Skip to main content

Full text of "The New Testament in modern education"

See other formats


^^?^^o 


THE    NEW  TESTAMENT 

IN 

MODERN    EDUCATION 


THE    NEW    TESTAMENT 

IN 

MODERN    EDUCATION 


BY 


J.   MORGAN  JONES,   M.A. 

PROFESSOR   OK    CHURCH    HISTORY   AND    RELIGIOUS    EDUCATION 
INDERENUENT  COLLEGE,    BANGOK 


HODDER    AND    STOUGHTON 
LIMITED  LONDON 


TO 

MY    WIFE 

AND   TO 

OUR   THREE   CHILDREN 


PREFACE 

Recent  events  have  undoubtedly  brought  a  great  increase 
of  interest  in  the  significance  of  Morahty  and  ReHgion  for 
Education.  The  Science  and  Art  of  rehgious  Education 
are,  however,  still  in  their  infancy.  The  most  fundamental 
problems  still  await  scientific  discussion  and  a  practical 
solution.  The  specific  features  of  the  educational  ideal, 
the  definite  value  and  application  of  psychological  stud}'' 
and  its  results — both  personal  and  social — the  educational 
significance  of  Religion  and  Theology,  the  relation  between 
Home,  .School  and  Church  as  educational  agencies,  and 
many  similar  questions  still  represent  difficulties  that 
have  not  been  overcome. 

Rather  unfortunately,  almost  exclusive  attention  has 
been  given  to  the  elaboration  of  educational  methods,  to 
the  comparative  neglect  of  the  content  and  material  of 
moral  and  religious  instruction.  The  latter,  however, 
must  become  our  primary  study,  for  how  we  teach  must 
in  the  end  depend  upon  what  we  want  to  teach. 

So  far  the  Bible — and  that  the  mediaeval  Bible — has 
been  taken  for  granted  in  educational  discussion,  but  in 
reality  it  presents  a  problem  of  ultimate  significance. 
After  all,  why  should  we,  in  the  schools  of  the  twentieth 
century,  teach,  as  an  important  element  in  our  instruction, 
the  literature  and  history  of  an  ancient  Semitic  race  or  the 
fugitive  writings  of  a  little  group  of  Hellenistic  religious 
enthusiasts  of  the  first  century  ?  On  the  face  of  it  such 
a  question  demands  a  far  more  thorough  and  scientific 
discussion  than  has  yet  been  given  to  it.  Our  very  right 
to  live  comfortably  in  the  modern  world  as  distinguished 
from  the  Middle  Ages  depends  upon  the  answer  we  give 
to  it. 

The  following  chapters  are  intended  as  a  contribution 
to  this  initial  educational  discussion  of  the  Biblical  material 
in  so  far  as  it  concerns  the  New  Testament.  The  first  part 
of  the  book  deals  with  the  relation  between  religious  and 
modern  education  generally  ;  with  the  results  and  signi- 
ficance of  modern  Biblical  study  for  the  teacher  ;  with 
the  educational  interpretation  of  the  material  of  the  New 
Testament  ;    with   its   place   and   use   in   the   process   of 


vi     THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

education  ;  and  with  the  specific  task  of  the  teacher  of 
the  New  Testament.  The  second  part  discusses  the  main 
particular  problems  involved  in  teaching  the  New  Testa- 
ment— dealing  in  turn  with  the  Life,  Personality  and 
Teaching  of  Jesus  Christ  (special  chapters  being  devoted 
to  the  Parables  and  the  Miracles)  ;  with  the  Life  and 
Letters  of  the  Apostle  Paul  and  with  the  Johannine 
Literature,  while  the  last  chapter  attempts  to  summarize 
the  meaning  of  the  whole  discussion  and  to  give  a  com- 
prehensive appreciation  of  the  specific  educational  values 
of  the  New  Testament  in  relation  to  the  needs  and  interests 
of  our  modern  world. 

Among  the  needs  of  the  day  is  the  need  for  intelligent 
mediators  between  the  Biblical  expert  and  the  educational 
thinker — mediators  who  will  also  attempt  to  interpret 
both  these  to  the  studious  practical  teacher.  It  will  be 
seen  that  it  is  to  this  region  that  the  following  discussions 
belong.  They  all  attempt  to  make  some  vital  connection 
between  the  Christian  Gospel  of  the  New  Testament  as 
interpreted  by  Biblical  scholars,  and  modern  educational 
efforts  in  principle  and  practice. 

Naturally,  no  claim  to  originality  is  made  for  discussions 
of  this  kind,  but  it  is  hoped  that  they  reveal  throughout 
some  intimate  knowledge  of  what  the  scientific  educators 
and  of  what  the  scientific  theologians  have  to  say.  It  is 
hoped  that  they  also  show  the  influence  of  a  fairly  long 
and  useful  experience  of  the  actual  difficulties  and  needs 
of  modern  teachers  in  the  public  schools,  the  Sunday 
Schools  and  other  educational  institutions. 

I  am  glad  of  the  opportunity  to  acknowledge  my  debt 
to  American  writers  like  Dr.  Stanley  Hall  and  Professor 
G.  A.  Coe,  as  well  as  to  numerous  German  writings, 
especially  those  of  Professor  F.  Niebergall  of  Heidelberg. 
Much  of  the  substance  of  two  or  three  of  the  following 
chapters  was  published  some  years  ago  in  The  Christian 
Commonwealth,  and  I  thank  the  proprietors  for  their  kind 
consent  to  make  use  of  it  here.  Some  parts  of  the  opening 
chapters  were  delivered  as  lectures  at  the  Summer  School 
of  Biblical  Instruction  held  at  the  Normal  College,  Bangor, 
in  1920.  I  feel  very  much  indebted  also  to  my  friends, 
Principal  Rees  of  the  Independent  College,  Bangor,  and 
the  Rev.  H.  Harris-Hughes,  Bangor,  for  reading  the 
manuscript  and  for  making  many  useful  corrections  and 
suggestions. 

Independent  College, 
Bangor, 

5//^  August  1922. 


CONTENTS 


PART    I 

THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

CHAPTER  I 
The  Christian  Teacher  and  Modern  Education         .  .        3 


PAGE 


CHAPTER  II 

The  New  Testament  and  the  Christian  Teacher       .  .      24 

CHAPTER  III 
The  Place  of  the  New  Testament  in  Education        ,  .      44 

CHAPTER  IV 
The  Educational  Interpretation  of  the  New  Testament  .      63 

CHAPTER  V 
The  Modern  Use  of  the  New  Testament  .  ,  .79 

CHAPTER  VI 
The  Christian  Teachet^  and  his  Task     .  .  .  .104 


viii    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

PART    II 

TEACHING  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT:    ITS  MAIN 
PROBLEMS 

CHAPTER  VII 

PAGE 

The  Life  of  Jesus  for  Childhood.  .  .  .  123 

CHAPTER  VIII 
The  Synoptic  Presentation  of  Christ  for  Adolescence       .     145 

CHAPTER  IX 
Teaching  the  Parables         .  .  .  .  .  .161 

CHAPTER  X 
The  Problem  of  the  Miracles        .  .  .  .  .181 

CHAPTER  XI 
The  Birth  and  Resurrection  of  Jesus    ....    203 

CHAPTER  XII 
The  Apostle  Paul  and  his  Letters  ....    226 

CHAPTER  XIII 
The  Johannine  Literature,  Thought  and  Life  .  .    257 

CHAPTER  XIV 
Jesus  Christ  and  the  Kingdom  of  God    ....    282 


PART  I 
THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 


I.  The  Christian  Teacher  and  Modern  Education. 

II.  The  New  Testament  and  the  Christian  Teacher. 
III.  The  Place  of  the  New  Testament  in  Education. 
IV.  The  Educational  Interpretation  of  the  New  Testament. 

V.  The  Modern  Use  of  the  New  Testament. 
VI.  The  Christian  Teacher  and  his  Task. 


CHAPTER    I 

THE    CHRISTIAN   TEACHER   AND    MODERN   EDUCATION 

1.  Introductory. — Christianity  and  the  Modern  Educational  Movement. 

2.  Educational    Principles. — Psychological    Basis — Periods    of    Moral 

and  Rehgious  Growth — The  Moral  Aim  of  Education — The 
Christian  Ideal — The  Value  of  Systematic  Instruction — The 
Place  of  Religion  in  Education. 

3.  Educational  Methods. — The  Impressionist  School — The  Method  of 

Systematic  Presentation — The  Method  of  Questioning  —  The 
Need  of  Variety  in  Methods — The  Need  of  a  New  Spirit. 


INTRODUCTORY 

It  is  only  upon  the  background  of  Education  in  general 
that  the  place  and  significance  of  instruction  in  the  New 
Testament  can  be  properly  appreciated.  Life  is  one,  and 
we  must  strive  to  gather  all  our  educational  efforts  into 
some  kind  of  unity.  We  fail  indeed  to  appreciate  one 
of  the  main  contributions  of  Religion  and  of  the  New 
Testament  if  we  miss  their  power  to  unify  all  life  and 
education.  On  the  other  hand,  the  Christian  teacher 
who  does  not  bring  his  task  into  effective  contact  with 
the  store  of  inspiration  gathered  for  him  by  the  modern 
educational  movement  starves  himself  in  the  land  of 
plenty  and  devitalizes  his  material.  He  needs  the  modern 
educator  as  well  as  the  Biblical  scholar  before  he  can 
fully  enter  into  his  own  proper  heritage.  They  also 
need  what  the  Christian  teacher  alone  can  give  them 
before  they  can  find  and  perform  their  proper  function 
in  life. 

It  is  true  that  the  voice  of  the  great  educators  has  often 
been  smothered  by  the  exigencies  of  politics  and  by  the 
bickerings  of  the  sects.     In  spite  of  that,  however,  their 


4      THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

united  message  has  become  the  common  heritage  of  all 
civiHzed  lands.  All  appearances  to  the  contrary,  there 
does  now  exist  a  more  or  less  coherent  body  of  educational 
principles  to  which  all  intelligent  teachers  confess  their 
willing  obedience,  and  which  provides  a  working  basis  for 
all  future  effort. 

What  is  curious,  if  not  tragic,  in  the  history  of  modern 
education  is  that  though  this  body  of  principles  owes  far 
more  to  the  inspiration  of  the  New  Testament  than  to  any 
other  cause,  yet  it  is  the  organized  educational  institu- 
tions of  Christianity  itself  that  have  come  least  of  all 
under  the  broadening  influences  of  the  great  educators. 
On  the  other  hand,  it  is  quite  as  true  that  modern  educa- 
tion has  not  yet  by  any  means  exhausted  the  inspiration 
which  the  Christian  Gospel  both  in  itself  and  in  its  history 
is  capable  of  contributing  to  the  common  task  of  training 
men  and  nations. 

There  is  therefore  a  twofold  task  before  the  Christian 
Church  in  this  connection.  One  is  the  task  of  assimilating 
modern  educational  principles  and  methods  for  the  pur- 
poses of  religious  instruction.  The  other  is  the  task  of 
using  the  Christian  Gospel  more  and  more  for  the  purpose 
of  enriching  the  principles  and  practice  of  education  in 
general. 

This  discussion  therefore  starts  with  the  willing  con- 
fession that  for  us  the  fundamental  principles  which  have 
sprung  from  the  thought  and  activities  of  the  great 
educators  possess  a  general  validity.  Many  of  these 
principles  have  found  rough  expression  in  such  well- 
known  catch-phrases  as  '  respect  for  personality,'  *  develop- 
ment from  within,'  *  development  all  round,'  '  freedom 
through  obedience,'  *  many-sided  interest,'  '  learning  by 
doing,'  '  the  concrete  before  the  abstract,'  '  no  impression 
without  expression,'  '  educative  instruction,'  and  many 
others  of  a  similar  character.  It  is  true  that  these  have 
been  gathered  from  almost  all  schools  of  educational 
thought  —  whose  most  enthusiastic  disciples  are  still 
quarrelling  over  their  exclusive  claims  to  attention.  The 
sober-minded  teacher  will,  however,  be  ready  to  welcome 
them  all  as  valuable  contributions  to  the  Science  and  Art 
of  Education,  and  will  give  to  none  of  them  the  exclusive 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION     5 

right  to  dominate  his  theory  and  practice.  As  catch- 
words they  are  useful  to  remind  him  of  the  many  varied 
elements  that  must  enter  into  the  process  of  making  men 
and  women.  It  has  already  been  suggested  that  there 
is  a  definite  historical  reason  why  such  principles  and 
methods  as  these  phrases  imply  should  be  more  directly 
and  effectively  apphcable  to  the  teaching  of  morality  and 
religion  than  to  any  other  part  of  education.  They  have, 
as  a  matter  of  fact,  been  almost  all  directly  suggested  by 
the  Christian  Gospel  itself. 


2 

EDUCATIONAL  PRINCIPLES 

Some  of  these  principles  as  being  most  germane  to  our 
purpose  require  a  fuller  discussion  and  definition.  They 
concern  the  psychological  basis  of  education,  its  moral 
end,  the  value  of  instruction  and  the  central  place  of 
religion  in  it. 

Psychological   Basis   of   Education 

I .  There  is  no  matter  with  regard  to  which  we  can 
count  upon  such  general  agreement  as  the  appeal  to  human 
nature  for  guidance  in  the  forinulation  of  educational 
principles  and  methods.  Nothing  is  so  characteristic  of 
modern  education  as  the  earnestness,  persistence  and 
enthusiasm  with  which  it  has  carried  on  the  study  of  the 
nature  and  growth  of  the  child — physically,  intellectually 
and  spiritually.  If  anything,  its  trust  in  the  infallibility 
of  the  results  of  its  psychological  studies  is  in  danger  of 
becoming  too  absolute.  We  have  not  been  reminded  too 
often  that  we  must  know  '  John  '  thoroughly,  if  we  want 
to  teach  him  '  Latin.'  There  has,  however,  been  some 
danger  of  forgetting  that  we  must  also  know  '  Latin,' 
and  that  no  amount  of  psychological  study  will  provide 
us  with  the  intellectual  material  or  the  moral  ideal  with 
which  we  want  to  bring  '  John  '  into  effective  contact. 
Nevertheless,  there  can  be  no  doubt  that  child-study  in 


6      THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

all  its  aspects  represents  by  far  the  most  fruitful  factor 
in  the  triumph  of  the  modern  educational  movement, 
and  that  in  the  results  of  that  study,  in  spite  of  some 
vagaries,  a  vast  amount  of  authentic  material  is  now 
available  for  effective  use  in  the  practice  of  education. 

The  study  has  already  been  and  will  be  more  and  more 
a  very  healthy  influence  in  the  region  of  moral  and 
religious  instruction.  We  now  fully  realize,  or  we  ought, 
at  any  rate,  to  have  fully  realized  that  it  is  neither  the 
teacher  nor  the  theology,  neither  the  Church  nor  the 
Bible  which  should  have  the  primary  consideration,  but 
the  need  and  capacity  of  the  child.  The  religious 
teacher,  like  every  other,  must  reckon  with  heredity, 
temperament,  varied  capacities  and  interests.  The  soul 
is  amenable  to  influence,  and  it  is  true  that  even 
ordinary  people  are  capable  of  far  greater  things  in 
the  moral  and  religious  life  than  we  have  dreamt. 
That,  however,  does  not  alter  the  fact  that  we  cannot 
make  a  prophet  or  a  religious  genius  at  our  will,  any 
more  than  we  can  make  a  great  musician  or  a  great  painter. 
We  must  not  teach  as  if  we  expected  all  our  pupils  to  reach 
the  same  high  level  of  moral  and  religious  experience  as 
Paul  or  Augustine  or  Luther,  nor  must  we  expect  them 
all  to  repeat  the  same  type  of  experience.  The  Christian 
teacher  is  dealing  with  the  same  limitations  set  by 
heredity,  temperament  and  capacity  as  all  other  teachers. 
He  is  also  making  use  of  the  same  psychological  processes, 
while  the  formal  educative  movements  of  the  inner  life 
are  much  the  same,  whatever  may  be  the  ultimate  end  in 
view.  The  results  of  psychological  study  in  these  regions, 
the  teacher  of  the  New  Testament  must  accept  in  common 
with  all  other  teachers. 

Periods  of  Moral  and  Religious  Growth 

It  has  also  become  clear  that  the  child,  in  morality 
and  religion  as  in  all  other  aspects  of  his  life,  passes 
through  definite  and  well-marked  stages  of  growth  and 
development  in  capacity  and  need.  Before  maturity  is 
reached,  the  growing  soul  passes  through  three  different 
levels  of  life  which  are  often  said  with  some  truth  to 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION      7 

correspond  more  or  less  roughly  with  the  gradual  develop- 
ment of  the  race.  They  are  Infancy  (up  to  about  seven 
years  of  age),  Childhood  (from  about  seven  to  twelve  or 
thirteen)  and  Adolescence  (lasting  up  to  about  twenty- 
four  or  twenty-five  and  often  longer).  The  general 
features  of  these  periods  are  also  well  known.  We  are 
here  concerned  with  them  only  in  so  far  as  they  bear  more 
or  less  directly  upon  moral  and  religious  instruction. 
From  this  point  of  view  they  are  the  wonder,  the  imitative 
and  play  instincts  of  Infancy ;  the  imagination  and 
curiosity,  the  receptive  memory,  the  personal  interest, 
the  growing  historical  sense,  the  demand  for  uniformity 
and  the  growing  conscience  of  Childhood ;  the  self- 
assertion,  the  social  interest,  the  greater  intellectual  under- 
standing and  hero-worship ;  the  storm  and  stress,  the 
reflection  and  idealism  ;  the  constructive  thought  and 
sense  of  responsibihty  of  Adolescence  in  its  successive 
stages  of  early  (twelve  to  fifteen),  middle  (fifteen  to 
eighteen)  and  late  (eighteen  to  twenty-four)  youth. 

This  educational  Psychology  has  also  brought  a  good 
deal  of  insight  into  the  processes  which  are  involved  in 
the  direction  of  instincts,  the  formation  of  habits,  the 
growth  of  knowledge,  the  training  of  the  moral  judgment 
and  the  control  of  the  will,  though  we  have  a  long  way 
yet  to  go  before  we  can  walk  with  any  certainty  in  some 
of  these  directions. 

It  is  clear,  therefore,  that  the  organized  agencies  of 
moral  and  religious  education,  both  in  their  ideals  and 
methods,  as  well  as  in  the  use  they  make  of  the  material 
at  their  disposal,  lag  far  behind  even  our  present  imperfect 
scientific  knowledge  of  child-life.  A  very  great  deal, 
however,  still  remains  to  be  done  before  we  have  laid 
broad  and  firm  the  psychological  basis  of  moral  and 
religious  education.  To  understand  and  make  effective 
use  of  the  needs  and  interests  and  values  that  dominate 
the  lives  of  modern  youths  and  adults  in  Church  and  out 
of  it,  in  the  town  and  in  the  country,  in  the  Trade  Union 
and  in  the  office,  at  work,  at  school  and  at  play  will 
require  a  much  more  comprehensive,  accurate  and  patient 
psychological  study  than  has  yet  been  dreamed  of.  We 
are  really  only  at  the  very  beginning  of  an  educational 


8      THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

psychology  in  any  scientific  sense.  At  its  best,  however, 
we  must  guard  against  making  a  fetish  of  child-study 
and  its  developments,  for  it  can  by  no  means  give  us 
everything  that  we  need  for  our  task.  There  will  always 
be  a  margin  of  unexpectedness  about  the  individual  child 
which  our  general  and  average  formulae  will  not  cover, 
and  which  we  must  learn  patiently  to  know  and  to  value 
for  itself  in  each  case.  Child-study  may  help  us  to 
enumerate  and  classify  the  motives,  the  interests,  capacities 
and  needs  to  which  we  can  appeal.  It  may  reveal  to  us 
the  different  reactions  to  be  expected  in  answer  to  the 
influences  we  bring  to  bear  upon  the  child  or  youth.  It 
may  enable  us  to  analyse  more  and  more  accurately  and 
fully  the  various  elements  and  steps  in  the  educative 
process.  It  may  thus  help  us  to  realize  that  whatever 
end  we  may  propose  for  our  education  must  conform 
to  certain  fundamental  characteristics  of  human  nature, 
but  it  cannot  possibly  provide  us  with  that  end  itself. 
It  may  give  us  guidance  with  regard  to  the  forms  into 
which  we  can  put  that  end,  but  its  real  content  we  must 
get  in  some  other  way  and  by  a  far  wider  sweep  than 
any  mere  Psychology  can  take.  We  must  never  be 
tempted  to  believe  that  we  can  spin  out  the  aim  and  the 
moral  ideal  of  education  out  of  a  mere  analysis  of  the 
psychological  processes. 

In  fact.  Education  is  not  a  circle  with  one  centre,  but 
an  ellipse  with  two  foci — one  of  which  is  represented  by 
the  child,  and  the  other  the  end  for  which  he  is  to  be 
trained.  They,  of  course,  must  correspond  with  each 
other.  That  is  why  education  can  never  be  adequately 
described  in  terms  of  mere  natural  development,  and  we 
can  never  get  rid  of  the  element  of  direction  and  control 
from  above,  be  the  control  as  congenial  and  as  unobtrusive 
as  it  may.  The  discussion  of  the  ultimate  end  of  education, 
therefore,  is  to  some  extent  at  least  an  independent  study,  and 
must  have  a  place  of  its  own  in  the  Science  of  Education. 

The  Moral  Aim  of  Education 

2.  Modern  educators  are  by  this  time  in  general  agree- 
ment with  regard  to  the  moral  nature  of  the  ultimate  aim 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION     9 

in  view.  They  would  probably  be  ready  to  describe  it 
as  the  formation  and  sustenance  not  simply  of  a  full, 
rich,  ideal  human  character,  but  rather  of  a  fully  developed, 
free  personality  in  the  case  of  each  pupil — a  personality 
developed  to  the  fullest  extent,  variety  and  wealth,  of 
which  the  general  and  individual  nature  of  each  pupil  is 
capable  as  a  member  of  the  human  community.  As 
usually  expressed,  this  description  requires  more  accurate 
definition,  if  not  also  an  enlargement  of  its  scope,  to  make 
it  of  real  use.  It  is  lacking  in  substance  and  content. 
We  are  at  once  brought  face  to  face  with  the  critical 
question  of  what  kind  of  character  and  what  type  of 
personality  our  education  is  supposed  to  promote  and 
guard.  It  is  here  that  we  are  in  urgent  need  of  guidance, 
and  it  is  here  that  most  modern  educational  discussion 
leaves  us  in  the  lurch,  and  it  is  here  also  that  we  begin  to 
hear  the  vital  challenge  of  the  Christian  Religion. 

The  prevalent  idea  seems    to  be  that  the  ideal  must 
of  necessity  be  of  this  vague  character,  and  that    each 
individual   must  somehow  or  other  choose  his  own  ideal. 
The  truth  of  this  is,  of  course,   that  the  educational  aim 
must  be  plastic  enough  to  allow  of  the  utmost  variety. 
It  must,  however,  be  variety  within  the  range  of  some 
unity  however  wide,  or  it  will  become  meaningless  and 
dissolve  into  nothing.     The  real  fact  is  that  behind  every 
fresh  development  of  the  Science  of  Education  there  has 
been  a  fairly  consistent  view  of  the  character  of  the  ideal 
even  when  it  did  not  attain  to  definite  expression.     Still 
more  is  it  the  case  that  every  great  system  of  practical 
education   has   been   consciously   or   unconsciously   based 
upon  some  very  definite  conception  of  the  ideal  life  and 
its  qualities.     It  must  always  be  so,  whether  educational 
theory   provides   such   an   ideal   or   not.     Unfortunately, 
what  has  happened  is  that  in  the  absence  of  any  thorough 
discussion  of  the  comparative  value  of  conflicting  ethical 
ideals,  educational  practice  has  seldom  risen  above  the 
level  of  '  the  good  patriot,'  '  the  good  citizen,'  '  the  good 
workman,'  '  the  English  gentleman,'  *  the  good  Catholic  ' 
or  '  the  good  Protestant.' 

Now,  the  vital  challenge  of  the  Christian  Gospel  and 
the  New  Testament  to  modern  education  is  that  they  do 


10    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

actually  provide  an  ideal  of  personality  and  character, 
capable  of  universal  application,  comprehensive  enough 
to  serve  as  the  ultimate  moral  aim  of  all  education.  It  is 
revealed,  on  the  one  hand,  in  the  personality  and  character 
of  Jesus  Christ,  and,  on  the  other  hand,  in  the  Kingdom 
of  God,  combining  in  one  coherent  whole  both  the  in- 
dividual and  the  social  aspects  of  the  moral  ideal. 

The  Christian  Ideal 

Here  also  we  cannot,  it  is  true,  avoid  the  conflict  of 
interpretation,  but  that  conflict  itself  is  in  fact  only  an 
added  tribute  to  the  educational  value  of  the  Christian 
standard,  for  what  its  history  essentially  reveals  is  the 
possibility  of  an  ever-renewed  application  of  the  person- 
ality of  Jesus  and  the  life  of  the  Kingdom  to  the  need 
and  capacity  of  age  after  age.  It  is  one  of  the  great 
tasks  of  the  Christian  Church  to  think  and  live  itself  more 
and  more  fully  into  the  variety  of  that  interpretation  and 
application,  as  it  must  become  one  of  the  tasks  of  the 
modern  educator  to  use  its  material  to  fill  with  richer 
content  the  empty  forms  in  which  he  is  apt  to  present 
the  ultimate  end  of  education.  If  the  formation  of 
character  and  the  growth  of  personality  or  a  society  of 
personalities  are  to  take  their  place  effectively  as  the  final 
end  of  education,  the  problem  of  the  kind  of  character 
and  the  type  of  personality  which  are  worth  perpetuating 
must  more  and  more  secure  the  concentrated  attention 
of  educational  thinkers.  It  is  certainly  the  bounden  duty 
of  the  Christian  teacher  to  secure  the  adoption  of  the 
personal  spirit  of  Jesus  and  the  Kingdom  of  God  as  the 
ultimate  end  of  all  education.  To  succeed  in  such  a  task 
he  will  have  to  meet  at  least  two  elementary  conditions  : 

(a)  He  must  be  prepared  to  analyse  the  spirit  and  life 
of  Jesus  and  the  Kingdom  in  such  a  way  as  to  distinguish 
between  those  elements  in  all  historical  presentations  of 
them  which  were  merely  temporary  and  those  which  can 
lay  claim  to  some  permanent  validity. 

(b)  He  must  be  ready  to  recognize  the  existence  and 
partial  validity  of  a  large  number  of  subsidiary  educational 
aims,  which  he  must  be  able  to  co-ordinate  and  organize 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION     ii 

into  a  system  with  the  ultimate  end  as  its  centre  and  final 
sanction.  Somehow  or  other,  in  order  to  maintain  its 
supreme  sway,  the  ultimate  ideal  proposed  must  include 
in  itself  and  justify  all  other  legitimate  and  worthy  aims. 
The  Christian  teacher  has  no  right  to  propose  the  Christian 
ideal  as  a  standard  unless  he  is  able  to  show  how  it  coheres 
with  and  includes  such  well-established  educational  aims 
as  earning  a  living,  gaining  knowledge,  self-realization, 
harmonious  development,  moral  character  and  social 
efficiency. 

There  is  therefore  a  great  deal  of  work  still  to  do 
before  it  can  be  said  that  either  Christian  or  general 
educational  thinking  has  exhausted  the  possibilities  of 
discussion  with  regard  to  the  ultimate  end  of  education. 
Its  problems  must  always  be  borne  in  mind  by  the  teacher 
of  the  New  Testament. 

The  recent  and  increasing  tendency  among  both 
philosophers  and  theologians  following  in  the  footsteps 
of  the  economists  to  express  the  meaning  of  life  and  the 
world  in  terms  of  '  value  '  ought  to  be  a  great  help  to  the 
fruitful  discussion  of  such  questions  as  these.  The  fresh 
category  of  '  value  ' — intrinsic  and  instrumental — is  being 
used  more  and  more  extensively  in  all  ethical,  philos- 
ophical and  even  metaphysical  discussions,  and  may  yet 
provide  the  common  ground  so  much  needed  in  order  to 
approach  the  solution  of  such  central  problems  as  the 
ultimate  end  of  education  and  its  content. 

The  Value  of  Systematic  Instruction 

3 .  We  come  to  a  somewhat  different  question  when  we 
deal  with  the  exact  value  of  systematic  instruction  in  the 
general  process  of  education,  and  especially  of  education 
in  morality  and  religion.  It  is  still  the  subject  of  some- 
what heated  controversy.  The  old  confusion  between 
education  and  instruction  is  now  largely  a  thing  of  the 
past.  The  organization  of  personal  intercourse  and  ex- 
perience, and  indeed  of  the  whole  environment  of  the  pupil, 
has  found  its  own  special  place  alongside  of  systematic 
instruction.  The  disciples  of  Herbart  are,  of  course,  the 
most  enthusiastic  sponsors  of  definite  and  direct  systematic 


12    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

instruction,  and  especially  of  '  educative  '  instruction  as 
central  and  essential  to  any  efficient  system  of  education. 
The  insistence  on  the  fact  that  instruction  may  have  a 
definite  formative  moral  value  represents  one  of  the  great 
services  of  Herbart  in  the  history  of  modern  education. 
By  this  is  meant  that  some  ideas,  when  presented  in  the 
proper  way  and  at  the  proper  time,  can  and  do  become 
living  forces  in  the  formation  of  character.  They  acquire 
power  to  create  spontaneously  and  almost  automatically 
feelings  of  living  interest,  to  grip  the  mind  and  to  direct 
as  well  as  to  strengthen  the  will.  Certain  kinds  of  know- 
ledge given  in  the  right  way  and  at  the  right  time  can 
produce  a  moral  and  religious  change.  It  is  difficult  to 
see  how  that  can  legitimately  be  denied.  We  may  add, 
it  is  true,  that  though  instruction  may  have  a  value  of 
its  own,  if  it  is  of  the  right  kind,  yet  it  is  never  fully  and 
morally  effective  apart  from  the  spontaneous  self-activity 
of  the  pupil,  the  personality  of  the  teacher  and  the 
organization  of  the  environment. 

It  is  true  also  that  before  any  satisfactory  and  satisfy- 
ing conclusion  can  be  reached  with  regard  to  the  value  of 
instruction  as  a  means  of  education,  we  stand  in  need  of  a 
much  more  thorough  investigation  of  such  problems  as 
the  following  :  What  kind  of  ideas  or  principles  or  con- 
victions or  knowledge  has  naturally  or  can  acquire  this 
formative  power  ?  Why  and  how  does  instruction  become 
*  educative  '  ?  By  what  process  does  an  idea  become  an 
ideal ? 

Herbart 's  analysis  of  the  process  of  Apperception  and 
his  doctrine  of  Interest  reveal  some  important  links  in 
the  chain  which  connects  the  idea  with  the  will ;  but,  gener- 
ally speaking,  it  may  be  said  that  the  specific  value  of 
instruction  is  taken  for  granted  rather  than  realized  in 
detail  by  the  educational  Psychologists.  If  the  great 
motive  which  leads  to  moral  activity  is  a  sense  of  value 
in  some  '  good,'  then  ideas  become  educative  in  so  far 
as  they  represent  *  values  ' — ^intrinsic  or  instrumental — 
and  only  by  some  systematic  instruction  can  any  adequate 
knowledge  be  brought  of  these  values  and  ideals  as  well 
as  of  the  various  ways  and  means  of  reaching  them. 
Definite  instruction  provides  also  the  only  means  of  en- 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION     13 

larging  the  narrow  range  of  personal  experience  and  inter- 
course ;  and  since  perception  without  conception  is  bhnd 
and  wa5rward,  it  provides  the  only  means  also  of  using 
systematic  thought  for  the  necessary  interpretation  of 
experience. 

These  and  other  similar  observations  seem  to  rule  out 
of  court  the  theories  of  all  those  who  seem  prepared  to 
banish  all  definite  and  systematic  instruction  from  the 
teaching  of  morality  and  religion,  and  the  teacher  of  the 
New  Testament  can  still  remain  confident  that  he  is 
betraying  no  educational  principles  when  he  is  using  its 
material  for  the  direct  and  indirect  presentation  of  moral 
and  spiritual  values,  as  well  as  of  the  means  of  reaching 
them. 

The  Place  of  Religion  in  Education 

4.  It  is  now  almost  universally  recognized  that 
religion  in  its  deepest  and  broadest  sense  is  an  important, 
if  not  a  central,  constituent  in  all  effective  education.  It 
is  so  because  religion  is  a  primary  fact  in  human  nature 
and  history — "  an  entirely  natural  product  of  the  human 
soul  in  its  intercourse  with  the  material  world  and  with 
other  souls."  This  statement,  however,  requires  to  be 
qualified  in  several  ways  before  it  can  yet  be  claimed  as  an 
effective  confession  of  modern  education. 

In  many  cases,  though  based  upon  undoubted  psy- 
chological and  historical  facts,  the  recognition  of  religion 
amounts  to  little  more  than  a  formal  acknowledgment 
without  any  very  strenuous  attempt  to  make  practical 
application  of  the  principle.  Even  where  religious  in- 
struction may  take  an  important  place  in  the  curriculum, 
it  remains  more  often  than  not  a  mere  excrescence. 
Seldom  indeed  is  any  serious  attempt  made  to  bring 
religion  into  any  vital  co-ordination  with  the  teaching 
as  a  whole,  with  the  result  that  a  position  of  '  splendid 
isolation  '  becomes  merely  another  name  for  a  degrad- 
ing ineffectiveness.  This  failure  is,  of  course,  due  quite 
as  much  to  the  persistent  intellectual  and  practical  dual- 
ism of  religious  teachers  as  to  the  lack  of  educational 
thoroughness. 


14    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  educational  attitude  towards  religion  suffers  also 
from  a  persistent  vagueness  in  the  use  of  the  term, 
corresponding  to  the  vagueness  in  the  definition  of  the 
moral  aim  of  education  which  has  already  been  referred  to. 
It  is  true  that  there  is  a  religious  spirit  and  attitude  behind 
and  beyond  every  particular  form  of  religion,  but  that 
spirit  does  not  exist  in  and  for  itself  without  definite 
expression  in  one  of  the  many  types  of  religious  life  and 
character.  It  cannot  be  cultivated  in  vacuo,  but  always 
in  and  through  one  or  other  of  these  types.  The  challenge 
of  Christianity  to  modern  education  is  that  for  its  pur- 
poses there  cannot  be  found  a  higher  and  more  compre- 
hensive form  of  the  religious  life  and  spirit  than  that 
which  is  incorporated  in  the  Christian  Gospel  and  the 
New  Testament. 

We  need  to  be  reminded  also  that  this  acknowledgment 
of  religion  by  the  modern  educator  does  not  settle,  and  is 
not  intended  to  settle,;  the  question  of  when  and  where 
'  religious  instruction  '  should  be  given — ^whether  as 
definite  lessons  or  through  the  ordinary  subjects  of  litera- 
ture or  history  or  science,  whether  by  the  State  or  by  the 
Church  or  by  both.  It  does  imply,  however,  that  whenever 
or  wherever  or  by  whomsoever  it  may  be  given,  it  must 
be  in  relation  to  and  co-ordinate  with  that  whole  system 
of  values  which  education  in  general  is  intended  to  pro- 
mote. It  is  also  implied  that  it  is  always  the  business  of 
the  educator  to  recognize  that  religion  is  a  primary  and 
essential  factor  in  the  making  of  men  and  women,  and 
that  it  is  a  part  of  his  task  to  see  that  full  and  proper 
provision  is  made  in  the  general  education  of  the  nation 
for  the  training  of  the  religious  side  and  for  the  satis- 
faction of  the  religious  needs  of  human  nature.  It  is 
his  business  also  to  suggest  the  best  and  most  effective 
material  for  that  purpose.  And  here  the  question  with 
which  we  are  really  concerned  is  how  far  and  in  what  sense 
the  New  Testament  is  capable  of  supplying  that  need. 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION    15 

3 

EDUCATIONAL  METHODS 

Modern  Educational  Methods 

This  discussion  of  the  educational  heritage  of  which 
the  Christian  teacher  is  the  natural  heir  would  not  be 
complete  without  some  reference  to  the  expert  guidance 
which  is  at  his  disposal  for  the  task  of  organizing  his 
material  and  transmitting  it  in  the  most  effective  way. 
He  is,  of  course,  not  called  upon  nor  expected  to  apply 
slavishly  to  morality  and  religion  the  particular  methods 
of  modern  teachers  of  other  subjects.  It  is  the  general 
principles  underlying  all  particular  methods  that  he  needs, 
first  of  all,  to  assimilate.  On  the  other  hand,  he  must 
not  forget  that  in  dealing  with  the  Bible  he  is  also  dealing 
with  what  is  essentially  the  material  of  Literature  and 
History — and  that  the  experts  in  teaching  these  subjects 
have  a  great  deal  to  teach  him  too  with  regard  to  the 
educational  interpretation  of  his  material  and  its  proper 
grading  for  different  ages,  and  also  with  regard  to  the 
form,  arrangement  and  presentation  of  his  material. 
But  the  expert  advice  must  always  be  adapted  to  the 
peculiar  character  and  characteristics  of  the  Biblical 
Literature  and  History  with  which  the  Christian  teacher 
is  definitely  dealing. 

Up  till  very  recently  the  method  that  dominated  all 
education  and  instruction  was  that  of  an  almost  mechanical 
memorizing.  The  teacher  simply  acted  as  the  transmitter 
of  the  stuff — his  business  being  to  put  it  into  the  form 
most  suitable  for  its  effective  gripping  of  the  verbal 
memory.  This,  at  any  rate,  describes  the  method  in  its 
extreme  form. 

By  this  time  the  pendulum  has  swung  completely 
over  to  the  other  extreme  in  the  Montessori  method  ;  and 
though  it  may  be  blasphemy  to  suggest  such  a  thing,  a 
malicious  opponent  might  be  led  to  say  that  we  have 
here  a  signal  instance  of  how  extremes  meet.  In  both 
the  oldest  and  the  newest  method  the  teacher  does  not 
teach,   but   simply  stands   by  watching  the   child   learn. 


i6    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

In  very  different  forms  both  extremes  reveal  an  almost 
incredible  credulity  with  regard  to  the  unaided  capacity 
of  the  human  young  to  teach  himself  if  he  is  left  alone. 

Such  a  view,  however,  would  represent  only  a  very 
superficial  and  popular  interpretation  or  misrepresentation 
of  Dr.  Montessori's  almost  unique  services  to  the  Science 
and  Art  of  Education.  If  the  Montessori  teacher  can 
afford  to  '  stand  and  wait  ' — acting  as  a  kind  of  living 
reference  book,  only  to  be  used  in  emergencies — that  is 
because  his  work  has  already  been  done  thoroughly  in  the 
selection  and  organization  of  the  whole  environment  of 
the  child.  The  mere  possibility  of  such  a  misrepresenta- 
tion, however,  may  serve  as  a  warning  to  the  unwary 
when  they  are  tempted  superficially  to  imitate  a  genius. 

The  valuable  experiments  of  Dr.  Montessori  are  un- 
doubtedly destined  to  exercise  a  very  healthy  influence 
upon  the  whole  conception  of  education  ;  but  so  far  as  the 
teaching  of  morality  and  religion  is  concerned,  they  are 
only  at  their  preliminary  stage.  They  may  before  long 
challenge  the  right  of  definite  and  systematic  instruction 
in  morality  and  religion,  as  they  have  already  shown  the 
need  for  a  radical  reconsideration  and  reorganization  of 
the  environment  now  provided  by  religious  institutions. 
We  are  not  yet,  however,  in  a  position  to  discuss  the 
relation  of  the  Montessori  method  to  the  teaching  of  the 
older  children  and  adolescents,  with  which  we  are  here 
mainly  concerned. 

In  any  case,  we  must  not  let  this  universal  reaction 
against  the  mechanical  memorizing  of  the  past  blind  us 
to  the  fact  that  there  is  a  place  for  the  appeal  to  the 
memory.  In  its  own  place  and  under  proper  conditions 
that  appeal  is  an  essential  element  in  any  well-ordered 
system  of  instruction.  All  effective  education,  in  fact, 
depends  upon  it.  The  claim  of  modern  methods  is  that 
they  do  store  the  memory  with  what  is  needed  for  the 
guidance  of  life,  and  with  far  richer  resources  than  any 
mechanical  learning  by  rote  can  ever  do.  It  is  very 
probable  also  that  the  reaction  even  against  mechanical 
memorizing  has  gone  too  far. 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION     17 


The  Impressionist  School  of  Method 

Apart  from  this,  the  main  educational  methods  at 
present  in  vogue  fall  into  three  main  types.  Rather 
exclusive  claims  have  been  sometimes  made  on  behalf  of 
each  of  these,  but  as  a  matter  of  fact  they  are  not  incon- 
sistent with  one  another.  They  may  be  called  respectively 
the  Impressionist,  the  Constructive  and  the  Argumentative 
School  of  Method.  The  Impressionist  method  implies 
that  the  teacher  is  an  artist  whose  delight  is  in  depicting 
vivid  and  dramatic  scenes  with  a  lavish  and  loving  brush. 
His  business  is  to  arouse  active  sentiments  of  wonder, 
admiration  and  love  by  fixing  living  pictures  in  the  mind. 
He  aims  at  reaching  the  will  mainly  through  the  imagina- 
tion and  the  emotions.  Hence  his  cry  is  for  story-telling, 
more  story-telling  and  still  more  story-telling.  He  makes 
the  bread  of  stories  out  of  wood  and  stone,  and  one  would 
not  be  surprised  to  find  mathematical  tables  at  any  time 
become  changed  under  the  magic  wand  into  a  fairy  tale 
or  a  heroic  saga.  The  story-telling  teacher  takes  pleasure 
in  enlarging  upon  his  theme  and  working  out  its  incidents 
in  elaborate  detail — rich  in  colour  and  glowing  in  tone. 
He  works  both  for  large  effects  and  deep  impressions. 
Sometimes  it  is  claimed  that  this  artistic  method  can 
cover  almost  the  whole  range  of  instruction  ;  but  most 
naturally  it  finds  in  history,  nature,  morality  and  religion 
its  own  chosen  field. 

It  must  readily  be  granted  that  the  Impressionist 
teacher  has  built  up  his  theory,  which  has  been  put  here 
in  its  extremer  form,  upon  the  sohd  basis  of  psychology 
and  experience.  We  all  love  a  good  story,  and  it  is  one 
of  the  most  effective  instruments  known  to  us  for  gripping 
the  interest  and  so  directing  the  will.  To  acquire  the  art 
of  story-telling,  therefore,  must  always  be  one  of  the 
main  tasks  of  the  teacher.  We  shall  see  also  that  the 
material  of  the  New  Testament  is  of  such  a  character  as 
not  only  to  be  susceptible  to  this  method  of  treatment, 
but  even  to  demand  story-telhng  for  the  effective  trans- 
mission of  a  great  deal  of  it. 

There  is  no  doubt,  also,  that  for  the  ages  of  wonder 
2 


i8    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

and  imagination  in  infancy  and  early  childhood  there  is 
no  substitute  at  all  for  the  well-told  story. 

Its  danger,  however,  is  that  it  may  very  easily  defeat 
its  own  purpose.  The  attention  is  apt  to  be  attracted 
by  so  many  vivid  details,  and  the  interest  gripped  by  so 
many  strong  and  concrete  images,  that  it  requires  a  very 
sure  artistic  touch  to  preserve  the  unity  of  the  impression. 
Except  on  the  very  highest  levels  of  story-telling,  some 
element  other  than  the  sheer  artistic  desire  to  tell  a  story 
well  and  fully  seems  necessary  in  order  to  make  the  story 
into  an  effective  method  of  teaching. 

The  Method  of  Systematic  Presentation 

It  is  the  endeavour  to  provide  that  element  in  a 
scientific  way  that  justifies  and  marks  what  we  have 
called  the  Constructive  School  of  Method.  It  also  may 
make  an  extensive  use  of  story-telling,  but  the  story  as 
such  does  not  really  represent  the  genius  of  this  method, 
which  is  mainly  associated  with  Herbart  and  his  disciples. 
Its  essential  feature  is  the  attempt  to  influence  the  will 
by  setting  in  motion  the  process  of  apperception  in  the 
mind,  thus  creating  a  new  circle  of  thought  with  which 
and  in  which  Interest  is  inextricably  bound  up.  It  is 
the  Interest  thus  created  that  is  supposed  to  control  the 
will.  Herbart  himself  analysed  the  way  in  which  the  mind 
thus  goes  to  work  into  the  four  formal  steps  of  clearness, 
association,  system  and  method.  This  analysis  has  since 
been  modified  and  amplified  by  his  followers  into  the 
'  five  formal  steps  '  of  Preparation  (with  a  Statement  of 
the  Aim  as  a  sub-step),  Presentation,  Comparison,  General- 
ization and  Application.  According  to  the  theory,  it  is 
the  business  of  the  teacher  to  see  that  the  mind  passes 
through  these  steps,  and  for  the  devout  Herbartian  it  is 
pretty  certain  that  the  only  way  to  secure  this  result  is 
to  '  build  up  '  the  material  of  instruction  itself  on  these 
lines.  The  teacher  is  therefore  essentially  a  builder,  first 
of  all  of  his  material  and  through  that  of  the  mind.  All 
this  was  applied  by  Herbart  himself  only  to  large  masses 
of  material  and  groups  of  lessons,  but  it  is  now  very 
generally  applied  to  the  construction  of  single  lessons — 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION     19 

with  more  artificiality  and  less  effect.  It  is  an  interesting 
experiment  to  group  the  whole  material  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment in  accordance  with  the  Herbartian  formulae. 

The  merits  of  this  method  are  very  evident,  and  its 
influence  upon  moral  and  religious  instruction  has  been  a 
very  healthy  one.  It  keeps  before  us  the  ideal  of  moulding 
the  material  of  instruction  into  one  organic  whole.  It 
does  not  allow  the  teacher  to  run  away  from  his  task  for  a 
single  moment.  It  emphasizes  the  importance  and  char- 
acter of  the  material  itself  and  implies  a  thorough  mastery 
of  its  content  and  form  in  detail.  It  binds  the  teacher 
to  a  constant  contact  with  the  actual  psychological  process, 
which  must  be  set  in  motion  by  his  presentation  of  the 
material.  In  the  main,  the  formal  steps  represent  a  natural 
and  fairly  accurate  analysis  of  that  process. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  defects  and  dangers  of  the  con- 
structive method  must  not  be  overlooked.  The  relation 
between  the  process  of  apperception  and  the  decision  of 
the  will  is  not  always  what  the  method  implies.  The 
possession  of  a  *  circle  of  thought  '  is  no  guarantee  of  the 
moral  activity  that  corresponds  with  it.  The  whole  pro- 
cess from  beginning  to  end  is  defined  far  too  exclusively  in 
intellectual  terms  and  far  too  much  as  the  mechanical 
working  of  a  machine  which  only  requires  the  touch  of 
a  knob  to  set  it  going.  Neither  is  it  quite  certain  that  the 
best  way  to  set  it  going  is  always  to  imitate  the  formal 
steps  involved  in  the  process  itself.  The  working  of  the 
human  mind  cannot  be  quite  so  logical  and  perform  such 
clean-cuts  as  the  formal  steps  imply.  The  application  of 
the  same  rigid  procedure  to  the  construction  of  each  lesson 
in  an  endless  series  must  often  involve  an  artificial  stick- 
ing-on  of  labels  to  material  that  does  not  naturally  conform 
to  type. 

This  constructive  method,  therefore,  with  all  its  merits 
and  attractions,  cannot  legitimately  make  any  exclusive 
claims  upon  the  teacher.  It  is  an  excellent  servant,  but 
may  become  a  bad  master.  What  is  probable  is  that, 
modified  and  qualified  by  a  more  thorough  and  less 
mechanical  psychology,  it  is  the  most  helpful  method 
yet  found  for  the  teaching  of  late  childhood  and  early 
adolescence  especially. 


20    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  Method  of  Questioning 

The  third  or  the  argumentative  method  represents  a 
still  more  direct  appeal  to  the  intellect  and  a  still  greater 
dependence  upon  the  intellect  for  the  direction  of  the  will. 
It  represents  the  old  and  familiar  question-and-answer 
method  which  has  been  stereotyped  in  the  Church  Cate- 
chism. It  is  a  variation  of  the  method  of  teaching 
associated  with  the  name  of  Socrates.  In  spite  or  perhaps 
because  of  its  familiarity,  this  method  of  instruction  has 
not  received  from  modern  educators  the  scientific  attention 
it  ought.  Essentially  it  is  an  attempt  logically  to  deduce 
principles  from  facts,  or  to  apply  principles  to  new  facts 
by  a  series  of  well-framed  questions,  inviting  the  pupils 
themselves  to  carry  through  the  whole  process  by  their 
answers. 

Here  the  teacher  is  an  explorer  and  guide  rather  than 
a  builder  or  an  artist.  He  attempts  to  make  the  pupil 
feel  that  it  is  he  himself  who  is  doing  the  work.  The 
teacher  is  only  giving  him  an  opportunity,  as  it  were,  to 
discover  the  truth  for  himself.  We  have  here  once  again 
one  of  the  main  elements  of  instruction,  the  efficiency  of 
which  depends  upon  the  development  of  the  art  of  skilful 
questioning.  The  whole  method  taken  by  itself  implies, 
of  course,  a  great  deal  of  faith  in  the  logical  power  of  the 
youthful  mind,  and  it  is  very  difficult  to  conceive  any  very 
extensive  use  of  it  by  itself  as  an  independent  method  of 
instruction.  It  is  probable,  however,  that  teachers  have 
been  too  prone  to  underestimate  the  intellectual  and 
logical  capacities  of  late  childhood  and  early  adolescence, 
and  the  revival  of  a  method  of  this  kind  in  a  more  scientific 
form  may  yet  lead  to  very  fruitful  results.  The  tradi- 
tional disconnected  and  haphazard  questioning  is,  of  course, 
only  an  abuse.  It  is  true  that  the  preparation  for  giving 
instruction  by  this  method  cannot  be  so  rigid  and  elaborate 
in  detail  as  in  the  case  of  story-telling.  The  material  must 
be  under  control  in  a  somewhat  elastic  form,  for  the 
answers  to  questions  cannot  always  be  anticipated.  That, 
however,  only  means  that  the  preparation  must  be  all  the 
more  thorough,  while  the  demand  upon  the  alertness  of  the 
teacher  at  the  moment  is  far  greater. 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION     21 

Here,  again,  the  truth  seems  to  be  that  a  method  of  this 
kind  is  specially  adapted  for  the  teaching  of  middle  and 
late  adolescence,  and  only  in  a  subordinate  place  for  the 
instruction  of  childhood. 

These  seem  to  be  the  chief  types  of  methods  at  the 
disposal  of  the  teacher  of  the  New  Testament.  He  will 
do  well  not  to  pin  his  faith  to  any  one  of  them,  and  refuse 
to  bow  to  any  exclusive  claims  made  on  their  behalf. 
They  will  help  to  convince  him  that  he  must  learn  the  art 
of  effective  story-telling,  the  art  of  clear,  systematic  and 
unified  presentation  of  his  material,  and  the  art  of  skilful 
questioning. 

Need  of  Variety  in  Method 

Starting  from  the  value  of  these,  he  will  probably  find 
that  his  main  stand-by  for  infancy  and  early  childhood 
will  be  story-telling  in  all  its  forms  ;  presentation  on  more 
or  less  Herbartian  lines  for  late  childhood  and  early 
adolescence  ;  and  questioning  for  the  later  periods.  His 
experience  will  also  probably  show  him  that  his  choice 
of  any  one  of  these  methods  or  any  combination  of  them 
will  come  to  depend  upon  the  character  of  the  material 
with  which  he  happens  to  be  dealing.  Individual  incidents, 
personal  history,  biographical  records  and  imaginative 
material  will  naturally  take  the  form  of  stories.  Studies 
in  character  and  personality,  the  record  of  social  groups, 
the  transmission  of  moral  experience  and  the  intellectual 
content  of  life  will  require  the  aid  of  the  Herbartian  or 
some  similar  systematic  positive  presentation  ;  while  the 
discovery  and  formulation  of  general  principles  and  their 
application  will  require  the  more  argumentative  method. 
This,  however,  is  only  a  very  rough  division  of  his  material, 
and  the  teacher  must  be  ready  to  adopt  very  varied  com- 
binations of  methods  at  all  stages,  according  to  the  call  of 
his  subject-matter  and  the  particular  capacities  of  his 
pupils. 

In  the  end,  what  is  to  be  hoped  for  is  that  the  teacher 
will  discover  for  himself  just  that  particular  variety  of  any 
one  or  all  of  these  methods  as  his  very  own  and  learn  to 
depend  upon  it  as  his  mainstay. 


22    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Such,  then,  as  regards  general  principles  and  methods, 
is  the  educational  situation  into  which  must  be  inserted 
the  task  of  teaching  the  New  Testament  in  the  modern 
world.  It  is  a  privilege  to  enter  into  the  rich  heritage  it 
represents  and  to  make  faithful  answer  to  its  urgent 
demands.  It  is  very  humiliating  to  realize  how  in- 
effective so  far  has  been  the  response  of  the  Christian 
Church  as  a  whole.  As  an  educational  institution,  no 
one  will  venture  to  claim  that  it  is  at  present  doing  its 
work  in  any  satisfactory  way.  Whether  its  educational 
purpose  be  considered  as  giving  a  knowledge  of  the  Bible, 
or  obtaining  converts,  or  transmitting  a  knowledge  of  what 
Christianity  means,  or  producing  strong  Christian  men 
and  women  ;  whether  we  consider  the  education  it  pro- 
vides, the  instruction  it  imparts  or  the  methods  it  adopts  ; 
whether  we  consider  its  buildings,  its  equipment  or  its 
staffing — unfortunately  there  is  no  one  who  will  or  can 
claim  anything  like  efficiency  for  its  work.  The  whole 
organized  education  of  the  Church  lacks  life — newness  of 
life,  driving  power,  the  power  of  the  Spirit  that  maketh 
all  things  new.  And  it  can  find  what  it  lacks  only  in  one 
way — in  a  baptism,  and  that  a  baptism  by  total  im- 
mersion into  the  overflowing  spirit  of  its  own  Gospel 
first,  and  then  into  the  purest  ideals  and  principles  of 
modern  education.  We  must  somehow  win  the  faith  that 
by  the  grace  of  God  we  have  been  entrusted  with  a  large 
measure  of  real  power  deliberately  to  mould  human  souls, 
and  that  God  is  leading  us  more  and  more  to  discover  how 
to  do  it  effectively. 

Such  is  essentially  the  religious  faith  of  modern 
education.  We  must  see  that  it  is  also  the  educational 
faith  of  the  Christian  Church. 


BOOKS 

Adams  (J.). — Modern  Developments  in  Educational  Practice.     (London, 

1922.) 
Bagley  (W.  C). — The  Educative  Process.     (London  and  New  York, 

1915-) 
Bryant  (Sophie)  — Moral  and  Religious  Education.     (London,  1920.) 
Campagnac   (E.   T.). — Elements  of  Religion  and  Religious   Teaching 

(Cambridge,|  1 9 1 8 . ) 


CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  MODERN  EDUCATION    23 

CoE  (G.  A.)- — Education  in  Religion  and  Morals.  (New  York,  1904.) 
A  Social  Theory  of  Religious  Education.     (New  York,  1919.) 

Davidson  (J.). — Means  and  Methods  in  the  Religious  Education  of  the 
Young.     (London,  1917.) 

Dewey  (J.). — Moral  Principles  in  Education.  (Boston,  1910).  How 
We  Think.     (Boston,  19 10.) 

Gould  (F.  J.). — Moral  Instruction,  its  Theory  and  Practice.     (London, 

1913-) 
Hall  (Stanley). — Educational  Problems.     (New  York,  191 1.) 
Hayward  (F.  H.). — The  Meaning  of  Education.     (London,  1907.) 
Kirk  (K.  E.). — A  Study  of  Silent  Minds.     (London,  191 8.) 
M'CuNN  (J.). — The  Making  of  Character.     (Cambridge,  1912.) 
Paul  (Agnes  S.). — Some  Christian  Ideals  in  the  Teaching  Profession. 

(London,  19 19.) 
Potter  (H.  C). — Principles  of  Religious  Education.     (London,  1901.) 
Raymont  (T.). — The  Principles  of  Education.     (London,  1910.) 
RiCHERT   (H.). — Handbuch  fiir  den  evangelischen   Religionsunterricht. 

(Leipzig,  191 1.) 
Rusk  (R.  R.). — The  Religious  Education  of  the  Child.     (London,  191 5.) 
Sadler  (M.  E.). — Moral  Instruction  and  Training  in  Schools.     (London, 

1908.) 
Saxby  (L  B.i). — Education  of  Behaviour.     (London,  192 1.) 
Sisson. — The  Essentials  of  Character.     (New  York,  191 5.) 
Spiller  (G.). — Papers  on  Moral  Education.     (London,  1908.) 
T.  C.  U. — Education  :  Its  Spiritual  Basis  and  Social  Ideals.     (London, 

1918.) 
Thorndike  (E.  L.). — Educational  Psychology.     (New  York,  191 3.) 
Welton  (J.). — What  do  we  mean  by  Education  ?     (London,  1914.) 


CHAPTER  II 

THE   NEW  TESTAMENT  AND   THE   CHRISTIAN   TEACHER 

[.  The  Study  of  the  New  Testament. — Modern  Biblical  Criticism — The 
External  Characteristics  of  the  New  Testament — Its  Contents — 
Different  Levels  of  Thought — The  Peculiar  Contribution  of  the 
New  Testament — Summary. 

2.  The  Need  of  Trained  Teachers. — The  Training  of  Teachers — Their 

Need  of  a  Critical  Study  of  the  Bible. 

3.  The     Teacher's    Attitude. — Two     Questions    Involved — The    Moral 

Demand — Need  of  a  Consistent  Attitude — Mediaeval  v.  Modern 
Methods — The  Attitude  of  the  Great  Preachers — The  Needs  of 
the  Ordinary  Teacher — The  Parting  of  the  Ways. 


THE  STUDY  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT 

A  BAPTISM  into  the  best  spirit  and  principles  of  the  great 
modern  educators  is  capable  of  pouring  new  life  into  the 
moribund  body  of  the  moral  and  religious  education  of 
the  Church,  and,  as  we  have  seen,  it  is  in  an  indirect  way 
a  baptism  into  the  spirit  and  principles  of  the  Christian 
Gospel.  Naturally,  however,  we  shall  find  a  far  more 
direct  way  into  the  heart  of  the  same  Gospel  in  every 
fresh  literary,  historical  and  religious  study  of  the  New 
Testament. 

Modern  Biblical  Criticism 

This  is  not  the  place  to  enter  upon  the  history  of  the 
interpretation  of  the  New  Testament  during  the  second 
half  of  the  last  century — ^from  the  days  of  Strauss  and 
Baur  through  Westcott,  Hort  and  Lightfoot,  down  to  the 
days  of  Sanday,  Harnack,  JiiUcher,  Bousset  and  Johannes 
Weiss.  As  a  whole,  it  is  probably  the  history  of  one  of 
the  most  thorough  intellectual  processes  in  the  story  of 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER    25 

the  race.  Every  book,  every  chapter,  every  phrase  and 
every  word  in  the  New  Testament  have  been  under  the 
critical  microscope  many  times  from  almost  every  point 
of  view.  The  work  has  been  done  with  almost  absolute 
freedom,  running  sometimes  into  licence  and  sometimes 
into  the  most  utter  disregard  for  the  practical  results, 
good  or  bad,  which  might  follow  for  Christianity  and 
the  Church.  All  the  more  significant,  therefore,  is  the 
undoubted  fact  that  what  is  practically  a  consensus  of 
scholarly  opinion  has  now  been  reached  with  regard  to 
the  origin,  nature  and  history  of  the  books  of  the  New 
Testament.  So  far,  at  any  rate,  as  the  teacher  or  the 
preacher  is  concerned,  the  differences  between  scholars 
are  not  of  much  account.  The  conception  of  the  New 
Testament  is  now  clear  in  all  its  main  outlines  and  in 
most  of  its  details.  To  this,  the  Christian  teacher  must 
adjust  himself  and  his  work,  sooner  or  later,  and  the 
sooner  the  better. 

We  cannot  hide  from  ourselves  the  fact  that  it  is  a 
New  Testament  very  different  from  that  which  was  in 
the  hands  of  the  teacher  a  century  ago.  Of  the  tradi- 
tional theory  or  dogma  about  the  Bible  not  a  fragment 
has  been  left  standing.  An  entirely  new  building  stands 
on  the  site  and  in  the  place  of  the  old,  though  it  is  true 
that  many  stones  from  the  old  house  have  been  used  in 
the  reconstruction.  It  is  especially  necessary  for  the 
teacher  at  this  point  to  be  quite  clear  as  to  what  that  really 
means. 

In  its  logical  and  extreme  form,  the  traditional  idea 
of  the  Bible  was  that  of  a  miraculous,  absolute,  objective 
and  consistent  Revelation  throughout,  given  directly  by 
God  in  a  supernatural  way,  written  at  His  dictation  and 
preserved  by  supernatural  means. 

In  and  for  itself  it  was  God's  final  word  for  all  time. 
In  form,  origin  and  history  it  was  taken  to  be  so. 
From  beginning  to  end  it  was  a  complete  and  consistent 
system  of  divine  truth.  This  was  the  dogma  of  the  Bible 
in  its  logical  form.  Every  word  was  equally  infallible 
and  equally  authoritative.  Every  word  meant  something 
important  in  a  religious  and  Christian  sense. 

Of  course,  no  one  did — no  one  ever  could — carry  out 


26    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

such  a  theory  consistently  into  practice.  We  must  not, 
however,  forget  that  so  long  as  it  was  consciously  or  sub- 
consciously accepted  by  the  teacher  and  his  pupils,  it  did 
supply  in  a  marvellous  way  their  greatest  needs  for 
authority  and  for  a  final  court  of  appeal.  It  was,  however, 
a  theory  that  might  be  shattered  in  a  moment  by  any  one 
who  dared  to  employ  his  critical  judgment  upon  it.  That 
was  what  naturally  did  happen  in  course  of  time.  The 
New  Testament  as  well  as  the  Old  was,  after  a  long  struggle, 
claimed  as  a  proper  subject  for  the  same  kind  of  study  as 
was  given  to  other  literature  and  by  the  same  methods. 
The  consequences  of  this  critical  study  we  must  be  pre- 
pared to  accept  frankly  for  the  sake  of  teaching  the  New 
Testament  effectively.  It  is,  however,  not  the  individual 
results  in  detail  that  concern  us  here  so  much  as  the  final 
effect  upon  our  general  view  of  the  New  Testament  as 
a  whole  in  its  origin,  character  and  form.  What,  then,  is 
the  New  Testament  as  we  have  it  in  our  hands  to-day  ? 

The  External  Characteristics   of   the   New 
Testament 

I .  With  regard  to  its  external  characteristics  : 
(a)  The  New  Testament  is  a  collection  of  early 
Christian  writings,  miscellaneous  in  form,  including 
collections  of  biographical  anecdotes  of  the  Christian 
leaders,  private  letters,  semi-formal  epistles  and  several 
other  types  of  literature  common  in  their  time.  They 
were  written  by  Christians  to  one  another  and  some 
perhaps  to  outsiders  on  matters  relating  to  the  new 
religion. 

{b)  The  New  Testament,  however,  is  not  merely  a 
haphazard  collection,  but  a  selection  from  a  larger  mass  of 
Christian  writings,  belonging  approximately  to  the  first 
century  after  the  death  of  Jesus  Christ.  This  selection 
was  not  deliberately  made  on  one  principle.  The  New 
Testament  writings  are  not  all  earlier  than  other  Christian 
writings.  They  are  not  different  in  their  form.  They 
are  not  all  apostolic  in  their  origin.  Their  selection  was 
not  one  deliberate  act,  but  the  result  of  a  long  process 
carried  on   by  different  Churches  in  different  places  and 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER    27 

from  diflferent  motives.  The  New  Testament  came  into 
being  by  a  process  of  natural  selection  and  survival,  and  it 
was  only  the  last  step,  and  that  a  formal  one,  which  was 
taken  by  the  Church  Councils. 

(c)  So  far  as  all  external  characteristics  are  concerned, 
no  difference  can  be  traced  between  the  writings  of  the  New 
Testament  and  those  of  their  time  and  age  outside.  In 
language,  origin,  literary  forms,  history  and  preservation 
they  underwent  the  same  fortunes  and  misfortunes  as 
the  other  books  which  have  come  down  to  us — until  they 
were  definitely  elevated  into  the  Sacred  Canon  of  the 
Church. 

Externally,  therefore,  we  have  before  us  a  natural, 
human,  historical  and  literary  growth.  The  books  are 
human  products  which  scholars  have  succeeded  in  putting 
back  into  their  setting  in  the  literature,  history,  thought 
and  language  of  the  first  two  centuries. 

Whether  and  how  far  what  the  early  Christians  had 
to  say  to  one  another  in  and  through  these  writings  is  a 
Word  or  the  Word  of  God  to  us  is  a  matter  upon  which 
literary  and  historical  study  as  such  can  pass  no  direct 
judgment.  It  is  not  within  its  province  to  do  so.  To 
call  the  New  Testament  inspired  or  revealed  can  only 
be  a  judgment  upon  the  value  of  its  content,  and  it  is 
independent  of  its  form  and  the  process  through  which 
it  came.  Whatever  special  moral  or  religious  value  there 
may  be  in  the  New  Testament  writings,  it  is  clear  that 
that  value  is  not  derived  from  and  cannot  depend  upon 
either  their  literary  origin  or  their  history,  upon  their 
external  characteristics  or  the  method  of  their  preserva- 
tion and  collection — but  only  upon  the  character  of  their 
contents,  the  life  from  which  they  sprang  and  the  effects 
they  produce. 

2.  We  are  therefore  driven  back  more  definitely  than 
ever  before  upon  the  character  of  the  contents  of  the 
New  Testament. 

{a)  Although  no  hard  and  fast  distinction  can  any 
longer  be  drawn  externally  between  early  Christian  writings 
inside  and  outside  the  Canon,  yet  the  choice  of  the  books 
which  we  have  now  in  the  New  Testament  has  been  fully 
justified  on  the  merits  of  their  contents. 


28    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

They  are  the  documents  which  are  most  typical  of 
the  early  Christian  movement  itself,  and  which  are  of  most 
importance  in  estimating  the  character  and  value  of  that 
movement.  It  is  true  that  Luther  called  the  Epistle  of 
James  "  an  epistle  of  straw,  for  there  is  nothing  evangelical 
in  it,"  but  that  was  a  very  hasty  judgment  on  his  part. 
It  might  also  be  argued  that  the  Epistle  of  Barnabas, 
the  first  Epistle  of  Clement  and  the  Letters  of  Ignatius 
ought  to  have  been  included,  but  it  would  tax  the  ingenuity 
of  the  critic  to  decide  whether  they  are  superior  or  equal 
in  value  to  any  New  Testament  writings.  It  must  also 
be  confessed  that  the  boundary  between  the  canonical 
and  the  extra-canonical  books  nearest  to  them  was  for 
long  very  uncertain. 

The  Contents  of  the  New  Testament 

In  spite  of  all  this,  however,  the  right  of  the  New 
Testament  to  represent  the  meaning  of  Early  Christianity 
still  stands  firm.  While  the  reasons  given  originally  in 
each  case  for  placing  individual  books  inside  or  outside 
the  Canon  cannot  always  be  endorsed,  yet  the  verdict 
of  the  Early  Church  as  to  the  supreme  value  of  the  New 
Testament  as  a  whole,  compared  with  all  the  other  writings 
of  the  time,  has  been  amply  confirmed.  We  can  therefore 
be  sure  that  when  we  are  dealing  with  these  writings 
we  are  at  the  heart  of  the  Christian  movement. 

(b)  It  has  also  been  clearly  revealed  to  us  by  this  time 
that  in  purpose  and  nature  every  part  of  the  contents  of 
the  New  Testament  is  essentially  occasional  and  practical. 
Even  the  fixing  of  the  Canon  was  not  really  the  work  of 
the  great  Councils.  It  was  the  free  choice  of  the  Christian 
Churches  to  meet  their  practical  needs  for  Christian 
edification  and  instruction.  Every  book  was  written 
with  a  definite  practical  purpose — even  the  Epistle  to 
the  Romans  and  the  Apocalypse.  Each  was  intended  to 
meet  some  concrete  situation,  and  always  sprang  out 
of  some  concrete  historical  circumstances.  Each  writer 
wished  to  bring  the  power  of  the  Christian  Gospel  to  bear 
upon  some  definite  moral  conditions.  There  is  not  a 
book  in  the  New  Testament  which  can  be  fully  or  properly 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER    29 

described  either  as  a  theoretical  treatise,  or  an  historical 
essay,  or  a  mere  literary  effort. 


Different  Levels  of  Thought  and  Life 

(c)  Scientific  modern  study  has  also  made  it  both 
necessary  and  possible  to  distinguish  great  differences  in 
the  character  and  the  value  of  the  contents  of  the  different 
books  of  the  New  Testament.  There  are  two  significant 
illustrations  of  this  fact.  In  the  first  place,  there  are 
present  throughout  the  New  Testament  two  elements 
which  can  be  separated  from  each  other.  There  are 
features  which  belong  to  the  age  in  general,  something 
which  the  New  Testament  has  in  common  with  the  non- 
Christian — Jewish,  Greek  or  Oriental — thought  and  life 
of  the  time.  Then  alongside  of  that  element  we  have 
the  message  which  is  peculiar  to  these  books  themselves, 
or  rather  to  the  movement  they  represent,  namely,  that 
which  is  the  peculiar  contribution  of  the  Founder,  and  of 
the  teachers  and  preachers  of  the  new  religion.  The 
proportion  and  the  way  in  which  these  two  elements  are 
mixed  in  the  different  books  vary  considerably,  but  in 
none  is  either  element  entirely  absent.  Sometimes  the 
peculiar  Christian  element  is  the  predominant  factor  and 
the  form  only,  or  the  expression  only  belongs  to  the  age 
in  general  ;  but  sometimes  the  Jewish  or  Greek  thought 
is  only  given  a  kind  of  Christian  twist. 

The  relation  between  these  two  elements  may  be  ex- 
pressed in  different  ways.  They  have  been  called  the 
kernel  and  the  husk,  the  permanent  and  the  passing, 
the  spirit  and  the  form,  the  Gospel  and  its  historical 
expressions.  A  great  deal  of  the  teaching  of  the  New 
Testament  must  always  be  concerned  with  distinguishing 
between  these  two. 

In  the  second  place,  we  have  learnt  to  recognize  many 
different  levels  of  thought  and  life  in  the  New  Testament. 
Of  these,  three  at  least  can  be  described  with  some  fulness 
and  represent  fundamental  types  of  early  Christian  thought 
and  life,  namely,  the  Synoptic,  the  Pauline  and  the 
Johannine.  It  will  naturally  be  one  of  the  main  tasks  of 
the  Christian  teacher  to  distinguish,  compare  and  estimate 


30    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

the  value  of  these  different  forms  of  Christian  Hfe  and 
thought. 

The  Peculiar  Contribution  of  the  New  Testament 

{d)  By  all  these  means  what  is  the  most  original 
contribution  made  by  the  Christian  movement  to  the  life 
and  thought  of  the  world  has  been  brought  clearly  into 
prominence.  This  peculiarly  Christian  contribution  as 
revealed  in  the  New  Testament  is  found  neither  in  the 
books  themselves  as  books  nor  even  in  doctrines  and  ideas,- 
but  in  the  personalities  whom  they  reveal — in  the  personal 
life  and  the  practical  attitude  towards  life  and  the  world 
which  they  express,  the  deep  moral  and  religious  experience 
which  created  the  books  and  the  ideas.  More  especially, 
it  has  been  shown  that  the  comparative  value  of  the  books 
and  their  ideas  depends  upon  the  relation  in  which  they 
stand  to  the  one  Personality  which  dominates  them  all 
to  a  greater  or  less  extent — that  of  Jesus  of  Nazareth. 

{e)  Finally,  it  is  important  for  the  teacher  to  note  that 
in  establishing  all  these  facts  about  the  New  Testament, 
modern  study  has  also  succeeded  in  revealing  to  us  a  great 
deal  of  the  whole  concrete  world  from  and  into  which  the 
Christian  Religion  and  the  New  Testament  itself  came, 
the  world  in  which  the  Christian  Gospel  had  to  dwell,  with 
which  it  became  united  in  detail  and  whose  problems  it 
set  out  to  solve.  They  are  the  Jewish,  the  Oriental,  the 
Greek  and  the  Roman  world  of  the  time — in  language, 
thought,  morality,  religion,  politics  and  social  conditions. 
Into  this  world,  the  Gospel,  the  Christian  ideal  and  power 
were  thrown  '  like  ferment  into  the  pot.*  The  result  is 
that  what  we  have  in  the  New  Testament  is  the  Gospel, 
not  in  the  abstract  or  as  a  set  of  theoretical  principles, 
but  in  a  multitude  of  concrete  forms  and  concrete  relations. 
So  far  as  the  New  Testament  is  concerned,  the  Gospel  has 
no  reality  except  as  it  takes  shape  in  definite  historical 
circumstances,  men  and  societies. 

Summary 

To  put  it  briefly,  then,  the  New  Testament  is  a  collection 
of  and  a  selection  from  early  Christian  writings,  differing 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER    31 

in  nothing  so  far  as  all  external  characteristics  are  con- 
cerned from  the  other  writings  of  the  same  age.  Repre- 
senting as  they  do  a  natural  human  growth,  they  are 
nevertheless  the  most  characteristic  literary  products  of 
the  early  Christian  movement.  Among  themselves,  the 
books  differ  in  their  literary  form,  purpose  and  value,  but 
in  them  all  we  can  distinguish  the  peculiar  contribution  of 
the  new  religion  to  the  world — its  Gospel,  which  is  found 
pre-eminently  in  the  personality  of  Jesus  of  Nazareth. 
The  New  Testament,  however,  gives  us  this  Gospel  in  the 
mould  of  a  definite  age  in  many  different  forms  to  meet 
the  various  conditions  of  the  time.  For  that  reason,  the 
study  of  the  New  Testament  is  being  gradually  transformed 
into  a  study  of  Primitive  Christian  Life,  History  and 
Personality,  producing  and  expressing  itself  in  thought, 
literature  and  action. 

It  is  these  general  facts,  with  regard  to  the  nature  of 
the  New  Testament  as  a  whole,  that  are  by  far  the  most 
important  for  the  modern  Christian  teacher.  The  further 
results  of  critical  study  in  detail,  with  regard  to  questions 
of  date,  authorship  and  the  historical  accuracy  of  the 
several  books,  are  not  so  important,  and  any  attempt  to 
describe  these  results  would  take  us  at  present  too  far 
afield.  The  essential  point  with  regard  to  them  all  is  that 
the  decision  of  each  question  must  be  obtained  in  the  same 
way  as  all  other  similar  questions  are  decided,  and  that  is 
simply  on  the  evidence  available. 

It  is  seldom,  however,  that  they  are  of  any  importance 
to  the  teacher  as  such.  His  great  gain  with  regard  to  them 
is  that  he  is  placed  in  a  much  freer  position  on  these 
matters.  He  reaches  a  point  of  view  which  makes  him 
more  or  less  independent  of  them,  for  he  cannot  any 
longer  trade  in  the  form  of  the  books  so  much  as  in  their 
content — not  so  much  in  the  written  word  itself  as  in  what 
is  behind  it— the  experience,  the  life  and  the  personalities 
revealed  in  and  through  the  written  word.  It  is  only  in 
so  far  as  the  critical  discussions  touch  the  life  and  per- 
sonalities in  the  New  Testament  that  they  affect  the 
teacher's  work  to  any  extent. 

Such  is  the  case,  for  instance,  in  the  controversy  with 
regard  to  the  nature  and  historical  character  of  the  Fourth 


32    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Gospel.  The  different  views  on  this  question  must  lead 
to  considerable  differences  in  the  treatment  and  use  of  the 
Fourth  Gospel,  and  may  change  the  whole  historical  picture 
of  Jesus  Christ.  This,  therefore,  will  need  special  discus- 
sion later  on,  along  with  some  other  questions  of  detail 
which  affect  the  teaching  of  particular  aspects  of  the  New 
Testament. 


THE  NEED  OF  TRAINED  TEACHERS 

It  goes  without  saying  that  this  general  picture  of  the 
history  and  contents  of  the  New  Testament  must  condition 
the  practical  use  made  of  its  literature  and  history  in  all 
directions. 

Any  intrinsic  authority  which  the  New  Testament  may 
have  on  account  of  its  contents  is  not  thereby  materially 
affected.  Nor  is  our  duty  to  make  a  knowledge  of  the  New 
Testament  an  essential  element  in  the  general  education  of 
all  who  share  in  the  civilization  of  Europe  any  the  less 
imperative.  For  nothing  can  alter  the  fact  that  the  New 
Testament  has  been  one  of  the  most  potent  factors  in  the 
growth  of  Europe. 

The  Training  of  Teachers 

There  are,  however,  some  considerations  arising  from 
the  circumstances  of  our  time,  the  controversies  which 
have  till  recently  been  raging  with  regard  to  questions  of 
Biblical  Criticism,  the  hold  which  more  or  less  traditional 
views  still  have  upon  the  older  generation  and  the  frag- 
mentary way  in  which  critical  results  have  been  spread 
by  newspapers — all  these  considerations  seem  to  demand 
a  somewhat  fuller  discussion  of  the  value  and  the  practical 
effect  of  the  modern  study  of  the  Bible  upon  moral  and 
religious  instruction.  It  ought  not  to  be  necessary  to 
remind  those  who  are  responsible  for  the  training  of 
teachers  that  the  first  condition  of  any  effective  teaching 
of  the  Bible  (in  the  schools  of  the  State  no  less  than  in  the 
schools  of  the  Church)  is  some  sound  scientific  knowledge 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER    33 

of  the  Bible  itself  in  its  history,  form  and  contents.  Yet 
the  amazing  fact  is  that  at  least  half  the  children  of  the 
United  Kingdom  (and  probably  a  much  greater  pro- 
portion) are  constantly  receiving  moral  and  Biblical  in- 
struction from  teachers  who  have  had  no  scientific  or 
any  other  definite  training  for  their  task.  So  far  as  the 
Elementary  Schools  are  concerned,  it  is  only  in  the  de- 
nominational Training  Colleges  that  any  pretence  is  being 
made  to  prepare  the  teachers  for  the  work  of  teaching  the 
Bible,  to  which  at  least  half  an  hour  daily  will  be  devoted 
throughout  their  career.  Even  their  training  is  more  often 
than  not  a  very  meagre  and  unscientific  one.  Most  other 
Training  Colleges  seem  quite  content  to  live  by  the  hope 
that  the  teachers  they  turn  out  will  somehow  '  muddle 
through  '  this  part  of  their  w^ork  in  some  miraculous  way 
which  they  do  not  dream  of  trusting  in  the  case  of  any 
other  subject  in  the  overcrowded  time-table  of  Elemen- 
tary Schools.  The  situation  in  the  Secondary  Schools  is 
still  more  scandalous.  On  the  other  side,  the  Education 
Authorities  with  one  accord  take  it  for  granted  that  their 
task  is  nobly  done  when  they  have  issued  confused  injunc- 
tions that  morality  and  the  Bible  must  be  taught  in  their 
schools,  and  have  published  a  still  more  confused  and 
unintelligent  syllabus,  according  to  which  they  are  to  be 
taught.  They  never  dream  of  asking  whether  some 
knowledge  of  Ethics  and  the  Bible  are  included  by  any 
happy  chance  in  the  long  list  of  the  qualifications  of  the 
teachers  they  appoint. 

The  so-called  '  secular  '  authorities  may,  of  course, 
legitimately  retort  that  they  are  only  following  the 
example  of  the  Church.  This  is  unfortunately  but  too 
true,  for  Sunday-school  teachers  are  even  worse  off  in 
this  respect  than  the  teachers  in  State  Schools.  So  far 
as  Nonconformity  at  least  is  concerned,  the  one  excep- 
tion is  the  West  Hill  Training  School,  and  that  is  more  or 
less  of  a  private  venture,  due  to  the  enthusiasm  of  Mr. 
G.  H.  Archibald.  Of  course  the  result  of  all  this  insist- 
ence upon  teaching  morahty  and  the  Bible,  coupled  with 
the  absolute  neglect  of  providing  any  definite  training  for 
it,  is  that  the  teaching  in  the  majority  of  cases  is  worse 
than  useless,  and  that  the  most  unintelligent  views  of  the 
3 


34    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Bible  are  still  spread  broadcast,  and  the  most  irreverent 
attitude  towards  the  Bible  is  assiduously  cultivated. 


The  Critical  Study  of  the  Bible 

So  far  we  have  been  pleading  only  for  some  systematic 
knowledge  of  the  Bible  as  the  first  condition  of  teaching  it. 
We  must  realize,  however,  that  in  our  day  this  systematic 
knowledge  cannot  be  given  or  obtained  except  under  the 
guidance  of  modern  Biblical  scholars  who  have  made  the 
Bible  into  a  new  book  for  the  teacher  as  for  all  men.  One 
of  the  most  curious  things  in  the  history  of  most  of  the 
movements  for  the  reform  of  the  Sunday  School  is  the 
hesitation  and  extreme  diffidence  with  which  this  whole 
subject  of  the  need  for  Biblical  Criticism  in  the  work  of 
Biblical  instruction  is  approached.  An  intense  eagerness 
is  often  displayed  for  the  adoption  of  up-to-date  educa- 
tional methods,  but  there  is  generally  a  good  deal  of  cir- 
cumlocution employed  whenever  it  becomes  a  question 
of  what,  after  all,  we  are  supposed  to  teach  through  these 
modern  methods.  Many  people  seem  to  be  under  the 
impression  that  every  child  is  born  with  certain  traditional 
views  of  the  Bible  stereotyped  upon  his  soul,  and  that 
therefore  it  is  a  very  difficult  and  dangerous  business 
to  teach  him  what  the  Bible  really  means.  As  a  matter 
of  fact,  of  course,  the  truth  is  that  in  the  majority  of  cases 
the  parents  and  teachers  have  a  perfectly  free  hand  in  this 
matter.  If  the  child  of  twelve  has  acquired  wrong  views 
of  the  Bible,  which  must  be  corrected  later  on,  it  is  gener- 
ally because  the  home  or  the  school  has  taken  a  good 
deal  of  trouble  to  drill  those  wrong  views  into  him.  With 
far  less  trouble  he  might  have  been  helped  from  the  start 
to  grow  unconsciously  into  the  proper  attitude  towards 
the  Scriptures.  It  is  not  a  question  of  changing  the  views 
of  the  child  but  of  changing  the  views  of  the  teacher,  and 
of  so  teaching  the  Bible  from  the  start  that  the  child 
may  be  saved  from  the  wrench  of  having  to  remake  his 
faith  later  on.  We  are  now  continually  emphasizing  the 
need  of  proper  methods  for  doing  this  work,  but  we  must 
not  forget  that  the  matter  of  our  teaching  is  at  least  quite 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER     35 

as  important  a  factor.      How  we  teach  will  in  the  end 
depend  upon  what  we  want  to  teach. 

