Skip to main content

Full text of "The Nautilus"

See other formats


FHE  NAUTILUS 


Volume  107,  Number  1 
March  24,  1993 
ISSN  0028-1344 

A  quarterly  devoted 
to  malacology. 

APR 

1 19S3 

^ 

p^^ 

^^^ 

iX.:, 


^ 


EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Dr.  M.  G.  Harasewych 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

ASSOCIATE  EDITOR 
Dr.  R.  Tucker  Abbott 
American  Malacologists,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  2255 
Melbourne,  FL  32902 


CONSULTING  EDITORS 
Dr.  Riidiger  Bieler 
Department  of  Invertebrates 
Field  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Chicago,  IL  60605 


Dr.  Robert  T.  Dillon,  Jr. 
Department  of  Biology 
College  of  Charleston 
Charleston,  SC  29424 


Dr.  William  K.  Emerson 

Department  of  Living  Invertebrates 

The  American  Museum  of  Natural 

History 

New  York,  NY  10024 


Dr.  Robert  Hershler 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington.  DC  20560 

Dr.  Richard  S.  Houbrick 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Mr.  Richard  I.  Johnson 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Aurele  La  Rocque 
Department  of  Geology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  James  H.  McLean 

Department  of  Malacology 
Los  Angeles  County  Museum  ol 
Natural  History 
900  E.xposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007 

Dr.  Arthur  S.  Merrill 
%  Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Ms.  Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 
Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 
Institution,  Inc. 
Ft.  Pierce,  FL  33450 

Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore 

Division  of  Marine  Geology 

and  Geophysics 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and 

Atmospheric  Science 

University  of  Miami 

4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 

Miami,  FL  33149 

Dr.  Gustav  Paula\ 
Marine  Laborator\- 
University  of  Guam 
Mangilao',  (^.uarn  96923 

Mr.  Richard  L.  IVtit 

P.O.  Bo.\  30 

North  Myrtle  Beach,  SC  29582 

Dr.  Edward  J.  Petuch 
Department  of  Geology 
Florida  ,\tlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431 


Dr.  David  H.  Stansbery 
Museum  of  Zoology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  Ruth  D.  Turner 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Geerat  J.  Vermeij 
Department  of  Geology 
University  of  California  at  Davis 
Davis,  CA  95616 


SUBSCRIPTION  INFORMATION 
The  subscription  rate  per  volume 
is  US  $25.00  for  individuals,  US 
$40.00  for  institutions.  Postage 
outside  the  I  nited  States  is  an 
additional  US  $5.00  for  surface 
and  US  $12.00  for  air  mail.  All 
orders  should  be  accompanied  by 
payment  and  .sent  to:  THE 
N.4UTILUS,  P.O.  Box  7279,  Silver 
Spring,  MD  20907-7279,  USA. 

Change  of  address:    Please  inform 
the  publisher  of  your  new  address 
at  least  6  weeks  in  advance.  All 
communications  should  include 
both  old  and  new  addresses  (with 
zip  codes)  and  state  the  effective 
date. 

THE  NAUTILUS  (ISSN  0028- 
1344)  is  published  quarterly  by 
Trophon  Corporation,  8911  Alton 
Parkway,  Silver  Spring.  MD  20910. 

Second  Class  postage  paid  at  Silver 
Spring,  MD  and  additional  mailing 
offices. 

POSTMASTER:  Send  address 
changes  to:  THE  NAUTILUS 
P.O.  Box  7279 
Silver  Spring,  MD  20907-7279 


TH  Et^NAUTI  LUS 


CONTENTS 


Volume  107,  Number  1 
March  24,  1993 
ISSN  0028-1344 

I    IPD/\pv  ' 

Limacosphaera,  an  I'nusual  Mesogastropod  (Lamellariidae) 

Larva  of  the  Weddell  Sea  (Antarctica)  ,   1 

)_  Hole,  Mass.       j 

The  Reproductive  Anatomy  of  Philomycus  sellatits 

Hubricht,  1972  and  Philomycus  virginiciis  Hubricht,  1953 

(Gastropoda:  Philomycidae)      9 

Two  Confusing  Indo-Pacific  Cerithiids  14 

Rediscovery  of  Tiirbinella  thersites  Reeve,  1847,  with 

Notes  on  its  Taxonomic  Position  (Gastropoda: 

Fasciolariidae)  24 

The  Rediscovery,  Morphology,  and  Identity  of  Conus 

emersoni  Hanna,  1963  29 

The  Benthic  Mollusk  Faunas  of  Two  Contrasting  Reef 

Paleosubenvironments:  Falmouth  Formation  (late 

Pleistocene,  Last  Interglacial),  Jamaica  33 


Klaus  Bandel 
Stefan  Hain 
Frank  Riedel 
Henry  Tieniann 


H.  Lee  Fairbanks 


Richard  S.  Houbrick 


R.  N.  Kilburn 


John  K.  Tucker 
James  H.  McLean 


Stephen  K.  Donovan 
D.  T.  J.  Litllewood 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(l):l-8,  1993 


Page  1 


Limacosphaera,  an  Unusual  Mesogastropod  (Lamellariidae) 
Larva  of  the  Weddell  Sea  (Antarctica) 


Klaus  Bandel 

Gediogiseli-Puliiontiilogisclies 

Institut  und  Museum 
Universit)  of  Hamburg 
BundesstraBe  55 
2000  Hamburg  13 
GERMANY 


Slefan  Main 

A  If  red- Wegener- Institut  fiir 

Polar- und  Meeresforschung 
CoiumbusstraBe 
2850  Bremerhaven 
GERMANY 


Frank  Riedel 

Geologiseh-PalaoiUulogisches 

Institut  und  Museum 
University  of  Hamburg 
BundesstraBe  55 
2000  Hamburg  13 
GERMANY 


Henry  Tiemann 

Zooiogisches  Institut  und  Museum 
University  of  Hamburg 
Martin-Lutlier-King-Piatz  3 
2000  Hamburg  13 
GERMANY 


ABSTRACT 

Marsciiiopsis  conica  Smith.  1915  and  M  mollis  (Smith.  1902) 
have  pianktotrophic  larvae  that  are  unique  among  gastropods. 
They  cover  the  larval  shell  with  a  lacunous  muscular  mantle 
that  can  change  its  volume  by  interaction  of  body  fluid  and 
muscle  activity  This  limacosphaera  larva  is  found  in  Antarctic 
waters  and  represents  the  most  complex  larval  strategy  within 
the  "echinospira-group'  .  Notes  on  the  biology  and  anatomy, 
including  histology,  of  this  larva  are  presented. 

Ketj  ivords:    Lamellariidae,  Marseniopsis.  larvae,  Antarctica. 


introduc;tion 

The  majority  of  benthic  invertebrates  of  high-Antarctic 
seas  brood  their  young  or  provide  postspawning  parental 
care  rather  than  produce  free-Uving  larvae  (Mileikovsky, 
197L  Picken,  1980).  True  pianktotrophic  pelagic  larvae 
are  extremely  rare  in  the  200  to  600  m  deep  high-Ant- 
arctic shelf  areas. 

Plankton  samples  taken  by  the  R/V  polarstern  in  the 
eastern  Weddell  Sea  during  several  late  winter  to  late 
summer  cruises  yielded  only  two  meropelagic  larvae  of 
benthic  gastropods  (Piatowski,  1987;  Boysen-Ennen, 
1987).  Both  of  these  larval  types  were  regularly  found. 
One  of  these  is  Capulus  subcompressus  Pelseneer,  1903, 
which  had  first  been  observed  by  Pelseneer  (1903)  and 
is  described  in  detail  by  Bandel  and  Hain  (in  prepara- 
tion). The  second  lueropelagic  larvae  was  first  observed 
by  Simroth  (1914)  in  material  from  the  Davis  Sea.  Sim- 
roth  noted  anatomical  similarity  to  a  planktonic  gastro- 
pod from  the  deep  sea  areas  of  the  Indian  Ocean,  which 


he  described  earlier  as  Limacosphaera  macdonaldi  (Sim- 
roth, 1908). 

This  animal  is  a  spherical,  transparent,  voluminous 
gastropod  with  two  openings:  one  to  allow  head  and  foot 
to  come  out  of  the  shell  and  the  other  situated  on  the 
opposite  side  of  the  sphere  (Simroth,  1908, 1914).  Simroth 
called  the  muscular  inantle  covering  the  larval  shell  the 
deutoconcha  of  the  limacosphaera.  The  posterior  pore, 
which  he  (1908)  called  the  shell  tunnel  (Schalengang), 
connects  the  sea  water  with  a  cavity  surrounding  much 
of  the  thin  organic  shell.  Simroth  (1914)  also  suggested 
the  presence  of  glandular  cells  and  muscle  fibers  in  the 
voluminous  deutoconcha  that  surrounds  the  shell.  He 
noticed  that  the  Antarctic  forms  represented  larvae  rath- 
er than  adult  gastropods  as  he  had  originally  assumed 
when  describing  Limacosphaera  as  a  new  genus  of  pe- 
lagic gastropods  (Pteropoda).  Simroth  (1914)  correctly 
placed  these  larvae  into  the  ontogeny  of  members  of  the 
"echinospira-group"  in  the  genus  Marseniopsis.  The  term 
limacosphaera  was  retained,  now  to  describe  a  very  pe- 
culiar and  characteristic  larva. 

Simroth  (1908,  1914)  considered  that  the  limaco- 
sphaera swam  with  the  aid  of  their  large  velum.  Another 
mode  of  sw  imming,  mainly  by  hydrostatic  effects,  was 
considered  the  likely  mode  of  propulsion  in  the  water 
column  by  Jevdonin  and  Minichev  (1975). 

These  authors  observed  developing  spawn  of  Marsen- 
iopsis conica  and  foimd  that  the  mantle  of  the  embryo 
envelops  the  shell  prior  to  hatching  from  an  egg  mass 
found  in  excavations  of  tunicate  surfaces.  Jevdonin  and 
Minichev  (1975)  also  noted  that  the  mantle  did  not  fuse 
completely  but  left  an  open  shell  pore.  They  seem  not 


Page  2 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


Figures  1,  2.  Adult  animals  ol  I.  Marseniopsis  conica  Smith,  1915,  and  2.  M.  mollis  (Smith,  1902).  Dorsal  views  on  left,  showing 
mantles  that  are  fused  ahove  the  shell  and  cannot  be  retracted.  Neutral  \  lews  on  right,  show  foot,  parts  of  the  head  \\\  illustrations 
drawn  irom  fi.\ed  animals.  Scale  bar  =  5  mm  for  figure  I,  10  mm  for  figure  2. 


to  have  been  aware  of  the  earlier  cie.scriptions  of  these 
larvae  by  Simroth  (1908,  1914).  Jevcloiiin  aiul  Miiiichev 
(1975)  suggested  that  larvae  with  a  size  of  about  20  mm 
in  diameter  were  nearly  ready  to  metamorpho.se.  Their 
descriptions  suggest  that  their  observations  had  been  car- 
ried out  on  preserved  material  and  they  most  probably 
did  not  .see  living  larvae  or  embryos. 

We  provide  a  new  description  of  the  histology  of  these 


larvae  integrated  with  observations  on  the  li\iiig  forms 
and  their  metamorphosis. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

During  the  cruises  polarsirkel  80/81,  polarstern  ant 
I,  ANT  III/3,  ANT  V/S  and  ant  \'II/4  larvae  of  the  li- 
macosphaera  type  were  caught  at  about  100  stations  in 


K.  Bandel  et  al.,  1993 


Page  3 


—      grounding  linie 

Icnntinenlal  boundary) 


W    •"   E 


Figure  3.  Map  indicating  location  of  the  Wedell  Sea  and  the 
area  where  the  larvae  of  Marseniopsis  were  caught. 

neritic  \\  aters  above  continental  shelf  areas  of  the  eastern 
Weddell  Sea  (figure  3).  Samples  were  taken  with  various 
plankton  gears  (mesh  sizes  of  0.335-4.5  mm)  in  upper 
water  layers  (300-0  m)  and  preserved  in  buffered  for- 
malin. 

Six  larvae  were  kept  alive  for  six  weeks  during  the 
expedition  PS  ant  V/3.  During  this  period  they  were 
fed  two  times  with  a  diatom  suspension.  Only  one  of  the 
larvae  survived  and  metamorphosed  four  weeks  after 
capture  (November  1986).  It  was  fixed  in  70%  ethanol. 

During  the  expedition  PS  ant  VII/4  (January  to  March 
1989)  42  living  limacosphaera  from  RMT  samples  were 
photographed  for  size  measurements  and  transfered  in- 
dividually to  small  plastic  aquaria  (running  water  system, 
temperature  adjusted  to  0  °C).  The  larvae  were  fed  once 
a  week  with  a  suspension  of  Antarctic  diatoms.  After  8 
and  13  months  the  photographic  measurements  of  larvae 
or  juveniles  were  repeated. 

The  larval  shell,  the  thick,  whitish  to  semitransparent 
tissue  covering  it  (deutoconcha),  and  the  juvenile  shell 
were  studied  on  10  critical-point  dried  specimens  using 
a  SEM. 

In  May  1989,  six  living  larvae  were  fixed  for  histolog- 
ical studies  in  4%  seawater-formalin  or  2.5%  seawater- 
glutaraldehyde.  One  limacosphaera  fixed  in  formalin  was 
dehydrated  using  isopropanol.  It  was  then  treated  with 
benzylbenzoate,  embedded  in  paraplast,  serially  sec- 
tioned (7  ytm)  and  stained  with  Helioechtrubin  BBL/ 
Acidgreen  5/Acidorange  10  after  Halmi  (Adam  &  Czi- 
hak,  1964). 

To  detect  lipids  whole  larvae  without  the  deutoconcha 
as  well  as  parts  of  the  deutoconcha  were  treated  using 
the  oil-red-niethod  (Romeis,  1968).  These  samples  were 
embedded  in  glycerin  and  examined  with  a  light  mi- 
croscope. 

Another  limacosphaera  fixed  in  glutaraldehyde  was 
osmicated  in  1%  osmium  tetroxide,  dehydrated  in  ace- 


Figure  4.  Larva  of  Marseniopsis  cf.  mollis.  Schematic  drawing 
from  several  photr)graphs  of  living  specimens.  One  quarter  of 
the  shell-covering  tissue  (deutoconcha)  is  removed,  d,  deuto- 
concha; e,  eye;  ed,  epidermis;  f,  foot;  s,  shell;  si,  siphon;  st, 
apical  tube;  t,  tentacle;  v,  velum. 


tone  and  embedded  in  Spurr's  fluid.  Sections  were  cut 
at  ca.  80  nm  to  1  ^m  using  an  ultramicrotome  (Reichert). 
The  80  nm  sections  were  stained  with  uranyl  acetate  and 
lead  citrate,  then  examined  and  photographed  using  a 
TEM  (Zeiss).  The  1  ^m  sections  were  stained  with  To- 
luidine  Blue  and  Pyronin  and  examined  with  a  light 
microscope. 

Voucher  material  is  deposited  at  the  Zoological  Insti- 
tute and  Museum  (L'niversity  of  Hamburg)  (cat.  no.  M 
885). 


RESULTS 

The  Living  Larva 

Description:  The  shape  of  the  limacosphaera  (figures 
4-6)  is  globular  with  an  overall  diameter  ranging  from 
1.8  to  20  mm.  The  actual  larval  shell  is  covered  by  the 
deutoconcha.  Some  of  the  larvae  have  granular  deposits 
in  the  outer  layer  of  the  deutoconcha.  On  the  ventral 
side  of  the  larva  (figure  6)  there  is  a  slit-like  opening  for 
the  foot  and  the  four  large  velar  lobes.  This  opening  is 
extended  anteriorly  by  a  siphon-like,  semicircular  groove. 
A  second,  small,  tunnel-like  excavation  extends  from  the 
apical  region  of  the  shell  to  the  surface  of  the  deutocon- 
cha. Observations  on  living  larvae  sorted  from  plankton 
samples  show  that  both  openings  can  be  closed  and  that 
the  deutoconcha  produces  much  hyaline  mucus. 

During  metamorphosis  the  shell  is  still  barely  calcified 
(figure  7),  becoming  solidly  calcified  right  after  meta- 
morphosis (figure  8).  The  larval  shell  reaches  2.3  whorls 
with  fine  spiral  threads  on  the  first  1.5  whorls.  Earliest 
growth  lines  are  visible  after  0.8  whorls  (figure  9  arrow). 
In  well  fed  larvae,  the  greenish  visceral  mass  can  be  seen 
through  the  shell  and  the  deutoconcha. 

All  studied  larvae  had  a  well  developed  foot.  The  eyes 
are  at  the  base  of  the  tentacles.  In  contrast  to  Simroth's 
original  description  of  Limacosphaera  macdonaldi  from 


Page  4 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


Figures  5,  6.  Living  larvae  ul  A/(j),Miii(>/;.si.v  cj.  mollis.  5. 
Dorsal  view.  6.  Ventral  view,  with  foot,  velum,  tentacles  and 
eyes  visible.  Scale  bars  =  5  mm  for  liolh  pliotograjihs 

the  tropics,  the  operculum  is  absent  in  the  Antarctic 
specimens. 

Biology 

Deposition  of  egg  capsules  in  the  tests  of  compound  as- 
cidians  is  known  for  temperate  lamellarian  species  (Fret- 
ter  &  Graham,  1962).  Antarctic  species  have  the  same 
spawning  habit  (Jevdonin  &  Minichev,  1975;  P.  Dayton, 
personal  communication).  One  compound  ascidian  with 
appro.xiinately  20  egg  capsules  was  obtained  in  February 
1989.  Although  maintained  in  an  aquarium,  the  eggs 
failed  to  develop. 


Figures  7-9.  Shell  of  Marseniopsis  cj.  mollis.  7.  During  meta- 
morphosis, the  shell  is  barely  calcified  and  therefore,  flexible. 
8.  .Alter  metamorphosis,  shell  solidly  calcified  and  lias  reached 
2  4  whorls.  9.  Same  specimen  as  in  fig,  8.  P'irst  growth  lines 
(arrow)  are  visible  at  0  7  whorls  of  the  shell  The  sjjiral  threads 
end  at  1.4  whorls.  Scale  bars  =  1  mm  in  all  photographs. 

Larval  size,  as  well  as  the  time  and  location  of  sam- 
pling, indicates  that  hatching  of  larvae  occurs  from  late 
winter  to  austral  summer  in  the  shelf  areas  of  the  eastern 
Weddell  Sea. 

The  smallest  larvae  found  have  a  diameter  of  1.8  mm. 
We  suggest  that  this  size  is  reached  shortK  after  the 
larvae  have  hatched  and  risen  from  the  l)ottoni.  Aquar- 
ium observations  indicate  that  the  larvae  rise  by  buoy- 
ancy. The  large  velar  lobes  are  not  used  or  have  only 
secondary  function.  The  buoyancy  control  mechanism  is 
uiikuow  n. 

In  the  northern  shell  areas  of  the  Weddell  Sea  the 
amount  of  food  (0.07  ixg  chlorophyll -a/liter)  is  more 


K.  Bandel  et  al.,  1993 


Page  5 


Figure  10.  ScluMiuitir  draw  iiig  ot  the  ajMciil  lulx'  (shell  tuiiiu-lj 
of  Marseniopsis  cf.  mollis,  c,  cilia;  cc,  collagenous  cell;  cf, 
collagen  fibers;  gc,  gland  cell;  mf,  muscular  fibers;  mv,  micro- 
villi; n,  nuclei;  s,  shell;  st,  apical  tube 


limited  even  during  phytoplankton  blooms.  In  open  wa- 
ters or  polynyas  (ice  free  areas),  the  phytoplankton  con- 
centration barely  reaches  1.5  ng  chi  a/liter.  It  is  sus- 
pected that  growth  of  larvae  in  these  areas  takes  a  much 
longer  time. 

The  total  Hpid  content  of  larvae  caught  in  February 
(end  of  austral  summer)  is  low  (3.5%  dry  weight)  in 
comparison  to  other  planktonic  organisms.  Seventy  per- 
cent of  these  lipids  are  triacylglycerols  (Hagen,  1988). 

Although  fed  only  twice,  one  limacosphaera  caught  in 
October  1986  metamorphosed  four  weeks  later.  During 
PS  Ant  VII/4  small  larvae  with  a  diameter  of  3.9  mm 
began  to  metamorphose  in  the  aquaria  after  10  to  24 
hours,  while  specimens  of  10  mm  diameter  remained  in 
the  larval  stage  for  up  to  8  weeks.  One  specimen  caught 
in  the  end  of  February  1989  was  still  in  the  larval  stage 
when  it  died  in  August  1990. 

Predatory  pressure  on  the  larvae  seems  to  be  very  low. 
The  shell-covering  tissue  of  juveniles  and  adults  is  known 
to  produce  acidic  secretions. 


HISTOLOGY 

Observations  with  Light  Microscope 

The  deutoconcha  of  the  limacosphaera  consists  of  tissue 
that  is  composed  of  an  outer  epidermis,  a  central,  cav- 
ernous connective  tissue,  and  an  inner  epidermis  cov- 
ering the  shell. 

The  outer  epidermis  is  composed  of  a  single  layer  of 
cells  with  flattened  nuclei  and  immersed,  large,  light, 
glandular  cells  with  a  single  nucleus.  Below  it  is  a  vo- 
luminous, spacious  connective  tissue,  consisting  of  col- 
lagenous and  muscular  fibers  with  few  cells  suspended 
in  it.  The  inner  epidermis  is  a  single  layer  of  cells  sup- 
ported by  connective  tissue  and  muscle  fibers.  These  cells 
are  stretched  in  length,  and  their  nuclei  are  even  more 
flattened  than  those  of  the  outer  epidermis. 

The  deutoconcha  of  the  limacosphaera  is  connected 


to  the  inner  mantle  of  the  apertural  region  of  the  shell 
by  an  especially  strong  muscular  bridge  of  tissue.  The 
outer  mantle  rests  on  the  shell  near  the  aperture  and 
forms  the  connection  to  the  inner  mantle  covering  the 
visceral  mass  and  the  pallial  cavity.  Outer  and  inner 
mantle  are  "divided"  from  each  other  by  the  periostraca! 
gland  zone  characterized  by  the  presence  of  many  nuclei. 

On  the  apical  side  of  the  deutoconcha  the  e.xternal 
mantle  is  pierced  by  a  tube-like  canal  (figure  10,  st) 
connecting  sea  water  and  shell  surface.  This  canal  is  lined 
with  a  rugged,  ciliated  epithelium  (figure  10,  c)  that 
continues  along  the  inner  mantle  for  about  0.4  mm,  to 
form  a  small  cavity  between  shell  and  mantle  (figure  10). 
The  tissue  below  the  ciliated  epithelium  of  the  canal 
contains  an  agglomeration  of  large  light  epithelial  glan- 
dular cells. 

The  iimer  side  of  the  deutoconcha  connects  to  the 
organic  shell  that  is  composed  of  a  double-layered  peri- 
ostracum.  This  shell  in  its  apical  portion  is  filled  with  the 
visceral  mass  containing  the  large  digestive  gland.  Its 
diverticula  consist  of  large  endodermal  cells  with  basal 
nuclei  and  small  cavities.  The  apical  portion  of  the  di- 
gestive gland  is  glandular  and  contains  three  different 
types  of  stored  substances.  The  most  basal  portion  con- 
tains proteins,  somewhat  above  lie  a  large  number  of 
spherical  bodies.  Scale-like  storage  material  that  is  weak- 
ly aeidophilous  is  suspended  between  these. 

The  spherical  bodies  (6-19  ^m  in  diameter)  are  lipids 
(analysed  by  oil-red  method).  The  spheres  of  lipids  were 
arranged  like  strings  of  pearls  of  different  length 
throughout  the  entire  digestive  gland  of  a  larva  caught 
in  February  1989  during  the  phytoplankton  bloom. 

The  outer  surface  of  the  deutoconcha  was  also  tested 
for  the  presence  of  lipids,  but  was  found  to  lack  them. 
This  test  was  repeated  on  another  larva  that  had  been 
caught  prior  to  the  beginning  of  the  phytoplankton  bloom 
(mid-November  1986).  It  lacked  lipids  in  either  the  man- 
tle or  the  digestive  gland. 

Of  the  other  organs  of  the  larva,  the  nerve  ring  proved 
to  be  quite  large.  The  eyes  were  well-developed,  with 
lens-like  light  collectors.  The  foot  is  intensely  ciliated, 
almost  to  the  same  degree  as  the  large  velum.  The  radula 
is  well  developed  and  functional. 


Observations  with  Electron  Microscope 

The  epidermis  of  the  deutoconcha  (figure  11)  is  covered 
by  a  2  ^m  high  rim  of  microvilli.  These  microvilli  are 
differentiated  into  a  narrow  basal  portion  with  many 
filaments  and  a  light,  partly  bubble-like  expanded  upper 
portion. 

These  "bubbles"  are  secretory  vesicles,  usually  linearly 
arranged  and  attaining  2-4  times  the  width  of  the  mi- 
crovilli. They  are  produced  by  glandular  cells  at  the  base 
of  the  rim  of  microvilli  and  are  secreted  at  the  outside 
of  the  rim.  "Bubbles"  open  up  at  the  outside  of  the  rim 
as  could  be  seen  in  some  sections. 

The  surface  of  the  rim  of  microvilli  is  covered  with 
fine  fibrillar  material  containing  small  dark  granules. 


Page  6 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


Between  microvilli,  larger  vesicles  with  a  small  internal 
membrane  are  often  present.  Some  larger  vesicles  are  as 
high  as  the  microvilli  and  are  connected  to  the  glandular 
vesicles  of  the  epidermis. 

The  epithelium  of  the  deutoconcha  consists  of  a  single 
layer  of  flattened  cells  resting  on  a  distinct  basal  mem- 
brane. The  cells  are  up  to  10  ^m  in  size,  and  are  con- 
nected to  each  other  by  apical  contact  zones.  Cell  bound- 
aries are  strongly  folded  and  intercalated. 

Some  nuclei  are  strongly  heterochromatic,  others  are 
large,  less  densely  packed  and  of  irregular  shape.  All  cells 
hold  large,  light  vesicles  often  containing  membranous 
extensions.  These  vesicles  form  a  loosely  connected  sys- 
tem that  is  in  contact  with  the  vesicles  extruded  into  the 
rim  of  microvilli.  Newly  extruded  vesicles  hold  dense 
granules. 

A  voluminous  connective  tissue  is  present  below  the 
epidermis  and  fills  the  space  between  inner  and  outer 
layer  of  the  deutoconcha.  Within  a  homogeneous  basal 
substance,  individual,  transversally  striped  fibers  of  col- 
lagen connect  the  basal  membrane  of  cells  within  the 
tissue  to  the  epidermis. 

Large  cavities  lie  within  the  connective  tissue  near  the 
epidermis.  These  cavities  are  lined  with  a  thin,  conspic- 
uously foamy  cellular  layer  resting  on  a  basal  membrane. 
The  nuclei  are  flattened  and  elongated. 

Nerves,  consisting  of  several  axones  within  a  glial  cell, 
and  smooth  muscular  fibers  with  connections  to  the  col- 
lagen fibers  are  distributed  within  the  connective  tissue. 

The  intermediate  layer  between  outer  and  inner  ep- 
ithelia  (gelatinous  layer,  Simroth,  1908)  is  shown  to  con- 
tain a  network  of  collagenous  fibers  connected  to  muscle 
and  epithelial  cells.  This  layer  functions  together  with 
interconnected  blood  lacunae  as  a  hydroskeleton  that  can 
change  the  outline,  shape  and  width  of  the  limacos- 
phaera. 

The  apical  tube  (figures  4,  10,  st)  of  the  deutoconcha 
is  ciliated,  in  contrast  to  the  remaining  surface  of  the 
mantle.  This  ciliation  continues  into  the  small  cavity  at 
the  proximal  end  of  tube  above  the  shell.  This  cavity  is 
less  extensive  than  assumed  by  Simroth  (1908)  and  does 
not  surround  the  entire  shell  surface. 

Simroth  (1908)  noted  a  folded  surface  of  the  shell, 
which  is  an  artifact  of  preservation. 

A  rim  of  microvilli  on  a  unilayered  epithelium  sur- 
rounding a  structured  connective  tissue  represents  a  large 
surface  for  resorption  as  well  as  for  secretion  by  many 
glandular  cells  that  come  together  in  canals  opening  into 
pores.  The  type  of  secretion  produced  by  these  glands  is 
unknown.  The  secretion  expelled  between  the  microvilli 
probably  represent  neutral  mucus  material. 

DISCUSSION 

The  larvae  metamorphosed  into  juveniles  that  had  either 
a  smooth  surface  or  a  tuberculated  body  surface.  Both 
juvenile  forms  were  analysed  by  gel-elect rophoresis  (ID- 
UISK-SI)S-PA(;E)  at  the  Alfred-Wegener-in.stitut  (Dr. 
T.  Stadler).  The  results  were  compared  to  gel-electro- 


Bum 


cb 


Figure  11.  Transmission  Electron  Micrograph  of  the  deuto- 
concha epidernii.s  of  Marscniopsis  cf.  mollis,  bm,  ba.sal  mem- 
brane; ci),  cell  boundary;  ct,  connective  tissue;  mv,  microvilli; 
n,  nucleus. 


phoresis  (same  method)  analyses  of  adult  Marseniopsis 
conica  and  Marseniopsis  mollis.  Differences  in  the  data 
indicate  that  the  predominantly  smooth  juveniles  re- 
present M.  mollis  and  the  tuberculated  ones  M.  conica. 
I'hus  it  can  be  concluded  that  both  species  have  very 
similar  larvae.  It  was  not  possible  to  section  and  electro- 
phoretically  analyse  the  same  individual. 

The  course  of  a  limacosphaera's  development  depends 
on  a  variety  of  factors,  including  currents  in  the  upper 
water  layers,  melting  of  sea  ice,  and  patchyness  of  phy- 
toplankton  production.  Larval  survival  in  captivity  for 
1.5  years  indicates  that  a  limacosphaera  could  remain  in 
the  plankton  for  over  a  year  if  conditions  were  not  fa- 
vorable for  metamorphosis. 

Analyses  of  lipid  content  suggest  that  larvae  either  use 
most  food-energy  for  growth  or  they  store  energy  in  form 
of  other  biochemical  metabolites  {e.g.,  proteins).  The 
vertical  distribution  and  the  stomach  contents  of  larvae 
caught  during  mid-October  at  72°S  indicate  that  they 
feed  under  the  sea  ice  where  the  phytoplankton  concen- 
tration (0.07  ng  chl- a/liter)  was  seven  times  larger  than 
in  deeper  water  (Scharek,  personal  communication).  Due 
to  the  southwcsterK  water  currents  near  the  surface,  the 
majority  of  larvae  will  be  transported  to  southern  parts 
of  the  study  area,  where  very  high  phytoplankton  con- 
centrations (50-150  ^g  chla/liter)  were  measured  di- 
rectly under  the  sea  ice  in  October  1989.  By  utilization 
of  this  enormous  food  resource,  larvae  living  in  that  area 
could  grow  very  rapidly.  Due  to  the  fact  that  the  macro- 
zoobenthos  community  of  the  southern  Weddell  Sea  is 
totally  different  from  that  of  the  eastern  Weddell  Sea 
(Voss,  1988)  and  therefore  not  suitable  for  survival  of 
beiithic  stages  of  Marseniopsis,  there  nuist  be  a  way  of 


K.  Bandel  et  al.,  1993 


Page  7 


returning  pelagic  stages  (metamorphosing  larvae,  juve- 
niles or  adults)  back  to  the  hatching  grounds.  This  may 
be  accomplished  by  counter-currents  nuining  near  the 
bottom. 

Piatkowski  (1987)  and  Boysen-Ennen  (1987)  reported 
the  absence  of  larvae  in  the  oceanic  domain  between  the 
tip  of  tlie  Antarctic  peninsula  and  the  north-eastern  part 
of  the  Weddell  Sea.  Marseniopsis  populations  of  the 
peninsula  are  likely  zoogeographically  separated  from 
populations  in  the  eastern  Weddell  Sea.  Nevertheless 
some  of  the  larvae  could  be  transported  by  eastward  wind 
drift  ot  surface  water  layers  near  the  ice  edge  from 
eastern-Antarctica  to  the  Weddell  Sea.  Between  Feb- 
ruary and  March  1983,  the  mean  abundance  of  larvae 
in  the  eastern  Weddell  Sea  was  24  specimens  per  1,000 
m'  (Boysen-Ennen,  1987),  with  maximum  densities  of 
65  larvae  per  1,000  m'  in  the  southern  part  of  the  study 
area  (Piatkowski,  1987).  Most  larvae  were  found  in  water 
layers  of  200  to  50  m  (63%)  and  50  to  0  m  (35%),  only 
2%  were  reported  from  300  to  200  m  depth  (Boysen- 
Ennen,  1987).  The  major  function  of  the  deutoconcha  is 
that  of  a  buoyancy  organ.  Altering  the  volume  of  the 
outer  mantle  may  vary  the  speed  of  sinking  of  the  li- 
macosphaera.  According  to  Stokes  formula  (Tiemann  & 
Betz,  1979)  this  speed  depends  on  the  specific  weight, 
which  again  is  a  function  of  the  diameter  of  the  lima- 
cosphaera.  Histological  analyses  of  the  limacosphaera 
showed  that  the  deutoconcha  contains  very  little  organic 
material  and  is  thus  very  close  to  the  density  of  sea  water. 
The  deutoconcha  can  enlarge  the  diameter  and  thus  the 
volume  of  the  larva  without  decreasing  its  weight  in  the 
water.  A  general  calculation  indicated  that  the  volumi- 
nous outer  mantle  of  the  limacosphaera  decreases  the 
speed  of  its  sinking  to  about  one  half  of  what  it  would 
be  without  such  a  cover  around  the  shell 

The  ability  to  float  was  observed  in  aquaria  for  all 
developmental  stages.  Even  large  adult  specimens  could 
float  near  the  bottom  after  disturbance  (diving  obser- 
vations at  the  Antarctic  peninsula,  W.  Wagele,  personal 
communication). 

The  function  of  the  deutoconcha's  apical  tube  and 
cavity  is  still  unknown.  It  is  evident  that  water  can  be 
pumped  into  the  cavity  and  expelled  out  by  ciliary  cur- 
rents as  well  as  by  muscular  movements  of  the  deuto- 
concha. It  is  also  evident  that  glands  can  secrete  sub- 
stances into  the  lumen  of  tube  and  cavity. 

Histological  examination  of  the  limacosphaera  for  the 
most  part  confirms  the  observations  of  Simroth  (1908, 
1914).  His  assumption  that  muscular  cells  are  present 
within  the  deutoconcha  is  substantiated. 

The  prolific  mucus  secretion  of  the  entire  deutoconcha, 
as  well  as  its  large  size  may  serve  as  defensive  mechanisms 
against  carnivorous  planktonic  groups  like  copepods  or 
krill. 

The  shell  size  of  hatching  larvae  can  only  be  inter- 
preted from  the  embryonic  and  the  larval  shell  (figure 
8).  There  are  two  possibilities.  The  normal  case  would 
be  that  the  embryo  hatches  shortly  after  the  Ijeginning 
of  growth  lines  (the  mantle  becomes  free  from  the  shell) 


(figure  9,  arrow).  This  happens  after  0.8  whorls  and  a 
diameter  of  the  shell  of  0.65  mm. 

The  second  possibility  is  that  the  embryo  does  not 
hatch  before  reaching  1.4  whorls  (with  spiral  threads). 
The  shell  then  has  a  diameter  of  1.5  mm.  To  reach  this 
size  the  embryo  v\ould  have  to  feed  on  extra  yolk. 

It  is  proposed  that  the  embryo  hatches  when  the  shell 
has  reached  1.4  whorls.  At  this  time  tlie  spiral  threads 
disappear.  This  is  probably  the  consequence  of  the  man- 
tle fusing  above  the  shell.  There  is  no  difference  in  sculp- 
ture between  the  subsequent  part  of  the  larval  shell  and 
the  teleoconch  of  the  investigated  species  of  Marseniop- 
sis. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

Tliis  study  was  carried  out  with  financial  support  of  the 
Deutsche  Forschungsgemeinschaft  (DFG)  in  the  frame 
of  the  Antarctis-research  grant  and  science  grant  Ba  675/ 
6-1  We  have  been  greatly  aided  by  our  colleagues  of 
the  Alfred-Wegener-Institut  (Brenierhaven),  Zoological 
and  Geological-Paleontological  departments  of  the  Uni- 
versity of  Hamburg.  We  are  grateful  to  Dr.  T.  Stadler 
who  carried  out  the  gel-electrophoresis  analysis.  Dr.  M. 
G.  Harasewych  greatly  improved  st\le  and  grammar  of 
the  manuscript. 

To  all  persons  and  institutions  involved,  we  express 
our  sincere  thanks. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Adam,  H.  and  G,  C^lzihak  1964  Arbeilsniethoden  der  mak- 
roskopischen  Anatomie.  Ein  Laboratoriumshandbuch  fiir 
Biologen,  Mediziner  und  technische  Hilfskrafte.  Gustav 
Fischer  Verlag,  Stuttgart,  583  p. 

Boysen-Ennen,  E  1987  Zur  Verbreitung  des  Meso-  und  Mak- 
rozooplankton.s  im  Oberflachenwasser  der  Weddell  See 
(Anlarktis)   Berichte  zur  Polarforschung  35:1-126 

Fretter,  V.  and  A,  Graham.  1962.  British  prosobranch  mol- 
luscs. Ray  Society,  London.  7.55  p. 

Hagen,  W.  1988.  Zur  Bedeutungder  Lipide  im  antarktischen 
Zooplanktnn.  Berichte  zur  Polarforschung  49:1-129 

Jevdonin,  L.  A.  and  J.  S.  Minichev.  1975.  Adaptations  of 
pelagic  gastropods.  Malacological  Review  11:75 

Mileikovsky,  S.  A.  1971.  Types  of  larval  development  in  ma- 
rine bottom  invertebrates,  their  distribution  and  ecological 
significance:  a  re-evahiation.  Marine  Biology  10:193-213. 

Pelseneer,  P  1903  Resultats  du  vo\age  du  S  Y.  "Belgica" 
1897-1899.  Rapports  Sci.  Zoologie,  Mollusques  (Amphi- 
neures,  Gasteropodes  et  Lamellibranches)   Anvers,  85  p. 

I'lalkovvski,  L'.  1987.  Zoogeographische  Untersuchungen  und 
Gemeinschaftsanalysen  an  antarktischem  Makroplankton. 
Berichte  zur  Polarforschung  34:1-138. 

Picken,  (;  B  1980.  Reproductive  adaptations  of  Antarctic 
benthic  invertebrates.  Biological  Journal  of  the  Linnean 
Society  1467-75. 

Ronieis.  B.  1968.  Mikroskopische  Technik.  Oldenbourg  Ver- 
lag, Mijnchen,  16.  .\uOage,  7.57  p. 

Simroth,  H.  1908.  Gastropodenlaiche  \ind  Gastropodenlarven 
der  Deutschen  Tiefsee-Expedition  In:  C  Chun  (ed).  Wis- 
senschaftl  Ergebnisse  der  Deutschen  Tiefsee-Expedition 


Page  8 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


auf  dem  Dampfer  -Valdivia'  1898-1899,  Band  IX:365-  Tiemann,  H    and  K  -H    Bctz     1979     Elutriation:  theoretical 

,,Q  considerations  and  methodological  improvements  Marine 

Simroth    H      1914.     Pelagische  Gastropodenlarven  der  deut-  ecology.  Progress  Series  1277-281. 

schen  Siidsee-Expedition  1901-1903.  /;i:  Drygalski,  E.v  Voss,  J.     1988     Zoogeographie  and  Gemeinschaftsanalyse  des 

(Hrsg.).  Deutsche  Sudpolar-Expedition,  Zoologie  Band  VII  Makrozoobenthos  des  Weddellmeeres  (Antarktisj.  Berich- 

15143-160.  '''  ^"''  Polarforschung  45:1-14.5. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107  1    9-13.  1993 


Page  9 


The  Reproclucti\  e  Anatom\  of  Philomijcus  sellatus  Hubricht.  1972 
and  Philomijcus  virginicus  Hubricht.  1953  (Gastropoda: 
Philom\cidae) 


H.  Lee  Fairbanks 

Penns\l\ ania  State  Universits- 
Monaca.  PA  15061  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Specimens  of  Philomycus  sellatus  and  P  virginicus  were  col- 
lected at  or  near  their  t>  pe  localities.  Their  reproducti\  e  anat- 
om\  is  described  and  compared  with  that  of  other  species  of 
Philomycus.  The  penial  anatom\  of  P  sellatus  is  unique  in 
ha\ing  two  constrictions  in  the  penial  wall;  P  virginicus  is 
distinguished  by  a  circular  pustulose  ridge  that  separates  the 
distal  penis  from  its  atrial  opening. 

Key  Words:  SloUusca;  Gastrojxxla;  landsnail:  slug;  Philomy- 
cldap:  Philornvcj'-    reproductive  anatomy 


LVTRODUCTION 

.\1]  species  of  the  terrestrial  slug  family  Philomycidae 
ha\e  a  mantle  that  co\ers  the  entire  bod>  of  the  slug. 
Three  genera  of  this  family.  Philomycus.  Pallifera.  and 
Megapallifera.  occur  in  the  United  States,  with  most 
species  being  limited  to  the  eastern  and  south-central 
areas  of  the  country .  Few  original  descriptions  pro\ide 
anatomical  data.  Neither  the  description  of  Philomycus 
virginicus  Hubricht.  195.3  nor  of  P.  sellatus  Hubricht, 
1972  discusses  or  figures  an>  part  of  the  reproductive 
anatomy.  Based  up>on  the  mande  pattern.  Hubricht  19721 
compared  Philomycus  sellatus  to  P  ccirolinianus  Bosc. 
1S02!.  but  made  no  comparisons  between  P.  virginicus 
and  other  species  of  Philomycus.  References  to  the  re- 
producti\e  anatomy  of  P.  virginicus  are  limited  to  two 
articles  by  Branson  il96S.  1969;  that  compared  P.  vir- 
ginicus with  P.  bisdosus  Branson.  196S.  Neither  contain 
figures  or  measurements.  The  reproductive  anatomy  of 
P.  sellatus  has  not  pre\iousl\-  been  studied. 

The  goals  of  the  present  study  were  to  describe  the 
anatomy  of  the  reproductive  systems  of  Philomycus  vir- 
ginicus and  P.  sellatus.  and  to  compare  them  with  those 
of  other  sp>ecies  of  Philomycus. 

METHODS  AND  MATERI.ALS 

Sf)ecimens  of  Philomycus  virginicus  were  collected  on 
19  May  19S9  near  nulepost  47  north  of  Skyline  Drive. 
Shenandoah  National  Park,  Madison  County ,  \irginia. 


under  the  loose  bark  of  logs  and  dead  trees,  eleiation 
appro.ximately  1110  meters.  This  station  was  approxi- 
mately O.S  kilometers  east  of  the  tvpe  locafity  for  this 
species.  Specimens  of  P.  sellatus  were  collected  on  17 
May  19S9  from  its  t>p)e  locahty  (2.7  kilometers  northeast 
of  Princeton,  along  Highwa>  65.  Jackson  County .  .Ala- 
bama; in  beede  galleries  in  rotten  logs,  elevation  ap>- 
pro.ximateK  215  meters.  For  comjjarative  purposes,  the 
following  sp>ecie5  were  also  e.xamined:  P.  carolinianus 
collected  in  Berkele>  Cotmty .  South  Carolina  approxi- 
mateK  2-5  kilometers  from  Charleston,  the  designated 
t>pe  iocaht)  ,Pilsbry,  1945:754;  on  22  June  19SS;  P. 
bisdosus  collected  from  Breaks  Interstate  Park.  Dick- 
enson Coimty.  Virginia  the  type  locahty  on  22  May 
1987:  P.  flexuolaris  collected  from  Breaks  Interstate  Park, 
Dickenson  County.  Virginia  on  22  Ma>  1987:  and  P. 
togatus  collected  near  Riceville.  PittsyKania  County, 
Virginia  on  20  May  1987. 

External  characteristics  of  the  specimens  were  com- 
pared with  the  original  sp)ecies  descriptions  to  ensure 
correct  identification.  All  specimens  were  drowned  in 
distdled  water  and  dissected  immediately.  The  repro- 
ducti\  e  sy  stems  were  removed  and  the  atrium  and  penis 
opened  to  examine  their  internal  anatom\ .  Subsequendy 
all  material  was  preserved  in  70"^  ethanol.  DrowTiings 
and  dissections  were  conducted  during  the  month  of  Jvme 
in  each  >  ear  to  reduce  any  differences  that  may  be  at- 
tributable to  the  stage  of  the  life  c>cle.  The  sjjecimens 
were  maintained  in  terraria  for  approximately  two  weeks 
prior  to  dissection. 

E^ch  complete  reproductive  system  was  spread  out  in 
a  f)etri  dish  and  then  projected-  \ia  an  overhead  projector, 
and  traced.  The  p>enial  figures  are  tracings  of  photo- 
graphic shdes  of  the  opened  organs.  Voucher  sp>ecimens 
have  been  deposited  in  the  Academ\-  of  Natural  Sciences, 
Philadelphia  ANSP  .Al>326  for  Philomycus  bisdosus, 
.ANSP  A1S327  for  P  virginicus.  ANSP  A13328  for  P. 
sellatus,  and  .ANSP  Al-3329  for  P.  carolinianus}. 

RESULTS 

Four  adult  specimens  each  of  Philomycus  sellatus  and 
of  P.  virginicus  were  collected  and  used  in  the  studv. 


Page  10 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No   1 


/ 


Figures  1-4.  Mantle  patterns  of  living  slugs.  1,  2.  Philomtjcus 
virginicus  3,  4.  Philomtjcus  sellatiis.  Scale  bar  =  20  mm. 

External  characteristics  of  all  four  specimens  of  each 
species  (figures  1-4)  agreed  with  their  type  descriptions. 
The  gross  reproductive  anatomy  was  similar  for  all  spec- 
imens of  a  species.  Measurements  of  selected  reproduc- 
tive organs  are  shown  in  Table  1. 

Genitalia  of  Phibmycus  sellatus  Hubricht,  1972 
(figures  6,  8) 

Atrium  glandular  on  distal  half  of  outer  surface,  length 
approximately  60'/o  penial  length.  Vagina  length  ap- 
pro.ximately  10%  of  penis.  Spermathecal  duct  approxi- 
mately same  diameter  as  free  oviduct,  length  nearly  twice 
that  of  free  oviduct,  slight  taper  toward  spermatheca. 
Spermatheca  round.  Dart  sac  (with  dart)  larger  than 
spermatheca.  Penis  diameter  at  proximal  end  nearly  equal 
to  atrial  diameter,  gradual  taper  to  diameter  of  vas  de- 
ferens at  distal  end;  penial  sheath  covers  approximateK 


Figures  5,  6.  Genitalia,  5.  Philornycus  virginicus.  6.  Philo- 
mtjcus sellatus.  Scale  bar  =  10  mm.  A:  atrium,  AG;  albumen 
gland,  AR:  accessory  retractor,  DS:  dart  sac,  FO:  free  oviduct, 
G:  gonad,  GP:  genital  pore,  HD;  hermaphroditic  duct,  P:  penis, 
PR:  penial  retractor,  S:  spermatheca,  \':  vagina,  \'D:  vas  de- 
ferens. 

90%  of  penis.  InternalK ,  distal  third  of  penis  with  several 
thin  low  folds,  separated  from  remainder  of  penis  by 
constriction  in  penial  wall;  middle  third  with  3-4  large 
pustulose  ridges;  proximal  third  with  several  thin  non- 
pustulose  folds,  separated  from  middle  third  b\  constric- 
tion in  penial  wall.  Vas  deferens  enters  distal  end  of  penis, 
length  approximately  four  times  that  of  penis;  diameter 
of  middle  third  half  that  of  ends.  Penial  retractor  muscle 
maximum  width  2-3  times  diameter  of  distal  end  of 
penis,  length  40%  of  penis.  Accessory  retractor  muscle 
present,  located  on  outer  wall  of  atrium  near  its  junction 
with  penis. 

Genitalia  of  Philornijcus  virginicm  Hubricht,  1953 
(figures  5,  7) 

Atrium  length  approximately  equal  to  that  of  penis,  ex- 
ternal surface  of  distal  half  glandular.  Base  of  penis  bulg- 
es into  atrium.  N'agina  short,  approximateK  15%  of  penial 
length.  Spermathecal  duct  diameter  greater  than  that  of 
free  oviduct,  slight  taper  toward  spermatheca.  Sperma- 
theca round.  Dart  sac  (with  dart)  smaller  than  sperma- 
theca. Penis  straight,  basal  diameter  one  third  of  length, 
slight  taper  to  junction  with  vas  deferens;  penial  sheath 
reaches  to  junction  of  penis  with  vas  deferens.  Internally, 


H.  L.  Fairbanks,  1993 


Page  11 


Figures  7,  8.  Internal  penial  anatomy.  7.  Philomycus  virgin- 
iciis.  8.  Philomycus  setlatus.  Scale  bar  =  10  mm.  Cut  surfaces 
indicated  by  oblique  lines  in  all  drawings.  A;  atrium,  DS:  dart 
sac,  P:  penis,  PR:  penial  retractor,  PS;  penial  sheath,  VD:  vas 
deferens. 


penis  with  4-6  pustulose  ridges,  a  basal  pustulose  circular 
ridge  sets  off  distal  parts  of  the  penis  from  its  opening 
into  the  atrium.  Vas  deferens  encircles  distal  end  of  penis, 
entering  penis  terminally.  Vas  deferens  length  approxi- 


Figures  9,  10.  Genitalia  9.  Philomycus  bisdosus.  Scale  bar  = 
10  mm.  10.  Philomycus  carolinianus.  Scale  bar  =  5  mm.  A: 
atrium,  AG:  albumen  gland,  .\R  accessory  retractor,  DS:  dart 
sac,  FO:  free  oviduct,  G:  gonad,  GP:  genital  pore,  HD:  her- 
maphroditic duct,  P:  penis,  PR:  penial  retractor,  S:  spermathe- 
ca,  V:  vagina,  YD:  vas  deferens. 

mate!)  3.3  times  that  of  penis,  approximately  same  di- 
ameter throughout  its  length.  Penial  retractor  muscle 
maximum  width  one  third  that  of  diameter  of  distal  end 
of  penis  but  broader  at  its  distal  end,  length  approxi- 
mately one  third  that  of  penis.  Accessory  retractor  muscle 
absent  or  not  distinguishable  from  typical  connective 
tissues. 


Table  I.    Measurements  (mm)  of  selected  reproductive  organs  of  species  of  Philomycus.  Means  with  std.  deviation  and  ranges  are 


P. 

sella  t  us 

(4)* 

P. 
virginicus 

(4)* 

carolinianus 

(5)* 

P. 
bisdosus 

(2)* 

flexuolaris 

(2)* 

P. 
togatus 

(2)* 

Length  of 
penis 

13.1(1.82) 
11.0-14.2 

5.8  (0.66) 
5.4-6.8 

6.0(0.61) 
5.4-7.0 

7,1  (0,00) 
7.1 

7.3  (0.35) 
7.0-7.5 

12.9  (2.33) 
11.2-14.5 

Diameter  of 
penis  (atrial 
end) 

Length  of 
vagina 

4.4(0.49) 
4.1-5.0 

3.7(1.07) 
2.7-5.0 

2.2(0.29) 
1.9-2.7 

3.0  (0.07) 
2.9-3.0 

2.8(0.64) 
2.3-3.2 

3.3  (0.42) 
3.0-3.6 

1.2(0.15) 
1.0-1.3 

0,8  (0.29) 
0.5-10 

1,5(0,41) 
1.1-2.2 

1.1  (0.49) 
0.7-1.4 

1.6(0.35) 
1.3-1.8 

3.1(1.70) 
1.9-4.3 

Length  of 
free  oviduct 

8.8(1.50) 
7.8-10.5 

10.2(1.87) 
8.9-12.9 

7.7(1.44) 
6.2-10.0 

7.6(0.62) 
6.9-8.1 

7.6  (0.64) 
7,1-8.0 

7.2(0.28) 
7.0-7.4 

Length  of 
\as  tleferens 

57.5(4.77) 
52.0-60.5 

21.1  (2.11) 
1 8  8-23  0 

38.1  (4.96) 
33,8-45,1 

19.1  (1.02) 
17.9-19.8 

24.2  (3.04) 
22  0-26  3 

34.0(0.71) 
335-345 

*  Number  ot  specimens  measured. 


Page  U 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


Figures  1 1,  12.  Internal  penial  anatomy.  1 1.  Philomyctis  bis- 
dosus.  Scale  bar  =  10  mm.  12.  Philomycus  caroliniantis.  Scale 
bar  =  5  mm.  A:  atrium,  DS:  dart  sac,  P:  penis,  PR:  penial 
retractor,  PS:  penial  sheath,  VD:  vas  deferens. 


DISCUSSION 

When  Hubricht  (1972)  described  Philomycus  sellatus, 
he  noted  that,  based  upon  the  posterior  half  of  the  mantle, 
it  ".  .  .is  most  closely  related  to  P.  carolinianus  (Bosc).", 
with  which  "It  sometimes  occurs.  .  .".  However,  the  black 
transverse  band  near  the  anterior  end  of  the  mantle  of 
F.  sellatus  (figures  3,  4),  which  is  not  present  on  P. 
carolinianus  (Pilsbry,  1948  p. 748),  easily  separates  the 
two  species  in  the  field.  Their  reproductive  systems  (fig- 
ures 6,  10)  are  also  distinct.  The  shape  of  the  penes  and 
their  internal  anatomies  (figures  8,  12)  are  clearly  dif- 
ferent, Philomycus  carolinianus  lacks  the  two  internal 
constrictions  in  the  penial  wall  that  are  found  in  P.  sel- 
latus, and  the  internal  penial  pilasters  are  smaller  and 
more  numerous  in  P.  carolinianus  than  in  P.  sellatus. 
Additionally,  the  penis  and  vas  deferens  of  P.  sellatus 
are  nearly  twice  as  long  as  those  of  P.  carolinianus  (Table 
1).  Indeed,  the  black  anterior  transverse  band  on  the 
mantle  and  the  two  constrictions  in  the  penial  wall  are 
characteristics  unique  to  P.  sellatus. 

Hubricht  (1953)  noted  that  Philomycus  virginicus  was 
found  associated  with  P.  flexuolaris  (Rafinesque,  1820) 
and  P.  togatus  (Gould,  1841)  (as  P.  carolinianus  collinus 


in  Hubricht's  1953  article).  Among  these  ta.\a,  only  P. 
virginicus  has  the  transverse  chevron  pattern  on  the  man- 
tle (figures  1,  2)  and  is  thus  easily  separated  from  the 
others  in  the  field.  In  addition,  measurements  of  the 
reproductive  systems  of  P.  flexuolaris  and  P.  togatus 
demonstrated  several  differences  from  that  of  P.  virgin- 
icus (Table  1).  The  penis  and  vagina  of  P.  virginicus  are 
shorter  than  those  of  P.  flexuolaris;  the  free  oviduct  of 
P.  virginicus  is  much  longer  than  that  of  P.  flexuolaris. 
Philomycus  togatus  has  a  much  longer  penis,  vagina, 
and  vas  deferens  than  P.  virginicus;  the  free  oviduct  of 
P.  virginicus  is  longer  than  that  of  P.  togatus  (Table  1). 
Branson  (1968),  in  reference  to  P.  virginicus  and  P. 
bisdosus  (figures  5,  9),  stated  that  "The  genitalia  of  the 
two  species  also  differ.",  but  no  figures  nor  measurements 
were  included.  Branson  (1969)  listed  some  differences 
between  the  reproductive  anatomies  of  these  latter  two 
species,  but  again  without  figures  or  measurements.  Fig- 
ures 7  and  11  show  clearly  the  differences  in  the  shape 
of  the  penis  and  the  internal  penial  anatomy  of  these 
two  species,  and  the  free  oviduct  of  P.  virginicus  is  nearly 
1.5  times  the  length  of  the  P.  bisdosus  oviduct  (Table 
1 ).  In  addition,  P.  bisdosus  lacks  the  anterior  to  posterior 
transverse  chevrons  on  the  mantle.  Comparisons  with 
previous  studies  of  reproductive  anatomv  in  species  of 
Philomycus  (Fairbanks,  1986,  1989;  Pilsbry,  1948)  con- 
firmed that  the  internal  surface  of  the  penis  of  P.  vir- 
ginicus is  unique  in  having  a  basal  circular  pustulose 
ridge  at  the  atrial  end. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Financial  support  for  the  field  trips  associated  \\  ith  this 
study  was  provided  by  grants  from  the  Research  De- 
velopment Grant  Fund  of  The  Pennsylvania  State  Uni- 
versity. My  thanks  go  to  three  anonymous  reviewers  who 
provided  valuable  suggestions  for  improving  this  article. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bosc,  L.  A.  G.  1802.  Histoire  naturelle  des  coquilles.  Conten- 
ant  leur  description,  et  leurs  moeurs.  \'ol.  I.  Paris,  343  p., 
Ipl. 

Branson.  B.  A.  1968.  Two  new  slugs  (Pulmonata:  Philomy- 
cidae:  Philomycus)  from  Kentuck\  and  X'irginia.  The 
Nautilus  81(4):127-133. 

Branson,  B.  A  1969.  Genital  differences  in  Philomycus  vir- 
ginicus Hubricht  and  P  bisdosus  Branson.  The  Nautilus 
82:74, 

Fairbanks,  H.  L.  1986.  The  taxonomic  status  of  Philomycus 
togatus  (Pulmonata:  Philomycidae):  a  morphological  and 
electrophoretic  comparison  with  Philomycus  carolini- 
anus. Malacologia  27(2):271-280, 

Fairbanks,  H,  L.  1989,  The  reproducti\e  anatoms  and  tax- 
onomic status  of  Philomycus  vcniislus  Hubricht,  1953  and 
Philomycus  bisdosus  Branson,  1968  (Pulmonata:  Philo- 
mycidae), The  Nautilus  103(I):20-23, 

Gould,  A,  A,  1841.  Report  on  the  invertebrates  of  Massachu- 
setts, comprising  the  MoUusca,  Crustacea,  Annelida  and 
Radiata,  vol.  3. 


H.  L.  Fairbanks,  1993 


Page  13 


Hubricht,  L.  1953^  Three  new  species  of  Philomycidae^  The 
Nautilus  66(3):78-80. 

Hubricht,  L.  1972,  Two  new  North  American  Puimonata: 
Paravitrea  seradens  and  Philomycus  sellatus^  The  Nau- 
tilus 86(1):16-17. 

Pilsbry,  H.  A.    1948.    Land  MoUusca  of  North  America  (North 


of  Mexico).  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Phila- 
delphia Monograph  Number  3, Vol, II  Part  2:759. 
Rafinesque,  C.  S.    1820.    .Annals  of  Nature  or  annual  synopsis 
of  new  genera  and  species  of  animals  and  plants  discovered 
in  North  America,  p.  10. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(l):14-23,  1993 


Page  14 


Two  Confusing  Indo-Pacific  Cerithiids 


Richard  S.  Houbrick 

Department  of  linertebrate  Zoology 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC.  20560 


ABSTRACT 

Cerithium  zebrum  Kiener,  1841  and  Cerithium  boeticum  Pease, 
1860.  although  originally  described  as  CerUhiiim  species,  had 
been  allocated  to  Bittium  Gray,  1847,  in  the  recent  literature 
Anatomical  investigation  has  shown  that  these  two  species  do 
not  have  the  characters  of  Bitlium  species,  but  are  are  more 
like  Cerithium  taxa,  e.xcept  for  their  small  size.  Cerithium 
zebrum  is  distinguished  from  Cerithium  boeticum.  based  on 
morphological  characters  derived  from  the  shell,  radula  and 
soft  anatomy.  Synonymies,  descriptions  and  a  discussion  of  the 
differences  between  the  species  are  presented. 

Key  Words:  Cerithium,  Bittium,  morphology,  anatomy,  tax- 
onomy. 


INTRODUCTION 

Small-shelled  cerithiids  are  difficult  to  identify  to  the 
species-level,  particularly  poorly-known  taxa  from  the 
Indo-Pacific  region.  Generic  and  sometimes  familial  de- 
terminations of  these  small  snails  are  likewise  difficult 
and  controversal,  and  in  most  museum  collections  many 
small-sized  cerithiids  are  grouped  together  and  loosely 
attributed  to  the  genus  Bittium  Gray,  1847. 

During  a  recent  generic  review  of  the  Bittium-gToup 
the  anatomy  of  a  number  of  "Bittium"  species  were 
examined.  One  of  the  taxa  studied  is  "Bittium"  zebrum 
(Kiener,  1841),  a  common  species  throughout  the  Indo- 
Pacific  region  that  is  extremely  variably  in  sculpture  and 
color  pattern.  As  expected  in  a  common,  widely-distrib- 
uted species  comprising  many  sculptural  phenotypes  and 
color  morphs," Bittium  '  zebrum  has  been  zealously  ov- 
ernamed  by  authors,  as  a  perusal  of  its  synonymy  will 
testify. 

When  living  "Bittium"  zebrum  specimens  from  Guam, 
Enewetak,  and  Hawaii  were  examined  it  was  discovered 
that  none  of  these  snails  had  an  epipodial  skirt,  charac- 
teristic of  members  of  Bittiinae.  Moreover,  there  was  no 
spermatophore  bursa  present  in  the  lateral  lamina  of  the 
pallial  oviduct,  a  feature  distinctive  of  the  Bittium-group. 
These  animals  are  thus  transferred  from  Bittitim  to  Cer- 
ithium Briiguiere. 

Further  comparison  of  the  Hawaiian  specimens  of 


"Bittium"  zebrum  with  those  from  other  Indo-Pacific 
regions  revealed  that  there  are  considerable  morpholog- 
ical differences  between  the  populations:  the  shells,  rad- 
ula and  anatomy  of  the  Hawaiian  specimens  are  quite 
distinct  from  those  of  zebrum  specimens  from  elsewhere. 
Subsequent  careful  examination  of  many  museum  lots 
of  Cerithium  zebrum  revealed  that  most  lots  of  Hawaiian 
specimens  comprised  mixtures  of  two  species:  the  first 
having  a  typical  zebrum  phenotype,  and  the  second, 
more  common,  species  having  a  different  shell  physi- 
ognomy. It  became  apparent  that  the  second  species  is 
Cerithium  boeticum  Pease,  1860,  named  from  the  Ha- 
waiian Islands  and  subsequently  considered  to  be  con- 
specific  with  "Bittium"  zebrum  by  Kay  (1979). 

This  paper  addresses  the  differences  between  the  two 
species,  describes  and  presents  a  s\  nonymx  of  each,  and 
delineates  the  characters  separating  and  distinguishing 
them.  Cerithium  boeticum  is  recognized  as  a  valid  spe- 
cies, different  from  Cerithium  zebrum,  and  is  shown  to 
be  endemic  to  the  Hawaiian  Islands. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Living  specimens  of  Cerithium  zebrum  were  studied  at 
Enewetak  Atoll,  Marshall  Islands,  and  at  the  L^niversity 
of  Guam  Marine  Laboratory  at  Pago  Bay,  Guam.  Cer- 
ithium boeticum  was  collected  from  shallow,  subtidal 
coral  rubble  in  Kewalo  Basin,  Honolulu,  placed  in  aquar- 
ia and  observed  at  the  Kewalo  Laboratorx  of  the  Ha- 
waiian Biomedical  Research  Laboratory,  University  of 
Hawaii,  Honolulu,  Hawaii.  Both  species  were  observed 
and  dissected  under  water  in  wax-filled  petri  dishes  using 
a  Wild  M-5  dissecting  microscope.  Methylene  blue  was 
used  to  enhance  anatomical  features  during  dissection. 
Protoconchs,  shells,  opercula  and  radulae  were  studied 
with  an  Hitachi  S-570  scanning  electron  microscope.  The 
types  of  both  species  and  their  synonymous  nomina  were 
examined  and  are  discussed  below.  Man\-  museum  lots 
were  examined  in  order  to  establish  the  range  of  phe- 
notypic  variation  in  the  shells  of  each  species.  Measure- 
ments and  meristic  data  of  shells  were  taken  using  ran- 
domly selected  specimens  from  locations  throughout  the 
geographic  range  of  each  species. 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1993 


Page  15 


Material  examined:  Cerithiitm  hocticum.  HAWAIIAN 
ISLANDS:  (USNM  343522);  Oaliu  (USNM  12916,  types); 
Honolulu,  Oahu  (USNM  335496,  335499,  335497,  335498, 
767506);  Waikiki  Marine  Lab,  Honolulu,  Oahu  (USNM 
633002);  Kewalo  Basin,  Honolulu,  Oahu  (USNM  857099); 
Honolulu  Reef,  Oahu  (USNM  335289);  Quarantine  Is- 
land, Honolulu,  Oahu  (USNM  339349,  339342);  Waikiki, 
Oahu  (USNM  343514,  343515,  343519);  off  Waikiki,  Ho- 
nolulu, Oahu  (USNM  339118);  Kewalo  Basin,  Honolulu, 
Oahu,  Hawaii  (USNM  857099);  Diamond  Head,  Hono- 
lulu, Oahu  (USNM  339339,  343510);  Mokapu  Beach, 
Oahu  (USMN  484570);  Maunalua  Beach,  Oahu  (USNM 
428173,  428174,  428207,  343520,  343511);  Mokoloe  Is- 
land, Oahu  (USNM  339343,  343512);  Kaneohe  Bay,  Oahu 
(USNM  472057,  472058,  343513);  Coconut  Island,  Ka- 
neohe Bay,  Oahu  (USNM  771362,  771556);  Hospital  Point, 
Pearl  Harbor,  Oahu  (I'SNM  497938);  Pearl  Harbor,  Oahu 
(USNM  484455,  428234,  341308);  Pupukea  Beach,  Oahu 
(USNM  484689);  Kahana  Bav,  Oahu  (USNM  777967); 
Kahala,  Oahu  (USNM  33951,  339928);  Kahala  Beach, 
Koko  Head,  Oahu  (USNM  343546);  Keoke  River,  Hawaii 
(USNM  252339,  252338,  252336);  Keokea,  Hawaii  (USNM 
337592);  Keokea,  Hilo,  Hawaii  (USNM  339340,  339340); 
Hilo.  Hawaii  (USNM  612281);  Kuhio  B.,  Hilo,  Hawaii 
(USNM  339125);  Honaunau,  Hawaii  (USNM  343517);  5 
mi  SW  Kapoho,  Hawaii  (USNM  409081,  409095);  Lanai 
(USNM  612425);  Mauele,  Lanai  (USNM  339341);  Han- 
alei,  Kauai  (USNM  340692);  Midway  Island  (USNM 
790897,  790898);  Frigate  Point,  Sand  Island  (USNM 
678064). 

Cerithiumzebriim.  MAURITIUS:  (USNM  91247,  91069, 
91070);  Flicq-en-Flacq,  Arsenal  Bay  (USNM  716523). 
SEYCHELLES:  Aldabra  Atoll,  lie  Picard  (USNM  837490). 
COCOS  (KEELING)  ISLANDS:  Alor  Pinvu,  NW  side  of 
West  Island  (USNM  656435).  AUSTRALIA:  Heron  Is- 
land, Queensland  (USNM  8540174);  Watson's  Bav,  Liz- 
ard Island,  Queensland  (USNM  783381).  RYUKYU  IS- 
LANDS: Osima,  Osumi  (USNM  343873);  Odomaria, 
Okinawa,  Shima  (USNM  488199);  Yenoshima  (USNM 
228222);  Chichyima,  Ogasawara  (USNM  175587).  BO- 
NIN  ISLANDS: '(USNM  36950,  343874).  PHILIPPINES: 
Jamelo  Bav,  Luzon  (USNM  935351).  MARIANAS:  Saipan 
(USNM  486824,  486823,  486795);  Guam  (USNM  851 104, 
851104);  Pago  Bay,  Guam  (USNM  774778);  Apra  Bay, 
Guam  (USNM  240110);  Orote  Point,  Orote  Cliffs,  Guam 
(USNM  854036).  CAROLINES:  Moen  Island,  Truk  La- 
goon (USNM  842615);  Reef  at  Mutunlik,  Kusaie  Island 
(USNM  609487).  LOYALTY  ISLANDS:  (USNM  253564); 
Lifu  (USNM  423278,  423260,  423210,  423282,  423281, 
423261,  423325,  423283).  FIJI:  Rat  Tail  Passage,  Suva 
Reef  (USNM  824808);  SAMOA:  Pago  Pago  (USNM 
361535,  361536);  Ofu,  Manu'a  Group  (USNM  380968, 
380965,  380967,  380969,  380962,  380963,  380960, 
380966).  MARSHALL  ISLANDS:  Enewetak  (USNM 
432415,  770725,  542726);  Rennit  Island,  Enewetak 
(USNM  542809);  Fred,  Enewetak  (USNM  770687);  Aa- 
raanbiru  Island,  Enewetak  (USNM  582227,  582265);  Tei- 
teiripucoki  Island,  Enewetak  (USNM  581543);  Girunien 
Island,  Enewetak  (USNM  581534);  Engebi  Island,  Enew- 


etak (USNM  743869);  Rijoru  Island,  Enewetak  (USNM 
581555);  E.  Rigili  Island,  Enewetak  (USNM  581923); 
between  Rigili  and  E.  Rigili  Islands  (USNM  581576, 
581575);  Ailuk  Island,  Ailuk  Atoll  (USNM  615133);  Lae 
Island,  Lae  Atoll  (USNM  614896);  Bock  Island,  Rongerik 
(USNM  594660);  Enwertok,  Rongerik  (USNM  583519); 
4  mi.  W  Bikini  Islands  (USNM  586086);  Bikini  (USNM 
583949,  585185);  Bokororvuru,  Bikini  (USNM  583883, 
583884);  Namu  Island,  Bikini  (USNM  580542);  Enyu 
Island,  Bikini  (USNM  580945);  Eninman  Island,  Bikini 
(USNM  586897);  Pigenivarayro,  Rongelap  (USNM 
585588,  585327);  Kabelle  Island,  Rongelap  (USNM 
582405,  582388,  582125,  Burok,  Rongelap  (USNM 
583989);  NIUE:  Opaahi,  S.  of  Alofi  (USNM  854054);  Alofi 
(USNM  854046);  Tuapa  (USNM  858164);  Tuapa,  Avaiki 
Cave  (USNM  854055).  COOK  ISLANDS:  Mauke  Island 
(USNM  598174).  SOCIETY  ISLANDS:  Reao  Id  (USNM 
5573,  holotype);  Makatea,  Tuamotu  Archipelago,  N  Ti- 
mae  Harbor  (USNM  819895);  Arue,  Papeete,  Tahiti 
(USNM  775927);  Mahina,  Tahiti  (USNM  797267,  791372); 
Tahiti  (USNM  91068).  WALLIS  &  FUTUNA  ISLANDS: 
outer  reef  E  of  Nukuhifala  (USNM  676427);  Henderson 
Id  (G.  Pauley  coll.).  NIUE:  off  warf,  Alofi  (USNM  854046); 
Avaiki  Cave,  Tuapa  (USNM  854055);  Tuapa  (USNM 
858167);  Opaahi,  S  Alofi  (USNM  854054).  HAWAII: 
French  Frigate  Shoals  (ANSP  195368,  195384);  Midway 
(USNM  790897);  Honaunau,  Hawaii  (USNM  343509); 
Keokea,  Hilo,  Hawaii  (USNM  339353). 

Abbreviations:  BMNH  =  British  Museum  (Natural  His- 
tory); MNHNP  =  Museum  National  d'Histoire  Naturelle, 
Paris;  NMW  =  National  Museum,  Wales;  SEM  =  scan- 
ning electron  microscope;  USNM  =  United  States  Na- 
tional Museum,  Smithsonian  Institution,  Washington, 
DC. 


RESULTS 

Descriptions  (Tables  1  &  2,  Figs.  1-28),  synonymies,  and 
discussions  of  both  species  are  presented  below,  followed 
by  a  table  identifying  the  characters  separating  the  two 
species  (Table  3). 


Cerithium  zebrum  Kiener,  1841 

Cerithium  zebrum  Kiener,  1841:71,  pi.  25,  fig.  4  (holo- 
tvpe,  MNHNP;  type  locality,  Indian  Ocean,  Mauritius). 
Sowerbv, 1855:875-876,  pi.  183,  figs.  207-209;  1865,  pi. 
19,  fig.  136;  Tryon,  1887:  138,  pi.  26,  figs.  78-82;  Kobelt, 
1898:210-211,  pi.  39,  figs.  7-10;  Hedley,  1899:434;  Vignal, 
1903:21-22,  pi.  2,  fig.  1;  Schepman,  1909:162;  Dautzen- 
berg  &  Bouge,  1933:313. 

Cerithium  janlhinum  Gould,  1849:121  (holotype,  USNM  5573, 
8.5  X  3.9  mm;  type  loclaity.  Clermont  Tonnere  [Reao  Id, 
Tuamotusj;  1852:152,  pi.  10,  fig.  173a-b;  1862:63;  Johnson, 
1964:95. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  dilectum  C.B.  Adams  in  Sowerby,  1855: 
896,  pi.  33,  fig.  207'  (15  syntypes,  BMNH  1969349;  type 
locality,  Galapagos  [in  error]);  Vignal,  1903:22-23,  pi.  2, 
fig.  5.  ■ 


Page  16 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


R   S.  Houbrick,  1993 


Page  17 


Figs.  16-17.    Scanning  electron  micrographs  of  radula  of  Cerithium  zebrtim  Kiener,  Pago  Bay,  Guam  (USNM  774778);  16.    view 
of  mid-section  of  radula,  bar  =  36  ^m;  17.    half  row  showing  details  of  rachidian,  lateral  and  marginal  teeth,  bar  =  29  ^m. 


Cerithium  delectum  (sic)  A.  Adams.  Sowerbv,  1865,  pi  16,  fig 
112  a-c;  Vignal,  1903:23. 

Cerithium  unilincatum  Pease,  1860:432  (lectot>pe,  BMNH 
19622798,  5.5  x  3  mm,  2  paralectotypes  BMNH  1962799; 
t\  pe  locality.  Sandwich  Ids  [Hawaiian  Ids]).  Sowerbv,  1866, 
pi.  15,  fig.99;  Trvon,  1887:138,  pi.  26,  fig.  86;  Kobelt,  1898: 
224,  pl.29,  fig.  18. 

Cerithium  stigmosum  Gould,  1861:386  (holotype,  ?;  type  lo- 
cahty,  Bonin  Ids)  1862:141;  Johnson,  1964:152. 

Cerithium  aspersum  Deshayes,  1863:97-98,  pi.  11,  figs.  16-18 
(lectotype,  here  selected,  MNHNP,  8.8  mm,  4  paralecto- 
types, MNHNP;  type  locality.  Reunion). 

Cerithium  Crossii  Deshayes,  1863:96,  pi.  11,  figs.  12-14  (lec- 
totype, here  selected,  MNHNP,  8.4  mm,  3  paralectotypes, 
MNHNP;  type  locality.  Reunion;  not  Cerithium  cros- 
seanum  Tiberi,  1863  [=  Cerithioipsis  sulwylindricum 
(Brusina)],  nor  Cerithium  maillardi  Crosse,  1863  [unnec- 
essary replacement  name  for  Cerithium  crosseanum  Ti- 
ber!]. 

Cerithium  dichroum  Melvill  is.  Standen,  1895: 115,  fig.  (6  syn- 
types  NMW  55158200;  type  locality,  Lifu,  Lo\aity  Idsi 


Cerithium  zebrum  var.  pulchra  Vignal,  1903:22,  pi.  2,  fig.  2 
(t>pe,  MNHNP;  type  localit> ,  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cale- 
donia); Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:315. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  trijasciata  N'ignai,  1903:22,  pi.  2,  fig. 

3  (type,  MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cale- 
donia). 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  attenuata  Vignal,  1903:22,  pi.  2,  fig. 

4  (type,  MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cale- 
donia); Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:313. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var  undulata  Dautzenberg  ic  Bouge,  1933: 
316  (Type,  MNHNP;  type  locality,  Tuamotus). 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  rosea  Vignal,  1903:24,  pi.  2,  fig.  6  (type, 
MNHNP;  t\pe  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Caledonia); 
Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:315. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  cinerea  Vignal,  1903:24,  pi.  2,  fig.  7 
(type,  MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cale- 
donia); Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:314. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  nivea  Vignal,  1903:24,  pi.  2,  fig.  8  (type, 
MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Caledonia); 
Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:315. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  biUneata  Vignal,  1903:25,  pi.  2,  fig.  10 


Figs.  1-15.  Cerithium  zebrum  Kiener,  showing  shell  variation  and  types  of  synonymous  nominal  ta.xa.  1-2.  Orote  Point,  Guam, 
7.9  mm  length;  3.  operculum,  1.3  mm  length  (ISNM  854036);  4.  Orote  Point,  Guam,  7.5  mm  length  (USNM  854036);  5.  Pago 
Bay,  Guam,  7.8  mm  length  (USNM  774778);  6.  Enewetak  Atoll,  Marshall  Islands,  7.9  mm  length  (USNM  770725);  7.  lectotype 
of  Cerithium  crossii  Deshayes,  Reunion  (MNHNP),  ;  8.  Holotype  of  Cerithium  janthinum  Gould,  Reao,  Tuamotus  (USNM  5573); 
9.  SEM  of  protoconch,  bar  =  70  ^m;  10.  lectotype  of  Cerithium  aspersum  Deshayes,  Reunion,  8  2  mm  (MNHNP);  11-12.  Pago 
Bay,  Guam,  apertural  and  right  lateral  views  under  SEM,  showing  sculptural  details,  5  8  tnm  length  (I'SNM  774778);  13.  sculpture 
of  early  whorls,  SEM,  bar  =  0.9  mm;  14—15.  Pago  Bav,  Guam,  dorsal  and  right  lateral  views  under  SEM,  5.8  mm  length  (USNM 
774778). 


Page  18 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


Figs.  18-26.  Cerithium  boeticum  Pease,  from  Kewalo  Basin,  Honolulu,  Oahu,  Hawaii,  showing  shell  variabilit)  (USNM  857099). 
18-19.  Strongly  banded  morph,  5.8  mm  length;  20-21.  white  morph,  5.7  mm  length;  22-23.  5.7  mm  length;  24.  scanning 
electron  micrograph  showing  sculptural  details  and  aperture,  4.9  mm  length;  25.  operculum.  2  mm  length;  26.  SEM  of  protoconch 
and  early  whorl  sculpture,  bar  =  88  fzm 


(type,  MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cale- 
donia); Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:314. 

Cerithium  zelyrum  var.  triliyieata  Vignal,  1903:25,  pi.  2,  fig. 
11  (type,  MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cal- 
edonia); Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933315. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  ornata  Vignal,  1903:26,  pi.  2,  fig.  13 
(type,  MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cale- 
donia). 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  sticta  Vignal,  1903:26,  pi.  2,  fig.  14 
(type,  MNHNP;  type  locality,  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cale- 
donia); Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:315. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var  mutimaculata  Vignal,  1903:26,  pi.  2, 
fig.  15  (type,  MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New 
Caledonia);  Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:315. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  maculata  Vignal,  1903:26,  pi.  2,  fig. 


16  (type,  MNHNP;  type  locality.  Isle  of  Pines,  New  Cal- 
edonia); Dautzenberg  &  Bouge,  1933:314. 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  unimacuhita  N'ignal,  1903:27,  pi.  2  fig. 

17  (tspe,  MNHNP;  type  localit\',  isle  of  Pines,  New  Cal- 
edonia). 

Cerithium  zebrum  var.  aspersa  Deshayes.  Dautzenberg  & 
Bouge,  1933:314. 

Bittium  zebrum  (Kiener)  Cernohorsky,  1972:69-70,  pi  14.  fig. 
10;  Salvat  &  Rives,  1975:272,  fig.  74. 

Bittium  zebrum  (Kiener)  Kay,  1979:120,  figs.  45b-c  (not  Bit- 
tium zebrum  (Kiener),  is  Cerithium  boeticum  Pease  1860). 

Description:  Shell  (Figs.  1-15;  Table  1):  tiirreted,  elon- 
gate, attaining  10.4  mm  length,  3.2  mm  width,  and  com- 
prising about  9  weakly  inflated  to  flat-sided  whorls.  Pro- 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1993 


Page  19 


Figs.  27-28.    Scanning  electron  micrographs  of  radula  of  Cerithium  boeticum  Pease,  Kewalo  Basin,  Honolulu,  Oahu,  Hawaii 
(I'SNM  857099).  27.    general  view  of  mid-radular  ribbon,  bar  =  25  ^m;  28.    detail  of  rachidian  tooth,  bar  =  9  nm 


toconch  (Fig  9)  comprising  3  whorls;  protoconch  1  nearly 
smooth,  sculptured  with  suprasutural  spiral  cord;  pro- 
toconch 2  sculptured  with  series  of  subsutural  plaits  fol- 
lowed by  two  strong  spiral  cords,  criss-crossed  by  minute 
lirae  up  to  anterior  suture.  Early  whorls  (Fig.  13)  sculp- 
tured with  3  beaded  spiral  cords.  Adult  whorls  sculptured 
with  4  beaded,  major  spiral  cords  each  separated  from 
one  another  by  one  fine  spiral  lira.  Penultimate  whorl 
with  5  beaded  spiral  cords,  having  about  26  spiral  beads; 
beads  frequently  aligned  to  form  weak  a.xial  riblets.  Body 
whorl  with  11-12  beaded  spiral  cords  and  fine  spiral  lirae. 
Suture  weakly  defined.  Strong  white  varices  randomly 
placed  on  whorls;  largest  varix  on  right  dorsal  side  of 
body  whorl.  Aperture  circular-ovate,  a  little  over  one- 
fourth  the  shell  length.  Outer  lip  thick,  relatixely  smooth, 
weakly  crenulate  at  inner  edge;  columella  concave  with 
weak  callus.  Anterior  canal  short,  but  pronounced,  ori- 
ented at  45  degree  angle  to  shell  a.xis.  Weak  siphonal 
constriction.  Anal  canal  small,  defined  bv  small  parietal 


plait  Shell  color  white  with  pink  early  whorls  and  adult 
w  horls  w  ith  brown,  tan,  rose  blotches  and  spiral  stripes, 
bands,  or  dots.  Aperture  white.  Periostracum  thin,  light 
tan. 

Animal:  Headfoot  white,  flecked  with  opaque  white, 
rose  or  tan.  Snout,  mantle  edge  and  siphon  \ellow .  Mantle 
edge  with  short  yellow  papillae.  Snout  long,  extensible, 
having  bilobed  tip  (lips).  Operculum  (Fig.  3)  tan,  cor- 
neous, ovate,  paucispiral  with  eccentric  nucleus.  Lateral 
epipodial  skirt  and  operculiferous  lobe  absent.  Osphra- 
dium  bipectinate,  with  weakly-defined  pectins.  Radula 
(Figs.  16-17)  short,  about  one-ninth  the  shell  length. 
Rachidian  tooth  (Fig  17)  height  equals  length,  having 
hourglass-shaped  basal  plate  with  spade-shaped  basal 
projection  and  two  small  basal  lateral  butresses;  cutting 
edge  with  large,  pointed  central  cusp  flanked  by  two 
small  pointed  denticles  on  each  side.  Lateral  tooth  with 
rectangular  basal  plate  having  long  lateral  projection  and 


Table  1.   Shell  statistics  for  Cerithium  zcbrum  (measurements 
in  mm) 


Table  2.    Shell  statistics  for  Cerithium  boeticum  (measure- 
ments in  mm). 


Statistic  (n  =  17) 

X 

sd 

Range 

Statistic  (n  =  17) 

X 

sd 

Range 

Length 

7.3 

1.5 

4.2-10.35 

Length 

6.1 

1.8 

2.4-10.5 

Width 

2.4 

0.4 

1.8-3.2 

W^idth 

2.3 

0.8 

1.2-4.6 

Aperture  length 

1.3 

0.3 

0.8-1.8 

Aperture  length 

1,7 

0,7 

0.8-2.4 

Number  of  whorls 

9.2 

1.6 

7-13 

Number  of  whorls 

8,0 

0,9 

6-9 

Number  spiral  beads 

26,3 

6 

19-44 

Xvunber  axial  beads 

174 

1  7 

14-20 

Page  20 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


thick  central  buttress;  cutting  edge  with  one  weak  inner 
denticle,  large  spoon-shaped  cusp,  and  three  outer  den- 
ticles. Marginal  teeth  spatulate,  curved  at  tips;  inner  mar- 
ginal tooth  with  three  pointed  inner  denticles,  large  cen- 
tral cusp  and  two  outer  denticles;  outer  marginal  tooth 
same  but  without  outer  denticles.  Esophageal  gland  pres- 
ent; stomach  large;  style  sac  and  crystalline  style  long, 
about  one-third  stomach  length. 

Synonymic  remarks:  This  species  has  been  the  recipient 
of  23  names,  all  of  which  have  been  based  on  concho- 
logical  characters  and/or  differences  in  shell  pigmenta- 
tion. It  is  obvious  that  the  authors  of  these  nomina  did 
not  employ  a  modern  species  concept  and  failed  to  rec- 
ognize the  full  range  of  intraspecific  variation  when  pro- 
posing these  ta.xa.  Examination  of  the  types  of  the  syn- 
on\mous  nomina  re\ealed  no  significant  differences  in 
shell  sculpture  from  that  of  Cerithium  zebrum  (Kiener); 
indeed,  the  nomina  proposed  by  Vignal  (1903)  as  vari- 
eties of  Cerithium  zebrum  Kiener  were  based  on  mere 
intraspecific  color  variation,  as  Vignal  (1903)  clearly  stat- 
ed. The  holotype  of  Cerithium  janthinum  Gould  (see 
Fig.  8)  is  merely  a  worn,  very  wide  morph  of  Cerithium 
zebrum.  Sowerby  (1855)  introduced  the  name  dilectum 
in  the  Thesaurus  as  a  variety  of  Cerithium  zebrum  Kie- 
ner, but  the  new  taxon  was  indicated  only  by  the  itali- 
cized name  in  his  "Alphabetical  list  of  species",  on  p. 
896.  The  name  dilectum  was  initially  listed  on  p.  117  as 
a  synonym  of  Cerithium  zebrum,  and  the  legend  for  the 
figures  of  Cerithium  zebrum  (figs.  107-109)  does  not 
include  the  name  dilectum,  although  one  of  the  figures 
has  an  asterix  (fig.  207-),  which  presumably  is  meant  to 
indicate  the  varietal  taxon,  dilectum.  Cerithium  asper- 
sum  Deshayes  is  a  highly  sculptured  morph  of  C.  zebrum, 
as  illustrated  by  the  lectotype  (Fig.  10).  Cerithium  crossi 
Deshayes,  1863,  which  as  shown  by  the  lectotype  (Fig. 
7),  is  conspecific  with  Cerithium  zebrum,  was  incorrectly 
considered  by  Crosse  (1863)  as  a  homonym  of  Cerithium 
crosseanum  Tiberi,  1863,  a  Cerithiopsis  species,  and  was 
given  an  unnecessary  replacement  name,  Cerithium 
maillardi  Crosse,  1863.  Cerithium  boeticum  Pease  er- 
roneously has  been  considered  conspecific  with  Ceri- 
thium zebrum  Kiener  by  Kay  (1979).  For  a  discussion 
of  this  issue,  see  the  discussion  under  Cerithium  boeti- 
cum. 

Discussion:  Cerithium  zebrum  is  a  very  common  spe- 
cies, frequently  found  in  the  upper  intertidal  zone  among 
rubble  and  algae  on  benches  and  platforms  associated 
with  fringing  coral  reefs  of  atolls  and  islands  throughout 
the  Indo-Pacific.  In  the  Hawaiian  Islands  is  also  occurs 
in  deeper  waters  (Kay,  pers.  com.).  It  is  characterized 
by  an  elongate,  tapering  shell,  sculptured  with  many  fine 
beaded  spiral  cords  and  with  numerous  broad,  white, 
randomly-placed  varices.  Cerithium  zebrum  is  a  colorful 
species,  having  a  rose-colored  apex  capped  with  a  dark 
brown  protoconch  (see  Figs.  1-2,4,6).  The  adult  whorls 
are  frequently  white  or  light  pink  with  tan  blotches  or 
with  brown  and  tan  bands.  While  the  species  varies  great- 
ly in  color  pattern,  shell  sculpture  is  relatively  stable 


throughout  its  range.  Banded  varieties  of  Cerithium  ze- 
brum may  be  confused  with  banded  morphs  of  Ceri- 
thium boeticum,  but  the  latter  species  has  a  more  coarse- 
ly sculptured  shell  with  stronger  axial  ribs,  a  more  deeply 
incised  suture,  and  a  thick  outer  apertural  lip  (see  Figs. 
18-26).  The  animal  (headfoot),  in  contrast  to  the  brightly 
pigmented  shell,  is  a  uniform  white  overlain  by  opaque 
white  spots,  although  some  shells  may  also  be  white. 

In  contrast  to  the  lecithotrophic  development  seen  in 
Cerithium  boeticum,  Cerithium  zebrum  undergoes  a 
lengthy  planktotrophic  larval  phase  and  has  an  elabo- 
rately sculptured  protoconch  (Fig.  9)  with  a  deep  sinu- 
sigeral  notch  indicative  of  this  de\elopmental  mode.  The 
operculum  of  Cerithium  zebrum  is  slightK-  more  ovate, 
thicker  and  opaque,  and  has  fewer  spirals  than  that  of 
Cerithium  boeticum. 

Cerithium  zebrum  occurs  from  Henderson  Id.,  in  the 
Pitcairn  Group,  throughout  French  Polynesia  and  the 
Hawaiian  Islands,  and  westward  throughout  the  tropical 
Pacific  from  Queensland,  Australia,  north  to  the  Ryu- 
kyus.  It  is  found  throughout  the  archipelagos  of  southeast 
Asia  and  in  suitable  localities  in  the  Indian  Ocean.  In- 
deed, specimens  from  Tamarin  Bay,  Mauritius  (AXSP 
273492)  look  very  much  like  those  found  in  Tahiti  (Fig. 
6)  and  Guam  (Figs.  1-2,  4-5).  While  Cerithium  zebrum 
has  occasionally  been  collected  in  assemblages  from  depths 
greater  than  10  m  around  the  main,  volcanic  Hawaiian 
Islands  (Kay,  in  lit.),  it  is  more  common  on  the  shallow 
reefs  of  the  Northwestern  Hawaiian  Islands  at  French 
Frigate  Shoals  (ANSP  195368,  195384)  and  Midway 
(USNM  790897). 

To  my  knowledge,  Cerithium  zebrum  has  not  been 
recorded  as  a  fossil. 


Cerithium  boeticum  Pease,  1860 

Cerithium  pusillum  Gould,  1851:  120-121  (holotype,  USNM 
5572,  4  paratypes,  MCZ  216606;  type  locality,  Sandwich 
Ids  [Hawaiian  Ids);  nol  Cerithium  pusillum  Pfeiffer,  1840, 
nor  Dunker,1859);  Gould,  1852:150,  pi  10,  fig.  172a-b; 
Gould,  1862:62;  Dunker,  1882:108. 

