Skip to main content

Full text of "Nature and human nature. Three sermons preached during the month of January 1909 in Grace Church, New York .."

See other formats


^Jt\  u 


1^ 


FOiUC  U 

AtTtd    LIM 

i^ature  «nti  ^uman  i^ature 

Three  Sermons  Preached  during 

the  month  of  January  1909 

in    Grace    Church 

New  York 

^ 

'By  the  %ector 

WILLIAM  REED  HUNTINGTON  D.D. 

i.     PSYCHOTHERAPY 

ii.      MESSINA 

ili.     A    STRANGER    UPON    EARTH 

PRINTED    AT    THE    REQUEST    OF    THE    VESTRY. 

#race  J^ousie,  ^eto  gorb 

MDCIX 

iOtature  mh  ^utnan  Mature 

Three  Sermons  Preached  during 

the  month  of  January  1909 

in    Grace    Church 

New  York 


"By  the  %ecior 
WILLIAM  REED  HUNTINGTON  D.D. 


i.      PSYCHOTHERAPY 

I.      MESSINA 

i.     A    STRANGER    UPON    EARTH 


PRINTED    AT    THE     REQUEST    OF    THE    VESTRY. 


#race  ©ouise,  ^eto  gotb 


--MOGI'X" 


'       THE  NEW  YOEK 

PUBLIC  LIBP.AKY 

537726  A 

A^rrOR,  LENOX  AND 

,    TILDEN  FOaiMDATlONS 

«          n             1931             L 

^gj)cl)otf)etapp 


Have  all  the  gifts  of  healing? — I.  Cob.  xii.  30. 

CHE  question  evidently  expects  a  negative 
reply.  "No,  all  have  not  the  gifts  of 
healing."  And  yet  in  this  very  negation, 
there  is  an  affirmative  implied.  Paul  would 
have  had  no  occasion  to  ask,  "Have  all 
the  gifts  of  healing?"  had  he  not  been  fully  persuaded 
that  gifts  of  healing  were  a  reality,  and  that  some,  even 
though  not  all,  possessed  them.  He  is  taking  a  stand 
for  order — that  is  what  he  is  doing.  The  indiscriminate 
exercise  of  a  mysterious  power  by  anybody  and  every- 
body who  chose  to  say  "I  have  it,"  shocked  the  Apos- 
tle's sense  of  the  fitness  of  things.  Though  in  one  way 
himself  an  innovator  of  the  first  magnitude,  Paul  as  a 
church-ruler  believed  in  discipline  and  regularity,  when 
once  the  right  course  had  been  mapped.  "God  is  not 
the  author  of  confusion,"  was  one  of  his  sayings.  Ac- 
cordingly it  vexed  and  troubled  him  to  find  these  Co- 
rinthian converts  of  his  spoiling  a  good  thing  by  misuse. 
More  conspicuously  than  anywhere  else  in  the  Mediter- 
ranean world,  certain  unsuspected  powers  latent  in  human 
nature  had,  it  would  seem,  manifested  themselves  at 
Corinth.  So  exuberant  was  the  religious  life  of  the 
Christianized  portion  of  that  community,  that  it  broke 

[7] 


out  into  forms  of  activity  altogether  amazing.  These 
gifts,  or  "charisms"  (to  use  an  English  form  of  the 
Greek  word)  were  various;  there  was  the  gift  of  tongues 
apparently  a  form  of  exalted  and  unintelligible  speech 
which  called  for  another  charism,  on  the  part  of  some 
one  else,  a  gift  for  the  interpretation  of  tongues  before 
the  tongues  themselves  could  be  understood  by  ordinary 
listeners.  Paul  includes  them,  every  one,  under  the 
general  phrase,  "the  manifestation  of  the  spirit,"  which 
he  adds,  "is  given  to  every  man  to  profit  withal."  But 
there  can  be  no  "profit"  to  anybody,  he  goes  on  to  show, 
unless  care  is  taken  to  guard  against  the  spiritual  self- 
conceit  which  will  lay  claim  to  gifts  not  really  in  pos- 
session, and  also  against  the  disorder  that  must  needs 
ensue  upon  leaving  the  whole  matter  unregulated.  Have 
all  the  gifts  of  healing?  No.  Well,  then,  see  to  it,  ye 
Corinthians,  that  those  who  have  not  are  sharply  distin- 
guished from  those  who  have.  Let  us  preserve  order, 
even  though  a  little  self-repression  has  to  be  exercised  to 
secure  it. 

Certain  utterances  and  happenings  in  our  contempo- 
rary Church  life  warrant  us  in  looking  into  this  matter 
a  little  carefully,  for,  as  in  Edward  Irving's  d^y,  in  the 
early  thirties,  there  was  an  alleged  revival  in  the  Church  of 
the  gift  of  tongues  and  the  gift  of  prophecy,  so  is  there 
now  an  alleged  revival  of  the  gifts  of  healing.  The 
Church,  we  are  told,  has  been  for  centuries  neglecting 
a  portion  of  her  inheritance,  has  been  living  a  maimed 
life  because  of  her  disuse  of  certain  faculties  and  powers 
that  formed  part  of  her  original  endowment.    This  claim 

[8] 


is  certainly  worth  investigating,  nay,  I  think  it  is  our 
solemn  duty  to  investigate  it,  whether  the  subject  be 
one  that  particularly  attracts  us  or  not. 

A  complete  treatment  of  what  has  come  to  be  known 
as  psychotherapy,  or  the  cure  of  the  sick  by  suggestion 
and  auto-suggestion  of  a  more  or  less  religious  character, 
without  the  use  of  drugs,  would  have  to  cover  a  large 
field.  It  would  have  to  include  a  study  of  our  Lord's 
miracles  of  healing  as  recorded  in  the  Gospels,  a  further 
study  of  the  witness  borne  by  the  Book  of  Acts  and  St. 
Paul's  Epistles  as  to  the  attitude  of  the  primitive  Chris- 
tians towards  the  matter,  an  enquiry  into  the  later  expe- 
rience of  the  Church  as  recorded  by  ecclesiastical  histo- 
rians, and  finally  some  investigation  into  such  recent 
phenomena  as  those  of  Lourdes,  Christian  Science  and 
the  like.  So  comprehensive  a  view  is  manifestly  im- 
possible within  the  limits  of  a  Sermon.  I  shall  content 
myself  with  trying  to  make  a  few  main  points.  Let  us 
start,  then,  from  this  indisputable  proposition,  that  all 
real  healing  whatsoever  is  brought  about  by  an  agency 
working  within  the  limits  of  the  organism. 

The  Creator,  or,  to  use  the  non-committal  word 
which  present-day  students  of  science  prefer.  Nature,  has 
lodged  within  this  dual  personality  of  ours,  this  soul- 
and-body  constitution,  a  certain  restorative  energy  which, 
when  given  full  play,  builds  up  in  the  system  that  which 
was  broken  down,  supplies  in  many  and  wonderful  ways 
that  which  is  lost,  and  by  so  doing  makes  of  the  sufferer 
that  whole  man  who  is  called  whole  for  the  very  rea- 
son that  his  deficiencies  have  been  supplied,  his  want 

[9l 


made  good.  The  old-time  physicians  named  this  indwell- 
ing power  of  rehabilitation  the  vis  medicatrix  Naturae. 
The  phrase  has  gone  out  of  fashion,  but  no  better  one 
has  come  to  take  its  place.  The  gist  of  it  is  that,  call  it 
Nature  or  call  it  God,  there  is  a  force  within  us  that 
makes  for  health,  so  that  the  great  question  of  the  heal- 
ing art  must  always  be.  How  can  this  force  be  given  fair 
play  and  full,  how  set  free  to  act,  supposing  it  to  be 
impeded,  how  stirred  up,  supposing  it  to  be  torpid  and 
quiescent  ? 