That  is  why  it  is  especially  necessary  at  the  present 
time  to  realize  that  modern  educational  methods  will  not 
and  cannot  become  the  permanent  methods  of  moral  and 
religious  education  unless  and  until  they  are  used  to 
teach  the  material  best  adapted  to  those  methods.  That 
material  in  this  case  is  the  Bible  as  it  comes  from  the 
hands  of  the  modern  scientific  scholars.  It  follows  as  an 
inevitable  consequence  for  the  teacher  that  he  must  learn 
to  adopt  the  free  attitude  of  the  literary  and  historical 
student  towards  the  material  as  well  as  the  form  of  the 
Bible.  He  has  done  for  ever  with  traditional  theories 
both  of  the  text,  form  and  matter  of  the  Biblical  narra- 
tives. He  will  deal  with  them  in  exactly  the  same  spirit 
and  fashion  as  he  must  deal  for  educational  purposes 
with  all  the  world's  best  literature — and  that  is  with 
intelligence,  freedom  and  reverence. 


3 

THE  TEACHER'S  ATTITUDE 

If  the  case  for  the  frank  adoption  of  the  modern 
literary  and  historical  methods  of  studying  the  Bible 
seems  to  need  strengthening,  there  is  no  lack  of  material 
for  that  purpose.  Both  on  moral  and  educational  grounds 
the  demand  is  urgent  and  overwhelming. 

Two  Questions  Involved 

Some  of  the  hesitation  with  regard  to  this  question 
may  be  due  to  a  lack  of  clearness  as  to  the  issues  involved. 

In  reality,  two  very  different  and  independent  prob- 
lems have  to  be  discussed.  The  first  is — how  far  should 
our  teaching  of  the  Bible  be  based  upon  and  be  guided  by 
the  methods  and  results  of  modern  criticism  ?  In  other 
words,  what  is  its  value  for  the  practical  teaching  of  the 
Bible  ?  This  deals  with  that  part  of  the  teacher's  work 
which  is,  as  it  were,  out  of  sight.     It  concerns  the  choice 


36    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

and  preparation  of  the  lessons,  the  value  of  the  Bible  as 
interpreted  by  modern  scholars  and  the  positive  picture 
to  be  given  of  its  place.  This  touches  the  pupil  only 
indirectly.  He  may  be  quite  unconscious  of  what  the 
teacher  is  doing  for  him. 

The  second  question  is  one  of  a  different  kind.  How 
far  should  the  methods  and  results  of  modern  criticism 
be  deliberately  and  definitely  taught  in  the  school  to  the 
pupil  ?  When  and  how  should  that  be  done  ?  In  other 
words,  what  is  the  educational  value  of  a  training  in 
Biblical  Criticism  itself  ?  Can  it  help,  in  any  way,  to 
promote  the  growth   of  Christian  faith  and  character  ? 

These  two  questions  must  be  kept  more  or  less  apart 
and  each  discussed  on  its  own  merits.  The  latter  we  shall 
have  to  deal  with  later  on  among  the  particular  problems 
of  teaching  the  New  Testament,  and  it  is  only  the  former 
which  concerns  us  at  present. 

The  Moral  Demand 

In  the  first  place,  the  use  we  make  of  the  Bible  should 
as  an  elementary  moral  duty  be  guided  and  controlled 
by  what  we  know  the  Bible  to  be.  If  we  know,  as  we  do, 
that  the  Book  of  Deuteronomy  was  not  written  by  Moses, 
but  belongs  to  the  seventh  century  before  Christ,  there 
can  be  no  justification  for  refusing  to  base  our  lessons  on 
what  we  know  to  be  the  truth.  The  situation  here  is  now 
perfectly  clear.  In  the  theological  lecture-room  every- 
where, the  main  results  of  modern  Biblical  Criticism  as 
represented,  say,  by  the  late  Professor  Driver  and  Sir 
George  Adam  Smith  in  the  Old  Testament,  and  by  the  late 
Professor  Sanday  or  by  Harnack  in  the  New  Testament, 
are  now  universally  adopted  and  more  or  less  thoroughly 
applied.  No  responsible  Biblical  scholar  would  now 
dream  of  attributing  the  Book  of  Genesis  to  Moses  or 
Isaiah  xl.  to  Ixvi.  to  the  prophet  of  that  name  in  the 
eighth  century  B.C.,  or  the  Gospel  of  Matthew  to  the 
Apostle,  or  2  Peter  to  the  Apostle  Peter.  He  would  not 
dream  of  trusting  to  the  historical  accuracy  of  Chronicles. 
He  would  not  hesitate  to  cut  up  the  Books  of  Samuel  into 
earlier   and   later   documents   that   sometimes    contradict 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER     37 

each  other,  and  he  would  immediately  recognize  in  almost 
all  the  prophetic  books  the  presence  of  passages  from  later 
writers.  He  takes  it  for  granted  that  Matthew  and  Luke 
are  dependent  upon  the  Gospel  of  Mark  and  a  Collection 
of  the  Sayings  of  Jesus,  and  he  would  not  think  of  re- 
cognizing the  Fourth  Gospel  without  many  qualifications 
as  an  historical  record  of  the  life  of  Jesus. 

If  we  still  go  on  teaching  on  the  basis  of  the  traditional 
views  of  the  Bible,  we  are  perpetuating  what  we  know  to 
be  false  views  and  destroying  the  truth  of  history. 

Need  of  a  Consistent  Attitude 

The  situation  is  aggravated  by  the  fact  that  for  years 
the  critical  views  have  been  filtering  down  through  the 
newspapers  in  a  fragmentary  and  negative  way  to  the 
man  in  the  street  and  the  ordinary  teacher,  with  the 
result  that  in  the  majority  of  cases  those  who  are  teaching 
the  Bible  in  thousands  of  schools  up  and  down  the  country 
have  definitely  ceased  to  believe  in  the  traditional  views 
and  to  adopt  the  traditional  attitude  towards  the  Bible, 
but  have  not  yet  attained  any  personal,  positive  and 
systematic  conceptions  in  their  place. 

In  many  cases,  therefore,  an  intolerable  burden  is 
imposed  upon  the  truthfulness  and  sincerity  of  teachers 
whose  instructions  still  imply  the  propagation  of  an 
attitude  and  of  views  which  they  no  longer  share. 

We  must  not,  of  course,  hide  from  ourselves  the  fact 
that  when  a  modern  view  of  the  Bible  is  adopted  as  the 
only  possible  background  for  all  our  teaching,  we  are 
leaving  behind  us  much  more  than  particular  views  on 
particular  points.  It  must  be  repeated  that  we  are  re- 
pudiating the  whole  idea  of  the  Bible  as  an  infallible 
supernatural,  miraculous  revelation  of  scientific,  historical 
and  religious  truth,  as  well  as  the  old  conception  of  religious 
education  and  Biblical  instruction  as  a  whole.  On  the 
old  view,  our  main  business  was  to  transmit  as  much  of 
the  material  of  the  Bible  as  time  allowed,  taking  it  for 
granted  that  it  was  all  of  equal  value.  No  other  method 
was  possible.  Every  lesson  must  consist  of  comment 
upon  a  particular  passage.     There  was  no  room  in  the 


38    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

scheme  for  lessons  on  either  the  History  of  Israel  or  the 
Religion  of  Israel  as  such,  or  upon  the  Books  of  the  Bible 
as  a  whole.  We  could  not  give  lessons  on  the  character 
of  Paul  or  the  early  History  of  Christianity  except  in  a 
very  fragmentary  and  haphazard  way.  According  to  the 
modern  conception  of  the  Bible  and  of  Education,  on  the 
other  hand,  our  business  is  to  choose  as  much  material 
from  the  Bible  as  has  educative  value  and  power,  and  to 
use  it  in  such  a  way,  at  such  a  time  and  in  such  a  form 
as  will  help  to  promote  moral  and  religious  growth. 

Modern  and  Medieval  Methods 

Between  these  two  views  there  can  be  no  real  and 
permanent  compromise,  for  what  we  have  here  is  a  quarrel 
between  two  fundamentally  different  conceptions  of  the 
meaning  and  place  of  the  Bible  as  well  as  radically  different 
conceptions  of  the  meaning  and  methods  of  education. 
In  religious  instruction,  it  is  true,  many  have  for  years 
been  trying  to  combine  modern  educational  ideas  and 
methods  with  the  traditional  views  of  the  Bible.  The 
attempt  is  utterly  hopeless,  not  only  because  the  old 
views  are  false  and  discredited,  but  also  because  they  are 
essentially  inconsistent  with  every  principle  in  modern 
education.  The  traditional  views  of  the  Bible  imply 
and  demand  the  mediaeval  methods  in  order  to  teach 
them.  On  the  other  hand,  the  principles  and  methods 
of  modern  education  can  only  be  used  to  teach  the 
corresponding  results  of  modern  study.  It  was  the  old 
idea  of  the  Bible  that  created  the  mediaeval  system  of 
education,  and  they  stand  or  fall  together. 

It  must,  therefore,  be  realized  that  what  the  public 
teacher  and  preacher  are  face  to  face  with,  is  not  a  frag- 
mentary and  occasional  acceptance  under  pressure  of 
individual  critical  results — a  mere  grafting  of  some 
critical  views  upon  an  attitude  which  is  not  organically 
united  with  them.  It  may  be  inevitable  for  the  man  in 
the  street  to  pick  up  the  results  of  modern  study  in 
snatches,  and  adopt  them  one  by  one  without  revising 
his  whole  attitude  towards  the  Bible,  and  without  realizing 
how  they  work  out  as  a  whole.     Such  a  haphazard  pro- 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER    39 

ceeding  can  only  be  disastrous  in  its  results  for  the 
Christian  teacher.  It  is  only  a  changed  general  attitude 
that  can  save  the  reality  of  Christian  teaching. 

Public  teaching  which  implies  the  outlook  of  Sir 
George  Adam  Smith  to-day,  and  that  of  Dean  Burgon 
to-morrow,  must  have  fatal  results  for  both  teacher  and 
people.  It  is,  moreover,  not  fair  to  judge  the  practical 
results  of  either  the  one  or  the  other  by  the  effect  of  what 
is  only  an  undigested  mixture  of  both.  Yet  such  is  the 
ambiguous  situation  in  the  Church,  pulpit,  Sunday  and 
Day  Schools  of  to-day.  It  is  one  of  the  practical  tasks 
of  modern  religious  education  to  see  that  the  children 
of  this  generation  grow  naturally  and  from  the  outset 
into  that  consistent,  reverent  and  enlightened  attitude 
towards  the  Bible  which  corresponds  to  the  facts  with 
regard  to  its  character  and  history  as  revealed  by  modern 
study.  It  is  a  task  which  can  never  be  adequately 
accomplished  without  some  clear  realization  of  the  essential 
change  of  attitude  involved  on  the  part  of  the  teacher. 
For  the  purposes  of  modern  systematic  education  and 
instruction,  the  Bible  becomes  more  and  more  ineffective 
unless  and  until  the  teacher  reads  and  studies  it  under 
the  guidance  of  modern  scholars.  This,  of  course,  does 
not  deny  the  tremendously  revolutionary  influence  of  a 
free  personal  reading  of  the  New  Testament  upon  character. 
It  only  confirms  it,  for  that  personal  reading,  so  far  as 
it  has  been  fruitful  for  Christian  purposes,  has  always 
implied  in  practice  the  overthrow  of  the  rigid  traditional 
attitude  and  the  adoption  of  the  critical  attitude  in 
essence  by  always  claiming  the  right  consciously  or  un- 
consciously to  choose  some  parts  of  the  Bible  for  edifica- 
tion in  comparative  disregard  of  the  rest.  It  has  found 
by  personal  experiment  and  an  instinctive  religious 
valuation  what,  for  purposes  of  systematic  instruction, 
must  be  found  by  scientific  methods.  In  reality,  the 
traditional  dogma  of  the  Bible  is  only  a  belated  or  borrowed 
theory  which  attempts  to  justify  the  religious  value  of 
parts  of  the  Bible  as  discovered  by  experience,  and  is 
extended  by  the  logic  of  uniformity  to  other  parts  and 
to  the  Bible  as  a  whole.  It  explains  that  experience  in 
the  wrong  way  by  borrowing  its  categories  from  Jewish 


40    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

and  Pagan  sources  instead  of  building  upon  the  Cliristian 
facts  themselves. 


Attitude  of  the  Great  Preachers  and  Teachers 

It  is  worth  noting  also  that  this  free  critical  attitude 
for  which  we  are  pleading  has  always  supplied  the  central 
core  of  Christian  teaching  and  preaching  as  that  has  been 
conceived  by  all  the  greatest  Christian  teachers  and 
preachers  in  history.  As  Sir  George  Adam  Smith  has 
pointed  out/  the  modern  critical  movement  leaves  the 
very  highest  kind  of  preaching  practically  untouched. 
The  great  preachers  have  always  instinctively  used  those 
parts  of  the  Bible  which  modern  criticism  has  now  scientifi- 
cally shown  to  be  the  most  fundamental  and  the  peculiar 
Christian  element  in  the  Bible.  They  have  in  practice 
instinctively  adopted  that  attitude  towards  their  material 
which  we  now  find  to  be  best  fitted  to  bring  us  face  to  face 
with  its  peculiar  value  in  history  and  for  life.  The  best 
preaching  has  always  been  personal  and  has  always  in- 
sisted upon  its  right  to  choose  its  own  material  from  the 
Bible  in  spite  of  all  theory.  It  has  gone  straight  as  an 
arrow  to  the  human  experience,  character  and  person- 
alities of  the  Bible  for  its  material  and  dealt  with  it  in  an 
essentially  free,  human  way.  That  was  the  choice  of  its 
conscience,  and  the  prevalent  theory  was  only  brought  in 
alongside  in  order  to  enforce  the  choice.  Nothing  that  the 
modern  critic  can  say  will  compare  in  its  daring  directness 
with  the  judgment  of  Luther.  "  Christ  is  the  master,"  he 
says,  "  and  the  Scriptures  are  the  servant.  Here  is  the 
touchstone  for  testing  all  books  ;  we  must  see  whether 
they  work  the  works  of  Christ  or  not.  The  book  which 
does  not  teach  Christ  is  not  apostolic  even  were  St.  Peter 
or  St.  Paul  its  writer."  He  speaks  of  "  scrutinizing  the 
Scriptures  "  and  sometimes  finding  **  wood,  hay,  stubble 
and  not  always  gold,  silver  and  diamonds.  Nevertheless, 
the  essential  abides  and  the  fire  consumes  the  rest."^  It 
is,  of  course,  Luther,  the  prince  of  teachers  and  preachers, 

^  See  Modern  Criticism  and  the  Preaching  of  the  Old  Testament,  pp.  74-5. 
2  Quoted  in  Sabatier,  The  Religions  of  Authority  and  the  Religion  of  the 
Spirit,  pp.  13S-9. 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER     41 

who  here  breaks  through  every  dogmatic  theory  in  order 
to  find  the  real  preaching  and  teaching  material  of  the 
Bible.  He  thus  expresses  the  essential  practical  attitude 
of  all  the  very  greatest  preachers  and  teachers  of  Christian 
history,  if  not  their  theoretical  belief.  It  is  evident  that 
no  critical  results  can  ever  really  touch  any  preaching  or 
teaching  that  is  based  on  such  an  attitude,  although  it 
may  alter  the  forms  of  it  in  many  ways. 

All  this,  however,  is  only  added  testimony  to  the  fact 
that  the  rich  spiritual  content  in  the  Bible  will  make  its 
power  felt  through  and  sometimes  in  spite  of  any  and  every 
theory  with  regard  to  it. 

The  Needs  of  the  Ordinary  Teacher 

The  preaching  and  teaching  genius  of  the  first  order, 
however,  only  comes  now  and  then  into  human  history, 
and  his  influence  must  in  any  case  be  mediated  by  a  host  of 
smaller  men  in  every  generation  who  must  wearily  plod 
their  patient  way  to  those  heights  which  the  prophets 
reach  at  a  bound.  For  them  one  may  venture  once  more 
to  assert  that  the  modern  study  of  the  New  Testament  as 
human  historical  documents  of  the  prophetic  and  for- 
mative period  of  our  religion  is  a  necessary  preliminary 
if  they  are  to  make  effective  use  of  its  material  for  the 
purposes  of  systematic  instruction.  It  is  only  from  this 
point  of  view  that  the  Bible  can  find  and  retain  its  place 
permanently  in  general  modern  education.  That  applies 
to  every  stage  in  rehgious  instruction  from  the  primary 
department  upwards.  To  prevent  misconception,  however, 
it  must  be  clearly  borne  in  mind  that  this  does  not  imply 
that  critical  considerations  should  be  brought  directly  to 
the  notice  of  children.  It  does  not  mean  that  the  teacher 
is  to  talk  to  them  about  J,  E,  D  and  P,  or  about  Ur-Marcus 
and  the  Logia,  or  Q,  from  which  Matthew  and  Luke  drew 
their  material.  As  we  shall  see  later  on,  it  is  only  very, 
very  rarely  that  it  is  possible  or  desirable  to  discuss  ques- 
tions of  accuracy  or  authorship  with  children  under 
twelve — ^probably  never  except  in  answer  to  direct  inquiry. 
The  teacher's  lesson  and  actual  teaching  must  naturally  be 
positive.    The  point  is  that  his  positive  presentation  must 


42    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

be  based  upon  a  critical  consideration  of  his  material  before 
it  can  become  an  effective  element  in  the  education  of 
present-day  children,  A  brief  review  of  the  practice  of  any 
typically  modern  teacher  like  Mr.  Archibald,  or  a  brief 
consideration  of  some  of  the  most  familiar  watchwords  of 
modern  educators,  would  make  this  at  once  evident.  It 
would  be  seen  that  if  modern  educational  methods  are  to 
find  a  home  in  Biblical  instruction,  the  methods  and  main 
results  of  Biblical  criticism  must  be  adopted  by  the  teacher 
as  the  basis  of  all  his  study  and  teaching — quite  apart  from 
the  fact  that  it  is  only  by  their  means  that  a  true  view  of 
the  Bible  can  be  taught  to  the  child. 

The  Parting  of  the  Ways 

It  is  really  high  time  that  this  should  be  regarded  as 
finally  settled  in  Christian  instruction.  It  is  at  the  root 
of  a  great  deal  of  the  trouble  which  this  time  of  transition 
has  brought  in  religious  instruction,  while  lack  of  clearness 
with  regard  to  it  accounts  for  a  good  deal  of  the  futility 
of  many  earnest  attempts  at  reform.  We  cannot  indeed 
hope  to  make  much  progress  in  the  effective  teaching  of  the 
Christian  Gospel  and  the  New  Testament  to  the  modern 
world  until  the  policy  of  the  Christian  teacher  in  this  matter 
has  been  finally  settled.  Teaching  an  infallible  oracle  and 
an  historical  record  of  moral  and  religious  experience  are 
two  very  different  and  contradictory  things,  which  require 
not  only  very  different  methods  but  also  a  very  different 
type  of  material  used  for  a  very  different  purpose. 

It  is  mere  childishness  to  imagine  that  the  reverence 
of  men  for  the  Bible  and  its  moral  and  religious  value  for 
their  lives  can  be  diminished  by  telling  '  the  truth  in 
love  '  about  its  origin,  history  and  character,  or  that  its 
dignity  and  spiritual  power  can  ever  be  preserved  and  in- 
creased by  insistence  upon  an  antiquated  and  essentially 
pagan  theory  of  its  external  authority  as  an  infallible 
oracle  on  all  kinds  of  subjects  and  a  crudely  supernatural 
prodigy.  What  the  Bible  is,  it  always  has  been  and  always 
will  be,  because  men  have  heard  the  voice  of  God  in  and 
through  it.  The  final  test  of  our  reverence  for  it  and  our 
belief  in  it  will  be  in  our  utter  trust  in  its  inherent  power 


NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER    43 

to  reach  tlie  mind  and  heart  and  will — the  conscience  of 
youth.  The  best  that  our  instruction  can  do  is  to  give  it 
as  good  a  chance  as  we  can  to  do  its  work.  As  Dr.  Stanley 
Hall  says  :  "  Youth  most  of  all  needs  this  greatest  of 
human  documents,  and  needs  to  read  it  with  absolute 
freedom  and  honesty  of  mind  ;  and  there  is  no  danger 
but  that  the  new  light,  already  shining  from  it  and  yet  to 
be  revealed  by  their  methods  (those  of  the  historical  school 
of  Bible  study),  will  make  the  new  to  the  old  as  astronomy 
to  astrology,  and  will  make  young  men  not  sceptics  but 
apologists."  1 

BOOKS 

Bacon  (B.  W.). — The  Making  of  the  New  Testament.  (London,  1913.) 
Jesus  and  Paul.     (London,  1921.) 

Gardner  (P.). — A  Historic  View  of  the  New  Testament.    (London,  1904.) 

M'Lachlan  (H.). — The  New  Testament  in  the  Light  of  Modern  Know- 
ledge.    (London,  1914.) 

MoFFATT  (J.). — An  Introduction  to  the  Literature  of  the  New  Testament. 
(Edinburgh,  1920.)  The  Approach  to  the  New  Testament.  (London, 
1921.) 

^Adolescence,  vol.  ii.  p.  324. 


CHAPTER  III 

THE   PLACE   OF   THE    NEW   TESTAMENT   IN   EDUCATION 

:.  The  New  Testament  and  Modern  Values. — The  Educational  Value 
of  the  New  Testament — Education  and  the  Preservation  of 
Values — The  Records,  Creative  Epochs  and  their  Educational 
Significance. 

;.  Educational  Features  of  the  New  Testament. — The  Conflict  of  Ideals 
— The  Literature  of  Personality — A  System  of  Values — Social 
Significance. 

;.  The  New  Testament  and  Adolescence. — Grading  the  Material — 
Features  of  Adolescence — Adolescent  Features  in  the  New 
Testament — Adolescent  Interest  in  the  New  Testament — The 
Natural  Food  of  Youth, 


THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  MODERN  VALUES 

Having  before  us  such  a  New  Testament  as  has  been 
described  in  the  previous  chapter,  we  cannot  but  ask 
what  special  claim  a  collection  and  selection  of  documents 
of  this  kind  can  have  upon  the  modern  educator.  What 
kind  of  educational  authority  can  be  associated  with 
such  a  New  Testament  ?  What  peculiar  function  can  it 
perform  in  a  system  of  education  directed  towards  moral 
and  religious  ends  ?  Is  there  anything  in  the  nature  and 
form  of  its  contents  to  the  call  of  which  any  definite  stage 
of  moral  and  religious  growth  will  spontaneously  respond  ? 
Is  it  capable  of  satisfying  any  fundamental  educational 
need  in  a  more  effective  way  than  any  other  material 
within  our  reach  ? 

The  Educational  Value  of  the  New  Testament 

Some  intelligible  answer  must  now  be  found  to  such 
questions  as  these,  for  henceforth  the  place  of  the  Bible 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION    45 

in  education  must  depend  entirely  upon  the  quality  and 
power  of  its  content  and  not  upon  any  theory  of  its  origin. 

The  writings  of  the  New  Testament  are  in  the  first 
place  historical  documents.  They  are  records  of  the 
past.  Is  there  any  special  reason  why  they  should  not 
be  relegated  to  the  Museum  with  a  great  many  other 
relics  of  days  gone  by  ?  What  special  justification  is 
there  for  their  continued  life  in  the  School  ? 

It  is  possible  and  also  quite  legitimate  to  claim  a 
special  place  for  some  kind  of  study  of  the  New  Testament 
by  dilating  upon  the  fact  that  the  Bible  is  in  any  case  an 
essential  element  in  the  civilization  of  Europe,  and  that 
therefore  no  one  can  be  called  properly  educated  who 
does  not  know  the  Bible.  We  might  enlarge  upon  it  as 
the  great  classic  of  English  Literature.  Such  facts  must 
certainly  claim  the  attention  of  modern  educators  when 
they  are  discussing  this  subject,  but  they  will  not  satisfy 
the  claim  usually  made  for  the  educational  use  of  the 
New  Testament.  They  provide,  after  all,  only  very  sub- 
ordinate arguments  for  that  educational  use,  and  do  not, 
in  fact,  bring  us  face  to  face  with  the  real  and  peculiar 
contribution  of  the  New  Testament.  It  is  specifically  a 
religious  book,  and  all  its  other  qualities  have  originally 
sprung  from  its  characteristic  spiritual  message  and  power. 
If  it  is  to  find  its  own  special  niche  in  the  educational 
building,  it  must  in  the  end  be  because  of  the  special  help 
it  can  give  in  the  moral  and  religious  training  of  men  and 
women.  It  sprang  out  of  religious  life  and  was  written 
for  religious  purposes.  Every  other  quality  it  possesses 
is  only  by  the  way,  and  every  other  influence  it  may  have 
exerted  is  ultimately  due  to  its  spiritual  character. 

Now,  we  have  already  seen  that  modern  educators  are 
by  this  time  practically  agreed  that  religion,  in  spirit  if  not 
in  form,  is  and  must  be  a  central  constituent  in  the  natural 
process  of  education.  What,  then,  is  the  special  contribu- 
tion of  the  New  Testament  to  religion,  and  to  religion 
as  an  educational  force  ?  Naturally,  it  is  the  contribu- 
tion which  Christianity  makes  to  religion  in  general. 
The  New  Testament  is  throughout  the  outcome  of  the 
Christian  movement,  and  any  contribution  it  can  make  to 
education  must  be  a  specifically  Christian  contribution. 


46    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

It  is  not  the  whole  of  that  Christian  contribution.  This 
would  include  the  influence  of  the  Christian  Church, 
Christian  personalities,  Christian  history  and  literature 
outside  the  New  Testament,  and  especially  all  these 
Christian  elements  which  are  to-day  still  living  and  active 
all  around  us.  But  if  the  New  Testament  is  not  the  whole 
of  the  Christian  contribution  to  education,  it  may  well 
represent  the  whole  in  essence,  and  it  is  undoubtedly  the 
central  element  in  the  whole.  It  may  not  be  the  best 
means  of  bringing  the  influence  of  the  Christian  Church  or 
Christian  theology  to  bear  upon  the  process  of  education, 
but  it  is  at  least  still  unique  in  the  means  which  it  places 
at  our  disposal  to  present  the  spiritual  power  behind  the 
Christian  Church  and  Christian  theology  effectively  in  its 
purest  form.  It  is,  on  the  face  of  it,  our  only  record  of  the 
first  creative  period  of  the  Christian  Gospel  when  it  came 
fresh  and  original  into  the  world  and  was  held  passionately 
as  the  primary  motive  of  life. 

That  is,  in  brief,  the  first  step  towards  a  general 
educational  valuation  of  the  New  Testament,  but  its 
complete  justification  as  an  educational  instrument  of 
peculiar  significance  calls  for  a  much  fuller  discussion  than 
this  implies. 

Education  and  the  Preservation  of  Values 

Education,  after  all,  like  Religion  itself,  deals  with  the 
living  issues  of  the  growing  soul  in  the  present  and  in  the 
future,  and  no  mere  past  or  its  record  can  claim  any  right 
of  entry  into  its  schools  except  the  right  of  effective 
service  in  dealing  with  those  issues.  Fundamental, 
natural  education,  as  we  have  seen,  consists  of  spontaneous 
growth  through  personal  living  experiences.  All  other 
systematic  education  and  instruction — in  School  or  Church 
or  any  other  institution — are  only  attempts  to  make  up 
for  the  inevitable  lack  of  range,  variety  and  intensity 
of  these  personal  experiences  by  means  of  the  organiza- 
tion of  environment,  guidance  and  other  influences 
necessary  to  provide  opportunity  for  the  fullest  growth 
of  the  human  young.  These  attempts  all  spring  from  the 
recognition  of  the  fact  that  there  do  exist  in  the  life  of 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION     47 

humanity  certain  '  goods  '  which  are  worth  preserving, 
and  which  must  be  reproduced  and  increased  from  genera- 
tion to  generation  for  the  sake  of  its  continued  Hfe  and 
growth.  There  is  a  growing  tendency  to  find  in  this 
recognition  of  values — and  especially  the  supreme  values 
of  goodness,  truth  and  beauty — the  deepest  meaning  and 
the  strongest  motive  in  man.  The  meaning  of  all  educa- 
tion is  to  be  found  in  the  desire  to  secure,  as  the  only 
guarantee  of  progress,  that  the  young  should  appropriate 
these  '  values  '  even  though  they  cannot,  owing  to  the 
naturally  narrow  range  of  their  experiences,  come  into 
direct  personal  contact  with  their  most  powerful  bearers, 
or  cannot  by  their  unaided  immature  judgment  recognize 
the  call  of  these  '  values  '  amidst  the  chaos  of  conflicting 
sensations  and  presentations. 

These  values  may  range  from  the  power  to  read,  write 
or  count,  through  the  physical  sciences,  political  and  social 
institutions,  family,  State,  Church,  to  purely  moral  and 
spiritual  values  like  brotherhood,  faith,  hope,  love,  for- 
giveness, freedom,  humanity  and  God.  What  is  significant 
educationally  about  them  is  not  only  that  they  are  the 
guarantees  of  present  reality  and  future  growth,  and  the 
strongest  motives  which  lead  to  fuller  life,  but  also  that 
they  all  have  their  history  and  have  grown  out  of  history. 
To  each  belongs  its  creative  epoch  and  period  when  it 
was  first  revealed,  created  and  produced  in  and  by  some 
personality  or  group-movement  of  men.  For  lack  of 
direct  personal  contact  with  these  creative  souls  or  move- 
ments, it  is  the  historical  record  of  them,  where  preserved, 
that  provides  the  essential  and  most  effective  educational 
material  for  the  reproduction  and  increase  of  the  special 
values  they  created. 

Creative  Epochs  and  their  Educational  Significance 

That  is  the  real  justification  of  the  use  of  the  past  for 
present  and  future  education.  It  is  the  living  past  alone 
— the  past  which  reveals  most  clearly  and  powerfully 
the  living  issues  of  the  present — that  can  claim  to  provide 
material  for  *  educative  '  instruction,  because  it  represents 
values  for  the  present  and  the  future. 


48    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

This,  therefore,  is  what  justifies  the  prominent  place 
given  to  Greek  and  Roman  Literature  and  History  in  a 
modern  system  of  education.  Out  of  them  have  come 
in  the  main  those  values  of  truth,  beauty  and  law  without 
which  no  European  civilization  has  existed  or  can  ever 
exist. 

It  is  also  and  equally  the  supreme  justification  for 
the  use  of  the  New  Testament,  and  to  a  lesser  degree  of 
the  Old  Testament  in  modern  education.  The  history 
we  have  in  the  New  Testament  is  in  a  supreme  degree 
the  kind  of  history  which  must  always  claim  the  attention 
of  the  educator.  It  represents  a  movement  of  moral 
originality,  of  religious  awakening,  of  enterprise  and 
ideals.  It  is  not  primarily  a  history  of  organization 
and  abstract  theological  doctrine,  but  of  overflowing 
spiritual  life — of  religion  as  a  driving  impulse  from  above, 
as  creative  emotion,  as  living  thought  and  expanding 
activity.  There  is  no  movement  in  history  so  intimately 
and  essentially  connected  not  only  with  the  spread  but 
also  with  the  creation  of  so  many  of  the  central  moral 
values  which  dominate  the  highest  forms  of  thought, 
sentiment  and  activity  of  modern  life.  Apart  from  the 
specifically  religious  values  themselves,  the  best  elements 
in  modern  civilization  are  represented  by  the  ethical 
interpretation  of  the  universe,  the  spiritual  interpreta- 
tion of  nature  and  history,  the  principle  of  ethical  inward- 
ness, the  interpenetration  of  morality  and  religion,  the 
modern  emphasis  on  personality,  the  value  of  the  in- 
dividual, the  organic  conception  of  society,  universal 
brotherhood,  democracy,  the  supremacy  of  active  love, 
moral  freedom  and  a  number  of  other  similar  ideas  and 
ideals.  These  are  one  and  all  more  or  less  intimately 
associated  with  the  early  history  of  the  Christian  Gospel, 
and  more  or  less  clearly  represented  in  it. 

It  is  probable  that  the  prophetic  movement  in  Israel, 
some  aspects  of  Judaism,  Roman  Law,  the  Mystery- 
Cults  of  the  East,  Stoicism  and  other  movements  of  the 
Hellenistic  civilization,  going  back  to  Aristotle,  Plato 
and  Socrates,  had  a  larger  share  than  many  Christian 
apologists  realize  in  preparing  the  way  for  these  ideals, 
and  were  significant  factors  in  their  origin. 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION     49 

All  the  same,  there  is  no  other  record  in  history  in 
which  their  essential  nature  and  the  co-ordination  of  so 
many  of  them  are  so  effectively  portrayed  as  in  the 
significant  parts  of  the  New  Testament.  There  is  none 
in  which  their  origin  is  recorded  in  a  form  so  suitable 
for  educational  purposes  or  wherein  such  powerful  help 
is  offered  and  such  impetus  given  for  their  reproduction 
in  personal  and  social  life.  A  brief  reference  to  some  of 
the  main  educational  features  of  the  New  Testament  will 
suffice  to  make  clear  its  possibilities  in  this  respect. 


EDUCATIONAL  FEATURES  OF  THE  NEW 
TESTAMENT 

The  Conflict  of  Ideals 

I .  One  of  the  elements  in  the  literature  of  the  New 
Testament  which  give  its  presentation  of  moral  and 
spiritual  values  this  extraordinary  educational  power  is 
that  it  is  no  mere  intellectual  account  of  their  origin 
and  meaning,  but  is  a  living  picture  of  their  actual 
emergence  and  progress  to  supremacy  in  and  through 
strenuous  conflict  between  them  and  the  traditional 
ideals  which  they  replaced.  In  the  New  Testament  we 
can  actually  see  the  new  and  the  old  locked  in  a  life  and 
death  struggle.  Moreover,  it  provides  us  not  with  one 
form  only,  but  with  varied  expressions  of  this  conflict. 

It  is  a  commonplace  among  educators  that  in  com- 
parison and  contrast  we  have  a  factor  of  peculiar  signifi- 
cance in  the  process  of  education.  It  means,  therefore, 
a  considerable  addition  to  the  educative  power  of  the 
New  Testament  that  in  it  we  see  the  new  moral  and 
spiritual  values  emerging  in  conflict  with  the  old  ideals 
already  in  possession  of  the  field,  and  that  in  the  records 
of  Jesus,  Paul  and  John  especially  we  have  that  conflict 
in  several  different  forms. 


50    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  Literature  of  Personality 

2.  A  still  greater  significance  is  given  to  the  New 
Testament  as  educative  material  by  the  fact  that  it  brings 
before  us  these  spiritual  values  incorporated  in  person- 
alities of  great  power,  sanity  and  clarity.  Practically  all 
its  material  is  the  direct  expression  of  personality  and  is 
gathered  round  a  series  of  great  personalities.  It  is  first 
and  foremost  a  literature  of  personal  power.  It  is  the 
fact  that  the  writers  have  succeeded  in  bringing  before 
us  so  vividly  the  figures  of  Peter,  Paul,  John  (whether 
Apostle  or  not)  and  most  of  all  Jesus — it  is  this  which 
gives  the  New  Testament  its  most  prominent  peculiarity. 
Even  those  parts  which  seem  at  first  sight  to  fall  into 
the  region  of  history — in  the  sense  of  events — and  even 
the  teaching,  doctrinal  discussions  and  questions  of 
organization  are  best  appreciated,  best  understood  and 
best  used  in  direct  connection  with  this  personal  element. 
This  is  especially  true  of  the  Letters  of  Paul.  For  educa- 
tional purposes,  their  greatest  value  lies  not  in  what  they 
say  about  theological  doctrines  or  the  organization  of 
the  Church,  but  in  the  light  they  cast  upon  the  life,  work 
and  personal  religion  of  the  Apostle  himself. 

"  By  what  quality,"  asks  Dr.  Felix  Adier,  "  in  them- 
selves or  fortunate  constellation  of  circumstances  did 
Homer  and  the  Biblical  writers  succeed  ...  in  creating 
types  of  the  utmost  universality  and  yet  imparting  to 
them  the  breath  of  life,  the  gait  and  accent  of  distinctive 
individuality  ?  I  imagine  that  they  succeeded  because 
they  lived  at  a  time  when  life  was  much  less  complex 
than  it  is  at  present,  when  the  conversation,  the  manners, 
the  thoughts,  the  motives  of  men  were  simple.  They  were 
enabled  to  individualize  the  universal  because  the  most 
universal,  the  simplest  motives,  still  formed  the  main- 
spring in  the  conduct  of  individuals.  It  was  not  necessary 
for  them  to  enter  into  the  barren  region  of  abstraction 
and  generalization  to  discover  the  universal.  They  pic- 
tured what  they  actually  saw."  ^ 

Such  a  general  explanation  may  be  adequate  for  the 
Old  Testament,  but  the  age  of  the  New  Testament  was  in 

1  The  Moral  Instruction  of  Children,  pp.  108-9. 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION    51 

its  way  as  complex  an  age  as  our  own,  and  the  tendency 
towards  abstractions  was  perhaps  even  greater.  It 
would  be  truer  to  say  that  in  contrast  with  their  age  in 
general,  the  men  and  writers  of  the  New  Testament  lived 
so  entirely  in  the  region  of  the  great  moral  and  spiritual 
simplicities  that  the  concrete  personal  picture  of  them 
naturally  and  inevitably  attains  universality. 

In  any  case,  the  fact  is  that  the  New  Testament 
writers  have  actually  succeeded  in  depicting  great  per- 
sonalities of  distinctive  individuality  who  are  at  the  same 
time  types  of  the  utmost  universality.  Teaching  the  New 
Testament  essentially  means  making  these  men  live  again 
in  the  mind  and  heart  and  conscience  of  our  scholars. 
Whatever  else  we  do  or  leave  undone,  this  must  remain  our 
central  task,  and  the  tragedy  of  our  present-day  teaching 
is  that  our  whole  curriculum  is  framed  in  such  a  way  as 
to  prevent  this  being  done  in  any  effective  way.  We  are 
bringing  men  into  contact  with  the  written  word  rather 
than  the  living  souls  behind  it.  We  are  teaching  books 
instead  of  men,  and  we  leave  them  with  abstract  and  dead 
ideas  instead  of  concrete,  personal  inspiration.  All  the 
energy  of  our  educational  passion  should  be  thrown  into 
the  task  of  presenting  the  life,  work  and  personality  of 
Paul,  and  still  more  of  Jesus,  in  such  a  way  as  to  do  their 
work  once  more  upon  the  minds  and  hearts  and  the  souls 
of  the  youth  ;  and  for  the  sake  of  our  Gospel,  we  should 
be  willing  to  sacrifice  everything  else  in  order  to  do 
that. 

This  realization  of  the  supreme  spiritual  values  in 
personal,  individual  forms — especially  in  Jesus  Christ, 
whose  character  runs  on  such  extraordinarily  clear,  simple 
and  pure  lines — means  a  great  addition  to  educational 
efficiency  as  compared  with  the  presentation  of  the  ideal 
in  and  for  itself.  "  Logical  or  mathematical  truth,"  says 
Dr.  Barbour,  "  attains  universality  by  a  sacrifice  of  the 
concrete  ;  while  moral  truth  gains  universal  assent — 
the  assent  of  will  above  all — only  in  so  far  as  it  appeals 
to  the  imagination  and  rouses  the  slumbering  ideals  in 
the  hearts  of  all.  Further,  since  it  is  directed  to  action, 
it  is  most  cogent  when  it  appears  not  as  a  formula,  which 
still   needs  translation  into  terms  of  practice,   but   as   a 


52    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

living   example,  showing  what  goodness  is  in  reality  and 
deed."  i 

A  Unified  System  of  Values 

3.  The  result  of  this  incorporation  of  spiritual  values 
in  personalities  like  Paul  and  Jesus  is  that  what  we  get 
in  the  New  Testament,  and  especially  in  Christ,  is  not 
merely  a  number  of  separate  disconnected  ideals  or  a 
series  of  independent  moral  and  religious  values  side  by 
side,  but  a  whole  unified  system  of  values.  What  marks 
Him  is  what  has  been  called  a  '  transvaluation  of  all 
values.'  What  is  revealed  in  Him  is  a  whole  new  spiritual 
life  and  world — a  new  orientation  of  all  values  which  is 
for  Him  and  becomes  for  His  disciples  through  Him — the 
ultimate,  the  divine  life — that  '  new  man  '  and  '  newness 
of  life  '  of  which  Paul  speaks.  There  is  no  need  to  labour 
the  point  that  without  this  element  of  unity  and  con- 
sistency there  can  be  no  thorough  appreciation  and 
assimilation  of  the  separate  and  independent  values  of 
life  one  by  one.  "Judgments  of  value,"  says  Professor 
Seth  Pringle-Pattison,  "  .  .  .  are  not  to  be  taken  ...  as 
so  many  detached  and  mutually  independent  pronounce- 
ments of  one  faculty  or  another  upon  particular  features 
or  aspects  of  the  world.  They  represent  rather  so  many 
parts  of  one  fundamental  judgment  in  which  the  nature 
of  reality,  as  exhibited  in  the  system,  may  be  said  to 
affirm  itself.  Every  particular  judgment  depends  for  its 
ultimate  sanction  on  the  recognition  of  its  object  as  a 
contributory  element  to  this  inclusive  whole."  ^ 

The  Social  Significance   of   Early  Christian 
Personalities 

4.  One  other  element  at  least  deserves  to  be  men- 
tioned in  any  attempt  at  some  general  appreciation  of 
the  educational  value  of  the  New  Testament.  Its  great 
personalities  as  the  revealers  and  bearers  of  a  new  spiritual 
life  and  world  do  not  appear  merely  as  isolated  individuals 
fighting  simply  for  their  own  spiritual  emancipation,  but 

^  A  Philosophical  Study  of  Christian  Ethics,  p.  299. 
-  The  Idea  of  God,  p.  223. 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION    53 

as,  in  their  different  ways,  leaders  of  group-movements. 
Their  appearance  and  activities  have  an  essentially  social 
significance.  This  is  the  case  not  only  with  regard  to 
Jesus  and  Paul  in  their  different  ways.  All  the  other 
representative  figures  also — Peter,  Luke  and  Mark,  as 
well  as  John  and  the  author  of  the  Epistle  to  the  Hebrews 
— are  not  only  typical  figures  in  themselves,  but  even  in 
their  writings  they  probably  have  behind  them  social 
groups  and  circles  with  fairly  well-defined  types  of  thought 
and  Christian  attitude  which  they  represent. 

This  also  implies  a  definite  addition  to  the  educative 
value  and  power  of  the  history  and  literature  of  the  New 
Testament. 

It  is  very  probable  that  further  consideration  of  the 
material  of  the  New  Testament,  from  this  point  of  view, 
will  bring  to  light  other  elements  which  will  help  to  sub- 
stantiate its  claim  to  be  and  to  remain  the  most  significant 
material  in  any  intelligent  and  thorough  system  of  modern 
education  and  instruction. 

If  it  is  the  aim  of  education  to  preserve  and  increase 
the  values  which  give  meaning  and  power  to  modern  life 
as  a  whole,  then  undoubtedly  all  serious  educators  must 
look  upon  the  New  Testament  as  a  most  significant 
element  in  the  material  at  their  disposal.  There  is  no 
other  extant  literature,  neither  Jewish,  Greek  nor  Latin, 
which  brings  together  within  so  manageable  a  compass 
such  a  vivid  record  and  living  picture  of  the  origin  and 
spread  of  those  intrinsic  values  and  moral  ideals  which 
alone  make  modern  life  worth  living.  If  there  are  other 
records  which  perform  the  same  or  a  similar  service  for 
some  of  these  ideals,  there  is  no  other  which  puts  their 
creative  material  into  such  sharp  contrast  with  the  old, 
shows  them  going  forth  conquering  and  to  conquer  with 
such  power,  incorporates  them  in  such  personal,  individual 
and  yet  universal  forms,  reveals  them  so  much  as  a  unified 
system  and  gives  them  such  social  significance.  That 
means  to  say,  there  is  no  other  which  presents  the  material 
in  so  essential  and  so  natural  an  educative  form  as  the  New 
Testament. 

All  these  qualities  in  the  New  Testament,  quite  apart 
from  its  subsequent  history,  its  general  contribution  to 


54    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

the  civilization  of  Europe  and  its  educational  traditions, 
provide  adequate  justification  for  its  very  large  use  in 
education,  and  that  because  of  the  very  nature  and  form 
of  its  contents. 

They  will  also  help  to  make  clear  the  proper  and 
peculiar  place  of  the  New  Testament  in  the  process  of 
education,  and  the  definite  stage  at  which  its  use  will 
become  most  effective. 

3 

THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  AND  ADOLESCENCE 

Having  thus  marked  out  the  general  function  of  the 
New  Testament  in  Education  and  enumerated  some  of 
the  qualities  which  make  it  supremely  capable  of  per- 
forming that  function,  we  now  proceed  to  ask  where  it 
fits  most  naturally  into  the  process  of  Christian  education  ? 
Is  there  any  point  at  which  we  must  almost  inevitably 
turn  to  the  New  Testament  for  our  material  ?  Is  it 
particularly  adapted  for  infancy  or  youth  or  maturity  ? 
Or  can  it  be  used  indiscriminately  at  all  ages  ?  Is  there 
any  particular  stage  at  which  we  can  with  any  confidence 
say  :  It  is  just  here  that  the  peculiar  contribution  of 
the  New  Testament  comes  naturally  to  its  own  in  moral 
and  religious  instruction  and  education  ? 

Grading  the  Material 

There  is  no  need  to  emphasize  the  fact  that  we  have 
here  one  of  our  fundamental  educational  problems,  the 
answer  to  which  ought  practically  to  decide  the  whole 
framework  of  our  moral  and  religious  curriculum.  The 
traditional  practice  was  to  drop  a  New  Testament  passage 
down  anywhere,  and,  as  in  the  case  of  the  old  International 
Lessons,  this  practice  was  based  upon  the  supposition 
that  every  part  of  the  Bible  provides  suitable  material 
for  all  ages.  The  modern  study  of  educational  Psychology, 
however,  has  by  this  time  driven  that  theory  out  of  the 
field,  but  not  always  with  the  result  of  dismissing  the 
practice  that   corresponds  to  it.     We  all  recognize  that 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION     55 

the  moral  and  religious  growth  of  the  individual  is  divided 
into  the  periods  of  Infancy,  Childhood  and  Adolescence 
before  maturity — each  with  its  own  peculiar  character- 
istics, needs,  interests  and  capacities.  We  are  not, 
however,  so  ready  to  apply  that  principle  in  any  thorough 
way  to  the  disposition  of  the  Biblical  material. 

So  far  as  the  New  Testament  is  concerned,  there  can 
be  no  question  as  to  the  period  to  which  its  material  as  a 
whole  belongs.  In  its  present  form  it  is  the  natural  food  of 
Adolescence.  That  period  provides  the  one  great  oppor- 
tunity of  the  Christian  Gospel  and  the  New  Testament. 
It  is  only  then  that  we  can  speak  in  any  full  sense  of 
teaching  the  New  Testament.  We  may  even  go  so  far 
as  to  say  that  it  is  then  or  not  at  all,  so  far  as  all  human 
educational  means  are  of  any  importance.  Before  that 
time,  we  can  only  prepare  the  way  for  the  great  lesson. 
Our  educational  opportunity  is,  to  all  intents  and  pur- 
poses, lost,  unless  the  Christian  motive,  the  Christian 
ideal  and  power  have  found  a  home  in  heart  and  mind 
and  will  before  maturity  is  reached.  All  the  evidence  of 
Psychology  and  experience,  of  history  and  New  Testa- 
ment study,  points  directly  to  the  fact  that  the  Christian 
Gospel  is  the  Gospel  of  Youth,  that  the  New  Testament, 
both  in  the  character  and  form  of  its  content,  is  especially 
adapted  for  the  needs  of  youth,  and  that  youth  in  its 
need  and  capacity  cries  out  for  both.  For  the  full 
psychological,  historical  and  educational  evidence  for 
these  statements  the  reader  must  be  referred  to  the 
one  great  study  of  Adolescence  by  Dr.  Stanley  Hall. 

Features  of  Adolescence 

For  every  individual  the  years  between  thirteen  and 
twenty-four  are  the  most  fateful  years  of  life — the  years 
that  make  or  mar  almost  without  exception.  With  the 
gradual  passing  of  childhood  begins  the  great  flowering 
time  of  the  human  spirit  in  Adolescence  and  Youth. 
"  This  is  the  golden  period  of  life,  when  all  that  is  greatest 
and  best  in  heart  and  will  are  at  their  strongest.  If 
the  race  ever  advances  to  higher  levels,  it  must  be  by 
increments  at  this  stage,  for  all  that  follows  it  is  marked 


56    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

by  decline."!  "True  religion  culminates  in  Youth,  and 
doctrine  is  its  substitute  and  memorial  in  maturity  and 
old  age.  Youth  has  far  more  to  teach  in  this  field,  if  it 
only  knew  how,  than  it  can  learn  from  age."  2  The  glory 
of  its  triumphs  no  tongue  can  tell,  while  its  tragedies  are 
too  deep  for  tears.  Abundant,  overflowing  life  comes 
pouring  into  mind  and  heart  and  will — into  body  and 
soul  ;  and  life  goes  pouring  out  again  prodigally  and 
recklessly  in  tumbling  waves  of  contradictory  activities. 
The  child  leaves  the  quiet  haven  to  embark  upon  a  sea 
of  troubles — significant  enough  even  when  most  imaginary 
— its  tiny  bark  at  the  mercy  of  every  wind  that  blows 
and  every  wave  that  breaks.  It  is  an  exploring,  expand- 
ing, adventurous  time,  a  time  of  hopeless  fears,  of  fearless 
and  fearful  hopes,  a  time  of  boundless  faiths  and  of  dark 
despair,  of  love  that  mars  and  of  love  that  makes.  It 
scales  the  heights  of  heaven  and  there  meets  God,  or  it 
may  descend  and  be  singed  with  the  fires  of  hell.  The 
only  thing  it  may  not  do  is  to  jog  contentedly  along 
the  conventional  paths  of  earth. 

Only  a  confusion  of  metaphors  can  attempt  to  describe 
this  period,  for  it  is  not  a  world  but  a  chaos — a  chaos 
waiting  for  the  Spirit  to  move  upon  the  face  of  the  waters 
and  for  the  divine  word  :  "  Let  there  be  light."  If  the 
light  does  come  it  will  come  with  creative  power  which 
will  probably  mark  out  for  ever  the  boundaries  of  earth 
and  sky,  of  land  and  sea,  and  in  the  end  make  man  out 
of  the  dust  of  the  earth. 

But  if  Youth  does  come  to  the  light,  it  must  come  in 
its  own  free  way.  It  snaps  at  external  control,  and  no 
Creed  or  Dogma  can  hold  it.  Its  teacher  must  be  its 
comrade  and  its  lover  first  of  all — ready  to  start  at  any 
moment  on  any  great  adventure  or  any  forlorn  hope. 
Yet  no  age  will  bend  so  utterly  before  its  chosen  gods. 
Indeed,  the  first  and  greatest  task  of  the  educator  is  to 
reveal  to  Youth  the  gods  to  choose  from,  give  him  as  many 
strong  examples  as  he  can  gather  of  the  better  choice — 
the  teacher's  own  among  the  rest — and  then  murmur 
reverently,  "  If  Youth  but  knew  " — the  God  to  choose. 

^  Stanley  Hall,  Educational  Problems,  vol.  i.  p.  163. 
-  Stanley  Hall,  Adolescence,  vol.  ii.  p.  317. 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION     57 

It  shames  us  to  think  how  mean  and  puny,  how 
haphazard  and  helpless,  is  the  service  we  render  Youth. 
We  are  fathers  who  give  him  stones  when  he  begs  for 
bread.  We  are  teachers  who  shake  the  mailed  fist  in 
his  face  when  he  leaps  to  the  intimate  clasp  of  the  naked 
hand.  We  shock  his  modesty  and  drag  his  secret  shames 
to  the  light  of  day.  We  laugh  at  his  seriousness  and 
sneer  at  his  dreams.  We  stamp  upon  his  tragic  doubts, 
we  chill  his  enthusiasm  and  but  too  often  leave  him  to 
sink  or  swim  in  the  storm  and  stress  of  the  spirit.  If  he 
but  seldom  drowns,  that  is  more  often  due  to  his  natural 
buoyancy  than  to  our  care.  We  do  our  best  to  keep 
him  unregenerate,  and  he  converts  himself  in  spite  of  us, 
and  worships  as  his  chosen  gods  the  dreams  and  ideals 
which  we  have  cast  away  before  middle  age  as  far  "  too 
rich  and  good  for  human  nature's  daily  food." 

You  ask  what  can  our  ordinary,  mechanical  Biblical 
Instruction  do  for  such  a  being  as  this  ?  Nothing — but 
harm.  What  can  even  the  best  instruction  do  ?  Little 
enough,  perhaps,  but  yet  that  little  may  be  enough  to 
make  all  the  difference.  Youth  needs  ideas,  and  ideas, 
and  still  more  ideas,  all  the  living  ideas  and  the  significant 
facts,  incarnate  in  the  dominating  personalities  and 
movements  of  history — the  great  spiritual  permanent 
values  in  myriad  forms  of  truth,  beauty  and  goodness. 
He  needs  to  rediscover  them  for  himself  and  to  reproduce 
them  with  those  who  first  saw^  the  face  divine,  so  that  he 
may  conserve  and  increase  them  for  the  world  to  come. 
That  is  the  demand  of  the  universe  upon  him,  for  the 
measure  of  its  progress  is  the  measure  of  Youth's  response 
to  that  call.  Youth  is  life  and  makes  life.  There  never 
is  anything  else  in  the  world,  and  no  one  else  but  those 
who  stand  and  wait  to  do  his  bidding. 

Adolescent  Features  of  the  New  Testament 

There  is  no  record  that  answers  so  readily  and  so 
fully  to  the  call  of  Youth,  nor  one  that  by  obedience  to 
his  call  is  capable  of  ruling  him  so  completely,  as  the 
New  Testament  and  what  it  represents.  Dr.  Stanley 
Hall  returns  again  and  again  to  underline  the  fact  that 


58    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

the  New  Testament  needs  Youth,  that  Youth  needs  the 
New  Testament,  and  that  in  its  story  is  eternal  youth. 

"  At  the  top  of  the  curve  of  Hfe  comes  Christianity, 
for  ever  supreme  because  it  is  the  norm  for  the  apical 
stage  of  human  development,  glorifying  adolescence  and 
glorified  by  it,  and  calculated  to  retain  and  conserve 
youth  before  the  decline  of  the  highest  powers  of  the 
soul  in  maturity  and  age."  ^ 

"  The  story  of  Jesus's  life,  psychologically  treated, 
whatever  else  it  may  be,  is  also  another  abridged  and 
variant  edition  of  the  same  import  (namely,  of  adolescent 
experience).  There  is  the  glimpse  of  an  early  life  of 
natural  growth  in  favour  of  God  and  man.  At  the  age 
of  early  Oriental  puberty  he  is  already  characteristically 
pondering  the  highest  themes  with  deepening  sense  of 
wrong  and  human  need,  a  glimmering,  conscious  higher 
mission  struggling  with  temporal  ambition,  a  long  con- 
flict of  the  noblest  adolescent  idealism  that  ever  was 
with  the  hard,  inveterate  conservatism  of  a  decadent 
age  and  senescent  man,  with  bigotry,  hypocrisy  and 
shame,  ending  in  defeat,  the  self-effacement  of  a  shameful 
death  ;  then  the  inevitable  resurgani  motive,  at  first 
incredulous  and  apparitional,  with  ascension  or  sublima- 
tion as  the  climax,  but  which  later  became  the  very 
substance  of  the  Christian  faith  and  the  corner-stone 
of  belief  in  Jesus's  deity  and  our  regeneration."  ^ 

"  Thus  the  story  of  the  Cross,  which  is  the  chief  symbol 
of  Christianity,  known  by  multitudes  who  know  nothing 
else  of  Jesus,  when  relived  and  vitally  participated  in, 
is  the  best  of  all  initiatives  to  maturity."   .  .  . 

"  The  Gospel  story  is  the  most  adequate,  classic  and 
dramatic  representation  of  the  truest  formulae  of  the  most 
critical  revolution  of  life,  to  successfully  accomplish 
which  is  to  make  catharsis  of  our  lower  nature  and  to 
attain  full  ethical  maturity  without  arrest  or  perversion  : 
this  is  the  very  meaning  of  adolescence.  As  Jesus,  the 
totemic  embodiment  of  the  race,  gathered,  unified  and 
epitomized  in  His  own  life  the  many  elements  of  autosoteric 
motive  that  were  before  scattered  and  relatively  ineffective, 
and  made  thereby  a  new  focus  of  history  to  which  so 

^  op.  cit.,  ii.  361.  -  Op.  cit.,  ii.  333-4. 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION     59 

many  lines  before  converged,  from  which  they  have  since 
diverged  ;  so  each  youth  can  now,  thanks  to  Him ,  condense 
in  his  own  hfe  the  essential  experience  of  the  race  by 
sympathetic  participation  in  this  great  psychopheme."  ^ 

"  Adolescence  is  the  time  when  Jesus's  character, 
example  and  teaching  is  most  needed.  He  was  Himself 
essentially  an  adolescent.  .  .  .  Jesus  came  to  and  for 
adolescents,  in  a  very  special  and  very  peculiar  and  till 
lately  not  understood  sense,  and  just  as  it  is  pedagogically 
wrong  to  force  Him  upon  childhood,  it  is  wrong  not  to 
teach  Him  to  adolescents.  Their  need  is  so  great  as  to 
constitute  a  mission  motive  of  even  more  warmth  and 
force  than  those  that  now  prevail.  No  matter  for  what 
creed,  race  or  civilization,  and  no  matter  what  we  think 
about  His  deity  or  even  the  veracity  of  the  record,  I  am 
convinced  that  there  is  no  career  or  character  in  history 
or  literature  which  so  fully  meets  the  deepest  needs, 
supplements  the  weaknesses  and  defects,  and  strengthens 
all  the  good  impulses  of  this  period  as  His."  ^ 

It  has  been  added  that  the  first  disciples  were  also 
in  the  adolescent  stage  of  life,_and  so  was  Paul,  when 
they  were  all  swept  into  the  Christian  movement.  The 
whole  period  covered  by  the  main  record  of  the  New 
Testament  may  indeed  easily  be  written  in  terms  of 
adolescent  experience — with  its  expanding  thought,  life 
and  activity,  with  its  enthusiasms  and  passion  and  ferment, 
with  its  exuberant  ecstasies  and  visions  and  its  apocalyptic 
dreams,  with  its  freedom  and  its  daring  and  its  impatience 
of  all  authority  and  organization.  The  whole  picture 
is  one  of  the  overflowing  freshness  of  youth — youth,  of 
course,  in  spirit  and  not  in  the  flesh.  We  lose  count  of 
the  age  in  years  of  men  like  Paul,  for  we  see  the  Gospel 
of  the  New  Testament  creating  and  re-creating  the  spirit 
of  youth  within  them,  prolonging  adolescence  to  middle 
age  and  making  even  the  old  men  dream  dreams. 

Adolescent  Interest  in  the  New  Testament 

Actual  experience  and  experiment  also  go  to  show  that 
the  New  Testament  is  thus  the  natural  food  for  adolescence. 

^  op.  cit.,  ii.  337.  2  Stanley  Hall,  Educational  Problems,  vol.  i.  163. 


6o    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

"  It  seems  to  be  a  fact,"  says  Professor  G.  A.  Coe,  "  that 
interest  in  the  New  Testament,  especially  the  Gospels 
and  the  Acts,  becomes  acute  not  far  from  the  end  of  early 
adolescence.  This  is  the  time  when  we  should  expect 
the  inner  life  of  Christ  and  the  Apostles  to  become  in- 
teresting." 1  Mr.  G.  E.  Dawson  investigated  the  subject 
of  "  Children's  Interest  in  the  Bible  "  between  the  ages 
of  eight  and  twenty,  and  found  that  between  eight  and 
thirteen  the  predominant  interest  was  in  the  Old  Testa- 
ment. After  that,  this  interest  steadily  decreases,  while 
that  in  the  New  increases,  until  at  twenty  the  Old  can 
only  claim  the  preference  of  lo  per  cent,  of  the  boys, 
while  the  New  Testament  claims  the  interest  of  90  per  cent. 
Again,  the  interest  in  the  life  and  person  of  Jesus  is  very 
little  at  the  early  ages  of  eight,  nine,  ten  and  eleven,  but 
it  steadily  grows  as  the  years  go  by  until  it  reaches  its 
height  between  fifteen  and  twenty .^ 

This  correspondence  between  the  New  Testament  and 
Adolescence  is  confirmed  by  every  feature  of  these  writings 
which  was  mentioned  in  the  previous  section.  We  saw 
that  it  is  the  literature  of  the  creative  epoch  of  the  great 
ideals,  that  it  shows  them  in  conflict  with  the  old,  that  it 
gives  them  in  personal  forms,  that  it  therefore  reveals 
them  not  as  separate  fragments,  but  as  a  unified  system 
of  values,  and  gives  them,  moreover,  a  social  significance. 

In  fact,  it  is  impossible  to  avoid  the  conclusion  that 
the  New  Testament  belongs  peculiarly  to  youth,  and  youth 
belongs  to  it  by  native  right.  It  is  his  book  and  his 
world.  It  came  forth  out  of  his  mouth,  and  it  shall  not 
return  unto  him  void,  but  it  shall  accomplish  that  which 
he  pleases  and  it  shall  prosper  in  the  thing  whereto  he 
sent  it.  Its  voice  ought  to  ring  in  the  ears  of  the  waiting 
youth  of  every  generation,  saying  in  the  accents  of  God  : 
"  Ye  shall  go  out  with  joy  and  be  led  forth  with  peace  : 
to  the  mountains  and  to  the  hills  breaking  out  before 
you  into  singing  :  and  to  all  the  trees  of  the  field  clapping 
their  hands." 

1  Education  in  Religion  and  Morals,  p.  294  n- 
^  Ped.  Sem.,  vol.  vii.  p.  151. 


PLACE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  EDUCATION    6i 

The    New  Testament  the   Natural   Food   of  Youth 

The  New  Testament  belongs  to  youth  by  right  divine, 
and  youth  belongs  to  it  by  human  need — the  New  Testa- 
ment, of  course,  not  merely  as  the  mechanical  record 
and  written  word,  the  text  of  conventional  commentary 
and  the  pretended  source  of  rigid  creed,  but  the  New 
Testament  as  the  clear  mirror  of  youth's  reckless  adven- 
ture into  the  realm  of  moral  revolution,  of  Jesus  and 
Paul  and  Peter  and  John  who  came  to  turn  the  world 
upside  down.  This  New  Testament  is  youth's  natural 
food  and  drink,  the  air  he  must  breathe  and  the  sun  that 
shines  upon  him,  just  as  Jesus  is  his  natural  Saviour 
and  Lord  by  the  authority  of  His  illimitable  faith  and  love. 
It  is  the  Temple  of  the  Holy  Spirit  of  Youth,  though  we 
have  often  made  it  into  a  den  of  thieves. 

All  this  does  not  mean  that  no  part  of  the  material 
of  the  New  Testament  can  be  effectively  adapted  for  use 
at  any  other  time  than  adolescence,  but  only  that  it 
cannot  be  used  with  the  full  purpose  and  import  of  the 
original  writers  ;  and  that  only  subordinate  fragments 
are  in  their  present  form  appropriate  at  any  earlier  stage. 
For  instance,  we  can  and  ought  to  tell  some  of  the  stories 
of  the  New  Testament,  and  especially  the  life  of  Jesus  in 
some  form,  during  the  years  of  childhood.  What,  how- 
ever, we  must  recognize  is  that  we  cannot  then  give  its 
full  Christian  meaning  to  that  life.  We  can  only  deal 
with  some  aspects  of  it  which  are  in  line  with  the  interests, 
the  needs  and  the  experience  of  the  child.  He  may  thus  be 
prepared  for  the  fuller  lesson  later  on,  but  the  material 
must  be  shorn  of  some  of  its  meaning  in  order  to  do  so. 

The  real  educational  inference  is  that  the  whole 
weight  of  teaching  the  New  Testament  in  any  full  sense 
should  fall  in  the  adolescent  period,  and  that  the  whole 
curriculum  should  be  framed  with  that  end  in  view.  The 
character  and  form  of  its  contents  is  specially  adapted  for 
that  purpose,  while  the  natural  interests  of  adolescence 
make  the  work  easier  and  more  effective  then  than  at  any 
other  time.  When  we  try  to  do  the  same  work  at  any 
other  period,  we  are  very  largely  wasting  our  time  and  only 
making  the  task  more  difficult  at  the  proper  time. 


62     THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  great  problem,  therefore,  of  the  instruction  of 
youth  in  the  New  Testament  is  the  problem  of  letting 
him  come  to  his  own — to  enter  upon  his  natural  heritage. 
It  is  the  problem  of  helping  him  to  rediscover  and  to  re- 
produce with  Jesus,  and  by  His  power,  the  supreme  spiritual 
values  which  Jesus  discovered  and  produced,  and  which 
youth  alone  can  conserve  and  increase  from  generation  to 
generation. 

BOOKS 

Clutton-Brock  (A.). — The  Ultimate  Belief.     (London,  1919.) 
Hall  (Stanley). — Adolescence.     (New  York  and  London,  1915.) 
Richmond  (K.). — The  Permanent  Values  in  Education.    (London,  1917.) 


CHAPTER  IV 

THE    EDUCATIONAL   INTERPRETATION    OF  THE    NEW 
TESTAMENT 

The  Practical  Character  of  the  New  Testament. — The  Different 
Aspects  of  the  New  Testament — Literature — History — Rehgion 
— The  Missionary  Character  of  the  New  Testament — Need  of  an 
Educational  Interpretation — Some  Misconceptions  of  its  Meaning. 

The  Educational  Study  of  the  New  Testament. — The  Different  Types 
of  Material — The  Essential  Elements  of  the  Educational  Process 
— Ideals  and  their  Realization. 

Illustrations  and  Examples. — Educational  Study  of  the  Second 
Coming — The  Parousia  in  the  New  Testament — Its  Place  and 
Value  in  the  New  Testament — Application  to  Types  of  Thought 
and  to  Personalities. 

Results  of  the  Study. — The  Rich  Variety  of  the  New  Testament — 
The  Gift  and  the  Demand — The  Educational  Value  of  this 
Variety — The  Need  for  Unity  and  Application. 


THE  PRACTICAL  CHARACTER  OF  THE  NEW 
TESTAMENT 

The  preceding  discussion  has  revealed  the  fact  that  the 
New  Testament  as  a  whole  provides  material  of  supreme 
value  for  all  education  directed  towards  moral  and  spiritual 
ends.  It  has  also  shown  that  the  teacher  of  youth  in 
particular  is  called  imperatively  to  its  study. 

Various  Aspects  of  the  New  Testament 

Many  other  types  of  students,  it  is  true,  have  legiti- 
mate interests  in  the  New  Testament,  and  in  varying 
degrees  can  claim  it  as  part  of  their  peculiar  heritage  and 

material. 

63 


64    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  New  Testament  belongs  to  the  great  Hterature  of 
the  world.  In  its  own  Hellenistic  period  and  its  own 
Hellenistic  tongue  it  towers  far  above  all  the  literary- 
records  of  the  time  in  originality,  power  and  beauty,  while 
in  many  of  its  translations  also  it  has  attained  the  for- 
mative place  in  the  development  of  literary  style.  It  is 
no  wonder,  therefore,  that  the  student  of  literature  as 
such  rejoices  in  it  and  claims  it  as  his  own. 

The  New  Testament  is  also  the  record  of  the  origin  of 
a  great  historical  movement,  destined  to  become  in  some 
form  or  other  one  of  the  decisive  factors  in  the  develop- 
ment of  the  civilization  of  Europe.  Its  material,  therefore, 
naturally  belongs  to  the  general  historian. 

It  is,  moreover,  the  history  in  particular  of  the  genesis 
and  spread  of  a  religion — and  that  the  most  significant 
religion  in  the  history  of  the  world.  It  is  therefore 
legitimately  claimed  as  his  own  by  the  student  of  religion 
and  the  religions,  and,  of  course,  still  more  peculiarly  it 
belongs  to  the  historian  of  Christianity.  Among  the 
many  workers  in  this  field  the  Christian  theologian,  both 
as  the  historian  and  the  philosopher  of  Christian  Doctrine, 
has  insistently  and  until  recently  with  success  claimed 
the  New  Testament  as  his  own  peculiar  source  and 
material. 

The  Missionary  Character  of  the  New 
Testament 

Within  definite  limits  all  these  claims  can,  of  course, 
be  amply  justified.  There  is  great  literature,  great 
history  and  in  particular  a  great  religious  and  theological 
history  in  these  writings.  Yet  it  is  neither  the  literary 
man,  nor  the  historian,  nor  the  theologian  who  has  the 
first  and  supreme  claim  upon  the  New  Testament,  but 
the  practical  teacher  of  the  Christian  Gospel — whether 
as  missionary  or  preacher  or  catechist  or  Christian  teacher 
in  the  narrower  sense.  Every  book  in  the  New  Testament 
sets  itself  deliberately  in  some  form  or  other  to  spread  the 
Christian  life,  to  confirm  Christian  faith,  to  create  and 
deepen  a  Christian  impression,  to  inspire  Christian  hopes, 
to  clarify  Christian  ideas,  to  strengthen  the  Christian  will 


THE  EDUCATIONAL  INTERPRETATION  65 

— all  of  them  different  ways  of  teaching  Christianity  and 
different  aspects  of  the  Christian  teacher's  task.  The 
definite  aim  of  each  writer  is  to  create  and  train  Christian 
disciples.  Everything  else  is  subordinate  to  that  end. 
The  writers  use  almost  every  kind  of  appeal  for  that 
purpose — now  a  burst  of  eloquent  prose,  and  again  an 
historical  account,  now  an  appeal  to  personal  religious 
experience,  and  again  a  theological  argument.  The  New 
Testament  is  throughout  an  '  edifying  '  book  in  the  true 
sense  of  that  much-abused  word  ;  it  is  intended  to  build 
up,  to  construct  Christian  disciples  and  discipleship. 
Face  to  face  with  some  actual  concrete  situation  in 
actual  life,  there  is  everywhere  an  attempt  to  make  some 
aspect  of  the  Christian  Gospel  effective  in  it. 

It  is,  therefore,  the  man  who,  in  whatever  form,  is 
trying  to  do  the  same  work  to-day — it  is  he  who  is  putting 
the  material  of  the  New  Testament  to  its  original  and 
proper  use.  The  teacher's  study  of  it  for  the  practical 
purposes  of  his  task  will  naturally  do  fuller  justice  to 
its  peculiar  nature  than  that  of  either  the  mere  historian 
or  the  scientific  theologian.  These  books  belong  to  the 
historian  and  to  the  theologian  only  in  a  secondary  sense 
— preparatory  to  its  use  for  practical  Christian  purposes 
by  the  preacher  and  the  teacher.  It  does  not  appear 
that  any  writer  of  the  New  Testament  ever  set  out  with 
the  intention  of  constructing  a  system  of  theology  or  even 
of  formulating  a  theological  doctrine. 

There  are  theological  ideas  certainly  in  the  New  Testa- 
ment and  fragments  of  many  theological  systems,  but 
they  are  always  introduced  and  employed  for  growing 
and  enriching  Christian  faith  and  life.  They  are  never, 
and  probably  can  never  be,  brought  into  any  complete 
theological  unity  or  consistency.  In  the  proper  sense 
there  is  no  such  thing  as  a  New  Testament  Theology,  and 
even  the  task  of  constructing  a  Pauline  Theology  is  very 
largely  a  matter  of  guesswork  and  of  doubtful  inferences 
from  scattered  and  incidental  references  in  a  few  of  Paul's 
letters.  We  are  always  doing  at  least  some  injustice  to 
the  apostle  and  missionary  when  we  use  his  incidental 
sayings  for  purposes  they  were  never  meant  to  serve. 
The  writers  of  the  New  Testament  can  only  have  full 
5 


66    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

justice  done  to  them  in  the  world  and  work  of  preachers 
and  teachers  of  Christ  and  His  Gospel. 


The  Need  of  an  Educational  Interpretation 

How  far  the  individual  writings  themselves  achieved 
each  its  particular  purpose  of  educating  its  first  readers, 
of  influencing  them  in  the  direction  of  the  Christian 
Gospel,  we  do  not  and  cannot  now  know  in  detail.  That 
these  writings  have  proved  effective,  and  probably  the 
most  effective  instrument  to  bring  men  to  Christ  many- 
times  since  then,  the  history  of  almost  every  religious 
revival  abundantly  proves,  while  every  man  who  reads 
them  humbly,  attentively  and  intelligently  knows  also 
their  revolutionary  power. 

The  men  who  stand  behind  the  New  Testament 
writings  certainly  achieved  a  miraculous  triumph  in  their 
practical  task  of  moving  the  men  and  the  world  of  their 
time  effectively  in  a  Christian  direction  by  their  living 
and  preaching  and  teaching  of  the  Christian  Gospel. 
The  rapid  spread  of  Christianity  throughout  the  Roman 
world  from  its  obscure  beginning  in  a  far-away  provincial 
village  is  not  only  a  testimony  to  its  own  essential  truth 
and  power,  but  also  to  the  effectiveness  of  the  teaching 
and  preaching  by  means  of  which  the  work  was  done. 
One  of  the  chief  meanings  of  the  New  Testament  is  that 
it  gives  us  the  only  record  of  what  must  have  been  the 
most  successful,  practical  and  educational  propaganda  in 
history,  and  the  only  picture  we  have  of  the  aims  and 
methods  of  the  missionaries,  and  of  the  ways  and  means 
they  used.  It  gives  us  the  Gospel  as  preached  and  taught 
— in  forms  showing  the  wealth  and  variety  of  the  interests 
and  motives  to  which  the  teachers  appealed. 

Whatever  else  the  New  Testament  is,  therefore,  it  is  a 
supreme  object-lesson  for  the  work  of  the  Christian  teacher 
and  preacher  in  every  age.  The  men  who  still  want  to 
use  it,  to  make  Christians  by  teaching  and  preaching,  by 
proclamation  of  the  Gospel  or  by  instruction,  are  the  men 
who  are  putting  the  material  of  the  New  Testament  to 
its  own  proper  and  peculiar  use — the   original   use   for 


THE  EDUCATIONAL  INTERPRETATION  67 

which  at  least  the  greatest  part  of  it  was  created  and 
written. 

Even  if  these  records  were  only  great  Hterature  and 
history,  a  study  of  them  for  definitely  educational  pur- 
poses would  certainly  be  fully  justified,  for  it  is  in  great 
literature  and  history  that  the  educator  must  always  find 
his  educative  material.  They  call  for  and  demand  such 
a  study  imperatively,  because  they  owe  their  origin 
mainly  to  the  needs  of  Christian  instruction  and  educa- 
tion and  will  not  reveal  their  full  power  under  any  other 
treatment. 


Misconceptions  of  its  Meaning 

In  thus  calling  for  a  definitely  practical  and  educational 
interpretation  and  study  of  the  New  Testament,  it  may 
be  well  at  the  outset  to  guard  against  some  possibility 
of  misconception.  The  kind  of  study  we  have  in  mind 
is  no  substitute  for  a  thoroughly  scientific  treatment. 
Neither  is  it  something  tacked  on  artificially  to  a  literary 
and  historical  study  of  these  writings.  This  practical 
study  is  itself  part  of  our  scientific  study  of  the  New 
Testament,  essential  to  it,  built  upon  a  literary  and 
historical  study  and  helpless  without  it.  Ultimately, 
indeed,  it  is  in  such  an  educational  interpretation  that  we 
find  the  climax  of  the  scientific  method  of  approaching 
and  dealing  with  the  material  of  the  New  Testament  and 
of  revealing  its  full  meaning  and  power. 

To  such  an  educational  interpretation  there  will  be 
two  aspects — one  descriptive  and  the  other  appreciative. 
The  descriptive  study  will  attempt  to  interpret  the  New 
Testament  historically  as  the  material  actually  used  by 
the  first  teachers  and  preachers  and  missionaries  of  the 
Christian  Gospel  in  their  varied  efforts  to  make  Christians 
out  of  the  people  of  their  time.  The  second  or  apprecia- 
tive study  will  consider  whether,  how  far  and  in  what 
way  the  Christian  teacher  to-day  can  use  the  same 
material  for  the  purpose  of  making  Christian  disciples  in 
the  twentieth  century.  It  deals,  that  is  to  say,  with  the 
modern  use  to  be  made  of  the  material  gathered  and 
arranged  in  the  first  part.     It  will  be  well  to  keep  these 


68    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

two  aspects  of  the  educational  study  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment separate  from  each  other. 


THE  EDUCATIONAL  STUDY  OF  THE  NEW 
TESTAMENT 

Even  a  rapid  survey  of  the  various  parts  of  the  New 
Testament  with  the  Herbartian  '  formal  steps  '  in  mind, 
will  reveal  at  once  how  naturally  its  material  falls  into 
psychological  and  educational  categories.  And  a  merely 
formal  educational  arrangement  of  the  New  Testament 
thus  suggested  will  not  be  without  its  value  for  the  practical 
work  of  teaching.  It  will  not,  however,  carry  us  very  far, 
and  in  order  to  bring  out  the  full  significance  of  the 
material  before  us  we  shall  need  a  more  radical  regrouping. 

We  must  think  rather  of  the  different  types  of  educa- 
tional forces  at  our  disposal  in  the  New  Testament,  namely, 
its  historical  incidents,  its  ideas,  its  distinctive  types  of 
thought  and  its  personalities.  It  is  the  business  of  the 
teacher  to  use  each  and  all  of  these  to  set  up  an  effective 
educational  process  in  the  mind  and  life  of  his  pupils. 

Now  the  essential  elements  which  make  up  the  general 
apparatus  of  education  maybe  reduced  to  three,  and  every 
educational  process  implies  a  constant  interaction  between 
them. 

In  the  first  place,  every  new  educational  activity  starts 
from  some  actual  situation  in  life  as  it  is. 

Secondly,  it  is  the  intention  of  every  educational 
process  to  change  that  situation  into  some  corresponding 
ideal. 

Thirdly,  the  educator  brings,  according  to  his  oppor- 
tunities, some  definite  influences,  powers  and  motives  to 
bear  upon  the  actual  situation  in  order  to  produce  the  ideal 
he  has  in  mind. 

The  Main  Elements  in  the  Educational  Process 

That  means  to  say  that  the  teacher,  in  the  general 
educative  process  as  a  whole  and  in  each  particular  part 


THE  EDUCATIONAL  INTERPRETATION  69 

of  it,  must  have  before  him  some  actual  human  situation 
which  he  desires  to  change  in  the  direction  of  some  ideal 
in  which  he  believes,  by  means  of  some  influences  which 
he  can  organize  and  use  for  that  purpose. 

It  is  evident,  therefore,  that  in  order  to  make  a  full 
educational  study  of  the  New  Testament,  we  must  proceed 
to  analyse  every  incident,  every  idea,  every  type  of 
thought,  every  personality  and  every  book  in  the  New 
Testament  in  such  a  way  as  to  make  plain  to  ourselves 
the  nature  of  the  human  situation,  the  moral  and  spiritual 
ideal  and  the  kind  of  motive-power  that  are  involved  in  it. 

Naturally,  with  regard  to  a  great  many  of  the  details 
of  the  New  Testament,  no  very  clear  or  satisfactory 
results  can  be  expected  from  such  an  analysis.  Their 
independent  value  is  but  slight,  and  it  is  only  indirectly 
as  part  of  a  larger  whole  that  they  acquire  any  educational 
significance.  Even  that,  however,  it  is  well  for  the 
teacher  to  realize.  It  will  help  him  to  avoid  the  degrading 
'  homiletic  '  method  of  trying  to  squeeze  a  sermon  or  a 
lesson  by  ingenuity  out  of  unimportant  sayings  or  passages 
where  neither  sermon  nor  lesson  is  naturally  to  be  found. 

Ideals  and  their  Realization 

Such  questions,  however,  become  more  and  more 
applicable  and  appropriate  with  every  step  as  we  ascend 
from  the  particular  incidents  and  ideas  to  the  person- 
alities revealed  in  the  New  Testament.  When  we  reach 
such  personalities  as  Paul  or  Jesus,  these  questions  lead 
us  to  the  innermost  secrets  of  the  New  Testament,  and 
they  become  the  only  questions  which  are  capable  of 
bringing  us  face  to  face  with  its  heart  and  soul.  What 
did  these  men  really  want  to  do  ?  What  was  the  actual 
situation  faced  by  them  ?  What  kind  of  ideal  did  they 
hold  before  men  ?  By  what  means  do  they  attempt  to 
move  men  in  its  direction  ?  How  exactly  do  they  try 
to  help  men  ?     To  what  motives  do  they  appeal  ? 

These  are,  after  all,  the  vital  questions  with  regard 
to  any  personality  and  especially  the  great  dominating 
personalities  of  history. 

