reputation was made by singing an Italian
version of Schubert's serenade at concerts),
Moriani, Guasco, Fraschini, Roger, Gardoni,
Tamberlik, Wachtel, Mongini, Giuglini, Cam-
panini, Gayarre, etc. The greater number of the
earlier tenors seem to have been highly finished
singers, Ansani especially so. Many of us re
member Rubini, with his power of drawing tears
by the simple force of pathetic expression. Mo
riani — a great favourite with Mendelssohn — was
to have been Rubini's successor in the world's
estimation, but neither he nor Guasco — another
beautiful voice and talent — fulfilled their early
promise. Of all the tenors that we have heard
on the stage, Mario was perhaps the most
favoured by nature, and even if his natural
talent was not exerted to the full, he has left
a gap not easily to be filled. A voice rich as
Devonshire cream, and a fine manly delivery,
with an unusual freedom from the tremolo, were
qualifications indeed. Duprez, Tamberlik, and
Wachtel were tenori di forza with great quali
ties, but not without defects. Mongini, whose
&6but at La Scala in 'Guillaume Tell' was a
triumphant success, but whose appearance a few
nights after in 'La Sonnambula' was an entire
failure, was another of the tenori robusti, and
rather a vocal athlete than a refined singer.
Giuglini was a very graceful and charming
artist, to be listened to for a time, but he
lacked vigour, and the extreme sweetness of
the voice and a somewhat throaty production
soon made one wish for something more. Cam-
panini, with a good voice, and total freedom
from tremolo, was at first enthusiastically wel
comed on the latter account, but his production
was very throaty. He improved in this respect,
and was earnest in what he did. Nicolini and
Gayarre are both powerful singers, but both
troubled with the tremolo. One of the best
tenors of modern times was Gardoni. With not
a large voice, his production and style were per
fect. On the stage his singing was as distinctly
heard as in a room, and in a room it was most
graceful and sympathetic. This is one of the
charms of the good school. Grisi and the rest
of her well-known party had perfect control over
their voices in private. — Basses and baritones
have also been numerous, from the time of
Boschi and Fischer, already mentioned. Ambro-
getti, though a buffo, was prodigiously fine in a
part that was anything but comic, the mad father
of Agnese in Paer's opera of that name. Galli,
whose voice was at first tenor, but after an illness
changed to bass, was a very fine singer. It was
said that his voice could be heard at the Caffe
SINGING.
511
Martini, which in those days stood opposite the
Scala opera-house. It had to traverse the row of
boxes, two corridors, the portico of the theatre,
and a moderately wide street. Perhaps with a
box door, the entrance to the theatre, and the
door of the Caffe, all open by chance at the same
moment, a note may have been heard. At any
rate it must have been a great voice. Tamburini,
with a most defective vocalisation — singing a
florid passage with great agility, but detaching all
the notes, and going through all the vowels in the
process — was nevertheless a very great artist.
His qualifications were a fine voice, a fine manly
style when not singing florid music, a noble stage
presence, refined manner and action, and a hand
some person. His facility in executing passages
in his own manner, naturally made him take florid
parts, and he was otherwise so good that his
obvious defects were pardoned. He was the
best Don Giovanni, and the best Fernando in
' La Gazza ladra ' that has been seen. He was
as good a Duca in ' Lucrezia Borgia/ and Henry
VIII. in 'Anna Bolena,' as Lablacbe, but in his
own way. His Dandini in ' La Cenerentola '
was quite as good. He was therefore a great
talent. Amongst basses Lablache was perhaps
the most thoroughly satisfactory artist, even of
those great days. Magnificent voice, perfect pro
duction, a noble countenance and person, in spite
of his size, and a total freedom from trick or af
fectation. This was the chief secret of his powers
as an actor — his faculty of identifying himself with
his part. Fornasari was a clever singer and actor,
but, even at that date, he was afflicted to some
extent with the tremolo mania, which interfered
with his execution. Coletti was excellent, but
not to be accepted in the place of Tamburini,
whose exorbitant demands had provoked the
famous ' Tamburini row.' Giorgio Ronconi
was a striking instance of deficiency in physical
means, in quality and power of voice, and
in personal appearance, more than counter
balanced by tragic force of the highest order.
His powers were equally great in comedy. His
Figaro in the 'Barbiere' was the best on the
operatic stage. Ronconi was very witty, and
a very good anecdote is told of him, which may
be considered authentic. Under the Austrian
government the police authorities were very
strict about the words of the libretti. When
singing the ' Puritani ' at the Scala the phrase
' gridando iiberta ' made such a sensation that
Ronconi was sent for and told to substitute
' lealta ' for * liberta.' He quietly obeyed, and a
few nights after, when Dulcamara in the
' Elisire d'Amore ' has to say, speaking of Nemo-
rino, ' vende la liberta, si f e soldato ' (' he sold
his liberty and became a soldier '), Ronconi: again
substituted 'lealta' for 'liberta,' making the
passage run, ' be sold his loyalty and became
a soldier.' This was of course a furious hit at
an alien government. Belletti, with a voice
not large but well-produced and telling, was a
highly-finished singer, with great power of dis
tinct vocalisation. Formes, with an immense
voice, was a clever but somewhat erratic singer,
512
SINGING.
and wanted study. Graziani is too well known
to the reader to require more than mention.
So too are Cotogni, Faure, and Lassalle. Hen-
schel has been a great addition to our concert
singers. Several Americans have been and are
on the operatic stage with excellent effect. They
have many very fine voices amongst them, par
ticularly of the large mezzo-soprano type, of
which Miss Gary, who sang as Mile. Cari at
both opera-houses, was a good example. Miss
Kellogg and Foli are both well known. Minnie
Hauck, Mrs. Osgood, Madame Antoinette Ster
ling, and Madame Fassett are great public
favourites. The Americans have a good deal of
dramatic fire and power of execution, and it
seems strange therefore that (according to their
own statement) they have no efficient teachers.
The fitful and precarious condition of English
opera has militated against the cultivation of
dramatic singing by English vocalists. The
language, though not as favourable as it might
be, is capable of being made much more of than
it generally is, by a proper choice of words, and
a pure and articulate enunciation. Many of our
singers have had very good, in many cases great,
success on the Italian stage — Clara Novello,
Catherine Hayes, Sims Reeves, Santley. But,
for lack of a permanent Opera, we have studied
chiefly for the concert-room and oratorio. Going
back 80 or 90 years we find the names of Mrs.
Crouch, an excellent singer and actress ; Mrs.
Bates, wife of the founder of the Antient Con
certs ; and Miss Jackson (Mrs. Bianchi Lacy),
clever concert and oratorio singers ; Miss
Stephens ; Miss Paton, a very fine opera and
concert singer ; Mrs. Knyvett ; Miss Birch,
for many years our most favourite concert singer,
with a beautiful voice ; Mrs. Alfred Shaw and
Miss Fanny Wyndham, both fine contraltos.
These three sang a little in opera. Miss
Homer was a really fine dramatic singer, and
a good actress, certainly one of our best. Her
three greatest successes were Barnett's ' Moun
tain Sylph,' the ' Sonnambula,' and the ' Fa-
vorita,' which was sung in English at Drury
Lane, in 1843, by her, Templeton, and Leffler.
Parepa was a very clever singer and actress,
dying in her prime ; and Miss Louisa Pyne is
fresh in the recollection of many. Miss Rose
Hersee has done excellent service in opera. Ade
laide Kemble (Mrs. Sartoris) studied chiefly for
the stage. The tenors during the time here spoken
of were Michael Kelly, Sinclair, Incledon, and
one whose name will always shine in musical
history, Braham, the possessor of a marvellous
voice and great powers as a singer, whether
of Italian and English opera or of oratorio.
At 70 he still sang in private, giving out
notes from his big chest with immense power.
Wilson and Templeton were English opera
singers. Both had good voices, but the latter
was very throaty. Harrison was a clever singer
and actor, and did much to advance the inter
ests of English opera. Our basses and baritones
have been Bartleman, a very fine singer, great
in Purcell and Handel ; Bellamy ; Henry Phil-
SINGING.
lips, very clever and versatile, and a good actor.
Weiss, with a very fine voice, was awkward on the
stage, but good in oratorio; Lewis Thomas,
a true bass, has done excellent service. Many
have appeared with considerable promise, but
have not done all that was expected. We have
been fortunate in the possession of an English
quartet, which has upheld, or rather created, a
modern English school of singing, in which many
objectionable peculiarities have been done away
with, to a great extent through the study of
Italian music and pronunciation — Madame Lem-
mens-Sherrington, Madame Sainton-Dolby, Sims
Reeves, and Santley. The varied talent of these
true artists is not more remarkable than their
earnestness in furthering the interests of their
art. Madame Sainton, a true contralto, certainly
founded a school of contralto singing. Her powers
extended from the simplest ballad to works of the
largest classical style — English, French, German,
or Italian. Reeves received the traditions of
Braham, and refined upon them ; and Santley has
done more than any other one baritone or bass.
His range of style is unlimited.
We owe a large debt of gratitude to the singers
of widely various nationalities, some few of whom
have been enumerated, as well as to our own faith
ful English band, who have piloted the vocal art
through the shoals of conventionality and the
aberrations of popular taste. There have been
two great waves of progress and retrogression ;
the first, from the creation of opera up to the
culmination of the mechanical branch of the
Farinelli school ; and the second, from the con
ventionality of that school up to the union of
dramatic force with perfect singing in that in
augurated by Pasta. From the reaction that set
in afterwards there are signs that we are begin
ning to mount a third wave. There is recently
a marked general improvement in the singing of
many of those who have visited this country,
while among our own singers several have
already made high reputations, and others are
giving great promise. Madame Patey has been
long the acknowledged successor of Madame
Sainton, to whom she bears much resemblance
both in voice and in breadth of style. Mrs.
Keppell (Madame Enriquez) is also an excellent
contralto, while Miss Damian and Miss Orridge
are making good way, and others promising well.
Among our soprani Miss Robertson and Madame
Edith Wynne have long held a high position.
Miss Anna Williams, Miss Mary Davies, and
Miss Elliot are very talented singers ; Miss
Marriott, and Miss Samuell, are steadily ad
vancing. Mrs. Hutchinson, with a sweet voice
and much taste, is beginning to make her mark.
Edward Lloyd, an artist of the first order, won his
artistic spurs at the Gloucester Festival in 1871.
Vernon Rigby and W. H. Cummings (a musician
and archasologist of distinction) also stand high
in the public estimation. Shakespeare, be
sides being an excellent singer, is a valued
instructor, and a thorough musician. Maas and
McGuckin have already had much success ; Her
bert Reeves, with a small voice but good style,
SINGING.
and several others, among them Harper Kearton
and Frank Boyle, are coming on well ; so that
there is really no lack of tenors if they all
fulfil their mission. Of baritones and basses we
may name King, Thorndike, Barrington Foote,
Pyat, Thurley Beale, and others. We have more
singers now than we ever had.
The question of a National Opera has again
come to the front, and there could hardly be a
better moment in which to consider it than the
present, in connection with the Royal College
of Music. The founding of a National Opera
House — that is to say, a theatre liberally sub
sidised by government or endowed by private
subscription — for the exclusive performance of
English opera and opera in English, is a neces
sity. If made part of the College, under the
control of the directors, it could be conducted
upon the strictest rules of order, propriety,
and morality ; but it should be to all intents
and purposes a public theatre. Though not
necessarily as large as either of the existing
opera-houses, it should be of sufficient size to
have a full orchestra. English opera has been
often condemned to a theatre in which the or
chestra has been mutilated, or there has been
the full complement of wind with a totally in
adequate supply of strings. Either of these shifts
must be avoided, and to avoid them the theatre
would have to be of reasonable dimensions.
A good model is not far to seek. Both the
existing theatres are acoustically good. The
new one should not be a mere practising ground
for the students of the College, except to give
them experience in subordinate parts. They should
only be admitted when thoroughly proficient
singers. Until then, artists would have to be pro
cured from outside ; but after that the College
itself would furnish them. So with the orchestra ;
it would be necessary at first to engage artists
to ensure thorough efficiency, but it should ulti
mately be formed, as far as possible, of students
competent to take their place in it. Thus by
degrees the whole artistic staff might be formed
of the pupils of the College. In this way an
esprit de corps would be created which would
tend to advance the artistic excellence of the
whole establishment, while the fact of its being
distinctly a public theatre would make students
feel that there was no child's play. If a com
poser were commissioned to write an opera for
this theatre, the libretto should be first submitted
to the directors, in order that good original
words and good translations might be as far
as possible secured. Any profit realised from
the theatre might go to found scholarships or a
superannuation fund. If some permanent esta
blishment of the kind were founded, then both
singers and composers would find it worth their
while to work for it. Mr. Carl Rosa has shown
to a great extent what may be done.
Reference has been made to the natural apti
tude for choral singing in the Northern and
Midland counties of England. This branch
received a vast impulse in, England generally
through the efforts of Dr. Hufiahj and both
VOL. in. PT. 3.
SINGING.
513
Mr. Henry Leslie and Mr. Barnby have contri
buted largely to its advancement. Many re
fined renderings of difficult music have given
proof of the high grade of excellence to which
Mr. Otto Goldschmidt has brought the Bach
Society. But all this choral activity has not
been an unmixed benefit. The indiscriminate
manner in which amateurs join the various
public and private choral societies leads to the
yearly deterioration and even destruction of
many young voices. Undeveloped voices that
can barely sing for ten minutes without fatigue,
draft themselves into a chorus, and indulge in
frequent practices of from an hour and a half
to two hours of high music, with the idea that
though they cannot make much effect alone,
they are good enough for a chorus, forgetting or
ignoring that the very want of practice and
development that renders them inefficient solo-
singers makes the chorus doubly dangerous to
them. They say ' We are helped forwards by
the practised voices.' But a feeble runner bound
to a powerful one will be helped forward for a
very short time only ; he will then be forced
onward, and finally, when exhausted, will be
dragged along the ground and trampled under
foot. But it is not only on account of the music
being so often beyond the compass of ordinary
voices that mischief is done. It is well known
that a voice in unison with several others becomes
almost entirely neutralised, as far as the possessor's
consciousness is concerned. The singer's voice
goes to swell the volume of sound, but cannot be
heard by its owner, and the result is an amount
of perhaps unintentional forcing that leaves her
vocally exhausted at the end of a chorus. Be
sides, notes are taken by hook or by crook, and
voice-production is forgotten. The conductor of
a chorus has nothing whatever to do with indi
vidual voices. He must get the maximum of
effect out of his little army of singers. Pro
fessional chorus-singers learn to make only the
necessary effort, and a singer without the required
vocal means sufficiently developed would not be
admitted into a professional chorus. Again, those
whose existence depends upon their voice will not
allow enthusiasm to carry them beyond their
powers, as those do who join a chorus for the
love of the thing. The evil is so great as to
require serious consideration, and the whole
question of choral singing should be systematised.
Elementary classes should be formed. Intro
ductory elementary classes should exist in which
two voices only should practice in unison, each
voice singing first alone, passage by passage :
thus the production and right amount of tone
would be cared for. Numbers of voices might be
benefitted, if not saved from destruction, by lead
ing to sing in chorus. This is a subject that might
well attract the attention of the Royal College
of Music. As it is, the mischief will become
more and more apparent, members of choral
societies will fall away rather than lose their
voices, and it may be found difficult to keep
a sufficient body together. But with proper care
a most instructive and enjoyable branch of
L 1
514
SINGING.
musical art could be indulged in 'with benefit
as well as pleasure, and the choral bodies would
be in fitter condition to observe the nuances
required by a critical conductor.
The style of operatic writing immediately be
fore us at this moment cannot continue, with
any hope of the advancement of singing, but
the influence of the great living master's mind
•will not be the less felt for good, when tempered
with the calmer judgment of less fiery and less
defiant, though not less zealous and conscientious
geniuses, who will no doubt succeed him and
modify his theories.
It must be repeated that the features of dif
ferent schools of singing are greatly traceable
to the influence of language. How is a school
to be defined? Is it not the spirit of a code
of art-canons which has grown up, or, so to say,
compiled itself from the salient characteristics
of the most prominent votaries of an art ?
In proportion as these characteristics are un
sullied by peculiarities or tricks the school will
be pure. The influence of a talent will unfor
tunately impose its defects and abberations by
the very force of its higher qualities, and the
defects are more easily imitated than the higher
qualities. Hence the necessity, on the part of
each individual votary of an art, for the most
rigorous self-discipline. A great difficulty in
the way of study is to hear oneself as one really
is, and not as one intends to be. We are so
much under the dominion of our minds that it is
often very hard to avoid accepting our intentions
for performance. Those who are blest with
voice and talent must realise the fact that they
are high priests and priestesses of their art ;
that to them is assigned the mission of helping
to form a school, and that their example, for
good or ill, does more than a hundred books.
And it is precisely to those who have exer
cised this earnest self-discipline that we owe
the preservation of the valuable traditions of
a good school. Even in language — which has
just been said to influence a school of sing
ing — it is the province of the singer to purify
its sounds to the utmost. We cannot help
tracing, for example, the chief defect of French
singing, the so-called gorge d&ploye style, to
the normal flat French a, which led to ex
aggeration, more apparent perhaps than real.
The tremolo (observable even in that great
artist Mons. Faure), which had its development
in France, has of course no origin in language,
but is possibly due to the vibrato of Rubini. It is
one of the tricks glanced at above which has been
allowed to creep in, and has proved itself a truly
noxious vocal weed. How much these defects
have been tempered of late amongst French artists
is felt in the fine singing of Mons. Lasalle. The
Germans do not pay sufficient attention to special
characters of voice, and are given to forcing them
beyond their natural limits. There is also a
great waste of power, a great wear and tear
of the general physical strength, consequent
upon their singing being too convulsive, result
ing often in a laboured suppression of voice.
SINGING.
They have a mode of producing the vowel e, and
their double sound ei, which greatly damages
the quality of the voice on those sounds, so
that a German frequently seems to possess a
voice that is at once good and bad. But these
are not really characteristics of the language,
and should be abandoned by singers. Vilda,
the German soprano, who appeared some years
ago at Covent Garden, had a perfect produc
tion and style, and Stockhausen, who was here
about ten years ago, a singer of great talent,
had none of the defects above mentioned, and
was a master of declamation. So is Zur Miihlen,
a young Esthonian singer, who deserves to be
better known. It is remarkable that, with their
power as composers and musicians, and their
general high intelligence, the Germans are not
better singers. They make a grievous mistake
if they think the vocal art beneath their notice.
The two singers lately heard in 'Der Ring
des Niebelungen,5 Heir and Madame Vogel,
with their magnificent voices, their earnestness,
and their power as actors, could not help every
now and then marring their otherwise admirable
performance by the defects belonging to their
school. Herr Gura, in 'Die Meistersinger,'
showed powers of purer vocalisation.
The English characteristic has been till lately
rather a lack of any characteristic whatever, ex
cept defective pronunciation ; and a general apathy
and want of interest which has caused many
good voices to be wasted. We are fast waking
up from this state of things. The defects above
enumerated have been those mostly observable
amongst the general amateur class and artists of
a mediocre stamp — peculiarities of the respec
tive countries in fact. And in proportion as
individuals have steered clear of these defects
and have carried self-discipline rigidly into effect,
so far have they taken an artistic position. In
this country (as in others) there are some first-
rate amateurs, many of whom are doing ex
cellent service in endeavouring to foster a love
of music in all classes, by founding societies for
giving concerts, either free or at nominal prices
of admission. Some of our amateurs would do
credit to the profession of music anywhere in
Europe. We owe to them some of our best Eng
lish songs. True, some of these are over-elaborate,
but this is a welcome counterpoise to the too
great simplicity and uniformity of many of our
native songs. Not that simplicity, per se, is a
fault. On the contrary, if we look amongst the
immense numbers of songs by the greatest song
writers of the age, the Germans, and especially
amongst the greatest of these, Franz Schubert,
we frequently find a marvellous amount of music,
or, at least, significance, with but little material.
The great quality in the best German songs is
their independence and unconventionally. Each
song is a poem — some, long poems — in which the
composer seems not to have cared whether others
existed or not, but to have drawn his inspira
tion immediately from what was before his mind.
Thus there is scarcely a single stereotyped form
amongst them. Schubert, Mendelssohn, Schu-
SINGING.
mann, Brahms (many of whose songs are of
great power), Rubinstein, Jensen, Franz, Grieg,
Kjerulf, have given us a collection of precious
jewels. The lighter writers, Kiicken, Eckert,
etc., have also produced a number of charming
Lieder. French songs are many of them very
graceful, original, and attractive. Those of
Gounod are often charming; and in his songs
Berlioz is for once natural, simple, and exqui
sitely beautiful. The chamber-songs of the Ita
lians are, like our own, too uniform, but they
are always thoroughly singable, and those of
Gordigiani, Mariani, De Giosa, etc., are original
to boot. It is to the old writers that we look for
the best Italian chamber-songs. Amongst our
modern English song-writers, Sterndale Bennett,
Hullah, Salaman, Macfarren, Sullivan, Cowen,
Seym our Egerton, Hubert Parry, F. Clay, Michael
Lawson, Villiers Stanford, Maude White, etc.,
and of foreign composers — Benedict, Agnes Zim-
mermann (both almost English), Gounod, Blu-
menthal, Henschel, Pinsuti, have supplied us
•with works that ought to keep the public taste
at a proper level. But there has been an in
sidious influence at work which has had more
to do with vitiated taste and bad voice-produc
tion amongst amateurs than is perhaps generally
supposed — the Music Hall. Young men lounge
into music halls, and hear imbecile songs sung
in a tone of voice that is simply sickening. They
sing these songs at home in the same tone ;
the songs themselves, with illustrated title-
pages, are found, perhaps, lying between two
sonatas of Beethoven, or two songs of Mozart ;
and have infinitely more effect, in many cases,
upon the tone of voice in singing or even speak
ing than any precepts of an instructor. It is
with reference to such influences that the nature
of abstract music was dwelt upon at the begin
ning of this article — that is to say, its power
of expression, apart from mere tune ; and if this
and the influence of pure pronunciation were
more felt than they are, our general style of sing
ing would be very much above what it is.
It is greatly to be regretted that there is not a
career of pure chamber-singing in this country.
That is to say, that those (and there are many
such) with sympathetic voices and refined style,
but without sufficient power for large spaces,
should have so few chances of making a position
for themselves. They are forced to pass through
the ordeal of trying their powers in vast public
places where they are heard to disadvantage, and
are often unjustly condemned ; whereas if judged
upon their merits in their legitimate sphere,
they would be fully appreciated. Perhaps this
will come with a general elevation of public
taste.
It is much to be desired that students of
singing should at the same time become good
musicians. The publisher of the ' Solfe"ges du
Conservatoire, par Cherubim,' etc., in his preface,
properly lays great stress on this point, and on
the necessity, to this end, of the study of roca-
lizzi by the best composers, so that the taste
.may be formed with the formation of the voice.
SINGAKADEMIE.
515
A strong proof of the low ebb at which the
art of singing now lies in this country is the
very small musical knowledge that the bulk of
singers find sufficient for their purpose. It is
customary to cite the names of one or two
specially gifted individuals who made great
names without musical knowledge. These are
but the exceptions that prove the rule. The
fact would be more obvious were it not the
custom in this country to 'hammer away' at the
same pieces until they are worn out. The great
singers of former times who originated and per
fected the good school were, the greater part of
them, good musicians ; indeed the older teachers
— Caccini, Pistocchi, Scarlatti, Porpora, etc. —
themselves great contrapuntists, would not have
it otherwise. The music of Sebastian Bach and
his school absolutely requires the singer to be a
musician in order to do it justice. To sing a few
ballads does not. Later masters — Crescentini,
Garcia, Mazzucato, Randegger, etc. — have been
good musicians, and it is a matter of the first and
last importance that a proper study of the theory
of music should be considered an indispensable
branch of the singer's education — that is to say,
if the art is to rise to the level at which it
should be. [H.C.D.]
SINGAKADEMIE, THE BERLIN, one of the
most important art-institutions in Germany. Its
founder was Carl Friedrich Christian Fasch, born
1 736 and appointed in 1756 cembalist to Frederic
the Great of Prussia, after whose death he led a
quiet and retired life in Berlin as music teacher
and composer. The Singakademie originated
with some attempts made by Fasch and a few of
his pupils and musical friends to perform his
own sacred compositions for mixed voices. The
actual Akademie was founded on Thursday,
May 24, 1791, and up to the present time the
weekly practices are still held on a Thursday.
The original members were 27, thus distributed:
— 7 soprani, 5 alti, 7 tenors, and 8 basses. The
society was at first entirely private, the meetings
taking place at the house of Frau Voitus (Unter
den Linden, no. 59, afterwards Charlottenstrasse
no. 61). This character it retained even after the
practices were held in a room at the Royal
Academy of Arts, the use of which was granted
to the Singakademie Nov. 5, 1793. The first of
the regular public performances took place at
Easter 1801. The proceeds were at first devoted
to charitable objects, but after the Akademie
had, in 1827, erected its own buildings, where
the meetings are still held, and which con
tains the best concert-room in Berlin, it became
necessary to have performances for the benefit of
the Institution, and these are still carried on.
The object of the founder was to promote the
practice of sacred music both accompanied and
unaccompanied, but especially the latter. The
society at first confined itself to Fasch's composi
tions, singing amongst others his i6-part Mass a
cappella, but in a short time pieces by Durante,
Graun, Leo, Lotti, etc., were added. The first
oratorio of Handel's put in rehearsal was Judas
Maccabeus (1795). The original purpose of the
L12
516
SINGAKADEMIE,
institution has -been faithfully adhered to. Its
exertions for the spread of Handel's oratorios
throughout Germany have been most successful,
and indeed the promotion of this special branch
of art is the most essential feature of the Sing-
akademie. Less favourable results have been at
tained with regard to Bach, whose church com
positions have been treated as concert pieces,
which in many cases puts them in an entirely
wrong aspect. The first performance of Bach's
Matthew-Passion in 1829 is well known, and
indeed marks an epoch, but the chief credit is
due, not to the Singakademie, but to the con
ductor -of the performance, Felix Mendelssohn
Bartholdy.
The Berlin Singakademie has served as a
model for most of the vocal unions of Germany.
Its structure is exceedingly simple, the governing
body consisting of a director, who has charge of
all musical matters, and a committee of members
(ladies as well as gentlemen) who manage the
business. All of these are elected at general
meetings. Since 1815 the director has had a
fixed salary out of the funds of the society. New
members are admitted by the director and the
committee. There is a special practice on Wed
nesdays for less advanced members, who must
attain a certain amount of proficiency at this,
before being allowed to join the main body. The
numbers rose in 1788 to 114, in 1813 to 301, in
1827 .to 436, and in 1841 to 6 1 8. At the present
moment there are 600 members.
Fasch died in 1800, and was succeeded in the
directorship by his pupil Carl Friedrich Zelter.
An attempt to bring in Mendelssohn having
failed, Zelter .was succeeded by Carl Friedrich
Rungenhagen (1832 to 1851) and he by Eduard
August Grell, who relinquished the directorship
in 1876 on account of his advanced age, but re
tains a seat and vote in the committee, with the
title of honorary director. Martin Blumner, the
present conductor, was born in 1827, an<^ aP~
pointed in 1876. [P.S.]
SINGSPIEL. This term has been in use in
Germany for the last 300 years to denote a dra
matic representation with music ; not any one
particular kind — singing being capable of being
employed in such various ways — but any enter
tainment in which spoken dialogue and singing
alternate. In time speech gave way at intervals
not only to singing, but to singing by several
voices at once. Later, when the spoken dialogue
had been brought into entire subjection to music,
as was the case in Italy after the revolution effected
in the whole nature of dramatic representation by
the rise of opera, not only concerted vocal pieces
were introduced into the German Singspiel, but
instrumental music and its prote'ge' monody as
well. We find the earliest traces of the Singspiel
in the German miracle-plays, which were gra
dually developed outside the churches from the
Passions given inside them. The Passions-were
sung throughout, while in the miracle -plays
spoken words in German were introduced, the
singing still being in Latin, as for example in the
'Ludus paschalis de passione Domini/ MS. of
SINGSPIEL.
the 1 3th century. In course of time the Latin
text, and consequently the music, was thrust
into the background. In a 14th-century MS.
called ' Marienklage,' preserved in the convent
of Lichtenthal near Baden, Mary sings in Ger
man. Indeed we already find the typical Ger
man miracle-play in the ' Spiel von den zehn
Jungfrauen' performed at Eisenach in 1322, in
which all the words sung are German. These
plays were generally performed on the eves of
the great festivals, such as Whit Sunday, Epi
phany, etc. Gradually the ecclesiastical element
disappeared, leaving only the secular, and thus
originated the Shrove Tuesday plays, in which
the characteristics of whole classes of society,
priests, doctors, travelling scholars, etc., were held
up to ridicule. Nuremberg and Augsburg were
specially celebrated for these plays, written for the
most part by Hans Rosenblut (about 1405), Hans
Folz of Worms (about 1480), both living in
Nuremberg, and Nicolaus Mercator. They gra
dually however degenerated into obscene pieces,
until in the i6th century Hans Sachs and Jakob
Ayrer (both of whom introduced music into their
plays) started the movement which ended in the
reformation of the German stage. By Ayrer
we still have a ' Schb'ns neus singets Spiel,' ' Der
Munch im Kesskorb,' sung in 1618 by five per
sons 'entirely on the melody of the English
Roland.' This melody is repeated 54 times, and
one cannot help suspecting that the English
stage was to some extent Ayrer' s model. A
reaction from these 'people's plays' (as they
might be called) was caused by the ' school
plays' in Latin, annually performed by the
pupils of the Jesuits. Between the acts Ger
man interludes with music were introduced,
and these were virtually Singspiele in the
modern sense. The first Singspiel in imitation
of the Italian opera without any spoken dialogue
was ' Dafne,' written by Martin Opitz and com
posed by Heinrich Schutz in 1627 ; unfortun
ately this has been lost. The earliest instance
of an independent German Singspiel with singing
and spoken dialogue was ' Seelewig,' a sacred
Waldgedicht or Freudenspiel. In a spoken play
of Harsdorffer's (1644) were introduced Arias
after the Italian manner, composed (see Eitner's
'Monatsheft fur Musikgeschichte,' 1881, noa.
4, 5, 6), by Siegmund Gottlieb Staden (born
in 1607 at Nuremberg, succeeded his father
as organist of St. Sebald in 1634, and died in
1655). The piece is intended for private perform
ance, and written for 3 trebles, 2 altos, 2 tenors,
I bass, 3 violins, 3 flutes, 3 reeds, and one large
horn, the bass being taken throughout by a
theorbo. No two voices ever sing at the same
time, and the instruments have short sympho
nies to themselves. The only regular stage at
that time was the Italian opera-house of each
capital (that of Vienna being built in 1651, and
that of Dresden in 1667) and of Nuremberg and
other Imperial cities. The German Singspiel
found a home in Hamburg in the theatre built
in 1678, but soon encountered a formidable rival
in German opera, founded by Reinhard Keiser.
SINGSPIEL.
After this, half a century went by before the
Singspiel is heard of again. In 1 743 the Dob-
belin company in Berlin produced without suc
cess a German Liederspiel, 'Der Teufel ist los,'
founded on the English piece 'The Devil to pay,'
followed by Schiirer's ' Doris' (i 747) and Scheibe's
' Thusnelda ' ( 1 749), both very successful. Thus
encouraged, Koch's company began to play Sing-
spiele in Leipzig, Weimar, and Berlin, their first
piece being ' Die verwandelten Weiber,' another
version of the ' Devil to pay,' written by C. F.
Weisse, composed by J. A. Hiller, and produced
at Leipzig in' 1 764 with great success. The same
authors produced a succession of similar pieces,
'Der lustige Schuster' (1765), ' Lottchen am
Hofe,' and 'Die Liebe auf deua Lande' (1767),
'Die Jagd' (1771), ' Aerndtekranz' and 'Der
Dorfbarbier' (1772). Neefe, Reichardt, Stege-
mann, Schweitzer, and others, brought to perfec
tion this new species, now called Operetta.
Independently of all this going on in North
Germany, the German Singspiel had sprung up
in Vienna, starting curiously enough with ' Die
doppelte Verwandlung' (1767), an adaptation
from the French ' Le Diable a quatre,' Sddaine's
version of ' The Devil to pay.' Werner, Haydn's
predecessor at Eisenstadt, had already produced
at the Court German Theatre a Tafelstiick (i. e.
piece intended for private performance) called
'Der Wienerische Tandelmarkt' (1760). The
marionette plays, of which Haydn was so fond,
were Singspiele, and he supplied the court of
Esterhaz, with 'Philemon und Baucis' (1773),
'Genoveva ' (1777), ' Dido/ a parody on a grand
opera (1778), and ' Die erfullte Rache ' (1780).
' Der krumme Teufel,' to words by Kurz, was
a real Singspiel. Dittersdorf's ' Doctor und
Apotheker,' ' Liebe im Narrenhause,' ' Hierony-
mus Knicker,' ' Rothe Kappchen,' etc., produced
at the Imperial Nationaltheater, were brilliant
successes. Kauer (1751-1831) composed no fewer
than 200 Singspiele, and Schenk was almost
equally prolific. The classic Singspiel was founded
by Mozart with his 'Entfuhrung' (July 12,1782),
which according to Goethe threw everything else
of the kind into the shade ; though whether one
is justified in calling it a Singspiel at all is a
moot point, the dramatic importance of the music
seeming to entitle it to rank as an opera. Even
the ' Zauberflote ' (1791) was styled a Singspiel
on the title-page of the PF. score. From this
point the Singspiel proper becomes continually
rarer, though Wenzel Miiller's ' Schwester von
Prag,' 'Das neue Sonntagskind,' and a few more
deserve mention. Lortzing's works are a mixture
of opera and Singspiel, certain numbers in the
' Czar und Zimmermann,' ' Waffenschmied, ' and
'Undine' being quite in the Lied-style, and the
music consequently of secondary importance,
while in others the music undoubtedly assists in
developing the characters, and raises these por
tions to the dignity of opera. We are here brought
face to face with the main distinction between
Opera and Singspiel ; the latter by no means
excludes occasional recitative in place of the
spoken dialogue, but the moment the music helps
SIREN.
517
to develope the dramatic denoument we have to
do with Opera, and not with Singspiel. It is
worth noting that no other nation possesses a
form identical with the German Singspiel ; the
French Vaudeville comes nearest to it, but for
this well-known tunes are adapted, instead of the
songs being specially composed for the piece as in
Germany. [F.G.]
SINK-A-PACE — also written CINQUE-PACE,
CINQUA-PACE, CINQUE PASS, CINQUE PAS, SIN-
QUA-PACE, SINQUE-PACE ahd SiNCOPAS — a name
by which the original Galliard was known. Prae-
torius (Syntagma Mus. vol. iii. chap. ii. p. 24)
says that a Galliard has five steps and is there
fore called a Cinque Pas. These five steps, or
rather combinations of steps, are well described
in Arbeau's ' Orche'sographie ' (Langres, 1588).
In later times the Galliard became so altered by
the addition of new steps, that the original form
of the dance seems to have been distinguished
by the name Cinq Pas. It is frequently men
tioned by the Elizabethan writers, well-known
examples being the allusions in Shakespeare's
' Much Ado about Nothing ' (Act ii. Sc. i),
Twelfth Night (Act i. Sc. 3), Marston's 'Sa-
tiromastix' (Act i), and Sir John Davies' 'Or
chestra ' (stanza 67). The following less-known
quotation is from the Histriomastix (Part I') of
Prynne (who was especially bitter against this
dance) : ' Alas there are but few who finde that
narrow way . . . and those few what are they ?
Not dancers, but mourners : not laughers, but
weepers ; whose tune is Lachrymae, whose musicke,
sighes for sinne ; who know no other Cinqua-pace
but this to Heaven, to goe mourning all the day
long for their iniquities ; to mourne in secret like
Doves, to chatter like Cranes for their owne and
others sinnes.' The following example of a Cinque-
pace is given by Wolfgang Caspar Printz, in his
' Phry nid Mitilenseus, oder Satyrischer Componist '
(Dresden, 1696), as a specimen of ' Trichonum
lambicum.' A longer example will be found in
Dauney's edition of the 15th-century Skene MS.
(Edinburgh, 1838).
f) - •
•- »- •
• . a /T3 ..
y
i° r
*r
J
/( (
i '
j
I t
J
* •
l '
, — — •—
tan*
±-±
:^_JL_£
* - *:
^=
5::
^^ny
?2-
[W.B.S.]
SIREN. This, though not strictly a musical
instrument, has rendered such good service to
acoustical science that it deserves brief notice :
for fuller details the works referred to below
must be consulted. ' It consists essentially,' says
the most recent writer on mathematical acoustics,1
' of a stiff disc, capable of revolving about its
centre, and pierced with one or more sets of
holes arranged at equal intervals round the cir
cumference of circles concentric with the disc. A
windpipe in connexion with bellows is presented
l Lord Eay leigh, Theory of Sound, vol. i. p. 5.
513
SIREN.
perpendicularly to the disc, its open end being
opposite to one of the circles, which contains a
set of holes. When the bellows are worked, the
stream of air escapes freely if a hole is opposite
to the end of the pipe ; but otherwise it is
obstructed. As the disc turns, puffs of air in
succession escape through it, until when the
velocity is sufficient, these blend into a note the
pitch of which rises continually with the rapid
sequence of the puffs. One of the most important
facts in the whole science of Acoustics is exem
plified by the siren — namely, that the pitch of a
note depends upon the period of its vibration.
The size and shape of the holes, the force of the
wind, and other elements of the problem may be
varied ; but if the number of puffs in a given
time, such as one second, remains unchanged, so
does the pitch. We may even dispense with
wind altogether, and produce a note by allowing
a card to tap against the edges of the holes as
they revolve ; the pitch will still be the same.'
The Siren may be defined as a wind instrument,
in which the successive air-waves are produced
not at random or by consonance, but by circular
rotatory motion, which is susceptible of accurate
adjustment as well as measurement. It was
originally invented by Cagniard de la Tour, who
made it needlessly complicated by using the force
of the wind to drive the rotating disc as well as
to produce the required note. For this purpose
the speaking holes in the top of the small wind-
chest were pierced in an oblique direction ; those
in the disc sloping in an opposite diagonal. There
was also a counting apparatus attached to the
upper part of the main axis, with two dials for
registering the number of rotations in a given
time. This form has been faithfully reproduced
in every manual of Physics up to now.1 The
name is said to have been somewhat fancifully,
and indeed incorrectly, given it from Homer's
Sirens, on account of its property of singing
under water. It is true that if water be forced
through it after the fashion of the Turbine, a
buzzing or humming sound is produced. This is,
however, of no practical value. The Sirens
named in the Odyssey are nowhere accredited
with this strange power. Seebeck and others
effected material improvements, but the only
two which need special notice are the instru
ments constructed by Helmholtz and Rudolph
Kcenig respectively. The former is figured and
described in that author's ' Tonempfindungen,' 2
and consists essentially of two sirens united on a
single axis, each disc of which possesses four
rows of holes susceptible of being separately
opened, thus giving means for producing a large
variety of intervals.
The upper windchest, which looks downwards,
can be rotated on its feeding- tube so as to bring
about varying changes of phase between the two
discs. With this instrument Helmholtz succeeded
in producing excellent results, using a small
electromotor for driving it at an uniform rate.
1 Deschanel, Nat. Philos. iv. p. 822 ; Everitt's translation. Ganot's
Physics, p. 189 ; Atkinson's transl.
2 Helmholtz, Sensations of Tone, Ellis's transl. p. 243 et se<iq.
SIRMEN.
The Siren of M. Rudolph Kcenig of Paris ia
a far more imposing instrument. It was made
for W. Spottiswoode, Esq., P. R. S., was ex
hibited by the writer at the British Association
meeting at York in iS8i, and is now in the
physical laboratory of 'the College of Science at
Bristol. It is furnished with more than a dozen
rotating discs of different kinds, which fit on to a
vertical spindle, above a windchest of large size
fitted with a keyboard of eight notes. A strong
clockwork actuated by heavy weights forms the
motive power, and an ingenious counting appar
atus is made not only to record the number of
rotations, but also to set going automatically a
watch movement, and thus obtain by one mo
tion of the observer's hand the speed of the
disc, and the time of the observation. By pro
perly computing the rings of perforations, the
harmonic series is given by one disc, and the
enharmonic scale by another. Indeed there is
hardly any law of musical acoustics which it
cannot be made to illustrate.3 For purposes of
demonstration the siren is excellent, and also
for the illustration of perfect musical intervals ;
but for the accurate determination of absolute
pitch it is far inferior to Lissajous's optical
method ; and still more so to Scheibler's tuning-
fork method, described under TONOMETER, and to
Prof. McLeod's Cycloscope. [W.H.S.]
SIRENE, LA. Opera-comique in 3 acts;
words by Scribe, music by Auber. Produced at
the Ope"ra Comique March 26, 1844. In English
as 'The Syren/ at Princess's Theatre* Oct. 14,
1844. [G.]
SIRMEN, or SYRMEN, MADDALENA LOM-
BARDINI DE, -a distinguished violinist, was born
at Venice in 1735, and educated at the Conser-
vatorio dei Mendicanti there. On leaving this
institution she went to study with Tartini at
Padua. Many letters, still extant, from the great
maestro to his girl-pupil, testify to the keen
interest he took in .her artistic career ; one in
particular contains long and detailed advice as
to the direction her technical studies should take,
valuable to any young violinist. The autograph
of this letter is at Venice ; a German translation
of it may be found in J. A. Killer's 'Lebensbe-
schreibungen beruhmterMusik-gelehrten' (trans
lated by Burney).
For some time the young virtuoso, travelled
about Italy with brilliant success, and was con
sidered a worthy rival of Nardini. She eventu
ally married Luigi de Sirmen, a violinist, and
chapel-master at Bergamo. In 1761 they went
to Paris, and played together a concerto for two
violins at the ' Concert spirituel.' At these con
certs, where Madame Sirmen was much admired,
she produced several compositions of her own.
She next went to London, where her brilliant
playing made a considerable sensation. It would
seem, however, that she was unable to sustain
the high position she took at first, for in 1774
we find her accepting an engagement to sing
3 A description of this instrument is to be found in Poggendorf 's
Annalen, and in the Philosophical Magazine, for 1876.
SIRMEN.
SISTINE CHOIR.
519
small parts in operas. In 1782 she was concert-
singer at the Court of Saxony. She died towards
the end of the century.
The following compositions of Madame Sirmen's
were published : — 6 Trios for 2 violins and cello
(Amsterdam) ; 3 Concertos for violin, op. 2
(ditto.) ; 3 concertos for violin, op. 3 (ditto.).
Another concerto is mentioned by J. A. Hiller
as having been engraved at Venice. [F.A.M.]
SIR ROGER DE COVERLY,1 the only one
of the numerous old English dances which has
retained its popularity until the present day, is
probably a tune of north-country origin. Mr.
Chappell (Popular Music, vol. ii) says that he
possesses a MS. version of it called ' Old Roger
of Coverlay for evermore, a Lancashire Horn
pipe,' and in 'The First and Second Division
Violin ' (in the British Museum Catalogue at
tributed to John Eccles, and dated 1705) an
other version of it is entitled ' Roger of Coverly
the true Cheisere way.' Moreover the Calverley
family, from one of whose ancestors the tune is
said to derive its name,2 have been from time
immemorial inhabitants of the Yorkshire village
which bears their name. The editor of the Skene
MS., on the strength of a MS. version dated
1706, claims the tune as Scotch, and says that it is
well known north of the Tweed as 'The Maltman
comes on Monday.' According to Dr. Rimbault
(Notes and Queries, i. no. 8), the earliest printed
version of it occurs in Playford's ' Division-
Violin' (1685). In ' The Dancing Master' it is
first found at page 167 of the 9th edition, pub
lished in 1695, where the tune and directions for
the dance are given exactly as follows : —
Roger of Coverly.
Longways for as many as will.
^^
1 1
t=^=£
The 1. man go below the 2. wo. then round, and so
below the 2. man into his own place ; then the 1. wo. go
below the 2. man, then round him, and so below the 2.
wo. into her own place. The 1. cu. [first couple] cross
over below the 2. cu. and take hands and turn round
twice, then lead up through and cast off into the 2. cu.
Place. [W.B.S.]
SISTINE CHOIR (Ital. H Collegia dei
Cappellani Cantori della Cappella Pontificia).
A Collegiate Body, consisting of 3 2 Choral Chap
lains, domiciled — though not in any special build
ings of their own — at Rome, where, for many
centuries, they have enjoyed the exclusive privi
lege of singing at all those solemn Services, and
1 Or more correctly 'Roger of Coverly.' The prefix 'Sir' is not
found until after Steele and Addisoa had used the name in the Spec
tator.
2 See Notes and Queries, vol. i. no. 23. p. 368.
Ecclesiastical Functions, in which it is customary
for the Supreme Pontiff to officiate in person.
The genealogy of the Papal Choir may be
traced back to a period of very remote antiquity.
It is said— and the tradition is worthy of credit
— that a School for the education of Choristers
was founded in Rome early in the 4th cen
tury, by S. Sylvester, whose Pontificate lasted
from the year 314 to 335. That S. Hilarius
(461-468) established one, not much more than
a century later, is certain. These Institutions,
after the lapse of another hundred years, were
supplemented by new ones, on a larger scale.
On the destruction of the Monastery of Monte
Cassino, by the Lombards, in the year 580, the
Benedictine Fathers fled to Rome ; and, under
the protection of Pope Pelagius II. (5 77-590), esta
blished themselves in a new home, near the
Lateran Basilica, where they opened Schools for
the preparation of Candidates for Holy Orders.
S. Gregory the Great (590-604) took advantage
of this circumstance while working out his system
of reform, and turned the Seminaries to account
as Schools of Singing. Under his care, they pros
pered exceedingly; and, in process of time, at
tained proportions which enabled them to supply
the various Basilicas with Singers, who assembled
on the Greater Festivals, and attended the Pope
wherever he officiated. And thus arose the prac
tice to which the Church was eventually indebted
for the magnificent Services of the Sistine Chapel.
These early ScholaB Cantorum — sometimes
called Orphanotropia, in allusion to the number
of fatherless children which they sheltered — were
governed by an Ecclesiastic, of high rank, called
the Primicerius, who, assisted by a Secundicerius
destined afterwards to succeed him in his office,
exercised absolute control over the Youths and
Children committed to his care. Boys were ad
mitted into the Preparatory School (Parvisium)
at a very early age ; and, if of gentle birth,
became, at the same time, members of the Papal
Household, holding a status analogous to that of
the Pages at a ssecular Court. After passing
through the necessary preparation, the Choristers
were permitted to take part in the most solemn
Services of the Church : and, when their Voices
changed, were either prepared for Holy Orders, or
provided for as Cubicularii. The older members
of the Schola? were called Subdeacons : but, it
is evident that the title was only an honorary
one, since, though constantly taking their part
in Choir, they were never permitted to sing the
Epistle. By their help, Rome was so liberally
supplied with Singers, that, on more than one
occasion, the Pope was able to send out skilled
instructors, for the purpose of encouraging the
purest style of Ecclesiastical Singing in other
countries:3 and, as we hear of no important
modification of the system before the beginning
3 For this purpose, John the Prsecentor was sent to England, during
the Primacy of Theodore, Archbishop of Canterbury (669—690). At
the request of King Pepin (750—768), Simeon, the Secundicerius of the
Koman Schola, was sent, in like manner, to France, but recalled by
Pope Paul I. in 763, that he might succeed to the office of the then
lately deceased Primicerius, Georgius: while, towards the close of
the same century, two celebrated singers, Theodorus and Benedictui'
were sent by Hadrian I. (772-795) to Charlemagne,
520
SISTINE CHOIR.
of the I4th century, we are justified in believing
that it fulfilled its purpose perfectly.
A great change, however, took place during
the Pontificate of Clement V. (1305-1314), who,
in the year 1305, transferred the Chair of S.
Peter to Avignon, leaving his Priniicerius and
Schola Cantorum behind him, in Rome. Too
much oppressed by political and ecclesiastical
troubles to devote his time to the regulation of
details, Pope Clement naturally left the manage
ment of his Chapel to underlings, who suffered
the Music to degenerate to a very unsatisfactory
level. His successor, John XXII. (1316-1334),
issued in 1323 the well-known Bull, 'Docta sanc
torum,' for the purpose of restraining his Singers
from corrupting the simplicity of Plain Chaunt,
either by subjecting it to the laws of Measured
Music, or by overloading it with ornamentation.
It is doubtful whether the provisions of this
Bull were fully carried out after the decease
of its author, whose immediate successor, Bene
dict XII. (1334-1342), was too fond of splendid
Ceremonial to raise any strong objection to
the Music sung by the twelve Choral Chaplains
who officiated in his private Chapel, on the score
of its elaborateness. Indeed, the management of
the Choir employed by Benedict and his succes
sors, at Avignon, differed altogether from that
of the Roman Schola, which was still carried
on under the Primicerius. In Rome, the Choris
ters were taught on the old traditional system,
almost from their infancy. At Avignon, the
most welcome recruits were French and Flemish
Singers, who had already earned a brilliant repu
tation. Now, in those days the best Singers were,
for the most part, the best Composers also ; and
in the Low Countries the Art of Composition
was rapidly advancing towards a state of perfec
tion elsewhere unknown. It followed, therefore,
that the Choir at Avignon contained some of the
greatest Musicians in Europe, and was indebted
to them for Faux-Bourdons, and other Poly
phonic Music, scarcely ever heard at that period
except in the Netherlands.
1^1377 Pope Gregory XI. (1370-1378) returned
to Rome, and carried his Choir with him. The
contrast between the rival Schools now became
more apparent than ever : yet, by some means,
they amalgamated completely. The probability
is, that Gregory himself united them, forming
the two Choirs into one body, which was no
longer called the Schola Cantorum, nor governed
by a Primicerius, but was henceforth known as the
Collegio dei Cappellani Cantori, and placed under
the command of an Ecclesiastic who held the
appointment for life, and bore the title of Maestro
della Cappella Pontificia. The precise year in
which this change took place cannot be ascer
tained ; though it is certain that the new title
was borne by Angelo, Abbat of S. Maria de
Rivaldis^in 1397— twenty years after the return
from Avignon. After this, we hear of no other
Maestro till 1464, when the appointment was
conferred upon Niccola Fabri, Governor of Rome,
who held it for two years. From 1469 onwards
the list includes the names of fourteen Ecclesias-
SISTINE CHOIR.
tics, of whom all, except the last, were Bishops.
The most celebrated of them was Elziario Genet,
of Carpentras,' Vescovoin partibus' (1515-1526?);
called, from his birthplace, Carpentrasso. [See
LAMENTATIONS.] The last of the series was
Monsignor Antonio Boccapadule (1574-1586),
whose relations with the reigning Pope, Sixtus V.
(1585-1590), were disturbed by a misunderstand
ing, particulars of which will be found at pp.
640-641 of vol. ii. That the Pope was highly
incensed at the spirit of insubordination shewn by
his Cantori Cappellani on this occasion is well
known : and it was probably on this account
that, instead of appointing a successor to Mon-
signore Boccapadule, whom he somewhat uncere
moniously deposed, he issued, Sept. 1, 1586, a Bull
(' In suprema'), by virtue of which he conferred
upon the College the right of electing, from among
their own body, an Officer, to whom was com
mitted the duty of governing the Choir, for three,
six, or twelve months, or in perpetuity, accord
ing to the pleasure of the Electors.1 It was clear
that the Maestri so elected must necessarily be
deprived of many of the privileges enjoyed by
the Ecclesiastical Dignitaries who had preceded
them : but, by way of compensation they were
invested with all which were not inseparable
from the status of a Bishop ; and these were
still farther increased, by Pope Clement XIII,
in the Bull 'Cum retinendi,' Aug. 31, 1762.
It was ultimately arranged that the Election
should take place annually, and this custom
has ever since been strictly observed. The first
Maestro so chosen was Giovanni Antonio Merlo,
who served during the year 1587. Since his time,
the Election has always been fixed for Dec. 28 :
and, for very many years, it has been the invari
able custom to elect the principal Bass.
The Flemish Singers, having once obtained a
recognised position in the Choir, soon began to
exercise an irresistible influence over it, and,
through it, over every other Choir in Christendom.
Among the first, of whom we have any certain
account, was Guglielmo Dufay, the Founder of
the older Flemish School, whose name is men
tioned, in the Archives of the Chapel, as early
as 1380, three years only after the formal settle
ment of the College in Rome ; whence it has
been conjectured that he first sang at Avignon,
and afterwards accompanied Pope Gregory XL to
Italy. Dufay died in 1 43 2, leaving many talented
pupils. Among the brightest ornaments of his
School, who sang in, and composed for, the Pon
tifical Chapel, were Egyd Flannel, surnamed
' 1'Enfant,' Jean Redois, Bartholomseus Poignare,
Jean de Curte, surnamed ' Mon Ami,' Jakob
Ragot, and Guillaume de Malbecq. A little
later, these were succeeded by Jean Gomberte
Antonio Cortit, Lambert de Beanon, and, greatest
of all, Josquin des Prds. In the early half of the
1 6th century, the names of Italian, French, and
Spanish Singers, bore a more creditable propor
tion to those of the Netherlanders ; honourable
mention being made of Giov. Scribano, Pietro
Perez, Costanzo Festa, Elizario Genet, surnamed
1 Baini, 1. p. 272, Note 375.
SISTINE CHOIR.
Carpentrasso, Giov. Bonnevin, and Bern. Salinas.
Later still, we hear of Bart. Scobeclo, Jacques
Archadelt, Cristofano Morales, Leonardo Barre,
and Domenico Maria Ferrabosco : while, in 1 555,
the list was crowned by the honoured name of
Palestrina, who was admitted, by command of
Julius III, on January 13, but dismissed before
the end of the year, by Paul IV, in accordance
with the regulation which forbade the reception
of a married man into the College.
The number of Singers, which, at Avignon,
had been limited to twelve, was, by this time,
increased to twenty- four, and, not very long after
wards, raised to thirty-two, which figure still
represents the normal strength of the Choir, though
the assistance of additional ripieni is sometimes
permitted, on extraordinary occasions. After the
formal admission of the Netherlander, the Com
positions sung in the Papal Chapel were almost
entirely supplied by the Cappellani Cantori them
selves. The custom was, when any member of
the College had produced a Mass, or other great
work, to have it roughly written out, and re
hearsed by the entire body of Singers, who after
wards decided whether or not it was worthy of
their acceptance. If the votes were in its favour,
the original autograph was placed in the hands
of the ticrittori — of whom four were usually kept
in full einployment^and by them copied, in
stencilled notes large enough to be read by the
entire Choir at once, into huge Part-Books,1
furmed of entire sheets of parchment, of which
a large collection, richly illuminated and mag
nificently bound, is still preserved among the
Archives of the Sistine Chapel,2 though a vast
number were destroyed in the conflagration which
ensued on the invasion of Rome by Charles V. in
1527. [See PART-BOOKS, App.].
In the year 1565, Pope Pius IV. conferred upon
Palestrina the title of Composer to the Pontifical
Chapel, with an honorarium of three scudi and
thirty baiocchi per month. The Office was re
newed, after Palestrina's death, in favour of Felice
Anerio, but was never conferred on any other
member of the College. The most famous Musi
cians who sang in the Choir, after the expul
sion of Palestrina in 1555, were Giov. Maria
Nanini, admitted in 1577, Luca Marenzio (1594),
Euggiero Giovanelli (1599), and Gregorio Allegri
(1629-1652). Adami also mentions Vittoria,
whose name, however, is not to be found in any
official register. Among more modern Maestri,
the three most notable were, Tomaso Bai, who
held the Office of Maestro in 1714 ; the Cavaliere
1 Mendelssohn, in one of his Letters, gives an amusing description
of one of these enormous books, which he saw carried in front
of Baiiii, as he walked, in Procession, up the Nave of S. Peter's.
2 The Sistine Chapel was added to the Vatican in the year 1473, by
"ope Sixtus IV, for whom it was designed, by Baccio Pinelli, in the
form of a lolty oblong hall, 146 It. 6in. long, arid 50 ft. 6 in. wide, with a
gallery running round three of its sides. Its walls are decorated with
Frescoes, by Signorelli, Botticelli, Koselli, Ghirlandaio, Salviati, and
Penigino. By command of Pope Julius II, the roof was also painted,
V Michael Angelo, and first exhibited to the public, after four years
of labour, on All Saints' Day, 1511, the Pope officiating in person.
The space above the Altar is occupied by the same great Painter's
Fresco of ' The Last Judgment ' ; begun in the year 1533, and com
pleted in 1541. The upper portion of the Chapel, containing the
Vltar, the Pope's Throne, and the Cardinals' Seats, is separated from
the lower by a Screen. The Gallery occupied by the Choir is just
within this Screen, on the right, enclosed by a kind of Grille.
SISTINE CHOIR.
521
Giuseppe Santarelli — Dr. Burneyrs friend — who
entered the Choir as an artificial Soprano Singer
in 1749, and died in 1790 ; and the Abbate
Baini, who was received into the College in 1795,
became Maestro in 1817, and died in 1844. By
special favour of Pope Gregory XVI, Baini re
tained his Office for life — an honour to which,
as the greatest Ecclesiastical Musician of the
present century, he was most justly entitled' : but,
no later Maestro has enjoyed the same privilege.
The present Director, Signer Mustafa, formerly
a 'Cantore Corale, con beneficio,' at the Cathedral
of Agnani, bears only the modest title of ' Direttore
dei Concerting
The two settings of the ' Miserere ' by Bai
and Baini, which, for many years past, have
been used alternately with that of Allegri, are
the only works added to the repertoire of the
Chapel since the death of the last-named
Maestro. Indeed, neither the constitution, nor
the habits, of the College, have, since Pales
trina, undergone any important change — except,
perhaps, in one particular, to be mentioned
presently: and hence it is that its perform
ances are so infinitely valuable, as traditional
indices of the style of singing cultivated at the
period which produced the ' Missa Papae Mar-
celli,' the ' Improperia, ' and the 'Lamentations.'
Except for these traditions, the works of Pales
trina would be to us a dead letter : under their
safe guidance, we feel no more doubt as to > the
Tempi of the ' Missa brevis ' than we do con
cerning those of the ' Sinfonia Eroica.'
The one point in which a change has taken
place is, the selection of Voices : and it is neces
sary to remark, that, as the change did not take
place until seven years after Palestrina's death,
the idea that we cannot sing his Music, in
England, as he intended it to be sung, for lack of
the necessary Voices, is altogether untenable. In
early times, as we have already seen, the Chapel
was supplied with Soprani, and in all probability
with Contralti also, by means of the Orphan otropia,
or ScholaeCantorum, exactly as EnglisLCathedrals
are now supplied by means of the Choristers'
Schools. That this plan was continued until
quite late in the i6th century is sufficiently
proved by the fact that, between 1561 and 1571,
Palestrina held the joint Offices of Maestro di
Cappella and Maestro dei Fanciulli di Coro at
the Church of S. Maria Maggiore, while, between
1539 and 1553 the post of Maestro de* Putti,
at the Cappella Giulia, was successively filled
by Archadelt, Rubino, Basso, Ferrabosco, and
Roselli. During the latter half of the i6th
century, however, these youthful Treble Voices
were gradually supplanted by a new kind of
adult male Soprano, called the Soprano falsetto,
imported, in the first instance, from Spain, in
which country it was extensively cultivated, by
means of some peculiar system of training, the
secret of which has never publicly transpired.3
3 Nevertheless, this secret does not seem to be altogether lost. A
lady traveller in Spain and Portugal, writing sume six or seven
years ago, amusingly expresses her surprise, on discovering that cer
tain hi?h flute-like notes, which she believed to have been produced
by some beautiful young girl, really emanated fr im the throat of a
burly individual with a huge black beard and whiskers t
522
SISTINE CHOIR.
At the close of the i6th century, Spanish Soprani
were in very great request ; and were, indeed,
preferred to all others, until the year 1601, when
a far more momentous change was introduced.
During nearly the whole of the 1 7th and the
greater .part of the i8th centuries, the Theatres
of Europe were supplied with adult male Soprano
and Contralto Voices, preserved by a process so
barbarous, that at one time it was forbidden, in
Italy, on pain of death. Yet, notwithstanding
this penalty, and its inherent wickedness, the
system prospered, and enriched the Stage with
many of its most accomplished ornaments, such
as Nicolini Grimaldi, Senesino, Carestini, Pacchie-
rotti, Farinelli, and others. It has been said
that Farinelli's wonderful Soprano Voice was
accidentally preserved : and the story is probably
true ; for it is certain that very fine Voices are
sometimes preserved by.accident,and quite reason
able to suppose that such accidents may very
frequently happen, though, should the sufferers
possess no musical talent, one is not likely to hear
of them. In these purely accidental cases, no
Singer, with a good Voice, has ever been refused
admission into the Pontifical Choir : but the
transgression of the Law, which was formerly
punishable with death, now renders the offender
de facto excommunicate, and therefore effectually
prevents his reception into the Collegio. One of
the most learned and accomplished Musicians in
Home, now in command of one of its most
celebrated Choirs, remembers the admission of
three artificial Voices, accidentally produced,
while he was studying under Baini. Two of them
proved too weak to be used, except as ripieni ; but
the third developed into a magnificent Soprano.
The first Soprano Singer of this kind per
mitted to sing in the Sistine Chapel, was a Priest
named Girolamo Rosini, a member of the Con
gregation of S. Philip Neri, who was received
into the College in 1601, and died in 1644.
Since his time, such Voices have always been
found in the Choir : and such a Voice is now
actually possessed, by its present head, Signer
Mustafa. But, the trained Soprano falsetto, which
needs no accident to produce it, is not yet extinct.1
Italian Choir-Masters draw a careful distinction
between the different Voices they employ. The
Voee bianco, or naturale, is by no means uncom
mon, but produces only Contralto Singers. The
true adult Soprano, arte fatta (made by method2),
is an excessively rare Voice, produced ' rather in
the head than in the chest or throat,' and lasting,
generally, to extreme old age, to the astonishment
of the uninitiated hearer, who cannot understand
its co-existence with a long white beard.3 The
distinguished Musician on whose authority we
make these statements, had, quite lately, three
such Soprani in his Choir. One of them died, a
short time ago, at the age of 74> singing to the
1 These statements are founded on information supplied to us by
gentlemen resident in Rome, -whose high position and long experience
render their evidence more than ordinarily trustworthy.
2 I.e. not by operation.
3 In Adami da Bolsena's ' Osservazioni ' (Roma 1711) will be found
numerous portraits of Soprani and Contralti, with long beards-
many of them Priests.
SISTINE CHOIR.
last. The other two are still singing Treble, at
70 years of age. There is also, at the Church of
S. Giovanni Laterano, a Youth of 1 7 or 1 8, whose
Voice is said to be the most heavenly Soprano
imaginable ; and our informant expresses his
full belief that he will succeed in preserving it
through life. The occurrence of such phenonena
is, however, so exceptional, that the late Pope,
Pius IX, founded the Scuola di S. Salvatore, near
S. Peter's, for the express purpose of supplying
the Choirs of Rome with Boys, subject, as in
England, to be discharged on the breaking of
their Voices.* [See MUTATION.]
It remains only to say a few words concerning
the style of Singing practised by this matchless
Choir, and the lessons to be learned from it.
For the last three centuries at least — quite
certainly ever since the production of the * Missa
Papae Marcelli ' — the one great aim of the
Maestri has been, to bring the Music into the
most intimate possible connection with the Service
of which it forms part. One of the most important
duties of the elected head of the Choir is to stand
at the Grille, and carefully watch the Altar, in
order that he may make signs to the Conductor,
as often as it becomes desirable for him to retard
or accelerate the Tempo, to introduce a forte, or
to calm down the tone to pianissimo. At certain
points in the Gloria and Credo, when the Cele
brant takes off his Berretta, and bows his head,
a pianissimo is always introduced. [See MASS.]
When the Celebrant proceeds from the Sedilia to
the Altar, the Tempo of the last Amen is so ar
ranged that it may terminate exactly at the re
quired moment. The Conductor beats time with a
roll of Music called the 5Solfa; and almost always
with a simple up and down motion, two beats being
accorded to each Semibreve in Common Time,
and one only, when there are three Semibreves
in the Measure. As the Music is not divided into
Bars, this method, which has been in use from
time immemorial, answers its purpose perfectly.
There are, also, certain traditional ornaments,
and forms of expression, which are profound mys
teries to the uninitiated. For instance, the Second
and Third Lamentations, on the three last days in
Holy Week, are sung, as is generally supposed,
by a high Voice : but, when that Voice is too
weak for the task, it is assisted by another,
which, even in the most difficult Abbellimenti
keeps so exactly with it, that the two Voices are
invariably mistaken for one. Again, there has
long been a traditional way of making crescendi
and diminuendi, which has astonished even the
most experienced Choir Masters. The secret of this
wonderful effect is, that, not only the amount of
tone produced by each individual Voice, but the
actual number of Voices employed, is gradually
•J There are three principal Choirs, in Borne, besides that of which
we are writing : (1) that of S. Peter's, now under the direction of .
Salvatore Meluzzi, consisting of from 16 to 18 members, of whom fl\
possess the Voce bianca, two being Boys ; (2) that of S. G10^1""
Laterano, consisting of 12 members, of whom two are Boys ; and W
that of S. Maria Maggiore, consisting of eight members, witi
Soprano Voices.
6 Pronounced S<51fa, with the accent on the first syllable, ina
•obedience enforced by this time-honoured instrument is so strict.
that an Italian proverb says, of an imperious man, E'jli batte la so\ju<
SISTINE CHOIR.
increased in the one case, and diminished in
the other. The marvellous effects produced by
the ' Miserere ' have already been described,
at PP- 335~33^ °f v0^- "• j1 an^ those associated
with the ' Improperia,' at pp. 1-2. Such effects
would no doubt be condemned by English Choir-
Masters as 'tricks' — but they are not tricks. No
means can be so condemned, with justice, pro
vided the effect they produce be artistic and
legitimate. If a Pianoforte passage can be better
played by crossing the hands than by holding them
in the usual position, the performer who refuses to
cross his hands, because he finds no directions to
that effect in the book, is a tasteless pedant.
There is no pedantry connected with the effects
produced by the Sistine Choir. When its mem
bers conceive a really artistic effect, they pro
duce it, in the best way they can ; and we have
no right to speak evil of expedients used for so
legitimate a purpose. No doubt the Frescoes
on the roof and walls of the Chapel, the Vest
ments of the Pope and Cardinals, and the general
magnificence of the Ceremonial all tend to im
press the listener : but, the great secret of the
effect produced by the Music is, that it is always
in agreement with the Ceremonial — always the
right thing in the right place.
At the present moment, the Pontifical Choir
is under a cloud. It sang, for the last time, in
its official capacity, at the Church of S. Maria
del Popolo, on Sept. 8, 1870. On the 2oth of the
same month the Sardinian troops entered Home,
and all things came to an end. The Pope con
tinued the customary honorarium to his Cappel-
lani, but, as a Choir, they were disbanded ; and
Signer Mustafa now lives at his birthplace,
Spoleto, only coming to Rome on the few rare
days when the Choir still sing together, namely
(i) when the Pope holds a Consistory, with all
the old Ceremonies, which are still carefully ob
served, as of old, in the Sistine Chapel, though
in such strict privacy that the Rite is witnessed
only by those who take part in it ; and (2), at a
public Service held, annually, on the Anniversary
of the Pope's Consecration, at the Church of
S.Pietro in Vincoli. One of the most able and ex
perienced Directors of Choral Music in Europe,2
who was fortunate enough to be present at this
last-named Service, in 1878, concludes a letter,
in which he has kindly furnished us with a de
scription of it, with the following words—' The
effects produced by the Sistine Choir in S. Pietro
in Vincoli were beyond anything I had ever before
heard, or conceived. But a repetition of them
is only possible under the same circumstances.'
let us trust that the time is not far distant,
when the same circumstances may occur more
frequently. [W.S.R.]
1 We mentioned In our article MISERERE [vol. ii. p. 3365), that a copy
of that celebrated work was published, at Lugano, in 1840, by a certain
aobil TJomo, Sig. Alessandro Geminiani, Filarmonico, e Mathema-
««>,' with -whose name we were, otherwise, unacquainted. We did
not know, at that time, that the work was reallv edited, and the
preface written, by Alfleri, who, however, did not wish his name to be
publicly associated with it. This circumstance, of the correctness
of which we are assured, on the highest possible authority, adds, of
course, immeasurably, to the value of this now very scarce edition.
2 Dr HullaJo.
SKENE MANUSCRIPT.
SIXTH. The interval which embraces six
degrees of the scale. There are three forms — the
major, the minor, and the augmented, (i.) The
major sixth, as CA, contains 9 mean semitones,
and the ratio of its limiting sounds in the true
scale is 5 : 3. It is a concord, and in harmony is
regarded as the first inversion of the minor com
mon chord. (2.) The minor sixth, as CAb or EC,
contains 8 semitones, and the ratio of its limiting;
sounds is 8 : 5. It is also a concord, and in har
mony regarded as the first inversion of the major
common chord. (3.) The augmented sixth, which
is arrived at by flattening or sharpening one of the
extreme sounds of a major sixth, as Db B or Ab F J,
contains 10 semitones, and the ratio of the limit
ing sounds is approximately 125:72. It is a
discord, and is usually resolved by moving each
note a semitone outwards to the octave, the
sharpening or flattening of one of the extreme
sounds already implying a straining in that
direction. [See HARMONY.] [C.H.H.P.]
SKENE MANUSCRIPT. A collection of
airs, chiefly Scotish, though with a considerable
admixture of foreign dance tunes and English
vocal melodies, supposed to have been written at
various dates between 1615 and 1635. In 1818
the MS. came into the possession of the Faculty
of Advocates, Edinburgh, along with a charter
chest of documents, by bequest from Miss Eliza
beth Skene of Curriehill and Hallyards in Mid
lothian. She was the last representative in line
of the family, and great-great-granddaughter of
John Skene of Hallyards, who died in 1644, and
was the original possessor and probably also the
writer of some parts of the MS. It consisted
originally of seven distinct parts, but these have
since been bound together, and now form one
tiny oblong volume 6^ inches by 4^. It is writ
ten in tablature for a lute with five strings, a
mode of writing very convenient for the player,
as it points out exactly the string to be struck,
and the fret to be pressed. As amateur scribes
however were rarely correct either in their
barring, or in marking the lengths of the notes,
a translator into modern notation requires much
patience, as well as knowledge and ingenuity, to
decipher and correct the uncertainties of these
MSS. In the present instance the work of trans
lation was undertaken by George Farquhar
Graham, whose fitness for the task is sufficiently
shown by the article 'Music' which he wrote
for the 7th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britan-
nica. In 1838 Mr. William Dauney, F.S.A.Scot.,
urged by his friends and encouraged by the mem
bers of the Bannatyne and Maitland Clubs, pub
lished the translation in 4to with a very learned
preliminary dissertation on the music of Scot
land, and an appendix by Finlay Dun containing
an analysis of the structure of Scotish music.
[See DAUNEY, vol. i. p. 431 b.]
The MS. contains 115 airs ; of these 85 were
published, n were found to be duplicates, and
the rest were rejected as being either unintel
ligible or uninteresting. The airs of Scotish origin
appear to be about 45, of which 25 were pre
viously unknown. Many of the latter are no
524
SKENE MANUSCRIPT.
doubt sufficiently commonplace in style, but a
few are really fine melodies worthy of a place in
our present collections, and worthy of the atten
tion of rising poets. In some instances the airs
are in a simple unadorned vocal state, a few being
even pentatonic ; of which Lady Rothiemay's Lilt,
Lady Laudian's Lilt, and the first part of ' Kilt
your coat, Maggie/ may be named as examples.
In most cases the first half strain of the air is
simple, the repetition more florid; this is fre
quently followed by variations — or divisions as
they were then called — consisting of scale and
other passages well fitted to show the dexterity
of the player. Like many other Scotish tunes, a
considerable number of the airs take some trouble
to avoid the key-note as a close. [See SCOTISH
Music, p. 446.] They have also that almost in
variable characteristic of Scotish melody, the oc
currence of phrases constructed on the harmony
of the subdominant — the fourth of the scale ;
while in the national airs of most other countries
a preference is given to phrases on the dominant
— the fifth of the scale ; both of course being
subordinate to phrases on the tonic, usually the
most numerous in popular music. The occurrence
of the subdominant harmony is the more singular
when we consider that the fourth is one of the
sounds often omitted in Scotish music. The
explanation seems to be that the sixth is of fre
quent use as an emphatic note, and though
sometimes it has to be treated as the relative
minor, more frequently it is accompanied as the
third of the subdominant.
The fact of so many duplicates being found in
the MS. has caused the remark to be made that
the seven parts must have belonged to different
individuals. Nothing can be interred as to the
date of either part. Part III. however differs
from the others in certain respects, and not im
probably belonged to some other member of the
family. It is written for a lute tuned CFADG.
Parts VI. and VII. are for a lute tuned AD AD A.
The only air that is said to bring the MS.
down to a later date than has been claimed
for it (1635) occurs in Part VI. and is named
* Peggie is ouer the sie with the souldier.' This
is the tune of an English ballad included in the
catalogue issued by Thackeray in 1689. There
is a copy of the ballad, printed about 1655, in
the Euing collection of Glasgow University, and
a still earlier copy in the Roxburgh Ballads ; and
we learn from Mr. Chappell's list of the publishers
of black-letter ballads that his date is from 1620
to 1629, both prior to the date claimed for the
MS, The simple Skene versions of some of our
old melodies, two of which have already been
given in this work, show how little we really
know of the early forms of our airs. [See SCOT-
JSH Music 441 b, 445 6, 446a.] The discovery in
this MS. of these and of some other tunes, other
wise unknown until the middle of the following
century, proves that first appearance in print is
no guide whatever to actual age. The appearance
also in it of so many as 25 previously unknown
airs leads to the belief that the loss of ancient
melodies may have been as great even as that of
SKENE MANUSCRIPT.
songs, in regard to which Ritson, in a letter to
George Paton, after enumerating about 120, adds
that he believes he has the names of as many
more, none of which he had ever been able to
recover. Several of the parts of the Skene MS.
contain airs which date themselves; such as
Ostend (taken 1604) ; Prince Henry's masque
(1610); Lady Elizabeth's masque (1613).
List of the 115 tunes contained in the
seven parts of the SJcene MS.
The first row of figures shows the order in which
they appear in the original ; the second is that
of Mr. Dauney's volume. The asterisks point
out the duplicates, and the figures after the
names show their place in the MS. The omitted
tunes are marked by daggers. The double
dagger in the first line of figures between 29
and 30 shows the place of a tune omitted in
Mr. Dauney's list.
i.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
60.
51.
52.
53.
64.
65.
38.
40.
76.
10.
63.
8.
41.
t
59.
69.
47.
85.
60.
68.
42.
78.
36.
t
64.
22.
20.
9.
67.
t
37.
25.
1.
34.
27.
17.
18.
84.
*
*
21.
t
*
15.
35.
29.
3.
*
12.
58.
23.
33.
70.
77.
66.
74.
65.
PABT I. (24 leaves.)
Male Simme.
Doun in yon barike.
0 Slllie soule alace.
Long ere onie old man.
The Spanishe Ladie.
My dearest sueate is faniest fra me.
1 long for your vergiiritie. »4a.
Hutcheson's Galziard.
Pitt in an inche and mair of it.
A French volt.
Lady Elizabeth's Maske.
Kette Bairdie.
Trumpeters Ourrand. *50.
Joy to the persone.
Comedians maske.
Aderneis Lilt.
Sommersetts Maske.
John Devesonnes pint of wine.
Horreis Galziard. #45.
Froggis Galziard.
I cannot line and want thee.
I mett her in the medowe.
Prettie weil begunn man.
Prince Henreis Maske. Finis quod Skine.
PAET II.
(8 leaves.)
(Fragment.)
Lady wilt thou love me.
The lass o Glasgowe.
Shoe looks as shoe wold lett me.
Alace yat I came owr the moor and left my love behind
me. »42.
Bone Jeane makis meikill of me.
Let never crueltie dishonour bewtie.
My love she winns not her away.
Jennet drinks no water.
PART ill. (12 leaves.)
A Frenche.
Scerdustis. 66.
Jlj Ladie Bothemayes Lilt. 96.
Blue breiks.
Aberdeins Currand.
Scullione. 83.
My Ladie Laudians Lilt. *84.
Lesleis Lilt.
The Keiking Glasse.
To dance about the Bailzeis dubb.
I left my love behind me. 28.
Alace this night yat we suld sinder.
Pitt on your shirt (mail) on Monday. * 65.
Horreis Galziard. * 19 (both omitted).
1 dowe not qunne (when) cold.
My mistres blush is bonie.
I long for her verginitie. 7.
A Saraband.
Trumpeters Currant (anonymous). 13.
PART IV. (12 leaves.)
What if a day.
Floodis of tears.
Nightingale.
The willow trie.
Marie me marie me quoth the bonie lass.
56. f
67. t
68. 72.
59.
60.
61.
62.
t
54.
46.
6.
SKENE MANUSCRIPT.
My Lord Haye's Currand.
J<^ane is best of onie.
What high offences hes my fair love taken.
Alman Nicholas.
-Currand HeyaKSIr John Hopes Currand).
Hunter's Carrier.
Blue ribbenn at the bound rod.
I serue a worthie ladle.
SKETCHES.
525
63. 49.
PART V. (22 leaves.)
64. 80. Canaries.
65. * Pitt on your shirt (mall) on Monday. 41.
66. 71. Scerdustis. *33.
67. 60. She mowpit It coming owr the lie.
68. 24. Adew Bundle.
69. 31. Thrie sheips skinns.
70. 65. Chrlchtons gud nicht.
71. 28. Alace I lie my alon I am lik to die awld,
72. » I love for love again. 98.
73. 73. Sincopas (Cinque-pace).
74. 55. Almane Delorne.
75. 51. Who learned you to dance and a to wdle?
76. 19. Remember me at eveninge.
77. f Love is a labour in vaine.
78. 26, I dare not vowe I love thee.
79. f My Lord Dingwalls Currand.
80. 83. Brangill of Poictu.
81. 53. Pantalone.
82. 57. Ane Almane Moreiss.
83. 81. Scullione. *37.
84. » My LadieLaudians Lilt. S3.
85. t Queins Currand.
PART VI. (10 leaves.)
86. 61. Then wilt thou goe and leave me her.
87. 48. I will not goe to my bed till I sultl die.
88. 13. The Flowres of the Forest.
89. 82. The fourth measur of the Buffins.
90. 39. Shackle of Hay.
91. 62. Com love lett us walk into the Springe.
92. 45. Sa merrie as we have bein.
93. 11. Kilt thy coat Magge, cilt thy coat ti.
94. 75. Shipeherd saw thou not.
95. 2. Peggie is ouer ye sie wi ye souldier.
98. 4. Ladye Rothemayes Lilt. » 34.
97. 52. Crania vincit amor.
98. 5. I love my love lor love again. »72.
99. 14. Ostend.
100. t Sir John Moresons Currant,
lul. t Preludium.
PART VII. (14 leaves.)
102. f Exercises.
103. 44. Gilcreichs Lilt.
104. 43. Blewcappe.
105. SO. Lady Cassilis Lilt.
108. * BlewBreiks. 35.
107. 32. Post Ballangowne.
108. 7. John Andersonne my Jo.
109. 16. Good night and God be with you.
HO. f A Sarabande.
111. t Lik as the dum Solsequium.
112. | Come sueat love lett sorrow cease.
113. 79. Veze Setta.
114. t A Sarabande. PJ.M W.I
SKETCH (Ital. Schizzo; Germ. Skizze; Fr.
Esquisse). A short Movement, usually written
for the Pianoforte, and deriving its name, in
some cases, from its vividly descriptive character,
in others, from the slightness of its construction.
Among Sketches of the purely descriptive class,
the most perfect examples we possess are Stern-
dale Bennett's three well-known Movements, en
titled, 'The Lake,' ' The Mill-stream,' and 'The
Fountain ' (op. 10). In freshness of conception,
and finished delicacy of treatment, these delicious
little inspirations stand absolutely alone, in their
own peculiar sphere. Their truthfulness to
Nature is as remarkable as their loyal submission
to the laws of Art. Though rightly called
Sketches, because each one presents a single
feature, only, selected from the infinite variety
of detail comprised within the limits of a beau
tiful landscape, they are, in reality, elaborately
finished pictures, reminding us of three little
water-colour drawings by Turner, or three bright
flashes from the pencil of Girtin. And, like the
works of the last-named Painter, they are so
thoroughly English, that we should seek in vain
for the realisation of their poetical imagery in
the scenery of any other country than our own.
As surely as Schubert's ' Forelle ' lived in a
German trout-stream — and, who can hear the
Song, and doubt it? — so surely does the rush
of Bennett's flashing wavelets turn an English
mill-wheel.
Mendelssohn's three little Capriccios, written,
in Wales, for the cousins of Professor Taylor,
and now known as op. 16, have also been pub
lished under the title of Sketches, and may fairly
lay claim to it, though it was not given to them
by the Composer himself. The first of these, in
A minor, was suggested by the perfume of a
carnation ; the second, in E minor, by the fairy
trumpets of the Ecremocarpus, a spray of which
the Composer drew upon the margin of the
original autograph ; and the third, in E major,
by a little Welsh Rivulet — a 'real actual Rivulet '
— at Coed-du, near Mold, in Flintshire, which
particularly struck Mendelssohn's fancy, and the
tiny waterfalls, smooth reaches, and other details
of which he painted, so carefully, from Nature,
that, years afterwards, his manner of performing
the Music suggested to Schirmer the idea of a
charming little water-colour drawing,1
Schumann's four 'Skizzen' for the Pedal-
Pianoforte (op. 58), are of an altogether different
class, and derive their name from the Composer's
modest appreciation of their calibre; as does, also,
Stephen Heller's pretty, but certainly not unfin
ished little Study, entitled 'Esquisse.' [W.S.R.]
SKETCHES. SKETCH-BOOKS. SKETCH-
ING, THE PRACTICE OF. A broad distinction
must be drawn between the preliminary Sketches
made during the progress of a great work, and
the modest Movements described in the foregoing-
article. Though called by the same name, the
two forms have nothing whatever in common.
One of the most accomplished Art-critics of
modern times assures us that the conceptions of
true genius invariably present themselves to the
inspired imagination, even in their earliest mani
festation, in a complete and perfect form ; that
they spring from the Artist's brain, as Minerva,
adult, and fully armed, sprang from the forehead
of Jupiter. No doubt, this is true enough, in a
certain sense; but, only so far as the general
form of the idea is concerned. Among the trea
sures presented to the University of Oxford by
the late Mr. Chambers Hall, there is a little square
of paper, which, if we attempt to press the canon
beyond a certain point, cuts away the ground
from under it. On one side of this priceless sheet
is drawn the seated figure of a female skeleton,
surrounded by faint lines indicating the contours
of its delicate covering of flesh. On the other,
is presented the figure of the Holy Child, ex
quisitely drawn with the bistre pen, yet not
finished with sufficient care to satisfy the Artist,
who has several times repeated the feet, with,
certain changes of position, on the margin of the
i See vol. ii. pp. 264-265. The Autograph Is headed ' Am Bach.'
526
SKETCHES.
paper. Now, these studies were made by Raf-
faelle himself, in preparation for the famous
picture known as 'La bella Giardiniera ' ; and
they prove, when compared with the finished
painting in the Gallery of the Louvre, that,
though the general features of the subject may
have presented themselves to the Artist's mind,
in the form of an instantaneous revelation, its
details suffered many changes of intention, before
they perfectly satisfied the mind of their creator.
The Musician deals with his Composition as
Raffaelle dealt with this wonderful picture.
Each Master, it is true, has his own way of
working. Some writers are known to have re
frained from committing their ideas to paper,
until they had first perfected them, in all their
details ; though we cannot doubt that they
modified those details, many times, and very ex
tensively, by means of some clear process of
mental elaboration, before they began to write.
Others have left innumerable MS. copies of their
several works, each one complete in itself, but
differing, in some more or less important par
ticular, from all its fellows. Some very great
writers made one single copy serve for all pur
poses ; obliterating notes, and crossing out long
passages, at every change of intention ; and so
disfiguring their MSS., by blots and erasures,
that those only who have carefully studied then*
handwriting can be trusted to decypher them.
Others, again — the Sketchers, par excellence—
began even their greatest works by noting down
a few scraps of Subject, which they afterwards
modified, enlarged, and improved ; scribbling
a dozen different ideas on the back of a single
sheet of paper, or in the random pages of a
note-book ; and changing their plans so fre
quently, that, when a complete copy was written
out at last, it was only by careful examination
that the germ of the original thought could be
recognised in any part of it. It is impossible
to say which of these methods of Composition is
the best ; for the greatest of the Great Masters
have used them all; each one selecting that which
best accorded with the bias of his own individual
genius. Let us consider a few examples of each ;
for, no lessons are so precious as those which the
Master permits us to learn, for ourselves, while
watching him at work in his atelier.
And, first, let us clearly bear in mind the
difference between a Sketch and an unfinished
Picture. The analogy, in these matters, between
Music and Painting is very striking, and will
help us much. In both, the Sketch is made
while the Artist's mind is in doubt. When his
plan is fully matured — and not before — he draws
its outline upon his canvas, or lays out the
skeleton of his Score upon paper, leaving the
details to be filled in at his leisure. The Sketch
is never used again ; but the outline is gradually
wrought into a finished Picture ; the skeleton
Score, into a perfect Composition. Should the
completion of the work be interrupted, the
Sketches remain in evidence of the Artist's changes
of intention, while the half-covered canvas, or
the half-filled Score, show the foundation of his
SKETCHES.
ripe idea, with just so much of the superstructure
as he had time or inclination to build upon it.
Among our promised examples, we shall call
the reader's attention to MS. reliques of both
classes.
The earliest known example of a bond fide
Sketch— like the earliest Rota, the earliest Poly
phonic Motet, and the earliest specimen of a Vocal
Score — is a product of our own English School.
It dates from the middle of the i6th century;
and was written, by John Shepherde, either for
the purpose of testing the capabilities of a Sub
ject which he intended to use as the basis of a
Motet, or other Vocal Composition, or, for the
instruction of a pupil.1 Our knowledge of Shep-
herde's Compositions is too limited to allow of
the identification of the particular work to which
this passage belongs ; but, by a curious coincid
ence, the Subject corresponds exactly with that
of the ' Gloria ' of Dr. Tye's Mass, ' Euge bone,'
though its treatment is altogether different.
We doubt whether it would be possible to
find a pendant to this very interesting example ;
for the Polyphonic Composers seem generally to
have refrained from committing their ideas to
paper, until they were perfected. So far was Pitoni,
one of the last of the race, from advocating this
habit of sketching, that he is said to have once
written out a Mass for twelve Choirs in separate
Parts, beginning with the Bass of the Twelfth
Choir, and finishing each Part before he began
the next — an effort which, if it did not rest upon
good evidence, we should regard as incredible.
Sebastian Bach does not appear to have been
addicted to the practice of sketching ; but, like
Painters, who can never refrain from retouching
their Pictures so long as they remain in the
studio, he seems to have been possessed by an
almost morbid passion for altering his finished
Compositions. Autograph copies of a vast number
of his Fugues are in existence, changed, some
times, for the better, and sometimes, it cannot
be denied, for the worse. Some twenty years
ago, an edition of the ' Wohltemperirte Clavier '
was published at Wolfenbxittel, giving different
readings of innumerable passages, and, with
singular perversity, almost always selecting the
least happy one for insertion in the text. The
Subject of the first Fugue, in C major, exists,
in different MSS., as at a, and at b, in the
following examples ; and, as Professor Macfarren
i Printed by Hawkins, History, App. 10.
SKETCHES.
has pointed out, the change is not a mere melodic
one, but seriously affects the Counterpoint.
(«) mm
fev-*— rfr^E ^-n— • •
SKETCHES.
-. r* i -i ..i . -E i^
527
! — M ID
• m J • . =;
— *3i- • &-
= : 22 ^
•& »s
^-H
• — ^^
] * "^"*- ^"<s
--— U
$= — n
^ -Sjn
(&)
-?(6>
fb-{- -— 1 -
.-) i — j -. - -l-i
fl
— nsr-H
GtC*
In the Fifth Fugue, in D major, the Subject, at
a certain bar, is given in one copy in the original
key, and in another in the Relative Minor. A
hundred other examples might be cited ; but
these will show the Composer's method of work
ing, and prove that, though he made no trial
Sketches in the earlier stage of the process, he
was no less subject to changes of intention after
wards than the most fastidious of his brethren.
Handel, as a general rule, wrote currentecalamo;
making but a single copy, and frequently com
pleting it without the necessity for a single
erasure. But though his pen was emphatically
that 'of a ready writer,' it could not always
keep pace with the impetuosity of his genius ;
nor were his ideas always unaccompanied by
instantaneous afterthoughts: and in these cases
he altered the MS. as he proceeded, with
reckless disregard to the neatness of its ap
pearance ; intruding smears, blots, and scratches,
with such prodigality, that it is sometimes not
a little difficult to understand his final decision.
But these changes bear such unmistakable evi
dence of having been suggested at the moment,
that they can scarcely be regarded as after
thoughts. When he really changed his mind — as
in ' Kejoice greatly,' ' But who may abide ?' and
'Why do the nations ? ' — he made a second copy.
Sometimes, also, he made a Sketch. Very few
examples of such preparatory studies have been
preserved ; but these few are of indescribable in
terest. Among others, the Fitzwilliam Library
at Cambridge possesses one, which can only be
compared to a 'trial plate' of Rembrandt's. This
priceless fragment — here published for the first
time — is a study for the ' Anaen ' Chorus in the
' Messiah.' Before deciding upon the well-known
passage of Canonic Imitation, which forms so
striking a feature in this wonderful Movement,
the Composer has tested the capabilities of his
subject, as Shepherde tested his, two hundred
years before him ; only, not content with trying
it once, he has tried it three times, at. different
distances, and in the inverted form. The identity
of the passages marked (a), (6), and (c), with
those of the finished Chorus marked (e), (d), and
(/), is indisputable ; though the Sketches are in
the key of C, and in Alia, breve time.
^S, j ' ! p£u_u y J i
T* u ^^i^. '-• i ' * U ^t*-0-^
J rrrr • -rfcrr -fr?
| i J ! < , * ! i
.'•»• i mISS. • m
• - * • J J
• ^? • ^_
I' fi *~*Z
J *L-M __ J *
r^- 1
2_ "A j
"r^- * i*
.-,
•
g- j
r
1
i i 1 1
ii
I -
^ !
p
- 1 -" "I
tit 122 <J 11^
7, (I
• •
- « » *2. \\^
|H ••
T^ff- ^' -*•? ^r r-i-- ~
1 ' j i
i J 'J 2
- 1 - ! ! ^^
J -^- -^
J m~ 22 ,. ~.
• X
•
f^s
II
~*1 1 "'
i r5 -
n(0 1 ,
-+k£
, J I | r
1 1 1
V - ^ j— 3
T ft? ; J
" ^, '
A (* - * f.
J - - * m J
» => . m
i^\\ / %
5 - BE • z
1IZ3CIS
m m - a «
r r
i V
i -JjJ J3-J-
nTTtf
"V i 1 (^> •
• '"^^
J" l\* *•
ris m m
a » T
"- N' t
- i • |
- - • -rj-
1 1
1 1
1^
- 1
_| |_^.-^_
— J 1
<» •! ;Ei*::±E
^-"; — •* — Z— — — i
FStp^s^aLM
: p — '-•— f
I ' '
\.-£L~3sL J.J. .<c.
* !
IT
" m m
I!
r ^^
|i
r ~
r
(d) Compare •with (6).
n * - _ K .
— P^***, 1
V *JT
A Hi'
«•_ «,
* * '
f(\) *-j p • •
m "P
"v - r r '
hfc * i i ^ •
• P
*J 1 U j
Bar 63. - _^_ e
^fcrr-
,N-
^±_tf_L/ =_
**i5l
3i=i= ~=3b
^ H
*
^g^^-' - fer r • : '
^ • ;feXj ,^- ^>ojq
-• 1 T"^""* — * "^
— nJr~j^
=«*^ — 1 _ ^-kstd
(e) Compare with fa); and also 'with bars
42 et seg. of the finished Chorus.
: ' £— ££-• ^
=^M^
^^fcL
^r-^-f— V-
r-r •• t
^ 1 ^L_i
-«— ; * 1
1 ^
_ J"5S_
m
C?- •- ; ; ^w i
pij^g-.^ . n J - r- J!!^-.^-
^^^= -ES^p
-P — — f
-T3-3-^f
^ — [
~fcr- " ^t^T ^^^^
—. — «— • — •— — !"-*! — »— 1»— F—
1 »> — *
5 I J^-
t-t-r^T
_^_1 — i
- — i — j — t — i — — . — i -*
^-^f^^-
523
SKETCHES.
(/) Compare with (e).
-4-
The connection of these passages exemplifies
the legitimate use of the Sketch in a very in
structive manner.1 Having first tried the possi
bilities of his Subject, Handel decided upon the
form of Imitation which best suited his purpose,
and then wavered no more. The complete Score
of the Chorus shows no signs of hesitation, in this
particular, though the opening of the Fugue
exhibits strong traces of reconsideration. The
primary Subject, which now stands as at (h\ was
first written as at (#) ; and the rejected notes
are roughly crossed out with the pen, in the ori
ginal autograph, to make room for the after
thought. The Movement, therefore, aifords us
examples both of preliminary Sketches and an
amended whole.
etc.
Mozart almost always completed his Compo
sitions before committing any portion of them
to writing. Knowing this — as we do, on no less
positive authority than that of his own word —
we find no difficulty in understanding the his
tory of the Overture to ' II Don Giovanni.' The
vulgar tradition is, that he postponed the prepar
ation of this great work, from sheer slothfulness,
until the evening before the production of the
Opera ; and, even then, kept the copyists waiting,
while he completed his MS. The true story is,
that he kept it back, for the purpose of recon
sideration, until the very last moment, when,
though almost fainting from fatigue, he wrote it
out, without a mistake, while his wife kept him
awake by telling him the most laughable Volks-
marchen she could remember. It is clear that,
i We believe the musical world is indebted, for the identification
of these Sketches, to the late Mr. Vincent Novello, by whom the
writer's attention was drawn to the subject.
i » rf A- / • A " 1* 1™ ft
-U_£ — p_i .
s • ,* *^
i i
• " iv
• 1 — ^--.—
uT
(h)
etc.
t \L j* _ £ *B
ff"tf^/t « • lO i A
i • 1 -•'
z g v - C Lrt_l^
f hj* r "i •_ .. 1. m
B
J i —
SKETCHES.
in this case, the process of transcription was a
purely mechanical one. He knew his work so
perfectly, by heart, that the peals of laughter
excited by his wife's absurd stories did not pre
vent him from producing a MS. which, delivered
to the copyists sheet by sheet as he completed
it, furnished the text of the Orchestral Parts
from which the Overture was played, without
farther correction, and without rehearsal. But,
he had not always time to carry out this process
of mental elaboration so completely. Though he
made no preliminary Sketches of his Composi
tions, he not unfrequently introduced considerable
changes into the finished copy. Some curious
instances of such pentimenti may be found in the
autograph Score of the Zauberflote, in the Andr£
collection at Offenbach. Not only are there
changes in the Overture ; but in the Duet for
Pamina and Papageno, in the First Act, the
position of the bars has been altered from be
ginning to end, in order to remedy an oversight
in the rhythm, which caused the last note of the
last vocal phrase to fall in the middle of a bar
instead of at the beginning. Again, the Score of
the Pianoforte Concerto in C minor (K. 491), now
in the possession of Mr. Otto Goldschrnidt, abounds
with afterthoughts, many of which are of great
importance : yet this MS. cannot be fairly called
a Sketch, since the pentimenti are strictly con
fined to the Solo Part, the orchestral portions of
the work remaining untouched, throughout.
Strange to say, the work in which we should
most confidently have expected to find traces of
reconsideration is singularly free from them. So
far as it goes, the original MS. (Urschrift) of the
' Requiem ' is a finished outline, written with so
fixed an intention, that it needed only the filling
in of the missing details, in order to make it per
fect — a circumstance for which Siissmayer must >
have felt intensely thankful, if we may believe
that no other records were left for his guidance.
A more remarkable contrast than that pre
sented by these firm outlines to the rough
memoranda of the Composer who next claims
our attention, it would be impossible to conceive.
Beethoven's method of working differed, not only
from Mozart's, but from that of all other known
men of genius ; and that so widely, that, if we ~
are to accept the canon laid down by the author
of ' Modern Painters ' at all, it can only be on
condition that we regard him as the exception
necessary to prove the rule. His greatest works
sprang, almost invariably, from germs of such
apparent insignificance, that, were we unable to
identify their after-growth, we should leave
them unnoticed among the host of barely legible
memoranda by which they were surrounded.
Happily, it was not his habit to destroy such
memoranda, after they had fulfilled their office.
He left behind him a whole library of Sketch
books, the value of which is now fully recognised,
and, thanks to the unremitting industry of Notte-
bohm and Thay er, not likely to be forgotten. Of the
three specimens now in the British Museum, one
is a mere fragment, and another, of comparatively
triflingiuterest; but the third (Add. MSS. 29,801),
SKETCHES.
ton tains some extremely valuable sketched me
moranda, made during the progress of the Music
for 'The Kuins of Athens,' 'Adelaida,' the
little Sonata in G minor (Op. 49, No. i), and
numerous other works, including a complete
copy of the ' Sonatina per il Mandolino ' already
printed at p. 205 of our second volume. More
interesting still are some of the Sketch-books in
the Royal Library at Berlin. From one of these,
written between the years 1802-4, an^ carefully
analysed by Nottebohm,1 we extract a series of
records connected with the Sonata in C major,
Op. 53, dedicated to Count Waldstein — a work so
generally known, that our readers can scarcely
fail to take an interest in the history of its birth,
infancy, and development to maturity. The first
Sketch, at page 120, dashes into the Subject of
the opening Allegro, by aid of a few prefatorial
bars which go far to induce our belief in some
still earlier memorandum.
•5 SpBZ3ZSi_3Z:
— "^'"^""=1 rr^i — Si =T"
f- L • • •! •
^ ^ r*
— jg *g ^ ^ —
-$***
^^=s^-»-J^-J3
At page 122 follows the first idea of the Modu
lation which introduces the Second Subject.
The Second Subject itself first appears at p. 1 23,
in C ; and in a form far inferior to that in
which it makes its first entrance, in E, in the
finished Sonata.
1
1 'Bin Skizzenbuch von Beethoven ausdem Jahrel?03,' etc. B. &H.
«?0. This was preceded by an earlier one, containing the 2nd
Symphony and other works, and published in 1865.
VOL. III. PT. 5.
SKETCHES.
529
— s
hr-«—
-p—
. -1 i? '
L(- — t— 1
t=fc&
-i :
The close of the First Part is suggested on
p. 122.
—
-f-
»r-
^ST-
-U
Hj
On p. 123 we find a Sketch for the opening of
the Second Part —
^^^
and, on p. 131, the close of the Movement.
^=
-
- -
f
-t="'P-
f-
r-
i-
: H
• (r
- 1
•
i —
± I
1
-
f- • 1
I
• 1
i r ' r
i
i - '
Alternating with these memoranda, the vol
ume presents some intensely interesting Sketches
for an Andante, the first suggestion for which
appears at p. 12.1, in E major.
Andante.
Immediately afterwards, this first idea reap
pears, in a modified form, and in combination
with a phrase justly dear to all of us.
M m
530
SKETCHES.
The Key is afterwards changed, and the idea
assumes a familiar form —
The Movement now gradually developes into
the well-known Andante in F, known as Op. 35,
though, as Ries tells us, originally included in
the plan of the Sonata we are studying : —
Still, this passage does not satisfy the Com
poser, who tries it over and over again ; always,
however, retaining the lovely Modulation to the
key of Db, and gradually bringing it into the
form in which it was eventually printed.
We next find a suggestion for the Episode inBb,
>,b ff|f-»,. |*LJ-'7j
j^iii^^^ -^
f=
and, lastly, the germ of the Coda.
8va ....
^*Vr^ !3z p I 3c=p
^^^r^^^^g
q
r
U
The alternation of these Sketches with those
for the first and last Movements of the Sonata,
coupled with the absence of all trace of a design
for the intermediate Movement which now forms
part of it, sufficiently corroborates Ries's assertion
that the publication of the 'Andante in F,' in a
separate form, was an afterthought ; while the
eminent fitness of this beautiful Movement for
the position it was originally intended to fill,
tempts us to regret that the ' Waldstein Sonata '
should ever have been given to the world without
it. But the whole work suffered changes of the
SKETCHES.
most momentous character. The Rondo was ori
ginally sketched in Triple Time, though that
idea was soon abandoned, in favour of one which,
after several trials, more clearly foreshadowed
the present Movement ; not, however, without
long-continued hesitation between a plain and a
syncopated form of the principal Subject.
Page 139.
-+*-*-
-• —
7-p—
Z£
,—JL^
»—
-f^-T-
r- * '
-H
1 u
1 — •
3
i
u4U_~
^— IP-
-M
Page 139.
t
-P-JL
The two following Sketches for the middle
section of the Movement, are chiefly remarkable
for the change suggested in the second memor
andum.
Page 136.
Page 141.
The passage of Triplets, which afterwards
forms so important a feature of the Movement,
is first suggested at p. 137, and its future de
velopment indicated by the word Triolen on p.
1 39-
Page 137.
Page 139.
8m -
=£3C
Triolen
Then follows the introduction of a new idea :
8va .--...
Finally, on p. 138, we find the first rough draft
of the Prestissimo with which the work concludes
— or, rather, the embryo which afterwards de
veloped itself into that fiery peroration.
SKETCHES.
SKETCHES.
531
Presto,
_*— «•-
8va
•-*-#*-*
—I Sp i~
irSz
a
*
— »i
e
E
P "1 F"
— b — H — p~
C' —
1
! J
^^
i — w—
The Sonata, in its present form, consisting of
the Allegro, and the Rondo, with a short ' Intro-
duzione' — of which no Sketch has as yet been
found — interposed between them, was published,
as Op. 53, in May 1805, and the Andante, in a
separate form, as Op. 35, in May 1806. The
Sketches belong, in all probability, to the year
1803 : and the volume which contains them is
even richer in records of the ' Eroica Symphony';
besides furnishing valuable memoranda for the
treatment of the First Act of ' Fidelio,' the
Pianoforte Concerto in G major, the Sym
phony in C minor, and other works of less im
portance. The Sketches for the Eroica Sym
phony exceed in interest almost all the others
we possess ; but we have thought it better to
illustrate our subject by those for the Sonata,
because, being both less voluminous, and more
easily compared with the finished work, these
'vestiges of creation' exhibit the peculiar phase
of productive power we are now studying in a
more generally intelligible form than any others
that we could have selected, and, while forcibly
reminding us of the process carried out by Raf-
faelle, in designing the ' Bella Giardiniera,' very
clearly exemplify the points in which Beethoven's
plan of action diverged from that pursued by
other Classical Composers.
Schubert's method of working differed entirely
both from Mozart's, and Beethoven's. He neither
prepared a perfect mental copy, like the former ;
nor worked out his ideas, as did the latter, from
a primordial germ ; but wrote almost always
on the spur of the moment, committing to paper,
as fast as his pen could trace them, the ideas which
presented themselves to his mind at the instant of
composition — proceeding, in fact, as ordinary men
do when they sit down to write a letter. This
being the case — and there is ample proof of it —
we are not surprised to find that he was no
Sketch er, though we cannot but regard with
astonishment the remarkable freedom of his
Scores from evidences of afterthought. It is
true, we do sometimes find important modifica
tions of the first idea. There is an autograph
copy of ' Der Erlkonig ' in existence — probably
an early one— in which the Accompaniment is
treated in Quavers, in place of Triplets.1 Im
portant changes have been discovered in the Score
of the Mass in Ab.2 Others are found in the
Symphony in C major, No. 10 ; the original MS.
of which gives proof, in many places, of notable
changes of intention. A singularly happy im
provement is effected in the opening Theme, for
the Horns, by the alteration of a single note.
The Subject of the Allegro is far more extensively
changed; and scratched through with the pen,
at every recurrence, for the introduction of the
later modification. New bars — and very beau
tiful ones — have been added to the Scherzo ; and
there is more or less change in the Adagio.
But, these cases are far from common. As a
general rule, he committed his ideas to paper
under the influence of uncontrollable inspiration,
and then cast his work aside, to make room for
newer manifestations of creative power. By far
the greater number of his MSS. remain, un
touched, exactly in the condition in which they
first saw the light : monuments of the certainty
with which true genius realises the perfect em
bodiment of its sublime conceptions. In no case
is this certainty more forcibly expressed than in
the unfinished Score of the Symphony in E, No. 7,
now in the possession of the Editor of this Dic
tionary.3 Schubert began to write this, with the
evident determination to complete a great work
on the spot. At first, he filled in every detail ;
employing, for the expression of his ideas, the
resources of an Orchestra consisting of 2 Violins,
Viola, 2 Flutes, 2 Oboes, 2 Clarinets in A, 2
Bassoons, 2 Horns in E, 2 Horns in G, 3 Trom
bones, 2 Trumpets in E, Drums in E, B, Violon
cello, and Contra-Basso. This portion of the
Symphony opens thus —
Adagio.
Clar. e Fajr.
After a farther development, of 30 bars dura
tion, the Adagio breaks into an Allegro in E
major : —
Vide page 324. 2 vide page 3366.
a Vide pages 334, 835, and 4376.
Mm2
532
SKETCHES.
SKETCHES.
J'.assu
Basso
etc.
During the 69 bars which follow, the Move
ment is fully scored ; but, from this point, either
through failure of time, or, more probably, in
rebellion against the mechanical restraint im
posed upon thoughts which flowed faster than
the pen could write them down, Schubert indi
cates the leading thread only of his idea, by
means of a few notes, allotted sometimes to one
Instrument, and sometimes to another, but always
with a firmness of intention which conclusively
proves that the entire Score was present to his
mind, throughout. Thus, at the 8£th bar of the
Movement, a few notes for the First Violin in
troduce the Second Subject, of which the First
Clarinet part only is written in full, with here
and there a note or two for the Violin, not simply
suggested, but resolutely inserted in the proper
place.
Clap.
etc.
In this manner the Movement is carried on
through a farther period of 271 bars — in all 374
— never with less clear indications than these,
and generally with much fuller ones, to its
conclusion in the original key. Then follows an
Andante in A major, on the following Subject,
of which the First Violin part only appears in
the MS.
, Andante.
Of this, nine bars only are fully scored, soon
after the statement of the leading Subject, and
six more a little farther on : but the indications
are perfectly clear throughout.
The Scherzo, in C major, also begins with the
First Violin part only, no part of it being com
pletely scored : —
Allegro.
=1=1=1-
-j 1
d-
|
: — — — i
J
•
_-' • -•- m Tj
i- etc.
The Trio opens with a passage for Oboes, Bas
soons, and Viole divisi ; and it is possible that
some portions of it may have been intended to
remain as they stand in the MS., with no addi
tional Instrumentation : —
2 Oboi
- • — — I—
<& • ' &^^J—t^~
J
• •
fj •
"^
• • •
H
• A *
-•"-^ ^~ — A
I
' *
C2
t
-»-«-•-
r^ «
:
•jn »-, • '_
L :
f
J J
1 ^
i i 1
f
etc.
0
''**' /
The last Movement begins, in like manner,
with a very meagre outline: but, a large pro
portion of the First Violin part is completely
filled in ; and, when a subsidiary Subject makes
its appearance, the Wind Instruments never fail
to indicate the special mode of treatment intended
for it.
Viol. imo P
r. i - a-
arr
1 M- f*
J i r*jr '' I * =r«
1 •
~m 4-
* * ntts
— ft
etc.
Second Subject
&» Q^
^ t^i
etc.
We have said enough to show that, though
describable in general terms as ' a Sketch,' this
remarkable MS. is not one in reality. It is
SKETCHES.
rather what a Painter would call an tbaiiche : an
outline, indicating the contours of a finished
design with a touch so firm, that not one note
•would have needed alteration, during the process
of filling in the later details, had the Composer
so far departed from his usual custom as to com
plete a MS. once laid aside, and forgotten. In
truth, it exactly represents a canvas, fully pre
pared to receive the future painting ; and may,
therefore, be fairly accepted as evidence that
Schubert was not addicted to the practice of
sketching, a conclusion which is strengthened
by the Score of the unfinished Symphony in
B minor, No. 8, the first two Movements of which
are completely finished, while, of the remainder,
nine bars only were ever committed to writing.
Mendelssohn, on the other hand, sketched
freely ; though, less for the purpose of registering
stray thoughts for future use, than for the sake
of the Sketches themselves. Thus, we constantly
find him heading a letter with some little pas
sage, through the medium of which he strove to
express the feelings of the moment more perfectly
than he could have done in words. Still, cases
were not wanting, in which he turned the record
of some momentary impression to splendid sub
sequent account. A notable instance of this is
afforded by the germ of the Overture to 'The
Isles of Fingal,' which first appears in a letter to
his family, dated ' Auf einer Hebride, den 7
August, 1829'; and beginning 'To show you
how more than ordinarily pleasing I have found
the Hebrides, the following has just suggested
itself to me.' A facsimile of this interesting
memorandum will be found in 'The Mendelssohn
Family," i. 208. A more extended Sketch for
two of the Movements of a Symphony in C has
been printed in our own vol. ii. p. 305.
We need not quote the memoranda of later
writers. We have, indeed, purposely illustrated
the subject by aid of examples left us by the
greatest of the Great Masters only. And, in
contrasting the methods pursued by these great
geniuses, we find it no easy task to arrive at a
just conclusion with regard to their comparative
value. When carefully analysed, the methods of
Mozart and Beethoven will be found to bear a
closer analogy to each other than we should, at
first sight, feel inclined to suppose. Mozart was
a mental sketcher ; Beethoven, a material one.
The former carried on, in his brain, the process
which the latter worked out upon paper — et voila
tout. Whether or not the mental embryo was as
simple in its origin as the written one, we cannot
tell. Probably not. Mozart tells us, that, when
he was in a fitting mood for composition, he heard
the conceptions which presented themselves to his
mind as distinctly as if they had been played by a
full Orchestra. But, we know that he gradually
brought them to perfection, afterwards : and he
himself implied as much, when he said, that, after
all, the real performance of the finished work was
the best. Beethoven heard his thoughts, also,
with the mental ear, even after the material organ
had failed to perform its office; and it would be
unsafe to assume, that, because he was more
SIMONE BOCCANEGRA.
533
careful than Mozart to record his conceptions
in writing, their development was really more
gradual. If Mozart's mental Sketches could be
collected, it is quite possible that they might
outnumber Beethoven's written ones. And the
same with pentimenti. It matters nothing, when
the Composer has determined on a change, whether
he puts it on paper at once or not. Two ex
amples will illustrate our meaning, the more
forcibly because in neither case is the composi
tion affected by the pentimento. I. In the ori
ginal autograph of Mozart's ' Phantasia ' in C
minor (Kochel no. 475), now in the collection of
Mr. Julian Marshall, three flats were, as usual,
placed at the signature, in the first instance ;
but Mozart afterwards erased them, and intro
duced each flat, where it was needed, as an
Accidental. 2. Among the Handel MSS. at
Buckingham Palace is a volume labelled 'So
natas,' which contains two pages of the Harpsi
chord Suite in E minor, in Alia breve time, with
the three B's which begin the subject written as
Minims, instead of Crotchets, and the following
passage as Quavers. But Schubert only very
rarely made such changes as these. He made
no sketch either mental or written. The ideas
rushed into the world, in the fullest form of de
velopment they were fated to attain. One's first
impulse is, to pronounce this the highest mani
festation of creative genius. Yet, is it the most
natural ? Surely not. It is true, we recognise,
in the material Creation, the expression of a pre
conceived Idea, infinitely perfect in all its parts,
and infinitely consistent in its unbroken unity
and ineffable completeness : but, each individual
manifestation of that Idea attains perfection,
under our very eyes, by slow development from a
primordial germ, to all outward appearance more
simple in its construction than the slightest of
Beethoven's Sketches. And, if the mortal frame
of every man who walks the earth can be proved
to have originated in a single nucleated cell, we
surely cannot wonder that the 'Pastoral Sym
phony' was developed from a few notes scratched
upon a sheet of music-paper. [W.S.R.]
SILVANA : also called « Silvana das Wald
madchen,' or ' das stumme Waldmadchen' — the
dumb Wood-maiden. A romantic opera in 3 acts ;
words by F. K. Hiemer, music by Weber ; his
6th dramatic work, completed Feb. 23, 1810;
produced at Frankfort, Sept. 16, 1810. It is
probably founded to some extent on his early
opera 'Das Waldmadchen' (1800), afterwards
burnt; and was to a small extent employed in
'Abu Hassan ' and ' Freischutz/ The overture was
used by Weber as the prelude to his music for the
wedding of Prince John of Saxony ; and he wrote
7 variations for clarinet and PF^ for H. Barmann,
on an air from it, ' Waruin musst' ich.' [G.j
SIMONE BOCCANEGRA. An opera in 3
acts, with Prologue ; libretto by Piave, music by
Verdi. Produced at the Fenice theatre, Venice,
March 12, 1857; remodelled and rescored, with
a fresh libretto by Boito, and reproduced at La
Scala, Milan, March 24, 1881. [G.].
534
SINICO.
SINICO. An Italian family of musicians, I.
FRANCESCO, born at Trieste, Dec. 12, 1810, began
as an amateur, but in 1843, after various efforts,
became Maestro di capella to the Jesuits of that
city, and shortly afterwards induced the author
ities to found a singing school under his direction,
which from a humble beginning became an im
portant institution. He died, Aug. 18, 1865.
2. His younger brother, GIUSEPPE, also born at
Trieste, about 1812, a singer whom we hear of
at Oporto, Madrid, Florence, and Milan, and
who afterwards took to teaching. 3. A second
GIUSEPPE, son of Francesco, was born at Trieste,
Feb. 10, 1836 ; he began by assisting his father,
and published a ' Breve Metodo ' of singing, but
soon forsook this for composition, and in 1859
and 61 produced three operas in his native town.
4. A lady, who was first known as Mme. Sinico,
afterwards as Mme. Campobello, and whose
maiden name was Clarice Marini, made her de"but
in England, May 17, 1864, at Her Majesty's, as
Violetta. For many years she was engaged at
one or other of the London opera-houses, and
was remarkable for her efficient presentment of
smaller operatic parts, and her ability to play
principal characters at a moment's notice. She
had a nice high soprano voice. Her rtper-
toire included Donna Elvira, Susanna, Isabella,
Margaret of Valois, Adalgisa, Anne Page,
Elvira (Masaniello), Mathilde, Neris (Cherubini's
Mede'e), Papagena (Zauberflote), Annetta (Der
Freischiitz), Blonde (Seraglio), the Queen (Ham
let), Jane Seymour (Anna Bolena), etc. In 1879
she played at Her Majesty's, but of late has been
rarely seen in opera in London. She is well
known as an oratorio and concert singer ; in 1874
sang at the Handel Festival, and is also very
popular in the provinces. The above refers to
her performances in England, but she has also sung
at St. Petersburg, Copenhagen, and elsewhere.
She is pre-eminently a useful singer. On May 2,
1874, she married Mr. Henry McLean Martin, a
favourite baritone singer, known under his pro
fessional name of Campobello. [A.C.]
SIROE, RE DI PERSIA. An opera of
Metastasio's, remarkable for the number of times
it has been set : — Vinci (Venice, 1726); Handel
(London, Feb. 5, 1728); Wagenseil (Milan,
1730?); Bioni (Breslau, 1731); Hasse (Bologna,
1 733) 5 Vivaldi (Ancona, 1 738) ; J. Cocchi (Naples,
1750) ; Manna (Venice, 1 753) ; Lampugnani (Mi
lan, 1755); Perez (Lisbon, 1756); Piccinni
(Naples, 1759); Giardini (London, 1 764) ; Buroni
(Prague, 1764); Guglielmi (1765); Sarti (Turin,
1783); Ubaldi (Turin, 1810?)— are all named
by Clement as following one another in this curi
ous course, a course inconceivable at present,
though common in the i8th century. [G.]
SIVORI, ERNESTO CAMILLO, a great violinist,
born at Genoa, June 6, 1817, the day after his
mother had heard Paganini for the first time.
He began the violin at five, under Restano, and
continued it under Costa, until about the year
1823, when Paganini met with him, and was so
much struck with his talent, as not only to give
him lessons, but to compose six sonatas and a
SLIDE.
concertino for violin, guitar, tenor, and cello,
which they were accustomed to play together,
Paganini taking the guitar. This was sufficient
to launch the lad into Paganini's style. In 1827
he first reached Paris and then 1 England; re
turning to Genoa, where he studied harmony
seriously under Serra for several years without
public demonstration. He next traversed Italy,
beginning with Florence, in 1839 ; then in 1841
and 42 visited Prague, Vienna, Leipzig, Berlin,
Frankfort, Brussels, St. Petersburg and Moscow.
On Jan. 29, 1843, he made his rentrt, to Paris
with a movement from a concerto of his own, his
performance of which carried away his audience
and procured him a special medal. He also made
a vast impression in chamber-music. From Paris
he went to London, and played his concerto at the
Philharmonic, June 5, 1843, repeating it on the
1 9th (Spohr was in London at the same time) ;
returned in 1844, when Mendelssohn, Joachim,
Halle, Piatti, and Ernst were here also, and in
1845, when he assisted in the famous performances
of Beethoven's quartets at Mr. Alsager's house
[see ROUSSELOT, ii. 182 &], played at the Musical
Union on June 24, etc., etc. In 1846 he was
again here; on June 2 7 introduced Mendelssohn's
Concerto to England at the Philharmonic Concert,
and was solo violin at Julien's ' Concerts d'Ete.'
He then left for America, in which he remained
till 1850, travelling from the Northern States,
by Mexico and Panama, to Valparaiso, Rio,
Buenos Ayres, and Montevideo, and narrowly
escaping death by yellow fever. In 1850 he re
turned to Genoa, and shortly after lost nearly all
the money he had made in the new world by an
imprudent speculation. In 1851 he was again
in Great Britain, touring throughout the whole
country. In 1862 he scored one more success in
Paris in the B minor Concerto of Paganini. In
1864 he revisited London, and appeared at the
Musical Union and elsewhere. Since then his
life does not appear to have exhibited anything
remarkable.
As a man he was always liked — ' little, good-
tempered, warm-hearted, intelligent, Camillo
Sivori,' is the description of him of an English
journalist. He was the only direct pupil of
Paganini, and his playing was that of a vir
tuoso of the Paganini school, with a prodigious
command of difficulties, especially of double-stop
ping, second only to his master. His tone was
silvery and clear, but rather thin. His style —
judged by a classical standard — was cold and
affected, and had little real feeling. It is strange
that the introduction of Mendelssohn's Concerto
into this country should have fallen to an artist
so little able to do justice to its merits. Sivori's
works for the violin include 2 concertos, in Eb and
A; a fantaisie caprice in E; 3 sets of variations;
4 fantaisies on operas, etc., etc. They are rich
in display, but poor as music, and were hardly
ever played by any one but the composer. [G-.]
SLIDE (Ger. Schleifer ; FT. Couti), an orna
ment frequently met with in both vocal and in
strumental music, although its English name
l Moscheles's Diary, i. 198.
SLIDE.
SLIDE.
535
has fallen into disuse. It consists of a rapid dia
tonic progression of three notes, either ascending
or descending, of which the principal note, or
note to be ornamented, is the third, and the other
two are grace-notes, and are either written of
small size (Ex. I), or, in old music, indicated by
an oblique line drawn towards the principal note
from the note preceding (Ex. 2).
1. BEETHOVEN, Bagatelle, Op. 119, No. 5.
Written. & _ tr
Played.
fa-£rfB^
CHOPIN, Andante Spianato, Op. 22.
Written. -^~~ * ^^
tf -*- -
*-•-•
T^-T — l^L^L-l— ii
-it— L — C--
^=) 1
fe£-
1
•3
^^ A -
-g r .g i-
Sferzn
Played. ^~ 5
^tA-i±ifc£
^-^ ,
§3= n
2. Written.
o
Played.
y .^'P (• ^. i
! * • I*
• T 1 • m 11
L v r-r-^r-
r cJ"
-fe r^
Another method of indicating it is by means
of a direct (W) placed upon the degree of the
stave on which the slide is to commence, and
having its right extremity prolonged so as to ex
tend to the position of the principal note (Ex. 3).
The short notes of the slide are always executed
•within the value of the principal note, and not
before it, and any note which may accompany it
must fall together with the first note, as in Ex. 3.
The accent is on the principal note.
3. BACH, Suite Francaise, No. 3.
Written.
When a note followed by another, one degree
above or below it, is ornamented by a NACH
SCHLAG of two notes [vol. ii. p. 441, Ex. 8], the
small notes present exactly the appearance of a
slide to the second large note, and thus a misappre
hension as to the proper rendering might arise.
For according to the invariable rule of all grace-
notes, the small notes of the Nachschlag would be
executed during the latter portion of the value of
the first large note (Ex. 4), but those of the slide
not until the commencement of the second (Ex. 5).
Properly, a slur should be introduced to connect
the grace-notes with their own principal note, as
in the examples ; this prevents the possibility of
mistake, but in the absence of the slur — and it is
frequently omitted — the performer must be guided
by his own judgment.
4. Nachschlag.
Written. ...
5. Slide.
— & - &
—jf- . ±-g-m _ J-s
B— *-
-Ty-* —
-m •-*-
— H
ifh — r — ~^~F — ^~* —
5?E
— •(-*•
^~ ==f
-H
Played,
Sometimes the first note of a slide is sustained
for the duration of the whole. In old music this
was indicated by writing the extreme notes o£
the slide on a single stem, and drawing an oblique
line between them, either upwards or down
wards, according to the direction of the slide
(Ex. 6). In modern music the same thing is
expressed (though not very accurately) by means
of a tie (Ex. 7).
7. SCHUBERT, ' Momens Musicals,' No. 3.
Written.
Slides of greater extent than three notes are
not unfrequent ; groups of three notes leading to
a principal note are often met with (Ex. 8), and
slides of four and even more notes occasionally
(Ex. 9). This extended slide is sometimes called
Tirade or Tirata (from tirare to draw, or to
shoot). E. W. Wolf, in his ' Musikalische Un-
terricht* (Dresden, 1788), calls such passages
'sky-rockets.'
8.
Written. ^A^.
-^..n T
MEYERBEER, 'Roberto.'
-f-f-?if tf y
-K
rfr^
— ^ — 1 1^_
J
9. HUMMEL, 'Pianoforte-School.'
Written.
t
536
SLIDE.
Besides the above, a more complicated kind of
slide is mentioned by Emanuel Bach and others,
called the dotted slide, in which the first grace-
note received the addition of a dot. Its execu
tion however varies so considerably — as is proved
by the two examples by Emanuel Bach, selected
from a variety of others (Ex. 10) — that the sign
has never met with general acceptance, although
the ornament itself, written out in notes of
ordinary size, is of constant occurrence in the
works of the great masters (Ex. u).
10. Written.
•3
BEETHOVEN, 'Sonata Pathgtique.'
SLIDE (Fr. Coulisse; Ger. Zugstange, Stim-
Stiick ; It. a tirarsi). A. contrivance applied at a
very early date to instruments of the trumpet
and trombone family, for lengthening and short
ening the sounding tube, and thus filling the
gaps between the fundamental note and its
successive harmonics. Two slide-trombones, es
sentially identical with the modern pattern, are
to be seen, one in the Museo Borbonico at Naples,
the other in the Queen's collection at Windsor.
Both were found at Pompeii. [TROMBONE.] In
the trombone the mouthpiece, upper joints, and
bell of the instrument are held to the mouth of
the player by means of the left, while the slide
is held and adjusted by means of the right hand
and arm. In the G bass trombone, the length of
a man's arm not being sufficient to reach the
lower slide positions, a jointed handle is fixed to
the cross-bar of the slide by way of prolongation.
In the trumpet, the extent of travel of the slide
being far less, and that instrument being held in
the right hand, the slide is placed between the
bell and the upper part of the tube, and drawn
to its closed position by a spiral spring, or an
elastic ligature of caoutchouc. It is drawn out
to the required length by the fore and middle
fingers, acting in opposition to the thumb.
A double slide-action on the principle of the
trombone has been very ingeniously applied to
the French Horn by Mr. Ford. It is actuated
SLUR.
by a key somewhat resembling the usual rotatory
valve apparatus. It is patented, and a model
has been deposited in the Museum of Patents at
South Kensington. It of course has the in
estimable advantage which causes the slide
trumpet and trombone to excel all other wind
instruments in accuracy of intonation — that
namely of producing the notes by ear and not by
an unalterable mechanism ; but it has never
been adopted by musicians. [W.H.S.]
SLOPER, E. H. LINDSAY, born in London
June 14, 1826, was taught the rpianoforte by
Moscheles for some years. In 1840 he went to
Frankfort and continued his studies under Aloys
Schmitt. He next proceeded to Heidelberg, and
studied harmony and counterpoint under Carl
Vollweiler. In 1841 he went to Paris and
pursued the study of composition under Boisselot.
He remained there for five years and gained great
reputation, both as composer and performer. He
returned to London in 1846 and made a successful
appearance at a matinee of the Musical Union.
He has since devoted himself principally to
teaching, but appears occasionally at public con
certs. His compositions are chiefly for the piano
forte, but he has also produced some songs and
other vocal music, which have had a favourable
reception. [W.H.H.]
SLOW MOVEMENT, (i) A generic term
for all pieces in slow time, whether separate, or
forming part of a larger work. (2) A name
specially applied to such pieces in slow time
when they occur in a sonata (or work in sonata-
form). When the sonata contains three or more
movements, the slow movement may be the
second, third, or fourth in the sonata, provided
that there is a ' first movement ' at the beginning
and a finale at the close. In sonatas of only two
movements, the slow movement may be either
the first, as in Beethoven's Pianoforte Sonata
Op. 49, No. I, or the second, as in his Sonata
Op. 90. The right of any movement to this title
must depend rather on its character than its
time indication, for many movements marked
Allegretto are strictly slow movements. [See
SONATA.] [J.A.F.M.]
SLUR. This word, taken in its original and
widest sense, signifies an effect of phrasing which
is more commonly expressed by the Italian term
legato, i. e. connected. The sign of the slur is
a curved line (Ger. Schleifbogen ; Fr. Liaison)
drawn over or under a group of notes, and the
notes included within its limits are said to be
slurred, and are performed with smoothness, if
on a stringed instrument, by a single stroke of
the bow, or in singing, on a single syllable.
[See LEGATO, vol. ii. p. 112.] But although this
was originally the meaning of the word, it is now
used in a more restricted sense, to denote a
special phrasing effect, in which the last of the
notes comprised within the curved line is short
ened, and a considerable stress laid on the first.
This effect has already been fully described in
the article PHRASING [vol. ii. p. 707.] In vocal
music the slur is employed to indicate the use of
SLUR.
PORTAMENTO (see the word), and it is also very
generally placed over two or more notes which
are sung to a single syllable. In this case how
ever the sign is superfluous, since if the passage
consists of quavers or shorter notes, the connec
tion can be shown by writing them in groups
instead of separate [see QUAVER, p. 60], while even
if the notes are crotchets, the fact of there being
but a single syllable sufficiently indicates the
legato. Moreover an effect analogous to the slur
in instrumental music, whereby the second of
two notes is curtailed and weakened, is perfectly
possible in singing, and may very probably have
been intended by the earlier composers where
the sign of the slur is employed. This view is
insisted upon by Mendelssohn, who in a letter
to Mr. G. A. Macfarren * strongly objects to the
engravers of his edition of 'Israel in Egypt'
placing the slur over two quavers or semi-quavers
which are to be sung to one word.
When the slur is used in combination with a
series of dots, thus J «N «l , it indicates the effect
called mezzo staccato, in which the notes are
made of longer duration than if marked with the
staccato-sign only, being sustained for nearly
their full value, and separated by a very brief
interval of silence. [See also STACCATO.] [F.T.]
SMART, SIR GEORGE THOMAS, Knight, born
May 10, 1776, son of George Smart, music seller
(tirst in Argyll Street and afterwards at 331
Oxford Street) and double-bass player, received
his early musical education as a chorister of the
Chapel Royal under Dr. Ayrton. He learned
organ-playing from Dr. Dupuis and composition
from Dr. Arnold. On quitting the choir in 1791
he obtained the appointment of organist of St.
James's Chapel, Hampstead Road, and was also
engaged as a violinist at Salomon's concerts. At
a rehearsal of a symphony of Haydn's for one of
those concerts the drummer was absent, and
Haydn, who was at the harpsichord, inquired if
any one present could play the drums. Young
Smart volunteered, but from inexperience was
not very successful, whereupon the great com
poser, ascending the orchestra, gave him a prac
tical lesson in the art of drumming. About the
same time he commenced practice as a teacher
of the harpsichord and singing. He soon showed
an aptitude for conducting musical performances.
In 1811, having successfully conducted some
concerts in Dublin, he was knighted by the Lord
Lieutenant. In 1813 he was chosen one of the
original members of the Philharmonic Society,
and between that date and 1844 conducted 49 of
its concerts. From 1813 to 1825 he conducted
the Lenten oratorios at one or other of the patent
theatres, at one of which in 1814 he introduced
Beethoven's ' Mount of Olives ' to the English
public. In 1818 he directed the City concerts
established by the late Baron (then Mr.) Heath.
On April i, 1822, he was appointed one of the
organists of the Chapel Royal in the room of
Charles Knyvett, deceased. In 1824 he accom-
Goethe and Mendelssohn. 2nd ed. p. 77.
SMART.
537
panied Charles Kemble to Germany to engage
Weber to compose an opera for Covent Garden,
and when Weber came to England in 1826 to
bring out his ' Oberou ' he was the guest of Sir
George Smart, in whose house he died on June 5.
It was mainly by the exertions of Sir George
Smart and Sir Julius Benedict that the statue of
Weber at Dresden was erected, the greater part
of the subscriptions having been collected in
England. In 1836 Sir George introduced Men
delssohn's ' St. Paul ' to England at the Liverpool
Festival. On the death of Attwood in 1838 he
was appointed one of the composers to the Chapel
Royal. To a careful musicianship he added an
administrative ability which eminently qualified
him for the conductorship of musical festivals
and other performances on a large scale, and his
services were for many years in request on such
occasions all over the country. He conducted
festivals at Liverpool in 1823, 1827, 1830, 1833,
and 1836; Norwich, 1824, 1827, 1830, and 1833;
Bath, 1824; Newcastle- upon-Tyne, 1824 and
1842; Edinburgh, 1824; Bury St. Edmund's,
1828; Dublin and Derby, 1831; Cambridge,
1833 and 1835; Westminster Abbey, 1834; Hull,
1834 and 1840 ; and Exeter Hall and Manchester,
1 836. He was long resorted to by singers desirous
of acquiring the traditional manner of singing
Handel's songs, which he had been taught by his
father, who had seen Handel conduct his oratorios :
among the many he so instructed were Sontag
and Jenny Lind. He gave lessons in singing
until he was past 80. He edited Orlando Gib
bon s's Madrigals for the Musical Antiquarian
Society, and the ' Dettingen Te Deum ' for the
Handel Society. He took an active part in pro
curing the foundation of the Mendelssohn Scho
larship. His compositions consist of anthems,
chants, Kyries, psalm tunes, and glees. In 1863
he published a collection of his anthems and
another of his glees and canons. Two of his
glees, 'The Squirrel' and 'The Butterfly's Ball,'
were very popular He died at his house in
Bedford Square, Feb. 23, 1867.
His brother, HENRY, born in 1778, began his
musical education at an early age, and studied
the violin under Wilhelm Cramer, in which he
made such progress that when only 14 he was
engaged at the Opera, the Concert of Ancient
Music, and the Academy of Ancient Music. He
was engaged as leader of the band at the Lyceum
on its being opened as an English Opera House
in 1809, and continued so for several seasons.
He was leader at the present Drury Lane Theatre
from its opening in 1812 until 1821. On June
12, 1819, the band presented him with a silver
cup as a token of their regard. He was leader
of the Lenten oratorios from the time they came
under the management of his brother, Sir George,
in 1813, and a member of the Philharmonic
Society's orchestra, which he occasionally led.
In 1820 he established a manufactory of piano
fortes of a peculiar construction, and on July 22,
1823, obtained a patent for improvements in the
construction of pianofortes. He went to Dublin
to superintend the debftt of his pupil, Miss
533
SMART.
Goward (now Mrs. Keeley), where lie was at
tacked by typhus fever, and died, Nov. 23, 1823.
His son
HENKT SMART, a prominent member of the
modern English School, was born in London
Oct. 26, 1813, and after declining a commis
sion in the Indian army, was articled to a
solicitor, but quitted law for music, for which
he had extraordinary natural faculties, and which
he studied principally under W. H. Kearns,
though to a great extent self-taught. In 1831
he became organist of the parish church of
Blackburn, Lancashire, which he resigned in
1836. While at Blackburn he composed his first
important work, an anthem for the tercentenary
of the Reformation, in 1835. In 1836 he settled
in London as organist to St. Philip's Church. In
1 844 he was appointed to the organ of St. Luke's,
Old Street, where he remained until 1864, when
he was chosen organist of St. Pancras. He was
an excellent organ-player, specially happy as an
accompanist in the service, a splendid extern-
poriser, and a voluminous and admirable com
poser for the instrument. But his compositions
were by no means confined to the organ. In
1855 an opera from his pen, 'Bertha, or, The
Gnome of the Hartzburg,' was successfully pro
duced at the Haymavket. In 1 864 he composed
his cantata, 'The Bride of Dunkerron' (his
best work), expressly for the Birmingham Festi
val. He produced two cantatas, 'King Rene's
Daughter' (words by Enoch), 1871, and 'The
Fishermaidens,' both for female voices. An
opera on the subject of 'The Surrender of Calais,'
the libretto by Planchd, originally intended for
Mendelssohn, was put into his hands by Messrs.
Chappell, about 1852, but though considerable
progress was made with it, it was never completed.
A sacred cantata, 'Jacob' — words compiled by
Mr. McCaul — was written for the Glasgow
Festival, produced Nov. 10, 1873, and repeated
Nov. 7, 1874; and two large anthems for solos,
chorus, and organ were written for the Festi
vals of the London Choral Choirs Association at
St. Paul's in 1876 and 1878—' Sing to the Lord,'
and 'Lord thou hast been our refuge.' For
many years past Mr. Smart's sight had been
failing, and soon after 1864 he became too blind
to write. All his compositions after that date
therefore were committed to paper — like those
of another great ornament of the English School,
Mr. Macfarren — through the truly disheartening
process of dictation.
It is as a composer of part-songs and a writer
for the organ that Henry Smart will be known
to the future. His earlier part-songs, 'The Shep
herd's Farewell,' 'The Waves' Reproof (worthy
of Mendelssohn), 'Ave Maria,' are lovely, and
will long be sung ; and his organ pieces (many
of them published in the Organist's Quarterly
Journal) are full of charming melody and effec
tive combinations. As was his music so was
the man — not original, but highly interesting,
and always full of life and vigour. He was a
very accomplished mechanic, and had he taken
up engineering instead of music, would no doubt
SMITH.
have been successful. As a designer of organs
he was often employed, and those at Leeds and
Glasgow may be named as specimens of his
powers in this line. He edited Handel's 13
Italian duets and ^ trios for the Handel Society.
His health had for several years been very bad,
and cancer on the liver gave him excruciating
agony. In June 1879 *^e Government granted
him a pension of £100 a year in acknowledg
ment of his services in the cause of music, but
he did not live to enjoy it, dying July 6, 1879.
His last composition was a Postlude in Eb for
the organ, finished very shortly before the end.
His life has been written by his friend Dr.
Spark (Reeves, 1881), and the book will always
be interesting, though it might perhaps have
been more usefully arranged, and more accurately
printed.
CHARLES FREDERICK, a younger brother of Sir
George Smart, was brought up as a chorister at the
Chapel Royal,and afterwards became a double-bass
player in all the principal orchestras. [W.H.H.]
SMETANA, FRIEDRICH, born March 2, 1824,
at Leitomischl in Bohemia, between Olmu'tz and
Prague, was a pupil of Proksch at Prague, and
afterwards, for a short time, of Liszt, under whose
tuition he became a remarkable pianist. He then
opened a musical school of his own at Prague
and married Katharina Kolar. In 1856 he took
the post of conductor to the Philharmonic Society
at Gothenburg in Sweden, where he lost his wife
in 1860. In 1866 he became conductor to the
National Theatre of Prague. He is eminently a
Bohemian composer, and the list of his operas in
that language is large — ' Married for money ' ;
' The Brandenburger in Bohemia ' ; ' Dalibor ' ;
'Two widows'; ' The Kiss.' Also a symphonic
poem, entitled ' Mein Vaterland,' in 3 sections—
' Vysehrad ' (the Visegrad fortress), 'Vltava' (the
Moldau), and ' Libussa.' The first two of these,
very picturesque and striking pieces, were per
formed at the Crystal Palace on Nov. n, 1882,
and March 5, 1881, respectively. Smetana has
also published a quartet, many dances, and
other pianoforte pieces, etc. In 1874 ne was
compelled to give up the National Opera-house
on account of his deafness, which has since in
creased so far as to deprive him of all power
of hearing. But he still composes. One of his
claims to notice is that he was the teacher of
Dvorsha"k.
A medallion with an inscription in his honour
was recently affixed to the house in which Smet
ana was born, on which occasion there were great
festivities, and he was presented with the freedom
of the town. [G.]
SMETHERGELL, WILLIAM, a pianist in
London, was author of ' A Treatise on Thorough
bass,' 1794, and composer of some sonatas and
other pieces for the pianoforte, and six overtures
for Vauxhall Gardens. He was organist of St.
Margaret on the Hill, South wark, and Allhallows,
Barking. [W.H.H.]
SMITH, CHARLES, born in London in 1786,
was in 1 796 admitted a chorister of the Chapel
SMITH.
Boyal trader Dr. Ayrton, but was withdrawn
from the choir in 1798 and became a pupil of
John Ashley. In 1800 he sang at the Oratorios,
Kanelagh, etc. Upon the breaking of his voice
be acted as deputy organist for Knyvett and
Stafford Smith at the Chapel Royal, and soon
afterwards became organist of Croydon Church.
In 1807 he was appointed organist of Welbeck
Chapel. He composed the music for the follow
ing dramatic pieces: 'Yes or No,' 1809; 'The
Tourist Friend,' and 'Hit or Miss,' 1810 ; 'Any
thing new,' 1811; and 'How to die for Love.'
In 1815 he appeared, with success, at the Orato
rios as a baritone singer. In the next year he
settled in Liverpool, where he resided for many
years. He composed many songs and ballads,
the best of which is ' The Battle of Hohenlinden.'
He ultimately retired to Crediton, Devon, where
he died Nov. 22, 1856. [W.H.H.]
SMITH, FATHEE, the usual appellation of
BERNARD SCHMIDT, a celebrated organ-builder,
born in Germany about 1630, and came to Eng
land in 1660 with two nephews, Gerard and Ber
nard, his assistants. To distinguish him from
these and express the reverence due to his abilities,
he was called Father Smith. His first organ in
this country was that of the Royal Chapel at
Whitehall, whicfy. Pepys mentions in his Diary
as having heard it on July 8, 1 660. Subsequently
he built one for Westminster Abbey, one for St.
Giles's-in-the-Fields (1671), and one for St. Mar
garet's, Westminster (1675), of which in the fol
lowing year he was elected organist at a salary
of £zo a year. He was now rapidly acquiring
fame and was appointed Organ maker in ordinary
to the King, apartments in Whitehall being al
lotted to him, called in the old plan ' The Organ-
builder's Workhouse.'
In 1682 the treasurers of the societies of the
Temple had some conversation with Smith re
specting the erection of an organ in their church.
Subsequently Renatus Harris, who had warm
supporters amongst the Benchers of the Inner
Temple, was introduced to their notice. It was
ultimately agreed that each artist should set up
an organ in the church, and in 1684 both instru
ments were ready for competition. In 1685 the
Benchers of the Middle Temple made choice of
Smith's organ ; but those of the Inner Temple
dissented, and it was not until 1688 that Smith
received payment for his instrument, namely
£1000.
In 1683 he contracted for the organ of Durham
Cathedral. In consequence of the reputation he
had acquired by these instruments, he was made
choice of to build an organ for St. Paul's Cathe
dral, then in course of erection. This instrument
was opened on Dec. 2, 1 697. Smith became Court
organ-builder to Queen Anne, and died 1 708.
According to Hawkins and Burney the two
nephews of Schmidt, as above mentioned, were
named Bernard and Gerard. But Horace Walpole
alters Bernard's name to Christian. These two
are very little known, although they built several
fine instruments.
In 1755 a Mr. Gerard Smith was organ -repairer
SMITH.
539
to Chelsea Hospital. This was probably a grand-
nephew of Father Smith, since from the date he
could hardly have been his nephew.
CHRISTOPHER SCHRIDER or SCHREIDER (possibly
Schroder), was one of Father Smith's workmen,
and previous to 1708 had become his son-in-law.
After Smith's death he succeeded to his business,
and in 1710 was organ-builder to the Royal
Chapels. His organs do not appear to be very
numerous, that of Westminster being his chef-
d'ceuvre. It was built for the coronation of
George II. in 1727, and was presented to the
Abbey by the King (Chrysander's Handel, ii.
174, note). He put up another organ in Henry
the Seventh's Chapel for the funeral of Queen
Caroline, Dec. 17, 1737, when Handel's noble
anthem, 'The ways of Zion,' was first sung
to its accompaniment (Ibid. 437, note; Stanley's
' Westminster Abbey,' p. 166). [V. de P.]
SMITH, GEORGE TOWNSHEND, son of Edward
Woodley Smith (born May 23, 1775, chorister
of St. Paul's Cathedral, afterwards lay vicar of
St. George's Chapel, Windsor, from 1795 until
his death, June 1 7, 1849), was born in the Horse
shoe Cloisters, Windsor, Nov. 13, 1813. He re
ceived his early musical education as a chorister
of St. George's, Windsor. On quitting the choir
he became a pupil of Highmore Skeats, the Chapel
organist, and afterwards came to London and
studied under Samuel Wesley. He next obtained
an appointment as organist at Eastbourne, whence
he removed to King's Lynn on being chosen or
ganist there. On Jan. 5, 1843, he was appointed
organist of Hereford Cathedral. As such he be
came, ex officio, conductor of the Meeting of the
Three Choirs at Hereford, besides discharging the
duties of which office he voluntarily undertook
the laborious office of honorary secretary to the
festival, and by his untiring and energetic exer
tions, in the course of the 12 triennial festivals
which he directed, raised it musically, from a
low to a very high condition, and financially,
from a heavy loss to a gain. He composed an
8-voice anthem and a Jubilate for the festivals,
and other church music. He died, very suddenly,
Aug. 3, 1877, universally beloved and respected.
His brother, MONTEM, was also educated in
the choir of St. George's. On quitting it he be
came a tenor singer, and is a lay vicar of West
minster Abbey, and a gentleman of the Chapel
Royal (1858). He is distinguished as a ballad
singer, for which his clear and distinct enuncia
tion of the words eminently qualify him, and for
his skill in * speaking' recitative. He is moreover
an excellent musician. He owes his singular bap
tismal name to the circumstance of his having
been born on a Whit-Tuesday during the per
formance of the now abolished Eton College
ceremony of ' Montem.'
Another brother, SAMUEL, was born in Eton
in 1821. In 1831 he was admitted as one of the
children of the Chapel Royal under William
Hawes. Shortly after leaving the choir he ob
tained the appointment of organist at Hayes
Church, Middlesex, and was subsequently organ
ist at Eton and Egham. In 1857 he became
540
SMITH.
organist at Trinity Church, Windsor, and in 1859
organist of the Parish Church, which post he
still holds. [W.H.H.]
SMITH, JOHN, commonly styled Dr. Smith,
was born at Cambridge in 1795. On Nov. 23,
1815, he was admitted to a situation in the choir
of Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin, but failed to
secure the appointment of vicar choral owing to
his having quarrelled and gone to law with the
Dean in 1824. On Feb. 5, 1819, he was appointed
a vicar choral of St. Patrick's Cathedral. About
1826 he assumed the title of Mus. Doc., but it is
very doubtful if the degree was ever really con
ferred upon him, no record of it existing. He
afterwards obtained the appointments of Chief
Composer of the State Music, Master of the
King's Band of State Musicians in Ireland, and
Composer to the Chapel Royal, Dublin; and
about 1845 was chosen Professor of Music in
Dublin University. He composed ' The Revela
tion,' an oratorio, some church music, and several
prize glees and other compositions. In 1837 he
published a volume of Cathedral Music containing
services and chants, and a ' Veni, Creator.' He
died Nov. 12, 1861. [W.H.H.]
SMITH, JOHN CHRISTOPHER, born in 1712,
was son of John Christopher Schmidt, of Anspach,
who, a few years later, came to England and
became Handel's treasurer. The younger Smith
showing a fondness for music, Handel commenced
teaching him when he was 13 years old. He
afterwards studied composition under Dr. Pepusch
and Thomas Roseingrave, and in 1732 produced
his English opera, ' Teraminta,' and in 1733
another opera, 'Ulysses.' In 1738 he composed
an oratorio, * David's Lamentation over Saul and
Jonathan.' About 1 745 he travelled on the con
tinent, remaining absent about three years. In
1750 he was appointed the first organist of the
Foundling Hospital Chapel. When Handel be
came blind Smith was employed as his amanuensis,
and Handel's latest compositions were dictated
to him. He also played the organ at Handel's
oratorio performances. In 1754 he composed the
opera of * The Fairies,' altered from Shakspere's
* Midsummer Night's Dream,' which met with
great success, and in 1756 the opera of 'The
Tempest,' adapted from Shakspere's play, two
songs in which, 'Full fathom five,' and 'The owl
is abroad,' long continued favourites; and in
1 760 ' The Enchanter,' a musical entertainment.
Handel bequeathed to him all his original MS.
scores, his harpsichord, his bust by Roubiliac,
and his portrait by Denner. After Handel's death
Smith carried on the oratorios, in conjunction
with Stanley, until 1774, when he retired and
went to reside at Bath. Besides the before-men
tioned works he composed 'Paradise Lost,' ' Re
becca,' 'Judith,' 'Jehoshaphat,' and 'Redemption,'
oratorios (besides compiling two oratorios from
Handel's works, 'Nabal,' and 'Gideon') ; 'Dario,'
' Issipile,' and ' 11 Ciro riconosciuto,' Italian
operas; a Burial Service; and several miscellaneous
vocal and instrumental pieces. George III. having
continued to Smith a pension which had been
granted by his mother, the Princess Dowager of
SMITH.
Wales, Smith evinced his gratitude by presenting
to the King all Handel's MS. scores — now at
Buckingham Palace — the harpsichord and the
bust by Roubiliac, retaining only the portrait by
Denner. He died Oct. 3, 1795. Two large col
lections of Handel's works exist in Smith's MS.,
one belonging to H. B. Lennard, Esq., Hampstead ;
the other to Dr. Chrysander. [See HANDEL, in
the Appendix.] [W.H.H.]
SMITH, JOHN STAFFORD, son of Martin Smith,
organist of Gloucester Cathedral from 1743 to
1/82, was born at Gloucester in 1750. He ob
tained his earliest musical instruction from his
father, and was soon afterwards sent to London
to study under Dr. Boyce, and also became a
chorister of the Chapel Royal under James
Nares. On quitting the choir he sedulously
pursued his studies, and became an able organist,
an efficient tenor singer, an excellent composer,
and an accomplished musical antiquary. In 1773
he was awarded two prizes by the Catch Club,
one for a catch, ' Here flat,' and the other for a
canon, ' 0 remember not the sins.' In the next
four years he gained prizes for the following
compositions; 'Let happy lovers fly,' glee, 1774;
* Since Phillis has bubbled,' catch, and ' Blest pair
of syrens, 'glee (5 voices), 1775 ; ' While fools their
time,' glee, 1 776 ; and ' Return, blest days,' glee,
1777. HG rendered great assistance to Sir John
Hawkins in the production of his History, not
only by reducing ancient compositions into
modern notation, but also by the loan of some
valuable early MSS. from his extensive and
curious library, from which Sir John culled
several pieces to enrich his Appendix. In 1779
he published ' A Collection of English Songs, in
score, for three and four voices, composed about the
year 1500. Taken from MSS. of the same age';
among which is the very interesting historical
song, ' Our king went forth to Normandy,' com
memorative of the victory of Agincourt. In 1 780
he won another prize from the Catch Club by his
ode, ' When to the Muses' haunted hill.' He
published at various times five collections of
glees, containing compositions which place him
in the foremost rank of English glee composers.
Besides his prize glees they include 'As on a
summer's day,' ' What shall he have that killed
the deer ? ' ' Hark, the hollow woods resounding,'
and the madrigal ' Flora now calleth forth each
flower.' 14 glees, 14 catches, 4 canons, 2 rounds,
an ode, a madrigal, and a motet by him are
given in Warren's collections. He also pub
lished a collection of songs, and ' Twelve Chants
composed for the use of the Choirs of the Church
of England.' On Dec. 16, 1784, after having for
many years officiated as a deputy, he was ap
pointed a gentleman of the Chapel Royal, and on
Feb. 22, 1785, a lay vicar of Westminster Abbey,
being installed, after his year of probation, April
18, 1786. In 1790 he was engaged as organist
at Gloucester Festival. In 1793 he published a
volume of ' Anthems, composed for the Choir
Service of the Church of England.' In 1802,
upon the death of Dr. Arnold, he was appointed
one of the organists of the Chapel Ro^al, and on
SMITH.
May 14, 1805, upon the resignation of Dr. Ayrton,
succeeded him as Master of the Children. In
1812 he produced his interesting work ' Musica
Antiqua.' [See MUSICA ANTIQUA.] In June
1817 he resigned the Mastership of the Children
of the Chapel Royal. Besides the before-named
compositions he produced ' An Ode on the First
of April,' for voices and instruments, which was
never published. A MS. 'Introduction to the Art
of composing Music,' by him is in the library of
the Sacred Harmonic Society, which also con
tains his Musical Commonplace Book. He
died Sept. 20, 1836. By his will, dated Jan. 21,
1834, he bequeathed all his property to his only
surviving daughter, Gertrude Stafford Smith, and
appointed her sole executrix. She proved the
will Oct. 20, 1836 (personalty sworn under
£12.000), and took possession of the property.
A few years afterwards she became insane, and in
1844 the Commissioner in Lunacy ordered that
her property should be realised and the proceeds
invested for her benefit. Through ignorance or
carelessness the contents of her house (which in
cluded her father's valuable library, remarkably
rich in ancient English musical manuscripts), were
entrusted for sale to an auctioneer who, however
well qualified he might have been to catalogue
the furniture, was utterly incompetent to deal
with the library. It was sold April 24, 1844,
such books as were described at all being cata
logued from the backs and heaped together in
lots, each containing a dozen or more works ;
2191 volumes were thrown into lots described as
' Fifty books, various,' etc. The printed music
was similarly dealt with ; the MSS. were not
even described as such, but were lumped in lots
of twenties and fifties, and called so many
'volumes of music.' 578 volumes were so dis
posed of, and there were besides five lots each
containing ' a quantity of music.' The sale took
place at an out-of-the-way place in the Gray's
Inn Road ; Smith's name did not appear on the
catalogue ; nothing was done to attract the at
tention of the musical world, and two dealers,
who had obtained information of the sale, pur
chased many of the lots at very low prices. These
after a time were brought into the market, but
it is feared the greater part of the MSS. are al
together lost. [W.H.H.]
SMITH, ROBERT ARCHIBALD, born at Reading
Nov. 1 6, 1 780. His father, a Paisley silk-weaver,
finding his trade declining in Reading, removed
back to Paisley in 1 800. Robert soon showed a
great aptitude for music, and at ten could play
the violin. In 1807 he was appointed leader of
the psalmody at the Abbey Church, Paisley, a
situation which he filled for many years. While
there he made the acquaintance of Robert Tan-
nahill the poet, many of whose fine lyrics he set
to music. One of these, 'Jessie, the Flow'r o'
Dunblane,' published in 1808, at once made its
mark, and was universally admired.
Smith possessed a fine vein of melody, and in
vocal composition had at that time perhaps no
equal in Scotland. In 1820 he began to publish
'The Scottish Minstrel' (6 vols. 8vo. 1820-24)
SMITH.
541
containing several hundreds of the best Scottish
songs, not a few of them his own, frequently
without indication. It is still considered a good
compilation. In Aug. 1823 he obtained the
leadership of the psalmody at St. George's Church,
Edinburgh, under the Rev. Dr. Andrew Thomson,
whose son John was destined in after years to
become the first musical Reid professor in Edin
burgh University. [See THOMSON, JOHN.] Be
sides anthems and other pieces (most of the
former written for the boys of George Heriot'3
Hospital), Smith now found time to publish his
' Irish Minstrel,' followed in 1826 by an ' Intro
duction to Singing,' and in 1827 by 'Select
Melodies of all Nations,' in one volume, one of
his best works. In 1828 he brought out his
'Sacred Harmony of the Church of Scotland,*
by which he is now best known. His health was
at no time robust, and he suffered from dyspepsia,
under which he finally sank, Jan. 3, 1829.
' Smith,' says the late George Hogarth, ' was
a musician of sterling talent. . . . His composi
tions are tender, and tinged with melancholy;
simple and unpretending, and always graceful
and unaffectedly elegant. . . . He had the ad
mirable good sense to know how far he could
safely penetrate into the depths of counterpoint
and modulation without losing his way ; and ac
cordingly his music is entirely free from scientific
pedantry.' His most popular pieces are the songs
' Jessie, the Flow'r o' Dunblane ' ; ' London's
bonnie woods and braes ' ; and ' Bonnie Mary
Hay ' ; the duet ' Row weel, my boatie ' ; the
trio ' Ave Sanctissima ' ; and the anthems ' Sing
unto God,' and ' How beautiful upon the moun
tains ' ; although many more might be named
which are yet frequently sung. Owing to the
modern alterations in congregational singing, the
introduction of German chorales and ancient ec
clesiastical melodies, and the change from florid
to syllabic tunes, Smith's 'Sacred Harmony' is
to a great extent superseded. But it still has its
value, even at a distance of fifty years from its
publication. [D.B.]
SMITH, SIDNEY, born at Dorchester, July 14,
1839, received his first musical instruction from
his parents, and at the age of 1 6 went to Leipzig,
where he studied the piano under Moscheles and
Plaidy ; the violoncello under Grutzmacher ;
harmony and counterpoint under Hauptmann,
Richter, and Papperitz; and composition under
Rietz. He returned to England in 1858, and in
the following year, on the advice of the late Mr.
Henry Blagrove, he settled in London, where he
has since resided, enjoying considerable reputa
tion as a teacher. His compositions, which are
confined to PF. pieces, are extremely popular
with the numerous class of performers whose
tastes are satisfied by a maximum of brilliancy
combined with a minimum of difficulty. The
most successful of his pieces are ' La Harpe
Eolienne,' 'Le Jetd'Eau,' 'The Spinning Wheel,'
and a 'Tarantella' in E minor, which (like most
of his compositions) have been published and
met with the same popularity on the Continent
as in England. [W.B.S.]
542
SMORZANDO.
SMORZANDO (Ital., ' fading away '). A term
with the same meaning as Morendo, but used
indiscriminately in the course of a piece. [See
MORENDO.]
SNETZLER, JOHN, was born at Passau in
Germany about 1710. This truly eminent or
gan-builder, after acquiring some fame in his
own country, was induced to settle in England,
where he built the noble instrument at Lynn
Regis (1754); a very fine one at St. Martin's,
Leicester (1774) ; that of the German Lutheran
Chapel in the Savoy, which was the first in this
country provided with a pedal clavier; and
many others. Two stories are current of his
imperfect way of speaking English and his
quaint expressions. At the competition for the
place of organist to his new organ at Halifax
(1766) he was so annoyed by the rapid playing
of Dr. Wainwright, that he paced the church,
exclaiming, 'He do run over de keys like one
cat, and do not give my pipes time to shpeak.'
And at Lynn he told the churchwardens, upon
their asking him what their old organ would be
worth if repaired, 'If they would lay out £100
upon it, perhaps it would be worth fifty.'
Snetzler lived to an advanced age, and died at
the end of the last or the commencement of the
present century. Having saved sufficient money,
he returned to his native country ; but after
being so long accustomed to London porter and
English fare, he found in his old age that he
could not do without them, so he returned to
London, where he died. His successor was
Ohrmann. [See HILL & SONS.] [V. de P.]
SNOW, VALENTINE, was probably of the same
family as Moses Snow, gentleman of the Chapel
Royal from 1689 until his death, Dec. 20, 1702,
and also lay-vicar of Westminster Abbey, and a
minor composer. He became the finest performer
upon the trumpet of his day; was a member of
Handel's oratorio orchestra ; and it was for him
that the great composer wrote the difficult ob-
bligato trumpet parts in ' Messiah,' ' Samson,'
'Dettingen Te Deurn,' 'Judas Maccabeus,' etc.
No better evidence of his ability can be required.
In Jan. 1 753 he was appointed (in succession to
John Shore, deceased) Sergeant Trumpeter to
the King, which office he held until his death in
Dec. 1770. [W.H.H.]
SNUFF-BOX, MUSICAL. A mechanical
invention which has given pleasure to thousands
from the peculiar — what for want of a better
expression we may call ^Eolian — charm arising
from the production of harmonics in the solid part
of the steel comb which provides the necessary
reinforcement to the sounds emitted by the teeth
of the comb. The motive power is a pinned
cylinder resembling the barrel of a mechanical
organ, and made to shift on the same principle ;
the working power is a spring ; the mechanism
and rotation are closely allied to those of a watch
or clock ; and the teeth of the comb which pro
duce the notes are measured to scale.
Musical boxes were invented about the begin
ning of the present century, probably in Switzer-
SNUFF-BOX, MUSICAL.
land, the chief seat of their production, where
there are now some twenty principal manufac
tories. About 30,000 are said to be made
annually, half of which are below the selling
value of 50 francs each. The original musical
boxes are small and not unlike a snuff-box in
appearance. They are now made of all sizes, the
cost ranging from 205. to 50^.
About 1830, a very favourite composition with
amateurs of the pianoforte was the 'Snuff-box
Waltz,' the composer of which preserved his
anonymity under the initials M.S. The scale
and arpeggio passages, played with much use of
both pedals, produced something of the musical-
box effect upon the hearer, enhanced a few years
later by the introduction in pianos of brass
bridges and harmonic bars, which are to a certain
extent subject to the acoustical conditions which
affect the musical-box combs. Such a passage as
the following, from the ' Snuff-box Waltz,' illus
trates the kind of imitation that was possible:
8va sempre
Of late years, bells, drums, castagnettes, free
reeds worked by bellows, and more recently
a 'zither,' produced by a sheet of thin paper
resting on the teeth of the comb, have been in
troduced, and have not raised the musical value
of the instrument, any more than similar intro
ductions early in the century raised the value of
the pianoforte. As pointed out by Mr. Moonen in
his recent Report on the Melbourne Exhibition,
the real improvements have been in the me
chanical portion, by the accurate ' pointing ' or
adjustment on the cylinder of as many as 36 airs ;
SNUFF-BOX, MUSICAL.
the obtaining a constant movement for an hour
and a half without requiring to wind up the
spring during that time ; the possibility of shift
ing the barrel in such a manner that an air
'noted' may be played without the necessity of
going through all the others in rotation, and the
important one of the interchange of barrels made
to fit any box. [A. J.H.]
SOCIED ADE DE QUARTETOS DO PORTO
(Quartet Society of Oporto). This society, the
only one of the kind in Portugal, originated in
private musical gatherings at the house of a
banker of Oporto (Sr. Joao Miranda Guimaraes).
In 1875 the violoncellist J. Casella settled in
Oporto, and it was resolved to give public con
certs. The first subscription was for 1 2 concerts,
and resulted in a net profit of about £32. En
couraged by these results, the same little body
of musicians have continued to give two series
of chamber concerts yearly, 1 2 in the autumn,
and 6 in the spring. They take place on Sunday
atternoons in a small concert-room at the S. Joao
Theatre. The audience numbers usually about
I oo persons. The programmes are entirely in
strumental, and consist of movements from the
chamber-music of the great masters, as well as
from the works of Grieg, Dvorak, Saint-Saens,
Liszt, Gradener, Svendsen, Tchaikowsky, and
Miguel Angelo. Short analytical remarks are
written by Sr. B. V. Moreira de Sa", to whose
energy and enthusiasm the society owes much of
its success. [W.B.S.]
SOCIETA ARMONICA. Founded about
1 8 2 7 for the purpose of giving subscription concerts
in which symphonies, overtures, and occasionally
instrumental chamber works were intermingled
with vocal numbers usually drawn from the
Italian operas. Mr. H. Forbes was the con
ductor, and Tolbecque and the younger Mori
were the leaders of the band. Beethoven's Over
ture in C major, Berlioz's Overture to ' Les
Francs Juges,' Reissiger's Overture in F minor,
and the Overture to ' Les Huguenots ' were among
the works which gained a first hearing in Eng
land at the Society's concerts ; and Weber's
Mass in G was also produced at one of the per
fonnances. Among the vocalists who assisted
in the concerts were Mmes. Grisi, Persiani, Al-
bertazzi, Wyndham, Bishop, Alfred Shaw, Miss
Clara Novello and Miss Birch, Messrs. Phillips,
Rubini, Tamburini and Lablache, Mario and
Ivanoff. The band included Spagnoletti, A.
Griesbach, Willy, Wagstaff, Dando, Patey, Jay,
Alsept, Lindley, Hatton, Brookes, Dragonetti,
Howell, Card, Ribas, Barrett, Harper, etc. Henri
Herz, the pianist and composer, and Hausmann
the violinist, made their first appearance in this
country at the Societa Armonica. The concerts
were successively held at the Crown and Anchor
Tavern in the Strand (now the Temple Club),
Freemasons' Tavern, and the Opera Concert
room in the Haymarket. They terminated in
or about the year 1850. [C.M.]
SOCIETE DE MUSIQUE DE CHAMBRE,
INSTRUMENTS ^ VENT. This is a society for
SOCIETY OF BRITISH MUSICIANS. 543
the performance of chamber-music for wind in-
truments in Paris. It was founded by Mons.
Paul Taffanel, a distinguished flute-player, and
the first concert took place on Feb. 6, 1879.
Six concerts are given in the February, March,
and April of each year at 4 p. m. on alternate
Thursdays, at the Salle Pleyel ; subscription, 20
francs per season. The executants are all artists
from the Conservatoire concerts, or those of Pas-
deloup — such as flute, Taffanel ; oboe, Gillet and
Boullard ; clarinet, Grisez and Turban ; bassoon,
Espaignet and Bourdeau ; horn, Garigue and
Br6mond ; piano, Louis Dimmer. The works
performed are classical, and include those of Bach,
Handel, Beethoven, Mozart, Weber, Schubert
(op. 160), Mendelssohn (op. 114), Schumann
(ops. 73, 94, 132), Spohr, Onslow, Ran0, Brahms
(ops. 1 6, 40), Liszt, Rubinstein, Saint Saens,
Dvorak (op. 44), Gouvy, etc. etc. [G.]
SOCIETY DBS CONCERTS DU CONSER
VATOIRE, LA— the body which gives the
famous concerts in Paris — was founded in 1828,
by Habeneck and a group of eminent musicians,
as already stated. [See vol. i. p. 385.] The
positions of acting and honorary president are
respectively filled by the chief conductor and the
director of the Conservatoire. The management
of the Society is in the hands of a committee
elected by the members. The committee meets
weekly on Tuesday mornings, and its chief duty
is to settle the programmes of each season.
The reading and selection of new works for
performance during the winter concerts is done
by the Society at large, meeting for that purpose
from and after October. There are two full re
hearsals for each concert.
The concerts themselves and their repetition
in a second series have been already described
[i. 386 a]. The first series is for the ' new' sub
scribers, the second for the 'old' ones. Each
series includes a 'Concert spirituel,' and since
1881 the second performance of this concert
takes place, not on Easter Sunday, but on the
Saturday before it. In the spring of 1882 M.
Deldevez was re-elected conductor, and M. Hey-
berger chorus-master. M. Garcin — solo violin at
the opera — is now sub-conductor.
The Socie'te" is entirely distinct from the
' Ecole normale de la musique franfaise.' It
has its own library, which however contains but
few unpublished works. The most interesting
is a small Symphony in C by Haydn, which is
always received with applause. [G. C.]
SOCIETY OF BRITISH MUSICIANS,
founded in 1834 with the object of advancing
native talent in composition and performance.
In the original prospectus of the Society attention
was called to the contrast between the encourage
ment offered to British painting, sculpture, and
the tributary arts at the Royal Academy, and
the comparative neglect of English music and
English musicians, the overwhelming prepon
derance of foreign compositions in all musical per
formances being cited as 'calculated to impress
the public with the idea that musical genius is
544 SOCIETY OF BRITISH MUSICIANS.
an alien to this country/ and as tending also ' to
repress those energies and to extinguish that
emulation in the breast of the youthful aspirant,
which alone can lead to pre-eminence.' One of the
rules adopted was to exclude all foreign music
from the programmes of the Society's concerts anc
to admit none but natives of Great Britain among
its members ; but this wae set aside in 1841, when
the Committee reported in favour of ' introducing
a limited proportion of music by composers nol
members of the Society either British or foreign,'
and the suggestion was adopted, though not with
out strong opposition, in which the editor of the
•Musical World' joined ('Musical World' ol
Oct. 14, 1841). In its earlier days the Society
achieved a complete success, numbering in 1836
as many as 350 members, while its finances
were also in a prosperous state. It not only
gave concerts of works of established merit, but
adopted a system of trial performances at which
many new compositions were heard. The pro
grammes included the names of all the leading
English writers of the day, who as a rule con
ducted their own works, among them Cipriani
Potter, G. A. Macfarren, W. H. Holmes, W. L.
Phillips, Sterndale Bennett, J. Hullah, J. H.
Griesbach, T. German Reed, W. M. Rooke,
H. Westrop, Joseph Barnett, H. C. Litolff, C.
Lucas, T. M. Mudie, James Calkin, and John
Goss. The music included orchestral and chamber
compositions, varied by vocal solos and part-
music, to which nearly all the above-named
composers contributed original works, and the
members in turn directed the performances.
After 1837 the Society began to decline, and
even when the introduction of music by foreign
composers was resolved upon, in the hope of
creating more general interest in the concerts,
it failed to restore the Society to prosperity, and
after another period of far from successful manage
ment a special appeal for support was put forth
at the close of 1854. At that date the members
included Messrs. H. C. Banister, W. S. Bennett,
H. Blagrove, J. B. Calkin, C. Coote, J. T. Cooper,
W. H. Holmes, C. E. Horsley, H. Lazarus, E. J.
Loder, Kate Loder (now Lady Thompson), C.
Neate, W. S. Rockstro, C. Severn, C. Steggall,
C. E. Stephens, J. W. Thirlwall, H. J. Trust,
J. Weslake, H. Westrop, J. Zerbini, and Sir
George Smart. This effort was ridiculed in the
'Musical World' of Dec. 16, 1854, on the ground
that the Society had no true claim to its title, as
many composers and artists of note held aloof
from it. The movement served however to draw
some new friends to the ranks, and as a means
of fulfilling its objects prizes were offered for
chamber compositions, which were gained in 1 86 1
by Ebenezer Prout and Edward Perry for string
quintets; in 1863 by J. Lea Summers and W.
Gibbons, also for string quintets ; and in 1864 by
Ebenezer Prout and J. Lea Summers, for quartets
for piano and strings. The umpires on these
occasions included Herr Joachim and Molique,
Signer Piatti, and Messrs. Cipriani Potter, G. A.
Macfarren, A. Mellon, T. M. Mudie and H.
Leslie, and the prize works were publicly per-
SOCIETY, THE MUSICAL ARTISTS'.
formed by Miss Zimmermann, Herr Joachim,
Messrs. A. Mellon, H. Webb, J. T. Carrodus,
W. Watson, J. T. Willy, W. T. Aylward, and
Signor Piatti. In 1865 the Society was dissolved,
its library was sold by Messrs. Puttick &
Simpson, and Mr. C. E. Stephens was appointed
custodian of the minute-books, etc. The secre
taries of the Society were Messrs. J. R. Tutton
(its founder) 1834-5 ; G. J. Baker, 1835 until
his death in 1851; J. Rackham, 1851-54; W.
W. Grice 1854-55. The Honorary Treasurers
were the three brothers, Jacob Erat 1834 until
his death in 1837; James Erat 1837 un*il his
death in 1858 ; and William Erat (pro tern.)
1858; and Cipriani Potter, 1858-65. The Society
and its library were housed gratuitously at 23
Berners Street, by Messrs. Erat, from 1834 until
1858, when they gave up the premises; 1858-59
in Wornum's Music Hall, Store Street; 1860 in
St. Martin's Hall until its destruction by fire on
Aug. 26, 1860 (when the Society's property was
saved); 1860-62 at 44 Charlotte Street, Fitzroy
Square, by permission of Mr. H. Webb ; and
1862-65 at Messrs. Collard's, Grosvenor Street,
free of all expense. For the first five years the con
certs were given at the Hanover Square Rooms,
and the trials of orchestral and chamber works
were subsequently held at those rooms or at the
above-named buildings. The Society on July 20,
1843, gave a complimentary concert to Spohr at
Erat's, and on June 15, 1844, at the same place,
a complimentary concert to Mendelssohn. [C.M.]
SOCIETY OF BRITISH AND FOREIGN
MUSICIANS. A benevolent society, established
in 1822 to provide a fund for the relief of its
members during sickness ; to assist in the support
of those who, by old age or unavoidable calamity
may become unable to follow their profession;
and to allow a certain sum at the death of a
member or a member's wife. The office is at 18
Rathbone Place, Oxford Street, and the Secretary
is Mr. A. C. Adams. [C.M.]