Cerithium  boeticum  Pease,  I860:  433  (lectotype  [Kay,  1965], 
BMNH  1962802,  6  x  2.5  mm,  5  paralectotypes,  BMNH 
1962803;  type  locality.  Sandwich  Ids  [Hawaiian  Ids]);  Sow- 
erby, 1866  "haeticum",  pi.  12,  fig.  327;  1866b,  pi.  16,  fig. 
114;  Trvon,  1887:143,  pi.  27,  fig.  26;  Kobelt,  1898:236,  pi. 
41,  fig.  14;  Kay,  1965:48-49,  pi.  10,  fig.  8. 

Biitium  pusillum  (Gould)  Johnson,  1964:  136;  Kay,  1979:120 
(not  Biitium  pusillum  [Dunker,  1859]). 

Bitlium  zebrum  (Kiener)  Kay.  1979:  120.  fig.  45b-c  (not  ze- 
brum Kiener,  1841,  is  Bittium  pusillum  [Gould,  1849]). 

Bittium  boeticum  unilineatum  Pse.  (sic).  Mant,  1923:  121. 

Bittium  boeticum  Pils.  &  Va.  (sic).  Mant,  1923:  121. 

Description:  Shell  (Figs.  18-24,  26;  Table  2):  Shell  solid, 
turreted,  reaching  10.5  mm  length  and  4,6  mm  width, 
comprising  about  8  con\ex  whorls.  Protoconch  (Fig.  26) 
one  whorl,  smooth  with  straight  lip.  Early  whorls  sculp- 
tured with  two  spiral  cords  and  weak  axial  ribs.  Penul- 
timate whorl  sculptured  \\  ith  4  major  beaded,  spiral  cords 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1993 


Page  21 


each  separated  from  the  other  with  weak  spiral  Hrae, 
and  each  bearing  about  17  beads  aHned  to  form  17  strong 
axial  ribs.  Bod\  whorl  large,  sculptured  with  9  spiral 
beaded  cords  and  weak  spiral  lirae.  Several  varices  ran- 
domly distributed  on  shell,  strongest  opposite  outer  lip 
of  aperture.  Suture  deeply  impressed.  Aperture  oval- 
elongate,  a  little  over  one-third  the  shell  length.  Anterior 
canal  short,  well-defined,  oriented  at  45  degree  angle  to 
shell  axis;  outer  lip  thick,  strongly  denticulate  along  inner 
edge;  columella  concave  with  moderate  callus.  Anal  ca- 
nal weak,  defined  b\  parietal  plait. 

Animal:  Headfoot  without  lateral  epipodial  skirt;  weak- 
ly scalloped  operculiferous  lobe  present.  Operculum  (Fig. 
25)  corneous,  very  thin,  transparent  and  paucispiral  with 
slightly  eccentric  nucleus.  Osphradium  very  large,  about 
one-half  w  idth  of  ctenidium,  strongK  bipectinate  with 
large  pectins.  H> pobranchial  gland  well-developed.  Me- 
dial lamina  of  pallial  oviduct  with  spermatophore  bursa 
and  large  seminal  receptacle.  Radula  (Figs.  27-28)  very 
short,  about  one-twelfth  the  shell  length.  Rachidian  tooth 
(Fig.  28)  wider  than  tall,  hourglass-shaped,  with  basal 
plate  having  short  basal  projection  and  two  small  lateral 
buttresses;  cutting  edge  with  spade-shaped  central  cusp 
flanked  on  each  side  with  three,  sometimes  two,  small 
pointed  denticles.  Lateral  tooth  w  ith  rectangular  basal 
plate  having  long  lateral  projection  and  short  basal  but- 
tress; cutting  edge  with  small  inner  denticle,  long  spoon- 
shaped  major  cusp,  and  two,  sometimes  three,  outer 
pointed  denticles.  Marginal  teeth  elongate,  spatulate  with 
curved  tips;  inner  marginal  tooth  w  ith  two  inner  denticles 
long,  major  central  cusp  and  one  outer  denticle;  outer 
marginal  tooth  same  but  without  outer  denticle. 

Synonymic  remarks:  Cerithium  boeticum  has  been 
confused  with  several  other  taxa  assigned  to  Cerithium 
or  Bittiiim  by  authors.  The  earliest  name  for  the  species 
is  Cerithium  pusillum  Gould,  1851,  but  as  this  name  is 
preoccupied,  the  next  available  valid  name  is  Cerithium 
boeticum  Pease,  1860.  Although  the  figures  subsequently 
presented  by  Gould  (1852,  pi.  10,  figs.  172a-b)  for  Cer- 
ithium pusillum  are  not  very  good,  the  holotype  (USNM 
5572)  clearK  shows  that  this  taxon  is  different  from  Cer- 
ithium zebrum  Kiener,  with  which  it  has  been  confused 
(e.g.,  Kay,  1979;  120).  Cerithium  pusillum  Dunker,  1859, 
and  Cerithium  pusillum  Gould,  1851,  are  different  spe- 
cies, but  as  both  taxa  have  been  referred  to  Bittium  by 
authors,  some  confusion  has  developed  about  their  iden- 
tity. 

Cerithium  boeticum  Pease  is  a  name  seldom  men- 
tioned in  the  literature  and  has  not  been  a  well-under- 
stood species.  Kay  (1965)  designated  a  lectotype  and  five 
paralectotypes  from  the  original  type  lot  of  six  beach- 
worn  specimens,  but  her  illustration  of  the  lectotype  (1965, 
pi.  10,  fig.  8)  is  poor  and  is  not  helpful  in  clarifying  the 
concept  of  the  species.  Kay  (1979)  subsequently  placed 
this  taxon  into  the  synonymy  of  Cerithium  zebrum,  a 
species  with  a  wide  Indo-Pacific  distribution.  Further 
confusion  has  developed  because  another  Pease  (1860) 
name,  Cerithium  unilineatum,  a  valid  svnonvm  of  Cer- 


ithium zebrum  Kiener,  was  combined  with  Cerithium 
boeticum  Pease  to  form  a  trinomial  In  some  museum 
collections  the  manuscript  name,  Cerithium  gouldianum 
Pilsbry  &  Vanatta,  is  found  associated  with  lots  of  Cer- 
ithium boeticum.  but  the  name  has  no  validity. 

Discussion:  As  mentioned  above,  Cerithium  boeticum 
had  been  condsidered  to  be  synonymous  with  the  com- 
mon Indo-Pacific  species,  Cerithium  zebrum  Kiener,  but 
the  former  species  has  a  thicker,  less  elongate  shell  with 
coarser  sculpture,  few  weak  varices,  a  stronger  anterior 
canal,  and  a  different  kind  of  protoconch  than  Cerithium 
zebrum  (see  Figs.  18-26);  moreover,  Cerithium  boeti- 
cum appears  to  be  restricted  to  the  Hawaiian  Islands, 
whereas  Cerithium  zebrum  is  distributed  throughout  the 
Indo-Pacific.  Shells  of  the  two  species  frequently  share 
similar  color  patterns,  especially  among  the  banded, 
striped  morphs,  but  when  closely  compared,  they  are 
seen  to  be  realK'  quite  different.  Radular  differences  be- 
tween the  tw  o  species  although  slight,  are  consistent  and 
serve  to  distinguish  each  of  them  (see  Table  3).  The  very 
thin,  nearly  transparent  operculum  of  Cerithium  boe- 
ticum (Fig.  25)  differs  from  the  thicker  one  of  Cerithium 
zebru m . 

Gould  (1851)  mentioned  that  Cerithium  boeticum 
(cited  as  Cerithium  pusillum)  was  "like  C.  ferrugineum 
Sa\-,  but  much  smaller".  Cerithium  ferrugineum  is  a 
s\nonym  of  Cerithium  lutosum  Menke,  a  small  species 
from  the  western  Atlantic,  and  indeed  Cerithium  boe- 
ticum does  bear  some  resemblance  to  small  morphs  of 
Cerithium  lutosum  in  overall  shell  morphology  (see 
Houbrick,  1974,  pi.  41). 

An  unusual  anatomical  feature  of  Cerithium  boeticum 
is  the  large,  well-developed  bipectinate  osphradium.  Al- 
though Cerithium  zebrum  also  has  a  bipectinate  os- 
phradium, the  pectins  are  poorly  defined.  A  bipectinate 
osphradium  is  common  to  all  members  of  Cerithium 
Bruguiere  and  Chjpeomorus  Jousseaume  (see  Houbrick, 
1974,  1985),  but  not  as  common  among  Bittium  species 
(pers.  obsr).  Although  Cerithium  boeticum  has  a  weakly 
scalloped  operculiferous  lobe,  the  lateral  epipodial  skirt, 
indicative  of  Bittium  species,  is  absent.  The  absence  of 
a  spermatophore  bursa  in  the  lateral  lamina  of  the  pallial 
oviduct,  which  is  the  hallmark  of  Bittium  species,  is  one 
of  the  chief  anatomical  reasons  for  reassignment  of  this 
species  to  Cerithium.  However,  the  specimens  studied 
herein  may  not  have  attained  complete  reproductive  ma- 
turity, and  this  needs  reconfirmation. 

Cerithium  boeticum  lives  in  shallow  water  on  subtidal 
rubble  where  it  is  frequently  found  on  marine  algae. 
This  species  has  lecithotrophic  development,  which  is 
reflected  in  its  relatively  unsculptured  protoconch,  com- 
prising only  one  whorl  with  a  nearlv  straight  apertural 
Up  (Fig.  26). 

Cerithium  boeticum  appears  to  be  endemic  to  the 
Hawaiian  Islands.  It  is  geographically  sympatric  with 
Cerithium  zebrum,  especially  in  the  northern  part  of  the 
Hawaiian  chain.  This  species  has  been  recorded  from 
the  Pleistocene  of  Molokai  (Ostergaard,  1939,  as  Ceri- 
thium boeticum). 


Page  22 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


Table  3.    Characters  defining  Ceritbiurn  zclmim  and  Ceri- 
thiitrn  hoeticum. 


Cerithium  zebruni 


Cerilhium  hoeticum 


Sculpture 

1.  Weak  axial  riblets  Strong  axial  ribs 

2.  Many  weak  spiral  beads  Fewer  strong  spiral  beads 

3.  Weakly  impressed  suture  Strongly  impressed  suture 

4.  Many  broad  white  varices  Few  weak  varices 

5.  Protoconch  highly  sculji-  Protoconch  unsculptured 
tared 

6.  Thin  outer  apertural  lip  Thick  outer  apertural  lip 

7.  Aperture  '74  shell  length  Aperture  'i  shell  length 

Radula 

1.  Radula  short  Radula  very  short 

2.  Rachidian  height  equal  to  Rachidian  wider  than  tall 
width 

3.  Rachidian  cusp  flanked  Rachidian  cusp  flanked 
with  2  denticles  on  each  with  3  denticles  on  each 
side                                                    side 

4.  Inner  marginal  with  3  in-  Inner  marginal  with  2  inner 
ner  and  2  outer  denticles  and  one  outer  denticle 

Osphradium 

1.  Weakly  bipectinate  Large,  strongly  bipectinate 

Development 
1.  Plantotrophic  Lecithotrophic 

A  sumniar)  ol  the  dittereiices  between  these  two  spe- 
cies is  presented  below,  in  Table  3. 

CONCLUSIONS 

Evidence  is  presented  above  to  show  that  the  Hawaiian 
species,  Cerithium  hoeticum,  is  morphologically  distinct 
from  Cerithium  zebrum.  Although  both  species  had  pre- 
viously been  assigned  to  Bittium.  anatomical  evidence 
shows  that  this  is  incorrect.  As  both  taxa  were  thought 
to  be  Bittium  species,  they  were  omitted  from  my  Indo- 
Pacific  Cerithium  monograph  (Houbrick,  1992).  Ceri- 
thium hoeticum  is  restricted  to  the  Hawaiian  Islands 
while  Cerithium  zebrum  has  a  very  wide  Indo-Pacific 
distribution,  including  the  Hawaiian  Islands. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  thank  Michael  Hadfield,  of  the  Univeristy  of  Hawaii, 
Honolulu,  Hawaii,  for  the  use  of  laboratory  space  and 
for  assistance  during  field  studies  in  Hawaii.  I  am  grateful 
to  Alison  Kay  for  valuable  discussions  about  the  geo- 
graphic distribution  of  both  species  throughout  the  Ha- 
waiian Islands.  Lou  Eldredge,  University  of  Guam,  kind- 
ly provided  me  with  lab  space  and  logistic  support  at  the 
Pago  Ray  lab  of  the  University  of  Guam.  The  work  at 
the  marine  laboratory  at  Enewetak  Atoll  was  made  pos- 
sible by  a  grant  from  the  Atomic  Energy  Commission. 
Bernadette  Holthuis,  University  of  Guam,  kindly  ob- 
served living  Bittium  zebrum  specimens  in  the  field  aiul 
passed  on  her  observations  to  me.  I  am  grateful  for  the 
use  the  Smithsonian  Secretary's  Research  Opportunity 


Fund,  w  hich  covered  the  costs  of  transporation  and  lodg- 
ing in  both  Guam  and  Hawaii  during  this  study.  Susanne 
Braden  of  the  Smithsonian  Scanning  Electron  Micro- 
scope Lab  provided  assistance  with  the  SEM  micrographs 
and  V'ictor  Krantz,  Smithsonian  Photographic  Services, 
helped  with  photography. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Cernohorsky,  W.  O.,    1972.    Marine  shells  of  the  Pacific,  Vol. 

2,  411  pp.,  68  pis.  Pacific  Publications,  Ltd.,  Sydney. 
Crosse,  M.H.,    1863.    Description  d'especes  nouvelles  d'Aus- 

tralie.  Journal  de  Conchyliologie  11:84-90,  pi.  1. 
Dautzenberg,  P.  &  J.L.  Bouge,    1933.    Les  mollusques  testaces 

marins  des  etablissements  Fran9aise  de  I'oceanie.  Journal 

de  Conchyliologie  27(2);145-469. 
Deshayes,  G.P.,    1863.    Catalogue  des  mollusques  de  I'lle  de 

la  Reunion  (Bourbon).  144  pp.,  pis.  Paris,  Dentu. 
Dunker,  G.     1859-1860.     Neue  japanische  Mollusken.  Mala- 

kozoologische  Blatter  6:221-240. 
Dunker,  G.    1882.    Index  Molluscorum  Maris  Japonica.  Nov- 

itates  Conchologiae,  Supplement  to  Volume  7.  Cassell. 
Gould,  A.    1851.    Descriptions  of  new  species,  brought  home 

by  the  US,  Exploring  Expedition  Proceedings  of  the  Bos- 
ton Society  of  Natural  History  3:118-121. 
Gould,  A.    1852.    Mollusca  and  shells,  X'olume  12,  510  pages, 

atlas  in  US.  Exploring  Expedition  during  the  vears  1838, 

1839,  1840,  1841,  1842  under  the  command  of  Charles 

Wilkes,  U. S.N.Boston:  Gould  &  Lincoln. 
Gould,  A.  A.    1861.   Descriptions  of  shells  collected  in  the  North 

Pacific  Exploring  Expedition  under  Captains  Ringgold  and 

Rodgers.   Proceedings  of  the  Boston  Societv  of  Natural 

History  7:  385-389. 
Gould,  A..\.    1862.    Otia  Conchologica:  Descriptions  of  shells 

and  mollusks,  from  1839  to  1862,  256  pp,  Boston,  Gould 

&  Lincoln, 
Gray,  J,  E.     1847.     A  list  of  the  genera  of  Recent  Mollusca, 

their  synonyma  and  types.  Proceedings  of  the  Zoological 

Society  of  London  (for  1847)  15(I78):129-219  (November 

1847). 
Hedley,  C.    1899.    The  Mollusca  of  Funafuti,  Part  1, -Gaster- 
opoda. Australian  Museum,  Svdnev,  Memoir  3,  pp,  397- 

488. 
Houbrick,  R.S,     1974,    The  genus  Cerithium  in  the  western 

Atlantic.  Johnsonia  5(10):33-84,  48  pis. 
Houbrick,  R.S.    1985.    Genus  Clypeomorus  Jousseaume  (Cer- 

ithiidae:  Prosobranchia).  Smithsonian  Contributions  to  Zo- 
ology No,403:  iv  +  131  pp,,  62  figs, 
Houbrick,  R.S.     1992.     Monograph  of  the  genus  Cerithium 

Bruguiere  in  the  Indo-Pacific  (Cerithiidae:  Prosobranchia). 

Smithsonian  Contributions  to  Zoology  No.  510:  208  pp., 

145  figs. 
Johnson,  R.    1964,    The  Recent  Mollusca  of  .Augustus  .\ddison 

Gould.  Bulletin  of  the  United  States  National  Museum  239: 

v  -I-  182  pp.,  45  pis. 
Kay,  E.  A.    1965.    Marine  mollusks  in  the  Cuming  collection, 

British  Museum  (Natural  Histor\ )  described  by  William 

Harper  Pease.  Bulletin  of  the  British  Museum  (Natural 

Histor\ ),  ZoologN ,  Supplement  1,  London  96  pp.,  14  pis. 
Kay,  E,A,     1979.     Hawaiian  Marine  Shells    Bishop  Museum 

Press,  Special  Publication  64(4),  Honolulu,  Hawaii,  653 

PP 
Kiener,  L.C.     1841.    Species  genera!  et  iconograpliie  des  co- 


R.  S.  Houbrick,  1993 


Page  23 


quilles  vivantes.  Genre  Cerite    Paris   vol   5:  10-4  pp  ,  32 

pis. 
Kobelt,  W.    1888-1898.    Die  Gattung  Ccrithium.  in  F.  H.  W. 

Martini,  &  J.  H.  Chemnitz,  Neues  systematisches  Conchy- 

iien-Cabinet  ...  1  (pp.  297  pages).  Nurnberg:  Bauer  & 

Raspe. 
Melvill,  J.C.   &  R.  Standen.     1895.     Notes  on  a  collection  of 

shells  from  Lifu  and  Uvea,  Loyalty  Islands,  formed  b\  the 

Rev  James  and  Mrs.  Hadfield,  with  a  list  of  species.  Journal 

of  Conchology  8:  84-132,  pis.  2-3. 
Mant,  C.  F.    1923.    Mollusca  from  the  dredging  operations  at 

Kewalo  Harbor,  Honolulu,  1921.  The  Nautilus  36(4):120- 

123. 
Ostergaard,  J.M.    1939.    Reports  on  fossil  Mollusca  of  Molokai 

and  Maui.  Occasional  Papers  of  Bernice  P.  Bishop  Museum 

Honolulu  Hawaii  15(6):  67-77. 
Pease,  W.  H.    1861,    Descriptions  of  Forty-seven  New  Species 

of  Shells,  from  the  Sandwich  Islands,  in  the  Collection  of 

Hugh  Cuming,  Esq.  Proceedings  of  the  Zoological  Society 

of  London  431-438. 
Pfeiffer,  L     1840.    Ubersichtder  im  Januar,  Februar  und  Marz, 


1839  auf  Cuba  gesammelten  Mollusken.  Archiv  Natur- 
geschite6(l);250-261. 

Salvat,  B.,  &  C.  Rives.  1975.  Coquillages  de  Polynesie.  392 
pp,  illustrated   Papeete,  Tahiti. 

Schepman,  MM.  1909.  The  Prosobranchia  of  the  Siboga  Ex- 
pedition. Part  2.  Taenioglossa  and  Ptenoglossa.  Leyden, 
Brill,  7  pis. 

Sowerby,  G.B.  1855  Monograph  of  the  genus  Cerithium. 
.'\danson.  In  Thesaurus  Conch)  liorum,  or  monographs  of 
genera  of  shells.  London,  2(16);847-899,  pis.  176-186. 

Sowerby,  G.B.  1865-66.  Monograph  of  the  genus  Cerithium 
Adanson  in:  Reeve,  Conchologia  Iconica:  or  illustrations 
of  molluscous  animals.  London.  15  (atlas),  20  pis.  +  index. 

Tiberi,  N.  1863.  Description  d'especes  nouvelles  de  la  mer 
Mediterranee.  Journal  de  Conchyliologie  11:  158-160. 

Tryon,  G.W.  1887.  Manual  of  Conchology;  structural  and 
systematic  with  illustrations  of  the  species  (Cerithiidae), 
First  series.  Philadelphia,  9:  112-228,  19-39  pis. 

Vignal,  L.  1903.  Sur  les  varietes  du  Cerithium  zebrum  Kiener. 
Journal  de  Conchyliologie  51(l):21-27,  pi,  2. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(1  ):24-28.  1993 


Page  24 


Rediscovery  of  TurhineUa  thersites  Reeve,  1847,  with  Notes  on 
its  Taxonomic  Position  (Gastropoda:  Fasciolariidae) 


R.  N.  Kilburn 

Natal  Museum 

P/Bag  9070 

Pietermaritzburg  3200,  South  Africa 


ABSTRACT 

The  holot\pe  of  Turbinella  thersites  Reeve,  1847,  was  believed 
to  have  been  collected  in  China;  no  further  specimens  have 
subsequently  been  reported.  Comparison  with  recently  trawled 
material  indicates  that  it  was  actually  dredged  on  the  Agulhas 
Bank.  Turbinella  thersites  is  here  transferred  from  the  family 
Turbinellidae  to  the  genus  Fasciolaria,  within  the  family  Fas- 
ciolariidae. 

Key  words:  Fasciolariidae;  Turbinellidae;  South  African;  ne- 
ritic;  Fasciolaria.  Turbinella 


INTRODUCTION 

Turbinella  thersites  Reeve,  1847,  was  based  on  a  single 
specimen  (Fig.  3)  originally  in  the  collection  of  Captain 
Sir  Edward  Belcher,  and  supposedK-  from  China.  Noting 
that  it  appeared  to  be  immature,  Ree\e  obser\ed  that 
"it  rather  partakes  of  the  character  of  Fasciolaria",  a 
view  echoed  b\-  Melvill  (1891),  who  speculated  that  it 
might  belong  to  either  Fasciolaria  Lamarck,  1801  (fam- 
ily Fasciolariidae)  or  Tudicla  Roding,  1798  i^Turbinel- 
lidae).  Kobelt  (1874)  cited  it  as  Turbinella  (Plicatella) 
thersites,  and  Tryon  (1881)  similarly  included  it  within 
the  genus  Latirus  Montfort,  1810  (=  Plicatella  S\\  ainson. 
1840).  FinalK',  Yen  (1942),  in  a  paper  on  C^hinese  gas- 
tropods in  the  Natural  Histor\  Museum,  London,  pub- 
lished a  photograph  of  the  holot\pe,  under  the  name 
Tudicla  thersites,  and  quoted  the  type  locality  without 
comment.  No  specimens  additional  to  the  holot\pe  are 
on  record,  and  no  further  reference  to  the  species  has 
been  traced,  notwithstanding  the  considerable  bod\'  of 
literature  that  has  been  published  in  recent  decades  on 
the  mollusks  of  the  Sino-japanese  region. 

,\mong  the  larger  mollusks  that  are  brought  up  in  the 
nets  of  commercial  trawlers  operating  on  the  .Vgulhas 
Bank,  the  continental  shelf  south  of  South  Africa,  are 
several  species  of  Fasciolaria.  Most  commonly  trawled 
are  F.  scholvieni  Strebel,  1912,  bathymorphs  of  F.  lu- 
gubris  lugtdnis  Ree\e.  1847,  and  its  eastern  sulxspecies 
F.  lugubris  heynemanni  Dunker,  1871,  and  the  bathyal 
F.  rutila  (Watson,  1882);  less  commonly  seen  is  F.  uat- 
tersac  Kilburn.  1974.  On  rare  occasions  a  fifth  species. 


distinguishable  by  its  sculpture  of  auriculate  ribs,  is 
trawled.  Such  ribs  similarK'  characterize  the  "lost"  Tur- 
binella thersites,  and  comparison  of  juvenile  specimens 
of  this  "fifth  species"  with  the  equally  juvenile  holotype 
of  T.  thersites  confirms  their  identity . 

.At  the  time  of  description  of  Turbinella  thersites,  the 
only  .\gulhas  Bank  mollusks  known  had  been  dredged 
during  the  cruises  of  the  H.M.S.  Sulphur  USo6-1842) 
and  H.M.S.  Samarang  (1843-1846'.  both  captained  by 
Belcher.  Confusion  of  localities  in  Belcher  material  from 
these  voyages  is  not  infrequent,  and  using  the  line  of 
reasoning  ad\anced  b\  Tomlin  (1925:  310).  with  regard 
to  the  origins  of  the  holotvpe  of  Turrit ella  ferruginea 
Ree\e.  1849,  one  can  speculate  that  the  holotv  pe  of  Tur- 
binella thersites  was  originalK  amongst  the  mollusks 
dredged  by  Belcher  on  the  .\gulhas  Bank  during  the 
vo\age  of  H.M.S.  Samarang  i^this  expedition  was  spe- 
cificalK  mentioned  b\  Ree\e  under  the  description  of 
Turbinella  [=  Latirus]  belcheri  Ree\e.  18471  Indeed 
the  case  of  Turrit  ella  declivis  .\dams  &  Reeve.  1S50.  is 
directly  comparable:  although  originalK  said  to  have 
been  dredged  b\  the  Samarang  in  the  "China  Sea",  this 
species  was  subsequentK  shown  i,Tomlin.  1925:  313)  to 
be  characteristic  of  the  Agulhas  Bank  biota.  Although  at 
present  little  precise  data  is  a\  ailable  for  Fasciolaria  ther- 
sites. indications  are  that,  like  Turritclla  dcclivis.  it  is  a 
continental  shelf  species  endemic  to  the  .\gulhas  Bank. 

The  second  known  example  (Fig.  5)  of  Fasciolaria 
thersites  was  actually  collected  in  1962.  but  its  identity 
w  ent  unrecognized,  until  it  w  as  .sent  to  me  for  comment 
in  19S(i  b\  J.  H.  McLean  of  the  Los  .\ngeles  Count) 
Mviseum.  CuriousK .  a.ssociated  with  it  w  as  a  similar  error 
in  localization.  Originating  from  the  collection  of  the  late 
I'ranz  Steiner.  the  label  states:  "This  shell  w  as  found  in 
dredged  santl.  Nacala,  Mozambique,  on  the  19  June, 
19ti2,  b\  nic  .  BiogeographicalK ,  it  would  be  unprece- 
dented for  such  a  temperate-w  ater  .\gulhas  Bank  species 
to  live  also  on  the  tropical  coral  coast  of  northern  Mo- 
zambique, and  its  origin  is  sureK  ad\  entitious.  It  is  not 
impossible  that  this  specimen  w  as  jettisoned  from  a  ship 
docking  in  Nacala  harbor,  but  although  worn,  it  lacks 
the  porcellaneous  appearance  normally  seen  in  shells  that 
ha\e  lain  on  coral  sand  for  a  length)  period.  It  is  thus 


R.  N.  Kilburn.  1993 


Pa2e25 


Figures  1-2.  Protoconch  of  Fasciolaria  thersites   Reeve.  18471  Scale  lines  =  1  mm. 


more  probable  that  Steiner  accidentalK  separated  it  from 
a  sample  of  trawled  Cape  moUusks.  and  mLxed  it  with 
his  Mozambican  finds.  Indeed,  in  1962  or  196-3  I  was 
personalK  told  b\  Steiner  then  a  radio-operator  in  the 
merchant  navy)  that  while  on  the  Xacala  route  he  reg- 
ularK  received  trawled  shelb  from  a  source  in  Cape 
Town,  who  accumulated  them  in  barrels  of  preserv  ative 
on  his  behalf. 

This  species  and  its  temperate-water  South  .\frican 
congeners  agree  in  teleoconch  characters  with  the  genus 
Fasciolaria  Lamarck.  1799.  in  its  broadest  sense.  Radula 
characters,  known  for  all  species  v  Kilbum.  1974.  Barnard. 
1958).  except  F.  thersites.  also  agree,  .\lthough  species 
with  shoulder  nodules  are  generally  referred  to  subgenus 
^sometimes  even  genus)  Pleuroploca  P.  Fischer.  1SS4. 
such  a  classification  does  not  address  the  problem  of  ta.xa 
such  as  Fasciolaria  filamentosa  \R6ding.  1798)  and  F. 
lugubris  Reeve.  1S47.  in  which  nodules  are  present  or 
absent  according  to  individual  or  population.  The  fi\e 
species  endemic  to  South  .\frican  waters  share  a  close 
morphological  similarity  but  differ  from  all  other  species 
of  Fasciolaria  in  their  extremely  large  and  bulbous  pro- 
toconch (Figs  1-2'.  which  has  a  basal  diameter  of  3.0- 
5.0  mm.  according  to  species  and  individual.  Such  a 
protoconch  cannot  be  dismissed  as  merely  an  adaptive 
correlation  with  mode  of  development,  because  this  is 
similarly  non-planktotrophic  in  four  of  the  five  other 
species  of  Fasciolaria  (=  Pleuroploca''  in  which  devel- 
opment is  known  [see  D'.\saro.  1970a.  1970b.  Gohar  & 
Eisawy .  1967.  Shepherd  &  Thomas.  1989).  and  is  there 
associated  with  a  much  smaller  protoconch.  .\  second 
character  of  possible  significance  is  egg-capsule  shape: 
in  the  sole  Cape  species  in  which  these  are  known  {F. 
lugubris\  capsules  differ  from  those  reported  for  other 
species  of  Fasciolaria  in  being  dorsally  rounded  without 
a  demarcated  escape  hatch  ^see  Kilburn  &  Rippey.  1982: 
text  fig  62 i.  Egg  capsules  have  been  described  for  three 
species  from  North  .\merica.  and  one  each  from  the 


tropical  Indo-Pacific,  Mediterranean  and  southern  -\us- 
traha  ; references  given  above,  also  BaccL  1947).  In  all 
of  thec-e.  the  capsule  is  flat-topped,  with  a  structural  es- 
cape hatch  dorsally.  It  is  possible  that  recognition  of  the 
South  -\f  rican  species-complex  at  the  subgenxis  level  may 
ultimately  prove  warranted  on  grounds  of  protoconch 
size  and  perhaps  capsxile  form. 


Fasciolaria  thersites 
Figures  1-7 


Reeve.  1S47  ,  n.  comb. 


Turbinella  thersites  Reeve.  1S47:  pi.  4.  sp  21:  MeKiU.  1S91: 
409.  Type  localit> :  China  [here  emended  to  .\gulfaas  Bank]. 

Turbinella  ,  Flicatella  '•  thersites:  Kobelt  in  Kster  &  KobelL  1574: 
71.  157.  pL  18.  fig.  1  ^afte^  Reeve':  Kobelt  1S76:  21. 

Lc-'":'  -rf-rfites:  Tryon.  1851:  91.  pL  6S.  fig.  137  .after  Reeve). 

7  '-'^tes:  Yen.  1942;  237,  pL  25.  fig.  17S  iholot>-pei. 

r  ^>---  .i^'-.i^  icattersae  ynon  Kjlbum.  1974  :  Richards.  1981:  63, 
pi.  :35.  fig.  .300. 

Description:  Shell  fusiform,  with  bluntly  papiUiform 
apes,  slphonal  canal  equal  in  length  to  aperture,  curved 
slighdv  to  right:  suture  moderately  shallow,  whorls 
strongly  convex,  except  immediately  below  suture  where 
they  are  shaUowly  concave.  Inner  fip  with  a  thin  callus 
glaze,  smooth  except  for  a  thin  spiral  ridge  just  above 
mid-parietal  region  and  three  obhque  basal  pleats;  of 
these  the  strongest  pleat  is  situated  at  entrance  to  siphonal 
canal  and  the  weaker  posterior  two  decrease  in  strength 
and  are  scarcely  visible  from  without  the  aperture.  Te- 
leoconch sculptvtred  by  strongly  prosochne.  rather  turn  id 
axial  ribs,  which  project  at  shoulder  in  a  roundedly  au- 
riculate  manner:  in  most  examples,  asials  become  weak 
on  later  whorls,  except  sometimes  for  an  occasional  strong 
rib,  but  they  may  remain  strong  throughout:  fine  spiral 
threads,  crossed  by  microscopic  coUabral  threads,  present 
overall.  First  teleoconch  whorl  with  8  straight  prosocline 
asials.  the  first  few  low  and  relatively  close,  thereafter 
in  transverse  section  thick,  strongly   rounded,  slightly 


Page  26 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


R.  N.  Kilburn,  1993 


Page  27 


compressed,  more  or  less  equal  to  intervals,  which  are 
flattened;  Second  whorl  with  6-7  axials,  third  generally 
with  5,  fourth  with  4.  Spiral  lirae  unequal  in  width, 
groups  of  fine  threads  being  often  separated  by  groups 
of  coarser  ones,  those  on  siphonal  rostrum  rather  uniform 
in  strength.  Collabral  threads  ma\  be  pliculate  in  places, 
generally  rendering  intervals  between  spiral  lirae  punc- 
ticulate  and  the  spirals  themselves  somewhat  scabrous. 
Off  white,  with  a  thin  yellowish-brown  periostracum. 
Protoconch  bulbous,  of  about  IV2  whorls,  first  whorl 
strongl)  tilted,  smooth,  last  half  whorl  with  uneven,  pro- 
socline  axial  riblets;  maximum  breadth  3.0-4.8  mm, 
height  3.1-4.4  mm  (ratio  breadth/height  0.87-1.13). 
Maximum  dimensions  102.0  x  39.6  mm  (R.  Le  Maitre 
collection).  Holotype  (juvenile)  49.0  x  22.1  mm.  Oper- 
culum oblanceolate  with  rather  obtuse  apex,  moderately 
thick  with  coarse  growth  lines;  color  amber-brown,  with 
darker  outer  edge. 

Distribution:  Agulhas  Bank, 

Type  material:  Holotype  in  the  Natural  History  Muse- 
um, London,  accession  number  1879.2.26.116,  from 
Lombe-Taylor  collection. 

Other  material  examined:  Agulhas  Bank  [Natal  Museum 
(NM)  D3482:  R.  Le  Maitre,  also  several  specimens  in 
colln  Le  Maitre];  off  Cape  St.  Blaize  area,  ex  pisce  (NM 
B1087;  R.  Le  Maitre,  juvenile);  off  Storms  River  mouth, 
69  fathoms  [=  126  m],  in  mud,  a  juvenile  shell  (NM 
S4953:  C.  Marais);  same  data,  64  fathoms  [=  117  m],  a 
broken  juvenile  (NM  S5646;  C.  Marais);  "Nacala  harbor, 
dredged  sand",  empty  shell  (NM  K1526:  F.  Steiner,  don. 
J.  H.  McLean). 

Remarks:  I  have  seen  no  adults  of  this  species  with  an 
undamaged  lip,  and  only  two  specimens  (both  dead  ju- 
veniles of  about  3  teleoconch  whorls)  bear  a  precise  lo- 
cality. Its  exact  distribution  on  the  Agulhas  Bank,  both 
geographic  and  bathymetric,  consequently  remains  to  be 
established. 

Fasciolaria  thersites  shows  much  variation  in  size  of 
protoconch  and  extent  of  axial  ribbing  on  the  teleoconch; 
too  little  material  is  available  to  judge  whether  this  re- 
flects geographic,  individual  or  bathymetric  variation. 
The  smallest  protoconchs  measured  occur  in  the  holotype 
and  in  the  specimen  purportedK'  from  Nacala  (although 
it  is  more  or  less  worn  in  both  examples);  in  the  latter 
individual  the  axial  ribs  are  unusually  strong  on  later 
whorls.  Similar  variability  in  protoconch  size  was  re- 
ported for  F.  schotvieni  Strebel,  1912,  by  Kilburn  (1974). 
In  appearance  F.  thersites  is  most  similar  to  F.  wattersae 
Kilburn,  1974,  an  uncommon  species  which  inhabits  the 
Mossel  Bay-Algoa  Bay  area  at  depths  of  about  100-120 


m.  In  F.  wattersae  (Fig.  7)  the  axial  ribs  are  never  au- 
riculate,  the  spiral  sculpture  is  markedly  coarser,  and 
pliculate  axial  striae  are  totally  absent.  Although  appar- 
ently inhabiting  similar  depths,  F.  thersites  is  a  much 
thinner-shelled  species.  Among  the  species  of  Fasciolaria 
endemic  to  South  Africa,  the  operculum  in  F.  thersites 
is  unique  in  its  amber-brown  color,  this  being  dark  brown 
in  the  other  species. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  wish  to  thank  Ms.  Kathie  Way  of  the  Natural  History 
Museum,  London,  for  the  loan  of  the  holotype  of  Tiir- 
binella  thersites.  Messrs.  R.  Le  Maitre  and  C.  Marais  for 
providing  material  from  the  Agulhas  Bank,  and  Dr.  J. 
H.  McLean  for  donating  the  Steiner  specimen  to  the 
Natal  Museum.  Drs.  D.  G.  Herbert  and  B.  R.  Stuckenberg 
read  the  manuscript,  and  Mrs.  Linda  Davis  prepared  the 
line  drawing. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Bacci,  G.  1947.  Le  capsule  ovigere  di  Cohimbella  rustica  (L.) 
e  di  Fasciolaria  lignaria  (L.).  Bolletino  Zoologico  14;  75- 
81. 

Barnard,  K.  H.  1958.  Contribution  to  the  knowledge  of  South 
African  marine  Mollusca.  Part  I.  Gastropoda:  Prosobran- 
chiata:  Toxoglossa.  ,'\nnals  of  the  South  African  Museum 
44(4):73-163,  figs.  1-30,  pi.  1. 

D'Asaro,  C.  N.  1970a.  Egg  capsules  of  some  prosobranchs 
from  the  Pacific  coast  of  Panama.  Veliger  13:37-43, 

D'Asaro,  C.  N,  1970b,  Egg  capsules  of  prosobranch  mollusks 
from  South  Florida  and  the  Bahamas  and  notes  on  spawn- 
ing in  the  laboratory.  Bulletin  of  Marine  Science.  20:414- 
440. 

Gohar,  H.  A.  F.  &  A.  M  Eisawy.  1967.  The  egg  masses  and 
development  of  five  rachiglossan  prosobranchs  from  the 
Bed  Sea  Publications  of  the  Marine  Biological  Station  of 
Ghardaqa.  14:215-268. 

Kilburn,  R.  N.  1974,  Taxonomic  notes  on  South  African  ma- 
rine Mollusca  (3):  Gastropoda,  Prosobranchia,  with  de- 
scriptions of  new  taxa  of  Naticidae,  Fasciolariidae,  Ma- 
gilidae,  \'olutomitridae  and  Turridae,  Annals  of  the  Natal 
Museum  22(1):  187-220, 

Kilburn,  R.N.  &  E.  Rippey,  1982.  Sea  Shells  of  Southern 
Africa.  Johannesburg:  Macmillan. 

Kobelt,  W.  1844-1876.  Turbinella  und  Fasciolaria.  In  Kster, 
H.  C.  &  Kobelt,  W.,  Systematisches  Conchylien-Cabinet 
von  Martini  und  Chemnitz,  2nd  Edition,  3(3a):l-164,  pis, 
1-32, 

Melvill,  J,  C,  1891.  An  historical  account  of  the  genus  La^irus 
(Montfort)  and  its  dependencies,  with  descriptions  of  elev- 
en new  species,  and  a  catalogue  of  Latirus  and  Peristernia. 
Memoirs  and  Proceedings  of  the  Manchester  Literar\  and 
Philosophic  Society  [4]  4:365-411. 


Figures  3-7.  Fasciolaria  thersites  (Reeve,  1847)  and  F.  wattersae  Kilburn,  1974  Fasciolaria  thersites:  3.  Juvenile  holotype  of 
Turbinella  thersites  Reeve,  1847,  Natural  History  Museum,  London,  1879  2.26.116,  49.0  x  22  1  mm.  4.  Immature  example  from 
Agulhas  Bank,  78.9  x33,6  mm,  in  R,  Le  Maitre  colln,  5,  Specimen  supposedly  from  Nacala  Bay,  NM  K1526,  length  76,2  mm.  6. 
Adult  example,  Agulhas  Bank,  depth  unknown,  NM  D3482,  length  100,2  mm,  outer  lip  damaged.  7.  Fasciolaria  wattersae  Kilburn, 
1974,  S.  E.  of  Mossel  Bay,  119  m,  NM  E5898,  98.7  x32.3  mm. 


Page  28 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


Reeve,  L.  A.  1847.  Monograph  of  the  genus  Turbinella.  Con- 
chologia  Iconica  -1.  London:  Reeve 

Richards,  D.  1981.  South  African  Shells.  A  collector's  guide. 
Cape  Town:  Struik, 

Shepherd,  S.  A.  &  I.  M.  Thomas.  1989.  Marine  Invertebrates 
of  southern  Australia.  Part  II.  .Adelaide:  S.  Australian  Gov- 
ernment Printing  Division. 

Tomlin,  J.  R   Le  B.    1925.    Reports  on  the  marine  Mollusca  in 


the  collections  of  the  South  African  Museum.  I.  Turritel- 
lidae.  .Annals  of  the  South  .\frican  Museum  25:309-316. 

Tryon,  G.  W.  1881.  Tritonidae,  Fusidae,  Buccinidae.  In: 
Manual  of  Conchology  3.  Philadelphia,  privately  pub- 
lished. 

Yen,  T.  C.  1942.  A  review  of  Chinese  gastropods  in  the  British 
Museum.  Proceedings  of  the  Malacological  Society  of  Lon- 
don. 24:170-289,  pis.  11-28. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(1  ):29-32.  1993 


Page  29 


The  Rediscovery,  Morphology,  and  Identity  of 
Conus  emersoni  Hanna,  1963 


John  K.  Tucker 

llliiKiis  Natural  Histur\  Survey 

LTRMP 

P.O.  Bo.\  36S 

West  Alton,  MO  63386,  USA 


James  H.  McLean 

Natural  History  of 

Los  Angeles  County 
900  E.xposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Conus  emersoni  is  reported  from  310  ni  off  Isla  Sanla  Maria 
(Floreana),  Galapagos  Islands,  the  first  record  subsequent  to  its 
original  description.  The  species  is  redescribed  from  eight  ad- 
ditional specimens;  its  operculum,  raduia,  and  periostracum 
are  described  for  the  first  time.  Affinity  of  the  species  to  C. 
teramachii  Kuroda,  1956,  is  discussed. 

Key  words:  Conidae,  Contis  emersoni.  Galapagos  Islands,  rad- 
uia. 


INTRODUCTION 

Subsequent  to  its  description  29  years  ago  (Hanna,  1963) 
from  two  dead,  faded  and  poorly  preserved  specimens, 
Conus  emersoni  has  remained  an  enigmatic  member  of 
an  otherwise  extensively  studied  genus  in  the  Eastern 
Pacific  region.  Even  as  he  proposed  the  species,  Hanna 
(1963)  suggested  that  it  might  be  conspecific  with  the 
Indo-West  Pacific  species  C.  australis  Holten,  1802, 
whereas  Walls  (1979)  placed  it  as  a  possible  synonym  of 
another  Indo-West  Pacific  species,  C.  orbigniji  Audouin, 
1831.  Keen  (1971)  treated  the  species  as  valid  but  made 
no  comments  on  its  relationships.  Finally.  Coomans  et 
al.  (1986)  considered  it  to  be  a  tentatively  valid  species 
but  noted  that  it  could  be  based  on  fossil  material. 

Here  we  report  upon  eight  recently  collected  speci- 
mens from  moderately  deep  water  at  the  Galapagos  Is- 
lands, two  of  which  are  in  the  collections  of  the  Natural 
History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles  County  and  six  in  the 
American  Museum  of  Natural  History.  All  were  provided 
by  Andre  and  Jacqueline  DeRoy,  residents  of  the  Ga- 
lapagos Islands.  These  specimens  extend  the  distribution 
from  Cabo  San  Lucas,  Baja  California  Sur,  to  the  Ga- 
lapagos Islands,  Ecuador,  and  allow  a  redescription  of 
the  species  with  the  first  report  on  the  morphology  of 
the  radular  tooth,  the  operculum,  and  the  periostracum. 

Abbreviations  of  museums  mentioned  in  the  text: 
AMNH,  American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  New 
York;  CAS,  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  San  Fran- 
cisco; LACM,  Natural  History  Museum  of  Los  Angeles 
County. 


SYSTEMATICS 

Conus  emersoni  Hanna,  1963 
(figures  1-13) 

Contis  emersoni  Hanna,  1963;25,  pi.  1,  fig.  2;  Walls,  1979:776 
[with  unnumbered  figure  of  CAS  paratypej;  Coomans, 
Moolenbeek  &  Wils,  1986:11-4,  fig.  718  [holotype,  2  views]. 

Conus  (Asprella)  emersoni.  Keen,  1971:663.  fig.  1497  [holo- 
type]. 

Diagnosis:  Spire  scalariform  throughout  its  length, 
shoulder  angle  retaining  square  nodules;  sculpture  on 
final  whorl  of  numerous,  closely  spaced,  shallow  sulci; 
posterior  notch  shallow;  whorl  tops  sculptured  by  one  to 
two  cords  that  fade  in  whorl  three  to  be  replaced  by 
numerous  fine  striae. 

Description:  Shell  elongate-conical,  whorl  sides  flat  to 
very  slightly  convex;  shoulder  angular.  Anterior  end  not 
deflected  dorsally.  Sculpture  of  numerous  (30-50)  closely 
spaced,  shallow  sulci,  most  pronounced  at  anterior  end 
and  fading  in  intensity  towards  shoulder.  Color  pattern 
variable,  consisting  of  three  irregularly  developed  bands, 
at  shoulder,  in  area  just  posterior  to  midbody  area,  and 
in  area  just  anterior  to  midbody.  Bands  variously  inter- 
rupted and  scalloped,  producing  reticulate  or  blotched 
pattern;  bands  separated  by  areas  with  rows  of  spiral 
dashes  or  longitudinal  reticulations.  Dashes  and  reticu- 
lations may  be  quite  pronounced  (holotype)  or  lacking 
(Galapagan  specimens).  Anterior  end  marked  by  spirally 
elongated  blotches  or  lines.  Color  markings  in  fresh  spec- 
imens medium  brown,  fading  to  light  brown  in  dead 
specimens. 

Spire  very  slightly  convex  in  profile,  scalariform 
throughout  and  moderately  elevated,  carinate,  carina 
interrupted  by  numerous  square  nodules,  30-40  per  whorl; 
nodules  fading  in  whorl  six  although  carina  may  remain 
pronounced.  Protoconch  unknown  (not  intact  in  any  of 
the  specimens).  One  or  two  spiral  cords  on  first  two  or 
three  teleoconch  whorls,  replaced  on  later  whorls  by 
numerous,  exceedingly  fine  striae.  Whorl  tops  colored 
by  variably  developed  markings,  matching  those  of  body 
whorl,  between  nodules  or  crossing  entire  width  of  whorl 


Page  30 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol,  107,  No.  1 


Figure§  1-7.  Conus  emcrsurii  Hanna,  1963  Figures  1-3.  Type  material  dredged  off  Los  Fraiies,  Baja  California,  depth  549 
111  L  Holotype,  AMNH  1052n,  length  43  0  mm,  faded,  dead-collected  specimen,  lacking  periostracum.  2,  3.  Paratype,  CAS 
12405,  length  49.0  mm,  subfossil  specimen  (surface  gray),  showing  naticid  bore  hole.  Figures  4-7.  Newly  reported  specimens 
dredged  off  Isla  Santa  Maria  (Floreana),  Galapagos  Islands,  Ecuador,  depth  310  m.  4.  AMNH  248261,  length  46.2  mm,  dead- 
collected  specimen.  5.  LACM  146906a,  length  33.3  mm,  live-collected  specimen  with  periostracum  intact.  This  specimen  was  used 
for  opercular  and  radular  illustration.  6.  7.  LAC;M  146906b,  length  34  0  mm,  dead-collected  specimen  with  periostracum  removed 
to  show  color  pattern. 


top.  Whorl  tops  slightly  but  distinctly  concave  in  cross 
section.  Posterior  notch  shallow  and  C-shaped. 

Aperture  narrow,  white  inside  e.xcept  where  exterior 
coloration  shows  through  near  lip.  Interior  constrictions 
and  aperturai  flanges  absent  or  at  least  not  developed  in 
available  specimens. 

Periostracum  thick,  dark  brown,  markedly  pilose  both 
on  body  and  spire.  Extremely  Bne  hairlike  extensions  of 
periostracum  not  organized  into  any  obvious  pattern. 
These  projections  are  apparently  easily  worn  off,  as  they 
are  pronounced  on  the  dorsal  side  of  one  live-collected 
specimen  (figure  5)  but  are  not  obvious  on  the  ventral 
side  of  the  same  specimen. 

Dimensions  (.see  table  I):  The  known  specimens  range 
in  length  from  23.0  mm  to  the  49.0  mm  length  of  the 
paratype  (figures  2,  3).  The  ratio  of  width  to  length  ranges 
from  0.43  to  0.50  (table  1 ).  The  largest  Galapagan  spec- 
imen (figure  4)  is  46.2  mm  in  length.  All  specimens  have 
the  protoconch  eroded,  the  spire  tips  filled  by  secondary 
shell  deposition. 

Operculuni  illustrated  in  figure  8  is  27%  of  aperturai 
length,  weakly  serrate  on  outer  edge. 

Kadular  tooth  (figures  9-13)  small,  285  jum  in  lengtli; 
massive  base  with  pronounced  basal  spur;  waist  located 
on  anterior  half  of  tooth,  with  small  spine  on  posterior 


border  in  same  plane  as  basal  spur.  Tooth  opening  rather 
long,  extending  about  one-cjuarter  the  length.  Tip  w  ith 
small  barb  opposite  short  blade. 

Distribution:  The  holotype  and  one  paratype  were  col- 
lected oft  Los  Fraiies,  Cape  San  Lucas,  Baja  California 
in  550  m  (given  originally  as  300  fathoms  by  Hanna, 
1963).  The  eight  newly  discovered  specimens  were 
dredged  in  310  m  (170  fathoms)  off  Isla  Santa  Maria 
(Floreana),  Galapagos  Islands,  7  May  1979  by  Andre  and 
Jacqueline  DeRoy  (table  1). 


DISCUSSION 

The  rediscovery  of  Conus  emersoni  in  the  CJalapagos 
Islands  should  put  to  rest  speculation  that  this  species  is 
a  synonym  of  either  Conus  australis  (suggested  by  Han- 
na, 1963)  or  C.  orbignyi  (suggested  by  Walls,  1979).  Each 
of  these  Indo-Pacific  species  is  unlike  C.  emersoni  in 
having  persistent  sulci  on  the  body  whorl  along  with 
persistent  cords  on  the  spire  \\  horl  tops.  C'onus  emersoni 
differs  in  having  the  sulci  strong  only  anteriorly  and  in 
having  fine  spiral  striae  on  the  whorl  tops.  Radular  dif- 
ferences are  that  the  radular  tooth  of  C.  orbignyi  has 
three  anterior  barbs  (Kilburii,  1973:  fig  6),  whereas  that 


J.  K.  Tucker  and  J.  H.  McLean,  1993 


Page  31 


.-H* 


W^ 


» 


m0 


10 


11 


Figures  8-13.  Conus  emcrsoni  Hanna,  1963  8.  Operculum,  same  specimen  as  figure  5,  length  7  3  mm,  nucleus  lost.  Figures 
9-13.  SEM  views  of  single  radular  toolli,  length  285  m'".  from  same  specimen  as  in  figure  .5.  SEM  photos  by  H.  Chaney  9. 
Oblique  anterior  view  showing  apical  surface,  with  pronounced  basal  spur  and  small  spine  on  posterior  border  of  waist.  10.  Enlarged 
view  of  apical  surface,  with  small  barb  and  enrolled  blade.  11-13.  Three  lateral  views,  showing  differing  axial  rotation  of  tooth 


of  C.  emersoni  has  but  two.  The  radular  tooth  of  C. 
australis  has  a  serrate  shaft  along  with  an  enlarged  cusp 
at  the  posterior  end  of  the  row  of  serrations  (A.  J.  Kohn, 
radular  slide  collection);  neither  feature  is  present  on  the 
radular  tooth  of  C.  emersoni. 

The  scalariform  spire  and  color  markings  of  Conus 
emersoni  have  a  superficial  resemblance  to  that  of  the 
Panamic  species  C.  emarginatus  Reeve,  1844  (a  species 
often  misidentified  as  C.  recurvus  Broderip,  1833).  Dif- 
ferences are  that  C.  emarginatus  has  a  deep  posterior 
notch  (rather  than  shallow  notch)  and  a  smooth  (rather 
than  pilose)  periostracum.  The  radula  of  C.  emarginatus 
(Nybakken,  1970;  fig.  5,  as  Conus  recurvus)  has  three 
barbs  anteriorly,  like  that  of  C.  orbignyi,  rather  than  C. 
emersoni,  in  which  there  are  two  barbs. 

The  scarcity  of  C.  emersoni  may  be  due  to  the  great 
depth  at  which  it  occurs  and  the  paucity  of  sampling  at 
depths  below  300  m. 

It  is  possible  that  the  specimens  from  the  Galapagos 
Islands  are  specifically  or  subspecifically  distinct.  They 
differ  in  color  pattern  (that  of  the  holotype  being  more 
intricate)  and  in  spire  profile  (that  of  the  holotype  ap- 
pearing to  be  more  acute).  However,  such  intraspecific 
differences  in  color  pattern  are  not  uncommon  in  Conus. 
In  fact,  the  faintly  indicated  color  pattern  of  the  paratype 
that  shows  on  the  better  preserved  dorsal  surface  (figure 
3)  is  more  similar  to  that  of  the  Galapagan  specimens 
(figures  5-7)  than  to  that  of  the  holotype  (figure  1).  The 
ground  color  of  the  paratype  has  a  gray  cast  that  is 
suggestive  of  fossil  or  subfossil  condition.  The  holotype 
is  in  fresher  condition,  although  it  retains  no  periostra- 


cum; it  shows  evidence  of  growth  damage  to  the  shoulder 
at  a  stage  two  whorls  above  the  termination  of  the  lip, 
which  appears  to  have  altered  the  profile  of  the  final  two 
whorls,  resulting  in  a  greater  downward  slope  to  the  spire 
and  the  loss  of  the  nodules  in  the  final  two  whorls. 

The  question  as  to  whether  the  two  widely  disjunct 
records  represent  the  same  species  can  only  be  answered 
after  additional  specimens  from  the  vicinity  of  the  type 
locality  become  known.  It  is  our  opinion,  based  on  the 
specimens  examined,  that  there  is  no  clear  evidence  to 
suggest  that  the  Galapagan  specimens  are  not  conspecific 
with  the  Mexican  specimens. 

Conus  emersoni  is  not  closely  similar  to  any  other 
eastern  Pacific  conid.  Shell  morphology,  including  the 


Table  1 .    Shell  dimensions  and  proportions  of  the  known  spec- 
imens of  Conus  emersoni  Hanna,  1963. 


Width/ 

Specimen 

C:ondition 

Length 

Width 

length 

AMNH  92200  (holotvpe 

dead 

43.0 

18.5 

0.43 

CAS  1240.5  (paratype) 

subfossil 

49.0 

22.5 

0.46 

LACM  l-)6906a 

live 

33.9 

17.0 

0.50 

LAC:M  146906b 

dead 

340 

15.5 

0.46 

AMNH  248262 

live 

35.0 

15.7 

0.45 

AMNH  248263 

live 

31.5 

14.3 

0  45 

AMNH  248261 

dead 

46.2 

22.3 

0.48 

AMNH  248169a 

live 

23.0 

10.8 

0.47 

AMNH  248169b 

dead 

30.0 

149 

0.50 

AMNH  248169c 

live 

26  8 

12  8 

0.48 

Page  32 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


14 


15 


Figures  14,  15.  Conus  teramachii  Kuroda,  1956  14.  Speci- 
men with  growth  scar  producing  lowered  shoulder  angle  of 
final  whorl,  periostracum  removed.  Off  NE  coast  Taiwan, 
trawled,  depth  unknown.  LACM  68994,  length  79  8  mm.  15. 
Operculum  with  strongly  serrate  edge,  nucleus  lost,  trawled  off 
Taiwan.  Specimen  in  H.  Chaney  collection,  length  19.1  mm. 

shoulder  carina  with  square  nodules,  is  similar  to  that  of 
C.  teramachii  Kuroda,  1956  (figure  14),  a  species  re- 
ported from  similar  depths  off  Japan  and  Taiwan  (Ku- 
roda, 1956;  Walls,  1979).  Our  illustrations  of  the  radular 
tooth  of  C.  emersoni  (figures  9-13)  are  comparable  to 
those  of  Azuma  (1961:  fig.  11)  for  C.  teramachii  (as  C. 
petricosus  Azuma,  1961).  In  addition,  C.  teramachii  also 
has  a  strongly  serrate  operculum  (figure  15),  much  more 
pronounced  than  that  of  C.  emersoni  (figure  8).  The 
character  state  of  the  serrate  operculum  was  stressed  in 
the  original  diagnosis  of  the  subgenus  Profundiconus 
Kuroda,  1956 — type  species  Chehjconus  {Profundico- 
nus) profundorum  Kuroda,  1956  [=  Conus  smirna 
Bartsch  and  Rehder,  1943].  The  type  species  of  Profun- 
diconus also  has  square  nodules  on  the  shoulder  carina, 
but  these  are  apparent  only  in  young  stages. 

We  refrain,  however,  from  further  treatment  of  the 
subgeneric  allocation  of  the  species  under  discussion  be- 


cause comparison  to  other  available  generic  level  taxa  is 
beyond  the  scope  of  this  paper.  We  recognize  that  a 
generic  level  classification  of  Conidae  needs  to  be  based 
on  all  the  recognized  species,  including  fossils,  at  a  min- 
imum treating  characters  that  include  adult  and  juvenile 
shell  morphology,  and,  for  the  living  species,  the  oper- 
culum, and  radula. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  thank  Alan  J.  Kohn  of  the  L'niversity  of  Washington 
for  allowing  one  of  us  (JKT)  to  study  his  radular  slide  of 
C.  australis.  William  K.  Emerson  and  Walter  E.  Sage  of 
the  American  Museum  of  Natural  History  made  the  ho- 
lotype  and  other  specimens  of  C.  emersoni  available  for 
study.  Terrence  M.  Gosliner  of  the  California  Academy 
of  Sciences  arranged  for  loan  of  the  paratype  specimen. 
We  thank  Henry  W.  Chaney  of  the  Santa  Barbara  Mu- 
seum of  Natural  History  for  the  SEM  photos  of  the  rad- 
ular tooth  of  C.  emersoni  and  the  photograph  of  the 
operculum  of  C.  teramachii.  We  are  grateful  to  Henry 
W,  Chaney,  William  K.  Emerson,  Alan  J.  Kohn  and 
Walter  E.  Sage  and  two  anonymous  referees  for  reading 
the  manuscript  and  offering  helpful  suggestions.  Finally, 
and  most  importantly,  we  thank  Jacqueline  and  Andre 
DeRoy  for  providing  the  specimens  of  C.  emersoni  that 
form  the  basis  for  this  paper. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Azuma,  M.  1961.  Descriptions  of  six  new  species  of  Japanese 
marine  Gastropoda.  Venus  21(3):296-303. 

Coomans,  H  E.,  R.  G.  Moolenbeek,  and  E.  Wils.  1986.  Al- 
phabetical revision  of  the  (sub)species  in  recent  Conidae. 
9.  ehraeus  to  extraordinaritis  with  the  description  of  Conus 
elegans  remalhoi.  nov.  subspecies.  Basteria50;93-1.59,  figs. 
667-760. 

Hanna,  G.  D.  1963.  West  American  mollusks  ot  the  genus 
Conus — II.  California  Academy  of  Sciences,  Occasional 
Papers,  no.  35,  103  p.,  11  pis. 

Keen,  A.  M.  1971.  Sea  shells  of  tropical  West  America,  second 
edition.  Stanford  University  Press,  Stanford,  C.-^,  1064  p. 

Kilburn,  R.  N.  1973  Notes  on  some  benthic  Mollusca  from 
Natal  and  Mozambique  with  descriptions  of  new  species 
and  subspecies  of  Calliostoma,  SolarieUa.  Latiaxis.  Bab- 
ylonia, Fusinus.  Bathytoma  and  Conus.  Annals  of  the 
Natal  Museum  2I(3):557-578,  figs.  1-17. 

Kuroda,  T.  1956.  New  species  of  the  Conidae  (Gastropoda) 
from  Japan.  Venus  19(1):  1-13,  1  pi. 

Nybakken,  J.  1970.  Radular  anatomy  and  systematics  of  the 
West  .'\merican  Conidae  (Mollusca,  Gastropoda).  Ameri- 
can Museum  Novitates  2414:1-29,  figs.  1-45. 

Walls,  J.  G.  1979.  Cone  shells,  a  synopsis  of  the  living  Conidae. 
T.  F.  H.  Publications,  Inc.,  Neptune  City,  NJ,  1011  p. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(l):33-42,  1993 


Page  33 


The  Benthic  Mollusk  Faunas  of  Two  Contrasting  Reef 
Paleosubenvironments:  Falmouth  Formation  (late  Pleistocene, 
Last  Interglacial),  Jamaica 


Stephen  K.  Donovan 

Department  iil  Ch'iiIoi;\ 
University  of  the  West  Indies 
Mona,  Kingston  7  JAMAICA 


D.T.J.  Littlewood' 

Haskin  Shellfish  Heseareh  Laboratory 

Institute  of  Marine  and  Coastal 

Sciences 

Cook  College/ NJ  A  ES 

P.O.  Box  B-8 

Port  Norris,  New  Jersey  0S349  l!SA 


ABSTRACT 

The  last  interglacial  (about  125,000  years  old)  raised  reefs  of 
the  Falmouth  Formation  of  Jamaica  contain  a  diverse  fauna 
of  benthic  mollusks.  Large  collections  of  mollusks  ha\e  been 
made  from  two  contrasting  reef  localities  and  paleosubenvi- 
ronments. Calcareous  muds  of  lagoonal  origin  were  well-ce- 
mented, biassing  collecting  tow  ards  larger  individuals,  whereas 
poorlv-cemented  santly  sediments  of  a  coral  framework  were 
friable  and  thus  amenable  to  bulk  sampling,  yielding  numerous 
micromoUusks.  Identification  of  over  3,000  bivalve,  gastropod 
and  scaphopod  specimens  shows  the  molluscan  faunas  of  each 
environment  to  be  dominated  by  different  species.  The  coral 
framework  fauna  is  numerically  dominated  b\  the  microgas- 
tropod  Caecitm  piilchcllinu  Stimpson,  1851,  other  epifaunal 
gastropods  and  arks,  while  Bulla  .striata  Bruguiere,  1792  and 
ceriths  dominate  the  lagoonal  sediments.  Only  Cerithium  al- 
gicola  C.B.  ,^dams,  1848,  forms  more  than  2";  of  the  fauna  at 
both  localities.  17%  of  the  extant  species  (27%  of  the  common 
species)  of  shallow  water  benthic  mollusks  (excluding  chitons) 
from  Jamaica  have  been  identified  from  these  two  localities. 

Key  words    Late  Pleistocene;  benthic  reef  mollusks;  Jamaica. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  present  paper  is  a  preliminary  report  of  the  mol- 
luscan faunas  from  the  late  Pleistocene  (the  last  inter- 
glacial or  Sangamonian)  Falmouth  Formation  (125,000 
years  B.P.)  of  northern  Jamaica.  The  mollusks  of  the 
Falmouth  Formation  are  important  for  two  principal 
reasons.  Firstly,  the  Neogene  and  Quaternary  fossilif- 
erous  deposits  of  Jamaica  contain  a  diverse  fauna  of 
benthic  mollusks  that  have  hitherto  been  largely  ignored 


'  Current  address;  Department  of  Palaeontology,  British  Mu- 
seum (Natural  Historv),  Cromwell  Road,  London.  S\V7  5BD, 
ENGLAND 


by  systematists.  Indeed,  only  the  famous  Pliocene  Bow- 
den  shell  bed  in  southeastern  Jamaica  (Woodring,  1925, 
1928)  and  the  fauna  of  the  Early  Pleistocene  Manchi- 
oneal  Formation  (Trechmann,  1930)  have  so  far  received 
monographic  treatment.  This  lack  of  published  infor- 
mation does  not  reflect  the  true  diversity  of  the  mollusk 
faunas  through  this  interval  and  ma\  thus  prove  mis- 
leading to  workers  not  familiar  with  the  geology  of  the 
island.  For  example,  Petuch  (1988:49)  considered  that 
there  are  few  exposures  of  Miocene  age  preserved  within 
the  Caribbean  and  South  American  region,  and  did  not 
include  Jamaica  in  his  list  of  productive  sites,  yet  in  a 
preliminary  survey  Jung  (1972)  listed  members  of  19 
genera  from  the  extensive  deposits  of  the  Newport  For- 
mation (Lower  and  Middle  Miocene)  of  the  island. 

Further,  molluscan  faunas  from  last  interglacial  reefs 
(and  other  Pleistocene  marine  environments;  Valentine, 
1989)  can  be  a  valuable  adjunct  to  studies  of  extant  as- 
semblages from  the  shallow  benthos  (but  see  cautionary 
comments  in  Johnson,  1960).  The  Pleistocene  raised  reefs 
of  the  Caribbean  region  are  recognised  to  include  large 
faunas  of  fossil  mollusks  (see,  for  example,  Cerridwen  & 
Jones,  1991).  Unlike  those  of  certain  other  areas  (such 
as  Aldabra  Atoll;  Taylor,  1978),  Caribbean  mollusk  fau- 
nas have  apparently  changed  little  since  the  last  inter- 
glacial (Petuch,  1988:119),  an  observation  that  may  have 
important  implications  for  the  study  of  faunal  associa- 
tions in  Recent  reefs  and  associated  environments.  Mol- 
lusk faunas  in  various  biofacies  w  ithin  Pleistocene  raised 
reefs  are  generalK  easy  to  sample,  outcropping  adjacent 
to  the  coast  on  many  Caribbean  islands,  thus  permitting 
large  collections  to  be  made  for  systematic  and  paleo- 
ecological  analysis. 

Geology  and  geological  nomenclalure:  The  Falmouth 
Formation  in  the  Discovery  Bay-Rio  Bueno  Harbour  re- 
gion of  Jamaica's  northern  coast  (figures  1-3)  rests  un- 
conformably  on  the  dolomitized  Plio-Pleistocene  reef 
(Land,  1991)  of  the  Hopegate  Fonnation.  Lithofacies 


Page  34 


THE  NAUTILUS.  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


2 

1^ 

^ 

^ 

0 

km 

1 

'   ^-— 

^^=^^8=- 

^^2 

\ 

^    ^ 

1^          ^^ 

% 

■^1 

DB      Jy 

^"¥1 

i 

,54-70 

^) 

Ftl 

W/!?\  TerrigencHJS  grainstcxie  facies 
Mi::::iij  Mdluscan  algal  gralnstone  facies 
pt'«';1  Mdkjscan  biomlcritic  wackestone  fades 
f     n  Biomicritic  packstone  facies 
I        I  Coralline  boundstone  facies 
Hopegate  Formation 


Figures  1-3.  Maps  ol  slud)  arta;.  1  Outline  map  uf  JamaiLa,  showing  the  location  of  the  Discovery  Bay  (DB)  region  with  respect 
to  Kingston  (K),  Montego  Bay  (MB)  and  Ocho  Rios  (OR)  2  Topographic  map  of  the  Discovery  Bay-Rio  Bueno  Harbour  (RBH) 
area,  showing  the  positions  of  localities  1  and  2.  Contours  in  m.  3  Geological  map  of  the  Discover)  Bay-Rio  Bueno  Harbour  area 
(redrawn  after  Larson.  19So:  figure  6).  showing  the  relative  distributions  of  the  major  sedimentary  facies  of  the  Falmouth  Formation 
in  relation  to  the  underK  ing  Hopegate  Formation  (key  right). 


within  the  Falmouth  Formation  reef  (Larson.  1983)  con- 
tain associated  distinct  faunal  assemblages  which  have 
been  recognised  from  the  evidence  of  corals  (Larson. 
1983:  Liddell  et  ai.  1984)  and  echinoids  (Gordon  & 
Donovan.  1992). 

History  of  research:  Hill  (1899)  named  the  Falmouth 
Formation,  and  recognized  the  essential  elements  of  the 
mollusk  fauna  to  comprise  Lucina,  Cardium.  Area.  So- 
len  and  Bulla.  Hill  (1899.  155)  considered  this  fauna  to 
be  worthv-  of  careful  stud\  b\  paleontologists,  an  invi- 
tation that  has  not  been  taken  up  in  over  90  \  ears.  Rob- 
inson (1958)  noted  Area  spp.  from  the  elevated  reef  at 
east  Rio  Bueno  Harbour  (localitv  1  herein),  and  Chione 
cancellata  (Linnaeus.  1767)  and  Bulla  cf.  striata  Bru- 
guiere.  1792.  from  the  lagoonal  facies  east  and  west  of 
Falmouth.  Parish  of  Trelawny  (probabh  lithologicalK- 
similar  to  locality  2  herein).  In  1960.  Robinson  considered 
the  Falmouth  Formation  in  the  Parish  of  St.  .Ann  to 
include  the  moUusks  Lueina.  Codakia.  Chione  and  Bul- 
la, and  later  commented  that  this  rich  fauna  is  identical 
with  the  living  fauna  of  the  Jamaican  coastal  waters 
(Robinson.  19&3:52).  Recent  studies  of  the  fossil  scapho- 
pods  of  Jamaica  (Donovan  and  Littlewood.  1989;  Don- 
ovan, 1990)  ha\e  recognised  Dentalium  sp.  cf.  D.  (An- 
atalis)  antillarum  d'Orbigny,  1842,  and  D.  (Graptacme) 
semistriolatum  Guilding.  18;34.  from  the  east  Rio  Bueno 
Harbour  locality. 

The  specimens  discussed  herein  are  deposited  in  the 
Department  of  Palaeontology,  British  Museum  (Natural 
History).  For  uncertainties  in  our  taxonomic  assignments 
(particularly  for  poorly  preserved  or  fragmentary  spec- 


imens), we  have  used  question  marks  thus:  Agenus  ?spe- 
cies  signifies  that  we  are  uncertain  of  the  specific  assig- 
nation: ? Agenus  aspeeies  indicates  that  some  doubt  exists 
concerning  the  generic  land.  thus,  also  specific!  assign- 
ment. This  differs  in  detail,  but  not  in  spirit,  from  the 
recommendations  of  Bengston  (1988). 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

The  Falmouth  Formation  of  the  Discovery  Bay-Rio  Bueno 
Harbour  area  has  been  subdivided  into  five  principal 
reef al  subenv  ironments  by  Larson  (1983;  figure  3  herein). 
Large  collections  of  benthic  mollusks  were  made  from 
two  contrasting  paleosubenvironments  ^localities  1  and 
2,  described  below)  within  this  continuum.  These  par- 
ticular subenvironments  and  localities  were  chosen  be- 
cause of  their  large  mollusk  faunas  and  easy  access.  The 
mollusk  collections  from  each  locality  were  made  over 
a  period  of  22  months,  from  .April  19SS  imtil  February 
1990.  Both  collections  are  time-averaged,  having  been 
collected  from  float,  the  rock  face  and  as  bulk  samples 
from  throughout  2-4  m  of  section  in  each  case,  as  bedding 
planes  and  other  obvious  time  marker  horizons  are  not 
apparent.  Howev  er.  the  \  alue  of  collecting  mollusks  from 
discrete  beds  (e\ en  when  preserved)  within  reefs  is  de- 
batable, as  at  an\  one  time  the  fauna  w  ill  include  shallow 
and  deep  infaunal.  sediment  surface  epifaunal.  and  (in 
the  case  of  the  three-dimensional  coral  framework  at 
localitv  1)  epifaunal  taxa  living  well  above  the  soft  sed- 
iment surface. 

Specimens  collected  in  the  field  were  generally  at  least 


S.  K.  Donovan  and  D.  T.  J.  Littlewood,  1993 


Page  35 


.y  .■^. 


J'-^ 


■->^  ^  ,       x# 

^       ^:.'^' 

-<;               :^<' 

^-ii-rv-^is*;    ' 

m 
a. 


Figures  4-7.  Field  photographs  of  molhisks  of  the  Falmouth  Formation  4-.  Stromhus  gigas  Linnaeus,  1758,  at  locahty  1;  0.3  x. 
5-7.  LocalitN'  2,  5,  MainK  Bulla  striata  Bruguiere,  1792;  0  6  x.  6.  General  view  of  weathered  surface  showing  abundant  (mainly 
molluscan)  shell  hash;  0.6  x  7.  MainK  Bulla  striata  Bruguiere,  1792,  associated  with  an  articulated  shell  (arrowed)  of  Chione 
paphia  (Linnaeus,  1767);  0.4  x. 


5  mm  in  maximum  dimension  and  even  shells  of  this 
size  were  easily  overlooked  without  repeated  scanning 
of  a  limited  area  at  a  time.  It  proved  much  easier  to 
detect  small  specimens  during  laboratory  analysis  using 
a  Wild  binocular  microscope.  Preliminary  field  identi- 
fications were  checked  in  the  laboratory  using  standard 
taxonomic  references,  including  Abbott  (1954,  1958, 
1974),  de  Jong  and  Coomans  (1988),  Fisher  (1988),  Hum- 
frey  (1975),  Morris  (1987),  Vaught  (1989),  and  Warmke 
and  Abbott  (1961).  Total  numbers  of  whole  shells  and 
(for  bivaUes)  disarticulated  valves  are  tabulated  \\'hole 
shell  equivalents  (discussed  in  Cerridwen  and  Jones,  1991 ) 
were  used  in  calculating  relative  proportions  of  moUusks 
for  graphical  analysis. 

Locality  1 

(Locality  7  of  Liddell  et  a/.,  1984;  locality  3  of  Donovan 

6  Gordon,  1989).  East  side  of  Rio  Bueno  Harbour,  Parish 
of  St.  Ann,  with  the  Falmouth  Formation  exposed  as  a 
line  of  low  cliffs  (GR  394  572).  At  this  locality  the  un- 
conformable contact  with  the  underlying,  dolomitised 
Hope  Gate  Formation  (figure  3)  formed  the  hard  sub- 
strate for  Falmouth  Formation  reef  growth.  Previous 
interpretations  have  considered  this  locality  to  represent 
either  a  patch  reef  in  the  back  reef  lagoon  within  the 
molluscan  biomicritic  wackestone  facies  sensii  lato  (Lar- 
son, 1983;  figure  3  herein)  or  perhaps  part  of  the  shallow- 
fore  reef  (Robinson,  1958;  Liddell  et  a!.,  1984). 

Mollusk-rich  sediments  at  this  locality  occur  beneath 
an  altered  caliche  cap  (Land  &  Epstein,  1970)  in  a  frame- 
work of  shallow-water  corals,  particularly  Porites  spp. 
and  Acropora  spp.  (Liddell  et  al.,  1984:  77).  The  matrix 
between  corals  is  a  friable,  weakly-cemented  carbonate 
sand  which  includes  a  diverse  benthic  fauna,  including 


echinoid  (Gordon  &  Donovan,  1992)  and  ophiuroid 
(Donovan  et  al.,  in  press)  ossicles,  crabs  (Morris,  in  press), 
disarticulated  chiton  valves  (Donovan  et  al.,  research  in 
progress),  scaphopods  (Donovan  &  Littlewood,  1989; 
Donovan,  1990),  gastropods  and  bivalves.  Due  to  the 
friable  nature  of  the  sediment,  two  collecting  methods 
were  used.  Firstly,  mollusk  specimens  that  were  weath- 
ering out  of  the  exposed  face  (figure  4)  were  removed 
manuallv.  The  fauna  collected  by  this  method  was  dom- 
inated by  bivalves  and  gastropods,  with  three  scaphopod 
shells.  Secondly ,  bulk  samples  were  collected  by  the  bag- 
ful. In  the  laboratory  these  samples  were  emptied  into 
shallow  trays,  dried  in  an  oven  overnight,  then  washed 
through  a  nest  of  sieves  using  cold  water  and  redried. 
Sieved  aliquots  were  then  picked  by  ey  e  (coarse  fractions) 
or  under  the  binocular  microscope  (fine  fractions:  frac- 
tions finer  than  coarse  sand  were  not  picked).  The  fauna 
collected  by  this  method  was  dominated  by  bivalves, 
gastropods  and  (in  the  finer  fractions  examined)  chiton 
valves,  but  no  further  scaphopods  were  found.  A  total  of 
1669  benthic  mollusks  (excluding  chiton  valves;  Donovan 
et  al.,  research  in  progress)  have  been  identified  from 
this  locality  (table  1). 

Locality  2 

(Locality  5  of  Liddell  et  al.,  1984).  This  is  an  outcrop  of 
hard,  fine-grained,  well-lithified,  but  occasionally  chalky, 
limestone  exposed  along  the  shoreline  as  a  low  terrace 
east  of  the  Discovery  Bay  Marine  Laboratory,  Parish  of 
St.  Ann  (GR  405  569).  This  lithology  has  been  interpreted 
as  having  been  formed  in  a  back  reef  environment  (Lid- 
dell et  al.,  1984:76),  presumably  a  lagoon,  forming  part 
of  the  molluscan  biomicritic  wackestone  facies  sensu 
stricto  of  Larson  (1983;  figure  3  herein). 


Page  36 THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107.  No.  1 

Table  1.  Mollusk  fauna  collected  from  locality  1,  east  of  Rio  Bueno  Harbour.  Key:  *  =  includes  11  juveniles,  plus  2  shells  not 
collected;  **  =  with  apparent  growth  deformity;  +  =  vaKe  incomplete;  ++  =  probably  mostly  Area  iiiibricala  Bruguiere;  S  = 
shells  or  identifiable  shell  fragments;  \'  =  valves;  LV  =  left  valve;  RV  =  right  valve;  O  =  operculum;  J  =  juvenile  shells. 


Gastropods 

Diodora  listen  (d'Orbigny,  1853)  25S 

Diodora  '^caijencnsis  (Lamarck,  1822)  12S 

Diodora  '■'mintitn  (Lamarck,  1822)  IS 

Fi.ssiirclla  harhadcnsis  (Gmelin,  1791)  IS 

Acinuea  ?(inlillarinn  (Sowvrhy,  1831)  IS 

Acmaea  pustidata  (Helbling,  1779)  60S 

Cittarium  pica  (Linnaeus,  1758)  ,3S 

Tegula  fasciata  (Born,  1778)  ,3S 

Astraea  ?caelata  (Gmelin,  1791)  lO 

Astraea  tccta  (Solander,  1786)  4S 

Nerita  versicolor  Gmelin,  1791  IS 

Nerita  tessellala  Gmelin,  1791  2S 

Nerita  sp.  indet,  j^S 

Neritina  virginea  (Linnaeus,  1758)  IS 

Neritina  punctulata  Lamarck.  1816  2S 

Littorina  ?nebulosa  Lamarck.  1822  2S 

Alvania  ?aberrans  C.  B.  Adams,  1850  IS 

Heliacus  injundibulijormis  (Gmelin.  1791)  IS 

Petaloconchus  irregularis  (d'Orbigny,  1842)  2S 

Petaloconchus  erecius  Dall,  1888  IS 

Petaloconchus  mcgintyi  Olsson  and  Harbison,  1953  2S 

Serpulorbis  decussata  (CmeYm,  1791)  5S 

Serpulorlris  ?decussata  (Gmelin,  1791)  IS 

Serpulorbis  ?riisei  (Morch,  1862)  IS 

Caecum  ?insularum  Moore,  1970  IS 

Caecum  plicatum  Carpenter,  1858  IS 

Caecum  pulchcllum  Stimpson,  1851  657S 

Modulus  modulus  (Linnaeus,  1758)  13S 

Cerithium  ''litteratum  (Born,  1778)  7S 

Cerithium  guinaicum  Philippi,  1849  3S 

Cerithium  ?eburneum  Bruguiere,  1792  2S 

Cerithium  algicola  C.  B.  Adams,  1848  92S 

Cerithium  sp.  3S 

Cerithium  sp.  indet.  3S 

Hipponix  antiquatus  (lAnna.eus,  1767)  ,3,3S 

Strombus  gigas  Linnaeus,  1758  *  36S 

Cypraea  zebra  Linnaeus,  1758  Ij 

Cypraea  cinerea  Gmelin,  1791  2S 

Polinices  lacteus  (Guilding,  1834)  9S 

Morum  oniscus  (Linnaeus,  1767)  3S 

Cymatium  'pileare'  (Linnaeus,  1767)  IJ 

?Cymatium  nicobariciim  (Roding.  1798)  IJ 

Cymatium  ?parthenopeum  (von  Salis,  1793)  5S 

Cymatium  sp.  sensu  lata  H 

^Cymatium  sp.  \\ 

Bursa  cubaniarui  (d'Orbigny,  1842)  IJ 

Columbclla  mercatoria  (Linnaeus,  1758)  81S 

F.ngoniophos  'hmicinctus  (Say,  1826)  IS 

?Melongena  mclongena  (Linnaeus,  1881)  2S 

Fasciolaria  tulipa  (Linnaeus,  1758)  2S 

Latirus  ?hrevicaudatus  Reeve,  1847  IS 

Leucozonia  nassa  (Gmelin,  1791)  17S 

Mitra  barbadensis  (Gmelin,  1791)  6S 

Hyalina  avena  (Kiener,  1834)  IS 

Conus  sp.  or  spp.  3S 

?Mangelia  quadrdim-ata  (C.  B.  Adam.s,  1850)  2S 

Bulla  striata  Bruguiere,  1792  2S 

Odostomia  sp.  or  Pyramldella  sp.  IS 

Cheilia  equestris  (Linnaeus,  1758)  IS 

Total  1,1.3() 


S.  K.  Donovan  and  D.  T,  J.  Littlewood,  1993 


Page  37 


Table  1.    ('diitiniird 


Bivalves 
Area  ?zebra  Swainson.  18S3 
Area  imhricuta  Bruguiere,  1789 
Rarlxititi  Candida  (Helbling,  1779) 
Barlmtia  ?cancellaria  (Lamarck,  1819) 
Barhatia  teiwra  (C   B.  Adams,  1845) 
Anadara  sp 
.■\rks  iiuiet.  +  + 

Brachidonti's  cxustus  (Linnaeus,  1758) 
Smoolli  '•'Botida  fuaca  (Gmelin,  1791) 
iJthophaga  ''nigra  (d'Orbigny,  1842) 
hognomvn  '•'alalua  (CJmelin,  1791) 
hognomon  radiatus  (Anton,  1839) 
Isognonwn  sp,  indet 
Lima  scabra  (Born,  1778) 
Ostreola  equestris  Say,  1834 
Codakia  orbicularis  (Linnaeus,  1758) 
Codakia  ?orbiculata  (Montagu,  1808) 
''Codakia  sp, 

Chama  maccrophylla  Gmelin.  1791 
Chama  '''maccrophylla  Gmelin,  1791 
Pseudochatua  radians  (Lamarck,  1819) 
Americardia  media  (Linnaeus,  1758) 
Americardia  guppyi  (Thiele,  1910) 
Chione  cancellata  (Linnaeus,  1767) 
Pcrighjpta  listeri  (Gray,  1838) 
Tellina  listeri  Boding,  1798 
Tellina  sp-  cf,  Tellina  ''tnera  Sa\,  1834 
Tellins  indet. 
Tellinacean  sp,  indet.  A 
Tellinacean  sp,  indet   B 
?Tellinacean  sp,  indet.** 
Areopagia  Jausta  (Pulteney,  1799) 
?Macoma  pseudomera  Dall  and  Simpson,  1901 
?Macoma  sp. 

PLucinid  or  ?pectinacean  indet. 
?Mactracean  indet, 
?Periploma  papyralium  Say,  1822 
Bivalve  sp   indet. 

Scaphopods 
Dentalium  sp  cf.  Dentalium  (Anatalis) 
antillanim  d'Orbigny,  1842 
Dentalium  (Graptaeme)  semistriolatum  CJuilding,  1834 


9V  + 


1V  + 
1V  + 


1V  + 


1V  + 


Totals 


4LV 

77LV 
25LV 

ILV 
36LV 

ILV 
32LV 

4LV 


ILV 

lOLV 

4LV 
ILV 

2LV 
ILV 
9LV 
4LV 


ILV 
ILV 

ILV 
2LV 
2LV 
ILV 

3LV 

28LV 


2LV 


61RV 

37  RV 

4RV 

24RV 

29RV 


2RV 


5RV 

2RV 
IRV 

13RV 
6RV 
IRV 
IRV 

IRV 
IRV 


5RV 

IRV 
IRV 
35RV 
IRV 
IRV 

IRV 
IRV 
IRV 
502V 


19S 

IS 
IS 

2S 

IS 
IS 


3S 


6S 


Total 


33S 


IS 
2S 

3S 


Because  of  the  well-lithified  nature  of  much  of  this 
limestone,  it  was  necessary  to  use  a  hammer  and  chisel 
to  remove  all  specimens  seen  in  the  exposed  faces  (figures 
5-7).  Specimens  were  not  apparent  on  all  surfaces  due 
to  the  vagaries  of  weathering,  although  breaking  open 
many  of  these  'unfossiliferous'  exposures  showed  that 
mollusks  were  nevertheless  common.  As  well  as  collecting 
individual  specimens  in  the  field,  large  fossiliferous  slabs 
containing  dense  accumulations  of  mollusks  were  taken 
back  to  the  laboratory  for  mechanical  breakdown.  A  total 
of  1365  benthic  mollusks  have  been  identified  from  this 
locality  (table  2),  including  abundant  gastropods  and  bi- 
valves, rare  scaphopods,  but  no  chitons. 


RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Taxonomy:  Taxa,  and  number  of  specimens  of  each 
species,  from  localities  1  and  2  are  tabulated  in  tables  1 
and  2,  respectively.  It  is  readily  apparent  that  both  fau- 
nas, although  approximately  contemporaneous  and  sep- 
arated by  a  distance  of  only  about  3  km,  show  consid- 
erable taxonomic  divergence  (figures  8,  9).  Localitv  1 
has  the  more  diverse  fauna,  which  is  dominated  numer- 
ically by  the  micromollusk  Caecum  pulchellutn  Stimp- 
son,  1851,  arks  and  epifaunal  gastropods  (although  C. 
piilchelltim  made  only  a  minute  contribution  to  biomass), 
whereas  locality  2  is  typified  by  the  occurrence  of  abun- 


Page  38 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


Table  2.    MoUusk  fauna  collected  from  locality  2,  east  of  Discovery  Bay  Marine  Laboratory.  Key: ' 
C".  B.  .-Vdams,  1848;  otherwise  as  for  Table  I 


=  encrusting  Cerithium  algicola 


Gastropods 
Diodora  ?cayenensis  (Lamarck,  1822) 
Turbo  canaliciilahi.s  Hermann,  1781 
Tricolia  sp  or  spp. 

?Smaragdia  ciridis  ciridenmris  Maury,  1917 
Rissoina  aberans  (C.  B.  .\dams,  1850) 
'^Rissoina  sp. 

Planaxis  lineatus  (da  Costa,  1778) 
Modulus  carchcdonius  (Lamarck,  1822) 
Modulus  modtdus  (Linnaeus,  1758) 
Cerithium  algicola  C.  B  .\dams.  1848 
Cerithium  eburneum  Bruguiere.  1792 
Cerithium  litteratum  Born,  1778 
Cerithium  spp.  indet.  (fragments) 
Janthina  sp. 

?\iso  portoricensis  Dall  and  Simpson,  1901 
Stromhus  gigas  Linnaeus,  1758 
Polinices  lactcus  (.Guilding,  1834) 
Satica  canrena  (Linnaeus,  1758) 
Naticid  sp.  indet. 

Cymatium  "^caribbaeum  Clench  and  Turner.  1957 
Ctjmatium  muricinum  (Boding,  1798) 
Cymatium  sp.  indet.  .\ 
Cymatium  sp.  indet.  B 
Cymatium  sp  indet.  C 
?Thais  ddtoidea  (Lamarck,  1822) 
Columbella  mercatoria  (Linnaeus.  1758) 
Anachis  obesa  (C.  B.  .\dams.  1845) 
Anachis  ?pretri  (Duclos,  1846) 
Anachis  sp.  indet. 
S'assarius  alhtis  (Say,  1826) 
Fasciolaria  tulipa  (Linnaeus,  1758) 
Oliiella  dealbata  (Ree\e,  1850) 
Prttnuvi  guttatum  (Dill\v\n,  1817) 
?\'olvarina  gracilis  (C   B.  .\dams,  1851) 
CoTius  '^centurio  Born,  1778 
Conus  verrucosus  Hwass,  1792 
?Crassispira  sp.  indet. 
Btdia  striata  Bruguiere,  1792 
Retusa  candci  (d  Orbigiu,  1841) 

Bivalves 
??Suculid  sp.  indet. 
Area  imbricata  Bruguiere,  1789 
Barbatia  cancellaria  (Lamarck.  1819) 
.\rk  indet.  sp. 

Brachidontes  citrinus  (Boding.  1798) 
?lsognomon  sp. 
Pinna  camea  Gmelin.  1791 
Pecten  '^chazaliei  Dautzenberg.  1900 
?Diplodonta  punctata  ^Sa>.  1822) 
Lucina  sp.  indet   .A 
Lucinid  sp.  indet.  .\ 
Lucinids  spp.  indet. 
?Anodontia  alba  Link.  1807 
Codakia  costata  (d"Orbigny.  1842) 
Codakia  orbictdaris  (Linnaeus,  175S) 
Codakia  orbictdata  (Montague.  180S) 
Dicaricella  quadhsulcata  (d"Orbign\ ,  1842) 
Chama  macerophulla  Gmelin,  1791 
Chama  sp 


Total 


ILV 

3RV 

ILV 

IRV 

2L\" 

IRV 

ILV 

IRV 


ILV 


1V  + 


ILV^ 

IRV 

ILV 

2LV 

IRV 

2L\- 

3RV 

3L\ 

3RV 

2LV 

4LV 

3RV 

2RV 

2LV 

2RV 

121.V 

34RV 

IRV 

2S 

IS 

6S 

IS 

IS 

IS 

IS 

7S 

IS 

lOlS 

3S 

33S 

58S 

IS 

35 

17S 

78S 

IS 

IJ 
IS 
IS 
IS 
IS 

IJ 

IS 

5S 

IS 

IS 

2S 

IS 

2S 

37S 

13S 

IS 

95 

IS 

IS 

6US 

IS 

LOOS 


IS 


:i  \ 


S.  K.  Donovan  and  D.  T.  J.  Littlewood,  1993 


Table  2.    ( liiiiliinic 


Page  39 


fTraihyairdiinu  sp 

Americardia  gupptji  (Tliiilc.  1910) 

Aniericarilia  ntcdici  (Linnaeus,  1758) 

Lacvictirditini  liHiif^iiluin  (Linnaeus,  1758) 

'^Lacvicardiiun  Itui  if^dluiu  (Liiuiaeus,  1758) 

Laevicardium  '•'syhdnluuiu  Dall,  1886 

Chiotie  ranci'llata  (Liiuiaeus.  17(i7) 

Chionc  firaniilata  ((iinelin.  1791) 

Chionc  pap}uu  (Linnaeus,  I7()7) 

Transcnnclla  '•'cimradimi  Dall,  1883 

Transennclla  ?cubaniana  (d'OrliiKny,  18-42) 

Pitar  allrida  (Cmelin,  1791) 

Tcllina  altcrnala  Say,  1822 

Tcllina  listrri  Hoding,  1798 

Tcllina  similts  Sowerby,  1806 

Tcllina  sp.  iiulet 

Apohjmelis  inlastriata  (Say,  1826) 

Tagcliis  divisus  (Spengler,  1794) 

Mactra  fragilis  Gnwhn,  1791 

Scaphopods 
Cadulus  sp 

Denialium  ''anlillarum  dOrliigiu,  1846 
Dentalium  sp,  (smooth-shelled) 


1\ 


Totals 


2LV 

2RV 

ILV 

2RV 

(>LV 

7RV 

5S 

3LV 

IRV' 

1V  + 

lOLV 

URV 
IRV 

IS 

2LV 

2RV 

2S 

6LV 

2RV 

2LV 

2RV 

13LV 

12RV 

6S 

2LV 

2RV 

2V-I- 

3LV 

2RV 

2S 

18LV 

lORV 

4V-I- 

7LV 

3RV 

ILV 

6S 

30LV 

29RV 
2RV 

2S 

328V 

25S 

Total 


IS 
2S 
IS 

4S 


dant  Bulla  striata  Briiguiere,  1792  and  Cerithium  spp 
with  other  gastropods  and  rarer  bi\aives. 