It  is  something  of  this  kind  that  is  meant  when  we 


70    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

speak  of  the  educational  study  of  the  New  Testament, 
and  it  will  be  seen  that  we  are  dealing  almost  entirely 
not  with  the  external  form  or  origin  of  the  writings,  but 
with  their  historical  and  intellectual  content.  This  is 
not  an  arbitrary  handling  of  the  New  Testament  such  as 
the  old  '  homiletic  '  method  very  largely  involved,  nor  is 
it  independent  of  the  scientific,  historical  and  literary 
method  of  interpretation.  It  is  definitely  built  upon  the 
work  of  the  historian  and  literary  critic,  and  takes  their 
results  for  granted.  All  questions  of  text,  authorship, 
date,  authenticity,  historical  value,  literary  form  and 
even  questions  of  exegesis  in  detail  are  already  considered 
and  judged  before  such  a  study  can  fruitfully  begin.  It 
is,  moreover,  itself  in  the  first  place  a  purely  scientific 
historical  study — being  only  an  attempt  to  describe  the 
actual  facts  with  regard  to  the  New  Testament  and  its 
writers.  The  use  that  may  afterwards  be  made  of  the 
results  of  such  a  study  by  the  modern  Christian  teacher 
and  their  value  for  his  task  to-day  is  a  different  matter 
altogether,  which  ought  to  be  sharply  distinguished  from 
the  historical  study  itself.  We  must  shoulder  the  responsi- 
bility for  the  use  we  make  of  the  material  it  provides, 
and  must  justify  that  use  to  ourselves  and  others  at 
every  step. 

3 

ILLUSTRATIONS  AND  EXAMPLES 

Let  us  see,  then,  exactly  what  is  involved  in  a  study 
of  the  material  of  the  New  Testament  from  this  point  of 
view,  and  what  kind  of  results  we  may  expect  from  it. 
Here,  of  course,  we  can  only  take  one  or  two  examples 
from  the  very  varied  and  rich  contents  of  the  New 
Testament . 

Educational  Study  of  the  Parousia 

One  of  the  most  prominent  ideas  in  almost  every  part 
of  the  New  Testament  is  that  of  the  Parousia,  or  what  is 
usually  called  the  Second  Coming  of  Christ.     On  the  basis 


THE  EDUCATIONAL  INTERPRETATION  71 

of  all  that  modern  literary  and  historical  criticism  has 
told  us  about  the  history  and  different  forms  taken  by 
this  idea  in  the  New  Testament,  what  we  particularly 
wish  to  know  with  regard  to  it  is  its  educational  value 
for  the  life,  practical  work  and  teaching  of  the  first 
Christian  teachers  and  preachers  of  the  Christian  Gospel. 
We  are  not  at  present  concerned  with  its  place  and  value 
in  any  modern  Christian  instruction. 

To  get  what  we  want,  we  have  to  address  our  three 
series  of  questions  to  this  idea  or  belief  : 

1 .  What  kind  of  ideal  of  life — personal  or  social,  moral 
or  religious — does  this  belief  imply,  embody  or  encourage  ? 

How  is  it  related  to  other  aspects  of  the  Christian 
hope  and  of  the  Christian  ideal  found  in  the  New  Testa- 
ment, as,  for  example,  the  Last  Judgment,  the  Resurrec- 
tion, the  Kingdom  of  God,  etc.  ? 

Does  this  belief  stand  at  the  centre  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment conception  of  the  ideal,  or  only  on  its  circumference  ? 

Has  it  grown  naturally  out  of  the  life  of  the  Christian 
Gospel,  or  is  it  only  a  foreign  element  brought  into 
Christian  thought  and  life  from  elsewhere  ? 

Having  asked  these  and  similar  questions  with  regard 
to  the  type  and  ideal  of  life  implied  and  encouraged  by 
this  belief  in  the  Second  Coming,  we  come  next  to  a  series 
of  questions  concerning  the  way  in  which  the  idea  is  used 
in  the  New  Testament  : 

2.  Upon  what  kind  of  situation  and  circumstances  is 
it  brought  to  bear  in  the  different  writings  of  the  New 
Testament  ? 

For  what  special  purpose  do  the  different  writers  use 
it? 

3.  What  is  the  nature  and  value  of  the  appeal  it  makes  ? 
How  far  is  that  appeal  consistent  with  the  central 

motives  of  the  Christian  Gospel  ? 

What  moral  interests  is  it  used  to  protect  ? 

What  kind  of  help  does  it  give  to  a  man  like  Paul  to 
realize  the  Christian  faith  and  life  ? 

In  what  special  ways  does  he  and  the  other  writers  of 
the  New  Testament  use  the  belief  in  order  to  help  their 
readers  ? 

Is  it  used  mainly  as  an  inspiration  to  renewed  moral 


72    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

activity,  or  as  a  protection  against  forces  hostile  to  faith, 
or  as  a  comfort  amidst  evil  circumstances  ? 

Even  to  suggest  the  answer  to  such  questions  would 
lead  us  far  beyond  our  limits.  It  would  lead  to  a  dis- 
cussion of  the  conception  of  Messiahship  entertained  by 
Jesus,  of  the  place  and  value  of  the  Eschatology  of  the 
Gospels,  of  the  meaning  and  use  of  the  title  '  Son  of  Man,' 
of  the  different  main  forms  taken  by  the  idea  of  the 
Second  Coming  in  the  Primitive  Church,  in  Paul  and  in 
John,  of  the  way  in  which  the  early  Christians  generally 
threw  most  of  their  faith  and  hope  into  this  particular 
form,  and  a  multitude  of  other  questions. 

The  Parousia  in  the  New  Testament 

The  belief  does  not  stand  by  itself  in  the  New  Testa- 
ment, but  is  intimately  connected  with  and  a  central 
element  in  the  whole  '  other-worldly,'  eschatological 
conception  of  life  which  dominates  so  much  of  the 
thoughts  and  activities  of  the  early  Christians,  and  which 
is  represented  in  the  apocalyptic  drama  of  the  Resur- 
rection, the  Last  Judgment,  the  Messianic  reign  in  the 
*  world  to  come,'  It  was,  however,  the  most  living 
element  in  that  drama,  and  it  succeeded  in  giving  new 
life  to  the  dead  Messianic  formute  of  Judaism  because 
it  was  the  Parousia  of  Jesus  that  was  expected.  It  was 
especially  one  of  the  many  forms  in  which  was  expressed 
the  supreme  significance  of  Jesus  and  the  fact  that  all 
Christian  hopes  were  centred  in  Him  as  the  final  victor 
over  sin,  Satan  and  death.  In  essence,  therefore,  it  stood 
at  the  centre  of  the  Christian  faith,  though  in  its  pictorial 
form  it  was  a  belief  borrowed  bodily  from  Judaism.  It 
is  evident,  however,  that  as  an  external  eschatological 
form  it  soon  became  a  danger  to  the  Church,  and  John  felt 
that  it  stood  in  need  of  being  spiritualized  and  moralized 
before  it  could  remain  the  permanent  possession  of  the 
Church  and  Christian  life.  The  value  which  it  implies 
for  a  man  like  Paul  is  the  supreme  Christian  ideal,  but  its 
form  encouraged  and  embodied  a  strained  '  other-worldly  ' 
and  dualistic  type  of  piety,  tending  to  turn  men's  thoughts 
away  from  the  tasks  of  the  present,  as  it  did  among  the 


THE  EDUCATIONAL  INTERPRETATION  73 

Thessalonians.  The  author  of  the  Fourth  Gospel  was 
therefore  led  to  substitute  for  it  the  belief  in  the  abiding 
presence  of  Jesus  with  His  disciples. 

On  the  other  hand,  it  has  been  claimed  that  "  the 
social  side  of  Christianity  is,  as  it  were,  masked  under  the 
idea  of  the  Parousia.  It  is  masked  but  also  conserved  ; 
for  so  long  as  the  idea  of  the  Parousia  remained,  there 
was  no  fear  that  acquiescence  in  the  present  evil  order 
would  react  hurtfully  upon  Christian  faith  and  morality. 
Had  it  not  been  for  the  Parousia  hope,  the  Early  Church 
might  have  been  prematurely  hurled  against  the  Empire 
as  a  revolutionary  force,  or  through  enforced  acquiescence 
in  its  evils  have  become  a  merely  pietistic  association,  a 
new  Essenism  on  a  larger  scale."  ^  That  means  to  say 
that  the  belief  in  the  Parousia  played  the  same  part  in 
early  Christianity  which  the  doctrine  of  the  inevitable 
Class  War  and  the  doctrine  of  the  catastrophic  Social 
Revolution  have  played  in  the  history  of  modern 
Socialism. 

Value  of  the  Idea  of  the  Parousia 

The  actual  situations  upon  which  the  belief  is  brought 
to  bear  range  from  the  unbelief  of  the  Jews,  both  at  the 
trial  of  Jesus  and  in  the  early  history  of  the  Church  at 
Jerusalem,  to  the  despair  of  the  Christian  disciples  when 
face  to  face  with  persecution  in  the  Apocalypse  and  else- 
where. In  both  cases  an  appeal  is  made  to  the  Parousia 
of  Jesus  as  the  full  justification  of  Christian  faith  and  the 
full  revelation  of  its  truth.  In  its  name  defiance  is  hurled 
at  the  strongest  enemies,  and  they  are  dared  to  do  their 
worst . 

It  is  plain  that  there  was  no  appeal  which  gripped  the 
early  Christians  in  general  more  strongly  than  the  appeal 
to  the  Parousia.  Its  basis  was  the  Jewish  doctrine  of 
Retribution.  It  meant  the  punishment  of  the  evil- 
doer and  the  reward  of  the  righteous.  But  in  Paul  and 
the  other  great  figures  the  belief  takes  an  ever  higher  and 
more   spiritual   form.     Paul   learnt   later   to   inspire   and 

^  Quoted  in  Fairweather,  The  Background  of  the  Gospels,  p.  307 ;  from  Cairns, 
Christianity  in  the  Modern  World. 


74    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

comfort  himself  with  the  hope  of  a  full  and  perfect  com- 
munion with  the  Lord  after  death  rather  than  that  of  the 
Lord's  visible  presence  on  earth  ;  and  in  the  end  the 
Parousia  becomes  the  symbol  of  a  kingdom  of  spiritual 
glory  ruled  by  Christ  and  God — the  guarantee  of  the  full 
possession  of  which  is  already  present  in  the  power  and 
influence  of  the  Spirit. 

We  have,  therefore,  in  the  New  Testament  Parousia 
an  idea  which  covers  almost  all  the  forms  of  the  early 
Christian  ideal — from  the  crudest  Jewish  eschatology  up 
to  the  Pauline  identification  of  the  Spirit  of  Christ  with 
the  Holy  Spirit  and  to  the  Johannine  identification  of  the 
Spirit  with  the  Advocate.  It  is  used  in  practice  as  the 
strongest  inspiration  to  Christian  moral  activity,  as  a 
comfort  in  evil  circumstances  of  all  kinds,  and  it  served  to 
protect  for  the  time  being  the  supreme  value  of  Jesus 
Christ  ;  while  continually  in  its  cruder  forms  it  tended  to 
encourage  a  strained,  ecstatic,  unbalanced  type  of  piety, 
and  at  the  same  time  a  legal  conception  of  God's  relation 
to  men — both  of  which  were  only  sub-Christian  in  character 
and  value. 

These  are  some  of  the  lines  upon  which  our  practical, 
ethical  and  educational  study  with  regard  to  such  an 
idea  as  the  Parousia  must  proceed.  The  facts  which 
emerge  from  such  a  study  are  those  which  the  teacher  of 
the  New  Testament  must  bear  in  mind  when  he  comes  to 
consider  the  question  of  the  place  and  value  of  the  whole 
eschatological  world  of  the  New  Testament  for  his  present- 
day  task  of  making  Christians. 


4 
RESULTS  OF  THE  STUDY 

The  Variety  of  the  New  Testament 

When  the  New  Testament  is  studied  from  the  point 
of  view  and  for  the  purpose  suggested  in  the  preceding 
section,  we  get  an  almost  bewildering  impression  of  the 
wealth  and  variety  of  the  interests  and  motives  to  which 


THE  EDUCATIONAL  INTERPRETATION  75 

the  first  Christian  teachers  appealed  on  behalf  of  their 
Gospel,  We  find  ourselves  in  an  armoury  full  of  the 
weapons  of  Christian  warfare  in  almost  endless  variety. 
In  how  many  different  ways,  for  instance,  do  the  writers 
express  what  the  Gospel  brings  to  men  ;  what  various 
ways  they  have  of  describing  the  Christian  ideal  of  life. 
Now  it  is  the  Kingdom  of  God  ;  now  Sonship  to  God 
the  Father  ;  again  it  is  union  with  Christ,  and  then  life 
in  the  Spirit  ;  now  it  is  communion  with  God,  then  the 
perfect  life  and  again  the  life  of  love.  It  is  forgiveness 
of  sins,  justification  by  faith,  eternal  life,  the  Cross,  the 
Resurrection,  reconciliation  or  peace  with  God  and  love 
towards  God  and  the  neighbour. 

The  motives  and  interests  appealed  to,  the  powers 
called  upon  on  behalf  of  the  ideal,  are  even  more  various 
in  character  than  are  the  forms  in  which  the  ideal  itself 
is  expressed.  Now  they  are  almost  crudely  utilitarian 
and  then  they  are  purely  spiritual.  Now  they  are 
eschatological  and  then  they  are  moral.  They  range 
from  earthly  prosperity  and  misfortune  through  heaven 
and  hell  to  faith  and  hope  and  love. 

The  many  forms  in  which  the  ideal  and  its  different 
values  and  aspects  are  described  are  nowhere  reduced  to 
any  recognizable  system  or  unity.  We  find  them  there 
in  the  different  writers,  simply  placed  side  by  side  as 
actually  used  on  different  occasions.  Sometimes  the 
different  forms  are  inconsistent  with  each  other  even  in 
the  same  writer.  Sometimes  also  the  ideal  itself  and  the 
means  employed  to  enforce  it  seem  to  us  inconsistent 
with  each  other.  Their  untold  wealth,  however,  and 
their  almost  endless  variety  when  studied  as  they  were 
actually  used  in  the  first  and  most  heroic  attempt  ever 
made  on  behalf  of  the  Gospel,  become  a  supreme  object- 
lesson  for  the  Christian  teacher. 

It  is  for  us  to  decide  how  far  the  material  thus  used 
in  the  first  century  still  holds  good  for  the  Christian 
education  of  the  youth  and  children  of  to-day.  They 
are  not  of  necessity  the  only  means  nor  of  necessity  the 
best  means  for  twentieth-century  teachers  to  employ  in 
order  to  effect  the  same  purpose.  It  was  certainly  only 
for  the  men  and  women  of  the  first   century  that   the 


76    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

material  of  the  New  Testament  was  created  or  borrowed 
and  used.  It  was  not  written  at  all  for  children,  and 
neither  Jesus  nor  Paul  was  dreaming  of  a  period  of  recon- 
struction after  a  great  and  disastrous  European  war. 

A  Gift  and  a  Demand 

If  one  were  allowed  to  voice  in  a  few  words  the  first 
message  of  the  New  Testament  to  us  as  Christian  teachers, 
it  would  be  in  some  such  terms  as  the  following  : 

"  These  are  the  various  forms  in  which  the  Christian 
Gospel,  ideals  and  values  were  preached  and  taught  when 
they  first  appeared,  not  systematically  arranged,  but 
simply  side  by  side.  This  is  human  nature,  this  is  human 
need  as  the  first  Christian  teachers  saw  them  ;  these  are 
the  special  conditions  and  needs  which  they  tried  to  meet. 
These  are  the  ways  in  which  they  met  them  ;  these  are 
the  methods  they  used  ;  these  are  the  motives  and 
interests,  the  instruments  they  employed  in  their  appeal 
when  trying  to  change  the  men  and  the  conditions  in  the 
direction  of  the  ideal  life  of  the  Gospel.  Once  more  they 
are  not  systematically  arranged.  They  are  not  always 
consistent  with  each  other,  but  they  are  here  as  they 
were  actually  used  by  very  different  men  in  very  different 
circumstances. 

"  It  is  now  left  to  you  to  show  that  this  ideal  or  Gospel, 
thus  described,  is  still  the  ideal  or  Gospel  for  the  twentieth 
century,  and  whether  it  can  be  so  in  any  or  all  of  its 
New  Testament  forms  or  not. 

"It  is  left  to  you  to  obtain  such  accurate  knowledge 
of  the  men,  women  and  children,  the  conditions  and  needs 
of  your  time,  that  you  will  be  able  to  show  how  they  are 
different  or  similar  to  those  of  the  New  Testament,  and 
so  adapt  your  teaching  to  those  similarities  or  differences. 

"  It  is  left  to  you,  finally,  to  show  how  far  the  means 
and  motives  used  in  the  New  Testament  are  still  effective 
in  changing  your  conditions  and  your  men,  women  and 
children  in  the  direction  of  the  Christian  ideal." 

So  may  be  described  the  first  free  gift  of  the  New 
Testament  to  the  modern  Christian  teacher,  and  such 
are  its  imperative  demands  upon  him. 


THE  EDUCATIONAL  INTERPRETATION  77 


Educational  Value  of  the  Variety 

The  kind  of  study  that  has  been  suggested,  one  may 
venture  to  call  a  more  practical  and  educational  inter- 
pretation of  the  contents  of  the  New  Testament  than 
the  ordinary  methods  provide.  Even  the  first-fruits  of 
such  a  study  may  be  of  direct  use  for  the  Christian  teacher 
in  his  work,  quite  apart  from  any  systematic  valuation 
of  them  in  relation  to  definite  modern  needs. 

Many  of  our  lessons  and  of  our  sermons  should  be 
devoted  simply  and  solely  to  an  objective  transmission 
of  the  direct  results  of  such  a  reading  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment. Especially  in  our  raw  youth,  when  we  have  not 
very  much  direct  personal  Christian  experience  to  fall 
back  upon,  such  a  practice  would  be  refreshing  both  for 
teacher  and  pupil,  for  the  preacher  and  his  people.  In 
any  case,  in  these  days,  it  is  very  necessary  work.  When 
we  feel,  as  we  must  often  do,  that  we  have  no  very  urgent 
personal  message  of  our  own  to  give,  the  most  effective 
substitute  is  to  put  up  another  man  to  deliver  his  message 
in  his  own  way  through  us.  Such  objective  teaching  and 
preaching,  deliberately  and  openly  undertaken,  would  save 
us  from  a  good  deal  of  compulsory  hypocrisy. 

Quite  apart  from  its  personal  advantage,  however, 
such  a  method  enables  us  to  show  in  an  objective  way, 
without  any  polemic,  that  in  the  actual  Scriptures  them- 
selves, different  and  sometimes  inconsistent  views  of  the 
Christian  aim  and  ideal,  as  well  as  very  different  methods 
of  reaching  them,  stand  side  by  side.  There  is  no  more 
effective  and  yet  unobjectionable  way  not  only  of  teaching 
the  methods  and  results  of  modern  Biblical  Criticism,  but 
also  of  inculcating  the  spirit  of  tolerance,  than  by  objective 
descriptions  of  this  kind.  There  might  be  given,  for 
instance,  objective  pictures  of  Peter  and  Paul — ^with  their 
different  aims  and  methods,  appealing  to  different  motives 
and  interests — yet  both  of  them  prominent  disciples  of 
Jesus.  Or  with  equal  effect  one  might  give  a  practical 
interpretation  of  the  Gospel  of  Mark,  and  side  by  side 
with  it  of  the  Fourth  Gospel  ;  or,  of  the  Epistle  to  the 
Galatians  side  by  side  with  the  Epistle  to  the  Hebrews, 


78    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

comparing  and  contrasting  them  in  their  aims  and  ideals, 
in  their  methods  and  means. 

The  rich  variety,  therefore,  of  the  New  Testament 
and  even  its  inconsistencies  have  an  independent  educa- 
tional significance  and  value  of  their  own  which  should 
not  be  neglected. 

It  is  impossible,  however,  for  the  teacher  to  rest 
content  in  this  variety,  however  rich  it  may  be.  It 
becomes  inevitably  a  part  of  his  educational  task  to 
inquire  whether  there  is  any  possibility  of  reducing  this 
variety  into  some  kind  of  unity — to  classify  and  harness 
the  varied  ideals,  interests  and  motives  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment in  the  service  of  a  supreme  end.  If  so,  what  is  the 
nature  of  that  unity  ?  It  has  already  become  abundantly 
evident  that  there  is  in  the  writings  themselves  no  ready- 
made  or  mechanical  unity.  This  question  will  come  before 
us  again  in  another  form.  Here  we  only  note  that  once 
more  the  New  Testament  leaves  us  face  to  face  with  a 
great  demand.  Out  of  its  varied  material  we  must  get 
a  clear  picture  of  what  the  one  Christian  Gospel  was 
at  first,  and  of  the  manner  in  which  it  was  in  very  varied 
forms  and  degrees  incorporated  in  the  life  of  the  first 
century.  It  leaves  us  also  with  the  imperative  task  of 
showing  that  that  Gospel  or  one  Christian  end  still  remains 
the  living  Gospel  for  our  time  and  needs.  It  leaves  us 
also  with  the  task  of  actually  applying  that  Gospel  to 
the  details  of  our  personal  and  social  life  to-day.  It  is 
our  business,  that  is,  to  show  that  the  practical  acknow- 
ledgment of  the  redeeming  God  in  Christ  does  solve  for 
us  the  problems  of  life  and  the  world. 

For  Books  see  Chapter  V. 


CHAPTER  V 

THE   MODERN    USE   OF  THE   NEW   TESTAMENT 

1.  Introductory. — Two  Series  of  Questions — Historical  Documents  and 

Modern  Needs — Application  of  the  Gospel  Essential. 

2.  Modern  Valuation  of  New  Testament  in  Detail. — The  Resurrection, 

its  Forms  and  Meaning  in  the  New  Testament — Its  Educational 
Problems — Modern  Substitutes — Heaven  and  Hell. 

3.  '  Translation  '  of  New  Testament  for  Modern  Use. — The  Universal 

Language  of  the  New  Testament — Terms  and  Ideas  almost 
Impossible  to  '  Translate  ' — Paul  and  Jesus  in  Modern  Educa- 
tion— Descriptions  of  Jesus — Homiletic  v.  Scientific  Exegesis. 

4.  Limitations  to  the  Modern  Use  of  the  New  Testament. — Three  Examples 

— The  New  Testament  and  a  System  of  Ideals — Need  of  Con- 
sistent Teaching — Unity  of  New  Testament  in  the  Personality 
of  Jesus — No  Systematic  Analysis  of  His  Values — Hence  In- 
evitable Variety  of  Interpretation. 

5.  The  Teacher's  Knowledge  of  the  Modern  World. — The  Teacher  and 

Human  Nature — The  New  Testament  and  its  World — Study  of 
Modern  Men  and  their  Conditions. 

6.  The   Modern  Application   of   the   Gospel. — The   Real   Task   of   the 

Teacher — The  Gaps  in  the  New  Testament — The  Church  and  the 
World. 

7.  The  Social  Contribution  of  the  New  Testament. — The  Social  Message 

of  the  New  Testament — Its  Spirit,  Attitude  and  Principles — 
The  Demand  of  the  New  Testament. 


I 

INTRODUCTORY 

So  far  our  treatment  of  the  New  Testament,  from  an 
educational  point  of  view,  has  been  concerned,  on  the  one 
hand,  with  an  historical  study  of  its  material  as  it  met 
the  needs  of  its  own  time  and  its  first  readers,  providing 
them  with  the  Christian  ideal  in  many  varied  forms  and 


8o    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

aspects,  and  with  whatever  helps  and  motive-power  they 
seemed  to  need  in  their  actual  situation  in  order  to  move 
in  its  direction.  On  the  other  hand,  a  general  valuation 
of  its  content  and  form  has  been  suggested  which  revealed 
its  fundamental  features  and  qualities  for  the  purpose 
of  educative  instruction,  and  which  also  emphasized  in 
particular  its  peculiar  adaptability  to  the  needs,  capacities 
and  interests  of  Adolescence. 

In  order,  however,  to  apply  the  material  thus  collected 
and  the  views  thus  suggested  in  the  practical  teaching 
of  the  New  Testament,  the  modern  educator  must  be 
prepared  to  carry  the  discussion  one  or  two  steps  further. 
The  issues  of  education  are,  after  all,  the  living  issues  of 
the  present  and  the  future,  and  however  fitted  the  New 
Testament  may  have  been  to  supply  the  moral  and  religious 
educational  needs  of  its  own  time  and  people,  and  however 
adapted  its  type  of  material  in  general  may  be  for  the 
human  adolescent,  it  does  not  necessarily  follow  that  all 
its  ideas,  ideals,  motives  and  helps  have  the  same  value 
for  the  twentieth  century  as  they  had  for  the  first.  Nor 
does  it  follow  that  because  the  New  Testament  is  fitted 
to  supply  the  general  and  universal  needs  of  youth,  it 
is  also  capable  of  solving  all  the  particular  and  special 
problems  of  the  youth  of  the  twentieth  century  in  their 
peculiar  modern  forms — personal  and  social. 

Two  Series  of  Questions 

The  fact  is,  as  we  have  seen,  that  the  New  Testament 
comes  to  the  teacher  every  time  with  a  gift  in  one  hand 
and  a  demand  in  the  other.  If  it  shows  us  the  first  great 
attempt  to  interpret  and  apply  the  Christian  Gospel  to  a 
definite  historical  set  of  circumstances,  it  is  at  the  same 
time  and  by  its  very  nature  a  call  upon  us  to  face  the 
inevitable  question  as  to  how  this  material  is  fitted  to  do 
the  same  work  for  our  time.  We  must  find  out  how  far 
it  will  be  effective  for  the  Christian  teacher  to  put  our 
Christian  experience,  our  Christian  ideal  and  our  appeal 
on  its  behalf  into  the  forms  and  terms  of  the  New 
Testament. 

Before  he  can  use  the  New  Testament,  therefore,  with 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT       8i 

any  confidence,  the  teacher  must  ask  himself  these  two 
series  of  questions  : 

(a)  Have  the  particular  events,  ideas,  books  and 
personalities  of  the  New  Testament  the  same  moral 
educational  value  to-day  as  they  had  in  the  first  century  ? 
Can  they  be  used  as  confidently  in  the  same  way  and  for 
the  same  purpose  ?  Can  they  be  used  in  the  same  form  ? 
If  not,  how  much  of  what  we  may  call  '  translation  '  do 
they  need  in  order  to  make  them  effective  for  our  modern 
purposes  ? 

(b)  Does  the  New  Testament  as  a  whole  supply  us 
with  all  the  material  that  we  need  in  order  to  present  a 
satisfactory  and  adequate  moral  and  religious  ideal  in  a 
satisfactory  form,  with  adequate  motive-power  for  en- 
forcing it  and  with  satisfactory  guidance  for  applying  it 
in  and  through  the  circumstances  of  our  time  ?  Or  are 
there  any  important  gaps  and  defects  in  the  New  Testa- 
ment material  from  this  point  of  view  ?  In  other  words, 
what  exactly  are  the  limitations  to  the  value  and  use  of 
the  New  Testament  for  modern  life  ? 

Here,  of  course,  nothing  like  a  full  discussion  of  such 
questions  can  even  be  attempted,  and  we  must  be  satis- 
fied with  suggesting  the  various  kinds  of  problems  they 
involve.  Two  preliminary  observations  will  help  us  to 
approach  them  in  the  right  way  and  the  right  spirit. 


The  New  Testament  and  Modern  Needs 

I.  A  great  deal  depends  upon  whether  we  begin  the 
discussion  from  the  New  Testament  end,  or  from  our 
experience  of  the  actual  needs  of  the  present  day.  Some- 
thing may  be  said  for  both  methods.  On  the  one  hand, 
in  moral  and  religious  instruction  (as  is  the  case  also 
with  regard  to  secular  instruction)  we  have  entered  into 
a  long  historical  tradition  which  gives  the  Bible  the 
central,  if  not  an  all-sufficing,  place  in  the  curriculum. 
On  the  other  hand,  both  religion  and  education,  we 
repeat,  are  nothing  if  they  are  not  answers  to  actual 
living  needs.  To  provide  these  answers  effectively,  we 
must  in  the  end  be  free  to  choose  as  our  educational 
6 


82    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

material  the  very  best  the  world  can  offer  in  the  Bible 
or  out  of  it. 

Occasionally  these  two  points  of  view  might  naturally 
give  us  a  different  vision,  but  after  our  preliminary  general 
valuation  of  the  New  Testament  we  may  be  justified 
in  thinking  that  it  is  possible  in  the  end  to  do  justice  to 
both  at  the  same  time.  There  must,  however,  be  the 
constant  reservation  that  where  actual  and  imperative 
human  need  does  come  into  serious  conflict  with  the 
Biblical  tradition,  or  with  the  New  Testament  itself,  the 
latter  must  inevitably  give  way. 

The  Practical  Application  Essential  to  the 
Gospel 

2.  Another  preliminary  observation  that  must  be 
made  is  that  what  we  have  in  the  material  of  the  New 
Testament  is  not  Christian  principle  or  Christian  ideal  or 
Christian  motive-power  pure  and  simple — that  is,  in  a 
permanent  and  universal  form — but  these  always  in  some 
temporary  historical  form.  Sometimes  there  may  be 
an  admixture  of  foreign  sub-Christian  or  non-Christian 
elements  ;  and  always  the  principle,  ideal  or  motive 
is  found  in  a  form  applicable  to  the  need  of  the  first 
century,  and  so  more  or  less  clothed  in  a  first-century 
garb. 

Our  definite  task  as  teachers  of  the  New  Testament, 
therefore,  is  to  strip  the  Christian  Gospel,  wherever  that 
may  be  necessary,  of  its  original  historical  garments  and 
redress  it  in  those  of  our  own  time.  In  every  case  what  we 
must  ask  is.  Does  this  New  Testament  idea,  ideal  or  motive 
require  any  special  adjustment  to  the  language  or  needs 
or  interests  of  our  modern  men,  women  or  children  ?  For 
instance,  a  principle  which  we  have  succeeded  in  picking 
out  of  the  circumstances  of  the  New  Testament  may  in 
itself  be  available  or  adequate  for  our  use,  but  the  special 
application  made  of  it  to  some  actual  situation  in  the  New 
Testament  may  be  more  or  less  out  of  date  or  useless. 
That  is  the  case  with  many  of  the  concrete  applications 
made  by  Paul  in  the  first  letter  to  the  Corinthians  {e.g.  the 
meat  offered  to  idols).     Our  duty  as  teachers  then  will  be. 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT       83 

as  it  were,  to  squeeze  the  moral  principle  out  of  the  original 
situation  and  to  find  some  way  of  reapplying  it  to  the 
new  situation  actually  before  us. 

It  needs  to  be  emphasized  that  this  whole  process  of 
application  and  reapphcation  is  necessary  to  the  Gospel 
and  to  our  teaching.  Because  we  can  and  do  distinguish 
between  the  essential  Christian  Gospel  and  its  variable 
practical  consequences,  we  are  sometimes  tempted  to 
think  that  we  can  and  ought  to  confine  our  preaching 
and  instruction  to  this  essence.  But  the  application 
itself,  though  it  may  vary  from  age  to  age,  and  even  from 
person  to  person,  is  also  absolutely  necessary  to  the  life 
and  growth  of  the  Gospel.  We  never  actually  find  the 
pure  or  simple  Gospel  except  in  and  through  some  definite 
application  of  its  principle.  The  application  we  need, 
however,  can  seldom  if  ever  be  a  mere  transference  of  the 
New  Testament  application  to  our  time.  That  is  why, 
consciously  or  unconsciously,  we  must  always  carry 
through  the  complete  process  of  unclothing  the  Gospel 
of  its  first-century  dress  and  then  reclothe  it  in  new 
garments  in  every  age. 

2 

THE  MODERN  VALUATION  OF  THE  NEW 
TESTAMENT 

With  this  introduction  we  proceed  to  the  discussion 
of  our  two  series  of  questions. 

The  first  series  involves  two  somewhat  different  kinds 
of  educational  problems.  One  is  concerned  with  the 
modern  valuation  of  each  particular  incident,  idea,  ideal, 
motive,  book  and  personality  of  the  New  Testament  for 
educational  purposes  ;  while  the  other  discusses  the 
amount  of  '  translation  '  they  may  need  in  form  and 
expression  in  order  that  that  value  may  become  effective 
in  instruction. 

The  Resurrection  in  the  New  Testament 

Take,  for  instance,  the  belief  in  the  Resurrection  as 
it  is  found  in  the  New  Testament.     It  is  evident  that  this 


84    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

belief  had  a  very  significant  value  for  Primitive  Christi- 
anity. It  is  one  of  the  main  forms  in  which  the  early 
Christians  expressed  the  Christian  ideal,  and  it  is  also 
used  extensively,  both  as  motive  and  consolation,  by 
their  teachers.  The  Resurrection  of  Jesus  especially  was 
the  occasion  if  not  the  cause  of  the  rapid  spread  of  Christi- 
anity ;  and  early  Christian  teaching  and  preaching  was 
largely  based  upon  it  in  some  form  or  other.  It  certainly 
made  a  very  strong  and  effective  appeal  to  the  men  of  the 
first  century. 

The  question  we  now  definitely  raise  is,  What  is  its 
value  and  place  in  the  spread  of  the  Christian  Gospel  or 
the  growth  of  Christian  character  to-day  ?  Can  we  appeal 
to  it  in  the  same  form,  for  the  same  purpose  and  with  the 
same  effect  as  the  first  Christian  teachers  and  preachers 
did  ?  Will  it  appeal  in  the  same  form  to  children  of  ten 
as  it  will  to  youths  of  eighteen,  or  women  of  thirty,  or  men 
of  fifty  ? 

If  we  come  to  the  conclusion,  as  every  Christian  teacher 
probably  will,  that  the  essential  faith  in  the  reality  of  the 
eternal  life  and  its  conquest  over  death — a  faith  which 
does  lie  behind  the  belief  in  the  Resurrection — still  re- 
presents one  of  the  significant  values  we  desire  to  pre- 
serve and  increase,  we  are  still  left  with  the  further 
problem  of  finding  the  most  fitting  and  effective  form 
through  which  to  create  and  stimulate  that  faith. 

Educational  Problems  Involved 

The  faith  is  found  in  many  different  forms  in  the  New 
Testament.  Now  it  is  the  empty  tomb  of  Jesus  ;  now 
His  bodily  resurrection  ;  now  it  is  expressed  in  visions 
of  the  Risen  Jesus  and  now  in  the  '  spiritual  body  '  of 
Paul.  Now  it  is  a  part  of  the  eschatological  drama  of  the 
end,  and  so  a  future  hope  ;  and  again  it  is  the  '  eternal  life  * 
of  John,  and  so  a  present  spiritual  reality.  Now  it  is  the 
moral  impression  made  by  the  character  and  personality 
of  Jesus,  and  then  the  present  influence  of  the  Holy  Spirit 
is  its  earnest  and  pledge.  There  are  also  other  different 
expressions  of  what  is  essentially  the  same  faith. 

Are  all  of  these  forms  of  equal  value  to  us  to-day  ? 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT       85 

Is  there  any  reason  to  think  that  we  can  use  one  of  them 
more  effectively  in  the  case  of  children,  another  for  youth, 
and  another  still  for  maturity  and  old  age  ?  Do  any  or 
all  of  them  require  some  amount  of  *  translation  '  in  order  to 
make  them  available  and  effective  as  appeals  in  our  day? 
Some  of  the  New  Testament  forms  are  certainly  more 
'  sympathetic  '  to  modern  ideas  and  language  than  others. 
Is  that  any  sufficient  reason  for  making  a  larger  use  of 
them  in  instruction,  or  have  we  more  real  need  of  other 
forms  more  foreign  to  our  pet  ideas  ?  We  must  remember 
that  our  purpose  is  not  to  pander  to  fugitive  modern 
whims,  but  to  serve  the  Christian  Gospel  in  order  to  satisfy 
legitimate  modern  needs  in  distinction  from  passing 
modern  wants.  Must  we,  for  instance,  eliminate  the 
eschatological  drama  of  the  Resurrection,  or  can  we 
preserve  its  essential  value  by  translating  it  into  some 
other  more  or  less  eschatological  form  of  belief  more 
consonant  with  our  modern  view  of  the  world  ?  How  far 
are  we  justified  in  using  the  term  Resurrection  at  all  if 
we  do  not  use  it  in  its  New  Testament  sense  of  the  soul 
rising  again  from  Sheol  ? 

Modern  Substitutes 

We  cannot  stop  even  here  with  our  questioning.  Can 
we  find  what  we  need  for  conserving  the  essential  faith 
in  a  life  after  death  in  any  of  the  New  Testament  forms  of 
belief  in  the  Resurrection,  whether  translated  into  modern 
terms  or  not  ?  Shall  we  be  forced  in  the  end  to  search 
for  some  quite  other  form  and  expression  as  a  means  of 
conserving  this  value  ?  For  instance,  shall  we  depend 
more  upon  the  spread  of  an  ethical  interpretation  of  the 
universe  or  upon  a  deepened  conviction  of  the  infinite 
value  of  man  and  the  individual  as  many  modern 
philosophers  seem  to  suggest  ?  Or  shall  we  walk  in  the 
ways  of  Positivism  and  trust  in  an  immortal  humanity  ? 
Shall  we  search  for  our  panacea  in  the  darkening  by- 
paths of  Theosophy  or  Spiritism,  or  shall  we  even  trust 
the  vicarious  deaths  of  the  battlefield  to  open  the  im- 
mortal doors  before  us  as  many  orthodox  popular  preachers 
seem  inclined  to  do  ? 


86    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

From  this  long  cross-examination  it  will  be  seen  that 
we  are  ultimately  thrown  among  the  most  living  moral 
and  religious  educational  issues,  and  the  need  of  a  deliberate 
and  careful  study  of  this  kind  is  becoming  more  and  more 
imperative  every  day. 

The  Eschatology  of  the  New  Testament 

Such  a  discussion  of  the  Resurrection  would  lead 
almost  inevitably  to  the  wider  question  of  the  whole 
Eschatology  of  the  New  Testament  with  its  Parousia, 
Judgment,  Heaven  and  Hell.  At  present  the  educational 
situation  with  regard  to  these  is  that  they  have  either 
disappeared  altogether  from  our  instruction  or  they 
retain  merely  a  formal  place  in  it  because  they  are  in  the 
New  Testament,  which  by  our  ordinary  methods  cannot 
be  taught  without  them.  The  belief,  however,  is  growing 
that  these  eschatological  pictures  do,  in  their  own  way, 
represent  some  intrinsic  or  instrumental  values  in  the 
moral  and  religious  life,  well  worth  conserving  for  future 
generations.  Having,  however,  practically  eliminated  the 
New  Testament  forms  of  these  values,  we  have  not  yet 
found,  nor  even  seriously  tried  to  find,  some  satisfactory 
substitute  for  them.  In  attempting  to  '  translate  '  such 
motives  as  the  eschatological  Heaven  and  Hell  or  in 
searching  for  satisfactory  substitutes,  it  will  probably  be 
necessary  often  to  remind  ourselves  that  our  need  is  two- 
fold. We  must,  that  is,  see  to  it  that  the  means  we  employ 
are  not  only  such  as  can  get  a  sure  grip  upon  the  actual 
people  we  are  dealing  with,  but  are  also  consistent  with 
the  moral  and  spiritual  end  for  which  we  are  working. 
They  must  be  in  and  for  themselves  in  some  way  good  and 
Christian  as  well  as  effective. 


3 

*  TRANSLATION  '  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT 

This  may  serve  as  a  more  or  less  typical  example  of 
the  kind  of  study  that  is  meant  when  we  speak  of  a  modern 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT      87 

educational  valuation  and  '  translation  '  of  the  New 
Testament  material  in  detail. 

The  Christian  teacher  is  in  urgent  need  of  a  systematic 
discussion  on  these  lines  with  regard  to  all  the  forms  and 
expressions  given  to  the  ideals  and  motives,  ends  and 
means,  ideas  and  events,  books  and  personalities  which 
make  up  the  New  Testament  and  early  Christianity. 

In  going  over  the  contents  of  the  New  Testament  with 
such  questions  as  the  above  in  our  minds,  we  shall  prob- 
ably find  a  call  for  almost  all  degrees  of  '  translation  ' — 
from  the  mere  translation  of  the  words  to  a  radical  trans- 
formation of  the  thought — in  order  to  make  the  New 
Testament  real  and  effective  in  our  day. 

The  Universal  Language  of  the  New 
Testament 

Such  expressions  as  '  Our  Father,'  '  God  is  Love,'  '  The 
pure  in  heart  shall  see  God,'  and  many  other  expressions 
which  belong  to  the  heart  and  soul  of  the  New  Testament 
need  no  translation  at  all.  They  speak  the  universal, 
direct  and  simple  language  of  the  human  heart  and  experi- 
ence. The  only  strange  thing  to  us  in  them  is  the  original 
language  in  which  they  were  spoken. 

At  the  other  extreme,  however,  such  expressions  as 
*  the  man  of  sin  '  or  '  Antichrist  '  will  naturally  stand 
at  the  bottom  of  our  scale  of  values  and  require  a  very 
radical  transformation  before  they  can  be  used  at  all  with 
any  effect  in  our  moral  and  religious  instruction.  To 
translate  them  into  modern  forms  and  modern  terms  is 
almost  impossible  even  if  it  were  worth  the  energy  and 
time  spent  upon  the  task. 

In  between  these  two  extremes,  almost  all  degrees  of 
adaptation  will  be  required  to  make  the  New  Testament 
material  educationally  effective.  Jesus,  for  instance,  in 
His  teaching,  life,  character  and  personality,  is  not  only 
much  more  primary  and  central  for  early  Christianity 
than  Paul,  but  also  requires  very  much  less  '  translation  ' 
to  make  him  the  most  effective  and  the  indispensable 
element  in  the  moral  and  religious  education  of  modern 
youth.     In  fact,  the  only  serious  difficulty  in  this  respect. 


88    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

so  far  as  the  main  body  of  the  Synoptic  presentation  is 
concerned,  springs  from  the  Messianic  idea  in  its  Jewish 
eschatological  form. 

Jesus  in  Education 

There  are,  however,  numerous  presentations  and 
descriptions  of  Jesus  in  the  New  Testament  which  provide 
a  good  example  of  the  very  various  degrees  of  relativity 
to  the  first  century  to  be  observed  in  the  ideas  of  the  New 
Testament.  He  is  Jesus,  Master,  Teacher,  Shepherd, 
Bishop,  Prophet,  Priest,  King,  Judge,  Lord,  Saviour, 
Redeemer,  Mediator,  Christ,  Son  of  David,  Son  of  Man, 
Son  of  God,  Lamb  of  God,  Last  Adam,  Only-begotten  Son 
and  the  Word  of  God.  Some  of  these  are  universally 
intelligible  and  at  the  same  time  represent  the  supreme 
values,  which  were  revealed  in  Jesus,  both  for  the  first 
century  and  for  all  ages.  They  therefore  have  peculiar 
educative  power.  Some  stand  much  further  away  from 
the  main  spiritual  values  revealed  in  Jesus  and  also 
require  a  far  more  complicated  process  of  interpretation 
and  translation  to  make  them  intelligible  for  modern 
man  and  effective  for  educational  purposes.  Sometimes, 
also,  owing  to  our  familiarity  with  the  language  of  the 
New  Testament  and  the  apparent  simplicity  of  the  terms 
themselves,  some  of  the  above  descriptions  seem  to  be 
much  more  intelligible  than  they  really  are.  To  most 
modern  readers,  such  a  title  as  *  The  Son  of  Man  '  is  really 
only  an  empty  phrase  so  far  as  the  appreciation  of  its 
characteristic  meaning  in  the  New  Testament  is  con- 
cerned. Usually,  indeed,  the  meaning  associated  with  it 
(namely,  as  emphasizing  the  humanity  of  Jesus)  is  far 
removed  from  its  original  use  in  Judaism  and  the 
Gospels. 

So  much  is  this  the  case  with  regard  to  some  of  the 
most  familiar  sayings  in  the  New  Testament  that  the 
question  must  often  arise  whether  it  would  not  be  better 
for  general  educational  purposes  to  rest  content  with  a 
conventional  and  traditional  interpretation  rather  than 
attempt  laboriously  to  make  intelligible  to  the  modern 
reader  their  more  exact  and  historical  meaning  in  the 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT       89 

New  Testament  itself.     An  example  may  make  clear  the 
dilemma. 


HOMILETIC    AND    SCIENTIFIC    ExEGESIS 

"  For  God  so  loved  the  world,"  says  the  Fourth  Gospel, 
"  that  He  gave  His  Only-begotten  Son,  that  whosoever 
believeth  in  Him  should  not  perish,  but  have  everlasting 
life."  Most  of  those  who  are  very  familiar  with  these 
words  interpret  them  as  the  simplest,  completest  and 
most  directly  religious  and  evangelical  description  of 
the  meaning  of  Christianity  to  be  found  in  the  New 
Testament.  That,  in  a  way,  is  quite  true.  This  actually 
does  underlie  the  saying,  but  the  popular  interpretation 
almost  entirely  disregards  the  typically  Johannine  meaning 
and  atmosphere  of  almost  every  word  in  the  passage. 
'  World,'  '  gave,'  *  Only-begotten,'  '  believeth  in  Him,' 
'  perish  '  and  '  everlasting  life  ' — all  represent  peculiarly 
Johannine  thoughts — theological  and  metaphysical — which 
overlay,  as  in  a  palimpsest,  the  simpler,  direct  expression 
of  Christian  experience.  Whether,  however,  it  would  be 
worth  while  attempting  to  rescue  that  exact  Johannine 
articulation  of  the  Gospel  in  this  case  for  any  but  technical 
students,  is  very  doubtful.  It  would  depend  partly  upon 
the  view  taken  of  the  comparative  value  for  the  general 
moral  and  religious  life  and  progress  of  the  two  following 
factors  which  are  involved. 

On  the  one  hand,  it  is  undoubtedly  a  great  educational 
gain  to  have  imprinted  upon  the  mind  of  youth  such  brief 
and  compact  symbolic  representations  which  are  inter- 
preted as  clearly  summarizing  in  a  simple  way  the  supreme 
values  of  Christian  experience.  On  the  other  hand,  the 
divorce  of  the  educational  or  the  homiletic  use  of  Biblical 
sayings  from  scientific  and  historical  accuracy  of  exegesis 
must,  in  the  long  run,  exert  an  evil  influence  upon  the 
health  and  progress  of  the  moral  and  religious  life. 

In  this  case,  very  probably  the  positive  gain  would 
outweigh  the  loss — because  the  aim  of  both  the  traditional 
interpretation  and  the  Johannine  writer  was  one  and 
the  same,  and  therefore  the  divorce  between  scientific 
accuracy  and  homiletic  use  is  not  in  this  case  as  complete 


go    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

as  it  often  is.  Generally  speaking,  however,  it  is  the 
duty  of  the  Christian  teacher  to  avoid  and  to  discourage 
this  kind  of  duahsm  in  his  teaching  so  far  as  possible. 
It  has  been  an  evil  influence  both  in  the  pulpit  and  the 
Sunday  School. 

4 
THE  LIMITATIONS  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT 

Such  a  conclusion,  however,  brings  us  into  the  very 
midst  of  the  second  series  of  questions  which  we  must 
face  as  soon  as  we  begin  to  make  practical  use  of  the 
material  of  the  New  Testament  for  the  purposes  of  moral 
and  religious  education. 

These  questions  were  concerned,  it  will  be  remembered, 
not  with  particular  valuations  of  the  various  items  of 
the  New  Testament  material,  but  with  the  character  and 
range  of  that  material  as  a  whole.  In  effect,  we  have  to 
ask  how  far  the  New  Testament  provides  us  with  all  that 
we  need  as  modern  teachers  for  our  instruction  even  in 
so  far  as  it  concerns  only  the  presentation  and  the  applica- 
tion of  the  Christian  Gospel.  The  effectiveness  of  the 
use  we  make  of  the  New  Testament  depends  upon  a 
definite  consciousness,  not  only  of  the  positive  help  which 
it  is  capable  of  bringing  and  does  bring  to  our  instruction, 
but  also  of  what  it  does  not  and  cannot  contribute  to 
our  need. 

Typical  Examples  of  its  Limitation 

Valuable  and  even  indispensable  as  is  the  New  Testa- 
ment for  the  modern  Christian  teacher,  there  are  evidently 
some  very  definite  limits  to  the  help  that  it  can  bring 
him.  There  are  still  some  very  important  needs  that  it 
cannot  satisfy  and  cannot  be  expected  to  satisfy.  The 
teacher  and  preacher  must  look  elsewhere  for  some  things 
that  are  absolutely  necessary  for  the  moral  and  religious 
instruction  of  our  day.  Indeed,  as  we  have  seen,  the 
very  help  that  the  New  Testament  brings  is  conditional 
upon  that  help  being  supplemented  from  other  sources. 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT      91 

Here,  we  must  be  content  with  giving  three  examples 
of  what  we  may  call  this  inherent  inability  of  the  New 
Testament  to  supply  in  full  what  we  need.  All  three 
are  necessary  consequences  of  the  historical  and  practical 
character  of  the  New  Testament — the  limitations  imposed 
upon  it  by  its  very  nature.  Historical  documents  in- 
tended definitely  for  their  own  age  must  necessarily  be 
limited  in  their  horizon  both  as  regards  time  and  range 
of  subjects.  The  New  Testament,  therefore,  just  because 
it  met  the  specific  needs  and  took  upon  it  the  specific 
forms  of  the  first  century,  cannot  ( i )  give  us  in  any  prepared 
form  such  a  system  of  moral  ideals  based  on  the  Gospel 
as  we  need  to  meet  the  specific  needs  of  the  twentieth 
century  ;  nor  (2)  give  us  that  knowledge  which,  as  teachers, 
we  must  have  of  those  specific  needs  and  forms  of  life  them- 
selves ;  nor  (3)  can  it  give  us  any  direct  and  full  guidance 
as  to  the  best  means  of  enforcing  our  ideals.  Especially, 
it  cannot  directly  show  us  how  the  Gospel  may  be  united 
with  those  features  of  modern  life  which  were  not  within 
the  range  of  the  first  Christian  teachers  and  preachers. 
These  limitations  we  will  proceed  to  discuss  in  this 
order. 


The  New  Testament  and  a  System  of  Values 

With  regard  to  the  first,  one  of  the  imperative  con- 
ditions of  any  permanently  effective  teaching  ministry 
is  that  the  teacher  or  preacher  should  be  in  possession 
of  some  fairly  unified  system  of  thought  and  life  as  a 
general  background  for  every  sermon  and  every  lesson. 
This  need  not  of  necessity  be  a  technical  system  of 
theological  doctrines,  but  it  must  include,  at  any  rate, 
a  fairly  consistent  view  of  the  ideal  or  some  system  of 
ideals  for  which  he  is  working,  some  consistent  system  of 
motives  with  which  to  enforce  those  ideals,  and  some 
consistent  system  of  practical  helps  towards  living  them. 
Every  sermon  and  every  lesson  may  make  some  definite 
and  special  impression  of  its  own,  but  there  should  be 
certainly  a  cumulative  and  consistent  impression  from 
lesson  to  lesson  and  from  sermon  to  sermon.  Indeed, 
permanent     impressions    on    mind    and    heart    and    will, 


92    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

that  is,  on  the  character,  are  generally  cumulative  in 
their  nature  and  not  instantaneous.  A  single  lesson  or  a 
single  sermon  may  and  sometimes  does  achieve  great 
temporary  success  by  arousing  some  expulsive  emotion, 
or  by  creating  an  impulse  which  can  immediately  find 
expression,  but  it  is  a  slowly  growing  accumulation  of 
impressions  that  usually  exercises  permanent  control 
over  life.  For  this  it  is  essential  that  the  hearer  or  scholar 
should  feel  that  the  different  impressions  he  gets,  one 
after  another,  all  belong  together  somehow,  and  that  he 
should  be  progressively  introduced  through  them  into 
the  same  world  of  feeling,  thought,  experience  and  life. 

The  Consistency  of  the  Teacher 

It  is  probably  impossible  for  any  one  who  has  to  be 
constantly  preaching  sermons  or  giving  instruction  never 
to  give  expression  to  opinions  that  are  inconsistent ;  but 
in  order  to  be  permanently  effective,  teaching  must  be 
consistent  enough  in  the  ideals  presented  and  in  the 
motives  to  which  appeal  is  made  to  make  some  unified 
general  impression  upon  those  who  listen  to  it. 

To  describe  the  ideal  to-day  as  obedience  to  the 
absolute  laws  of  the  world  and  God,  and  to-morrow 
as  the  life  of  freedom  ;  now  as  life  in  the  Holy  Spirit, 
and  then  as  union  with  Christ  ;  to-day  as  communion 
with  God,  and  to-morrow  as  love  and  service  of  men — 
this  must  become  a  source  of  bewilderment  rather  than 
of  education  if  no  attempt  is  made  to  bring  all  the  descrip- 
tions into  some  sort  of  relation  to  one  another  as  parts 
of  one  definite  system  of  life  and  thought. 

We  may  talk  of  reconstruction  as  much  as  we  like, 
but  it  will  never  come  to  anything  worth  bothering  about, 
unless  behind  it  there  are  some  dominating  moral  and 
spiritual  convictions  spreading  their  light  and  power 
over  the  whole  realm  of  life.  A  world  that  is  full  of  a 
myriad  different  plans  but  bankrupt  in  ideals,  conviction 
and  faith  will  only  gravitate  back  to  the  old  rut  once 
more,  and  with  added  impetus  in  the  end. 

Whether  we  can  in  reality  teach  the  New  Testament 
or  not  depends  largely  upon  whether  we  can  get  out  of 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT       93 

it  such  a  system   of  ideals  and  motives  as  will  satisfy 
the  deepest  needs  of  the  world. 


Unity  of  the  New  Testament  in  Jesus 

Here,  certainly,  the  New  Testament  comes  a  long  way 
at  least  towards  satisfying  the  need  of  the  Christian 
teacher — and  yet  not  by  any  means  all  the  way.  He  will 
find  in  the  New  Testament  certainly  different  strata  of 
life,  different  levels  of  living,  but  amidst  all  the  varied 
elements  in  these  writings  he  can  still  recognize  the  really 
distinct  spirit  and  life  contributed  to  the  world  by  the 
Christian  movement  embodied  in  many  different  forms. 

It  is  only  in  personality  that  this  spirit  of  life  can  be 
fully  and  adequately  expressed.  The  unity  that  is  behind 
and  in  the  New  Testament  is  a  living  unity.  It  is  a  spiritual 
unity  in  the  full  sense  of  that  term.  Jesus  Himself  is 
the  Gospel  of  the  New  Testament  because  He  is  incalcul- 
ably the  purest,  simplest,  most  direct  and  fullest  expression 
of  its  spirit  and  life. 

Systematic  Analysis  of  the  '  Values  *  in  Jesus 

He  remains  and  will  remain  the  Gospel  and  its  standard 
incorporation  unless  and  until  there  is  revealed  in  the 
history  of  mankind  a  life  of  higher  and  fuller  spiritual 
values  than  His,  bringing  with  it  a  stronger  moral  dynamic 
and  expressing  itself  in  fresher,  more  direct  and  more 
universal  forms.  If  and  when  that  comes  we  shall  surely 
know  it,  but  at  present  it  is  beyond  even  our  imagination. 

Yet,  just  because  our  Gospel  still  comes  to  us  in, 
through  and  as  an  historical  personality,  the  modern 
teacher  is  reminded  that  its  ideal  life,  as  it  is  found  even 
in  Jesus  Himself,  is  cast  in  the  mould  of  the  first  and  not 
of  the  twentieth  century.  It  must,  therefore,  remain 
his  task  to  show  that  for  our  time  and  conditions,  Jesus 
does  reveal  a  consistent  system  of  ideals  or  values  *  worthy 
of  all  acceptation.'  The  New  Testament  does  not  under- 
take that  task  for  him.  There  is  nowhere  in  it  any 
systematic  analysis  of  Jesus,  nor  any  attempt  to  make 
a  scale  or  system  of  the  moral  and  spiritual  values  incarnate 


94    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

and  revealed  in  Him.  Out  of  Jesus,  we  must  get  it  by  a 
progressive  interpretation — led  by  one  or  other  of  the 
supreme  categories  found  for  Him  by  New  Testament 
writers,  or  led  by  some  other  adequate  category  created 
by  His  influence  upon  the  thought  of  man  since  the  time 
of  the  New  Testament. 

That  is  why,  so  long  as  Jesus  thus  remains  the  highest 
life  incarnate  in  history,  it  is  the  duty  and  the  right  of 
every  generation  (and  even  of  every  disciple)  to  reinterpret 
and  to  revalue  Him  for  every  new  age  and  situation — to 
make,  that  is,  its  own  analysis  and  application  of  the 
spiritual  values  embodied  in  Him  for  the  satisfaction  of 
the  needs  of  its  own  life. 


The  Inevitable  Variety  of  Interpretation 

The  variety  of  interpretations  is  inevitable  until  we 
shall  have  found  the  one  adequate  category  that  can 
hold  together  all  His  values.  So  far,  all  the  different 
historical  interpretations  of  Jesus  fall  into  a  few  fairly 
well-defined  types,  and  every  well-equipped  teacher  will 
soon  find  in  one  variation  or  other  of  them  his  own 
personal  interpretation,  which  ought  to  and  will  inevitably 
become  the  background,  content  and  end  of  all  his  teaching. 


THE  TEACHER'S  KNOWLEDGE  OF  THE  MODERN 

WORLD 

The  second  necessary  limitation  in  the  help  to  be 
expected  from  the  New  Testament  concerns  the  know- 
ledge which  every  competent  teacher  must  have  of  his 
own  age  and  time — its  men,  women  and  children,  and 
their  actual  conditions  and  special  needs.  It  is,  of  course, 
the  actual  and  varied  needs  of  man,  personal  and  social, 
that  provide  the  first  justification  for  the  existence  of 
the  teacher.  It  is  a  realization  of  those  needs  that  gives 
him  and  his  calling  a  real  place  in  the  economy  of  life. 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT      95 

The  Teacher  and  Human  Nature 

One  of  his  main  qualifications  is  an  effective  know- 
ledge of  the  personal  and  social  life  as  it  actually  is  in 
the  men,  women  and  children  whom  he  sets  out  to  teach, 
their  best  and  their  worst,  their  virtues  and  their  vices, 
what  is  difficult  and  what  is  easy  for  them  to  do,  their 
triumphs  and  their  defeats,  their  joys  and  their  sorrows, 
their  temptations  and  their  trials. 

How  far  can  and  does  the  New  Testament  help  him 
to  obtain  possession  of  such  knowledge  ? 

It  is,  of  course,  true  that  there  are  deep  abiding 
features  in  human  nature,  and  that  there  are  human 
needs  fundamentally  the  same  in  all  ages.  The  Christian 
Gospel  is  intended  to  meet  those  needs.  That  is  why 
it  may  be  the  Gospel  for  the  twentieth  as  for  the  first 
century.  It  is  also  quite  as  true  that  though  man  is  thus 
alwaj^s  the  same,  men  and  the  conditions  of  life  are  always 
changing.  That  is  why  the  forms  of  the  Gospel,  as  well 
as  the  teaching  and  preaching  of  the  Gospel,  must  be 
different  for  different  men  and  times.  It  is  only  by  meeting 
the  changes  in  men  and  conditions  that  the  permanence 
of  the  Gospel  can  be  vindicated. 

The  World  of  the  New  Testament 

So,  by  emphasizing  the  fact  that  each  writing  of  the 
New  Testament  was  deliberate  teaching  for  its  own  time 
and  conditions,  and  was  always  in  touch  with  those  con- 
ditions, the  inference  is  made  inevitable  that  if  we  wish 
to  teach  and  to  preach  in  the  spirit,  and  on  the  lines  of 
the  New  Testament,  it  must  be  teaching  and  preaching 
for  the  twentieth  century  and  always  in  touch  with  its 
specific  conditions. 

On  the  other  hand,  by  revealing  the  actual  conditions 
of  the  first  century  in  the  Roman  Empire,  the  modern 
study  of  the  New  Testament  has  also  incidentally  shown 
us  how  different  in  many  respects  they  were  from  ours. 
It  has,  therefore,  made  plain  the  gap  that  must  be  filled 
by  the  teacher  if  he  wishes  to  present  and  apply  the 
Christian  Gospel  effectively  to  his  own  time.     He  cannot 


96    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

find  the  point  of  contact  for  his  Gospel  simply  in  the 
New  Testament,  but  is  driven  by  the  call  of  the  New 
Testament  itself  to  a  study  of  his  own  age,  both  from  a 
psychological  and  a  sociological  point  of  view. 

It  is  plain  that  the  New  Testament  cannot  itself  give 
him  this  knowledge.  It  can  only  compel  him  to  face 
the  absolute  need  for  such  a  knowledge. 

The  study  to  which  the  teacher  is  thus  driven  is  of 
two  kinds.  First  of  all,  it  is  a  study  of  universal  human 
nature  ;  and,  secondly,  of  the  particular  human  nature  of 
our  modern  world,  of  our  own  country  and  of  our  own 
pupils.  With  regard  to  the  former,  which  will  always 
remain  the  more  important,  a  careful  study  of  the  New 
Testament  can  still  help  us  very  considerably.  Our 
attention  has  already  been  directed  to  what  we  may  call 
the  human  nature  of  the  New  Testament — the  fact  that 
it  is  a  human  product  and  a  real  part  of  the  human  world. 
Simply  to  read  it  from  that  point  of  view  is  a  great  lesson 
in  the  knowledge  of  man,  of  universal  human  nature. 
It  is  a  unique  revelation  of  the  human  heart.  Its  inter- 
pretation and  exegesis  are  becoming  more  and  more 
psychological  in  character,  with  its  emphasis  upon  ex- 
perience and  personality  rather  than  upon  doctrine. 

Study  of  Modern  Men  and  Conditions 

All  this,  however,  will  not  take  us  very  far  in  reading 
and  understanding  the  signs  of  our  time.  For  that  we 
must  depend  ultimately  upon  our  own  contact  with  our 
own  world — with  the  actual  conditions  of  the  world  into 
which  the  Gospel  must  be  inserted — its  personal  and 
social  problems,  its  education  and  its  politics,  its  economic 
interdependence  and  rivalries,  its  labour  questions  and 
its  international  difficulties,  its  alienation  from  the  Church 
and  its  poor  substitutes  for  religion,  its  intellectual  chaos 
and  moral  helplessness  —  all  the  features  that  help  to 
distinguish  it  from  every  other  age  in  history. 

The  time  is  surely  coming,  if  it  has  not  already  come, 
when  men  who  have  been  overwhelmed  in  this  welter 
will  begin  to  read  the  New  Testament  with  a  new  anxiety 
to  find  out  the  help  it   can   give   them   in   meeting   the 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT      97 

problems — personal  and  social — which  they  have  utterly 
failed  to  solve  without  it.  There  is  some  danger  that  their 
search  may  lead  to  disappointment  at  first,  because  they 
will  be  apt  to  expect  a  great  deal  more  than  the  New 
Testament  can  possibly  provide  for  their  guidance.  It  is 
only  teachers  who  know  both  the  age  and  the  New  Testa- 
ment from  the  inside  sympathetically,  that  can  so  mould 
and  moderate  their  expectations  and  also  bring  to  the  fore 
their  deepest  needs  in  such  a  way  as  to  enforce  the  Gospel 
in  their  lives. 

6 

THE  MODERN  APPLICATION  OF  THE  GOSPEL 

Once  we  do  know  something  of  the  age  in  which  we 
live,  with  its  urgent  needs,  problems  and  interests,  we 
find  ourselves  still  facing  a  task  which  the  New  Testa- 
ment by  itself  cannot  help  us  adequately  to  perform. 

The  Real  Task  of  the  Teacher 

The  third  condition  of  effective  teaching  is  a  knowledge 
of  ways  and  means  whereby  the  actual  life  lived  by  men 
can  be  transformed  progressively  in  the  direction  of  the 
ideal.  The  task  of  the  teacher  is  to  bring  to  bear  upon 
his  scholars  such  various  influences  as  have  this  trans- 
forming power.  To  know  these  means  and  to  be  able 
to  use  them  well  is  the  real  original  work  of  the  teacher. 
The  ideal  in  its  essence  is  already  there,  given  in  the 
Gospel.  The  actual  conditions  which  must  somehow  be 
adjusted  to  it  are  facing  him  all  the  time.  These  are,  in  a 
sense,  the  fixed  points  between  which  he  moves.  His  real 
business  is  to  find  the  power  and  use  the  proper  means 
in  order  to  change  the  actual  into  the  ideal. 

All  the  world  is  open  to  him  in  his  search  for  these.  He 
can  appeal  to  all  the  motives  that  move  men,  the  hopes 
that  do  actually  inspire  them,  the  fears  that  haunt  them, 
family  instincts  and  national  sentiments,  self-respect  and 
love  and  loyalty — all  these  and  many  more,  in  addition  to 
the  sheer  attractive  power  of  the  ideal  itself,  are  at  his 
7 


98    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

service — so  long  as  he  remembers  that  he  is  a  teacher  of 
the  Christian  Gospel,  and  that  therefore  his  means  as  well 
as  his  ends  must  be  Christian  in  their  character  or  at 
least  consistent  with  or  capable  of  serving  Christian  ends. 
Here,  again,  the  New  Testament  comes  a  long  wa}''  to 
meet  him,  but  leaves  him  also  long  before  he  reaches  the 
end  of  his  journey.  It  does  offer  him  such  a  wealth  and 
variety  of  material  of  the  kind  he  needs  as  to  be  almost 
embarrassing,  and  it  shows  him  that  material  as  it  was 
actually  used  for  the  general  purpose  he  has  in  view.  In 
it  almost  every  chord  in  the  human  heart  is  struck  and 
struck  again  in  order  to  move  men  towards  Christ.  But 
here,  again,  once  more  we  are  warned  that  what  we  have 
in  the  New  Testament  from  this  point  of  view  is  an 
unclassified  record — almost  a  bewildering  chaos — of  the 
motives  and  means  used  by  first-century  preachers  to  meet 
the  needs  of  first-century  men  and  to  influence  them  in 
the  direction  of  the  Gospel.  The  New  Testament  cannot 
help  us  to  decide  whether  any  or  all  of  these  means  will 
effect  the  same  purpose  to-day.  For  that  kind  of  help 
the  teacher  must  look  outside  the  New  Testament  and 
himself  become  responsible  for  the  result.  For  permanent 
influence,  as  we  have  seen,  some  kind  of  consistency 
in  his  appeals  he  must  have,  for  it  will  be  futile  for  him  to 
threaten  the  same  people  with  hell  one  day  and  the  next 
day  rely  upon  the  sheer  moral  and  spiritual  power  of  love 
to  lead  them.  Indirectly,  of  course,  and  especially  so  far 
as  the  personal  life  of  men  is  concerned,  the  guidance  of 
the  New  Testament  still  stands  absolutely  unique  in  this 
respect. 

The  Gaps  in  the  New  Testament 

There  is,  however,  a  far  more  serious  limitation  to  the 
guidance  provided  for  the  modern  teacher  by  the  New 
Testament  in  attempting  to  find  effective  means  of  apply- 
ing the  Christian  Gospel  to  modern  life  as  well  as  to  the 
range  of  material  offered  to  him  in  the  New  Testament  for 
that  purpose. 

The  more  specifically  modern  problems  are  almost  all 
social,  and  the  most  critical  challenge  which  Christianity 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT       99 

and  the  Christian  Gospel  have  to  meet  is  primarily  neither 
personal  nor  intellectual  but  social.  It  is  a  challenge  to 
apply  the  Gospel  practically  to  the  growth  of  social  life 
in  all  its  forms.  And  it  is  here  that  historical  Christi- 
anity and  the  New  Testament  leave  the  Christian  teacher 
to  all  appearance  in  the  lurch.  On  the  surface,  at  any 
rate,  there  are  large  gaps  here  in  the  teaching  of  the 
New  Testament.  The  main  modern  social  problems  do 
not  seem  to  have  been  within  the  horizon  of  the  first 
missionaries  of  the  Gospel.  At  any  rate,  they  do  not 
seem  to  have  made  any  definite  attempts  to  apply  the 
Gospel  in  these  regions. 

Is  there  here  really  a  gap  in  the  Gospel  itself,  as  some 
have  held,  or  is  this  comparative  absence  of  contact  with 
social  problems  only  another  illustration  of  the  way  in 
which  the  first  Christian  teachers  kept  close  to  the  actual 
problems  before  them  ?  Can  the  Christian  Gospel  be 
brought  into  any  vital  and  effective  contact  with  these 
significant  elements  in  our  age  ?  Is  there  any  real  room 
for  them  in  the  life  of  the  Gospel,  or  must  we  say  that  it  is 
so  far  incomplete  and  requires  the  prophetic  ministry  of  a 
Luther,  for  instance,  to  complete  it  ?  Here  we  have  one 
of  the  main  tests  at  present  applied  to  the  New  Testament. 

The  Church  and  the  World 

It  is  useless  to  think  that  as  Christian  teachers  we  can 
in  any  way  evade  the  issue.  We  must  either  moderate 
our  claims  upon  men  or  we  must  go  forward  with  much 
more  enterprise  to  the  task  of  showing  that  there  can  be, 
and  ought  to  be,  a  Christian  society.  Christian  education, 
Christian  politics.  Christian  industry  and  Christian  inter- 
national relations.  The  world  is  waiting  to  hear  some- 
thing more  from  the  Church  than  a  proclamation  of 
principles  or  protests  against  evils,  although  even  here  the 
Church  has  lamentably  failed  in  its  duty  in  recent  years. 
No  progress,  however,  can  be  made  with  regard  to  social 
reconstruction  in  any  direction  until  Christian  teachers 
can  give  some  positive  guidance  based  on  the  principles 
of  the  Gospel  and  knowledge  of  the  facts  of  the  situation. 
It  is  evading  the  issue  to  say  that  we  do  not  know  enough 


100    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

about  educational,  political,  industrial  and  international 
conditions  to  do  what  is  required.  It  is  our  business  co- 
operatively or  personally  to  get  the  requisite  knowledge 
or  to  see  that  those  who  have  the  knowledge  use  it  in  the 
service  of  the  Gospel.  The  least  that  we  can  do  is  deliber- 
ately to  set  ourselves  to  train  a  new  generation  that  will 
be  more  capable  than  we  are  of  applying  the  Christian 
Gospel  to  the  social  situation. 


THE  SOCIAL  CONTRIBUTION  OF  THE  NEW 
TESTAMENT 

It  is  not  our  task  here  to  discuss  this  issue  as  a  whole. 
What  we  are  mainly  concerned  with  is  to  call  attention  to 
the  character  and  range  of  the  contribution  of  the  New 
Testament  to  its  solution.  That  must  be  indeed  one  of 
the  first  steps  towards  adopting  the  proper  Christian 
attitude.  Does  the  New  Testament  give  us  any  help 
at  all  to  meet  the  social  situation  ?  If  so,  exactly  what 
kind  of  help  ?  Does  it  reveal  to  us  the  spirit  in  which 
men  should  live  their  social  life  ?  Can  it  give  us  also  the 
principles  in  accordance  with  which  social  life  should  be 
organized  and  its  problems  solved  ?  Does  it  provide  us 
with  anything  that  can  be  called  a  Christian  programme 
in  these  matters  ?  Is  it  our  only  resource  to  fall  back 
upon  the  fundamental  nature  of  the  Gospel  itself  and  on 
our  own  responsibility  to  apply  it  in  what  seems  to  us 
the  right  way  ?  If  the  New  Testament  cannot  give  us 
sufficient  guidance  to  apply  the  Gospel  in  detail  to  all 
departments  of  social  life,  then  we  must  seek  it  elsewhere. 
It  is  our  first  duty,  however,  to  find  out  exactly  how  far 
the  New  Testament  is  capable  of  taking  us,  and  there  is 
urgent  need  of  intelligent  instruction  on  the  point. 

The  Social  Message  of  the  New  Testament 

To  what  extent  and  on  what  matters  is  the  Christian 
disciple  pledged  in  his  social  attitude  and  activities,  and 
where  does  his  liberty  of  opinion  begin  ? 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT     loi 

It  is  evident  that  there  is  no  such  thing  as  a  practical 
social  programme  in  the  New  Testament.  That  is  part  of 
its  natural  and  inevitable  limitation.  It  does  not  and 
cannot  do  our  thinking  and  our  organizing  for  us.  It  is 
evident  also  that  its  primary  interest  is  not  in  institutions 
and  organizations  but  in  men,  and  first  of  all  in  individual 
men.  It  is  to  individuals  that  it  makes  its  first  appeal, 
and  it  is  through  individuals  that  it  works. 

If  Jesus,  however,  is  the  incorporation  of  our  Gospel, 
then  His  disciples  and  His  Church  are  pledged  to  a  per- 
sonality intensely  social  in  spirit,  to  a  very  comprehensive 
conception  of  Christian  service  and  salvation,  to  certain 
broad  social  principles  and  convictions,  in  the  light  of 
which  that  service  must  be  given,  and  to  an  intelligent 
and  persistent  attempt  to  apply  that  spirit  and  those 
principles  specifically  to  the  social  circumstances  of  their 
time  and  generation.  One  may  also  be  justified  in  adding 
that  there  are  certain  tasks  and  duties  imposed  upon  a 
Christian  people  by  the  very  nature  of  the  Gospel  itself 
— such  tasks,  for  instance,  as  the  cure  of  poverty  and  the 
elimination  of  disease.  We  must  also  realize  very  keenly 
before  we  finish  reading  the  New  Testament  that  the 
Kingdom  of  God  cannot  be  established  by  organization, 
nor  simply  by  the  reform  of  laws  and  institutions.  The 
present  high  estimation  of  outward  civilization  in  general 
and  of  luxury  in  particular  seems  incompatible  with  the 
spirit  of  Jesus,  and  where  wealth  is  owned  at  all  such 
ownership  is  evangelically  permissible  only  when  it  is 
accompanied  by  a  vivid  consciousness  of  its  immense 
obligations. 

Its  Spirit,  Attitude  and  Principles 

"  It  has  been  aptly  said  that  '  Christ  views  social 
phenomena  from  above,  in  the  light  of  His  religious 
vocation.  He  approaches  them  from  within  through  the 
development  of  personality.  He  judges  them  from  their 
end,  as  contributing  to  the  Kingdom  of  God.'  Four 
great  principles  stand  out  clearly  from  His  teaching. 
God  is  our  Father  and  all  men  are  our  brethren.  The 
Kingdom  of  God   is   at   hand.     Life   is   the  measure   of 


102    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

true  value.  All  disciples  are  stewards.  While  in  some 
passages  a  sudden  apocalyptic  coming  of  our  Lord  is  sug- 
gested, His  teaching  involves,  at  least  as  often,  a  regenera- 
tion of  human  society  here  and  now  through  the  working  of 
the  law  of  righteousness  and  love,  and  in  the  background 
of  it  stands  the  message  of  social  righteousness  delivered 
by  the  prophets  of  the  Old  Testament.  God's  Kingdom 
implies  God's  reign  over  the  whole  of  human  conduct  and 
carries  with  it  a  fellowship  among  His  subjects.  There 
is  to  be  a  Christian  society,  a  People  of  God,  a  Church, 
which  shall  be  the  light,  the  salt,  the  leaven  of  human 
life.  But  this  Society  is  rather  the  means  of  realizing 
the  Kingdom  than  the  Kingdom  itself.  Life  at  its  highest 
is  the  knowledge  of  God,  but  all  human  life  comes  within 
our  Lord's  purpose.  Life  itself  is  carefully  distinguished 
from  the  material  means  of  living  ;  the  service  of  Mammon 
is  typical  of  the  spirit  of  the  '  Kingdom  of  this  age.' 
Wealth  is  dangerous  ;  and  detachment  from  preoccupa- 
tion with  wealth  is  the  first  mark  of  the  subjects  of  God's 
Kingdom."  ^ 

The  Demand  of  the  New  Testament 

So  far  the  New  Testament  does  actually  take  us  and 
the  Gospel  for  the  sake  of  which  the  New  Testament 
exists.  It  provides  us,  moreover,  with  numerous  illustra- 
tions of  the  way  in  which  the  first  teachers  did  actually 
apply  their  principles  to  the  social  as  well  as  the  personal 
problems  of  their  daj^  It  leaves  us  with  the  demand  that 
we  should  in  the  same  way  answer  to  the  call  of  our  time. 
It  does  not  and  cannot  tell  us  how  to  do  it.  When  we 
want  to  know  the  relation  of  Bolshevism,  Socialism, 
Capitalism,  Strikes,  War,  Nationalism  and  a  thousand 
other  features  of  our  time  to  the  Christian  Gospel  ;  when 
we  have  to  apply  the  principles  of  the  Gospel  to  the  Church, 
Politics,  Education,  Industry,  the  State  and  anj''  other 
forms  of  social  organization,  we  shall  not  find  the  answers 
ready-made  m  the  New  Testament  ;  but  it  demands  that 
we  should  search  diligently  for  the  answers  for  ourselves 
and  act  courageously  on  our  own  responsibility.     On  all 

^  Christianity  and  Industrial  Problems,  pp.  27-8. 


THE  MODERN  USE  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT     103 

these  points  there  is  urgent  need  of  Christian  solutions,  and 
it  is  a  definite  part  of  the  task  of  the  Christian  teacher  to 
make  full  use  of  the  New  Testament  for  that  purpose, 
taking  it  as  far  as  ever  it  will  go,  and  making  clear  the 
exact  value  of  its  contribution. 

BOOKS 

Baumgarten    (O.). — Neue    Bahnen.     (Leipzig,    1903.)     Predigt-Prob- 

leme.     (Tiibingen,  1905.) 
Mellone. — The  New  Testament  in  Modern  Life.     (London,  1920.) 
NiEBERGALL    (F.). — Wie     pvedigen     wir     dem    modernen    Menschen  ? 

(Tubingen,    1906.)     Praktische  Auslegung  des  Neuen   Testaments. 

(Tubingen,  1909.) 
Scott  (E,  F.). — The  Apologetic  of  the  New  Testament.     (London,  1907.) 
Weiss  (J.). — Die  Schriften  des  Neuen   Testaments  neu  Hbersetzt  und 

fUy  die  Gegenwart  erkldri.     (Gottingen,  1906.) 


CHAPTER  VI 

THE   CHRISTIAN   TEACHER  AND   HIS  TASK 

New  Tasks  and  Responsibilities. — Summary  of  Previous  Chapters — 
The  Changed  Situation — The  Integrity  of  the  Teacher — His 
Sphere  of  Work  Enlarged, 

The  Teacher's  Relation  to  the  New  Testament. — Deliverance  from  the 
Tyranny  of  the  Letter — A  Spiritual  Relation — The  Personal  Life 
of  the  Teacher. 

The  Common  Task  of  All  Teachers. — A  Teaching  Fellowship — All 
Teachers  engaged  in  making  Men. 

Teaching  the  Christian  Gospel. — The  Background  and  Content  of 
the  New  Testament — The  Preparatory  Work  to  be  kept  in  its 
Place — Finding  the  Soul  and  the  Power  of  the  New  Testament — 
The  New  Testament  and  the  Gospel — The  Traditional  Idea  of 
the  Gospel — The  Gospel  in  History. 

The  Nature  of  the  Christian  Gospel. — Faith  in  Christ  and  the  Faith 
of  Jesus  Himself — The  Organic  View  of  the  Gospel  and  its  Ex- 
pressions— Intellectual  Statements  Necessary  but  Inadequate — 
Teaching  the  Gospel  means  spreading  the  Spirit,  Life  and 
Principles  of  Jesus — Methods  and  Agencies,  Old  and  New — 
A  Campaign  of  Christian  Education. 


NEW  TASKS  AND  RESPONSIBILITIES 

We  have  now  described  the  main  conditions  under  which 
the  teacher  of  the  New  Testament  must  do  his  work — 
the  general  guidance  he  can  obtain  from  the  principles 
and  methods  of  modern  education,  and  the  character  of 
the  material  with  which  he  has  to  deal. 

We  suggested  the  main  lines  on  which  an  educational 
interpretation  can  be  given  to  the  New  Testament  as  a 
whole  and  in  detail.  We  have  also  attempted  to  define 
the  value  and  place  of  the  New  Testament  material  in 


THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  HIS  TASK        105 

the  process  of  education,  to  describe  the  extent  and 
nature  of  its  positive  contribution,  and  to  mark  out  the 
necessary  limitations  to  its  modern  use  as  an  educational 
instrument. 

Before  passing  on  to  discuss  the  particular  problems 
involved  in  the  task  of  teaching  the  New  Testament,  it 
may  now  be  possible,  in  the  light  of  the  preceding  dis- 
cussions, to  indicate  more  definitely  and  more  systematically 
than  we  have  yet  done  the  nature  and  meaning  of  that 
task,  both  in  relation  to  the  wider  interests  of  education 
generally,  and  in  its  bearing  upon  the  personal  position 
and  attitude  of  the  teacher  himself. 

Our  literary,  historical  and  educational  interpretation 
of  the  New  Testament  at  once  places  the  Christian  teacher 
in  a  position  far  freer  and  far  more  responsible  than  ever 
before. 

The  Changed  Situation 

He  must  now  appear  before  his  pupils,  and  before  all 
men,  without  shield  or  armour,  as  it  were,  taking  nothing 
for  granted  but  the  actual  facts  and  postulates  of  human 
life  and  human  nature.  There  was  a  time  when  he  could 
build  confidently  upon  a  certain  theory  of  the  Bible,  to  be 
accepted  without  discussion  or  proof.  Now,  the  validity 
and  value  of  what  he  has  to  say  can  depend  only  upon 
actual  facts  which  can  be  tested  by  ordinary  human 
methods  in  the  same  way  as  all  other  facts  of  a  similar 
kind.  He  does  not  ask  men  to  take  what  he  says  on  blind, 
unreasoning  trust  to  any  greater  extent  than  is  done  in 
other  departments  of  human  experience  and  knowledge. 
If  any  one  likes  to  obtain  the  necessary  qualifications 
he  can  test  for  himself  everything  that  is  said.  It  is 
deeper  and  deeper  inquiry  that  is  desired  most  of  all. 
The  teacher  dare  not  shelter  himself  behind  any  dogmatic 
theory  of  the  origin  or  authority  of  the  Bible.  He  dare 
not  hide  behind  the  New  Testament  itself  from  the  shafts 
and  arrows  of  criticism.  He  must  be  ready  to  lay  bare 
even  the  very  foundations  of  life  itself,  and  see  whether 
they  are  well  and  truly  laid. 


io6    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  Integrity  of  the  Teacher 

This  inevitably  means  harder  work,  greater  responsi- 
bility and  greater  courage,  but  it  means  also  the  redemp- 
tion of  the  integrity  of  the  teacher  himself,  both  moral 
and  intellectual.  That,  in  itself,  is  one  of  the  greatest  of 
personal  gains  for  him. 