Before  going  a  step  further,  let  me  call  your  atten- 
tion to  a  point  seldom  noticed.  St.  Paul  in  the  text, 
as  elsewhere  in  the  chapter  from  which  the  text  comes, 
speaks  in  the  plural  and  noticeably  not  in  the  singular. 
He  avoids  saying  the  gift  of  healing,  he  says  the 
gifts  of  healing.  It  is  a  fair  inference  from  this  lan- 
guage that  to  Paul's  thinking  there  is  more  than  one 
way  of  setting  the  healing  process  to  work,  more  than 
one  method  of  enlisting  the  help  of  the  vis  medicatrix 
Naturae.  I  call  your  attention,  therefore,  to  two  ways 
in  which  healing  may  properly  be  attempted,  according 
as  the  malady  in  hand  be  of  one  sort  or  of  another? 
These  two  methods  we  will  call  for  convenience  sake 
the  physical  and  psychical — vague  terms,  I  grant  you, 
and  sadly  insufficient,  but  forced  upon  us  as  beings  made 
up  of  what  we  call  body  and  soul,  while  yet  given  no 
infallible  criterion  by  which  to  determine  just  how  much 
of  us  is  body  and  how  much  of  us  is  soul. 

Well,  then,  for  the  purpose  of  a  parable,  let  us  take 
the  familiar  invention  known  as  a  dynamo,  a  contrivance 

[10] 


mainly  consisting  of  magnets  and  coils  of  wire  so  ad- 
justed as  to  convert  the  energy  conveyed  to  it  from  a 
stearp  engine  or  a  water-fall  into  electrical  power  such 
as  may  be  utilized  either  for  lighting  or  lifting  or  any 
kindred  mechanical  achievement.  We  will,  for  the  pur- 
pose of  our  parable,  let  the  outward  and  visible  structure 
of  the  dynamo  represent  this  mortal  frame  we  call  the 
body,  with  all  its  ingenious  adjustments,  its  connecting 
threads  of  nerve  and  muscle,  its  glands  and  arteries  and 
veins;  and  we  will  let  the  power  generated  by  the  engine 
or  the  water-fall,  as  the  case  may  be,  that  which  sets 
the  whole  thing  in  motion,  "the  very  pulse  of  the  ma- 
chine," we  will  let  that  stand  for  the  soul,  as  good  a 
name  as  any  for  the  animating  principle  in  man.  Sup- 
pose now  that  complaint  is  made  of  a  given  dynamo  that 
it  is  out  of  order,  will  not  work,  as  we  say.  Evidently 
the  condition  of  the  machine  is  parallel  to  that  of  a  man 
who  has  fallen  ill.  The  question  at  once  arises.  How  are 
we  to  account  for  the  disorder?  Is  the  trouble  with  the 
dynamo,  or  is  the  trouble  with  the  power  supply?  If 
the  trouble  is  clearly  with  the  mechanism  of  the  thing, 
the  complex  of  wires  and  magnets,  call  in  the  man  with 
the  tools  and  let  him  mend  the  break;  but  if  the  trouble 
is  with  the  power  supply,  call  in  the  expert  in  dynamics. 
In  nine  cases  out  of  ten  (perhaps  in  a  larger  proportion) 
the  two  would  be  one  and  the  same  person.  The  me- 
chanic and  the  electrician  would  be  combined  in  a  single 
individual.  And  yet  we  can  easily  conceive  of  cases,  can 
we  not,  when  the  man  charged  with  the  double  duty 
of  overseeing  both  the  dynamo  and  engine  might  say, 


This  particular  trouble  is  beyond  me.  I  want  the  advice 
and  help  of  some  expert  who  interests  himself  in  dyna- 
mics alone  and  in  nothing  else,  some  one  who,  though 
wholly  ignorant  of  practical  mechanics,  has  made  a 
special  study  of  the  sources  of  power.  Here  then,  side 
by  side,  not  in  opposition  but  in  harmony,  are  these  two 
gifts  of  healing,  that  which  makes  the  physician  or  sur- 
geon, as  the  case  may  be,  competent  to  deal  with  all 
the  mechanical  mal-adjustments  and  disarrangements 
that  incapacitate  the  body  for  active  service,  and,  on  the 
other  hand,  the  gift  (more  inborn  than  acquired)  th:it 
enables  the  possessor  of  it  to  infuse  fresh  power  into  the 
sick  man  by  the  ministry  of  the  word,  God's  word  of 
sympathy,  encouragement  and  cheer.  That,  after  all, 
is  what  is  most  central  to  Psychotherapy  so  called,  the 
power  of  the  spoken  word,  rightly  chosen,  to  reinvigorate 
that  life  principle  which  is  in  all  of  us,  and  which,  if 
allowed  to  languish,  may  grow  more  and  more  ineffec- 
tive until  it  flickers  and  finally  goes  out. 

The  trouble  with  the  volunteer  healers  who  propose 
to  work  by  psychic  methods  only,  is  that  they  begin  by 
ignoring  that  other  gift  of  healing  which  by  hard  study 
and  careful  training  has  earned  the  right  for  its  possessor 
to  be  regarded  as  the  court  of  first  resort.  In  plainer 
words,  it  would  be  well  if  all  sufferers,  from  whatsoever 
ailment,  were  to  go  first  to  the  educated  physician,  and 
have  him  decide  whether  the  case  is  one  that  the  minister 
of  religion  ought  to  try  to  help,  rather  than  to  go  first 
to  the  minister  of  religion  to  have  him  decide  whether 
the  case  be  one  that  ought  to  be  handed  over  to  the 

[12] 


physician.  That  the  men  intrusted  with  these  two  sorts 
of  gifts  of  healing,  the  one  of  which  derives  its  efficacy 
from  scientific  training,  and  the  other  of  which  depends 
for  its  power  largely  upon  temperamental  qualities, 
trained  solely  in  the  school  of  life,  the  class-rooms  of 
experience;  that  these  should  misunderstand  and  antag- 
onize one  another  is  unfortunate. 

Co-operation  is  the  watchword  of  to-day;  and  as  it 
holds  good  in  civics  and  economics,  so  also  ought  it  to 
hold  good  in  therapeutics.  The  well-equipped  medical 
school  should  be  regarded  as  one  department  of  the 
church's  life,  not  as  a  rival  or  antagonistic  institution.  In 
so  far  as  "Emmanuelism,"  so-called,  aims  at  bringing  the 
pastors  of  souls  and  the  souls  whose  pastors  they  are  into 
close  relations,  Emmanuelism  makes  for  good.  There  is 
far  too  little  of  that  confiding  feature  which,  of  old  time, 
added  so  much  to  the  beauty  as  well  as  to  the  utility  of 
the  minister's  calling.  Sympathy  is  the  chief  feature  of 
priesthood,  and  the  pastoral  duty  which  is  done  only  in 
the  pulpit  and  never  in  the  home,  is  a  duty  most  imper- 
fectly discharged.  Many  are  the  sicknesses  of  the  soul 
that  tell  upon  the  bodily  health  and  bodily  efficiency,  and 
for  the  cure  of  these,  especially  in  their  incipient  stages, 
spiritual  counsel  and  friendly  encouragement,  such  as  it 
is  the  Christian  minister's  high  privilege  to  give  when 
they  are  sought,  may  often  be  more  efficacious  than 
drugs. 

But  it  is  flying  in  the  face  of  all  experience  to  say 
that,  because  suggestion  and  sympathy  have  efficacy  in 
the  curing  of  some  forms  of  disease,  they  are  destined 

[1.3] 


presently  to  discredit  and  displace  the  science  and  the 
practice  of  medicine.  Only  the  light-headed  decry  the 
value  of  technical  training  and  acquired  skill  in  what- 
ever department  of  human  activity.  The  doctors  are  not 
hypocrites.  It  is  an  insult  to  speak  of  them  as  laying 
claim  to  a  knowledge  they  do  not  possess.  They  would 
be  the  first  to  confess,  certainly  the  leaders  of  the  pro- 
fession would  be  the  first  to  confess,  that  their  knowledge 
is  imperfect,  that  it  needs  supplementing  at  a  hundred 
points.  Nevertheless,  such  as  it  is,  we  disparage  it  at  our 
peril;  and  this  is  just  what  the  Emmanuelists,  as  distin- 
guished from  the  Christian  Scientists,  affirm. 