Paleoecology  and  preservation:  Taxonomic  differ- 
ences are  interpreted  as  being  related  to  paieoenviron- 
mental  control.  Locality  1  included  abundant  hard  sub- 
strates for  the  attachment  of  epifaunal  bivalves,  provided 
by  the  coral  framework,  as  well  as  a  sandy  substrate 
suitable  for  a  variety  of  infaunal  and  epifaunal  ta.xa. 
Chitons,  which  generally  prefer  a  hard  substrate,  are  also 
common  at  this  locality .  In  contrast,  locality  2  lacks  any 
evidence  of  a  three-dimensional  framework  structure; 
indeed,  corals  were  small  and  isolated  in  this  paleoen- 
vironment.  Consequently ,  epifaunal  species  are  rare  and 
the  fauna  is  dominated  by  infaunal  taxa,  particularly  B 
striata,  but  also  including  \arious  burrowing  bi\alves 
(habitat  preferences  of  many  of  the  groups  tabulated 
herein  are  summarized  in  Cerridwen  &  Jones,  1991:  table 

Table  3.  .\  comparison  of  the  taxonomic  diversity  of  the  extant 
Jamaican  moliuscan  fauna  with  nominal  species  identified  here- 
in from  the  Falmouth  Formation.  Key:  -I-  =  after  Humfre\ 
(1975);  *  =  excluding  rare  species;  1,  2  =  localities. 


K\tant-I- 

1 

,-> 

1   +  2 

Scaphopods 

11 

•1 

3 

4 

:56 

Gastropods 

324* 

55 

37 

80 

25 

558 

55 

37 

80 

14 

Bivalves 

163* 

33 

34 

56 

34 

246 

33 

34 

56 

23 

Totals 

514* 

141) 

-">- 

831 

140 

17 

3).  The  only  species  which  forms  greater  than  2%  of  both 
faunas  is  Cerithium  algicola  C  B  .Adams,  1848  (figures 
8,  9;  tables  1,  2). 

The  difference  in  diversity  between  the  localities  may 
be  real,  although  it  is  almost  certainly  at  least  part  ar- 
tifact. This  is  because  of  the  differing  degrees  of  lithifi- 
cation  (and,  hence,  availability  of  specimens)  seen  he- 
tween  the  two  collecting  sites.  All  specimens  from  bulk 
samples  from  locality  1  were  theoretically  collected  by 
sieving  and  picking.  In  contrast,  limestones  from  locality 
2  were  not  amenable  to  such  processing,  being  well- 
lithified,  and  liberation  of  specimens  was  essentially  a 
destructive  process.  In  addition  to  those  specimens  bro- 
ken from  the  rock,  there  were  some  mollusks,  particularly 
those  with  a  fragile  shell,  that  were  too  easily  lost  due 
to  breakage  while  others  were  being  remo\ed.  Further, 
many  specimens  were  probably  ne\er  seen  because  they 
were  enclosed  within  the  remaining  small  chips  of  rock 
that  were  not  broken  down  further.  Micromollusks  are 
a  common  component  of  the  fauna  from  locality  1.  main- 
Iv  recognized  during  microscopic  examination  of  the 
sand-sized  sieve  fraction.  Such  a  technique  is  not  gen- 
erally possible  with  the  sediment  from  locality  2  and, 
even  if  detected,  small  shells  are  difficult  to  extract  and 
clean  from  the  hard  matrix.  The  total  absence  of  chiton 
vaKes  or  Caecum  shells  from  locality  2  may  be  real,  but 
the  limited  diversity  of  micromollusks  from  this  site  sug- 
gests that  preservational  and  collecting  biases  were  im- 
portant factors  (in  particular,  extant  Caecum  is  a  com- 
mon component  of  seagrass  communities  which 
presumably  occurred  in  the  paleolagoon).  Thus,  micro- 
mollusks were  part  of  the  easily  collectable  fauna  only 


Page  40 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


o 


o 

a- 
o 


lOOi 
75 
50 

25 
0 


a 


c3 


H. 


O 


^Myf0(iiyf^'^f!f^^mKy7TmmmmmjTwTw„ym^j 


Species 


Figure  8.  Histogram  of  relative  abundance  of  mollusk  species 
of  locality  1  (n  =  1467;  bivalves  recalculated  as  whole  shell 
equivalents).  89  species  are  each  present  as  less  than  1%  of  the 
total  mollusk  fauna.  •  =  broken  fragments  of  arks  which  are 
too  poorly  preserved  for  even  generic  identiBcation,  but  which 
are  probably  dominantly  A.  inihricala. 

at  locality  1,  although  it  was  still  possible  to  extract  some 
small  shells  from  the  limestones  at  locality  2  (particularly 
robust  shells  such  as  Cadtiliis  sp.  and  B.  striata  juveniles). 
Macromollusks  from  both  sections  are  often  exquisitely 
preserved.  Whilst  bivalves  are  normally  (and  chitons  in- 
variably) disarticulated,  valves  often  have  a  highly  glossy 
appearance,  such  as  Laevicardium  laevigattim  (Linnaeus, 
1758)  at  locality  2  and  Polinices  lacteus  (Guilding,  1834) 
at  both  localities,  equivalent  to  that  of  fresh  shells.  Fur- 
ther, shell  coloration  and/or  color  banding  is  preserved 
in,  for  example,  at  least  some  specimens  of  Leucozonia 
nassa  (Gmelin,  1791)  from  locality  1  and  B.  striata  from 
locality  2.  This  indicates  that  the  diagenetic  effects  lead- 
ing to  the  lithification  of  the  limestones  (particularly  at 
locality  2)  have  so  far  had  little  influence  on  the  organic 
molecules  that  are  largely  responsible  for  coloration. 
However,  many  shells  are  poorly  preserved,  often  being 
corroded  and/or  abraded.  Many  show  the  influence  of 
pre-  and  post-mortem  boring.  Pre-mortem  borings  by 
predatory  gastropods  (?P.  lacteus)  have  been  noted  in, 
for  example,  Brachidontcs  cxustus  (Linnaeus,  1758)  and 

Table  4.  ('omparison  ol  llic  extant  shallow-vsater  molluscan 
fauna  of  Yucatan  (PJkdale,  1974)  with  that  of  the  Pleistocene 


Falmouth  Knrmation 
calitit's 


e\rln<liiig  chitims. 


=  lo- 


Rocky  intertidal  zone  (14  sp.*) 
Lagoonal  and  mangrove-associated 

environments  (27  sp.) 
Broad,  shallow  backreef  (23  sp.) 
High-energy  environment  (8  sp.) 
Open  sea  assemblage  (15  sp.) 
(x)smo|)olitan  taxa  (9  sp.) 


Species 

in  common 

vith 

1  +  2 

1        2 

1  +  2 

Cc) 

3         1 

3 

21 

9         9 

11 

41 

7       10 
1          1 

10 

1 

43 

13 

4         3 

4 

27 

2         4 

4 

44 

100 


o 


75 


e    50 


o 

o 


25: 


0 


3 
I 


E. 


c       ^       1=       _3 


■a 

^ 

^ 

V 

-b 

cc 

o 

<3 

t-. 

r^ 

VZ^^r77T77xy77777\^ 


Species 


Figure  9.  Histogram  of  relati\  e  aliuntlancies  of  mollusk  species 
at  locality  2  (n  =  1226;  bivalves  recalculated  as  whole  shell 
equivalents)  71  species  are  each  present  as  less  than  2''(  of  the 
total  mollusk  launa.  •  =  broken  fragments  of  dominantly,  or 
entirely,  C.  algicola  +  C.  literattim  which  are  too  poorly  pre- 
served for  identification  below  the  generic  level. 

D.  sp.  cf.  D.  (A.)  antillariim  (see  Donovan  &  Littlewood, 
1989)  from  locality  1.  Presumably  post-mortem  borings 
produced  by  Pclionid  sponges  are  common  in  arks  from 
the  same  site,  while  B.  striata  and  P.  lacteus  from  locality 
2  were  occasionally  bored  by  polychaetes. 

Comparisons  with  extant  faunas:  17''(  of  the  extant, 
shallow-water,  benthic  mollusks  known  from  the  island 
at  the  present  day  have  been  identified  from  localities  1 
and  2  (table  3).  If  the  rarer  taxa  listed  by  Humfrey  (1975) 
are  ignored,  this  figure  rises  to  27%  (table  3), 

Parsons  and  Brett  (1991)  have  highlighted  the  fluctu- 
ating taxonomic  compositions  of  manv  tropical,  shallow 
shelf  mollusk  faunas.  The  assemblages  described  from 
the  Falmouth  Formation  undoubtedly  include  mollusks 
from  a  number  of  ephemeral  communities,  having  been 
collected  from  about  2-4  m  of  section.  While  the  broad 
environmental  signals  of  the  two  facies  are  obviously 
different,  it  is  uncertain  how  the  interplay  of  changing 
community  structure  at  both  sites  lead  to  the  preservation 
of  the  fossil  faunas.  Comparisons  that  we  have  made 
between  our  Falmouth  Formation  mollusk  assemblages 
and  published  descriptions  of  Caribbean  shallow-water 
mollusk  communities  have  been  inconclusive,  showing 
no  obvious  close  parallels.  As  an  example,  table  4  com- 
pares the  Falmouth  Formation  molluscs  with  the  modern 
shallow-water  fauna  of  northeast  Yucatan  (Ekdale,  1974). 
There  is  no  assemblage  which  shows  even  a  50%  simi- 
larity to  localities  1-1-2  combined.  Faunal  lists  of  the 
modern  mollusc  faunas  from  particular  habitats  in  Ja- 
maica lia\e  not  been  published  (Dr.  J.D.  Woodley,  per- 
sonal conmnication). 

CONCLUSIONS 

140  nominal  species  have  been  identified  from  the  late 
Pleistocene  Falmouth  Formation  of  Jamaica.  If  rarities 


S.  K.  Donovan  and  D.  T.  ].  Littlewood,  1993 


Page  41 


in  the  extant  launa  are  ignored,  this  represents  over  25% 
of  the  common  living  species  from  the  island.  However, 
the  Falmouth  Formation  is  an  averaged  sample  from  a 
number  of  ephemeral  communities  and  comparisons  w  ith 
extant  Caribbean  faunas  from  similar  em  iromnents  are 
inconclusive.  This  preliminary  sur\ey  highlights  the  di- 
versity of  the  mollusk  fauna  across  reef  environments 
and  suggests  that  fossil  reefs  may  be  considered  as  im- 
portant sampling  points  during  the  reconstruction  of  an- 
cient regional  biotas. 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Miss  Carla  M.  Gordon  for  her  considerable 
help  in  collecting  samples  and  providing  picked,  moilusk- 
rich  residues  surplus  to  her  own  research  needs.  Dr.  Rich- 
ard Gustafson  kindly  helped  with  the  identification  of 
some  of  the  more  obscure  bivalves  from  locality  1.  We 
thank  Ms.  Dana  C.  Larson  for  permission  to  utilize  her 
thesis  research  in  Fig.  3  This  paper  is  Discovery  Ba\ 
Marine  Laboratory  contribution  number  530,  New  Jer- 
sey Agricultural  Experiment  Station  publication  number 
D-32501-1-92  and  Institute  of  Marine  and  Coastal  Sci- 
ences contribution  number  92-04. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Abbott,  R.T.  1954.  American  seashelis.  Van  Nostrand,  Prince- 
ton. 542  p. 

Abbott,  R.T.  1958.  The  marine  moliusks  of  (irand  C'ayman 
IsiaiKJ,  British  West  Indies.  Monograpii  ot  the  Academy 
ol  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  11;  ISH  p. 

Abbott,  R.T.  1974.  American  seashelis  (2nd  ed.).  Van  Nos- 
trand Reinhold,  New  York.  663  p. 

Bengston,  P.  1988.  Open  nomenclature.  Palaeuntulogv  31: 
223-227. 

Cerridwen,  S.A.  and  B.  Jones.  1991.  Distribution  of  bivalves 
and  gastropods  in  the  Pleistocene  Ironshore  Formation, 
Grand  Cayman,  British  West  Indies.  Caribbean  Journal  of 
Science  27:  97-116. 

de  Jong,  K.M  and  H.E.  Coomans.  1988.  Marine  gastroputis 
from  Curasao,  Aruba  and  Bonaire  Studies  on  the  Fauna 
of  Curaq-ao  and  other  Caribbean  Islands  69:  261  p 

Donovan,  S.K.  1990.  Fossil  Scaphopoda  (Mollusca)  from  the 
Cenozoic  of  Jamaica.  Journal  of  the  Geological  Society  of 
Jamaica  27:  1-9. 

Donovan,  S.K.  and  CM.  Gordon.  1989.  Report  of  a  field 
meeting  to  selected  localities  in  St.  Andrew  and  St.  Ann, 
25  February  1989.  Journal  of  the  Geological  Society  of 
Jamaica  26:  51-54. 

Donovan,  S.K.,  CM.  Gordon,  C.J.  Veltkamp  antl  AD  Scott 
In  press.  Crinoids,  asteroids  and  ophiuroids  in  the  Ja- 
maican fossil  record.  Geological  Society  of  .Vmerica  Mem- 
oir 182. 

Donovan,  S.K.  and  D.T.J.  Littlewood.  1989.  A  Late  Pleisto- 
cene scaphopod  from  Jamaica.  Journal  of  Conchology  33: 
185. 

Fisher,  W.S.  (ed.).  1988.  Disease  processes  in  marine  hi\alve 
molluscs.  American  Fisheries  Society  Special  Publication 
18:  viii  -I-  315  p. 

Ekdale,  A.  A.    1974.    Marine  molluscs  from  shallow-water  en- 


vironments (0  t(i  60  meters)  off  the  northeast  Yucatan  coast, 
Mexico.  Bulletin  of  Marine  Science  24:  638-668. 

Gordon.  CM  and  S  K  Donovan.  1992.  Disarticulated  echi- 
iioid  ossicles  in  paleoecology  and  taphonomy:  the  last  in- 
terglacial  Falmouth  Formation  of  Jamaica.  Palaios7:  157- 
166. 

Hill,  R.T.  1899.  The  geology  and  plusical  geograph\  of  Ja- 
maica: a  study  of  a  type  of  .Antillean  tievelopment  Bulletin 
of  the  Museum  ot  Coniparati\e  Zoolog\  at  Harvard  34: 
256  p. 

Humfrev.  M  1975  Sea  shells  of  the  West  Indies.  Collins, 
London.  .351  p. 

Johnson,  R.G  I960.  Enviromnental  interpretation  of  Pleis- 
tocene marine  species.  Journal  of  Geology  68:  575-576. 

Jung,  P.  1972.  Moliusks  from  the  White  Limestone  Group  of 
Jamaica.  In:  Petzall,  C  (ed.)  Memorias  de  la  VI  Confer- 
encia  Geologica  del  Caribe,  Margarita,  Venezuela,  6-14 
del  Julio  de  1971,  Impreso  por  Cromotip,  Caracas,  p.  465- 
468. 

Land,  L.S.  1991.  Some  aspects  of  the  late  Cenozoic  evolution 
of  north  Jamaica  as  re\ealed  b\  strontium  isotope  stratig- 
raph>  Journal  of  the  Geological  Society  of  Jamaica  28: 
45-48. 

Land,  L.S.  and  S.  Epstein.  1970.  Late  Pleistocene  diagenesis 
and  dolomitization,  north  Jamaica.  Sedimentologv  14:  187- 
200. 

Larson,  DC  1983.  Depositional  facies  and  diagenetic  fabrics 
in  the  Late  Pleistocene  Falmouth  Formation  of  Jamaica. 
M.S.  thesis.  University  of  Oklahoma,  Norman,  Oklahoma. 

Liddell,  W.D.,S.L.  Ohihorstand  AG.  Coates.  1984.  Modern 
and  ancient  carbonate  environments  of  Jamaica.  Rosenstiel 
School  of  Marine  and  Atmospheric  Science,  University  of 
Miami,  Sedimenta  10:  vii  -I-  98  p. 

Morris,  PA.  (W.J.  Clench,  ed.).  1987.  A  field  guide  to  shells 
of  the  Atlantic  and  Ckilf  Coasts  and  the  West  Indies. 
Houghton  Mifflin,  Boston,  x.wiii  +  330  p. 

Morris,  S.F.  In  press.  Biostratigraphy  of  the  arthropods  of 
Jamaica.  Geological  Society  of  America  Memoir  180. 

Parsons,  KM.  and  C.E.  Brett.  1991.  Taphonomic  processes 
and  biases  in  modern  marine  environments:  an  actualis- 
tic  perspective  on  fossil  assemblage  preservation.  In  Don- 
ovan, S  K.  (ed  ).  Fossilization:  the  processes  of  taphonomy 
Belhaven  Press,  London   p.  22-65. 

Petuch,  E.J.  1988.  Neogene  histor\  of  tropical  .American  mol- 
iusks. The  Coastal  Education  and  Research  F"oundation, 
C^harlottesville,  Virginia.  217  p 

Robinson,  E.  1958.  The  younger  rocks  of  St.  James  and  Tre- 
lawny.  Geonotes  1:  15-17. 

Robinson,  E.  1960.  Observations  on  the  elevated  and  modern 
reef  formations  of  the  St.  Aim  coast.  Geonotes  3:  18-22. 

Robinson,  E  1963.  Quaternary  deposits.  In.  Zans,  V  A.,  L.J. 
Chubb,  H  R.  Versey,  J  B  Williams,  E  Robinson  and  D  L. 
Cooke.  Synopsis  of  the  geologv  of  Jamaica.  Bulletin  of  the 
Geological  Survey  Department  of  Jamaica  4:  50-54. 

Taylor,  J.D.  1978.  Faunal  response  to  the  instability  of  reef 
habitats:  Pleistocene  molluscan  assemblages  of  Aldabra 
Atoll.  Palaeontology  21:  1-30. 

Trechmann,  C  T.  1930.  The  Manchioneal  Beds  of  Jamaica 
Geological  Magazine  61:  199-218. 

N'alentine,  J.W  1989  How  good  was  the  fossil  record?  Clues 
from  the  Californian  Pleistocene.  Paleobiology  15:  83-94. 

\aught,  KG.  (R.T.  Abbott  and  K  J  Boss,  eds)  1989.  A  clas- 
sification of  the  li\ing  Mollusca.  American  Malacologists 
Inc.,  Melbourne,  Florida,  xii  +  195  p. 


Page  42  THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  1 


VVarmke,  G.L.  and  R.T   .Abbott.    1961.    Caribbean  seashells.  Woodring,  W.P     1928     Miocene  mollusks  from  Bowden,  ja- 

Livingston,  Narberth,  Pennsylvania,  x  +  346  p.  maica,  pt.  II,  gastropods  and  discussion  of  results.  Carnegie 

Woodring,  W.P.    1925.    Miocene  mollusks  from  Bowden,  Ja-  Institution  of  Washington  Publication  385:  564  p. 

maica.  Carnegie  Institution  of  Washington  Publication  366: 
vii  +  222p. 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


THE  NAUTILUS  publishes  papers  on  all  aspects  of  the 
biology  and  systematics  of  mollusks.  Manuscripts  de- 
scribing original,  unpublished  research  as  well  as  review 
articles  will  be  considered.  Brief  articles,  not  exceeding 
1000  words,  will  be  published  as  notes  and  do  not  re- 
quire an  abstract.  Notices  of  meetings  and  other  items 
of  interest  to  rnalacologists  will  appear  in  a  news  and 
notices  section. 

Manuscripts:  Each  original  manu.script  and  accompa- 
nying illustrations  should  be  submitted  in  triplicate.  Text 
must  be  typed  on  one  side  of  8'/2  x  11  inch  white  paper, 
double  spaced  throughout  (including  literature  cited,  ta- 
bles and  figure  captions),  with  at  least  1  inch  of  margin 
on  all  sides.  All  pages  must  be  numbered  consecutively. 
If  printed  on  a  word  processor,  the  right  margin  should 
be  ragged  rather  than  justified.  Authors  should  follow 
the  recommendations  of  the  Council  oj  Biology  Editors 
Style  Manual,  which  is  available  from  the  (Council  of 
Biology  Editors,  Inc.,  9650  Rockville  Pike,  Bethesda,  MD 
20814,  U.S.A.  The  first  mention  of  a  scientific  name  in 
the  text  should  be  accompanied  by  the  taxonomic  au- 
thority, including  year.  Latin  names  and  words  to  be 
printed  in  italics  must  be  underlined;  leave  other  indi- 
cations to  the  editor.  Metric  and  Celsius  units  are  to  be 
used. 

The  sequence  of  sections  should  be:  title  page,  abstract 
page,  introduction,  materials  and  methods,  results,  dis- 
cussion, acknowledgements,  literature  cited,  tables,  fig- 
ure captions,  figures.  The  title  page  should  include  the 
title,  author's  name(s)  and  address(es).  The  abstract  page 
should  contain  the  title  and  abstract,  which  should  sum- 
marize in  250  words  or  less  the  scope,  main  results  and 
conclusions  of  the  paper.  The  abstract  may  be  followed 
by  a  maximum  of  8  key  words.  All  references  cited  in 
the  text  must  appear  in  the  literature  cited  section  and 
vice  versa.  In  the  literature  cited  section,  all  authors 
must  be  fully  identified  and  listed  alphabetically.  Follow 
a  recent  issue  of  THE  NAUTILUS  for  bibliographic  style, 
noting  that  journal  titles  must  be  unabbreviated.  Infor- 
mation on  plates  and  figures  should  be  cited  only  if  not 
included  in  the  pagination.  Tables  must  be  numbered 
and  each  placed  on  a  separate  sheet.  A  brief  legend  must 
accompany  each  table.  Captions  for  each  group  of  illus- 
trations should  be  typed  on  a  separate  sheet  and  include 
a  key  to  all  lettered  labeling  appearing  in  that  group  of 
illustrations. 


All  line  drawings  must  be  in  black,  high  quality  ink, 
clearly  detailed  and  completely  labeled.  Photographs 
must  be  on  glo.ssy,  high  contrast  paper.  All  figures  are 
to  be  consecutively  numbered  (figs.  1,  2,  3,  ...  ,  NOT 
figs.  la.  lb,  Ic,  .  .  .  NOR  plate  1,  fig.  1  .  .  .).  Illustrations 
must  be  arranged  in  proportions  that  will  conform  with 
the  width  of  a  page  (6%  inches  or  171  mm)  or  a  column 
(3'/4  inches  or  82  mm).  The  maximum  size  of  a  printed 
figure  is  6%  by  9  inches  or  171  by  228  mm.  All  illus- 
trations must  be  fully  cropped,  mounted  on  a  firm,  white 
backing,  numbered,  labeled  and  camera  ready.  The  au- 
thor's name,  paper  title  and  figure  number(s)  should  ap- 
pear on  the  back.  Original  illustrations  must  be  between 
one  and  two  times  the  desired  final  size.  It  is  the  author's 
responsibility  that  the  line  weight  and  lettering  are  ap- 
propriate for  the  desired  reduction.  Original  illustrations 
will  be  returned  to  the  author  if  requested.  Color  illus- 
trations can  be  included  at  extra  cost  to  the  author. 

Voucher  Material:  Deposition  of  type  material  in  a 
recognized  public  museum  is  a  requirement  for  publi- 
cation of  papers  in  which  new  species  are  described. 
Deposition  of  representative  voucher  specimens  in  such 
institutions  is  strongly  encouraged  for  all  other  types  of 
research  papers. 

Processing  of  Manuscripts:  Upon  receipt,  every  manu- 
script is  acknowledged  and  sent  for  critical  review  by  at 
least  two  referees.  These  reviews  serve  as  the  basis  for 
acceptance  or  rejection.  Accepted  manuscripts  are  re- 
turned to  the  author  for  consideration  of  the  reviewers' 
comments.  A  finalized  version  of  the  manuscript  is  re- 
turned to  the  editor  and  sent  to  press.  Two  sets  of  proofs 
are  sent  to  the  author  for  correction.  Changes  other  than 
typesetting  errors  will  be  charged  to  the  author  at  cost. 
One  set  of  corrected  proofs  should  be  sent  to  the  editor 
as  soon  as  possible.  Authors  with  institutional,  grant  or 
other  research  support  w  ill  be  billed  for  page  charges  at 
the  rate  of  $60.00  per  printed  page. 

An  order  form  for  reprints  will  accompany  the  proofs. 
Reprints  may  l)e  ordered  through  the  editor. 

Manuscripts,  corrected  proofs  and  correspondence  re- 
garding editorial  matters  should  be  .sent  to:  Dr.  M.G. 
Harasewych,  Editor,  Division  of  Mollusks,  NHB  stop  1 18, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution, 'V\'ashington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


THIS  PUBLICATION  IS  PRINTED  ON  ACID-FREE  PAPER. 


FHE  NAUTILUS 


^^.^^p^T 


Volume  107,  Number  2 
July  28,  1993 
ISSN  0028-1344 

A  quarterly  devoted 
to  malacology. 


LIBRARY 


AUG    61983 


Vvoodr}  Hole,  !V;.    3. 


EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Dr.  M.  G.  Harasewych 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


ASSOCIATE  EDITOR 
Dr.  R.  Tucker  Abbott 
American  Malacologists,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  2255 
Melbourne,  FL  32902 


CONSULTING  EDITORS 
Dr.  Riidiger  Bieler 
Department  of  Invertebrates 
Field  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Chicago,  IL  60605 


Dr.  Robert  T.  Dillon,  Jr. 
Department  of  Biology 
College  of  Charleston 
Charleston,  SC  29424 


Dr.  William  K.  Emerson 

Department  of  Living  Invertebrates 

The  American  Museum  of  Natural 

History 

New  York,  NY  10024 


Dr.  Robert  Hershler 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Dr.  Richard  S.  Houbrick 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smith.sonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Mr.  Richard  I.  Johnson 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Aurele  La  Rocque 
Department  of  Geology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  James  H.  McLean 
Department  of  Malacology 
Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
900  E.xposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007 

Dr.  Arthur  S.  Merrill 
%  Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Ms.  Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 
Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 
Institution,  Inc. 
Ft.  Pierce,  FL  33450 

Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore 

Division  of  Marine  Geology 

and  Geophysics 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and 

Atmospheric  Science 

University  of  Miami 

4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 

Miami,  FL  33149 

Dr.  Gustav  Paulay 
Marine  Laboratory 
University  of  Guam 
Mangilao,  Guam  96923 

Mr.  Richard  E.  Petit 

P.O.  Bo.x  30 

North  Myrtle  Beach,  SC  29582 

Dr.  Edward  J.  Petuch 
Department  of  Geology 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431 


Dr.  David  H.  Stansbery 
Museum  of  Zoology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  Ruth  D.  Turner 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Mu.seum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Geerat  J.  Vermeij 
Department  of  Geology 
University  of  California  at  Davis 
Davis,  CA  95616 


SUBSCRIPTION  INFORMATION 

The  subscription  rate  per  volume 
is  US  $25.00  for  individuals,  US 
$40.00  for  institutions.  Postage 
outside  the  United  States  is  an 
additional  US  $5.00  for  surface 
and  US  $12.00  for  air  mail.  All 
orders  should  be  accompanied  by 
pavment  and  sent  to;  THE 
NAUTILUS,  P.O.  Box  7279,  Silver 
Spring,  MD  20907-7279,  USA. 

Change  of  address:    Please  inform 
the  publisher  of  your  new  address 
at  least  6  weeks  in  advance.  All 
communications  should  include 
both  old  and  new  addresses  (with 
zip  codes)  and  state  the  effective 
date. 

THE  NAUTILUS  (ISSN  0028- 
1344)  is  published  quarterly  by 
Trophon  Corporation,  8911  Alton 
Parkway,  Silver  Spring,  MD  20910. 

Second  Class  postage  paid  at  Silver 
Spring,  MD  and  additional  mailing 
offices. 

POSTMASTER;  Send  address 
changes  to:  THE  NAUTILUS 
P.O.  Box  7279 
Silver  Spring,  MD  20907-7279 


THE  €9  NAUTILUS 


CONTENTS 


Volume  107,  Number  2 


Marine  Biological  LaboraLw/"'^  ^*'  ^^^^ 
LIBRARY         ^%  0028-1344 


Silvard  P.  Kool 


The  Systematic  Position  of  the  Genius  W&d&H    HolS     MasS 
(Prosobranchia:  Miiricidae;  r>r.or.o'kr;n>)p'|       ^ 


43 


Jose  H.  Leal 
Donald  R.  Moore 


Thala  csperanza.  a  new  Costellariidae  (Mollusca: 
Gastropoda)  from  northern  Puerto  Rico   


58 


Anionieto  S.  Tan 
Ya-ping  Hu 
IVIichael  Castagna 
Richard  A.  Luiz 
Michael  J.  kennish 
Alan  S.  Pooley 


Shell  and  Pallet  Mor|jhology  of  Early  Developmental 
Stages  of  Bankia  gouldi  (Bartsch,  1908)  (Bivalvia: 
Teredinidae)  ... 


63 


S.  J.  kleinschusler 
S.  L.  Swink 


A  Simple  Method  tor  the  In  Vitro  Oilture  of  Perkinsus 
warinus 


76 


Harold  G.  Pierce 


On  the  Identification  of  Fossil  Terrestrial  Gastropod 
Eggshells 


79 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(2):43-57,  1993 


Page  43 


The  Systematic  Position  of  the  Genus  NiiceUa 
(Prosobranchia:  Muricidae:  Ocenebrinae) 


Silvard  P.  Kool 

Mollusk  Department 

Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 

Harvard  Universitv 

Camhriiige.  Massachusetts  02138  USA 


ABSTRACT 

The  muricid  genus  S'ucclla  Roding.  1798  has  conimonK  been 
placed  in  Thaidinae  Joiisseaunie,  1888  (Prosobranchia:  Muri- 
cidae). The  Thaidinae  (scnsii  Kool,  1989)  is  monoph)  letic  with 
and  thus  s\  nonymous  with  Rapaninae  Gra\ ,  1853  (Kool,  1993, 
in  press).  Comparative  anatomical  investigations  of  the  type 
species  of  Nucclla  Roding,  1798  (Buccinum  filosum  Gmelin, 
1791  [=Nttcella  lapillus  (Linnaeus,  1758)])  and  of  Thais  Rod- 
ing, 1798  (Murex  funis  Gmelin,  1791  [  =  Thais  nodosa  (Lin- 
naeus, 1758)])  as  well  as  other  rapanines  have  revealed  that 
inclusion  of  Nucclla  in  Rapaninae  would  result  in  polyphyletic 
groups  (Kool,  1989;  1993,  in  press).  Studies  of  the  anatomy, 
radula,  protoconch,  shell  ultrastructure,  and  operculum  of  the 
type  species  of  A't/ce/Za,  Occnebra  Gray,  1847  (Murcx  crinaceus 
Linnaeus,  1758  [=Ocenebra  erinacea])  (Ocenebrinae  Coss- 
mann,  1903),  and  Trophon  Montfort,  1810  {Murex  magellan- 
tcMS  Gmelin,  1791  [=Trophon  geversianus  (PaWni,  1774)])  (Tro- 
phoninae  Cossmann,  1903),  indicate  that  Nucella  has  close 
affinities  with  Ocenebrinae  and  Trophoninae  Based  on  cladistic 
analyses,  it  is  here  proposed  that  Nucclla  be  placed  in  Oce- 
nebrinae. Results  further  reveal  that  the  distinctions  between 
Ocenebrinae  and  Trophoninae  are  less  clear  than  previously 
accepted 

Key  words:  Nucclla,  Ocenebrinae,  phylogeny;  systematics; 
comparative  anatom\ 


INTRODUCTION 

The  Thaidinae  of  authors,  also  referred  to  as  Thaididae, 
Purpurinae/dae  Swainsoii,  1840,  Driipinae  Wenz,  1941, 
etc.,  has  been  shown  to  be  a  conglomerate  of  disparate 
taxa  (Kool,  1989;  1993,  in  press).  The  ta.xonomic  coher- 
ence of  the  Thaidinae  and  the  boundaries  of  its  genera 
were  based  primarily  on  external  shell  characters,  which 
are  often  convergent,  obscuring  phylogenetic  relation- 
ships. 

Rigorous  cladistic  analyses  based  primarily  on  char- 
acters derived  from  anatomy,  radula,  operculum,  and 
shell  ultrastructure,  have  shown  that  para-  and  poly- 
phyly  were  wide-spread  in  the  Thaidinae/dae  of  authors 
(Kool,  1989).  Subsequent  phylogenetic  studies  have  re- 
vealed that  the  genus  Rapana  Schumacher,  1817,  and 


the  Thaidinae  (in  partem)  constitute  a  monophyletic 
group,  making  Thaidinae  a  junior  subjective  synonym 
of  Rapaninae  (Kool,  1993,  in  press).  The  name  Rapaninae 
will  herein  be  used  for  the  clade  that  includes  Rapana 
and  Thais 

Several  species  of  the  genus  Nitcella  have  been  used 
extensively  in  ecological  studies  (Colton,  1922;  Crothers, 
1983,  1985;  Emlen,  19(56;  Etter,  1987;  Kincaid,  1957; 
Moore,  1936,  1938;  Palmer,  1983,  1985;  Spight,  1972, 
1976).  In  most  of  these  studies  Mucella  was  regarded  as 
a  subgenus  or  synonym  of  Thais.  Anatomical  studies 
(Kool,  1986,  1989)  of  the  type  species  of  Nucella  [Buc- 
cinum filosum  =  Nucella  lapillus  (see  Kool  &  Boss,  1992)] 
and  Thais  [Murex  fucus  =  Thais  noc/o.sa]  revealed  major 
differences  between  these  genera.  Kool  (1988)  therefore 
excluded  Nucella  from  the  Thaidinae  and  tentatively 
placed  Nucella  in  the  Ocenebrinae  (Kool,  1989)  on  the 
basis  of  radular  (Sabelli  &  Tommasini,  1987;  Bandel, 
1977)  and  protoconch  (Bandel,  1975)  morphology  as  well 
as  anatomical  descriptions  (Graham,  1941)  of  Ocenebra 
erinacea. 

Although  the  anatomv  of  Nucella  lapillus  is  well  known 
(Fretter  &  Graham,  1962;  Kool,  1986,  1989;  Oehlmann 
et  al.,  1988),  relatively  little  is  known  about  the  soft  parts 
of  Ocenebra  erinacea.  Aspects  of  the  anatomy  of  Tro- 
phon geversianus  were  described  by  Harasewych  (1984), 
who  suggested  that  similarities  (e.g.  radular  morphology) 
between  members  of  Trophon  and  Nucella  may  be  due 
either  to  convergence  resulting  from  similar  environ- 
mental conditions  or  to  phylogenetic  affinity. 

The  object  of  this  study  is  to  discern  the  phylogenetic 
affinities  among  Nucella,  Trophon  and  Ocenebra. 


MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

The  following  specimens  were  used  for  anatomical  stud- 
ies: 

Nucella  lapillus-  Kittery,  Maine,  U.S.A.  (USNM  857053) 
(7  9,  5S). 

Trophon  geversiatius;  Daniel  Este,  Isia  Grande,  Tierra 
del  Fuego,  Chile  (LACM  86-270.2);  Puerto  Basil  Hall, 


Page  44 

THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 

Table  1.    List  of  characters  and  character  states 

for  Murican 

•thus. 

Thaifi.  Troplifm.  Nuce 

'lla,  and  Ocenelna. 

Character 

Mur 

Tha 

Tro 

Nuc 

Oce 

1.   Protoconch  whorls 

0 

0 

1 

1 

2.  Calcitic  layer 

0 

1 

1 

1 

3.   Number  of  aragonitic  layers 

0 

1 

2 

2 

0 

-4    Position  of  opercular  nucleus 

0 

3 

1 

2 

5.  Opercular  shape 

0 

1 

0 

1 

6.   Pigmentation  pattern  on  head-foot  re- 

gion 

0 

0 

1 

1 

7.  Duct(s)  for  accessory  boring  organ  and 

ventral  pedal  gland 

0 

0 

0 

1 

8.   Bursa  copulatrix 

0 

2 

1 

1 

0 

9.  Seminal  receptacles  at  dorsal  periphery 

of  albumen  gland 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

10    Fenial  shape 

0 

2 

1 

0 

0 

11.   Penial  vas  deferens 

0 

1 

0 

0 

2 

12.   Prostate 

0 

1 

0 

0 

0 

13.   Accessory  salivary  gland(s) 

0 

1 

1 

2 

2 

14.  Straw-like  membrane  around  glancl  of 

Leiblein 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

1.5,   Posterior  duct  of  gland  of  Leiblein 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

16.   Ontral  cusp  of  rachidian 

0 

0 

0 

1 

1 

17    Margin  of  rachidian  basal  plate 

0 

0 

1 

1 

1 

Isla  de  los  Estados,  Tierra  del  Fuego,  Argentina  (LACM 
71-289);  Piinta  Catalina,  Isla  Grande,  Tierra  del  Fuego, 
Chile  (LACM  80-87.2)  (4  9,  3  <5). 

Ocenebra  erinacea;  Roscoff,  France  (MCZ  298425)  (2  2. 
IS). 

Morphological  data  were  compiled  from  soft  tissues, 
radulae,  shell  ultrastructures,  protoconchs,  and  opercula. 
Living  specimens  of  Nucella  and  preserved  specimens 
of  Nucella.  Trophon  and  Ocenebra  were  dissected. 

Radulae  (2-4  per  species)  were  cleaned  using  a  potas- 
sium hydro.xide  solution,  rinsed  in  distilled  water,  air- 
dried,  sputter-coated  with  carbon  and  gold,  and  exam- 
ined with  a  Hitachi  S-570  scanning  electron  microscope. 
Photomicrographs  were  taken  of  the  unused,  matured 
central  portion  of  each  radular  ribbon. 

Shell  fragments  from  at  least  two  individuals  of  each 
species  were  obtained  by  crushing  the  shell.  Portions 
from  the  central  region  of  the  body  whorl  about  one- 
half  to  three-quarters  of  a  whorl  away  from  the  edge  of 
the  apertural  lip  were  mounted,  sputter-coated  with  car- 
bon and  gold,  and  their  fracture  surfaces  observed  with 
a  Hitachi  S-570  scanning  electron  microscope.  An  ap- 
parentK  amorphous  outer  layer  was  interpreted  as  con- 
sisting of  calcite,  while  layers  with  organization  in  crystal 
lamellar  structure  were  considered  aragonitic  (data  from 
x-ray  diffraction  methods  confirm  these  identifications; 
Kool  and  Harasewych,  in  preparation). 

Cladistic  Analysis:  Seventeen  characters,  divided  into  41 
character  states  (Table  1 ),  were  used  in  a  cladistic  anaK  sis 
performed  with  [Iennig86  (Clopyright  J.S.  Farris,  1988). 
The  six  multislate  characters  were  entered  as  unordered. 
Most  characters  were  derived  from  soft  tissues  (mainly 
from  the  male  and  female  reproductive  and  alimentarv 


systems),  the  remainder  from  radulae,  opercula,  proto- 
conchs, and  shell  ultrastructiire.  Two  additional  species, 
Thais  nodosa  and  Muricanthus  ftdvescens  (Sowerby, 
1841),  are  used  in  the  cladistic  analysis,  based  on  data 
in  Kool  (1989;  1993,  in  press).  Muricanthus  fulvescens, 
a  muricine  and  member  of  a  sister  group  of  Ocenebrinae, 
Trophoninae  and  Rapaninae,  is  used  as  outgroup  for  the 
cladistic  analysis. 

Table  1  lists  characters  and  character  states,  and  re- 
flects the  sequence  in  which  organs  and  other  morpho- 
logical features  are  described  for  each  of  the  three  spe- 
cies. 

RESULTS 

DESCRIPTIONS  OF  TAXA 

Nucella  lapillus. 

Shell.  Protoconch  (Figs.  26,  29)  conical,  low,  of  about 
l'/4  smooth  whorls,  with  impressed  suture;  transition  to 
teleoconch  smooth,  difficult  to  discern.  Teleoconch  high- 
ly polymorphic;  usually  elongate,  oval,  of  6-7  whorls 
(Figs.  1-6,  21,  22).  Adult  shell  to  55  mm  in  height,  30 
mm  in  u  idth.  Body  whorl  rounded,  about  80?f  of  shell 
height,  smooth  or  sculptured  with  pattern  of  about  15 
spiral,  occasionally  lamellose.  ridges.  Aperture  (to  65% 
of  shell  height)  oval;  outer  lip  w  ide,  smooth,  occasionally 
with  3-4  denticles  on  edge  of  thickened  lip.  Columella 
v\ith  moderate  callus,  flat  to  concave.  Siphonal  canal 
short,  open  (Fig.  3)  to  partly  closed  (Fig.  1).  Siphonal 
fascicle  poorly  developed,  adjacent  to  callus  layer.  Shell 
color  variable:  white,  grey,  yellow,  brown,  orange-red; 
often  banded;  aperture,  colmiiella  white 

Shell  Ultraslrncturc.  Innermost  laverof  crossed-lamellar 


S.  p.  Kool,  1993 


Page  45 


aragoiiite,  with  crystal  planes  oriented  perpendicular  to 
growing  edge  [15-20%  of  tliiekness;  often  absent  (Fig. 
28)];  middle  layer  of  crossed-lamellar  aragonite.  witfi 
crystal  planes  oriented  parallel  to  grow  ing  edge  [15-25% 
of  thickness];  outermost  laser  of  calcite  [55-85%)  of  thick- 
ness] (Fig,  27). 

Operculum  D-shaped,  with  lateral  nucleus  just  below 
center  right  (Figs.  7,  8).  Outer  surface  (Fig.  7)  with  arch- 
shaped  growth  lines  recurved  at  both  ends;  inner  surface 
(Fig.  8)  with  3-5  arch-shaped  growth  lines,  with  broad 
(35-40%  of  opercular  width),  callused,  glazed  outer  rim 

HeocI  and  Foot.  L'niformly  light  yellow  to  white.  Ce- 
phalic tentacles  elongate,  thin.  Incurrent  siphon  short. 
Mantle  edge  smooth.  Accessory  boring  organ  (Fig.  56, 
abo)  large,  well  developed,  (in  females)  anterior  to,  sep- 
arate from  equally  large  ventral  pedal  gland  (Fig.  56, 
Pg)- 

Mantle  Cavity  Osphradium  slightK  more  than  'i  cten- 
idial  length,  less  than  l;  ctenidial  width.  Right  pectin 
usually  wider  than  left.  Each  lamella  (8-10/mm)  at- 
tached to  mantle  roof  along  V2  its  base.  Anteriormost 
portion  of  ctenidium  straight,  extending  slightly  anterior 
of  osphradium  Ctenidial  knnellae  (9-1 1/mm)  wider  than 
high  or  equalK  wide  as  high,  with  strongly  convex  or 
straight  lateral  edges,  translucent.  Thick  supporting  rod 
extending  beyond  lateral  edge  of  each  lamella,  forming 
small  papilla. 

Female  Reproductive  System:  Vaginal  opening  round 
with  slightK  swollen  edges,  located  below  and  posterior 
to  anus.  Bursa  copulatrix  (Fig.  47,  48,  be)  small  diver- 
ticulum, connected  to  vagina,  ventral  channel  (vc)  by 
wide  ventral  passage.  Ventral  channel  formed  by  two 
small  interlocking  flanges  located  under  ventral  lobe  of 
capsule  gland,  one  arising  from  left  lobe,  the  other  from 
ventral  epithelium.  Single-chambered  ingesting  gland  lo- 
cated between  capsule  gland  and  albumen  gland.  Al- 
bumen gland  (Fig.  49)  arch-shaped,  elongate,  opening 
anteriorly  into  ovi-sperm  duct  (osd),  posteriorly  into  ovi- 
duct (od).  Ovary  yellow  to  light  golden.  Many  specimens 
with  pseudo-penis  of  variable  size  (see  also  Brvan  et  al., 
1986). 

Male  Reproductive  System:  Penis  (Fig.  60)  simple,  elon- 
gate, dorso-ventralK  flattened,  often  slightK  curved,  w  ith 
abruptly  tapering,  papilla-like  end.  Penial  vas  deferens 
(Fig.  62,  pvd)  minute,  simple  duct,  semi-closed  by  trans- 
verse ridges  on  overlapping  ventral  and  dorsal  sides  of 
penis.  Cephalic  vas  deferens  (Fig.  57,  cvd)  well  devel- 
oped, extending  from  penis  (p)  to  prostate  gland  (pr). 
Prostate  gland  (Fig.  57,  pr)  white;  prostate  duct  (prd) 
dorso-ventral  slit  in  cross  section;  duct  open  to  mantle 
cavity  posteriorly.  Posterior  vas  deferens  (along  visceral 
mass)  well  developed,  white  to  dirty  white,  iridescent. 
Testis  light  brow  n  to  golden. 

Alimentary  System:  Paired  accessors  salivar\  glands  ex- 
tremely long,  usually  equal  to  or  slightly  longer  than  one- 
half  of  shell  height;  left  gland  intertwined  with  salivary 


glamls,  right  gland  separate  from  salivary  glands,  situ- 
ated in  right  anterior  corner  of  buccal  cavity.  Salivar% 
glands  in  center  of  dorsal  buccal  cavity  between  gland 
of  Leiblein  and  short,  pear-shaped  valve  of  Leiblein. 
Sali\ar>  ducts  attached  to  anterior  esophagus  at  some 
distance  from  valve.  (Glandular  folds  in  mid-esophageal 
region  inconspicuous.  Connection  between  mid-esoph- 
agus and  gland  of  Leiblein  short,  thick.  Posterior  esoph- 
agus appressed  to  left  side  of  gland  of  Leiblein  in  loop- 
shaped  fashion.  Gland  of  Leiblein  \ellowish;  posterior 
blind  duct  very  short  ( <  Vi  length  of  gland),  with  small 
terminal  ampulla.  Stomach  tubular,  with  8-12  large,  ra- 
dialK  oriented  folds  on  wall.  Stomach  typhlosole  ex- 
tending dorsally  onto  left  portion  of  posterior  mixing 
area.  Intestinal  t\  phlosole  thick,  w  ide.  Tw  o  digestive  di- 
verticula present.  Rectal  gland  inconspicuous.  Large  pa- 
pilla overlying  equally  large  anus. 

Radula:  Ribbon  length  30-35%  of  shell  height.  Base  of 
rachidian  tooth  expanded  below  fwse  of  neighboring  ra- 
chidian  tooth;  central  cusp  of  rachidian  thin,  flame- 
shaped,  leaning  more  anteriorly  (in  situ)  than  lateral 
cusps;  inner  lateral  denticle  low  on  base  of  lateral  cusp, 
occasionalK  bifurcate  (w  ithin  same  specimen);  outer  edge 
of  lateral  cusp  w  ith  se\  eral  denticles;  large  marginal  cusp 
pointing  straight  forward  and  parallel  to  elongate,  lateral 
extension  at  base  of  rachidian  tooth  (Figs.  23-25),  re- 
sulting in  bifid  appearance  of  rachidian  basal  plate.  Lat- 
eral teeth  shorter  than  rachidian  width  (Fig.  23). 

Egg  capsules:  Elongate-oval,  vase-shaped,  up  to  9  mm 
in  height,  3  mm  in  w  iilth.  Capsules  \ellow,  light  brow  n 
or  purple  (Lebour,  1937),  each  attached  by  short,  thin 
stalk  about  1  mm  long.  Apex  tapered  with  rounded,  cap- 
shaped  top  with  mucous  plug.  Capsules  interconnected 
at  base.  Number  of  embryos  varying  from  two  (Risbec, 
1937)  to  one  thousand  (Fretter  &  Graham,  1962,  1985), 
most  being  nurse  eggs  (75-95%)  (Crothers,  1985;  Fretter 
&  Graham,  1985;  Lamv,  1928)  (see  also  Pelseneer,  1911; 
Ankel,  1937;  Thorson,  1941,  1946;  Robertson,  1974). 

Ecology:  More  is  known  about  Nucclla  ecology  than 
about  any  other  muricoidean  [for  an  extensive  bibliog- 
raphy on  the  biology  (primarily  ecology)  of  Nticella  la- 
pillus,  see  Crothers,  1985].  Nucella  lapUlus  and  its  west- 
ern American  congeners  have  been  the  topic  of  man\ 
comprehensive  studies  (Crothers,  1985;  Emien,  1966;  Et- 
ter,  1987;  Kincaid,  1957;  Spight,  1972).  Nucella  feeds  on 
barnacles  and  mussels  (Colton,  1922;  Connell,  1970; 
Crothers,  1973;  Graham,  1955;  Kool,  1987;  Largen,  1967; 
Murdoch,  1969;  Spight,  1982)  in  the  rocky  intertidal  zone 
and  is  eaten  by  crabs  and  birds  (Spight,  1976).  Studies 
of  Agersborg  (1929),  Colton  (1922),  and  Moore  (1936) 
show  that  environmental  factors  (wave  action,  food  avail- 
abilits,  etc.)  influence  shell  morphology.  Moore  (1938) 
reported  the  main  spaw  ning  period  to  be  during  winter 
and  spring;  but  breeding  occurs  throughout  the  year 
(Lebour,  1937;  Thorson,  1946).  Juveniles  hatch  from  the 
eggs  after  4-7  months  (Fretter  &  Graham,  1985). 

Distribution:  North  Atlantic  Ocean  from  southern  Por- 


Page  46 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


7 


^^^ 


% 


^^^ 


/     ■ 


/. 


11 


8 


mi' 

17 


^^m 


'^' 


18 


19  *- 


Figures  1-8  .V«C(?//a  /api7/us.  1-6.  Shells  (1,2  MCZ  69192,  Freshwater  Bay.  Isle  of  Wright.  England,  height  25  mm;  3,4  MCZ 
1 1.509.3.  Sullivan,  Maine.  I  S  .V  .  height  .35  mm;  5.6  MC.Z  50600.  Wales,  height  3-1  mm)  7.8  Operculum  (MCZ  302404,  Braunton, 
North  Devon,  England,  height  15  mm);  7.  Outer  surface;  8.  Inner  surface.  Figures  »J-14   Trophon  gevcrsianus.  Shells  (9.10  MCZ 


S.  p.  Kool.  1993 


Page  47 


tugal  to  Xovaya  Zembl\a  [records  from  western  Medi- 
terranean, Azores,  Morocco,  Senegal,  and  Canary  Islands 
are  suspect  (Cooke.  1915)];  Great  Britain;  Ireland;  Ice- 
land; Greenland;  New  Jerse\,  L.S.A..  to  northern  Canada 
[for  extensi\e  list  of  geographical  range  and  localities, 
see  Cooke,  1915]. 

Trophon  geversianus: 

Harasewych  (1984)  described  aspects  of  the  anatom\  of 
Trophon  geversianus  (Figs.  9.  10,  13,  14.  30.  31 ).  Because 
my  observations  were  congruent  w  ith  the  descriptions  in 
Harasewych  s  paper,  only  the  most  essential  and  supple- 
mental data  are  presented  to  avoid  unnecessary  dupli- 
cation. 

Shell  ultrastructure:  Innermost  la\er  of  crossed-lamellar 
aragonite,  w  ith  cr>  stal  planes  oriented  perpendicular  to 
growing  edge  [10-15!^  of  thickness;  often  absent  (Fig. 
37)];  middle  layer  of  crossed-lamellar  aragonite,  with 
crystal  planes  oriented  parallel  to  growing  edge  [15-20% 
of  thickness];  outermost  layer  of  calcite  [70-80%  of  thick- 
ness] (Fig.  36). 

Operculum:  0\ate,  with  lateral  nucleus  in  lower  right 
(Figs.  11,  12).  Outer  surface  (Fig.  11)  with  growth  lines 
recurved  at  upper  ends,  progressiveh  upright;  inner  sur- 
face (Fig.  12)  with  3-4  narrow  horseshoe-shaped  growth 
lines,  broad  ( >  '3  opercular  width ).  lightK  callused,  glazed 
outer  rim. 

Head  and  foot:  UniformK  light  \ellow  Cephalic  ten- 
tacles elongate,  thin.  Incurrent  siphon  short.  Mantle  edge 
smooth,  .\ccessory  boring  organ  (Fig.  55,  abo)  well  de- 
veloped, sharing  common  duct  with  ventral  pedal  gland 
(pg)  in  females. 

Mantle  Cavity:  Osphradium  small  ('/3-%  ctenidial  length. 
-/i  ctenidial  width).  usualK  partialK  overK  ing  ctenidium. 
Right  pectin  usualK  wider  than  left.  Each  lamella  (9- 
10  mm)  attached  to  mantle  roof  along  most  of  its  length. 
.•\nteriormost  portion  of  ctenidium  straight,  extending 
slightly  anterior  of  osphradium.  Ctenidial  lamellae  (10- 
12  mm)  translucent,  wider  than  high  anteriorK.  equalK 
wide  as  high  posteriorly,  with  straight  to  convex  lateral 
edges. 

Female  Reproductive  System:  \'aginal  opening  (Fig.  47, 
vo)  round,  with  swollen  edges,  located  below,  slightly 
anterior  to  anus.  Bursa  copulatrix  (Figs.  47,  48,  be)  small 
diverticulum,  connected  to  vagina  and  ventral  channel 
(vc)  by  wide  duct.  Wall  of  posterior  vagina  with  folds 
decreasing  in  number  posteriorly.  Capsule  gland  with 
simple,  inconspicuous  ventral  channel  posteriorly  con- 
nected to  large,  well-de\eloped  ingesting  gland  filled 


with  w hitish  substance.  .Albumen  gland  (Fig.  49)  large, 
arch-shaped,  elongate,  opening  anteriorly  into  ovi-sperm 
duct  (osd),  posteriorly  into  oviduct  (od). 

Male  Reproductive  System:  Penis  (Fig.  59)  bulbous,  short, 
dorso-\entrall\  flattened,  w  ith  large  papilla.  Penial  vas 
deferens  (Fig.  62.  p\d)  minute,  simple  duct,  closed  by 
overlapping  ventral  and  dorsal  sides  of  penis.  Cephalic 
vas  deferens  (Fig.  57,  cvd)  well  developed.  Prostate  gland 
(Fig.  57.  pr)  light  yellow;  prostate  duct  (prd)  dorso-ven- 
tral  slit  in  cross  section;  duct  open  to  mantle  cavit\  pos- 
teriorly. 

Alimentary  System:  Paired  accessory- salivar\  glands  short 
(<1  10  shell  height);  left  gland  intertwined  with  left 
salivary  gland,  right  gland  free,  situated  in  right  anterior 
corner  of  buccal  cavity.  Salivary  glands  in  center  of  dorsal 
buccal  ca\it\  between  gland  of  Leiblein  and  elongate 
\al\e  of  Leiblein.  Salivar\  ducts  attached  to  anterior 
esophagus  immediately  anterior  to  \alve.  Glandular  folds 
in  mid-esophageal  region  well  developed.  Connection 
betw  een  mid-esophagus  and  gland  of  Leiblein  short,  thick. 
Posterior  esophagus  appressed  to  left  side  of  gland  of 
Leiblein  in  loop-shaped  fashion.  Gland  of  Leiblein  yel- 
low ish;  posterior  blind  duct  short,  without  terminal  am- 
pulla. Stomach  tubular,  with  10-15  thin,  elevated  folds 
on  w all;  posterior  ones  oriented  toward  center,  anterior 
ones  merging  into  elevated  section  of  sorting  area.  In- 
testinal typhlosole  thin.  Two  digestive  diverticula  pres- 
ent. Rectal  gland  light  brown,  extending  along  '2  of  pal- 
lia] gonoduct. 

Radula:  Ribbon  length  40-45%  of  shell  height.  Base  of 
rachidian  tooth  expanded  below  base  of  neighboring  ra- 
chidian  tooth;  central  cusp  thin,  with  wide  base;  inner 
lateral  denticle  small  protrusion  from  base  of  lateral  cusps; 
outer  edge  of  lateral  cusp  straight,  with  several  faint 
denticles;  large  marginal  cusp  pointing  straight  forward 
and  parallel  to  faint,  elongate,  lateral  extension  at  base 
of  rachidian  tooth  (Figs.  32-34),  resulting  in  bifid  ap- 
pearance of  rachidian  basal  plate.  Lateral  teeth  shorter 
than  rachidian  width,  with  wide  bases  positioned  close 
together  (Fig.  32). 

Egg  capsules:  Discoidal,  lateral!)  flattened,  with  wide, 
equalK  flattened  base,  up  to  20  mm  in  height  (including 
base),  12  mm  in  width  (Harasewych,  1984,  Fig.  23). 
Capsules  yellowish  in  color,  and  containing  74-112  em- 
bryos (MeKill  &  Standen,  1898).  Capsules  deposited  in 
row  s  w  ith  flattened  edges  adjacent  to  one  another  (Lamv, 
1928;  D'Asaro,  1991). 

Ecology:  This  species  lives  in  the  rocky  intertidal  and 
subtidal  zones  where  barnacles  and  mussels  are  plentiful. 


10941.3.  Ushaia,  Tierra  del  Fuego,  Argentina,  height  41  mm;  1:{.I4  MCZ  1-32566.  Falkland  Islands.  Argentina,  height  47  mm). 
11.12  Operculum  iLACM  86-270.2,  Daniel  Este.  Isla  Grande.  Tierra  del  Fuego.  Chile,  height  11  mm);  11.  Outer  surface;  12. 
Inner  surface.  Figures  15-20  Ocenebra  erinacea.  Shells  (15.16  MCZ  87662.  \Ve\mouth.  England,  height  31  mm;  19,20  MCZ 
1724.50.  Fos-sur-Mer.  Bouches-du-Rhone,  France,  height  56  mm)  Operculum  (17.18  MCZ  302405,  St.  Lunaire.  France,  height  8  0 
mm);  17   Outer  surface;  18.  Inner  surface. 


Page  48 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


Figures  21-29  \ucclla  lapillus.  21,22  Shell  (MCZ  09192,  Freshwater  Bay,  Isle  ot  Wight,  England,  height  2.5  1  mm).  23-2.S 
Kadiila  (ISNM  8.570.53,  Kittery,  Maine,  LI.S.A.).  23.  Clentral  portion  of  radular  ribbon.  Scale  bar  =  15  fim.  24  Rachidian  teeth 
Scale  bar  =  10  ^m.  25.  Side  view  of  rachidian  teeth  (right  row  of  lateral  teeth  removed).  Scale  bar  =  10  fim.  26,29  Protoconch 
(MCZ  14184,  Isle  au  Ilaut,  Maine,  U.S.A.).  26.  Apical  view.  Scale  bar  =  12  m"'  29.  Side  view.  Scale  bar  =  12  ^m  27,28  Shell 
ultrastructure  (view  of  growing  edge;  innermost  layer  on  bottom)  (MCZ  69192,  Freshwater  Ba>,  Isle  of  Wight,  England)  Scale 
bars,  4.5  ixn\  and  70  niu,  respectively. 


S.  p.  Kool,  1993 


Page  49 


Figures  30-38.  Troplion  gcicrsianns.  30.31.  Sliell  (MC^Z  1.32566.  Falkland  Islands,  Argentina,  lu'iglit  -JT  mm).  32-3  4-.  Radula. 
(LACM  86-270.2.  Daniel  Kste.  Isia  Grande.  Tierra  del  Fuego.  Chile)  32.  Central  portion  of  radiilar  ribbon.  Scale  bar  =  45  nm. 
33.  Rachidian  teeth  Scale  liar  =  25  ^m.  34  Side  view  of  rachidian  teeth.  Scale  bar  =  20  ^in  35,38.  Protoconch  (LACM  86- 
270.2,  Daniel  Este,  Isla  Grande,  Tierra  tlel  Fuego,  Chile).  35.  Apical  view.  Scale  bar  =  150  ^m.  38  Side  view.  Scale  bar  =  150 
Mm  36.37  Shell  ultrastructure  (L.ACM  86-270  2,  Daniel  Fsle.  Isla  (Iraiide,  Tierra  del  F'liego,  Chile);  Scale  bars,  60  fim  and  150 
Mm,  respectivel) 


Page  50 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


4* 


^ 


39     W 


i 


■?•■,■  ■ 


40      ' 


i^BFjlg; 


^ 


atk..: 


.«► 


f43 


IP 

^*^. 

■^ 

Fif^ures  39-46.  Ocenebra  crinai-ciL  39,40,  Sliell  (MCZ  172450,  Fos-sur  Mer,  Botichfs-dii-Hlioiu",  France,  height  56  mm)  41-43 
Kathila  (MCZ  298425,  Roseoll,  France).  41  Oenlral  portion  of  rihhoii  Scale  bar  =  17  ^ni  42.  Rachichan  teeth  Scale  bar  =  8  ^m. 
43  Side  view  of  rachidian  teeth.  Scale  bar  =  9  m"i  44.46  Protoconch  (MC:Z  38369,  Kent,  Fngland)  44.  .Apical  view.  Scale  bar 
=  9(1  A/ni    46    Side  view.  Scale  bar  =  90  niu   45    Shell  iillrastnictiire  (MCZ  298425,  Roscoff,  France),  Scale  bar  =  1.30  ^m. 


S.  p.  Kool,  1993 


Page  51 


Figures  47-56.  Anatomical  structures  of  the  female  repro- 
ductive system  of  Nitcella  lapilltis.  Trophon  geversianus,  Oce- 
nehra  erinacea,  Muricanthus  fulvescens.  and  Thais  nodosa. 

47.50.53.  Bursa  copulatrix  in  iV  lapillus  and  T.  geversianus 
(47),  Th.  nodosa  (50),  O   erinacea  ami  M.  fulvesccns  (53). 

48.51.54.  Cross  sections  through  bursa  copulatrix  (location 
indicated  b>'  vertical  bar).  49,52.  Albumen  glands  in  N.  la- 
pillus. T  gever.'iianus.  O  erinacea.  M  Julvescens  (49),  anil 
Th.  nodosa  (52),  55,56.  Sagittal  section  through  foot  showing 
accessory  boring  organ  and  pedal  gland  of  Th.  nodosa,  T 
geversianus,  M.  julvescens  (55),  N .  lapillus.  and  O.  erinacea 
(56). 

abo,  acces.sory  boring  organ;  be,  bursa  copulatrix,  db,  duct  to  bursa 
copulatrix;  leg,  left  lobe  of  capsule  gland,  od,  oviduct,  osd.  ovi-sperm 
duct;  pg,  ventral  pedal  gland;  p,sr.  posterior  seminal  receptacles,  rcg. 
right  lobe  of  capsule  gland,  tf,  transverse  fold;  vc.  ventral  channel,  \cf, 
flange  of  the  ventral  chaiuiel,  vo.  vaginal  opening. 


Sculpture  of  the  shell  may  vary  v\  itli  the  t\  pe  ot  habitat 

Distribution:  Southern  Argentina  to  Chile. 

Ocenebra  erinacea: 

Shell:  Protoconch  (Figs.  44,  46)  conical,  low,  of  l'/2  smooth 
whorls,  and  with  impressed  suture;  transition  to  teleo- 
conch  smooth,  difhcult  to  discern.  Teleoconch  elongate, 
fusiform,  biconical  (Figs.  15,  16,  19,  20,  39,  40),  of  7-8 
whorls.  Adult  shell  highly  variable  in  shape,  to  55  mm 
in  height,  25  mm  in  width  (not  including  spine  length; 
35  mm  including  spine  length).  Body  whorl  55-60?c  of 
shell  height,  with  3-9  varices,  often  with  frilled  edges, 
and  with  (3-8  spiral  cords.  Aperture  (to  30%  of  shell  height) 
round  to  oval;  outer  lip  with  crenulated  edge  Moderately 
callused  columella.  Siphonal  canal  partly  or  completely 
closed,  often  nearly  equal  in  length  to  aperture  in  larger 


Figures  57-64  .■\nal<imical  structures  ol  the  male  rcjiroductive 
system  of  S'ucclla  lapillus.  Trophon  geversianus.  Ocenebra 
erinacea.  Muricanthus  fukescens,  and  Thais  nodosa.  Prostate 
gland  with  proximal  and  distal  cross  sections  in  N.  lapillus.  T. 
geversianus.  O  erinacea,  M .  julvescens  (57)  and  Th.  nodosa 
(58).  Penial  morphologies  with  cross  sections  in  T.  geversianus 
(59.62),  N.  lapillus.  M.  fulvesccns  {f>0,b2).  O  erinacea  (60.63), 
and  Th    nodosa  (61,64). 

b\ ,  blood  vessel,  cvd,  cephalic  vas  deferens;  p,  penis,  pr,  prostate,  prd, 
duct  through  prostate,  pvd,  penial  vas  deferens. 


specimens.  Siphonal  fasciole  pointing  away  from  si- 
phonal  canal.  Shell  color  yellov\ish  to  cream  or  dark 
brown;  aperture,  columella  white. 

Shell  ultrastructure:  Innermost  layer  of  crossed-lamellar 
aragonite,  with  crystal  planes  oriented  perpendicular  to 
growing  edge  [15-20%  of  thickness];  followed  by  layer 
of  crossed-lamellar  aragonite,  with  crystal  planes  ori- 
ented parallel  to  growing  edge  [40-45%  of  thickness]; 
followed  by  layer  of  crossed-lamellar  aragonite,  with 
crystal  planes  oriented  perpendicular  to  growing  edge 
[5-8%.  of  thickness];  outermost  layer  of  calcite  [35%.  of 
thickness]  (Fig.  45). 

Operculum:  D-shaped,  with  lateral  nucleus  in  lower  right 
(Figs.  17,  18).  Outer  surface  (Fig.  17)  with  arch-shaped 
growth  lines  progressively  upright,  recurved  at  upper 
end;  inner  surface  (Fig.  18)  with  4-5  arch-shaped  growth 
lines,  w  ith  broad  (~  Vz  opercular  w  idth),  lightly  callused, 
glazed  outer  rim. 

Head  and  foot:  I'niformly  light  yellow  to  white.  Ce- 
phalic tentacles  elongate,  thin.  Incurrent  siphon  well  de- 
veloped. Mantle  edge  smooth,  occasionally  with  crenu- 
lations  (possibly  an  artifact).  Sole  of  foot  w  ith  large  lateral 


Page  52 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


(0 


s 


(0 
(0 


c 
o 

Q. 
O 


(0 

c 

O 

o 


i5 


8-1 

10- 

11  - 

4  - 
3- 

— 

8- 

16- 

- 

12  - 

11  - 

3- 

13- 

7- 
5  - 

- 

10  - 
9- 

- 

- 

8- 

17  - 

- 

5- 

15  - 

- 

4- 

14- 

- 

3  - 

6  - 

- 

4  - 
1  - 

- 

13- 

^ 

2- 

— 

Fipurp  65  Cladciyram,  based  on  analysis  of  data  in  Table  1, 
shduiiig  high  |)ii\l()geiietic  affinity  between  Nucclla  and  Oce- 
nebra.  Numbers  next  to  character  changes  correspond  to  num- 
bers given  to  characters  in  Table  1.  Alternative,  equally  par- 
simonious character  state  transformation  series  are  possible  for 
characters  3,  4,  5,  and  8  (see  text). 


folds.  Accessory  boring  organ  (Fig.  56,  abo)  large,  well 
developed,  (in  females)  anterior  to,  separate  from  equally 
large  ventral  pedal  gland  (Fig.  56,  pg). 

Mantle  Cavity.  Ospliradium  (<'/2  ctenidial  length,  % 
ctenidial  width)  partially  extending  over  ctenidium.  Right 
pectin  usually  wider  than  left.  Each  lamella  ( 10-1  l/mm) 
attached  to  mantle  roof  along  short  basal  portion.  An- 
teriormost  portion  of  ctenidium  straight,  extending  an- 
teriorly of  osphradium.  (Ctenidial  lamellae  (11-12/mm) 
basically  triangular,  longer  than  high  w  ith  convex  lateral 
edges  posteriorly.  Lamellar  support  rods  not  well  devel- 
oped. 

Female  Reproductive  System:  Vaginal  opening  (Fig.  53, 
vo)  round  to  elongate,  on  short,  extension  of  pallial  gon- 


oduct,  situated  below,  posterior  to  anus.  Bursa  copulatrix 
(Figs.  53,  54,  be)  large  diverticuhmi  (equal  in  diameter 
to  capsule  gland),  connected  at  its  anterior  portion  to 
duct  running  parallel  to  ventral  channel  for  some  length 
prior  to  connecting  with  it  (Figs.  53,  54,  db).  Lumen  of 
bursa  copulatrix  Oiled  w  ith  loose  flocculent  material  and 
iridescent  spherules.  Capsule  gland  posterior  to,  shorter 
than  bursa  copulatrix.  Ventral  channel  (Figures  53,  54, 
vc)  well  developed  anteriorly,  less  distinct  posteriorly. 
Ingesting  gland  situated  between  capsule  gland,  albumen 
gland.  Albumen  gland  (Fig.  49)  arch-shaped,  elongate, 
opening  anteriorly  into  ovi-sperm  duct  (osd)  posteriorly 
into  oviduct  (od).  Ovary  orange-yellow.  Pseudo-penis  oc- 
casionally present  (see  also  Feral,  1976). 

Male  Reproductive  System.  Penis  (Fig.  60)  simple,  dor- 
so-ventrally  flattened,  elongate,  slightly  curved,  with 
abruptly  tapering,  papilla-like  end.  Penial  vas  deferens 
(Fig.  63,  pvd)  a  wide,  straight  tube  star-shaped  in  cross 
section;  tube  partialK  attached  to  penial  wall  Cephalic 
vas  deferens  (Fig.  57,  cvd)  large,  similar  to  penial  vas 
deferens  in  structure,  extending  from  penis  (p)  to  prostate 
gland  (pr).  Prostate  gland  (Fig.  57,  pr)  white  to  yellow; 
prostate  duct  (prd)  a  dorso-ventral  slit  in  cross  section 
anteriorK  ,  a  triangular  large  space  posteriori)-;  duct  open 
to  mantle  cavity  posteriorly  (Fig.  57).  Posterior  vas  de- 
ferens white  to  dirty  white,  iridescent.  Testis  yellowish. 

Alimentary  System:  Paired  accessory  salivary  glands  very 
long  (*  '/2  shell  height);  left  gland  intertwined  with  left 
salivary  gland,  right  gland  free, situated  in  right  anterior 
corner  of  buccal  cavity.  Salivary  glands  in  center  of  dorsal 
buccal  cavity  between  gland  of  Leibleiii  and  short,  pear- 
shaped  valve  of  Leiblein.  Salivary  ducts  attached  to  an- 
terior esophagus  at  short  distance  from  valve.  Glandular 
folds  in  mid-esophageal  region  swollen,  especially  well 
developed  at  connecting  point  between  esophagus  and 
gland  of  Leiblein.  C-onnection  between  mid-esophagus 
and  gland  of  Leiblein  short,  thick.  Posterior  esophagus 
appressed  to  left  side  of  gland  of  Leiblein  in  loop-shaped 
fashion.  Gland  of  Leiblein  yellowish;  posterior  blind  duct 
very  short  (<V2  length  gland  of  Leiblein),  with  promi- 
nent terminal  am|Milla.  Stomach  tubular,  w  ith  faint  folds 
on  stomach  wall  oriented  tow ard  center  of  stomach  (poorly 
preserved  in  specimens  examined).  Rectal  gland  thin, 
green,  extending  along  V2  oi  pallial  gonoduct.  Large  pa- 
pilla overla\  ing  anus 

Radula:  Riblion  length  35-40%  shell  height.  Base  of  ra- 
chidian  tooth  expanded  below  base  of  neighboring  ra- 
chidian  tooth;  central  cusp  of  rachidian  thin,  flame- 
shaped,  leaning  more  anteriorly  (in  situ)  than  lateral 
cusps;  inner  lateral  ilenticle  low  on  base  of  lateral  cusp, 
occasionally  bifurcate  (w  ithiii  same  specimen);  outer  edge 
of  lateral  cusp  straight,  with  several  short  denticles;  large 
marginal  cus()  pointing  straight  forward  and  parallel  to 
elongate,  lateral  extension  at  base  of  rachidian  tooth  (Figs. 
41-43),  resulting  in  bihd  appearance  of  rachidian  basal 
plate.  Lateral  teeth  with  narrow  base,  wideK  spaced, 
shorter  than  rachidian  width  (Fig.  41). 


S.  P   Kool,  1993 


Page  53 


Egg  capsules:  Oval-elongale,  vase-shapt-il,  trianuulai  in 
cross  section.  Capsules  \ell()\visli,  up  to  13  mm  in  lu-iulit, 
6  mm  in  width,  each  on  narrow  stalk,  attached  b\  Hat 
base.  Apex  with  short  elevated  protuberance  with  mu- 
cous plug  Each  capsule  containing  4-167  embryos,  of 
which  none  are  nurse  eggs  (Fretter  &  Graham,  1985; 
Lebour,  1937). 

Ecology:  Occncbra  crinacea  li\es  in  the  rocky  intertidal 
and  subtidal  zones  (Jeffreys,  1867)  to  150  meters  (Fretter 
&  Graham,  1985)  where  it  feeds  on  oysters  and  other 
bivalves  (Fretter  &  Graham,  1985),  barnacles  ami  limpets 
(Graham,  1955).  Lebour  (1937)  reported  tireediiii;  in  late 
spring  ant!  summer  Juveniles  hatch  from  the  eggs  after 
12-14  weeks  (Fretter  &  Graham,  1985).  A  comprehensive 
ecophysiologicai  study  was  done  on  Ocenebra  erinacea 
by  Hawkins  (1985) 

Distribution:  Nfirth  Atlantic  Ocean  (Spain  to  Norway, 
Great  Britain,  Ireland);  Mediterranean  Sea  (southern  Eu- 
rope, northern  Africa). 

CLAPISTIC  ANALYSIS 

The  cladistic  analysis  yielded  one  tree  with  a  consistency 
inde.x  of  0.88  (Fig.  65).  This  cladogram  indicates  that: 
1)  placement  of  \ucclla  in  Thaidinae  or  its  senior  syn- 
on\  ni,  Rapaninae,  creates  polyphyletic  groups  (see  also 
Kool,  1989);  2)  Nucclla  is  more  closely  related  to  Oce- 
nebra than  to  Troplwn  and  should  be  placed  in  Oce- 
nebrinae;  3)  the  subfamilial  boundaries  between  Oce- 
nebrinae  and  Tro[)honinae  are  much  less  distinct  than 
previousK  accepted. 

Characters  and  character  state  distribution  among  the 
taxa  Nucclla.  Trophon.  Ocenebra.  Thais,  and  the  out- 
group,  Muricanthus: 

Character  1.  Protoconch:  0.  multispiral  (  >  2  whorls);  1, 
paucispiral  (<  1':  whorls). 

Nucella.  Trophon  and  Occncbra  (Figs.  26,  29,  35,  38, 
44,  46)  have  a  paucispiral,  smooth  protoconch  without  a 
sinusigeral  notch  or  outwardly-flared  lip.  This  morphol- 
ogy reflects  direct  development.  The  outgroup  and  the 
rapanines  have  a  multispiral  (and  generalK  sculptured) 
protoconch  w  ith  a  sinusigeral  notch  and  outwaril-tlaring 
lip,  t\pical  for  species  v\itli  a  pianktonic  larval  stage. 

Character  2.  Calcitic  layer;  0.  absent;  1.  present. 

The  outgroup  lacks  an  outer  calcitic  shell  layer  that  is 
present  in  the  other  four  ta.xa.  The  presence  of  calcite 
appears  to  be  the  derived  condition. 

Character  3.  Number  of  aragonitic  layers:  0.  3;  1.  4;  2.  2 
The  outgroup  and  Ocenebra  have  three  layers  of  ara- 
gonite  (transverse,  collabral,  transverse),  Thais  has  an 
additional,  innermost  fourth  layer  of  crystals  oriented  in 
a  45°  angle;  both  Nucella  and  Trophon  have  two  layers 
(transverse,  collabral),  but  may  lack  the  innermost  trans- 
verse layer  (Figs.  28,  37). 

Character  4.  Nucleus  of  operculum:  0.  terminal  nucleus 
in  lower  right;  1.  lateral  nucleus  in  lower  right;  2.  lateral 


niiclfus  licldw  center  right;  3  lateral  nucleus  in  center 
right. 

The  outgroup  has  a  terminal  nucleus  in  the  lower  right. 
.All  iiigroup  taxa  have  a  lateral  nucleus,  the  position  of 
w  Inch  varies.  The  nucleus  of  the  operculum  in  Nucella 
is  located  below  the  center  right;  that  of  Trophon  and 
Ocenebra  in  the  lower  right  (Figs.  7,  11,  17,  respectively). 
The  nucleus  is  located  in  the  center  right  in  rapanines. 

C;haracter  5,  Shape  of  operculum:  0.  oval;  1.  D-shaped. 
The  opercula  of  Nucella,  Thais,  and  Ocenelna  are 
roughly  D-shaped   Those  of  Muricanthus  and  Trophon 
are  elongate-oval. 

(Character  6,  Pigmentation  pattern  of  head-toot  region: 
0  jjresent;  flecked  with  black  and  gra\;  1.  absent,  uni- 
formly colored  (faint  yellow  ). 

The  head-foot  regions  of  Nucella,  Trophon,  and  Oce- 
nebra are  uniformly  faint  yellow.  Both  Thais  and  the 
outgroup  are  densely  flecked  with  black  blotches  and 
specks  (this  pattern  generalK  survives  preservation  in 
alcohol  although  other  colors,  such  as  white  and  yellow, 
fade). 

Character  7.  Ventral  pedal  gland  and  accessory  boring 
organ:  0.  sharing  one  duct;  1.  with  separate  ducts. 

In  Nucella  and  Ocenebra,  the  accessory  boring  organ 
and  ventral  pedal  gland  (Fig.  56,  abo,  pg)  have  separate 
ducts  to  the  sole  of  the  loot,  while  in  Trophon,  rapanines, 
and  the  outgroup  these  structures  share  a  common  duct 
(Fig.  55,  abo,  pg). 

CJiaracter  8.  Bursa  copulatrix:  0.  large  diverticulum,  sep- 
arate from  capsule  gland;  1.  small  diverticulum,  separate 
from  capsule  gland;  2.  small  chamber  with  lumen  con- 
tinuous with  capsule  gland. 

The  bursa  copulatrix  is  a  small  blind  sack  in  Nucella 
and  Trophon  (Fig.  47),  a  large  separate  diverticulum  in 
Ocenebra  (Fig.  53)  and  the  outgroup,  while  in  rapanines 
the  bursa  is  continuous  with  the  capsule  gland  (Figs.  50, 
51). 

Character  9.  Seminal  receptacles  at  dorsal  periphery  of 
albumen  gland:  0.  absent;  I.  present. 

In  Thais,  a  row  of  posterior  seminal  receptacles  (Fig. 
52.  psr)  at  the  dorsal  periphery  of  the  albumen  gland 
presumably  increases  efficiency  in  the  fertilization  pro- 
cess (Kool,  1988,  1989).  These  posterior  seminal  recep- 
tacles are  absent  in  Nucella,  Trophon.  Ocenebra.  and  in 
the  outgroup,  Muricanthus  (Fig.  49).  This  character  is 
a  synapomorphy  for  Rapaninae  (Kool,  1993,  in  press). 

Character  10.  Penial  shape:  0.  simple,  elongate  to  lightly 
curved;  1.  bulbous,  with  papilla;  2  strongK  recurved 
with  pseudo-papilla. 

Penial  shape  in  Nucella.  Ocenebra.  and  the  outgroup 
is  elongate  (F"ig.  60).  The  penis  in  Thais  is  strongly 
recurved,  and  sinuous  (Fig.  61),  while  that  of  Trophon 
is  short,  bulbous,  with  a  distinct  papilla  (Fig.  59). 

(Character  11  Penial  \as  deferens:  0.  simple  duct;  1. 
small,  loose  duct-w  ithin-a-duct;  2.  large  duct-within-a- 
duct,  partialK  attached  to  penial  iiuier  wall 


Page  54 


THE  NAUTILUS.  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


Nucella,  Trophon  and  the  outgroiip  have  a  peiiial  vas 
deferens  that  is  loosely  closed,  while  rapanines  have  a 
■■duct-vvithiii-a-duct"  system  (Figs.  61,  64)  (Kool,  1988, 
1989).  Ocenehra  differs  from  both  types  in  having  a 
rather  wide  inner  duct  that  is  partially  attached  to  the 
penial  inner  wall  (Fig.  63). 

Character  12.  Prostate  Gland:  0.  open  to  mantle  cavity 
posteriorly;  1.  without  opening  to  mantle  cavity. 

Males  of  Nucella.  Trophon.  Occnelrra.  and  the  out- 
group  have  a  prostate  gland  that  is  open  to  the  mantle 
cavity  along  its  posterior  portion  (Fig.  57).  The  prostate 
of  rapanine  males  does  not  open  to  the  mantle  cavity 
(Fig.  58). 

Character  13.  Accessory  salivary  gland  length:  0.  right 
gland  small,  left  gland  absent;  1.  glands  <  '/i  shell  height; 
2.  glands  >  V2  shell  height. 

Character  14.  Straw-like  membrane  around  gland  of 
Leiblein:  0.  present;  1.  absent. 

In  most  rapanines  and  the  outgroup,  the  gland  of  Leib- 
lein is  covered  by  a  thick  membrane  of  interwoven  fibers 
of  connective  tissue,  producing  a  straw-like  appearance. 
Such  a  membrane  is  absent  in  Nucella.  Trophon  and 
Ocenehra. 

Character  15.  Posterior  duct  of  gland  of  Leiblein:  0. 
longer  than  Vz  of  gland  length;  1.  shorter  than  V2  gland 
length. 

In  Nucella,  Trophon  and  Ocenehra.  the  gland  of  Leib- 
lein tapers  posteriorly  into  a  thin,  very  short  posterior 
duct  that  runs  adjacent  to  the  posterior  esophagus  and 
is  often  filled  with  secretory  material  from  the  gland;  in 
the  majority  of  rapanines  and  in  the  outgroup  this  duct 
is  much  longer,  extending  into  the  dorsal  branch  of  the 
afferent  renal  vein. 

Character  16.  Central  cusp  of  rachidian:  0.  oriented  in 
same  plane  as  lateral  cusps;  1.  leaning  more  anteriorly 
than  lateral  cusps. 

In  Nucella  (Fig.  25)  and  Ocenehra  (Fig.  43)  the  central 
cusp  on  the  rachidian  leans  more  anteriorly  (in  situ )  than 
the  lateral  cusps.  In  Thais.  Trophon  (Fig.  34),  and  the 
outgroup,  the  lateral  cusps  and  central  cusp  are  aligned 
in  the  same  plane. 

Character  17.  Margin  of  rachidian  basal  plate:  0.  straight; 
1.  bifid. 

The  bifid  condition  of  the  rachidian  basal  plate  (Figs. 
25,  34,  most  developed  in  Fig.  43)  is  found  in  Nucella, 
Trophon  and  Oceneina,  but  not  in  Thais  or  the  outgroup. 

Synapornorphies  for  the  Nucella-Ocenehra  clade  {Fig. 
65): 

Character  5:  The  character  for  opercular  shape  is  ho- 
moplastic; a  D-shaped  operculum  occurs  in  Thais  as  well. 

C]haracter  7:  Both  Nucella  and  Ocenehra  have  separate 
openings  for  the  ventral  pedal  gland  and  accessory  boring 
organ  (Fig.  56,  abo,  pg).  Female  specimens  of  Trophon 
geversianus,  Thais  nodosa,  and  the  outgroup,  have  a 
single  duct  and  opening  for  these  organs  (l"ig.  55,  abo. 


pg).  A  shared  duct  for  the  accessory  boring  organ  and 
ventral  pedal  gland,  as  found  in  Trophon  geversianus, 
may  not  be  as  advantageous  as  an  arrangement  as  w  hen 
the  ducts  originating  from  the  accessory  boring  organ 
and  ventral  pedal  gland  are  separate.  It  would  appear 
that  an  arrangement  where  one  duct  serves  both  as  ven- 
tral pedal  gland  and  as  a  passage  for  the  accessory  boring 
organ  and  its  secretions  during  boring  activities  (Carri- 
ker,  1981)  prevents  the  female  from  boring  activity,  and 
thus  perhaps  feeding  in  general,  during  stages  of  egg- 
laying. 

Character  13:  Nucella  and  Ocenehra  have  a  pair  of  very 
long  accessory  salivary  glands  (>  ','2  shell  height).  Tro- 
p/!o;(andT/ia!shavemuchsmallerglands(<  '/^  shell  height). 
The  outgroup  has  only  one  extremely  small  right  acces- 
sory salivary  gland. 

Character  16:  In  Nucella,  and  to  a  much  greater  degree 
in  Ocenehra,  the  central  cusp  leans  more  anteriorly  (Figs. 
25,  43,  respectively)  (in  situ)  than  the  lateral  cusps, 
whereas  in  Trophon,  the  central  cusp  is  aligned  with  the 
lateral  cusps  (Fig.  34). 

Synapornorphies  for  the  Trophon-Nucella-Ocenehra 
Clade: 

Character  1:  The  paucispiral  protoconch  is  indicative  of 
having  crawl-away  larvae,  rather  than  a  planktonic  larval 
stage  that  is  found  in  Thais  and  other  rapanines  (Kool, 
1993,  in  press)  and  the  outgroup. 

Character  4:  The  cladogram  suggests  that  an  opercular 
nucleus  below  the  center  right  (Nucella;  character  state 
2)  evolved  from  the  ancestral  condition  for  the  taxa  in 
this  clade  of  having  a  nucleus  in  the  lower  right  (Oce- 
nehra and  Trophon;  character  state  1). 

Character  6:  All  three  taxa  lack  a  pigmentation  pattern 
on  their  head-foot  region  that  is  found  in  the  outgroup, 
Thais,  and  other  members  of  the  Rapaninae. 

Character  14:  The  straw-like  outer  membrane  of  the 
gland  of  Leiblein  is  absent  in  the  species  of  this  clade, 
but  present  in  the  outgroup,  and  most  members  of  Ra- 
paninae (Kool,  1989;  1993,  in  press). 

Character  15:  The  posterior  duct  of  the  gland  of  Leiblein 
is  shorter  than  V2  the  length  ot  the  gland  itself  in  this 
clade,  but  much  longer  in  the  remaining  taxa,  reaching 
into  the  dorsal  branch  of  the  afferent  renal  vein. 

Character  17:  The  bifid  condition  of  the  basal  plate, 
especially  well  developed  in  Ocenehra  (Fig.  43),  is  absent 
in  Thais  and  the  outgroup. 

Synaponiorphics  for  the  Thais-Trophon -Nucella-Oce- 
nehra Clade: 

Character  2:  An  outer  layer  of  calcite  is  present  in  all 
ingroup  taxa,  but  is  absent  in  the  outgroup. 

Character  13:  The  outgroup  has  only  one  extremely  small 
right  accessory  .sali\ar>  gland.  A  situation  of  having  a 
pair  of  medium-size  accessory  salivary  glands  appears  to 


S.  p.  Kool,  1993 


Page  55 


have  evolved  from  the  condition  described  above  and  to 
have  given  rise  to  the  most  deri\ed  condition  (extremely 
long  glands). 


DISCUSSION 

According  to  the  topology  of  the  cladogram  (Fig.  65), 
two  characters  have  evolved  in  a  parallel  manner  in 
Nucella  lapillus  and  Trophon  geversianus.  Out  of  the 
context  of  the  cladogram,  these  similarities  would  suggest 
a  closer  relationship  between  these  two  species  than  is 
suggested  by  the  tree  topology: 

Character  3:  Shell  ultrastructure  in  both  Nucella  and 
Trophon  consists  of  two  aragonitic  layers  and  an  outer 
layer  of  calcite.  Specimens  of  both  may  lack  the  inner- 
most (transverse)  layer  (Figs.  28,  37).  More  detailed  stud- 
ies may  reveal  the  cause  of  this  variation.  Perhaps  en- 
vironmental factors  may  play  a  role  (Etter,  personal 
communication). 

Character  8:  The  morphology  of  the  bursa  copulatrix  of 
Nucella  is  very  similar  to  that  of  Trophon.  In  both  taxa, 
a  relatively  small,  muscular  blind  sack  branches  off  from 
the  vagina  (Figs.  47,  48).  In  Ocenebra  the  bursa  is  thin- 
walled  and  equal  in  width  and  height  to  the  capsule 
gland,  extending  for  up  to  V2  the  length  of  the  pallial 
complex.  The  ventral  channel  loops  backwards  towards 
the  anterior  portion  of  the  bursa  in  Ocenebra  (Fig.  53), 
rather  than  straight  up  into  the  bursa  as  in  Trophon  and 
Nucella  (Fig.  47). 

The  above  two  characters  could  be  considered  synapo- 
morphies  for  an  alternative,  but  less  parsimonious,  tree 
in  which  Trophon  and  Nucella  would  be  united  in  one 
clade.  However,  in  the  proposed  phylogenetic  hypothesis 
(Fig.  65),  four  synapomorphies  support  a  clade  consisting 
of  Nucella  and  Ocenebra.  rendering  the  above  two  char- 
acters as  homoplastic. 

Fretter  and  Graham  (1962)  mention  several  similari- 
ties in  egg  capsule  morphology  between  Nucella  lapillus 
and  Ocenebra  erinacea.  Both  species  lay  vase-shaped 
capsules,  whereas  Trophon  geversianus  produces  dis- 
coidal  egg  capsules.  However,  having  discoidal  egg  cap- 
sules is  only  an  autapomorphic  trait  for  Trophon  and 
does  not  provide  clues  about  relationship  in  this  case. 
Alternative,  equally  parsimonious  transformation  series 
are  possible  for  characters  3,  4,  5,  and  8.  For  Characters 
3,  5,  and  8,  I  chose  the  scenario  involving  homoplasy 
over  one  involving  a  reversal  to  avoid  an  "artificial" 
increase  in  synapomorphies.  Similarly,  for  Character  4, 
I  chose  the  least  linear  trans-formation  series  ("zero  state" 
evolving  into  both  the  "three  state"  and  the  "one  state"). 

Zoogeographical  data  reveal  that  members  of  Nucella, 
Ocenebra  and  Trophon  occur  primarily  in  colder  waters 
of  the  temperate  and  boreal  zones,  whereas  rapanines 
and  the  outgroup  occur  primarily  in  warmer  waters  of 
the  (sub)tropics  (Kool,  1989). 