There  has  been  lurking  in  the  minds  of  even  naturally 
religious  people  a  dark  suspicion  that  the  ordinary  canons 
of  thought  and  judgment  have  no  validity  in  Christian 
teaching  and  preaching.  The  Sunday-school  teacher,  as 
well  as  the  preacher,  they  say  or  think,  has  to  preach 
and  to  teach  what  the  Bible  says,  because  it  is  in  the 
Bible  and  not  because  it  is  really  a  positive  truth  for  life 
in  general  or  because  he  really  believes  what  he  says. 
The  fundamental  honesty  and  integrity  of  the  ordinary 
preacher  is  widely  and  seriously  doubted.  Thorough 
intellectual  integrity  in  the  pulpit  is  a  matter  for  surprise 
and  bewilderment.  The  first  thing  which  a  public  teacher 
of  Christianity  has  to  do  in  these  days,  if  he  wishes  to  get 
into  living  touch  with  men,  is  to  redeem  his  moral  and 
intellectual  integrity  at  almost  any  cost.  It  is  a  much 
more  valuable  asset  on  the  side  of  the  Gospel  than  any 
success  he  may  attain  by  means  of  his  eloquence  or  his 
brilliancy. 

The  modern  criticism  of  the  New  Testament,  it  is 
true,  cannot  purchase  his  honesty  for  him,  but  by  com- 
pelling him  to  throw  away  the  artificial  protection  of  a 
Bible,  a  quotation  from  which  is  supposed  to  establish 
any  truth,  it  makes  the  redemption  of  his  honesty  possible 
and  much  easier. 


The  Sphere  of  his  Work  Enlarged 

The  very  thing,  however,  which  enables  the  teacher 
to  establish  his  honesty  and  integrity  at  the  start  also 
vastly  enlarges  the  sphere  of  his  work.  The  range  of  his 
teaching  or  preaching  is  inevitably  widened.  New  tasks 
are  laid  upon  him,  and  these  mean  new  opportunities. 
Since  he  cannot  now  start  by  silently  taking  for  granted 
that  the  New  Testament  is  the  last  court  of  appeal  and 


THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  HIS  TASK        107 

that  its  written  word  is  a  final  external  authority,  he  is 
compelled  to  lay  the  foundations  of  his  message  deeper 
down  and  deal  at  first  hand  with  the  fundamental  issues 
of  life.  That  means  a  nearer  approach  to  the  universal 
human  standpoint,  more  reality  and  more  living  contact 
with  the  actual  facts  of  life. 

The  Christian  teacher  must  now  show  not  only  that 
there  is  a  direct  way  from  the  Bible  into  life,  but  also 
from  life  itself  into  the  New  Testament.  He  must  not 
only  try  to  make  the  ideals  of  life  conform  to  the  truths 
of  the  New  Testament,  but  also  to  test  the  statements 
of  the  New  Testament  by  the  facts  of  life.  Indeed,  the 
particular  kind  of  teaching  that  is  most  needed  in  our 
time  is  the  teaching  that  will  make  the  New  Testament 
once  more  a  living  book,  a  book  by  live  men  to  living  men. 
Even  those  who  are  closely  identified  with  the  Churches, 
as  well  as  those  who  are  outside  them,  stand  in  great 
need  of  this  kind  of  teaching.  It  is  only  very  rarely 
that  the  Christian  teacher  can  take  for  granted  in  his 
pupils  of  all  ages  much  knowledge  of  the  contents,  meaning 
and  value  of  the  New  Testament.  Generally  the  best 
that  we  find  is  a  vague  kind  of  more  or  less  inherited 
belief  in  the  supreme  value  of  the  '  Bible.'  The  people 
who  hold  such  a  belief  are  continually  in  need  of  teaching 
that  will  clarify  their  ideas  of  the  kind  of  value  we  have 
in  the  Bible,  that  will  make  them  realize  how  the  Bible 
has  acquired  that  value,  and  how  in  detail  it  has  sprung 
out  of  life.  That  means  to  say  they  are  always  in  need 
of  transforming  their  inherited  belief  into  a  living  faith, 
by  being  compelled  again  and  again  to  build  it  up  from 
the  foundations. 


THE  TEACHER'S  RELATION  TO  THE  NEW 
TESTAMENT 

Freedom  from  the  Tyranny  of  the  Letter 

The  modern  Christian  teacher  has  thus  been  given  an 
opportunity  to  redeem  his  moral  and  intellectual  integrity. 


io8    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

He  has  also  been  compelled  to  undertake  a  more  funda- 
mental and  living  kind  of  teaching.  The  same  process, 
however,  has  also  delivered  him  from  the  tyranny  of  the 
letter  of  the  New  Testament.  He  has  been  delivered 
from  all  those  arbitrary  methods  of  exegesis  and  inter- 
pretation— spurious  homiletic  uses  of  single  phrases  and 
texts,  the  licence  of  allegorical  methods  and  the  vagaries 
of  the  ingenuity  exercised  on  predictions  and  apocalypses 
— methods  which  are  the  inevitable  consequence  of  insist- 
ence on  the  letter  of  Scripture.  We  have  been  compelled 
to  recognize  radical  differences  in  value  between  sayings 
and  to  go  behind  the  letter  and  the  individual  statements 
to  the  books  of  which  they  form  a  part  and  to  the  life 
and  experience  expressed  in  them.  The  letter  becomes 
the  handmaid  of  faith  instead  of  being  the  tyrant  of 
thought  and  belief. 

This,  however,  does  not  mean  that  the  Christian 
teacher  is  cast  adrift  from  the  moorings  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment. Modern  study  has  shown  more  clearly  than  ever 
how  dependent  he  is  in  reality  upon  the  New  Testament, 
It  is  the  only  record  of  the  founder,  the  foundation  and 
first  spread  of  the  Christian  Religion,  the  record  of  its 
formative  age  and  of  the  classical  types  of  the  life  it 
produces.  From  the  New  Testament  we  get  our  clearest 
knowledge  of  the  Christian  Gospel  and  ideal  as  well  as 
of  the  various  forms  it  took  in  the  hands  of  its  first  teachers. 

A  Spiritual  Relation 

The  difference  now  is  that  this  tie  with  the  New  Testa- 
ment is  not  one  of  the  letter  but  of  the  spirit.  It  is  a 
relation,  to  use  Paul's  phrase,  '  in  Christ.'  It  not  only 
allows  but  compels  us  to  ask  how  the  letter  is  connected 
with  the  spirit  of  the  New  Testament  and  what  is  the  exact 
relation  between  it  and  the  Christian  Gospel. 

The  practical  effect,  therefore,  of  our  previous  dis- 
cussions, so  far  as  the  personal  attitude  of  the  Christian 
teacher  in  relation  to  his  task  is  concerned,  may  be  de- 
scribed in  brief  as  follows.  The  redemption  of  his  in- 
tellectual integrity  is  secured,  inasmuch  as  his  dealing 
with   the   New  Testament   no   longer  imphes  the   initial 


THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  HIS  TASK        109 

acceptance  of  a  ready-made  theological  dogma  which 
cannot  be  examined  in  open  court.  | 

He  is  compelled  to  face  more  fundamental  questions 
which  concern  the  validity  and  value  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment in  general  and  in  detail.  He  is  delivered  from  the 
tyranny  of  the  letter  of  the  New  Testament,  inasmuch  as 
the  value  of  its  written  word  depends  upon  the  spiritual 
life  and  experience  it  expresses. 

The  real  nature  of  the  relation  between  the  teacher 
and  the  New  Testament  has  been  revealed  as,  first  of  all, 
historical,  and  then  a  spiritual  relation.  He  is  bound  to 
it  in  the  same  sense  as  he  is  bound  to  the  historic  Christian 
Church,  namely,  in  so  far  only  as  it  preserves  the  Christian 
Gospel  in  spirit  and  atmosphere. 

The  Personal  Life  of  the  Teacher 

All  this  demands  not  only  much  harder  and  sterner 
work,  but  also  a  much  fuller  and  richer  personal  religious 
life  on  the  part  of  the  teacher.  For  this  there  can  be  no 
substitute  at  all.  No  amount  of  objective  respect  for 
the  record,  no  amount  of  historical  faithfulness  and  no 
amount  of  intellectual  honesty — important  and  necessary 
as  these  are — can  ever  make  up  for  the  lack  of  a  personal 
experience  of  the  moral  and  spiritual  power  of  the  Gospel. 
The  historian  and  the  philosopher  may  do  a  great  deal  for 
the  New  Testament  and  its  interpretation,  but  merely  as 
such  they  can  never  teach  it  in  any  full  sense.  That  can 
only  be  done  finally  by  the  intelligent  Christian  disciple 
whose  soul  is  continually  fed  by  the  Lord  of  the  New 
Testament  and  of  all  life. 

Naturally,  as  compared  with  the  traditional  attitude 
towards  the  Bible,  the  attitude  we  have  described  may 
involve  the  danger  of  a  rather  pronounced  subjectivity. 
That  cannot  be  avoided,  but  its  responsibility  must  be 
bravely  shouldered,  and  it  is  partly  compensated  for  by 
the  emphasis  on  the  historical  objectivity  of  the  Christian 
Gospel  which  will  come  to  light  in  the  following  section. 


no    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

3 

THE  COMMON  TASK  OF  ALL  TEACHERS 

So  far,  we  have  been  dealing  mainly  with  the  more 
personal  attitude  of  the  Christian  teacher  in  approaching 
his  task.  The  task  itself  requires  some  fuller  description 
and  definition. 

If  the  discussions  of  the  previous  chapters  mean  any- 
thing they  mean  that  once  more,  as  in  the  early  days  of 
Christianity,  the  Christian  teacher  must  stand  shoulder 
to  shoulder  in  the  ranks  of  the  vast  army  of  the  teachers 
of  the  human  race,  sharing  in  the  same  great  task,  bur- 
dened with  the  same  great  responsibilities,  meeting  the 
same  difficulties  and  enjoying  the  same  and  only  the  same 
rights,  privileges  and  opportunities. 

A  Teaching  Fellowship 

Into  this  wide  fellowship  the  Christian  teacher  should 
enter  with  enthusiasm,  for  it  means  that  he  and  his  task 
are  no  longer  to  be  washed  into  an  isolated  backwater  and 
kept  there,  but  that  he  is  to  join  with  the  mighty  throng 
of  those  who  sail  the  wide  waters  of  the  river  of  life.  He 
will  rejoice  in  this  not  only  because  his  own  work  will  be 
kept  constantly  in  touch  with  the  realities  of  the  common 
life,  but  also  because  the  task  of  all  other  educators  will 
be  widened  in  outlook  and  deepened  in  spirit  by  constant 
touch  with  the  rich  and  inspiring  material  which  he  can 
bring  to  the  common  store.  His  moral  authority  will 
increase  in  proportion  to  his  success  in  bringing  his  material 
into  closer  and  closer  contact  with  the  living  needs  of 
men  whose  appetite  will  grow  by  what  it  feeds  on.  It  will 
henceforth  be  his  fault  if  an  '  effective  demand  '  does  not 
arise  for  what  he  has  to  offer. 

All  Teachers  engaged  in  making  Men 

It  may  seem  to  him  that  many  of  the  world's  teachers 
must   live  continuall}'  far  away  beyond   the  boundaries 


THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  HIS  TASK        iii 

of  his  territory,  dealing  with  material  which  seems  far 
removed  from  his  specific  task  ;  but  he  must  never  let 
himself  forget  that  even  teachers  of  Geography,  Latin 
and  Mathematics  are  somewhere  or  other  leaving  their 
mark  upon  the  minds  and  souls  of  those  whom  he  also 
has  to  teach,  and  that  they  need  and  in  the  end  will 
value  his  help  and  comradeship  to  ensure  that  that  mark 
should  somehow  or  other  become  one  of  '  the  marks  of 
Jesus.*  In  time,  the  Christian  teacher  himself,  dependmg 
solely  upon  the  spontaneous  inspiration  and  power  of  the 
moral  and  religious  ideal  depicted  in  the  New  Testament 
— and  incompletely  but  effectively  in  himself — will  find 
that  he  is  called  naturally  to  a  place  of  pre-eminent 
and  central  influence  for  his  work's  sake.  Read  the  Bible, 
it  has  been  said,  as  an  ordinary  book,  and  it  will  soon 
become  for  you  the  most  extraordinary  book  in  the  world. 
Let  the  Christian  teacher  also  enter  honestly  into  the 
common  fellowship  of  the  other  human  teachers  of  child 
and  youth  around  him,  sharing  in  the  common  task  of 
shaping  thought  and  heart  and  will,  helping  them  to  grow 
into  free  men,  then  he  too  will  find  the  highest  honour 
and  dignity  freely  given  to  him. 


4 

TEACHING  THE  CHRISTIAN  GOSPEL 

A  distinctive  and  decisive  place  among  the  world's 
teachers  belongs  by  right  to  the  Christian  teacher,  mainly 
because  he  brings  in  his  hands  the  New  Testament  as 
a  teaching  instrument  of  incomparable  worth — as  far 
superior  to  any  '  text-book  of  morality  '  as  Jesus  Christ 
Himself  is  superior  to  the  conventional  life  of  men.  It 
is  by  handling  the  New  Testament  aright  that  the  Christian 
teacher  will  find  and  keep  his  rightful  place.  It  is  as  a 
teacher  of  the  New  Testament  that  he  should  be  known 
first  and  last — by  his  effective  use  of  its  material  for  the 
fullest  human  education.  He  must  not  allow  himself  to 
think  meanly  or  superficially  of  the  meaning  and  range 
of  his   task.     Teaching  the   New  Testament   well   is   the 


112    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

most  serious  and  arduous  task  to  which  the  teacher  ever 
set  his  hand. 

It  does  not  mean  using  the  New  Testament  as  a  dump- 
ing ground  for  our  own  small  ideals  and  motives — much 
less  for  our  own  theological  beliefs  and  opinions  or  for 
our  own  fads  and  fancies.  It  does  mean  giving  reliable 
information  about  the  New  Testament,  about  the  contents 
and  history  of  its  books  and  about  the  background  of 
the  life  from  which  they  sprang.  What  we  try  to  make 
the  New  Testament  do  educationally  depends  upon  what 
the  New  Testament  is.  We  must  make  it  intelligible 
before  we  can  make  it  interesting,  and  it  must  become 
interesting  before  it  can  become  effective. 

This  study  will  attempt  to  do  three  things.  It  will 
seek  to  describe  and  appreciate  (i)  the  Background  of 
the  New  Testament  ;  (2)  the  New  Testament  as  Literature 
and  History  ;  and  (3)  the  Religion  and  Theology  of  the 
New  Testament.  We  must  not  underestimate  the  import- 
ance of  this  task,  for  it  is  the  essential  foundation  upon 
which  the  higher  aspects  of  teaching  the  New  Testament 
must  be  built.  In  its  main  aspects  it  will  come  before 
us  later  on. 

To  a  large  extent,  however,  it  represents  only  the 
work  of  scaffolding,  which  must  not  be  confused  with  the 
real  task  of  building,  upon  which  the  teacher  is  engaged. 
We  must  keep  it  in  its  proper  place,  and  more  particularly 
that  part  of  it  which  deals  with  the  geographical,  political 
and  social  background  of  the  New  Testament.  Enough 
of  this  kind  of  knowledge  must  be  given  to  make  the 
books  intelligible,  but  maps  and  models,  the  details  of 
habits  and  customs  of  Oriental  lands,  must  not  be  allowed 
to  monopolize  the  time  and  energy  of  teacher  and  pupil 
as  they  have  sometimes  been  in  danger  of  doing. 

Teaching  the  New  Testament  itself  means  nothing 
less  than  teaching  the  essential  content  and  message  of 
the  New  Testament,  or  rather  of  the  religious  movement 
which  created  the  New  Testament.  It  means  using  the 
material  which  is  peculiarly  its  own  contribution  to  the 
life  of  the  world  in  such  a  way  and  at  such  a  time  as  to 
give|the  most  effective  impetus  possible  to  the  formation 
of  character  and  to  the  making  of  personalities  who  have 


THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  HIS  TASK        113 

a  life  to  live  and  work  to  do  in  our  modern  world.     Every- 
thing else  is  only  preliminary  to  that. 

The  final  task  which  the  serious  Christian  teacher  has 
to  do  is  a  much  more  delicate  and  strenuous  task  than 
merely  transmitting  information  about  the  New  Testa- 
ment. He  must  grip  securely  the  soul  and  power  of  the 
New  Testament,  while  its  soul  and  power  must  grip  him 
organically,  and  through  him  become  organically  one 
with  the  life  of  men  and  the  world. 


The  Gospel  in  the  New  Testament 

To  do  his  work  adequately,  therefore,  the  teacher  must 
take  pains  to  find  out  what  is  the  soul  and  power  of 
the  New  Testament.  We  have  already  considered  some 
aspects  of  this  question  in  relation  to  the  unity  of  the 
New  Testament  and  to  the  unity  which  must  be  behind 
all  the  teacher's  instruction.  What  we  are  here  specially 
concerned  with,  is  its  place  in  the  task  of  teaching  the 
New  Testament.  In  its  more  general  relations  the  question 
is  fast  becoming  the  central  and  critical  problem  in  all 
discussions  of  Christian  history,  Christian  Ethics  and 
Christian  thought.  What  is  Christianity?  What  is  its 
essence  ?  What  is  its  peculiar  contribution  to  the  life 
of  the  world  ?  To  use  what  is  perhaps  the  most  fitting 
phrase  in  this  connection,  and  which  we  have  already 
adopted  for  our  purpose,  what  is  the  essential  meaning 
and  power  of  the  Christian  Gospel  ? 

It  is  not  easy  to  describe  in  explicit  terms  the  situation 
created  in  this  respect  by  the  traditional  theories  of  the 
infallibility  of  the  written  word  of  the  Bible  as  an  external 
authority.  When  Dean  Burgon,  from  the  University 
Pulpit  at  Oxford,  not  much  more  than  half  a  century 
ago,  could  say  of  the  Bible  that  "  every  book  of  it,  every 
chapter  of  it,  every  verse  of  it,  every  syllable  of  it,  every 
letter  of  it  is  the  direct  utterance  of  the  Most  High,"  it 
is  evident  that  every  part  of  the  New  Testament  was 
as  necessary  to  the  Christian  Gospel  as  every  other  part. 
In  fact,  the  Gospel  was  literally  the  Bible. 


114    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  Traditional  Idea  of  the  Gospel 

On  the  other  hand,  nothing  was  more  characteristic 
of  the  old  Evangehcahsm  than  the  idea  of  what  was  called 
'  the  simple  Gospel  '  —  always  the  same  in  form  and 
substance  for  all  men  and  for  all  times.  Theoretical^, 
at  any  rate,  it  stood  in  no  vital  relation  to  time  and  place. 
It  was  the  business  of  the  preacher  simply  to  proclaim 
it  to  all  and  sundry,  and  it  was  sufficient  for  him  to  do  so. 
This  required  no  teaching  in  the  proper  sense  at  all,  but 
simple  proclamation  and  the  exhortation  to  believe. 
This  *  simple  Gospel  '  was  the  stock-in-trade  of  the 
orthodox  evangelist — a  recipe  for  all  the  ills  that  flesh 
is  heir  to,  and  it  was  already  made  up  for  him  into  a  dose 
in  neat  packets.  It  could  be  easily  expressed  in  a  series 
of  apparently  simple  statements  either  of  abstract  truths 
or  historical  facts  which  comprised  '  the  plan  of  salva- 
tion.' This  worked  out  in  the  end  as  the  main  points 
of  a  system  of  scholastic  theology  or,  in  the  phraseology 
of  a  somewhat  later  time,  of  *  fundamental  doctrines,' 
which  was  supposed  to  be  the  actual  content  of  the 
New  Testament  and  inseparably  connected  with  the 
Virgin  Birth,  the  Miracles,  the  atoning  Death  and  the 
Resurrection. 

It  is  difficult  for  us  now  to  realize  how  these  two 
views  of  the  Gospel,  as  identical  with  the  Bible  as  a  whole 
and  yet  at  the  same  time  a  consistent  system  of  truths, 
could  be  held  together  in  the  same  mind.  Yet  we  can 
see  that  they  both  sprang  from  the  same  root,  namely, 
from  the  idea  of  Revelation  and  inspiration  as  external 
and  supernatural.  God,  it  was  believed,  had  spoken  to 
men  once  and  for  all  from  outside.  His  Word  enters  into 
life  as  a  new  and  independent  element,  side  by  side  with 
but  untouched  by  human  capacities,  changes  and  circum- 
stances.   That  Word  is  the  Bible. 

The  Gospel  in  History 

We  have  certainly  travelled  far  since  these  views  of 
the  Gospel  and  the  New  Testament  could  be  held.  We 
have  seen  too  clearly  the  heterogeneous  elements  which 


THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  HIS  TASK         115 

have  entered  into  the  making  of  the  New  Testament — 
elements  that  are  often  inconsistent  with  each  other 
and  with  the  original  teaching  of  Jesus.  The  only 
question  now  is  as  to  how  the  Christian  Gospel  is  related 
actually  to  the  New  Testament  and  in  which  direction 
we  are  to  look  for  it.  We  may  still  speak  of  the  *  simple 
Gospel,'  but  only  in  the  sense  that  at  the  heart  of  the 
Christian  movement  there  is  a  direct  and  inevitable 
appeal,  so  clear  and  so  simple  that  to  it  every  man  can 
and  must  answer  '  Yes  '  or  *  No.'  There  has  never  been 
such  a  Gospel  as  could  be  picked  up  like  a  stone  and 
flung  at  men  haphazard  in  the  hope  that  it  would  hit 
one  of  them.  One  of  the  great  things  we  have  learnt  is 
that  the  New  Testament  does  not  give  us  the  Gospel  as 
an  abstract  truth,  but  always  in  concrete  relations.  We 
cannot  find  the  Gospel  anywhere  except  embedded  in 
history,  and  in  the  concrete  relations  of  life.  We  find  it 
in  history  intertwined  with  a  vast  mass  of  traditional 
material  of  all  kinds,  including  Oriental  imagery  and 
myths,  pagan  *  mysteries,'  Greek  philosophy  and  Roman 
Law — in  Creeds,  Sacraments  and  Church.  We  find  it 
embedded  in  the  life  and  experience  that  is  behind  the 
New  Testament.  It  came  to  us  first  of  all  incarnate — 
wrapped  up  in  an  historical  life  and  as  a  life.  It  was 
'  the  Word  made  flesh  '  and  not  the  bare  abstract  Word. 
It  was  lived  out  at  a  certain  historical  period  under 
definite  and  temporary  historical  circumstances.  Its 
history  since  then  is  a  process  of  organic  growth  and  life 
in  and  through  the  circumstances  of  each  age.  It  is  in 
Christian  history  as  the  life  is  in  the  tree.  That  life 
cannot  be  separated  from  the  sap  and  the  roots,  the  trunk 
and  the  branches  ;  yet  these  take  new  forms  and  shapes 
with  every  new  spring,  while  the  life  still  lives  and  ex- 
presses itself  through  them  in  new  ways. 

5 

THE  NATURE  OF  THE  CHRISTIAN  GOSPEL 

We  have  already  attempted  to  express  the  Gospel  as 
the  New  Testament  reveals  it.     It  is  the  hfe  *  in  Christ,' 


ii6    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

in  Paul's  phrase,  expressed  first  of  all  in  and  through  the 
personal  life  of  Jesus  under  the  definite  conditions  and 
meeting  the  definite  needs  of  the  first  century  in  Palestine. 
It  is  subsequently  expressed  in  the  life  of  His  disciples 
much  more  imperfectly,  but  still  meeting  and  assimilating 
the  circumstances,  needs  and  problems  of  men  in  Antioch, 
Corinth  and  Rome.  It  is  always  the  same  life  essentially, 
the  Gospel  of  Christ  and  the  religion  of  Jesus  being  only 
different  forms  and  expressions  of  it. 

The  Organic  View  of  the  Gospel  and  its  Expressions 

If  the  modern  study  of  the  Bible  has  taught  us  any- 
thing, it  ought  to  have  taught  us  to  elevate  above  all 
else  the  ethical  and  religious  content  of  the  Gospel  which 
underlies  all  its  expressions.  Faith  in  Christ  must  mean 
primarily  faith  in  what  Jesus  stands  for,  and  what  Jesus 
stands  for  we  must  surely  find  in  His  own  personal  life — 
in  the  spirit,  attitude  and  character  of  Jesus,  even  more 
than  in  His  verbal  teaching. 

Intellectual  Statements  Necessary  but  Inadequate 

It  is,  then,  this  organic  view  of  the  Gospel  as  the  life 
*  in  Christ,'  embodied  in  varying  historical  forms,  which 
is  the  peculiar  contribution  of  the  New  Testament,  The 
distinguishing  marks  and  the  intrinsic  values  of  this  life 
we  can,  no  doubt,  as  in  the  case  of  the  tree,  describe  in  a 
general  way,  but  we  never  succeed  in  reducing  the  descrip- 
tion to  quite  universal  terms  or  abstract  statements,  for 
we  never  find  the  life  except  in  more  or  less  temporary 
forms.  There  is  always  some  element  of  limitation  in 
the  most  general  statement  of  its  meaning  and  power. 
No  expression  exhausts  its  fulness,  and  every  historical 
and  intellectual  expression  of  it  includes  something  other 
than  the  thing  itself.  In  accordance  with  the  paradox  of 
the  spiritual  life,  this  something  more  always  means 
something  less  than  the  spiritual  reality.  The  nearest 
we  have  come  to  expressing  the  Gospel  in  general  state- 
ments is  in  such  terms  as  the  Fatherhood  of  God  and  the 
Brotherhood  of  Man,  but  we  cannot  look  even  upon  these 
as  the  Gospel  which  makes  the  New  Testament  what  it  is. 


THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  HIS  TASK        117 

Abstract  statements,  however  true  and  however  Christian, 
do  not  make  up  the  Christian  Gospel. 

More  or  less  abstract  statements  we  must,  in  the 
nature  of  the  case,  have,  and  they  have  their  own  place 
in  education.  It  will  again  and  again  be  necessary  for 
the  teacher  to  realize  the  Gospel  as  including  certain 
definite  intellectual  principles  or  convictions,  and  as 
embodying  definite  moral  qualities  clearly  related  to  each 
other.  There  is,  however,  probably  no  analysis  of  this 
kind  which  will  at  present  command  universal  assent. 
One  will  interpret  the  Gospel  mainly  in  religious  terms 
of  the  Fatherhood  of  God  and  childlike  trust  in  Him  ; 
while  another  will  start  from  the  Brotherhood  of  man, 
and  so  emphasize  the  ethical  call  of  the  Gospel  to  the 
persistent,  loving  service  of  men  ;  while  still  another  will 
prefer  to  express  it  in  terms  of  constant  and  prompt 
obedience  to  conscience,  and  so  emphasize  the  realization 
of  the  highest  and  fullest  personal  life.  What  is  here 
emphasized  is  that  the  teacher  must  use  these  interpreta- 
tions— and  especially  those  of  the  New  Testament — in 
order  to  lead  his  pupil  deeper  and  deeper  into  the  life 
and  personality  of  Jesus  Himself,  as  greater  far  than 
all  attempts  to  interpret  and  to  explain  Him. 

The  Principles  and  Spirit  of  Jesus 

When,  therefore,  we  speak  of  teaching  the  New  Testa- 
ment, we  cannot  mean  by  it  simply  the  proclamation  of 
certain  moral  and  religious  truths,  however  important. 
We  cannot  mean  by  it  even  teaching  Jesus  Christ  in  the 
sense  of  getting  men  to  imitate  the  individual  outer  or 
inner  life  of  Jesus.  It  must  mean  in  the  end  to  spread 
the  life  that  was  in  Jesus  in  such  a  way  as  to  make  it 
organically  one  with  all  the  manifestations  of  life  in  our 
day  and  express  itself  in  all  the  circumstances  and  move- 
ments of  our  life.  The  historical  and  practical  conse- 
quences of  the  Gospel  are  inevitable  and  involved  in  its 
existence,  though  they  may  vary  from  age  to  age.  These 
consequences  are  at  the  same  time  both  personal  and 
social  ;  they  are  ethical  and  intellectual  ;  and  the 
Christian  Gospel  is  not  taught  effectively  to  any  age  until 


ii8    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

these  consequences  are  made  plain  and  urgent  to  its  mind 
and  heart  and  will — to  its  conscience. 

Methods  and  Agencies,  Old  and  New 

For  the  teacher  of  the  New  Testament,  therefore,  there 
is  no  stopping-place  until  this  whole  task  is  accomplished. 
It  is  his  duty  and  privilege  not  only  to  have  the  nature  of 
this  task  clear  in  his  mind  and  urgent  upon  his  conscience, 
but  to  search  for  every  method  and  agency  which  is 
capable  of  being  used  for  the  purpose.  The  Church 
already  provides  him  with  its  traditional  educational 
agencies  in  the  pulpit  and  Sunday  School.  Both  need 
to  be  transformed,  however,  in  order  to  become  efficient 
instruments  of  Christian  education  and  instruction.  The 
official  Christian  ministry  and  pulpit  especially  will  have 
to  take  its  teaching  work  much  more  seriously.  We 
cannot  avoid  this  by  pleading  our  prophetic  mission. 
The  permanent  influence  of  the  prophetic  afflatus  and 
message  itself  can  only  be  guaranteed  by  more  systematic 
teaching.  It  can  only  be  filled  with  meaning  and  power 
by  its  educational  content  and  end.  In  fact,  all  the 
traditional  institutions  of  the  Church  need  overhauling 
from  this  educational  point  of  view  ;  while  in  order  to 
meet  the  changes  in  outlook  and  in  the  nature  and  range 
of  the  Christian  task,  the  Church  must  also  go  in  search 
of  new  methods  and  new  agencies  through  which  its  work 
can  be  more  effectively  done.  It  is  true  that  the  Church 
must  use  the  New  Testament  more  than  it  does  for  pro- 
viding itself  with  the  Christian  instruction  it  so  badly 
needs.  It  is,  however,  called  also  to  the  Christian  educa- 
tion of  the  world  at  large. 

For  this  purpose,  we  need  agencies  more  definitely 
organized  for  the  instruction  of  youth  and  maturity.  It 
should  be  much  more  public  in  character  through  public 
lectures  and  free  discussions  quite  different  from  the 
present  more  or  less  private  meetings  of  the  Church. 
There  is  need  also  for  a  more  intellectual  and  clarifying 
type  of  instruction  than  the  present  '  edifying  '  methods 
provide.  An  order  of  public  Christian  teachers  whose 
main  business  was  to  organize  educational  agencies  of  this 
kind  would  be  a  great  boon. 


THE  CHRISTIAN  TEACHER  AND  HIS  TASK        119 

The  task  of  the  Christian  teacher,  therefore,  so  far  as 
the  New  Testament  is  concerned,  is  threefold.  He  must 
transmit  a  knowledge  of  the  New  Testament — its  back- 
ground, literature,  history,  ethics,  religion  and  theology. 
He  must  use  this  material  in  order  to  make  clear  and 
enforce  the  essential  meaning  and  message  of  the  New 
Testament,  its  peculiar  contribution  to  the  life  of  the 
world,  the  Christian  Gospel  and  its  power.  He  must 
finally  use  this  Gospel  and  its  power  as  an  integral  part 
of  all  the  influences  which  all  kinds  of  educators  are  bring- 
ing to  bear  upon  the  human  young  in  particular,  in  order 
to  grow  ideal  Christian  personalities  and  a  society  of  such 
personalities  in  the  Kingdom  of  God. 

All  this  implies  and  demands  an  efficient  teaching 
ministry  in  many  forms.  The  Christian  teacher  is  as 
necessary  to  the  Christian  Gospel  as  the  Gospel  itself,  and 
a  clear  idea  of  its  nature  and  meaning  are  necessary  to 
him.  Nothing  less  than  a  consistent,  persistent  and 
insistent  policy  and  campaign  of  Christian  education  will 
ever  meet  the  need.  To  have  the  larger  share  in  this  task 
of  Christianizing  the  world  in  practice — of  putting  the 
stamp  of  Jesus  upon  all  its  life  in  every  department — is 
the  privilege  and  responsibility  of  the  teacher  of  the  New 
Testament. 

BOOKS 

Ayre   (G,    B.). — Suggestions  for   a   Syllabus   in   Religious    Teaching. 

(London,  191 1.) 
Bryant  (Sophie), — How  to  read  the  Bible  in  the  Twentieth  Century. 

(London,  1918.) 
Denney  (J.). — Jesus  and  the  Gospel.     (London,  1913.) 
Faunce  (W.  H.  p.). — The  Educational  Ideal  of  the  Ministry.     (New 

York,  1908.) 
Forsyth  (P.  T.). — Positive  Preaching  and  the  Modern  Mind.     (London, 

1907.) 
Hackenschmidt  (K.). — Die  Christus-Predigt  fiir  unsere  Zeit.     (Gottin- 

gen,  1909.) 
Haslett  (S.  B.). — The  Pedagogical  Bible  School.     (Chicago,  1903.) 
Pease  (G.  W.). — An  Outline  of  a  Bible-School  Curriculum.     (Chicago, 

1906.) 
Raymont  (T.). — The  Use  of  the  Bible  in  the  Religious  Education  of  the 

Young.     (London,  191 1.) 
ZuRBELLEN  (Else  und  Otto). — Wic  erzdhlen  wir  den  Kindern  die 

biblischen  Geschichten  ?     (Tiibingen,  1906.) 


PART  II 

TEACHING  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  :  ITS 
MAIN  PROBLEMS 


VII.  The  Life  of  Jesus  for  Childhood. 

VIII.  The  Synoptic  Presentation  of  Christ  for  Adolescence. 
IX.  Teaching  the  Parables. 
X.  The  Problem  of  the  Miracles. 
XI.  The  Birth  and  Resurrection  of  Jesus. 
XII.  The  Apostle  Paul  and  his  Letters. 
XIII.  The  Johannine  Literature,  Thought  and  Life. 
XIV.  Jesus  Christ  and  the  Kingdom  of  God. 


CHAPTER  VII 

THE   LIFE   OF   JESUS   FOR   CHILDHOOD 

Presentations  of  Christ  in  the  New  Testament. — Christ  in  Christian 

Instruction — The   Synoptic,   Pauline  and   Johannine  Types   of 

Life  and  Thought — The  Main  Features  of  Each. 
The  Synoptic  Presentation  in  Instruction. — Difficulties  of  the  Gospels 

— The  Gospels  in  Modern  Instruction — Teaching  of  Infancy  and 

Childhood  in  Relation  to  Adolescence. 
The  Historical  Life  of  Jesus. — Presentation  of  Christ  to  Childhood — 

Must  be  Historical — Historical  Value  of  the  Gospels — The  Use 

of  Non-historical  Material. 
Content  of  the  Life  of  Jesus. — Outline — Boyhood  and  Youth — Main 

Elements  of  the  Public  Ministry — Last  Days  and  Death — The 

Story    in    the    Gospels — Makes  a  Difficult  Demand — Dramatic 

Elements — Educational    Dangers — Aims    and    Methods    of    the 

Teacher — The  Resurrection. 
Moral  and  Religious  Appreciation. — Love  for  Jesus  and  its  Qualities 

— Moral,  Intelligent  and  Reverent — Based  on  the  Love  of  Jesus 

for    Men — Main    Features    of   His   Life  for  Boyhood — Heroic^ 

Adventurous  and  Joyous  Love. 


PRESENTATIONS  OF  CHRIST  IN  TflE  NEW 
TESTAMENT 

Christ  in  Christian  Instruction 

At  this  stage  of  our  discussion  it  may  reasonably  be  taken 

for  granted  that  the  central  task  of  Christian  education 

is  to  bring  the  growing  personality  more  and  more  into 

vital  union  with  the  spirit  and  will  of  Jesus  Christ,  and 

to  secure  the  thorough  application  of  that  '  life  in  Christ  ' 

in  and  to  all  the  manifold  relations  of  life — personal  and 

social. 

193 


124    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Correspondingly,  the  task  of  Christian  instruction 
(which  is  only  one  aspect  of  education)  is  to  present  Jesus 
Christ  in  His  life  and  teaching,  His  work  and  personality, 
in  such  a  way  and  at  such  a  time  as  to  help  effectively  in 
bringing  about  that  vital  union  with  Christ  and  its  personal 
and  social  application.  It  follows  that  the  essential 
meaning  of  teaching  the  New  Testament  is  to  make 
effective  use  of  its  material  for  that  definite,  moral  and 
religious  purpose,  and  for  every  subordinate  end  that 
may  be  necessary  for  the  purpose. 

It  is  therefore  evident  that  the  spirit  of  Christ  must  not 
only  animate  the  teaching  throughout,  but  also  that  the 
central  place  must  be  assigned  to  the  actual  presentation 
of  Jesus  Christ  Himself. 

The  Three  Main  Types  of  Thought  in  the 
New  Testament 

That,  of  course,  must  be  supremely  true  of  the  New 
Testament  part  of  Christian  instruction,  for  it  might  well 
be  said  that  the  New  Testament  is  nothing  else  but  a 
series  of  presentations  of  Christ.  There  are  in  it  almost 
as  many  presentations  of  Christ  as  there  are  writers. 
They  may  be  conveniently  divided,  however,  into  three 
main  types,  namely,  the  Synoptic,  the  Pauline  and  the 
Johannine.  These  represent  the  three  main  forms  in 
which  the  Christian  Gospel  was  presented  in  the  formative 
period  of  Christian  history.  Naturally,  these  three  are 
not  independent  of  one  another,  but  reveal  a  definite 
development  of  Christian  experience  and  thought  in 
contact  with  a  different  environment.  They  may  roughly 
be  distinguished  from  one  another  by  saying  that  the 
Synoptic  Gospels  present  Jesus  as  the  Messiah  ;  that  Paul 
presents  Him  as  the  redeeming  Son  of  God  ;  while  the 
Fourth  Gospel  presents  Him  as  the  revealing  Logos  or 
Word  of  God. 

In  their  different  ways,  all  three  look  upon  Him  as  in 
some  sense  divine.  In  the  Synoptics,  His  divine  dignity 
comes  to  Him  partly  at  His  birth,  but  mainly  at  His 
baptism  ;  in  Paul,  His  divine  powers  (in  some  way  not 
quite  clear)  are  in  a  state  of  suspense  during  His  life  on 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  125 

earth,  but  become  active  in  a  new  way  through  the  Cross 
and  Resurrection  ;  while  in  John  the  earthly  life  is  only 
another  mode  of  His  full  divine  existence. 

To  a  greater  or  less  degree,  all  three  are  theological 
constructions  based  upon  and  issuing  from  the  historical 
life  and  death  of  Jesus  of  Nazareth,  combined  with  a 
definite  appreciation  of  His  moral  and  religious  value. 

The  Main  Features  of  Each  Type 

These  three  elements  of  historical  life,  religious  ap- 
preciation and  theological  construction,  are  mixed  in  very 
different  proportions  and  co-ordinated  in  very  different 
ways  in  the  three  presentations.  In  the  Synoptics,  the 
history  is  by  far  the  most  significant  factor,  and  it  is  what 
stamps  the  whole.  The  appreciation  is  mainly  one  of 
the  moral  value  of  the  teaching  of  Jesus,  while  the  theo- 
logical element  makes  itself  felt  mainly  in  a  definite 
apologetic  tendency  which  is  only  loosely  combined  with 
the  life  and  death. 

The  Pauline  presentation,  on  the  other  hand,  is  marked 
by  the  predominance  of  the  theological  point  of  view. 
This  is  so  closely  interwoven  with  the  religious  apprecia- 
tion that  it  is  often  a  very  difficult  task  to  separate  the 
two,  and  sometimes  it  is  quite  impossible.  With  the 
exception  of  the  death,  the  historical  life  almost  dis- 
appears from  the  presentation,  though  there  are  many 
signs  that  it  is  always  in  the  background,  and  that  it  was 
one  of  the  main  factors  in  the  origin  of  both  the  religious 
appreciation  and  the  theological  construction. 

The  presentation  of  Christ  in  the  Johannine  literature 
is,  at  the  same  time,  a  further  development  of  Pauline 
ideas  and  an  attempt  to  combine  the  Pauline  conception 
with  the  Synoptic  type.  The  Johannine  presentation 
thus  becomes  a  theology  or  a  philosophy  put  into  the 
form  of  a  life  of  Christ.  Here  the  historical  element,  the 
religious  appreciation  and  the  theological  construction 
are  almost  inextricably  mixed  up  together  in  such  an 
intimate  way  that  it  seems  a  hopeless  task  to  try  to  keep 
them  apart  or  to  express  them  separately. 

It    will    be    agreed    that    in    dealing  with    the   main 


126    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

problems  raised  by  the  use  of  the  New  Testament  in 
modern  Education,  we  must  deal  first  with  the  Synoptic 
presentation  as  the  earUest  and  the  simplest  as  well  as 
the  most  historical  of  the  three  main  types  of  life  and 
thought  in  the  New  Testament.  We  must  try  to  see  what 
is  its  place  and  value  in  our  moral  and  religious  instruction 
— what  elements  in  it  are  available  for  our  main  purpose, 
and  when  they  can  be  used  with  most  effect. 


THE  SYNOPTIC  PRESENTATION  IN 
INSTRUCTION 

It  is  evident  that  the  full  presentation,  even  of  the 
simplest  of  the  Synoptic  Gospels,  cannot  be  adequately 
appreciated  before  childhood's  days  are  well  over.  It  is 
quite  possible  and  even  probable  that  most  of  the  material 
of  the  first  three  Gospels  was  derived  from  the  catechetical 
instruction  of  the  Early  Church  ;  but  if  so,  it  was  certainly 
not  the  instruction  of  children.  It  must  have  been  that 
of  growing  youths  and  adults. 

Difficulties  of  the  Gospels 

That  naturally  does  not  mean  that  there  are  no 
elements  in  Mark,  Matthew  and  Luke  eminently  suitable 
for  the  instruction  of  children  of  all  ages.  What  it  does 
mean  is  that  the  material  they  provide  must  often  be 
taken  out  of  its  context,  and  must  always  be  specially 
adapted  for  use  during  the  earlier  periods  of  life.  The 
Synoptic  presentation  as  a  whole  belongs  peculiarly  to 
the  adolescent  stage.  There  are  also  other  difficulties 
in  the  way  of  using  the  Synoptic  material  in  its  actual 
Biblical  form  for  the  purpose  of  introducing  Jesus  Christ 
to  the  younger  children.  For  instance,  there  are  three 
Synoptic  Gospels,  and  the  question  must  immediately 
arise  as  to  whether  we  should  make  one  the  basis,  and 
gather  the  material  of  the  others  around  it  for  the  pur- 
poses of  instruction,  or  use  a  kind  of  amalgam  of  all  three, 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  127 

as  is  often  suggested.  Both  methods,  however,  involve 
some  adaptation  of  the  Synoptic  presentation  under  the 
influence  of  a  more  or  less  subjective  point  of  view. 

Further,  it  is  plain  that  there  are  moral,  religious 
and  theological  conceptions  in  each  of  the  Gospels  which 
are  definitely  above  the  comprehension  of  any  child  of 
nine  or  ten.  Such  are  the  ideas  of  Messiah,  the  Son  of 
Man,  Son  of  God,  as  well  as  many  of  the  conceptions 
of  the  Sermon  on  the  Mount. 

Moreover,  the  kind  of  appreciation  of  Jesus  that  we 
find  in  the  Synoptic  Gospels  is  not  always  such  as  we  can 
desire  to  perpetuate  in  our  permanent  valuation  of  Him. 
Only  too  often  they  seem  to  describe  Him  in  terms  of 
supernatural  and  miraculous  power.  It  is  implied  that 
some  of  His  deeds  are  displays  of  sheer  divine  power.  It 
is  true  that  this  element  is  not  usually  a  part  of  the  deed 
itself  ;  it  is  often  easily  separable  from  the  substance  of 
the  incident  narrated.  The  act  itself  is  generally  capable 
of  interpretation  under  other  categories  than  mere  power. 
In  any  case,  we  cannot  wish  to  allow  an  impression  of 
Jesus  as  a  prodigy  of  mere  power  to  become  the  primary 
element  in  our  appreciation  of  Him  upon  the  mind  of 
child  or  youth.  There  are  indeed  plenty  of  signs  that 
Jesus  Himself  desired  to  avoid  anything  of  the  kind. 

On  the  other  hand,  on  the  face  of  the  Synoptic  narra- 
tives, the  appreciation  of  Jesus  in  terms  of  His  personal 
character  and  personal  religion  appears  to  be  of  only  second- 
ary interest  to  the  writers.  They  certainly  supply  us  with 
plenty  of  material  for  reconstructing  the  main  features 
of  His  personal  religion,  but  often  we  have  to  do  so  out 
of  elusive  suggestions  and  incidental  references.  Any 
permanent  interpretation  of  Christ  will  of  necessity 
reverse  this  order  of  interest  and  scale  of  values.  Our 
highest  terms  will  be  those  of  character  and  personality — 
with  the  stress  upon  personal  religion  and  the  moral  will. 

Finally,  the  Synoptic  presentation  sometimes  consists 
of  narratives  which  certainly  in  their  present  form  do  not 
belong  to  the  historical  life  of  Jesus,  but  are  rather  symbols 
of  the  Synoptic  faith  in  Christ  and  the  creations  of  that 
faith.  As  we  shall  see,  modern  religious  instruction  may 
be  able  to  make  very  good  use  both  of  the  moral  content 


128    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

as  well  as  the  form  of  these  legendary  stories,  but  it  is 
not  often  that  they  can  in  their  Biblical  form  become 
part  of  our  presentation  of  Jesus  itself.  Their  place  and 
value  and  the  method  of  using  them  in  Biblical  instruc- 
tion, must  be  more  fully  discussed  later. 

No  MERE  Reproduction  of  the  Gospels  possible 

All  this  means  that  our  presentation  of  Christ  can 
never  be  anything  like  a  literal  reproduction  of  the 
Synoptic  construction.  We  must  be  satisfied  at  first  with 
something  less,  and  always  with  something  different  in 
its  motive  and  purpose.  In  fact,  we  must  dig  below  the 
surface  for  the  richest  veins  of  gold  underneath,  if  we  wish 
to  use  the  Synoptic  presentation  of  Christ  effectively 
for  the  moral  and  spiritual  ends  of  the  Christian  Gospel. 
Mark,  Matthew  and  Luke  provide  us  with  an  abundant 
wealth  of  material,  and  the  most  essential  material  for 
the  purpose ;  but  if  we  are  to  use  it  effectively  in  Christian 
instruction  we  must  be  free  to  select  and  adapt  it,  to  a 
greater  or  less  degree,  to  the  needs  and  capacities  of  the 
varying  stages  of  moral  and  religious  growth. 

In  order  to  find  out  what  to  select  and  how  to  adapt, 
we  must  return  for  a  moment  to  our  psychological  results. 
As  we  have  seen,  the  material  of  the  New  Testament  in 
its  full  sense,  and  especially  its  presentations  of  Christ, 
are  the  natural  food  of  adolescence.  All  the  teaching 
given  to  infants  and  children  is  from  this  point  of  view 
only  preparatory,  just  to  the  degree  that  childhood  itself 
is  a  preparation  for  adolescence. 

Childhood  in  relation  to  Adolescence 

There  is,  however,  another  sense — and  one  quite  as 
real — in  which  it  is  true  that  each  period  of  human  growth 
represents  not  merely  a  stage  on  the  way  to  a  higher, 
but  something  complete  in  itself,  different  from  and 
independent  of  the  life  of  every  other  period.  In  this 
sense,  infancy  and  childhood  have  each  its  own  Gospel 
adequate  for  itself  and  corresponding  to  its  need.  That 
may  be  a  Christian  Gospel — as  Christian  in  its  spirit  as 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  129 

that  of  adolescence — but  it  is  necessary  to  remember 
that  it  can  never  be  the  full  Christian  Gospel. 

It  may  be  said,  therefore,  that  in  our  effort  to  present 
Christ,  the  adequacy  of  our  instruction  will  depend  upon 
our  success  in  combining  these  two  points  of  view,  namely, 
that  of  infancy  and  childhood  as  preparatory  stages  on 
the  way  to  adolescence  and  maturity,  with  that  of  the 
same  periods  as  revealing  their  own  independent  life 
and  needs  which  do  not  depend  upon  adolescence  for 
their  completion. 

To  combine  successfully  these  two  points  of  view  in 
the  working  out  of  a  scheme  of  instruction  and  education, 
is  one  of  the  supreme  tasks  of  the  Christian  teacher. 
What  may  be  offered  here  or  elsewhere  can  only  be  very 
inadequate  suggestions  based  upon  very  imperfect  know- 
ledge. Nevertheless,  the  attempt  must  be  made  again 
and  again  to  solve  the  problem  as  one  of  the  central 
difficulties  of  religious  teaching. 


THE  HISTORICAL  LIFE  OF  JESUS 

Presentation  of  Christ  to  Childhood 

We  do  not  come  face  to  face  with  the  real  difficulties 
of  the  problem  until  we  have  to  deal  with  the  instruction 
of  late  childhood  (between  the  ages  of  nine  and  twelve). 

There  is  a  fairly  general  agreement  among  modern 
educators  that  this  is  the  fit  and  proper  time  for  making 
the  first  attempt  to  give  anything  like  a  consistent  and 
more  or  less  systematic  picture  of  Jesus,  and  that  the 
attempt  should  be  made  towards  the  beginning  rather 
than  the  end  of  this  period. 

Naturally,  the  child  will  have  already  been  told 
a  number  of  suitable  Wonder-tales  and  other  stories  of 
which  Jesus  is  in  some  sense  the  hero  ;  but  so  far  they 
have  been  told  only  as  individual  stories  complete  in 
themselves.  They  have  been  told  also  not  so  much  for 
the  sake  of  giving  a  picture  of  Jesus  as  for  the  sake  of 
some  element  of  educational  value  in  each  story  itself. 
9 


130    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

At  about  eight  or  nine  years  of  age,  however,  the  child 
is  ready  to  appreciate  to  some  degree  a  connected  series  of 
stories,  and  in  an  elementary  way  the  picture  of  a  growing 
personality  as  well  as  the  meaning  of  history  as  dis- 
tinguished from  an  independent  '  once-upon-a-time  '  story. 
There  is  an  opportunity  of  impressing  upon  the  mind 
some  simple,  consistent  and  clear  picture  of  Jesus,  through 
His  deeds  and  words,  in  His  relations  with  God,  man  and 
the  world  around  Him. 

The  questions  of  the  special  aim,  general  character, 
form  and  content  of  this  first  deliberate  presentation  of 
Christ  are  essentially  educational  questions,  although 
some  theological  considerations  are  undoubtedly  involved 
in  any  attempt  to  answer  them.  Educational  principles 
and  methods  ought  to  be  the  decisive  factors,  and, 
fortunately,  substantial  agreement  is  to  be  found  among 
those  best  qualified  to  form  an  opinion  with  regard  to 
the  main  points. 

Must  be  essentially  Historical 

In  the  first  place,  the  presentation  of  Christ  for  child- 
hood should,  without  any  doubt,  be  essentially  historical. 
This  is  not  meant  in  the  sense  that  every  item  of  it  must 
be  guaranteed  as  literal  fact  by  historical  criticism,  but 
in  the  sense  that  it  must  provide  the  picture  of  a  life 
actually  lived  out  under  definite  historical  circumstances 
of  time  and  place.  It  must  not  be  left  hanging  in  the 
air,  as  it  were,  out  of  effective  touch  with  the  earth. 
Without  overdoing  the  local  colouring  and  the  more 
trifling  peculiarities  of  the  time,  it  ought  to  be  the  picture 
of  an  individual  Jew  of  Galilee  in  the  first  century.  The 
universal  elements  themselves,  which  are  so  evident 
in  the  life  of  Jesus,  demand  this  individual  background 
in  order  to  reveal  their  meaning  and  power.  That  is 
one  of  the  great  advantages  of  the  biographical  approach 
to  history  and  religion,  and  we  must  make  the  most  of  it 
at  this  stage.  The  adaptability  of  the  Synoptic  presenta- 
tion for  this  very  purpose  is  also  the  very  reason  why  it 
is  to  be  preferred  to  the  Pauline  and  the  Johannine 
presentations  for  purposes  of  instruction. 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  131 


The  Historical  Value  of  the  Synoptic  Gospels 

This,  of  course,  raises  the  whole  question  of  the 
historical  value  of  the  Synoptic  Gospels.  If  the  teacher 
were  ever  led  to  believe  that  no  such  person  as  Jesus  ever 
lived,  it  would  make  the  task  of  teaching  the  New  Testa- 
ment a  very  different  thing.  Whatever  might  be  the 
effect  of  such  a  conclusion  upon  the  value  of  the  Christian 
religion,  it  would  certainly  reduce  the  value  of  the  New 
Testament  as  an  educational  instrument,  especially  for 
this  period  of  life,  to  a  much  lower  level.  The  Synoptic 
material  would  then  have  to  be  relegated  to  a  later  period 
to  keep  company  with  the  Johannine  Gospel.  Instead 
of  the  life  of  Jesus  at  this  time,  we  should  have  to  be 
satisfied  with  a  life  of  Paul — material  much  more  difficult 
to  handle  and  of  far  less  value  for  this  age — as  the  first 
personal  bearer  of  the  spiritual  and  moral  values  of  early 
Christianity. 

It  does  not,  however,  appear  that  the  Christian  teacher 
will  ever  be  called  upon  to  face  the  need  for  such  a  radical 
revolution  in  connection  with  teaching  the  New  Testament 
and  the  Christian  religion.  This  radical  attack  upon  the 
fundamental  historical  character  of  the  Synoptic  Gospels 
has  far  less  prospect  of  success  to-day  than  ever,  though 
it  will  probably  always  remain  as  one  of  the  many  ques- 
tions which  ought  to  have  some  discussion  as  part  of 
the  general  problem  of  the  relation  between  Christianity 
and  History. 

It  may  now  be  taken  for  granted  that  the  Synoptic 
Gospels  do  provide  us  with  sufficient  reliable  material 
to  construct  a  historical  picture  of  Jesus  in  the  main 
features  of  His  character,  deeds  and  words.  Once  that  is 
granted,  difficulties  with  regard  to  particular  incidents 
and  sayings  can  be  overcome.  To  most  modern  teachers, 
passages  here  and  there  may  appear  to  be  unhistorical. 
It  is  scarcely  to  be  expected  that  there  will  ever  be  absolute 
agreement  in  detail  with  regard  to  what  can  and  what 
cannot  be  included  in  a  strictly  historical  life  of  Jesus. 
Every  teacher  must,  in  the  end,  fix  his  own  limits,  and 
the  only  rule  that  can  be  laid  down  is  that  naturally  no 


132    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

honest  teacher  will  repeat  as  history  what  he  does  not 
believe  to  be  history. 

This,  however,  does  not  mean  that  he  cannot  use  even 
legendary  incidents — and  that  for  historical  purposes — 
in  his  narrative  of  the  life  of  Jesus.  Such  incidents, 
when  properly  introduced  by  some  non-committal 
formula,  may,  indeed,  have  a  useful  part  to  play  in  what 
is  intended  to  be  an  historical  presentation  of  Christ. 

The  Use  of  Non-historical  Material 

Another  element  also  which  cannot  be  called  strictly 
historical  must  always  enter  into  any  attempt  to  picture 
Jesus  as  a  whole.  The  Synoptic  Gospels  after  all  only 
provide  us  with  a  somewhat  uncertain  chronological 
framework,  into  which  are  inserted  a  number  of  incidents 
and  sayings  which  vary  in  each  Gospel,  and  are  differently 
arranged  in  each.  The  whole  of  the  early  life  up  to  the 
baptism  is  practically  a  blank,  while  the  geographical, 
political,  social  and  religious  background  of  the  particular 
incidents,  as  well  as  of  the  story  as  a  whole,  is  only  barely 
indicated. 

Some  of  this  background  must,  in  any  case,  be  supplied 
in  order  to  make  the  life  and  sayings  of  Jesus  intelligible, 
and  it  can  onty  be  supplied  by  the  constructive  exercise 
of  the  well-informed  historical  imagination.  To  convey 
the  impression  of  Jesus  as  a  historical  person,  some 
attempt  must  be  made  to  describe  the  home  at  Nazareth, 
His  education.  His  work  as  a  carpenter,  the  growth  of 
His  mind,  etc. — all  the  elements  necessary  to  make  His 
first  public  appearance  natural  and  intelligible.  Of  all 
these  things  we  have  no  direct  historical  records — only 
hints  and  suggestions.  They  must  always  remain  imagi- 
native constructions,  based  on  our  general  historical 
information. 

When,  therefore,  we  speak  of  a  historical  life,  it  is 
not  meant  that  every  item  of  it  must  consist  of  undoubted 
facts  of  history  in  the  strict  and  narrow  sense.  Our 
nucleus  of  history  must  be  eked  out,  on  the  one  hand, 
by  the  introduction  of  stories  and  incidents  which  may  be 
of  doubtful   authenticity.    These   are   historical   only  in 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  133 

the  sense  that  they  were  actually  told  of  Jesus  at  a  very 
early  time,  and  perhaps  even  durmg  His  lifetime.  They 
will  naturally  be  told  as  such,  and  they  will  be  told  because 
they  help  in  some  way  to  make  the  picture  of  Jesus 
clearer  by  revealing  the  sort  of  impression  He  made  upon 
His  disciples  and  contemporaries.  They  are  true  to  Him 
even  though  they  may  not  be  true  of  Him. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  gaps  in  our  historical  material 
must,  somehow,  be  filled  by  imaginative  constructions — 
true  to  the  record  of  history,  and  based  upon  what  we 
know  from  other  sources  about  the  time,  the  land  and 
the  people  of  Jesus. 

What  is  primarily  intended,  then,  is  that  we  should 
make  a  deliberate  attempt  to  describe  the  real  life  of  a 
real  person  among  real  men  in  real  circumstances. 


THE  CONTENT  OF  THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS 

Outlines  of  the  Life  of  Jesus 

The  framework  of  the  narrative  is  already  laid  down 
for  us  in  the  Gospels,  and  it  follows  quite  simply  the 
childhood  and  youth,  the  public  ministry  in  all  its  aspects, 
the  trial,  death  and  resurrection.  The  discussion  in  detail 
of  most  of  the  educational  problems  connected  with  the 
treatment  of  the  material  content  of  the  narrative  will 
be  found  in  other  chapters.  We  shall  here  deal  mainly 
with  the  more  definitely  historical  aspects  of  the  life. 

I .  Introduction . — ^Though  Mark 's  historical  record  begins 
with  the  Baptism,  and  the  Gospels  of  Matthew  and  Luke 
bring  us  no  certain  direct  information  about  the  birth 
and  childhood  of  Jesus,  yet  we  cannot  do  without  some 
kind  of  introduction.  Such  an  introduction  might  proceed 
on  one  or  all  of  three  lines. 

We  might  start  with  some  features  of  modern  life 
that  are  familiar  to  the  children — Churches,  the  seasons  of 
Christmas  and  Easter,  the  meaning  of  the  Christian  era — 
all  leading  us  back  to  Jesus  and  creating  an  interest  in 
Him. 


134    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Secondly,  we  might  describe  the  people  of  the  Jews 
and  their  original  country — still  starting  from  modern 
times  and  going  back  to  Jesus  and  Palestine. 

Finally,  the  third  line  of  approach  might  be  through 
the  birth-narratives.  They  would  be  given  as  stories 
told  about  Jesus  with  a  view  to  deepening  the  impression 
already  made,  that  He  must  have  been  a  marvellous 
person.  The  teacher  would  not  raise  the  question  of 
their  truth  at  all  unless  it  be  definitely  put  to  him.  If 
the  question  is  asked,  he  must  take  the  responsibility  of 
explaining  the  position  as  he  sees  it,  insisting  upon  the 
value  of  the  stories  (whether  '  true  '  or  not)  as  showing 
how  great  Jesus  must  have  been  to  make  people  tell 
and  believe  such  stories  of  Him. 

For  this  purpose,  the  Birth-stories  can  be  told  in  very 
much  their  Biblical  form. 


Boyhood  and  Youth 

Following  this  should  come  some  account  of  the  child- 
hood and  youth  of  Jesus,  though  of  Him  as  an  individual 
we  only  know  that  He  lived  in  Nazareth,  and  that  probably 
He  was  a  carpenter  by  trade  like  His  father  Joseph.  It 
is,  however,  still  possible  to  reconstruct  enough  of  the 
external  life  of  a  Galilean  boy  of  that  time.  His  home 
life,  His  education  and  probable  journey  to  Jerusalem, 
to  serve  as  a  background  and  preparation  for  the  later 
experiences.  From  the  Gospels  themselves  also,  by 
reading  between  the  lines,  we  can  infer  a  good  deal  with 
regard  to  what  must  have  been  happening  in  the  inner 
life  of  Jesus  during  His  youth.  Many  of  His  parables 
are  mirrors  of  His  personal  and  early  experiences,  as  well 
as  of  the  Gospel  He  wished  to  enforce. 

Out  of  these  elements  a  plausible  and  probable  picture 
of  the  childhood  and  youth  of  Jesus  may  without  much 
difficulty  be  reconstructed.  The  purpose  of  such  a 
picture  is  to  make  the  children  feel  that  they  are  hearing 
of  the  real  life  of  a  real  man,  to  give  a  concrete  background 
to  the  public  life,  to  prepare  for  it  and  to  provide  the 
appropriate  atmosphere.  Essentially  it  will  be  an  ex- 
pansion of  the  brief  description  of  the  Gospels  :    "  Then 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  135 

He  went  down  with  them  and  came  to  Nazareth,  and  was 
always  obedient  to  them  ;  but  His  mother  carefully 
treasured  up  all  these  incidents  in  her  memory.  And  as 
Jesus  grew  older  He  gained  in  both  wisdom  and  stature, 
and  in  favour  with  God  and  man  "  (Luke  ii.  51,  52). 

Main  Elements  of  the  Public  Ministry 

2.  Public  Ministry. — In  the  public  ministry  we  come 
for  the  first  time  to  the  personal  history,  and  the  task  of 
the  teacher  is  to  use  the  material  of  the  Gospels  to  give 
as  vivid  and  as  clear  a  picture  as  possible  of  Jesus  strug- 
ghng  and  fighting  for  great  spiritual  ideals  and  values. 
There  ought  not  to  be  very  much  need  for  the  teacher  to 
talk  in  any  formal  way  of  these  spiritual  values  of  which 
Jesus  was  the  bearer.  The  values  are  in  the  history 
itself,  and  will  make  their  own  power  felt.  What  the 
teacher  has  to  do  is  to  find  the  most  effective  arrangement 
and  grouping  of  the  facts  in  order  to  give  an  interesting 
presentation  of  them  to  children  of  this  age.  Here 
some  preparatory  scenes  will  come  first  :  John  the  Baptist, 
the  Baptism  of  Jesus,  the  Temptation,  the  first  public 
appearance  at  Nazareth  and  the  calling  of  the  disciples. 
The  emphasis  is  mainly  upon  the  relation  of  Jesus  to  God, 
His  consciousness  of  Sonship,  His  sense  of  a  divine 
mission. 

Then  will  come  most  naturally  the  early  ministry  in 
Galilee,  wherein  Jesus  appears  as  the  Helper  and  Healer 
of  men  in  body  and  soul.  This  part  of  the  narrative  will 
consist  of  a  selection  of  the  stories  of  healing,  some  of  the 
parables  and  other  incidents  which  can  be  brought  into 
appropriate  relation  with  them. 

It  is  the  time  when  "  the  common  people  heard  Him 
gladly,"  and  when  the  controversies  with  the  Pharisees 
had  not  yet  arisen.  The  climax  of  the  narrative  of  the 
ministry  is  only  reached  by  attempting  to  show  Jesus 
on  one  side  fighting  strenuously  with  the  Pharisees  for 
His  ideals,  and  on  the  other  devoting  Himself  to  explain- 
ing them  to  His  own  disciples.  He  appears  as  the  Prophet 
and  the  Teacher,  and  it  is  here  undoubtedly  that  the  main 
stress  of  the  life  of  Jesus  must  always  come.     Education- 


136    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

ally,  as  we  shall  see  when  we  come  to  deal  with  adolescence, 
the  controversy  with  the  Pharisees  is  the  most  valuable 
element  in  the  Gospels  ;  but  at  this  age  we  cannot  do  very 
much  to  make  the  difference  between  the  ideals  of  Jesus 
and  those  of  the  Pharisees  clear,  yet  some  attempt  should 
even  here  be  made  to  narrate  the  main  facts  in  such  a  way 
as  to  reveal  some  of  their  significance  in  this  respect. 

The  Prophet  and  the  Teacher 

In  this  section,  therefore,  should  be  grouped  well-chosen 
examples  of  the  controversial  incidents  and  parables  as 
well  as  examples  of  the  positive  side  of  the  same  struggle 
to  maintain  the  higher  ideals  in  the  intimate  talks  of 
Jesus  with  His  disciples.  These  latter  find  their  centre  in 
the  conversation  at  Csesarea  Philippi  and  the  Transfigura- 
tion. All  this  represents  only  one  method  of  grouping 
the  incidents  of  the  Gospels,  and  it  attempts  to  combine 
a  topical  and  chronological  arrangement.  Several  other 
suggestions,  equally  justifiable,  might  be  made,  but  in  any 
case  only  a  few  examples  of  each  type  of  incident  and 
teaching  can  be  given. 

3.  The  Last  Days,  Death  and  Resurrection. — In  this 
section  of  the  narrative  the  main  incidents  will  be  the 
journey  to  Jerusalem,  the  Entry,  Cleansing  the  Temple, 
the  Passover  and  the  Last  Supper,  the  Betrayal  by  Judas, 
the  scene  in  Gethsemane,  the  Trial,  the  Crucifixion  and  the 
Resurrection.  It  is  easy  to  enumerate  them,  but  not  so 
easy  to  deal  in  any  satisfactory  way  with  the  many  educa- 
tional problems  they  present  {e.g.  the  problems  of  pre- 
senting the  Messiahship  of  Jesus,  the  character  of  Judas, 
how  to  give  any  intelligible  account  of  the  attitude  of  the 
Jewish  leaders  and  authorities,  and  how  generally  to 
present  to  children  the  story  of  the  Trial,  Death  and 
Resurrection  without  doing  more  harm  than  good).  One 
can  only  make  a  few  suggestions  with  regard  to  the  treat- 
ment of  some  of  them. 

Features  of  the  Story  in  the  Gospels 

The  story  of  the  last  days  and  death  of  Jesus  is  told  in 
the  Gospels  with  extraordinary  restraint,  simplicity  and 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  137 

dignity.  The  narrative  as  a  whole  represents  the  highest  and 
noblest  literary  achievement  of  the  Early  Church.  There 
is  nothing  else  in  the  New  Testament  to  compare  with  its 
power  to  move  the  heart  and  will,  for  it  is  the  most  effective 
portrayal  of  the  most  effective  fact  in  the  history  of  the 
world.  It  is  so  especially  for  those  who  can  refrain  from 
mixing  up  their  own  rigid  system  of  theology  with  the 
story  of  the  Gospels  ;  who  have  some  power  of  reading 
between  the  lines,  and  have  some  understanding  of  the 
circumstances  and  of  the  thoughts  and  ideals  of  the  actors 
in  the  drama.  These  facts  will  not  have  much  need  of  the 
teacher.  He  will  simply  have  to  see  that  they  approach 
the  narratives  in  the  proper  attitude  and  look  at  them 
from  the  right  point  of  view.  It  is  true  that  here  as 
elsewhere  there  are  many  literary  and  historical  problems, 
and  that  it  is  a  subordinate  part  of  the  teacher's  work 
to  meet  them  sometime  in  some  way.  In  the  older  classes, 
occasion  must  be  found  to  deal  with  them  frankly,  and  to 
interpret  even  the  legendary  elements  in  relation  to  the 
meaning  of  the  Cross  for  the  Early  Church.  Dealing  with 
the  literary  or  historical  difficulties,  however,  is  of  little 
importance  compared  with  the  main  problem,  which  is  a 
purely  educational  one. 

Makes  a  Difficult  Demand  upon  the  Teacher 

In  one  sense  it  may  well  be  said  that  in  teaching  these 
last  lessons  we  are  face  to  face  with  the  fundamental 
and  final  task  of  all  religious  instruction.  When  we  have 
thoroughly  learnt  and  taught  the  meaning  and  power  of 
the  Cross  and  the  Risen  Life,  it  might  legitimately  be 
said  that  the  Christian  lesson  has  come  to  its  natural 
end.  It  is  often  the  case,  however,  that  we  fail  to  teach 
that  final  lesson  thoroughly,  either  because  we  try  to 
teach  it  too  early,  or  because  we  do  not  prepare  the  way 
for  it  carefully  enough.  Both  arise  from  the  fact  that  in 
our  teaching  we  do  not  follow  closely  enough  the  matter 
and  method  of  the  Gospels  in  dealing  with  these  final 
scenes  in  the  story  of  Jesus.  Their  way  is  to  bring  before 
us  historical  narratives  of  concrete  incidents,  leaving  them 
to  make  their  own  impressions  on  the  mind.     We  are  so 


138    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

accustomed  to  our  own  dogmatic  interpretations  that 
we  do  not  in  our  teaching  trust  the  method  of  the  Gospels, 
but  are  always  tempted  to  read  them  in  the  light  of  the 
Pauline  Epistles.  This  does  not  mean  that  the  method 
of  the  Epistles  has  no  place  in  religious  instruction,  but 
only  that  it  has  no  place  when  we  are  in  the  region  of  the 
Gospels,  which  is  the  life  of  Jesus.  It  is  true  that  there 
is  a  dogmatic  element  in  all  the  Gospels,  but  what  is 
truer  still  is  that  it  is  practically  absent  when  the  writers 
are  dealing  with  the  trial  and  death  of  Jesus.  That  is  a 
true  educational  instinct,  and  if  we  are  to  follow  it,  our 
lessons  must  consist  of  an  attempt  to  bring  our  pupils 
directly  under  the  influence  of  the  facts  themselves,  and 
to  let  the  facts  speak  for  themselves  to  the  human  heart. 
The  Gospels  themselves  make  it  very  plain  what  this 
will  mean,  for  they  give  the  story  of  the  Cross  as  the 
climax  of  the  life  of  Jesus  and  of  the  hard-fought  struggle 
between  Him  and  His  enemies.  With  every  incident 
as  it  comes,  the  convictions  of  Jesus  with  regard  to  God 
and  His  Kingdom  are  more  and  more  sharply  contrasted 
with  those  of  the  people  around  Him.  The  real  character 
of  the  opposing  forces  is  more  and  more  clearly  revealed. 
The  time  for  compromise  is  past,  and  both  sides  pursue 
their  purpose  to  the  bitter  end.  There  is  no  evading 
a  final  decision  between  them. 


Dramatic  Elements  in  the  Story 

If  Jesus  in  utter  faithfulness  to  His  faith  goes  forward 
undismayed  to  take  upon  Himself  the  final  consequences 
of  that  faith.  His  enemies  also  become  utterly  reckless 
in  the  pursuit  of  their  purpose,  and  never  falter  in  their 
campaign  of  hate.  Such  is  the  dramatic  impression  which 
these  last  scenes  made  upon  the  minds  of  the  early  dis- 
ciples. To  transmit  that  impression  faithfully  is  the 
central  task  of  the  teacher. 

The  Gospels,  it  is  true,  show  us  that  the  facts  have 
to  some  extent  been  edited,  but  the  editing  has  always 
taken  what  we  may  call  a  psychological  direction.  That 
is  to  say,  the  Early  Church  so  moulded  the  narrative  as 
to  bring  out  more  dramatically  still  the  contest  between 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  139 

fundamentally  different  ideals  ;  and  in  their  hands  the 
various  actors  have  become  almost  universal  types  of 
the  different  attitudes  involved  in  such  a  contest.  They 
have  thus  made  Jesus,  the  religious  leaders,  Judas,  Pilate, 
Peter  and  the  others  stand  out  before  us  as  great  typical 
figures  in  the  universal  struggle  for  and  against  God  and 
His  kingdom.  They  do  not  seem  to  have  done  any  in- 
justice to  the  facts  in  this  way,  for  they  have  only  brought 
out  more  clearly  the  meaning  which  was  inherent  in  them. 
The  redemptive  power  is  in  the  history,  if  only  the  mind 
and  the  heart  can  be  brought  directly  and  humbly  face 
to  face  with  it. 

Educational  Dangers 

Narrating  the  life  of  Jesus  for  childhood,  the  first  task 
of  the  teacher  is  to  consider  how  much  of  this  historical 
and  psychological  meaning  can  be  effectively  brought 
home  to  the  child.  The  concrete  and  dramatic  story  of 
the  Cross  and  its  external  incidents  are  such  as  will  be 
easily  followed  with  interest  and  intelligence  by  them. 
It  is  not  so  easy  to  give  the  right  impression  of  the  motives 
and  inner  experiences  involved.  It  is  difficult,  especially, 
to  do  anything  like  justice  to  the  enemies  of  Jesus.  There 
is  nothing  in  the  experience  of  the  children  which  can 
help  them  to  understand  why  the  Jews  should  put  a  man 
like  Jesus  to  death.  Their  actions  will  seem  to  be  utterly 
without  sense  or  reason.  That  is  one  of  the  dangers  of 
telling  the  story  of  the  Cross  too  early.  Some  attempt 
must  already  have  been  made  to  explain  in  some  simple 
fashion  the  contrast  between  the  popular,  national  and 
military  ideas  of  the  Messiah  with  the  peaceful  and 
spiritual  conception  of  Jesus  Himself  with  regard  to  the 
Kingdom  of  God.  This  will  help  the  children  to  under- 
stand how  Jesus  came  to  be  condemned  for  blasphemy  ; 
and  though  they  will  not  be  able  to  follow  the  deeper 
motives  of  the  leaders,  the  tragedy  may  become  to  some 
extent  intelligible  to  them. 

Method  and  Aims  of  the  Teacher 

The  method  to  be  adopted  by  the  teacher  also  requires 
a  great  deal  of  consideration.     He  must  either  tell  the 


140    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

story  or  read  it  from  the  Gospels,  or  a  selection  from  them. 
The  difficulty  about  telling  the  story  freely  in  this  instance 
is,  that  the  composition  of  the  story  in  such  a  way  as  to 
reproduce  the  spirit,  atmosphere  and  impression  of  the 
Gospel  narrative  is  a  very  difficult  and  dangerous  task. 
It  is  not  only  that  its  composition  by  the  teacher  means 
a  great  deal  of  careful  thinking,  for  that  could  be  over- 
come here  as  elsewhere.  The  great  danger  is  that  our 
narrative  should  become  sentimental  instead  of  repre- 
senting the  strong,  moving  pathos  of  the  scene.  On  the 
other  hand,  the  difficulty  about  reading  the  story^  in  the 
Gospels  is  that  we  need  a  picture  which  can  only  be 
painted  by  fusing  together  elements  from  them  all,  and 
there  is  a  danger  of  destroying  the  best  impression  by 
passing  to  and  fro  from  one  to  another.  But  whether 
he  decides  on  telling  the  story  of  the  Cross  or  reading  it, 
there  are  some  points  which  the  teacher  must  bear  in 
mind  throughout. 

(a)  His  great  aim  should  be  to  bring  the  children 
face  to  face  with  Jesus  as  He  goes  to  His  death,  and  to 
let  nothing  stand  between  the  story  itself  and  the  heart 
of  the  child.  Let  him  stand  for  once  directly  under  the 
influence  of  the  human  tragedy  and  triumph  of  the 
scenes  themselves  as  elements  in  human  history,  freed 
from  all  theological  dogma,  and  especially  without  the 
intrusion  of  the  dogmatic  temper. 

(b)  In  particular,  we  need  to  be  warned  against  letting 
the  figure  of  '  the  Lamb  of  God,'  passively  suffering  His 
doom,  have  too  much  control  over  the  description.  Let 
the  heroic,  majestic  side  of  the  innocence  of  Jesus  be 
emphasized. 

(c)  So  far  as  possible  also,  it  should  become  clear  how 
the  attitude  and  words  of  Jesus  bring  before  us  the  whole 
meaning  of  His  hfe  and  Gospel.  Even  now  it  is  the  filial 
trust  towards  God  and  the  brotherly  service  of  others 
that  mark  Him  and  His  words.  '  Father  '  is  still  His 
name  for  God,  and  it  is  of  others  that  He  thinks  and  not 
of  Himself.  This  may,  after  all,  be  the  best  way  of  saving 
the  children  from  a  mere  ignorant  and  unreasoning  hate 
of  the  enemies  of  Jesus.  "  Father,  forgive  them,  for  they 
know  not  what  they  do." 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  141 

Educational  Problem  of  the  Resurrection 

The  story  of  the  Resurrection  presents  a  very  different 
problem,  which  is  dealt  with  elsewhere.  So  far  as  their 
religious  and  educational  value  is  concerned,  these  narra- 
tives belong  essentially  to  the  life  and  experience  not  of 
Jesus  but  of  the  disciples.  Whatever  view  we  take  of 
their  historical  character,  they  are  a  picture  of  the  faith 
of  the  disciples  and  a  record  of  their  religious  experi- 
ences. As  the  Birth-stories  form  the  introduction, 
so  the  Resurrection-stories  form  the  conclusion  of  the 
Life  of  Jesus — both  of  them  primarily  pictures  of  the 
tremendous  significance  of  the  Personality  of  Jesus  for 
His  disciples.  Their  proper  educational  place  is  as  an 
instrument  for  impressing  the  supreme  value  of  the  per- 
sonality and  character  of  Jesus  upon  the  mind,  and  the 
impossibility  of  thinking  that  death  could  destroy  Him. 
The  first  and  main  task  of  the  teacher  is  through  them  to 
create  and  strengthen  the  convictions  that  Jesus  cannot 
fail  to  carry  through  His  ideals  and  purposes,  that  God 
rules  even  through  death,  that  Jesus  offers  a  permanent 
spiritual  communion  with  Himself  to  His  disciples  and 
that  eternal  life  is  in  that  communion.  Before  and  after 
death  He  is  the  same  in  character,  in  purpose,  in  love  and 
in  power.  Whatever  there  is  in  these  narratives  which 
can  help  the  teacher  to  make  these  convictions  real  and 
living,  it  is  His  business  to  use  for  that  purpose.  Some 
of  these  narratives  He  will  not  be  able  to  use  at  all ;  some 
He  will  use  as  Wonder-stories  in  early  childhood  ;  and 
some  He  will  use  here  and  elsewhere  in  trying  to  make  the 
moral  and  religious  experience^ — the  inner  history  of  the 
disciples  between  Calvary  and  Pentecost — real  and  clear 
to  His  pupils. 

5 
MORAL  AND  RELIGIOUS  APPRECIATION 

So  far,  we  have  been  dealing  mainly  with  the  historical 
elements  of  our  presentation  of  Christ  for  childhood. 
Naturally,  we  are  not  teaching  the  life  of  Jesus  for  the 


142    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

sake  of  the  merely  external  dead  facts  of  history  without 
any  appreciation  of  their  moral,  spiritual  and  intellectual 
value.  We  must  try  to  let  the  facts  reveal  the  spiritual 
values  of  which  Jesus  was  historically  the  bearer,  but  we 
need  to  be  reminded  that  we  cannot  expect  at  this  period 
a  full  and  adequate  appreciation  of  these  values.  There 
must,  therefore,  always  be  some  subjective  element  in 
every  teacher's  attempt  to  teach  the  life  of  Jesus.  That 
cannot  be  avoided  and  should  be  frankly  recognized. 
Any  and  every  presentation  of  Christ  implies  to  some 
extent  even  the  particular  theological  interpretation  of 
the  teacher  Himself.  We  should,  however,  honestly  try 
to  let  the  facts  speak  for  themselves  ;  we  should  try  to 
distinguish  between  the  moral  and  religious  appreciation 
which  is  essential  and  the  theological  construction  that 
may  follow  for  us  ;  and  we  should  in  any  case  try  to  make 
clear  to  ourselves  the  main  spiritual  values  which  we  wish 
deliberately  to  associate  with  Jesus  in  the  minds  of  the 
children. 

Love  for  Jesus  and  its  Qualities 

All  will  agree  that  the  first  aim  of  the  Christian  teacher 
must  be  to  awaken  love  for  Jesus  and  trust  in  Him  and 
what  He  represents  in  so  far  as  a  child  of  nine  or  ten  is 
capable  of  such  an  attitude.  When,  however,  we  speak 
of  love  for  Jesus,  we  must  remember  that  if  it  is  to  be 
a  moral  factor — strong  and  healthy — and  not  merely  a 
cheap  and  enervating  sentiment,  it  must  be  an  intelligent 
love.  That  means  to  say,  it  must  be  generated  by  and  it 
must  grow  with  an  increasing  knowledge  of  Jesus.  To 
love  Jesus  means  to  know  Him.  It  is  a  moral  apprecia- 
tion of  Him,  of  what  He  is  and  what  He  represents  to 
some  degree  or  other. 

It  must  also  be  a  reverent  love.  That  means  to  say, 
to  love  Jesus  is  to  love  One  who  stands  far  above  us  in 
word  and  deed,  in  character  and  spirit.  To  love  Him 
means  to  feel  His  power,  to  bow  to  His  authority,  to  obey 
the  call  of  His  love.  Underneath  and  behind  our  love  for 
Jesus  there  must  therefore  be  a  realization  of  His  love 
for  men  to  make  it  intelligent  ;   and  to  make  it  reverent 


THE  LIFE  OF  JESUS  FOR  CHILDHOOD  143 

there  must  be  some  realization  of  the  authority  and  power 
of  His  love  to  the  uttermost  in  the  Cross. 


Based  on  the  Love  of  Jesus 

Naturally,  it  is  only  a  small  part  of  this  end  that  we 
can  hope  to  achieve  through  our  first  presentation  of 
Christ  to  childhood.  On  the  other  hand,  we  must  re- 
member that  we  are  now  laying  down  the  main  conditions 
upon  which  our  ultimate  success  will  largely  depend. 
That  reveals  at  once  the  kind  of  picture  we  must  try  to 
give.  It  must  be  one  which  will  discover,  though  only  in 
an  elementary  way,  the  main  spiritual  values  which 
became  focused  in  the  life  and  death  of  Jesus — and 
especially  the  reality  and  utter  generosity  of  His  love. 
It  is  necessary  and  inevitable  that  many  different  pictures 
of  Jesus  should  be  drawn  by  different  hands.  One  may 
seek  chiefly  to  reveal  His  beauty,  while  another  enshrines 
His  truth  and  another  still  His  righteousness  ;  but  they 
must  all,  to  be  true  at  all,  reveal  the  sovereignty  of  His 
redeeming  love — the  sovereignty  and  the  reality  of  it 
in  His  spirit,  character,  deeds  and  words.  His  beauty, 
truth  and  righteousness  are  closely  woven  into  the  pattern 
of  His  love. 