SOCIETY, THE MUSICAL ARTISTS',
founded in 1874 'to encourage living musicians
by giving performances of their compositions,
consists of a President (the Duke of Beaufort),
Vice-Presidents (Sir Julius Benedict, Professor
Macfarren, etc.), a Council of 9 members, and
about 70 members (Professors) and associates
(Non-Professors). The first public performance
took place on July 22, -1874, at the Conduit-
street Rooms, and was followed by three con
certs every year, until 1881, when four were
given. The objects of the Society will best be
seen by the list of some of the principal chamber
compositions it has brought forward. Its Hon.
Sec. (1882) is Dr. Jacob Bradford.
Quintet (Strings), J. Lea Summers,
Quintets (PF. and Strings), E. Fiori, Alg. Ashton.
Quartets (Strings), H. C. Banister, H. Baumer, Dr.
Bradford, A. Carnall, G. Gear, W. H. Holmes, Leh-
meyer, Mori, O. Prescott. C. J. Bead, C. E. Stephens,
J. Lea Summers.
Quartets (PF. and Strings), Alg. Ashton, 0. Prescott,
H. Westrop.
Trios <PF. and Strings), J. F. Barnett, J. B. Calkin,
F. E. Gladstone, A. Gilbert, C. Gardner, C. Maclean,
~ . Wolff, E. H. Thome, G. W. Hammond.
SOCIETY, THE MUSICAL ARTISTS'.
Sonatas (PF. and Violin\F. Davenport, W. H. Holmes,
E. Sharp, E. H. Thorne, H. Westrop, Emily Lawrence.
Sonatas (PF. and Cello), Alg. Aahton, B. Ellicott, O.
Prescott, E. H. Thorne, E. Sharp.
Sonatas (PF.), H. C. Bannister, C. Gardner, G. Gear,
G. A. Macfarren, A. O'Leary. f W.B.S.]
SODERMAN, JOHAN AUGUST, one of the
greatest Swedish composers of modern times, was
born in Stockholm, July 17, 1832 — his father be
ing director of the orchestra at a minor theatre
— and at an early age displayed traces of musical
genius. When 1 8 years of age he was selected by
Stjernstrb'm, the director of the orchestra at the
Eoyal theatre in Stockholm, as instructor to a
company of musicians, then on a tour to Finland.
On his return Sodennan wrote his first operetta,
with the fantastic title, ' The Devil's first rudi
ments of Learning,' which was performed at the
Mindre theatre at Stockholm, Sept. 14, 1856.
During the following two years he stayed in
Leipzig, studying under Richter and Hauptmann ;
in the year 1860 he was appointed chorus-master
at the Royal Opera in Stockholm ; and from that
date until his election as a member of the Swedish
Academy of Music, his life was occupied in such
minor offices in the musical world as are too
often the lot of great composers when cast in a
small community. But however poor the offices
he held, Soderman filled them with a sincerity
and zeal which many a man of inferior talents
might have envied.
His works are about 60 in number — operettas,
eongs, ballads, part-songs, funeral marches and
cantatas ; of which, however, only half have been
printed, and these at the expense of the Swedish
government after his death. Of the printed works
we can only mention a few, besides the above-
mentioned, namely 2 operettas, ' The wedding at
TJlfasa,' and 'Regina von Emmeritz ' ; overture to
' The Maid of Orleans ' ; songs ; ' Trios for male
voices,' containing the Finnish national air
'Suomi sang'; a Circassian dance, and a concert-
overture, also ' Sacred songs for organ,' contain
ing a number of hymns of great beauty and
purity, of which the best known are a Benedic-
tus and an Agnus Dei. Though a protestant, his
chef-d'oeuvre is a Mass for solos, chorus and
orchestra, which has only been twice performed
in Stockholm, but is considered by his coun
trymen as equal to any by the great composers,
and which is animated by such sincere devotion,
and stamped by such a high degree of originality
and masterly finish, as tp rank among the choicest
gems of Swedish music.
Another of his works worth mention is his
music to the poetry of Bellman. This poet, whose
genius is akin to that of Marlowe, has written
a number of rhapsodies, depicting the gay, jovial,
and careless nature of the Swede, with a force of
animal spirit and genuine originality which few
other poets have equalled ; and to these produc
tions, which every Swede knows by heart, Soder-
tnan set music.
The foreign composers who seem to have in
fluenced .his more elaborate productions are
Beethoven, Schubert, and, in particular, Schu
mann. His compositions, though thoroughly
VOL. in. PT. 5.
SOL-FA.
545
Swedish, are not national ; they bear the im
press of the vigorous and energetic nature of the
Northerner, which makes Scandinavian composi
tions so charming. Soderman died Feb. 10, 1876,
at the early age of 44, and a national subscription
was at once raised in Sweden for the benefit of
his widow and children. It was a token of the
gratitude and respect of a musical nation for a
great composer. [C.S.]
SOGGETTO. The Italian term for 'subject,'
as the theme of a movement. Thus in No. 1 2
of Bach's ' Musikalisches Opfer,' Frederick the
Great's theme is called ' II Soggetto reale.' [See
SUBJECT.] [G.]
SOL. The fifth note of the natural scale ac
cording to the nomenclature of France and Italy;
in English and German G. In the old hymn from
which Guido is supposed to have formed the scale
it occurs as follows : —
Ut queant laxia rcsonare fibris,
Miia, gestorum /«muli tuorum,
' pollutia fobia reatis.
The number of double vibrations to produce sol
(treble G) is — Paris normal pitch, 391-5; London
' Philharmonic pitch,' 405. [G.]
SOLDATENLIEBSCHAFT— Soldiers' love.
A i-act opera, containing an overture and 16
numbers, written by Mendelssohn in 1821 (his
1 3th year). The author of the words is unknown.
The autograph is in the Mendelssohn archives in
the Berlin Library. The work was evidently a
favourite with its author, for he proposed to re
peat it for the silver wedding of his parents, with
an operetta to be written by Fanny, and his own
' Heimkehr aus der Fremde.' It does not appear
however to have been then performed. [G.]
SOLENNIS, i.e. Solemn. * Missa solennis'
is a term employed to designate a mass on a grand
scale. Those of Beethoven in D, Schubert in Al>
(no. 5), and Liszt's 'Graner-Messe' are so entitled.
Four of Cherubini's — in C, E, G.and B b — are called
'Messe Solennelle,' but not that in A for the coro
nation of Charles X., which is for 3 voices only.
Gounod's Mass in G, and Rossini's in A minor,
have the same title. The term answers to the
'Hohe Messe' of Bach. [G.]
SOL-FA. * To sol-fa ' is to sing a passage or
a piece of vocal music, giving to the notes, not
the words, but the syllables, Do (C), Re (D),
Mi (E), Fa (F), Sol (G), La (A), Si (B), Do
(C). Why the two syllables Sol and Fa should
have been chosen to desig
nate this process in prefer
ence to Do Re, or Re Mi,
does not appear.
It may be convenient here
to give the scale with the
syllables for sharps or fiats,
as fixed by Mr. Hullah in
his 'Method of Teaching
Singing' (Longmans, 1880).
In a hymn recently written by Arrigo Boito
and composed by Mancinelli, for the opening of
the monument of Guido d'Arezzo at Rome, the
seven syllables are thus employed : —
N n
b
13
8
Du
Do
Da
Ba
Re
Ki
Me
Mi
—
Fo
Fa
Fe
Sul
Sol
Sal
Lo
La
Le
Se
Si
—
546 SOL-FA.
Util di Guido regola superna
.M/suratrice /acile de' suoni
So/enne or tu /aude a te stessa intuoni,
SiUaba eterna.
The roll or stick with which the conductors of
church choirs in Italy beat the time is called
the Sdlfa. [G.]
SOLFEGGIO, E GORGHEGGIO. Solfeggio
is a musical exercise for the voice upon the syl
lables Ut (or Do), Re, Mi, Fa, Sol, La, forming
the Guidonian Hexachord, to which was added
later the syllable Si upon the seventh or leading-
note, the whole corresponding to the notes C, D,
E, F, G, A, B of the modern Diatonic scale.
These names may be considered the result of an
accident ingeniously turned to account, the first
six being the first syllables of half lines in the
first verse of a hymn for the festival of St. John
Baptist, occurring upon the successive notes of
the rising scale, with a seventh syllable perhaps
formed of the initial letters of Sancte Johannes.
[See SOLMISATION.]
The first use of these syllables is ascribed to
Guido d'Arezzo as an artificial aid to pupils ' of
slow comprehension in learning to read music,'
and not as possessing any special virtue in the
matter of voice-cultivation; but it is by no
means clear that he was the first to use them. At
any rate they came into use somewhere about
his time. It is probable that even in Guido's
day (if voice -cultivation was carried to any
grade of perfection— which is hardly likely in an
age when nearly all the music was choral, and
the capacities of the voice for individual expres
sion were scarcely recognised), as soon as the
notes had been learned, the use of syllables was,
as it has been later, superseded by vocalisation,
or singing upon a vowel. The syllables may be
considered, therefore, only in their capacity as
names of notes. Dr. Crotch, in his treatise on
Harmony, uses them for this purpose in the
major key, on the basis of the movable Do,
underlining them thus, Do, etc., for the notes of
the relative minor scales, and gives them as
alternative with the theoretical names — Tonic,
or Do ; Mediant, or Mi; Dominant, or Sol, etc.
The continued use of the syllables, if the Do were
fixed, would accustom the student to a certain
vowel on a certain note only, and would not tend
to facilitate pronunciation throughout the scale.
If the Do were movable, though different vowels
would be used on different parts of the voice,
there would still be the mechanical succession
through the transposed scale ; and true reading —
which Hullah aptly calls ' seeing with the ear
and hearing with the eye,' that is to say, the
mental identification of a certain sound with a
certain sign — would not be taught thereby. Those
who possess a natural musical disposition do not
require the help of the syllables ; and as pronun
ciation would not be effectually taught by them,
especially after one of the most difficult and un
satisfactory vowels had been removed, by the
change of Ut to Do, and as they do not contain
all the consonants, and as moreover voice-
cultivation is much more readily carried out by
SOLFEGGIO.
perfecting vowels before using consonants at all,
— it was but natural that vocalisation should
have been adopted as the best means of re
moving inequalities in the voice and difficulties
in its management. Crescentini, one of the last
male soprani, and a singing-master of great
celebrity, says, in the preface to his vocal ex
ercises, ' Gli esercizj sono stati da me imaginati
per 1'uso del vocalizzo, cosa la piu necessaria per
perfezionarsi nel canto dopo lo studio f'atto de'
solfeggi, o sia, nomenclatura delle note ' — ' I have
intended these exercises for vocalisation, which
is the most necessary exercise for attaining per
fection in singing, after going through the study of
the sol-fa, or nomenclature of the notes.' Some
times a kind of compromise has been adopted
in exercises of agility, that syllable being used
which comes upon the principal or accented note
of a group or division, e. g.
Do--- Be--- Mi--- Fa--- Do
Ke
The word ' Solfeggio ' is a good deal misused,
and confounded with ' Vocalizzo ' in spite of the
etymology of the two words. The preface to the
4th edition of the ' Solfe'ges d'ltalie ' says ' La
plupart des Solfe'ges nouveaux Exigent qu'ils
soient Solfiis sans nommer les notes.' Here is
an absurd contradiction, and a confusion of
the two distinct operations of Solfeggiare and
Vocalizzare. We have no precise equivalent in
English for Solfeggio and Solfeggiare. The French
have Solfege and Solfier. We say, to Sol-fa,
and Sol-faing — a clumsy and ineuphonious verb-
substantive. As a question of voice-production,
the wisdom of vocalisation, chiefly upon the
vowel a (Italian), and certainly before other
vowels are practised, and most decidedly before
using consonants, has been abundantly proved.
The use of the words in question is not therefore
a matter of much importance. This appears to
be in direct opposition to the advice of a very fine
singer and an eminent master, Pier Francesco
Tosi, whose book upon singing was published at
Bologna in 1723, the English translation by Gal-
liard appearing in 1 742. He says, 'Let the master
never be tired in making the scholar sol-fa as
long as he finds it necessary ; for if he should
let him sing upon the vowels too soon, he knowa
not how to instruct.' 'As long as he finds it
necessary,' however, is a considerable qualifica
tion. The world lives and learns, and Crescen-
tini's verdict may safely be accepted. The vowel
a, rightly pronounced, gives a position of the
resonance-chambers most free from impediment,
in which the entire volume of air vibrates without
after-neutralisation, and consequently communi
cates its vibrations in their integrity to the outer
air ; this therefore is the best preparation, the
best starting-point for the formation of other
SOLFEGGIO.
vowels. After this vowel is thoroughly mastered
the others are comparatively easy, whereas if *
or u (Italian) are attempted at first, they are
usually accompanied by that action of the throat
and tongue which prevails to such a disagreeable
extent in this country. When the vowels have
been conquered, the consonants have a much
better chance of proper treatment, and of good
behaviour on their own part, than if attacked
at the outset of study. Vocalisation upon all
the vowels throughout the whole compass of the
voice should be practised after the vowel a is
perfected ; then should come the practice of syl
lables of all kinds upon all parts of the voice ;
and then the critical study and practice (much
neglected) of recitative.
The words GORGHEGGIO and GORGHEGGIARE,
from Gorga, an obsolete word for 'throat,' are
„ applied to the singing of birds, and by analogy
5 to the execution of passages requiring a very
5 quick and distinct movement or change of note,
such as trills and the different kinds of turn,
also re-iterated notes and quick florid passages
in general. The English verb 'to warble ' is given
i; as the equivalent of gorgheyyiare, but warbling
is usually accepted to mean a gentle wavering
or quavering of the voice, whereas agility and
brilliancy are associated with the Italian word.
A closer translation, 'throat-singing,' would give
a rendering both inadequate and pernicious — in
adequate, as throat-singing may be either quick
or slow, and pernicious as suggesting unnecessary
movement of the larynx, and helping to bring
about that defective execution so often heard,
in which there is more breath and jar than
music, closely resembling unnecessary movement
of the hand when using the fingers upon an in
strument.1 The fact is, that execution, however
rapid, should be perfect vocalisation in its tech
nical sense, and perfect vocalisation has for its
foundation the Portamento. The Portamento (or
carrying of the voice — the gradual gliding from
one note to another) removes inequalities in the
voice, and facilitates the blending of registers.
Increased in speed by degrees, the voice learns
to shoot from note to note with lightning-like
rapidity, and without the above-named convulsion
of the larynx which produces a partial or total
cessation of sound, or at any rate a deterioration
of sound during the instantaneous passage from
note to note. It is this perfect passage from
note to note, without lifting off or interrupting
the voice, that fills space with a flood of sound,
of which Jenny Lind s shake and vocalised pas
sages were a bright example. But this kind of
vocalisation is the result of years of conscientious
practice and the exercise of a strong will ; and
it is just this practice and strong will that are
wanting in the present day. Exercises are not
wanting. With such books as those of Garcia,
Panseron, Madame Sainton, and Randegger, etc.,
etc., and of course some special passages for in-
1 As Arpeggiare means 'to play upon the harp,' Gorgheggiare
means 'to play upon the throat,' or rather that part of the throat
known as the larynx ; in other words, to treat the voice for the time
only as an instrument.
SOLFEGGIO.
547
dividual requirements, to say nothing of those of
Rossini, and the numberless vocalizzi of Bordogni,
Nava, etc., etc., the 'Solfe'ges d'ltalie/ and the
' Solfe'ges du Conservatoire,' there is work enough
if students will avail themselves of it. Tosi, in
speaking of the difficulties in teaching and learn
ing the shake says, 'The impatience of the master
joins with the despair of the learner, so that they
decline farther trouble about it.' A summary
mode of getting over difficulties !
The first of the two great works just named is
entitled ' Solfe'ges d'ltalie, avec la Basse chiffre"e,
composes par Durante, Scarlatti, Hasse, Porpora,
Mazzoni, Caffaro, David Perez, etc. Dedie"s k
Messeigneurs les premiers Geutilshommes de la
chambre du Roi [Louis XV], et recueillis par les
Srs. Levesque et Be'che, ordinaires de la Musique
de sa MajesteV The work is therefore obviously
a collection of Italian Solfeggi made in France
by Frenchmen. Levesque was a baritone in the
King's Chapel from 1759 to 1781, and in. 1763
became master of the boys. Beche was an alto.
The first edition of the work appeared in 1768 ;
the fourth, published by Cousin eau, at Paris in
1786. It forms one large oblong volume, and is
in four Divisions : I. The ' indispensable princi
ples ' of singing — names of notes, etc., and 62
easy (anonymous) Solfeggi in the G clef with
figured bass. II. Solfeggi 63 to 152 for single
voices in various clefs — including G clef on 2nd
line and F clef on 3rd line — in common, triple,
and compound time, all with figured basses.
III. Solfeggi 153 — 241, with changing clefs, and
increasing difficulties of modulation and execu
tion — ending with the Exclamationcs quoted in
the text ; all with figured basses. Divisions II
and III are by the masters named in the title ;
each Solfeggio bearing the composer's name.
IV. 12 Solfeggi for 2 voices and figured bass by
David Perez, each in three or four movements.
The forms of fugue and canon are used through
out the work, and some of the exercises would
bear to be sung with words. One, by Hasse, is
a graceful arietta. A few extracts will show the
nature of the work. No. i exhibits the kind of
instrumental passage that frequently occurs in
Scarlatti's solfeggi. No. 2, by Leo, is very difficult,
and gives much work to the voice. No. 3, from
the exercises for two voices of David Perez, keeps
the voice much upon the high notes. No. 4,
from the same, requires, and is calculated to bring
about, great flexibility. No. 5, by Durante, is
curious, and is evidently intended as an exercise
in pathetic expression. It has no figured bass,
like the other exercises in this collection, but a part
in the alto clef, clearly intended for an obbligato
instrument, probably for the viol d'amore.
1. Allegro.
SCARLATTI.
Nu2
548
SOLFEGGIO.
SOLFEGGIO.
i *-» _m
1 I I
3.
DAVID PEREZ.
^
• -P- -•- ^ JL
1 " n run
•
*- — — sss — —
rp ' _ |fl^~ ^_ i |BS?3~~BiS3~ IL y M ^ —
^^=£
-4— •-
^-«-
^a^p:
_t±
T A T
I • l_»
«
£
5. Exclamationis animas Purgantium (sic).
Zar^o.
DURANTE.
Al Flglio.
Al Sp».
1
SOLFEGGIO.
SOLMISATION.
549
Ana V». SS . »
etc.
But the reader is strongly advised to refer to
this remarkable work for himself.
A later and very complete collection of exer
cises and studies is that published in Paris
by Heugel under the title of ' Solfeges du
Conservatoire, par 2Cherubini, Catel, Mdhul,
Gossec, et LangleV edited by Edouard Batiste,
Professeur de Solfe'ge,' etc. It is in eight
volumes 8vo., including a hundred preparatory
exercises by Batiste himself. The first exercise
in the main collection is a short theme with
57 variations. The studies increase in diffi
culty, and the later ones require great powers
of vocalisation. Those by Gossec abound in re
iterated notes and in passages of extended com
pass. There are duets and trios, some of which
are very elaborate. A curious one by Cherubini
is in free fugal imitation, with the respective
entries of the second and third voices taking
place at an interval of 24 bars. Canons and
fugues are in abundance, amongst them a fugue
in 5-4 by Catel. One exercise by Cherubini is
without bars, and another by the same composer
is headed ' Contrepoint rigoureux a cinq voix
sur le Plaint Chant.' If these two collections of
vocalizzi are studied and conquered, an amount
of theoretical and practical knowledge, as well
as control over the voice, will have been gained
that will fulfil every possible requirement pre
paratory to acquaintance with the great operatic
and oratorical works. Mention must not be
omitted of Concone's useful Exercises, of more
modest calibre, which have gained a large popu
larity throughout musical Europe ; nor of those
of Madame Marchesi-Graumann, which give a
great deal of excellent work, and were highly
approved by Rossini. [H.C.D.]
SOLIE, JEAN PIERRE (real name SOULIER),
born at Nimes, 1755, died in Paris Aug. 6, 1812,
was one of the good singers and composers at
the Opera Comique in its early days. The son
of a cello-player he learnt that instrument, and
had a good musical education at the Nimes
tnaitrise, after which he played in the orchestra
and taught singing till his debut as a tenor in
1778. His success in the provinces tempted
him to go to Paris, but he failed at first, in
1782, and remained away till after three years
success in the largest theatre of Lyons. He was
1 The abbreviation ' Alia V> SS» ' can hardly mean other than
1 alia. Vergine Santissima.' Tlie a must be a mistake of the French
printer. These abbreviations are alternated through the exercise
with, farther on, 'Satila al celo,* 'Alia SS» Trinita." and last of all
'co moti gloria Eterna.' The word ' Satila ' must also be a mistake.
A later edition has this phrase, 'Satila al colo,' and the other 'co
moll gloria eterna.1 This does not help to clear up the matter.
2 Cherubini's Autograph Catalogue [see vol. i. p. 343 a] contains
an immense number of Solfeggi written between the years 1822
and 1*42, jn his capacity of Director of the Conservatoire, for the
Examinations of the Pupils of that Institution.
engaged in 1787 for the Opera Comique, where
he remained, gradually making his way up
wards to the first place in the company, espe
cially after relinquishing the part of tenor de
gout for that of baritone. The baritone was
then a novelty, and Mehul wrote for Solie
several parts which have since become identified
with his name. He next tried his hand at
composition, and with equal success, for his
operas comiques number 33 in all, 'Jean et
Genevieve' (1792) being the first, and 'Les
Me'nestrels' 3 acts (1811) the last. 'Le Jockey'
(Jan. 6), 'Le Secret' (April 20, 1796), ' Le
Chapitre Second' (June 17, 1799) in one act;
and ' Le Diable a quatre' (Nov. 30, 1809), and
' Mademoiselle de Guise' in 3 (March 17, 1808),
were published. Though this music is now
entirely out of date, many of its pretty airs
became favourites with the vaudeville writers,
and were set to a variety of words. Several
may be found in the ' Clef du Caveau.'
Solie* had several sons ; the eldest drowned
himself in 1802 ; but Emile (born in Paris,
1801) published in 1847 two pamphlets on the
Op£ra Comique and Ope'ra, also some short
biographies of French musicians. He left a son,
Charles, who is a conductor, and produced at
Nice in 1879 an op4ra-comique, 'Schema Baba,
ou 1'intrigue du Harem,' 3 acts, the subject of
which seems to have been borrowed from the
' Intrigue au Sdrail.' [G.C.]
SOLITAIRE, LE. Carafa's most popular
opera comique ; in 3 acts, words by Planard. Pro
duced at the Feydeau, Aug. 17, 1822. Its most
favourite number, though not its best, is a ron
deau —
C'est le solitaire,
Qui voit tout,
Qui salt tout,
Entend tout,
Est partout. [G.]
SOLMISATION (Lat. Solmisatio). The art
of illustrating the construction of the Musical
Scale by means of certain syllables, so associated
with the sounds of which it is composed as to
exemplify both their relative proportions, and the
functions they discharge as individual members
of a system based upon fixed mathematical prin
ciples.
The laws of Solmisation are of scarcely less
venerable antiquity than those which govern
the accepted proportions of the Scale itself. They
first appear among the Greeks, and doubtless
proved as useful to the Fathers of the Lyric
Drama, and the Singers who took part in its
gorgeous representations in the great Theatre at
Athens, as they have since done to Vocalists of
all ages. Making the necessary allowance for
differences of Tonality, the guiding principle in
those earlier times was precisely the principle
by which we are guided now. Its essence con
sisted in the adaptation to the Tetrachord of such
syllables as should ensure the recognition of the
Hemitone, wherever it occurred. Now, theHemi-
tone of the Greeks, though not absolutely identical
with our Diatonic Semitone, was its undoubted
550
SOLMISATION.
SOLMISATION.
homologue j1 and, throughout their system, this
Hemitone occurred between the first and second
sounds of every Tetrachord ; just as, in our Major
Scale, the Semitones occur between the third and
fourth Degrees of the two disjunct Tetrachords
by which the complete Octave is represented.
Therefore, they ordained that the four sounds
of the Tetrachord should be represented by the
four syllables, ra, re, rrj, rot ; and that, in passing
from one Tetrachord to another, the position of
these syllables should be so modified, as in every
case to place the Hemitone between ra and rt,
and the two following Tones between re and TTJ,
and T7) and TCU, respectively.2
When, early in the nth century, Guido
d' Arezzo substituted his Hexachords for the Tetra
chords of the Greek system, he was so fully alive
to the value of this principle, that he adapted it
to another set of syllables, sufficiently extended
to embrace six sounds instead of four. In the
choice of these he was guided by a singular co
incidence. Observing that the Melody of a
Hymn, written about the year 770 by Paulus
Diaconus, for the Festival of S. John the Baptist,
was so constructed, that its successive phrases
began with the six sounds of the Hexachord,
taken in their regular order, he adopted the
syllables sung to these notes as the basis of his
new system of Solmisation, changing them from
Hexachord to Hexachord, on principles to be
hereafter described, exactly as the Greeks had
formerly changed their four syllables from Tetra
chord to Tetrachord.
. C sol-fa-ul.
D la-sol-re.
UT que-ant lax - - Is EE - - so - na - re. fi - bris
E la-mi. Ffa-ttt.
MI - - - - ra ges - - to-rum FA - mu-li tu - - o-rum
G sol-re-ut. A la-mi-re.
— , x--, I
&' f~,_£2~s*
SOL - - - - ve pol-iu-tl LA - bi - i re - . - - turn
Sane - te lo - an - nes.
It will be seen, from this example, that the
syllables, Ut, Be, Mi, Fa, Sol, La,3 were origin
ally sung to the notes C, D, E, F, G, A ; that is
to say, to the six sounds of the Natural Hexa
chord : and that the Semitone fell between the
third and fourth syllables, Mi and Fa, and these
only. [See HEXACHORD.] But, when applied to
the Hard Hexachord, these same six syllables
1 The Diatonic Semitone is represented by the fraction --5- ; the
Greek Hemitone by i||-Jr, that is to say, by a Perfect Fourth, minus
two Greater Tones.
2 Though the true pronunciation of the Greek vowels is lost, we are
not left without the means of forming an approximate idea of it, since
Homer uses the syllable )3ij to imitate the bleating of the sheep.
3 Gerard Vossius, in his tract ' De quatuor Artibus popularibus '
(Amsterdam 1650), mentions the following Distich as having been
written, shortly after the time of Guido, for the purpose of impress-
Ing the six syllables upon the learner's memory—
' Cur adhibes tristi numeros cantumque labor! ?
UT KBlevet Mlserum FAtum SOLitosque LAbores.'
represented the notes G, A, B, C, D, E ; while,
in the Soft Hexachord, they were sung to F, G,
A, Bb, C, D. The note C therefore was some
times represented by Ut, sometimes by Fa, and
sometimes by Sol, according to the Hexachord
in which it occurred ; and was consequently
called, in general terms, C sol-fa-ut. In like
manner, A was represented either by La, Mi, or
Re ; and was hence called A la-mi-re, as indi
cated, in our example, by the syllables printed
above the Stave. But, under no possible circum
stances could the Semitone occur between any
other syllables than Mi and Fa ; and herein, as
we shall presently see, lay the true value of the
system.
So long as the compass of the Melody under
treatment did not exceed that of a single Hexa
chord, the application of this principle was
simple enough ; but, for the Solmisation of Melo
dies embracing a more extended range, it was
found necessary to introduce certain changes,
called Mutations, based upon a system corre
sponding exactly with the practice of the Greeks.
[See MUTATION.] Whenever a given Melody ex
tended (or modulated) from one Hexachord into
another, the syllables pertaining to the new series
were substituted for those belonging to the old
one, at some convenient point, and continued, in
regular succession, until it became convenient to
change them back again ; by which means the
compass of the Scale could be enlarged to any
required extent.
For instance, in the following example the
passage begins at (a), in the Natural Hexachord
of C, but extends upwards three notes beyond its
compass, and borrows a Bb from the Soft Hexa
chord of F. As it is not considered desirable to
defer the change until the extreme limits of the
first Hexachord have been reached, it may here
be most conveniently made at the noteG. Now,
in the Natural Hexachord, G is represented by
the syllable Sol ; in the Soft Hexachord, by Re.
In this case, therefore, we have only to substitute
Ee for Sol, at this point ; and to continue the
Solmisation proper to the Soft Hexachord to the
end of the passage, taking no notice whatever of
the syllable printed in Italics.
Soft Hexachord.
(a)
Ut
Ee
Mi Fa
Sol U
ut
Ke
Mi Fa
Sol
La
Natural Hexachord.
At (5), on the other hand, the passage extends
downwards, from the Hexachord of G, into that
of C. Here, the change may be most conveniently
effected by substituting the La of the last-named
Hexachord for the Ee of the first, at the note A.
(6) Hard Hexachord.
La Sol Fa Mi He
Vt
La. Sol Fa Mi Be Ut^
Natural Hexachord.
SOLMISATION.
The first of these Mutations is called Sol-re, in
allusion to its peculiar interchange of syllables :
the second is called Re-la. As a general rule,
Re is found to be the most convenient syllable for
ascending Mutations, and La, for those which
extend downwards, in accordance with the re
commendation contained in the following Distich :
Vocibus utaris solum mutando duabus
Per re quidem sursum mutatur, per la deorsum.
This rule, however, does not exclude the occa
sional use of the forms contained in the subjoined
Table, though the direct change from the Hard
to the Soft Hexachord, and vice versa, is not
recommended.
Descending Mutations.
1. Fa-s jl. From \ he Hard to the Soft Hexachord, chang
ing on C.
2. Mi-la. Nat.'to Hard Hex. changing on E. Soft to
Nat. Hex. changing on A.
3. Re-la. Hard to Nat. Hex. changing on A. Nat. to
Soft Hex. changing on D.
4. Re-mi. Hard to Soft Hex. changing on A.
5. Re-sol. Nat. to Hard Hex. changing on D. Soft to
Nat. Hex. changing on G.
6. Sol-la. Hard to Soft Hex. changing on D.
7. Ul-Ja. Nat. to Hard Hex. changing on C. Soft to
Nat. Hex. changing on F.
8. Ut-re. Hard to Soft Hex. changing on G.
Ascending Mutations.
9. Fa-ut. Hard to Nat. Hexachord, chancing on C.
Nat. to Soft Hex. changing on F.
10. La-mi. Hard to Nat. Hex. changing on E.
11. La-re. Nat. to Hard Hex. changing on A. Soft to
Nat. Hex. changing on D.
12. La-sol. Soft to Hard Hex. changing on D.
1). Mi-re. Do. Do. A.
14. Be-ul. Do. Do, G.
15. Sol-fa. Do. Do. C.
16. Sol-re. Hard to Nat. Hex. changing on D. Nat. to
Soft Hex. changing on G.
17. Sol-ut. Nat. to Hard Hex. changing on G. Soft to
Nat. Hex. changing on C.
The principle upon which this antient system
was based is that of ' the Moveable Ut ' — or, as
we should now call it, 'the Moveable Do'; an
arrangement which assists the learner very
materially, by the recognition of a governing
syllable, which, changing with the key, regulates
the position of every other syllable in the series,
calls attention to the relative proportions existing
between the root of the Scale and its attendant
sounds, and, in pointing out the peculiar charac
teristics of each subordinate member of the
system, lays emphatic stress upon its connection
•with its fellow degrees, and thus teaches the ear,
as well as the understanding. We shall presently
have occasion to consider the actual value of
these manifold advantages; but must first trace
their historical connection with the Solmisation
of a later age.
So long as the Ecclesiastical Modes con
tinued in use, Guido's system answered its pur
pose so thoroughly, that any attempt to improve
upon it would certainly have ended in failure.
But, when the functions of the Leading-Note
were brought more prominently into notice, the
demand for a change became daily more and
more urgent. The completion of the Octave
rendered it not only desirable, but imperatively
necessary, that the sounds should no longer be
arranged in Hexachords, but, in Heptachords, or
SOLMISATION.
551
Septenaries, for which purpose an extended syl
labic arrangement was needed. We have been,
unable to trace back the definite use of a seventh
syllable to an earlier date than the year 1599,
when the subject was broached by Erich van der
Putten (Erycius Puteanus) of Dordrecht, who,
at pages 54, 55 of his 'Pallas modulata,'1 pro
posed the use of BI^ deriving the idea from the
second syllable of lafoi.' No long time, how
ever, elapsed, before an overwhelming majority
of theorists decided upon the adoption of SI,
the two letters of which were suggested by the
initials of 'Sancte loannes' — the Adonic verse
which follows the three Sapphics in the Hymn
already quoted.2 The use of this syllable was
strongly advocated by Sethus Calvisius, in his
' Exercitatio musicae tertia,' printed in 1611.
Since then, various attempts have been made
to supplant it, in favour of Sa, Za, Ci, Be, Te,
and other open syllables;3 but, the suggested
changes have rarely survived their originators,
though another one, of little less importance —
the substitution of Do for Ut on account of its
greater resonance — has, for more than two hun
dred years, been almost universally accepted.
[See Do.] Lorenzo Penna,4 writing in 1672,
speaks of Do as then in general use in Italy ; and
Gerolamo Cantone 5 alludes to it, in nearly similar
terms, in 1678, since which period the use of Ut
has been discontinued, not only in Italy, but in
every country in Europe, except France.
In Germany and the Netherlands far more
sweeping changes than these have been proposed,
from time to time, and even temporarily ac
cepted. Huberto Waelrant (1517-1595), one of
the brightest geniuses of the Fourth Flemish
School, introduced, at Antwerp, a system called
' Bocedisation,' or ' Bobisation,' founded on seven
syllables — Bo, Ce, Di, Ga, Lo, Ma, Ni — which
have since been called the ' Voces Belgica?.' At
Stuttgart, Daniel Hitzler (1576-1635) based a
system of ' Bebisation ' upon La, Be, Ce, De, Me,
Fe, Ge. A century later, Graun (1701-1759)
invented a method of ' Damenisation,' founded
upon the particles, Da, Me, Ni, Po, Tu, La, Be.
But none of these methods have survived.
In England, the use of the syllables Ut and
Re died out completely before the middle of the
1 7th century ; and recurring changes of Mi, Fa,
Sol, La, were used, alone, for the Solmisation of all
kinds of Melodies. Butler mentions this method
as being in general use, in i6366; and Playford
calls attention to the same fact in 165 5.'
In France, the original syllables, with the
added Si, took firmer root than ever in Italy ; for
it had long been the custom, in the Neapolitan
Schools, to use the series beginning with Do for
those Keys only in which the Third is Major.
1 ' Pallas modulata, slve Septem discrimina vocum ' (Milan, 1599).
afterwards reprinted, under the title ot •Musathena' (Hanover, 1602).
2 it has been said, that. In certain versions ot the Melody, the first
syllable of the Adonic verse is actually sung to the note B ; but we
have never met with such a version, and do not believe in the possi
bility of its existence. 3 See Si, vol. iii. p. 490.
4 ' Albori musicale ' (Bologna, 1672).
5 'Armenia Gregoriana' (Turin, 1678).
6 'Principles of Musick.' by C. Butler (Lond. 1636).
7 'Introduction to the Skill of Musick '_(Lond. 1655).
552
SOLMISATION.
SOLO ORGAN.
For Minor Keys, the Neapolitans begin with
Re ; using Fa for an accidental Flat, and Mi for
a Sharp. Durante, however, when his pupils
were puzzled with a difficult Mutation, used to
cry out, ' Only sing the syllables in tune, and
you may name them after devils, if you like.'
The truth is, that, as long as the syllables are
open, their selection is a matter of very slight
importance. They were never intended to be
used for the formation of the Voice, which may
be much better trained upon the sound of the
vowel, A, as pronounced in Italian, than upon any
other syllable whatever. Their use is, to fami
liarise the Student with the powers and special
peculiarities of the sounds which form the Scale :
and here it is that the arguments of those who
insist upon the use of a ' fixed,' or a ' moveable
Do,' demand our most careful consideration. The
fact that in Italy and France the syllables
Ut (Do), Re, Mi, Fa, Sol, La, Si, are always
applied to the same series of notes, C, D, E, F,
G, A, B, and used as we ourselves use the letters,
exercises no effect whatever upon the question at
issue. It is quite possible for an Italian, or a
Frenchman, to apply the 'fixed Do system' to
his method of nomenclature, and to use the
' moveable Do ' for purposes of Solmisation. The
writer himself, when a child, was taught both
systems simultaneously, by his first instructor,
John Purkis, who maintained, with perfect truth,
that each had its own merits, and each its own
faults. In matters relating to absolute pitch, the
fixed Do is all that can be desired. The ' moveable
Do ' ignores the question of pitch entirely ; but
it calls the Student's attention to the peculiar
functions attached to the several Degrees of the
Scale so clearly, that, in a very short time, he
learns to distinguish the Dominant, the Sub-
Mediant, the Leading-Note, or any other Interval
of any given Key, without the possibility of mis
take, and that, by simply sol-faing the passage in
the usual manner.
The following example shows the first phrase
of the 'Old Hundredth Psalm,' transposed into
different Keys, with the Solmisation proper to both
the fixed and the moveable Do.
(a) Moveable Do.
1
Do Do
Si La Sol Do Be Mi
Moveable Do.
Do Do SI La Sol Do Be Mi
(c) Moveable Do.
^=.
Do Do 8i La Sol Do
(d) Fixed Do.
Be
Mi
(e) Fixed Do.
Fa
Fa Be
=3P
Mi Do
Fa
Sol La.
This example has been so arranged as to bring
into prominent notice one of the strongest objec
tions that has ever been brought against the use
of the fixed Do. The system makes no provision
for the indication of Flats or Sharps. Sol repre
sents G d in the last division of our example, and
G % in the last but one. In a tract published at
Venice, in I746,1 an anonymous member of the
Roman Academy called 'Arcadia,' proposed to
remove the difficulty, by adding to the seven
recognised syllables five others, designed to repre
sent the Sharps and Flats most frequently used ;
viz. Pa (CJ, DtO, Bo (DJf, Eb), Tu (Fjf, Gt>),
De (Gff, Ab), No (Afl, Bb). This method was
adopted by Hasse, and highly approved by Giam-
battista Mancini : but, in 1 768, a certain Signer
Serra endeavoured to supersede it by a still more
numerous collection of syllables ; using Ca, Da,
Ae, Fa, Ga, A, JBa, to represent the seven natural
notes, A, B, C, D, E, F, G ; Ce, De, E, Fe, Ge,
Ao, Be, to represent the same notes, raised by a
series of Sharps ; and Ci, Di, Oe, Ft, Gi, Au, Bi,
to represent them, when lowered by Flats.
None of these methods remained long in use;
but the defect has not been forgotten; and, in
1880, Dr. Hullah endeavoured to remedy it by
retaining the orthodox series of syllables for the
natural notes, and adopting modified sounds for
the sharps and flats, as shown under the head of
SOLFA. [W.S.R.]
SOLO (Ital. ' alone '). A piece or passage ex
ecuted by one voice or performer. Airs are
solos ; a pianoforte piece for 2 hands is a piano
forte solo. A violin solo, strictly speaking, is a
piece for the violin alone, like Bach's unaccom
panied sonatas ; but the term is often used loosely
for a concerto or other piece in which the solo
instrument is accompanied by the band, the
pianoforte, etc.
In an orchestral piece where one instrument
has a passage which is intended to sound out
prominently, it is marked ' Solo,' as in the second
subject of the Adagio in Beethoven's Symphony
no. 4, which is for the 1st clarinet, and marked
Solo ; in the flute solo near the end of the work
ing-out in the Leonora Overture (where, however,
the bassoon, equally solo, is merely marked ' I.');
and in a thousand other instances. In arrange
ments of pianoforte concertos for 2 hands, the
entry of the solo instrument is marked Solo, to
distinguish it from the compressed accompani
ment. [G.]
SOLO ORGAN, a manual or clavier of an
organ having stops associated with it which for
the most part are intended for use solo, that is,
in single notes as opposed to chords. The solo
organ is generally a fourth manual placed above
that of the swell ; but it occasionally supersedes
the choir organ, and is then placed below the
1 Riflessionl sopra alia maggior facilita che trorasl nel apprentice
11 canto, etc.. etc. (Veiiezia, 1746.)
SOLO ORGAN.
'Great' manual. The stops in a solo organ are
most frequently (i) Flutes of 8 ft. and 4 ft.;
(2) A. stop of clarinet-tone ; (3) a stop of oboe-
tone (orchestral oboe) ; (4) Reeds of 8 ft. and
4 ft. of trumpet-tone (tromba, tuba, etc. ). Larger
solo organs contain also stops imitative of the
violin, horn, piccolo, and other instruments ; per
haps also an open diapason, and, in a few cases, a
carillon or glockenspiel. The solo trumpet-stops
are most frequently on a heavy pressure of wind,
and in order to obtain special brilliancy are some
times 'harmonic,' as are also the flutes ; that is,
they have tubes of twice the ordinary length,
pierced with a small hole at their half length.
Some of the stops of a solo organ are often used
in chords, such for instance as flutes and reeds.
This is most commonly done by means of a
coupler ' Solo to Great,' by which the diapason
or flute tones of the solo organ can be used as
a valuable reinforcement of the foundation stops
of the Great manual ; and the tone of the full
Great organ can be similarly enriched by coupling
the solo reeds. In instruments which contain a
Vox humana, that stop is perhaps more often
found associated with the Swell-manual than with
the Solo-manual ; but when placed on the solo
organ its pipes are generally shut up in a separate
box with Venetian shutters worked by a second
swell-pedal. When composition-pedals are made
to act upon the Swell, Great, and Choir organs, it
is evidently wise to make the combinations they
produce proceed as gradually as possible from
piano to fortissimo. But this simple principle is
not applicable to the combinations or rather
selections of solo stops which are made by means
of composition-pedals or pistons. The difficulty
seems however to be overcome by a method sug
gested some years ago by the writer of this article ;
namely, to arrange them in the order in which
the instruments are found in a modern full-score.
Thus, six combination-pedals would act on the
solo-stops hi the following system :— •
(1) Stops of Flute-tone.
(2) Stops of Oboe-tone.
(3) Stops of Clarinet and Bassoon tones.
(4) Stops of Horn-tone.
(5) Stops of Trumpet and Trombone tones.
(6) Stops of Violin and Viola tones.
This method, which is at once simple and ex
haustive, might be indefinitely extended ; thus
for example, a carillon, drum, or triangle, would
be produced by a composition-pedal or piston
Vying between the trumpet stops and violin stops ;
and a vox humana would naturally follow after
stops of the violin-tone. Smaller solo organs
would probably be easily brought under control
by combination-pedals or pistons acting on
(1) Flute.
(2) Oboe.
(3) Clarinet.
(4) Trumpet.
The Solo organ is an introduction of modern
times, and followed naturally upon the inven
tion of pipes closely imitating the tones of or
chestral instruments. [J.S.]
SON A XD STRANGER, THE. 553
SOLO STOP, (i) A stop or register of a solo
organ or fourth manual. (2) Any stop which can
be used as a solo — that is, in single notes, e. g, a
clarinet on the choir organ ; a cornopean, haut
boy, or other reed on the swell organ ; a clara-
bella or flute on either of the three manuals
great, swell, or choir. The name Solo stop does
not necessarily imply that full chords may not be
used upon it. [See SOLO ORGAN.] [J.S.]
SOLOMON. An oratorio of Handel's ; com
posed between 'Alexander Balus' and 'Theodora.'
It was begun on May 5, 1 748, and the memoran
dum at the end of the work is 'G. F. Handel,
Juin 13, 1748, aetatis63. Vo'llig geendiget.' The
words of the oratorio are supposed to be by
Dr. Morell ; but this is not certain. It was pro
duced at Covent Garden theatre, March 17,
1749, ' with a Concerto,' and was revived by Sir
G. Smart at Exeter Hall, April 14, 1836. The
Sacred Harmonic Society followed, Dec. 3, 1838;
and with Costa's additional accompaniments,
April 8, 1870. [G.]
SOMBREE. Voix sombrte is the French
term for the veiled voice or voce velata, in con
tradistinction to the voix claire. [See VEILED
VOICE.] [G.]
SOMIS, GIOVANNI BATTISTA, violinist, was
born in Piedmont in 1676. He studied first under
Corelli at Rome, and afterwards under Vivaldi
at Venice. After his return to Turin he was
appointed solo violinist to the King, and leader of
the royal band, a position he retained until his
death, which occurred in 1763. After having
once settled at Turin he appears scarcely ever to
have left it ; and since only a single composition
of his, a set of sonatas, has been published, there
are no means of directly forming an estimate of
him as a player ; but judging from the style
of his numerous and well-known pupils, Somis
did not merely hand on the traditions of the
great Italian masters, but formed a style of his
own, more brilliant and more emotional, marking
technically, and also, in a sense, musically, a
decided forward step in the art of playing the
violin. As the head and founder of the Pied-
montese School, and the teacher of Leclair, Giar-
dini, Chiabran and Pugnani — the latter again the
teacher of Viotti — he occupies a prominent place
in the history of violin-playing, and forms the
connecting link between the classical schools of
Italy and France. Fetis names as his only pub
lished work ' Opera prima di sonate a violino e
violoncello o cembalo. Roma 1722.' [P-D-]
SOMMEROPHONE. An instrument of the
saxhorn or bombardon class, named after its in
ventor. It will be remembered as largely played
in the Crystal Palace of 1851. 'The Euphonic
horn of Herr Sommer' is honourably mentioned
in the Reports of the Juries (pp. 331, 335) as 'an
instrument of great power as well as sweetness of
tone.' It possessed no very special peculiarities,
and is now seldom, if ever, used. [W.H.S,]
SON AND STRANGER, THE. The title
of the English version, by H. F. Chorley, of
554 SON AND STRANGER, THE.
Mendelssohn's 'Heimkehr aus der Fremde' (Re
turn from abroad), produced at the Haymarket
Theatre, London, July 7, 1851.
The original piece was by Klingemann, and
was written and composed in London between
Sept. 10 and Oct. 4, 1829, for the silver wedding
of Mendelssohn's parents on the following Dec.
26. The parts were cast as follows : — Lisbeth,
Rebecka; Kauz, Devrient ; Hermann, Mantius ;
and the Mayor, Hensel, for whom a part was
written all on one note, F — which however he
could not catch. [G.]
SONATA. The history of the Sonata is the
history of an attempt to cope with one of the
most singular problems ever presented to the
mind of man, and its solution is one of the most
successful achievements of his artistic instincts. A
Sonata is, as its name implies, a sound-piece, and
a sound-piece alone : in its purest and most per
fect examples, it is unexplained by title or text,
and unassisted by voices ; it is nothing but an
unlimited concatenation of musical notes. Such
notes have individually no significance ; and even
the simplest principles of their relative definition
and juxtaposition, such as is necessary to make the
most elementary music, had to be drawn from the
inner self and the consciousness of things which
belong to man's nature only, without the possi
bility of finding guidance or more than the
crudest suggestion from the observation of things
external. Y et the structural principles by which
euch unpromising materials become intelligible
Lave been so ordered and developed by the un
aided musical instinct of many successive gener
ations of composers, as to render possible long
works which not only penetrate and stir us in
detail, but are in their entire mass direct, con
sistent, and convincing. Such works, in their
completest and most severely abstract forms, are
Sonatas.
The name seems to have been first adopted
purely as the antithesis to Cantata, the musical
piece that was sung. It begins to come into notice
about the same time as that form of composition,
soon after the era of the most marked revolution
in music, which began at the end of the sixteenth
century; when a band of enthusiasts, led by
visionary ideals, unconsciously sowed the seed of
true modern music in an attempt to wrest the
monopoly of the art in its highest forms from
the predominant influence of the church, and
to make it serve for the expression of human
feelings of more comprehensive range. At this
time the possibilities of polyphony in its eccle
siastical forms may well have seemed almost
exhausted, and men turned about to find new
fields which should give scope for a greater num
ber of workers. The nature of their speculations
and the associations of the old order of things
alike conspired to direct their attention first to
Opera and Cantata, and here they had some
thing to guide them; but for abstract instru
mental music of the Sonata kind they had for
a long time no clue. The first suggestion was
clearly accidental. It appears probable that the
excessive elaboration of the Madrigal led to the .
SONATA.
practice of accompanying the voice parts with
viols; and from this the step is but short to
leaving the viols by themselves and making a
vague kind of chamber music without the voices.
This appears to have been the source of the in
strumental Cauzonas which were written in
tolerable numbers till some way into the eigh
teenth century. It does not appear that any
distinct rules for their construction were recog
nised, but the examination of a large number,
written at different periods from Frescobaldi to
J. S. Bach, proves the uniform object of the com
posers to have been a lax kind of fugue, such as
might have served in its main outlines for the
vocal madrigals. Burney says the earliest ex
amples of 'sonatas ' he had been able to discover in
his devoted enquiries were by Turini, published
at Venice in 1624. His description of those he
examined answers perfectly to the character of
the canzonas, for, he says, they consist of one
movement, in fugue and imitation throughout.
Sonatas did not, however, rest long at this point
of simplicity, but were destined very early to
absorb material from other sources ; and though
the canzona kind of movement maintained its
distinct position through many changes in its
environment, and is still found in the Violin
Sonatas of J. S. Bach, Handel and Porpora, the
madrigal, which was its source, soon ceased to
have direct influence upon three parts of the more
complete structure. The suggestion for these
came from the dance, and the newly-invented
opera or dramatic cantata. The former had
existed and made the chief staple of instrumental
music for generations, but it requires to be well
understood that its direct connection with dancing
puts it out of the category of abstract music of the
kind which was now obscurely germinating. The
dances were understood through their relation
with one order of dance motions. There would
be the order of rhythmic motions which taken
together was called a Branle, another that was
called a Pa van, another a Gigue ; and each dance-
tune maintained the distinctive rhythm and style
throughout. On the oth^r hand, the radical prin
ciple of the Sonata, developed in the course of
generations, is the compounding of a limitless
variety of rhythms ; and though isolated passages
may be justly interpreted as representing gestures
of an ideal dance kind, like that of the ancients,
it is not through this association that the group of
movements taken as a whole is understood, but by
the disposition of such elements and others in rela
tion to one another. This conception took time to
develop, though it is curious how early composers
began to perceive the radical difference between the
Suite and the Sonata. Occasionally a doubt seems
to be implied by confusing the names together or
by actually calling a collection of dance-tunes a
sonata ; but it can hardly be questioned that
from almost the earliest times, as is proved by a
strong majority of cases, there was a sort of un
defined presentiment that their developments lay
along totally different paths. In the first attempts
to form an aggregate of distinct movements, the
composers had to take their forms where they
SONATA.
could find them; and among these were the
familiar dance-tunes, which for a long while held
a prominent position in the heterogeneous group
of movements, and were only in late times trans
muted into the Scherzo which supplanted the
Minuet and Trio in one case, and the Finale or
Hondo, which ultimately took the place of the
Gigue, or Chaconne, or other similar dance-forms
as the last member of the group.
The third source, as above mentioned, was the
drama, and from this two general ideas were de
rivable : one from the short passages of instru
mental prelude or interlude, and the other from the
vocal portions. Of these, the first was intelligible
in the drama through its relation to some point in
the story, but it also early attained to a crude
condition of form which was equally available
apart from the drama. The other produced at
first the vaguest and most rhapsodical of all the
movements, as the type taken was the irregular
declamatory recitative which appears to have
abounded in the early operas.
It is hardly likely that it will ever be ascer
tained who first experimented in sonatas of
several distinct movements. Many composers
are mentioned in different places as having con
tributed works of the kind, such as Farina, Cesti,
Graziani, among Italians, Rosenmuller among
Germans, and John Jenkins among Englishmen.
Burney also mentions a Michael Angelo Rossi,
•whose date is given as from about 1620 to 1660.
An Andante and Allegro by him, given in
Pauer's Alte Meister, require notice parenthe
tically as presenting a curious puzzle, if the dates
are correct and the authorship rightly attributed.
Though belonging to a period considerably before
Corelli, they show a state of form which certainly
Was not commonly realised till more than a
hundred years later. The distribution of subject-
matter and key, and the clearness with which
they are distinguished, are like the works of
the middle of the I8th rather than the I7th cen
tury, and they belong absolutely to the Sonata
order, and the conscious style of the later period.
But as these stand alone it is not safe to infer
anything from them. The actual structure of
large numbers of sonatas composed in different
parts of Europe soon after this time, proves a
tolerably clear consent as to the arrangement
and quality of the movements. A fine vigorous
example is a Sonata in C minor for violin and
figured bass, by H. J. F. Biber, a German,
said to have been first published in 1681.
This consists of five movements in alternate slow
and quick time. The first is an introductory
Largo of contrapuntal character, with clear and
consistent treatment in the fugally imitative
manner ; the second is a Passacaglia, which
answers roughly to a continuous string of varia
tions on a short well-marked period ; the third is a
rhapsodical movement consisting of interspersed
portions of Poco lento, Presto, and Adagio, leading
into a Gavotte ; and the last is a further rhapso
dical movement alternating Adagio and Allegro.
In this group the influence of the madrigal or
canzona happens to be absent ; the derivation of
SONATA.
555
the movements being — in the first the contra-
puntalism of the music of the church, in the
second and fourth, dances, and in the third and
fifth probably operatic or dramatic declamation.
The work is essentially a violin sonata with accom
paniment, and the violin-part points to the extra
ordinarily rapid advance to mastery which was
made in the few years after its being accepted
as an instrument fit for high-class music. The
writing for the instrument is decidedly elaborate
and difficult, especially in the double stops and
contrapuntal passages which were much in vogue
with almost all composers from this time till
J. S. Bach. In the structure of the movements
the fugal influences are most apparent, and there
are very few signs of the systematic repetition
of subjects in connection with well-marked dis
tribution of keys, which in later times became
indispensable.
Similar features and qualities are shown in the
curious set of seven Sonatas for Clavier by Johann
Kuhnau, called ' Frische Clavier Friichte,' etc.,
of a little later date ; but there are also in
some parts indications of an awakening sense of
the relation and balance of keys. The grouping
of the movements is similar to those of Biber,
though not identical ; thus the first three
have five movements or divisions, and the re
mainder four. There are examples of the same
kind of rhapsodical slow movements, as may be
seen in the Sonata (No. 2 of the set) which is
given in Pauer's Alte Meister ; there are several
fugal movements, some of them clearly and
musically written ; and there are some good illus
trations of dance types, as in the last movement
of No. 3, and the Ciaccona of No. 6. But more
important for the thread of continuous develop
ment are the peculiar attempts to balance toler
ably defined and distinct subjects, and to distribute
key and subject in large expanses, of which there
are at least two clear examples. In a considerable
proportion of the movements the most noticeable
method of treatment is to alternate two character
istic groups of figures or subjects almost through
out, in different positions of the scale and at
irregular intervals of time. This is illustrated in
the first movement of the Sonata No. 2, in the first
movement of No. I, and in the third movement
of No. 5. The subjects in the last of these are
as follows : —
The point most worth notice is that the device
lies half-way between fugue and true sonata-form.
The alternation is like the recurrence of subject
and countersubject in the former, wandering
hazily in and out, and forwards and backwards,
between nearly allied keys, as would be the case
in a fugue. But the subjects are not presented in
556
SONATA.
single parts or fugally answered. They enter and
re-enter for the most part as concrete lumps of har
mony, the harmonic accompaniment of the melody
being taken as part of the idea; and this is essen
tially a quality of sonata-form. So the move
ments appear to hang midway between the two
radically distinct domains of form ; and while de
riving most of their disposition from the older
manners, they look forward, though obscurely, in
the direction of modern practices. How obscure
the ideas of the time on the subject must have
been, appears from the other point which has been
mentioned above; which is, that in a few cases
Kuhnau has hit upon clear outlines of tonal form.
In the second Sonata, for instance, there are two
Arias, as they are called. They do not correspond
in the least with modern notions of an aria any
more than do the rare examples in Bach's and
Handel's Suites. The first is a little complete piece
of sixteen bars, divided exactly into halves by a
double bar, with repeats after the familiar manner.
The first half begins in F and ends in C, the second
half goes as far as D minor and back, to conclude
in F again. The subject-matter is irregularly
distributed in the parts, and does not make any
pretence of coinciding with the tonal divisions.
The second Aria is on a different plan, and is one
of the extremely rare examples in this early period
of clear coincidence between subject and key.
It is in the form which is often perversely mis
named 'lied-form,' which will in this place be
called 'primary form' to avoid circumlocution
and waste of space. It consists of twenty bars in
D minor representing one distinct idea, complete
with close : then sixteen bars devoted to a different
subject, beginning in Bb and passing back ulti
mately to D minor, recapitulating the whole of the
first twenty bars in that key, and emphasising
the close by repeating the last four bars. Such
decisiveness, when compared with the unregulated
and unbalanced wandering of longer movements,
either points to the conclusion that composers did
not realise the desirableness of balance in coinci
dent ranges of subject and key on a large scale ;
or that they were only capable of feeling it in short
and easily grasped movements. It seems highly
probable that their minds, being projected towards
the kind of distribution of subject which ob
tained in fugal movements, were not on the look
out for effects of the sonata order which to moderns
appear so obvious. So that, even if they had been
capable of realising them more systematically they
would not yet have thought it worth while to apply
their knowledge. In following the devolopment
of Sonata, it ought never to be forgotten that com
posers had no idea whither they were tending,
and had to use what they did know as stepping-
stones to the unknown. In art, each step that is
gained opens a fresh vista; but often, till the new
position is mastered, what lies beyond is completely
hidden and undreamed of. In fact, each step is
not so much a conquest of new land, as the crea
tion of a new mental or emotional position in the
human organism. The achievements of art are
the unravellings of hidden possibilities of abstract
law, through the constant and cumulative exten-
SONATA.
sion of instincts. They do not actually exist till
man has made them ; they are the counterpart of
his internal conditions, and change and develop
with the changes of his mental powers and sen
sitive qualities, and apart from him have no
validity. There is no such thing as leaping across
a chasm on to a new continent, neither is there
any gulf fixed anywhere, but continuity and in
evitable antecedents to every consequent ; the roots
of the greatest masterpieces of modern times lie
obscurely hidden in the wild dances and barbarous
howlings of the remotest ancestors of the race,
who began to take pleasure in rhythm and sound,
and every step was into the unknown, or it may
be better said not only unknown but non-existent
till made by mental effort. The period from about
1600 to about 1725 contains the very difficult
steps which led from the style appropriate to a
high order of vocal music — of which the manner
of speech is polyphonic, and the ideal type of
form, the fugue — to the style appropriate to ab
stract instrumental music, of which the best man
ner is contrapuntally expressed harmony, and tho
ideal type of form, the Sonata. These works of
Kuhnau's happen to illustrate very curiously the
transition in which a true though crude idea of
abstract music seems to have been present in the
composer's mind, at the same time that his distri
bution of subjects and keys was almost invariably
governed by fugal habits of thinking, even where
the statement of subjects is in a harmonic manner.
In some of these respects he is nearer and in some
further back from the true solution of the problem
than his famous contemporary Corelli; but his
labours do not extend over so much space nor
had they so much direct and widespread influ
ence. In manner and distribution of movements
they are nearer to his predecessor and compatriot
Biber ; and for that reason, and also to maintain
the continuity of the historic development after
Corelli, the consideration of his works has been
taken a little before their actual place in point
of time.
The works of Corelli form one of the most
familiar landmarks in the history of music,
and as they are exclusively instrumental it is
clear that careful consideration ought to elicit
a great deal of interesting matter, such as must
throw valuable light on the state of thought
of his time. He published no less than sixty
sonatas of different kinds, which are divisible
into distinct groups in accordance with purpose
or construction. The first main division is that
suggested by their titles. There are twenty-four
' Sonate da Chiesa ' for strings, lute, and organ,
twenty-four ' Sonate da Camera ' for the same in
struments, and twelve Solos or Sonatas for violin
and violoncello, or ' cembalo.' In these the first
and simplest matter for observation is the dis
tribution of the movements. The average, in
Church and Chamber Sonatas alike, is strongly
in favour of four, beginning with a slow move
ment, and alternating the rest. There is also
an attempt at balance in the alternation of cha
racter between the movements. The first is
commonly in 4-time, of dignified and solid cha-
SONATA.
racter, and generally aiming less at musical ex
pression than the later movements. The second
movement in the Church Sonata is freely fugal,
in fact the exact type above described as a Can-
zona ; the style is commonly rather dry, and the
general effect chiefly a complacent kind of easy
swing such as is familiar in most of Handel's
fugues. In the Chamber Sonatas the character
of the second movement is rather more variable ;
in some it is an Allemande, which, being dignified
and solid, is a fair counterpart to the Canzona
in the other Sonatas : sometimes it is a Courante,
which is of lighter character. The third move
ment is the only one which is ever in a different
key from the first and last. It is generally a
characteristic one, in which other early composers
of instrumental music, as well as Corelli, clearly
endeavoured to infuse a certain amount of vague
and tender sentiment. The most common time
is 3-2. The extent of the movement is always
limited, and the style, though simply contra
puntal in fact, seems to be ordered with a view
to obtain smooth harmonious full-chord effects,
as a contrast to the brusqueness of the preceding
fugal movement. There is generally a certain
amount of imitation between the parts, irregu
larly and fancifully disposed, but almost always
avoiding the sounding of a single part alone. In
the Chamber Sonatas, as might be anticipated,
the third movement is frequently a Sarabande,
though by no means always ; for the same kind
of slow movement as that in the Church Sonatas
is sometimes adopted, as in the third Sonata of
the Opera Seconda, which is as good an example
of that class as could be taken. The last move
ment is almost invariably of a lively character
in Church and Chamber Sonatas alike. In the
latter, Gigas and Gavottes predominate, the cha
racter of which is so familiar that they need no
description. The last movements in the Church
Sonatas are of a similar vivacity and sprightli-
ness, and sometimes so like in character and
rhythm as to be hardly distinguishable from
dance-tunes, except by the absence of the defin
ing name and the double bar in the middle, and
the repeats which are almost inevitable in the
dance movements. This general scheme is occa
sionally varied without material difference of
principle by the interpolation of an extra quick
movement, as in the first six Sonatas of the Opera
Quinta ; in which it is a sort of show movement
for the violin in a ' Moto continue ' style, added
before or after the central slow movement. In
a few cases the number is reduced to three by
dropping the slow prelude, and in a few others
the order is unsystematisable.
In accordance with the principles of classifi
cation above defined, the Church Sonatas appear
to be much more strictly abstract than those for
Chamber. The latter are, in many cases, not
distinguishable from Suites. The Sonatas of
Opera Quinta are variable. Thus the attractive
Sonata in E minor, No. 8, is quite in the re
cognised suite-manner. Some are like the So-
nate da Chiesa, and some are types of the mixed
order more universally accepted later, having
SONATA.
557
several undefined movements, together with one
dance. The actual structure of the individual
movements is most uncertain. Corelli clearly felt
that something outside the domain of the fugal
tribe was to be attained, but he had no notion
of strict outlines of procedure. One thing which
hampered him and other composers of the early
times of instrumental music was their unwilling
ness to accept formal tunes as an element in
their order of art. They had existed in popular
song and dance music for certainly a century, and
probably much more ; but the idea of adopting
them in high-class music was not yet in favour.
Corelli occasionally produces one, but the fact
that they generally occur with him in Gigas,
which are the freest and least responsible por
tion of the Sonata, supports the inference that
they were not yet regarded as worthy of general
acceptance even if realised as an admissible
element, but could only be smuggled-in in the
least respectable movement with an implied smile
to disarm criticism. Whether this was decisively
so or not, the fact remains that till long after
Corelli's time the conventional tune element was
conspicuously absent from instrumental compo
sitions. Hence the structural principles which
to a modern seem almost inevitable were very
nearly impracticable, or at all events unsuitable
to the general principles of the music of that date.
A modern expects the opening bars of a move
ment to present its most important subject, and
he anticipates its repetition in the latter portion
of the movement as a really vital part of form
of any kind. But association and common sense
were alike against such a usage being universal
in Corelli's time. The associations of ecclesiastical
and other serious vocal music, which were then
preponderant to a supreme degree, were against
strongly salient points, or strongly marked in
terest in short portions of a movement in con
trast to parts of comparative unimportance. Con
sequently the opening bars of a movement would
not be expected to stand out in sufficiently strong
relief to be remembered imless they were re
peated at once, as they would be in fugue.
Human nature is against it. For not only does
the mind take time to be wrought up to a fully
receptive condition, unless the beginning is most
exceptionally striking, but what comes after is
likely to obliterate the impression made by it.
Aa a matter of fact, if all things were equal,
the portion most likely to remain in the mind
of an average listener, is that immediately pre
ceding the strongest cadences or conclusions of
the paragraphs of the movement. It is true, com
posers do not argue in this manner, but they
feel such things vaguely or instinctively, and
generally with more sureness and justice than
the cold-blooded argumentation of a theorist
could attain to. Many examples in other early
composers besides Corelli, emphasise this point
effectively. The earliest attempts at structural
form must inevitably present some simply ex
plicable principle of this sort, which is only not
trivial because it is a very significant as well as
indispensable starting-point. Corelli's commonest
553
SONATA.
devices of form are the most unsophisticated
applications of such simple reasoning. In the
first place, in many movements which are not
fugal, the opening bars are immediately repeated
in another position in the scale, simply and
without periphrasis, as if to give the listener
assurance of an idea of balance at the very out
set. That he did this to a certain extent con
sciously, is obvious from his having employed
the device in at least the following Sonatas—
2, 3, 8, 9, 10, ii, of Opera ima; 2, 4, 7, 8, of
Opera 3za; and 2, 4, 5, and II, of Opera 4ta;
and Tartini and other composers of the same
school followed his lead. This device is not
however either so conspicuous or so common as
that of repeating the concluding passage of the
first half at the end of the whole, or of the con
cluding passages of one half or both consecutively.
This, however, was not restricted to Corelli, but
is found in the works of most composers from his
time to Scarlatti, J. S. Bach and his sons ; and
it is no extravagant hypothesis that its gradual
extension was the direct origin of the character
istic second section and second subject of modern
sonata movements. In many cases it is the only
element of form, in the modern sense, in Corelli' s
movements. In a few cases he hit upon more
complicated principles. The Corrente in Sonata
5 of Opera 4ta, is nearly a miniature of modern
binary form. The well-known Giga in A in
the fifth Sonata of Opera 5ta, has balance of
key in the first half of the movement, modula
tion, and something like consistency to subject-
matter at the beginning of the second half, and due
recapitulation of principal subject-matter at the
end. The last movement of the eighth Sonata
of the Opera Terza, is within reasonable distance
of rondo-form, though this form is generally as
conspicuous for its absence in early sonatas as
tunes are, and probably the one follows as a na
tural consequence of the other. Of the simple
primary form, consisting of corresponding begin
ning and end, and contrast of some sort in the
middle, there is singularly little. The clearest
example is probably the Tempo di Gavotta, which
concludes the ninth Sonata of Opera Quinta. He
also supplies suggestions of the earliest types of
Sonata form, in which both the beginnings and
endings of each half of the movement correspond ;
as this became an accepted principle of structure
with later composers, it will have to be con
sidered more fully in relation to their works.
Of devices of form which belong to the great
polyphonic tribe, Corelli uses many, but with
more musical feeling than learning. His fugues
are not remarkable as fugues, and he uses con
trapuntal imitation rather as a subordinate means
of carrying on the interest, than of expound
ing any wonderful device of pedantic wisdom,
as was too common in those days. He makes
good use of the chaconne-form, which was a
great favourite with the early composers, and
also uses the kindred device of carrying the
repetition of a short figure through the greater
part of a movement in different phases and posi
tions of the scale. In some cases he merely
SOXATA.
rambles on with out any perceptible aim whatever
only keeping up an equable flow of sound with
pleasant interfacings of easy counterpoint, led
on from moment to moment by suspensions
and occasional imitation, and here and there a
helpful sequence. Corelli's position as a com
poser is inseparably mixed up with his position
as one of the earliest masters of his instrument.
His style of writing for it does not appear to
be so elaborate as other contemporaries, both
older and younger, but he grasped a just way
of expressing things with it, and for the most
part the fit things to say. The impression he
made upon musical people in all parts of the
musical world was strong, and he was long re
garded as the most delightful of composers in
his particular line; and though the professors
of his day did not always hold him in so high
estimation, his influence upon many of his most
distinguished successors was unquestionably
powerful.
It is possible, however, that appearances are
deceptive, and that influences of which he was
only the most familiar exponent, are mistaken
for his peculiar achievement. Thus knowing his
position at the head of a great school of violinists,
which continued through several generations
down to Haydn's time, it is difficult to dis
unite him from the honour of having fixed the
type of sonata which they almost uniformly
adopted. And not only this noble and vigorous
school, comprising such men as Tartini, Vivaldi,
Locatelli, Nardini, Veracini, and outlying mem
bers like Le'clair and Rust, but men who were
not specially attached to their violins, such as
Albinoni and Purcell, and later, Bach, Handel
and Porpora, equally adopted the type. Of Albi
noni not much seems to be distinctly known,
except that he was Corelli's contemporary and
probably junior. He wrote operas and instru
mental music. Of the latter, several sonatas are
still to be seen, but they are, of course, not
familiar, though at one time they enjoyed a
wide popularity. The chief point about them
is that in many for violin and figured bass he fol
lows not only the same general outlines, but even
the style of Corelli. He adopts the four-move
ment plan, with a decided canzona in the second
place, a slow movement first and third, and a
quick movement to end with, such as in one case
a Corrente. Purcell's having followed Corelli's
lead is repudiated by enthusiasts; but at all
events the lines of his Golden Sonata in F are
wonderfully similar. There are three slow move
ments, which come first, second, and fourth ; the
third movement is actually called a Canzona;
and the last is a quick movement in 3-8 time,
similar in style to corresponding portions of
Corelli's Sonatas. The second movement, an
Adagio, is the most expressive, being happily
devised on the principle above referred to, of
repeating a short figure in different positions
throughout the movement. In respect of sonata-
form the work is about on a par with the average
of Corelli or Biber.
The domain of Sonata was for a long while
SONATA.
almost monopolised by violinists and writers for
the violin. Some of these, such as Geminiani
and Locatelli, were actually Corelli's pupils.
They clearly followed him both, in style and
structural outlines, but they also began to ex
tend and build upon them with remarkable
speed. The second movement continued for long
the most stationary and conventional, maintain
ing the Canzona type in a loose fugal manner,
by the side of remarkable changes in the other
movements. Of these the first began to grow
into larger dimensions and clearer proportions
even in Corelli's own later works, attaining to
the dignity of double bars and repeats, and with
his successors to a consistent and self-sufficing
form. An example of this is the admirable
Larghetto affettuoso with which Tartini's cele
brated ' Trillo del Diavolo ' commences. No one
who has heard it could fail to be struck with the
force of the simple device above described of
making the ends of each half correspond, as the
passage is made to stand out from all the rest
more characteristically than usual. A similar and
very good example is the introductory Largo to the
Sonata in G minor, for violin and figured bass,
by Locatelli, which is given in Ferdinand David's
'HoheSchuledesViolinspiels.' The subject-mat
ter in both examples is exceedingly well handled,
so that a sense of perfect consistency is main
tained without concrete repetition of subjects,
except, as already noticed, the closing bars of each
half, which in Locatelli's Sonata are rendered
less obvious through the addition of a short coda
starting from a happy interrupted cadence. It
is out of the question to follow the variety of
aspects presented by the introductory slow move
ment; a fair proportion are on similar lines to
the above examples, others are isolated. Their
character is almost uniformly solid and large;
they are often expressive, but generally in a way
distinct from the character of the second slow
movement, which from the first was chosen as
the fittest to admit a vein of tenderer sentiment.
The most important matter in the history of the
Sonata at this period is the rapidity with which
advance was made towards the realisation of
modern harmonic and tonal principles of struc
ture, or, in other words, the perception of the
effect and significance of relations between chords
and distinct keys, and consequent appearance of
regularity of purpose in the distribution of both,
and increased freedom of modulation. Even
Corelli's own pupils show consistent form of the
sonata kind with remarkable clearness. The last
movement of a Sonata in C minor, by Geminiani,
has a clear and emphatic subject to start with ;
modulation to the relative major, Eb, and special
features to characterise the second section ; and
conclusion of the first half in that key, with repeat
after the supposed orthodox manner. The second
half begins with a long section corresponding
to the working out or ' free fantasia ' portion of
a modern sonata movement, and concludes with
recapitulation of the first subject and chief fea
tures of the second section in C minor ; this latter
part differing chiefly from modern ways by ad-
SONATA.
559
mitting a certain amount of discursiveness,
which is characteristic of most of the early ex
periments in this form. Similar to this is the
last movement of Locatelli's Sonata in G minor,
the last movement of Veracini's Sonata in
E minor, published at Vienna in 1714, the last
movements of Tartini's Sonatas in E minor and
minor, and not a few others. It is rather
curious that most of the early examples of what
is sometimes called first-movement form are last
movements. Most of these movements, how
ever, in the early times, are distinguished by a
peculiarity which is of some importance. It has
been before referred to, but is so characteristic
of the process of growth, that it will not be
amiss to describe it in this place. The simple
and almost homely means of producing the effect
of structural balance by making the beginning
and ending of each half of a movement corre
spond, is not so conspicuously common in its
entirety as the correspondence of endings or re
petition of cadence bars only ; but it nevertheless
is found tolerably often, and that in times before
the virtue of a balance of keys in the first half
of the movement had been decisively realised.
When, however, this point was gained, it is clear
that such a process would give, on as minute a
scale as possible, the very next thing to complete
modern binary form. It only needed to expand
the opening passage into a first subject, and the
figures of the Cadence into a second subject, to
attain that type which became almost universal
in sonatas till Haydn's time, and with some
second-rate composers, like Reichart, later. The
movements which are described as binary must
be therefore divided into two distinct classes : —
that in which the first subject reappears in the
complementary key at the beginning of the second
half, which is the almost universal type of earlier
times ; and that in which it appears in the latter
part of the movement, after the working-out
portion, which is the later type. The experi
ments in Corelli and Tartini, and others who
are close to these types, are endless. Sometimes
there are tentative strokes near to the later
form ; sometimes there is an inverted order re
producing the second portion of the movement
first. Sometimes the first subject makes its
appearance at both points, but then, may be,
there is no balance of keys in the first half, and
so forth. The variety is extraordinary, and it ia
most interesting to watch the manner in which
some types by degrees preponderate, some
times by combining with one another, some
times by gradual transformation, come nearer
and more decisively like the types which are
generally adopted in modern times as fittest. The
later type was not decisively fixed on at any par
ticular point, for many early composers touched
it once or twice at the same period that they wer£
writing movements in more elementary forms.
The point of actual achievement of a step in art
is not marked by an isolated instance, but by
decisive preponderance, and by the systematic
adoption which shows at least an instinctive
realisation of its value and importance.
560
SONATA.
These writers of violin sonatas were just
touching on the clear realisation of harmonic
form as accepted in modern times, and they
sometimes adopted the later type, though rarely,
and that obscurely; they mastered the earlier
type, and used it freely ; and they also used the
intermediate type which combines the two, in
which the principal or first subject makes its
appearance both at the beginning of the first
half and near the end, where a modern would
expect it. As a sort of embryonic suggestion of
this, the Tempo di Gavotta, in the eighth Sonata oJ
Corelli's Opera Seconda, is significant. Complete
examples are — the last movement of Tartini's
fourth Sonata of Opus I, and the last movement
of that in D minor above referred to ; the last
movement of Geminiani's Sonata in C minor ; the
main portion, excluding the Coda, of the Corrente
in Vivaldi's Sonata in A major ; the last move
ment of a Sonata of Nardini's, in D major ; and
two Capriccios in Bb and C, by Franz Benda,
quoted in F. David's ' Hohe Schule, ' etc.
The four-movement type of violin sonata was
not invariably adopted, though it preponderates
so conspicuously. There is a set of twelve
sonatas by Locatelli, for instance, not so fine
as that in F. David's collection, which are
nearly all on an original three-movement plan,
concluding with an 'Aria' and variations on a
ground-bass. Some of Tartini's are also in three
movements, and a set of six by Nardini are also
in three, but always beginning with a slow move
ment, and therefore, though almost of the same
date, not really approaching the distribution
commonly adopted by Haydn for Clavier Sonatas.
In fact the old Violin Sonata is in many respects
a distinct genus, which maintained its individu
ality alongside the gradually stereotyped Clavier
Sonata, and only ceased when that type obtained
possession of the field, and the violin was re-
introduced, at first as it were furtively, as an
accompaniment to the pianoforte. The general
characteristics of this school of writers for the
violin, were nobility of style and richness of
feeling, an astonishing mastery of the instru
ment, and a rapidly-growing facility in dealing
with structure in respect of subject, key, modu
lation and development; and what is most
vital, though less obvious, a perceptible growth
in the art of expression and a progress towards
the definition of ideas. As a set-off there are
occasional traces of pedantic manners, and occa
sional crudities both of structure and expression,
derived probably from the associations of the old
music which they had so lately left behind them.
At the crown of the edifice are the Sonatas of
J. S. Bach. Of sonatas in general he appears not
to have held to any decisive opinion. He wrote
many for various instruments, and for various
combinations of instruments. For clavier, for
violin alone, for flute, violin, and clavier, for
viol da gamba and clavier, and so on; but in
most of these the outlines are not decisively dis
tinct from Suites. In some cases the works are
described as 'Sonatas or Suites,' and in at least
one case the introduction to a church cantata
SONATA.
is called a Sonata. Some instrumental works
which are called Sonatas only, might quite as
well be called Suites, as they consist of a pre
lude and a set of dance-tunes. Others are hete
rogeneous. From this it appears that he had
not satisfied himself on what lines to attack the
Sonata in any sense approaching the modern
idea. With the Violin Sonatas it was other
wise; and in the group of six for violin and
clavier he follows almost invariably the main
outlines which are characteristic of the Italian
school descended from Corelli, and all but one are
on the four-movement plan, having slow move
ments first and third, and quick movements
second and fourth. The sixth Sonata only differs
from the rest by having an additional quick
movement at the beginning. Not only this
but the second movements keep decisively the
formal lineaments of the ancient type of free
fugue, illustrated with more strictness of manner
by the Canzonas. Only in calibre and quality
of ideas, and in some peculiar idiosyncrasies of
structure do they differ materially from the
works of the Italian masters. Even the first,
third, and fifth Sonatas in the other set of
six, for violin alone, conform accurately to the
old four-movement plan, including the fugue
in the second place ; the remaining three being
on the general lines of the Suite. In most of
the Sonatas for violin and clavier, the slow
movement is a tower of strength, and strikes
a point of rich and complex emotional expression
which music reached for the first time in Bach's
imagination. His favourite way of formulating
a movement of this sort, was to develop the
whole accompaniment consistently on a concise
and strongly-marked figure, which by repetition
in different conditions formed a bond of con
nection throughout the whole ; and on this
he built a passionate kind of recitative, a free
and unconstrained outpouring of the deepest and
noblest instrumental song. This was a sort of
apotheosis of that form of rhapsody, which has
been noticed in the early Sonatas, such as Biber's
and Kuhnau's, and was occasionally attempted
by the Italians. The six Sonatas present diver
sities of types, all of the loftiest order; some
of them combining together with unfailing ex
pressiveness perfect specimens of old forms of
contrapuntal ingenuity. Of this, the second
movement of the second Sonata is a perfect
example. It appears to be a pathetic colloquy
between the violin and the treble of the clavier
part, to which the bass keeps up the slow con
stant motion of staccato semiquavers: the
colloquy at the same time is in strict canon
throughout, and, as a specimen of expressive
treatment of that time-honoured form, is almost
unrivalled.
In all these movements the kinship is rather
with the contrapuntal writers of the past, than
with the types of Beethoven's adoption. Even
Bach, immense as his genius and power of di
vination was, could not leap over that period of
formation which it seems to have been indispen
sable for mankind to pass through, before equally
SONATA.
noble and deeply-felt things could be expressed
in the characteristically modern manner. Though
he looked further into the future in matters of
expression and harmonic combination than any
composer till the present century, he still had to
use forms of the contrapuntal and fugal order
for the expression of his highest thoughts. He
did occasionally make use of binary form, though
not in these Sonatas. But he more commonly
adopted, and combined with more or less fugal
treatment, an expansion of simple primary form
to attain. structural effect. Thus, in the second
movements of the first and second Sonatas, in
the last of the third and sixth, and the first of
the sixth, he marks first a long complete section
in his principal key, then takes his way into
modulations and development, and discussion of
themes and various kinds of contrapuntal enjoy
ment, and concludes with simple complete re
capitulation of the first section in the principal
key. Bach thus stands singularly aside from
the direct line of the development of the Sonata
as far as the structural elements are concerned.
His contributions to the art of expression, to the
development of resource, and to the definition
and treatment of ideas had great effect, and are
of the very highest importance to instrumental
music ; but his almost invariable choice of either
the suite-form, or the accepted outlines of the
violin sonata, in works of this class, caused him
to diverge into a course which with him found
its final and supreme limit. In order to con
tinue the work in veins which were yet unex
hausted, the path had to be turned a little, and
joined to courses which were coming up from
other directions. The violin sonata continued
to make its appearance here and there as has
already been mentioned, but in the course of
a generation it was entirely supplanted by the
distinct type of clavier sonata.
Meanwhile there was another composer of this
time, who appears to stand just as singularly
apart from the direct high road as Bach, and
who, though he does not occupy a pedestal so
high in the history of art, still has a niche
by no means low or inconspicuous, and one
which he shares with no one. Domenico Scar
latti was Bach's senior by a few years, though
not enough to place him in an earlier musical
generation ; and in fact though his works are
so different in quality, they have the stamp that
marks them as belonging to the same parallel of
time.
His most valuable contributions are in the
immense number of sonatas and studies which
he wrote for the harpsichord. The distinction
between Study and Sonata is not clearly marked
with him ; it looks as if one included the other
in most cases, for the structure and style vary
very little, and not necessarily or systematically
at all, between one and the other. But whatever
they are called they do not correspond in appear
ance to any form which is commonly supposed to
be essential to the Sonata. Neither can they
be taken as pure-bred members of the fugal
family, nor do they trace their origins to the Suite.
VOL. in. PT. 5.
SONATA.
561
They are in fact, in a fair proportion of cases, an
attempt to deal with direct ideas in a modern
sense, without appealing to the glamour of con
scious association, the dignity of science, or the
familiarity of established dance rhythms. The
connection with what goes before and with what
comes after is alike obscure, because of the daring
originality with which existing materials are
worked upon; but it is not the less inevitably
present, as an outline of his structural principles
will show.
His utterance is at its best sharp and incisive ;
the form in which he loves to express himself is
epigrammatic ; and some of his most effective
sonatas are like strings of short propositions
bound together by an indefinable sense of consis
tency and consequence, rather than by actual
development. These ideas are commonly brought
home to the hearer by the singular practice of
repeating them consecutively as they stand, often
several times over ; in respect of which it is worth
remembering that his position in relation to his
audience was not unlike that of an orator addressing
an uncultivated mob. The capacity for appreciating
grand developments of structure was as unde
veloped in them as the power of following widely-
spread argument and conclusion would be in the
mob. And just as the mob-orator makes his most
powerful impressions by short direct statements,
and by hammering them in while still hot from
his lips, so Scarlatti drove his points home by
frequent and generally identical reiterations ; and
then when the time came round to refer to them
again, the force of the connection between distant
parts of the same story was more easily grasped.
The feeling that he did this with his eyes open is
strengthened by the fact that even in the grouping
of the reiterations there is commonly a perceptible
method. For instance, it can hardly be by acci
dent that at a certain point of the movement, after
several simple repetitions, he should frequently
resort to the complication of repeating several
small groups within the repetition of large ones.
The following example is a happy illustration of
his style, and of his way of elaborating such
repetitions.
-*- «—«-•-«
r -BBS U ; I
^•uui ^.^Lgiij
Oo
662
SONATA.
It must not be supposed that he makes a law
of this procedure, but the remarkably frequent
occurrence of so curious a device is certainly sug
gestive of conscious purpose in structural treat
ment. The result of this mode is that the move
ments often appear to be crowded with ideas.
Commonly the features of the opening bars, which
in modern times would be held of almost supreme
importance, serve for very little except to deter
mine the character of the movement, and often
never make their appearance again. On the other
hand he carries the practice before referred to, of
making the latter part of each half of the move
ment correspond, to an extraordinary pitch, and
with perfect success ; for he almost invariably
adopts the key distribution of binary form in its
main outlines ; and though it would not be accu
rate to speak of such a thing as a 'second subject'
in his sonatas, the impression produced by his
distribution of repetition and the clearness of his
ideas is sufficient, in his best movements, to give
a general structural effect very similar to com
plete binary form on a small scale. In order to
realise to what extent the process of recapitulation
is carried by him, it will be as well to consider
the outline of a fairly characteristic sonata.
That which stands fifteenth in the easily avail
able edition of Breitkopf & Hartel commences
with eight bars only in E minor ; the next forty-
six, barring merely a slight and unimportant di
gression, are in G major. This concludes the first
half. The second half begins with reference to the
opening figures of the whole and a little key
digression, and then a characteristic portion of
the second section of the first half is resumed, and
the last thirty- four bars of the movement are a
recapitulation in E minor of the last thirty-five
of the first half, the three concluding bars being
condensed into two.
In many respects his principles of structure
and treatment are altogether in the direction of
modern ways, and alien to fugal principles. That
vital principle of the fugue — the persistence of one
principal idea, and the interweaving of it into
every part of the structure — appears completely
alien to Scarlatti's disposition. He very rarely
wrote a fugue ; and when he did, if it was success
ful that waj less because it was a good fugue
SONATA.
than because it was Scarlatti's. The fact that
he often starts with imitation between two parts
is unimportant, and the merest accident of associ
ation. He generally treats his ideas as concrete
lumps, and disposes them in distinct portions of
the movement, which is essentially an unfugal
proceeding ; but the most important matter is
that he was probably the first to attain to clear
conception and treatment of a self-sufficing effec
tive idea, and to use it, if without science, yet
with management which is often convincingly
successful. He was not a great master of the art
of composition, but he was one of the rarest
masters of his instrument ; and his divination of
the way to treat it, and the perfect adaptation of
his ideas to its requirements, more than counter
balance any shortcoming in his science. He was
blessed with ideas, and with a style so essentially
his own, that even when his music is transported
to another instrument the characteristic effects
of tone often remain unmistakeable. Vivacity,
humour, genuine fun, are his most familiar traits.
At his best his music sparkles with life and fresh
ness, and its vitality is apparently quite unim
paired by age. He rarely approaches tenderness or
sadness, and in the whole mass of his works there
are hardly any slow movements. He is not a
little ' bohemian,' and seems positively to revel in
curious effects of consecutive fifths and consecutive
octaves. The characteristic daring of which such
things are the most superficial manifestations,
joined with the clearness of his foresight, made
him of closer kinship to Beethoven and Weber,
and even Brahms, than to the typical contrapun-
tali sts of his day. His works are genuine ' sonatas '
in the most radical sense of the term — self-depen
dent and self-sufficing sound-pieces, without pro
gramme. To this the distribution of movements
is at least of secondary importance, and his con
fining himself to one alone does not vitiate his
title to be a foremost contributor to that very im
portant branch of the musical art. No successor
was strong enough to wield his bow. His pupil
Durante wrote some sonatas, consisting of a
Studio and a Divertimento apiece, which have
touches of his manner, but without sufficient of
the nervous elasticity to make them important.
The contemporary writers for clavier of second
rank do not offer much which is of high musical
interest, and they certainly do not arrive at any
thing like the richness of thought and expression
which is shown by their fellows of the violin.
There appears however amongst them a tendency
to drop the introductory slow movement charac
teristic of the violin sonata, and by that means
to draw nearer to the type of later clavier or
pianoforte sonatas. Thus a sonata of Wagenseil s
in F major presents almost exactly the general
outlines to be met with in Haydn's works— an
Allegro assai in binary form of the old type, a
short Andantino grazioso, and a Tempo di Min-
uetto. A sonata of Hasse's in D minor has a
similar arrangement of three movements ending
with a Gigue ; but the first movement is utterly
vague and indefinite in form. There is also
an Allegro of Hasse's in Bb, quoted in Pauers
SONATA.
Alte Meister, which deserves consideration for the
light it throws on a matter which is sometimes
said to be a crucial distinction between the early
attempts at form and the perfect achievement.
In many of the early examples of sonata-form,
the second section of the first part is characterised
by groups of figures which are quite definite
enough for all reasonable purposes, but do not
come up to the ideas commonly entertained of
the nature of a subject ; and on this ground the
settlement of sonata-form was deferred some
fifty yeara. Hasse was not a daring originator,
neither was he likely to strike upon a crucial
test of perfection, yet in this movement he sets
out with a distinct and complete subject in Bb
of a robust Handelian character: —
SONATA.
563
tr
&
a
tr
\
<T=f
3M&$
3
and after the usual extension proceeds to F, and
announces by definite emphasis on the Dominant
the well-contrasted second subject, which is sug
gestive of the polite reaction looming in the
future : —
The movement as a whole is in the binary type
of the earlier kind.
The period now approaching is characterised
by uncertainty in the distribution of the move
ments, but increasing regularity and definition in
their internal structure. Some writers follow the
four-movement type of violin sonata in writing
for the clavier ; some strike upon the grouping of
three movements; and a good many fall back upon
two. A sonata of Galuppi's in D illustrates the
first of these, and throws light upon the transi
tional process. The first movement is a beautiful
Adagio of the Arioso type, with the endings of
each half corresponding, after the manner traced
from Corelli ; the second is an Allegro not of the
fugal or Canzona order, but clear binary of the
older kind. A violin sonata of Locatelli's, of prob
ably earlier date, has an Allemande of excellent
form in this position, but this is not sufficiently
definite in the inference it affords to throw much
light on any transition or assimilation of violin
sonata-form to clavier sonata-form. Galuppi's
adoption of a movement of clear sonata-qualities
in this place supplies exactly the link that was
needed ; and the fugal or canzona type of move
ment being so supplanted, nothing further was
necessary but expansion, and the omission ot
the introductory Adagio (which probably was
not so well adapted to the earlier keyed instru
ments as to the violin), to arrive at the principle
of distribution adopted in the palmiest days of
formalism. Later, with a more powerful instru
ment, the introductory slow movement was often
reintroduced. Galuppi's third movement is in a
solid march style, and the last is a Giga. All of
them are harmonically constructed, and the whole
work is solid and of sterling musical worth.
Dr. Arne was born only four years after Galuppi,
and was amenable to the same general influences.
The structure of his sonatas emphasises the fact
above mentioned, that though the order of move
ments was passing through a phase of uncertainty
their internal structure was growing more and
more distinct and uniform. His first sonata, in F,
has two movements, Andante and Allegro, both
of which follow harmonically the lines of binary
form. The second, in E minor, has three move
ments, Andante, Adagio, Allegrissimo. The first
and last are on the binary lines, and the middle
one in simple primary form. The third Sonata
consists of a long vague introduction of arpeggios,
elaborated in a manner characteristic of the time,
an Allegro which has only one subject but is on
the binary lines, and a Minuet and two Variations.
The fourth Sonata is in some respects the most
interesting. It consists of an Andante, Siciliano,
Fuga, and Allegro. The first is of continuous
character but nevertheless in binary form, with
out the strong emphasis on the points of division
between the sections. It deserves notice for its ex
pressiveness and clearness of thought. The second
movement is very short, but pretty and expressive,
of a character similar to examples of Handel's
tenderer moods. The last movement is particu
larly to be noticed, not only for being decisively
in binary form, but for the ingenuity with which
that form is manipulated. The first section is
represented by the main subject in the treble, the
second (which is clearly marked in the dominant
key) has the same subject in the bass, a device
adopted also more elaborately by W. Friedemann
Bach. The second half begins with consistent
development and modulation, and the recapitula
tion is happily managed by making the main
subject represent both sections at once in a short
passage of canon. Others of Arne's sonatas afford
similar though less clear examples which it is
superfluous to consider in detail, for neither the
matter nor the handling is so good in them as in
those above described, most of which, though not
rich in thought or treatment, nor impressive
Oo2
564-
SONATA.
SONATA.
in character, have genuine traits of musical ex
pression and clearness of workmanship.
In the same year with Dr. Arne was born
Wilhelm Friedemann Bach, the eldest son of
John Sebastian. He was probably the most
gifted, the most independent, and unfortunately
the wildest and most unmanageable of that re
markable family. Few of his compositions are
known, and it is said that he would not take the
trouble to write unless he was driven to it. Two
sonatas exist, which are of different type, and
probably represent different periods of his che
quered career. One in D major, for its richness,
elaborateness, expressiveness, is well worthy of
the scion of so great a stock ; the other is rather
cheap, and though masterly in handling and
disposition of structural elements, has more traces
of the elegance which was creeping over the world
of music than of the grave and earnest nobleness
of his father and similar representatives of the
grand period. The first, in D, is probably the
most remarkable example, before Beethoven, of
original ingenuity manipulating sonata - form
under the influence of fugal associations and by
means of contrapuntal devices. The whole is
worked out with careful and intelligible reasoning,
but to such an elaborate extent that it is quite out
of the question to give even a complete outline of
its contents. The movements are three — Un poco
allegro, Adagio, Vivace. The first and last are
speculative experiments in binary form. The first
half in each represents the balance of expository
sections in tonic and complementary keys. The
main subject of the first reappears in the bass
in the second section, with a new phase of the
original accompaniment in the upper parts. The
development portion is in its usual place, but the
recapitulation is tonallyreversed. The first subject
and section is given in a relative key to balance
the complementary key of the second section, and
the second section is given in the original key or
tonic of the movement ; so that instead of re
peating one section and transposing the other in
recapitulation, they are both transposed analo
gously. In each of the three movements the ends
of the halves correspond, and not only this but
the graceful little figure appended to the cadence
is the same in all the movements, establishing
thereby a very delicate but sensible connection
between them. This figure is as follows : —
The formal pauses on familiar points of har
mony characteristic of later times are conspicu
ously few, the 'main divisions being generally
marked by more subtle means. The whole so
nata is so uncompromisingly full of expressive
figures, and would require to be so elaborately
phrased and 'sung' to be intelligible, that an
adequate performance would be a matter of con
siderable difficulty. The second Sonata, in C, has
quite a different appearance. It is also in three
movements — Allegro, Grave, and Vivace. The
first is a masterly, clear and concise example of
binary form of the type which is more familiar
in the works of Haydn and Mozart. The second
is an unimportant intermezzo leading directly
into the Finale, which is also in binary form
of the composite type. The treatment is the
very reverse of the previous sonata. It is not
contrapuntal, nor fugal. Little pains are taken
to make the details expressive; and the only
result of using a bigger and less careful brush
is to reduce the interest to a minimum, and
to make the genuineness of the utterances seem
doubtful, because the writer appears not to
have taken the trouble to express his best
thoughts.
Wilhelm Friedemann's brother, Carl Philip
Emmanuel, his junior by a few years, was the
member of the younger family who attained the
highest reputation as a representative composer
of instrumental music and a writer on that sub
ject. His celebrity is more particularly based
on the development of sonata-form, of which he
is often spoken of as the inventor. True, his
sonatas and writings obtained considerable cele
brity, and familiarity induced people to remark
things they had overlooked in the works of other
composers. But in fact he is neither the in
ventor nor the establisher of sonata-form. It
was understood before his day, both in de
tails and in general distribution of movements.
One type obtained the reputation of supreme fit
ness later, but it was not nearly always adopted
by Haydn, nor invariably by Mozart, and was
consistently departed from by Beethoven ; and
Emmanuel did not restrict himself to it ; yet
his predecessors used it often. It is evident
therefore that his claims to a foremost place
rest upon other grounds. Among these, most
prominent is his comprehension and employment
of the art of playing and expressing things <
the clavier. He understood it, not in a new
sense, but in one which was nearer to public
comprehension than the treatment of his father.
He grasped the phase to which it had arrived,
by constant development in all quarters; 1
added a little of his own, and having a clear
and ready- working brain, he brought it home to
SONATA.
the musical public in a way they had not felt
before. His influence was paramount to give
a decided direction to clavier-playing, and it is
possible that the style of which he was the
foster-father passed on continuously to the mas
terly treatment of the pianoforte by Clementi,
and through him to the culminating achieve
ments of Beethoven.
In respect of structure, most of his important
sonatas are in three movements, of which the
first and last are quick, and the middle one slow ;
and this is a point by no means insignificant in
the history of the sonata, as it represents a
definite and characteristic balance between the
principal divisions, in respect of style and expres
sion as well as in the external traits of form.
Many of these are in clear binary form, like
those of his elder brother, and his admirable
predecessor, yet to be noted, P. Domenico Para-
dies. He adopts sometimes the old type, di
viding the recapitulation in the second half of
the movement ; sometimes the later, and some
times the composite type. For the most part he
is contented with the opportunities for variety
which this form supplies, and casts a greater
proportion of movements in it than most other
composers, even to the extent of having all move
ments in a work in different phases of the same
form, which in later times was rare. On the
other hand, he occasionally experiments in struc
tures as original as could well be devised. There
is a Sonata in F minor which has three main
divisions corresponding to movements. The first,
an Allegro, approaches vaguely to binary form ;
the second, an Adagio, is in rough outline like
simple primary form, concluding with a curious
barless cadenza ; the last is a Fantasia of the
most elaborate and adventurous description, full
of experiments in modulation, enharmonic and
otherwise, changes of time, abrupt surprises and
long passages entirely divested of bar lines.
There is no definite subject, and no method in
the distribution of keys. It is more like a rhap
sodical improvisation of a most inconsequent and
unconstrained description than the product of
concentrated purpose, such as is generally ex
pected in a sonata movement. This species of
experiment has not survived in high-class mo
dern music, except in the rarest cases. It was
however not unfamiliar in those days, and superb
examples in the same spirit were provided by
John Sebastian, such as the Fantasia Cromatica,
and parts of some of the Toccatas. JohnErnstBach
also left something more after the manner of the
present instance as the prelude to a fugue. Em
manuel Bach's position is particularly emphasised
as the most prominent composer of sonatas of his
time, who clearly shows the tendency of the new
counter-current away from the vigour and honest
comprehensiveness of the great school of which his
father was the last and greatest representative,
towards the elegance, polite ease, and artifir
ciality, which became the almost indispensable
conditions of the art in the latter part of the
1 8th century. Fortunately the process of prop
ping up a tune upon a dummy accompaniment,
SONATA.
565
was not yet accepted universally as a desirable
phenomenon of high-class instrumental music ;
in fact such a stride downward in one genera
tion would have been too cataclystic ; so he was
spared the temptation of shirking honest concen
tration, and padding his works, instead of making
them thoroughly complete; and the result is
a curious combination, sometimes savouring
strongly of his father's style —
etc.
and sometimes coldly predicting the style of the
future —
In general, his building up of movements is full
of expressive detail, and he does not spare him
self trouble in enriching his work with such
things as ingenuity, genuine musical perception
and vivacity of thought can suggest. He occa
sionally reaches a point of tenderness and poetic
sensibility which is not unworthy of his descent,
but there is also sometimes an uncomfortable
premonition in his slow movements of the pos
turing and posing which were soon to be almost
inevitable in well-bred Adagios. The spirit is
indeed not greatly deep and earnest, but in out
ward things the attainment of a rare degree of
point and emphasis, and of clearness and cer
tainty in construction without emptiness, sufficed
to give Philip Emmanuel a foremost place among
the craftsmen of the art.
P. Domenico Paradies was Emmanuel Bach's
senior by a few years. Two of his sonatas, at least,
are deservedly well known to musicians. The
structural qualities shown by the whole set of
twelve, emphasise the opinion that binary form
was familiar to composers of this period. They dif
fer from Philip Emmanuel's chiefly in consisting
uniformly of two movements only. Of these, the
first movements are almost invariably in binary
form. That of the I st sonata is perfectly complete
and of the later type ; many of the others are of
the early type. Some details in the distribution
of the movements are worth noticing. Thus the
last movement of No. 4 is a very graceful and
pretty minuet, which had hitherto not been so
SONATA.
common an ingredient in sonatas as it afterwards
became. The last movement l of No. 3 is called
an aria ; the arrangement of parts of which, as
well as that of the last movement of No. 9, hap
pens to produce a rondo, hitherto an extremely
rare feature. His formulation and arrangement
of subjects is extremely clear and masterly,
and thoroughly in the sonata manner — that is,
essentially harmonical. In character he leans
towards the style of the latter part of the 1 8th
century, but has a grace and sincerity which
is thoroughly his own. In a few cases, as in
the last movements of the Sonatas in A and D,
Nos. 6 and 10, which are probably best known
of all, the character assumed is rather of the
bustling and hearty type which is suggestive
of the influence of Scarlatti. In detail they are
not so rich as the best specimens of Emmanuel's,
or of Friedemann Bach's workmanship ; but they
are thoroughly honest and genuine all through,
and thoroughly musical, and show no sign of
shuffling or laziness.
The two-movement form of clavier sonata, of
which Paradies's are probably the best examples,
seems to have been commonly adopted by a num
ber of composers of second and lower rank, from
his time till far on in the century. Those of
Durante have been already mentioned. All the
set of eight, by Domenico Alberti, are also in
this form, and so are many by such forgotten
contributors as Roeser and Barthelemon, and
some by the once popular Schobert. Alberti is
credited with the doubtful honour of having
invented a formula of accompaniment which be
came a little too familiar in the course of the
century, and is sometimes known as the 'Alberti
Bass.' This specimen is from his 2nd Sonata.
-"F-H -P »-\ —r+- t-Tr^-i etc-ad
influitum.
He may not have invented it, but he certainly
called as much attention to it as he could, since
not one of his eight sonatas is without it, and in
some movements it continues almost throughout.
The movements approach occasionally to binary
form, but are not clearly defined ; the matter
is for the most part dull in spirit, and poor in
sound ; and the strongest characteristic is the
unfortunate one of hitting upon a cheap device,
which was much in vogue with later composers
of mark, without having arrived at that mastery
and definition of form and subject which alone
made it endurable. The times were not quite
ripe for such usages, and it is fortunate for Para-
dies, who was slightly Alberti's junior, that he
should have attained to a far better definition of
structure without resorting to such cheapening.
There are two other composers of this period
who deserve notice for maintaining, even later,
some of the dignity and nobility of style which
were now falling into neglect, together with
clearness of structure and expressiveness of detail.
These are Kolle and George Benda. A sonata
of the former's in Eb shows a less certain hand
i In some modern reprints of this Sonata the order of the move
ments has beeu reversed.
SONATA.
in the treatment of form, but at times extraor
dinary gleams of musically poetic feeling. Points
in the Adagio are not unworthy of kinship with
Beethoven. It contains broad and daring effects
of modulation, and noble richness of sentiment
and expression, which, by the side of the obvious
tendencies of music in these days, is really aston
ishing. The first and last movements are in
binary form of the old type, and contain some
happy and musical strokes, though not so re
markable as the contents of the slow movement.
George Benda was a younger and greater brother
of the Franz who has been mentioned in connec
tion with Violin Sonatas. He was one of the
last writers who, using the now familiar forms,
still retained some of the richness of the earlier
manner. There is in his work much in the
same tone and style as that of Emmanuel Bach,
but also an earnestness and evident willing
ness to get the best out of himself and to deal
with things in an original manner, such as was
by this time becoming rare. After him, com
posers of anything short of first rank offer little
to arrest attention either for individuality in
treatment or earnestness of expression. The
serious influences which had raised so many of
the earlier composers to a point of memorable
musical achievement were replaced by associa
tions of far less genuine character, and the ease
with which something could be constructed in the
now familiar forms of sonata, seduced men into
indolent uniformity of structure and commonplace
prettiness in matter. Some attained to evident
proficiency in the use of instrumental resource,
such as Turini ; and some to a touch of genuine
though small expressiveness, as Haessler and
Grazioli ; for the rest the achievements of Sarti,
Sacchini, Schobert, Me"hul, and the otherwise
great Cherubini, in the line of sonata, do not
offer much that requires notice. They add
nothing to the process of development, and some
of them are remarkably behindhand in relation
to their time, and both what they say and the
manner of it is equally unimportant.
Midway in the crowd comes the conspicuous
form of Haydn, who raised upon the increasingly
familiar structural basis not only some fresh and
notable work of the accepted sonata character, but
the great and enduring monument of his sym
phonies and quartets. The latter do notfall within
the limits of the present subject, though they are
in reality but the great instrumental expansion
of this kind of music for solo instruments. An
arbitrary restriction has been put upon the mean
ing of the word Sonata, and it is necessary here
to abide by it. With Haydn it is rather sonata-
form which is important, than the works which
fall under the conventional acceptation of the
name. His sonatas are many, but they are of
exceedingly diverse value, and very few of really
great importance. As is the case with his
quartets, some, which internal evidence would
be sufficient to mark as early attempts, are
curiously innocent and elementary ; and even
throughout, with a few exceptions, their propor
tionate value is not equal to that of other classes
SONATA.
of his numerous works. But the great span of
his musical activity, reaching from the times of
the Bach family till fairly on in Beethoven's
mature years, the changes in the nature of
keyed instruments, and the development of their
resources which took place during his lifetime,
make it inevitable that there should be a marked
difference in the appearance and limits of differ
ent members of the collection. However, he is
always himself, and though the later works are
wider and more richly expressed, they represent
the same mental qualities as the earliest. At all
times his natural bent is in favour of simplifica
tion, as against the old contrapuntal modes of
expression. His easy good-humour speaks best
in simple but often ingeniously balanced tunes
and subjects, and it is but rare that he has re
course to polyphonic expression or to the kind of
idea which calls for it. Partly on this account
and partly on account of narrowness of capacity
in the instrument to which in solo sonatas
he gave most attention, his range of technical
resource is not extensive, and he makes but
little demand upon his performers. His use
of tunes and decisively outlined subjects is
one of the most important points in relation to
structure at this period. Tunes had existed in
connection with words for centuries, and it is
to their association with verses balanced by
distinct rhythmic grouping of lines, that the
sectional tune of instrumental music must ulti
mately be traced. It appears not to be a genuine
instrumental product, but an importation ; and
the fact that almost all the most distinguished
composers were connected with opera establish
ments, just at the time that the tune-element
became most marked in instrumental works,
supports the inference that the opera was the
means through which a popular element ulti
mately passed into the great domain of abstract
music. In preceding times the definition of
subject by hard outlines and systematic conform
ity to a few normal successions of harmony was
not universal ; and the adoption of tunes was
rare. In Haydn and Mozart the culmination of
regularity in the building of subject is reached.
The virtue of this process is that it simplifies the
conditions of structure in the whole movement.
When a correct system of centralisation is found
by which the subject is restrained within the
limits which strictly illustrate but one single
tonality, the feelings which this suggests to the
hearer are such as will be satisfied with equally
simple order in all other parts of the complete
structure. If the creative power is not suffi
ciently concentrated and disciplined to restrain
the direction of its activity within comprehensible
bounds, the result can only be to make perfect
balance and proportion impossible. Thus if the
first section of a movement is so decentralised
that its connection with any particular key cannot
possibly be followed by the hearer, one of the
primary conditions of abstract music has been
violated, and the balance of parts rendered un-
distinguishable. Yet the subject or section may
range broadly in its course, and touch upon many
SONATA.
567
alien tonalities without violating these conditions ;
but then the horizon is broadened so as to neces
sitate an equal relative extension in every part of
the movement. If a poet sets out with a passage
expanded to the full with imagery and implication,
in which almost every word is suggestive of wide
horizons of thought, and carries inference behind
it as complicated as those which lie in simple ex
ternal manifestations of nature, it is useless for
him to go back afterwards to a more limited and
statuesque mode of expression. Even a person of
little cultivation would feel at once the violation
of artistic proportion. A relative degree of heat
and intensity must be maintained at the risk of
the work being as a whole unendurable. But if
a more restricted field of imagination be appealed
to at the outset, the work may be the more easily
and perfectly carried out in simpler and narrower
limits. In abstract music, balance, proportion,
equality in the range of emotional and structural
elements, are some of the most important con
ditions. Not that there is to be equal intensity
all through, but that the salient and subordinate
parts shall be fairly proportionate ; and this
cannot be tested or stated by formulas of science,
but only by cultivated artistic instinct. In
music the art of expressing an idea within
the limits and after the manner necessary for
abstract music had to be discovered. The pro
cess of selection from experimental types had
brought this to the closest point consistent with
completeness in the latter half of the iSth cen
tury. At that time the disposition of the musical
mind was specially set upon obviously intel
ligible order and certainty in the structural aspect
of works. It was a necessary condition for art to
go through ; and though not by any means the
sole or supreme condition of excellence, it is not
strange that the satisfaction derived from the
sense of its achievement should cause people, in
social circumstances which were peculiarly fa
vourable, to put disproportionate stress upon it ;
and that modern writers who have not been able
to keep pace with the inevitable march and change
in the conditions of musical utterance should still
insist on it as if it were the ultimate aim of art :
whereas in fact its prominence in that epoch was
a passing phase having considerable dependence
upon unique social conditions, and its existence
in art at any time is only one of numberless con
stituent elements. The condition of art of that
time enabled the .greatest composers to express
the utmost of their ideas, and to satisfy their
audiences, within the limits of a very simple group
of harmonies. And this simplified the whole pro
cess of building their works to the utmost. Haydn
manipulates the resources which lie within such
limits to admiration. Hardly any composer so
successfully made uniformity out of compounded
diversity on a small scale. He delights in
making the separate limbs of a subject of different
lengths, and yet, out of their total sum, attaining
a perfect and convincing symmetry. The har
monic progression of the subjects is uniformly
obedient to the principles of a form which is on a
preconceived plan, and without some such device
SONATA.
the monotony of well-balanced phrases must soon
have become wearisome. With regard to the
actual distribution of the movements, Haydn
does not depart from that already familiar in the
works of earlier composers. Out of 40 sonatas,
comprising works for pianoforte alone, for piano
forte with accompaniment, and some adaptations,
10 have only two movements, 29 have three,
and only one has four, this last comprising the
only Scherzando in the whole collection of one
hundred and eleven movements. Nearly all the
first movements are in binary form with an occa
sional rondo ; the last is often a rondo, more
often in binary form, and occasionally a theme
and variations. In the sonatas which have more
than two movements, at least twice as many re
tain the old adagio as those which have the
characteristic minuet and trio ; but as a set-off,
several of the sonatas either conclude with a
dance form, or a rondo, or set of variations in the
'Tempo di Minuetto.'
The actual structure of the movements pre
sents occasional peculiarities. In a few cases
the pure old binary type, with repeat of first
subject at the beginning of the second half, re
appears. A considerable number are in the
composite form, in which the first subject makes
two distinct reappearances in full in the second
half, as before described. The two halves of the
movement are generally, but not invariably, re
peated — the first half almost invariably ; in fact,
the absence of the double bar in the middle of
the Sonata in D major (no. 32 in Breitkopf &
Hartel's edition) appears to be the only exception.
The distribution of subjects in balancing keys
appears to be absolutely without exception, as
tonic and dominant, or tonic minor and relative
major. Each movement has usually two distinct
subjects, but occasionally, as is observable in
Haydn's predecessors, the second is not strongly
marked. In a few cases the same subject serves
for both sections. There are a few examples of
his anticipating Beethoven's usage of introducing
clear accessory subjects to carry on the sections.
Thus the above-mentioned Sonata in D major
begins as follows : —
and after completing the period proceeds in the
same key with this distinct accessory subject :
I
^
etc.
Haydn illustrates forcibly the usefulness of de
fining the main division of the movement, not
only by emphasising the harmonic formula of the
cadence, but by appending to it a characteristic
phrase or figure, the position of which, imme
diately before the full stop, renders it particularly
easy to recognise. The purpose and fitness of this
SONATA.
has been already discussed. Haydn's cadence^
figures are generally peculiarly attractive, and
seem to be made so of set purpose. The follow
ing is one of the fullest and longest illustrations,
from a Sonata in E b : —
As a rule the outlines of his binary movements
are more persistently regular than those of his
rondos. Haydn was the first composer of mark to
adopt the rondo with frequency in sonatas. It had
existed in isolation and in suites for a long while,
and examples there are in plenty by Couperin and
other early Frenchmen, who were much given to
it; and also by various members of the Bach
family, including the great John Sebastian. But
hundreds of sonatas, from the highest to the
lowest grade, may be taken at random with a
fair probability of not finding a single example.
The influence of the opera may probably be here
traced again ; in the set tunes and dance types
as significantly as in the general structure. How
ever, though Haydn's kind of rondo is peculiarly
familiar and characteristic, he does not make use
of the form in his sonatas nearly so proportionately
often as later composers do. The proportion in
comparison with Mozart is almost as one to two.
The value and appropriateness of this form is a
matter of opinion. The greatest masters have
used it frequently, and Beethoven with the pro-
foundest effect. The usage of some other com
posers may be fairly described as obtrusively
obvious, and it lends itself with greater readiness
than any other plan of its scope to frivolity and
commonplace. Haydn's subjects are often singu
larly slight, but his development of the form is
almost always ingenious. Thus he varies his dis
position of the episodes, so that sometimes the
main subject and a single episodical subject al
ternate in different circumstances throughout ; at
other times they are disposed so as to resemble
the recapitulation in binary form. In the returns
of the main theme he always exercises some
consideration. In hardly any case does he simply
repeat the theme as it stands throughout ; com
monly each reappearance is a fresh variation.
Occasionally the middle repeats are variations,
and the first and last statements simple and iden
tical ; and sometimes variations of theme and
episode alternate. In all such points his readiness
SONATA.
and energy are apparent, and make his treatment
of the form a model in its particular line.
The slow movements of all the composers of
sonatas till Beethoven's time are rather artificial
and inclined to pose, owing partly to the weakness
and want of sustaining power in their instru
ments. They contain too little of the deep and
liberal feeling which is necessary to make the
highest impression, and too much decorative fin
ger-play, corresponding no doubt to the roulades
and vocal gymnastics for which operatic singers
found such admirable opportunities in the slow
beats of adagios. Haydn's management of such
things is artistic, and he occasionally strikes upon
an interesting subject, but hardly any of the
movements approach to the qualities expected in
the ideal slow movement of modern times.
His distribution of the keys of the movements
is simple. In some of the earlier Sonatas all three
are in the same, or major and minor of the same
key. In. more mature examples he adopts the
familiar antithesis of subdominant, which in later
works preponderates so strongly. In one case
he adopts a very unusual antithesis. This is in
the largest and most elaborate of all the sonatas,
of which the first and last movements are in E b,
and the middle movement in E Q.
One point requires notice in connection with
his violin sonatas, viz. that they are the very re
verse of those of the great school of half a century
earlier ; for inasmuch as with them the violin was
everything, with Haydn it was next to nothing.
Except in obviously late sonatas it does little more
than timidly accompany the pianoforte. It was
in this manner that the violin, having departed
grandly by the front door in the old style, crept
back again into modern instrumental music by
the back. But small as such beginnings were,
Haydn's later and fuller examples are the osten
sible starting-point of a class of music which in
the present century has extended the domain of
the solo sonata, by enlarging its effective scope,
and obtaining a new province for experiment in
the combination of other instruments with the
pianoforte upon equal terms, and with equal
respect to their several idiosyncrasies.
John Christian Bach, the youngest son of
John Sebastian, was Haydn's contemporary and
junior by three years. In his day he was con
sidered an important composer for the pianoforte,
and his style is held to have had some influence
upon Mozart. A sonata of his, in B b, op. 1 7,
is fluent and easily written, but not particularly
interesting, and thoroughly in the style of the
latter part of the iSth century. It consists of
three movements, all in binary form of the older
type. Another sonata, in C minor, is, for the
date, in very singular form; beginning with a
slow movement, having a fugue in the middle,
and ending with a 'Tempo di Gavotta.' Its
style is not strikingly massive, but there are
many traits in it which show that his parentage
•was not entirely without influence. The fugue,
though ably written, has too much of the hybrid
effect common in such works, after the harmonic
structural ideas had laid strong hold of men's
SONATA.
569
minds, to be worthy of comparison with the
genuine achievements of his father. The style
of the work is broad, however, and some ideas
and turns of expression may not unreasonably
be taken to justify the influence attributed to
him.
The difference of age between Haydn and
Mozart was twenty-four years, but in this interval
there was less change in the form of the sonata
than might be expected. It was, in fact, an almost
stationary period, when the attainment of satis
factory structural principles by the labours of a
century and more of composers left men time to
pause and contemplate what appeared to them
to be perfection ; the rhythmic wave of progress
poised almost balanced for a short time before
the rush which brought about an unexpected
culmination in Beethoven.
The difference between Haydn and Mozart is
plainly neither in structure nor altogether in
style of thought and expression, but in advantages
of temporal position. Haydn began nearer to the
time of struggle and uncertainty. He found
much ready to his hand, and he tested it and
applied it, and improved it ; and when Mozart
came there was little to do but adapt his supreme
gifts of fluency, clearness, and beauty of melody
to glorify the edifice.
The progression of artistic instinct is at pre
sent an unexplained phenomenon ; it can only
be judged from observation that the children of
a later generation are born with a predisposed
facility to realise in perfect clearness the forms
which preceding generations have been wander-
ingly and dimly striving after. It is possible
that the affinity between genuine music and the
mental conditions of the race is so close that the
progress of the latter carries the former with it
as part of the same organic development. ' At all
events, Mozart was gifted with an extraordinary
and hitherto unsurpassed instinct for formal per
fection, and his highest achievements lie not more
in the tunes which have so captivated the world,
than in the perfect symmetry of his best works.
Like Haydn, his ideas are naturally restricted
within limits which simplify to the utmost the
development of the form which follows from them.
They move in such perfect obedience to the limits
and outlines of the harmonic progressions which
most certainly characterise the key, that the
structural system becomes architecturally patent
and recognisable to all listeners that have any
understanding. In his time these formal outlines
were fresh enough to bear a great deal of use
without losing their sweetness ; and Mozart used
them with remarkable regularity. Out of thirty-
six of his best-known, sonatas, twenty-nine are
in the now familiar order of three movements, and
no less than thirty-three have the first movement
in binary form. That binary form is moreover so
regular, that the same pauses and the same suc
cessions of harmony, and the same occurrences
of various kinds, may often be safely anticipated
at the same point in the progress of the move
ments. He makes some use, often conspicuously,
of the device of repeating short phrases con-
670
SONATA.
secutively, which has already been described in
connection with Scarlatti's work. Thus in a
Sonata in D major for Violin and Pianoforte,
the first section of the first movement may be
divided into seven distinct passages, each of which
is severally repeated in some form or other con
secutively. There are some peculiarities, such as
the introduction of a new subject in the working-
out portion of the work, instead of keeping con
sistently to development of the principal ideas ;
and the filling of the episodes of a rondo with
a variety of different ideas, severally distinct;
but as these points are not the precursors
of further development, they are hardly worth
discussing. It only requires to be pointed out
that occasionally in pianoforte and other sonatas
he makes experiments in novel distribution and
entirely original manipulation of the structural
elements of binary and other forms ; which is
sufficient to prove not only that he recognised
the fitness of other outlines besides those that
he generally adopted, but that he was capable
of adapting himself to novel situations, if there
had been any call for effort in that direction.
As it happened, the circumstances both of musical
and social life were unique, and he was enabled to
satisfy the highest critical taste of his day without
the effort of finding a new point of departure.
His treatment of rondo-form is different and
less elementary than Haydn's. Haydn most com
monly used a very decisively sectional system,
in which every characteristic portion, especially
the theme, was marked off distinct and complete.
This accorded with the primitive idea of rondos as
exemplified, often very happily, in the works of
early French composers, and in certain forms of
vocal music. The root-idea appears in the most
elementary stages of musical intelligence as a dis
tinct verse or tune which forms the staple of the
whole matter, and is, for the sake of contrast, inter
spersed with digressions of subordinate interest.
It is so obvious a means of arriving at something
like structural balance, that it probably existed
in times even before the earliest of which evi
dence remains. In the earliest specimens to be
found in sonatas, the traces of their kinship
can be clearly followed. Reference has been
already made to the two examples in the sonatas
by Paradies, which consist of an aria, a con
trasting passage, and then the aria pure and
simple again, and so forth. Haydn adopted the
same general outline. He frequently begins with
a complete theme systematically set out with
double bars and repeats, and a full conclusion.
He then begins something entirely different
either in a new related key, or in the minor
of the principal key, and makes a complete whole
of that also, and so on right through, alternating
his main tune with one or more others all
equally complete. Under such circumstances
his principle of giving variations at each return
of the theme or repetition of an episode is
almost indispensable to avoid monotony. Mozart
rarely makes any point of this plan of adopting
variations in his sonata-rondos, because it is
not required. He does not often cast his theme
SONATA.
in such extremely distinct outlines. In structure
it is more what an ordinary binary subject would
be ; that is, complete and distinct in itself as an
idea, without being so carried out as to make its
connection with the rest of the movement a
matter of secondary rather than intrinsic con
sequence. Haydn's conception is perfectly just
and rational, but Mozart's is more mature. The
theme and its episodes are more closely inter
woven, and the development of the whole has
a more consistent and uniform texture. Mozart
does not avoid varying his theme ; on the con
trary, he constantly puts in the most delicate
strokes of detail, and of graceful adornment, and
sometimes resorts to delightfully ready develop
ment of its resources ; but with him it is not so
indispensable, because his conception of the form
gives it so much more freedom and elasticity.
The central movement of his three-movement
sonatas is almost invariably a slow one, com
monly in the key of the subdominant. The style
of these is characteristic of the time; that is,
rather artificial and full of graces, which require
to be given with a somewhat conscious elegance
of manner, not altogether consonant with the
spirit of later times. They rarely touch the point
of feeling expected in modern movements of the
kind, because the conception formed of the proper
function of the slow movement in his time was
clearly alien to that of the ipth century. As
specimens of elegance and taste, however, Mo
zart's examples probably attain the highest point
possible in their particular genus.
The technique of his sonatas, from the point of
view of instrumental resource, is richer and fuller
than Haydn's, but still thin and rather empty
in sound to ears that are accustomed to the
wonderful development of the resources of the
modern pianoforte ; but the refinement and self-
containment of his style make him particularly
acceptable to artists who idealise finish and ele
gance in solo performance, and nicety of ensemble
in works for combined instruments, as the highest
and most indispensable condition of art. His in
stinct for adapting his thoughts to instrumental
idiosyncrasies was of a very high order when the
instruments were familiar and properly developed.
This with the pianoforte was not yet achieved,
and consequently some of his forms of expression
are hardly adapted to its nature, and seem in
these days to be rather compromises than perfectly
suitable utterances.
With regard to the technical matter of the
development of the resources of the pianoforte,
Mozart's contemporary, Muzio Clementi, occu
pies a most important position, dementi, m
his early days, according to his own admission,
applied himself rather to the development of th<
resources of playing than to the matter^ to be
played, and attained a degree and a kind
mastery which no one before his time had heard
the like of. When he began to apply himself
more to the matter, this study served him m
good stead ; and his divination of the treatment
most appropriate to the instrument, expanded by
this means in practical application, marks his
SONATA.
sonatas as among the very first in which the
genuine qualities of modern pianoforte music on
a large scale are shown. They begin to approach
to that broad and almost orchestral style which
is sometimes said to be characteristic of Bee
thoven ; and the use of octaves and fuller combin
ations of sound, and the occasional irruption of
passages which bring into play stronger muscles
than those of the fingers, are all in the direction
of modern usage. In respect of structure, it is not
necessary to consider more than that he commonly
accepted the three^movement type of sonata, be
ginning with a movement in binary form and
ending with a rondo, and having a slow movement
in the middle. His handling is free and at the
same time thoroughly under control. One of his
characteristics is the love of importing little
touches of learning or scientific ingenuity into
the treatment ; as in the Sonata in G (of four
movements) in which two canons in direct and
contrary motion take the place of the minuet
and trio. In another sonata, in F, one figure is
woven through the whole substance of the first
movement, appearing in the different sections di
minished and inverted, and in various phases of
expression which quite alter its aspect. His slow
movements are sometimes equally simple and ex
pressive, but also frequently of that ornamental
order which has been sufficiently commented on.
In one celebrated case he anticipated the
modern taste for programme by calling one of
his longest and most pretentious sonatas 'Di-
done abbandonata. Scena tragica.' But ap
pearance of dramatic purpose does not turn him
aside from regularity of form any more than in
other sonatas. His style is not exempt from the
family likeness which is observable in all com
posers of the latter part of the century. His
ideas are large and broad, and not unworthy to
have exerted some influence upon both Mozart and
Beethoven. A certain dryness and reticence
makes him unlikely to be greatly in favour in
modern times, but his place as an important
figure in the development of the sonata in its
relation with the pianoforte is assured.
One further composer who deserves some con
sideration in connection with the sonata before
Beethoven's time is J. L. Dussek, who was
born ten years after dementi, and soon after
Mozart. His most noteworthy characteristics
are an individual though not incisive style, and
an instinct of a high order for the qualities
and requirements of the pianoforte. There is
some diversity in point of value between his
early and his later sonatas. The former are
rather narrow in idea and structure, whereas the
latter, such as Opus 70 in Ab, are quite re
markable for freedom and elaboration of form
and subject. Both in this sonata and in the
Opus 77 he makes use of the hitherto almost
unknown device of extending the effect of the
first sections by subordinate transitions as well
as by accessory subjects. In the first movement
of Opus 70 there is the unusual feature of a happy
modulation out and back again in the actual
substance of the second subject — a characteristic
SONATA.
571
which is common enough in the works of such
moderns as Schumann and Brahms, but was
exceedingly rare in Dussek's time. Another
characteristic which Dussek has in common with
more modern writers is the infusion of a certain
amount of sense and sentiment even into his
passages and flourishes, which with his im
mediate predecessors had been too commonly
barren. He also takes thought to enliven his
recapitulations by variation or ingeniously di
versified transposition of order in the ideas (as
in Opus 77). His writing for the instrument is
brilliant and sparkling, and has certain premo
nitions of Weber in it. The ideas are sometimes,
even in his best works, trite and vapid, but more
often delicate and attractive. The slow move
ments have a sustained and serious manner, also
unusual in his time, and said to be derived from
his having studied the organ considerably in his
younger days. He stands historically with
giants on either hand, and this has contributed
to make him appear somewhat of a parenthesis
in the direct course of sonata development.
Their vastness of artistic proportion did not
however suppress his personality, or extinguish
his individuality, which is still clear in his own
line, and has exerted some influence both upon
the modern style of playing, and also upon the
style of musical thought of a few modern com
posers for the pianoforte to whom the giants
did not strongly appeal.
The direct line of development after Haydn,
Mozart, and dementi, is obviously continued
in Beethoven. As we have pointed out, the
changes which took place after Emmanuel Bach's
labours were less rapid and remarkable than in
times preceding. The finishing touches had been
put to the structural system, and men were so
delighted with its perfection as structure, that
they were content to hear it repeated over and
over again without calling for variety or indi
viduality in the treatment, and very often with
out caring much about the quality of the thing
said. The other side of development was tech
nical. The pianoforte being a new instrument,
the manner of musical speech best adapted to it
had to be discovered. With* the earlier com
posers forms of expression better suited to other
instruments were adopted ; but by degrees
experiments in effect and assiduous attention to
the capabilities of the hand, such as dementi
gave in his early years, had brought the me
chanism of expression to a tolerably consistent
and complete state ; so that when Beethoven
appeared he was spared the waste of force inci
dent to having to overcome elementary problems
of instrumental technique, and the waste of
effect incidental to compromises, and was en
abled to concentrate all his powers upon the
musical material.
Beethoven's works introduce a new element
into the problem, and one that complicates mat
ters immeasurably. With his predecessors
structural simplicity had been a paramount con
sideration, and often straitened somewhat the
freedom of the idea. The actual subjects seem
572
SONATA.
drilled into a regular shape, admitting of very
little variation, in order that the development
of the movement might march direct and
undeviating in its familiar course. Musicians
had arrived at that artificial state of mind which
deliberately chose to be conscious of formal
elements. Their misconception was a natural
one. The existing conditions of art might lead
a man to notice that uncultivated people de
lighted in simple and single tunes, and that culti
vated people enjoyed the combination of several,
when disposed according to certain laws, and to
conclude from this that the disposition was of
more importance than the matter. But, in fact,
the mind is led from point to point by feelings
which follow the ideas, and of these and their
interdependence and development it is necessarily
conscious ; but of the form it is not actively con
scious unless the ideas have not sufficient force
to possess it, or the necessities of logical conse
quence are outrageously violated. It is only
under peculiar social and intellectual conditions
that structural qualities can be so excessively
emphasised. The production of a genuine master
must be ultimately reducible to logical analysis,
but not on the spot or at once; and to insist
upon art being so immediately verifiable is not
only to set the conclusion to be drawn from its
historical development upside down, but to refer
the enjoyment of its highest achievements to the
contemplation of dry bones. The imagination
and the reason must both be satisfied, but before
all things the imagination.
In the middle years of the i8th century
the imaginative side had not a fair chance.
Music was too much dependent upon the narrow
limits of the taste of polite circles, and the field
of appeal to emotion was not free. But when
at last the natural man threw off the incubus
that had so long oppressed him, the spiritual
uprising and the broadening of life brought a
new kind of vigour into art and literature.
Beethoven was the first great composer to whom
the limitless field of unconventionalised human
emotion was opened, and his disposition was
ready for the opportunity. Even in the ordinary
trifles of life he sometimes showed by an appar
ently superfluous rebellion against polite usages
his antipathy to artificiality, and conversely the
bent of his sympathy towards unmistakeable
realities of human feeling. He thus became the
prototype of genuine modern music, and the first
exponent of its essential qualities ; and the
sonata form being ready in its main outlines for
his use, and artistic instinct having achieved the
most perfect spontaneity in its employment, he
took possession of it as an appropriate mode of
formulating some of the richest and most im
pressive of his thoughts. With him the idea
asserted its rights. This is not to say that
structure is ignored, but that the utmost expan
sion and liberty is admitted in the expression of
the vital parts which can be made consistent
with perfect balance in the unfolding of the
whole ; and this obviously depends upon the
powers of the composer. Under such circum-
SONATA.
stances he can only be guided by the highest
development of instinct, for the process of
balance and distribution becomes so complicated
that it is almost out of the reach of conscious
analysis, much more of the dictation of science.
The evolution of this vital ingredient, the idea,
is so obscure and difficult that it is out of the
question to enter upon it in this place. It is an
unhappy fact that the scientists who have en
deavoured to elucidate music, with a few great
and honourable exceptions, foreseeing that the
analysis of ideas was quite beyond their reach,
at all events until immense advances are made
in the sciences which have direct reference to
the human organism, have set their faces to the
structural elements, as if music consisted of
nothing but lines and surfaces. The existence
of idea is so habitually ignored that it neces
sarily appears to be nonexistent in their estimate
of art. On the other hand, the philosophers
who have said anything about it appear on the
surface not to be in accord; though in reality
their views are both compatible and necessary,
but require a more detailed experience of the
art and of its historical development to explain
their interaction. But meanwhile the external
method of the scientists gains disproportionate
preeminence, and conscientious people feel un
easily that there may be no such things as ideas
at all, and that they will be doing better to
apply themselves to mathematics. And yet the
idea is everything, and without it music is abso
lutely null and void ; and though a great and
comprehensive mathematician may make an
analysis after the event, a synthesis which is
merely the fruit of his calculations will be
nothing more than a sham and an imposture.
In fact the formulation of the idea is a most
vital matter in musical history, and its progress
can be traced from the earliest times, proceeding
simultaneously with the development of the
general structure of the sonata. The expressive
raw material was drawn from various sources.
The style of expression developed under the in
fluences of religion in the ages preceding the
beginnings of instrumental music, supplied some
thing; dance music of all orders, mimetic and
merely rhythmic, supplied much ; the pseudo-
realism of the drama, in respect of vocal inflexion
and imitations of natural circumstances, also
something; and the instincts surviving in the
race from countless past ages, the actual cries
arising from spontaneous nervous reaction, and
many other similar causes, had a share in sug
gestion, and in actual, though unrealised, motive
power. And all these, compounded and inseparably
intermingled, supplied the basis of the expressive
element in music. Through all the time from
Monteverde to Beethoven this expressive element
was being more and more clearly drawn into com
pact and definite proportions ; floating at first
vaguely on the surface, springing out in flashes 01
exceptional brightness here and there, and at
times presenting almost perfect maturity by fits
of individual good fortune ; but hardly ever so
free but that some of the matrix is felt to be
SONATA.
clinging to the ore. It obtained complete but
restricted symmetry with the composers imme
diately preceding Beethoven, but arrived only
at last with him at that expansion which made
it at once perfect and intelligible, and yet bound
less in range within the limits of the art-material
at the composer's command.
Prior to Beethoven, the development of a long
work was based upon antitheses of distinct tunes
and concrete lumps of subject representing sepa
rate organisms, either merely in juxtaposition,
or loosely connected by more or less empty
passages. There were ideas indeed, but ideas
limited and confined by the supposed necessities
of the structure of which they formed a part.
But what Beethoven seems to have aimed at
was the expansion of the term ' idea ' from the
isolated subject to the complete whole ; so that
instead of the subjects being separate, though
compatible items, the whole movement, or
even the whole work, should be the complete
and uniform organism which represented in its
entirety a new meaning of the word 'idea,' of
which the subjects, in their close connection
and inseparable affinities, were subordinate limbs.
This principle is traceable in works before his
tune, but not on the scale to which he carried
it, nor with his conclusive force. In fact, the
condition of art had not been sufficiently mature
to admit the terms of his procedure, and it was
harely mature enough till he made it so.
His early works were in conformity with the
style and structural principles of his predecessors;
but he began, at least in pianoforte works, to
build at once upon the topmost stone of their
edifice. His earliest sonatas (op. 2) are on the
scale of their symphonies. He began with the
four -movement plan which they had almost en
tirely reserved for the orchestra. In the second
sonata he already produces an example of his own
peculiar kind of slow movement, full, rich, deci
sive in form, unaffected in idea, and completely
divested of the elaborate graces which had been
before its most conspicuous feature. In the
same sonata also he produces a scherzo, short
in this instance, and following the lines of
the minuet, but of the genuine characteristic
quality. Soon, in obedience to the spread of his
idea, the capacity of the instrument seems to
expand, and to attain an altogether new richness
of sound, and a fullness it never showed before,
as in many parts of the 4th Sonata (op. 7),
especially the Largo, which shows the unmistake-
able qualities which ultimately expanded into
the unsurpassed slow movement of the Opus 106.
As early as the 2nd Sonata he puts a new
aspect upon the limits of the first sections ; he
not only makes his second subject in the first
movement modulate, but he develops the cadence-
figure into a very noticeable subject. It is for
tunately unnecessary to follow in detail the
various ways in which he expanded the struc
tural elements of the sonata, as it has already
been described in the article BEETHOVEN, and
other details are given in the article FORM. In
respect of the subject and its treatment, a for-
SONATA.
573
tunate opportunity is offered by a coincidence
between a subordinate subject in a sonata of
Haydn's in C, and a similar accessory in Beetho
ven's Sonata for cello and pianoforte in A major
(op. 59), which serves to illustrate pregnantly
the difference of scope which characterises their
respective treatment. Haydn's is as follows : —
=$
I
^^^
:*==*^— t
^
etc.
=j— — q
etc.
r r r
J r
574
SONATA.
As has been already explained, an expansion of
this kind makes inevitable a similar expansion
in the whole structure of the movement, and a
much wider choice of relative keys than simple
tonic and dominant in the expository sections ;
or else a much freer movement in every part of
the sections, and emphasis upon unexpected re
lations of harmony. Even without this, the new
warmth and intensity of the subject precludes
mere reiteration of the accustomed usages, and
necessitates a greater proportionate vitality in
the subordinate parts of the work. The relative
heat must be maintained, and to fall back upon
familiar formulas would clearly be a jarring
anomaly. In this manner the idea begins to
dictate the form. But in order to carry out
in equal measure the development of the idea,
every resource that the range of music can
supply must be admissible to him that can wield
it with relevance. Hence Beethoven, as early as
Opus 31, no. 2, reintroduces instrumental recita
tive with extraordinary effect. Later, he resumes
the rhapsodical movement which Bach and earlier
composers had employed in a different sense, as
in the Sonata in Eb, op. 81, and in the third
division of that in A, op. 101, and in the most
romantic of romantic movements, the first in E
major of op. 109. And lastly, he brings back
the fugue as the closest means of expressing
a certain kind of idea. In these cases the fugue
is not a retrogression, nor a hybrid, but a new
adaptation of an old and invaluable form under
the influence of perfectly assimilated harmonic
principles. The great fugue in the Sonata in Bb,
op. 1 06, for instance, is not only extraordinary
as a fugue, but is distributed in a perfectly ideal
balance of long contrasting periods in different
states of feeling, culminating duly with a su
preme rush of elaborate force, as complex and as
inexorable as some mighty action of nature. In
these sonatas Beethoven touches all moods, and
all in the absolute manner free from formality
or crude artifice, which is the essential charac
teristic of genuine modern music. In a few of
the earlier sonatas he reverts to manners and
structural effects which are suggestive of the
principles of his predecessors. But these occa
sional incursions of external influence are with
rare exceptions inferior to the works in which
his own original force of will speaks with genuine
and characteristic freedom. The more difficult
the problem suggested by the thought which is
embodied in the subject, the greater is the result.
The full richness of his nature is not called out
to the strongest point till there is something pre-
ternaturally formidable to be mastered. The
very statement of the opening bars of such sonatas
as that in D minor, op. 31, no. 2 ; C major, op.
53 ; F minor, op. 57 ; Bb, op. 106 : C minor, op.
ill, is at such a level of daring breadth and
comprehensive power, that it becomes obvious
in a moment that the work cannot be carried out
on equal proportionate terms without almost
superhuman concentration, and unlimited com
mand of technical resources, both in respect
of the instrument and the art of expression. In
SONATA.
such cases, Beethoven rises to a height which has
only been attained by two or three composers in
the whole history of music, in that sublimity
which is almost his peculiar monopoly. But,
fortunately for average beings, and average moods
of people who have not always a taste for the
sublime, he shows elsewhere, on a less exalted
scale, the highest ideals of delicate beauty, and
all shades of the humours of mankind, even to
simple exuberant playfulness. The beauty and
the merriment often exist side by side, as in the
exquisite little Sonata in G, op. 14, no. 2, and
in that in Fjf major, op. 78; and in a loftier
and stronger spirit in company with more com
prehensive ranges of feeling, in the Sonata in A,
op. 101. In all these and many more there is an
ideal continuity and oneness which is musically
felt even where there is no direct external sign
of the connection. In a few, however, there are
signs of more than this. In the Bb Sonata, op.
106, for instance, the similar disposition of inter
vals in the subjects of the various movements has
led to the inference that he meant to connect
them by transformations of one principal subject
or germ. The same occurs with as much pro
minence in the Sonata in Ab, op. no, which is
in any case a specimen where the oneness and
continuity are peculiarly felt. It is possible that
the apparent transformations are not so much
conscious as the result of the conditions of mind
which were necessary to produce the oneness of
effect, since concentration upon any subject is
liable to exert influence upon closely succeeding
action, whether of the mind or body, and to as
similate the fruit unconsciously to the form of
the object contemplated. This, however, would
not lessen the interest of the fact, but would
possibly rather enhance it. It only affects the
question whether or no Beethoven consciously
reasoned about possible ways of extending and
enhancing the opportunities of sonata-form — too
large a subject to be entered upon here. As a rule,
great masters appear to hit upon such germinal
principles in the process of composition, without
exactly formulating them in so many equivalent
terms ; and those who come after note the facts
and apply them as useful resources, or sometimes
as invaluable starting-points of fresh lines of
development. It is a noticeable fact that
Beethoven only seldom indicated a programme,
and it is extremely rare in him to find even the
dimmest suggestions of realism. In fact, as
must be true of all the highest music, a work of
his is not representative of a story, but of a
mental process. Even if it deals with a story it
does not represent the circumstances, but the
condition of mind which results from its con
templation ; or, in other words, the musical
counterpart of the emotion to which it gives
rise ; and it is the coherency and consistent
sequence of the emotions represented which pro
duce the effect of oneness on the colossal scale
of his greatest works, which is Beethoven's crown
ing achievement. With him the long process of
development appears to find its utmost and com
plete culmination ; and what comes after, and in
SONATA.
Sight of Ms work, can be little more than
commentary. It may be seen, without much
effort, that mankind does not achieve more than
one supreme triumph on the same lines of art.
When the conditions of development are ful
filled the climax is reached, but there is not more
than one climax to each crescendo. The con
ditions of human life change ceaselessly, and
with them the phenomena of art, which are
their counterpart. The characteristics of the
art of any age are the fruit of the immediate
past, as much as are the emotional and intel
lectual conditions of that age. They are its
signs, and it is impossible to produce in a suc
ceeding age a perfect work of art in the same
terms as those which are the direct fruit of a
different and earlier group of causes ; and it is
partly for this reason that attempts to return to
earlier conditions of art, which leave out the
essential characteristics of contemporary feeling,
invariably ring false.
The time produced other real men besides
Beethoven, though not of his stamp. Weber
and Schubert were both of the genuine modern
type, genuinely musical through and through,
though neither of them was a born writer of
sonatas as Beethoven was. Beethoven possessed,
together with the supremest gift of ideas, a
power of prolonged concentration, and the cer
tainty of self-mastery. This neither Weber nor
Schubert possessed. Beethoven could direct his
thought with infallible certainty ; in Weber and
Schubert the thought was often too much their
master, and they both required, to keep them
perfectly certain in the direction of their original
musical matter, the guiding principle of a con
sciously realised dramatic or lyrical conception,
which was generally supplied to them from
without. As should be obvious from the above
survey of the process of sonata development, the
absolute mastery of the structural outlines, the
sureuess of foot of the strong man moving, unaided,
but direct in his path, amidst the conflicting
suggestions of his inspiration, is indispensable to
the achievement of great and genuine sonatas.
The more elaborate the art of expression be
comes, the more difficult the success. Beethoven
probably stood just at the point where the ex-
tremest elaboration and the most perfect mastery
of combination on a large scale were possible.
He himself supplied suggestion for yet further
elaboration, and the result is that the works of
his successors are neither so concentrated nor so
well in hand as his. Weber was nearest in
point of time, but his actual mastery of the art
of composition was never very certain nor
thoroughly regulated, though his musical in
stincts were almost marvellous. He had one
great advantage, which was that he was a great
pianist, and had the gift to extend the resources
of the instrument by the invention of new and
characteristic effects ; and he was tolerably suc
cessful in avoiding the common trap of letting
effect stand for substance. Another advantage
was his supreme gift of melody. His tunes are
for the most part of the old order, but infused
SONATA.
575
with new life and heat by a breath from the
genius of the people. His two best sonatas, in
Ab and D minor, are rich in thought, forcible,
and genuinely full of expression. He always
adopts the plan of four movements, and disposes
them in the same order as Beethoven did. His
treatment of form is also full and free, and he
often imports some individuality into it. As
simple instances may be taken — the use of the
introductory phrase in the first movement of the
Sonata in C, in the body of the movement ; the
rondo structure of the slow movements, especi
ally in the Sonata in D minor, which has a short
introduction, and elaborate variations in the
place of exact returns of the subject ; and the
interspersion of subjects in the first movement
of the Sonata in E minor, op. 70, so as to
knit the two sections of the first half doubly
together. An essentially modern trait is his
love of completing the cycle of the movement
by bringing in a last allusion to the opening
features of the whole movement at the end,
generally with some new element of expression
or vivacity. Specially noticeable in this respect
are the first and last (the ' Moto perpetuo') of the
C major, the last of the Ab, and the first and
last in both the D minor and E minor Sonatas.
Weber had an exceptional instinct for dance-
rhythms, and this comes out very remarkably in
some of the minuets and trios, and in the last
movement of the E minor.
As a whole the Weber group is a decidedly
important item in pianoforte literature, instinct
with romantic qualities, and aiming at elaborate
expressiveness, as is illustrated by the numerous
directions in the Ab Sonata, such as ' con anima,'
'con duolo,' 'con passione,' 'con molt' affetto,'
and so forth. These savour to a certain extent
of the opera, and require a good deal of art and
musical sense in the variation of time and the
phrasing to give them due effect ; and in this
they show some kinship to the ornamental
adagios of the times previous to Beethoven,
though dictated by more genuinely musical
feelings.
Schubert's sonatas do not show any operatic
traits of the old manner, but there is plenty
in them which may be called dramatic in a
modern sense. His instincts were of a preemi
nently modern type, and the fertility of his ideas
in their superabundance clearly made the self-
restraint necessary for sonata-writing a matter
of some difficulty. He was tempted to give
liberty to the rush of thought which possessed
him, and the result is sometimes delightful, but
sometimes also bewildering. There are move
ments and even groups of them which are of the
supremest beauty, but hardly any one sonata
which is completely satisfactory throughout. His
treatment of form is often daring even to rash
ness, and yet from the point of view of principle
offers but little to remark, though in detail
some perfectly magical feats of harmonic pro
gression and strokes of modulation have had a
good deal of influence upon great composers
of later times. The point which he serves to
576
SONATA.
illustrate peculiarly in the history of music i8
the transition from the use of the idea, as
shown in Beethoven's Sonatas on a grand and
richly-developed scale, to the close and intensely
emotional treatment of ideas in a lyrical manner,
which has as yet found its highest exponent in
Schumann. In this process Schubert seems to
stand midway — still endeavouring to conform
to sonata ways, and yet frequently overborne
by the invincible potency of the powers his own
imagination has called up. The tendency is
further illustrated by the exquisite beauty of
some of the smaller and more condensed move
ments, which lose nothing by being taken out of
the sonatas ; being, like many of Schumann's,
specimens of intense concentration in short
space, the fruit of a single flash of deep emo
tion. Among the longer movements, the one
which is most closely unified is the first of the
A minor, op. 143, in which a feature of the
first subject is made to preponderate conspicu
ously all through, manifestly representing the
persistence of a special quality of feeling through
the varying phases of a long train of thought.
Like many other movements, it has a strong
dramatic element, but more under appropriate
control than usual.
As a whole, though illustrating richly many
of the tendencies of modern music, the Sonatas
cannot be taken as representing Schubert's
powers as a composer of instrumental music so
satisfactorily as his Quartets, his String Quintet,
and some of his finest Symphonies. In these he
often rose almost to the highest point of musical
possibility. And this serves further to illustrate
the fact that since Beethoven the tendency has
been to treat the sonata-form with the fresh oppor
tunities afforded by combinations of instruments,
rather than on the old lines of the solo sonata.
Two other composers of sonatas of Beethoven's
time require notice. These are Woelfl and
Hummel. The former chiefly on account of his
once celebrated sonata called ' Ne plus ultra, '
in which he showed some of the devices of
technique which he was considered to have in
vented — such as passages in thirds and sixths,
and ingenious applications of the shake. The
matter is poor and vapid, and as throwing light
upon anything except his powers as a player,
is worthless. Its very title condemns it, for
Woelfl had the advantage of being Beethoven's
junior; and it is astonishing how, by the side
of the genuine difficulty of Beethoven's master
pieces, such a collection of tricks could ever have
been dignified, even by the supposition of being
particularly difficult. It seems impossible that
such work should have had any influence upon
genuinely musical people; but the sonata has
all the signs of a useful piece for second-rate
popular occasions ; for which the variations on
'Life let us cherish' would doubtless be particu
larly effective.
Hummel in comparison with Woelfl was a
giant, and certainly had preeminent gifts as a
pianoforte-player. Like Weber he had an apti
tude for inventing effects and passages, but he
SONATA.
applied them in a different manner. He was of
that nature which cultivates the whole technical
art of speech till able to treat it with a certainty
which has all the effect of mastery, and then
instead of using it to say something, makes it
chiefly serviceable to show off the contents of
his finger repertoire. However, his technique is
large and broad, full of sound and brilliancy,
and when the works were first produced and
played by himself they must have been ex
tremely astonishing. His facility of speech is also
wonderful, but his ideas were for the most part
old-fashioned, even when he produced them — for
it must not be forgotten that he was eight years
younger than Beethoven and twenty- six younger
than dementi. The spirit which seems to rule
him is the consciousness of a pianist before an
audience, guided by the chances of display. His
modulations are free and bold, but they are
often superfluous, because the ideas are not on
the level of intensity or broad freedom which
necessitates or even justifies them. He probably
saw that modulation was a means of effect, but
did not realise that there is a ratio between the
qualities of subject and the development of the
movement that springs from it. From this it
will be obvious that his sonatas are not written
in the mood to produce works that are musically
important. He had the very finest possible op
portunities through living in Mozart's house
during his most impressionable days, and the
fruit is sufficiently noticeable in the clearness
with which he distributes his structural ele
ments, and in much of his manner of expressing
himself ; but he had not the inventive gift for
musical ideas, which contact and even familiar
intercourse with great masters seems inade
quate to supply. The survival of traits char
acteristic of earlier times is illustrated by some
of his slow movements, in which he brought
the most elaborate forces of his finished tech
nique to serve in the old style of artificial
adagio, where there is a hyper-elaborated grace
at every corner, and a shake upon every note
that is long enough ; and if a chord be suitable
to rest upon for a little, it is adorned with
quite a collection of ingenious finger exercises,
artificially manipulated scales and arpeggios, and
the like contrivances ; which do not serve to de
corate anything worthy of the honour, but stand
on their own merits. There are occasional traits
of expression and strokes of force in the sonatas,
but the technique of the pianist preponderates
excessively over the invention of the composer.
At the same time the right and masterly use of
the resources of an instrument is not by any
means a matter of small moment in art, and
Hummel' s is right and masterly in a very re
markable degree.
After the early years of the present century,
the sonata, in its conventional sense of instru
mental work for a solo or at most for two instru
ments, occupies a smaller and decreasing space
in the domain of music. Great composers have
paid it proportionately very little attention, and
the few examples they afford have rather an
SONATA.
effect of being out of the direct line of their
natural mode of expression. In Chopin, for in
stance, the characteristic qualities of modern
music, in the treatment of ideas in short and
malleable forms specially adapted to their ex
pression, are found abundantly, and in these his
genuine qualities are most clearly displayed. His
sonatas are less successful, and less familiar to
musicians ; because, though quite master enough
to deal with structure clearly and definitely, it
was almost impossible for him to force the ideas
within the limits which should make that struc
ture relevant and convincing. They are children
of a fervid and impetuous genius, and the clas
sical dress and manners do not sit easily upon
them. Moreover the luxuriant fancy, the rich
ness and high colour of expression, the sensuous
qualities of the harmony, all tend to emphasise
detail in a new and peculiar manner, and to
make the sonata-principle of the old order appear
irrelevant. The most successful are the Sonatas
in Bb minor for pianoforte, op. 35, and that for
pianoforte and cello in G minor, op. 65. In both
these cases the first movements, which are gener
ally a sure test of a capacity for sonata- writing,
are clearly disposed, and free from superfluous
wandering and from tautology. There are cer
tain idiosyncrasies in the treatment of the form,
as for instance in the recapitulation, which in
both cases is almost limited to the materials of
the second section, the opening features of the
movement being only hinted at in conclusion.
The subjects themselves are fairly appropriate
to the style of movement, and are kept well
in hand, so that on the whole, in these two
cases, the impression conveyed is consistent with
the sonata-character. In scherzos Chopin was
thoroughly at home, and moreover they repre
sent a province in which far more abandonment
is admissible. In both sonatas they are suc
cessful, but that in the Pianoforte Sonata is
especially fascinating and characteristic, and
though the modulations are sometimes rather
reckless the main divisions are well propor
tioned, and consequently the general effect of
the outlines is sufficiently clear. The slow move
ments of both are very well known ; that of
the Pianoforte Sonata being the Funeral March,
and the other being a kind of romance in Chopin's
own free manner, which is familiar to players
on the cello. The last movement of the Piano
forte Sonata is a short but characteristic out
break of whirling notes, in general character not
unlike some of his Preludes, and equally free and
original in point of form, but in that respect not
without precedent among the last movements of
early masters. In the mind of the composer
it possibly had a poetical connection with the
Funeral March. The other last movement is a
free kind of rondo, and therefore more consonant
with the ordinary principles of form, and is appro
priate, without being so interesting as the other
movements. The total effect of these sonatas is
naturally of an entirely different order from that
of the earlier types, and not so convincing in
oneness as the works of great masters of this kind
VOL. HJ. PT. 5.
SONATA.
577
of form; they are nevertheless plausible as wholes,
and in details most effective ; the balance and ap
propriate treatment of the two instruments in the
op. 65 being especially noteworthy. The other
sonatas for pianoforte, in C minor and B minor,
are more unequal. The first appears to be an
early work, and contains some remarkable ex
periments, one of which at least has value,
others probably not. As examples may be men
tioned the use of 5 -4 time throughout the slow
movement, and the experiment of beginning the
recapitulation of the first movement in Bb minor,
when the principal key is C minor. In this
sonata he seems not to move with sufficient ease,
and in the B minor, op. 58, with something too
much to have the general aspect of a successful
work of the kind. The technical devices in the
latter as in the others are extremely elaborate
and effective, without being offensively obtrusive,
and the ideas are often clear and fascinating ; but
as a complete and convincing work it is hardly
successful.
Sonatas which followed implicitly the old
lines without doing more than formulate sub
jects according to supposed laws do not require
any notice. The mere artificial reproduction of
forms that have been consciously realised from
observation of great works of the past without
importing anything original into the treatment,
is often the most hopeless kind of plagiarism,
and far more deliberate than the accidents of
coincidence in ideas which are obvious to super
ficial observers.
As examples of independent thought working
in a comparatively untried field, Mendelssohn's
six sonatas for the organ have some import
ance. They have very little connection with the
Pianoforte Sonata, or the history of its develop
ment ; for Mendelssohn seems to have divined
that the binary and similar instrumental forms
of large scope were unsuitable to the genius of
the instrument, and returned to structural prin
ciples of a date before those forms had become
prominent or definite. Their chief connection
with the modern sonata type lies in the distri
bution of the keys in which the respective move-
j ments stand, and the broad contrasts in time and
character which subsist between one division or
movement and another. Different members of
the group represent different methods of dealing
with the problem. In the large movements fugal
and contrapuntal principles predominate, some
times alternating with passages of a decidedly
harmonic character. In movements which are
not absolute fugues the broad outlines of form
are commonly similar to those already described
as exemplified in Bach's Sonatas, and in the first
and last movements of his ' Concerto dans le
style Italian.' This form in its broadest signi
ficance amounts to a correspondence of well-
defined sections at the beginning and end, with a
long passage of 'free fantasia,' sometimes fugally
developed, in the middle. The clearest example
in these sonatas is the first movement of the
3rd Sonata, in A major, in which the correspond
ing divisions at either end are long, and strongly
673
SONATA.
contrasted in the modern quality and more
simultaneous motion of the parts, with the
elaborate fugal structure of the middle divi
sion. In the last movement of the Sonata in
Bb the corresponding sections are very short,
but the effect is structurally satisfying and clear.
In no case is the structural system of keys used
with anything approaching the clearness of a
pianoforte sonata. Material is contrasted with
material, sometimes simply as subjects or figures,
sometimes even in respect of style ; as a chorale
with recitative, chorale with fugal passages, or
harmonic passages with contrapuntal passages.
Sometimes these are kept distinct, and some
times, as in the first movement of the Sonata in
Bb, they are combined together at the end. The
general laying out of the complete works, though
based on the same broadest radical principles, is
in actual order and manner quite distinct from
that of pianoforte sonatas. The longer movements
alternate with very short ones, which commonly
resemble Romances, Lieder ohne Worte, or such
expressive lyrical types ; and occasionally the
whole sonata concludes with a little movement
of this sort, as no. 3 in A and no. 6 in D.
They are generally in the simplest kind of
primary form with a proportionately important
coda. In point of actual style and treatment of
the instrument there is a great diversity in
different sonatas. In some the solid old contra
puntal style predominates, in similar propor
tion to that in the organ preludes, sonatas,
etc. of Bach ; but this rarely occurs without
some intermixture of modern traits. The most
completely and consistently modern in style is
the Sonata in D major, no. 5, which is practi
cally in three divisions. The first is a chorale,
the second a kind of ' song without words ' in B
minor, and the third a species of fantasia, in
which the sections are balanced by distinct
figures, without more tonal structure than em
phasis upon the principal key at the beginning
and end, and variety of modulation with some
thematic development in the middle. In other
sonatas different modes of writing for the in
strument are used as a means of enforcing the
contrast between one movement and another.
Thus in the 2nd Sonata the first division is a
kind of prelude in a modern manner, chiefly homo-
phonic and orchestral; the second corresponds to
a distinct romance or ' song without words ' with
clearly defined melody and graceful and con
stantly flowing independent accompaniment. In
the third movement, which though in 3-4 time
has something of a march quality, the modern
harmonic character is very prominent, and the
last movement is a fugue. Similar distribution of
styles and modes of writing are as clearly used
in the 1st and 4th Sonatas; in the former
more elaborately.
Among the few attempts which have been
made to add something genuine to the literature
of the Pianoforte Sonata, that in Fjf, op. 1 1, by
Schumann, first published under the pseudonym
of Florestan and Eusebius, is most interesting.
This was clearly an attempt to adapt to the
SONATA.
' sonata-form the so-called romantic ideas of ivhich
Schumann was so prominent and successful a
representative. The outward aspect of the matter
is twofold. First, the absolute subordination of
the sectional distribution to the ideas contained,
and, secondly, the interchange of the subject-
matter so as to connect the movements abso
lutely as well as intrinsically. The first point
is illustrated by the continuity of the Allegro
Vivace and the constant shifting and swaying
of modulation and changing of tempo ; also by
the variety of the subjects and the apparently
irregular manner of their introduction, if judged
from the point of view of the older sonatas. Thus
the part which corresponds to the first section
comprises a first subject, containing a figure
which may be called the text of the movement,
and many subsidiary features and transitions.
The second section follows continuously, with
new matter and allusions to the first subject,
all in a constant sway of transition, till at the
end of the first half of the movement a long
continuous subject in A is reached, which in its
sustained and earnest calmness seems to supply
the point of rest after the long preceding period
of activity. This same subject is the only
one which is given with complete fullness at
the end of the whole movement, the rest of the
subject-matter, though all represented in the
recapitulation, being considerably condensed
and curtailed. The second point is illustrated
by the connection between the introduction and
the two following movements. The introduction
itself is in an elaborate kind of primary form.
Its impressive principal subject is reintroduced
in the middle of the succeeding allegro ; and the
subject of the middle portion serves as the main
staple of the beautiful aria which is the central
movement of the whole sonata. The success of
such things certainly depends on the way in
which they are done, and mere description of
them gives very little impress of their effective
ness in this case. There can hardly be a doubt that
in these devices Schumann hit upon a true means
of applying original thought to the development
of the structural outlines, following the sugges
tion which is really contained in Beethoven's
work, that the structure is perceptible through
the disposition of the ideas, and not only by
emphasising the harmonic sections. The actual
distribution of the structure which is hidden
under the multiplicity of ideas is remarkably
careful and systematic. Even in the develop
ment portion there is method and balance, and
the same is true of large expanses in the last
movement. The freedom with which Schumann
uses subordinate transitions makes the balance
of keys a matter requiring great concentration ;
but it is remarkable in his work, as contrasted
with similar modern examples by other composers,
that he rarely makes random and unrestrained
flights, but keeps within the bounds which make
proportionate balance possible. It is no doubt
a matter of very great difficulty to carry out
such principles as this work seems to embody ;
but if the sonata form be really capable of any
SONATA.
fresh extension it will probably be to a great
extent on such lines.
Schumann's second sonata, in G, op. 22, though
written during almost the same period, seems
to be a retrogression from the position taken
up by that in FjJ. It is possibly a more effective
work, and. from the pianist's point of view, more
capable of being made to sound convincing. And
yet in detail it is not so interesting, nor is it
technically so rich, nor so full and noble in sound.
He seems to aim at orthodoxy with deliberate
purpose, and the result is that though vehement
and vigorous in motion, it is not, for Schumann,
particularly warm or poetical. The second sub
jects of the first and last movements are cha
racteristic, and so is great part of the peculiarly
sectional and epigrammatic scherzo. The an-
dantino also has remarkable points about it, but
is not so fascinating as the slow movement of
the F$ Sonata.
The principles indicated in the sonata opus
II reappear later with better results, as far
as the total impression is concerned, in larger
forms of instrumental music, and also in the D
minor Sonata for violin and pianoforte. In this
there is a close connection between the intro
duction and the most marked feature of the
succeeding quick movement, and similar linking
of scherzo and slow movement by means of a
reference to the subject of the former in the
progress of the latter, with a distinctly poetic
purpose. The Sonata in A for the same combin
ation of instruments is not on such an elaborate
scale, nor has it as many external marks to in
dicate a decided purpose; but it is none the less
poetical in effect, which arises in the first move
ment from the continuity of structure and the
mysterious sadness of spirit which it expresses,
and in the slow movement from its characteristic
tenderness and sweetness.
Liszt, in his remarkable Sonata in B minor
dedicated to Schumann, undoubtedly adopts the
same principles of procedure, and works them
out with more uncompromising thoroughness.
He knits the whole sonata into an unbroken
Unity, with distinct portions passing into one
another, representing the usual separate move
ments. The interest is concentrated upon one
principal idea, to which the usual second subjects
and accessories serve as so many commentaries
and antitheses, and express the influences which
react upon its course. This is further illustrated
by the process sometimes defined as ' transform
ation of themes,' already referred to in con
nection with Beethoven's Sonatas in Bb and Ab;
which is really no more than a fresh way of
applying that art of variation which had been
used from almost the earliest times of sonata-
writing, in recapitulating subjects in the progress
of a moment, as well as in regular set themes
and variations ; though it had not been adopted
before to serve a poetical or ideal conception per
vading and unifying the whole work. In the
actual treatment of the subject-matter, Liszt
adopts, as Beethoven had done, the various op
portunities afforded not only by harmonic struc-
SONATA.
579
ttiral principles, but by the earlier fugal and con
trapuntal devices, and by recitative, adapting
them with admirable breadth and freedom to a
thoroughly modern style of thought. It seems
almost superfluous to add that the purpose is
carried out with absolute mastery of technical
resource, in respect both of the instrument and
of the disposition of the parts of the movement.
The pianoforte sonatas of Brahms are as as
tounding specimens of youthful power and breadth
and dignity of style as exist in the whole range
of the art ; but it must at present be considered
doubtful if they represent his maturer convictions.
Both sonatas appear to have been written before
he arrived at the age of twenty ; and it is probable
that he was then more influenced by the roman
tic theories which Schumann represented, than
he is in his later works, as far as his tendencies
can be judged from their constitution. Conse
quently the fact of the earlier sonatas having
obviously poetic purpose and intent cannot be
taken as any proof that the great mass of his
works (which it is to be hoped will yet be
greatly enlarged and enriched) would justify us
in enrolling him among those who consistently
maintain a poetic conception of instrumental
music. On the other hand, his adoption of shorter
and more individual forms, such as cappriccios,
intermezzi, rhapsodies, in his mature age, lends
at least indirect countenance to the view that the
tendency of music is to subordinate form to idea;
and that if the classical form of the sonata is not
expansible enough, other forms must be accepted
which will admit of more freedom of development.
This implies a question as to the proper meaning
of the word * sonata,' and a doubt as to its being
legitimately assimilable to the tendency to cen
tralise the interest upon the idea, as a contrast to
the old practice of making an equal balance be
tween two main subjects as a means of structural
effect. If the word is to be so restricted, it will
only be another conventional limitation, and, it
may be added, must before long put an end to
further enrichment of the literature of so-called
sonatas.
In the finest of Brahms's two early sonatas, that
in F minor, the first slow movement is headed by
a quotation from a poem of Sternau, and another
movement is called E-iickblick. These are clearly
external marks of a poetical intention. In the
actual treatment of the subjects there is no at
tempt to connect the movements ; but the freedom
of transition, even in the actual progress of a
subject (see the second subject of the first move
ment), is eminently characteristic of the com
poser, and of a liberal view of sonata development.
In the last movement — a rondo — the most
noticeable external mark of continuity is the
elaborately ingenious treatment of the subject
of the second episode in the latter part of the
movement. Brahms has not added further to
the list of solo pianoforte sonatas, but he has
illustrated the tendency to look for fresh oppor
tunities in combinations of solo instruments, as
in his pianoforte quartets and quintet, which are
really just as much sonatas as those usually so
580
SONATA.
designated ; in fact, one of the versions of the
Quintet, which stands as a duet for two piano
fortes, is in that form published as a 'sonata.'
One of the latest examples of his chamber music
is the Sonata for pianoforte and violin. This
requires notice as the work of a great master,
but throws very little light on any sort of exten
sion of the possibilities of sonata-form. There
seems to be a sort of poetic design in the com
plicated arrangement of the first half of the first
movement, in which the characteristic figures of
the first subject reappear, as if to connect each
section with the centre of interest ; and the half
concludes with a complete restatement of the
first subject simply and clearly in the original
key, as is the case also in the same composer's
Serenade in A for small orchestra. It may be
observed in passing that this device curiously re
calls the early composite form, in which the first
subject reappears at the beginning of the second
half [see p. 5596]. There is one other slightly
suggestive point — namely, the reappearance of
the introductory phrase of the slow movement
in one of the episodes of the final Rondo. The
work as a whole is not so large in character, or so
rich in development, as many others of Brahms' s
earlier works in the form of chamber music. This
is probably owing to the unsuitability of the
combination of violin and pianoforte for such
elaboration of structure and mass of sound as is
best adapted to show the composer to the highest
advantage.
Certain traits in his treatment of form, such as
the bold digressions of key at the very outset of
a movement, and the novel effects of transition
in the subjects themselves, have already been
described in the article FORM. It is only neces
sary here to point out that Brahms seems most
characteristically to illustrate the tendency in
modern music which has been styled 'intellect-
ualism'; which is definable as elaborate develop
ment of all the opportunities and suggestions
offered by figures, harmonic successions, or other
essential features of subjects or accessories, so
as to make various portions of the work appear
to grow progressively out of one another. This
sometimes takes the form of thematic develop
ment, and sometimes that of reviving the figures
of one subject in the material or accompaniment
of another, the object being to obtain new aspects
of close and direct logical coherence and con
sistency. Beethoven is the prototype of this
phase of modern music, and the examples of it in
his later instrumental works are of the finest
description. Fortunately the field is a very large
one, and rich in opportunities for composers of
exceptional gifts ; of whom in this department
of art Brahms is certainly the first living repre
sentative. There are several examples which
illustrate this tendency in the F minor Quintet,
which also in its form of a Duo for pianoforte is
called ' Sonata.' One of the most obvious is the
casein which the cadence concluding a paragraph
is formulated, as in the following example at (a),
the phrase being immediately taken up by a dif
ferent instrument and embodied as a most signi-
/-t-BJj—J ^! . 5 . J^v ,
• • ' • f .
4
Vs?
5
*
8
SONATA.
ficant feature in the accessory subject which
follows, as at (6).
(a) Pianoforte.
(6) Violin.
1
lit
SSfc
&
Under the same head of Intellectualism is some
times erroneously included that broad and liberal
range of harmony which characterises the best
composers of the day. This may doubtless call
for intellectual effort in those who are unfamiliar
with the progress of art, or of inexpansive powers
of appreciation, but in the composer it does not
imply intellectual purpose, but only the natural
step onwards from the progressions of harmony
which are familiar to those which are original.
With composers of second rank such freedom is
often experimental, and destructive to the general
balance and proportion of the structure, but with
Brahms it appears to be a special study to bring
everything into perfect and sure proportion, so
that the classical idea of instrumental music may
be still maintained in pure severity, notwith
standing the greater extension and greater variety
of range in the harmonic motion of the various
portions of the movement. In fact Brahms ap
pears now to take his stand on the possibility of
producing new instrumental works of real artistic
value on the classical principles of abstract music,
without either condescending to the popular de
vice of a programme, or accepting the admissi-
bility of a modification of the sonata-form to
suit the impulse or apparent requirements of a
poetical or dramatic principle.
A sonata which bears more obviously on the
direction of modern art in the poetic sense
is that of Sterndale Bennett, called 'The Maid
of Orleans.' This is an example of programme-
music in its purest simplicity. Each of the
four movements has a quotation to explain
its purpose, and in the slow movement the
second section has an additional one. Never
theless the movements are simple adaptations
of the usual forms, the first standing for an in
troduction, the second representing the usual
binary allegro, the third a slow movement in
condensed binary form, and the last a rondo.
There is but little attempt at using any struc
tural means, such as original distribution ot
subject-matter, to enforce the poetic idea : so the
SONATA.
whole can only be taken as an illustration of
a poem in sonata form. But this nevertheless
has some importance, as showing the acceptance
of the aptitude of sonata-form for such purposes
by a composer who was by no means in full
sympathy with the lengths to which Schumann
was prepared to carry the romantic theories.
Among other living composers who treat sonata-
fonn in a poetic fashion, we may name Raff
and Rubinstein. The works of the former are
always admirable in the treatment of the instru
ments, and both composers frequently present
subjects of considerable fascination ; but neither
have that weight or concentration in struc
tural development which would demand detailed
consideration. Poetic treatment is commonly
supposed to absolve the composer from the ne
cessity of attending to the structural elements ;
but this is clearly a misconception. Genuine
beauty in subjects may go far to atone for
deficiency and irrelevancy in the development,
but at best it is only a partial atonement, and
those only are genuine masterpieces in which the
form, be it ever so original, is just as clear and
convincing in the end as the ideas of which it is
the outcome.
The whole process of the development of the
Sonata as an art-form, from its crudest beginnings
to its highest culmination, took nearly two hun
dred years ; and the progress was almost through
out steady, continuous, and uniform in direction.
The earlier history is chiefly occupied by its
gradual differentiation from the Suite-form, with
which for a time it was occasionally confounded.
But there always was a perceptible difference in
the general tendency of the two. The Suite
gravitated towards dance-forms, and movements
which similarly had one principal idea or form
of motion pervading them, so that the balance
of contrasts lay between one movement and
another, and not conspicuously between parts
of the same movement. The Sonata gravitated
towards more complicated conditions and away
from pure dance-forms. Diversity of character
between subjects and figures was admitted early
into single movements, and contrasts of key
were much more strongly emphasised ; and while
in the Suite, except in extremely rare cases,
all the movements were in one key, amongst
the very earliest Sonatas there are examples of a
central movement being cast in a different key
from the rest.