Nucella  lapillus  and  Ocenebra  erinacea  overlap  for 
much  of  their  ranges  in  primarily  temperate  western 
European  waters.  In  addition,  N.  lapillus  occurs  in  the 


western  Atlantic,  where  O.  erinacea  does  not,  and  O. 
erinacea  occurs  in  the  Mediterranean,  where  N.  lapillus 
has  not  occurred  since  the  Pleistocene  [Malatesta  (1960) 
cited  records  of  N.  lapillus  from  the  Pleistocene  of  Sicily]. 
Cooke  (1915),  in  a  comprehensive  list  of  localities  for 
Nucella  lapillus,  showed  that  the  southernmost  record 
for  this  species  is  the  Algarve  coast  of  Portugal  and  al- 
leged that  any  records  from  Northern  Africa  (see  Nord- 
sieck,  1982),  the  western  Mediterranean,  the  Azores,  and 
the  Canary  Islands,  are  highly  suspect.  Other  members 
of  what  can  be  assumed  to  be  Ocenebra  s.s.  and  Nucella 
s.s.  are  found  in  the  eastern  Pacific  (Abbott,  1974)  and 
the  northern  I'acific.  Furthermore,  Ocenebra  s.s.  occurs 
in  western  Africa  (Houart,  1989)  and  South  Africa  (Kil- 
burn  &  Rippey,  1982).  Ranges  of  these  genera  may  be 
revised  when  more  Ocenebra-like  taxa  (for  example  from 
Japan)  and  Nucclla-Uke  species  have  been  examined  with 
respect  to  their  anatomy,  radula,  shell  ultrastructure,  etc. 
Such  studies  are  also  necessary  to  determine  if,  for  ex- 
ample, species  such  as  Nucella  dubia  and  Nucella  squa- 
mosa, both  from  the  South  African  Province,  are  indeed 
members  of  Nucella  s.s.  It  appears  from  preliminary 
dissections  that  the  genus  Nucella  can  no  longer  be  con- 
sidered restricted  to  the  temperate  waters  of  the  northern 
hemisphere  (Kool,  in  preparation). 

Trophon  geversianus,  limited  to  the  South  American 
continent,  lives  in  temperate  to  boreal  waters,  as  do  Nu- 
cella lapillus  and  Ocenebra  erinacea. 


SYSTEMATIC  CONCLUSIONS 

The  high  degree  of  similarity  in  anatomy,  radula,  pro- 
toconch,  shell  ultrastructure  and  operculum  in  Ocenebra 
erinacea,  Trophon  geversianus  and  Nucella  lapillus  in- 
dicates that  these  three  taxa  are  more  closely  related  to 
one  another  than  any  one  of  them  is  to  Thais  or  other 
representatives  of  Rapaninae.  Nucella  should  therefore 
be  excluded  from  Rapaninae  to  maintain  monophyly 
(Kool,  1989;  1993,  in  press).  The  difficulty  of  correctly 
allocating  Nucella  to  a  subfamily  is  indicative  of  the 
dilemma  of  our  lack  of  understanding  of  higher  muri- 
coidean  systematics.  The  cladistic  analysis  and  the  re- 
sulting cladogram  (Fig.  65)  suggest  that  Nucella  is  better 
placed  in  Ocenebrinae  than  in  Trophoninae.  It  is  obvious 
that  the  boundaries  of  groups  at  the  higher  taxonomic 
categories,  traditionally  based  on  shell  characters,  be- 
come less  clear  after  completion  of  thorough  anatomical 
studies  of  members  from  different  genera  and  subfam- 
ilies. Results  shown  here  suggest  that  Trophon  geversi- 
anus, the  type  species  of  Trophoninae,  is  closely  related 
to  Nucella  and  Ocenebra.  Perhaps  it  is  more  closelv 
related  to  the  latter  two  taxa  than  to  other  species  hitherto 
included  in  Trophoninae.  It  is  beyond  the  scope  of  this 
paper  to  suggest  synonymization  of  Trophoninae  with 
Ocenebrinae.  However,  I  suspect  that  future  studies  will 
show  that  Trophoninae  is  not  a  monophyletic  group  and 
that  a  new  name  for  some  of  its  members  may  be  war- 
ranted. The  following  systematic  arrangement  is  pro- 
posed for  the  taxa  treated  herein: 


Page  56 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


MURICOIDEA  Rafinesque,  1815 

MURICIDAE  Rafinesque,  1815 

RAPANTNAE  Gray,  1853  (sen.su  Kool,  1993,  in  press) 

Thais  Roding,  1798 
OCENEBRINAE  Cossmann,  1903 

Ocenebra  Gray,  1847 

Nucella  R6ding,  1798 
TROPHONINAE  Cossmann,  1903) 

Trophon  Montfort,  1810 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

I  thank  Drs.  Richard  S.  Houbrick,  M.  G.  Harasevvych, 
and  Kenneth  J.  Boss  for  reviewing  an  early  draft  of  this 
manuscript.  I  thank  the  staff  of  the  Scanning  Electron 
Microscope  Laboratories  at  the  United  States  National 
Museum  of  Natural  History  and  the  Smithsonian  Marine 
Station  at  Link  Port,  Ft.  Pierce,  for  their  assistance.  Dis- 
cussions with  Dr.  Diana  Lipscomb  were  of  great  help  in 
fine-tuning  the  section  on  the  cladistic  analysis.  Dr.  An- 
ders Waren  kindly  sent  me  some  well-preserved  material 
of  Ocenebra  erinacea;  Dr.  James  H.  McLean  and  Mr. 
C.  Clifton  Coney  provided  specimens  of  Trophon  gev- 
ersianiis.  This  is  Contribution  No.  333  of  the  Smithsonian 
Marine  Station  at  Link  Port,  Ft.  Pierce,  Florida. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Abbott,  R  T,  1974,  American  Seashells,  2nd  edition.  \'an 
Nostrand  Reinhold  Company.  New  York,  663  pp. 

Agersborg,  H.  P.  K.  1929.  Factors  in  the  evolution  of  the 
prosobranchiate  mollusc  Thais  lapillus.  The  Nautilus  43(2): 
45-49. 

Ankel,  W.  E.  1937.  Der  feinere  Bau  ties  Kokons  der  Purpur- 
schnecke  Nucella  lapillus  (L  I  und  seine  Bedeutung  tiir  das 
Laichleben,  V'erhandkingen  der  Deutsclien  Zoologischen 
Geselischaft  Supplement    1077-86 

Bandel,  K.  1975.  Das  Embryonalgehiiuse  mariner  Prosobran- 
chier  der  Region  von  Banyuls-sur-Mer  I.  Teil.  Vie  et  Milieu 
25(1  Kser.  A):83-118. 

Bandel,  K.  1977.  Neogastropod  radulae  from  Ban\uls-sur- 
Mer.  Vie  et  Milieu,  27(2)(ser.  A):  191-232 

Bryan,  G.  W.,  Gibbs,  P.  E.,  Hummerstone,  L.  G,,  and  Burt,  G 
R.  1986  The  decline  of  the  gastropod  Nucella  lapillus 
around  South-West  England:  evidence  for  the  effect  of 
tributyltin  from  antifouling  paints  Journal  of  the  Marine 
Biological  Association  of  the  L'nited  Kingdom  66:61 1-640. 

Carriker,  M,  R.  1981.  Shell  penetration  and  feeding  by  na- 
ticaceaii  and  muricacean  pretlatory  gastropods:  a  synthe- 
sis. Malacologia  20(2):403-422, 

Colton,  H  S  1922.  Variation  in  the  dogwhelk  Thais  (Purpura 
auct.)  lapillus    Ecology  3:146-157. 

Gonnell,  J  H  1970.  A  predator-pre\  system  in  the  marine 
intertidai  region.  1.  lialanus  glamlula  and  several  pred- 
atory species  of  Thais.  Ecological  Monographs  40:49-78 

Cooke,  A.  H.  1915.  The  geographical  distribution  of  Purjjura 
lapillus  (L.).  Part  I:  in  palaearctic  waters.  Proceedings  of 
the  Malacological  Society  of  London  ll(4):192-209 

Cossmann,  A.  E.  M  1903.  Essais  de  Paleoconchologie  Coiii- 
paree.  Vol.  5.  Paris,  215  pp. 

Oothers,  J.  H.  1973.  On  variation  in  Nucella  la])illus  (L.): 
shell   shape   in   populations  from    I'cmbrokcshirc,   Soulli 


Wales.  Proceedings  of  the  Malacological  Societv  of  London 

40:318-327. 
Crothers,  J.  H.    1983.    \  ariation  in  dog-whelk  shells  in  relation 

to  wave  action  and  crab  predation.  Biological  Journal  of 

the  Linnean  Society  2085- 102 
Crothers,  J.  H.    1985.    Dog-whelks:  an  introduction  to  the  bi- 
ology of  Nucella  lapillus   Field  Studies  6:291-360. 
D'Asaro,  C.  N.    1991.    GunnarThorsons  world-wide  collection 

of  prosobranch  egg  capsules:  Muricidae.  Ophelia  ■351):1- 

101. 
Emien,  J.  M.    1966.    Time,  energy,  and  risk  in  two  species  of 

carnivorous  gastropod.  Ph.D.  dissertation.  University  of 

Washington,  Seattle,  Washington. 
Etter,  R.  J.     1987.    The  effect  of  wave  action  on  the  biology 

of  the  intertidai  snail  Nucella  lapillus   PhD  dissertation. 

Harvard  University,  Cambridge,  Massachusetts,  i-ix  +  198 

PP 

Feral.  C  1976  Repartition  geographique  des  femelles  a  trac- 
tus  genital  male  externe  chez  Ocenebra  erinacea  (L.),  es- 
pece  gonochorique.  Haliotis  7:29-30 

Fretter  V.  and  ,\.  Graham.  1962.  British  Prosobranch  Mol- 
luscs. Ray  Society,  London,  755  pp 

Fretter  V.  and  .\  tJraham.  1985.  The  prosobranch  molluscs 
of  Britain  and  Detmiark.  Part  8  -  Neogastropoda  Journal 
of  Molluscan  Studies,  Supplement  15:435-556. 

Gmelin,  J.  F.  1791.  /n;  Linnaeus,  Svstema  Naturae,  Tom  1, 
Pars  \'l.  pp.  3021-3909 

Graham,  A.  1941.  The  oesophagus  of  the  stenoglossan  pro- 
sobranchs.  Proceedings  of  the  Ro\  al  Societ\  of  Edinburgh 
61(l)(sec  B):l-23. 

Graham,  A.  1955.  Molluscan  diets  Proceedings  of  the  Mal- 
acological Society  of  London  31(3-4):144-159. 

Gray,  J.  E.  1847.  A  list  of  the  genera  of  Recent  Mollusca, 
their  synonyma  and  t\  pes  Proceedings  of  the  Zoological 
Society  of  London  15:129-219. 

Gray,  J  E.  1853.  On  the  division  of  ctenobranchous  gaster- 
opodous  Mollusca  into  larger  groups  and  families.The  .■\n- 
nals  and  Magazine  of  Natural  History  11  (Ser,2):124-133. 

Harasewych,  M.  G.  1984  C^omparati ve  anatom\  of  four  prim- 
itive muricacean  gastropods:  implications  for  trophonine 
phylogeny.  American  Malacological  Bulletin  3(1):  11-26. 

Haw  kins,  L.  E.  1985.  Ecoph\siological  studies  of  the  Euro- 
pean o\ster  drill  Ocenclna  crii^acca  (Linnaeus,  1758).  Ph.D. 
dissertation,  L'niversit\  of  Southampton,  England,  244  pp. 

Houart,  R  1989  Description  of  a  new  species  of  Ocenebra 
(Muricidae:  Ocenebrinae)  from  western  .\frica  Publica- 
9oes  Ocasionais  da  Sociedade  Portuguesa  de  Malacologia 
No.  13,  pp.  63-64. 

Jeffreys,  J.  G.  1867.  British  Conchology,  X'olume  4.  \'an  Voorst, 
Paternoster  Row,  London,  486  pp.,  8  pis. 

Jousseaume,  F.  1888.  Descriptions  des  mollusques  recueilles 
par  M.  leDr  Faurotdansla  Mer  Rouge etdu  Golfed  .\den. 
Memoires  de  la  Societe  Zoologique  de  F" ranee  112-223. 

Kilbnrn,  H.  and  E.  Rippe\.  1982.  Sea  Shells  of  Southern  .Af- 
rica  South  C:hina  Printing  Co  ,  Hong  Kong.  249  pp 

Kincaid,  T.  1957.  Local  races  and  clines  in  the  marine  gas- 
tropod Thais  lamellosa  Gmelin.  .^  population  study.  Cal- 
liosloma  Co.,  Seattle,  Washington,  75  pp  ,  65  pis. 

Kool,  S  I'  1986.  Systematic  revision  of  tliaulid  genera  based 
on  anatomy,  .\merican  Malacological  Bulletin  4:110. 

Kool,  S  P  1987  Significance  ol  raihilar  characters  in  recon- 
struction of  thaidid  ph>logeny  (Neogastropoda:Murica- 
cea).  The  Nautilu.s  101  l3l:  117-132. 

Kool,  S    I'      1988.     Aspects  of  the  anatonn   ol   Vluopurpiira 


S.  p.  Kool,  1993 


Page  57 


patula  (Prosobranchia:  Muricoidea:  Thaidinae),  new  com- 
bination, with  emphasis  on  the  reproductive  s\steni. 
Malacologia  29i2);37.3-382. 

Kool,  S.  P.  1989,  Ph\  logeneticanal>sis  of  the  suhlamii\  Thai- 
dinae (Prosobranchia:  Neogastropoda;  Muritidae)  Ph  D 
Dissertation,  The  George  Washington  I  niversit\,  Wash- 
ington, DC.  3-42  pp. 

Kool,  S.  P.  and  K.  J.  Boss.  1992.  Sucella  K.kling,  1798  (CJas- 
tropoda:  Muricidae):  tvpe  species.  The  Nautilus  106(1): 
21-23. 

Kool,  S.  P.  1993.  Phylogenetic  analysis  of  the  Rapaninae  (Neo- 
gastropoda: Muricidae).  Malacologia  (in  press). 

Lamy,  E.  1928.  La  ponte  chez  les  gasteropodes  prdsohraiiches. 
Journal  de  Conch) liologie  72(2)80-148 

Largen,  M.  J.  1967.  The  diet  of  (lie  dog-wliclk,  Succlla  la- 
pillua  (Gastropoda  Prosobranchia),  Journal  ot  Zoology  151: 
123-127. 

Lebour,  M.  \'.  1937.  Tlie  eggs  and  larvae  ol  the  lirilish  pro- 
sobranchs  with  special  reference  to  those  living  in  the 
plankton.  Journal  of  the  Marine  Biological  .'\ssociation  of 
the  United  Kingdom  22:105-166, 

Linnaeus,  C.    175S.    Systema  Naturae,  10th  ed,  Stockhohn,  824 

PP 

Malatesta,  .•\  1960  Malacofauna  Pleistocenica  di  Grammi- 
chele  Memorie  per  Servire  alia  Descrizione  della  Carta 
Geologica  d  Italia  121-392,  19  pis,  v\ith  letter  press, 

Melvill,  C.  and  R,  Standen.  1898.  Notes  on  a  collection  of 
marine  shells  from  Livelv  Island,  Falklands,  v\ith  list  of 
species.  Journal  of  Conchology  9(4):97-105. 

Montfort,  D.  de.  1810.  Conchy  liologie  Svstematique,  et  Clas- 
sification Methodique  des  Coquilles.  Part  2,  Paris,  676  pp. 

Moore,  H,  B,  1936.  The  biology  of  Purpura  lapilliis.  I,  Shell 
variation  in  relation  to  environment  Journal  of  the  Marine 
Biological  Association,  of  the  United  Kingdom  21:61-89, 

Moore,  H,'^B,  1938,  The  biology  of  Nucclla  lapillm.  Ill  Life 
history  and  relation  to  environmental  factors.  Journal  of 
the  Marine  Biological  Association  of  the  L'nited  Kingdom 
23:67-74, 

Murdoch,  W,  W,  1969.  Switching  in  general  predators:  ex- 
periments on  predator  specificity  and  stability  of  prey 
populations.  Ecological  Monographs  39:335-354, 

Nordsieck,  F  1982  Die  Europaischen  Meeres-Gehiiuse- 
schnecken  (Prosobranchia),  Fischer  Verlag,  Stuttgart,  539 
PP 

Oehlmann,  J  ,  E.  Stroben  and  P,  Fioroni,  1988,  Zur  .Anatomie 
und  Histologic  des  Fortpflanzungssystems  von  Nucella  la- 
pillus  (L.,  1758)  (Prosobranchia,  Stenoglossa).  Zoologische 
Anzeiger  221(3/4):101-116. 

Pallas,  P.  S.  1774.  Spicilegia  Zoologica,  Vol  1,  Part  10  Lange, 
Berolini,  41  pp.,  4  pis. 


Palmer,  R  I  1983.  Growth  rate  as  a  measure  ot  food  value 
in  thaidid  gastropods:  assumptions  and  implications  for 
prev  morphology  and  distribution.  Journal  of  Experimen- 
tal and  Marine  Biology  and  Ecology  7395-124 

Palmer,  R.  I.  1985.  .Adaptive  value  of  shell  variation  in  Thais 
lamctlosa.  effect  of  thick  shells  on  vulnerabilitv  to  and 
preference  bv'  crabs.  The  X'eliger  27(4):349-356, 

Pelseneer,  P,  1911,  Recherches  sur  I  embryologie  des  gastro- 
podes,  Memoires  de  I'.^cademie  ro\  ale  de  Belgique,  Classe 
des  sciences  3(2):1-167, 

Rafinesque,  C.  S.  1815.  Analyses  de  la  nature  ou  tableau  du 
univers  et  des  corps  organises.  Barravecchia,  Palermo,  pp. 
5-6.  136-149,  218-223. 

Risbec,  J  1937.  Les  irregularites  et  les  anomalies  du  devel- 
oppement  emlirv oiuiaire  chez  Murex  e'rinacetis  L.  et  chez 
Purpura  lapillus  L.  Bulletin  du  Laboratoire  Maritime  de 
Dinard  17:25-38, 

Robertson,  R,  1974,  Marine  prosobranch  gastropods.  Larval 
studies  and  svstematics,  Thalassia  Jugoslavica  10(1/2):213- 
238. 

Roding,  P.  F  1798  Museum  Boltenianum.  Part  1,  Hamburg, 
156  pp.;  Part  2.  Hamburg,  i-viii  +  199  pp. 

Sabelli,  B.  and  S.  Tommasini.  1987.  Osservazioni  sulla  radula 
e  sulla  protoconca  di  Ocenchra  crinaceus  (L.,1758)  e  Had- 
riana  orctca  (Vokes,  1964),  Bolletino  Malacologico  23(9- 
10):275-283, 

Schumacher,  C,  F,  1817,  Essay  dun  Nouveau  Systeme  des 
Habitations  des  Vers  Testaces,  Copenhagen,  287  pp, 

Sowerby,  G.  B.  1841.  Conchological  Illustrations,  Part 
II. Murex.  A  catalogue  of  recent  species  9  pp.  -I-  Index, 
pp.  1-22. 

Spight,  T.  M.  1972  Patternsof  change  in  adjacent  populations 
of  an  intertidal  snail,  Thais  lamcUosa.  PhD  dissertation, 
Universitv  of  Washington,  Seattle,  Washington,  325  pp. 

Spight,  T.  M.  1976,  Colors  and  patterns  of  an  intertidal  snail, 
Thais  lamellosa.  Researches  on  Population  Ecology  17: 
176-190 

Spight,  T  M,  1982  Population  sizes  of  two  marine  snails  with 
a  changing  food  suppl>  Journal  of  Experimental  Marine 
Biology  and  Ecology  57:195-217, 

Thorson,  G  1941.  Marine  Gastropoda  Prosobranchiata  The 
Zoology  of  Iceland  4(60):  1-150. 

Thorson,  G      1946     Reproduction  and  larval  development  of 

Danish   Marine  Bottom   Invertebrates Meddelelser 

fra  Kommissionen  for  Danmarks  Fiskeri-  og  Havunder- 
sogelser  Serie:  Plankton  4:1-523 

Wenz,  W.  1941.  Prosobranchia.  In:  Handbuch  der  Palao- 
zoologie.  Volume  6.  OH.  Schindewolf,  ed.,  Gebriider 
Borntraeger,  Berlin,  part  5,  pp.  961-1200. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(2):58-62,  1993 


Page  58 


Thala  esperanza,  a  new  Costellariidae  (Mollusca:  Gastropoda)  from 
northern  Puerto  Rico 


Jose  H.  Leal' 
Donald  R.  Moore 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  am! 
Atmospheric  Science 
Uni\ersity  ol  Miami 
4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 
Miami,  Florida  33149-1098  USA 


ABSTRACT 

Thala  esperanza  n  sp.  is  described  from  Piaya  Esperanza, 
municipality  of  Manati,  on  the  northern  coast  of  Puerto  Rico. 
Small  size,  slender  and  delicate  shell,  smaller  spire  angle,  larger 
number  of  spiral  cords,  and  a  distincti\e  constriction  below  the 
suture  separates  the  new  taxon  from  western  Atlantic  conge- 
neric species. 

Key  words:  Thala.  Costellariidae,  Puerto  Rico,  Atlantic  Ocean, 
Caribbean  Sea,  new  species,  systematics. 


INTRODUCTION 

The  costellariid  genus  Thala  H.  &  A.  Adams,  1853  com- 
prises about  12  Recent  species,  of  which  two  are  known 
from  the  western  Atlantic.  Thala  fovcata  (Sowerby,  1834) 
is  known  to  occur  at  St.  Vincent,  Antilles  and  possibK  at 
the  island  of  Sao  Thome  in  the  eastern  Atlantic  (Maes  & 
Raeihle,  1975).  Thala  floridana  (Dall,  1884)  is  found 
along  the  coasts  of  Florida,  northern  Cuba,  the  Gulf  of 
Mexico,  Haiti,  and  the  Yucatan  Peninsula.  Cernohorsky 
(1970)  and  Abbott  (1974)  s\non\  mized  T.  floridana  with 
T.  foveata,  before  Maes  and  Raeihle  (1975)  demonstrat- 
ed that  they  are  separate  species.  These  latter  authors, 
following  preliminary  observations  of  Raeihle  ( 1968),  have 
shown  in  a  detailed  anatomical  study  of  T.  floridana  that 
Thala  belongs  in  the  Costellariidae  (as  V'exillidae),  and 
provided  support  for  the  then  still  controversial  proposal 
that  this  latter  taxon  deserved  full  familial  status  apart 
from  Mitridae  (e.g.,  Azuma,  1965;  Ponder,  1972)  due  to 
differences  in  gross  anatomy  and  early  life  history. 

In  this  work  we  describe  a  third  western  Atlantic  spe- 
cies of  Thala  collected  in  beach  sediments  from  Manati, 


'  Current  address:  Department  of  Invertebrate  Zoology,  NHB 
stop  118,  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian 
Institution,  Washington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


Puerto  Rico.  Soft  parts  and  radula  are  unknown;  none- 
theless, conchological  characters  are  distinctive  enough 
to  justify  the  naming  of  a  new  species. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Shells  were  measured  using  WILD  M-5  and  M-8  dis- 
secting microscopes  with  ocular  micrometers  and  pho- 
tographed with  a  Nikon  F2  camera  with  extension  bel- 
lows and  MicroNikkor  55  mm  objective.  Scanning  electron 
micrographs  were  made  using  an  ISI  Double  Stage  DS- 
130  scanning  electron  microscope  at  the  Electron  Mi- 
croscope Laboratory,  Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and 
Atmospheric  Science.  Model  I  ANOVA  with  unequal 
sample  sizes  (Table  1)  was  performed  according  to  Sokal 
and  Rohlf  (1981).  Acronyms  used  throughout  this  paper 
are:  ANSP,  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia; 
FMNH,  Field  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Chicago; 
MCZ,  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Har\ard  Uni- 
versity, Cambridge;  MNHN,  Museum  National  d'His- 
toire  Naturelle,  Paris;  UF,  Florida  Museum  of  Natural 
History,  University  of  Florida,  Gainesville;  UMML,  In- 
vertebrate Museum,  University  of  Miami  Rosenstiel 
School  of  Marine  and  Atmospheric  Science;  L'SNM,  Na- 
tional Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Insti- 
tution, Washington. 

SYSTEMATICS 

Family  Costellariidae  MacDonald,  1860 
Genus  Thala  H.  &  A.  Adams,  1853 
Thala  esperanza  new  species 
(figures  1-6,  Table  1) 

Description:  Shell  fusiform  (length  width  ~  2.7),  im- 
perforate, reaching  5.0  mm  in  length,  1.9  mm  width. 
Spire  angle  about  27°  Shell  surface  smooth,  translucent, 
golden  brown  to  chestnut  brown,  usually  with  single 
spiral  baiul  of  lighter  color  on  middle  of  last  w  horl.  Peri- 
ostracmn  undetectable.  Protoconcli  usually  decollated  in 
adult  shells,  when  present  transparent  brown,  smooth, 
with  2  whorls,  about  0.4  mm  diameter,  embryonic  whorl 


J.  H.  Leal  and  D.  R.  Moore,  1993 


Page  59 


Table  1.  Linear  shell  measurements  (mm)  and  counts  for  Thala  esperanza  new  species,  holotype  and  paratypes  1,  2,  5-12,  and 
T.  foveata.  Statistics  for  model  I  .\NO\'A  with  unequal  sample  sizes  according  to  Sokal  and  Rohlf  (1981);  NS  =  not  significantly 
different. 


T  c.s/x 

■ranza  (n  = 

11) 

7",  fovea  la  (n  =  6) 

C'haracter 

Range 

.\ 

SD 

Range 

.\ 

SD 

ANOVA 

Total  length 

3.92-500 

440 

0,40 

5-25-6,33 

5,73 

0.40 

F  =  24.14 
p  <  0.001 

Shell  uidth 

1.36-1.88 

1,62 

0,16 

2  04-2  24 

2  15 

0.07 

F  =  23.02 
p  <  0001 

Length  last  whorl 

2.80-3.48 

3,17 

022 

3,72-4,28 

3,97 

0.19 

F  =  56.34 
p  <  0.001 

.\perture  length 

1.92-2,44 

2  18 

0,15 

2,84-3,32 

3,02 

0.20 

F  =  81.54 
p  <  0.001 

.\perture  wiilth 

0.36-0,(50 

0  49 

0  06 

0,64-0,80 

0  71 

0.05 

F  =  65.12 
p  <  0.001 

Teleoconch  whorls 

3,25-5,00 

4,18 

0,45 

4,00-4,75 

4,42 

0.26 

NS 

Spire  angle  (degrees) 

26-29 

26,9 

1  14 

35-37 

36.0 

0.89 

F  =  213.9 
p  <s  0.001 

Spiral  cords  last  u  horl 

23-31 

27.4 

2,20 

16-18 

16,8 

0.75 

F  =  128.4 
p  «:  0.001 

.\\ia\  ribs  last  whorl 

24-32 

28.3 

2,65 

21-27 

23,0 

2.28 

F  =  23.41 
p  <  0.001 

Length   wklth 

2  17-3  05 

2,73 

0  24 

2,47-2,83 

2.65 

0.13 

NS 

.\perture  length   total  Icn 

gth 

044-0,61 

0,50 

0,(.)5 

0  51-0,55 

0,52 

0.02 

NS 

Length  last  uhorl,  total  length 

0,65-0,87 

072 

0,06 

0,66-0,71 

0  69 

0.02 

NS 

,\pertiire  length 'aperturt 

"  width 

3,78-4,58 

4,27 

0  24 

3,55-4,87 

4,26 

0  51 

NS       ■•■ 

tilted,  about  0.3  mm  diameter.  Protoconch/teleoconch 
transition  orthocline.  Teleoconch  reaching  5  convex 
whorls.  Suture  impressed.  Constriction  present  abapi- 
cally  at  suture,  defining  a  spiral  cord  wider  than  re- 
maining spiral  cords.  Combination  of  spiral  and  axial 
elements  producing  clathrate  aspect  to  entire  teleoconch. 
Axial  sculpture  of  24-32  flattened  ribs  on  last  whorl. 
Interspaces  as  w  ide  as  axial  ribs  on  early  w  horls,  '/4  rib 
width  on  last  whorl.  Spiral  sculpture  of  23-31  cordlets 
on  last  whorl.  Cordlets  much  narrower  than  axial  ribs  on 
early  whorls,  equal  in  width  to  axial  ribs  on  last  whorl. 
Five  or  six  adilitional  abapical  spiral  ribs  at  ba.se  slightK 
wider  than  those  on  remainder  of  last  whorl.  Aperture 
elongate  (length/width  ~  4.5).  Outer  lip  with  9-13  small 
but  well  defined  denticles  that  are  absent  in  immature 
shells.  Columella  arched,  with  4  columellar  folds  that 
follow  orientation  of  spiral  cords  along  base.  Parietal 
region  excavated,  thus  columellar  plaits  not  raised  above 
shell  surface  at  base.  Anterior  siphonal  canal  wide,  weak- 
ly defined.  Posterior  siphonal  canal  delineated  only  along 
inner  surface  of  aperture,  without  notch. 

Holotype  :  USNM  860280,  5.00  mm  length.  1.64  mm 
width. 

Type  locality:  Playa  Esperanza,  about  40  km  west  of 
San  Juan,  Municipality  of  Manati.  northern  Puerto  Rico. 

Paratypes:    Paratypes  1-4,  USNM  860281;  Paratypes  5- 


6,  UF  193382-193383;  Paratvpe  7,  ASNP  391938;  Para- 
type  8,  AMNH  232313;  Paratype  9,  MCZ  302588;  Para- 
tvpe 10,  MNHN.  unnumbered;  Paratvpe  11,  FMNH 
223388;  Paratvpe  12,  I'MML  8375;  Paratypes  13-16, 
USNM  860282;  All  from  tvpe  locality,  D.  Piferer  col. 
05/1973.  beach  drift. 

Remarks:  Protoconchs  are  almost  always  decollated  in 
beach-collected  shells  of  this  new  species.  Only  two  of 
17  shells  examined  in  this  study  had  intact  protoconchs, 
and  those  clearly  were  immature  specimens.  We  do  not 
know  whether  protoconch  decollation  occurs  while  snails 
are  still  alive.  Decollation  occurs  frequently  in  unrelated 
gastropods  (e.g.,  Cadiicifer  atlanticus  Coelho,  Matthews 
&  Cardoso,  1970,  a  buccinid  from  off  Brazil,  see  Leal, 
1991:151).  The  protoconch  is  ver\  thin  and  translucent 
in  T.  esperanza.  Decollation  probably  also  occurs  in  T. 
foveata.  In  examining  one  of  the  specimens  illustrated 
by  Maes  and  Raeihle  (1975)  (UF  158165,  St.  Vincent, 
Lesser  Antilles),  we  found  that  the  protoconch  of  that 
specimen,  present  in  Maes  is.  Raeihle  s  illustration,  is  now 
missing  (figures  7,  8). 

Of  the  western  Atlantic  species  of  Thala,  T.  esperanza 
can  be  more  easily  separated  from  T.  floridana.  We  do 
not  provide  statistical  comparisons  between  these  two 
species,  but  such  comparisons  may  be  made  using  data 
in  Table  1  and  in  Maes  and  Raihle  (1975).  Thala  flori- 
dana has  a  much  thicker  and  larger  shell,  with  nearly 


Page  60 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


Figures  1-6.  Thala  esperanza  new  species.  1.  Holotype.  Playa  Esperanza,  N4anati,  Puerto  Rico  (SKM)  2.  Juvenile  shell  of  paratype 
4  (SEM).  3.  Protoconch  of  paratype  4  (SEM).  4.  Paratype  1.  5.  Parietal  region  sfiowing  columellar  plaits  on  holotype  (SEM.  6. 
Shell  sculpture  near  adapical  part  of  aperture  on  holotvpe  (SEM).  .\11  from  type  locality.  Figures  7-9.  Thahi  foveata.  UF  1.58165, 


J.  H.  Leal  and  D.  R.  Moore,  1993 


Page  61 


twice  the  average  width  of  T.  cspcranza.  Shells  of  T. 
floridana  are  usuall\  dark  brow  n.  hut  some  can  be  white 
(Maes  &  Raeihle,  1975)  (figure  1 1 ).  Shells  are  never  white 
in  r.  esperanza.  The  40°  spire  angle  of  T.  floridana  is 
broader  than  that  of  T.  esperanza  (27°).  Thala  floridana 
has  a  much  coarser  sculptural  pattern  (figures  10,  11), 
with  about  13  spiral  cords  and  20  axial  ribs  on  the  last 
whorl.  These  numbers  a\erage  27.4  and  28.3,  respec- 
tively, in  T.  esperanza  (figures  1,  4,  Table  I)  (See  Ap- 
pendix 1  for  a  list  of  specimens  of  Thala  floridana  ex- 
amined). 

The  degree  of  overall  shell  similarit\  between  T.  es- 
peranza and  T.  foveata  is  greater.  Table  1  shows  mea- 
surements, proportions,  and  meristic  counts  for  adult 
shells  of  the  two  species.  All  known  specimens  of  T. 
foveata  are  thicker  and  significaiitK  larger  (Table  1 )  than 
any  shell  in  the  t\pe  series  of  T.  esperanza.  The  base  in 
T.  foveata  is  alw  a)  s  more  tapered.  Thala  esperanza  dif- 
fers in  having  flattened  axial  ribs  with  narrower  inter- 
spaces, significanth  larger  spire  angle,  and  greater  num- 
bers of  spiral  cords  and  axial  ribs  on  last  w  horl.  There  is 
also  a  marked,  distinctive  constriction  defining  a  wider 
spiral  cord  just  below  the  suture  in  the  new  species  (fig- 
ures 1,  4,  7,  8)  (See  .\ppendix  1  for  specimens  of  T. 
foveata  examined). 

Thala  esperanza  can  be  distinguished  from  its  eastern 
and  western  Pacific  congeners  by  its  much  smaller  size 
and  differences  in  shell  shape  and  sculpture.  Thala  gra- 
tiosa  (Reeve,  1845)  from  tropical  west  America  has  a 
somewhat  similar  shell  contour,  but  is  twice  as  large  and 
has  a  much  coarser  sculpture  with  relatively  fewer  ele- 
ments (Keen,  1971;  Sphon,  1969).  The  western  Pacific 
T.  milium  (Reeve,  1845)  and  T.  todilla  (Mighels,  1845) 
also  differ  by  their  larger  size,  coarser  sculpture,  purple 
color  in  the  former  and  four-w  horled  protoconch  in  the 
latter  (Cernohorskv,  1970;  Kav,  1979). 


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  D.  Princz  for  making  a\  ailable  all  specimens 
of  the  type  series.  Loans  of  material  lor  comparison  w  ere 
provided  by  E.G.  Thompson  and  K.  Auffenberg  (UF), 
S.P.  Kool  (MCZ),  G.  Rosenberg  (ANSP),  W.K.  Emerson 
and  WE.  Sage  (AMNH),  and  M.G.  Harasewych  (USNM). 
We  are  also  indebted  to  M.G.  Harasew\ch  and  to  an 
anonymous  reviewer  for  criticisms  that  helped  improve 
the  manuscript.  N.A.  Voss  and  P.L.  Blackwelder  allowed 
for  use  respectively  of  the  facilities  at  the  Invertebrate 
Museum  and  Electron  Microscopy  Laborator\-,  RSMAS, 
University  of  Miami. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

.\bbolt.  R   T     1974     .\iiieric-aii  seashells.  Second  edition   \'an 

Nostrand-Reinhold,  New  York.  66o  p 
.\zunia.  M.     1965.    On  the  raduiae  of  the  faniiK   \  e\illidae. 

\  enus  24:53-.57 
(>rnohorsk\,  \N'.  O     1970.    S\stematics  of  the  families  Mitri- 

dae  and  N'oiutoniitridae  (Moilusca:  Gastropoda).  Bulletin 

of  the  .Auckland  Institute  and  Museum  8:  i-ii  +  1-190. 
Ka\,  E.  \.     1979.     Hawaiian  marine  shells.  Reef  and  shore 

fauna  of  Hawaii    Section  4:  Moilusca.  Bernice  P.  Bishop 

Museum  Special  Publication  64(4),  Honolulu,  653  p. 
Keen.  .\  M     1971     Seasliells  of  tropical  West  .\merica.  Marine 

mollusks  from  Lower  California  to  Colombia.  Stanford 

Universit\'  Press,  Stanford,  626  p. 
Leal,  J.  H.    1991.    Marine  prosoliranch  gastropods  from  oceanic 

islands  off  Brazil:  species  composition  and  biogeography. 

Uni\ersal  Book  Services,  Oegstgeest,  419  p. 
Maes.  \'   O   and  D   Raeihle.     1975.    Systematics  and  biology 

of  Thala  floridana  (Gastropoda:  N'exillidae).  Malacologia 

15(l):43-67. 
Ponder,  W.   F      1972.     The  morpholog)   of  some  mitriform 

gastropods  with  special  reference  to  their  alimentar)  and 

reproductive  systems,  Malacologia  1 1(2):295-342. 
Raeihle.   D      1968      Notes  on   capti\e   Cerithium   variabile 

C.B  .\dams  and  Milra  floridana  Dall    .\muial  Report  of 

the  .\merican  Malacological  L  nion  1968:35-36. 
Sokal,  R.  R.  and  F.  J.  Rohlf.    1981.    Biometry:  the  principles 

and  practice  of  statistics  in  biological  research.  Second 

edition.  W.H.  Freeman,  San  Francisco,  859  p. 
Sphon,  G.  G.    1969.    Notes  on  the  the  Mitridae  of  the  eastern 

Pacific,  2.  The  genus  Thala,  with  the  description  of  a  new 

species.  The  N'eliger  12(11:84-88. 

APPENDIX  1 

Material  of  Thala  foveata  examined,  all  from  Calliaqua, 
St.  \incent.  British  N'irgin  Islands:  LP  158165,  1  shell, 
beach  drift,  H.H.  Monroe,  01  1961,  ex-McGinty  Collec- 
tion; UF  145855,  2  shells,  H.H.  Monroe,  01/1961,  ex- 
McGint\  Collection;  "rockv  co\e  on  windward  side  of 
SE  Point,  Calliaqua  Bav",  13°07'20"\,  6n  1'55"W,  ANSP 
324791,  1  shell,  V.O.  Maes  02  1972;  13°07'04"N, 
61°12'20"W,  ANSP  354555,  2  shells,  H.H.  Monroe  1956, 
Ex-Einlay  Collection. 

Material  of  Thala  floridana  examined:  East  Coast  of 
Florida:  St.  Augustine,  L'F  158167,  3  shells,  Ted  Yocius 
10/1972,  225  ft,  Ex-J.M.  Bijur  Collection;  AMNH  246013, 
2  shells,  Ted  Yocius,  Jerome  M.  Bijur  Collection;  Fort 
Pierce,  AMNH  127640,  16  shells,  Thomas  Hughes  leg.; 
MCZ  298862,  3  shells,  Bernadine  Baker  coll.,  Ex-Doris 
Folsom  5  1976;  Palm  Beach,  Bovnton  Beach,  UF  145856, 
1  shell,  McGinty  8  1944;  UF  1(19469,  41  shells,  McGinty 
Collection,  02/1944;  Bo\nton  Beach,  Ocean  Ridge,  UF 


St.  Vincent,  West  Indies,  7.  Shell  (SEM),  8.  Shell,  M.  Shell  sculpture  near  adapical  part  of  aperture  (SEM),  Figures  10-1  I.  Thala 
floridana    10.  ISNM  S602S4,  Bear  Gut,  Miami,  Florida  (SEM),  1  1.  I'SNM  860283,  off  Miami  Beach,  Florida,  Scale  bars  =  1  mm. 


except  for  Figures  3,  5,  6,  9  =  0,: 


Page  62 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


158164,  1  shell,  T.  McGinty  8/1944;  Card  Sound.  UF 
63207,  2  shells,  M.  Smith  1/1935,  I'liiversity  of  Alabama 
leg.;  UF  13150,  1  shell,  C.B.  Lungren  1909;  1.6  km  off 
Miami  Beach,  USNM  860283,  1  shell,  M.  Almasi  and  D. 
Marszalek  10/1978,  24  m  depth;  Bear  Cut,  Miami,  USNM 
860284,  A.  Emery  02/1956,  beach  drift;  Bird  Key,  Bis- 
cayne  Bay,  INSM  414387,  3  shells,  Eolis  Sta.  13,  2-10 
ft.,  Henderson  Coll.  1910;  Florida  Keys:  Key  Largo, 
AMNH  242626,  4  shells,  ex-Alice  Denison  Barlow  Col- 
lection; Little  Molasses  Reef,  off  Kev  Largo,  UF145851, 
McGintv  4/3/1950;  Bonefish  Key,  UF  192101,  4  shells, 
Beal-Maltbie  coll.,  Ex-McGintv  Collection;  UF  146530, 
1  shell,  McGinty  Collection;  UF  63202,  8  shells,  M.  Smith 
coll..  University  of  Alabama  leg.;  UF  162451,  3  shells, 
Blenn  R.  Bales,  G.L.  Warmke  leg.  1989;  UF  135603,  3 
shells,  V.  Orr,  H.G.  Lee  leg.;  MCZ  118844,  10-H  shells, 
B.R.  Bales  5/7/1940;  MCZ  100714,  8  shells,  B.R.  Bales 
leg.;  AMNH  116412,  2  shells,  1940,  Dr.  and  Mrs.  Julius 
Wisoff  Collection;  AMNH  114121,  1  shell,  T.  McGinty 
coll.;  AMNH  138995A,  1  shell,  AS.  Koto  leg.;  AMNH 
189020,  4  shells,  AS.  Koto  leg.  1949,  J.  M.  Gate  Collection; 
AMNH  138995,  4  shells,  A.S.  Koto  leg.,  M.K.  Jacobson 
Collection;  AMNH  199169,  9  shells,  AS.  Koto  leg.;  Lower 
Matecumbe  Kev,  USNM  53477,  3  shells,  H.  Hemphill, 
in  grass;  Kev  Vaca,  UF  156266,  9  shells,  McGinty  2/1939; 
MCZ  153269,  25+  shells,  B.R.  Bales;  Key  Vaca,  Boot 
Key  Harbor,  UF  145853,  7  shells,  McGinty  coll.  3/1945; 
MCZ  226804,  2  shells,  grassy  bottom,  1  fm.  McGinty 
coll.;  No  Name  Key,  UF  63203,  2  shells.  University  of 
Alabama  leg.;  Little  Torch  Key,  UF  123072,  33  shells, 
M.C.  Teskey  1968-1977,  on  sand  patches;  Grassy  Key 
(Florida  Bay),  MCZ  110198,  4  shells,  under  rocks,  P. 
McGinty  leg.;  Pumpkin  Key,  UF  63205,  2  shells.  M 
Smith  1/1935,  University  of  Alabama  leg.;  Islamorada. 
AMNH  121444,  3  shells,  ex-E.C.  Styles;  Big  Pine  Key, 
UF  63204,  4  shells,  M.  Smith  coll..  University  of  Alabama 
leg.;  Key  West,  AMNH  8982,  3  shells.  Constable,  Jay 
Collection;  USNM  53541,  1  shell,  H.  Hemphill,  on  rocks; 
Barraconta  Key,  9  miles  W  of  Key  West,  UF  13149,  2 
shells,  G.W.  Van  Hyning,  6/11/1958;  Middle  Sambo 
Shoals,  UF  145852,  6  shells,  McGinty  6/1946;  Dry  Tor- 
tugas:  MCZ  258469,  1  shell,  J.S.  Schwengel,  dredged; 
Loggerhead  Key,  UF  158168,  1  shell,  T.  McGinty  8/1941, 
0.5  fm;  Garden  Key,  South  Coaling  Dock,  UF  13151,  2 
shells,  G.W.   Van  Hyning  7/16/1938,  on  piling;  Gulf 


Coast  of  Florida:  St.  Martins  Reef,  near  Aripeka  Bird 
Racks,  6  mi.  W  of  Aripeka,  Pasco-Hernando  Counts  line, 
MC;Z  233672,  14  shells,  W.A.  Smith  5/25/1963;  Ozone, 
Crystal  Beach,  AMNH  246038,  3  shells,  Dan  Steger  coll., 
Jerome  Bijur  Collection;  AMNH  125612,  10  shells,  S. 
Levine  leg.  1960;  AMNH  189024,  5  shells,  S.  Levine  leg. 
i960,  J.M.  Gate  Collection;  AMNH  125928.  76  shells,  S. 
Levine  leg.  1960;  AMNH  194560,  66  shells,  Gordon  New- 
ell-Usticke  Collection;  Ozone,  Crystal  Beach,  St.  Joseph 
Sound,  UF  193036,  27  shells,  Dan  Steger;  UF  137573,  5 
shells,  D.  Steger  1970.  H.G.  Lee  leg.;  AMNH  189023,  3 
shells,  mud  and  grass  bottom,  E.  Marcott  leg.  1963,  J. 
Gate  Collection;  Marco,  UF  137649, 1  shell,  H.  Hemphill, 
2  fms,  H.G.  Lee  leg.;  USNM  53542,  1  shell,  H.  Hemphill; 
15-35  mi.  off  Ft.  Walton  (FL),  MCZ  145877,  5  shells, 
13-19  fms.,  LA.  Burry;  Featherbend  Bank,  UF  63206, 
2  shells,  M.  Smith  1/1935.  University  of  Alabama  leg; 
Okaloosa  County,  off  Destin,  UF  158166,  1  shell,  UF 
145857.  2  shells,  McGinty  10/1941,  14  fms;  Bahamas: 
Andros.  first  island  off  Mintie  Bar,  SE  end  of  South  Bight, 
USNM  271832,  7  shells,  P.  Bartsch;  Abaco,  Little  Harbor, 
USNM  180492,  5  shells,  O.  Bryant;  Grand  Bahama  Is- 
land: Dead  Man's  Reef,  26°34'45"N,  78°51'45"W,  ANSP 
371266,  1  shell.  J.  Worsfold,  Ex-J.  Worsfold;  McLean's 
Town.  26°38'45"N,77°57'30"W.  ANSP  369060.  8  shells. 
J.  Worsfold,  E.\-J.  Worsfold;  Eight  Mile  Rock,  Hepburn 
Town,  "Garbage  Hole",  26°31'30"N,  78°47'15"W,  ANSP 
370392.  4  shells,  J.  Worsfold,  Ex-J.  Worsfold;  Wood  Cay, 
26°44'15"N,  79°5S'15"W,  ANSP  369615,  3  shells.  J.  Wors- 
fold, Ex-J.  Worsfold;  West  End,  Settlement  Point, 
26°42'  15"N,  78°59'50" W,  ANSP  368626,  6  shells,  J.  Wors- 
fold, Ex-J.  Worsfold;  West  End,  Hotel  Jettv,  26°42'15"N, 
078°59'50"W,  ANSP  368711.  21  shells,  J.  Worsfold,  Ex- 
J.  Worsfold;  Nassau,  New  Providence  Island,  L'F  145849, 

1  shell,  McGinty  6/6/1947,  4-6  fms,  Sta.  17;  Cuba:  Las 
Villas,  Caibarien,  Cayo  Salinas,  AMNH  138924,  1  shell, 
M.K.  Jacobson  leg.,  07/1947;  Esperanza  (NW  Cuba), 
USNM  414396.  5+  shells,  Barrera  Expedition,  Sta.  210, 
2-3  fms;  Santa  Rosa  (NW  Cuba),  USNM  414498,  1  shell, 
Barrera  Expedition,  Sta.  209,  3-6  fms;  Bermuda.  AMNH 
45068,  2  shells.  Constable.  Jav  Collection;  MCZ  24174, 

2  shells,  O.  Brvant  1903;  IISNM  223283,  6 shells,  Havcock 
coll.;  Haiti,  Dept.  de  lOuest,  Saltrois,  USNM  439975,  1 
shell,  Orcutt,  Chamberlain  Coll. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(2);63-75,  1993 


Page  63 


Shell  and  Pallet  Morphology  of  Early  Developmental  Stages  of 
Bankia  goiildi  (Bartsch,  1908)  (Bivalvia:  Teredinidae) 


Antonieto  S.  Tan 

Ya-ping  Hu 

Michael  Castagna' 

Richard  A.  Luiz 

Michael  J.  Kennish 

Alan  S.  Pooley 

Rutgers  University 

Institute  of  Marine  and  Coastal 

Sciences 

P.O.  Box  231 

New  Brunswick,  NJ  0S9U3-0231  USA 


'  Virginia  Institute  of  Marine  and 
Coastal  Sciences 
College  of  William  and  Mary 
Wachapreague,  VA  23480  USA 


ABSTRACT 

The  margin  of  the  lar\al  shell  ot  Bankia  gouldi  (Bartsch)  un- 
dergoes a  progressive  change  m  shape  during  ontogen\  from 
an  initial  D-shape,  to  nearly  circular,  and  then  to  elliptical  just 
prior  to  metamorphosis.  The  length  of  the  iiinge  is  37.9  ±  2  3 
lim,  n  =  30  (range;  34.0-43.0  iim).  The  D-stage  larval  shell  is 
inequilateral  with  the  anterior  end  broader  than  the  posterior 
end.  The  provinculum,  composed  of  two  cardinal  teeth  and 
three  sockets  in  the  left  valve,  and  three  cardinal  teeth  and  two 
sockets  in  the  right  valve,  is  well  developed  in  shells  as  small 
as  75  nm.  The  length  of  the  central  tooth  in  the  right  valve 
ranges  from  12  to  IQ/iim,  The  other  teeth  are  one-half  to  one- 
third  of  the  length  of  the  central  tooth.  A  lateral  hinge  s\  stem, 
consisting  of  two  lateral  flanges  on  the  left  valve  that  interlock 
with  two  lateral  grooves  on  the  right  valve,  is  present  in  spec- 
imens as  small  as  75  nm.  This  hinge  system  persists  until  meta- 
morphosis. Metamorphosis,  first  seen  in  the  development  of  a 
ligament  pit,  occurred  in  larvae  with  shells  as  small  as  197  ^m 
in  height;  and  leads  to  the  development  of  the  chondrophore, 
apophysis,  anterior  and  posterior  slopes,  disc,  umbonal-ventral 
ridge,  dorsal  cond\  le,  ventral  cond)  le,  denticulated  ridges  and 
pallets.  As\nimetrical  growth  results  in  the  formation  of  the 
characteristic  form  of  the  teredinid  postlar\  al  shell  with  a  neu 
axis  of  articulation  oriented  dorsoventrally  along  the  condyles. 
Each  pallet  consists  of  a  proximal  stalk  and  a  distal  blade  witli 
one  to  several  segments.  Pallets  with  one  segment  were  first 
observed  in  early  postlarval  shells  at  0  4  nmi  in  length. 

Key  iL'ords:  larvae,  postlarvae,  shell  morphology,  Teridinidae, 
metamorphosis. 


INTRODUCTION 

Morphological  classification  schemes  used  in  the  iden- 
tification of  bivalve  larval  stages  have  been  developed 
from  light  microscopic  examination  of  plankton  (j0r- 
gensen,  1946;  Rees,  1950)  or  cultured  larvae  (Loosanoff 
et  al.,  1966;  Chanley  &  Andrews,  1971),  More  recently. 


the  scanning  electron  microscope  (SEM)  has  enabled 
workers  to  describe  in  detail  the  hinge  and  other  minute 
structures  of  bivalve  larvae  and  postlarvae  that  are  useful 
in  species  identification  (Turner  &  Boyle,  1975;  Carriker 
&  Palmer,  1979;  Chanley  &  Dinamani,  1980;  Le  Pennec, 
1980;  Lutz  et  al.,  1982a,  b;  Lutz,  1985;  Prezant,  1990; 
Waller,  1991).  A  method  of  consistently  orienting  and 
documenting  the  shapes  and  dimensions  of  larval  shells 
(Lutz  et  al.,  1982b;  Fuller  et  al.,  1989b)  has  provided 
an  additional  means  of  differentiating  bivalve  species. 
The  present  manuscript  is  part  of  an  ongoing  effort  to 
document  the  gross  morphology,  hinge  apparatus  and 
other  morphometric  features  of  larval  and  early  postlar- 
val shells  of  bivalve  mollusks  to  facilitate  ta.xonomic  iden- 
tification of  individual  specimens  to  the  species  level 
(Fuller  &  Lutz,  1989a;  Fuller  et  al.,  1989c;  Kennedy  et 
al..  1991;  Goodsell  et  al.,  1992;  Gustafson  &  Lutz,  1992). 
Bankia  gouldi  (Bartsch,  1908)  is  an  oviparous  mollus- 
can  woodborer  foiuid  in  tropical  and  temperate  waters 
of  the  western  Atlantic  Ocean  (Turner,  1971).  As  an 
adult,  B.  gouldi  has  a  soft,  vermiform  body,  a  diminutive 
shell  that  covers  the  anterior-most  portion  of  the  body, 
and  segmented  pallets  situated  at  the  base  of  the  siphons 
beneath  a  muscular  collar  (Turner,  1966,  1971).  The 
pallets  are  not  formed  until  after  metamorphosis  and, 
therefore,  are  of  no  value  in  identification  of  larval  shells. 
In  addition,  previous  descriptions  of  the  larval  shell,  early 
postlarval  shell  and  pallet  of  B.  gouldi  are  insufficient  to 
allow  congeneric  differentiation.  Hence,  a  means  of  iden- 
tifying younger  specimens  of  B.  gouldi  is  clearly  needed. 
This  work  presents  both  qualitative  and  quantitative  data 
on  the  morphology  of  the  larval  shell,  early  postlarval 
shell  and  pallet  of  6.  gouldi  that  can  aid  in  species  iden- 
tification of  early  ontogenetic  stages.  In  particular,  we 
show  that  the  following  features  are  important  in  distin- 
guishing the  larvae  of  B.  gouldi  from  T.  navalis:  slope 
of  the  shoulders,  length  of  provinculum/hinge-line,  and 
length  of  posterior  tooth  ot  the  left  provinculum. 


Page  64 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


Figure  I.  Inl.rnal  surface  vie-w  of  disart.culaU-cl  larval  sheik  Antcru.r  end  of  the  left  valve  is  oriented  tc»vards  Uie  ■^''^^^-h';^; 
the  anter.or  ernl  of  the  nght  valve  .s  or.enled  towards  the  left.  The  runnber  above  each  valve  s.gn.tes  the  maximum  Imear  shell 
dimension  in  ^in 


Tan  et  al..  1993 


Page  65 


3 

X 

o 


X 
CO 


240 


SHELL  LENGTH  (fim) 

Fif»iir«-  2.  Linear  regression  oi  shell  height  plotted  ;i>;aiiist  shell 
length  ol  larvae. 


Table  I .   Dimensions  in  fim  of  the  larval  shell  of  Bankia  gouldi 
shown  in  Figures  1  and  2    1  SD  =  one  standard  deviation 


Sam- 

ple 

Range 

Mean  ±  1  SD 

size 

Left  Valve 

Anterior  tooth  length 

7.5-9.4 

8.3  ±  0.8 

7 

Posterior  tooth  length 

5.5-7.1 

6.4  ±  0.6 

7 

Provincular  length 

36.0-40.5 

38.1  ±  1.8 

9 

Right  Valve 

Anterior  tooth  length 

3.9-4.9 

4.5  ±  0.4 

8 

Central  tooth  length 

12.5-15.5 

14.5  ±  1.2 

7 

Posterior  tooth  length 

4.5-5.9 

5.0  ±  0.5 

9 

Provincular  length 

34.0-40.5 

37.8  ±  1-9 

9 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Specimens  of  Bankia  gouldi  were  collected  from  wooden 
frames  of  trays  set  out  for  a  year  in  the  York  River  at 
Gloucester  Point,  VA  by  Dr.  Mary  Gibbons.  Adults  were 
mass  spawned,  and  the  fertilized  eggs  w  ere  grown  to  the 
early  adult  stage  using  standard  techniques  (Loosanoff 
&  Davis,  1963;  Castagna  &  Kraeuter,  1984).  The  tem- 
perature of  the  culture  water  ranged  from  22  to  30°C, 
and  salinity,  from  32  to  34  ppt  salinity.  Floating  blocks 
of  wood  were  provided  as  substrata  for  metamorphosing 
larvae.  Larvae  and  postlarvae  were  sampled  regularly 
and  preserved  in  95%  ethanoi.  The  preparation  of  spec- 
imens for  SEM  examination  was  described  previously  by 
Fuller  et  al.  (1989b).  The  specimens  were  coated  with 
about  600  A  gold-palladium  using  a  Polaron  Coating  L'nit 
E5100,  and  they  were  examined  using  a  Hitachi-450 
SEM.  Calibration  of  orthogonality  of  the  SEM  was  done 
with  the  aid  of  metallic  spheres  or  glass  microspheres. 
Dimensions  in  the  SEM  were  calibrated  using  a  cali- 
brated ocular  micrometer,  a  glass  microsphere,  or  a  grid 
of  known  dimension.  Specimens  were  prepared,  consis- 
tently oriented,  and  photographed  as  previously  de- 
scribed to  facilitate  comparison  of  shapes  and  measure- 
ments (Lutz  et  al.,  1982b;  Fuller  et  al,  1989b,  c).  Shell 
terminology  is  described  in  Rees  (1950),  Turner  (1966), 
Chaniey  and  Dinamani  (1980),  and  Fuller  et  al.,  (1989c). 

The  maximum  linear  dimension,  shell  length,  shell 
height,  provincular  length,  tooth  length  and  the  lateral 
hinge  length  were  measured  from  caiibarated  scanning 
electron  micrographs  of  oriented  shells.  The  shell  height 
and  length  of  the  shell,  hinge  line  and  pallet  were  also 
measured  using  a  compound  microscope  with  the  same 
calibrated  ocular  micrometer  used  to  calibrate  the  scale 
of  the  SEM.  These  terms  are  defined  in  Fuller  et  al. 
(1989c). 

Whenever  possible,  we  compared  our  results  quanti- 
tatively with  previously  published  data.  Variables  that 
changed  with  growth  were  compared  using  analysis  of 
covariance,  whereas  variables  that  were  independent  of 
size  were  compared  using  the  Student  t-test,  Tukey,  or 
Student-Neuman-Keuls  multiple  range  test  (Zar,  1984). 


The  larval  shells  in  Figures  1  and  3  are  referred  to  by 
their  maximum  linear  shell  dimension,  which  is  the 
greatest  distance  between  two  points  on  a  contour  of  a 
valve  oriented  in  a  standard  fashion  as  described  pre- 
viously. The  early  postlarval  shells  in  Figures  5-7  are 
referred  to  by  their  shell  height.  Numbers  separated  by 
a  slash  (e.g.  57/62)  indicate  left  and  right  valve  dimen- 
sions respectively. 

RESULTS 

Larval  shell:  One  da>  after  fertilization  the  shell  length 
was  61.1  ±  4.5  Mill,  n  =  30  (range:  54-70  /um);  shell 
height  was  49.3  ±  4.5  ^ni,  n  =  30  (range:  43-59  ^m); 
hinge  line/provincular  length  was  37.9  ±  2.3  fim,  n  = 
30  (range:  34.0-43.0  fxm).  Most  valves  of  the  straight- 
hinge  larvae  are  inequilateral  with  the  anterior  end 
broader  and  protruding  farther  beyond  the  hinge  line 
than  the  posterior  end  (Fig.  1,  57/62). 

The  lar\al  shell  undergoes  gradual  allometric  changes 
during  ontogeny  from  a  D-shape,  to  a  nearly  circular 
shape,  and  finally  to  an  elliptical  shape  just  prior  to  meta- 
morphosis (Fig.  1).  During  larval  growth  the  maximum 
shell  dimension  shifts  from  an  anteroposterior  to  a  dor- 
soventral  axis.  Larval  shells  are  almost  ecjuidimensional 
(length  =  height)  at  approximately  143  ;um  (Figs.  1,  2). 

The  relationship  between  the  length  and  height  of  the 
larval  shell  is  described  by  the  equation,  Y  =  —29  92  + 
1.26X  (r^  =  0.97,  n  =  150),  where  Y  =  height  and  X  = 
length  in  ^m  (Fig.  2).  A  second  power  polynomial  equa- 
tion (quadratic  equation)  fits  the  data  points  only  slightly 
better  than  the  linear  regression  equation. 

The  provinculuin  consists  of  two  cardinal  teeth  and 
three  sockets  on  the  left  valve  that  interlock  with  three 
cardinal  teeth  and  two  sockets  on  the  right  valve  (Figs. 
1,  3).  The  onset  of  provincular  development  is  variable, 
occurring  at  about  57  ^.m.  An  individual  at  57  /um  can 
be  in  the  prodissoconch  I  stage  without  any  trace  of  a 
provinculum,  or  in  the  early  prodissoconch  II  stage  with 
a  developing  provinculum  (Fig.  3,  57  ^ni).  Development 
of  the  provincular  teeth  in  the  right  valve  starts  with  the 
formation  ol  the  posterior  tooth,  followed  by  formation 


Page  66 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


Figure  3.  Scanning  electron  micrographs  showing  hinges  of  lar\'ai  shells  seen  in  Figure  1. 


Tan  et  al..  1993 


Page  67 


Figure  i.  Dursomedial  \  ieu  of  the  larval  ihflls.  Orientation  as  in  Figure  1.  The  lateral  hinge  system  consists  of  two  lateral  flanges 
on  the  left  valve  and  two  lateral  grooves  on  the  right  valve  on  each  end  of  the  provinculum.  Horizontal  valve  width:  left  =  198 
nm,  right  =  185  ^m. 


of  the  anterior  tooth,  and  cuhninating  with  the  formation 
of  the  central  tooth  (Fig.  3,  62  urn,  75  ^m).  The  prov- 
inculum is  well-developed  in  valves  measuring  75  nm. 

The  longest  provincuiar  tooth  is  the  centra!  one,  \\  hich 
can  reach  19  nm.  The  other  teeth  are  either  one-half  or 
one-third  of  the  length  of  the  central  tooth  (Table  1). 
The  left  anterior  tooth  is  consistentlv  larger  than  the  left 
posterior  tooth,  but  the  right  anterior  and  right  posterior 
teeth  are  not  consistent!)  different  in  size  (Figs  1,  3).  The 
increase  in  tooth  length  relative  to  shell  length  is  variable: 
the  total  provinculum  increases  more  sIovnIv  on  the  right 
valve  than  on  the  left  valve.  Oni\  the  length  of  the  left 
anterior  tooth  regressed  against  shell  length  during  grow  th 
was  significant  (r-  =  0.57,  Table  2),  others  were  not.  The 
provincuiar  length  measured  from  scanning  electron  mi- 
crographs agrees  with  the  hinge-line  length  values  of 
articulated  valves  measured  bv  a  light  microscope. 

Lateral  flanges  and  grooves  are  present  in  valves  as 
small  as  75  ^m  (Figs.  1,  3),  and  persist  until  metamor- 
phosis. Two  lateral  flanges  on  the  left  valve  (Fig.  1,  81- 
214  ^m.  Fig.  4)  interlock  with  the  two  lateral  grooves 
on  the  right  valve  (Fig.  1,  75-201  ^m.  Fig.  4).  Each 
lateral  flange  or  lateral  groove  extends  from  the  ends  of 
the  provinculum  for  about  1/10-1/15  of  the  perimeter 
along  the  dorsal  commissure  of  the  larval  shell  (Figs.  1, 
4).  The  length  of  the  anterior  and  posterior  lateral  grooves 
are  equal  in  shells  up  to  109  nm  (F"ig.  1),  but  in  larger 
valves  the  anterior  lateral  groove  increases  in  size  reach- 
ing a  length  up  to  12%  greater  than  that  of  the  posterior 
lateral  groove  (Figs.  1,4). 

Early  postlarval  shell:  The  first  morphological  evidence 
of  metamorphosis  is  the  development  of  a  ligament  pit 


beneath  the  posterior  tooth  and  socket  in  valves  mea- 
suring 235/230  jum  in  height  (Figs.  5,  6).  After  meta- 
morphosis, the  growth  of  the  postlarval  shell  is  very  asym- 
metrical (Pigs.  5,  7,  8).  The  postlarval  shell  is  slightly 
inequivalve,  with  the  right  valve  longer  than  the  left 
valve  (Fig.  8).  The  ventral  margin  of  the  right  valve  is 
narrower  than  that  of  the  left  valve.  The  denticles  on 
the  denticulated  ridge  are  predominantly  two  pronged, 
with  the  dorsal  prong  larger  than  tiie  \ entral  prong.  The 
ventral  margin  grov\'s  faster  medially  than  the  anterior 
shell  margin,  while  the  growth  of  the  posterior  margin 
lags  behind  (Figs.  5,  7,  8).  The  length  to  height  ratio  of 


Table  2.  Linear  regressions  of  the  shell  height,  tooth  length 
or  pro\incular  length  plotted  against  shell  length  of  Banhia 
gouldi  shown  in  Figure  1.  a  =  intercept,  b  =  slope, 
r-  =  coefficient  of  determination,  P  =  probabilitv  of  the  re- 
gression coefficient  (slope)  of  each  regression,  N  =  sample  size. 


Dependent 

Variable 

a 

b 

r- 

P 

N 

Left  Valve 

Shell  height 

-31.42 

1.27 

0.98 

<0.01 

9 

.\nterior  tooth 

5.88 

0  02 

0.57 

0  05 

7 

Posterior  tooth 

6.66 

-0.002 

0.02 

0.76 

7 

Provinculum 

37.32 

0.01 

0.03 

0  65 

9 

Right  Valve 

Shell  height 

-27.57 

1.22 

0.98 

<0.01 

9 

Anterior  tooth 

4.89 

-0.003 

0.14 

0.35 

8 

Central  tooth 

12.71 

0.01 

0.18 

0.35 

/ 

Posterior  tooth 

5.36 

-0.003 

0.09 

0.43 

9 

Provinculum 

42,13 

-0  04 

0.71 

<0.01 

9 

Page  68 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


Figure  5.  Internal  .siirfac-  view  ol  early  posllarval  shells.  Orientation  as  ni  Figure  I.  The  number  above  eaeh  valve  signifies  the 
shell  height  measured  in  nm  roughlv  perpendieular  to  the  hinge  region.  The  number  on  the  lower  left  of  the  valve  is  the  she^l 
length  in  fim  measured  roughly  parallel  to  the  hinge  region.  ,'\  =  apophysis.  UC:  =  dorsal  eondyle,  VC  =  ventral  condvie,  R  - 
nmbonal-ventral  ridge. 


Tan  et  al.,  1993 


Page  69 


Figure  6.  Scanning  electron  micrographs  of  the  hinge  region  of  earl\  postlarval  shells  seen  in  Figure  5.  The  number  above  each 
valve  signifies  shell  height  in  ^m,  LP  =  ligament  pit,  C  =  chontlrophore. 


Page  70 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


Figure  7.  Scanniiif;  i'l«lroii  iiiicrograplis  ot  l\w  cxU-riial  surface  (il  t-arl\  pusllarval  shells,  OrieiilatHni  and  number  representation 
a.s  in  I'^igure  5.  AS  =  anterior  slope,  FS  =  Posterior  slope. 


Tan  et  al,  1993 


Page  71 


Figure  8.  Views  from  different  directions  of  partially  articulated  early  postlarval  sfiells  with  two  denticulated  ridges.  The  anterior 
(top  left)  and  the  posterior  (top  right)  views  show  that  the  right  valve  (R)  is  slightly  longer  than  the  left  valve.  The  ventral  view 
at  the  bottom  shows  that  the  ventral  margin  of  the  right  valve  is  narrower  than  that  of  the  left  valve.  Most  teeth  have  two  prongs. 
The  dorsal  prong  of  the  tooth  is  larger  than  the  ventral  prong.  Horizontal  valve  widths  are  as  follows  top  left  valve  =  235  ixm.  top 
right  valve  =  243  nm,  bottom  left  valve  =  225  m"'.  bottom  right  valve  =  239  ^m. 


the  postlarval  shell  continues  to  decrease  with  growth 
(Figs.  9). 

The  chondrophore  that  forms  at  the  base  of  the  pos- 
terior tooth  and  socket  grows  anteroventrally  then  me- 
chally,  assuming  a  recurved  formation  (Figs.  5,  6).  A 
saber-like  apophysis  develops  beneath  the  anterior  tooth 
and  socket,  and  elongates  along  the  sagittal  plane  in  a 
posteroventral  direction  (Figs.  5.  6  height  255/235  Mm) 
The  dorsal  portion  of  the  posterior  slope  and  the  anterior 
slope  are  reflected  up  and  outward  (Figs.  5,  G,  height 
305-1140/290-1140  Mm).  The  base  of  the  apophysis  and 
the  adjacent  reflected  part  of  the  anterior  slope  and  umbo 
are  incorporated  to  form  the  dorsal  condyle  (Figs.  5,  6, 
height  305-1140/290-1 140Mm).  The  enlarged  chondro- 


phore and  dorsal  condyle  eventually  conceal  the  pro- 
vinculum.  As  growth  proceeds,  the  ventral  portion  of  the 
disc  and  the  anterior  slope  curves  ventromedially  (Figs. 
5,  7,  8).  The  shell  thickening  at  the  medial  side  of  the 
ventral  margin  eventually  develops  into  the  ventral  con- 
d\le  (Fig.  5,  height  255/235Mm).  An  umbonal-ventral 
ridge,  e.xtending  froin  the  larval  shell  to  the  ventral  con- 
dyle, forms  on  the  inner  shell  surface  (Fig.  5,  height  335- 
11 40/705- 11 40Mm).  The  umbonal-ventral  ridge  is  visible 
as  an  umbonal-ventral  sulcus  on  the  external  shell  surface 
(Fig.  7,  415-970/355-1075  Mm).  The  posterior  slope  (au- 
ricle) overlaps  the  disc  forming  the  shelf.  The  asym- 
metrical growth  of  the  shell  eventually  results  in  the 
formation  of  the  characteristic  form  of  the  teredinid 


Page  7S 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


B 
J. 

X 

o 

Ed 

a 

to 


2.5 


2.0 


1.5 


1.0 


0.5 


0.0 


30  r 


Y  =  0.15  +  1.00  •  X 
r2  =  0.84.  n  =  41 


0.0  0.5  1.0  1.5  2.0 

SHELL  LENGTH  (mm) 

Figure  9.  Rflation.sliip  between  sliell  length  and  .shell  height 
of  early  postlarval  shells. 


w 
o 

Q 
K 

El, 

o 

K 
Cd 

m 

S 

D 


SHELL  LENGTH  (mm) 

Figure  10.  Relationship  between  shell  length  and  number  of 
denticulated  ridges  on  the  exterior  surface  of  early  postlarval 
shells. 


postlarva,  with  the  a.\is  of  articulation  changing  from  an 
anteroposterior  to  a  dorsoventral  orientation  along  the 
condyles. 

Early  in  the  formation  of  the  postlarval  shell,  dentic- 
ulated ridges  are  added  onto  the  anterior  margin  of  the 
shell,  initially  only  on  the  anterior  area  of  the  anterior 
slope  (Fig.  7,  height  250-280/240-250  urn).  As  the  shell 
grows  larger,  the  denticulated  ridges  extend  to  the  an- 
terior median  area  of  the  anterior  slope.  The  number  of 
denticulated  ridges  increases  significantly  with  the  in- 
crease in  shell  length;  regression  equation,  Y  =  5.38  + 
10.7X,  (r-  =  0.54,  n  =  41),  where  Y  =  number  of  ridges 
and  X  =  shell  length  in  millimeters  (Fig.  10). 

Pallet:  A  one  segment  pallet  was  present  at  a  shell  length 
of  0.4  mm;  at  a  shell  length  of  1.2-1.3  mm,  the  pallet 
had  13  segments.  The  pallet  consists  of  a  proximal  stalk 
and  a  distal  blade  with  one  to  several  segments  (Fig.  11), 
with  the  basal  pallet  segment  being  the  largest.  The  angle 
formed  by  the  base  of  the  blade  and  the  stalk  is  larger 
on  the  dorsal  than  the  ventral  side.  The  medial  inner 
wall  of  the  blade  is  flat,  while  the  shorter  outer  wall  of 
the  blade  is  convex.  The  plane  circumscribed  by  the  distal 
outer  margin  of  the  blade  is  tilted  anteriorly  such  that 


the  distal  border  of  the  inner  margin  extends  further 
posteriorly.  Each  pallet  appears  hemispherical  uhen 
viewed  from  the  distal  end.  The  left  and  right  pallets  in 
an  individual  are  morphologically  similar  and  have  the 
same  number  of  segments  (Fig.  11,  height  250-505  jum), 
v\  hereas  pallets  with  the  same  number  of  segments  from 
different  individuals  can  vary  in  form  (Fig.  11,  height 
840-1415  Mm). 

DISCUSSION 

Larval  shell:  Teredo  navalis  Linnaeus,  1758  is  the  only 
other  teredinid  species  whose  larval  and  postlarval  shell 
morphology  has  been  oriented  and  photographed  in  a 
consistent  manner  (Fuller  et  al..  1989c).  In  lar\al  shells 
of  similar  size,  the  shoulders  of  T.  navalis  (Fig.  1,  Fuller 
et  al.,  1989c)  are  considerably  steeper  (less  rounded)  than 
those  of  Bankia  gouldi  (Fig.  1).  The  shoulders  refer  to 
the  dorsal  shell  margin  on  the  anterior  and  posterior  ends 
of  the  hinge  (C'hanley  &  Dinamani,  1980).  This  differ- 
ence in  larval  shell  shape  can  be  used  to  distinguish  the 
two  species.  On  the  other  hand,  the  size  of  the  specimens 
at  which  the  length  approximates  the  height  measure- 


Table  3.  Linear  regression  equations  for  the  shell  length  and  shell  height  of  D-stage  to  recent  postmetamorphic  larvae,  r-  =  coefficient 
of  determination,  P  =  probability  for  the  slope  of  each  regression,  N  =  sample  size.  Slopes  with  different  superscripts  are  significantly 
different  (P  <  0.0.5)  by  a  Tuke\  multiple  range  test 


Species 

Intercept 

Slope 

r- 

P 

N 

.\uthor 

Teredo  natxilis' 

-49.03 

1.40'^ 

0.99 

<0.01 

10 

Fuller  ('/  al. 
(I9S9c) 

Bankia  sctacea 

-22.50 

1  14" 

LOO 

<0.01 

8 

Turner  &  Johnson 

(1971) 

liankiu  f^onldi 

-.38.72 

L.34^ 

1.00 

<0.0J 

6 

Culliney  (1975) 

liankia  gouldi 

-36.13 

1.37^ 

0.99 

<0.01 

7 

Mann  &  Gallager 

(1985) 

Rankia  gouldi' 

-.32.. 56 

1.28^ 

0.98 

<0.01 

10 

This  stud\- 

Data  used  to  calculate  the  linear  regression  equations  are  derived  measurements  of  the  left  \  alve  of  scaiuiing  electron  micrographs. 
Analysis  of  covariance  of  the  slopes  is  significant  (F-statistic  =  6.32,  P  <  0.001). 


Tan  et  al.,  1993 


Page  73 


Figure  1 1.  Outer  surface  view  of  the  pallets.  The  pallet  length  is  the  distance  between  the  proximal  (stalk)  and  distal  end  (hiade). 
Numbers  signify  the  average  length  of  the  left  and  right  (H)  pallets.  Dorsal  side  of  the  pallet  is  oriented  towards  the  top,  I  =  inner 
wall,  O  =  outer  margin  of  outer  wall. 


Page  74 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


nients  can  not  bo  used  to  differentiate  B.  gaiildi  from  T. 
nat^alis.  The  length  and  height  of  the  larva!  shell  of  B. 
goiildi  are  nearly  equal  at  about  143  ^im,  far  beyond  the 
point  where  the  umbo  is  first  visible  in  a  shell  in  our 
standard  orientation,  at  about  128  ;um  (Fig.  1).  Cailliney 
(1975)  as  well  as  Mann  and  Gallager  (1985)  reported  that 
B.  gouldi  is  equidimensional  at  128  /xni  ^nd  71.4  ^m, 
respectively.  This  difference  (144  nm  vs  128  or  71.4  /um) 
is  probably  due  to  foreshortening  (shells  tilted)  in  the 
earlier  studies.  Fuller  et  al.  (1989c)  reported  that  T 
navalis  achieves  «iuidinieiisionalit\  at  150 /im.  The  ini- 
tial size  of  a  B.  goiiUIi  larva,  is  much  smaller  than  that 
of  the  larviparus  T.  navalis  due  to  differences  in  their 
development.  Despite  the  difference  in  initial  larval  shell 
size,  both  species  metamorphose  at  a  shell  height  of  about 
230  ^m,  as  indicated  b\  the  appearance  of  the  ligament 
pit. 

Table  3  shows  that  shell  height  increases  faster  than 
shell  length  until  just  before  metamorphosis  in  Bankia 
goiildi  (Culliney,  1975;  Mann  &  Gallager,  1985),  Teredo 
navalis  (Fuller  et  al.,  1989c),  and  Bankia  setacea  (Tryon, 
1863)  (Turner  &  Johnson,  1971).  The  slopes  are  signifi- 
cantly different  (P  =  <0.001)  as  shown  by  an  analysis 
of  covariance.  Moreover,  a  Tukey  multiple  comparison 
test  reveals  that  the  slope  for  B.  setacea  is  significantly 
lower  than  the  other  four  species  (P  =  <0.05,  Table  3). 
The  data  for  B.  gouldi  (this  study)  and  T.  navalis  (Fuller 
et  al.,  1989c)  are  from  measurements  of  SEM  micro- 
graphs of  disarticulated  left  valves,  whereas  the  data 
from  other  studies  are  based  on  light  microscope  mea- 
surements of  articulated  valves  (Culliney,  1975;  Turner 
&  Johnson,  1971;  Mann  &  Gallager,  1985).  We  have 
included  the  data  from  shells  of  recent  postmetamorphic 
larvae  since  the  ligament  pit,  an  earl)  indicator  of  meta- 
morphosis, is  difficult  to  detect  by  the  previous  studies. 

The  larvae  of  Bankia  gouldi  and  Teredo  navalis  can 
be  distinguished  on  the  basis  of  the  length  of  the  prov- 
inculum  on  the  left  valve.  The  average  length  of  the 
provinculum/hinge-line  measured  from  micrographs  of 
the  left  valves  of  B.  gouldi  (38. 1  ±  1.8^  m,  n  =  9;  Table 
1)  and  T.  navalis  (46.7  ±  1.3  ^m,  n  =  9;  Fuller  et.  al., 
1989c)  are  significantly  different  (Student  t-test,  P  < 
0.001).  Culliney  (1975)  reported  a  similar  difference  be- 
tween the  hinge-line  length  of  B.  goiddi  (40.4  ±  3.96 
Mm,  n  =  35)  and  T.  tiavalis  (51.3  ±  2.19  Mm,  n  =  47). 
The  same  conclusion  is  reached  using  a  simple  size  of  21 
for  B.  gouldi.  The  provincular  length  measurements  of 
the  left  valve  are  more  useful  than  those  of  the  right 
valve,  because  the  latter  varies  significantly  with  growth. 

The  larvae  of  Bankia  gouldi  and  6.  inartensi  (Stem- 
pell,  1899)  can  be  distinguished  from  Teredo  navalis  In 
the  length  of  the  posterior  provincular  tooth  of  the  left 
valve.  The  left  posterior  tooth  of  B.  gouldi  (6.4  ±  0.6 
Mm,  n  =  7)  and  B.  martensi  (6.4  ±  1.0  Mm,  n  =  10)  are 
significantK  shorter  that  that  of  T.  navalis  (8.2  ±  0.3 
Mm,  n  =  9). 

Clo.se  examination  of  the  internal  shell  surface  of  the 
valves  of  Teredo  navalis  (see  F'ig  I;  Fuller  et  al.,  1989c) 
reveals  a  lateral  hinge  system  similar  to  that  in  Bankia 


gouldi  The  longer  anterior  component  of  the  lateral 
hinge  system  in  larvae  of  B.  gouldi  longer  than  109  Mm 
appears  to  be  due  to  slightly  faster  growth  of  the  anterior 
shell  margin  relative  to  the  posterior  shell  margin.  This 
difference  may  be  useful  in  differentiating  the  two  spe- 
cies. 

Postlarval  shell:  Larvae  of  Bankia  goiddi  and  Teredo 
navalis  can  be  distinguished  by  the  number  of  ridges  vs. 
shell  length  in  shells  greater  than  1  mm  in  length.  Both 
species  develop  a  denticulated  ridge  at  about  0.24  mm 
in  length.  Denticulated  ridges  are  added  at  about  the 
same  rate  in  both  species  until  the  shell  reaches  1  mm. 
Subsequently,  the  number  of  denticulated  ridges  in  T. 
navalis  exceeds  that  in  6.  gouldi.  For  example,  at  a  shell 
length  of  2mm,  B.  gouldi  has  13  ridges,  compared  to 
about  28  ridges  in  T.  navalis.  In  the  early  larval  stage 
ot  B.  gouldi,  the  right  valve  is  longer  than  the  left  valve 
(Fig.  8),  but  the  degree  of  asymmetry  is  less  than  that 
in  T.  navalis.  The  shape  of  the  later,  postlarval  shell 
varies  greatly  with  the  type  of  wood  used  as  a  substratum 
by  the  teredinids  (Turner,  1966;  Turner  &  Johnson,  1971 ), 
and  the  environmental  conditions  at  the  collection  site 
(Hill  &  Kofoid,  1927). 

Pallet:  The  morphology  of  the  adult  pallet  is  important 
in  identification  of  teredinid  species  (Turner,  1966;  1971). 
In  Bankia  setacea,  the  pallet  first  appears  at  an  early 
postlarval  shell  length  of  0..5-0.6  mm  (Quayle,  1959).  In 
B.  gouldi,  the  smallest  individual  with  a  pallet  had  an 
early  postlarval  shell  length  of  0.4  mm.  The  pallet  at  this 
early  developmental  stage  is  unsegmented  and  may  be 
confused  with  the  nonsegmented  pallet  of  other  teredi- 
nids. Caution  is  advised  in  using  pallet  morphology  as  a 
taxonomic  tool  at  this  developmental  stage. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

We  thank  Mr.  John  Grazul  for  technical  ad\ice  related 
to  SEM,  and  Drs.  R.  Prezant,  R.  Tool,  D.  Marelli  and  B. 
Kotrla  for  insightful  discussions  on  several  aspects  of  B. 
gouldi  biology.  This  work  is  supported  partly  by  a  post- 
iloctoral  fellowship  grant  to  A.  S.  Tan  from  the  Fisheries 
and  Aquaculture  Technology  Extension  Center,  Rutgers 
L'niversity.  Institute  of  Marine  &  Coastal  Sciences  con- 
tibution  no.  93-14;  New  Jersey  Agricultural  Experiment 
Station  contribution  no  D-324()2-l-93;  Virginia  Institute 
ot  Marine  Science  contribution  no.  1778. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

( :arrikfr.  M.  \\  and  R  K.  Palmer.  1979.  llltrastructural  nior- 
plHigciicsi,s  of  prodis.socoiich  and  carl)  dissocoiicli  \ai\es 
of  the  oyster  Crassostrea  virginica.  Proceediniis  of  the 
National  Shellfisheries  Association  (•)9: 10.5- 128 

Castagiia,  M  and  J  N.  Kraeuter.  1984.  Maiivial  for  growing 
the  hard  clam  Merccnaria.  Special  Report  in  .Applied  Ma- 
rine .Science  and  Ocean  lOngineering  No,  249  Virginia 
lii.slitiitc  of  Marine  Science,  Gloucester,  X'irgiiiia,  1  Id  p. 

(:liaiilc\,  1'  and  J  I)  .Viuirews,  1971.  Aids  for  identificalion 
of  l>i\al\t'  lar\;ieof  \'jigliiia    Mahn'ologia  11(  1  ):4.5-l  19. 


Tan  et  al.,  1993 


Page  75 


Clianley,  P,  ami  P  Dinaniaiii  19S()  CoinparatiNc  ilescrip- 
tions  of  some  oyster  larvae  from  New  Zealand  and  (IhiJe, 
and  a  description  of  a  new  genus  of  o\ster,  Tio.slrca.  New 
Zealand  Journal  of  Marine  and  Freshwater  Research  14(2): 
103-120 

Culline\ ,  J  L.  1975  (Aimparati\e  lar\al  de\elopmeiit  ol  the 
shipworins  Banhia  gouldi  and  Teredo  nuialis  Marine  Bi- 
ology 29:245-25  L 

Fuller,  S.  C.  and  R.  A.  Lutz.  1989a.  Shell  morpholog)  ot 
larval  and  post-larval  mytilids  from  the  North-Western 
Atlantic.  Journal  of  the  Marine  Biological  Association  of 
the  United  Kingdom  69:181-218. 

Fuller.  S.  C,  R.  A.  Lutz  and  A.  Poole\.  1989h  Procedures 
for  accurate  documentation  of  shapes  and  dimensions  of 
larval  bivalve  shells  with  scanning  electron  niicroscopv. 
Transactions  of  the  American  Microscopical  Societ\'  I()8(  1 ): 
58-63. 

Fuller,  S.  C,  Y.  Hu,  R.  A.  Lutz  and  M.  Castagna.  1989c.  Shell 
and  pallet  morpholog\  in  early  developmental  stages  of 
Teredo  navalis  Linne  (Bivalvia:  Tereiiinidae).  The  Nau- 
tilus 103(1  ):24-35. 

Goodsell,  J.  G.,  S.  C.  Fuller,  A.  G.  Eversole,  M  C^astagna  ami 
R  .A  Lutz.  1992.  Larval  and  early  post!ar\al  shell  mor- 
pholog\  of  se\eral  \enerid  clams  Journal  of  the  Marine 
Biological  .Association  of  the  United  kingdom  72231-255 

Gustafson,  R.  G.  and  R.  A.  Lutz  1992.  Larval  and  earl)  post- 
larval  development  of  the  protobranch  bivalve  Solemija 
velum  (Mollusca:  Bivalvia).  Journal  of  the  Marine  Biolog- 
ical Association  of  the  United  Kingdom  72:383-402. 

Hill,  C.  L.  and  C.  A  Kofoid  (eds.)  1927  Marine  borers  and 
their  relation  to  marine  construction  on  the  Pacific  coast 
Final  Report  of  the  San  F'rancisco  Ba\  Marine  Piling  Gom- 
mittee.  Universits  of  Galifornia  Press,  San  f'^rancisco,  357  p 

j0rgensen,  C.  B.  1946.  Reproduction  and  larval  development 
of  Danish  marine  bottom  invertebrates  with  special  ref- 
erence to  the  planktonic  larvae  in  the  Sound  (0resund), 
Lamellibranchia.  Meddelelser  fra  Kommissionen  for  Dan- 
marks  Fiskeri-og  Ha\unders0gelser,  Serie:  Plankton  4:277- 
311. 

Kennedy,  V.  S.,  S.  G  Fuller  and  R  A  Lutz  1991.  Shell  and 
hinge  de\elopment  of  \oung  Corbicula  flumiiica  (Miiller) 
(Bivalvia:  Gorbiculoidea).  .American  Malacological  Bul- 
letin 8(1991):107-111. 

Le  Pennec,  M.  1980.  The  larval  and  post-larval  hinge  of  some 
families  of  bivalve  molluscs.  Journal  of  the  Marine  Bio- 
logical Association  of  the  United  Kingdom  (iO:601-617. 

Loosanoff,  \'.  L.  and  H.  C.  Davis.  1963.  Rearing  of  bivalve 
molluscs.  In  Russell,  F.S.  (ed.).  Advances  in  Marine  Bi- 
ology. Academic  Press,  New  York,  410  p 

Loosanoff,  V.  L.,  H.  C.  Davis  and  P.  C^hanlcN  1966  Dimen- 
sions and  shapes  of  larvae  of  some  marine  bivalve  molluscs. 
Malacologia(4):351-435. 


Lutz,  R.  A.  1985.  Identilic.ilion  ol  bi\aKc  lar\ae  and  postlar- 
vae:  a  review  of  recent  ad\ances.  .American  Malacological 
Bulletin,  Special  Edition  No.  l(1985):59-78. 

Lutz,  R.  .\  .  J.  Goodsell,  M  (,'astagna.  S  CJhapman,  (.'.  Newell, 
H  Hidu.  R  Mann,  D  Jablonski.  \'  Kennedy,  S  Sidall,  R, 
Cioldberg,  H  Beattie.  G.  Falmagne,  A  Ghestnut  and  A. 
Partridge  1982a.  Preliminary  observations  on  the  use- 
lulness  of  hinge  structures  for  identification  of  bivalve 
lar\ae  Journal  of  Shellfish  Research  2(l);65-70. 

Lutz.  R  A  ,  R  Mann.  J  G  Goodsell  and  M.  Castagna.  1982b. 
Larval  and  earl\  post-larval  development  of  Arctica  is- 
landica.  Journal  of  the  Marine  Biological  Association  of 
the  United  Kingdom  62:745-769. 

Mann,  R.  and  S.  M.  Clallager  1985.  Physiological  and  bio- 
chemical energetics  ol  larvae  Teredo  navalis  L.  ami  Ran- 
kia  gotddi  (Bartsch)  (Bivalvia:  Teredinidae).  Journal  ot 
Experimental  Marine  Biology  and  Ecology  85:211-228. 

Prezant,  R  S.  1990  Shell  and  hinge  ontogeny  of  the  Antarctic 
bivaKe  Lissarea  notoreudensis.  Journal  of  the  Marine  Bi- 
ological .Association  of  the  L'nited  Kingdom  70:841-855. 

Qua\  le,  D.  B  1959.  The  early  de\elopment  of  Bankia  setacea 
(Trvon)  In  Ra\.  D.C:.  (ed.).  Marine  Boring  and  Fouling 
Organisms.  Uni\ersitv  of  Washington  Press,  Seattle,  p.  157- 
174. 

Rees.  C'  11  1950  The  identilit'ation  and  classification  of  la- 
mellibranch  larvae  Hull  Bnlletin  of  Marine  Ecology  .3(9): 
7.3-104. 

Turner,  R  D.  1966  Sur\e\  and  illustrated  catalogue  of  the 
Teredinidae  (Mollusca:  Bivalvia).  Museum  of  Gompara- 
ti\e  Zoology.  Harvard  University.  Gambridge,  265  p. 

Turner,  R  D,  1971,  1,  Identification  of  marine  wood-boring 
molluscs.  In  Jones,  E  B  (;.  and  S.K.  Eltringham  (eds.). 
Marine  Borers.  Fungi  and  P"ouling  Organisms  of  Wood. 
Organisation  for  Economic  and  Go-operation  and  Devel- 
opment, Paris,  p.  17-65. 

Turner,  R.  D.  and  A.  G.  Johnson  1971.  13.  Identification  of 
marine  wood-boring  molluscs.  In.  Jones,  E.B.G.  and  S.K. 
Eltringham  (eds. ).  Marine  Borers.  Fungi  and  Fouling  Or- 
ganisms of  Wood.  Organisation  for  Economic  and  Co- 
operation and  Development,  Paris,  p.  259-301. 