This,  then,  is  the  supreme  and  first  condition  of  any 
and  every  effective  presentation  of  the  Christ.  This  also, 
combined  with  the  moral  needs,  capacities  and  interests 
of  childhood,  will  suggest  the  other  characteristics  of  the 
child's  life  of  Christ  that  we  need. 


Moral  Features  of  the  Boy's  Life  of  Jesus 

There  can,  indeed,  be  little  hesitation  as  to  the 
dominant  notes  that  should  ring  through  the  story  of 
Jesus  in  the  ear  and  soul  of  boyhood.  They  are  heroism 
and  courage,  the  spirit  of  adventure  and  the  spirit  of 
joy.  When  the  highest  love  takes  up  the  harp  of  life, 
these  are  the  chords  it  strikes.  It  is  true  that  it  is  in 
adolescence  that  this  love  will  come  to  its  own  com- 
pletel}^  and  decisively,  but  the  heroic,  adventurous  and 
joyful  elements  that  wait  upon  it  to  do  its  bidding  must 


144    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

be  there  to  welcome  it  when  it  comes  in  its  glory.  It  is 
the  moral  heroism  of  the  faith  of  Jesus  that  needs  most 
emphasis  and  illustration  now,  and  there  is  a  wealth  of 
material  in  the  Gospels  for  the  purpose. 

It  ought  also  to  be  clear  that  our  picture  of  Jesus  for 
this  period  should  be  frankly  and  thoroughly  human — 
full  of  genuine  human  experiences,  of  struggle,  tempta- 
tion and  growth,  of  doubt  and  perplexity  as  well  as  exulta- 
tion and  triumph,  representing  the  ebb  and  flow  of  the 
spirit  within  the  steadfast  unity  of  gracious  and  holy 
purpose. 

This,  of  course,  by  no  means  excludes  the  growth  of  a 
wider  and  deeper  appreciation  of  Jesus  later  on  as  the 
bearer  of  divine  values,  nor  of  a  fuller  theological  inter- 
pretation of  His  person  and  work.  It  is  the  necessary 
foundation  and  preparation  for  them,  but  we  must  now 
be  satisfied  with  fostering  in  an  elementary  form  some 
moral  and  religious  interpretation  corresponding  to  the 
needs,  capacities  and  interests  of  childhood. 

BOOKS 

Blake  (Nora). — Stones  of  Jesus.  (London,  "  Teachers  and  Taught.") 
FoRBUSH  (W.   B.).~The  Boy's  Life  of  Christ.     (London :  Hodder  & 

Stoughton.) 
Gillie  (R.  C). — The  Story  of  Stories.     (London  :  A.  &  C.  Black.) 
Lee  (Hetty). — Lessons  on  the  Life  of  Our  Lord  Jesus  Christ.     (London  : 

National  Society.) 
NiEBERGALL  (F.). — Jesus  im  Unterricht.     (Gottingen,  1910.) 
Reynolds  (F.  B.)  and  Waller  (H.  I.). — Jesus  the  Hero.     (London, 

"Teachers  and  Taught.") 


CHAPTER  VIII 

THE   SYNOPTIC   PRESENTATION    OF   CHRIST   FOR 
ADOLESCENCE 

Adolescent  Life  and  its  Features. — The  Decisive  Stage  in  Education 
— Adolescence  and  the  New  Testament. 

The  Literary  Study  of  the  New  Testament. — The  Books  of  the  New 
Testament — The  Need  for  Educational  Editions — Three  Aspects 
of  the  Gospels. 

The  Character  and  Teaching  of  Jesus. — Study  of  Jesus  for  Adolescence 
— Jesus  as  a  Teacher — Jesus  in  Controversy — The  Jewish  Leaders 
— Contrasted  with  Jesus — The  Moral  and  Religious  Experience 
of  Jesus  and  its  Fundamental  Features  —  Social  Spirit  and 
Activity  of  Jesus. 

Life  and  Thought  of  the  Primitive  Church. — The  Synoptic  Presenta- 
tion as  a  Whole — Relation  to  the  Life  of  the  Primitive  Church 
— The  Origin  of  the  Church  and  Christian  Theology. 

The  Synoptic  Gospels  and  Modern  Problems. — Modern  Valuation  of 
the  Sjmoptic  Presentation — Its  Relation  to  Living  Issues. 


ADOLESCENT  LIFE  AND  ITS  FEATURES 

Adolescence  the  Decisive  Stage  in  Education 

It  has  already  been  said  in  many  forms  that  the  cul- 
minating point  in  our  moral  and  religious  instruction 
and  education  is  to  be  found  in  adolescence.  Then  comes 
normally  the  decisive  experience,  when  the  vision  and 
the  meaning  of  the  spiritual  world  of  which  Jesus  is  the 
supreme  revealer  flash  upon  the  soul  of  youth  and  may 
make  or  mar  his  destiny.  This  may  come  suddenly  or 
gradually.  We  may  call  it  '  conversion  '  or  describe  it 
by  any  other  name  equally  unfitting  and  inadequate. 
In  any  case,  its  reality  and  gravity  in  some  form,  as  a 

10 


146    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

natural  and  inevitable  feature  of  healthy  adolescence,  is 
undoubted.  It  is  a  well-known  point  in  any  effective 
and  successful  educational  process,  and  on  a  small  scale 
is  an  essential  factor  in  every  process  of  learning.  In 
Herbartian  language,  it  is  the  culmination  of  the  process 
of  apperception.  It  is  the  point  at  which  all  the  varied 
elements  which  have  somehow  found  a  place  in  the  mind 
become  fused  into  an  illuminating  unity,  acquire  living, 
transforming  power  and  enter  into  control  for  the  time 
being — in  fact,  become  educationally  effective. 

*  Conversion  '  is  thus  a  critical  stage — a  crisis  in 
education.  Adolescence  is  its  natural  home  among  the 
periods  of  human  growth,  though  it  may  sometimes  be 
paralleled  also  in  that  transition-time  between  infancy 
and  childhood  which  often  anticipates  on  a  smaller  scale 
many  of  the  features  of  adolescence.  In  many  cases 
this  experience  might  rightly  be  called  religious  conversion, 
even  when  the  specific  religious  element  is  not  central. 
It  combines  in  itself  three  elements,  namely,  a  sense  of 
the  inadequacy  of  past  experience,  an  effort  to  look  at 
all  things  from  the  new  and  more  unified  point  of  view 
and  an  element  of  reverence — of  all  which  the  religious 
sense  of  sin,  the  exercise  of  prayer  and  the  act  of  worship 
are  the  crowning  expression. 

Adolescence,  then,  is  the  most  critical  period  of  human 
growth.  It  is  the  time  of  decision,  the  age  of  ideals  and 
of  the  conflict  of  ideals,  the  stage  of  strenuous  struggle 
for  a  higher  unity — and  at  the  same  time  it  is  the  age 
of  self-assertion  and  of  a  keen  desire  for  wider  communion 
in  larger  social  groups  and  communities.  It  is  the  flower- 
ing time  of  love  and  the  period  when  the  sense  of  personal 
responsibility  awakes. 

Adolescence  and  the  New  Testament 

Because  it  is  all  this,  it  is  also  the  one  great  oppor- 
tunity of  the  New  Testament  with  its  Gospel  of  love 
and  ideals,  of  the  value  of  the  individual  and  of  personal 
loyalty  to  Christ,  of  social  service  to  men  and  loving  trust 
in  God  the  Father. 

So  far,  we  have  only  been  able  to  prepare  the  way, 


THE  SYNOPTIC  PRESENTATION  OF  CHRIST        147 

in  infancy  and  in  childhood,  for  the  understanding  of  this 
Gospel  in  its  full  sense.  Now  comes  the  time  for  the 
presentation  of  its  essential  qualities  and  power,  the  time 
to  make  its  urgent  call  ring  clear  in  such  a  way  as  to  demand 
a  decision  for  or  against  it. 

The  whole  material  of  the  New  Testament  is,  therefore, 
here  in  place — its  living  history  and  its  classic  literature, 
its  supreme  ideals  and  its  highest  motives,  its  ethics,  its 
religion  and  its  theology,  its  epoch-making  personalities 
and  the  community  of  its  saints,  its  Kingdom  of  God 
and  its  crucified,  triumphant  Saviour.  More  than  all, 
here  is  the  time  when  all  these  should  be  brought  to  bear 
decisively  upon  the  living  issues  of  the  life  of  modern 
youth. 


THE  LITERARY  STUDY  OF  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT 

It  is  clear,  therefore,  that  a  mere  literary  and  historical 
study  of  the  New  Testament  will  not  suffice  here.  It  is, 
however,  a  very  necessary  preparation  for  the  deeper  call 
of  the  New  Testament.  Youth  is  in  search  of  reality, 
and  of  reliable  knowledge  too,  and  as  critical  of  theories 
as  he  is  of  conventions.  His  study  of  the  New  Testament 
cannot  be  too  critical  in  preparation  for  a  keener,  fuller 
and  more  positive  appreciation  of  its  personalities,  move- 
ments, ideals  and  forces. 

He  will,  first  of  all,  study  its  books — the  Gospels  of 
Mark,  Matthew  and  Luke,  the  Book  of  Acts  ;  and  then 
the  Letters  of  Paul  ;  then  Hebrews  and  the  Johannine 
Literature  ;  and  the  rest  when  he  finds  the  time. 

The  Literature  of  the  New  Testament 

It  is  to  be  hoped,  however,  that  he  will  be  able  to  read 
them  all  sooner  or  later  in  some  better  and  more  attrac- 
tive form  than  our  ordinary  editions  of  the  Bible,  and 
also  with  some  more  effective  help  than  the  conventional 
commentary.  Most  modern  commentaries  seem  to  have 
been  expressly  written  for  the  age  of  senile  decay  and 


148    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

not  for  living  and  growing  youth.  They  plod  on  doggedly 
from  dead  phrase  to  dead  idea,  evading  dexterously  most 
of  the  difficulties  of  youth  and  explaining  cumbrously 
all  that  is  self-evident  or  obvious.  For  purposes  of 
educative  instruction  they  are  mostly  barren  and  useless, 
and  they  only  interfere  with  the  light  that  breaks  from 
the  soul  behind  the  written  page. 

We  are  in  urgent  need  of  a  series  of  educational  editions 
of  the  books  of  the  New  Testament, with  new  and  intelligible 
translations,  which  ought  to  make  most  of  the  conven- 
tional commentary  needless.  We  need  these  as  a  sub- 
stitute for  the  usual  popular  and  Sunday-school  editions 
which  are  only  the  bulkier  commentaries  in  miniature. 
In  the  religious  instruction  of  youth  far  too  much  time 
and  energy  are  spent  on  details  that  do  not  matter,  with 
the  result  that  the  weightier  matters  of  the  Gospel  do 
not  get  the  attention  which  is  their  due. 

In  this  chapter  we  are  only  concerned  with  the  study 
of  the  Synoptic  Gospels,  which  must  naturally  accompany 
the  Synoptic  presentation  of  Christ  for  adolescence.  The 
study  of  the  Letters  of  Paul,  his  personality,  his  work 
and  his  presentation  of  Christ,  and  also  that  of  the 
Johannine  Literature  and  type  of  thought  and  life,  will 
be  discussed  in  later  chapters. 

There  are  three  aspects  of  the  study  of  the  Synoptic 
Gospels  which  ought  to  form  part  of  the  Biblical  instruc- 
tion during  the  periods  of  early  and  middle  adolescence  : 

Three  Aspects  of  the  Gospels 

1 .  Each  of  the  Gospels  ought  to  be  studied  separately, 
but  more  especially  Matthew  and  Luke,  keeping  in  mind 
particularly  their  different  aims  and  methods  and  the 
peculiarities  of  their  several  presentations  of  Christ. 
This  should  be  rather  a  rapid  reading  and  survey  than 
a  detailed  exegesis.  Several  readings  of  the  text  from 
different  points  of  view  are  better  than  a  wearisome 
plodding  through  verse  after  verse. 

2.  There  should  be  a  Synoptic  study  of  the  three 
Gospels  in  order  to  examine  the  literary  and  historical 
relation  between  them,  their  common  basis  in  Mark,  the 


THE  SYNOPTIC  PRESENTATION  OF  CHRIST       149 

use  by  Matthew  and  Luke  of  an  early  collection  of  the 
Sayings  of  Jesus,  their  different  methods  of  selecting, 
arranging  and  dealing  with  their  material  as  well  as  the 
different  forms  they  give  to  the  words  of  Jesus,  all  of  which 
reveals  the  peculiar  tendencies  and  interests  of  each.  A 
course  of  lessons  arranged  definitely  with  these  ends  in 
view  would  prove  an  interesting  variant  of  the  ordinary 
Biblical  instruction,  and  would  provide  at  the  same  time 
a  good  introduction  to  the  third  study. 

3.  Finally,  there  should  be  a  critical  study  of  the 
character  and  history  of  the  Synoptic  Gospels — literary 
and  historical — intended  to  describe  more  particularly  the 
history  of  the  material,  from  its  source  in  oral  tradition 
through  early  written  collections  to  the  present  form  of 
the  Gospels  ;  also  their  general  literary  form  and  language 
in  relation  to  the  language  and  types  of  literature  extant 
in  their  time,  including  the  origin,  history  and  purpose  of 
such  characteristic  literary  forms  as  parables,  for  instance. 


3 

THE  CHARACTER  AND  TEACHING  OF  JESUS 

This  study  of  books  should  lead  to  a  more  intimate 
and  appreciative  knowledge  of  the  thought,  life  and  per- 
sonalities of  the  New  Testament  ;  and  the  study  of  the 
Synoptic  Gospels  should  be  accompanied  or  followed  by 

1 .  An  elementary  but  systematic  study  of  the  character 
and  teaching  of  Jesus  on  the  one  hand,  and  on  the  other 
hand  by 

2.  A  fairly  complete  consideration  of  the  Synoptic 
presentation  of  Christ  as  a  whole. 

Study  of  Jesus  for  Adolescence 

Provision  has  already  been  made  during  childhood 
for  dealing  with  the  more  or  less  external  record  of  the 
Life  of  Jesus  with  some  necessary  indication  of  the  growth 
of  His  experience  and  some  examples  of  the  characteristic 
content  and  methods  of  His  teaching.     Now  towards  the 


150    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

end  of  early  adolescence  (13-16)  come  the  need  and 
opportunity  for  a  fuller  description  and  a  deeper  apprecia- 
tion of  the  moral  and  religious  meaning  of  the  life,  work 
and  character  of  the  Master.  This  comprises  the  urgent 
material  of  the  New  Testament — the  material  most  likely, 
so  far  as  both  its  content  and  form  are  concerned,  to 
prepare  the  will  for  the  great  choice  that  is  usually  made 
during  these  years,  and  also  to  impel  the  will  to  make  that 
choice. 

Such  a  study  ought  to  try  to  do  three  things  : 

(a)  It  ought  to  give  some  clear  description  of  the  main 
elements  in  the  inner  life  and  experience  of  Jesus — His 
sense  of  the  near  presence  of  the  Father,  His  free  obedience 
as  Son,  His  intimate  personal  knowledge  of  God. 

(b)  It  ought  to  describe  and  illustrate  these  as  revealing 
and  expressing  themselves  in  His  '  Messianic  '  mission  and 
His  persistent  and  generous  service  of  men  to  the  utter- 
most sacrifice  of  the  Cross. 

(c)  It  ought  to  give  a  fairly  full  description  of  Jesus 
in  His  threefold  teaching  capacity — in  His  relation  to  His 
people  in  general,  to  the  Pharisees  and  to  His  disciples. 

Jesus  as  a  Teacher 

For  the  purposes  of  this  instruction,  the  dominant 
element  in  such  a  course  of  study  should  be  the  religious 
and  ethical  teaching  of  Jesus — but  the  teaching  in  close 
relation  to  the  character  and  personality  on  the  one  hand 
and  to  the  deeds  and  work  of  Jesus  on  the  other.  It  is 
not  an  abstract  discussion  that  is  meant,  but  an  attempt  to 
give  a  living  presentation  of  the  historical  Jesus,  discover- 
ing and  revealing  the  supreme  values  of  the  spiritual 
world  in  spirit,  word  and  deed — the  word  being  the  clearest 
and  most  intelligible  expression,  interpreting  both  the 
deed  and  the  spirit.  We  may,  therefore,  take  the  section 
on  the  teaching  of  Jesus  as  representative  of  the  whole 
course . 

No  study  of  the  Gospels  in  adolescence  could  be 
complete  Vv^ithout  an  adequate  study  of  Jesus  as  a  Teacher 
in  His  methods  and  principles,  including  both  the  form 
and  content  of  His  teaching.     The  form  of  His  teaching  is 


THE  SYNOPTIC  PRESENTATION  OF  CHRIST        151 

as  significant  as  its  content.  His  parables  are  so  char- 
acteristic that  we  shall  have  to  give  them  a  separate 
discussion.  But  His  teaching  life  in  the  open  air,  His  free 
and  genial  intercourse  with  men  of  all  kinds,  His  intimate 
communion  with  Nature  and  the  use  He  made  of  it,  His 
keen  observation  of  men  and  things,  His  deep  insight 
into  ordinary  human  nature  and  His  sympathy  with  the 
ordinary  work  and  experiences  of  men.  His  respect  for 
women  and  children.  His  intimate  touch  and  preoccupation 
with  individual  men.  His  use  of  the  Synagogue  and  His 
deep  and  intimate  knowledge  of  the  Old  Testament — all 
these  things  are  essential  to  the  genius  of  Jesus,  significant 
features  of  His  teaching  and  its  methods  and  a  revelation 
of  His  whole  spirit.  They  also  form  the  best  introduction 
to  the  content  of  His  teaching  for  the  people  in  general  in 
His  parables. 

Jesus  in  Controversy 

For  educational  purposes  at  this  time,  however,  the 
most  important  element  in  the  teaching  of  Jesus  and  the 
most  valuable  feature  in  the  Gospels  is  represented  by 
the  controversy  with  the  Pharisees  and  the  other  parties 
of  the  time,  for  in  this  conflict  of  ideals  we  have  the  old 
and  the  new  side  by  side  in  concrete  forms.  They  are 
presented  in  dramatic  contrast  again  and  again  until  the 
conflict  finds  its  consummation  in  the  Cross.  For  the 
effective  presentation  of  an  ideal,  as  for  its  history  and 
preservation,  the  point  at  which  it  enters  for  the  first  time 
into  a  life-and-death  struggle  with  its  predecessor  in  control 
is  the  most  dynamic  and  the  most  decisive.  It  is  then 
that  its  moral  value  is  most  clearly  revealed  and  is  also 
considerably  increased  by  becoming  identified  with  the 
personality  who  is  its  bearer  in  the  conflict.  That  is  why 
the  controversy  with  the  Pharisees  must  be  a  central 
element  in  the  moral  instruction  of  the  adolescent.  It  is, 
in  effect,  the  most  dramatic  representation  in  all  history 
of  the  central  struggle  of  adolescence  itself,  namely,  the 
struggle  to  grow  out  of  the  bondage  of  the  law  into  the 
freedom  of  the  spirit.  It  is  the  destined  struggle  of  youth 
in  every  generation  to  burst  the  bonds  of  tradition  and 
march  into  a  fuller  and  more  independent  fife. 


152    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

It  becomes  one  of  the  main  tasks  of  the  teacher,  there- 
fore, to  attempt  once  more  to  use  the  material  of  the 
Gospels  in  order  to  make  this  struggle  real,  intelligible  and 
urgent  to  the  heart  and  mind  and  will  of  youth.  Now  it 
is  not  so  much  the  external  course  of  the  controversy 
that  he  must  bend  all  his  intellectual  and  spiritual  energies 
to  depict,  but  its  inner  meaning,  its  moral  significance,  its 
strong  contrast  of  two  spiritual  worlds,  one  lower  and  one 
higher,  one  a  creed  outworn,  the  other  a  newly  born  spirit 
of  life.  The  condemnation  and  death  of  Jesus  at  the 
hands  of  the  Jewish  authorities  do  not  represent  the  defeat 
of  the  new  life  but  its  conquest,  which  is  marked  by  the 
'  power  of  His  Resurrection.' 

The  Jewish  Leaders 

In  order  to  bring  out  this  meaning,  the  teacher  will 
more  than  ever  be  called  upon  to  make  some  effort  to 
describe  fairly  and  adequately  the  main  features  of  the 
Pharisaic  Ethic,  Religion  and  Theology  on  the  one  hand, 
and  on  the  other  hand  to  make  some  analysis  of  the 
consciousness  of  Jesus. 

He  will  now  find  plenty  of  guidance  for  both  purposes  in 
recent  literature  on  the  subject.  He  must,  however,  try 
to  get  rid  of  many  of  the  traditional  prejudices  against 
the  Pharisees,  and  do  justice  both  to  their  defects  and  to 
their  merits.  There  is  no  need  to  underestimate  the  value 
of  their  contribution  to  the  life  and  thought  of  their 
people  and  the  world  in  order  to  guard  the  superiority 
and  infinite  value  of  the  spirit,  attitude,  life  and 
principles  of  Jesus.  After  all,  the  Pharisees  represented 
the  cleanest,  the  most  honest,  the  most  earnest  and 
conscientious  element  in  the  life  of  their  time.  Their 
spiritual  pride,  their  narrow  nationalism,  their  rigid 
orthodoxy,  their  casuistical  calculations  and  their  legal- 
istic doctrines  were  the  dark  shadows  cast  by  their  real 
and  deep  sense  of  the  absolute  validity  of  the  Law  as 
God's  will,  by  their  consciousness  that  their  people  had 
an  urgent  message  from  God  for  the  world  at  large,  and 
by  their  intense  desire  to  protect  that  message  from  the 
unholy   touch    of   profane    hands.     Far    better    all    their 


THE  SYNOPTIC  PRESENTATION  OF  CHRIST       153 

earnest  narrowness  than  the  merely  opportunist,  worldly 
and  indifferent  breadth  and  shallow  culture  of  the 
Sadducees.  Far  better  their  misguided  retreat  from  the 
touch  of  the  world — which  was  the  dark  shadow  cast  by 
their  dependence  upon  God  alone — than  the  mad,  military 
and  political  ambitions  of  the  Zealots  with  their  faith  in 
brute  force. 

Contrasted  with  Jesus 

Over  against  all  these  stands  Jesus  in  direct  opposition 
to  the  Sadducaic  opportunist,  to  the  Zealot  nationalist, 
to  the  ascetic  Essene,  as  well  as  to  the  exclusive  Pharisee — 
refusing  to  become  either  a  mere  politician,  a  reckless 
revolutionary,  a  useless  hermit  or  a  plaster  saint.  The 
faith  and  hope  and  love  which  kept  Him  from  depen- 
dence on  the  arm  of  flesh,  delivered  Him  from  the  snares 
of  political  intrigue,  gave  Him  courage  also  not  to  flee 
from  the  world's  responsibility  and  work  and  saved  Him 
from  spiritual  pride  and  self-righteous  exclusiveness. 
There  was  really  no  choice  for  Jesus  between  the  monastic 
Essene,  with  more  '  holiness  '  than  usefulness  ;  the 
Zealot  nationalist,  with  more  zeal  than  sense  ;  the  aristo- 
cratic Sadducee,  prouder  of  his  lineage  than  of  his  loyalty 
either  to  his  people  or  to  his  religion  ;  and  the  legal- 
minded  Pharisee,  fuller  of  theological  lore  than  of  practical 
love.  Jesus  was  great  enough  to  see  the  good  in  them  all 
and  perhaps  to  learn  of  them  all — but  also  to  repudiate 
them  all.  He  had  the  courage  to  strike  a  way  of  His  own. 
He  was  as  wide  in  His  outlook  as  the  Sadducee,  but  with 
an  infinitely  greater  love  for  His  country  and  people.  He 
was  as  uncompromising  in  His  conviction  and  devotion 
to  God's  will  as  the  Pharisee,  but  with  an  infinitely  greater 
comprehension  and  wider  tolerance.  He  was  as  much  a 
man  of  the  people  as  any  Zealot,  but  with  much  more 
sanity  and  balance  of  mind  and  with  an  infinitely  longer 
patience.  He  had  as  much  faith  in  perfect  purity  as  the 
Essene,  but  with  an  infinitely  deeper  insight  into  its  moral 
quality  and  spiritual  inwardness. 

To  explain  and  enforce  these  contrasts,  the  teacher 
for  this  age  must  do  his  utmost  to  penetrate  into  the 
innermost   secrets   of  the  soul  and  experience  of  Jesus. 


154    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

He  will,  of  course,  never  fully  succeed,  but  he  must  not 
give  up  the  attempt.  He  must  resist  the  temptation 
to  rest  content  with  superficial  phrases  and  with  formal 
descriptions  and  titles.  The  freer,  the  less  tied  to  tradi- 
tional formulae  and  methods  he  can  be  the  better  will 
he  succeed  in  his  purpose.  Youth  must  feel  that  he  is 
groping  for  realities  even  if  it  does  not  know  whether  he 
succeeds  or  fails.  His  constant  failure  indeed  will  be 
educationally  more  effective  than  a  cheap  success. 

The  Moral  and  Spiritual  Secret  of  Jesus 

One  of  his  main  difficulties  will  be  to  interpret  the 
Messiahship  of  Jesus  in  relation  to  the  national  and  personal 
ideals  of  his  age.  He  must  try  to  show  that  Messiah- 
ship  as  a  burden  upon  the  soul  of  Jesus  rather  than  an 
external  dignity  at  which  He  snatched.  He  must  show  it, 
too,  as  the  only  contemporary  form  and  category  which 
His  deeper  moral  and  religious  experience  of  Sonship  could 
take — ^that  and  no  more. 

It  is  somewhere  in  that  experience  of  Sonship  that 
the  last  secret  of  Jesus  lies.  The  other  side  of  it  is  the 
Fatherhood  of  God.  Its  complement  for  Him  was  the 
Brotherhood  of  man.  Love  to  God  and  man  was  therefore 
essential  to  its  nature.  Freedom  and  obedience  were  at 
one  in  it.  All  His  virtues  were  the  virtues  of  this  filial 
and  brotherly  love.  They  are  the  truthfulness,  the 
gentleness,  the  courage,  the  loyalty,  the  patience,  the 
self-control,  the  wisdom,  the  justice,  the  sympathy  of 
love.  They  really  do  not  exist  as  virtues  apart  from  the 
supremacy  of  love.  The  Kingship  of  God  the  Father  is 
in  this  love,  and  it  is  to  be  finally  incorporated  in  His 
Kingdom. 

Out  of  all  this  also  comes  His  imperative  sense  of 
vocation  and  of  a  divine  mission  of  Saviourhood  which 
finds  only  partial,  temporary  and  inadequate  expression 
in  the  title  and  office  of  the  Messiah. 

In  all  this  experience  are  involved  the  great  principles 
of  the  Gospel  and  teaching  of  Jesus — the  doctrine  of  the 
Fatherhood,  the  Brotherhood  of  man,  the  value  of  the 
individual,  the  supremacy  and  universality  of  Love,  the 


THE  SYNOPTIC  PRESENTATION  OF  CHRIST       155 

moral  and  religious  significance  of  the  Kingdom  in  the 
universe,  as  well  as  the  other  convictions  which  make 
Jesus  into  the  unique  bearer  of  a  whole  new  world  of 
spiritual  values. 

It  is  along  lines  such  as  these  that  the  teacher  must 
search  for  the  background,  the  meaning  and  the  power 
of  the  contrast  with  the  Pharisees  which  led  through 
conflict  to  the  consummation  of  the  Cross. 


Social  Spirit  and  Activity  of  Jesus 

The  other  element  in  the  teaching  of  Jesus  which  was 
mentioned,  namely,  His  intimate  teaching  of  the  disciples, 
answers  to  that  other  prominent  feature  of  adolescence 
which  is  represented  by  the  group  or  social  interest. 
With  childhood  the  historical  has  ceased  to  be  narrowly 
individual  and  biographical  and  becomes  more  and  more 
social.  The  great  men  of  adolescence  are  creators  of 
communities,  leaders  and  representatives  of  groups. 
Jesus  must,  therefore,  be  presented  in  that  social 
atmosphere  which  belongs  naturally  to  Him.  Every 
aspect  of  the  life  and  teaching  of  Jesus  is  full  of  it.  His 
fundamental  rehgious  experience  was  that  of  being  one 
of  a  spiritual  family  of  God  the  Father  with  many  brothers 
and  sisters.  The  primary  ethical  expression  of  that 
experience  was  Love — the  essentially  social  principle — 
finding  wider  and  wider  application  every  day  in  service 
and  self-sacrifice  for  men.  His  teaching  in  the  aspects 
already  mentioned  mirrors  all  this — in  its  love  for  the 
open-air  life  of  nature  and  humanity,  in  His  habitual  use 
of  the  synagogue,  in  His  fight  with  the  Pharisees. 

The  one  outstanding  social  activity  of  Jesus — using 
that  word  strictly  in  the  sense  of  His  activity  in  creating 
a  new  community — must  be  associated  with  His  teaching 
of  His  group  of  disciples. 

It  is  true  that  after  His  death  the  definitely  social 
inspiration  and  impetus  derived  from  Him  led  to  the 
formation  of  the  Christian  Church.  This  represents  the 
most  significant  social  institution  in  the  history  of  the 
world  ;  and  it  must  always  form  an  important  element 
in  a  full  presentation  of  Christ. 


156    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Historically,  however,  during  His  lifetime,  the  com- 
munity actually  established  by  Jesus  was  not  a  Church 
but  a  School.  His  followers  were  not  Churchmen  but 
disciples,  and  it  is  that  group-movement  and  the  teaching 
associated  with  it  which  claims  attention  and  needs 
emphasis  in  this  study  of  Jesus  for  adolescence. 


4 
LIFE  AND  THOUGHT  OF  THE  PRIMITIVE  CHURCH 

Such  a  study  as  we  have  now  suggested  of  the  character 
and  teaching  of  Jesus  seems  to  represent  the  kind  of  moral 
and  religious  appreciation  of  His  personality  which  is 
needed  some  time  before  adolescence  is  far  advanced. 

The  Synoptic  Presentation  as  a  Whole 

To  do  full  justice,  however,  to  the  Synoptic  Gospels 
and  their  presentation  of  Christ,  something  more  is  needed 
than  an  exegetical,  literary  and  historical  study  of  the 
Gospels  themselves,  more  even  than  a  description  of  the 
historical  person,  work  and  teaching  of  Jesus,  So  far, 
what  we  have  been  doing  is  to  make  use  of  the  material 
of  the  Gospels  in  order  to  describe  the  facts  about  Jesus 
and  to  express  that  moral  and  religious  appreciation  of 
Him  which  those  facts  themselves  seem  to  us  to  imply 
and  demand — not  what  they  actually  meant  to  the 
writers  of  the  Gospels. 

We  saw  that  all  the  presentations  of  Christ  in  the 
New  Testament  include  in  varying  proportions  not  only 
an  historical  element  and  a  moral  and  religious  apprecia- 
tion, but  also  a  theological  construction.  So  far,  this 
third  element  has  found  no  definite  place  in  our  instruc- 
tion. It  is,  nevertheless,  essential  to  the  Synoptic  Gospels, 
though  it  may  not  take  a  very  prominent  place  in  their 
external  structure.  It  is,  after  all,  their  theology  that 
provides  the  categories  into  which  both  the  historical 
facts  and  the  religious  appreciation  are  put.     The  theology 


THE  SYNOPTIC  PRESENTATION  OF  CHRIST       157 

has  also  influenced  the  presentation  at  least  both  of  facts 
and  of  their  rehgious  interpretation. 

We  must,  therefore,  find  room  for  some  account  which 
will  include  the  theology  in  and  behind  the  Gospels  in 
our  instruction — especially  since  it  represents  one  of  the 
three  main  types  of  life  and  thought  in  the  New  Testament. 


Its  Relation  to  the  Life  and  Experience  of 
THE  Primitive  Church 

We  have,  then,  to  seek  the  most  effective  method  of 
describing  the  Synoptic  presentation  of  Christ  as  a  whole 
in  its  meaning,  relations  and  value,  in  its  origin,  history 
and  influence. 

This  is  not  well  done  by  abstracting  anything  like  a 
theology  of  the  Gospels  from  a  concrete  description  of 
the  life  and  experience  of  the  early  disciples.  The 
Synoptic  presentation  of  Christ  was  a  living  growth  out 
of  the  experience  of  the  Early  Church,  and  was  intimately 
connected  with  all  the  rest  of  its  life.  Undoubtedly, 
therefore,  the  proper  method  of  approaching  the  task 
before  us  is  to  describe  the  life  and  experience  of  the 
Early  Church  as  a  living  social  movement  with  the  Synoptic 
presentation  as  an  essential  element  in  it,  and  indeed  as 
its  greatest  contribution  to  the  history  of  Christianity. 
The  Synoptic  Gospels,  like  the  Johannine  Literature,  are 
not  merely  the  work  of  individual  writers  expressing 
individual  points  of  view.  They  are  the  expression  of  a 
typical  faith — and  Matthew,  Mark  and  Luke  even  in  their 
peculiar  characteristics  represent  wide  circles  in  the 
Primitive  Church  and  significant  developments  of  its 
life. 

Our  Synoptic  studies,  therefore,  while  beginning  in 
childhood  with  a  description  of  the  facts  of  the  personal 
life  of  Jesus  and  continuing  in  early  adolescence  with 
the  study  of  His  moral  and  religious  significance,  must 
culminate  in  a  religio-social  study  of  the  life,  faith  and 
theology  of  the  early  Christian  community  before  adol- 
escence has  run  its  course.  For  this  purpose  the  early 
chapters  of  Acts,  as  well  as  some  elements  in  Paul's  letters, 


158    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

must    be   employed  in   addition   to   the   material   of  the 
Synoptic  Gospels. 


The  Origin  of  Christian  Theology 

This  is  not  an  easy  study,  for  it  imphes  an  attempt  to 
distinguish  between  the  contribution  of  Jesus  Himself 
in  the  Gospels  and  the  influence  of  the  Primitive  Church 
upon  the  original  facts  and  teaching.  It  would  start 
with  the  relation  of  the  disciples  to  Jesus  during  His 
lifetime  and  after  His  death.  It  would  attempt  to  inter- 
pret the  meaning  and  influence  of  the  Resurrection,  follow- 
ing upon  the  despair  of  the  Crucifixion  and  leading  up  to 
the  descent  of  the  Holy  Spirit.  It  would  try  to  account 
for  the  origin  of  the  Christian  Church  and  describe  its 
relation  to  Judaism  and  to  the  Law.  It  would  try  to 
show  how  the  disciples  were  led  to  begin  to  theologize 
about  Jesus,  and  to  describe  the  main  factors  which 
decided  the  character,  content  and  form  of  that  theology 
— the  influence  of  the  personal  life  of  Jesus,  the  problem  of 
His  death,  the  controversy  with  the  Jews,  the  influence 
of  the  Old  Testament  and  of  Jewish  conceptions.  The 
Eschatology  with  its  problems  of  the  Messiah,  Son  of 
Man,  Son  of  God,  and  of  the  Kingdom  of  God  with  the 
Parousia,  would  be  an  important  chapter.  Such  special 
problems  also  as  the  rise  of  belief  in  the  Virgin  Birth 
and  the  identification  of  Jesus  with  the  Suffering  Servant 
would  have  to  find  a  place  as  well  as  the  causes  which 
led  to  the  origin  of  the  first  Christian  literature. 

More  than  all  the  personal  religious  faith  and  ethics 
of  the  early  disciples  and  the  Church,  their  practical, 
moral  and  religious  motives  would  require  attention. 

The  teacher  would  have  to  try  to  show  the  presenta- 
tion of  Christ  which  lies  behind  the  Synoptic  Gospels 
arising  under  and  out  of  all  these  conditions  and  influences, 
and  also  show  the  different  specific  forms  it  takes  in  the 
separate  Gospels — the  historical  emphasis  of  Mark,  the 
anti-Pharisaism  of  Matthew,  and  the  social  and  almost 
communistic  tendencies  of  Luke. 


THE  SYNOPTIC  PRESENTATION  OF  CHRIST        159 


THE  SYNOPTIC  GOSPELS  AND  MODERN 
PROBLEMS 

Finally,  while  all  this  literary  and  historical  teaching 
may  be  satisfactory  so  far  as  the  New  Testament  itself 
is  concerned,  it  certainly  can  never  by  itself  do  full  justice 
to  the  moral  and  religious  needs  of  youth.  It  has  only 
revealed  to  him  what  once  has  been.  History,  however 
significant,  is  after  all  not  religion,  which  belongs  essentially 
to  the  living  present.  Youth  needs,  and  must  have,  a 
faith  capable  of  meeting  the  needs  and  problems  of  to-day 
and  to-morrow.  It  is  not  enough  to  show  him  how  the 
Christian  faith  met  the  needs  of  yesterday. 

Modern  Valuation  of  the  Synoptic  Presentation 

Our  literary  and  historical  study  must,  therefore,  be 
accompanied  at  every  step  by  a  practical  interpretation, 
a  modern  '  translation  '  and  valuation  of  every  item  of 
our  instruction.  It  is  well  to  know  the  Gospels  and  the 
Synoptic  presentation  as  one  definite  interpretation 
or  valuation  of  Christ  and  the  Gospel,  expressed  in 
terms  of  the  first  century  ;  but  it  does  not  really  amount 
to  moral  and  religious  instruction.  It  cannot  become  a 
religious  education  without  some  attempt  to  show  its 
permanent  value  for  the  task  of  constructing  a  modern 
presentation  of  Christ  and  the  Gospel. 

Such  categories  as  Messiah,  the  Son  of  God,  the  Son 
of  Man,  the  Kingdom  of  God,  the  Suffering  Servant  and 
others  are,  after  all,  Jewish  terms.  It  is  well  to  know  their 
meaning  for  their  time.  This  *  language  of  Canaan  '  must, 
however,  be  translated  into  modern  English,  and  the 
permanent  value  of  such  terms  must  be  made  clear  before 
they  can  become  effective  instruments  of  modern  religious 
instruction  and  education. 

Relation  of  Gospels  to  Living  Issues 

The  emphasis  upon  the  historical  Jesus,  the  use  of 
Old    Testament    prophecy,    the    stress    upon    signs    and 


i6o    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

wonders,  the  place  of  the  Virgin  Birth  and  the  central 
significance  of  the  Death  and  Resurrection  in  the  Synoptic 
presentation,  suggest  and  may  give  us  some  help  to  solve 
such  modern  problems  as  the  relation  between  Christianity 
and  History,  the  use  and  value  of  the  Old  Testament 
in  religion,  the  relation  between  Science  and  Christianity, 
the  meaning  and  value  of  life  after  death  and  immortality 
— ^all  of  them  urgent  and  significant  questions  of  religion 
in  modern  days. 

Such  problems  as  these  must  have  a  definite  place  in 
any  complete  modern  religious  instruction,  and  no  teach- 
ing of  the  New  Testament  which  does  not  continually 
keep  them  in  mind,  and  which  does  not  use  the  material 
of  the  New  Testament  as  a  help  in  their  solution,  can  be 
satisfactory.  Thus  only  can  the  New  Testament  fully 
justify  its  central  place  in  modern  Christian  education. 

BOOKS 

BoussET  (W.). — Jesus.     (Halle,  1904  ;   trans.  London,  1908.) 
Coaxes  (J.  R.). — The  Christ  of  Revolution.     (London,  1920.) 
Glover  (T.   R.). — The  Jesus  of  History.     (S.C.M.,   191 7.)      Vocation. 

(S.C.M.,  1913.) 
Grubb  (E.). — Notes  on  the  Life  and  Teaching  of  Jesus.    (London,  1910.) 
King  (H.  C). — The  Ethics  of  Jesus.     (New  York,  191 2.) 
Latham  (H.). — Pastor  Pastorum.     (Cambridge,  1904.) 
M'Fadyen  (J.  F.). — Jesus  and  Life.     (London,  1917.) 
MiCKLEM  (N.). — The  Galilean.     (London,  1920.) 
Neumann  (A.). — Jesus.     (London,  1920.) 
Rashdall  (H.). — Conscience  and  Christ.     (London,  1916.) 
Robertson  (J.   A.). — The  Spiritual  Pilgrimage  of  Jesus.     (London, 

1917.) 
By  an  Unknown  Disciple.     (London,  1919.)     The  Creed  of  Christ. 

(London,  1906.) 
ScHRENCK  (E.  von). — Jesus  and  His  Teaching.     (London,  1907.) 

The  various  handbooks  of  the  S.C.M.  for  Study  Circles  on  the 
Teaching  of  Jesus  will  be  found  of  great  value  for  all  teachers. 
For  a  systematic  arrangement  of  the  text  of  the  Gospels  to 
illustrate  the  teaching  of  Jesus,  see  especially  : 
Hall  (T.  C). — The  Messages  of  Jesus.     (London,  1901.) 
Kent  (¥.).— The  Shorter  Bible.     (New  York,  191 8.) 
Weinel  (H.). — Jesus.     (Berlin,  1912.) 


CHAPTER  IX 

TEACHING   THE   PARABLES 

The  Nature  of  the  Parables. — The  New  Valuation  of  the  Parables — 
The  Parables  in  the  Gospels — Their  Authenticity — Their  Charac- 
teristics— Parable  and  Allegory. 

The  Purpose  of  the  Parables. — Mistaken  Theory  of  the  EvangeUsts 
— The  Influence  of  the  Theory — Summary. 

The  Educational  Value  and  Use  of  the  Parables. — Their  Educative 
Value — Progressive  Use  of  the  Parables — For  Small  Children — 
In  the  Life  of  Jesus — In  Early  Adolescence. 

Teaching  the  Parables  in  Practice. — How  to  Teach  the  Parables — 
The  Art  of  Telling  the  Stories — The  Practical  Application  of  the 
Parables 


THE  NATURE  OF  THE  PARABLES 

The  New  Valuation  of  the  Parables 

No  one  will  deny  that  modern  Biblical  Criticism  has 
rendered  a  very  signal  service  to  religion  by  rescuing  the 
Prophets  of  the  Old  Testament  from  the  obscurity  into 
which  they  had  been  cast  and  showing  their  fundamental 
importance  in  the  history  of  Israel  and  of  Christianity. 
It  is  no  less  certain  that  Christian  life  and  thought  must 
also  acknowledge  a  somewhat  similar  debt  to  recent 
New  Testament  scholars  for  delivering  the  parables  of 
Jesus  out  of  the  hands  of  arbitrary  methods  of  interpreta- 
tion and  making  them  available  for  the  purposes  of 
Biblical  and  religious  education.  So  arbitrary  were  those 
methods  that  it  had  become  an  axiom  that  the  parables 
were  not  to  be  used  as  a  primary  source  of  Christian 
teaching,  but  only  as  very  subordinate  helps  for  the 
purpose  of  illustration. 
II 


i62    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Even  Trench  takes  it  for  granted  that  they  form  only 
"  the  outer  ornamental  fringe,  but  not  the  main  texture  "  ^ 
where  the  teaching  of  Jesus  is  concerned.  By  this  time, 
however,  we  have  reached  a  stage  when  it  is  felt  that 
not  only  are  the  parables  the  most  characteristic  part  of 
the  teaching  of  Jesus,  but  the  most  reliable  evidence  for 
the  main  features  of  that  teaching  as  soon  as  a  scientific 
method  of  interpreting  them  is  adopted.  The  recent 
studies  of  Jiilicher,  Bugge,  Weinel  and  Fiebig  combined 
have  now  placed  the  parables  in  their  own  proper  position, 
and  for  the  first  time  have  made  it  possible  to  use  them 
effectively  in  the  work  of  religious  instruction.  Instead 
of  being  looked  upon  as  riddles  and  elaborate  allegories 
meant  to  *  half-conceal  '  the  truth,  most  of  them  at  least 
are  seen  to  be  transparent  explanations  of  some  of  the 
most  important  truths  of  the  Gospel,  mirrors  in  which 
some  of  the  most  fundamental  features  of  the  inner 
personal  life  of  Jesus  can  most  plainly  be  seen.  Their 
general  meaning  and  purpose  have  now  been  made  plainer 
than  ever  before  in  the  history  of  the  Christian  Church  ; 
and  it  has  become  one  of  the  urgent  tasks  of  the  Christian 
teacher  to  make  more  systematic  use  of  the  parables  for 
Christian  instruction  in  the  light  of  this  modern  study. 
To  do  that  he  must  first  of  all  get  a  fairly  clear  idea  of  the 
results  of  this  recent  study  with  regard  to  the  purpose 
and  place  of  the  parabolic  element  in  the  teaching  of  Jesus  ; 
and  also  of  the  methods  by  which  the  parables  can  be 
taught . 

It  is  evident  that  one  of  the  deepest  impressions  made 
upon  the  minds  of  His  hearers  by  the  teaching  of  Jesus 
was  that  it  was  very  different  from  that  of  the  Scribes, 
and  that  this  impression  was  connected  with  His  use 
of  parables.  The  first  meaning  of  this  difference,  of 
course,  is  to  be  found  not  in  the  mere  form  or  method 
of  the  teaching,  but  in  the  freshness  and  independence 
of  its  content.  His  was  not  an  elaborate  exegesis  of 
texts,  nor  was  it  an'array  of  traditional  authorities,  but 
an  outpouring  of  the  contents  of  His  own  soul  in  a  limpid 
stream.  The  Hebrew  Maschal  in  all  its  variety  of  proverb, 
paradox,  metaphor,  simile,  fable,  riddle  and  allegory  was 

^  Nctes  on  the  Parables,  p.  39  (1858). 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  163 

probably  more  or  less  familiar  to  the  people  as  part  of 
both  the  Old  Testament  and  the  Rabbinic  teaching  of 
school  and  synagogue.  What  Jesus  did  was  not  to  invent 
unheard-of  methods  of  teaching,  but  to  choose  the  most 
popular  and  effective  of  the  old.  These,  however,  he 
made  new  by  filling  them  with  the  freshness  of  His  own 
personality.  It  is  quite  possible  that  He  may  even  have 
borrowed  now  and  then  something  more  than  the  general 
forms  of  His  teaching  from  the  Rabbis  ;  but  if  so,  what 
He  borrowed  certainly  became  a  new  thing  in  His  hands. 
There  are  some  Rabbinic  sayings  and  parables  that  bear 
a  very  close  resemblance  to  some  sections  of  the  Gospels. 
In  real  meaning  and  spirit,  however,  they  are  as  different 
as  the  moral  message  of  Jesus  is  from  the  legalism  of 
Judaism. 

The  Parables  in  the  Gospels 

What  we  have  now  to  do,  however,  is  not  to  trace  the 
origin  and  history  of  the  parabolic  method,  but  to  study 
the  parables  of  Jesus  as  subject-matter  for  Christian 
instruction. 

According  to  the  Synoptic  Gospels  the  teaching  of 
Jesus  was  not  only  exclusively  moral  instruction,  but  it 
was  also  almost  entirely  occasional,  popular  and  pictorial 
in  form.  He  spoke  always  not  in  abstract  but  in  concrete 
terms — in  vivid  imagery  of  all  kinds.  Many  times  we  are 
told  generally  that  Jesus  spoke  in  parables,  and  most  of 
the  examples  given  of  His  teaching  are  in  parabolic  form. 
Three  passages  are  called  '  parables  '  in  all  three  Gospels 
— Matthew,  Mark  and  Luke.  Two  more  are  so  called  in 
Matthew  and  Mark  ;  one  more  in  Mark  alone  ;  three  in 
Matthew  alone  ;  and  eleven  in  Luke  alone.  There  are 
therefore  twenty  sections  in  the  Synoptic  Gospels  which 
are  definitely  referred  to  as  parables.  There  are  also  six 
other  passages  more  or  less  directly  referred  to  under  the 
same  name.  But  it  is  quite  evident  that  no  importance 
is  to  be  attached  to  the  occurrence  of  the  name  itself,  for 
there  are  many  other  passages  in  the  Gospels  so  similar 
in  form  and  character  to  the  above-mentioned  that  it  is 
impossible  to  separate  them.     One  writer  on  the  parables 


i64    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

includes  as  many  as  seventy-nine  sections  of  the  Gospels 
under  that  name,  and  the  number  varies  in  different 
writers  from  that  figure  down  to  thirty. 


Authenticity  of  the  Parables 

It  is  now  generally  agreed  that  this  parabolic  material 
as  a  whole  is  the  most  authentic  element  in  the  Gospels. 
The  parables  generally,  that  is  to  say,  come  in  substance 
from  Jesus  Himself,  and  they  represent  the  most  character- 
istic side  both  of  the  form  and  method  of  His  teaching. 

The  only  important  qualifications  made  by  modern 
scholars  to  that  statement  are  the  two  following  : 

{a)  It  must  be  granted  that  the  Evangelists  in  record- 
ing many  of  the  parables  do  not  give  them  in  exactly 
their  original  form — the  form  which  Jesus  gave  to  them. 
Generally  the  changes  made  are  not  of  any  importance. 
In  some  cases,  however,  it  is  held  that  the  meaning  has 
become  obscure  just  because  the  Evangelists  have  not 
been  faithful  enough  in  their  record  of  the  words  of  Jesus. 
Some,  indeed,  insist  that  in  two  or  three  cases  the  whole 
meaning  of  the  parable  has  been  changed. 

{b)  This  last  opinion,  that  two  or  three  of  the  parables 
have  been  more  or  less  mutilated  by  the  Evangelists,  is 
connected  with  the  fact  that  many  modern  critics  believe 
that  the  interpretation  given  to  some  of  the  parables  in 
the  Gospels  is  not  authentic.  It  does  not  represent  the 
thought  of  Jesus.  This  is  the  case,  it  is  said,  especially 
with  regard  to  the  Parables  of  the  Sower  and  of  the  Tares. 
The  Evangelists  have  a  mistaken  idea  that  the  parables 
are  allegories  in  which  every  detail  has  a  spiritual  mean- 
ing. Jesus,  on  the  other  hand,  it  is  held,  only  intended  to 
teach  one  supreme  truth  through  each  parable  as  a  whole. 
Other  modern  critics,  while  granting  that  the  writers  of 
the  Gospels  may  have  exaggerated  the  allegorical  element 
in  the  parables,  yet  believe  that  Jesus  Himself  did  now  and 
then  use  the  form  of  Allegory.  They  therefore  say  that 
the  allegorical  character  of  such  parables  as  those  of  the 
Sower,  the  Tares  and  the  Wicked  Husbandmen  is  not 
due  to  the  Evangelists,  but  to  Jesus  Himself.  This  point 
is  of  importance,  as  we  shall  see  later  on,  in  so  far  as  it 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  165 

affects  the  general  purpose  of  the  parables.  Omitting, 
however,  for  the  moment  all  consideration  of  the  three 
parables  just  mentioned,  let  us  see  what  is  the  particular 
nature  of  the  others  that  we  find  in  the  Gospels. 

It  would  seem  that  the  only  elements  essential  to  a 
parable  in  the  sense  of  the  Gospels  are,  in  the  first  place, 
a  thought  or  truth  that  needs  expression  or  explanation, 
and  then  the  illustration  or  expression  of  that  truth  by 
means  of  a  comparison.  The  comparison,  however,  may 
and  does  take  several  forms,  and  we  find  the  word  used 
by  the  Evangelists  to  cover  a  variety  of  comparisons, 
extending  from  a  proverb  like  "  Physician,  heal  thyself," 
to  an  allegory  like  that  of  the  Wicked  Husbandmen  in 
Mark  xii. 

Nature  of  the  Parables 

(a)  The  simplest  form  is  that  which  may  be  called  the 
Similitude,  in  which  a  resemblance  is  pointed  out  between 
some  general  fact  in  nature  or  in  ordinary  life  and  a 
moral  or  religious  truth.  A  good  example  of  this  kind  of 
parable  is  the  saying  about  God  and  Mammon.  "  No 
man  can  serve  two  masters  :  for  either  he  will  hate  the 
one,  and  love  the  other  ;  or  he  will  hold  to  the  one,  and 
despise  the  other.  Ye  cannot  serve  God  and  Mammon." 
There  are  at  least  twenty-eight  parables  in  this  form  of 
similitudes  in  the  Gospels. 

(b)  The  comparison  may,  in  the  second  place,  take 
the  form  of  a  complete  incident,  real  or  imaginary,  taken 
from  ordinary  fife.  Here  something  that  is  done  by  a 
certain  person  in  definite  circumstances  is  used  to  illus- 
trate or  enforce  a  moral  truth.  The  best  known  example 
of  this  kind  of  parable  is  the  narrative  of  the  Prodigal 
Son,  in  which  the  attitude  of  God  to  man  is  illustrated  and 
enforced  by  a  comparison  with  the  attitude  of  a  loving 
father  to  his  son  under  certain  definite  circumstances. 
In  form  and  character  these  narratives  are  of  exactly  the 
same  kind  as  those  we  know  as  jEsop's  Fables,  but  the 
word  '  fable  '  has  become  so  identified  with  stories  of 
animals  speaking  that  we  cannot  use  it  of  these  narratives 
of  Jesus.  Professor  JiiUcher  therefore  suggests  that  the 
word  '  parable  *  should  be   used  of  them  in  a  restricted 


i66    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

sense,  and  considers  that  there  are  twenty-one  parables 
of  this  kind  in  the  Gospels. 

(c)  There  is  still  another  type  of  parable  in  the  Gospels 
which  has  been  called  that  of  the  Illustrative  Instance.  In 
these  the  moral  truth  is  enforced  and  illustrated  by  giving 
a  typical  narrative  of  its  application  in  practical  life. 
At  least  four  of  the  parables  of  Jesus  are  of  this  kind, 
namely,  those  of  the  Good  Samaritan,  the  Pharisee  and  the 
Publican,  the  Rich  Fool  and  the  Rich  Man  and  Lazarus. 

{d)  Finally,  as  has  already  been  mentioned,  there  are 
three  other  parables  so  called,  which  cannot  be  classed 
either  as  Similitudes  or  Parables  in  the  narrow  sense 
(that  is.  Fables)  or  Illustrative  Instances.  These  are  the 
Parables  of  the  Sower,  of  the  Tares  and  of  the  Wicked 
Husbandmen.  They  differ  from  the  others  not  only  in 
the  fact  that  every  detail  of  them  has  a  meaning  and  place 
in  the  message  of  each  parable,  but  that  they  have  also 
become  the  subject  of  much  controversy  as  to  how  far 
they  are  to  be  attributed  to  Jesus  in  their  present  form. 
The  subject  raises  the  whole  question  of  the  interpreta- 
tion of  the  parables  in  general.  Their  value  for  Christian 
instruction  depends  very  largely  upon  that. 


2 

THE  PURPOSE  OF  THE  PARABLES 

Why  did  Jesus  speak  in  parables  ?  How  did  He  wish 
them  to  be  interpreted  ?  So  far,  it  has  been  implied  that 
His  purpose  was  simply  to  explain  and  enforce  His  teach- 
ing through  them  in  a  popular  way,  and  that  He  expected 
their  meaning  and  point  to  be  immediately  understood. 
At  first  sight  that  seems  self-evident. 

Purpose  of  the  Parables 

It  is  only  natural  to  suppose  that  Jesus  in  putting  His 
teaching  into  these  concrete  images  is  simply  following 
the  methods  of  all  popular  teachers,  and  is  trying  to  make 
the  truth  He  has  to  proclaim  more  easy  to  understand 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  167 

than  it  would  be  in  abstract  forms.  On  general  grounds, 
the  purpose  of  the  parables  would  need  no  discussion. 
Everybody  would  take  it  for  granted  that  Jesus  by  this 
means  wished  to  come  into  closer  touch  with  His  hearers. 
Unfortunately,  however,  the  matter  cannot  be  disposed  of 
so  easily.  The  Gospels  themselves  create  the  difficulty  by 
saying  that  there  is  a  totally  different  motive  at  the  back 
of  the  parables  of  Jesus.  In  one  passage  at  least  they 
describe  the  Master  Himself  as  explaining  the  general 
purpose  of  His  use  of  parables,  and  the  explanation  is  a 
very  strange  one.  He  is  represented  as  saying  that  His 
object  is  not  to  reveal  the  truth  but  to  hide  it.  In 
different  forms  this  passage  is  found  in  all  three  Gospels, 
but  it  is  borrowed  by  Matthew  and  Luke  from  Mark. 
In  the  latter  it  runs  as  follows,  according  to  Dr.  Moffatt's 
translation  : 

"  And  when  He  was  alone,  His  associates  and  the 
Twelve  questioned  Him  about  the  parables.  Then  said 
He  to  them,  *  To  you  is  the  secret  of  God's  reign  given, 
but  to  those  outside  everything  is  imparted  by  way  of 
parables  ;  that  they  may  see  and  see,  yet  not  perceive, 
and  hear  and  hear,  yet  not  understand,  lest  haply  they 
should  turn  again  and  be  forgiven.'  " 

There  does  not  seem  to  be  much  possibility  of  mistaking 
the  meaning  of  these  words.  They  declare  quite  plainly 
two  things  : 

1.  First  of  all,  they  say  that  Jesus  has  two  kinds  of 
teaching,  one  of  which  is  called  *  the  secret  of  God's 
reign  '  and  the  other  '  parables.'  The  former  is  given  to 
the  circle  of  disciples,  the  latter  to  the  crowd  outside. 

2.  Secondly,  they  declare  that  the  purpose  of  the 
parables  is  to  give  the  crowds  something  for  eyes  and 
ears  but  nothing  that  can  enter  mind  and  will.  This  is 
a  means  of  hiding  the  truth  from  them — to  prevent  their 
repenting. 

We  may  try  to  soften  the  harshness  of  this  inter- 
pretation, as  the  other  Evangelists  have  tried  to  do,  but 
we  cannot  get  rid  of  it.  Mark  is  here  attributing  to  Jesus 
a  view  of  the  parables  that  makes  them  the  means  of 
concealing  the  truth. 

The  question  is.  Can  this  theory  be  adopted  in  view 


i68    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

of  everything  else  that  we  know  about  Jesus  and  the 
parables  ?  It  is  universally  agreed  that  we  cannot,  and 
that  for  several  reasons. 


Mistaken  Theory  of  the  Evangelists 

In  the  first  place,  even  the  Evangelists  themselves 
do  not  adhere  to  it.  It  has  had  some  effect,  it  is  true, 
upon  the  form  they  give  to  some  of  the  parables,  but  now 
and  then  they  represent  Jesus  as  using  expressions  which 
contradict  the  theory.  For  instance,  in  introducing  one 
parable,  He  says  :  "  Hear  Me  all  of  you  and  understand," 
taking  it  for  granted  that  He  can  make  the  truth  plain 
to  them  by  means  of  a  parable  (Mark  vii.  14).  He  is  also 
surprised  when  they  do  not  understand. 

In  the  second  place,  many  of  the  parables  themselves 
contradict  the  theory.  So  far  from  hiding  the  truth 
from  the  people  are  they,  that  no  better  instances  can  be 
given  of  a  truth  made  absolutely  plain.  Who  could  miss 
the  message  of  the  Good  Samaritan,  the  Prodigal  Son  and 
the  Hidden  Treasure  ? 

In  the  third  place,  such  a  theory  is  contradicted  by 
the  whole  character  of  Jesus  as  described  by  the  Evangel- 
ists. He  saw  in  *  teaching,'  '  preaching,'  *  seeking  the 
lost,*  the  mission  of  His  life,  and  He  was  not  the  one  to 
mock  the  helplessness  of  the  crowd.  It  is  impossible 
to  think  of  Him  as  speaking  in  parables  with  the  object 
of  not  being  understood. 

We  are  forced  to  say  either  that  the  Evangelists  have 
seriously  misreported  the  words  of  Jesus  on  this  matter, 
or  that  they  are  putting  their  own  later  and  mistaken 
interpretation  of  the  parables  into  the  mouth  of  Jesus, 
and  that  He  Himself  never  had  occasion  to  discuss  His 
purpose  in  using  them.  In  any  case,  we  can  do  nothing 
with  this  mistaken  theory  of  the  Evangelists,  for  it  does 
serious  injustice  both  to  the  parables  themselves  and  to 
the  character  of  Jesus.  He  certainly  did  not  spend  His 
time  so  largely  in  propounding  riddles  and  weaving 
elaborate  allegories.  Such  an  idea  could  only  arise  after 
His  death.  The  disciples  had  then  to  explain  the  fact 
that  the   Jews   refused   to    accept    Him  as  the  Messiah, 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  169 

and  they  fell  back,  in  this  as  in  other  cases,  upon  the 
theory  that  they  were  '  predestined  '  not  to  understand. 
They  gave  the  same  explanation  of  His  betrayal  by 
Judas. 

Once  this  mistaken  interpretation  has  been  cleared 
out  of  the  way,  however,  we  are  left  only  with  the  natural 
explanation  that  Jesus  used  parables  because  He  found 
that  he  could  make  His  teaching  plainer  and  more  con- 
vincing through  them.  We  gain  nothing  by  trying,  as 
many  do,  to  combine  some  form  of  the  theory  of  the 
Evangelists  with  this.  To  say  that  Jesus  intended  to 
half-conceal  and  half-reveal  the  truth  in  parables,  is  to 
say  that  He  was  at  cross-purposes  with  Himself,  without 
either  saving  the  accuracy  of  the  Evangelists  or  doing 
justice  to  the  sublime  simplicity  of  the  majority  of  the 
parables. 

Influence  of  the  Theory 

But  then,  if  it  was  the  purpose  of  the  parables  to 
explain  and  enforce  the  thought  of  Jesus,  why  is  it  that 
some  of  them  are  so  difficult  of  interpretation  ?  The 
meaning  of  most  of  them  is  perfectly  clear,  and  their 
point  cannot  well  be  missed.  When  that  is  not  the  case, 
there  is  always  a  definite  reason  for  the  apparent  obscurity. 
It  is  a  defect  in  their  transmission.  Some  are  given  by 
the  Evangelists  only  in  a  fragmentary  form,  and  probably 
almost  always  in  a  more  or  less  shortened  form.  The 
situation  and  context  in  which  they  were  spoken  were 
forgotten. 

Sometimes,  too,  the  theory  of  the  Evangelists  has 
affected  the  original  form  of  the  parable.  It  must  be 
remembered  also  that  the  life  to  which  Jesus  appeals  is 
not  so  familiar  to  us  as  it  was  to  the  people  who  listened 
to  Jesus. 

All  our  difficulties  in  interpreting  the  parables  arise 
from  these  causes — difficulties  that  had  no  existence  at 
the  time  they  were  spoken.  As  they  came  from  the  lips 
of  the  great  Teacher,  they  formed  the  clearest  and  most 
convincing  part  of  His  teaching. 

It  is  the  business  of  the  modern  Christian  teacher  to 
revive  in  the  minds  of  his  pupils  something  of  their  fresh- 


170    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

ness  and  of  the  impression  they  made  upon  those  who 
first  heard  them. 

Summary 

In  the  preceding  discussion,  emphasis  has  been  laid 
upon  the  following  points  with  regard  to  the  parables  in 
the  Synoptic  Gospels  : 

1 .  That  the  parabolic  teaching  was  the  most  character- 
istic element  in  the  teaching  of  Jesus,  and  that  it  made 
a  deep  impression  of  freshness  and  originality  upon  His 
hearers.     "  The  common  people  heard  Him  gladly." 

2.  That  these  parables  are  essentially  concrete  illustra- 
tions from  ordinary  life,  used  by  Jesus  in  order  to  make 
His  message  more  effective  than  it  would  otherwise  be. 
They  are  not  elaborate  allegories  in  which  every  detail 
has  a  hidden  meaning,  but  familiar  similes  and  narratives 
which  culminate  in  one  special  point.  That  point  Jesus 
wishes  to  emphasize  in  order  to  express  and  confirm  a 
moral  truth  or  a  moral  duty. 

3.  That  in  the  Gospels  we  generally  get  these  parables 
themselves  in  substance  very  much  in  the  form  given  to 
them  by  Jesus.  Sometimes,  however,  we  have  only  a 
summary.  The  circumstances  in  which  they  were  spoken 
have  not  always  been  preserved  for  us  in  the  Gospels. 
Sometimes  also,  owing  to  a  mistaken  theory  held  by  the 
Evangelists  with  regard  to  the  nature  of  the  parables  as 
intended  to  hide  the  truth  from  the  people,  an  incorrect 
interpretation  has  been  given  in  the  Gospels.  Even  while 
they  give  us  the  parables  themselves  in  their  original  form, 
they  sometimes  add  their  own  comments,  and  these  are 
not  always  consistent  with  the  purpose  of  Jesus. 

This  last  feature  is  really  the  main  difficulty  with  which 
the  teacher  has  to  contend  when  he  is  using  the  parables 
in  religious  instruction.  If  the  reports  of  the  Gospels 
were  not  often  fragmentary,  and  if  they  did  not  so  often 
omit  to  state  the  exact  circumstances  in  which  each 
parable  was  spoken,  the  teacher  would  find  his  task  a 
much  easier  one.  His  work  is  complicated  by  the  need  of 
supplying  for  the  child  what  is  missing  in  the  Gospels. 

These  being  the  facts  with  regard  to  the  parables 
and  their  transmission,  it  is  clear  that  the  general  task  of 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  171 

the  teacher  in  connection  with  them  is  to  use  them  each 
and  all  in  such  a  way  as  to  reproduce  something  of  the 
clear  impression  which  they  made  upon  the  minds  of  the 
people  who  first  listened  to  them.  This  cannot  be  done 
simply  by  reading  a  parable  from  the  Gospels  and  making 
moral  and  religious  comments  upon  each  detail.  That 
is  the  only  method  still  commonly  adopted,  and  it  destroys 
the  freshness  of  the  parabolic  teaching. 

In  order  to  prepare  the  way  for  making  the  most 
effective  use  of  the  parables  in  Christian  instruction,  it 
may,  therefore,  be  useful  to  enter  upon  a  somewhat 
detailed  and  educational  discussion. 


3 
THE  EDUCATIONAL  VALUE  OF  THE  PARABLES 

That  the  fundamental  significance  of  the  parables  of 
Jesus  is  educational  may  easily  be  realized.  They  provide 
us,  indeed,  with  the  most  direct  educative  material  in  the 
New  Testament.  They  were  created  by  the  greatest  of 
all  Teachers  expressly  for  the  purpose  of  moral  and 
religious  education  and  instruction.  That  is  largely  why 
the  great  educators  have  returned  again  and  again  to  the 
teaching  methods  of  Jesus  for  inspiration  and  guidance. 
Here,  if  anywhere,  the  Christian  teacher  can  learn  how 
and  what  to  teach.  It  might  almost  be  said  that  the  use 
we  make  of  the  parables  in  education  is  the  best  test  of 
whether  and  how  far  the  spirit  of  Jesus  and  the  Christian 
Gospel  has  obtained  a  firm  grip  of  our  instruction. 

Educative  Value  of  the  Parables 

Moreover,  their  use  by  Jesus  Himself  will  enable  us 
to  see  just  at  what  point  in  religious  growth  the  parables 
are  most  likely  to  exercise  their  full  weight  of  influence  in 
education.  Evidently  they  seemed  to  Jesus  to  provide 
the  most  likely  means  of  effecting  the  transition  from  an 
external  and  objective  stage  of  development  to  a  more 
internal     and     subjective     period — represented    in    His 


172    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

historical  circumstances  by  the  transition  from  the 
moraHty  of  outward  observance  and  Law  to  that  of  dis- 
position, love  and  freedom.  In  a  word,  and  using  the  terms 
of  individual  and  educational  psychology,  we  are  at  the 
end  of  childhood  and  the  beginning  of  adolescence.  And 
there  is  no  doubt  that  every  educational  consideration 
points  to  the  fact  that  it  is  here  that  the  most  fruitful 
teaching  of  the  parables  of  Jesus — both  as  regards  sub- 
stance and  method — is  in  its  proper  place.  It  does  not 
follow  that  their  material  cannot  be  used  at  any  other 
time,  but  it  will  only  be  for  some  subsidiary  purpose 
and  in  some  subsidiary  way.  Earlier  than  towards  the 
end  of  childhood,  we  can  only  prepare  the  way  for  a  full 
teaching  of  them,  and  that  in  a  fragmentary  manner. 
Later  than  early  adolescence,  we  can  only  elaborate  and 
systematize  their  teaching.  Their  full  educative  oppor- 
tunity comes  once  and  for  all  in  late  childhood  or  in 
early  adolescence.  It  is  then  that  their  inherent  power 
to  influence  the  process  of  moral  growth  will  tell  decisively. 

Progressive  Use  of  the  Parables 

Guided  also  by  the  literary,  historical,  ethical  and 
religious  significance  of  the  parables  as  they  are  found  in 
the  Gospels,  it  will  not  be  a  difficult  task  for  the  teacher 
to  decide  when,  in  what  form  and  for  what  purpose  each 
parable  should  be  used  in  instruction. 

For  Small  Children 

In  the  first  place,  some  of  the  parables  of  Jesus  are 
such  consummate  examples  of  the  art  of  story-telling, 
illustrative  of  elementary  moral  virtues,  that  their  use 
cannot  well  be  avoided  in  the  instruction  of  children  even 
before  they  pass  out  of  their  infancy.  At  this  time,  of 
course,  they  would  be  used  not  as  part  of  the  deepest 
religious  teaching  of  Jesus  nor  even  definitely  as  parables 
in  their  original  context.  They  would  be  used  simply  as 
independent  narratives,  valuable  in  and  for  themselves, 
forming  part  of  a  collection  of  interesting  individual 
stories  suitable  for  the  instruction  of  children  under  eight 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  173 

years  of  age.  There  are  some  of  them  that  require 
practically  no  change  at  all  in  order  to  adapt  them  for 
this  purpose.  Their  Biblical  form  is  so  complete  in  detail, 
so  transparent,  as  to  be  easily  intelligible  as  stories  even 
to  the  smallest  child.  Such,  for  instance,  are  the  stories 
of  the  Good  Samaritan  and  of  the  Loving  Father  (which 
would  be  a  better  title  for  this  purpose  than  the  Prodigal 
Son).  The  former  would  be  told  simply  as  an  instance  of 
unselfish  kindness  by  a  stranger,  and  the  latter  as  one  of 
a  father's  generous  love. 

There  are  others  that  would  require  more  elaboration 
of  their  detail  in  order  to  make  them  effective  for  small 
children.  The  teacher,  however,  need  not  hesitate  about 
filling  out  their  detail  so  long  as  he  is  faithful  to  their 
essential  meaning,  for  it  is  very  probable  that  Jesus 
Himself  gave  them  originally  in  a  much  fuller  form  than 
the  one  we  now  find  in  the  Gospels.  In  this  way  the 
story  of  the  Shepherd  and  the  Lost  Sheep  might  be  used 
as  an  illustration  of  care  for  animals  and  kindness  to  them. 
To  this  a  companion  story  might  be  made  out  of  the 
Parable  of  the  Good  Shepherd.  This,  of  course,  is  not 
the  main  purpose  of  these  parables,  but  it  is  quite  in  their 
spirit  and  in  the  spirit  of  Jesus,  while  it  only  requires 
an  easy  elaboration  of  their  details  to  make  them  very 
effective  for  this  end. 


In  the  Life  of  Jesus 

There  is  also  another  aspect  of  the  parables  which 
has  not  yet  had  the  attention  it  deserves  even  in  the 
scientific  study  of  Jesus  and  the  Gospels.  They  are  not 
only  the  supreme  examples  of  the  art  of  teaching  as 
practised  by  Him,  but  many  of  them  have  also  a  unique 
psychological  value.  They  not  only  explain  the  truths 
He  preached  and  enforce  the  demands  He  made,  but  they 
often  also  cast  a  welcome  light  backwards  upon  the  history 
of  His  inner  life  and  His  personal  experiences  and  interests. 
After  all,  every  man  spontaneously  turns  to  that  part 
of  life  and  the  world  in  which  he  is  most  interested  and 
of  which  he  has  the  fullest  knowledge,  for  his  aptest 
illustrations.     It    is,   therefore,    not    without    significance 


174    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

that  almost  half  the  figures,  illustrations  and  metaphors 
used  by  Jesus  are  taken  direct  from  the  common  open- 
air  life  of  nature  around  Him,  and  almost  the  other  half 
from  the  details  of  the  ordinary  daily  occupations  of  the 
men  among  whom  He  lived.  There  is  scarcely  an  ordinary 
calling  known  to  His  time  and  country  which  He  does 
not  use  in  a  spontaneous  way  in  order  to  explain  and 
enforce  His  Gospel.  That  at  once  stamps  Him  and 
reveals  Him  as  a  lover  of  Nature  and  of  ordinary  men — 
a  soul  rejoicing  in  the  open  air  of  the  world's  life,  and  a 
sympathetic  sharer  in  men's  ordinary  experiences,  with  a 
human  interest  in  their  daily  work  and  their  children's 
play. 

More  than  that,  even,  there  is  every  reason  to  think 
that  some  of  the  parables  have  sprung  directly  out  of 
particular  moral  experiences  in  the  personal  life  of  Jesus 
Himself,  and  in  that  sense  are  '  human  documents  *  of 
supreme  value. 

In  Late  Childhood 

It  seems  to  follow  that  some  of  the  parables  must 
naturally  find  a  place  when  sometime  between  the  ages  of 
nine  and  twelve  we  should  try  (as  we  have  already  seen) 
to  give  a  picture  of  the  personal  life  and  activity  of  Jesus. 
In  order  to  make  His  life  real,  we  must  include  some 
pictures  of  Him  as  a  teacher,  and  we  cannot  do  better 
than  give  some  concrete  instances  of  how  He  taught  the 
people  in  parables.  Here  and  there  in  the  sketch  of  His 
life — ^when  He  is  described  as  teaching  in  the  Synagogue, 
or  walking  with  His  disciples  or  conversing  with  in- 
dividuals or  preaching  to  the  crowd — one  or  more  of  the 
parables  might  well  be  introduced  into  His  conversation 
or  address.  The  main  object  of  this,  of  course,  would  be 
to  give  a  real  picture  of  Jesus  Himself,  and  the  parables 
chosen  would  therefore  be  those  that  cast  some  light 
backwards  upon  His  own  life  or  that  can  be  most  easily 
inserted  into  definite  situations  in  the  general  narrative. 

The  Parable  of  the  Treasure  would  fit  admirably  into 
the  early  days  of  the  ministry,  and  find  a  background  as 
well  as  an  application  in  the  life  of  Jesus  and  His  disciples. 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  175 

sacrificing  home  and  friends  for  the  sake  of  the  Kingdom. 
The  Parable  of  the  Sower  finds  a  natural  background 
when  Jesus  sends  out  His  disciples  on  their  mission 
through  Galilee,  making  them  realize  what  He  Himself  had 
already  realized  in  His  own  experience,  namely,  the  variety 
of  the  results  to  be  expected. 

In  the  same  way  some  of  the  other  parables  may  be 
inserted  at  different  points  into  the  narrative  of  the  life  in 
such  a  way  as  to  illustrate  very  vividly  the  experience 
through  which  Jesus  and  His  disciples  must  have  been 
passing  at  that  very  time.  The  teacher  will  find  it  an 
interesting  work  to  seek  for  a  suitable  background  in  the 
life  of  Jesus  for  such  parables  as  are  simply  grouped 
together  without  a  context  in  the  thirteenth  chapter  of 
Matthew. 

In  Early  Adolescence 

So  far,  however,  we  have  only  been  introducing  the 
parables  into  the  curriculum  in  a  more  or  less  subsidiary 
way.  As  we  have  seen,  the  great  opportunity  for  any 
adequate  teaching  of  the  parables  of  Jesus  in  their  full 
significance  as  expressing  His  fundamental  principles 
and  enforcing  His  most  urgent  moral  demands,  comes 
at  the  end  of  the  period  of  late  childhood  or  in  early 
adolescence.  At  this  time  the  children  are  developing 
very  rapidly  their  powers  of  independent  thought,  and 
some  elementary  lessons  on  the  parables  will  help  to 
link  the  concrete  narratives  of  childhood  with  the  more 
definitely  intellectual  instruction  that  must  begin  with 
adolescence. 

Two  methods  of  dealing  with  the  parabolic  teaching 
are  here  in  place.  At  about  twelve  or  thirteen  years  of 
age  a  special  series  of  lessons  on  the  main  parables,  chosen 
for  their  particular  ethical  or  religious  significance,  might 
be  given.  A  good  introduction  for  such  a  series  would  be 
a  few  lessons  on  the  life  of  Jesus  in  the  open  air,  His 
accurate  observation  and  love  of  nature  as  well  as  His 
interest  in  the  ordinary  life  and  work  of  men.  Then  the 
general  purpose  of  parables  would  be  explained,  and  finally 
a  selection  of  the  simplest  parables  dealt  with  one  by 
one.     This  selection  would  certainly  include  those  of  the 


176    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Good  Samaritan,  the  Prodigal  Son,  the  Lost  Sheep,  the 
Pharisee  and  the  PubHcan,  the  Servants  entrusted  with 
Money,  the  House  built  on  the  Rock,  the  Mustard  Seed, 
the  Treasure  and  the  Pearl. 

Finally,  somewhat  later  in  adolescence,  an  attempt 
must  be  made  to  deal,  as  we  have  seen,  with  the  whole 
subject  of  the  teaching  of  Jesus  more  systematically. 
Undoubtedly,  the  best  introduction  to  such  a  sketch  and 
the  best  summary  of  the  teaching  of  Jesus  will  be  found 
in  a  consideration  of  the  parables. 

Naturally  it  is  not  contended  that  all  these  sug- 
gestions for  making  use  of  the  parables  should  be  rigidly 
included  in  every  curriculum.  The  discussion  is  only 
intended  to  reveal  the  many  opportunities  there  are  in 
modern  education  to  make  much  fuller  use  of  this  material, 
and  in  a  more  effective  way  than  has  so  far  been  made. 
The  method  of  dealing  with  the  parables  wherever  and 
whenever  introduced  needs  careful  consideration,  and  some 
discussion  of  that  subject  here  will  not  be  out  of  place. 


4 

TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  IN  PRACTICE 

How  TO  Teach  the  Parables 

It  has  already  been  said  that  the  general  task  of  the 
Christian  teacher  with  regard  to  the  parables  is  to  use 
each  one  of  them  in  such  a  way  as  to  reproduce  something 
of  the  fresh  impression  which  it  made  upon  the  minds 
of  the  people  who  first  listened  to  it.  How,  then,  is  the 
teacher  to  approach  his  task  with  that  end  in  view  ? 
In  the  first  place,  he  must  study  the  record  of  each  parable 
so  that  the  one  special  point  emphasized  in  the  story 
may  become  perfectly  clear  to  him.  In  most  cases  a 
careful  reading  of  the  story  is  enough  to  show  what  that 
is.  In  the  story  of  the  Hidden  Treasure,  for  instance,  the 
point  evidently  is  the  decision  to  give  up  every  possession 
which  the  man  has  in  order  to  gain  the  more  valuable 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  177 

treasure.  In  the  story  of  the  Prodigal  Son  it  is  the 
father's  overflowing  love,  bent  upon  forgiveness  in  spite 
of  all  obstacles.  The  main  point  of  the  story  of  the 
Servants  entrusted  with  Money  by  their  master  is  that 
every  possession  implies  a  duty — ^the  extent  of  the  duty 
depending  on  the  extent  of  the  privilege.  Of  course,  if  the 
point  itself  of  each  story  is  not  perfectly  clear,  it  is  useless 
trying  to  explain  or  enforce  a  moral  truth  or  a  moral 
duty  through  it. 


The  Art  of  Story-telling 

The  next  step  for  the  teacher  will  be  to  tell  the  story 
in  such  a  way  as  to  bring  out  the  point  in  the  telling 
itself.  If  he  wishes  to  do  any  kind  of  justice  to  the 
method  of  Jesus  he  must  cultivate  the  art  of  story-telling. 
He  must  try  to  make  the  story  appeal  as  a  whole  directly 
to  the  imagination  and  reason  of  the  class  without  any 
explanation.  He  must  remember  that  he  is  dealing 
primarily  with  children  who  require  a  fuller  and  more 
picturesque  narrative  than  is  generally  given  in  the  Gospels. 
So  in  many  cases  he  must  be  bold  enough  to  use  his 
imagination  in  filling  out  the  details  and  making  a  com- 
plete story  out  of  the  outline  in  the  Gospels — always 
taking  care,  of  course,  not  to  obscure  the  main  point. 
The  test  of  the  good  teacher  is  his  power  of  expanding 
the  brief  form  which  he  finds  in  the  Gospels  in  such  a 
way  as  to  make  the  child  realize  the  force  of  the  main 
point  without  the  need  of  explaining  it  to  him  in  so  many 
words. 

The  details  of  the  story  are  not  of  any  independent 
value.  Their  purpose  is  to  make  the  whole  story  natural 
and  interesting,  serving  always  to  make  its  point  more 
convincing.  The  story  of  the  Hidden  Treasure,  for 
instance,  will  not  appeal  to  the  child  in  the  brief  form  given 
to  it  by  the  Evangelist.  The  labourer  and  his  master 
to  whom  the  field  belongs  must  enter  as  actors  on  the 
scene  ;  the  operations  of  '  selling  all  that  he  hath  *  and 
of  buying  the  field  must  be  dramatically  described  ;  while 
some  definite  idea  of  the  value  of  the  treasure  and  the 
12 


178    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

sacrifice  involved  in  selling  the  goods  must  be  given  by 
describing  the  digging  up  of  the  treasure  and  enumerating 
some  of  the  precious  things  the  man  must  sell. 

Filling  up  the  outline  by  particular  descriptions  of 
this  kind  is  the  only  way  to  produce  the  needed  impres- 
sion upon  the  child.  Merely  saying  '  he  sold  all  that  he 
had  '  will  not  make  him  realize  what  is  happening,  but 
a  short,  vivid  description  of  the  sale  of  the  furniture 
and  the  break-up  of  his  home  would  make  the  situation 
real  and  the  point  effective. 

Once  the  teacher  has  constructed  a  narrative  of  this 
kind  and  is  able  to  tell  it  vividly  he  has  laid  the  foundation 
for  the  moral  truth  or  duty  which  he  wishes  to  emphasize. 
As  this  man  was  ready  and  determined  to  give  up  the 
good  things  that  he  had  for  the  sake  of  the  better — so 
Jesus  encourages  the  readiness  of  men  to  give  up  even 
what  is  good  in  the  moral  life  for  what  is  better,  and  the 
better  for  what  is  best,  though  it  is  not  always  easy  to 
do  so. 