In a yet more important manner the capacity
of the Sonata was made deeper and broader by the
quality and style of its music. In the Suite, as we
have said, the contrasts between one movement
and another were between forms of the same order
and character — that is, between dance- forms and
their analogues ; but in the Sonata the different
movements very soon came to represent different
origins and types of music. Thus in the early
violin sonatas the slow introductory first move
ment generally shows traces of ecclesiastical
influence ; the second, which is the solid kind of
allegro corresponding to the first movement of
modern sonatas, was clearly derived from the
SONATA.
581
secular vocal madrigals, or part music for voices,
through the instrumental canzonas which were
their closest relations. The third, which was the
characteristic slow movement, frequently showed
traces of its descent from solo vocal music of
various kinds, as found in operas, cantatas, or
other similar situations ; and the last move
ment earliest and latest showed traces of dance
elements pure and simple. A further point of
much importance was the early tendency to
wards systematic and distinct structure, which
appears most frequently in the last movement.
The reason for the apparent anomaly is not
hard to find. The only movement in the group
on a scale corresponding to the last was the
second, and this was most frequently of a fugal
disposition. The fugue was a form which was
comparatively well understood when the modern
harmonic forms were still in embryo ; and not
only did it suffice for the construction of move
ments of almost any length, but it did not in
itself suggest advance in the direction of the
sonata kinds of form, though it was shown to be
capable of amalgamation with them when they
in their turn had been definitely brought to
perfection. In the dance movements on the
other hand, when the fugal forms were not used,
all that was supplied as basis to work upon was
the type of motion or rhythm, and the outlines
of structure had to be found. As long as the
movements were on a small scale the structure
which obtained oftenest was the equal balance of
repeated halves without contrasting subjects, of
which the finest examples are to be found in
Bach's Suites. The last movement was in fact
so long a pure suite movement. But when it
began to take larger dimensions, emphasis began
to be laid upon that part of the first half of the
movement which was in the dominant key ; then
the process of characterising it by distinct figures
or subjects became prominent : and by degrees
it developed into the definite second section.
Meanwhile the opening bars of the movement
gradually assumed more distinct and salient
features, making the passage stand out more
clearly from its immediate context ; and in this
form it was repeated at the beginning of the
second half of the movement, the second section
being reserved to make a complete balance by
concluding the whole in a manner analogous to the
conclusion of the first half. So far the change
from the suite type of movement rests chiefly on
the clearer definition of parts, and more positive
exactness in the recapitulation of the subjects ;
but this is quite sufficient to mark the character
as distinct, for in the movements of the Suite
(excluding the prelude) balance of subject and
key were never systematically recognised. The
further development of binary form, in which
the recapitulation of the distinct subjects was
reserved for the conclusion, took some time to
arrive at, but even at this early stage the
essential qualities of sonata -form are clearly
recognisable. The Violin Sonata was naturally
the kind which first attained to perfection, since
that instrument had so great an advantage in
582
SONATA.
point of time over the keyed instruments used
for similar purposes ; and its qualities and re
quirements so reacted upon the character of
the music as to make it appear almost a dis
tinct species from the Clavier Sonata. But in
fact the two kinds represent no more than
divergence from a similar source, owing to the
dissimilar natures of the instruments. Thus
the introductory slow movement was most ap
propriate to the broad and noble character of the
violin, and would appeal at once by its means to
an audience of any susceptibility ; whereas to
the weak character of the early keyed instru
ments, so deficient in sustaining power, it was
in general inappropriate, and hence was dropped
very early. For the same reason in a consider
able proportion of the early clavier sonatas,
the third or principal slow movement was also
dropped, so that the average type of sonatas for
clavier was for a time a group of two move
ments, both generally in a more or less quick
time. In these the canzona movement was early
supplanted by one more in accordance with the
modern idea, such as is typified in the clavier
sonata of Galuppi in four movements [see
p. 563], and by occasional allemandes in the
earlier sonatas. As keyed instruments improved
in volume and sustaining power the central
slow movement was resumed ; but it was neces
sary for some time to make up for deficiencies in
the latter respect by filling in the slow beats
with elaborate graces and trills, and such orna
ments as the example of opera-singers made
rather too inviting. The course of the violin
solo-sonata was meanwhile distinctly maintained
till its climax, and came to an abrupt end in
J. S. Bach, just as the clavier sonata was ex
panding into definite importance. In fact the
earliest landmarks of importance are found in
the next generation, when a fair proportion of
works of this class show the lineaments of clavier
sonatas familiar to a modern. Such are the dis
position of the three movements with the solid
and dignified allegro at the beginning, the ex
pressive slow movement in the middle, and the
bright and gay quick movement at the end ; which
last continued in many cases to show its dance
origin. From this group the fugal element was
generally absent, for all the instinct of composers
was temporarily enlisted in the work of per
fecting the harmonic structure in the modern
manner, and the tendency was for a time to
direct special attention to this, with the ob
ject of attaining clear and distinct symmetry.
In the latter part of the i8th century this
was achieved ; the several movements were
then generally cast on nearly identical lines,
with undeviating distribution of subjects, pauses,
modulations, cadences, and double bars. The
style of thought conformed for a while sufficiently
well to this discipline, and the most successful
achievements of instrumental music up to that
time were accomplished in this manner. Ex-
trinsically the artistic product appeared per
fect ; but art could not stand still at this point,
and composers soon felt themselves precluded
SONATA.
from putting the best and most genuine of
their thoughts into trammels produced by such
regular procedure. Moreover the sudden and
violent changes in social arrangements which
took place at the end of the century, and the
transformation in the ways of regarding life and
its interests and opportunities which resulted
therefrom, opened a new point of public emotion,
and introduced a new quality of cosmopolitan
human interest in poetry and art. The appeal
of music in its higher manifestations became
more direct and immediate ; and the progression
of the idea became necessarily less amenable to
the control of artificialities of structure, and more
powerful in its turn of reacting upon the form.
This is what lies at the root of much which, for
want of a more exact word, is frequently described
as the poetic element, which has become so
prominent and indispensable a quality in modern
music. By this change of position the necessities
of structural balance and proportion are not sup
planted, but made legitimate use of in a different
manner from what they previously were ; and
the sonata-form, while still satisfying the indis
pensable conditions which make abstract music
possible, expanded to a fuller and more coordinate
pitch of emotional material. Partly under these
influences, and partly no doubt owing to the
improvements in keyed instruments, the Clavier
Sonata again attained to the group of four move
ments, but in a different arrangement from that
of the Violin Sonata. The slow introduction
was sometimes resumed, but without represent
ing an ingredient in the average scheme. The
first movement was usually the massive and
dignified Allegro. The two central portions,
consisting of a highly expressive slow movement
and the scherzo, which was the legitimate de
scendant of the dance movement, were ruled in
their order of succession by the qualities of the
first and last movements, and the work ended
with a movement which still generally main
tained the qualities to be found in a last move
ment of Corelli or Tartini. The tendency to
unify the whole group increased, and in so far as
the influence of intrinsic character or of the idea
became powerful it modified the order and quality
of the movements. For particular purposes
which approve themselves to musical feeling the
number of movements varied considerably, some
exceedingly fine and perfect sonatas having
only two, and others extending to five. Again,
it is natural that in certain moods composers
should almost resent the call to end with the
conventional light and gay movement ; and con
sequently in later works, even where the usual
form seems to be accepted, the spirit is rather
ironical than gay, and rather vehement or even
fierce than light-hearted. The same working
of the spirit of the age had powerful effect on the
intrinsic qualities of the Scherzo ; in which there
came to be found, along with or under the veil
of ideal dance motions, sadness and tenderness,
bitterness, humour, and many more phases of
strong feeling ; for which the ideal dance rhythms,
when present, are made to serve as a vehicle;
SONATA.
but in some cases also are supplanted by
different though kindred forms of expression.
In other respects the last movement moved fur
ther away from the conventional type, as by the
adoption of the fugal form, or by new use of the
Variation-form in a more continuous and con
sistent sense than in early examples. In many
cases the movements are made to pass into one
another, just as in the earlier stages the strong
lines which marked off the different sections in
the movements were gradually toned down ; and
by this means they came to have less of the
appearance of separate items than limbs or divi
sions of a complete organism. This is illustrated
most clearly by the examples of slow movements
•which are so modified as to be little more than
Intermezzi, or introductory divisions appended
to the last movement ; and more strongly by a
few cases where the distinct lines of separation
are quite done away with, and the entire work
becomes a chain of long divisions representing
broadly the old plan of four distinct movements
with kindred subjects continuing throughout.
Since Beethoven the impetus to concentrate
and individualise the character of musical works
has driven many genuine composers to the adop
tion of forms which are less hampered by any
suspicion of conventionality ; and even with
sonatas they seemed to have grasped the object
in view with less steadiness and consistency
than in previous times. Some have accepted
the artifice of a programme, others admit some
doubtful traits of theatrical origin; others de
velop poetic and sesthetic devices as their chief
end and object, and others still follow up the
classical lines, contenting themselves with the
opportunities afforded by new and more elabo
rately perfect treatment of details, especially in
music for combinations of solo instruments. In
the latter case it is clear that the field is more
open than in sonatas for single instruments,
since the combination of such instruments as the
pianoforte and violin or pianoforte and cello in
large works has not been dealt with by the
great masters so thoroughly and exhaustively
as the solo sonata. But in any case it is ap
parent that fresh works of high value on the
classical lines can hardly be produced without
increasing intellectualism. The origin and reason
of existence of abstract music are, at least on
one side, intellectual ; and though up to a cer
tain point the process -of development tended to
reduce the intellectual effort by making the
structural outlines as clear and certain as pos
sible, when these were decisively settled the
current naturally set in the direction of compli
cation. The inevitable process of cumulating
one device of art upon another is shown in the
free range of modulation and harmony, and in
the increasing variety and richness of detail both
in the subjects and in the subordinate parts of
works. In such cases the formal outlines may
cease to be strictly amenable to a definite external
theory; but if they accord with broad general
principles, such as may be traced in the history
of abstract music so far, and if the total effect is
SONATINA.
583
extrinsically as well as intrinsically complete and
convincing, it appears inevitable to admit the
works to the rank of 'Sonatas.' The exact
meaning of the term has in fact been enforced
with remarkable uniformity during the whole
period from the beginning to the present day,
and decisively in favour of what is called abstract
music. Fair examples of the successful disregard
of form in favour of programme or a dramatic
conception can hardly be found ; in fact, in
the best examples extant, programme is no more
than the addition of a name or a story to an
otherwise regular formal sonata ; but on the
other hand there is plenty of justification of the
finest kind for abstract works in free and more
original forms, and it rests with composers to
justify themselves by their works, rather than
for reasoning to decide finally where the limit
shall be. [C.H.H.P.]
SONATINA. This is a work in the same form
and of the same general character as a sonata, but
shorter, simpler, and slenderer. The average form
of the sonata appears to be the most successful
yet discovered for pure instrumental works of
large scope. It is admirably adapted for the
expression and development of broad and noble
ideas ; and the distribution of the various move
ments, and the clearness with which the main
sections and divisions of each movement are
marked out, give it a dignity and solidity which
seem most appropriate in such circumstances.
But the very clearness of the outlines, and the
strength of contrast between one division and
another, make the form less fit for works of
smaller scope. As long as such a work is
laid out on a scale sufficiently large to admit
variety of treatment and freedom of movement
within the limits of these divisions, there is
fair chance of the work having musical value
proportionate to the composer's capacity ; but
if the limits are so narrow as to admit little
more than mere statement of the usual form,
and no more than the conventional order of
modulations, the possibilities of musical sense
and sentiment are reduced to a minimum, and a
want of positive musical interest commonly re
sults. Consequently sonatinas form one of the
least satisfactory groups of musical products.
The composers who have produced the greatest
impression with short and concise movements in
modern times have uniformly avoided them, and
adopted something of a more free and lyrical cast,
in which there is a more appropriate kind of unity,
and more of freedom and individuality in the
general outlines. It might be quite possible to
group these small pieces so as to present a very
strong analogy to the sonata on a small scale ;
but it has not been attempted, owing possibly to
a feeling that certain limitations of style and
character are generally accepted in the musical
world as appropriate for works of the sonata
class, and that it would be superfluous to violate
them.
The sonatina form has however proved pe
culiarly convenient for the making of pieces
intended to be ut,ed in teaching. The familiar
584
SONATINA.
outlines and the systematic distribution of the
principal harmonies afford the most favourable
opportunities for simple but useful finger-pas
sages, for which the great masters have supplied
plentiful formulas ; and they furnish at the same
time excellent means of giving the student a
dignified and conscientious style, and a clear
insight into the art of phrasing. These works
may not have any strong interest of a direct kind
for the musical world, but they have consider
able value in so far as they fulfil the purposes
they are meant to serve. The most famous and
most classical examples of this kind are de
menti's sonatinas, of ops. 36, 37, and 38. And
much of the same character are several by
F. Kuhlau, which are excellently constructed
and pure in style. Of modern works of a similar
kind there are examples by L. Koehler. Those
by Carl Reinecke and Hermann Goetz are equally
adapted for teaching purposes, and have also in
general not a little agreeable musical sentiment,
and really attractive qualities. Some of Beetho
ven's works which are not definitely described as
such are sufficiently concise and slight to be
called sonatinas : as for instance those in G and
G minor, op. 49, which were first announced for
publication as 'Senates faciles' in 1805. That
in G major, op. 79, was published as a 'Sona-
tine' in 1810, though it is rather larger in most
respects than the other little examples. Another
' sonatina ' by him for mandolin, with pianoforte
accompaniment, is given at vol. ii. p. 205 of
this Dictionary. Prior to Beethoven the average
scale of sonatas was so small that it seems
difficult to see how a diminutive could be con
trived ; and indeed the grand examples which
made the degrees of comparison specially con
spicuous were not yet in existence. A modern
work on such a scale, and made in the conven
tional manner, would probably be considered as
a Sonatina, and apart from teaching purposes
it would also be likely to be an anachron
ism. [C.H.H.P.]
SONG. In relation to the study of music, a
Song may be defined as a short metrical compo
sition, whose meaning is conveyed by the com
bined force of words and melody, and intended
to be sung with or without an accompaniment.
The Song, therefore, belongs equally to poetry and
music. For the purposes of this Dictionary the
subject should undoubtedly be treated with ex
clusive regard (were it possible) to music ; but
the musical forms and structure of songs are so
much determined by language and metre, that
their poetic and literary qualities cannot be
entirely put aside. In the strictest sense, lyrical
pieces alone are songs ; but adherence to so nar
row a definition would exclude many kinds of
songs whose importance in the history of music
demands that they should be noticed here. At
tention, however, will be directed only to homo-
phonic forms of songs — i. e. songs for one voice or
unisonous chorus. Polyphonic forms — madrigals,
glees, part-songs, etc. — fall under other heads of
this work, to which the reader will be referred.
Mention will likewise be made only of songs in
SONG.
the language of the composer of their music, and
with accompaniment for one instrument.
A distinction will also, as far as possible, be
observed between songs which are, as it were,
the rude spontaneous outcome of native in
spiration, the wild indigenous fruit of their
own soil, and those other more regular and
finished compositions which are written with
conscious art by men who have made music
their study. For want of a better term it will
be convenient, where the difference must be em
phasized, to designate this class of songs by the
German phrase Kunstlied, or Artistic Song;
while the former class, whose origin and au
thorship are generally obscure, may be called
National or Popular Songs. Such are the Folks-
lieder of Germany, the Canti Popolari of Italy,
and the Ballads of England.
It should, moreover, be mentioned that the
heads or subdivisions under which songs will
be ranged must be geographical rather than
chronological ; that is to say, they will be
grouped in regard to country and not to period.
For the study of any other branch of modern
music among the leading nations of Europe,
a chronological arrangement would probably be
more useful and instructive, because at each
successive epoch their musical productions have
been sufficiently similar to admit of collective
treatment. But the Song is that branch of music
in which national peculiarities linger longest, and
international affinities grow most slowly. This
is, of course, primarily due to the fact that lan
guage, which is local, is an integral element of
song. Secondly, it is caused by the popular
origin of songs. Being of the people and for the
people, they flourish most in a sphere where the
influences of foreign example and teaching can
hardly reach them. Hence it happens that even
where the Artistic Song has lost every trace of
its native soil, national melodies preserve a dis
tinctively local colour. In some countries of
Europe the development of the Song can be
followed from the primitive form of folk-song to
the highest type of artistic composition ; but in
others the art of music has scarcely yet advanced
beyond the stage of national melodies.
It remains only to add that, although the
year 1450 has been fixed in the preface to this
Dictionary as a convenient point of departure
for a general study of modern music, an account
of the Song in Europe would be incomplete
without, at least, a brief reference to the Trou
badours, whose epoch was anterior to that date.
TROUBADOURS.
These versifiers, to whom the Song owes so
much, derived their name from 'trobar' or
'trouver' (to find, or * invent), and they first
appeared about the end of the nth century,
in the southern provinces of France. The
earliest of the Troubadours on record was Wil
liam, Duke of Guienne, who joined the first
Crusade in 1096 and died in 1126. The I2th
and 1 3th centuries gave birth to hundreds of
i Thus In Greek the poet was the TTOUJTIJS, or ' maker.'
SONG.
them, but their prime was past when the
Troubadour Academy of Toulouse was founded
for the culture and preservation of their art.
That Academy, known as "The Seven Main-
tainers of the Gay Science ' was founded in the
year 1320, and a few years later was visited by
Petrarch.
Some strong impulse was evidently given to
the human mind in Europe towards the close
of the nth century, and the songs of the
Troubadours, like the numerous schools of philo-
Bophy which illustrated the I2th century, were
fruits of an awakened ardour for intellectual
pursuits. It was not unnatural that in Lan-
guedoc and Provence the new life should espe
cially manifest itself in music and verse, for the
circumstances of those provinces were favourable
to the development of sentiment and imagination.
The leisure that is bred of peace and plenty was
to be found there, for the country was prosperous
and comparatively undisturbed by internal war
fare. Its climate was sunny, and its people
prone to gaiety and luxury. The spirit of the
age of chivalry had refined their manners, and
their flexible and melodious language — the
Langue d'Oc or Romance tongue — was admir
ably fitted for lighter forms of poetic compo
sition. The Proven9al Troubadours were thus
able to invent a variety of metrical arrange
ments, perfectly new to Europe. As might have
been expected from their southern temperament
and the customs of that chivalrous time, their
effusions were principally love-songs. Satires,
and panegyrics, exhortations to the crusade,
and religious odes came to be intermingled with
amatory poems ; but love, which first inspired
the song of the Troubadour, ever remained its
favourite theme. The very names by which
different classes of songs were distinguished
reveal their origin. In the pastourelle the poet
was feigned to meet and woo a shepherdess.
The alba and serena, morning and evening
songs, were obviously aubades and serenades.
The tensons, or contentions, were metrical dia
logues of lively repartee on some disputed point
of gallantry. And the servente was of course
an address of the devoted lover to his mistress.
To this last form of composition, which was
also much employed in satire, a special celebrity
belongs from the fact that its metre — the terza
ritna or rhyme of alternate lines — was adopted
by Dante for his 'Divina Commedia,' and by
Petrarch in his ' Trionfi.' To the Troubadours
likewise may be ascribed the canzo and canzone,
the soula (solatium, soulagemenf), a merry
amusing song, and the lai (lay), which was
wont to be suffused with melancholy. The
invention of the Troubadours was not less fertile
in dance-songs, combining solo and chorus. Such
were the famous carol or rondet de carol
(Lat. chorea), and the espringerie or jumping
dance. From the same source sprang the
lallata, or ballad, which, as its name implies,
was also a dance song.
During their palmy era, the Troubadours
would seem to have been for the most part
SONG.
585
men of gentle birth and high rank ; and there
was no reward which they would deign to
receive for their works but fame and the ap
plause of the ladies to whom their homage was
paid. At first, perhaps, they saug their own
verses ; but the functions of the poet and the
singer soon became distinct. Hence a class of
professional musicians came to be attached to
the retinue of princes and nobles, and they
sang the songs of their own lords or other
composers. They were known as 'Jongleurs'
or ' Chanteors ' ; or if their sole business was to
be instrumental accompanyists of dances, they
were called ' Estrumanteors.' To the musical
accomplishments out of which their profession
arose, the Jongleurs soon added other modes
of popular diversion, such as juggling and acro
batic feats, and they were of course paid for
the entertainment which they gave. It was
their habit also to wander from country to
country, and court to court. Inferior, there
fore, as the Jongleur was to the Troubadour,
the celebrity of the latter depended much on,
the former, and we can understand the earnest
ness with which Pierre d'Auvergne and other
Troubadours entreated their Jongleurs not to
alter their verses and melodies.
The rise of the Troubadours proper in southern
France was quickly followed by the appearance
of a corresponding class of versifiers in northern
France and in Spain. In northern France they
were called 'Trouveres,' and they wrote in the
Langue d'O'il. There was less gaiety about the
northern Troubadours than about the southern,
but in other respects the resemblance between
them was very close. The 'Menetrier' or
'Ministrel' of the north corresponded to the
Jongleur of the south ; but the Menetrier seems
to have attained and kept a higher standard of
culture and taste than the Jongleur. Indeed
several poets of mark were Menetriers. At the
courts of our own Norman kings the Trouvere's
art was held in honour. Henry I. was a votary
of literature ; Henry II. studiously encouraged
poetry ; and Richard Cceur de Lion was him
self a Trouvere.
Among illustrious Troubadours or Trouveres
of the 1 2th and ijth centuries whose names
survive, there were (besides William Duke
of Guienne, and Richard I.) Pierre Rogier ;
Bernart de Ventadour ; Bertran de Born ; Ar-
naut Daniel; Guirant de Borneil; the Chatelain
de Coucy ; Blondel des Nerles ; Thibaut de
Champagne, King of Navarre, etc. Many of
their melodies have come down to us. The
earliest are stiff, but the flowing grace and ease
of the later compositions indicate a rapid im
provement. Even about so old a piece as the
Chatelain de Coucy's famous 'Quant le rossignol*
there is a charm of pretty sentiment, but its
merit is inferior to that of Thibaut's 'L'Autrie'r
par la matine'e.1 We cite them both as il
lustrations of Troubadour music.1
1 Burney and Feme put these examples Into modern notation, and
•where they differ, Barney's are the small notes. See Ambros, ' Ge-
schichte,' ii. 224—228.
586
SONG.
Quant le Rossipnnl.
CHATELAIN DE Corcv.
Quant li lou - sei
- gnolz jo - lis chante
.
sur la flor
d'e - st6.
que naist la ro - se
plains de bon - ne vo - len-t& chanteral
confins a -
- mis mais dl tant suls es-ba - his
=£=;=--
J'al si tres haut pen - - s& qu'a pain es iert accom-
-#— «-
pi is 11 - - ser - virs dont jai - 6 gr&.
L'Autricr par la matinc'e.
(Le Roi) THIBAUT DE NAVARRE.
• — ,— •— »-]— )— UlcEjl
L'autrier per la ma-tl - ne'e ent'r un bos et un vergier
et disait un son premier chi mitientll mais d'a - mor
£fef£^
^S^SS
Taiitost eel - le par en -tor ka. je loi
de frainier
si li dis sans de - lal-er: Belle, dies vous doint bon jour.
The melodies of the Spanish "Trobadores '
were naturally very similar to those of the Pro-
ven9al Troubadours, and their system of notation
was precisely the same. Spain too, like France,
counted kings and princes among her Troba
dores ; such as Alphonso II., Peter III., and
Alphonso X. The last has left 400 poems which,
with their melodies, are still preserved in the
Escurial.
Italy was more slowly caught by the poetic
flame. Towards the middle of the I3th cen
tury, Raymond Berenger, Count of Provence,
visited the Emperor Frederick II. at Milan,
bringing Troubadours and Jongleurs in his train;
and not until then do we hear of them in Italy.
A similar patronage was extended to them by
Raymond's son-in-law Charles of Anjou, King
of Naples and Sicily. To the common people of
Italy these singers appeared as retainers of
princely courts, and they called them uomini
di corii. They also called them ciarlatani, be-
SONG.
cau?e the exploits of Charlemagne were a con
stant theme of their songs, and the word ciarle
stood for 'Charles' in Italian pronunciation.
Thus taught by foreigners, Italy soon produced
her own 'Trovatori' and 'Giocolini.' But the
first Italian Trovatori deemed their own dialect
to be unsuitable to poetry, and wrote in the
Proven9al language. This practice, however,
was not destined to last, for in the year 1265
Dante, the founder of the Italian language, was
born. After him no Italian could longer doubt
the capacities of his own tongue for all forms of
poetry ; and the verse of the Troubadour began
to 'pale an uneffectual fire' before the splen
dours of the great poet of the Middle Ages.
Henceforward the history of the Song will be
separately traced in the different countries of
Europe, beginning with Italy.
ITALY.
Notwithstanding the subordination of lyric
song to other branches of music in Italy, her
long and careful study of 'la melica poesia'
— poetry wedded to music — has not been sur
passed elsewhere. Dante's sonnets and Pe
trarch's Trionfi, to which allusion has been made
above, were among the earliest poems set to
music. Dante's own contemporary and friend,
Casella, who set his sonnet 'Amor che nella
mente' to music, is believed to have also com
posed the music for a Ballata by Lemino da
Pistoja, still extant in the Vatican. Both the
Ballate and Intuonate were very old forms of
composition, and both were love-songs sung to
a dance *. After them the Maggiolate, or May
day songs, had their hour of popularity. These
also were love-songs, and bands of young men
sang them in springtime as they danced before the
windows of the ladies whom they wooed. Later
yet the Canti Carnas dales chi came into vogue.
Originally they were mere carnival songs, but
under the skilful hand of Lorenzo de' Medici a
kind of consecutive drama grew out of them.
During the 1 4th century there existed a class
of dilettante musicians called Cantori a liuto ;
and these were distinct from the Cantori a
libro who were more learned musicians. It
was the habit of the former class to improvise,
for until the i6th century musical notation re
mained so complex and difficult, that only ac
complished musicians were able to write down
their songs.
In the 1 5th century, compositions of the
Netherlands school of music, with their severe
contrapuntal style, found their way into Italy,
and began to exercise an influence there ; but
the prevailing type of Italian secular songs
continued to be of a very light order. Petrucci,
the first musical publisher, who published in
1502 the motets and masses of the Netherlands
composers, had nothing better to offer of native
productions than the Frottole, tuneful but fri
volous part-songs. Similar in levity were the
i Arteaga, in his 'Le Kivoluzioni del Teatro Musicale Ttallano.1
gives the words of a Rallata of the ]Sth century by Frederick II.; and
of another Valletta by Dante. (See pp. Ib7 and 190.)
SONG.
rust'c songs, Canzoni Villaneftcne, or Villanelle,
or Villotte, which peasants and soldiers sang as
drinking-songs. In form the Villanelle adhered
to the contrapuntal style, though in spirit they
were essentially popular. More refined and yet
more trifling were the Villotte alia Napoletana,1
gallant addresses from singing-masters to their
feminine pupils. The so-called Fa-la-la was a
composition of somewhat later date, and more
merit. Those which Gastoldi wrote (about 1591)
were good ; so too were his Balletti. Gradually
the term Frottola disappeared; the more serious
Frottole passed into the MadrigaU, while the
gayer and merrier type was merged in the
Villanella. A Frottola, printed in Junta's
Roman collection of 1526, evidently became ere
long a Villanella, for it is still sung in Venice
with the same words and melody, 'Le son tre
fanticelli, tutti tre da maridar.' Originally it
was a part-song, with the melody in the tenor.
The Villanelle were, as a rule, strophical — the
same melody repeated in each stanza — but the
Frottole had different music for each verse.
The vocal music, to which our attention has
thus far been directed, consisted either of part-
songs or unisonous chorus, with little or no
accompaniment. Sometimes the principal or
upper voice had a sort of cantilena, but solo-
singing was still unknown. The first instance
of it is supposed to have occurred in 1539, in
an Intermezzo, in which Sileno sings the upper
part of a madrigal by Corteccio, accompanying
himself on the violone, while the lower parts,
which represented the Satyrs, are taken by
wind instruments. But the piece itself shows
that it was far from being a song for one voice
with accompaniment. It will be noticed that
the under parts are as much independent voices
SONG.
5S7
as tne upper one.
Fragment of a Madrigal.
Sonato da Sileno con violone, sonando tutte le parti,
e cantando U Soprano.
1st Tenor. Sileno. CORTECCIO, 1539.
ffi^-^71^-
t=M P±
:-^ &-\
_- "P .P pj
0 begl' an - ni de
To - ro
O se - col
A,^U_ ^j_
:^i j | -f^
~~~ — ^' ! ^~|
V>U j D
^ ^i — fy—s>-\
G*~^$/^ C?Cs
^-^^—<^>-\
^=^ — =r
; r; TT
i
1 — i
r
^-iH-iJ
, —
£7
•«^
— ^.
-^ — iS* ^i-'
— * • 7—
-—^ ^—
1
^EEF^
~f~f — ^
di - vo
al - lor
^— —
non rastr'o
Fn — zl — j — r
H 1 '
falce al -
rfcg^ri&B
422 ^^
^^~^^~
^^ =^-
-Bj9 Sj-^— - p-
^~—
Lj=2 .JT- Up-0(Ss.
& & 1
1 1
i IT
~^~&
-?-&-^ —
-^j — 1 1-
- =t=^
i & — S^ G) -1
1 For examples by Cambio (Ifi47) and Donati (about the same
late), see Kiesewetter's 'Schicksale und Besehaffenheitdesweltlichen
*esanges,' Appendices Nos. xxii. and xxiii. Several collections of
Vtllanelle still eiist, and amongst others an important one in Naples.
1r&
lor non e - ra
vis -co ne lac - clo
etc.
According to the historian Doni, Galilei was
the first composer who wrote actual melodies for
one voice. Doni further tells us that Galilei
set to music the passage of the ' Inferno' which
narrates the tragic fate of Count Ugolino, and
that he performed it himself 'very pleasingly*
with viola accompaniment. But be that as it
may, an epoch in musical history was undoubtedly
marked by Giulio Caccini, when he published,
in 1601, under the title of 'Le Nuove Musiche,'
a collection of MadrigaU, Canzoni, and Arie
for one voice. These compositions have a figured
bass, and some are embellished with jioriture.
Caccini was promptly followed in the path which
he had opened by numerous imitators, and thus
the monodic system was virtually established.
Indeed he may be regarded as the inventor of
the ' expressive monodia,' for he was the first to
attempt to render certain thoughts and feelings
in music, and to adapt music to the meaning of
words. Caccini is said to have sung his own
pieces, accompanying himself on the theorbo ;
and in the preface to his collection he gives
minute directions as to the proper mode of singing
them. The airs are well supplied with marks of
expression, as the following example from his
' Nuove Musiche ' will show : —
(Scemar di voce. Esclamazione spiritosa.) ~
Deh!
Deh!
do - ve son fug - gi - ti
E5E
4-
(fscl. piu viva)
' 1* A ' _^
1 o B <^
iW «
deh ! do - ve son spa - ri
6
• tl gl'oc - - - chi de quali er -
, * * 6
i : :
^ - a p
— J J J ! B>d
(fscl.)
(trillo)
t
- ra - i )o son ce - nere o - ma - 1 Au - re
(Senza misura, quis> favellando, in ar-
monia con la suddstta sprezzatura.)'2
Mrillo)
au-re di - vi-ne ch'er-ra-te pe-re-gri-ne in questa parte e quel -
^L tl
2 ' Without keepine to the time, as if speaking in accordance with
the already expjebsed disdain.'
588
SONG.
SONG.
la, deh re • ca-te no-vel - la dell' al - ma lu - ce
^
3
, con misura
Tpiii lartja.)
I.
(trillo)
II J ^j J_J^.^E;
7^ '
lo - ro, au - re, ch'io me-ne mo
* *
- - - ro deh re •
:+j_^.j-j-j4-
£. rm/.)
(trillo una mezza battuta)
au - re ch'io
mene mo
ro.
Another example, and further information,
will be found in the article on MONODIA.
Caccini also prepared the way for the Cantata,
which subsequently reached its highest perfec
tion under Carissimi, Stradella, Scarlatti, and
others. [See CANTATA.] The composers of the
transition period, which witnessed the growth of
the Cantata, were Radesca da Foggia, who pub
lished five books of ' Monodie' in 1616 ; Brunelli,
who published in the same year two books of
'Scherzi, Arie, Canzonette e Madrigali'; F. Ca
pello, whose most remarkable work was a set of
' Madrigali a voce sola ' ; Fornacci, celebrated for
his 'Amorosi respiri musicali' which appeared
in 1617 ; Luigi Rossi,1 and Salvator Rosa.*
If Corteccio's madrigal be compared with the
following example from Capello's 'Madrigali a
voce sola,' it will be seen how great a change and
advance had been made in solo- singing during
less than a century. And a striking resemblance
may be observed between Capello and his suc
cessor Stradella.
Madrigale a voce sola.
GIOVANNI FRANCESCO CAPELLO.
1 For the existing collections of Rossi's ' Monodie ' see the article on
EOS3I.
2 Salvator Rosa certainly was Carissimi's contemporary, but the
examples Buruey gives in his History show that he wrote much like
the abuvemeutioued composers.
^ • a_i? fs;
\ ~~r~
r i
_C_ — | — 1
dol - ci pal
— ! • 0 \)*3
• lo - rl
| | •
per - de
1'al - ba ver -
— i | ~
^ F~~ &
— Z3 ^~
-- — — s-j
-<s>-
1
~7y -S*-
1
^ •
' — ?n
~ — .
- mi - glia i suoi co - lo • - • rl
The popular taste in music at any period can
best be ascertained from the class of compositions
which publishers then found to be most in de
mand. Thus Petrucci, at the beginning of the
1 6th century, was issuing Frottole, Villanelle,
etc., but a hundred years later the Venetian
publisher Vincento supplied the public with
little pieces like those above-mentioned by Fog-
gia, Capello, etc. The Madrigal and the Can
tata were both important, at least as regards
chamber-music, during the 1 6th and I7th cen
turies ; but they were soon doomed to insignifi
cance by the rise of a great and overshadowing
rival, namely the Opera. For an account of the
origin of the Opera and its marvellous popularity
the reader must turn to the article on OPERA.
It need only be said here that all other kinds
of secular vocal music had to yield precedence
in Italy to it and its offshoots, the Scena, the
Cavatina, the Aria, etc. Ambros says that the
Arie of early Operas were simply monodic Villa-
nelle, Villotte, or Canzoni alia Napoletana; but
he also tells us that favourite 'couplets' from
Operas, which at first had nothing in common
with Cantipopolari beyond being melodies easily
caught by the ear, acquired by degrees a place
similar to that held by the Volkslied in Germany.
Nevertheless, it is clear that Italian musicians
held the popular songs of other countries in
higher estimation than their own. The best
songs in Petrucci's ' Canti Cento -cinquanta,'
published in 1503, belong to France, Germany,
and the Netherlands. And Italian masters pre
ferred French or Gallo-Belgian themes for their
masses.3 Traces, no doubt, of Canti popolari
may be found in Italian compositions of the I5th
and 1 6th centuries — as, for instance, in Adrian
Willaert's 'Canzon di Kuzante' — but very few of
them have come down to us in their complete or
native form. Canzoni alia Francese* (as they
3 'L'Homme arm4 ' Is a well-known example.
* The Canzoni alia Franceae were mustly written In four parts;
many of them were canons.
SONG.
SONG.
689
were called) were popular in Italy early in the
1 6th century. Of the popular hymns of Italy
during the Middle Ages mention has been made
under LAUDI SPIRITDALI.
Materials for a satisfactory treatment of the
Canti popolari of Italy do not exist. Though
much has been written about their words, no
treatise exists on their tunes. Neither does
there appear to be any collection which can
safely be trusted to give us veritable old songs.
Of late years large collections of modern Canti
popolari have been published, such as the
Canzonette Veneziane, Stornelli Toscani, Canti
Lombardi, Napoletani, Siciliani, etc. ; and as
their titles indicate, these publications purport
to be collections of local songs in the several
provinces of Italy. But whether they can be
accepted as the genuine productions which they
profess to be, is questionable. They would
rather seem to be new compositions or new
arrangements and developments of old popular
tunes. Moreover it is very doubtful whether
any of them are really sung by the peasants of the
districts to which they are attributed, except the
Canti Lombardi. The melodies at least of these
are for the most part genuine.
A far stronger claim than any which the songs
of these collections can put forward to the title
of Canti popolari, may be advanced in favour of
countless popular melodies taken from favourite
Operas. The immense popularity of operatic
tunes in Italy cannot surprise us when we re
member that the theatre is there an ubiquitous
institution, and that the quick ear of the Italian
instantly catches melodies with a distinct rhythm
and an easy progression of intervals. Again, the
chorus- singers of the Opera are often chosen
from among the workmen and labourers of the
place ; and thus even difficult choruses may be
heard in the streets and suburbs of towns which
possess a theatre. Having regard, therefore, to
the wide diffusion of the Opera in Italy, and its
influence on all classes during two centuries and
a half, it is reasonable to conclude that it must
have checked the normal development of popular
songs, and also, perhaps, obliterated the traces
of old tunes. A good instance of the conversion
of a theatrical melody not only into a popular,
but even into a national song, is afforded by
Monti's verses ' Bella Italia, amate sponde.'
These were adapted in 1859 to the Cabaletta of
the basso, in the first act of Bellini's ' Sonnam-
bula,' 'Tu no' 1 sai, con quei begli occhi,' and
were to be heard in every place of public resort
in Northern Italy.
The so-called Canti nazionali belong to a
period commencing about the year 1821. They
have all been inspired by the political move
ments of this century for the regeneration of
Italy, and their tone is naturally warlike. The
most celebrated of them are ' Addio, mia bella,
addio,' which is an adaptation of Italian words
to ' Partant pour la l Syrie ' ; ' Daghela avanti un
1 This adaptation was probably made during the war of 1859, In
which France assisted Italy to liberate herself from the yoke of
Austria.
2passo,' a ballet song written by Paolo Giorza in
1858; 'Oh, dolce piacer, goder liberta'; 'Inno
di Mameli ' ; ' Fratelli d' Italia ' ; 'La bandiera
tricolore ' ; ' All' armi, All' armi,' by Pieri ; and
the 'Inno di Garibaldi.' The years in which
Italy was most deeply stirred by struggles for
independence were 1821, 1848, and 1859, and all
the songs just cited can be traced to one or other
of those revolutionary periods.
The harmonic and formal structure of the
Canti popolari is usually very simple. They
are very rarely sung in parts, though sometimes
an under part is added in thirds. Their accom
paniments are also extremely simple. A weak
and very modern colouring is imparted to the
harmony by an excessive use of the chord of the
dominant seventh ; but otherwise the harmony
adheres to the tonic chords, and very seldom
modulates into anything except the nearest re
lated keys. No Canti popolari written in the
old scales are extant ; indeed, since the time of
Caccini their emancipation from the ecclesias
tical modes has been complete. The form and
rhythm of the songs are equally simple, con
sisting of four-bar phrases ; the time is more fre
quently 3-8 or 6-8 than common time. The poetry
is in stanzas of four lines, the accents occurring
regularly, even in provincial dialects ; and the
songs are generally strophical — that is, the melody
is repeated for each stanza. It should be added, to
avert misconception, that the terms Canti, Can-
zonetti, and Stornelli have been very loosely
and indiscriminately employed. But, speaking
2 This most popular air Is a striking Illustration of the fortuitous
manner in which songs sometimes acquire a national renowu. The
circumstances which made ' Daghela avanti un passo ' famous wera
as follows. In 1858, when Milan was a hot-bed ot Italian conspiracy
and intrigue against the Austrian rule in Lombardy, the perform
ance of a ballet-dancer at the Teatro della Cannobiana was received
by the spectators with mingled expressions of approval and dis
approval, which gave rise to disorder In the theatre. The police
interfered, and took the part of the majority, whose opinion was ad
verse to the danseuse. This at once enlisted the popular sympathies
on her side, and her cause was thenceforth identified with patriotic
aspirations. Further disturbances followed, and the police stopped
the run of the ballet. Thereupon the tune to which the ballet-girl
danced her passo a soZo passed into the streets of Milan and was
heard everywhere, sung by the populace with words partly Italian
and partly Milanese. It was a hybrid song of love and war, with the
refrain ' daghela avanti un passo ' (meaning ' move a step forward '),
and it was received by the public as an exhortation to patriotic
action. To Austrian ears ths tune and the words were an insolent
challenge, and they were not forgotten when war was declared a
few months later between Austria and the kingdom of Piedmont.
• Daghela avanti un passo ' was then played in derision by the
military bands of Austria, while her troops were advancing from
Lombardy into Piedmont. But Austria was soon compelled to
evacuate Piedmont, and her retreating armies ever heard the same
song sung by the advancing soldiers of Italy. Province after province
was subsequently annexed to Piedmont and with each successive
annexation the area of the popularity of ' Daghela avanti un passo'
was extended, until it was heard all over the Italian kingdom. This
is its melody :—
etc.
590
SONG.
SOXG.
generally, Stornelli are lively love-songs ; Can
zoni and Canzonette narrative songs, while Canto
is a generic term applicable to almost any form.
[See STORNELLI.]
For about a century and a half — from the
latter part of the i7th century to the earlier
part of the present century — the Canzoni and
Canzonette da. Camera of Ilaly exhibited neither
merit nor improvement. A few collections were
published from time to time, but apparently
very slight attention was paid to them. They
were mostly of a religious tendency ; not hymns,
but Canzoni spirituals e morali, as they were
called. Even when the Canzoni Madrigalesche
were reduced to two voices (as, for instance, those
of Benedetto Marcello, published at Bologna
in 1717) they continued to be essentially poly
phonic, one voice imitating the other. How
poor and uninteresting was the true monodic
Canzone of those days may be learnt from the
following example by Gasparini, dating probably
about 1 730.
Anflante.
OAPPARTNI. 1730.
BE
Senz-a la mla dl - let-ta rl - po - so piu non
£±fc&U=t
E±£
m
ES
--£25
?^s
1
tro - vo ri po - so piii non
tro - vo
o -
^B
-• 1 — I — •— «— I
i^EEEEB
- vunque il pas-so io mo -vo mise------ gui - -
=r»±=*i
-• — •-
£
- ta il > do - - lor.
£S2l
•^E.
For many important forms of music, such as
the Opera, the Cantata, the Sonata, and the
Fugue, etc., we are primarily and especially in
debted to the Italians ; but as regards the mo
dern Artistic Song we owe them little. Just as
the 'couplets' and favourite tunes of the Opera
supplied the people with Canti popolari, so did
its Arie and Cavatine provide the pieces which
the educated classes preferred to hear at con
certs and in drawing-rooms. Until quite a
recent date there was no demand for songs pro
per ; few composers, therefore, deemed it worth
their while to bestow pains on this kind of
work. To write an opera is the natural ambi-
tion of Italian musicians, and short indeed is the
list of those who have devoted themselves to
other branches of music. In the works of Cima-
rosa, Mercadante, Bellini, Donizetti, and other
celebrated composers of operas, we find very
numerous Ariette, Canzonette, Rondi, Romanze,
and Notturni, but none evincing any serious
thought or pains. They are too weak to stand
the test of time : the popularity they may once
have known has been brief and fleeting. An
exception, however, must be made in favour of
Rossini, some of whose songs are really beautiful.
Among composers of songs in the latter part
of the last century, the names of Asioli, Barni,
Federici, and Blangini may be mentioned, and
Giordani, whose ' Caro mio ben ' has been a
general favourite. Of those who have lived
nearer our own time Gordigiani is undoubtedly
the best for simple popular songs. He wrote in
the true Italian style, with the utmost fluency,
spontaneity and simplicity. Next to him in
merit — though less well known — stands Mari-
ani. Injustice would be done to the living
composers of songs in Italy, if our estimate of
them were founded solely on the songs which
have a circulation in England. Men like Tosti,
Denza, and others, write, as it were, for the
English market; but their work is too trivial
to gain anything more than a very transient
popularity. Far better writers than these exist
in Italy, though they remain unknown beyond
the borders of their own country. "With few
exceptions, however, Italian songs are marked,
in a greater or less degree, by the same quali
ties. The voice part is ever paramount in them,
and all else is made to yield to it. The beauti
ful quality and wide compass of Italian voices,1
and the facility with which they execute diffi
cult vocal phrases, tempt the composer to write
brilliant and effective passages, where a simple
melody would be far more appropriate to the
words. The words may indeed give the form
to the song, and determine its number of sec
tions and periods, and the music may substan
tially agree with the text, but we miss that
delicate, subtle understanding between the poet
and the musician which we find in German
songs, where the music often acts as an inter
preter to the words, or the sound of a single
word gives importance to a note or passage.
Again, in Italian songs the accompaniment
holds a very subordinate place. Its sole use is
to support the voice ; it has rarely any artistic
value of its own, and more rarely still does it
assist in expressing the poetic intention of the
piece.
It would be wrong, however, to apply these
criticisms without reserve to all modern Italian
composers. Rossini, for instance, knew how to
rise above the common defects of his countrymen,
and many of the accompaniments to his songs
are most interesting. Take, for example, No. 2
It is curious to note how limited is the compass of voice for which
modern Italian composers write songs intended to circulate and 1
sung in foreign countries, while the songs that they write for the
home maikji of Italy olten exceeds two octaves.
SONG.
of 'LaRegata Veneziana,' where the rhythmical
figure in the left hand represents the regular
movement of oars, whilst the right hand has
continuous legato passages in double notes.
SONG.
591
' Co passa la Regata.'
Allegretto Agitato.
Rosstwi.
Very clever accompaniments are also met with
in the compositions of Marco Sala, Faccio, Boz-
zano, Coronaro, and Smareglia. The last two
have paid especial attention to the words of
their songs. But pre-eminent in every respect
above other living writers of songs in Italy is
a young Florentine, Benedetto lunck by name.
For beauty of melody, skilful accompaniment,
originality and grace, a very high place would
be assigned in any country to lunck' s publica
tion 'La Simona,' which contains twelve songs
for soprano and tenor. And such capacities as
his encourage the hope that the standard of Ita
lian songs may yet be raised by careful study
to that higher level of thought and conception
which has been reached in other lands.
For further information on the Troubadours
and the Italian Song see —
' Leben und Werke der Troubadours ' ; Friedricli Dietz.
' Ueber die Lais ' ; Ferdinand Wolff.
'The Troubadours'; F. Hueffer.
'Storia e Ragione '; II Quadrio.
1 Le Kiyoluzioni del teatro musicale Italiano '; Arteaga.
' Histoire de la Musique en Italie ' ; Orloff.
'Dizionaria eBibliografla della Musica'; Lichtenthal.
'Schicksale und Beschaffenheit des weltlichen Ge-
sauges'; Kiesewetter.
'Cenno storico sulla scuola musicale di Napoa ;
Flnrimo.
' Histoire de la Musique moderne ' ; Marcillac.
'Italienische Tondicbter ' ; Naumann.
'Gescliichte der Musik'; Ambros.
The writer also owes her warmest thanks to Mr. G.
Mazzucato for information given to her.
FRANCE.
What was done for music by the Troubadours
of Provence and the ' Trouveres ' of Northern
France, has been briefly described above. Their
development of the Song in France was carried
further by the eminent ' Chansonniers ' of the
13th century, Adam de la Hale and Guillaume
Machaud. The former, surnaiued ' le
d' Arras,' was born in 1240 ; the latter in
1285 ; and they may be regarded as connecting
links between the 'Trouveres' and the learned
musicians of later times. Like the 'Trouveres,'
they invented both the words and the melodies
of their songs, but they also attempted to write
in the polyphonic forms of vocal composition ;
and imperfect as these attempts were, they
marked a step in advance of the 'Trouveres.'
To Adam de la Hale and Machaud the Chanson
owes much. Not only can the germ of the
future Vaudeville be detected in Adam de la
Hale's pastorale 'Robin et Marion,' but its chan
sons also are strictly similar in structure and
character to those of the present day. In ancient
find modern chansons alike, we find a strongly
marked rhythm, easy intervals, repetition of one
melodic phrase, paucity of notes, and extreme
simplicity of general plan. Though nearly fnx
hundred years have passed since ' Kobin et
Marion' was written, the song 'Robin m'aime' is
still sung in Hennegau.1
•8-
. Jf 4 .
1 r»* i i
-I — 1= — - — 1
uU *f
"Tti^P — d—
d — p — I
Vy a)
gi • j •)•• -c?
ai 1
Eo
• bins m'aime Bo - bins i
n'a
Piw^
I i
II..
"n
j. i-r^- U^
£2 \^\
I" r 1
ft ' 2"
(— .e z r±j is ^ 9 ^
! i
• II
Ko-bSns n
i'a de - man - d<§ - e si m'a
- ra.
tvnl
j r^ ill J I
1 ^
J •
- • *-
•* -Jl«&' 0 S2
g! 0 "
Ko - bins
m'a ca - la - ce - te - le
des car -
I i I I
; — j
5"
i \ \ \ i- (^ \ m
-J J , •
: f ,
•1 el ** 1 « ^P 1 1
1 !
t& - le
bonne et belle sous - kra - n
i - e et
Dal Seqno al Fine.
chain - tu - re - le a leur ira.
In the year I7472 two volumes of French
and Latin poems, with descriptions of the music
to which some of them were set, were discovered
by Count de Caylus in a royal library of France,
both words and music being the work of Guil
laume de Machaud, ' poet and musician.' The
subjects of the poems are very varied, and among
them are a great number oflais, virelais, ballades,
and rondeaux, some for a single voice, and others
in four parts. And as in these full pieces the
words are placed under the tenor part only, it
may be inferred that this was the principal
melody. The majority are in Old French, and
the few Latin poems of the collection are chiefly
motets, and for a single voice. Machaud seems
to have been most renowned for his graceful and
rhythmical ballettes, or dance-songs, which as a
rule are written in triple or compound time. It
should be noted that in the songs of this early
period the melody is never protracted and draw a
i This example Is taken from MM. Mathis Lussy's and Ernest
David's 'Histoire de la Notation Musicale,' p. 105.
-' Burney. History of Music, vol. ii. p. 303. These volumes are still
piestJ'Vtd iu the iiiliiolhc>iue
592
SONG.
out to the detriment of the words, but closely
follows the quick succession of syllables without
visible effort. These old melodies often have the
Iambic rhythm ; for instance —
ADAM DE LA HALE.I
II n'est si - bon - ne vl - an - de que ma - tons.
which in modern times has ceded place to the
Trochaic ; as —
Words : ' Les grandes VeYit^s.' '
Air : ' La fanfare de S. Cloud.'
Oh, le bon sle-cle mes fre-res, Que lesie'cleounous vivons.
Contemporary with Machaud, or a little his junior,
was Jehannot Lescurel, who wrote romances still
extant in MS., one of which has been trans
lated into modern notation by M. Fe"tis. This
romance — ' A vous douce de"bonnaire ' — exhibits
a rather more developed melody and a more
modern tendency than other productions of the
eame date.3
Even if it be true, as some assert, that during
the 1 4th and I5th centuries the Church exer
cised an exclusive dominion over music, she was,
nevertheless, a friend to secular music. By
taking popular tunes for the themes of their
masses and motets — such as ' L'Omme arme",'
'Tant je me deduis,' 'Se la face ay pale,' used
by Dufay; or 'Baisez-moi' by Roselli; 'Malheur
me bat ' by Josquin de Pres, etc,4 the musicians of
the Church preserved many a tune which would
otherwise have perished. For want of such adop
tion by the Church we have lost the airs to which
the curious Noels, printed in black letter at the
end of the I5th century, were sung. The names
of the airs (' Faulce trahison,' etc.) remain as
superscriptions to the text, but every trace of
the airs themselves has vanished. In that great
age of serious polyphonic music a high place was
held by the French school, or, to speak more
correctly, the Gallo-Belgian school, for during
the I4th and I5th centuries no distinction, as
regards music, can be drawn between Northern
France and Belgium. The frontier between the
two countries was an often-shifted line ; in re
spect of race and religion they had much in
common ; and many a composer of Belgian birth
doubtless had his musical education in France.
By the Italians the French and Belgian composers
were indiscriminately called Galli ; and indeed
no attempt has ever been made to distinguish a
Belgian from a French school of music anterior
to the end of the i6th century.
The direct use made of secular music for
ecclesiastical purposes is remarkably illustrated
by the works of Cle'ment Marot. He was a
translator of a portion of the Psalms ; and the
first thirty of them, which he dedicated to his
king, Francois I, were set or 'parodied' to the
1 See Ambros, Geschichte der Musik, vol. ii. p. 295.
2 See Du Mersan, ' Chants et Chansons populaires.*
3 This song is to be found in the ' Eevue Musicale,' vol. xll. no. 34.
< See Ambros, ' Gesch. d. Musik,' vol. iii. pp. 15, 16, etc.
SONG.
favourite dance airs of the Court.5 Popularity
was thus at once secured for the Psalmg which
members of the Court could sing to their favourite
courantes, sarabandes, and bourses. After Ma-
rot's death Beza continued his work, at Calvin's
instance. Much doubt long existed as to whom
belonged the honour of having set the Psalms to
music. Some ascribed it wholly to Marot, others
to Goudimel : but M. Douen has now made it
clear that these men, together with Jambe de
Fer, Franc, Claudin, and perhaps others, adapted
the Psalms to existing profane songs.6 In the
' Psautier Flamand Primitif ' (15 40) all the Psalms
are for one voice, and, with only two exceptions,
they can all be traced back to their sources in
popular French and Flemish songs. For cantiques,
moreover, as well as masses, secular airs have
been openly utilised by composers of the Koman
Catholic Church.7
While secular music was thus made to minister
to the Church, it had a separate, though less con
spicuous, sphere of its own. This is attested by
the vaux-de-vire, voix-de-ville (better known by
their modern name of vaudevilles9), and airs-de-
cour, collected and published in the i6th century,
but evidently belonging to the preceding century.
Much grace, indeed, and gaiety were evinced in
the French songs and romances of this period,
and it would be wrong to disparage such com
posers as Noe Feignient, Guillaume le Heurteur,
Pierre Vermont,9 and Fra^ois I., whose song ' 0
triste de*partir' is full of feeling. More important
work, undoubtedly, was however being done by
their polyphonic contemporaries. A celebrated
collection, with a dedication to Charles IX. by
Ronsard, was published in 1572, under the title
of ' Meslanges de Chansons,' containing songs
for 4, 6, and sometimes 8 voices, by all the
best-known Gallo-Belgian masters, such as Jos-
quin, Mouton, Claudin, etc. These songs, like
others of the same date, are full of canonic de
vices. Clement Jannequin, Crespel, and Raif
wrote many songs in four or more parts. Pierre
Ronsard's sonnets were set to music by Philippe
de Monte in 5, 6, and 7 parts ; and his songs
in 4 parts by Bertrand and Reynard. Mention
3 ' Wekerlin says, In his ' Echos du Temps passeY yol. ill. p. 138.
that when any dance air- became popular, rhymers immediate!
« parodied ' it ; i. e. put words to it, so that it could be sung. The
term ' parody ' thus used had no sense of burlesque, but simply meant
adaptation. The celebrated publishers and editors, 'La famille
Ballard,1 issued a quantity ol these songs : ' L'Abeille,' a well-known
example, is really a minuet.
6 See Douen, ' Cle'ment Marot etle Psautier Hugenot,' vol. I. p. 60
7 According to Douen (vol. 1. pp. 688 and 703) the .Roman Catbi
have never ceased to adapt secular airs to ecclesiastical uses from th
16th century down to the present time ; and he supports the si
ment by reference to ' La pieuse Alouette avec son tire-lire : Ohansot
Spirituelles, le plupart sur les air mondains, par. Ant. de la Cauchii
1619 ' ; ' Imitation de Je"sus-Christ en Cantiques sur des airs d'Operas
et de Vaudevilles, par Abb<5 Pelegrin. 1727 (Paris)1; and 'Concert
Spirituelles,' a collection published at Avignon in 1835, of masses,
requiems, hymns, prayers, proses, etc.. on operatic melodies by W
Piccinni, Mozart, Cimarosa, Kossini, Me"hul, and others.
8 In attributing the invention of the vaudeville to Basseilr
musician of the second half of the 15th century, Bousseau and o
have confused it with the vaux-de-vire. Basselin and Jean le
who lived in the little valley (vaux) around Vire, in Normandy, w
many favourite drinking-songs, and hence drinking-songs came w
be called vaux-de-vire. But vaudeville is a corruption of voix-de-vMt,
an old term originally applied to chansons sung in the streets, ai
afterwards extended to all songs with gay airs and light word;
9 Pierre Vermont is mentioned by Rabelais in the prologue to in
second book of 'Pantagruel.'
SONG.
should also be made of Gombert, Josquin's cele
brated pupil. And Certon has shown in his
<Je ne fus jamais si ayse' what excellence the
French polyphonic chanson can attain in capable
hands.
The effects of the great change which came
over vocal music at the end of the i6th century
were, perhaps, more marked in France and Bel
gium than elsewhere. Polyphonic music, whether
in masses or in madrigals, had been, as we have
seen, the forte of the Gallo-Belgian school ; but
when once the monodic system had gained uni
versal recognition, polyphonic music began to
decline even where it had flourished most, and
the Gallo-Belgian school surrendered its indivi
duality by absorption into the Italian school.
Thenceforward original melodies of their own
invention were expected of musicians, and the
old practice of choosing themes for compositions
in popular songs or current dance-tunes died
out, though its disappearance was gradual, for
no ancient or inveterate usage ever ceases all
at once.1 The French composers were likewise
influenced by two other great innovations of this
time, viz. the creation of discords by Monteverde,
and the application of music to the drama. In
the latter years of the 1 6th century songs for one
voice began to find favour and to drive airs for 3,
4, 5, or 6 voices from the ground which they had
occupied for more than 1 50 years. And that most
characteristic type of French songs, the romance,
was soon to commence, or rather to resume, a
reign of popularity which is not yet ended.
Scudo defines the romance to be a song divided
into several ' couplets.' The air of a romance is
always simple, naive, and tender, and the theme
of its words is generally amatory. Unlike the
chanson, it is never political or satirical. It
was one of the very earliest fruits of French
grace, sensibility, and gallantry ; and, though its
attributes may have varied from time to time, it
has remained unchanged in its essence from the
era of the Troubadours until now. There was, it
is true, a period after the disappearance of the
Troubadours, when the romance was threatened
with extinction by its formidable rival, the poly
phonic chanson, but the iyth century saw it
again in possession of all its old supremacy.
Louis XIII., who was more at home in music
than in politics, wrote several romances ; and his
music-master, Pierre Guddron, was perhaps the
foremost composer of romances of that time.
Several charming examples of his works are
extant, but the following, which was first pub
lished in a correct form a few years ago, is cer
tainly one of the best.2 The modulations are
truly remarkable for that date.
1 When public opinion first ceased to approve this practice, com
posers did not at once abandon it, but they no longer produced pieces
which were avowedly parodies or adaptations : it now became their
habit to attach their names to all their melodies, whether they were
original or borrowed. As Scudo, for instance, observes in his 'Cri
tique et Litt^rature musicales,' the words of ' Charmante Gabrielle '
were no more written by Henri IV. than its music was written by his
naitre de chapelle, Du Caurroy. The air is really an old Noel of
unknown authorship ; and probably some court poet, Desportes per
haps, wrote the words by order of the king. [See GABBIELLE,
CHARMANTE, vol. i. p. 572.]
2 See Wekerlin, ' Echos du Temps passe",' vol. iii. p. 10.
VOL. III. FT. 5.
1 f
i»~Zj
SONG.
i »—
593
[—±^ — 1 — 1
J
Aux plai - si
F^PF^
• F * -•
rs, aux dd - li - ce
n::zi~
s, ber - ge -
J 1
res, Aux pi
- r *
ai - sirs, aux d
£:
5 - 11 - ces, ber - g<
^ - - res,
— i 1 — i
• -r JlJT
__J — J — J_
^ * • s~) .
=ur^M
11 faul
1 1
, 6 - tre du t
emps m6 - na - ge -
— *$m —
- res, U faut
mf
— $-.-m :
-hH-— K-
-]—p— H
n* • J *
3 •
BP
|H •
^^ 'TJ II
9 \ "1
6 - tre du
temps me-na
- ge - - res ;
Car il s'd-
F r i*
H« h
Ha P F
P m m 1
•
" # rU
• * um
r F 1
l ' l
1 ^P
r r i | |
i 1
1 1 1
coule et se i
>erd d'heure en
BaZL ,-,
heure. Et le re-
gret seu-le-ment
(1 H« • h«
a i
F c^
1 "(- * U*
°
1 • • 1
i r i* r
nJ
— 1 . Lj-
^^ j
II 1
| I
^•i
en de
- meur - e!
A 1'a-mour, au
plai-sir, au bo -
I
"~1- ~ \ |i
• J
2 J
m
i •
. * m
:* • • « /^
cage em- ploy -ez les beaux jours de votre fi, - - ge.
Gue'dron's3 son-in-law, Boesset, was the author,
of a very famous romance, * Cachez beaux yeux.',
And the names of Beaulieu, Deschamps, Colasse,
Bernier, Lefevre, Lambert, and Pierre Ballard
may be recorded as other composers of this age.
The last (whose ' Belle, qui m'avez blesseY was a
popular romance) was a member of the famous
Ballard family of music -printers : others of the
family also were composers. As printers, they
preserved a large quantity of brunettes * (' ou
petits airs tendres'), drinking-songs, and dance-
songs. Here we may mention the drone bass,
which occurs so frequently in French musettes
and other dance-songs.
Ah! man beau laboureur ! Chanson k danser.5
-f-T T?
Fa
r r r f-
— f-* 1
are Str.) Ah !
(Me Str.) N'a -
mon beau la - bou
vous pas vu pas
- reur; Ah!
- ser, N'a -
-J^ rfj
— ^
P
1
S (7 £*— — f f—
I ^ • — *-!
L& — c— H
I I
I
8 Pierre Gue'dron, born about 1565, was a singer in the King's band
at Paris, and in 1601 succeeded Claude Lejeune as composer to the
same. He was a great composer of Ballets, and was one of tho
chief persons to bring about the great monodic revolution, by which
solo songs ousted the polyphonic compositions that had for so long
ruled. A large number were published by the Ballards between 1605
and 1650. Gue'dron's son-in-law, Antoine Boesset, was not only the
favourite song-composer, but also the best lutenist of his time.
[See BOESSET, vol. i. p. 255.]
4 BRUNETTE is defined by Diderot and d'Alembert, in their en
cyclopaedia, to be a kind of chanson, with an easy and simple air, and
written in a style which is gallant, but without affectation, and often
tender and playful. The term is generally believed to have come
from the young girls, 'petites brunes' or 'brunettes,' to whom these
songs were so frequently addressed. Ballard however maintains that
the term was derived from the great popularity of a particular song
in which the word was used. A well-known specimen is ' Dans notre
village,' called in some collections 'Nous 6tions troisfilles a marier,'
and attributed to LefSvre.
6 See Wekerlin, ' Echos du Temps passeV vol. il. p. 116.
Qq
594
SONG.
SONG.
1
i~
~F — 1^~^
— • m—yl
—
i —
| i i "
mon beau la - bou - reur !
vous pas vu pas - ser
Beau
Mar -
la - bou-reur de
gue - ri - te, ma
"^
£
_•
• —~S^\ ,
r^ - t
;-!•- -
1— 1=> r-
i i
1
Lu_J
i— C— h-
1 1
' |5? —ll
1 1
-H
_p
— i — d — i
• . t . jjj : • :
1 1 1 1
vigne, 0 lire, 0
mie, 0 lire, ft
li - re. Beau
li - re, Mar
la - bou-reur de
gue - ri - te ma
^,
<^>
-$•&
-es-
r1^ )• i*
r^, 4 •
2^ B B
i r
f™
P5 P P
to p p
F—2 B •
i r
i ri
i r r
E* a
h h •»
,"
22 -U
i
• H
vlgne, 0 li - re
mie? 0 li - re
la.
la!
— s^55 —
JF' ^ — -p
f^> * _ p
— P? — r r — ; n —
C2 P P
JT3 .J]"
i i r
1
Several brunettes were included in the great col
lection of old French popular songs, which A.
Philidor copied out with his own hand and dedi
cated to Louis XIV.1 Many were undoubtedly
written on old Noel airs, especially those in parts.
After the I yth century they become scarcely dis
tinguishable from romances.
For excellent and typical specimens of the
romances of the iSth century, we may quote
J. J. Rousseau's 'Le Rosier' and 'Au fond
d'une sombre vallee,' both which are found
in his collection entitled 'Les Consolations des
Miseres de ma Vie.' Simple, graceful, and pa
thetic as the former of these is, it is inferior to
the latter in the descriptive power of the music.
Its melody is as follows : —
Au fondd'un-e som-bre val - le"-e, dans l'en-cein-te
Une hum-ble caaumiere i - so - 16e each-oil Vin - no
d'un bois & - - pais, cen.ce et la paix. La vi - volt
fi'est en Angle - ter - re, un - e me-re dont le d6 - sir
Still extant in the Conservatoire in Paris. [See PHILIDOR.]
- toit de lais - ser sur la ter - re sa fil - le heur-euse, et
puis mou - - lir.
while the soft murmur of the accompaniment is
sustained in semiquavers. The musicians of
this period would seem to have been inspired by
the grace and delicacy of the contemporary poetry
to create melodies of great tenderness and sim
plicity. Insipid as these melodies must often
appear to us, whose taste has been educated
by great masters of the classical and romantic
schools, they are thoroughly representative of the
age which produced them. It was the time of
that singular phase of thought and feeling which
will for ever be associated with the name of
J. J. Rousseau ; a time of yearnings to return
to some imagined state of native innocence; to
an ideal pastoral life in some visionary Arcadia.
All this was faithfully reflected in the works of
its poets and musicians. What an idyll, for in
stance, is presented to us by ' Que ne suis-je la
fougere,' the words of which were written by
Riboutte", an amateur poet, to an old air wrongly
attributed to Pergolesi. Among other favourite
romances were 'O ma tendre musette' — words
by La Harpe, and music by Monsigny ; ' II pleut,
bergere/ by Simon; 'Les petits oiseaux,' by
Rigel ; ' L' Amour fait passer le temps, le temps
fait passer 1'amour,' by Solie"; 'Annette et Lupin,'
by Favart; and 'Que j'aime a voir les hiron-
delles,' by Devienne.
Although romances were so much in vogue
and reached so high a degree of excellence, they
were not the only noteworthy songs of the times
in question. Songs of other kinds were written
by such eminent composers of the iSth century
as Gre"try, Dalayrac, and Me"hul. Amongst these,
political songs are prominent. In no country
have they been more important than in France.
The temperament of the French has ever been
favourable to the production of political chansons.
The ' Mazarinade' of the 1 7th century was a vast
collection of more than four thousand satirical
effusions against Mazarin, adapted to popular
airs. Early in the iSth century was heard the
famous song 'Malbrook s'en va-t-en guerre,'2
and later on, in the first throes of the Revolution,
the Royalists of France were singing 'Pauvre
Jacques/ by the Marquise de Travenet; and the
air resounded with 'Ca-ira/ from the throats of
the insurgent rabble of Paris. ' Richard d^mon
roi,' and ' Oil peut on etre mieux qu'au sein de
sa famille ' have become historical by their use
at the same terrible period. [See vol. iii. p. 1 27 a ;
vol. ii. p, 616 &.] As might have been expected
of so profound a movement, the Revolution gave
birth to many remarkable songs. To the stormy
years of the close of the iSth and the opening of
the i pth centuries are due the finest chants or
patriotic songs of France. Supreme among these
2 For further mention of these political songs see Diet.
SONG.
stands the 'Marseillaise,' which has won im
mortality for its author and composer, Rouget
de Lisle. Next in merit come three songs of
MeTml's, viz. the ' Chant du Depart,' words by
Chdnier ; the ' Chant du Retour ' ; and the ' Chant
de Victoire.' And by the side of these may be
placed the 'Reveil du Peuple,' by Souriquere de
S. Marc, music by Gaveaux;1 and Desorgues'
'Pere de 1'Univers,' set by Gossec. Contemporary
with the foregoing songs, but on a lower level of
political importance, were 'Cadet Rousselle' ; the
' Chanson du Hoi Dagobert ' ; ' Fanf an la Tulipe ' ; 2
the 'Chanson de Roland'; 'Te souviens-tu ?';
1 Le r^cit du Caporal ' ; and many others which
it would be tedious to enumerate.
It may here be observed, parenthetically, that
from the first introduction of chansons balladees
— that is, dance-songs — down to the present day,
6-8 time has predominated over every other
measure in French songs. They still retain the
peculiarity of giving each syllable (including the
final e) a separate note ; and so long as the tune
be rhythmical and piquant, and the words witty
and amusing, the French taste exacts but little
in respect of harmony or accompaniment, or in
deed of general musical structure. The success
of these songs depends greatly on the way they
are sung. These remarks, however, refer only to
the lighter classes of chansons ; and are not so
applicable to patriotic or lyric songs.
After the accession of Napoleon and the ac
companying revival of monarchical traditions, the
demand for romances was more eager than ever,
and there was no lack of composers ready to
supply it. The most successful was Plantade,
whose melodies were tuneful and tender, while
his accompaniments exhibit a certain dramatic
power. His best romances are ' Ma peine a de-
vance 1'aurore '; ' Languir d'amour, ge"mir de ton
silence'; and 'Te bien aimer, 6 ma chere Zelie':
of these the last is the best. Garat, Pradher,
and Lambert were Plantade's chief rivals. An
other popular contemporary was Dalvimare, who
combined wit and knowledge of the world with
much musical erudition: his 'Chant he"roique du
Cid ' is really a fine song. For information re
specting Choron, the author of 'La Sentinelle,'
and the founder of a school whence issued
Duprez, Scudo, Monpou, and others who were
both singers and composers — the reader must
turn to another page of this Dictionary. [See
CHORON.] Conspicuous among the numerous
Italian composers who cultivated French romances
with success was Blangini ; from him the French
romance caught, as M. Scudo has pointed out,
some of the morbidezza of the Italian eanzonetta.
As a musician, however, Blangini was better
known to the Parisians than to his own country
men. And in any list of the distinguished writers
of romances at this period, the names of two
women, Mme. Gail and Queen Hortense, should
certainly be included. The former was the better
1 This song has been called the 'Marseillaise' of the Thermidor re
action. (' La Lyre Frai^aise,' by G. Masson.)
2 An old song of irregular metre, set to an old tune, and extremely
popular from 1792 to about 1802.
SONG.
595
musician, and proofs of study are given by her
romance ' Vous qui priez, priez pour moi.' About
Queen Hortense there was more of the amateur
composer. Having read some poem that took
her fancy, she would sit down to the pianoforte
and find an air that went to it ; she would then
play it to her friends, and if approved by them
would confide it to Drouet, or Carbonnel, or
Plantade, to put the air into musical shape, and
provide it with an accompaniment. Her most
successful songs were 'Partant pour la Syrie';
'Vous me quittez pour aller a la gloire,' and
'Reposez-vous, bon chevalier.' Of these the first
is the most famous, and the last has most musical
merit.3
As a general reflection on the songs which
have just passed under our review, it may be
said that their most common fault is the en
deavour to express inflated sentiments with in
adequate means. A discrepancy is constantly
felt between the commonplace simplicity of the
accompaniments and modulations and the intense
sentimentality or turgid pomposity of the words.
The disparity can only be concealed by an amount
of dramatic and expressive singing which very
few singers possess. This prevalent defect cannot,
however, be imputed to Romagnesi, who began
as a choir-boy under Choron ; his 300 romances
and chansonettes are free from it. The melodies
are clearly denned and well adapted for the voice,
and the accompaniments strike a mean between
pretension and bald simplicity. 'L'attente,' 'La
dormeuse,' 'L'Angelus,' and ' Le rSve' may be
cited as good illustrations of his merits. The
same praise may be accorded to A. de Beauplan,
who in freshness and piquancy was even superior
to Romagnesi. And of others who wrote about
the same time and in the same style, it will
suffice to mention the names of Panseron, Bru-
guiere, Jadin, Mengal, Dolive, Goule", Berton,
Pullet, Lis, Scudo, Mme. Malibran, the famous
singer, and Mme. Duchambge. But perhaps
the reputation of Mme. Duchambge was in no
small degree due to the skill with which Nourrit
sang her songs, such as ' L'ange gardien ' and
'Penses-tu que ce soit aimer.'
Out of the revolutionary era of 1830 there
came in France a splendid burst of lyric poetry.
It was the era of Victor Hugo, Lamartine, Casi-
mir Delavigne, Alfred de Musset and Beranger ;
and it was natural that the Song should be
responsive to the poetic movement of the time.
In 1828 Monpou published BeVanger's 'Si j'etais
petit oiseau ' for three voices, and at once at
tracted the notice of the poets of the Romantic
3 Scudo, in his ' Litte'rature et Critique musicales,' tells the follow
ing story of ' Reposez-vous, bon chevalier,' on the authority of Mile.
Cochelet, who was tor a long time attached to Queen Hortense, ' Not
withstanding a slight cough, and the doctor's prohibition, the Queen
continued to sing more than was good for her. In the morning she
used to compose her romances, being then alone, and in the evening
she played them in her salon, allowing her audience to criticise.
M. Alexandre de Laborde was the author whose words she generally
selected.to set to music. His was "Partant pour la Syrie." Such was
the ease with which the Queen composed the melodies of her romances
that she attached little value to them. And she was on the point of
tearing up " Keposez-vous, bon chevalier," because in the evening
when she gave it, several persons confessed that they did not like it.
Luckily, Carbonnel was consulted, and he pronounced the air to be
the very best that the Queen had as yet composed.'
Qq2
596
SONG.
SONG.
school. His great popularity as a composer
commenced in 1830, with his setting of Alfred
de Musset's ' L'Andalouse/ Many more of de
Musset's ballads and romances were afterwards
set by him ; and he rendered the same service
to poems by Victor Hugo. But Monpou was not
a highly trained musician, and his music is very
faulty. He was a slave to the influences of the
Romantic school, and well illustrates the extreme
exaggeration to which it was prone. Neverthe
less, his songs are full of interest ; the melodies
are original and striking, and if the harmony be
incorrect, and at times harsh, it is never without
dramatic power. They are difficult to sing, but
notwithstanding this drawback, ' Le lever,' ' Le
voile blanc,' 'Les deux archers,' and 'La chanson
de Mignon' have an established popularity. The
last song reveals the best and most refined quali
ties of Monpou's imagination. Similar qualities
were, likewise, displayed by an incomparably
greater musician, Hector Berlioz, in whom there
was a depth of poetic insight and a subtle sense
of beauty, to which Monpou could make no pre
tension. Of all Berlioz's works, his songs are,
perhaps, the least tinged with the characteristic
exaggeration of the Romanticists ; but to describe
or classify them is by no means easy. He wrote
about twenty-seven in all : some are for more
than one voice, and some had originally an or
chestral accompaniment, though they are now
also published for the PF. ; op. 2, 'Irlande,'
consists of nine melodies for one or two voices,
and sometimes chorus : the words are imitations
of Thomas Moore's by Gounet ; and nos. i and
7, ' Le coucher du soleil,' and ' L'origine de la
harpe,' are perhaps the best. In op. 7, 'Nuits
d'e"teV there are six songs for one voice, with
orchestral or PF. accompaniment, and these are
perhaps the choicest of all ; nos. 3 and 4, 'Sur
les lagunes,' and ' L'absence/ are especially beau
tiful. Op. 12, 'La captive,' embodying a re
markable crisis of the writer's life, is a long
piece, written for a contralto voice, and its chief
interest attaches to the varied accompaniment,
which has been reduced to PF. score by Stephen
Heller. Op. 13, 'Fleurs des Landes/ consists
of five romances or chansons, some for one voice,
and some for two, or chorus, all bearing a dis
tinctively local colouring. In op. 1 9, ' Feuillets
d'Album/ the first piece is a bolero, the second
an aubarte, and the third a chorus for men's
voices with a tenor solo. Three songs without
an opus number — ' La belle Isabeau,' ' Le chas
seur danois,' and ' Une priere du matin ' (which
is really a duet)— complete the list of Berlioz's
songs. No one can study them without being
struck by the fragmentary character of the me
lodies, and the want of symmetry in the rhythmic
phrases. But these defects are atoned for by the
exquisite beauty of the melodic fragments ; and
the rhythmic phrases are never abruptly broken
or disjointed without justification. An explana
tion for it will always be found in the words,
which it was Berlioz's constant study to illustrate
with perfect fidelity. What can be more poetical
than the opening phrase in his song ' L'absence '!
And this, when repeated for the last time very
softly, and as if in the far distance, produces a
magic effect, especially when accompanied by the
orchestra.
Berlioz's accompaniments are highly developed,
and participate fully in the poetic intention of
the words. A proof of his skill in this respect
is afforded by the subjoined extract from 'Le
spectre de la rose,' where, after a full, rich,
and varied accompaniment throughout, he gives
to the last words merely single notes, and thus
unmistakeably marks the transition from the pas
sionate tale of the rose to its epitaph.
Un poco rit.
Fed.
Un poco piu lento e
sotto voce
vit: Ci - - git une
^ Una corda
10 - se Que tousles
ppp -+• -*- -^ -r
32
^ — P i~r i
m
SONG.
rois
vont ja-lou-ser,
/7N
Many another example of Berlioz's poetic faculty
might be adduced, but enough has already been
said to indicate his exalted position among
the song-composers of France. Although his
eminence is now (perhaps a little too fully)
recognised, far less of popular appreciation was
granted to him in his lifetime than to several of
his contemporaries, whose fleeting celebrity has
since been eclipsed by his enduring fame. Among
these lesser lights were Lo'isa Puget (a favourite
in pensions and convents), Th. Labarre, Grisar,
Be'rat, de Latour, Thys, Lagoanere, Dupotz,
Gatayes, Monfort, Cheret, Vimeux, Morel, etc.
This group would be m:>re correctly described
as romance writers, since their songs are for the
ino.-t part of a light character. More ambitious
work has been done by Niedermeyer, Ke'ber, and
Gouve", with whom may be classed the more
modern writers, Saint-Saens, Masse", Godard,
Massenet, and Paladilhe.
Notwithstanding the manifest preference of
the French for dramatic music, they have not
neglected other forms. To operatic composers —
for instance, such as Ambroise Thomas, Gounod,
Delibes, Bizet, and David — France owes some of
her choicest lyrics. And from German songs she
has not withheld the tribute of genuine admira
tion. It is no mean glory to have been the first
country outside Germany to give Schubert's
songs an adequate interpretation. [See vol. iii.
P- 357-] The art of singing is as well understood
and taught in France as in any other country,
and nowhere is a clear and correct pronunciation
of the words more strictly exacted of singers.
Indeed, from the fact that the syllables which
are mute in speaking are pronounced in singing,
the French language would be barely intelligible
when sung, unless distinctly articulated.
In Paris and the other large cities of France
the popular songs of the hour are only favourite
tunes from Comic Operas, or which have been
heard at a Cafe"-Chantant. But in the provinces
hundreds of national airs still exist, and their
distinct attributes are generally determined by
the locality to which they belong. The airs of
Southern France are distinguishable by exuberant
gaiety, deep poetic sentiment, and a religious
accent. Many of them are said to resemble the
graceful old Troubadour melodies. The following
modern Prove^al air, quoted by Ambros,1 bears
a strong resemblance to an old dance-song anterior
in date even to the ijth century : —
i See 'Geschichte der Musik,1 vol. ii. p. 242.
SONG.
597
^1 — ft — * —
r •[• . P— $^
™ 0\
Es-c
*_uj-i — t» *-*- = -j
la-ga-li. ma -tan a - ma - do me - te la
uut un pou a quest au - ba - do de tarn - bou -
1 Kl " -II " IL. h "
• p • ^ -
#. i
J i 'll k. N •
* I 1* -
•~i , • _K— •
— Z T--
I • •!) J •_
» -
t6st au fe
riu et de
- ne - strua Ei pleu d'es - tel - lo a - pera -
vio-loun.
^ KT~! *"*~ Hfe £~~Z J
— • — « •-
-E-^tF1^-^-^
^— t |_ -g~
moun L'auro es toum - ba - do ma - i - lis
— ^^ fc — — SI — Q
— 3 — ' f* — • — * —
es -tel-lo pali-
SE y--r-H:
ran queu te
vei - ran.
The songs of Auvergne are chiefly bourrees ; and
Burgundy is rich in Noels and drinking-songs.
The B^arnois airs are pathetic and melodious,
and their words are mostly of love ; while, on
the other hand, the subjects of the songs of
Normandy are generally supplied by the ordinary
pursuits and occupations of life. Mill-songs are
especially common in Normandy, and have a
character of their own. Their ' couplets ' are
wont to consist of two lines with a refrain ; and
the refrain is the principal part of the song. It
covers a multitude of failings in the rhyme, or
even sense, and allows the singer ample scope
to execute fantastic and complicated variations.
These mill-songs, which often breathe a strong
religious feeling, are curious and unique in their
way ; and when sung by the Norman peasants
themselves on summer evenings they produce an
effect, which is wholly wanting when sung in a
drawing-room with a modern pianoforte accom
paniment. In this respect they do not differ from
all other national airs of Northern France. The
songs of Brittany, for instance, equally defy de
scription and translation, into modern French.2
Rousseau says of them:— 'Les airs ne sont pas
piquants, mais ils ont je ne sais quoi d'antique
et de doux qui touche a la longue. Ils sont
simples, na'ifs, sou vent tristes,— ils plaisent pour-
tant.' And another author has likened their
grave beauty to the scenery of their native dis
tricts, to the chequered landscapes of cloud
and sunshine, of wild moorland and gray sea,
which are familiar to the traveller on the coast
of Brittany.
The works on which the foregoing account of
the Song in France has been based are —
'Chants et Chansons populaires de la Prance 'j Du
Mersan. (3 vola.)
' Des Chansons populaires ; Nisard.
' Essai sur la Musique ' ; Delaborde. (4 vols.)
'La Cle du Caveau> ; P, Capelle.
4 Ectios du Temps pass6 ' ; J. Wekerlin. (3 vols.)
Huguenot O. Uouen.
/o vols )
'Hiatoire de la Notation Musicale1; Ernest David et
Mathis Lussy.
'History of Music' (3 vols.) ; Burney.
' Les Chants de la Patrie' ; Lacombe.
' Geschichte der Musik ' ; Ambros. (4 vols.)
2 With good reason therefore Villemarquf5, In his admirable col
lection, gives the songs in their own dialect besides the translation
(See 'Barzas Breiz, chants populaires de la Eretagne, par H. de la
Villemarque.')
593
SONG.
The articles on CHANSON in this Dictionary, and
FRANKREICH in Mendel's Musikalisches Lexicon.
The present writer is also indebted to M. Mathis
Lussy and M. Gustave Chouquet for valuable advice
and assistance.
Further information may be found in :—
' Barzas-Breiz, chants populaires de la Bretagne, par
Hersart de la VillemarqueV
' Chansons et Airs populaires du Be"am, recueillis par
Fre'd^ric Rivarez.'
' Chants populaires des Flarnands de France, recueillis
par M. de Coussemaker.'
c Noels Nquviaux, sur des vieux airs, par Ch. Eibault
de Langardiere.'
' Noels Bressans, par Philibert le Due.'
4 Album Auvergnat, par J. B. Bouillet.'
SPAIN.
In Spain and Portugal the Song can scarcely
be said to have had a history. While both
countries can boast of having produced celebrated
composers of polyphonic and ecclesiastical music,
in neither has there been any systematic develop
ment of the secular and monodic departments.
The latter remains what it was in the earliest
times ; and all the best songa of Spain and
Portugal are the compositions of untaught and
unlettered musicians.
With regard to the national songs of Spain there
is an initial difficulty in determining whether
they are more properly Songs or Dances, because
at the present day all the favourite songs of
Spain are sung as accompaniments to dancing ;
but it is of course, as songs, and not as dances,
that they concern us here.
Spanish literature is rich in remains of antique
poetry, and of poetry which from the time of the
'Trobadores' was intended to be sung. Among
such literary relics are the celebrated cancioneros
of the 1 5th century, large miscellaneous collec
tions of songs, containing a vast number of
canciones, invenciones, motes, preguntas, mllan-
cicos and ballads.1 The ballads are in eight-
syllabled asonante verses (i.e. with the vowels
only rhyming), and they are stated to have
been sung to 'national recitatives,' or as ac
companiments to dances; but not a vestige of
their music has been preserved. The villancicos,
or peasants' songs, with their refrains and ritor-
nelles, were also evidently sung, as the six- voiced
villancicos of the i6th century by Puebla would
show ; but in proportion to the quantity of ex
tant words to these songs very little of their
music has come down to us.2 Again, in collec
tions of the romanceros of the i6th century, the
old ballads are said to have come from blind
ballad-singers, who sang them in the streets;
but not a note of music was written down,
1 The fashion of making such collections of poetry, generally called
cancioneros, was very common in Spain just before and after the
introduction of printing. Many of these collections, both in manu
script and printed, are preserved. The Bibliotheque Nationale,
Paris, contains no less than seven. See ' Catalogo de MSS. Espauoles
en la Biblioteca Real de Paris,' Paris 1844, 410. pp. 8TO-525. For
further information see Ticknor's 'History of Spanish Literature*
chap, xxiii. p. 391.
2 There may, however, still be in existence more of ancient
Spanish music, both polyphonic and monodic, both ecclesiastical
and secular, than we are aware of. Owing to the jealousy with
which foreigners are excluded from Spanish libraries, valuable
specimens of ancient music may vet survive, unknown to us. In an
account of Spanish music, published in the 19th vol. (No. I) of the
4 Academic Hoyale de Belgique,' Gevaert complains of the difficulties
thrown in his way.
SONG.
though hundreds of the ballads survive. And
these old ballads are still sung by the people in
Spain to traditional airs which have passed from
mouth to mouth through many a generation.
Moreover such melodies as are really genuine in
modern collections of Spanish songs have almost
without exception been taken down from the
lips of blind beggars, who are now, as they were
in the mediaeval times, the street-singers of
Spanish towns.3
The national songs of Spain may be divided
into three geographical groups, those of (i) Bis
cay and Navarre; (2) Galicia and Old Castile;
(3) Southern Spain (Andalusia). In the first of
these groups are the songs of the Basques, who
are believed to have been the earliest inhabitants
of the Peninsula.
(i) The exclusiveness with which the Basques
have kept themselves a distinct and separate
race has made it difficult, if not impossible, to
trace their music to any primeval source. There
has been a good deal of speculation on this point ;
but it is not necessary to give the numerous
conjectures put forward as to its origin. The
time and rhythm of the Basque songs are most
complicated ; the zorzico, for instance, is in 5-8
or 7-4 time, thus —
O id o Gui-puz - coa DOS ensen ei-lla-caa
cion
etc.
or in alternating bars of 6-8 and 3-4 time.
The melodies are apparently not founded ou
any definite scale ; quarter tones regularly occur
in the minor melodies ; and the first note of a
song is always surrounded by a grupetto,* which
gives it an indefinite and undecided effect. The
last note, on the other hand, has always a firm,
loud, and long-sustained sound. In Arragon
and Navarre the popular dance is the jota, and
according to the invariable usage of Spain, it is
also the popular song. The jota is almost always
sung in thirds, and has the peculiarity that in
the ascending scale the minor seventh is sung in
the place of the major. [See JOTA.]
(2) The songs of the second group are less in
teresting. The rule of the Moors over Galicia and
Old Castile was too brief to impart an Eastern
colouring to the music of those provinces. It is,
however, gay and bright, and of a strongly ac
cented dance rhythm. The words of the songs
are lively, like the music, and in perfect accord
with it. To this geographical group belong the
boleros, manchegas, and seguidillas ; but this last
3 See ' Echos de 1'Espagne,' p. 83, where MM. Lacome and J. Pui?y
Alsubide give a Malaguena faithfully transcribed from the lips of
blind beggars. The blindness of these singers gives a certain value
to the derivation of the name Chaconne, from cieco 'blind.'
* ' TJne sorte de grupetto intraduisible, qui est & la phrase music
ce qu'est une paraphe precurseur d'une majuscule dans certaines
exercises calligraphiques.' (Madame, de la VillehtSlio's ' Airs Basques. ,
Thus the Austrian violin-player at Milan began the Adagio of tf
Kreutzer Sonata (Mendelssohn's letter. May ]831); and thus too
does Mendelssohn's own Quartet in Eb begin with a grupetto.
SONG.
class of songs was also heard in the Moorish
provinces. [See SEGUIDILLA.]
(3) The third group is the most worthy of study.
Of all Spanish songs those of Andalusia are the
most beautiful. In them the eastern element is
deepest and richest, and the unmistakable sign
of its presence are the following traits : — first, a
profusion of ornaments around the central me
lody; secondly, a 'poly rhythmic' cast of music —
the simultaneous existence of different rhythms
in different parts ; and thirdly, the peculiarity of
the melodies being based on a curious scale,
which is apparently founded on the intervals of
the Phrygian and Mixolydian modes.1 Another
indication of its presence is the guttural sound
of the voices. Of these characteristics, the most
obvious is the rhythm. In the Andalusian songs
there are often three different rhythms in one
bar, none predominating, but each equally impor
tant, as the different voices are in real polyphonic
music. For example —
etc.
SONG.
599
or it may be that the accents of the accompani
ments do not at all correspond with the accents
of the melody ; thus : —
r3zzl=
_=_
-»- -*-
The songs of Southern Spain are generally
of a dreamy, melancholy, and passionate type ;
especially the canas or playeras, which are
lyrical. These are mostly for one voice only,
as their varied rhythm and uncertain time pre
clude the possibility of their being sung in parts.
1 See 'An Introduction to the Study of National Music' (p. 300;, by
the late Carl Engel.
In certain cases they are, however, sung in
unison or in thirds. They always begin with a
high note, sustained as long as the breath will
allow ; and then the phrase descends with in
numerable turns, trills, and embellishments into
the real melody. The canas are inferior, as
regards simplicity both of poetry and music, to
the dance-songs — fandangos, rondeiias, and mala-
gueiias,2 which have also more symmetry and
more animation. They usually consist of two divi
sions ; viz. the copla (couplet), and the ritornel,
which is for the accompanying instrument, and
is frequently the longer and the more important
of the two, the skilful guitar-player liking to
have ample scope to exhibit his execution.
The only other songs of Spain which remain to
be noticed are the serenades, the patriotic songs,
and the tiranas — these last not accompanied by
dancing. In the artistic songs of Spain there is
nothing on which it is profitable to dwell. If
publishers' collections may be accepted as evi
dence, the favourite composers of these songs
would appear to be Tapia, Sors, Leon, Garcia,
Murgia, Saldoni, Eslava,3 etc. But much the
best songs of even these composers are those
written in the national vein, and with a faithful
adherence to national characteristics in respect
of melody, harmony, and rhythm. The limited
capabilities of the guitar and mandoline, the in
variable accompanying instruments, have natu
rally dwarfed and stunted the development of
accompaniments in Spanish songs.
The collection of Spanish songs in which the harmony
is accurately transcribed is entitled —
'Cantos Espaiiolea ' : by Dr. Eduardj Ocon (with a
preface in Spanish and German.).
See also :—
4 Echos d'Eapagno ' ; by P. Lacome and J. Puig y Al-
subide.
' Auswahl Spanischer und Portugiesischer Lieder flir
eine oder zwei Stiimnen, mit deutscher Uobersetzung
versehen ' ; by H. K.
And for information on the subject, see : —
'Historia de la Musica E?panola'; by Soriano Fuertes
(4 vols.)
' Diccionario biografico-bibliografico ' ; by Saldoni. (4
' History of Spanish Literature : ; by Ticknor. (3 vols.)
Vol. 19, No. 1 of the 'Acad6mie royale de Eelgicjue' ;
Gevaert.
'Spanische Mu ik'; Mend 1*3 Lexikon.
PORTUGAL.
The popular music of Portugal bears a close
affinity to that of Spain, especially in dance
tunes. But there are clearly marked differences.
The Portuguese is more pensive and tranquil than
the fiery, excitable Spaniard ; and as national
music never fails to be more or less a reflection
of national character, there is a vein of repose
and subdued melancholy, and an absence of
exaggeration in Portuguese music, such as are
seldom, if ever, found in the more vivacious and
stirring music of Spain. From the same cause,
or perhaps because Moorish ascendancy was of
briefer duration in Portugal than in Spain, there
2 Songs and dances often derive their names from the provinces or
towns in which they are indigenous ; thus rondena. from Bonda,
•»iala0uena from Malaga, etc., etc.
3 Though the last two composers have made contributions to
song-literature, they have really won their laurels iu other fields
of music. [See EsLiVA. vol. i. p.
600
SONG.
is less of ornament in Portuguese than in Spanish
music. And the dance-music of Portugal is
somewhat monotonous, as compared with that of
Spain.
The popular poetry of the two countries has
also much in common. Most of the Portuguese
epic-romances are of Spanish origin, and none
are anterior to the isth century. Even at the
present day the Spanish and Portuguese romance-
forms are identical, except where a slight di
vergence necessarily springs from differences of
language and nationality. In the lyrics of both
races the rhyme follows the assonance principle,
and is a more important element of composition
than the metre.
The dance-songs are always written in the
binary rhythm ; and these are the least interest
ing of Portuguese songs. Though much less
used than in Spain, the guitar is always em
ployed for the fado, a dance-song seldom heard
outside towns, and properly belonging to the
lowest classes of urban populations, though it
has recently acquired some popularity among the
higher classes. There are many varieties of
fados or fadinhos, but they all have this same
rhythm : —
Other kinds of dance-songs are the ckula, for
accompanying which the machinho [see MA
CHETE, vol. i. p. 640 6] or the viola chuleira is used ;
the malhao, the canninha verde, the landum, the
fandango, and the vareira.
But Portugal (in this respect unlike Spain)
also possesses a great quantity of genuine
popular songs, which are not in any sense dance-
music ; and these are especially characteristic
productions of the country. Though, as a rule,
written in modern tonality, it is in them that
the traces of oriental influence are most visible.
There is about them a careless ease, tinged with
melancholy, which is the secret of their charm.
They are generally sung by one voice without any
accompaniment, and to the ears of foreigners
have the sound of recitatives, as the rhythmical
idea is often wholly obscured by the singer.1
Scarcely more rhythmical are the festival-songs
sung on certain days of the year ; of which
the principal ones are '0 Sao Joao,' sung on
St. John the Baptist's day ; ' As Janeiros,' sung
at the New Year ; and ' Os Reis,' sung at the
Epiphany.2 ' 0 Sao Joao' is a pretty little song,
J Nos. 3, 7, and 11 in the collection called 'Album de Musicas
Nacionaes Portuguezas,' by J. A. Bibas, will give the reader some
Idea of this kind of song ; but they are spoilt by the modern accom
paniment.
2 'As Janeiros' and 'Os Reis' are especially sung on the respective
eves of the New Year and of the Epiphany. The minstrels go from
door to door In the evening, singing the praises of the inmates of the
houses, and accompanying their songs with metal triangles, bells,
etc. They are generally rewarded by the master of the house with
money, sausages, or dried fig«. But if they get nothing they sing—
'Esta casa cheira a breu
Aqui mora algum juden'
(This house smells of tar ; Some Jew lives here) ; or else—
'Esta casa cheira a unto
Aqui mora algum det'unto*
(This house smells of ointment ; there is a dead body In It).
SONG.
usually sung, as the Portuguese peasants love
to sing, in thirds. The melody is —
Allegretto.
j , I.
!n'i
•1 J 1"
— * — s!~~
K m
f—^-
— — * 1*^2 —
— curiously recalling a portion of the Marseillaise.
Excepting the influence exercised upon the
ecclesiastical music of Portugal during the i6th
and 1 7th centuries by the Flemish school, Portu
guese music may be said to have escaped all
foreign influences, until it fell under the spell of
the Italian opera, — a spell which has been strong
upon it for a century or more. The modinha,
the only kind of artistic song that Portugal has
as yet produced, is its direct offspring. Though
written by trained musicians, and sung by edu
cated people, both in character and form it ia
purely exotic, a mixture of the French romance
and the Italian aria. The modinhas were ex
tremely popular in the first part of the present
century ; nor has there since been any great
decline of their popularity. As artistic music,
they cannot be said to hold a high rank, but
the best of them are, at least, simple, fresh, and
natural. Such are 'A Serandinha,' 'A Sal via,'
'As peneiras,' 'Mariquinhas meu amor.'3 The
favourite composers of modinhas are Domingos
Schioppetta; two monks, J. M. da Silva and
Jos£ Marquis de Santa Rita ; and Frondoni. an
Italian long resident in Lisbon, and author of the
popular hymn of the revolution of Maria da
Fonte (1848).
The best collections of Portuguese gongs are the 'Album
de Music as naciones Portuguezas,' by Kibas; the 'Jor-
nal de Modinhas com acompanhamento de Cravo pelos
Milhores Autores,' by F. D. Milcent; and 'Musicas e
Cancoas populares colligidas da tradicao,' by Adeimo
Antonio das Neves e Mello (filho).
Information upon the subject has been most difficult
to procure, since little seems to exist except in the pre
faces to the collections. The writer oi' the present
article is indebted to Senor Bernardo V. Moreira de ba
above all other sources of information for the substance
of this notice of Portuguese songs : and to him her warm
acknowledgments are due.
ENGLAND.
Never within historic times has England been
indifferent to the art of music. As France gave
birth to the ' Trouveres,' and Germany to the
' Minnesingers,' so did England in a remote age
produce her own Bards, and afterwards her
Scalds and Minstrels, her Gleemen and Harpers ;
all of whom were held in high repute by their
countrymen. The earliest known piece of music
in harmony is the part-song ' Sumer is icumen
in,' written about 1225 by John of Fornsete, a
3 The last two are contained in the collection by Bibas,
reference is made in a preceding note.
SONG.
SONG.
601
monk of Reading Abbey, and itself implying a
long previous course of study and practice.1 And
there is record of a company or brotherhood
formed by the merchants of London at the end of
the 1 3th century for the encouragement of musical
and poetical compositions. With this purpose they
assembled periodically at festive meetings ; and
their rules were very similar to those of the
German ' Meistersingers,' though their influence
on contemporary music was much less widely dif
fused. This however is, at least in part, explained
by the reluctance of the London brotherhood to
admit any but members to its periodical meet
ings.2 Of the abundance of popular tunes in the
1 4th century, evidence is supplied by the number
of hymns written to them. For instance, 'Sweetest
of all, sing,' ' Have good-day, my leman dear,' and
six others, were secular stage-songs, to which
Kichard Ledrede, Bishop of Ossory (1318-1360)
wrote Latin hymns. (Chappell, p. 765.)
While the Minstrels flourished, notation was
difficult and uncertain, and they naturally
trusted to memory or improvisation for the tunes
to which their tales should be sung. But with
the end of the I5th century they disappeared,
their extinction accelerated by the invention of
printing ; for when the pedlar had begun to
traverse the country with his penny books and
his songs on broadsheets, the Minstrel's day was
past : his work was being done by a better
agency.3 To the time of the Minstrels belongs
however the famous ' Battle of Agincourt ' song,
the tune of which is given by Mr. Chappell* as
follows, with the date of 1415.
Our king went forth to Nor - man - dy, With
grace and might of chi - val - ry, The God for him wrought
~~>r
" « *
~P5~1
j-*— |
marv'-lous-ly, Where-fore Eng-land may call and cry, 'De -
• o
gra
ti - as!'
In the period between 1485 and 1553, which
covers the reigns of Henry VII. and Henry
VIII., social and political ballads multiplied
fast ; and among the best-known productions
1 See vol. lii. p. 268 ; also SUMER is ICUMEN IN.
2 See Eiley's 'Liber Custumarum,' p. 589.
Chappell's 'Popular Music,1 vol. i. p. 45.
4 Mr. Chappell further says that when Henry V entered the city
of London in triumph after the battle of Agincourt. . . . 'boys with
pleasing voices were placed In artificial turrets singing verses in his
praise. But Henry ordeied this part of the pagentry to cease, and
commanded that for the future no ditties should be made and sung
by Minstrels or "others," in praise of the recent victory; "for that
he would whollie have the praise and thanks altogether given to
God." Nevertheless, among many others, a minstrel piece soon
appeared on the Seyge of Harfiett (Harfleur) and the Battayle of
Agynkourte, "evidently," says Warton, "adapted to the harp," and
of which he has printed some portions. (Hist. Eng. Poet. vol. ii.
p. 257.) Also the following song (see above) which Percy has printed
in his Eeliques of Ancient Poetry, from a MS. in the Pepysian
Library, and Stafford Smith, in his collection of English Songs (1779
pol.), in fac-siraile of the old notation, as well as in modern score.'—
'Popular Music,' i. 39.
of those reigns are 'The King's Ballad,' by
Henry VIII. himself; ' Westron wynde,' 'The
three ravens,' and 'John Dory.' It should be
noticed here that many variations in the copies
of old tunes indicate uncertainty in oral tradi
tions. Of the leading note — which the Church
Modes do not recognise, but which has been very
popular in English music — frequent variations
are met with. But the copies exhibit most
uncertainty as to whether the interval of the
seventh should be minor or major. The general
opinion now is that the old popular music of
European countries was based upon the same
scale or mode as the modern major scale, i.e. the
Ionian mode ; but numerous examples of other
tonalities are extant.5 Thus, among others, ' The
King's Ballad' and 'Westron wynde,' agree in
some of their many versions with the Latin or
Greek Dorian mode. The easy Ionian mode — il
modo lascivo as it was termed — was the favourite
of strolling singers and ballad-mongers, but the
scholar and musician of the i6th century dis
dained it. Even if he sometimes stooped to use
it, he felt it to be derogatory to his art. The
subsequent adoption of the modern system by
cultivated musicians in the next century was at
tributable to the influence of Italian music.
Of secular music antecedent to the middle of
the 1 6th century but little has come down to us.
Its principal relics are the songs in the Fayrfax
MS. This manuscript, which once belonged to
Dr. Robert Fayrfax, an eminent composer of the
reigns of Henry VII. and Henry VIII., consists
of forty-nine songs by the best musicians of that
time.6 They are all written in 2, 3 and 4 parts, in
the contrapuntal style ; some in the mixed
measure — common time in one part, and triple
time in another — which was common at the
end of the I5th century. But owing to the want
of bars the time is often difficult to discover,
and there is, likewise, a great confusion of accents.
During the latter half of the i6th century musi
cians of the first rank seldom composed airs of
the short rhythmical kind required for ballads.
They generally wrote in the church scales, and
there was a clear line of demarcation between
their works and the ballads of the common
people.7 The best-known ballads of Queen
Elizabeth's reign, from 1558 to 1603, were 'The
carman's whistle,' 'The British Grenadiers,'
' Near Woodstock Town,' 'The bailiff's daughter
of Islington,' 'A poor soul sat sighing,' 'Green-
sleeves,' ' The friars of Orders Gray,' and ' The
Frog Galliard.' This last, by John Dowland, is
almost the only instance to be found in the
Elizabethan period of a popular ballad-tune
known to be from the hand of a celebrated com
poser. Dowland originally wrote it as a part-
song, to the words ' Now, 0 now. I needs must
part,' but afterwards adapted it for one voice,
with accompaniment for the lute. This practice
5 Miss 0. Prescott, 'Form or Design in Vocal Music,' Musical
World, vol. 59.
6 See Burney, vol. ii. p. 539.
7 See Chappell's ' Popular Music,' vol. i. p. 306. Most of the inform
ation In the text relating to Ballads has been taken from Mr.
t'liappell's work.
602
SONG.
of writing songs for either one or many voices
seems to have been common in England, as in
Italy ; and in both countries alike the lute or
theorbo sustained the under parts when sung by
one voice.1 Dowland's contemporary, Thomas
Ford, published songs for one or four voices, one
of which, ' Since first I saw your face,' not only
still retains its popularity, but is remarkable as
being one of the earliest melodies written by a
trained musician in modern tonality.
With the i yth century there commenced a
period of transition in the history of music, and
especially in the history of the Song. This period
was distinguished, as Mr. Hullah has observed,
by the acceptance of many new principles in
musical composition, and by a steady growth of
skill in instrumental performance ; but its most
marked characteristic was a constant increase of
attention to the conformity of notes with words ;
that is, to ' the diligent study of everything
that goes to perfect what is called Expression
in music.' 2 And this was a natural develop
ment of the monodic revolution whose origin
in Italy has already been described.3 But the
success of the new departure was at first as
partial and imperfect in England as it was else
where. In Burney's words, ' Harmony and con
trivance were relinquished without compensation.
Simplicity indeed was obtained, but without grace,
accent, or invention. And this accounts for the
superiority of Church music over secular in this
period over every part of Europe, where harmony,
fugue, canon and contrivance were still cultivated,
while the first attempts at air and recitative were
awkward, and the basses thin and unmeaning.
Indeed the composers of this kind of music had
the sole merit to boast of affording the singers an
opportunity of letting the words be understood,
as their melodies in general consisted of no more
notes than syllables, while the treble accompani
ment, if it subsisted, being in unison with the
voice part, could occasion no embarrassment nor
confusion.' *
To the very beginning of the 1 7th century be
longs Robert Johnson's beautiful air 'As I walked
forth one summer's day'; and about 1609 Fera-
bosco, an Italian by parentage but a resident in
England, published a folio volume of 'Ayres,'
which includes the fine song 'Shall I seek to ease
my grief.' He was also a contributor of several
pieces to the collection published by Sir Wm.
Leighton in 1614 under the title of 'The Teares
and Lamentacions of a sorrowfulle Soule.' But
the contents of this collection were mostly songs
in four parts. It was reserved for Henry Lawes5
(born 1595), a professed writer of songs, to be
the first Englishman who made it his study to
give expression to words by musical sounds.
1 Orlando Gibbons's 'Silver swan,' a 5-part madrigal, is given in
the ' Echos du Temps passeY as a soprano solo with accompaniment—
' Le chant du crois6 ' — an unjustifiable act no doubt, but a strong
testimony to Gibbons's melody. 'In going to my lonely bed,' by
Edwardes— 50 years earlier than Gibbons— might be similarly treated.
2 Hullah's 'Transition Period,' p. 183. 3 See MONODIA.
4 Burney's ' History,' vol. iii. p. 395.
5 The reader will find the dates, biographies, and lists of works of
the composers mentioned in the text under the separate notices of
them in this Dictionary. j
SONG.
Compared with the Madrigalists, Lawes was not
a scientific musician. Moreover he failed in the
development of his ideas, and bis melody is often
fragmentary ; but the honour ascribed to him in
Milton's well-known lines was justly his due.
He-
First taught our English music how to span
Words with just note and accent.6
His care in setting words to music was recognised
by the chief poets of his day, and they were glad
to have their verses composed by him. One of
his best-known songs, ' Sweet Echo,' is taken from
Milton's Comus. Several books of 'Ayres and
Dialogues for one, two or three Voices,' were pub
lished by him, with assistance from his brother,
William Lawes, whose fame as a song-writer
chiefly rests on his music to Herrick's words
'Gather ye rosebuds while ye may.' The strong
partiality displayed in the 1 7th century for 'Ayres
and Dialogues1 can plainly be traced to the in
fluence upon all musicians of the Italian recita
tive style. Henry Lawes was undoubtedly familiar
with the works of his Italian contemporaries and
recent predecessors ; and especially with Monte-
verde, whose blemishes and beauties his own
music reflects. A good illustration both of his
skill in setting words and of the fragmentary
character of his melody will be found in his music
to Waller's ' While I listen to thy voice,' which
is here reprinted exactly from the original :
To a Lady singing.7
Xk rf» _!-••• <?'••!• 'H« £•*
~ t p> > '
etif — 1 f r ; g ^ — * i* U Hg-F
• «
Ali£ ^ g — L->l K f. g_l 1 — 1 1
^J 1* - "
While I list - en to thy voyce, Chloris, I feels
«y u — j r— j 1 — ^r^ - 1^1
-W^- ;Bt±
1
s — w 1 j
— •- — ,* P" -•
• ^~^-\
— : 0 — w-7 — 1^- 1 \M S — '
—*—><=?-L-l
my life de - cay, that pow'rlullnoysecal'
1 1 It n —
s my fleet - ing
— 7TZ — -~23 P~= P-
— » ^
I ^ 1 U ~\ *
1 1L | I I k,
t=t=±&£L
-JL^^ r ^' m ' ~=3^-$
soul a-way ; O sup - press that ma-gick sound,
- — _zLt — jg —
AVhich destroyes without a wound ! Pea
ce ! peace ! Chloris,
— J « «_a"LJ <^-^
— f— — : — i
s See Sonnet addressed to Lawes by Milton in 1645-6.
7 Page 13 of • Ayres and Dialogues For One, Two and Three vc
By Henry Lawes Servant to his late Matle in his publick and private
Musick. The First Booke. London, Printed by T. H. for John Play-
ford, and are to be sold at his Shop, in the Inner Temple, near IB
Church door, 1653.' (The words are by Waller.) Reprinted In Book I.
of Playford's ' Treasury of Musick ' in 1669. The soug will be fouua
with au expanded accompaniment in Hullah's Euglish Songs,
SONG.
r» — — * — *'~ — s — *•
(• (• *Li ^13
z^n±i£— £— i 3^-
peace, or sing-ing
dye, that together thou anc
L I to heav'n may
c 1 1
zJ — -
^L- -• — ^3-
; — \~^ —
_•!>•! £-? "1
SONG.
603
•--•—«— ?t3i^~?c:
-^ L- L_ ^1 ^
go ;
for all we know of what the bless-ed doe a -
1 "1 1 w
q • M • 1m
\
'7L
^•^
I- ^ 1^ 1^
i* er >
:
bove, is that they
sing.
and that they
love.
rzj m • m
A SI
™
- f-^
9
1
~
1 _
Many other examples might be adduced, but the
above will suffice.
Before descending further the stream of English
'Song,' it were well to remind the reader that
the custom of poets in the i6th and I yth centuries
to write new words to favourite old tunes has
made it very difficult, if not impossible, to assign
precise dates to many ballads. Thus, in Sir
Philip Sidney's poems the heading, ' To the air
of1 etc., often an Italian or French air, constantly
recurs ; and many of the ballad tunes were sung
to three or four sets of words, which were of dif
ferent dates, and had little or nothing in common
with one another. Among songs to be found in
the principal collections of the first half of the
I7th century, the tune of ' Cheerily and merrily'
was afterwards sung to George Herbert's ' Sweet
day,' and is better known by its later name.
' Stingo, or oil of barley,' ' The country lass,'
and 'Cold and raw,' had all the same tune.
Such was the case also with ' When the stormy
winds do blow' and 'You gentlemen of England,'
and in many another instance.
From the outbreak of the Civil War until the
Restoration music languished in England. The
Protectorate sanctioned only the practice of uni
sonous metrical psalmody ; though ballads of the
time of the Commonwealth (1649-1659) have
been preserved, and among them are ' Love lies
bleeding,' 'When the King enjoys his own again,'
and 'I would I were in my own country.' The
Restoration of the Stuarts in 1660 introduced a
great change, and during the last forty years of
the j 7th century a lighter and more melodious
kind of music than England had previously heard
was in vogue. For Charles II. in his exile had
grown fond of French dance music, which was
not composed on the church scales, as the Eng
lish ' Fancies,' etc. were ; and with this new taste
he infected his kingdom. Ballads too came into
popular favour again, as the King was partial to
lively tunes and strongly marked rhythm. The
cultivation of music became so general that even
domestic servants could sing at sight ; and taverns
ceased to be the only places of musical entertain
ment. Banister's Concerts at the end of 1672
have been already noticed [vol. i. p. 134^] and
a vocal concert was first heard without the ac
cessories of ale and tobacco in 1681, at a public
concert-room in Villiers Street, York Buildings.
The concerts of Thos. Britton ' The Small-coal
man' also took place towards the end of this
century. [Vol. i. p. 277 a.] Of the abundant
ballads of this period the most celebrated per
haps are 'Here's a health unto His Majesty,'
' Come lasses and lads,' ' Barbara Allen,' ' Under
the greenwood tree,' 'Dulce Domum,' ' Lilli-
burlero,' and ' May Fair,' now better known as
'Golden slumbers.' It should be noted that the
educated musicians of England were about this
time very much under the influence of tlie
Italian and French schools. The style of Pel-
ham Humphrey (born in 1647), whom Charles
II. sent to France to study under Lully, was
entirely founded on that of his teacher ; and
on his return to England Humphrey effected a
revolution in English music. Some of the results
obtained by his work are described by Mr. Hul-
lah in the following passage : — ' In place of the
overlapping phrases of the old masters, growing
out of one another like the different members of
a Gothic tower, we have masses of harmony sub
ordinated to one rhythmical idea ; in place of
sustained and lofty flights, we have shorter and
more timorous ones — these even relieved by fre
quent halts and frequent divergences ; and in
lieu of repetition on presentation of a few passages
under different circumstances, a continually
varying adaptation of music to changing senti
ment of words, and the most fastidious observance
of their emphasis and quantity.'1 Few artists
ever exercised a more powerful influence on their
countrymen and contemporaries than Humphrey,
and his work was accomplished in the brief space
of seven years. He returned from Paris in 1667,
and died, at the early age of 27, in 1674. His
song, ' I pass all my hours in a shady old grove,'
which has hardly yet ceased to be sung, is a
good example of his style ; and other songs by
him may be found in the various collections of
the time. There too are preserved the songs of
a fellow-student in the Chapel Royal to whom he
taught much, viz. John Blow. In 1700 Blow
published by subscription a volume of his own
songs under the title of 'Amphion Anglicus,'
and his song 'It is not that I love you less,'
shows that he was capable of both tenderness and
grace in composition. Matthew Lock is also
worthy of mention, for he wrote ' The delights of
the bottle,' a most popular song in its day, and
the honour of an elegy by Purcell was paid to
him at his death in 1677.
Had Henry Purcell never written anything
but songs, he would still have established his
claim to be regarded as the greatest of English
musicians, for upon this ground he stands alone.
In dignity and grandeur, in originality and beauty
he has no equal among English song-writers.
After his death these were collected, under the
l Hullah's ' Transition Period of Musical History.' p. 203.
604
SONG.
SONG.
title of 'Orpheus Britannicus' ; and ' Full fathom
five,' ' Come unto these yellow sands,' ' From
rosy bowers,' ' I attempt from Love's sickness to
fly,' and others, were universal favourites down
to our own times. He contributed several pieces
to Playford's publication, ' Choice Ayres, Songs
and Dialogues,' but for his finest songs the reader
must turn to his operas, and to the tragedies
and plays for which he composed the incidental
music. A song which Purcell wrote at the age
of 17, 'When I am laid in earth' or 'Dido's
lament ' (from Nahum Tate's ' Dido and ^Eneas')
should be noted for the skill with which the
whole song is constructed on a 'ground bass' of
five bars.1 This is repeated without intermis
sion in the lowest part, but so unconstrained
are the upper parts, so free and developed is
the rhythm, so pathetic and varied is the melody,
that the device would ctrtainly escape the ob
servation of a hearer, and even the performer
might be unconscious of it.
Dido's Lament.
PP (Ground Bass). HENRY PURCELL.
m
^
=t
Voice.
When I am laid, am laid
String Quartet.
Earth, may my
A-
3
^^
wrongs ere - ate No trou-ble, no trouble in thy breast ;
—I L
-JL^J_'^:
SI
^
frf.r'rr
cres. -
^z=$*
<S>-
h-
l^=gl
~f— *\\-
1 J
1 See Hullah's preface to ' English Syngs of the 17th and 18th
centuries.'
but ah ! for - get my fate. Be -
PP/
— - — p — 1
• F i — f— «—
Et^f^^—
mem-ber me but
-x I i ^— — -
ah! fur -
get my fate.
— i — : 1* •
\^2 |± ,
2 — it'iH-^^Ei
tf |/
J£*-
w ,
! -&-
jjUj "
I-,
•* "i •""
Uf^ ~*
^_,
_
— 1 1 —
f~~*" A
_*_f 1_
^ I"
tf= ~?-r
Between 1683 and 1690 Purcell devoted him
self to the study of the great Italian masters, and
the results are manifest in his music. He did not
indeed lose any of his individuality ; but the melo
dies of his songs were henceforth smoother and
more flowing, and there was more variety of ac
companiment. A common fault of the music of
Purcell's time was a too servile adherence on the
part of the composer to the meaning of the text.
True, the notes should always reflect the force of
the words they illustrate ; but here the changing
sense of the words was too often blindly fol
lowed to the sacrifice of everything like musical
construction. Purcell shook himself clear of these
defects ; for with his fine genius for melody,
his native taste in harmony, and his thoroughly
scientific education, no strong or permanent hold
could be laid on him by the extravagances of any
school. — To complete this rapid survey of the
1 7th century, it remains only to mention John
Eccles and Richard Leveridge, who were popular
composers at its close. To Leveridge we owe the
famous songs 'Black-eyed Susan' and 'The Boast
Beef of Old England,' which were sung every
where throughout the 1 8th century, and are still
' familiar as household words.'
In the first quarter of the i8th century the
popularity of ballads was not as great, but it rose
again under George II. with the introduction of
Ballad-operas, of which the 'Beggars' Opera'
(1727) was the first. These operas formed the
first reaction of the popular taste against the
Italian music. They were spoken dramas with
songs interspersed; and the songs were set to
old ballad tunes, or imitations of them. [See
ENGLISH OPERA, vol. i. p. 4896.] Between 1702
and 1745 a multitude of ballads and popular
songs appeared, of which, among many others,
the following became celebrated, 'Old King Cole,^
' Down among the dead men, 'The Vicar of Bray,
• Ct-ase your funning,' * Drink to me only,' etc.
SONG.
SONG.
605
TJntil the time we have now reached — that is,
about the middle of the i8th century — ballads,
as a class of songs, may be said to have retained
their popular origin. Not a few had, doubtless,
already been written by scholars, but for the
most part they were the spontaneous outpour
ing of uncultivated thought and feeling. Hence
forth however, they were to be a special branch
of art pursued by regular musicians. At this
point, therefore, a few words may be fittingly
introduced on the form of popular English bal
lads.1 In dance or march or ballad music, which
has grown from the recitation of words to a chant
or to a short rhythmical tune, the musical form
or design is found to reside chiefly in the rhythm,
and not in the balance of keys. The ordinary
rhythm of ballads was the even fashion of four-
bar phrases, as for instance in ' Now is the month
of Maying ' or ' The hunt is up ' : —
ist Plirase
i.
The hunt is up, the hunt is up. And
_2- 4. 2nd Phrase i.
~i r ,
— «-u«_
r-
33
it is well - nigh day, And Har - ry our King is
2- 3- 4-
f*» c — i
rfej^
— • —
r^ru
!?=£=
— F-= — F — H
r— I 1 H
— *-^» — • —
\-t=A — *-
->•«* —
-J 1 |]
gone hunting To bring his
deer to bay.
The three-bar phrase rhythm is generally met
with in the jig and hornpipe tunes of England,
such as ' Bartholomew Fair ': —
Ad
zooks che went the other day to
i — ^^
- ps
1 -J— _. — _i- -m—
tf— • * •—
=&d
Lou - don town. la Smith-field such gaz - ing, such
2 3
thrust- ing and squeez-ing was nev - er known. A
I
zit - ty of wood ! Some volks do call it Bartledom Fair, But
i 2 ?
che's zure nought hut kings and queens live there. 2
but it sometimes occurs in songs of other kinds.
Of the rhythm in ' My little pretty one ' —
She is a joy - ly one, and gen-tie as
can be.
With a beck she comes a - non, With a wink she will be gone ;
•i
T=J
m
No doubt she is a - lone of all that ev - er I see.
which has three phrases of l^wo bars each and a
fourth of three bars, there are several other ex
amples ; and indeed there are abundant varieties
of irregular rhythms ; but it may be held, as a
general conclusion, that the musical rhythm fol
lows the variations of the rhythm and metre of the
words, and varies with them. And this tendency
of the rhythm is seen to be natural when we reflect
that popular music began with the recitation or
declamation of historical poems, in which the
music was subordinate to the words. Compound
time is very common in English ballads, especially
during and after the reign of Charles II, and
may be accounted for by the influence of the
French dance-music, which Charles II. brought
into England. In modulation they exhibit but
little variety. The most frequent arrangement
is the half-close on the dominant and the leading-
note preceding the tonic at the end of the melody,
as in ' The bailiff's daughter of Islington': —
±^=t
£
3
1
There was a youth, and a well - be - lov-ed youth. And
^
he was a squire's son ; He lov - ed the bai - liffs
m
daugh-ter dear, That liv - ed in Is -ling- ton.
In another arrangement the half-close is on
the subdominant, and the penultimate note is the
supertonic. In minor-key ballads the relative
major key often takes the place which is held
by the dominant key in the major-key ballads.
Another peculiarity of many old ballads are
Burdens. Sometimes the burden was sung by
the bass or basses underneath the melody, and
to support it, as in 'Sumer is icumen in'; or it
took the shape of ' ditties,' the ends of old bal
lads, introduced to eke out the words of the
story to the length of the musical phrase, as in
the ' Willow Song ' —
m=S=\
h 1 1
» | J ._d — s
.
-J^-*-3
riA~*~
'~i~
-i^
—,
*
'•>
-« — i — M
tf-^-*— i~rj y ' 0 •' =* -
My lit - tie pret - ty one, My pret-ty hon - ey one,
1 The remarks in the text are largely borrowed from an article by
Miss 0. Prescott, entitled 'Form or Design in Vocal Music.' See
Musical World, 1881, col. 59.
: The reiteration of the final note in the cadences of this song
would seem to indicate an Irish origin. [See vol. ii. p. 216.]
\M,/ **
^J
The poor
soul sat sigh -ing by a
si - ca-
J
more
H
5
~j
! d _
. J
.NT
• a
1
• •
N J a,
J
p ~
-~
i
tree, Sing
•wil - low, wil-low, wil-low. With his hand in
his
606
SONG.
:t=
besom and his head up-on his knee. Oh ! wil-low, wil-low, wil-low,
wil-low, Oh! wil-low, wil-low, wil-low, wil-low Shall be my gar-
land; Sing all a green wil-low, wil-low. wil-low, wil-low, Ah
me! the green wil-low must be my gar - land.
In this case the burden is sung continuously by
the solo voice, but in other instances it is taken
up by the chorus at the end of a solo song ; or
solo and chorus combine, as for instance in the
burden of ' Sir Eglamore ': —
Solo Chorus
i
Sir Eg - la - more, that val-iant knight, Fa la
He took his sword and went to fight,
Solo
Fa la Ian - ky down dil - ly.
To the present writer some characteristics of
English airs appear to be — the absence of chro
matic notes in the melody, and of modulations
into distantly related keys in the harmony. The
tonic and dominant, and occasionally the sub-
dominant, are often the only chords used in
harmonising the tune. Another and most charac
teristic feature is the frequent occurrence of
diatonic passing notes. Of this peculiarity ' Rule
Britannia,' or ' The bailiff's daughter of Isling
ton ' are good examples. A third is the constant
habit of English tunes to begin with the domin
ant on the last beat of a bar, and either descend
or ascend to the tonic for the first beat of the
new bar, as in « The hunt is up,' ' The British
Grenadiers,' ' Rule Britannia, 'and numbers more.
The partiality of English composers for the lead
ing note has already been noticed.
The iSth century was rich in popular songs ;
and for most of them, especially of those which
were produced in its latter half, we are indebted
to educated musicians. The immense popularity
which some of them acquired and long retained
would entitle them to be regarded as national
songs. Viewed in regard to musical structure
they are generally ballads. As a rule, they have
an easy accompaniment, often nothing more than
the melody harmonised, a marked and striking
rhythm, and a simple pleasing melody repeated
for each stanza. Very popular in his day was
— s — r n
K—
• P r •
* m II
i i
r r
-- - • II
^ u
1 U
lanky down dilly,
And as he rode o'er hill and dale, All
Chorus
1
i U i
I
*S
PS
k- p* k-
•> J ps
J
\ S N
• J
- •
• •
•TT- . g 1
arm'd up-on his
• .
shirt of mail, Fa la
— i — — n
la fa la la
— N — fc — "5
=v
33E
•-•-*-
1
SONG.
Henry Carey — probably the composer of 'God
save the King ' — who published a hundred songs
and ballads under the title of 'The Musical
Century'; and the gems of this collection, on
which Carey's posthumous fame mainly rests,
were 'Death and the lady,' and 'Sally in our
Alley* — now oftener sung to the older tune of
' The Country lass.' William Boyce (born 1710)
claims a recognition, if only for the spirited song
' Come, cheer up my lads' (Heart of Oak), which
he wrote to Garrick's words in 1759. In the year
of Boyce's birth, a still greater composer was
born, namely Arne, whom a competent critic has
adjudged to be the most national of all our song-
writers. ' Rule Britannia ' was written by Arne
in 1740, as a finale for the masque of 'Alfred';
and passing thence from mouth to mouth, soon
grew to be pre-eminent among national airs.
Wagner has said that the first eight notes of
' Rule Britannia ' contain the whole character of
the English people. If this is so, we may well be
proud of it. The obligations of the English people
to these opera writers, and of the latter to them,
have been reciprocal ; for while some of the best
national airs are due to their imagination, they in
turn courted applause by the free introduction of
current popular songs into their operas.1 In the
same year with 'Rule Britannia 'Arne produced his
beautiful settings of the songs in 'As you like it';
and the songs in other plays of Shakspeare were
afterwards treated by him with equal felicity.
The most perfect perhaps of these is his ' Where
the bee sucks' of ' The Tempest.' In later years,
however, a change crept over Arne's style, and
a change for the worse. He came to crowd his
airs with florid passages in a way which is con
spicuous in the songs of his opera ' Artaxerxes.'
Passing on, we come to William Jackson of
Exeter, who was thirty years younger than Arne.
A certain tameness and insipidity about most
of Jackson's songs speedily relegated them to
obscurity ; but he had his hour of celebrity, and
there was a time when no collection was deemed
complete without his ' Encompassed in an angel's
frame/ ' When first this humble roof I knew,'
from Burgoyne's ' Lord of the Manor,' or 'Time
has not thinned my flowing hair,' from Jackson's
Twelve Canzonets. Among his contemporaries,
but a little junior to him, were Thomas Carter,
Samuel Arnold, Samuel Webbe, and Charles
Dibdin ; the last a patriotic ballad-writer rather
than a musician. The pathos of 'Tom Bowling'
has rescued it from neglect, but only by sailors
are Dibdin's other songs remembered now. Their
fate is intelligible enough, for they evince no real
musical skill, and the words of most of them are
poor. But however defective these songs may
have been as works of art, they will always
merit an honourable mention for the pleasure
i Most indeed of the best songs of a period extending from Purcell'!
time down to the early part of the present century were once a;
were embedded in dramatic pieces ; but those pieces have faded ii
oblivion, while the songs have survived, without their original en
vironment, in the favour of successive generations. As dramatic
forms of song these compositions lie outside the scope of the Prese"|
article, but as national and popular songs they come within it. A Ms
of 40 operas, entirely set to current popular airs, and produced
between 1728 and 1740, is given under ENGLISH OPERA, vol. i. p. 489.
SONG.
which they gave to England's sailors in the days
of her greatest naval glory. To Dibdin's gener
ation also belonged John Percy, the composer of
•Wapping Old Stairs,' and James Hook, best
known for 'The lass of Richmond Hill,' and
<'Twas within a mile of Edinboro' town/ a
pseudo-Scotch song, like Carter's ' 0 Nanny,
wilt thou gang with me ? ' Two better musicians
than these appeared a very few years later, viz.
William Shield and Stephen Storace, both re
markable for a great gift of melody ; but their
songs are seldom heard now, with the excep
tion perhaps of 'The death of Tom Moody'
by Shield, and Storace's ' With lonely suit and
plaintive ditty.' Were it only for his song ' The
Bay of Biscay,' the name of John Davy of Ex
eter should be noted among the celebrities of this
period. John Braham, Charles Horn, and Henry
Bishop, were all born in the iSth century, but
go near its close that their works must be regarded
as products of the ipth. Braham was himself
a celebrated singer, and his national song, ' The
death of Nelson,' deserves to live. To Horn we
owe ' Cherry ripe,' and a song often sung by
Mme. Malibran, ' The deep, deep sea.' And Sir
Henry Bishop, who retained a firm hold on the
English public for fully half a century, must be
placed in the first rank of our composers of songs.
As a musician he surpassed all his contemporaries
and immediate predecessors in science, taste, and
facility; and perhaps also in invention. He cer
tainly advanced far beyond them with his ac
companiments, which are varied and skilful;
and his melodies are full of grace. So carefully
did he study correctness of accent, that in his
songs the metre of the poetry is seldom, if ever,
disturbed by the rhythm of the music — a rare
merit among English composers. Important, too,
and interesting are the introductions, interludes,
and conclusions of his songs, as for instance in
'Bid me discourse,' and ' Should he upbraid.' Of
'Home, sweet Home,' who has not felt the
charm ? Thomas Moore may be passed by here, for
his songs are noticed elsewhere in this Dictionary.1
In further illustration of the songs of the first part
of this century, the reader may be reminded of
' My boyhood's home ' and ' Under the tree,' by
Eooke; ' There's a light in her laughing eye,' by
Loder ; ' Love's Ritornella,' by Thomas Cooke ;
' They mourn me dead, in my father's halls ' and
'The banks of the blue Moselle/ by G. H. Rod-
well; 'Isle of beauty/ by Haynes Bayly and T. A.
Rawlings ; ' Meet me by moonlight alone ' and
'Love was once a little boy/ by Wade; 'Away to
the mountain's brow,' ' The Soldier's tear/ and
' Come dwell with me/ by Lee ;' I'd be a butterfly, '
by Haynes Bayly ; ' Phillis is my only joy,' by
J. W. Hobbs ; of ' The bluebells of Scotland/ by
Mrs. Jordan ; of ' Alice Grey/ by Mrs. Millard ;
and of 'The Cuckoo,' by Margaret Casson.2 These
songs, and innumerable others like them, follow,
as a rule, the simple plan of the Ballad proper.
1 See MOORE ; and IRISH Music.
2 The • Old English Gentleman,' published in 1832, and still pop-
tlar, Is a variation by C. H. Purday of a song or chant called ' The
Old Queen's Courtier,' first published in 1667.
SONG.
607
And as a general criticism upon them, it may be
said that being melodious and pleasant to sing is
their principal, if not their sole recommendation.
Written expressly to be sung, they have very
easy accompaniments ; and any good voice, even
with slight musical knowledge, can render them
effective in execution. When weighed, however,
in the balance of pure and scientific music, they
are felt to be worthless; and the popularity of
such pieces, even at the present time, is sugges
tive of some reflections on the standard of English
taste in relation to the Song.
While the taste of the English public in other
branches of music has of late years been remark
ably developed and elevated, there would seem to
have been no corresponding advance in respect of
the Song. At concerts where the instrumental
pieces given are all of the highest and most
classical type, the centre place of the programme
is very frequently assigned to some slight and
valueless song. The audience in no wise resent
its intrusion ; on the contrary, they greet it with
a rapturous applause, which would probably be
denied to a song of superior calibre. Encourage
ment, therefore, is wanting to the concert -singer
to extend his repertoire in the right direction.
But how comes it that audiences, whose ear is
severely fastidious to instrumental music, relax
and lower their standard of requirement for the
Song ? Whatever other reasons may be adduced
for this inequality of taste, it can at all events
be explained iu a large degree by the action of the
Italian Opera on the English vocal school. From
Handel's time until a very recent date, Italian
operas and Italian songs reigned supreme in
England ; Italian singers and Italian teachers
were masters of the situation to the exclusion of
all others. And the habit thus contracted of
hearing and admiring compositions in a foreign
and unknown tongue engendered in the English
public a lamentable indifference to the words of
songs, which reacted with evil effects both on the
composer and the singer. Concerned only to please
the ear of his audience, the composer neglected to
wed his music to words of true poetic merit ; and
the singer quickly grew to be careless in his
enunciation. Of how many English singers, and
even of good ones, may it not fairly be affirmed
that at the end of a song the audience has failed
to recognise its language ? But these singers have
been secured from the just penalties of such defec
tive enunciation by the habitual indifference of
English hearers to the intellectual meaning of
songs ; they have neither forfeited applause, nor
lost popularity. It is otherwise with nations ac
customed to the Opera and the Song in their ver
nacular tongue. Germans and Frenchmen, for
instance, expect to have the thought and senti
ment of a song conveyed to them by its words as
well as by its music. Naturally, therefore, they
reckon a clear and distinct pronunciation to be
among the first requisites of good singing ; and
there is no reason why the same quality should
not be demanded of singers in England. How
rarely in England is the name of the author of a
song stated in a programme as well as that of
603
SONG.
the composer ? In Germany, on the other hand,
the one is quite as prominently given as the other,
showing that the words are considered equally
important with the music — as indeed they are.
There is nothing in our language which makes it
unsuitable for singing, though undoubtedly some
difficulties in setting it to music arise out of the
irregular occurrence of the accents in our poetry.
But accentuation is a subject deserving of much
more study than it has yet received. Even some
of our best composers seem scarcely to have be
stowed a thought on the due correspondence of
the accents of the verse with the accents of the
music. German songs, on the other hand, are
seldom defective in this respect, except when they
have been translated into English, and then, of
course, the blame lies with the translator. Much
injustice has too often been done to fine German
and other foreign songs by the carelessness with
which the translation of them has been confided
to hasty or incompetent hands. Skilful trans
lation is by no means an easy art, and its
importance would seem to be better understood
in Germany and France than in England.
Adolphe Laun and Victor Wilder have shown
what high accomplishments may worthily be em
ployed in the art of translation for music ; but
how few are the English translators of whom the
same could be said !
Of living and very recent English song
writers, a large section still adhere to the ever-
popular ballad form. Regarding the voice-part
as the paramount consideration, they attempt
nothing more than the simplest harmonies and
accompaniments. And within these narrow
limits, by the force of natural gifts and instinc
tive taste, they have produced many songs of
great merit, whose popularity has often been a
sufficient reply to adverse criticism. Such were
Knight's ' She wore a wreath of roses,' and
' Rocked in the cradle of the deep ' ; Wallace's
'Bell-ringer'; Balfe's 'Come into the garden,
Maud,' and many another detached ballad ;
Madame Sainton Dolby's 'Sands of Dee';
Smart's ' Lady of the Lea ' and ' Estelle,' etc.,
etc. But the English ballad can be of much
lower grade than these, and is too often debased
by a vulgarity which, to say the least, is not
creditable to our national taste, though it is
often loudly applauded. Perfectly distinct from
these is another class of writers, whose aims are
higher, and who follow more closely the footsteps
of the German school. Pre-eminent among these
are Sterndale Bennett, in his two sets of six songs
(ops. 23 and 35) ; and, with the same correct
ness of form but more distinct English feeling,
Macfarren, especially in his lyrics from Shelley
and others; J. W. Davison ('Swifter far' and
other songs from Shelley); Hullah ('The Storm,'
« I arise,' ' The Three Fishers ') ; C. K. Salaman ;
and in particular Edward Bache, whose six songs
(op. 1 6) are among the most enduring relics of
his too short career.
Of genuine English songs — that is, purely Eng
lish in idiom or turn of expression — there has been
of late a considerable revival. Few songs have ever
SONG.
been more popular than those of Sullivan, and
few vary more widely in merit. His ' Orpheus '
and other Shakespeare songs, his set or cycle of
' The Window, or the Loves of the Wrens,' to Ten
nyson's words ; ' Sweet day so cool,' ' 0 fair dove,'
are truly delightful, melody and accompaniment
alike full of character, and with an unmistakeable
individuality. ' I wish to tune ' is a long scena,
full of good points, but hardly coming within the
category of the Song. Others are less carefully
studied, and, with all their extraordinary popu
larity, can hardly last, or add a permanent tribute
to the many merits of this composer. F. Clay
and Seymour Egerton have both written good
and graceful detached songs. Stanford's ' La
belle dame sans merci ' is powerful, and his
' Robin,' from Tennyson's ' Queen Mary,' though
slight, is full of quaint charm. Hubert Parry's
' Three odes of Anacreon,' ' Why doth azure deck
the sky,' ' The Poet's song,' ' 1 prithee give me
back my heart,' and many more, are of a high
degree of excellence and individuality.
But criticisms in detail of the compositions of
living or recent writers is always difficult and
full of risk. We stand too near them to appraise
their work without, at least, awakening suspi
cions of prejudice or partiality; and time maybe
trusted to discriminate the good from the bad with
substantial, if not infallible justice. To the tri
bunal of posterity we must leave Barnby, J. F.
Barnett, Bond-Andrews, Cowen, Davison, Dug-
gan, Elliot, Virginia Gabriel, Gledhill, Lawson,
Mounsey-Bartholomew, Marzials, Molloy, Scott-
Gattie, Stainer, Stirling, E. H. Thome, Maude
V. White, and many more.
The books from which the above information has been
taken have been referred to en passant in the notes.
SCANDINAVIA.
To this group belong Sweden, Norway, Den
mark, parts of Finland, Iceland, and the adjacent
islands. The Scandinavians have always been a
music-loving nation ; but it was not until recent
times that systematic collections of Swedish,
Norwegian and Danish Volkslieder were made.
In these collections the dates of the songs are
nearly impossible to define ; they may have been P
faithfully transmitted by ear from generation to
generation for hundreds of years past, or they
may have been invented by some gifted peasant >
of the present day. Very few were noted down
until the end of the last century.
The poetry of Scandinavia is peculiarly rich m
ballads, legends, and tales of the old heroes of the
middle ages, the heroic-epic element being abun
dant, while the lyrical one plays little part except
in the refrains to the ballads. The collectors of
the Volkslieder have found great difficulty m
noting down the music of these Kampewser,
owing to the free, declamatory way in which
they are sung. The formal melody only occurs
in the refrain or OmTcvdd. .
Little as we know of the ancient minstrelsy o
the Scalds, it is probable that the same analogy
that now exists between the heroic epics and tue
SONG.
old Edda legends also existed in the music, and
the same declamatory style prevailed.
As in all other national music, the musical
instruments of Scandinavia largely influenced
the songs. Thus in Finland the most popular
instrument is the Kantele with five strings, tuned
G, A, Bb, C, D, which forms the foundation for a
whole quantity of Runos.1
KS - wy kas -.ky tal - wa has - ta Kfi - wy kas - ky
— 1
fc
S ' —
— f
s
1
— * — •
•
— JH
-4
— It
— • —
-•
— f
... ,
— • j
• —
tal - wa has - ta Eal - ken luon-don Hal - di al - da
=&
Kal-ken luon-don Hal - di al - da.
The harp with which the Scald was wont
to accompany his lays has vanished; and the
Langleilce of Norway and Iceland, though shaped
like a harp, is really a bow instrument. The
Swedish Nyckelharpe is much the same. The
Hardangerfele (fele = fiddle), which is mostly used
in the Norwegian Highlands (near the Hardan-
gerfjord), is the most perfect of their instruments,
but is only used for marches and dances.2
The national dances have also greatly influenced
the melodies, though the Syvspring, Slangdanmr,
or Hailing, are not usually accompanied by sing
ing. On the other hand, in the Faroe Islands,
musical instruments are unknown, and as the
inhabitants are passionately fond of dancing,
they accompany it with singing, and chiefly,
strange to say, with the old epics and ballads.
The Faroe Islands (especially the southern part
of the group), Telemarken (in the S. W. of Nor
way), and the centre of Jutland, are the richest
districts of Scandinavia in national songs.3
Some of the epic songs collected in Telemarken
are evidently of great antiquity, as for instance
the following, relating to Sigurd's fight with the
dragon, with its curious rhythm and melancholy
original melody.
Slow.
Eg
no meg saa li-teneln gut, eg sjat-ta
or-min, ban mon-ne i
1 Stmo
IT-*"
gra - se skri - e For - dt
1 Stmo means 'air,' or 'ballad,' and has nothing to do with the
Anglo-Saxon or German runei, or runic writing stones. The singer
Is called by the Fins Eunoja or Eunolainen.
2 Marking the time by double tapping of the toe and heel Is un-
Werraptedly carried on by the peasant whilst playing all the while
Brilliantly on this instrument.
3 This district was called the Strickgegenct. or knitting-district,
because until quite recently the peasants used to meet of a winter's
evening in different homes, knitting woollen goods and relating or
singing tales, songs, ballads, and legends. Their wealth of songs was
'o great that in many places the same song was not allowed to be
*ung more than once a year. (See Dr. von Barn's article on Scan
dinavian Music, p. 557.)
VOL. III. PT.5.
SONG.
609
lig - ger or - min i
T - se - land u - ti
flo - 1.
The character of the songs of north-Sweden
and Norway, and especially of Denmark, is quite
different. In these the eight-bar rhythm is
usually well defined, with a refrain at the end,
as in the following example taken down by
Johann Lorentz in 1675.
De va, - re syv og syv - sind sty - -ve, dec
de drog ud Ira Hald,
og der de Kom-me ti
Brat - tings - borg, der sloge
•^ Omkvdd
de der - es tjald.
Det don - ner un-der ros, de don - ske hof-mond
-P — F-
der de ud - ri - - de.
Although lyrical songs are very rare in Scan
dinavia, there is a certain class of Kampevise,
or heroic, melodies found in parts of Sweden and
Denmark, softer, more melancholy, and more
romantic, and remarkable for having a refrain
both in the middle and at the end.
Och jung-frunhon skul-le slg at ot - te-san-gen
OmJtvdd
^^g^a^^gte^gEg
w I ^f I ! ^. ^_ I
Ti - den gOrs mig lang.—
N. fc:
gick hon den
OmJiv&d
I g^P=T~ S ,. I
• • •— Ui* J - -N-4
R •— •-
VS - gen at hO - ga ber-get lag.— Men jag vet att
d — h~~r~
P~
U"F — =i —
: — » J": N
—-••I
'
'
SOT - gen fir tung.
An important section of Scandinavian songs
are the herdsmen's. Their age is impossible to
state, but they all bear the same character.
The herdsman or maiden calls home the cattle
from the mountain side, either with the cow-
horn or Lur, or by singing a melody, with the
echo formed on the intervals of that instrument.
The following melody Dybeck gives amongst
many others in his Vallvisor, p. 12.
Kr
610
SONG.
E^^E5
rit, - - -
rail."
It may safely be asserted that 9 out of every
1 2 Scandinavian songs are in the minor. Many
begin in the major and end in the minor, or vice
versa. Others recall the old church scales, espe
cially the Mixolydian and Phrygian Modes ; for
instance, this Danish song which begins and ends
thus —
etc.
a
=3t
TT-* 1 1
-g-LJ— •
They are also more frequently in simple time
(usually 2-4) than any other.1 The affinity be
tween Danish songs and those of Wales, Scotland,
and even England, is very remarkable. Many
of the tunes are almost identical, and the words
often relate to the same subjects.
The so-called Scandinavian school of music is
of very recent birth, for until the close of the last
century it was greatly under foreign influences.
Thus during the i6th century the court-music of
Denmark was chiefly in the hands of Flemish
musicians ; whilst in the i yth, Dowland and many
other Englishmen, besides French, Polish, and
Italian musicians, visited the capital. The latter
part of the iyth and the first half of the iSth
were monopolised by the ballet, and French
melodies were heard to the exclusion of all
others. A fresh impulse was given to northern
music by the operas and Singspiele of German
composers, such as B. Keiser, J. A. P. Schulz,
and Kunzen. The imitations of these by Weyse
and Kuhlau, and Kuhlau's romantic play, ' Der
Elfenhiigel' (1828), were the first to introduce
the Scandinavian Volkslied on the stage. The
first compositions in which the vernacular was
used were the sacred and secular cantata.
But the chief impulse towards a national
Scandinavian school was given by the literature
of the country. Towards the end of the i8th
century the didactic school of poetry began to
give way to a fresher, more natural and lyrical
style, and by the beginning of the igth (in
fluenced perhaps by the 'Romanticism' of Ger
many), a great intellectual and national movement
i See Engel, 'National Music,' pp. 84. 174.
SONG.
began in Northern poetry. It was greatly pro-
moted in Denmark by Oehlenschlager ; and in
Sweden by the founding of the so-called Gotiska
forbimdet (or Gothic union). About this time
the first collections of Swedish and Danish
national songs appeared. Poets and musicians
became interested in the old epics and ballads
with their beautiful melodies and their wealth
of new materials, both in ideas and form, and
hastened to avail themselves of the treasure.
Thus, within the last hundred years a new school
of music has arisen, containing in its ranks the
distinguished names of Lindblad, Gade, Grieg,
Kjerulf, and others.
Sweden. The Song first received artistic treat
ment in Sweden in the latter decades of the last
century. Among the earliest song-writers is Carl
M. Bellman, the author of the celebrated Bell-
manslied.2 Olof Ahlstrom, Dupuy, and Crusell,
all wrote songs in the early part of this century,
but the first composers who drank in the romantic,
national spirit, and sang the beautiful cha
racteristic song-melodies of Sweden, were Nord-
blom, Blidberg, Arlberg, Arrhen von Kapfelmann,
Randel, Wennerberg, Josephson, Sb'dermann, T.
Sb'derberg, Runeberg, L. Norman, and above all
A. F. Lindblad. The songs of the latter com
poser have a widespread and well-merited fame,
for not only do they bear a strong national stamp,
but are also, apart from their nationality, really
beautiful and poetical compositions. Among the
most interesting are those to Atterbom's words,
especially ' Trohet ' ; 3 and others worthy of men
tion are ' Nara,' ' Brollopp-farden,' 'Saknad/ '0
kom, nej droj ' (one of Mendelssohn's especial
favourites), 'Am Aarensee,' 'En Vardag,' 'En
Sommardag.' Great service was also rendered
to the Song by the collections of Swedish Volks-
lieder made by Afzelius, Dybeck, Arwidsson, and
others.
Norway. The same service was rendered to Nor
wegian national airs by L. M. Lindeinann, who
also composed several sacred songs. Pre-eminent
among Scandinavian composers are the two Norwe-
gians, Kjerulf (1815-1868) and Grieg. Kjerulfs
exquisite lyrics are at last receiving their due
share of attention. Their long neglect is the
more strange when we examine his two books of
' Sanger och Visor,' lately published by Hirsch
(Stockholm). The beauty of such songs as 'Lok-
kende Toner ' ; ' Karlekspredikan ' ; ' Ved Sj oen den
morke,' op. 6, no. 2 ; 'Natten paa Fjorden,' op. 15,
no. 6 ; ' Mit Hjerte og min Lyre ' (My heart and
lute*), op. 16, no. 2; 'Serenade,' op. 16, no. 4;
'Saknaden,' op. 18, no. i; 'Eremiten,' op. 18,
no. 2, can hardly be overrated.
Grieg's lyrical songs are universally known;
2 Carl Michael Bellman, 1740-1795, was a very remarkable and
original lyrical genius. It is true that he was more of a poet)
a musician, for he himself wrote most of his wonderful 'Fred:
Epistlar' and ' Sanger' (among which the splendid humoro
pictures from the life of the people in Stockholm are especi
noticeable) ; but he set them chiefly to popular French melo
which were at that time greatly in vogue. His original melo
are inferior to those he borrowed from foreign sources.
3 On the death of the poet's wife, whose friend he was.
* Kjerulf seems to have had a special preference for English pc
many of his finest songs being set to the words of Moore, Byron, Burns,
end Mackay.
SONG.
not so however his Romanzen and Balladen,
which are of their kind among the finest that
have been written. (See especially op, 9 and 18,
to words by H. C. Andersen, Munch, Rickardt,
etc.) Numerous other songs with PF. accom
paniment have been written by 0. Winter-Hjelm,
K. Nordraak, Cappelen, J. Selmer, Frau Agathe
Grdndahl, Ole-Olsen, Teilraann, J.Svendsen, Neu-
pert, etc.
Denmark. It is curious that the three founders
of the Danish school of music — C. E. F. Weyse,
Friedrich Kuhlau, and Johann Hartmann should
have been Germans by birth. Hartmann is the
composer of one of the most celebrated national
songs of Denmark, ' Kong Christian stod ved
hojen mast,' l and also the founder of the Hart
mann family of composers. Weyse is considered
to be the creator of the Danish Romance. Full
of romantic feeling, and possessing a great gift of
melody, the songs from his Singspiele, and more
especially his ' Neun danische Lieder ' (set to
words by the national lyrists, Ewald, Oehlen-
schlager, Grundtvig, Heiberg, and Ch. Winther)
are justly popular. Contemporary native musi
cians were less celebrated, and Sorenson, Glaus
Schall, and Niels Schiorring, are names now
scarcely remembered. But the improvement of
literature by Oehlenschlager, Baggesen, and their
followers, Heiberg, Palludan-Miiller, Hans Chris
tian Andersen, Henrik Herzt, and others, soon
proved highly profitable to music. J. P. Emil
Hartmann (grandson of Joh. Hartmann) and
Niels Gade, are the great Danish romanticists.
This quality is less conspicuous in their songs
than in their larger works, but they did much
to develop both the voice and accompaniment
in their songs. In all Gade's numerous songs
there is the same northern colouring, but more
subdued than in J. P. Emil Hartmann's. His
songs are more gloomy, and their form is less
perfect than Gade's. Hartmann's best songs are
the set of nine under tbe title of ' Salomon and
Sulaniith,'and the six to Winther'spoem 'Hjortens
Flugt.' Another composer who would belong to
this group is P. Heise. L. Zinck, Krossing, R.
Bay, A. G. Berggreen, H. Rung, Gebauer, J. 0.
E. Hornemann, have treated the Song in a simpler
and more popular form ; and among the younger
generation of song-writers may be named, Glaser,
Barnekow, Winding, J. and 0. Mailing, E. Hart
mann, Steenberg, Rosenfeld, Bechgaard, Lange-
Miiller, F. Rung, Liebmann, and C. F. E. Hor
nemann.
The principal work on which the above sketch
is based is Dr. von Ravn's article on 'Skan-
(h'navische Musik' in the supplement to Mendel's
Lexicon (1882).
The best collections of national airs are :
'Nordische Volkslieder,' edited by Leopold Kocke.
Swedish :—
'100 Svenska Folkvisor ' ; Lundguist, Stockholm.
'Svenska Folkvisor,' edited by E. G. Geijer and A. A.
Afzelius; Haeagstrom, Stockholm.
'Svenska Voll visor och Hornlatar ' (med Norska Art-
fai-andringar), edited by Richard Dybeck.
1 'King Christian stood by the lofty mast.' This song, with an ex
celled translation, is to be found in Boosey's Kojal Song Books
(Scandinavia;.
SONG.
611
Norwegian :—
2 volumes of National Songs, edited by Lindemann ;
Warmuth, Christiania.
Danish : —
' Danske Folke sange og Melodier,' edited by A. P. Berg-
green ; Copenhagen.
' Danske Melodier,' published by B. Hansen ; Copen
hagen.
HUNGARY.
The songs of Hungary comprise those both of
the Slovaks and of the Magyars. But the music
of the Slovaks, who inhabit the N.W. part of the
kingdom, so closely resembles that of the Sla
vonic nations as not to require separate notice.
[See SLAVONIC songs, p. 612.] The music of the
Magyars — generally accepted as the national
music of Hungary — is, as already remarked (vol.
ii. p. 197) very largely influenced by the Gipsies,
who give it its strong oriental colouring. The
stamp of their race is however more distinctly
perceptible in dances and instrumental music
than in songs.
As in other countries, so in Magyar-land, the
introduction of Christianity was followed by a
burst of hymn-poetry. But so strong was the
national spirit, that not only were the hymns
sung, even in the churches, in the vernacular, and
not in Latin, but the ecclesiastical tonal system
never took the same strong hold of the sacred
music that it did elsewhere, and it has under
gone but little change since those early times.
A few of these venerable hymns are still sung.
Such are one to the Virgin by Andreas Va'sa'rheli
(printed at Nuremberg 1484), and another to
King Stephen, the patron saint of Hungary.
Here as elsewhere the influence of the Reforma
tion was deeply felt both in music and poetry ;
and a large development of the national songs
was the result, especially on their lyric side.
Dramatic representations, interspersed with songs,
were introduced by wandering minstrels and
harp or cither players : and the last of these
performers was the celebrated Tinddi ('Sebastian
the Lutenist') who died in the i6th century.
The excitable temperament and sensitive or
ganization of the Hungarian render him keenly
susceptible to the refinements of melody and
rhythm, and give him his wealth of national
poetry and songs. But the very exclusiveness
with which he loves his own music has, by ex
cluding foreign influence, been a hindrance to
its progress, and has condemned it to a long stag
nation in the immature stage of mere national
music. The list of Hungarian composers, from
Slatkonia (born 1456), bishop and court chapel-
master to Maximilian I, does not present a
single celebrated name, until we come to our
own contemporaries, Liszt, Joachim, Vagvolgyi,
etc. Bela M. Vagvolgyi requires notice here on
account of his original and very popular songs
entitled ' Szerelmi dalok,' and his collection and
arrangement of national airs under the name of
'Ne'pdalgyongyb'k.' It must, nevertheless, be
admitted that the Hungarians can fairly plead
the unsurpassed beauty of their national melodies
as an excuse for their exclusive devotion. All
their music has a strongly individual character.
Rr2
612
SONG.
SONG.
Peculiarities both melodic and rhythmic give
it the charm of distinctive originality. And
its abrupt transitions from deep melancholy to
wild merriment, with the unexpected modula
tions which accompany them, never fail to pro
duce an exquisite effect.
Hungarian songs are commonly sung in unison,
and a semblance of harmony is imparted to them
by the lavish embellishments of the accompany
ing instruments [see vol. ii. p. 198]. These
embellishments are pure improvisations, played
with extreme rapidity and freedom, and the
greatest precision. The intervals are said to be
or even tones. The scale —
m
with the augmented intervals, offers no difficulties
to instrumental music ; but is much less favour
able to vocal harmony. The Hungarian method
of harmonising is, indeed, always peculiar. Thus,
where the Germans employ ' contrary motion '
they prefer ' direct' — and with very good results.
But the most remarkable feature both of the
poetry and the music of the Hungarians is its
rhythm. At an early date their lyric poetry
shaped itself into sharp and bold strophical
sections, and their melodies underwent a cor
responding division into distinct phrases and
periods. But within these limits there is ample
freedom. Great diversity of accents, and the
unequal lengths of the lines, give richness and
variety to the musical rhythm. Syncopation, and
the shortening of the first note of the bar (like
the Scotch snap), are common —
and the periods consist of three and four bars —
generally of three, as in ' Golden is my steed,'
* The bold Hussar,' or • The Fisherman ' (all well-
known national airs). Occasionally the periods
run in five-bar phrases, as in a very beautiful
popular song called ' Autumn.' And as this song
further illustrates the sudden changes and the
harmonic and rhythmic peculiarities already
referred to, it will be convenient to insert it at
length :— *
Con espretsione.
f piii mosso.
a tempo, dolendo.
cres. ed accel. poco A
:*=
i-
m=£
P a tempo.
tezfc
qfffttuoso.
i Arranged ty Dr. Pressel, whose account of Hungarian Music, In
the Neue Zeitschrift fur Musik, vol. xxxvi, Is both accurate and
interesting. It is included iu Boosey's Koyal Song Books. (See p. 80
of Songs of Eastern Europe.)
P a tempo.
35
+^-1
*
W
C5^3t
The time of Hungarian national airs is mostly
2-4. Compound time is rare, excepting 5-4 or
5-8, which is more common than in many other
countries. In any collection of Hungarian songs
numerous examples may be found. Instances of
7-8 time are also not unknown, but where these
eccentricities occur, they are probably due to the
great freedom of the poetic metre.
Many collections of the national songs of Hungary
have been published at Pesth and Vienna. The best are
those edited by Gabriel Matray, by Vagvolgyi, and a
smaller collection published by Pressel at Stuttgart,
also by Boosey, London ; edited by J. A. Kappey.
For further information see—
'Ungarische Volkslieder ' ; tibersetzt und eingeleitet
von M. A. Greguss.
4 National Songs of the Slovaks in Hungary,' by Kollar.
' Die Zigeuner und ihre Musik in Ungarn,' by Franz
Liazt.
Notices in the ' Neue Zeitschrift ftlr Musik ' vol. xxxvi ;
in the Caecilia, vol. v, and in the article on MAGYAR
MUSIC in this Dictionary.
RUSSIA AND THE SLAVONIC NATIONS.
Russia. From the cradle to the grave Song is
the constant companion of the Russian's life.
It is the delight of both sexes and of every age.
The sports of childhood, the pleasures of youth,
and all the varied occupations of mature years,
have each their own appropriate accompaniment
of song. The Khorovod, for instance, is a choral
dance with which the boys and girls of the
Russian villages greet the approach of spring.
The Kolyadki, or Christmas songs, belong to a
large group of ritual and mythic songs which
mark successive stages of the year, and are
sung respectively, at seed-time and harvest, mid
summer and midwinter, the New Year and
Whitsuntide. Another group of ceremonial
songs belongs to betrothals and marriages,
christenings and funerals, and embodies the feel
ings awakened by the principal incidents of life.
And to sorrow, whatever its source, the Zap-
ladiki, or wailing songs, bring relief. An epic
element is supplied by songs which record his
toric events, or celebrate the exploits of soldiers,
Cossack heroes, or noted robbers. Such are the
long metrical romances, called Bylinas, sung or
recited by village minstrels. And the love of
the Russian peasant for his national airs is fully
shared by his more educated countrymen, among
whom the national operas of Verstovsky, Glinka,
and other composers have a wide and lasting
popularity. "!
Russian songs have, as a rule, a distinctively
local character. In Great Russia, for example,
their dominant qualities are gaiety and bright
ness ; while the superior charm of the songs of
Little Russia is due, for the most part, to a
prevailing cast of melancholy. Inhabited by a
people who vie with the Poles in susceptibility
to poetic sentiment, Little Russia is naturally
rich in songs. And we may note as peculiarities
of these pieces, which have often a touching
beauty, the presence of certain discords in the
harmony, and a halt or drag in the rhythm,
SONG.
SONG.
613
•produced by shortening the first syllable and
prolonging the second, thus : —
3^~9
"A 25
m —
' i""1
^ 1
fe^
etc.
Indigenous to the Ukraine, and met with no
where else, is a kind of epic song of irregular
rhythm, recited to a slow monotonous chant.
These Doumas (as they are called) were origin
ally improvised by the Bandurists, but that class
of wandering minstrels is now nearly extinct,
and their function has devolved upon the native
women who compose both the poetry and the
melodies of the songs which they sing them-
eelves. Among the peculiarities of these inter
esting songs we may mention that if a song of the
Ukraine ends on the dominant or lower octave,
the last note of the closing verse is sung very
goftly, and then without a break the new verse
begins loud and accented, the only division
between the two being such a shake as is de
scribed by the German phrase Bocktriller. Here
is an example : —
Wendic folk-song.
This feature is common also to Cossack songs,
and to the songs of that Wendic branch of the
Slavonic race which is found in a part of Saxony.
The Wendic songs (except when dance-tunes)
are generally sung tremolando, and very slowly.
And the exclamation ' Ha ' or ' Hale,' with
which they almost invariably commence, may
be compared with the ' Hoj ' or ' Ha ' of Little
Russia, the 'ach' of Great Russia, and the
meaningless ' und ' and ' aber ' which are inter
spersed through German Volkslieder. To Lithu
ania belong the Dainos ; and monotonous as
they are, they are not without a certain grace,
when sung by the people of their native dis
tricts. Servia, too, has her own characteristic
songs, which often end on the supertonic, as for
instance in the case of the Servian Hymn : —
This mode of ending may also be sometimes
found in the songs of Bosnia and Dalmatia.
The folk-songs of Russia are always metrical,
and the metre is wont to be very free and
elastic. But, unlike modern Russian poetry,
which imitates German poetry, and is written in
four-line stanzas and rhyme, the genuine folk
songs of Russia are never rhymed, and rarely
fcung with instrumental accompaniment. If, how
ever, there be an accompaniment, the instruments
most commonly used are the Gudok, a three-
Btringed fiddle ; or the Dudka, a reed instrument
of two small parallel pipes ; or the Gusla, which
resembles a cymbal. Being, therefore, written
in a vocal rather than an instrumental style, the
songs of Russia want brilliancy and variety of
rhythm, but what they lose in these qualities
ihey gain in tenderness and expression. A large
proportion of Russian and other Slavonic songs are
of Gipsy origin, and are usually in dance rhythm,
the dancers marking the time by the stamp of
their feet. In short, if we roughly divide the
longs of Russia they will fall into two groups : —
(1) songs of a quick lively tempo, commonly
sung to dances, in major keys, and in unison ;
(2) songs sung very slow, in harmony, and in
minor keys. Of the two the latter are the best
and most popular. It will not escape notice that
florid passages on one syllable * often occur in
Russian songs, as in the 'Cossack of the Don' : —
wem
- nend da.
nor that some of the oldest Slavonic melodies
are based on the ecclesiastical scales, more espe
cially those of Poland and Bohemia, whose music
bears the impress of contact with Germany.
The former feature has been well perpetuated by
Rubinstein in his beautiful songs 'Gelb rollt' —
- ne tneia Herz und
and 'Die helle Sonne leuchtet' —
die
etc.
a!
le
etc.
glflhn und zit - - tern
The later composers of Russia, such as Glinka,
Lvoff, Verstovsky, Dargomijsky, Kozlovsky, and
others, have been true to the national spirit in
their songs. So faithfully have the old national
songs been imitated by them, that it is hard to
distinguish the new from the old productions,
and indeed some modern songs — for instance,
Varlamof's 'Red Sarafan,' and Alabief's 'The
Nightingale' — have been accepted as national
melodies. Other composers, such as Gurilef,
Vassilef, and Dubuque, have set a number of
national airs, especially the so-called Gipsy tunes,
to modern Russian words in rhyme and four-line
stanzas, and have arranged them with PF. ac
companiment. Even the greatest Russian com
posers, the style of whose other works is cosmo
politan, adhere to national peculiarities in their
songs. The florid passages on one syllable,
already noticed, are often met with in the songs
of Rubinstein; and Tschaikofsky frequently re
produces the characteristic harsh harmony of the
1 Bach has a long and not dissimilar passage on the word ' we:nete.'
a propos to Peter's weeping, in bis Passion Music of S. Matthew and
b. John.
614
SONG.
old folk-songs. These two composers' German
Lieder are of such beauty as to have found
favour with every nation devoted to music. But
this distinction is not the exclusive honour of
Rubinstein and Tscha'ikofsky ; it is the due also of
their countrymen, Borodin, Napravnik,Genischta,
Serof, Davidof, and Dargomijsky. Others again,
whose popularity is confined to Russia, have
chosen to follow Italian models in their vocal
compositions : and in this class Varlamof, Gurilef,
Alabief, Vassilef, Bulachof, Paufler, and Derfeldt
are all prolific writers. Flowing melodies, simple
accompaniments, and an absence of striking
modulations are characteristics of their songs.
Lvof, Bortniansky, Bachmetief, and Dmitrief,
true Russians, are chiefly known for their sacred
music.
Poland. The songs of the Poles, also a
Slavonic people, differ widely from those of
Russia in rhythm and variety of metre. There
is more fire and passion about them than about
Russian songs, the Poles being more excitable and
more keenly susceptible to romance than their
neighbours. Polish songs have an instrumental
rather than a vocal colouring, which reveals itself
in their difficult intervals (such as the augmented
fourth), syncopated notes, and intricate rhythms.
Thus :—
=
Ej ej sla zy dow ka ej ej wedle etc.
Vivace
k ci ja c!i!o-pt-k da i nie
etc.
In this they resemble the Hungarian music. The
elasticity of their poetic metre is productive of
great irregularity of melodic phrases, showing
itself in constant deviation from the four-bar
sections, in 7-8 time, and alternate bars of 3-8
and 2-8 ; thus —
1
".„
s
— »*a— — ««s—
Ja-sio ko-nie pu il lia-ria chu-sty pra - la
i]
na-m<J-wi - ko - i - ja je by we dro wa - la
etc.
The rare beauty of Polish songs is not due to
fertility of melodic invention. The Poles indeed
are rather poor in this quality, but the deficiency
is hidden by the wonderful skill with which they
vary and embellish their songs. The rhythm is
always peculiar and striking, as for instance
that of their famous national dances, the Polonez
and Mazurek (Polonaise and Mazurka), which
are constantly heard in their songs.
Of modern Polish songs, Chopin's are the best
known and the most beautiful, but the purest
national characteristics will also be found in the
songs of Moniuszko.
Bohemia. The music of Bohemia has never
attracted and influenced foreign composers, as
SONG.
that of Hungary has done ; but its artistic value,
especially in its songs, has of late been fully
recognised. Bohemian songs may be divided into
two classes. The first, and much the oldest, have
a bold decisive character, with strongly marked
rhythm, and are in the minor. The second class
— in tunefulness and tenderness superior to the
former — are in the major, and of a simple rhythm.
In many of the early songs we find a chorale, as
in the middle of the celebrated and beautiful
'War Song of the Hussites,' which dates from
about 1460. The more recent songs of Bohemia
have a flowing, clear, and distinct cantiUne,
sometimes recalling Italian songs. Then: rhythm
is varied, but never exaggerated; and a vein
of natural unaffected humour runs through
them. Their harmony has been affected by
the Dudelsack or bagpipe, a favourite national
instrument.
Bohemia is preeminently rich in dances (such
as the beseda, dudik, fttriant, hulan, polka, tri-
nozlca, sedlak, etc.), which take their names from
places, or from the occasions on which they are
danced, or from the songs with which they are
accompanied. There are numerous collections
of Bohemian national songs ; and of late years
native composers, both vocal and instrumental,
have brought them into public notice. They
have been sung at concerts by Strakaty, Pischek,
and Luker; while Simak, Sme'tana, Dvorak,
and others, have arranged both songs and dances
for the orchestra and piano. Among modern
Bohemian composers Tomaschek (born 1774)
was one of the first to introduce the national
element into his works. Knize followed him,
and his ballad ' Bretjslav a Jitka ' became very
popular. Krov and Skroup were also authors of
many national and patriotic songs, and Skroup's
' Kde domov muj ' (or ' Where is my home ') may
be cited as a characteristic example of their com
positions. Skroup and the poet Chmelensky have
edited a well-known collection, under the title
of ' VSnec ' (the Garland), containing songs by
33 Bohemian composers. Among them are
Ruziaka, Drechsler, Vasik, Skfivan, Tomaschek,
and Rosenkranz, the author of the popular song
'Vystavim se skromnow chaloupka' ('Let us
build a modest hut'). And to later editions of
the ' V2nec,' issued by other editors, were added
songs by Sucha"nek, Stasny, Veit, and Gyrowetz.
In 1844 the Moravian composer Ludwig Bitter
von Dietrich published a volume of 'Bohemian
Songs/ including his well-known and patriotic
air 'Morava, Moravicka milaV And Kosek,
Kava"n, Pivoda, Zvonaf, Bendl, Napravnik^Ze-
lensky, Krov, Skroup, Zahorsky, Kozkosny,
Lahorsky, and Dvorak are all worthy of mention
as national composers, whose songs have remained
local in their colouring, notwithstanding the
dominant influence of Germany.
For further information respecting Slavonic national
songs the reader may be referred to Veselovsky's worn
on 'Slavonic Songs'; Yussupof 's 'History of Music m
.Russia'; Kalston's 'Songs of the Kussian people^
Chodzko's 'Historic Songs of the Ukrainians, etc.(;
Haupt and Schmaler's 'Wendic Folk-Songs'; Talvia
'History of Kussian Literature.'
SONG.
SONG.
615
GERMANY.
The history of the Song in Germany has been
so thoroughly explored by German writers, that
its course may be followed from very remote
times, when song was scarcely distinguishable
from speech, and singen and sagen were convert
ible terms. But the musician is not concerned
with the Song until it has acquired a certain form
in metre and melody. The ' Minnesinger ' must,
therefore, be our starting-point.1
The ' Minnesinger ' were the German counter
parts of the Troubadours, but they were of rather
later date than the Proven9al minstrels, and the
tone of their compositions was somewhat dif
ferent. While the Troubadours sang almost ex
clusively of love and gallantry, the Minnesinger
constantly introduced into their songs praises of
the varied beauties of nature. And the expres
sions of homage to the Virgin, or of other devo
tional feeling, which burst so frequently from
their lips, were the outcome of a deeper religious
sentiment than any to which the light-hearted
Proven9als were ever subject. In social rank
the Minnesinger were not as a body quite on
a level with the Troubadours ; there was a larger
proportion among them of men whose birth and
station were beneath nobility. Nevertheless
their art was highly esteemed, and wherever they
went they were honoured guests. They always
sang and accompanied their own compositions,
and took no remuneration for the entertainment
which they gave. They were more numerous in
Southern than in Northern Germany; Austria
was especially prolific of them.
The era of the Minnesinger may be roughly
divided into three epochs. The first was a period
of growth and development, and ended some
where about 1190. Its songs were of a popular
cast, and its most representative names were von
Kiirenberc, Dietmar von Aiste, and Meinloh von
Sevelingen. The second and best period, which
was the stage of maturity, was covered by the
last years of the I2th century and at least half
of the 1 3th century. To this period belonged
Heinrich von Veldecke, Friedrich von Hausen,
Heinrich von Morungen, Reinmar der Alte (the
master of Walther von der Vogelweide), Hart-
mann von Aue (the author of the celebrated poem
'Das avme Heinrich'), and Walther von der
Vogelweide himself, whose fine lyrics won for
him a place among national poets. Early in the
1 3th century the ' Sangerkrieg,' or Minstrel-con
test, was held on the Wartburg by the Landgrave
Hermann of Thuringia, and among the champions
who took part in it were Heinrich von Ofterdin-
gen, Tannhauser, and Wolfram von Eschenbach.
Wolfram's Minnelieder had no great success, but
1 If it were possible, It would be convenient to trace the rise and
decline of particular kinds of songs in separate and clearly defined
sections of time ; but this is altogether impossible, because their
respective periods are interlaced with one another. Thus, the
volkslhumlichct Lied had come into existence while the Ode and the
Aria were at their zenith ; and, again, composers were using the Aria
form even after the introduction of the lyric song.— Another obser
vation should be made here. Some German musical terms have no
exact English equivalents : attempts to translate them would simply
mislead. They are, therefore, used in the text, but the reader will
find explanations of their meaning.
high renown was gained for him by his Wachter-
lieder and his ' Parsifal.' The third period was
a time of decline, and of transition to the ' Meis-
tersinger.' The art of the Minnesinger then
descended to trivial or unpoetic themes, and a
growing carelessness as to the forms of poetry
plainly revealed its deterioration. Nithart v.