Turner,  R  D  and  P.  J.  Boyle.  1975  Studies  of  bisalve  using 
the  scanning  electron  microscope  and  critical  point  drying. 
Bulletin  of  the  .American  Malacological  L'nion  for  1974, 
p.  59-65. 

Waller,  T  R.  1991.  Evolutionar\  relationships  among  com- 
mercial scallops  (Mollusca:  Bivalvia:  Pectinidae).  In. 
Shumway,  S.E.  (ed.).  Scallops:  Biology.  Ecology  and  Aqua- 
culture   Elsevier,  New  York,  p.  1-132 

Zar,  J.H.  1984  Biostatistical  Analysis.  Prentice-Hall, Englewood 
Cliffs,  New  Jersev,  718  p. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(2):76-78,  1993 


Page  76 


A  Simple  Method  for  the  In  Vitro  Culture  of  Perkinsiis  marinus 


S.J.  Kleinschuster 
S.L.  Swink 

Haskiii  Slifllfisli  Kfst'arcli  Lalioralory 

Department  of  Marine  and  Cxiastal  Sciences 

Instilnte  of  Maine  and  (Coastal  Sciences 

Ruti;ers  UniversiU 

Box'  B-8 

1  Miller  A\ciiuf 

Port  Norris,  NJ  08349  USA 


INTRODUCTION 

The  oyster  pathogen  Perkinsun  marinus  Levine,  1978  is 
an  apiconiplexan  protist  tliat  has  caused  sul)stantial  mor- 
tality among  oyster  populations  along  tiie  mid-Atlantic 
and  Gulf  coasts  of  the  United  States  and  may  be  capable 
of  cross-transmission  among  certain  bivalve  species  (Gog- 
gin  et  al.,  1989).  The  life  c\cle  ot  the  organism  has  been 
described  previously  (Mackin  &  Boswell,  1956;  Perkins, 
1966;  Perkins  &  Menzel,  1966).  Although  many  stages 
of  the  life  cycle  have  been  addressed,  little  evidence 
relative  to  mode  of  infection,  infiltration  and  invasion 
has  been  described  under  in  vitro  conditions.  Such  in- 
formation would  provide  insight  into  many  hitherto 
unobservable  aspects  of  the  host/parasite  relationship  in 
vivo.  This  study  demonstrates  that  certain  vegetative  re- 
productive aspects  in  the  life  cycle  of  the  organism,  nor- 
mally occurring  in  the  host,  can  be  duplicated  under 
relatively  simple  if!  vitro  conditions. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Parasitic  cells  were  isolated  from  primary  cultures  of 
tissue  explants  of  visceral  ganglia  of  Crassostrea  virginica 
Gmelin,  1791  and  identified  as  Pcrkinstis  ntarinns  using 
the  technicjue  of  Ray  (1952).  Eoilowing  isolation  of  the 
protist,  various  mixtures  of  Leibowitz's  (1952)  medium 
(L-15),  oyster  hemolymph,  fetal  bovine  .serum  (FBS), 
various  sugars,  yeast  extract  and  lactalbumin  hydrolysate 
were  tested  for  cell  growth  potential.  The  osmolaritv  of 
each  licjuid  component  was  adjusted  to  750  mOs/kg  by 
the  addition  of  sea  salts.  The  pH  of  each  medium  and/ 
or  constituent  was  adjusted  to  7.6  and  filter  sterilized. 
(Cultures  were  grown  at  28°C;  in  rilasks  utider  ambient 
CO2/O2.  Penicillin  G  (100  U/ml)  and  streptomycin  (0.1 
mg/ml)  were  routinely  added  to  all  cultures  and  the 
medium  (50%)  exchanged  weekly. 

Mantle  tissue  lor  challenge  experiments  w  as  from  I'er- 
hinsits-hee  o\sters  which  were  routinely  biopsed  and 
maintained  in  isolated  aciuaria.  Sterile  explants  were  ob- 


tained by  culturing  the  tissue  for  4  days  at  25°C  in  a  1:1 
sterile  sea  water/hemolymph  mixture  supplemented  with 
penicillin  G  (100  U/ml),  streptomycin  (0.1  mg/ml)  and 
amphotericin  B  (0.25  ;ug/ml). 


RESULTS 

Healthy  explant  cultures  of  visceral  ganglia  of  Crassos- 
trea virginica  are  seen  in  figures  1  and  2.  Similar  explant 
cultures  being  parasitized  by  Perkinsiis  marinus  are  seen 
in  figures  3  and  4.  Colonization  of  large  and  small  groups 
of  oNster  nervous  tissue  is  readiK  apparent  as  is  the  at- 
tachment of  parasitic  cells  to  individual  oyster  cells.  Var- 
ious media  preparations  to  be  evaluated  for  optimal 
growth  were  inoculated  with  parasitic  cells  from  similar 
cultures.  Approximately  two  weeks  after  inoculation,  it 
w  as  evident  that  all  media  preparations  evaluated  would 
support  cell  growth  to  varying  degrees.  Cultures  con- 
taining a  high  percentage  of  hemolymph  displayed  vig- 
orous and  rapid  propagation  (figures  5  and  6).  Cells  cul- 
tured with  a  high  percentage  of  L-15  and/or  FBS  (50%) 
tended  to  differentiate  into  cells  that  resemble  prezoospo- 
rangia  (figure  5,  double  arrows)  (i.e.,  large  cells  greater 
than  ca.  20  um  with  the  cellular  \  olume  consisting  mostly 
of  a  vacuole  anil  the  c\  toplasin  occup\  ing  the  perimeter 
of  the  cell;  as  described  by  Perkins  and  Menzel,  1966). 
Many  non-flagellated  daughter  cells  were  formed  in  those 
cells  xielding  the  morula-like  cell  aggregates  typical  of 
Pcrkinsus  marinus.  L'pon  rupture  of  the  mother  cell  wall 
the  daughter  cells  are  released  into  the  mediiun  (figures 
5  and  6,  arrows).  Shortly  after  release  of  the  daughter 
cells,  until  enlargement  to  form  prezoosporangium-like 
cells,  thr\  had  the  ts  pical  Perkinsus  Hiori/n/.s-like  meront 
structure  consisting  of  a  prominent,  eccentric  vacuole 
(figure  6,  double  arrows)  with  a  single  vacuoplast  (figure 
6,  V  arrow)  and  a  single  nucleus  located  near  the  cell 
wall. 

The  most  successlul  medium  [ireparation,  yielding  rel- 
ativt'K   large  numbers  oi  cells  as  well  as  a  diversity  of 


S.  J.  Kleinsclnister  and  S.  L.  Swink,  1993 


Page  77 


>- 


H 


^\v 


P 


fX 


N 


-//   v^ 


/ 
/. 


S 


V 


^-^.:. 


-> 


N 


Figures  1-2.  Photomicrographs  of  health\  visceral  ganjihon  cxplaiits  from  Crassostrea  virginica.  Neurite  growth  extending  from 
explants  indicated  by  arrows,  scale  bar  =  (I  1  rmn 

Figures  3-4.  Photomicrographs  of  oyster  ganglion  explants  parasitized  by  Perkinsus  marinus  (P).  Notice  individual  neurons  (N), 
support  cells  (S),  hemocytes  (H)  and  attachment  of  parasitic  cells  to  individual  oyster  cells  (arrows),  scale  bar  =  0.05  mm. 


life  cycle  stages  consisted  of  a  100  mi.  solution  of  L-15 
containing  10.0  ml.  of  FBS,  20.0  ml.  of  o\ster  hemo- 
lymph,  5.0  mg.  taurine,  50.0  mg.  glucose,  30.0  mg.  ga- 
lactose, 50.0  mg.  fructose,  50.0  mg  trehalose,  100.0  mg. 
yeast  extract,  300.0  mg.  lactalbumin  Inclrolysate,  1.0  ml 
MEM  N'itamin  solution  (100X)(Sigma  C^hemical  C^o.)  and 
0.1  ml  lipid  nnxture  (1000X)(Sigma  Chemical  C:o.).  Cul- 
tures were  routinely  sub-cultured  over  a  period  of  several 


months  Sterile  mantle  tissue  was  challenged  with  cul- 
tured Perkinsiis  marinus  and  became  infected  within 
2-3  weeks.  In  fluid  thioglycollate  medium  the  parasite 
cells  from  challenged  tissue  formed  cells  resembling  the 
prezoosporangia  (or  "hypnospores")  normally  seen  in 
oyster  tissue  infected  with  Pcrkin.stts  marinus.  The  cells 
also  stained  like  Pcrkiustis  marinus  prezoosporangia  in 
Lugol's  iochne  solution  (Rax,  1952). 


Page  78 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


rj!^U\ 


-tx. 


■pT-^S 


%^ 


:-v^(S 


^"  ''<'^* 


''^^ 


•*t' 


il^\  <^'. 


6    v-'at 


Figures  5-6.  Photomicrographs  of  groups  of  propagative  cells  of  Perkinsus  marinus  in  vitro.  Larger  groups  represent  several 
generations.  Figure  5.  Notice  presporangial  cells  (double  arrows)  and  non-flagellated  daughter  cells  (single  arrows).  Figure  6. 
Perkinsus-\\ke  cells  with  nieront  structure  (double  arrows),  vacuoplast  (V  arrow)  and  non-flagellated  daughter  cells  (single  arrows), 
scale  bar  =  0.05  mm. 


DISCUSSION 

It  is  hoped  that  the  technique  described  herein  will  con- 
tribute to  the  understanding  of  the  basic  biology  of  this 
parasite  as  well  as  to  the  host/parasite  relationship.  Re- 
finement of  culture  conditions  and  further  definition  of 
nutritional  rec}uirements  of  the  parasite  in  vitro  would 
be  particularly  helpful  as  cellular  or  molecular  approach- 
es to  this  understanding  are  attempted. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  authors  wish  to  thank  Dr.  F  O.  Perkins  for  his 
invaluable  assistance  with  this  study .  This  work  was  fund- 
ed by  the  New  Jersey  Agriculture  E.xperiment  Station, 
Hatch  Project  number  32100  and  is  identified  as  paper 
no.  D-.32100-1-93  and  as  paper  no.  93-09  for  the  Institute 
of  Marine  and  Coastal  Sciences. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Goggin,  C.  L.,  K.B  Sewell  and  R  T.G.  Lester.  1989.  Cross- 
infection  experiments  with  Australian  Perkiitsus  species. 
Diseases  of  Aquatic  Organisms  7(l):55-59. 

Liebowitz,  A.  1963.  The  growth  and  maintenance  of  tissue 
cell  cultures  in  free  gas  exchange  with  the  atmosphere. 
American  Journal  of  Hygiene  78:173-183. 

Mackin,  J.  G.  and  T.  L.  B  Boswell.  1956.  The  life  cycle  and 
relationships  of  Dermocijstidiutn  marinum.  Proceedings 
of  the  National  Shellfish  Association  46:112-115. 

Perkins,  F.  O.  1966.  Life  History  Studies  of  Dermocystidium 
marinutu,  an  Oyster  Pathogen,  Dissertation,  Florida  State 
University,  Tallahassee,  FL. 

Perkins,  F.  O.  and  R.  W.  Menzel.  1966.  Morphological  and 
cultural  studies  of  a  motile  stage  in  the  life  cycle  of  Der- 
mocystidium marinum.  Proceedings  of  the  National  Shell- 
fish Association  56:23-30 

Ray,  S.  M.  1952.  A  culture  technicjue  for  the  diagnosis  of 
infection  with  Dermocystidium  marinum  Mackin,  Owen 
and  CA)llier  in  Ovsters.  Science  116:360. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(2):79-80,  1993 


Page  79 


On  the  Identification  of  Fossil  Terrestrial  Gastropod  Eggshells 


Harold  G.  Pierce 

Research  Associate 

University  of  Nebraska  State  Museum 

Lincoln,  NE  68588-0514,  USA 


Small  (~1  mm),  calcareous  spheroids,  often  olilate,  are 
frequently  recovered  associated  with  iionmarine  mol- 
lusks  from  Quaternary  localities  on  the  High  Plains.  In 
general,  these  eggshells  of  terrestrial  gastropods  have  been 
ignored  by  modern  paleontologists.  Tompa  (1976a)  cor- 
rectly correlated  fossil  eggshells  from  two  middle  Pleis- 
tocene localities  in  Kansas  with  the  genus  Vallonia.  Tom- 
pa  followed  with  a  benchmark  paper  (Tompa,  1976b)  in 
which  he  illustrated  the  eggshells  of  many  ta.xa  and  pro- 
vided a  catalog  of  terrestrial  species  with  partially  or 
wholly  calcified  eggshells.  Improved,  and  gentler,  prep- 
aration techniques  have  resulted  in  encountering  both  a 
greater  abundance  and  frequency  of  these  gastropod 
eggshells,  especially  in  material  of  mid-Pleistocene  to 
Recent  age.  Recently,  I  recovered  a  substantial  number 
of  much  older  (21-28  Ma)  gastropod  eggshells  from  the 
Oligocene-Miocene  Cabbage  Patch  fauna  of  southwest- 
ern Montana.  Since  these  eggshells  were  associated  with 
a  prolific  and  diverse  terrestrial  gastropod  fauna  (Pierce, 
1992),  an  attempt  was  made  to  identify  the  taxa  that 
produced  these  eggshells. 

In  almost  all  cases,  microscopic  examination  by  trans- 
mitted light,  and  careful  dissection  of  some  specimens, 
has  shown  the  fossil  eggshells  to  be  empty.  Correlation 
of  the  eggshells  with  the  various  taxa  in  the  fauna  can 
be  accomplished  by  comparison  of  hatchling  size  and 
shape  to  the  size  and  shape  of  the  eggshells.  The  two 
types  of  Cabbage  Patch  eggshells  were  both  oblate  sphe- 
roids that  differed  primarily  in  size  (Table  1 ).  The  smaller 
eggshell  matched  very  closely,  in  all  dimensions,  mea- 
surements of  the  hatchlings  of  Vallonia  berryi  Pierce, 
1992,  from  the  same  fauna.  The  larger  eggshell  type  was 
found  to  be  marginally  large  enough,  but  too  oblate,  to 
accommodate  hatchling  of  Oreohelix  brandi  Pierce,  1992, 
another  component  of  this  fauna.  This  match  was  also 
rejected  on  the  basis  that  modern  Oreohelix  are  ovivi- 
parous.  Hatchlings  of  another  species,  Polygyroidea 
montivaga  Pierce,  1992,  were  a  near  perfect  match,  both 
in  size  and  shape.  No  other  taxa  of  this  fauna  had  hatch- 
lings that  corresponded  to  the  measurements  of  these 
eggshells  (Pierce,  1992). 

Current  work  involving  the  Skull  Creek  locality  in 
Butler  County,  Nebraska  (late  Pleistocene:  Wisconsinan: 
Peoria  loess,  ca.  20  Ka),  provided  a  new  collection  of 
gastropod  eggshells.  The  Skull  Creek  material  contains 


at  least  two  ciuite  diilerent  eggshell  forms  (Table  1).  The 
first,  an  oblate  spheroid,  H/W  =  0.68,  was  very  thin  and 
delicate,  and  is  represented  by  only  8  specimens,  half  of 
which  are  broken.  In  size  and  H/W,  it  compared  closely 
with  the  eggshells  attributed  to  Oligo-Miocene  Vallonia 
berryi,  and  to  mid-Pleistocene  to  Recent  Vallonia  pul- 
chella  (Mijller,  1774)  (Tompa,  1976a).  Measurements  of 
hatchling  gastropods  recovered  as  part  of  the  Skull  Creek 
locality  fauna  showed  that  hatchlings  of  Vallonia  gra- 
cilicosta  Reinhardt  1883,  averaging  0.7  mm  x  0.55  mm, 
were  an  excellent  fit,  in  both  size  and  shape,  for  this 
eggshell  (Figures  1-3).  The  second  eggshell  type  is  a  near 
spheroid,  H/W  =  0.93  or  greater,  and  occurs  in  two 
slightly  overlapping  size  ranges,  each  with  distinct  modes. 
The  larger  eggshell  of  this  type  is  quite  abundant  (>50) 
(Figures  4-6).  This  eggshell  size  and  shape  was  found  to 
be  an  approximate  fit  for  hatchlings  of  three  taxa  found 
in  this  fauna,  all  of  which  are  known  to  have  calcified 


Figures  1-3.  Small  fossil  eggshells  and  hatcliling  of  Vallonia 
gracilicosta  Reinhardt,  1883.  \.  Eggshell  with  crack  and  small 
fragment  missing,  lot  PM.SC  1002  2.  Hatchling  \'.  gracilicosta. 
lot  P\  AL  1002  3.  Broken  eggshell,  lot  PMSC  1002. 
Figures  4-6.  Large  eggshell  with  embryo  and  hatchling  ot 
Discus  uhitneyi  (Newcomb,  1864).  4.  Hatchling  D.  whitneyi. 
lot  PDIS  1004.  5.  Large  eggshell,  lot  PMSC  1001  6.  Embryonic 
D  whitneyi  still  retaining  portions  of  its  eggshell,  PDIS  1016 
,\ll  figures  20  X,  all  from  Skull  Creek  locality,  Butler  County, 
Nebraska. 


Page  80 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  2 


Table  1.    Mea-suremt'iits  (in  mm)  of  fossil  gastropod  eggshells 


Eggshells 


\Vidtli/SD 
Range 


Height/SD 
Range 


H/W 


Oligo-Miocene  taxa 
Cabbage  Patch  mollustan  fauna 
Vallonia  berryi 

Polygyroidea  montivaga 

Late  Pleistocene  ta.xa 
Skull  Creek  molluscan  famia 
Vallonia  gracilicosta 

Discus  ichitneyi 

Discus  whitneyi?  small 


10 

0,76  ±  0.03 

0.57  ±  0.02 

0.75 

0.72-0.80 

0.55-0.60 

1(1 

L60  ±  0.03 

L24  ±  0.04 

0.78 

L55-I.65 

1.15-L.30 

4 

0.80  ±  0.00 

0.55  ±  0.00 

0.68 

0.80-0.80 

0.55-0.55 

10 

1.20  ±  0.03 

1.13  ±  0.01 

0.94 

1.15-1.25 

1.12-1.15 

5 

1.03  ±  0.05 

0,96  ±  0,04 

0.93 

0  95-1  10 

0  90-1  00 

eggshells  (Tompa,  1976b,  table  1):  Nesovitrea  hammonis 
electrina  (Gould  1841),  averaging  1.15  mm  x  0.75  mm, 
Zonitoides  arboreus  (Say  1816),  averaging  1.1  mm  x  0.8 
mm,  and  Discus  whitneyi  (Newcomb  1864),  averaging 
1.1  mm  X  0.8  mm,  with  the  latter  two  providing  the 
best  fit.  [Roth  (1987:129)  has  shown  D.  whitneyi  to  be  a 
senior  synonym  of  the  well  known  D.  cronkhitei  (New- 
comb,  1865)].  By  chance,  one  eggshell  contained  a  em- 
bryo, identifiable  as  D.  whitneiji  (Figure  6).  Roth  V. 
gracilicosta  and  D.  whitneyi  are  very  abundant  (>200 
specimens  each)  components  of  the  Skull  Creek  mollus- 
can fauna.  Zonitoides  arboreus  and  N.  hammonis  elec- 
trina are  less  common  (16-50  specimens  each)  compo- 
nents. A  second,  smaller  set  (N=5)  of  the  nearly  spheroidal 
eggshell  type,  microscopically  indistinguishable  from  the 
larger  size,  could  not  be  matched  precisely  with  any  other 
taxon,  but  would  fit  the  extreme  minimum  hatchling  size 
of  both  D.  whitneyi  and  N.  hammonis  electrina.  Tompa 
(1976b:867)  has  shown  that,  for  some  taxa,  eggshell  size 
varies  from  individual  to  individual,  and/or  with  size  of 
parent  animal.  It  appears  probable,  therefore,  that  these 
also  represent  D.  whitneyi  eggshells,  but  from  small  par- 
ents. 

Identification  of  eggshell  types  provides  yet  another 
tool  useful  in  reconstructing  fossil  faunas.  As  more  egg- 
shells are  identified  to  genus  and/or  species,  it  may  be- 
come possible  that  additional  taxa,  represented  only  by 
eggshells  in  a  fauna,  can  be  identified,  thereby  increasing 
the  recognized  diversity  of  the  fossil  fauna  and  the  ac- 
curacy of  paleoenvironmental  reconstruction.  However, 
with  rare  exceptions  rc()uiring  SEM  examination  (Tompa 
1976b),  identification  beyond  generic  level  is,  at  this  time, 
often  tenuous. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Gould  A.  A.  1841,  Report  on  the  Invertebrata  of  Massachu- 
setts, comprising  the  Mollusca,  Oustacea,  Annelida,  and 
Radiata.  Foisom,  Wells,  and  Thurston,  Cambridge.  373 
p,,  213  figs, 

Miiller,  O.  F.  1774.  Vermium  terrestrium  et  Duviatilum,  seu 
animalium  Infusorium,  Heiminthicorum  et  Testaceorum 
non  marinorum  succinta  historia.  Volumen  .Alterum  Hei- 
neck  et  Faber,  Haviniae  et  Lipsiae.  214  p. 

New  comb,  W  1864  Descriptions  of  nine  new  species  of  Helix 
inhabiting  California  Proceedings  of  the  California  .Acad- 
emy of  Sciences  (1)  3:1 1.5-119. 

Newcomb,  W.  1865.  Descriptions  of  new  species  of  land 
shells.  Proceedings  of  the  California  Academy  of  Sciences 
(1)3:179-182. 

Reinliardt,  O  1883.  Sitzungsberichte  der  Gesellschaft  Na- 
lurforschender  Fruende,  Berlin,  1883(2):42 

Holh,  B.  1987,  Identifications  of  two  (;alifornian  land  mollusks 
tlescribed  bv  VVeslev  Newcomb  Malacological  Review  20: 
129-1.32, 

Pierce,  H,  G,  1992.  The  nonmarine  mollusks  of  the  late  Oli- 
gocene-early  Miocene  Cabbage  Patch  Fauna  of  western 
Montana.  II.  Terrestrial  gastropod  families  other  than  Pup- 
illidae  (Pulmonata:  Stylommatophora).  Journal  of  Pale- 
ontology 66(4):618-62S. 

■Say,  T.     1816.    Conchology,  Nicholson  s  British  Encyclopedia 


of  Arts  and  Sciences,  1st  (American)  ed. 


unpaged. 


Tompa,  A,  1976a  Fossil  eggs  of  the  land  snail  genus  Vallonia 
(Pulmonata:  Valloniidae).  The  Nautilus  90(l):5-7. 

Tompa,  A.  1976b.  A  comparative  study  of  the  ultrastructure 
and  mineralogy  of  calcified  land  snail  eggs  (Pulmonata: 
Stylommatophora),  Journal  of  Morphology  1.5()(4):861-888. 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


THE  NAUTILUS  publishes  papers  on  all  aspects  of  the 
biology  and  systematics  of  mollusks.  Manuscripts  de- 
scribing original,  unpublished  research  as  well  as  review 
articles  will  be  considered.  Brief  articles,  not  exceeding 
1000  words,  will  be  published  as  notes  and  do  not  re- 
quire an  abstract.  Notices  of  meetings  and  other  items 
of  interest  to  malacologists  will  appear  in  a  news  and 
notices  section. 

Manuscripts:  Each  original  manuscript  and  accompa- 
nying illustrations  should  be  submitted  in  triplicate.  Text 
must  be  typed  on  one  side  of  8'/2  x  1 1  inch  white  paper, 
double  spaced  throughout  (including  literature  cited,  ta- 
bles and  figure  captions),  with  at  least  1  inch  of  margin 
on  all  sides.  All  pages  must  be  numbered  consecutively. 
If  printed  on  a  word  processor,  the  right  margin  should 
be  ragged  rather  than  justified.  Authors  should  follow 
the  recommendations  of  the  Council  of  Biology  Editors 
Style  Manual,  which  is  available  from  the  Council  of 
Biology  Editors,  Inc.,  9650  Rockville  Pike,  Bethesda,  MD 
20814,  U.S.A.  The  first  mention  of  a  scientific  name  in 
the  text  should  be  accompanied  by  the  taxonomic  au- 
thority, including  year.  Latin  names  and  words  to  be 
printed  in  italics  must  be  underlined;  leave  other  indi- 
cations to  the  editor.  Metric  and  Celsius  units  are  to  be 
used. 

The  sequence  of  sections  should  be:  title  page,  abstract 
page,  introduction,  materials  and  methods,  results,  dis- 
cussion, acknowledgements,  literature  cited,  tables,  fig- 
ure captions,  figures.  The  title  page  should  include  the 
title,  author's  name(s)  and  address(es).  The  abstract  page 
should  contain  the  title  and  abstract,  which  should  sum- 
marize in  250  words  or  less  the  scope,  main  results  and 
conclusions  of  the  paper.  The  abstract  may  be  followed 
by  a  maximum  of  8  key  words.  All  references  cited  in 
the  text  must  appear  in  the  literature  cited  section  and 
vice  versa.  In  the  literature  cited  section,  all  authors 
must  be  fully  identified  and  listed  alphabetically.  Follow 
a  recent  issue  of  THE  NAUTILUS  for  bibliographic  style, 
noting  that  journal  titles  must  be  unabbreviated.  Infor- 
mation on  plates  and  figures  should  be  cited  only  if  not 
included  in  the  pagination.  Tables  must  be  numbered 
and  each  placed  on  a  separate  sheet.  A  brief  legend  must 
accompany  each  table.  Captions  for  each  group  of  illus- 
trations should  be  typed  on  a  separate  sheet  and  include 
a  key  to  all  lettered  labeling  appearing  in  that  group  of 
illustrations. 


All  line  drawings  must  be  in  black,  high  quality  ink, 
clearly  detailed  and  completely  labeled.  Photographs 
must  be  on  glossy,  high  contrast  paper.  All  figures  are 
to  be  consecutively  numbered  (figs.  1,  2,  3,  ...  ,  NOT 
figs.  la.  lb,  Ic,  .  .  .  NOR  plate  1,  fig.  1  .  .  .).  Illustrations 
must  be  arranged  in  proportions  that  will  conform  with 
the  width  of  a  page  (6%  inches  or  171  mm)  or  a  column 
(3V4  inches  or  82  mm).  The  maximum  size  of  a  printed 
figure  is  6%  by  9  inches  or  171  by  228  mm.  All  illus- 
trations must  be  fully  cropped,  mounted  on  a  firm,  white 
backing,  numbered,  labeled  and  camera  ready.  The  au- 
thor's name,  paper  title  and  figure  number(s)  should  ap- 
pear on  the  back.  Original  illustrations  must  be  between 
one  and  two  times  the  desired  final  size.  It  is  the  author's 
responsibility  that  the  line  weight  and  lettering  are  ap- 
propriate for  the  desired  reduction.  Original  illustrations 
will  be  returned  to  the  author  if  requested.  Color  illus- 
trations can  be  included  at  extra  cost  to  the  author. 

Voucher  Material:  Deposition  of  type  material  in  a 
recognized  public  museum  is  a  requirement  for  publi- 
cation of  papers  in  which  new  species  are  described. 
Deposition  of  representative  voucher  specimens  in  such 
institutions  is  strongly  encouraged  for  all  other  types  of 
research  papers. 

Processing  of  Manuscripts:  Upon  receipt,  every  manu- 
script is  acknowledged  and  sent  for  critical  review  by  at 
least  two  referees.  These  reviews  serve  as  the  basis  for 
acceptance  or  rejection.  Accepted  manuscripts  are  re- 
turned to  the  author  for  consideration  of  the  reviewers' 
comments.  A  finalized  version  of  the  manuscript  is  re- 
turned to  the  editor  and  sent  to  press.  Two  sets  of  proofs 
are  sent  to  the  author  for  correction.  Changes  other  than 
typesetting  errors  will  be  charged  to  the  author  at  cost. 
One  set  of  corrected  proofs  should  be  sent  to  the  editor 
as  soon  as  possible.  Authors  with  institutional,  grant  or 
other  research  support  will  be  billed  for  page  charges  at 
the  rate  of  $60.00  per  printed  page. 

An  order  form  for  reprints  will  accompany  the  proofs. 
Reprints  may  be  ordered  through  the  editor. 

Manuscripts,  corrected  proofs  and  correspondence  re- 
garding editorial  matters  should  be  sent  to:  Dr.  M.G. 
Harasewych,  Editor,  Division  of  Mollusks,  NHB  stop  118, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution, Washington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


THIS  PUBLICATION  IS  PRINTED  ON  ACID-FREE  PAPER. 


rHE  NAUTILUS 


Volume  107,  Number  3 
February  2,  1994 
ISSN  0028-1344 

A  quarterly  devoted 
to  malacology. 


FFR  1  A.  iqP4 


VUr.'-rv    Hol6     M^, 


EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Dr.  M.  G.  Harasewych 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 

ASSOCIATE  EDITOR 
Dr.  R.  Tucker  Abbott 
.American  Malacologists,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  2255 
Melbourne,  FL  32902 

CONSULTING  EDITORS 
Dr.  Riidiger  Bieler 
Department  of  Invertebrates 
Field  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Chicago,  IL  60605 

Dr.  Robert  T.  Dillon,  Jr. 
Department  of  Biology 
College  of  Charleston 
Charleston,  SC  29424 

Dr.  William  K.  Emerson 

Department  of  Living  Invertebrates 

The  American  Museum  of  Natural 

History 

New  York,  NY  10024 

Dr.  Robert  Hershler 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Dr.  Richard  S.  Houbrick 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Mr.  Richard  I.  Johnson 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Aurele  La  Rocque 
Department  of  Geology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  James  H.  McLean 
Department  of  Malacology 
Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
900  Exposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007 

Dr.  Arthur  S.  Merrill 
%  Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Ms.  Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 
Harbor  Branch  Oceanographic 
Institution,  Inc. 
Ft.  Pierce,  FL  33450 

Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore 

Division  of  Marine  Geology 

and  Geophysics 

Rosenstiel  School  of  Marine  and 

Atmospheric  Science 

University  of  Miami 

4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 

Miami,  FL  33149 

Dr.  Gustav  Paulay 
Marine  Laboratory 
University  of  Guam 
Mangilao,  Guam  96923 

Mr.  Richard  E.  Petit 

P.O.  Box  30 

North  Myrtle  Beach,  SC  29582 

Dr.  Edward  J.  Petuch 
Department  of  Geology 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431 


Dr.  David  H.  Stansbery 
Museum  of  Zoology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  Ruth  D.  Turner 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Geerat  J.  Vermeij 
Department  of  Geology 
University  of  California  at  Davis 
Davis,  CA  95616 


SUBSCRIPTION  INFORMATION 
The  subscription  rate  per  volume 
is  US  $25.00  for  individuals,  US 
$40.00  for  institutions.  Postage 
outside  the  United  States  is  an 
additional  US  $5.00  for  surface 
and  US  $12.00  for  air  mail.  All 
orders  should  be  accompanied  by 
payment  and  sent  to:  THE 
NAUTILUS,  P.O.  Box  7279,  Silver 
Spring,  MD  20907-7279,  USA. 

Change  of  address:    Please  inform 
the  publisher  of  your  new  address 
at  least  6  weeks  in  advance.  All 
communications  should  include 
both  old  and  new  addresses  (with 
zip  codes)  and  state  the  effective 
date. 

THE  NAUTILUS  (ISSN  0028- 
1344)  is  published  quarterly  by 
Trophon  Corporation,  8911  Alton 
Parkway,  Silver  Spring,  MD  20910. 

Second  Class  postage  paid  at  Silver 
Spring,  MD  and  additional  mailing 
offices. 

POSTMASTER:  Send  address 
changes  to:  THE  NAUTILUS 
P.O.  Box  7279 
Silver  Spring,  MD  20907-7279 


T  H  Ef7N  AU  T  I  L  U  S 


CONTENTS 


Volume  107,  Number  3 

February  2,  1994 

ISSN  0028-1344 

- '  -1  Jii 

uorar/ 

Two  New  Tropical  Western  Atlantic  Species  of 

Epitonium.  with  Notes  on  Similar  Global  Species  and 

Natural  History 81 

Wooft<!  Hole.  MA  02 

Phalium  (Semicassis)  vector,  a  New  Deep- Water  Species 

from  the  Central  Indian  Ocean  94 

Ferussac  and  d  Orbigny  s  " Histoire  naturelle  generate  et 

particuliere  des  Cephalopodes  acetabidiferes".  Dates  of 

Publication  of  Plates  and  Text     97 

Alvania  valeriae  (Gastropoda:  Rissoidae),  a  New  Species 

from  off  Southeastern  Brazil  104 


Robert  Robertson 


R.  Tucker  Abbot! 


Annie  Tiilier 

Renata  Boucher-Rodoni 


Ricardo  Silva  Absalao 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(3):81-93,  1993 


Page  81 


Two  New  Tropical  Western  Atlantic  Species  of  Epitonium,  with 
Notes  on  Similar  Global  Species  and  Natural  History 


Roberl  Robertson 

UepartmeiU  of  Malacology 
The  Acadenu  ot  Natural  Sciences 
1900  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway 
Philadelphia,  PA  19103-1195,  U.S.A. 


ABSTRACT 

Two  large  (up  to  16.9  and  25, .'5  mm  long),  main  -ribbed,  shallow 
water  species  of  Epitonium  are  newly  described;  £,  phymanlhi 
from  southeast  Florida,  the  15ahamas,  and  the  West  Indies,  and 
£.  worsfoldi  from  the  Bahamas  and  the  West  Indies.  Where 
possible,  rib  counts  were  made  on  each  shell  whorl  to  allow  for 
ontogenetic  changes.  Epitonium  phijnmntlii  lives  with  and  feeds 
on  the  sea  anemone  Phijmanthus  crucifcr  in  Florida  (where 
E.  lamellosum  and  another  epitoniid  Opalia  crenata  also  live 
with  this  anemone).  Likewise,  £.  worsfoldi  lives  with  and  feeds 
on  a  sand-d\\  elling  anemone  that  is  either  Actinoporus  clcgans 
or  Homostichanthus  duerdeni  in  the  Bahamas.  There  it  is  more 
commonly  parasitic  on  another  anemone,  Stichodactyla  he- 
lianlhus.  .'\quarium  observations  on  £.  phymanlhi  with  £. 
lamellosum  revealed  some  major  biological  differences  be- 
tween these  co-occurring  species,  e.g.  fully  everted  proboscis 
lengths  and  speed  of  movement.  Epitonium  phynianthi  was 
found  with  £  ivorsfoldi  at  only  one  localit> ,  as  shells  in  the 
Virgin  Islands. 

Key  words:    Epitoniidae.  new  species.  Western  .Atlantic 


INTRODUCTION 

The  family  Epitoniidae  contains  a  large  number  of  de- 
scribed fossil  and  living  species,  and  as  with  most  groups 
of  mollusks  there  is  as  yet  no  world  monograph.  In  the 
interim,  it  could  be  argued  that  there  should  be  a  mor- 
atorium on  describing  any  new  epitoniids.  The  literature 
is  very  scattered  and  unsynthesized.  There  is  not  even  a 
published  list  of  names.  Nevertheless,  it  is  here  believed 
that  minimum  requirements  are  met  for  describing  two 
new  species,  albeit  v\  ithout  anatomy. 

This  paper  is  a  by-product  of  work  on  a  book  on  the 
marine  prosobranchs  of  the  Bahamas  being  prepared  by 
myself.  Jack  N.  Worsfold,  and  Colin  Redfern.  New  spe- 
cies are  not  being  described  therein. 

The  conchological  systematics  of  Recent  Epitoniidae 
(wentletraps)  in  the  western  Atlantic  and  eastern  Pacific 
(where  cognate  forms,  subspecies  or  species  can  be  ex- 
pected) are  relatively  well  know  n  thanks  to  Clench  and 
Turner  (1950b,  1951,  1952,  1953)  and  DuShane  (1974, 


1979).  Little  systematic  work  has  since  been  done  on  the 
western  Atlantic  species.  Even  so,  it  was  surprising  to 
conclude  that  two  large,  many-ribbed,  shallow-water  Ep- 
itonium species  had  remained  undescribed  until  now. 
One  ranges  from  southeastern  Florida  and  the  Bahamas 
to  the  Lesser  Antilles  (Grenada).  The  other  ranges  from 
the  Bahamas  to  Cuba,  Puerto  Rico  and  the  Virgin  Islands. 
Both  may  well  have  more  extended  ranges.  As  recently 
as  1967,  one  of  the  species  was  first  collected  alive;  it  was 
in  less  than  1  m  of  water  within  sight  of  a  major  marine 
laboratory! 

Clench  and  Turner  had  neither  of  these  species  avail- 
able in  the  collections  they  studied  [although  a  small, 
badly  broken  shell  of  one  of  them  was  mi.xed  in  a  vial 
with  one  £.  albidum  (Orbigny,  1842)  (MCZ  107820). 

Some  epitoniid  species  seem  possibly  or  probabK  to 
be  circumglobal  (Robertson  and  Habe,  1965;  Kilburn, 
1972,  1985;  DuShane,  1983;  Paschall,  1987).  Therefore, 
an  attempt  has  been  made  to  consider  the  two  new  spe- 
cies in  a  global  context.  Based  on  epitoniid  collections  at 
MCZ,  AMNH,  ANSP  and  USNM  and  literature,  shells 
of  23  species  from  around  the  world  (.\ppendi.x)  were 
assessed  to  be  most  similar  to  the  shells  described  here. 

I  have  tried  to  survey  all  the  descriptions  and  illustra- 
tions of  Miocene  to  Recent  species  of  Epitonium,  sensu 
lata,  known  from  the  Americas,  and  of  most  Recent 
species  from  here  and  the  rest  of  the  world,  especially 
Europe  and  the  Mediterranean.  These  are  the  fossils  and 
living  animals  most  likely  to  be  similar  or  identical  to 
the  shells  discussed  here.  European  fossil  epitoniids  were 
not  surveyed  because  the  literature  is  so  extensive.  Among 
the  most  important  references  consulted  on  Epitonium, 
sensu  lata  are: 

1)  world  Recent  species:  Kiener  (1838-1839);  Sowerbv 
(1844);  Nyst  (1871);  Sowerby  in  Reeve  (1873-1874); 
Tryon  (1887);  Clessin  (1896-1897);  de  Boury  (1912-1913); 
Kaicher  (1980,  1981,  1983,  the  only  really  global  con- 
tribution in  this  century,  albeit  incomplete). 

2)  American  Recent  species:  Morch  (1875a,  1875b,  1876); 
Dall  (1889);  Clench  and  Turner  (1950a-1953);  Nowell- 


Page  82 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


Figures  1-4.  Epitoniuiu  phymaiithi  liobt-rtsoii,  new  species.  1.  .Apertural,  2.  apical,  and  3.  basal  \ie«sof  liolot\pe.  Shell  16.9 
mm  long,  and  9.3  mm  wide.  Miami,  Florida,  ANSP  391939.  4.  Unusually  low-spired  shell  (not  a  paratype),  12,0  mm  long,  and 
8,f)  mm  wide. 


Usticke  (1959);  Keen  (1971);  Abbott  (1974);  DuShane 
(1974,  1979,  and  references  therein);  Gundaker  (1975); 
de  Jong  and  Coomans  (1988);  Espinosa  and  Fernandez 
Garces  (1990). 

3)  American  late  Cenozoic  fossil  species:  Olsson  (1916); 
Maury  (1910,  1917);  Gardner  and  Aldrich  (1919);  Pilsbry 
(1922);  Woodring  (1928,  1959);  Mansfield  (1930,  1935); 
Pilsbry  and  Olsson  (1941);  Gardner  (1947,  1948);  Olsson 
and  Harbison  (1953);  Weisbord  (1962);  Jung  (1969). 

4)  European  Recent  species:  Parenzan  (1970);  Franchini 
(1975-1976);  Nordsieck  (1982);  Bouchet  and  War6n 
(1986);  Poppe  and  Goto  (1971). 

5)  Indo-Pacific,  Japanese,  Australasian  and  South  African 
Recent  species:  Adams  ( 1 861);  McK  ill  and  Standen  (1903); 
Jousseaunie  (1911);  Ircdale  (1936);  Kerslake  (1958);  Azu- 
ma  (1962);  Macpliorson  and  Gabriel  ( 1962);  Kuroda,  Habe 
and  Oyama  (1971);  Masahito  and  Habe  (1973-1976); 
Powell  (1979);  Kilburn  (1985);  DuShane  (1988,  1990); 
Nakayama  (1991). 

An  attempt  was  made  to  count  the  ribs  on  each  whorl 
of  each  shell    The  need  ior  doing  so  was  explained  in  a 


previous  paper  (Robertson,  1983a).  Counts  on  juveniles 
can  be  different  from  those  on  adults.  Indeed,  a  rib  count 
per  whorl  in  species  of  Epitoniiim  may  increase,  sta\' 
the  same,  decrease,  or  decrease  and  then  increase  as  the 
shell  grows  in  a  species-specific  maimer.  These  ta.\onomic 
characters  have  hardly  been  used  before. 

The  major  study  by  Clench  and  Turner  (1950b-1953) 
was  published  before  epitoniids  were  found  to  live  with 
or  to  forage  for  and  feetl  on  benthic  coelenterates,  either 
as  parasites  or  predators  (Thorson,  1957;  Robert.son,  1963, 
1981,  1983b;  DuShane,  1988;  Yamashiro,  1990;  Nakay- 
ama, 1991,  etc.).  Both  species  treated  here  have  actinian 
(sea  anemone)  hosts. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

The  specimens  studied  were  assembled  during  almost 
two  and  a  halt  decades  The  two  shallow -water  species 
are  curiously  uncommon,  and  I  personally  saw  neither 
of  them  alive.  Only  empty  shells  are  available  of  E. 
pliyiiumthi.  but  there  are  a  few  £.  ivorsfoUli  in  alcohol 
(see  .ANSP  "A"  numbers  in  locality  records). 

Shells  were  studied  with  the  aid  of  a  Wild  dissecting 


R.  Robertson,  1993 


Page  83 


Figures  5-6.  Epitunium  phymanllii.  liicdnipletely  grown 
parat\  pe  shells.  5.  Only  shell  known  from  Bahamas,  juvenile. 
5  6  mm  long,  3.1  mm  wide.  6.  Subaclull  topotvpe.  10  8  mm 
long,  6.3  mm  wide. 


microscope  and  camera  lucida.  First- whorl  diameters 
were  measured  and  whorls  counted  as  advocated  by  Rob- 
ertson (1985).  The  camera  kicida  and  a  protractor  were 
used  to  measure  spire  angles  to  the  nearest  5°.  Specimen 
numbers  in  the  Specimens  E.xamined  sections  relate  to 
Tables  1  and  2. 

Rib  counts  were  made  on  decollated  shells  b\'  mea- 
suring the  mean  width  of  each  whorl  on  intact  shells  and 
then  extrapolating.  .As  landmarks,  some  ribs  were  lightK 
marked  with  a  pencil. 

Repositories  of  examined  specimens  are  indicated  by 
the  following  acronyms: 

AMNH — American  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Nev\' 
York  Cit> 

AN'SP — The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadel- 
phia 

MCZ — Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Harvard  Uni- 
versity 

USNM — National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution,  Washington,  D.C. 

SYSTEMATICS  AND  NATURAL  HISTORY 


Superfamily  Epitonioidea 

Family  Epitoniidae 

Genus  Epitoniiiin  Roding,  1798 


Figures  7-8.  Epitunium  phyinantlii.  7.  Shell  ape.\,  .showing 
a  slightly  decollated  protoconch  apex,  the  almost  smooth  pro- 
toconch,  the  protoconch  varix  (shown  as  a  line),  some  of  the 
early  teleoconch  axial  ribs,  and  fine  intervening  spiral  threads. 
Topot\pe   8.    Operculum  (exterior).  Topotype. 


Epitoniurn  phymanthi  Robertson,  new  species 
(figures  1-11,  13) 


Jong    &    Coomans,    1988:54,    fig. 


•'Epitoniurn    spec: 
276,CAira5ao. 

Shell  morphology:  Protoconch  0  42-0.50  mm  long  (ex- 
cluding immersed  base),  0  39-0.42  mm  wide,  with  3.2- 
3  4  whorls;  first  whorl  diameter  0  09-0.13  mm;  whorls 
slightK  inflated,  appearing  smooth,  shin),  microsculp- 
ture  probably  present;  terminated  with  varix;  cream- 
white,  tinged  with  amber  at  suture,  terminal  varix,  and 
columella  (seen  in  transparenc\);  some  protoconchs 
slightly  tilted  on  teleoconchs.  Entire  shell  reaching  16.9 


2? 


24 
I 


22 

I 


e 


1  I  I  I 

2  3  4  5 

WHORL    NUMBERS 


Figure  9.  Epitoniurn  plojmanthi.  Rib  frequencies  per  whorl 
on  each  w  horl.  The  horizontal  lines  show  means,  the  vertical 
stippled  boxes  show  ±  one  stanilard  deviation,  and  the  vertical 
lines  show  ranges;  n  =  sample  sizes. 


Page  84 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


Table  1.  Epitonium  phymanthi  new  species.  Mensural  and  meristic  shell  characters.  "  +  "  indicates  that  a  shell  would  lia\e  been 
larger  had  it  not  been  slightly  broken,  or  "+  +  '  badly  broken.  Specimen  21  is  the  holotype  All  remaining  specimens  are  paratypes 
except  specimen  28,  which  was  not  included  in  figure  9  because  of  the  high  rib  counts. 


Speci- 
men 

Length 

(mm) 

Width 
(mm) 

Spire 
angle 

Teleoconch 
whorls 

A,\ial 

ribs  per 

whorl 

no. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

1 

2.2+ 

1.5  + 

60° 

2.5  + 

25 

29 











2 

3.1  + 

2.0+ 

55° 

3.4  + 

23 

24 

— 



— 

— 

— 

3 

3.0+ 

1.6+ 

45° 

3.2  + 

21 

23 

22 



— 

— 

— 

4 

2.3 

1.5  + 

55° 

2.8 

27 

26 





— 





5 

3,5 

2.2 

50° 

3.8 

23 

24 

28 



— 

— 



6 

4.2  + 

2.7  + 

50° 

4.3  + 

25 

24 

23 

25 

— 

— 

— 

7 

4.8 

3.1 

55° 

4.4 

28 

29 

29 

29 

— 

— 

— 

8 

5.5+ 

3.7  + 

60° 

4.7 

27 

30 

29 

33 

— 

— 

— 

9 

5.3  + 

3.3 

55° 

4.8 

25 

28 

30 

35 

— 

— 

— 

10 

7.8 

4.7 

50° 

5.6 

27 

29 

28 

36 

45 

— 

— 

11 

7.8 

4.6 

50° 

5.7 

24 

25 

27 

28 

39 

— 

— 

12 

6.7 

4.0+ 

50° 

5.3 

24 

30 

27 

31 

38 

— 

— 

13 

5.0+ 

2.3+ 

55° 

3.7  + 

24 

27 

26 

— 

— 

— 

— 

14 

8.7  + 

4.4+ 

55° 

5.3+ 

24 

— 

28 

37 

44 

— 

— 

15 

12.2+ 

3.9+ 

50° 

5.2+ 

— 

26 

25 

29 

— 

— 

— 

16 

8.6+ 

5.2+ 

50° 

5.8+ 

— 

23 

26 

36 

42 

— 

— 

17 

9.5  + 

5.2+ 

50° 

6.3+ 

24 

24 

21 

26 

32 

42 

— 

18 

11.2  + 

6.7  + 

50° 

6.4  + 

27 

28 

29 

30 

35 

45 

— 

19 

10.3  + 

5.8+ 

45° 

6.2 

22 

24 

24 

26 

31 

39 

— 

20 

11.4 

8.1 

60° 

6.2 

23 

21 

23 

26 

33 

34 

— 

21 

16.9 

9.3 

55° 

7.2 

21 

22 

21 

24 

33 

35 

38 

22 

16.6 

9.6 

65° 

7.7 

23 

24 

22 

23 

26 

34 

40 

23 

15.3+ 

8.8 

55° 

6.2 

— 

21 

25 

26 

40 

36 

— 

24 

5.6 

3.1 

45° 

5.1 

22 

25 

24 

24 

27 

— 

— 

25 

9.1  + 

5.6 

50° 

5.7  + 

— 

21 

25 

28 

— 

— 

— 

26 

16.9 

9.5 

50° 

7.8 

18 

18 

27 

30 

39 

37 

37 

27 

6.0+ + 

4.5 

— 

2.6+  + 

— 

— 

— 

34 

— 

— 

— 

28 

8.6+  + 

4.6+  + 

— 

2.8+  + 

— 

— 

39 

45 

— 

— 

— 

29 

5.9+  + 

4.1+  + 

— 

1.6+ + 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

mm  (Table  1).  Teleoconch  to  9.6  mm  wide  (including 
ribs),  with  7.8  whorls,  initially  thick,  becoming  relatively 
thin,  fragile  w  ith  increasing  shell  size.  Spire  height  vari- 
able, usually  low,  spire  angle  4.5°-65°  (mean  53°;  Table 
1).  Spire  profile  at  first  straight,  convex  on  later  whorls 
of  large  shells.  Whorls  moderately  to  strongK  inflated. 
Axial  ribs  18-45  per  whorl,  number  increasing  with  shell 
size  (figure  9;  table  1 );  ribs  thick,  low,  with  edges  rounded 
on  upper  whorls,  thinner,  higher,  wav\'  or  crested  at 
shoulder  on  later  whorls.  Apical  whorls  fully  attached  to 
preceding  whorls,  lower  whorls  slightly  detached.  Axial 
ribs  aligned,  attached  erectK  from  one  w  horl  to  the  next 
on  upper  whorls,  rib  alignment  and  attachment  decreas- 
ing with  increasing  shell  size;  ribs  on  later  whorls  rarely 
in  closely  spaced  pairs  or  bifurcating;  ribs  commonly 
curled  away  from  aperture.  P'ine,  regularK  spaced  spiral 
threads  between  ribs  on  early  whorls  (about  12  above 
suture),  later  whorls  with  irregular  threads,  smooth  or 
with  fine  incised  spiral  lines.  Basal  spiral  cord  lacking. 
L'mbilicus  narrow,  or  reduced  to  chink.  Aperture 
oblifjuely  to  roundK  o\ al  Teleoconch  color  cream  white 
or  pure  white.  Operculum  not  available. 

(Comparative  remarks:  This  new  species  differs  from  E. 
worsfoldi  Robertson  (see  below)  in  that  the  latter  species 


has  a  thicker  more  highly  spired  shell,  with  coarser,  un- 
crested,  less  numerous  ribs  (especially  on  the  last  whorl 
of  large  shells).  Epitonium  pht/nidiUhi  most  closeK  re- 
sembles species  assignetl  to  de  Bour\ 's  (1912)  "subgenus" 
Foliaceiscala  (Appendix).  The  most  closeK-  similar  spe- 
cies seem  to  be  E.  irregttlarc  (Sowerby,  1844)  from  the 
Philippines  and  Japan,  and  E.  lyirgo  (Masahito  and  Habe, 
1976)  from  Japan  (Appendix). 

Etymology:  Of  Pliijriuiulhui,  the  genus  of  sea  anemone 
host. 

Geographic  range:  SE  Florida,  the  Bahamas,  Virgin  Is- 
lands and  Grenada  (Lesser  Antilles).  Not  known  from 
I^ermuda  or  the  (Greater  Antilles. 

IVIaterial  examined:  (Table  1):  SE  Florida:  Bear  Cut, 
Miami  (25°43'N,  S0°09'  VV),  1  m,  N,  and  E,  Leeman  leg,, 
196.5,  Holotype— ANSP. 391939,  A NSP  ,391940  &  ANSP 
391941,  specimens  19-23,  Leeman  collection  1  specimen, 
Bahamas:  Dead  Man's  Reef  beach,  western  Grand  Ba- 
hama (26°34'45"N,  78°51'45"W),  S,  Bowers  leg,,  Feb, 
1981,  via  J,N,  Worslold,  ANSP  374362,  specimen  24, 
Virgin  Islands:  Lindbergh  Bav,  St,  Thomas  (18°20'N, 
64°58'W),  2  m,  MR,  Hvett  leg,,  Oct,  30,  1968,  ANSP, 


R.  Robertson,  1993 


Page  85 


Figures   10-1 1 

Topotypes. 


Epitoniuiu  phymanlhi  li\ing  in  aqi: 


specimen  26.  Hams  Bay,  St.  Croi.x  (17°47'N,  64°53'W), 
G.  Nowell-Usticke  leg.,  Feb.-March  1957,  AMNH  194365 
(Specimens  1-18,  27-29)[co-occurred  with  1  E.  wors- 
joldi].  Lesser  Antilles:  Saint  George  s  Lagoon,  Grenada 
(12°03'N,  6r45'W),  G.  Nowell-Usticke  Colin.,  AMNH 
194429,  Specimen  25.  Specimen  21  is  the  holotype.  All 
remaining  specimens  except  unnumbered  specimen  in 
the  Leeman  collection  and  specimen  28  are  paratypes. 

A  total  of  29  specimens  of  £.  phijinanthi  was  available 
for  this  study.  As  with  E.  worsfoldi,  many  of  the  shells 
are  broken. 

Natural  history:  In  1965,  Neal  and  Eleanor  Leeman  col- 
lected six  living  animals  of  £.  phijmanthi  slightly  below 
low  tide  line  at  a  rocky  area  in  Bear  Cut,  between  Vir- 
ginia Key  and  Key  Biscayne,  Miami,  Florida,  U.S.A.  All 
were  associated  with  the  actiniarian  sea  anemone  Phij- 
manthus  crucifer  (Lesueur,  1817).  The  anemones  were 
clinging  to  rock  substrata,  commonly  in  crevices,  and 
turtle  grass  (Thalassia  festudiniini  Banks  and  Solander 
ex  Konig)  rhizomes,  most  of  which  were  buried  in  sand. 
The  epitoniums  were  buried  next  to  the  Phymanthtis 


Figure  12.  t'liyiuanthus  crucijer,  the  sea  anemone  liost  ot 
Epitonium  pliijmantlii  at  Miami,  Florida.  Size  not  recorded, 
but  soniewlial  less  than  life  size.  The  anemone  colors  and  pat- 
terns vary  considerably.  Photo  Neal  Leeman. 


columns  under  their  radially  extended  oral  discs  Only 
anemones  buried  in  sand  had  E.  phijmanthi  with  them. 
A  few  clusters  of  sand-agglutinated  Epitonium  egg  cap- 
sules were  observed  but  not  studied. 

On  .'\pril  17,  1965,  a  pair  of  E.  phijmanthi  was  found 
with  one  Pliijmanthus.  On  May  12,  Ma>  30,  June  6,  and 
August  8  of  the  same  year,  single  £.  phijmanthi  were 
found  w  ith  Phijmanthns.  Unlike  a  predatory  Epitonium, 
w  Inch  swallows  its  coelenterate  prey  whole,  £.  phijman- 
thi is  a  parasite,  feeding  on  its  large  host  poK  p  without 
killing  it.  When  fully  extended,  a  large  specimen  of  Phij- 


1  1 


Figure  13.  Kpilunium  phijntantln  feeding  on  the  upper  col- 
umn of  its  sliglitj)  contractdl  sea  anemone  host  Plujmanlhus 
crucifer.  Note  the  cvtraordinariK  long  e\erted  acremijojic  pro- 
boscis Miami,  Florida  Fpitoniums,  unlike  p\  ramidellids,  lake 
tissues  for  food  rather  than  fluids.  Drawing  based  on  photo- 
graphs by  Neal  Leeman. 


Page  86 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


13 
I 


Figures  14-16.  EpHonium  worsfoldi  Robertson,  new  species. 
14.  Apertural,  15.  basal,  and  16.  apical  (at  lower  magni- 
fication) views  of  the  holotype,  18.7  mm  long,  9.1  mm  wide. 
Smith's  Point,  Grand  Bahama  Island.  ANSP  A17192. 


inanthus  crucifer  is  about  13  cm  high  and  about  13  cm 
wide,  much  larger  than  the  wentletrap. 

Epitoniums  can  vary  their  host  preferences  from  place 
to  place.  During  the  same  year  and  months,  at  the  same 
locality,  and  associated  with  the  same  species  of  sea 
anemone,  the  Leemans  collected  six  living  Epitonium 
lamellosum  (Lamarck,  1822)(ANSP  391948,  A16850)  and 
one  living  Opalia  crenata  (Linnaeus,  1758)(ANSP 
A16851).  Thus  Phijnianthus  crucifer  supports  three  par- 
asitic epitoniid  species  at  one  locality.  £,  phijmanthi  may 
or  may  not  be  specific  to  Phymanthus  elsewhere. 

Colors  and  color  patterns  of  P.  crucifer  vary  consid- 
erably. Usually,  these  anemones  are  variegated  with 
shades  of  green  or  brown.  The  white  shell  and  body  of 
E.  phijmanthi,  and  the  white  and  reddish  brown  shell 
and  nearly  white  body  of  £.  lamellosum,  make  neither 
species  cryptically  colored  with  its  host.  At  least  during 
the  day,  both  species  are  buried  in  sand  ne.\t  to  the 
anemone. 

The  Leemans  maintained  £.  phymanthi  and  E.  la- 
mellosum with  Phymanthus  crucifer  in  home  aquaria 
from  mid-April  to  mid-October,  1965  (two  E.  lamellos- 
um for  as  long  as  three  months).  Their  observations  are 
abstracted  below. 

The  external  body  coloration  of  E.  phymanthi  was 
white,  that  of  E.  lamellosum  was  white  except  for  light 
\ellowish  tentacles  that  taded  to  white  in  aquaria.  The 
fully  everted  proboscis  of  E.  phymanthi  was  at  least  four 
times  the  shell  length,  while  the  fully  extended  proboscis 
of  E.  lamellosum  was  only  slightly  longer  than  the  shell. 
Roth  species  behaved  as  if  they  locate  their  host  by  che- 


E  .   WORSFOLDI 


I 


_ 

T 


T 


T 


(III 

3  4  6  6 

WHORL    NUMBERS 


Figure  17.  Epitonium  worsfoldi,  new  species.  Rib  frequencies 
per  whorl  on  each  whorl.  The  horizontal  lines  show  means,  the 
vertical  stippled  boxes  show  ±  one  standard  deviation  and  the 
vertical  lines  show  ranges;  n  =  sample  sizes. 


motropism,  using  their  tentacles  and  slightK'  everted  pro- 
boscises as  do  two  Californian  species  (Smith,  1977;  Saio, 
1977). 

Both  E.  phymanthi  and  E.  lamellosum  were  seen  to 
feed  on  Phymanthus  columns  near  the  base  and  under 
the  oral  disc,  ingesting  column  tissues  (with  fluid?  mu- 
cus?). Anemone  tentacles  were  not  observed  to  be  at- 
tacked by  either  species.  Duration  of  feeding  in  £.  phy- 
manthi was  2-10  minutes  (animals  not  starved;  mean  of 
5  observations  ca.  4  min).  Epitonium  lamellosum  (a 
larger  species,  up  to  45  mm  shell  length)  starved  for  3- 
5  days  fed  for  45-97  minutes  (mean  of  4  observations: 
64  min.).  No  purple  secretion  was  seen  to  be  released 
from  the  pigmented  mantle  organ  b\  either  species  dur- 
ing feeding.  One  Phymanthus  sur\  ived  repeated  attacks 
by  the  two  species  for  upwards  of  one  month.  The  anem- 
one w  rithed  near  where  it  was  attacked,  and  the  column 
also  swelled.  The  anemone  reacted  least  to  E.  phymanthi, 
the  smaller,  slower  species. 

An  £.  phymanthi  with  a  shell  7  mm  long  on  August 
11  grew  to  1 1  mm  by  September  22,  a  mean  rate  of  0. 1 1 
mm /day.  Growth  initially  was  faster  (between  August 
11  and  21:  0.2  mm/day),  but  there  was  no  growth  be- 
tween September  22  and  October  5.  Another  £.  phy- 
manthi fed  and  survived  from  August  1 1  to  September 
2  without  growing  (22  days).  Growth  of  £.  lavwllosum 
was  rather  faster  and  also  erratic,  but  growth  appeared 
to  be  indeterminate  (Leeman  and  Robertson  unpub- 
lished). 

Epitonium  phymanthi  was  observed  to  move  very 
slowly  and  remain  motionless  for  long  periods  of  time. 
Epitonium  lamellosum  was  more  active.  On  several  oc- 
casions, £.  phymanthi  was  observed  following  £.  la- 
mellosum mucous  trails,  and  partially  everting  and  in- 
verting its  proboscis,  each  time  ending  by  touching  an 


R.  Robertson,  1993 


Page  87 


Figure  18.  Oral  vie«  of  either  Actinoponis  elegans  or  Hom- 
ostichanthus  duerdeni.  a  sand-dwelling  sea  anemone,  showing 
beside  it  the  holot\  pe  and  egg  capsules  of  Epiioniiim  worsfoldi 
found  with  it  A  paratype  shell  also  shows.  The  anemone  is  7,5 
cm  in  greatest  diameter.  Smith  s  Point,  Grand  liahama,  I5a- 
hamas.  Photo  Jack  N.  Worsfold. 


.¥'-:C 


Figure  19.  Li\  ing  Epitonitim  uursfoldi  near  some  of  its  sand- 
agglutinated  egg  capsules  Some  of  the  shell  ribs  are  abnormally 
bent.  .-WSP  Ai7I94.  Shell  IS  8  mm  long,  9.8  mm  wide.  Grand 
I^ahama,  Photo  Jack  N.  Worsfold. 


£.  lamcllosum.  On  one  occasion,  an  E.  laincllosiun  ap- 
proached an  £.  phijmanthi  in  the  same  \va) .  Once,  in- 
dividuals of  the  two  species  remained  aperture  to  ap- 
erture for  about  one  hour,  with  the  four  tentacles  curled 
around  each  other. 

Groups  of  egg  capsules  with  £.  phijmanthi  were  found 
in  early  May,  early  June,  and  early  October.  After  36 
days  in  isolation,  one  £.  phijmanthi  had  two  groups  of 
fresh  egg  capsules  attached  to  it,  indicating  a  capacit> 
for  sperm  storage. 

A  small  crab  killed  an  £.  phijmanthi  with  a  shell  10 
mm  long.  Three  other,  larger  animals  died  from  un- 
known causes. 

Epitonitim  worsfoldi  Robertson,  new  species 
(figures  14-19) 

?Turbo  principalis  Pallas.  1774:  33,  pi  3,  figs.  5-6.  No  localit\ 
Nonwn  (hdritim.  This  species  might  not  be  large  if  the 
figures  are  enlarged.  The  spire  angle  (if  accurately  drawn  lis 
30°-35° 

?"Sca/a  principa/is  (Pallas)":  Morch,  1875a.  1875b,  1876.Tortola. 
British  Virgin  Islands.  ProbabK  not  of  Pallas. 

Unidentified.  Huber,  1982:  202,  2  figs.  S  of  Balmoral  Island, 
Nassau,  Bahamas.  Reported  to  be  I  5/8"  long  (=41  mm). 

"Epitonium  principaUs  (Pallas,  1774)":  Paschall,  1986:66,  figs, 
la  and  b.  Next  to  a  sea  anemone,  tureen  Turtle    'Ke\" 


[Ca>  ],  .-\f)aco,  Bahamas.  Not  of  Pallas  Reported  to  be  1.75 

inches  long  (=  44  mm). 
:*£.  principale  "Roding,  1798":  de  Jong  &  Coomans,  1988:54, 

fig.  275.  "Rather  common  in  Curai^ao  and  Arutia.     Too 

few  axial  ribs. 
?"£.  fricici  (Dall):  Espinosa  anil  Fernandez  CJarces  (1990:6), 

probabl)  not  of  Dall;  three  small  shells  from  Bah!a  Cien- 

fuegos,  C'uba,  the  longest  3.8  mm. 

Shell  morphology:  Protoconch  0.52-0.54  mm  long  (ex- 
eluding  immersed  base),  0.40-0.43  mm  wide,  with  4.1- 
4.2  whorls;  first  whorl  diameter  0.12  mm;  whorls  slightly 
inflated;  microsculpture  as  in  £.  alhidiim  (Robertson, 
19S3b);  \\  hite,  with  pale  brown  at  suture,  terminal  varix. 
Entire  shell  attaining  25.3  mm  (Table  2).  Teleoconch  to 
11.5  mm  wide  (including  ribs),  with  ca.  8.8  thin,  fragile 
whorls.  Spire  high,  spire  angle  35°-50°  (mean  44°);  spire 
profile  convex,  rareK  straight  or  initialK  concave;  whorls 
moderately  inflated.  Axial  ribs  thick,  low  on  upper  w  horls, 
thinner,  higher,  upright  or  recurved  without  subsutural 
or  shoulder  cresting  (except  remnants  from  breakage)  on 
later  whorls;  ninnbering  16-21  on  all  but  first  and  last 
whorls  large  shells  (23  ribs  on  last  whorl  of  8.8+  whorl 
shell),  with  ribs/  whorl  initially  decreasing  then  increas- 
ing with  shell  size  (figure  17);  axial  ribs  on  successive 
whorls  usually  attached,  attachments  erect,  rarely  offset 
away  from  aperture  on  lower  w  horls;  rarely  ,  all  ril«  bent 
medialK   after  an  injury   (figure  19).  Suture  present  in 


Page  88 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


Table  2.    Epitonium  worsfoldi  new  species.  Mensural  and  meristic  shell  characters.  "  +  "  indicates  that  a  shell  would  have  been 
larger  had  it  not  been  slightK  broken,  or  "+  +     bailK  broken   Specimen  '57  is  the  liojotNpe 


Speci- 
men 

Length 

Width 

S[)ire 

Teleoconth 

Axial  ribs 

per  whorl 

no. 

(mm) 

(mm) 

angle 

whorls 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

1 

17.94- 

8.9-1- 

45° 

7.34- 

— 

— 

21 

18 

18 

18 

18 



2 

18.8 

9.8 

45° 

8.0 

20 

20 

19 

18 

18 

19 

19 

20 

3 

9.4 

5.3 

40° 

6.5 

20 

20 

20 

19 

19 

20 

— 

— 

4 

8.8 

5.4 

45° 

6.6 

22 

21 

20 

20 

21 

21 

— 

— 

5 

— 

4.7 

— 

— 

19 

19 

19 

18 

19 

20 

— 

— 

6 

— 

— 

— 

3.3 

23 

21 

21 

20 

— 

— 

— 

— 

7 

— 

— 

— 

— 

20 

bS 

17 

18 

17 

18 

— 

— 

8 

— 

11.3-f 

— 

ca.  8,8 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

20 

9 

22.1 

10.3 

40° 

8,3 

20 

20 

19 

19 

18 

18 

18 

18 

10 

15.6-1- 

7.7 

.35° 

7.2 

— 

19 

19 

20 

19 

17 

17 



11 

12.5 

5.9-1- 

40° 

6.84- 

19 

19 

19 

18 

19 

20 

— 



12 

17.2 

8.0 

40° 

7.64- 

— 

— 

21 

20 

19 

19 

19 



13 

14.3 

7.2 

40° 

7.1 

— 

— 

20 

19 

19 

19 

19 



14 

19.7-H 

9.9 

40° 

8.2 

— 

— 

19 

19 

19 

19 

19 

20 

15 

19.6-t- 

9.7 

40° 

8.0 

— 

21 

20 

20 

20 

20 

21 

19 

16 

19.7 

9.6 

40° 

7.8 

— 

20 

18 

17 

18 

18 

18 

— 

17 

14.9 

8.1 

40° 

7.3 

— 

20 

19 

18 

18 

18 

19 

— 

18 

18.3 

9.5 

45° 

7,9 

— 

17 

18 

18 

17 

18 

18 

— 

19 

19.2 

9.2 

40° 

8,1-H 

— 

— 

21 

19 

19 

19 

19 

23 

20 

4.4 

2.4 

4(J° 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

21 

6.9 

3.8 

40° 

5.4 

— 

20 

18 

19 

19 

— 

— 

— 

22 

25.3 

11.5 

45° 

8.1 

— 

19 

19 

19 

19 

20 

20 

21 

23 

15.6 

8.2 

4.5° 

8,0 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

24 

21.5-1- 

9.0-H 

40° 

7,9 

— 

— 

19 

17 

17 

17 

17 

— 

25 

18.9-1- 

9.2-H 

40° 

7.8 

— 

— 

— 

19 

19 

19 

— 

— 

26 

17.7-1- 

9.3 -H 

45° 

7.8 

— 

— 

20 

21 

20 

20 

21 

— 

27 

13.9-1- 

6.4  4- 

40° 

6.94- 

— 

— 

18 

18 

18 

— 

— 

— 

28 

19.4 

9.6 

4.5° 

7.7 

— 

— 

20 

20 

20 

20 

20 

— 

29 

15.0-F 

7.54- 

45° 

7.1 

— 

20 

18 

18 

17 

17 

17 

— 

30 

18.6-h 

10.0 

40° 

7.2 

— 

— 

— 

18 

18 

18 

19 

19 

31 

20.2 

10.7 

45° 

8.2 

— 

18 

18 

18 

18 

18 

18 

19 

32 

18.8-1- 

10.0 

4.5° 

8.0 

— 

— 

18 

18 

18 

18 

18 

19 

33 

■22A  + 

— 

4.5° 

8,3 

— 

— 

20 

20 

20 

20 

19 

21 

34 

17  1 

8,4 

45° 

7.74- 

— 

— 

18 

17 

18 

18 

18 

19 

35 

12.9 

7.2 

45° 

7.1 

— 

17 

17 

18 

— 

18 

18 

18 

36 

10.2-1- 

4.74- 

50° 

5.54- 

— 

— 

17 

17 

19 

18 

— 

— 

37 

18.7 

9.1 

4.5° 

7.8 

— 

19 

19 

20 

20 

19 

20 

— 

38 

e,.o+  + 

2  94-4- 

4.5° 

5.64-4- 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

— 

iiitcr-rib  areas  of  uppermost  whorls;  middle,  lower  whorls 
slightly  detached.  Areas  between  a.xial  ribs  with  faint, 
irregidarly-spaced,  incised  spiral  lines;  axial  growth  lines 
present,  Bod\  whorl  v\  ithout  basal  spiral  cord  limbilical 
chink  narrovN  (rarely  almost  closed).  Colunieiiar  callus 
thin  or  thick,  thinnest  medially,  not  conforming  to  un- 
derlying ribs.  Columellar  chinks  present.  Aperture 
roundly  oval.  Teleoconch  color  pale  tan,  cream-white, 
pure  white  (when  bleached?).  Operculum  ])aucis|)iral, 
growth  wrinkles  present,  pale  amber. 

Comparative  remarks:  Epitonium  worsjolili  most  close- 
ly resembles  species  in  the  de  Boury  "subgenera"  Hy- 
aloscala  [1889],  Umiscala  [\909],  aiuj  rapyriscala  [\m)9] 
(see  Appendbx)  as  di.scu.ssed  in  Kilburn  ( 1985).  The  shell 
of  £,  worsfoldi  most  closely  resembles  /.',  kraiissi  (Nyst, 


1871)  of  South  Africa  and  E.  me/ior  (Mel vill  andStanden, 
1903)  of  the  northern  Arabian  Sea  (see  Appendix). 

Etymology:  Named  for  Jack  Nigel  Worsfold,  indefati- 
gable naturalist  and  friend. 

Geographic  range:  Bahamas,  northern  Cuba,  and  Puerto 
Rico.  Not  known  troni  Bermuda,  Florida,  or  the  Lesser 
Antilles. 

Material  examined:  (Table  2):  Bahamas:  Fleming  Road 
iH'uch,  Mosquito  Point,  8  km  SE  of  West  End.  (Irand 
I5ahama  (26°37'30"N,  78°54'00"W),  J.N.  Worsfold  leg., 
ca.  1976,  ANSP  370051,  specimen  33-  Smith's  Point, 
Grand  Bahama  (26°31'N,  78°37'W),  1  m,  1  living  under 
Stich()(lu(tyl(i  ["Stoichactis"]  heliatUhus,  1  large,  with 
egg  capsules,  li\  ing  under  either  an  :\ctinoporus  clegans 


R.  Robertson,  1993 


Page  89 


or  Homostichanlhns  ducrdeni  (Figure  18),  J.N.  VVors- 
fold  leg.,  August  1985,  ANSP  A17192,  Holotype.  ANSP 
A17193,  specimens  35,  37.— SW  of  Sharp  Rocks  Point, 
near  Peterson's  Cay,  S  coast  central  Grand  Bahama 
(26°33'45"N,  78°33'30"\V),  1  in,  2  juveniles  living  with 
egg  capsules  under  Stichodactyla.  J.N.  Worstold  leg., 
June  1984,  ANSP  A 17194.— Cold  Rock,  S.  coast  central 
Crand  Bahama  (26°36'15"N,  78°22'15"W),  1  m,  2  ju- 
veniles living  under  Stichodactyla.  J.N.  Worsfold,  leg., 
June  1984,  ANSP  A17195. — Treasure  Cay  and  vicinity, 
Abaco,  12  shells,  C.  Redfern  leg.,  Redfern  collection, 
specimens  7,  23-32. — W  coast  N  end  Elbow  (Little 
Guana)  Cay,  off  NE  Abaco  (26°33'00"N,  76°56'45"W)  K. 
A.  Robertson  leg.  ca.  1954,  ANSP  359100,  specimen  16. — 
Wood  Cay.  Schooner  ("ays,  W  of  S  Eleuthera,  M 
McNeilus  leg.,  Dec.  1980,  McNeilus  collection,  specimen 
1.— North  East  Point,  Arthurstown,  Cat  Island  (24°38'N, 
75°3S'W),  1  broken  shell  u  ith  an  £.  albidum.  W.J.  Clench 
and  H.D.  Russell  leg.,  1936,  MCZ  107820,  specimen  36.— 
Bahamas  unlocalized,  .ANSP  uncatalogued,  specimen  34. 
Cuba:  NW  coast.  Oasis  Beach,  Via  Blanca  Highway  km 
28,  Matanzas  (23°11'N,  82°04'W),  C.J.  Finlay  leg.  Feb. 
1959,  Finlay  collection,  specimen  15. — Same,  km  27 
(23°11'N,  82°05'W),  C.J.  Finlay,  leg.,  1951-1956,  Finlay 
collection,  specimens  5,9,10,11,  ANSP  359101,  specimens 
13,14.  Puerto  Rico;  Punta  Ostiones,  7  km  S  of  Punta 
Guanajibo,  W  coast,  1  shell,  April  22,  1949,  3  shells.  May 
22,  1949,  G.L.  Warmke,  leg.,  ANSP,  specimens  3-4,  17- 
18. — Ramey  Air  Force  Base,  NW  coast,  A.  Phares,  leg., 
ANSP,  specimen  19. — Pinones  Beach,  8-10  km  E  of  San 
Juan,  NE  coast  (18°26.8'N,  65°55.7'W),  Mrs.  D.  Hum- 
phrey leg.,  1970,  Finlay  collection,  specimen  8.  Virgin 
Islands:  Hams  Bay,  St.  Croix  (17°47'N,  64°53'W),  with 
21  £.  plujmanthi  shells,  Feb. -March,  1957,  G  Nowell- 
Usticke  leg.  AMNH  194365,  specimen  38.  Specimen  37 
is  the  holotype.  All  remaining  specimens  except  specimen 
34  are  paratypes. 

A  total  of  38  specimens  of  £.  worsfoldi  was  available 
for  study.  Of  these,  6  were  collected  alive:  2  large  spec- 
imens (the  smaller  the  holotype),  2  juveniles,  1  with  the 
dried  body  deep  in  the  shell,  and  1  with  the  operculum 
but  no  bod\ .  The  last  2  and  most  of  the  remaining  shells 
were  collected  from  beach  drift. 

Many  of  the  beach  shells  are  in  poor  condition.  The 
fairly  fragile  shell,  predators  (crabs?  fish?),  and  wave 
action  presumabK  are  responsible.  Out  of  the  38  shells, 
only  1  has  an  intact  protoconch. 

Natural  history:  At  Grand  Bahama,  this  species  was  found 
alive  three  times  with  Stichodactyla  hclianthus  (Ellis  and 
Solander,  1786),  the  preferred  host  also  of  Epitonium 
albidum  (Orbigny,  1842)(Robertson,  1983b)  and  an  oc- 
casional host  of  Epitonium  lamellosum.  Like  £.  albi- 
dum, E.  worsfoldi  was  under  the  broad  oral  disc,  next 
to  the  column,  in  sand.  The  holotype  of  E.  worsfoldi  was 
collected  with  an  anemone  that  was  either  Actinoporus 
elegans  Duchassaing,  1850  or  Homostichanthus  ducr- 
deni Carlgren,  1900,  a  sand-dweller  (Figure  18).  Feeding 
(parasitism)  on  the  anemones  was  not  observed  but  must 
occur.  The  sand-agglutinated  egg  capsules  are  like  those 


of  £.  albidum  (Figure  19).  The  bathymetric  range  is 
0-2  m. 

CONCLUSIONS 

The  data  in  this  paper  are  believed  to  warrant  description 
of  the  two  new  Recent  western  Atlantic  species.  Their 
fossil  ancestors  seem  not  to  be  known  in  the  Americas. 
As  documented  in  the  Appendix,  the  most  similar  Recent 
shells  appear  to  occur  in  Ja|3an  and  South  .Africa. 

It  will  be  noted  in  the  .Appendix  that  the  23  species 
have  been  assigned  to  a  variety  of  genera  and  "subgen- 
era" (many  of  the  latter  named  by  de  Boury).  Epitonium 
worsfoldi  has  characteristics  of  three  of  these  "subgen- 
era combined.  Epitoniid  genera  and  subgenera  need  to 
be  much  more  broadly  based. 

It  is  surprising  that  two  such  large,  shallow  water  spe- 
cies in  a  well-collected  area  should  have  remained  un- 
de.scribed  until  now.  The\  show  the  continuing  role  that 
amateurs  play  in  collecting,  observing,  photographing, 
and  providing  material  for  systematic  and  biological 
studies  in  museums  and  marine  stations.  Amateurs  not 
onl\  hnd  undescribed  species  on  rare  occasions  but,  per- 
haps more  u.sefull\,  they  can  also  make  aquarium  ob- 
servations such  as  those  of  the  Leemans  reported  here. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

Most  of  the  specimens  were  collected  b\  amateurs,  and 
AMNH  in  the  1970's  became  the  first  museum  to  acces- 
sion good  specimens  of  one  of  the  two  species  (from  the 
Nowell-Usticke  Collection).  Other  amateurs  who  con- 
tributed most  to  the  discoveries  by  providing  specimens, 
data,  and  photographs  are  Neal  and  Eleanor  Leeman 
(formerly  of  Miami,  Florida),  C.  John  Finlay  (formerly 
of  Cuba),  and  Jack  N.  Worsfold  (formerly  of  the  Ba- 
hamas). Worsfold's  Grand  Bahama  collection  is  now  at 
ANSP.  Dr.  Frederick  M.  Baver  identified  the  Phyman- 
thus,  and  Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore  helped  the  Leemans  in 
various  other  ways.  Dr.  Norman  D.  Paschall  and  Helen 
DuShane  were  helpful  in  providing  information.  Dr. 
Daphne  Gail  Fautin  identified  the  Actinoporus  or  Hom- 
ostichanthus from  figure  18  (no  specimen  was  kept).  The 
curators  of  the  mollusk  collections  at  MCZ,  AMNH,  and 
USNM  helped  by  providing  access  to  their  collections 
and  making  loans.  Other  persons  who  helped  with  the 
loan  or  gift  of  specimens  are  Dr.  Marvin  R.  Hyett,  Mrs. 
Garwin  (Marilee)  McNeilus,  Amy  Phares,  Colin  Redfern, 
and  Germaine  L.  Warmke.  Mary  Fuges  inked  figures  7, 
8,  and  13.  Harriet  Robertson  calculated  the  mensural 
data  and  inked  figures  9  and  17.  Colin  Redfern,  Dr  Gary 
Rosenberg,  Jack  N.  Worsfold,  and  two  helpful  reviewers 
read  various  drafts  of  the  manuscript. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Abbott,  R.T.    1974.    American  seashells,  2nd  ed  \'an  Nnstrand 

Reinliold,  New  York,  etc.,  663  pp.,  24  pLs 
.■\danis,  A.    1861.    On  the  Scalidae  or  "wenlletraps    of  the  Sea 


Page  90 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


ot  Japan;  with  descriptions  of  some  new  species  .■\nnals 
and  Magazine  of  Natural  Hi.story  (3)8:479-484. 

.\zunia.  M  1962  Descriptions  of  five  new  species  of  Japanese 
Kpitonlidae,  N'eniis:  The  Japanese  journal  of 
Malacology  22(2):  1. 50- 1. -35,  (i  figs. 

Boucfiet,  P.  and  A.  Waren.  1986.  Revision  of  the  northeast 
.Atlantic  bathyal  and  abyssal  .Aclididae,  Eiilimi- 
dae.Epitoniidae  (Mollusca,  Gastropoda).  Bollettino  Mala- 
cologico  Supplemento  2299-576 

Boury,  E.  de.  1912-1913.  Description  de  Scalidae  nouveaux 
ou  pen  conniis.  Journal  de  (x)nchvliologie  60(2):87-107, 
pi.  7  (1912).  (3):169-196,  pi.  8  (1913),  (4):269-322,  pis.  9- 
11  (1913). 

Clench,  W.J.  and  H.D.  Turner.  19.50a.  The  western  Atlantic 
marine  mollusks  described  by  C.B.  Adams.  Occasional  Pa- 
pers on  Mollusks,  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology,  Har- 
vard L'niversity  l(15):233-403. 

C;lench,  VV.J.  and  R  D  Turner  19.50b.  The  genera  Stlien- 
orytis.  Cirsotrcma,  Acirsa,  Opalia  and  Ainaea  in  the  west- 
ern Atlantic.  Johnsonia  2(29):221-246. 

Clench,  W.J.  and  R.D.  Turner.  1951.  The  genus  EpUonium 
in  the  western  Atlantic.  Part  1.  Johnsonia  2(.30):249-288. 

(;lench,  W.J.  and  R  D  Turner  1952  The  genera  Epituniiirn 
(Part  II),  Dt'prci^siscala.  Cylinilrisccila,  Nystiella  and  So- 
Ititiscala'ui  the  western  .Mlantic,  Johnsonia  2(31  );289-356. 

Clench,  W.J.  and  R.D.  Turner.  1953.  The  genera  Epitonium. 
Opalia  and  Cylindriscala  in  the  western  Atlantic  [supple- 
ment]. Johnsonia  2(32):36I-363. 

Clessin,  S.  [189fi-]1897.  Die  Familie  der  Scalariidae.  In: 
Svstematisches  C'onchvlien-Cabinet  von  Martini  und 
CheriHiitz  [2nd.  ed],  Niirnberg,  Rand  2,  Alitheilung  13:1- 
76,  18  pis. 

Dall,  W.H.  1889.  Report  on  the  Mollu.sca.  Part  II.  Gastropoda 
and  Scaphopoda.  Reports  on  the  results  of  dredging  in 
the  Gulf  of  Mexico  .  .  .  and  in  the  Caribbean  Sea  .  .  .  by 
the  U.S.  coast  survey  steamer  "Blake".  .  .  .  Bulletin  of  the 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology  at  Harvard  College  18: 
1-492,  pis.  10-40, 

DuShane.  H.  1970.  Two  new  Epiloniidae  from  the  Galapagos 
Islands  (Mollusca:  Gastropoda).  The  Veliger  12(3):330- 
332,  pi.  51. 

DuShane,  H.  1974.  The  Panamic-Galapagan  Epitoniidae.  The 
\  eliger  16  Supplement:  1-84,  154  figs. 

DuShane,  H  1979.  The  family  Epitoniidae  (Mollusca:  Gas- 
tropoda)in  the  northeastern  Pacific  The  X'eliger  22(2):91- 
134,  68  figs. 

DuShane,  H,  1983.  New  developments  in  the  famiU  Epito- 
niidae. The  Western  Society  of  Malacologists  Annual  Re- 
port 15:10.  Abstract. 

DuShane,  H.  1988.  CJeographical  distrihiUmii  ol  soiiu-  Epi- 
toniidae (Mollusca:  Gastropoila)  associated  uilli  lungiid 
corals.  The  Nautilus  1()2(  1  ):.30-35. 

DuShane,  H  1990  Hawaiian  i;[)itiinii(iac  Ilauaiian  Shell 
News  Supplement  1:1-17. 

Espinosa,  J.  and  R.  Fernandez  Garces  1990  La  familia  Ep- 
itoniidae (Mollusca:  Gastropoda)  en  Cuba.  Poeyana,  Ac- 
ademia  de  Ciencias  de  C;uba  No.  404:1-13,  8  figs. 

Franchini,  D.A.  1975-1976.  FaiTiilia  Epitoniidae  in  the  Med- 
iterranean Sea.  LaConchiglia[Roine|[lll|7(79  80):10-I3 
(1975),  [IV]  (81/82):6-7  (19751,  [■'IN'"  =  V]  8(85/86): 
3(1976). 

Gardner,  J  1947  The  molhiscan  fauna  ol  the  ,\luin  Bluff 
Group  of  Florida.  Part  VIII  Ctenobranchia  (remainder), 
Aspidobranchia,  and  Scaphopoda.  United  States  .  .  .  Geo- 


logical Surve\  Professional  Paper  !42-H:ii  +  493-656,  pis. 

52-62. 
Gardner,  J      1948      Mollusca  from  the  Miocene  and   Lower 

Pliocene  of  \irgiiiia  and  North  Carolina,  Part  2.  Scapho- 

potla  and  Gastropoda  United  States  .    .  Geological  Survex 

Professional  Paper  I99-B;iii,  179-310,  pis.  24-38. 
Gardner,  J. A.  and  T.H.  Aldrich.     1919.     Mollusca  from  the 

Upper  Miocene  of  South  Carolina  with  descriptions  of  new 

species.  Proceedings  of  the  Academv  of  .Natural  Sciences 

of  Philadelphia  71:17-53,  4  pis. 
Gundaker,  G,G.    1975.    Some  Epitoniidae  of  the  U.S.  ea.st  coast 

and  Gulf  of  Mexico.  La  C^onchiglia  [Rome]  7  (73/74):I5- 

17,(75/76):  10-11,  14-15,  (77/78):14-19,  (79/80):12. 
(Huber,  L]    1982,    Who  am  I?  [Epitonium  sp  J  Of  Sea  and 

Shore  I2(4):202,  2  figs, 
Iredale,  T.    1936,    Australian  molhiscan  notes.  .No.  2.  Records 

of  the  Australian  Museiuu  19(5):267-340,  pis.  20-24. 
Jong,  KM,  tie  and  HE.  Coomans,     1988.    Marine  gastropods 

from  Curasao,  .\ruba  and  Bonaire.  Brill,  Leiden,  etc.,  261 

pp.,  47pls. 

Jf)usseaume,  [F]     191 1     Fanne  malacologitiue  de  la  Mer  Rouge. 

Scalidae    Memoires  de  la  Societe  Zoologiijue  de  France 

24:180-246,  pLs.  5-7. 
Jung,  P.    1969     Miocene  and  Pliocene  mollusks  from  Trinidad. 

Bulletins  of  American  Paleontology  55(247):293-657,  pis. 

13-60. 
Kaicher,  S.D.     1980-1983.     Card  Catalogue  of  World-Wide 

Shells.   Pack   #  23,   Epitoniidae  Part  I  (1980).   Pack   # 

30,Epitoniidae  Part  II  (1981).  Pack  #  35,  Epitoniidae  III 

(1983). 
Keen,  A.M.     1971,     Sea  shells  of  tropical  West  .Xmerica.  ,  .  . 

2nd  ed,  Stanford  University  Press,  Stanford,  California, 

xiv  +  1064  pp,,  22  pis, 
Kerslake,  J      19.58.    A  new  Epitonium  from  eastern  Australia. 

Proceedings  of  the  Royal  Zoological  Society  of  New  South 

Wales,  ■T956-57":157-158. 
Kiener,  L.C.    1838-1839,    Genre  Scalaire.  (Sea/aria,  Lam.)  In: 

Species    general    et    iconographie    des    cocpiilles    vi- 

vantes     .   Paris.  10:1-22.  7  pk 
Kilburn,  IVN,     1972,    Taxonomic  notes  on  South  .\trican  ma- 
rine Mollusca  (2),  w  ith  the  description  ol  new  species  and 

subspecies  of  Conns,  Nassarins.  \'exillum  and  Dcmoulia. 

Annals  of  the  Natal  Museum  21(2)391-437. 

Kilburn.  R.N,  1985,  The  family  Epitoniidae  (Mollu,sca:  Gas- 
tropoda) in  southern  .Africa  and  Mozambique  Annals  of 
the  Natal  Museum  27(1):  239-337. 

Kuroda,  T  ,  T  Ilabe  and  K.  Oyama.  1971.  The  sea  shells  ot 
Sagami  Bay  collected  by  his  Majesty  the  Emperor  of  Japan. 
Maruzen.fokyo.  xix  -I-  7^1  +  489  ~l-  51  pp  ,  121  pis.  1 
fold-out  map. 

Macpherson,  J  H  and  C  J  (Jabriel,  1962  Marine  molluscs  of 
N'ictoria.  Melbourne  University  Press;  National  Museum 
ol  X'ictoria  Handbook  No,  2,  xv  -I-  475  pp. 

Mansfield,  VV,(;,  1930  Miocene  gastropods  and  scaphopods 
of  the  (Choctaw  hatchee  Formation  of  Florida  Florida  State 
Geological  Survey  Bulletin  3:1-189. 

Mansfield,  W.G  1935.  New  Miocene  gastropods  and  scapho- 
pods Irom  .\laqua  Oeek  X'alley,  Florida  State  of  Florida 
Department  of  Conservation  Geological  Bulletin  12:1-64. 

Masahito  ( I'rinte)  and  T  Habe  1973,  .V  new  epiloniid  species 
Ironi  Japan,  \  cniis  The  jap;inese  journ;il  of  Malacology 
31(4):1.).5-1.36, 

Masahito  (Prince)  and  I'  H.ibc  I  H7.5  S\sU'malu-  stiub  ot 
Japanese  Epitoniidae  II   iMolluscal    Bullcliii  ol   the  Na- 


R.  Robertson,  1993 


Page  91 


tional  Science  Museum  [Tokyo],  ser.  A  (Zool)  1(4)191- 
194. 

Masahito  (F'riiice)  and  T  Hahe,  197(1  S\steniatic  stud)  ol 
Japanese  Epitoniidae  (III),  Bulletin  of  the  National  Science 
Museum  [Tokyo],  ser.  A  (Zool.)  2(3):169-174. 

Maur\,  C:  J  1910.  New  Oligocene  shells  from  Florida  Bul- 
letins of  American  Paleontology  4(21):  121-168,  9  pis 

Maury,  C.J.  1917.  Santo  Domingo  type  sections  and  fossils 
Bulletins  of  .American  Paleontolog\  5(29)  1-251,  39  pis, 

Melvill,  J  C  and  R,  Standen.  1903  The  genus  Scala  (Klein) 
Humphrey,  as  represented  in  the  Persian  Gulf,  (Julf  of 
Oman,  and  North  Arabian  Sea,  with  descriptions  of  new 
species.  Journal  of  Conchology  10:340-351,  pi.  7. 