It  is  to  be  noted  that  in  the  cures  eflfected  by  our 
Lord,  as  these  are  narrated  in  the  Gospels,  the  psychic 
element  is  never  pressed  beyond  a  certain  limit.  There 
is  an  economy  of  the  miraculous.  An  extraordinary 
power  is  in  each  instance  exerted;  but  the  ordinary  pow- 
ers, the  recognized  and  customary  methods  of  restora- 
tion, are  never  treated  with  contempt.  Up  to  a  certain 
point  the  great  Healer  relies  upon  that  mystic  virtue  in 
Him  that  goes  forth  to  heal,  but  He  supplements  this 
with  what  we  may  fairly  call  hospital  treatment.  In  the 
case  of  the  nobleman's  son,  care  is  taken  to  ascertain  the 
precise  hour  when  he  began  to  amend,  showing  that  the 
convalescence  was  a  gradual  thing.  In  the  case  of  Jairus' 
daughter,  no  sooner  was  the  child  brought  back  to  life 
than  He  who  had  brought  her  back  commanded  that 
something  be  given  her  to  eat.  The  Syrophenician's 
daughter  was  indeed  made  whole  from  the  very  moment 
when  her  mother's  urgent  plea  was  first  allowed,  but  she 

[14] 


was  left  in  an  exhausted  state  that  called  for  rest  and 
care. 

Here  in  each  instance  was  Psychotherapy  in  its  ex- 
tremest  form.  Nevertheless,  respect  is  shown  to  the  old, 
familiar  methods  of  nursing  the  sick  back  to  health. 

It  will  easily  be  perceived  that  1  am  trying,  and 
throughout  my  Sermon  have  been  trying  to  mediate  be- 
tween two  sides  of  an  unhappy  controversy.  Instead  of 
dwelling  exclusively,  as  just  now  so  many  are  minded  to 
do,  upon  the  dangers  of  what  is  variously  called  Em- 
manuelism  and  Psychotherapy,  1  would  rather  endeavor 
to  discern  what  there  is  in  it  that  is  of  value.  Nothing  is 
easier  than  to  cry  out  against  the  "perils"  of  every  new 
movement  that  is  started;  but  depend  upon  it,  the  surest 
way  of  warding  off  the  perils  is  to  search  out  and  openly 
to  acknowledge  whatever  there  may  be  in  the  movement 
that  is  good  and  true.  It  is  thus  that  unafraid  we  "pluck 
from  this  nettle  danger,  this  flower  safety." 

The  strong  points,  the  wholesome  truths  in  the  "Em- 
manuel" contention,  appear  to  be  these  four: 

1.  That  there  slumbers  in  everybody  who  lives  a 
certain  rallying  power,  which  admits  of  being  stirred  up 
and  made  more  effective  as  a  stiffener  of  the  will  than 
in  its  ordinary  dormant  condition  it  is. 

2.  That  this  stirring  up  process  is  oftener  than  not 
a  matter  of  personal  responsibility,  for  which  God  our 
Maker  holds  us  accountable.  "See,"  said  Paul  to  Tim- 
othy, "that  thou  stir  up  this  gift  that  is  in  thee." 

3.  That  this  stirring  up  process  may  be  greatly 
helped  by  well  directed  encouragement,  and  assiduous 

[IS] 


cheer,  especially  if  these  be  administered  by  those  upon 
whom  this  particular  healing  gift,  by  general  acknowl- 
edgment, has  been  richly  bestowed,  whether  these  be 
ordained  ministers  of  religion  or  simply  religiously  minded 
men  and  women. 

4.  That  forms  of  disease  located  in  that  debateable 
land  between  soul  and  body  known  as  the  nervous  sys- 
tem, and  which  constitutes  what  may  be  called  the  in- 
ternal telegraphy  of  man, — that  maladies  so  posited  are 
peculiarly  susceptible  to  psychic  influence,  and,  therefore, 
often  more  remediable  by  spiritual  medicaments  than  by 
material  ones. 

These  statements,  unless  I  am  grievously  in  error, 
cover  what  is  sound  and  valuable  in  so-called  suggestion 
and  auto-suggestion.  In  so  far  as  suggestion  means  try- 
ing to  help  people  by  telling  them  as  true  things  that 
simply  are  not  so,  I  have  no  word  of  commendation  for  it. 
We  have  seen  enough,  too  much,  of  the  results  of  sal- 
vation by  make-believe,  the  effort  to  escape  from  every 
sort  of  evil  by  denying  the  existence  of  any  sort.  But 
surely  there  are  available  in  God's  revelation  of  Himself 
in  Christ  treasures  of  comfort  and  of  cheer,  treasures  of 
pity  and  compassion,  treasures  of  loving-kindness  and 
tender  mercy  fully  ample  to  meet  the  needs  of  all  who 
suffer,  without  our  having  to  resort  to  falsehood  as  a 
means  of  setting  men  upon  their  feet.  "By  manifestation 
of  the  truth,"  writes  Paul,  "commending  ourselves  to 
every  man's  conscience  in  the  sight  of  God."  Manifesta- 
tion of  the  truth, — that  is  the  sort  of  suggestion  and  auto- 
suggestion that  will  be  most  mighty  to  save.    For  only 

[i6] 


think  how  splendid  the  truth  is,  how  large,  how  comfort- 
able, if  only  we  can  accept  it,  as  it  is  in  Jesus. 


Note. — It  is  proper  to  observe  that  since  this  sermon 
was  preached  the  order  of  treatment  recommended  on 
pp.  12  and  13  has  been  authoritatively  declared  by  the 
leader  of  the  Emmanuel  movement  on  his  own  initiative 
the  only  proper  one. 


iWesis^ma 


iHeggma 


*  *  *  See  that  ye  he  not  troubled;  for  all  these  things  must 
come  to  pass,  hut  the  end  is  not  yet. — St.  Matthew  xxiv.  6. 

^^^^^^HESE  words,  so  reassuring  in  their  tone,  occur 
^  C^\  in  a  pathetic  outburst  uttered  by  the  Christ 
^  J    shortly  before  his  crucifixion.    Swiftly  and 

^^^^^  in  vivid  phrases  the  speaker  pictures  the 
things  that  must  be  expected  to  happen  be- 
fore that  Kingdom  of  God  which  He  has  come  into  the 
world  to  found  can  permanently  be  established.  It  is  no 
holiday  progiamme.  The  panorama  He  unrolls  may  al- 
most be  called  a  lurid  one.  He  does  not  delude  his  follow- 
ers by  telling  them  to  expect  smooth  sailing  from  that 
day  forward.  On  the  contrary,  his  foretellings  are  dis- 
tinctly tragic.  Wars  there  shall  be,  He  says,  and  rumors 
of  wars;  persecutions  there  shall  be  and  famines  and  pesti- 
lences; yes,  and  there  shall  be  earthquakes  in  divers  places. 
All  these,  He  adds,  in  most  significant  phrase,  are  the 
beginning  of  travail.  But  just  because,  in  his  view,  these 
sorrows  and  sufferings  are  but  the  preludes  to  a  glorious 
birth,  the  Master  bids  his  disciples  take  heart.  If  they 
will  but  possess  their  souls  in  quiet  confidence.  He  tells 
them,  in  hope,  in  patience,  the  final  result  will  make 
clear  all  that  went  before  it;  the  outcome  will  justify  its 
antecedents,  and  angry  criticism  of  the  Almighty  will  be 
shown  to  have  been  premature.  "See  that  ye  be  not 
troubled  ...  the  end  is  not  yet." 