Reuenthal (whose poems were chiefly descrip
tions of peasant-life), Ulrich v. Lichtenstein,
Reinmar v. Zwefcer, der Marner, and Konrad v.
Wiirzburg were the principal Minnesinger of this
period.
Medieval MSS. contain a large number of the
poems and melodies of the Minnesinger,2 and
these remains attest the incomparable superiority
of their poetry to their music. They bestowed
especial pains on the poetic words, and treated
the melody as a mere accessory. So finished
were their verses as regards metre and rhythm,
that in some cases even the music of the pre
sent day could hardly support them with an
adequate setting. But this perfection was of
course only reached by degrees. Beginning with
alliterative words, they advanced to regular
rhymes, and then rules of composition were laid
down prescribing the number of lines of which
different kinds of songs (such as the Lied and
the Leich) should respectively consist.
The structure of the verses was closely fol
lowed by the Minnesinger's melodies, and as
there was necessarily a pause wherever the
rhyme fell, a certain form was thus imparted to
them. Their mode of notation was similar to
that then used in the Church, and their melo
dies were founded on the Church scales ; and
they exhibited the same monotony and absence
of rhythm as the ecclesiastical melodies of that
time. The following example will show how un
like their melodies were to the concise and clear
rhythmical chansons of the Troubadours : — 3
3E
jg^jg-r--^- T -P- -&-
f i -^—- • ' -i—3
-^—
m
Daz
er -*ste Syn - gen hie
no
tut
Heyu - rich von Of - ter - din - gen
W==^:
des
e - deln vur - - sten
dhon.
In the I4th century feudalism had passed its
prime, and power was slipping from the grasp
of princes, prelates, and nobles into the hands
of burghers and artisans. Out of these middle
classes came the ' Meistersinger,' who supplanted
the more patrician Minnesinger, while the ' Min-
negesang ' was succeeded by the ' Meistersang ' of
2 Fr. Heinrich v. d. Hagen's work on the ' Minnesinger ' is the best
authority to consult. The reader will find in its fourth volume a
very instructive essay on the music of the Minnesinger, together with
many examples of their melodies, some of which are transcribed in
facsimile, while others are given in modern notation.
3 P'rom the Jena MSS. Hagen gives this example in its original
notation (iv. S43. No. xxix).
616
SONG.
the burghers.1 Poetry lost in grace and ten
derness by the change, but it gained in strength
and moral elevation. The reputed founder of
the Meistersinger was Heinrich von Meissen,
commonly called Frauenlob. He came to Mainz
in 1311, and instituted a guild or company of
singers who bound themselves to observe certain
rules. Though often stiff and pedantic, Frau-
enlob's poems evince intelligence and thought;2
and the example set by him was widely imitated.
Guilds of singers soon sprang up in other large
towns of Germany ; and it became the habit of
the burghers, especially in the long winter even
ings, to meet together and read or sing narrative
or other poems, either borrowed from the Minne
singer, and adapted to the rules of their own
guild, or original compositions of their own. By
the end of the I4th century there were regular
schools of music at Colmar, Frankfurt, Mainz,
Prague, and Strassburg. A little later they were
found also in Nuremberg, Augsburg, Breslau,
Regensburg, and Ulm. In shore, during the
1 5th and i6th centuries there was scarcely a
town of any magnitude or importance throughout
Germany which had not its own Meistersinger.
The 1 7th century was a period of decline both in
numbers and repute. The last of these schools
of music lingered at Ulm till 1839, and then
ceased to exist ; and the last survivor of the
Meistersinger is said to have died in 1876.
Famous among Meistersinger were Hans Rosen-
blu't, Till Eulenspiegel, Muscatbliit, Heinrich von
Miigeln, Puschmann, Fiscbart, and Seb. Brandt ;
but the greatest of all by far was Hans Sachs,
the cobbler of Nuremberg, who lived from 1494
to 1576. Under him the Nuremberg scbool
reached a higher point of excellence than was
ever attained by any other similar school. His
extant works are 6048 in number, and fill 34
folio volumes. 4275 of them are Meisterlieder,
or ' Bar,' as they are called.3 To Sachs's pupil,
Adam Puschmann, we are indebted for accounts
of tbe Meistergesang. They bear the titles of
'Griindlicher Bericht des deutschen Meisterge-
eanges' (Gorlitz 1573) ; and ' Grundlicher Bericht
<ler deutschen Reimen oder Rhythmen ' (Frank
furt a. 0. 1596).*
The works of the Meistersinger had generally
a sacred subject, and their tone was religious.
Hymns were their lyrics, and narrative poems
founded on Scripture were their epics. Some
times, however, they wrote didactic or epigram
matic poems. But their productions were all
alike wanting in grace and sensibility ; and by
1 The origin of the term ' Meistersintjer' Is uncertain. Ambros
says that it was appli-d to every Minnesinger who was not a noble,
and thus became the distinguishing appellation of the burgher
minstrels. Beissmanu, however, maintains that the title Meister in
dicated excellence in any act or trade ; and that having been at first
conferred only on the best singers, it was afterwards extended to all
members of the guilds.
2 A complete collection of Frauenlob's poems was published In
1843 by Ettmiiller at Quedlinburg.
a The celebrated chorale ' Warum betrflbst du dich, meln Herz '
was long believed to be the work of Hans Sachs ; but it has been
conclusively shown by BChme in his ' Altdeutsches Liederbuch,'
p. 748, that the words were written by Georgius Aemilius Oemler,
and then set to the old secular melody ' Dein gsund mein freud.'
* Both are partially reprinted in Biisching's 'Sammlung JOr alt-
deutsche Literatur.'
SONG.
a too rigid observance of their own minute and
complicated rules of composition or ' Tablatur '
(as they were termed), the Meistersinger con
stantly displayed a ridiculous pedantry.
Churches were their ordinary place of practice.
At Nuremberg, for instance, their singing school
was held in S. Katherine's church, and their
public contests took place there. The proceed
ings commenced with the ' Freisingen,' in which
any one, whether a member of the school or not,
might sing whatever he chose; but no judgments
were passed on these preliminary performances.
After them came the real business of the day —
the contest — in which Meistersinger alone might
compete. They were limited to scriptural sub
jects, and their relative merits were adjudged by
four ' Merker' or markers, who sat, behind a
curtain, at a table near the altar. It was the
duty of one of the four to see that the song faith
fully adhered to scripture ; of another to pay
special attention to its prosody ; of a third to
its rhyme ; and of the fourth to its melody.
Each carefully noted and marked the faults
made in his own province ; and the competitor
who had the fewest faults obtained the prize,
a chain with coins. One of the coins, bearing
the image of King David, had been the gift of
Hans Sachs, and hence the whole 'Gesange'
were called the ' David,' and the prizemen were
called the ' Davidwinner.' The second prize was a
wreath of artificial flowers. Every Davidwinner
might take pupils, but no charge was made for
teaching. The term 'Meister,' strictly speak
ing, applied only to those who invented a new
metre, or composed their own melodies ; the rest
were simple 'Sanger.' The instruments em
ployed for accompaniments were the harp, the
violin, and the cither.
The Meistersinger seem to have possessed a
store of melodies for their own use : and these
melodies were labelled, as it were, with distinc
tive though apparently unmeaning names, such
as the blue-tone, the red-tone, the ape-tune,
the rosemary-tune, the yellow-lily-tune, etc. A
Meistersinger might set his poems to any of
these melodies. The four principal were called
the 'gekrontenTone,' and their respective authors
were Miiglin, Frauenlob, Marner, and Kegen-
bogen. So far were the Meistersinger carried by
their grotesque pedantry, that in setting the
words of the 29th chapter of Genesis to Heinrich
Muglin's 'lange Ton,' the very name of the
book and the number of the chapter were in
cluded ;5 thus —
^
Ge - ne - sis am neun und zwan-zig-sten uns be-richt,
-^ I 1 1 : 1 1 i-: "•= —
wie Ja-cob floh yor sein Bru-der E - sau ent-wlcbt.
^
Das er in Me - so - po - ta - mi - am kom - men
» A similar thing occurs in the 'Lamentations' of tbe Boman
Church, which begin 'Incipit Lamentatio Jeremiffl prophets, Alepo.
SONG.
SONG.
617
Die - ses Or - tes Ge - le - gen-heit, ob ih -
f
'
?=r
nen
Na - hors Sohn, La- ban, be - kennt - llch?
FH»
Und sie be - kr&ff - tig - ten diss
Trieb Ih - re
etc.
And many an instance may be found in their
secular music where the melody includes the
name of the poet and the page of the work.
The melodies of the Meistersinger (like those
of the Minnesinger) had a close affinity to
church music, or rather to the Gregorian Modes.
For the most part they were poor and simple,
and too devoid of rhythm ever to become really
popular. A few however of their songs found
sufficient favour to become Volkslieder in the
ijth and i6th centuries.1 On the other hand, the
Meistersinger themselves sometimes appropriated
Volkslieder. Thus Hans Sachs has reproduced
the beautiful old Mailied (May-song) in his
Fastnachtsspiel ' Der Neydhart mit dem Feyhel,'
written Feb. 7, I562.2 He calls it a 'Reigen,'
or roundelay, and its original date was evidently
anterior to the I4th century. In its i6th
century form it commences as follows : —
A
u
_T
0« 1
yf P ( * 1
^ F
P2__p " p .
i •
vH/ •
1 .. f
) . i 1
Der
Mey - e, der Hey - e bringt mis der
0 1
)
— tsF — *«^ t — —
^t
Blum - lein vil, ich trug etc.
In fine, the Meistersinger cannot be said to
have reached a high level of excellence either in
poetry or in music, but they undoubtedly exer
cised an important influence on the formation
of the Song by the attention they paid to rhyme,
and by their numerous inventions of new metri
cal arrangements. And they rendered a still
greater service to music when they carried it
into every German home and made it a grace
and pastime of domestic life.
While more regular and formal varieties of
the Song were thus being studied and practised,
it had never ceased to issue in its old spontane
ous form of Volkslied from the untutored hearts
of a music-loving people. From that source it
came in native vigour, unforced and untrammelled.
And far more was done for melody and harmony
by the obscure authors of Volkslieder than was
ever done by Minnesinger or Meistersinger. As
Ambros has justly pointed out, the importance
» According to BOhme. In the Preface to his ' Altd. Liederbuch,
p. xxiii, the writers of the Volkslieder never signed their names
while the Meistersinger generally introduced his own name, and very
often the date of his composition, into the last rhyme of the poem.
A Meistersinger's song can thus be distinguished from a true Volks
lied. z See BOhme'S ' Altd. Liederbuch/ p. 366.
of the part played by the Volkslied in the
history of the music of Western Europe, was
second only to that of the Gregorian Modes.
From the Volkslieder, the greatest masters bor
rowed melodies ; and not only did they inge
niously arrange them as polyphonic songs in
secular music, but they also made them the
foundations of their greatest and most ambitious
works ; and it is notorious that whole masses
and motets were often formed on a Volkslied.3
Whoever were the authors of the Volkslieder,
it was not their habit to write them down : the
songs lived on the lips of the people. But
happily, even in remote times, there were col
lectors who made it their business to transcribe
these popular songs; and of collections thus made
none are more important than the 'Limburg
Chronicle' and the 'Locheimer Liederbuch.'
The former work consists of Volkslieder which
would seem to have been in vogue from 1347
to 1 380 ; while songs of apparently little later
date are found in the other collection, which is
dated 1452.* The ' Lehrcompendium ' of H. de
Zeelandia also contains some very fine Volks
lieder of the first half of the 15th century.
'Her Conrad ging' is given by Ambros as an
example of them, both in its original and modern
notation.5 The subjects of the early Volks
lieder were historical, they were indeed epic
poems of many stanzas set to a short melody.6
But by the time that the Volkslied had attained
its meridian splendour, about the beginning
of the 1 6th century, almost every sentiment of
the human heart and every occupation of life
had its own songs. Students, soldiers, pedlars,
apprentices, and other classes, all had their own
distinctive songs. The conciseness and pleasant
forms of the melody in the Volkslieder were the
secret of their universal charm. The music was
always better than the words. So loose was tbe
structure of the verse, that syllables without any
sense whatever were often inserted to fill up the
length of the musical phrase, as in
Dort oben auf dem Berge—
D61pel, d61pel, dfilpel—
Da steht ein hohes Haus,
or a sentence was broken off in the middle, or
meaningless unds and abers were lavishly in
terspersed. But notwithstanding these laxities
of composition, there was a close connection
between the words and the melody.
The Volkslied was always in a strophical
form, and therein differed from the Sequences
[see SEQUENCE] and Proses of the Church, and
from the Leichen of the Minnesinger, which had
different melodies for each strophe. Another
marked feature of the Volkslied was its rhyme.
When the final rhyme had been substituted for
mere alliteration and assonance, a definite form
was imparted to the verse, and its outline was
rendered clearer by the melody of the Volkslied,
3 Ambros, Gesch. der Musik. H. 276.
4 See iii. 37.i. 6 «• m-
e One of the best modern collections of these old Volkslieder is by
K. YOU Liliencron, published in Leipzig, 186.5-9, under the title of '
historischen Volkslieder der Deutschen vom ISten bio 16ten Jahr-
hundert/ and containing many annotations.
SONG.
which emphasised the final rhyme, and by cover
ing two lines of the poetry with one phrase of the
melody constructed a symmetrical arrangement.
~^Lr~T
^ ti i* \ ^
-j — i^^
- » •— ;
SEES — •^—*-
— L- '
*/
Meine
lie - be Frau
Hut - ter. mit
~~tr~~f~~*~
:J=J — p rt~
5=* *- ? \
=s= =iF=F^i -t- >—
mir ist's bald aus ;
jetzt wer - deus mlch bald
fiih - ren beim Schand-thor hiu - aus.
It will be noted in the above example that the
half-close is on the dominant harmony ; and this
principle, which was originally a peculiar attri
bute of the Volkslied, has been gradually intro
duced into all other kinds of music, and it is now
one of the most important factors of form. [See
FORM, vol. i. p. 543.] Many of the Volkslieder
were composed in ecclesiastical modes ; but un
taught vocalists, singing purely by instinct, soon
learnt to avoid the difficult and harsh intervals
common to some of the modes, and by degrees
used none but the Ionian mode, in which alone
the dominant principle can have full weight. If
the Ionian mode (our own modern scale of
C major) be examined, it will be seen to fall into
two exactly equal parts, with the semitones oc
curring in the same place of each division : — •
C, D, E, F,
G, A, B, C.
As C, the tonic, is the principal note in the first
divisions, so is G the dominant in the second.
And it very soon became a practice to make the
first half of a stanza pause on the dominant har
mony, and the second half to close on the tonic.
The form is generally very concise, as in
Example 5, but lesser forms are sometimes met
with, and were probably due to the influence
of the Church. To the same influence we
may undoubtedly ascribe the melodic melismas
which now and then occur in strophical melo
dies. In the Gregorian music, where little at
tention was paid to rhythm, the melody might be
indefinitely prolonged upon a convenient vowel ;
and similarly we sometimes find in the Volkslied
many notes given to one word, simply because it
is an easy word to sing ; thus —
Es stehtein liud in. di-sem tal, achGottlwas
macht
s'.e da.
Sie will mir hel-fea trau -
ren, dassich so gar kein Bu-leu hab;
das* icii so gar keiu Bu-leu hab.
SONG.
These melodic melismas also allow the voice
great scope in the so-called 'Kehrreim' or re
frain. Another noticeable peculiarity of rhythm
in the Volkslied is the variety of ways in which
the metre is treated. In many instances the
time changes with every bar, and the following
example illustrates a different representation of
the metre in every line of the stanza l : —
. Ionian.
~/r~r
?: — zz—
—^ —
_^£
7"^~
^2
— &
©M* — j-
*^ Ent
Be -
\— 1
- lau -
raubt
-1
bet
werd'
1
ist
ich
-|
der
so
wal
bal
- de
- de
eegn
mein
-— —
i — r~
.n
H
— <= •
*_
—
— i — ^ —
L-f^—J
1 — O ifl
Hi -
.
— i-" — Ji
feins -
lieb,
macht
mich
Kalt
alt
3
das ich die scho'uat muss mei -
- den,
die
mir ge - fal -
- len thut,
etc.
The metre of the verse is always simple, usually
Trochaic or Iambic : dactyls or spondees are rare.
Unlike the songs of many other countries, the
melody of the Volkslied maintains a complete
independence of the accompanying instrument,
and is therefore always vocal and never instru
mental.
The Volkslied would seem to have fixed as
it were instinctively our modern major tonal
system ; and moreover songs even of the !§&
century are extant which were undoubtedly
written in minor keys. The following melody
clearly belongs to the old system, but the care
with which the leading note Gjf is avoided, and
the intervals on which the principal rhymes fall,
make it evident that the A minor key was in
tended.
Es warb em schS-ner Jung - - ling u - ber ein
brei-ten See! Urn ei - nes KSnigs Toch - - ter nach
Leid ge - schah
ii*^
ihm Weh urn eiu-es
-^
KOuiges Toch - - ter nach Leid ges - chah ihm Well.3
Consideration has thus far been given to the
very important contributions of the Volkslied
1 See BOhme, p. 335. The melody and words of this example are
taken from the ' Gassenhawerlin,' 1535, no. 1. There are many ver
sions of this fine melody : we often find it in collections subsequent to
1540. set to the morning hymn 'Ich dank Dir, liebe Herre,' and with
this setting it appears in all chorale-books down to the present day.
2 Georg Forster, ' Ein Ausszug guter alter, neuer Teutschen Lied-
lein in fdnf Theilen und mehrfach neu aufgelegt in der Zeit von
1539—1556,' i. 49. This is one of the numerous versions of the old
legend of the Swimmer. Another version commences ' Ach Elslein,
liebes Elselein,' which is found in all the old collections ot the 16th
century. For instance, in Job. Ott, 1534, no. 37 ; Schmeltzel, Quod-
libet x, 1544 ; Bhaw, Biciuia ii. 1545. no. 19, etc. In Hans JudenkOuig'»
SONG.
to the determination of permanent form in music ;
but its influence on the contemporary music also
requires notice.
It has already been shown that the composers
of other countries, in the I4th, I5th, and i6th
centuries, took secular tunes as themes for their
masses, motets, and other sacred works. The
German composers did the same to a certain
extent, but they more commonly employed the
secular tunes in their secular polyphonic works.
Nevertheless, as regards church music, the Volks-
lied occupied a higher place in Germany than
elsewhere ; for it is not too much to say that
more than half the melodies of the chorale-books
were originally secular. Heinrich von Lauf-
fenberg, in the I5th century, systematically set
his sacred words to secular tunes;1 but the Re
formation made the practice very much more
common. The Reformers wished the congrega
tions to join as much as possible in the singing
of hymns, and with that object they naturally
preferred melodies which were familiar to the
people. A well-known example of the com
bination of sacred words and secular melody is
the song 'Isbruck, ich muss dich lassen,' set by
Heinrich Isaak in 4 parts in 1475, 2 with the
melody in the upper part — a rare arrange
ment at that time. After the Reformation this
tune was adapted by Dr. Hesse to % his sacred
words ' 0 Welt, ich muss dich lassen' ; and in
1633 Paul Gerhardt wrote to it the evening
hymn ' Nun ruhen alle Walder,' in which form
it still remains a favourite in all Lutheran
churches.3 After many transformations, the old
love-song, ' Mein gmuth 1st mir verwirret,' * now
lives in one of the most beautiful and solemn
chorales of both the Lutheran and Roman
Catholic churches, namely, ' O Haupt, voll Blut
und Wunden,' which Bach has introduced so
often in his Passionmusik according to S. Mat
thew. Again, 'Ich hb'rt ein frewlein klagen/
was adapted to ' Hillf Gott, wem soil ich klagen' ;
' 0 lieber Hans versorg dein Gans,' to ' 0 fieber
Gott, das dein Gebot'; and 'Venus, du und dein
Kind to ' Auf meinen lieben Gott.' Many dance-
songs, especially the so-called 'Ringeltanze,'5
were likewise set to sacred words. It should
(1523) and Hans Neusiedler's (1536) Lute-books, the melody is always
In A minor with the G Jf marked. In the singing-books the sharp was
never marked, but undoubtedly always used. In Neusiedler's Lute-
book it stands thus :—
SONG.
619
3=
Ach Els - leiu. lie - bes Els - lein mein, wie
-•-j-
^
-^
L
gern war ich bei dir! So sind zwei tiefe
Was - - - ser wol zwi-scheu dir und mir!
1 Ambros, iii. 875. 2 Georg Forster, 1. no. 86.
3 BOhme, Altd. Liederbuch, p. 332 ; and ISAAK, in this Dictionary,
vol. ii. p. 22.
4 The song is to be found in Hans Leo Hassler's ' Lustgarten neuer
teutsches Gesfinge, Palletti. Galliarden. Intraden, etc.' NUrnber0',
1601. 5 See BOhme, pp. 368. 369. etc.
however be understood, that even after the
adoption of the Ionian mode in the Volkslied,
and the consequent settlement of our modern
tonality, a certain proportion of Volkslieder con
tinued to be written in the old ecclesiastical
modes. Most of those which the church used
were originally written in the old tonal system.
Such as are still sung in churches have nearly
all undergone a change ; but there are a few
exceptions, like the hymn 'Ach Gott thu' dich
erbarmen,' which, according to the modern cho
rale-books, is still sung in the old Dorian mode,6
although J. S. Bach, when using it, changed it
into the modern D minor scale. In its original
secular form it stands 7 thus : —
. Dorian.
fl) V J — S
— i i — i •* —
-m s> t 4^-i —
• — ^i~
SM-
Frisch auf,
Wir lo -
ihr Landsknecht al -
ben Gott den Her -
- le, seid
- ren, dar
1 I-
"1 FT
I -
i -ii i
h -ll
i
<^2 m *
•^ • i .H -s1
• ll
frOhlich guter
Ding! zu den edeln
~1
| 1
I
_j 1
• 22 •
,
•^ • ±m*rnz2
_. 1
KOn'g. Er
legt uns g'waltgen Haufen
* -^- -0-
ins Feld, es
i i
' i I
4 _ I /*
__] J " *
• ". •! • ^ al I j
• • *
•
soil keinLandsknecht trauren um geld ; er
will uns ehr-lich
l
1
I |
1 -i
1 J
1 *
J i •
'T?
•1 • <•
2
» •
loh - nen mit Stiivern und Sunnen - kronen, mit
z3-^_« -J
rjrfr^L-J — _J_4
1=^-1
Stiivern und Sonnen - kro -
- ueii.
Until the end of the i6th century the common,
though not invariable characteristics of the
Chorale and Volkslied were — the melody or
cantus firmus in the tenor, the key or mode
steadily adhered to, a diatonic intervallic pro
gression, and a note given to every syllable.
Both were for the most part written in white
notes, because, until Philippe de Vitry intro
duced notes of less value towards the close of
the 1 6th century, breves and semibreves were
the only notes employed. But we must beware
of misconception as regards tempo, for according
to our modern notation, the semibreves should
be regarded and written as crotchets.
Whatever else may be affirmed of the Chorale,
this at least is clear, that it gained rather than
lost by the adoption of secular melodies; they
emancipated it from stiffness and formality, they
gave it heart and living warmth. So far re
moved from irreverence were the secular me
lodies, and so appropriate to the sacred text,
that the music is generally more expressive of
the words in the Chorale than in the Volks
lied. But perhaps the true explanation of this
e See the Erfurt Chorale-book for instance.
7 gee BOhme, pp. 521. 522. 523.
620
SONG.
peculiarity is, that in the case of the Chorale, the
words were either written expressly for a chosen
melody, or the melody was selected for its ap
propriateness to particular words. The melody
of that just mentioned, 'O Haupt voll Blut
•und Wunden,' is undoubtedly secular, but what
melody could better express a deep and poignant
religious sorrow ?
It is well known that some of the most famous
folk-songs of different countries ave founded on
the same subject, whether it be a legendary
or historical event, or an incident of ordinary
life. The accessories of course vary, and impart
a local colouring to each version of the Kong;
but the central theme is in all the same. In
like manner the same tunes are the property
of different countries. Their identity may not,
perhaps, be detected at first beneath the dis
guises in which it is enveloped by national va
rieties of scale -and rhythm and harmony; but
it cannot elude a closer examination, and it
is probable that careful study would establish
many identities hitherto unsuspected. A good ex
ample of these cosmopolitan songs is ' Ach Elslein
liebes Elselein.' Its subject is the legend of
the Swimmer, the classical story of Hero and
Leander ; and it has a local habitation in Hol
land, Sweden, Russia, etc., as well as in Ger
many.1 ' Der Bettler,' also, which is still sung
in many parts of Germany and in Sweden, is
identical with ' The Jolly Beggar ' of Scotland.2
During the 1 5th, i6th, and I7th centuries the
spirit and power of the Volkslieder were felt in
every branch of music. Not only did great
masters introduce them into their polyphonic
works, both sacred and secular, but lutenists
were supplied from the same source with tunes
for their instruments, and organists with themes
for their extemporary performances. The pro
gress of polyphonic music in Germany had been
checked by the discontinuance of the Mass after
the Reformation, as has been shown in another
part of this work [see SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION],
but a new impetus was given to it by the con
trapuntal treatment of secular songs by great
composers. As examples of such treatment we
may mention — 'Allein dein g'stalt,' 'Ach herzigs
herz,' by Heinrich Finck; 'Mir ist ein roth
Goldfingerlein'; 'Ich soil und muss ein Bulen
haben,' by Ludwig Senfl; ' Elend bringt Pein,'
by Benedict Ducis ; ' Es wollt ein alt Mann,' by
Stephan Mahu ; ' Der Gutzgauch auf dem Zaune
sass,' by Lorenz Lemlin ; 'Ich weiss mir ein
hiibschen griinen Wald,' by Sixt Dietrich; 'Es
geht gen diesen Sominer/ by Arnold von Bruck; 3
etc.
This brings us to the Kunstlied, which in its
primary sense signified only the contrapuntal
treatment of the Song by learned musicians.4
With the polyphonic Kunstlied we have here
1 As to the Swedish version of the song, see Svenska Volksvisor,
Vol. i. p. 108, and vol. ii. p. 210.
2 See Crosby's ' Scottish Songs,' p. 58.
3 A'l these songs, and numerous others, are contained In the
different numbers of Johann Olt's and Georg Forster's collections.
4 The very much wider signification which the term Kuustlied
afterwards acquired has been referred to at ihe outset of this article.
SONG.
no concern, beyond what just suffices to point
out the changes through which it successively
passed. The composers who used the Yolks-
lied in polyphonic works were masters of every
contrapuntal form ; sometimes they worked one
melody with another, as Arnold von Brack, who
combined the song 'Es taget vor dem Walde'
with 'Kein Adler in der 5Welt'; or if they did
not treat the selected melody as a canon (as Eckel
treated ' Ach Jungfrau, ihr seid wolgemuth,' 6),
they broke it up into fragments for imitation.
When composing their own melodies, they always
adhered to the church scales; and used the
new system only when adopting a Volkslied.
The contrapuntal treatment had, however, one
great disadvantage — it constantly necessitated
the severance of the melody into fragments, and
thus the clear concise form of the Song, which the
Volkslied had done so much to establish, was in
danger of disappearance. But happily at this
juncture (about 1600) Hans Leo Hassler came
to its rescue. Having studied in Italy, he
breathed into his songs the light secular spirit
of Italian Villanelle and Fa-la-las, and gave more
prominence to the melody than to the other
voice-parts. His dance-songs also, with their
short rhythmical phrases, did much to restore the
concise form of the Song. Similar characteristics
are noticeable in Melchior Franck's and Eeg-
nart's collections of songs.7 In the beginning
of the 17th century solo songs were first heard
in Germany ; and there, as everywhere else, the
introduction of the monodic system was due to
the influence of Italy.
The revolution begun by Italy would seem to
have first affected the church music rather than
the secular music of Germany. Innovations of
Italian origin are plainly discernible in the sa
cred works of Pratorius and Heinrich Schiitz;
but neither of these composers improved the secu
lar monodic song. German poetry had now
fallen to a debased condition. It produced no
thing better than songs of vapid and artificial
sentiment addressed to a conventional Phyllis or
Amaryllis. A nd the language which it employed
was a nondescript mixture of French, Latin, and
stilted German. Since Luther's death the simple
vernacular had ceased to be in repute. But on
the 24th August, 1617, a meeting of German
patriots was held, who set themselves to restore
their native tongue to honour, and with that view
to study the introduction of method and rule
into its grammar and poetry. Other patriotic
groups were soon formed with a like purpose,
and by the year 1680 these associations num
bered 890 members. Their labours quickly bore
good fruit. The success of a group of Konigsberg
poets was specially remarkable, and was doubt
less due in a great measure to the skill with
which one of the best of them, Heinrich Albert
6 See Betssmann, Gesch. d. deutschen Liedes, p. 69.
6 Ibid. p. 72.
' See ' Tricinia nova lieblicher amorosischer GesSnge mlt schOnen
poetischen Texten gezieret und etHcher Massen each Italienische
Art mit Fleiss componirt durch Melchior Francken,' Nttrnberg,16H
and ' Kurzweilige teutsche Lieder zu dreien Stimtnen nach Art der
Neapo'itanen oder Welschen Villanellen durch Jacobus Beguart IB
Druck verfertlgt,' Niirnberg. 1578.
SONG.
SONG.
[gee ALBEBT], set his own and his associates1
songs to music. His compositions became ex
tremely popular ; and he has been styled ' the
father of the volksthumlicb.es Lied.' Schein and
Hammerschmidt had preceded him on the right
path, but their taste and talent were frustrated
by the worthlessness of the words they set to
music. The poetry on which Albert worked was
not by any means of a high order, nor was he
its slave, but it had sufficient merit to demand a
certain measure of attention. This Albert gave
to it, and he wrote melodiously. Several of
his songs are for one voice with clavicembalo
accompaniment, but their harmony is poor, as
the following example shows1: — >
Euer Pracht und stol-zes Prangen, Ihr Jung-frau-en so Ihr
In den ro - sen-ro-then Wan-gen, in dem Ha -ar mil Gold
^
4=t
fuhrt,
geziert,
-nes Lo-bes nlcht wo Euch FrGmmlgkeit ge-
-(=-=--,
m
bricht.
The movement begun by Albert was carried on
"by Ahle, and the Kriegers, Adam and Johann.
Johann's songs are very good, and exhibit a
marked improvement in grace and rhythm. The
first bars of his song ' Kommt, wir wollen ' have
all the clearness of the best Volkslieder : — •
2Ui
— 3
— • — j •
• • * .
CH
i i '
L. 1
•
-^
i '
" 1 '
r
Kommt, wir wol - len uns spa -
6 S
zie - ren
"V
1
/•l
o
i
i
ft A
\ .. \
— _i
t4^~-
-S— I P-% J
— ¥* 1 1
i — j . m — '-* — '*3—-
"1 *
9
well die Zeit so
gun - stig ist.
5 6
etc.
• : \-
r-& ^ 1 t^-f-1
Meanwhile the Kunstlied or polyphonic song
had ceased to advance : other branches, especially
instrumental and dramatic music, had absorbed
composers, and songs began to be called ' Odes ' and
'Arias.' Writing in 1698, Keiser says that can
tatas had driven away the old German songs, and
that their place was being taken by songs con-
1 In this song the voice has the upper melody, and the clavicembalo
the two under parts.
sisting of recitatives and arias mixed.2 Among
the writers of the i8th century who called their
songs 'arias,' and who wrote chiefly in the aria
form, were Graun, Agricola, Sperontes,Telemann,
Quantz, Doles, Kirnberger, C. P. E. Bach, Nichel-
mann, Marpurg, and Neefe (Beethoven's master).
They certainly rendered some services to the Song.
They set a good example of attention to the words,
both as regards metre and expression ; they va
ried the accompaniment by the introduction of
arpeggios and open chords ; and they displayed
a thorough command of the strophical form. But,
notwithstanding these merits, their songs, with
few exceptions, must be pronounced to be dry,
inanimate, and deficient in melody.3
It might strike the reader as strange if the
great names of J. S. Bach and Handel were
passed by in silence ; but, in truth, neither Bach
nor Handel ever devoted real study to the Song.
Such influence as they exercised upon it was in
direct. Bach, it is true, wrote a few secular
songs, and one of them was the charming little
song ' Willst du dein Herz mir schenken,'
which is essentially ' volksthiimlich ' :*
Willst du dein Herz mir schenk-en.
So
r
— M
fang es heim - lich an
His two comic cantatas also contain several of
great spirit ; but it was through his choral works
that he most powerfully affected the Song. The
only English song which Handel is known to have
written is a hunting-song for bass voice,3 of which
we give the opening strain : —
The morn-ing is charm-ing, all Na-ture is gay, A -
^
way, my brave boys, to your hor-ses a - way)
but his influence upon the Song was through his
operas and oratorios, and there it was immense.6
Equally indirect, as will be seen presently, were
the effects produced on it by the genius of Gluck,
Haydn, and even of Mozart.
At the period we have now reached, namely
the end of the i8th century, a new and popular
form of the Kunstlied appeared, and this was
the ' volksthumliches Lied.'7 The decline of
the Volkslied during the 1 7th century has been
sometimes attributed to the distracted state of
Germany; and certainly the gloomy atmosphere
of the Thirty Years War and the desolation of
2 See the preface to his Cantata collection. See also Lindner, 'Qe-
schichte des deutschen Liedes im xviii Jahrhundert,' p. 53.
s Full information respecting these songs, and abundant examples,
will be found in Lindner's work referred to in the preceding note.
4 But the authenticity of this is much questioned by Spitta (Bach,
i. 834).
B In the FitzwiUiam Library at Cambridge.
6 See Schneider, ' Das muslkalische Lied,1 vol. HI. p. 190.
7 The term ' volksthiimliches Lied,' defies exact translation; but,
speaking broadly, means a simple popular form of the artistic song.
622
SONG.
SONG.
the Palatinate, cannot have been favourable to it. '
But no political or social troubles could affect its
existence so deeply as an invasion upon its own
ground by the Kunstlied. As long as the artistic
song dwelt apart, among learned musicians, the
Volkslied had little to fear. But when once it
had become simple and melodious enough to be
easily caught by the people, the Volkslied was
supplanted : its raison d'etre was gone. In
churches and schools, at concerts and theatres,
the public grew habituated to the artistic song,
and the old Volkslieder faded from memory. The
few that retained any popularity were in the
modern tonal system. The volksthiimliches Lied
is, in short, a combination of the Volkslied and
the Kunstlied, and its area of capacity is a very
wide one. In the hands of a true master it rises
to a high level of poetic beauty, and in the hands
of a bad workman it can descend to any depths
of stupidity or vulgarity, without ceasing to be
volksthiimlich. Songs there were, undoubtedly,
before the time of J. A. Hiller, to which this
epithet could properly be applied; but he was
the first to secure for them a thoroughly popular
recognition. He belonged to the second half of
the 1 8th century, and was really an operatic com
poser. It was the songs in his ' Singspiele ' which
took so strong a hold of the public. [See HILLER,
J. A. ; SINGSPIEL.] A favourite tune from his
Singspiel ' Die Jagd ' will serve as a specimen of
his style : —
Als ich auf mei-ne
Da kam aus dem ge-
JEt
: ••
Blei - che ein Stuckchen Garn be - goss i Das sprach, ach habt er-
striiu-che ein Miid -chen a - them - los.
bar - men, steht mei - nem Vater bei. | Dort schlug ein Fall dem
i* r r
—EH- I ,
*— *— if — '-
Ar - men das linke Bein ent - zwei. |
Another, ' Ohne Lieb und ohne Wein,' taken
from his Singspiel ' Der Teufel ist los,' and still
sung in Germany with much zest, was one of
the first of the Kunstlieder to be received into
the ranks of the Volkslieder. J. Andre", the
author of the ' Kheinweinlied/ was a contem
porary of Hiller's ; and so was J. A. P. Schulz
who did much for the volksthiimliches Lied. He
was careful above others of his time to select
poetic words for his music ; and the composer
was now provided with a store of fresh and natu
ral poems of the Volkslied type by Burger, Clau
dius, Holty, the Stolbergs, Voss, and other poets
of the Gottingen school. So long as Schulz kept
to a simple form, he was always successful, and
many of his songs are still the delight of Ger
man school children. In his more ambitious
but less happy efforts, when he tried to give full
expression to the words by the music, he aban
doned the volksthiimlich form, as his song ' Die
Spinnerin ' will show : —
3
*--•-
Ich ar
mes
- chen ! mem
JE±Zt
:S=i^S:
TI SZ
Spin -
g.
ner - rfid-chea will gar
nicht
Starting from Hiller and Schulz the volks
thiimliches Lied pursued two different roads.
Its composers in the Hiller school, such as
Ferdinand Kauer, Wenzel Miiller, and Himmel,
were shallow and imperfectly cultivated musi
cians. Their sentimental melodies had a certain
superficial elegance which gave them for a time
an undeserved repute. A few of Himmel a
songs — for example, 'Vater ich rufe Dich' and
'An Alexis send' ich Dich'— are still in vogue
among some classes of the German population,
but, measured by any good standard, their value
is inconsiderable. The dramatic composers,
Winter and Jos. Weigl, may be reckoned to
SONG.
have been of this school, in so far as they were
song-writers ; and its tendencies reappeared in
our own day in Reissiger and Abt. On the
other hand, Schulz's followers were real mu
sicians ; and if they became too stiff and formal,
their defects were a fruit of their virtues. Their
stiffness and formality were the outcome of a
strict regard to form and symmetry, and of a
praiseworthy contempt for false sentiment. Most
of them could write at will in more than one
style. Whenever they chose the volksthum-
liches Lied, they proved their mastery of it ; and
in other kinds of composition they were equally
at home. Their names must, therefore, be
mentioned in connection with more than one
class of song. The first and best of Schulz's
school was Mendelssohn's favourite, J. F.
Reichardt. He was singularly happy in his
' Kinderlieder,' but his most valuable services
to the Song were given on other ground, as will
appear later. Next to him came Anselm Weber,
and Nageli. Zelter, Klein, Ludwig Berger, and
Friedrich Schneider, are entitled, by their songs
for male chorus, to be counted among the fol
lowers of Schulz.
It would be wrong to leave the volksthum-
liches Lied without mentioning the names of
Conradin Kreutzer and Heinrich Marschner,
whose operatic songs proved themselves to be
truly volksthumlich by their firm hold on the
hearts of the people, and of Carl Krebs and
Kiicken, who have also set an honourable mark
on this kind of song. It is, likewise, proper to
add the titles of a few typical songs which are
found in every modern collection of so-called
Volkslieder, though really volksthiimliche Lieder
converted into Volkslieder. Some of them are
by celebrated composers whose fame was chiefly
won in other fields ; some by men, like Silcher,
Gersbach, and Gust. Reichardt, who wrote nothing
but volksthiimliche Lieder ; of some the authorship
is wholly unknown ; and of others it is disputed.
Worthy to be mentioned as representative
songs of this class are 'Es ist bestimmt in
G-ottes Rath'; 'Ach, wie ists moglich dann';
'Prinz Eugenius'; ' Zu Mantua in Banden' ;
' Wir hatten gebaut ein stattliches Haus ' ; ' Es
zogen drei Burschen'; ' Was klinget urid singet
die Strasse herauf; 'Der Mai ist gekommen';
'Bekriinzt mitLaub'; 'Gaudeamus'; 'Es ging
ein Frosch spazieren ' ; ' 0 Tannebaum, O Tan-
nebaum ' ; « Morgenroth, Morgenroth ' ; ' Ich
hatt' einen Kameraden ' ; ' Was blasen die
Trompeten'; 'Es geht bei gedarnpftem Trom-
melklang ' ; ' Morgen miissen wir verreisen ' ;
1 Ich weiss nicht was soil es bedeuten ' ; 'In
einem kiihlen Grunde'; 'So viel Stern am
Himmel stehen'; 'Es kann ja nicht immer so
bleiben'; 'Nach Sevilla, nach Sevilla'; 'Es ist
ein Schnitter der heisst Tod'; 'Der alte Bar-
barossa'; 'Die Fahnenwacht ' ; 'Madele ruck,
ruck, ruck'; 'Was ist des Deutschen Vater-
land,' etc.1 None of these songs are vulgar,
i The reader will find a multitude of others in the various col
lections which are constantly issuing from the musical press of
Germany. He may, for instance, consult Pink's ' Musikalischer Haus-
SONG.
623
nor even commonplace. They are familiar to
all classes, young and old; and the heartiness
with which they are everywhere sung attests
their vitality. Singing in unison is compara
tively rare among Germans ; their universal love
and knowledge of music naturally predispose
them to singing in parts. A regiment on the
march, a party of students on a tour, or even
labourers returning from work, all alike sing
these favourite songs in parts with remarkable
accuracy and precision. And the natural apti
tude of the nation for this practice is perpetually
fostered by the ' Singvereine ' or singing-clubs
which exist even in the most obscure and se
cluded corners of Germany.
If it be asked by what qualities the volks-
thumliches Lied can be recognised, the answer
would be, that it is strophical in form, and has
an agreeable melody, easy to sing, a pure and
simple harmony, an unpretending accompaniment,
a regular rhythm, a correct accentuation, and
words inspired by natural sentiment. The mere
enumeration of these qualities explains its popu
larity. But it lacked the poetic and thoughtful
treatment both of words and music, which sub
sequently raised the lyric song to the level of
true art.
It is now time to inquire in what ways the Song
was treated by some of the greatest composers of
the 1 8th and igth centuries — by Gluck, Haydn,
Mozart, Beethoven, Spohr and Weber. Gluck
was the contemporary of Graun, Agricola, and
Kirnberger ; and like them he called most of his
songs odes. But the standpoint from which he
regarded the Song was very different from theirs.
Applying his theories about the Opera [see
GLUCK and OPERA] to the Song, he steadfastly
aimed at a correct accentuation of the words in
the music, and the extinction of the Italian form
of melody, which required the complete subor
dination, if not the entire sacrifice to itself, of
every other element of composition. ' The
union,' wrote Gluck to La Harpe in I777> 'be
tween the air and the words should be so close,
that the poem should seem made for the music
no less than the music for the poem ' ; and he
conscientiously strove to be true to this ideal in
all his work. But though he revolutionised the
Opera, he left no deep mark on the Song ; for
indeed he never devoted to it the best of his
genius. His few songs, chiefly Klopstock's odes,
have no spontaneity about them, but are dry and
pedantic, and with all his superiority to his con
temporaries in aims and principles of composition,
his odes are scarcely better than theirs. Here is
an example : —
1
.-,
_fe_J _JK,
r
.
— -~v
1
f\ ?
2 [S
1 *
IB 5 •! W A]
-'"If*
ic; 1 U
\N\y
,-m .
* K! ^^" f 4* !
^
Will-kom-men o sil-ber-ner
I |
/• /
3 *
g
" J J
-*- \
j t
"•^J •
22
chatz,' or the ' Commers-Buch fiir den deutschen Studenten,' con-
aining Studenten-, Soldatea-, Irink-. Fest-, National-, iladcben-,
iiuderlieder, etc.
624
SONG.
Mond, schO-nen, still -er Ge-fShrt der Nacht! Du ent-
=^=3=
fliehst? El - le nicht.
bleib Ge - dan - ken -
Freund !
Sehet er blelbt! das Ge - wolk
~^ J
I/TN
(• • '^'F •
E - (• •
P ' I-
r •
^ u . ^
* r
das Ge - wOlk
wall - te nur
hln.
i [i
)^^*
*• i
h
-•- J — J
? . — —
t2 ~
I
One song of the very highest merit was writ
ten by Haydn. His national air, ' Gott erhalte
Franz den Kaiser,' is perfect of its kind.1 Simple
and popular, yet breathing a lofty and dignified
patriotism, it satisfies the severest standard of
criticism. But it was a unique effort ; none of
his other songs approach within measurable
distance of it. It was his habit to conceive them
entirely from the instrumental point of view. As
Schneider truly says, Haydn ' treats the vocal
melody exactly as a pianoforte or violin motif,
under which he places some words which only
superficially agree in rhythm with the melody.'3
For Haydn's true lyrics we must turn (as Schnei
der bids us turn) to the andantes and adagios
of his quartets and symphonies ; just as we
must study the great choral works of Bach and
Handel if we would understand and appreciate
the action of those great masters on the Song.
The versatility of Mozart's powers is visible in
his songs. Some of them might be described as
arias, and others as volksthiimliche Lieder ; some
are lyrical, and others dramatic, and yet Mozart
cannot be said to have impressed his own great
individuality upon the Song. He was not at his
i For the origin of this see HAYDN (vol. i. p, 714), and EMPEROR'S
HYMN. 2 See Schneider, ' Ges. d. Liedes,' vol. iii. p. 369.
SONG.
best in that field. The least happy of his songs
are those in which he set homely or thoroughly
popular words to music : his genius lived too
much in an ideal world for work of that kind.
Thus in his 'Ich mochte wohl der Kaiser sein'
the music ceases after the first bar to be volks-
thumlich. It was in the opera that he put forth
his full strength, and his operatic songs often
derive from their simple joyous melodies a truly
popular character. Most of his songs are in the
aria form, and their exquisite melodies almost
obliterate such faults of accentuation as occur in
the following example : —
33*
Wenn dlr die Freu - da win - ket
nnd
3an=3:
•=!—
tnanch - - mat das
Ge - schlck
5E
The reader will observe what exaggerated em
phasis the music puts upon such unimportant
syllables of the verse as ' mal ' and ' ge.' Mo
zart's masterpiece in the Song was ' Das Veil-
chen,' which he wrote to Goethe's words; and
had he written other songs of like excellence, his
position as a song- writer would have been more
on a level with his unsurpassed fame in other
branches of music. In ' Das Veilchen ' he treats
every detail independently. When the song
passes from narrative to the violet's own utter
ance, the character of the music changes ; and
the accompaniment also supplies a vivid though
delicate representation of the narrative, while
the unity of the Song is never lost amid varieties
of detail.3 For such minute painting in music
the ordinary harmonic basis of tonic and dominant
is not wide enough. Modulations into other keys
are requisite. In this song, therefore, Mozart
does not confine himself to the principal keys,
G major and D major, but introduces the keys
of G minor, Eb, and Bb major, though without
any change of signature. Neither does he pay
much heed to a clear demarcation of the strophic
divisions, which had hitherto been regarded as
indispensable, but by the simple force of a homo
geneous rhythm fully sustains the unity essen
tial to lyric song. The very little that yet re
mained to bring this class of song to perfection
was subsequently accomplished by Schubert.
Some of Beethoven's earlier songs— such as
'An einen Saugling,' ' Das Kriegslied,' 'Molly's
Abschied,' and 'Der freie Mann' — are volks-
thumlich, and resemble Schulz's compositions.
For the accompaniment they have the melody
3 For expositions of this song see Schneider, vol. ill. p. 290, and
Beissmann, ' Ges. d. deut. Liedes,' p. 207.
SONG.
harmonised, and a syllable is given to each note :
they should therefore be declaimed rather than
sung. The structure is similar in Gellert's sacred
songs, op. 48, except in the 'Busslied,' where
there is a fuller development of the accompani
ment. Of Beethoven's early songs the best known
probably is 'Adelaide,' and it is written in a larger
form than those already referred to. Its form may
be termed the scena-form. In it both voice and
accompaniment are made to give exact expression
to every word of the poem, and changes of tempo
and key impart to it a dramatic cast. But our
chief interest lies in Beethoven's lyric songs. He
set six songs of Goethe's as op. 75> and three as
op. 83. There is much in the style and spirit of
these lyrics which might have tempted him to
use either the scena or the cantata-form ; but
the strophical division corresponds so well with
their general character that he could not dis
regard it. He left it therefore to the instru
mental part to satisfy their dramatic require
ments. In Mignon's song, ' Kennst du das
Land,' each stanza has the same beautiful me
lody, and the accompaniment alone varies. In
other cases, as in Goethe's ' Trocknet nicht '
(Wonne der Wehmuth), the melody is a mere
recitation, and all the importance of the song
belongs to its accompaniment. In Jeitteles'
Liederkreis, ' An die feme Geliebte,' op. 98, the
unity which makes the cycle is wholly the work
of the composer, and not of the poet. It is
Beethoven who binds the songs together by short
instrumental interludes, which modulate so as
to introduce the key of the next song, and by
weaving the melody of the first song into the last.
Most of the songs of this beautiful cycle are
strophical, but with great variety of accompani
ment, and the just balance of the vocal and
instrumental parts equally contributes to the
faithful expression of lyric thought and feeling.
In songs which had more of the aria form Bee
thoven was less successful. In short, the principal
result produced by him with regard to the song
was the enlargement of the part sustained by the
pianoforte. He taught the instrument, as it were,
to give conscious and intelligent utterance to the
poetic intentions of the words. His lyric genius
rose to its loftiest heights in his instrumental
works: and here again its full perfection must be
looked for in the slow movements of his orchestral
and chamber compositions.
Spohr also wrote lyric songs, a task for which
his romantic and contemplative nature well fitted
But his songs are marred by excessive
SONG.
625
him.
elaboration of minutiae, and in the profusion of
details clearness of outline is lost, and form itself
disappears. Again, his modulations, or rather
transitions, though never wantonly introduced,
are so frequent as to be wearisome. Of all
his songs 'Der Bleicherin Nachtlied' and 'Der
Rosenstrauch ' are freest from these faults, and
they are his best.
A greater influence was exercised upon the
Song by Carl Maria von Weber. He published
two books of Volkslieder, op. 54 and op. 64, with
new melodies, of which the best-known are
VOL. in. FT. 5.
' Wenn ich ein Voglein war' and 'Mein Schat-
zerl ist hubsch.' Of his other songs the most
celebrated are the cradle-song ' Schlaf Herzens-
sohnchen ' and the ' Leyer und Schwert ' songs
(for instance, 'Das Volk steht auf and ' Du
Schwert an meiner Linken'), and these songs
deserve their celebrity. Others indeed, such as
' Ein steter Kampf,' are not so well known nor
heard so often as they ought to be. Weber's
fame as a song-writer has perhaps suffered some
what, like Mozart's, from the circumstance that
man}* of his best songs are in his operas ; and it
has been partially eclipsed by the supreme ex
cellence of one or two composers who were imme
diately subsequent to him. It was also unlucky
for him that he wrote most of his accompaniments
for the guitar. But in the solos and choruses of
' Preciosa,' ' Der Freischiitz,' and ' Euryanthe '
there are romantic melodies of unfailing charm
to the German people. 'They are filled,' says
Reissmann, ' with the new spirit awakened in
Germany by the War of Liberation — the spirit
which inspired the lays of Arndt, Schenkendorf,
Riickert, and Kb'rner. The dreamy tenderness
of the old Volkslieder was united by Weber to
the eager adventurous spirit of a modern time.
His conceptions are never of great intellectual
depth, nor are his forms remarkably developed,
but the entrainante expression with which he
writes gives his compositions an irresistible fresh
ness, even after the lapse of half a century.'1
Incidental reference has already been made
more than once to Goethe, but a few words must
be added on the obligations of the Song to him.
The fine outburst of lyric song which enriched
the music of Germany in his lifetime was very
largely due to him. The strong but polished
rhythm and the full melody of his verse were an
incentive and inspiration to composers. Reichardt
was the first to make it a systematic study to
set Goethe's lyrics to music. Some of them were
set by him as early as 1780; but in 1793 he
published a separate collection entitled ' Goethe's
lyrische Gedichte,' and containing thirty poems.
In 1809 he issued a more complete collection,
underthe title of c Goethe's Lieder, Oden, Balladen,
und Romanzen mit Musik, v. J. Fr. Reichardt '
So long as Reichardt merely declaimed the words
in melody, or otherwise made the music conscien
tiously subordinate to the verse, he was success
ful; but he failed whenever he allowed himself
to think less of the words and more of the tune.
Goethe's words were, in short, a sure guide for
a talent like his. In the genuine volksthumliches
Lied he did not shine ; he spared no endeavour
to catch the exact spirit of popular poetry, but in
his intent pursuit of it he lost that natural
spontaneity of melody which the volksthumliches
Lied requires. Reichardt was not a great master,
but he may claim the honour of having struck the
true key-note of lyrical songs: and greater artists
than himself immediately followed in his foot-
1 See Keissmann, p. 167. It is worth white to note that Weber him
self says, in his literary -works, that 'strict truth in declamation i<
the first and foremost requisite of vocal music . . . any vocal music
that alters or effaces the poet's meaning and intention is a failure.'
Ss
626
SONG.
steps. Nothing that he ever wrote is better than
his setting of Tieck's 'Lied der Nacht,' and in
this song he clearly shows himself to be the fore
runner of Schubert, Schumann, and Mendels
sohn. A younger contemporary, Zelter, also made
a reputation by setting Goethe's words to music.
Zelter was himself a friend of Goethe's ; and so
great an admirer was the poet of Zelter's music
for his own songs, that be preferred it to the
settings of Reichardt, preferring Reichardt's set
tings to those of Beethoven and Schubert, and
perhaps those of Eberwein to either of the three.
Through some strange obliquity of taste or judg
ment, Goethe, as is well known, never recognised
the merits of these two very great composers.
Zelter, however, was a writer of considerable
talent, and advanced beyond his predecessors
in harmonic colouring and consistency of style.
His early songs were strophical, without variety
or ornamentation of melody, except sometimes
in the last stanza : but in later years he recom-
posed some of these early songs with such dif
ferent treatment that he seems occasionally to be
the precursor of the so-called ' durchkomponirtes
Lied ' — in which every stanza has different music.
Another of this group of writers, Ludwig Berger,
worked on the same lines as Reichardt. But
his excessive attention to the declamatory part of
the Song has a tendency to break up the melody
and destroy its consecutive unity. On the other
hand, his pianoforte accompaniments are remark
ably good. Without overpowering the melody
they have a singular power of expression. His
song 'Trost in Thranen,' op. 33, no. 3, may be
cited as an illustration. Bernhard Klein may also
be mentioned as a writer of music to Goethe's
songs. His style was not unlike Zelter's ; but he
aimed at vocal brilliancy, and was somewhat
negligent of the instrumental part.
If the general results of the period through
which we have just passed be regarded as a
whole, it will be seen that the various conditions
requisite for the perfection of the Song had
matured. The foundations and all the main
parts of the structure had been built ; it re
mained only to crown the edifice. Starting from
the volksthiimliches Lied, the Berlin composers
had demonstrated the necessity of full attention
to the words. Mozart and Weber had given it
a home in the opera. Mozart and Beethoven had
developed its instrumental and dramatic elements ;
and had, further, shown that the interest of the
Song is attenuated by extension into the larger
scena-form. Nothing therefore of precept or
example was wanting by which genius might be
taught how to make the compact form of the
Song a perfect vehicle of lyrical expression.
The hour was ripe for the man; and the hour
and the man met when Schubert arose.
This wonderful man, the greatest of song- writers,
has been so fully and appreciatively treated in
other pages of this Dictionary1 that it would be
superfluous to do more here than examine the
development of the Song under him. So fertile
i The reader should also consult Beissmann's ' Dos deutsche Lied
in seiner historischen Entwicklung.'and his ' Ges. d. deutsch. Liedes.'
SONG.
was his genius that we have more than 600 of
his songs, and their variety is as remarkable as
their number. There was scarcely a branch of
the subject to which he did not turn his hand,
and nihil tetigit qiiod non ornavit. He was master
of the Song in every stage — whether it were the
Volkslied, or the Ode, orthevolksthumlichesLied,
or the pure lyric song, or the Ballade andRomanze.
And his preeminent success was largely due to his
complete recognition of the principle that in the
Song intellect should be the servant of feeling
rather than its master.
The essence of true Song, as Schubert clearly
saw, is deep, concentrated emotion, enthralling
words and music alike, and suffusing them with
its own hues. Full of poetry himself, he could
enter into the very heart and mind of the poet,
and write, as it were, with his own identity merged
in another's. So wide was the range of his sym
pathetic intuition that he took songs of different
kinds from all the great German poets, and widely
as their styles varied, so did his treatment.
Some demanded a simple strophic form; some
a change of melody for every stanza ; and others
an elaborate or dramatic accompaniment. But
whatever the words might call for, that Schubert
gave them with unerring instinct.
His best compositions are lyrical, and the most
perfect are the songs which he wrote to Goethe's
words. If Schubert had a fault as a song- writer,
it was his 'love of extension'; and from this
temptation he was guarded by the concise and
compact form of Goethe's songs. These lyrics are,
therefore, his masterpieces, and it is scarcely pos
sible to conceive higher excellence than is dis
played in his 'Gretchen am Spinnrad,' the
' Wanderer's Nachtlied,' the songs from ' West-
ostlicher Divan,' and 'Wilhelm Meister.'2 In
these songs, beauty and finish are bestowed with
so even a hand, both on the voice-part and on the
accompaniment, that it would be impossible to
say that either takes precedence of the other. In
the songs which he wrote to Schiller's words,
especialfy in the earlier ones, the accompaniment
is more important than the voice-part. This how
ever is demanded by the dramatic form of ballads
like 'DerTaucher'and 'RitterToggenburg.' And
Schubert perceived that a somewhat similar kind
of setting was appropriate to antique, mytho
logical, or legendary songs, such as Schiller's
' Dithyrambe' and ' Gruppe aus dem Tartarus,'
Mayrhofer's ' Memnon ' and ' Der entsiihnte
Orest,' Goethe's ' Schwager Kronos,' ' Ganymecl,'
' Grenzen der Menschheit,' and some of Ossian's
songs. These last are also noticeable as an illustra
tion of his practice of writing songs in sets. Some
of these sets had been written as cyclic poems by
their authors, and to this category belonged the
'Mullerlieder' and the ' Winterreise' : others-
such as the Ossian Songs, and Walter Scott's
poems — were made cyclic by Schubert's hand
ling of them. He did not join and weld together
2 Eeissmann, in his ' Gesch. d. deutsch. Liedes,' p. 220. compares the
handling of Goethe's songs by the Berlin composers with Sc
handling of them, and conclusively shows the great superiority 01
latter.
SONG.
the songs of a set, as Beethoven had done in
the cycle of ' An die feme Geliebte,' but bound
them to one another by community of spirit.
They can all be sung separately ; but the ' Mul-
lerlieder ' and ' Winterreise,' which tell a con
tinuous tale, lose much of their dramatic power
if they be executed otherwise than as a whole.
The publication known as the ' Schwanenge-
sang ' * contains some of Schubert's most beau
tiful songs, and among them his settings of
Heine's words. Heine appeared on the stage of
literature too late to have much to do with
Schubert ; his influence was more deeply felt by
Schumann : but Schubert at once recognised, as
did Schumann after him, the extreme import
ance of a musical accompaniment for his words.
Other poets for whom Schubert composed were
Klopstock, Matthison, Holty, Eiickert, Eellstab,
Craigher, Kosegarten, Schober, Muller, Schmidt,
etc. ; and some of these are perhaps indebted to
the composer for all the fame now left to them.
Many of Schubert's finest songs are strophical
in form, and resemble the best Volkslieder ; with
this difference however, that where the latter
rigidly adhered to the simple tonic and domi
nant harmony, Schubert uses the most varied
modulations. He was the equal of the com
posers of the Volkslieder in strict regard to the
accents of the verse, and their superior in at
tention to the meaning of the words. When he
wishes to mark an important word, he does so
by giving it two or three notes, or a striking
harmony; but rarely departs from the concise
strophical form. And he can raise a song with
the simplest melody to dramatic level by the
mere power of rhythm in the accompaniment.
But none knew better than Schubert that the
strophical form is not applicable to all poems,
and that some require different music for every
stanza.2 Without being ballads or narrative
poems, such songs range over too broad and
varied a field for the strophical form ; but through
all diversities they retain a true lyric unity,
and this unity as a whole, with variety in parts
and details, has been faithfully reproduced by
Schubert. Reissmann 3 has shown how he pre
served the unity by returning to the melody of
the first strophe as a refrain — as in ' Meine
Euh' ist hin' — or by keeping the same figure
in the accompaniment, as in ' Waldesnacht,' or
by simple development of the same melody in
each stanza. All the resources of Schubert's genius
are displayed in the durchkomponirtes Lied.
Enough, however, has been said to indicate his
supreme merits as a song-writer, and it is time to
turn to another name. In Mendelssohn the charac
teristics of the Berlin school of song- writers are
seen at their best. His songs exhibit all the care
and effort of that school to combine the volksthiim-
lichesform with a minutely faithful representation
of the words; but the object at which he aimed,
and which indeed he attained, tended sometimes
1 These, however, have no cyclical intention, but were put together
by the publisher after Schubert's death.
2 Of this kind is the ' durchkomponirtes Lied,' i.e. through-com
posed song, in which each stanza is differently treated.
3 See his ' Gesch. d. deutsch. Liedes,' pp. 220 to 242.
SONG.
627
to hamper the free play of his art. And with all
his comprehension and finished culture, Mendels
sohn could not, like Schubert,* surrender himself
completely to the poet whose words he was setting,
and compose with such identity of feeling that
words and music seem exactly made for each
other, and incapable of separate existence. Men
delssohn remained himself throughout, distinct
and apart. The poet's words^were not to him,
as they were to Schubert, the 'final cause of the
song; they were only an aid and incentive to
the composition of a song preconceived in his
own mind. In his songs, therefore, we miss
Schubert's variety ; and his influence upon the
Song in Germany has been limited. In Men
delssohn's op. 9, three songs especially deserve
mention — ' Wartend,' a true Romanze ; the
' Herbstlied,' concise in form, and expressive of
deep melancholy ; and ' Scheiden, ' which is a
song of tranquil beauty. The ' Friihlingslied '
of op. 19 reminds one of Berger, and 'Das erste
Veilchen ' is suggestive of Mozart. The ' Reise-
lied* inclines more to the scena-form, but is
marked by some of Mendelssohn's most charac
teristic modulations and transitions in the har
mony. The songs- which produced most effect
were, ' Auf Pliigeln des Gesanges ' of op. 34, and
' Wer hat dich, du schoner Wald ' of op. 47 ;
both volksthumlich in the best sense of the word,
melodious, pure, and refined, but withal bril
liant and striking. The most perfect, perhaps,
of his songs is the 'Venetian Gondellied,' op. 57,
without a blemish either in melody, accompani
ment, harmony, or rhythm. And the truest
Volkslied of modern birth is the little song ' Es
ist bestimmt in Gottes Rath.' All Mendelssohn's
other songs, with few exceptions, are simple and
pleasing. Take as an eminent instance, ' Lieb-
lingsplatzchen ' (op. 99, no. 3). Nevertheless,
with all their charms, his songs for one voice are
inferior to his part-songs, and indeed to his com
positions in other branches of music.
If any song-writer could dispute Schubert's
pre-eminence, it would be Robert Schumann.
His songs are the very breath of romantic poetry
elevated by austere thought. Where Schubert
is completely one with the poet, his exact alter
ego, Schumann is wont to be a little more than
the poet's counterpart or reflection. With scru
pulous art he reproduces all that runs in the
poet's mind, be it ever so subtle and delicate,
but permeates it with a deeper shade of mean
ing. This may be seen especially in his settings
of the poems of Heine, Reinick, Burns, Kerner,
Geibel, Chamisso, Riickert and Eichendorff. Of
these poets the last five were thoroughly ro
mantic writers, and exercised a great influence
on Schumann's kindred imagination. It was
stimulated into full activity by the supernatural
splendour and mystic vagueness of their con
ceptions. Visions of midnight scenes arise in
prompt obedience to the spell of Schumann's
4 It has been remarked that the mere playing through of a song of
Schubert enables a practised ear to recognise at once the poet to
whose words the music was written. It would be quite impossible to
do this with regard to Mendelssohn's songs.
Ss2
628
SONG.
music. It conjures up for eye and ear the dark
vault of the starry heavens, the solitudes of
haunted woods, the firefly's restless lamp, the
song of nightingales, the accents of human pas
sion idealised, and all else that makes the half-
real and the half-unreal world in which the
romantic spirit loves to dwell.
In Schumann's music to Eichendorff's words,
the accompaniments have even more importance
and beauty than the melodies; while the latter
seem only to suggest, the former unfold the sen-
tim'ent of the song. This is the case in the
' Friihlingsnacht,' the 'Scheme Fremde,' and the
' Waldesgesprach ' : and in another song of the
same opus, ' Ich karm wohl manchmal singen'
(Wehmuth), the melody is fully developed in
the accompaniment, and merely doubled in the
voice part. Of like kind is the work of Schu
mann's hand in the ' Liederreihe,' op. 35, con
taining 12 songs by Justinus Kerner, and in
Ru'ckert's ' Liebesfriihling,' op. 37 ; but Rtickert's
verse did not perhaps evoke in him so full a
measure of spontaneous melody as Eichendorff's
and Kerner's. The simplest and most melo
dious, and probably the best known of the
Rtickert collection, are Nos. 2, 4, and n ; and
they are by Frau Clara Schumann. Chamisso's
cycle, ' Frauenliebe und Leben,' op. 42, is de
scribed elsewhere in this Dictionary, and does
not require further notice here.1
To the poems of Reinick and Burns Schumann
imparts more of the Volkslied form ; but the
poet to whom his own nature most deeply re
sponded was Heine. There was not a thought
or feeling in his poetry which Schumann could
not apprehend and make his own. Whether
Heine be in a mood of subtle irony or bitter
mockery, of strong passion or delicate tenderness,
of rapturous joy or sternest sorrow, with equal
fidelity is he pourtrayed in the composer's music.
What Schubert was to Goethe, Schumann was
to Heine ; but the requirements of the two
poets were not the same. Goethe's thought is
ever expressed in clear and chiseled phrase ; but
it is a habit of Heine's to adumbrate his mean
ing, and leave whatever is wanting to be sup
plied by the reader's imagination. The com
poser who would adequately interpret him must,
therefore, have poetic fancy no less than a
mastery of his own art. This Schumann had,
and none of his songs rank higher than the
splendid cycle ' Dichterliebe,' from Heine's ' Buch
der Lieder,' which he dedicated to a great dra
matic singer, Wilhelmine Schroder -Devrient.
Their melodic treatment is declamatory — not in
recitative, but in perfectly clear-cut strophes.
The metrical accents of the verse are carefully
observed, and, if possible, still more attention is
bestowed on the accentuation of emphatic words.
That there may not be even the semblance of
a break or interruption in the continuous flow
of the phrases, the same rhythmical figure is
retained throughout the accompaniment, however
the harmony and the melody may change. As
a general rule, the instrumental part of Schu-
i See SCHUMANN, vol. Hi. p. 412.
SONG.
mann's songs is too important and too inde
pendent to be called an 'accompaniment'; it is
an integral factor in the interpretation of the
poem.2 Thus in the 'Dichterliebe' cycle, the
introductory and concluding symphonies to ' Im
wunderschonen Monat Mai/ ' Das ist ein Floten
und Geigen,' ' Die alten bosen Lieder,' and ' Am
leuchtenden Sommermorgen,' have all a closer
relation to the poem than to the music, and
seem to evolve from it a fuller significance than
it could ever have owed to the poet's own
unaided art. Further proof of the importance
of Schumann's accompaniments is afforded by
the peculiarity that in many of his songs the
voice part ends on a discord, and the real close
is assigned to the accompaniment.3 In 'Ich grolle
nicbt ' the accompaniment is occasionally used to
strengthen the accents, and discords also enhance
the grand effect ; only rarely does he allow the
independence of the accompaniment to remain in
abeyance throughout a whole song. In short, his
songs should be both played and sung by true
artists ; and the riper the intellect, the more
poetic the temperament of the artist, the better
will the execution be. No composer is more
worthy of thoughtful and finished execution than
Schumann ; together with Schubert in music,
and Goethe and Heine in literature, he has lifted
the Song to a higher pinnacle of excellence than
it ever reached before. Whether such work will
ever be surpassed, time alone can show.
We will here allude to another branch of
modern German Song, which has been handled
by the greatest composers, and comprises the
Ballade, the Romanze, and the Rhapsodic. In
the ordinary English sense, the ballad is a poem
simply descriptive of an event or chain of in
cidents ; it never pauses to moralise or express
emotion, but leaves the reader to gather senti
ment and reflections from bare narrative. But
the Ballade, as a form of German song, has some
other properties. Goethe says that it ought
always to have a tone of awe-inspiring mystery,
to fill the reader's mind with the presence of
supernatural powers, and subdue the soul to
submissive expectancy. The Romanze is of the
same class as the Ballade, but is generally of
more concise form, and by more direct references
to the feelings which its story evokes, approaches
nearer to the lyric song. As distinguished from
the Ballade and the Romanze, the Rhapsodic is
deficient in form, and its general structure is
loose and irregular. The first poet who wrote
such poems was Biirger; his example was fol
lowed by Goethe, Schiller, Uhland, and others :
and then the attention of composers was soon
caught. Inspired by Schiller, Zumsteeg first com
posed in this vein, and his work is interesting as
being the first of its kind ; but cultivated and well-
trained musician though he was, Zumsteeg had
too little imagination to handle the Ballade suc
cessfully. He generally adhered to the Romanze,
and ' Bleich flimmert in stiirmender Nacht ' is
2 See under SCHUMANN, vol. iii. p. 412.
3 See the end of ' Frauenliebe und Leben,' and of the exquis
2-part song ' Grossvater und Grossmutter.'
SONG.
a good specimen of his style. Sometimes he fused
the Romanze into the Rhapsodie by dramatising
incidents ; and to such efforts he owed most of
his contemporary popularity ; but it was not in
him to produce the true Ballade. Neither did
Reichardt or Zelter succeed any better in it.
They treated the ' Erlkonig ' as a Romanze, and
Schiller's Ballades, ' Ritter Toggenburg ' and ' Der
Handschuh,' as rhapsodies. And even Schubert,
for whom in youth this ballad poetry had a great
charm, even he was inclined to compose for
Balladen too much in Rhapsody-form. In some
of his longer pieces, such as 'Der Taucher,' 'Die
Biirgschaft/ ' Der Sanger,' where he is faithful
to the Ballade form, there are exquisite bits of
melody appositely introduced, and the accom
paniments are thoroughly dramatic; but the
general effect of the pieces is overlaid and
marred by a multiplicity of elaborate details.
When sung, therefore, they do not fulfil the ex
pectations awakened by silent study of them. To
the Romanze, Schubert gave the pure strophical
form, as, for instance, in Goethe's 'Heidenros-
lein.'
The founder of the true Ballade in music was
J. C. G. Lowe, who seems to have caught, as it
were instinctively, the exact tone and form it
required. His method was to compose a very
short, though fully rounded melody, for one or
two lines of a stanza, and then repeat it through
out the Ballade with only such alterations as
were demanded by the tenor of the narrative.
This method secures unity for the piece, but it
necessitates a richly developed accompaniment,
and calls upon the pianoforte to be the sole
contributor of dramatic colouring to the inci
dents. The simpler the metrical form of the
Ballade, the better will this treatment suit it.
Take, for example, Uhland's ' Der Wirthin Toch-
terlein.' All Lowe's music to it is developed
from the melody of the first line ; though other
resources are brought into play as the tragic
close draws near, the original idea is never lost
to view, and the character with which the ac
companiment began is preserved intact to the
end. Still more importance is given by Lowe
to the pianoforte part in the gloomy northern
Ballades, 'Herr Olaf and 'Der Mutter Geist.'
But his really popular Balladen are ' Heinrich
der Vogler,' ' Die Glocken zu Speier,' and ' Gold-
schmieds Tochterlein ' : in these the melodies
are fresh and genial, the accompaniments full of
characteristic expression, and stroke upon stroke
in the best Ballade style effect a vivid present
ment of animated scenes.
Mendelssohn never touched the Ballade form
for the solo voice ; and Schumann greatly pre
ferred the Romanze. To his subjective lyric
cast of mind the underlying thought was of more
concern than external facts. In his beautiful
music to Kerner's 'Stirb Lieb' und Freud,' he
treats the melody as a Romanze, and puts the
Ballade form into the accompaniment. On the
same plan are his 'Entflieh' mit mir,' 'Loreley,'
and ' Der arme Peter,' from Heine. ' Die Lowen-
braut ' and ' Bloudel's Lied ' are more developed
SONG.
629
Ballades ; but the most perfect of his Ballades is
'Die beiden Grenadiere,' op. 49. Its unity in
variety is admirable ; it stirs and moves the
heart, and its impressiveness is wonderfully aug
mented by the introduction of the Marseillaise.
When Schumann essayed to treat the Ballade
melodramatically he failed. Singing, in his
opinion, was a veil to the words ; whenever
therefore he wished them to have emphatic pro
minence, he left them to be spoken or ' declaim
ed,' and attempted to illustrate the narrative of
the song by the musical accompaniment. But
the Ballade form was too small and contracted
for this kind of treatment, which is better
suited to larger and more dramatic works. It is
a vexed question whether the repetition of the
melody for every verse, or its variation through
out, is the better structure for the Ballade ; the
former arrangement, at any rate, would seem best
adapted for short and simple pieces like Goethe's
'Der Fischer,' and the latter for lengthier ones.
If the melody be repeated for every verse in long
Balladen an impression of monotony is inevitably
created, and the necessarily varying aspects of the
poem are imperfectly represented in the music.1
The Song continues to hold in Germany the
high place to which it was raised by Schubert
and Schumann ; their traditions have been wor
thily sustained by their successors, the foremost
of whom are Robert Franz and Johannes Brahms.
Franz has devoted himself almost exclusively
to it.2 At first sight his work seems to be
similar to Schumann's, but on closer examina
tion it will be found to have marked character
istics of its own. There is no lack of melody
in his voice-parts, but the chief interest of his
songs generally lies in the accompaniments, which
are as finished as miniatures, though concealing
all traces of the labour expended on them.3 In
form and harmony Franz's songs are akin to
the old Volkslied and Kirchenlied. Their har
mony frequently recalls the old church scales;
and the peculiar sequential structure of the
melody (as, for instance, in his ' Zu Strassburg
an der Schanz,' op. 12, no. 2 ; 'Es klingte in der
Luft,' op. 13, no. 2, and 'Lieber Schatz, sei mir
wieder gut,' op. 26, no. 2), is so common with
him, that some critics have condemned it as a
mannerism.4 Most of his songs are strophical as
regards the voice-part, the richness and fulness
of the accompaniment growing with each suc
cessive stanza; or else the harmony is slightly
altered to suit the words, as in that subtle change
which occiirs in the second stanza of 'Des A-
bends,' op. 16, no. 4. Indeed the perfection of
truth with which Franz renders every word is
his highest merit. Like Schumann, he is wont
to leave much to the closing bars of the piano-
1 See Vischer's ' Aesthetik,' part iii. p. 996; and Eeissmann's 'Das
deutsche Lied,' p. 236.
2 'It was the result of an irresistible necessity,' wrote Franz to a
friend,' that I cultivated the Song-form almost exclusively, and wrote
very little else: I afterwards became convinced that my own par
ticular talent culminated in this form. On principle, therefore, I
have kept to this path, and should with difficulty be per
try my luck in any other.'
3 See Amuros, ' Bunte Blatter." p. "01.
4 Keissmann, ' Gesch. d. deutschen Liedes,' p. 279.
630
SONG.
forte part or to the whole accompaniment ; and
he has a further resemblance to Schumann in his
thoroughly lyrical temperament. His favourite
poets are writers of dreamy, quiet, pensive verse,
like Osterwald, Eichendorff, Lenau and Mirza
Schaffy ; but he has composed several songs by
Heine and Burns. There is not, perhaps, enough
of passion in his compositions to carry us away
in a transport of enthusiasm, but the refinement
of his poetic feeling, and the exquisite finish of
his workmanship compel our deliberate and cor
dial admiration.
Very different is the standpoint from which
Brahms approaches the Song. It has been said
of him that he ' defends his art-principles on the
ground of absolute music.' l And this criticism
may justly be applied to his songs. No modern
composer has ever studied less than he to render
each word with literal accuracy ; but while he
allows himself the amplest liberty in respect
of the letter of a song, he is scrupulously ob
servant of its spirit. If we listen, for instance,
to any of his fifteen romances from Tieck's
Magelone, or to his settings of Daumer's transla
tions of Oriental poems, we shall have no fault
to find with his interpretation of the words in the
music, as a whole, though in parts it may not
correspond to our own preconceived ideas. When
quite new to us his songs excite a certain sense
of strangeness, but the feeling quickly disappears
before the irresistible spell of his strong indivi
duality and concentrated force. To the form of
his songs he pays great heed. Some have the
same melody and harmony unchanged for every
verse, others have a succession of varied melo
dies for the voice and pianoforte part throughout.
His accompaniments are among the most difficult
and interesting that have ever been written,
and need to be studied with as much care as
any solo piece. They stand in the same relation
to the voice part as the pianoforte part stands
to the violin in a sonata written for those two
instruments. The accompaniment sometimes
leads, sometimes follows the voice ; and again at
other times pursues its own independent way.
This may be seen for instance in the fine im
passioned song 'Wie soil ich die Freude,' op. 33,
no. 6. The task of the singer in Brahms's songs
is as hard as that of the player. Sudden changes
of key and awkward intervals create difficulties
for the voice, and the very length of the songs
renders them fatiguing. But with a good singer
and a good pianist his songs cannot fail to produce
a remarkable effect, though Brahms himself would
never stoop to write for mere effect. He is far
too high and severe an artist to admit any false
or trivial matter into his work ; and his noble
songs may justly be reckoned among the greatest
treasures of modern music.
A composer whom it would be wrong to pass
by here without notice is Hugo Briickler. The
elaborate and refined accompaniments to his
songs remind us in some respects of Brahms.
And his songs of the ' Trompeter von Sakkingen'
set, and the posthumous ones edited by Jensen,
i See BRAQJIS, vol. i. p. 270.
SONG.
deserve a wider fame, for they are full of in
tellect and beauty. Jensen's own is a better-
known name. The melody of his songs is re
markably sweet, and his accompaniments are
both rich and interesting. Jensen, however, has
been the enemy of his own reputation bv con
stantly choosing to set words which had already
been dealt with by greater masters than himself.
Had he not thus challenged comparison, the
merits of his tender and delicate songs might
have been more fully recognised. Herzogenberg
belongs to the same group of composers. An
other group has worked more on the lines laid
down by Mendelssohn ; and it includes Cursch-
mann, Taubert, Franz Lachner, Dorn, Carl
Eckert, Julius Rietz, Reinecke, Josephine Lang,
and Fanny Hensel. The best work of these
writers is unpretending and simple : not that they
are themselves deficient in thought or culture,
but they attach such a paramount value to
purity of form and melodiousness combined, that
other high qualities of the song are sparingly
introduced.
Consideration is, likewise, due to the manner
in which the Song has been treated by Franz
Liszt. In such cases as his ' Kennst du das
Land?' and 'Ich weiss nicht was soil es be-
deuten,' he not only disregards the strophical
form, but ignores the metre and rhyme of the
verse until the poetry stiffens into prose. In
his endeavours to render every word effect
ively and dramatically, form, both of poetry and
music, escapes him. Some of these songs are
mere recitations ; or the melody is broken up
into short phrases with a few chords in the
accompaniment — as in ' Du bist wie eine Bluine,'
which contains striking modulations and abrupt
transitions. In fact, they produce an effect like
that of delicate but unfinished landscape sketches.
'Es muss ein Wunderbares sein' may be men
tioned as an example of more regular form. But
Liszt has not been allowed to remain alone in
his indifference to rule and form: his irregu
larities have been imitated by younger writers of
the so-called ' New German School.' When his
followers have had real talent and true poetic
feeling, as Cornelius2 and Goetz undoubtedly
had, considerable latitude in composition has been
shown to be compatible with very good work.
Nevertheless, the example set by Liszt is a
dangerous one, for, if the high artistic sense be
wanting, a scant regard for form very easily
degenerates into sheer chaos. If other names of
modern contributors to the song in Germany be
asked for, the following may be given : — Blume,
Brah-M-iiller, Bruch, Ehlert, Gernsheim, Hen-
schel, Hiller, Krigar, Lassen, Ludwig, Raff, Ra-
mann, Rheinberger, Rontgen, Semon, Urspruch,
and Volkmann; but the list is very far from
exhausted by the recital of these names. The
German Song has, moreover, been enriched by
foreigners, such as Niels Gade, Lindblad, Grieg,
Dvorak, and, especially, Rubinstein, to whose
songs some judges assign a place in the very first
rank.
2 See his ' Weihnachtslieder,' op. 3.
SONG.
Enough has now been said to show how
thoroughly and with what diversity of talent
the Song has been cultivated in Germany as a
branch of pure art. The torch has passed from
artist to artist ; and if the reverent devotion
with which it is still tended by German students
of music be an earnest and augury of what is
to come, it is not too much to hope that the
radiance of the flame may be as bright in the
future as it has been in the past.
The following works contain the best informa
tion on the history of the Song in Germany.
' Das musikalische Lied in geschichtlicher Entwicke-
lung ' ; Dr. K. C. Schneider. (3 vols.)
' Geschichte des deutschen Liedes im xviii Jahrhun-
dert ' ; Ernst 0. Lindner.
'Geschichte des deutachen Liedes'; August Reiss-
mann.
'Das deutsche Lied in seiner historischen Entwicke-
lunjz'; August Eeissmann.
' Die Hausmusik in Deutschland im 16ten, 17ten, and
18ten Jahrhundert ' ; Becker.
'Unsere volksthiimliche Lieder'; Hoffmann von Fal-
lersleben.
'Altdeutsches Liederbuch aus dem 12 bis zum 17 Jahr
hundert ' ; Franz M. B6hme.
'Der evangelische Kirchengesang '; Karl von Winter-
feld.
' Eohert Franz und das deutsche Volkslied ' ; August
Saran.
The collections of Volkslieder are too numerous to
name. But the reader will find at pp. 769-805 of Bdhme's
' Altdeutsches Liederbuch ' an ample catalogue with an
notations, entitled
' Quellen fur das deutsche Volkslied und seine Weisen
in alter und neuer Zeit.'
(Bohme includes both MS. and printed collections.)
SONG.
631
In conclusion, a few general reflections may be
added to the foregoing historical sketch. Vocal
music is probably the eldest branch of the art ;
but from the number of ancient dance-songs still
extant, and from the fact that dance-songs pre
ponderate in the music of nations whose musical
culture remains in a primitive stage, it is reason
able to conclude that vocal music was at first a
mere accessory of the dance. Choral singing at
religious and other festivals was also a practice
of very remote antiquity. Recitations by bards
commemorative of the exploits of heroes were a
further and distinct development of vocal music.
But the Song proper had no existence anterior to
the Troubadours ; their graceful lyrics and appro
priate rhythmical tunes were its earliest form.
In the sections of this article which relate to
France and Germany, attention has been called
to the reciprocal influences upon one another of
church music and secular music ; but it should
be noticed that the influence of the former was
not of unmixed advantage to the latter. The
scientific development of the Song was doubtless
advanced by the church composers, but their poly
phonic style injured it in other respects. Such
peculiarities of that style as constant repetitions
of the same words, and breaking up the verse
into fragmentary syllables, could only disfigure
the true Song, which requires an even adjustment
of words and music, without any sacrifice of one
to the other.
The Opera, on the other hand, was of immense
benefit to the Song by establishing the monodic
system, and thus teaching composers to attend
to the meaning of the words they set, with a
view to its reproduction in the music. But it
would be superfluous to dwell again on the value
of that ' expressive monodia ' which was intro
duced by Caccini in Italy, by Lawes in England,
and by Albert in Germany. [MONODIA, vol. ii.
3540
The reader will also have observed the neces
sary dependence of the Song upon poetry. Until
the poet supplies lyrics of adequate power and
beauty of form, the skill of the composer alone
cannot develope the full capacities of the Song.
When however poets and composers of the first
rank have worked together in mutual sympathy
and admiration, as did the German poets and
composers of Goethe's age, the Song has quickly
mounted to the loftiest heights of art. Again,
poets and composers are alike the children of
their times, and vividly reflect the dominant
emotions of the hour and the scene in which
they live. History colours every branch of Art,
and none more so than the Song, for it is the
first and simplest mode of giving expression to
strong feeling. Men naturally sing of that of
which their heads and hearts are full ; and thus
there is a close correspondence between great
historic events and the multitude of songs to
which they almost invariably give birth. From
wars have issued songs of victory, and other mar
tial odes ; from keen political struggles, songs or
satire; from religious reformations, majestic hymns
and chorales ; and from revolutions, impassioned
songs of liberty.
Time alone can produce men of genius and
breathe the inspiration of great events ; but even
with these reservations, there is ample scope for
the improvement of the Song in our own country
by talent and conscientious study. In wealth of
splendid poetry England has no superior ; and it
is singular that her great poets have not left
deeper marks upon the Song in music. No effect,
for instance, was produced on it by the group of
fine poets to which Byron and Shelley belonged,
comparable with the effect which the lyrics of
Goethe and his contemporaries had upon it in
Germany. Some would explain the anomaly by
the deficient culture of English musicians at most
periods of our history. Others might justly point
to the irregular accentuations of English verse as
presenting special difficulties to the composer.
But no single circumstance has been more in
jurious to English Song than our extravagant
and long-cherished preference for the Italian
opera. Of that indifference to the meaning of
words, in which it trained the English public,
enough has been said already and need not be
repeated here. Happily now there is a change
for the better, and English composers are at last
alive to the importance of the words.
No branch of music has been so freely handled
by inferior and unpractised composers as the
Song. It certainly does not require so accurate
a knowledge of formal principles as other kinds
of music; and thus seems to invite the inex
perienced hand. But in truth it demands,
and is worthy of the most serious study. The
simple 'guitar accompaniments' of other days no
632
SONG.
longer satisfy : full and elaborate accompaniments,
having a beauty of their own apart from the voice,
are now looked for. And although exception has
been taken to this development of the accom
paniment as a device to conceal poverty of melodic
invention, it cannot be gainsaid that the charm
and interest of a song are enhanced by a well
conceived and appropriate pianoforte part. Again,
no song can be really good without correct ac
centuation and emphasis ; but how few composers
seem to have studied this element of composition.
If the reader will only turn «'o the article on
ACCENT in this Dictionary, he will soon perceive
its immense importance.1 It is much to be
desired that we had in English some work
like M. Matthis Lussy's excellent Treatise on
Musical Expression.2 Clear rules will be found
there for the correspondence between the musical
rhythm and the verse rhythm, with examples
showing how the sense of the musical phrase
may be destroyed, if it be interrupted by a new
line of the verse, and how the verse in turn may
be marred by the interruption of rests or pauses
in the musical phrase. There the student may
learn why the strong and weak accents of the
music should coincide with the long and short
syllables of the verse, and the cases in which
departures from this rule are justifiable. There
also the proper relation of musical cadence to
grammatical punctuation, and many another point
in the art of composition, are illustrated by in
structive examples.
In connection with essential requisites of the
Song, much might be said about the sound of
the words in the voice part, about the incidence
of open words on certain notes, and careful com
binations of consonants. Much, too, of the duties
and responsibilities of the singer with regard to
accentuation and phrasing. But the discussion
of such topics would carry us far beyond the
history of the Song, and the space already tra
versed is more than wide enough.
To the deficiencies of this article no one can be
more alive than its writer ; and no one can more
acutely feel that the investigation offers a fitting
field for the highest faculties of musical research
and exposition. In the difficulties inevitable in
studying the Songs of those nations with whose
language she was not acquainted, and also in
procuring materials from abroad, the writer has
been much helped by friends, among whom she
would gratefully mention Mr. Mazzucato, Miss
Phillimore, M. Mathis Lussy, M. Gustave Chou-
quet, Mine. Blaze de Bury, Don Francesco
Asenjo Barbieri, Senor Bernardo Moreira de
S£, Mr. J. A. Kappey, Mr. Barclay Squire,
Mme. Lind-Goldschmidt, Mine, de NovikofF, and
Mr. Ealston. [A.H.W.]
SONGE D'UNE NUIT D'ETE, LE (A Mid
summer Night's Dream). A comic opera in
3 acts, a gross caricature of scenes in the life
of Queen Elizabeth and Shakspeare, with no rela-
1 Examples, for instance, are given from Schubert of declamatory
and interrogative accents.
2 Traite de 1'expressiou musicale, par M. Matthis Lussy. Paris,
1881.
SONNLEITHNER.
tion to his play. The words are by Rosier and
De Leuven, and the music by Ambroise Thomas,
and it was produced at the Opera Comique
April 20, 1850. [G.]
SONGS WITHOUT WORDS. The title of
certain well-known Pianoforte pieces of Mendels
sohn's, first published in English as 'Original
Melodies for the Pianoforte,' and in German as
' Lieder ohne Worte.' Of the latter title, 'Son^s
without words' is a translation. [See vol. ii.
P- I35-] [G.]
SONNAMBULA, LA. An Italian opera in
2 acts; libretto by Romani, music by Bellini
(written for Pasta and Rubini). Produced at
the Teatro Carcano, Milan, March 6, 1831; at
the King's Theatre, London, July 28, and at
Paris, Oct. 28 of the same year. At Drury
Lane (with Malibran) in English, under Italian
title, May i, 1833. [G.]
SONNLEITHNER, a noted Viennese family
of musical amateurs. The first, CHRISTOPH,
born May 28, 1734, at Szegedin, came to
Vienna at 2 years old and learned music from
his uncle Leopold Sonnleithner, choir-master of
a church in the suburbs. He also studied law,
became an advocate of some eminence, was em
ployed by Prince Esterhazy, arid thus came
into contact with Haydn. He composed several
symphonies, which his friend Von Kees (often
mentioned in Haydn's life) frequently played
with his orchestra ; and also 36 quartets, mostly
for the Emperor Joseph, who used to call him
his favourite composer. His church-compositions,
remarkable for purity of form and warmth of
feeling, have survived in the great ecclesiastical
institutions of Austria, and are still performed
at High Mass. Christoph Sonnleithner died
Dec. 25, 1786. His daughter, Anna, was the
mother of Grillparzer the poet. His son IGNAZ,
Doctor of Laws and professor of commercial
science (ennobled 1828) was an energetic member
of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde, and took
part in their concerts as principal bass-singer.
At the musical evenings held at his house, the
so-called 'Gundelhof,' in 1815-24, in which his
son, Leopold, took part as chorus-singer, Schu
bert's ' Prometheus,' though only with piano-ac
companiment, was first heard (July 24, 1816),
as were also the part-songs sdas Dorfchen'
(1819), 'Gesang der Geister iiber den Wassern'
(1821), the 23rd Psalm for female voices (1822).
The ' Erlkonig ' was sung there for the first time
on Dec. I, 1820, by Gymnich. Ignaz died in
1831. A second son, JOSEPH, born 1766, de
voted himself with success to literature and the
fine arts, and in 1799 was sent abroad by the
Emperor Franz to collect portraits and bio
graphies of savants and artists for his private
library. During this tour he made the acquaint
ance of Gerber and Zelter. In 1 804 he succeeded
Kotzebue as secretary of the court-theatres, and
as such had the entire management of both
houses till 1814, and also of that ' an der Wien
till 1807. He directed his endeavours principally
to German opera, and himself wrote or translated
SONNLEITHNER.
several librettos, including Beethoven's 'Leonore'
from the French of du Bouilly (the title of which
•was changed against the composer's wish to
'Fidelio') ;l 'Agnes Sorel' and others for Gyro-
wetz; 'Kaiser Hadrian,' and 'Die Weihe der
Zukunft' — a pi&ce d1 occasion for the visit of the
Allies — for Weigl ; ' Faniska ' for Cherubini ; an
oratorio, ' Die vier letzten Dinge,' for Eybler, and
numerous plays from various languages. He
was the first editor of the favourite pocket-book
'Aglaia,' and he also edited the Viennese
' Theater- Al man ach' for 1794, 95, and 96, which
contains valuable biographies, and articles on the
then condition of music in Vienna. For his
services as founder (1811) and honorary secre
tary of the ' Gesellschaft adeliger Frauen zur
Beforderung der Guten und Niitzlichen ' 2 he was
made a counsellor. With indefatigable energy
he next applied himself to founding (1813) the
Gesellschait der Musikfreunde, and continued
to act as its honorary secretary till his death,
devoting himself unremittingly to the welfare of
the society. Another institution in which he
took equal interest was the Conservator! um,
founded in 1 8 1 7.3 The formation of the archives,
and especially of the library, was almost entirely
his work, through his acquisition of Gerber's
literary remains in 1819, and his legacy of 41
MS. vols, in his own hand, full of valuable
materials for the history of music. He lived in
close friendship with Schubert and Grillparzer
up to his death, which took place Dec. 26, 1835.
He received the Danebrog Order, and honorary
diplomas from several musical societies. His
nephew, LEOPOLD EDLER VON SONNLEITHNER,
son of Ignaz, advocate and eminent amateur,
bora Nov. 15, 1797, was a great friend of the
sisters Frohlich, Schubert, Schwind the painter,
and Grillparzer. He took great care to preserve
Schubert's songs, and to introduce the composer
to the musical world, by publishing, with the
help of other friends, his ' Erlkonig ' and other
early songs, for the first time. The ' Erlkonig '
was sung by Gyinnich 4 at a soire'e of the Gesell
schaft der Musikfreunde Jan. 25, 1821, and for
the first time in public on the 7th of March
following, at the old Karnthnerthor theatre, by
Vogl with immense success. As member of the
Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde (from 1860 an
honorary one), Sonnleithner took an unwearied
interest in the concerns of the society, to whose
archives he left, among other papers, his highly
valuable notes on the operas produced, on con
certs, and other musical events in Vienna. His
numerous articles on music are scattered through
various periodicals. He was an intimate friend
of Otto Jahn's, and furnished him with much
valuable material for the life of Mozart, as Jahn
acknowledges in his preface. Leopold von Sonn
leithner was Bitter of the Order of the Iron
1 Hevised by Treitschke for the revival of the opera in 1814. [See
vol. i. p. 191.]
2 Society of ladies for the encouragement of the good and the
useful.
3 The first scheme of instruction was drawn up by Hofrath von
Mosel.
1 August von Gyinnich, an imperial official, and a. much esteemed
d.ed Oct. 6, it 21, aged 36.
SONS OF THE CLERGY.
633
Crown, an honorary member of the Gesellschaft
der Musikfreunde, and of the Musikvereine of
Salzburg, Innsbruck, etc. He died March 3, 1873,
and with him disappeared a most persevering
investigator and collector of facts connected with
the history of music in Vienna, a class which
daily becomes rarer, though its labours were
never of more value than in the present age of
new appearances and general progress. [C.F.P.]
SONS OF THE CLERGY, THE COLORA
TION OP THE. This venerable institution, which
was founded in 1655 by sons of clergymen, has
for its objects the assisting necessitous clergymen,
pensioning and assisting their widows and aged
single daughters, and educating, apprenticing,
and providing outfits for their children. To aid
in procuring funds for these purposes it holds an
annual festival (at no fixed date), consisting of a
choral service with a sermon, followed by a
dinner. The first sermon was preached in the
year of foundation at St. Paul's Cathedral by
the Rev. George Hall, D.D., Minister of St.
Botolph's, Aldersgate Street. That similar
meetings took place in following years is most
probable, but there are no means of proving it,
owing to the unfortunate destruction of the
early records of the institution by fire, in 1838.
We find, however, that in 1674 and 1675 ser
mons were preached at St. Michael's, Cornhill ;
that from 1676 to 1696 they were delivered at
Bow Church, Cheapside; and that from 1697
down to the present year (1883) they have been
invariably given at St. Paul's Cathedral. The as
sociation was incorporated by charter of Charles
II. in 1678. It was in 1698, according to the
records, that 'music' (i.e. orchestral accompani
ment to the service and anthems) was first in
troduced at the festivals. The compositions then
performed were Purcell's Te Deum and Jubilate
in D, composed for the celebration on St. Cecilia's
day, 1694, and these were annually repeated
until 1713, when Handel's Te Deum and Ju
bilate, composed on the Peace of Utrecht, were
given, from which time the two compositions
were alternately performed until 1743, when
both were laid aside in favour o.f the Te Deum
composed by Handel to celebrate the victory at
Dettingen, which continued to be annually per
formed (with the exception of one or two years
when Purcell's Te Deum was revived) until
1843, after which its performance was discon
tinued in consequence of the services of the
instrumental band being dispensed with in de
ference to the wishes of the Bishop of London
(Blomfield). Handel's overture to the oratorio
' Esther ' was almost invariably played as a pre
lude to the service from near the time of its
production in 1 7 20 until 1 843. Dr. W. Hayes was
at one time conductor of the festivals, and added
instrumental parts to the Old Hundredth Psalm
tune for their use. Dr. Boyce also was for many
years their conductor, and composed for them his
two anthems, 'Lord, Thou hast been our refuge,'
and 'Blessed is he that considereth the poor and
needy,' besides adding accompaniments to Pur
cell's Te Deum and Jubilate, and expanding
634
SONS OF THE CLERGY.
several movements in them. After 1843 the
services were for some fifteen or sixteen years
accompanied by the organ only, the choir being,
as before, very largely augmented. Since about
1860 orchestral accompaniment has again been
called into requisition; Evensong has taken the
place of Matins ; and modern compositions by
various living composers, often written expressly
for the festival, have been introduced. Handel's
immortal ' Hallelujah,' from Messiah, however,
still retains its place. The dinners are held in
the hall of the Merchant Taylors' Company. The
Corporation bestowed upon the objects of its
bounty in 1881 the large sum of £24,749, dis
tributed among 1513 recipients. [W.H.H.]
SONTAG, HENRIETTE, COUNTESS Rossi, was
born at Coblentz, May 13, 1805. Her father
was a good comedian, her mother an actress of
no ordinary merit, to whom the daughter, when
at the height of fame, continued to turn for
instruction. At six, Henriette made her first
public appearance, at the Darmstadt theatre, as
Salome, in Kauer's ' Donauweibchen.' Three
years later her mother, then a widow, settled at
Prague, where Weber was conductor at the
theatre. Here Henriette acted in juvenile parts,
and in 1815 was admitted, though under the
prescribed age, as a pupil to the Conservatoire
of the city. She studied singing under Bayer
and Frau Czegka, and when only 15 was suddenly
called upon to replace the prima donna at the
opera in the part of the Princess in Boieldieu's
' Jean de Paris.' Her precocity, appearance,
and vocal gifts, at once created a great impres
sion, but shortly afterwards her mother removed
with her to Vienna, where the next few years
were spent, Henriette Sontag singing both in
Italian and German opera, and deriving, accord
ing to her own statement, incalculable benefit
from the counsels and example of Mme. Main-
ville Fodor. Here Weber, in 1823, after hearing
her in the ' Donna del Lago,' went next day to
offer her the title-role in his ' Euryanthe/ whose
production, Oct. 25, was a triumph for Mile.
Sontag. Beethoven could not hear her, but ' How
did little Sontag sing ?' was his first question to
those who had been at the performance. When,
in 1824, his Qth Symphony and Mass in D were
produced, it was she who sustained the diffi
cult and ungrateful soprano part. She was next
engaged at Leipzig, and then for Berlin, making
her first appearance at the Konigstadt theatre,
August 3, 1825, as Isabella in the 'Italiana in
Algieri.'
Henceforward her career was one unbroken
triumph. She made her d&ut in Paris in June
1826, as Rosina in the 'Barbiere,' and became a
favourite at once. Her introduction of Rode's
air and variations created a furore. She sang
also in the 'Donna del Lago' and 'Italiana in
Algieri,' and returned to Germany in July, with
heightened prestige. Everywhere her beauty,
charming voice, and exquisite vocalisation com
bined to excite an admiration amounting to
frenzy. At Gottingen her post-chaise was thrown
into the river by the ardent crowd, no mortal
SONTAG.
being counted worthy to make use of it after
her. Even Ludwig Borne, after commenting
humorously on the extravagance of the public,
confesses to have yielded in his turn to the pre
vailing infatuation. Her figure was slender and
mignonne, her hair between auburn and blonde
her eyes large, and her features delicate. Her
voice, a soprano of clear and pleasing quality,
was specially good in the upper register, reaching
the E in alt with facility, and in perfection of
execution she seems to have been unsurpassed
by any singer of her time. But she was deficient
in dramatic power, and only appeared to the
highest advantage in works of a light and placid
style. On her return to Paris, in January 1828,
she essayed parts of a different order, such as
Donna Anna and Semiramide, with success, but
in passion and emotion never rose to the distinc
tion she attained as a songstress.
In England she appeared first on April 19, 1828,
at the King's Theatre, as Rosina, and met with a
most flattering reception, sharing with Mali bran
the honours of that and the succeeding season.
The story of the coolness existing between the
two, and of how, after singing together the duet
from 'Semiramide' at a concert, mutual admira
tion transformed their estrangement into warm
friendship, is well known. Mile. Sontag ap
peared here in other rdles, and her artistic fame
was enhanced by her popularity in society.
At Berlin, Mile. Sontag had formed the ac
quaintance of Count Rossi, then in the diplomatic
service of Sardinia. An attachment sprang up
between them and was followed by a secret
marriage. It was feared that the young diplo-
mate's future might be compromised were he to
acknowledge an artiste of low birth as his wife.
But after a time Count Rossi's efforts to procure
Court sanction to his union were successful— the
King of Prussia bestowed a patent of nobility on
the lady, who henceforth appeared in documents
as nie de Launstein, and she definitely bade fare
well to artistic life. As Countess Rossi she ac
companied her husband to the Hague, where be
was representative of the Sardinian Court. Oc
casionally she would sing for public charities, in
concerts or oratorio — a style in which she is said
to have been unrivalled ; still, for nearly half
•her lifetime she remained lost to the musical
public, following the career of her husband at the
courts of Holland, Germany, and Russia. As to
her domestic felicity and the character of her
husband, we quote the positive testimony of her
brother, Carl Sontag, 'Rossi made my sister
happy, in the truest sense of the word. Up to
the day of her death they loved each other as
on their wedding-day ! ' But the disorders of
1847-48 had impaired their fortunes, and she
was tempted to return to the opera. It was
notified to Rossi that he might retain his am
bassador's post, if he would formally separate
from his wife— on the tacit understanding that
so soon as her operatic career was concluded i
should be allowed to return to him. This h
however at once refused, and resigned his post,
though remaining on a friendly footing with the
SONTAG.
Court. Lumley, then manager of Her Majesty's
Theatre, having offered the Countess Rossi £6000
for six months, it was accepted, and in July 1849
her reappearance in London as ' Linda ' was an
nounced. The curiosity excited was extreme.
Her voice and charms were unimpaired, and the
unanimous opinion seems to have been that,
in the words of Adolph Adam, she now united
to youth and freshness the qualities of a finished
artist. Her former deficiencies were in some
measure compensated for by study and less
girlish appearance. As Amina, though Jenny
Lind was fresh in the public memory, she was
rapturously received, as also in Desdemona, and
Susanna in the ' Nozze,' one of her favourite
parts, and pronounced by a German critic the
most perfect thing he had seen on any stage.
Her extraordinary preservation of her powers
was partly due no doubt to long exemption from
the wear and tear of incessant public singing,
but Sontag was always extremely careful of
her voice, discarding any r&le that did not lie
well within her register. Thus, in an early
contract at Berlin, she expressly stipulates that
she shall not be bound to sing in the operas of
Spontini !
After a tour in the English provinces in the
winter of 1849, she went to Paris, where a suc
cessful series of concerts, also under Lumley's
management, preceded in the spring of 1850 her
reappearance at Her Majesty's to win fresh
laurels as Norina in ' Don Pasquale,' Elvira in
the 'Puritani,' and Miranda in Hale"vy's new
opera 'La Tempesta.' As Zerlina and the
Tiglia del Eeggimento,' she appeared for the
first time, and with pre-eminent success. In the
autumn of 1850 she sang in Italian opera at
Paris, Lumley again being director of the com
pany. During this season Alary's ' Tre Nozze '
was produced, and the polka-duet between Sontag
and Lablache never failed to send the public into
ecstasies. It was brought out in London in 185 r,
with similar results. During this season, Mme.
Sontag's last in London, she sang in a round of
her favourite parts, and in the production of
'I/Enfant Prodigue.'
In Germany, wherever she went she carried
all before her. At a concert at Munich she was
expressly requested to stay to hear the last piece.
It proved to be a 'Huldigungs Chor ' — verses com
posed expressly in her honour by the Crown
Prince, and set to music by Lachner.
In 1852 Mme. Sontag received offers from
the United States, which tempted her thither
with her husband in the autumn. The results
were brilliant. Her voice was strengthened by
the climate, and at this time she could sing in
'Lucrezia Borgia' and the 'Figlia del Reggi-
mento' on a single evening without over-fatigue!
Her last appearance was made in ' Lucrezia ' at
Mexico, in 1854. She was attacked by cholera,
and on June 17 a brief illness cut short a life
of unchequered prosperity.
Berlioz, remarking on the fact that Sontag
had less to suffer than other equally famous
singers from hostile criticism and party spirit,
SOPEANO.
635
ascribes it to her having united so many favourite
qualities — sweetness unsurpassed, fabulous agi
lity, perfect intonation, and expression. In this
last her scope was limited, and warranted Cata-
lani's mot, ' Elle est la premiere dans son genre,
mais son genre n'est pas le premier.' Her success
in certain pathetic rdles must be attributed to
the charm of her singing. She used to say, 'A
Donna Anna over her father's corpse, a Pamina
in the air "Ach ich fiihl's," who cannot move
the public to tears, have no idea of Mozart.' By
her delivery of the short phrase alone, ' Tamino,
halt ! ich muss ihn sehn,' sung by Pamina be
hind the scenes, she could rouse the house to the
stormiest applause. She was a thorough and
conscientious artist, and her style won her the
special favour of eminent musicians. Mendels
sohn entertained the highest admiration for her,
and she obtained a like tribute of praise from
connoisseurs in every country. It fell to her lot
to achieve an international popularity and fame
never before accorded to a German singer. [B.T.]
SOPRANO. The human voice of the highest
pitch or range. Its peculiar clef (called ~
the Soprano Clef) is the C-clef upon the lifijEEE
first line of our treble stave ; but in jnf
modern times this has been almost superseded
by the treble or G-clef on the second line.
The word ' Soprano ' is etymologically synony
mous with 'Sovrano,' the head, chief, or highest.
In the present day the soprano is the highest
natural voice of women and boys — the artificial
soprani belonging to the past ; and in women it
is, perhaps, the voice which varies most in com
pass. [See SINGING.] That of AGUJARI is the
highest and most extended on record, and that of
TITJENS one of the largest in quality and power.
But, as with other voices, it is not a question of
compass alone, but of timbre. Many mezzo-
soprani can sing higher notes than many soprani ;
but there is a middle to every voice, which, as a
rule, it is not difficult to find, and about this the
tessitura (literally texture) of the music and the
practice should be woven. Tessitura is the techni
cal term used by the Italians to signify the notes or
part of the scale upon which music is framed, and
though, as said above, a mezzo-soprano may sing
higher notes than a soprano, it would generally be
found distressing to the former voice to dwell upon
that part of the scale upon which even a limited
soprano part is written. No one can say that F
on the line is a high note for a soprano, and yet
'Voi che sapete ' (which never goes above F) is
found a trying song by some limited soprani, the
tessitura being high. [See TESSITURA.] Faustina,
Cuzzoni, Mingotti, Anastasia Robinson, Mara,
Banti, Catalani, Mrs. Billington, and Miss Paton
are some of the principal soprani of bygone days,
possessing exceptionally good voices ; and those
of Grisi, Clara Novello, Titjens, and Adelina Patti,
may perhaps be considered the four best natural
soprano voices of modern times. Some great
singers have depended more upon their artistic
excellence than upon their voices — Pasta and
Persiani for example. Jenny Lind made her
voice what it was. Massive soprano voices are
SOPKANO.
found amongst the Germans, of which Madame
Iludersdorff was an instance, but they are chiefly
adapted to declamatory singing. A striking ex
ample of the soprano leggiero, the exact opposite
of the last-mentioned voice, was Madame Stock-
liausen, who was very popular on account of the
musical quality of her voice and the faultless
manner of her execution. But she was unim-
passioned, and though there was a great charm
about her rendering of her native Swiss airs, her
performance of such songs as Meyerbeer's 'Idole
de ma vie' (Robert le Diable) was almost that of
a musical box. The great artificial soprani of the
1 7th, 1 8th, and the early part of the present
centuries were Ferri, Pasqualini, 1Nicolini (after-
wards changing to contralto), Bernacchi, Caffa-
relli, and Farinelli (the two greatest), Carestini,
Gizzi ell o, G u ard ucci, A prile . Millico, Pacchiero t ti,
Crescentini, Velluti, etc. Pergetti was the last
of the tribe who sang in England.
There are some high Mezzo-soprani that, during
the years of youth and vigour, contrive to sing
soprano music, but the voice will not continue
to bear the strain, and the result, after a time,
baneful alike to singer and hearer, is extreme
harshness in the upper notes, with frequent false
intonation, hollowness or emptiness of the
middle of the voice, and flaccid gruffness upon
the lower notes, and in many cases early total
failure of the vocal powers. The low mezzo-
soprano, which might be called mezzo-contralto,
can generally make a shift to sing contralto
music, but the voice lacks the heavy lower notes
necessary to give the music its full effect. It is
in the large spaces of our modern concert-halls
that these deficiencies make themselves most felt.
The true mezzo-soprano, not forced out
of its proper limit, is a very fine type of
voice. The mezzo-soprano clef, now dis
used, is the C-clef on the second line. [H.C.D.]
SOEDINI, Mutes2 or Dampers (Fr. Sourdine ;
Ger. Ddmpfer. The term occurs in Senza sor
dini; Con sordini). The violin Sordino has been
described and figured under MUTE, and some
further remarks are given below.
In the pianoforte the contrivance is called in
English the damper. The first pianofortes, as
we find Cristofori's and Silbermann's, were made
without stops. In course of time a practice
common with the harpsichord was followed in
the pianoforte, and led the way to the now in
dispensable pedals.
The first stops were used to raise the dampers ;
and by two brass knobs on the player's left hand
the dampers could be taken entirely off the
strings in two divisions, bass and treble. C. P.
E. Bach, in his ' Versuch,' makes few references
to the pianoforte ; but in the edition of 1797 he
remarks (p. 268) that the undamped register of
the Fortepiano is the most agreeable, and that,
with due care, it is the most charming of keyed
instruments for improvising ('fantasiren'). The
1 Erroneously classed amongst early tenors under SINGING.
2 It will be noticed that the metaphors at the root of the Italian
and English terms are deafness in the one case and dumbness in the
other.
SORDINI.
higher treble of the piano is not now damped.
These short strings vibrate in unison with the
overtones of deeper notes, and, as a distinguished
pianoforte-maker has said, give life to the whole
instrument.3 The musical terms ' Senza sordini'
and ' Con sordini ' applied to the damper-stops
were used exclusively by Beethoven in his earlier
sonatas. He did not use the now familiar 'Fed.'
or ' Pedal,' because the pedal was of recent intro
duction, and was less commonly employed than
the stops, which every little square piano then
had. The 'Genouilliere' or knee-pedal replaced
the damper stops in the G-erman Grands. For
the Italian words signifying Without and With
dampers the signs $ and % were substituted
by Steibelt, and eventually became fixed as the
constant equivalents. The oldest dated so«uare
piano existing, one of Zumpe's of 1766, has the
damper stops ; as to the Genouilliere, Mozart tells
us (letter, Oct. 1777) how Stein had one in his
improved Grand, and M. Mahillon's Stein of i j8o
or thereabouts, accordingly has one. There is
one in Mozart's Walther Grand at Salzburg, and
in each of the two Huhn (Berlin) Grands of
1790, or earlier, preserved at Potsdam. The
action of the Genouilliere consists of two levers
which descend a little below the key-bottom of
the piano, and meet opposite the knees of the
player, who pressing the levers together, by an
upward thrust moves a bar which takes the
whole of the dampers off the strings.
Contemporaneously with the employment of
the Genouilliere was that of the piano stop
(German 'Harfenzug' Fr. 'Celeste'), afterwards
transferred, like the dampers, to a pedal. An
interesting anonymous Louis Quinze square piano
belonging to the painter M. Gosselin of Brussels,
has this Celeste as a stop. Its origin is clearly
the harp-stop of the harpsichord, the pieces of
leather being turned over so as to be interposed
between the hammers and the strings.4
A note of directions for the use of the pedals
prefixed to Steibelt's three sonatas, op. 35, gives
an approximate date to the use of the pedals be
coming recognised, and put under the composer's
direction, instead of being left entirely to the
fancy of the player. He says: 'The Author
wishing to make more Variety on the Piano Forte
finds it necessary to make use of the Pedals, by
which alone the tones can be united, but it re
quires to use them with care, without which, in
goino- from one chord to another, Discord and
Confusion, would result. Hereafter the Author
in all his Compositions will make use of the
following signs to denote the Pedals.
$• The Pedal which raises the dampers.
* The Piano Pedal.
4, To take the foot off the Pedal that was
used before.'
3 Even in Virdung. A.D. 1511. we find the practice of Caving sym
pathetic strings in the clavichords ; as he says to stren
resonance. ^.^ PEDALS we attributed the introduction onhe
•Celeste' to Sebastian Erard ; but as now named •we a
to place this kind of pedal earlier, since it was in such g«
in 18th-century Germanpianos, the ideas of which, whether '
German or French, Erard appears at first to have adoptei
basis for his experiments.
SORDINI.
Steibelt's op. 35 was published in 1799, by
Longman, Clement! & Co.1
The leather was applied in one length to mute
the strings more effectually, and was then called
in French ' Sourdine.' John Broadwood was the
first to put the 'sordin' — as the term occurs in
his patent of 1783 — upon a foot pedal; he put
the dampers upon a pedal at the same time, and
for fifty years the pedal-foot was cloven, to divide
the dampers into bass and treble sections, as the
stops had previously been divided for the same
purpose. The use of the pianissimo mute was
indicated by the Italian word 'Sordino.' Mr.
Franklin Taylor has pointed out to the writer the
use of this term in the sense of a mute as late as
Thalberg's op. 41 (Ashdown's edition) : —
SORDINI.
637
-9 — i «
« I m i » i B
«-H -»-+->-^l I • \-9-9t-+-9-
R-» — |-» — I • • >• — I — t • I
loco
'I 1~T -1
g .— n
• • —
•^ •
^ II
1 <'f— —
s^ •
f^\ *
s^f — J
1 ^-
The ' Verschiebung,' or shifting pedal, for shift
ing the hammep first to two strings and then
to one (una corda), ultimately gained the day
over the muted pedals or stops. The effect of
the 'una corda' was charming, and is expressly
indicated by Beethoven in his G major Concerto,
in op. 106, etc. The pp and ppp soft pedal in
course of time shared the fate of the divided
damper pedal : such refinements were banished
as being of small service in large rooms. In the
six-pedal Viennese Grand of Nanette Stein at
Windsor Castle, the 'Verschiebung' and ' Harfen-
zug' co-exist.2 The latter has of late years
1 Steibelt gives a description of the pedals, with his signs for them.
In his ' MtHhode de Piano,' first published by Janet, Paris, 1805. He
names Clementi, Dussek and Cramer as having adopted his signs.
They differ from and are better than Adam's (Methode de Piano du
Conservatoire), also published in Paris, 1802. Steibelt calls the ' una
corda ' celeste.
2 The remaining pedals in Nanette Stein's Grand are the 'Fagotzug,'
' which a piece of card or stiff paper is brought into partial contact
with the strings, and the ' Janissary ' drum and triangle. See STEIN.
again come forward, at first in oblique pianos
that could not shift, and since more generally j
and has, to a certain extent, gained the favour
of amateurs. The material used is cloth or
felt- [A.J.H.]
Most instruments are capable of having their
tone dulled for particular effects, and this is
accomplished by partially preventing the vibra
tions by the interposition of a foreign substance.
Violins are muted either by placing a wooden
or brass instrument [see MUTE] upon the bridge,
or by slipping a coin or strip of horn between
the strings above the bridge. These two means
produce different results. The brass mute is so
heavy as to entirely extinguish the tone, espe
cially of a small or inferior violin, while the strip
of horn sometimes produces scarcely any effect
at all. A penny squeezed between the bridge
and tailpiece produces just the right effect.
The brass mute should be reserved as a special
effect of itself. On the other hand, the mutes
for the Cello and Double-bass are rarely made
heavy enough, and this has given rise to the
erroneous idea (see Prout's Treatise on Instru
mentation, pp. 23, 28) that mutes do not produce
much effect on these instruments. The double-
bass mutes used by the present writer are of
brass, and weigh rather over a pound. They
produce a beautiful veiled tone, and it is pro
bable that larger patterned basses would bear
even a heavier mute.
Brass instruments can be muted in three ways.
The first and most effective is — as in 'stopping'
a horn — the introduction of the closed hand or a
rolled-up handkerchief into the bell. This raises
the pitch of the instrument, but produces a good
muffled tone. The second way is by inserting a
pear-shaped piece of wood covered with leather
into the bell, which it fits, small studs allowing
a portion of the wind to pass. The tone thus
produced is thin, nasal, and unpleasing. Wagner
has frequently used it (Siegfried, Acts I and 2 ;
Meistersinger, last scene) as a comic effect, imi
tating the sound of a toy-trumpet. The third
means produces a very distant-sounding, but still
more nasal quality of tone, and is known to
orchestral players as the ' coffee-pot effect.' It
is obtained by allowing the sound to issue from
the small end of a small double cone of metal,
styled the 'echo attachment.' A good cornet
player can, by these three devices, produce on
his instrument exact imitations of the horn, oboe,
and bagpipe.
Trombones, Tubas, etc., can also be muted in
the same way, though we are not aware of any
instance in orchestral music. The effect of an
entire military band con sordini would be very
curious and striking, but almost impracticable,
owing to the difficulty of keeping in tune.
It has been frequently stated that 'Berlioz
muted the Clarinet by enveloping the bell in a
bag of chamois leather,' and that ' The Oboes in
Handel's time were muted by placing a ball of
cotton wool in the bell.' But these devices only
affect the bottom note of the instrument, as all
others issue from the holes and not from the bell
638
SORDINI.
at all. The writer has tried the effect of en
veloping the entire instrument in a bag of wash-
leather, from which the mouthpiece alone
emerges. A slit on each side admits the hands
of the player, and a stifled tone is the result,
not, however, of sufficiently striking peculiarity
to warrant its use as a special effect ; while the
quick rise of temperature inside the bag throws
the instrument out of tune directly.
The laying of any substance, even a handker
chief, on the kettledrums is sufficient to check
the vibrations and produce a muffled effect. In
the ' Dead March' the big drum is usually beaten
enveloped in its cover.
Various means have been used to obtain sour
dine effects from voices. Berlioz, like Gossec
before him [see vol. i. 6iia], has employed the
device of a chorus in a room behind the orchestra
(' L'Enfance du Christ') and the interposition of
a veil, or curtain ('Lelio'). He has also sug
gested that the chorus should hold their music
before their mouths, or should sing with their
backs to the audience. One important effect,
however, deserves more attention than it has
received. French composers, especially Gounod,
are fond of that striking device called & bouche
fermte. The choir hums an accompaniment with
out words, keeping the mouth quite, or nearly,
closed. But composers have lost sight of the
fact that several totally distinct effects may be
thus produced, and they usually confuse the
matter still more by writing the sound 'A-a-a'
underneath the music — just the very sound which
can not possibly be produced by a closed mouth.
The effect would be better designated by writing
the exact sound intended, and consequently the
exact position of the mouth. For instance, by
closing the lips entirely, the sound of *n' or 'm'
may be hummed through the nose. By opening
the lips slightly either of the vowel-sounds may
be used, each making a distinct effect. Comical
and quite original effects might be got by sustain
ing such sounds as ' z-z ' (buzzed), 'r-r ' (rattled),
or 'u" (pursing up the lips). These, however, do
not properly belong to our subject.
The concealed orchestra at Bayreuth is a spe
cimen of a whole orchestra with the tone veiled
and covered. Opinions differ as to the satis
factory result of this plan. However good for
Wagner's heavy scoring it would probably spoil
such instrumentation as that of Gounod or Ber
lioz. [F.C.]
SORT A, DE, JULES DIAZ, a remarkable baritone
singer, was born of Jewish Portuguese parents at
Bourdeaux, April 28, 1843. His musical ability
showed itself early, and at 13 he already sang
solos. Though a member, and a very active
member, of a wine house in his native city, and
therefore strictly an ama.teur, M. de Soria is as
widely known as if he were a professional musi
cian, which he might well have been had he
chosen to forsake commerce for music. He has
chosen to combine both. He has travelled over
the greater part of Europe, and has produced
the same remarkable effect everywhere from the
singular beauty of his voice, and the exquisite
SORIANO-FUERTES.
taste and tact with which he manages it. In
Rome, Venice, Vienna, Paris, St. Petersburg,
and Athens (where he assisted in founding the
Conservatoire), and in other cities of the Con
tinent he is well known in the best and highest
musical circles. The same in London, which
he visited in 1867 and 1872, and where he
made many and lasting Mends. Gounod, Fell-
cien David, Massenet, Lenepveu, Faure and
others, have written pieces expressly for him,
and his interpretations of the songs of Schubert
and Schumann are worthy of all praise. He
has appeared also on the boards both at Paris
and Nice with success. His voice is a high bari
tone, and his management of it peculiarly good
and effective. [G-.]
SORIANO (or SURIANO, or SURTANI),
FRANCESCO, was born at Rome in 1549, and
at the age of 15 entered the choir at S. John
Lateran. After the breaking of his voice he
became a pupil of Montanari, then of G. M.
Nanini, and lastly of Palestrina. After this his
fame went on always increasing. In 1581 we
find him Maestro di cappella at S. Ludovico dei
Francesi; in 1587 at S.Maria Maggiore; in 1599
at S. John Lateran. He returned however to
S. Maria Maggiore, and in 1603 made his final
step to the head of the choir of S. Peter's. He
died in Jan. 1620, and was buried at S. Maria
Maggiore. Soriano published his first work in
1581, a book of madrigals k 5. This was fol
lowed by a second in 1592 ; by two books a 4,
1 60 1, 1602 ; by a book of masses for 4, 5 and 6
voices, 1609; and by a collection of no canons
on 'Ave Maris Stella.' His last work was a
Magnificat and Passione a 4, Rome 1619, con
taining his portrait. A complete list of his works
is given in Kiesewetter's Baini, p. 233. He
will be remembered longest for having arranged
Palestrina's Missa Papse Marcelli for 8 voices.
The Passion already mentioned, a Magnificat
and 5 Antiphons, are included in Proske's Mu-
SICA DIVINA, vols. iii. and iv., and 2 Masses in
the ' Selectus novus.'
SORIANO-FUERTES, MARIANO, a Spanish
composer and litterateur, according to Riemann
was the son of a musician, and so determined in
his pursuit of music that though forced into a
cavalry regiment he left it for the musical career.
His works were many, and in many spheres ; in
1841 he founded a periodical 'Iberia musical y
literaria'; in 1843 became teacher in the Con
servatoire at Madrid; in 1844 director of the
Lyceums at Cordova, Seville, and Cadiz; con
ductor of the opera at Seville, Cadiz, and (1852)
at Barcelona, where he founded the 'Gaceta
Musical Barcelonesa ' in 1 860. During this period
he wrote several ' Zarguelas ' or operettas ; but
it is from his literary works that he will derive
his chief fame — 'MusicaArabo-Espanola' (1853);
'History of Spanish music from the Phoenicians
down to 1850' (4 vols. 1855-59); ' Memoir on the
Choral Societies of Spain,' and ' Spain, artistic
and industrial in the Exposition of 1867.' Soriano
died at Madrid in April 1880. |y-J
SOSTENUTO.
SOSTENUTO, 'sustained'; a direction which
has of late corne to be used with a considerable
degree of ambiguity. It originally signified that
the notes were to be held for their full value, and
was thus equivalent to tenuto ; but in music of the
modern ' romantic ' school it very often has the
same meaning as meno mosso, or something be
tween that and ritenuto — i.e. the passage so
marked is to be played at a uniform rate of
decreased speed until the words a tempo occur.
No precise rule can be given for its interpreta
tion, as its use varies with different masters, and
even in different works by the same master. One
of the most remarkable instances of its use is
in the Introduction to Beethoven's Symphony
No. 7, which is marked Poco sostenuto only, with
no direction as to speed. The ' Meeresstille' in
his op. 112 is Sostenuto, the Preludium before
the Benedictus in the Mass in D is Sostenuto ma
non troppo, and the Kyrie of the same work
Assai sostenuto. So is the Introduction to the
A minor Quartet, op. 132. Here we have all the
varieties. [J.A.F.M.]
SOSTINENTE PIANOFORTE. The term
implies a pianoforte capable of producing a sus
tained sound, such as that of the organ, har
monium, or violin. It must however be borne
in mind that by giving the pianoforte this
power of sustaining sound, the special character
of the instrument is transformed, and in point of
fact the ' sostinente ' pianoforte is a pianoforte
in name only. It is the rapid diminution of the
fugitive tone that raises the ordinary pianoforte
to that ideal terrain wherein it finds one of its
chief excellences, the prerogative of freedom
from cloying ; the emotion of the hearer entering
actively into the appreciation of its unsubstantial
tones, while it is rather taken captive by the more
material tones of sostinente instruments. Under
the head of PIANO - VIOLIN the Hurdy Gurdy is
referred to as the germ of sostinente keyed-
instruments ; and allied to the harpsichord we
next meet with it in the Gambenwerk of Hans
Haydn of Nuremberg, dating about 1610. The
Lyrichord, patented by Roger Plenius in London
in 1741, demands notice as being a harpsichord
strung with wire and catgut, made on the sosti
nente principle, and actuated by moving wheels
instead of the usual quills, so that the bow of the
violin and the organ were imitated. There is no
specification to the patent, but a magazine article
°f J755> in the possession of the writer, gives
a drawing and complete description of the in
strument, which was otherwise remarkable for
sustaining power by screws, springs, and balanced
tension weights for tuning ; for silver covering to
the bass strings, like the largest 'Bass-violins';
for the use of iron to counteract the greater pull
of the octave-strings (in the drawing there are
apparently four iron bars connecting the wrest-
plank and soundboard, thus anticipating the later
introduction of steel arches in grand pianofortes
for similar service) ; and lastly for the Swell ob
tained by dividing the lid or cover into two parts,
one of which is moveable up and down by means
of a pedal governed by the foot of the player,
SOTO.
639
a practice followed by Kirlcman in his harpsi
chords, and perhaps by Shudi, until he introduced,
about 1766, his important improvement of the
Venetian Swell. Another patent of Plenius, in
1745, added the 'Welch harp,' or buff stop (in
his patent by a pedal), to the instrument. We
have thus dwelt upon the Lyrichord because as
an ingenious combination of inventions its im
portance cannot be gainsaid.1 Another 'Sosti
nente ' harpsichord was the ' Celestina ' of Adam
Walker, patented in London in 1772. An
important ' Sostinente ' instrument was the ' Cla-
viol' or 'Finger-keyed Viol,' the invention of
Dr. John Isaac Hawkins of Bordertown, New
Jersey, U. S. A., an Englishman by birth, who
also invented the ever-pointed pencil, and, more
to our purpose, the real upright pianoforte, which,
in the article PIANOFORTE, we have erroneously
attributed to his father, Isaac Hawkins, who we
find merely patented the invention for his son in
London in iSoo.2 This upright piano (called
' portable grand ') and the ' Claviol,' which was
in form like a cabinet piano, with ringbow
mechanism for the sostiuente, were introduced to
the public in a concert at Philadelphia, by the
inventor, June 21, 1802. There is a description
of the Claviol in Rees's Cyclopaedia, 1819, and
also in the Mechanic's Magazine for 1845, no.
1150, p. 123. About Hawkins himself there
are interesting particulars in Scribner's Magazine
(A.D. 1880), in an article on 'Bordertown and
the Bonapartes.' Hawkins was in England in
1813 and 14, exhibiting his Claviol, and in the
latter year complained of his idea being appro
priated by others through the expiration of his
patent. He afterwards lived here and was a
prominent member of the Institution of Civil
Engineers. Isaac Mott's ' Sostinente Piano Forte,'
patented by him in 1817, was a further deve
lopment of the idea, and is fully described in the
patent, no. 4098. Mott claimed the power to
increase or diminish the tone at will; and by
rollers acting on silken threads, set in action by
a pedal, the 'sostinente' was brought into action
or stopped. Mott's instrument had some success,
he being at the time a fashionable pianoforte-
maker. This article should be read with PIANO-
VIOLIN, which it completes; also with MELO-
PIANO.3 [A.J.H.]
SOTO, FBANCESCO, born 1534 at Langa in
Spain, entered the college of the Pope's Chapel
June 8, 1562. He was a friend of St. Philip
Neri, and in Dec. 1575 took the direction of the
music in the Oratory founded by him. He also
founded the first Carmelite convent in Rome.
He published the 3rd and 4th books of Laudi
Spiritual! (1588, 1591) in continuation of the
two edited by G. Animuccia, and died as Dean
of the Pope's Chapel, Sept. 25, 1619.
Soto was greatly esteemed by Sixtus V. and
was consulted by him as to the appointments to
the chapel. [G.]
1 Plenius is said to have been the first to attempt to make a
pianoforte in England.
2 Messrs. Broadwood own one of these original upright instru
ments.
3 Mr. R. B. Prosser of the Patent Office has supplied the references
to the Claviol.
640
SOTTO VOCE.
SOTTO VOCE, 'under the voice,' in an
undertone ; a direction of frequent occurrence
in vocal music, where its meaning is obvious.
It is transferred however to instrumental music,
where its meaning is less clear. By some per
formers it is considered that the diminution in
tone should be produced by artificial means, as
by the soft pedal on the piano, or the sordino on
the strings, while others take it as simply equiva
lent to a kind of pp. It may be taken ^as a
universal rule that a sort of hushed effect is in
tended. A notable instance of its use occurs in
the opening of the Choral Symphony. [J.A.F.M.]
SOUNDBOARD or SOUNDING BOARD.
Another word for BELLY [see vol.i. p. 220]. The
wood employed for the soundboards of European
instruments, on account of its resonant qualities,
is the light and elastic Abies Excelsa or Spruce
Fir. [A.J.H.]
SOUNDHOLES, ory-HOLES,two curvilinear
openings in the belly of a stringed instrument, one
on each side of the bridge. They are popularly
Fig. i.
SOUNDHOLES.
supposed to let out the sound ; but they are in
fact indispensable to its production. But for the
soundholes the belly of the fiddle would remain
stiff and motionless under the bow. By cuttin*
the soundholes on each side, the thick central
section of the belly, extending from the top to
the bottom block, and fortified by the bar, is
liberated in the middle, and vibrates readily
under the bow. It communicates its vibration
to the rest of the instrument, and musical tone
is the result. It is obvious that the vibration of
the central section must be considerably affected
by the place, size, and shape of the soundholes :
and their true place and size, like that of the
bridge, was first determined by the makers of
Cremona about the end of the I7th century.
Their shape is considerably older.
Fig. 2 shows the development of the sound-
hole from its primitive form. The primitive
soundhole was round, like that of the guitar,
Fig. i (from a painting in the Florence gallery).
Experiment soon proved that it was better to
leave the central section entire from top to bottom,
Fig. 3.
Fig. 2.
and to cut out only the lateral edges of the circle
on each side, crescentwise (Fig. 2). The circular
soundhole was thus transformed into a pair of
crescents, turned face to face ; and this continued
to be the normal form of soundholes in the I4th
and 1 5th centuries. Fig. 3, a tenor viol from
a picture by Montagna in the Accademia, MiLin,
is a late specimen. The expedient of placing
them back to back (Fig. 4) is as old as the
Fig. 4-
middle of the 1 4th century. This design event
ually prevailed for the viol in the i6th century,
and remained the distinctive mark of the viol
tribe as long as viols continued to be made.
(Fig. 4 is from a large Viola da Gamba, by
Henry Key of Southwark 1611.) It was used
for the Viola da Gamba in England as late as
the middle of the last century, and in France
somewhat later. It still survives in the hurdy-
gurdy. [See HURDT-GURDT, vol. i. p. 758.]
The modern soundhole with a contrary flexure
was developed from the crescent soundhole by
reversing the lower half of the figure (see Fig. 2).
In some early instruments these were placed
back to back (Fig. 5, from tenor viols in the
carved choir-screens of Cremona Cathedral, early
in the i6th century). But experiment soon
showed the expediency of placing them front to
front (Fig. 6, from a very early Italian violin,
about 1580), and the soundhole thus attained
the familiar shape which is distinctive of the
violin tribe. The makers of the iyth century
slightly improved the outline. Fig. 7 shows the
fiddle soundholes of Stradivari, and their position
with reference to the corners. Stradivari first
used the fiddle soundhole for his viols, rejecting
the crescent shape, and in this he was followed
by the other Italian makers.
SOUNDHOLES.
One other form of soundhole requires notice.
It is called by fiddle-makers the ' flaming sword '
(Fig. 8): and as the crescent remained the cha
racteristic of the viola da gamba, the ' flaming
SOUNDHOLES.
641
Fig. 6.
sword' remained the characteristic of the viola
d'amore, long after the /-soundhole had come
into general use. Fig. 9, from an old English
viola d'amore (about 1740), shows the flaming
Fig. 7.
Fig. $.
sword with the terminations of the ordinary
/-hole. Sometimes the flaming-sword termination
is used at the top and the ordinary termination
at the bottom. This mixed form was generally
used for the Barytone (see the engraving in that
article), and for the Lyra- Viol, though the tenor
Lyra-Viol engraved in the article LYRE has fiddle
soundholes.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
diminished vibration, which the peculiar stringing
of the instrument demands.
The /-shaped soundhole has long been used for
instruments of all sizes, from the kit to the
double-bass, its size being proportionally altered
with the scale of the instrument. It is found
to produce the maximum of musical vibration,
and it is therefore improbable that it will ever
be altered in its main features. Uniform as
soundholes may appear, they are in fact sus
ceptible of infinite variety in detail, and in their
Betting in the instrument : and one glance at
them is often enough to discover the maker. Dif
ferent classes of makers generally leaned to a
particular form of soundhole. The Germans have
VOL. in. pi. .
f
The rudimentary form of the 'flaming sword'
soundhole may be seen in Raifaelle's St. Cecilia
in the Bologna Gallery (Fig. 10). It may be
described as a 'flame' rather than a 'flaming
sword,' and is evidently borrowed from the
'tongue of fire' of the Italian painters. The
flaming sword harmonises well with the outline
of the viola d'amore, and its shape conduces to a
Fig. 10.
Fig. II.
made the ugliest. Up to the end of the
century there was considerable variety in cutting
it : but most makers since Stradivari have copied
his soundhole, which is purely geometrical. Those
of the Amatis, of Joseph Guarnerius, and of
Stainer, are equally familiar. The soundhole is
a conspicuous feature in the physiognomy of the
instrument. Many old fiddles have been spoiled
by having their soundholes recut by unscrupulous
vendors, so as to pass for other than they are. So
gross a fraud is easily detected, and can therefore
only impose on the inexperienced. — The sound-
holes are traced on the belly by means of one
carefully-made pattern (Fig. u), which is re
versed for the second hole; they are then cut
Tt
642
SOUNDHOLES.
through with a fine knife, before the belly is
glued on. The inner edges are sloped away, but
the outer are left sharp. A couple of nicks, ex
actly half-way, serve to indicate the position of
the bridge between the soundholes.1 [E.J.P.]
SOUND-POST (Fr. dme; It. anima; Ger.
Stimmstock'), a cylindrical pillar or peg used
in stringed instruments. Structurally, it is cor
relative to the bridge: bridgeless instruments
have no sound-post. It is moveable, and forms
no part of the structure, but is introduced through
the treble sound-hole, and stuck in, by means
of a tool made for the purpose, when the fiddle
is ready to be strung up, in such a way as to
rest firmly on the back and to support the belly,
a little behind the treble foot of the bridge.
The name indicates its importance. The French
and Italians call it the 'soul' (dme, anima),
the Germans the ' voice ' (stimme) of the fiddle. If
the fiddle were strung up without a sound-post,
not only would the belly be crushed in by the
pressure of the strings, but ifc would be destitute
of all tone. The function of the sound-post is
to transmit to the back the vibrations which the
strings excite in the bridge and belly. The in
strument does not vibrate and speak as a whole
until this transmission has taken place ; and the
more accurate the adjustment of the post, the more
perfect the transmission, and the freer and fuller
the tone. Thin bellies, and high models, require
as a rule thick sound-posts, and vice versa. The
sound-post should be made of dry resonant pine
free from shakes and knots ; fiddle-makers will
take two or three pieces, of suitable shape, and
test their comparative resonance by throwing them
sharply on the bench. Its proper substance and
length, and the exact distance at which it should
stand behind the bridge, vary in different instru
ments, and are not easily determined. Old in
struments, having very elastic bellies, admit of
considerable uncertainty as to the proper length.
The longer it is the greater is the tension, and the
more shrill the tone : the closer its fibres, and the
greater its thickness, the thicker the speech of the
instrument : the nearer it stands to the bridge-
foot, the more powerful becomes the vibration,
and the harder the pull of the bow on the strings.
When it is added, that its extremities must be
carefully fitted to the inner surfaces between
which it rests, that it should be stuck in mathe
matically at right angles to the axis of the fiddle,
and that its grain should cross that of the belly
at right angles, it becomes obvious that the
making and fitting of this insignificant bit of
wood are among the most difficult and important
matters in the adjustment of the fiddle, and re
quire an experienced eye and hand.2 If all this
is not properly done, the player's ear is dis-
1 For Figs. 6, 7, 8, 9, and 11, the writer is indebted to Mr. Arthur
Hill of No. 72, Wardour Street.
2 Stoss, of Vienna, one of the best of violin-fitters, used to say that
perfection of tone in violins would never be reached until some one
invented an instrument by which the sound-post could be gradually
lengthened and shortened in the fiddle itself, as the wick of a lamp is
raised and lowered in order to arrive at the proper incandescence.
This, of course, is physically impossible: but the remark hints at the
true solution of the difficulty.
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
satisfied, and he has recourse to experimental
changes of its position, to facilitate which a hole
is sometimes drilled in the sound-post, and a
piece of string permanently attached to it, so
that it may be shifted about at will. This prac
tice should never be indulged in. The sound-
post has only one proper position, and once placed
there, and allowed to get well into its bearings,
the fiddle will yield its proper tone. Otherwise
the tone will necessarily be imperfect. The im
portance of the sound- post has led to many
attempts to improve it. The writer has heard
of metallic sound-posts, and has seen one made
of glass, the effect of which was intolerable.
More rational than such experiments as these
have been certain variations in the sort of wood
employed, and in the shape, the sound-post being
made elliptical or polygonal, instead of cylin
drical. None of these, however, have had any
success, and the round piece of pine which has
been in use from the earliest times will probably
never become obsolete. — Shakspere, whose eye
nothing escaped, gives the name of James Sound-
post to one of the rebec-players in ' Komeo and
Juliet.' [E.J.P.]
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS, MIL1TAKY.
The use of musical instruments in war by the
ancients — a use which is found in all countries
and at all times — appears to have been more as
an incentive to the courage of the troops than
as a means of conveying orders and commands.
It is in the I3th century of our era that we first
find undoubted evidence of the sounding3 of trum
pets in a field of battle as a signal for attack.
At the battle of Bou vines (1215) the French
charge was signalled in this manner, and nu
merous other instances are to be found in the
chronicles of the period. For the next 200 years
at least, the instrument used for signalling seems
to have been the trumpet alone. The question
of the introduction of the drum into Europe is
one involving too much discussion to be entered
upon here, but it may be mentioned as a fact
that the first clear evidence of its use is the pas
sage in Froissart (Bk. I. Pt. i. chap. 322) de
scribing how in the year 1347, Edward III. and
his company entered into Calais ' a grand foison
de menestrandies, de trompes, de tambours, de
nacaires, de chalemies et de muses' — no mean
military band to attend the king of 'unmusical'
England! It is in Italy that the drum seems
first to have been used for signalling purposes.
Macchiavelli, in several passages in his ' Art of
War' (written for Lorenzo de' Medici in t52I)>
clearly states that the drum commands all things
in a battle, proclaiming the commands of the
officer to his troops. He also recommends the
use of trumpets and flutes, the latter being
apparently an idea of his own borrowed from the
3 In connexion with this word we have an instance of Mr. Tenny
son's extreme accuracy in the choice of terms. Where the bugle is
used as a mere means of awakening the echoes he says—
'Blow bugle, blow, set the wild echoes flying-';
but where it is to be used as a signal he employs the strictly correct
term—
'Leave me here, and when you want me, sound upon the bugle-
horn.'
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
Greeks ; lie would give the signals to the trum
pets, followed by the drums, and advises that
the cavalry should have instruments of a different
sound from those used by the infantry. This use
by the Italians of both trumpets and drums is
confirmed by a passage in Zarlino (' Institutione
Harmoniche,' Venice 1558, pt. i. cap. 2), 'Os-
servasi ancora tal costume alii tempi nostri ;
percioche di due esserciti 1'uno non assalirebbe
1'inimico, se non invitato dal suono clelle Trombe
e de Tamburi, overo da alcun' altra sorte de'
musicali istrumenti.' It was from Italy that in
all i robability the earliest musical signals came :
spread over Europe by mercenaries, they were
modified and altered by the different troops
which adopted them, but the two signalling in
struments were everywhere the same (with per
haps the exception of Germany, where the fife
seems to have been introduced), and the names
given to the different sounds long retained evi
dence of their Italian origin. The first military
signals which have been handed down to us in
notation are to be found in Jannequin's remark
able composition ' La Bataille,' which .describes
the battle of Marignan (1515), and was published
at Antwerp in 1545, with a fifth part added by
Verdelot. [See vol. ii. p. 31 b, and vol. iii. p. 35 «.]
A comparison of this composition with the same
composer's similar part-songs ' La Guerre,' ' La
prinse et reduction de Boulogne ' (5th book of
Nicolas du Chemin's Chansons, 1551 ; Eitner,
1551 i.), or Francesco di Milano's 'La Battaglia,'
\vonld be most interesting, and would probably
disclose points of identity between the French
and Italian military signals. The second part
of Jannequin's 'Bataille' (of which the first 10
bars are given here in modern notation) evidently
contains two trumpet calls, ' Le Bouteselle ' and
'Al'Etendart.'
Fan fre re le lelan fan fre re le le Ian fan
SUPBRIUS.
CONTRA.
TENOR.
QUINTA PARS
SI PLACET.
BASS us.
~ X-^ /[> ..
1 — 1~"1 — '~~»"d
inv M^ H * «L*_* »
•i'» ta_g »-
l rn
i
Fan fan
n Fan fan
~H?-
fey | ne
y \- i ' I
1
/*! R ^ * -
/<U Ny
\>1^ T -|
l
Fan
•"V P"^ 1 l~^
i
•Jr. t i - C ts "
^ h IJ/
W -1 |
i
Fan fan
ne fan
,
LLu MLL
frerelele Ian fan fre re lelelan fan fan
fey
fre re le !e Ian fan fre re le le Ian fan
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
643
f re re le le Ian fan fre re le le Ian fan fan
fre re lele Ian fan fre re lelelan fan fan fei |ne"
Ian fey ne fre re lele Ian fan fre re lele Ian fan
I
r
fey ne fan
=g==
^•-•-•-•-e- -*
tHff*
frerelele la ron fre re lele la ron
fre re le le Ian fan fre re le le Ian fan
ra fa ri ra ra fa ri ra ra fa
:f Vfi .-
fan. Bou-tez sel-le
^^.L^:
bou-tez sel-le bou-tez sel-le bou-tez
A lest-an-dart a lest-an-dart a lest-an-dart a
fey ne
^t±^"^=^zr^^E^
r r Tfrf rf r r
lest-an-dart a lest-an-dart a lest- an -
fan. Bou-tez
ri ra ra Bou-tez
-» — •— I — l — • — • — • i— • — • — •- :
sel - le bou-tez sel - le bou-tez sel - le
sel - le bou-tez sel - le bou-tez sel - le
j l-r 1 1 1 1 1 1--
Tr^pr^f
ss§g=
J » H.
sel - le bou-tez sell'
lest-an-dart Tost
A - vant A - vant
a -vant a-vant Bou-tez
i rf rr
dart a lest-an-dart
f f ff T fffWf
r i i i i ' i i i
Bou-tes sel - le bou-tes sel-le Tost i
— &-
1
bou-tez sel - le
fan etc.
Gens dar-mes a che-val gens
Gens etc.
sel - le etc.
lest - an - dart etc.
dar - mes a che - \al etc.
In the same year in which Jannequin's ' Ba
taille' was published, we find in England one of
the earliest of those ' Rules and Articles of War'
of which the succession has been continued down
to the present day. These ' Rules and Orcly-
naunces for the Warre ' were published for the
French campaign of 1544. Amongst them are
the following references to trumpet - signals.
' After the watche shal be set, unto the tyme it
be discharged in the mornynge, no maner of man
make any shouting or blowing of hornes or
whisteling or great noyse, but if it be trumpettes
by a special commaundement.' ' Euery horseman
Tt2
644
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
at the fyrst blaste of the trumpette shall sadle
or cause to be sacllecl his horse, at the seconde to
brydell, at the thirde to leape on his horse backe,
to wait on the kyng, or his lorde or capitayne.'
There is here no mention of drums, but it must
be remembered that by this time the distinction
of trumpet-sounds being cavalry signals and
drum-beats confined to the infantry was probably
as generally adopted in England as it was abroad.
In a Virginal piece1 of William Byrd's preserved
at Christ Church, Oxford, and called 'Mr. Birds
Battel,' which was probably written about the
end of the i6th century, we find different sections,
entitled ' The Souldiers Summons,' ' The March
of the footemen,' ' The March of the horsemen,'
' The Trumpetts,' ' The Irish March,' and ' The
Bagpipe and the Drum.' The first and fifth
of these contain evident imitations of trumpet
sounds which are probably English military sig
nals of the period, the combination of bag-pipes
and drums being a military march. Jehan
Tabourot, in his valuable ' Orche'sographie '
(i588),2 says that the musical instruments used
in war were 'les buccines et trompettes, litues
et clerons, cors et cornets, tibies, fifres, arigots,
tambours, et aultres semblables ' (fol. 6 &), and
adds that 'Ce bruict de tous les diets instruments,
sert de signes et aduertisseinents aux soldats,
pour desloger, marcher, se retirer : et a la ren
contre de 1'ennemy leur donne cceur, hardiesse,
et courage d'assaillir, et se defendre virilement
et vigourousement.5 Tabourot's work contains
the first mention of kettle-drums being used by
cavalry, as he says was the custom of certain
German troops. Similarly in Eabelais we find
a description of the Andouille folk attacking
Pantagruel and his company, to the sound of
' joyous fifes and tabours, trumpets and clarions.'
But though from these passages it would seem
as if signals were given by other instruments
than the drum and trumpet, there can be no
doubt that if this was the case, they were soon
discontinued. ' It is to the voice of the Drum
the Souldier should wholly attend, and not to
the aire of the whistle,' says Francis Markham
in 1622; and Sir James Turner, in his 'Pallas
Armata ' (1683), has the following, 'In some
places a Piper is allowed to each Company ; the
Germans have him, and I look upon their Pipe
as a Warlike Instrument. The Bag-pipe is good
enough Musick for them who love it ; but sure
it is not so good as the Almain Whistle. With
us any Captain may keep a Piper in his Company,
and maintain him too, for no pay is allowed him,
perhaps just as much as he deserveth.'
In the numerous military manuals and works
published during the 1 7th century, we find many
allusions to and descriptions of , the different
signals in use. It would be unnecessary to quote
these in extenso, but Francis Markham's ' Five
Decades of Epistles of Warre' (London, 1622)
demands some notice as being the first work
which gives the names and descriptions of the
different signals. In Decade I, Epistle 5, 'Of
Drummes and Phiphes,' he describes the drum
I See TOl. ii. p. 422 a. 2 See vol. ii. p. 560.
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
signals as follows : ' First, in the morning the
discharge or breaking up of the Watch, then a
preparation or Summons to make them repaire
to their colours ; then a beating away before they
begin to march ; after that a March according
to the nature and custom of the country (for
diuers countries have diuers Marches), then a
Charge, then a Eetrait, then a Troupe, and lastly
a Battalion, or a Battery, besides other sounds
which depending on the phantasttikenes of forain
nations are not so useful.' He also states that a
work upon the art of drumming had been written
by one Hindar : unfortunately of this no copy
apparently exists. Markham is no less explicit
with regard to Trumpet Sounds than he is with
Drum Signals : ' In Horse-Troupes .... the
Trumpet is the same which the Drum anaPhiph
is, onely differing in the tearmes and sounds of
the Instrument : for the first point of warre is
Butte sella, clap on your saddles ; Mounts Cauallo,
mount on horseback ; Tucquet, march ; Carga,
cargo,, an Alarme to charge ; A la Standardo, a
retrait, or retire to your colours ; Auqmt,3 to the
Watch, or a discharge for the watch, besides
diuers other points, as Proclamations, Cals, Sum
mons, all which are most necessary for euery
Souldier both to know and obey' (Dec. Ill,
Ep. i). It is noticeable in this list, that the
names of the Trumpet sounds evidently point
to an Italian origin, while those of the drum
signals are as clearly English. To the list of
signals given by Markham we may add here
the following, mentioned only in different Eng
lish works, but of which unfortunately no musical
notes are given : Reliefe, Parado, Tapto ('Count
Mansfields Directions of Warre,' translated by
W. G. 1624) ; March, Alarm, Troop, Chamadoes
and answers thereunto, Reveills, Proclamations
(Du Praissac's 'Art of Warre,' Englished by J.
Cruso, 1639) ; Call, Preparative, Battle, Retreat
('Compleat Body of the Art Military,' Elton,
1650) ; Take Arms, Come to Colours, Draw out
into the Field, Challenge, General, Parley (' Eng
lish Military Discipline,' 1680); Gathering (Tur
ner's 'Pallas Armata,' 1683).
To return to those signals the notes of which
have come down to us, the earliest collection
extant is to be found in the second book of
Mersenne's 'De Instrumentis Harmonicis,' Prop,
xix (1635), where the following cavalry signals
are given — L'entre'e ; Two Boute-selles ; Acheval;
A 1'estendart ; Le simple cavalquet ; Le double
cavalquet ; La charge ; La chamade ; La retraite ;
Le Guet. Of these signals (copies of which will
be found in a MS. of the i;th century in the
British Museum, Harl. 6461) we give here the
first Boute-selle.
The next collection known is that of Girolamo
Fantini, Trumpeter to Ferdinand II., Duke of
3 Auquet, i. e. An guet—to the watch.
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
Tuscany, whose work is entitled ' Modo per
imparare a sonare di tromba tanto di guerra
quanto musicalmente in organo, con tromba sor-
dina, col cimbalo e ogn'altro istrumento ; ag-
giuntovi molte senate, come balletti, brandi,
capricci, serabande, correnti, passaggi e sonate
con la tromba e organo insieme ' (Frankfurt,
1636). This rare work, to which M. Georges
Kastner first drew attention in his 'Manuel
de Musique Militaire,' contains specimens of
the following trumpet-calls — Prima Chiamata di
Guerra; Sparatadi Butta Sella; L'accavallo; La
marciata; Seconda Chiamata che si va sonata
avant la Battaglia ; Battaglia ; Allo Stendardo ;
Ughetto; Ritirata di Capriccio ; Butte la Tenda ;
Tutti a Tavola. Some of these are very elaborate.
The Boute-selle, for instance, consists of an intro
duction of four bars in common time, followed by
a movement in 6-4 time, twenty-nine bars long,
which is partly repeated. We give here one of
the shorter signals, 'Allo Stendardo': —
(Three times).
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
645
With regard to the German signals of this
period, and indeed with regard to the whole
history of military music in Germany, we are
reluctantly compelled to treat the subject very
cursorily, owing to the almost total want of
material. It has been seen that the use of the
kettledrum for the cavalry came from Germany,
and frequent allusions are made in French works
of the iSth century to the superiority of German
military music. But owing perhaps to the more
general musical intelligence of the soldiers, the
different signals seem to have been handed down
orally to a greater extent than they were with
other nations. It is said that their signals were
better in point of form than those of other
nations, and that they were often derived from
popular Volkslieder, etc. Their musical supe
riority they retain to the present day. An inter
esting point with regard to the German signals
is the habit the soldiers had of inventing doggrel
verses to them. Some of these rhymes are said
to be very ancient, going back so far as the i6th
century. The verses were not confined to the
signals of their own armies, but were sometimes
adapted to those of their traditional enemies, the
French. Freiherr von Soltau gives several of
these in his work on German Volkslieder (Leip
zig, 1845). The following are some of the most
striking : —
Wahre di bure
Di garde di kumbt. (1500.)
Hut dich Bawr ich kom
Mach dich bald davon. (16th cent.)
Zu Bett zu Bett
Die Trommel geht
Und das ihn raorgen friih aufsteht,
Und nicht so lang im Bette leht.
(Prussian Zapfenstreich, or Tattoo.)
Die Franzosen haben das Geld gestohlen,
Die Preussen wollen es wieder holen !
Geduld, geduld, geduld!
(Prussian Zapfenstreich.)
Kartoffelsupp, Kartoffelsupp,
Und daun tind wann ein Schopfenkop',
Mehl, mehl, mehl. (Horn Signal.) 1
Another probable reason of the scarcity of old
collections of signals in Germany is that the
trumpeters and drummers formed a very close
and strict guild. The origin of their privileges
was of great antiquity, but their real strength
dates from the Imperial decrees confirming their
ancient privileges, issued in 1528, 1623, and
1630, and confirmed by Ferdinand III., Charles
VI., Francis I., and Joseph II. Sir Jas. Turner
(Pallas Armata, Lond. 1623) 2 has some account
of this guild, from which were recruited the court,
town, and army trumpeters. Their privileges were
most strictly observed, and no one could become a
master- trumpeter except by being apprenticed to
a member of the guild.3
Returning to France, we find from the time
of Louis XIV. downwards a considerable number
of orders of the government regulating the dif
ferent trumpet and drum signals. Many of
these have been printed by M. Kastner in the
Appendix to his Manuel, to which work we
must refer the reader for a more detailed account
of the various changes which thev underwent.
O i>
In 1 705 the elder Philidor (Andre;) inserted in
his immense autograph collection [see vol. ii.
p. 7°3a}' Par^ °f which is now preserved in the
Library of the Paris Conservatoire, many of the
' batteries et sonneries ' composed by himself and
Lully for the French army. The part which Lully
and Phillidor took in these compositions seems
to have been in adapting short airs for fifes and
hautbois to the fundamental drum-beats. See the
numerous examples printed in Kastner's Manuel.
From this time the number and diversity of
the French signals increased enormously. Besides
Philidor's collection, a great number will be
found in Lecocq Madeleine's ' Service ordinaire
et journalier de la Cavalerie en abrege' (1720),
and Marguery's ' Instructions pour les Tam
bours,' for the most part full of corruptions, and
too often incorrectly noted. Under the Consulate
and Empire the military signals received a num
ber of additions from David Buhl,4 who prepared
different sets of ordonnances for trumpets, drums,
and fifes, which were adopted by the successive
French governments during the first half of the
present century, and still form the principal
body of signals of the French Army.
' In England similar nonsense rhymes are invented for some of the
calls. Their chief authors and perpetuafors are the boy buglers.
The following Officer's Mess Call is an example:—
Of - fl - cers' wives have puddings and pies, but
sol - diers' wives have skil - ly.
2 See also 'Ceremoniel u. Privilegia d. Trompeter u. Paucker"
(Dresden, no date. Quoted in Weckerlin's ' Musiciana,' p. 110).
3 Further information on this subject will be found in Mendel,
sub voce 'Trompeter,' and in the work quoted in that article:
•Versuch einer Anleitung zur heroisch-musikalischen Trompeter-
und-Pauken-Kunst ' (Halle, 1795).
4 See vol. i. p. 281.
646
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
The history of army signals in France is brought
to a close by the restoration last year of the drum
to its former position, the ill-advised attempt to
abolish it from the army having met with uni
versal disfavour. The French signals are much
too numerous for quotation in these pages. They
are superior to the English in the three essentials
of rhythm, melody and simplicity, but in all three
respects are inferior to the German. Perhaps the
best French signal is 'La Retraite,' played as
arranged for three trumpets.
Andante.
i
m 3 — — T~~*^~ — fl —
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
Eeturning to the English signals, after the Re
bellion and during the great continental wars of
the 1 8th century, the English army underwent
many changes, and was much influenced by the
association of foreign allies. The fife had fallen
into disuse, but was reintroduced by the Duke
of Cumberland in 1747. Fifes were first used by
the Royal Artillery, who were instructed in
playing them by a Hanoverian named TJlrich.
They were afterwards adopted by the Guards and
the I Qth, and soon came into general use. Grose
(Military Antiquities) alleges that the trumpet
was first adopted in 1 759 by the Dragoons instead
of the hautbois ; but this is evidently an error, as
by an order of George II., dated July 25, 1743,
'all Horse and Dragoon Grand Guards are to sound
trumpets, and beat drums, at marching from the
Parade and Relieving.' On the formation of light
infantry regiments, drums were at first used by
them, in common with the rest of the army, but
about 1792 they adopted the bugle for signalling
purposes. ' Bugle Horns ' are first mentioned in
the ' Rules and Regulations for the Formations,
Field-Exercise, and Movements, of His Majesty's
Forces,' issued June I, 1792. In December 1798
the first authorised collection of trumpet-bugle
Sounds was issued, and by regulations dated
November 1804 these Sounds were adopted by
every regiment and corps of cavalry in the
service. The bugle was afterwards (and still
is) used by the Royal Artillery, and about the
time of the Crimean campaign was used by the
cavalry in the field, although the trumpet is
still used in camp and quarters. The use of
the drum1 for signalling is almost extinct in
our army, but combined with the fife (now
called the flute), it is used for marching purposes.
Like many other musical matters connected with
the British army, the state of the different bugle
and trumpet sounds calls for considerable reform.
The instruments used are trumpets in Eb and
bugles in Bb, and though the former are said
to be specially used by the Horse Artillery and
Cavalry, and the latter by the Royal Artillery
and Infantry, there seems to be no settled cus
tom in the service, but — as in the similar case
of the different regimental marches — one branch
of the service adopts the instrument of an
other branch whenever it is found convenient.
There are two collections of Sounds published
by authority for the use of the army — 'Trumpet
and Bugle Sounds for Mounted Services and
Garrison Artillery" with Instructions for the
Training of Trumpeters' (last edition 1879); and
'Infantry Bugle Sounds' (last edition 1877).
The former of these works contains the Cavalry
Regimental Calls, the Royal Artillery Regimental
and Brigade Calls, Soundings for Camp and
Quarters, Soundings for the Field, Field Calls
for Royal Artillery when acting as infantry, and
Instructions for Trumpeters. The sounds are
formed by different combinations of the open notes
of the bugle2 and trumpet. Their scales are as
follow : —
i Some of the Drum-beats will be found in vol. i. P- 466 of this
Dictionary. 2 See vol. i. P- 280.
SOUNDS AND SIGNALS.
SPARK.
647
Bugle.
Trumpet.
The Bb of the trumpet is however never used.
Many of the English signals are intrinsically
good, while many are quite the reverse ; and
they are noted down without any regard to the
manner in which they should be played. A com
parison with the sounds used by the German
army (especially the infantry signals) shows
how superior in this respect the latter are, the
rests, pauses, marks of expression, and tempi
being all carefully printed, and the drum-and-
fife marches being often full of excellent effect
and spirit, while in the English manuals attention
to these details is more the exception than the
rule. Space will not allow us to print here any
of the longer signals, either German or English,
but the following Sounds may be interesting, as
showing the differences between the English and
German systems. The sounds are for cavalry in
both cases.
Walk.
Charge.
-0-0
Marscli ! Marsch ! (auch Verfolgung).
Halt.
In conclusion we must refer the reader who
would further investigate this subject to Kastner's
' Manuel general de Musique Militaire ' (Paris
1848), where are to be found a large number of
the signals and sounds in use in the different
European armies in the author's time, as well as
such information on the subject of military
music in general — a subject which has been
hitherto strangely neglected in both Germany
and England. Some little information will also
be found in Mendel's Lexicon (arts. Militair-
Musik, and Trompeter). The present writer is
much indebted to the kindness of Col. Thompson,
Commandant of the Military School of Music,
Kneller Hall ; Lionel Cust, Esq. ; Mr. J. A.
Browne, bandmaster of the South Metropolitan
Schools, and Messrs. H. Potter & Co., who have
furnished information for this article. [W.B.S.]
SOUPIR (a sigh). The French name for a
crotchet rest. A quaver rest is called un demi-
soupir, a semiquaver ditto, un quart de soupir,
and so on. [G.]
SOWINSKI, ALBERT, of Polish origin, was
born in 1803 at Ladyzyn in the Ukraine. He
arrived in Vienna at an early age, was the pupil
of Czerny, Leidesdorf, and Seyfried, and the
friend of Hummel, Moscheles, and others. In
1 830 he settled in Paris as a player and litterateur,
and died there March 5, 1880. He compiled a
Biographical Dictionary of Polish musicians (Les
Musiciens Polonais, etc.; Paris, Le Clere, 1857),
and published a translation of Schindler's ' Bee
thoven' (Paris, Gamier, 1865), °f which latter
we will only say that it is atrociously executed.
An oratorio by him, ' St. Adalbert,' is in the
Library of the late Sacred Harmonic Society. [G.]
SPACE. The stave is made up of 5 lines and
4 spaces. The spaces in the treble stave make
the word FACE, which is useful as a memoria
technica for beginners. [G.]
SPARK, WILLIAM, Mus. Doc., son of a lay-
vicar of Exeter Cathedral, was born at Exeter
Oct. 28, 1825. He became a chorister there, and
in 1840 was articled for five years to Dr. S. Sebas
tian Wesley. On Wesley's leaving Exeter for the
Paiish Church, Leeds, his pupil went with him,
and soon became deputy organist of the Parish
Church, and organist of Chapeltown and St. Paul's
successively. He was next chosen organist to
Tiverton, Devon, and Daventry, Northampton ;
and on Wesley's removal to Winchester in 1850
was appointed to St. George's Church, Leeds,
where he still remains. His activity in Leeds,
outside of his own parish, has been remarkable.
Within a year of his appointment he founded
the Leeds Madrigal and Motet Society. Then
followed the People's Concerts, which resulted
in the erection of the new Town Hall. The
famous organ in the hall was built by Gray &
Davison, from the designs of Henry Smart and
Mr. Spark. It was opened April I, 1859, and
after a severe competition Mr. Spark was elected
the Borough organist, a post which he still holds.
His organ recitals there twice a week are largely
attended. Mr. Spark took his degree as Doctor
648
SPARK.
of Music at Dublin in 1861. In 1869 he started
the ' Organists' Quarterly Journal ' (Novellos),
which has now reached its 58th number. It was
followed by the Practical Choir-master (Metzler),
and in 1881 by a readable and exhaustive bio
graphy of Henry Smart (Reeves, 8vo.). He has
also published three Cantatas, various anthems,
services, glees, and other compositions, besides
editing a large number of organ-pieces by Batiste,
the French organist. [G.]
SPAUN, JOSEPH, FREIHERR VON, musical
amateur, renowned for his great affection for
Schubert; born at Linz, Nov. n, 1788, of a
family originally Swabian, but settled in Austria.
Joseph, the second child of Franz von Spaun,
Syndicus of Upper Austria, attended the Latin
school, passed through a course of philosophy, in
1806 entered the Imperial Stadt-Convict at
Vienna, and began to study law. Music was
diligently pursued in his new sphere, and Spaun
heartily joined, playing the violin, and, as the
oldest boy, conducting the pupils' little band.
On one occasion he became aware of a small
b,oy in spectacles, who stood behind him playing
his rwirt like a master. This was Schubert, who,
after he had got over his first shyness, attached
himself devotedly to Spaun and confided to him
his delight in composing, and his want of music-
paper. This want Spaun supplied, and thus secured
Schubert's lifelong gratitude. [See vol. iii. p. 320.]
In September 1809 Spaun entered the Govern
ment service, and in iSn was placed in the
Lottery department; in 1839 became Regier-
ungsrath, and in 1841 Hofrath ; in 1859 was en"
nobled and received the freedom of the city of
Vienna, and in 1861 retired. He died ISTov. 25,
1865, at his daughter's house at Linz, and, in
accordance with his own wish, was buried in the
churchyard of Traunkirchen (near Gmunden)
where he spent his summers and had a villa.
The whole of his official life, except two short
breaks at Linz in 1818 and Lemberg in 1825,
was passed in Vienna, where he married Fanny
von Roner in 1818. He had five children, of
whom one son, Joseph, was killed at the battle
of Novara.
The list of Spaun's friends includes many inter
esting names, especially the poets Theodor Korner
(whose acquaintance he made in 1813, shortly
before Korner's death), Mayerhofer, Grillparzer,
Franz von Schober (died at Dresden, Sept .13,1882),
and the gifted painter Moritz von Schwind — all
except Korner closely connected with Schubert's
life. After his attachment to Spaun had become
confirmed, Schubert always first showed him his
new songs, and asked his opinion. Spaun also
endeavoured to help him by introductions to
musical people. In this way Schubert made the
acquaintance of Witteczek, the ministerial coun
cillor, who became one of his most devoted ad
herents, and made a collection of Schubert's
works, which he took every pains to render com
plete, and which has furnished materials for all
the biographies and catalogues of Schubert. This
he left to Spaun, stipulating that on his death it
should pass to the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde,
SPECIMENS, CROTCH'S.
in whose archives it may now be seen — a monu
ment of painstaking devotion. The collection
contains a replica by Rieder himself, dated 1840,
of his portrait of Schubert taken in 1825; about
65 vols. printed or MS. containing all Schubert's
vocal, and part of his instrumental works; a
thematic list of the songs from 1811 to 1828;
biographical notices, poems, critiques ; a list of
the 8 1 poets set by him from zEschylus to
Zettler (including Spaun himself as author of the
'J tingling und der Tod') ; the MSS. bought by
Landsberg of Rome from Ferdinand Schubert in
1840 ; several parcels of articles, letters, notices,
extracts from newspapers, poems on Schubert,
concert-bills and programmes ; and 14 pieces in
Schubert's own hand. [C.F.P.]
SPECIMENS, CROTCH'S. 'Specimens of
various styles of music referred to in a Course
of Lectures read at Oxford and London, and
adapted to keyed instruments by W. Crotch,
Mus. Doc., Prof. Mus. Oxon.' This title is
sufficiently explanatory. The lectures were de
livered in 1800-4 and 1820. [See CROTCH.] The
work is in 3 vols., with a preface to each, and
full indexes. Its contents are as follow : —
VOLUME I.
Symphony to Sommi Dei. Hande
Do., Jealousy. Do.
Part of Overture to Ifigenie. Gluck
Moses and the Children of Israe
Handel.
How excellent (opening). Do.
Who is like unto Thee. Do.
He rebuked, and He led them. Do
Menuet in Berenice. Do.
Sonata for Harpsichord (D). D
Scarlatti.
Sanctus. O. Gibbons.
Allegretto, F (Symphony). Haydn
JEWISH Music.
Slow.
Allegretto.
Slow.
Allo. moderate.
Allo. moderate.
IRISH Music.
Cry of Connaught.
Allegro.
Strachen Variga.
Slow.
Slow.
Allegretto.
The Humours of LUtivain.
Slow.
Slow.
Slaunt Ki Plulib.
Drimen Duff.
Curri Koun Dilish.
Da mihi manum.
The Dangling of the Irish Beams
Coohee na finga.
Lento e Affettuoso.
Alleyn a roon.
Old Lango Lee.
Gramachree Molly.
Savourna deligh Shelab Oh.
Another edition.
Irish Trevalin.
Another edition (called Locha-
ber).
Nobe's Maggot.
The Sheep Shearers, or Next oars
Stepney Cakes and Ale.
The Irish Lady.
Boyne Water.
3orn Riggs, or My Nanny 0.
[f to a Foreign Clime you go.
The Foxes sleep.
The Brown Thorn.
The Summer is coming.
Kitty Tyrrel.
Phe Beardless Boy.
The Fair-hair'd Child.
The Ugly Tailor.
Love in Secret.
Open the door softly.
Scotch edition, ' Its open the door.'
The Parting of Friends.
Castle OVNeil.
The Harvest Moon.
John McEyre of the Glen.
The Forlorn Queen.
The Snowy-breasted Pearl.
Dermot O'Drwd.
My Dear stay with me.
The Maid of the Valley.
The Pretty Girl milkiug the Cows.
If the Cat had Gold.
Pittatoughty, or, Where hae been
aday, bonny Laddie.
The Highway to Dublin.
Matthew Briggs.
Captain O'Kain.
Simon Brodie.
Green Goose Fair, or, I am sleep
ing.
Dermot.
The Fairy Queen. Carolan.
The Jointure. Do.
SCOTCH Mosic.
Wet is this night and cold.
Highland Air and Chorus, Luinig.
The Fisherman's Song for attract
ing the Seals.
Slow.
The Mermaid Song.
Slow.
Ossian's soliloquy on the death of
all his cotemporary Heroes.
Slow.
Moderate.
A Tune of the Western Isles.
Western Isle Dance,
low.
Allegro Moderato.
?he Broom of Cowdenknows.
Another edition of the same tune.
A third edition,
wish my love were in a mire,
for our long biding here.
jove is the cause of my mourning.
Old Sir Simon the King,
'he Lass of Patie's Mill.
Another edition.
i Trip to the Jubilee, or, Edin
burgh Castle,
ack on the Green.
Trip to Marrow Bone (Maryle-
bone).
Washington's March, 1665.
'he Sutors of Selkirk,
loslin Castle,
.llegro, 6-8.
SPECIMENS, CROTCH'S.
SPECIMENS, CROTCH'S.
649
'heBirksof Invermay.
•he Braes of Ballenden.
'or Lake of Gold.
Vaking o' the fauld.
:tie: e 's Nancy to the Greenwood
gane.
?y gar.
Vllegro.
Allegro.
Pezgy, now the King's come.
Fhe Yellow-haird Laddie.
Come hap me.
Folwort on the Green.
I'll o'er bogie wi' my love.