Applying  the  Parables 

What  is  then  left  for  the  teacher  to  do  is  to  apply  this 
truth  or  duty  to  concrete  circumstances.  This  he  can 
do  in  two  ways.  He  can  do  so,  in  the  first  place,  by 
finding  such  a  situation  in  the  life  of  Jesus  as  will 
show  the  parable  in  action.  It  will  be  noticed  in  Matt, 
xiii.  44-46  that  the  Parable  of  the  Hidden  Treasure  is 
simply  grouped  with  others.  We  are  not  told  when, 
where  and  for  what  definite  purpose  it  was  spoken. 
We  can,  however,  easily  imagine  a  situation  in  which  it 
might  have  been  used  with  effect  and  concretely  applied. 
No  doubt  Jesus  was  many  times  brought  into  close 
touch  with  some  Galilean  peasant  who  was  deeply  im- 
pressed and  troubled  by  His  teaching.  The  vision  of  a 
better  life  had  been  given  to  him,  but  he  could  not  finally 
bring  himself  to  make  the  sacrifice  that  was  necessary 
in  order  to  realize  the  new  life  as  his  own.  There  were 
serious  difficulties  in  the  way — perhaps  ties  of  love  or 
comradeship  or  home  or  possessions  were  keeping  him 
bound   to  what   he  was.    What   better  way  of  making 


TEACHING  THE  PARABLES  179 

the  message  of  this  parable  real  than  by  showing  it  as 
part  of  the  conversations  of  Jesus  with  such  a  man  ? 

The  second  method  of  making  the  application  of  the 
parable  real  would  be  to  give  concrete  instances  of  men 
and  women  in  history  who  have  given  up  the  good  things 
they  loved  for  the  sake  of  the  better  they  had  seen. 
Examples  might  be  found  even  within  the  experience  of 
the  child  himself  when  some  valuable  good  thing  must 
be  sacrificed  in  order  to  attain  something  better. 

In  brief,  therefore,  an  effective  method  of  giving  a 
lesson  on  this  Parable  of  the  Hidden  Treasure  would  be 
as  follows  : 

1.  A  brief  description  of  Jesus  giving  up  home  and 
friends  for  the  sake  of  His  work,  and  of  His  disciples 
doing  the  same  thing,  would  form  an  introduction. 

2.  Then  a  scene  in  which  Jesus  is  teaching  in  one  of 
the  villages  of  Galilee  would  be  described  ;  the  effect 
upon  some  one  definite  person  which  Jesus  notices  ;  his 
vision  of  a  better  life  ;  his  perplexity  and  the  difficulties 
in  the  way  ;  his  coming  to  Jesus  with  his  doubts  and 
difficulties. 

3.  During  the  conversation  Jesus  tells  him  this  story 
of  the  Hidden  Treasure  for  the  definite  purpose  of  en- 
couraging him  to  come  to  a  decision  to  sacrifice  the  good 
things  which  he  values  for  the  sake  of  the  better  that 
Jesus  has  to  offer. 

4  4.  Finally,  one  or  two  examples  from  history  might 
be  given  of  people  who  have  faced  and  made  the  same 
choice,  and  the  child  could  be  shown  that  the  same  ex- 
perience can  come  into  his  own  life. 

Such  a  scheme  seems  to  provide  an  effective  method 
of  teaching  most  of  the  parables,  whether  they  are  given 
as  part  of  the  life  of  Jesus  or  in  a  series  of  independent 
lessons.  It  is  only  after  they  have  been  taught  in  this 
way  that  they  can  be  read  with  profit  and  commented 
on  in  the  Gospels  themselves. 

BOOKS 

Browne  (L.  E.). — The  Parables  of  the  Gospels  in  the  Light  of  Modern 

Criticism.     (Cambridge,  191 3.) 
Bruce  (A.  B.). — The  Parabolic  Teaching  of  Christ.     (London,  1887.) 


i8o    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

BuGGE  (C.  A.). — Die  Haupt-Parabeln  Jesu.     (Giessen,  1903.) 

FiEBiG    (P.)- — Die    Gleichnisreden   Jesu   im    Lichte    der   Rabbinischen 

Gleichnisse.     (Tubingen,  1912.) 
JULiCHER  (A.). — Die  Gleichnisreden  Jesu.     (Leipzig,  1899.) 
Woods  (E.  S.). — Studies  in  the  Parables  of  Christ.     (London :  S.C.M., 

1908.) 
ZuRHELLEN   (Else   und   Otto). — Wie  erzdhlen  wir  den  Kindern  die 

biblischen  Geschichten  ?     (Tiibingen,  1906.) 


CHAPTER  X 

THE   PROBLEM   OF   THE   MIRACLES 

The  Miracles  in  Christian  History  and  Life. — The  Modern  Situation 
— The  Educational  Value  of  the  Miracles — Their  Relation  to  the 
Gospel — To  Religious  Growth — To  Christian  Tradition, 

The  Miracles  in  Early  Childhood. — The  Miraculous  Narratives  as 
Wonder-Stories — Essential  Features  of  Educational  Wonder- 
Stories — The  Miraculous  Narratives  of  the  Gospels. 

The  Acts  oj  Healing. — The  Needs  of  Childhood — The  Attitude  of 
the  Teacher — The  Acts  of  Healing  as  Historical — Illustration 
of  their  Use. 

The  Use  of  Legend. — Legendary  Narratives  in  the  Gospels — Illustra- 
tion of  their  Use — Story  of  the  Daughter  of  Jairus. 

Miracles  and  the  Christian  Gospel. — The  Special  Task  of  the 
Teacher — The  Religious  Significance  of  the  Miracles — The  Needs 
of  Adolescence — How  they  can  be  Met. 


THE  MIRACLES  IN  CHRISTIAN  LIFE  AND 
HISTORY 

The  Modern  Situation 

The  particular  problem  to  be  discussed  in  this  chapter 
is  that  which  concerns  the  value  and  place  of  the  miraculous 
narratives  of  the  Gospels  in  Biblical  Instruction,  especially 
as  it  faces  the  Christian  teacher  who  accepts  the  verdict 
of  modern  literary  and  historical  criticism  upon  these 
narratives.  It  is  probable  that  he  may  still  be  able  to 
look  upon  many  of  the  strange  acts  of  healing  which  are 
recorded  of  Jesus  as  actual  facts.  It  is  quite  as  probable 
that  he  has  already  been  led  to  consider  many  other 
miraculous  narratives,  either  as  exaggerated  reports  of 
natural   incidents    or   as    the    transformation   of   sayings 

i8i 


i82    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

and  parables  into  events  or  as  the  projection  of  psycho- 
logical facts  into  the  external  world  or  as  being  due  to 
the  influence  of  Old  Testament  predictions  and  narratives. 
While  he  recognizes  that  Jesus  did  possess  marvellous 
powers  to  which  it  is  difficult  to  set  a  limit,  he  is  at  the 
same  time  convinced  that  the  sun  or  the  earth  never  stood 
still,  that  an  ass  never  spoke  human  words  and  that  a 
storm  was  never  stilled  by  a  word. 

So  he  wants  to  know  whether  and  how  he  is  to  go  on 
telling  these  stories — not  only  of  Jesus  healing  the  sick, 
but  also  of  Jesus  walking  on  the  sea,  feeding  the  thousands 
and  raising  the  dead,  as  well  as  stories  of  His  miraculous 
birth  and  physical  resurrection.  He  believes  them  to  be 
legendary  in  character.  His  faith  is  quite  independent 
of  them.  They  are  even  a  burden  upon  it  rather  than  a 
help  to  it. 

The  first  impulse  of  such  a  teacher  is  to  throw  such 
narratives  on  one  side  as  worthless,  not  only  for  himself, 
but  also  for  the  children  he  is  teaching.  He  has  a  feeling 
that  if  he  uses  them  at  all  he  becomes  untruthful  and  some- 
thing of  a  hypocrite.  And  when  he  can  persuade  himself 
to  employ  these  narratives  in  his  teaching,  his  constant 
temptation  is  to  rationalize  them — to  reduce  them  in 
some  crude  fashion  into  natural  events. 

Such  a  result  would  certainly  be  a  very  serious 
calamity  for  moral  and  religious  instruction.  It  only 
needs,  however,  some  little  consideration  of  this  whole 
matter  from  an  educational  point  of  view  to  lead  him 
to  a  very  different  conclusion.  The  question  of  the  value 
and  use  of  these  miraculous  narratives  cannot  thus  be 
settled  in  a  summary  fashion  and  in  bulk,  nor  is  it  settled 
simply  by  the  theological  or  scientific  views  of  adults 
upon  the  question  of  miracles. 

Educational  Value  of  the  Miracles 

If  all  the  miraculous  narratives  of  the  Gospels  were 
absolutely  historical,  it  would  not  follow  that  they  would 
be  of  any  value  for  the  purposes  of  religious  education. 
On  the  other  hand,  if  they  were  all  absolutely  unhistorical, 
they  might  still  be  of  the  utmost  importance  educationally. 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  183 

At  bottom  the  problem  we  are  dealing  with  is  not 
really  theological  but  educational.  Its  solution  depends 
not  so  much  on  the  correctness  of  our  theological  or 
scientific  views  as  on  the  educational  value  of  the  moral 
content  of  the  narratives.  In  its  turn  the  educational 
value  of  these  stories  depends  partly  on  the  general  aim 
of  our  teaching,  partly  upon  the  laws  and  stages  of  religious 
growth,  and  partly  upon  the  character  and  history  of  the 
stories  themselves. 


Relation  to  the  Gospel 

1.  So  far  as  the  general  aim  of  our  teaching  is  con- 
cerned, every  Christian  teacher  would  agree  that,  by  the 
time  our  pupils  go  out  into  the  world,  we  ought  to  have 
transmitted  the  Christian  Gospel  to  them  in  such  a  way 
as  to  make  them  realize  it  first  of  all,  at  any  rate,  as  a 
moral  force.  Their  readiness  to  obey  it  should  not  depend 
upon  their  belief  or  disbelief  in  the  historical  character 
of  such  a  narrative  as  that  of  Jesus  cursing  the  fig-tree 
or  feeding  the  multitude  with  a  few  loaves  and  fishes. 
It  follows  that,  whatever  may  be  our  methods  of  dealing 
with  the  miracles,  our  teaching  should  not  in  the  end 
make  the  interest  and  the  importance  of  the  stories  centre 
upon  their  miraculous  elements,  but  upon  any  moral 
purpose  or  message  they  may  contain. 

The  impression  finally  left  upon  the  mind  must  be 
not  that  Jesus  could  work  miracles,  but  that  the  Jesus 
of  whom  these  stories  could  be  told  was  such  that  out  of 
His  deep  love  for  men  He  was  ready  to  spend  and  be 
spent  in  their  service.  It  is  the  moral  and  not  the  physical 
power  of  Jesus  that  belongs  to  the  Gospel.  The  climax 
of  the  teaching  must  be  to  put  the  miracles  in  their  proper 
relation  to  the  Christian  Gospel  and  to  explain  their  past 
and  present  value  for  the  Gospel.  It  is  here  in  this  last 
stage  of  our  teaching  that  the  difference  in  scientific  and 
theological  views  comes  fully  into  sight.  It  is  here  that 
the  origin  and  value  of  the  miraculous  as  a  whole  must 
be  discussed. 

2.  Apart  from  our  aim,  we  must  also  be  led  in  this 
matter   by  the   laws   and   stages   of  moral  and  religious 


i84    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

growth.  The  most  evident  fact  here  is  that  the  first 
business  of  the  teacher  is  to  cultivate  and  guide  the  sense 
of  wonder  and  the  imagination  of  the  child.  To  be 
effective,  rehgious  teaching  must  in  some  way  make  its 
contact  with  that  region.  The  rehgious  hfe  springs  from 
it,  and  must  travel  through  it  before  it  can  take  possession 
of  the  intellect  and  the  will. 


Relation  to  Religious  Growth 

It  is  also  certain  that  in  the  earlier  years  of  childhood 
the  distinction  which  we  draw  between  the  probable 
and  the  improbable,  even  between  the  possible  and  the 
impossible,  does  not  exist.  There  is  no  problem  of 
miracles — at  any  rate  so  far  as  degrees  of  probability  are 
concerned.  Raising  the  dead  and  walking  on  the  sea 
are  as  easy  or  as  difficult  to  believe,  as  real  and  as  true 
to  the  child,  as  healing  the  sick  or  any  other  event  outside 
the  child's  ordinary  experience.  So  far  as  the  children 
are  concerned,  the  problem  is  not  whether  the  story  we 
tell  contains  what  may  be  called  a  miracle,  but  whether 
the  miracle  is  of  the  right  kind.  Does  it  grip  the  imagina- 
tion, and  does  it  grip  the  imagination  in  the  right  way? 
Does  it  simply  glut  the  imagination  to  idle  satiety,  or 
does  it  employ  the  imagination  in  order  to  reach  the  mind 
and  the  will  ?  It  probably  ought  to  be  added  that  the 
adult  teacher  must  not  be  in  too  much  of  a  hurry  to  impress 
his  own  unimaginative  views  with  regard  to  the  import- 
ance of  historical  accuracy  and  the  improbability  of  the 
cruder  miraculous  narratives  upon  the  mind  of  the  child. 
The  child  lives  in  a  world  of  make-believe  for  a  longer 
time  than  is  sometimes  imagined.  For  him  there  is  no 
reason  why  angels  should  not  want  food,  why  serpents 
and  asses  should  not  speak,  why  axes  should  not  swim, 
and  why  prophets  should  not  travel  in  whales.  In  his 
own  due  time  he  will  shed  that  world  naturally  if  only 
we  will  let  him  alone  and  give  him  a  little  help  only  when 
we  have  found  that  he  is  doing  so. 

Here,  therefore,  the  views  of  the  teacher  as  to  miracles 
are  simply  out  of  court.  If  he  cannot  leave  his  views 
behind  him,  and  enter  into  the  credulous  mind  of  childhood 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  185 

for  the  time  being,  he  should  not  attempt  to  teach  children 
at  all.  Each  miraculous  narrative  must  be  judged  on 
its  own  merits,  and  whether  we  use  it  or  not  depends 
upon  the  character,  the  motive  and  effect  of  the  miraculous 
deed.  Its  marvellous  nature  is  a  merit  rather  than  a 
defect  if  its  marvel  is  of  the  right  kind. 

Relation  to  Christian  Tradition 

3.  Moreover,  the  Christian  teacher  cannot  forget  that 
the  stories  of  miracles  have  always  been  part  and  parcel 
of  the  Christian  tradition.  It  is  not  as  if  he  had  a  choice 
whether  to  deal  with  them  or  disregard  them.  The 
latter  he  simply  cannot  do,  for  they  are  inextricably 
bound  up  with  all  the  records  we  have  of  the  life  of  Jesus 
which  must  always  be  the  very  centre  of  Christian  teach- 
ing. This,  indeed,  suggests  the  most  serious  problem  we 
have  to  deal  with. 

There  is  a  point  at  which  historical  fact  becomes 
necessary  for  the  child,  and  when  he  begins  to  distinguish 
between  imagination  and  history.  It  is  then  we  are 
bound  to  give  some  sort  of  historical  life  of  Jesus.  The 
teacher  may  then  be  called  upon  to  speak  of  legend  as 
legend,  and  at  the  same  time  to  protect  the  child  from 
thinking  that  legends  and  lies  are  convertible  terms. 
He  must  be  able  to  use  miraculous  narratives  from  the 
Gospels  because  they  are  an  essential  element  in  the 
earliest  Christian  tradition,  and  yet  at  the  same  time  he 
must  remain  true  to  his  own  convictions,  and  also  stand 
guard  over  the  continuity  of  the  child's  growth  in  passing 
from  the  world  of  imagination  to  the  world  of  fact. 

From  this  brief  consideration  of  the  characteristics 
and  needs  of  childhood,  the  place  of  miraculous  narratives 
in  the  earliest  Christian  tradition  and  the  general  aim  of 
Christian  teaching,  three  questions  with  regard  to  the 
miraculous  narratives  of  the  Bible  emerge  : 

1.  What   is   the   independent   educative   value   of  the 
individual   stories   used   as   Wonder-tales    in   early   child 
hood  when  the  imagination  must  be  gripped  and  employed 
by  the  teacher  in  order  to  reach  the  will  ? 

2.  How   is    the    teacher,    who    '  does    not    believe    in 


i86    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

miracles/  to  deal  with  the  stories  of  miracle  in  the 
Gospels  when  in  late  childhood  the  historical  life  of  Jesus 
must  be  told  and  the  difference  between  facts  and  legends 
must  be  recognized  ? 

3.  How  can  the  whole  question  of  the  miraculous  be 
discussed  during  adolescence  in  such  a  way  as  to  make 
the  origin  and  character  of  these  narratives  as  legend  and 
folk-poetry  plain — in  such  a  way  also  as  to  show  their 
proper  relation  to  the  Christian  Gospel  as  well  as  to 
preserve  and  emphasize  all  that  is  of  real  value  in  them  ? 

The  educational  problem  of  the  miraculous  narratives 
in  each  of  these  forms  will  be  discussed  in  the  following 
sections  with  the  hope  of  indicating  the  main  lines  upon 
which  the  solution  must  be  sought. 


2 
THE  MIRACLES  IN  EARLY  CHILDHOOD 

Miraculous  Narratives  as  Wonder-Tales 

In  early  childhood,  as  has  been  said,  the  critical  and 
historical  question  with  regard  to  the  miraculous  does  not 
arise  either  for  the  teacher  or  the  child.  The  strictly 
miraculous  narratives  will  stand  on  exactly  the  same  level 
as  all  other  marvellous  stories  which  are  only  outside 
the  narrow  experience  of  the  child. 

The  question  for  the  teacher  is  not  whether  a  story 
describes  a  natural  event  or  a  miracle,  but  whether,  as  a 
whole,  it  is  of  such  a  character  as  to  cultivate  the  imagina- 
tion in  the  right  way.  It  is  by  more  or  less  miraculous 
narratives  in  the  wide  sense  that  this  can  best  be  done  as 
a  rule.  It  does  not,  however,  follow  that  every  story  of 
'  miracle  '  in  the  Bible  is  suitable  for  the  purpose.  The 
teacher  is  in  need  of  single  Wonder-stories,  complete  in 
themselves,  and  each  one  must  fulfil  certain  conditions, 
moral  and  educational,  before  he  can  use  them  with  a 
good  conscience  at  this  period.  He  cannot,  therefore, 
consider  the  miraculous  narratives  of  the  Bible  in  such  a 
way  as  to  accept  or  reject  them  en  bloc. 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  187 

He  must  rather  look  at  each  story  independently  in 
order  to  find  out  whether  in  spirit,  content  and  form  it  is 
of  such  a  character  as  to  be  available  for  his  purposes. 
As  a  test  for  every  tale  that  offers  itself,  he  must  have 
in  his  mind  certain  conditions  upon  the  fulfilment  of  which 
alone  a  story  can  be  admitted  into  the  membership  of  the 
sacred  circle  of  the  pictorial  images  he  must  print  upon  the 
child's  imagination. 

Essential  Features  of  Wonder-Stories 

It  will  not  be  very  difficult  to  set  forth  such  con- 
ditions in  a  series  of  statements  with  the  confident  hope 
that  the  demands  impHed  in  them  will  at  once  appear 
reasonable  to  those  who  have  given  any  attention  to  the 
needs  of  early  childhood. 

It  is  taken  for  granted,  to  start  with,  that  every  story 
chosen  should  be  told  freely  to  the  children  and  not  read 
either  by  them  or  by  the  teacher.  Then,  every  good 
Wonder-story,  whether  Biblical  or  not,  fit  for  use  in  moral 
and  religious  instruction  should  bear  upon  it  the  following 
marks  : 

1 .  The  story  must  be  of  such  a  character  as  to  appeal 
vividly  to  the  imagination,  or  it  must  at  least  jneld  to 
imaginative  treatment. 

2.  The  story  must  not  contain  anything  grossly 
superstitious,  and  must  not,  as  a  rule,  call  attention  to  any 
forms  of  wickedness  or  sin  that  are  not  already  familiar  to 
the  child.  At  least  it  must  be  possible  easily  to  eliminate 
such  features  if  they  are  present  without  spoiling  the 
story. 

3.  The  mere  marvel  or  miracle  must  not  be  the  only  or 
the  main  point  of  interest  in  the  story. 

4.  Incidentally  or  otherwise,  the  story  must  be  such  as 
is  capable  of  expressing  a  moral  action.  It  must,  that  is, 
contain  or  lend  itself  easily  to  conveying  something  of 
positive  moral  value — a  moral  quality  that  stands  in  some 
actual  relation  to  the  child's  life. 

5.  The  story  must  be  such  as  can  be  put  into  more  or 
less  of  a  psychological  form.  By  this  is  meant  that  the 
action  must  be  such  as  can  be  connected  with  the  simpler 


i88    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

working  of  the  mind.  We  must  be  able  to  make  the 
child  follow  not  only  the  external  action,  but  also  some  of 
the  more  elementary  thoughts  and  feelings  of  the  actors 
in  the  drama.  The  purpose  and  the  effect  of  the  action 
must  become  more  or  less  clear.  Probably,  therefore,  God 
should  not  appear  much  as  a  direct  actor  on  the  stage. 
He  must  rather  be  the  background  and  atmosphere  of 
every  tale — the  hidden  but  real  inspiration  of  the  human 
drama.  As  God  works  in  history,  so  we  should  give  an 
impression  of  His  working  in  instruction — mediated 
through  the  deeds  of  religious  personalities. 

If  these  conditions  are  fulfilled  in  a  Wonder-story,  then 
it  might  be  said  that  the  more  marvellous  and  miraculous 
the  narrative,  the  better  it  suits  our  purpose  at  this  stage. 
That  means  to  say  that  the  greater  or  less  degree  of 
historical  probability  a  story  possesses  is  not  a  matter  of 
much  consequence  compared  with  the  fulfilment  of  the 
foregoing  conditions. 

Miraculous  Narratives  of  the  Gospels 

The  Christian  teacher,  therefore,  must  ask  how  many 
of  the  miraculous  narratives  of  the  Bible  do  actually  or 
can  easily  be  made  to  conform  to  this  standard  ?  As  a 
matter  of  fact,  probably  few  or  none  of  them  are  quite 
suitable  for  children  between  six  and  eight  years  of  age 
in  exactly  their  present  Biblical  forms.  On  the  other 
hand,  there  are  many  of  them  that  can  more  or  less  easily 
be  adapted  for  this  purpose.  The  changes  required  will 
naturally  vary  with  each  story.  Some,  for  instance, 
like  the  stories  of  the  birth  and  childhood  of  Jesus,  need 
only  a  few  changes  in  form,  setting  and  language  in 
order  to  make  them  ideal  Wonder-stories.  As  much  as 
possible  of  the  charm  of  the  quaint  language  of  the  Bible 
should  be  retained,  though  something  of  it  must  inevitably 
be  lost  in  the  attempt  to  avoid  words  that  need  explana- 
tion in  the  case  of  children  of  this  age.  That  will  always 
be  the  case  whenever  we  tell  any  Biblical  stories  in  early 
childhood. 

There  are  other  stories,  such  as  the  '  Stilling  of  the 
Storm  '    and    '  The    Feeding    of    the    Multitude,'   which 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  189 

require  more  radical  changes  before  the  above  conditions 
are  fulfilled.  In  spirit  and  general  content  they  will 
suit  our  purpose  well  enough  ;  but,  as  they  are  told  in 
the  Gospels,  it  is  probable  that  they  would  miss  their  aim 
in  the  case  of  the  children.  There  is  a  danger  that  the 
interest  would  become  concentrated  upon  the  mere 
miracle  rather  than  upon  the  sympathy  of  Jesus  and  His 
goodness  of  heart.  The  moral  quality  cannot  be  impressed 
upon  the  mind  by  simply  pointing  it  out  at  the  end.  It 
must  be  woven  with  the  thread  of  the  whole  tale,  so  that 
the  children  may  feel,  even  without  being  told,  that  Jesus 
loved  to  help  men,  or  that  Jesus  was  too  good  a  man 
to  be  afraid  of  a  storm,  instead  of  merely  thinking  that 
Jesus  could  work  miracles.  Thus,  in  the  story  of  the 
Storm  at  Sea,  for  instance,  all  the  art  of  the  story-teller 
would  be  employed  in  making  an  effective  contrast 
between  the  deep  peace  of  Jesus  and  the  restless  agony 
of  the  terror-stricken  disciples.  This,  for  young  children 
at  any  rate,  is  not  effectively  done  by  the  words  '  He  slept,' 
and  *  Lord,  help  us,  we  perish,'  which,  of  course,  do  the 
work  thoroughly  for  adults  who  read  the  story.  For 
children,  it  must  be  further  and  more  fully  illustrated  by 
some  description  of  the  scenes  on  board  that  must  have 
led  up  to  these  words. 

There  are,  of  course,  other  miraculous  narratives  in  the 
Gospels  which  it  would  be  very  difficult,  if  not  impossible, 
to  adapt  as  Wonder-stories  without  destroying  them 
altogether.  Such,  for  instance,  are  the  stories  of  the 
Resurrection  and  the  Ascension,  Cursing  the  Fig-tree,  the 
Raising  of  Lazarus  and  many  others.  It  may  be  possible 
to  use  them  later  on  in  another  way,  but  here,  at  any  rate, 
they  seem  to  be  out  of  the  question. 

Probably  the  result  of  a  fuller  consideration  of  the 
miraculous  narratives  of  the  Gospels  would  be  the  making 
of  a  good  selection  of  them  for  use  as  Wonder-tales  to  be 
told  in  a  fuller  and  more  or  less  different  form — not  with 
a  view  to  eliminating  the  miracle,  but  in  order  to  make 
them  conform  to  the  conditions  which  have  been  mentioned. 
In  such  a  selection  would  be  included  the  Christmas 
Stories,  the  Stilling  of  the  Storm,  Walking  on  the  Sea, 
Feeding  the  Multitude,  Raising  the  Widow's  Son,  Healing 


iQo    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

the  Epileptic  Boy  and  others.  In  each  case  it  will  be 
the  work  of  the  teacher  to  read  the  story  over  carefully 
and  to  ask  himself  whether  and  how  each  can  be  retold 
in  such  a  form  as  to  grip  the  imagination,  while  at  the 
same  time  making  the  mere  exercise  of  miraculous  power 
subservient  to  any  good  moral  purpose,  and  showing 
the  movement  of  the  minds  of  the  characters  as  well  as 
the  external  action. 

All  this,  of  course,  means  more  work  for  the  teacher, 
who  will,  however,  find  his  reward  in  more  effective 
teaching. 

3 
THE  ACTS  OF  HEALING 

So  far  the  question  of  literary  and  historical  criticism 
has  not  arisen  in  any  acute  form  either  for  teacher  or 
scholar.  All  the  teaching  takes  the  form  of  single  stories, 
and  the  value  of  each  miraculous  narrative  ought  to  be 
judged  by  its  power  to  grip  the  imagination  for  moral 
and  religious  ends. 

The  Needs  of  Childhood 

After  the  age  of  eight  or  nine,  however,  the  teaching 
must  become  more  connected.  The  material  must  be 
grouped  and  become  more  historical.  It  is  here  that 
connected  life-stories  of  great  personalities  are  in  place, 
and  the  teacher  is  called  upon  to  give  narratives  of  the 
lives  of  Moses,  David,  Paul,  and  especially  to  teach  the 
life  of  Jesus  as  a  whole.  In  most  of  these  biographies 
the  question  of  miracles  will  have  to  be  faced  in  some 
form  or  other,  and  for  many  reasons  it  becomes  a  rather 
difficult  problem  in  dealing  with  the  life  of  Jesus. 

The  question  of  the  general  form  which  the  life  of 
Jesus  should  take  for  children  between  the  ages  of  nine 
and  twelve  or  thirteen  has  already  been  discussed.  At 
first,  at  any  rate,  it  should  be  told  by  the  teacher  in 
narrative  form  and  not  simply  read  or  studied  with 
comments  in  any  one  of  the  Gospels.     Its  main  object 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  igi 

should  be  to  give  the  children  a  concrete  and  clear  picture 
of  the  life,  work  and  teaching  of  Jesus  as  a  real  human  life 
lived  among  men.  In  doing  this  the  critical  problem 
of  what  is  historical  and  what  is  not  does  not  and  ought 
not  to  arise  in  any  definite  form  for  the  children.  Of 
them  the  only  thing  that  can  in  most  cases  be  said  is 
that  they  are  beginning  to  realize  in  a  general  way  the 
difference  between  actual  facts  and  the  product  of  the 
imagination.  They  may  at  any  moment  ask  whether 
some  individual  incident  is  really  '  true  '  or  not,  and  they 
will  not  be  ready  to  accept  any  kind  of  tale  as  actual 
fact  without  question. 

For  the  teacher,  on  the  other  hand,  the  critical  question 
does  arise  in  an  aggravated  form  when  he  is  face  to  face 
with  the  task  of  giving  the  children  some  clear  if  elementary 
picture  of  what  Jesus  actually  was  and  said  and  did. 
It  is  certainly  not  his  business  to  discuss  critical  questions 
in  teaching  children,  but  quite  as  certainly  he  is  bound 
to  preserve  his  own  intellectual  integrity.  He  must  not 
play  fast  and  loose  with  the  Biblical  narratives,  nor  is 
he  justified  in  simply  forcing  his  own  views  upon  the 
child,  whether  they  are  radical  or  conservative.  His  own 
views  will  and  must,  without  doubt,  influence  the  form 
of  his  narrative,  but  the  value  of  his  narrative  in  giving 
a  picture  of  Jesus  should  not  depend  exclusively  upon 
acceptance  of  his  views. 

The  real  problem,  therefore,  is  how  he  can  remain 
faithful  to  his  own  convictions  and  still  not  tyrannize 
over  either  the  mind  of  the  child  or  the  Biblical  stories. 
It  is  this  problem  which  becomes  urgent  for  the  teacher 
in  the  case  of  the  miracles  of  the  Gospels.  How  is  he 
going  to  deal  with  these  narratives  in  telling  the  life  of 
Jesus  to  children  between  nine  and  twelve  years  of  age  ? 

The  Attitude  of  the  Teacher 

The  probability  is  that  he  has  found  no  reason  to 
change  his  conviction  that  many  of  the  acts  of  healing 
recorded  in  the  Gospels  are  historical  facts — more  especially 
the  healing  of  nervous  diseases  and  some  of  their  physical 
results,  such  as  blindness,  deafness  and  sometimes  lame- 


192    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

ness,  as  well  as  probably  some  skin  diseases  that  were  at 
that  time  confused  with  real  leprosy  and  called  by  that 
name.  He  will  not  be  anxious  to  make  the  range  of 
historical  fact  a  narrow  one,  believing  as  he  does  in  the 
unique  nature  of  the  personality  of  Jesus  and  realizing 
the  extraordinary  effect  such  a  personality  may  well 
have  had.  At  the  same  time,  for  many  reasons,  such 
stories  as  those  of  Raising  the  Dead,  Walking  on  the  Sea, 
Feeding  the  Thousands  and  others  of  a  similar  kind  will 
almost  inevitably  have  a  legendary  or  only  a  parabolic 
character  for  him,  though  there  may  be  some  historical 
elements  underlying  them.  This  will  be  true  also  of  the 
Birth  narratives  and  of  most  of  the  Resurrection  and 
Ascension  stories  in  their  present  form,  as  well  as  of  the 
accounts  of  the  Temptation  and  the  Transfiguration. 

Now,  the  first  thing  such  a  teacher  has  to  do  is  to 
recognize  how  closely  the  miraculous  narratives  are  inter- 
woven with  the  life,  teaching  and  work  of  Jesus  as 
described  in  the  Gospels.  Even  if  he  desired  to  do  so, 
it  is  impossible  for  him  either  to  ignore  or  to  eliminate 
them.  He  is  not  called  upon  to  include  them  all  in  his 
narrative,  but  a  representative  selection  of  them  must 
have  a  place  in  some  form  or  other. 

Miracles  of  Healing 

There  will  not  be  much  difficulty  about  the  miracles 
of  healing.  A  number  of  these  from  the  Gospel  of  Mark 
he  can  tell  as  integral  parts  of  the  historical  life.  He  can 
thus  describe  the  healing  of  the  madman  in  the  Synagogue 
(i.  22-27),  Simon's  mother-in-law  (i.  29-31),  the  paralysed 
man  (ii.  1-12),  the  deaf  stammerer  (vii.  31-37),  the 
epileptic  boy  (ix.  14-29),  blind  Bartimaeus  (x.  46-52) 
and  perhaps  two  or  three  others.  For  each  he  must  find 
an  appropriate  setting,  with  a  view  to  making  them 
intelligible  as  real  experiences  for  the  people  present,  for 
the  persons  healed  and  for  Jesus  Himself.  This  setting 
will,  as  a  rule,  in  outline  at  least,  be  found  in  the  Gospels, 
but  it  does  not  matter  much  whether  it  is  really  historical 
or  simply  invented  by  the  evangelist  or  by  the  teacher 
for  the  purpose.     Naturally,  no  attempt  should  be  made 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  193 

to  explain  the  cures  in  each  case,  and  the  common  phrase 
'  possessed  by  demons  '  must  be  retained  with  an  ex- 
planation that  evil  spirits  were  then  supposed  to  bring 
the  diseases.  The  main  effort  of  the  teacher  should  be 
given  to  describing  the  scene,  the  feelings  and  words  of 
the  actors  and  spectators  in  such  a  way  as  to  make  an 
impression  of  the  extraordinary  effect  produced  by  the 
words,  attitude,  look  and  will — in  fact,  of  the  whole 
personality  of  Jesus  upon  other  minds  and  wills. 

It  is  probable  that  some  legendary  elements  have  crept 
even  into  these  stories  of  healing,  but  they  are  insignificant, 
and  in  retelling  the  story  the  teacher  can  avoid  them  very 
easily  without  interfering  with  the  meaning  of  the  narrative. 

In  order  to  illustrate  this  method  of  dealing  with  the 
acts  of  healing  as  part  of  the  life  of  Jesus,  it  may  be  well 
to  give  one  example  of  its  application  as  it  has  been  worked 
out  by  Else  and  Otto  Zurhellen.^ 

Let  us  suppose,  then,  that  in  giving  a  connected  narra- 
tive of  the  life  of  Jesus  we  have  reached  the  first  day 
of  His  public  activity  in  Capernaum.  In  Mark  i.  21-34 
there  is  a  very  brief  summary  of  what  happened  on  that 
day.  The  cure  of  the  possessed  man  and  of  Simon's 
mother-in-law  are  narrated  at  some  length.  Others  are 
only  referred  to,  and  we  are  told  that  "  the  people  were 
greatly  struck  with  the  teaching  of  Jesus,  for  He  was 
teaching  them  like  One  who  had  authority  and  not  like 
the  Rabbis."  The  business  of  the  teacher  is  to  reproduce 
as  much  as  he  can  of  this  impression. 

Illustration  of  their  Use 

In  order  to  do  that  for  the  children  he  must  give  a 
much  more  concrete  picture  of  the  scene  than  is  given  in 
Mark.  He  must  tell  the  story  in  such  a  way  as  to  make 
the  children  re-experience  its  events  with  some  one  who 
saw  the  whole  thing.  For  that  purpose  the  narrative 
must  be  given  from  the  point  of  view  of  some  one  who 
saw  and  felt  the  effect.  Let  it  be  a  labourer  from  one 
of  the  narrow  streets  of  Capernaum.  Give  him  and  all 
the   chief  actors   names.      Follow  him  that   Sabbath   to 

1  Wie  erzdhlen  mr  den  Kindern  die  Bihlischen  Geschichten?    (Mohr,  1906.) 
13 


194    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

the  Synagogue.  Describe  the  ordinary  service  there  and 
an  ordinary  address  by  a  Rabbi,  as  well  as  the  feelings 
of  our  hearer.  Jesus  standing  up  to  speak  excites 
curiosity  as  a  stranger.  Give  as  His  address  some  of  the 
sayings  of  the  Sermon  on  the  Mount  and  one  of  His  parables, 
making  the  contrast  between  it  and  the  preceding  address 
as  clear  and  sharp  as  possible.  Then  describe  the  attitude 
and  the  natural  comments  of  the  congregation.  The 
address  is  interrupted  by  the  forced  entrance  of  the 
possessed  man  who  is  well  known.  Describe  him  briefly, 
and  the  conversation  between  him  and  Jesus,  giving 
their  attitudes,  looks,  gestures  vividly.  Then  comes 
the  astonishing  power  of  Jesus  to  calm  him,  the  renewed 
surprise  and  excitement  and  the  comments  :  "  What  a 
man  !  "  "He  has  power  over  evil  spirits  !  "  "A 
miracle  !  "  "  Did  you  see  how  He  looked  like  a  king  !  " 
"  Marvellous  !  I  never  saw  anything  like  it  !  "  "  Just 
now  the  words  and  then  the  deed  !  "  The  service  breaks 
up  in  the  excitement  of  the  cry  :  "  A  prophet !  a  prophet !  " 
A  vivid  narrative  built  on  some  such  lines  as  these  will 
certainly  help  to  make  the  life  of  Jesus  real  to  the  children 
even.  It  provides  the  only  setting  for  the  miracles  of 
healing,  for  it  is  an  attempt  to  reproduce  what  must 
have  been  behind  the  short  summaries  of  the  Gospels, 

There  will  always  remain  differences  of  opinion  as  to 
exactly  how  many  and  which  of  these  acts  of  healing 
can  still  be  accepted  and  narrated  as  actual  facts  and  as 
integral  parts  of  the  historical  life  of  Jesus.  Different 
teachers  will  probably  draw  the  line  at  different  places. 
In  any  case,  each  teacher  can  only  give  as  actual  history 
at  this  stage  those  incidents  which  he  considers  to  be  so. 


4 
THE  USE  OF  LEGEND 

Legendary  Narratives 

There  is  a  second  type  of  miraculous  narrative  in  the 
Gospels,  namely,  that  of  which  the  raising  of  the  widow's 
son  and  the  feeding  of  the  multitude  are  representative. 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  195 

Some  of  these  are  now  interpreted  as  exaggerations  of 
actual  incidents,  some  as  due  to  the  influence  of  Old 
Testament  sayings,  some  as  parables  transformed  into 
events,  while  the  origin  of  others  is  obscure.  In  any  case, 
for  some  reason  or  other,  they  are  all  considered  more  or 
less  legendary  in  character. 

It  must  be  confessed  at  the  outset  that  the  teacher 
who  holds  this  view  is  faced  by  a  serious  difficulty  when 
he  tries  to  tell  the  life-story  of  Jesus  to  children  between 
the  ages,  of  nine  and  twelve  or  thirteen.  It  has  already 
been  pointed  out  that  at  an  earlier  time  he  can  with  a 
good  conscience  put  his  critical  views  behind  his  back 
and  use  many  of  these  narratives  as  Wonder-stories, 
absolutely  indifferent  as  to  whether  they  are  historical 
or  not.  At  a  later  period,  too,  in  adolescence  he  can 
discuss  the  whole  question  of  the  miraculous  and  legendary 
elements  in  the  Gospels  quite  frankly  with  his  scholars 
with  profit,  and  with  no  danger  to  their  reverence  for 
Jesus  and  the  New  Testament.  But  in  late  childhood 
he  can  do  neither  the  one  thing  nor  the  other.  For  the 
teacher  himself,  the  critical  question  becomes  urgent  in 
an  acute  form.  He  must  have  some  definite  opinion  as  to 
the  character  of  these  narratives.  On  the  other  hand, 
he  cannot  discuss  literary  and  historical  questions  criti- 
cally with  the  children.  Neither  can  he  give  to  them  as 
history  that  which  seems  to  him  to  be  either  doubtful  or 
definitely  legendary.  What,  then,  is  he  to  do  ?  He  is  not 
justified  in  simply  disregarding  such  narratives.  By  so 
doing  he  would  not  only  fail  to  reproduce  the  atmo- 
sphere of  the  Gospels,  but  he  would  also  miss  some  of  the 
best  concrete  illustrations  of  the  teaching  and  character 
of  Jesus.  All  attempts  that  have  hitherto  been  made  to 
construct  a  rationalistic  life  of  Jesus  in  any  living  way 
have  been  failures. 

There  is  also  a  good  deal  to  be  said  for  the  view  that 
these  narratives  should  be  so  dealt  with  as  to  leave  the 
way  open  later  on  either  to  show  their  legendary  character 
or  to  defend  them  as  historical.  It  would  not  be  quite  fair 
to  shut  the  door  finally  upon  either  of  these  alternatives. 

So  far  as  one  can  see  the  best  way  out  of  the  difficulty 
is  that  suggested  and  taken  by  Else  and  Otto  Zurhellen 


196    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

in  their  book  on  the  Bible  stories.  They  describe  their 
method  as  illustrated  by  the  story  of  the  daughter  of 
Jairus  (which  they  regard  as  legendary)  as  follows  : 


Illustration  of  their  Use 

"  What,  however,  we  recognize  as  legend  we  shall 
narrate  also  as  such.  The  best  method  of  doing  so  appears 
to  us  to  be  that  we  should  give  the  legendary  material 
as  descriptions  of  the  impression  which  the  advent  of  the 
great  personality  makes  upon  men.  As  in  the  case  of  the 
parables,  one  must  invent  situations  in  which  we  can 
place  such  a  legend  so  that  at  the  same  time  the  manner 
of  its  origin  becomes  plain.  Take  the  following  as  an 
instance  :  In  a  Galilean  village  it  becomes  known  that 
Jesus  is  coming  to-day.  The  people  gather  together  on 
the  road  which  enters  the  village,  and  wait  in  groups  for 
the  famous  prophet.  The  conversation  naturally  is  about 
Him  and  His  wonderful  deeds.  One  tells  of  His  healing  a 
lame  man  in  Capernaum.  Another  insists  that  there  were 
two  lame  men  whom  He  made  whole  at  the  same  time. 

"  A  third  does  not  consider  such  acts  of  healing  so 
very  marvellous  ;  others  had  done  the  same  thing,  and 
even  greater  things.  He  is  fiercely  contradicted.  One 
man  who  has  been  standing  somewhat  on  one  side  notices 
the  warm  discussion  going  on,  comes  nearer  and  hears 
what  they  are  talking  about.  '  Shall  I  tell  you,'  says  he, 
'  what  I  heard  a  few  days  ago  at  Magdala  ?  '  He  gets 
everybody's  attention.  Then  he  tells  them  the  story  of 
Jesus  and  the  little  daughter  of  Jairus  (Mark  v.  21-24, 
35-43)  amidst  the  running  comments  and  exclamations 
of  the  bystanders  in  which  their  feelings,  their  sympathy, 
their  expectation  and  their  astonishment  at  Jesus  find 
utterance.  In  the  midst  of  the  excitement  caused  by  this 
story  the  cry  is  raised  '  He  is  coming.'  In  front  of  this 
episode  we  would  place  the  story  of  the  man  sick  of  the 
palsy  (Mark  ii.  1-12).  After  it  might  come  the  incident 
of  the  demand  for  a  sign  (Matt.  xvi.  1-4).  Other  legendary 
narratives  might  be  introduced  in  a  similar  way."  ^ 

Thus  inserted  here  and  there  into  the  framework  of 

»  op.  ciL,  pp.  198  ff. 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  197 

the  life  of  Jesus,  very  effective  use  can  undoubtedly  be 
made  of  the  more  or  less  legendary  narratives  of  the 
Gospels  by  the  modern  teacher.  Telling  them  on  these 
lines  he  can  preserve  his  own  intellectual  integrity,  and  at 
the  same  time  do  justice  to  the  child  and  the  spirit  of  the 
Gospels.  His  narrative  will  also  remain  within  the  region 
of  historical  probability — for  it  is  almost  certain  that 
such  stories  were  told  of  Jesus  even  within  His  own 
lifetime.  Moreover,  such  a  method  has  the  advantage 
of  leaving  the  value  and  accuracy  of  such  narratives  a 
more  or  less  open  one  for  future  discussion  later  on,  while 
at  the  same  time  it  suggests  a  natural  origin  for  legendary 
additions  to  the  life  of  Jesus. 

All  the  stories  of  miracle  cannot,  however,  be  dealt 
with  in  this  way — the  story  of  the  Gadarene  swine,  for 
instance,  and  the  cursing  of  the  fig-tree.  Only  those  that 
are  quite  evidently  consistent  with  the  known  character  of 
Jesus,  and  either  illustrate  His  teaching  or  some  of  His 
personal  qualities,  should  be  so  employed.  The  others, 
such  as  the  two  mentioned,  must  be  omitted  altogether, 
either  as  inconsistent  with  our  picture  of  Jesus  or  as  being 
without  moral  value. 

As  good  examples  of  stories  which  may  be  told  with 
effect  in  this  way  one  might  mention  the  raising  of  the 
widow's  son,  the  feeding  of  the  multitude  and  the  healing 
of  the  lepers.  One  or  two  even  of  those  narrated  in  the 
Gospel  of  John  might  be  used — the  wedding  feast  at  Cana 
and  the  raising  of  Lazarus,  for  instance — although  it 
would  probably  be  better  to  give  these  when  studying  the 
teaching  of  Jesus  by  itself  later  on  in  adolescence. 


5 
MIRACLES  AND  THE  CHRISTIAN  GOSPEL 

The  Special  Task  of  the  Teacher 

The  preceding  sections  have  been  devoted  to  a  con- 
sideration of  how  and  when  the  individual  miraculous 
narratives  of  the  Gospels  can  be  used  in  a  positive  form 


198    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

in  the  moral  and  religious  teaching  of  the  New  Testament. 
When,  however,  they  have  been  used  separately  in  early 
childhood,  and  many  of  them  have  been  included  in 
different  forms  in  teaching  the  Life  of  Christ  in  late  child- 
hood, we  have  not  by  any  means  finished  with  the  question 
of  the  miraculous  in  relation  to  Biblical  instruction. 
We  have  only  indirectly  prepared  the  way  for  distinguish- 
ing between  historical  and  legendary  elements  in  the 
Bible,  and  so  made  it  easier  for  the  mind  to  meet  the 
criticism  of  the  miraculous  narratives  which  modern  life 
will  inevitably  bring  with  it  to  every  growing  boy  and 
girl — more  and  more  so,  indeed,  as  modern  education 
becomes  more  effective  and  universal.  More  systematic 
and  direct  teaching  on  this  question  will  be  needed  if 
the  growing  adolescent  mind  is  to  be  put  into  a  position 
to  meet  without  unnecessary  strain  and  danger  both  the 
popular  and  scientific  criticism  of  the  miracles  of  the  Bible. 
It  is  not  the  business  of  the  teacher  to  eliminate  the 
supernatural  and  the  miraculous  from  the  Bible  and 
Christianity.  It  is  rather  to  give  his  pupils  a  worthy 
conception  of  the  miraculous  and  the  supernatural — to 
fit  their  meaning  into  the  modern  view  of  the  world — to 
distinguish  between  the  supernatural  and  the  merely 
arbitrary  interference  with  law,  between  extraordinary 
moral  acts  and  mere  displays  of  power  or  prodigies.  It 
is  his  business  so  to  describe  Christianity  and  its  history 
as  to  make  moral  power  and  not  physical  miracle  its 
centre.  His  spirit  must  be  that  of  the  words,  "  Blessed 
are  they  that  have  not  seen  and  yet  have  believed."  It 
is  an  attitude  towards  miracles  rather  than  opinions 
about  miracles  he  must  strive  to  fix.  He  must  recognize 
that  the  belief  in  miracles  represents  some  religious  values 
which  he  is  responsible  for  preserving.  Among  the  many 
reasons  why  the  miraculous  narratives  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment have  been  clung  to  and  are  still  clung  to  by  many 
people  are  the  following  : 

Religious  Significance  of  Miracles 

I.  They  have   become   the   expression   of  the   central 
religious  faith  that  "  we  are  not  shut  up  in  a  blind  and 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  199 

brutal  course  of  nature."  The  belief  in  miracles  is  an 
attempt  on  the  part  of  the  religious  man  to  express  his 
experience  that  his  surroundings  can  be  conquered  and 
made  to  "  work  together  for  goodness."  As  has  often 
been  pointed  out,  this  experience  is  felt  as  if  God  broke 
through  the  regular  course  of  nature  for  his  sake — that 
is  to  say,  the  event  has  all  the  appearance  of  a  miracle. 
A  mere  belief  in  the  miracles  of  the  New  Testament  alone 
can,  however,  be  neither  a  satisfactory  nor  a  full  expression 
of  this  feature  of  the  religious  life,  and  of  the  present 
reality  of  God's  help. 

What  the  teacher  has  got  to  do,  therefore,  is  to  accustom 
the  mind  to  feel  the  reality  of  God's  help  in  other  ways, 
by  making  the  relation  to  God  a  personal  and  moral  one 
rather  than  a  physical  and  material  connection. 

2.  The  New  Testament  miracles  have  also  become 
intimately  connected  with  precious  parts  of  the  Gospel 
and  faith  in  Jesus.  They  have  acquired,  in  the  words  of 
Dean  Inge,  "  a  sacramental  value."  1  They  are,  therefore, 
clung  to  tenaciously,  not  so  much  for  their  own  sakes 
as  for  the  sake  of  the  faith  of  which  they  have  become  a 
part.  Here,  again,  in  our  view,  the  connection  is  neither 
necessary  nor  useful,  but  a  perilous  one  for  the  faith. 
But  the  fact  that  the  connection  is  made  is  the  reason 
why  the  shock  of  criticism  imperils  the  Christian  faith 
of  many  in  these  days.  The  Christian  teacher  must  see 
to  it  that  the  two  do  not  stand  or  fall  together  in  the 
case  of  his  pupils. 

He  can  do  so  because  he  has  largely  in  his  hands  the 
moulding  of  both  the  historic  and  personal  faith  of  the 
child.  The  connection  between  the  miraculous  narratives 
and  the  reality  of  God's  help  on  the  one  hand  and  the 
value  of  Christ  on  the  other,  has  not  yet  been  fixed  in 
the  mind  of  the  child,  and  it  is  our  duty  to  see  that  it  is 
not  made  in  such  a  way  as  to  make  the  Christian  faith 
dependent  upon  such  narratives  as  that  of  the  Virgin 
Birth,  or  the  reanimation  of  the  body  of  Jesus,  or  the 
walking  on  the  sea.  The  necessary  connection  should 
be  made  exclusively  with  the  moral  and  religious  elements 
of  the  teaching  and  personality  of   Jesus.     That  is  the 

^  Truth  and  Falsehood  in  Religion,  p.  103. 


200    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

only  way  to  prepare  the  mind  to  move  freely  and  in- 
dependently later  on  amidst  the  miraculous  narratives, 
without  danger  and  with  real  profit. 


The  Needs  of  Adolescence 

The  needs  of  the  modern  child,  therefore,  in  order 
that  he  may  be  prepared  to  meet  the  inevitable  criticism 
of  the  miraculous  narratives  may  be  summed  up  as 
follows  : 

1.  He  needs  to  be  shown  the  comparative  unimport- 
ance of  these  narratives  in  relation  to  the  meaning  and 
value  of  the  Gospel,  Christ  and  the  Bible. 

2.  He  needs  to  realize  that  the  modern  view  of  the 
world  and  the  universality  of  unbreakable  laws  give  more 
rather  than  less  room  for  Christian  faith. 

3.  He  needs  to  understand  something  of  the  way  in 
which  miraculous  narratives  became  connected  with  the 
personality  of  Jesus  as  well  as  the  meaning  and  value  which 
they  have  whether  they  contain  accurate  history  or  not. 

To  supply  these  needs  will  certainly  require  systematic 
teaching  with  regard  to  miracles  at  some  period,  and  it 
cannot  be  postponed  to  adult  age.  The  boy  enters  the 
'  storm  and  stress '  period  of  adolescence  generally 
before  he  is  sixteen  years  of  age,  and  it  is  then  that  he 
needs  all  the  help  that  we  can  give  him  to  meet  his  in- 
evitable doubts  and  perplexities. 

We  have  already  seen  that  this  kind  of  systematic 
work  is  neither  necessary  nor  possible,  as  a  rule,  during 
the  period  of  childhood.  At  that  time  the  best  that  we 
can  do  is  to  formulate  our  teaching  in  such  a  way  as 
indirectly  and  unconsciously  to  wean  the  mind  gradually 
and  healthily  from  its  natural  and  naive  credulity.  Early 
adolescence  then — somewhere  between  the  ages  of  twelve 
and  sixteen — is  the  one  and  natural  opportunity  for 
undertaking  such  a  task. 

The  method  adopted  for  this  purpose  will  probably 
vary  with  the  different  types  of  teachers,  and  with  the 
changing  circumstances,  but  perhaps  the  following  sug- 
gestions for  a  course  of  lessons  may  help  the  reader  to 
work  out  his  own  plan  : 


THE  PROBLEM  OF  THE  MIRACLES  201 

1 .  Some  of  the  simpler  prophetic  narratives  might  be 
studied — for  instance,  some  parts  of  the  Book  of  Jeremiah. 
This  would  be  done  with  a  view  to  analysing  to  some 
extent  such  prophetic  phrases  as  '  God  saith,' '  God  did,' 
into  their  psychological  and  historical  elements.  They 
include  all  the  natural  causes  and  show  the  religious  form 
in  which  the  Bible  describes  what  we  would  express  by 
saying  '  conscience  '  or  '  insight  '  or  '  thought,'  etc.  One 
might  compare  the  Biblical  report  of  an  event  with 
one  of  Cromwell's  reports  to  Parliament,  put  one  into  the 
form  of  the  other  and  show  that  Cromwell  had  as  real  a 
sense  of  God's  guidance  as  the  Biblical  writer. 

How   THEY    CAN    BE    MeT 

In  this  way  it  can  be  shown  how  the  Bible  passes  over 
all  the  secondary  causes,  the  human  instruments  and  acts, 
the  natural  events  and  turns  its  thoughts  directly  to  the 
divine  cause,  including  everything  under  God. 

2.  A  simple  sketch  might  be  given  of  the  origin  of  the 
Gospels — not  from  a  literary  point  of  view,  but  in  order 
to  show  the  history  of  the  material.  It  would  start  with 
the  popular  stories  told  about  the  Master  during  His  life- 
time, the  memories  of  the  disciples  and  their  preaching 
of  Jesus — these  passing  from  mouth  to  mouth  and  sharing 
the  fate  of  all  oral  traditions,  taking  different  forms — 
sometimes  twisted,  sometimes  exaggerated.  The  say- 
ings would  be  translated  from  Aramaic  into  Greek,  and 
some  of  them  written  down  early  for  purposes  of 
instruction. 

Part  of  this  account  would  be  occupied  with  explain- 
ing the  rise  of  unhistorical  narratives,  owing  to  mis- 
understandings, imperfect  memories,  influence  of  the 
belief  in  the  Messiah  and  the  extraordinary  impression 
made  by  the  personality  of  Jesus.  The  rise  of  such 
marvellous  stories  so  early  might  be  compared  with  what 
happened  in  the  case  of  St.  Bernard  or  St.  Francis.  It 
should  always  be  made  perfectly  plain  that  such  stories 
were  not  deceptions  or  inventions,  but  the  natural  result 
of  the  greatness  of  Jesus,  the  desire  to  do  Him  honour  and 
the  credulity  of  the  age.     They  are  stories  of  what  He 


202    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

might  have  done,  being  what  He  was,  gradually  turning 
into  stories  of  what  He  did. 

3.  Then,  in  reading  the  Gospels,  care  should  be  taken 
in  discussing  each  miraculous  narrative  to  show  the  moral 
and  religious  ideas  which  it  expresses,  while  noting  frankly 
the  possibility  or  probability  of  its  not  being  an  historical 
event. 

4.  Every  opportunity  should  also  be  taken  to  note 
the  difference  between  the  ancient  view  of  the  world  and 
the  modern  one.  The  idea  of  possession  by  demons  as  the 
ancient  account  of  disease  is  a  good  illustration. 

5.  Most  of  all,  at  this  time  such  a  positive  sketch  of 
the  Christian  Gospel  should  be  given  as  will  naturally  fix 
the  impression  on  the  mind  that  in  essence  its  nature  is 
moral  and  religious,  and  that  the  truth  of  its  moral  and 
religious  content  is  for  us  independent  of  its  alleged 
miraculous  accompaniments. 

For  Books  see  Chapter  XI. 


CHAPTER  XI 

THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS 

The  Birth-Stories  in  Christian  Instruction. — Christmas  and  Easter 
— The  Meaning  and  Power  of  Christmas — The  Character  of  the 
Biblical  Narratives — The  Birth-Stories  in  Early  Childhood — 
How  to  deal  with  them  —  As  an  Introduction  to  the  Life  of 
Christ. 

The  Birth  -  Stories  in  Adolescence. — The  Educational  Opportunity 
of  Christmas — The  Religious  Value  of  the  Birth-Stories — The 
Religious  Value  and  the  Physical  Miracle. 

The  Easter  Faith. — The  Easter  Message  and  the  Easter  Faith — The 
Growth  of  the  Easter  Faith — The  Experiences  of  the  Disciples 
— Between  Calvary  and  Pentecost  —  The  Story  of  a  Great 
Spiritual  Struggle, 

The  Easter  Message. — The  Story  of  the  Empty  Grave — The  Develop- 
ment of  the  Story — In  the  Synoptic  Gospels  and  in  the  Gospel 
of  Peter — The  Permanent  Faith. 

The  Ascension  in  Christian  Instruction. — The  Story  in  the  New 
Testament — Its  Value  for  Religion  and  in  Modern  Instruction. 


THE  BIRTH-STORIES  IN  CHRISTIAN 
INSTRUCTION 

Christmas  and  Easter 

Most  of  the  Protestant  denominations  of  this  country- 
have  almost  entirely  lost  touch  with  the  Church  Calendar. 
From  the  point  of  view  of  religious  education  that  is  by 
no  means  all  to  the  good,  and  it  may  yet  be  useful  to 
revive  some  of  the  historical  Church  Festivals  as  the  most 
effective  points  of  contact  for  some  of  the  most  important 
elements  in  Christian  Instruction.  The  only  festivals 
that  still  keep  their  hold  upon  the  minds  of  the  people 
are  Christmas  and  Easter,  and  that  not  because  of  their 

303 


204    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Christian  significance  so  much  as  because  they  fall  at 
natural  turning-points  of  the  year  and  have  become  parts 
of  our  general  life.  In  connection  with  them,  however, 
religious  and  Christian  ideas  can  still  be  easily  awakened 
and  points  of  contact  can  still  be  found  in  them  for  the 
growth  of  Christian  faith  and  character.  Educationally, 
therefore,  they  still  provide  an  opportunity  that  ought 
not  to  be  missed.  Christianity  is  essentially  an  historical 
religion,  and  these  two  festivals  are  bound  up  with  the 
historical  personality  of  Jesus,  out  of  which  that  religion 
grew.  The  mere  existence  of  Christmas  and  Easter  in 
our  year  does  undoubtedly  of  itself  serve  some  of  the  ends 
of  Christian  education.  Men  and  women  are  still  moved 
by  them  more  or  less  consciously  in  a  Christian  direction. 
The  work  of  the  teacher  is  to  make  that  movement  more 
deliberate  and  more  definite.  How  can  we  then  *  keep 
the  feast  '  at  the  present  time  most  effectively  for 
Christian  instruction  ?  How  can  we  make  the  best  use 
of  these  festivals  and  what  they  represent  in  Christianity 
deliberately  for  Christian  purposes  ?  The  problem  is  not 
an  easy  one  to  solve  in  these  days,  when  the  very  facts 
which  these  festivals  are  generally  supposed  to  celebrate 
have  become  doubtful  for  so  many,  inside  as  well  as  out- 
side the  Church.  Here  we  are  only  concerned  with  the 
problem  in  so  far  as  it  involves  the  use  and  value  of  the 
narratives  of  Birth,  Resurrection  and  Ascension  in  the 
New  Testament.  What  is  the  value  of  these  narratives 
for  the  growth  of  Christian  faith,  knowledge  and  character  ? 
When  and  how  can  they  still  be  used  ? 

It  is  probably  the  case  that  the  first  religious  impres- 
sions of  most  of  us  are  due  to  some  Christmas  story  or 
other  heard  through  the  firelight  of  some  of  the  dark 
evenings  before  Christmas.  Everything  is  in  the  teacher's 
favour  at  such  a  time.  He  finds  his  pupils  in  their  most 
receptive  mood.  At  such  a  time  we  get  nearest  to  what 
may  be  called  a  natural  and  effective  education — when  an 
event  like  the  Christmas  Festival  inevitably  calls  forth 
its  own  inevitable  tale.  The  spirit  of  the  season  grips  the 
imagination  of  the  world.  It  has  not  only  a  long  Christian 
ancestry,  but  it  has  grown  up,  as  it  were,  with  the  human 
race  itself.     It  is  pre-eminently  the  season  of  childhood 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      205 

and  the  flowering  time  of  the  imagination — the  carnival 
of  bright  illusion.  At  present,  it  is  the  only  time  in  the 
year  when  the  child  by  right  divine  can  claim  to  live 
in  his  own  natural  wonderland  —  peopled  by  Father 
Christmas  and  Santa  Claus,  by  elves  and  sprites,  by 
angels  and  the  Christ-child. 

The  Meaning  and  Power  of  Christmas 

One  of  the  dangers  of  modern  times  is  to  pluck  the 
child  out  of  that  world  too  soon.  The  modern  child  is 
in  danger  of  growing  old  and  wise  too  early.  One  of  the 
things  we  have  to  learn  in  moral  and  religious  education 
is  how  to  feed  the  imagination  properly  and  effectively. 
For  the  years  of  childhood  it  is  there  that  both  morality 
and  religion  are  making  a  home  for  themselves.  The 
older  religious  education  never  cultivated  the  imagination 
and  the  sense  of  wonder  because  its  angels  were  too 
crassly  matter  of  fact,  and  its  miracles  were  not  numerous 
and  wonderful  enough.  On  the  other  hand,  the  modern 
theological  movement  is  in  danger  of  making  its  keen 
sense  of  historical  truthfulness  for  adults  into  a  barren 
literalism  for  children,  of  stunting  the  best  powers  of 
childhood  and  of  disparaging  the  educational  value  of 
imagination.  This  does  not  mean  that  we  must  or  shall 
tell  the  same  stories  in  the  same  way  as  our  fathers  and 
mothers  did,  but  it  does  mean  that  we  must  never  let 
the  opportunity  of  Christmas  pass  us  by — ^whether  in 
school  or  at  home — ^without  going  through  its  open  door 
into  the  wonderland  beyond  with  the  child's  hand  in 
our  own.  And  in  order  to  make  the  best  use  of  the 
opportunity  we  must  be  very  clear  as  to  the  end  we  have 
in  view,  the  educational  value  of  our  material  for  that 
purpose  and  the  most  effective  way  of  using  it. 

Can  we  still  use  the  Christmas  stories  of  the  New 
Testament  in  our  religious  instruction,  knowing  what  we 
do  about  their  origin  and  history  ?  And  if  we  can,  how 
many  of  them,  when  and  in  what  form  ? 

It  is  indeed  true  that  very  little  room  for  doubt  has 
been  left  us  with  regard  to  the  real  nature  of  these  stories. 
They   are   almost   all   and   almost   entirely   legendary   in 


2o6    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

character  and  an  expression  of  faith  in  Jesus  more  than 
records  of  historical  facts.  There  is  no  more  evidence 
for  their  historical  accuracy  than  there  is  for  the  many 
other  similar  tales  told  of  other  heroes  in  the  history  of 
religion  and  thought.  Whatever  use  we  make  of  them, 
it  must  be  with  our  eyes  open  to  their  twofold  character. 

In  the  first  place,  they  are  variations  and  survivals 
in  Christianity  of  the  primitive  wonderland  of  religion, 
going  back  finally,  perhaps,  to  ancient  nature-myths  of 
man's  childhood.  Secondly,  in  the  New  Testament  they 
have  been  purified  and  used  as  attempts  to  express  the 
value  of  Jesus  Christ  to  the  Early  Church — coming  to  the 
Christians  probably  from  the  Messianic  beliefs  of  Judaism 
and  the  Greek  stories  of  the  Sons  of  God. 

Character  of  the  Narratives  of  Childhood  and 

Birth 

It  is  impossible  here  to  enter  upon  any  detailed  dis- 
cussion of  the  various  literary  and  historical  questions 
connected  with  these  well-known  stories.  The  situation 
seems  to  be  that  the  first  generation  of  Christians  had 
but  little  interest  in  the  parentage  and  birthplace  of 
Jesus,  and  there  is  but  little  evidence  of  their  thinking 
that  there  was  anything  extraordinary  about  these  things. 
Their  minds  were  fully  occupied  with  their  intense  belief 
in  Him  as  the  promised  Messiah  and  His  divine  value 
for  their  lives.  They  made  many  attempts  to  explain 
why  and  how  He  could  have  this  divine  value  as  their 
Saviour.  "  He  was  the  Man  from  Heaven,"  says  Paul  ; 
"  He  was  the  Incarnate  Word  of  God,"  says  John  ;  "  He 
received  the  Holy  Ghost  at  baptism,"  says  Mark  ;  "  His 
glory  was  not  fully  revealed  till  the  Resurrection,"  says 
Peter.  These  are  some  of  their  main  ways  of  expressing 
the  divine  impression  made  upon  them  by  Jesus.  As 
time  went  on,  however,  and  they  became  more  fully 
familiar  with  Greek  ideas  and  stories  of  '  the  Sons  of 
God  '  and  with  Messianic  predictions  and  theories,  many 
of  them  also  threw  the  expression  of  their  faith  in  Jesus 
into  the  form  of  Birth-stories  suggested  by  pagan  and 
Old  Testament  legends,  purified   and  moulded  for  their 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      207 

purpose.  These  finally  culminated  in  the  story  of  the 
miraculous  birth — thus  tracing  back  His  divine  power  as 
Saviour  to  the  Incarnation  itself  and  not  only  to  the 
Resurrection,  Transfiguration  and  Baptism.  There  are, 
of  course,  several  different  cycles  of  Birth-stories  in  the 
Gospels,  and  as  the  poetry  of  faith  they  are  almost  magical 
in  their  effect.  As  such  no  purer  or  sublimer  tribute 
could  be  paid  to  the  power  and  majesty  of  Jesus.  In 
no  place  in  the  New  Testament  are  we  made  to  see  more 
clearly  what  Jesus  must  have  meant  to  the  Early  Church. 
All  literary  and  historical  criticism  becomes  very 
secondary  when  once  we  read  these  stories  as  first  of  all 
and  most  of  all  pictures  reflecting  the  faith  and  experience 
of  the  early  Christians.  The  value  of  this  material  for 
the  teacher  is  that  it  enables  him  to  impress  this  moral 
and  religious  value  more  deeply  than  ever  upon  the  mind. 
With  regard  to  the  educational  use  to  be  made  of  the 
Birth-stories  it  is  hoped  that  the  previous  discussions 
of  the  miraculous  and  legendary  narratives  of  the  Gospels 
has  already  prepared  the  mind  of  the  reader  for  what 
needs  to  be  said. 

The  Birth-Stories  in  Early  Childhood 

Useful  and  valuable  as  the  stories  of  the  Birth  and 
Childhood  may  be  at  other  times,  there  can  be  little  doubt 
that  their  real  and  peculiar  place  in  religious  instruction 
is  to  be  found  at  the  point  where  the  child  is  beginning 
to  leave  infancy  for  childhood,  where  he  is  beginning  to 
pass  from  the  world  of  pure  imagination  to  that  of  history. 
That  means  somewhere  between  his  sixth  and  eighth  year. 

It  would  seem  that  the  natural  course  of  religious 
instruction  up  to  the  age  of  about  eight  years  should 
run  somewhat  as  follows  : 

During  the  earliest  years  of  teaching,  the  idea  of  God 
can  be  present  to  the  mind  of  the  child  only  as  human. 
So,  while  in  answer  to  the  child's  questions  about  the 
moon  and  the  stars,  the  storm  and  the  wind,  we  speak 
naturally  of  God  as  making  them  ;  yet  in  the  first  more 
or  less  incidental  teaching  of  rehgion,  God  must  remain 
very  much  in  the  background  and  His  elementary  moral 


2o8    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

qualities  attributed  to  a  figure  nearer  to  the  child's 
experience.  Christian  tradition  and  legend  have  already- 
provided  us  with  just  such  a  figure  in  the  Christ-child. 
The  needs  of  the  child  can,  therefore,  best  be  met  at  this 
time  by  Nature  and  Wonder-stories  in  which  the  Christ- 
child  plays  the  divine  part  of  protector,  friend,  helper, 
comforter  and  adviser.  These  Christ-child  stories  in  their 
form  and  content  should  be  somewhat  similar  to  fairy-tales 
with  elementary  moral  motives  behind  them  and  in  them. 
In  any  case,  whatever  may  be  the  kind  of  instruction 
given  in  these  earliest  years,  there  comes  a  time  when 
the  child  is  ripe  for  a  gradual  weaning  from  Wonderland 
into  History,  and  from  the  idea  of  the  Christ-child  into 
something  nearer  the  Heavenly  Father.  In  instruction 
this  represents  the  need  for  a  connecting  link  between 
the  religious  fairy-tale  and  the  historical  life  of  Christ 
which  is  to  follow.  For  this  purpose  nothing  better  has 
yet  been  discovered  than  a  series  of  the  half-historical, 
half-legendary  Wonder-tales  of  the  Bible.  The  series 
would  begin  with  the  Christmas  stories  of  the  New 
Testament,  in  which  the  figure  of  the  Christ-child  appears 
as  the  gift  of  the  Father.  It  would  continue  with  such 
stories  as  those  of  Elijah,  Creation,  the  Patriarchs  from 
the  Old  Testament  and  such  Wonder-tales  of  Jesus  as 
the  Stilling  of  the  Storm,  Feeding  the  Thousands,  stories 
of  Healing,  and  finish  up  with  tales  of  the  more  historical 
heroes,  such  as  Moses,  David  and  some  of  the  Prophets — 
becoming  less  and  less  marvellous  and  legendary,  while 
more  and  more  historical  and  moral. 

How   TO   DEAL   WITH   THEM 

Every  one  of  these  must,  of  course,  be  told  by  the 
teacher  in  the  spirit  of  the  child.  He  must,  for  the  time 
being,  forget  the  difference  between  the  world  of  external 
fact  and  that  of  the  imagination.  For  the  child  they  are 
both  one.  He  has  no  conception  either  of  natural  law  or 
of  historical  truth. 

This,  then,  seems  to  be  the  proper  place  and  value  of 
the  Christmas  stories — at  the  transition  time  from  infancy 
to  childhood — from  the  period  of  religious  fairy-tales  to 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      209 

that  of  religious  history.  They  are  the  educational 
connecting  link  between  the  two — preceded  by  general 
Nature-tales  of  the  Christ-child,  who  is  the  substitute  for 
God,  and  followed  by  heroic  stories  of  men  who  were  the 
instruments  of  God. 

This  is  their  real  home  so  long  as  the  teacher  can 
forget  all  his  negative  criticism  of  them  and  enter  into  the 
wonderland  of  the  child .  To  do  anything  else  is  to  sacrifice 
the  welfare  of  the  child  to  the  exclusive  point  of  view  of  the 
adult.  Many  are  afraid,  even  at  this  age,  of  the  question 
turning  up — is  this  really  true  ?  If  it  does,  however, 
what  it  usually  means  at  this  age  is  a  pathetic  request  for 
more  certainty  and  not  for  more  doubt.  In  nine  cases 
out  of  ten  there  need  not  be  much  hesitation  in  saying, 
"  Yes,  of  course,  it  is  true." 

As  AN  Introduction  to  the  Life  of  Christ 

So  far  as  their  form  is  concerned,  the  Christmas 
stories  should  be  told  fully  and  almost  recklessly  at  this 
age  so  far  as  the  use  of  a  trained  imagination  is  concerned. 
Not  that  the  Biblical  narratives  can  be  improved  upon  so 
far  as  they  go,  but  their  language  is  sometimes  above  the 
understanding  of  a  child  of  six ;  they  leave  many  things 
unsaid  which  must  be  supplied  for  the  child,  and  they 
consist  of  several  cycles  of  stories  which  are  inconsistent 
with  one  another.  Certain  omissions  are  also  necessary, 
especially  so  far  as  the  physical  miracle  is  concerned  and 
the  relations  between  Joseph  and  Mary.  With  these 
modifications  the  whole  material  of  Matt.  i.  19-ii.  23 
and  Luke  i.  5-ii.  40  may  be  used  for  Christmas  stories. 
This  material  cannot,  without  doing  violence  to  it,  be 
reduced  to  one  consistent  whole  which  can  be  narrated 
consecutively.  Several  cycles  of  stories  can  be  made 
out  of  it.  To  discuss  in  detail  the  form  and  content  of 
these  cycles  of  stories  would  take  us  too  far  afield.  The 
main  point,  however,  is  that  the  teacher  should  be  able 
to  enter  fully  and  freely  without  any  qualms  of  conscience 
into  the  wonderland  of  the  child  and  put  his  informed  and 
trained  imagination  to  work  so  as  to  make  each  incident 
as  full  of  action,  mystery  and  detail  as  possible. 
14 


210    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

For  late  childhood  also  (9-12)  the  value  of  the  Birth- 
stories  will  be  somewhat  similar.  As  we  have  already- 
seen,  some  historical  account  must  be  given  at  this  period 
of  the  life  and  work  of  Jesus  as  a  whole.  These  stories 
cannot  any  longer  remain  as  integral  parts  of  that  account. 
The  distinction  between  what  is  '  true  '  and  what  is  not 
'  true  '  is  already  sufficiently  realized  at  this  age  to  make 
it  necessary  for  the  teacher  to  mark  the  difference  in  some 
way.  So  far  as  one  can  see,  the  best  way  out  of  the 
difficulty  is  to  interpolate  these  stories  in  a  general  intro- 
duction to  the  life  of  Jesus,  and  to  use  some  non-committal 
formula  when  telling  them.  This  method  will  serve  the 
twofold  purpose  of  distinguishing  them  from  the  main 
historical  narrative,  and  also  of  helping  to  create  the  proper 
religious  atmosphere  for  the  life  which  is  to  follow.^ 


THE  BIRTH-STORIES  IN  ADOLESCENCE 

With  regard  to  the  stories  of  Birth  and  Childhood  in 
the  religious  education  of  youth  and  adults,  very  little 
need  be  added.  There  are  probably  two  or  three  occa- 
sions on  which  the  teacher  will  be  brought  face  to  face 
with  the  task  of  dealing  with  them — at  the  celebration 
of  Christmas  and  in  any  study  of  the  Gospels,  or  in  any 
consideration  of  the  typical  modern  difficulties  with 
regard  to  the  Bible  and  Christianity. 

The  Educational  Opportunity  of  Christmas 

For  adolescents  the  Christmas  season  should  become 
something  more  than  a  festival  of  the  Birth  of  Christ.  It 
may  fittingly  be  used  to  celebrate  the  birth  of  Christianity 
as  a  whole.  The  Christmas  gift  is  the  whole  personality 
of  Jesus,  His  life  and  death,  His  teaching,  work  and 
character.  It  is  the  best  opportunity  of  the  year  to  im- 
press upon  the  mind  the  central  place  of  Jesus  Christ  in 
the  Christian  Religion,  and  to  discuss  the  essential  meaning 
of  Christianity.     This  is  a  subject  which,  of  course,  goes 

^  See  Chap.  VII.  passim. 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      211 

to  the  root  of  most  of  our  religious  and  theological  troubles. 
The  solution  of  almost  every  other  problem  in  the  thought 
of  modern  days  depends  upon  the  answer  which  will  be 
given  to  the  critical  question  :  What  is  Christianity  ?  In 
the  teaching  of  adolescents  almost  everything  depends 
upon  the  view  of  the  essential  nature  of  Christianity  which 
is  placed  before  them.  This,  of  course,  is  not  the  place  to 
discuss  that  subject,  but  only  for  reminding  the  reader  that 
the  Christmas  festival  in  many  ways  affords  the  best 
natural  opportunity  for  definitely  facing  it. 

In  this  wider  interpretation  of  the  educational  oppor- 
tunity of  the  Christmas  festival,  the  New  Testament 
stories  of  the  Birth  of  Christ  will  take  only  a  subordinate 
part.  On  almost  all  hands  the  subject  of  the  Virgin 
Birth  has  ceased  to  count  as  a  factor  in  the  religious 
situation,  though  it  may  still  be  clung  to  by  many  as  an 
article  of  belief,  and  though  a  frank  discussion  of  it  may  be 
useful  for  clarifying  ideas  with  regard  to  the  essential 
nature  of  Christianity.  Most  scholars  have  also  long 
ago  come  to  the  conclusion  that  historically  we  know 
practically  nothing  of  the  early  life  of  Jesus,  and  that  all 
the  narratives  pertaining  to  them  are  of  legendary  growth. 
That,  however,  does  not  mean  that  they  cannot  be  used 
in  a  subordinate  place  for  the  purpose  of  making  clear  the 
central  place  and  value  of  the  Person  of  Christ. 

Whenever  and  wherever  the  Christian  teacher  is  called 
upon  to  deal  with  this  subject  and  the  stories  connected 
with  it  in  the  New  Testament — ^whether  at  Christmas  or 
in  critical  discussions — it  must  be  naturally  with  some 
positive  and  constructive  end  in  view.  He  will  certainly 
have  to  pass  many  negative  and  destructive  verdicts  on 
the  proper  occasions,  but  these  he  will  only  use  to  reach 
some  higher  end.  It  is  also  perfectly  plain  that  the  end 
he  has  in  view  must  be  a  moral  and  religious  one — to 
strengthen  Christian  conviction  and  to  promote  deeper 
and  more  intelligent  Christian  life.  Every  book  in  the 
New  Testament  was,  of  course,  written  directly  for  the 
same  purpose,  and  when  he  desires  to  get  the  best  and  the 
whole  Christian  value  out  of  these  Birth-stories,  he  is 
trying  to  achieve  the  very  purpose  for  which  they  were 
originally  written. 


212    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  Religious  Value  of  the  Birth-Stories 

The  first  question,  therefore,  to  which  the  teacher 
must  address  himself  is  the  reHgious  value  of  the  stories, 
and  he  must  distinguish  that  from  the  physical  miracle 
and  the  historical  accuracy  of  the  narratives.  That 
religious  value  may  be  generally  expressed  by  saying 
that  whether  the  story  of  the  Virgin  Birth  and  the  legends 
connected  therewith  have  any  direct  historical  value  or 
not,  there  could  be  no  more  convincing  proof  of  the 
tremendous  impression  made  by  the  personality  of  Jesus 
upon  the  early  disciples,  and  of  their  faith  that  He  was 
divine  in  some  sense  than  the  circulation  of  these  stories 
of  His  origin.  It  is  not  meant  that  that  covers  the  whole 
of  the  religious  value  of  the  Birth-stories,  but  it  touches 
the  main  point.  Their  value  is  increased  rather  than 
lessened  when  we  take  these  stories  to  be  not  accounts 
of  historical  facts,  but  legendary  growths.  When  they 
are  looked  at  as  variations  and  survivals  of  the  primitive 
wonderland  of  religion,  perhaps  even  bearing  traces  of 
the  ancient  Nature-myths  of  man's  childhood  ;  when  we 
remember  that  they  must  have  come  to  the  Christians 
through  the  Messianic  beliefs  of  Judaism  combined  with 
the  Greek  mythology  of  the  Sons  of  God,  the  fact  that 
they  were  adopted,  purified  and  adapted  by  the  Church 
becomes  an  astounding  proof  of  the  unique  significance 
of  Jesus  for  His  early  disciples.  It  is  from  this  point  of 
view  that  they  retain  their  value  for  the  Christian  preacher 
and  the  teacher  of  the  senior  classes  in  the  Sunday  School. 

Its  Relation  to  the  Physical  Miracle 

When  he  has  thus  put  his  pupils  into  the  right  religious 
attitude  towards  the  Birth-stories,  the  teacher  can  then 
try  to  show  how  this  religious  faith  in  the  divine  value 
of  Jesus  is  connected  now  and  was  connected  in  the  minds 
of  the  Early  Church  with  the  physical  miracle.  He  can 
easily  show  that  at  no  time  was  there  any  essential  con- 
nection for  the  Early  Church  in  general  between  the  two 
things.  The  mere  silence  of  every  part  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment, with  the  exception  of  the  first  chapters  of  Matthew 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS     213 

and  Luke,  is  itself  enough  to  show  that  much.  And  even 
in  these  chapters  themselves  there  is  not  a  word  to  show 
that  the  authors  laid  any  fundamental  stress  upon  the 
physical  manner  of  the  Birth.  The  most  that  can  be  said 
is  that  the  circle  of  disciples  from  which  these  chapters 
come  did  find  in  the  story  one  expression  of  their  sense 
of  the  supreme  value  of  Jesus.  There  is  absolutely  no 
reason  to  think  that  faith,  even  for  them,  in  any  way 
depended  upon  the  miraculous  origin.  Throughout  the 
whole  of  the  New  Testament  no  appeal  is  ever  made  to 
the  Virgin  Birth  as  a  reason  for  believing  in  Jesus  as  the 
Son  of  God,  neither  by  Jesus  Himself  nor  by  His  disciples. 
This  separation  of  the  religious  value  of  Christ  from  the 
physical  miracle  may  be  further  illustrated  by  pointing 
to  the  fact  that  whatever  may  have  been  true  of  the  Early 
Church,  in  these  days  the  call  for  belief  in  a  miraculous 
birth  is  more  often  than  not  simply  a  hindrance  to  faith 
in  Jesus.  In  very  many  cases  it  weakens,  and  sometimes 
it  may  destroy,  the  appeal  that  comes  from  what  Jesus 
said,  did  and  was  in  Himself. 

It  is  upon  the  background  of  some  such  discussions 
as  these  that  the  teacher  can  prepare  the  minds  of  his 
pupils  for  a  free  and  frank  discussion  of  the  literary  and 
historical  questions  connected  with  these  stories,  which 
probably  must  have  its  place  sometime  in  adolescence. 
The  importance  of  these  questions  must  not,  however,  be 
exaggerated,  for  once  the  Virgin  Birth  ceases  to  be  an 
essential  article  of  Christian  faith  and  belief,  the  details 
of  the  literary  and  historical  criticism  cease  also  to  be 
of  supreme  significance  for  the  ordinary  Christian  disciple. 