[21] 


To  deny  that  such  destructions  as  have  desolated 
Southern  Italy,  during  the  past  week,  and  shrouded  the 
departing  year  in  gloom,  tax  heavily  our  faith  in  the  lov- 
ing-kindness of  the  Almighty  is  idle.  Events  so  porten- 
tous necessarily  subject  even  the  most  robust  optimism 
to  a  tremendous  strain.  How,  we  are  tempted  to  ask, 
can  a  Ruler  for  whom  it  is  claimed  that  his  sovereign  will 
ordereth  all  things,  permit  for  a  single  hour  such  out- 
breaks of  violence  within  his  realm  ?  Why  does  One  who 
expects  his  creatures  to  look  up  to  Him  with  the  words, 
"Our  Father"  upon  their  lips,  allow  such  heart-breaking 
calamities  to  fall  upon  the  children  of  his  widespread 
family? 

1  confess  1  do  not  see  how,  upon  the  basis  of  that 
natural  religion  to  which  many  influential  voices  are  now- 
a-days  inviting  us,  these  questions  can  satisfactorily  be  met 
and  answered.  It  is  a  beautiful  formula  and  a  true  one 
which  reads,  the  Fatherhood  of  God  and  the  Brotherhood 
of  Man ;  but  I  look  about  restlessly  and  anxiously  for  some 
warrant  that  shall  justify  me  in  taking  up  with  it  as  my 
Creed.  Such  a  warrant  Jesus  Christ  offers  me.  If  I 
believe  Him  to  be  the  Son  of  God  from  everlasting,  the 
doctrine  of  the  Fatherhood  becomes  credible,  and  in  his, 
"See  that  ye  be  not  troubled,  for  the  end  is  not  yet." 
I  rest  content.  It  is  noticeable,  for  we  gather  it  from  the 
history  of  nineteen  centuries,  that  belief  in  the  brother- 
hood follows  upon  acceptance  of  the  fatherhood.  It  is 
fatherhood  first  and  then  brotherhood,  not  brotherhood 
first  and  then  fatherhood;  and  it  is  Christ  who  has  so 
widened  men's  sympathies  and  deepened  them  that  the 

[22] 


task  of  realizing  the  brotherhood  idea  has  taken  on  the 
practical  look  it  wears  to-day.  Heathendom  is  still  tied 
to  tribal,  or  at  best  to  racial,  sympathies.  Christendom, 
the  live  portion  of  it,  is  aflame  with  the  desire  to  recog- 
nize as  next  of  kin  "all  who  in  this  transitory  world  are 
in  trouble,  sorrow,  need,  sickness  or  any  other  adversity." 

And  that  expression  "transitory  world"  moves  me  to 
call  attention  to  a  point  that  ought  always  to  be  empha- 
sized in  connection  with  these  fearful  disasters  which  from 
time  to  time  imperil  the  tranquility  of  religious  faith.  A 
"transitory"  world  indeed  it  is,  and  where  we  make  our 
mistake  is  in  letting  ourselves  ever  think  of  it  as  being  a 
permanent  world.  That  is  a  superficial  scoff  which  taunts 
Christians  with  too  much  "other- worldliness."  We  should 
be  in  evil  case  indeed  were  there  no  other-world  convic- 
tions to  fall  back  upon,  when  the  shortness  and  uncer- 
tainty of  this  life  present  is  forced  upon  our  notice,  some- 
times through  calamities  that  shock  us  by  their  nearness 
and  sometimes  by  disasters  that  appall  us  by  their  vast- 
ness. 

But  what  is  the  hard  fact  which  we  are  compelled  to 
face  when  we  consent  for  a  few  moments  to  look  at 
things  as  they  really  are  ?  The  hard  fact  is  that,  in  every 
twenty-four  hours  of  the  earth's  history,  twice  as  many 
souls  pass  out  of  the  world  present  through  the  portal  we 
call  death  as  perished  by  this  latest  ripple  of  the  earth's 
crust  in  the  neighborhood  of  Aetna.  When  the  vital  sta- 
tistics of  the  whole  world,  the  entire  human  race,  for  the 
year  1908,  are  taken  into  account,  the  total  mortality  will 
not  be  very  greatly  swelled,  the  death  rate  not  perceptibly 

[231 


raised,  by  what  has  happened  in  the  Mediterranean.  So 
then,  our  quarrel  is  not  with  the  earthquake,  terriffic  as 
that  was;  our  quarrel  is  with  King  Death,  that  universal 
monarch  whom  Paul  pictures  with  a  goad  for  sceptre 
and  whose  other  symbol  is  the  scythe. 

Therefore,  it  is  not  a  question  whether  we  can  recon- 
cile with  the  goodness  of  God  the  extinction,  last  week,  of 
one  hundred  or  two  hundred  thousand  lives  in  a  few 
moments  of  time,  but,  how  can  we  reconcile  with  the 
goodness  of  God  the  cessation  of  fifteen  hundred  mil- 
lions of  human  lives  within  the  space  of  only  half  a  cen- 
tury ?  The  concentration  of  the  one  or  two  hundred  thou- 
sand deaths  at  a  single  spot  overwhelms  the  imagination 
and  fills  the  soul  with  terror,  while  to  the  fifteen  hundred 
millions  of  deaths,  scattered  over  the  whole  surface  of 
the  earth  and  distributed  through  fifty  years  of  time,  we 
scarcely  give  a  thought. 

Yet  it  deserves  a  thought,  dear  friends,  yes,  more 
than  a  thought,  it  deserves  thought,  this  fact  of  the  uni- 
versal mortality ;  and  if  an  object  lesson  on  a  tremendous 
scale  is  needed  to  convince  us  that  we  have  here  no 
abiding  city,  and  ought  for  that  reason  to  be  laying 
plans  for  municipal  rights  in  another,  that  is  to  come, 
this  horror  of  great  darkness  will  not  have  been  without 
its  use.  There  are  times  in  man's  history  when  no  re- 
ligious lesson  is  so  much  needed  as  that  conveyed  in  the 
short  sentence  of  command,  ''Be  still,  and  know  that  I 
am  God."  Self-confidence  is  a  quality  for  which  much 
may  be  said,  but  now  and  then  it  needs  checking  and  is 
the  better  for  rebuke.     What  these  fearful  scenes,  de- 

[24] 


scribed  to  us  from  day  to  day,  and  still  enacting,  chiefly 
emphasize  is  the  infinite  pathos  of  human  life,  with  its 
brief  catalogue  of  joys  and  its  long  list  of  sorrows,  down- 
falls, disappointments  and  reverses.  There  is  a  poem 
which  is  said  to  have  been  a  great  favorite  with  Abraham 
Lincoln.  It  is  devoid  of  literary  merit,  and  can  never 
hope  to  find  a  place  in  the  anthologies,  but  in  the  one  line, 
"Oh,  why  should  the  spirit  of  mortal  be  proud?"  there 
lurks  a  certain  something  that  appealed  to  the  great,  sad 
heart,  weighed  down  by  the  spectacle  of  a  mourning  land. 
A  master  of  legions,  he  felt  his  weakness  in  the  presence 
of  that  sovereign  Commander  of  all  the  worid,  who,  out 
of  sight,  in  the  background  of  the  battle,  was  the  real 
director  of  the  fight.  ''Non  nobis,''  ran  his  Psalm,  "Not 
unto  us,  not  unto  us,  but  unto  Thy  Name  be  the  praise." 
Our  modem  life  needs  a  larger  infusion  of  humility. 
We  are  altogether  too  vain  of  our  achievements.  Boast- 
fulness  is  our  besetting  sin;  and  so  since  deaths  must 
needs  be  (we  know  not  why),  it  may  be  well  that  now 
and  then  they  should  be  permitted  to  come  in  multitude 
rather  than  singly,  to  the  end  that  we  may  be  forced  to 
see  that  we  by  no  means  own  the  earth  in  freehold,  but 
rather  are  tenants  at  will  subject  to  dispossession  on  short 
notice.  Do  not  understand  me  as  meaning  to  teach  that 
a  sense  of  awe  is  the  only  foundation  for  a  right  religious 
belief.  A  religion  in  which  awe  is  the  main  ingredient, 
is  bound  to  lapse,  first  or  last,  into  superstition.  It  is 
not  good  for  man  that  he  should  be  stunned  and  scared 
into  worshipping.  A  loftier  motive  than  fear  must  ani- 
mate his  effort  to  come  to  terms  with  God,  if  peace  is 

[251 


to  be  the  crown  of  his  endeavor.  All  the  same,  there  is 
such  a  thing  as  too  much  belittling  the  part  which  holy 
fear  and  reverent  awe  should  play  in  the  composition  of 
a  true  character  and  the  growth  of  a  godly  life.  A  con- 
ceited man  or  woman,  standing  at  the  steps  of  God  Al- 
mighty's throne,  and  essaying  to  open  communication  on 
equal  terms,  is  not  an  edifying  spectacle.  A  vainglorious 
arrogant  or  purse-proud  suppliant  looks  strangely  out  of 
place  at  that  particular  spot.  It  takes  a  good  deal  of  hu- 
mility to  make  a  Christian,  and  an  almost  incalculable 
amount  of  that  trait  to  make  a  Christendom. 