Ma'-'gie Lauder.
Wae's my heart.
Tweed Side.
The Bush aboon Traquair.
Lewie Gordon.
Here awa, there awa.
The last timel came o'er the moor,
He 's low down, he 's iu the broom
Yr Eos-lais. The Nightingale's
Song (from a MS.).
The Departure of the King.
The Note of the Dove.
Tw 11 yn ei boch. The Dimpled
Cheek.
OLD ENGLISH TUNES.
The Britons (1696;.
The Twins (1665).
The Beggar Boy (1652).
The Garter, or King James's March
(1695).
Pye Corner (1695).
Crosby Square (1706).
Light o' Love.
Hombey House.
Charming Maid.
The Merry Milkmaids.
The Charmer.
Salutation.
Paul's Steeple (1665).
My Apron Deary
John Hay's bonnie lassie.
The Gaberlunzie Man.
One day I heard Mary say.
She rose, and let me in.
Will ye go.
Gilderoy.
0 Jenny, Jenny.
Thomas, I cannot.
Gin thou \vert mine ain thing.
Sae merry as we twa ha been.
Earl Douglas.
Chevy Chase.
CockleShells.orthe Lass of Living
ston.
KHlei'kianky.
Johnny and Nelly.
Carnm Side.
If e'er I do well it 's a wonder.
Cheerily and Merrilly.
Johnny 1'aa.
Gill Murrice.
Barbara Allen.
Hero and Leander.
Flowers o! the Forest.
Johnny Armstrong.
The Maid of Belma.
WELSH TUNES.
The Shepherd Daughter.
The Same Tune (edition 1652).
Do. ( Do. 1665).
Porter's Lamentation (ed. 1665).
Amorisco (1665).
The Garland.
The Carman's Whistle.
An Old Woman clothed in Gray.
Stingo or Oil of Barley.
Another edition, called ' Cold and
Baw.
All in a. Misty Morning.
Another edition (The Dancing
Master 1652).
London's Loyalty.
i 'lii-shire Bounds.
King's Maggot, or New York.
Cobler's Hornpipe.
Orange Nan.
Sir Roger de Coverley.
The Dusty Miller.
Saturday Night and Sunday Morn
ing (1652).
Alamode de France.
Another edition.calledNone Such.
Slow.
FRENCH NATIONAL Music.
In F, 3-4.
In F, 3-4.
Cainge Dafydd Brophwyd (from a
31S. of the llth century).
Sweet Richard.
Another older edition.
Another edition (.from an old MS.)
Whitelock's Coranto.
Cudyn Uwyn (another edition ot
the same).
Another edition.
Merch Megan.
Another edition.
Griffith ap Cunan.
Y Fedle Fawr.
Allegro Moderate.
The March of the Men of Harlech.
The Courtesy of Merioneth.
The Minstrelsy of Chirk Castle.
Gogerddan.
The Ebb of the Tide.
The Delight of the Men of Doney .
The Mock Nightingale.
Ursula.
The Rising Sun.
Awake harmonious Strings.
Hlij ban Morfydd. Morfydd's Rib
bon.
Ffarwell Ned Puw.
Parry's edition of same tune.
Glan meddwdod nrwyn. Good
humour'd and fairly tipsy.
AT hyd y nees. The livelong night.
Prence D'Angleterre.
Aimable Vainqueur, a Dance
called Louvre.
Pas Pied.
In C, 2-4.
Corrant le Vinnone.
Corrant le Mouuster.
Rigadoon (1695).
Masquerade Royal.
Provencal Song on the Death of
Richard I. (by Gaucelm or
Anselm Faidit).
Roman d'Alexandre (1140).
Song of Thibaut King of Navarre.
Song of Thibaut.
Le Printems rappelle aux armes,
A lovely Lass.
Fill ev'ry Glass.
Bourie d'Auvergne.
Danse des Auvergnats.
Perigourdine.
ITALIAN NATIONAL Music.
Parthenia (1665).
Swiss NATIONAL Music.
Bans de Vache.
Another edition.
GERMAN NATIONAL Music.
Tune of the Bohemian Miners.
Ffarwel Ednyfed Fychan, or
Towyn Castle.
Dafyddy Garregwen.
Oil y Fwyalch. The Blackbird's
Retreat (from a MS.)
Codiad yr Hedydd. The Rising ot
the Lark.
The Bed Piper's Melody.
Magena Gollod ei gardas.
The March of the Men of Gla
morgan.
The Monks' March.
The Dawning of the day.
The Camp of the Palace. (Of noble
race was Shenkin.)
Dilj-n Serch. The Pursuit of Love.
Allegro.
Allegro Moderate.
Allegro.
Allegro Moderato.
An Old German Tune.
Valtzer or Waltz.
Allegro.
SPANISH NATIONAL Music.
A Fandango (Corelli's Follia).
Do.
Do.
Do.
A Boleras.
Do.
Do.
Do.
araband 1665.
Spanish Tune.
Spanish Dance.
Moorish Air.
Hottentot Tune.
Hungarian Tune.
Do.
POLISH NATIONAL Music.
Cossac.
Polacca.— Trio.
Polonoise. — Trio.
Polonese.— Trio.
SCANDINAVIAN NATIONAL Music.
Slow.
Song of Harold the Valiant.
Scandinavian Song.
Song of Odin.
Scandinavian Song.
NORWEGIAN NATIONAL Music.
Moderato.
Chanson.
Allegro.
Moderato.
Allegro.
Allegro.
Allegro Moderato.
Vivace.
Allegro Moderato.
Allegro.
Allegro.
Moderato.
In G minor 2-4.
Duett.
Summer Song.
Winter Song.
Allegro Molto.
In D minor, G-8.
Allegro.
Allegretto.
Buna of the Finlanders.
DANISH NATIONAL Music.
In A minor, C time.
RUSSIAN Music.
Allegro,
Allegretto.
Sluw.
Allegro.
Allegretto.
Presto.
Andante.
Adagio.
Allegretto.
Allegro.
Allegro.
Slow.
Air de Danse Busse (Pas Eusse).
in D major, 2-4.
Andante.
Sclavonian Tune.
TURKISH Music,
n A, 2-4.
anse Grecque.
nother edition, Romeca.
anse des peuples de L'Archipel.
urkish March,
anse Turque.
altaduristico.
ir Bedouin (Arabian Tune),
rabian Song. Zoro me na.
Persian Song.
CHINESE TUNES.
n G, 2-4.
n G, 4-4.
low.
ifoo-lee-chwa.
ong of the Chinese Boatmen.
Canon 2 in 1.
EAST INDIAN TUNES.
hel Chel Moniani.
n F, 4-4.
une of Indostan. Dergeni.
talay Tune,
ndante.
. Madras Boat Song.
Hindostanee Air.
o mani.
loderato.
iaki a faslah.
Another edition. Bekhtah.
Another edition. Bengal song.
Sackia.
How.
Ai booti serray.
^ss shone,
hura Wallen.
Mare Pie.
Yareg be wo fa.
The Snake Song.
Kekhtah (another edition).
Ebona.
Uarsea, an Elegy.
Dandee Song (Boatmen's).
Presto.
Hindoo Hymn.
Bombay Air.
Alei Y ar Bigia.
Dance.
Tuppah.
Tuppah, ' Dende kala.'
Terana, ' Dandora vakee.'
Teraua, ' La Yawm la Yawm.'
Music OF NOKTH AMERICA.
Canadian Tune. Allegro.
Do. Slow.
Do. Slow.
Do. D minor. 2-4.
Do. Allegro,
Song sung toy the Indians of Nor
folk Sound. Alia Coosh.
VOLUME II.
VARIOUS STYLES,
Ambrosian Chant, A.D. 384.
Plain Chant. Guido (1022).
Other-Harmonies. Do.
Harmony. Franco.
Chant. Josquin de Pres.
1st Psalm O. V. Martin Luther.
38th Psalm O. V.
81st Psalm O.V.
lllth Psalm O.V, French Tune.
I will exalt Thee. Tye.
Lord, for Thy tender mercies sake.
Farrant.
Gloria Patri. Do.
Deposuit Potentes. Palestnna.
We have heard with our ears,
Do.
Gloria Patri. Tallis.
' Dissi a Vamata mia.' Marenzio.
Bow thine ear. William Bird.
Nou nobis Domine. Do.
Double Chant. Morley.
Symphony, 3 flutes. Peri.
Fate Festa al Signore.
Cavaliero.
Hosauna. O. Gibbons.
Almighty and everlasting
God is gone up. Do.
Gloria Patri. Do.
The Silver Swan. Do.
Awake, Sweet Love. Dowland.
1 S' in ch' havro Spirto. Carissimi
E. da
Do.
Movement from Amante che dile.
Carissimi.
Hodie Simon Petrus. Do.
Jt ululantes— Jephtha. Do.
Abiit ergo in montes. Do.
?lorate filise Israel. Do.
Deum de Deo. Do.
Part of a Cantata, Fortunati tnlel
martire. A. Scarlatti.
Aria, Perche geme O tortorella.
Do.
Do., Voglio amar. Do.
Do., Non da piu peni O cara. Do.
Do., Che piu brami. Do.
Do., II seno de mia vita. Do.
Cantata, 'Son ferito.' Do.
Aria, Strada penare. Do.
Do., H destin. Do.
Do., 'Illustreilsanguemio.' Do.
Do., Con 1'arte del mio cor. Do.
Do. Miei fidi a vendetta. Do.
Do., L'lnnocente diffendete. Do.
Duet, Non son piu. Do.
Aria, Due bellissime pupille. Do.
Do., 11 mio flglio. Do.
Part of Cantata, ' Che mesta horti
sospiro. Do.
Motet, Domine quinque talenta.
L. Bossi.
Anthem, Teach me, 0 Lord.
Rogers.
'Single Chant. T. Purcell.
650
SPECIMENS, CROTCH'S.
Aria, Opri il fato. Anon.
Do., No non amero. Do.
Do., Due vaghe pupille. Do.
Do., Del tuo cor tempri. Do.
Do., Se tu credi. Do.
Do., Tanto basti per far. Do.
Do., Bella bocca di cinabro. Do.
Do., Foglio lieve. Do.
Do., Tu fuggisti 0 caro. Do.
Do., Crine vezzose. Do.
Do., Dolce Amor mi dice spera.
Do.
Do., Lusingami speranza. Do
Do., Begl" occhi perdonatemi.
Do.
Do., Col freddo suo velen. Do.
Do., Se il mio labbro. Do.
Do., Gia che amor. Do,
Do., Seversastida tuoi iumi. Do.
Do., Fantasmi orribili. Do.
Cantata, Taci O cruda. Do.
Aria, Begl' ocelli d'amore. Do.
Do., Migravit Juda. Do.
Do., Gloria Putri. Dr. Child.
Do., Dormidormibenmio. Oesti.
Tart of Cantata, Dite a lei. Stra-
della.
Cantata. Se gelose, sel Tu. Do.
Canzonet, Chi dira. Do.
Aria. Vado ben Spesso. Salv. Eosa.
Gloria Patri. Blow.
Anthem, I will arise. Chreyghton.
Duet, Dormlno 1'aureestive. Du-
rante.
7th, Concerto. A. Corelli.
Part of 2nd Sonata, op. 1. Do.
Fugue from the 4th Sonata, op. 3.
Do.
Part of the 7th Solo. Do.
Part of the llth Solo. Do.
Anthem. Out of the deep. Al-
drich.
Do., O God, Thou hast cast us
out. H. Purcell.
Gloria Patri. Do,
Do. Do.
Do. Do.
Do. Do.
Part of 1st Sonata. 1st set. Do.
From 6th Sonata. 1st set. Do.
From 9th Sonata. 2nd set. Do.
In guilty night. Do.
Overture to King Arthur. Do.
Chaconne, before the Play. Do.
Brave souls to be renowned. Do.
Gloria Patri. Dr. Croft.
Qui diligit Mariam. Steffani.
Dixit Dominus. Leo.
Part of a Mass. Pergolesl.
' Euridice e dove sei ' (Orfeo). Do.
Gloria in Excelsis. Do.
4th Psalm. Marcello.
7th Psalm. Do.
From Der Tod Jesu. Graun.
Te gloriosus (Te Deum). Do.
Overture to I Pellegrini. Hasse.
'Le Porte noi diserra.' Do. Do.
Pellegrino e 1'uomo. Do. Do.
Overture to Pastor Fido. Handel.
Aria, Son contusa (Poro). Do.
He is my God (Israel in Egypt).
Do.
Chorus, The listening crowd. Do.
Do. May nu rash intruder. Do.
Double Chorus, He gave them
Hailstones. Do.
Fugue (in E). Bach.
No. 2 of the 12 solos for the Violin.
Tartini.
Air, Pupillette vezzosette, from
Ormisda, Vinci.
Air, Infelice abbandonata. Do.
Concerto 6, op. 3. Geminiani.
Concerto2. Bicciotn
Part of Sonata 10. Paradies.
Jlequiem. Jomelli.
Chorus, Santa Speme (Passione).
Do.
Sonata 3. CrispJ.
Part of Sonata 4. Do.
Fantasia. C. P. E. Bach.
Concerto for a full Band. J. C.
Bach.
Overture to Ifigenie en Aulide.
Gluck.
Chorus, Que d'attralts.
Overture, Pierre le Grand. Grelry.
Do., Don Quichotte. Champigny.
VOLUME III.
Overture. Toison D'Or. Vogel.
Part of Sonata 2. Vanhall.
Part of Sonata 2, op. 9. Bchobert.
Minuet and Trio, Sonata 1, op. 5.
Do.
Part of Quintet 3, op. 12. Boo
cherini.
Sonata 3 op. 23. Kozeluch.
Part of Quartet 1. 8th set. Pleyel.
Do. 6. op. 8. Do.
Part of Sonata 1, op. 12. Krump-
holtz.
Do. 2, op. 11. Hullmandel.
Do. 2, op. 4. Clementi.
Adagio from op. 11. Do.
Part of Sonata 4, op. 12. Do.
Eecordare from a Requiem. Mo
zart.
Benedictus from Do. Do.
Overture, Le Nozze di Figaro. Do.
Part of Quartets, op. 76. Haydn.
Sinfonia, in Eb. Do.
!<: i
SPEECHLEY, HENRY, after working 14 years
with his uncle J. C. Bishop, and 6 more with
Henry Willis, set up on his own account in London
as organ-builder in 1862. His best works may be
seen at Alton, Bosbury, Dalston (St. Mark's), and
in Exeter, where he reconstructed and enlarged
Loosemore's organ in the Cathedral. [V. de P.]
SPEIDEL, a musical family of Ulm. i.
KONRAD, well-known singer and director of the
' Ulm Liederkranz ' singing society : he died
Jan. 29, 1880. 2. His eldest son, WJLHELM,
born Sept. 3, 1826, was educated in music first
by his father and then by I. Lachner and W.
Kuhe. After teaching for two years at Thann
in Alsace he made Munich his headquarters, but
was widely known as a PF. player throughout
Germany, and intimately associated with Schu
mann, Liszt, and Thalberg. He was music-
director at Ulm from 1854 to 1857, but in the
latter year joined Stark, Lebert, etc. in founding
the Conservatorium at Stuttgart, and remained
there as Professor of the PF. till 1 8 74, when he
left the Conservatorium to found a private school
SPINA.
of his own. He is conductor of the Stuttgart
'Popular Concerts.' His works are numerous
comprising 65 opus numbers in all departments'.
He has also edited the sonatas of Haydn and
Mozart, and the PF. works of Mendelssohn.
3. His brother LUDWIG was born, also at Ulm,
April n, 1830. He received his education at
the University of Munich, and joined the staff of
the Augsburg Gazette. In 1853 he took up his
quarters in Vienna, and was soon engaged on
the press of that city, first on the ' Presse/ then
on the ' Neue Freie Presse ' and the ' Fremden-
blatt,' for both of which he still writes. He is
one of the most considerable Anti-Wagnerites of
the day, of great independence of opinion and
remarkable force of expression. Herr Speidel
is also well-known as a devoted adherent of
Schubert.
SPEYER, or SPEIER, WILHELM, composer,
was born June 21, 1790, at Frankfort-on-the-
Main, where he died April 5, 1878. He received
his musical education at Offenbach under Thieriot
(the friend of Weber) and Andre". He was
already a prominent violinist when he went to
Paris in 1812, to become a pupil of Baillot, from
whose instruction and from the acquaintance of
such men as Cherubini, Boieldieu, MeTiul, etc.,
he derived much benefit. Returning to Germany
afterwards, he settled down at Frankfort and
exchanged the musical profession for that of a
merchant, but continued to compose — at first
chiefly chamber music. He published string
quartets and quintets, and also violin duets, which
are still looked upon as standard works in that
class of composition. He afterwards devoted
himself chiefly to vocal music, and it is as a
writer of songs that his name is best and most
widely known. Amongst his Lieder — of which
he published several hundred — many, such as
'The Trumpeter,' ' Rheinsehnsucht ' (My heart's
on the Rhine), 'Die drei Liebchen,' etc., acquired
an extraordinary popularity. He also wrote
vocal quartets and some choral works.
With Mendelssohn and his family Speyer was
on terms of affectionate intimacy, and to him the
charming story given in vol.ii. p. 2806 is due. [G-.]
SPIANATO (Ital.), level, even. A word used
by Chopin in the Andante which precedes the
Polonaise in Eb, op. 22, to denote a smooth
and equal style of performance, with but little
. , J f „-,
variety. [*•*••}
SPICATO (Ital.), accurately 'separate/ 'dis
tinct.' A term applied in violin-playing to a
particular vibratory style of bowing. 'Spicato
and ' Saltato ' are both explained under the head
of SPRINGING Bow. [&]
SPINA, CARL ANTON. ThesuccessoroftheDia-
bellis in that famous publishing house at Vienna,
which for so long stood in the Graben, No. 1 1 33'
at the corner of the Braunerstrasse. He succeeded
them in 1852, and was himself succeeded by F.
Schreiber in July 1872. During this twenty
years Spina's activity showed itself especially m
the publication of Schubert's works, a mass of
whose MSS. he acquired from Diabelli. Chief
SPINA,
among these were the Octet, Quintet in C, Quar
tets in D minor, G, and Bb, the Overture in the
Italian style, those to Alfonso and Estrella,
Fierrabras, Rosamunde, with Entractes in B
minor arid Bb, the B minor Symphony, Sonata
for PF. and Arpeggione, etc., all in score.
Mr. Spina's enthusiasm for Schubert was not
that of a mere publisher, as the writer from per
sonal experience of his kindness can testify. It
was he who allowed the Crystal Palace Company
to have copies of several of the orchestral works
for playing, long before there was sufficient public
demand to allow of their being published. [G-.]
SPINDLER, FRITZ, pianoforte - play er and
composer for that instrument, born Nov. 24,
1817, at Wurzbach, Lobenstein, was a pupil of
F. Schneider of Dessau, and has been for many
years resident in Dresden. His published works
are more than 330 in number, the greater part
brilliant drawing-room pieces, but amongst them
much teaching-music, and some works of a
graver character — trios, sonatinas, two sympho
nies, concerto for PF. and orchestra, etc. His
most favourite pieces are — Wellenspiel (op. 6) ;
Schneeglocklein (op. 19); Silberquell (op. 74);
Husarenritt ; 6 dance themes ; Transcriptions of
Tannhauser and Lohengrin. [G.]
SPINET (Fr. Epindte\ Ital. Spinetta). A
keyed instrument, with plectra or jacks, used in
the i6th, 1 7th, and l8th centuries; according to
Burney (Rees's Cycl. 1819, 'Harpsichord') 'a
small harpsichord or virginal with one string to
each note.' The following definitions are from.
Florio's 'New World of Words,' 161 1 : — 'Spinetta,
a kind of little spina . . . also a paire of Virgin-
alles'; l Spinettegiare, to play upon Virginalles';
'Spinetto, a thicket of brambles or briars' — (see
Rimbault's History of the Pianoforte, 1860).
\Ve first meet with the derivation of spinet from
spina, a thorn, in Scaliger' s Poetices (1484-1550;
lib. i. cap. Ixiii.). Referring to the plectra or
jacks of keyed instruments, he says that, in his
recollection, points of crowquill had been added
to them, so that what was named, when he was
a boy, ' clavicymbal ' 'and 'harpichord' (sic), was
now, from these little points, named 'spinet.'
[See JACK.] He does not say what substance
crowquill superseded, but we know that the old
cithers and other wire-strung instruments were
twanged with ivory, tortoiseshell, or hard wood.1
Another origin for the name has been discovered,
to which we believe that Signor Ponsicchi ('II
Pianoforte,' Florence, 1876) was the first to call
attention. In a very rare book, 'Conclusion!
nel suono dell' organo, di D. Adriano Banchieri,
Bolognese' (Bologna, 1608), is this passage:—
Spinetta riceve tal nome dall' inventpre di tal forma
lon«a quadrata, liquate f(a un maestro Giovanni Spinetti,
Venetiano, ed uno di tali stromenti ho veduto io alle
mani di Francesco Stivori, organista della magnifica
comunita di Montagnana, dentrovi questa inscrizione :
JOANNES SPINETUS VENETUS FECIT. A.D; 1503.
i With reference to the early use of leather for plectra, as men
tioned in HARPSICHORD, we now consider the evidence of existing
instruments as very doubtful, owing to their having possibly been
altered during repairs. The old Italian jacks were provided with
little steel springs to bring back the plectra to an upright position.
The bristles were later in date. See the Pisan clavicembalo and Mr.
Fairfax Murray's spinet now at Florence.
SPINET.
651
According to this the spinet received its name
from Spinetti, a Venetian, the inventor of the
oblong form, and Banchieri had himself seen one
in the possession of Stivori, bearing the above
inscription. M. Becker of Geneva ('Revue et
Gazette musicale,' in the ' Musical World,' June
15, 1878), regards this statement as totally in
validating the passage from Scaliger; but not
necessarily so, since the year 1503 is synchronous
with the youth of Scaliger. The invention of
the crowquill points is not claimed for Spinetti,
but the form of the case — the oblong or table
shape of the square piano and older clavichord,
to which Spinetti adapted the plectrum instru
ment ; it having previously been in a trapeze-
shaped case, like the psaltery, from which, by
the addition of a keyboard, the instrument was
derived. [See VIRGINAL ; and also for the different
construction and origin of the oblong clavichord.]
Putting both statements together, we find the
oblong form, of the Italian spinet, and the crow
quill plectra, in simultaneous use about the year
1500. Before that date no record has been found.
The oldest German writers, Virdimg and Arnold
Schlick, whose essays appeared in 1511, do not
mention the spinet, but Virdung describes and
gives a woodcut of the Virginal, which in Italy
would have been called at that time ' spinetta/
because it was an instrument with plectra in an
oblong case. Spinetti's adaptation of the case
had therefore travelled to Germany, and, as we
shall presently see, to Flanders and Brabant, very
early in the i6th century; whence M. Becker
conjectures that 1503 represents a late date for
Spinetti, and that we should put his invention
back to the second half of the I5th century, on
account of the time required for it to travel, and
be accepted as a normal form in cities so remote
from Venice.
M. Vander Straeten (' La Musique aux Pays-
Bas,' vol. i.) has discovered the following refer
ences to the spinet in the household accounts of
Margaret of Austria : —
A ung organiste de la Ville d'Anvers, la somme de
vi livres auquel madicte dame en a fait don en faveur
de ce que le xve jour d'Octobre xv. xxii [1522] il a amene"
deux jeunes entfaus, filz et fille, qu'ils ont jouhe' sur
une espinette et chants' a son diner.
A 1'organiste de Monsieur de FienneS; sept livres
dont Madame lui a fait don en faveur de ce que le
second jour de De'cembre xv.xxvi [1526] il est venu
jouher d'un instrument dit espinette devant elle a son
diner.
The inventory of the Chateau de Pont d'Ain,
1531, mentions ' una espinetta cum suo etuy,' a
spinet with its case; meaning a case from which
the instrument could be withdrawn, as was cus
tomary at that time. M. Becker transcribes
also a contemporary reference from the Munich
Library : —
Q.uartorze Gaillardes, neuf Pavannes, sept Bransles
et deux Basses-Dances, le tout reduict de musique en la
tablature du ieu (jeu) Dorgues, Espinettes, Manicor-
dions et telz semblables instruments musicaux, impri-
me'es a Paris par Pierre Attaignant MDXXIX.
The manichord was a clavichord. Clement
Marot (Lyons, 1551) dedicated his version of the
Psalms to his countrywomen : —
652
SPINET.
SPINET.
Et vos doigts sur les Espinettes,
Pour dire Saintes Chansonettes.
With this written testimony we have fortunately
the testimony of the instruments themselves,
Italian oblong spinets (Spinetta a Tavola), or
those graceful pentangular instruments, without
covers attached, which are so much prized for
their external beauty. The oldest bearing a date
is in the Conservatoire at Paris, by Francesco di
Portal upis, Verona, 1523. The next by Antoni
Patavini, 1550, is at Brussels. We have at S.
Kensington two by Annibal Rosso of Milan, 1555
and 1577, and one by Marcus Jadra (Marco dai
Cembali; or dalle Spinette) 1568. Signor Kraus
has, at Florence, two 16th-century spinets, one of
which is signed and dated, Benedictus Florianus,
1571; and at the Hotel Cluny, Paris, there is
one by the Venetian BafFo, date 1570, whose
harpsichord (clavicembalo) at S. Kensington is
dated I574-1
For the pentangular or heptangular model
it is probable that we are indebted to Annibal
Eosso, whose instrument of 1555 ig engraved
in the preceding illustration. Mr. Carl Engel
has reprinted in the S. Kensington Catalogue
(1874, P- 273) a passage from 'La Nobilita di
i Since the article HARPSICHORD was written, an Italian clavicem
balo has been acquired for South Kensington, that is now the oldest
keyed instrument in existence, with a date. It is a single keyboard
harpsichord with two strings to each key ; the compass nearly 4
octaves, from E to D. The natural keys are of boxwood. The in
scription Is ' Aspicite ut trahitur suavi Modulamine Vocis. Quicquid
habent aer sldera terra fretrum. Hieronymus Bononiensis Faciebat
Romae MDXXI.' The outer case of this instrument is of stamped
leather. It was bought of a 'brocanteur' in Paris for 1201. We know
of no other instrument by Geronimo of Bologna. Another harpsi
chord nearly as old has been seen by the writer this year (1882) in
Milano' (1595"), which he thus renders :— ' Han
nibal Rosso was worthy of praise, since he was
the first to modernise clavichords into the shape
in which we now see them,' etc. The context
clearly shows that by 'clavichord' spinet was
meant, clavicordo being used in a general sense
equivalent to the German Clavier. If the modern
ising was not the adoption of the beautiful forms
shown in the splendid examples at South Ken
sington—that by Rosso, of 1577, having been
bought at the Paris Exhibition of 1867 for £1200
on account of the 1928 precious stones set into
the case — it may possibly have been the wing-
form, with the wrestpins above the keys in front,
which must have come into fashion about that
time, and was known in Italy as the Spinetta
Traversa ; in England as the Stuart, Jacohean,
or Queen Anne spinet, qr Couched Harp. There
is a very fine Spinetta Traversa, emblazoned with
the arms of the Medici and Compagni families,
in the Kraus Museum (1878, no. 193). Pratorius
illustrates the Italian spinet by this special form,
speaks (' Organographia,' Wolfenbiittel, 1619) of
larger and smaller spinets, and states that in the
Netherlands and England the larger was known as
the Virginal. The smaller ones he describes as
' the small triangular spinets which were placed
for performance upon the larger instruments, and
were tuned an octave higher.' Of this small instru
ment there are specimens in nearly all museums ;
the Italian name for it being ' Ottavina ' (also
'Spinetta di Serenata'). We find them fixed
in the bent sides of the long harpsichords, in
two remarkable specimens ; one of which, by
Hans Ruckers,2 is preserved in the Kunst-und-
Gewerbe Museum, Berlin (there is a painting of
Messrs. Chappell's warehouse. It is a long instrument in an outer
painted case. The belly and marking off are evidently not original, but
the keyboard of boxwood with black sharps has not been meddled
with. There are 3| octaves from F to C ; the lowest Fjf and (i#are
omitted. The maker's inscription, nearly illegible, records that the
instrument was made by a Florentine at Pisa, in 1526.
2 This rare Hans Euckers harpsichord was seen by the writer sub
sequent to the compilation of the catalogue appended to the article
RUCKERS. As others have also been found, the following particulars
of them complete the above-mentioned list to 1882. [See also VIE-
GINALLS.]
Form.
Bent side harp
sichord with
octave spinet
in one.
Date.
1594
Dimensions.
ft. in. ft. in.
5 11 by 2 6
HANS RUCKERS the Elder.
General Description.
2 keyboards ; the front one 4 oct., C— C ; the
side one 3) Oct., E— A, without the highest G{;
3 stops in original position at the right-hand
side; white naturals. Rose No. 1; and Rose
to octave spinet an arabesque. Painting in
side top showing a similar combined instru
ment. Inscribed HANS ROCKERS MB TECIT
ANTWERPIA.
Present Owner.
Gewerbe Museum, Ber
lin.
Source of inform
ation.
A. J. Hipkins.
Bent side.
Bent side.
Bent side.
1029
I'
1G46
4 by 3 0
G 1 by 2 10J
7 5 by 3 0
HANS RUCKERS the Younger.
2 keyboards; 58 keys, G— F ; black naturals. I M. Gerard de Prins,
Rose No. 4. | Louvain.
ANDRIES RUCKERS the Elder.
1 keyboard ; 4 oct., C— C ; without lowest C# ; M. G. de Prins.
white naturals. Rose No. 6; painting of a
hunt.
2 keyboards, each 5 oct. ; black naturals. Rose | M. Paul Endel, Paris.
No. 6. Inscribed ANDREA ROCKERS ME FECIT I
ANTVERPIAE.
F. P. de Prins,
Limerick.
F. P. de Prins.
P. Endel.
SPINET.
a similar double instrument inside the lid) : the
other is in the Maison Plantin, Antwerp, and
was made as late as 1734-5, by Joannes Josephus
Coenen at Euremonde in Holland. In rect
angular instruments the octave one was remove-
able, as it was in those double instruments
mentioned under RUCKERS (p. 195 6), so that it
could be played in another part of the room.
According to Mersenne, who treats of the
spinet as the principal keyed instrument (' Har-
monie/ 1636, liv. 3, p. 101, etc.), there were three
sizes ; one of 2| feet, tuned to the octave of the
'ton de chapelle' (which was about atone higher
than our present high concert pitch) ; one of 3^
feet tuned to a fourth above the same pitch ; and
the large 5-feet ones, tuned in unison to it. We
shall refer to his octave spinet in another para
graph.
The compass of the Ottavine was usually from
E to C, three octaves and a sixth (a) ; of the
larger 16th-century Italian spinette, four octaves
and a semitone, from E to F(6). The French
tpinettes of the 1 7th century were usually deeper,
having four octaves and a semitone from B to C (c).
SPINET.
653
The reason for this semitonal beginning of the
keyboard is obscure unless the lowest keys were
used for ' short octave ' measure, an idea which
suggested itself simultaneously to the writer and
to Professor A. Kraus, whose conviction is very
strong as to the extended practice of the short
octave arrangement. The Flemish picture of
St. Cecilia, in Holyrood Palace, shows unmis-
takeably a short octave organ keyboard as early
as I484.1
Fortunately we are not left to such suggestion
for the spinet short octave. Mersenne, in a
passage which has hitherto escaped notice
('Harmonic,' liv. 3, p. 107), describing his own
spinet, which, according to him, was one of the
smallest in. use, says ' the longest string has
little more than a foot length between the two
bridges. It has only thirty-one steps in the
keyboard, and as many strings over the sound
board, so that there are five keys hid on account
of the perspective (referring to the drawing)—
to wit, three principals and two chromatics
(' feintes '), of which the first is cut in two ; but
these chromatics serve to go down to the third
and fourth below the first step, or C sol, in
notation
order to arrive at the
1 Hubert, or Jan, Van Eyck's St. Cecilia, in the famous Mystic Lamb,
y be referred to here although appertaining to the organ and not
the spinet, as a valuable note by the way. The original painting, now
at Berlin, was probably painted before 1426 and certainly before 1432.
•The painter's minute accuracy is unquestionable. It contains a
chromatic keyboard like the oldest Italian, with boxwood naturals
and black sharps. The compass begins in the bass at the halt-tone E.
There is no indication of a ' short octave,' but there is one key by
itself, convenient to the player's left hand ; above this key there is a
latchet acting as a catch, which may be intended to hold it down as
a pedal. D is the probable note, and we have in Van Eyck's organ,
it seems to us, the same compass, but an octave lower, as in the Ger
man Positif of the next century at South Kensington— viz. D, E, then
* chromatic octaves fromF, and finally F#, G, A. There is no bottom-
rail to the keyboard, nor is there in the painting at Holyrood.
third octave, for the eighteen principal steps
only make an eighteenth; that is to say, a
fourth over two octaves.' Here is the clearest
confirmation of short -octave measure in the
spinet, the same as in the organ, both key
boards, according to Mersenne, being conform
able. But owing to the fact that the woodcut
represents a different spinet from that described
(apparently descending to B), the description is
not clear. To reach the third octave would re
quire an F, for which one half the cut chromatic
in the spinet described may be reserved. But
the B of the drawing would, by known analogy
with organ practice, sound G, and A would be
found on the Cfl. The B also on the DjJ key,
though this is generally found retained as Eb on
account of the tuning.2 It is inferred that F
was reached by dividing the lowest natural key ;
these diagrams therefore represent what we will
call the C short measure, as that note gave the
pitch.
AB AEt> F AB.orEb
II
If
11
II
G C D E P
G C D E F
G C D E F
Mersenne's express mention of C as the longest
string shows that the still deeper G and A were
made so, in his spinet, by weight : an important
fact, as we have not seen a spinet in which it
could have been otherwise, since in large in
struments the bridge is always unbroken in its
graceful curve, as it is also in the angles — always
preserved — of the bridge of an octave one. The
intimate connection of the spinet and organ
keyboards must palliate a trespass upon ground
that has been authoritatively covered in ORGAN
(p. 588). It is this connection that incites in
quiry into the origin of the short octaves, of
which there are two measures, the French, Ger
man or English C one, which we have described,
and the Italian F one, which we will now con
sider. We propose to call this F, from the pitch
note, as before. We have reason to believe these
pitch notes originally sounded the same, from
which arose the original divergence of high and
low church-pitch ; the C instrument being thus
thrown a fourth higher. The Italian short mea
sure having been misapprehended we have sub
mitted the question of its construction to the
high authority of Professor Kraus, and of Mr.
W. T. Best, who has recently returned from an
examination of the organs in Italy. Both are in
perfect agreement. Professor Kraus describes
the Italian short octave as a progression of three
dominants and tonics, with the addition of B
molle(b) and B quadro (d) for the ecclesiastical
tones. The principle, he writes, was also ap
plied to the pedal keyboards, which are called
' Pedaliera in Sesta,' or ' Pedaliera a ottava
2 It may have been on account of the tuning that A and D were
left untretted in the old ' gebunden ' or fretted clavichords ; but the
double Irish harp which Galilei (Dissertation on Ancient and
Modern Music, A.D. 1581) says had been adapted in Italy, had those
notes always doubled in the two rows of strings, an importance our
tuning hypothesis fails to explain.
654
SPINET.
ripiegata.'1 Professor Kraus maintains the nearly
general use of the short octave in Italian spinets,
harpsichords, clavichords, and organs, and to some
harpsichords he adds even another dominant.
D E Bt> G D E Bb
TIT
TIT
C F G ABflC
CFG ABQC
According to this, the oldest harpsichord known
to exist, ,the Roman one of 1 5 2 1 , at S. Kensington,
is a short octave F instrument. But extended
keyboards existed contemporaneously, since the
Pisan harpsichord of 1526 is continued down to F,
omitting the lowest Ffl and Gjf. Bb and Bfi are,
of course, there. When, in the last century, the
C short octaves were made long, it was by carrying
down the G and A, and giving back the semitonal
value to the B and CjJ (sometimes also the Djf);
but G jf was not introduced, since it was never re
quired as a dominant. The dominants had some
times given way to semitones as early as the I4th
and 1 5th centuries.
What was then the original intention of 'short
measure'? We find it indicated in Mersenne's
Psaltery (G C D E F G A Bb C d e f g) and in
many delineations of Portatives or Regals in pic
tures of the old masters, whose sincerity, seeing
the accurate manner in which they have painted
lutes, cannot be questioned. We will confine
our references to Orcagna's 'Coronation of the
Virgin' (1350), in the National Gallery, London,
and Master Stephen's 'Virgin of the Rosary'
(1450), at Cologne, with the Holyrood picture
of 1484, already referred to as an illustration of
a Positive organ with short measure. May not
Dr. Hopkins's quotation [ORGAN, vol. ii. p. 585]
of two long pipes in an organ of 1418 count as
evidence for short measure as much as for pedals?
We think so. In fine we regard short measure
as having been intended to supply, in deeper toned
instruments, dominants for cadences, and in the
shriller regals (which were no more than boxes of
pitch-pipes, one, two, or three to a key), to prompt
the intonation of the plainsong. The contraction
of the keyboard, whether diatonic or chromatic,
to suit the size of the hand, was probably due to
these small instruments — <
Orgues avait bien maniables,
A une seulle main, portables,
Ou il mei mes souffle et touche.
Roman de la Eose.
The contraction to the short octave measure
might have been intended to get rid of the
weight of the heavier pipes not needed for
dominants or intonation, and, at the same time,
keep the keyboard narrow. Both contractions—
the keyboard and the short measure — were thus
ready made for the spinet, harpsichord and clavi
chord, when they came into use.
The short octave group was -finally partially
doubled, so as to combine with the dominant
1 But not ' Ottava Kubata,' which some inaccurately apply to the
lowest octave of the short octave manual. This is a contrivance in
small organs with pedals to disguise the want of the lowest diapason
octave on the manual, by coupling on to it the contrabasso of the
pedals with the register of the octave above.
SPINET.
fourths the ordinary chromatic scheme, by dividing
the lowest sharps or chromatics, of which there
is an example in a spinet by Pleyer or Player
made bet ween 1710 and 17 20, exhibited by Messrs!
Kirkman at S. Kensington in 1872. This instru-
ment, with black naturals, and apparently 4!
octaves from B to D, has the lowest Cjf and Djf
divided, called in the quotation in the Catalogue
(p. 12) 'quarter tones.' But it is difficult to
imagine enharmonic intervals provided for the
deepest notes. We believe it to have been
intended for a 'short octave,' and to be thus
explained : —
Eb
^
CJF
Apparent notes B C D E
Cj_ 'Eb_
A B
Real notes G C D E,
Db Eb
or Apparent notes B C D E
A JL
"Ci Eb
Real notes G C D E
A spinet by Keene, dated 1685, in possession
of Mr. H. J. Dale, Cheltenham, and one by the
same maker belonging to Mr. E. R. Hughes, of
Chelsea, have the same apparently enharmonic
arrangement. One by Player (sic}, lately sent
to South Kensington (1882), is to be included
with Messrs. Kirkman's and the Keenes, and
also a Player which belongs to Mr. Amps of
Cambridge ; but a Keene of Mr. Grove's, undated,
has not the cut sharps, which we are disposed
to regard as for mixed dominants and chromatics,
because the independent keynote value of the
chromatics was, about A.D. 1700, beginning to be
recognised, and the fretted clavichords were soon
to give way to those without frets. It was the
dawn of Bach, who set all notes free as tonics.
We see in Keene and Player's spinets the blending
of old and new, that which was passing away
and our modern practice.
Returning to the Spinetta Traversa, we find
this model preferred in England in the Stuart
epoch, and indeed in fashion for 150 years. Ihe
favourite makers during the reigns of Charles I.
and II. were John and Thomas Hitchcock and
Charles Haward,2 but there is an unaccountable
difference between John Hitchcock's and Charles
Haward's spinets in the fine specimens known
to the writer, both the property of Mr. William
Dale of London, the latter of much older char
acter, though probably made subsequent to the
former.
2 The statement in HARPSICHORD that there was no independent
harpsichord-making apart from organ-building in England d
the 17th century is now contradicted by the fact of these spinel-
makers having also made harpsichords, 'harpsicous' as theMgiisn
then preferred to call them. There is a harpsichord of 5 octaves
by John Hitchcofk in the possession of Mr. W. J. Legh ot Lyrae.
Cheshire. It is without date, but is numbered inside 3.
John Hitchcock spinet is numbered inside 21 and dated 1830.
Sam or Sams, apparently a workman's, is found in both instrumeu
SPINET.
Thomas Hitchcock's spinets are better known
than John's. The one in the woodcut belongs to
Messrs. Broadwood, and is numbered 1379.* (The
highest number we have met with of Thomas
Hitchcock, is 1547.) Messrs. Broad wood's differs
SPINET.
655
from the John Hitchcock one of 1630 in having
a curved instead of an angular bent side, and
from the naturals being of ivory instead of ebony.
The compass of these instruments — five octaves,
from Gr to G — is so startling as to be incredible,
were it not for the facts that several instruments
are extant with this compass, that the key
board did not admit of alteration, and that the
Sainsbury Correspondence [see RUCKERS, p. 196 a]
mentions the greater compass that obtained in
England in the time of Charles I. than was
expected or required on the Continent. The
absence also of the soundhole, regarded as essen
tial in all stringed instruments of that time,
where the soundboard covered the whole inter
nal space, shows how eminently progressive the
Hitchcocks must have been. Not so Haward, in
the only instrument (that here represented) which
we have been so fortunate as to meet with by
this maker. Chas. Haward appears to have been
1 This is the instrument in Mr. Millais' picture of 'The Minuet,'
'862. Thomas dated his spiuets ; John numbered them.
contemporary with the Hitchcocks, and yet he is
as conservative to old Italian or French practice
as if John Hitchcock had never made an instru
ment in England. A John Hitchcock spinet,
dated 1676, has lately come under our notice.
John and Thomas were probably brothers. The
Charles Haward spinet is small, with short keys
and limited compass, being only of 4 octaves and
a semitone, B — C. The naturals are of snake-
wood, nearly black ; the sharps of ivory. There
are wires on each bridge over which the strings
pass, and along the hitchpin block, precisely the
same as in a dulcimer. The decoration of the
soundboard, surrounding an Italian rose, is
signed 'I H/ with 'Carolus Haward Fecit'
above the keys ; and the name of each key is
distinctly written, which we shall again have
occasion to refer to. Pepys patronised Haward
(or Hayward as he sometimes writes the name).
We read in his Diary —
April 4, 1668. To White Hall. Took Aldgate Street
in my way and there called upon one Hayward thab
makes Virginalls, and there did like of a little espinette,
and will have him finish it for me : for I had a mind to
a small harpsiehon, but this takes up less room.
July 10, 1G68. To Haward's to look upon an Espin
ette, and I did come near to buying one, but broke off.
I have a mind to have one.
July 13, 1668. I to buy my espinette, which I did
now agree for, and did at Haward's meet with Mr.
Thacker, and heard him. play on the harpsiehon, so as I
never heard man before, I think.
July 15, 1668. At noon is brought home the espinette
I bought the other day of Haward ; costs me 51.
Another reference concerns the purchase of
Triangles for the spinet — a three-legged stand, as
in our illustration. A curious reference to Charles
Hawavd occurs in ' A Vindication of an Essay to
the advancement of Musick,' by Thomas Salmon,2
M.A., London, 1672. This writer is advocating
a new mode of notation, in which the ordinary
clefs were replaced by B. (bass), M. (mean), and
T. (treble) at the signatures :
Here, Sir, I must acquaint you in favour of the afore
said B. M. T. that t'other day I met with a curious pair
of Phanatical Harpsechords made by that Arch Heretick
Charles Haward, which were ready cut out into octaves
(as I am told he abusively contrives all his) in so much
that by the least hint of B. M. T. all the notes were
easily found as lying in the same posture in every one
of their octaves. And that, Sir, with this advantage,
that so soon as the scholar had learned one hand he
xinderstood them, because the position of the notes were
for both the same.
The lettering over the keys in Mr. W. Dale's
Haward spinet is here shown to be original. It is
2 SALMON, THOMAS, born at Hackney, Middlesex, in 1648, was on
April 8, 1664, admitted a commoner of Trinity College, Oxford. He
took the degree of M.A. and became rector of Mepsal [Meppershall ?],
Bedfordshire. In 1672 he published 'An Essay to the Advancement
of Musick, by casting away the perplexity of different Cliffs, and
uniting all sorts of Musick in one universal character.' His plan was
that the notes should always occupy the same position on the stave,
without regard as to which octave might be used ; and he chose such
position from that on the bass stave— i. e. G was to be always on the
lowest line. Removing the bass clef, h'e substituted for it the capital
letter B, signifying Bass. In like manner he placed at the beginning
of the next stave the letter M (for Mean), to indicate that the notes
were to be sung or played an octave higher than the bass ; and to
the second stave above prefixed the letter T (for Treble), to denote
that the notes were to be sounded two octaves above the bass.
Matthew Lock criticised the scheme with great asperity, and the
author published a 'Vindication' of it, to which Lock and others
replied. [See LOCK, MATTHEW.] In 1688 Salmon published 'A Pro
posal to perform Music in Perfect and Mathematical Proportions,'
which, like his previous work, met with no acceptance. LW.H.H.]
656
SPINET.
very curious however to observe Haward's simple
alphabetical lettering, and to contrast it with the
Hexachord names then passing away. There
is a virginal (oblong spinet) in York Museum,
made in 1651 by Thomas White, on the keys of
which are monograms of Gainaut (bass G) and
the three clef keys F fa ut, C sol fa ut, and
G sol re ut \
Mace, in ' Musick's Monument ' (London, 1676),
refers to John Hay ward as a ' harpsichon ' maker,
and credits him with the invention of the Pedal
for changing the stops. There was a spinet by
one of the Haywards or Hawards left by Queen
Anne to the Chapel Royal boys. It was used as
a practising instrument until the chorister days
of the late Sir John Goss, perhaps even later.
Stephen Keene was a well-known spinet-maker
in London in the reign of Queen Anne. His
spinets, showing mixed Hitchcock and Haward
features, accepting Mr. Hughes's instrument as
a criterion, reached the highest perfection of
spinet tone possible within such limited dimen
sions. The Baudin spinet, dated 1/23, which
belonged to the late Dr. Rimbault, and is en
graved in his History of the Pianoforte, p. 69, is
now in the possession of Mr. Taphouse of Oxford.
Of later iSth-century spinets we can refer to a
fine one by Mahoon, dated 1747, belonging to
Mr. W. H. Cummings, and there is another by
that maker, who was a copyist of the Hitchcock s,
at S. Kensington Museum. Sir F. G. Ouseley
owns one by Haxby of York, 1766; and there
is one by Baker Harris of London, 1776, in the
Music School at Edinburgh. Baker Harris's
were often sold by Longman & Broderip, the
predecessors in Cheapside of dementi & Collard.
It is not surprising that an attempt should have
been made, while the pianoforte was yet a novelty,
to construct one in this pleasing wing-shape.
Crang Hancock, of Tavistock Street, Covent Gar
den, made one in 1782 which was long in the
possession of Mr. Walter Broadwood. It is now
at Godahning. [A.J.H.]
SPIRITOSO, i.e. 'spiritedly,' is, like CON SPI-
EITO, a designation of style rather thaji of pace.
It is occasionally met with in Haydn, rarely in
Mozart, and in not one of Beethoven's original
works. In his many arrangements of national
airs 'Spirituoso' occurs not unfrequently, as in
op. 107, no. 10; op. 108, nos. 13, 22 ; but he pro
bably found it on the copies sent him. Brahms,
with a touch of wonted conservatism, uses Con
Spirito in the Finale of his 2nd Symphony. [G.]
SPITTA, JULIUS AUGUST PHILIPP, a well-
known musical litterateur, son of the author of
the 'Psalter und Harfe ' ; born at Wechold,
Hanover, Dec. 27, 1841 ; studied at Gottingen,
and afterwards taught at Reval, Sondershausen,
and Leipzig, where he took part in the founding
of the Bachverein in 1874. So great was his
progress during this time, that in 1875 he was
made Professor of Musical history in the Berlin
university, and Perpetual Secretary to the Aca
demy of Arts there. At Easter of the same
year he became teacher of musical History in
SPOFFORTH.
the Hochschule fur Musik ; in 1876 entered
the direction, and at midsummer 1882 became a
permanent director of that establishment. His
principal literary work is a Life of J. S. Bach
in 2 vols. (B. & H. ; vol. i. 1873, v°l- "• 1880)
—an accurate and perfectly exhaustive treatise
of all relating to the subject, but sadly wanting
a better index.1 He has published a smaller bio°
graphy of the same master, forming No. i of
Breitkopf & Hartel's ' Musikalische Vortra^e/
and another of Schumann, which, though issued
as nos. 37, 38 of the same series, was written for
this Dictionary. [See vol. iii. pp. 384-421.] His
article on SPONTINI, in this work, is the first
adequate treatment of that singular individual.
An article on Homilius will be found in the Allg.
Deutsche Biographic, and many other produc
tions of his pen in the Leipzig Allg. Musikalische
Zeitung for 1875-78, 1880-82, and in the earlier
numbers of Eitner's ' Monatsheft fur Musikge-
schichte.' His critical edition of the organ works
of Buxtehude in 2 vols. (B. & H. 1875, 76),
is an admirable specimen of editing, and, in ad
dition to the music, contains much valuable
information. [G.]
SPITZFLOTE, SPITZFLUTE; i.e. Pointed
flute. An organ stop, so called because its pipes
are slightly conical, that is, taper gradually from
the mouth upwards. The diameter of the top
is generally one-third of that of the pipe at its
mouth. The tone is thin and reedy, but pure
and effective. The Spitzflote may be of 8 ft.,
4 ft., or 2 ft. pitch ; in this country stops of this
kind are most commonly of 4 ft. pitch. [J. S.]
SPOFFORTH, REGINALD, glee composer, born
1768 at Southwell, Nottingham, where his
uncle, Thomas Spofforth, was organist of the
minster. From him and from Dr. Benjamin
Cooke he probably derived all his instruction in
music. About 1787 or 1788 he wrote a glee—
probably his first — for three male voices, 'Lightly
o'er the village green,' and in 1793 obtained
two prizes from the ' Glee Club,' for his glees
' See ! smiling from the rosy East,' and 'Where
are those hours,' which brought him prominently
forward. About 1 799 he published a ' Set of Six
Glees,' one of which, 'Hail, smiling morn/ at
once caught the public ear, and has ever since
retained its popularity. Another, "'Fill high
the grape's exulting stream,' gained a prize in
1810. Spofforth's masterpieces however are not
among his prize glees, and 'Come, bounteous
May,' 'Mark'd you her eye,' 'Health to my
dear,' and 'How calm the evening'— all for
male voices— are among the finest specimens of
his genius. Few English composers perhaps
have excelled Spofforth in lively fancy, joined
to pure chaste style. For several years before
his death his health was bad, and he died at
Kensington Sept. 8, 1827. After his death \V.
Hawes published a [number of his MS. _ glees,
but some of these pieces are crude and imper
fect, and probably not intended for publication.
i An English translation is announced by Messrs. Novello & Co.
SPOFFORTH.
Reginald's younger brother, SAMUEL, was born
in 1780, appointed organist of Peterborough
Cathedral when only eighteen, and in 1807 was
made organist of Lichfield Cathedral. He died
June 6, 1864, and is now best known as the com
poser of a once popular chant. [D.B.]
SPOHR, Louis,1 great violinist and famous
composer, was born April 25, 1784, at Brunswick",
in the house of his grandfather, «i clergyman.
Two years after, his father, a young physician,
took up his residence at Seesen, and it was there
that young Spohr spent his early childhood.
Both parents were musical: the lather played
the flute; the mother was pianist and singer.
The boy showed his musical talent very early,
and sang duets with his mother when only four
years of age. At five he began to play the violin,
and when hardly six was able to take the violin-
part in Kalkbrenner's trios. His first teachers
were Eiemenschneider and Dufour. The latter,
a French e'migre', was so much impressed with
his pupil's exceptional talent, that he persuaded
the father to send him for further instruction to
Brunswick. Along with his first studies on the
violin went his earliest attempts at composition,
which consisted chiefly of violin duets. The
father, a strict, methodical man, invariably in
sisted on his properly finishing everything he
began to write, and would allow neither cor
rections nor erasures — a wholesome discipline,
the advantage of which Spohr throughout his
life never ceased to acknowledge.
At Brunswick he attended the grammar-school
and continued his musical studies. His teachers
were Kunisch, a member of the Duke's band, for
the violin, and Hartung, an old organist, for
counterpoint. The latter appears to have been a
great pedant, and young Spohr did not continue
to study under him for very long. Yet this was
the only instruction in the theory of music he ever
received. According to his own statement it was
principally through an eager study of the scores
of the great masters, especially Mozart, that he
acquired mastery over the technicalities of com
position. His first public appearance was at a
school-concert, when he played a concerto of his
own with so much success that he was asked to
repeat it at one of the concerts given by the
Duke's band. Kunisch then insisted on his
taking lessons from Maucourt, the leader of the
hand, and the best violinist at Brunswick. Spohr
was only fourteen when he undertook his
first artistic tour. With a few letters of intro
duction in his pocket he set out for Hamburg.
But there he failed even to get a hearing, and
after some weeks had to return to Brunswick on
foot, greatly disappointed, his slender means
thoroughly exhausted. In his despair he con
ceived the idea of presenting to the Duke a peti
tion asking for means to continue his studies.
The Duke was pleased with the lad's open
hearing, heard him, was struck with his talent,
at once gave him an appointment in his band,
and after a short time expressed his willing-
1 So, and not Ludwig, he calls himself in his Autobiography.
VOL. III. PT. 6.
SPOHE.
657
ness_ to defray the expenses of his further
musical education under one of the great recog
nised masters of the violin. Viotti and Ferdinand
Eck both declined to receive a pupil, but the
latter recommended his brother, Franz Eck,
who was just then travelling in Germany. He
was invited to Brunswick, and as the Duke
was greatly pleased with his performances, an
agreement was made that young Spohr should
accompany him on his journeys and receive his
instruction, the Duke paying one half of the
travelling expenses and a salary besides. In the
spring of 1802 they started, master and pupil, for
Russia. They made, however, prolonged stays at
Hamburg and Strelitz, and it was on these oc
casions that Spohr profited most from his master's
tuition. Latterly this became very irregular.
Spohr however derived much benefit from con
stantly hearing Eck, who certainly was a very
excellent violinist, though but an indifferent,
musician. At this period Spohr, who had an
herculean frame and very strong constitution,
often practised for 10 hours a day. At the same
time he composed industriously, and among other
things wrote the first of his published violin
concertos (op. i) which is entirely in the manner
of Rode, and also the violin duets op. 3. In St.
Petersburg he met dementi and Field, of whom
he tells some curious traits ; and after having
passed the winter there without playing in
public, returned to Brunswick in the summer
of 1803. There he found Rode, and heard him
for the first time. The playing of this great
master filled him with the deepest admiration, and
for some time it was his chief aim to imitate his
style and manner as closely as possible. After
having given in a public concert highly satisfac
tory proof of the progress made during his
absence, he again entered on his duties in the
Duke's band. An intended journey to Paris in
1804 was cruelly cut short by the loss of his
precious G-uarnerius violin, the present of a
Russian enthusiast. Just before entering the
gates of Gottingen the portmanteau containing
the violin was stolen from the coach, and all
endeavours to recover it proved fruitless. He
returned to Brunswick, and after having acquired,
with the help of his generous patron, the Duke,
another, though not equally good violin, he
started for a tour to Berlin, Leipzig, Dresden, and
other German towns. His success was every
where great, and his reputation spread rapidly.
At his Berlin concert he was assisted by Meyer
beer, then only a boy of 13, but already a bril
liant pianist.
In 1805 Spohr accepted the post of leader in
the band of the Duke of Gotha. It was there he
met and married his first wife, Dorette Scheidler,
an excellent harp-player, who for many years
appeared with him in all his concerts, and for
whom he wrote a number of sonatas for violin
and harp, as well as some solo-pieces. Having
at his disposal a very fair band, Spohr now
began to write orchestral works and vocal com
positions of larger dimensions. His first op.era,
' Die Prufung,' which belongs to this period,
Uu
658
SPOHR.
was performed at a concert. In 1807 he made
a very successful tour with his wife through Ger
many, visiting Leipzig, Dresden, Prague, Munich,
Stuttgardt (where he met Weber), Heidelberg,
and Frankfort. In 1808 he wrote his second
opera, ' Alrunrt,' but this again never reached the
stage, although accepted for representation at
Weimar and apparently gaining the approval of
Goethe, at that time manager of the Weimar
theatre, who was present at a trial-rehearsal of
the work. In the course of this year Napoleon
held the famous congress of princes at Erfurt.
Spohr, naturally anxious to see the assembled
princes, went to Erfurt, where a French troupe,
comprising Talma and Mars, performed every even
ing to a pit of monarchs. But on arrival he heard
to his great disappointment that it was impossible
for any but the privileged few to gain admittance
to the theatre. In this dilemma he hit on a
happy expedient. He persuaded the second horn-
player of the band to allow him to take his place,
but as he had never before touched a horn, he
had to practise for the whole day in order
to produce the natural notes of the instrument.
When the evening came, though his lips were
black and swollen, he was able to get through
the very easy overture and entr'actes. Napoleon
and his guests occupied the first row of stalls ;
but the musicians had strict orders to turn
their backs to the audience, and not to look round.
To evade this fatal regulation Spohr took with
him a pocket looking-glass, and by placing it on
his desk got a good view of the famous per
sonages assembled.
In 1809 he made another tour through the
north of Germany, and at Hamburg received a
commission for an opera, ' Der Zweikampf mit der
Geliebten' — or 'The Lovers' Duel' — which was
produced with great success the year after. At
this time he had already written six of his violin-
concertos, and as a player had hardly a rival
in Germany. The year 1809 is memorable for
the first Music Festival in Germany, which was
celebrated under Spohr's direction at Franken-
hausen, a small town in Thuringia. It was fol
lowed by another, in iSn, for which Spohr
composed his first symphony, in Eb. In 1812
he wrote his first oratorio, ' Das jiingste Gericht '
(not to be confounded with 'Die letzten Dinge,'
so well known in England as ' The Last Judg
ment), on the invitation of the French Governor
of Erfurt, for the 'Fete Napoldon' on Aug. 15.
He naively relates1 that in the composition of
this work he soon felt his want of practice in
counterpoint and fugue-writing ; he therefore ob
tained Marpurg's treatise on the subject, studied
it assiduously, wrote half a dozen fugues after
the models given therein, and then appears to
have been quite satisfied with his proficiency !
The oratorio was fairly successful, but after two
more performances of it at Vienna in the fol
lowing year, the composer became dissatisfied,
and laid it aside for ever. In autumn 1812
he made his first appearance at Vienna, and
achieved as performer a brilliant, as composer an
1 Selbstbiosr. i. 169.
SPOHR.
honourable success. The post of leader of the
band at the newly established Theatre an-der-Wien
being offered to him under brilliant conditions,
he gave up his appointment at Gotha and settled
at Vienna. During the next summer he com
posed his opera 'Faust,' one of his best works,
and soon afterwards, in celebration of the battle
of Leipsic, a great patriotic cantata. But neither
of these works was performed until after he had
left Vienna. During his stay there Spohr naturally
came into contact with Beethoven ; but in spite
of his admiration for the master's earlier compo
sitions, especially for the quartets, op. 18, which
he was one of the first to perform at a time when
they were hardly known outside Vienna (in
deed he was the very first to play them at Leipsic
and Berlin) — yet he was quite unable to un
derstand and appreciate the great composer's
character and works, as they appeared even in
his second period. His criticism of the C minor
and Choral Symphonies has gained for Spohr, as
a critic, an unenviable reputation. He disap
proves of the first subject of the C minor as un-
suited for the opening movement of a symphony;
considers the slow movement, granting the
beauty of the melody, too much spun out and
tedious — and though praising the Scherzo, ac
tually speaks of ' the unmeaning noise of the
Finale.' The Choral Symphony fares still worse :
he holds the first three movements, though not
without flashes of genius, to be inferior to all
the movements of the previous eight symphonies,
and the Finale he calls ' so monstrous and taste
less, and in its conception of Schiller's Ode so
trivial, that he cannot understand how a genius
like Beethoven could ever write it down.' After
this we cannot wonder that he finishes up by
saying : ' Beethoven was wanting in aesthetic
culture and sense of beauty.' 2 But perhaps no
great artist was ever so utterly wrapped up in
himself as Spohr. What he could not measure
by the standard of his own peculiar talent, to
him was not measurable. Hence his complete
absence of critical power, a quality which in
many other cases has proved to be by no means
inseparable from creative talent.
Although his stay at Vienna was on the whole
very successful, and did much to raise his
reputation, he left it in 1815, after having
quitted his appointment on account of dis
agreements with the manager of the theatre.
He passed the summer at the country seat of
Prince Carolath in Bohemia, and then went to
conduct another festival at Frankenhausen,
where he brought out his Cantata ' Das befreite
Deutschland,' after which he set out for a tour
through the west and south of Germany, Alsace,
Switzerland and Italy. On his road, with the
special view of pleasing the Italian public, he
wrote the 8th Concerto — the well-known 'Scena
Cantante.' He visited all the principal towns
of the Peninsula, played the concerto in Borne
B _. • •
and Milan, and made acquaintance with Kossu
and his music, without, as will be readily be
lieved, approving much of the latter.
2 Selbstbiogr. i. 202, etc.
SPOHR.
Returned to Germany, in 1817 he visited
Holland, and then accepted the post of conductor
of the opera at Frankfort-on- the- Main. Here,
in 1818, his opera 'Faust' was first produced.
It was quickly succeeded by ' Zemire and
Azor,' which, though hardly equal to ' Faust,'
gained at the time even greater popularity.
Owing again to differences with the manager he
left Frankfort, after a stay of scarcely two years.
In 1820 he accepted an invitation from the Phil
harmonic Society in London, and paid his first
visit to England. He appeared at the opening
concert of the season ( March 6), and played
•with great success his Concerto No. 8, ' Nello
Stilo clrammatico.' At the second concert he led
his Solo Quartet in E. At the next he would
naturally have been at the head of the violins to
lead the band, while Ries, according to the then
prevailing fashion, presided at the piano. But,
after having overcome the opposition of some of
the directors, Spohr succeeded in introducing the
conductor's stick for the first time into a Phil
harmonic concert. It was on this occasion that
he conducted his MS. Symphony in D minor,
a fine work, which he had composed during his
stay in London, and which fully deserved the
enthusiastic reception it received by the public
and the press, though now too seldom heard.1
At the last concert of the season another Sym
phony of his was played for the first time in
England, as well as his Nonetto for strings and
wind (op. 31). Spohr was delighted with the
excellent performance of the Philharmonic Or
chestra, especially the stringed instruments. He
tells us that, finding ho*vv good the strings were,
he had given them special opportunities for
display in the D minor Symphony, and also that
he had never since heard the work so splendidly
performed.2 Altogether his sojourn in London
was both artistically and financially a great suc
cess. At his farewell concert, his wife made her
last appearance as a harp-player, and was warmly
applauded. Soon after she was obliged, on ac
count of ill-health, to give up the harp. In its
place she took up pianoforte-playing, and would
occasionally play in concerts with her husband,
who wrote a number of pianoforte and violin
duets especially for her. She died in 1834.
On his journey home, Spohr visited Paris for
the first time. Here he made the personal ac
quaintance of Kreutzer, Viotti, Habeneck,
Cherubini, and other eminent musicians, and was
received by them with great cordiality and es
teem. His success at a concert which he gave at
the Opera was complete, although his quiet, un
pretentious style was not and could not be as
much to the taste of the French as it was to that
of the German and English public. Cherubini
appears to have felt a special interest in Spohr's
compositions, and the latter takes special pride
in relating how the great Italian made him play
a quartet of his three times over. Returned to
Germany, Spohr settled at Dresden, where Weber
1 It was a special favourite with Sterndale Bennett, who \vas never
tired of humming its spirited and melodious subjects.
2 Stjlbstbiogr. ii. 89.
SPOHR.
659
was just then engaged in bringing out his
' Freischtitz.' This opera had already roused an
unprecedented enthusiasm in Berlin and Vienna.
But Spohr was no more able to appreciate the
genius of Weber, than that of Beethoven. It
is an interesting fact, that shortly before this,
without knowing of Weber's opera, he had had
the intention of setting a libretto founded on the
identical story of Freischiitz. As soon however
as he heard that Weber treated the subject, he
gave it up. During Spohr's stay at Dresden,
Weber received an offer of the post of Hofkapell-
meister to the Elector of Hessen-Cassel ; but
being unwilling to leave Dresden, he declined,
at the same time strongly recommending Spohr,
who soon after was offered the appointment for
life under the most favourable conditions. On
New-year's day, 1822, he entered on his duties
at Cassel, where he remained for the rest of
his life. He had no difficulty in . gaining at
once the respect and obedience of band and
singers, and soon succeeded in procuring a more
than local reputation for their performances.
Meanwhile he had finished his ' Jessonda,'
which soon made the round of all the opera-
houses in Germany, with great and well-deserved
success. It must be regarded as the culmin
ating point of Spohr's activity as a composer.
At Leipzig and Berlin, where he himself con
ducted the first performances, it was received
with an enthusiasm little inferior to that roused
a few years before by the 'Freischiitz.' In
the winter of 1824 he passed some time in
Berlin, and renewed and cemented the friend
ship with Felix Mendelssohn and the members
of his family, which had been begun when they
visited him at Cassel in 1822. In 1826 he
conducted the Rhenish Festival at Diisseldorf,
when his oratorio ' The Last Judgment ' (Die
letzten Dinge) was performed for the first time.
It pleased so much that it was repeated a few
days later in aid of the Greek Insurgents.
His next great work was the opera ' Pietro
von Albano,' which however, like his next
operas, 'Der Berggeist ' and 'Der Alchymist,'
had but a temporary success. In 1831 he fin
ished his great Violin-School, which has ever
since its publication maintained the place of a
standard work, and which contains, both in text
and exercises, a vast amount of extremely in
teresting and useful material. At the same time,
it cannot be denied that it reflects somewhat
exclusively Spohr's peculiar style of playing, and
is therefore of especial value for the study of
his own violin-compositions. It is also true that
its elementary part is of less practical value from
the fact that the author himself had never taught
beginners, and so had no personal experience in
that respect.
The political disturbances of 1832 caused a
prolonged interruption of the opera-performances
at Cassel. Spohr, incensed by the petty despotism
of the Elector, proved himself at this time, and
still more during the revolutionary period of
1848 and 1849, a strong Radical, incurring there
by his employer's displeasure, and causing him
U u 2
660
SPOHR.
innumerable annoyances. However he made
good use of the interruption to his official duties,
by writing his great Symphony ' Die Weihe der
Tone' (The Consecration of Sound, no. 4, op. 86),
which was produced at Cassel in 1832. During
the next year, which was saddened by the
death of his wife, he composed the oratorio
' Des Heiland's letzte Stunden' (Calvary), on a
libretto which Rochlitz had offered to Mendels
sohn, but which the latter, being then engaged
on 'St. Paul,' had declined. Spohr's oratorio
was first performed at Cassel on Good Friday,
1835. In 1839 he paid his second visit to Eng
land, where meanwhile his music had attained
great popularity. He had received an invitation
to produce his ' Calvary ' at the Norwich Festi
val, and in spite of the opposition offered to
the work by some of the clergy on account of
its libretto, his reception appears to have sur
passed in enthusiasm anything he had before
experienced. It was a real success, and Spohr for
the rest of his life refers to it as the greatest
of his triumphs. Soon after his return to Cas
sel he received from Professor Edward Taylor
the libretto of another oratorio, 'The Fall of
Babylon,' with a request that he would compose
it for the Norwich Festival of 1842. In 1840
he conducted the Festival at Aix-la-Chapelle.
Two years later he brought out at Cassel Wag
ner's ' Der Fliegencle Hollander.' That Spohr,
who in the case of Beethoven and Weber, ex
hibited such inability to appreciate novelty —
and who at bottom was a conservative of con
servatives in music — should have been the very
first musician of eminence to interest himself
in Wagner's talent is a curious fact not easily
explained. To some extent his predilection for
experiments in music — such as he showed in
his ' Weihe der Tone,' his Symphony for two
orchestras, the Historic Symphony, the Quartet-
Concertante and some other things — may account
for it; while his long familiarity with the stage
had doubtless sharpened his perception for dra
matic effect, and thus enabled him to recognise
Wagner's eminently dramatic genius. But there
was in Spohr, both as man and as artist, a curious
mixture of the ultra-Conservative, nay almost
Philistine element, and of the Radical spirit.
To the great disappointment of himself and
his English friends, he was unable to conduct
the ' Full of Babylon ' at Norwich, since the
Elector refused the necessary leave of absence.
Even a monster petition from his English ad
mirers and a special request from Lord Aberdeen,
then at the head of the Government, to the
Elector, had not the desired result. His Serene
Highness at least felt safe from naval reprisals.
The oratorio however was performed with the
greatest success, and Spohr had to be satisfied
with the reports of his triumph, which poured
in from many quarters. On the first day of his
summer vacation, he started for England, and
soon after his arrival in London conducted a
performance of the new oratorio at the Hanover
Square Rooms. On this and other occasions his
reception here was of the most enthusiastic kind.
SPOHR.
The oratorio was repeated on a large scale by
the Sacred Harmonic Society in Exeter Hall.
The last Philharmonic Concert of the season (July
3) was almost entirely devoted to Spohr, having in
its programme a symphony, an overture, a violin-
concerto, and a vocal duet of his. By special
request of the Queen and Prince Albert an extra
concert with his co-operation was given on
July 10, in which also he was well represented.
A most enjoyable tour through the South and
West of England, and Wales, brought this visit
of Spohr's to a happy end.
The year 1844 was marked by the compo
sition of his last opera, ' Die Kreuzfahrer ' (The
Crusaders), for which he had himself arranged
the libretto from a play of Kotzebue. It was
performed at Cassel and Berlin, but had no
lasting success. During his vacations he made
a journey to Paris, and witnessed at the Ocleon
the 32nd performance of Mendelssohn's 'An
tigone.' The members of the Conservatoire
orchestra arranged in his honour a special per
formance of his ' Consecration of Sound.' In the
same year he conducted the 'Missa Solemm's'
and the Choral Symphony at the great Beethoven
Festival at Bonn. The year 1847 saw him
again in London, where the Sacred Harmonic
Society announced a series of three concerts for
the production of his principal sacred compo
sitions: 'The Fall of Babylon,' 'Calvary,' 'The
Last Judgment,' 'The Lord's Prayer,' and Mil
ton's 84th Psalm. However, on grounds similar
to those which had roused so much opposition at
Norwich, Calvary was omitted from the scheme,
and ' The Fall of Babylon ' repeated in its place.
On his return to Cassel, Spohr seems to have
been quite absorbed by the great political events
then going on in Germany. In the summer of
1848 he spent his vacations at Frankfort, where
the newly created German Parliament was sit
ting, and was never tired of listening to the
debates of that short-lived political assembly.
In 1 849 he composed a fresh symphony, ' The
Seasons' — his ninth. With 1850 a long chain of
annoyances began. When his usual summer va
cation time arrived, the Elector, probably intend
ing to show displeasure at his political opinions,
refused to sign the leave of absence — a mere
formality, as his right to claim the vacation was
fixed by contract. After several fruitless at
tempts to obtain the signature, Spohr, having
made all his arrangements for a long journey,
left Cassel without leave. This step involved
him in a law-suit with the administration of the
theatre, which lasted for four years, and which
he finally lost on technical grounds.
For the London season of 1852 Spohr had re
ceived an invitation from the new Opera at
Covent Garden to adapt his 'Faust' to the
Italian stage. He accordingly composed recita
tives in place of the spoken dialogue, and made
some further additions and alterations. It was
produced with great success under his own
direction on July i;, the principal parts being
sustained by Castellan, Ronconi, Formes, and
Tamberlik. In 1853, after many fruitless at-
SPOHR.
tempts, which were regularly frustrated by the
Elector, he at last succeeded in bringing- out
Wagner's ' Tannhauser ' at Cassel. In reference
to it he says in his Autobiography, ' this opera
contains a great deal that is new and beautiful,
but also some things which are ugly and ex
cruciating to the ear,' and speaking of the 2nd
finale he says : ' in this finale now and then
a truly frightful music is produced.' That he
considered Wagner by far the greatest of all
living dramatic composers he declared as soon as
he became acquainted with The Flying Dutch
man. From Tannhauser he would have pro
ceeded to Lohengrin, but owing to the usual
opposition of the court, all his endeavours to bring
it out were frustrated. In the same year he came
fur the sixth and last time to England, to fulfil an
enslavement at the New Philharmonic Concerts.
O O
At three of these he conducted not only many of
his own works — especially the Symphony for two
orchestras— but also the Choral Symphony. At
the same time Jessonda was in preparation at
Covent Garden. But as it could not be produced
before the close of his vacation, Spohr was un
able to conduct it himself.
From this time his powers began to decline.
He still went on composing, but declared him
self dissatisfied with the results. In 1857 ne
was pensioned off, very much against his wish,
and in the winter of the same year had the
misfortune to break his arm, which compelled
him to give up violin-playing. Once more, in
1858, at the celebration of the 5oth anniver
sary of the Prague Conservatorium, he con
ducted his Jessonda with wonderful energy. It
was his last public appearance. He died quietly
on Oct. 16, 1859, a^ Cassel, and thus closed the
long life of a man and an artist who had to
the full developed the great talents and powers
given to him ; who throughout a long career had
lived up to the ideal he had conceived in youth ;
in whom private character and artistic activity
corresponded to a rare degree, even in their
foibles and deficiencies. That these last were
not small cannot be denied. His utter want of
critical power, in reference both to himself and to
others, is fully exposed in his interesting Auto
biography,1 which however bears the strongest
possible testimony to his rare manly straightfor
wardness and sincerity in word and deed, and to
the childlike purity of mind which he preserved
from early youth to latest age. Difficult as it is
to understand his famous criticisms on Beethoven
and his interest for Wagner, their sincerity
cannot be doubted for a moment. According to
his lights he ever stood up for the dignity of
his art, with the same unflinching independence
of character with which he claimed, not without
personal risk, the rights of a free citizen. He
was born with an individuality so peculiar and
so strong as to allow hardly any influence to
outer elements. It is true that he called himself
a disciple of Mozart. But the universality of
Mozart's talent was the very reverse of Spohr's
1 'Louis Spohr's Selbstbiographie ; Cassel und Go'ttingen, G. H.
Wigand, laCO.' 2 vols., with portrait and 17 facsimiles.
SPOHR.
661
exclusive individualism ; and except in their great
regard for ' form,' and in a certahi similarity of
melodic structure, the two masters have hardly
anything in common. Spohr certainly was a
born musician, second only to the very greatest
masters in true musical instinct ; in power of
concentration and of work hardly inferior to
any. But the range of his talent was not wide :
he never seems to have been able to step out
of a given circle of ideas and sentiments, and
when he tried to enlarge his sphere, it was only
to get hold of the outer shell of things, which
he at once proceeded to fill with the old familiar
substance. He never left the circle of his in
dividuality, but drew everything within it. At
the same time it must be confessed that he left
much outside of that circle, and his ignorance
of the achievements of others was often astound
ing. This is illustrated by a well-authenticated
story. A pupil of his left him, and went for
some time to Leipzig to study the piano and other
branches of music. On his return to Cassel he
called on Spohr, and was asked to play to him.
The pupil played Beethoven's Sonata in E minor
op. 90. Spohr was much struck, and when the
piece was finished made the singular enquiry,
'Have you composed much more in that style,
Herr —
He was fond of experiments in composition-
such as new combinations of instruments (to wit
the Double Quartets, the Symphony for two or
chestras, the Quartet-Concerto, and others), or
adoption of programmes ('Consecration of Sound';
Concertino, 'Past and Present,' etc.), and thus
showed his eagerness to strike out new paths.
But after all, what do we find under these new
dresses and fresh-invented titles but the same dear
old Spohr, incapable of putting on a really new
face, even for a few bars? 'Napoleon,' says
Robert 2 Schumann (a propos to Spohr's Histori
cal Symphony), ' once went to a masked ball,
but before he had been in the room a few minutes
folded his arms in his well-known attitude. " The
Emperor! the Emperor!" at once ran through
the place. Just so, through the disguises of the
Symphony, one kept hearing " Spohr, Spohr" in
every corner of the room.' Hence there is consi
derable sameness — nay, monotony, in his works.
Be it oratorio or concerto, opera or string-quartet
— he treats them all very much in the same man
ner, and it is not so much the distinctive styles
peculiar to these several forms of music that we
find, as Spohr's peculiar individuality impressed
upon all of them. He certainly was not devoid of
originality — in fact his style and manner are so
entirely his own that no composer is perhaps
so absolutely unmistakeable as he is. That an
originality so strong and so inalienable, unless
supported by creative power of the very first
order and controlled by self-criticism, would
easily lead to mannerism is obvious ; and a man
nerist he must be called.
Certain melodious phrases and cadences, chro
matic progressions and enharmonic modulations,
in themselves beautiful enough, and most effective.
2 Gesammelte Schriften, iv. 89.
662
SPOHR.
occur over and over again, until they appear
to partake more of the nature of mechanical
contrivances than to be the natural emanations
of a living musical organism. His powers of
invention are by no means weak, and many
of his melodies have not only an indescribable
charm of sweet and tender melancholy, but are
of truly surpassing beauty. Modern critics are
in the habit of charging him with a want of
force and manliness, but it is difficult to see how
such a charge can be maintained in the face of
many of his best works, even if it be true in
regard to the less important ones. Surely there
is no want of manly vigour, or noble pathos,
in such pieces as the first Allegro of the Qth
Concerto, the Introduction to ' Jessonda,' some of
his symphony-movements, and many others that
might be named ! Such criticism, however fre
quent now-a-days, is probably only the natural
reaction from an unbounded and indiscrimin-
ating enthusiasm, which, in England at one
time, used to place Spohr on the same level with
Handel and Beethoven. These temporary fluc
tuations will, however, sooner or later subside,
and then his true position as a great master,
second in rank only to the very giants of art, will
be again established.
The technical workmanship in his compositions
is admirable, the thematic treatment his strong
point ; but it would appear that this was the
result rather of a happy musical organisation
than of deep study. He cannot be reckoned
amongst the great masters of counterpoint, and
the fugues in hia oratorios, though they run
smoothly enough and are in a sense effective,
can hardly be called highly interesting from a
musical point of view.
Symmetry of form is one of the chief char
acteristics of his works; but this love of symmetry
grew eventually into a somewhat pedantic form
alism. A cadence without its preceding 'passage
and shake ' he is reported to have held in ab
horrence. His instrumentation shows the master
hand throughout, although his predilection for
extreme keys presents much difficulty to the
wind-instruments, and sometimes, especially in
his operas, the orchestra is wanting in perspicuity,
and not free from monotony.
To his violin-concertos — and among them
especially to the yth, 8th, and pth — must be
assigned the first place among his works. They
are only surpassed by those of Beethoven and
Mendelssohn, and are probably destined to live
longer than any other of his works. They are
distinguished as much by noble and elevated ideas
as by masterly thematic treatment ; while the
supreme fitness of every note in the solo-part to
the nature of the violin, need hardly be men
tioned. They are not likely to disappear soon
from the repertoires of the best violinists.
His duets and concertantes for two violins,
and for violin and viola, are of their kind unsur
passed. By the frequent employment of double
stops great sonority is produced, and, if well
plaved, the effect is charming.
The mass of his chamber-music, a great number
SPOHR.
of quartets, quintets, double quartets, trios, etc.,
is now-a-days but rarely heard in public. Though
still favourites with amateurs of the older gener
ation, they are, with few exceptions, all but un
known to the musicians of the present day. The
reason for this must be found in the fact that a
severer standard of criticism is applied to chamber-
music in general, and especially to the stringed
quartet, than to any other form of musical com
position, not even excepting the symphony. In
orchestral music effects of sound and tone-colouring
—distinct from pure musical ideas — play an un
deniable and important part ; but in the stringed
quartet, the means of representation are so limited,
and the perspicuity is such, that anything not
absolutely essential to the musical thought — any
thing in the way of mere effect or 'padding' —
cannot be introduced without at once betraying
superfluity and weakness of construction. The
stringed quartet may well be compared to an
outline-drawing in which every line must tell,
and in which no colouring or effects of light and
shade can atone for weakness of design or execu
tion. Hence none but the very greatest masters
have succeeded in producing lasting works of this
class. Spohr as a composer of quartets was
rarely able to shake off the great violin-virtuoso.
Some of the quartets — the so-called Quatuors
brillants or Sfllo Quartets — are avowedly violin-
concertos accompanied by violin, viola and
violoncello, and appear to have been written to
supply a momentary want. And even those
which claim to be quartets in the proper sense
of the term, almost invariably give to the first
violin an undue prominence, incompatible with
the true quartet-style. The quick movements
especially are full of showy and florid passages
for the leading instrument ; and the finales are
not unfrequently written in a somewhat anti
quated rondo-style (a la Polacca). On the other
hand, many of the slow movements are of great
beauty ; and altogether, in spite of undeniable
drawbacks, his quartets contain so much fine
and noble music as certainly not to deserve the
utter neglect they have fallen into.
Among them, that in G minor (op. 27), dedi
cated to Count Rasoumoffsky ; the three quartets
in Eb, C, and F (op. 29), dedicated to Andreas
Romberg, and the earlier double quartets, are
perhaps the finest. They belong to a period
when Spohr's powers as a composer were fully
developed, and the mannerism of his later years
not yet so conspicuous.
Of his symphonies, the 2nd, in D minor, the
3rd, in C minor (with the famous unison passage
in the slow movement), and especially the 4th,
'The Consecration of Sound' are still occasionally
heard at concerts. They are truly original and
beautiful works, and too well known to require
further comment.
His operas and oratorios have already been dis
cussed under those headings in this Dictionary.
They rank high among Spohr's compositions: in
some parts showing true greatness of conception,
breadth of sentiment, and even remarkable power
of characterisation. We will only mention the
SPOHR.
grand Introduction to ' Jessonda' and theWitches
scene in Faust. Some of the airs and duets in
these and others of his operas are perfect gems
of melody and gracefulness. His oratorios, still
enjoying a certain popularity in England, are
hut rarely heard in other countries. They con
tain no doubt much beautiful music, and occa
sionally rise even to grandeur and sublimity.
Yet one cannot help feeling a certain incon-
oruity between the character of the words and
their musical treatment — between the stern
solemnity of such subjects as ' Calvary' or ' the
Last Judgment' and the quiet charm and sweet
ness of Spohr's music, which even in its most
powerful and passionate moments lacks the all-
conquering force here demanded.
Of his many songs a few only have attained
great popularity, such as ' The Maiden and the
Bird,' and some more. — A characteristic specimen
of his peculiar way of writing for pianoforte, and
at the same time of his extreme mannerism, is
given in the PF. solo sonata, op. 125, dedicated
to Mendelssohn.
As an executant Spohr counts amongst the
greatest of all times. Through Franz Eck he
received the solid principles of the Mannheim
School, and Rode's example appears afterwards to
have had some influence on his style. He was
however too original to remain fettered by any
school, still less under the influence of a definite
model. He very soon formed a style of his own,
which again — like his style as a composer — was
a complete reflex of his peculiar individuality. It
has often been remarked that he treated the violin
pre-eminently as a singing instrument, and we
c;m readily believe that the composer of the Scena
Cantante and of the slow movements in the 9th
and other Concertos, played with a breadth and
beauty of tone and a delicacy and refinement of ex
pression almost unequalled. A hand of exceptional
size and strength enabled him to execute with
great facility the most difficult double-stops and
stretches. His manner of bowing did not mate
rially differ from that of the old French School
(Viotti, Rode). Even in quick passages he pre
served a broad fall tone. His staccato was most
brilliant and effective, moderately quick, every
note firmly marked by a movement of the wrist.1
The lighter and freer style of bowing, that came
in with Paganini, and has been adopted more or
less by all modem players, was not to his taste.
He appears to have had a special dislike to the
use of the ' springing bow,' and it is a character
istic fact that, when he first brought out Men
delssohn's Midsummer Night's Dream Overture
at Cassel, he insisted on the violins playing the
quick passage at the opening with firm strokes.
If Spohr's compositions for the violin do not
present abnormal difficulties to the virtuoso of the
present day — such was not the case at the time
when they were written. They were then con
sidered the ne plus ultra of difficulty. We
must also remember that he was too great an
1 An amusing and characteristic passage in his Autobiography (ii.
203) relates the pleasure with which Mendelssohn drew his sister's
attention to this staccato, in the Concertino in E, in 1834.
SPOHR.
663
artist and musician to care for display of execu
tive skill for its own sake, and that in consequence
the difficulties contained in his works do not by
any means represent the limit of his powers as
an executant. He had a large number of pupils,
the best known of whom are St. Lubin, Pott,
Ferd. David, Kompel, Blagrove, Bott, Bargheer.
Henry Holmes belongs to his school, but was
never his pupil. Spohr was considered one of
the best conductors of his time. An unerring
ear, imperturbable rhythmical feeling, energy and
fire, were combined with an imposing personal
appearance and great dignity of bearing.
As a man he was universally respected, although,
owing to a certain reserve in his character and
a decided aversion to talking, he has not rarely
been reproached with coldness and brusqueness
of manner. At the same time he gained and
kept through a long life certain intimate friend
ships — with Hauptmann2 and others — and in
many instances showed great kindness, and ex
tended not a little courtesy, to brother artists.
That this was not incompatible with an extra
ordinary sense of his own value and importance
is evident in every page of his Autobiography, a
most amusing work, deserving a better transla
tion than it has yet found.3
His works, of which a catalogue is given below,
comprise 9 great Symphonies ; a large number of
Overtures ; 1 7 Violin-Concertos and Concertinos ;
many other Concert pieces (Potpourris, Varia
tions, etc.) for the violin, for violin and harp ;
15 Violin-Duets ; Duets for violin and PF. ; 4
Concertos and other pieces for clarinet ; 33 String
Quartets ; 8 Quintets ; 4 Double Quartets ; 5 PF.
Trios ; 2 Sextets ; an Octet ; and a Nonet ,• 4 great
Oratorios ; a Mass ; several Psalms and Cantatas ;
10 Operas ; a great many Songs, Part-Songs and
other vocal pieces — over 200 works in all.
Catalogue of Spohr s printed WorJcs.
Founded on the Catalogue edited by H. M. Schlet-
terer (B. & H., iSSi).4
Op.l. Concerto for Violin (no. 1,
Amin.)- B. & H.
2. Concerto forV. (no. 2, D min.).
Feters.
3. 3 Duos Concertants for 2 V.
Peters.
4. 2 String Quartets (C, G).
Feters.
5. First Potpourri on Air of
Dalayrac fur V. with ace.
of 2nd V., Viola, and Bass.
Peters.
6. Variations (no. 1, D) for V.
solo, 2nd V.,Viola, and Bass.
Peters.
7. Concerto for V. (no. 3, C min.).
Peters.
8. Variations (no. 2, A min.) for
V. solo, 2nd V., Viola, and
Bass. Peters.
9. 2 Duos Concertants for 2 V.
(nos. 4, 5). Peters.
10. Concerto for V. (no. 4, B min.).
Simrock.
11. Quatuor Brillant lor 2 V.,
Viola, and Cello (no. 3, D
rnin.). Simrock.
12. Overture (no. 1, C min.). Sim-
rock.
13. Grand Duo for V. and Viola
(no. G). Peters.
14. *
15. 2 String Quartets (nos. 4, 5 ;
C, A). Peters.
loa. Overture (no. 2, D), ' Die
Priifung.' Simrock.
16. Grande Senate for PF. (or
Harp) and V.-(B). Simrock.
17. Concerto for V. (no. 5, Eb).
NSgeli.
18. *
19. *
20. First Symphony (Eb). Peters.
21. Overture (no. 3, E b), 'Alruna.'
Hof'meister.
22. Potpourri on themes of Mo
zart (no. 2, Bb) for V. with
ace. of 2nd V., Viola, and
Bass. Andre.
2 Hauptmann's letters to Spohr have been published by Fchoene
and Killer. 3 • Louis Spohr's Autobiography.' Longmans. 186o.
4 An earlier catalogue, imperfect but very useful i
that of Jantzen-' Verze'chniss,' etc. Cassel, Luckhardt.
* Unknown and not to be found in Schletterer's Catalogue. Prul
ably represented by works left in manuscript.
664
SPOHR.
SPONDEE.
Op. 23. Potpourri on themes of Mo
zart (no. 3, G) lor V. with
ace. of Quartet, Flute, Oboe
Clarinet, 2 Bassoons, and 2
Horns. Andre1.
24. Potpourri on Themes of Mo
zart (no. 4, B) for V. with
ace. of 2nd V., Viola, and
Bass. Andre".
2!5. 6 German Songs. Mecchetti.
~\. Concerto for Clarinet (110. 1
C min.). Peters.
27. Quartet for 2 V., Viola, and
Violonc. (no. 6, G min.)
Mecchetti.
23. Concerto for V. (no.6, G min.)
Haslinger.
29. 3 String Quartets (nos. 7, 8, 9
E b, C min., Jf min.). lias-
linger.
30. String Quartet (no. 10, A)
Haslinger.
81. Grand Nonetto (F maj.) for
V.. Viola, Cello. Bass, Flute
Oboe, Clarinet, Bassoon, ant
Horn. Haslinger.
32. Octet (E maj.) for V., 2 Violas
Cello, Clarinet, 2Horns, and
Bass. Haslinger.
33. 2 Quintets for 2 V., 2 Violas
and Cello (no. 1, Eb ; no. 2
G). Haslinger.
84. Notturno (in C) for wind In
struments and Turklsl
band. Peters.
55. Fantasia for Harp (Ab). Sim-
rock.
36. Variations for Harp (F). Sim-
rock.
S7. 6 German Songs (2nd book o!
Songs). Peters.
33. Concerto for V. (no. 7, E min.)
Peters.
39. 3 Duets for V. (nos. 7, 8, 9
D min., Eb, E). Peters.
40. Grande Polonaise (A min.)
for V. with Orch. Peters.
41. C German Songs (3rd book o
Songs). Peters.
42. Potpourri. Arrangement for
V. and PF. of op. 24. Peters
43. Quatuor Brillant for stringec
instr. (no. 11, E). Peters.
44. G 4-part Songs for male voices,
Peters.
45. 3 String Quartets (nos. 12, 13
14; C.. Em.,F. m.). Peters
4G. Introduction and Rondo (E;
lor PF. and V. Mecchetti.
47. Concerto for V. no. 8, A min.
' In modo d'una Scena can-
tante.'
48. First Concertante fur 2 V. and
Orch. (A min.). Peters.
49. Second Symphony (D min.)
Ded. to Philarmonic So
ciety. Peters.
50. Potpourri (F# min.) for V.
and PF. on Airs from ' Die
Zauberflo'.e.' Peters.
51. Grand Bondo for V. end PF.
concertants. Peters.
52. Quintet for PF., Flute, Clari
net, Horn, and Bassoon
(C min.). Peters.
53. A rrangement of op. 52 for PF.
and stringed instr. Peters.
54. Mass for 5 Solo Voices and 2
5-part Choirs. Peters.
55. Concerto for V. (no. 9, D min.).
Andre*.
£6. Potpourri for V. and PF. on
Airs from ' The Interrupted
Sacrifice.' Peters.
57. Concerto for Clarinet (no. 2,
Eb). Peters.
53. 3 String Quartets (nos. 16, 17,
18; Eb, A min., G). Peters.
59. Potpourri (A min.) on Irish
Airs for V. and Orch.
London.
60. Faust, Opera. Peters.
61. Quatuor Brillant for stringed
instr. (no. 15, B min.). Pe
ters.
62. Concerto forV.(no.!0,A min.).
Peters.
63. ' Jessonda,' Opera. Peters.
W. Potpourri (As) on Airs Irom
'Jessonda,' for V. and Cello
with Orch. Peters.
65. Double String Quartet (no. 1,
D min.). Peters.
66. Potpourri (A min.) on Airs
from ' Jessonda,' for V. and
Orch. Peters.
67. 3 Duos Concertants for 2 V.
(nos. 10, 11, 12; A mia., D,
G min.). Peters.
63. Quatuor Brillaut (no. 19, A).
Peters.
G9. Quintet for stringed instr
(no. 3, B min.). Peters.
70. Concerto for V. (no. 11, G).
Peters.
71. Scena and Aria for Soprano
Peters.
72. 6 German Bongs (Book 4 of
Songs). Peters.
73. 'DerBerggeist.'Opera. Peters.
74. 8 String Quartets (nos. 20, 21,
22; A miu., Bb, D min.).
Peters.
75. Overture, ' Macbeth '(Bmin.).
Peters.
70. 'Pietro von Albano,' Opera.
Schleslnger.
77. Double Quartet for stringed
instr.(no.2.Eb). Schleslnger.
78. Third Symphony (G miu.).
Schlesinger.
79. Concertino for V. (A min.).
Schlesinger.
SO. Potpourri for Clarinet (F).
81. Fantasia and Variations for
Clarinet (Bb). Schlesinger.
£2. 3 String Quartets (nos. 23. 24.
25; E, G. A min.). Schle
singer.
83. Quatuor Brillant for stringed
Instr. (no. 20, Et). Schle
singer.
84. 3 String Quartets (nos. 27. 28,
29; D min.. Ab, B min.).
Andre".
86. 3 Psalms for Double Choir and
Solo Voices. Simrock.
8G. Fourth Symphony, 'The Con
secration of Sound.' Has
linger.
67. Double Quartet for stringed
instr. (no. 3, E min.). Sim-
rock.
88. Second Concertante for 2 V.
with Orch. Simrock.
89. 'Erinnerung an Marienbad.'
Valses for Orch. (A min.).
Haslinger.
90. 6 4-part Songs for Male Voices.
Hamburg, Niemeyer.
91. Quintet lor stringed instr.
(no. 4, G min.). Simrock.
92. Concertino for V. (no. 2,
E maj.). B. & H.
93. Quatuor Brillant for stringed
instr. (no. SO, A min.).
Haslinger.
91. G Songs for Contralto or
Baryton (Book 5 of Songs).
Simrock.
95. Duo Concertant for PF. and
V. (Gmin.). B. & H.
9G. Duo Concertant for PF. and
V. (F). Simrock.
97. Hymn, 'St. Caecilia.' Chorus,
Soprano Solo. Luckhardt.
97 a. Psalm 24, for Chorus. Solo
Voices, and PF. Unpub
lished.
98. Hymne, 'Gott du bist gross"
(God, thou art great), for
Chorus, Solo Voices, and
Orch. Simrock.
99. Fantasia on Baupach's 'Die
Tochter der Lult' in form
of a Concert-Overture for
Orch. (see op. 102).
00. *
.01. 6 German Songs (Book 6 of
Songs). B. & H.
.02. Filth Symphony (C min.).
Fantasia op. 99 used as first
movement. Haslinger.
03. G German Songs with acct. of
PF. and Clarinet (Book 7
of Songs). B. & H.
01. ' Vater miser ' (words by Klop-
stock). B. & H.
103. 6 Songs (Book S of Songs).
Berlin, Gallier.
10G. Quintet for stringed inivtr. (no.
5, G min.). Leipzig, Heinze.
107. 3 Duets for Soprano and Tenor
with PF. Simrock.
10S. S Duets for 2 Sopranos. Sim-
rock.
jnr>. *
110. Concertino forV.. 'Sonst und
Jetzt ' (no. 3, A min.). Mec
chetti.
11L Bondo alia Spagnuola (C) for
PF. and V. Mecchetti.
112. Duo Concertant for PF. and
V. (no. 3, E). Dresden, Paul.
113. Senate Concertante lor Harp
and V. (Eb). Schuberlh.
114. Do. (Eb). Schuberth.
115. Do. (Ab). Schuberth.
116. Historical Symphony (no. 6.
G). Dedicated to the Phil
harmonic Soc., London.
Mecchetti.
117. Fantasia for PF. and V. on
Airs Irom 'Der AlchymUt.'
Mecchetti.
118. Fantasia, for PF. (or Harp)
and V. on Airs of Handel
andAbtVogler. Schuberth.
119. Trio Concertaut (E min.) for
PF., V., and Cello. Schu
berth.
120. G 4-part Songs for mixed
Voices. Cassel, Appcl.
121. Double Symphony, 'Irdisches
undGottliches im Mensch-
enleben,' for Double Orch.
Schuberth.
122. Psahn 128. Chorus and Solo
Voices with Organ or PF.
Simrock.
123. Trio Concertant for PF.. V.,
and Cello (no. 2, F maj.).
Schuberth.
124. Trio Concertant for PF., V.,
and Cello (no. 3, A min.).
Schuberth.
125. Sonata (Ab) for PF. Dedicated
toMendelssohn. Mecchetti.
126. Concert-Overture, '1m ernsten
Styl'(D). Leipzig, Siegel.
127. ' Elegisch u. humoristisch,' 6
Duettinos for PF. and V.
Schuberth.
128. Concerto forV.(no.!5,E min.).
Schuberth.
129. Quintet for stringed instr.
(no 5, E min.). B. & H.
130. Quintet for PF., 2 V., Viola
and Cello. Schuberth.
131. Quartet Concert for 2 V.,
Viola, and Cello, with Orch.
B. & H.
132. String Quartet (no. 31, A).
B. *H.
133. Trio for PF., V.. and Cello
(no. 4, Bb). Schuberth.
134. Psalm 84 (Milton). Chorus
andSoloVoices with Orch.
135. Sechs Salonstiicke for V. and
PF. Schubenb.
136. Double Quartet (no 4, Bb).
Luckhardt.
137. Symphony (no. ?, G min.).
Dedicated to the Philhar
monic Soc. of Loud. Peters.
138. Sonatina for PF. and Voice!
' An Sie am Clavier.' Luck
hardt.
139. 5 Songs (Book 9). Luckhardt.
140. Sextet for 2 V., 2 Viola? and
2CelH(Cmaj.). Lucklmtlt.
141. Quartet (no. 32, C). Luck
hardt.
142. Trio for PF., V., and Cello
(no. 5, G min.). Schuberth.
143. Symphony 'The Season.'
(no. 9). Schuli'ith.
144. Quintet fur stringed instr.
(no. 7. G min.). Peters.
145. Sechs Salonstiicke fur V. and
PF. Peters.
146. String Quartet (no. S3, G).
Peters.
147. Septet for PF., Flute, Clari
net, Horn, Bassoon, V., and
Cello. Peters.
148. 3 Duets for 2 V. (no. 1, F)-
dedicated to the brothers
Holmes. (See ops. 150, 103.)
Peters.
140. BondulettoforPF.(G). Peters,
irx). 3 Duets for 2 V. (no. 2, D;.
(See ops. 148, 153.) Peters.
151. 6 4-part Sonas lur mi.\cJ
Voices. H. Pohle.
152. String Quartet (no. 31, Eb).
Siegel.
153. 3 Duets for 2 V, (no. 3, C).
Peters.
154. G Songs for a Enryton voice
with ace. of V. and PI'.
Luckhardt.
"WORKS •WITHOUT OFUS-XCMBER.
'Der Zweikampf mil der f.elieb-
ten.' Opera. Hamburg,
Boehme.
Overture and Bass Air from the
Cantata, 'Das belreiteDeutsch-
lanel.* Mecchetti.
'Zemire and Azor." Opera. Ham
burg, Cranz.
1 Die letzten Dinge '(The Last Judg
ment). Oratorio. Simrock.
'Vater XJnser' (words by 3!al>l-
man). Schlesinger.
Der Alchymist.' Opera. Schle-
singer.
Violinschule. Haslinger.
' Des Heilauds letzte Stiindcn '
(Calvary). Oratorio. Sclm-
berth.
Overture and Song for the play
' Der Matrose.' Schott.
'Der Fall Babylons.' Oratorio,
B. &H.
Die Kreuzfahrer* (The Cru
saders). Opera. Schnbrrtli.
30 Violin Studies by Fiorillo, wiili
a 2nd V. part added, finjrered
and bowed. Peters.
A number of Songs, written for
and published in various
Albums and Collections.
A considerable number of works
have remained iu manuscrii-t.
[P.D.]
SPONDEE (Lat. Spondceus). A metrical foot,
consisting of two long syllables ( — ), the first of
which is enforced by an accent.
The effect of the Spondee is well illustrated in
Handel's ' Waft her, Angels.'
n J* I I k.
Glo - rious there like you to rise.
It is also frequently employed in Instrumental
Movements, as in the Third Subject of the iioiulo
of Beethoven's ' Sonata pathetique.'
etc.
SPONDEE.
For instances of its employment in combina
tion with other feet, see METRE. [W.S.R.]
SPONTINI, GASPARO LUIGI PACIFJCO, born
Nov. 14, i774> at Majolati, near Jesi (the birth
place of Pergolesi), of simple peasants. Three
of his brothers took orders, and Gasparo was also
destined for the priesthood. An uncle on the
father's side took charge of the delicate child of
eight, and gave him elementary instruction. It
happened that a new organ was to be built for
this uncle's church, and the builder, who had
been sent for from Recanati, took up his abode
for the time at the parsonage. Here he brought
his harpsichord, and found an earnest listener in
Spontini, who would try to pick out for himself
what he had heard, whenever the organ-builder
was absent. The latter noticed the boy's talent,
and advised his uncle to have him educated as
a musician; but to this the priest would by
no means consent, resorting indeed to harsh
measures to drive the music out of him. The
result was that Spontini ran away to Monte san
"Vito,. where he had another uncle of a milder
disposition, who procured him music-lessons from
a certain Quintiliani. In the course of a year
the uncle at Jesi relented, took back his nephew,
and had him well grounded by the local musi
cians.
In 1791 his parents took him to Naples, where
he was admitted into the Conservatorio de' Tur-
chini.1 [See NAPLES.] His masters for coun
terpoint and composition were Sala and Tritto,
for singing, Tarantino.2 In the Neapolitan Con
servatories a certain number of the more ad
vanced pupils were set to teach the more back
ward ones. These 'monitors,' as we should say,
were called maestrini or maeslricelli.3 In 1795
Spontini became a candidate for the post of fourth
mae&tnno, but the examiners gave the preference
to another pupil. This seems to have roused the
lad to special industry, and in a short time lie
was appointed first maestrino. His exercise for
the competition of 1795 has been preserved, and
is now in the archives of the Real Collegio di
Musica at Naples. It must be the earliest of
his compositions now in existence.4
Spontini had already composed some cantatas
and church-rnusic performed in Naples and the
neighbourhood, and in 1796 had an oppor
tunity of attempting opera. The invitation came
from one of the directors of the Teatro Argentina
in Kome, who had been pleased with some of
Spontini's music which he had heard in Naples.
The professors seem to have refused him leave
to go, so he left the Conservatoire by stealth, and
reaching Rome quickly composed ' I puntigli
delle donne' with brilliant success. He was
readmitted into the Turchini at the intercession
of Piccinni, who had lived at Naples since his
1 So called because of the blue uniforms of the pupils. Turchino
=blue.
2 Florimo's ' Cenno storico sulla scuoH musicale di Napoli ' (Nap'es,
1869), vol. i. p. 50. On p. 673 Florimo speaks of Sailed and not Taran
tino as Spontini's master.
3 Lichtenthal, ' Dizionario e Bibliografia della Musica' (Milan 182G),
vol. ii. p. 20.
* Florimo, pp. 595, 609. and elsewhere.
SPONTIN1.
665
return in 1791, and gave Spontini valuable ad
vice with regard to composition, particularly for
his next opera, ' L'Eroismo ridicolo.' 5 This also
was produced in Rome (1797), as well as a third,
'II finto Pittore' (1798). Next followed three
operas for Florence, all in 1798. Meantime
Naples had begun to fix its attention on Spon
tini. 'L'Eroismo ridicolo' (one-act) was given
at the Teatro Nuovo during the Carnival of
1798, and reproduced in 2 acts as 'La finta
Filosofa ' at the same house in the summer of
1799. In the Carnival of 1800 the same theatre
brought out a new work by the industrious com
poser, 'La.fuga in maschera.'6 It is doubtful if
he was present at the performance ; for on Dec.
21, 1798, the Court, alarmed at the advance of
the French troops, took flight toPalermo, andCima-
rosa, who as maestro di capella should have gone
too, refusing to stir, Spontini was put into his
place, and during 1800 composed for the court
in Palermo no less than 3 operas, in the facile
and rapid style of a true disciple of the Neapo
litan school. This is specially worth noting, as
he afterwards completely changed in this respect,
and elaborated most slowly and carefully the
very works on which his European fame rests.
In Palermo he also began to teach singing, but
towards the end of 1800 was forced to leave, as
the climate was affecting his health. After sup
plying more operas for Rome and Venice, he
paid a visit to Jesi, and then took ship at Naples
for Marseilles. His aim was Paris, and there he
arrived in 1803.
From Lulli downwards all Italian composers
seem to have been impelled to try their fortunes
in the French capital. And, with the solitary
exception of Gluck, we may say that each fresh
development of French opera has originated with
an Italian. Invariably, however, these foreign
artists have had to encounter the onslaughts of
the national jealousy. The BoufFonists, Gluck,
Cherubini, all went through the same experience;
it was now Spontini's turn. The work by which
he introduced himself at the Theatre Italien (as
arranged in 1801), 'La finta Filosofa,' was, it is
true, well received ; but when he entered on the
special domain of the French opera-comique he
was roughly disillusioned. His first work of the
kind, 'Julie, ou le pot de fleurs' (March, 1804),
failed, and though remodelled by the composer
and revived in 1805, could not even then keep
the boards.7 The second, 'La petite Maison'
(June 23, 1804), was hissed ofF. This fate was
not wholly undeserved. Spontini had fancied
that the light, pleasing, volatile style, which
suited his own countrymen, would equally please
the Parisians. The composition of ' La petite
Maison ' (3 acts) occupied him only two months,
5 I can find no quite satisfactory ground for the statement so often
made in print that it was Cimarosa and not Picciuni who gave Spon
tini instruction in composition.
6 Ftitis speaks of yet another opera, ' L'Amore segreto ' (Naples,
1799), but there is no mention of it in Florimo's 4th volume.
7 At least so says Fetis, who was living in Taris from the middle of
1?04 to 1811, and who not only took great interest in Spontini's works
but was personally acquainted with him. Ledebur, in his 'Berliner
Tonkiinstler-Lexicon' (Berlin 1861), p. £01, gives a wholly opposite
account, but Fgtis seems the more credible witness.
666
6PONTINI.
and ' Julie ' considerably less. I only know the
latter, which was also produced (without success)
in Berlin, Dec. 5, 1808. Here and there some
isolated bit of melody recalls the composer of
the 'Vestale,' but that is all. Fe'tis remarks
that the forms of this opera are identical with
those of the earlier Neapolitans, Guglielmi,
Cimarosa, and Paisiello. This is true; but it
must be added that Spontini by no means at
tains to the sprightliness and charm of his prede
cessors. The melodies, though very attractive,
are often trivial. Stronger work than this was
needed to beat the French composers, with
Mehul at their head, and Boieldieu, who had
already written the ' Calife de Bagdad,' in their
ranks. Spontini, however, was not discouraged.
During this period Fetis met him occasionally at
a pianoforte-maker's, and was struck with his in
vincible confidence in himself. He was making
a livelihood by giving singing-lessons.
Seeing that he had no chance of making an
impression with his present style he broke away
from it entirely, and tried a new ideal. His
very next opera, 'Milton' (Nov. 27, 1804), a
little work in one act, is of an entirely different
character, the melodies more expressive, the har
mony and orchestration richer, the whole more
carefully worked out, and the sentiment alto
gether move earnest. But the most interesting
point in the score is the evidence it affords of
Mozart's influence. One is driven to the con
clusion that Spontini had now for the first time
made a solid acquaintance with the works of the
German masters. As Cherubini saw in Haydn,
so Spontini henceforth saw in Mozart (and shortly
afterwards in another German composer) a pat
tern of unattainable excellence. Even in old
age he used to speak of Don Juan as ' that im
mortal chef-d'oeuvre,' and it was one of the very
few works besides his own which he conducted
when director-general at Berlin. No. 3 in ' Mil
ton' (C major, 3-8) is in many passages so like
'Vedrai, carino' as to be obviously due to
Mozart's direct influence. Milton's fine hymn
to the Sun (no. 4) has something of the mild
solemnity which Mozart contrived to impart to
the ' Zauberflb'te,' and also to his compositions for
the Freemasons. The most remarkable number
is the quintet (no. 7). Here warmth and nobility
of melody, impressive declamation, rich accom
paniment, and charm of colour are all united.
Such a piece as this is indeed scarcely to be
found in his later works. With the Neapolitan
school it has nothing in common, but is for the
most part drawn from the Mozartean fount of
beauty, with traces of that grandeur and nobility
so emphatically his own. The change of style
which separates his later works from his earlier
ones is, at any rate in this quintet, already com
plete. In other pieces of the opera the Neapo
litan is still discernible, as for instance in the
crescendo, which became so celebrated in Ros
sini's works, though known to others besides
Spontini before Rossini's day.
'Milton' took at once with the French, and
made its way into Germany, being .produced in
SPONTINI.
Berlin (translation by Treitschke) March 24,
iSoG,1 Weimar, Dresden, and Vienna.
The writer of the libretto, Etienne Jouy,
played a considerable part in Spontini's life. He
was present at the performance of ' La petite
Maison,' but its complete fiasco (the work of a
jealous clique) had no effect upon him. He saw
in Spontini a man of great dramatic talent, and
found in the despised work a host of beauties
of the first rank. Meeting the composer the
following morning, he offered him a libretto of
his own, which Spontini, in no way disheartened
by his failure, immediately accepted. This li
bretto was not 'Milton,' but 'La Vestale.'2 It
was originally intended for Cherubini, but he
could not make up his mind to compose it, and
after a long delay returned it.3 To Spontini it
afforded the means of ranking himself at once
with the first operatic composers of the day.
How 'Milton' and the 'Vestale' stand to each
other in matter of date it is impossible to ascer
tain. That the latter was composed before
'Milton' was put on the stage is not probable,
since in that case the two must have been written
within less than six months. What probably
happened was this — an opportunity offered to
wards the close of 1804 °f producing a small
opera at the Theatre Feydeau, and Spontini
then broke off the longer work upon which he
was already engaged to avail himself of this new
chance. He may not have been sorry too to
make a preliminary trial of his new style upon
the public. On the other hand, we know for cer
tain that the score of the ' Vestale ' was finished
in 1805. Jouy says that it took three years to
overcome the opposition to its production, and
the first performance took place Dec. 15, 1807.
He was now fortunately in favour with the
Empress Josephine — to whom he dedicated the
score of ' Milton' — and was appointed her cham
ber-composer — 'Compositeur particulier/ etc. A
cantata, ' L'Eccelsa Gara,' performed Feb._ 8,
1806, at the fetes given in honour of Austerlitz,
helped to increase this goodwill, which proved
of vital importance to Spontini in maintaining
his ground against the opposition of the Conser
vatoire. To such a length was this opposition
carried that at one of the Concerts Spirituels in
Holy Week, 1807, an oratorio of his was yelled
off the stage by the students. Meantime, how
ever, through the Empress's patronage, 'La
Vestale' was in rehearsal at the Opera. But
so prejudiced were the artists against the work
that the rehearsals went on amid ridicule and
opposition, both inside and outside the theatre.
Some foundation for this no doubt did exist.
1 'Teichmann's Literary Remains, edited by Dingelstedt' (Stutt
gart, Cotta, 18G3), p. 415. , .
2 See Jouy's own account, ' Notes anecdotiques sur 1 op^ra di
Vestale,' in the ' Theatre d'Etieune Jouy ' (1'aris 1821), vol. n. p. 1«.
^So'says Mils. Others have stated that besides Cherubini it had
been offered to M<5hul, Boieldieu, Paer, and others, and that the tne
unknown Spontini was a last resource. That the latter part (
statement is positively untrue we know from Jouy himsel na in-
rest will not bear examination. The mistakes as to tl
Spontini's Hie are very numerous. Jouy even did not know ti
rect date of his birth, for he speaks of him in 18W as ' fc pem
vingt-cinq ans.' For a long time he was universally suppos
been born iu 1778.
SPONTINI.
Even in the ' Finta Filosofa ' the orchestra was
said to have drowned the voices.1 Whether this
was justified — even from an Italian point of
view — I cannot say, not knowing the work, but
there is some ground for it in the 'Vestale,'
which also fell short in many other points.'-'
Fe"tis attended the rehearsals, and is an un
impeachable witness on this point. Spontini's
thoughts were throughout fresh and significant,
but, not having before attempted lyric tragedy,
he did not in all cases succeed in giving them
a satisfactory form. Then began an intermin
able altering and remodelling on his part ; the
most trying experiences at rehearsals did not
discourage him from again and again re-casting
passage after passage, until he had hit on the
best possible form. This indefatigable polishing
and experimenting became henceforth one of his
characteristics, and instead of diminishing, as
he acquired command of his means, as might
have been expected, each new work seemed to
strengthen the habit. People are still living in
Berlin wlio have seen him at work in this way.
He would alter a passage four and five times,
each time pasting-on the new version, so that at
last the score became quite bulky, and not un-
frequently, after all this experimenting, he would
revert to the original form.
The rehearsals were at length brought to a
o o
close after endless trouble, when, at the last
moment, the performance was all but postponed,
by a command from the Emperor that Lesueur's
'La Mort d'Adam,' which had long been ac
cepted, should be given before it. When how
ever the copyist was about to set to work, by
some accident Lesueur's score could not be
found, and thus Spontini secured precedence for
the 'Vestale.' Its success was the most brilliant
imaginable, and it long remained a favourite
with the Parisians, having been performed 200
times as early as the year 1824. The caste on
the first night was as follows : Licinius, Nourrit;
China, Lais; the High-Priest, De'rivis; the Chief-
Augur, Bonel ; A Consul, Martin ; Julia, Mme.
Branchu ; the Chief Vestal, Mme. Armand.
Both composer and poet received permission to
dedicate the work to the Empress. A higher
distinction than this however awaited Spontini.
Napoleon had founded a prize to be given every
ten years to the new opera which should have
made the greatest success within that period.
The time of the award drew near, Mehul, Gossec,
and Gre'try were the judges, and their bestowal
of the prize on the ' Vestale/ instead of on Les
ueur's 'Bardes' was a tacit acknowledgement
that the organised opposition to the foreigner
was at an end. The opera soon became known
beyond France. The first performance at San
Carlo in Naples (to an Italian translation by
1 ' Allg. Musik. Zeitung' for 1801, p. 382.
2 The ' Vestale ' was a marvel of noise for its day, and a good story
was current about it in Paris at the time. A well-known physician
had advised a friend to go and hear it as a remedy for his deafness,
and accompanied him to the theatre. After one of the loudest
bursts, 'Doctor,' cried the friend in ecstacy. 'Doctor, I can hear!'
but alas, the doctor made no response, the same noise which had
cured his friend had deafened him.
SPONTINI.
667
Giovanni Schmidt) took place Sept. 8, iSn,3
with Isabella Colbran as Julia. It made a
great sensation, and Spontini might perhaps
have found a worthy successor among his own
countrymen in Nicola Antonio Manfroce, had
this talented young man not been carried off by
an early death. On the title-page of the ' Ves
tale ' Spontini styles himself Chamber-composer
to the Empress, and Maestro di capella to the
Conservatorio of Naples. Whether this title was
a new honour, or whether he brought it with
him to Paris I know not. Vigano adapted the
'Vestale' as a ballet, and in this form also it
was universally popular in Italy. — In Berlin the
first performance took place Jan. 18, I Sir, to a
translation by Herklots. It was given at Mu
nich on Jan. 14, and Wurzburg Jan. 10, 1812.
Jouy drew the material of his poem, the
action of which takes place in the year of Eome
269, from Winckelmann's 'Monument! antichi
inediti.' It still ranks as one of the best li
brettos of the present century, and justly so.
As for the music it is so entirely new, and so
utterly unlike the Neapolitan style, that it is
not to be wondered at if the malicious story
that Spontini was not the composer of it, has
occasionally been believed. Not that this could
have happened if 'Milton' had been better
known, for in that little opera the metamorphosis
of his style is already complete. His new style
Spontini did not evolve entirely from his own
resources. Of the influence of Mozart we have
already spoken, but that of Gluck, with whose
works he became acquainted in Paris, was more
important still. * Iphigdnie in Aulis ' is said to
have been the opera the first hearing of which
showed him his future path. Not that Gluck
was in his eyes a greater master than Mozart.
Some years later, at a banquet given in Spon-
tini's honour at Berlin, some one said in his
praise that as a composer he had fulfilled all
the requirements of a master of the musico-
dramatic art, when he exclaimed hastily, 'No,
it is only Mozart who has done that.' 4 But
still it is obvious that Gluck was nearer of kin
to him than Mozart. With Gluck he shares
that touch of grandeur, the refined melancholy
of which is often so peculiarly attractive, though
as a rule the depth of Gluck's sentiment is
beyond the reach of the Italian master. As
with Gluck too the dramatic gift preponderates
in Spontini over the purely musical. He is in
this respect remarkable among Italian composers,
who though all endowed with a certain instinct
for stage-effect, yet prefer to set their operas to
concert-music. The moment that personal vin-
dictiveness against Spontini ceased it could not
but be acknowledged that ' La Vestale ' was full
of beauties, and that it seized the audience
by its grand melodies and fiery outbursts, its
depth of passion and truth of expression, its
genuinely tragic style, and the singularly happy
3 See Florlmo, 'Scuola Musicale di Napoli,' iv. 268. In his earlier
work, ' Cenno storico sulla Scuola musicale di Napoli ' (Naples, 1869)
p. G31, he says the first performance took place in 1^09.
•i II. Doru's ' Aus ineiaem Leben,' pt. 3. p. 9; Berlin, Behr, 1870.
668
SPONTINI.
SPONTINI.
way in which the scenes and characters were
individualised. On the other hand there were
great shortcomings which could not be ignored.
These chiefly lay — outside a certain monotony in
the movements — in the harmony. When Berlioz
afterwards ventured to maintain that scarcely
two real faults in harmony could be pointed out
in the score, he only showed how undeveloped
was his own sense of logical harmony. It is in
what is called unerring instinct for th
harmony that Spontini so sensibly falls short in
' La Vestale.'
This no doubt arose from the fact that his early
training in Naples was insufficient to develop
the faculty, and that when he had discovered
the direction in which his real strength lay it
was too late to remedy the want. Zelter, who in
reference to Spontini never conceals his narrow-
mindedness, made a just remark when he said
that the composer of the Vestale would never
rise io anything much higher than he was then,
if he were over 25 at the time that it was written. L
He never really mastered a great part of the
material necessary for the principal effects in his
grand operas. His slow and laborious manner of
writing, too, which he retained to the last, though
creditable to his conscientiousness as an artist,
is undoubtedly to be attributed in part to a
sense of uncertainty.
Between the ' Vestale,' which we take to have
been finished in 1805, and Spontini's next opera
four years elapsed. To this period apparently
belongs a collection of 6 songs, with accom
paniment for PF. or harp, entitled ' Sensations
douces, melancoliques et douloureuses, exprime'es
en vers par M. de G. — L., et en musique avec
accompagnement de Piano ou Harpe par Gaspare
Spontini Maitre de Chapelle du Conservatoire
de Naples. Dedie'es au souvenir [de] Delie. Pro-
prie'te" des Auteurs. A Paris. Se vend chez
1'Auteur de la musique. Rue du Faubourg Pois-
sonniere, no. 6.' Some special series of events
seems to have given rise to these pieces, but
whether affecting the poet or the composer is not
discoverable. The first two are called ' Sentimens
cV amour,' the 3rd and 4th ' Regrets d'Absence,'
and the last two ' Plaintes sur la tombe.' As
might be expected they are all very theatrical,
and exhibit many awkwardnesses in the harmony.
No. 4 is the best, and its opening phrase deserves
quoting ns a specimen of refined melancholy :
Moderate. .-^
zrprpEzr. ^oiffz^g
sons
tou - chants.
His next opera was 'Fernand Cortez,' the first
performance of which took place Nov. 28, 1809,
i ' Brieftvechsel zwischen Goethe und Zelter,' vol. i. p. 438.
with Lavigne and Mine. Branchu in the prin
cipal parts. The libretto was again by Jouy
and not by 2Esme'nard, who merely made some
alterations and additions. Napoleon took an in
terest in the production of ' Cortez,' from an idea
that it might influence public opinion in favour
of his plans for the Spanish war, then in progress.
As soon as the preparations began Jouy was
warned by the Minister of the Interior to intro
duce into the piece more distinct allusions to the
topics of the day. He was specially to strengthen
the contrast between the humane views of Cortez
and the fanaticism of the Mexicans, and thus
suggest a comparison between the liberal-minded
French and the bigotted Spaniards of the day.
Jouy declining to make these alterations, the
Minister proposed Esme'nnrd for the work. Na
poleon was present at the first performance,3
but the result did not fully answer his expecta
tions. Spontini had thrown so much life into
the character of the Spaniards, and had made
them so bold, patriotic, and fearless of death,
that the sympathies of the audience were enlisted
in behalf of Spaniards in general, and ATapoleon
ran the risk of witnessing an exactly opposite
effect to that which he intended. The success
of the opera was very great, equalling if not
exceeding that of the ' Vestale.' On the whole
we should not be wrong in pronouncing 'Cortez'
the more finished work of the two. The faults of
harmony are fewer, the tendency (latterly so ex
aggerated) to pile up means in order to produce
imposing effects is still kept within due bounds.
Remark.-ible skill is shown in the treatment of the
masses, and the construction of the larger dramatic
forms. The martial tone demanded by the subject
is well maintained throughout, the savage pas
sions are delineated with an energy often startling,
while some pieces are distinguished by grace and
dignity. Throughout we are brought in contact
with an individual artist, who has created for
himself his own means of expression.4 The
certainty of touch too in the different characters,
especially Cortez, Amazily, and Telasco, is
worthy of all praise. The way especially in
which the opposite nature of the Spaniards and
Mexicans is brought out shows consummate
creative power. Here Spontini is seen to be a
worthy successor of Gluck, who was the first
to attempt this kind of problem in his ' Paris et
Helene.' Gluck had many able successors, such
as Winter in Germany and Me'hul in France,
but Spontini comes still nearer to the great model,
and has in his turn served as an example for
others. Neither Rossini's ' Guillaume Tell' nor
Marschner's ' Templer und Jiidin ' would have
been quite what they are but for him.
The form in which we know 'Cortez' is not
that in which it first appeared. After a long
interval it was revived May 26, 1817, in an
2 Riehl('Musikalische Charakterko'pfe," 5th ed., Stuttgart, Cotla.
1K76, vol. i. p. 192; ; following Kaoul Kochette, 'Notice historique sur
la vie et les ouvrages de M. Spontini' (Paris, Firmin Didot, 1M2;.
s Theatre d'Etienne Jouy,' vol. ii. p. 199, et seq.
4 In face of this self-evident fact but little importance will be at-
ached to the discovery made in Paris that the Trio ' Createur de ce
nouveau monde,' \vas an imitation of an ' 0 .salutaris Iiostia <
ossec's. See 'Journal dts iK'bats ' lor June 1, 1817.
SPONTINI.
entirely new shape. Esmdnard was dead, and
for the alterations in the poem Jouy was entirely
responsible. The 3rd act now became the 1st, the
ist act the 2nd, and a part of the 2nd the 3rd ;
some passages were suppressed and others added,
and the part of Montezuma was entirely new.
Jouy had introduced Montezuma into his ori
ginal sketch, but thinking the part weak and
undramatic had omitted it in the first libretto.
It now reappeared. The part of Amazily is
simplified as regards her appearances, but the
character is strengthened. In the earlier play
love has stifled her patriotism, now she is divided
between her lover and her country, producing a
conflict of emotions truly dramatic. By putting
the execution of the Spanish prisoners at the
opening of the opera, and thus showing the
Mexican people in all their savage barbarity,
the poet hoped to dispose the audience more
decidedly in favour of the victorious Spaniards,
and to make the conquest of Mexico a clear
necessity. But his success in this was not com
plete ; the sympathies of the audience still wavered
between the heroism of the conquerors and the
misfortunes of the conquered. The reception of
the music was as favourable as ever, but on the
libretto opinions were divided. The delay in the
appearance of Cortez till the 2nd act, was felt to
lessen the interest in Amazily's love, Alvar's
danger, and all that concerns the Spaniards. This
is undeniably true, but on the other hand the 2nd
act gains so immeasurably in strength that the
loss is more than counterbalanced. More serious
objections might be urged against the 3rd act,
which after the exciting events of the first two
inevitably falls flat; and this Spontini proposed to
remedy by a third revision. In November 1823,
the poet Theauleon came to Berlin to write the
libretto of ' Alcidor,' and Spontini commissioned
him to remodel the 3rd act, which he did as
follows : Amazily falls into the power of the
Mexican priests, who, in defiance of Monte
zuma, prepare to sacrifice her, but at the last
moment Cortez appears with his Spaniards, and
saves his love. This exciting scene, with most
effective music, brings up the interest of the last
act to the level of the others. The pianoforte
score, arranged by F. Naue, and published by
Hofmeister of Leipzig, gives the opera as it
stood after this third and final revision. The
full score came out in Paris in the fortieth year
after Spontini's retirement from Berlin. The
3rd act in its second form may be found in
Jouy's '(Euvres completes,' vol. ii. p. iSj-.
In 1 8 10 Spontini became conductor of the
Italian opera, which was united with the
Comedie Fran9aise under the title of 'Theatre
de I'linpe'ratrice,' and located at the Odeon. He
formed a distinguished company of singers, im
proved the orchestra, and threw more variety
into the repertoire. One signal service was his
production for the first time in Paris of 'Don
Juan' in its original form. He remodelled Catel's
' Semiramide,' with fresh numbers of his own,
and revived it with some success.1 He also in-
J Ft-tis.
SPONTINI.
6C9
stituted Concerts Spirituels, at which he success
fully introduced such works as Mozart's Re-
quiem, Haydn's Symphonies, and extracts from
the ' Creation.' But he did not keep the con-
ductorship long. Differences arose between him
self and Alexandre Duval, the director of the
theatre, and in 1812 Spontini was dismissed
from his post by M. de Remusat, surintendant
of the Imperial theatres.
On the restoration of the Bourbons in 1814
Spontini was reinstated, but soon gave up the
post to Catalan: for a money consideration. His
conduct as conductor of the opera does not give
a favourable idea of his character. When Count
Briihl was in Paris, Spontini was described to
him by the managers of the Ope'ra as 'grasping
nnd indolent ; ill-natured, treacherous, and spite
ful.'2 Catalani too always averred that he had
treated her badly. Some, however, took a more
favourable view, and maintained that he had
been both zealous and successful in his efforts
for the furtherance of art. Fetis believed "that
it was not Sponfcini but Duval who should have
been dismissed in 1812. It is curious thus to
find the same difference of opinion in Paris with
regard to Spontini's character which was after
wards so noticeable in Berlin.
On the 3oth May 1814, Louis XVIII became
king of France, and in commemoration of the
event Jouy and Spontini wrote a festival-opera
in 2 acts called ' Pelage, ou le Roi de la Paix.'
The first performance took place Aug. 23, 1814.
The work is of no value, and must have been
very quickly composed. The subject is idyllic,
breathing only soft emotions, and therefore en
tirely contrary to the nature of Spontini's talent.
The opera was dedicated to the king, who ap
pointed Spontini his 'Dramatic composer in or
dinary.' It is often said that Spontini's music
displays the spirit of the age of Napoleon. The
remark is true so far as the martial splendour,
the vehement energy, the overpowering massive
effect of his grand Qperas are concerned. In all
this the spirit of the time is recognisable enough.
But it resides in the music only ; and it would
be very wrong to conclude that Spontini him
self was an adherent of Napoleon's politics or
person. He was as little of an imperialist as
Weber (notwithstanding his songs in the cause
of liberty) was a democrat. Art and Politics
are two distinct things, and if Spontini did do
homage to Louis after enjoying the favour of
Napoleon there is no need to blame him.
He next took part with Persuis, Berton, and
Kreutzer in an op^ra-ballet, ' Les Dieux rivaux,'
produced June 21, 1816, in honour of the marriage
of the Due de Berri. Spontini's share was confined
to two or three dances, and a song, ' Voici le Roi,
Fran£ais fideles,' of little value. Other ballet-
music however, composed for Salieri's ' Danaides,'
rises to the level of 'Cortez' and the ' Vestale.'
The opera, revived with this addition Oct. 22,
1817, was enthusiastically received.
But these pieces d'occaxion .sink into insignifi
cance before the grand opera 'Olympia,' 'imitated*
2 Letter of Bruhl to Frederic William 111, Oct. 8, 1319.
G70
SPONTINI.
by Briffaut and Dieulafoy from Voltaire's tragedy.
Spontini took a most unusual length of time for
the composition. He was at work upon the last
act in December 1815, and yet the opera was
not finished by January iSig.1 After so much
trouble and pains he not unnaturally considered
it his best work. ' This score,' he writes Nov.
27, 1819, 'must be ranked higher, for importance
and range of subject, than those of La Vestale and
Cortez'; and to this opinion he adhered, in spite
of many proofs that the public judged otherwise.
At the first performance (Paris, Dec. 15, 1819),
a bitter disappointment awaited him, for the
opera failed in spite of his numerous supporters,
and of the generally favourable disposition of the
Parisians towards him. Spontini however was
not the man to throw up his cause for a first
failure. The libretto was chiefly to blame. The
writers had adhered too closely to Voltaire,
without remembering the requirements of the
music, or the established forms of Grand Opera.
The tragical conclusion especially was objected
to as an innovation. This was remedied first
of all, and a happy ending substituted. By
February, 1820, Spontini was at work on the
revision, which he completed in less than a
year, and the opera was produced in its new
form, May 14, 1821, at Berlin. In 1822 it
\\.is again revised, the changes this time being
in the airs for Olympic and Cassandre, the duet
for the same in the first act, and a new scene
with terzetto in the third. As this last is not
included in the printed edition it looks as if the
final form of the opera had not even yet been at
tained. Schlesinger of Berlin published a complete
pianoforte-score in i826.2 The opera was again
put on the stage in Paris Feb. 28, 1826, and by
March 15 it had already been played 6 times.3
Each time it pleased more, and at last Spontini
was able to count it among his great triumphs.
It was however only in Berlin, where he settled
in 1820, that it kept a permanent place in the
repertoire. It had a short ^un at Dresden and
Darmstadt in 1822, and w.ns proposed at Vienna,
but the performance did not take place. The
opera has now completely disappeared from
musical life, a fate it shares with Cherubini's
' Mede'e.' That no attempts have been made
to revive it must be attributed partly to the
enormous demands which it makes on the
dramatic and scenic resources of a theatre, and
also to the fact that Spontini's operas are of an
individual type and require a peculiar style of
representation. The few living musicians who
remember the performances of Spontini's operas
in Berlin between 1820 and 1830 know the kind
of interpretation he used to give of them —
one which by no means lay on the surface.
Dorn, in his ' Kecollections/* says that at Leipzig
in 1829 the final chorus in the 2nd act of the
'Vestale' was ridiculed as a mere waltz-tune.
When Dorn undertook the direction of the
1 Letters from Spontini to Count Eriihl, dated Dec. 22, 1815, and
Jan. 14. 1819.
2 A full score, in 3 vols, was published by Erard at Paris.
3 Marx's ' Berliner Allgem. 3ms. Zeitung ' 1or 1826, p. 314.
< 'Aus meinem Leben-Erinnerungen ' (Berlin 1870), p. la] et seg.
SPONTINI.
opera, and had to conduct the 'Vestale,' he
made such good use of his recollections of the
way in which it was conducted by the composer,
that the chorus in question was scarcely re
cognised, and all adverse comments were silenced.
'Another fifty years,' continues he, 'and the
Spontini traditions will have disappeared, as the
Mozart traditions have already done.' It would
be more correct to say that both have disap
peared. The Spontini traditions might possibly
have lived longer had his work in Germany been
more successful than it was. But there is enough
to account for this, and more, in the unsettled
condition of all stage matters in Germany for
many years past.
'Olympic' and 'A.gnes von Hohenstaufen'—
written ten years later — stand alone among
operas of the I9th century for grandeur of con
ception. True, in isolated scenes of the ' Hugue
nots ' and the ''Prophete,' Meyerbeer approached
his predecessor, but he never succeeded in creating
a whole of such magnificent proportions. The
unity of design is remarkable, each act seems
to be cast in one mould ; and this from the
fact that musically the several scenes of each
act run into each other in a much more marked
manner than in 'Cortez' or the 'Vestale.' There
is also, throughout, the closest connection between
the music, the scenes on the stage, and the
development of the plot — the cachet of the true
dramatic artist. The principal characters are
well defined, and the tone assigned to each at
the start is skilfully maintained. The first en
trances, always the most important moment in
opera for fixing the character of a part, are
always very significant. For instance, it is inter
esting to observe the entirely different nature of
the music at the entrances of Olympia and of
Statira. The latter, the principal character in
the piece, has no rival, unless it be Cherubini's
' Mede'e,' or perhaps Gluck's 'Armide.' A
sorrowful woman, burdened with horrible me
mories and burning for revenge, she is yet a
Queen from the crown of her head to the sole of
her foot, and a heroine, as all must acknowledge,
worthy of Alexander the Great. Bearing in
mind the grandeur of the subject, and its back
ground of history, the composer's choice of mate
rial does not seem exaggerated.
But these great qualities are accompanied by
considerable defects. Apart from the falsified
history of the plot, which might easily disturb
a cultivated spectator in these days of accuracy,
the happy conclusion weakens the interest in
the fate of the chief characters. The part of
Statira, at any rate, was far more consistent
and homogeneous when the ending was tragic.
The music, undeniably grandly sketched ^as a
whole, lacks charm in the details. Spontini was
not an instrumental composer. His overtures,
dances, and marches, are in all cases music
without any independent existence, simply in
tended to introduce or accompany. Instru
mental music, from its immense plasticity and
variety, is the best possible school for develop
ing all the rich resources of the musical art ; but
SPONTINI.
in this school Spontini had never been properly
disciplined, and the neglect makes itself felt in
his larger dramatic forms. These are monotonous
and wearisome, while his basses are poor, and his
accompaniments wanting in variety. It seems
strange that with his great reverence for Mozart—
the great model in this respect also — he should
never have been aware of this want in himself.
His melodies lack plasticity, that bold free move
ment which is absolutely essential if the melody
is to remain dominant over all the accumulated
masses of sound. He has not sufficient command
of language to have always ready to his hand
suitable means of expression for the rapid changes
of sentiment in the course of a scene. Nor has
he the power of assigning the instrumental music
its due share in the dramatic development. If
all the work is done by the singing and acting,
one is tempted to ask what is the object of all
this overwhelming apparatus in the orchestra ?
The important part played by the instrumental
music in an opera, that of preparing and elucid
ating the sentiments, making them subjectively
more credible, and objectively clearer, this pro
blem Spontini either did not grasp, or felt himse] f
unable to solve. In all these respects he was
far surpassed by Cherubim and Weber, each in
his own line.
Whilst Spontini was busy in Paris composing
' Olympic,' the way was being prepared for the
most important event in the second half of his
life — his summons to Berlin. As no authentic
account of the circumstances of his going there,
or of his twenty-two years' sojourn and work in
the Prussian capital, has yet been published, we
must treat the subject somewhat in detail,
from MS. authorities hitherto unused.1 King
Frederic William III, during a visit of two
months to Paris (March 31 to the beginning of
June 1814), heard Spontini's operas several times,
and was deeply impressed by them. Not only
was ' Cortez ' at once put in rehearsal at Berlin
and produced Oct. 15, 1814, but the king, on the
return of peace, occupied himself with various
plans for improving the state of music in Prussia.
An establishment for the promotion of church
music was thought of; a Conservatoire for music
and declamation was projected, like that at Paris,
and, above all, fresh impulse was to be given to
the Court Opera by engaging a conductor of ac
knowledged ability. For this last post Spontini
was the man fixed upon. So far back as the
autumn of 1814 proposals had been made to him
at Vienna, offering him the then immense salary
of 5000 thalers (.£750) on condition of his furnish
ing two operas a year for Berlin. Spontini was
inclined to accept, but the plan did not meet with
the approval of the Intendant of the Royal theatre
—Count Bruhl, who had succeeded Iffland in Feb.
1815. Briihl's opinion was entitled to the more
weight as there had scarcely ever been a theatrical
manager in Germany who knew his business so
well. He was himself an actor of great experience,
1 The principal sources upon which we have drawn are papers
belonging to the royal theatres of Berlin, and to the Prussian lioyal
Family.
SPONTINI.
671
had studied several parts at Weirnar under Goethe's
direction, had sung Sacchini's (Edipus in French,
and taken other parts in grand operas at Rheins-
berg, Prince Henry's palace. He had even played
the horn for months together in the band. He
was no inefficient scene-painter ; had studied
drawing with Genelli, and archaeology with Hirt
and Botticher, had devoted some time to architec
ture, and was personally acquainted with nearly
all the important theatres in Germany, Paris, and
London. Add to this his refined taste, ideal turn
of mind, and high social position, and it will be
seen that he possessed qualities rarely found
united in the person of a theatrical manager. It
is not to be supposed that Brlihl ignored the
advantage of having so distinguished an artist at
the head of the Berlin opera. It was however
by no means certain that Spontini had had the
necessary practice as a conductor, for at Paris no
composer conducts his own operas. His ignorance
of German would not only make it difficult for
him and his musicians to understand each other,
but would also prevent his composing a German
opera. As yet he had only composed two operas
of acknowledged merit, and it was possible that
he would not be able to supply two new ones each
year ; and if he were able, the price paid for them
would be exorbitant, unless it were quite certain
that as interpreted under his own direction they
would mark a decided step in advance. At this
point therefore the negotiations hung fire, until
the king returned to Paris in July 1815, when
he renewed his offer to Spontini in person, and
accepted the dedication of a piece of military
music. At his request Spontini sent a collection
of his marches to Briihl, following it on Dec. 22,
1815, with a letter, in which he begged him to
exert his influence in arranging the matter. This
not availing, he got a personal appeal made to
him from the Prussian embassy. On March 28,
1816, Briihl returned an evasive answer, and on
Nov. 3 wrote decisively that the king had settled
the affair adversely to Spontini's wishes, and that
he must abandon with regret the pleasure of
seeing him settled in Berlin.
The matter now appeared wholly at an end ;
the king having yielded to the representations of
his Intendant. Spontini had at that time no
settled appointment in Paris, beyond that of
court-composer, and it is easy to understand how
tempting so brilliant an offer from Berlin must
have seemed. He now entered into a fresh con
nection with Naples, and received in the follow
ing year the title of maestro di capella to the King
of the Two Sicilies. The French king also gave
him a salary of 2000 francs, and thus all thoughts
of Berlin seemed for the time to have vanished.
In 1817 King Frederic William came to Paris
for the third time, heard ' Cortez ' in its new form,
was so delighted that he attended four repre
sentations, and directed that the score should be
secured at once for Berlin. Spontini received
the title of Premier maitre cfe chapelle honoraire,
and was permitted to dedicate to the king his
grand ' Bacchanale,' composed for the ' Danaides.'
This he was shrewd enough to arrange for ta
672
SPONTINI.
Prussian military band, introducing an air from
the ' Vestale,' ' La paix est en ce jour la fruit de
vos conquetes.' To confirm himself in the king's
favour he even composed a Prussian national
anthem. This national hymn, composed by a
bora Italian and naturalised Frenchman, was
completed between Nov. 25, 1817, and Oct. 18,
1818. The words, written by the king's private
secretary J. F. L. Duncker, begin
Wo 1st das Volk das klihn von That
Der Tyrannei den Kopf zertrat.1
On the latter date (the anniversary of the battle
of Leipzig), Briihl had the work performed for
the first time at the Berlin opera-house, and from
1820 to 1840 it was played every year on the
king's birthday, August 3. A Volkslied, from in
herent reasons, it never could become ; but it has
a certain chivalresque stateliness and distinction
of its own.2 After the death of Frederic William
III. it gradually disappeared from the musical life
of Berlin.3 The king, however, decreed in March
1818 that the 'Vestale' .should be performed every
year on April i, in remembrance of the first time
he passed in Paris in 1814.
This year also ended without realising the
king's project of attaching Spontini to his court.
Spontini, aware that Briihl was opposed to his
coming, contrived to carry on the negotiations
through Major-General von Witzleben, an ardent
admirer of his music, and the person who had
suggested his composing the Prussian national
anthem. The contract was at length drawn up in
August 1819, and signed by the king on Septem
ber I. It provided that Spontini should receive
the titles of chief Capellmeister, and General
Director of Music, with an additional one of
' Superintendant-General of the Royal Music' to
be borne abroad. He was to take the general
superintendence of all musical affairs, and to com
pose two new grand operas, or three smaller ones,
every three years. He was bound to conduct only
at the first performances of his own works ; at
other times he might conduct or not as he pleased.
In addition he was to compose pieces $ occasion
for the court-festivals, and whenever the king
pleased. Any other works he chose to compose
and produce at the theatre were to be paid for
separately. He was also at liberty, with slight
restrictions, to produce his operas for his own
benefit elsewhere, and to sell them to publishers.
His salary was fixed at 4000 thalers, payable
half-yearly in advance, besides an annual benefit,
guaranteed to yield to at least 1050 thalers, and
a benefit concert, with the theatre free, and the
gratuitous assistance of the members of the Royal
opera and orchestra. He was to have four
months leave of absence every year, and an ade
quate pension after ten years' service. The Prus
sian ambassador interfered to procure his release
from his engagement at Naples, and the king
undertook to pay any necessary damages.
Although nominally subordinate to Briihl,
1 Shew me the land which bold and free,
Has crushed the head of tyranny !
2 Published by Schlesinger of Berlin.
3 In I.M.~> it was sung to fresh words at a gala-performance at the
Scala of Milan in honour of the present Emperur.
SPONTINI.
Spontini was by this contract virtually made
his colleague. Briihl's experienced eye, however,
soon detected certain passages in the document
admitting of two interpretations, and exposing
the Management to all the dangers of a divided
authority. He could not help feeling mortified
at 1>he way he had been superseded in the busi
ness; this would naturally make him mistrust
Spontini, and thus the two came together under
unfavourable auspices. According to the con
tract Spontini should have begun work at Berlin
on Feb. 15, 1820, but he obtained leave to post
pone his coming, first to March 15, and then to
May 15, and did not arrive until May 28, 1820.
The corps dramatique, piqued at the exorbitant
terms of his engagement, did not meet him in the
friendliest spirit, but Berlin society was favour
ably disposed towards him, particularly the court
circle. The newspapers were full of the subject,
and thus it came to pass that all classes were
keenly interested.
The Opera was at this time, thanks to Briihl's
exertions, in a high state of efficiency. The
company was unusually good — including such
singers as Mesdames Milder-Hauptmann,Seidler-
Wranitzky, Schulz-Killitschky, and Eunicke;
Messrs. Bader, Stumer, Blume, and Ednard
Devrient. The band had been well trained by
Bernhard Weber. Briihl took immense pains to
secure finish in the performances, had added
to the repertoire all the great masterpieces,
and had introduced 'Fidelio' and 'Armida,' be
sides establishing other operas of Gluck's per
manently in Berlin. He had also mounted the
' Vestale ' and ' Cortez ' with the utmost care and
intelligence, and was entitled to boast that he
had made the Berlin opera the first in Germany,
as indeed every one allowed. Spontini found
neither blemishes to remove nor reforms to intro
duce. He had at his disposal a company of first-
rate artists, his power over them was practically
unlimited, and the king's confidence in him un
bounded. His obvious duty was to keep matters
up to the standard to which Briihl had raised
them.
He started with the best intentions. Briihl
was informed of various plans for increasing the
orchestra, establishing a training-school for the
chorus, and introducing new methods into the
existing singing-school. He was considering
the best means of educating the singers in the
dramatic part of their art, and drew up a new
set of rules for the band. Little, however, came
of all this, partly because several of Spontini's
proposals were already in existence in other
forms, and partly because of his own want of
purpose and temper. In fact, it soon came to
a trial of strength between him and Briihl. The
latter insisted, a little too firmly, on his rights as
supreme manager, and even appealed to the pub
lic through the press. Spontini, despotic, and
exceedingly sensitive as to publicity, referred to
his contract, which had been drawn up without
Briihl's concurrence, and which he declined to
interpret according to Briihl's views, and stated
specifically that he was subject to no one but the
SPONTINI.
King.^or possibly the Home-Minister also. Un
acquainted with Berlin or the German language,
and surrounded by a crowd of parasites, he
soon fell into mistakes which it was extremely
difficult to rectify with so suspicious a person.
A few months of ill-concealed irritation on
both sides led to open collision. On Oct. 25, at
a meeting to arrange the repertoire for the week,
with Bruhl in the chair, Spontini spoke of the
latter's sketch as ' parfaitement ridicule,' because
it did not contain at least two grand operas,
the 'Vestale' and 'Armida'; styled the pieces
selected 'des miseres, des niaiseries,' etc., and
talked in the most violent way of the Count's bad
management. Briihl tried to give him an idea
of what subordination meant in Prussia, but
subordination Spontini would not hear of. 'Don't
attempt to treat me,' he writes on Nov. 12, ' as
a mere subordinate, for I am nothing of the
kind, neither by my person, my character, my
contract, nor my talent ; for although my post
happens to be included in your department, it is
so in a wholly different sense from what you
appear, or pretend, to think.' The whole letter
is very angry, and very rude, and it was long
before the two were again on terms of even
outward civility. Briihl took his grievance
straight to the king, and peace was at length
re-established. The following extract will show
Briihl's opinion of Spontini at this time : —
' He is,' he writes to Witzleben, ' extremely passionate,
and once in a passion oversteps all bounds ; uses expres
sions which no man of honour can pardon, and then
considers his natural bad temper excuse enough for
anything. He is very suspicious, and at the same time
very credulous, putting himself at the mercy of any one
who will natter his vanity; and in consequence is sur
rounded by a host of unsatisfactory characters, who
make him their shuttlecock. His pride and vanity have
really reached the sublime of the ridiculous ; and temper,
sometimes assuming the guise of modesty, directs, or
rather misdirects, all his actions. . . . And to such a
man has been confided the conduct of business of more
than ordinary intricacy 1 '
This description, written under obvious irritation,
should in justice be counterbalanced by the con
sideration of Spontini's great qualities as an
artist. But that Briihl's estimate was in the
main correct, the sequel will show.
During the preparations for the first perform
ance of ' Olympia,' Spontini had an opportunity
of appearing before the court and public with a
new composition. In the beginning of 1821 the
Grand-Duke Nicholas, heir-presumptive to the
throne of Russia, and his consort, paid a visit to
Berlin, and court-festivities on a grand scale
were instituted in their honour. Moore's ' Lalla
Rookh ' was then much talked of, and Briihl
conceived the idea of representing the principal
scenes in a series of tableaux-vivants. Schinkel
undertook the scenery and arrangement of the
groups, and Spontini composed the songs, intro
ductory march, and dance-music. The perform
ance took place Jan. 2 7, 1 8 2 1 , at the Royal Palace,
and was pronounced to be the most brilliant and
quaintly beautiful thing of the kind ever seen.
The actors were all members of the court-circle :
Shah Jehander was played by Prince William,
now (1883) Emperor; Abdallah by the Duke
VOL. III. PT. 6.
SPONTINI.
673
of Cumberland; Jehanara by the Duchess; the
Peri by Princess Elise Radziwill ; Aliris by the
Grand-Duke Nicholas ; and Lalla Rookh by the
Grand-Duchess. On Feb. II the performance
was repeated before a select audience comprising
the most distinguished artists and scientific men
in Berlin. Hensel, Fanny Mendelssohn's hus
band, was commissioned by the King to paint the
tableaux, for presentation to the Grand Duchess.1
They were arranged in consecutive order : — first
the stories told by Feramors, then the 'Veiled
Prophet ' in two scenes ; ' Paradise and the
Peri,' and the 'Fire- Worshippers,' in three each.
Then the 'Feast of Roses' in pantomime. A
sort of running commentary on the representation
was furnished by a number of songs written by
Spiker, set by Spontini, and executed behind
the scenes by the best singers from the opera
and a small orchestra.2 Spontini's work con
sists of 4 instrumental and 6 vocal pieces. One
of the latter is a chorus of genii (3 soprani
and i tenor) sung while Nourmahal is sleeping,
and a real work of genius. The singers vocalise
on the A, while the instruments are playing a
light accompaniment. The other vocal pieces
are the songs, the second being a free translation
of the opening of 'Paradise and the Peri.'
Spontini's work now suffers from inevitable com
parison with Schumann's music. As an Italian
he had neither romantic imagination nor depth
of expression enough for the subject. But taking
the piece as a whole, it is possibly more in
character with Moore's poetry than the oratorio-
form chosen by Schumann.
The first performance of 'Olympia' was eagerly
anticipated. March 5, 1821, was first fixed, but
it was postponed till May 14, a delay for which
Spontini was entirely to blame. The translator,
E. A. Hoffmann, only got the last act from him
bit by bit, the chorus-master had not seen a note
of it by Feb. 18, nor had the ballet-master been
consulted. Spontini insisted on at least three
months rehearsals. The expenditure on the mise-
en-sc&ne was so lavish that even the king remon
strated. Statira was played by Milder, Olympia
by Schulz, and Cassander and Antigonus by Bader
and Blume. The chorus and orchestra were mate
rially strengthened, the scenery was by Schinkel
and Gropius, and there were 42 rehearsals. The
result was one of the most brilliunt and perfect
performances ever seen, and an enormous success.
Even Briihl was carried away, and wrote to
Milder, ' you have given us a perfect representa
tion, and added another flower to your crown as
an artist.' Spontini's triumph was complete.
Even his opponents acknowledged that 'Olympia'
had no rival among modern operas. Zelter wrote
to Goethe that he did not like the work, but
could not help going again and again.
Spontini's supremacy in the musical world
lasted exactly five weeks, but on June 18, 1821,
i The importance of this event in HensePs life may be seen from
the ' Mendelssohn Family,' vol. i. p. 93.
- 'Lalla Kukh. A festival play with songs and dances, performed
at the Royal Palace of Berlin. Jan. 27, 1821. Edited by Count Bruhl
and S. H. Spiker. Berlin, L. W. Wittich, 1822.' FF. score, Schlesinger
of Berlin.
Xx
674
SPONTINI.
'Der Freischutz 'was produced at thenewly erected
theatre in Berlin. Its immediate success may
not have more than equalled that of ' Olympia,'
but it soon became evident that the chief effect
of the latter was astonishment, while the former
set the pulse of the German people beating.
'Olympia' remained almost restricted to the
stage of Berlin, while the ' Freischiitz ' spread
with astonishing rapidity throughout Germany
and the whole world. Spontini could not conceal
that he had, on the morrow of a great triumph,
been completely vanquished by an obscure op
ponent, and that too after consciously doing his
very utmost. Even this might not have discouraged
him, but that in ' Der Freischutz ' he was brought
face to face with a phase of the German character
totally beyond his comprehension. He had no
weapons wherewith to encounter this opponent.
A man of weaker will would have contented
himself with such success as might still be
secured in Germany ; but Spontini could brook
no rival, and finding that he could not outdo
Weber's music, tried to suppress him by means
wholly outside the circle of art. As director-
general of music many such lay ready to his
hand, and that he knew how to use them is
shown by the fate of ' Euryanthe ' and ' Oberon '
in Berlin. The success of ' Freischutz ' did not
improve Spontini's relations with Briihl, a personal
friend of Weber's, and a greatadmirer of his music.
A little incident will show what treatment the
Intendant occasionally met with from the Di
rector: in March 1822 the former wished to have
the ' Nozze di Figaro,' and the latter ' Der Frei
schiitz,' upon which Spontini writes that the means
which Briihl 'is taking to attain his end with
regard to his favourite work do no credit either
to his taste or his impartiality.'
On the first night of ' Der Freischiitz,' the
following verses were circulated in the theatre,
the allusion being to the elephants in 'Olympia':
So lass dirs gefallen in unserm Eevier,
Hier bleiben, so rafen, so bitten wir;
TJnd wenn es auch keinem Elephantem gilt,
Du jagst wohl nach anderem, edlerem Wild. 1
From that hour the public was divided into two
parties. The national party, far the strongest in
intellect and cultivation, rallied round Weber.
The king and the court persistently supported
Spontini, though even their help could not make
him master of the situation. The Censorship
interfered to check the expression of public
opinion against him, and his complaints of sup
posed slights were always attended to.2 But
his artistic star, which had shone with such
lustre after the first night of ' Olympic,' was now
slowly setting.
The excellence of that first performance was
acknowledged even by Weber himself,3 and this
may be a good opportunity for some remarks on
Spontini as a director. Whether he had a specific
i 0 stay in our cover
We pray and entreat you ;
No elephants have we,
But worthier game.
2 Gubitz, ' Erlebnisse,' vol. iii. p. 241. Berlin, 1869.
3 ' Carl Maria von Weber ' by Mas von Weber, vol. ii. p. 306. Leip
zig, 1864.
SPONTINI.
talent for conducting cannot be determined, for
as a rule he conducted only two operas besides
his own — ' Armida ' and ' Don Juan,' and these
he knew thoroughly.* For the rest of the work
there were two conductors, Seidel and Schneider,
and two leaders, Mb'ser and Seidler.5 When
Spontini came to Berlin he had had very little
practice in conducting, and at first declined to
handle the bdton, but made the leader sit by
him in the orchestra, and give the tempo ac
cording to his directions. Indeed he never com
pletely mastered the technicalities of the art,
his manner of conducting recitatives especially
being clumsy and undecided. So at least says
Dorn,6 a competent witness, who had often seen
him conduct. In reading a score too he was
slow and inexpert;7 and at the Cologne Festival
of 1847 could scarcely find his way in his
own score of ' Olympia,' which he had not con
ducted for some time. He was thus very slow
in rehearsing a work, though not for this reason
only, for the same laborious accuracy which he
showed in composing was carried into every
detail of the performance. He never rested till
each part was reproduced exactly as it existed in
his own imagination, which itself had to be
cleared by repeated experiments. Inconsiderate
and despotic towards his subordinates, he wearied
his singers and band to death by endless repeti
tions, his rehearsals not unfrequently lasting from
8a.m. till 4 p.m., or from 5 p.m. till 1 1 at night.
He only treated others, however, in the same
way that he treated himself, for no trouble was
too great for him to take in revising his work
down to the smallest particulars. When the first
night arrived, every member of the orchestra
knew his work by heart, and Spontini might
beat as he liked, all went like clockwork.8 If
scenery or costumes which had been expressly
prepared did not please him he ordered others,
regardless of cost. Being a true dramatic artist,
his eye was as keen on the stage as his ear in
the orchestra, and everything, down to the
smallest accessories, must be arranged to express
his ideas. Soon after his arrival he fell out with
Briihl, because in the ' Vestalin ' he wanted Frau
Milder to carry the Palladium in public, whereas
Briihl maintained, on Hirt's authority, that the
Palladium was never shown to the people. He
was furious when it was suggested that the burn
ing of the fleet in ' Cortez ' should not take place
on the stage ; and he once went so far as to send
his wife to Briihl to request that a sleeve of
Schulz's dress might be altered ! In choosing his
actors he not only studied voice, temperament, and
dramatic skill, but was most particular about
appearance. A distinguished bass singer, recom
mended to him by Dorn for high-priest parts, was
not even allowed to open his mouth because he
was 'at least a foot and a half too short.' He
4 He conducted the 99th performance of ' Der Freischiitz' (Nov. 6,
1826), for the benefit of Weber's widow and children, which was much
to his credit considering his dislike to the piece.
5 Bernhard Weber died March 23, 1821.
6 ' Aus melnem Leben.' Part iii. p. 3.
7 Devrient's ' Kecollections of Mendelssohn,' p. 23.
8 Blume on ' Alcidor,' in the Theatre archives.
SPONTINI.
insisted on the complete fusion of the vocal and
instrumental, the dramatic and the musical ele
ments, and demanded from the chorus, as well as
the solo-singers, an entire absorption in their parts,
and an intelligent rendering of each situation.
His love for the grandiose and the awe-inspiring
led him to employ all the resources of decoration,
and what then seemed enormous masses of musi
cians, singers, and dancers ; and also to employ
the strongest accents and most startling contrasts.
'His forte' says Dorn, 'was a hurricane, his
piano a breath, his crescendo made every one open
their eyes, his diminuendo induced a feeling of
delicious languor, his sforzando was enough to
wake the dead.'1 In this respect he exacted the
very utmost from his singers and musicians. A
story is still told in the Berlin orchestra of a
bass passage in one of his operas which he could
not get loud enough, though he repeated it again
and again, the players in vain doing their utmost,
till at last — to Spontini's delight — the cellists hit
on the idea of singing their notes as well. He
insisted on Milder putting her whole force into
Statira's exclamation ' Cassander ! ' 2 and on one
occasion she so overstrained herself as to lose her
voice for the rest of the evening. From that
moment he considered her useless, and in 1829
had her pensioned off. Seidler-Wranitzky was
delicate, and her style more suited to Lieder and
serious music, so she found little favour with him,
in spite of her exquisite singing. 'II faut braver,
Madame,' shouted he, when she showed symptoms
ot exhaustion at a rehearsal of the ' Vestale' ; and
he was scarcely moved when she fainted. It
was not because he wrote un vocally, or over
loaded his voices with accompaniment, that his
parts were so trying — for he was too thorough an
Italian not to rely upon the voice for his chief
effects ; but it was his propensity to extreme
contrasts, and his want of consideration in re
hearsing. It soon became a general complaint
among women singers that Spontini ruined the
voice. Seidler asked leave to retire on this
account in 1826 ; in 1823 Milder begged that
' Olympia ' might not be given more than once a
fortnight, and Schechner refused an engagement
because she was afraid of Spontini's operas. Even
Schulz, who was devoted to him, was so angry
in March 1824 at the continual strain of her
heavy parts, as to lose her temper at rehearsal,
and speak so rudely that she would have been
punished had he not changed his mind.
Spontini's appearance at the head of his musi
cians was almost that of a general leading an army
to victory. When he glided rapidly through the
orchestra to his desk every member of the band
was in position, and on the alert to begin.
At such moments he looked an aristocrat to
the backbone, but also an autocrat who would
insist on subjugating all other wills to his own.
The pedantic side of his character also came out
in many little traits — he could only conduct from
a MS. score, and his desk must be of a certain
peculiar construction. His baton was a thick
1 ' Aus meinem Leben.' First collection, p. 127.
2 In the First Act of Olympia,
SPONTINI.
675
stick of ebony with a solid ivory ball at each
end ; this he grasped in the middle with his
whole fist, using it like a marshal's staff. 3
By May 14, 1821, the 'Vestalin,' 'Cortez,' and
'Olympia' had all been produced according to
the composer's own ideas at the Berlin opera,
where they long remained stock-pieces. But their
frequent repetition was more to gratify the King
than the public, and indeed the theatre had soon
to be filled by a large issue of free admissions.
Thus, for 'Olympia,' on Dec. 21, 1821, Spontini
obtained from the office 50 free tickets, besides
buying 25 more. In Sept. 1824 he urged the
Intendant not to raise the prices for grand operas
(meaning his own), or the public would soon
cease to come at all, and begged to have ' or
dinary prices ' in large letters on the bills for the
next performance of the ' Vestalin.' A new opera
of his was however still an exciting event, partly
because of his own personality and position,
partly because the public was sure of a splendid
spectacle. He was bound to furnish two grand
operas every three years ; ' Olympia ' counted as
one, and by the end of 1821 he was thinking of
the second. After much consideration he chose
the 'Feast of Roses,' from Moore's ' Lalla Rookh/
influenced no doubt by the success of his earlier
Festspiel, and the prospect, welcome to a slow
worker, of using portions of his old material ;
but the subject did not seem very congenial.
The libretto was written by Herklots, librettist
to the Opera. On March 22 Spontini wrote to
Briihl that he was working 17 hours a day on
the first act, and that there were only two. The
first performance of ' Nurmahal ' took place May
27, 1822, in honour of the marriage of the Prin
cess Alexandrina of Prussia, to whom the Em
peror dedicated the PF. score (Schlesinger). This
is not, as has often been said, merely a revised
version of ' Lalla Rukh,' comparatively little of
that music having been used in it. The intro
ductory march became no. 8 of the opera;
Nourmahal's song, no. 26 ; the drum chorus of
genii no. 20 ; and the ballet-music was mostly
retained. A song was also introduced from his
' Dieux rivaux,' and the ballet from the ' Dan-
aides ' (nos. 10 and 14).
The merits of the librettos of the 'Vestalin,'
' Cortez,' and ' Olympia,' outweigh their defects.
Not so however that of 'Nurmahal'; its plot
and characters are alike insipid, and it is in
fact a mere piece d'occasion. The oriental
colouring, which must have been its attraction
for Spontini, still forms its sole interest. But,
inferior as it is to 'Oberon,' it gives a high idea
of its author's dramatic instinct, when we con
sider the utter inability of French and Italian
composers as a rule to deal with the fantastic and
mythical. Its best numbers are the first finale,
the duet no. 1 7, and the duet with chorus no. 20.
There is a striking passage in the finale — the
lovers lying on opposite sides of the stage, and
the people dancing about them to a bacchante-
like strain, when suddenly the dance ceases, and
3 Richard Wagner's Erinnerung an Spontini ; Gesammelte
Schriften, vol. v. p. 116 (Leipzig, Fritzsche, 1872).
X
676
SPONTINI.
the voices hold on a chord of the seventh on E,
with an indescribable effect of unsatisfied long
ing. It is a stroke of true genius of which any
German composer of the romantic school might
be proud. The duet no. 17 contains some con
ventional thoughts, but the vehemence of its
passion is irresistible, and it seems to have been
the earliest instance of a kind of sentiment first
employed among German composers by Marsch-
ner, e.g. in no. 17 of his 'Templer und Jtidin.'
The spirit chorus no. 20 has a charming sound,
produced by means entirely new; though, com
pared with Weber's tone-pictures, it strikes the
hearer as superficial. It is impossible to help
this comparison for many reasons, one being that
in no. 21 of 'Nurmahal5 one of Spontini's genii
sings ' From Chindara's warbling fount I come.' *
A glance at the two compositions is enough to
show how far he fell short of the qualities re
quired for this kind of work. Nurmahal's songs
in the latter part are thoroughly insipid ; and
the interest falls off just where the climax should
have been reached. The rest of the piece con
tains much that is beautiful, especially some
passages in the Andantino malinconico, of start
ling novelty and expression, the gay introductory
chorus, and the melodious nos. 3, 4, and 5, so
entirely in Spontini's Neapolitan manner that
they might have been taken from his early
operas. Here and there are touches recalling
Mozart. The overture and ballets are brilliant
and festal, and the overture has an open-air
iness of style often found in Italian overtures.
Clumsy declamation, however, and wrongly ac
cented words, constantly betray that the com
poser is dealing with an unfamiliar language.
On June 9, 1821, Spontini started for a seven
months' leave. He went first to Dresden, and
there met Weber. Weber was cordial and oblig
ing, while Spontini, though polite in manner, took
pains to make his rival feel the newness of his
reputation as a composer.2 By June 29 he was
in Vienna trying to arrange a performance of
' Olympia ' for the following season ; but this
did not take place. Thence he went to Italy,
revisiting his birthplace ; and by September was
in Paris at work on the revision of 'Olympia.'
He also made some experiments on 'Milton,'
telling Bruhl (Jan. 12, 1823) that he would put
it before him in three different forms. By the
end of January he was back in Berlin, apparently
anxious to keep on good terms with Bruhl,
though such good resolutions seldom lasted long.
One of their many differences was on the subject
of star-singers (Gastspieler), These Bruhl wished
to encourage, as a means of testing the artists,
and their chance of popularity; but Spontini
disliked the system. An appearance of Carl
Devrient and Wilhelmine Schroder in the
summer of 1823 evoked another impertinent
letter to Bruhl, who in reply (July 7) told him
to mind his own business.
1 Weber's setting of these words was his last composition, dated
London, May 25, 1826. F. W. Jahns. ' C. M. von Weber in seinen
AVerken,' p. 409. Berlin. Schlesinger, 1871.
2 C. M. von Weber, by Max von Weber, ii. 433.
SPONTINI.
He had now been in office four years, and the
stipulated two grand operas every three years, or
smaller one each year, were only represented by
a scena or two for 'Olympia,' and a couple of
pieces for ' Nurmahal.' It was plain that he had
undertaken a task whdly beyond his strength,
owing to his pedantic manner of working. Be
thought (Aug. 2, 1823) of turning 'Milton' into
a grand opera with recitatives, choruses, and
ballets, but soon relinquished the idea, and by
Oct. 17 was 'busy, night and day, with Alcidor.'
The libretto was by The'auleon, who had for
merly altered ' Cortez.' ' On coming to Berlin,
in Nov. 1823, The'auleon found the first scene
already composed, and his business was to fit
words to the music. His task was not easy: 'If
I wrote lines of ten syllables,' he says, ' Spontini
wanted them of five ; scarcely had I hammered
out an unfortunate stanza of five, when it had
to be lengthened to twelve or fifteen, and if I
expostulated, on the ground that lines of that
length were not admissible in French poetry,
he would reply in a sort of recitative, accom
panying himself on the piano, "The translation
will make it all right." Never did so poor a
poem cost its author so much trouble.'3 It is
evident from this that Spontini composed to
French words, which were afterwards translated
byHerklots. Schinkel and Gropius again painted
the scenery. The rehearsals began in Sept. 1824,
and the first performance took place May 23,
1825. Its reception by Spontini's adherents was
unmistakably hearty, and many outsiders were
dazzled by its new effects of scenery and music,
but the national party were louder than ever
in their disapprobation. Among the adverse
critiques was a parody in the true Berlin style,
in which ' Alcidor eine Zauberoper ' was con
verted into 'Allzudoll eine Zauderoper.' * Zelter
alone was impartial, but he was no doubt in
fluenced by his prejudice against Weber, and all
that he can say is ' The piece was written by
The'auleon in French, and set to French music,
so we have at last a real Berlin original— that
is a new coat turned ' ; and again, ' Spontini
always reminds me of a Gold-King, flinging his
gold at the people, and breaking their heads
with it.'5 Not even a PF. score of 'Alcidor'
was published ; nor did it make its way beyond
Berlin, any more than ' Nurmahal ' had done.
The libretto is founded on the story of the
nine statues in the 'Arabian Nights.' But
the plot is weak, and the characters uninterest
ing. Spontini was induced to choose a super
natural story by the fashion of the day and the
success of the ' Freischiitz ' ; but in 'Alcidor,' as
to some extent in 'Nurmahal,' he was striving
against his own instincts. The German romantic
operas of this period, unlike the earlier Viennese
magic-operas, treated the supernatural element
seriously, and this was an important feature in
their success. But it required the deep sympathy
3 Ledebur, 'Berliner Tonkunstler-Lexicon,' p. 564.
4 Allzudoll, vulgarism for Allzutoll = quite too mad ; Zauderoper
= slow opera, because of the time it had taken to write.
5 Correspondence of Goethe and Zelter, Iv. 39, 40,
SPONTINI.
with the hidden forces of nature which makes a '
German look upon the world of spirits as so
many impersonations of those forces. An Italian
could only treat such a subject from the outside,
and it s;iys much for Spontini's dramatic talent
that he so frequently found appropriate, and in
some cases striking, expression for this spirit-life.
'Alcidor' might have succeeded, if it had not been
so soon followed by 'Oberon.' Spontini virtually
confessed that his conception was only a super
ficial one, by insisting on the most gorgeous
scenery. But the golden palaces and gardens,
the glittering statues, the columns of compressed
vapour, the living fire, the brilliant processions
and dances, required music of corresponding bril
liancy ; and his massive musical effects, so objected
to by his opponents, were only in keeping with
the rest. The tuned anvils in 'Alcidor' have
long been used as an illustration of the pitch to
which Spontini carried noise in his late? operas.
One would imagine that this detail must have
come from those who knew either the opera or
the score ; but the latter, now in the Imperial
library at Berlin, only shows three anvils tuned
to different notes, instead of ten., and the effect
is very much that of bells.1 The opening chorus
of the ist act, in which they occur, is one of the
finest numbers in the opera. The singers are
Ismenor's gnomes, occupied in destroying the
Temple of Love and forging ' chains for the world/
and after their boisterous declamation the song of
the mourning sylphs comes in as a most effective
contrast. The next chorus of dream-gods was
taken from 'Pelage' (see p. 6696), where it is
no. 6.
Another grand opera was due for the summer
of 1826, and a week after the production of
'Alcidor' Spontini asked Count Bru'hl whether
a revised and lengthened version of ' Milton '
would do for the purpose. The Count thought
the material too scanty, but the King (June 29)
agreed to the proposal. Spontini having ob
tained 1 1 months' leave, started for Paris, where
he was present at a revival of 'Olympic' on
Feb. 28, 1826, returning immediately afterwards
to Berlin. Nothing more was heard of 'Milton,'
and during this year he furnished no work for
the King's theatre. Ernst Kaupach was now
librettist to the opera, and Spontini agreed with
him on a subject from German medieval history,
which eventually became the opera 'Agnes von
Hohenstaufen.' The first act — long enough for
a complete opera — was ready by 1827, and per
formed May 28. The whole three acts were
finished in 1829, and produced June 12 for the
marriage of Prince Wilhelm, the present Ger
man Emperor. Spontini, dissatisfied with his
work, had the libretto altered by Baron von
Lichtenstein and other friends, and made more
vital changes in the music than in almost any
other of his grand operas. In this form it was
revived Dec. 6, 1837.
German medieval history at this time occupied
1 The song 'Vdnus n'avait pas tort,' from Gounod's ' Pbile'mon
et Baucis.' so finely sung by Mr Santley, has familiarised London
audiences with the anvil as an accompaniment.
SPONTINI.