Miirch,  O.A.L.  1875a.  Synopsis  familiae  Scalaridarum  Indi- 
arum  occidentalium.  Oversigt  over  V'estindiens  Scalarier 
Videnskabelige  Meddelelser  fra  den  naturhistoriske  For- 
ening  i  Kjiihenluuii  for  Aaret  1874  (Tredie  Aartis,  sjette 
Aargang):250-268, 

Morch,  O.A.L.  1875b,  Ssnopsis  molluscorum  niarinorum  lu- 
diarum  nccidentalivnn.  Malakozoologische  Blatter  fiir  1874 
und  1875  22:142-184. 

Morch,  O.A.L.  1876.  A  descriptive  catalogue  of  the  Scalidae 
of  the  West  India  Islands.  Journal  of  the  Acadenn  ol 
Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  (2)8:189-207,  pi.  29. 

Nakayama,  T.  1991.  A  nev\  cpitoniitl  species  from  the  Pacific 
coast  of  the  Kii  Peninsula,  Japan,  The  Vdiger  34(1):88- 
90. 

Nordsieck,  F.  1982.  Die  europiiischen  Meeres-Gehause- 
schnecken  (Prosobranchia)  vom  Eismeer  bis  Kap\erden, 
Mittelmeer  und  Schwarzes  Meer.  2nd  ed.  F'ischer,  Stutt- 
gart, New  York,  .\ii  +539  pp.,  108  pis. 

Nowell-l'stickc,  G.W.  1959  A  check  list  of  the  marine  shells 
of  St.  Croix  U.S.  Virgin  Islands.  .  .  .  Private!)  publisheil, 
Christiansted,  St.  C'roi\,  Virgin  Islands,  vi  -I-  90  pp.,  4pls, 

Nyst,  H.  1871.  Tableau  synoptique  et  synonymique  des  es- 
peces  vivantes  et  fossiles  du  genre  Scalaria.  .  .  .  Memoires 
de  la  Societe  Malacologique  de  Belgique  6:77-147,  pi  5 

Olsson,  A. [A]  1916.  New  Miocene  fossils.  Bulletins  ol  Amer- 
ican Paleontology  5(27):  1-32,  3  pis. 

Olsson,  A. A  and  A.  Harbison.  1953.  Pliocene  Mollusca  of 
southern  Florida  w  ith  special  reference  to  those  from  North 
Saint  Petersburg.  ,  .  .  The  Academy  of  Natural  .Sciences  oi 
Philadelphia  Monograph  8:i-v,  1-457,  65  pis, 

Pallas,  PS  1774  Tcslacea  quaedam  rariora  In  Spicilegia 
Zoologica,  ,  ,  .  Berlin,  fasc.  10:32-34,  pi,  3, 

Parenzan,  P.  1970  Carta  d'identita  delle  eonchiglie  del  Med- 
iterraneo.  Vol.  I.  Gasteropodi.  BiosTaras,  Taranto,  283pp  , 
53  pis. 

Paschall,  N.D.  1986.  Lost  and  found;  Atlantic  "Precious  Wen- 
tletrap.  Conchologists  ol  .America  Bulletin  14(4)  6(S, figs 
la  and  b 

Paschall,  N'D,  1987,  Research  results:  one  species  worldwide  :■ 
Epitonium  hlainci/zelebnri.  Conchologists  of  America 
Bulletin  15(1):  13-14,  2  figs. 

Pilsbry,  HA.  1922.  Revision  of  W.M.  Gabb's  Tertiary  M<il- 
lusca  of  Santo  Domingo.  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  ol 
Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  73:305-435,  pis.  16-47 

Pilsbry,  HA.  and  A. A.  Olsson.  1941  A  Pliocene  fauna  from 
western  Ecuador,  Proceedings  of  the  Academy  of  Natural 
Sciences  ol  Philadelphia  93: 1-79,  19  pis,  +  1  unnumbered, 

Poppe,  G  T,  and  V.  Goto  1991  European  seashells  \'ol  I 
Hemmen,  Wiesbaden,  Germany,  359  pp.,  40  pis 

P(.uell.  A  W'  B  1979.  New  Zealand  Mollusca  .  .  C:ollins, 
Auckland,  etc.,  .\iv  +  500  pp.,  82  pis. 

Robertson,  R,    1963,    Wentletraps  (Epitoniidae)  feeding  on  sea 


anemones  and  corals.   Proceedings  of  the  Malacological 
Society  of  London  35(2-3):51-(i3,  pis,  5-7, 

Robertson,  R.  1970.  Review  of  the  predators  anil  parasites  of 
stony  corals,  with  special  reference  to  symbiotic  proso- 
branch  gastropods.  Pacific  Science  24(l):43-54. 

Robertson,  R.  1981  ["1980"].  Epitonium  millecostatum  and 
Coralliophilu  clathrala.  two  prosobranch  gastropods  sym- 
biotic with  Indo-Pacific  I'alythoa  (Coelenterata:Zoanthi- 
dae).  Pacific  Science  34(1):  I -17. 

Robertson,  R.  1983a.  A.xial  shell  rib  counts  as  systematic  char- 
acters in  Epitonium.  The  Nautilus  97(3):1 16-1 18, 

Robertson,  R,  1983b.  Observations  on  the  life  histor\  of  the 
v\entletrap  Epitonium  alhidum  in  the  West  Indies.  Amer- 
ican Malacological  Bulletin  1:1-12. 

Robertson,  R.  1985.  Archaeogastropod  biology  and  the  sys- 
tematics  of  the  genus  Triculia  (Trochacea:  Tricoliidae)  in 
the  Indo- West-Pacific.  Monographs  of  Marine  Mollusca 
No.  3:1-1()3, 

Robertson,  R,  and  T  Ilabe  19(i5  Alcxania  replaces  Habea 
(Epitoniidae).  The  Nautilus  78(4):  140-141. 

Rc'iding,  P  F.  1798.  Museum  Boltenianum.  .  .  .  Pars  Secun- 
da.  .  .  .  Hamburg,  viii  -I-  199  pp. 

Salo,  S  1977  Observations  on  feeding,  chemoreception  and 
toxins  in  two  species  of  Epitonium.  The  Veliger  20(2): 
168-172,  1  fig. 

Smith,  C'.R.  1977.  (chemical  recognition  of  pre\  by  the  gas- 
tropod Epitonium  tinctum  (Gar[XTiler.  1864)  The  Veliger 
1 9(3  ):33 1-340. 

Smith,  E..A  1910.  On  South  African  marine  Mollusca,  with 
descriptions  of  new  species.  Annals  of  the  Natal 
Museum  2(2):  175-220,  pis.  7-8. 

So\\erb\.  (;B  II.  1844.  Monograph  of  the  genus  .Saj/nrifl  In: 
Thesaurus  Cxmchvliorum,  London,  1:83  bis- 108  bis,  pis, 
32-35, 

.Sowerb>,  GB,  II.  1873-1874.  Monograph  of  the  genus  Sca- 
luria  In:  Reeve,  L.A.,  Conchologia  Iconica.  .  .  .  London 
19.  16  pis.,  125  species  [no  pagination]. 

Souerby,  GB.  III.  1894.  Descriptions  of  twelve  new  species, 
chiefly  from  Mauritius.  Proceedings  of  the  Malacological 
Societ)  of  London  1(2)41-44,  pi   4 

Strong,  ,AM.  and  L.G.  Ilertlein.  1937.  New  species  of  Recent 
mollusks  from  the  coast  of  western  North  America.  The 
Templeton  Oocker  Expedition  of  the  C^alitornia  .Academy 
of  Sciences,  1932.  No.  35.  Proceedings  of  the  C^alifornia 
Academy  of  Sciences  (4)22(6):  159-178,  pis.  34-35 

Taki,  I  1956  Anatomical  study  on  Japanese  P^pitoniidae  (1 ). 
Epitonium,  Amaea  and  Papyriscala  Bulletin  of  the  Na- 
tional Science  Museum  (Tokyo)  3(2)(39):71-79,  pis.  13- 
17 

Thorson,  (;     1957.    Parasitism  in  the  marine  gaslropod-familv 
Scalitlae.  Vitlenskabelige  Meddelelser  fra  Dansk  naturhis- 
torisk  Forening  i  Kcibenhavn  119:55-58 
TrNon,  G.W.     1887.     Family  Scalariidae.  In:  Manual  ol  Con- 
chology. .  ..  [ser.  1]  9:49-111,  pis.  11-18. 

Warmke,  G  L.  and  R.T  .Abbott  1961.  Caribbean  sea- 
shells.  .  ,  ,  Livingston,  WyiHiewood,  Pennsylvania,  x  +  346 
pp.,  44  pis 

Weisbord,  N.E.  1962.  Late  (;enozoic  gastropods  from  north- 
ern Venezuela.  Bulletins  of  American  Paleontologv  42(193): 
1-672,  48  pis. 

Wilson,  B.R.  and  K.  Gillett,  1972,  Au.strahan  shells,  Tuttle, 
Rutland.  X'ermonl,  and  Tok\o,  168  pp,,  Ut6  pis 

Woodring,  \V,P,  1928,  Miocene  mollusks  from  Bouden,  Ja- 
maica   Part  II    Ciastropods  and  discussion  of  results.  Car- 


Page  92 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


iiegie  Iiistitiiliiiii  cil  W'.isliint^lnii  rublicalion  .38,5:i-vii,  1- 
56-4,  JOpls. 

VVoodring,  W.P.  1959.  Geology  and  paleontology  of  Clanal 
Zone  and  adjoining  parts  of  I'anania  Description  of  Ter- 
tiary molliisks  (gastropods:  \  errnflidac  to  Tliaididae). 
[United  StatesjCleological  Siir\fv  Prolessioiial  Paper  '>06- 
B:iii,  147-2.39,  pis.  24-;5S 

Yamashiro,  H.  1990.  A  wcntlelrap  i'.pitoniiini  hullatuiu  as- 
sociated with  a  coral  Sundali/lithu  robusta.  \  enus:  The 
Japanese  Journal  of  Malacology  49(4):299-305. 

APPENDIX. 

Conchological  comparisons  or  notes  on  23  species  similar 
to,  or  confused  with  Epitonhim  phijmanthi  and  E.  wors- 
foldi,  regardless  of  provenance. 

Scala  amathusia  Melvill  &  Standen,  1903:341,  pi.  7, 
fig.  1.  Kaicher,  1980:  card  2300  [Epitonium].  Gulf  of 
Oman.  Smaller  than  £.  worafuldi  (ft. 5  mm),  with  more 
whorls  (8-9)  for  size. 

Scalaria  costulata  Kiener,  1838-1839:5-6,  pi.  2,  figs. 

4.  Tryon,  1887:pl.  12,  fig.  59.  Robertson,  1963:57-58,  pi. 

5,  fig.  4.  Robertson,  1970:45  [identification  confirmed]. 
DuShane,  1988:30-32,  fig.  1  (ribs  curiously  opisthocline). 
ANSP  230639.  Red  Sea  to  Philippines.  Thought  to  be  a 
synonym  of  S  principalis  (Pallas)  by  Sowerby  (1844:88 
bis),  which  he  recorded  from  "Xipixappi,  West  Colum- 
bia." Larger  (35.3  mm);  spire  high  (spire  angle  30°); 
suture  slightly  disjunct;  up  to  28  ribs  on  last  whorl;  um- 
bilicus narrow,  deep. 

Scalaria  crassa  Sowerby,  1844:91  bis,  pi.  33,  fig.  55. 
Kaicher,  1981:  cards  3066,  3081  [Epitonium].  Philip- 
pines. Unlike  E.  ivorsfoldi,  ribs  unequal,  slightly  fewer 
(18)  at  largest  size;  may  be  spirally  brown-banded. 

Epitonium  (Limiscala)  cnjpticocorona  Kilburn,  1985: 
309-310,  figs.  79,  126.  South  Africa.  Smaller  (7  mm); 
weak  "coronation"  inside  suture;  12-19  ribs;  low  spiral 
lirae. 

Scalaria  dubia  Sowerby,  1844:90  bis,  pi.  33,  fig.  41. 
Not  Epitonium  duhium  Roding,  1798:92.  Sowerby  in 
Reeve,  1873:  species  45,  45b  wrongly  as  75b.  Tryon,  1887: 
60,  pi.  12,  figs.  67-68.  De  Boury,  1912:95-97,'  pi.  7,  fig. 
4.  Kilburn,  1985:327.  Type  species  of  Foliaceiscala  de 
Boury,  1912.  ANSP  19573  (broken);  USNM  G.177.  Aus- 
tralia, Samoa,  etc.  Larger  (37  mm);  spire  angle  45°;  like 
£.  phymanthi  but  lacks  crests;  ribs  very  low,  thin,  slightly 
recurved,  rarely  enlarged,  up  to  42  on  last  whorl;  suture 
impressed  but  not  disjunct;  spiral  threads  crowded,  vari- 
able; last  whorl  inflated;  umbilicus  very  narrow. 

Scala  emiliac  Melvill  &  Standen,  1903:343-344,  pi.  7, 
fig.  6.  Kaicher,  1980:  card  2313  [Epitonium].  Kilburn, 
1985:307,  figs.  120-121.  Pakistan  to  South  Africa.  Smaller 
than  E.  phymanthi  (12  mm);  spire  slightly  higher  (spire 
angle  40°);  21-36  low,  thread-like  ribs;  pale  brown  (if 
not  laded). 

Scalaria  Jriahilis  Sowerby,  1844:95  bis,  pi.  33,  fig.  74. 
Kaicher,  1980:  card  2^29  [Epitonium].  Southern  Austra- 
lia. Higher  spire  than  E  phynianllii  (spire  angle  30°- 
35°);  spire  profile  evenly  convex;  no  umbilicus. 

Scala  frielei  Dall,  1889:313.  Not  illustrated.  USNM 
83727  (syntypes):  AMNH  194388.  North  Carolina;  Vir- 


gin Islands.  Clench  &  Turner  (1952:300-301)  and 
Warmke  &  Abbott  (1962:81,  pi.  14a)  misidentified  this 
species.  Smaller  (6.4  mm);  24-31  ribs  on  last  whorl;  no 
shouldering;  strong  spiral  threads;  umbilicus  narrow  ;  spire 
fairly  high  (spire  angle  45°).  Epitonium  phymanthi  has 
been  misidentified  as  this  species. 

Epitonium  (Nitidiscala)  hancocki  DuShane,  1970:332, 
pi.  51,  fig.  1  DuShane,  197432-33,  fig.  73.  Kaicher,  1983: 
card  3612.  Galapagos.  Smaller  (13  mm);  spire  higher 
(spire  angle  30°);  fewer  ribs  (21);  rib  crests  wavy. 

Scalaria  imperialis  Sowerby,  1844:91-92  bis,  pi.  33, 
figs.  56-.57.  Wilson  &  Gillett,  1972,  pi.  13,  figs.  5,  .5a 
[color].  [Epitonium  inipcrialc].  Kaicher,  1980:  card  2304. 
AMNH  1.36625,  1.57310;  ANSP  181726,  19,5661,  2.5.3841, 
25.3842,  uncat.;  MCZ  294909,  294914;  USNM  694170. 
East  Africa,  Western  Australia,  Philippines  and  Queens- 
land. Larger  (40  mm);  pale  tan  to  dark  reddish  or  pur- 
plish brow  !i,  commonly  in  spiral  bands  (ribs  white);  more 
ribs,  increasing  to  48  on  last  whorl;  umbilicus  wide  and 
deep;  operculum  grey-black. 

Scalaria  irregularis  Sowerby,  1844:90  bis,  pi.  '33,  figs. 
40,  60.  Philippines;  Japan.  USNM  .343440.  Up  to  18  mm 
long;  spire  angle  6.5°;  ribs  crowded,  37  on  last  whorl, 
irregular  in  thickness  but  generally  thin,  with  slight  crest- 
ing; strong  spiral  threads;  slightly  umbilicate;  1  pale  brown 
subsutural  band  present  or  absent  on  white.  Resembles 
£.  phymanthi. 

Scalaria  kraussi  Nyst,  1871:116.  Kilburn,  1985:29.3- 
295,  figs.  97-100  [Epitonium  (Hyaloscala)].  +  Epiton- 
ium shepstoncnsc  E..^.  Smith,  1910:204,  pi.  7,  fig.  15. 
Kaicher,  1981:  card  3113.  .South  Africa.  Smaller  (10-16 
mm);  spire  averages  higher  (spire  angle  25°-40°);  17-37 
fine,  low,  erect  or  slightly  reflexed  ribs  on  later  whorls; 
umbilicus  closed.  Species  believed  to  be  most  similar  to 
£.  ivorsfoldi 

Perlucidiscala  lacrymula  Jousseaume,  1911:198,  pi.  5, 
figs.  37-42.  Kaicher,  1981:  3063  [Epitonium  "lachry- 
mida"].  Gulf  of  Aden.  Smaller  (5  mm);  spiral  threads 
towards  apex. 

Scalaria  latifasciata  Sowerby  in  Reeve,  1874:  species 
117.  Type  species  ot  Papyriscala  de  Boury.  Taki,  1956 
[anatomy].  ANSP  70738,  219307,  234733,  243255;  MCZ 
294908  and  5  uncat.  lots.  Mozambique;  Mauritius;  Japan. 
L'p  to  18  mm  long;  spire  low  (spire  angle  5.5°);  trace  of 
whorl  disjunction;  thin,  low  ribs  mostly  not  connected 
from  whorl  to  whorl;  32  ribs  on  last  w  horl,  some  irreg- 
ularly spaced  or  thickened;  weak  to  strong  spiral  threads; 
no  crests;  2  or  3  brown  spiral  bands;  slightly  imibilicate. 

Scalaria  lineolata  "Kiener"  Sowerby,  1844:91  bis,  pi. 
33,  figs.  45,  46,  48.  Confused  with  S.  lineata  Kiener  not 
Sav.  Nvst,  1871:118,  pi.  2,  fig.  5,  pi,  6,  fig.  20.  Kaicher, 
1981:  card  3125  [Epitonium].  ANSP  70742,  86246, 
243289;  MC:Z  294911  and  2  uncat.  lots;  USNM  198709. 
Gulf  of  Aqaba;  Mauritius;  Philippines;  Japan.  Up  to  19 
mm  long;  spire  angle  40°;  ribs  more  numerous  (16-33) 
and  more  irregularly  spaced  and  thickened  ribs;  no  spiral 
sculpture;  umbilicate;  1-3  brown  spiral  band(s)  per  w  horl; 
operculum  dark  brown 

Scalaria  lyra  Sowerby,  1844:89  bis,  pi.  32,  figs.  38-.39, 
pi.  34,  figs.  81-82;  Sowerby  in  Reeve,  1873:  species  23. 


R.  Robertson.  1993 


Page  93 


Kaicher,  1980:  card  2341  [Epilimininl  KillKirn,  1985: 
308-309,  figs.  122].  ANSP  195(iH,  19567,  119638;  MCZ 
187720;  LlSNM  431817,  306339;  820891.  Type  species 
of  Limiscala  de  Boury.  Fiji  to  Japan  and  the  Red  Sea  to 
Mozambique.  Slightly  smaller  (20+  mm);  spire  lower 
(spire  angle  60°);  27-45  erect  ribs;  spiral  threads  fine  and 
dense;  0,  2  or  3  brown  spiral  bands. 

Scala  melior  Melvill  &  Staiulen,  1903:345,  pi.  7,  fig. 
9.  Kaicher,  1980:  card  2S33[Epitonium].  ANSP  164808 
(syntype);  USNM  424868.  Pakistan;  Gulf  of  Oman 
Smaller  (6.5  mm  +  );  8  (teleoconch?)  whorls;  spire  angle 
30°;  up  to  23  ribs  per  whorl;  spiral  threads  present  or 
absent.  Resembles  a  small  E.  wor.sjoldi. 

Scala  micromphala  Morch,  1875a:258  ("Vieques," 
Puerto  Rico,  one  specimen  collected  by  A.H.  Riise)  Not 
illustrated.  Photograph  of  holotype  in  Clench  and  Turner 
(1951:258-260,  pi.  112,  fig.  3),  wrongly  synonymized  by 
them  with  E.  occidentale  Nyst,  1871,  which  according 
to  them  has  "12  to  15  costae  on  the  body  whorl.  '  Ac- 
cording to  Morch  there  were  18  ribs  on  the  5  mm. -long 
shell.  An  E.  phymanthi  that  long  would  have  had  more 
than  20  ribs.  In  addition,  E.  micromphala  has  subsutur- 
ally  crested  ribs;  in  E.  phymanthi  the  crests  are  on  the 
shoulders  of  the  ribs.  Morch  wrongly  likened  S.  microm- 
phala to  S.  imperialis  (see  under  that  species) 

Scala  {Viciniscala'"')  mimiticosia  de  Bour\',  1912:87- 
90,  pi.  7,  fig.  1.  Compared  with  Scala  costulata  and  S. 


principalis  "West  Columbia."  DuShane  ( 1974:20-22,  figs. 
20-26).  Larger  than  £.  worsfoldi  (35  mm);  spire  high 
(spire  angle  35°);  21  mainly  thin,  low  ribs  on  last  whorl; 
whorls  all  narrowly  disjunct,  but  ribs  attached;  traces  of 
spiral  striae;  umbilicus  narrow,  deep;  ribs  slightly  re- 
flexed;  crowded  spiral  threads. 

Turbo  principalis  Pallas,  1774.  Nomen  dubium.  Epi- 
tonium  principale  (Pallas)  Roding,  1798:91.  De  Bourv, 
1912:89-90,  97.  See  above  in  synonymy  of  E.  worsfoldi. 

Scalaria  rohillardi  Sowerb\ ,  1894:42-43,  pi  4,  fig.  5. 
Kaicher,  1981:  card  3037.  Kilburn,  1985:305-307,  figs. 
118-119  [Epitonium  (Papyriscala)].  Red  Sea  and  India 
to  South  Africa.  Smaller  (15  mm);  more  ribs  (20-24  on 
last  whorl);  umbilicate;  pale  tan  with  2-3  brown  spiral 
bands  (rarely  absent). 

Epitonium  shcpstonense.  See  above  under  E.  kraussi. 

"Foracciscala"  [=Foliaceiscala]  virgo  Masahito  & 
Habe,  1976:172,  figs.  2-3.  Compared  with  "Foraccis- 
cala" duhia  (Sowerb\,  1844).  Japan.  Paratype  most  re- 
sembles £.  phynuinthi,  spire  angle  40°;  50-60  weakly 
lamellate  growth  riblets;  suture  slightly  disjunct,  whorls 
connected  by  ribs;  aperture  constricted  (holotype);  oblique 
spiral  threads. 

Epitonium  (Nitidiscala)  willetti  Strong  &  Hertlein, 
1937:171,  pi.  35,  fig.  5.  DuShane,  1974:38-39,  fig.  72. 
Tropical  eastern  Pacific.  Much  smaller  (3.2  mm);  18- 
22 -h  ribs. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(3):94-96,  1993 


Page  94 


Phalium  {Semicassis)  vector,  a  New  Deep-Water  Species  from 
the  Central  Indian  Ocean 


R.  Tucker  Abbolt 

Bailey-Matthews  Shell  Miimuiii 
P.O.  Box  1580 
Saiiibel,  FL  33957  USA 


ABSTRACT 


Phalium  (Semicassis)  vector,  a  new  species  of  the  family  Cas- 
sidae,  is  described  from  the  Saya  de  Malha  Bank,  northeast  of 
Mauritius  in  the  Indian  Ocean  It  differs  from  its  closest  relative, 
Phalium  microstoma  (von  Martens,  1903)  from  Somalia,  in 
having  a  lighter,  less  elongate  shell  with  stronger  beads  on  the 
spiral  lirae. 

Keii  irords:    Cassidae,  Sa\a  dc  Malha  liank.  Indian  Oceaii 


INTRODUCTION 

A  number  of  new  species  of  marine  mollusks  have  been 
collected  over  the  past  few  years  by  Soviet  research  ves- 
sels exploring  the  Saya  de  Malha  submarine  bank  in  the 
central  part  of  the  Indian  Ocean.  Among  these  are  species 
of  cassids  not  known  at  the  time  of  my  revision  of  this 
family  (Abbott,  1968). 

In  1975,  Kilburn  described  Phalium  glahratum  sub- 
species fernandesi  from  deep  water  off  Somalia.  Two 
years  later  it  was  dredged  by  the  R/V  Gordy  on  the 
Saya  de  Malha  Banks.  With  it  were  recovered  at  least 
five  specimens  of  a  new  Phalium  referable  to  the  sub- 
genus Semicafisis  Morch,  1852. 

The  bathymetry  antl  geologs  of  the  Saya  de  Malha 
Bank  are  discussed  by  Bouchet  and  Bail  (1991:161),  while 
Bondarev  and  Rockel  (1992)  provided  an  excellent  pop- 
ular account  of  this  bank,  which  is  located  along  the 
Mascarene  Ridge  north  of  the  Mauritius  and  C^argados 
Carajos  Shoals  (between  9°:3()'S  and  12°2()'S,  and  59°30'E 
and  62°3()'E). 


interstices  of  etjual  width.  CJolor  opaque  white  with  large, 
faint,  light-brow  II  blotch  on  dorsal  surface  of  last  whorl. 
Protoconch  (fig.  2)  of  3'/2  whorls,  obtuse-conical,  glassy- 
white,  smooth.  Teleoconch  of  5'/2  whorls,  the  last  bearing 
23  flattish,  spiral  cords  with  fine  beads  at  intersections 
with  fine  axial  threads.  Suture  simple,  slightK  impressed. 
Spire  convex-conic.  Aperture  %  shell  length.  Outer  lip 
reflected,  of  variable  thickness,  enamel-white,  crossed  by 
20-22  distinct,  sharp  white  denticles.  Both  true  and  false 
umbilici  small,  open,  deep.  Channel  behind  siphoual  ca- 
nal deep,  narrow.  Parietal  wall  slightly  glazed  over.  An- 
terior part  of  columella  strongly  and  unevenly  pustulose, 
inner  edge  with  4-5  small  denticles,  outer  edge  with  3- 
4  small,  roimded  projections.  Soft  parts  and  operculum 
tmknown. 


Type  locality:  Central  Basin,  Saya  de  Malha  Bank,  Mas- 
carene Ridge,  northeast  of  Mauritius,  Indian  Ocean, 
dredged  from  sandy  silt  bottom  at  a  depth  of  80  meters, 
R/V  Gordy,  1989.  More  precise  locality  data  did  not 
accoinpany  the  holotype. 

Material  examined:  Holotype,  USNM  860326,  Paratypes 
1-3,  Donald  Dan  collection,  all  from  the  type  locality. 
The  specimen  illustrated  by  Bondarev  and  Rockel  (1992; 
fig.  5)  is  designated  as  paratype  4 

Etymology:  1  take  pleasure  in  naming  this  species  after 
the  first  recreational  diving  vessel  to  operate  under  the 
Russian  flag,  the  Vector. 

Comparative  remarks:  This  new  species  belongs  to  a 
species  group  of  Phalium  (Semicassis)  mainly  limited  to 


SYSTEM  ATICS 

Phalium  (Semicassis)  vector  Abbolt,  new  species 
Figures  1-2 


Synonymy: 

Phalium  sp    1.  Bcindarev  &  Biicki 


1992:28,32,  fig  5 


Description:  Shell  (fig.  1 )  reaching  60  mm  in  length, 
light,  strong,  evenly  ovate,  with  numerous,  fine,  flattish, 
crowded,  weakly-beaded  spiral  lirae  separated  b\  sunken 


Table  1.   Phalium  (Semicassis)  vector  new  spfc'\es  l.inearshell 
measurements  (nun)  and  counts 


llol(it\pc 
I'aratype  1 
Paratype  2 
l'arat>  pc  3 


Length 


53.6 
56.8 
53.4 

(iO  0 


Width 


32,0 
32. 1 
33.4 
33  5 


Number  ol 
whorls 


R.  T.  Abbott,  1993 


Page  95 


'--^ 


\. 


Figures  1,  2.  Phalitun  {Seniicassis)  vector  new  species.  1.  A|Hiluidl,  lalcral,  and  dorsal  views  of  the  holotype.  1.0  X.  2.  Protoconch 
of  paratype  1.  Botli  from  Saya  de  Maiha  Bank,  Mascarene  Ridge,  N  E.  of  \4adagascar,  dredged  from  sandy  silt  bottom  at  a  depth 
of  80  meters,  R/V  C;ordy,  1989.  Scale  bar  =  500  nm. 


the  western  Indian  Ocean,  although  similar  species,  such 
as  P.  sculptuni  J.  de  C.  Sowerby,  1840  (Miocene),  P. 
mehranictim  (Vredenburg,  1925)  (Upper  Miocene)  and 
P.  oligocalanticum  (Vredenburg,  1925)  (Oligocene)  have 
been  reported  from  fossil  beds  on  the  mainland  of  India. 
Phalium  vector  most  closely  resembles  the  eastern  Af- 
rican deep-water  Phalium  {SemicassU}  microstoma  (von 
Martens,  1903),  from  which  it  differs  in  being  niucli 
lighter  in  weight,  less  elongate,  and  in  having  stronger 
beads  on  the  spiral  lirae.  Phalium  vector  lacks  the  four 
or  five  spiral  brown  bands  on  the  body  whorl,  but  instead 
has  a  faint  tan  blotch  on  the  dorsal  surface  of  the  body 
whorl.  The  very  weak,  rounded  projections  on  the  outer, 
left  edge  of  the  columella  of  P.  vector  are  reminiscent 
of  the  fingertip  projections  found  in  the  shallow-water 
Indian  Ocean  Phalium  Jaurotis  (Jousseaume,  1888). 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  am  indebted  to  Mr.  Donald  Dan  of  Ft  Myers,  Florida, 
L  SA,  and  to  Mr.  Valeri  B.  Darkin  of  Vladivostok,  Russia, 
for  allowing  me  to  examine  and  describe  this  new  species. 
\lr  Darkin  kindly  presented  the  holotype  of  to  the  Na- 
tional Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  Insti- 
tution (USNM). 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Abbott,  R.  T.    1968     The  helmet  shells  of  the  world  (Cassidae). 

Part  1.  Indo-Pacific  Molliisca  2(9):15-202, 
Bondarcs,  I   and  D   R5ckei,     1992     The  shells  of  the  Sa\a  de 

Malha  Bank,  La  C:onchig!ia  23(262):21-34. 
Biiuchet,  P  aiidP  Bail,    1991.    Volutes  from  the  Sava  de  Malha 


Page  96  THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 

Bank:  The  saga  of  Lijria  surinanwn.si.s  aiul  a  ni-u  species.  soiclae,  Ceritliiidae,   loniiidae,  Cassidae,  Buccinidae,  Fas- 

The  Nautilus  105(4):159-164.  ciolariiilae,  Turhinellidae,  urridae,  Architectonicidae,  Ep- 

Kilburii,  R.     1975.    Taxonomic  notes  on  South  African  marine  ilotiiidae,  l.inndae,  and  Thraciidae.  Annals  of  the  Natal 

Mollnsca  (5);  including  descriptii>Ms  of  new   ta\a  of  Ris-  Museum  22(2):.577-622. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(3):97-103.  1993 


Page  97 


Ferussac  and  d'Orbigny's  '^Histoire  naturelle  generale  et 
particuliere  des  Cephalopodes  acetabidiferes":  Dates  of 
Publication  of  Plates  and  Text 


Annie  Tillier 

Renala  Boucher-Rodoni 

Biulogit-'  dt'S  lii\  fi'tebri'S  niuriiis  ft 

Malacologie 

LIRA  699  CNRS— Museum  National 

d  Histoire  Naturelle 

55,  rue  Buifon 

75005  Paris,  FRANCE 


ABSTRACT 

Ferussac  and  d Orbigny  s  "Histoire  naturelle  generale  et  par- 
ticuliere des  Cephalopodes  acclahuliferes  is  an  essential  con- 
tribution to  teuthology,  because  of  the  numerous  new  species 
described,  and  because  it  represents  the  first  important  com- 
pilation of  cephalopods  Issued  between  1834  and  1848,  in  21 
jisraisons,  the  actual  dates  of  publication  of  most  ot  its  parts 
were  hitherto  uncertain.  A  thorough  bibliographic  search  has 
allowed  us  to  gather  new  information  about  the  publication  nl 
this  work.  We  can  now  identif >  and  date  preciseU  the  '50  plates 
issued  in  1834  and  the  72  plates  issued  in  1835;  the  remaining 
42  plates  are  dated  1839-1841  or  1839-1842,  D'Orbigny's  text 
was  issued  between  1839  and  1848  (livraison  12-21)  The  last 
three  livraisons  (1845-1848)  included  only  text 

Key  Words:  Cephalopods;  Publication  dates;  Ferussac  and 
d  Orbigny. 


INTRODUCTION 

During  the  first  half  of  the  19th  Century ,  a  vast  amount 
of  material  was  collected  Bn'  the  scientists  participating 
in  French  voyages  around  the  world,  the  accounts  of 
which  were  published  under  the  following  titles:  Voyage 
aux  terrea  Anstrales  (Ic  Geographe,  le  Natiiraliste,  la 
Casiiarina)  from  1800  to  1804  by  Peron;  Voyage  de  la 
Coquille.  from  1822  to  1825  by  Lesson;  Voyage  en  Arnc- 
rique  meridionalc ,  from  1826  to  1833  by  d  Orbigny; 
Voyage  autour  du  rnonde  (Uranie  et  Physicienne),  from 
1817-1820and  Voyage  de  I' Astrolabe,  from  1826  to  1829 
by  Quoy  and  Gaimard;  Voyage  de  la  Bunite.  from  1836 
to  1837  by  Eydou.x  and  Souleyet,  The  specimens  collected 
on  all  of  these  voyages  were  deposited  in  the  Museum 
National  d'Histoire  Naturelle,  Paris,  and  described  not 
only  by  the  collectors  themselves,  but  also  by  other  con- 
temporary zoologists  such  as  de  Blainville,  Lamarck  and 
Ferussac.  These  collections  gave  rise  to  numerous  works 


that  constitute  a  considerable  contribution  to  the  devel- 
opnient  of  natural  history. 

The  publications  issued  during  the  first  half  of  the  19th 
century  were  delivered  as  a  series  of  numbered  parts,  or 
livraisons,  and  several  years  were  often  necessary  to  com- 
plete a  work.  Such  is  the  case  for  the  "Histoire  naturelle 
generale  et  partictdiere  des  Cephalopodes  acelabuli- 
feres.  .  ."  by  Ferussac  and  d  Orbigny,  which  was  issued 
in  21  livraisons,  from  1834  to  1848,  and  whose  publi- 
cation was  particularly  lengthy  and  confused. 

Ferussac  intended  to  publish  an  important  and  general 
work  on  Mollusca  ("Histoire  naturelle.  generale  et  par- 
ticuliere des  Mollusques').  where  all  the  monographs 
written  by  him  and  other  authors  might  be  included.  As 
early  as  1825,  he  had  asked  d'Orbigny  to  collaborate  in 
the  publication  of  the  "Histoire  des  Cephalopodes". 
D'Orbigny  started  at  once  to  produce  plates  and  te.xt, 
but  in  1826  he  left  for  an  eight  year  long  voyage  to  South 
America.  It  was  only  in  1834-35,  after  his  return,  that 
the  first  parts  were  distributed.  Ferussac  died  in  1836, 
and  it  was  not  until  1837  that  d  Orbigny  could  recover 
his  manuscript,  and  he  then  spent  the  follow  ing  two  years 
updating  it  (1839;  issue  of  the  first  part  of  d'Orbigny's 
text). 


DESCRIPTION  OF  THE  WORK 

The  "Histoire  naturelle  generale  et  particuliere  des  Ce- 
phalopodes acetalndiferes.  .  ."  comprises  2  volumes 
bound  according  to  the  instructions  of  d  Orbigny: 

1 — A  volume  of  text,  starting  with  d  Orbigny  s  Preface 
(pp.  I-LVI),  followed  by  361  pages  of  taxonomic  de- 
scriptions. The  first  livraison  of  text  (livr.  12)  is  dated 
1839  and  largely  postdates  the  Atlas. 

An  introduction  to  Mollusks  and  general  remarks  on 
Cephalopods  by  Ferussac  (96  pages),  was  issued  in  liv- 


Page  98 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


raisoiis  1  to  6  (1834-1835).  A  copy  of  this  text  was  coii- 
.siilted  at  the  "Bibliothecjue  Nationale"  in  Paris,  where 
it  is  kept  in  the  original  wrapper,  on  the  cover  of  which 
appears:  " Histoirc  naturcllc  ncncralc  et  part icxtUcre  des 
MoUusqiies — Monographic  des  C'cphalopodcs  Cnjpto- 
dibranches" .  This  part  was  originally  intended  to  be 
included  in  the  work,  but  d'Orbigny  considered  it  to  be 
obsolete.  In  his  instructions  to  the  liinilcr  he  specifies  that 
it  is  not  part  of  the  work  on  the  Cephalopods  and  must 
therefore  be  bound  separately. 

2 — An  Atlas  of  144  plates  (90  plates  named  "Cryptodi- 
branche",  52  named  "Acetabulifere",  one  bearing  both 
names  (Octopus  pi. 23)  "Cryptodibranche"  and  "Aceta- 
buliiere  ',  and  one  having  neither  of  them  (Bellerophon 
pi.T). 

Winckworth  (1942)  stated  that  a  large  number  of  plates 
were  ready  in  1826,  when  d'Orbigny  left  for  South  Amer- 
ica; but  were  delivered  only  after  his  return  in  1834. 
Ferussac  was  at  that  time  publishing  the  " Histoire  na- 
turcllc .  .  .  des  Mollusques  terrestres  et  fluviatiles"  in 
collaboration  with  Deshayes.  He  also  had  to  assume  the 
heavy  costs  of  the  "Bulletin  Universel  des  Sciences  et 
de  I  Industrie' \  which  he  created  and  managed.  How- 
ever, Ferussac  (1831:374)  himself  confirms  that  most  of 
the  "Cryptodibranche  '  plates  were  ready  in  1831:  "de- 
puis  longtemps  tous  les  Cephalopodes  de  I'ordre  des 
Cnjptodihranches  .  .  .  composent  cet  ouvrage  pret  a  etre 
livre  a  I  impression,  et  dont  les  planches  au  nombre  de 
pres  de  80  sont  tirees  et  enluminees". 


HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  PREVIOUS 
RESEARCH 

Sherborn  and  Woodward  (1901:75)  were  the  first  to  pub- 
lish some  dates,  in  a  footnote  to  their  paper  on  the  pub- 
lication dates  of  "Mollusques  terrestres  et  fluviatiles" 
by  Ferussac  and  Deshayes.  They  are  very  concise  and 
do  not  mention  their  sources:  "Of  the  dates  of  publication 
of  this  work  all  that  can  at  present  be  said  is  that  the 
first  three  out  of  21  liv.  appeared  in  Sept.  1834,  nos.4-9 
in  1835,  no.l2  in  1839,  nos.13-18  in  1840  taking  the 
work  up  to  p.  240;  and  that  it  was  finished  in  1848". 

The  copy  of  Ferussac  and  d'Orbigny  s  work  in  The 
Natural  History  Museum,  London,  gives  some  evidence 
of  how  Sherborn  deduced  some  of  the  dates.  \  hand- 
written note  says: 

"It  is  obvious,  as  the  date  1837  occurs  on  pp.  Ill  -I-  27 
&  1838  on  pp.  V  +  73  &  1839  on  p.  139— that  no  text 
was  published  before  1837.  9  parts  were  published  by 
1835  (clearly  these  were  all  plates  or  part  of  the  text  to 
volume  II  Atlas,  which  containing  no  species  does  not 
concern  us).  Part  12  was  published  in  1839  &  13-18 
(bringing  the  work  up  to  p.  240)  in  1840.  \  fresh  font 
of  type  was  used  on  p.  241  (compare  the  444 's  in  the 
pagination)  &  references  to  1845  are  frequent  between 
pp.  241-361. 

I  therefore  regard  \'ol.  I,  pp.  I-LVI  &  1-240  as  1840; 
pp.  241-361  as  1848;  Vol.  II  text,  pp.  1-96  as  1835". 


These  considerations  are  dated  October  1901.  The  last 
part  is  repeated  in  the  bibliograplu  of  the  Index  .\ni- 
nialium  (Sherborn,  1922:  LlII),  with  an  extra  remark: 
"[Dates]  of  plates  unknown". 

The  references  to  1835  most  probabK  come  from  the 
Bibliographie  de  la  France,  which  he  thouroughly  con- 
sulted to  date  Ferussac  and  Deshav  es'  "Histoirc  naturcllc 
des  Mollusques.  .  .".  He  thus  probabK  knew  that  the  first 
9  livraisons  were  issued  in  1834  and  1835,  and  that  thev 
comprised  only  plates  (although  he  did  not  know  w  hich 
ones)  and  Ferussac's  preface. 

Thus  Sherborn  did  not  have  sufficient  information  to 
date  the  plates,  but  he  attempted  to  date  the  text,  rel\  ing 
on  the  dates  cited  in  the  first  pages  of  the  text  and  in 
the  preface  by  d'Orbigny.  His  conclusion  was  that  the 
text  could  not  have  been  issued  before  1837  (he  had  no 
data  regarding  livraisons  10  and  11). 

As  far  as  the  dates  of  livraisons  12  (1839)  and  13-18 
("bringing  the  work  up  to  p.  240  ";  1840)  are  concerned, 
we  could  not  determine  his  sources.  He  stated  that  a 
fresh  type  font  was  used  on  p.  241,  in  the  pagination, 
but  after  a  thorough  examination  of  the  different  copies 
we  could  consult,  we  noticed  that  such  a  change  in  the 
pagination  font  of  type  actually  occurs  on  page  273. 

Winckworth  (1942)  had  some  additional  data  that  al- 
lowed him  to  propose  dates  for  the  plates  issued  in  1834- 
1835.  He  possessed  a  bound  copy  of  the  1834-1835  liv- 
raisons, although  he  did  not  have  enough  information  to 
know  precisely  if  this  copy  represented  9,  10  or  11  liv- 
raisons, and  w  hich  of  the  plates  were  issued  in  1834  and 
which  were  issued  in  1835. 

For  the  text,  he  used: 

-  the  dates  proposed  b\  Sherborn  and  Woodward 
(1901); 

-  d  Orbign\  s  "Mollusques  vivants  et  fossilcs"  (1845), 
a  thorough  reading  of  which  allowed  him  to  point  out 
that  all  the  plates  and  the  text  up  to  and  including  page 
271  are  mentioned.  This  led  him  to  introduce  an  extra 
break  in  the  text,  and  to  date  as  1848  all  the  text  following 
page  27 1 ; 

-  the  text  of  d  Orbignv  himself,  where  1839  is  the  latest 
bibliographic  reference  on  page  210,  and  where  the 
"Mollusques  vivants  et  fossiles"  (1845)  is  first  mentioned 
on  page  273; 

-  the  indications  on  the  back  wrappers  of  the  "His- 
toirc. .  .  des  mollusques  terrestres  et  fluviatiles",  with 
which  he,  however,  partly  disagrees.  This  is  discussed  in 
more  detail  below . 


ORIGINAL  RESULTS  AND  DISCUSSION 

Three  articles  issued  in  the  "Bulletin  zoologique"  and 
in  the  "Annalcs  des  Sciences  naturcllcs"  enlightened  us 
as  to  the  content  of  the  first  li\raisans,  and  encouraged 
us  to  investigate  further  and  to  retrace  the  history  of  the 
publication  of  the  "Histoire  generale  et  particuliere  des 
Cephalopodes  Acctabidifcrcs".  Successively,  the  follow- 
ing data  w  ere  gathered  from  1 1  different  sources: 


A.  Tillier  and  R.  Boucher-Rodoni,  1993 


Page  99 


1 — "Bibliographic  de  la  France,  ou  Journal  general  de 
I'Imprimerie  et  de  la  Lihrairie'    Paris,  Pillet  Aiiie: 
23e  annee,  no.  39,  27  Sept.  1834,  p.  615,  no.  5229; 
24e  annee,  no.  16,  18  Avril  1835,  p.  246,  no.  2099; 
no.  23,  6  Juin  1835,  p.  360,  no.  3058. 
The  issue,  nuini)er  oi  pages  of  text  and  plates  of  liv- 
raisons  1-9,  are  announced  fnit  no  details  are  given  on 
tfie  content  of  tfie  livraisons:  Livraisons  1-3  (27  Septem- 
ber 1834):  30  plates  and  5  sheets  of  text;  livraisons  4-6 
(18  April  1835):  29  plates  and  7  sheets  of  text;  livraisons 
7-9  (6  June  1835):  25  plates  and  1  sheet  with  front  page. 

2 — "Bulletin  Zoologiquc".  2e  section,  1835: 

-  p.  14-16:  some  details  on  livraisons  1-3  are  given; 

-  p.  63-65:  all  the  species  figured  in  the  plates  of 
livraisons  4-6  are  listed. 

3 — "Annales  des  Sciences  naturellcs",  2e  serie,  3,  Zool- 
ogie.  Paris,  Crochard  1835,  p.  192  (f.l2,  March).  As  early 
as  March  1835,  12  livraisons  of  9  to  10  plates  each  are 
announced  as  read\ ,  9  of  which  were  on  sale  (whereas 
La  Bibliographie  de  la  France  announces  their  issue  later 
in  the  same  year).  A  list  of  all  the  species  issuetl  in  the 
plates  of  the  livraisons  1-9  is  given. 

4 — "Notice  analytique  sur  les  travaux  de  Zoologie  de 
Mr.  Alcide  d'Orbigny"  (1856).  Dumeril  made  two  favor- 
able reports  at  the  Academic  des  Sciences,  on  the  first 
eleven  livraisons,  on  the  15  December  1834  and  29  June 
1835  (see  also  d  Orbigny  s  Introduction,  p.  II).  This  allows 
livraisons  10-11  to  be  dated  1835. 

5 — "Registre  des  proces-verbaux  et  rapports  des  seances 
de  r Academic  Royale  des  Sciences.  Institut",  vol.10, 
1832-1835:  p.  579,  22  September  1834:  the  delivery  of 
Ferussac's  first  three  li\raisons  is  announced;  p.  724,  29 
June  1835:  Dumeril  indicates  that  the  last  five  livraisons 
are  issued. 

In  the  "pochette  de  la  seance  du  15  deeembre  1834" 
we  found  Dumeril's  report  (two  handwritten  pages)  de- 
scribing the  first  three  livraisons,  i.e.  an  Introduction  b\ 
Ferussac  and  28  plates  ("les  figures  de  ranimal  de  I'Ar- 
gonaute  argo  et  de  son  anatomic,  faites  par  Poli  .  .  . 
lithographiees  par  Chazal.  Plusicurs  especes  nouvelles 
de  poulpes,  et  des  dessins  executes  a  Cadix  d'apres  les 
dissections  de  deux  tres  habiles  anatomistcs  .  .  .  repro- 
duites  par  Jacob". 

There  is  no  trace  in  the  "pochette  of  Dumeril's  report 
on  the  29  June  1835,  concerning  the  "last  five  livraisons". 

Our  sources  are  consistent  with  livraisons  1  to  1 1  being 
delivered  in  1834-1835,  the  first  nine  three  by  three.  The 
"last  five  livraisons"  announced  by  Dumeril  in  1835  are 
thus  livraisons  7-9  and  10-11. 

6 — "La  litterature  jranqaise  contemporaine,  1827-1844, 
Dictionnaire  Bibliographiqiie"  b>  MM.  Ch.Louandre  and 
F.  Bourquelot,  Paris,  Felix  Daguin,  t.3,  1848,  p.  190- 
191.  The  " Histoire  .  .  .  des  Cephalopodes  ' ,  is  announced 
as  published  in  Paris,  1834-1842,  in  20  livraisons,  each 
comprising  10  plates  and  corresponding  text,  18  livrai- 
sons of  which  were  on  sale.  Thus  we  did  deduce  that  18 
livraisons  were  issued  from  1834  to  1842,  livraison  18 


being  dated  1842;  we  know  that  the  last  livraison  (21st) 
was  issued  in  1848.  From  the  e\  idence  of  the  type  font 
change  on  p.  273  and  of  references  to  d'Orbigny  (1845), 
we  consider  that  livraison  20  (pp.  273-320,  see  below) 
also  appeared  in  1848.  As  for  livraison  19,  we  date  it 
1845,  since  apparently  it  was  not  yet  on  sale  in  1844,  Init 
the  text  up  to  p.  271  is  quoted  by  d'Orbigny  (1845). 

7 — Two  complete  works  (Text  and  Atlas)  from  the  "Bi- 
bliothcque  Nationale":  their  peculiarity  is  that  they  have 
been  marked  with  different  stamps  (Bibliotheciue  Im- 
periale,  Bibliotheque  Royale  or  Bibliotheque  Nationale). 
.'Ml  the  plates  are  stamped,  w  hereas  the  text  bears  only 
a  few  stamps.  A  thorough  examination  of  these  stamps 
in  the  two  volumes  of  text  revealed  that  they  were  not 
randomly  distributed  but  seemed  to  correspond  either  to 
the  beginning  or  to  the  end  of  a  set  of  livraison  (Table 
1).        ^ 

In  one  of  the  copies  of  the  Atlas,  all  the  plates  are 
marked  "Bibliotheque  Royale",  except  32  that  are 
stamped  "Bibliotheque  Imperiale".  These  32  plates  cor- 
respond to  most  of  the  plates  that  we  consider  as  be- 
longing to  livraisons  1-3.  We  conclude  that  the  latter  set 
constitutes  a  homogenous  lot,  which  can  be  dated  1834, 
except  for  4  plates  of  Argonauta,  which  we  are  sure 
belong  to  livraisons  7-9  (Bull.lool.  1835  and  Ann.Sci.nat. 
1835). 

All  the  plates  in  the  second  Atlas  are  stamped  "Biblio- 
theque Royale",  except  46  that  are  marked  "Biblio- 
theque Nationale"  (BN).  Knowing  what  is  included  in 
the  first  9  livraisons,  and  from  w  hat  we  infer  is  included 
in  li\raisons  10-11  (confirmed  b\  our  source  no.  8),  we 
deduce  that  the  stamp  "Bibliotheque  Nationale"  was 
used  for  all  the  plates  of  livraisons  4-6,  for  almost  all  the 
plates  of  livraisons  10-11  and  for  one  plate  of  livraisons 
7-9. 

8 — An  incomplete  bound  copy  of  the  work  present  at 
the  National  Museum  of  Wales,  the  title  page  of  which 
is  "Histoire  tiaturelle  generale  et  particuliere  des  Mol- 
lusques",  contains  the  Introduction  and  general  remarks 
on  Cephalopods  by  Ferussac,  and  101  plates.  It  corre- 
sponds perfectly  to  the  first  11  livraisons,  issued  in  1834- 
1835,  as  detailed  in  the  preceeding  paragraphs.  Only  one 
discrepancy  was  observed:  plate  25  of  Octopus,  printed 
by  Benard  and  stamped  as  BN,  that  we  consider  to  be 
part  of  the  livraisons  10-11,  is  not  included  in  this  copy. 
The  National  Museum  of  Wales  also  has  a  complete 
copy  with  handwritten  notes  by  Hovle,  and  a  series  of 
77  plates,  unbound,  corresponding  to  an  incomplete  set 
of  livraisons  1  to  11.  Plate  25  of  Octopus  is  present  in 
this  last  series  of  plates. 

9 — The  complete  copy  present  at  The  Natural  History 
Museum,  London,  bears  two  handw  ritten  notes.  One,  by 
Sherborn  on  the  first  page  of  vol.1  (Text),  dates  the  text. 
Its  content  has  been  discussed  above.  The  other,  by 
E.A.Smith  on  the  first  page  of  vol.11  (Atlas),  says: 
"Mr. Sherborn  has  been  unable  to  discover  anything  def- 
inite w  ith  regard  to  dates  of  publication  of  any  of  these 
plates  . 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


Table  1.  Details  of  text  livraisons,  with  all  available  information  on  the  .sheets  of  each  livraison,  inclusion  (P)  or  not  in  the  BIMM 
cop\,  the  stamped  pages  in  the  two  complete  works  (I  and  2)  at  the  BN  and  the  protiahle  date  of  issue  BR  =  Bibliotheque  Royale; 
BN  =  Bililii)tliei|ue  Xationale. 


Ni 

umber 

P  =  BIMM 

Sheets 

Pages  stamps 

of 

sheets 

cop\ 

Livraison 

\  ear 

1-6 

1   BR 1-48 

6 

P 

12 

1839 

7-12 

49/BR1-96  BRl 

5 

13 

1839-41 

13-18 

97/BRl  +  BR2-144/BR1 

5 

14 

1840-41 

a-c 

I  BRl-XXIV 

19-20 

145-160/BRl 

5 

P 

15 

1841 

21-24 

161/BR1-192'BR1 

4 

P 

16 

1841 

25-29 

193/BNl  +  BR2-232/BR1 

5 

P 

17 

1841 

d-g 

XXV/BRl-LVI 

4 

P 

18 

1842 

30-34 

233/BN1-272 

5 

19 

1845 

35-40 

273/BN1-320 

6 

20 

1848 

41-45 

321/8X1-361 

5 

21 

1848 

10 — An  iiiconiplete  bound  copy  of  the  work,  from  the 
library  ol  the  "Laboratoire  de  Biologie  des  Invertebres 
marins  et  Malacologie"  (BIMM)  at  the  Museum  National 
d'Histoire  Naturelle  (MNHN)  comprising:  the  introduc- 
tion and  preface  by  d'Orbigny  (pp.  I-LVI),  the  text  p. 
1-48  and  145-232,  30  plates,  all  coming  from  the  same 
printer  (Imp.  Lemercier,  Benard  et  C). 

We  interpret  this  BIMM  copy  as  corresponding  to 
livraison  12  (pp.  1-48)  and  livraisons  15-18  (pp.  I-LVI; 
145-232),  i.e.  five  livraisons,  each  of  4  to  6  sheets  of  text 
and  6  plates  (livrai.son  17  is  announced  on  back  wrappers 
as  comprising  5  or  6  sheets  of  text  and  6  plates).  This 
interpretation  also  takes  into  account  the  observations  on 
the  other  copies  of  the  work. 

There  remain  12  plates  of  the  Atlas  that  belong  neither 
to  the  first  11  livraisons  nor  to  the  BIMM  copy.  Printed 
well  before  the  text,  they  are  thought  to  have  been  issued 
in  livraisons  13-14  (i.e.  two  livraisons  of  6  plates  each). 

Thus  all  the  plates  were  delivered  before  1845  (cita- 
tions in  d'Orbigny,  1845).  The  livraisons  19,  20  and  21 
include  only  text. 

11 — "Notice  analytique  siir  les  travanx  zoologiques  el 
paleontologiques  de  Mr.Alcide  d'Orbigny"  (1844). 
D'Orbigny  states  that  his  manuscript  was  finished  in  1839. 
However,  later,  the  death  of  the  publisher  interrupted 
the  printing  of  the  text,  and  caused  several  trials.  This 
accounts  for  the  gaps  in  the  publication  of  livraisons  from 
1842  to  1845,  and  from  1845  to  1848. 

TEXT 

The  data  gathered  from  the  incomplete  BIMM  copy, 
together  with  the  .stamps  on  the  text  in  the  two  complete 
copies  of  the  BN  have  led  us  to  propo.se  that  the  text  was 
i.ssucd  in  10  livraisons. 

Livraison  12,  pp.  1-48,  1839.  This  livraison  is  included 
in  the  incomplete  copy  of  the  BIMM.  The  first  page  is 
stamped  "Bibliotheque  Royale"  in  the  BN.  Its  issue  is 
announced  on  the  back  wrappers  of  "Mollttsques  tcr- 
restres  et  fluviatiles"  (VViiukworth,  1942).  After  three 
years  \\  itiiout  aii\  liv  raison  being  issued,  it  .seems  obvious 


that  d'Orbigny,  who  had  started  to  rewrite  his  manu- 
script in  1837  (cf.  Introduction  p.  Ill),  had  published  the 
initial  part  of  it  in  this  livraison.  It  also  seems  evident 
that  the  Introduction,  which  cites  works  issued  in  1840- 
1841,  cannot  have  been  issued  in  1839. 

Livraison  13,  pp.  49-96,  1839-1841.  The  stamp  "Biblio- 
theque Royale  occurs  on  the  first  and  last  page  of  this 
livraison,  which  constitutes  5  sheets.  Further  supporting 
evidence  is  that  this  livraison  is  not  included  in  the 
incomplete  BIMM  copy.  The  announcements  on  the 
back  wrappers  of  "Molhisques  terrestres  et  fluviatiles" 
(Winckworth,  1942)  state  that  16  livraisons  were  issued 
in  1839-1841.  Lacking  any  further  information,  we  date 
livraison  13  as  1839-184L 

Livraison  14,  pp.  97-144,  1840-1841.  The  stamp  "BiWiO- 
theque  Royale  "  is  on  p.  97  of  both  copies  in  the  BN,  and 
also  on  p.  144  in  one  of  these  copies.  The  break  at  page 
97  is  thus  confirmed  twice.  The  incomplete  BIMM  copy 
lacks  pages  49-144,  confirming  the  end  of  the  livraison. 
A  reference  to  1839,  on  p.  139,  allows  livraison  14  to  be 
dated  1 840- 184 1. 

Livraison  15,  Introduction,  pp.  I-XXI\',  and  text  pp.  145- 
160,  1841.  This  livraison  is  included  in  the  BIMM  copy, 
and  is  stamped  on  p.  I  and  p.  160  of  the  BN  copy.  Stamps 
in  the  text  corresponded  to  a  livraison  of  only  two  sheets, 
which  seemed  insufficient  to  us.  When  the  first  part  of 
the  introduction  is  included,  a  livraison  of  5  sheets  is 
obtained,  stamped  at  the  beginning  and  at  the  end.  This 
is  consistent  with  the  issue  of  the  Introduction  in  two 
separate  livraisons  (stamps  on  p.  I  and  on  p.  XXV).  Ref- 
erences to  publications  issued  in  early  1841,  as  well  as 
indications  on  the  abo\  e-quoted  w  rappers  lead  us  to  pro- 
pose the  date  ot  1841  tor  livraison  15. 

Livraison  16,  pp.  161-192,  1841.  This  livraison  is  in- 
cluded in  the  BIMM  copy.  The  BN  copy  is  stamped  at 
the  beginning  (p.  161)  and  at  the  end  (p  192).  Livraison 
16  was  issued  between  two  other  livraisons  ol  1841  and 
is  therelorc  tlated  1841. 


Livrai.son   17,  pp    193-232,   1841    This  livraison  is 


A.  Tillier  and  R.  Boucher-Rodoni,  ] 

[993 

Page  101 

Table  2.    Pu 

bhcation  dates  of  the  Atla 

s  pi; 

ates,  with  identih- 

Table  2.     ('oiituiued 

cation  of  the 
=  stamps  on 

correspond 
the  BibhotI 

il1(J    liv^'^icmi      PI     = 

plate  number;  stp 

ipies;  BI  =  Biblio- 

1 

lilj^    liv 

leque 
Bihho 

National 

e  cc 

PI 

sip 

Li\  rai.son 

Date 

tlieqiie  Impcnaie;  ti.\  = 

•tlieque  .Nationaie 

0 

3 

7-9 
12/15- 

18 

March  1835 

1839-42 

PI 

stp 

Livraison 

Date 

4 

Sepia                         1 
2 

BN 

12/15- 
4-6 

18 

1839-42 

Octopus 

1 

BI 

1-3 

(1834)  1826 

March  1835 

2 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

3 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

3 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

3/2° 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

3/2° 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

4 

BI 

1-3 

(1834)  1826 

3/3° 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

5 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

4 

7-9 

March  1835 

6 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

4/2° 

7-9 

March  1835 

6/2° 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

5 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

6/3° 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

5/2° 

7-9 

March  1835 

7 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

6 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

8 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

6/2° 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

9 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

7 

7-9 

March  1835 

10 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

8 

7-9 

March  1835 

11 

7-9 

1835 

9 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

12 

BI 

1-3/4 

-6 

22  Sept.  1834 

10 

7-9 

March  1835 

13 

BI 

1-3/4 

-6 

22  Sept.  1834 

11 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

14 

BN 

1-3/4 

-6 

22  Sept.  1834 

12 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

15 

BN 

1-3/4 

-6 

22  Sept.  1834 

13 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

16 

BN 

7-9 

March  1835 

14 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

17 

7-9 

March  1835 

15 

13-14 

1839-41 

18 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

16 

13-14 

1839-41 

19 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

17 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

20 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

18 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

21 

BN 

13-14 

1839-41 

19 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

0  0 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

20 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

23 

13-14 

1839-41 

21 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

24 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

22 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

25 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

23 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

26 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

24 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

27 

13-14 

1839-41 

25 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

28 

13-14 

1839-41 

26 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

29 

13-14 

1839-41 

27 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

Eledone 

1 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

Sepioteuthis             1 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

1/2° 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

."> 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

2 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

3 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

3 

12/15- 

18 

1839-42 

4 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

Argonauta 

1 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

5 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

1/2° 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

6 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

1/3° 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

7 

12/15- 

-18 

1839-42 

1/4° 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

Loligo                       IC 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

1/5° 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

lA 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

2 

BI 

7-9 

March  1835 

2 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

3 

BI 

7-9 

March  1835 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

4 

BI 

7-9 

March  1835 

4 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

5 

BI 

7-9 

March  1835 

5 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

6 

12/15- 

18 

1839-42 

6 

7-9 

March  1835 

Bellerophon 

1 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

7 

7-9 

March  1835 

2 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

8 

7-9 

March  1835 

3 

12/15- 

18 

1839-42 

9 

7-9 

March  1835 

4 

13-14 

1839-41 

10 

7-9 

March  1835 

5 

12/15- 

18 

1839-42 

11 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

6 

12/15- 

18 

1839-42 

12 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

7 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

13 

BN 

7-9 

March  1835 

Cranchia 

1 

2 

BN 

4-6 

7-9 

March  1835 
March  1835 

14 

15 
16 

BN 
BN 

4-6 
7-9 
4-6 

March  1835 
March  1835 
March  1835 

Sepiola 

1 

BI 

1-3 

22  Sept    1834 

17 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

Page  102 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


Table  2.    C^oiiliiiiicd 


PI 

stp 

Livraison 

Date 

18 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

19 

7-9 

March  1835 

20 

13-14 

1839-41 

21 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

22 

12/15- 

IS 

1839-42 

23 

13-14 

1839-41 

24 

13-14 

1839-41 

Loligopsis 

1 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

2 

7-9 

March  1835 

3 

7-9 

March  1835 

4 

1.3-14 

1839-41 

On>choteuthis 

1 

Bl 

1-3 

22  Sept.  1834 

2 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

3 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

3/2° 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

4 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

5 

BN 

4-6 

March  1835 

6 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

7 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

8 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

9 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

10 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

11 

BN 

10-11 

29  June  1835 

12 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

13 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

14 

12/15- 

■18 

1839-42 

Ommastrephes 

1 

12/15- 

•18 

1839-42 

r> 

12/ IS- 

IS 

1839-42 

eluded  in  the  BIMM  copy.  Both  BN  copies  are  stamped 
at  the  beginning  (p.  193),  and  one  of  them  also  at  the 
end  (p.  232).  It  is  comprised  of  5  sheets.  The  back  wrap- 
pers of  "Molln.sqties  terrestres  et  fluviatiles  (1841),  state: 
"la  17eme  livraison  sera  raise  en  vente  d  la  fin  d'aout" 
(Winckworth,  1942:35).  The  date  and  content  of  this 
Hvraison  are  given  as  5  to  6  sheets  of  text  and  6  plates. 
Our  conclusions  concerning  this  livraison  contradict 
Winckworth,  who  disbelieved  the  announcement  on  the 
back  wrappers. 

Livraison  18,  Introduction  pp.  XXV-LVI,  1842.  Page 
XXV  is  stamped  in  the  BN  copy.  This  livraison  is  included 
in  the  BIMM  copy.  This  second  part  of  the  Introduction 
comprises  4  sheets.  We  include  it  in  livrai.son  18  since 
we  know  that  livraison  17  was  made  ol  5  or  6  sheets. 
The  date  1842  is  given  by  Louandre  and  Bourquelot 
(1848)  and  is  supported  by  five  of  our  sources. 

Livraison  19,  pp.  233-272,  1845.  This  livraison  is  not 
included  in  the  BIMM  copy.  It  is  stamped  on  the  first 
page  (p.  233)  in  the  BN  copy.  The  date  1845  is  based  on 
the  fact  that  livraison  19  is  not  mentioned  as  issued  in 
the  analyses  of  the  "Utterature  franqaise"  of  the  period 
from  1827  to  1844  (Louandre  &  Bourquelot,  1848),  but 
the  pages  of  this  livraison  are  (luoted  in  "Mollusqiics 
vivants  et  fossiles"  d'Orbigny  (1845). 

Livraison  20,  pp    273-320,  1848.  This  livraison  is  not 


included  in  the  BIMM  copy.  It  is  stamped  on  the  first 
()age  (p.  273)  in  the  BN  copy.  A  different  type  font  was 
used  for  the  pagination,  starting  on  p.  273  (especially  the 
5's),  References  to  the  "Mollusques  Vivants  et  Fossiles" 
(1845)  appear  in  the  te.xt,  confirming  that  this  livraison 
was  published  after  1845.  It  was  probably  issued  with 
the  21st  livraison  in  1848. 

Livraison  21,  pp.  321-361,  1848.  This  livraison  is  not 
included  in  the  BIMM  copy.  The  BN  copy  is  stamped 

on  the  first  page  (p.  321).  "Mollusques  Vivants  et  Fos- 
siles" (1845)  is  cited  in  this  livraison.  It  is  the  last  livraison, 
and  is  undoubtedly  dated  1848. 


ATLAS 

The  "Bulletin  Zoologique"  and  the  "Annales  des  Sci- 
enees  Naturelles  '  list  all  the  species  figured  in  the  plates 
issued  in  livraisons  1-9.  The  incomplete  copy  at  Cardiff 
gathers  the  first  eleven  livraisons,  as  detailed  in  sources 
2,  3,  8  (see  above).  Plates  included  in  the  BIMM  copy 
(source  10;  livraisons  12  and  15-18)  could  not  be  dated 
more  precisely  than  1839-1842. 

Details  concerning  the  dates  of  publication  and  the 
corresponding  livraison  of  each  plate  are  summarized  in 
table  2.  Our  conclusions  concerning  the  issue  ot  the  Atlas 
are  as  follows: 

Livraisons  1-3,  22  September  1834:  30  plates. 

Livraisons  4-6,  March  1835:  29  plates  (4  of  which  were 
already  issued  in  livraisons  1-3). 

Livraisons  7-9,  March  1835:  25  plates. 

Livraisons  10-11:  29  June  1835:  22  plates. 

Livraison  12,  1839:  6  plates. 

Livraisons  13-14,  1839-1841:  12  plates. 

Livraisons  15-18.  1841-1842:  24  plates. 

Two  plates  issued  in  livraisons  1-3  (Octopus  pl.l  and 
4)  had  been  distributed  as  early  as  1826  by  d'Orbigny 
hiuLself  (footnote  p.  18:  "A  la  fin  de  1825,  nous  avons 
fait  lithographier  nos  planches  representant  les  figures 
de  I'Octopus  Cuvierii  et  de  VO.Lcchcnaultii.  et  elles  out 
ete  distribuees  a  beaucoup  de  personnes   ). 


CONCLUSIONS 

A  comparative  analysis  of  Ferussac  and  d'Orbigny  s  work 
and  that  of  d'Orbigny  (1845)  confirms  that  the  dates 
iiuoted  by  d  Orbigny  are  not  reliable.  As  an  example, 
Cranchia  plate  1  includes  three  species:  C.  cardioptera, 
C.  minima  and  C.  scahra.  In  d'Orbigny  (1845),  they  are 
cited  as  figured  in  plate  1,  and  dated  respectively  1826 
(p.  390),  1830  (p.  351 )  and  1839  (p.  240).  Such  inaccuracy 
is  common  in  d'Orbigny  s  dates,  and  was  often  the  case 
at  that  time. 

Our  bibliographic  searches  allowed  us  to  acertain  the 
precise  dates  of  i.ssue  of  the  102  plates  of  the  .Mlas  that 
were  i.ssued  in  1834  and  1835,  as  well  as  their  compo- 
sition. The  dates  of  issue  of  the  remaining  plates  are 
1839-1842  (livraisons  12-18),  but  we  can  find  no  details 
on  the  actual  content  of  each  livraison. 


A.  Tillier  and  R.  Boucher-Rodoni,  1993 


Page  103 


In  the  publication  of  the  text,  we  recognize  three  main 
stages: 

1.  1834-1835.  Livraisons  1-11:  introduction  and  gen- 
eral remarks  by  Ferussac.  102  plates  of  the  Atlas.  No 
descriptions. 

2.  1839-1842.  Livraisons  12-18:  Introduction  and  gen- 
eral remarks  by  d'Orbigny.  Text  pp.  1  to  232.  Atlas:  the 
remaining  42  plates. 

3.  1845-1848.  Livraisons  19-21:  last  part  of  the  text, 
pp.  233-361.  No  plates. 

The  above  data  and  conclusions  are  summarized  in 
two  tables.  Table  1  provides  information  concerning  the 
livraisons  of  text  and  corresponding  dates.  Table  2  pro- 
vides the  publication  date  for  each  plate,  and  associates 
the  plate  with  a  corresponding  livraison. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

We  gratefully  acknowledge  the  help  and  advice  of 
Dr.PMordan,  of  The  Natural  Histor\  Museum,  London, 
throughout  our  bibliographic  search,  and  for  critical  re- 
view of  the  manuscript.  Special  thanks  to  Mr.J.R.Kenyon, 
librarian  of  the  National  Museum  of  Wales,  who  pro- 
vided most  helpful  documentation.  We  are  grateful  to 
our  colleague  Alain  Foubert  for  his  help  in  preparing 
the  tables. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

D  Orbigny,  A  1844.  Notice  analytique  sur  le  travau.x  zool- 
ogiqueset  paleontologiquesde  M.  Aicided  Orbigny.  Impr. 
Cosson,  Paris,  48p. 


D  Orbigin ,  .\.  184.5-1847.  Mdilu.sqiit-s  \i\ants  et  tossilt-s,  ou 
description  dc  toutes  ies  especes  de  coiiuiiles  et  de  Moii- 
usques   .-K    Deialiass  Libr  ,  Paris  605p  ,  :35  pis. 

D'Orbign\.  .\  1856  Notice  analytique  sur  Ies  travaux  de 
geologie.  de  paleontoiogie  et  de  zooiogie  de  M.  Alcide 
d'Orbigny,  1823-1856.  Impr.  L.S.  Crete,  Corbeil.  60pp. 

Ferussac,  A.  E.  de.  1831.  Bulletin  des  Sciences  Naturelles  et 
de  Geologie,  2e  section,  24:  373-374 

Ferussac,  A.  E,  de  and  A.  d'Orbign\.  1834-1848.  Histoire 
naturelle  generate  et  particuliere  des  Cephalopodes  ace- 
tabuiiferes  vivants  et  fossiles.  J.-B  Bailliere  Libr.,  Paris. 
Tome  Premier, — Texte:  Ivi  -I-  361p  Tome  Second. — .At- 
las: 144  pis, 

Sherborn,  C.  D.  1905.  Ou  tlie  dates  ot  publication  of  d  Or- 
bigny's  "Moll.  viv.  et  loss.  ",  "Paieont.  univ."  and  "Paleont. 
etrangere".  Journal  of  ConchoJogy,  11  (6):  169-170, 

Sherborn,  C.  D  1922-32  Index  Animalium  sive  index  nom- 
inum  quae  ab  AD  MDC.'CLVIII  generibus  et  speciebus 
animalium  imposita  sunt  Sectio  Secunda  A  kaiendis  la- 
nuariis,  MDCCX4  usque  ad  finem  Decembris,  MDCCCL. 
British  Museum  (Natural  Histor\  ),  Loudon,  cxlvii  -I-  7,056 
+  114p 

Sherborn,  C.  D.  and  B.  B.  Woodward,  1901  On  the  dates  of 
publication  of  the  "Histoire  naturelle  generale  et  parti- 
culiere des  moilusques  terrestres  et  fluviatiles  and  the 
"Tableaux  systematiques  des  Animaux  moilusques",  by  the 
Barons  Ferussac  and  G,  P,  Deshayes  Annals  and  Magazine 
of  Natural  History,  7  (8):  74-76, 

VVinckworth,  R  1942  Notes  on  the  publication  of  Ferussac 
and  Orbigny  s  Histoire  des  Cephalopodes.  Proceedings  of 
the  MaiacoJogical  Society.  25  (1):  34-36. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(3):104-106,  1993 


Page  104 


Alvania  valeriae  (Gastropoda:  Rissoidae),  a  New  Species 
from  off  Southeastern  Brazil 


Ricardo  Silva  Absalau 

Dcpailanu'nto  de  Zoologia 
Institiilo  df  Biologia 
Univcrsidade  F"edt'ral  do  Km 

Janeiro 
lllia  do  FundSo,  21949 
Kio  de  Janeiro,  RJ.  Brazil 


ABSTRACT 

Alvania  (Pimctulum)  valeriae  new  species,  is  found  off  the 
coast  of  Rio  de  Janeiro  and  Espirito  Santo  States,  soutlieastern 
Brazil.  It  differs  from  other  species  of  Alvania  occurring  off 
the  Brazilian  coast  in  having  more  numerous  axial  ribs  (about 
•36  on  the  body  whorl).  Axial  ribs  are  more  pronounced  than 
the  12-14  spiral  threads,  and  nodules  are  not  formed  at  their 
intersections. 

Key  words:    Gastropoda,  Rissoidae,  Alvania.  Brazil 


INTRODUCTION 

Alvania  (Punctiilum)  valeriae  new  species  was  collected 
on  the  continental  shelf  off  Rio  de  Janeiro  and  Espirito 
Santo  States,  in  ciredgings  taken  during  the  oceanograph- 
ic  operations  Espirito  Santo  I  (July  to  September,  1984), 
and  (>abo  P'rio  VII  (March  to  July  1983),  as  part  of  routine 
sampling  by  the  Brazilian  Navy  to  obtain  basic  ocean- 
ograpliic  data  on  the  coastal  and  oceanic  regions  off  Bra- 
zil. The  malacofauna  found  during  these  operations  was 
characterized  by  numerous  small  mollusks,  among  which 
the  Rissoidae  were  prominent  (Absalao,  1989). 

The  first  descriptions  of  rissoids  that  occur  off  Brazil, 
or  would  later  have  their  ranges  extended  to  Brazilian 
waters,  are  those  of  d'Orbigny  (1842),  Watson  (1886), 
who  studied  the  material  collected  by  the  H.M.S.  Chal- 
lenger, and  Dall  (1889),  who  worked  with  material  col- 
lected by  U.S.S.  Blake  (Romer  &  Moore,  1988).  Since 
1966,  malacological  material  from  off  the  Brazilian  coast 
has  been  obtained  on  a  more  regular  basis,  thanks  to  the 
dredging  operations  of  the  Brazilian  Navy  (Absalao,  1986). 
The  ininiit<-  specimens  (<  5  mm)  have  received  almost 
no  attention.  The  Rissoidae  especially  "have  proved  to 
be  very  difficult  to  classify  at  all  levels  because  of  their 
small  size,  diverse  form,  and  confusion  caused  by  con- 
vergence, especially  in  shell  characters"  (Fonder,  1985). 
Ahbcitt  (1974)  stressed  that  the  entire  group  was  in  need 


of  revision  before  species  could  be  assigned  to  subgenera. 
The  revision  of  Coan  (1964)  was  mainly  a  bibliographic 
compilation.  Ponder  (1985)  made  the  last  and  most  com- 
plete revision  of  this  family  at  the  generic  level. 

ABBREVIATIONS 

IBUFRJ  =  Instituto    de    Biologia    da    I  niversidade 

Federal  do  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Brazil. 
MORG  =  Museu  Oceanografico  da  Funda^ao  Uni- 

versidade  de  Rio  Grande,  Brazil. 
USNM  =  National    Museum    of    Natural    History, 

Smithsonian  Institution,  USA. 
MZUSP  =  Museu  de  Zoologia  da  Universidade  de 

Sao  Paulo,  State  of  Sao  Paulo,  Brazil. 
MNUFRJ  =  Museu  Nacional  do  Rio  de  Janeiro,  State 

of  Rio  de  Janeiro,  Brazil. 
MNHN  =  Museum    National    d'Histoire    Naturelle 

(Paris),  France. 

SYSTEMATICS 

Family  Rissoidae  H  &  A.  Adams,  1854 

Genus  Alvania  Risso,  1826 

Type  species:    Turbo  cimex  Linnaeus,  1758. 

There  are  three  previous!)  described  species  of  Al- 
vania that  occur  off  the  Brazilian  coast:  A.  auheriana 
(Orbigny,  1842),  A.  deliciosa  Jeffreys,  1884  and  A.  xan- 
thias  (Watson,  1885).  The  first  occurs  in  shallow  waters 
and  the  latter  two  at  greater  depths. 

Alvania  {Puncluhim)  valeriae  Absalao,  new  species 
(figures  1-3) 

Description:  Shell  minute,  1.6  to  2.4  mm  long,  white 
ovate-conic,  with  rounded  whorls.  Suture  well  impressed, 
slightly  canalicuiated.   Pri)toconch  multispiral,  smooth. 


R.  S.  Absalao,  1993 


Page  105 


with  2'/2  whorls.  Apical  angle  52-65°  Teleoconch  with 
about  3(i  gently  curved  axial  ribs  and  12-14  spiral  threads 
on  body  whorl.  Axial  ribs  override  spiral  threads  without 
forming  nodules  at  intersections.  Base  rounded  with  6- 
8  spiral  threads.  Intritacalx  present  over  entire  teleo- 
conch. Terminal  \ari\  absent.  L'mbilicus  small,  chink- 
like, well  defined.  Operculum  and  ratlula  unknown. 

Type  locality:  Off  southeastern  Espirito  Santo  State, 
southeastern  Brazil  (2U°3S'12"S,  40°16'12"W),  38  m  depth, 
22.5''C  and  36.7  ppt  salinity,  Brazilian  Naval  Research 
Vessel  Almirante  Saldanha,  station  6449,  August  23, 
1984. 

Type  material:  Holot\  pe  IBUFRJ  1726,  1.74  mm  height, 
1.02  mm  width.  Parat>pe  1,  MORG  26986  off  north- 
eastern Rio  de  Janeiro  State,  Brazil  (23°08'18"S, 
41°03'18"W),  85  m  depth,  16.7°C  and  36.2  ppt  salinity, 
Almirante  Saldanha,  station  6417,  August  29,  1984, 
1.80  mm  height,  1.04  mm  width.  Paratype  2,  USNM 
860503,  off  northeastern  Rio  de  Janeiro  State,  Brazil 
(22°35'00"S,  40°50'00"W),  depth  77  m,  19.2°C  and  36.1 
ppt  salinity,  Almirante  Saldanha,  station  6422,  August 
16,  1984,  i.80  mm  height,  1  04  mm  width.  Paratype  3, 
MZUSP  27716,  off  Rio  de  Janeiro  State,  Brazil  (23°16'50"S, 
43°02'40"W),  Almirante  Saldanha  station  6174,  depth 
92  m,  15.6°C  and  35.5  ppt  salinity,  March  29,  1983,  1.80 
mm  height,  1.04  mm  width.  Paratvpe  4.  MNUFRJ  5978, 
off  Rio  de  Janeiro  State,  Brazil  (23°16'.50"S,  43°02'40"  W), 
Almirante  Saldanha  station  6174,  depth  92  m,  15.6°C, 
and  35.5  ppt  salinity,  March  29,  1983,  2.40  mm  height, 
1.28  mm  width.  Paratype  5,  IBUFRJ  1727.  off  Rio  de 
Janeiro  State,  Brazil  (23°16'50"S,  43°02'40"W),  Al- 
mirante Saldanha  station  6174,  depth  92  m,  15.6°C, 
and  35.5  ppt  salinity,  March  29,  1983,  2.16  mm  height, 
1.20  mm  width.  Paratype  6.  MORG  27681,  off  Rio  de 
Janeiro  State,  Brazil  (23°16'50"S,  43°02'40"W),  Al- 
mirante Saldanha  station  6174,  depth  92  m,  15.6°C, 
and  35.5  ppt  salinity,  March  29,  1983,  1.88  mm  height, 
1.04  mm  width.  Paratype  7,  MORG  27682,  off  Rio  de 
Janeiro  State,  Brazil  (23°16'50"S,  43°02'40"W),  Al- 
mirante Saldanha  station  6174,  depth  92  m,  15.6°C, 
and  35.5  ppt  salinity,  March  29,  1983,  1.80  mm  height, 
1.04  mm  width.  Paratype  8,  IBUFRJ  1728,  off  Rio  de 
Janeiro  State,  Brazil  '(23°16'50"S,  43°02'40"W),  Al- 
mirante Saldanha  station  6174,  depth  92  m,  15.6°C, 
and  35.5  ppt  salinity,  March  29,  1983,  2.00  mm  height, 
1.12  mm  width.  Paratype  9,  MNHN,  off  Rio  de  Janeiro 
State,  Brazil  (23°16'50"S,  43°02'40"W),  Almirante  Sal- 
danha station  6174,  March  29,  depth  92  m,  15.6°C,  and 
35.5  ppt  salinity,  1983,  1.84  mm  height,  1.08  mm  width. 

Etymology:  This  species  is  dedicated  to  my  wife,  Mrs. 
Valeria  Gomes  Veloso. 

Range:  Records  of  A.  valeriae  are  restricted  to  the  re- 
gion between  northern  Rio  de  Janeiro  State  and  southern 
Espirito  Santo  State,  southeastern  Brazil. 

Discussion:  Alvania  colomlriana  is  compared  to  A.  val- 
eriae because  both  species  occur  in  the  same  biogeo- 
graphic  region.   However,  they  are  not  sympatric.   As 


i 


Figures  1-3.  Alvania  valeriae  new  species.  1.  Holotvpe. 
IliL'FRJ  1727;  120X,  2.  Ornanu-ntatiDn  details,  240x,'  3. 
Protoconch,  240  x. 


Alvania  is  largely  a  European  group,  comparisons  with 
those  warm-water  species  were  included 

Alvania  auheriana.  A.  deliciosa  and  A.  xanthias  have 
respectively  14,  14  and  12-14  axial  ribs,  whereas  A.  vale- 
riae has  32-40  ribs.  This  character  alone  is  sufficient  to 
discern  it  from  the  other  species  occurring  in  Brazilian 


Page  106 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  3 


waters.  In  addition,  /\.  auberiana  lias  5  spiral  threads  on 
its  teleoconch,  A.  deliciom  has  10,  A.  xanthiaa  lias  only 
4  spiral  threads  that  are  restricted  to  the  base,  whereas 
A.  valcriae  has  12-14  spiral  threads  (figures  1  and  2)  on 
its  teleoconch. 

Alvania  colombiana  Romer  and  Moore,  1988  differs 
from  A.  valeriae  in  having  only  26  axial  ribs,  which 
disappear  on  the  base  of  the  shell,  and  7-9  spiral  grooves. 
Alvania  valeriae  has  =36  (32-40)  a.xial  riblets  that  extend 
onl\  slightly  over  the  body  whorl  without  reaching  the 
umbilical  region  of  the  shell,  as  well  as  12-14  spiral 
threads. 

Alvania  porcupinae  (Jeffreys,  1884)  has  a  smooth  pro- 
toconch  very  similar  to  that  of  A.  valeriae,  =32  axial 
ribs  that  disappear  smoothly  towards  the  umbilical  re- 
gion, while  A.  valcriae  differs  in  having  =36  (32-40) 
axial  ribs  that  enter  a  little  beyond  the  edge  of  the  pen- 
ultimate whorl.  The  diameter  of  the  last  two  whorls 
increases  greatly  in  A.  porcupinae,  but  little  in  A.  valeri- 
ae. 

Alvania  zylensis  Gofas  and  Waren  1982,  and  A.  im- 
perspicna  Palary,  1920  can  be  easily  distinguished  from 
A.  valeriae  on  the  basis  of  protoconch  sculpture.  The 
protoconch  of  A.  valeriae  is  smooth,  that  of  A.  zylensis 
has  12  zigzag  spiral  lines  that  intersect,  forming  a  retic- 
ulated pattern,  while  that  of  A.  imperspicua  has  7-8 
spiral  lines  that  also  zigzag  but  do  not  intersect.  In  ad- 
dition, A.  imperspicua  has  protruding  nodules  on  the 
teleoconch,  which  are  formed  by  the  junction  of  axial 
riblets  and  spiral  lines.  In  contrast,  A.  valeriae  lacks  such 
nodules. 

Although  A.  valeriae  is  similar  in  shape  to  A.  coni- 
pacta,  this  latter  species  has  fewer  axial  riblets  (20-30) 
and  spiral  threads  (6-8)  than  the  former,  which  has  =36 
(32-40)  axial  riblets  and  12-14  spiral  threads.  Alvania 
compacta  also  has  nodules  where  axial  and  spiral  orna- 
mentation cross. 

Alvania  valeriae  is  unicjue  among  its  southwestern  At- 
lantic congeners  in  having  a  large  number  of  axial  ribs 
that  clearly  dominate  the  12-14  spiral  threads. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

1  am  grateful  to  Prof.  E.  C.  Rios  from  the  Museu  Ocean- 
ografico  da  Funda^ao  Universidade  do  Rio  Grande,  who 
has  provided  bibliographic  material.  I  am  also  much 
obliged  to  the  Laboratorio  de  I'ltraestrutura  Olular  e 
Microscopia  Eletronica  do  Instituto  de  Hiofisica  Carlos 


Chagas  Filho,  of  the  Universidade  Federal  do  Rio  de 
Janeiro  for  the  SEM  micrograph,  and  to  Dr.  Jose  Hen- 
rique Leal,  from  the  Rosenstiel  Institute  of  Marine  Sci- 
ences, and  to  Dr.  M.  G.  Harasewych  from  the  Smith- 
sonian Institution  for  their  comments  on  the  manuscript. 
This  work  was  partially  supported  by  CNPq.  grant  no. 
802240.87-9. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

Abbott,  H  T     1974     ,\nierican  Seasheiis,  2rnl  cd  \'aii  .NostraiKl 

Reinhoid,  N.Y.,  663  p. 
.\bsalao,  R.  S.     1986     Moluscos  da  Comissao  Oceanografica 

Geocosta  Rio  I,  RJ,  Brasil    Revista  Brasileira  de  Biologia 

46(1):27-31. 
Absalao,  R.  S.    1989.    Padroes  distributives  e  zoogeografia  dos 

moluscos  da  plataforma  continental  brasileira.  Parte  III. 

Comissao  Oceanografica  Espirito  Santo  I.  Memorias  do 

Instituto  Oswaldo  C^ruz  84,  Suplemento  I\ '1-6 
C^oan,  E.    1964.    A  proposed  revision  of  the  Rissoacean  families 

Rissoidae,  Rissoinidae,  and  Cingulopsidae  (Mollusca:Gas- 

tr(ipoda).  The  \'eliger  6(3)464-171. 
Dall,  W,  H.     1889,     Reports  on  the  results  of  dredging  in  the 

Gulf  ol  Mexico  (1877-78)  and  in  the  Caribbean  Sea  (1879- 

80)  by  the  U.S.  Coast  Survey  Steamer  "Blake".  29  Report 

on  the  MoUusca,  part  II.  Gastropoda  and  Scaphopoda. 

Bulletin  of  the  Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology  IS  1- 

492,  pis.  10-40. 
d'Orhigny,  A.     1842.     Mollusques,  X'of  1  (part).  In:  R,  de  la 

.Sagra  (ed).  Histoire  Plusique,  politique  et  naturelle  de 

rile  de  Cuba.  Bertrand.  Paris,  p  209-26-1  +  .\tlas.  pis.  1- 

28  4-  II  his. 
Gofas.  S.  and  A.  Waren.     1982.    Taxoriomie  de  yueiques  Es- 

peces  du  Genre  Alvania  (Mollusca,  Gastropoda)  des  Cotes 

Iberiques  et  Marocaines,  Bolletino  Malacologico  18(1-4): 

1-16, 
Ponder.  W,  F.    1985,    A  review  of  the  Genera  of  the  Rissoidae 

(Mollusca:  Mesogastropoda:  Rissoacea).   Records  of  the 

.Australian  Museum,  Su|)plenieiit  4:1-221. 
Rios,  E.  C,     1985.    Seasheiis  of  Brazil.  Museu  Oceanografico 

da  Funda9ao  I'niversidade  de  Rio  Grande,  331  p.  +  102 

plates. 
Romer,  N.  S.  and  D.  R.  Moore.    1988.    A  new  species  of  A/t)ania 

(Rissoidae)  from  the  West  Indian  Region    The  Nautilus 

102(4):  131-133. 
Watson,  R.  B      1886,     Report  on  the  Scaphopoda  and  Gaster- 
opoda collected  In   HM.S.  Challenger  during  the  \ears 

1873-1876,  Voyage  of  the  H,M,S,  Challenger.  Zoolog>  15: 

1-675;  appendix  A,  p,  677-680;  geographical  distribution, 

p   691-722;  index,  p,  723-75«;  pis,  1-50, 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


THE  NAUTILUS  publishes  papers  on  all  aspects  of  the 
biology  and  systematics  of  mollusks.  Manuscripts  de- 
scribing original,  unpublished  research  as  well  as  review 
articles  will  be  considered.  Brief  articles,  not  exceeding 
1000  words,  will  be  published  as  notes  and  do  not  re- 
quire an  abstract.  Notices  of  meetings  and  other  items 
of  interest  to  malacologists  will  appear  in  a  news  and 
notices  section. 

Manuscripts:  Each  original  manuscript  and  accompa- 
nying illustrations  should  be  submitted  in  triplicate.  Text 
must  be  typed  on  one  side  of  8'/2  x  11  inch  white  paper, 
double  spaced  throughout  (including  literature  cited,  ta- 
bles and  figure  captions),  with  at  least  1  inch  of  margin 
on  all  sides.  All  pages  must  be  numbered  consecutively. 
If  printed  on  a  word  processor,  the  right  margin  should 
be  ragged  rather  than  justified.  Authors  should  follow 
the  recommendations  of  the  Council  of  Biology  Editors 
Style  Manual,  which  is  available  from  the  Council  of 
Biology  Editors,  Inc.,  9650  Rockville  Pike,  Bethesda,  MD 
20814,  U.S.A.  The  first  mention  of  a  scientific  name  in 
the  text  should  be  accompanied  by  the  taxonomic  au- 
thority, including  year.  Latin  names  and  words  to  be 
printed  in  italics  must  be  underlined;  leave  other  indi- 
cations to  the  editor.  Metric  and  Celsius  units  are  to  be 
used. 