So,  then,  it  may  do  us  no  harm  to  be  humbled,  now 
and  then,  and  made  ashamed  of  talking  about  our  gov- 
ernments as  the  great  powers,  forgetful  that  there  is  no 
power  but  of  God,  bragging  of  resources  which,  as  we 
well  know,  when  we  stop  to  think,  are  but  the  small  dust 
of  the  balance  as  compared  with  what  the  Almighty  can 
at  any  moment  throw  into  the  scale,  to  turn  the  beam 
this  way  or  that  at  his  good  pleasure.  Nor  is  the  coinci- 
dence a  wholly  uninstructive  one  that,  just  at  the  moment 
when  we  are  priding  ourselves  upon  the  conquest  of  the 
air,  the  earth  which  we  had  thought  subdued  should  open 
under  our  feet,  as  if  to  swallow  up  our  pride. 

There  is  yet  another  thought  which,  in  the  midst  of 
these  doubts  and  questionings  as  to  the  goodness  of  God, 
we  shall  do  well  to  take  into  account,  and  that  is  this — 
the  riches,  to  borrow  a  phrase  from  St.  Paul,  the  riches 
of  God's  forbearance.  When  we  think  of  the  ruin  and 
desolation  which  the  forces  of  nature,  as  we  blindly  call 
them,  have  it  in  their  power  to  bring  to  pass  on  what  is 

[26] 


really  a  small,  a  very  small,  scale,  and  then  compare  that 
with  what  would  happen  were  these  same  forces  to  be 
exhibited  in  their  plenitude,  we  can  hardly  fail  to  be 
more  impressed  by  the  immensity  of  the  possible  terrors 
which  we  are  spared  than  by  the  volume,  however  griev- 
ous in  our  eyes,  of  those  from  which  we  suffer.  "It  is 
of  the  Lord's  mercies,"  exclaims  the  pessimist  among  the 
prophets,  *'it  is  of  the  Lord's  mercies  that  we  are  not  con- 
sumed,"— and  he  is  right.  In  the  atmosphere  of  the 
balmiest,  quietest  Summer's  day  you  can  remember, 
there  were  latent  forces  that,  if  not  held  in  check,  would 
have  changed  the  countryside,  with  all  its  flowering  gar- 
dens and  fruit-laden  orchards,  into  a  desolation.  In  the 
water-mains  that  underlie  our  streets  and  daily  minister 
to  our  comfort,  there  is  stored  energy  enough  to  do  for 
this  city,  with  its  towers  and  palaces,  even  worse  things 
than  the  earthquake  did  for  Messina.  Why  are  we  safe  ? 
Why  sleep  we  quietly?  Because  we  are  assured  of  the 
firm  grasp  in  which  the  mighty  charioteer  holds  the  reins, 
and  by  a  strong  restraint  directs  the  course.  Yes,  it  is 
of  the  Lord's  mercies  that  we  are  not  consumed,  let  us 
remember  that,  when  tempted  to  complain  that  by  his 
seeming  want  of  mercy  we  are  at  times  tormented. 

How  the  natural  order  and  the  spiritual  order  stand 
related  to  each  other  in  God's  governance  of  his  universe, 
we  can  but  dimly  conjecture.  It  was  a  puzzle  to  the  an- 
cients; it  is  a  puzzle,  perhaps  an  even  harder  puzzle,  to 
us  modems.  Sometimes,  and  under  certain  circum- 
stances, the  two  orders,  the  physical  and  the  moral,  seem 
to  be  working  in  harmony.     At  other  times  and  under 

[27] 


other  conditions,  they  look  to  be  hopelessly  at  variance. 
It  was  a  fond  belief  with  some  of  the  early  thinkers  that 
this  world  in  which  we  dwell  was  not  fashioned  by  the 
Supreme  Himself,  but  by  an  underworkman,  who,  while 
he  carried  out  the  contract  in  the  main  fairly  well,  was 
here  and  there  at  fault,  failing  to  make  the  mechanism  as 
perfect  as  it  might  have  been,  and  thus,  through  mere 
incompetency,  involving  us  who  were  to  be  the  dwellers 
in  the  house  in  manifold  distresses. 

To  other  minds,  moving  on  somewhat  similar  lines, 
it  looked  as  if  the  malice  of  Satan,  the  worst  of  all  God's 
creatures,  furnished  a  sufficient  explanation  of  the  unde- 
served pains  and  sorrows  of  those  upon  whom  towers 
in  Siloam  and  elsewhere  fell  to  their  destruction.  But 
the  unity  of  the  forces  which  control  the  worlds  and  all 
that  goes  on  in  them,  has,  by  modern  research,  been  made 
probable  almost  to  the  point  of  absolute  certainty;  and 
this  has  put  the  supposition  of  an  actively  malicious 
power  for  mischief  out  of  court.  It  is  still  possible  to 
hold  to  the  existence  of  a  personal  spirit  of  evil  competent 
to  and  equipped  for  much  moral  spoliation,  but  scarcely 
possible  to  think  of  such  a  one  as  having  cosmic  forces  at 
his  disposal  and  able  to  wreck  cities  as  well  as  characters. 

Again,  a  modern  thinker  of  great  importance  in  his 
day,  and  that  a  rather  recent  day,  seems  to  have  inclined 
to  the  opinion  that  actual  omnipotence  exists  nowhere, 
and  that  the  infelicities  of  the  human  lot  are  not  due  to 
blunders  on  the  part  of  the  underworkman  but  to  a  cer- 
tain fateful  lack  of  power  and  of  wisdom  in  the  great 
Architect  Himself. 

[28] 


But  no  one  of  these  hypotheses,  ventured  from  time 
to  time  by  baffled  thinkers  in  their  despair,  are  at  all  sat- 
isfactory. We  fall  back  upon  the  attitude  of  heart  and 
mind  commended  in  the  text;  we  fall  back  upon  the 
words  of  Christ,  "See  that  ye  be  not  troubled,  for  all 
these  things,  these  sufferings,  which  are  the  beginning  of 
travail  for  a  mighty  birth,  must  needs  be,  but  the  end  is 
not  yet." 