677
much attention, and thus no doubt influenced
Spontini's choice of a subject. He set to work
with the seriousness which was his main charac
teristic as an artist; read, studied, and did
everything to imbue himself with the spirit of
the epoch, one wholly foreign to anything he
had before attempted.2 The libretto in its final
form was a good one on the whole. The scene
is laid at Mayence in 1194, during the reign of
the Emperor Henry VI. of Hohenstaufen, and
the plot turns on the factions of the Guelphs
and Ghibellines. Here Spontini was again in
his element — the grand historical drama of
1 Cortez ' and ' Olympia.' The work is of a
wholly different stamp from ' Nurmahal' and ' Al-
cidor,' and deserves to be ranked with his Paris
operas. In grandeur of conception it equals, and
occasionally surpasses, 'Olympic.' The latter
half of the and act is a colossal production,
unparalleled in operatic literature. It would be
impossible to add one iota to the passion which
rages through the scene, or to pile up one addi
tional element in the music without sacrificing
all clearness in the component parts. The
novelty of the local colouring, so distinct from
that of 'Cortez,' 'Olympia,' or 'Alcidor,' is ad
mirable. Gloomy, forceful, and melancholy, all
indicates the spirit of the heroic age. The
music too is thoroughly German, the harmonies
richer and more satisfying, the melodies quite
national in character; isolated passages recalling
Spohr, and even Weber, though without any
thing like servile imitation. Could anything be
more characteristic than the German waltz in
the finale of the ist act? The French knights
and troubadours, who contrast with the Ger
mans, are equally well defined. The music is
throughout the result of an entire absorption
in the dramatic situation and characters.3 A
comparison, of it with the sentimental ballad-
like effusions of even good German composers
under similar circumstances will serve to ac
centuate the difference between them and Spon
tini. Neither is there any sign of exhaustion of
inventive power. The stream of melody flows as
freely as ever; indeed there is a breadth, an
dan, and a fire in some of these melodies, to
which he rarely attains in his earlier operas —
instance the terzetto in the 2nd act, ' Ja, statt
meines Kerkers Grauen,' and Agnes' solo ' Mem
Konig droben.' The critiques of the da}' were
most unjustly severe ; but though the music was
never published the MS. score exists, and an
examination of it will fully bear out all that
we have said. It is not too late to form an
impartial judgment, and Germans should re
cognise that they have a duty to perform to
'Agnes von Hohenstaufen,' as the only opera
which deals worthily with a glorious period
of German history. When this has been fairly
acknowledged it will be time enough to look out
for its defects.
It was the last opera which Spontini completed.
2 ' Spontini in Deutschland,' p. 102 (Leipzig, Steinacker uud Hart-
knoch, 1830)
s As for instance the Nun's Chorus in the 2nd act .
678
SPONTINT.
Various new plans and schemes continued to
occupy him, as before, especially during the
latter part of his stay in Paris, when ' Louis IX,'
'La Colere d'Achille,'and 'Artaserse' had in turn
been thought of for composition. For a successor
to 'Olympia' he thought first of 'Sappho' or
of ' Die Horatier,' and then of two of Werner's
tragedies, ' Das Kreuz an der Ostsee ' and ' At-
tila,' but none of these projects appear to have
advanced far enough even for a preliminary re
hearsal. More progress was made with a poem
by his old friend Jouy, ' Les Athe"niennes,' first
offered him in 1819, and accepted in a revised
form in 1822. In a review of the poem1 written
in 1830 Goethe implies that the music was com
plete, but at Spontini's death nothing was found
but unimportant fragments.2 An opera founded
on English history occupied him longer. We
have already mentioned the revision of his ' Mil
ton.' His studies for this deepened his interest
in the English history of the iyth century. In
1830 Raupach wrote a libretto for a grand opera,
'Milton,1 which was bought by the committee of
nianagement for 30 Friedrichs d'or, and placed
at Spontini's disposal.3 The only portion of the
smaller opera retained was the fine Hymn to the
Sun. After completing the revision of ' Agnes
von Hohenstaufen ' Spontini wrote to the Inten-
dant (May 9, 1837) that he hoped in the winter
of 1838 to produce 'Milton's Tod und Busse fur
Konigsmord' (Milton's death, and repentance for
the King's execution). He spent the summer of
1838 in England, studying 'historical, national,
and local ' colouring for this ' historico-romantic '
opera. Raupach's poem, extended and revised
by Dr. Sobernheim, had now assumed a political
and religious tendency, so distasteful to the King
as to make him prohibit the opera. Further
alterations ensued, and it became 'Das verlorene
Paradies' (Paradise Lost). By May 1840 the
score of part of the 1st, and two-thirds of the
2nd act was complete. Up to March 1841 he
certainly intended finishing it, but not a note
of it has ever been heard. We may add that on
June 4, 1838, he mentioned a fairy-opera to the
King, and in Dec. 1 840 professed himself ready to
begin a new comic opera. He was apparently
bent on composing fresh dramatic works, and
often complained that the management did not
offer him sufficient choice of librettos; but he
was incapacitated from creation by his increasing
pedantry, and by the perpetual state of irritation
in which he was kept by his critics.
Spontini's other compositions during his re
sidence in Berlin are unimportant. A hymn for
the coronation of the Emperor Nicholas of Russia,
to words by Raupach, was performed at Berlin
Dec. 18, 1826, and May 9, 1827.* -A- cantata to
Herklots' words, 'Gott segne den Kb'nig,' had a
great success at the Halle Musical Festival in
1 Goethe's Works, Goedecke's edition, vol. xiii. p. 632» Cotta. Also
' Spontini in Deutschland,' p. 22. Leipzig, 1830.
2 Kobert's ' Spontini,' p. 34. Berlin, 1883.
3 In 'Spontini in Deutschland' this libretto is said to be by Jouy.
I have not been able to ascertain whether it was Jouy*s work revised
by Jtaupach, or an original production.
•* Raupach had intended to have tableaux vivants to each five stanzas ;
but this was not carried out.
SPONTINT.
Sept. 1829, which Spontini conducted so much to
the general satisfaction as to procure him an
honorary Doctor's degree from the University,
and a gold medal inscribed ' Liricce Tragoedice
Principi Germania meritorum cultrix.' A ' Do-
mine salvum fac regem,' a 12, with accompani
ment of organ, trumpets, celli, and basses, was
written on Oct. 15, 1840, for presentation to the
King. Besides these he published a number of
French, German, and Italian vocal pieces, with
PF. accompaniment, the best of which is ' Die
Cimbern,' a war-song for three men's voices. As
a mere matter of curiosity may be mentioned
that he set Goethe's ' Kennst du das Land,' and
the Italian canzonet 'Ninfe, se liete,' in which he
again clashed unconsciously with Weber's very
graceful composition to the same words (i8n).5
Considering his great position, Spontini did
not accomplish much for music in Berlin. At
the opera he made the band play with a fire, an
expression, and an ensemble, hitherto unknown,
forced the singers to throw themselves dramati
cally into their parts, and used every exertion
to fuse the different elements into one coherent
whole. That his standard was high and his
views enlightened must be admitted. He en
deavoured too to improve the existing school for
singers, and founded one for the orchestra. But
his efforts as a rule were concentrated on the
operas which he himself conducted — that is to
say, his own, Gluck's ' Armida,' and 'Don Juan.'
These works, through his genius, his influence
on his subordinates, and his almost absolute
power, he brought to a perfection then unequalled.
The pieces directed by his vice-conductors went
badly, partly because Spontini exhausted the
singers, and partly because he took little interest
in the general repertoire. He had, too, no power
of organisation or administration. As long as
the excellent material lasted which Briihl trans
ferred to him in 1820 this defect was not glaring,
but when his solo-singers began to wear out and
had to be replaced, it was found that he had not
the judgment, the penetration, nor the im
partiality necessary for such business. Up to
the autumn of 1827 he only concluded one en
gagement himself, and in that instance it was
a solo-singer who proved only fit for the chorus.
On the other hand he lost Sieber, a good bass,
by insisting on reducing his salary to 100 thalers,
and had shortly afterwards to re-engage him at
200, as there was no bass in the company capable
of taking the parts in his own operas. The art
of divining the taste of the public, of at once
meeting it, elevating and moulding it — the art,
in fact, of keeping the exchequer full without
sacrificing artistic position — this was wholly out
of his reach. At the King's theatre, the audiences
steadily fell off, especially after the opening of
the Konigstadt theatre in 1823. At times Spontini
seems to have felt his incapacity, but unfortun
ately he was deluded by his own vanity and
domineering temper, and the insinuations of so-
5 Ledebur gives a tolerably complete catalogue of Spontini's
smaller works; see p. WO. Also Marx, in the 'Berliner Allg. Mus.
Zeitung ' for 182G, p. 3U6.
SPONTINI.
called friends, into believing that the decline of
the opera was owing to Briihl, whereas Brulil
might have retorted that everything he pro
posed was met by a despotic and unreasoning
veto. The Count at length, in 1828, wearied
out by the unceasing opposition, resigned, and
was succeeded by Count Eedern, who received
from the King a fresh code of instructions,
somewhat circumscribing Spontini's powers, and
concentrating those of the management. Op
portunities for fresh differences still constantly
arose, and Count Redern had much to contend
with in Spontini's increasing irritability and in
consistency. In time even the admirers of his
music felt that his personal influence was bad,
and that the opera would never prosper as long
as he remained at its head.
Spon tini was to have the receipts of the first
nights of his own operas for his annual benefit,
or in default of such representations a sum of
4000 francs. In the latter case he might give a
concert, and in fact he gave a considerable num
ber, both vocal and instrumental. 'My concerts,'
in his own words, ' are dedicated to the great
masters, whose memory I strive to keep alive
with the public, while testifying my own respect
by performing their works in the most brilliant
and complete manner possible.' l His programmes
consisted principally of German music, Handel,
Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven. The first per
formance in Berlin of Beethoven's Symphony
in A was at a concert of Spontini's on May 12,
1824, and on April 30, 1828, he gave Beethoven's
C minor Symphony, the Kyrie and Gloria from
his Mass in D, the overture to ' Coriolanus ' and
the Credo from Bach's B minor Mass. As Bach's
Mass had only just been published by Nageli
of Zurich, Spontini was the first to introduce a
portion of it to the public of Berlin, as he had
been to acquaint them with Beethoven's masses.
The performance itself seems to have been a
poor one, and indeed it could hardly be otherwise,
Spontini not having much in common with Bach;
but the attempt was praiseworthy.2 Another
point to his credit was that he gave his support
to Moser's concerts. The King's band could not
play without his permission, so he might have
made difficulties if he had chosen. He never
could be brought to understand that the then
strong points of German music were chorus-
singing and instrumental music. With him
opera, especially his own, was everything, and
therefore with ail his efforts, honest as they were,
he did as much harm as good.
As we have already mentioned, Spontini's late
operas had no success outside Berlin. Except a
couple of stray performances of 'Olympia' at
Dresden and Darmstadt, they did not even gain
a hearing. Occasionally he conducted one of his
own works, as for instance the ' Vestalin ' at
Munich3 (Oct. 7 and n, 1827), and Hamburg*
1 Oubitz's ' Erlebnisse,' iii. 2-12.
2 Marx, ' Berliner Allg. Mus. Zeitung,' 182?, pp. 14fi and 152.
3 Grandaur, ' Chronik des kOnigl. Theaters in Miinchen,' p. 106.
Munich, 1878.
* Schmidt's 'Denkwurdigkeiten.' Edited by Uhde. Part ii. p. 314.
Stuttgart, Cotta, 1878.
SPONTINI.
679
(Sept. 18, 1834). But such personal contact
does not seem to have led to sympathetic rela
tions. Speaking generally, the ' Vestalin ' and
' Cortez ' were the only operas of his appreciated
in Germany.
In Berlin itself each year added to the num
ber of his opponents. In 1824 Marx entered
the lists in his behalf in his Zeitung, and
was seconded by Dorn ; but Dorn left Berlin in
March 1828, and Marx, though sincerely at
tached to Spontini, occasionally admitted adverse
critiques. Spontini was morbidly sensitive to
public opinion, and the loss of his defenders was
a serious one. Against the advice of judicious
friends he replied in person to anonymous at
tacks, suffered flatterers to use unpractised pens
in his behalf, and even called in the Censorship.
Such steps could but damage his cause. The
opposition was headed by Rellstab, the editor of
the Vossische Zeitung, an experienced litterateur
with some knowledge of music, a great ally of
Weber's, and a blind opponent of everything
foreign. In nos. 23 to 26 of the year 1827 of
Marx's Zeitung appeared an article utterly
demolishing the first act of 'Agnes von Hohen-
staufen.' Dorn made a successful reply in nos.
27 to 29, but far from being silenced Rellstab
published a book, 'Ueber mein Verhaltniss als
Kritiker zur Herrn Spontini,' 5 in which he
unsparingly attacked Spontini as a composer"
and director, and exposed the absurd tactics of
the Spontini clique.6 The clique put forth a
defence called 'Spontini in Germany, an impar
tial consideration of his productions during his
ten years residence in that country' (Leipzig,
1830). It was however anything but impartial,
was ignorant and badly done.7
Spontini's ten yeai-s contract finished in 1830 ;
it was renewed, on terms more favourable to
the Intendant-General, and this, with the fact of
his ceasing to compose, gave an opportunity
to his enemies, and an unfortunate indiscretion
on the part of one of his friends played into their
hands. Dorow of Halle, the archaeologist, in a
collection of autographs (1837) inserted a letter
from Spontini (Marienbad, Aug. 12, 1836) lament
ing the degeneracy of the dramatic composers of
the day. It was done in good faith, Dorow
honestly believing that he was serving (Spon
tini by thus publishing his opinions without au
thority; but his opponents issued the letter in a
separate pamphlet with a German translation,
and ' explanatory ' remarks, in which Spontini was
fiercely attacked in terms of ironical respect.8
In the same year, in nos. 101 and 102 of the
'Komet,' appeared a pasquinade by a student
named Thomas, stating that Spontini had opposed
the production of ' Robert leDiable,' the ' Postilion
5 Leipzig, Whistling, 1?27.
6 It has been often, and even recently, stated that two art'cles by
Kellstab in CScilia ('Aus dem Xachlass eines jiingen Kiinstlers,'
vol. iv. pp. 1-42, and 'Julius. Eine musikalische Novelle,' vol. vi.
pp. 1-108) refer to Spontini. This is quite untrue, but it shows how
carelessly damaging statements about Spontini are repeated.
7 Attributed, quite untruly, to Dorn.
8 ' The Lament of Herr Kitter Gasparo Spontini .... over the de
cline of dramatic music. Translated from the French, with ex
planatory remarks by a body of friends and admirers of the great
master.' Leipzig, Michelsen, 1837.
680
SPONTINT.
de Longjumean,' and 'La Muette de Portici,' till
obliged to yield to the express command of the
King ; that a new code of instructions had altered
his position, and made him entirely subordinate
to the Intendant ; that he had been reprimanded
for selling his free admissions, and had had them
•withdrawn ; that the engagements of certain
singers contained a clause stipulating that they
should not be obliged to sing in Spontini's operas,
etc., etc.
Thomas, when called to account, referred to
an 'official of high position' as his authority.
And indeed there was a certain amount of truth
in the charges. Without directly opposing the
production of the operas mentioned, he had not
hesitated openly to avow his dislike of them ; no
new code of instructions had just then been is
sued, but that of 1831 did materially strengthen
the Intendant's position, and to a certain extent
make the Director-general his subordinate. Spon-
tini had not himself sold free admissions, but his
servant had, and in consequence the allotted
number had been diminished, very much to his
mortification. It was advisable, however, to
prevent such a newspaper scandal from reaching
the King's ears, so Count Eedern replied, con
tradicting all the false statements, and passing
over in silence all the true ones ; Thomas was
induced to make a public apology, and the affair
seemed at an end. But Spontini's troubles were
not yet over ; and his unpopularity was so great
that worse attacks might be expected.
On June 7, 1840, King Frederic William Til.
died, and Spontini's one mainstay was gone.
Though obliged occasionally to express displea
sure at his perpetual squabbles with the In-
tendant, the King had been steadfast in his
attachment to Spontini and his music. The
new King made no change in his position, but
his sympathies were in a different direction, and
no place was destined for Spontini in the grand
designs he was elaborating. This soon became
known. If Spontini could have kept himself
quiet the change might have been delayed, but
he was injudicious enough to lay before the King
a paper complaining of the Management and of
Count Eedern. The King questioned the In
tendant, and was satisfied with his explanations,
but to obviate all appearance of partisanship he
appointed a commission to enquire into Spon
tini's grievances. In the meantime the press
had taken up the matter. A definite attack was
made, to which Spontini was unwise enough to
reply (Leipzig Allgemeine Zeitung of Jan. 20,
1841) in such a manner as to give Count Redern
ground for an indictment for Use-majesU, and (on
Feb. 5) to a direct reprimand from the King.
But this disgraceful treatment of the royal
house by a foreigner who had enjoyed for years
almost unexampled court favour immensely in
creased the public feeling against Spontini, and for
two months he remained in private. On April 2,
however, in spite of repeated warnings, he took
his seat to conduct 'Don Juan.' His appearance
was the signal for a tremendous uproar, and
cries of 'hinaus! hinaus ! ' — 'off! off!' He
SPONTINI.
stood firm, began the overture, and would have
proceeded with the opera, but a rush was made
to get at him on the stage, and he was forced
to retire from the theatre. He never entered it
again as conductor.
The trial kept Spontini in Berlin all the sum
mer, but he obtained leave from Aug. 31 to Dec.
10, and went to Paris. His connection with the
opera was severed by the King on Aug. 25, on
terms of royal generosity. He was to retain his
title and full salary, and live where he pleased,
' in the hope that in repose he might produce
new works, which the King would hail with
pleasure if he chose to conduct them in person
at Berlin.' To these munificent arrangements
no conditions whatever were attached. Spontini
was convicted of tise-majestt, and condemned to
nine months' imprisonment, a sentence confirmed
by the higher court to which he appealed, but
remitted by the King. In the face of all this
he had the effrontery to demand a further sum
of 46,850 thalers, on the ground that the Man
agement had not supplied him with a sufficient
number of librettos, whereby he had lost the
sum guaranteed him for first nights, besides
profits from other performances and from pub
lishers — reckoned at 3000 thalers for each
opera ! The King referred him to the law-
courts, but Spontini's better nature seems at
length to have prevailed, and he withdrew his
application Dec. 23, 1841. When he finally left
Berlin in the summer of 1842 the King granted
him a further sum of 6000 thalers. His friends
gave him a farewell concert on July 13, 1842,
for which he wrote both words and music of
a song, duly performed and printed, of which a
copy is appended.1
ADIEU A MES AMIS DE BERLIN.
(20 Juillet, 1842.)
ELEGEE.
(Annonce.)
Asyle cher,2 oil ma Lyre ou Musette
A trop longtems3 soupir6 sous mes doigts;
Te'moin discret de ma peine secrette,
Ecoute-moi pour la derniere fois !
(Explication.)
Je vais partir ! he'las, 1'heure est sonne'e,
A mes Amis je dis adieu ! . . . .
Plus ne reviendra la journe'e
Qui me ramene dans ce lieu ! . . . .
De vous revoir, Amis, plus d'esperance,
Quand je m'exile sans retour !
Eteruelle sera 1'absence !
Eternel sera mon amour !
(Reflexion.)
Pleurez, Amisr o vous, qu'un sort funeste
Arrache du toit paternel !
Souvent uri doux espoir nous reste !
Mais 1'adieu peut etre Eternel !
(Application.)
Adieu, me dit un tendre pere
En me pressant contre son sein !
De mes pleurs j'inondais sa main I ...
Et cette fois fut la derniere
Qu'il dit adieu? ce tendre pere,
Qu'en larmes, il me dit adieu !
The emotion expressed in these lines was no
feigned one. Spontini felt leaving Berlin very
1 Given as printed. It seems to have been a little different at the
performance. See Bobert, p. 52, etc.
2 His study. 3 Twenty-three years.
SPONTINI.
much, and at the close of the concert could not
speak for tears.
He left few friends behind him. His suc
cessor at the opera was Meyerbeer, who, with
Mendelssohn, received the title of 'Generalmusik-
director.' Neither had very friendly feelings
towards him, and their paths as artists widely
diverged from his. He is however to this day
gratefully remembered by the few surviving
members of the King's band. The orchestra
were proud of their majestic conductor, who so
often led them to triumph, and who moreover
had a tender care for their personal interests.
The poorer members found his purse ready of
access, and in 1826 he established a fund for
them, called by special permission the ' Spontini-
Fonds,' to which he devoted the whole proceeds
of his annual benefit concerts. The fund speedily
attained to considerable proportions, and still
exists, though the name has been changed.
That he was badly treated by the Berlin public
is indisputable. His ill-natured, unjust, spiteful
attacks must have been very irritating, as even
those who do not belong to the super-sensitive
race of artists can understand, but the last scene
at the opera looks like a piece of simple brutality,
unless we remember that the real ground of
offence was his being a foreigner. The political
events of the period beginning with the War of
Liberation had roused a strong national feeling
in Prussia. The denial of a Constitution had
concentrated attention on the stage, which thus
became a sort of political arena ; and that a
foreigner, and moreover a naturalised French
man, should be laying down the law in this
stronghold was intolerable.
In Spontini's character great and mean quali
ties were almost equally mixed, so that both
friends and foes could support their statements
by facts, while each shut their eyes to the
qualities which they did not wish to see. After
his friends had been silenced by the catastrophe
of 1841 the verdict of his opponents prevailed, at
any rate throughout Germany ; but this verdict,
we say emphatically, was unjust. The charge
that he despised and neglected German music is
simply untrue. That he admired and loved our
great masters from Handel to Beethoven he
proved through life in many ways. Robert re
lates on unquestionable authority that he made
great sacrifices for the family of Mozart. When
Nissen published his biography Spontini exerted
himself immensely to get subscribers, personally
transmitted the money to the widow, superin
tended the translation of the book into French,
and rendered all the help in his power.1 A pre
ference for his own works must be conceded to
any artist actively engaged in production, nor is
it reasonable to expect from him an absolutely
impartial judgment of the works of others.
Weber's music was incomprehensible and anti
pathetic to Spontini, and this did him as much
injury in Berlin as anything else. But his delay
in performing 'Euryanthe' and 'Oberon' was
caused more by inaction than opposition. For
i Robert, p. 56, etc.
SPONTINI.
681
Spohr he had a great respect, as he often proved.2
In Meyerbeer he took a great interest, until
the appearance of ' Robert le Diable,' which
he could not bear, calling it ' un cadavre ';
but this is no reflection on his taste. For
the non- performance of the ' Huguenots ' he
was not responsible, as the prohibition was the
King's. He was certainly not justified in calling
Marschner's ' Templer und Jiidin ' an ' arrange
ment after Spontini ' — always supposing that the
expression was his — but everybody knows that
Marschner was deeply influenced by him. He
was by no means free from envy and jealousy,
but, taking for granted that he allowed himself
to be swayed by his passions, foreign composers
suffered just as much at his hands as German
ones. Cherubini he thought very highly of (he
mounted 'Les Abencerrages ' and sent the com
poser a considerable sum from the proceeds), but
Auber's 'Muette de Portici,'and Halevy's ' Juive*
he thoroughly disliked, took no trouble about
their production, and was much annoyed at their
pleasing the public. Nor did he like Rossini,
his own countryman. His horizon was limited,
but if it is possible to reconcile genius with
narrow-mindedness, if Spohr may be forgiven for
appreciating Beethoven only partially, and Weber
not at all, we must not be too hard on Spontini.
It is sad to see the incapacity of even culti
vated people in Berlin to be just towards him.
The Mendelssohn family, at whose house he at
one time often visited, and to whom he showed
many kindnesses, were never on good terms with
him after the appearance of the ' Hochzeit des
Camacho.'3 He may not have done justice to
that youthful work, but it is a pity that the
noble-minded Mendelssohn should have per
mitted himself the angry and contemptuous ex
pressions to be found in his letters.4 The painful
close of Spontini's career was enough to atone
for all his shortcomings. To pursue the rancour
against him over his grave, as has been done
recently in Germany, is wholly unworthy.
Of his last years there is little to relate. On
leaving Berlin he went to Italy, and in Jan.
1843 was in Majolati. He had visited his
native land several times since 1822. In 1835
he was in Naples, at San Pietro in Majella, and
they showed him an exercise he had written
40 years before when a pupil at the ' Turchini.'
He looked at it with tears in his eyes, and then
begged the librarian to tear up 'queste meschine
e sconce note' (those wretched mis-shapen notes)
and throw them in the fire.5 In 1838 he was in
Rome, and wrote (-June 4) to the King offering
his services as mediator between himself and the
Pope on the subject of the disturbances in"
Cologne.6 In 1843 he left Italy and settled at
2 The statement in the 'Mendelssohn Family,' vol. i. p. 124. that
he threw obstacles in the way of the performance of 'Jessomla1
is quite unfounded. The minutes of the King's Theatre prove the
contrary.
3 Devrient's 'Eecollections,' p. 23.
4 Among others see Devrient. p. 74.
5 Florimo, ' Cenno Storico,' p. 595.
6 Whether anything came of this offer isnot known, but Gregory XVI.
had a high esteem for Spontini. and asked for his views on the
restoration of Catholic church-music.
682
SPONTINI.
Paris, where lie had many pleasant connections
through his wife, an Erard. He had been a
member of the Institute since 1838. In 1844
the Pope made him Count of S. Andrea, and
other distinctions followed. But the hope ex
pressed by King Frederic William IV. that he
would produce other works was not realised ;
Berlin had broken him down physically and
mentally. He revisited Germany two or three
times. In 1844 he was in Dresden, where
Eichard Wagner had prepared for him a per
formance of the ' Vestale,' which he conducted
with all his old energy.1 He was invited to the
Cologne Musical Festival of May 1847 to con
duct some excerpts from ' Olympie,' and had a
warm reception, but was too infirm to conduct,
and his place was taken by Dorn, then Capell-
meister at Cologne.2 In August he visited
Berlin, and was most graciously received by the
King, who gave him an invitation to conduct
some of his own operas at Berlin during the
ensuing winter. He was much delighted, and
thought a great deal about the performances
after his return to Paris, and also of the best
manner in which he could express his gratitude
and devotion to the King; but the project was
never realised, as he was ill all the winter. In
1848 he became deaf, and his habitual gravity
deepened into depression. He went back to
Italy, and settled at Jesi, where he occupied
himself in founding schools and other works of
public utility. In 1850 he removed to Majolati,
and there died Jan. 14, 1851. Having no children
he lefc all his property to the poor of Jesi and
Majolati. [P.S.]
SPONTONE, or SPONTONI, BARTOLOMMEO,
a madrigal composer, of whom nothing appears
to be known beyond the fact that he published
three sets of madrigals for five voices at Venice
in 1564 (2nd ed. 1583), 1567, and 1583. Others
are contained in the collections of Waelrant
(1594) an(l others. Cipriano de Rore prints a
Dialogo a 7 by him in 1568. A fine 4-part
madrigal of Spontone's, 'The joyous birds,' is
given by Mr. Hullah in his Part Music. [G.]
SPORLE, NATHAN JAMES, whose real name
was Burnett, born 1812, a tenor singer with an
agreeable voice, first appeared in public about
1832 at the Grecian Saloon. He afterwards be
came a dinner singer, but was best known as the
composer of many pleasing songs and ballads,
one of which — 'In the days when we went
gipsying' — was very popular. He died March 2,
1853- [W.H.H.]
SPRING GARDEN. See VAUXHALL.
SPRINGING BOW (Ital. Saltato or Spicato;
Fr. Sautillf). This kind of bowing is produced
by the bow being dropped down on to the string
from some distance, whereby, owing to the elas
ticity of the stick, it is set vibrating, and made
to rebound after each note.
There are two principal kinds of springing bow.
1 For a clever and amusing account of It see Wagner's 'Gesam-
melte Schriften,' v. 114.
2 Dorn's ' Aus meiuem Leben,' vol. iii. p. 21.
SPRUCHE.
I. The Spicato — chiefly used for the execution
of quick passages formed of notes of equal dura
tion — is produced by a loose movement of the
wrist, about the middle of the bow. Well-known
instances of it are the finale of Haydn's Quartet
in D (op. 64, no. 5) —
-JJ-
:Ec«E
:«gic5^sa_._i_i_i_
«- -«-H— -^ •!*>-•-
te£
=?=i:
etc
the quick passages in the finale of Mendelssohn's
Violin-concerto —
-*-*-
etc.
or Paganini's Perpetuum mobile. The Spicato is
marked by dots over the notes. The so-called
Mai-tele* (hammered), indicated by dashes—
t T
~7\~
» m
/tU-
— is not really a kind of springing bow, but
merely indicates that a passage is to be executed
by short strongly accentuated strokes of the bow,
which however has not actually to leave the
string as in the ' springing bow.'
2. The Saltato, for which the bow is made to
fall down from a considerable distance, and there
fore rebounds much higher than in the Spicato.
This kind of bowing is chiefly used where a
number of notes have to be played in one stroke
of the springing bow, as in arpeggios (Cadenza of
Mendelssohn's Violin-Concerto), or such phrases
as the first subject of the Finale of the same
work —
which, if played as a firm staccato would sound
heavy. Another well-known instance of the sal
tato is the beginning of the Finale of Paganini's
first Concerto.
.it
jp JO:
3. A kind of quick staccato, much employed
by Paganini and the modern French School, must
be mentioned here, because it is really a kind
of saltato ; the bow being violently thrown down,
and so being made to rebound a great many
times for a long succession of notes in such quick
time that their execution by a firm staccato and
a separate movement of the wrist for each note
would be impossible. [P«D-]
SPRUCHE — proverbs, or sentences — are sung
in the Lutheran service of the Berlin Cathedral
after the reading of the Epistle :
1. On New Year's Day, 'Herr Gott du bist
unser Zuflucht.'
2. On Good Friday, ' Um unser Su'nden willen.'
3. On Ascension day, ' Erhaben o Herr. '
4. On Christmas day, 'Frohlocket, ihr Volker.'
SPEUCHE.
Mendelssohn set these for 8 part-chorus ; and
in addition 2 more : —
5. For Passion week, 'Herr geclenke nicht
unser Ubelthaten.'
6. For Advent, ' Lasset uns frohlocken.'
The six form op. 79 of his .works. No. 3 (' Er-
haben') begins with the same phrase as his i I4th
Psalm, op. 51, but there the resemblance ceases.
No. 2 is dated Feb. 18, 1844, and no. 5 (in
minims and for 4-part chorus) Feb. 14, 1844, and
each of the two is inscribed ' vor dem Alleluja '
-before the Alleluia. They are mostly short,
the longest being only 50 bars in length. — Schu
mann has entitled one of his little PF. pieces
'Spruch'; but on what ground is not obvious. [G.]
SQUARE PIANO (Fr. Piano carrt; Ital.
Pianoforte a tavola ; Germ. Tafel (tafelformiges)
Pianoforte). The rectangular or oblong piano,
much in vogue for domestic use until superseded,
especially in England and France, about the
middle of this century by the upright or cottage
piano. Inventors were fortunate in having keyed
instruments ready to their hands, such as the
harpsichord and clavichord, in which the problem
of resonance had long been successfully resolved;
leaving touch as dominated by power, and resist
ance to the inevitably increased tension, as
distinct aims to pursue. The clavichord became
the square piano by the addition of a second
bridge, and the substitution of a simple hammer-
and-damper mechanism for the tangents and
string-cloth ; but the keys were at first left
crooked, as in the clavichord. [See CLAVICHORD.]
The wing-shaped Grand piano, the 'Gravicem-
balo col piano e forte ' of Cristofori, had been in
existence 50 years when the organ-builder Frie-
derici of Gera (1712-1779), the builder of the
Chemnitz organ, is said to have made the first
Square piano. He named it 'Fort Bien,' a pun
on Forte Piano. No writer has described one of
these, or appears to have seen one. He may have
contrived the action as an improvement on the
idea which Schroeter first published in Marpurg
in 1764, and Zumpe introduced here in 1765-6.
From comparison of dates and other circum
stances, we are however inclined to conclude
that Zumpe did not imitate Friederici, but that
the latter may rather have used that rudimentary
German action which Stein in the next decade
improved for grand pianos by the addition of a
mechanical escapement. [See PIANOFORTE,1
p. 718 a.] This action of a centred hammer with
moveable axis, the blow caused by contact of
the hammer-tail with a back-touch, and without
escapement, exists in a drawing of a patent of
Sebastien Erard's dating as late as i8oi,2 which
shows how general this action had been. M.
Mahillon has kindly communicated to the writer
1 It must b2 remarked that "Welcker von Gontershausen, whose
technical works (published 1856 and 1870, the earlier much the better)
oti the construction of the Pianoforte are worthy of praise, is not
always to be depended upon when the question is historical. He
attributes this rudimentary action, of which he gives drawings, to
Schroeter and the Silbermanns— apparently without foundation.
2 Erard's claim to improvement was that the travelling distance of
the hammer could be regulated by a springing back-touch, by which
the depth of front-touch was made to depend upon the strength
expended by the player.
STABAT MATER.
683
that there is still a square piano existing with
this action, belonging to M. Gosselin, of Brussels.
The style of the furniture of the case and the
fragments of painting remaining would make this
instrument French, and place the date, according
to these authorities, without doubt in the reign
of Louis Quinze. It has five stops, to raise the
dampers (now unfortunately gone) in two sec
tions, to bring on a ' Pianozug ' in two sections,
or, apparently, as a whole. [See SORDINI.] The
natural keys are black. Now J. Andreas Stein
worked in Paris about 1 758, and later J. Heinrich
Silbermann of Strassburg made pianos which
were sent to Paris and highly thought of. We
regret that we have no further historical evi
dence to offer about this action, so interesting as
the foundation of the celebrated ' Deutsche Me-
chanik' of the Viennese grand pianos. The in
troduction of the Square piano into London by
Zumpe, and its rapid popularity, are adverted
to under PIANOFORTE, where John Broadwood's
great improvement in changing the position of
the wrestplank is also duly recognised.
The next important step in the enlargement
and improvement of the Square piano appears to
have been made in France by Petzold,3 who in
1806, in the Paris Exhibition of the products of
National Industry, exhibited a Square piano
with an extended soundboard, an improvement
at first not much noticed, though afterwards
developed with great success, and probably in
dependently, by the Collards and Broadwoods of
that time. Pape introduced the lever and notch
principle of the English Grand action into the
Square piano action in 1817. Further improve
ment of the Square piano, in the application of
metal to resist tension, etc., followed closely upon
that of the Grand; and in America theSquare out
stripped the Grand by being first experimented
on for the iron framing, the cross stringing, etc.,
which, through the talent and energy of the
Meyers, Chickerings, and Steinways, have given
a distinctive character to the American manu
facture. The Americans brought their Squares
almost to the size and power of their Grands, and
make them still ; and with the same tendency as
in Europe, to their being superseded entirely by
the smaller Grands and Uprights. [A.J.H.]
STABAT MATER (Planctus Beata Virginia
Marice ; The Lamentation of the Blessed Virgin
Mary). A Sequence or Prose, appointed, in the
Roman Missal, to be sung between the Epistle
and the Gospel, at High Mass, on the Friday in
Passion Week, and the Third Sunday in Sep-
tember : and divided into three portions, in the
Antiphonarium, for use, on the same two days,
as Office Hymns. The Stabat Mater is also
sung, in the Sistine Chapel, as an Offertorium,
on the Thursday in Holy Week ; and it has long-
been the custom, both here and on the Continent,
to interpose its separate stanzas between the
3 GUILLAUME LEBRECHT PETZOLD, born, according toFe'tis, in 1784,
at Lichtenhayn, Saxony, was apprenticed to Weiizky, Dresden, in 1798,
and worked for Walther, Vienna, from 1803 to 1805. In 1806 he joined
Pleiffer in Paris, a connection which lasted till 1814. According to
Welcker, Petzold invented the crank lever action since much used
by different makers.
684
STABAT MATER.
fourteen divisions of the Stations of the Cross.
The Poem written, towards the close of the
1 3th century by Jacobus de Benedictis,1 is one
of the finest examples of mediaeval Latin prose,
second only to the ' Dies irae ' of Thomas de
Celano. Several readings of it are extant ; 2 the
one most frequently set to Music being that
which immediately preceded its last revision in
the Roman Office-Books. There are also at
least four distinct versions of its Plain C haunt
Melody, apart from minor differences attribut
able to local usage. The most important of these
is one in the First Mode, given in the Ratisbon
edition of the Gradual. The Ratisbon Vesperal
contains another, in the same Mode, but entirely
different. The Mechlin Office-Books contain
yet another distinct form, in the .Fourth Mode.
Finally, it seems to'have been sung, in the 15th
century, to a Melody, in the Thirteenth Mode,
known also as ' Comme feme.'
The beauty of the Poem has rendered it so
great a favourite with Composers, that the num
ber of fine settings we possess is very great. The
earliest example that demands special notice is
the 'Stabat Mater' of Josquin des Pre"s, founded
upon the Canto fermo just mentioned, in the
Thirteenth Mode transposed.3 So elaborate is
the construction of this work, that not one of the
most highly-developed of the Composer's Masses
surpasses it. The Canto fermo is sustained by
the Tenor, in Larges, Longs, and Breves, through
out, while four other Voices accompany it, in
Florid Counterpoint, in constant and ingenious
Imitation of the most elaborate character.
Secunda Pars.
E - - ja ma - - - - ter,
etc.
fons
a - - mo - ns
But not even Josquin's masterpiece will bear
comparison with the two grand settings of the
' Stabat Mater' by Palestrina, either of which,
as Baini observes, would alone have sufficed to
immortalise him. The first and best-known of
these, written for a Double-Choir of eight Voices,
has long been annually sung, in the Sistine
J Ob. 1306.
2 See Daniel's ' Thesaurus Hymnologicus." (Halis, 1841.)
3 Pietro Aron quotes this fine Composition as an example of the
Fifth Mode; and Zarlino, as one of the Eleventh. For an explanation
of these apparent discrepancies, see vol. ii. p. 342 a, and vol. iii.
p. 261 a, in foot-note. The work was first printed in Petrucci's ' Mo-
tetti della Corona,' Lib. iii. No. 6 (Fossombrone, 1519). About forty
years ago, Choron reprinted it in Score, in Paris ; and in 18S1 it was
given in the Notenbeilagen to Ambros's 'Geschichte der Musik,' p. 61.
The ' Gluck Society ' performed it, in London, on May 24, 1881. ]
STABAT MATER.
Chapel, on tlie Thursday in Holy Week, and was
first published by Burney in his 'La Musica
della Settimana Santa,' on the authority of a
copy given to him by Santarelli.4 It is enough
to say that the Composition signalises the author
of the ' Missa Papas Marcelli ' in every page ;
and, that the opening phrase, containing a pro
gression of three Major Chords, on a Bass de
scending by Major Seconds, produces one of the
mo*t original and beautiful effects ever heard in
Polyphonic Music.
Chorus I.
Sta - bat ma * ter do - - - lo - ro -
sa, Jux - ta cru - cem la - cry - mo - sa, Dum
Chor. II.
pen -de - bat Fl - li - us.
Palestrina's second 'Stabat Mater' is written
for twelve Voices, disposed in three Choirs ; and
is, in every way, a worthy companion to the pre
ceding work,5 Ambros, indeed, denies its au
thenticity, and, on the authority of an entry
in the catalogue of the Altaemps-Ottoboni Col
lection in the Library of the Collegio Romano,
refers it to Felice Anerio, notwithstanding Baini's
decisive verdict in its favour : but, the internal
evidence afforded by the work itself is enough to
remove all doubt on the subject. It is not only
a genuine work, but one of the finest Palestrina
ever wrote. For the effect produced by the union
of the three Choirs, at the words, '0 quam tristis,'
as well as the manner of their alternation, in
other parts of the Sequence, we must refer our
readers to the work itself, in the 7th volume of
Breitkopf & Hartel's complete edition.
Few modern settings of the 'Stabat Mater,'
with Orchestral Accompaniments, are finer than
(i) that by Pergolesi, for Soprano and Contralto,
accompanied by Strings and Organ (to which
Paisiello afterwards supplied 'Additional Ac
companiments' for Wind). (2) Haydn's ' Stabat
4 It was afterwards published, in Paris by Choron ; and by Alfieri,
in his 'Raccolta di Musica sacra," vol. vi. (Roma, 1845.) It has since
appeared in vol. vii. of Breitkopf 's complete edition. For an inter
esting criticism upon it see Oulibichef's 'Nouvelle Biographie de
Mozart,' ii. 72. He wat perhaps the first to call attention to it. It
has been recently edited, with marks of expression, introduction of
solo voices, and other changes, by Wagner.
s First printed in Alfleri's ' Baccolta,' vol. vii. (Roma, 1846).
STABAT MATER.
Mater' is a treasury of refined and graceful
Melody. (3) Next in importance to this we
must rank a very fine one, for six Voices, with
Accompaniments for two Violins, three Viole,
Basso, and Organo, composed by Steffani, who
presented it to the ' Academy of Antient Musick'
in London, on his election as Honorary President
for. life, in 1 724. (4) Clari wrote another beau
tiful one, which is among the Fitzwilliam MSS.
at Cambridge. (5) A nearly contemporary work,
by Astorga, is one of the best Italian productions
of its period.1 (6) Winter's Stabat Mater may be
taken as a happy example of his refined and grace
ful style ; and, if not a great work, is at least
a remarkably pleasing one. (7, 8, 9, 10) The
Eoyal College of Music possesses a Stabat Mater
a 3 by Pietro Raimondi ; with one composed
by Padre Vito, in 1783, and two others, by
Gesualdo Lanza, and the Spanish Composer,
Angelo Inzenga. (u) The Chevalier Neukomm
also wrote one which was very popular among
bis disciples. (12) Very different from all these
is the setting of the text which has made its
words familiar to thousands, if not millions, who
would never otherwise have heard of them.
We do not pause to enquire whether the sensuous
beauty of Rossini's ' Stabat Mater ' is worthy of
the subject, or not : but we do say, of critics
who judge it harshly, and dilettanti who can
listen to it unmoved, that they must either be
casehardened by pedantry, or destitute of all 'ear
for Music.' (13) Yet, even this does not repre
sent the latest interpretation of these beautiful
verses, which have been illustrated, in still more
modern, and very different musical phraseology,
by Dvorak.2 [W.S.R.]
STACCATO (Ital. ; Ger. abgestosseri), 'de
tached,' in contradistinction to legato, 'connected.'
The notes of a staccato passage are made short,
and separated from each other by intervals of
silence. Staccato effects are obtained on the
pianoforte by raising the hand from the keys
immediately after striking, usually by a rapid
action of the wrist (this is called ' wrist-touch '),
though sometimes, especially in fortissimo, from
the elbow ; and there is also a third kind of
staccato-touch called 'finger-staccato,' which is
less frequently used, and which, as described by
Hummel, consists in 'hurrying the fingers away
from the keys, very lightly and in an inward
direction.' This kind of touch is of course only
applicable to passages of single notes.
On stringed instruments staccato passages are
generally bowed with a separate stroke to each
note, but an admirable staccato can also be pro
duced, especially in solo music, by means of a
series of rapid jerks from the wrist, the bow
travelling meanwhile in one direction, from the
point to the nut. [See also PAGANINI, vol. ii.
p. 632.] Staccato on wind instruments is ef
fected by a rapid thrusting forward of the tongue,
so as to stop the current of air ; and in singing, a
staccato sound is produced by an impulse from
1 Published in score by Breitkopf & HSrtel (1879).
2 'Stabat Mater fur Soli, Chor, u. Orchester' (Simrock, 1881). Per
formed by the London Musical Society, March 1883.
STABLER.
685
the throat upon an open vowel, and instantly
checked. A striking example of vocal staccato
occurs in Mozart's air, 'Gli angui d'inferno,'
from 'Die Zauberflote.' Upon the harp, or any
similar instrument, and likewise upon the drum,
a staccato note requires the immediate application
of the palm of the hand to the vibrating string or
parchment, to stop the sound.
The signs of staccato are pointed dashes ' T ' ',
or round dots • • • •, placed over or under the
notes, the former indicating a much shorter and
sharper sound than the latter. [See DASH, vol. i.
p. 431.] But besides the difference thus shown,
the actual duration of staccato notes depends to
some extent upon their written length. Thus
in the following example the minims must be
played longer than the crotchets (though no
exact proportion need be observed), in spite of
the fact that both are marked staccato alike : —
BEETHOVEN, Sonata Path^tique.
When duts placed over or under notes are
covered by a curved line, an effect is intended
which is of great value in the rendering of
expressive and cantabile phrases. This is called
mezzo staccato (half-detached), and the notes
are sustained for nearly their full value, and
separated by a scarcely appreciable interval.
On stringed and wind instruments indeed they
are frequently not separated at all, but are
attacked with a certain slight emphasis which is
instantly weakened again, so as to produce almost
the effect of disconnection ; on the pianoforte
however they must of necessity be separated,
though but for an instant, and they are played
with a close firm pressure, and with but little
percussion. The following is an example of the
use of mezzo staccato, with its rendering, as nearly
as it is possible to represent it in notes : —
BEETHOVEN, Sonata in C, Op. 53.
Written.
sfsf
When a movement is intended to be staccato
throughout, or nearly so, the word is usually
written at the commencement, with the tempo-
indication. Thus Mendelssohn's Prelude in B
minor, op. 35, no. 3, is marked 'Prestissimo Stac
cato,' and Handel's Chorus, 'Let us break their
bonds asunder,' is 'Allegro e staccato.' [F. T.]
STADLER, ALBERT, intimate friend of Schu
bert's, born at Steyer in Upper Austria, April 4,
686
STABLER.
1794, learned music from F. Weigl and Wawra.
From 1812 to 1817 he studied law at the Uni
versity of Vienna, and was also at the Imperial
Convict, where he formed a close friendship with
Schubert. [See vol. iii. p. 321 &.] In 1817 he
became a government official in his native town,
where he was frequently visited by Schubert
and Vogl. Music was a constant occupation at
their common lodgings, and at houses where the
three were intimate, and they made excursions in
the neighbourhood. [See vol. iii. p. 331 5.] In
1821 Stadler moved to Linz, where he became
secretary, and in 1833 honorary member, of the
Musikverein. After a residence at Salzburg as
commissary of the district he retired with the
title of Statthaltereirath and the Imperial order
of Franz- Joseph. At Salzburg he was made an
honorary member of the Cathedral Musikverein,
and of the Mozarteum. Stadler was an in
dustrious composer, but only part of his Lieder
have been engraved. They include settings of
poems by Pichtler, Leitner, Kaltenbrunner,
Heine, Eurich, Korner, and Pannasch. [C.F.P.]
STABLER, MAXIMILIAN, ABBOT, a sound
and solid composer, born August 4, 1748, at
Melk, in Lower Austria. At ten became a
chorister in the monastery of Lilienfeld, where
he learnt music, completing his education in the
Jesuit College at Vienna. In 1 766 he joined
the Benedictines at Melk, and after taking
priest's orders worked as a parish-priest and
professor till 1786, when the Emperor Joseph,
who had noticed his organ-playing, made him
abbot first of Lilienfeld, and three years later of
Kremsmimster. Here his prudence averted the
suppression of that then famous astronomical
observatory. After this he lived at various
country houses, then privately at Linz, and
finally settled in Vienna. Haydn and Mozart
had been old friends of his, and at the request
of the widow he put Mozart's musical remains
in order, and copied from the autograph score
of the 'Requiem,' the Requiem and Kyrie, and
the Bies irae, both copy and original being now
in the Hofbibliothek at Vienna. [See vol. ii.
p. 402 a.~] He also came forward in defence of
the Requiem against Gottfried Weber, in two
pamphlets — ' Vertheidigung der Echtheit des
Mozart'schen Requiem' (Vienna 1826), and
' Nachtrag zur Vertheidigung,' etc. (Ib. 1827).
Stadler was an excellent contrapuntist, and
an authority in musical literature and history.
His printed compositions include, Sonatas and
fugues for PF. and organ ; part-songs ; two re
quiems; several masses; a Te Beum ; 'Bie
Fruhlingsfeier,' cantata, with orchestra, to Klop-
stock's words ; psalms, misereres, response?,
offertories, etc. ; also a response to Haydn's
farewell-card for two voices and PF. [See
vol. i. p. 715.] Among his numerous MSS. are
fine choruses for Collin's tragedy, 'Polyxena.'
Stadler's greatest work, 'Bie Befreiung von
Jerusalem,' an oratorio in two parts, words by
Heinrich and Matthaus von Collin, was given
with great success in 1816 at the annual extra
concert of the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde,
STAINER.
for the benefit of the proposed Conservatorium,
and in 1829 at Zurich.
Stadler died in Vienna Nov. 8, 1833, highly
esteemed both as man and musician. [C.F.P.J
STAFFORB, WILLIAM COOKE, a native of
York, published at Edinburgh in 1830 a I2mo.
volume entitled 'A History of Music,' a work
chiefly noted for its inaccuracy, but which
notwithstanding was translated into French
(i2mo. Paris, 1832) and German (Svo. Weimar,
1835). [W.H.H.]
STAGGINS, NICHOLAS, was taught music by
his father, a musician of little standing. Although
of slender ability he won the favour of Charles II,
who, in 1682, appointed him Master of the King's
Band of Music ; and in the same year the Univer
sity of Cambridge, upon the King's request, con
ferred upon him the degree of Mus. L)oc. The
performance of the customary exercise being dis
pensed with, great dissatisfaction was occasioned,
to allay which Staggins, in July 1684, performed
an exercise, whereupon he was appointed Professor
of Music in the University, being the first who
held that office. Staggins composed the Odes for
William Ill's birthday in 1693 and 1694, and for
Queen Anne's birthday, 1705. Songs by him are
contained in ' Choice Ayres, Songs and Bialogues,'
1675, and other collections of the time, and a
dialogue, ' How unhappy a lover am I,' composed
for Bry den's 'Conquest of Granada,' Part II, is
included in J. S. Smith's 'Musica Antiqua.' He
died in 1 705. [W.H.H.]
STAINER, JACOB, a celebrated German vio
lin-maker, born at Absam, a village near Hall,
about one German mile from Innsbruck, July 14,
1621 ; died 1683. According to one story, the boy
had a love of music, which induced the parish
priest to send him to an organ-builder at Inns
bruck. This trade, however, he found too laborious.
He therefore took to making stringed instruments,
serving his apprenticeship to an Innsbruck ' Lau-
tenmacher ' ; after which he proceeded to travel,
after the usual fashion of German apprentices.
In the course of his travels, according to the
story, he visited and worked at Cremona and
other places in Italy ; and the common story
is that he worked under Antonius or Nicholas
Amati, and afterwards spent some time at Venice,
where he wrought in the shop of Vimercati. Of
all this, however, there is not a particle of evi
dence. It may be said that violins are in existence,
signed by Stainer and dated from Cremona : but
these are now believed to be spurious. Probably
he found Italian violins in use among the Italian
musicians at the court of the Archduke Ferdinand
Charles, Count of the Tyrol, at Innsbruck, and
after examining their construction and contrast
ing them with the rude workmanship of the
ordinary German Lautenmacher, conceived the
idea of making violins on Italian principles. He
began at a very early age, if we may trust an
apparently genuine label dated 1641. His repu
tation was very quickly made, for in 1643, ac
cording to the ' J ahres-Bericht des Museums in
Salzburg1 for 1858, he sold a 'Viola Bastarda* to
STAINER.
the Archbishop of Salzburg for 30 florins. It is,
however, possible that there maybe a mistake as
to this date. He married in 1645 Margaret Holz-
hammer, by whom he had eight daughters, and
one son, who died in infancy. Henceforward to
his death, in 1683, the life of Stainer shows little
variety. He made a great number of stringed
instruments of all sorts, which he chiefly sold at
the markets and fairs of the neighbouring town
of Hall. The forests of ' Haselfichte' [see KLOTZ],
which clothe the slopes of the Lafatsch and the
Gleirsch, supplied him with the finest material
in the world for his purpose ; and tradition says
that Stainer would walk through the forest carry
ing a sledge-hammer, with which he struck the
stems of the trees to test their resonance ; and
at the falling of timber on the mountain-slopes,
Stainer would station himself at some spot where
he could hear the note yielded by the tree as it
rebounded from the mountain side. In 1648 the
Archduke Ferdinand Charles paid a visit to Hall,
in the course of which Stainer exhibited and
played upon his fiddles, and the Archduke thence
forth to his death in 1662 became his constant
patron. Ten years later he received by diploma
the title of Hof-geigenmacher to the Archduke,
and in 1669 (Jan. 9) the office was renewed to
him by a fresh diploma on the lapse of the county
of Tyrol to the Emperor Leopold I. Stainer seems
to have been always in embarrassed circum
stances, owing partly to his dealings with Solo
mon Hiibmer, a Jew of Kirchdorf, with whom
he was constantly at law. In 1669, having fallen
under a suspicion of Lutheranism, he was im
prisoned and forced to recant. In 1672 he sold
a viola da gamba and two tenor viols at Salzburg
for 72 florins, and in 1675 at the same place a
violin for 22 fl. 4 kr. He was still at work in
1677, in which year he made two fine instru
ments for the monastery of St. Georgenburg.
Soon after this date he ceased from his labours.
In the same year he presented an ineffectual
petition to the Emperor for pecuniary assistance.
In his latter years Stainer became of unsound
mind, in which condition he died in 1683, leaving
Ms wife and several daughters surviving him :
and in 1684 his house was sold by his creditors,
his family having disclaimed his property on
account of the debts with which it was burdened.
His wife died in great poverty in 1689. There
is therefore no truth whatever in the story of
his retirement after the death of his wife to a
Benedictine monastery, where he is said to have
devoted himself to the manufacture of a certain
number of violins of surpassing excellence, which
he presented to the Electors and the Emperor.
Stainer undoubtedly made violins, probably of
special excellence, for the orchestras of some of
the Electors ; but such instruments were made
and sold in the ordinary way of trade. In course
of time, when one of his best-finished instru
ments turned up, the contrast between it and
the crowd of common ones which bore his name
caused it to be looked on as one of these ' Elector
Violins.' These violins, however, cannot have been
the work of his last years, during which he was
STAINER.
687
insane, and had to be confined in his house at
Absam, where the wooden bench to which he
was chained is still to be seen.
Stainer's place in the history of German fiddle-
making is strongly marked, and it accounts for
his fame and his substantial success. He was
the first to introduce into Germany those Italian
principles of construction which are the secret
of sonority. The degree of originality with which
Stainer is to be credited cannot be precisely de
termined. Some trace his model to the early
Tyrolese viol-makers, but in the opinion of other
authorities the peculiarities of the Stainer violins
are strictly original. As a mere workman Stainer
is entitled to the highest rank, and if he had but
chosen a better model, his best instruments would
have equalled those of Stradivarius himself. Like
that celebrated maker he was famous for the great
number as well as the excellence of his produc
tions. He made an immense number of instru
ments, some more, and others less, finely finished,
but all substantially of the same model : and
the celebrity which he gained caused his pattern
to be widely copied, in Germany, in England [see
LONDON VIOLIN-MAKERS], and even in Italy, at
a time when Stradivarius and Joseph Guarnerius
were producing instruments in all respects enor
mously superior. This endured more or less for
a century ; but the fashion passed away, and his
imitators took to imitating those Italian makers
whose constructive principles he had adopted.
All Stainer's works bear his peculiar impress. The
main design bears a rough resemblance to that
of the Amati, but the model is higher; the
belly, instead of forming a finely-rounded ridge,
is flattened at the top, and declines abruptly to
the margins ; the middle curves are shallow and
ungraceful ; the /-holes are shorter, and have a
square and somewhat mechanical cut; the top
and bottom volutes of the /'s are rounder and
more nearly of a size than in the Cremona instru
ments, but the wood is of the finest quality, the
finish, though varying in the different classes
of instruments, invariably indicates a rapid and
masterly hand ; and the varnish is always rich
and lustrous. It is of all colours, from a deep
thick brown to a fine golden amber, equal to that
of Cremona : and in his best works the exterior
alone would justify the celebrity of the maker.
But to understand the secret of Stainer's success
the violin must be opened, and it then appears
that the thicknesses of the wood and the dispo
sition of the blocks and linings are identical with
those of the Cremona makers. The difference will
become more obvious when an old German viol is
examined. It will be found that the older German
makers, though they finished their instruments
with great care and sometimes with laborious
ornament, settled their dimensions and thick
nesses by guess, and used no linings at all.
Stainer's instruments are poor in respect of tone.
The combination of height and flatness in the
model diminishes the intensity of the tone, though
it produces a certain sweetness and flexibility.
Popular as the model once was, the verdict of
musicians is now unanimous against it, and the
638
STAINER.
Stainer instruments are now valued less for prac
tical use than as curiosities. The violins, which
are found of three different sizes, are the best
worth having ; the tenors are good for little.
The violins are abundant enough, even after
allowing for the vast number of spurious instru
ments which pass under the maker's name ; but
they vary greatly in value, according to their
class, and the condition in which they are. Their
value has greatly decreased during the present
century. . A fine specimen that would have
brought £100 a century ago will now scarcely
produce £20, and the inferior instruments have
depreciated in proportion. Small instruments of
the common sort, which may be bought very
cheap, are useful for children. Stainer' s best
instruments have written labels : some of the
common ones have in very small Roman letter
press in the middle of a large slip of paper,
'Jacobus Stainer in Absom prope Oenipontum
Anno (1678).' It is not impossible that some
of these may have been made by other hands
under his direction. [E.J.P.]
STAINER, MARCUS, brother of the last-
mentioned, a celebrated Tyrolese violin-maker.
Mark Stainer learned his trade from Jacob, and
set up for himself at the village of Laufen. The
famous Florentine player Veracini had two violins
by this maker, christened ' St. Peter' and ' St.
Paul,' and he reckoned them superior to all Italian
violins. In sailing from London to Leghorn in
1746 Veracini was shipwrecked and the fiddles
were lost. The instruments of this maker are
extremely rare. They are made of unusually fine
material, covered with dark varnish, of somewhat
large size, and are sweet though decidedly feeble
in tone. Like those of Jacob Stainer, they usually
contain written labels. One of these runs thus :
' Marcus Stainer, Burger und Geigenmacher in
Kiifstein anno 1659.' Occasionally Marcus Stainer
yielded to an obvious temptation, and sold his
violins under the name of his more famous
brother.' [E.J.P.]
STAINER, JOHN, Mus. Doc., son of a school
master, was born in London, June 6, 1840, entered
the choir of St. Paul's Cathedral in 1847 — by
which time he was already a remarkable player
and an excellent sight-singer — and remained there
till 1856, very often taking the organ on occasion.
In 1854 ne was appointed organist and choir
master of St. Benedict and St. Peter, Paul's Wharf,
of which the Rev. J. H. Coward, classical master
to the choristers, was Rector. At the same time
he learnt harmony from Mr. Bayley, master of St.
Paul's boys, and counterpoint from Dr. Steggall,
for whom he sang the soprano part in his Mus.
Doc. exercise at Cambridge in 1852. Through the
liberality of Miss Hackett he received a course
of lessons on the organ from George Cooper at
St. Sepulchre's. In 1856 he was selected by
Sir P. Ousel ey as organist of his then newly-
founded college at Tenbury, where he remained
for some time. In 1859 ne matriculated at
Christ Church, Oxford, and took the degree of
Mus. Bac. Shortly after, he left Tenbury for
STAINER.
Magdalen College, Oxford, where after six months
trial he succeeded Mr. Blyth as organist and
informator choristarum. He then entered St.
Edmund Hall as a resident undergraduate, and
while discharging his duties at Magdalen, worked
for his B.A. degree in Arts, which he took in
Trinity Term, 1863. Meantime, on the death
of Stephen Elvey, he had been appointed organist
of the University of Oxford, and was conductor
of a flourishing College Musical Society and of
another association at Exeter College. But
nothing interfered with his duties at Magdalen,
where he raised the choir to a very high state of
efficiency. In 1 865 he proceeded to his Mus. Doc.
degree, and in 1866 to his M.A., and became one
of the examiners for musical degrees. In 1872 he
left Oxford and succeeded Mr. Goss (afterwards
Sir John) as organist of St. Paul's Cathedral.
The services were at that time by no means what
they should have been ; but Stainer possessed the
confidence of the Dean and Chapter, and his hard
work, knowledge, and tact, have at last brought
them to the pitch of excellence which is now so
well known in London.
Dr. Stainer has not confined his activity to his
own University. He is a member of the board
of musical studies at Cambridge, and for two
years was also examiner for the degree of Mus.
Doc. there. He is further examiner for musical
degrees in the University of London ; is an
Hon. Member of the Royal Academy of Music,
and Hon. Fellow of the Tonic Sol-fa College ; a
Vice- President of the College of Organists, and
a Vice-President of the Musical Association, of
which he was virtually the founder. He was a
juror at the Paris Exhibition of 1880, and at its
close was decorated with the Legion of Honour.
He was attached to the National Training School,
London, as a Professor of Organ and Harmony,
from its foundation, and at Easter 1881 succeeded
Mr. Sullivan as Principal. In 1882 he suc
ceeded Mr. Hullah as Inspector of Music in the
Elementary Schools of England for the Privy
Council. He is also a Member of Council of
the Royal College of Music. His compositions
embrace an oratorio, ' Gideon,' and a cantata,
' The Daughter of Jairus,' composed by request
for the Worcester Festival of September 1878,
two complete cathedral services, and 16 anthems.
He is the author of the two very popular manuals
of Harmony and the Organ in Novello's series,
and of a work on Bible music, and is part editor,
with W. A. Barrett, of a ' Dictionary of Musical
Terms' (Novello, 1876). Dr. Stainer is beloved
and esteemed by all who know him, and is an
admirable and efficient musician in all branches,
but his great excellence resides in his organ-play
ing, and especially his accompaniments, which are
unsurpassed. He is a shining example of the
excellent foundation of sound musical knowledge
which may be got out of the various duties and
shifts of the life of a clever chorister in one of our
cathedrals ; and by which both he and his friend
Arthur Sullivan benefited, as they perhaps could
not have benefited by any more regular course
of study. [G.]
STAMATY.
STAMATY, CAMILLE MARIE, son of a Greek
father and a very musical French mother, was
born at Rome, March 23, 1811. After the death
of his father in 1818 his mother returned to
France, remained some time at Dijon, and finally
went, to Paris. There, after long coquetting
between music and business as a profession,
Stamaty, in 1828, took an employe's post in the
Prefecture of the Seine. But music retained its
influence on him, and under Fessy and Kalk-
brenner he became a remarkable player. An
attack of rheumatism forced him from playing
to the study of composition. In March 1835 he
made his first public appearance in a concert,
the programme of which contained a concerto
and other pieces of his composition. This led to
his being- much sought after as a teacher. But
he was not satisfied, and in Sept. 1836 went to
Leipzig, attracted doubtless by the fame of Men
delssohn and Schumann, then both resident there
(Mendelssohn Family, ii. 20). After a short
course of instruction from Mendelssohn, he re
turned to Paris early in 1837, and introduced
much more classical music — Bach, Mozart, Bee
thoven, etc. — into his programmes. In 1846 he
lost his mother, in 1848 he married, in 1862 was
made Chevalier of the Legion of Honour, and on
April 19, 1870, closed a long career of usefulness
and enthusiasm. From a crowd of pupils it is
sufficient to name Gottschalk and Saint Saens.
His most permanent works are educational — ' Le
Khythme des doigts,' much praised ; ' Etudes
progressives' (op. 37-39); 'Etudes concertantes '
(ops. 46, 47) ; 'Esquisse' (op. 19); 'Etudes pit-
toresques' (op. 21) ; 'Six dtudes caracteristiqiies
sur Obe'ron,' and 12 transcriptions entitled 'Sou
venir du Conservatoire.'
Besides these, his solo sonatas in F minor and
C minor, a PF. trio (op. 12), a concerto in A
minor, and other works, were much esteemed at
the time. The concerto and some brilliant vari
ations on an original theme (op. 3), are reviewed
very favourably by Schumann (Ges. Schriften,
ii. 155, 181). [G.]
STAMITZ. A Bohemian musical family of
much renown in the iSth century, (i) JOHANN
KARL, born 1719, son of the schoolmaster at
Deutscbbrod ; a man evidently of great originality
and force. About 1745 he became leading violin
and director of chamber-music to the Elector of
Mannheim, and remained there till his death in
1761. He wrote much music for the violin,
which shows him to have been a great and
brilliant player. Six concertos, 3 sets of 6
sonatas, and some solo exercises, giving the effect
of duets, were published at Paris, and 21 con
certos and 9 solos are still in MS. He also
wrote symphonies, of which 6 are published and
ii in MS., as well as concertos and sonatas for
the harpsichord. There is no chance now of
hearing any of Stamitz's orchestral works ; but
it is obvious from Burney's account ('Present
State,' i. 95, 96) that they were a great advance
in effect and expression on anything that pre
ceded them. (2) His brother THADD^US, born
1721, was a great cello-player, also in the
VOL. III. PT. 6.
STANFORD.
6S9
Mannheim band. He became a priest, rose to
many dignities, and died at Altbunzlau Aug. 23,
1768. Another brother, JOSEPH, was distin
guished as a painter. Cannabich was one of Johann
Karl's pupils, but a still more remarkable one
was (3) his eldest son, KARL, born at Mannheim,
May 7, 1746, and like his father a remarkable
violinist and composer. In 17/0 he went to
Paris, and was known there as a player, of the
viola and viola d'amore. In 1785 he returned
to Germany, and in 1787 we find him at Prague
and Nuremberg, in 1790 at Cassel, and then at
St. Petersburg, where he remained for some years,
and where he brought out a grand opera, ' Dar-
danus.' He died at Jena in 1 80 1. His published
works contain 10 svmphonies, 4 do. for 2 violins
and orchestra, 7 concertos for violin, I for viola,
and i for piano; also many quartets, trios, etc.
(4) Another son of Johann Karl was ANTON, born
at Mannheim 1755. He went to Paris with
Karl, and published much for the violin, of which
a list is given by Fe'tis. [G.]
STANFORD, CHARLES VILLIERS, composer
and conductor, born Sept. 30, 1852, at Dublin,
where his father, an enthusiastic amateur, was
Examiner in the Court of Chancery. He studied
composition with A. O'Leary and Sir Robert
Stewart ; matriculated at Queen's College, Cam
bridge, as choral scholar; in 1873 succeeded Dr.
J. L. Hopkins as organist of Trinity College, gra
duated there in Classical Honours in 1874, and
was appointed conductor of the Cambridge Univer
sity Musical Society. In 1874, 5, and 6, he studied
with Reinecke at Leipzig, and Kiel at Berlin ;
proceeded M.A. in 1877 ; wrote an Overture for
the Gloucester Festival in the same year, which
was afterwards played at the Crystal Palace, and
a Psalm (the 46th, op. 8), performed at Cambridge,
May 22, 1877, and a^ a Richter Concert. At the
request of Mr. Tennyson he composed the overture,
songs, and entractes for ' Queen Mary ' (op. 6),
when that play was produced at the Lyceum,
April 1 8, 1876. His Symphony in Bb was per
formed at the Crystal Palace, March S, 1879.
On Feb. 6, 1881, his opera 'The Veiled Pro
phet of Khorassan,' in 3 acts, libretto by W. B.
Squire, after Moore, was produced at the Court
Theatre, Hanover, with German version by
Kapellmeister Frank, published by Boosey & Co.
and Bote & Bock. An Elegiac Symphony in D
minor was produced at Cambridge, March 7,
1882; and a Serenade in 5 movements, also for
full orchestra (op. i 7), at the Birmingham Fes
tival, 1882, with great success, and repeated
at Bristol. Thus far every year has scored a
success, and we may hope that a new 3-act
opera, ' Savonarola ' — words by G. A. A'Beckett
—announced for production at Hamburg in the
autumn, will not prove an exception. In chamber
music Mr. Stanford has been equally active. He
has published a Suite and Toccata for PF. solo
(ops. 2 and 3); a Sonata for Pb\ and violin in D
(op. ii), and another for PF. and cello in A
(op. 9) — both produced at Franke's Chamber
Concerts, 1882 ; 3 Intermezzos for PF. and
clarinet (op. 13); a String Quartet in F (op.
690
STANFORD.
STARK.
15) ; 8 Songs by George Eliot (op. i) ; 6 do.
by Heine (op. 4) ; 6 do. by do. (op. 7) ; 6 Songs
(op. 14). In church music he is known by a
Morning, Communion, and Evening Service in Bb
(op. 10), and an Evening do. (Sons of the Clergy,
1880) for chorus, orchestra, and organ (op. 12);
also 2 hymns by Klopstock (ops. 5 and 16). He
has edited Leo's 'Dixit Dominus' inC, and in his
capacity of conductor of the Cambridge University
Musical Society, has given first performances in
England of Schumann's 3rd part of 'Faust,'
Brahms's C minor Symphony and Rhapsodie
(op. 53), Kiel's Requiem, etc. Under Mr. Stan
ford the society just mentioned has become a
power in the country, and his influence has
stimulated music at Cambridge to a remarkable
degree of activity, which has yet to be imitated
at Oxford. He is Professor of Composition and
Orchestral playing at the Royal College of Music,
London. [G.]
STANLEY, JOHN, Mus. Bac., born in London
in 1713, at two years old became blind by ac
cident, at seven began to learn music from John
Reading, organist of Hackney, and a few months
later was placed with Maurice Greene, under
whom he made such rapid progress that in 1724
he was appointed organist of All Hallows, Bread
Street, and in 1 726 organist of St. Andrew's, Hoi-
born. On July 19, 1729, he graduated as Mus.
Bac. at Oxford. In 1734 he was appointed one of
the organists of the Temple Church. In 1 742 he
published ' Six Cantatas, for a Voice and Instru
ments,' the words by Hawkins, the future historian
of music, which proved so successful that a few
months later he published a similar set to words
by the same author. In 1757 he produced his
' Jephthah,' and in 1760 joined J. C. Smith in
carrying on the oratorio performances formerly
conducted by Handel, for which he composed
'Zimri,' 1760, and 'The Fall of Egypt,1 1774.
In 1761 he set to music Robert Lloyd's dramatic
pastoral, 'Arcadia, or The Shepherd's Wedding,'
written in honour of the marriage of George III.
and Queen Charlotte. He published also ' Three
Cantatas and Three Songs for a Voice and In
struments,' and three sets, of 12 each, of Organ
Voluntaries. In 1774, on the retirement of Smith,
he associated Thomas Linley with himself in the
conduct of the oratorios. In 1779 he succeeded
Dr. Boyce as Master of the King's Band of
Music. Burney says he was ' a neat, pleasing,
and accurate performer, a natural and agreeable
composer, and an intelligent instructor.' He died
May 19, 1786. His portrait by Gainsborough
was finely engraved by Mary Ann Rigg (after
wards Scott), and another portrait, at the organ,
was engraved by Mac Ardell. [W.H.H.]
STANSBURY, GEORGE FREDERICK, son of
Joseph Stansbury, a player upon the flute, bassoon
and viola, residing in Bristol, was born in that
city in 1800. When only 12 years old he was
proficient on the pianoforte, violin, and flute, and
at 19 was engaged by Mine. Catalani as accom
pany ist during a concert tour through England.
He was afterwards director of the music at the
Theatre Royal, Dublin, where he made his ap
pearance as a composer with an overture to ' Life
in Dublin.' In 1828 he appeared at the Hay-
market Theatre as Capt. Macheath in 'The
Beggar's Opera,' and on Jan. 15, 1829, at Covent
Garden in A. Lee's 'Nymph of the Grotto.' He
continued there and at Drury Lane for several
years. He was afterwards engaged as musical
director and conductor at the St. James's, the
Surrey, and other theatres. He composed music
for ' Waverley ' (with A. Lee), and ' Puss in
Boots,' 1832 ; 'The Elfin Sprite,' and 'Neuha's
Cave,' 1833, and other pieces, besides many
songs, etc. His voice was of poor quality, but he
was an excellent musician, and a ready composer.
He died of dropsy, June 3, 1845. * [W.H.H.]
STARCK (von Bronsart), INGEBORG, was born
at St. Petersburg, of Swedish parents, 12-24
August, 1840. Henselt was one of her first
masters. When 18 she studied for some time
under Liszt at Weimar, and then made a long
concert tour through the principal towns of Ger
many, playing at the Gewandhaus Concerts in
1858 and 1859, at Paris and St. Petersburg. In
1 86 1 she married Hans von Bronsart. After
staying some time in Leipzig, Dresden, and
Berlin, Herr Bronsart and his wife settled in
Hanover, where he is Intendant of the theatre.
Here she devoted herself entirely to composition.
An opera by her, 'Die Gottin von Sais,' had
been unsuccessful in Berlin, but her next dra
matic work, a setting of Goethe's 'Jery und
Bately,' was played with great success in Weimar,
Cassel, and many other places. In 1870 she
wrote a ' Kaiser Wilhelm March,' which was
played at Berlin at a state performance to cele
brate the return of the troops. She has since
completed a four-act opera ' Kb'nig Hiarne,' the
libretto by Hans von Bronsart and Friedrich
von Bodenstedt. Since settling in Hanover, Frau
von Bronsart, who is a pianist of rare excellence,
has seldom been heard in public. She has how
ever played duets for two pianos with Liszt at
concerts in Hanover. Her compositions, include
a concerto and other PF. pieces, many songs,
and some music for strings. [W.B.S.]
STARK, LUDWIG, was born at Munich June
19, 1831; was educated at the University there,
and learned music in the good school of the
Lachners. In 1856 he went to Paris, and after
a short residence there removed to StuttgJirt,
and in conjunction with Lebert, Brachmann,
and Laiblin, founded the Stuttgart Music School,
which has since become so well known. Among
the teachers in the school were Speidel, Faisst,
Pischek, Levi, and other well-known names. Dr.
Stark's energies have been since that time con
tinually concentrated on the school, which has
flourished accordingly, and in July 1865 was
allowed to assume the title of Conservatorium.
Among the present teachers are Dionys Pruckner
(piano), Edmund Singer (violin), etc. At the
end of the 5Oth half-year, April 15, 1882, the
number of professional scholars was 140 (12
English), 44 male and 96 female. But in 1878
STARK.
the number appears to have reached 222. More
than 5000 pupils have been educated in the
Conservatorium, of whom 540 were from Great
Britain and 436 from America.
A large number of works have been prepared
for the use of the students, among which the
'Grosse Klavierschule' of Leberfc and Stark, in
4 vols., is conspicuous. Also by the same — ' In-
struktive Klavierstucke' in 4 grades; ' Jugend-
bibliothek ' and ' Jugendalbum/ each in 1 2 parts ;
' Instruktive klassicher Ausgabe,' of various
writers, in 21 vols., by Lebert, Faisst, I. Lach-
ner, Liszt, and Biilow ; and many more.
Dr. Stark was made Royal Professor in 1868,
and Hon. Dr. Ph. 1 8 73, and has many other distinc
tions. His latest publication is op. 7 7, part-songs.
SIGMUND LEBERT, the real founder of the Stutt
gart Conservatoire, was born at Ludwigsburg, in
Wurtemberg, Dec. 12, 1822, and got his musical
education from Tomaschek and D. Weber at
Prague. He settled in Munich as a pianoforte
teacher for some years before he started the
music school. He is a very accomplished and
successful teacher, though the merit of his sys
tem — the percussive one, which often leads to
thumping — may be questioned. [G.]
STAUDENHEIM, JACOB RITTEB VON— who
was Beethoven's medical man during his last years
— born at Mainz 1764, died at Vienna, May 17,
1830, was one of the most distinguished physicians
of his time. He studied in Paris, Augsburg, and
Vienna, where, after two years practice in Hun
gary, he settled. He early gained the favour of
the Harrach family, which introduced him to an
extensive practice among the highest ranks of
the Austrian nobility. In 1826 he treated the Em
peror Franz so successfully, as to be appointed
physician to the Duke of Reichstadt, son of
Napoleon and Marie Louise. [A.W.T.]
STATJDIGL, JOSEPH, one of the most dis
tinguished and accomplished singers of modern
times, born April 14, 1807, at Wb'llersdorf, in
Lower Austria. His father destined him for
his own calling, that of Imperial huntsman
(Revierjager), but for this he was not sufficiently
strong, and in 1816 he entered the Gymnasium
of Wiener Neustadt, where his beautiful soprano
voice soon attracted attention in the church. In
1823 he attended the philosophical college at
Krems, and was persuaded, in 1825, to enter
upon his noviciate in the Benedictine Monastery
at Melk. Here his voice, which had developed
into a fine sonorous bass, was invaluable for the
church services. A vague impulse drove him
in Sept. 1827 to Vienna to study surgery, but
money ran short, and he was glad to accept a
place in the chorus at the Karnthnerthor Theatre.
Here he took occasional secondary parts, until
the sudden illness of one of the solo singers
brought him forward as Pietro in the ' Stumme
von Portici,' after which all the principal parts
fell into his hands. High as was his position
on the stage, he was still greater as a singer
of oratorio and church music. For this branch
of music he had not only an inborn love, but
STAVE.
691
great natural gifts, especially quickness of
comprehension, and an extraordinary power of
singing at sight. In 1831 he was admitted to
the Court Chapel, and in 1837 sang for the first
time at the great musical festival of the Gesell-
schaft der Musikfreunde in the ' Creation.' In
1833 he sang in the 'Seasons' for the Ton-
kiinstler Soc'etat, a society to which he ren
dered the greatest services. Though not even a
member, he sang at no less than eighty of its
concerts, and absolutely declined to accept any
fee. Differences with the management of the
Court Theatre led him to the theatre ' An der
Wien' on its reopening in 1845. There he
acted as chief manager, and, with Pischek and
Jenny Lind, entered on a series of fresh
triumphs. He returned to the Court Theatre
in 1848, but only to expose himself to fresh
annoyance up to February 1854, when an
abrupt dismissal embittered the rest of his life.
His last appearance in public was in ' St. Paul,'
at the Tonkiinstler Societat, on Palm Sunday
1856. A few days after, insanity developed
itself, and he was taken to an asylum, which he
never quitted alive. His repeated tours abroad
spread his fame far and wide, and he had many
admirers in England, which he often visited, and
where he sang in English. He created the part
of ' Elijah ' at the Birmingham Festival of 1 846,
singing the music at sight at the grand re
hearsal. As a singer of Schubert's Lieder he
was without a rival; those who were happy
enough to have heard him sing the 'Erlkonig,'
the ' Wanderer,' ' Gruppe aus dem Tartarus,' or
' Aufenthalt,' will never forget it. It was most
touching to hear him giving the ' Wanderer '
in the asylum with all his old power, accom
panied on the pianoforte by a gifted young
musician named Vincenz Wagner, who has been
seventeen times in the institution, and is there
at the present moment. He died March 28,
1 86 1, and half Vienna followed him to the grave.
One of the pall-bearers was the first tenor, Aloys
Ander, then happily ignorant that death would
before long release him (Dec. II, 1864) fr°m a
similar sad fate. [See vol. i. p. 656.]
Staudigl was a man of varied gifts and ardent
temperament. Whatever he undertook he pur
sued passionately, whether it were hunting,
painting, chemistry, chess, or billiards ; he was
frank, open, and amiable; many a young com
poser owes his first introduction to the public
to Staudigl's interpretation of his songs.
His youngest son, JOSEPH, born March 1 8, 1 850,
possesses a flexible sonorous baryton, which he
cultivated with success under Herr Rokitansky
at the Vienna Conservatorium till 1874, when
he left. He has already made his mark as an
oratorio singer in the principal towns of Ger
many and Switzerland. Since 1875 he has been
engaged at the Court Theatre of Carlsruhe, and
has lately been appointed chamber-singer to the
Grand Duke. [C.F.P.]
STAVE (Lat. System a ; Ital. Sistema, Le
linee su cui si scrivon le note; Germ. Linien-
system, System; Fr. Portee; Eng. Stave,
Yy2
69-2
STAVE.
Staff). A series of horizontal lines, so arranged
that the signs used for the representation of
musical notes may be written upon, or between
them.
Though the etymology of the term cannot be
proved, its derivation from the familiar Saxon
root is too obvious to admit of doubt. Its use,
as applied to the verses of a Psalm, Canticle, or
Ditty of any kind, is very antient, and, as we
shall presently show, the music sung to such
verses was originally noted down in such close
connection with the verbal text that it may fairly
be said to form part of it. When a system of
lines and spaces was engrafted on the primitive
form of Notation, the old term was still re
tained ; and we now apply it to this, even more
familiarly than to the verse itself. The best
proof that this is the true derivation of the term
lies in the fact that Morley calls the Stave a Verse,
and describes the Verse as consisting of Rules 1
and Spaces. Dr. Callcott, and some few other
writers, call it a Staff: but, Stave and Staff are
both derived from the same primitive root, and
are similarly written — though not similarly pro
nounced — in the plural form.
These signs — first called Neumse, then Points,
and now Notes — were originally written above
the verbal text with which they were connected,
in positions which vaguely indicated the com
parative gravity or acuteness of the sounds they
represented, but not with sufficient clearness to
teach the Melody to Singers who had not pre
viously learned it by ear.2 Attempts were made,
from time to time, to distinguish the actual, as
well as the comparative pitch of the sounds indi
cated ; or, at least, to demonstrate the comparative
pitch with greater certainty. But, no radical im
provement was introduced, until about the year
900, when a single horizontal line was drawn
across the parchment, to serve as a guide to the
position of the Neumae written upon, above, or
below it.3 This line, the germ of our present
Stave, has exercised more direct influence upon
the Art of Notation than any other invention,
either of early or modern date. It was originally
drawn in red. All Neumse placed upon it were
understood to represent the note F. A Neuma
written immediately above it represented G ; one
immediately below it, E. The places of three
signs were, therefore, definitely fixed ; while those
written at greater distances above or below the
line, though less certain in their signification,
were at least more intelligible than they had been
under the previous system.
A yellow line was soon afterwards added, at a
little distance above the red one. Neumge written
on this line represented the note C ; and the posi
tion of a whole septenary of signs was thus fixed,
with tolerable clearness : for, signs placed exactly
half way between the two lines would naturally
represent A ; while the positions of D, and B,
above and below the yellow line, and G and F,
above and below the red one, were open to very
' ' Eules,' i. e. lines. Printers still employ the same term.
2 See the upper example on p. 468, vol. ii.
3 See the lower example on the same page.
STAVE.
little doubt, in carefully-written MSS. When
black lines were used, instead of coloured ones, the
letters F, and C, were written at the beginning
of their respective ' rules ' ; and because these
afforded a key to the Notation, they were called
Claves, or, as we now say, Clefs*
Early in the nth century, two more black
lines were added to the Stave : one, above the
yellow line ; and the other, between the yellow
and red ones. The upper black line then repre
sented E, and the lower one, A; and the
combined effect of the whole was, to produce
a four-lined Stave, exactly like that now used in
the Gregorian system of Notation. In fact,
when convenience suggested — as it very soon
did — the practice of changing the position of
the Clefs from one line to another, there re
mained but little to distinguish the Notation of
the 1 2th and I3th century from that now in
variably used for Plain Chaunt.
The invention of the two additional lines has
been ascribed to Guido d'Arezzo; but it seems
more probable that he was the first to mention
the improvements known in his day, than that
he himself first introduced them. We do not
possess sufficient evidence to set this question
at rest. A MS. Troparium, in the Bodleian
Library at Oxford, dating from the reign of King
Ethelred II (978-1016), contains examples of
mediaeval Notation, in which the position of the
Neumse is expressed both with, and without,
the assistance of the rudimentary Stave.5 In
the earlier pages of this MS. — extending as far
as fol. 131 — the Neumse are not even accom
panied by the single line : but, in the middle of
fol. 131 b, a four-lined Stave is introduced, with
Neumse written both on the lines, and in the
spaces between them.6 The date of the pages
written in simple Neumae is proved, beyond all
dispute, by a Litany containing the words (Ut
^Ethelredum regem et exercitum Anglorum con-
servare digneris.' 7 This point has never been
disputed ; and if we could assume the remainder
of the document to be of equal antiquity, as was
once thought, we should have evidence enough to
prove that the system based upon the combined
employment of lines and spaces was used, in
England, some considerable time before Guido
described it in Italy. But the four-lined Stave
in question proves on examination by the micro
scope,8 to be a mere modern substitution for the
original notation of the MS., which is in some
places still to be seen through the imperfect
erasures. The opinion expressed in the article
NOTATION (on the authority of the late Librarian
of the Bodleian) is therefore no longer tenable.
[See vol. ii. p. 470.]
The difficulty, however, is one of dates only.
Whenever or wherever it was first employed,
the four-lined Stave can only be regarded as the
natural development of the system, which, in its
* See the first example on p. 469 o, vol. ii.
5 Bodley MSS. 775.
6 A facsimile of the middle portion of fol. 131 b of the Ethelred MS.,
will be found in vcl. ii. p. 470.
7 Fol. 186.
8 The Editor is indebted for this to Professor Moseley, F.R.S., who
kindly made the examination at his request.
STAVE.
STEFFANI.
693
rudimentary form, used a single red line to de
termine the place of a single note. The employ
ment of the spaces between the lines springs from
the custom of writing Neumae above, or below, the
normal red line, as well as upon it. The advantage
of the system lies in the combination of these two
methods. Yet this advantage was not, at first,
very generally understood. Early in the I oth cen
tury, Hucbaldus invented a Stave consisting of an
indefinite number of lines, between which he wrote
the syllables he intended to be sung, without the
aid of Neumae, upon a principle which will be found
fully explained at page 469 of our second volume.
Here, then, was a Stave, of which the spaces
only were used, while the lines lay idle. Con
temporary with this — as nearly as can be ascer
tained — was another kind of Stave, also consist
ing of an indefinite number of lines, on which
the notes to be sung were indicated by points.
An example of this form, in which the spaces lay
idle, will also be found at page 469 b, vol. ii. But,
these collateral inventions soon fell into disuse.
The system of alternate lines and spaces was
adopted, to the exclusion of all others, in every
country in Europe. Henceforth, the only differ
ence lay in the number of lines employed. The
natural tendency, at first, was, to multiply them.
In early MSS. we constantly find Staves of six,
eight, twelve, fifteen, and even a still greater
number of lines, embracing a compass sufficient
for the transcription of an entire Vocal Score.1
After a time, the difficulty of reading so many
lines at once, led to the adoption of a more com
modious form, consisting of two groups, with four
black lines in each, separated by a single red
line. Staves of this kind are rare; but an ex
ample may be seen at fol. 201 a of the Chaucer
MS. in the British Museum.2 Finally, these
variable forms were relinquished, in favour of a
fixed standard, which, in the I5th and i6th cen
turies, admitted the use of four, five, or six lines
only. The Stave of four lines was used exclu
sively for Plain Chaunt, and is retained for that
purpose to the present day. That of six lines
was used for Organ Music, and Music for the
Virginals. That of five lines was used for all
Vocal Music, except Plain Chaunt ; and, after the
invention of printing, for Music of every kind.
It seems scarcely likely that the Stave of five
lines will ever be superseded ; or that that with
four lines will be discontinued for Plain Chaunt.
A private attempt made, some twenty years ago,
to revive the six-lined Stave, for the purpose of
reducing the F and G clefs to a common stan
dard, failed instantly. [W.S.E.]
STEFFANI, AGOSTINO. This very remark
able man was born in 1655 at Castel franco,
between Bassano and Treviso, six years after
Alessandro Scarlatti and three years before Pur-
cell. Of his parentage nothing is known. He
appears to have entered one of the Conservatorios
early, and become a singing boy at St. Mark's
in Venice, where in 1667 he was heard by a
Count Tattenbach, probably an emissary of the
J See vol. iii. p. 428.
2 Arundel MSS. 248.
Court of Bavaria. The Count was so delighted
with his voice and intelligence, that he carried him
off to Munich. He was educated at the expense
of the Elector Ferdinand Maria, as appears from
a decree3 of July 26, 1668, ordering a payment
of 150 florins to Count Tattenbach for the board
and lodging of the ' Welscher Musikus Augustin
Steffani ' during the previous year. By another de
cree of July 9, 1668, the young ' Churf iirstliche
Kammer- und Hofmusikus' had been already ap
prenticed to Johann Kaspar Kerl to learn to
play (schlagcn) the organ, and to be boarded, for
the yearly sum of 432 florins. A further entry
of the pay office shows that the yearly cost of
the Hof- and Kammermusikus was, for 1669,
903 fl. 12 kr. ; for 1670, 997 fl. He remained
with Kerl till Oct. I, 1671, from which day he
was boarded and lodged by the Churfiirstlichen
Kammerdiener Seyler for 1 56 fl. a year. As
Hofmusikus, Steffani received 300 fl., in addition
to a clothing allowance of 300 fl. a year, by a
decree of Jan. 15, 1672. At the commencement
of Oct. 1673 he travelled to Rome in order to
perfect himself in his art. Here he began to
compose assiduously, for there is a small oblong
volume of motets in the Fitzwilliam Museum at
Cambridge, an original MS., of which there seems
no reason to doubt the authenticity. This is, as
far as I know, the only autograph score of his in
existence, and strange to say has hitherto been
unnoticed. In it we find the following composi
tions, all dated except one. To speak of them
chronologically: — the first, dated Nov. 1673, is a
' Laudate Pueri ' for 9 voices, divided into 2 choirs,
the first composed of S. S. A. T. B., and the second
of S. A. T. B. It contains some fine part-writing
and massive effects, also an astonishing bass
passage.
in ter - ra
The next, dated Dec. 30, 1673, is a splendid
and altogether remarkable 'Laudate Dominum
for 8 canti concertati, divided into 2 choirs.
in which the most beautiful part-writing anc
counterpoint are combined. Again in 1673,
with no month given, we have a 'Tribuamu:
Domino' — one short movement for 2 choirs o;
S. S. A. T., without any bass voice part. Ir
the following year we have a ' Sperate in Deo
for S. S. A. T. B. in three fine movements, th<
last a fugue. In one of the movements ther<
is a very bold passage in thirds in contrary
motion. The remaining piece, not dated, is i
'Beatus vir' for S. S.B., with 2 violins and i
bass, not quite equal to the other compositions.
In Rome he appears to have had a long illness
as he received 50 crowns extra for expense;
incurred while laid up. This illness, and a journe]
to Venice, for which he received a sum of 665 fl
ii kr. in three instalments, render it improbabh
that he found time to take lessons from ErcoL
3 See Rudhart's ' Geschichte der Oper am Hofe zu Miinchen. Nac
archivalischen Quellen bearbeitet. Erster Theil, Die Italiiinisch
Oper, 1651-1787.'
694
STEFFANI.
Bernabei in Rome, for both Steffkni and he were
in Munich in the summer of 1674. Bernabei
succeeded Kerl as Kapellmeister at Munich in
that year. After his return Steffani again took
up his position as Kammerrnusikus with a pay of
770 fl. 20 kr., and almost immediately published
his first work, ' Psalmodia vespertina volans 8
plenis vocibus concinenda ab Augost. Steffana
in lucem edita setatis suse anno 19 Monachii
1674.' This work was a brilliant success for the
young composer, and a portion of it was thought
worthy of being included by Padre Martini in
his 'Saggio di Contrappunto,' published just a
hundred years later. The extract is a fugue
' Sicut erat in principio,' ' estratto dal Magnificat
dei Salmi brevi a 8 voci pieni.' Padre Martini
here speaks of Steffani as one of the most remark
able professors that music can boast. Hawkins
mentions that this work was previously printed
during his stay in Rome in 1674, so that the
generally received notion of his having been a
pupil of Ercole Bernabei is in all likelihood
erroneous,1 but that he gathered his knowledge
from John Kaspar Kerl, a pupil and follower of
Carissimi, and from his own study. On March I,
1675, he was appointed court organist.
But music was not the only study which had
occupied his mind ; he must have been well
educated from his early youth, for though he left
Venice before he was 12 years old his writing
remained through life an Italian hand. He had
studied mathematics, philosophy, and theology
with so much success that in 1680 he was
ordained a priest of the Roman Catholic Church,
with the title of Abbate of Lepsing ; and such
was the favour shown to him by the new Elector,
his old friend Ferdinand Maria having died the
year before, that a decree of Nov. 3, 1 680, accords
to the 'Honourable priest, Court and Chamber
musician, and Organist Steffani,' a present of
1 200 florins for ' certain reasons and favours '
(gewissen Ursachen und Gnaden). Hitherto he
had confined himself to the composition of motets
and other church music, but now appeared his
first work for the stage. The title, taken from
the contemporary MS., evidently the conducting
score, in the Royal Musical Library at Bucking
ham Palace, in an Italian hand, probably that
of his secretary and copyist Gregorio Piva, runs
thus : — ' Marco Aurelio, Dramma posto in Musica
da D. Agostino Steffani, Direttor della Musica
di Camera di S. A. S. etc., di Baviera, Tanno
1681.' It will be seen that a further step had
been gained — he was now Director of Chamber-
music. The score does not mention any wind
instruments, but the overture is scored for 5
strings, the songs chiefly for 4. In the 1st act
one of the characters accompanies another on the
stage, but the instrument, probably a cembalo, is
not mentioned. The overture opens with a short
introduction of a broad character, followed by a
fine and spirited fugal movement, and ending
with a charming minuet. The first two acts finish
with a ballet ; but after the 3rd and last act we
i Eudhardt can find no trace In the accounts at Munich of his
having had any lessons from Beraabei.
STEFFANI.
have a Scenico spettacolo rappresentato dai 15
Musici di Corie. This commences with a mock
rehearsal, in. which such sentences are found as
' Ah ! ah ! ah ! mi sento poco in voce,' etc. (my
voice is in bad order). The opera contains many
fine recitatives and melodious airs. For the time
it was written it is a remarkable work, bearing
traces of real genius. It is curious to find Fetis
stating that the Da Capo was first introduced by
Alessandro Scarlatti in his opera ' Teodora,1 given
in Rome in 1693, whereas it is already here in
general use 12 years before, and Steffani himself
probably borrowed it from Cavalli, who had greatly
advanced opera since the days of Monteverde,
and whose works Steffani must have heard in
Venice, either in his chorister days or during his
journey in 1674. In 1683 appeared soroe Sonate
da Camera for 2 violins, alto, and bass, and in
1685 a collection of motets entitled ' Sacer Janus
Quadrifrons 3 voc. Monachii,' but no trace of
these works is to be found. For the Carnival
of 1685 he composed the opera ' Solone,' to words
by Ventura Terzago, court poet since 1677.
This appears to have been an opera buffa in 3
acts ; the score however, like all the Munich
operas by Steffani with the exception of ' Marco
Aurelio,' is lost. In conjunction with Terzago,
he further composed in this year a musical in
troduction for a tournament, with the following
title : — 'Audacia e Rispetto, prerogative d'Amore,
disputate in Campo di Marte. Torneo celebrato
tra i carnevaleschi divertimenti della sua Elleto-
rale corte dal Seren. Massimiliano Emanuele,
etc., nell' anno 1685.' The new Elector Maxi
milian Emanuel was married at the end of 1685
to the Archduchess Maria Antonia, daughter of
Leopold I., and the wedding festivities in Munich
in the first days of January 1686 began with the
opera 'Servio Tullio,' again by Terzago and
Steffani, with ballets arranged by Rodier, and
music to them by Dardespin, the Munich Concert-
meister, danced by 12 ladies and gentlemen of
the court, with costumes from Paris. The music
made its mark, as we shall see hereafter. On
Jan. 1 8, 1687, the birthday of the young Electress,
we have an opera — the text of which was by the
new Italian secretary Luigi Orlandi, whose wife
sang on the stage — called ' Alarico il Baltha, cioe
1'audace, re del Gothi,' with ballets composed,
arranged, and danced as before. For this opera
fresh Italian singers were brought from Italy.
Of the value of Steffani's music to it no record is
given. In 1688 he composed the opera ' Niobe,
regina di Thebe,' probably for the Carnaval, the
text again by Orlandi. This was his last work
for the Court of Munich.
Various reasons have been put forward to ac
count for his leaving a court where he had been
so well treated, and where the art of music was
held in such esteem, for Munich had not only at
this time good singers, a good orchestra, and ex
perienced and intelligent audiences, but had like
wise a splendid musical history. Duke Albert III.
(1438-1460) was a great patron of the art ; he
was followed by other rulers, all lovers of music.
Here at the beginning of the l6th century we
STEFFANI.
STEFFANI.
695
find Meister Ludwig Senfel 'in musica totius
Germanise princeps ' ; here came Cipriano di Rore,
Trajano, Venerolo, and above all, Orlando di
Lasso, 'Fiirst und Phb'nix der Musiker.' Je-
suitenspiele (mysteries) were given here on a
great scale ; one in July 1597, where, besides the
principal actors, we find 900 chorus singers, to
say nothing of 300 devils, who with Lucifer were
driven into the flames of Hell by St. Michael.
Munich besides was one of the earliest cities
where opera found a home in Germany, and
where it was now perhaps best represented.
Everything then made Munich a desirable resi
dence for Steffani. The Elector had granted
him 750 florins on account of his two operas and
for a 'Badekur' in Italy in June 1686. In
May 1688 gracious permission was given to him
to go again to Italy (Welschland) in considera
tion of his 2 1 years' service ; his salary was not
only paid to the end of June, but from the be
ginning of July he was given three years' salary
as a reward ! Not only so, but his debts were
paid by the Court Treasurer out of this, and the
balance was sent to him in Venice, where he had
gone. The main reason for his deserting Munich
was no doubt that on the death of the elder
Bernabei at the end of the year 1687 his son,
who had come from Italy in 1677 to fill the post
of Vice-Kapellmeister, was in the early part of
1688 made Kapellmeister, thus debarring Steffani
from further promotion. Added to this, the
Duke of Brunswick, Ernst August, who had
been present at the festivities when 'Servio Tullio'
was performed, was so delighted with Steffani's
music and singing that he had already made
him an offer to go to Hanover, and Steffani
appears actually to have made use of the leave
granted for the Badekur in Italy in 1686 to
spend his time in Hanover instead of there. The
appointment then of the younger Bernabei to
the Munich Kapellmeistership must have de
cided him at once to leave Munich, and from
Venice at the end of 1688 or early in 1689 he
made his way to Hanover, there to remain and
become Kapellmeister, and a good deal besides.
If Munich was a pleasant place for a musician
of genius, Hanover was not far behind it. It
might not have the same glorious musical his
tory; but Steffani found there congenial society,
and singers and players of great excellence.
The Court of Hanover was renowned for its
magnificence, politeness, and courtesy, which
was however combined with a friendly simplicity
(biirgerliche Einfacheit), and held to be the best
in Germany.1 It was presided over by the cele
brated Duchess (afterwards Electress) Sophia.
One of its principal ornaments was the great
philosopher Leibnitz, who had resided there
since 1676, and who, with the Duchess Sophia,
had raised the tone of the Court to a very
high intellectual standard. There was also the
court poet, Abbate Ortensio Mauro, at once
Geheimer Secretar, Hofceremonielmeister, and
political agent, who came to Hanover in 1679, and
in whom the Duchess placed great confidence.
i See Chrysander's Life of Handel.
Steffani became the friend of these men. Up to
this time the operas at Hanover (chiefly imported
from Venice) were given in the small French
theatre, but that being deemed too small, a new
opera-house was built, which was pronounced to
be the most beautiful in all Germany. It created
the reputation of its architect Thomas Giusti,
and caused him to be called to Berlin and other
towns for similar purposes. The new house
was opened in 1689 with ' Henrico Leone,' by
Mauro and Steffani. This opera, on a truly ex
travagant subject, was brought out with great
splendour. The score in Buckingham Palace
gives a list of the scenes, machinery, etc., which
might astonish even a 19th-century reader.
Machinery.
1. Nave che si spezza.
2. Grilone che porta in aria
Henrico, e lo pone nel suo
nido.
3. L'incanto d'Errea nelle antl-
camere di Metilda.
4. Nube che porta Henrico sul
monte Calcario.
5. Demone ch'alza il Leone in
aria, e lo lascia cadere.
6. Assalto e presa di Bardewich.
7. Carro trionfale tirato da 4
Cavallivivi.
Scenes.
1. Spiaggia con mar tempestoso.
2. Atrio del Palazzo Ducale in
Luneburgo.
3. Giardino.
4. Deserto sparse d'Alberi Sopra
uno de quali e un uido di
Grifoni,
5. Anticamere di Metilde.
6. Prigione.
7. Monte Calcario o Kalcberg.
8. Sala Kegia con apparato d'un
Couvito di Nozze.
9. Bardewich assediato.
10. Porta di Luneburgo ornata a
modo d'arco trionlale.
It had a very great success, was given in German,
in 1696 at Hamburgh and in 1697 at Brunswick,
and acquired great celebrity. The opera shows
marked progress on ' Marco Aurelio.' The cha
racter of the music is altogether of a higher kind,
and has great variety. During the latter part of
the overture a full chorus is heard behind the
scenes before the rise of the curtain. In the 3rd
act we find a fine march, and a pretty gavotte
for orchestra in the ist act. Among the songs,
a charming rondeau, and an accompanied reci
tative of great power in the 2nd act, although
Fe'tis again claims the invention for A. Scarlatti
in 'Teodora.'2 A remarkable chancre is found
in the instrumentation. There are flutes, haut
boys, bassoons, 3 trumpets and drums, in addi
tion to the strings, in 4 parts. There are de
lightful contrapuntal devices in the scoring, all
the wind instruments have obbligato passages,
one air a vigorous fagotto obbligato throughout.
Chrysander states (Life of Handel) that the
opera company in Hanover was divided into
two camps, an instrumental (French) and a vocal
(Italian), both however working harmoniously.
The singers must have been of the best if they
could execute these difficult arias ; the band too
must have been excellent. The leading violin
in the orchestra was Farinelli (uncle of the
famous singer), who had been much in France,
and in Spain too, from whence he brought ' Les
Folies d'Espagne,' known in England as 'Fari-
nell's Ground,' and turned to good account in
Corelli's celebrated opera quinta, dedicated by
the way to the daughter of the Electress Sophia.
Corelli was a great friend of Coneertmeister
Farinelli, and during his tour in Germany spent
2 The accompanied recitative appears really to have been intro
duced by Landi in an opera, ' San Alessio, Dramma musicale dell '.
Cardinale Barberini, Musica di Stefano Landi ; Roma, Paolo Masatti,
1634' (Folio).
696
STEFFANI.
STEFFANI.
some time at Hanover, where he became ac
quainted with the Electoral family. The haut-
bojTs too were particularly good, and Chrysander
supposes that Handel wrote his first hautboy
concerto for this orchestra. It is to be noted
that all Steffani's operas composed in Hanover
have the ist violin part written with the G clef
on the ist line of the stave, which Leopold
Mozart in his Violin School calls the 'French
Clef.' ' Henrico Leone,' it may be said, is
exactly the type of one of Handel's operas,
consisting of an overture alia Lulli, with its in
troduction consisting chiefly of a dotted crotchet
followed by a quaver (as found later in the
opening of the ' Messiah ' overture), recitatives,
songs, duets, and a short ensemble of all the
characters to finish the last act, with the addi
tion of a ballet, which does not occur in Handel,
except in his early Hamburg operas. It is essen
tial to understand how these dotted figures are
to be interpreted, whether according to modern
notions or according to the prevailing custom a
century since. Leopold Mozart in his Violin
School leaves no doubt about it. He says : —
' In slow pieces there are certain passages in
which the dot must be held somewhat longer
than the above-written rule demands if the per
formance is not to become too sleepy. For ex
ample, in the following passage (a), if the dot
were held its usual length it would at once sound
(a) Adagio. (b)
lazy and sleepy. In such a case the dotted note
must be held a little longer. The time for hold
ing it must, so to speak, be deducted from the
note following the dot. It would be very good
if this long sustaining of the dot were very
decided and marked. I at least have often done
it, and I have indicated my idea of the perform
ance with two dots (b) as well as the shortening
of the following note. True it appears strange
to the eye; but what does that matter? The
phrase has its meaning, and musical taste will
be advanced.'
' Henrico Leone ' was followed in the summer
of this year by ' La lotta d'Hercole con Acheloo,'
a divertimento drammatico in I act, a charming
work, written probably also by Mauro. In this
we find the germ of Handel's ' Angels ever bright
and fair." The Symphony commences thus : —
J
-J/^ J* — — •—
. -^—
•_
»
— _ f— — ' ^fl— — = *— -p »—
?
.
Che stan-chez - za m'ag-gra-va
The air thus:
—
•-
* •
Viol. N f*
iTiir
^-J ;,_
Again — _
j ^Ufb.l^l N^kr|
•-
i —
•3
i_
**-?-
• • i
F ^ —
Ca-ra dolce spe-ran-za non
ti pa
• *
r-tir.
Ca-ra
tJ
il - Ian - gui - di - to e las - so
-H: ~, \—^ TZT-
•
r
!
»-J
-p
-\—p *" [^
LUr1 1
^/ ^ \-(£> - ~rs
1 ' '
Again —
There are dances for ' Les gens de Cour.' It
was probably performed at the Summer Theatre
at Herrenhausen. The next opera was ' La su-
perbia d' Alessandro,' in 1690 (the conducting
score gives 1691 as the date), the words by
Mauro ; a fine work. Many songs have ob-
bligato instrumental parts, especially one in the
2nd act, where 2 flutes obbligati are sustained
by muted violins and alto — a beautiful piece;
also one song with cembalo solo. This opera also
found its way to Hamburg and Brunswick in a
German translation. ' Orlando generoso ' came
outini69l — another fine work written in conjunc
tion with Mauro. Here we find the first idea
of Handel's Hallelujah Chorus, and some of
the divisions in ' Why do the nations ? ' This
again was given later at Hamburg. Chrysander
speaks of an opera called ' II zelo di Leonato '
in 1691, but it is doubtful if Steffani composed
the music. ' Le Rival! concordi ' appeared in
1692, written again by Mauro, and afterwards
performed at Hamburg. We now come to ' La
liberta contenta ' (Mauro) in 1693, in which evi
dence is given of great further progress, for
nothing of such importance had hitherto come
from his pen. It is full of beauties of all kinds
—a fine overture, fine counterpoint, beautiful
melodies, very difficult arias, and powerful reci
tatives. It had the greatest success, and was
most highly thought of at Hamburg. The
movements are longer and more developed than
in his previous works. We find the second sub
ject of the last movement of Schumann's PF.
Concerto thus foreshadowed : —
tr
A u > «-• f •
r^ i !•
(fl).^
-%& — • 1 — UH
tr
tr
T /»
(~s
/•I) r- " k
£•* i*1 h
-4- — IT-?-
m
and a remarkable passage in a recitative
Recit. Aspasia.
STEFFANI.
Chrysander speaks of an opera ' Der siegende
Alcides,' as probably of the year 1694, but it is
not in the collections of scores, nor is it mentioned
in the five volumes of favourite arias and duets
by Steffani brought from Hanover by George I.,
and now in the musical library at Buckingham
Palace. It was however given in Hamburg two
years later as an opera by Mauro and Steffani ;
the book arranged from Quinault's ' Alceste,' as
written for Lulli.
It was in the next year that Steffani issued his
celebrated pamphlet, entitled ' Quanto certezza
habbia da suoi Principii la Musica, ed in qual
pregio fosse perci6 presso gli Antichi. Amster
dam, 1695. Risposta di D. A. Steffani Abbate
di Lepsing Protonotario della San Sede Aposto-
lica. Ad una lettera del Sn. March0. A. G. In
difesa d'una Proposizione sostenuta da lui in una
Assemblea Hannovera Sett. 1694. 72 pp. in 12.'
It was translated twice into German ; in 1699 by
Andreas Werckmeister at Quedlinburg ; in 1760
by Jean Laurent Albrecht at Muhlhausen. Padre
Martini says it was printed ' da otto volte,' which
has been assumed by Burney to mean that it
was printed eight different times, whereas it
simply signifies that it was printed in octavo !
In this pamphlet he ably discusses the question
whether music exists only in the imagination, or
is grounded on nature and science. It is need
less to say that he upholds the dignity of the
art in all its bearings. — In 1695 we have the
opera ' I trionfi del Fato, o le glorie d'Enea,'
another charming work. It found its way to
Hamburg in 1699. An opera in I act, 'Bac-
canali,' was also composed this year for the small
theatre in Hanover. It is a work of great
beauty, and contains the first notes of Handel's
' Let the bright Seraphim/
2me. Air de Ballet.
STEFFANI.
697
For the Carnival of 1696 the grand opera of
' Briseide ' was composed, the words by Palmieri,
Comes Italus. No composer's name is mentioned,
and Chrysander thinks it is not by Steffani; but
the two scores and collections of Steffani's songs
at Buckingham Palace leave little doubt on ex
amination that it is his work, and in his usual
manner. We may add that it contains the first
ideas of Handel's ' O ruddier than the cherrv '
•/
and ' How beautiful.' These were the golden
days of the opera in Hanover.
A change was now about to take place in
Steffanins circumstances. He was no longer to
be the active composer of operas, and Kapell
meister, but from this time forth was destined
to devote his time chiefly to diplomacy, though
he never forsook the art of which he was so
great an ornament. Ernst August had sent
5000 men to assist the Emperor against the
Turks, and some 8000 against the French ; his
two eldest sons, George (afterwards king of
England) and Frederick Augustus, had served in
the field, and three others had been killed in
the wars. The Emperor as a reward determined,
in 1692, to create a 9th Elector, and raise the
younger branch of the house of Brunswick-
Luneburg to the Electorate. This was generally
deemed just, but many difficulties stood in the
way, and during four years the position of Ernst
August as Elector became more and more dif
ficult, so that, in 1696, it was determined to send
an Envoy Extraordinaire round to the various
German Courts to smooth matters over, and Ernst
August and Leibnitz could find no one among
the court personnel in Hanover so well fitted
for the post as Abbate Steffani. With the title
of ' Envoye" Extraordinaire ' he set out on his
mission, and so admirably did he succeed, that
at the end of the mission he was not only granted
a considerably larger salary than he had hitherto
had at Court, but Innocent XL was induced
to raise him to the dignity of Bishop (in partibus
infidelium} of Spiga in Anatolia, Asia Minor —
the ancient Cyzicus. This was also, perhaps in
recognition of Steffani's services, aided by the
tolerant Leibnitz, in procuring for the Roman
Catholics in Hanover the privilege of holding
public worship. Steffani was now an accom
plished courtier and diplomatist. In the early
part of 1698 he was sent to Brussels as Ambas
sador, and there had his first audience on
March i. In this year the Elector Ernst August
died, and Steffani afterwards transferred his
services to the Elector Palatine at Diisseldorf,
where he became a Privy Councillor as well as
the Pope's Protonotarius for North Germany,
though at what time this occurred is not known.
For some thirteen years after 1696 there is no
record of there having been any operas composed
for the Court of Hanover, except two by a Signer
Mancia, one in 1697, another undated; but in
1 709 we find Steffani again with two new operas,
one for the Court at Hanover, the other at
Diisseldorf. Both are stated in the scores at
Buckingham Palace to be by Gregorio Piva —
his secretary, whose name he adopted for his
compositions after he became a statesman, and
this is the earliest date at which it occurs in
any of the MSS. of his works, as far as I know.
The opera given at Hanover is called ' Enea, or
Amor vien dal destino,' in the large copy, but
in the conducting score ' II Turno ' — in 3 acts,
and is a very fine work ; again an advance on any
previous effort. The second movement of the
overture has a masterly chorus sung on the stage
before the rise of the curtain, foreshadowing the
grand choruses which Handel afterwards brought
forward in his oratorios; also antedating the
same feature in Meyerbeer's ' Dinorah.' Handel,
indeed, is indebted for one or two ideas to this
opera, notably the opening of the Presto move
ment in the second Suite de Pieces, and again
for a phrase in the chorus ' For unto us.' The
theme before referred to as being like ' Let the
bright seraphim,' is here found in the minor
key. One air is to be accompanied, ' deve esser
698
STEFFANI.
accompagnato da un Concerto intiero cli Chalu-
meau sopra la Scena, da due Fagotti nascosti
dietro le AH ; e da due Teorbe nella Orchestra
le quali perb non suonino che le note segnate.'
A grand aria is also accompanied by three
trumpets, drums, oboi, fagotti, and strings. The
Dlisseldorf opera, ' Tassilone, Tragedia in 5 Atti,'
is only represented at Buckingham Palace by a
vocal score; the overture and all instrumental
effects are wanting, only the bass being given to
the different pieces ; but the singers' names, all
Italian, are mentioned. The music is mostly
excellent. The second act commences with a
charming chorus alternating with dances. The
movements of both these operas of 1 709 are all
long, well developed, and broad, and our com
poser has not failed to march with the times.
Chrysander says that a full score of ' Tassilone '
is in the Berlin library, and remarks that a
much richer use of the instruments is made, and
that the coloratur passages are longer in this
than in his preceding operas. — There remains
one more opera to speak of, 'Arminio,' which,
according to the full score (one of those brought
from Hanover by George I.), was composed for
the Court of the Elector Palatine in 1707.
Though bearing no composer's name, it is with
out doubt a composition of Steffani, entirely in
his manner and one of his very finest ; the in
strumental colouring still more full and varied
than in any other opera of his. And what
further establishes its claim to be considered
Steffani's is the fact that the fine air, with
fagotto obbligato from 'Henrico Leone/ is in
troduced with other words, and for a soprano
instead of a tenor voice. This opera, and
'Tassilone/ show that the Palatine Court at
that time possessed a very fine orchestra, and
a splendid company of singers. Or did the
Hanover company occasionally join its old Han
over Kapellmeister in Diisseldorf ? — cvon Haus
aus,' as the Germans have it. It is quite pos
sible that Steffani composed more operas than
these, and that several may have been written for
Diisseldorf which have not come down to us ; but
what we have, form a splendid series of masterly
works that establish him as a composer of the
first rank, equal to Lulli, greatly his superior as
a contrapuntist, if possibly, and only possibly,
inferior to him in dramatic force. In Hamburg
his reputation was so great that no music was
thought equal to his. There Bach and Handel
as young men must have listened to his operas.
Among other gifts he had great tact in bringing
about very fine performances with his exception
ally good singers and players.
Though, however, his operas were his greatest
works, they could not attain the same universal
popularity as his well-known duets for various
voices, with a bass accompaniment. These are
mostly in three long movements, some with re
citatives and solos, in the cantata form, following
Carissimi and Stradella. Of these celebrated duets
(as an introduction to which Sir John Hawkins
wrote a special biography) there are more than
a hundred in the Biritish Museum (Add. MSS.
STEFFANI.
5055, etc.), and in the splendid copy in 3 vols. in
Buckingham Palace. The words were mostly by
Ortensio Mauro, Averara, Abbate Conti, Conte
Francesco Palmieri, etc. The testimony to the
great excellence of these compositions is abundant.
Burney says, in speaking of these duets, ' Those
of the admirable Abbate Steffani were dispersed
in MS. throughout Europe.' Mattheson again,
' In these duets Steffani is incomparable to all I
know, and deserves to be a model, for such things
do not easily become old.' Chrysander also writes,
' These duets are the greatest of their kind.' To
the foregoing it is useless to add further com
mendation. The most renowned singers, Sene-
sino, Strada, and others, delighted in them, and
used them constantly for practice in both ex
pressive and florid singing. No copies of these
duets are dated, but they were probably all
composed after he went to Hanover ; and some
of them are known to have been written for the
Princess Sophia Dorothea.
The Duke of Brunswick, Anton Ulrich, was
converted to Romanism in 1710, and we find
Steffani going from Diisseldorf to Brunswick
to accept in the name of the Pope a piece of
ground as a site for a Romish church. At
the time of the Carnival of this year we find
him in Venice in company with Baron Kiel-
mansegge, and he there met Handel, whom he
induced to visit Hanover on his way to London.
Handel testifies to Steffani's great kindness to
him while in Hanover ; he was anxious too that
he should become Kapellmeister at this Court.1
About the year 1712 the new church in Bruns
wick was so far ready that the Pope sent Bishop
Steffani, Vicario apostolico delle missione Set-
tentrionali, to consecrate the building and per
form the opening service. Two years later the
Elector of Hanover became King of England,
but Steffani did not accompany him to London,
indeed we do not meet with his name again
till 1724, when the Academy of Ancient Music
in London unanimously elected him its Hon.
President for life. This Academy, of which
Handel was a great supporter, had been insti
tuted by Dr. Pepusch, J. E. Gaillard, the only
known pupil of Steffani, and other musicians,
and had become well known abroad. Many
eminent musicians of the continent were made
honorary members, SfcefFani among the number,
who appears to have sent over the following four
works for performance — the fine and well-known
Madrigal, 'Qui diligit Mariam/ for S. S. A. T. B.
(in which occurs a passage taken by Handel for
the chorus in 'Solomon/ 'Music spread thy voice
abroad ') ; another madrigal, called ' La Spag-
nuola/ 'Al rigor d'un bel sembiante/ for two
altos and tenor, not so remarkable ; and the
beautiful madrigal, 'Gettano i Rk dal soglio.'
i Handel said to Hawkins, ' He received me with great kindness,
and took an opportunity to introduce me to the Princess Caroline
and the Elector's son .... and being called from the city to attend
to matters of a public concern, he leff. me in the possession of that
favour and patronage which himself had enjoyed for a series of years.'
The occasion of Steffani's leaving Hanover was that on April 12 the
Elector was, through his Envoye Steffani, invested by the EmpenT
with the post of Erbschatzmeister (Hereditary Grand Treasurer).
This tends to show that Steffani was at home both at ftiisseldorf,
where the Elector Palatine was very musical, and at Hanover.
STEFFANI.
These are generally found in the MS. collec
tions of the time. The fourth piece was the
great Stabat Mater, composed for S.S. A.T. T. B.,
accompanied by 2 violins, 3 altos, cello and
organo, and undoubtedly one of the finest works
of any composer of the period immediately pre
ceding that of the giants Bach and Handel. His
great contemporaries Alessandro Scarlatti and
Purcell produced nothing finer. No exact dates
can be assigned to these four works, but they
all belong to his later manner. In Steffani is
to be found the perfection of counterpoint with
out stiffness, and with that real sign of genius, ex-
haustless variety. As in Bach, there is marvellous
freedom in the movement of the parts, and no
hesitation at a good clashing dissonance produced
by this freedom. He was an adept too at writ
ing the charming minuets and gavottes which
were then so fashionable, and with which his
operas abound. At the British Museum there
is likewise a glorious ' Confitebor ' for 3 voices
•with violins and bass in E minor, said to be of
the year 1709, with a splendid bass solo ('Sanc
tum et terribile') — a species of accompanied
recitative ; the whole work being full of exquisite
beauties. No notice of this piece has yet ap
peared in any life of Steffani's. In the Sacred
Harmonic Society's library there is a book of
'XII Motteta par celeberrimum Abbatem Ste-
plianum ' for 3 voices with solos and recitatives,
but it is only a vocal score, without the sym
phonies and accompaniments which all undoubt
edly had. In another book in the same library
however we find two of them complete. In their
mutilated form it is not always easy to judge of
the value of these motets, but some movements
are certainly very fine, especially the last of
no. 3, the first of the 5th, and the last Fugue
of no. 8, which is very broad and quite Han-
delian. The movement 'Pro Christo ' in this
motet was introduced at the end of a collection
of glees published by Hindle some 60 or 80 years
since, and inserted ' by desire,' showing that the
work was then popular. Hawkins mentions that
Dr. Cooke had a book of 12 Motets for three
voices, ' among them two that are exquisitely
fine.' This is no doubt the book referred to.
Early in 1729 Steffani was once more and for
the last time in Italy; and Handel met him
at Rome in March, where he was living at the
Palace of Cardinal Ottoboni. This latter en
thusiast still kept up his Monday performances
of music, at which Steffani, now 74 years old,
occasionally sang. Handel tells us (through
Hawkins) that ' he was just loud enough to be
heard, but that this defect in his voice was amply
recompensed by his manner, in the chasteness
and elegance of which he had few equals.' From
Htandel we also learn that ' as to his person he
was less than the ordinary size of men, of a
tender constitution of body, which he had not
a little impaired by intense study and applica
tion. His deportment is said to have been
grave, but tempered with a sweetness and affa
bility that rendered his conversation very en
gaging; he was perfectly skilled in all the
STEIBELT.
699
external forms of polite behaviour, and, which is
somewhat unusual, continued to observe and
practise them at the age of fourscore.' He was
back in Hanover in a short time, and the next
year, going to Frankfort on some public business,
died there after a short illness.
The last word has not yet been said about this
remarkable musician, and it is to be hoped that
some of his duets, and perhaps his glorious Stabat
Mater and Confitebor may still be heard in the
concert-room. His career was certainly one of
the most extraordinary in musical history. Born
of obscure parents, he raised himself by his
talents and industry from the position of a poor
choir boy, not only to be one of the foremost
musicians of his age, but likewise the trusted
confidant of princes and the friend of such a
man as Leibnitz. The only other instance of an
artist having become an ambassador is to be found
in the painter Rubens. The materials for this
notice have been chiefly gathered from Rud-
hardt, Hawkins, andChrysander,the latter having
obliged me with some important information
hitherto unpublished. [W.G.C.]
STEFFKINS, THEODORE, or THEODORUS, was
a foreign professor of the lute and viol, who
resided in London in the latter half of the i7th
century. He is much commended in Thomas
Salmon's ' Essay to the Advancement of Mufeic,'
1672. His brother, DIETRICHT, was one of the
band of Charles I. in 1641, and his two sons,
FREDERICK and CHRISTIAN, were famous per
formers on the viol. They were members of the
Kino-'s band in 1694, and Christian was living
in 1 71 1. [W.H.H.]
STEGGALL, CHARLES, Mus. Doc. born in
London, June 3, 1826, was educated in the Royal
Academy of Music, principally by Sterndale
Bennett. In 1847 he became organist of Christ
Church Chapel, Maida Hill ; in 1851 a professor
at the Royal Academy of Music, and in 1852
accumulated the degrees of Mus. Bac. and Mus.
Doc. at Cambridge. In 1855 he was appointed
organist of Christ Church, Paddington, and in
1864 organist of Lincoln's Inn Chapel. He has
composed anthems and other church music, and
has lectured upon music in the metropolis and
elsewhere. [W.H.H.]
STEIBELT, DANIEL, a musician now almost
entirely forgotten, but in his own day so cele
brated as a pianoforte-player and composer that
many regarded him as the rival of Beethoven,
was a native of Berlin, where his father was a
maker of harpsichords and pianofortes of con
siderable skill and repute. The date of his birth
is quite uncertain. Most of his biographers state
that he was born in 1755 or 1756, but Fetis de
clares from personal knowledge that he was only
about thirty-six years of age in 1 80 1, which would
place his birth some eight to ten years later.
The details of his early life are as much in
volved in doubt as the time of his birth. It
is, however, certain that his aptitude for music
was early manifest and that it in some way
attracted the attention of the Crown Prince of
700
STEIBELT.
STEIBELT.
Prussia, afterwards Frederick William II. Kirn-
berger was then the leading musician of Berlin,
and to him the Crown Prince entrusted the in
struction of his protege" in the harpsichord and
composition. How long Steibelt was a pupil of
Kirnberger it is impossible to say, but not a
trace of the learned and somewhat pedantic style
of his master is to be found in his method either
of playing or writing. Indeed, the musical world
of Berlin, then under the despotism of Frederick
the Great,1 does not present any influences to
account for the peculiarities which so strongly
marked Steibelt' s after-life, though it may be
fairly conjectured that. in his father's workshops
he obtained that familiarity with the mechanism
of the pianoforte which he was always ready to
turn to the best account. Whatever his musical
education may have been, it was interrupted by
his joining the army for a while,2 and was finally
brought to an end, as far as Berlin was concerned,
by his departure from that city, an event which
perhaps took place as early as 1784.
In what direction he turned his steps seems
wholly unknown, but his career as a composer and
virtuoso commences with his arrival in Paris at
Borne date between 1787 and 1790. He did not
take up his residence there permanently till the
last-named year, as he was at Munich in 1788,
and in 1 789 was giving concerts in Saxony and
Hanover, whence he journeyed to Paris by way
of Mannheim ; but his rivalry with Hermann at
court would appear to suggest that he had been
in Paris before the year that was signalised by
the taking of the Bastille. However this may
be, Steibelt appeared at the French capital as a
full-fledged performer and composer, and was not
long in proving his superiority to his rival. The
reasons for his success are obvious. Though
Hermann's technique, which was that of the
school of C. P. E. Bach, was considered more
correct than that of his opponent, he was, never
theless, emphatically a player of the old style.
Steibelt, as emphatically, belonged to the new.
Their different characteristics are clearly brought
out in the very curious Sonata for the Pianoforte
called 'La Coquette' composed for Marie Antoi
nette by the two rivals, each of whom contributed
one movement to it. Hermann's movement, the
first, is good, solid, rather old-fashioned, harpsi
chord music ; Steibelt's movement, the Hondo,
by its variety of phrasing and the minutiae of its
marks of expression reveals in every line an
acquaintance with the resources offered by the
pianoforte. The issue of a contest in which the
combatants were so unequally matched could
not be doubtful, and Steibelt was soon installed
as reigning virtuoso. But no musician who
aspires to fame in France can neglect the stage,
and Steibelt accordingly resolved to essay dra
matic composition. One of his patrons, the
Vicomte de S<%ur, a litterateur of some preten
sions, who had written for the Opera a libretto
founded on Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet,'
1 For an interesting account of music in Berlin at this period see
Jahn's ' Life of Mozart,' ch. 80 (vol. ii. p. 374 etc. in Eng. trans.).
2 A. M. Z. ii. p. 622.
entrusted the composition of the music to Stei
belt. The score was finished in 1792, but the
work was rejected by the Academic. Its authors,
nothing daunted, proceeded to alter the piece.
The recitatives were suppressed and replaced by
prose dialogue, and in this shape the Opera was
produced at the The'atre Feydeau on Sept. 10,
1793, with Madame Scio as Juliet. The 'Moni-
teur' of Sept. 23 describes the music as 'learned,
but laboured and ugly' — a criticism which, with
the music before one, it is impossible to under
stand. Theatre-goers were of a different opinion,
and 'Rome'o et Juliette' was a decided success.
The merits of the work, perhaps Steibelt's greatest
achievement, will be discussed subsequently. It
will be enough at present to note that it was
performed with success in Stockholm on Jan.
30, 1815 (and again in 1819), and was revived
with great applause in Paris at the The'atre
Royal e de I'Ope'ra Comique in 1822. It does
not appear that it was ever brought forward on
the German stage, but the Overture was played
in Vienna in 184 1 . The concert given after Stei
belt's death for his son's benefit was closed with
the Funeral Chorus from the third act.
The success of this operatic venture completely
confirmed Steibelt's position in Paris. His
music, though considered difficult, was extremely
popular, and as a teacher he counted amongst
his pupils the most eminent ladies of the time,
including the future Queen of Holland. Society
made up its mind to overlook his discourteous
and overbearing manners in consideration of his
artistic merits, and nothing was needed to confirm
his fortunes and his fame but that he should be
true to himself. Unfortunately, this condition was
not fulfilled. He appears to have been a victim
to kleptomania, and in the last century this was
regarded as a proof of moral rather than of in
tellectual disease. It must also be admitted
that facts seemed to warrant this view in Stei
belt's case. On his first coming to Paris he had
been received with great kindness by Boyer the
publisher, who had not only procured for him
powerful patronage but even took him into his
own house. His services were ill rewarded. Stei
belt had already published some Sonatas for the
Pianoforte and Violin (ops. I and 2) at Munich.
He now added to them a cello ad libitum part,
which merely doubled the bass of the pianoforte
part, and sold them to Boyer as new works. The
fraud seems to have been discovered about 1 796,
and though Steibelt made reparation by present
ing to the aggrieved publisher his Pianoforte
Concertos, Nos. I and 2, this transaction, com
bined with other irregularities, so injured his
reputation that he felt it desirable to leave Paris,
at any rate for a time. England attracted his
attention, and, journeying by way of Holland,
he reached London about the close of if()6.3
By this proceeding Steibelt challenged com
parisons quite as dangerous as those which he
3 According to Fdtis, Steibelt did not leave Paris till 1798, but
Messrs. Broadwood and Sons have records in their possession which
prove that he was established in London by Jan. 2. 1797. This in
fo: mation is due to the kindness of Mr. A. J. Hipkins.
STEIBELT.
had recently risked by bringing out an opera in
Paris. Pianoforte music had originated in London
a quarter of a century before, and at Steibelt's
arrival no fewer than three players and composers
of the first magnitude were resident there, de
menti, Dussek, and Cramer. Few particulars of
Steibelt's life in London have been recorded.
His first public performance seems to have been
at Salomon's Benefit Concert on May 1, 1797, and
a fortnight later (May 15) he played a pianoforte
concerto of his own at an opera concert. Not
long after this he wrote the celebrated Pianoforte
Concerto in E (No. 3), containing the 'Storm
Rondo.' Whatever may be thought of the merits
of this work now, its popularity at the beginning
of the century was enormous, and far exceeded
that accorded to any other of Steibelt's composi
tions. It is not too much to say that it was
played in every drawing-room in England ; in
deed, the notorious ' Battle of Prague ' alone
could compete with it in popular favour. It was,
in all probability, first performed in public at
Salomon's concert on March 19, 1798. At the
close of the same year (Dec. n) its author again
came forward as a composer for the stage, and
again met with a favourable reception. His
work on this occasion was an English opera,
or, as it was described in the Covent Garden
play-bill, 'a new grand Heroic Romance, in 3
acts, called Albert and Adelaide ; or the Victim
of Constancy.' It must have been an extra
ordinary medley. The first two acts were a
translation from the German of Schoerer, who
had taken them from the French, and the
third act was added from another French play.
The music was only in part original, and was
eked out by the insertion of a Quintet from
'Lodoiska' and the like expedients. Even the
original music was not all written by Steibelt, as
Attwood contributed some of it.1 Yet, after all,
the most curious part of this curious production
must have been the Overture, which was 'en
livened by a pantomime' ! Such as it was,
however, the piece proved sufficiently attractive
to keep the boards for some time, and the Over
ture, arranged for the pianoforte, was published
in France and sold in Germany. As teacher and
performer Steibelt appears to have been as fully
employed during his stay of three years or so in
London as he had been previously in Paris.
Whether he was as much liked by his brother
artists as by the amateurs seems very problem
atical ; at any rate his music is conspicuous by its
absence in the concert programmes of the time.
Two other circumstances of interest connected
with Steibelt's visit to England have been pre
served. The first of these is the fact that he
conceived a decided predilection for English
pianofortes, always using them in preference to
any others ; the second is his marriage with a
young Englishwoman, described as possessed of
considerable personal attractions and as a good
player on the pianoforte and tambourine. The
i This information is derived from an advertisement of Longman.
Clement! & Co. in the ' Morning Chronicle ' of Jan. 22, 1799. These
pasticcios were common enough then, and until the end of the first
quarter of the present century.
STEIBELT.
701
last-named accomplishment led her husband to
add a tambourine accompaniment to many of his
subsequent pieces.
Steibelt now resolved on visiting his native
country, from which he had been absent, accord
ing to some authorities, as much as fifteen years.
He reached Hamburg in September or October
1 799, but made no great stay there. His next
stopping-place was Dresden, where he met with
a very enthusiastic reception. Besides several
more or less private performances, he gave a
concert of his own on Feb. 4, 1800, with the
greatest success. Almost immediately after this
he went to Prague. His concert in the Bohemian
capital attracted a large audience of the upper
classes and brought him no less than 1800 gulden,
but his playing made little impression, and he
went on forthwith to Berlin.2 Before the end
of April he had given two performances in his
native city. It was not very likely that his style
would please audiences who still held to the
traditions of the school of Bach, and the main
result of his visit seems to have been to give
great offence to his brother artists. From the
capital of Prussia he turned to the capital of
Austria, then the metropolis of the musical
world, where he arrived about the middle of
May. We are told that his reputation was such
as to cause some anxiety even to Beethoven's
friends. If such was the case they were speedily
relieved. At the first meeting a sort of armed
truce was observed, but at the second Steibelt
was rash enough to issue a distinct challenge.
Beethoven was not the man to decline such a
contest, and his victory was so decided that his
rival refused to meet him again. [See BEE
THOVEN, vol. i. pp. 1 68 a, 178 &.] This adventure
was not likely to contribute to Steibelt's success
at Vienna, and a concert that he gave at the
Augarten-Saal was rather thinly attended. His
German tour as a whole was only partially suc
cessful, and Steibelt determined to return to the
more congenial atmosphere of Paris. He arrived
there in August 1800, carrying with him the
score of Haydn's ' Creation.'
The 'Creation' is one of the very few triumphs
of musical art that have been received with
favour from the first, and at this time an ac
tive competition for the honour of producing
it was going on everywhere. Steibelt does
not seem to have been first in the field at
Paris, as Pleyel, Haydn's favourite pupil, had
been despatched to request the veteran composer
to come and conduct his own work. Pleyel,
however, was unable to reach Vienna [PLEYEL,
vol. iii. p. 3 a], and the field was thus left open
to Steibelt. He made the most of his opportuni
ties. Not content with obtaining 4000 francs
from Erard for himself and his assistant, M. de
Se'gur, as the price of the translation adapted
to the music, and 3600 francs for himself and
2400 francs for his fellow- translator from the
administration of the Opdra, where the work
2 All authorities seem to place the visit to Berlin between his
concert at Prague and his arrival at Vienna. Otherwise it would be
natural to conjecture from the dates that he went to Berlin before
going to Dresden.
702
STEIBELT.
was to be performed, he transposed the part of
Adam to suit the tenor Garat, and in many
places even attempted to improve Haydn's music
by additions and alterations of his own. In
spite of these drawbacks, the performance, which
took place on Christmas Eve, 1800, proved a
decided success. Public curiosity was much ex
cited ; a fortnight before the performance not a
box was to be had ; an eager crowd surrounded
the Opera House at nine in the morning ;
at the end of the first part a subscription was
started to strike a medal in honour of the com
poser (nay, so much was the work on every
one's lips that one of the, vaudeville theatres
produced a parody of it three days later called
'La recreation du monde'). Rey directed the
performance and Steibelt presided at the piano
forte. The adaptation of the words seems to
have been fairly performed ; at the alterations
made in the score competent judges were, na
turally enough, extremely indignant. Moreover,
the circumstances of his departure some four or
five years before had not been forgotten, and
thus, in spite of the eclat of the 'Creation,'
Steibelt did not feel very comfortable in Paris.
Even the success of his ballet 'Le Retour de
Zephyr' at the Opera, on March 3, 1802,
did not reconcile him to his position, and he
embraced the opportunity afforded by the con
clusion of the Treaty of Amiens on the 2 2nd of
the same month, and returned to London.
The next six years of his life, about equally
divided between London and Paris, were among
the busiest of his busy career. His popularity
in London was as great as ever ; he lived in the
most fashionable part of the town, and was re
ceived with applause wherever he went. For
the King's Theatre in the Haymarket he wrote
two ballets, ' Le Jugement du berger Paris ' in
3 acts (produced May 24, 1804), and 'La belle
Lai ti ere' (produced Jan. 26, 1805). It seems
very characteristic of the composer that his work
was not ready on either occasion. In the former
case several airs had to be written at a very
short notice by Winter, who was also responsible
for the scoring of the second act 1 ; in the latter
case an apology was circulated for the omission
of the denouement of the piece, ' Mr. Steibelt not
having finished that part of the music.' 2 Both
ballets were, nevertheless, received with great
favour, the march in the first act of ' Le Juge
ment ' and the pastoral scene in the second act
of 'La belle LaitieYe' coming in for special
applause. He also played his Pianoforte Con
certo No. 5 (a la chasse, op. 64) at the Opera
concerts, apparently in the summer of 1802,
with great success. After his return to Paris
Steibelt followed up his dramatic achievements
in England with an Intermezzo, 'La Fete de
Mars,' composed in celebration of the Austerlitz
campaign, and performed at the Opera on March
4, T 806. Encouraged by these successes he again
tried his hand on a larger work, 'La Princesse
de Babylone,' an opera in 3 acts. This was ac-
1 'Morning Chronicle,' May 25, 1804. 2 ibid. Jan. 28, 1805.
STEIBELT.
cepted by the Academic and was in active pre
paration when the importunity of his creditors
compelled the composer to leave Paris suddenly
in the autumn of 1808. But his energies were
by no means confined to writing for the stage.
Several of his chief sonatas date from these
years. Still more important are the two Con
certos in Eb (Nos. 4 and 5), for the pianoforte,
and the 'Methode' for that instrument published
in French, German, and Spanish, in which lie
claims to have invented the signs for the use of
the Pedals adopted by dementi, Dussek, and
Cramer. [See SORDINI, vol. iii. p. 6366.] Above
all, it was on his return to Paris in 1 805 that he
published his Etude, — a collection of 50 studies
in 2 books — undoubtedly the best of his piano
forte works. In the midst of all this occupation
he found time to meditate further travels. Russia,
a country that in the previous century had at
tracted Galuppi, Paisiello, Sarti, Cimarosa, and
Clementi, had just furnished an asylum to Boiel-
dieu and a home to Field, was then a sort of
Promised Land to French musicians, and it is
not strange that Steibelt should have been more
than willing to go there, when he received in
1808 the offer of a very advantageous appoint
ment from the Emperor Alexander. Owing to
causes already mentioned he left Paris for St.
Petersburg in October, 1808. His journey was
not however very speedy when he felt himself
out of the reach of his creditors. He stopped
at Frankfort to give a great concert on Nov. 2,3
and at Leipzig made a stay of some weeks and
repeated the programme of the Frankfort concert.
During his sojourn in Leipzig he put forth (Nov.
24, 1808) a notice in which he complains that
some German publishers had issued very faulty
editions of his works even going so far as to
annex his name to compositions by other people,
and announces his intention of having all his
future works published by Breitkopf & Hartel,
an intention that was not very consistently
carried out. Even after leaving Leipzig he lin
gered at Breslau and Warsaw to give concerts, so
that he could hardly have reached St. Petersburg
till the beginning of the spring of 1809.
Here, at last, his wanderings came to an end.
He was appointed, it is not very clear when,
director of the Ope*ra Francais, and when Boiel-
dieu left, at the close of 1810, Steibelt received
the title of ' Maitre de Chapelle ' to the Emperor
in his place. It was, however, a title to which
no emolument was attached, and that in no way
relieved its possessor from professional duties.
In managing and writing for the Opera, and in
teaching and composing for the pianoforte, the
remaining years of Steibelt's life were spent,
comparatively at least without excitement.
About the year 1814 he ceased to play in public,
and did not appear again for six years, when
the production of his Eighth Pianoforte Con
certo — a very remarkable work — induced him to
come forward once more as a performer on
March 16, 1820. Meanwhile his pen was not
3 The corre icndent of the A. M. Z. (xi. 170) oddly describes him as
' Steihelt of L«. .don.'
STEIBELT.
idle. His early years at St. Petersburg were
marked by the ballets 'La Fete de 1'Empereur'
in 1809, and 'Der blode Hitter' (before the end of
1812); and the three Concertos for pianoforte,
Nos.^ 6, 7, and 8, appear to belong to the period
of his abstention from playing in public. For
the theatre he wrote two operas, each in three
acts, « Cendrillon ' * and 'Sargines'; a third,
'Le Jugement de Midas,' he did not live to
finish. He also spent some time in revising
'Rome'o et Juliette.' In the midst of these
avocations he was seized with a painful disease,
of which, after lingering some time, he died on
Sept. 20, 1823. A number of his friends com
bined to honour him with a quasi-public funeral,
and the military governor of St. Petersburg,
Count Milarodowitsch, organised a subscription-
concert for the benefit of his family, who were
left in very straitened circumstances.
Comparatively little has been recorded of
Steibelt's personal character, but the traits pre
served are, to say the least of it, far from pre
possessing. Almost the only occurrence that
presents him in a pleasing light is his death-bed
dedication of the revised score of ' Rome'o et
Juliette ' to the King of Prussia, in token of
gratitude for the kindnesses received from that
monarch's father. He appears to have been
perfectly eaten up with vanity, which exhibited
itself unceasingly in arrogance, incivility, and
affectation. In his native country he provoked
' tiMWBi"
STEIBELT.
'03
8 ••-
The above k reduced from the aquatint engraving by
Quenedey, oi tl e p i'1 i» i -i ii\, prefixed to each of
the two parts ol the uig.ua: edition of the 'Etude pour le
Piano Forte.'
dislike by acting the foreigner and professing
ignorance of German — indeed in Berlin, his
birthplace, he inspired such disgust by his
demeanour at his first concert that the orchestra
refused to take any part in the second, and
similar violations of courtesy are related of him
wherever he went. Graver faults still are not
wanting. That he was a kleptomania? has been
1 It is worth noting that some authorities declare thif :was -written
for Paris. This opera has been considered his greatest. >ork.
already mentioned. To this he added a reckless
extravagance in money matters that amounted
to criminality. Though he must have been for
many years in receipt of a large income, he was
always out at elbows, and this exercised a most
pernicious influence on. his character both as an
artist and as a man. His respect for his art,
never too great, was destroyed by the quantity
of worthless music that he wrote hastily to meet
temporary difficulties, and he not unfrequently
stooped to expedients still more unworthy. One
of these has been already mentioned, but it was
not the only one. Complaints of old works
palmed off as new on publishers, and through
them on the public, by the alteration of the
first few bars, transpositions, or the like, are
only too rife. A device that seems to have
been specially common was to add a violin
part to a published set of pianoforte sonatas
and then bring out the result as an entirely
new work.
The greatness of his abilities as a musician is
perhaps best proved by the fact that they caused
so unattractive a person to be not merely toler
ated but welcomed. His pianoforte-playing
was just what might have been expected from
his life and character. The highest ranges of
his art were a terra incognita, to him, and his
inability to perform a slow movement was the
subject of universal comment. To do him jus
tice, he was aware of his deficiency, and seldom
attempted an Adagio. Quick movements, on
the contrary, he played with a precision and
fire that made the liveliest impression. His
technical training appears to have been defec
tive, and, though in his prime he was con
sidered a great executant, his left hand was
always conspicuously weak. He was one of
the first to discover the resources presented by
the pedals of the pianoforte, and, like some
other discoverers, was led to exaggerate the
importance of his discovery. The result of this
was that his performance was always apt to
degenerate into mere tricks of effect. The
critics of his day also complained of his ex
cessive use of the tremolo, a judgment that
appears we.ll grounded, and declared that his
fingering was faulty, which seems more doubt
ful. It is strange, too, considering his appre
ciation of the resources of the pianoforte and
his preference for instruments by English makers
(or by Erard, who used the English action up
to 1808), that he should have made little or no
use of their cantabile powers. But, after mak
ing all deductions of this sort, the broad fact
remains that Steibelt's playing was thoroughly
striking and original, and that he possessed in a
very eminent degree the invaluable power of
carrying his audience with him. Whatever
censure critics might be disposed to pass after
the performance was over, the aplomb and spirit
of his playing fascinated them at the time, and
when he was in a good mood he would interest
his hearers for hours together.
It has been said that the truest test of a com
poser's genius is to be found in his slow move-
704
STEIBELT.
ments. Judged by this standard the multitu
dinous pianoforte works of Steibelt would be
declared wholly wanting. Sonata after sonata
has no slow movement at all, consisting merely
of an Allegro and a Rondo. When an Adagio
or Andante is interpolated, it is either an insig
nificant trifle of some 30 or 40 bars in length,
or else consists of a popular melody, such as
' If a body meet a body,' ' 'Twas within a mile
of Edinbro' town,' or the like. He does not
seem to have ever realised the powers of the
pianoforte for an Adagio, and when a violin
partis added, as is often the case in his sonatas,
he almost invariably assigns the melody to the
latter instrument and accompanies it with a
tremolo on the pianoforte. His Allegros and
Rondos, on the contrary, particularly the former,
are often of remarkable merit, and many of his
sonatas, such as that dedicated to Madame Bona
parte (in Eb, op. 45), are really fine and original
compositions. Yet, even at his best, a want of
sustained power makes itself felt. Though the
absence of records as to his early life makes it
probable that his musical training was not sa
crificed to the profitable speculation of exhibiting
a youthful prodigy, his constructive skill was
never developed. All his music sounds like a
clever improvisation that happens to have been
committed to paper. There is little or no
attempt at development or design. Whenever
a new idea occurs to the writer it is straightway
thrust in, and when no fresh idea presents itself
one of the old ones is repeated. Hence it is
that his music is now totally forgotten, for,
whatever the opinion of contemporaries may be,
posterity has invariably consigned to oblivion
all music, no matter what other qualities it may
possess, that is deficient in design.1 Moreover,
Steibelt exhibits a most annoying inequality of
style. Again and again the opening movement
of a sonata excites the expectation of a really
satisfactory work, as if for the very purpose of
disappointing it by the deficiencies of the
Adagio, if there is one, and the trivialities of
a ' brilliant ' Rondo. His contemporaries pro
nounced the 'Etude' his best work, and time has
confirmed their opinion. It has been often re-
published, and may indeed be said to be the
only work of his that still lives. To a modern
pianist one of the most striking features of the
collection is the fact that several of the pieces
(e.g. Nos. 3 and 8) anticipate in a very note
worthy manner the style made popular by Men
delssohn in his ' Songs without Words.' The
vast mass of Airs with variations, Fantasias,
Descriptive pieces, Pot-pourris, Divertissements,
Bacchanals, and the like, that had a great sale
in their day, are now deservedly forgotten. The
sample of his descriptive pieces already given
[PROGRAMME-MUSIC, vol. iii. p. 360] may serve
as a type of them all. They are of the worst class
of programme-music, with no intrinsic musical
merit. In England and France these pieces
made their composer popular. In Germany, his
i Mme. Arabella Goddard, among her numerous revivals, included
SteibeH's Sonata in Eb, ded. Mad. Bonaparte ; and some Studies.
STEIBELT.
reputation was comparatively nil. His piano
forte works however, good and bad, have all the
great merit of feasibleness, and invariably lie
well under the hand.
For the orchestra and other instruments Stei
belt wrote comparatively little — wisely, in the
judgement of one of his biographers.2 Unfor
tunately, the scores of many of his operatic
works, especially those written for St. Peters
burg, are inaccessible and perhaps lost. It
cannot, however, be said that an examination
of the score of ' Romeo et Juliette ' quite bears
out the sentence just quoted. We are told that
an even division of the interest of the music
between the various instruments is one great
mark of skilful orchestral writing. If this be
so, Steibelt's opera is in one respect skilfully
written, for almost every instrument in the or
chestra comes to the front in turn. More than
this, the composer xises the forces at his command
with power and freedom. The trombones are
introduced to an extent then unusual, though not
excessive. Many of the resources of modern scor
ing are to be found, especially the employment
of wood-wind and strings in responsive groups.
The main complaint that can be sustained
against the work is that the concerted pieces are
unduly protracted and impede the action — this
is certainly the case with the Trio in the first
Act. It should moreover be observed that
when Steibelt writes for the pianoforte and other
instruments, as in his quintets, the pianoforte
is not allowed to monopolise the interest. His
concertos are formed on the orthodox Mozartean
model, and it must be added that they contain,
especially in their first movements, most ex
cellent writing. 'The instrumentation of the
first movement is quite exceptionally beautiful '
was the opinion of one who listened to the per
formance of his Eighth Concerto in London,3
and even when the work as a whole is weak, as
in the Sixth Concerto, the instrumentation is
not deficient in skill and novelty.
Steibelt's originality as a composer was ques
tioned in his own day. It was said that his
famous ' Storm Rondo ' was a feeble copy of a
work for the organ by the Abbe" Vogler, a state
ment on which the thoroughly pianoforte cha
racter of Steibelt's music throws considerable
doubt. His enemies also averred that ' Romeo
et Juliette ' was a mere plagiarism from Georg
Benda's opera of the same name — an allegation
that is certainly unfounded. More serious ob
jection may be taken to his Sixth Pianoforte
Concerto, 'Le Voyage au Mont St. Bernard,'
in which not only the general idea, but even the
most striking details — the hymn of the monks,
the tolling of the convent bell, and the national
music of the Savoyards with accompaniment of
triangles — are borrowed from Cherubim's opera
of ' Elisa ou le Voyage au Mont Bernard.' It
is, in fact, as it has been aptly described, ' the
work, not of an architect, but of a decorator.'
On the otner band, Steibelt must be credited
with some contributions to musical progress.
2 A.M. 7,. x\v. p. 725.
3 Ibid. xxiv. no. 25.
STEIBELT.
Modulation he used with a freedom unknown
before him. The following passage, for instance,
from the Andante of the first Sonata, in op. 37,
STEIBELT.
705
was an unheard-of thing in 1799. Of course,
nothing is easier than to carry such innovations
to excess, and he may be fairly said to have
overstepped the line when in the ' working-out '
of his Sonata for pianoforte and violin in E
minor, op. 32, he introduces the second subject
in Eb major, changing the signature for 56
bars. Another instance is supplied by the two
Sonatas for pianoforte that form op. 56. In
the first, which is in Eb major, he opens
the development with an excursion into Gb
major for 13 bars and into FjJ minor for 31
bars, in each case changing the signature. In
the second he leaves E major for G minor in
the same part of the composition, employing a
new signature for 33 bars. Greater licence still
is to be found in works of less definite outline
than a sonata. In the Fantasia dedicated to
Madame Moreau, which is nominally in Bb
major, he passes after 56 bars through B major
and B minor to C, and with the exception of
the last 33 bars, which return to Bb major,
all the rest of a long work is in this key. But
though he never grasped the plan that groups a
number of subsidiary keys round the central key
[FoKM, vol. i. p. 550 a, and 552 a], and seems
rather to be quite aimless in his wanderings, the
fact remains that in his use of keys he shows
the workings of an original mind. Other cases
that show his readiness to strike out in fresh
directions are to be found in his discovery of the
tremolo on the pianoforte and in his free use of
the pizzicato in chamber music. He employs the
latter, for example, most effectively in the
Kondos of the Sonatas for Pianoforte and Violin,
op. 32, no. 2, and op. 35, no. 3, in the second
of which he uses this expedient in giving out
the subject. The device of introducing a pan
tomime into an overture has found no imitators,
unless the overture to ' Euryanthe ' is to be reck
oned as an imitation [OPEKA, vol. ii. p. 5216],
hut some of his other novelties have had a better
fate. The manner in which he suggests the
'Lieder ohne Worte' in his 'Etude,' and his use
of the trombones, alto, tenor, and especially
bass, in ' Kome'o et Juliette ' have been already
noticed. A similar boldness in orchestral writ
ing is to be found in the first movement of his
Sixth Concerto for Pianoforte, where a passage
occurs in which the violoncellos are divided
into three parts. . Neither Haydn, nor Mozart,
nor Beethoven divide their strings, except the
violas, to any extent, and Steibelt's Concerto is
at least thirteen years anterior to the Overture
to 'Guillaume Tell,' which is usually quoted as
VOL. in. PT. 6.
the early instance of division of the violoncellos
into more than two parts. More important still
is the finale of the Eighth Concerto for Piano
forte, in which — probably following the lead of
Beethoven — he adds voices to the instruments
to form a climax, with an effect described as
thrilling. We may fairly say that a composer
who did these things deserves to be distinguished
from the crowd of merely clever musicians. Had
he but steadily lived and written up to his
abilities it is probable that he might have taken
one of the chief places in the roll of musical
worthies ; as it is, he only adds one more to the
many instances which prove that conspicuous
talent unaccompanied by moral earnestness will
never succeed in making a man great.
The list of his works which follows has been
compiled with considerable trouble. Not only
had Steibelt a careless and, it is to be feared,
dishonest habit, of publishing different works
under the same opus number, and the same or
a slightly altered work under different numbers,
but, according to his own protest already men
tioned, works were published under his name
with which he had nothing to do. Under such
circumstances the task of drawing up a complete
and accurate list is wellnigh hopeless, and this
catalogue, though compiled with all the care
possible, does not profess to be more than a con
tribution towards a complete and exact list. An
asterisk attached to a work means that it cer
tainly contains one sonata (or the number given)
and may contain more. A date has been added
in some cases, where it seemed likely to be of
any value.
Op. 1. 3 Sonatas, PP. and Violin (1788). | Sonata, PF. | 2 Sonatas,
PF. | S Sonatas, PF. | 3 Sonatas, Harp with Violin and Cello ad lib. \
6 Sonatas, PF., with Flute or Violin and Cello.
Op. 2. * Sonata, PF. and Violin (1788). | Sonata, PF. | Sonata, PF.
and Violin (1791). | 3 Sonatas, PF., the first with Violin.' | 2 Sonatas,
PF. | 3 Sonatas. PF., Violin, and Cello.
Op. 3. Sonata, PF., Violin, and Cello (1791). | Turkish Overture,
PF., Violin, and Cello.2
Op. 4. S Sonatas, PF. and Violin. | * Sonata, PF., Violin, and Cello
(1791). | 3 Sonatas, PF., the first with Violin obbligato.3
Op. 5. Premier Caprice, PF. (1792). | Preludes and three pieces, PF.
(1792).4 | 3 Preludes, PF.5
Op. 6. Second Caprice, PF. | Grand Sonata, PF. and Violin ; A
(1792). | 3 Sonatas, PF. | 2 Sonatas and ' La Coquette,' PF., the first
with Violin. | * Sonata, PF. ( Hondo from 3rd PF. Concerto.
Op. 7. 3 Grand Sonatas, PF. (1793). | Turkish Overture. PF., Violin,
and Cello.s | 3 Sonatas.
Op. 8. Grand Sonata, PF. and Violin ; D (1793). | 6 Grand Preludes
or Exercises, PF. (1794). | 3 Quartets for Strings (1799).? | ' Enfant
cheri des Dames ' with var. PF. (1799).s | 3 Sonatas, PF., the third
with Violin.
Op. 9. 6 Divertissements, PF. (1793). | 2 Grand Sonatas, PF. | ' La
Coquette,' PF. ; A.9
Op. 10. Melange d'airs et chansons en Forme de Scene, PF. (1794).io
Op. 11. 3 Sonatas, PF. and Flute, or Violin ; Bb, A, D (1793). I
6 Sonatas, PF. and Violin. | 6 Sonatas, PF. | 6 Sonatas, PF., nos. 1, 4, 5,
and 6, with Violin obbligato, nos. 2 and 3 with Flute obbligato. |
3 Sonatas, PF., Violin, and Cello. | 3 Sonatas, PF. with Violin ace.
(ded. to Mme. Eugenia da Beaumarchois).
Op. 12.
Op. 13. 6 Airs with var., PF. | Duo, PF. and Harp.
Op. 14. 2 Grand Sonatas, PF. (1795). | Duo, Harp and PF.
Op. 15. Grand Sonata, PF.
Op. 16. Grand Sonata, PF. 1 Melange d'Airs.u
Op. 17. 3 Quartets for Strings; Eb. C, F min. (1797).i2
Op. 18. 3 Sonatas, PF., nos. 2 and 3 with Violin (1797). I 3 Sonatas,
PF., with ace. for Flute, or Violin ; G, C. Bb (1799).
1 See op. 4. 2 See op. 7. 3 See op. 2.
4 This appears to have been also styled Preludes and Capriccios.
6 Six Preludes are also published as op. 5. They are probably a
combination of the Preludes in the works given. s See op, 3.
i Probably part of op. 34, and perhaps the same as op. 17.
8 See op. 32. 9 From op. 6. 10 See op. 16.
11 See op. 10. 12 Perhaps the same as op. 8.
Zz
706
STEIBELT.
Op. 19. 3 Sonatas, PF. (1797).
Op. 20. -Sonatas, PF.
Op. 21.
Op. 22.
Op. 23. Grand Sonata, PF. ; Q min.
Op. 24. Preludes, PF. (1797). | Ladies' Amusement, PF.i |
Caprices en Prelude, PF. | Sonata, PF.; G.
Op. 25. Grand Sonata (L'Amante disperata), PF. ; G mm. (1797). |
Preludes, PF. | 2 Sonatas, PF. and Violin ; C, Bb.
Op. 26. 3 easy Sonatas, PF. and Violin ; D, A, F (1799).
Op 27. 6 Sonatas, PF. and Violin (ded. to Queen of Prussia) ; C,
E b, E, B b, G. and ? A (1797).2
Op. 28. 3 Quintets, PF. and Strings ; no. 1, G ; no. 2, ]
(1798) 3 I 3 Sonatas, PF. a 4 mains (T798).4 I ' A me tutte le belle,
Hondo. PF., Violin, and Cello; Eb (1798).5 I 3 easy Divertissements,
PF.
Op. 29. 3 Grand Sonatas, PF. | 2 Eondos. PF. ; F, G.
Op. 30. 3 Sonatas, PF. and Violin. 1 Grand Sonata, PF.with ace. for
Violin ; Bb. | 2 Kondos, PF. ; F, A.
Op. 31. Grand Trio, PF.,Violin, and Bass ; A (TT98)-6 | First Quintet,
PF. and Strings ; D.7
Op 32 Grand Sonata, PF. with ace. for Violin ; E min. | Enlant
cheri des Dames,' Air with var., PF., Violin, and Cello; Eb.8 | 2
Sonatas (with Scotch airs), PF.9
Op. 33. 4 Sonatas of progressive difficulty, PF., with Violin ad lib. ;
0, F G, D (1798). I Concerto no. 3 ('The Storm1), PF. and Orch. ; E
(1799).io | 2 Sonatas, PF., with Violin and Cello ad lib. ; Bb, F." | 6
Bondos. PF. ; C, F, G, D, Bb, F.
Op. 34. 6 Quatuors concertante for Strings, in two books (1798).12 |
24 Waltzes, PF., with ace. for Tambourine and Triangle (1800).i3
Op. 35. 3 Sonatas, PF., with Violin ad lib. ; Eb, F, A (1799). | Grand
Concerto, no. 3 ('The Storm'); E (1799)." | 'Amusement pour les
Dames ' (easy PF. pieces)."
Op. 36. 3 Sonatas (ded. to Mme. de Boigne), PF., with ace. for
Flute, or Violin ; F, Bb, A(1799).ie I 3 Divertissements and 5 Kondos,
PF. (1799). | 3 easy Divertissements, PF. | 3 easy Divertissements and
Airs with var., PF. | Sonata for 2 PF.s (1800). 1 12 Waltzes, PF., with
ace. for Tambourine and Triangle." | Combat Naval, PF., with Violin
and Cello (and Gr. Tambour ad lib.) ; E b.is
Op. 37. 3 Sonatas, PF., with Violin ad lib. The first has also a
Tambourine obbligato ; C, A, Eb.19 I 3 Progressive Sonatas, PF. ; C,
Bb, F. | 3 Sonatas of progressive difficulty, PF., with Violin and Cello
ad lib. | Sonata, PF., with Violin ad lib. ; E b.so
Op. 38. 3 Sonatas, PF., with ace. for Flute, or Violin ; 0, Bb, G.21 1
3 Sonatas, PF. , with ace. for Flute or Violin ; A, D, B b. 1 12 Divertisse
ments (Marches, Waltzes, and Kondos), PF., with ace. for Tam
bourine.
Op. 39. 3 Sonatas (ded. to Mile, de Boigne), PF., with ace. for
Flute or Violin (1800).22 | 6 Bacchanals, PF., with Tambourine ad lib.
Op. 40. 3 easy Sonatas, PF., with Violin ad lib.; A min., C, F.
Sonata, PF., with Violin ad lib. ; E b. | 3 progressive Lessons (also
called Sonatas). PF. ; C, Bb, F. | 3 favourite Eondos, PF. ; C, A, E b.
Op. 41. 3 Sonatas, PF. and Flute (1800). | Combat Naval, PF. (1800).23 |
3 Rondos, PF., with Flute, or Violin ; A, D, B b. | 3 Sonatas, PF. ; C,
Bb, G.24 1 3 easy, pleasing, and progressive Sonatas, PF,; C, Bb, F. |
Easy Sonatas, PF. and Violin. | Easy Sonata, PF.
Op. 42. 6 easy and pleasing Sonatinas; Book 1, 0, Bb, 0; Book 2,
D, Eb, A. | 3 easy. Sonatas, PF. and Violin. | 3 Sonatas. PF., with
Flute or Violin ; A, D, Bb.25 I ' Mamma mia,' arranged as a Hondo,
PF. ; E b. I Naval Fight, a grand national piece, PF.26
Op. 43. 3 Sonatas. PF.; D, Bb, Eb. | Hondo, PF. ; D. | 'Amusement
pour les Dames,' PF.2?
Op. 44. Grand Sonata. PF.. with Flute or Violin ; A. | Fantasia
with var. on 'Der VogelfSnger,' PF.
1 See opp. 35 and 43.
2 Selections from these six appear to have been also published as
op. 27.
3 Six similar Quintets appeared in the following year (see Op.
31). These Quintets were especially famous.
4 These were followed the next year by a fourth, published se
parately.
5 Also published for Harp and PF. The air comes from Paisiello's
' la Modista ragg/ratrfce.'
6 This appears to have been also published for PF., Flute, and
Cello. 7 See op. 28.
8 This was also published for PF. and Harp. See op. 8.
9 See opp. 46 and 62. 10 See op. 35.
11 These 2 Sonatas are described as ' Liv. 2,' so that another book
may have been published.
12 These Quartets appear to be some sort of 'arrangement or selec
tion.
13 In 2 books, each containing 12 Waltzes. The first book was also
published (1) for Harp, Tambourine, Flute, and Triangle; (2) for
2 Violins ; (3) for 2 Flutes. One book was also published as op. 36.
H See op. 33. is Also published as op. 43. See op. 24.
is These appear to have been also published as op. 39.
n Also published for PF., Violin and Triangle. These Waltzes are
part of op. 34. 18 See opp. 41 and 42.
)9 In 1802, 5 Sonatas with Violin ad lib. are announced as forming
this work.
20 It is possible that all the works numbered op. 37 are variants of
the first-mentioned. 21 This was also published as op. 41.
22 These appear to have been also published as op. 36.
23 See opp. 36 and 42. 24 gee op. 38.
25 These were also published as op. 45. They may be identical with
the preceding. 26 See opp. 36 and 41.
27 Also published as op. 35. See op. 24.
STEIBELT.
Op. 45. 3 Sonatas, PF., with ace. for Violin ; A. Eb, Bb. I Grand
Sonata (ded. to Mme. Bonaparte). PF. ; E b. | 3 Sonatas. PF., with
ace. for Flute or Violin ; A, D, Bb.28 | Sonata, PF. and Violin ; A.
Grand Polonaise, PF. and Violin ; E. | Polonaise, PF.
Op. 46. 3 Sonatas ('in which are introduced some admired airs'),
PF., with ace. for Flute or Violin ; B b. A, D.29
Op. 47.
Op. 48. 2 Sonatas, PF. ; Eb, A.30
Op. 49. 6 Sonatas (in 2 books), PF. | Duet for Harp- I 3 Quartets
for Strings. 1 6 Sonatinas of progressive difficulty, PF.
Op. 50. 6 favourite (also called progressive) Sonatas, PF. ; C, Bb,
G, D, Eb, A.
Op. 51. 3 Sonatas, PF. ; C, G, F. Quartet, PF., Violin, Viola, and
Cello ; A.
Op. 52.
Op. 53. 6 Bacchanals, PF., with ace. for Flute, Tambourine, and
Triangle.
Op. 54.
Op. 55.
Op. 56. 3 Grand Sonatas, PF. and Violin; C, D, Bb. | 3 Grand
Sonatas, PF., with Violin ad lib. ; A min., F, C. | 3 Sonatas, PF.,
Violin, and Cello. | 2 Sonatas, PF. ; Eb, E.
Op. 57. 3 Kondos, PF. ; C, Bb, A.
Op. 58. Kondo, PF.; Bb.
Op. 59. Sonata, PF., with Violin ad lib. ; Eb. 1 Grand Sonata, PF.
Sonata, PF., Violin, and Cello.
Op. 60. Sonata (ded. to Duchess of Courland), PF. ; E b. | 6 Sonatas,
PF. | 2 Kondos, PF. ; F, A.
Op. 61. Grand Sonata, PF. ; E b. | 3 Sonatas, PF., with Violin and
Cello. | 2 Sonatas, PF., with Violin and Cello (ad lib.); G, Eb. I 2
Sonatas, PF., with ace. for Violin and Cello ; F, D. | 2 Sonatas. PF.,
Violin, and Cello; Bb, Eb. | Grand Sonata, PF., Violin, and Cello.si
Op. 62. 2 Sonatas, PF. ; F, D (1802).32 | 3 Sonatinas, PF. ; Eb, G, C.
3 Sonatas, PF., with Violin or Flute ; C, Bb, G.
Op. 63. Sonata, PF. ; D. | 3 Grand Sonatas, PF. ; C, F. D (1?02).
Sonata, PF. ; Bb. | Le Kappel a 1'arme'e, Military Fantasia on an air
by Mozart. PF. ; F.33 | * Rondo, PF.
Op. 64. Grand Concerto, no. 5 (a la chasse), PF. and Orch.; Eb
(1802). | Grand Sonata, PF. ; G. | Second Military Fantasia with a
triumphal march by Haydn, PF.
Op. 65. 3 Sonatas, PF., Violin, and Cello. | 3 Sonatas, PF. | Le Rappel
a 1'armee, Military Fantasia, PF, ; F.:4 | * Rondo, PF.
Op. 66. 3 Grand Sonatas, PF., with ace. for Flute or Violin added
by I. Pleyel ; F, G, A (1802). I 3 Sonatas, PF. and Violin. | 2 Sonatas,
PF. ; F, A.35 1 Air favori de Le"once Vari(5, PF. ; D.36
Op. 67. 2 Sonatas, PF. | Grand Sonata, PF., with ace. for Violin.
Sonata, PF., with Flute or Violin ; D.
Op. 68. 3 Sonatas, PF., with Violin ad lib. \ 2 easy Sonatas, PF. | 6
Bacchanals, PF., with Tambourine ad lib.
Op. 69. 3 Sonatas, PF., with Violin, or Cello, or Bassoon obbligato. |
Grand Sonata, PF. and Violin obbligato; G min. | Les Papillons,
Rondo, PF. ; Eb. | 3 Sonatas, PF., Violin, and Cello. | Grand Sonata,
PF.; Eb.
Op. 70. 3 Sonatinas, PF., with Flute or Violin; C, Bb, G. I 3 So
natas, PF., with Violin ; G, F, A. | Sonata for Harp.
Op. 71. 3 Grand Sonatas, PF., with Violin obbligato ; G min., G,
Bb. | Sonata (with a dance air by Duport), PF. and Flute.
Op. 72. 3 Sonatas (or Sonatinas), PF. and Violin or Flute; C, Bb,
G. I La Bohemienne (Air by Choron), with var. ; PF. ; G.
Op. 73. 3 Sonatas, PF. and Violin ; G, F, A.37 | Fantasia with 6 var.
on 'Belisaire,' PF. ; D min. 38
Op. 74. 3 Sonatas, PF. and Violin; Eb, A, E min. | 6 Bacchanals,
PF., with Tambourine ad lib.
Op. 75. 3 Sonatas, PF. | 3 progressive Sonatas, PF., with Violin ad
lib. ; F, G, A. | 2 easy Sonatas, PF. | Fantasia, PF.
Op. 76. 3 Grand Sonatas, PF. ; A, G, Eb.39 | New Turkish Overture,
PF., Violin, and Cello.«
Op. 77. 6 Sonatinas, PF.41 | Fantasia with 6 var. on the Romance of
Richard Cceur de Lion, PF. ; C.
Op. 78. Etude for PF.. containing 50 exercises of different kinds (in
2 books) (1805). | 6 Bacchanals, PF., with Tambourine ad! lib.
Op. 79. 3 Sonatas, PF. and Flute ; G, F, A.42 1 Grand Sonata, PF.
and Violin obbligato; E.
Op. 80. Grand Sonata, PF., with Violin obbligato; Bb. | Military
Fantasia on • La Sentinelle,' PF. ; C.«
28 Also published as op. 42.
29 The ' admired airs ' are— in no. 1, "Twas within a mile of Edinbro"
town' and ' The Caledonian Beauty' ; in no. 2, 'The Maid of Selma'
and ' Life let us cherish.'
so These appear to have been also published (1) for PF. and Violin,
(2) for PF., Violin, and Cello.
si These last 5 works are suspiciously like the same thing indifferent
disguises.
32 The following airs are introduced— in no. 1, 'If a body meet a
body,' and Sir David Hunter Blair's Reel ; in no. 2, ' Jesse Macphar-
lane ' (sic), and ' La chantreuse.'
33 Also published as op. 65. 34 Also published as op. 63.
35 The second movement of the first Sonata is on a Scotch song, and
the third movement on a Russian theme.
36 'Le'once' was an opera by Isouard, 1805.
37 These appear to have been also published for Flute, both as
op. 73 and as op. 79.
38 • Belisaire ' was an air by Garat. 39 Also published as op. 81.
40 Not, apparently, the same as op. 7.
41 Selections from these six seem to have been also published as
op. 77.
42 See op. 73. 43 • La Sentinelle ' was an air by Choron.
STEIBELT.
Op. 81. 3 Grand Sonatas, PF. ; A, G, E b.i | Grand Sonata, PF. and
Violin obbligato ; Bb.
Op. 82. Grand Martial Sonata, PF. ; D.2 | Grand Fantasia with var.,
PF. ; D.
Op. 83. Grand Sonata, PF., with Violin; E min. I 2 Sonatas, PF. •
C.F.
Op. 84. Grand Sonata, PF., with ace. for Violin or Flute ; G. | 3 So
natas, PF. ; B, G, Eb.
Op. 85. Grand Sonata, PF. ; C. I Grand Sonata, PF. ; D.
Op. 86. 6 Sonatinas, PF.
Op. 87. Grand Sonata, PF. with Violin ; Bb.
Op. 88. Grand Martial Sonata, PF. ; D.3
Op. 89. Grand Sonata, PF. and Flute ; G.
Op. 90. Fantasia en forme de Scene, PF. ; F min; 1 Fantasia en
forme de Scene, PF. ; G.
Op. 91. Sonata, PF. ; C.
Op. 92—100.4
Op. 301. Grand Fantasia ('L'Incendie de Moscou'), PF.
Op. 102. Etrennes aux Dames (Favourite Russian Dance with var.),
PF. ; G.
Op. 103-109.
Op. 110. Fantasia (Battle of Neerwinde), PF. (1792).
WORKS WITHOUT OPUS NUMBERS.
1. VOCAL AND ORCHESTRAL.
Six Operas— ' Rome'o et Juliette,' in 3 acts; produced at Theatre
Feydeau Sept. 10, 1793. | ' Albert and Adelaide,' in 3 acts, an English
opera, not -wholly original, produced at Covent Garden Dec. 11, 1798. |
'La Princesse de Babylone,' in 3 acts. | ' Cendrillon,' in 3 acts. | ' Sar-
gines,' in 3 acts. | 'Le Jugement de Midas,' unfinished, but appa
rently performed.