The  sequence  of  sections  should  be:  title  page,  abstract 
page,  introduction,  materials  and  methods,  results,  dis- 
cussion, acknowledgements,  literature  cited,  tables,  fig- 
ure captions,  figures.  The  title  page  should  include  the 
title,  author's  name(s)  and  address(es).  The  abstract  page 
should  contain  the  title  and  abstract,  which  should  sum- 
marize in  250  words  or  less  the  scope,  main  results  and 
conclusions  of  the  paper.  The  abstract  may  be  followed 
by  a  maximum  of  8  key  words.  All  references  cited  in 
the  text  must  appear  in  the  literature  cited  section  and 
vice  versa.  In  the  literature  cited  section,  all  authors 
must  be  fully  identified  and  listed  alphabetically.  Follow 
a  recent  issue  of  THE  NAUTILUS  for  bibliographic  style, 
noting  that  journal  titles  must  be  unabbreviated.  Infor- 
mation on  plates  and  figures  should  be  cited  only  if  not 
included  in  the  pagination.  Tables  must  be  numbered 
and  each  placed  on  a  separate  sheet.  A  brief  legend  must 
accompany  each  table.  Captions  for  each  group  of  illus- 
trations should  be  typed  on  a  separate  sheet  and  include 
a  key  to  all  lettered  labeling  appearing  in  that  group  of 
illustrations. 


\\\  line  drawings  must  be  in  black,  high  quality  ink, 
clearly  detailed  and  completely  labeled.  Photographs 
must  be  on  glossy,  high  contrast  paper.  All  figures  are 
to  be  consecutively  numbered  (figs.  1,  2,  3,  ...  ,  NOT 
figs.  la.  lb,  Ic,  .  .  .  NOR  plate  1,  fig.  1  .  .  .).  Illustrations 
must  be  arranged  in  proportions  that  will  conform  with 
the  width  of  a  page  (6%  inches  or  171  mm)  or  a  column 
(3'/4  inches  or  82  mm).  The  maximum  size  of  a  printed 
figure  is  6%  by  9  inches  or  171  by  228  mm.  All  illus- 
trations must  be  fully  cropped,  mounted  on  a  firm,  white 
backing,  numbered,  labeled  and  camera  ready.  The  au- 
thor's name,  paper  title  and  figure  number(s)  should  ap- 
pear on  the  back.  Original  illustrations  must  be  between 
one  and  two  times  the  desired  final  size.  It  is  the  author's 
responsibility  that  the  line  weight  and  lettering  are  ap- 
propriate for  the  desired  reduction.  Original  illustrations 
will  be  returned  to  the  author  if  requested.  Color  illus- 
trations can  be  included  at  extra  cost  to  the  author. 

Voucher  Material:  Deposition  of  type  material  in  a 
recognized  public  museum  is  a  requirement  for  publi- 
cation of  papers  in  which  new  species  are  described. 
Deposition  of  representative  voucher  specimens  in  such 
institutions  is  strongly  encouraged  for  all  other  types  of 
research  papers. 

Processing  of  Manuscripts:  Upon  receipt,  every  manu- 
script is  acknowledged  and  sent  for  critical  review  by  at 
least  two  referees.  These  reviews  serve  as  the  basis  for 
acceptance  or  rejection.  Accepted  manuscripts  are  re- 
turned to  the  author  for  consideration  of  the  reviewers' 
comments.  A  finalized  version  of  the  manuscript  is  re- 
turned to  the  editor  and  sent  to  press.  Two  sets  of  proofs 
are  sent  to  the  author  for  correction.  Changes  other  than 
typesetting  errors  will  be  charged  to  the  author  at  cost. 
One  set  of  corrected  proofs  should  be  sent  to  the  editor 
as  soon  as  possible.  Authors  with  institutional,  grant  or 
other  research  support  will  be  billed  for  page  charges  at 
the  rate  of  $60.00  per  printed  page. 

An  order  form  for  reprints  will  accompany  the  proofs. 
Reprints  may  be  ordered  through  the  editor. 

Manuscripts,  corrected  proofs  and  correspondence  re- 
garding editorial  matters  should  be  sent  to:  Dr.  M.G. 
Harasewych,  Editor,  Division  of  Mollusks,  NHB  stop  118, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution, Washington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


@  This  paper  meets  the  requirements  of  ANSI/NISO  Z39.48-1992  (Permanence  of  Paper). 


rHE  NALTILLS 

Volume  107,  Number  4 
March  16,  1994 
ISSN  0028-1344 

A  quarterly  devoted 
to  malacology. 

A*^w  ---- 

EUITOR-IN-CHIEF 
Dr.  M.  G.  Harasewych 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


ASSOCIATE  EDITOR 
Dr.  R.  Tucker  Abbott 
American  Malacologists,  Inc. 
P.O.  Box  2255 
Melbourne,  FL  32902 


CONSULTING  EDITORS 
Dr.  Riidiger  Bieler 
Department  of  Invertebrates 
Field  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Chicago,  IL  60605 


Dr.  Robert  T.  Dillon,  Jr. 
Department  of  Biology 
College  of  Charleston 
C:harleston,  SC  29424 


Dr.  William  K.  Emerson 

Department  of  Living  Invertebrates 

The  American  Museum  of  Natural 

History 

New  York,  NY  10024 


Dr.  Robert  Hershler 
Division  of  Mollusks 
National  Museum  of 
Natural  History 
Smithsonian  Institution 
Washington,  DC  20560 


Mr.  Richard  I.  Johnson 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoolog\ 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 


Dr.  Aurele  La  Rocque 
Department  of  Geology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 


Dr.  James  H.  McLean 
Department  of  Malacology 
Los  Angeles  County  Museum  of 
Natural  Histor\ 
900  Exposition  Boulevard 
Los  Angeles,  CA  90007 


Dr.  .Arthur  S.  Merrill 
%  Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 


Ms.  Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 
Harbor  Brancli  Oceanographic 
Institution,  Inc. 
Ft.  Pierce,  FL  33450 


Dr.  Donald  R.  Moore 

Division  of  Marine  Geology 

and  Geophysics 

Ro.senstiel  School  of  Marine  and 

Atmospheric  Science 

University  of  Miami 

4600  Rickenbacker  Causeway 

Miami,  FL  33149 


Dr.  Gustav  Paulay 
Marine  Laboratory 
University  of  Guam 
Mangilao,  Guam  96923 

Mr.  Ridiard  E.  Petit 

P.O.  Box  30 

North  Myrtle  Beach,  SC:  29582 

Dr.  Edward  J.  Petuch 
Department  of  Geology 
Florida  Atlantic  University 
Boca  Raton,  FL  33431 


Dr.  David  H.  Stansbery 
Museum  of  Zoology 
The  Ohio  State  University 
Columbus,  OH  43210 

Dr.  Ruth  D.  Turner 
Department  of  Mollusks 
Museum  of  Comparative  Zoology 
Harvard  University 
Cambridge,  MA  02138 

Dr.  Geerat  J.  Vermeij 
Department  of  Geology 
University  of  C^alifornia  at  Davis 
Davis,  CA  95616 


SUBSCRIPTION  INFORMATION 

The  subscription  rate  per  volume 
is  US  $25.00  for  individuals,  US 
$40.00  for  institutions.  Postage 
outside  the  llnited  States  is  an 
additional  US  $5.00  for  surface 
and  US  $12.00  for  air  mail.  All 
orders  should  be  accompanied  by 
payment  and  sent  to;  THE 
NAUTILUS,  P.O.  Box  7279,  Silver 
Spring,  MD  20907-7279,  USA. 

Change  of  address:   Please  inform 
the  publisher  of  your  new  address 
at  lea.st  6  weeks  in  advance.  All 
communications  should  include 
both  old  and  new  addresses  (with 
zip  codes)  and  state  the  effective 
date. 

THE  NAUTILUS  (ISSN  0028- 
1344)  is  published  quarterly  by 
Trophon  Corporation,  8911  Alton 
Parkway,  Silver  Spring,  MD  20910. 

Second  Class  postage  paid  at  Silver 
Spring,  MD  and  additional  mailing 
offices. 

POSTMASTER:  Send  address 
changes  to;  THE  NAUTILUS 
P.O.  Box  7279 
Silver  Spring,  MD  20907-7279 


TH  E€7NAUTI  LUS 


"Tine  Bioloaica!  Uboralofy/ 

,ole  0C3.  ■.orraphic  Institution  y^/^^^  ^Qy    J^umber  4 

'"""  March  16,  1994 

IVIAR  2  5  1994  ISSN  0028-1344 

CONTENTS 

Woods  Hois,  MA  Oi^t. 

Robert  Robertson  Protoconch  Size  Variation  Along  Depth  Gradients  in  a 

Planktotrophic  Epitonium      107 

John  I.  Scheide  Effect  of  Low  Water  Temperature  on  Ion  Balance  in  the 

Phyllis  N.  Bonaminio  Zebra  Mussel,  Dreissena  pohjjuorpha,  and  the  Unionid 

Mussel,  Lampsilis  radiata 113 

Emily  H.  Yokes  The  Muricid  T\  pes  of  Frank  Collins  Baker    118 

J.  P.  Pointier  Invasion  of  the  Rivers  of  the  Littoral  Central  Region  of 

R.  N.  Incani  Venezuela  by  Thiara  granifera  and  Melanoides 

C.  Balzan  tuberculata  (Mollusca;  Prosobranchia:  Thiaridae)  and  the 

P.  Chroseiechowski  Absence  of  Biomphalaria  glabrata,  Snail  Host  of 

S.  Prypchan  Schistosoma  inansoni        124 

Cristian  F.  Ituarte  Corbicula  and  Neocorbicula  (Bivalvia:  Corbiculidae)  in  the 

Parana,  L'ruguay,  and  Rio  de  La  Plata  Basins        129 

Book  Review    136 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(4):107-112,  1994 


Page  107 


Protoconch  Size  Variation  Along  Depth  Gradients  in  a 
Planktotrophic  Epitonium 


Roberl  Robertson 

DfpartiiU'Hl  ol  Malacolog\ 
Tlif  Acaiii-nn  ol  Natural  Sciences 
190(1  Benjamin  Franklin  Parkway 
Philadclpliia,  I'A  19103-1195,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

The  protoconch  length  of  Epiluniiim  t'chinaticuata  ranges  from 
330  to  790  M'li  '"  tliP  northern  Bahamas.  The  length  increases 
along  depth  gradients  from  near  0  m  to  40-52  m.  Intermediates 
are  from  intermediate  depths.  One  planktotrophic  species  is 
involved.  A  possible  explanation  is  given.  Svstematists  should 
be  aware  that  the  phenomenon  ma\  occur  in  other  plankto- 
trophic epitoniids  or  other  marine  prosobranchs 

Kill  nurds:    Epitiinuiiu.  [imtoconch.  size  \ariation. 


INTRODUCTION 

".  .  .  the  protoconch  may  provide  the  best  guide  to  rela- 
tionships [within  the  Epitoniidae]  yet.  Of  course  ecological 
factors  .  .  nia>  prove  to  influence  protoconch  form  (as 
has  been  established  in  other  gastropod  groups)  but  this 
remains  to  be  show  n  lor  the  Epitoniidae      Kilburn.  19iS5: 


There  is  scattered  mentinii  in  the  literature  on  marine 
prosobrancli  gastropods  of  one  species  having  proto- 
conchs  that  differ  from  shallow  and  "deep"  water.  None 
of  these  cases  seems  to  have  been  documented  with  mea- 
surements, descriptions  and  illustrations.  In  some  cases 
different  species  perhaps  were  involved. 

In  this  paper,  I  show  that  in  a  single  planktotrophic 
species  of  Epitonium  much  variation  in  protoconch  size 
occurs  in  the  northern  Bahamas.  Size  (length)  increases 
with  increasing  depth  (and  possibK  also  with  exposure 
to  wave  action).  Populations  from  Grand  i5aliama  sam- 
pled from  9,  10,  24,  and  40  m,  and  from  1  I  and  52  m 
at  Abaco  all  have  larger  protoconchs  than  do  those  from 
nearby  shallow  sites  (0-2  m). 

The  epitoniid  studied  is  Epitonium  echinaticosta  [not 
cchinaticostum]  (d'Orbigny,  1842)  [type  locality:  St. 
Thomas,  Virgin  Islands;  northern  known  limit:  Bermuda 
(.ANSP  100824);  .southern  know  n  limit:  PYrnando  de  No- 
ronlia,  off  Brazil  (Leal,  1991)].  Because  of  its  distinctive 
shell  morphology,  especially  its  variably  disjunct  anil 
commonly  "open"  teleoconch  coiling  (Rex  &  Boss,  1976), 


and  its  8-15  variably  high  and  undulate  axial  ribs  on  the 
last  whorl  (Robertson,  198.3b),  Dall  (1889)  created  for 
this  species  a  suligenus  Cycloscala,  which  has  sometimes 
been  ranked  as  a  genus. 

Species  of  Cycloscala.  w  hich  occur  in  the  Indo-Pacific 
as  well  as  the  western  Atlantic,  have  been  separated  by 
degree  of  w  horl  disjunction  and  rib  counts  by  de  Boury 
(1911),  Woodring  (1928),  Kilburn  (1985)  and  DuShane 
(1990).  Familiarity  with  a  living  population  (Robertson, 
1983a)  clearly  reveals  that  at  least  in  the  Bahamas  there 
is  just  one  species,  with  intergrades  between  the  extremes, 
as  concluded  by  C;lench  and  Turner  (1951).  They  rec- 
ognized only  one  western  Atlantic  species  of  Cycloscala, 
and  I  concur. 

In  Bahamian  £.  echinaticosta,  the  frequencies  of  the 
different  teleoconch  coiling  types  vary  little  at  different 
depths  (Robertson,  uniiublished)  and  thus  do  not  affect 
the  conclusions  here. 

There  is  already  some  inlormation  about  the  coelen- 
terate  host,  feeiling  and  reproduction  of  £.  echinaticosta 
in  the  Bahamas  (Robertson,  1983a).  At  least  in  shallow 
water,  the  host  is  the  actinian  sea  anemone  Bunodeopsis 
[or  Viatrix]  globulifera  (Duchassaing,  1850),  commonly 
living  on  the  leaves  of  turtle  grass  [Thalassia  testudinum 
(Banks  and  Solander  ex  Kiinig)]  (It  also  occurs  on  Syr- 
ingudium,  Halimcda,  Pcnicillus.  and  Acetahularia.)  The 
lower  end  of  the  bathymetric  range  of  E.  echinaticosta 
is  given  by  Abbott  (1974)  as  200  fathoms  (366  m).  Wheth- 
er living  aniinals  occur  at  that  depth,  and  whether  the 
Epitonium  remains  specific  to  B  globulifera  are  un- 
known. The  Epitonium  and  anemone  are  most  abundant 
in  the  Freeport  canals. 

How  is  it  known  that  E.  echinaticosta  is  planktotroph- 
icr*  There  is  Leal  s  inulocumented  statement  that  off  Bra- 
zil "planktotrophic  ile\  elopment  is  indicated.  More  def- 
initely,  there  is  direct  e\  idence  of  planktotrophv  at  least 
in  Bahamian  shallow  waters:  eggs  of  this  species  have 
Ijeen  shown  to  be  98-106  ^m  in  diameter  (mean  =  102 
^m;  n  =  10)(Robertson,  1983a).  Two  swimming  veligers, 
admittedK  abnormal,  were  seen  to  hatch  naturally  from 
egg  capsules  (Robertson,  1983a). 


Page  108 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


Table  I.  l.()c-alit\  data,  rt-positories  of  voui'lier.s,  ualii  {li-[)tli>  and  protocoiich  leiigtlis  of  Epitonium  echinaticosta  from  Grand 
Haliaina,  .Vbaco,  Hiinini  and  the  Berry  Is.,  all  northern  Bahamas  Data  are  arranged  in  order  of  inereasing  depth  .Abbreviations: 
.WSP  =  The  Acadenn  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia;  CR  =  Clolin  Kedfeni  collection;  GB  =  Grand  Bahama;  n  =  numbers  of 
specimens  measurable  (out  of  many  unmpasurablei 


Localities 


Voucher 

s 

n 

Depths 

(m) 

Lengths  (^m) 

(nos.) 

Means 

Ranges 

ANSP  .367 19.5  i 

369' 

■59 

16 

1 

370 

330-430 

ANSP  370.521 

2 

0-2 

380 

370-380 

ANSP  .3672.34  & 

367235 

23 

1 

410 

370-470 

CR  .3990 

1 

0-2 

4.50 

ANSP  .32-429.3 

2 

0-2 

450 

440-460 

ANSP  .32556.3 

0-2 

460 

CR  4.598 

0-2 

510 

ANSP  .372821 

0-2 

570 

CR  .398.3 

0-2 

590 

ANSP  .367 195 

11 

3-10':' 

550 

470-640 

ANSP  .370944  & 

370.^ 

i21 

9 

640 

ANSP  369074  & 

369'i 

•59 

10 

520 

CR  76.38 

11 

650 

610-740 

ANSP  .369476 

24 

670 

ANSP  368803 

40 

660 

{:R  529.5  &  5296 

3 

52 

760 

730-790 

Running  Moti  Canal,  (JB 

26°29'45"N.  78°4r45"\V 
North  Hawksbill  Creek,  GB 

26°32'00"N,  78°45'00"\\' 
SiKer  Coxp  Canal.  GB 

26''.30'30"N,  78°39'30"\V 
Treasure  Cove,  Abaco 

26°42'00"N,  77°18'20"\V 
(;hub  Cav,  Berr\  Is 

25°25'N,  77°54'\\" 
South  Bimini 

2,5°42'N,  79°17'W 
Treasure  Caw  .\baco 

26°40'00"N,  77°18'15"W 
Settlement  Point,  West  End, 

GB  26°42'15"N,  78°.59'50"W 
Sandy  Point,  .Abaco 

26°0()'15"\,  77''24'00"W 
Dead  Man's  Reef  Beach,  GB 

26°34'45"N,  78°51'45"\V 
Finders  Point,  GB 

26°30'30"N,  78°46'30"W 
Kings  Bay.  Dundee  Ba\,  GB 

26°29T5"N,  7.S°43'.30"\V 
Chub  Rocks,  Abaco 

26°43'55"N,  77°13'05"W 
Gold  Rock,  GB 

26°.30'00"N,  78°22'0()"W 
Tamarind,  GB 

26°30'45"N,  78°36'00"W 
N,  of  N.VV.  end  (Great)  Guana 

Cav,  Abaco  26°44'N,  77°09'W 


"The  hatching  shell  diameter  is  about  170  fim.  i c  much 
larger  than  the  egg,  ,  .  The  protoconch  is  about  0.3  to 
0.4  nun  long  [small  ones],  i.e  it  is  much  larger  than  the 
hatching  veliger  shell  -  proof  that  the  larva  grows  sub- 
stantialK  while  in  the  plankton 

(Robertson,  iy8.'3a).  There  might  be  geographical  vari- 
aticni,  but  the  data  from  Abaco  as  well  as  Grand  Bahama 
suggest  that  the  larger  proloconchs  may  grow  in  deeper 
water  every  vviieri'  the  species  occurs. 

In  the  literature,  there  is  already  an  indication  of  pro- 
toconch size  variation  in  another  epitoniid.  Two  .SEM 
photos  of  Epitonium  dallianum  (Verrili  &  Smith,  1880) 
protoconchs  (Bouchel  &  Waren,  I98(r  figs.  1180-1181) 
show  .some  intrapopiilational  shaix'  and  size  variation.  £. 
(lallianiirn  is  deep-water  and  aniphi-.Mlantii-  in  distri- 
bution. 

Doubt  has  been  cast  on  poecilogony  (intraspecific  vari- 
ation in  mode  of   reproduction)  occurring  in  the  Gas- 


tropoda, especially  by  Hoagiand  and  Robertson  (1988) 
and  Bouchet  (1989).  Poecilogony  usually  refers  to  plank- 
totrophy  versus  lecithotrophy .  By  extension,  lack  of  poe- 
cilogony has  been  taken  to  mean  that  gastropod  proto- 
conchs are  intraspecifically  uniform  in  both  form  and 
size.  This  paper  calls  in  cjuestion  size  specificity. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

This  study  is  based  on  68  live-collected  and  empty  shells 
from  shallow  depths  down  to  40  m  at  southern  Grand 
Bahama  island  (mainly  in  the  canals  of  Freeport),  3  emp- 
ty shells  from  .52  m  off  northeastern  .\baco,  Bahamas,  9 
maiiiK  beachworn  shells  from  shallower  depths  at  the 
same  island,  and  a  tew  also  from  Bimini  and  the  Berry 
Islanils,  all  in  the  northern  Bahamas,  all  but  the  last  two 
places  on  the  Little  Bahama  Bank  The  .52  m  station  was 
about  .'3240  m  horizontalK  Irom  the  nearest  shore. 


R,  Robertson,  1994 


Page  109 


Figures  1-2.  SEM  micrographs  ot  prolnKHK  li  and  part  nl  tflfindiich  (if:  1.  Epitoniiini  cchiiuilicDsta  Irum  less  than  2  in  (Ruiiiiiiig 
Mini  (laiial,  Freeport,  Grand  Bahama),  with  ca  3,5  prntntonch  whorls.  Protoconch  length  =  410  ^in.  Teleoconch  whorls  sutured. 
2.  £.  cchinaticosta  from  .52  m  (off  Abaeo),  with  5  protoconch  whorls.  Protoconch  length  =  770  /jm  Note  also  the  incised  axial 
grow  th  lines  on  both  shells,  an  indication  of  planktotroph\  Teleoconch  coiling  of  2  was  ojjen.  increasing  the  measured  protoconch 
length  onK  slight!).  Scale  bar  =  100  m"!  for  both  micrograplis. 


Protocoiielis  w  ere  studied  w  ith  light  and  scanning  elec- 
tron microscopy.  Measurements  were  made  to  the  near- 
est 10  fim  w  ith  the  aid  of  a  cahbrated  ocular  micrometer 
in  a  Wild  dissecting  microscope  at  x,50. 

The  anterior  end  of  the  larval  shell  is  obscured  to  a 
var>  ing  degree  b\  the  first  teleoconch  whorl,  which  may 
or  may  not  have  disjunct  coiling  begining  before,  at,  or 
after  the  protoconch  vari.x.  The  length  measuremenL 
were  made  on  the  exposed  part  of  the  protoconch,  i.e. 
as  far  down  as  the  protoconch  varix  (smaller  than  the 
first  teleoconch  rib)  can  be  seen.  Where  the  teleoconch 
becomes  disjunct  affects  the  length  data  slightly,  but  does 
not  account  for  the  differences  in  protoconch  size  re- 
ported here.  Protoconch  Is  and  first  protoconch  whorl 
diameters  were  too  corroded  to  be  measurable  accurateK 
(but  a  size  estimate  is  given  below  under  Results! 

The  originalK  '3  deep-water  shells  from  Abaco  are  in 
the  private  collection  of  Mr.  Colin  I^edfern  (one  was  lost). 
Nine  other  \()ucher  specimens  from  .\baco  also  belong 
to  Redfern.  Two  other  lots,  from  Bimini  and  the  Berry 
Islands,  are  at  The  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Phil- 
adelphia (ANSP).  The  rest,  all  from  Grand  Bahama  and 
the  Jack  N.  Worsfold  Collection,  are  also  at  ANSP. 


Data  on  each  population  studied  are  gi\en  in  Table 
1.  No  temperature  or  rearing  data  are  available.  The 
data  are  graphed  on  figure  4. 

RESULTS 

First  whorl  diameters  ol  both  the  small  and  large  pro- 
toconchs  are  100-140  /jm  (the\  approximate  the  egg 
sizes),  and  whorl  numbers  are  3.5  to  5.  Whole  protoconch 
\\  idths  of  short  and  long  larval  shells  are  all  270-310  fiin. 
Long  and  short  protoconchs  are  similarly  shaped  (figures 
1-2).  All  specimens  have  the  usual  planktotrophic  Epi- 
toniu/n  protoconch  microsculpture  (incised  axial  lines). 

Protoconch  lengths  var\  remarkabK  ;  from  330  to  990 
^m.  The  smaller  protoconchs  have  3.5  to  4  whorls  (figure 
1)  and  the  larger  ones  about  5  whorls  (figure  2).  Thus  all 
are  multispiral,  another  indication  of  planktotrophy.  On 
the  larger  protoconchs,  whorl  ruimbers  have  increased, 
not  whorl  sizes. 

The  data  from  the  two  Freeport  canal  populations 
show  that  all  protoconchs  are  very  short  but  appear  to 
be  slightly  different  from  each  other  in  size,  with  pop- 
ulations from  Running  Mon  having  protoconchs  no  Ion- 


Page  110 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


19^ 


77< 


27< 


26< 


NORTH  ATLANTIC  OCEAN 


LITTLE  BAHAMA  BANK 


50  km 


Settlement  Point 
West  End 


Dead  Man's  Reef  Beach 


North  HawksbiU  Creek ^  ^ 

"V     17   C 


to 
< 

Q 
M 
« 

o 

►J 
a. 


A 


\ 


■  South  Bimini 


GREAT  BAHAMA  BANK  (NORTHERN  END 


27  = 


26  = 


Figure  3.  Map  ol  llic  iioitlicr  ii  li;iliaiiuis,  sliouiiit;  llic  Little  Ikiliani,!  Bank.  |)art  (il   the  (in-at  Baliaiiia  Hank  ami  lli<'  Idealities  in 
Talile  I 


ger  than  430  ^ni  and  tlidSf  ftoni  Silver  Cove  no  longer 
than  470  juin. 

The  population  sampled  from  Dead  Man  s  Reef  Reach 
is  puzzling  because  it  ranges  in  protoconch  length  from 
470  to  640  ixn\,  o\('rla|)[)ing  the  largest  shallow  water 
sliell  Ironi  elsew  here  and  the  smallest  "deep"  water  shell. 
\  possible  explanation  for  the  Reef  anoinaK  is  that  the 
other  two  shallow  localities  are  in  sheltered  canals,  and 
the  Dead  Man's  Reel  is  on  the  exposed  south  coast — 
where  even  near  the  surface,  temperatures  may  be  lower, 
exposure  to  wave  action  max  l)e  greater,  and  hosts  may 
be  more  sparsely  disper.sed.  The  beach  shells  may  have 
washed  in  from  an  estimated  de|)th  of  3-10  rn  bexond 
the  near-beach  reel 

Judging  by  the  Chub  Rock  and  i'inders  Point  samples, 
enlargement  can  occur  in  water  as  shallow  as  9  and  1  1 


m  (Table  1).  The  Sandy  Point  shell  has  a  moderatelx 
large  [irotoconch  (.590 /jni  long)  which  can  be  explained 
by  the  presence  of  very  deep  w  ater  nearbx  Un  the  North- 
east Providence  Channel,  figure  3),  where  greater  ex- 
posure, colder  shallow  water  and  perhaps  sparsely  dis- 
persed hosts  can  be  expected. 

The  smallest  .Abaco  protoconch  (430 /im)  is  larger  tliaii 
the  smallest  Crand  Bahama  protoconch  (330  ^m).  The 
Freeport  canals  have  esf)eciall\  dense  populations  ot 
Bunoclcopsis  (the  anemone  host). 

DISCUSSION 

Protoconch  size  bimodalitv  in  the  .Vrchitectonicidae  is 
|)r()babl\  genetic  in  origin  (Robertson,  1970),  Since  the 
protoiiinch  enlargement  (il  Rahamian  V.pitonium  echin- 


R.  Robertson,  1994 


Page  1 1 1 


2 


4     3     4 

•    •    •  ' 


7     2     6    3     3  2 

•    •••••• 


800 


Epitonium  echinaticosta    PROTOCONCH  LENGTH  (jim) 

Figure  i.  Epiliiniiim  fcliiiialUDsln  |iriil(KijrKli  It-nullis  vtrsus  water  (lepllis.  Data  troni  Tahle  1.  The  spoli  with  iiuinbers  .sliuvv 
wliere  two  nr  iimir  data  pniiits  eciiiKule 


olicosta  at  "depth  occurs  in  two  areas  more  than  100 
km  apart  (figure  3),  an  ecological  rather  than  a  genetic 
explanation  seems  necessary. 

The  factors  most  likely  to  account  for  the  size  \  ariation 
of  lar\al  Epitoniinn  cchinaticosla  are: 

1  Duration  of  the  pelagic  lar\a!  stage.  Mo\ement  to 
and  fro  by  titlal  and  ocean  currents. 

2.  Diurnal  \ertical  migration  of  larvae  such  as  re- 
ported in  Mediterranean  Epitonium  spp.  by  Rich- 
ter  (1973,  as  Scalaria),  who  also  recorded  vertical 
distances  traversed  i)\  other  larval  taxa  in  the  order 
of  100  m 

3.  Fast  lar\  al  grow  th  in  the  w  arm  w  aters  of  the  canals, 
slower  grov\  th  near  the  cooler  surface  elsewhere, 
and  slowest  growth  at  "depth"  in  the  coolest  water. 
Scheltema  (1967)  and  Pechenik  (1984)  showed  ex- 
perimentally that  the  larval  growth  rate  in  ////- 
anassa  obsoleta  (Say,  1822)  and  Crepidula  jurni- 
cata  (Linnaeus,  1758),  two  other  prosobranchs. 
responds  to  temperature  in  this  manner. 

4.  In  the  absence  ot  metamori^hic  cues,  a  long  h\- 
pothesized  delay  period  and  continuing  grow  th  af- 
ter the  onset  of  competence.  According  to  Pechenik 
(1986),  the  lar\al  prosobranch  Bittiuin  allcinatiint 
(Say,  1822)  can  grow  from  2.8-3.0  whorls  to  3.7- 
3.8  whorls  during  the  delay  periotl.  The  minimum 
and  maximum  larval  shell  lengths  at  metamorpho- 


sis for  Crepidula  jurnicata  are  700  ^m  and  2300 
;um  (Pechenik,  1984). 

The  great  abundance  of  Bunodeopsis  glohulijcra,  the 
sea  anemone  host  of  Epitonium  echinaticosta,  in  the 
shallow,  warm  Freeport  canals  (the  artificial  equivalents 
of  mangrove  creeks)  must  be  mentioned.  Nearly  all  of 
the  live-collectetl  epitoniin7is  are  from  the  canals  There 
there  is  a  large  reproducti\e  population  of  the  Epitonium 
and  it  can  be  hypothesized  that  many  ot  the  lar\  ae  grow 
last  (in  the  warm  water),  swim  near  their  parents,  being 
moved  back  and  forth  by  tidal  currents,  and  settle  and 
metamorphose  promptK  upon  becoming  competent  (at 
small  size,  3.5  whorls). 

Outside  the  canals,  the  abundance  ot  Buncodeopsis  is 
not  known.  It  is  even  possible  that  £.  echinaticosta  has 
one  or  more  otlier  coelenterate  hosts  at  "depth."  Some 
ot  the  larvae  in  the  sea  could  have  come  out  of  the  canals 
but  it  is  also  probable  that  many  were  spawned  outside. 
These  larvae  (from  both  sources)  can  be  expected  to  drift 
into  "deep"  water  and  to  undergo  diurnal  vertical  mi- 
gration, v\  hich  would  involve  intermittent  slow  growth 
at  "depth  (cool  water),  lateral  movement  in  currents, 
and  difficulty  in  finding  host(s).  The  duration  of  the  com- 
petent period  is  believed  long,  and  large  (5-whorled) 
larxae  result. 

Thus  the  duration  of  the  pelagic  larval  stage  is  here 
considered  the  most  likeK  factor  bringing  about  the  pro- 


Page  112 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


toconch  size  variation  of  E.  echinaticosta.  But  factors  2- 
-4  listed  above  must  also  be  iinoKod. 

CONCLUSIONS 

How  widespread  is  this  kind  ot  variation  among  other 
mollusks?  Partly  allopatric  and  partK  heterochronous 
size  \ariation  in  the  "protoconth'  ot  the  thecosome 
pteropod  Clio  pyraniidata  Linnaeus,  1767  has  been  re- 
ported in  central  and  eastern  North  Atlantic  Recent 
plankton  and  Late  Pleistocene  bottom  deposits  off  north- 
west .Africa  by  Diester-Haass  and  S.  van  der  Spoel  (1978). 
They  attributed  the  variation  to  genetic  influences,  tem- 
perature differences,  and  "mi.xing  of  populations."  Size 
differences  are  smaller  than  those  recorded  here  and 
seem  not  to  be  comparable. 

Long  metamorphic  dela>  periods,  like  those  reported 
above  in  Bittiurn  and  C'repidula,  seem  a  likely  cause  for 
the  phenomenon  to  be  widespread  (little  being  known 
about  prosobranch  delay  periods). 

The  prodissoconch  sizes  of  some  bivalves  apparently 
are  controlled  by  temperature  (Lutz  &  Jablonski,  1978). 
As  they  pointed  out,  there  could  be  paleoclimatological 
(or  paleoecological)  implications. 

This  seems  to  be  the  best  documented  case  of  extreme 
intraspecific  protoconch  size  variation  in  one  plankto- 
trophic  gastropod  species,  the  variation  probably  induced 
by  differing  times  in  the  plankton  plus  a  long  delay 
period  (plus  other  factors).  The  variation  is  expressed 
batlnnietrically.  There  is  no  indication  that  more  than 
one  Epitonium  species  is  involved,  or  that  there  is  poe- 
cilogony. 

Ecophenotypic  variation  may  be  more  frequent  in 
marine  mollusks  than  currentK  realized.  Systematists 
should  be  alert  to  the  phenomenon  treated  here  and 
should  beware  of  mere  protoconch  size  differences  for 
distinguishing  planktotrophic  species. 


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  thank  Colin  Redfern,  of  Boca  Raton,  Florida,  lor  mak- 
ing the  original  discovery  antl  for  loaning  me  all  the 
s[)ecimens  from  Abaco.  I  also  acknow  ledge  extensive  use 
of  Jack  N.  Worsfold's  Grand  Bahama  collection  (now  at 
ANSP).  The  detailed  data  in  these  two  collections  made 
this  study  possible.  Dr.  K.  Elaine  Hoagland  and  partic- 
ularK  Dr  Philippe  Bouchet  made  penetrating  and  con- 
structive criticisms  Dr  (Jarv  Rosenberg  and  Helen 
DuSliane  also  made  liclplnl  suggestions. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Bouchet,  I'      1989      A  review  of  poeciiogony  in  lii'strcipods. 
Journal  ol  .Vlolluscan  Studies  55:67-78. 


Hdurhcl.  I'  .ukI  \  W  .in'-n  l9S(i  l^j'V  isjoiMil  lilt-  iiDrthea.st 
.VduiUic  ballival  and  ai)v.ssai  .Vciididae,  F.uiiniidae,  Epi- 
toniidae  (Moiiusca,  Gastropoda)  IJoiiettino  Malacoiogico 
Sn|>|)lement(i  2:299-.57(i 

(blench,  W  J  and  R  I)  Turner  1951  The  licnns  I'.pitoniinu 
ni  ihe  western  ,\tlantic.  jDlinsonia  2(:3()):2-49-2SS. 

Dull  W  H  ISWJ  Heporls  on  (Iredijiiij;  in  the  Cull  ot 
\lc\ii(i  ,iihI  in  llic  (iaribheun  Sea.  .  .bv 
the.  .  ."Ulake  .  .Heporl  on  the  Moiiusca  I'art  II. -Gas- 
tropoda and  .Scaphopoda  Bulletin  ol  the  \hi.seum  of  Com- 
parative Zooiogv  at  Harvard  College  181— 192,  40  pis. 

De  Bourv,  E.  19n.  Diagnoses  de  Scalariidae  nouveaii.\  ap- 
partenant  aux  sous-genres  Cijchncala  et  Sodiscald.  Bul- 
letin du  Museum  National  d'Histoire  Natnrelle[Paris]  17(51: 
329-331. 

Diester-Haass,  L.  and  S.  van  der  Spoel.  1978.  Lati-  Pleistocene 
pteropod-rich  sediment  layer  in  the  northeast  .Atlantic  and 
protoconch  variation  of  Cliu  pyraniidata  Liniie  1767.  Pa- 
laeogeographv,  Palaeoclimatologv ,  Palaeoecologv  2-1:85- 
109. 

DuSliane.  H  1990  liauaiian  Epiloniidaf  Hawaiian  Shell 
News  Suppiement  1:1-17. 

Hoagland.  K,  E,  and  R.  Robertson.  1988.  .An  a.ssessnieiil  ol 
poecilogonv  in  marine  invertebrates:  phenomenon  or  fan- 
tasy':' l^iological  Bulletin  17-1:109-125. 

Killiiini,  R,  N.  1985.  The  familv  Epitoniidae  (Moiiusca:  Gas- 
tropoda) in  southern  .Africa  and  Mozambique  .Annals  of 
the  Natal  Museum  27(1):  239-337. 

Leal,  J  H.  1991.  Marine  prosobranch  gastropods  I  rom  oceanic 
islands  off  Brazil.  .  .  .  Universal  fiook  Services  Dr  W 
liackhuys,  Oegstgeest,  Netherlands.  \  +  419  pp. 

laitz,  R  .A.  and  D.  Jablonski  1978,  Larval  bivalve  shell  mor- 
phometry: a  new  paleoclimatic  tool':'  Science  202:  51-53. 

Pecheiuk,  J.  A.  1984.  The  relationship  between  temperature, 
growth  rate,  and  duration  ol  planktonic  life  for  larvae  of 
the  gastropod  Crepidula  fornicata  (L.).  Journal  of  Exper- 
imental Marine  l5iologv  and  Ecology  74:241-257. 

l^eclienik,  J  ,A,  1986.  Field  evidence  for  delaved  melamor- 
pliosis  of  larval  gastropods:  Crepidula  plana  Say,  C  Jor- 
nicata  (L.),  and  Bittiuni  ahcrnaium  (Sav ).  Journal  of  Ex- 
perimental Marine  Biology  and  Ecology  97:313-319. 

Rex,  M.  .A.  and  K,  J.  Boss.  1976.  Open  coiliiii;  in  Recent 
gastropods.  Malacologia  15:289-297, 

Richter,  G.  1973.  Field  and  laboratory  observations  on  the 
diurnal  vertical  migration  of  marine  gastropod  larvae. 
Netherlands  Journal  of  Sea  Research  7:126-134,  pi    1. 

fioberLson.  R.  1970.  Svstemalics  ot  Indo-Pacific  Philippia 
(Psilaxis\  architectonicid  gastropods  with  eggs  and  voung 
in  the  umbilicus.  Pacific  Science  24:66-83. 

Robertson,  IS,  198.3a,  (.)bser\ations  on  the  lite  liistorv  ot  the 
wentletrap  Epil(niiuni  (.■cliindtiiosliini  in  the  Bahamas. 
The  Nautilus  97:98-103, 

lUibertson,  R,  198.3b,  .Axial  shell  rib  counts  as  svstrnuitic  char- 
acters m  E))ili)nium.  The  Nautilus  97:1 16-1  IS 

Scliellema,  l\.  S,  1967,  The  relationship  of  temperature  to  the 
larval  devi-lopmcnl  ol  Sassarius  ohsolctus  (.(Gastropo- 
da), Biological  Bulletin  1.32:253-265. 

W'oodring.  \V  .  I'  1928.  Mi<icene  mollusks  from  Bowden.  Ja- 
maica Part  II  (Gastropods  and  discussion  of  results  (Car- 
negie liislitiilKin  nl  \\  .isliiiigliiii  I'lililic.itioii  ,38.5:i-v  ii.  1- 
564. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(4):1 13-1 17,  1994 


Page  113 


Effect  of  Low  Water  Temperature  on  Ion  Balance  in  the  Zebra 
Mussel,  Dreissena  polij morpha ,  dwd  the  Unionid  Mussel,  Lampsilis 
radiata 


John  I.  Scheide 
l'livlli>  N.  Konaminio 

l)<|i,irlinrnl  nl    i5iiiliii;\ 
(Central  Miiliigaii  Liii\fiMt\ 
ML  I'lt-asant,  Ml  488.59  I  SA 


ABSTRACT 

Dreissrnil  pnhiiniirpha.  ai.  i  liiiiaird  In  hkiiii  U'liipcialiirc  (21 
±  1°(])  l(ir  51  (.la\s  111  artilitial  [Kiiiclualer,  f\liil)ils  liightT 
hfni(il\  iiipli  siHlium,  chloride,  potassiiiin  and  total  osniolarit\ 
than  mussels  acclimated  to  4-5°( :  (cold),  while  hemoUmpli 
calcium  was  increased  with  cold  treatment.  The  room  tem- 
perature acclimated  nuissel  hemoKmph  ion  concentrations, 
maintained  lor  51  da\s  m  artiticial  ponduater.  were  similar  to 
lliiisc  meavuretl  irom  mussels  sampled  m  the  field,  (xild-accli- 
mation  cau.scd  Lampsilifi  radiata  hemoK  mph  sodium,  chloride 
and  nsniolarity  values  to  decrease,  while  calcium  and  the  "oth- 
er ions,  presumably  bicarbonate,  increased.  The  positive  net 
sodunn  and  chloride  flux  and  the  calcium  loss  of  zebra  mu^vcK 
acclimated  to  room  temperature  w  as  reduced  upon  direct  trans- 
ler  into  cold  pondw ater  Sodium  and  chloride  net  uptakes  were 
increased  in  cold-acclimated  zebra  mussels  with  an  acute  in- 
crea.se  in  pontlwater  temperature  w  hile  calcium  and  potassium 
net  lo.ss  increased.  The  effects  of  cold  storage  on  zebra  mussels 
needs  to  be  recognized  due  to  possible  changes  in  the  ph\  si(  ilog\ 
of  the  mussel  with  this  treatment. 

Kcij  norda:  Oild-acclimation.  ion  llu\,  henioKiiipli  kui  cdii- 
centrations.  sodium,  chloritle.  cakium.  pdtassiiiin 


INTRODUCTION 

The  receiilK  introduced  zebra  nuissel,  Dreissena  poly- 
niurpha.  has  rapidly  colonized  the  Great  Lakes  Region 
(Ontario  Ministry  of  Natural  Resources,  1992).  Zebra 
mussels  torni  large  colonies  of  a  higii  density,  broadcast 
spawn,  and  have  a  vehger  dispersal  stage  that  remains 
in  the  water  column  for  several  weeks  (Hebert,  et  al.. 
1991;  Mackie.  1991;  McMahon,  1991;  Carton  &  Haag, 
1993).  Aside  from  impacting  industries  and  utilities  by 
louling  or  clogging  water  intakes  and  associated  piping 
(Mackie,  1991;  koCalak  et  ai.  1993;  LePage,  1993),  zebra 
mussels  also  impact  the  ecology  of  their  newly  e.xploited 
regions  by  decreasing  the  density  and  diversity  of  fresh- 
water bivalves  of  tiie  family  L'nionidae  (Hebert  et  al. 
1991;  Hunter  &  Bailey,  1992;  Mackie  1993)  and  by  de- 
creasing phytoplankton  availabilit\  (Leach,  1993). 


.■\ninials  in  a  freshwater  habitat  must  regulate  blood/ 
hemolymph  and  cell  ion  concentrations  above  the  en- 
vironmental concentrations.  Freshwater  bivalves,  while 
ionic  hyperregulators  for  hemolymph  and  cell  ionic  com- 
ponents, have  reduced  concentrations  of  hemolymph  and 
cell  ions  relative  to  other  freshwater  species.  This  results 
in  a  reduced  o\erall  ionic/osmotic  gradient  (Murphy  & 
Dietz,  1976;  Dietz,  1979;  Kirschner,  1991).  While  he- 
moly  nipli  ion  concentrations  are  low,  fresh  water  mussel 
sodium  ami  chloride  transport  rates  compare  favorably 
v\  ith  those  of  other  freshwater  animals  (Kirschner,  1983; 
Scheide  &  Dietz,  19.Sfr  Horohov  et  al.  1992).  The  zebra 
nmssel  is  similar  to  other  freshwater  mussels  in  such 
characters  as  relatively  low  hemolymph  ion  concentra- 
tions (Horohov  et  al.  1992).  Ion  fliix  \alues  for  sodium 
and  chloride  in  Dreissena  polyniarpha  show  a  higher 
ion  turnover  with  the  net  fluxes  similar  to  those  of  other 
fresh  water  bivalves  (Horohov  et  al.  1992). 

Current  research  protocols  for  long  term  storage  of 
zebra  mussels  in  the  laboratory  recommend  that  zebra 
mussels  that  are  not  used  immediatelv  be  maintained  at 
temperatures  below  10°C  (Reid  et  al.  1993).  The  purpose 
of  this  study  was  to  measure  the  effect  of  cold  storage 
on  ion  balance  in  the  zebra  mussel  and  compare  that 
response  to  a  representative  of  the  l'nionidae.  The  net 
ion  flux  of  zebra  mussels  was  measured  at  two  pondwater 
holding  temperatures  (room  temperature  and  cold,  4°C). 
The  effect  of  direct  (acute)  transfer  from  one  tempera- 
ture extreme  to  the  other  was  also  determined. 

MATERIALS  AND  METHODS 

Freshwater  mussels.  Dreissena  polynwrpha  (Pallas,  1771) 
antl  Lampsilis  radiata  (Barnes,  1<S23),  were  collected 
from  Lakes  Erie,  Huron  and  Michigan  with  ambient 
water  temperatures  ranging  from  1  to  17°C.  Zebra  mussel 
sizes  ranged  from  13  to  35  mm.  Zebra  mussels  were 
handled  according  to  recommended  zebra  mussel  con- 
tainment procedures  (Reid  et  al.  1993).  .All  laboratory 
water  was  of  Nanopure  grade  (Barnsteail).  Large  quan- 


Page  114 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


Table  1.  .'\  coinparisdii  of  field  collcclcd,  poridwaliT  accli- 
malfd  (51  da\s  In  llic  lahorator)  al  room  or  told  IciiiptTatures) 
zebra  mussel  lieinoK  nipli  ion  comciil rations. 

(  omciilralion  (niKq   literl 


Kooni  temp, 
pondwater 
aeelimaletl 


Cold  temp, 
pondwater 
acclimateil 


Field 
collected 


Sodium 

C;liloriile 

Potassium 

("ali'inm 

Other 

()sniolarit\" 


20.2  ±  0.4 

24.3  ±  0.9 
0.4  ±  0.1 
3.4  ±  0.1 

6.1  ±  1.6 
."i4  ±  I 


13.5  ±  1.2* 
18.0  ±  1.0* 
0.2  ±  0.03* 

6.0  ±  0.4* 

7.1  ±  1.2 
45  ±  2* 


20.1  ±  1  () 
20.4  ±  0.9* 
0.5  ±  0,1 
3.4  ±0.2 
3.6  ±  0.9 
48  ±  2* 


\alues  represent  tlie  mean  ±  the  standard  error  of  the  mean. 
*  SisnificantK  ilifferent  from  the  room  temperature  mussels 
iP  <  0.05),  n  =  8  for  Imth  field  and  room  temperature  mussels 
and  n  =  16  for  colli  temperature  acclimation  mussels. 
**  I  nils  in  mOsmole  ki;  HjO. 

titles  of  zebra  mussels  (greater  than  100)  were  placed  in 
at  least  2  liters  of  artificial  [jondw  ater  consisting  of  (niM/ 
L):  0.5  NaCl,  0.4  CaCU,  0.2  NaHC:03  ami  0.05  KCl  (Dietz 
&  Branton,  1975).  Mussels  were  divided  into  two  groups. 
One  group  was  nialntained  under  lal)orator\  conditions 
at  room  temperature  u  itii  the  water  temperature  ranging 
between  20-25°C.  The  other  group  was  maintained  at 
4-5°C  for  at  least  10  days  prior  to  u.se.  I5olli  groups  were 
maintained  under  constant  light  conditions.  Mussels  were 
not  fed. 

Mussel  hemoKniph  was  witlulrawn  from  individuals 
by  cardiac  puncture  (Fyhn  &  Costlow,  1975).  Blood  was 
centrifuged  at  greater  than  14,000  Xg  for  1  minute  (lEC 
Ontra  M).  Total  osmolarity  was  determined  using  a 
\'apor  Pressure  Osmometer  (Wescor,  model  5500)  with 
a  0,  12.5,  25,  50  and  100  mOsm/kg  H.O  standard  curve. 
Sodium,  potassium  and  calcium  were  determined  using 
flame  photometr\  (Cloleman  Model  51  Ca  Flame  Pho- 
tometer, Bacharach).  Clhloride  was  determined  using  a 
chloride  titrator  (Labconco).  All  ion  ileterminations  were 
referenced  to  commercially  prepared  standards  and  are 
expressed  as  mEq/L.  The  measured  ions  were  totalled 
for  each  mu.ssel  and  subtracted  from  the  total  solute 
osmolarity  for  each  mus.sel.  Tfie  difference  is  noted  as 
"other"  and  assumed  to  be  [jredominately  bicarbonate 
(Horohov  et  a/.,  1992). 

Zebra  mussel  net  ion  flux,  an  indicator  of  ion  balance, 
was  determined  using  the  methodolog\  of  Dietz  and 
Branton  (1975).  Nhissels  were  rinsed  in  deionized  water 
for  30-60  minutes.  The  mussels  were  then  transferred  to 
beakers  containing  10  ml  artificial  pondwater.  At  time 
zero,  an  arbitrary  time  cliosen  when  the  majoritv  had 
opened  and  were  siphoning  following  transfer,  4  ml  of 
bathing  media  were  withdrawn.  After  4  hours,  anotiier 
.sample  of  bathing  media  was  withdrawn  and  the  mussel 
ti.ssue  was  removed  from  the  shell  and  dried.  The  net 
flux  of  each  mussel  was  calculated  as  the  change  in  the 
bathing  tnedia  ion  concentration  corrected  lor  evapo- 
rative loss  divided  b\  mussel  dry  weight  and  lime.  The 


net  flux  is  expressed  as  fiEq/g'hr.  A  positive  net  flux 
indicates  that  the  influx  occurring  during  the  experi- 
mental period  was  greater  than  the  ion  efflux.  A  negative 
net  flux  indicated  that  mussel  ion  efflux  exceeded  the 
influx  for  the  experimental  periotl. 

All  values  are  reported  as  the  mean  ±  the  standard 
error  of  the  mean  with  the  sample  size  noted  (n).  The 
Students  't'  test  was  used  to  determine  significant  dif- 
ferences. 

RESULTS 

Mussels  maintained  in  both  temperature  conditions  were 
open  and  appeared  to  be  siphoning,  indicating  normal 
nmssel  behavior  patterns  in  each  acclimation  condition. 
Zebra  mussels  maintained  in  pondwater  at  room  tem- 
perature had  higher  hemolymph  sodiuiu  and  chloride 
concentrations  and  therefore  a  higher  hemolymph  os- 
molarity than  those  mussels  maintained  in  pondwater  at 
4  to  5°C  (Table  1).  The  acclimation  time  for  each  zebra 
mussel  group  was  51  days.  Hemolymph  sodium  con- 
centrations decreased  26%  in  the  cold  treatment  group 
(P<0.05,  n=8  for  the  room  temperature  group  and  n=l(j 
for  the  cold  group),  while  hemolymph  chloride  concen- 
trations decreased  33%.  Hemolymph  potassium  de- 
creased 50%  w  ith  the  cold  storage.  HemoK  mph  calcimn 
was  increa.sed  76%  in  the  cold-acclimatetl  mussels  over 
room  temperature-acclimated  mussels.  The  observed  os- 
molarity was  13%  less  in  the  zel>ra  nuissels  maintained 
at  4°C  compared  to  mussels  maintained  at  room  tem- 
perature, primarily  reflecting  the  decrease  in  hemo- 
Ivmph  sodium  and  chloride.  The  cold  treatment  did  not 
significantly  affect  the  "other"  ions,  presumabK  indi- 
cating no  effect  on  bicarbonate. 

Mussels  acclimated  51  days  at  room  teiuperature 
maintained  hemoK mph  ion  concentrations  similar  to  the 
hemolymph  concentrations  of  mussels  sampled  in  the 
field  (Table  1).  Thus,  Drcisscna  poltjmorpha  can  main- 
tain ion  balance  during  room  temperature  acclimation 
in  artificial  pondwater  with  \alues  similar  to  animals 
found  in  the  natural  envirt)nment  This  occurs  in  the 
absence  of  feeding. 

To  in\estigate  whether  the  cold  induced  change  in 
liemoK mph  ion  concentrations  was  a  specific  character- 
istic of  Drcissena  fwlyniorpha  or  common  to  other  fresh- 
water bivalves,  the  effect  of  a  10  da\,  cold  acclimation 
on  Lampsilis  radiata  was  determined  (Figure  1).  Most 
of  the  trends  observed  with  the  zebra  mussel  were  also 
observed  in  Lampsilis.  Hemolymph  sodium  in  L.  radiaia 
was  reduced  60%,  while  the  chloride  concentration  was 
reduced  75%.  Hemolymph  potassium  remained  similar 
between  the  two  treatment  groups.  Hemolymph  calcium 
was  elev ated  56%  in  /..  radiata  at  the  lower  temperature. 
Hemol\mi)h  osmolarity  was  decrea.scd  2H'"i  with  the  cold 
treatment  The  remaining  hemolymph  ionic  components 
("other"),  pri'sutnably  bicarbonate,  were  elevated  ap- 
proximately 2  fold  with  cold  treatment. 

These  data  suggest  that  at  least  some  freshwater  bi- 
valves mav  reduce  their  osmoregulatory  "set  point     in 


J.  I.  Scheide  and  P.  N.  Bonaminio,  1994 


Page  115 


t-old  It'iiipcratures  as  coiiipart'il  to  niiisscls  in  wariiuT 
teiiipt'iatiirt's  (laboratorN  tf mpt-ratures).  Tu  test  tlic  cl- 
teet  (if  an  aeute  temperature  change  on  ion  transpurt 
capabilities,  zebra  mussels  were  acclimated  to  either  2 1 
±  1°C  water  temperature  or  4°C  pondwater  temperature 
for  at  least  10  days  then  tested  at  the  other  temperature. 
Mussels  acclimateil  to  room  temperatures  \\  ere  observed 
to  have  a  significant  decrease  in  the  sodium  aiul  chloride 
net  Duxes,  in  magnitude  and  sign,  when  mo\ed  directK 
to  the  cold  water  (P<0.05.  n=  14  imissels,  room  anil 
cold  temperatures  except  for  the  sodium  flux  room  tem- 
perature nnissels  n=13.  Figure  2).  The  negative  sodium 
flu.x  indicates  a  dominant  efflux  in  the  cokl  temperature 
testing  condition  whereas  at  room  temperature  the  pos- 
itive net  sodium  flux  indicates  a  tlominant  influx.  The 
negative  sodium  net  flux  was  signiticantK  dilfcrent  from 
zero  (P<0.05,  n=  14  mussels).  The  change  in  the  net 
chloride  flux  was  similar  to  that  observed  for  the  sinliuni 
net  flux  (P<().05,  n=  14  mussels,  for  room  and  cold 
temperatures)  Interestingly,  the  tlirect  transfer  of  tfic 
room  temperature  mussels  into  the  4°(:  pondwater  re- 
sulted in  a  decrease  in  the  magnitude  of  the  calcium  loss 
(P<0.05.  n=  14,  room  and  cold  temperatures)  indicating 
a  decrease  in  the  calcium  efflux.  The  potassium  loss,  while 
being  approximateK  one  order  of  magnitude  lower  than 
the  other  ions,  w  as  significantK  less  in  mussels  transferred 
to  the  cold  (P<0.05,  n=  14,  room  antl  cold  temperatures). 
The  comparison  between  zebra  mussel  net  fluxes  ac- 
climatetl  to  cold  pondwater  antl  mussels  acutely  trans- 
ferred to  room  temperature  pondwater  was  similar  to 
those  acclimated  to  room  temperature  (Figure  '3).  Mus- 
sels, acclimated  to  the  cold  bathing  media,  had  signiB- 
cantK  lower  sodium  and  chloritle  net  fluxes  than  those 
tlirectly  transferred  to  room  temperature  (P<0.05  for 
sodium  and  chloride,  n=16  mussels  for  both  temperature 
groups).  The  sodium  and  chloride  net  Dux  in  the  cold- 
acclimated  mussels,  determined  in  the  cold  condition, 
were  not  significantK  different  from  zero(P>0.05,  n=16). 
Calcium  and  jjotassium  losses  were  increased  in  mag- 
nitude with  the  transfer  of  cold-acclimated  zebra  nnissels 
to  room  temperature  (P<0.01,  n=16  each). 

DISCUSSION 

Zebra  mussels  in  artificial  pondwater  maintained  in  lab- 
oratory conditions  without  being  fed  had  hemoKniph 
ion  values  close  to  hemolymph  values  of  mussels  collected 
from  the  field.  However,  mussels  maintained  in  cold 
pondwater,  tor  the  same  time  period,  lost  sodium  and 
chloride  with  a  resulting  net  reduction  in  hemolyni))li 
osmolarity.  The  loss  of  sodium  and  chloride  from  Dreis- 
scna  pulyinorpha  and  Lampsilis  radiata  was  similar  to 
the  effect  of  salt  depletion  (Murphy  &  Dietz,  197(i;  Scheide 
&  Dietz,  1982).  Vet,  the  cold  acclimated  mussels  were 
in  a  medium  that  had  sufficient  ions  for  mussels  to  main- 
tain sodium  and  chloride  balance  at  a  warmer  tein|X'r- 
ature. 

Sodium  and  chloride  net  fluxes  usually  were  positive 
in  room  temperature  acclimated  zebra  mussels.   How- 


vww  Willi  acute  Iranslci  nl  rooiii  temperature-accli- 
mated zebra  mussels  to  cold  poiulvvater,  mussels  lost  .so- 
tliiim  and  chloriile  The  loss  of  sodium  and  chloride, 
observed  in  the  cold  pondwater  treatment,  was  reflected 
in  the  reduced  hemolymph  sodium  and  chloride  con- 
centrations observed  with  cold  pondwater  acclimation. 
Metabolic  activit\,  measureil  as  o\\gen  consumption,  of 
zebra  mussels  is  reduced  w  ith  ctilder  water  temperatures 
(McMahon  &  Alexander,  1991;  Quigley,  Gardner  &  Cor- 
don, 1993).  The  apparent  loss  of  sodium  and  chloride 
observed  in  the  room  temperature-acclimated  zebra 
mussels  w  hen  transferred  to  colli  pondwater  may  be  re- 
lated to  reduced  metabolic  acti\it\ .  However,  long  term 
acclimation  of  zebra  mussels  to  cokl  pondwater  resulted 
in  a  reduction  of  the  net  soilium  and  chloride  loss  to 
values  close  to  zero.  The  change  in  ion  loss  attribiiteil  to 
zebra  mussel  cold  storage  may  be  the  result  of  a  decreased 
ionic  gradient  due  to  the  animal  loss  of  sodium  and 
chloride  or  may  be  due  to  changes  in  epithelial  ion  trans- 
piirt  and  ion  permeabilitv ,  thus  the  mussels  become 
"tighter  to  the  loss  of  ions.  Cold  acclimated  mussels, 
transferred  back  tu  the  room  temperature  pondwater 
exhibited  a  positive  net  Dux  for  sodium  and  chloride. 
Thus,  the  ion  transport  mechanisms  necessary  for  reg- 
ulating sodium  anil  chloriile  balance  were  present  in  the 
cold  acclimated  zebra  nmssels  but  their  activity  was  re- 
duceil  in  colli  |ionilwatt'r 

All  net  ion  fluxes  stuilieil  varied  with  temperature  re- 
gime. Zebra  nnissels  not  only  exhibited  decreased  sodium 
anil  chloriile  net  fluxes,  but  decreases  in  magnitude  of 
calciinn  and  potassium  net  fluxes.  At  room  temperature, 
both  calcium  and  potassium  net  fluxes  were  negative. 
The  artificial  pondwater  useil  in  this  investigation,  while 
fulK  compatible  for  maintaining  unionid  mussels  (Dietz, 
1985)  and  zebra  mussel  hemoK  mph  for  extended  periods 
of  time,  may  not  be  the  best  medium  for  zebra  mussels. 
The  calcium  loss  indicates  that  this  bathing  medium  is 
negati\el\'  influencing  calcium  balance.  Even  with  the 
calcium  efflux,  liemoK mph  calcium  values  do  not  change 
at  room  temperature,  thus  calcium  is  presumably  being 
mobilized  from  the  shell  to  maintain  a  relativeh'  constant 
hemolymph  calcium  value 

Even  with  the  negative  net  calcium  flux  observeil  in 
the  zebra  nui.s.sel,  hemolymph  calcium  concentrations 
increased  as  the  hemolymph  osmolarity  decreased.  He- 
molymph calcium  also  increased  in  the  unionid,  L.  ra- 
diata. during  cold  ponilwater  conditions.  The  rise  in 
hemolvmph  calcium  concentrations  in  cold  acclimated- 
nuissels  mav  be  assisted  by  the  ilecrease  in  the  net  cal- 
cium loss  at  the  lower  tem|)erature.  The  elevation  of 
hemolymph  calcium  has  been  noteil  with  the  decrease 
in  hemoKniph  soilium  in  imioniils  (Scheide  &  Dietz, 
1982).  Only  in  L.  radiata  did  the  "other"  ions  increase 
with  cold  acclimation.  Similar  changes  have  been  ob- 
served in  the  unionid,  Ligumia  subrostrata  (Say)  un- 
ilergoing  ihloriile  de|iletion  (Scheide  &  Dietz,  1982). 
C^okl  ponilwater  storage  of  mussels  causeil  an  increase  in 
calcium  levels  concomitant  with  the  decrease  of  sodium 
levels   suggesting   that   compensatory   mechanisms,   al- 


Page  116 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


Room 

TemoefatLre 


I         I   Cold 

Tempefa'LTe 


Rocn 
Temperattre 


I         I    Cold 

TernoeraTure 


CZ]  c. 


jj 

Figures  I -.'{.  ('(iiiipari.sdiis  111  llic  t'ftfit'- cil  temperature  im  Ion 
concentations  in  Larnpsilis  radiata  and  Dreissena  polijmorpha. 
I.  I  leiiiiiK  iTipli  ion  (.iiiicentratidns  cii  L(2nipsilis  ratluita  alter 
a  10  (la\  aeeliniatidii  period  to  room  temperature  (21  ±  1°(^ 
solid  liar)  and  cold  temperature  (4  ±  1  °C:,  liatehed  bar)  K'll) 
refers  to  the  potassium  value  multiplied  l)y  10  for  comparison 
purposes.  "Other  relers  to  the  difference  between  the  mea- 
sured total  .solute  and  sum  of  the  measured  ion  values,  as  noted 
in  the  Materials  and  Methods  section  and  indicates  the  he- 
molymph  bicarbonate  concentration.  The  capped  lines  indicate 
the  standard  error  of  the  mean.  Sigiiilicanl  ilifferences  are  de- 
noteil  v\ilh  a  •  representing  P<0  ().5  with  n  =  (S  for  room  and 
cold  lemperalure-accliinated  mussels  2.  Kffectsof  direct  trans- 
fer of  2I°(:  ±  \°C  acclimated  zebra  mussels  to  4°( :  on  the 
sodium,  chloride,  calcium  and  potassium  net  fluxes  The  po- 
tassium net  flu.x  is  increased  10  fold  lor  comparatiM'  purposes 
(K*10).  The  room  temperature  acclimated  nuissel  net  flu.x  is 
denoted  by  the  solid  bar  {n=  14  mussels  toi  all  i^mups  except 


tliougli  not  completely  effective  in  maintaining  room 
temperature  osmolarity,  were  acli\f  in  llie  cold-aceli- 
mated  mtis.sels. 

Freshwater  animals  iia\c  set  points  lor  liemoixnipli 
blood  sodimn  and  chloride  (Kirschner.  1991 ).  \lo\ement 
of  zebra  mussels  from  the  natural  en\ironinenl  to  the 
laboratory  does  not  appear  to  negatively  effect  the  mus- 
sels for  at  least  51  days.  The  formulation  of  artificial 
pondw  ater  appears  to  be  suitable  for  tlie  laborator\  niain- 
tenante  of  zebra  mussels.  Zebra  mus.sels,  held  at  room 
temperature,  maintained  hemolymph  ion  values  close  to 
the  collection  hemolymph  ion  values,  although  the  mus- 
sels were  in  a  negative  calcium  balance.  The  mussel 
holding  time  in  the  laboratory  may  be  increased  by  plac- 
ing the  mussels  in  cold  pondwater  and  zebra  mussel 
storage  at  a  cold  temperature  is  recommended  for  lab- 
oratory housing  of  zebra  mussels  not  immediately  being 
used  tor  studies  (Held,  ei  al.  1993).  However,  the  ion 
concentrations  after  holding  may  be  depressed,  partic- 
ularly with  a  longer  cold  holding  period  and  the  lack  of 
feeding.  Changes  in  mussel  plu  siology,  due  to  cold  stor- 
age, need  to  be  recognized  as  lurther  research  is  per- 
formed to  understand  the  basic  biology  of  the  zebra 
mussel. 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 

This  work  was  funded  by  a  Research  E.xcellence  Fund 
grant  #42865  from  the  State  of  Michigan  to  JIS.  The 
cooperation  of  Consumers  Power  is  greatly  appreciated. 
We  thank  Thomas  Dietz,  Stexe  Donner,  Ron  Fobes  and 
Harokl  SiKerman  tor  the  critical  re\  icw  ol  this  manu- 
script. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Diet/.  T  II  1979.  Uptake  of  sodium  aiKJ  chloride  In  fresh- 
water mussels.  Canadian  Journal  of  Zoology  .37:1.56-160. 

Dietz,  T.  H.  1985.  Ionic  regulation  in  freshwater  rimssels:  .\ 
brief  review,  .\merican  Malacological  Bulletin  3:233-242 

Dietz,  T.  H.  and  W.  D.  Brantoii.  1975.  Ionic  regulation  in 
the  freshwater  mussel.  Liguinia  subroslruta  (Sav).  Jmirrial 
ol  (;oin|)arati\e  PInsiiilogx   104: 19-26. 

l\liii,  II  .iiiil  I  n  t'ostliiw  1975  .Vnaerobic  sampling  of 
l)iid\  nuids  in  l)i\al\e  molluscs.  Comparative  Biochemistry 
and  Physiology  52A:265-268. 

Carton,  D  W  and  W  IV  Haag.  1993  Sea.sonal  reproductive 
iNcles  and  settlement  patterns  of  Drcissaia  palyiuorpliu 


lor  the  sodium  group,  n=13l  and  the  coltl  net  llux  is  denoted 
b\  the  hatched  bar  (n  =  14  mu.ssels  for  all  groups).  Signihcant 
flux  differences  are  denoted  by  •  tP<0.05)  3.  Effects  of  direct 
transler  of  4  ±  1°C^  acclimated  zebra  mussels  to  21°C  on  the 
sodiimi,  chloride,  calcium  and  potassium  net  fluxes  The  po- 
tassiiini  net  flux  is  ini'ieased  10  lold  for  comparative  purposes 
(K- 10).  The  cold-acelimalcd  net  flux  is  denoted  b\  the  hatcheil 
bar  (11  =  16  mussels)  and  the  room  temperature  nuis.sel  net  flux 
is  denoted  In  the  solid  bar  (n=16  mus.sels).  Significant  lliix 
differences  arc  denoted  In   •  (P<0.05). 


J.  I   Scheide  and  P.  N.  Bonaminio,  1994 


Page  117 


in  \\  t'stcrn  Lake  Erif  //r  Nalcp.i  T  1'  amlD  \\  S(  lilocs- 
ser  it'ds. ).  Zebra  mussels:  Biolog).  UTii)aets  ami  nuitKil 
t:RC:  Press,  Inc.  Boca  Raton,  FL,  p,  1  I  1-12.S 

Hebert.  P.  D.,  C.  C.  Wilson.  M.  H  Miirdoeh  and  b  i.a/ar 
1991.  Deniograpli)  and  ecological  impacts  nl  tlic  m\ad- 
ini;  mollusc  Drcissvna  pdhjiiKiiiilid  (:anadiati  JoiuTiai  ol 
Zoolot;\  W). 405-409 

Horohov.  J  .  H  Silverman.  J  W  Lynn  and  T  H.  Diet/  1992 
Ion  transport  in  the  freshwater  zebra  mussel,  Dreissena 
pnhjmorpha.  Biological  Bulletin  1(S3:297— 'jOo 

Hunter.  H.  D  and  J,  F.  Bailey.  1992.  Dreissena  ixilynuirphu 
(Zebra  nui.s.sel):  Colonization  of  soft  substrata  and  some 
effects  on  I  iiionid  bixaKes.  Tlie  Nautilus  lOtit-iO-fiT 

Kirschner,  L  B  I9S.'5,  Sodium  and  chloritle  absorption  across 
thelxHb  surface:  Frog  skin  and  other  cpilhrli.i  \mcricaii 
Journal  of  Physiologv"244:R429-H443 

Kirschner,  L.  B  1991.  \Vater  and  Ions  //i;  I'rosscr.  ( :  1.  led.) 
Comparative  .Animal  Phvsiologv.  l-'ourlh  I'dition  l"n\i- 
ronmental  and  Metabc}|ic  Animal  l'h\si(il(ig\  \\dc\- 
Liss.lnc.  Neu  York.  p.  13-107 

Kovalak.  \V.  P..  C,  D.  Longton  and  U  H  Simlhrr  1993 
Infestation  of  power  plant  uatcr  s\ stems  b\  the  zebra 
nmssel  [Dreissena  polymurplia  Pallus)  In:  Nalepa.  T  F 
anil  U.W  Schloesser  (eds. ),  Zebra  uurssels:  Biologv .  im- 
pacts and  control  t"RC-  Press.  Inc.  Boca  Raton.  FL  ji  359- 
3S0. 

Leach.  J.  H.  1993.  Impacts  of  the  zebra  uuissel  [Dreissena 
pohjmorpha)  on  water  quality  and  fish  spawning  reefs  in 
western  Lake  Erie.  In:  Nalepa.  T  F  and  D  W  Schloesser 
teds.).  Zebra  mussels:  Biologv.  unpads  and  control.  CRC 
Press.  Inc.  Boca  Raton.  FL.  p.  381-397 

LePage.  W,  L  1993.  The  impact  of  Dreissena  pulyniurpha 
on  waterworks  operations  at  Monroe,  Michigan,  .A  case 
histor\./;i.  Nalepa,  T.  F.  and  D.W  Schloesser  (eds.)  Zebra 
mu.ssels  Biolog\ ,  impacts  anti  i-oritrol  CIU:  Press.  Inc. 
Boca  Raton.  FL.  p.  333-358. 

Mackie.  C;  L,  1991.  Biologv' of  the  exotic  zel)ra  unis.sel.  nrci.s- 
,sf/ia  pohjmorpha.  in  relation  to  native  bivaKes  and  its 
potential  impact  in  Lake  St  Clair  Hvdrobiologit  a  219 
251-268. 


Mackie.  (..  1.  199:)  Biolog\  ol  the  zebra  uuissel  [Dreissena 
polilinorplia)  anil  observations  ot  uuissel  colonization  on 
unionid  bixalves  in  Lake  St  Clair  of  tlie  Great  Lakes  In: 
Nalepa.  T  I"  ami  l.).\\.  Schloesser  (eds.).  Zebra  nuissels: 
Biologv.  iiupactsand  i-onlrol  (4U,'  Press.  Inc.  Boca  Raton, 
FL.  p.  153- Kio 

McMahon,  R.  F.  1991  Mollusca:  Bivalvia.  /;;.  Thorp.  J  H. 
and  .\.  P.  Covich  (eds.)  Ecology  and  classification  of  North 
American  freshwater  invertebrates  .\cademic  Press,  Inc., 
NY.  p.  315-399. 

McMahou.  H  F  and  J  F  Alexander  1991  Respirator)  re- 
sponses to  temperature,  h\po\ia  and  temperature  accli- 
mation in  the  zebra  mussel,  Dreissena  pohimorpha  i  Pall  I. 
.\mericaii  Zoologist  3174.^ 

Murpln.  W  A  and  4'  II  Dietz  1976  The  effects  of  salt 
depletion  on  blood  ami  tissue  ion  concentrations  in  the 
freshwater  mussel.  I.iiiuinia  subrostrata  (Sa\ ).  Journal  of 
Comparative  Plusiologv   108:233-242. 

Ontario  Ministrv  ol  Natural  Resources.  1992.  Zebra  mus.sel 
distribution  Mmistrv  ol  Natural  Resources.  Ontario.  Can- 
ada, December.  1992 

Quigley.  M.  A.,  W.  S.  (;ardner  and  W.  M.  Cordon  1993. 
Metabolism  of  the  zebra  mussel  [Dreissena  pohjmorpha) 
in  Lake  St.  (Mair  oi  the  (Jreat  Lakes,  h\:  .Nalepa.  T  F  and 
D.  W.  Schloes.ser  (eils. ).  Zebra  mussels:  Biologv.  impacts 
ami  control.  C;RC:  Pres.s,  Inc,  Boca  Raton,  FL,  p.  295-306. 

Reid.  L^  F  .  J  Biduell,  J  Carlton,  L.  Johnson,  E,  Mar.sden  and 
S.J  Nichols  1993.  Zebra  mussel  containment  protocols. 
NO.-\A  Sea  (Jraiit  Office  and  L'S  Eu\  ironmental  Protection 
.Agencv .  20  pages. 

Scheide.  J  I  and  T  II.  Dietz.  1982.  I4ie  effects  ot  indepen- 
dent S(idium  and  chloride  depletion  on  ion  balance  in 
freshwater  mus.sels.  (-an.iduin  Journal  of  Zoologv  60  1676- 
1682 

Scheide.  J  I  ami  4"  11  Dictz  19S6.  Serotonin  regulation  of 
gill  c.WIP  proiliictioii.  ,Na,  and  uater  uptake  in  freshwater 
mussels  Journal  ol  l-Aperimental  Zoology  240:309-314. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(4):118-123,  1994 


Page  118 


The  Muricid  Types  of  Frank  Collins  Baker 


Emily  II.  Yokes 

(^f(il(ii;\   l)c|);ir(iiicnt 

riiluiif  I  iiiversit) 

New  Orleans,  LA  70118-5698,  USA 


ABSTRACT 

in  llif  lirsl  leii  scars  ol  lii.s  scit'iililic  caret-r  V X',  Baker  iiaiiu-d 
nine  ta\a  in  the  faiiiil)  Muricklae,  Of  these  only  one,  Haus- 
tcllutn  ruhidus  (named  as  Murcx  mcs.soriiis  var.  ruhidum).  is 
here  eonsidered  \ahd     \ll  others  are  synonyms  ol  older  names. 

Key  uardf.:    Miirieidae,  (Gastropoda,  VX'..  Haker 


INTRODUCTION 

Tlie  name  Frank  C  Baker  is  very  familiar  to  workers 
among  land  and  fresli-water  mollusks,  i)iit  for  tfie  first 
ten  years  of  his  professional  life  lie  thought  ot  himself 
as  an  expert  in  marine  mollusks,  especialK  the  Muricidae, 
Of  his  first  21  papers,  published  between  1888  and  1897, 
only  two  (1895b,  1897b)  are  on  non-marine  Mollusca, 
His  first  publication  (1888)  was  a  note  describing  the 
marine  mollusks  collected  along  the  coast  of  Massachus- 
sets. 

In  the  "(General  Notes"  of  The  Nautilus  (3:46),  it  was 
staled  that  "Mr.  F  (L  Baker,  formerly  of  Providence,  R.I., 
is  pursuing  his  studies  at  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences 
ol  I'hiladelpliia.  He  spent  the  months  of  January  to 
April,  1889,  in  Brevard  County,  Florida,  and  from  this 
experience  came  a  diverse  set  of  notes  on  the  marine 
mollusks  (1889a),  on  the  feeding  habits  of  birds  (1889b), 
including  the  identification  of  a  number  of  mollusks  eat- 
en by  said  birds,  and  on  the  habits  of  the  muskrat  (1889c). 

The  first  molluseaii  species  he  described  was  Ocinehra 
jcnksii  (Baker,  I889d)  and  in  1890  when  the  American 
Association  ol  (^oncliologists  was  initially  annoimced  (77k' 
Nautilus,  3:140-143),  among  the  charter  members  listed 
was  "F.C.  Baker.  Academy  Natural  Sciences.  Philadel- 
phia. Muricidae ."  His  second  taxonomic  paper  (Baker, 
lS9()a)  was  also  on  a  muricid,  with  the  redescriptidu  ol 
I'rosalpinx  perrugatus  ((Conrad,  184(j) 

Among  his  most  important  contributions  to  the  IkkK 
of  molluscan  know  ledge  are  his  series  ol  seminal  papers 
on  the  i)rotoii)nchs  of  tiic  Muricidae  (Baker,  18901),  IS9ld, 
1894)  and  other  marine  gastropods  (Baker,  1897c),  to- 
gether with  several  catalogues  of  the  species  ol  Muricidae 
(Baker,  1891e,  1895c,  1897a). 

In   1894  he  moved  to  (Chicago  to  beconu'  the  lirst  v\\- 


rator  ol  mollusks  at  the  newly  constructed  Academv  of 
Sciences  (see  Baker,  1895a),  a  position  he  held  for  the 
next  20  years  (Franzen,  1958:30),  and  it  is  only  then  that 
his  interests  turned  to  non-marine  mollusks,  beginning 
with  an  important  paper  (1895b)  on  the  transport  of  land 
and  Iresh-water  mollusks  by  means  of  birds,  fish,  etc. 
(possibly  the  first  report  of  "ducks  w  ith  dirty  feet  trans- 
porting embryonic  shells).  Although  he  published  three 
more  papers  (1895c,  1897a,  1897c)  on  marine  mollusks, 
alter  1898  lie  never  again  digressed  from  non-marine 
lauiias. 

In  the  time  that  he  was  study  ing  muricids  Baker  de- 
scribetl  nine  new  taxa,  only  four  of  which  (those  in  the 
1891d  work)  were  figured.  For  the  most  part  these  species 
have  been  ignored  by  subsecjuent  workers.  Keen  (1971: 
554)  noted  that  Ricinula  rugosoplicata  Baker  is  a  syn- 
onym of  Buccinum  lugubre  C.B.  Adams,  1852,  and  Yokes 
(1971)  atteni])ted  to  assign  the  species  to  generic  taxa. 
w  ith  varying  degrees  ol  success  (see  below  ).  Radw  in  and 
D'Attilio  (1976)  did  nothing  with  the  species,  e.xcept  to 
list  two  as  "species  of  uncertain  identity"  (Intuherculatus 
and  jenksi  [sic\  p.  217).  Only  two  taxa  named  as  "va- 
rieties have  ever  been  the  subject  of  any  discussion: 
Murex  haustclluin  var.  longicaudus  and  Murex  mes- 
sorius  \ar.  ruhidum. 

In  a  monograph  on  the  Indo-Pacific  species  of  Chi- 
coreus  Iloiiart  (1992,  fig.  371)  refigured  the  holotype  of 
Murex  (Chicoreus)  bitidjerculatus.  from  the  collection 
of  the  Chicago  Academy  of  Sciences.  This,  combined 
w  ith  an  on-going  study  on  the  species  of  Ergalataxinae, 
to  which  I  susix'cted  certain  of  Bakers  species  nright 
belong,  caused  me  to  contact  Mr.  Ron  \  asile.  Curator  of 
Mollusks  at  the  (Chicago  Academy,  and  through  him  1 
arranged  to  borrow  the  t\  pe  material  ol  these  little  known 
taxa.  To  complete  the  study  1  also  contacted  the  Academy 
of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadel])liia.  where  four  aildi- 
lional  t\  pes  were  located,  and  the  Wagner  Free  Institute 
of  Science.  Philadelphia,  w  hich  supposedly  had  one  ty  pe 
lot  that  could  not  be  located. 

Because  these  taxa  are  so  poorly  known,  it  seems 
worthw  hile  to  present  all  ot  them  in  one  place,  and  they 
are  listed  below  in  chronologital  order  as  originally  de- 
.scribed.  UnfortuiuiIcK ,  most  \no\r  to  be  synonyms  of 
presiousK   described  species.   l''\cri  though  this  is  not  a 


E.  H.  Yokes,  1994 


Page  119 


"rt'visionarx  work,  lietause  tlifre  are  multiple  speci- 
mens of  certain  ot  tlie  ta\a,  it  seems  aiK  isihie  to  ciesi^nate 
lectot\pes.  It  is  unlikely  that  most  ot  the  taxa  will  ever 
he  treatetl  in  an\  strictK   moiiot;raphic  work, 

SYSTEMATIC  :S 

Ocinchra  jcuLsii 
Figures  1,  2 

Ocinchra  jcnksii  Baker,  l.S89ci:S() 
'■'I'riisdipinx  jctiksii  (Baker).  \'okes:122. 

Habilal:  I  nknown. 

Lectolype:  ANSP  36099  (here  desiiinated)  (fig.  1). 

Paralectolypes:  CAS  20696'  (fig.  2);  ?WFIS  (ru.t  toniul). 

Discussion:  Baker  compared  O.  jcnk.'-iii  lo  the  Cahlor- 
nian  species  Occncbra  circumtcxta  Stearns,  1S72,  i).  gra- 
cilliiita  Stearns,  1S72,  and  O.  inicliacli  Ford,  1888,  sug- 
gesting that  he  perhaps  thought  it  might  also  be  from 
California.  However,  examination  of  the  twe)  extant  type 
specimens  indicates  that  it  is  an  elongate  form  of  the 
xariable  common  southern  .Australian  Lcpsivlhi  rinosa 
(Lamarck,  1822)  (see  fig.  3), 

In  the  original  description.  Baker  (1889d:81)  noted 
that  there  were  four  specimens  "obtained  from  the  Wag- 
ner Collection  at  the  Wagner  Free  Institute  of  Science. 
A  search  of  the  collections  of  the  Institute  did  not  unco\  er 
any  specimens  but  at  the  Academ\'  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelphia,  where  Baker  worked  at  the  tii7ie,  there 
is  a  specimen  (ANSP  36099;  height  16.5  mm,  diameter 
9.5  mm)  labeled  as  "syntvpe"  that  nearly  matches  the 
cited  dimensions  ("Alt.  17,  diam.  10  mm").  This  speci- 
men is  designated  as  the  lectotype.  There  is  one  para- 
lectotype  (CAS  20696)  in  the  collections  of  the  Chicago 
Academy  of  Sciences,  which  is  slightK  smaller  (height 
15.1  mm,  diameter  8.3  mm).  The  fate  of  the  two  addi- 
tional paralectot\  pes  is  not  known. 

Murcx  haiistclluin  Linne  var.  lungicaudit^ 
Figure  4 

Murcx  htiuslcUum  Linne  var.  longicaudus  Baker,  IS9li):5(i. 

Ilau.slvlluni  longicaudm  (Baker),  \'okes,  1971:6(1 

Not  Hau.stellum  Umgicaudnni  [.sic]  (Baker).  Kaiclier,  1973,  2  1 21 

(=  H.  kurodai). 
Not  Hatistcllum  longicaudus  (Baker).  Fair,  I97():55,  fig.  50  (  = 

//   kiirod(ii) 
llaiislclliiiu  haustclluni  iHiiislclliini  (ijnrie)   PDiuier  and  \'llkt•^. 

19,SS,S(i.  tigs    4W:.  4(SD  ('■h(ili.t\p<-"(lccl(.t\|)cjnl  //    !,„i- 

gicdtidlist 
Hauslelluiii  huiislclluni  longicaiidiis  iBakcri    llcmart.    1990; 

332,  figs.  12,  13,  29. 


'  Bcith  till'  Chicago  At-adeni\  ot  Sciences  and  the  Caliturnia 
At-adenu  ot  Sciences  use  the  abl)re\  iation  "CAS  lor  specinu-n 
Itifiitilieation.  In  every  case  in  this  paper  tiie  reterenee  (]AS  is 
til  ihi'  Cliicagd  .\cadeni\  nt  Sciences. 


Habitat:  Red  Sea 

Lectolype:  ANSP  60965  (here  designaled). 

Paralectolype:  CAS  2070!  (fig.  4). 

Discussion:  Most  authors  (e.g.,  Radwin  &  D  Attilio,  1976: 
49;  Ponder  &  Vokes,  1988:86)  have  considered  this  "va- 
riety" to  be  a  synonym  of  typical  Murex  hausteUiim. 
Howe\er,  Houart  (1990:332)  has  expressed  the  opinion 
that  the  differeuct's  in  the  nature  of  the  protocorich  be- 
tween Haustclluni  Iwustcllurn  s,s.  (see  Ponder  &  Vokes, 
1988,  fig.  78D;  Houart,  1990,  fig.  31)  and  forms  from 
the  Indian  Ocean  named  longicaudus  (see  Houart,  1990, 
fig.  29)  and  Haustcllum  sp.  (Houart,  1990,  fig.  32)  in- 
dicate three  distinct  species.  Given  that  all  three  have 
protoconchs  of  2  to  2.5  whorls  and  the  major  difference 
is  in  the  whorl  shape,  ranging  from  rather  conical  in  the 
t\  pical  Indo-West  Pacific  form,  to  cylindrical  in  the  East 
.African  form  {Haustclluni  sp),  to  somewhat  bulbous  in 
the  Red  Sea  form  {longicaudus),  his  argument  is  not 
especially  compelling. 

The  differences  in  teleoconch  morphology  are  less  be- 
tween these  three  forms  than  between  the  typical  //. 
Iiaustclltini  s.s.  and  populations  named  as  //.  kurodai 
(Shikama,  1964)  and  H.  vicdani  Kosuge,  1980  (see  Pon- 
der &  Vokes,  19S8,  figs.  87A-C;:  kurodai.  vicda7ii,  and 
haustclluni  s.s.,  respectively),  thus  it  is  probable  that  the 
Indian  (Jcean/Red  Sea  populations  represent  only  mor- 
phological variation  as  v\ell. 

In  the  original  description  Baker  (1891b:56)  stated  that 
he  had  three  specimens  of  this  variety,  one  of  which  was 
in  tlie  collections  of  the  Academv  of  Natural  Sciences  of 
Philadelphia  and  "two  are  in  my  collection."  The  spec- 
mien  in  the  collections  of  the  Philadelphia  Academy 
(ANSP  60965)  is  here  designated  as  the  lectotype  and 
the  one  (fig.  4)  in  the  Chicago  Academ\  of  Sciences  (CAS 
20701 )  is  a  paralectolype.  I  do  not  know  w  here  the  third 
specimen  is  today, 

Ocinchra  pilshryana 
Figures  5-7 

Ocinchra  rdshniana  Baker,  1S911).57. 
?Ur()salpinx  piUliryaua  (Baker),  Wikes,  1971:125, 

Habitat:  ('e\lon 

Lecioiype:  ANSP  60307  (here  designated)  (fig.  5). 

Paraleclotypcs:  CAS  20699A  and  20699B  (figs.  6,  7). 

Discussion:  Raker  stated  that  this  species  "has  features 
recalling  the  genera  Troplion,  Vrosalpinx.  and  Sistrum" 
(1891b:58)  and  he  is  not  the  only  person  who  has  had 
difficult)'  placing  it.  Examination  of  the  type  specimens 
(figs.  5-7)  shows  it  to  be  a  subjective  synonvm  of  Er- 
galatax  contracta  (Reeve,  1846).  which  also  has  been 
attributetl  to  several  different  genera  b\  other  authors: 
Buccinuni  contractuui  Reeve,  1846;  Murcx  calcareus 
Dunker,  I860;  L'rosaliiinx  innofahilis  E.A.  Smith,  1879; 
Pcntadactylus  cctjlonicuui  Preston,  1909;  and  Morula 
martcnsii  Dall,  1923. 


Page  120 


THE  NAUTILUS,  \ol.  107.  No.  4 


13b    '^M 


Fifjurch  1,2.  (hinclmi  jcnk.sii  Baker  I.  ANSP  .■>W)99  (lectotxpe);  height  16.5  mm.  localit)  unknown  (X  3).  2.  (^\S  20696  (para- 
InldUpe);  height  1.5.1  mm.  locahty  mikiiowii  (X  S).  3.  LcpsicUa  vinoaa  (Lamarck),  TAM  C:  167197;  height  8.2  mm.  Hecherehe 
Ba\,  Tasmania.  Australia  (X  4).  !•.  Murcx  haiislclliirii  \ai  longiniudns  Baker,  C'.\S  20701  (paralectotype);  height  49,7  mm.  Red 
Sea  (X  2,1.  5-7,  Cktiichra  pilshnjiina  Baker.  5.  ANSI'  60:507  (leef(it\  pe).  height  15  5  nmi,  Cieylon  (X  3),  6.  CAS  20699  (paraieetot)  pe 
A);  lieight  16,0  mm.  Ceylon  (X  .3,).  7.  CAS  20699  (paraleel<)tv|)e  B);  heigiit  14.4  mm,  Ceylon  (X  3).  8,  <^.  Ricinula  iSislrum) 
rugusuplicala  Baker.  8.  A.N'SB  61306  (leelolype);  height  1  1 .7  mm.  Turtle  Ba\ .  Lower  California  (X  3).  9.  C;AS  20703  (paraieetot)  pe); 
heiglit  11.0  mm.  Turtle  Bay.  Lower  California  (.X  3).  10.  Miircx  (Chirorcus)  hituhcrculatu.s  Baker,  C.\S  20702  (holotype);  height 
31.7  mm.  Australia  (X  2).  11.  Ocinchra  wanliana  Baker,  C.\S  20698  (holotype);  height  12  5  mm,  ".Australia"  (X  3).  12.  Ocincbrina 
aciculata  (Lamarck),  Vokes  C^oll.;  height  10.6  imn,  off  Bota,  Spain  (X  3).  LJ.  Ocinebra  rubra  Baker,  C.'\S  20697  (holotype);  height 
10.7  mm,  locality  unknown  (.X  3).  14.  Orcncbra  clalhrata  (Dall).  Vokes  Coll.;  height  10.0  nmi,  off  Hollester  Banch,  California,  15 
m  (X  3)  1.1.  Murex  nicssorius  var.  rubidum  15aker,  I  SNM  87S003;  height  30  5  mm,  Anna  Maria  Ke\,  Florida,  46  m  (X  2)  16. 
17.  Purpura  iThalfssa)  problcrualica  Baker.  16.  CAS  2()704A  (lectotx  pel:  height  -30  9  mm,  jafian  (X  21  17.  CAS  20704B  (para- 
ieetot) pe):  height  22.8  mm,  Japan  (X  2) 


E.  H.  Yokes,  1994 


Page  121 


Often  eited  as  a  another  s\n(in\ni  is  Ergalalax  rcciir- 
rens  Ireclale.  1931,  named  astNpeot  tlie  genus  (ami  hence 
contracta  is  usualK  cited  as  the  t>pe  species  of  Ergala- 
tax):  however,  E.  recurrens  is  not  the  same  as  £.  con- 
tracta but  is  a  synonym  of  Miirex  pauper  Watson,  1883, 
which  is  thus  the  correct  name  for  the  type  of  the  genus 
Ergalatax  Iredale,  1931. 

There  was  no  comment  on  the  nurnl)er  of  specimens 
in  the  original  type  lot.  There  is  one  specimen  (fig.  5)  in 
the  collections  of  the  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  of 
Philadelphia  (ANSP  60307),  which  is  here  designated  as 
the  lectot\  pe;  two  additional  specimens  (figs.  (3,  7)  at  the 
Chicago  Academy  of  Sciences  (C^.AS  20699)  are  desig- 
nated as  paraleetot\  pes. 

RicinuUi  (Sisfnnu)  rugusuplicata 
Figures  8,  9 

Ruutula  iSistriiiu)  rugusoplkata  liaki-r.  l.S91b:58 

Habitat:  Turtle  I5a\,  Lower  C'alilornia. 

Lectolype:  ANSP  61306  (here  designated)  (fig.  8). 