A  rooted  belief  that  the  issue  will  justify  the  process, 
that  the  outcome  will  explain  the  mystery  of  all  which 
shall  have  led  up  to  it,  that  the  finale  will  fitly  crown  the 
work,  when  the  crowning  day  arrives,  this  is  the  Chris- 
tian's mainstay  in  the  thick  of  the  perplexities,  opposi- 
tions and  misunderstandings,  in  the  midst  of  which  we 
all  of  us  live  and  breathe  and  strive  and  suffer.  There 
may  be  some  more  satisfactory  position  to  be  taken  up, 
some  better  path  to  full  assurance.  If  there  be,  I  do  not 
know  it.  As  I  see  things,  and  in  my  character  as  your 
minister  and  guide  in  matters  spiritual,  I  am  by  both 
honor  and  duty  bound  to  report  to  you  with  all  frank- 
ness such  findings  as  I  reach — as  I  see  things,  it  is  Chris- 
tianity or  nothing;  it  is  either  taking  the  Son  of  Man  at  his 
word  ana  waiting  it  out  till  the  end  comes,  or  it  is  aban- 
doning altogether  the  search  for  what  is  real  and  true, 
and  leaving  all  to  chance  and  fate.  To  be  sure,  leaving 
things  to  chance  and  fate  will  not  make  the  earthquakes 
and  the  devastation  which  they  cause  any  more  intelligi- 
ble to  the  moral  sense  which  would  still  cling  to  us,  at 
any  rate  for  a  little  while,  after  we  had  thrown  religious 
laith  to  the  winds;  but  we  should  at  least  be  able  to  wash 

[29] 


our  hands  of  explanations  which  do  not  explain.  If  in 
reply  to  this  you  say,  "Your  dilemma  does  not  help  me, 
for  Christ  is  to  me  nothing  better  than  a  name,"  my  an- 
swer would  have  to  be,  "If  Christ  is  nothing  to  you,  cer- 
tainly his  minister  must  be  still  less,  and  I  must  give  up 
the  effort  at  persuasion."  But  think  again,  my  friend, 
before  you  finally  conclude  that  Christ  is  nothing  to  you. 
Surely  in  these  troublous  times  his  words,  "See  that  ye 
be  not  troubled,"  are  precious  words,  yes,  golden,  if  we 
can  but  see  our  way  to  taking  them  at  their  face  value. 
Meanwhile,  let  us  rejoice  in  the  one  feature  of  this 
week  of  sorrows  that  actually  wears  a  smile.  I  mean, 
of  course,  the  eager  rivalry  among  the  nations  to  see 
which  can  be  the  first  to  carry  food  to  the  hungry,  com- 
fort to  the  sick  and  bruised,  and  cheer  to  the  despondent 
and  half  crazed.  Such  evidence  of  an  ever-growing  sense 
of  kinship  among  the  races  and  peoples  of  the  globe 
must  fill  the  hearts  of  all  men  of  good-will  with  hope. 
No  protest  would  be  made  against  the  building  of  more 
battleships,  could  we  be  assured  that  they  would  always 
be  engaged  in  such  contention  as  that  which  is  now 
bringing  the  navies  of  the  world  so  swiftly  to  the  point 
of  utmost  need.  Yes,  let  competition  in  brotherhood 
thrive.  Acknowledged  or  unacknowledged,  it  is  the  out- 
come of  the  work  of  that  Bringer  of  good  tidings  from 
heaven  to  earth  at  whose  feast  of  love  we  are  presently 
to  meet  as  brethren  all. 


[30] 


^  Stranger  upon  €artli 


la  Stranger  upon  Cartlj 

/  am  a  stranger  upon  earth:   O  hide  not  thy  commandments 
from  me. — Psalm  cxix. :  19. 

^^^^^^  HE  one  hundred  and  nineteenth  Psalm  num- 
^  C^\  bers  no  fewer  than  one  hundred  and  seven- 
m^  J    ty-six  verses,  and  attention  has  often  been 

^^^^^  called  to  the  fact  that  in  every  one  of  the 
long  succession  there  is  a  reference  to  the 
law  of  God,  its  universality,  its  sanctity  or  its  precious- 
ness.  To  be  sure  the  language,  in  order  to  escape  mo- 
notony, is  varied  as  we  pass  from  verse  to  verse;  some- 
times the  word  employed  is  "statutes,"  sometimes  "judg- 
ments," sometimes  "testimonies,"  sometimes  "command- 
ments," sometimes  "precepts;"  but,  everywhere  and  al- 
ways the  thought  is, — "The  law  of  the  Lord  is  perfect, 
and  man's  blessedness  consists  in  learning  it  and  keeping 
it."  But  before  we  go  a  step  further,  I  beg  you  to  take 
note  of  an  important  point.  This  law  about  which  the 
author  of  the  Psalm  has  so  much  to  say  is  law  of  the 
moral  and  spiritual  sort,  the  kind  of  law  that  addresses 
itself  to  the  conscience  and  binds  the  will.  Strictly  speak- 
ing, this  is  the  only  sort  of  law  that  properly  deserves  the 
name. 

One  of  the  highest  authorities  in  modern  jurisprudence 
defines  law  as  "the  command  of  the  sovereign."    This 

[331 


word,  that  is  to  say,  upon  which  the  one  hundred  and 
nineteenth  Psalm  lays  such  repetitious  stress,  stands  for 
the  control  of  human  conduct  by  an  authority  competent 
to  say  what  ought  and  what  ought  not  to  be  done  if  sin 
and  guilt  are  to  be  escaped.  But  there  is  another  and 
quite  diflFerent  sense  in  which  we  are  continually  hearing 
the  word  law  employed,  and  it  is  of  the  utmost  impor- 
tance, if  we  would  have  our  thinking  clear  thinking,  that 
we  keep  the  two  notions  separate  and  apart.  We  hear  con- 
tinually, nowadays,  about  the  laws  of  nature.  Moreover, 
these  laws  of  nature  may  be  said  to  have  been  codified 
under  different  heads  or  titles.  Thus  men  speak  of  the 
laws  of  physics,  the  laws  of  chemistry,  the  laws  "of  elec- 
tricity, and  so  on.  Doubtless  this  phraseology  has  come 
to  stay,  and  it  would  be  useless  to  protest  against  it;  but 
we  are  bound  always  to  remember  that,  when  we  use  it, 
we  are  using  language  of  a  highly  figurative  and  met- 
aphorical sort.  The  Capernaum  centurion  whose  servant 
Jesus  healed  anticipated  this  poetical  conception  of  law 
when  he  spoke  of  the  forces  of  nature  being  under 
Christ's  control  very  much  as  his  legionaries  were  sub- 
ject to  his  own.  "I  am  a  man  under  authority,''  he 
said,  "having  soldiers  under  me,  and  I  say  to  this  man. 
Go,  and  he  goeth,  and  to  another.  Come,  and  he  cometh, 
and  to  my  servant,  Do  this,  and  he  doeth  it."  The 
thought  implied  in  what  he  said  was,  "You,  O,  Galilean, 
are  in  command  of  the  forces  of  nature  precisely  as  I 
am  in  command  of  the  forces  of  the  Emperor.  Issue 
your  orders,  therefore,  I  pray  you,  and  they  will .  cer- 
tainly be  obeyed,  and  my  sick  servant  will  be  healed." 

[34] 


There  is,  therefore,  very  ancient  precedent  for  this 
symbolic  or  figurative  conception  of  the  order  of  nature 
as  a  code  of  law,  a  statute-book ;  and  we  need  not  quarrel 
with  it,  so  long  as  we  keep  fast  in  mind  the  fact  that  sym- 
bolical and  figurative  it  most  certainly  is.  Thus  we  see 
that  the  scientific  interpretation  of  nature  is  in  a  way  fully 
as  poetical  as  in  another  way  the  Biblical  interpretation 
confessedly  is.  The  loftier  minds  in  science  will  all  of 
them  acknowledge  this  without  hestation ;  it  is  the  school- 
master minds  who  cannot  see  beyond  the  literalism  of  the 
text  books  that  will  demur. 

The  next  point  worth  observing  is  this,  that  much, 
very  much  of  what  is  said  in  this  one  hundred  and  nine- 
teenth Psalm  hold  good  of  law  in  both  those  two  senses 
of  the  word  to  which  I  have  been  calling  attention,  of  law 
as  an  authority  controlling  human  conduct,  and  of  law 
as  the  observed  method  according  to  which  the  various 
forces  of  nature  do  their  work.  The  primary  reference 
is  to  law  m  its  true  sense,  but  in  m.any  of  the  verses  the 
language  can  be  interpreted  in  the  other  sense  as  well. 
The  particular  verse  chosen  for  our  text  clearly  has  this 
double  application,  and  that  is  one  reason  why  I  fastened 
upon  it,  though  another  and  the  controlling  reason  was 
the  touch  of  pathos  that  takes  the  saying  out  of  the  region 
of  pure  thought  and  carries  it  over  into  the  realm  of 
feeling. 