Five Ballets— 'Le Betour de Zfiphire' (Paris Opera, March 3,1802). |
'Le Jugement du berger Paris' (King's Theatre, London, May 24,
1S04).5 1 'La belle Laitiere, ou Blanche, Heine de Castile' (King's
Theatre. Jan. 26, 1805). | 'La F6te de 1'Empereur' (St. Petersburg,
1?09). | ' Der blode Bitter' (St. Petersburg, before 1812) ; and an Inter
mezzo, ' La F<5te de Mars ' (Paris Opera, March 4, 1806).
Vocal Music.— The 20 Songs of Estelle, with ace. for PF. or Harp.6 |
SO Songs, with ace. for PF. or Harp, in 5 vols., each of 6 songs.
Music for Orchestra.— Ouverture en Symphonic (1796). | Waltzes for
Orch. | Grand Concerto for Harp, with Orch. ace. | Pot-pourri, ar
ranged as Concerto, with ace. for Orch. | 8 Concertos for PF. and
Orch., viz. —
No. 1. In C (1796).
2. In E min., with ace. for Violin or Full Orch. ad lib. (1796?).
3. In E (' The Storm '). Op. 33 or 35 (1798-9).
4. InEb.
5. In E \> (' a la chasse '). Op. 64 (1802).
6. In G min. (' Le Voyage au Mont St. Bernard ') (about 1816).
7. In E min. (Grand Military Concerto, 'dans le Genre des
Grecs,' with 2 Orchestras) (before 1817).
8. In Eb (with Bacchanalian Rondo, ace. by Chorus). (Pro
duced at St. Petersburg March 16, 1820, and played by
Mr. Neate at the London Philharmonic Concert of March
25, 1822.)
2. PIANOFORTE.
I. Fantasias. Of these there are some 30, part with variations,
besides those which have opus-numbers. Amongst them may be
mentioned : —
4 Military Fantasias (the 4th called 'La FSte de Napoleon'), F, E,
C, Eb. 1 Grand Military Fantasia, G. | First Fantasia (on an air from
the 'Mysteres d'Isis'— the ZauberflOte). I Second Fantasia (on an air
from the • Dansomanie ")J | Third Fantasia (on an air from the ' Mys
teres d'Isis.') | Fourth Fantasia (on an air from the same). | Fifth
Fantasia (on an air from the same). | Sixth Fantasia (on the Waltz
from ' Don Giovanni '). | Fantasia with9var. on'LaNouvelleZoeYA.s |
Grand Fantasia with 7 var. on ' La Jeanne.' D.9 | Fantasia with 9 var.
on a Russian Waltz, A min. | Fantasia with 8 var. on Cavatina from
'Tancredi,' Bb. | Fantasia with 5 var. on 'Le Clair de la Lune,' Bb. I
Fantasia with 5 var. on a theme from 'Virtuosi ambulanti,' C.io |
Fantasia (consisting of the airs ' Richard, o mon roi and ' Charmante
Gabrielle") with 8 var. on 'Vive Henri IV,' D. | Fantasia with 8 var.
on Rondo d'Aline'i and an air from 'Maris Galons,' C. I Fantasia
with 10 var. on 'Nel cor piur Bb min. | Fantasia on the air 'Le point
du Jour.' | Fantasia on the air 'Firmin et son chien.' | Fantasia on
the Polonaise 'La placida campagna' and other airs sung by Mme.
Catalan!. | Fantasia, ' L'Orage sur mer,' on the Venetian Barcarole
' La Biondina en Gondoletta' and other airs sung by Mme. Catalani.12 |
Fantasia en forme de Scene, with var. (ded. to Mme. Nariscbkin),
1 Also published as op. 76. . 2 Also published as op. 88.
3 Also published as op. 82.
4 At this point, about the date of Steibelt's arrival in Russia,
almost all record of his works disappears.
5 The original score of this work came into the possession of Mo-
scheles, and was sold by him on leaving London in 1847.
6 Some authorities declare that Steibelt only wrote 5 of this set of
20 songs.
? The ' Dansomanie ' was a ballet, set by Me"hul in 1800 and by Rossi
before 1806.
1 'La Nouvelle Zoe ' was an opera dance.
9 'La Jeanne ' was a dance air.
10 'I Virtuosi ambulanti' was an opera by Fioravanti, 1?07.
11 Apparently from Berton's opera ' Aline,' 1803.
12 This Fantasia has nothing to do with the 3rd PF. Concerto.
STEIBELT.
707
F min." | Fantasia on an air of Mme. Narischkin. | Fantasia en forma
de Scene, with 8 var. on 2 Russian airs, D min. | Fantasia with 6 var..
F. | Fantasia (ded. to Prince Lobkowitz), G. | Fantasia on an air from
the 'Mysteres d'Isis' (ded. to Mme. Moreau), Bb. 1 Fantasia with var.
on the air ' L'on revient toujours' from ' Jocoude,' E.w
n. Rondos. Amongst the vast quantity of these the following may
be particularised :—
15 Rondos in 5 Books : Bk. 1, C, A, E \> ; Bk. 2, D, E b, F ; Ek. 3, D,
C, A ; Bk. 4. G, C, A ; Bk. 5, F, A min., D. | La Bouquet, A. | Turkish
Rondo (with Violin ad lib.). C. | Neapolitan Rondo, F. | Cosack Rondo
(with Violin ad lib.), D. | 2 Scotch Rondos (with Violin ad lib.). | 2
Pastoral Rondos, E, Eb. I Le Berger et son Troupeau. Bb. | Depart
de Paris pour Petersbourg, Bb. I Les Adieux de Bayard a sa Dame, E.
Tink-a-tink (from the duet in ' Blue Beard '), G.is | Bird duet from
' The Cabinet,' D.'e | Polacca from ' The Cabinet.' | Castanet song in
'The Caravan.'Bb.i7 I Favourite Polonaise sung by Mrs. Billington
arr. as a Rondo. | 3 Favourite Rondos (with Flute). | Rondo on a
Swiss Theme, B b.
III. Airs with Variations. Of these there are a very great number.
Amongst the chief may be distinguished:—
10 Sets of Variations (pub. about 1808), No. 1. Air favori de ' Le"once '
(cp. op. 66), D. No. 2. Air du ballet ' Les Noces de Gamache.' No. 3.
Polonaise de Viotti, E b. No. 4. Theme de Haydn. No. 5. Andante
with var. No. 6. Air du petit Commissionaire. No. 7. Theme de
Haydn. No. 8. The"me de Mozart (' Alles fiihlt'). No. 9. Andantino
(' Un jour de cet Automne ') with var. No. 10. Air by Mozart (' Bei
Mannern'). | L'Himne des Marseillois with var. | ' Lullaby' (by Storace)
with var. | Monostatos (ZauberflOte) with var. | Papageno (Zauber
flOte) with var. | Var. on a Russian Theme (with Violin ad lib.). | Ro
mance and Pastorale from ' Nina ' is with 8 var. | Variations on a Song
('A peine au sortir') by Mdhul. | Two Russian Airs ('SchOne Minka'
and 'Kleine Zigeunerin") with var., D min., D. ] Polonaise de Viotti
with var., Bb. | Pastorale and 7 var. (with Violin ad lib.). \ Russian
Air with var. (with Violin ad lib.). \ Air (' And does a fond emotion')
from ' The Cherokee ' 19 with var. | Air Montagnard de Viotti with 8
var,, 0.
IV. Pot-pourris. Of these there is a series of 20. The keys of the
first 7 are F, A, A, Eb. D, D, Eb, and of the 19th, Eb. Nos.l— 16
were published in Paris between 1791 and 1798, and the remainder
shortly after. Besides the piece already mentioned under Orchestral
works, a Caprice-Pot-pourri with var. on an air from ' Alceste ' may
be mentioned.
V. Programme Mutie. As samples of this class may be men
tioned :—
Grande Marche de Bonaparte en Italie (with Tambourine ace.),
1796 (?). | Grande Bataille de Gemappe (with var. on Marseillais),
1796, | Defaite des Espagnols par I'arme'e Fran9aise (Military Sonata),
1797. | Britannia, or Admiral Duncan's Victory, 1797. | St. Paul's Pro
cession, 1798. | La Journe'e d'Ulm (also arranged for Wind Instru
ments), 1806. | The Public Christening of the Neva, Ig06. | See also
opp. 36, 101, and 110.
3. MISCELLANEOUS.
I. Amongst the higher class of music that falls under this head
may be noticed : —
Mtthode de PF. contenant les principes necessaires pour bien
toucher de cet instrument, des gammes dans tous les tons, des exer-
cices pour les doubles cadences, 12 petites le£ons, 6 sonates d'une
difficult^ graduelle, et des grands erercices, le tout doigte", et enfin
une instruction sur la manieres de se servir des pedales, 1805. | 12
Sonatas. PF. (4 hands)— the first 6 in F, G, G, C, Bb, F. | 6 Sonatas for
Harp. | 3 Duets, PF. and Harp. | 6 Duets or Sonatas, 2 PF.s, or PF.
and Harp. | 6 Sonatas for Harp, with ace. for Violin and Cello. | 6
Sonates periodiques (one with Violin or Flute ad lib.), PF. | 3 Pre
ludes, PF. 1 12 Sonatinas in 2 Books— Bk. 1, C, B b, G, D, E b, A ; Bk. 2,
C, G, F, D, Bb, Eb, PF. | 3 Sonatas (for beginners), PF. | Sonata for
Harp with Violin ad lib. \ EWgie (on the death of Marshal Prince
Soltykoff), PF., D min., 1816. | 2 Airs by Braham ('The beautiful
maid' and 'Never think of meeting sorrow') in Reeve's opera 'The
Cabinet1 arranged as a Sonata, PF., Bb. | La Chasse, Sonata, PF.,
with Violin ad lib., D. ' Sonata, PF., with Violin, C min. | Overture
and Rondo, PF. | Overture and Polonaise, PF.
II. The following are among the chief of his lighter works —
12 Bacchanals, PF. (with Tambourine ad lib.). \ 2 Books of Seren
ades, PF. 1 12 Capriccios, PF. | Turkish March, PF. | Marche de Peter-
hof, 1811, PF. Triumphal March on the entry of Alex. I. and Fred.
Will. III. into Paris, 1814, PF. | Le Retour de Cavalerie Russe a St.'
Petersbourg le 14 Oct. 1814, pi6ce militaire, PF. | Le Depart, Im
promptu, PF. ; C. | Caprice on ' Non piu andrai,' PF., 1816. | 6 Nou-
w.lles Walzes a trois mains (the 6th Waltz is a parody of the finale of
the ' Vestale'), PF. | Polonaise, PF. ; D. | Turkish Rondo for Harp
with Violia and Tambourine ad lib. \ Air (' Enfant cheri') with var '
PF. and Harp. | Favourite Rondo for Guitar and Flute or Violin ; D.
In the third book of 'Pandean Music' for the PF., published by
N. Corri of Edinburgh, the first number is ' Air from Blaise et Babet
by Steibelt,' but no single item of information about 'Blaise et
Babet' is forthcoming, except that it does not seem to have been a
piece brought out hi London. f T TT M 1
13 This may be op. 90.
'•4 This was a posthumous work. ' Joconde ' was an opera by
Isouard, 1814. is An opera by Kelly, 1798.
is An opera by Mazzinghi, Reeve, and Braham, 1801.
i? An opera by Reeve, 1803. 18 An opera by Paisiello.
is An opera by Storace, 1791.
Zz2
708
STEIN.
STEIN, a family of pianoforte makers and
players.
i. JOHANN ANDKEAS, the founder of German
pianoforte-making, was born at Heidesheirn in
the Palatinate in 1728. Nothing is known of
his early life, but he appears to have been in
Paris in 1758, and to have remained there for
some years. We may conclude that he was
engaged in organ -building and harpsichord-
making, since he was not only a good musician, but
a proficient in both handicrafts, before he turned
to pianoforte-making. After Paris we find him
at Augsburg, organist of the Barfiisserkirche, the
famous organ of which he built, as well as that of
the Kreuzkirche. When the article PIANOFORTE
was written special enquiries were made in
Vienna and elsewhere, to discover any pianoforte
remaining of Stein's make, but without success.
These enquiries, however, led to the discovery
of a grand piano, which was secured by M. Vic
tor Mahillon, of the Museum of the Conservatoire,
Brussels. It is inscribed
Jean Andre" Stein
Facteur d'orgues et des Clavecins
Orgauiste & 1'Eglise des Minorites
Augsbourg 1780.1
The action of this bichord grand piano is the
same as that in Fig. 10, p. 718, vol. ii. of this
Dictionary, which was copied from a scarce
pamphlet preserved in the Library of the Gesell-
schaft der Musikfreunde at Vienna. The wedge
damper is Cristofori's ; the escapement and other
parts of the action differ entirely from that
maker's and from Gottfried Silbermann's as
preserved in three instruments at Potsdam, in
which the Florentine maker Cristofori is closely
followed. This instrument has also the genou-
illi&re or knee-pedal for raising the dampers,
which preceded the foot-pedal. [See SORDINI.]
The genouilliere and Stein's escapement are de
scribed by Mozart with great gusto in a letter
addressed to his mother, in October 1777, only
a very few years before M. Mahillon's piano was
made. What action was used by Spaeth of
Ratisbon, also referred to by Mozart, we do not
know, but M. Mahillon's recent discovery at
Brussels of a square piano, with the rudiments
of Stein's action — that is, the same centred per
cussion without the hopper escapement — leads
directly to the conclusion that this simple action,
clumsy as Mozart found it without the escape
ment, was in common use before Stein brought his
inventive genius to bear upon its improvement.
Welcker von Gontershausen (' Der Clavierbau,'
Frankfort 1870, p. 173) gives a drawing of this
action without hopper escapement, attributing it
to Silbermann ; but, as far as we can see, without
proof. Many of the early German pianos have
neither date or inscription, which makes the at
tribution to a maker difficult. We are disposed
to think that Silbermann would not have aban
doned the good action of Cristofori, which he
knew how to finish well, for a crude tentative
mechanism ; we therefore conclude that the Seven
Years War having entirely stamped out Saxon
1 The last figure is indistinct, and M. Mahillon thinks that it might
be 5 or 6 instead of 0.
STEIN.
pianoforte-making, a new era began with the
restoration of peace, and that the merit of
founding that German pianoforte-making which
was so long identified with the School of Vienna,
belongs to Stein, whose inventive talent and
artistic devotion were displayed in the good
instruments he made, which, by 1790 at latest,
were adopted as models both in North and South
Germany, as the two grand pianos formerly be
longing to Queen Louise, made by Huhn, ' Organ-
builder' of Berlin,2 and preserved in memory of
her at Potsdam, unmistakeably show.
Gerber, in his Lexicon, has preserved a list of
numerous inventions by Stein ; of which none are
now of value save the escapement and the key
board shifting by means of a pedal. He intro
duced the latter in his ' Saitenharmonica ' in
1789, carrying the hammers from three strings
to one, which he spaced rather away from the
other two unisons. This ' una corda ' he named
' Spinettchen.' Mr. Thayer3 has unearthed a
record of Pastor Junker, showing that Beethoven
in 1791, when residing at Bonn, always used an
instrument of Stein's.
Stein died in 1792, leaving two sons, Mat-
thaus Andreas and Friedrich (see below), and a
daughter, Maria Anna, known as NANETTE, who
in 1794 married Streicher, and was really the
most prominent of the group.
Though Streicher ultimately succeeded to the
business, which had been removed from Augsburg
to Vienna, his name does not appear for several
years in connection with it. [See footnote to
PIANOFORTE, p. 718 a.] The firm as late as 1801
was ' Geschwister Stein ' ; subsequently ' Nannette
Stein ' only, which appears as the maker's name
on a grand pianoforte with six pedals, existing
(1882) in Windsor Castle. For the continuation
of the Stein business see STREICHER. [A.J.H.]
2. MARIA ANNA, or NANETTE STEIN, was born
Jan. 2, 1769, at Augsburg. When barely 8 she
played to Mozart on his visit to Augsburg in
1777, and, in spite of the bad habits she had
contracted, he said of her 'She may do yet, for
she has genius' (Jahn, i. 368). Her talent and
capacity were so obvious that her father early
initiated her into the details of his business, and
on his death, Feb. 29, 1792, she carried it on, in
conjunction with her brother Matthaus Andreas,
with a decision and energy almost masculine.
In 1 793 she married Johann Andreas STREICHER,
an excellent pianist and teacher from Stuttgart,
and then she, her husband, and mother, moved
to Vienna. The new firm of ' Nanette and An
dreas Stein' (constituted by Imperial decree
Jan. 17, 1794) established itself in the house
where it still remains, the ' Eed Rose,' No. 301
in the Landstrasse suburb. In 1812 the factory
was removed to premises of their own, which
had been rebuilt and enlarged some years before,
No. 27 in the Ungargasse. In 1802 the brother
and sister dissolved partnership, each setting up
2 One of these instruments, and apparently the older one, bears no
name outside, but internal examination shows that the maker was
the same who made the 1790 one ; both closely resemble Mozart's
piano by Walther, at Salzburg, and the original model by Stein of
1780. 3 'Beethoven,' i. 209-215.
STEIN.
for themselves, as ' Matthaus Andreas Stein,' and
' Nanette Streicher, geborene Stein/ Streicher,
who had hitherto managed only the commercial
part of the business, now took his full share of
the work. Both firms endeavoured to perfect
their instruments in every possible way,1 while
still adhering to the traditions of their father,
and Stein of Vienna became as celebrated as
Stein of Augsburg had been. In 1823 the
Streichers took into partnership their son Johann
Baptist (born in Vienna 1795). Nanette Strei
cher was at once an energetic and capable
woman of business, a pianist of remarkable ex
cellence, a person of great general cultivation,
and a model wife and mother. Her name is
closely connected with that of Beethoven. It is
well known that she did much to help him in
his domestic arrangements, lightened the burden
of his housekeeping, and even looked after his
bodily health. Thayer, in his ' Beethoven ' (iii.
239)3 gives us a striking picture of their relation
ship, for which the reader must be referred to
that excellent work. [See also vol. i. of this
Dictionary, p. 1906.] Nanette Streicher died
Jan. 16, 1835, and was followed by her husband
on May 25 of the same year. The business is still
carried on by their son, J. B. Streicher. Her
brother,
3. MATTHAUS ANDREAS STEIN, was born at
Augsburg, Dec. 12, 1776, accompanied his sister
to Vienna, set up for himself in 1802, married
Nov. 12, 1796, and died May 6, 1842. His son,
4. KAKL ANDREAS, also a pianoforte-maker and
composer, was born in Vienna Sept. 4, 1797, early
showed talent for music, and became an excellent
pianist and teacher. He was a pupil of Fb'rster
in harmony and composition, and published a
considerable number of works principally for his
instrument. He also left in MS., among others,
two PF. concertos with orchestra, two orchestral
overtures, and a comic opera ' Die goldene Gans,'
words by Langbein. He appeared several times
in public, but latterly devoted himself entirely
to the factory, in the working of which his father
had early initiated him. In 1829 a patent was
granted to him. Karl Andreas travelled much,
and his pianos were appreciated abroad, as well
as by the first artists of his own country. In
1844 he was appointed Court pianoforte maker.
His book ' on the playing, tuning, and preserv
ation of Stein pianofortes,' 2 contains valuable
matter. He died Aug. 28, 1863. [CjF.P.]
5. His uncle, FRIEDBICH, was born at Augsburg
May 26, 1784, and at the age of ten went to
Vienna, and studied counterpoint and composition
with Albrechtsberger. He became one of the
first pianoforte-players of the capital, and was
considered to be a very promising composer. He
appeared rather frequently in the Augarten and
Burgtheater concerts as a player of concertos,
especially those of Mozart. Eeichardt (April I,
1809) calls him: — ' A performer of great power
1 From this period dates the so-called ' Viennese mechanism.' the
principle of which was really the same as that of the Augsburg
pianos.
2 'Kurze Bemerkungen u. d. Spielen, Stimmen, u. Erhalten d.
F. P. etc. Wien. 1801.'
STEINWAY.
709
and genius. ... A rare power, combined with the
deepest feeling, characterised his performance.
He played some of Beethoven's most difficult
pieces, and variations of his own composition,
full of invention and deep sentiment, and of mon
strous difficulty. Since then I have heard him
at home on his magnificent Streicher pianoforte,
and am confirmed in my opinion of his assiduous
study and great talents.' These eulogies are
borne out by other contemporary notices.
Friedrich Stein is the subject of Ries's anecdote
(Notizen, p. 115). Beethoven had played his
Concerto in G at his own concert, Dec. 22, 1808
(see vol. i. p. 187), with astonishing spirit and
speed, and immediately after called upon Hies to
play it in public, with only five days for its study.
Hies naturally shirked such a task, preferring to
play the C minor one instead. At this his master
was offended, and turned to Stein, who accepted
the task, but was unable to accomplish it, and
played the C minor instead, not satisfactorily.
This anecdote, which has kept Stein's name alive,
leaves unintentionally a false impression as to his
powers. Hies would have played the C minor
Concerto better ; for he had carefully studied it
under Beethoven himself, and was then in his full
strength. Stein had had no such instruction,
and was forced to play it with little practice,
when so far gone in consumption that he died
four months later.
Stein was an industrious composer, but few of
his vocal compositions reached the stage. He left
3 operettas and a ballet, of which only one —
'Die F£e radian te'— came to public performance.
Also a set of Songs, a Violin Concerto, a Grand
Sonata for the PF., and a PF. Trio. He also
arranged Beethoven's 4th and 6th Symphonies,
and most of Mozart's and Cherubini's Overtures,
for two PFs.
His widow, CAROLINE, daughter of a Vienna
official named Haar, was also a very fine pianiste.
Like her husband, she depended upon teaching
for her subsistence. [A.W.T.]
STEINWAY AND SONS, an eminent firm
of pianoforte makers in New York, distinguished
by the merit of their instruments and by their
commercial enterprise, which, in comparatively
few years, have placed their firm in equal rank
with those famous older makers in Europe whose
achievements in the improvement and develop
ment of the instrument have become historical.
Henry Engelhard Steinway (originally STEIN-
WEG) was born February 15, 1 797, at Wolfshagen,
in the Duchy of Brunswick. The youngest of a
family of twelve, at the early age of 15 he was
the sole survivor of his family. From the age
of 17 to 21 he served in the army, and during
that time his natural taste for music led him
to learn the zither. On his discharge, which
was honourably obtained, from the army, he
thought of becoming a cabinet-maker, but was
too old to serve the five years apprenticeship and
five years as journeyman which the guild required
prior to his becoming a master. He therefore
went for a year to an irregular master, and then
turned to organ-building, which was free from
710
STEINWAY.
the narrow limits of a guild. Circumstances
however, allowed him in 1825 to marry and
settle as a cabinet-maker at Seesen, near the
Hartz mountains, where he had been already
working; and in that year (Nov. 25) his eldest
son Theodore was born. Steiuway in a few years
turned his attention to piano-making, and in
1839 exhibited a grand and two square pianos at
the State Fair of Brunswick, Seesen being in
Hanoverian territory, the foundation of the
Prussian ' Zollverein ' in 1845 brought Stein-
way's hitherto flourishing bvisiness to a stand
still, and the revolution of 1848 destroyed it
entirely. The course of events now induced
Steinway to leave Germany, and in April 1849
he emigrated to New York, whither his family,
with the exception of Theodore, the eldest son,
followed him the next year. For three years the
father and the three sons, Charles, Henry, and
William, worked in different New York piano
factories. In March 1853 they agreed to unite
and start in business on their own account, and
the firm of ' Steinway & Sons ' was established.
In 1855 they exhibited a square piano in which
the American iron frame principle of a single
casting was combined with a cross or over
strung scale, forming the foundation of the so-
called 'Steinway system,' which, as applied to
grand pianos, attracted great attention in the
London International Exhibition of 1862. Both
Charles and Henry Steinway dying in 1865,
Theodore, the eldest son, disposed of his business
in Brunswick and became a partner of the New
York firm. Their spacious concert-room there
was built and opened in 1866. About this time
the Steinways began to make upright pianos, and
their instruments of all kinds shown at Paris in
the Universal Exhibition of 1867, not only gained
them success, but became models for Germany,
to the great improvement of the German make
and trade. Henry Steinway, the father, died in
1871. We may quote from the New York En-
cyclopjedia of Contemporary Biography the sum
mary of his life : ' By virtue of his abilities and
his inborn strength of character, he, an orphan
boy, became one of the greatest manufacturers
in his special industry, not only of his own
country, but of the world.' Theodore and William
Steinway are now (1882) the senior partners of
the firm. In 1875 they opened a branch of their
business in London, to which a concert-room is
attached, and in 1880 another branch establish
ment at Hamburg. [A.J.H.]
STEINWEG, the original of STEINWAY (Gro-
tian, Helfferieh, Schulz, TH. STEINWEGS NACH-
FOLGER). This firm of pianoforte-makers in
Brunswick succeeded, as the style implies, to Mr.
Theodor Steinweg or Steinway, when he retired,
in 1865, from the business founded by his father,
to join the New York firm of Steinway & Sons, of
which, being the eldest brother, he has become the
senior partner. Soon after the Steinway system
of construction was brought out in America, he
introduced it in Germany, and in the season of
1 8 60- 1 his concert instruments, made on that
principle, were publicly used. His successors in
STEPHENS.
Brunswick have maintained the good reputation
he founded for these instruments, which are
favoured with the preference of some eminent
pianists ; notably of Madame Schumann, who
since 1870 has used them exclusively in Germany
for her public performances. Although the
present firm preserve the Steinway model in the
main, they claim to have made deviations and
alterations, particularly in the action, that give
the instruments of 'Th. Stein wegs Nachfolger'
their own cachet. [A.J.H.]
STEPHENS, CATHERINE, born in London
Sept. 1 8, 1794, having given early indications of
aptitude for music, was in 1807 placed under
the instruction of Gesualdo Lanza, whose pupil
she remained for some years. Early in 1812 she
appeared in subordinate parts at the Pantheon
as a member of an Italian Opera Company. Soon
afterwards her father, dissatisfied with the ap
parently small progress she made under Lanza,
placed her under the tuition of Thomas Welsh.
On Sept. 23, 1813, she appeared anonymously
at Co vent Garden as Mandane in 'Artaxerxes'
with decided success. She repeated the part on
Sept. 28, as 'Miss Stevens,' and on Sept. 30, under
her proper name. She soon afterwards performed
Polly in ' The Beggar's Opera,' Eosetta in ' Love
in a Village,' and Clara in 'The Duenna,' in each
gaining ground in public favour. Her success
occasioned an animated controversy between her
two instructors as to which of them could claim
the credit of having really developed her abili
ties. In March 1814 she was engaged at the
Concert of Ancient Music, where she was at
once allotted all the principal soprano songs,
and later in the year she sang at the festivals
at Norwich and Birmingham. She continued
at Covent Garden until 1822, when she broke
with the managers on a question of terms and
transferred her services to Drury Lane. She
occupied the principal position on the English
operatic stage, at the first concerts, and the festi
vals, until 1 835, when she retired into private life.
Her voice was a pure soprano, rich, full, and
powerful, and of extensive compass, and her
execution neat, although not very remarkable for
brilliancy. She somewhat lacked dramatic in
stinct and power, and her enunciation was very
bad, but she excelled in the expression of quiet
devotional feeling and simple pathos. In such
songs as Handel's 'Angels, ever bright and
fair,' and 'If guiltless blood,' and in ballads like
'Auld Robin Gray,' and 'Savourneen Deelish,1
she captivated every hearer. On March 14, 1838,
she was married to the widowed octogenarian
Earl of Essex in his house No. 9 Belgrave Square,1
and on April 23, 1839, became his widow. She
i In the Parish Register of St. George, Hanover Square, the mar
riage was originally entered as having been celebrated in 'the Parish
Church.' Those last three -words were, however, subsequently erased
(in two places) with a sharp instrument, and '9 Belgrave Square'
written upon the erasures, but without any note, or authentication,
of the alteration being made in the Register. The original entry is
proved by the words 'the Parish Church ' remaining unaltered in the
certified copy of the register at Somerset House, until March 1882,
when the discrepancy was pointed out by the present writer, and
measures taken for its correction. It is to be hoped that this is a
solitary instance of so flagrant a violation of the directions of the
Act of Parliament as to the mode in which erroneous entries in
Registers are to be rectified.
STEPHENS.
survived him for nearly 43 years, dying in
the house in which she was married, Feb. 22,
l882- [W.H.H.]
STEPHENS, CHARLES EDWARD, nephew of
the preceding, was born in the Edgeware Eoad,
March 18, 1821. Displaying early tokens of
musical organisation, he was placed under
Cipriani Potter for pianoforte, J. A. Hamilton
for harmony, counterpoint, and composition, and
Henry Blagrove for the violin. In 1843 he was
elected organist of St. Mark's, Myddelton Square,
and subsequently held the same office at Trinity
Church, Paddington, 1846, St. John's, Hampstead
1856, St. Mark's, St. John's Wood, 1862-65, St.
Clement Danes, 1864-69, and St. Saviour's, Pad
dington, 1872-75. In 1850 he was elected an
associate, and in 1857 a member of the Phil
harmonic Society, of which he has repeatedly
been chosen a director. In 1865 ne was elected
a Fellow of the College of Organists, in 1870 an
honorary member of the Royal Academy of
Music, and in 1877 a licentiate, honoris causd,
of Trinity College, London. His first important
composition was a trio for pianoforte, violin and
violoncello, produced at the Society of British
Musicians, himself performing the pianoforte
part, and he afterwards produced a symphony
and several concert overtures of great merit,
No. 4 of which, ' A Dream of happiness/ was
played at the Crystal Palace, Nov. 13, 1875. He
has also composed many works for pianoforte
and organ, and much vocal music, comprising
anthems and services, songs, ballads, part-songs,
etc. His part-song, ' Come, fill ye right merrily,'
gained the prize given by Mr. Henry Leslie's
Choir in 1858, and in April 1879 he was
awarded both the first and second prizes given
by Trinity College, London, for the best string
quartet. Although an able pianist, he has, for
some years past, rarely appeared in public, having
devoted himself almost exclusively to teaching,
in which he is much esteemed. [W.H.H.J
STEPHENS, JOHN, Mus. Doc., educated as
a chorister in Gloucester Cathedral, in 1 746 suc
ceeded Edward Thomson as organist of Salisbury
Cathedral. He graduated as Mus. Doc. at Cam
bridge in 1763, conducted the Gloucester Festival
in 1766, and died Dec. 15, 1780. A volume of
' Cathedral Music ' by him, edited by Highmore
Skeats, was published in 1805. [W.H.H.]
STERKEL, JOHANN FRANZ XAVER (some
times styled Abb£ Sterkel), born at Wurzburg,
Dec. 3, 1 750, was a distinguished amateur. Though
music formed a part of his education it was only
a part. He went through his college course at
Wurzburg university, took orders, and became
vicar and organist of Neumiinster. In 1 778 he was
called to the court of the Elector of Mayence at
Aschaffenburg as chaplain and pianist. Next year
the Elector sent him on a journey through Italy;
success attended him everywhere, and at Naples
he brought out an opera, ' Farnace,' with e'clat. In
1781 he returned to Mayence and was promoted
to a canonry. All this time he was composing
as well as playing in all departments of music.
STERLING.
711
He wrote about this date some German songs
which were great favourites, and he formed some
excellent pupils — among composers Hofmann
and Zulehner, among singers Griinbaum and
Kirschbaum. In September 1791 occurred the
great musical event of Sterkel's life, though he
probably did not know its significance — his
meeting with Beethoven, then a youth of twenty.
Beethoven came to Aschaffenburg with the band
of the Elector of Bonn, and was taken by Ries
and Simrock to call on the great player, whose
reputation was something like that of Liszt at
the present day. Sterkel was the first great
executant that Beethoven had heard, and the
extreme refinement and finish of his style evi
dently struck him much. He watched him with
the closest attention, and not unnaturally de
clined to play in his turn, till Sterkel induced
him to do so by speaking of his 24 variations on
Righini's ' Venni Amore.' They had been pub
lished only a few months previously, and Sterkel
declared that they were so hard that he did
not believe even the composer could play them.
Beethoven played what he could recollect, and
improvised others fully equalling the originals
in difficulty — but the curious thing was that
he adopted Sterkel's delicate style all through.
They do not appear to have met again. In 1 793
Sterkel succeeded Righini as Capellmeister to
the Elector, and this threw him still more into
serious composition, but the French war forced
the Elector to leave Mayence, and his Capell
meister returned to Wurzburg. In 1805 he
became Capellmeister at Ratisbon, where all his
old energy revived, and he taught and composed
with the greatest vigour and success. The war
of 1813 at length drove him back from Ratisbon
to Wurzburg, and there he died Oct. 21, 1817.
The list of Sterkel's published compositions is
immense. It embraces 10 symphonies ; 2 over
tures ; a stringed quintet ; 6 string trios ; 6 do.
duos ; 6 PF. concertos ; a very large number of
sonatas for PF. both for 2 and 4 hands ; varia
tions, and minor pieces; 10 collections of songs
for voice and PF.; Italian canzonets, duets, etc.
The number of editions which some of these
went through, shows how widely popular Sterkel
was in his day. [G.]
STERLING, ANTOINETTE, born Jan.23,i85o(?)
at Sterlingville, in the State of New York,
though American by birth and parentage is of
English extraction, tracing her descent through
William Bradford, one of the Pilgrim Fathers
who crossed in 'The Mayflower,' and was the
second Governor of Plymouth Colony, from the
family of John Bradford, martyr, burnt in 1555.
She possessed, even in childhood, a voice of
extraordinary range, which afterwards settled
into a contralto of great richness and volume,
with a compass from Eb in the Bass stave to the
top F in the Treble one. Her first serious study
of singing began in 1867 in New York under
Signer Abella, better known as the husband of
Mme. d'Angri. She came to England in 1868
and remained a few months, singing chiefly in
the provinces, en route for Germany. There she
712
STERLING.
was first a pupil of Mme. Marches! at Cologne ;
then of Pauline Viardot at Baden Baden, and
lastly of Manuel Garcia in London. She returned
to America in 1871, and soon took a high position
as a concert singer. On May 13, 1873, she took
leave of her native country in a concert at the
Irving Hall, Boston, arrived in England, and made
her first appearance on Nov. 5 at the Covent
Garden Promenade Concert, under the conductor-
ship of Sir Julius Benedict. At the Crystal
Palace she first sang on Dec. 6, and shortly after
appeared at the Saturday Popular, Feb. 21, 1874,
Sacred Harmonic, Philharmonic, Albert Hall
and London Ballad Concerts. At Gloucester, in
the following September, she sang at the Festival.
She was married on Easter Sunday 1875, at the
Savoy Chapel, to Mr. John MacKinlay; and
since then, excepting a few months in that year,
when she sang in America in a series of 40 con
certs under Theodox'e Thomas, has resided in
London, and is one of the best known and most
popular singers there.
Mme. Sterling is not unknown in classical
music. On her first arrival here she sang the
Cradle Song from Bach's Christmas Oratorio with
much effect, and her repertoire contains songs of
Mendelssohn and Schumann. But she is essen
tially a ballad singer. Her voice is one of great
beauty and attractiveness ; but it is her earnest
ness and intention, the force which she throws
into the story — especially if it be weird or grim,
such as ' The three fishers,' ' The sands of Dee,'
or ' The three ravens ' — and, probably more than
all, the distinctness with which she declaims the
words, whether they be German or English, that
form the real secret of her success. [G.]
STERN, JULIUS, was born at Breslau, Aug. 8,
1820, but removed at an early age to Berlin,
where he learned music under Maurer, Ganz,
and Rungenhagen, at the Singakademie and the
Royal Academy of Arts, and soon began to
compose. ' Please enquire about Mr. Julius
Stern of Berlin,' says Mendelssohn,1 ' who has
sent me a book of songs with a kind note. From
the first glance I think they show talent, but I
have not seen or heard anything else about him.1
In 1843 he received a travelling scholarship from
the King, which led him, first to Dresden for the
special study of singing, and then to Paris, where
he soon became known as conductor of the Ger
man 'Gesangverein.' Here he performed the
Antigone, first in the studio of Henry Lehmann
the painter,2 and then at the Ode'on theatre, which
drew from Mendelssohn a very characteristic
letter (May 27, 1844). In 1846 he returned to
Berlin, and in 1847 founded the well-known
Singing Society which bore his name. The first
performance of 'Elijah' in Oct. 1847, gave a
specimen of the powers of the new association,
and the level has since been fully maintained
by performances of a very wide range of works
both ancient and modern. In 1872 the Society
celebrated its 25th anniversary, amid an enthu
siasm which conclusively showed how wide and
Mendelssohn Family, il. 57.
2 Ibid, 295.
STEVENSON.
deep was the public feeling. In 1874 ill-health
obliged Stern to retire from the conductorship,
and he was succeeded by STOCKHAUSEN.
Meantime, in 1850, withKullak and Marx, he
had founded his Conservatorium, which, notwith
standing the defection of his two colleagues, still
flourishes and has educated many good musicians.
From 1869 to 71 he conducted the Berlin 'Sin-
fonie-Kapelle,' and at Christmas 1873 undertook
the Reichshall Concerts, which however were not
commercially successful, and only lasted for two
seasons. He then confined himself to his Conser
vatorium till his death, Feb. 27, 1883. Stern has
published many vocal pieces and arrangements,
but his most enduring work will probably be his
edition of Exercises by Vaccai (Bote & Bock),
Crescentini (Peters), etc. He was made a ' Ko-
nigliche Musikdirector' in 1849, and 'Konigliche
Professor' in 1860. [G.]
STEVENS, RICHAED JOHN SAMUEL, born in
London in 1757, was educated in St. Paul's
Cathedral choir under Richard Savage. He dis
tinguished himself as a glee composer, and ob
tained prizes from the Catch Club for his glees,
'See, what horrid tempests rise,' 1782, and 'It
was a lover and his lass,' 1786. He was ap
pointed organist of the Temple Church, 1786,
organist of the Charter House, 1796 (retain
ing his appointment at the Temple), and on
March 17, 1801, was elected Professor of Music
in Gresham College. He published three sets of
glees and some songs. Nine glees and a catch by
him are included in Warren's collections. Among
his best glees may be mentioned ' Ye spotted
snakes/ 'Blow, blow, thou winter wind,' 'Crabbed
age and youth,' 'Sigh no more, ladies,' 'The
cloud-capt towers,' ' From Oberon in fairy land,'
' Some of my heroes are low,' ' Prithee, foolish
boy,' 'To be gazing on those charms,' and 'Strike
the harp in the praise of Bragela,' all of which
still retain their popularity with lovers of that
class of composition. He edited ' Sacred Music
for one, two, three and four voices, from the
works of the most esteemed composers, Italian and
English,' an excellent collection in 3 vols. fol. He
died Sept. 23, 1837. [W.H.H.]
STEVENSON, SIB JOHN ANDREW, Knight,
Mus. Doc., son of John Stevenson, a violinist in
the State Band in Dublin, was born in Dublin
about 1762. In 1773 he was admitted a chorister
of St. Patrick's and Christ Church Cathedrals,
Dublin, and continued so until 1779. He after
wards became a vicar choral of both cathedrals,
and a member of the choir of Trinity College,
Dublin. He composed new music to O'Keeffe's
farces, ' The Son-in-Law ' and ' The Agreeable
Surprise,' to enable them to be performed in
Dublin, and also composed for the Irish stage
the operas of 'The Contract,' 1783 ; 'Love in a
blaze,' 1800 ; ' The Patriot,' and 'The Burning
of Moscow.' He obtained his Mus. Doc. degree
at Dublin in 1791, and his knighthood from the
Lord Lieutenant (Lord Hardwicke), in 1803.
He composed some Services and Anthems (a
collection of which he published, with his por-
STEVENSON.
trait prefixed, in 1825), 'Thanksgiving,' an
oratorio, and numerous glees, duets, songs, etc.
But the work by which he is best known is the
symphonies and accompaniments to the collection
of Irish Melodies, the words for which were
written by Thomas Moore. He died Sept. 14,
1833- [W.H.H.]
STEWART, SIR ROBERT PRESCOTT, Knight,
Mus. Doc., son of Charles Frederick Stewart,
librarian of the King's Inns, Dublin, was born in
Dublin, Dec. 1 6, 1825. He was educated as a
chorister of Christ Church Cathedral, Dublin, of
which he was appointed organist at the early
age of 1 8. In 1844 he was appointed organist
of Trinity College, Dublin. In 1846 he became
conductor of the University of Dublin Choral
Society, the members of which defrayed the
expenses of the performance of his music for
degrees of Mus. Bac. and Mus. Doc., which
took place in 1851, besides presenting him with
his graduate's robes and a jewelled baton. In
1852 he became a vicar-choral of St. Patrick's
Cathedral, and in 1861 was appointed Professor
of Music in the University of Dublin. He was
chosen to represent Ireland at the great Peace
Festival held at Boston (U.S. A.) in 1872, on
which occasion he composed a fantasia on Irish
airs for orchestra, organ, and chorus. Upon his
return from America he was knighted by the
Lord Lieutenant (Earl Spencer). In 1873 ^e
was appointed conductor of the Dublin Philhar
monic. Amongst Sir Robert Stewart's many
compositions, his glees deserve particular mention.
In this branch of bis art he has won numerous
prizes and well-merited renown. His more im
portant works include an ode for the opening of
the Cork Exhibition of 1852 ; 'Ode on Shake
speare,' produced at the Birmingham Festival
1870; a 'Church Hymnal,' which has passed
through three editions ; and two Cantatas, ' A
Winter Night's Wake' and 'The Eve of S. John.'
Sir Robert Stewart enjoys a high reputation as
an organist ; his playing at the Great Exhibi
tion of 1851 and that at Manchester in 1857 ex
cited general admiration. As occupant of the
Dublin chair of music, his excellent lectures and
writings on music bear evidence to his wide
culture and literary skill, as well as to his high
musical attainments. His musical memory is
remarkable. [W.H.H.]
STIASTNY, BERNARD WENZEL, violoncellist,
born at Prague in 1770. Little is known of him
except that he was probably professor at the
Conversatoire, to which he dedicated his work on
the violoncello. It is remarkable for what may
be almost called a treatise on the accompaniment
of recitative as it was then practised, and which
our own Lindley brought to such perfection as
will probably never be heard again. He dedicates
no less than 30 pages to this subject, of which
29 consist of examples of all the forms and
harmonies then in use. He has however strangely
omitted to figure the bass.
STIASTNY, JEAN, brother of the above, born at
Prague in 1774. We know scarcely anything of
STIASTNY.
713
his career. He seems to have studied harmony
and the violoncello at Prague, under his brother,
but he must have soon left that city as he is
described on the title of his op. 3 as ' Violoncello
de S.A.R. le Grand Due de Frankfort.' Accord
ing to Fetis he was musical director at Nurem
berg in 1820, and from thence went to Mannheim.
He is known to have been in London, and he
dedicated two of his finest compositions to Lindley
and Crosdill, as well as his three duets op. 8 to Sir
W. Curtis. His last and perhaps finest work was
also published and probably written in London.
He was also in Paris when he arranged his op. 1 1
for cello and piano, and he also dedicated his
op. 3 to the pupils of the Conservatoire. There
exists a beautiful French edition of his six grand
duets op. i, and also of his two sonatas op. 2, the
latter in score. I beard from one who knew him
that he was nervous and diffident in the highest
degree, and this may account for his having left
no mark or record of himself as a performer.
But his compositions for the violoncello must
render his name immortal, for though the list of
his works only amount to 13, the originality and
purity of them all entitle him to rank among the
very first writers for the instrument. He is
often called the Beethoven of the violoncello, nor
can that be considered too high praise. A list of
his works follows : — •
Op. 1. 6 grand duets for 2 cellos, dedicated to his brother.
Op. 2. 2 sonatas for cello solo with accompaniment for a 2nd cello.
Op. 3. Divertissement for cello solo with accompaniments for tenor
and 2nd cello.
Op. 4. 12 ' Petites pieces pour violoncelle et basse a Vusage de com-
men9ants.'
Op. 5. 6 pieces faciles for cello and bass.
Op. 6. 3 grand duets for 2 cellos.
Op. 7. Concertino for cello with accompaniments for flute, 2tenors,
cello, and contrabass, dedicated to Lindley, who said it was the finest
piece ever written for the instrument. Plajed by the late Mr. Han
cock.
Op. 8. 3 duets for 2 cellos.
Op. 9. 6 pieces faciles for cello and bass.
Op. 10. Andante with variations for cello solo with accompaniments
for flute, 2 violins, tenor, and cello, dedicated to Crosdill.
Op. 11. 6 solos for cello and bass.
Op. 12. Theme with variations and rondo with quartet accompani
ment.
Op. 13. Grand trio for cello solo with accompaniment for tenor and
2nd cello, published in London by Welsh & Hawes, but unknown on
the Continent. The finale, a rondo in 6-8 begins as follows : —
Cello Solo.
A 'W — U -
i *
V \ •
K\\° Q
ISI> M
*^ W
Viola. .^^
•• I i L/ 1 1 «4 •»< 0 ,
j 1 1" "1
r "i i Pn
fUj [> • o ' ' 1* »
•
Pizz.
5
£L
""N. sS~
'• • *T (j I"""1
2
— ^ _ — -
^±1in fa---
~~i •
L--, •
— «F^
1 1
Sir*
^
r i i
714
STIASTNY.
STIGELLI.
— P-OP — * — •-
~TT* — S
5^S
f '«•
— «— 1 — *-
^— »—
— 1—
T 1 ^ p * 1
— =i — r i
-F =1 1 — l-tf—
«~^rr
P~i — i rl~~
^s.
J^^_ —
p ~^=t •
==**J
r^
/'fez.
=Z3-
p
-^— =1—
-=1-=I-
Arco
r
•F-' - :
L-^-J •
-=)— p-
etc.
etc.
etc.
[G.H.]
STICH, JOHANN WENZEL, known as PDNTO,
eminent horn-player, born about 1 755 in Bohemia.
Was taught music and the French-horn by
Matiegka and Hampel of Dresden, at the ex
pense of Count Thun. On his return to the
Count's household he considered himself ill-
treated, took offence, and ran away with some of
his comrades. To avoid recognition he Italianized
his name to Punto, and travelled in Germany and
France, settling for a time in Wurzburg, Treves,
Coblenz, Paris, etc., and attracting considerable
attention. In Paris he made the acquaintance
of Mozart, who composed for him a Sinfonie cou-
certante for flute, oboe, horn, and bassoon, never
played and now unfortunately lost. 'Punto plays
magnificently ' (blast mngnifique) writes Mozart
to his father. In 1 788 he was engaged by Mara
(with Graff, Fischer, and Florio) for her concerts
at the Pantheon, London (?). In Vienna, Bee-
thoven composed his sonata for PF. and horn
(op. 17) ibr him, and they played it together
without rehearsal, at Punto's concert, April 18,
1800. It was received enthusiastically, and at
once encored. After this Punto made another
tour with Dussek, returned to Prague and gave
a concert at the theatre there in 1801. He died
after a long illness Feb. 16, 1803, and his epitaph
runs
Omne tulit punctum Punto, cui Musa Bohema
Ut plausit vivo, sic morienti gemit.
His compositions were published in Paris by
Sieber, Nadermann, Cochet, Imbault, Le Due,
and Pleyel. [C.F.P.]
STIEHL, HETNRICH, born at Liibeck, Aug. 5,
1829, second son of T. D. Stiehl, an esteemed
organist there. He studied at Liibeck and Weimar,
and at Leipzig under Moscheles, Gade,and Haupt-
mann. In 1853 he settled in St. Petersburg as
organist to the St. Peter's Church, and Director
of the Sing-Akademie. In 1867 he moved to
Vienna, and after staying there two years went
on to Italy. In 1872 and 1873 he was in London,
and from Oct. 1874 to 1877 resided in Belfast
as conductor of the Philharmonic Society and
founder of the Cecilia Society there. He then
returned to London, and in 1880 was called to
Reval in Russia, where he holds the leading
position as professor of music, organist, and con
ductor of the Musical Society of the town, in
which he is indefatigable and most successful in
the revival, practice, and performance of the best
music, and is universally liked and esteemed.
He gave an excellent performance of Bach's Mat
thew-Passion (the first in Russia) on March 17,
1883, and repeated it at St. Petersburg April 6.
Stiehl's compositions are numerous. A little
orchestral piece called 'The Vision' was produced
at the Crystal Palace, April 12, 1873, and was
much applauded for its delicate fanciful character.
A ' Hexentanz,' ' Ungarisch,' Waltzes, and a Ga
votte are also well known in Germany. He has
published 3 PF. Trios, a Sonata for PF. and
Cello, Sonata quasi Fantasia for PF. solo, and
many others, the latest being ' Mosaik ' for the
Pianoforte, op. 161. [&•]
STIFELLIO. An opera in 3 acts; libretto
by Piave from a play of Emile Souvestre's, music
by Verdi. Produced at the Teatro Grande,
Trieste, Nov. 16, 1850. Not being successful,
Verdi revised it throughout and adapted it to
the libretto of ' Aroldo,' also by Piave, which was
produced at the Teatro Nuovo, Rimini, Aug. 16,
1857, arid was equally unsuccessful. [G.]
STIGELLI, or STIGHELLI, GEOBG. His
real name was STIEGELE, and he was born at
Ingstetten, Wiirtemberg, in 1819. He was edu
cated for the law, but his voice was so promising
that he gave that up and devoted himself to
music, which he studied in Stuttgart, Paris, and
Milan. His early career was spent in Italy,
where he had great success at the Scala at
Milan, and elsewhere. In 1848 he returned to
Germany, and settled at Frankfort as singer and
teacher. In 1 849 and 50 he was in London, and
STIGELLI.
sang at concerts with such success that in 1851 he
was engaged at the Royal Italian Opera, Covent
Garden, where he first appeared, replacing Signer
Mario as Kainbaldo in 'Koberto' on April 24;
and with that brilliant company he remained as
a second tenor, doing thoroughly good work,
and meeting with success, both in opera and at
concerts, till 1854, after which his name dis
appears from the lists.
In 1861 he was singing at the Court Opera,
Vienna, and in 1866 a tenor named Stiegele sang
at the Mainz Theatre, who was probably the
same person. He was favourably known as a
writer of songs of a popular cast with much
graceful melody. [G-.]
STIRLING, ELIZABETH, an eminent English
organist and composer ; born at Greenwich, Feb.
26, 1819; learned the organ and piano from
Mr. W. B. Wilson and Edward Holmes, and
harmony from J. A. Hamilton and Prof. Mac-
farren. She attained a remarkable degree of
, o
execution on the organ pedals, as may be in
ferred from her first public performance, given
at S. Katherine's Church, Regent's Park, when,
out of 14 numbers, the programme contained
5 pedal fugues and preludes by J. S. Bach ;
3 pedal trios, and other pieces, by the same
master, etc. In Nov. 1839 she was elected
organist of All Saints', Poplar, which she re
tained till Sept. 1858, when she gained the same
post at S. Andrew's, Undershaft, by competition.
This she resigned in 1880. In 1856 she sub
mitted an exercise (Ps. cxxx. for 5 voices and
orchestra) for the degree of Mus. Bac. Oxon. ;
but though accepted it was not performed, owing
to the want of power to grant a degree to a
lady. Miss Stirling has published some original
pedal fugues and slow movements, and other
pieces for her instrument, as well as arrange
ments from the works of Handel, Bach, and
Mozart. Also songs and duets, and many part-
songs for 4 voices, of which a well-established
favourite is ' All among the barley.' In 1863 she
married Mr. J. A. Bridge. [G.]
STOCKHAUSEN, MADAME, was born Mar-
gavethe Schmuck, at Gebweiler in 1803, and
trained in Paris as a concert-singer by Cartruffo.
She became the wife of the harpist and composer
Franz Stockhausen, and the mother of the singer
Julius Stockhausen. Husband and wife travelled,
giving not very remunerative concerts in Switzer
land (1825). Paris was visited later, but Mine.
Stockhausen's greatest successes attended her in
England, where she was induced to return almost
every year from 1828 to 1840, .singing at some
of the concerts of the Philharmonic and Vocal
Societies, and also taking part in the principal
private and benefit concerts. She had little or no
dramatic feeling, but as she gained in power she
grew in public favour, and came to be recognised
as a true musician and an accomplished singer
of Swiss airs (with or without the ' jodel' burden),
and also, and especially, those of Mozart, Spohr,
Handel and Haydn. Mme. Sfcockhausen was
frequently engaged at provincial festivals, and
her delivery of fche music of Mary in Spohr's
STOCKHAUSEN.
715
' Calvary,' evoked special praise among her ora
torio parts. The Earl of Mount-Edgecumbe, in
his criticism of the Musical Festival in West
minster Abbey, 1834, n°tes the ' science and skill
which enabled her always to sing well.'
Mine. Stockhausen's voice is described by
Henry Phillips as ' a clear, high soprano, the
upper part of her register being unusually sweet
and liquid, qualities which she rarely missed the
opportunity of exhibiting, for she almost always
terminated her songs on the highest octave.1
A few years after her farewell appearance in
London, a home was made in Colmar, whither
the Stockhausens retired to devote themselves
to the education of their six children. Up to
1849 Mme. Stockhausen was heard with her son
at local concerts; she left Alsace only occasionally
to appear in public, and in her last visit to Paris
(1849) ner singing showed a great falling off.
She died in 1877, nearly ten years after her
husband, much regretted by her many English
friends. [L.M.M.]
STOCKHAUSEN, JULIUS, son of the fore
going, one of the most remarkable singers of our
time, was born at Paris, July 22, 1826. His gifts
showed themselves early, and his mother was
accustomed to say that he could sing before he
could speak. He and his younger brother Edward
(who died early) accompanied their parents on a
concert tour to England, and learnt there to sing
Bishop's duet 'Where are you going, sweet sister
Fay ?' In 1833 Julius was placed at a school at
Gebweiler in Alsace, where he remained till 1840,
with a view to the clerical profession. But such
intentions were dispelled by the violent turn for
music which asserted itself after a concert at
Basle in 1842, at which Mine. Stockhausen
made her last appearance. He took a prominent
part in the concerts at Gebweiler as singer, ac-
companyist, violin-player, and even drummer.
In 1844 he moved to the seminary of Strasburg,
and there his performances on the cello and
organ sealed his fate as a priest. In 1845 and
1846 he visited Paris with his father, took les-
sons in the piano from Charles Halle and Sta-
maty, and in singing from Emanuel Garcia, and
entered thoroughly into the abundant musical
life of the French capital, to the great advantage
of his musical education. His devotion to the
profession of music was however not absolutely
decided till 1848, when, at the invitation of
Ernst Reiter, the conductor, he suddenly took the
part of Elijah in a performance of that oratorio
at Basle. His success decided his future course,
and he at once threw himself energetically into
the art, and for the next few years travelled in.
all directions, singing at innumerable concerts
Schubert's Schone Miillerin and other songs. In
1849 he came to England, renewed his lessons
with Gar"cia and sang at various concerts. In
1851 he returned, and sang three times at the
Philharmonic, April 7 in the Choral Symphony,
April 28 in two trios, and June 9 in a scena from
Boieldieu's ' Chaperon Rouge.' Taste in England
was not then sufficiently advanced to call for the
Lieder just mentioned. To these, at the instance
716
STOCKHAUSEN.
of Schroder-Devrient, he shortly added Schu
mann's 'Dichterliebe' and others. His first ap
pearance on the stage seems to have been at
Mannheim in 1852, 53, and he joined the Opera
Comique at Paris in 1857-59, supporting such
parts as the Seneschal in ' Jean de Paris.' A t this
time he became much lie with Ary Scheffer ; and
•with Mme. Viardot, Berlioz, Duprez, St. Saens,
and others, formed one of the circle by whom
much German music was performed in the studio
of the great painter.
1859 to 62 were occupied in more concert
tours, and it was during this time at Leipzig and
Cologne that he first attempted Schumann's
Faust music. In 1862 he came to an anchor
at Hamburg as Director of the Philharmonic
Concerts and of the Singakademie, a position
which he retained till 1869, when he was made
Kammersinger to the King of Wurtemberg at
Stuttgart with a salary of 2000 gulden, residing
at Canstatt. During all this time he took many
concert tours, especially with Mme. Schumann,
Joachim and Brahms. In the latter part of 1870
he brought over his pupil Sophie Lowe to Eng
land, and remained till late in 1871. He once
more sang at the Philharmonic, and appeared
at the Crystal Palace and the Monday Populars,
where he introduced several fine unknown Lieder
of Schubert. He and Miss Lowe reappeared here
the next winter, and remained till the end of the
summer season of 1872.
In 1874 ke moved from Stuttgart to Berlin,
and took the direction of the Vocal Society
founded by Stern (Sternsches Gesangverein),
which under his genial and able direction rose to
the highest point of excellence. In the four
years that he conducted it there were no less
than 28 performances of great works, including
Beethoven's Mass in D, Mozart's Requiem,
Bach's Matthew Passion, Schumann's Faust music
(complete) and Paradise and the Peri, Brahms's
Requiem, etc. In 1878 he again changed his
residence, this time to Frankfort, to take the de
partment of singing in th e Con servatorium founded
by Dr. Hoch, and presided over by Raff. This
post, however, he soon gave up, and retired to
his house at Frankfort, teaching the many private
pupils who resorted to him there. Since the
death of Raff in 1882 he has returned to the
Conservatoriurn.
Stockhausen's singing in his best days must
have been wonderful. Even to those who, like
the writer, only heard him after he had passed
his zenith, it is a thing never to be forgotten.
Perhaps the maturity of the taste and expres
sion made up for a little falling off in the voice.
His delivery of opera and oratorio music — his
favourite pieces from Euryanthe, Jean de Paris,
Le Chaperon rouge, and Le Philtre ; or the
part of Elijah, or certain special airs of Bach —
was superb in taste, feeling, and execution ; but
it was the Lieder of Schubert and Schumann
that most peculiarly suited him, and these he
delivered in a truly remarkable way. The rich
beauty of the voice, the nobility of the style, the
perfect phrasing, the intimate sympathy, and,
STODART.
not least, the intelligible way in which the words
were given — in itself one of his greatest claims
to distinction — all combined to make his singino-
of songs a wonderful event. Those who have
heard him sing Schubert's ' Nachtstiick,' 'The
Wanderer,' 'Memnon,' or the Harper's songs;
or Schumann's 'Friihlingsnacht,' or ' Fluthen-
reicher Ebro,' or the 'Lb'wenbraut,' will corrobo
rate all that has just been said. But perhaps his
highest achievement was the part of Dr. Marianus
in the third part of Schumann's Faust, in which
his delivery of the scene of the ' Drei Himmels-
konigin' ('Hier ist die Aussicht frei'), with just
as much of acting as the concert-room will admit
—and no more — was one of the most touching
and remarkable things ever witnessed. [G-.]
STODART. A family of eminent pianoforte-
makers, whose business was founded in Wardour
Street, Soho, about the year 1776, by Robert
Stodart. It is said he had been in the Royal
Horse Guards, to be a private in which corps in
volved at that time the payment of £100, an
amount that must now be estimated by the then
higher value of money. Having little duty and
much leisure, Stodart became a pupil of John
Broadwood to learn pianoforte-making, and in
the books of Broadwood's firm appears, during
the year i775> ^° have taken his share in tuning
for customers. It was while he was under Broad-
wood that he had the privilege, enjoyed by them
as friends, of assisting Americus Backers in the
invention of the new movement for the grand
pianoforte since generally known as the 'English'
action. After Backers' death, Stodart, now upon
his own account, entered upon grand pianoforte
making with energy and ability, and soon made
a considerable reputation. The pianoforte was at
that time hardly emancipated from the harpsi
chord, and there were frequent endeavours to
combine both principles in one instrument. An
endeavour of this nature was patented by Stodart
in 1777, which is otherwise remarkable by the
first mention of the word ' grand ' in connection
with a pianoforte. In it he worked his crowquill
registers, and also a swell, by means of pedals.
We find the business in 1795 removed to
Golden Square, William Stodart in that year
taking out, from that address, a patent for an
' Upright Grand.' This was the horizontal grand
turned up vertically in the same way the up
right harpsichord had been. The giraffe-like
upright grand was then coming into fashion, and
the speciality of Stodart's patent was to intro
duce one in the form of a book-case. Of the
highest importance was the patent of James
Thorn and William Allen, who were in Stodart's
employ, a compensating framing of metal tubes
and plates at once secured by Stodart's firm.
This meritorious invention, which was really
Allen's, was brought out in 1820, and paved the
way to the general introduction of iron in piano
fortes as a resisting power. [See PIANOFORTE.]
When Malcolm Stodart, who had shown great
promise, died, the interest of the survivors ceased,
and the business, which had been declining, came,
in 1861, to an end. [A.J.H.]
STOKES.
STOKES, CHARLES. This excellent musician
was born in 1784* and received his first instruc
tions as a chorister in St. Paul's Cathedral. He
was afterwards a pupil of Mr. Webbe, senior,
the glee composer, who was his godfather — and
of other masters ; but he was most indebted for
his musical knowledge to Mr. Samuel Wesley,
with whom he was long and intimately ac
quainted. Mr. Stokes officiated for several years
as assistant-organist to Dr. Callcott, at St. Paul's,
Covent Garden, and for Mr. Bartleman at Croy-
don ; but he latterly preferred the quiet pursuit
of his own studies, in domestic retirement, to
the exertion and fatigue of public engagements.
Yet his musical acquirements were of the highest
order. Vincent Novello speaks of him as a most
able teacher, an excellent organist, a delightful
pianoforte-player, a refined and tasteful com
poser, and one of the most profound musical
theorists now living. His name was little known,
and his published music was almost confined
to the pieces printed in Novello' s ' Select Organ
Pieces' (from which this notice is derived). That
collection contains 10 pieces by Stokes, full of quiet
feeling, and real, though somewhat antiquated,
musicianship. Novello also published an A nthem
of his, ' I will lay me down in peace.' [G.]
STOLTZ, ROSINE, celebrated French singer,
whose chequered life has afforded materials for
more than one romance, born in Paris, Feb. 1 3,
1815. According to Fetis her real name was
Victorine Noeb, but she entered Ramier's class
in Choron's school in 1826 as Rose Niva. She
became a chorus-singer at one of the theatres
after the Revolution of 1830, and in 1832 made
a very modest ddbut at Brussels. In 1833 she
sang at Lille under the name of Rosine Stoltz.
Her knowledge of music was deficient, and she
never became a perfect singer, but nevertheless
made a considerable mark in lyric tragedy. The
first time she displayed her powers was when
acting with A. Nourrit as Rachel in ' La Juive '
at Brussels in 1836. She re-appeared in the part
at the OpeYa in Paris, Aug. 25, 1837. Though in
ferior to Mile. Falcon, who had created the role, the
public was interested by a talent so original and
full of fire, though so unequal, and Mme. Stoltz
became a favourite from the day she appeared in
parts written expressly for her. Indeed through
out Le"on Pillet's management (1841 to 47) she
reigned without a rival. She created the follow
ing mezzo-soprano parts : — Lazarillo in Marliani's
'Xacarilla' (1839); Le"onore in 'La Favorite'
(1840); Agathe in ' Der Freischiitz' (1841);
Catarina in 'La Reine de Chypre' (1841);
Odette in 'Charles VI' (1843) ; Zayda in Doni
zetti's 'DomSebastien'(i843); Beppo in HaleVy's
'Lazzarone/ Desdemona in 'Otello,' and ' Marie
Stuart' in Niedermeyer's opera (1844) ; Estrelle
in Balfe's ' Etoile de SeVille' (1845); David in
Mermet's opera of that name, and Marie in
Rossini's pasticcio 'Robert Bruce' (1846). The
last three were failures, and in 1849 sne ^e^
Paris, but appeared for some time longer in the
provinces and abroad. Then no more was heard
of her excepting the fact of her successive mar-
STOPS (HARPSICHORD). 717
riages to a Baron and two foreign princes. Schoen
published in her name six melodies for voice
and PF. in 1870.
Among the works based on the life of Rosine
Stoltz may be mentioned Scudo's ' Histoire d'une
cantatrice de 1'Opdra'; Lamer's 'Mme. Rosine
Stoltz' (Paris 1847, i6mo) ; Cantinjou's ' Les
Adieux de Mine. Stoltz' (Paris 1847, i8mo)
and Mile. Eugenie PeVignon's 'Rosine Stoltz'
(Paris 1847, Svo).
She must not be confounded with Teresina
Stolz, an Italian soprano who distinguished her
self in Verdi's operas, especially as Aida. [G.C.]
STONARD, WILLIAM, Mus. Doc., Oxon. 1608,
was organist of Christ Church Cathedral, Oxford.
Some of his compositions are preserved in the
Music School, Oxford, and an Evening Service in
C in the Tudway Collection (Harl. MS. 7337).
The words of some of his anthems are in Clifford's
Collection. He died in 1630. [W.H.H.]
STOOPS TO CONQUER, SHE. An English
opera, in three acts ; adapted by E. Fitzball from
Goldsmith's comedy ; music by G. A. Macfarren.
Produced at Drury Lane Theatre (Pyne & Har
rison), Feb. n, 1864. [G.]
STOPPED PIPE. An organ pipe, the upper
end of which is closed by a wooden plug, or cap
of metal. The pitch of a stopped pipe is one
octave lower (roughly speaking) than that of an
open pipe of the same length ; it is usual there
fore, in a specification, to state the pitch of a
stopped pipe instead of its length; thus, 'Open
Diapason 16 ft.,' 'Bourdon 1 6 ft. -tone.' etc. By
the former it is understood that the longest pipe
is 1 6 ft. long; by the latter that the longest
pipe (though only 8 ft. in length) gives the
same note as an open pipe of 16 ft. For the
acoustic law which governs the pitch of closed
pipes, see PIPES, VIBRATION OF Am IN, vol. ii.
p. 754- [J.S.]
STOPPING. The technical term for the opera
tion of pressing the fingers on the strings of a
violin, viola, etc., necessary to produce the notes.
DOUBLE-STOPPING is the producing of two notes
at once. [G.]
STOPS (HARPSICHORD). Like the organ,
the harpsichord had stops, by which, with double
keyboard, contrasts as well as changes could be
made. The principle, borrowed from the organ,
was the simple movement of each rack of jacks
forming a register, so that the quills of the jacks
might or might not touch the strings. The
earliest notice of stops to a keyed stringed in-
trument appears in the Privy Purse Expenses of
Henry VIII., April 1530, published by Sir N.
Harris Nicholas in 1827 (Rimbault, History of
the Pianoforte, 1860, p. 33). The item mentions
'ii payer of Virginalls in one coffer with iiii
stoppes.' The term 'Virginals ' in England under
the Tudors and up to the Commonwealth, had,
like ' Clavier' in German, the general significa
tion of any keyed stringed instrument. [See
VIRGINAL.] We therefore interpret this quota
tion as a double harpsichord, in one case, with
718 STOPS (HARPSICHORD).
four stops. If this be so, we must perforce limit
Hans Ruckers's invention to the ' ottava,' the
octave string [see RUCKERS], withdrawing from
him the double keyboard and stops. In all un
altered Ruckers harpsichords, we find the regis
ters made as in the old Positive organs,1 by the
prolongation of the racks as rails or slides, so
as to pass through and project beyond the right-
hand or treble side of the case. Each rail-end
has a short loop of cord to pull it by. Miss
Twining's Andries Ruckers of 1640, and Mr.
Leyland's Hans Ruckers the younger of 1642,
have only this simple arrangement. But sub
sequently, to be nearer the hands, the registers
were shifted by iron crank levers, and manipu
lated by brass knobs divided into two groups on
either side of the nameboard, and immediately
above the keys. The older instruments were
often altered and modernised by the addition of
this contrivance. The two unison stops were
placed to the player's right hand, and as the re
versed position of the quills when acting upon
the strings required, could be brought into play
by squeezing the two brass knobs together, or
made silent by pushing them apart. The ottava
was placed to the player's left hand, with the
Lute and Harp stops, which were of later intro
duction, and require separate description.
The Lute, a timbre or colour stop, doubtless
arose from observation of the power which lute-
players, like viol- and guitar-players, had of
changing the quality of the tone by touching the
strings closer to the bridge. Perhaps the earliest
reference to an attempt to imitate these instru
ments on the harpsichord has been found by
Count L. F. Valdrighi, of Modena, in a letter in
the Este records dated March 3, 1595, by Giacomo
Alsise, horn-maker of Padua, who says : 'I have
let Messer Alessandro see and hear . . . one of my
quill instruments (da penna), of new invention,
that with two unisons (due mani di corde) forms
three changes of sound.' The passage is obscure,
but if, as is probable, two jacks touched one
string in Alsise's instrument, one must touch
nearer the bridge than the other, and produce a
different quality of sound. This might seem far
fetched were not Mr. Leyland's Antwerp harpsi
chord of 1642 actually so made. Here are four
certainly original changes, with three strings, two
unisons and an octave, and the different quality
is sought for upon the octave string! A few
years later, and in England, Thomas Mace (' Mu-
sick's Monument,' 1676) speaks of the 'The-
orboe' stop, which may have been only another
name for the Lute stop. Certainly in England
in the next century the use of the Lute stop,
with its fascinating oboe quality, was universal,2
and it was frequently added to old harpsichords.
The second fancy stop, the 'Harp,' was con
trived to push small pieces of firm leather against
1 Bee the organ depicted in ' Music,' attributed to Melozzo Da Forli
(1438—1494), in the National Gallery, London.
2 Queen Charlotte's Shudi harpsichord at Windsor Castle has an
original Lute stop, and the date is 1740. This instrument, long at
Kew Palace, was probably made for Frederick, Prince of Wales,
George the Third's lather.
STOPS (ORGAN).
the second unison.3 We have unquestionable
authority for this in a double harpsichord of
Shudi's, of 1771, that has never been disturbed.
From the material being leather, this is often
called the 'buff' stop, and a single harpsichord,
now at Torquay, inscribed 'Longman & Broderip,'
but bearing inside the real maker's name, ' Culli-
ford,' and date 1775, which has all the stops
named, has this one marked ' Silent.' The earliest
mention of the Harp stop (as ' Welch harp ') is in
a patent taken out by Roger Plenius in 1745.
The combination of the Lute stop by the first
unison on the upper keyboard, and the second
unison, which could be muted by the Harp stop
on the lower, was effected by a pedal for the left
foot. But to allow this pedal to be used, a stop
placed inside the case, at the bass end of the key
boards, away from the other stops, had to be
pushed back. Culliford's harpsichord gives the
name for this pedal stop, the 'Machine,' derived
from the ironwork of the pedal movement placed
outside the case, and usually concealed by a box
covering. The alternation of Lute and Harp
with the normal registers of the upper and lower
keyboards, is the most pleasing colour effect of
the harpsichord. In Kirkman's harpsichord we
find the Lute muted, without knowing for cer
tain if this was the original plan. This muting
has 'the high authority of Mr. Carl Engel, who
transferred Messrs. Kirkman's description of
the stops from the Catalogue of the Special
Exhibition at South Kensington, 1872, to his
admirable General Catalogue of Musical instru
ments in the Museum, 1874, P- 352-
The right-foot pedal is for the Swell. [See
SWELL (HARPSICHORD).] Mace attributes the
invention of the harpsichord pedal to John Hay-
ward, a ' harpsichon ' maker. Kirkman and Shudi
did not place their fancy stops alike. Kirkman's
arrangement (and Culliford's), proceeding from
the bass, was Harp, Lute, Octave ; Shudi's was
Lute, Octave, Harp. In all, the Lute, Octave,
and first Unison move to the right; the Harp
and second Unison to the left. Shudi marked
this on Frederick the Great's harpsichords, still
preserved at Potsdam, with arrows and the Eng
lish words 'ring' and 'dumb'; the Machine stop,
'open,' 'shut.' The Germans do not appear at
that time to have cared for the varieties in the
harpsichord given by stops. C. P. E. Bach makes
no remarks in his 'Versuch' about them. He
merely says (1753, p. 131) that on a Fliigel with
more than one keyboard the player has the forte
and piano ; that is to say, the lower and upper
keyboards make those changes.* [A.J.H.]
STOPS (ORGAN). This word is used in two
senses — for the handles or draw-stops which are
placed near the organ-player, and by which he can
shut off or draw on the various registers; and for
the registers themselves. Thus we speak of a
' stop ' being half-out, meaning the actual handle
3 Shudi put a spring on the 2nd unison slide, so that it could not
be pushed off without moving a rail outside the case, next the
1 Machine.'
4 In the posthumous 2nd edition, 1797, he recommends Hohlfeld's
pedal, which appears to have been a sostenente, for a dynamic
change.
STOPS (OEGAN).
communicating with the sliders, and at the same
time we speak of ' an organ having 20 stops,'
meaning 20 registers. The latter use of the word
has caused the appearance of a new expression,
namely, 'sounding stops' or stops acting on pipes,
as opposed to couplers and other accessory move
ments governed also by a stop-handle. When
the pipes governed by a stop do not go through
the whole compass, it is said to be a ' short stop,'
'incomplete stop, 'or 'half-stop.' When a complete
row of pipes is acted upon by means of two stops,
treble and bass, it is called a ' divided stop.' [See
ORGAN § 3, vol. ii. p. 605.] [J.S.]
STORACE, ANN (otherwise ANNA) SELINA,
daughter of Stefano Storace, an eminent Italian
contrabassist who had settled in England, was
born in London in 1766. She was first instructed
in music by her father, and when only 8 years
old appeared as a singer afc the Haymarket
Theatre, in a concert given by Evans, the harper,
April 15, 1774. She was afterwards a pupil of
Rauzzini, and in 1777 sang in the oratorios at
Covent Garden and at Hereford Festival. On
April 27, 1778, she had a benefit concert at the
Tottenham Street Rooms (now the Prince of
Wales's Theatre), 'to enable her to pursue her
studies, as she intends to go to Italy in the course
of the ensuing summer.' She accordingly re
paired to Venice, where she became a pupil of
the Conservatorio del 1'Ospedaletto, under Sac-
chini. In 1780 she appeared at La Pergola,
Florence, with great success. In 1781 she sang
at Parma, and in 1782 at La Scala, Milan. In
1 7 84 she was engaged at the Imperial Theatre,
Vienna, at a salary equal to £500 sterling for the
season, a then unprecedented sum. During her
stay in the Austrian capital two important events
in her career happened, (i) her appearance on
May r, 1 786, as the original performer of Susanna
in Mozart's delightful opera, 'Le Nozze di Figaro,'
and (2) her ill-starred marriage with Fisher the
violinist. [See FISHER, JOHN ABRAHAM.] She
returned to England in March 1 787, and appeared
at the King's Theatre, March 24, as Gelinda, in
Paisiello's opera, ' Gli Schiavi per amore,' and
afterwards in other comic operas, but she soon
abandoned the Italian for the English stage, on
which she made her first appearance at Drury
Lane, Nov. 24, 1789, in her brother's opera,
'The Haunted Tower,' and for several years
afterwards sustained, with the greatest success,
a variety of characters in comic opera. In I791
she sang at the Handel Festival in Westminster
Abbey, and in 1792 at Hereford Festival. In
I So i she was engaged at Covent Garden, where
she continued to perform until May 30, 1808,
when she took her leave of the public in the
opera of ' The Cabinet.' She resided in retire
ment at Herne Hill Cottage, Dulwich, until her
death, Aug. 24, 1817, and was buried at St.
Mary's, Lambeth. She accumulated a consider
able fortune, and by her will, dated Aug. 10,
1797 (20 years before her death), bequeathed up
wards of £11,000 in pecuniary legacies alone,
including two munificent gifts of £1000 each to
the Old Musical Fund (Royal Society of Musi-
STORACE.
719
cians), and New Musical Fund. This will was/
proved Oct. 11, 1817, the personalty being sworn
under £50,000. It was said in 1820 that after
payment of all the legacies, there remained but
little short of £40,000 for her cousin, Miss Trus-
ler, the residuary legatee. Her studious con
cealment, after her return to England, of h,er
marriage, is evidenced by her having made her
will in her maiden name and avoided any de
scription in it of her quality or condition, and
also by the fact that her executor, in proving the
will, describes her as a spinster. [W.H.H.]
STORACE, STEPHEN, brother of the preceding,
was born in London in 1763. His early taste for
music was cultivated by his father, so that when
ten years old he was able to perform the most
difficult violin music of Tartini and Giardini — the
Paganinis of the day — with correctness and
steadiness. When 12 years old he was placed
in the Conservatorio of St. Onofrio at Naples,
where he studied the harpsichord, violin, and
composition. On his sister's arrival in Italy, a
few years later, he joined her and visited with
her the principal cities of that country, and event
ually went to Vienna, where he produced his
two operas, 'Gli Sposi malcontenti ' (June i,
1785) and ' GH Equivoci/ the subject taken from
Shakspere's 'Comedy of Errors,' Dec. 27, 1786.
He gained great advantage whilst there from his
association with Mozart. In March 1787 he re
turned to England and was engaged to superin
tend the production of the opera in which his
sister appeared at the King's Theatre, but soon
became disgusted with the prevalent petty jea
lousies and intrigues, and retired for a time to
Bath, where he devoted his attention to drawing,
for which he had considerable talent. He re
turned to his musical pursuits in the ensuing
year, and on Oct. 25, 1788, produced at Drury
Lane the musical farce of 'The Doctor and the
Apothecary ' (the music of which he had pre
viously used for a ' Singspiele ' entitled ' Der
Doctor und der Apotheker,' performed at Vienna,
July n, 1786), with great success. Besides his
own music a few pieces by Dittersdorff were in
cluded in it. On Nov. 24, 1789, he brought out
his opera 'The Haunted Tower,' the success of
which was unbounded ; it was performed 50
nights in the first season and kept its place upon
the stage for nearly half a century. On April
16, 1790, he produced his charming little opera,
'No Song no Supper,' in which he introduced
some of the music of 'Gli Equivoci.' Jan. i,
1791, witnessed the production of the opera 'The
Siege of Belgrade,' in which he introduced much
of the music of Martini's ' La Cosa rara.' This
also long continued an established favourite. On
May 3 in the same year he produced the ' Cave
of Trophonius,' an adaptation of Salieri's 'La
Grotta di Trofonio,' with some additional music
by himself, but with no success. He fared better
when, on Nov. 20, 1792, he brought out 'The
Pirates,' in which he incorporated several pieces
from ' Gli Equivoci.' The finale to the first act
is regarded as his masterpiece. In the same year
he produced his opera, ' Dido, Queen of Carthage,'
720
STORAGE.
which met with but small success, notwithstanding
that the heroine was undertaken by Mara. ' The
Prize,' musical entertainment, first performed on
his sister's benefit night, March II, 1793 ; 'My
Grandmother,' musical farce, produced Dec. 16,
1793; 'Lodoiska,' musical romance, the music
partly adapted from Cherubini and Kreutzer, and
partly composed by himself, performed June 9,
1794 ; 'The Glorious First of June,' occasional
piece, produced July 2, 1794; and the 'Cherokee,'
comic opera, first played Dec. 20, I794> were
all well received, as was also 'The Three and
the Deuce,' musical drama, performed Sept. 2,
1 795. On March 12,1 796, Colman's ' Iron Chest,'
with Storace's music, was performed for the first
time, and although the play, owing to accidental
circumstances, failed to produce an immediately
favourable impression, the music was rapturously
received. But few however, if any, of the gratified
and applauding auditors knew or thought that
anxiety for the success of that music had impelled
its composer to a course which had laid him
upon his deathbed. He was then recovering
from a severe attack of gout and fever; yet urged
by a sense of duty, he determined, despite the
entreaties of his family, to attend the first re
hearsal. The consequence was fatal : he took
cold, the gout attacked his stomach, and on
March 19 he expired, at the early age of 33 years.
At the time of his death he had an opera,
'Mahmoud, or The Prince of Persia,' in prepara
tion for Braham's debdt in London. This, work
was left incomplete, but, by the assistance of
Kelly, and the selection of some music by the
composer's sister, A. S. Storace, it was fitted for
performance and produced for the benefit of his
widow and child, April 30, 1796, was well re
ceived, and performed many times. Storace's
melodies are thoroughly English in character,
whilst in his instrumentation the influence of
Mozart and the Italian composers is evident.
He was almost the first English composer who
introduced into his works the modern finale, in
which the business of the scene is carried on by
concerted music.1 Some fine examples occur in
his works. There is reason for believing that his
early death delayed for many years the advance
in that direction which might otherwise have
been made. [W.H.H.]
STORM, REPRESENTATION OP, IN MUSIC. The
endeavour to portray the strife of the elements
has always had a fascination for composers.
Most of the best-known efforts in this direction
are catalogued in the article PROGRAMME Music,
and it only remains here to glance at the
technical means by which the effect has been
produced. These vary but little. In many
musical tempests, especially the older ones, an
agitated movement with plenty of tremolos and
semiquaver passages is deemed sufficient to con
vey the idea, but many composers have sought
accurately to imitate the sounds and even the
aspect of nature during a storm, with varying
success. Haydn has an exceedingly impressive
i Dibdin had foreshadowed it in his ' Quaker.'
STORM.
movement in his 'Seasons.' The four bars of
hesitating quavers before the storm bursts con
vey vividly the idea of the first few heavy drops
of rain, an effect which Beethoven produces by
rather different means in the opening of his in
imitable movement in the Pastoral Symphony.
With regard to this latter piece it should be
noticed that its general idea is anticipated in
the 'Prometheus' ballet-music introduction,
some passages and modulations pursuing an
identical course, the descending bass with double
bowed violin figure above, and the latter bars
especially. As to the famous passage which
imitates lightning and thunder
;
*£&
^
we believe it has never yet been pointed out that
the lightning comes after the thunder throughout ;
a rather startling violation of nature's laws, when
one comes to think of it !
One grave absurdity should here be alluded
to ; namely, the imitating, by the appearance of
a written passage on paper, the form of sound
less objects ! It is quite admissible to represent
the howling of the wind by rising and falling
chromatic scales, but to imitate a flash of light
ning by a zigzag passage on the piccolo, as is
done by Haydn (Seasons) and Wagner (Die
Walkiire) ; or, still worse, to depict the form of
waves by broken chords and arpeggios, as is
done by almost every composer, is an immemorial
custom as ridiculous as was Mattheson's attempt
to represent the rainbow round about the throne
by quavers arranged in circular arcs, or the
practice of the composers before Palestrina, who
wrote the notes expressing blood in red and those
expressing grass in green.
To the kettledrums has always been confided
the task of imitating thunder. Rossini, in the
' William Tell ' Overture, rather misses his effect
by one long-continued roll ; Beethoven's thunder
in the Pastoral Symphony is realistic, and at
the same time idealised, while Berlioz, in the
' Episode de la vie d'un artiste ' is startlingly true
to nature. Wagner presents us with several
striking examples of storms. A storm at sea is
vividly depicted by the Overture and other
portions of the music to the ' Fliegender Hol
lander,' although the absurdity above alluded to,
of a wave-passage, is here very prominent.
The most original treatment, perhaps, of a
storm is in the prelude to 'Die Walkiire.'
Throughout this drama the weather is very bad,
and there are various kinds of storms, but the
first is a magnificent one. The tremolo D held
by the violins and violas for nearly 7° Dars
against the rushing wind of the basses,
STORM.
STRADELLA.
721
Presto.
etc.
is surprisingly effective, and were it not for the
comical lightning effect
the artistic value of the movement would be
much greater. In Act 2 a theatrical 'thunder
machine' is used to enhance the effect, but this
cannot be said to belong to the score, though i fc
stands there. [F-C-]
STORNELLO. ' A short poem, in lines of
eleven syllables each : it is peculiar to, and liked
by, the people in Tuscany, who extemporise it
with elegant simplicity.' This is the definition
of Sfcornello we find in Mons. Tommaseo's Dic
tionary, and, in this matter at least, we are not
aware of any greater authority. The ' Vocabo-
lario degli Accademici della Crusca,' the strong
hold of the purity of the Italian language, does
not contain the word : this fact, added to the
other, not less significant, that neither Crescim-
beni, nor Quadrio, nor Tiraboschi, mention the
word in their elaborate works, inclines us to be
lieve that the word Stornello has not the definite
meaning that, for instance, Sonnetto has ; but is
merely a name given in some parts of Italy to
very short poems, more with regard to their
purport than their form. Tommaseo again,
somewhere else, speaking of Tonio and Beatrice,
two peasants who sang and recited popular songs
and popular poems to him, says : ' Tonio makes
a difference between Hispetti and Ramanzetti :
the latter are composed of only three lines, the
former of eight or ten. And those that Tonio
called Ramanzetti Beatrice called Strambotti, as
Matteo Spinello and King Manfredi did ; and in
the territory of Pistoja and in Florence they are
distinguished by the name of Stornelli.' Although
in the true popular songs of Italy there is a great
freedom in the number of lines and rules of
rhyming, the two Stornelli we subjoin may be
taken as fair examples of this kind of poem.1
(1) Tutta la notte in sogno mi venito :
Ditemi; bella mia, perche lo fate ?
Echi viene da voi quando dormite ?
(2) Fiori di pepe.
So giro intorno a voi come fa 1'ape
Che gira intorno al fiore della siepe.
The first line may contain either five or eleven
syllables ; the other two are of eleven syllables
each. The first line rhymes with the third, i. P.
the two have the last syllable, and the vowel of
1 From Tigri's ' Canto Populare Toscani' (Florence, 1869).
VOL. III. PT. 6.
the last syllable but one, alike : the intermediate
line, while corresponding in its last .syllable with
the last syllable of the other two lines, changes
the vowel of the accented one.
The etymology of ' Stornello' is very uncertain :
Tommaseo, however, has some ground for asserting
that it is a corruption of 'Kitornello,' or 're
frain.' [G.M.]
STRADA DEL PO, ANNA. An Italian so
prano, brought from Italy by Handel in 1729,
with Bernacchi, Merighi, Fabri, and others, for
the opera in the Haymarket. She appeared
there in 'Lotario,'Dec. 2, 1729; in 'Partenope,'
Feb. 24, 1730; 'Poro,' Feb. 2, 1731; ' Ezio,'
Jan. 15, 1732; 'Sosarme' (originally 'Alfonso
Primo'), Feb. 19, 1732 — including the lullaby,
' Rend' il sereno,' for Strada, afterwards so
well known in an English dress as ' Lord, re
member David'; in ' Acis and Galatea,' June
10, 1732 ; and in 'Orlando,' Jan. 23, 1733. She
was the only one of Handel's company who did
not desert him for the rival new opera in Lin
coln's Inn in the end of 1 733, and she remained
faithful to him till her departure from this
country in June 1738, when a quarrel with
Heidegger, the manager, put an end to her con
nexion with England. In the interval between
1733 and the last-named date she took part in
Handel's 'Ariodante,' ' Alcina,' 'Atalanta,' 'Ar-
minio,' 'Giustino,' 'Berenice'; also in 'Athaliah'
and ' Alexander's Feast.'
Even on her arrival, though, according to
Handel,2 fa coarse singer with a fine voice,' Strada
must have had some brilliant execution, for the
first air which she sang on those boards contains
no less than thirty opportunities to display her
shake. Coming after Cuzzoni and Faustina, and
having so little to recommend her to the eye
that she was nicknamed 'the pig,' it took her
some time to get into favour. But Handel took
pains with her, wrote for her, and advised her,
and at length rendered her equal to the first
singers of the Continent. [G.]
STRADELLA, ALESSANDEO, an Italian com
poser of the 1 7th century. The earliest and
only detailed account of him is that given by
Bonnet-Bourdelot,3 of which we here subjoin the
literal English translation.
A man named Stradel, an eminent musician, while
in Venice, engaged by the Government of the Republic
to write the music of the operas, charmed everybody no
less by the beauty of his voice than by the merit of his
compositions. A Venetian nobleman, named Pig. . . .,
whose mistress was well educated in the art of singing,
desired to have her perfected by the fashionable musi
cian, and that he should teach her at her own house ; a
thing much against the habits of the Venetians, who
are known to be extremely jealous. After a few months'
lessons such a reciprocal affection had grown up be
tween teacher and pupil, that they resolved on the first
opportunity to escape together to Home. The oppor
tunity soon presented itself. The elopement drove the
Venetian almost to despair, and he determined to re
venge himself by having them both murdered. He at once
sent for two of the most notorious assassins then in
Venice, agreed to pay them a hundred pistoles, to enable
them to follow and murder Stradel and his mistress ;
and in addition to defray expenses and advance half
2 Burney's History, iv. 342. The above Information is compiled
from the same volume. 339—427.
3 Histoire de la musique et de ses effets. Paris, 1715.
3 A
722
STRADELLA.
the sum. At the same time he gave them full instruc
tions for the safe accomplishment of the murder. They
made for Naples, where they learned that Stradel was
in Home with his mistress, who passed for his wife.
They informed the Venetian nobleman of this, . . . and
begged him to send them letters of introduction to the
Venetian ambassador at Home, that they might be sure
of finding an asylum. On their arrival in Rome they
discovered that on the next day, at five in the afternoon,
Stradel was to have a spiritual opera, or oratorio, per
formed at St. John Lateran, where the murderers did
not fail to go in the hope of carrying out their design as
Stradel went home with his mistress. But the enthu
siasm of the public for the music, and its effect on the
murderers themselves, was such as to change by magic
their anger into piety, and they agreed that it would be
a pity to kill a man whose musical genius formed the
admiration of all Italy; in fact, moved by one and the
same feeling, they resolved upon saving his life instead
of taking it. Accordingly, on his leaving the church, they
complimented him on the oratorio, told him their in
tention of assassinating him and his mistress, to revenge
the Venetian nobleman . . . ; but that the charm of his
music had changed their minds ; and advised him to
leave on the morrow for a place of safety. Meanwhile,
lest they should be suspected of neglecting their duty,
they would inform the nobleman that he had left Eome
on the eve of their arrival there. Stradel did not wait
for further advice, but with his mistress made straight
for Turin, where the present ' Madame Royale ' was then
Regent. The murderers returned to Venice, and in
formed the nobleman, as they had already written, that
Stradel had left Rome for Turin, where it was certainly
much more difficult to commit an important murder
than in any other Italian town, owing to the garrison,
and to the tact that no places of asylum were respected,
save only houses of ambassadors. But Stradel was no
safer for that : for the Venetian nobleman began to con
sider how best to carry out his revenge in Turin7 and
with that view interested his mistress's father in it,
who betook himself to Venice with two assassins, with
the express purpose of slaying his own daughter and
Stradel in Turin, after having obtained letters of intro
duction from the Abbd d'Estrade, French ambassador
at Venice, to the Marquis de Villars, French ambas
sador at Turin. M. d'Estrade requested protection for
three merchants staying in Turin. These merchants
were the assassins, who regularly paid their homage to
the ambassador, while waiting for an opportunity to
accomplish their design. But the Regent having been
apprised of the true cause of Stradel's flight, and being
fully aware of the character of the Venetians, placed
Stradel's mistress in a convent, and engaged him for
her own band. One evening, as he was walking on the
ramparts of Turin, he was suddenly attacked by the
three murderers, who each stabbed him in the chest,
and then took refuge in the house of the French am
bassador. The deed being witnessed by many people,
who were promenading on the ramparts, instantly
caused an immense excitement. The gates of the town
were closed, and the Regent gave orders that the
utmost diligence should be employed to find out the
assassins. On learning that they were in the house of
the French ambassador she demanded that they should
be delivered up, but the ambassador refused to do so
without an order from his king The occurrence
made much noise throughout all Italy. On the request
of M. de Villars the assassins gave him the reasons for
their proceeding; he wrote to d'Estrade, who answered
that he had been deceived by Pig , who was one
of the most powerful noblemen in Venice. As how
ever Stradel did not die from his wounds, M. de
Villars allowed the assassins to escape, the chief being,
as we have said, the father of the nobleman's mis
tress, whom he would have killed had he found the
opportunity.
But as the Venetians never forgive treachery in love
affairs, Stradel could not escape his enemy, who left spies
in Turin charged to follow his movements ; and a year
after his recovery, while in Genoa with his mistress,
Ortensia, whom the Regent had given him in marriage
during his convalescence, they were murdered in their
bedroom. The murderers escaped on a boat that was
waiting for them in the harbour, and nothing more was
said about them. In this manner died the most excellent
musician of all Italy, about the year 1670.
Contrary to M. Fetis's opinion, we believe, for
the reasons now to be submitted, that this nar
rative has been too readily accepted by all
writers on Stradella, with the exception of M.
STKA.DELLA.
Richard l and M. Catelani,2 whose researches,
however, have not led to any positive result.
Being thus thrown back again upon the state
ment of Bonnet-Bourdelot, we shall point out
the main objections to its veracity, as well as the
mistakes that occur in it either from carelessness
or want of exact information.
The materials for the ' Histoire de la musique
et de ses effets ' were collected by Pierre Bour
delot, who at his death in 1685 entrusted the
compilation of the work to his nephew Pierre
Bonnet ; who in his turn dying in 1 7oS, before
the history was completed, it fell to the lot of
his brother Jacques Bonnet — an erudite person
but of unsound mind and much given to the
cabala — to wind tip and publish the book. None
of the three appear to have been musicians, and
this fact, added to the mental condition of the
final editor, is much against the accuracy of the
statement. Moreover the story is told k propos
to Poliziano's death, merely to strengthen the
opinion advanced by Bourdelot that ' no young
teacher of singing ought to be given to a young
lady.'3 If we were to take his narrative of
Poliziano's death as a test of the accuracy and
truth of Stradella's history, we should be very
cautious in accepting it. The particulars of
Poliziano's death are well known to us,* as they
might have been even to Bourdelot himself, had
he not preferred to adopt Varila's legend.5 If
he has so grossly mis-stated a matter regarding
which he had documents at hand, how can we
believe a statement which, with the exception
of the occurrence in Turin — apparently taken
from the correspondence of the ambassadors —
was made simply on the faith of court gossip 1
The mistakes in the narrative are three: (i)
Stradella could not have been engaged by the
Government of Venice to write operas, because
neither in the official lists, nor in Allacci, is there
any mention of such ; in addition to which the
operatic performances in Venice have always
been left to private enterprise; (2) the name of
the nobleman in question was not Pignaver, as
implied by the abbreviation Pig., but Contarini ;
(3) the date of Stradella's death is to be assigned
to a much later period than 1670, as will be seen
farther on. The account of the effect of the
music on the assassins savours too much of the
marvellous ; and even the murder at Genoa must
be very doubtful, seeing that the most accurate
historians do not mention it.6
The place of Stradella's birth is unknown.
Wanley 7 thinks he was a Venetian, while Bur-
1 Le Mgnestrel ; 1865, 51, 52 ; 1?66, 1 to 6, and 12 to 18.
2 Delle opere di A. Stradella esistenti nell Archivio Musicale della
B. Biblioteca Palatina di Modena. Modena, 1866.
3 Hist, de la mus. etc.. vol. i. chap, iii, ' Opinions of the philoso
phers, poets, and musicians of ancient titnes, on the use of vocal and
instrumental music, and of its effects on passions.'
4 Olassici Italian!, vol. xsxv, Vita di Angelo Poliziano. Slilano 1?08.
5 Relation of Poliziano's death by Roberto Ubaldini, a Dominican
monk, who after having assisted him during his last illness, dressed
him, by consent and order of Fra Domenico Savonarola, in the garb
of the religious order of the Predicalori. 1494.
6 ' Annali di Geneva,1 di FiUppo Casont ; ' Storia d'ltalia,' di Carlo
Botta; Bossi, ' Istoria d'ltalia ' ; Muratori, 'Annali d'ltalia'j Sis-
mondi, 'R^publiques Italiennes du moyea age.'
7 A Catalogue of the Harleian manuscripts in the British Museum,
vol. i. p. 642, cod. 1272.
STRADELLA.
ney l states he was a Neapolitan, apparently for
no other reason than that he sends Stradella and
Ortensia, en route for Rome, to Naples, which,
he adds, was ' the place of Stradella's nativity."
Felis,2 evidently on Burney's statement, but with
out quoting his authority, describes him as born at
Naples about 1645, and the assertion is now an
accepted statement.3 The dates both of his birth
and death are in fact unknown. But though we
reject the story of his murder at Genoa, it is not
impossible that he ended his life there, since the
composition, which we may presume to have been
his last, is dated from thence.
The date of his death was probably about 1681,
since there exists in the Biblioteca Palatina of
Modena, a cantata, ' II Barcheggio,' * written for
the wedding of Carlo Spinola and Paola Brignole,
at Genoa, July 6, 1681. The poem contains nu
merous allusions to it, and the names of both
bride and bridegroom ; no mistake is possible as
to the real date of the composition, and thus
the dates 1670 and 1678, given by Bourdelot and
Burney for his death, are evidently wrong.5
The statements that besides being a composer
Stradella was a singer,6 ' an exquisite performer
on the harp,'7 'a great performer on the violin,'8
'excelled in an extraordinary hand, so as to have
been accounted the best organist in Italy/9 ' was
a Latin and perhaps also an Italian poet,'10 are
all more or less gratuitous, and except composing,
it cannot be proved that he possessed any of these
qualifications. His name is never met with in
any of the best treatises of Italian literature,
either as a Latin or an Italian poet,11 and with
respect to his skill on the organ, we have been
unable to find anything to justify AVanley's
1 A General History of Music, iv. 100, 101.
2 Biographie universelle des musicians.
3 See 'Dictionnaire ge'ne'ral de Biographie et d'Histoire" (Paris
1857) ; ' Dictionnaire de la Conversation et de la lecture ' (Paris 1858) ;
Mendel, 'Mus. Conversations-Lexikon ' (1877); Biemann, Musik-
Lexikon (1882).
4 On the first page of the score is written : ' II Barcheggio, del Sig.
Alessandro Stradella 1681. L'ultima delle sue sinlonie.' After the
overture, and before the duet with which the scene opens, at the top
of the page is written 'Inuentione per un Barcheggio 1681. 16
Giugno. L'ultima composizione del Sig. Alessandro Stradella ' This
is a cantata for soprano, tenor and bass, in two parts. Each part is
preceded by an overture. The score is for two violins, cornet or
trumpet, and bass : a. trombone di rinforzo at times with the bass.
5 Burney's mistake is easily explainable, because, when he wrote,
4 II Barcheggio ' had not yet been discovered, and he was in possession
of a libretto ' La forza dell' amor paterno,' Genoa 1678, dedicated to
Signora Teresa Kaggi Saoli, by Alessandro Stradella, the dedication
apparently written by Stradella himself. The facts that the oratorio
'S. Giovanni Battista'— supposed to be that which saved its author's
life in Rome— bears the date ' Rome 1676,' and the fact that Bour-
delot's account implies a period of two years between Stradella's
singing in Rome and his murder in Genoa, induced Burney to believe
that Stradella might have met his death in Genoa while attending
the rehearsals of his new opera. However, that libretto was seen by
Burney only, and has since disappeared.
6 Bourdelot and all biographers.
7 Hawkins's History, vol. iv. bk. 2. chap. 10.
8 Burney, ' A General History of Music,' iv. 100.
9 A Catalogue of the Harleian MSS.
10 Catelani. ' Delle opere di A. Stradella esistent, etc.'
11 ' Delia Storia e della Ragione di ogni Poesia,' di F. S. Quadrio.
Bologna-Milano, 1739-1742. Tiraboschi, ' Storia della letteratura ita-
lianas.' Ginguene, ' Histoire litte'raire d'ltalie.' Giovan Mario Cres-
cimbeni, 'Dall' Istoria della volgar Poesia.' In this last work, Stra
della is spoken of only where the author, dealing with the Cantatas.
thus expresses himself: 'they are pretty things and the best and
most pleasant diversion that one can enjoy in any honourable and
noble conversation ; especially when set to music by eminent maestri,
as, amongst the old ones, are those by the famous Alessandro Stra
della. one of which was sung not long since in the Academy of the
Cardinal Otttboui by Andrea Adami detto il Bolsena.' Vol. i. lib. iv.
chap. xii. p. 330. This passage is quoted from Ed". 3, 1731.
STRADELLA.
723
assertion, beyond a short Sonata in D for two vio
lins and basso continue per 1'Organo.12 As to the
statements in the 'Penny Cyclopaedia/ that ' Stra
della was not handsome, but remarkable for the
symmetry of his form, his wit and polished
manners,' and in Wanley's catalogue, that 'he
was a comely person and of an amorous nature/
I can do no more than submit them to the reader,
as striking instances of the way in which mythical
statements gather round a central figure.
Nothing can be positively asserted as to his
having been married to Ortensia by the Royal
Madame after the occurrence in Turin, because
the archives of S. Giovanni di Torino, the parish
of the Court, have been destroyed by fire. The
Madame Royale alluded to by Bourdelot must
be Jeanne Marie de Nemours (who became
Regent at the death of her husband, Charles
Emanuel II., June 12, 1675), and not Christine
de France (who died Dec. 27, 1663), as M. Fili-
bert 13 and other writers have stated.
Where or with whom Stradella studied is en
tirely unknown. In the archives of the Royal
Conservatorio di Musica in Naples, where all the
documents formerly belonging to the superseded
Conservatori are most carefully kept, his name
does not occur : nor is it mentioned in Lichten-
thal's catalogue.14 None of his numerous operas are
known to have been performed in his life-time,15
with the possible exception of 'II Trespolo.'16
Stradella as a composer is known to modern
audiences by the Aria di Chiesa, ' Pietk ! Signer ! '
attributed to him. Space will not allow us to
enumerate the few pros and many cons respect
ing its authenticity. It is enough to say that
no musician, even though but slightly acquainted
with the works that are indisputably by Stra
della, will attribute it to him. The composer of
that beautiful composition is generally believed
to be Fe'tis, Niedermeyer, or Rossini. The
words are taken from the second stanza of
Arsenio's aria in Alessandro Scarlatti's oratorio
' Santa Teodosia,' two copies of which are in
the Biblioteca Palatina of Modena, and bear the
signature ' A. S.'
Stradella's name has lately been invested with
fresh interest on account of a Serenata attributed
to him, in which the subjects of many of the
pieces in ' Israel in Egypt ' exist in a more or
less crude form. [See vol. i. p. 49 ; ii. 25.] A
copy of this, formerly belonging to Dr. Gauntlett,
is in the Library of the Royal College of Music,
London, and another (older) in that of the Con
servatoire, Paris : the original is not known. For
12 'Scielta delle suonate a due violin! con il Basso continue per
TOrgano, raccolte da diversi eccellenti autori.' In Bologna per
Giacomo Monti 1680. With the exception of this Sonata, no other of
Stradella's compositions was printed in the 17th century.
13 ' Supplement a la Biographie universelle,' Paris 1853.
14 Dizionario e Bibliografia della Musica del D. Pietro Lichtenthal.
Milano, 1826.
15 The following is the list of books in which the names of Stradella's
operas should have been mentioned, if any of them had been per
formed. Leone Allacci, ' Drammaturgia.' Groppo, ' Catalogo di
tutti i drammi per musica." Bonlini, ' Le glorie della Poesia e della
Musica.' C. F. Menestrier, ' Des representations en musique ancienne
et moderne'; Paris, 1681. Pietro Napoli Signorelli, ' Storia critica de
teatri antichi e moderni.' Ditto, 'Discorso storico critico da servire
di lume alia storia dei teatri.'
J6 Performed at Modena 1686, and possibly at Bologna 1682.
3 A2
724
STRADELLA.
STRADIVARI.
Can-
PEINTED.
Cosi amor mi fai languir.
zonetta.
Medea. Cantata.
II Nerone. Cantata.
O del mio dolce ardor. Aria.i
Se i miei sospiri. Ariadichiesa
Anco in cielo. Aria.
Se nel ben sempre. Arietta.
MANUSCRIPT.
1. In the Harleian Library.
Se nel ben sempre. Arietta. 2
Ste'le non mi tradite. Cantata.
La ragion ni assicura. Duetto.
Se t'ama, Filli, o cor. Arietta.
a review of the work, by Mr. Prout, see ' Monthly
Musical Record,' Dec. I, 1871.
Burney (iv. 105) gives an analysis of his
Oratorio di S. Gio. Battista, and mentions a MS.
of his opera 'La Forza dell' Amor paterno,'
dated Genoa, 1578.
There are 148 of Stradella's compositions at Mo-
dena : amongst them 6 oratorios and 1 1 dramas.
The library of S. Marco in Venice possesses a
collection of ' Canti a voce sola dell' insigne A.
Stradella, legate alia Biblioteca S. Marco di
Venezia dalla nobile famiglia Contarini.' Some
of his compositions are also at the Conservatorio
at Naples, and some in that at Paris. The
Christchurch Library, Oxford, contains I motet
for 2 voices, and 8 cantatas for i and 2 voices.
The following are in the British Museum.
Chi dira' che nel veleno. Can
tata.
2. Add. MSS.
Troppo grave. Duetto.
Ahi che in sentirlo. Duetto.
La povera mia t'e- Duetto.
Pupillette amorose. Madrigal a 5.
Clori son fido amante. Do.
Piangete occhi dolenti. Do.
E' pur giunta. Madrigal a 3.
Tirsi un giorno piangea. Do. a 5.
Feritemi, feritemi. Do. a 4.
Colpa de' bei vostr" occhi. Do.
Aure fresche. Do. for 2 voices.
A Sonata tor two violins and basso
[G.M.]
STRADELLA. i. French Ivric drama, music
by Flotovv. Produced at the Palais Royal theatre,
Paris, Feb. 1837. Then recomposed, as a Grand
Opera, and produced at Hamburg, Dec. 30, 1844,
as 'Alessandro Stradella.' In English (altered
by Bunn), as 'Stradella,' at Drury Lane, June 6,
1846. 2. Opera in 5 acts, by Niedermeyer ; pro
duced at the Acade'mie, March 3, 1837. [G.]
STRADIVARI, ANTONIO (ANTONIUS STRA.-
DiVARius3), a celebrated violin-maker of Cre
mona, born in 1649 or 1650,* died December
1737. The name carries us back to the middle
ages. It is the plural form of Stradivare, a
Lombard variety of Stradiere (Stratiarius), a
toll-man or douanier, a feudal official who was
posted on the strada or high-road for the purpose
of exacting dues from passengers. The name is
erroneously stated by Fe*tis to occur in the muni
cipal archives of Cremona as far back as the
year 1127. The earliest mention of it is in
fact in the Matricola of the Collegio Dei Notai
for 1213, after which date it frequently recurs
i Attributed to Stradella, but written by Gluck. 2 Doubtful
3 Until his latest years (1730-1736) the name is spelt on the labels
with a cursive v(u), 'Stradiuarius,' whence the vulgar English pro
nunciation ' Straduarius.' On the labels of the latest years the name
is spelt with a Roman v. Francesco, the son, used the Roman v.
4 In the books anterior to Fe"tis, the date of birth is given as 1664
Fe"tis altered the date to 1644, on the authority of a MS. inventory
of property belonging to Count Cozio de Salabue, which had been
deposited with Carli, a banker at Milan. One item in this inventory
is stated to be a violin of Stradivari, having an autograph ticket
giving the maker's name, his age (92 years), and the date (1736).
F^tis had never seen this instrument: and it is evident there had
been some error in reading or copying the figures. Mr. Wiener has a
genuine dated violin, and the ticket has the following inscription :
'Antonius Stradivarius Cremonensis Faciebat Anno 1732.' Below,
iu the maker's autograph, is plainly written ' de Anni 82.' It clearly
follows from this that Stradivari was born in 1649 or 1650. Mr. W. E.
Hill, to whom the writer owes the suggestion of the true date of
birth, states that in the course of business he has seen other dated
violins which confirm the above conclusion.
during three centuries. Arisi, in his ' Cremona
Litterata,' mentions Galerio Stradivari as a learned
orientalist in 1230, Alessandro as another orien
talist in 1400, about which time Costanzo Stra
divari, a monk of the order of Umiliati, wrote a
treatise on the natural philosophy of Aristotle.
Other notables of the name occur in the middle
ages. It is clear that it was a common name
in Cremona : but there is no evidence to con
nect the fiddle-maker with these eminent per
sons. His pedigree, so far as we know it, goes
back cmly to Ms father, one Alessandro Stradi
vari, who married Anna Moroni. The famous
fiddle-maker was the child of his father's mature
years, for he had at least one elder brother,
Giuseppe Giulio Cesare, who was born March 20,
1623, and was thus not less than 26 years older
than Antonio. Whether Stradivari was a native
of Cremona is doubtful; probably not, for the
registers of the 37 parishes of Cremona have
been searched in vain for evidence of his birth
and baptism by Signore Lombardini, who has
taken great pains to elucidate the genealogy of
the Stradivaris. He may possibly have been a
native of some neighbouring village.
At the age of 17 or 18, Stradivari seems to
have engaged the affections of a widow 9 or 10
years his senior. This was Francesca, the daugh
ter of Francesco Ferraboschi, and widow of Gio
vanni Giacomo Capra, who was assassinated by
an arquebus ball on the Piazza Santa Agata of
Cremona (now the Piazza, Garibaldi), April 28,
1664. The widow Capra, who had been less than
two years a wife, returned with her infant child
to her father's house, and after three years was
married to Antonio Stradivari. The marriage
was solemnised in the church of St. Agatha on
July 4, 1667; and their first child was born a few
months afterwards. There can be little doubt
that Stradivari married, and began to make
stringed instruments as a trade, in the same year.
From 1667 to 1679 ne remained in comparative
obscurity. A few violins dated in the seventies,
with genuine labels bearing his name, are said to
exist, but the writer has seen none of them. On
the other hand, it is certain that Stradivari's
hand is traceable in many violins of this date
which bear the name of Nicholas Amati. In
some of these we trace the hand of Stradivari in
the scroll only : in others it has left its mark
on the whole violin. From 1667 to 1679 ^ *s
therefore probable that Stradivari worked in
the workshop of the veteran Nicholas Amati,
then the acknowledged head of violin-nlaking
in Cremona. In 1679, when Nicholas seems
to have retired from business, five years before
his death in i684,5 Stradivari probably set up
for himself. His wife Francesca had by this
time borne him six children, of whom five
were living: Giulia, born Dec. 23, 1667, after
wards married to the notary Giovanni Farina ;
Francesco, who died in infancy ; Francesco the
second, born 1670, who followed his father's trade,
and died a bachelor in 1 743 ; Cattarina, born
5 He was then aged 88: about the same age as that attained by
Stradivari.
STRADIVARI.
1674, wh° died a spinster in 1748 ; Alessandro,
born 1677, became a priest, died 1732; and
lastly Omobono, born 1679, w^° a^so flowed his
father's trade, arid died a bachelor in 1742.
In 1680, at the age of 30 or 31, Stradivari
purchased the house now known as no. i Piazza
Roma, but formerly known as no. 2 Piazza San
Domenico, where for half a century and more he
continued to carry on business, and where he
built the innumerable instruments which have
made his name a household word wherever
stringed music is heard. He bought the house
of the brothers Picenavdi for 7000 imperial lire :
the conveyance is dated June 3. The house is
a plain structure of three storeys, situate at the
south-western angle of the piazza, which was for
merly bounded on the north by the greaj; church
of S. Domenico, and from which the piazza took
its name. This church has now been pulled
down, the piazza being thus considerably en
larged, and the whole space enclosed and con
verted into a public garden. On the ground-floor
the house consists of two apartments, one fronting
the piazza, the other opening into a little court
yard : a staircase at right angles on the left gives
access to the upper storeys. Following the com
mon practice of Italian artisans, Stradivari pro
bably employed both the ground-floor rooms as
workshops, and lived in the upper part with his
wife and family, which, when he bought the house
in 1680, consisted of his five children, the eldest
girl 12 years of age, and of Susanna Capra, his
wife's only daughter by her former marriage, then
a girl of 17. Susanna resided with her mother
and step-father at the house in the Piazza Roma,
until December 1688, when she became the wife
of Francesco Luca.
The period of Stradivari's first marriage lasted
10 years longer. On May 20, 1698, Francesca
died, at the age of 58. Stradivari was then 48
or 49 : and after the lapse of a little more than
a year, he took unto himself a second wife. This
was Antonia, daughter of Antonio Zambelli : the
coincidence of names is curious. Antonia was 14
or 15 years younger than her husband, having
been born on June u, 1664: they were married
at the'church of San Donate on Aug. 24, 1699. By
his second marriage Antonio had five children :
Francesca, born 1700, died 1720; Giovanni B.
Giuseppe, born 1701, died in infancy; Giovanni
B. Martino, born 1703, died 1727; Giuseppe,
bom 1 704, became a priest, and died at the age
of 77 in 1781; and lastly Paolo, born 1708.
Paolo was the only son of Stradivari who had
issue, and it is through him that the present
representatives of the family" trace their descent.
Antonia Stradivari survived three of her children,
and died at the age of 73 on March 3, 1 737. Her
husband survived her only nine months, when lie
followed her to the grave at the ripe age of 87
or 88. He died on Dec. 18, and was buried on
the following day. In 1729 he had purchased a
burial-place in the great basilica of San Domenico.
It had formerly belonged to Francesco Villani,
who was buried there in 1721. £11729 the heirs
of Villani sold it to Stradivari. It was situated
STRADIVARI.
725
in the Chapel of the Rosary, on the left hand of
the entrance. The economical habits of the
fiddle-maker are illustrated . by the fact that he
had the old stone recut, the new inscription
being cut at right angles to the old one, parts
of which are still legible. When the basilica of
San Domenico was demolished to make the new
public garden, the stone which marked the
burial-place of the Stradivaris was spared, and
it is still preserved in the vaults of the Palazzo
dei Tribunali.
SEPOLCRO VS
DI
1
i
T^~
C/3
\Q
W
hH
ANTONI STRADIVARI
E SVOI EREDI
td
ANNO 1729
SO
Stradivari marks the culminating point of the
art of making stringed instruments. It was he
who perfected the model of the violin and its
fittings. No improvement has been made since
his time, and subsequent makers of the last cen
tury and a half have mostly copied him. The
model of Cremona had been developing for nearly
two centuries, when he gave it its final form.
It is true that if we take the model of the
Cremona violin as it left the hands of Antonius
Amati, and compare it with the patterns of
Nicholas Amati and of Stradivari, we shall find
that Nicholas Amati had effected the chief im
provements, and left but little for Stradivari to
do. The Stradivari violin is an improved Nicholas
Amati. We liave the same main proportions
and geometrical outline, and, what is of equal
or greater importance, the same careful me
chanical work in the inside (the blocks and linings
being made and fitted on the same principle and
with wood of the same quality), the same fine
finish, and soft lustrous varnish. But in the
Nicholas Amati, though sweet and resonant in
tone, acoustic considerations did not predomi
nate over certain of the traditions of design :
and in this respect his successor had several
reforms to effect. Stradivari's main improve
ments consisted (i ) In lowering the height of the
model, that is, the arch of the belly, and in alter
ing this flattened curve to a more uniform arch,
so as to afford greater resistance to the pressure
of the strings. (2) In making the four corner
blocks more massive, in an improved method of
dove-tailing the linings at the blocks, and in
giving a greater curvature to the middle ribs,
726
STRADIVARI.
the result of which is to make the curves more
prominent in the outline, and to increase the
tension of the parts. (3) In altering the set
ting of the soundholes, giving them a decided
inclination to each other at the top, thus fol
lowing the general upward diminution of the
pattern, and in fixing the position of the sound-
holes relatively to the cornerblocks. (4) In
making the scroll more massive and prominent,
thus rendering it less liable to split at the peg-
holes, and forming more of a counterpoise in
the hand of the player.
In those violins of Nicholas Amati in which
the hand of Stradivari is traceable, the chief
element of difference consists in the scroll. This
is wider when viewed from the back, is less
deeply scooped in the volute, and more rounded
on the edges. The soundholes are still those of
Amati, though with a slight difference in the
cutting. In his own earlier works, sold under
the name of Amati, but made in all their parts
by Stradivari, we begin to trace the improve
ments just indicated. ' At this point,' says
Mr. Hart ('The Violin/ p. 126), 'we find that
his whole work is in accordance with the plans
of Amati (not as seen in the latter's ' grand '
pattern, but in his ordinary full-sized instru
ment) : the arching is identical, the corners are
treated similarly, the soundhole is quite Amati-
like in form, yet easily distinguished by its ex
treme delicacy, the scroll a thorough imitation
of Amati, and presenting a singular contrast to
the vigorous individuality which Stradivarius
displayed in this portion of his work a few years
later. . , In these earlier specimens there is a
singular absence of handsome wood : the acous
tical properties of the material are very good,
but it has little figure in it, and is often cut on
the cross.' This cutting on the cross, which
refers only to the back, is seldom met with in
Stradivari's later instruments, and it would ap
pear that he found 'slab' backs inconsistent
with that depth of tone which he desired. Such
are the marks of what the French call the ama-
tis6 Stradivarius. These instruments were made
during the lifetime of Nicholas Amati, when
none of his pupils ventured to deviate much
from his pattern, and before Stradivari opened
his own workshop in the Piazza San Domenico.
We now reach the period when Stradivari
had attained maturity of experience, and freed
himself from the influence of his master, and
consequently began to display his own origin
ality. This period corresponds exactly with the
period between his taking his house in the
Piazza San Domenico, and the death of his first
wife (1680-1698). Of the violins of this period
Mr. Hart ('The Violin,' p. 127) says, 'We here
observe a marked advance in every particular.
The form is flatter, the arching differently treated.
The soundhole, which is a masterpiece of grace
fulness, reclines more. The curves of the middle
bouts are more extended than in this maker's
later instruments. The corners are brought out,
although not prominently so. Here, too, we
notice the change in the formation of the scroll.
STRADIVARI.
He suddenly leaves the form that he had hitherto
imitated, and follows thef dictates of his own
fancy. . . The varnish is very varied. Sometimes
it is of a rich golden colour, deliciously soft and
transparent: in other instances he has used
varnish of a deeper hue, which might be de
scribed as light red, the quality of which is also
very beautiful. We find this varnish chiefly on
those instruments where he has made his backs
in two parts, and also on whole backs. The
purfling is narrower than that afterwards used.'
This second period (1680-1698) is that of
Stradivari's established reputation. The repute
of Cremona for violins was European. Nicholas
Amati had long been at the head of the trade :
but he had in 1680 ceased to make violins, his
workshop was bi'oken up, and his son, the second
Girolamo of the family, though a respectable
maker, did not succeed to his father's position.
From the moment when Stradivari opened his
violin factory in 1680, the principal purchasers
seem to have resorted to it : and in a year or
two his fame was widely spread. Early in 1684
we find among his customers the Countess Cris-
tina Visconti, and no less a person than the
Grand Duke of Florence himself. For the former
lady he made a viola da gamba 'alia gobba'
(i.e. hunchbacked, the upper part of the flat
back being sloped off) with violoncello scroll and
soundholes.1 Stradivari, it is probable, was the
first to effect this improvement in the viola da
gamba. The Double Bass had long been made
with violoncello soundholes (i. e. having contrary
flexures), which were rendered necessary by the
increased height of the model. Though we have
none of Stradivari's violas da gamba, we have
those of contemporary makers who followed his
general models : and these are high in the belly,
like the double-bass, have violoncello sound-
holes, and nearly approximate in their propor
tions to a reduced double-bass. For the Grand
Duke of Tuscany he made a complete set (con
certo) of instruments later in the same year.
This concerto probably consisted of two or per
haps three violins, a contralto or small tenor
(viola piccola a quattro corde), a tenore or large
tenor (viola piu grande) and a violoncello. The
designs for the cases of this concerto, drawn
by Stradivari's hand, including the locks and
fastenings, are numbered 30 in the Marquis Delia
Valle's collection, and are labelled thus, in Stradi
vari's autograph: 'Modelli fatti alle Casse del
Concerto de instrument! che mandati all' gran
ducca di Fiorenza dell' Anno 1684 li 24 giugno.'
The designs for the shields, which are surmounted
by a ducal crown, with angels as supporters, are
entitled also in the maker's autograph, ' Armi
chi ho fatto per li istrumenti per il gran Principe
di Toscana.' These autographs reveal some curi
ous facts. One is, that Stradivari did not disdain
to design and execute with his own hand the
inlaid ornaments, fittings, and cases of his instru-
i The paper models of this instrument are in the Marquis Delia
Valle's collection. They are numbered 2(5 and inscribed ' 1684, 23
Feb. Antn. Stradivari. Modelli della Viola da Gamba alia cobba
fatta p. la S"-a Conta Cristina Visconti col ricchio e li occhietti da
Violoncello.'
STRADIVARI.
ments. The ornaments of the numerous instru
ments which he sent out inlaid with ebony and
ivory were designed and executed by himself,
and when finished he made rubbings of them for
future use. A parcel of these, labelled ' Disegni
delli intagli fatti sulli Violini, Violoncelli,' etc.,
and consisting of rubbings from the sides of
scrolls and from ribs, forms no. 29 in the Delia
Valle collection : and another parcel, consisting of
cartridge paper models made for the metal locks
and flap -staples for cases, is labelled 'Disegni e
modelli di Serrature e cordini di Cassette.' , The
collection also includes Stradivari's tools for im
pressing arabesques, ' Stampiti per arabeschi.'
Another fact revealed by these autographs is
that Stradivari spelt, and probably spoke, his
native tongue very imperfectly. In the year
1687 Stradivari executed another order for an
ornamented concerto of instruments. This con
certo was made for the Spanish crown, and the
violoncello is still in the possession of the King
of Spain. The instruments were inlaid with
ivory in the purfling, with intaglio work on the
sides and scroll. A violin of this concerto,
formerly belonging to Ole Bull, and afterwards
in the collection of Mr. Charles Plowden, is
engraved in Mr. Hart's book, plate 18. Mr.
Hart describes this set of instruments as a
4 quatuor,' but it probably consisted of at least
five, like that of the Grand Duke of Tuscany,
there being two violas, one a contralto, the other
a tenor.
As Stradivari notes on some of his patterns
that the instruments were made expressly to order
('alia posta,' or in some cases 'espressamente,1) it
may be inferred that he also kept up a stock for
general sale. It seems that when he received
an order for a new instrument from a customer
of distinction, he would sometimes design an
entirely new model, construct a wooden mould
(forma) in accordance with the design, and make
a complete set of working drawings, embracing
the scroll, handle, soundholes, corners, bridge,
and tailpiece. Each mould (a block of maple
somewhat less than an inch in thickness, with
spaces left in the outlines for the corner and
top and bottom blocks), was carefully dated and
marked with a letter or letters indicating the
character of the pattern. The working draw
ings were marked with the same letters, and
put away for future use. Thus a mould for a
long tenor of the smaller pattern is dated ' A di
4 Ottobre 1690,' and marked CV. It is de
scribed, ' Forma nuova per il Contralto ossia
Viola a quattro corde fatta alia posta per il
Gran Principe di Toscana ossia di Firenze.'
(Delia Valle Collection, no. 2.) The working
drawings are dated four days later, and labelled
thus : ' 1690, 4° 8bre in Cremona, Antonio
Stradivario. Misurep.li manici occhietti cantoni
topette ponticelli e cordeli p. il Contraldo ossia
Viola picola fatta espressamente p. il gran
Principe della Toscana sulla forma CV.' Con
currently with this contralto Stradivari designed
a large tenor on a similar principle : and it is not
improbable that this contralto and tenor were
STRADIVARI.
727
members of a second complete concerto of instru
ments for which he had received an order. The
drawings for the large tenor, dated the same day,
are labelled thus: '1690 4 8bre in Cremona.
Antonio Stradivario. Misure p. li manici oc
chietti cantoni e topette ponticelli tavolette e
cordeli p. il Tenore ossia Viola piu grande fatta
espressamente p. il gran Principe della Toscana
sulla forma TV.' The lettering CV and TV on
these moulds evidently means ' Contralto Viola'
and 'Tenore Viola.' Probably the maker in
tended these patterns to be his standing models,
his contralto and tenor violas par excellence.
A separate drawing for the soundholes of the
contralto is inscribed ' Musura giusta per il occhi
dello contrato fatto alia posta per il Gran
Principe di Toscana A di 4 Octob. 1690' (no. 18).
The Della Valle collection includes another
tenor mould and no less than eleven violin moulds.
One of the latter is marked ' SL ' and dated 'A
di 9 Nov. 1691 ' (no. 3). This is long and
narrow : ' SL ' probably stands for ' Stretto Lungo.'
Another (no. 6) is marked ' B,' and dated ' 1692.'
B probably stands for 'Basso,' or 'flat' model.
This mould of the ' B ' pattern was the maker's
favourite. The surface of the mould is worn
away with much use, and there is a memorandum
that the maker used it for a violin as late as
1736, his 86th or 87th year. Another (no. 7)
is also marked ' B,' and dated 'A di 3 Giugno
1692.' Two others (nos. I and 5) are dated
several years later : the first is marked ' S '
(stretto), and inscribed 'Adi 20. 1 703. Settembre';
the other marked 'P,' and dated 'A 25 Feb. 1 705,'
with the maker's name 'Antonio Stradivari,' is
somewhat shorter and more confined in design
than usual, and the ' P ' evidently stands for
'Piccolo' (small pattern). Another violin mould
is marked 'T' with no date (no. 4). There is also
a mould for a child's violin with the blocks at
tached, accompanied by an exquisite drawing
of the belly on cartridge paper.
These long and narrow moulds, dated after 1690,
lead us to an innovation in the pattern peculiar to
Stradivari among the classical makers. It was
about this time that he began to make instru
ments of greater length, which the French call
' longuets,' and known in England as 'long Strads.'
Mr. Hart says of these, ' We have a totally dif
ferently constructed instrument : it is less graceful,
although there is no absence of the masterly
hand throughout the work. It has received the
title of "long Strad," not from increased length,
as its name would imply, but from the appearance
of additional length which its narrowness gives
it, and which is particularly observable between
the soundholes.' This excellent critic of violins
here appears to fall into a slight confusion.
These observations apply to the narrow violins
made on the 'S' or 'Stretto' (narrow) moulds, of
the normal length, but diminished breadth. These
are less uncommon than the true ' long Strad'
(Lungo), specimens of which the writer has seen ;
they are of the normal width or only a trifle
under it, and at least a quarter of an inch longer
than the normal length, this extra length being
728
STEADIVARI.
equally distributed on either side of the bridge.
The neck requires to be lengthened in the same
proportion ; hence the stop becomes appreciably
longer. The true ' long Strads' are remarkable for
power of tone, but are for the above reason less
easily handled : and hence the pattern never
came into general use. Some, if not all of them,
were probably made on the 'SL' (Stretto Lungo)
mould of 1691 : one very fine specimen, formerly
in the possession of Lord Falmouth, is dated
1692. The 'SL' pattern was occasionally used by
the maker in his mature years, but is less fre
quent after 1700.
The nineties were with Stradivari a decade of
bold experiment in other respects. Sometimes
he altered the curves of the back and belly ;
occasionally he innovated in the thicknesses, some
of his experiments, as more than one purchaser
of a handsome and unspoiled violin knows to his
cost, being sufficiently unfortunate. He made
some violins with bellies so thin that they are
useless for the higher pitch and increased pressure
of modern playing, and must either be fortified
with new wood or laid on the shelf as curiosities.
These various experiments enabled the maker
to fix definitely the principles on which the
fiddles of his third arid best period (1698-1728)
are designed.
This third period includes the greater part of
the known instruments of Stradivari, and these
are in all respects his best. The culminating
point of his work may be fixed at the year 1714,
which is the date of the celebrated ' Dolphin '
Stradivari, once the property of M. Alard,
afterwards of Mr. Adam. ' From about 1 700,'
writes Mr. Hart, p. 131, 'his instruments show
to us much of what follows later. The outline
is changed, but the curves blending into one
another are beautiful in the extreme. The cor
ners are treated differently. The wood used for
the backs and sides is most handsome, having a
broad curl. The scrolls are of bold conception,
and finely executed.' It must be noted, however,
that the differences of construction between this
third and best period, and the preceding, are
minute in the extreme. The modelling is much
the same, the size and general design remain
unaltered. Stradivari, in fact, kept the actual
moulds (forme) of the preceding period constantly
in use. It is true that he added new ones to his
stock, e.g. that dated 1705 above mentioned.
But it is obvious that his old 'B' (basso, flat)
moulds were constantly in use : the majority ot'
the violins of this last period seem to have been
made from at most two or three moulds. The
rapidity of his production was astonishing. In
1702, as we learn from the MSS. of Desiderio
Arisi, he made two violins and a violoncello by
order of the Governor of Cremona, to be sent as
presents to the Duke of Alba. In 1707 the Mar
quis Desiderio Cleri sent by order of Charles III.
of Spain a commission to Stradivari to make six
•violins, two tenors, and one violoncello for the
royal orchestra. In the same year he made for
the Countess Cristina Visconti a new viola da
gamba alia gobba. The cartridge patterns for
STRADIVARI.
the neck of this he put away thus labelled
' Musura del manico del Violoncello Ordinario,
manicho della longezza della Viola della Signora
Cristina Visconti fatta in 1707.' From this it
would appear that he considered this viola da
gamba neck equally adapted to the ordinary
violoncello, from which it would follow that the
body was of the size of an ordinary violoncello,
or considerably larger than the ordinary viola
da gamba. In 1716 he made new models for a
violoncello (Della Valle Collection, no. 16), per
haps the same which in this year, according to
the Arisi MSS., he made for the Duke of Mo-
dena. In the same year he made a twelve-
stringed viola d'amore (six gut strings, and six
wire strings), the pattern of which he inscribed
' Modelli della Viola d'Amore a 1 2 Corde fatti
nell mese cli Cienaio dell' anno Bisestile mdccxvi.'
This is a choice specimen of Stradivari's spelling:
by 'Cienaio' he means 'Gennaio,' or January.
A choicer one still, in which the grammar rivals
the spelling, is the inscription on the patterns of
some instrument made for the Marquis Car-
bonelli : ' Qui dentro quest! desingni che sono
qui dentro sforati sono quelli che se fatto al
lll'mo. Sig. Marchese Carbonelli di Mantova'
(Della Valle Collection, no. 27).1 In 1720
Stradivari made a concerto of instruments (pro
bably two violins, two tenors, and a violoncello),
which he intended as a present for the King of
Spain on the occasion of his passing through
Cremona. He was dissuaded from executing this
intention, and the instruments remained in his
possession.
During this final period, 1700-1728, we find
little variation in the general pattern and dimen
sions of Stradivari's instruments. He probably
used only two or three moulds. Such variation
as there is lies chiefly in the breadth, a few
violins, probably made on the ' S ' moulds, being
narrower than the average. As a specimen of
this, his best period, a beautiful violin dated
1 The supposed autograph letter of Stradivari, a facsimile of
which forms the IVoutispiece to the work of M. 1'elis, is appaieutly
a lorgery.
STRADIVARI.
1708, the property of Dr. William Hugging,
F.R.S. has been selected for illustration.
From 1725 to 1730 (between the maker's 75th
and Soth years) his instruments are generally
supposed to deteriorate. There are certainly
many bearing his name very different from those
of the maker's prime. The model is somewhat
higher, the result being less brilliancy in th£
tone : the scroll and the wood generally is
heavier, the varnish is darker, and the work less
finished. For the following equally artistic and
scientific comparison of the violin of 1708 with
one of 1726, which may be taken as fair speci
mens of the second and third periods respectively,
the writer is indebted to the joint labours of
Dr. Huggins, F.R.S., and Mrs. Huggins.
'The violin of 1708 weighs £ lb., that of 1726
I lb. The fittings may have something to do
with this difference; but the 1726 violin is
heavier in itself. The violin of 1 708 has higher
sides and flatter curves in the belly and back
than that of 1726. The general form of the
1 708 violin is much more masterly than that of
the 1726 one, which is rather " waspy " looking.
The parts of the form of the 1708 violin are
"brought thoroughly well together," as an artist
would say ; and it gives the idea of being at once
larger and more powerful and at the same time
more graceful than the 1726 instrument. As a
matter of fact the two violins are of almost the
same form and size, as they fit nicely into the
same case.1 There can be no doubt, however,
as to the artistic justice of the above observations,
and the matter is an excellent illustration of how
much form depends upon very delicate modifica
tions of line — modifications which it will almost
baffle even a trained eye to detect at any one
point, but which in the aggregate tell at a glance.
An art homologue occurs in delicate painting,
where refined modifications of colour must be
effected by touches which the painter can only
feel he is laying on, but cannot see until, after a
time, he becomes conscious of a subtle change of
colour where he has been working.
'The purfling of the 1726 violin is much in
ferior to that of the 1708 one. The backs of
both violins are in one piece, but the back wood
of the 1726 one is small and insignificant in
"curl" and in markings generally. The wood
of the belly of the 1726 one is in two pieces.
'The tone of the 1726 violin is quite without
the grandeur and brilliancy of that of 1708.
There is no reserve of force about that of the
1726 one: the tone seems to come all at once,
and very readily. It has much beauty, without
having beauty of such commanding quality that
at once one is led captive. It is almost all music,
but not without just a trace of what is very
noticeable in some early Stradivarius violins, viz.
a certain confusion of utterance of any given note
as if (to borrow the language of optics) the tone
had not all " come to focus " perfectly. No deep
many-sided nature could find complete satisfac
tion in the tone of the 1726 violin, its capacity
i This is apparently the result of iheir being made in the same
mould.
STRADIVARI.
729
for response to varying mental states is. too
limited.
' The /-holes and the scroll in the 1708 violin
are much more subtle and free in. curve than
those of the 1726 one. The subtlety of curve
makes them of course interesting, for the interest
of form depends largely upon the stimulating
mysteriousness which arises when they vary from
the simple curve. The freedom of the curve is
also an important factor in the pleasure induced
by the sight of a fine violin : such freedom con
veying the idea of masterly ease, and the eye
being carried on without the irritating checks
occasioned by lines wanting in freedom. There
is however freedom and freedom. The freedom
of Stradivarius at his best is as the freedom of
Gothic architecture, not as that of Classical, it
impresses one as an expression of unfettered
aspiration not of ordered repetition. The scroll
of the 1708 violin would not go so well with the
1726 violin as its own scroll. Stradivarius seems
to have been an artist gifted with rare powers of
harmony as well as of melody in form ; i. e. every
part of his violins is always in perfect keeping
with the rest. Upon the whole the form of the
1726 violin may be said to show a very consider
able decadence from that of 1708.'
How far Stradivari is personally responsible
for this decadence it is now impossible to say.
The fashion of the period, preferring the Stainer
model, perhaps demanded greater height in the
belly and back, and greater massiveness in the
wood : and it is certain that to some of these
instruments he refused the direct authorisation
of his name. In many instruments of this period
the label of Stradivari is inserted ; but in others
of them a ticket appears, indicating, as the fact is,
that these violins were made under his general
direction by other hands (' sub disciplina Antonii
Stradiuarii, Crernonae, 17 ,' in very small type).
The workmanship of these instruments is generally
attributable to his sons Omobono and Francesco.
Occasionally, however, we have a genuine product
of the great master's old age, such as the fine violin
belonoing to Mr. Wiener, dated 1732, 'de Anni
82.' The productivity of Stradivari in the latter
half of his life has been mentioned. There cannot
be much less than a thousand of his instruments,
most of them of this period, still existing, and of
the ordinary kind — violins, tenors, and basses.
Some have disappeared: e.g. we know that he
made many violas da gamba, though none of them,
so far as the writer knows, are in existence/5
We know that he also made a great number of
kits, guitars, lutes, theorbos, lyres, and man
dolins, which having become curiosities, are not
frequently in the channel of trade. For all
these instruments he made fittings and cases.
On the fittings he bestowed peculiar pains. The
Delia Valle collection contains several of his
tailpieces which were never used. These are of
maple, carefully proportioned, of an oblong shape,
and finely finished. They are apparently made
out of blocks of wood similar to fingerboards.
2 The Museum of the Paris Conservatoire contains a beaut iful
fragment of the head of a viola da garnba of Stradivari (No. 111).
730
STRADIVARI.
STRADIVARI.
His fingerboards were also of maple, and were
sometimes handsomely inlaid. Some specimens
of bis fittings, removed from, the instruments by
Vuillaume and Gand, were presented by them
to the Museum of the Paris Conservatoire, where
they may still be seen (nos. 6, 10, 114, 115).
In another important detail of the violin,
the bridge, Stradivari effected the final im
provement : and it may be said that he has a
monument in every violin bridge in the world.
Before the Amatis, the bridge had been cut
almost at haphazard. The Amatis reduced it
to something approaching the present normal
form (see the engravings in Fe"tis, Antoine Stra
divari, p. 95), but Stradivari made the final
alteration. This consisted in abandoning, for
the lower half of the bridge, the principle of
the arch, and substituting for it a firm bar rest
ing 011 a foot near each end. The upper part of
the bridge is an arch, formed by the 'heart' or
central hole ; and by means of the massive bar
below, the vibrations excited by the strings in
this arched upper part are regulated, and trans
mitted by the feet to the body of the instru
ment. Slight as the improvement seems, it was
a great discovery : and since his time the form
of the bridge lias never been changed. [See
BRIDGE.] So important is the bridge to the
violin, that had Stradivari effected nothing else,
this would have been sufficient to make him
famous. Another great service which he rendered
to violin-making consisted infixing the exact shape
of the soundholes and their relation to the corner
blocks. Fortunately we have preserved in the
Delia Valle collection (no. 25), in the great
maker's own autograph, his rule for placing the
soundholes. It is inscribed ' Regola per collo-
care le ff delli Violini, Viole, Violoncelli.' The
explanation of this is, that it was one of the
fixed principles of Stradivari, in which he dif
fered from his predecessors, that the same laws
governed the proportions of all members of the
violin family, as
distinguished from
the viol family,
which includes the
viola dagamba and
double-bass, and is
governed by other
proportions. The
diagram is adapted
to the mould <P,'
which, as noted
above, indicates
' Piccolo ' or ' small
pattern,' and was
made on Feb. 25,
1705.
This diagram af
fords an interesting
problem to students of the mechanism of the
violin. Whatever the rule may be, the sound-
holes of Stradivari are all traced in accordance
with it. The writer has his own solution of the
problem, but it would be out of place in the pre
sent article.
The fine tone and the lasting wear of Stradi
vari's instruments undoubtedly depend on the
thoroughness with which the mechanical part
of the work is executed. A good violin is like
a good watch : all its ' works ' must be of per
fect materials, and accurately put together.
Nothing could be more perfect than the internal
finish of the violins of Stradivari. The wood
selected is solid, sound, and sonorous. The pine
is of the best quality from Switzerland and the
Trentino : the thicknesses and the lines of the
pattern are all determined with scientific ac
curacy: the inner framework, consisting of the
blocks and linings, is of willow from the banks
of the Po about Cremona. It is solidly con
structed, and the bridge and soundholes are so
arranged as to produce by its aid a powerful
vibration of the belly under the strings. The
external finish equally exhibits marks of high
mechanical excellence. The purfling is executed
with a precision which cannot be appreciated
without a magnifying glass. The lines are ad
mirably firm and perfect, and fully display that
mastery of curves in which Stradivari was pre
eminent. And here may be noticed a singular
freak in which the great maker occasionally in
dulged. Instead of cutting the several outlines
of the fiddle and those of the scroll and sound-
holes to the usual curves, Stradivari in some in
stances made these outlines polygonal, being
composed of a series of short straight lines. The
purfling follows the polygonal outline, and is also
polygonal. It is hard to see what motive he
can have had in producing these singular in
struments, except to show his extraordinary
skill as a purfler. Viewed from a certain dis
tance, these instruments exhibit the ordinary
appearance. The Marquis Delia Valle has a
viola, and Mr. Vonwiller, a violin, of this pe
culiar pattern.
The varnish used by Stradivari in his earlier
years is similar to that of Nicholas Amati, in
texture and in the method of applying it. In
colour there is this difference, that Stradivari
avoids the favourite brownish tint of Amati,
and generally employs a more or less pronounced
yellow. It is oil varnish of a soft and penetrating
nature, apparently permeating the wood to some
depth beneath the surface, so that when the
body of the varnish is worn off the colour and
substance appear to remain. After 1684 he
began to use a thicker and more lustrous varnish
of a reddish tint ; and this colour he ultimately
employed to the exclusion of others. The staring
effect of the red tint on the back of the fiddle
seems to have suggested to Stradivari the device
of ' breaking up ' the varnish on the back, thus
imitating the effect of wear. When employed by
a skilful workman this device lends great addi
tional beauty to the work in the connoisseur's
eye : and the example has been generally fol
lowed. 'Breaking-up' is a peculiar and difficult
branch of the varnisher's art. Many good makers
have failed in it : next to Stradivari, Vuillaume
succeeded best. In the instruments of his latest
years Stradivari sometimes reverted to the brown
STRADIVARI.
STRADIVARI.
731
tint which was fashionable in his youth. These
may have been varnished by his son, whose in
struments generally exhibit this brown colour.
Stradivari occasionally gave his finest instru
ments several coats of fine pure oil varnish,
polishing each coat as soon as dry. Sometimes,
however, the coats are fewer and thinner, and the
writer has seen an instrument sent forth into the
world by the great maker with the size barely
covered. Perhaps the customer could not wait
for the varnishing. As a rule, however, the
Stradivari instruments are remarkable for ex
cellence of varnish. It is a fact not very
generally known that Stradivari occasionally
varnished his instruments with spirit-varnish.
This is much more easily applied and dries
more quickly than oil varnish, and from the
very general employment of it in the middle
of the last century, it would seem that most
violin-makers hailed its discovery as a boon.
The better class of makers tried it and aban
doned it, discovering probably that it did not
answer so well in the end, though cheaper, and
more easily applied.
Though Stradivari, as has been observed, made
instruments of all sorts, his fame rests on those
of the violin tribe, i. e. violins, violas and violon
cellos. A few of his kits exist : a fine specimen
is in the Museum of the Paris Conservatoire
(no. 61). It is of large size, and belongs to the
best period, being dated 1717. Clapisson, who
purchased it in 1858, introduced in his comic
opera ' Les trois Nicolas ' a gavotte specially
written for this instrument, the solo part in which
was played by Croisilles, and produced a singularly
brilliant effect. A remarkably fine mandolin with
a carved head, formerly the property of J. B.
Vuillaume, still exists in Paris. A beautiful
guitar of his make, dated 1680, was in this
country in 1881. The rose of the guitar being
filled with a mass of delicate tracery, in the style
of a circular flamboyant window, the inside is not
open to view, and the maker therefore cu t his name
with the knife on the back of the peg-box.1
O
n
AN T.'^TRADIVA
His larger instruments of the violin tribe
(violas and violoncellos) are liable to the charge
of being merely magnified fiddles. In this re
spect Stradivari set an example which was fol
lowed by other makers. However correct in
theory, it is commonly considered that as regards
the viola this principle is a failure ; for violas of
older models have a better effect in a quartet
than those of Stradivari. The tone is rich and
i For a facsimile of this interesting inscription the writer is in
debted to Mr. Arthur Hill, oi' the firm of Hill & Sons, Wardour
Street.
'thick,' but deficient in liquidity: this character
is evidently the result of shallowness in the ribs,
and consequent shortness in the soundpost. We
have, however, little opportunity of judging of the
effect of Stradivari's large violas, most of which
have been cut down to the size of the contralto.
Stradivari's theory broke down conspicuously
when he applied it to the violoncello. The
violoncello absolutely requires a greater height
in the ribs, in proportion to the length, than
the violin. Stradivari, in endeavouring to re
duce the violoncello in this respect to the pro
portions of the violin, sometimes made instru
ments which are very defective in tone, and can
only be cured by increasing the height of the
ribs. The violoncellos are of two sizes, and the
larger is now as scarce as the large violas. The
celebrated bass of Servais, now belonging to
M. Servais, jun., is a rare specimen. Those of
Signore Piatti and Herr Hausmnnn should also
be mentioned. The smaller basses are too nar
row, and their tone is thin, approaching that of
the viola da gamba. The violoncello of the
younger Duport, now in the possession of M.
Franchomme, is of this small pattern. These
smaller instruments are easier to handle, and nre
on that account preferred by some players. The
larger ones have a much finer tone. These
larger basses were originally constructed for use
in the concerto, whether ' da chiesa ' or 'da
camera,' the narrower ones being appropriated
to solo music.
Double-basses of Stradivaii are rare ; 2 and
there are probably at present none in this
country. Dragonetti had one, but it does not
appear to have been his favourite instrument.
Count Ludovico Melzi has a fine specimen, of
high model, and very broad. The lower angles
of the middle bouts are rounded off, apparently
to avoid injury.
The fine tone of the Stradivari violins testifies to
the substantial value of the improvements which
he effected in the pattern. It is invariably
bright, sweet, full and equable. It is also easily
yielded, or, in the common phrase, ' comes out '
freely under the bow. Nicholas Amati, and the
earlier Guarnieris, produced instruments which
charm by their softness rather than by their
power : in Joseph Guarnieri everything yields
to sonority and depth. But against all other
violins, a good Stradivari bears off the palm for
general excellence of tone, as well as for beauty
and durability : and all succeeding generations
of fiddle-makers have acknowledged the ex
cellence of the Stradivari model by copying it.
The majority of the violins made during the last
century and a half, of all sorts, from the best
productions of Lupot, Fendt, Pressenda, and ..
Vuillaume, down to the common fiddles of
Mirecourt and Neukirchen, manufactured by
the gross and sold for a few shillings, are Stradi
vari copies. The most accomplished maker can
invent nothing better: the dullest workman
2 Sig. Lombardini says Stradivari made ' ttna infnila di violini,
alquanti contrabass!, motti violoucelli, viole, chitarre. liuti e man-
dorle.'
732
STRADIVARI.
STRADIVARI.
cannot fail to make a tolerable fiddle, if he
follows his model as well as he can. But there
is a great gulf between the master and the best
of his imitators. No man who ever lived, dur
ing this century and a half, has been able to
make a fiddle which could possibly be mistaken
by a practised eye for the work of Stradivari.
Of the person of Stradivari we have some
traditional notices. According to Fe'tiSj Pol-
ledro, first violin in the royal orchestra at Turin,
to whose encouragement we owe the fine pro
ductions of Pressenda, used to say that his
master had known Stradivari, and was fond of
talking about him. Polledro's master was Pug-
nani, born in 1727, ten years only before Stradi
vari's death, and he could therefore only have
seen him as a child. According to him Stradi
vari was tall and thin. He usually wore a white
woollen cap in winter, and a cotton one in sum
mer ; over his clothes, while at work, he wore a
white leather apron : and as he was always at
work his costume varied but little. He had
acquired more than a competence by labour and
frugality ; and it was a proverb in Cremona,
' Ricco come Stradivari' (Rich as Stradivari).
The superior position in life taken by his de
scendants bears this out. La Houssaie, the
celebrated French violinist (born 1735), whom
Fetis knew in youth, and who visited Cremona
a few years after the death of Stradivari, told
Ftitis that the price at which Stradivari sold his
violins was four louis d'or each — a sum which
would probably have purchased as much in
Cremona a hundred and sixty years ago as ten
times that amount now.1 Cervetto, an Italian
musician in London in the last century, is said to
have received a consignment of Stradivari violins
for sale, but to have returned them, not being
able to dispose of them for the price asked, which
was £4 a-piece. The story is probable enough,
for though the ' Cremona ' violin was popular in
London in the last century, we find in English
literature of that period no trace of the name of
Stradivari.
Though fiddle-making is an art which runs in
families, it is certain that the best makers are
the most original, and that the most original
makers are those who did not inherit their
trade ; Stradivari, Stainer, Forster, Pressenda,
and Benjamin Banks, are prominent instances.
Only one of the two fiddle-making sons of Stra
divari, Francesco and Omobono, inherited any of
the father's ability, and this was Francesco. He
made excellent violins, which are easily distin
guishable from the work of the father. 'The
outline,' says Mr. Hart ('The Violin,' p. 136),
'is rugged, the modelling distinct, the scroll a
ponderous piece of carving, quite foreign to
Stradivarius the elder, and the varnish, though
good, is totally different from the superb coats
found on the father's works of late date. . . .
The design is bold and original, the soundhole
is quite unlike that of Antonius; the tone of
Franciscus's instruments is invariably very rich
and telling.' Francesco and Omobono were both
i F6tis, A. Stradivari, p. 70.
elderly men when their father died, and sur
vived him but a few years. Omobono, the
younger, died in 1742 ; Francesco in 1743- In
1746, Paolo, the youngest son and heir of
Stradivari, let the house in the Piazza San
Domenico to Carlo Bergonzi and his son Mi
chael. Carlo died in 1747: Michael continued
to occupy the house until 1758.
The relics of Stradivari's workshop, his moulds,
patterns, tools, and memoranda, were carefully
preserved by his family for nearly thirty years.
In 1776 they were sold by Paolo Stradivari and
his son Antonio to Count Alessandro Cozio di
Casale Monferrato, an enthusiastic collector of
violins, and once the owner of a celebrated
matchless Amati. These relics, together with the
original correspondence and memorandums of
assignment, are now in the possession of a Pied-
montese nobleman, the Marquis Rolando Delia
Valle. In 1777 Paolo and Antonio Stradivari
disposed of the house in the Piazza San Domenico
to the brothers Ancina. In 1801 it was sold to
one Rocco Bono, a wine-cooper ; in 1853 it passed
into the hands of Giuseppe Vigani; in 1862 it
was sold to Gaetano D'Orleans, a woollen-draper.
From 1786 to 1862 it bore the anagraph 1239;
from 1862 to 1870 it was known as No. 2 Piazza
San Domenico; and since 1870 as No. I Piazza
Roma. When the writer inspected it in 1881 it
was unoccupied.
The descendants of Paolo Stradivari continued
to live and flourish at Cremona. His grandson
Cesare Stradivari was a celebrated obstetric phy
sician, who is still remembered by the Crenion-
ese. When the writer commenced his enquiries
at Cremona concerning Stradivari, he was in
formed that Stradivari was an eminent physi
cian : Stradivari the violin-maker was com
pletely forgotten. Two representatives of the
family still reside in the city : to one of these,
Sig. Dottore Enrico Stradivari, the writer was
indebted for much courtesy, and for a copy of
the privately-printed pamphlet, by the priest
Paolo Lombardini, from which the genealogical
information contained in the present article is
derived. Another branch of the family is settled
in Milan. It may be observed in passing, that
most of the names of the famous violin-makers
of Cremona, except the Amatis, are still to be
found among its citizens. The Guarnieris, Rug-
gieris, and Bergonzis abound ; but the Amatis have
utterly died out, their sole memorial being the
tombstone of one ' Mastinus de Amatis,' in the
floor of the transept of the Duomo. These re
presentatives of the old makers, like the Stradi-
varis, have taken to other occupations : the sole
representative of the old craft is Ceruti, who still
makes violins in the Via Longacqua, and another
violin-maker, even less known to fame, to whom
the writer was directed, but whom he found
engaged in finishing a barrel-organ. The Cre-
monese are barely aware that their town was
once famous for its violins, and it was with some
difficulty that a local amateur recently induced
the municipality to confer the names of Crtmona's
two most famous makers on two streets leading
STRADIVARI.
STRADIVARI.
733
westward out of the Piazza Roma. One of these
streets now bears the name of the ' Via Guarnieri,'
the other that of ' Corso Stradivari.'
Fe"tis has well observed that the violins of
Stradivari are equally remarkable for their extra
ordinary excellence and their extraordinary num
ber. Their solid and durable construction, their
admirable varnish, the considerable price paid for
them in the first instance, and the consequent
care exercised in keeping them, have all con
tributed to their preservation : and it is probable
that most of them are still in existence. Their
number is legion : they are always in the market,
and always command good prices. Since the
middle of the last century, they have been the
favourite instruments of violinists. Up to that
time, Stainer had been the favourite maker.
Veracini used a pair of Stainer violins : that of
Tartini, which was shown in the Milan Exhibi
tion of 1 88 1, was a large yellow Stainer, of rare
excellence. Stradivari's instruments soon ousted
the Stainers from their position, and revived
throughout the musical world the traditional
reputation of Cremona. Pugnani, Salomon,
Lafunt, Viotti, Baillot, Habeneck, Rode, Spohr,
Ernst, used them. Nor, in spite of the rivalry
of Joseph Guarnerius, has there been any sign of
their going out of fashion. In our own time,
Joachim, uses a pair of fine Stradivaris, both
of the best period, one red, the other yellow :
Sarasate, Wilhelmi, Madame Norman-Neruda,
Straus, Marsick, Ludwig, Kummer, Wiener, and
most of our leading violinists, play on this maker's
instruments. It is evident from this continued
popularity that players find them the most effec
tive, for it is impossible to suppose that they
would expend the considerable sums which have
to be paid for them, if they could produce an
equal effect with cheaper instruments.
On this point the opinion of the most eminent
among living players will be read with interest.
Dr. Joachim, after perusing the proofs of this
article, has most kindly communicated to the
writer, to be incorporated with it, a few words
on the tone of Stradivari's violins. He considers
them as mines of musical sound, which the player
must dig into, as it were, in order to develope
their treasures, and attributes to them a peculiar
responsiveness, enabling the earnest player to
place himself completely en rapport with his
instrument — a relation which, as Dr. Joachim's
audiences are well aware, is with him no matter
of fancy, but of fact. After some preliminary
observations, he continues : ' While the violins
of Maggini are remarkable for volume of tone,
and those of Amati for liquidity, none of the
celebrated makers exhibit the union of sweetness
and power in so preeminent a degree as Giuseppe
Guarnieri (del Gesu) and Antonio Stradivari.
If I am to give expression to my individual
feeling, I must pronounce for the latter as my
chosen favourite. It is true that in brilliancy
and clearness, and even in liquidity, Guarnieri
in his best instruments is not surpassed by him :
but what appears to me peculiar to the tone of
Stradivari is a more unlimited capacity for ex
pressing the most varied accents of feeling.1 Jt
seems to well forth like a spring, and to be
capable of infinite modification under the bow.
Stradivari's violins, affording a strong resistance
to the bow, when resistance is desired, and yet
responding to its lightest breath, emphatically
require that the player's ear shall patiently listen
until it catches the secret of drawing out their
tone. Their beauty of tone is not so easily
reached as in the case of many other makers.
Their vibrations increase in warmth, the more
the player, discovering their richness and variety,
seeks from the instrument a sympathetic echo of
his own emotions : so much so that they seem to
be living beings, and become as it were the
player's personal familiars — as if Stradivari had
breathed a soul into them, in a manner achieved
by no other master. It is this which stamps
them as creations of an artistic mind, as positive
works of art.'
It has been suggested to the writer to give
a complete list of the Stradivari instruments :
but the task would be impossible, involving, as
it would, a personal examination of instruments
scattered all over the civilized world. Suph a
list could never be made complete, and would
quickly lose its value.'2 It is commonly supposed
that all the genuine Stradivari violins are known
to the dealers. This is a mistake. The ma
jority of the instruments which come into the
dealer's hands have never been seen before. The
English dealers know the whereabouts of perhaps
a couple of hundred instruments in this country,
and they generally hold a considerable number
in their own hands for sale. There are large
numbers of Stradivaris in Italy, where some
very fine specimens are kept as heirlooms, and in
France, Russia, Germany, Spain, and America.
The price of a Stradivari violin fit for the
player's use ordinarily varies from £100 to
£500, according to quality, style, and condition:
only extraordinary specimens fetch higher prices.
The violas are worth about the same, the
violoncellos somewhat more. A Stradivari of
the earlier period (in the sixteens) may gene
rally be bought at a reasonable price : the finer
instruments of the late period (1700-1728),
if in good condition, will generally fetch from
£300 to £500. Cheap Stradivaris, especially
if undoubtedly genuine, should be viewed with
suspicion. A Stradivari is frequently cheapened
in the market by reason of its having lost its
head. Some ignorant repairer, in fitting it with
a new handle, has discarded the old head along
1 'Gefiihls-accente.' Dr. Joachim uses the term in the technical
sense, signifying that peculiar touch and pressure of the bow and
finger which the character of the music requires. Baillot enumerates
no less than thirty different 'accents,' which he divides into four
classes : 1, The simple and naiire ; 2, The vague and indecisive ;
3, the passionate and dramatic ; 4. the calm and religious. It is an
interesting confirmation of Dr. Joachim's opinion that Paganini's
Joseph Guarnerius violin is fitted with a very light bridge, having no
'heart' or central hole, and extremely small and slender feet. This
great player evidently found it impossihle to ohtain the requisite
delicacy of tone in this instrument with an ordinary bridge, and
therefore had to sacrifice power to expression.
2 E. g. the magnificent collection of a well-known amateur resident
at Blackheath, recently dispersed, included nine Stradivari violins,
all of the very highest class, as well as a. fine Stradivari alto and small
violoncello, besides four splendid violins of Joseph Guarnerius, and
many other treasures of equal value.
734
STKADIVARI.
STRAKOSCH.
with the old handle : or some acuter person, in
order to enhance the value of a better instrument
which has suffered this loss, has deprived the
cheap Stradivari of its head to grace an instru
ment to which it communicates a greater value.
The loss of the head does not affect the tone of the
fiddle, but it detracts greatly from its appearance
and commercial value. But this loss of the head
is not the only cause of cheapness in Stradivaris.
It will often be found that they are too thin in
the wood, or have been so damaged in the belly
or back that the most skilful repairer cannot
revive their tone, though he may restore their
solidity and appearance. It should be remem
bered that although lateral fractures (in the
direction of the grain) do not greatly diminish
the tone and value of the instrument, transverse
fractures (across the grain) in the belly damage
it incurably. Respectable dealers are always
cognisant of the condition of the instruments
which they sell, and the best advice that can be
given to an intending purchaser is (i) to purchase
of no one but a dealer of high reputation, and (2)
not to purchase a cheap instrument.1 [E. J.P.]
STRAKOSCH, MAURICE and MAX, brothers
well known in the United States for a quarter
of a century as entrepreneurs of operatic and
concert ventures. Operatic enterprises in America
have generally been undertaken by managers
who have carried their troupes through the
country, making sojourns in the leading cities of
from one to four weeks, occasionally longer, ac
cordingly as the patronage warranted.
Maurice Strakosch, the elder of the twain,
organised, in 1855, a concert-troupe, including
Mine. Teresa Paradi, SignorsTiberini and Morani,
vocalists, and M. Paul Jullien, violinist, with
himself as musical director. The vocalists of
the troupe afterwards appeared in opera at the
Academy of Music, New York. Subsequent
enterprises in which Maurice was interested were
as follows : —
1856, concert-troupe — Sigismund Thalberg,
Mmes. Paradi, Amalia Strakosch (wife of Mau
rice, nee Patti), Edward Mollenhauer, violinist.
Bernhard Ullmann, Thalberg's business manager,
was a partner in this enterprise, as well as in
that of
1857, Italian opera — Mmes. de la Grange,
d'Orme, Strakosch, d'Angri, Vestoali, Frezzolini,
Sigs. Labocetta, Macaferri, Gassier, Carl Formes.
Maurice then took Frezzolini to Havana and
New Orleans, on an operatic tournee.
1858, Italian opera— Mmes. Paradi, di Wil-
horst, Strakosch; Sigs. Brignoli, Squires, Amadio,
Barili being the other members of the company,
and Jacob Grau a business partner.
1859, Italian opera — Mmes. Colsan, Gazzingga,
Albertini, Strakosch, Adelina Patti (her first
appearance), Natali, Sigs. Brignoli, Bouvarde,
Stigelli, Amadio, Ferri, Barili, Junca, Susini.
UJlmann was again a partner. Patti's extra
ordinary success saved the season, and she was
1 The writer desires to acknowledge the assistance he has derived
in preparing the above article, from the members of the firm of W. E.
Hill & Sons, and from Mr. George Hart, both of Wardour Street.
taken to Havana in the following year, and sub
sequently to Europe, by Maurice.
On Maurice's departure for Europe, Max, who
had, during the previous seasons, acted as busi
ness agent for his brother, became manager. His
enterprises and principal artists have been as
hereafter set forth, Italian opera being under
stood in each instance, except as otherwise in
dicated — namely,
1 86 1 — Mmes.Hinkley, d'Angri, Sigs. Brignoli,
Susini, Mancusi. Jacob Grau was a partner in
this venture.
1862-1863, concerts — Gottschalk, pianist; Car-
lotta Patti, Mile. Cordier, Sig. Brignoli, vocalists ;
Carlo Patti, violinist. Carlo tta and Carlo were
sister and brother, respectively, of Adelina.
In 1864 Max went to Europe with Sig. Brig
noli (for whom, with Maurice's assistance, an
engagement was procured at Les Italiens, Paris),
and returned with Wehli, pianist, and Mile, de
Kattow, violoncellist.
1865 — Mmes. Ghioni, Cannissa, Strakosch;
Sigs. Errani, Macaferri, Mancusi, Morra, Susini,
Graff. Sig. Franceso Rosa, director.
1866 — Mme. Parepa, Sig. Brignoli.
1867 — Mme. de la Grange, Sig. Brignoli.
1868, Italian opera and concerts, in conjunc
tion with Max Maretzek; Miss Clara Louise
Kellogg, whom Strakosch had brought back from
Europe, being in the troupe.
1869, concerts — Carlotta Patti being the lead
ing attraction, and during the season making a
brilliant triumph as the Queen of Night in ' The
Magic Flute.' '
1870, concerts — Mile. Christine Nilsson (first
appearance in the United States), Miss Annie
Louise Gary, Sigs. Brignoli, Verger, M. Vieux-
temps, the distinguished violinist.
1871 — Miles. Nilsson, Duval, Miss Gary, Sigs.
Brignoli, Barre, Capaul, Jamet ; Max Maretzek,
director. Thomas's ' Mignon ' was produced with
Nilsson in the title-role.
1872, concerts — Carlotta Patti, Sig. Mario.
1873 — Mile. Nilsson, Torriani, Maresi; Miss
Gary ; Sigs. Campanini, Capaul, Mansel, del
Puente, Nannetti, Scolara. Sig. Muzio, conductor.
The troupe was subsequently strengthened by
the addition of Miles. Pauline Lucca and di
Murska. Verdi's 'Aida' was a leading feature
in the season's business.
1874 — Miles. Albani, Heilbron, Donadio, Ma
resi, Potentini ; Miss Gary; Sigs. Carpi, Ben-
fratelli, de Bassini, del Puente, Tagliapietra,
Fiorini. Sig. Muzio, conductor. Wagner's ' Lo
hengrin,' Marchetti's ' Ruy Bias,' and Verdi's
'Requiem Mass' were brought out. The com
pany was strong and the repertory was carefully
selected, but the venture entailed heavy losses
on the management.
1 875, opera and concert — Mme. Tietjens, Mme.
Arabella Goddard, Miles. Beaumont, Carreno
(whose reputation as a pianist was already great,
and who now made her ddbut as a vocalist) ; Sigs.
Brignoli, Reina, Orlandini, Tagliapietra, Gott-
chalk (brother of the pianist), Mr. Tom Karl.
Max Maretzek, Gotthold Carlberg, conductors.
STRAKOSCH.
1876 — Mme. Palmieri, Miles. Belocca, Mar
tinez; Sig's. Brignoli, Palmieri; Mr. Karl.
1877, Italian and English opera — Mme. Marie
R6ze ; Misses Kellogg, Gary ; Messrs. Graff, Verdi,
Gottschalk, Karl, Couly. S. Behrens, conductor.
1878— Misses Kellogg, Cary; Miles. Litta,
Marco; Messrs. Charles R. Adams, Couly; Sigs.
Rosnati, Lazzarini, Pautaleoni, Gottschalk.
Behrens and Sig. de Novellis, conductors.
1879 — Miles. Singee, Lablanche (real name,
Davenport, daughter of Mr. E. L. Davenport, a
celebrated American actor), Litty, Belocca ; Sigs.
Petrovitch, Baldanza, Lazzarini, Storti, Gott
schalk, Castlemary, Papini. Behrens and de
Novellis, conductors.
1880, English opera — Mme. Marie Roze; Miles.
Torriani ; Misses Anandale, Schiriner ; Messrs.
Byron, Perugini, Carleton, Couly. Behrens and
de Novellis, conductors. [F.H.J.]
STRANIERA, LA (The Stranger). Italian
opera in 2 acts ; libretto by Romani, music by
Bellini. Produced at the Scala, Milan, Feb. 14,
1829. In London, at the King's Theatre, June 23,
1832 (Tamburini's de'but). [G.]
STRATHSPEY, a Scotish dance, closely allied
to the Reel, derives its name from the strath or
valley of the Spey, in the North of Scotland,
where it appears to have first been danced. The
word does not appear in connection with music
till late in the iSth century, but much earlier
than that tunes are found suited for the style.
Though slower in time than the Reel, the Strath
spey calls for more exertion. The former is a
gliding dance, while the Strathspey abounds in
those jerky motions which call every muscle
into play. Thus the music of the Reel is com
posed of a series of passages of equal quavers,
while the Strathspey consists of dotted notes and
semiquavers. The latter frequently precede the
long note, and this peculiarity has received the
name of the Scotish snap. That the two words
were, a century ago, almost synonymous, is shown
by a volume which is still of the highest au
thority, and of which the title-page runs thus —
'A Collection of Strathspeys or Old Highland
Reells, with a Bass for the Violincello, Harp
sichord, or Pianoforte. By Angus Gumming,
at Granton. Strathspey. 1780.' The word
Strathspey is here printed in very large letters,
while ' Old Highland Reells ' are in the smallest.
Moreover, throughout the volume, the word
Strathspey is not once used, but always Reell
So-and-so. No. 5, for example, though clearly
a Strathspey, is entitled 'Acharnae Reell.' Reels,
and the dance music of Scotland generally, have
been already noticed in these pages [REELS,
pp. 91, 92] ; and in the article SCOTISH Music
(pp. 450, 451) Strathspeys are touched upon.
Something, however, may be said in regard to
Strathspeys specially. One point of difference
between them and the Reel is in the tempi of the
two ; in the Reel ^=126 Maelzel, in the Strath
spey <^ = 94- Another is the smoothness of the
notes in the Reel as compared with the broken
notes of the Strathspey.
STRATHSPEY.
Reel. ' Clydeside Lassies.'
735
• ' - — ^ — —.,—., ~mj—f — '~ aj~* '~~^ - -— » — I _ — ^ .1 . W ._ —
etc.
It will be seen that in the above all is written
in smooth notes, while the Strathspey consists
almost entirely of broken ones.
Strathspey. ' Tullocligorum.'
etc.
The remainder of the above Reel and Strath
spey will be found in the article on SCOTISH
Music, p. 451 . Let us however add a Strathspey
in its complete form, which is certainly one of
the finest ever written, and to this day retains
its great popularity.
Strathspey. ' Marquis of Huntley."
— ^m**— Sfe^ **- -,
&tE^EEE|jE!l
With the Reels and Strathspeys of Scotland
the name of Gow is indissolubly associated. Neil
Gow, the founder of the family, and a man of
real genius, was born at Inver, near Dunkeld,
March 22, 1727, and died in 1807. He was a
man of strong original genius — one of Nature's
own musicians. Our obligation to him is two
fold. We are indebted to him for many of our
finest Reels and Strathspeys, and also for the
pains which he took to collect and hand down
736
STRATHSPEY.
STRATHSPEY.
to us in a printed form some of the best of our
old national music. In performing his special
task, the eager musician was nowise scrupulous
as to how or where he found the melodies for
transformation into Reels or Strathspeys. It
has been alleged that he converted many of our
vocal melodies into dance tunes. But the worst
that can be charged against him is that he
altered the old names of many tunes, calling
them after his patrons and patronesses, thus
often rendering it doubtful whether a tune was
his own composition or belonged to an earlier
time.
That Neil Gow was the greatest player on the
fiddle of Scotish dance-music, whether in his
own time or since, is universally admitted. In
a short notice of him (published in the ' Scots'
Magazine,' 1809), Dr. M'Knight, who had fre
quently heard Neil play, and who was himself a
famous fiddler, thus describes his style of execu
tion : — ' His bow-hand as a suitable instrument
of his genius was uncommonly powerful ; and
when the note produced by the itp-bow was
often feeble and indistinct in other hands, it
was struck in his playing with a strength and
certainty which never failed to surprise and
delight skilful hearers. . . . We may add the
effect of the sudden shout with which he fre
quently accompanied his playing in the quick
tunes, and which seemed instantly to electrify
the dancers, inspiring them with new life and
energy, and rousing the spirits of the most in
animate.'
Burns took many old Strathspeys, and wrote
to them some of his finest verses. Thus in
' Rothermurche's Rant,' the first part of the
tune is almost note for note that of the Strath
spey ; the second part has been altered so as to
make the music more vocal in its character, the
original being strictly instrumental music, with
difficulties which the voice could not well over-
come.
Rothiemurchus' Reel. ' Tigh'n dun.'
Lassie wl* the lint-white locks, Bonnie lassie! artless lassie !
Wilt thou wi' rae tent the flocks, Wilt thou be my dearie 0 ?
Another fine specimen is 'Green grow the
Rashes O,' verses by Burns. An early version
of this tune is in a MS. Lute Book which be
longed to Sir Robert Gordon of Straloch, dated
1627-29. It was styled 'a daunce ' then, as it
was later, but has none of the dotted notes so
characteristic of the Strathspey. In the ' Col
lection of Original Scotch Tunes,' published by
H. Playford, 1700, there are a few Reel tunes
in addition to the large number of Scotch
measures which it contains. One called ' Cron-
stoune ' is a very good specimen of the Reel,
whether quick or slow. Another, entitled ' The
Birks of Plunketty,' is a good Strathspey, but
has been written down in 3-4 time by some one
who did not understand the measure. Another,
'The Cummers (Commeres) of Largo,' is styled
a Reel ; being in 9-8 time we would now term
it a Jig. But to return to Burns' song, ' Green
grow the Rashes 0,' the words of which he
wrote to what Angus Gumming calls 'The Grant's
Rant ' or ' Feve feve Tunal chie.'
— 1 — •! — 1 — •
'Roy's Wife of Aldivalloch' was written to
the tune of ' The Dutchess of Hamilton's Reell,'
words by Mrs. Grant of Carron. Burns also
wrote verses to the same air, beginning, 'Canst
thou leave me thus in sorrow?' but the lady's
verses have held their own even against his,
o
and are sung to this day.