Once  the  stories  themselves  have  been  used  in  different 
ways  and  at  different  times  to  bring  the  growing  soul 
face  to  face  with  Jesus  Himself  and  His  religious  value, 
both  Criticism  and  Education  have  done  their  work. 


3 

THE  EASTER  FAITH 

The  Resurrection  of  Jesus  and  the  narratives  connected 
therewith  are  far  more  closely  interwoven  with  the  litera- 


214    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

ture  and  history  of  the  New  Testament  than  His  Birth. 
The  whole  subject  is  also  much  nearer  the  heart  of  the 
Christian  Gospel.  Belief  in  the  Resurrection  of  Jesus 
was  in  some  sense  essential  to  the  New  Testament  belief 
in  the  future  life  generally,  and  in  some  ways  it  is  so  still. 
It  is,  therefore,  a  much  more  complicated  and  necessary 
task  to  give  these  narratives  their  proper  place  in  the 
teaching  of  the  New  Testament  and  in  religious  instruc- 
tion as  a  whole.  It  is,  however,  an  element  of  religious 
faith  which  belongs  rather  to  the  verge  of  maturity  than 
to  childhood's  days.  At  any  rate,  it  presupposes  a  fairly 
clear  appreciation  of  the  moral  and  religious  value  of  the 
personality  of  Jesus,  which  seems  impossible  before 
adolescence. 

The  first  condition  of  any  fruitful  dealing  with  the 
problem  is  to  realize  the  distinction  between  the  Easter 
Message  of  the  empty  grave,  including  the  appearances 
to  the  disciples  and  the  Easter  Faith  in  the  victory  of  the 
Crucified  over  death  and  His  continued  personal  life  with 
the  Father. 

Our  real  difficulties  begin  when  we  are  face  to  face 
with  the  historical  and  distinctively  Christian  associations 
of  Easter,  with  the  Resurrection  of  Jesus  and  life  beyond 
the  grave.  The  modern  study  of  history,  theology  and 
education  forbids  our  continuing  simply  to  retail  the 
Biblical  narratives  in  their  Biblical  form  without  some 
criticism  of  their  nature  and  value.  It  is  quite  as  im- 
possible either  to  pass  them  by  or  to  give  them  simply  as 
merely  popular  legends.  We  know  that  it  is  not  good 
teaching  to  force  critical  considerations  upon  the  children. 
Our  lessons  must  be  based  upon  modern  criticism  certainly  ; 
but,  as  a  rule,  it  is  only  positive  views  and  descriptions  that 
we  ought  to  present  to  those  who  are  under  the  adolescent 
age.  The  critical  considerations  upon  which  those  views 
and  descriptions  are  based  should  be  left  for  later  study. 

The  Growth  of  the  Easter  Faith 

It  is  certainly  an  important  part  of  the  work  of  the 
Christian  teacher  to  transmit  a  knowledge  of  the  Bible 
and  its  contents  as  well  as  the  meaning  and  history  of 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      215 

Christianity.  Both  these,  however,  must  be  subordinate 
to  the  growth  of  Christian  faith  and  the  formation  of 
Christian  character.  In  the  end  every  part  of  the  curri- 
culum must  be  judged  by  the  contribution  it  makes  to  the 
growth  of  the  Christian  hfe.  Fundamentally,  therefore, 
what  we  are  concerned  with  here  is  not  the  historical 
value  of  the  Resurrection,  nor  its  place  in  a  theological 
system,  but  how  it  can  help  to  build  up  Christian  characters 
to-day. 

There  are  many  who  assert  emphatically  that  a  direct 
communion  with  the  Risen  Christ  is  part  of  their  own 
personal  experience.  Such  communion,  however,  must  in 
any  case  belong  to  a  more  or  less  mature  Christian  faith, 
and  be  very  personal  in  its  nature.  Moreover,  it  is  im- 
possible to  think  of  it  as  a  force  independent  of  an 
impression  already  made  by  the  personality  of  Jesus  as 
revealed  in  His  earthly  life.  We  cannot  hope  to  produce 
such  experiences  in  others  as  a  direct  power  for  the  growth 
of  a  Christian  life.  Repeated  as  well-authenticated  his- 
tory, however,  they  may  help  others  to  feel  the  force  of 
the  impression  made  by  Jesus,  and  thus  be  of  primary 
educative  value  in  a  Christian  direction.  It  is,  therefore, 
from  this  point  of  view  that  the  Resurrection  narratives 
of  the  New  Testament  must  be  judged,  and  it  is  for  this 
purpose  they  ought  to  be  used  in  religious  instruction — 
in  so  far  as  they  incorporate  the  genuine  historical  ex- 
periences of  the  first  disciples.  That  is  also  why  the 
teacher  must  come  to  some  conclusion  as  to  how  much 
history  is  contained  in  these  narratives.  His  great  need 
is  to  try  to  realize  for  himself  the  actual  experiences 
through  which  the  disciples  went  after  the  death  of  Jesus, 
and  then  give  to  his  pupils  some  positive  and  concrete 
picture  of  that  experience. 

The  Experiences  of  the  Disciples 

The  main  features  in  the  narratives  that  are  recognized 
as  historical  by  modern  scholars  are  easily  described. 
The  Crucifixion  had  for  the  moment  shattered  the  grow- 
ing conviction  of  the  disciples  that  their  Master  was  the 
Messiah  of  God  come  to  estabUsh  the  Kingdom.     In^^^their 


2i6    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

despair  they  fled  to  Galilee  sick  and  sore  at  heart.  Before 
many  weeks  were  over  we  find  them  back  again  in 
Jerusalem,  with  their  faith  restored  and  openly  pro- 
claiming Jesus  as  the  Risen  Christ.  They  were  now 
convinced  that  the  Cross  was  not  the  defeat  of  Jesus,  but 
ordained  of  God  for  His  greater  triumph.  How  their 
faith  was  renewed  between  Calvary  and  Pentecost  we 
cannot  now  describe  with  any  great  confidence.  It  is 
difficult  to  pick  out  the  historical  facts  underneath  the 
stories  of  the  Resurrection — whether  the  grave  was  found 
empty  ;  how,  when  and  by  whom  the  Lord  was  first 
seen.  A  close  study  of  the  narratives  themselves  reveals 
the  fact  that  it  is  impossible  to  obtain  any  clear  and 
consistent  picture  of  the  external  events.  The  most  that 
we  have  any  historical  right  to  say  is,  that  the  change 
from  despair  to  faith  was  accompanied  by  a  series  of 
appearances  of  the  Risen  Lord  to  some  of  the  disciples. 
Most  probably,  also,  Peter  was  one  of  the  first  and  fore- 
most to  experience  this  recovery  and  be  instrumental 
in  spreading  it,  and  probably  the  change  took  place  in 
Galilee. 

It  is,  of  course,  impossible  and  undesirable  to  eliminate 
the  mystery  and  the  sense  of  miracle  from  this  progress 
of  the  disciples  out  of  deep  despair  to  the  recovery  of 
faith.  Upon  any  view  of  the  narratives,  it  will  always  be 
a  very  difficult  task  to  describe  the  psychological  process 
that  is  involved.  In  spite  of  its  difficulty,  however,  it  is 
certainly  the  main  business  of  the  teacher  to  attempt 
some  positive  description  that  will  produce  a  sense 
of  reality,  and  also  some  sense  of  the  moral  struggle 
through  which  the  disciples  fought  their  way  to 
victory. 

The  question  is,  how  can  such  a  consistent  and  con- 
crete picture  of  the  experience  of  the  disciples  be  con- 
structed out  of  the  materials  at  our  disposal  in  the  New 
Testament  ?  Many  attempts  have  been  made  to  provide 
the  teacher  with  such  a  narrative,  which  must  naturally 
be  consistent  alike  with  the  spirit  of  the  New  Testament 
and  with  the  results  of  modern  criticism.  The  following 
tentative  suggestions  more  or  less  represent  the  general 
result  of  these  attempts. 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      217 

Between  Calvary  and  Pentecost 

We  can,  to  begin  with,  easily  follow  the  disciples  as 
they  fled  heart-broken  on  the  fateful  day  from  Jerusalem. 
We  can  follow  their  thoughts  and  questionings  on  the  way, 
as  well  as  their  tender  memories  as  they  pass  spot  after  spot 
for  ever  consecrated  by  something  said  or  done  by  their 
Master.  He  must  have  been  continually  in  their  thoughts 
by  day,  and  in  their  dreams  by  night,  all  the  way  to 
Galilee.  How  was  it  possible  that  He  could  have  failed  ? 
Was  He  deceived  ?  Were  they  deceived  in  Him  ?  How 
could  God  have  let  such  an  One  die,  and  in  such  a  way  ? 

Every  hope  seemed  gone  ;  and  yet — and  yet  they  had 
been  surer  of  Him  than  they  had  been  of  God  Himself. 
The  light  in  His  eyes,  the  tones  of  His  voice,  face,  form 
and  figure  came  back  to  them.  He  had  given  them  some- 
thing that  no  one  else  ever  had — a  new  life  that  could 
never  be  destroyed. 

So,  with  faint  gleams  occasionally  upon  a  sea  of  despair, 
they  are  home  in  Galilee  once  more.  It  was  a  struggle 
between  the  divine  impression  made  upon  them  by  His 
life  with  them,  and  the  shame  and  terror  of  the  Cross.  One 
after  another  they  came  to  Capernaum — each  with  the 
same  fight  going  on  in  his  soul.  They  could  not  help  but 
meet,  if  only  to  comfort  each  other  and  to  remind  each 
other  of  the  happy  days  that  were  gone  for  ever.  The 
world  would  never  be  the  same  again.  Perhaps  it  was  at 
Peter's  house  they  met  in  the  gUmmering  light  when  the 
day's  work  was  done.  How  often  they  went  over  the 
great  romance  of  their  life — how  sad  to  think  of  1 

Did  they  hear  any  rumours  from  Jerusalem  ?  Did 
some  of  the  women  who  had  stayed  to  the  very  end  come 
with  tales  of  an  empty  grave,  and  of  passing  visions  of 
a  well-known  face  ?  As  they  talked  of  Him,  did  their 
hearts  begin  to  burn  within  them  as  of  old  ?  The  authority 
of  the  Master  began  once  more  to  assert  over  them  its 
sway  stronger  than  death.  They  read  the  53rd  of  Isaiah, 
and  saw  in  it  a  picture  of  the  suffering  Servant  who  was 
still  their  Master.  And  was  it  not  Peter — repentant, 
aching,  impulsive  Peter — to  whom  one  night  was  given, 
in  the  very  midst  of  eloquent,  reckless  words,  the  glowing 


2i8    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

vision  of  the  Face  Divine  ?  That  moment  of  ecstasy 
came  back  again  and  again  with  greater  power  and  reality 
to  the  man  who  wanted  it  most,  and  who  could  never 
forget  the  first  great  moment  in  which  he  had  said,  "  Thou 
art  the  Christ."  Then  also  from  him  the  fire  spread 
to  hearts  made  warm  again  amidst  the  scenes  of  the  first 
great  triumphs  of  their  Lord,  after  the  first  terror  had 
spent  itself.  Then  at  last  the  coming  Pentecostal  Feast 
called  them  back  to  the  scene  of  the  tragedy  that  was 
slowly  becoming  a  triumph  in  their  minds,  and  on  the 
scene  to  a  greater  Pentecost  than  ever  their  brightest 
dream  had  pictured. 

If  any  view  of  the  Resurrection — ^whether  traditional 
or  critical — is  to  become  educationally  effective,  or  any- 
thing more  than  a  rigid  theological  dogma,  it  will  be  by 
trying  in  some  such  way  as  this  to  make  it  psychologically 
probable  and  real. 

The  Story  of  a  Great  Spiritual  Struggle 

It  is  in  any  case  a  difficult  task  which  faces  the  teacher 
here  ;  but  he  can  never  give  up  the  attempt  to  accomplish 
it.  Christian  teachers  who  give  thought  to  their  work 
can  never  remain  satisfied  with  merely  retailing  now 
one,  now  another,  of  the  Biblical  stories  without  attempting 
to  give  one  unified  picture.  It  is  the  inner  history  and 
experience  of  the  disciples  during  this  time  that  must 
be  made  as  real  and  vivid  as  possible.  On  one  side,  the 
sense  of  miracle  and  mystery  by  which  the  events  are 
surrounded  in  history  and  faith  must  not  be  lost.  But 
there  is  no  justification,  on  the  other  side,  for  burdening 
the  moral  experience  of  the  disciples  with  an  ancient 
and  materialistic  view  of  the  universe  which  we  cannot 
wish  to  perpetuate. 

Once  the  growing  mind  has  been  impressed  by  some 
conception  of  the  severe  spiritual  struggle  through  which 
the  disciples  passed  triumphantly,  the  youth  may  be 
taken  later  on  through  the  Biblical  narratives  themselves. 
They  will  then  be  ready  to  appreciate  their  moral  meaning, 
and  their  more  or  less  legendary  character  may  be  dis- 
cussed without  danger.     The  emphasis  of  the  Resurrection 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      219 

will  have  been  laid  for  them  in  the  proper  place,  namely, 
on  the  supreme  value  of  the  personahty  of  Jesus,  and  the 
impossibility  of  thinking  that  death  could  ever  destroy 
it.  Their  hold  upon  the  life  to  come  will  be  strengthened, 
and  their  ideas  with  regard  to  it  kept  pure  and  moral. 
Finally,  they  will  also  have  had  the  supreme  lesson  on 
the  infinite  importance  of  human  personality  to  God 
and  man.  These  constitute  the  real  Easter  faith,  the 
essential  constructive  and  educative  elements  in  the 
narratives  of  the  Resurrection.  And  that  teacher  will 
keep  the  feast  best  of  all  who  can  give  the  simplest,  and 
the  most  real,  picture  of  the  inner  history  of  the  disciples 
between  Calvary  and  Pentecost. 


THE  EASTER  MESSAGE 

So  far  as  the  Easter  Faith  of  the  New  Testament  is 
concerned,  and  probably  so  far  also  as  the  needs  of  moral 
and  religious  instruction  go  in  our  day,  we  might  rest 
satisfied  with  the  foregoing  discussion  of  the  Resurrection. 
It  does  not,  however,  do  full  justice  to  the  New  Testament 
itself.  The  Easter  Message  of  the  visions  of  the  Lord 
and  of  the  empty  grave  are  also  part  of  the  New  Testament 
as  well  as  the  essential  Easter  Faith.  It  is,  of  course, 
the  religious  faith  in  the  continued  life  of  Jesus  in  a  full 
and  personal  form  that  must  remain  central ;  but  we  must 
face  also  the  forms  taken  by  that  faith  in  the  minds 
of  the  early  Christians,  the  events  which  produced  or 
occasioned  their  behef ,  and  especially  the  relation  in  which 
the  empty  grave  and  the  resurrection  of  the  body  stood 
to  their  behef  in  the  continued  hfe.  This  discussion  of 
the  Easter  Message  will  naturally  be  suitable  only  for  the 
later  adolescent  and  senior  classes. 

Discussion  of  the  Easter  Message 

We  cannot  enter  upon  such  a  discussion  with  any  profit 
unless    we    distinguish    between    the    general    conditions 


220    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

and  beliefs  of  the  first  century  and  those  of  modern  days. 
For  us  the  faith  in  the  continued  personal  hfe  of  the 
Lord,  or  the  permanent  value  of  the  character  and  person- 
ality of  Jesus,  may  be  and  actually  is  quite  independent 
of  the  historical  facts  with  regard  to  the  empty  grave, 
the  physical  resurrection  and  the  details  of  the  visions 
of  the  first  disciples.  These  questions  are  of  interest  to 
us  mainly  because  they  were  so  closely  connected  with 
the  form  taken  by  the  religious  faith  of  the  early  Christians, 
and  because  of  the  light  they  cast  upon  the  way  in  which 
the  disciples  defended  that  faith.  It  is,  therefore,  quite 
possible  that,  while  sharing  the  faith  of  the  first  disciples, 
we  may  have  to  reject  as  mistaken  and  inadequate  some 
of  the  reasons  which  they  gave  for  holding  that  faith. 

The  Story  of  the  Empty  Grave 

We  have,  it  is  true,  only  a  limited  knowledge  of  the 
views  of  that  time  with  regard  to  the  relation  between 
the  body  and  the  soul.  More  or  less  Greek  views  of  the 
body  as  the  prison-house  from  which  the  soul  escaped 
at  death  were  to  some  extent  current  among  the  Jews 
in  a  modified  form  ;  but  there  can  be  little  doubt  that 
the  popular  Jewish  view  (with  which  in  this  instance  we 
are  mainly  concerned)  could  not  think  of  the  future  life 
— in  the  Messianic  Age,  for  instance — without  the  resur- 
rection of  the  body  in  some  form  or  other,  that  is,  without 
an  empty  grave. 

The  first  disciples  could  not,  therefore,  believe  in  the 
continued  personal  life  of  the  Lord  without  at  the  same 
time  taking  it  for  granted  that  the  grave  was  empty, 
whether  they  examined  it  or  not.  The  earliest  witnesses 
do  not  mention  the  empty  grave,  nor  is  the  empty  grave 
ever  given  as  a  reason  for  belief  in  the  Resurrection. 
All  the  same,  it  is  very  probable  that  even  Paul  would 
say  that  the  grave  must  have  been  empty.  The  two 
points  at  issue  are  whether  any  stories  of  the  empty 
grave  accompanied  the  visions  and  the  belief  in  the 
Resurrection  from  the  first,  and  if  so,  whether  there 
was  any  historical  foundation  for  them.  The  evidence 
of  the  New  Testament  is  very  uncertain  and  very  in- 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      221 

adequate  on  these  points,  and  the  opinions  of  modern 
scholars  are  widely  divided.  Some  think  that  all  the 
stories  of  the  empty  grave  are  simply  legendary  growths 
based  on  the  natural  inferences  of  the  disciples  from  the 
visions,  and  that  there  is  no  historical  justification  for 
them.  Others  think  that  there  must  be  some  substratum 
of  historical  fact  underneath  them,  and  that  the  grave  was 
really  found  to  be  empty.  They  then  attempt  in  different 
ways  to  explain  the  fact.  Probably  the  truth  is  that 
the  evidence  does  not  justify  a  definite  conclusion  either 
way.  In  any  case  the  New  Testament  seems  to  show 
that  the  empty  grave  had  no  influence  in  producing  the 
belief  in  the  Resurrection.  It  is  never  spontaneously 
referred  to  by  the  Christians  as  a  reason  for  belief.  It 
received  prominence  only  in  answer  to  the  objections 
raised  by  Jewish  opponents.  Attention  having  once  been 
called  to  the  grave,  the  Christian  imagination  continued 
to  play  about  it,  until  we  have  at  last  the  marvellous 
descriptions  of  the  actual  Resurrection  itself  in  the 
Apocryphal  Gospels.  In  the  New  Testament  there  is 
still  a  good  deal  of  restraint  shown  in  describing  what 
happened  at  the  grave  itself ;  but  even  there  we  can  trace 
a  definite  development  in  the  argument  and  the  stories 
connected  with  it. 

Development  of  the  Story 

In  Paul  and  in  the  early  speeches  of  Acts  there  is  no 
mention  of  the  empty  grave  at  all.  In  Mark,  three  women 
go  to  the  grave  to  anoint  the  body,  and  find  the  stone 
rolled  away,  while  in  the  tomb  a  young  man  in  a  white 
robe  sits.  He  tells  them  that  Jesus  is  risen,  and  bids 
them  tell  the  disciples  that  the  Master  has  gone  before 
them  into  Galilee.  They  run  away  frightened  and  do 
not  say  a  word  to  any  one  in  their  awe.  Since  the  genuine 
end  of  Mark  is  lost,  we  can  only  guess  how  the  narrative 
was  continued.  In  Matthew  we  are  told  that  the  Jews 
had  set  a  guard  of  Roman  soldiers  to  watch  the  tomb, 
which  was  sealed.  When  the  women  came  a  great  shock 
of  earthquake  occurred,  and  an  angel  of  the  Lord  descended 
and  rolled  away  the  stone.     The  soldiers  are  struck  down 


222    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

unconscious,   but   the   angel   shows  the   tomb   empty   to 
the  women  and  bids  them  tell  the  disciples. 

In  the  Synoptic  Gospels  and  the  Gospel  of  Peter 

This  they  do  immediately.  When  we  come  to  John, 
we  find  that  Mary  Magdalene  goes  alone  to  the  tomb, 
sees  the  stone  rolled  away  and  the  tomb  empty.  She 
tells  Peter  and  the  other  disciple  whom  Jesus  loved. 
They  run  to  the  place  and  see  for  themselves  that  the 
body  is  not  there.  From  a  comparison  of  these  narratives 
about  the  empty  grave  as  they  are  found  in  Mark  xvi. 
1-8,  Matt,  xxvii.  62-xxviii.  16,  Luke  xxiv.  1-12,  John 
XX.  i-io,  with  the  silence  of  Paul  in  i  Cor.  xv.  1-8 
and  of  Peter  in  the  speeches  of  Acts,  it  will  be  seen  that 
the  development  of  the  narrative  is  in  two  directions — 
the  aim  apparently  being  to  make  it  more  and  more 
certain  that  the  grave  was  really  empty,  and  that  the 
only  way  to  account  for  the  fact  was  the  Resurrection. 
The  New  Testament  stops  short  of  giving  a  description 
of  the  actual  Resurrection  itself,  though  the  story  of  the 
guard  and  the  earthquake  in  Matthew  comes  near  it. 
This  last  step  is  reserved  for  the  more  unrestrained  imagina- 
tion of  the  Apocryphal  Gospel  of  Peter.  However  many 
legendary  elements  may  have  crept  into  the  narrative 
of  the  New  Testament,  it  is  reserve  itself  when  compared 
with  the  unlicensed  grotesqueness  of  the  Gospel  of  Peter. 
There  we  are  told  that  the  elders  and  scribes  hold  watch 
at  the  grave  with  the  Roman  guard  under  Petronius. 
The  grave  is  sealed  with  seven  seals,  a  tent  is  pitched 
near  by,  and  the  crowds  from  Jerusalem  come  out  to  see. 
During  the  night  the  heavens  are  opened  and  two  men 
come  down,  the  great  stone  moves  of  itself  to  one  side, 
and  the  two  men  enter  the  grave.  Then  all  the  soldiers 
see  three  men  come  out,  and  they  are  followed  by  a  cross. 
The  heads  of  the  two  men  reach  to  heaven,  while  that  of 
the  man  whom  they  support  reaches  above  the  heavens. 

The  whole  story  has  become  grotesque — as  far  removed 
as  anything  could  be  from  both  the  restraint  and  the 
spirit  of  our  Gospels.  There  is  no  point,  however,  as 
we  trace  the  story  backward  from  the  Gospel  of  Peter 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS       223 

to  the  Gospel  of  Mark,  at  which  we  can  say  :  Here  we 
come  at  last  upon  a  bedrock  of  fact.  We  can  only- 
comfort  ourselves  by  saying  that  the  story  of  the  empty 
tomb  was  after  all  only  a  dark  and  dangerous  bypath 
even  for  the  faith  of  the  early  disciples,  while  we  are 
thankful  that  we  need  not  travel  that  way  at  all  in  order 
to  reach  as  strong  a  faith  as  theirs  in  the  permanent 
value  of  the  character,  work  and  personality  of  Jesus, 
and  in  His  continued,  full,  personal  life  after  death. 
The  only  reason  for  following  this  bypath  at  all  in  our 
moral  and  religious  instruction  is  that  the  contents  of 
the  New  Testament  demand  it,  and  that  it  enables  us  to 
illustrate  the  difficulties  and  weaknesses  as  well  as  the 
strength  of  the  Resurrection-faith  of  early  Christianity, 
and  that  it  throws  into  more  vivid  contrast  the  reality 
underlying  its  temporary  forms. 


5 

THE  ASCENSION  IN  CHRISTIAN  INSTRUCTION 

This  discussion  would  not  be  complete  without  some 
reference  to  the  Ascension,  but  a  few  words  will  suffice 
to  place  it  in  its  proper  relation  to  the  Resurrection. 

The  Story  of  the  Ascension 

In  his  Gospel  Luke  barely  mentions  the  fact  that 
Jesus  "  parted  from  them  and  was  carried  up  into  heaven," 
but  in  the  Book  of  Acts  he  gives  the  only  detailed  descrip- 
tion of  the  Ascension  itself  to  be  found  in  the  New  Testa- 
ment. The  narrative  is  not  an  integral  part  of  the  Book 
of  Acts.  It  seems,  indeed,  to  be  deliberately  introduced 
by  the  author  in  order  to  correct  the  impression  made 
by  the  Gospel,  that  the  Ascension  took  place  on  the  same 
day  as  the  Resurrection.  In  the  spurious  ending  to 
Mark  also  it  takes  place  on  the  day  of  Resurrection. 
In  John,  while  there  is  a  scarcely  perceptible  interval, 
according  to  one  passage,  between  the  two  events,  the 
Gospel   as   a   whole    looks    upon    the   Resurrection,   the 


224    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Ascension  and  the  Parousia  as  one  spiritual  process. 
In  Paul,  too,  there  is  no  room  for  the  Ascension  as  a 
separate  event.  For  Him  the  Resurrection  is  a  resur- 
rection to  the  right  hand  of  God  in  power,  and  it  is  thence 
He  makes  Himself  known  as  still  living  to  His  disciples, 
including  Paul  himself. 

As  a  matter  of  fact,  the  idea  or  the  faith  which  is  here 
clothed  in  the  garb  of  history  is  elsewhere  generally 
expressed  by  the  figure  of  Christ  sitting  at  the  right  hand 
of  God,  the  phrase  being  used  about  a  dozen  times  by 
the  different  writers  of  the  New  Testament. 

How  these  different  representations  of  the  Ascension 
are  related,  and  exactly  how  the  Ascension  was  con- 
nected with  the  Resurrection  on  one  side  and  with  the 
Parousia  on  the  other,  it  is  difficult  to  say.  Perhaps  we 
do  not  know  enough  of  the  history  of  early  Christian 
thought  to  form  any  clear  judgment.  In  any  case,  what- 
ever view  may  be  held  as  to  the  bodily  resurrection,  very 
few  would  now  insist  upon  a  literal  interpretation  of  the 
very  materialistic  Ascension  story  in  Acts.  Its  allegorical 
or  mythological  character  is  very  generally  recognized. 
In  its  present  form,  at  any  rate,  it  is  quite  unhistorical. 

How  it  arose  is  another  matter.  It  may  have  been 
originally  the  story  of  another  Resurrection-vision  with 
the  usual  mysterious  disappearance  at  the  end.  More 
important  than  the  form  of  the  representation  is  the 
meaning  of  the  Ascension  for  the  faith  and  life  of  the 
disciples  —  what  it  stands  for  in  their  experience.  It 
was  undoubtedly  intended  to  make  clear  and  intelligible 
the  faith  that  Jesus  is  Lord,  that  as  God's  representative 
all  authority  has  been  placed  in  His  hands.  Not  only  has 
He  come  out  of  His  grave  alive,  but  He  has  come  as  the 
living  Lord.  It  is  essentially  the  same  faith  as  is  ex- 
pressed also  through  behef  in  the  Resurrection.  Its 
educational  value  and  purpose  are  similar  to  those  of  the 
Resurrection-visions,  and  if  it  is  to  be  used  at  all  in 
religious  instruction,  its  place  is  among  those  visions. 
The  Ascension  is  not  an  historical  event,  but  it  is  another 
attempt  to  represent  an  historical  faith  in  terms  of  ancient 
views  of  the  world  which  have  disappeared.  We  may 
have  the  same  faith,  but  our  changed  views  of  the  world 


THE  BIRTH  AND  RESURRECTION  OF  JESUS      225 

and  heaven  make  it  impossible  for  us  to  express  it  in  the 
same  form.  We  must  express  it  not  in  terms  of  time  and 
space,  but  in  terms  of  moraUty  and  rehgion — ^which  also 
the  first  disciples  did  for  the  most  part. 

BOOKS 

Bruce  (A.  B.i). — The  Miraculous  Element  in  the  Gospels.     (London, 

1887.) 
Gordon  (G.  A,). — Religion  and  Miracle.     (London,  1910.) 
Inge  (W.  R.). — Truth  and  Falsehood  in  Religion.     (London,  1906.) 
Lake    (Kirsopp). — The    Historical   Evidence  for    the    Resurrection    of 

Jesus  Christ.     (London  :    Williams  &  Norgate.) 
Lyttleton  (A.  T.). — The  Place  of  Miracles  in  Religion.     (London, 

1899.) 
Meyer  (A,). — Die  Auferstehung  Christi.     (Tiibingen,  1905.) 
SoLTAU  (W.). — The  Birth  of  Jesus  Christ.     (London,  1907.) 
Traub  (G.). — Die  Wunder  im  Neuen  Testament.     (Tiibingen,  1906.) 
ZuRHELLEN. — Wie  erzdhkn  wir,  etc.     (See  Chap.  IX.) 


15 


CHAPTER  XII 

THE  APOSTLE  PAUL   AND   HIS   LETTERS 

1.  Paul  in   the   New   Testament. — Jesus   and   Paul — Sources    of   our 

Knowledge — Extent  and  Character  of  the  Sources. 

2.  The  Historical  Significance  of  Paul. — His  Spiritual  Independence — 

His  Vindication  of  the  Independence  of  Christianity — The 
Creator  of  the  Christian  Church,  Christian  Theology  and  Christian 
Literature — Paul  in  Christian  History. 

3.  The    Permanent    Value    of  Paul. — Matthew    Arnold    and    Paul  — 

Hellenism  and  Judaism  in  Paul — Paul's  Two  Great  Aims — the 
Free  Personality  and  the  Community. 

4.  Paul  in  Christian  Instruction. — Paul  and  Jesus  in  Modem  Instruc- 

tion— Paul  a  Difl&cult  Subject — Nevertheless  Necessary. 

5.  The  Story  of  Paul's  Life. — Natural  and  Artificial  Difficulties — The 

Traditional  Method  Unsatisfactory — The  Story  of  Paul. 

6.  The  Work  and  Teaching  of  Paul. — The  Background  of  Paul's  Work 

and  Teaching — His  Personal  Experience — His  Typical  Struggles 
— The  Motives  of  Paul's  Theology. 

7.  The  Ethics,  Theology  and  Religion  of  Paul. — Paul's  Ethical  Teaching 

— The  Theological  Framework — Three  Main  Lines  of  Thought 
— The  Anti-Jewish  Apologetic — The  Missionary  Theology — The 
Theology  of  the  Spirit — Central  Doctrine  of  Paul — The  Religion 
of  Paul. 


PAUL  IN  THE  NEW  TESTAMENT 

It  is  certainly  the  first  and  the  ultimate  task  of  the 
Christian  teacher  to  make  Jesus  Christ  live  effectively 
in  the  mind  and  heart  and  will — in  the  conscience  of  His 
pupils.  With  as  little  doubt,  the  second  task  of  the 
teacher  of  the  New  Testament  is  to  make  Paul,  the  greatest 
messenger  Jesus  has  yet  found,  deliver  his  own  peculiar 
message  to  men,  and  exercise  his  own  peculiar  power  over 
men  in  the  service  of  his  Lord.  As  the  second  great 
personality    in    the    history    of    early    Christianity,    the 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  227 

Apostle  is  without  a  rivaL  Strictly  there  is  no  third 
except  the  great  Unknown  who  stands  behind  the 
Johannine  writings. 


Jesus  and  Paul 

At  the  beginning  of  the  greatest  spiritual  rnovement 
in  human  history  stand  these  two  personalities  of  such 
extraordinary  power  and  originality — one  of  them  at 
least,  if  not  both,  towering  into  sheer  sublimity  far  above 
all  the  heroes  of  the  centuries.  In  them  and  in  the 
relations  between  them  are  mirrored  all  the  most  im- 
portant spiritual  problems  which  have  ever  vexed  the 
soul  of  man — the  reality  of  the  unseen,  the  nature  and 
means  of  communion  with  God,  the  value  of  personality, 
the  essential  nature  of  Christianity  and  its  relation  to 
other  religions,  the  relation  between  history  and  religion 
as  well  as  the  relation  between  religion  and  theology. 
To  make  these  two  live  again  in  the  souls  of  men  is  a 
work  not  only  of  surpassing  interest,  but  also  of  sur- 
passing importance  for  the  moral  and  spiritual  welfare 
of  mankind.  This  has  become  self-evident  so  far  as  the 
personality,  work  and  message  of  Jesus  are  concerned. 
What  is,  perhaps,  not  yet  so  fully  realized  is  that  it  is 
essential  to  understand  and  appreciate  the  personality, 
work  and  message  of  Paul  also,  both  for  the  sake  of  his 
own  independent  value  and  in  order  to  understand  the 
place  of  Jesus  in  and  above  the  whole  Christian  movement. 
It  is,  indeed,  the  secret  of  the  power  of  early  Christian 
history  that  these  two  stand  together  at  its  birth  and 
baptism.  The  problem  of  their  relation  to  each  other  in 
dependence  and  independence,  holds  the  key  to  the  inter- 
pretation of  the  New  Testament. 

In  order  to  get  within  reach  of  the  solution  of  that 
problem  and  in  order  to  enter  into  the  full  heritage  of  the 
New  Testament,  the  Christian  teacher  and  the  Christian 
disciple  must  try  again  and  again  to  make  Paul  a  living 
reality  to  his  mind  and  conscience. 

Fortunately,  we  have  fuller  and  more  direct  information 
about  Paul  than  about  any  of  his  contemporaries.  That 
knowledge  comes  to  us  mainly  from  two  reliable  sources. 


228    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 


Sources  of  our  Knowledge  of  Paul 

1 .  Incorporated  in  the  Book  of  Acts  is  a  document 
which  is  generally  recognized  as  a  first-hand  account 
written  by  Luke  the  Physician,  the  friend  and  companion 
of  the  Apostle.  This  provides  us  with  a  direct  record  of  an 
interested  spectator  who  was  also  something  of  a  hero- 
worshipper.  Paul's  own  revelations  of  his  mind  and  heart 
in  his  letters  find  an  echo  and  an  effective  comment  in 
those  more  concrete  and  particular  observations  of  his 
faithful  fellow- worker. 

2.  We  have  also  the  good  fortune  of  possessing  at 
least  eight  and  probably  ten  letters  written  or  dictated 
by  Paul  and  more  carefully  preserved  than  any  other 
literary  records  of  his  time.  They  are  all  genuine  personal 
letters,  written  to  his  converts  and  Churches,  They  are 
not  treatises  or  essays  dealing  systematically  with  special 
subjects  of  general  interest,  but  letters  meant  originall}^ 
for  the  use  of  individuals  or  small  groups  all  more  or 
less  known  to  the  Apostle.  They  may  not,  therefore, 
enable  us  to  give  a  systematic  account  of  his  thought, 
but  they  are  all  the  more  valuable  because  so  often  they 
are  unconscious  revelations  of  his  life  and  character. 

One  of  them,  and  the  most  brief  of  all — the  letter  to 
Philemon — is  a  very  intimate  personal  note,  written 
merely  to  accompany  the  return  of  a  runaway  slave  to  his 
owner,  and  recommending  him  to  the  renewed  care  of  his 
Christian  master.  For  all  its  brevity  it  is  a  miracle  of  self- 
revelation. 

Another  was  written  to  Christian  disciples  in  Rome,  and 
stands  at  the  other  extreme  from  Philemon,  on  the  verge 
of  becoming  a  systematic  discussion  of  the  main  message 
of  the  Apostle. 

There  are  two  letters  (probably  incorporating  a  third) 
written  to  Corinth  in  Greece  and  dealing  mostly  with  some 
definite  problems  of  the  application  of  the  Gospel  to  the 
life  of  the  Church  and  the  community. 

One  is  a  letter  of  thanks  to  his  Christian  friends  at 
Philippi  in  Macedonia,  acknowledging  their  care  for  him 
while  he  was   in  prison  at   Rome,  and   full  of  personal 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  229 

revelations  of  his  heart  and  of  his  love  for  them  and  for 
his  work. 

Two  are  directed  to  the  Christians  of  Salonica,  and 
are  mainly  noted  for  their  discussions  of  the  early  Christian 
eschatological  hopes  and  fervours  which  were  creating 
difficulties  among  them.  Another  is  a  strong  appeal  to 
stand  fast  in  Christian  liberty,  which  went  to  the  Christian 
Churches  of  Galatia  in  Asia  Minor  ;  while  the  last  two — 
Ephesians  and  Colossians — went  to  the  Province  of  Asia 
— the  most  populous  and  significant  region  of  the  Empire, 
and  in  many  ways  the  centre  of  the  religion,  commerce 
and  thought  of  the  world. 

The  three  Pastoral  Epistles  to  Timothy  and  Titus  are 
also  attributed  to  Paul,  but  it  is  doubtful  whether  more 
than  fragments  of  them  at  most  have  come  from  him, 
while  there  is  no  doubt  that  the  Epistle  to  the  Hebrews 
has  been  falsely  attributed  to  the  Apostle. 

These  are  the  documents  which  provide  us  with 
authentic  raw-material — so  far  as  they  go — for  describing 
the  history,  work  and  personality  of  Paul.  The  letters 
show  that  he  was  a  man  who  had  an  extraordinary  capacity 
for  self-revelation.  He  possessed  the  infrequent  gift  not 
only  of  observing  the  facts  of  his  inner  life  and  the  struggles 
of  his  will,  but  also  of  interpreting  and  describing  his 
soul's  experiences  with  clearness  and  power — in  an  in- 
telligent and  intelligible  form. 

Luke  also  was  a  descriptive  writer  of  no  mean  power, 
and  the  dramatic  moments  in  Paul's  adventurous  travels 
lose  nothing  of  their  significance  in  the  telling. 

Extent  and  Character  of  the  Sources 

There  is,  however,  still  a  great  deal  that  these  docu- 
ments (and  some  other  more  indirect  records  of  Paul  in 
Acts  and  elsewhere)  do  not  tell  us  about  the  Apostle, 
and  it  is  necessary  to  emphasize  the  fragmentary  character 
of  our  knowledge  at  its  best.  They  barely  cover  the  last 
ten  years  of  his  life  and  activities.  There  are  at  least 
fifty  years — and  those  the  formative  and  most  energetic 
years — about  which  we  know  very  little  directly,  though 
we  may  be  able  to  infer  a  great  deal  from  the  letters 


230    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

and  Luke's  diary.  Moreover,  the  letters  which  have  been 
preserved  represent  only  a  small  portion  of  Paul's  corre- 
spondence even  during  the  last  period  of  his  life.  Being 
also  purely  occasional  in  their  nature,  they  take  for  granted 
a  great  many  things  essential  for  our  full  interpretation 
of  them  and  their  writer.  They  contain  only  fragments 
of  Paul's  thought,  and  though  there  are  many  signs  of 
a  more  or  less  complete  intellectual  system  behind  the 
letters,  it  is  a  precarious  task  to  reconstruct  that  system 
out  of  the  broken  fragments  which  they  preserve. 

The  result  is,  that  there  still  remain  many  unsolved 
problems  with  regard  to  the  life,  personality  and  theology 
of  the  Apostle,  and  it  is  necessary  for  the  teacher  to  realize 
that  fact. 

There  are  problems  not  only  of  the  chronology  and 
course  of  his  life,  but  also  of  the  character  and  significance 
of  his  education,  the  meaning  of  his  conversion,  the  history 
of  the  first  seventeen  years  of  his  life  as  a  Christian,  his 
relation  to  Barnabas  and  to  the  first  Apostles,  of  his 
exact  relation  to  the  Greek  world  and  its  thought,  the 
influence  of  the  Mystery-Cults  upon  him,  as  well  as  of 
his  historical  and  spiritual  relation  to  Jesus  Christ.  These 
and  many  similar  questions  with  regard  to  Paul  are  still 
not  settled. 

It  is  true  that  we  can  often  fall  back  upon  probable 
inferences,  and  upon  our  general  knowledge  of  the  time 
and  its  conditions  for  help  to  solve  them  ;  and  a  great 
deal  of  what  passes  as  Paul  and  Paulinism  has  its  sole 
source  in  such  inferences. 

The  teacher  will,  therefore,  find  it  necessary  to  give 
his  whole  mind  to  an  ever-renewed  study  of  Paul,  to 
scrutinize  carefully  every  picture  and  deal  honestly  with 
his  pupils  with  regard  to  his  own  reconstruction  of  the 
figure  of  the  Apostle. 

2 

THE  HISTORICAL  SIGNIFICANCE  OF  PAUL 

Whatever  inadequacy  there  may  be  in  our  sources, 
it  is  abundantly  clear  that  Paul  played  the  main  part  in 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  231 

the  development  of  Christianity,  and  we  can  see  clearly- 
some  of  the  main  directions  in  which  his  central  signifi- 
cance for  early  Christian  history  lies. 

Paul's  Spiritual  Independence 

I.  In  the  first  place,  he  became  of  primary  import- 
ance because  he  had  fought  his  way  more  or  less  inde- 
pendently to  a  moral  and  spiritual  level  of  thought  and 
life  which  was  not  far  removed  from  where  Jesus  Himself 
had  stood.  It  is  true  that  he  did  not  reach  that  level 
either  so  easily  or  so  naturally  as  Jesus.  The  Master 
towers  far  above  the  Apostle  in  simple  and  natural 
majesty  of  bearing,  and  in  His  unclouded  certitude  of 
soul.  Paul's  outlook  was  never  so  clear  nor  so  direct 
and  effective  as  that  of  Jesus.  Paul  had  come  to  it 
through  devious  ways  over  arid,  trackless  wastes,  and 
he  came  in  bedraggled  garments  and  bespattered  with 
mud,  sore  and  sick,  and  with  his  patience  worn  by  failures. 
Still  he  had,  with  so  much  travail,  come  so  far  upon  his 
way  that  it  seems  to  have  required  only  the  touch  of  the 
Spirit  of  Jesus  at  a  critical  moment  for  him  to  discover 
the  secret  of  God  and  His  Fatherhood,  man  and  his 
brotherhood,  life  and  its  triumphant  redemption. 

In  the  story  of  Christian  origins,  Paul  is  no  secondary 
figure  who  has  simply  borrowed  all  that  he  has.  In 
many  ways  he  is  a  personality  of  striking  originality  in 
his  experience  and  conception  of  the  Gospel  as  well  as 
in  his  intellectual  and  missionary  application  of  it.  There 
is  nothing  second-hand  about  his  religious  faith,  although 
the  direct  and  indirect  personal  influence  of  Jesus  at  the 
critical  moment  counted  for  so  much  in  his  history. 
There  is  little  that  is  merely  borrowed  in  his  theology, 
though  he  owes  so  much  to  the  conceptions  of  Pharisaism. 
His  Church  is  an  original  conception  in  spite  of  its  growth 
out  of  the  Primitive  Christian  community.  His  universal 
mission  was  a  new  thing  in  history,  in  spite  of  its  many 
parallels  with  the  activities  of  the  vagrant  priests  of 
Mithras  and  Isis,  of  the  wandering  teachers  of  an  eclectic 
philosophy  and  of  the  '  apostles  '  of  Judaism  in  the 
Hellenistic  world. 


232    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Nearest  to  Jesus  he  stands  in  the  originaHty  and 
universahty  of  his  spiritual  experience,  the  directness  of 
his  touch  with  God,  the  courage  with  which  he  accepted 
the  results,  the  daring  and  the  stubborn  will  with  which 
he  obeyed  the  vision  when  it  came. 

It  is  futile  to  speculate  whether  Paul  would  ever  have 
won  his  way  through  without  the  timely  help  of  Jesus. 
We  only  know  that  the  compelhng  touch  of  the  Master- 
soul  meant  for  Paul  the  final  opening  of  the  door  of  life, 
and  that  for  Paul  it  was  the  figure  of  Jesus  that  stood  for 
ever  more  at  the  threshold. 

This,  then,  was  the  first  great  deed  of  Paul — to  come 
groping  in  the  dark  to  the  very  threshold  of  the  new 
discovery  and  to  recognize  in  Jesus  the  hand  of  the  Lord 
who  helped  him  through. 

Vindication  of  the  Independence  of  Christianity 

2.  Secondly,  when  Paul  had  found  in  Jesus  Christ  the 
God  he  sought  and  the  fuller  life  for  which  he  longed, 
he  also  found  the  movement  which  Jesus  had  already 
created  in  danger  of  settling  down  into  an  obscure  Jewish 
sect.  He  recognized  in  it  the  making  of  a  world-religion 
and  the  stronger  rival  of  the  Judaism  of  his  dreams.  So 
he  boldly  went  forth  to  make  it  what  it  was  meant  to  be 
and  what  he  somehow  knew  Jesus  Himself  had  meant  it 
to  be.  In  thought  and  practice  he  freed  from  the  bonds 
of  Judaism  the  Gospel  of  the  free  grace  of  God  revealed 
and  incarnate  in  the  living  Christ  for  the  redemption  of 
mankind.  He  justified  its  independence  and  originality, 
practically  and  theoretically,  both  against  its  weak- 
kneed  friends  and  its  Jewish  enemies,  using  their  own 
intellectual  and  historical  weapons  against  themselves. 
He  used  the  Jewish  terms  and  Jewish  doctrines  to  vindicate 
the  independence,  originality  and  supremacy  of  the  new 
religion.  It  was  probably  the  only  means  by  which  he 
could  theoretically  set  free  the  Christian  Gospel  from  the 
bonds  of  Judaism  as  well  as  from  the  halting  compromises 
of  the  Primitive  Jewish-Christian  Church. 

In  practice  also  it  was  Paul  who  did  actually  take  the 
new  religion  out  into  the  wide  world  and  planted  it  firmly 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  233 

in  the  heart  of  the  great  cities  of  the  Roman  Empire. 
He  was  the  most  effective  missionary  Christianity  has  ever 
known.  His  mission  was  far  greater  in  idea  and  plan  and 
method  than  even  in  its  actual  performance.  It  is  true 
that  he  had  a  large  number  of  helpers  in  this  work,  and 
some  forerunners,  but  his  was  the  master-mind  and 
master- will  in  the  whole  movement.  Before  he  died,  the 
main  strategic  points  in  four  great  provinces  of  the 
Empire — Galatia,  Asia,  Macedonia  and  Achaia — had  been 
occupied  by  groups  of  Christian  converts,  themselves 
energetic  centres  of  missionary  work  for  Christ,  knowing 
of  each  other  and  rivalling  each  other  in  their  efforts 
within  the  bonds  of  the  same  organization.  That  work 
meant  planting  the  new  Gospel  not  only  in  the  heart 
of  Hellenistic  Asia  but  also  of  Europe.  In  the  hands  of 
Paul  it  meant  planting  Christianity  also  in  a  form  in 
which  it  could  be  assimilated  by  the  peoples  of  the  Graeco- 
Roman  world.  He  started  the  process  of  inserting  the 
Gospel  into  the  living  categories  of  that  world — its  yearn- 
ing for  redemption,  its  hope  of  a  divine  Saviour,  its  mystery- 
rites,  its  collegiate  consciousness  and  its  philosophic  terms. 
Such  was  the  second  great  deed  of  Paul. 

The  Christian  Church,  Christian  Theology, 
Christian  Literature 

3.  Three  other  things  he  did  which  were  each  of 
primary  significance  for  the  history  of  Christianity,  but 
which  we  can  here  group  together.  He  became  the 
effective  creator  of  the  Christian  Church — local  and 
universal ;  he  was  the  first  Christian  theologian  ;  and 
he  laid  the  foundations  of  a  Christian  literature. 

Paul  not  only  evangelized  the  great  cities,  but  also 
organized  his  converts  in  each  place  and  shepherded 
their  souls  carefully  and  patiently.  He  kept  in  close 
touch  with  his  churches  and  had  his  messengers  continually 
passing  to  and  fro  among  them. 

It  was  Paul  also  who  first  attempted  to  give  the 
Christian  Gospel,  experience  and  movement  a  definitely 
intellectual  and  theological  expression.  It  has  indeed 
been  said    that    his    whole  Gospel  was   a  theology.     He 


234    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

certainly  seems  to  have  been  impelled  by  his  very  nature 
and  training  to  search  for  intellectual  forms  by  means 
of  which  he  could  express,  for  his  own  satisfaction  and 
the  edification  of  his  converts,  the  meaning  of  his  and 
their  new  experience  and  Gospel.  He  seems  also  to  have 
definitely  formulated  his  Gospel  in  intellectual  forms  as 
a  weapon  of  offence  and  attack  in  his  dealings  both  with 
Jews  and  Gentiles. 

Finally,  the  service  of  Paul  to  Christian  literature  is 
twofold.  He  was  the  first  comprehensively  and  effectively 
to  claim  the  Old  Testament  as  a  Christian  book,  and  also 
in  his  own  way  to  justify  that  claim.  More  directly, 
his  own  letters  form  the  first  nucleus  of  an  original 
Christian  literature.  He  so  discussed  the  questions 
which  were  of  vital  and  passing  interest  to  his  Churches 
in  his  letters  that  they  introduced  the  Christian  move- 
ment effectively  into  the  realm  of  the  highest  literature. 
In  some  senses  they  were  in  form  and  matter  a  new 
phenomenon  in  the  Greek,  Roman  and  Jewish  world 
of  their  time.  Many  of  their  great  passages  must  have 
come  to  the  men  of  the  time  like  streams  of  living  water 
to  thirsty  souls.  Using  the  colloquial  Greek  of  the  common 
people,  they  gave  fresh  and  classical  utterance  to  some  of 
the  deepest  and  most  universal  experiences  of  the  human 
heart.  Their  fervour  and  enthusiasm,  their  freshness  and 
moral  earnestness,  their  directness  and  simplicity,  must 
have  come  as  a  new  revelation  from  God  to  those  who 
were  accustomed  to  the  foolish  garrulity,  the  elegant 
posing  and  the  empty  rhetoric  of  the  majority  of  the 
literary  men  of  those  generations.  These  were  unique 
services,  and  it  is  they  which  give  to  Paul  his  unique  place 
in  the  development  of  early  Christianity. 

Paul  in  Christian  History 

We  need  not  enlarge  upon  the  significance  and  influence 
of  the  Apostle  Paul  in  and  upon  the  nineteen  centuries 
which  have  passed  since  his  death.  His  power  over  certain 
types  of  mind  has  been  incalculably  great,  though  other 
men,  even  after  repeated  efforts,  have  utterly  failed  to 
appreciate   his   greatness   or    to   understand    him.     Many 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  235 

have  even  shrunk  from  him  in  disgust.  He  has  been  more 
ardently  followed  (though  seldom  loved),  more  bitterly 
hated  and  more  seriously  misunderstood  than  almost 
any  other  great  personality  in  history.  Men  like  Marcion, 
on  the  one  hand,  and  Luther,  on  the  other,  have  revelled 
in  his  presence,  while  the  Neoplatonist  and  the  Hellenic 
mind  have  almost  always  hated  him.  He  has  been  too 
Jewish  for  these,  while  for  others  he  has  been  too  much 
of  a  Greek.  By  way  of  veneration  or  reaction,  however, 
almost  the  whole  history  of  Christianity  might  be  written 
in  terms  of  the  Pauline  experience  and  the  Pauline 
theology.  At  times  he  has  overshadowed  even  the  figure 
of  Jesus  Himself,  and  a  long  line  of  the  men  who  for  good 
or  ill  have  made  the  history  of  Europe  bear  the  marks  of 
Paul  even  more  deeply  then  he  did  '  the  marks  of  Jesus.'  It 
has  sometimes  been  for  ill  rather  than  good,  because  the 
Paul  who  was  thus  honoured  was  not  the  full  and  complete 
Paul. 


3 

THE  PERMANENT  VALUE  OF  PAUL 

Matthew  Arnold  and  Paul 

Ernest  Renan  was  of  opinion  that  Paul  was  now  at 
last  coming  to  the  end  of  his  long  reign,  but,  as  a  matter 
of  fact,  what  he  saw  was  the  reaction  against  a  false 
view  of  Paul,  dissolving  into  a  better  appreciation  of 
Paul's  permanent  significance  and  value — as  a  man  and 
a  thinker  and  a  Christian  personality.  The  fitting  man 
to  answer  Renan,  therefore,  was  Matthew  Arnold,  who 
in  spite  of  many  qualities  which  seemed  to  unfit  him  to 
become  the  interpreter  of  Paul,  was  yet  the  first  to  lead 
us  back  to  a  better  and  more  human  understanding  of  the 
Apostle.  "  Precisely  the  contrary,"  he  writes  in  answer 
to  Renan,  "  I  venture  to  think,  is  the  judgment  to  which 
a  true  criticism  of  men  and  things,  in  our  own  country 
at  least,  leads  us.  .  .  .  The  reign  of  the  real  St.  Paul  is 
only  beginning  ;  his  fundamental  ideas,  disengaged  from 
the  elaborate   misconceptions  with  which   Protestantism 


236    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

has  overlaid  them,  will  have  an  influence  in  the 
future  greater  than  any  which  they  have  yet  had — an 
influence  proportioned  to  their  correspondence  with  a 
number  of  the  deepest  and  most  permanent  facts  of 
human  nature  itself.  .  .  ,  Not  in  our  day  will  Paul  relive, 
with  his  incessant  effort  to  find  a  moral  side  to  miracle, 
with  his  incessant  effort  to  make  the  intellect  follow  and 
secure  all  the  workings  of  the  religious  perception.  Of 
those  who  care  for  religion,  the  multitude  of  us  want  the 
materialism  of  the  Apocalypse,  the  few  want  a  vague 
religiosity.  Science,  which  more  and  more  teaches  us  to 
find  in  the  unapparent  the  real,  will  gradually  serve  to 
conquer  the  materialism  of  popular  religion.  The  friends 
of  vague  religiosity,  on  the  other  hand,  will  be  more  and 
more  taught  by  experience  that  a  theology,  a  scientific 
appreciation  of  the  facts  of  religion,  is  wanted  for  religion. 
.  .  .  Both  these  influences  will  work  for  Paul's  re- 
emergence.  The  doctrine  of  Paul  will  arise  out  of  the 
tomb  where  for  centuries  it  has  lain  buried  ;  it  will  edify 
the  Church  of  the  future.  It  will  have  the  consent  of 
happier  generations,  the  applause  of  less  superstitious 
generations.  All  will  be  too  little  to  pay  half  the  debt 
which  the  Church  of  God  owes  to  this  '  least  of  the 
Apostles,' '  who  was  not  fit  to  be  called  an  Apostle  because 
he  persecuted  the  Church  of  God.'  "  ^ 

Hellenism  and  Judaism  in  Paul 

The  way  may  seem  far  from  the  Apostle  Paul  to 
Matthew  Arnold,  but  in  their  very  different  ways  they 
were  both  engaged  in  the  same  never-ending  task.  They 
were  both  defending  a  gospel  which  was  to  the  Jews  a 
stumbling-block  and  to  the  Greeks  foolishness,  but  which 
was  intended  to  lead  to  a  method  of  life  involving  the 
reconciliation  of  Hebraism  and  Hellenism  while  preserving 
the  one  from  Hellenisticism  and  the  other  from  Pharisaism. 
In  that  struggle  is  to  be  found  the  spiritual  significance 
of  Paul,  and  Matthew  Arnold  is  the  best  witness  to  its 
permanence.     The  analysis  may  be  crude  and  incomplete, 

1  Matthew  Arnold,  Si.  Paul  and  Protestantism  (popular  edition,  London, 
1888),  pp.  I,  2,  80. 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  237 

nevertheless  it  is  true  that  the  main  values  of  modern 
life  are  to  be  traced  back  to  the  messages  of  Greece  and 
Palestine — the  struggle  between  them  and  the  many 
attempts  to  reconcile  them  in  the  individual  and  social 
life.  Paul  was  the  first  (unless  Philo  of  Alexandria  be 
accounted  worthy  to  stand  by  his  side)  to  realize  and  to 
face  the  problem  in  any  comprehensive  way  as  well  as 
to  do  any  sort  of  justice  to  some  elements  at  least  in  both. 
He  did  attempt  to  combine  the  freedom  of  Greece  with 
the  ethical  emphasis  of  the  Jew  into  a  great  ideal  of  a 
free  moral  personality  as  the  end  and  aim  of  all  his  efforts. 
He  at  least  attempted  to  pour  the  energies  of  the  divine 
community  of  Israel  and  the  comprehension  of  the 
philosophic  republic  of  Greece  into  a  new  universalism 
which  was  to  take  shape  in  a  world-wide  Christian 
Church. 

It  is  in  these  two  things — the  emphasis  on  the  freedom 
and  independence  of  the  moral  personality  and  his  emphasis 
on  the  solidarity  of  the  race  '  in  Christ  ' — that  we  find 
the  permanent  value  of  Paul,  and  also  his  peculiar  touch 
with  modern  needs  and  interests.  A  thorough  study  of 
him  in  the  light  of  these  two  great  ends  has  an  abiding 
value. 

Paul's  Two  Great  Aims 

For  these  two  ends  he  is  almost  a  fanatical  enthusiast 
with  an  almost  unearthly  strain  of  reckless  abandon  to 
his  cause,  ready  to  pay  almost  any  price  for  its  success 
— ^in  aches  and  pains  of  body,  in  the  travail  of  his  soul 
and  even  in  a  tattered  reputation — giving  continually 
of  his  best  and  truest  to  it,  without  money  and  without 
price  and  without  thanks,  at  the  sacrifice  of  comfort, 
home,  friends  and  people. 

This  capacity  for  unstinted  devotion  to  such  causes 
is  directly  due  to  the  fact  that  he  looks  upon  his  task  as 
almost  exclusively  a  religious  one.  He  is,  indeed,  a  typical 
example  of  an  intensely  religious  personality — God- 
haunted  and  God-subdued — and  of  what  such  a  personality 
can  accomplish  among  men.  His  personal  experience  of 
religion  was  a  classical  one.  It  is  still  the  clearest  and 
most    characteristic   example    of   one    of   the    two   most 


238    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

important  types  of  the  specifically  Christian  experience 
and  faith.  It  was  characteristic  of  him  that  this  did 
not  become  a  mere  '  religiosity,'  but  an  intense  passion 
for  righteousness,  a  constant  pressure  upon  his  will.  It 
also  made  an  imperative  call  upon  his  intellect — urging 
him  to  a  more  and  more  thorough  and  comprehensive 
expression  of  his  faith  in  intellectual  terms,  and  to  its 
incorporation  in  the  social  life  of  the  world.  Every  age 
stands  in  need  of  being  kept  in  touch  with  such  men, 
and  to  be  reminded  of  the  fundamental  values  they 
express — and  our  modern  time  perhaps  more  than  any 
other. 

Naturally,  these  permanent  values  in  Paul  are  com- 
bined with  many  elements  merely  temporary  and  passing. 
His  picture  of  the  world,  his  belief  in  angels  and  demons, 
his  views  of  body  and  soul,  and  many  others  of  his  beliefs, 
have  gone  never  to  return,  having  had  their  say  and  done 
their  work.  If  we  judged  Paul  merely  by  his  theological 
method,  whether  in  argument  or  in  the  formulation  of 
his  doctrines,  he  would  remain  for  us  a  figure  of  the  past 
with  whom  we  have  now  very  little  in  common. 

He  himself,  however,  is  none  the  less  a  typical  person- 
ality, and  the  work  he  performed  in  and  through  these 
temporary  forms  is  none  the  less  permanent  in  its  essential 
nature  and  significance. 

The  historical  achievements  of  the  Apostle  Paul  are 
great  and  various,  but  they  do  not  exhaust  his  work. 
In  and  through  the  things  he  said  and  did,  he  left  behind 
him  the  impress  of  a  personality  of  enduring  value — 
greater  than  anything  he  ever  said  or  did. 


4 

PAUL  IN  CHRISTIAN  INSTRUCTION 

Paul  and  Jesus  in  Modern  Instruction 

In  many  ways  it  is  a  difficult  task  to  give  the  Apostle 
Paul  his  own  proper  and  peculiar  place  in  a  system  of 
Christian  instruction  and  education.     He  is  a  much  more 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  239 

complicated  personality  than  Jesus,  was  born  and  worked 
in  a  more  complicated  situation.  The  stamp  of  his  age 
is  seen  more  clearly  and  oftener  upon  his  thought,  work 
and  life.  He  was  called  upon  to  meet  many  practical 
problems  which  were  beyond  the  horizon  of  Jesus.  His 
touch  with  fundamental  human  nature  was  not  so  direct 
and  simple  as  that  of  his  Master. 

The  universalism  of  Jesus,  for  instance,  may  not  be 
so  explicit  in  expression  and  application  as  that  of  the 
Apostle.  It  was,  nevertheless,  quite  as  real.  It  was  more 
effective  in  the  long  run,  because  its  roots  went  down  to 
simpler  and  more  permanent  elements  in  humanity.  He 
found  universal  humanity  in  every  individual  in  his 
relation  to  the  Father.  The  forms  of  Paul's  peculiar 
contribution  to  universalism  are  more  extensive  than 
intensive,  more  cosmopolitan  than  psychological.  He 
reads  humanity  in  terms  of  nations  rather  than  of  in- 
dividual human  nature.  What  Jesus  therefore  gave  to 
the  world  was  a  universal  Gospel,  but  the  special  con- 
tribution of  Paul  was  a  universal  Church  and  a  federation 
of  religious  communities  within  which  the  individual 
personality  must  hold  a  more  or  less  precarious  place. 
Paul  himself,  it  is  true,  made  the  promotion  of  both  his 
aim,  but  even  he  did  not  always  succeed  in  resolving  the 
inevitable  tension  between  them.  The  universalism  of 
Jesus  is  therefore  more  easily  grasped  than  that  of  Paul, 
and  it  also  provides  a  more  central  and  effective  educational 
motive.  In  any  case,  it  is  clear  that  it  is  far  easier  for 
the  modern  world  to  find  points  of  contact  with  the  Gospel 
of  Jesus  than  with  the  Church  of  Paul. 

First  of  all,  too,  it  is  in  the  region  of  the  concrete  and 
varied  application  of  the  Gospel  that  the  educational  value 
of  the  Apostle  Paul  mainly  lies,  whereas  Jesus  brings  us 
in  a  simple  and  direct  way  face  to  face  with  the  spirit  and 
fundamental  principles  of  that  Gospel.  The  latter,  of 
course,  are  also  to  be  found  in  Paul,  but  in  order  to  see 
them  we  have  often  to  thrust  aside  a  mass  of  strange 
material  which  prevents  the  clear  and  direct  revelation 
of  them.  Paul  himself,  and  others  for  him,  have  built 
around  his  central  heart  high  walls  which  are  not  always 
easy  to  scale. 


240    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Paul  a  Difficult  Subject 

The  concreteness  of  his  presentations  in  his  theological 
doctrines,  his  Church  and  his  many  other  definite  applica- 
tions of  the  Christian  faith  are  educationally  deceptive,  as 
the  history  of  Christian  instruction  plainly  shows.  They 
are  fairly  easy  to  transmit  superficially,  but  more  often 
than  not  it  has  been  easier  to  rest  content  with  the  Pauline 
forms  than  to  press  forward  and  inward  beyond  them 
into  the  central  faith  and  Christian  spirit  of  the 
Apostle. 

The  problem,  therefore,  of  teaching  Paul  as  a  real 
element  in  Christian  instruction  and  education  is  no  light 
task,  and  cannot  be  solved  without  a  good  deal  of  hard 
work  and  strenuous  thought. 

In  one  thing  alone  does  Paul  seem  at  first  to  have  an 
advantage  over  Jesus  as  a  teaching  instrument.  We  feel 
that  we  ought  to  know  more  about  him  and  to  know 
him  more  personally  and  directly  than  Jesus.  Though  a 
biography  is  no  more  possible  in  his  case  than  in  that  of 
Jesus,  still  Paul  does  speak  to  us  directly  in  his  own 
letters  as  well  as  through  the  dramatic  story  of  Acts, 
while  we  have  our  knowledge  of  Jesus  only  at  second 
or  even  third  hand. 

This,  however,  does  not  help  us  so  much  as  it  might 
seem  to  do.  It  is  balanced  by  other  and  more  vital  con- 
siderations. The  letters  of  Paul  are,  of  course,  of  vital 
importance  for  our  understanding  of  him,  but  somehow 
or  other,  great  as  their  power  often  is,  they  have  not  in 
them  the  same  power  of  revelation  as  the  material  of  the 
Synoptic  Gospels.  Jesus  even  through  His  reporters  can 
reveal  more  of  Himself  in  a  few  brief  sayings  than  Paul  in 
a  long  letter. 

Generally  speaking,  therefore,  Paul  provides  material 
more  intractable  in  the  hands  of  the  modern  teacher  than 
does  Jesus.  It  is  much  more  complicated  and  needs  more 
manipulation,  because  Paul  is  always  moving  more  towards 
the  circumference  of  the  Christian  Gospel  and  life.  He 
deals  much  more  largely  with  the  particular  concrete  and 
temporary  application  and  expression  of  the  Christian 
Gospel. 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  241 

Paul  nevertheless  Necessary 

This  fact,  however,  though  it  may  set  before  us  a 
difficult  task,  means  that  we  have  all  the  more  need 
of  Paul  alongside  of  Jesus  in  any  complete  scheme  of 
Christian  instruction.  It  is  not  only  that  he  fills  a  large 
place  in  the  New  Testament,  but  he  provides  the  necessary 
complement  to  Jesus  and  His  teaching.  The  practical 
application  of  the  Gospel  under  the  direction  of  the 
Apostle  Paul  is  an  essential  element  in  its  full  presenta- 
tion, and  therefore  in  Christian  instruction,  especially  in 
view  of  our  modern  situation.  We  need  a  much  clearer 
recognition  of  the  fact  that  such  a  comprehensive  and 
devoted  crusade  for  the  incorporation  of  the  Gospel  in  the 
intellectual  convictions  of  men,  in  their  personal  callings 
and  work,  and  in  social  institutions,  is  not  only  a  corollary 
to  it,  but  a  necessary  element  of  the  Gospel  itself.  The 
application  may  change  from  age  to  age,  but  it  is  in  the 
process  that  the  Christian  Gospel  finds  its  reality,  fulness 
and  power. 

It  is,  then,  one  of  our  great  tasks  to  make  the  Pauline 
material  in  the  New  Testament  effective  as  one  of  the 
primary  elements  in  Christian  instruction.  But  before 
we  can  make  this  material  effective  we  must  somehow 
make  the  figure  of  Paul  and  his  work  interesting  in  the 
deeper  sense  to  the  modern  mind  ;  and  in  order  to  make 
him  interesting  we  must  so  far  as  possible  make  him  in- 
teUigible.  Our  task  is  to  promote  and  cultivate  a  better 
and  clearer  understanding  of  Paul  in  order  to  enlist  the 
hearts  and  emotions  of  men  on  his  side  so  that  he  may 
grip  their  will  and  conscience. 


5 

THE   STORY   OF   PAUL'S   LIFE 

Natural  and  Artificial  Difficulties 

As  we  have  seen,  it  is  not  easy  to  make  Paul  intelligible. 
We  have  to  meet  the  natural  difficulties  arising  from  the 
16 

I 


242    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

nature  of  his  personality,  the  course  of  his  education,  the 
character  of  his  moral  and  spiritual  experiences,  the 
complication  of  his  environment,  the  intricate  windings 
of  his  subtle  mind,  the  variety  and  wide  extent  of  his 
activities  as  well  as  the  extraordinary  contradictions 
revealed  in  his  historical  influence  upon  different  types  of 
men  and  their  very  different  reactions  under  his  influence. 
In  addition,  however,  to  such  natural  difficulties  as  these, 
we  have  made  other  difficulties  for  ourselves  by  our 
traditional  methods  of  approaching  and  dealing  with  the 
task  of  teaching  Paul.  We  have  generally  started  from 
the  wrong  end  and  emphasized  the  wrong  side.  Paul,  the 
theologian,  has  loomed  far  too  largely  and  too  early  in  our 
minds  as  teachers,  and  in  our  instruction.  It  is  indeed  a 
matter  of  grave  doubt  whether  a  detailed  study  of  Paul's 
theology  as  such  can  ever  become  an  integral  part  of 
Christian  instruction  at  all  except  in  mature,  select  and 
more  or  less  expert  circles.  The  difficulties  of  making  it 
really  intelligible  and  interesting  are  so  great  as  permanently 
to  stand  in  the  way  of  our  finding  the  simpler  and  more  real 
Paul  who  stands  behind  his  theological  constructions.  At 
any  rate,  if  we  let  the  latter  control  our  approach  to  him 
we  are  quite  likely  to  remain  simply  puzzled  by  them  and 
to  find  the  door  leading  to  the  understanding  and  apprecia- 
tion of  Paul  shut  against  us. 

Traditional  Method  Unsatisfactory 

We  must,  without  doubt,  pluck  up  the  courage,  so  far 
as  all  effective  instruction  is  concerned,  to  break  away 
quite  definitely  and  decisively  from  the  traditional  methods. 
Our  educational  study  of  Paul  must  proceed  on  more 
historical  lines — begin  with  the  dramatic  human  elements 
in  his  life  and  adventures,  go  on  to  describe  him  as  a 
Christian  disciple,  and  try  to  make  him  intelligible  as  a 
Christian  missionary  and  organizer,  selecting  only  so  much 
of  his  letters  and  his  thought  as  may  be  absolutely 
necessary  for  this  purpose.  Then  and  then  only  will 
come  the  time  to  present  him  as  the  creator  of  a 
Christian  Literature,  as  a  theologian  and  in  his  uitiversal 
significance. 


J 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  243 

Once  we  adopt  this  general  attitude  to  our  task,  the 
distribution  of  the  Pauline  material  in  a  progressive 
Christian  instruction  will  not  be  so  difficult. 


The  Story  of  Paul 

It  is  not  much  that  we  can  usefully  employ  in  the 
curriculum  for  childhood.  That  will  probably  consist  of 
some  of  the  more  dramatic  incidents  in  the  life  and  adven- 
tures of  Paul  the  Traveller — selected  and  somewhat  more 
adapted  to  this  age  from  Mr.  Basil  Matthews'  Paul  the 
Dauntless,  and  including  some  justifiable  imaginative 
construction  of  the  early  days  at  Tarsus,  the  scene  at 
the  stoning  of  Stephen,  the  story  of  the  conversion  in  its 
more  external  aspects,  some  of  the  adventures  in  Galatia, 
Ephesus  and  elsewhere,  the  arrest  and  first  trial,  the 
voyage  to  Rome  and  maybe  one  or  two  others.  These 
will  not  amount  to  anything  like  a  life  of  Paul,  but  they 
may  easily  be  strung  together  so  as  to  form  a  more  or 
less  connected  narrative. 

In  early  adolescence  will  come  the  attempt  to  describe 
the  life  and  work  of  Paul  as  a  Christian  man  and  as  a 
Christian  missionary  more  fully  and  more  connectedly. 
For  this  purpose,  the  inspiration  and  guidance  offered  by 
Paul  the  Dauntless  are  invaluable  and  unique.  There  is 
nothing  like  it  in  modern  literature,  and  the  teacher  will 
do  well  to  soak  himself  in  its  spirit  and  method  before  he 
begins  his  task. 

The  merely  wearisome  recital  of  the  three  missionary 
journeys,  with  the  deadly  repetition  of  more  or  less  empty 
names  of  cities  and  countries  stereotyped  for  the  memory, 
has  always  been  a  heavy  burden  for  the  teacher  to  carry 
and  for  the  pupil  to  endure.  Much  more  interesting  and 
much  more  illuminating  would  be  some  attempt  to  make 
Paul's  travels  live  as  pictures  even  if  the  record  of  his 
journeys  be  far  from  complete.  Still  more  to  the  point 
would  be  some  effort  to  distinguish  between  the  experi- 
mental methods  of  the  first  period  in  Cilicia,  Antioch, 
and  the  journey  with  Barnabas,  and  the  later  period 
when  Paul  went  off  on  his  own  lines,  and  the  vision  of  a 
great  imperial  mission  stood  clear  before  him. 


244    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

This  story  of  the  life  of  Paul  should  probably  be 
accompanied  and  illustrated  by  some  appropriate  quota- 
tions from  the  Book  of  Acts  and  the  Epistles  ;  and  also 
by  some  elementary  account  of  the  origin  and  purpose  of 
his  letters — some  two  or  three  of  them  being  selected  as 
examples  in  their  proper  connection. 


6 

THE  WORK  AND  TEACHING  OF  PAUL 

The  Background  of  Paul's  Work  and  Teaching 

Following  this  story  of  Paul  as  a  Christian  man  and 
a  Christian  missionary  would  come  in  middle  and  late 
adolescence  a  study  of  the  work  of  the  Apostle  as  a  whole 
in  relation  to  his  heritage  and  environment,  his  character 
and  personality. 

I .  The  first  part  of  this  task  is  to  provide  the  life, 
thought  and  work  of  Paul  with  its  own  peculiar  back- 
ground. An  attempt  must  be  made  to  give  some  descrip- 
tion of  Judaism  and  Pharisaism,  mainly  as  the  soil  out 
of  which  Paul  grew,  and  partly  as  one  of  the  enemies  he 
had  to  face  in  carrying  out  his  chief  task.  Secondly 
and  on  the  other  hand,  the  Hellenistic  popular  thought 
and  religion  in  the  Roman  Empire  must  also  be  present 
in  the  background,  to  a  certain  extent,  as  one  of  the 
influences  which  moulded  him,  but  more  as  the  power  he 
set  himself  to  conquer  and  subdue  to  the  life  of  the  Gospel. 

There  is  also  a  third  element  which  must  have  its 
place  in  any  introduction  to  the  study  of  Paul,  namely, 
the  Primitive  Church.  He  may  have  had  fleeting  glimpses 
of  Jesus  in  Jerusalem  and  may  once  and  again  have 
listened  to  His  voice,  but  more  often  than  not  the 
Primitive  Church  historically  stands  between  him  and 
the  Master.  To  the  first  disciples  belong  the  earliest 
experiences  of  the  Risen  Jesus,  as  well  as  the  preservation 
of  the  memories  of  His  earthly  life.  It  was  they  also  who 
established  the  first  Christian  community.  Their  signifi- 
cance in  the  New  Testament  is  therefore  twofold.     They 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  245 

preserved  and  mediated  the  direct  and  personal  influences 
of  Jesus  and  also,  both  positively  and  negatively,  prepared 
the  way  for  Paul. 

The  similarities  and  differences  between  Paul  and 
these  three  elements  in  his  heritage  and  environment 
should  be  revealed  fairly  clearly  in  our  study  of  the 
Apostle.  It  was  upon  these  that  he  built,  but  it  was 
these  also  which  he  had  to  fight  on  behalf  of  his  Gospel. 

In  view  of  the  present  state  of  our  knowledge  of 
the  Primitive  Church  as  well  as  of  Judaism  and  of  the 
Hellenistic  religion,  the  teacher  will  not  find  it  an  easy 
task  to  make  this  part  of  his  study  of  Paul  useful  and 
fruitful  educationally. 

Paul's  Personal  Experience 

2.  The  second  element  in  the  discussion  will  be  some 
analysis  of  the  moral  and  spiritual  experiences  of  the 
Apostle,  and  especially  of  his  conversion.  No  one  has 
yet  succeeded  in  making  the  experiences  of  Paul  on  the 
way  to  Damascus  either  historically  or  psychologically 
quite  intelligible.  Probably  there  will  here  always  remain 
a  surd  beyond  our  calculation  and  elements  beyond  our 
control.  But  it  would  be  a  great  service  to  Christian 
instruction  if  only  the  peculiar  character  of  Paul's  ex- 
perience could  be  made  clear  by  comparison  with  other 
classical  instances  of  similar  conversions  like  those  of 
Augustine  and  Luther,  which  involve  in  general  the  same 
type  of  sudden  break  with  the  past  and  a  thoroughgoing 
reconstruction  '  by  the  grace  of  God  '  of  the  whole  life. 

Out  of  these  experiences  sprang  the  great  aims  which 
afterwards  controlled  the  lifelong  activities  of  Paul — the 
ultimate  values  revealed  in  that  life  and  work.  These 
we  have  already  described  generally  as  the  creation  and 
promotion  of  free  moral  personalities  on  the  one  hand  and 
of  a  universal  Christian  community  or  Church  on  the 
other. 

The  Typical  Struggles  of  Paul 

In  the  pursuit  of  these  aims  we  find  Paul  more  and 
more    forced    into    antagonism   and    a    desperate   struggle 


246    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

with  the  legaHsm  of  Judaism  and  the  Primitive  Church 
on  the  one  hand  and  on  the  other  with  the  non-ethical 
paganism  of  the  Hellenistic  world. 

It  is  in  the  emergence  and  development  of  these 
struggles  in  so  definite  and  defined  a  form  that  the  central 
historical  and  permanent  significance  of  the  Apostle  Paul 
for  education  lies  —  the  life-and-death  struggle  of  new 
ideals  for  supremacy  over  the  old,  incorporated  in  con- 
crete forms. 

It  is  essentially  the  same  struggle  as  we  find  in  the 
history  of  all  the  prophetic  figures  of  the  race — in  Luther 
and  Savonarola,  in  Wyclif  and  Hus,  in  the  Hebrew  prophets 
and  in  Jesus,  in  different  forms.  It  might,  in  fact,  be  said 
that  one  of  the  greatest  tasks  of  all  education  is  to  make 
this  struggle  living  to,  and  live  again  in,  the  minds,  hearts 
and  will  of  the  young, 

A  comparative  study  of  some  of  these  outstanding 
personalities  from  this  point  of  view  would  be  one  of  the 
most  significant  contributions  to  spiritual  education,  and 
Paul  has  undoubtedly  his  own  contribution  to  make  for 
this  purpose.  The  struggle  against  Judaism  is  most 
clearly  represented  by  the  letter  to  the  Galatians,  and  the 
struggle  against  Hellenistic  paganism  by  First  Corinthians  ; 
and  these  letters  might  well  be  studied  definitely  in  this 
connection. 

The  Motives  of  Paul's  Theology 

3.  What  will  provide  the  climax  to  the  study  of  these 
struggles — both  positively  and  negatively — and  also  the 
best  introduction  to  the  study  of  Paul's  theology,  as  well 
as  the  best  bridge  between  it  and  his  experience,  is  a 
definite  consideration  of  the  pedagogic  and  apologetic 
elements  in  Paul's  life  and  thought.  Most  of  Paul's 
theological  constructions  spring  directly  out  of  his  needs 
as  a  defender  of  the  faith,  against  its  two  great  enemies, 
and  then  out  of  his  needs  as  an  organizer  and  teacher  of 
his  converts. 

Behind  this  motive  of  the  missionary  teacher  there 
is,  of  course,  the  primary  demand  of  his  own  personal 
experience  of  Christ  and  God  for  intellectual  explanation 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  247 

and  interpretation  upon  a  mind  like  that  of  PauL  From 
this  point  of  view  Paul's  theology  is  an  attempt  to  uni- 
versalize his  own  personal  experience  ;  but  that  experi- 
ence is  not  allowed  freely  to  find  its  own  intellectual 
expression.  In  the  particular  forms  it  takes  it  is  con- 
ditioned now  by  categories  borrowed  from  his  old  Pharisaic 
theology,  and  again  by  influences  from  Hellenistic  thought. 
It  is  conditioned  also  by  the  urgent  need  of  defence  against 
Judaism  on  the  one  hand  and  paganism  on  the  other  ;  and 
finally  also  by  the  more  positive  desire  to  promote  the 
growth  of  the  Christian  life  in  his  converts.  It  is  the 
loose  combination  of  these  more  or  less  divergent  sources 
and  motives  that  explain  the  varied  forms  and  com- 
plexities of  Paul's  theological  constructions. 

Educationally,  it  is  a  far  more  important  task  to  un- 
ravel these  motives  that  led  to  all  the  theologizing  of  Paul 
than  to  study  his  doctrines  in  detail  or  to  attempt  to 
reduce  his  often  occasional  theological  statements  into  a 
consistent  system.  It  is  in  order  to  realize  vividly  the 
force  and  character  of  these  motives  that  we  need  here 
a  definite  study  of  Paul  as  a  missionary  teacher — the 
defender  of  the  faith  against  Jews  and  Greeks  and  the 
faithful  pastor  of  the  flock  of  Christ. 


THE  ETHICS,  THEOLOGY  AND  RELIGION  OF 

PAUL 

From  all  this  we  can  then  proceed  more  hopefully  to 
a  special  study  of  Paul's  Ethics  and  Theology,  and  in  the 
end  come  back  through  them  once  more  to  that  funda- 
mental religious  faith  which  he  shared  with  Jesus  Christ 
and  found  also  in  Him  completely  incorporated  and  made 
*  the  power  of  God  unto  salvation,' 

Paul's  Ethical  Teaching 

I .  In  order  to  avoid  any  danger  of  misinterpreting 
Paul's  theology,  it  is  just  as  well  first  of  all  to  emphasize 


248    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

his  intense  moral  earnestness  and  teaching.  Not  that  we 
can  speak  of  ethics  in  any  technical  sense  or  of  ethical 
theories  in  connection  with  Paul,  but  we  need  to  be  sure 
that  his  full  message  is  not  only  an  intellectual  formulation 
of  the  Christian  experience,  but  also  a  definite  application 
of  the  Gospel  to  the  life  of  the  will,  both  in  the  activities 
of  the  personal  life  and  in  social  relations. 

The  ethical  imperative  is  as  much  a  reality  to  Paul  as 
it  was  to  Jesus.  The  moral  sense  of  responsibility,  the 
energy  of  the  will  to  struggle  and  to  work  were  not 
paralysed  by  his  trust  in  God,  his  profound  experience 
of  the  free  grace  of  the  Father,  and  his  sense  of  the  absolute 
sovereignty  of  the  divine  will.  It  was  only  stimulated 
by  them  to  achieve  greater  ethical  triumphs  than  ever 
before.  For  him  as  for  Jesus,  the  primary  incarnation  and 
application  of  religion  was  in  a  sturdy  morality  of  personal 
life,  and  the  main  qualities  of  the  personal,  ethical  ideal 
which  thus  issues  out  of  Christian  faith  are  love,  sincerity, 
simplicity,  freedom  and  independence,  purity,  loyalty  and 
gratitude. 

Nor  does  Paul  fail  to  meet  many  of  the  problems  of 
the  social  life  as  they  emerge  one  by  one  in  the  experience 
of  himself  and  his  converts.  Neither  a  politician  nor  a 
social  reformer  in  the  narrow  sense,  yet  he  does  devote  a 
great  deal  of  attention  to  the  most  important  social 
institutions — to  marriage  and  the  family,  nationality  and 
the  State.  He  may  have  been  mistaken  in  his  judgment 
with  regard  to  the  proper  Christian  attitude  towards 
slavery,  marriage,  the  place  of  women  or  the  Roman 
State,  but  for  him  as  for  Jesus,  love,  which  includes  active, 
unselfish  service  as  its  first  element,  was  the  root-principle 
of  the  Christian  life,  and  he  took  it  seriously  and  applied 
it  intelligently. 