"I  am  a  stranger  upon  earth:  O  hide  not  thy  com- 
mandment from  me."  When  we  stop  to  think  of  it,  man, 
though  he  calls  this  mysterious  world  his  home,  and  in 
his  more  despairful  moods  thinks  of  it  as  the  only  home 

[351 


he  is  likely  ever  to  know,  is  in  reality  "but  a  stranger 
here."  He  is  in  a  wonderland,  bewildered.  He  hears 
voices  which  he  cannot,  without  some  interpreter,  under- 
stand; and  sees  sights  which  either  by  their  intricacy 
baffle  or  by  their  terror  startle  him.  In  both  of  the  two 
orders  into  which  he  tmds  himself  introduced,  the  nat- 
ural and  the  spiritual,  he  is  sore  perplexed  to  know  what 
to  think  and  what  to  do.  That  there  is  a  supreme  Power 
supervising  and  controlling  all  things,  he  dimly  feels, 
but  what  would  that  Power  have  of  him?  How  is  he 
to  ascertain  the  regimen  proper  to  life  under  such  puz- 
zling conditions,  how  pick  his  way  through  what  looks  to 
him  at  times  like  a  morass?  No  wonder  that  this  psalm 
is  a  prolonged  appeal  for  light  and  help.  No  wonder 
that  he  cries  out  in  most  beseeching  tones,  "I  am  a 
stranger  upon  earth:  O  hide  not  thy  commandments 
from  me!" 

What  now  is  the  counsel  that  ought  to  be  given  to 
such  a  suppliant?  It  is  this,  I  venture  to  think.  Live 
up,  O  son  of  man,  to  such  light  as  thou  hast,  whether 
in  the  natural  or  the  spiritual  order,  and  be  constantly 
on  the  lookout  for  more.  Suppose  we  bring  these 
thoughts  and  others  like  them  to  bear  upon  a  recent 
event  which  has  been  engrossing  the  attention  of  us  all. 
There  is  nothing  sensational  in  a  preacher's  attempting 
to  turn  the  incidents  of  the  passing  day  to  spiritual  ac- 
count, to  make  them  tell  in  the  interest  of  a  firmer  faith 
in  God.  It  is  in  this  spirit  and  with  such  an  end  in  view 
that  I  should  like  to  dwell  briefly  upon  some  of  the 
aspects  of  what  is  destined  to  go  upon  record  as  the  most 

[36] 


noteworthy  of  all  remembered  shipwrecks.  I  call  it  that 
because  it  has  illustrated  upon  a  large  scale  and  in  a  most 
vivid  way  the  principle  upon  which,  and  the  method  by 
which  God  is  carrying  out  the  primeval  promise  that  man 
shall  ultimately  have  dominion  over  the  whole  realm  of 
earth  and  sea  and  sky.  True,  we  do  not  yet  see  all  things 
put  under  him,  but  we  do  see  many  things  put  under  him 
which  of  old  time  triumphed  over  him,  and  we  see  plain 
intimations  of  like  conquests  still  in  store.  And  what  is 
the  method  by  which  this  progress  towards  ultimate  do- 
minion over  nature  has  been  effected?  It  has  been  the 
invention  and  the  elaboration  of  tools.  By  means  of  the 
tool  or  instrument,  man  accomplishes  what  for  eye  or  ear 
or  hand  unaided  would  be  impossible.  The  bark  canoe 
of  the  savage  can  be  made  wholly  by  hand;  the  ocean 
liner,  on  the  contrary,  only  became  possible  through  the 
invention  of  adequate  tools. 

In  the  natural  order,  God  answers  man's  prayer  "O 
hide  not  thy  commandments  from  me,"  by  showing  him, 
through  the  process  known  on  the  divine  side  as  revela- 
tion and  on  the  human  side  as  discovery  or  invention, 
how  to  yoke  together  such  forces  as  are  in  the  line  of  his 
endeavor,  and  how  to  combat  and  divert  and  scatter 
such  as  are  antagonistic.  With  every  such  access  of 
knowledge  granted  him  by  the  Father  of  lights,  man  feels 
himself  less  a  stranger  upon  earth  than  he  was  before, 
in  so  far  as  bodily  safety  and  comfort  are  concerned. 
When  we  remind  ourselves  that  the  wireless  telegraphy 
which  saved  the  crew  and  passengers  of  the  Republic  and 
the  resistless  power  which  drew  the  great  ship  down  into 

f37] 


the  vortex  were  mutually  cooperant  parts  of  one  and  the 
same  vast  system  of  forces  whereby  the  universe  is  kept 
stable,  we  realize  what  it  means  for  man  to  be  given  the 
knowledge  that  enables  him  to  make  one  of  the  forces 
help  him,  while  another  one  of  them  threatens  to  destroy 
him,  thus  making  Nature  combat  Nature. 

It  is  written  in  the  Gospel  for  this  day  that,  centuries 
ago,  so  wild  was  the  tempest  on  a  certain  inland  sea,  that 
a  ship  which  had  on  board  a  prophet  and  his  handful  of 
followers  was  covered  with  the  waves.  The  Master,  so 
it  happened,  was  asleep,  apparently  indiflferent  to  the 
fortunes  of  the  craft.  They  awoke  Him  with  the  cry, 
"Lord  save  us,  we  perish."  Then  He  arose  and  rebuked 
the  winds  and  sea,  and  there  was  a  great  calm.  "A  mir- 
acle," you  say — yes,  but  how  wrought?  Not  by  any 
suspension  of  the  so-called  laws  of  nature,  we  may  be 
very  sure,  but  by  aid  of  such  an  acquaintance  with  the 
workings  of  the  divine  will  as  made  possible  the  coun- 
teraction of  one  force  by  bringing  another  into  play.  Why 
not  say  of  modem  man  (to-day  in  his  own  thoughts  less 
of  a  stranger  upon  earth  than  he  was  a  month  ago) — 
why  not  say  of  him,  even  as  was  said  of  the  Christ  by 
the  rescued  crew  of  the  little  Galilean  fishingboat,  by 
courtesy  called  a  ship — What  manner  of  man  is  this,  that 
even  the  winds  and  the  seas  obey  him? 

So  much  for  one  lesson  suggested  by  this  thrilling 
incident.  Now  take  another  and  even  more  important 
inference.  We  are  continually  assured  and  reassured  by 
the  defenders  of  that  relic  of  savagery  and  barbarism 
known  as  war,  that,  were  it  not  for  this  stem  school 

[381 


of  courage,  manhood  would  be  certain  to  decline  and  all 
the  virile  virtues  give  place  to  a  general  effeminacy,  leav- 
ing us  a  race  of  poltroons.  Only  the  other  day  a  con- 
gressman had  the  crass  brutality  to  urge,  as  an  argu- 
ment for  more  battleships  (of  which  we  have  already 
too  many),  the  probability  that  the  coming  generation 
of  young  men  would  demand  its  war,  just  as  previous 
generations  had  done.  Therefore,  it  behooved  us  to  get 
ready.  Doubtless  the  speaker  had  much  to  encourage 
him  in  his  malign  expectation,  seeing  how  eagerly  every 
fresh  discovery,  in  whatever  department  of  the  arts  and 
sciences,  is  hailed  by  the  armies  and  navies  of  the  world 
as  making  the  destruction  of  human  life  more  possible 
and  easy,  always,  be  it  observed,  with  least  risk  to  the 
party  of  the  attack. 