Paraleclolype:  CAS  20703  (fig.  9) 

Uisrussion:  Keen  (1971:554)  included  R.  rugoaoplicata 
in  the  s>  nonynn  of  Buccinutu  lugnhrc  (IB.  Adams,  1852, 
now  placed  in  the  Ocenebrine  genus  Trachypollia  and 
not  Morula  {Morunella),  as  Keen  reported.  There  are 
two  specimens  in  the  type  lot,  one  at  the  Academy  of 
Natural  Sciences  of  Philadelphia  (fig.  8)  and  one  at  the 
Chicago  Academy  of  Sciences  (fig.  9).  leaker  (1891b:58) 
says  "this  pretty  little  shell  was  found  in  a  collection 
recently  purchased  by  the  Conchological  Section  of  the 
Academy  of  Natural  Sciences  from  Mr.  Henry  Hem- 
phill"; therefore,  the  Philadelphia  specimen  (ANSP 
61306)  is  here  designated  as  the  lectotype. 

Murex  (Chicorcus)  hituhcrculatus 
Figure  10 

Murex  [Chicorcus)  Itiluhcrculatu.^  Baker,    l.S9Ul:133,  |)l.    II, 

fig.  4. 
Chicorcus  hituhcrculatus  (Baker).  N'okes,  1971:24, 
Murex  hituhcrculatus  Baker.  Fair,  197(i:26;  Houart,  1992  l()(i, 

fii;.  371  (li(il(il\  pe). 

Habitat:  ,\ustralia. 

Holotype:  CAS  20702  (fig.   10). 

Discussion:  F"air  (1976:26)  was  the  first  to  suggest  that 
M.  bitubercuUitus  is  a  juvenile  specimen  of  Chicoreus 
capucinus  (Lamarck,  1822).  Examination  of  the  holotype 
shows  that  she  was  correct.  .Although  the  localitv  "Aus- 
tralia at  first  seems  misleading,  C.  capucinus  does  occur 
in  the  tropical  mangrove  areas  of  northern  Australia. 


Ocinchra  uardiana 
Figure  11 

Ocinchra  uardiana  Baker.  1S9U1  134.  pi    11,  fig.  5. 


(Jcinchnna  uanluma  (Baker)   NUkcs.  1971   127;  Fair,  197(i:S(S, 
tii;   l).">  (,illrr  B.iki-r). 

Habitat:  "Australia. 

Holotype:  CIAS  20698  (fig.   11 ). 

Discussion:  F]vidently  the  erroneous  locality  of  "Austra- 
lia convinced  Baker  (1891d:134)  that  this  species,  al- 
though "having  a  superficial  resemblance  to  Ocinebra 
aciculata  Lam.,  '  was  to  be  distinguished  by  its  larger 
size,  more  ileveloped  umbilical  region,  and  its  \ellow 
color,  differing  from  the  "light  rosy  Mediterranean  spe- 
cies Ocinehrina  aciculata  (Lamarck,  1822).  True,  this 
gerontic  example  is  larger  than  most  specimens  of  O. 
aciculata  liut  l^adwin  and  D'Attilio  (1976:125)  cite  16 
mm  as  maximum  height  for  this  species;  they  alsf)  note 
that  the  color  ranges  from  orange-brown  to  red-brown 
to  purple-lirow  II.  Comparison  of  the  type  of  O.  wardiana 
to  a  typical  Mediterranean  example  of  O.  aciculata  (fig. 
12)  fails  to  shf)\\  an\  significant  differences.  Nothing  like 
it  has  ever  been  recognized  from  .Vustralian  waters. 

Ocinchra  ndmi 
Figure  13 

Ocinchra  ruhra  Baker,  1891d:134,  pi    11,  figs.  6,  7 
Ocinehrina  ruhra  (Baker).  Yokes,  1971. 12(x  Fair,  197(i:73,  fig. 
52  (alter  Baker). 

Habitat:  Lnknowii 

Holotype:  CAS  20697  (fig.  13), 

Discussion:  ,\lthough  compared  by  Baker  to  Favartia 
alvcata  (Kiener,  1842)  and  F.  pcasci  (Tryon,  1880),  the 
only  resemblance  is  the  development  of  deep  pits  formed 
by  the  intersection  of  the  axial  and  spiral  ribs.  Baker 
(1891d:135)  iurther  noted  "it  has  some  resemblances  to 
the  figures  of  Ocinchra  intcrfossa  Cpr."  and  here  he  is 
much  closer  to  the  truth.  In  fact,  the  same  form  (see  fig. 
14)  was  later  named  Tritonalia  intcrfossa  var.  clathrata 
by  Dall  (1919:324;  holotype  figured  In  Bormann,  1946, 
pi.  4,  fig.  2;  Fair,  1976,  fig.  315;  Kaicher,  1978,  no,  1615). 
If  one  considers  this  a  valid  species,  then  Baker's  name 
is  the  correct  one  to  use.  Most  w  orkers,  however,  consider 
the  form  to  be  a  synonym  of  Ocenebra  atropurpurea 
Carpenter,  1865  (lectot>pe  figured  b>'  Bormann,  1946, 
pi.  4,  fig.  8;  Palmer,  1958,  pi,  23,  figs,  2,  3,  13;  Fair,  1976, 
fig.  316;  Kaicher,  1978,  no.  1627),  which  originally  was 
named  as  a  variety  of  the  common  California  species  O. 
interfossa  Carpenter,  1864  (holotype  figured  by  Bor- 
mann, 1946,  pi.  4,  fig.  10;  Palmer  1958,  pi.  23,  fig.  1; 
Fair,  1976,  fig.  318;  Kaicher,  1978,  no.  1614).  Ocenchra 
rubra /clathrata  is  no  more  than  a  shouldered  form  of 
O.  atropurpurea,  and  both  are  simply  clathrate  varieties 
of  the  O.  interfossa  complex. 

Purpura  (Thalessa)  prohlcmatica 
Figures  16,  17 

Purpura  [Thalessa)  ]nijhlcnuilu(i  \\.iki-c  lS91tl  135,  pi   11.  figs. 
2.  3. 


Page  122 


THE  NAUTILUS,  \'ol.  107.  No.  4 


Habitat:  Japan  [Sfta  coast,  Japan,  jiilc  I-'ranze'ii,  1958:34, 
f  11)111  lal)fl  with  .spciiiJifii.s]. 

Leclotype:  CAS  207()4A  (ilcsi^iialcd  l)\  l-'raii/fii,  1958: 
34)  (fig.  17). 

Paralec-totype:  C:AS  2070  IB  (fig.  10). 

Dii^cu^sion:  Iriasimicli  as  /'.  pnihlcmulica  is  uiujiiestioii- 
ahl\  a  .sv'iioiiyin  of  the  common  Japant-sc  specii'S  Purpura 
rlavigcra  Kiister,  1800,  one  can  only  assume  that  Baker 
was  misled  by  Trvon  (1880:163),  who  clismissed  P.  cla- 
vigera  as  "a  depauperate  iorni"  of  P.  tumulom  Reeve, 
1846,  the  species  to  which  Baker  compared  prohlema- 
lica.  Baker  (I891d:136)  further  added  that  "this  species 
is  well  figured  on  pi  46,  f.  48  of  the  second  volume  of 
Tryon's  Manual,  which  is  a  reproduction  of  the  shell 
Lischke  (1869,  pi.  5,  fig.  15)  figured  as  P.  tiitnulosa  Reeve. 
The  latter  is  not  Reeve's  species  l)ut  the  nodulose  form 
of  P.  clavigera,  as  Lischke  demonstrates  in  his  series  of 
illustrations  (1869,  pi.  5,  figs.  12-l(i).  Both  morpiiotvpes 
have  been  well  figured  In  Kaicher  (1980,  no.  2481). 

Reeve's  species  P.  lunuilofia  is  a  synonym  of  Thais 
(Tenguella)  marginalha  (Blaiinilie,  1832),  a  widespread 
Indo-Pacific  species  that  does  occur  in  eastern  Africa,  and 
Reeve  s  locality  ot  "Zanzibar"  is  probabiv  not  erroneus, 
as  suggested  by  Tryon.  Members  of  the  P.  clavigera 
com[)lex  have  been  placed  in  the  subgenus  Thais  (Re- 
ishia)  Kuroila  and  Halx',  1971,  type  species:  Purpura 
hrunni  Dunker,  1860. 

There  were  said  to  be  12  specimens  in  the  type  lot, 
two  ol  which  were  figured  in  the  original  description. 
I-'raiizen  (1958:34)  selected  the  larger  of  tliese  (Baker, 
1891d,  pi.  1 1,  fig.  3)  as  the  lectots  pe.  Both  specimens  are 
figured  liere  (figs.  16,  17). 

Murex  messnrius  var   riilndmu 
Figure  15 

Manx  mcssorins  var   nilnihiiii  Hakcr,  IS^^Hil  l.iT  iinulf  iianic 

list  only);  1897a;377 
Murcx  (Murex)  rertirviroslns  nihuliis  I5akfi ,  ( ^Iciiili  .iiid  Perez 

Farfaiite,  1945:6,  pi.  .),  figs.  1-7  (figs.  1.  2  iectol\pe). 
Murex  (Murex)  ruhidus  Baker.  Yokes,  196;11(),S.  |)1,  4.  fig.s,  .'j,  4. 
Munx  ruhidus  Baki'r    Nukes,  1971:92;  Radwiii  ami  D'Mlilio, 

1976:71,  pi.  11,  hg,   15;  Fair.  1976:7:3,  fig.  40. 
Haustelhun  ruhidus  (Bakerl    \  (ik<'s.  1990:17.  pi.  1,  tig    12 
Murex  ruhidus  paniiiuicus  I'rliKli.  199062,  fig.  8. 

Habitat:  (  ledar  Ke\s,  Florida. 

Lertotype:  Harvard  M(;Z  147272  (designated  In  Clench 
and  Perez  Farfante,  1945:8). 

Discussion:  This  is  the  most  w  idcK  recognized  ol  leaker's 
taxa,  and  was  only  inadvertantly  named  In  Baker,  wlm 
credited  the  varietal  name  to  ball  (1889:196).  In  that 
reference  Dall  describes  the  Florida  specimens  of  Murex 
/nessorius  as  'often  of  a  deep  ro.se-color  .  .  .  less  hooked 
and  spinose  than  the  discolored  specimen  figured  b\ 
Reeve  [1845,  pi.  22,  fig.  90,  which  is  a  good  example  of 
typical  rnessoritis]"  However,  nowhere  does  Dall  men- 


tion the  word  "ruhiduni"  and  the  name  must  date  to 
Baker  s  1897  usage,  w  here  he  does  gi\e  a  description  of 
sorts  ("the  shell  being  of  a  deep-pink  color,"  1897a:377), 
which  together  with  the  Florida  localitv'  is  sufficient  to 
identify  the  species 

(Jeiich  and  Pc-rez  Fartante  (1945:8)  recognized  the 
Florida  form  as  a  valid  subspecies  of  the  Pacific  reeur- 
virostris  Broderip,  1833,  changing  "ruhiduni"  to  the  or- 
thographically  correct  ruhidus.  and  noting  that  the  spe- 
cies is  not  onl\  pink  but  comes  in  "cream,  pink,  pale 
orange,  salmon,  or  even  red  and  some  specimens  possess 
darker  color  bands  at  the  shoulder  and  base  of  the  body 
w  horl. 

Althougli  generally  confined  to  the  Florida  and  Ba- 
hamian areas,  specimens  also  occur  in  the  Ba\  Islands  of 
Honduras,  the  northern  coast  of  South  America,  and 
Panama  (see  Vokes,  1990:17).  The  latter  have  been  sep- 
arated as  a  geographic  subspecies  by  Petuch  (1990:62, 
fig.  8). 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

I  wish  to  thank  Ron  Vasile,  Curator  of  Mollusks  at  the 
Cyhicago  Acadenn  ol  Sciences,  for  making  a\ailable  the 
types  in  their  collection.  Gar\  Rosenburg,  Earle  E.  Spa- 
mer,  and  David  S.  Wiedner,  all  ol  the  Academv  of  Nat- 
ural Sciences  of  Philadelpliia,  located  and  loaned  tvpe 
material  from  their  institution.  Eugene  .\.  13olt,  Jr.,  of 
the  Wagner  Free  Institute  of  Science,  Philadelphia,  was 
most  helpful  in  attempting  to  track  down  the  types  of 
O.  jenksii,  said  to  he  in  their  collections.  Ian  Loch,  the 
Australian  Museum,  kindK  provided  the  figured  speci- 
men of  Lepsiella  vinusa,  as  well  as  considerable  help  and 
hospitalitv  during  in\  1988  visit  to  the  .\ustralian  Mu- 
seum. 

ABBREVIATIONS  OF  REPOSITORY  COLLECTIONS 

ANSP  -  Academy  of  Natural  Sciences.  Philadelphia, 
Pennsylvania,  USA 

CAS  -  Cliicago  Acadenu  oi  Sciences.  Chicago.  Illinois, 
L'SA 

MCZ  -  Museum  ot  C^omparative  Zoolog) .  Harvard  Uni- 
versitN.  (-ambridge.  Ma.s.sachu.ssets,  USA 
TAM  -  The  Australian  Museum,  Svclney.   New  South 
Wales,  Australia 

USNM  -  National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smith- 
sonian Institution,  Washington,  D.(>.,  USA 
\\  I'lS  -  Wagner  Free  Institute  ol  Science,  Philadelphia, 
I'ermsv  Kania,  I  S.\ 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Baker.  F,  C,     ISSS,    |(  )ii  a  icillcrlinu  Irip  Id  ( )iisel  Bay.  Mass.]. 

rlir  ( :(inilinl(igisl's  Exclian.ge  2(9):!  19. 
li.ikcr,   I-    C      ISSOa,     Notes  dm  Floridaii  siiclls.  The  X.iutilus 

.■5(5):5;5-54, 
Baker.  F    ('      IS.SOli      Nolrs  mi  the  lood  ol   hirtls    rrorreiliiigs 

ol   .Vi'.ulciiiv   ol   X.iliiral  Sciences  of  Pliilaclel|iliia   11:266- 

270. 


E.  H   Yokes,  1994 


Page  123 


Baker,  F.  C,     18S9c,    Remarks  upon  tin-  rdUiKl-Uiilcil  iniiskial, 
Neofiher  alleni.  True.  Procedings  nl  Aciilcriu  dl  \,ihir.il 
Sciences  of  Philadelphia  41:271-273 
Baker,  I""  (;     IcS.SQd,    De.scriplioii  of  a  iiru  -.[H'ck-sdl  Ociitchra 

The  Nautilus  .3(7):.S0-N1 
Haker,  P'.  C;,    189()a.    Reniarksou  I  rosalpiiix  pcniifialiis  (.'.mir 
Proceedings  of  .-KcademN  of  Natural  Sciences  of  Philadel- 
phia 42;4(i-47;  reprinted  vcrhatuii  ni  The  N.mlilu--  4l,'5); 
29-30. 

Baker,  F.  C.  f  890b.  On  the  modibcation  ol  the  apex  in  Munx 
Proceeding  of  .Acadeni)  of  Natural  Sciences  ot  Philadel- 
phia 42:66-72. 

Baker,  F  CI.  1890c.  .\  catalogue  of  conchological  alilire\ia- 
tions   The  Nautilus  4l8):89-91 

Baker,  V  C  1891a.  Notes  on  a  collection  ot  shells  Ironi  south- 
ern Mexico.  Proceedings  of  .\cadeni\  of  Natural  Sciences 
of  Philadelphia  4,3;45-.5o 

Baker,  F  (.'.  18911).  1-leinarks  on  the  Mmicitkie  with  descrip- 
tions ol  new  species  of  shells.  Proceedings  of  .Acadeiii\  ol 
Natural  Sciences  of  Philadephia  43:.56-61. 

Baker,  F.  C;.  1891c.  [continuation  of]  A  catalogue  of  concho- 
logical abbreviations.  The  Nautilus  4(10)T  1.5-1 17. 

Baker,  F  (.'.  1891d.  Descriptions  of  new  species  of  Muricidae, 
with  remarks  on  the  apices  of  certain  forms  Proceedings 
ot  Rochester  .-Vcadem)  of  Science  1  129-137.  i)l    1  I 

Baker.  F.  C  1891e.  Catalogue  and  s\iionym\  of  the  Recent 
species  of  the  famiK  Muricidae.  Proceedings  of  Rochester 
Vtademy  of  Science  14.53-172. 

Baker.  V.  C.  1892.  Notes  on  a  collection  ol  shells  Ironi  the 
Mauritius,  with  a  consideration  of  the  genus  Magilus  of 
Montfort.  Proceedings  of  Rochester  .Acadenn  of  Science 
249-40,  pi   9 

Baker,  F.  V.  1.S94.  Further  notes  on  the  eml)r\onie  whorls  of 
the  Muriciilae.  Proceedings  of  the  Acadein\  ot  Natural 
Sciences  of  Philadelphia  46:223-224 

Baker,  F.  C.  1895a.  A  glance  at  the  Chicago  .\cadem\  of  Sci- 
ences. The  Nautilus  8tl0):109-lll, 

Baker,  F.  C.  1895b.  The  geographical  distribution  of  the  [land 
and  fresh-water]  Mollusca.  Science  (New  Series)  2(33):  179- 
183. 

Baker,  F.  C.  1895c.  Prelniiinarx  outline  of  a  new  classihcation 
of  the  famiK  Muricidae.  Bulletin  of  the  C^hicago  Acadenn 
of  Sciences  2(2)169-189. 

Baker,  F.  C:  1897a  Critical  notes  on  the  Muricidae.  Transac- 
tions of  the  .\cadem\  of  Science  of  St.  Louis  7(16):371- 
.391. 

Baker,  F  C:.  1897b.  On  a  collection  of  mollusks  from  Crand 
Tower,  Illinois.  The  Nautilus  1 1(3):28-.30. 

Baker,  F,  C.  1897c.  On  the  modification  of  the  apex  in  gastropod 
mollusks.  .Annals  of  New  York  .Academx  of  Sciences  9:685- 
704,  pis.  18-20, 

Bormann,  M.  1946.  .A  survey  of  some  West  .American  Oce- 
nebras,  with  description  of  a  new  species.  The  Nautilus 
60(2):.37-43,  pi.  4. 

Clench,  W  J  and  I  Perez  Farfante.  1945  Phe  genus  Murcx 
in  the  western  .-Vtlantic.  Johnsonia  I(17):l-58,  pis,   1-29 

Dall,  \\  H  1889.  Reports  on  the  dredging,  under  the  su- 
pervision of  Alexander  .\gassiz,  in  the  Gulf  of  Mexico 
(1877-78)  and  in  the  Caribbean  Sea  (1.879-80),  In  the  IS. 
Coast  Survey  Steamer  "Blake.  Lieut. -C^ommander  (^D 
Sigsbee,  L.S.N.,  and  Commander  JR.  Bartlett,  Ll.S.N., 
commanding  X.\I.\  Report  on  the  Mollusca;  Part  II,  Gas- 
tropoda and  Scaphopoda.  Bulletin  ot  Museum  of  C.om- 
parative  Zoology  at  Harvard  C:ollege  18:1-492.  pis.  111- 
40. 


Dall.  \\  II  1919  Deveriplions  of  new  species  of  Mollusca 
Ironi  the  north  PaciticOce.ui  in  the  collection  of  the  L'uited 
States  National  Museum  Proceedings  of  the  II. S.  National 
Museum  .56(2295)  29.3-37  I 

Franzen,  D,  S.  1958  T\  pes  ol  molhisks  described  b\  1"  C 
Baker  -  Part  III.  (Chicago  .\cadein\  ol  Sciences.  The  \.ui- 
tilus  72(l):.3()-34 

Fair.  R.  1976.  The  Murcx  book,  an  illustrated  catalogue  of 
Recent  Muricidae  (Nhiricinae,  Muricopsinae.  Ocenebri- 
nae).  Priv.iteK  published.  Honolulu.  Hawaii,  138  pp..  23 
pis. 

Houart.  R,  1990  New  l,i\a  .irid  new  recorils  ot  Indo-Pacilic 
species  ot  .\/i/rc.v  and  lluiistclliuu  (CJastropotla.  Muricidae, 
Miiricinae)  Bulletin  tin  Museum  .National  d'Histoire  Na- 
turelle,  Paris  (Ser.  4)  12  (.sect.  A)  (2):329-347. 

Houart,  R  1992.  The  geiuis  Chicoreus  and  relatetl  genera 
(Gastropoda:  Muricidae)  in  the  Indo-West  Pacific.  Me- 
moires  tlu  Museum  National  d'Histoire  Naturelle,  Paris, 
Zool.  v.(A)  1.54:1-1.88, 

Kaicher,  S  I^  1973  Card  catalogue  of  world-wide  siiells, 
Pack  no  2  -  Muricidae.  Part  I,  nos.  99-195.  Privately 
published,  St    Petersburg,  Floritla. 

Kaiilier,  S  D  1978  (lard  catalogue  of  workl-wiile  shells. 
Pack  no  16  -  Muricidae,  Part  HI,  nos.  1540-1646  Pri- 
\atel\  published,  St    Petersburg,  P'torida 

Kaicher,  S  D  1980  tlard  catalogue  of  world-wide  shells. 
Pack  no  24  -  Thaididae.  Part  1.  nos.  2392-2497  Privately 
published.  St,  Petersliurg.  Florida 

keen.  .\  M  1971  Seashells  of  tropical  west  America.  Marine 
molhisks  from  Baja  (."alifornia  to  Peru.  Second  Edition. 
Stanford  I  niversitv  Press.  Stanford,  California.  \i\  +  106-1 
pp.,  22  color  pis. 

Lisclike,  t;.  F.  1869.  Japanische  Meeres-Concli\  hen.  \olunie 
1    Theodor  F'ischer,  C^assel,  192  pp  ,  14  pis 

Palmer,  K.  \'.  W.  1958.  Type  specimens  of  marine  mollusks 
described  by  P.P.  Carpenter  from  the  West  Coast  (San 
Diego  to  British  Columbia).  Geological  Society  of  .America, 
Memoir  76.  376  pp..  35  pis.,  frontispiece. 

Petucli,  E  J  1990  .\  new  molluscan  faunule  trom  the  Ca- 
ribbean coast  ol  Panama.  The  Nautilus  104(2):57-71. 

Ponder,  W.  J  and  E.  H.  X'okes.  1988.  A  revision  of  the  Indo- 
West  Pacific  fossil  and  Recent  species  of  Miirex  s.s.  and 
Haiislclluiu  (Mollusca:  Gastropoda:Mnricidae).  Recordsof 
the  .Australian  Museum.  Supplement  81-160 

Radwin,  G.E  and  A.  D'Attilio  1976.  Murex  shells  of  the 
world;  an  illustrated  guide  to  the  Muricidae.  Stanford  llni- 
versity  Press,  Stanford,  California,  284  pp.,  .32  pis. 

Reeve,  L.  \.  1845-1846.  Conchologia  Iconica,  v.  3,  Murex, 
3«  pis.  (pis.  1-34  issued  Apr  to  Oct.,  1845;  pis,  .35,  36 
issued  Apr,,  1846) 

Tryon,  G.  W  18.80  Manual  ol  (>'onchology,  structural  and 
s\  stematic,  w  itli  illustrations  of  the  species,  v.  2,  Muricinae, 
Purpnrinae   Pliilatlelphia,  Pennsv  Kania,  289  pp.,  70  pis. 

\  likes    E    H      19(i3.     Cenozoic  Muricidae  of  the  western  .At- 
lantic region.  Part  I  -  Murcx  s  s  Tiilane  Studies  in  Geologv 
1(3):  9.3-12.3,  pis.  1-4. 

\  okes,  E  H  1971,  Catalogue  of  the  genus  Murex  Linne 
(Mollusca:  Clastropoda);  Muricinae,  Ocenebrinae  Bulletins 
of  .American  Paleontologv  61(268):l-l  41 

\okes.  E.  H.  1990  Ceuo/oic  Muricidae  of  the  western  .At- 
lantic region  Part  \  111  -  Murcx  ss,  Hauftlcllum.  Chi- 
coreus, and  Ilcxa))lcx,  additions  and  corrections.  Tulane 
Studies  in  Geologv  anti  Paleontologv  23(l-3):l-96,  pis.  1- 
12.  ' 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(4);124-128.  1994 


Page  124 


Invasion  of  the  Rivers  of  the  Littoral  Central  Region  of  Venezuela 
by  Thiara  granifera  and  Melanoides  tiiberculata  (Mollusea:  Pros- 
obranchia:  Thiaridae)  and  the  Absenee  of  Biomphalaria  glabrata, 
Snail  Host  of  Schistosoma  mansoni 


J.  p.  Pointier 

l„il)i>rjl(iirr  dv  Biiiliigif  Marine  ft 

Malacoldgie 

Centre  ile  Hiologie  Tropicale 

Ec'ole  Prali<ine  ties  liante.s  Etudes 

.\\emie  de  \'illeneu\e 

66860  Perpignan.  France 


R.  N.  Incani 

lJt'|)artanientii  de  I'arasitulcigia 
Facultad  de  Ciencias  de  la  Salud 
L'niversidad  de  C^araboho 
\'aleneia,  Venezuela 


(".  Balzan 

P.  Chrosoiechowski 

S.  Prypchan 

Division  de  Parasitosis  Intestinales  y 

Esquistosomiasis  Direccion  General 

Sectorial  de  Malariologia  y 

Saneamiento  Amhiental 

Ministerid  de  Sanidad  >  Asistencia 

Social 

Maracav,  Venezuela 


ABSTRACT 

Prior  to  1975,  some  streams  of  the  littoral  central  region  of 
Venezuela  were  active  transmission  sites  for  intestinal  schisto- 
somiasis. The  snail  intermediate  host,  BiomphuUnia  glabrata. 
was  controlled  but  not  eliminated  b)  repeated  molluscicide 
applications.  Two  thiarid  snails,  Thiara  granifera  and  Melan- 
oides tubereulata,  began  to  invade  these  streams  around  1975. 
The  rapid  expansion  of  these  two  species  was  confirmed  during 
more  recent  surveys.  Although  other  factors  max  be  involved, 
the  exi.stence  of  stable  populations  ot  tlie  two  thiarid  species  is 
probabK  linked  to  the  absence  of  recolonization  In  B.  glabrata. 
the  latter  species  has  not  been  observed  in  the  study  region 
during  the  last   15  \ears. 

Key  nords:  Schistosomiasis,  thiarid,  recolonization 


INTRODl'CTION 

The  littoral  central  region  of  N'enezuela  iornis  the  north- 
ern portion  of  an  endemic  area  for  intestinal  schistoso- 
miasis. Some  of  the  rivers  of  tins  region  have  previously 
offeree!,  and  may  still  constitute,  suitable  habitats  for  the 
snail  intermediate  host,  Biumphalaria  glabrata  (Say, 
1818);  they  may  thus  act  as  potential  transmission  sites 
for  tlie  parasite  (Incani,  1987).  \  control  program,  based 
cm  I  hemotherapy,  sanitation,  health  education,  environ- 
mental improvements  and  api)lications  of  molluscicides 
was  iiiitiatet!  in  194.).  'I'his  control  program  resulted  in 
the  near  total  inti'rruption  ot  transmission  of  Sehistosoma 
mansoni  (Sambon,  1907)  during  tfie  1970's  (Incani,  1987). 
Several  malacological  surveys  carried  out  in  the  lower 
course  of  the  rivers  before  1975  had  revealed  the  pres- 
ence of  R.  glalnata.  More  recent  surveys,  undertaken 
between  1975  and  1983,  and  in  1990.  demonstrated  the 


. '  \ 


10mm 


Kipurc  I.  Thiara  granijera  [\fil;  and  Melanoides  tubereulata 
Uight). 


J.  p.  Pointier  et  ai.,  1994 


Page  125 


Figure  2.  Map  of  the  littoral  ct-nlral  region  ol  \  ene/.uela  .showing  the  surveyed  rivers 


invasion  of  tliese  rivers  by  two  species  of  Thiaridae,  Thiara 
granifera  (Lamarck.  1822)  and  Mclanoidcs  tnlicrcnlata 
(Miiller,  1774)(Figs.  1,  2). 

Thiara  granifera  was  introduced  to  tlie  Caribbean 
area  around  1935  (Murray  &  Woopschal,  1965)  and  to 
\  enezuela  in  1970  (Chrosciechowski,  1973).  It  was  first 
observed  in  the  littoral  central  region  in  1975.  The  in- 
troduction of  M.  tubcrculata  to  the  Caribbean  area  prob- 
ably occurred  later.  It  was  reported  for  the  first  time  in 
Te.xas  in  1964,  but  according  to  Murrav  (1964),  it  prob- 
ably was  introduced  there  several  years  earlier.  M.  tub- 
crculata appeared  in  Venezuela  in  1972  (Chrosciechows- 
ki, 1973),  and  its  presence  in  the  rivers  of  the  littoral, 
central  region  coincided  with  that  of  T.  granifera.  This 
paper  presents  the  results  of  malacological  surveys  car- 
ried out  in  all  these  rivers  between  1975  and  1983,  and 
in  1990, 

METHODS 

Twent\-nine  rivers  were  sampled  along  the  littoral  cen- 
tral region  of  Venezuela  (Fig.  2).  All  are  permanent, 
short  and  rocky  streams  descending  rapidK'  from  the 
mountains  of  the  littoral  cordillera;  the  U[)[)er  stretches 
constitute  the  typical  habitat  of  the  local  thiarid  snail 
Pachycliilus  lacvississimu.s  (Sowerby,  1824).  The  lower 
courses,  often  polluted  in  urbanized  areas,  provide  suit- 


able habitats  for  the  snail  B  glahrata.  OnK  the  lower 
parts  of  the  rivers  were  investigated  during  this  study. 

Qualitative  data  were  collected  on  the  presence  or 
apparent  absence  of  the  main  species  of  snails  before 
1975,  between  1975  and  1983,  and  in  1990  during  the 
control  program  monitored  b\  the  Ministrv  of  Health 
(Chrosciechowski  ct  al..  1987;  Balzan,  1988).  Samplings 
using  a  quadrat  method  were  carried  out  in  si.x  sites 
located  on  the  lower  courses  of  the  Cata,  La  Trilla,  Ca- 
muri  Grande,  .Anare,  Los  Caracas  and  El  Botuco  Rivers 
in  1990.  A\\  snails  were  manually  collected  and  counted 
in  squares  of  0.1  m"  regularly  spaced  at  one  meter  in- 
tervals along  four  or  five  transects  crossing  the  river. 

RESULTS 

Prior  to  1975,  seven  of  these  rivers  harbored  B.  glahrata 
(Fig.  2  and  Table  1)  and  were  also  active  transmission 
sites  for  schistosomiasis.  These  rivers  were  treated  several 
times  with  molluscicides  (sodium  pentachlorophenate) 
during  the  19(50's  (.-Marcon  de  \o\a  ct  ai.  1987). 

In  1975,  T.  granifera  and  M.  tubcrculata  were  first 
discovered  in  the  Naiguata,  .Anare  and  Los  Caracas  Riv- 
ers, and  in  other  rivers  in  subsequent  years.  General 
survevs,  carried  out  between  1975  and  1983,  showed  that 
these  two  species  hail  become  dominant  in  many  rivers 
(Table  1).  In  1990,  another  survey  demonstrated  the  in- 


Page  126 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


Table  I.    Malai'ological  i)b.scT\ati(iii,s  made  in  t«ciit\  rivers  of  the  littoral  eeiilral  region  ol  \'eiie/iiela  B  g    Ruitttpluildrid  filahrala, 
I'.g.    Tliiara  graiiiffia.  Ml     Mclanoidcs  ttihcrciilata.  P.I.    Parhyeliilufi  Incvississimus. 


Snail  launa 


Rivers 


<  197,3 


1975-198;5 


1990 


MdlluscieRle 
application 

(last  \ear) 


Sanclioii 

Borlnirata 

I'atanenio 

San  Esteban 

l.a  Trilla 

Cat,. 

(iiiarapitii 

( lluironi 

( 'liuao 

El  Liinon 

Cliieliiriviche 

L'rieao 

Petaquire 

Osorio 

NEiciito 

San  Julian 

Lria 

N'aigiiata 

Caniuri  (irande 

.\iiart' 

Los  (Caracas 

El  Botuco 

La  Seea 

Osnia 

Oritapci 

Tixlasaiia 

La  Saljana 

Carnao 

( :liusp,i 


B.g. 


B.g. 

B.g. 
B.g. 

B.g. 

B.g. 
B.g. 


T.g./M.t.  (198.3) 
T.g./M.t.  (1980) 
T.g./M.t.  (1977) 
T.g./M.t.  (1977) 

r.g.  (198.3) 
T.g./M.t.  (1976) 

r.g.  (1984) 
T.g./M.t.  (1980) 
T.g./M.t 
T.g/M.t 
T.g/M.t 
T.g/M.t 

T.g.  (1979) 

T.g./M.t.  (1978) 

T.g./M.t.  (1979) 

T.g./M.t.  (1979) 

T.g/M.t.  (1979) 

T.g.  (1979) 

T.g.  (1979) 

T.g.  (1979) 


(1975) 
(1979) 
(197.5) 
(1975) 


T.g. 

M.t. 

T.g. 

T.g./M.t. 

T.g./M.t. /P.l. 

M.t. 

T.g. 

T.g. 

T.g. 
T.g./M.t 


P.l. 


T.g/M.t. 


T.g./M.t. 

T.g. 

T.g./M.t. 

T.g./ M.t. /P.l. 

T.g./M.t. 

T.g./M.t. 

T.g./M.t. 

T.g. 

T.g. 

T.g./M.t. 

T.g./M.t. 

1967 

1962 
19S4 

1962 

1963 

19(50 


vasion  of  most  of  the  rivers  of  this  region  by  the  two 
thiarids  and  confirmed  the  absence  of  B.  glahrota  (Table 
I). 

Sampling  carried  out  in  1990  by  the  ciuadrat  method 
determined  the  spatial  colonization  and  densities  of  snails 
in  these  six  rivers.  The  two  species  of  Thiaridae  mainly 
colonized  the  edges  or  protected  areas  in  five  of  the  six 
sites  (Figs.  .3-14).  These  sites,  with  one  exception,  were 
characterized  by  a  strong  current  throughout  the  year 
and  the  variable  presence  of  rocks,  stones,  grt  vel  and 
sand.  Snail  densities  were  not  uniform,  but  showed  an 
aggregated  distribution.  In  this  ecological  situation  T 
granifera  was  often  more  dense  than  M.  tuhcrcuhita. 
The  observed  maximum  densities  expressed  as  snails  per 
0  1  m-  were  of  .50  T.  granijcra  and  67  M.  tnherculata 
lor  ihcCata  River;  ,31  T.  grant j era  and  10  M.  tuhcrculata 
lor  the  La  Trilla  i^iver;  90  T.  granifera  and  1.5  M.  tuh- 
erculala  for  the  Camuri  (irande  River;  23  T.  granifera 
and  5  M.  tubereulata  for  the  Anare  River;  and  46  T. 
granifera  and  9  T.  tnherculala  for  the  Los  C-aracas  River 
(Figs.  3-14). 

The  sixth  site,  located  on  the  El  Botuco  River,  was 
ecologically  distinct  and  characterized  by  a  sandy  bottom 
and  very  low  velocities.  Snail  densities  were  low^  T.  gran- 
ifera reached  a  maximum  dcMsil\  of  10  in<li\iduals  per 


0.1  m-  and  occupied  mainK  the  center  of  the  river, 
w  hereas  M.  tuhcrculata  occurred  at  the  edges  at  densities 
as  high  as  9  individuals  per  0.1  m-  (Figs.  13-14). 

DISCIISSION 

Several  biological  control  i^rograms  using  M.  tuhcrculata 
as  a  competitor  ol  Bioniphalaria  .sp/J,  were  initiated  in 
the  Claribbean  area  (Prentice,  1983;  Pointier,  1989;  Point- 
ier ef  al..  1989).  In  four  field  trials  on  St.  Lucia,  B. 
glahrata  was  apparenth  eliminated  from  permanent 
marshes  and  streams,  6  to  22  months  after  the  introduc- 
tion ot  the  competitor  (Prentice,  1983).  In  Martinique, 
M.  tiiherciilata  was  introduced  to  groups  of  water-cress 
beds  and  eliminated  or  strongly  reduced  densities  of  the 
snail  hosts,  B.  glahrata  and  B.  straniinea.  in  less  than 
two  years  (Pointier  ct  al..  in  press).  In  Xenezuela,  the 
introduction  of  thiarid  snails  to  different  types  of  habitats 
in  the  Valencia  lake  region  (Fig.  2)  resulted  in  the  elim- 
ination of  Bioniphalaria  spp.  from  three  artificial  ponds. 
However,  results  witc  negative  in  several  streams  and 
rivers  (Pointier  et  al..  1991). 

The  rivers  of  the  littoral  central  region  are  verv  short 
and  rocky,  descending  rapidly  from  the  cordillera;  the 
water  Nclocities  ;ire  often  high.  The  thiarid  snails  mainly 


J.  p.  Pointier  et  al.,  1994 


Page  127 


Figures  3-8.  Snail  densities  per  0.1  in-  in  tlirei'  ri\ers  (it  tlie 
littoral  central  regiiin  (it  N'enezuela,  3.  C^ata  River,  Mclunuidcs 
ttiberculala  l.  Cata  Ri\er,  Thiarn  granijcra.  5.  La  Trilla  Ri\- 
er,  M.  tuherculata.  6.  La  Trilla  River,  T.  granijera.  7.  Canuni 
Grande  River,  M.  tubt'rculata.  8.  (,'aniuri  Grande  River,  T 
grain j era 


Figures  9-14.  Snail  densitit's  per  0  I  ni-  in  three  rivers  of  the 
littoral  central  region  of  Venezuela.  9.  Anare  River,  Melanoides 
tulicrculala.  10.  Anare  River,  Thiara  granijera.  l\.  Los  Ca- 
racas River,  M.  tuherculata.  12.  Los  Caracas  River,  T  gran- 
ijera L3.  El  Botuco  River,  M .  tuherculata.  14.  El  Botuco  River, 
T.  granijera. 


occupv  the  edges  and  other  protected  areas  (Figs.  3,  4). 
Rocks  and  stones  play  an  important  role  oBeriiig  nianv 
refuges  against  the  strong  current  ami  flooding.  The  riv- 
ers of  the  N'alencia  lake  basin  are  ecologically  different, 
with  substrates  mainly  of  gravel  and  sand.  Consequentlv , 
these  latter  rivers  offer  few  suitable  habitats  for  T  gran- 
ijera or  especially  for  M.  tuherculata  (Pointier  ct  al., 
1991).  The  importance  of  water  velocity  as  a  limiting 
factor  for  freshwater  puimonate  populations  has  been 
described  by  several  authors.  Scorza  et  al.,  (1961)  found 
a  negative  hnear  correlation  between  water  velocities 
and  densities  of  B.  glahrata  in  Venezuelan  streams.  In 
Puerto  Rico,  B.  glahrata  populations  did  not  survive  in 
portions  of  streams  steeper  than  20  meters  per  1000  me- 
ters of  length  (Harry  and  Cumbie,  1956).  Jobin  and  Ippen 
(1964)  investigated  the  behavior  of  B.  glahrata  in  irri- 
gation canals  and  found  that  snails  were  dislodged  when 
the  flow  rate  exceeded  65  cm/s.  More  recently,  Dussart 
(1987)  studied  the  effects  of  water  flow  on  the  detach- 
ment of  several  species  of  puimonate  snails  and  found 
significant  differences  between  species.  The  resistance  ol 
thiarid  snails  to  the  current  is  not  known,  l)ut  the  distri- 
bution patterns  of  the  different  species  in  the  rivers  of 
littoral  central  region  of  N'enezuela  indicate  that  T.  gran- 
ijera is  better  adapted  than  M.  tuherculata.  Experimen- 
tal studies  remain  to  be  undertaken. 


It  is  reasonably  well  established  that  T.  granijera  and 
M.  tuherculata  began  to  invade  the  rivers  of  this  region 
around  1975.  Before  1975  several  streams  were  active 
transmission  sites  for  schistosomiasis  and  repeated  mol- 
luscicide  applications  allowed  good  control  of  the  snail 
host.  However,  in  19.S0,  B.  glahrata  was  again  found  in 
the  San  Julian  River  and  was  responsible  for  the  reap- 
pearance of  an  important  focus  of  S.  mari.wni  (Alarcon 
de  Noya,  1987).  Several  molluscicide  treatments  between 
1980  and  1984  destroyed  the  B.  glahrata  colonies.  Some 
months  after  the  last  treatment,  an  important  coloniza- 
tion bv'  T.  granijera  was  noted.  During  the  following 
years,  dense  and  stable  populations  of  the  thiarid  snail 
were  established,  and  B.  glahrata  never  reappeared.  In 
Puerto-Rico,  a  study  of  the  distril^ution  of  freshwater 
snails  in  a  small  stream  showed  that  within  five  years, 
T.  granijera  had  displacetl  B.  glahrata  from  the  central 
portion  of  the  stream,  suggesting  some  form  of  compe- 
tition (Butlers  el  al.,  1980).  Therefore,  it  seems  probable 
that  the  colonization  of  the  San  Julian  River  by  dense 
populations  of  the  thiariil  snail  is  now  plaving  a  major 
role  in  preventing  the  reappearance  of  the  snail  hosts. 

The  colonization  of  the  rivers  by  the  two  species  of 
Thiaridae  appears  particularly  efficient.  When  the  cur- 
rent is  strong,  T.  granijera  outnumbers  M.  tuherculata, 
and  the  two  snails  are  confined  to  the  banks  of  the  streams 


Page  128 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


and  to  the  protected  areas.  VVlieii  the  current  is  weak, 
all  the  ri\er  bed  i.s  colonized,  l)ut  7".  granifera  occupies 
the  central  portion  of  the  habitat  while  M.  tuherculala 
occur.s  at  the  edges. 

The  last  nialacological  sur\e\,  carried  out  in  1990  in 
the  lower  course  of  t\\ent\  three  rivers  demonstrated  the 
total  dominance  of  the  two  thiarid  species.  However,  a 
few  .v.  punrtulata  and  /'.  lacvissis.sinuis  were  collected 
in  the  Oritapo,  (]amuri  Grande  and  Limon  Rivers.  The 
current  presence  of  stable  and  dense  populations  of  the 
two  thiarids  in  nearly  all  the  rivers  of  this  region  probabK 
constitutes  an  imijortaiit  deterrent  to  the  reappearance 
of  B.  glahrata,  although  other  factors  may  be  involved. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENT 

This  work  received  financial  sujiport  from  IINDP/World 
Bank,  WHO  Special  Progrannne  for  Research  and  Train- 
ing in  Tropical  Disease.  We  should  like  to  thank  Dr. 
Fergus  McCullough,  formerly  Senior  Scientist  ,  WHO, 
(ieneva.  for  his  critical  review  of  the  manuscript.  Vouch- 
er specimens  of  snails  are  deposited  at  the  Laboratoire 
de  Biologic  des  Invertebres  Marins,  Museum  National 
d'Histoire  Naturelle  de  Paris,  France. 


LITERATURE  CITED 

Alarcon  de  Nova,  B.,  O.  Nova,  l\   l  rluuv,  and  J   Hi.squez.    1987. 

Reactivacion  del  foco  l)i!liarziaiii)df  Caraballeda  en  1980- 

83.  Boletin  de  la  Direccion  ile  Malarioli)i;ia  \  Saiieamiento 

Ambiental  27(l-4):86-9:5 
15alzan,  C     1988.    Prograrna  cic  liiclia  contra  la  t-squi.stosomiasis 

eii  Wnezuela.  Ministerio  de  Sanidad  y  Asistencia  Social: 

l-ll 
Butler.  J    \I  ,  F.  F.  Ferguson.  J    \I    Palmer  and  W     H    Johm 

1980.    Displacement  of  a  colotu  ol  KuimphaUina  glahrata 

by  an  invading  population  of  Tarclna  granijcra  in  a  small 

stream  in  Puerto-Rico   Caribbean  journal  of  Science.  16 

(l-4):7.3-79. 
Chrosciechowski,  P.     1973.     In  caiacol  en  busca  dc  niii-\a 

re.sidencia.  El  Lago  30:813-814. 


( ibrosciecliouski.  P..  C.  Ralzan,  T.  Camejo  and  B  /Vlarcon  de 
Nova  1987  Recoleecion  de  caracoles,  estimacion  de  su 
poblacion  en  d  habitat  y  traslado  al  laboratorio  malacol- 
ogico.  In  Cesari,  N.  &  B.  .\larc-on  de  Noya  (eds.).  Es- 
ijuistiKumiasis  mansoni  diagnostic  y  control,  p.  84-86. 

lJu.ssart,(J.  B.J.  1987  Effects  of  water  How  on  the  detachment 
of  some  aquatic  pulmonate  gastropods  .American  Niala- 
cological Bulletin  5(  1  ,):6.'5-72. 

Harry,  II  W  and  B.  G.  Cmnbie  19.56  Stream  ijradicnl  as 
a  criterion  of  lotic  habitats  suitable  for  Auslralarhis  fila- 
hratiis  in  Puerto-Rico.  .American  Journal  ol  Tropital  Med- 
icine and  Hygiene  .5:921-928. 

Incani,  RN  1987  The  Venezuelan  experience  in  the  control 
of  Schistosoma  mansoni  Memorias  do  Iiistituto  Oswaldo 
Cruz  82(,supp  41:89-93. 

Jiibui.  W,  R,  anil  \  Ippen.  1964.  Ecological  design  ol  irri- 
jiation  channels.  Science  14.5:1324-1326. 

\1urra\,  II  I)  1964.  Tarchia  granijcra  dwA  Mclanindc\  tiih- 
crcnlata  in  Texas.  .American  Malacofuical  I  iiion  \rinnal 
Report  for  1964:  15-16.  [Abstract} 

\lurr.i\  11  I)  and  L.  J.  Woopschall  1965  Ecology  of  Me- 
lanoulcs  tuherculala  (Miiller)  and  Tarchia  granijera  in 
South  Texas.  American  Nialacological  Union  .Annual  Re- 
port for  1965:25-26.  [Abstract], 

I'onitier,  J.  P.  1989.  Comparison  between  tuci  biological  con- 
trol trials  of  Biomphalaria  glahrata  in  a  pond  in  (Guade- 
loupe, French  West  Indies  journal  ol  Medical  and  ,\pplietl 
Malacology  1:83-95. 

Poinlier.  J  P.,  A.  Giiyard,  and  A.  Mo.sscr.  1989.  Biological 
coiilml  (il  Biomphalaria  glalnata  and  B.  straminea  by  the 
competitor  snail  Thiara  tuhcrculata  in  a  transmission  site 
of  schistosomiasis  in  Martinique,  French  West  Indies.  .An- 
nals of  Tropical  Medicine  and  Parasitology,  83(31:263-269. 

Poinlier,  J  P.,  C  Balzan,  P.  C^hrosciechowski,  and  R  N  Incani. 
1991.  Limiting  factors  in  biological  control  ol  the  snail 
\ectorsof  scliistosomiasis  in  Wnezuela  Journal  of  Medical 
and  .Applied  Malacology  3:.53-67 

I'rentice,  M.  .A.  1983.  DisplncemenltA  Biomphalaria  glahrata 
by  the  snail  Thiara  granijera  in  field  habitats  in  St.  Lucia, 
West  Indies.  .Annals  of  Tropical  Medicine  and  Parasitology 
77:5 1 -.59. 

Scorza,  J.  \'.,  J.  Silva,  L.  Gonzalez,  and  R.  Machado.  1961. 
Stream  velocity  as  a  gradient  in  Aiislralorhis  glahratiis 
(Sav,  1818),  Zeitschrift  fiir  Tropical  Medi/in  uiid  Parasi- 
tologic 12:191-196. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(4):  129-135,  1994 


Page  129 


Corhicula  and  Neocorbiciila  (Bivalvia:  Corbiculidae)  in  the 
Parana,  Uruguay,  and  Rio  de  La  Plata  Basins 


Cristian  F.  Ituartp 

Musfii  lie  La  I'lala 

1900  La  Plata 

Buenos  Aires,  Argentina 


ABSTRACT 

CurlncuUl  Megerle,  1811  is  represented  ni  Arueiitniean  waters 
by  Corhicula  jlumuica  (Mliller.  1774)  and  C'lnhu  iila  Idri^illicrli 
(Pliiiippi,  1S44)  The  distrihution  (il  Corhicula  ui  the  l'aran,'i, 
L  rnuua\  atui  Hiii  lie  La  Plata  hasins  is  rexiewed  liaved  on 
inihlished  reports  and  eolleetions  at  the  Mnseo  de  La  Plata 
iMLP)  and  Museo  Argentino  de  t^iencias  Naturales  (M.A(A) 
Sinee  its  intrmluetion  about  two  deeades  ago,  Corhicula  has 
spread  rapidK  along  the  littoral  regions  of  the  Pio  tie  La  I'lata 
to  Punto  hullo  on  the  western  shore,  and  arroyo  tAifre  (.San 
Jose  n<'partTnent)  on  the  eastern  shore.  The  genus  has  reeentK 
been  reported  to  oeeur  in  the  Uruguay  River  from  Guale- 
gna\ehn  to  Pio  de  La  Plata  .Additional  reeords  from  the  Parana 
Piver  at  Paso  de  La  Patria,  Isia  Barran(|uera  and  Bella  Vista 
are  re|iorted  In  onler  to  elarif)  the  status  and  taxononn  of  the 
eorbieulids  of  the  area,  a  brief  eomparative  analysis  ol  the 
morpholog\  of  C'orhiiula  and  Scocorlniiila  hischer,  1JS.S7,  is 
pro\  ided 

Key  i((;r(/\,  Curhu  ula.  Scocorhicula.  .\rgentina,  (hslnbulmn, 
introduced  species 


INTRODICTION 

The  family  ('orliieuiidae  is  represented  in  the  sciiitliern 
neotropical  region  b\  the  native  genus  Ncocorhiciila  Fi- 
scher, 1887,  species  of  which  were  formerly  attrihnted 
to  Corhicula  Megerle,  1811  (e.g.  Prime,  1865;  Marshall, 
1924,  1927).  Parodiz  and  Hennings  (1965)  elevated  the 
rank  and  clarified  the  taxonomy  of  the  genus  Neocor- 
bicula,  earlier  proposed  as  a  section  or  subgenus  of  Cor- 
hicula, and  stated  that  South  American  taxa  are  referable 
to  Neocorhicula. 

Species  of  the  genus  Corhicula  ma\  have  been  intro- 
duced into  the  Rio  de  La  Plata  basin  l)etv\een  1965  and 
1975.  Specimens  belonging  to  this  genus  were  first  col- 
lected from  the  sandy  banks  at  Punta  Lara  in  February 
1979  (Ituarte,  1981).  In  June  1978,  Corhicula  was  col- 
lected from  the  Jacui  and  Guaiba  basins  (Rio  Grande  do 
Sul,  Brazil),  with  the  species  identified  by  N'eitenheimer- 
Mendes  (1981)  as  Corhicula  inanilcnsis  (Philippi,  1844). 
According  to  Morton  (1979),  tfiis  species  is  a  synonym 
of  C.  fluminca  (Miiller,  1774).   Ituarte  (1982)  first  re- 


ported C.  largillicrti  (Philippi,  1844)  at  Colonia  (Uru- 
guay), on  the  eastern  shore  of  the  Rio  de  La  Plata. 

N'eitenheitner-Meiules  and  Olazarri  (1983)  provided 
additional  records  along  the  L  ruguay  River  from  Las 
Canas  (south  of  Fray  Bentos)  to  Pimta  Gorda  (Depart- 
ment of  Colonia)  and  from  the  eastern  shore  of  the  Rio 
de  La  Plata  to  .\rroyo  Cufre  (Department  of  San  Jose), 
extending  the  known  range  of  the  genus.  However,  the 
specimens  collectetl  in  their  sur\ey  were  not  identified 
precisely. 

Ituarte  (1984a)  reported  some  biological  aspects  of  a 
population  of  C.  largillicrti  at  Pinita  Lara,  Rio  de  La 
Plata.  Ituarte  (1985)  described  the  growth  d\iiamics  in 
a  natural  population  of  C.  fluminca  at  Pimta  Atalaya, 
Rio  de  La  Plata,  extending  its  known  range  along  the 
western  shore  of  the  estuary .  In  a  brief  communication, 
Olazarri  (1986)  suggested  the  presence  of  two  Asiatic 
species  of  Corhicula .  C.  largillicrti  antl  C.  fluminca.  in 
the  L'ruguay  Basin. 

In  the  present  paper,  further  data  concerning  the  mor- 
phological characterization  ol  the  genera  Corhicula  and 
\cocorhicula  are  proxided.  The  range  of  Corhicula  spe- 
cies in  Argentina  has  been  extended  to  the  Parana  River, 
and  the  species  inhabiting  the  Uruguay  River  are  iden- 
tified. The  distribution  of  the  genus  Corhicula  along  the 
Rio  de  La  Plata  is  reviewed  and  variation  in  shell  shape 
due  to  environmental  factors  is  discussed.  N'oucher  spec- 
imens from  this  study  are  deposited  in  the  invertebrate 
collections  of  the  Museo  de  La  Plata  and  Museo  Argen- 
tino de  Ciencias  Naturales. 


RESULTS 

The  .Asiatic  Clam  genus  Corhicula  is  represented  in  Ar- 
gentinean and  L  ruguayan  waters  by  two  species,  C.  flu- 
minca and  C.  largillicrti.  Present  distribution  of  the 
genus  in  the  Rio  de  La  Plata  estuary  (fig.  4)  spans  the 
entire  w  estern  shore  from  the  delta  of  the  Parana  River 
to  Magdalena  Cit\'  (35°02'S,  58°28'\V)  stretching  ap- 
proximately 75  km  along  the  sandy  intertidal  zone.  Bot- 
tom deposits  are  composed  of  fine  sands  and  Parana  River 
sediments.  Beyond  Magdalena  City,  only  isolated  indi- 


Page  130 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


I'if^iiri's  !-.'{.  Scoii/rlni  iild  liiiKisii  I.  I'loiital  scclioii  .shovviiij; 
spatial  segregation  ot  male  (ventral)  and  female  (dorsal)  tissues 
within  the  visceral  mass.  2.  Sagital  section  oi  the  inner  demi- 
branch  showing  embryos  brooded  within  the  water  tubes  Co- 
horts of  different  ages  are  visible  .'5.  Detail  ol  ligure  2,  showing 
the  advaneeil  stage  ol  development  ot  embryos.  .All  scale  bars 
=  0.5  mm 


viduals  of  Corlncula  were  found.  Darrigraii  (personal 
comrminication)  collected  both  (.'.  fluminca  and  C.  lar- 
gillierti  at  Piinta  Indio. 

The  dislrihiition  of  Curhicula  along  the  eastern  shore 
of  the  Rio  lie  la  Plata  estuary  is  diseontiiiiious.  \eiteii- 
heimer  and  Olazarri  (1983)  had  reported  several  records 
of  Corlncula  at  San  Jose  and  Colonia  Departments  with- 
out iilentilieation  to  species.  The  only  fully  identified 
record  of  L'ruguayan  Corlncula  in  the  Witt  ile  la  Plata 
River  is  a  single  lot  of  C.  largillicrti  from  Ciolonia  (MACN 
30175)  identified  by  Ituarte  (1982).  Along  the  southern 
[jortions  of  the  Rio  de  la  Plata  estuar\,  Curhicula  pop- 
ulations seem  to  have  been  limited  by  substratum  char- 
acteristics (increased  clay  content)  and  a  progressive  in- 
crease in  salinity  caused  by  inflow  of  sea  water  during 
maximum  high  tides. 

Three  new  records  for  both  C.  fluminca  and  C.  lar- 
gillicrti from  the  upper  course  of  the  Parana  River  are: 
Paso  de  La  Patria,  Isla  Barranquera  and  Bella  Vista 
(Province  of  Corrientes).  Only  C.  fluminca  was  collected 
at  San  Nicolas,  on  the  lower  course  of  the  Parana  River 
(Ituarte,  1982). 

The  Parana  River  flow  s  into  the  Rio  de  La  I^lata  estuary 
through  a  wide  delta  system,  where  both  C.  fluminea 
and  C.  largillicrti  have  been  collected  The  former  spe- 
cies seems  to  be  more  abimdaiit  in  the  Sarmiento  River, 
the  mouth  of  the  Lujan  River,  and  the  .\rro\  <i  Abra  \ieja. 

The  genus  Corhicula  is  present  in  the  Uruguay  River 
from  Nueva  Palmira  to  Fray  Bentos.  Both  C.  fluminea 
and  C.  largillicrti  were  found  in  nearly  all  of  the  41 
samples  taken  in  12  transects  of  the  river  in  this  area. 
N'eitenheimer-Mendesand  Olazarri  (1983)  reported  Cor- 
lncula from  the  following  localities  along  the  Uruguayan 
coast  without  identifying  the  species:  Department  of  Co- 
lonia -  Punta  Gorda,  Nueva  Palmira;  Department  of 
Soriano  -  Agraciada,  CA)ncordia,  Rio  San  Sakailor,  Do- 
lores; Department  of  Rio  Negro  -  Las  Canfias  Rivulet 
(southward  to  Fray  Bentos).  Of  the  many  watercourses 
that  flow  into  the  Uruguay  River  from  the  Argentine 
shore,  C  largillicrti  was  found  in  oiiK  one,  the  Parana- 
cito  Rivulet,  This  species  was  also  collectetl  at  Santo  Tome 
(C^orrientes),  the  northernmost  record  Irom  the  Uruguay 
River. 

Shell  shape  and  especially  shell  outline  are  aftected  by 
such  environmental  factors  as  substrate  composition,  hy- 
drodynamic  forces,  and  other  hydrological  characteris- 
tics, inchKling  tidal  regime.  A  typical  trigonal  shell  out- 
line, inllateil  beaks  and  unerodetl  umbos  (extended  into 
a  rostrum  posteriorly)  are  characteristic  ol  individuals  of 


bl,  br.uicliial  filament;  bp.  w  ater  tube  expanded  In  Inrni  a  brood 
pouch,  e,  embrso;  9,  female  tissues,  6,  male  tissues,  I,  inti'stine. 
id,  inner  demibrancli,  i]  inlerlamellar  junction,  nic,  mucous 
cells;  1,  iccliim,  S,  sloin.uli,  wl    walei   lube 


C.  F.  Ituarte,  1994 


Page  131 


-30- 


San 


BUENOS 


-35 


Dib.  C.R.Tremouilles 


Figure  4.     Distriliiitioii  of  Corbicula  species  in  the  sniitliern  Neotropical  region,  including  new  localities  for  C  fluniinea  and  C. 
lareillivrti.  See  text  lor  details. 


C.  fluminca  that  inhabit  lentic  and  permanent  en\  iron- 
ments  with  a  soft  substratum  composed  of  mud  or  silt 
with  \ariable  sand  content.  Habitats  composed  of  sand 
bottoms,  with  flow  iiig  water  and  or  that  are  tidali)  af- 
fected contain  specimens  with  a  rounded  or  oval  shell 
outline,  and  consequently  higher  Length/height  (L/H) 
and  length/width  (L/W)  ratios. 

E.xamples  of  tiie  effects  of  environmental  factors  on 


shell  morphology  can  be  found  in  the  Rio  de  La  Plata 
at  Olivos.  Large  populations  of  both  C.  largillierti  and 
C.  fluminca  were  present  along  the  extended  sand  flat 
in  the  intertidal  portion  of  the  estuary.  Hydrological 
conditions  are  strongly  affected  by  the  reduced  slope  in 
the  intertidal.  Tidal  flows  and  waves  increased  in  some 
cases  by  southeastern  winds  produced  shells  with  oval 
outlines,  eroded  umbos  and  high  values  of  L/H  and  L/ 


Page  132 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


4> 

^ 

O 

a^' 

4fly  4^ 

^^ 


8 


4r 

■\ 

# 


■;«■ 


## 


Fij»ure>  }{-•>.  Si-rii".  nl  spriiiiifiis  taken  lidin  Iklal  pdiuls  (left) 
and  MiiKU  inlertiflal  (rii;iit)  luihilats  in  ()li\().s,  Huenoi  .Aires, 
Rio  de  La  Plata  8.  Citrhicula  largillicrli.  ').  Corhicula  flumi- 
iicd     \ll  scilc  liais  =    Ml  Tnni 


l-'if;urc>  .'>-7.  ( ^>rl)itiiiiils  liiini  Hid  ilc  La  I'lata.  .S.  Scacor- 
Inciila  hmosa  (Matoii,  1809)  froni  llir  aiT(i\o  Migiielin  6.  Ci>r- 
hiciila  /(n7;i7/uTh' (Pliilippi.  ISlli  ironi  Piinta  lara.  Kii.scnada. 
7.  Corhicula  fhimincii  (Miillcr.  177 1),  Ironi  Olivos,  I?iieiio.s 
Aires    ,\ll  scale  hars  =   10  mm. 


C.  F.  Ituarte,  1994 


Page  133 


'I'ahl.-  I.    Slirll  IfTijitli   slic-ll  lifiiihl  (LH)  ami  slicll  lciii;lli   shell  ukUIi  (L   W  I  rutins  lor  (,'.  larnillurti  and  ('  jhinuma  pcipulatioiis 
licirii  ililltTfiil  fiivlroiimfnls  at  ()li\i)s.  Win  dr  I, a  I'lata    (.v  =  nu-aii.  S  =  staiidanl  iIcn  iaticjii  ) 

(.'.  ftuiuinca 


C 

.  Iargilli( 

■rli 

1.  H                             1.  w 

n 

A 

S 

X                 S 

101 
101 

1  1:5 
1  20 

0  02 
oot 

1  5h            0  05 

1  iiT            0  07 

II 


L/W 


Sdit  Ixittcmis 
SaiicK   intcrtiilal 


1   17 
I  20 


0  04 

0  0.) 


I  SS 


0  05 
0  10 


W  (figs.  8,9;  Table  1 ).  Populations  that  srttleii  in  substrate 
depressions  along  the  upper  intertidal  zone,  vvhieh,  like 
tide  pools  of  the  rocky  marine  intertidal  areas,  constitute 
small,  lentic,  micro-habitats  with  sand  bottoms  contain- 
ing substantial  amounts  of  mud  or  silt,  luue  a  typical 
trigonal  shell  outline,  inflated  beaks,  thick  shells,  ami 
lower  L/W  and  L/H  ratios.  The  posterior  projection  ot 
the  rostrum  occurs  only  in  Corhicula  fliimiriea  (Figs.  S,9; 
Table  1). 

DISCUSSION 

Parodiz  and  Hennings  (1965)  reported  that  the  family 
Corbiculidae  is  represented  in  the  southern  neotropical 
region  b\  the  native  genus  Neocorhictila  Fisher,  1887 
In  Argentina,  Mcocorbicula  liinu^a  {Maton,  1809)  is  found 
along  the  Llruguay  and  the  Rio  de  La  Plata  Rivers,  while 
N.  parancnsis  (d'Orbigny,  1846)  occurs  in  the  Parana 
River  Basin.  Although  a  considerable  bod\  of  evidence 
has  been  presented  to  warrant  the  segregation  ol  South 
American  forms  within  the  genus  Ncocurhicula  (Parodiz 
&  Hennings,  1965;  Dall,  1902;  Ituarte,  1984a,  b,  1986) 
many  authors  persist  in  referring  autochtonous  taxa  to 
the  genus  Corhicula.  Conclusions  based  on  this  premise, 
including  biogeographic  (Counts,  1980;  McMahon,  1983) 
and  shell  morphometric  comparisons  (Britton  6;  Morton, 
1979)  are  erroneous. 

Corhicula  and  Neocorbicula  differ  substantially  in  shell 
morphologv.  The  wide  range  of  shell  \ariability  show  n 
by  both  genera  in  response  to  environmental  factors  re- 
veals that  the  most  relevant  character  is  the  presence  in 
Neocorhicula  of  a  deepK  marked  pallial  sinus  (siphon 
lengths  12-14  mm).  In  Corhicula  the  pallial  sinus  is  ab- 
sent or  represented  by  a  slightK  curved  pallial  line,  and 
siphons  as  well  as  associated  retractor  muscles  are  scarce- 
ly developed  (  siphon  lengths  3-4  mm)  (figs,  5-7). 

Branchial  incubation  of  embryos,  a  characteristic  com- 
mon to  both  genera,  is  carried  out  in  different  ways. 
Corhicula  incubate  embry  os  in  large  rnnnbers  [  >  10,000, 
as  calculated  for  C.  largillierti  (Ituarte,  1984a)]  within 
the  water  tubes  of  the  tw  o  inner  demibranchs.  The  basic 
structure  of  the  inner  demibranchs  of  Corhicula  is  un- 
modihetl,  and  differs  from  the  outer  demibranchs  only 
in  ha\ing  fewer  interlamellar  junctions.  Seocorhicula. 
on  the  other  hand,  develops  brood  pouches  by  cellular 
proliferation  of  the  interlamellar  junction  epithelium  of 
the  inner  demibranchs.  Each  brood  pouch  contains  a 
single  embryo.   Gravid  indi\iduals  usually  have  20-30 


brood  pouches,  and  occasionalK  as  many  as  45  (Ituarte. 
1984b)  figs.  2,3).  The  incubation  period  of  Corhicula  is 
\er\  short,  with  embryos  released  at  a  late  veliger  or 
pediveliger  stage  (200-240 /um  diameter)  (Ituarte,  1984a; 
Britton  &  Morton,  1979).  In  Ncororin'riWa,  the  incubation 
period  is  longer  and  the  offspring  are  released  as  fully 
developed  juveniles  Birth  size  in  Mcocorhicula  is  about 
1.1  mm.  Howe\er,  some  indi\iduals  from  each  cohort 
remain  in  the  maternal  gill  until  the\  reach  4-5  mm  in 
shell  length  (Ituarte,  1984a)  (figs.  2,3).  In  Corhicula.  all 
embry  OS  w  ithin  a  gra\  id  indi\itlual  show  a  similar  degree 
of  ile\  elopment,  while  in  Scocorhicula  tw  o  or  three  gen- 
erations of  larvae  may  coexist  w  ithin  each  demibranch 
(Ituarte,  1984b)  (fig.  2). 

Those  species  of  both  genera  that  occur  in  the  Amer- 
icas are  simultaneous  hermaphrodites.  However,  there 
are  differences  in  gonadal  structure.  During  the  early 
stages  of  gonadal  development  of  Neocorhicula  the  pre- 
dominant elements  in  the  acinar  wall  are  large  and  vac- 
uolated follicular  cells,  w  ith  germ  cells  scattered  along 
the  base  of  the  epithelimn  (Ituarte,  1986).  In  Corhicula. 
follicles  are  composed  of  minute  follicular  cells,  with 
gonia  the  dominant  elements  in  the  acinar  wall  (Ituarte, 
1984a).  In  Corhicula  there  is  no  pronounced  segregation 
of  male  and  female  germinal  cells  within  the  gonad.  If 
any  degree  of  localization  exists  (Kraemer,  1978),  it  dif- 
fers from  that  shown  in  Neocorhicula,  where  the  ovary 
occupies  the  dorsal  region  of  the  gonad,  while  the  testes 
develop  in  the  ventral  half  (Ituarte,  1986)  (fig.  1).  Fur- 
thermore, in  Neocorhicula.  testes  occupy  more  than  50'x' 
of  the  gonad  (Ituarte,  1986)  while  in  Corhicula.  they 
occupy  15-30%  (Kraemer  &  Lot,  1977;  Britton  &  Morton, 
1979).' 

Corhicula  largillierti  was  tiescribed  from  the  Yangtse- 
Kiang  River  in  China,  and  its  range  includes  northern 
and  Central  China  as  well  as  the  Korean  Peninsula  (Pras- 
had,  1929).  The  taxonomy  of  the  Asiatic  species  of  Cor- 
hicula was  reviewed  by  Morton  (1979),  who  reanalysed 
Prashad's  (1929)  "affinities  '  and  regarded  C  largillierti 
as  belonging  to  a  group  of  species  that  are  synonymous 
with  C.  fluminea  (Morton,  1979:  Table  11).  However,  a 
re-examination  of  plots  of  affinities  of  Chinese,  Korean 
and  southeastern  Russian  species  reveals  C.  largillierti  to 
be  distinct  from  an\  other  species  (Morton,  1979:  Table 
6).  Moreover,  there  is  no  evidence  in  the  text  of  Prashad 
(1929)  to  support  the  s\iion\m\  of  C  largillierti  with 
C.  fluminea. 

The  material  studied  and  assigned  to  C.  largillierti. 


Page  134 


THE  NAUTILUS,  Vol.  107,  No.  4 


which  i.s  now  widoK  (listril)utecl  in  Argentinean  waters, 
show.s  morpliological  ditierenee.s  from  C.  jluminea  that 
are  sufficient  to  to  consider  it  a  distinct  species.  Corbicula 
largillierti  is  characterizetl  In  its  inoch'rateiN  thick  shell, 
with  fine,  clo.seK  spaced  concentric  ridges  and  \ellowish 
or  greenish  surface.  Its  shell  is  trigonal,  nearly  equilateral, 
and  not  greatly  inflated  Its  beaks  are  moderately  inflated, 
the  posterior  end  slightK  [irotrucled  and  obtuse  at  the 
c\tremit\,  e\en  in  larger  indisiduals  (fig.  6)  Corbicula 
fluniinca  differs  from  C.  lar^illicrti  in  having  a  more 
solid  shell,  with  coarser,  more  widely  spaced  surface  sul- 
cations.  Its  shell  is  more  inflated  and  globous,  with  prom- 
inent and  inflated  Ix-aks  In  C.  fluminea.  the  posterior 
margin  is  markedlv'  protruded  to  form  a  characteristic 
rostrum,  especially  in  specimens  larger  than  15  mm  (fig. 

7). 

In  spite  of  the  liighly  variable  shell  morphology  that 
results  from  environmental  factors,  the  differentiating 
features  listed  above  do  not  become  masked,  and  the  two 
species  are  easily  distinguished  even  when  populations 
of  both  species  coexist  in  the  same  habitat. 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 

The  author  wishes  to  express  his  gratitude  to  Dr.  Tad- 
ashige  Habe  (National  Science  Museum,  Tokyo)  for  his 
assistance  in  the  identification  of  specimens  of  Corbicula 
largillierti.  Thanks  are  also  due  to  the  following  for  pro- 
\  iding  specimens:  Dr.  F.  Spinach  Ross  (Proyecto  Eval- 
uacion  de  Recursos  Pesqueros  del  Rio  Uruguay,  CARU- 
INIDEP-INAPE);  Mr.  R.  Dillon,  Mrs.  A.  Ibargoyen,  Dr. 
J.  Garcia,  Lie.  F.  Kaisin,  Lie.  N.  Laiidoni,  and  Dr.  A. 
Rumi. 

LITERATURE  CITED 

linttmi,  J.  C  ,  D.  R.  Coldiron,  L.  P.  Evans,  Jr.  C.  GolightK,  K 
U.  O'Kane,  and  J.  R.  Teneyck.  1979.  Reevaluatioii  of 
the  growth  pattern  in  Corbicula  fluminea  (Miiller).  [in]: 
Brittoii,  J.  C.  (ed.)  Proceedings,  First  International  Cor- 
bicula Symposium.  Texas  Cliristiaii  L'niversity  Research 
F"oundation,  Fort  Wortii,  Texas,  p.  15-3><. 

Brittoii,  J.  C.  and  B.  S.  Morton.  1979.  Corbicula  in  Nortii 
America:  The  evidence  revievvwl  and  evaluated  [in]:  Brit- 
ton,  J.  C.  (ed.)  Proceedings,  First  liUeriiational  Oirbicuia 
Symposium.  Texas  Christian  University  Researcli  Foun- 
dation, Fort  Worth,  Texas,  p.  2-19-287 

Britton,  J.  C.  and  B.  S.  Morton.  I9S6  Fob  inorpiiism  in  Cor- 
bicula  fluminea  (Bivalvia:  Corbiculoiilea)  from  Ncirtii 
.Vmerica   Maiacologieal  Beviev\   19:l-4'5 

Counts,  C  \.  1980.  The  •^vwn^  (.'■orbicula  Mulilteld  (Bivalvia: 
Corbiciilidae)  in  .Africa  and  South  America:  Zoogeograpli- 
ic  and  taxonomic  prol)lems.  Bulleliii  nl  llic  Xnicncaii  \lal- 
acological  Union  for  1980:71-72 

Dall.  W.  H.  1902.  Noteon.\Vo™r/«ci//</ ImmIici-  TIh' Nautilus 
16:82-83. 

Hayashi,  Y.  1956.  On  the  variation  ol  C.iirlii(  iiln  dui-  t<i  en- 
vironmental factors.  Venus  l9(l):54-60. 

Ingram,  VV  M  1918.  The  larger  fresh  water  cl.iins  ot  Cali- 
fornia, Oregon  and  Washington  Journal  ol  I'ulouiology 
and  Zoology  40(-l):72-92. 


Iluarte,  C.  F.  1981  Primera  noticia  acerca  de  la  iiitroduccion 
de  pelecipodos  asiaticos  en  el  area  rioplateusc  NCotropica 
27:79-82. 

Ituarte,  (;.  F.  1982.  C^oulribuciou  al  conocnniculo  dc  la  bio- 
logia  de  la  tamilia  Corbiculidae  (Mollusca  Pelecypoda)  en 
el  Kio  de  La  Plata.  Doctoral  Tlu-sis  No  408  Facultad  de 
(aeiicias  Naturales  v  Museo.  I  iiiversidad  Naeional  de  La 
Plata. 

Ituarte,  C".  F.  1984a.  .Aspectos  bioioijico.s  dc  las  poblaciones 
de  Corbicula  largillierti  iPliilippi.  1844)  (Mollusca  Pele- 
cypoda) en  el  Kio  dc  La  Plata  Revista  del  Museo  de  La 
Plata  (nueva  serie)  13(1 431:231-247. 

Ituarte,  i'.  F.  1984b.  El  fen(Smeno  de  Ineubacion  branquial 
en  Neocorbicula  limosa  (Maton,  1809)  (Mollusca  Pelecy- 
poda). Neotropica  30(83):43-54. 

Ituarte,  C.  F,  198.5.  Growth  dynamics  in  a  natural  i)opulatioii 
ol  Corbicula  fluminea  (Bisaivia  Spliacriacea)  at  I'unta 
Atalaya,  Bio  de  La  Plata,  .\rgeutina.  Studies  on  Neotrop- 
ical Fauna  and  Environment  20(41:217-22.5. 

Ituarte,  C.  F.  1986.  Contribucion  al  conocimicMlo  dc  la  Inol- 
ogia  reproducliva  de  Scocorbicula  limosa  (Maton,  1809) 
(Mollusca  Pelecypoda).  .\nales  de  la  Sociedad  Caentifica 
Argentina  214,  I  No.  47:1-27. 

Kraemer,  L  1978.  Corbicula  fluminea  (Bi\aKia:  Sphaeri- 
acea):  The  functional  morphology  of  its  hermaphroditism. 
Rullclin  ol  die  .\merican  Malacoloi;Jcal  I  niou.  197S40- 
49 

Kraemer,  L.  and  S.  Lott.  1977.  Microscopic  anatomy  of  the 
\  isceral  mass  of  Corbicula  (Bivab  ia:  Sphaeriacea).  Bulletin 
ol  the  .American  Malacological  L  niou.  197748-55. 

Marshall,  W  B  1924.  New  Uruguayan  Mollusks  of  the  genus 
Corhictilii  Proceedings  of  the  L'uited  States  National  Mu- 
seum ()(n2552):l-14. 

Marshall,  W.  B.  1927.  New  species  of  mollusks  ol  the  gciuis 
Corbicula  from  Uruguay  and  Brazil.  Proceedings  ol  the 
United  States  National  Museum  72(2699):l-7 

McMahou,  R  F.  1983.  Ecology  of  an  invasive  pest  bi\al\e, 
Corbicula  In:  K.  M.  Wilbur  (ed  1  The  Mollusca.  .\cademic 
Press,  New  York,  6:463-561. 

Morion,  n  S  1979.  Corbicula  in  Asia.  In:  Brillon,  J.  C.  (ed.) 
Proceedings,  Urst  International  Corbicula  Symposium. 
Texas  Christian  University  Research  Foundation.  Fort 
Worth,  Texas,  p.  15-38. 

Ola/arrl,  J  1986.  Las  alinejas  del  genero  Corbicula  en  el  rio 
Lruguay  Hesinnenes  de  Comunicaciones,  Seminario  "El 
rio  Orugnay  y  sus  Recursos"  CAKl  -INAPF-INIDFP,  Entre 
Bios,  Argentina. 

Parodiz,  J.  J.  and  L.  Henniiigs.  1965  The  Scocorhicula  (Mol- 
lusca Pelecypoda)  of  the  Parana-L  ruguay  basin.  South 
America.  Annals  of  the  Carnegie  Museum  38(3):69-96. 

Prashad,  B.  1929.  Revision  of  the  .Asiatic  species  of  the  genus 
Corbicula  III  The  species  of  the  genus  Corlncula  from 
China.  Tibet,  Formosa  and  Philippine  Islands  Memoirs, 
Indian  Museum  949-68 

Prime,  T.  18()5,  Monograph  of  .\meriiau  Corbiculidae  (Re- 
cent and  fossil).  Smithsonian  Miscellaneous  ( iolleclious  71- 
80 

SukI.ui,  H  M  .nul  B  (;.  Isom.  1963.  Further  studies  on  the 
mtroihmd  .\siatic  clam  Corbicula  in  Tennessee.  Tennes- 
.see  Stream  Pollution  Control  Board.  Tennessee  Depart- 
ment of  Pulilii-  Health,  N'aslnillc.  Tennessee,  76  p. 

Smith,  M  11  .  J  C  Button.  P  Buike,  K  K  Chesser,  M.  W. 
Suulh,  ,iuil  J  ll.ii;cn.  1979.  Cenetic  variability  in  Cor- 
buiila.  ail  iiiv.iding  species.  In:  Britton,  J.  C.  (ed.)  Pro- 


C.  F.  Ituarte,  1994 


Page  135 


ceedings.  First  Interiialiniial  Cdrlncula  S\  nipusium.  Texas 
Christian  L'iiiversit\  Research  Founilatioii.  Kurt  Wnrlh, 
Texas,  p.  243-248 
N'eilenlieimer-Mendes,  I  L.  1981-  C'orhicula  inanili'u.'iis  [Fhi- 
Hppi,  1844),  mohisco  asiatico,  ria  liacia  do  Jaeui  e  do  Guai- 
ba,  Rio  Grande  do  Sul,  Brasil  iBi\al\ia  Gorbieuhdae). 
Iheringia  (Zoologia)  60:63-74. 


\  ciU-nlieimer-Meiides,  I  F  anil  J  Olazarri.  1983.  Primeros 
registros  de  Curhicula  Megerle,  1811  (Bivalvia  Corbicu- 
hdae)  para  el  rio  Iriiguav  .  Boletiii  de  la  Sociedad  Zoologica 
ilel  L  rugua\   1  50-53. 


THE  NAUTILUS  107(4):136,  1994 


Page  136 


Sea  Slugs  and  their  Relatives  of  Western  Australia 


by  Fred  E.  Wells  and  (Clayton  \V.  Bryce.  1993.  West- 
ern Australian  Museum,  Perth,  viii  +  184  pp.,  227  figs., 
1  map.  Softcover,  $30.00  U.S.  ISBN  0-7309-5523-0. 

The  opisthobranch  gastropods  or  "sea  slugs"  of  Western 
.Australia  have  been  gloriousK  introduced  in  this  new- 
book,  a  well-matched  companion  volume  to  Seashells  of 
Western  Australia  by  the  same  authors  (Western  Aus- 
tralian Museum,  1986)  which  treated  only  16  species  of 
opisthobranchs.  Produced  in  virtually  the  same  size  and 
organization  as  the  Seashells  volume,  it  is  also  based  on 
the  collections  and  research  activities  ot  the  Western 
Australian  Museum  in  Perth,  undoubtedly  including  the 
results  of  a  series  of  international  workshops,  the  last  held 
in  .Albain  in  1988.  The  authors  extend  this  work  as  a 
sample  rather  than  a  complete  coverage  of  this  diverse 
fauna,  but  its  a  substantial  snack,  at  any  rate,  of  224 
species  in  42  families  and  6  orders  (Cephalaspidea,  The- 
cosomata,  .Anaspidea,  Notaspidea,  Sacoglossa,  and  147 
species  of  Nudibranchia).  .\11  but  a  tew  are  beautifulK 
illustrated  as  living,  craw  ling  creatures  in  full  (sometimes 
gaudy)  color;  only  a  few  bubbles  and  pteropods  are  pre- 
sented as  empty  shells. 

Each  higher  ta.xon  is  briefly  diagnosed  and  most  are 
accompanied  by  a  useful  list  of  references  from  the  pri- 
mary literature  (all  but  a  few  from  the  1960's  or  later). 
Species  descriptions  include  size,  rarity,  common  syn- 
onyms, and  overall  geographical  range  plus  specific  oc- 
currences in  Western  Australia.  Again  matching  theSca- 
shells  \ olume,  the  geographical  scope  of  this  book  includes 
the  entire  coastline  of  the  state  of  Western  .-Australia, 
from  the  tropical  Kimberly  region  to  the  temperate  Re- 
cherche .\rcliipelago.  The  authors  planned  to  (and  in 
fact  do)  include  representatives  of  each  of  the  si.x  orders 
from  each  of  the  three  major  zoogeographical  regions, 
w  ith  over  40  cited  localities.  Added  to  this  volume  are 
records  from  late-1980's  collecting  on  Christmas  Island 
and  the  Cocos  (Keeling)  Islands,  Australian  Territories 
in  the  Indian  Ocean.  Although  rather  out-of-place,  these 
18  species  records  (7  of  which  are  not  found  in  Western 
•Xustralia)  do  not  seriously  detract  from  the  unity  of  this 
\()lunie.  Nevertheless,  they  might  ha\('  been  more  ef- 
fecliveK  presented  as  a  separate  primar>  publication. 

Both  the  pages  preceding  and  following  the  main  tax- 
onomic  .section  reflect  tho.se  presented  by  the  Seashells 
volume,  with  appropriate  motlifications  and  uptlated  in- 
formation. The  introduction  covers  various  aspects  of 


opisthobranch  biology  (behavior,  feeding,  life  histories), 
and  the  chapter  on  zoogeography  has  been  expanded. 
C;hapters  on  collecting  and  cleaning  methods,  covered 
f ulK  in  the  Seashells  \filume,  are  understandabK  absent, 
in  deference  to  .Australia  s  recent  collecting  restrictions 
as  well  as  opisthobranchs'  rare  standing  in  the  average 
shell  collection.  Nothing  is  mentioned,  however,  on  How- 
to  Photograph  Sea  Slugs,  which  would  have  been  enor- 
niousK  welcome,  since  the  photographs  of  li\  ing  animals 
(mam  in  obviousK  underwater  surroundings)  are  the 
highlight  of  this  book.  A  list  of  Western  Australian  shell 
clubs,  a  brief  glossary  (but  not  nicely  illustrated  as  in  the 
Seashells  volume),  and  taxonomic  index  conclude  the 
volume. 

By  this  book,  the  authors  have  sought  to  "stimulate 
interest"  and  "demonstate  both  what  is  know  n,  and  also 
what  is  not  known"  about  Western  -Australian  opistho- 
branchs. They  have  succeeded  on  both  counts  through 
their  recognition  of  ongoing  research  and  of  the  unre- 
solved taxonomic  problems  in  this  group.  Forty-five  spe- 
cies are  identified  to  genus-level  only  (or  with  a  tentative 
species  assignment),  with  some  noted  as  new  to  science 
(although,  appropriately,  none  are  originally  described 
in  this  book).  Over  half  are  stated  as  rare  or  uncommon; 
many  species  are  recorded  from  single  localities.  Ten 
species  were  described  in  the  1980  s,  another  10  in  the 
1990's  (4  in  1993),  as  credit  to  the  research  efforts  of  a 
number  of  active  opisthobranch  biologists.  One  photo- 
graph of  a  living  holotype  (Chromodoris  aurigera  Rud- 
man,  1990)  is  included  I  cannot  detect  any  glaring  iden- 
tification errors  (although  the  spelling  of  .Ajilustritlae  is 
incorrect),  and  I  happily  note  that  the  overall  SNStematic 
treatment  is  up-to-date  (perhaps  due  in  part  to  a  "who's 
who  "  list  of  contributors):  Akera  is  placed  in  .Anaspidea, 
CijUndrolmUa  in  Sacoglossa,  and  Apltistrum  anipluslre 
in  Ihjdatina,  three  recent  changes  often  overlooked  by 
non-specialists.  Some  might  contest  the  wording  of  a  few- 
evolutionary  statements  (e.g.,  "elysiids  have  lost  their 
shell"),  but  I  think  these  are  excusable  in  this  context. 

Wells  and  Bryce  have  elegantly  met  their  intended 
goal  to  illustrate  the  extraordinary  diversitv  of  living 
opisthobranchs  from  the  long,  winding  coastline  ot  West- 
ern Australia.  Attendees  at  future  Western  Australian 
Workshops  (the  next  one  in  the  Houtman  Abrolhos  in 
1994)  have  a  excellent  guide  to  follow . 

Paula  M.  Mikkelsen 


21^1     .3U 


INSTRUCTIONS  TO  AUTHORS 


THE  NAUTILUS  publishes  papers  on  all  aspects  of  the 
biology  and  systematics  of  mollusks.  Manuscripts  de- 
scribing original,  unpublished  research  as  well  as  review 
articles  will  be  considered.  Brief  articles,  not  exceeding 
1000  words,  will  be  published  as  notes  and  do  not  re- 
quire an  abstract.  Notices  of  meetings  and  other  items 
of  interest  to  malacologists  will  appear  in  a  news  and 
notices  section. 

Manuscripts:  Each  original  manuscript  and  accompa- 
nying illustrations  should  be  submitted  in  triplicate.  Text 
must  be  typed  on  one  side  of  8'/2  x  11  inch  white  paper, 
double  spaced  throughout  (including  literature  cited,  ta- 
bles and  figure  captions),  with  at  least  1  inch  of  margin 
on  all  sides.  All  pages  must  be  numbered  consecutively. 
If  printed  on  a  word  processor,  the  right  margin  should 
be  ragged  rather  than  justified.  Authors  should  follow 
the  recommendations  of  the  Council  of  Biology  Editors 
Style  Manual,  which  is  available  from  the  Council  of 
Biolog>  Editors,  Inc.,  9650  Rockville  Pike,  Bethesda,  MD 
20814,  U.S.A.  The  first  mention  of  a  scientific  name  in 
the  text  should  be  accompanied  by  the  taxonomic  au- 
thority, including  year.  Latin  names  and  words  to  be 
printed  in  italics  must  be  underlined;  leave  other  indi- 
cations to  the  editor.  Metric  and  Celsius  units  are  to  be 
used. 

The  sequence  of  sections  should  be:  title  page,  abstract 
page,  introduction,  materials  and  methods,  results,  dis- 
cussion, acknowledgements,  literature  cited,  tables,  fig- 
ure captions,  figures.  The  title  page  should  include  the 
title,  author's  name(s)  and  address(es).  The  abstract  page 
should  contain  the  title  and  abstract,  which  should  sum- 
marize in  250  words  or  less  the  scope,  main  results  and 
conclusions  of  the  paper.  The  abstract  may  be  followed 
by  a  maximum  of  8  key  words.  All  references  cited  in 
the  text  must  appear  in  the  literature  cited  section  and 
vice  versa.  In  the  literature  cited  section,  all  authors 
must  be  fully  identified  and  listed  alphabetically.  Follow 
a  recent  issue  of  THE  NAUTILUS  for  bibliographic  style, 
noting  that  journal  titles  must  be  unabbreviated.  Infor- 
mation on  plates  and  figures  should  be  cited  only  if  not 
included  in  the  pagination.  Tables  must  be  numbered 
and  each  placed  on  a  separate  sheet.  A  brief  legend  must 
accompany  each  table.  Captions  for  each  group  of  illus- 
trations should  be  typed  on  a  separate  sheet  and  include 
a  key  to  all  lettered  labeling  appearing  in  that  group  of 
illustrations. 


All  line  drawings  must  be  in  black,  high  quality  ink, 
clearly  detailed  and  completely  labeled.  Photographs 
must  be  on  glossy,  high  contrast  paper.  All  figures  are 
to  be  consecutively  numbered  (figs.  1,  2,  3,  ...  ,  NOT 
figs.  la.  lb,  Ic,  .  .  .  NOR  plate  1,  fig.  1  .  .  .).  Illustrations 
must  be  arranged  in  proportions  that  will  conform  with 
the  width  of  a  page  (6%  inches  or  171  mm)  or  a  column 
(3'/4  inches  or  82  mm).  Tlie  maximum  size  of  a  printed 
figure  is  6%  by  9  incites  or  171  by  228  mm.  All  illus- 
trations must  be  fully  cropped,  mounted  on  a  firm,  white 
backing,  numbered,  labeled  and  camera  ready.  The  au- 
thor s  name,  paper  title  and  figure  number(s)  should  ap- 
pear on  the  back.  Original  illustrations  must  be  between 
one  and  two  times  the  desired  final  size.  It  is  the  author  s 
responsibility  that  the  line  weight  and  lettering  are  ap- 
propriate for  the  desired  reduction.  Original  illustrations 
will  be  returned  to  the  author  if  requested.  Color  illus- 
trations can  be  included  at  extra  cost  to  the  author. 

Voucher  IVIaterial:  Deposition  of  type  material  in  a 
recognized  public  museum  is  a  requirement  for  publi- 
cation of  papers  in  which  new  species  are  described. 
Deposition  of  representative  voucher  specimens  in  such 
institutions  is  strongly  encouraged  for  all  other  types  of 
research  papers. 

Processing  of  Manuscripts:  Upon  receipt,  every  manu- 
script is  acknowledged  and  sent  for  critical  review  by  at 
least  two  referees.  These  reviews  serve  as  the  basis  for 
acceptance  or  rejection.  Accepted  manuscripts  are  re- 
turned to  the  author  for  consideration  of  the  reviewers' 
comments.  A  finalized  version  of  the  manuscript  is  re- 
turned to  the  editor  and  sent  to  press.  Two  sets  of  proofs 
are  sent  to  the  author  for  correction.  Changes  other  than 
typesetting  errors  will  be  charged  to  the  author  at  cost. 
One  set  of  corrected  proofs  should  be  sent  to  the  editor 
as  soon  as  possible.  Authors  with  institutional,  grant  or 
other  research  support  will  be  billed  for  page  charges  at 
the  rate  of  $60.00  per  printed  page. 

An  order  form  for  reprints  will  accompany  the  proofs. 
Reprints  ma\'  be  ordered  through  the  editor. 

Manuscripts,  corrected  proofs  and  correspondence  re- 
garding editorial  matters  should  be  sent  to:  Dr.  M.G. 
Harasewych,  Editor,  Di\ision  of  Mollusks,  NHB  stop  118, 
National  Museum  of  Natural  History,  Smithsonian  In- 
stitution, Washington,  DC  20560,  USA. 


@  This  paper  meets  ttie  requirements  of  ANSi/NISO  Z39. 48-1992  (Permanence  of  Paper). 


MBL/WHOI   LIBRARY 


IJH    17Yb    B