Burns' 'Wilt thou be my dearie ?' was written
to the tune of 'The Souter's Daughter,' named
by Angus Gumming, in the volume above re
ferred to, 'Dutchess of Buccleugh's Reell.' Burns,
in his instructions as to the setting of the music,
says in a note annexed to the words — 'Tune,
The Souter's Daughter. N,B.— It is only the
first part of the tune to which the song is to be
set.'
' The Braes abune Bonaw ' is set to ' Lord
Lovat's Reell.' The first ' Banks o' Doon ' (not
the popular version) Burns says he wrote to the
tune of ' Ballendalloch's Reell.' 'Dr. William
Grant's Reell ' was laid under contribution for
the words written in 1795, ' This is no my ain
house.' 'Whistle o'er the lave o't' is a good
Strathspey, and to it Burns wrote the verses
beginning, 'First when Maggie was my care,' as
a substitute for old verses, witty but indecent.
Carron's Reel, 'The Whisky Still,' has given
the melody to a good song, ' Ewie wi' the cruikit
horn.' The tune of 'Dinna think, bonnie lassie,'
is borrowed from ' Clunie's Reell.'
Many other specimens could be given, but the
above may suffice for our present purpose.
In conclusion, we may briefly refer to the
extremely bald accompaniments which were
written a hundred years ago to these dances,
when arranged with a bass for the violoncello,
harpsichord, or pianoforte. A few bars from
'Sir James Colquhoun's Reell,' 'The Black
Watch, 42nd Regiment,' will enable the reader
to understand what is meant. It will be noticed
that there is never more than one note in the
bass, this however was usually played in octaves.
STRATHSPEY.
STKAUSS.
737
±zr±
Jz-
^^
etc.
[T.L.S.]
STRAUS, LUDWIG, an excellent violin.player,
was born at Pressburg, March 28, 1835 ; entered
the Vienna Conservatoire in 1843, and remained
there till the revolution in 1848; was pupil of
Bohm for the violin, and Preyer and Nottebohm
for counterpoint ; made his first appearance (at
the same time with Franlein Csillag) in a con
cert at the hall of the Musikverein, Vienna, in
June 1850. During the next few years he made
various public appearances, besides playing in
the private concerts of several patrons of music,
especially Prince Czartoryski, at whose reunions
he played second fiddle to Mayseder for three
years. At the Mozart Centenary Festival in 1856
he met Liszt, and like many other young artists
benefittecl by his kindness. Straus's first concert
tourne'e was made in 1855, and extended as far
as Venice and Florence. In 1857 he made the
acquaintance of Piatti, with whom he took a
second tour through Germany and Sweden. In
1860 he was appointed concertmeister of the
theatre and of the Museum-concerts in Frankfort,
a post which he held for five years, giving also
quartet concerts, and leading the subscription
concerts in the neighbouring towns. In 1860 he
first visited England, played at the Musical Union
June 5, etc., and at the Monday Popular Concert
of June 18. In 1861 he returned, and appeared
twice at the Philharmonic, April 29 and June 24.
In 1864 he took up his residence in this country,
settling after a time in Manchester, where he is
leader of Mr. Charles Halle's orchestra. But he
often visits London, to take either first fiddle or
viola in the Monday Popular Concerts, or to play
solo at the Crystal Palace or the Philharmonic,
and during his residence in England he has also
played at Dresden, Vienna, etc. Straus is a
member of the Queen's private band, and ' Solo
Violinist' to Her Majesty. [G.]
STRAUSS, JOHANN, composer of dance-music
of world- wide celebrity, born in Vienna, March
14, 1804. As a child he showed talent for
music, and a love for the violin, but his parents,
small innkeepers, apprenticed him to a book
binder, from whom he ran away. A friend met
him, took him back, and persuaded the parents
to entrust him with the boy's education as a
musician. With the son of this benefactor the
little Strauss learnt the violin from Polyschansky,
afterwards studying harmony and instrumenta
tion with Seyfried. He soon played the viola
in string-quartets at private houses, and at
VOL. III. PT. 6.
fifteen entered Pamer's orchestra at the 'Sperl,'
a favourite place of amusement in the Leopold-
stadt. At that time the excellent playing of
Lanner and the brothers Drahanek was exciting
attention ; Strauss offered himself, and was
accepted as fourth in the little band. Soon,
however, their numbers had to be increased to
meet their numerous engagements, and Strauss
acted as deputy-conductor till 1825, when he
and Lanner parted. In the Carnival of 1826
Strauss and his little orchestra of fourteen per
formers appeared in the hall of the ' Swan ' in
the Rossau suburb, and took the hearts of the
people by storm. His op. I, the ' Tauberl-
Walzer' (Haslinger), was speedily followed
by others, the most successful being the ' Ketten-
briicken-Walzer,' called after the Hall of that
name. Strauss was next invited to return with
his now enlarged orchestra to the Sperl, and
with such success as to induce the proprietor,
Scherzer, to engage him for six years, which
virtually founded the reputation of the ' Sperl,'
and its orchestral conductor. Meantime Strauss
was appointed Capellmeister of the I st Burger-
regiment, and entrusted with the music at the
court fetes and balls. As his band was daily in
request at several places at once, he increased
the number to over 200, from which he formed
a select body for playing at concerts, in music
of the highest class. He now began to make
tours in the provinces and abroad, visiting
Pesth in 1833 ; Berlin, Leipzig, and Dresden in
1834; West Germany in 1835; and North
Germany, Holland, Belgium, and the Rhine,
in 1836. His next tour began in October 1837,
and embraced Strassburg, Paris, Rouen, Havre,
Belgium, London, and the larger towns of Great
Britain ; he then returned to Belgium, and
back to England and Scotland, and finally
returned over the Continent by Strassburg,
reaching Vienna in December 1838 in very bad
health. His success in Paris was unprecedented,
notwithstanding the formidable rivalry of Musard
and Dufresne, with the former of whom he
wisely joined for a series of thirty concerts.
A disagreeable intrigue nearly made him throw
up the journey to England, but it was only
there that his profits at all remunerated him for
his enormous expenses. In London he played
at seventy-two concerts, and at innumerable
balls and fetes given in honour of the Queen's
coronation (June 28, 1838). On his second
visit he had great difficulty in keeping his band
from dispersing, so weary were they of con
tinual travelling. He managed, however, to go
again to Birmingham, Liverpool, and Dublin,
besides visiting Reading, Cheltenham, Worcester,
Leicester, Derby, Nottingham, and Sheffield.
At Sheffield his receipts were small, and at
Halifax still less, but when the amateurs of
both places discovered the kind of musician they
had been neglecting, a deputation was sent with
post-horses to Leeds to bring him back again.
He was taken ill at Derby, and only reached
Vienna with great difficulty. His first re
appearance at the Sperl was quite a popular
3B
738
STRAUSS.
fete. On May 5, 1840, he conducted for the
first time in the Imperial Volksgarten, which
was crowded whenever his band performed.
Strauss now introduced the quadrille, which he
had studied in Paris, in place of the galop.
His first work of the kind was the 'Wiener
Carneval-Quadrille ' (op. 124). Henceforward,
except waltzes — among which the ' Donau-
lieder' (op. 127) are still played — he composed
only quadrilles, polkas, and marches, including
the favourite 'Radetzky-March.' On April 16,
1843, he and the band of his old Burger-
regiment accompanied the body of his old
colleague Lanner to the grave. An excursion
to Olmiitz, Troppau, etc., in the autumn of 1844,
was succeeded in the next autumn by one to
Dresden, Magdeburg, and Berlin, where he was
immensely feted. The king appeared in person
at Kroll's Garden, and invited Strauss to play
at the palace. The Prince of Prussia, the
present Emperor of Germany, ordered a per
formance at Kroll's by more than 200 bands
men, conducted by the Capellmeister General
Wipprecht, before Strauss and his orchestra,
when the royal princes, the generals, and the
pick of the nobility, attended. On his departure
a grand torchlight procession and serenade were
given in his honour. On his return to Vienna
he was made conductor of the court-balls. In
the autumn of 1846 he went to Silesia, and the
year following again to Berlin and Hamburg,
where he revenged himself for some slights
caused by professional jealousy by giving a
concert for the poor. He returned to Vienna
by Hanover, Magdeburg, and Berlin. During
the stormy days of March 1848 he did homage
to the spirit of the times in the titles of his
pieces, but Strauss was at heart a Viennese of
the olden time, a fact which caused him much
unpleasantness on his next tour, in 1849, by
Munich, Stuttgart, Frankfort, and the Rhine,
Brussels, and England. He stayed in London
and the provinces from April to July. After
a brilliant farewell-concert he was accompanied
down the Thames by a fleet of boats, one of
which contained a band playing the popular air,
' So leb' denn wohl du stilles Haus,' from
Raimund's ' Verschwender intonierte.' In the
midst of this gay scene he was oppressed with
a presentiment that he should never revisit
London. Shortly after his return to Vienna he
was taken ill with scarlet fever, to which he
succumbed on the fourth day, Sept. 25, 1849.
AVith him departed a feature of Viennese life,
and that the people themselves felt this was
shown by the vast concourse at his funeral.
A Requiem was performed in his honour on
October n by his own band, and the Manner-
gesangverein of Vienna, the solos being sung by
Mesdames Hasselt and Ernst, Aloys Ander and
Staudigl, all from the court opera. Strauss
married, in 1824, Anna Streim, daughter of an
innkeeper, who bore him five children, Johann,
Joseph, Eduard, Anna, and Therese. They
separated after eighteen years, on the ground of
incompatibility of temper. There are numerous
STRAUSS.
portraits from which an idea can be gathered of
Strauss's personal appearance. Though small
he was well made and distinguished-looking,
with a singularly formed head. His dress was
always neat and well chosen. Though lively
in company he was naturally rather silent.
From the moment he took his violin in his hand
he became another man, his whole being seem
ing to expand with the sounds he drew from it.
As an artist he furnished many pleasant hours
to thousands, and high and low combined to do
him honour, while great masters like Men
delssohn, Meyerbeer, and Cherubini, acknow
ledged his talent. He raised dance-music to a
higher level than it had ever reached before,
and invested his copious melodies with all the
charm of brilliant instrumentation. Full of fire,
life, and boisterous merriment, they contrasted
well with Lanner' s softer and more sentimental
airs, and must be judged by a totally different
standard from that of mere dance-music. As
a conductor it was his constant endeavour to
mingle classical names in his programmes, and
thus to exercise an elevating influence on the
masses. His works, published almost entirely
by Haslinger, number 251, and comprise 152
waltzes, 24 galops, 6 cotillons and contredanses,
32 quadrilles, 13 polkas, and 18 marches, in
cluding some without opus-numbers. The bulk
of these have made, so to speak, the tour of
the world ; each new waltz was in its way an
event, not only in Vienna, but wherever the
first printed copies penetrated. Innumerable
pens, including those of poets, celebrated his
works, and the stage itself took part in the
general homage, ' Strauss and Lanner ' being
the title of a one-act comedy by Topfer, and a
three-act piece by Anton Langer.
Of his three sons, the eldest, JOHANN, scarcely
less gifted than his father, was born in Vienna,
October 25,1825. In accordance with the father's
wish that none of his sons should adopt his own
line of life, Johann, after finishing his education
at the Gymnasium and Polytechnic Institute,
became a clerk in the savings' bank, although he
had, with his mother's help, long taken lessons
in secret on the violin, and even studied com
position with Drechsler. When only six he
composed, at Salmannsdorf near Vienna, where
the family used to spend the summer, his first
waltz, which was performed on his fiftieth birth
day as 'Erster Gedanke.' The constraint put
upon him became at length unbearable, and on
October 15, 1844, he first appeared as a con
ductor at Dommayer's, at Hietzing, playing com
positions of his own, and his father's 'Loreley
Walzer.' His success on that occasion decided
his future career. After his father's death he
incorporated the two bands, and made a tour
to the country towns of Austria, Warsaw, and
the more important towns of Germany. He also
undertook for ten years the direction of the
summer concerts in the Petropaulowski Park
at St. Petersburg. In 1862 he married the
popular singer Henriette ('Jetty') Treffz, and
in 1863 became conductor of the court balls.
STRAUSS.
This post he resigned after his brilliant success
on the stage, but he had in the meantime com
posed nearly 400 waltzes, of as high a type as
those of his father. His music is penetrated
with Viennese gaiety and spirit, and has made
its way into all countries. The waltz, ' An der
schonen blauen Donau' (op. 314), became a
kind of musical watchword in Vienna, and was
played on all festive occasions. Besides Russia,
Strauss visited Paris (during the Exhibition of
1867), London, New York, Boston, and the
larger towns of Italy. The theatre An der
AVien was the scene of his triumphs as a com
poser of operettas, which rapidly spread to all
the theatres, large and small. ' Indigo und die
vierzig Rauber' (his first, 1871), 'Der Karneval
in Rom,' ' Die Fledermaus,' ' Prinz Methusalem,'
'Cagliostro,' 'Das Spitzentuch der Konigin,'
and 'Die lustige Krieg,' all published by Spina,
were soon known all over the world, and were
sung everywhere. After the death of his wife
on April 8, 1878, he married another dramatic
singer, Angelica Dittrich. His pen is still busy
(1883), and we may hope for more of its lively
productions.
His next brother, JOSEPH, born August 22,
1827, in Vienna, was also obliged to accom
modate himself to his father's wishes, and be
came an architect. He had. however, studied
music in secret, and during an illness of his
brother's in 1853 he conducted for him with a
baton, as he did not learn the violin till later.
He next collected a band, began to compose,
and published in rapid succession 283 works
(Haslinger and Spina) not less popular than
those of his brother — indeed ranked by some
even higher. He had always been delicate, and
the excitement incidental to his calling increased
the mischief year by year. A visit to Warsaw
in 1870, against the wish of his friends, was
very disastrous. Some Russian officers, having
sent for him in the middle of the night to play
for them, so shamefully ill-treated him for his
refusal that he had to take to his bed. Under
the devoted nursing of his wife (married in
1857) he rallied sufficiently to return to Vienna,
but sank a few days afterwards, July 22,
1870.
The youngest of his brothers, EDUARD,
was born at Vienna, Feb. 14, 1835, and edu
cated at the Schotten and Akademien Gym
nasiums. His father having died before he
grew up he devoted himself entirely to music,
learnt the harp, and studied composition with
Preyer. In 1862 he made his first appearance
as a conductor in the Dianasaal, and was well
received for his father's sake. In 1865 he took
his brother Johann's place at the concerts in
St. Petersburg, and in 1870 became conductor
of the court balls. He and his band have made
repeated tours to Dresden, Leipzig, Breslau,
Berlin, Hamburg, Frankfort, etc. He still ap
pears regularly in Vienna on fixed days at the
Volksgarten, and in the winter in the large hall
of the Mus:kverein, when his programmes are
always attractive. Up to this time he has com
STEETTO.
739
posed over 200 pieces of dance-music, published
by Haslinger, and latterly, with few exceptions,
by Spina ^Schreiber). Eduard Strauss married
in 1863. [C.F.P.]
STREICHER, JOHANN ANDREAS, a professor
of music in Arienna, and by marriage with Nanette
Stein, the founder of the pianoforte-making firm
in that city, derived from Stein of Augsburg,
that was to become in course of time the famous
house of Streicher und Sohn. J. A. Streicher
was born at Stuttgart in 1761 : he was a man of
education and great intelligence, and was more
over distinguished by his friendship with Schiller.
He brought up his son, JOHANN BAPTIST, who
was born in 1 794, to the business, and long before
his death, which took place in 1832, resigned it
to the son's complete control. Johann Baptist
maintained the excellent traditions of his worthy
predecessors; and when he died in 1871, left his
son, Herr Emil Streicher, the proprietor of this
historical business, the services of which in the
improvement of pianoforte construction are duly
recognised in the articles PIANOFORTE and STEIN.
The distinguished pianist, Mr. Ernst Pauer, is a
grandson of J. A. Streicher and Nanette Stein,
and a great-grandson of the object of Mozart's
admiration, J. A. Stein of Augsburg. [See
PAUER.] [A.J.H.]
STRETTO (Ifcal.), literally 'close' or 'narrow.'
A term used in two ways. Firstly in Fugue,
where it designates the following of response to
subject at a closer interval of time than at first.
This device is usually employed towards the end
of a fugue, so as to give some impression of
climax. But there are plenty of exceptions to
that custom ; e.g.
tf^m
-^ BACH 48, No. r.
t£7
which occurs close to the beginning. Some sub
jects will bear more than one stretto, in which
case the closer naturally comes last ; e. g.
from the 'Amen' chorus of Handel's 'Messiah.'
(The inner parts are omitted for the sake of
clearness.) Still more remarkable instances
will be found in the fugue of Bach's Toccata in
D minor.
2. The second use of the word occurs more
especially in Italian opera, when towards the end
3B2
740
STRETTO.
STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
of a piece the time is quickened, bringing the
accents closer together. Thus the title might be,
and sometimes is, applied to the last prestissimo
of the Choral Symphony. It is sometimes used,
but quite wrongly, as a direction equivalent to
accelerando, instead of in its proper sense of piu
mosso. [F.C.]
STRICT COUNTERPOINT (Lat. Contra-
punctus proprius, vel severus ; Ital. Contrappunto
severo; ContrappuntoaUaCapella;GerTa..Strenger
Satz, Kapellstyl; Fr. Contrepoint severe). The
art of writing, in Parts, for two or more Voices,
without the employment of unprepared Discords.
The term is not very well chosen. The laws
of Free Part- writing are quite as severe as those
of the so-called Strict Style. But, the conven
tional application of the term ' strict ' to the
method which forbids the direct percussion of a
Fundamental Dissonance, and 'free,' to that which
permits it, has so long been generally accepted,
that it would be impossible, now, to introduce a
more exact form of terminology.
The laws of Strict Counterpoint are not open,
like those of Harmony, to scientific discussion ;
for, Counterpoint is not a Science, but an Art.
It is true that its most important rules, when
tested by the principles of Natural Science, are
found to coincide with them, in all essential
particulars ; and to this circumstance alone are
they indebted for their unassailable position,
and promise of future security. Their mathe
matical accuracy fails, however, to account for
their universal acceptance as a code of artistic
regulations. Their authority for this rests solely
upon the praxis of the Great Masters of the
Polyphonic Schools ; which praxis was, from first
to last, purely empirical. The refined taste, and
true musical instinct, of Josquin des Pro's, Wil-
laert, Byrd, Tallis, Palestrina, and their con
temporaries, rebelled against the hideous com
binations demanded by the rules of Diaphonia,
and Organum,1 and substituted for them the
purest and most harmonious progressions that
Art, aided by a cultivated ear, could produce ;
but, in their search for these, they were guided
by no acoustic theory. They simply wrote what
they felt : and because the instincts of true
genius can never err, that which they felt was
uniformly good and true and logical, and based
unconsciously upon a foundation firm enough to
stand the test of modern mathematical analysis.
The leaders of the Monodic School 2 rejected the
teaching of these Great Masters ; and, in their
insane desire for progress, invented new forms
of cacophony not a whit less rude than those
practised by the Diaphonists of the I3th cen
tury. All Italy followed their baneful example ;
and, for a time, relapsed into chaos. But Ger
man Musicians, unwilling to destroy the old
land-marks, retained, in their full force, the
time-honoured laws relating to the use of Per
fect and Imperfect Concords, Syncopations, and
Notes of Regular and Irregular Transition,
while they extended the system by promulgating
See OKOANDM ; POLYPHONIA.
2 See
new regulations for the government of Funda
mental Discords introduced without the cus
tomary forms of Preparation ; and, because such
Discords had never before been sanctioned, this
new method of Part-writing was called 'free,'
though its rules were really more numerous than
those of the older one.
It was not until some considerable time after
the invention of printing, that the laws of Strict
Counterpoint were given to the world in the form
of a systematic code. Franchinus Gafurius, in
his ' Practica Musica,' published at Milan in
1496, gave a tolerably intelligible epitome of
certain rules, which, at that period, were sup
posed to embody all the information that it was
necessary for the student to acquire. The ' Mu-
sice active Micrologus' of Ornitoparchus, printed
at Leipzig in 1517, set forth the same laws in
clearer language. The ' Dodecachordon ' of Gla-
reanus, and the ' Toscanello in Musica ' of Pietro
Aron, both printed at Venice in 1529, were
illustrated by examples of great value to the
tyro, whose labours were still farther assisted
by the appearance of Zarlino's 'Institution! ar-
moniche' in 1558, and Zacconi's ' Prattica di
Musica' in 1596. In 1597, Thomas Morley
published his ' Plaine and easie introduction to
Practicall Musicke' — the earliest treatise of im
portance in the English language ; and, in 1609,
John Douland printed an English paraphrase
of the 'Micrologus' of Ornitoparchus. These
works set forth, with gradually increasing clear
ness, the regulations which, in the I5th century,
had been transmitted from teacher to pupil by
tradition only. The Compositions of the Great
Polyphonic Masters formed a living commentary
upon the collective rules ; and, with an endless
succession of such works within his reach, the
student of the period ran little risk of being led
astray. But when the line of Polyphonic Com
posers came to an end, the verbal treatises, no
longer illustrated by living examples, lost so
much of their value, that the rules were in
danger of serious misconstruction, and would
probably have been to a great extent forgotten,
had not Fux, in his 'Gradus ad Parnassum,'
published at Vienna in 1725, set them forth
with a systematic clearness, which, exhausting
the subject, left nothing more to be desired.
This invaluable treatise, founded entirely on the
practice of the Great Masters, played so import
ant a part in the education of the three greatest
Composers of the School of Vienna, Haydn,
Mozart, and Beethoven, that it is impossible to
over-estimate its influence upon their method of
Part^writing. So clear are its examples, and so
reasonable its arguments, that it has formed the
basis of all the best treatises of later date, of
which two only — Albrechtsberger's 'Griindliche
Anweisung zur Composition' (Leipzig, 1790)?
and Cherubini's ' Cours de Contrepoint et de la
Fugue' (Paris, 1835), are °f anv rea^ import
ance. These two, however, are especially valu
able; not, indeed, as substitutes for the 'Gradus,'
but as commentaries upon it. For Fux treats
only of Strict Counterpoint, and writes all his
STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
741
examples in the old Ecclesiastical Modes; but
Albrechtsberger deals both with the Strict, and
the Free Styles, while Cherubini accommodates
the laws of the Strict Style to the tonality of
the modern Scale, with such consummate skill,
that they bear all the appearance of having been
originally enacted in connection with it ; thus
solving, for the modern student, a very difficult
problem, which Haydn, Mozart, and Beethoven,
were left to work out for themselves.
In most important particulars, these three great
teachers, follow the same general plan. All write
their examples on Canti fermi, consisting entirely
of Semibreves : all make their Canti fermi close
by descending one Degree upon the Tonic, or
the Final of the Mode: and all agree in dividing
their exercises into five distinct classes, now known
as the Five Orders of Counterpoint, the Rules for
which may be thus epitomised : —
GENERAL LAWS. The early Contrapuntists in
sist strongly upon the observance of the four
following 'Cardinal Rules' (Eegulce cardinales).
I. One Perfect Concord may proceed to an
other, in Contrary, or Oblique Motion ; but not
in Similar Motion.
II. A Perfect Concord may proceed to an
Imperfect Concord in all the three kinds of
Motion.
III. An Imperfect Concord may proceed to a
Perfect Concord in Contrary, or Oblique Motion ;
but not in Similar Motion.
IV. One Imperfect Concord may proceed to
another in all the three kinds of Motion.
The intention of these Rules is, to prevent the
possibility of Consecutive or Hidden Fifths, Oc
taves, and Unisons.
FIRST ORDER (Note against note). One
Semibreve must be written, in each Part, against
each Semibreve in the Canto fermo. All pro
gressions must be purely Diatonic ; the employ
ment of Chromatic Intervals being utterly pro
hibited, both in Harmony and in Melody, in
this and all the succeeding Orders. No Dis
cords of any kind are admissible. In two Parts,
the only permitted Intervals are, the three
Perfect, and the four Imperfect Concords : i. e.
the Unison, Octave, and Perfect Fifth;1 and the
Major and Minor Thirds and Sixths. In three
or more Parts, the only Harmonies permitted are,
the Major and Minor Common Chords, and
the Chord of the Sixth. The Chord of the 6-4
and the Augmented and Diminished Triads are
prohibited ; but the First Inversion of the Di
minished Triad is admissible, because none of
its Intervals are in Dissonance with the Bass.
In three Parts, each Chord should, if possible,
consist of a Root, Third, and Fifth ; or, a Bass-
note, Third, and Sixth. In four Parts, the Octave
should be added. But, in cases of necessity, any
Interval may be doubled, or omitted. The se
parate Parts may proceed, either in Conjunct
1 In Counterpoint, the Perfect Fourth, when used alone, or reckoned
from the Bass-note, is held to be, and treated as, a Discord. When
it occurs among the upper notes of a, Chord, the Bass taking no share
in its formation, it is treated as a Perfect Concord. The same rule
applies to the Augmented Fourth a'ntonus), and the Diminished
Fifth (Quinta falsa).
Movement, by Major or Minor Seconds ; or,
disjunctly, by leaps of a Major or Minor Third,
a Perfect Fourth, a Perfect Fifth, a Minor Sixth,
or an Octave. All other leaps, including that of
the Major Sixth, are absolutely prohibited. The
first Semibreve, in Two-Part Counterpoint, must
be accompanied by a Perfect Concord : in three
or more Parts, one Part at least must form a
Perfect Concord with the Bass. In the remaining
Semibreves, Imperfect Concords are to be pre
ferred, in two Parts.
In this, and all other Orders of Counterpoint,
the Parts may cross each other, to any extent.
Consecutive Fifths, Octaves, and Unisons, in
Similar Motion, are forbidden, in any number of
Parts. In four or more Parts, Consecutive Fifths
are permitted, in Contrary Motion, but only as a
last resource.2 This Licence, however, does not
extend to Consecutive Octaves, which were far
more carefully avoided, by the Great Masters,
than Consecutive Fifths, even in Contrary Mo
tion.
But Consecutive Fifths and Octaves are only
forbidden when they occur between the same
two Parts. When produced by different Parts,
or, by making the Parts cross each other, they
are perfectly lawful.3
Hidden Fifths and Octaves are as strictly for
bidden, in two Parts, as real Consecutives ; but,
in four or more Parts, as at (d), in Ex. 3, the
Great Masters never troubled themselves to avoid
them.*
The False Relation of the Tritonus (Aug
mented Fourth) is strictly forbidden, in two
Parts ; but permitted, in three, or more. That
of the Octave is forbidden, even in eight Parts.
In two Parts, the Unison is forbidden, except
in the first and last notes. The Octave is per
mitted, in Oblique Motion ; and, in Contrary
Motion, also, provided it be approached by
separation — i. e. by the mutual divergence of
the Parts which produce it ; as at (c), in Ex. 2.
Its employment by approximation — i. e. by the
convergence of the Parts, as at (6) in Ex. 2 — is
only permitted in the final Cadence.5
In Two-Part Counterpoint of this Order, it is
forbidden to take more than three Thirds, or
Sixths, in succession, unless the Parts be made
to cross each other.
The final Cadence is formed, either by a Major
Sixth followed by an Octave, as at (c), in Ex. 2 ;
or, by a Minor Third, followed by an Octave, or
an Unison, as at (a) in Ex. I. In two Parts,
these Intervals will complete the necessary for
mula. In more than two Parts, the same inter
vals must be given to the Canto fermo, and one
2 It will be seen, that, in this particular, the Strict Style is more
indulgent than the Free. Palestrina constantly availed himself of
the Licence ; especially when writing for Equal Voices.
3 See vol. i. p. 736.
* See HIDDEN FIFTHS AND OCTAVES, vol. i. p. 735.
5 The earlier writers on Counterpoint insist very strongly on the
observance of this Eule ; and extend its action, with even greater
severity, to the Unison, in the few cases in which the employment
of this Interval is permitted. Fux (pp. 53, 54) is inclined to treat it
with indulgence, provided the converging Parts proceed in Conjunct
Movement ; but only on this condition. Albrechtsberper forbids the
progression in two Parts ; but sanctions it, m three. Cherubini
makes no mention of the Ku!e.
742
STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
other Part, while the other Parts fill up the
Harmony, in accordance with the laws already
laid down, as at (e\ in Ex. 3. If the last Chord
be not naturally Major, it must be made *>o, by
an accidental Sharp, or Natural.1
Ex. 1.
Canto fermo. (a)
=E
Canto fermo. £
5 «
3
3
SECOND ORDER (Two notes against one). In
this Order, two Minims must be written, in one
of the Parts, against each Semibreve in the
Canto fermo, except the last, unless the Exercise
should be in Triple Time, in which case, three
Minims must be written against each Semi-
breve.2 The other Parts must all move in Semi-
breves.
In the Part which contains the Minims, the
same note may not be struck twice in suc
cession.
The first bar should begin with a Minim Rest,
followed by a Minim, in Perfect Concord.
In the remaining bars, the first Minim must
always be a Concord, Perfect, or Imperfect.
The second Minim may be either a Concord,
or a Discord. If a Concord, it may proceed
either in Conjunct or Disjunct Movement. — Ex.
4 (ff). If a Discord, it must be both approached,
and quitted, in Conjunct Movement, and lie be
tween two Concords. In other words, it must
be treated as a Passing Note. — Ex. 4 (/).
The Part which contains the Minims is not
permitted to make the leap of a Major Sixth
under any circumstances ; and not even that of
a Minor Sixth, except as a last resource, in cases
of extreme difficulty.3 Consecutive Fifths and
Octaves between the first Minims of two succes
sive bars, are strictly forbidden. Between the
second Minims they are tolerated, but only for
the purpose of escaping from a great difficulty.
Except in the first and last bars, the Unison
is forbidden, on the Thesis, or accented part of
the measure ; but permitted, on the Arsis, or
unaccented beat. The Octave on the Arsis may
be used, with discretion ; but the Octave on the
Thesis (Ital. Ottava battuta ; Germ.Streich-Octav)
is only permitted, when approached, as in the
First Order, either in Oblique Motion, or by
i For examples of Cadences in all the Ecclesiastical Modes see
vol. ii. pp. 413, 414. 2 gee Fux, p. 63.
3 See Cherubini, p. 14 b oi Mrs. Cowdeu Clarke's translation (No-
vello 4 Co.)
separation. Its employment by approximation,
as in Ex. 4, bar 5, is permitted only in the Final
Cadence.4
In these, and all other cases, the first Minims
of the bar are subject to the same laws as the
Semibreves of the First Order ; and the more
closely these laws are observed, the better the
Counterpoint will be. If the elimination of the
second Minim in every bar, except the first, and
the last but one, should produce good Counter
point of the First Order, no stronger proof of
excellence can be desired.
The Cadence is treated like that of the First
Order ; one of the sounds necessary to form the
characteristic Intervals being assigned to the
Canto fermo, and the other, either to the Part
which contains the Minims — Ex. 4 (h) ; Ex.
5 (*) — or t° some other Part written in Semi-
breves.
Ex. 4.
Canto fermo.
bad.
(70
fi -
3 8
3 -
5 8
3 -
3 -
6 -
3 -
3 -
Canto fermo.
58 8 -
35 65
33-
THIRD ORDIR (Four notes against one). In
thia Order, four Crotchets must be written, in
one of the Parts, against each Semibreve in the
Canto fermo, except the last ; the other Parts
moving in Semibreves.
The first bar should begin with a Crotchet
Rest, followed by three Crotchets, the first of
which must form a Perfect Concord with the
Canto fermo.
The first Crotchet, in the succeeding bars, is
subject to the same laws as the first Minim in the
Second Order. The three remaining Crotchets
may form either Concords or Discords, pro
vided that, in the latter case, they proceed in
Conjunct Movement, and lie between two Con
cords ; in which respect they must be treated
like the unaccented Minims in the Second Order.
When the second Crotchet forms a Discord
with the Canto fermo, in a descending passage,
it may, by Licence, fall a Third, and then ascend
to the necessary Concord, as at (j) in Ex. 6,
and (1} in Ex. 7. This very beautiful progression,
though forbidden by Cherubini, is sanctioned by
the universal practice of the Great Masters of
the 1 6th century/'
The employment of the Tritonus, or the False
Fifth, as intervals of Melody, is forbidden, not
only by leap, but even when the intervening
sounds are filled in ; thus, the progressions, F,
G, A, B, and B, C, D, E, F, are as contrary
to rule as F, B, or B, F. This law, however, is
See footnote 5, p 7i
5 Fux, p. 65.
STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
only enforced when the dissonant sounds form
the limits of the passage; F, G-, A, B, C, is
therefore perfectly lawful. Consecutive Fifths,
Octaves, and Unisons, are forbidden, between
the first and third Crotchets in the bar ; between
the first or third Crotchets of two successive
bars; and, of course, between the last Crotchet
of one bar, and the first of the next.
The Cadence will be formed by the Canto fermo
either in conjunction with the Part containing
the Crotchets, or with one of the Parts written
in Semibreves, on the same principle as that re
commended in the Second Order. Ex. 6
Ex. 7 (m).
Ex.6.
Canto fermo. (j)
STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
743
Canto fermo.
FOURTH ORDER (with Syncopations). In
this Order, one Part must be written in synco
pated Notes ; while the others accompany the
Canto fermo in Semibreves.
The first bar must begin with a Minim Rest,
followed by a Minim, in Perfect Concord with
the Canto fermo ; which Minim must be tied to
the first Minim in the following bar, which must
always form a Concord with the lowest Part.
Ex. 8 (r).
The remaining bars (except the last) will each
contain two Minims ; the first of which must be
tied to the second Minim of the preceding bar ;
and the second, to the first Miiiim of the bar
which follows. The tied Minims, now known as
Syncopations, were formerly called Ligatures.
The second, or unaccented Minim, must always
form a Concord with the Canto fermo.
The tied, or accented Minim, may form either
a Concord, or a Discord, with the Canto fermo.
In the first case — Ex. 8 (o) ; Ex. 9 (s) — it may
proceed upwards or downwards, either in Con
junct, or Disjunct Movement. In the second
— Ex. 8 (11) ; Ex. 9 (r) — it must descend one
degree upon a Concord, which forms its natural
resolution, and may also serve to prepare a Dis
cord in the succeeding bar, as at (p) in Ex. 8.
In no case but that of the Ninth is it allowable
to let the note into which the Discord is about
to resolve be heard simultaneously with the
Discord itself in any other Part than the Bass.
Consecutive Fifths, Octaves, and Unisons, are
strictly forbidden, between the unaccented Minims
of two successive bars, which must here be
guarded as strictly as the accented Minims of
the Second Order. Indeed, the most severe test
that can be applied to this kind of Counterpoint
is, the excision of the first Minim of every bar. If
this operation should produce good Counterpoint
of the First Order, nothing more can be desired.
All the Diatonic Discords may be used by
Syncopation. But, a succession of Ninths, re
solving into Octaves, or of Sixths, followed by
Fifths, is forbidden ; because, in these cases, the
excision, of the accented Minims would produce
progressions of real Fifths and Octaves.
The Cadence, formed always by the Canto fermo
and the Part containing the Syncopations, will
consist, either of a suspended Seventh, resolving
into a Major Sixth, and followed by an Octave
-Ex. 8 (q) ; Ex. 9 (t) ; or, should the Canto
fermo be placed above the Syncopations, of a
suspended Second, resolving into a Minor Third,
and followed by an Unison, or Octave. This
Cadence was called, by the Old Masters, the
Diminished Cadence ; and was used at the close
of almost every Polyphonic Composition.
Ex. 8. 00 (o) (p) (q)
—f^-i — IT i JTJ i^ — i
igBEaEE^^fg-^ra-sj
Cant o fermo.
FIFTH ORDER (Florid Counterpoint). In this
Order, one Part will contain a judicious mixture
of all the preceding Orders ; while the other
Parts accompany the Canto fermo in consonant
Semibreves.
Dotted notes, though forbidden in all other
Orders, may here be introduced into the Florid
Part, with excellent effect ; and Quavers also,
if used sparingly, and with discretion, as at
Ex. 10 (v). Tied notes are permitted, on con
dition that the length of the second note does
not exceed that of the first. In modern pas
sages, it is sometimes convenient to use a tied
note instead of a dotted one.
By a Licence, analogous to that mentioned
with regard to the Third Order, a syncopated
Discord, suspended by a tied Crotchet, may
descend a Third, or a Fifth, and afterwards re-
ascend to its Resolution,1 as at (x), in Ex. i r ;
or, it may ascend a Fourth, or a Second, and then
re-descend to the necessary Concord, as at (y) in
Ex. 10.
A Minim, preceded, in the same bar, by two
Crotchets, should always be tied to a Minim,
or Crotchet, in the succeeding bar.2 Ex. 10 (u~).
The Diminished Cadence — Ex, 10 (to) — is used
in this Order, as well as in the Fourth, with
many graceful modifications, rendered possible,
as in Ex. n (2), by the employment of dotted,
and tied notes.3 These modifications form part
of a long list of Licences, peculiar to the Fifth
Order, and greatly conducing to its beauty, as
See Fux, p. 76.
2 Ib. p. 80.
3 Ib. p. 76.
744
STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
in Ex. ii (y\ though, unfortunately, too nu
merous for detailed notice in our present article.
Ex. 10.
Canto fermo.
Students, who have mastered all the difficul
ties of the Five Orders, are recommended, by
Fux, and his successors, to employ two or more
Orders simultaneously, in place of filling in the
free parts with Semi breves : and to follow up
this exercise by employing the Fifth Order in
all the Parts except that which contains the
Canto fermo.
It will be readily understood that the Rules
we have here endeavoured to epitomise form but a
very small proportion of those laid down by Fux,
and his successors, for the student's guidance ;
more especially with regard to the Five Orders of
Counterpoint in two Parts, the laws of which are
excessively severe. We have, in fact, confined our
selves, for the most part, to the regulations which
serve most clearly to distinguish the Strict Style
of the 1 6th century from the Free Part-writing
of the iSth and I9th. The true value of these
Rules lies in the unvarying purity of the Har
mony produced by their observance. Obedience
to their provisions renders harshness of effect
impossible. It was for this reason that they
•were so diligently studied by the Great Masters
of the School of Vienna; and, after them, by
Mendelssohn, and the Composers of the later
period. It is true, that these Composers, one
and all, have written exclusively in. the Free
Style. But, we have already explained that the
laws of the Free Style are not antagonistic to
those of Strict Counterpoint. In their treatment
of Consonant Harmonies, of Suspensions, and of
Passing Notes, the laws of the two Styles, as
set forth in the works of the great classical
writers, are absolutely identical. It is only
when dealing with Chromatic Progressions, Ap-
poggiaturas, and Unprepared Discords generally,
that the Free Style supplements the older code
with new enactments. And, since these new
enactments concern progressions altogether un
known to the Contrapuntists of the i6th century,
they cannot be fairly said to oppose the earlier
system. Except when entering upon new ground,
they neither increase nor diminish the severity
of the antient method. On the contrary, it is a
w ell-known fact that the greatest writers in the
Free Style, and the most fearless, are those who
have worked hardest at Strict Counterpoint.
i Licence. Fifths saved by a tied Crotchet, on the authority of
Palestrina. At bar o, the Tenor crosses below the Eass.
STRING.
Hence, Beethoven's bon mot concerning the ne
cessity for learning rules in order that one might
know how to break them ; so often mis-quoted in
defence of those who break them through ignor
ance. Hence, Mendelssohn's microscopic atten
tion to the minutest details, in the lessons he
gave in Free Part- writing ; and Hauptmann's
determined insistance on rules, which, though
mentioned by Fux, are unnoticed by Cherubini.
All these accomplished Musicians used Strict
Counterpoint as a stepping-stone to the Free
Style : and, if we would know how much the
process profited them, we have only to examine
Mozart's 'Zauberflote,' Beethoven's 7th Sym
phony, and Mendelssohn's ' St. Paul.' [W.S.R.]
STRINASACCHI, REGINA, a distinguished
violin-player, born at Ostiglia near Mantua in
1764, and educated at the Conservatorio della
Pieta in Venice, and in Paris. From 1780 to
1783 she travelled through Italy, and won great
admiration by her playing, her good looks, and
her attractive manners. She next went to Vienna,
and gave two concerts at the National Court
Theatre in the Burg on March 29 and April 24,
1784. For the second of these Mozart composed
a sonata in Bb (Kb'chel 454), of which he wrote
out the violin-part complete, but played the ac
companiment himself from a few memoranda
which he had dashed down on the PF. staves.2
The Emperor Joseph, noticing from his box
above the blank look of the paper on the desk,
sent for Mozart and obliged him to confess the
true state of the case. ' Strinasacchi plays with
much taste and feeling/ writes Mozart to his
father, who quite agreed with him after hearing
her at Salzburg. ' Even in symphonies? Leopold
writes to his daughter, 'she always plays with
expression, and nobody could play an Adagio
more touchingly or with more feeling than she ;
her whole heart and soul is in the melody she
is executing, and her tone is both delicate and
powerful.' In Vienna she learnt to appreciate
the gaiety of Haydn's music, so congenial to her
own character. She played his quartets before
the court at Ludwigslust, and also at Frau von
Ranzow's, with peculiar naivete" and humour,
and was much applauded for her delicate and
expressive rendering of a solo in one of them.
She is also said to have been an excellent guitar-
player. She married Johann Conrad Schlick, a
distinguished ceilist in the ducal chapel at Gotha.
The two travelled together, playing duets for
violin and cello. Schlick died at Gotha in 1825,
two year after the death of his wife. [C.F.P.]
STRING (Fr. Chord; Ital. Corda; Germ.
Saite). A slender length of gut, silk, or wire,
stretched over raised supports called bridges, be
tween which it is free to vibrate. When weighted
to resist the drawing power or tension, the
rapidity of its transverse vibrations depends upon
the tension, the length, and the specific gravity
2 This Interesting MS. is now in the possession of Mr. F. G. Kurtz
of Liverpool. Mozart filled in the complete accompaniment after
wards in an ink of slightly different colour from that which he first
employed, so that the state of the MS. at the first performance can be
readily seen.
STRING.
STRINGENDO.
745
of the material ; and in exact ratio with this
rapidity the ear is sensible of the difference of
musical pitch. From the 6th century B.C. the
monochord or single string, stretched over a
soundboard and measured by moveable bridges,
has been the canon of musical intervals, the
relative scale of pitch. The string by itself would
give but a faint tone in the surrounding air,
and a soundboard is necessary to reinforce the
tone, and make it sufficiently audible.
Of the materials employed for strings silk has been
much used in the East, but in European instruments
gut and wire have had the constant preference.
Gut (xopdy m Greek, whence the familiar ' chord')
was the musical string of the Egyptians, Greeks
and Romans ; wire was practically unknown to
them, since wire-drawing was invented only about
A.D. 1350, synchronising with the probable inven
tion of keved instruments with strings, such as
b O '
the clavichord, harpsichord or virginal. From
that epoch gut and wire have held divided rule,
as they do in our own day in the violin and the
piano. The general name for gut strings is 'cat
gut, but it is really made from the intestines of
sheep and goats, chiefly the former; the best and
strongest being of lambs' gut when the lamb is
of a certain age and development, whence it
comes that September is the month for fiddle-
string making ; particularly for first (or E) fiddle-
strings, which are the smallest though they have
to bear the greatest strain of the four. According
to Mr Hart ('The Violin,' London, 1875) tiie
best catgut strings are the Italian (the Roman
par excellence) ; next rank the German, then the
French ; last of all, the English. Mr. Hart attri
butes the superior quality of the Italian to climate,
an important part of the process of manufacture
being, in Italy, carried on in the open air, which is
naturally not always practicable in England. For
the deeper toned strings the gut is overlapped
with silver, copper or mixed metal. According
to J. Rousseau (' Trait£ de la Viole,' 1687) this
loading of the string was introduced in France
by Sainte Colombe about A.D. 1675. The tension
of the four strings of a violin was stated by
Tartini, in 1734, to be 63 Ib. Mr. Hart, for the
modern high pitch, estimates it at about 90 Ib.
— a plea for the desired adoption of the French
normal A.
Wire strings were originally of latten or brass,
with which psalteries and dulcimers were strung.
As late as the first half of the iSth century,
clavichords were generally strung with brass wire
only : pianofortes retained a batch of brass strings
until about 1830. Steel wire, as the special
iron music-wire was called, was however very
early introduced, for Virdung, whose 'Musica
getutscht und ausgezogen' is dated A.D. 1511,
expressly states that the trebles of clavichords
were then strung with steel. Early in the pre
sent century Nuremberg steel wire was in great
request, but about 1820 the Berlin wire gained
the preference. The iron of both came from the
1 The origin of the term catgut has not yet been traced. It is
difficult not to believe it to be a corruption of some similarly sound
ing Italian term, of probably quite difl'erent meaning. [(*.]
Hartz mountains. About 1834 Webster of Bir
mingham brought out cast steel for music wire,
and gave piano strings a breaking weight of
about one third more than the German. But in
1850 Miller of Vienna was able to contend for
the first place, and in the following year actually
gained it at the Great Exhibition, for cast steel
wire-drawing. After that, Pohlmann of Nurem
berg came forward and was considered by some
experts to have surpassed Miller.2 Webster's
firm has not been idle during a competition to
the results of which the present power of the
pianoforte to stand in tune owes so much. A
recent trial made under direction of the writer
gives for average breaking weight of 24 inches,
of no. I7| wire, Pohlrnann's 297 Ib., Miller's
275lb., Webster and Horsfall 257 Ib., all nearly
doubling the tension required for use. It is not
therefore with surprise that we accept the emi
nent authority of Dr. William Pole, who regards
cast steel music-wire as the strongest elastic ma
terial that exists. The earliest covered piano
strings, about a hundred years ago, spun in long
interstices of brass over steel, have in time become
close spun in single, double, and even treble over-
layings of copper, or mixed metal composed of
spelter and copper, gaining in the largest strings
a diameter of 0-21 of an inch, and considerable
power of strain. The greatest tension of a string
recorded by Messrs. Broadwood in the technical
part of their Exhibition book of 1862 is 315 Ib.
—for the highest single string of a Concert Grand.
They give the whole tension at that time for
Philharmonic pitch (viz. A 454, C 540 double
vibrations per second) of two of their Concert
Grands, as well as the tension of each separate
note. The first of the two is 34,670^. (15 tons
9 cwt. etc.) ; the other, a longer scale, 37,160 Ib.
(16 tons ii cwt. etc.). In the last twenty years
tension has been increased, but not sufficiently so
to account for the much higher totals or for the
breaking-weights of wire recorded in Mendel's
Lexicon. ' [A.J.H.]
STRING. The terms ' Strings,' ' Stringed in
struments,' 'String-quartet/ ' String- trio/ have
come to be applied in England to instruments
of the violin tribe only, the terms answering
to the German Streichquartet, Streichinstrumente.
Thus a quartet for four stringed instruments,
usually two violins, viola, and cello, is called
a String-quartet, to distinguish it from a piano
forte quartet — that is, for piano and three other
instruments ; or for any other combination of
four, such as a quartet for four horns, four flutes,
etc. [G.]
STRINGENDO, 'forcing, compelling'; press
ing or hastening the time. This word conveys,
besides the idea of simple acceleration of pace, that
of growing excitement working up to some climax ;
and in the opinion of some authorities on the
subject, the acceleration may not unfrequently be
accompanied by a slight crescendo, unless of course
there is any mark to the contrary. [J.A.F.M.]
2 Unpublished correspondence of Theobald Bulim, the flautist,
shows that I'olilniauu was indebted to him .or improving his manu
facture.
746
STEINGPLATE.
STRINGPLATE (Fr. Sommier en fer; Ital.
Cordiera ; Germ. Anhanyeplatte, Metallner Sai-
tenhalter}. The iron plate on the hitchpin block
of pianofortes to which the further ends of the
strings are now attached. It forms with the
tension bars the metal framing of the instrument ;
the wooden framing being a bracing more or less
complete of wooden beams, in connection with
the wresfcplank, which is also of wood, and some
times covered with metal. [See WRESTPLANK.]
The service of the stringplate is one of weight ;
it bears an important share in resisting the con
tinual draught of the strings. It was invented,
rather with the idea of compensation than resist
ance, by William Allen, a tuner in Stodart's em
ploy, and was patented by James Thorn and Allen
in January 1820. A rigid stringplate was intro
duced by James and Thomas Broadwood in the
following year ; it was the invention of one of
their workmen, Samuel Herve. The single cast
ing for stringplate and general resistance was
the idea of Alpheus Babcock, of Boston, U. S.
1825 ; and was meritoriously improved and
rendered practicable by Conrad Meyer of Phila
delphia, U.S. in 1833. The important systems
of construction that have arisen from the use
of iron in stringplates and bars are described
under PIANOFORTE. [A.J.H.]
STROGERS, NICHOLAS, an organist in the
reign of James I., composer of a Morning and
Evening Service printed by Barnard. Two an
thems by him, ' Domine non est exaltatum' and
* O God be merciful,' are in the Library of Peter-
house, Cambridge. An organ part of the latter
is in the library of Ely Cathedral. In Christ-
church, Oxford, are two entire Services (A minor,
D minor), two Motets, and Fancies. [W.H.H.]
STROHFIEDEL, i.e. Strawfiddle (Ital. Stic-
cato; Fr.Claquebois; Germ, also HolzharmoniJca),
is described by Mendel in his Lexicon as a very
ancient and widespread instrument, found prin
cipally among the Russians, Poles, and Tartars,
consisting of a range of flat pieces of deal or
1 glass, of no settled number, tuned to the scale,
arranged on belts of straw, and struck with two
small hammers, after the manner of the common
glass ' Harmonica ' toy.
Its sound is sweet and bell-like, but weak ;
and many an English reader will share the sur
prise expressed by Mendelssohn a propos to
GUSIKOW'S performance upon it. ' With a few
sticks, lying on straw and struck with other
sticks, he does what is possible only on the most
perfect instrument. How from such materials
even the small tone produced — more like a
Papageno-fife than anything else — can be ob
tained, is a mystery to me.' (Mendelssohn Family,
1836, Feb. 12.) Gusikow's Strohfiedel, however,
seems to have been an improved kind. It was
strong enough to bear the accompaniment of two
violins and a cello. The Strohfiedel is intro
duced into the orchestra in Lumbye's 'Traum-
bildern.' [G.]
i Burney (' Present State,' u. 71) found it at Dresden, and, under the
name of Strofil, describes it as made vith glass, and played on with
sticks, ' like the sticcado.'
STUDIES.
STROHMEYER, CARL, a bass singer— then
a Kammersanger at Weimar — who sang in a fes
tival at Frankenhausen in June 1810, and is men
tioned by Spohr for the extraordinary compass
£. of his voice (see Spohr's 'Selbst-
^ biographic,' i. 142). He was born
p[L: ~ in the Stollberg district in 1870,
and was employed successively at
Gotha and at Weimar, at which
latter place he died, Nov. n, 1845. [G.]
STROQD, CHARLES, born about 1705, was
educated as a chorister of the Chapel Royal
under Dr. Croft. After quitting the choir he
officiated as deputy organist for his instructor
and became organist of Whitehall Chapel. He
died April 26, 1726, and was buried in the west
cloister of Westminster Abbey. He is known
as a composer by his beautiful anthem, 'Hear my
prayer, O God,' included in Page's 'Harmonia
Sacra.' [W.H.H.]
STRUENSEE. A tragedy by Michael Beer,
in 5 acts ; to which his brother, G. Meyerbeer,
wrote an Overture and three Entr'actes — ' Der
Aufruhr,' 'Der Ball,' and 'Der Dorfschenke '
respectively ; also a March and a Benediction in
the last act, a Polonaise, and some smaller pieces
elsewhere. Struensee was given for the first
time with the music at Berlin, Sept. 21, 1847,
sixteen years after the death of its author. [G.]
STUDIES (Fr. Etudes ; Ger. Etuden, Studien).
The name given to a large class of musical com
positions, of extremely varied scope and design,
but always having, as the name implies, the
cultivation of the powers of execution for their
chief object. Studies have been written for nearly
every instrument, but since the principles which
govern their construction and employment are in
all cases the same, it will be sufficient here to
speak of Pianoforte Studies, which form the great
majority of all those in existence.
Mechanical facility upon the pianoforte is
achieved in the first place by the practice of
technical exercises, so called, such as are found
in every pianoforte school, and in the works of
Plaidy, Loschhorn, Eggeling, and many others,
and consist of isolated passages, scales, arpeggios,
etc., generally played by each hand separately
or by both in unison. Following these comes
the Study proper, in which opportunity is af
forded for the application of the principles of
execution to the performance of actual music.
For this purpose it is not necessary that the
study should possess any value as a composition,
indeed it would be in some respects inexpedient,
first, because the student's attention might be
diverted by the attractiveness of the music from
those questions of touch and mechanism which
ought to occupy it exclusively, and secondly,
because musical interest is scarcely compatible
with that constant reiteration of a single figure
which is required by considerations of technique.
Accordingly, we find that the most valuable
studies of this class, such as those by Czerny,
Kessler, Kohler, Mayer, etc., consist for the most
part of a single passage repeated with simple
STUDIES.
harmonies and modulations in many various posi
tions, by the practice of which a much more per
fect mastery is gained over difficulties than could
possibly result from the study of any composition
offering a greater variety of passages.
But studies such as those described form but
a part of what is required for the perfecting of
execution. So soon as a certain degree of facili ty
has been attained, and correct habits formed,
studies affording a far greater amount of musical
interest, though still constructed on the same
lines, have to be attacked. Pre-eminent among
these are the studies of Cramer, dementi (Gradus
ad Parnassian), Moscheles (ops. 70 and 95), and
Haberbier (Etudes Poesies), many of which are
extremely interesting and attractive works. Other
studies there are which have for their object the
development of the execution in some one special
direction, such as Heller's 'Art of Phrasing,' op.
1 6, Killer's ' Rhythmische Studien,' op. 56, Thai-
berg's ' L'art du Chant applique" au Piano/ etc ,
the intention of which is sufficiently indicated
by their titles, Lastly there are the so-called
Concert Studies (in German Vortragsstudien —
studies of performance) usually of extreme diffi
culty, and valuable to the student, as affording
an insight into the nature of the special difficulties
to be met with in the other works of their re
spective composers, together with practice in the
means of conquering them, and to the artist, as
forming short pieces of great brilliancy, suitable
for the concert room. Among the principal studies
of this kind may be named those of Chopin,
Henselt, Liszt, Rubinstein, and Schumann
(Etudes Symphoniques). [F.T.]
STUCK, German for Piece. A 'Concert-
stuck ' — a term which has puzzled many an
English amateur — such aa Weber's for Piano, or
Schumann's for 4 Horns, is merely a ' Concert-
piece,' not quite a Concerto, but nearly the
same. [G.]
STUTTERHEIM, JOSEPH, Austrian Field-
Marshal-Lieutenant, on whom Beethoven con
ferred the distinguished honour of dedicating his
last Quartet (op. 131), was born at Neustadt, in
Moravia, 1764, and died at Lemberg, July 21,
1831. As son of an officer he received a military
education, passing through the various grades of
the service to that of colonel; for good conduct
at the battle of Aspern was promoted to the
rank of major-general, and in 1815 to that above
named.
In 1824 he was appointed member of, the im
perial council and much employed in the re
organisation of the army. Here Beethoven's
friend Stephan von Breuning, Hofrath in the
Ministry of War, became favourably known to
him, and was thus able to obtain an appointment
for Beethoven's nephew, Carl, in the regiment of
which Stutterheim was ' Inhaber.' Beethoven,
grateful for this kindness, dedicated the quartet
to him. [A.W.T.]
STUTTGART CONSERVATORIUM. The
salient particulars of this well-known school will
be found under the head of STARK. Miss ANNA
SUBJECT.
747
MEHLIG (now Mrs. Rudolf Falk) is the only
pianoforte player of great eminence whom the
Conservatorium can claim to have formed. [G.]
SUBDIAPENTE. A polyglot word, half Latin
half Greek, to signify a fifth below, just as 'Epi-
diapente ' signified a fifth above. A ' Canon in
Subdiapente ' was a canon in which the answer
was a fifth below the lead. Similarly ' Subdiates-
saron ' is a fourth below, and ' Epidiatessaron ' a
fourth above. [G.]
SUBDOMINANT. The fourth note of the
scale upwards. The note below the dominant,
as F in the key of C. The radical bass of the
penultimate chord in the Plagal cadence. When
groups of movements are balanced together in
threes the central one is most frequently in the
key of the subdominant, as in sonatas of three
movements, the minuet and trio form, marches,
valses, etc. In the actual body of a large move
ment in forms of the sonata order, the key of the
subdominant is not antithetically acceptable, and
examples of its occurrence in modern music as
the key of the second section or second subject
are extremely rare, and evidently not well ad
vised. But in dependence on the tonic key it is
one of the most important of harmonic centres,
and digressions in that direction are very common
in modern music. [C.H.H.P.]
SUBJECT. The theme, or leading idea, on
which a musical Composition is based. A piece
of Music can no more be composed without a
Subject, than a sermon can be preached without
a text. Rich Harmonies, and graceful Passages,
may be strung together, in any number; but, if
they be not suggested by a leading thought, they
will mean nothing. The ' leading thought' is the
Subject : and the merit of the Composition based
upon that Subject will depend, in the first place,
upon the worthiness of the idea, and, in the
second, upon the skill with which the Composer
discourses upon it.
Subjects may be divided into as many classes
as there are classes of Composition : for, every
definite Art-form is based upon a Subject in
harmony with its own peculiar character.
I. The earliest known form of Subject is the
Ecclesiastical Cantus firmus.1 The most im
portant varieties of this are the Plain Chaunt
Melodies of the Antiphon,2 and those of the
Hymn.3 The former admits of no rhythmic ictus
beyond that demanded by the just delivery of the
words to which it is set. The latter fell, even in
very early times, into a more symmetrical vein,
suggested by the symmetry of the Verse, or Prose,
cultivated by the great mediaeval Hymnologists,
though it was not until the close of the I5th, or
beginning of the i6th century, that it developed
itself, in Germany, into the perfectly rhythmic
and metrically regular melody of the Choral.4
Upon a phrase of this Plain Chaunt, the in
ventors of Harmony discoursed, at will : in other
words, they treated it as a Subject. Composers
of the nth century discoursed upon it by singing-
i See PLAIN-SONO.
a See HYMN.
2 See ANTIPHON.
4 See CHUBAL.
748
SUBJECT.
a Second Part against the given Subject, in Plain
Counterpoint — Note against * Note. They sang
this Part extempore : and, because it was sung
by a second Voice, it was called Discantus — the
literal meaning of which is, a Song sung by two
Voices. The Song, in this case, was not a very
poetical one : but, it was fairly and logically
deduced from the Cantus firmns, and therefore
perfectly reasonable. Our English verb ' to des
cant ' is derived from this process of deduction,
and describes it exactly ; for good Discantus con
tains nothing that is not suggested by the Cantus
fcrmus, as in the following example, from Morley's
'Plaine and easie Introduction.'
Discant.
E£ &
^
~5 — ?r::i~
yt-^ "
tr
-&>-
_^
)• f ^j
^J 1
•
J
2
. .
Canto Fermo (here treated as the Subject).
H:
— &> ^y-
-&• 0
— „
l rn H
II
: . -
When extempore Discant gave place to written
Counterpoint, the Cant usfirmus was still retained,
and sung, by the Tenor, in long sustained notes,
while other Voices discoursed upon it, no longer
note against note, but, as Art progressed, in pas
sages of Imitation, sometimes formed from the
actual notes of the Canto fermo, sometimes so
contrived as to contrast with it, in pure Harmony,
but with unlimited variety of Rhythm.2 And this
arrangement brought two classes of Theme into
simultaneous use — the Plain Chaunt basis of the
whole, and the Point of Imitation — the first of
which was technically distinguished as the Canto
fermo, while the last, in process of time, ap
proached very nearly to the true Subject of the
modern Schools. The two forms are very clearly
shown in Palestrina's Missa 'Ecce Sacerdos
3magnus,' in which the long notes of the Canto
fermo never fail to present themselves in one or
other of the Vocal Parts, however elaborate may
be the Imitations carried on in the rest.
II. By a process not uncommon in the develop
ment of specific Art-forms, the long-drawn notes
of the Canto fermo, after giving birth to a more
vivacious form of Subject, fell gradually into dis
use; appearing, if at all, by Diminution, or
Double Diminution, in notes as short as those
formerly used for Points of Imitation. In this
manner, the antient Canto fermo became a .Sub
ject, properly so called ; and, as a Subject, was
made the groundwork of a regular Fugue. This
process of development is strikingly exemplified
in Palestrina's 'Missa L'Homme armeY in some
of the Movements of which the quaint old Melody
1 See STRICT COUNTERPOINT.
2 See POLYPHONIA.
s Published iu Breitkopf & Mitel's edition, vol. x.
SUBJECT.
is treated, in Longs, and Larges, as a Canto fermo,
while, in others, it is written, in Semibreves, and
Minims, as a Fugal Subject.1
We do not mean to imply that Palestrina in
vented this mode of treatment : but only, that
he availed himself of all the good things that
had been used by his predecessors. The laws of
Fugue were established more than a century
before his time. Not the laws of what we now
call Fugue; but those of the Real Fugue of the
Middle Ages — a form of Composition which differs
very materially from that brought to perfection
by the Great Masters of the iSth century. Real
Fugue was of two kinds — Limited, and Free.5 In
Limited Real Fugue, the Imitation was carried
on from the beginning to the end of the Composi
tion, forming what we now call Canon. In Free
Real Fugue, it was not continued beyond the
duration of the Subject itself. In the former case,
the Theme of the Composition was called a Guida
— that is, a Subject which serves as a ' Guide'
to the other Parts, which imitate it, note for
note, throughout. In Free Real Fugue, the
Theme was called Subjectum, Propositio, or Dux:
Soggetto, Proposta, or, if very short, Attacco:
Fuhrer, Aufgabe, or Hauptsatz. The early Eng
lish writers called it Point ; but this word is
now applied, like the Italian Attacco, to little
passages of Imitation only, and the leading idea
of the Fugue is simply called the Subject.
The Subject of the Real Fugue — except in the
Limited species — was always very short, fre
quently consisting of no more than three or four
notes, after the statement of which the Part was
free to move in any direction it pleased. But,
the treatment of these few notes was very strict.
Every Interval proposed by the leading Part was
answered by the same Interval in every other
Part. The Answer, therefore, corresponded ex
actly with the Subject, either in the Fifth, or
Fourth, above, or below; and it was necessary
that its Solmisation should also correspond with
that of the Subject, in another Hexachord.6 But,
the Subject, and the Answer, had each a dis
tinguishing name. The Theme and its reply were
called, in various languages, Dux and Comes,
Propositio and Responsum, or Antecedens and
Consequens ; Proposta and Risposta, or Ante-
cedente and Consequenza ; Fiihrer and Gefahrte,
or Antwort; Demande and Re'ponse. In Eng
lish, Subject and Answer ; or, more rarely, Ante
cedent and Consequent.
III. So long as the Ecclesiastical Modes re
mained in use, Real Fugue was the only species
possible : but, as these were gradually replaced
by our modern system of tonality, Composers
invented a new kind of Fugue, formed upon a
Subject the character of which differed entirely
from that used by the older Masters. This form
of Composition is now called Tonal Fugue.7 It
is generally described as differing from Real
Fugue chiefly in the construction of the Answer.
Undoubtedly, this definition disposes of its most
essential characteristic. But, there are other
See EEAL FDQDE.
See TONAL FUGUE.
See L'HOMME
SeeHEXACHOKD; SOL1IISATIOX.
SUBJECT.
SUBJECT.
749
differences between the two forms which cannot
be thus lightly passed over. So far as the
Answer is concerned, it is enough to say that
its Intervals do not furnish an exact reproduction
of those of the Subject ; being governed, as to
their arrangement, by laws which scarcely fall
within the scope of our present article. The
Subject, on the other hand, presents so many
varieties of form and expression, that it cannot
be too carefully considered. In the hands of the
Great Masters, it presents an epitome of the
entire Fugue, into which nothing is admissible
which is not in some way suggested by it : and,
in order that it may serve this comprehensive
purpose, it must needs be very carefully con
structed. The Subjects employed by the great
Fuguists are always found to be capable of
suggesting a logical Answer, and one or more
good * Counter-Subjects ; of being conveniently
and neatly broken into fragments, for purposes
of collateral discussion; of intertwining their
various members among the involutions of an
ingenious Stretto ; and of lending themselves to
a hundred other devices, which are so intimately
connected with the conduct of the Fugue itself,
that the necessary qualities of the Subject will
be better understood by reference to our general
article on TONAL FUGUE, than by separate de
scription here.
IV. We have shown how the fathers of Compo
sition treated the Canto fermo : how their imme
diate successors enveloped it in a network of
ingenious Points of Imitation : how, by fusing the
Points of Imitation, and the Canto fermo which
suggested them, into a homogeneous Theme, the
Polyphonic Composers gave birth to that im
portant factor in Composition which we call a
Subject : and how that Subject was treated by
the great Fuguists of the iSth century- We
have now to see how these Fuguists revived the
Canto fermo, and employed it simultaneously
with the newer Subject. Not that there was
ever a period when it fell into absolute desue
tude : but, it was once so little used, that the
term, revived, may be very fairly applied to the
treatment it experienced from Handel and Bach,
and their great contemporaries.
And, now, we must be very careful about the
terms we use : terms which we can scarcely mis
apply, if we are careful to remember the process
by which the Subject grew out of the Canto
fermo. The German Composer of the i8th cen
tury learned the Melody of the Chorale in his
cradle, and used it constantly: treating 'Kommt
Menschenkinder, ruhmt, und preist,' and ' Nun
ruhen alle W alder,' as Palestrina treated ' Ecce
Sacerdos magnus,' and ' L'Homtne arms'. ' Some
times he converted the traditional Melody into
a regular Subject, as in the 'Osanna' of the last-
named Mass. Sometimes, he retained the long
notes, enriching them with a Florid Counter
point, as in the ' Kyrie.' In the first instance,
there was no doubt about the nomenclature :
the term, Subject, was applied to the Choral
Melody, as a matter of course. In the other
i See COUNTER SUBJECT.
case, there was a choice. When the Melody
of the Chorale was made to pass through the
regular process of Fugal Exposition, and a
new contrapuntal melody contrasted with it, in
shorter notes, the former was called the Subject,
and the latter, the Counter-Subject. When the
Counterpoint furnished the Exposition, and the
Chorale was occasionally heard against it, in
long sustained notes, the first was called the
Subject, and the second, the Canto fermo, Seb.
Bach has left us innumerable examples of both
methods of treatment, in his ' Choral -Vorspiele,'
' Kirch en-Cantaten,' and otber works. A fine
specimen of the Chorale, treated as a Subject,
will be found in the well-known 'S. Anne's
Fugue.' In the Motet, 'Ich lasse dich nicht,'2
the Chorale 'Weil du mein Gott und Vater
bisb,' is sung, quite simply, in slow notes, as a
Canto fermo, against the quicker Subject of the
Fugue. In the ' Vorspiel,' known in England
as ' The Giant,' the Chorale ' Wir glauben all' an
einen Gott/ forms the Subject of a regular Fugue,
played on the Manuals, while a stately Counter-
Subject is played, at intervals, on the Pedals.
A still grander example is the opening Move
ment of the ' Credo ' of the Mass in B minor, in
which the Plain Chaunt Intonation, 'Credo in
unum Deum,' is developed into a regular Fugue,
by the Voices, while an uninterrupted Counter
point of Crotchets is played by the instrumental
Bass. In neither of these cases would it be easy
to misapply the words Subject, Counter-Subject,
or Canto fermo ; but, the correct terminology is
not always so clearly apparent. In the year
1747, Bach was invited to Potsdam by Frede
rick the Great, who gave him a Subject, for the
purpose of testing his powers of improvisation.
We may be sure that the great Fuguist did full
justice to this, at the moment : but, not con
tented with extemporising upon it, he paid the
Royal Amateur the compliment of working it
up, at home, in a series of Movements which he
afterwards presented to King Frederick, under
the title of ' Musikalisches Opfer.' In working
this out, he calls the theme, in one place, *I1
Soggetto Reale ' ; and, in another, ' Thema re-
gium.' It is quite clear that in these cases he
attached the same signification to the terms
Thema and Soggetto ; and applied both to the
principal Subject ; treating the Violin and Flute
passages in the Sonata, and the florid Motivo in
the Canon, as Counter-Subjects. But, in another
work, founded on a Theme by Legrenzi, he
applies the term 'Thema/ to the principal Motivo,
and 'Subjectum/ to the subordinate one.3 We
must suppose, therefore, that the two terms
were in Bach's time, to a certain extent inter
changeable.
Handel, though he did occasionally use the
Canto fermo as Bach used it, produced his best
effects in quite a different way. In the ' Funeral
2 Ascribed by Schicht and Albrechtsberger to Sebastian Bach ;
but now more frequently attributed to Johann Christoph. [See
vol. i. p. Ilia.]
3 ' Thema Legrenzianum pedaliter elaboratum cum subjecto.'
The original MS. of this work has disappeared. Messrs. Peters, of
Leipzig, have published it in Cahier 4 of their edition of the Organ
Works, on the authority of a copy by Andreas Bach.
750
SUBJECT.
SUBJECT.
Anthem,' he treats the Chorale, 'Heir Jesu
Christ' first as a Canto fermo and then, in
shorter notes, as a regularly- worked Subject.
'As from the power of sacred lays' is founded
upon a Chorale, sung in Plain Counterpoint by
all the Voices ; it therefore stands as the Sub
ject of the Movement, while the Counter-Subject
is entirely confined to the Instrumental Accom
paniment. In ' 0 God, who from the suckling's
mouth,' in the 'Foundling Anthem/ the Melody
of ' Aus tiefer Noth ' is treated as an orthodox
Canto fermo, after the manner of the Motet, ' Ich
lasse dich nicht,' already quoted. But, this was
not Handel's usual practice. His Canti fermi are
more frequently confined to a few notes only of
Plain Chaunt, sung slowly, to give weight to the
regularly -developed Subject, as in ' Sing ye to
the Lord,' the ' Hallelujah Chorus,' the last
Chorus in the ' Utrecht Te Deum/ the second in
the 'Jubilate,' the Second Chandos Anthem, 'Let
God arise,' the last Chorus in 'Esther,' and other
places too numerous to mention.1
The use of the long-drawn Canto-fermo is fast
becoming a lost art; yet the effect with which
Mendelssohn has introduced 'Wir glauben all'
an einen Gott,' in combination with the primary
Subject of ' But our God abideth in Heaven,' in
' S. Paul,' has not often been surpassed. Mozart
also has left us a magnificent instance, in the last
Finale of 'Die Zauberfl ote, ' where he has en
veloped the Chorale, 'Ach Gott vom Himmel
sieh darein,' in an incomparable network of in
strumental Counterpoint : and Meyerbeer has
introduced two clever and highly effective imit
ations of the real thing, in ' Les Huguenots/ at
the 'Litanies/ and the 'Conjuration.'
V. The similarity of the Canti fermi, and even
of the true Subjects, used by great Composers,
and handed on, from generation to generation,
has given rise to much ingenious speculation.
I. A remarkable instance of this is a passage of
slow notes, rising from the Tonic to the Sub-
Dominant, and then descending towards the note
from whence it started. This passage is con
stantly found in old Ecclesiastical Melodies;
among others, in that of the Hymn '^Eterna
Christi munera.' Zarlino used it as a Theme
for his examples in Counterpoint. In Morley's
' Plain and easie Introduction,' Philomathes
gives it to Polymathes, as a Point 'familiar
enough, and easie to bee maintained' — i.e. de
veloped : while the ' Master ' calls it ' a most
common Point,' which 'though it were giuen
to all the Musicians of the world, they might
compose vpon it, and not one of their Com
positions bee like vnto that of another.' Byrd
used it, in 'Non nobis' [which see] ; Palestrina,
in the first 'Agnus Dei' of his ' Missa brevis';
Bach, in the ' Gratias agimus ' and ' Dona ' of
his Mass in B minor ; Handel, in ' Sing ye to the
Lord,' the 'Hallelujah Chorus/ the last Chorus
in the ' Utrecht Te Deum,' the Chamber Duet,
' Tacete, ohime !' and many other places; Steffani,
1 A learned modern critic finds fault with Burney for calling the
Canto-fermo in 'Sing ye to the Lord' a Counter-Subject ; but falls
into the same error himself in describing the Utrecht ' Jubilate.'
in his Duet, ' Tengo per infallibile '; Perti, in a
Fuga a 8, ' Ut nos possimus ' ; Mendelssohn, in
'Not only unto him/ from 'S. Paul'; and Bee
thoven, in the Trio of the 9th Symphony. And,
in strange contrast to all these grand Composi
tions, an unknown French Composer used it, with
remarkable effect, in ' Malbrook s'en-va-t-en
guerre.' The truth is, the passage is simply a
fragment of the Scale, which is as much the com
mon property of Musicians, whether Fuguists, or
Composers of the later Schools, as the Alphabet
is the common property of Poets.2
£= =^s_g«_g_a_^ —
2. Another Subject, scarcely less universal in its
application, embraces a more extended portion of
the scale. Bach uses this in the ' Weihnachts
Oratorium.' Handel, in the 'Hailstone Chorus';
in a remarkable Concerto for two Orchestras, of
which the only known copy is the original Auto
graph at Buckingham Palace ; in ' Worthy is the
Lamb ' ; in ' When his loud Voice/ and in many
other places. Mozart used it, in a form all but
identical with Handel's, and also in the inverted
form, in the Jupiter Symphony. Beethoven used
it in his First Symphony; in his Sonata, Op. 31.
No. I ; and in the inverted form, in his Symphony
in C minor. Schumann, in his Stringed Quartet,
No. i, and his PF. Quartet, Op. 47 ; and Brahms,
in the Finale to his Symphony in C Minor.
3. These examples deal only with the Scale. But
there are certain progressions which are as much
common property as the Scale itself; just as there
are certain combinations of letters which are as
much common property as the Alphabet. First
among these stand the leaps of Fifths or Fourths,
with which countless Subjects begin ; and scarcely
less common are the Sequences of ascending
Fourths and descending Fifths, which we so
frequently find associated with them : as in Bach's
Fugue in Eb— No. 31 of the XL VIII ; Mozart's
Overture to ' Die Zauberflote/ and a hundred
other cases.
4. Closely allied to these Sequences of Fourths
and Fifths, is a form in which a descending Third
is followed by an ascending Fourth. This was
used for a Canon, by Turini, in the iyth cen
tury ; in Handel's Second Hautboy Concerto, and
third Organ Fugue ; Morley's Canzonet, 'Cruel,
you pull away too soon'; Purcell's ' Full fathom
five'; and numerous other cases, including a
Subject given to Mendelssohn for improvisation
at Eome, Nov. 23, 1830.
— »-
3=T
!
2 In the following examples, we give the primary form, only;
leaving our readers to compare it, for themselves, with the Composi
tions to which we have reierred.
SUBJECT.
5. A Subject, characterised by the prominent
use of a Diminished Seventh, and familiar, as
that of 'And with His stripes,' is also a very
common one. Handel himself constantly used
it as a Theme for improvisation ; and other Com
posers have used it also : notably Mozart, in the
Kyrie of the ' Requiem.'
SUBJECT.
751
7
6. The Intonation and Reciting-Note of the
Second Gregorian Tone — used either with, or
without, the first note of the Mediation — may
also be found in an infinity of Subjects, both
antient and modern; including that of Bach's
Fugue in E, no. 33, and the Finale of the
Jupiter Symphony.
The number of Subjects thus traceable from
one Composer to another is so great, that it
would be impossible to give even a list of Athena.
In fact, as Sir Frederick Ouseley has very justly
observed, ' it is perhaps difficult for a Composer
of the present day to find a great variety of
original Fugue-Subjects.' But, the treatment
may be original, though the Subject has been
used a thousand times; and these constantly-
recurring Subjects are founded upon progressions
which, more than any others, suggest new Counter-
Subjects in infinite variety.
VI. The Subject of Canon differs from that of
Fugue, in that it is continuous. The Subject is
as long as the Canon itself. Hence, it is called
the Guida, or Guide; each note in the leading
part directing those that are to be sung by all
the other Voices in turn. Subjects of this kind
will be found in vol. ii. pp. 228 a, 2290., 461 6,
464 h, 465 a, and other places ; and many more
may be seen in the pages of Burney and Haw
kins. Examples of the method of fitting these
Subjects together will be found in vol. i. pp. 303 6,
304 a, and in vol. ii. p. 2286. The number of
passages that can be made to fit together in
Canon is so limited, that the same notes have
been used, over and over again, by writers of all
ages. A remarkable instance of this is afforded
by ' Non nobis.' We have seen how many Com
posers have chosen this as a Fugal Subject ; and
an account of it, with some solutions in Canon
not generally known, will be found at vol.ii. p. 464.
It must not, however, be supposed that the older
Composers alone were able to produce fine Canons.
Haydn thoroughly understood the Art of writing
them [see vol. i. 7106] ; and so graceful are
Mozart's that their Subjects might very easily
be mistaken for those of an ordinary Part-Song.1
VII. Closely allied to the Subject of the Canon
is that of the ' Rota,' or Round. In this, and
in its comic analogue the Catch, the Guida is
followed by every Voice in turn ; for which
reason the Composition was formerly written
) See a large collection of examples in Merrick's English Transla
tion of Albrechtsbereer, vol. 11. pp. 415 — i32.
on a single Stave. It will be found so written
in a facsimile of the oldest example we possess,
at page 269 of the present volume : and it is
virtually so written, even at the present day ;
though, in modern copies, the Guida is doubled
back, so to speak, each time a new Voice enters,
so as to give the outward appearance of a Score.
That it is not really a Score is evident, from the
fact that there is not a separate Part for each
Voice ; but, there is a substantial difference
between this and the Canon, though the Subject
of both is called a Guida. In the Canon, the
Subject forms the whole Composition. In the
Round, it continues only until the entrance of
the second Voice, the later sections of the Guida
representing Counter-Subjects only, and continu
ing to furnish new Counter-Subjects as often as
new Voices enter.
It is remarkable that this, the oldest form of
ssecular Part-writing in existence, should not
only have been invented in England, but should
still be more highly esteemed in England than
in any other country — for it is only in England
that the art of singing a Round is practised with
success, and the success with which we practise
it dates from the time of the Plantagenets.*
VIII. In turning from the learned complexities
of Fugue and Canon, to the simple Subject of
the Dance-Tune, we are not, as might be sup
posed, retracing our steps, but following the line
traced out for us by the natural development of
Art. When Instrumental Music first began to at
tract attention, the Fugue was regarded as the
embodiment of its highest expression. Lulli ended
his Overtures with a Fugue; but as time pro
gressed this form of Finale was superseded by that
of the Dance-Tune. The most common types were
those of the Minuet, the Gavotte, the Bourre'e, the
Courante, the Chaconne, the Sarabande, the Giga,
and the closely allied Tunes of the Allemande,
the Ritornello, the Air, and the March. They
originally consisted, for the most part, of two
short Strains, the first of which stated the Sub
ject, while the second developed it according to
its means. It was de rigueur that the Minuet
should be written in Triple Time, and that each
phrase of its Subject should begin with the
down-beat of the bar — though, in later times,
most Minuets began with the third beat: that
the Gavotte should be in Alia breve Time, be
ginning at the half-bar : that the Bourre'e should
be in Common Time, beginning on the fourth
beat ; that the Allemande should be in Com
mon, and the Giga in Compound Common Time,
each beginning, as a general rule, with a single
short note : and so with the rest. It was indis
pensable that the First Strain, representing the
Subject, should be complete in itself, though it
did not always end in the Key in which it began.
The development of the Subject, in the Second
Strain, usually consisted in the prolongation of
the Melody by means of phrases, which, in the
finer examples, were directly derived from itself;
sometimes carrying a characteristic figure through
2 See SCHOOLS OP COMPOSITION, Section XVI ; ROUND ; SUMEE is
ICU11EN IN.
752
SUBJECT.
two or more closely-related Keys ; sometimes re
turning, after this process, to the initial Strain,
and thus completing the symmetry of the Move
ment in accordance with principles of the deepest
artistic significance. The most highly-developed
forms were those of the Courante and Allemande.
In these, the First Strain, if in the Major Mode,
almost invariably modulated to the Dominant,
for the purpose of proceeding to a formal close in
that Key : if in the Minor Mode, it proceeded,
in like manner, to the Relative Major. The
Second Strain then started with a tolerably exact
reproduction of the initial Subject in the new
Key, or some other closely related to it ; and
the Reprise terminated with the transposition to
the original -Key of that portion of the First
Strain which had first appeared in the Dominant,
or Relative Major. In these forms, the share of
interest allotted to the process of development
was very small indeed, compared with that ab
sorbed by the Subject itself; insomuch that, in
many very fine examples, the entire Movement
consisted of little more than a Subject artfully
extended by the articulation of two members of
not very unequal proportions.
IX. Very different from this was the next
manifestation of progressive power. Taking the
lines of the Allemande as the limit of his general
contour, Haydn used a primary Subject, of com
paratively limited dimensions, as the foundation
of a Movement of greater length and higher deve
lopment than any previously attempted. For this
form a good Subject was of paramount import
ance ; but its office was that of a text, and nothing
more : the real interest of the Movement lay in
the completeness of its treatment. And, because
no form of treatment can be complete without
the element of contrast, the Father of the Sym
phony enriched his new Art-form with a Second
Subject, so constructed as to enhance the beauty
of the Primary Theme by the introduction of
some form of expression distinctly opposed to it.
Presented for the first time immediately after
the first great Modulation to the Dominant or
Relative Major, the subordinate Motive naturally
brought the First Section of the Movement to
a conclusion, in one or other of those nearly re
lated Keys ; and, naturally also, reappeared after
the Reprise, with the transposition necessary to
terminate the Second Section in the original Key.
Haydn sometimes, and Mozart and Beethoven
constantly, followed this Second Subject by a
Third one, in the same Key— as in the Over
ture to 'Figaro,' and many similar Movements:
but this plan introduced no new principle, and
•was, in fact, no more than a re-assertion of the
leading idea — that of introducing a new source
of interest at a critical turn of the Movement.
With the working of these Subjects we have, at
present, no concern. It remains only to show
the various forms they assumed in the most
important styles of Composition.
In the Overture, the First Subject, if un
trammelled by any dramatic or descriptive pur
pose, is usually a spirited one ; and the Second,
of a more sustained or cantabile character. In
SUBJECT.
the great majority of cases, both Subjects are
complete in themselves ; but the first is gener
ally a comparatively short one, while the second
sometimes presents the form of a fully- developed
Air, consisting of two or even more distinct
Strains, as in the Overtures to ' Euryanthe ' and
' Ruy Bias.' Very frequently the first forte in
troduces an independent Theme in the primary
Key, as in 'Der Freischutz' and 'A Midsummer
Night's Dream.' Classical Overtures almost al
ways start with a strongly marked Theme in
Simple Common Time. There is, indeed, no law
concerning this point : but the custom is so
general, that one of Mendelssohn's most active
coadjutors at the Gewandhaus condemned the
identity of Time (6-4) in 'The Naiades' and
'The Ruler of the Spirits,' as a self-evident
plagiarism on the part of Sterndale Bennett, not
withstanding the entirely different character of
the two works. Yet the Overture to 'Egmont'
is in 3-4 time.
The First Subject of the Symphony is open to
greater variety of character than that of the
Overture ; is frequently in 3-4 or 6-8 Time, or
even in 9-8, as in Spohr's 'Die AVeihe der Tone' ;
and is often of considerable length and extended
development, as in Mendelssohn's ' Scotch Sym
phony.' This last characteristic, however, is by
no means a constant one : witness the First Sub
ject of Beethoven's C minor Symphony, which
consists of four notes only. As a general rule,
the Second Subject of the Symphony is less ex
tended in form than that of the Overture ; and it
may be predicated, with almost absolute certainty,
that the less extended the Theme, the more com
pletely and ingeniously will it be 'worked,' and
lice versa.
The Subjects of the Sonata differ from those
of the Symphony chiefly in their adaptation to
the distinctive character of the Instrument or
Instruments for which they are written; and
the same may be said, within certain limits, of
those of the Concerto, which however are almost
always of greater extension and completeness
than those of any other form of Composition, and
are treated in a manner peculiar to themselves,
and differing very materially, in certain par
ticulars, from the plan pursued in most other
Movements — as, for instance, in the almost
epigrammatic terseness with which all the Sub
jects of the First Movement were interwoven,
in the opening Tutti, into an epitome of the
whole.
But in the important points of completeness
and extension, all these Motivi yield to those of the
Rondo, the First Subject of which forms a quite
independent section of the Movement, and often
closes with a definite and well-marked Cadence
before the introduction of the first Modulation,
as in the Rondo of Beethoven's ' Sonata Pas
torale ' (op. 29) ; that of the Sonata in C major
(op. 53) ; that of Mozart's Sonata d 4 mains, in
C major ; and numerous other instances. This
Subject is rarely presented in any other than its
original form in the primitive Key ; though, in
certain exceptional cases — such as Weber's Rondo
SUBJECT.
for PF. in Eb — it is very elaborately developed.
The Second Subject — which almost always makes
its first appearance in the Key of the Dominant,
or Relative Major, to re-appear, after the last
Reprise, in the primitive Key — is, in most cases,
little less complete and extended than the First,
though its construction is generally less homo
geneous, consisting, frequently, of two, three, or
even more distinct members, marked by consider
able diversity of figure and phrasing, as in
Weber's Rondo in Eb, already cited. This Sub
ject, like the First, is seldom broken up to any
great extent, or very completely 'worked,' though,
as we have seen, it is again employed, in its en
tirety, in a transposed form. The Third Subject
is usually of a less extended character than the
First and Second; or, if equally complete and
continuous, is at least more easily broken up into
fragmentary phrases, and therefore more capable
of effective working. The Third Subject of
Beethoven's 'Sonate Pathe"tique' (Op. 13), is al
most fugal in character, and rendered intensely
interesting by its fine contrapuntal treatment,
though destined nevermore to re-appear, after
the second reprise of the principal Theme. In
deed, each of the three Subjects of the typical
Rondo is nearly always so designed as to form
the basis of an independent section of the Move
ment ; • and, though the First must necessarily
appear three, or even four times, in the original
Key, and the Second twice, in different Keys,
the Third, even when elaborately worked in its
own section, is very seldom heard again in a
later one. In the Rondo of Beethoven's Sonata,
Op. 26, the Third Subject is as complete in
itself, and as little dependent on the rest of the
Movement, as the Second, or the First ; and is
summarily dismissed after its first plain statement.
But there are, of course, exceptions to this mode
of proceeding. In the Rondo of the Sonata in C
Major, Op. 53, all the Subjects, including even
the First, are worked with an ingenuity quite
equal to that displayed in the First Movement
of the work. Still, these Subjects all differ en
tirely, both in form and character, from those
employed in the First Movement ; and this will
always be found to be the case in the Rondos of
the great Classical Composers.
There remains yet another class of Subjects
to which we have as yet made no allusion, but
which, nevertheless, plays a very important
part in the ceconomy of Musical Composition.
We allude to the Subjects of Dramatic Move
ments, both Vocal and Instrumental. It is
obvious, that in Subjects of this kind the most
important element is the peculiar form of dramatic
expression necessary for each individual Theme.
And, because the varieties of dramatic expression
are practically innumerable, it is impossible to
fix any limit to the varieties of form into which
such Subjects may be consistently cast. At certain
epochs in the history of the Lyric Drama, con
sistency has undoubtedly been violated, and
legitimate artistic progress seriously hindered,
by contracted views on this point. In the days
of Hasse, for instance, a persistent determination
VOL. III. PT. 6.
SUBSIDIARY.
753
to cast all Melodies, of whatever character, into
the same stereotyped form, led to the petrifaction
of all natural expression in the most unnatural
of all mechanical contrivances — the so-called ' Con
cert-Opera.' Against this perversion of dramatic
truth all true Artists conscientiously rebelled.
Gluck, with a larger Orchestra and stronger
Chorus at command, returned to the principles
set forth by Peri and Caccini in the year 1600.
Mozart invented Subjects, faultlessly propor
tioned, yet always exactly suited to the character
of the dramatic situation, and the peculiar form
of passion needed for its expression. These Sub
jects he wrought into Movements, the symmetry
of which equalled that of his most finished Con
certos and Symphonies, while their freedom of
development, and elaborate construction, not
only interposed no hindrance to the most perfect
scenic propriety, but, on the contrary, carried
on the Action of the Drama with a power
which has long been the despair of his most
ambitious imitators. Moreover, in his greatest
work, ' II Don Giovanni/ he used the peculiar
form of Subject now known as the ' Leading-
Theme'1 with unapproachable effect; entrusting
to it the responsibility of bringing out the point
of deepest interest in the Drama — a duty which
it performs with a success too well known to
need even a passing comment. In 'Der Frei-
schutz/ Weber followed up this idea with great
effect; inventing, among other striking Subjects,
two constantly-recurring Themes, which, applied
to the Heroine of the piece and the Daemon,
invest the Scenes in which they appear with
special interest.
At the present moment, the popularity of the
'Leading Theme' exceeds that of any other kind
of Subject ; while the danger of relapsing into
the dead forms of the School of Hasse has ap
parently reached its zero. But, the constructive
power of Mozart, as exhibited in his wonderful
Finales, still sets emulation at defiance.
The different forms of Subject thus rapidly
touched upon, constitute but a very small pro
portion of those in actual use ; but we trust
that we have said enough to enable the Student
to judge for himself as to the characteristics of
any others with which he may meet, during the
course of his researches, and the more so, since
many Subjects of importance are described in the
articles on the special forms of Composition to
which they belong. [W.S.R.]
SUBMEDIANT. The sixth note of the scale
rising upwards. The note next above the domi
nant, as A in the key of C. The submediant of
any major scale is chiefly brought into prominence
as the tonic of its relative minor. [C.H.H.P.]
SUBSIDIARY, in a symphonic work, is a
theme of inferior importance, not strictly form
ing part of either first or second subject, bat
subordinate to one or the other. The spaces
between the two subjects, which in the early days
before Beethoven were filled tip by ' padding ' in
the shape of formal passages and modulations,
i See LEIT MOTIF.
3 C
754
SUBSIDIARY.
are now, in obedience to his admirable practice,
occupied by distinct ideas, usually of small scope,
but of definite purport. [See vol. i. p. 2036.] The
' Eroica ' Symphony affords early and striking
examples of subsidiary subjects in various posi
tions. Thus, on the usual dominant passage
preceding the 2nd subject appears the plaintive
melody : —
k±.J*
which becomes of so much importance in the
2nd part. And the same title belongs also to the
fresh subject which appears transiently during
the ' working-out ' with so much effect : —
Equally noticeable is the phrase in a similar
situation in the 4th Symphony,
,
while the melody which Schubert interpolated
as an afterthought in the Scherzo of his great
C major Symphony is too well known to require
quotation.
These two last however are not worked, and
can therefore hardly be classed as ' themes,' but
are more of the nature of f episodes.'
In some cases a Subsidiary acquires so much
importance in the working out as to rank as a
third subject. The Italian Symphony of Men
delssohn supplies a type of this. The subject —
which appears shortly after the double bar in the
ist movement, though properly speaking merely
a Subsidiary, is so insisted upon and elaborated
in the working-out and coda as to rival the ist
subject itself in importance.
As a notable exception to the rule that a Sub
sidiary is usually very short, we may mention
that in the Rondo Finale of Raff's PF. Quartet
in G (op. 202) there occurs a subordinate theme
over 60 bars in length. [F.C.]
SUCCENTOR, t. e. Sub-cantor. A cathedral
officer, deputy to the Praecentor. His duty is to
supply his principal's place during absence, in
the regulation of the service, and other duties of
the Prsecentor. [G.]
SUSSMAYER.
SUCCES D'ESTIME. A success which is
due to the sympathy of friends, or the desire to
do justice to a meritorious composer, or to the
hidden inner merits of a work, and not due to
those qualities which appear on the surface and
compel the applause of the public. [G.]
SUCHER, JOSEF, born at Dobor, Eisenburg,
Hungary, Nov. 23, 1844, was brought up in the
Lowenburg Convict at Vienna, as a chorister in
the Hofkapelle, which he joined on the same
day with Hans Richter, the conductor. On com
pleting his course at the Convict he began to
study law, but soon threw it aside, worked at
counterpoint with Sechter, and adopted music
as his profession. Beginning as sub-conductor
of a Singing Society in Vienna, he advanced to
be ' Repetitor ' of the solo singers at the Imperial
Court Opera, and conductor at the Comic Opera,
and in 1876 went to Leipzig as conductor of the
City Theatre. In the following year he married
Fraulein Rosa Hasselbeck, the then prima donna
of the same house. She belongs to Velburg in
the Palatinate, and is the daughter of one musi
cian and the niece of another. Her first en
gagement was at Troves. Thence she went to
Konigsberg and thence to Berlin and Danzig,
where she was engaged by her future husband
for Leipzig. From Leipzig in 1879 husband and
wife went to Hamburg, where they are settled aa
conductor and prima donna. They visited Eng
land ini882,andMme.Sucher proved her eminent
qualities both as a singer and an actress by the
extraordinary range of parts in which she ap
peared at the German opera at Drury Lane —
Euryanthe; Senta; Elisabeth; Elsa; and Isolde.
Her husband produced a ' Scene ' or Cantata en
titled ' Waldfraulein ' (' The wood maiden ') for
soli, chorus, and orchestra, at the Richter Concert
of June 5. Composition is no novelty to Heir
Sucher ; even in his chorister days we hear of
songs, masses, cantatas, and overtures, one of
which, to an opera called 'Use,' was brought
forward at a concert in Vienna in 1873. One
of his best-known published works is a Lieder-
cyclus entitled 'Ruheort.' [G.]
SUSSMAYER,1 FRANZ XAVEB, composer and
Capellmeister, born 1766 at Steyer in Upper
Austria, and educated at the monastery of
Kremsmunster, where he attempted composition
in several branches. At Vienna he had instruc
tion from Salieri and Mozart. With the latter
he formed the closest attachment, becoming,
to use Seyfried's expression, 'the inseparable
companion of the immortal Amphion.' Jahn
details the work he did for the ' Clemenza di
Tito' on its production at Prague, whither he
accompanied Mozart. Siissmayer was at his
bed-side the evening before Mozart's death,
while the latter tried to give him the necessary
instructions for completing his Requiem, a task
for which he was peculiarly fitted by his knack
of imitating Mozart's handwriting. Jahn has
stated in detail (ii. 172) how much of that work
is in all probability Siissmayer's. [See vol. ii.
p. 402 a.]
i He signs himself on a symphony SIESSMATB.
SUSSMAYER.
As a composer Siissmayers name (as 'pupil
of Salieri and Mozart ' ) first appears at Schika-
neder's Theatre, where his opera, ' Moses,' was
brought _ out May 4, 1792, revived in 1796,
and again in concert-form in 1800. This was
followed by ' L'Incanto superato,' a ' musico-
romantic fable' (Burgtheater, 1793), and by
' Der Spiegel von Arkadien ' (Schikaneder's
Theatre, 1794), libretto by Schikaneder, which
became a favourite, and was eulogised by the
'Wiener Zeitung.' He became in 1794 com
poser, and in 1795 Capellmeister, to the
Karnthnerthor Court Theatre, where he pro
duced successively 'Die edle Kache' (1795),
'Die Freiwilligen ' (1796), 'Der Wildfang'
(1797), 'Der Marktschreier ' and ' Soliman der
Zweite' (1799), 'Gulnare' (1800), and 'Phasma'
(1801). His patriotic cantata, 'Der Retter in
Gefahr,' was performed at an entertainment to
the Vienna volunteers in the large Eedouten-
saal at a time of threatened war (1796), and
several times repeated in the same building,
and by the Tonkunstler Societat. Siissmayer
also composed two operas for Prague. Several
of the above works were printed, some only in
part, while others — masses, and smaller church-
works, instrumental pieces, etc. — exist only in
MS. Though wanting in depth and originality
his works are melodious, and have a certain
popular character peculiar to himself. He might
perhaps have risen to a higher flight had he not
been overtaken by death after a long illness,
Sept. 17, 1803. Prince Esterhazy bought his
entire MSS. from his widow. [C. F. P.]
SUITE. In the period between the latter
part of the i6th and the beginning of the i8th
century the most conspicuous feature of univer
sal instrumental music is the profusion of dance
tunes. All the most civilised nations of that
time took equal pleasure in them ; and partly
owing to the itinerant musicians who traversed
divers countries, and partly to the wars which
brought representatives of different nationalities
into frequent contact, both friendly and hostile,
the various characteristic types were spread from
one land to another, were adopted universally by
composers, irrespective of nationality, and were
so acclimatised as to become in many cases as
characteristic of and as popular in the countries of
their adoption as in that of their origin. This
is sufficiently illustrated in Morley's well-known
' Plain and Easy Introduction to Practical Mu
sic,' printed in 1597. For when he comes to
treat of dance-music, the first things he takes
notice of are Pavans and Galliards, Almanes and
Branles ; of which the first two are of Italian
origin, the third probably Suabian, and the last
French. The first two were not only in common
use for dancing purposes in Queen Elizabeth's
time, but were adopted by the great composers
of the day and a little later as a favourite basis
for instrumental pieces, which were intended as
much for private enjoyment as music as for
accompaniments to dances ; and they are found
plentifully scattered in such collections as 'Queen
Elizabeth's Virginal Book' and the 'Parthenia/
SUITE.
755
among sets of variations, preludes, and fantasias.
A large proportion of such dances were naturally
taken singly, but composers early perceived the
advantage of contrasting one with another. Thus
Morley, in the same part of the Avork just men
tioned, speaks of the desirableness of alternating
Pavans and Galliards; since the first was 'a
kind of staid musick ordained for grave dancing,'
and the latter ' a lighter and more stirring kind
of dancing ' ; and he further describes more ob
scurely the contrast arising from the 4-time
and 3-time which subsists between them. The
following examples are the first halves of a
'Pavana' and a 'Galiardo' by Byrd, which fairly
illustrate Morley's description : —
Pavana.
Im 122
| e^ .•- - --| -
*J IS— 22 tf«
V-L/ -— .
TW^S* P*j
J -S-
^J-^-+
f— —
J— J J7l rjfl-
f-*^
-i j 5
5* §• fL
^J. £D C
{2^* ** «
: J : . . 1 .
• • * ^ -
" • J
••^1
m J- '-
r^J • •
* • 4 1
f- - 0
H • A
" — . *
_J
> r
J
^ ^
* •
23
^
i P-»-
Galiardo.
T-Z»-
»=H
1 h J 1
.
J - *- = ^ ~
- >H- . 1
aJ
E±E± • — s
a- .•
r~ ~r r r
-^ •JJJiJSii -
I- J — 2 — JL_
— F — b ' — r
— FH
M 10 1-
— H
i
N 1
J
1
• •
22
TT _ • _
•
r-
r i
1u§ • i A A
T^- •
j
t 1
H > "^WJ" 1
'1 J gj jo.- r J
V 1 &»—. & & r.
— ?5 —
• — r
s^— d
•-. I
3C2
756
SUITE.
Spitta, in his Lite of Bach (i. 68 1), mentions the
same contrast as popular in Germany a little
later, and refers to the publication of thirty
Paduans and Gaillards by Johann Ghro of Dres
den in 1604. In such a manner originated the
idea of joining different dance-tunes together to
make an artistic balance and contrast, and in
this lies the germ of the Suite ; in which, by
selecting dances of various nationalities, and dis
posing them in the order which displayed their
relative bearings on one another to the best ad
vantage, composers established the first secular
instrumental cyclic art-form.
It is not possible, for want of materials, to
trace fully the process of selection. The Pavans
and Galliards dropped out of fashion very early,
and Allemandes and Courantes came in, and
soon became a sort of established nucleus, to
which was sometimes appended a Sarabande, or
even several other dance movements, and a Pre
lude. Indeed, when the principle of grouping
movements together was once accepted, the specu
lations of composers in that line seem to have
been only limited by their knowledge of dance-
forms. It was in fact by experimenting with
various methods of grouping that the most
satisfactory succession was arrived at ; and thus
many of the earlier suites contain a greater pro
fusion and variety than is found in those of the
maturer period. In Purcell's suites, for instance,
which date from the last 10 or 20 years of the
1 7th century, besides the Allemande and Cou-
rante, which occupy just the very position in
which they are found in the Suites of Bach and
Handel ; in one case the group also comprises a
Sarabande, Cebell, Minuet, Riggadoon, Intrade,
and March ; while another contains a Trumpet
tune and a Chacone, and another a Hornpipe.
One of the most curious features in them is the
absence of the Jig, which in the mature suite-
form was the only one admitted of English origin.
The opening with a Prelude is almost invariable ;
and this is not astonishing, since this kind of
movement (which can hardly be described as a
'form') was as familiar as the dances, from
having been ' so often attempted by the early
instrumental composers, such as Byrd, Orlando
Gibbons, Bull, and Blow among Englishmen.
The order of four movements which served as
the nucleus in the large proportion of suites
of the mature period is also occasionally, by
accident, found very early; as for instance in
one of the Suites of Froberger, which Nottebohm
says was written in 1649 ; and another by Lully,
which was probably written early in the second
half of the same century.
These groups had however as yet no uniform
distinctive title. In England, in common with
other combinations of divisions or movements,
they were generally called Lessons, or Suites of
Lessons, and continued to be so called till after
Handel's time. In Italy similar groups were
called Senate da Camera ; in Germany they were
called Parties or Partitas, as in the Clavier-
iibung of Kuhnau published in 1689, and the set
of six by Johann Krieger published in 1697; and
SUITE.
in France they were as yet commonly known as
Ordres. Thus the fact evidently existed uni
versally for some time before the name by which
it is now known came into general use.
The composers of different countries illustrated
in different degrees the tendency towards con
solidation which is inevitable in an art-form.
The steps taken by the Italians appear to be
particularly important as illustrating the distinct
tendencies of the Suite and the Sonata. Corelli's
earlier Senate da Camera are scarcely distinguish
able from the suite type, as they consist of a
string of dance-tunes preceded by a prelude.
The later sonatas or solos of his Opera Quinta,
however, represent different types. Some still
consist of dance tunes, but many also show a
fair proportion of movements of more abstract
nature ; and in several the dance element is, in
name at least, quite absent. These are indeed a
sort of combination of the church and chamber
sonata into a secular form, adding a canzona or
free fugal movement in the place of the alle-
mande, and transmuting the other dance types
into movements with general qualities analogous
to the earlier sonatas. Where this abstract
character prevailed, the type approached more
distinctly to that of the modern sonata, and
where the uniformity of a dance rhythm pre
vailed throughout, it approached more nearly
to the suite type. In these cases the arrange
ment had already ceased to be a mere crude
experiment in antithesis, such as the early
balance of galliard and pavan, and attained to
the dignity of a complete art-form. With the
Italians the remarkable distinction of their 1vioh'n
school led to the greater cultivation of the
Violin Sonata, which though retaining a few
dance -forms, differed markedly in their distribu
tion, and even in the structure of the movements.
In both France and Germany, more attention
seems to have been paid to the clavier, and with
it to the suite form. The former country very
early showed many proofs of appreciation of its
principles; as an instance, the suite by Lulli
in E minor, mentioned above, has the complete
series of allemande, sarabande, courante, minuet,
and gigue. But a little later, theatrical influences
seem to have come into play, and Eameau and
Couperin, though in many cases adopting the
same nucleus to start with, added to it a pro
fusion of rondeaus and other short movements
called by various eccentric names. In one of
Couperin's Ordres the number of little pieces
amounts to no less than twenty-three; and in
such a case it is clear that a sense of form or
complete balance in the whole can hardly have
been even aimed at. The movements are strung
together in the same key, according to the re
cognised rule, as a series of agreeable ballet
pieces, and the titles point to their belonging to
quite a different order of art from that illustrated
by the suite in its maturity. In fact their kin
ship must be attributed mainly to the order of
programme music. Thus in the tenth Ordre of
Couperin, the first number is called ' La Triom-
i See SONATA, vol. iii. p. 559.
SUITE.
phante' and also 'Bruit de Guerre.' In the
eleventh Ordre a series of pieces represents ' Les
Fastes de la grande et ancienne Mxnxstrxndxsx,'
in five acts, the fourth of which is 'Les Invalides,'
etc., in which the right hand is made to repre
sent 'Les DisloqueV and the left 'Les Boiteux,'
and the last is ' Desordre et d^route de toute la
troupe : cause's par les Yvrognes, les Singes, et
les Ours.'
In Germany, composers kept their faces more
steadfastly set in the direction of purer art-form,
and the prevalence of uniformity in their distri
bution of movements soon became remarkable.
Kuhnau's examples have been already referred to,
and an example given in Pauer's Alte Clavier
Music illustrates the usual order absolutely.
Spitta mentions that the famous organist Buxte-
hude made a complete suite out of variations on
the choral 'Auf meinem lieben Gott' in the form
of sarabande, courante and gigue. Twelve sets of
1 Pieces de Clavecin ' by Mattheson, which were
published in London as early as 1714, two years
before Couperin's first set, are remarkably regu
lar. The first, in D minor, has a prelude, alle-
mande and double, courante and double, sara
bande and gigue. The second begins with a
toccatina, the fifth with a fantasia, the ninth with
a 'Boutade,' and the tenth with a 'Symphonic,'
but in other respects most of them follow the
same outlines of general distribution. The ' Six
Suits of Lessons ' of the Dutchman Johann
Loeillet, published a little earlier still, are equally
precise. From these facts it is quite clear that
by the beginning of the iSth century certain
definite principles of grouping the movements
were generally known and accepted ; and that
a nucleus, consisting of allemande, courante,
sarabande, and gigue, had become the accepted
type of the art-form.
The differences between the structure of suite
movements and sonata movements have already
been traced in the article SONATA. It remains
here only to summarise, with more special re
ference to the suite. While sonata movements
constantly increased in complexity, suite move
ments remained almost stationary. They were
based upon the persistence of the uniform type
of a dance rhythm, throughout the whole of each
several movement. Hence the ground principles
of subject in sonata and suite are altogether
different. In the former the subjects are con
crete, and stand out in a marked manner both in
contrast to one another and to their immediate
context ; and it is a vital point in the form
that they shall be fully and clearly recapitulated.
In the suite, on the other hand, the subject
does not stand out at all prominently from its
context, but is only a well-marked presentation
of the type of motion and rhythm which is to
prevail throughout the movement. To this there
is no contrasting subject or episode, and definite
recapitulation is no part of the scheme at all.
In a few cases — which must be regarded as ac
cidents in relation to the logical principles of the
form — the opening bars happen to be sufficiently
marked to have something of the character of a
SUITE.
757
sonata subject; and in such cases it may also
happen that they are repeated with sufficient
simplicity to have the effect of recapitulation.
But nevertheless it must be maintained that this
is not part of the principle of construction. And
with reference to this point it is well to remember
that composers did not attain the ultimate dis
tinct outlines of sonata and suite with a definite
purpose and plan before them ; but that in
working with particular materials they were led
almost unconsciously to differentiate the two forms.
The plan is found to exist when the work is done;
but it was not theoretically propounded and then
worked up to. It is not therefore a matter for
surprise that in early times some points in the
development of abstract form of the sonata kind
were worked out in dance movements of the
suite type, and applied and extended afterwards
in works which had more distinctly the sonata
character. Nevertheless the sonata is not an
outgrowth from the suite ; but, inasmuch as
both were descended from a kindred stock, before
the distinctions had become well defined, it is
natural that many works should have continued
to exhibit -suggestions and traits of both sides
promiscuously. On the whole however it is re
markable how soon the distinct types came to be
generally maintained ; and from the number of
instances which conform, the system can be fairly
deduced.
The most marked external point is the uni
formity of key. In Corelli's earlier Senate da
Camera, which in general are decided suites, the
one exception which marks a sonata tendency is
that the slow dance is often in a different key from
the rest of the movements. In later suites of all
sorts the uniformity of key throughout is almost
universal. In the whole of Bach's the only
exceptions are the second minuet of the fourth
English Suite, and the second gavotte in that
known as the 'Overture in French Style.'1 Hence
the contrast is purely one of character between
the several movements ; and this is emphasised
by the absence of any marked contrast of key or
subject in the movements themselves. They are
almost invariably constructed upon the simple
principle of balanced halves, each representing
the same material in different phases ; and each
strengthened by repetition. The first half sets
out from the tonic key, and without any marked
pause or division modulates so as to settle into
the key of the dominant or relative major, and
closes in that key. The second half begins afresh
from that point, and proceeding in most cases by
way of the key of the subdominant, settles well
back again into the original key and concludes.
The only break therefore is in the middle ; and
the two halves are made purposely to balance
one another, as far as may be, without definite
recapitulation. In a few movements, such espe
cially as sarabandes and intermezzi, the second
half is somewhat extended to admit of a little
development and free modulation, but the general
principles in the average number of cases are
the same, namely to diffuse the character of the
1 • Ouverture & la mauiere Francaise.'
758
SUITE.
principal figures and features throughout, rather
than to concentrate the interest of the subject
in definite parts of the movement. In order, how
ever, to strengthen the effect of balance between
the two halves, certain devices are common and
characteristic, especially with regard to the
beginnings and endings of each half. Thus
though composers do not seem to have aimed
at recapitulation, there is frequently a clear
relation between the opening bars of each half.
This often amounts to no more than a subtle
equivalence in the distribution of the group of
rhythms in the bar, or a very loose transcript
of its melodic features. But in some cases,
most especially in Bach, the opening bars of
the latter half present a free inversion of the
beginning of the first half, or a sort of free
shuffling of the parts approximating to double
counterpoint. The first mode is clearly illustrated
by the Courante of the 3rd Partita in A minor
as follows :
1st half.
The Allemande of the 4th Suite Anglaise sup
plies a remarkable example of free inversion of
figures and parts at the same time.
1st half.
2nd half. S i
The other point, of even more common occur
rence, is the correspondence of the ends of each
half, which prevails particularly in allemandes,
courantes and gigues. A very fine and full ex
ample is supplied by the Allemande of Bach's
1st Suite Anglaise ; the Courante of his 2nd
Suite Franfaise supplies another of some length;
and among works of other composers the Alle
mande of Lully's Suite in E minor, the Courante
of Mattheson's Suite no. 5 in C minor, the Cou
rante of Handel's 4th Suite, the Gigue of his
8th Suite, and most of his Allemandes, are in-
SUITE.
stances to the point. In the particular manner
of the suite movements both these devices are
exceedingly effective as emphasising the balance
of halves, and in the finest movements the balance
of material and modulation is carefully distributed
for the same end. Thus much of form applies
more or less to all the movements which are based
on dance rhythms, or developed on that principle.
Each of the movements has also severally dis
tinct characteristics, upon which the form of the
suite as a whole is mainly based. For the better
understanding of this it will be best to take the
group which forms the average nucleus or so-called
canon of the Suite. In the severest simplicity of
the form the Allemande comes first, as in all
Bach's French Suites, in some of Couperin's, and
many by earlier composers. The origin of the
movement is obscure, and it is maintained that it
is not based upon any dance, since the Allemande
of Suabian origin, said to be the only dance-form
of that name known, is quite distinct from it.
However that may be, its constitution, which
is most important, consists mainly of moder
ately slow 4-time, with regular smooth motion
— most frequently of semiquavers — distributed
in a figurate manner between the various parts,
and its character has been generally .regarded
as appropriately quiet and sober ; which Mat-
theson described as the ' Ruhe des Anfangs.'
To this the Courante, which almost invariably
follows it in the mature suite, is supposed and
intended to supply a contrast, but it cannot ba
maintained that it always does so successfully,
The character of this movement varies consider
ably, owing chiefly to the fact that there are two
decidedly distinct forms derived from different
sources. The one of Italian origin which is found
most frequently in Corelli's Sonatas, in most of
Handel's, in some but not all of Purcell's Suites,
and in Bach's 5th and 6th French Suites, and
5th Partita, is in 3-4 time, of quick, light, and
direct movement, full of rapid passages of simple
character, with simple rhythm, and free from
complication. This in general supplies in an ob
vious sense a fair contrast to the Allemande. The
other Courante, of French origin, is nominally
in 3-2 time, but its characteristic is a peculiar
intermixture of 3-2 and 6-4, which is supposed
to produce a stronger antithesis to the smooth
motion of the Allemande. In the original dance
it is said that this characteristic was chiefly con
fined to the last bars of each half, but in mature
suite movements it was elaborately worked into
the body of the movement with very curious effect.
The quality is shown as early as Kuhnau, but
more frequently in Couperin's Suites, from whom
it is said Bach adopted it. The following example
from Couperin's 3rd Suite is characteristic.
SUITE.
SUITE.
759
etc.
r
It is possible that Bach adopted this form as
affording opportunities for rhythmic experiments;
he certainly carried it to great lengths, such as
giving the right hand a passage in 3-2 and the
1 /*( « £~ "^ *^
lett in 0-4 — •
~1±
but the result is not on the whole very success
ful. In most cases the French Courantes are the
least interesting movement of his Suites, and
as contrasts to the Allemande do not compare
favourably with the Italian Courante. As an
element of contrast the crossing of the time is
rather theoretical than real, and the necessity of
keeping the time moderate in order to make
it intelligible brings the strong beats and the
average quickness of the shortest notes, as well
as the full spread of the bar too near to those
of the Allemande ; and in the general effect of
the Suite these externals tell more strongly than
the abstract restlessness of crossing rhythms.
It is possible however that the French Courante
has one advantage over the Italian ; that inas
much as the latter has more stability in itself, it
calls less for a succeeding movement, and presents
less perfectly the aspect of a link in the chain
than of a movement which might as well stand
alone. There is a slight touch of uneasiness
about the French Courante which as a step
towards the Sarabande is very appropriate. In
this latter movement, which is of Spanish or
possibly Moorish origin, the rhythmic principle
is very pronounced, and at the same time simple.
Its external aspect is chiefly the strong emphasis
on the second beat of a bar of three in slow time,
as is clearly illustrated in Handel's Sarabande
in the G minor Suite, in his 'Lascia ch'io pianga,'
and in the Sarabande of Bach's F major Suite
Anglaise. This is an obvious source of contrast
with both the preceding members of the suite,
since in both Allemande and Courante there is no
pronounced and persistent rhythm, and the pace,
though not necessarily quick, scarcely ever comes
within the range of motion or style characteristic
of definitely slow movements. There is also a
further and equally important element of contrast.
The first two numbers are characterised in a con
siderable proportion of instances by a similar
free motion of parts. The process of carrying
on the figures is sometimes knit by a kind of
free imitation, but however desirable it may be
theoretically to regard them so, they cannot
fairly be described as movements of imitation
(Nachakmungsatze). The process is rather that
of free figuration of two or three parts, giving in
general a contrapuntal effect to the whole. In
the Sarabande the peculiar rhythmic character
puts both systematic imitation and regular con
trapuntal motion equally out of the question.
Consequently as a rule a more decidedly har
monic style obtains ; the chords are fuller, and
move more simultaneously as blocks of harmony.
The character of the finest examples is necessarily
very pliable, and varies between free melody
with Dimple accompanying harmony, such as
those in Bach's Suites Anglaises in F and D
minor, Handel's Suites in G minor and E minor;
examples in which the prominent melodic features
are distributed successively without regularity
between the parts, as in those in the Suites
Anglaises in G minor and A minor, the Suite
Fran9aise in B minor, the Partita in Bb, and
several of Couperin's ; and a few examples in
which a figure or characteristic mode of motion
is made to prevail almost throughout, as in the
Suite Franpaise in Eb. The general effect of the
sarabandes is noble and serious, and the music
is more concentrated than in any other member
of the group of movements. It is thus in various
respects the central point of the suite — in posi
tion; in musical interest and unique quality; and
in the fact, as observed and curiously commented
on by Nottebohm, that the preceding movements
generally tend to solidity and the succeeding
movements to lightness and gaiety. The order
is in this respect somewhat similar to that of
average sonatas, and seems to be the art-expo
sition of the same ideas of form from the point
of view of the musical sense, though differently
carried out as far as the actual manner and
material of the movements are concerned.
In the most concise examples of the Suite the
Sarabande is followed by the final Gigue ; but it
is so common with all the most notable writers
of suites to interpolate other movements, that
it may be well to notice them first. These ap
pear to have been called by the older writers
Galanterien, and more lately Intermezzi ; and
seem to have been regarded as a sort of concession
to popular taste. But in any way they answer
the purposes of form exceedingly well. A very
great variety of dances is introduced at this
point. The moat familiar are the Gavottes,
Bourrees, Minuets, and Passepieds. But besides
these the most distinguished writers introduced
Loures, Polonaises, movements called Arias, and
other less familiar forms. Their character on
the average is especially light and simple, and in
the dance numbers it is remarkable that they
always preserve their dance character more
decidedly and obviously than any other mem
ber of the group. It is not possible to describe
them all in detail, as they are too numerous, but
their aspect in the group is for the most part
similar, and is analogous to that of the Scherzo
' C*
or Minuet and Trio in the modern sonata. They
evidently strengthen the balance on either side
of the sarabande both in quality and amount.
"60
SUITE.
SUITE.
In many cases there is a considerable group of
them, and in these cases it is that the aria is
sometimes introduced. This movement has little
connection with the modern piece of the same
name, as it is generally a short movement in
the same balanced form as the other movements,
but free from the dance basis and rule of time.
It is generally moderately slow, and sometimes
consistently melodious, as in Mattheson's Suite
in A ; but often it is little more than a string of
figures, without even melody of much importance.
The group of Intermezzi is generally contrasted
with the Sarabande and the C4igue either by a
square time or by the interchange of moderate
movement, such as that of the Minuet ; and the
conciseness and distinctness of the type is always
sufficient to make the relations on both sides per
fectly clear.
The Gigue which concludes the series is theo
retically, and in most cases actually, of light and
rapid style. It is usually based on some rhyth
mic combination of 3 feet, but even this is not
invariable. The balance is in favour of 1 2-8 time,
but 6-8 is also common ; and 12-16 and 3-8 not un-
frequent, while a few are in some form of common
time, as the slow Gigue in the first French Suite of
Bach, and the remarkable example in his last
Partita in E minor. The old fancy for concluding
a work with a fugue is illustrated by the common
occurrence of fugal treatment in this member
alone of the regular group of the true suite
series. This treatment is met with in all direct
ions ; in Kuhnau, Mattheson, Handel, Couperin,
as well as Bach. The method of application is
commonly to begin and carry out a free sort of
fugue in the first half, concluding like the other
movements in the dominant key ; and to take up
the same subject freely ' al rovescio ' or by con
trary motion in the second half, with regular
answer as in a fresh fugetta, and carry it out on
that basis with the usual direction of modulation,
concluding in the original key. Thus the fugal
treatment is an accessory to the usual form of
the suite movement, which is here as regularly
and invariably maintained as in the other
members of the group.
The most important accessory which is com
monly added to this nucleus is the Prelude. It
appears in a variety of forms, and under a great
variety of names. The chief point which is
most obvious in relation to the other movements
is that their characteristic form of nearly equal
halves is systematically avoided ; in fact any
other form seems to have been taken in pre
ference. In many important examples it is the
longest and most elaborate movement of all. In
some it is a sort of rhapsody or irregular group
of arpeggios and other figures based on simple
series of chords. Bach commonly developed it
on the same broad outlines as some of his largest
sonata movements, and the first and last of the
Italian Concerto — that is, the distinct balance-
ing section of clear musical character and full
close at the beginning and end of the movement,
and the long passage of development and modu
lation in the middle, sometimes embracing new-
figures. This is illustrated by the Preludes to the
Suites Anglaises in A minor, G minor, F and E
minor. In other examples the treatment is fugal,
or contains a complete fugue along with other
matter of more rhapsodical cast, as in the Toc
cata of the Partita in E minor ; or yet again
it is in the form of a Fantasia, or of the Over
ture as then understood. The effect is certainly
to add breadth and stability to the group in no
mean degree, and the contrast with the rest of
the movements is in every respect unmistakeable.
This completes the general outline of the Suite in
its finest and most consistently complete form,
as illustrated in Bach's Suites Anglaises, which
must be regarded as the culminating point of the
Suite as an art-form.
In the matter of actual distribution of move
ments there are plenty of examples of experi
ments, even in the time when the usual nucleus
had come to be generally recognised ; in fact
there is hardly any large collection of suites
which does not present some exceptions to the
rules. Bach's departures from the usual outlines
are chiefly in the earliest examples, such as the
Partitas, in one of which he concludes with a
rondo and a caprice. The 'Ouverture a la
maniere Fran9aise,' for Clavier, is in appearance
a Suite, but it is clear that Bach had not only
the Clavier Suite type in his mind in laying out
its plan, but also the freer distribution of num
bers in the so-called French Overture said to
date from Lulli. In this there is no Allemande ;
the Sarabande has Intermezzi on both sides of it,
and it concludes with an ' Echo ' after the Gigue.
The works of his which are now commonly known
as Orchestral Suites must be put in the same
category. For the inference suggested byDehn's
trustworthy observations on the MSS. is that
Bach regarded them as Overtures, and that the
name Suite was added by some one else afterwards.
They depart from the average order of the
Clavier Suite even more conspicuously than the
above-mentioned work. In his later composi
tions for Clavier, as has been already remarked,
he was very strict. Handel's Suites on the other
hand are conspicuous departures from the usual
order. They are in fact for the most part
hybrids, and very few have the genuine suite
character as a whole. The introduction of airs
with variations, and of fugues, in the body of the
work, takes them out of the category of strict
interdependent art forms, and makes them appear
rather as casual strings of movements, which are
often as fit to be taken alone or in different
groups as in the group into which he has thrown
them. Moreover they illustrate somewhat, as
Nottebohm has also observed, the peculiar posi
tion which Handel occupied in art, as not pure
German only, but also as representative of some
of the finest traits of the Italian branch of the
art. The tendency of the Italians after Corelli
was towards the Violin Sonata, a distinct branch
from the original stem, and to this order some of
Handel's Suites tend to approximate. It was
chiefly by thorough Germans that the suite-form
was developed in its austerest simplicity; and
SUITE.
in that condition and in relation to their keyed
instruments it seems that the visual group is the
most satisfactory that has been devised.
It is obvious that the Suite as an art-form is
far more elementary and inexpansive than the
Sonata. In fact it attained its maturity long
before the complete development of the latter
form ; and not a little of the interest which at
taches to it is derived from that and collateral
facts. It was the first instrumental form in
which several movements were combined into a
complete whole. It was the first in which the
ecclesiastical influences which had been so power
ful in all high-class music were completely sup
planted by a secular type of equally high artistic
value. Lastly, it was the highest represent
ative instrumental form of the contrapuntal
period, as the Sonata is the highest of the har
monic period. It was brought to perfection when
the modern sonata was still in its infancy, and
before those ideas of key and of the relations of
harmonies which lie at the root of sonata-form had
become tangible realities to men's minds. In
some respects the complete plan has the aspect
of formalism and rigidity. The uniformity of
key is sometimes taken exception to, and the
sameness of structural principle in each move
ment is also undoubtedly somewhat of a draw
back ; but it must be remembered that the form
is a representative product of a peculiar artistic
period, and devised for a particular keyed in
strument, and for minds as yet unaccustomed
to the varied elaboration of the sonata. The re
sults are remarkable and valuable in a high
degree ; and though this may be chiefly owing
to the exceptional powers of the composers who
made use of the form, it is possible that as a
pattern for the combination of small pieces it
may still be worthy of regard. In fact the com
bination of short lyrical movements such as are
characteristic of modern times has strong points of
analogy with it. Moreover, since it is obviously
possible to introduce modifications of some of the
details which were too rigid in the early scheme
without destroying the general principles of the
form, it seems that genuine and valuable musical
results may still be obtained by grafting charac
teristics of modern treatment and expression
upon the old stock. There already exist several
experiments of this kind by modern composers
of mark ; and the Suites for orchestra, piano
forte, cello, or violin, by Lachner, Raff, Bargiel,
St. Sae'ns, Tschaikowsky, Ries, and Cowen, are
not bv any means among their least successful
efforts. [C.H.H.P.]
SULLIVAN, ARTHUR SEYMOUR, was born in
London, May 13, 1842. His father was a band
master, and chief professor of the clarinet at
Kneller Hall ; he was thus born amongst mu
sic. His first systematic instruction was received
from the Rev. Thomas Helmore, Master of the
Children of the Chapel Royal, which he entered
April 1 2, 1854, and left on the change of his voice,
June 22, 1857. 'His voice was very sweet,'
says Mr. Helmore, ' and his style of singing far
more sympathetic than that of most boys.' While
SULLIVAN.
761
at the Chapel Royal he wrote many anthems and
small pieces. One of them, 'O Israel,' a 'sacred
song,' was published by Novellos in 1855. In
1856 the Mendelssohn Scholarship was brought
into active existence, and in July of that year
Sullivan was elected the first scholar. Without
leaving the Chapel Royal he began to study at
the Royal Academy of Music under Goss and
Sterndale Bennett, and remained there till his
departure for Leipzig in the autumn of 1 858. An
overture ' of considerable merit' is ^mentioned
at this time as having been played at one of the
private concerts of the Academy. At Leipzig he
entered the Conservatorium under Plaidy, Haupt-
mann, Richter, Julius Rietz, and Moscheles, and
remained there in company with Walter Bache,
John F. Barnett, Franklin Taylor, and Carl Rosa,
till the end of 1861. He then returned to London,
bringing with him his music to Shakspeare's
'Tempest,' which was produced at the Crystal
Palace, April 5, 1862, and repeated on the I2th
of the same month, and several times since.
This beautiful composition made a great sensa
tion in musical circles and launched him into
London musical society. Two very graceful
pianoforte pieces, entitled ' Thoughts,' were among
his earliest publications. The arrival of the
Princess of Wales in March 1863, produced a
song, ' Bride from the North,' and a Procession
March and Trio in Eb ; and a song entitled ' I
heard the Nightingale ' was published April 28
of the same year. But his next work of import
ance was a cantata called ' Kenilworth,' words by
the late H. F. Chorley, written for the Birmingham
Festival of 1864, and produced there. It con
tains a very fine duet, for soprano and tenor, to
Shakspeare's words, ' On such a night as this,'
which is far too good to be forgotten. His music
to the ballet of ' L'lle enchante'e' was produced
at Covent Garden, May 16, 1864.
At this date he lost much time over an
opera called 'The Sapphire Necklace,' also by
Mr. Chorley ; the undramatic character of the
libretto of which prevented its representation.
The overture has been frequently heard at the
Crystal Palace and elsewhere, and the music
has been used up in other works. In March
1866 Mr. Sullivan produced a Symphony in E at
the Crystal Palace, which has been often played
subsequently, there and at the Philharmonic, etc.
In the same year he had the misfortune to lose
his father, to whom he was fondly attached,
and he uttered his grief in an overture entitled
' In Memoriam,' which was produced (Oct. 30)
at the Norwich Festival of that year. A con
certo for Cello and orchestra was played by Piatti
at the Crystal Palace on Nov. 24. This was fol
lowed by an overture, ' Marmion,' commissioned
by the Philharmonic Society, and produced by
them June 3, 1867. In the autumn of that year
he accompanied his friend the Editor of this
Dictionary to Vienna, in search of the Schubert
MSS., which have since become so well known.
At the same time his symphony was played at the
Gewandhaus at Leipzig. In 1869 he composed
i Athenaeum, July 21. 1858.
762
SULLIVAN.
a short oratorio on the story of the 'Prodigal
Son,' for the Worcester Festival, where it was
produced (Mr. Sims Reeves taking the prin
cipal part) on Sept. 8. In 1870 he again con
tributed a work to the Birmingham Festival,
the graceful and melodious ' Overture di Ballo '
(in Eb), which, while couched throughout in
dance-rhythms, is constructed in perfectly classical
form, and is one of the most favourite pieces in
the Sydenham repertoire. To continue the list
of his commissioned works : in 1871, in company
with Gounod, Hiller, and Pinsuti, he wrote a
piece for the opening of the 'Annual Inter
national Exhibition' at the Albert Hall, on
May i — a cantata by Tom Taylor called 'On
Shore and Sea,' for solo, chorus, and orchestra.
On the recovery of the Prince of Wales from his
illness, he composed, at the call of the Crystal
Palace Company, a Festival Te Deum, for so
prano solo, orchestra, and chorus, which was
performed there May I, 1872. At this time he
was closely engaged in editing the collection of
'Church Hymns with Tunes' for the Christian
Knowledge Society, for which he wrote 21 original
tunes. In 1873 Mr. Sullivan made a third appear
ance at Birmingham, this time with the leading
feature of the Festival, an oratorio entitled
' The Light of the World,' the words selected
from the Bible by himself. The success of this
very tine work at Birmingham was great, and
it has often since been performed, but the very
solemn treatment naturally adopted in the parts
which relate the sufferings of the Redeemer will
always restrict its performance. Mr. Sullivan
succeeded Sir Michael Costa as conductor of the
Leeds Festival of 1880, and wrote for it 'The Mar
tyr of Antioch,' to words selected from Milman's
play of that name. The work lies between an
oratorio and a cantata, and was enthusiastically
received. Mr. Sullivan has accepted the same
post for the Festival of 1883. — It may here be
said that in 1869 he wrote additional accompani
ments to Handel's ' Jephtha ' for the opening of
Barnby's 'Oratorio Concerts,' Feb. 6.
We will now go back to those works which
have made Mr. Sullivan's name most widely
known, not only in Europe but in Australia and
America — his comic Operettas, and his Songs.
' Cox and Box, a new Triumviretta,' was an
adaptation by Mr. F. C. Burnand of Madison
Morton's well-known farce, made still more comic
by the interpolations, and set by Mr. Sullivan
with a brightness and a drollery which at once
put him in the highest rank as a comic composer.1
It was first heard at Moray Lodge (Mr. Arthur
J. Lewis's) on April 27, 1867, and produced in
public at the Adelphi a fortnight after, on May
II. The vein thus struck was not at first very
rapidly worked. 'The Contrabandista ' (2 acts,
words by Burnand)2 followed at St. George's
Opera House on Dec. 18, 1867, but then there
was a pause. ' Thespis, or the Gods grown old ;
an operatic extravaganza ' by Gilbert (Gaiety,
i See ' Times ' of May 13, 1867.
* This opera was •written, composed, and produced In the extra
ordinarily short space of 16 days.
SULLIVAN.
Dec. 26, 1871), and 'The Zoo, an original musical
folly,' by B. Rowe (St. James's, June 5, 1875),
though full of fun and animation, were neither of
them sufficient to take the public. 'Trial by
Jury, an extravaganza,' — and a very extravagant
one too, — words by W. S. Gilbert, produced at
the Royalty, March 25, 1875, had a great suc
cess, and many representations, owing in part
to the very humorous conception of the character
of the Judge by Mr. Sullivan's brother Frederick.
But none of these can be said to have taken a real
hold on the public. ' The Sorcerer, an original
modern comic opera/ by W. S. Gilbert, which
first established the popularity of its composer,
was a new departure, a piece of larger dimensions
and more substance than any of its predecessors.
It was produced at the Opera Comique, Strand,
Nov. 17, 1877, and ran uninterruptedly for 175
nights. The company formed for this piece by Mr.
Doyly Carte, including that admirable artist Mr.
Grossmith, was maintained in the next, 'H.M.S.
Pinafore,' produced at the same house, May 25,
1878. This not only ran in London for 700 con
secutive nights, but had an extraordinary vogue
in the provinces, and was adopted in the United
States to a degree exceeding all previous record.
To protect their interests there, Mr. Sullivan and
Mr. Gilbert visited the United States in 1879,
and remained for several months. An attempt
to bring out the piece at Berlin as 'Amor an
Bord ' 3 failed, owing to the impossibility of any
thing like political caricature in Germany. But
it was published by Litolff in 1882. The vein
of droll satire on current topics adopted in the two
last pieces has been kept up in ' The Pirates of
Penzance' (April 3, 1880, 350 nights), 'Patience,
an sesthetic opera' (April 25, i88i,4 578 nights),
and 'lolanthe' (Nov. 25, 1882) which is still
running as prosperous a course as any of the
others.5 Such unprecedented recognition speaks
for itself. But it is higher praise to say, with a
leading critic, that ' while Mr. Sullivan's music
is as comic and lively as anything by Offenbach,
it has the extra advantage of being the work of
a cultivated musician, who would scorn to write
ungrammatically even if he could.' We might
add ' vulgarly or coarsely,' which, in spite of all
temptations, our countryman has never done.
' His refinement,' as a writer of our own has well
said, 'is a thousand times more telling than any
coarse utterances.'6 But may we not fairly ask
whether the ability so conspicuous in these
operettas is always to be employed on works
which from their very nature must be even more
fugitive than comedy in general ? Surely the time
has come when so able and experienced a master
of voice, orchestra, and stage effect — master, too,
of so much genuine sentiment — may apply his
gifts to the production of a serious opera on some
subject of abiding human or national interest.
The ' Tempest ' music has never — so far as the
writer is aware — been used in a performance of
3 Arranged for the German stage by Ernst Dohm.
4 On Oct. 10, 1881, the company removed from the Opdra Comique,
to the new ' Savoy Theatre ' in the Strand.
5 232 performances to July 16, 1883.
6 See the whole passage in pp. 306, £07 of this volume.
SULLIVAN.
SULLIVAN.
763
the play ; in fact, since Mr. Macready's time ' The
Tempest' has scarcely ever been put on the
stage. But Mr. Sullivan has written incidental
music for three other of Shakspeare's dramas;
viz. ' The Merchant of Venice,' Prince's Theatre,
Manchester, Sept. 18, 1871 ; 'The Merry Wives
of Windsor,' Gaiety Theatre, Dec. 19, 1874; and
' Henry VIII,' Theatre Royal, Manchester, Aug.
29, 1878. Of these the first is by far the best, and
is an excellent specimen of the merits of its com
poser, in spirit, tunefulness, orchestration, and
irrepressible humour.
Mr. Sullivan's Songs are as well known as his
operettas. They are almost always of a tender
or sentimental cast ; and some of them, such as
'Sweet day so cool, so calm, so bright'; the
'Arabian Love Song,' by Shelley; ' 0 fair dove,
0 fond dove,' by Jean Ingelow ; the Shakspeare
Songs ; and the series — or, as the Germans would
call it, the Liedercyclus — of 'The Window,'
written for the purpose by Tennyson, stand in a
very high rank. None of these, however, have
attained the popularity of others, which, though
slighter than those just named, and more in the
ballad style, have hit the public taste to a re
markable degree. Such are 'Will he come?'
and 'The lost chord' (both by Miss Procter); '0
ma charmante' (V. Hugo); 'The distant shore'
and ' Sweethearts' (both by W. S. Gilbert), etc.
The same tunefulness and appropriateness that
have made his Songs such favourites, also distin
guish his numerous Anthems. Here the excel
lent training of the Chapel Royal shows itself
without disguise, in the easy flow of the voices,
the display of excellent, and even l learned,
counterpoint, when demanded by words or sub
ject, and the frequent examples throughout of
that melodious style and independent treatment
that marks the anthems of the best of the old
England school. His Part-songs, like his An
thems, are flowing and spirited, and always ap
propriate to the words. There are two sets ; one
sacred, dedicated to his friend Franklin Taylor,
and one secular, of which '0 hush thee, my babie'
has long been an established favourite.
His Hymn-tunes are numerous — 47 in all-
and some of them, such as ' Onward, Christian
Soldiers/ have justly become great favourites.
Others, such as 'The strain upraise' and the
arrangement of St. Ann's, to Heber's words 'The
Son of God goes forth to war,' are on a larger
scale, and would do honour to any composer.
If his vocal works have gained Sir Arthur
Sullivan the applause of the public, it is in his
orchestral music that his name will live among
musicians. His music to 'The Tempest' and
'The Merchant of Venice,' his oratorios, his
Overture di Ballo, and, still more, his Symphony
in E unfortunately his only work in this depart
ment—show what remarkable gifts he has for
the orchestra. Form, and symmetry he seems to
possess by instinct ; rhythm and melody clothe
everything he touches ; the music shows not only
sympathetic genius, but sense, judgment, pro
portion, and a complete absence of pedantry and
i See the Festival Te Deum.
pretension ; while the orchestration is distin
guished by a happy and original beauty hardly
surpassed by the greatest masters. Here again
we may express our earnest hope that such
great qualities as these may not pass away
without leaving some enduring monument of
his mature powers, some Symphony or Concerto
added to the permanent repertory of the English
School, now so vigorously reviving.
During the early part of his career Mr. Sullivan
was organist of St. Michael's Church, Chester
Square. After this, in 1867, he undertook the
direction of the music at St. Peter's, Onslow
Gardens, for which many of his anthems were
composed, and where he remained till 1871. He
was musical adviser to the Royal Aquarium Com
pany from its incorporation in July 1874 down
to May 1876, organised the admirable band with
which it started, and himself conducted its per
formances. For the seasons 1878 and 79 he
conducted the Promenade Concerts at Covent
Garden for Messrs. Gatti ; and for those of 75-
76, and 76-77, the Glasgow Festivals. He was
Principal of the National Training School at
South Kensington from 1876 to 1881, when his
engagements compelled him to resign in favour
of Dr. Stainer, and he is now a member of the
Council of the Royal College of Music. He re
ceived the Honorary Degree of Doctor of Music
from the University of Cambridge in 1876, and
Oxford, 1879. In 1878 he acted as British Com
missioner for Music at the International Exhibi
tion at Paris, and was decorated with the Lfyion
dhonneur. He also bears the Order of Saxe-
Coburg and Gotha, and on May 15, 1883, was
knighted by the Queen.
List of Sir Arthur Sullivan's works, with names
of original publishers, and year of publication.
N B —A. & P. = Ashdown & Parry ; B. = Boosey ; C. =
Cramer & Co. ; Ch.= Chappell & Co. ; M. = Metzler &
Co. ; N.=Novello & Co. ; S. L.= Stanley Lucas.
ORATORIOS.
The Prodigal Son. B. 1869. | The Light of the World. C. 1S73.
The Martyr of Antioch. Ch. 1380.
Kenilworth. Ch. 1864.
CANTATAS.
| On Shore and Sea. B. 1871.
SERVICES.
Te Deum. and Domine salvamiTe Deum, Jubilate, and Kyrie
fac (Orch., C). H. Ib72. I (Voices only, D). N. 1866-1872.
ANTHEMS.
0 love the Lord (Full; F). N.
ears
N.
We have heard with our
(Full, a 5 ; G). N. 1865.
0 taste and see (Full; F).
1867.
Rejoice in the Lord. B. 1868.
Sing, O heavens. B. 1868.
0 God, Thou art worthy (Wed
ding; C). N. 1871.
I will worship. B. 1871.
I will mention (Verse; G). N.
1875.
I will sing of Thy power (Verse ;
A). N. 1877.
Hearken unto me (C). N. 1877.
Turn Thy face from my sins.
(Full ; C). N. 1878.
MISCELLANEOUS SACRED.
Sacred Song, ' 0 Israel.' N. 1855.
The Son of God (St. Ann's tune,
Organ oblig. ; C). 3rd ed. of
B. B. Borthwick's 'Supple
mental Hymn and Tune Book,'
1868.
All this night (Carol). N. 1870.
I sing the birth (Carol). B. 1 71.
Five Sacred Part-songs. B. 1871 :
It came upon the midnight.
Lead, kindly Light.
Through sorrow's path.
Watchman, what of the night ?
The way is long and drear.
Turn Thee again, and Mercy and
Truth; 2 Choruses adapted
from the Russian Church
Music. N. 1874.
The strain upraise (G). N. 1874.
Upon the
(Carol).
snow -clad
' The Choir.'
earth
187G.
764
SULLIVAN.
SULZER.
HYMN TUNES.
(The original appearance alone given.)
In ' Good Words,' March 1867.
Hymn of the Homeland.
In Hullah's 'Book of Praise
Hymnal ' (Macmillan). 1867.
' Thou God of love.'
' Of Thy love some gracious
token.'
In ' Psalms and Hymns for Divine
Worship '(Nisbet). 1867.
Mount Zion, ' Rock of Ages.'
Formosa, ' Light of those ' (' Fal-
fleld ').
S. Luke. ' God moves in a mys
terious way.'
In Brown Borthwick's ' Supple
mental Hymn and Tune Book.'
N., 3rd ed. 1868.
' The strain upraise of joy and
praise.'
In ' Sarum Hymnal.' 18C9.
1 When through the torn sail
(•Gennesareth.'also 'Heber').
In ' The ETymnary.' N. 1872.
•Lord in this.' No- 222. ('La-
crymae ' and ' Penitente.')
'O Jesu our salvation.' 225.
CLuxMundi.')
' Saviour, when in dust to Thee.'
249.
' Welcome, happy morning.' 284.
•Come, ye faithful.' 285. (S.
Kevin.)
' Onward Christian soldiers.' 476.
('S. Gertrude,' also 'Church
Militant.')
' Safe home.' 507.
• Gentle Shepherd.' 509. (' The
Long Home.')
'Angel voices.' 532.
•Nearer, my God, to Thee.' 670
(' Propior Deo.')
1 Art thou weary.' 597. ('Venite,'
also ' Rest.')
'We are but strangers here.' 646.
(' S. Edmund,' also ' Heaven is
my home.')
In Church Hymns with Tunes.
S.P.C.K. 1874.
Christus. 496.
Ccena Domini. 207.
Coronse. 854.
Dulce sonans. SIR.
Ever faithful. 414.
Evelyn. 390.
Golden Sheaves. 281.
Hantbrd. 400.
Holy City, 497.
Hushed was the evening hymn.
572.
Litany. 585.
Do. 592.
Paradise. 473.
Pilgrimage. 3(57.
Resurrexit. 132.
St. Francis. 220.
St. Nathaniel. 267.
Saints of God. 191.
Ultor omiiipotens. 262,
Valete. SO.
Veni Creator. 346.
Also 6 tunes not marked as com
posed for this work, hut pub
lished here for the first time :—
Rt. Mary Magdalene.
Lux in tenebris.
Lux Eoi.
St. Patrick.
St. Theresa.
(Besides 7 tunes specially adapted
or arranged.)
In ' Presbyterian Hymnal for the
young.' 1882.
' Courage brother.'
DRAMATIC WORKS.
The Contrabandista. B. 1868.
Cox and Box. B. 1869.
Thespls (MS.). 1872.
Tria\ by Jury. Ch. 1875.
The Zoo (MS.). 1875.
The Sorcerer. M. 1877.
H.M.S. Pinafore. M. 1878.
Pirates of Penzance. Cb. 1880.
Patience. Ch. 1881.
lolanthe. Ch. 1882.
INCIDENTAL MUSIC TO PLATS.
The Tempest. Op. 1. C., 1802.; I Merchant of Venice. C. 1873.
afterwards N. I The Merry Wives of Windsor. MS.
Henry VIII. M. 1879.
PART SONGS.
The last night of the year. N. 1868.
Choral Songs. N. :—
The rainy day. 1867.
O hrsh thee, my babie. 18G7.
Evening. 1868.
Joy to the Victors. 1868.
1863.
Parting gleams.
Echoes. 1868.
The long day closes. V68.
The beleaguered. 1868.
' Song of peace.'in The Choralist,
no. 160. B.
ODE.
I wish to tune (Baritone and Orch.) B. 1868.
SONGS.
The Window, or the Loves of the Wrens: words written for music
b.. Alfred Tennyson, Poet Laureate ; the music by Arthur Sulli
van. Strahan & Co. 1871. (11 Songs set out of 12).
Bride from the North. C. 1863.
1 heard the nightingale. Ch.
1863.
Arabian Love Song (Shelley).
Ch. 1866.
Orpheus with his lute. C. 1866.
O mistress mine. C. 1866.
Sigh no more, ladies. C. 1866.
The Willow Song. C. 1866.
Sweet day, so cool. C. 1866.
Rosalind. C. 1866.
Thou art lost to me. B. 1866.
Will he come ? B. 1866.
A weary lot is thine. Ch.1866.
If doughty deeds. Ch. 1866.
She is not fair to outward view.
B. 1866.
Ah ! County Guy. A. * P. 1867.
The Maiden's Story. Ch. 1867.
Give. B. 1867.
In the summers long ago. M.
1867.
What does little birdie say ? A. &
P. in ' Hanover Square,' 1867.
The moon in silent brightness.
M. 1868.
0 fair dove. O fond dove. A. 4 P.
in 'Hanover Square,' 1868.
O sweet and fair. B. 1868.
The snow lies white. B. 1868.
The mother's dream. B. 1868.
The Troubadour. B. 1869.
Birds in the night (Lullaby from
Cox and Box). B. 1869.
Sad memories. M. 1869.
Dove song. B. 1869.
A life that lives for you. B. 1870
The Village Chimes. B. Ib70.
Looking back. B. 1870,
Once again. B. 1872.
Golden days. B. 1872.
None but I can say. B. 1872.
Guinevere. C. 1872.
The Sailor's grave. C. 1872.
Little maid of Arkadee (Thespis).
C. 1872.
There sits a bird. C. 1873.
Looking forward. B. 1873.
The Young Mother, 3 Songs-
Cradle Song; Ay di mi ; First
Departure. C. 1873.
O ma charm ante. C. 1873.
O Bella mia. 0. 1873.
Sweet dreamer. C. 1873.
Two Songs in ' The Miller and his
Man,' a drawing-room enter
tainment by F. C. Burnand.
1873.
Sleep, my love, sleep. 1874.
Mary Morison. 1874.
The Distant Shore. Ch. 1874.
Thou art weary. Ch. 1874.
My dear and only love. B. 1874.
Living poems. B. ]874.
Tender.and true. Ch. 1874.
Christmas Bells »t Sea. N. 1S75.
Love laid his sleepless head. B.
1875.
The love that loves me not. N.
1875.
Let me dream again. B. 1875.
Thou 'rt passing hence. Ch. 1875.
Sweethearts. Oh. 1875.
My dearest heart. B. 1876.
Sometimes. B. 1877.
The lost chord. B. 1S77.
I would I were a king. B. TR77.
When thou art near. B. 1877.
Old love letters. B. 1879.
St. Agnes Eve. B. 1S79.
The Dominion Hymn. Ch. 1880.
Edward Gray (Tennyson Album).
B. L. J880.
The Sisters (Duet S. 4 A. Leisure
Hour, 1881).
ORCHESTRAL WORKS, ETC.
Procession March. C. 3863. | In Memoriam. 1866. MS.
Music to the Ballet 'L'lle en
chant^.' May 16, 1864.
Symphony in E. 1866. MS.
Concerto, Cello, and Orchestra
1866. MS.
Overtures : —
Sapphire Necklace. MS.
Marmion. 1867. MS.
Di B»llo. S. L. 1?69.
Additional accompaniments to
Handel's 'Jephtha.' 1869. MS.
Duo concertante, PF. and Cello.
D. Lamboro Cock.
WORKS FOR PIANOFORTE.
Thoughts, Op. 2. Nos. 1 and 2. 1862. I Twilight. Ch. 1868.
Day dreams. 6 pieces. B. 1867. rrj. T
SUL PONTICELLO, upon, i. e. close to, the
bridge ; a term in violin playing to imply that
the bow is used on that part of the strings. For
the effect see PONTIGKLLO, vol. iii. p. 15. [G.]
SULZER, SALOMON, Precentor of the Jews'
synagogue in Vienna, andreformer of their musical
service, was born March 30, 1804, at Hohenems
in Vorarlberg. The name was derived from Sulz
in Wlirtemberg, the ancient residence of the
family. When only 13 he was made cantor of
the synagogue at his native village by the Emperor
Franz I, and in 1825 wai called to Vienna to
conduct the music at the newly built synagogue
there. There he took lessons in composition from
Seyfried, and set himself earnestly to reform the
service by reducing the old melodies to rhythm
and harmonising them. His collection of Jewish
hymns, under the name of ' Schir Zion,' the Harp
of Zion, was used all over Germany, Italy, and
even America; but it was not till 1838 that he
could succeed in publishing it. It contains a
setting of the 9 2nd Psalm (in Moses Mendels
sohn's version) by SCHUBERT, for Baritone solo,
and 4 men's voices, made in July 1828, the
autograph of which is in possession of the
synagogue (Nottebohm's Catalogue, p. 229). In
1842 a second edition appeared, and in 1865 a
second volume. A collection of home and school
songs, entitled ' Dudaim ' (Mandrakes), appears
to be still in MS. In 1866 a fete was held in
his honour and a silver laurel presented to him,
with the inscription 'The Artists of Vienna to the
Artist Sulzer.' From 1844 to 47 he was Professor
of Singing at the Vienna Conservatorium. He
is a Ritter of the order of Franz Joseph (1868)
and carries the medals of various societies. His
voice, a baritone, is said to have been magnificent,
and he was greatly esteemed and beloved inside
and outside of his own community.
His two daughters, Marie and Henriette are
public singers, and his son Joseph is an esteemed
cello-player in the Court opera at Vienna. [G.]
SUMER IS ICUMEN IN.
SUMER IS ICUMEN IN (Latin words,
Perspice XptcoZa = Christicola). A. ' Rota,' or
Round, of great antiquity, the original MS. of
which is preserved in vol. 978 of the Harleian
Collection, in the British Museum.
So important are the questions raised by this
document, in connection not only with the history
of the English School, but with that of Mediaeval
Music in all other European countries, that we
cannot too earnestly recommend them to the
consideration of all who are interested in tracing
the development of our present system to its
earliest sources. We thought it desirable, in the
article on SCHOOLS OF COMPOSITION, to present
our readers with an accurate facsimile of the
original MS., reduced, by photography, from
7x72 x 5 A in-> *° 6£ x 4|, and accompanied by a
description of the colours employed by the
mediaeval illuminator. We now subjoin a solu
tion of the Canon, in modern Notation, but
otherwise scored in exact accordance with the
Latin directions appended to the original MS.
The only characters employed in the original
are, the C Clef; the B rotundum ( = Bb) ; square
black tailed notes, sometimes perfect by position,
and sometimes imperfect ; one square black note
without a tail ; and black lozenge-shaped notes,
also without tails, except in one solitary case
which we can scarcely conceive to be accidental
— the first of the three notes sung to the word
' in.' These we have replaced, in our reduction,
by the G Clef for the four upper Parts, and the
F Clef for the two lower ones, forming the Pes ;
by dotted Semibreves for the tailed notes, when
perfect, and Semibreves without dots for those
that are imperfect ; by a Semibreve without a
dot for the single untailed square note ; by
Minims for the untailed lozenge-shaped notes;
and by a dotted Minim, followed by a Crotchet,
for the solitary lozenge-shaped note with a tail.
For the Time-Signature, we have used the Circle,
and the Figure 3, indicative of Perfect Time, in
combination with the Lesser Prolation — a form
closely corresponding with the Signature 3-2 in
modern Music.
We have thought it necessary to print the
solution of the Canon in extenso, because, to the
best of our belief, no correct Score has hitherto
been published. Hawkins clearly misunderstood
the two Ligatures in the Pes, and misprinted the
passage, at every repetition. Burney corrected
this mistake : but both historians have given an
erroneous adaptation of the text to the notes,
in bars 41 et seq.,1 at the words 'Wei singes
thu cuccu ne swik thu nauer nu ' ; and both, in
bar 40, have systematically misprinted the note
sung to the second syllable of ' cuccu,' giving G
instead of A every time it occurs. It is true
that, in certain bars, G agrees better than A with
Hawkins's misprinted Pes, but, with Burney's
correct Pes, it makes a horrible discord. The
only modern copy we have met with omits the
Pes altogether, thereby reducing the number of
Parts to four.
i The references are to our own Score, the bars in which are
numbered lor the reader's convenience.
SUMER IS ICUMEN IN.
765
With the facsimile and its solution before
them, our readers will be able to criticise the
opinions hazarded, from time to time, on the
antiquity of the Rota ; which opinions we shall
now proceed to consider in detail.
The MS. was first described by Mr. Wanley,
the famous Antiquary, who, acting in the ca
pacity of Librarian to the Earl of Oxford, wrote
an account of it in his ' Catalogue of the Harleian
MSS./ about the year 1 709 ; assigning to it no
positive date, but pronouncing it to be by far the
oldest example of the kind he had ever met with2
— an assertion which must be received with all
respect, since Mr. Wanley was not only a learned
Antiquary, but an accomplished musician.
In the year 1770, Sir John Hawkins men
tioned the Rota, in the first volume of his
' History of Music ' ; illustrating his description,
by a copy of the Guida, in the original square
black notes, followed by a not very correct solu
tion of the canon, scored for six voices, including
those which sing the Pes. Hawkins imagines
the term 'Rota' to apply to the Latin rather
than the English 8 words ; and refers the MS. to
'about the middle of the i.5th century, on the
ground that the Music is of the kind called
Cantus figuratus, which appears to have been the
invention of John of D unstable, who wrote on
the Cantus mensurabilis, and died in 1455.' This
statement, however, involves an anachronism
which renders Hawkins's opinion as to the date
of the MS. absolutely worthless.
Dr. Burney, in the second volume of his
History, described the composition as not being
much later than the I3th or I4th century;
printed a copy of the Canon, in the original
mediae val Notation ; and subjoined a complete
Score, more correct than that supplied by Haw
kins, yet not altogether free from errors.
Ritson referred the MS. to the middle of the
1 3th century; and fancied — not without reason
— that neither Hawkins nor Burney cared to risk
their reputation by mentioning a date which could
scarcely fail to cause adverse criticism.
In 1819 Dr. Busby reprinted the Rota, fol
lowing Burney's version of the Score, note for
note, including its errors, and referring the MS.
to the isth century.*
In April 1862, Sir Frederick Madden wrote
some memoranda, on the fly-leaf of the volume,
referring the entire MS., 'except some writing
on ff. 15-17' (with which we are not concerned)
to the 1 3th century; and stating his belief that a
certain portion of the volume ' was written, in
the Abbey of Reading, about the year 1240.' 5
In 1855, Mr. William Chappell described the
MS. minutely, in his 'Popular Music of the
Olden Time,' illustrating his remarks by a fac
simile of the MS., printed in the original colours.6
Mr. Chappell, has, for many years past, taken
2 See ' Catalogue of the Harleian MSS.' (vol. i. no. 978), in the
Library of the British Museum.
3 On this point, he gives the authority of Du Cange, who says that
the term 'Kota' was antiently applied to certain Hymns.
* ' A General History of Music.' vol. i. pp. 385-iOl (London, 1819).
6 We have given Sir Frederick Madden's remarks, verbatim, in a
foot-note, at p. 268 a.
6 ' Popular Music of the Olden Time," 2 vols. (London, 1855-9).
766
CANTUS I.
SUMER IS ICUMEN IN.
[5]
Col
ec
hzEr— n
•^
o f=^
1 r 1 ^ •
n
I
i
i |
F 33
1 I
l(\Y *-? *>
1 — H
•*?TJ -"J
"^ ~^-T
~*-z — •
- — 1 -^r
J^-
—^
i»j ^J
W7 ci
1
~^
C2
j
t^ Sum - er is
Per - spi - ce
CANTUS II.
i - cumen in,
Xp - i - co - la.i
Lhud - e sing cue - cu.
que dig - na - ci - o.
Grow-eth sed and blow - eth
Ce - li - cut a - gri - co -
Lr ;?-_£) L
— 1
1
1—
1
1
"1 1
1—
-& — 3-
-;,
CANTUS III.
1
1
J
•Sum - er
Per - spi -
1
is i __- cumen
ce Xp - i - co -
1 1
in.
la
'
Lhud-e sing cue
que dig- na - ci •
- CU.
• o.
.^L.
f|ANTTTS IV.
1 —
— i
1
i
—
1 \
Sum - er is i
Per - spi - ce Xp
| 1 1
• cumen
- t - CO
BASSUS I.
—&-
{
•^•^ — ^ <^ — ~
-^s
~\
t
-&
.c«; — :
-&-*• 1
:
vi
i
Sing
BASSUS II.
-<£?- '
cue
cu nu.
-&-'
Sing cue - cu.
i : 1 f i — : 1 : 1 .»* \
Sing cue - cu
-G>- ' f-3 . -&>- •
£2— i r ' > • ~n
— ^*i — r^
. , \&^ —
*r n ^x *~J
1
^J
1
i
J
Ping
cue
cu.
Sing cue - cu nu.
Sing cue - cu.
[I?L .
[21]
1 7~-
--^ G>
-i-3— 1 -. —
~^> —
1 ra ^"^~
— -j T^-
med and springth the ^wod-e nu. Bing
la Pro vi - tis vi - ci - o. Fi -
-I- -^— -=!+- Hrb: ID:*- -^
cue - cu.
li - o.
Awe blet -
Non par-cens
eth af - ter
ex - pos - u -
~ "1
Grow - eth
Ce - li-
sed and blow-eth med and springth the
cus a - gri - co - la Pro vi - tia
1
wod - e nu.
vi - ci - o.
Sing cue
Fi - li
J
- cu.
0.
i r • f5" \ s> sdt^—ztt
-r^ — • : — J-
"^ . . - J
\ , c>
r* a -
1 |_j ^L ^L^ <^-
-^ ui *L
- -& — ?-^ — ^ i
\ 1
in. Lhud-e sing euc-cu. Grow-eth sed and blow-eth med and springth the wod- e nu.
la, que dig - na - ci - o. Oe - li - cus a - gri - co - la Pro vi - tis vi - ci - o.
— 1 — ^g ^JPJ i .» i *y ^? i ^ i -; 1 . ti • 1 1 1 r-i 1 i II
^ - -
pz:± — r r^\\ — £_, — ^-\
1
^4^-^A
Sum - er is i - cum - en in, Lbud - e
Per - epi - ce Xp - i - co - la, que dig •
— ^ 1 £—<s>-^-
sing cue - cu.
na ' ci - o.
(*3 '—* J
Groweth sed and bloweth
Oe - li - cus a - gri - co -
_ -&- • ^? • -&- '
nu. Sing
cue
cu. Sing
cue - cu
nu. Sing cue
"1 ,. ~\-f^-^- 1 <^ •
- CU.
— 1 —
1 — -i
,_^SJ
Sing cue - cu nu. Sing cue - cu.
[25] [29]
1 1 — | 1 — ( i / 1 — — i — i i
Sing cue
[33]
cu
; —
1 1
— i~5 ^ —
J-; •• d> {•*" ' M«
— _ <^*. ~_ zZ*. —
— j
__,_ <^ ^—
^-t& F--
r~ i
1 —
lomb, Ihouth af - ter
ti, Mor - tis ex -
• ^V
calv - T
t - ci *
-z=. h-
cu. Bui - luc
o. Qui cap -
stert - eth, buck •
ti - vos se -
e vert - eth, mu - rie
mi - vi - vos A. sup
sing cue -
- pli - ci-
= ^_|_c^_ \^. — ^ | ^ — ^H
Awe blet - eth af - ter lomb, Ihouth af - ter
~Kon par - cens ex * pos - u - it, Mor -tis ex •
,_ = &^ 2_ , „ h
calv - "e cu,
• i ci - o.
Bui - luc stert - eth,
Qui cap - ti - vos.
J 1 j | j p==1
Sing
Fi
cue
li
r
cu. Awe blet - eth af -
o. Non par - cens ex - pos -
— 1 rj 1 ^ rj 1 . ° J 1
ter lomb, Ihouth af - ter calv - e
« - it, Jfor - tis ex - i - ci -
med and springth the
la Pro vi - tis
I
wod - e nu. Sing
vi - ci - o. Fi
cue - cu.
U - o.
Awe blet - eth
Non par - cens ex -
„ p| ^ q
Sing
cue
cu nu. Sing
-&- •
—I <s>-±—
cue - cu.
Sing
j
cue
i
nu, Sing cue • cu. Sing cue - cu nu. Sing
iji This sign indicates the bar at which each successive Part is to make Its entrance.
1 Abbreviated form of Christicola.
cue
[371
SUMER IS ICUMEN IN.
767
fy • I 1
M J~h J 1 1
1 1
<Z2-Z &
f^t C » •
- cu.
- o.
Cue
Ft
cu, cue - cu.
te do - nat
Wei sing
, et ae -
i*"3 — •
- es thu cue - cu,
cum co - ro - nat
ne swik thu
in ce - li
1 —
EEzi" d2L\
buck - e
ae - mi
vert - eth,
- vi - vos
i
mu - rie
A sup
sing cue - cu.
- pli - ci - o.
Cue
Ft
cu, cue - cu.
te do - nat,
^^ \ '
Wei sing-
et se -
- cu.
- o.
]
<^D -T2
Bul - luc
Qui cap
stert - eth, buck - e ver
- ti - cos ae - mi - vi
c - eth, mu - rie
- DOS A aup
sing cue - cu.
- pli - ci - o.
Cue
Ft -
1
1
1
(^" ~" f~* \
SZ
ri
1
• 1
-±~ \
—*!—
r*51 — gtEzaij
—^ -^
_1 1 1
af - ter lomb, Ihouth at' - ter
- j>os - i« - it, Mor - tia ex
calv - e cu.
- t - Ct - 0.
- fr-l •
/•^^ . c*^
Bui - luc
Qui cap
stert - 'eth, buck - e vert -
- ti - voa te - mi - vi -
eth, mu - rie
vos A aup -
r^i i — ;
^1 • *—> • r~~*
E.
f ""
- cu nu,
sing
cue - cu.
Sing
cue - cu nu,
Sing
<£^ •
^^ . ^.^^ . ^_.
e:
1
1
i
o
- cu.
Sing cue - cu nu,
to!
— -! -•-. ^>-
Sing
cue - cu.
Sing
=> --, /r^ 'j' M
r^ • .
I I i
I
1
r^
tts
I
1 '
1
_^3 ^ \ *-* — 1 rT3 •
-
1
1
nau - er nu.
so - li - o.
H
Sum - er is i _- cum - ei
Per - ajn » ce Xp - i - co
i in, Lhud - e sing cue - cu.
- la que dig - na - ci - o.
ff^ -^"j j-^r
— — . .
*, J V.
es thu cue - cu, ne swik thu nau - er nu.
cum co - ro - nat in ce - li go - it - o.
=l_ ^--^h—
Sum - er is i _- cum - en in,
Per - spi - ce Xp - i - co - la.
*
i ,
1
— ~ .
^-f* " _*••-
0 " "
— &
£" \
' '^J
22 fy ^\ f^ •
^ JTD
I
^ t~~
1
C> — J 1 *D -
cu, cue - cu. Wei sing - es thu cue
te do - nat, et ae - cum co - ro
cu, ne swik thu nau - er nu.
«at in ce - li so - li - o.
— &> — f—
_i ! CT . ^ : a , —
r=;~
\ ' —
-^ ^ — J c-> •
1 —
sing cue - cu.
pli - ci - o.
Cue - cu, cue
Ft te do -
cu. Wei sing - es thu cue
nat, et se - cum co - ro
-&- • ^ . -<s>- '
cu, ne
nat in
• *— ' • — ;
1
]
cue - cu.
Sing cue - cu
nu. Sing cue - cu.
c^? * ^-^ ' Gi
c^i £3
I
1
I
:
cue - cu nu, Sing cue - cu.
[57] [61]
Sing cue - cu
[6$]
• ^-^ — •
nu,
— — *
D * \
?^j—
r^
i — ^ — z^-- —
^
'-
22
ey \
1=3 ^ I
•
1
Grow - eth
Ce - li -
sed and
CMS O -
blow - eth
gri - co -
med, and springth the w
la Pro vi - tis v
. _ —
od - e nu.
i - ci - o.
Sing cu
Fi - I
t r* 7= — *
c - cu.
i - o.
i — 1 e^> ' II
Lhud - e
que dig -
sing cue -
na - ci -
cu.
o.
Z3 ^ £
Grow - eth s
Ce - li - ci
'/*5 . 1 pi
•^ -^ ^2 r^s
ed and blow - eth
is a - gri - co
:b^ ^ :\ ~ \ \ bid H
med, and springth the wod - e nu.
- la Pro vi - tis vi - ci - o.
-i— —Ji r-r- 1 i ^ n
1
_2 1
h-
-j 1 (Ze ;,_ .^ <«
Z> — j g-; .
1 • _,_,
1
" C? H
. ^^ -
Sum - er is i ^-
Per - spi - ce Xp •
cum - en
i - co -
J
in, Lhud - e sing cue - cu,
la que dig - na - ci - o.
Lhud - e sing cue - cu.
que dig - na - ci • o.
7 (^ • n 1 — i ' n
7»— —
—1— ^-^
? — 1±
= — n
\
1 '
! i • **** ^j :~"
3 --=3 • I
d
i-^5 •
j
=• II
swik thu nau - er
ce - li so - li -
nu.
o.
^
Sum - er is i „- cum - en
Per - spi - ce Xp - i - co
in, Lhud - e sing cue - cu.
- la que dig - na - ci • o.
— S3
^ '
-&—-
j= ^_
• • ^
*— ^'"'""n
Sing
cue
rT3 '
cu
•i
-&- *
nu. Sing cue - cu.
•.
Sing cue - cu.
/7\
(-
i ^
^ F^-_
g= f^rh
H
1
± -il
11
Sing
cue
cu.
Sing
cue
cu
Sing
cue
J Burney and Hawkins have both mistaken this note for G. It is quite certainly A in the original MS. In the four bars which follow, the
words and music are incorrectly fitted together in all previous editions.
* Antiently, each voice ceased at the end of the Ckdda, which is here denoted by the sign *. The present custom is for all the voices to
continue until they reach a point at which they may all conveniently close together, as Indicated by the pause.
768
SUMER IS ICUMEN IN.
SUMER IS ICUMEN IN.
an intense interest in this most valuable MS. ;
and, after much laborious research, has collected
evidence enough to lead him to the belief that it
was written, at the Abbey of Reading, by a
Monk named John of Fornsete, about the year
1226, or quite certainly not more than ten
years later. For the grounds on which he bases
this conclusion we must refer our readers to his
own writings on the subject. One of his dis
coveries, however, is so important, that we can
not pass it over without special notice. The
volume which contains the Rota contains also a
number of satirical Poems, written in rhymed
Latin by Gualterus Mahap (Walter Mapes, Arch
deacon of Oxford).1 Among these is a Satire
entitled Apud avaros,2 bristling with puns, one of
which closely concerns our present subject, and
helps, in no small degree, to establish the anti
quity of the Rota. The Poet counsels his readers
as to the best course to be pursued by those
who wish to ' move ' the Roman Law-Courts.
After numerous directions, each enforced by a
pun, he writes as follows —
Commisso notario munera suffunde,
Statim causae subtrahet, quando, cur, et unde,
Et formse subjiciet canones rotundse.s
Apud avaros, 69 — 71.
Now, the significance of this venerable pun, as
a proof of the antiquity of the Rota, is very remark
able. In a Poem, transcribed, as Sir Frederick
Madden assures us, long before the middle of
the 1 3th century, Walter Mapes, an English
Ecclesiastic, speaks of ' subjecting Canons to the
form of (the) Round,' with a homely nawett
which proves that his readers must have been
too familiar with both Round and Canon, to
stand in any danger of mistaking the drift of the
allusion. This form of Music, then, must have
been common, in England, before the middle of
the 1 3th century. Walter Mapes bears witness
to the fact that the First English School, as repre
sented by the Rota, is at least a century and a half
older than the First Flemish School as represented
by the works of Dufay,* and we are indebted to
Mr. Chappell for the discovery of the jeu cC esprit
in which the circumstance is recorded.
Turning from English to Continental critics,
we first find the Rota introduced to the German
musical world by Forkel, who, in the year 1788,
described it in his 'Allgemeine Geschichte der
Musik ' ; reproducing Burney's copy of the Guida,
1 See Wanley's remarks, in the Catalogue of the Harl. MSS.
2 Harl. MSS. 978, fol. 85 a (formerly numbered 83 a, and 106 a).
3 "When thou art sent to the Notary pour in thy gifts.
He will then at once extricate thee from the cause, when, why,
or whencesoever it may have arisen.
And will subject the Cauoiis to the form of the Bound.
4 See ante, p. 260 a.
in the old black square-headed Notation (Gros-
J>'a), and also his modernised Score, in Semibreves
and Minims ; accompanying these by Wanley's
remarks, copied from the Harleian Catalogue.
To this he added a corollary of his own, to the
effect that, though the MS. proves this species of
Canon to have been well known in the middle
of the 1 5th century, and probably much earlier,
the Musicians of that period were not sufficiently
learned to combine it with good Harmony —
assertions which lose much of their weight from
the self-evident fact that they rest upon inform
ation obtained entirely at second-hand, and not
even corroborated by examination of the original
MS., which it is clear that Forkel never saw.5
The next German critic to whom it occurred
to touch on the subject was Ambros, who, in
volume 2 of his great work, follows Forkel's ex
ample, by quoting Wanley's description, and, on
the authority of Hawkins, referring the MS. —
which he himself clearly never saw — to the middle
of the I5th century.6 It is indeed quite certain,
that, at this period at least, Ambros's knowledge
of the history of English art was derived entirely
from the pages of Hawkins and Burney.
In 1865 the subject was taken up by the
Belgian savant Coussemaker, who described the
MS. as written in the year 1226 — or, at the latest,
1236 — by John of Fornsete, 'a Monk of the
Abbey of Reading, in Berkshire.'7 But the
statement rests entirely on information derived
from Mr. Chappell ; Coussemaker himself never
having seen the MS. True, in another work,8
he speaks more independently; and, in his own
name, asserts the Rota to have been written by
'the Monk of Reading,' before the year 1226.
But he nowhere tells us that he examined the
MS. for himself.
In 1868, the argument was resumed by Am
bros, who, in the fourth volume of his History,
confessed himself convinced by the arguments
of Coussemaker, and undoubtingly refers the Rota
to the year 1226. But here again it is clear
that the opinion is not his own ; and that he
himself never saw the original MS.9
And now, having compared the views enter
tained by the best historians of the past century
with those set forth by the latest and most
competent critics of the present day, it remains
only that we should place before our readers the
results of our own careful and long-continued
study of the original MS. [w. s. K.J
5 • Allg. Geschichte d. Musik,' ii. 490-500. (Leipzig, 1788.)
6 ' Geschichte der Musik,' Tom. ii. pp. 473-475. (Breslau, 1862.)
7 ' L'Art harmouique aux xii et xiii siecles,' 144, 150. (Paris, 1865.)
8 ' Les Harmonistes des xii et xiii stecles,',.p. 11.
9 ' Geschichte der Musik,' Tom. iv. pp. 440-441. (Breslau, 1868.)
To be continued.
END OF VOL. III.
>
K original
But the
[lf,S£J
o