But  are  we  really  shut  up,  dear  friends,  to  such  dismal 
reasonings?  Is  there  no  escape  for  us,  in  this  nineteen 
hundred  and  ninth  year  of  our  Lord,  from  such  utterly 
unchristian  conclusions?  Let  the  scenes  that  accom- 
panied the  wreck  of  the  Republic  reply.  Had  that  captain 
on  the  bridge  acquired  the  splendid  courage  that  enabled 
him  calmly  and  resolutely  to  face  a  sea  of  troubles  within, 
as  well  as  a  sea  of  billows  without  his  broken  ship,  had 
he  acquired  it,  I  ask,  by  any  large  experience  in  the  art 
of  killing?  Had  the  ship's  officers,  had  the  sailors,  had 
the  stewards,  learned  the  intrepidity  which  by  all  accounts 
they  uniformly  exhibited,  had  they  learned  it,  I  ask,  as 
bluejackets  on  ships  of  war?  Some  of  them  possibly 
had,  but  probably  the  most  of  them  had  been  trained 
in  the  mercantile  marine,  with  none  of  that  so-called  "sea- 


39 


537726  A 


soning"  which  transforms  men  naturally  averse  to  blood- 
shed into  the  veterans  whose  efficiency  turns  upon  their 
having  become  quite  indiflferent  to  it. 

And  what  of  the  passengers?  From  all  that  can  be 
gathered  they  faced  a  danger  which  nothing  could  con- 
ceal, a  peril  which  it  would  be  difficult  to  exaggerate,  with 
a  fortitude  and  nerve  which  even  to  men  inured  to  jeop- 
ardy and  familiar  with  alarms  would  have  been  most 
creditable.  Had  all  or  even  many  of  these  acquired  such 
powers  of  self-control  by  having  "drunk  delight  of  battle," 
or  having  faced  batteries  in  a  charge?  Far  from  it. 
These  were  not  people  who  had  war  in  their  hearts,  not 
people  possessed  of  the  slightest  disposition  to  slaughter 
their  fellow-creatures  if  they  had  the  chance;  their  pluck 
and  stamina  were  simply  a  part  and  parcel  of  the  heritage 
of  their  race.  They  thought  it  unworthy  to  let  fright  un- 
man them,  and  unman  them  it  did  not.  So  then,  let  us 
hear  no  more  of  the  necessity  of  occasional  war  as  the 
only  school  of  courage.  The  war  with  Nature  offers 
ample  opportunity  for  the  development  of  manhood. 
Fire  and  tempest,  pestilence  and  earthquake,  let  us  fight 
these  with  the  best  weapons  we  can  fashion;  and  we  need 
have  no  fear  that  we  shall  be  found  weak-kneed  and 
tremulous  at  the  danger-points  in  life.  Blood  can  be  kept 
red  in  men's  veins  without  their  reddening  the  ground 
with  blood  of  others. 

The  firemen  and  policemen,  some  of  whom,  almost 
every  day  in  this  city  of  ours,  risk  their  lives  in  saving 
men,  women  and  children  from  threatened  destruction, 
these  men  have  not  been  taught  heroism  by  war;  they 

[40] 


have  learned  it  in  a  conflict  which  is  upon  us  all  the  time, 
a  conflict  incident  and  essential  to  our  acquisition  of  that 
dominion  over  nature  which  is  man's  predestined  reward 
of  toil.  Until  the  holy  city  comes  down  from  God  out 
of  heaven,  in  that  war  there  can  be  no  discharge. 

There  is  one  more  deeply  religious  lesson  taught  us 
by  the  incidents  of  the  wreck,  and  that  is  the  tremendous 
importance  of  leadership.  The  coolness  and  self-control 
pf  those  on  the  doomed  ship  was  partly,  not  wholly, 
perhaps  not  mainly,  but  certainly  partly,  due  to  the  cool- 
ness and  self-control  of  the  man  on  the  bridge.  It  was 
splendid  leadership  that  told.  Here  also  we  find  our- 
selves in  line  with  the  teaching  of  the  text.  What  was 
it  that  made  this  psalm-writer  so  sorrowful  and  his  cry 
so  plaintive?  It  was  his  sense  of  loneliness,  occasioned 
by  a  felt  need  of  strong,  skilled  and  friendly  leadership 
to  bring  him  out  of  the  dark  into  the  daylight.  "I  am 
a  stranger  upon  earth,"  he  sorrowfully  cries,  "O  hide  not 
thy  commandments  from  me."  What  accentuates  and 
intensifies  the  man's  sense  of  strangeness  is  the  lack  of 
clear  vision.  If  in  the  midst  of  the  dense  fog  which  shuts 
him  in,  he  could  only  discern  the  sharp  outline  of  God's 
commandment,  no  longer  hidden  but  openly  made  mani- 
fest, this  uncomfortable  feeling  of  not  being  at  home 
would  pass  away.  Leadership,  guidance,  a  distinct  voice 
saying,  'This  is  the  way,  walk  ye  in  it," — that  is  what 
the  soul  man  craves,  perplexed,  befogged,  in  the  thick 
atmosphere  of  this  life  present. 

How  beautifully,  wonderfully  and  forcefully  this  truth 
is  imaged  to  us  in  the  similitudes  of  both  Testaments, 

[41] 


the  Old  and  the  New.  In  the  wilderness  days,  when 
Israel  was  literally  a  stranger  and  a  pilgrim,  God's  lead- 
ership embodied  itself  in  the  pillar  of  cloud  by  day  and 
the  pillar  of  fire  by  night.  Later  on,  the  relation  of  the 
shepherd  to  his  flock  becomes  the  accepted  parable  of 
leadership.  The  Good  Shepherd,  so  we  read,  calleth  his 
own  sheep  by  name  and  leadeth  them  out;  and  when  he 
putteth  forth  his  own  sheep,  he  goeth  before  them,  and 
the  sheep  follow  him  for  they  know  his  voice.  Yet 
again,  and  further  on,  we  find  the  author  of  the  Epistle 
to  the  Hebrews  giving  Jesus  Christ  the  striking  title 
"Captain  of  our  Salvation,"  a  style  employed  in  that 
one  place  and  nowhere  else.  But  whether  it  be  pillar 
of  cloud  or  pillar  of  fire.  Shepherd  or  Captain,  the  truth 
suggested  to  our  imagination  and  offered  for  our  accept- 
ance is  this — that  the  soul  needs  guidance,  goverance, 
a  leader  whose  command  when  known,  when  communi- 
cated, when  no  longer  hid,  will  take  away  our  dreary 
sense  of  strangerhood  and  loneliness,  making  us  know 
and  feel  that  we  are  accompanied,  piloted,  safeguarded, 
kept. 

Dear  friends,  it  is  by  no  means  necessary  that  one 
should  have  had  the  experience  of  a  shipwreck  in  order 
to  become  aware  of  the  value  of  leadership  in  his  own 
endeavor  to  make  the  journey  of  life.  Is  there  a  soul 
present  that  will  not  frankly  own  up  to  the  need?  You 
may  not  be  convinced  that  Jesus  Christ  is  the  Leader, 
the  Captain  you  are  looking  for;  or,  if  convinced,  you 
may  not  yet  have  brought  yourself  to  the  point  of  ac- 
knowledging the  conviction ;  but  deep  down  in  your  heart, 

[42] 


you  know  full  well  that  in  so  strange  a  world  as  this  a 
stranger  you  must  continue  until,  at  some  point  of  the 
spiritual  compass,  a  light  breaks,  revealing  to  you  the 
Commander  of  whom  the  old  prayer  says  that  his  service 
is  perfect  freedom. 

How  different  from  our  Psalmist's  querulous  and 
plaintive  cry,  *i  am  a  stranger  upon  earth,"  sounds  the 
clear  voice  of  Paul,  saying  to  those  whom  his  Gospel  had 
enlightened  and  converted,  "Now,  therefore,  ye  are  no 
more  strangers  and  foreigners,  but  fellow  citizens  with 
the  saints  and  of  the  household  of  God."  Oh,  if  we 
could  only  make  the  modem  man  see  in  the  Christian 
Church  that  city  and  that  household  which  to  Paul's  eyes 
it  looked  to  be,  his  hymn  would  no  longer  run, 

"I'm  a  stranger,  I'm  a  pilgrim," 
but  rather  thus, 

"Safe  home  at  last."