More  than  all  in  this  connection,  it  must  not  be  for- 
gotten that  Paul  was  the  effective  creator  of  the  Christian 
Church — the  greatest  social  institution  in  the  history  of 
the  world.  He  has  a  clear  vision  of  its  social  significance, 
and  it  becomes  under  his  hand  the  germinating  ground 
of  a  new  world.  In  it  there  is  neither  bond  nor  free, 
neither  rich  nor  poor,  neither  male  nor  female.  It  is  a 
democracy  of  equals,  each  with  his  own  work  and  function 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  249 

according  to  the  grace  which  God  has  given  him,  and  all 
living  together  as  brothers  in  the  peace  and  happiness 
that  can  come  only  from  willing  co-operation  in  unselfish 
service  and  good  deeds.  He  may  not  have  been  always 
faithful  to  his  principles,  but  his  ideal  of  the  Church, 
its  life  and  its  tasks,  is  a  social  contribution  of  supreme 
value  to  the  world. 

2.  We  cannot  here  enter  upon  anything  like  a  sketch 
of  Paul's  theology,  but  must  be  content  with  suggesting 
the  main  lines  upon  which  a  study  of  it  for  educational 
purposes  should  run.  It  certainly  ought,  first  of  all,  to 
be  studied  in  close  relation  to  his  work  as  a  missionary, 
a  teacher  and  apologist. 

Theological  Framework 

For  these  purposes  he  succeeded  in  putting  his  message 
into  a  form — more  or  less  metaphysical — which  reads 
like  a  complete,  finished,  concrete,  simple  and  clear  story 
so  far  as  its  fundamental  outline  is  concerned.  It  runs 
as  follows  : 

Christ,  the  Son  of  God,  a  superhuman,  heavenly, 
Divine  Being,  in  willing  obedience  to  God  the  Father's 
behest  came  down  from  heaven  in  the  fulness  of  time, 
was  made  man,  and  through  His  death  and  resurrection 
was  "  exalted  to  the  right  hand  of  God."  By  this  means 
He  has  redeemed  those  who  believe  in  Him  from  the 
flesh  and  sin,  the  law,  death  and  Satan,  and  has  thus 
brought  to  them  the  salvation  of  God  of  which  the  holy 
influence  and  working  of  the  Holy  Spirit  of  God  and  of 
Christ  is  the  guarantee  here  and  now. 

Under  the  presuppositions  of  that  age  it  is  a  simple 
and  a  clear  story,  however  strange  it  may  sound  to  our 
modern  ears.  It  was  one  of  Paul's  educational  triumphs 
to  have  formulated  such  a  story,  and  not  the  least  of  its 
merits  for  its  time  was  its  mythological  character.  To 
us  it  may  not  be  so  simple  as  it  looks,  for  we  have  left 
the  whole  universe  in  which  it  moves  far  behind  us  ; 
but  the  people  of  the  time  questioned  the  possibility  and 
probability  of  no  word  of  it.  To  them  the  actors  were 
all  real,  and  the  means  adopted  were  all  perfectly  natural. 


250    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

In  its  separate  elements  it  was  no  new  theology  created 
by  Paul.  Pagan  thought  was  already  familiar  with 
divine  beings  who  came  down  to  earth,  while  the  death 
and  resurrection  of  these  divine  beings  were  not  strange 
to  them.  Already,  also,  the  Primitive  Church  had  its  pre- 
existent  Christ,  and  they  had  seen  in  the  Cross  and  Resur- 
rection their  redemption.  They  knew  the  Holy  Spirit, 
and  in  His  marvellous  working  had  found  the  earnest 
of  their  full  salvation.  What  Paul  did  was  to  universalize 
their  Christ,  to  set  the  Cross  defiantly  and  triumphantly 
in  the  centre  of  the  picture,  to  gather  together  the  scattered 
elements  of  their  beliefs  into  one  complete  and  coherent 
drama  of  salvation,  to  enunciate  it  clearly,  to  proclaim 
it  as  something  new  and  independent  of  Judaism,  as  well 
as  to  defend  it  vigorously  against  all  attacks  and  to 
justify  it  with  all  the  strength  and  subtlety  of  his  specu- 
lative intellect. 

Three  Main  Lines  of  Thought 

We  do  not,  however,  find  in  the  Epistles  of  Paul  any 
complete  and  unified  system  of  theological  doctrines 
elaborating  this  outline  and  framework,  and  covering 
systematically  all  its  details.  What  we  do  find  is  that 
his  mind  seems,  as  a  result  of  his  needs  as  a  missionary, 
to  have  been  working  in  three  different  directions  which 
correspond  to  three  aspects  of  his  life  and  work.  There  is, 
firstly,  an  Anti- Jewish  Apologetic.  Secondly,  there  are 
the  elements  of  a  theology  designed  to  support  his  Gentile 
Mission  and  to  overcome  paganism.  Thirdly,  there  are 
in  his  letters  numerous  traces  of  a  more  or  less  original 
and  independent  theology  which  springs  more  directly 
out  of  his  Christian  experience  and  that  of  his  converts. 

These  three  cycles  of  thought  are  constantly  over- 
lapping one  another  in  Paul's  letters,  and  it  is  impossible 
to  weld  them  together  into  one  consistent  system.  That 
may,  however,  only  be  due  to  the  fragmentary  character 
of  the  letters  as  compared  with  Paul's  own  mind.  So 
we  must  be  content  with  giving  a  brief  description  of 
each  one  separately,  so  far  as  we  can  trace  their  character 
through    scattered    and    occasional    references    and    dis- 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  251 

cussions  in  Paul's  letters.  That  seems  to  be  the  only  way 
in  which  we  can  make  them  of  real  educational  value, 
and  the  only  way  by  which  we  can  arrive  at  some  under- 
standing and  appreciation  of  the  practical  meaning  of 
Paul's  theological  thinking. 

The  Anti-Jewish  Apologetic 

(a)  The  first  line  of  thought  was  intended  to  meet 
Judaism,  to  defend  and  to  justify  the  independence  and 
superiority  of  the  Gospel  against  Jewish  attacks.  This 
Anti-Jewish  Apology  is  mainly  concerned  with  the  means 
of  salvation,  and  discusses  the  relation  between  faith  and 
law,  works  and  grace,  the  Old  Testament  and  the  Law, 
bringing  out  the  great  contrasts  between  the  new  and  the 
old  religion.  It  uses  the  Jewish  terms  and  ideas  of  the 
Christ,  law,  justification,  sacrifice  and  propitiation,  to 
interpret  the  personality  and  work  of  Jesus,  to  explain 
the  character  of  His  death  and  to  describe  the  means  and 
method  of  salvation.  It  starts  with  the  dogma  of  the 
corruption  of  human  nature  and  the  inability  of  man  to 
fulfil  the  whole  law.  It  proceeds  to  the  doctrines  of  the 
complete  obedience  to  the  demands  of  the  law  in  the 
life  of  Christ,  His  death  as  the  complete  and  final  sacrifice 
for  sin  as  well  as  the  full  satisfaction  of  the  law,  making 
the  whole  system  of  Jewish  sacrifices  useless.  His  Resur- 
rection proving  the  acceptance  of  that  sacrifice  by  God. 
This  line  of  thought  finally  issues  in  the  doctrine  of 
Justification  by  Faith  and  closes  with  eschatological 
doctrines  of  the  final  salvation  in  the  Kingdom  of  God 
ushered  in  by  the  Parousia  of  Christ,  the  Last  Judgment, 
and  the  Resurrection  of  the  just,  clothed  in  *  spiritual 
bodies.' 

The  Anti-Pagan  Theology 

(b)  The  second  line  of  thought  goes  out  to  meet  the 
Gentiles  and  supports  the  appeal  of  Paul's  great  mission 
to  the  Greek,  Latin  and  Oriental  pagan  world.  It  uses 
Greek  and  Pagan  terms  and  ideas  of  the  Logos,  incar- 
nation, the  dying  and  rising  again  of  divine  Saviours,  fear 


252    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

and  dread  of  the  world  of  demons,  salvation  and  re- 
dernption  through  a  mystico-physical  union  with  the 
divine  by  baptism,  common  sacrificial  meals  and  other 
sacramental  mystery-rites,  as  well  as  the  idea  of  the  con- 
tradiction and  universal  struggle  between  the  flesh  and 
the  spirit  combined  with  the  belief  in  the  immortality 
of  the  spirit  when  released  from  the  bonds  of  the  flesh. 
These  terms  and  ideas  are  used  in  order  to  interpret  to 
the  pagan  mind  the  personality  and  work  of  Jesus  Christ 
as  well  as  the  method  of  salvation  through  Him.  This 
line  of  thought  also  starts  from  the  dogma  of  the  cor- 
ruption of  human  nature,  its  sins  in  this  case  being 
against  the  law  of  conscience  ;  it  proceeds  to  interpret 
the  heathen  gods  as  demons,  from  the  evil  power  of  whom 
men  need  deliverance  ;  or  as  mere  images  weak  and  in- 
effective. It  sketches  a  doctrine  of  Christ  as  the  Lord 
who  is  the  incarnation  of  the  Son  of  God  in  flesh  to  pro- 
cure full  and  final  redemption  from  the  curse  and  power  of 
the  flesh,  the  death  and  resurrection  as  the  triumph  of  the 
spirit  over  the  flesh  or  as  the  conquest  over  the  world  of 
evil  demons.  This  the  Son  accomplishes  in  a  repre- 
sentative capacity  for  the  race  of  men,  thereby  winning  for 
Himself  a  place  "  far  above  all  rule  and  authority  and 
every  name  that  is  named,  not  only  in  this  world  but  also 
in  that  which  is  to  come."  This  redemption  from  the 
flesh  and  from  the  power  of  demons  may  be  shared  by  all 
men  through  faith,  which  has  here  a  tendency  to  become  a 
belief  in  this  series  of  '  evangelic  facts  '  as  well  as  trust  in 
the  Son  of  God.  The  salvation  becomes  the  actual  pos- 
session of  the  believer  by  the  mystic  sharing  of  Christ's 
death  and  resurrection  which  finds  its  expression  in  a 
sacramentarian  doctrine  of  the  Church,  Baptism  and  the 
Lord's  Supper. 

It  is  not  meant  that  these  two  lines  of  thought  are  to 
be  found  in  the  writings  of  Paul  separately  and  indepen- 
dently drawn.  What  is  fairly  clear  is  that  the  unsyste- 
matic theological  thinking  of  the  Apostle  for  apologetic 
and  missionary  purposes  ran  on  both  these  lines,  now 
on  one,  now  on  the  other.  They  cross  and  recross  each 
other  at  many  points,  while  they  run  parallel  to  each 
other    in    many    places.     They    find    their    unity    in    the 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  253 

common  purpose  which  they  serve  and  in  the  simple 
theological  outline  of  the  history  of  God  bringing  salva- 
tion to  the  world  of  men  through  the  Cross — the  outline 
which  lies  behind  them  both.  The  individual  doctrines 
elaborated  in  both  are  only  temporary  expedients,  because 
in  both  Paul  is  evidently  making  experimental  attempts 
to  solve  the  intellectual  problems  of  the  new  religion 
either  under  the  pressure  of  opposition  or  the  urgency  of 
his  mission. 


The  Theology  of  the  Spirit 

(c)  There  is,  however,  a  third  line  of  thought  running 
all  through  Paul's  letters  which  seems  to  bring  us  much 
nearer  to  the  heart  of  the  Apostle's  thinking  than  either 
of  those  we  have  mentioned.  Both  in  expression  and 
content,  it  is  much  more  nearly  the  spontaneous  and  un- 
fettered result  of  his  own  independent  thinking,  and 
it  seems  to  have  grown  much  more  directly  out  of  the 
fulness  of  his  specific  Christian  experience.  It  is  more 
ethical  and  universal  in  its  terms  and  categories.  It  has 
many  connecting  links  with  both  the  Anti-Jewish  Apolo- 
getic and  the  Mission-theology  of  the  Apostle.  It  is  not 
worked  out  to  such  an  extent  as  they  are,  and  it  might 
perhaps  be  more  properly  called  the  germinal  principles  of 
a  theology  rather  than  a  theology  in  itself.  Instead  of 
being  an  exploitation  of  traditional  and  sometimes  worn- 
out  Jewish  and  Pagan  ideas,  it  brings  for  the  interpreta- 
tion of  the  Christian  experience  comparatively  fresh  and 
unexplored  conceptions  which  still  have  the  promise  of 
life  in  them. 

In  this  third  attempt,  Paul  starts  from  his  own  ex- 
perience of  the  origin  and  growth  of  the  new  life  in  him. 
It  is  a  new  life  of  the  Spirit.  He  knows  and  interprets  it 
as  the  influence  and  power — the  dealing  of  the  Spirit 
of  Jesus  Christ  and  of  the  Spirit  of  God  with  his  soul. 
In  this  experience  '  the  Lord  is  the  Spirit.'  The  first 
principle  of  this  third  expression  of  his  message  is  there- 
fore the  equation  and  identification  of  Jesus  Christ  with 
the  Holy  Spirit  of  God,  and  it  proceeds  to  the  equation 
of  the  working  of  that  Spirit  with  the  whole  realm  of 


254    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

moral  character,  activity  and  aspiration.  The  whole  of 
the  new  hfe  is  the  hfe  '  in  Christ  '  or  '  in  the  Spirit.'  "  It  is 
no  longer  I  that  live,  but  Christ  liveth  in  me."  Funda- 
mentally, the  meaning  which  Paul  puts  into  these  terms 
is  not  a  mystical  but  an  ethical  one.  The  union  with  the 
Spirit  or  with  Christ  is  first  of  all  moral  and  not '  meta- 
physical. The  Cross  becomes  the  central  moral  principle 
of  the  universe — that  of  love's  sacrifice — and  '  dying  with 
Christ  '  is  given  a  moral  instead  of  a  mystical  interpreta- 
tion. It  is  an  ethical  life-union  which  comes  by  faith  as 
the  active  and  trustful  surrender  to  the  guidance  of  the 
Spirit . 

These  terms  and  ideas  may  have  historical  associa- 
tions— both  Pagan  and  Jewish — but  as  a  whole  they  show 
an  original  and  independent  attempt  to  create  a  Christian 
theology  directly  out  of  verifiable  elements  in  Christian 
experience.  Jesus  the  Holy  Spirit  is  far  more  nearly  the 
direct  formulation  of  the  Pauline  experience  than  either 
Jesus  the  Christ  or  Jesus  the  Son  of  God. 

Traces  of  these  conceptions  are  to  be  found  all  through 
Paul's  letters  and  in  connection  with  most  of  his  theo- 
logical doctrines,  including  his  so-called  mystical  and 
sacramentarian  doctrines  of  the  Church,  the  Lord's  Supper 
and  Baptism.  They  are  the  most  genuine  and  the  most 
spontaneous  production  of  Paul's  life  and  thought — the 
most  original  and  most  fruitful  contribution  made  by  him 
to  the  intellectual  expression  and  application  of  the 
Christian  experience  and  Gospel. 

Central  Doctrine  of  Paul 

These  three  cycles  of  thought  have  the  same  meta- 
physical background,  namely,  the  eternal  will  of  God, 
the  world  of  spirits,  good  and  evil,  a  pessimistic  view  of 
human  nature,  the  two  worlds  of  flesh  and  spirit  and  the 
same  eschatology. 

More  than  all,  the  central  doctrine  of  all  three  is  that 
of  the  Person  and  Work  of  Christ  in  its  various  forms. 
Christ  and  the  Cross  are  the  great  symbols  in  all  three. 
Interpreted  in  terms  of  legalism  and  sacrifice,  they  are 
the    means    of    salvation    in    the    Anti- Jewish    Theology. 


THE  APOSTLE  PAUL  AND  HIS  LETTERS  255 

Interpreted  in  terms  of  pagan  sacrifices  and  sacramental 
mysticism,  they  are  the  method  of  salvation  in  the 
Mission-Theology,  while  they  are  interpreted  in  moral 
and  spiritual  terms  in  the  Spirit-Theology  and  describe 
the  character  of  its  salvation. 

It  is  evident  that  Paul  saw  very  clearly  that  the  supreme 
task  of  any  and  every  Christian  Theology  is  to  interpret 
the  Cross  and  the  Christ,  the  Son  of  God  and  the  Spirit 
behind  them. 

3.  We  cannot,  however,  be  satisfied  with  even  all  this 
as  a  full  and  satisfactory  account  of  Paul's  presentation 
of  Christ.  In  Paul's  letters  we  can  still  see  and  feel 
behind  the  theological  story  the  moral  and  religious 
appreciation  of  Christ  which  gave  the  breath  of  life  to  it. 
Behind  both  there  stands  the  historical  figure  of  Jesus, 
though  the  details  of  the  earthly  life  are  not  much  used, 
but  often  overshadowed  and  hidden  in  the  actual  structure 
of  the  theology  by  the  more  comprehensive  theories  of 
the  Heavenly  Christ  and  the  Son  of  God. 

The  Religion  of  Paul 

Paul  may  not  himself  have  distinguished  between  the 
two,  but  that  does  not  alter  the  fact  that  the  spiritual 
energy  of  his  personal  religion  can  still  be  felt  and  recog- 
nized behind  and  between  the  lines  of  the  theological 
story — in  the  spiritual  content  with  which  it  is  filled,  in 
the  character  of  God  it  implies,  the  Christ  it  celebrates 
and  the  salvation  it  promises. 

The  essential  character  of  this  religion  shines  through 
the  theological  formulations  everywhere. 

It  is  the  Gospel  of  God  as  the  Father  of  grace  and 
love,  revealed  in  and  through  Jesus  Christ.  It  is  the 
faith  which  throws  itself  in  utter  trust  upon  that  almighty, 
gracious  will  of  w^hich  Christ  is  the  type  and  power.  It 
is  the  experience  of  forgiveness,  reconciliation,  peace  and 
joy  which  grows  out  of  that  faith.  It  is  the  overpowering 
life  of  ministering  love  which  expresses  that  faith  in  all 
the  multitudinous  relations  of  human  society.  It  is  the 
hope  by  which  that  life  is  sustained  and  strengthened. 
It  is  the  feeling  or  knowledge  that  all  this  has  been  and 


256    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

is  being  paid  for  by  God  Himself  in  Christ.  In  a  word, 
it  is  the  actual  experience  of  salvation  already  obtained 
in  principle  by  union  with  the  Spirit  of  Jesus  Christ. 

Such  were  the  main  features  and  character  of  the 
message  of  Paul.  Both  as  religion  and  as  theology  it  is 
dominated  in  every  part  by  the  figure  of  Jesus  Christ. 
He  is  the  instrument  and  means  of  salvation.  He  is  its 
method,  and  He  is  the  salvation  itself.  It  is  the  Christ- 
faith  which  created  the  whole  scheme  ;  it  is  the  Christ- 
love  which  applied  it  ;  it  is  the  Christ-hope  which  sus- 
tained it.  All  its  power  is  from  Him  and  in  Him  and 
for  Him.  As  a  whole  it  is  the  greatest  tribute  which 
has  yet  been  paid  to  Christ's  sovereignty  over  human 
souls. 

BOOKS 

In  addition  to  the  few  books  here  mentioned,  there  is  rich  material 
for  the  general  study  of  Paul,  and  this  list  represents  only  a 
few  of  the  most  useful  studies  for  the  teacher. 

Cone   (Orello). — Paul   the   Man,   the   Missionary   and   the    Teacher. 

(London,  1898.) 
Deissmann  (A.). — St.  Paul  :  A  Study  in  Social  and  Religious  History. 

(London,  191 2.) 
DoDD  (C.  H,). — The  Meaning  of  Paul  for  To-day.     (London,  1920.) 
Gardner  (P.). — The  Religious  Experience  of  St.  Paul.     (London,  191 1.) 
Jones  (Maurice). — St.  Paul  the  Orator.     (London,  1910.) 
Mathers  (James). — The  Master  Builder.     (S.C.M.,  1920.) 
Morgan    (W.). — The    Religion    and    Theology    of  Paul.     (Edinburgh, 

1917.) 
Ramsay    (W.   M.). — St.   Paul    the   Traveller  and  the  Roman   Citizen. 

(London,   1895.)     The  Cities  of  St.  Paul.     (London,  1907.)     The 

Teaching  of  Paul  in  Terms  of  the  Present  Day.     (London,  191 3.) 
Schweitzer  (A.). — Paul  and  his  Interpreters.     (London,  191 2.) 
Weinel  (H.). — St.  Paul,  the  Man  and  his  Work.     (London,  1906.) 

In  the  following  the  material  is  put  in  Lesson  or  Story  form  : 

Franks  (R.  S.). — The  Life  and  Writings  of  Paul,  vols.  v.  and  vi.  of 
Bible  Notes.     (Woodbrooke  Committee,  Croydon,  1910.) 

Matthews  (Basil). — Paul  the  Dauntless.     (London,  191 8.) 

Stevenson  (J.  G.). — The  Children's  Paul.  (London  :  J.  Clarke  & 
Co.) 

Wood  (Eleanor). — The  Life  and  Ministry  of  Paul  the  Apostle.  (London, 
1912.) 


CHAPTER  XIII 

THE   JOHANNINE   LITERATURE,    THOUGHT  AND   LIFE 

The     Johannine     Problem. — The     Nature    of     the    Problem — The 

Strength  of  Traditional  Views — Significance  of  the  Discussion 

for  the  Teacher — The  Main  Issue. 
The  Origin  and  Purpose  of  the  Fourth  Gospel. — Date  and  Origin  of 

the  Gospel — Its  General  Nature — The  Features  of  the  Time — 

The  Complex  Motives  of  the  Gospel. 
Content  and  Character  of  the  Gospel. — Philosophy  and  Theology  of 

the  Gospel — Historical  and  Religious  Elements — The  Main  Ideas 

of  the  Gospel. 
The   Value  of  the  Fourth  Gospel. — Its  Historical  Significance — Its 

Abiding  Value. 
The    Fourth    Gospel   in    Modern    Instruction. — The    Difi&culties    of 

Teaching    the    Gospel — It    must    be   taught   as   a   Whole — Its 

Allegorical  Character — Other  Difficult  Features. 
The  Fourth  Gospel  in  Childhood. — Its  Summary  Statements  of  Truth 

— The  Historical  Fragments  in  it. 
The  Background  of  the  Johannine  Gospel. — Preparatory  Studies — 

The  Historical  and  Religious  Background — The  Doctrine  of  the 

Logos — The  Terminology  of  the  Mystery-Religions. 
The  Fourth  Gospel   in   Christian   Education. — The  Johannine   Life 

and  Thought  as  a  Permanent  Type — Its  Modem  Value  for  the 

Full  Growth  of  the  Common  Christian  Experience  and  Life. 


I 

THE  JOHANNINE  PROBLEM 

The  third  main  section  of  the  New  Testament,  re- 
veahng  the  third  typical  presentation  of  Christ  in  the 
Hfe  and  writings  of  the  early  Christians,  consists  of 
what  is  known  as  the  Johannine  literature,  including 
the  Fourth  Gospel,  the  Epistles  of  John  and  the 
Apocalypse. 

17 


258    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

The  Nature  of  the  Problem 

It  is  universally  recognized  that  this  literature  brings 
before  us  a  series  of  the  most  complicated  problems 
associated  with  the  history  of  early  Christianity.  With 
these  problems  we  are  here  concerned  only  in  so  far  as 
they  are  concentrated  upon  the  Fourth  Gospel  and  affect 
the  permanent  value  of  that  Gospel,  its  place  in  the 
understanding  and  appreciation  of  the  New  Testament, 
its  effective  use  in  Christian  preaching  and  teaching,  and 
its  valuation  as  an  element  in  the  process  of  modern 
Christian  education. 

The  teacher  will  find  it  very  difficult  to  thread  his 
way  intelligently  through  the  maze  of  the  English  dis- 
cussions of  the  Johannine  problems  from  Westcott  down 
through  Drummond,  and  Sanday  to  Bacon,  Scott  and 
Gardner.  It  has  always  been  recognized  that  '  John  ' 
represents  in  some  way  the  ripest  fruit  of  early  Christian 
life  and  thought.  Clement  of  Alexandria,  at  the  end  of 
the  second  century,  called  it  the  '  spiritual  '  Gospel  as 
compared  with  the  other  three.  Luther,  in  the  sixteenth 
century,  ranked  it  far  above  the  others  in  value,  while 
almost  all  modern  writers  share  the  traditional  view  in 
this  respect. 

The  Strength  of  Traditional  Views 

Up  till  very  recently  also,  *  John  '  has  been  almost 
from  the  begmning  universally  identified  with  the  Apostle, 
the  son  of  Zebedee,  and  that  view  is  still  clung  to  very 
tenaciously — in  form  at  least — by  most  English  writers. 
In  no  case  has  it  been  so  difficult  for  modern  criticism  to 
make  any  real  headway  against  traditional  views.  It  is 
true  that  Dr.  Sanday  has  made  concession  after  con- 
cession to  German  theories.  It  is  true  also  that  in  some 
form  or  other  almost  every  outstanding  English  scholar 
expresses  the  view  that  the  Fourth  Gospel  must  not  be 
dealt  with  in  the  same  way  as  the  Synoptics.  It  is  always 
affirmed  in  words  that  we  must  depend  upon  the  latter 
for  the  historical  facts  about  Jesus.  In  practice,  however, 
the  result  is  largely  the  same,  namely,  that  the  final  appeal 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    259 

is  almost  always  made  to  the  record  of  '  John.'  It  is  a 
significant  fact  that  no  commentary  of  any  independent 
value  has  been  written  in  English  since  the  epoch-making 
one  by  Westcott  in  1869.  He  seems  to  have  delivered 
the  final  verdict  upon  the  Fourth  Gospel  from  the  tradi- 
tional point  of  view.  There  has  not  yet  been  any  serious 
attempt  at  an  English  commentary  on  *  John  '  written 
definitely  and  consistently  from  the  modern  standpoint. 

Significance  of  Discussion  for  the  Teacher 

The  whole  situation  is  very  unsatisfactory  and  con- 
fusing for  the  practical  teacher  of  the  New  Testament, 
while  the  usual  method  of  procedure  has  had  a  deaden- 
ing effect  upon  New  Testament  study  as  a  whole  in  this 
country.  So  long  as  the  essential  character,  origin  and 
purpose  of  the  Fourth  Gospel  remain  in  doubt,  the  pro- 
gressive study  of  every  other  part  of  the  New  Testa- 
ment remains  precarious.  From  the  teacher's  point 
of  view  at  least,  the  mere  question  of  authorship  has 
loomed  far  too  largely  in  all  Johannine  discussion.  He  is 
not  greatly  concerned  whether  the  author  is  to  be  called 
John  the  Apostle,  or  John  the  Presbyter,  or  merely  '  John,' 
or  no  John  at  all.  Unless  it  be  really  true  that  John 
the  Apostle  was  martyred  at  Jerusalem  soon  after  the 
death  of  Jesus,  there  is  no  reason  why  he  should  not  have 
written  a  great  theological  and  philosophical  discussion 
on  the  significance  of  the  Person  of  Christ  towards  the 
end  of  the  first  century.  Nor  is  there  any  conclusive 
reason  why  some  other  disciple  of  Jesus  at  the  beginning 
of  the  second  century  should  not  have  produced  a  fairly 
reliable  historical  account  of  his  Master.  It  may  be  that 
the  probabilities  are  not  in  favour  of  either  supposition. 
Still,  the  weight  of  these  probabilities  depends  upon  the 
definite  results  of  our  study  of  the  Fourth  Gospel  itself  in 
its  content,  nature  and  purpose. 

This  is  the  main  issue  so  far  as  the  Christian  educator 
is  concerned.  He  reads  this  Gospel  and  finds  it  full  of 
apparently  contradictory  elements,  and  he  asks  how  best 
he  can  understand  and  make  intelligible  this  combination 
of   opposites.     What   was   its   value   for   its   own   time  ? 


26o    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

What  contribution  can  it  make  to  ours  ?  How  can  he 
make  effective  use  of  it  in  preaching  and  teaching  the 
Gospel?  These  are  the  ultimate  Johannine  problems. 
They  are  largely  independent  of  questions  of  authorship. 

The  Main  Issue 

If  the  value  of  the  Gospel  is  great  in  itself,  then  it  is 
a  matter  of  no  consequence  who  was  the  author  except 
for  the  fact  that  he  wrote  it.  If  small,  it  is  made  no 
greater  by  postulating  its  apostolic  origin.  Upon  this 
main  issue  the  teacher  must  come  to  some  definite  con- 
clusion before  he  can  even  start  dealing  with  the  Fourth 
Gospel  as  material  for  instruction.  If  the  Gospel  is  meant 
to  be  an  historical  account  of  Jesus,  then  it  must  be  either 
of  very  little  value  to  him  or  it  becomes  the  standard  for 
testing  all  other  accounts.  Its  nature  and  the  differences 
between  it  and  Mark,  for  instance,  are  such  that  it  is 
surely  a  vain  thing  to  imagine  that  it  can  be  used  to 
supplement  or  to  correct  the  Synoptic  material.  Its 
outline  and  character  must  become  the  basis  of  our  his- 
torical life  of  Jesus. 

If,  on  the  other  hand,  the  Gospel  was  from  the  first 
meant  to  be  a  religious  and  theological  interpretation  of 
the  Person  of  Christ,  then  it  is  again  a  vain  thing  to  think 
that  it  can  be  studied  and  interpreted  except  as  such  and 
therefore  as  a  whole.  Then  the  attempt  to  use  any  con- 
siderable parts  of  it  in  teaching  the  historical  life  of  Jesus 
can  only  result  in  confusing  the  clear  pictures  derived  from 
the  first  three  Gospels  and  doing  an  injustice  at  the  same 
time  to  the  Fourth  Gospel  itself.  That  is  really  the 
issue  before  the  practical  teacher,  and  this  he  cannot 
evade. 

The  view  taken  here  with  regard  to  this  fundamental 
issue  has  been  already  anticipated  in  several  forms  in 
previous  chapters.  On  all  important  points  it  is  that 
taken  and  worked  out,  so  far  as  that  can  be  done  outside 
a  detailed  commentary,  by  Schmiedel,  Scott  and  Gardner  ; 
and  the  following  account  will  follow  their  discussions 
more  or  less  closely  with  regard  to  the  origin,  purpose  and 
nature  of  the  most  important  Johannine  writing. 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    261 


ORIGIN  AND  PURPOSE  OF  THE   FOURTH 
GOSPEL 

Date  and  Origin  of  the  Gospel 

The  Fourth  Gospel  then  was  written  in  Asia  Minor — 
probably  in  Ephesus — somewhere  between  100  and  120 
A.D.  We  do  not  know  the  author  except  in  so  far  as 
his  work  reveals  him.  Nor  do  we  know  anything  of  the 
immediate  occasion  of  his  writing  except  by  inference. 
He  must  have  been  one  of  the  strongest  and  most 
prominent  personalities  in  Asia — a  Jew  perhaps  by  birth 
but  Christian  born  and  bred — a  man  of  deep  and  wide 
Christian  experience,  keenly  interested  in  all  Christian 
problems  and  controversies  of  his  time. 

His  age  saw  the  beginning  of  one  of  the  most  critical 
periods  in  the  history  of  the  Church.  The  new  religion  had 
become  finally  separated  from  its  external  historical 
origins.  Its  bonds  with  Judaism  had  been  finally  broken. 
The  original  Christian  message  had  been  unfolded  by 
Paul  into  a  far  larger  significance.  It  was  surrounded 
by  Hellenic  and  not  Jewish  culture.  At  the  same  time 
the  Christian  Church  had  behind  it  almost  a  century  of 
religious  experience  under  the  influence  of  Jesus  and 
Paul.  All  these  demanded  a  restatement  of  the  Christian 
message,  and  this  is  what  the  Fourth  Gospel  contains.  It 
is  the  author's  expression  of  his  deep  religious  experience 
and  his  new  theology  to  meet  the  needs  of  the  age  in  the 
form  of  a  reinterpretation  of  the  Person  of  Christ  and  a 
reconstruction  of  Christianity. 

General  Nature  of  the  Gospel 

What  he  wrote,  therefore,  was  not  a  Gospel  in  the 
same  sense  as  those  of  Matthew,  Mark  and  Luke.  It  is 
true  that  there  is  in  the  Synoptic  Gospels  also  a  certain 
amount  of  theological  and  apologetic  purpose,  but  it  is 
quite  subordinate  to  the  historical  interest.  In  John,  on 
the  other  hand,  it  is  taken  for  granted  that  the  historical 


262    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

narrative  is  already  familiar  through  the  first  three  Gospels, 
and  the  interest  is  concentrated  upon  the  abiding  religious 
significance  of  the  Living  Christ  for  the  Church.  The 
author  himself  at  the  close  of  the  original  Gospel  (xx.  30, 
31,  chap.  xxi.  being  a  later  appendix)  reveals  to  us  his 
intention  in  writing  :  "  Many  other  signs  did  Jesus  in  the 
presence  of  His  disciples,  which  are  not  written  in  this 
book  :  but  these  are  written  in  order  that  ye  might 
believe  that  Jesus  is  the  Christ,  the  Son  of  God  ;  and  that 
believing  ye  might  have  life  through  His  name."  This, 
read  in  the  light  of  the  age  and  the  Gospel  itself,  tells  us 
almost  everything  we  need  to  know  about  the  general 
purpose  of  the  writer.  He  has  a  practical,  religious  end 
in  view,  but  also  a  theological  and  apologetic  one.  It  is 
suggested  that  he  wishes  also  to  keep  the  Church  in  mind, 
and  when  we  read  the  Epistles  alongside  of  the  Gospel 
we  realize  that  he  has  the  interests  of  the  Church  very 
much  at  heart.  Finally,  he  wishes  also  to  connect  the 
permanent  experience,  the  new  theological  restatement 
and  the  '  belief  '  of  the  Church  with  the  historical  tradi- 
tion—  with  the  historical  personality  of  Jesus.  He 
attempts  to  combine  into  one  dramatic  episode  Christ's 
revelation  of  Himself  —  through  His  earthly  life  and 
through  His  spiritual  presence  ;  and  he  is  confident  that 
in  such  a  way  all  the  various  questions  in  dispute  in  his 
day  can  be  answered. 

The  Features  of  the  Time 

The  situation  which  he  had  to  face  was  a  complex 
one.  On  one  side  the  Jews  were  carrying  on  a  fierce 
crusade  against  Christianity,  arguing  that  the  life  and 
death  of  Jesus  meant  nothing  more  than  the  life  and 
punishment  of  an  evil-doer.  On  the  other  hand  were 
Gnostic  tendencies  which  were  inclined  to  make  Chris- 
tianity into  a  system  of  spiritual  truth,  denying  all  reality 
to  the  historical  life  and  cutting  off  the  Church  from  its 
root  in  history. 

On  the  one  hand  there  was  a  section  of  the  Church 
whose  attention  was  concentrated  upon  building  up  a 
rigid   organization.     This   was   in   danger   of  becoming   a 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    263 

hard  externalism.  On  the  other  hand  were  men  who 
demanded  the  continuance  of  the  freedom  of  the  primitive 
age  which  left  everything  to  the  Spirit,  though  the  con- 
ditions were  rapidly  changing. 

In  other  senses  also  the  time  was  one  of  transition 
and  struggle — opposite  tendencies  in  every  direction 
fighting  each  other  for  life.  The  complexity  of  the 
situation  is  reflected  in  the  Gospel,  with  all  its  contrasts 
and  seeming  contradictions.  It  emphasizes  the  historical 
life  as  a  whole,  but  treats  every  particular  incident  simply 
as  a  mirror  of  eternal  truth.  It  proclaims  the  spiritual 
nature  of  worship,  but  sometimes  suggests  an  almost 
materialistic  theory  of  the  Sacraments.  On  one  side  the 
Evangelist  has  a  simple,  religious  conception  of  Jesus  as 
the  moral  revelation  of  God  and  the  Mediator  of  moral 
and  religious  life  to  others  by  spiritual  fellowship.  On 
the  other  hand.  He  is  the  Logos  who  shares  the  life  of  God, 
which  is  different  in  essence  from  that  of  men,  and  which 
can  only  be  shared  by  almost  magical,  miraculous  means 

Complex  Motives  of  the  Gospel 

The  teacher  must  therefore  remember  in  studying 
any  section  of  the  Fourth  Gospel  that  there  are  probably 
several  motives  underlying  it  and  crossing  one  another. 
He  must  be  continually  asking  himself  questions  like 
these  :  What  religious  experience  or  theological  idea 
does  the  author  wish  to  express  in  this  way  ?  What 
controversy  of  his  own  time  has  he  got  in  mind  ? 
What  argument  against  Christianity  does  he  wish  to 
answer  ? 

He  must  look  at  each  passage  not  as  a  story  about 
Jesus,  nor  as  part  of  His  historical  teaching,  but  as  an 
attempt  to  express  some  later  Christian  experience  or 
some  universal  Christian  truth  which  the  writer  desires 
to  emphasize  ;  or  as  an  answer  to  some  objection  made  to 
Christianity  at  the  beginning  of  the  second  century. 

The  fundamental  feature  of  the  Gospel  is  that  it  is  a 
description  of  the  Christian  religion  as  the  author  had 
understood  and  experienced  it — a  realization  of  the  full 
and  true  life  come  to  him  through  and  in  Jesus  of  Nazareth 


264    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

from  God,  a  real  moral  fellowship  with  the  real  life  of 
God.  It  is  the  expression  of  a  deep  personal  faith.  Jesus 
reveals  and  communicates  the  life  of  God. 

But  this  faith  of  the  author  with  regard  to  the  Christian 
religion  is  not  only  described  from  the  point  of  view  of 
his  own  personal  experience,  but  also  in  such  a  way  as 
to  meet  the  inner  needs  of  the  Church  in  his  time,  to 
help  it  to  meet  the  arguments  of  opponents  and  to  win 
over  the  Greeks.  The  life  and  teaching  of  Jesus  are 
described  and  interpreted  in  such  a  way  as  not  only  to 
explain  the  author's  idea  of  the  Christian  religion,  but 
also  to  meet  as  by  anticipation  the  arguments  of  the 
Jews,  to  correct  extreme  Gnostic  tendencies  and  to  show 
the  meaning  and  place  of  the  sacraments  and  officers  in 
the  life  and  constitution  of  the  Church. 


CONTENT  AND  CHARACTER  OF  THE  FOURTH 

GOSPEL 

Philosophy  and  Theology  of  the  Gospel 

The  whole  Gospel  is,  in  fact,  the  most  daring  attempt 
probably  ever  made  to  exhibit  the  Christian  religion  as 
the  perfect,  absolute  and  universal  religion  —  as  the 
revelation  and  communication  of  God  and  His  life  through 
Jesus  Christ.  It  is  an  attempt  to  explain  and  to  work 
out  this  proposition  along  two  parallel  lines,  both  of  which 
are  present  in  almost  every  section,  but  never  thoroughly 
combined. 

The  first  line  of  argument  and  the  more  evident  is 
philosophical  and  theological.  Jesus  of  Nazareth  is  in 
His  person  the  Logos,  eternally  present  with  God,  the  one 
Mediator  of  Revelation  and  Life,  now  become  real  man 
but  retaining  His  divine  glory.  He  reveals  God,  because 
in  His  nature  He  is  one  with  God.  He  has  become  man 
in  order  that  He  may  give  the  life  of  God  to  men.  That 
life  being  different  in  essence  from  that  of  men,  can  only 
be  given   in   a   semi-physical   way — a   miraculous   almost 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    265 

magical  way — through  giving,  as  it  were,  a  part  of  Himself 
in  His  words  and  deeds  and  the  sacraments  of  the  Church 
— eating  His  flesh  and  drinking  His  blood. 

Historical  and  Religious  Elements 

The  other  line  of  argument  is  historical  and  religious. 
The  author  has  had  for  himself  real  moral  fellowship  with 
the  Living  Christ.  By  a  religious  judgment  in  his  experi- 
ence the  Jesus  of  history  has  become  for  him  the  full 
revelation  of  God.  But  here  it  is  the  moral  sublimity  of 
Jesus  that  constitutes  his  revelation  of  God — the  love, 
the  holiness,  the  self-sacrifice  of  His  earthly  life.  Men 
obtain  the  true  life  by  sharing  in  the  Spirit  of  Jesus, 
identifying  their  will  with  His — in  a  moral  and  spiritual 
sense.  It  is  indeed  in  this  historical  and  religious  line  of 
thought  that  the  real  and  permanent  message  of  the 
Gospel  lies.  The  philosophical  argument  is  only  an 
attempt  to  explain,  to  justify  and  recommend  these  purely 
moral  experiences  and  religious  truths  of  Christianity  to 
the  people  of  the  time.  It  may  be  that  the  philosophical 
argument  decides  the  particular  form  and  even  the  par- 
ticular content  ;  often,  indeed,  obscuring  the  real  message 
of  the  author,  but  it  is  the  deep  religious  experience  under- 
neath that  gives  permanent  value  to  the  Gospel.  Every- 
where the  evangelist  is  trying  to  express  his  deep  and 
mature  experience  of  the  marvellous  moral  and  religious 
power  of  Jesus,  under  metaphysical  categories  which 
belonged  to  the  speculative  thought  of  his  time.  If  he 
has  not  succeeded  in  thoroughly  combining  these  two 
lines  of  thought,  it  is  because  the  speculative  doctrine  of 
the  Logos  was  not  an  adequate  expression  of  the  historical 
revelation  of  Jesus  Christ  or  the  truth  of  Christianity.  It 
was  inevitable,  however,  that  the  attempt  should  some- 
time be  made,  and  the  thinker  who  thus  attempted  to 
combine  elements  from  his  long  religious  experience, 
from  Jewish  Hellenism,  from  the  Pauline  form  of  Chris- 
tianity and  from  the  religious  syncretism  of  the  age,  into 
one  comprehensive  picture  was  not  lacking  in  moral 
and  intellectual  courage  whatever  may  be  thought  of  his 
actual  failure  or  success. 


266    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

Upon  these  foundations  he  has  certainly  succeeded 
in  building  the  most  magnificent  and  comprehensive 
structure  of  thought  in  Christian  history.  In  the  Pro- 
logue (i.  1-18)  the  eternal  divine  Logos  becomes  flesh — 
becomes  man  in  the  person  of  Jesus  Christ.  He  is  then 
brought  on  the  scene  by  the  witness  of  God's  special 
messengers  for  that  purpose,  John  the  Baptist  and  His 
disciples  (i.  19-51).  In  the  first  main  division  of  the 
Gospel  (ii.-xii.)  the  Logos- Jesus  reveals  His  divine  glory 
before  the  world.  He  is  exhibited  as  the  revealer  of  a  new, 
absolute,  spiritual  and  universal  rehgion,  far  surpassing 
all  previous  revelations  (ii.-iv.  42).  Then  He  appears  as 
the  Mediator  of  Life,  the  Bread  of  Life,  the  Light  of  the 
world — as  the  very  Life  itself  (iv.  43-xii.  50).  Finally,  in 
the  second  main  division  of  the  Gospel  (xiii.-xx.  29),  the 
Logos-Jesus  reveals  His  divine  glory  to  His  own  disciples 
through  the  teaching  in  the  Upper  Room  and  through 
His  Passion  and  Resurrection. 


Main  Ideas  of  the  Gospel 

Such  a  bare  sketch  follows  only  one  line  of  the  author's 
thought.  It  is  often  crossed  and  recrossed  by  others,  all 
of  which  are  intended  to  bring  out  the  three  essential 
features  of  the  Johannine  life  and  thought,  namely,  that 
Jesus  Christ  is  the  final  and  universal  revelation  of  God,  that 
the  peculiar  work  of  Jesus  was  to  impart  Life,  and  that  the 
Life  is  communicated  through  personal  union  with  Him. 

In  order  to  express  these  ideas  in  many  forms,  the 
author  has  made  use  of  the  highest  and  most  striking 
theological  and  religious  thought  and  terminology  of  his 
time  and  environment.  The  doctrine  of  the  Logos  as 
the  universal  revealing  utterance.  Word,  and  Reason  of 
God  in  the  world  had  been  a  part  of  the  richest  heritage 
of  Greek  thinking  since  it  had  been  employed  by  the 
Ephesian  philosopher,  Heraclitus,  more  than  five  centuries 
before.  Philo  had  already  introduced  it  into  the  world 
of  Alexandrian  Judaism.  The  Apostle  Paul  and  the 
Epistle  to  the  Hebrews  also  had  made  large  use  of  the 
conception  and  many  of  the  ideas  connected  with  the 
doctrine,    though    without    introducing    the    term    itself. 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    267 

It  was  through  the  Johannine  Hterature  that  its  language 
came  definitely  into  Christian  thought. 

In  words  like  Life,  Truth,  Light,  knowing,  seeing, 
abiding  in  God,  as  used  in  the  Fourth  Gospel,  the  writer 
is  lavish  in  his  use  of  the  vocabulary  of  the  syncretistic 
'  Mystery  Religions  '  of  his  time  and  region. 

The  creative  deed  of  '  John  '  was  to  bring  them  all  to 
the  feet  of  Jesus  Christ,  and  thus  to  make  Christianity 
for  the  first  time  fully  and  definitely  express  itself  as  a 
Hellenistic  religion.  Essentially  he  was  following  in  the 
footsteps  of  Paul.  The  same  theological  framework  lies 
at  the  back  of  both.  Paul  had  already  expressed  the 
cosmic  significance  of  Christ  as  the  eternal  Son  of  God  on 
the  one  hand  and  as  the  Living  Christ  on  the  other,  but 
with  something  like  an  interregnum  between  them.  The 
Johannine  Gospel  developed  both  the  pre-existent  Son 
and  the  Risen  Christ  of  Paul  into  more  definitely 
Hellenistic  forms  than  perhaps  Paul's  Jewish  heritage 
allowed  him  to  do.  More  than  all,  he  inserted  the  Synoptic 
Jesus  in  a  glorified  form  into  the  Pauline  scheme  and 
combined  the  whole  into  one  complete  story.  He  thus 
made  it  into  one  process  of  progressive  revelation,  which 
is  also  a  process  of  redemption  by  the  progressive  com- 
munication of  God's  life  through  the  Logos- Jesus  to  men. 


4 

THE  VALUE  OF  THE  FOURTH  GOSPEL 

Historical  Significance  of  the  Gospel 

In  this  way  the  Fourth  Gospel  made  effective  for  the 
first  time  a  real  alliance  with  Hellenistic  culture.  It 
shows  the  only  way  in  which  Christianity  could  become 
acclimatized  in  the  Gentile  world.  The  new  religion 
inherited  the  results  of  five  centuries  of  Hellenic  thinking, 
and  in  this  way  found  a  truer  expression  for  its  own 
intrinsic  message  than  Jewish  thought  could  ever  hope  to 
give.  The  universality  and  finality  of  the  Christian 
religion  was  thus  plainly  asserted  for  the  first  time,  and  in 


268    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

it  Jesus  Himself  was  given,  once  and  for  all,  His  central 
place  as  its  founder  and  its  divine  object. 

These  represent  the  historical  significance  of  the 
Fourth  Gospel — the  service  performed  especially  by  its 
acceptance  of  the  Logos-theology. 

It  must  not  be  forgotten  that  this  whole  process 
involved  some  loss  as  well  as  great  gain.  The  Evangelist 
desired  to  enhance  the  glory  of  Jesus  by  robing  Him  in 
the  attributes  of  the  Logos,  and  for  his  own  age  he  may 
have  done  so.  For  our  modern  minds,  however,  the 
plain  Synoptic  narrative  in  which  Jesus  passes  before  us 
as  He  actually  lived,  leaves  a  far  truer  and  grander  im- 
pression of  His  divine  character  than  does  the  Logos- 
Jesus  of  the  Fourth  Gospel. 

On  the  other  hand,  even  if  the  Logos-theology  in 
the  particular  form  here  given  to  it  has  no  claim  to  become 
a  permanent  element  in  Christianity,  yet  it  gave  the 
Johannine  writer  the  only  opportunity  within  his  reach 
to  express  some  elements  in  Christianity  which  have  a 
permanent  value.  These  may  now,  it  is  true,  be  expressed 
in  forms  which  are  more  or  less  independent  of  the  Logos- 
doctrine.  And  in  the  conception  of  the  Logos  itself 
there  are  elements  of  permanent  value  for  Christian 
thought  and  life.  More  especially  we  cannot  do  without 
its  emphasis  on  Revelation,  and  on  revelation  as  an 
intelligent  and  an  intelligible  process.  If  we  cannot 
assimilate  the  world  of  thought  of  which  the  Logos  forms 
a  part,  yet  we  must  find  some  substitute  for  it  which 
will  enable  us  to  believe  that  the  universe  has  a  meaning, 
that  the  highest  values  are  to  be  found  in  that  meaning, 
and  that  those  values  are  to  be  found  with  '  John  '  in 
the  person  of  Jesus  Christ.  If  Logos  is  no  longer  adequate 
for  our  purpose,  we  must  find  some  similar  but  better 
category  which  will  as  effectively  help  us  to  find  the  way 
from  Jesus  into  the  realm  of  cosmic  speculation,  as  well 
as  from  cosmic  speculation  back  to  Jesus. 

The  Abiding  Value  of  the  Fourth  Gospel 

That  is  what  this  philosophy  enabled  the  Johannine 
thinker  to  do,  and  that  is  probably  why  the  Fourth  Gospel 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    269 

still  appeals  to  us  as  in  many  ways  the  most  modern 
book  in  the  New  Testament.  In  the  Johannine  message, 
as  a  whole,  there  are  clearly  many  affinities  with  the 
modern  mind  and  some  elements  urgently  needed  by  the 
modern  world  : 

1 .  Its  spiritualization  of  God,  worship,  redemption 
and  the  means  of  salvation  and  its  translation  of  Judg- 
ment, Life,  Death  into  the  realm  of  present  experience 
are  features  of  abiding  value  in  its  presentation  of 
Christianity. 

2.  We  need  the  Fourth  Gospel  as  a  reminder  that 
our  interpretation  of  Christianity  is  not  full  or  complete 
without  some  element  of  speculative  philosophy. 

3.  The  mystical  note  has  points  of  contact  with 
many  modern  tendencies,  but  for  Christian  purposes  it 
is  necessary  that  it  should  be  accompanied  by  the  emphatic 
Johannine  ethical  interpretation  of  its  experience. 

4.  Its  emphasis  on  the  abiding,  spiritual,  eternal 
significance  of  history  is  of  permanent  value.  Its  own 
record  of  the  life  of  Jesus,  it  is  true,  is  vague  and  frag- 
mentary, but  it  asserted  for  all  time  the  essential  signifi- 
cance of  the  earthly  life  ;  and  the  Fourth  Gospel  is  still 
our  best  teacher  of  how  to  read  the  eternal  import  of  the 
Synoptic  narratives.  That  is,  indeed,  what  we  must  do 
if  we  wish  to  preserve  the  real  Johannine  message  for 
modern  use.  He  has  taught  us  to  find  the  eternal  in 
history,  but  the  history  in  which  alone  we  can  now  find 
it  is  not  the  Johannine  but  the  Synoptic. 

5.  The  emphasis  of  the  Fourth  Gospel  on  the  central 
place  of  personality  is  a  welcome  anticipation  and  en- 
couragement of  one  of  the  healthiest  tendencies  of  modern 
thinking.  For  John,  the  highest  revelation  is  in  the  person 
of  Jesus — in  His  words  and  works  as  part  of  Himself. 

6.  Finally,  nowhere  is  such  definite  provision  made 
for  growth  and  progress.  By  affirming  the  continual 
presence  of  Jesus,  the  Fourth  Gospel  secured  for  Christi- 
anity a  principle  of  inward  life  and  ever-fresh  develop- 
ment. His  living  Spirit  is  always  there  to  guide  His 
disciples  into  all  truth. 

With    elements    like    these    as    essential    parts    of   its 


270    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

thought  and  hfe,  the  Fourth  Gospel,  in  spite  of  some 
features  which  we  shall  have  occasion  to  notice  later  on, 
must  always  provide  a  source  of  inspiration  and  guidance 
for  every  age  so  long  as  Christianity  exists.  What  gives 
all  these  their  power  is  the  fact  that  behind  them  is  the 
personal  testimony  of  a  profound  religious  spirit,  express- 
ing in  the  language  of  a  given  time  the  truths  that  were 
vital  to  his  Christian  faith. 


5 

THE  FOURTH  GOSPEL  IN  MODERN  INSTRUCTION 

Difficulties  of  Teaching  the  Fourth  Gospel 

The  task  of  teaching  the  Fourth  Gospel  in  practice 
is  certainly  as  great  as  that  of  tracing  its  origin  and  inter- 
preting its  character  adequately.  It  is  the  ripest  fruit  of 
the  ripest  experience  and  thinking  in  early  Christianity. 
It  attempts  to  fuse  together  so  many  elements  of  very 
different  kinds  and  extremely  difficult  to  harmonize. 
It  is  intimately  interwoven  with  the  peculiarities,  needs 
and  interests  of  one  definite  age — and  that  one  of  the 
most  varied  and  most  complicated  periods  in  the  history 
of  the  ancient  world.  The  result  is  that  its  universe  of 
life  and  thought  is  even  more  foreign  to  us  than  that  of 
the  Apostle  Paul. 

It  is  doubtful  also  whether  we  are  yet  ready  to  appre- 
ciate and  absorb  the  peculiar  influence  upon  the  growth 
of  Christian  character  and  personality  which  the  full 
Johannine  message  can  and  ought  to  exercise.  It  may 
be  that  its  hour  is  not  yet  come,  for  it  reaches  up  to  heights 
still  largely  unsealed  except  by  one  here  and  there.  No- 
where in  the  New  Testament  does  the  Christian  type  of 
life  and  thought  appear  in  so  naked  an  ideal  form  nor 
one  so  full  of  uncharted  possibilities.  Education,  how- 
ever, is  the  natural  home  of  ideals,  and  the  richer  their 
possibilities  the  warmer  must  always  be  their  welcome 
by  the  teacher. 

It  may  be  well,  therefore,  at  the  outset  to  enumerate 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    271 

some  of  the  particular  difficulties  which  must  inevitably 
be  met  in  any  serious  attempt  to  teach  the  Fourth 
Gospel  ;  and  the  mere  enumeration  of  them  ought  to 
be  enough  to  convince  any  experienced  teacher  or  educa- 
tional thinker  of  the  futility  and  absurdity  of  giving  it 
any  early  place  in  the  curriculum. 

Gospel  must  be  taught  as  a  Whole 

I .  The  primary  difficulty,  as  we  have  seen,  arises 
from  the  general  character  and  content  of  the  Gospel  as 
an  attempt  to  reconstruct  Christianity,  and  especially 
Christian  thought,  in  terms  of  Hellenistic  religion  and 
theology.  We  are  asked  to  assimilate  and  to  make  real 
to  the  mind  a  whole  new  universe  in  a  more  or  less  con- 
sistent form.  This  means  that  particular  passages  find 
their  meaning  in  their  full  context.  Whole  sections  at 
least,  if  not  the  whole  Gospel,  must  be  used  connectedly 
as  part  of  the  same  study.  In  this  respect  as  in  others 
it  differs  fundamentally  from  the  Synoptic  Gospels  which 
largely  consist  of  more  or  less  loose  collections  of  in- 
cidents and  sayings.  Within  the  general  sphere  of  the 
life  of  Jesus,  these  can  be  legitimately  treated  separately. 
In  *  John,'  on  the  other  hand,  the  main  point  of  an  in- 
cident is  missed  if  it  is  not  kept  within  its  own  context  in 
the  Gospel.  If,  for  instance,  the  incident  at  the  Pool  of 
Bethesda  (v.  1-18)  were  Synoptic  it  might  form  the  subject 
of  an  independent  study,  but  as  it  is  in  '  John,'  such  a  treat- 
ment would  be  fatal  to  its  meaning  and  value.  It  is  an 
essential  element  in  that  whole  section  of  the  Gospel  which 
extends  from  iv.  43  to  v.  47,  in  which  the  author  exhibits 
Jesus  as  the  Mediator  of  Life.  This  he  does  by  means  of 
two  incidents  meant  to  be  interpreted  allegorically — the 
healing  of  the  nobleman's  son  (iv.  43-54)  and  this  miracle 
at  the  Pool  of  Bethesda  (v.  1-18).  These,  however, 
find    their    point    in    the    discourse    which    follows    them 

(v.  19-47)- 

The  writer  therefore  simply  uses  this  incident  as  one 
element  in  an  attempt  to  reveal  a  Christian  truth. 
Throughout  the  whole  section  the  message  of  the  writer 
is   that  the  Christian  religion  means  moral  and  spiritual 


272    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

health  and  Ufe  in  freedom  from  the  bondage  of  the  Law ; 
and  that  the  Mediator  of  that  Life  and  Freedom  is  Jesus 
in  whose  Person  the  Life  dwells  because  He  is  one  with 
God. 

Its  Allegorical  Method 

2.  This  already  brings  us  face  to  face  with  another 
of  the  main  difficulties  arising  from  the  general  method 
of  the  Evangelist,  That  method  is  allegorical  throughout. 
The  outward  incident  in  each  case  is  only  the  garment 
of  a  spiritual  truth.  It  is  specially  chosen  and  sometimes 
definitely  adapted  for  the  purpose  of  expressing  that 
truth.  The  incidents  therefore  are  not  even  parables 
like  those  of  the  Good  Samaritan  or  the  Prodigal  Son  in 
the  Synoptics,  the  meaning  and  message  of  which  is  in 
the  story  itself,  which  in  its  turn  does  not  need  a  special 
key  to  the  interpretation  of  each  part.  The  only  element 
in  the  Johannine  allegories  which  remains  constant  and 
always  itself  is  Jesus.  The  moral  or  spiritual  counterpart 
of  all  the  other  elements  must  be  substituted  for  each  one 
before  the  incident  can  be  interpreted.  In  the  discourse 
that  follows  every  group  of  incidents,  the  writer  usually 
points  to  or  at  least  suggests  the  proper  substitute.  Thus 
the  incident  of  turning  the  water  into  wine  is  part  of  a 
section  which  expresses  the  contrast  between  Christianity 
and  the  two  older  religions  of  the  Jews  and  the  Samaritans  ; 
and  the  point  of  the  narrative  does  not  appear  until 
Judaism  is  actually  substituted  for  the  water  and 
Christianity  for  the  wine. 

This  allegorical  method  thus  involves  the  frequent 
passage  from  one  universe  of  discourse  to  another — the 
development  of  old  forms  into  new  truths — giving  a  new 
meaning  to  old  words  and  continual  up-to-date  preaching 
in  the  form  of  history — all  involving  the  most  difficult  of 
all  methods  to  disentangle.  It  needs  no  words,  there- 
fore, to  realize  that  to  teach  effectively  a  message  expressed 
in  this  form  is  a  matter  of  great  difficulty  and  delicacy. 
It  is  possible,  of  course,  to  deal  with  such  incidents  super- 
ficially as  if  they  were  simply  historical  incidents  in  the  life 
of  Jesus.  By  doing  so,  however,  we  are  only  grasping  the 
shadow  and  losing  the  substance  ;  and  we  are,  moreover, 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    273 

throwing  the  whole  framework  and  record  of  the  Synoptics 
into  hopeless  confusion. 


Other  Difficult  Features 

3.  Another  fundamental  feature  of  the  Fourth  Gospel 
arises  from  the  fact  that  throughout  it  is  *  John  '  who  is 
speaking  through  Jesus,  or,  as  might  be  said  with  more 
justice,  it  is  always  the  Living  Christ  speaking  through 
'  John.'  A  discourse  that  is  started  nominally  by  Jesus 
often  becomes  before  its  end  a  direct  deliverance  by  the 
writer  of  the  Gospel.  The  whole  Gospel  is  in  a  way  a 
monologue.  That  is  characteristic  of  the  whole  method, 
and  makes  the  task  of  teaching  very  difficult  and  intricate. 

4.  Out  of  these  features  arise  many  less  fundamental 
aspects  of  the  Gospel,  which  make  the  task  of  the  teacher 
still  more  aggravating  when  it  is  seriously  undertaken. 
The  thoughts  and  ideas  are  formulated  in  abstract  and 
stereotyped  forms  ;  the  themes  are  general  ;  the  treat- 
ment is  often  monotonous  in  form  and  content,  and  there 
is  a  good  deal  of  repetition  which  is  difficult  to  make  in 
any  way  interesting.  Over  the  whole  Gospel  also  there 
broods  a  spirit  of  inevitableness  and  fate  which  must 
accompany  any  attempt  to  express  the  present  in  terms 
of  the  past. 

All  these  features  must  naturally  make  the  task  of 
teaching  and  assimilating  the  whole  Johannine  message 
a  supreme  intellectual  and  spiritual  effort  and  the  final 
triumph  of  a  Christian  intelligence  and  faith. 

All  this  points  quite  unmistakably  to  one  thing, 
namely,  that  the  teaching  of  the  Fourth  Gospel  as  such 
belongs  to  no  earlier  a  period  than  very  late  adolescence, 
on  the  verge  of  maturity.  Nothing  but  mischief  can  come 
from  any  attempt  to  employ  it  for  educational  purposes 
during  childhood  or  even  early  adolescence' — except  in 
very  fragmentary  ways,  which  are  always  in  danger  of 
doing  radical  injustice  to  the  Johannine  Gospel  and  its 
essential  message.  The  most  that  we  can  hope  to  do 
during  these  periods  is  to  prepare  the  way  for  a  later 
study. 
18 


274    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

6 

THE  FOURTH  GOSPEL  IN  CHILDHOOD 

In  childhood  and  adolescence,  therefore,  we  must  be 
content  with  deliberately  exploiting  some  fragments  of 
the  Johannine  material  and  with  preparing  the  way  for 
a  later  attempt  to  deal  with  it  as  a  whole. 

Summary  Statements  of  Truth 

There  is,  indeed,  one  feature  of  the  Fourth  Gospel 
that  seems  to  lend  itself  naturally  to  our  use  in  the  earlier 
stages  of  religious  education.  There  is  no  literature  which 
shows  such  a  capacity  to  crystallize  some  of  the  most 
important  features  of  Christianity  and  Christian  life  into 
a  brief,  striking  and  almost  proverbial  statement  and 
form  of  words.  "  God  so  loved  the  world,  that  He  gave 
His  only-begotten  Son,  that  whosoever  believeth  in  Him 
should  not  perish,  but  have  everlasting  life  "  ;  "  My  meat 
is  to  do  the  will  of  Him  that  sent  Me,  and  to  finish  His 
work."  "  If  any  man  will  to  do  His  will,  he  shall  know 
of  the  doctrine."  "  God  is  a  Spirit,  and  they  that  worship 
Him  must  worship  Him  in  spirit  and  in  truth."  "  Ye 
shall  know  the  truth,  and  the  truth  shall  make  you  free." 
Such  sayings  as  these,  and  many  others  that  might  be 
quoted,  are  unforgettable,  universal  summaries  of  the 
life  and  spirit  of  Jesus,  and  such  summaries  have  their 
necessary  place  in  the  process  of  instruction.  By  their 
means  a  whole  series  of  incidents  or  aspects  of  truth 
can  be  indelibly  impressed  upon  the  mind  if  transmitted 
at  the  appropriate  time  after  their  content  has  already 
been  concretely  pictured.  They  can  fruitfully  be 
employed  in  connection  with  the  Synoptic  narratives 
as  summaries  of  their  moral  and  spiritual  meaning. 
Filled  with  a  Synoptic  content,  given  beforehand,  they 
will  be  fixed  in  the  memory  and  become  part  of  the  treasure 
of  life.  Naturally,  it  must  not  be  forgotten  that  by  this 
use  of  them  we  are  exploiting  the  Johannine  literature 
for  Synoptic  or  modern  purposes — a  course  which  is  not 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    275 

without  its  dangers,  and  which  may  need  some  justifica- 
tion in  each  particular  case.  We  have  already  pointed 
out  in  a  previous  chapter  that  the  gain,  in  some  cases  at 
least,  is  greater  than  the  loss  in  scientific  exegesis. 

Historical  Fragments 

The  only  other  possibility  of  using  the  Johannine 
material  before  adolescence  is  well  advanced  depends 
upon  the  view  taken  of  the  historical  value  of  some 
incidents  in  the  Fourth  Gospel  of  which  we  find  no  trace 
in  the  Synoptic  Gospels.  It  is  certain  that  there  are 
fragments  of  the  authentic  history  of  Jesus  preserved  in 
*  John  '  alone.  Whether,  however,  these  can  still  be 
recognized  and  rescued  for  the  teaching  of  history  is 
somewhat  doubtful. 

There  are  also  in  the  Fourth  Gospel  some  attractive 
and  dramatic  human  touches — such  as  that  of  Jesus 
sitting  thirsty  and  weary  at  the  well  ;  fragments  of 
parables  such  as  that  of  the  shepherd  leading  his  sheep  ; 
and  suggestions  of  incidents  such  as  that  of  the  people 
seeking  to  make  Jesus  King.  If  these  could  be  incor- 
porated legitimately  into  the  narrative  of  the  life  of  Jesus, 
it  would  be  well  worth  the  trouble  of  doing  so.  In  any 
case,  however,  to  be  of  value  they  must  be  taken  entirely 
out  of  their  Johannine  context  and  made  consonant 
with  the  Synoptic  spirit  as  well  as  the  Synoptic  narrative. 

It  may  well  be  that  some  suggestions  such  as  these 
might  be  seriously  considered  by  the  teacher  so  long  as 
he  knows  what  he  is  doing.  Some  points  of  contact 
with  the  Fourth  Gospel  might  thus  be  found  even  in 
the  early  stages  of  education. 


7 

THE  BACKGROUND  OF  THE  FOURTH  GOSPEL 

To  prepare  the  way  for  a  later  study  of  the  Johannine 
life  and  thought  will  in  any  case  be  a  necessary  and 
very    fruitful    part    of    the    teacher's    work    during    the 


276    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

earlier  stages  of  adolescence.  This  preparation  ought  to 
take  several  forms — literary,  historical,  religious  and 
philosophical. 


Preparatory  Studies 

1 .  Some  elementary  introduction  to  the  Johannine 
literature  and  its  history  should  naturally  form  part  of 
a  study  of  the  origin,  character  and  history  of  the  New 
Testament  writings. 

2.  More  to  our  purpose  would  be  a  series  of  historical 
and  missionary  studies  of  Christianity  during  the  period 
from  about  60  to  120  a.d.  in  the  Province  of  Asia.  This 
would  form  the  continuation  of  Paul's  activity  in  Ephesus, 
such  as  has  hitherto  been  missing  in  the  ordinary  studies 
of  the  background  of  the  literature  of  the  New  Testament. 
It  would  bring  into  prominence  some  elements  in  the  life 
and  thought  of  the  Roman  Empire  which  are  becoming 
more  and  more  necessary  for  the  adequate  interpretation 
of  many  parts  of  the  New  Testament  besides  the  Johannine 
literature. 

Asia  was  in  many  ways  the  very  centre  of  the 
world's  life,  and  towards  the  end  of  the  century  was  fast 
becoming  a  Christian  country.  Paul  had  made  Ephesus 
the  centre  of  his  mission  for  several  years,  and  here  his 
influence  was  felt  most  of  all.  Whoever  '  John  '  was, 
he  represents  some  significant  personalities  and  move- 
ments in  Asia,  engaged  in  active  Christian  propaganda 
for  the  purpose  of  consolidating  the  work  of  Paul  and 
winning  the  great  cities  of  Asia  for  Christ  and  His  Gospel. 
For  the  adequate  interpretation  of  the  Johannine  writings, 
some  picture  of  the  historical  and  religious  situation  in 
Asia  must  be  given — its  city  life,  its  political  and  religious 
federation  of  the  cities,  its  passionate  loyalty  to  the 
Empire  and  its  ideals,  its  touch  with  the  primitive  nature- 
cults  of  the  Hinterland,  the  influence  of  the  Oriental 
cults,  the  origin  and  spread  of  the  worship  of  Csesar,  its 
tradition  of  Hellenic  philosophy  in  characteristic  forms, 
as  well  as  the  material  prosperity  due  to  its  position  and 
energy  and  its  intimate  touch  with  the  whole  Mediterranean 
world . 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    277 

Historical  and  Religious  Background 

Ephesus  was  for  a  long  time  the  great  centre  of  Chris- 
tianity, and  a  great  deal  of  Christian  life  and  literature 
was  intimately  connected  with  Asia.  In  addition  to  the 
Johannine  a  great  deal  of  the  New  Testament  literature 
issued  from  Asia  or  was  first  directed  thither.  First 
Corinthians  was  written  from  Ephesus,  while  First  Peter, 
Ephesians,  Colossians,  Philemon,  were  first  read  there. 
Polycarp,  Ignatius,  Montanus,  Papias,  as  well  as  Pliny, 
have  intimate  connections  with  Asia  and  the  surrounding 
regions. 

To  call  attention  to  the  situation  of  the  Christian 
Church  and  its  many  complicated  problems  in  this  special 
region  at  the  end  of  the  first  and  the  beginning  of  the 
second  century  would  be  a  solid  contribution  to  the  task 
of  teaching  the  New  Testament.  The  Church  was  already 
in  possession  of  the  two  great  presentations  of  Christ 
represented  by  the  historical  picture  of  Jesus  in  the 
Synoptic  Gospels  on  the  one  hand,  and  by  the  worship  of 
the  Risen  Lord  in  Paul  on  the  other  hand.  Neither  gave 
a  complete  or  satisfactory  account  of  the  Christian  faith. 
Gnostic  and  Docetic  tendencies  in  the  syncretistic  thought 
of  the  Hellenistic  world  were  beginning  to  disintegrate 
one  or  both  of  them,  and  the  Church  could  not  afford  to 
lose  either.  There  was  urgent  need  of  finding  some  way 
from  the  concrete  Jesus  into  the  cosmic  philosophy  of 
the  time  or  vice  versa.  Within  the  Church  itself  the 
struggle  was  beginning  between  the  free  and  prophetic 
forms  of  '  enthusiasm  *  which  had  marked  the  first 
period  and  the  need  for  a  more  stable  organization  and 
federation. 

These  and  a  number  of  other  urgent  problems  could 
not  be  solved  without  a  far  more  thorough  attempt  than 
had  hitherto  been  made  to  fuse  the  disparate  elements 
in  the  growing  life  and  thought  of  the  Church  into  a 
comprehensive  reconstruction  of  Christianity.  The  only 
attempt  of  this  kind  which  has  come  down  to  us  is  re- 
presented by  the  Johannine  literature.  Its  only  serious 
rival  must  be  found  in  the  Gnostic  speculations  which  ran 
the  serious  danger  of  losing  the  peculiar  Christian  faith 


278    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

in  the  universal  religious  and  intellectual  syncretism  of  the 
Hellenistic  world. 

3.  Sometime  also  an  attempt  must  be  made  to  prepare 
the  way  for  the  understanding  and  appreciation  of  the 
Johannine  doctrine  of  the  Logos  and  the  characteristic 
Johannine  use  of  such  terms  as  Life,  Truth  and  Light. 
At  least  three  different  ways  of  doing  this  might  be  tenta- 
tively suggested  : 


The  Doctrine  of  the  Logos 

(a)  The  previous  use  of  the  conception  of  the  Logos 
and  the  term  might  be  traced  in  an  elementary  way — in 
Greek  philosophy  generally  from  Heraclitus  downwards, 
and  especially  its  particular  application  by  the  Stoics 
and  in  different  centres  of  Hellenistic  thought,  its  relation 
to  the  use  of  Wisdom  in  the  Old  Testament  and  Judaism, 
its  use  by  Philo  of  Alexandria,  the  introduction  of  the 
conception  without  the  term  into  Christian  thought  by 
Paul  and  the  writer  to  the  Hebrews,  until  '  John  '  formally 
adopts  it  as  his  own.  This,  of  course,  is  a  difficult  task 
and  requires  a  good  deal  of  consideration  and  study  on 
the  part  of  the  teacher. 

(b)  It  might  be  possible,  too,  to  begin  at  the  other  end 
and  to  make  the  understanding  of  the  Logos  philosophy 
somewhat  easier  by  drawing  upon  the  use  of  such  terms 
as  principles  and  category,  laws  of  nature  and  evolution, 
spirit,  world-soul  and  universal  reason,  by  modern 
scientists,  philosophers  and  men  of  letters.  Such  terms 
do  express  in  some  way  or  other  the  conviction  that  the 
universe  is  intelligible  and  has  meaning  at  the  back  of  it 
and  in  it.  They  serve  as  landmarks  on  the  way  from  the 
individual  and  the  concrete  into  the  realm  of  cosmic 
speculation.  In  some  such  way  as  this  the  capable 
teacher,  starting  from  some  of  the  more  familiar 
generalizing  terms  of  our  own  day,  might  lead  his  pupils 
back  to  some  aspects  of  the  Logos  philosophy,  and  thus 
contribute  to  the  better  appreciation  of  the  essential 
Johannine  message  that  the  fundamental  meaning  of  the 
universe  is  to  be  found  in  Jesus  Christ,  which  is  what  the 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE     279 

author  intended  to  convey  by  his  adoption  of  the  con- 
ception of  the  Logos. 


Terminology  of  the  Mystery  Religions 

(c)  In  the  body  of  the  Fourth  Gospel,  Jesus  Christ, 
the  Logos  of  the  preface,  becomes  also  the  Life,  the  Truth 
and  the  Light  of  the  world.  For  the  understanding  of 
such  terms  as  these  and  such  others  as  *  hear,'  '  see,' 
*  abide,'  which  are  so  characteristic  of  the  Fourth  Gospel, 
we  need  some  study  of  the  '  Mystery  Religions  '  of  the 
time  and  of  the  ideas  and  terms  which  they  helped  to 
create  and  fix  during  the  first  centuries  of  our  era.  As  a 
preliminary  study  of  Pharisaism  has  been  found  necessary 
for  the  adequate  appreciation  of  Paul's  theological  ideas 
and  vocabularly,  so  we  are  beginning  to  realize  that  a 
knowledge  of  the  syncretistic  Mystery  Cults,  travelling 
from  East  to  West  side  by  side  with  Christianity,  is 
necessary  for  the  adequate  understanding  of  the  Johannine 
writings,  which  are  saturated  with  their  ideas  and 
vocabulary. 

Unfortunately,  however,  the  study  of  the  religious 
life  of  the  Hellenistic  world  in  this  respect  is  still  only  in 
its  infancy.  Probably  for  some  time  to  come  the  teacher 
will  be  provided  with  but  very  inadequate  materials  for  the 
study  of  the  genesis  and  history  of  many  perplexing 
elements  in  the  Johannine  thought  and  language.  What 
he  needs  especially  to  realize  is  that  such  studies  as  these 
will  be  necessary  for  a  full  appreciation  of  the  Johannine 
life  and  thousrht. 


8 

THE  FOURTH  GOSPEL  IN  CHRISTIAN 
EDUCATION 

The  Johannine  Life  and  Thought 

It  is  not  at  all  certain  that  a  connected  study  of  such  a 
daring  and  comprehensive  reconstruction  of  Christianity 
as  '  John  '  represents  can  ever  become  an  ordinary  part 


28o    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

of  the  general  instruction  of  all  youth  or  even  of  all 
Christians,  As  in  all  '  mystical  '  forms  of  religion,  there 
are  in  it  elements  which  will  never  and  can  never  become 
part  of  the  common  inheritance  of  mankind.  The  typically 
Johannine  form  of  Christianity  makes  its  full  appeal — 
at  present  at  least — to  only  one  type  of  capacity,  experi- 
ence and  temperament.  It  is  indeed  worth  considering 
whether  it  is  not  a  truth  of  some  educational  significance 
that  the  three  great  types  of  Christian  life  and  thought 
in  the  New  Testament  really  represent  more  or  less 
permanent  types  of  Christian  experience — a  Synoptic,  a 
Pauline  and  a  Johannine  type  of  experience — that  they 
have  to  be  developed  each  on  its  own  lines  and  that  the 
literature  of  the  other  types  will  only  make  a  very  partial 
appeal  to  each. 

In  any  case,  the  great  task  of  the  teacher  will  be  to 
pursue  such  a  study  of  the  Johannine  writings  and  back- 
ground as  will  enable  him  and  his  pupils  to  pass  through 
their  particular  forms  intelligently  and  sympathetically, 
in  such  a  way  as  to  come  face  to  face  with  the  great  moral 
and  religious  power  and  experience  often  hidden  under- 
neath the  peculiar  Johannine  forms.  Thus  only  can  be 
assimilated  those  elements  in  the  Fourth  Gospel  which 
are  of  permanent  and  universal  value  for  the  growth  and 
progress  of  the  common  Christian  life  and  thought — its 
combination  of  history  and  faith,  of  personality  and 
principle  ;  its  urge  towards  an  ethical  and  religious 
interpretation  of  the  universe  ;  its  emphasis  on  the 
reality  of  revelation  ;  its  conception  of  revelation  as  an 
intelligent  and  intelligible  process  and  as  accomplished 
through  personality  ;  its  principle  of  freedom  and  pro- 
gress ;  and,  most  of  all,  its  emphasis  upon  the  person 
of  Jesus  Christ  as  the  key  to  the  fundamental  meaning 
of  the  universe  and  the  indispensable  Mediator  of  the 
divine  life. 

BOOKS 

Bacon  (B.  W.). — The  Fourth  Gospel  in  Research  and  Debate.     (New 

York,  19  lo.) 
Drummond    (J.). — Character   and   Authorship   of  the    Fourth   Gospel. 

(London,  1904.) 
Gardner  (P.). — The  Ephesian  Gospel.     (London,  1915.) 


JOHANNINE  LITERATURE,  THOUGHT  AND  LIFE    281 

Green  (A.  V.). — The  Ephesian  Canonical  Writings.     (London,  1910.) 
Humphries   (A.   L.)- — St.   John  and  other  New   Testament   Teachers. 

(London,  1910.) 
MoFFATT  (J.). — Introduction  to  the  Literature  oj  the  New  Testament, 

pp.  516-616.     (Edinburgh,  191 1.) 
Sand  AY  (W.). — The  Criticism  of  the  Fourth  Gospel.     (Oxford,  1905.) 
ScHMiEDEL  (P.  W.). — The  Johannine  Writings.     (London,  1908.) 
Scott  (E.  F.). — The  Fourth  Gospel — its  Purpose  and  Theology.     (Edin- 
burgh, 1909.) 
Strachan  (R.  H.). — The  Fourth  Gospel :  Its  Significance  and  Environ- 
ment.    (S.C.M.,  1920.) 


CHAPTER  XIV 

JESUS   CHRIST   AND   THE    KINGDOM    OF   GOD 

1.  The  Variety  and  Unity  of  the  New  Testament. — The  Twofold  Process 

of  Education — The  Variety  of  the  New  Testament — Its  Unity — 
Three  Main  Types  of  Thought — Freedom  of  Interpretation — 
Creating  Joy  in  the  Gospel. 

2.  The  Triumphs  and  Failures  of  Christianity . — The  Ancient  and  the 

Mediaeval  World — Transition  to  the  Modern  World. 

3.  The  Modern  Situation  and  its  Meaning. — The  Needs  and  Tasks  of 

the  Modern  World — The  Essence  of  the  Modern  Struggle. 

4.  The  Personal  and  Social  Ideal  of  the  Gospel. — Jesus  Christ  and  the 

Kingdom  of  God — Different  Expressions  of  the  Ideal — Value 
of  the  Historical  Picture  of  Jesus — The  Contributions  of  Paul 
and  John. 

5.  The  New  Testament  Demand. — The  Gospel  Complete  in  Principle — 

The  New  Testament  limited  in  the  Application  of  the  Gospel. 

6.  The  Christian  Church  in  the  Modern  World. — The  Gospel  needs  the 

Church — The  Church  and  the  Gospel  for  the  World's  Needs. 


THE  VARIETY  AND  UNITY  OF  THE  NEW 
TESTAMENT 

It  has  been  the  aim  of  the  previous  chapters  to  provide 
some  introduction  to  a  much-needed  systematic  dis- 
cussion of  the  value  of  the  New  Testament  in  and  for 
modern  instruction  and  education. 

A  Twofold  Process 

Any  such  discussion  must  continually  keep  in  mind 
the  fact  that  all  real  education  involves  a  twofold  process. 
On  the  one  hand,  it  means  the  effective  transmission  to  a 
new   generation   of  those   '  values  *   which   have   already 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       283 

been  revealed  in  the  history  of  the  race.  The  significant 
past  has  its  own  inherent  rights,  and  mankind  can  only 
be  effectively  educated  along  the  lines  of  the  ideals  which 
have  grown  out  of  its  own  history  and  experience. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  present  and  the  future  have 
their  own  imperative  claims,  far  more  urgent  indeed 
than  those  of  the  past.  History,  however  great,  cannot 
be  allowed  to  tyrannize  over  life. 

Essentially,  therefore,  we  have  had  before  us  two 
questions.  In  what  sense  and  to  what  extent  is  the 
New  Testament  a  significant  record  of  the  past  of 
humanity,  and  how  far  does  it  incorporate  '  values  '  which 
are  worth  preserving  and  reproducing  in  every  new 
generation  ?  In  what  sense  and  to  what  extent  is  the 
New  Testament  capable  of  responding  to  the  claims  of 
the  modern  world  for  an  adequate  answer  to  its  needs 
and  for  power  to  meet  its  heavy  tasks  ? 

Closely  connected  as  these  two  questions  must  always 
be,  it  may  be  well  to  gather  together  separately  some  of 
the  general  results  that  seem  to  emerge  from  our  dis- 
cussions from  these  two  points  of  view. 

The  Variety  of  the  New  Testament 

It  is  no  small  task  to  make  the  writings  of  the  New 
Testament  intelligible  and  interesting  at  the  present  day  in 
order  to  transmit  the  central  ideals  and  values,  or  what  we 
have  already  called  the  Gospel,  which  these  writings  reveal. 

One  of  its  primary  conditions  is  that  we  should  be 
allowed  and  are  able  to  pass  beyond  the  written  word 
to  the  moral  and  spiritual  movement  which  created  it 
and  to  the  living  experiences  of  the  men  who  created 
the  movement.  The  first  step  is  to  make  the  history  of 
early  Christianity  intelligible  through  the  writings  and 
any  other  means  within  our  reach  ;  and  so  at  the  same 
time  to  make  the  writings  themselves  interesting  because 
of  the  men  behind  them. 

In  this  way  alone  are  we  able  to  do  justice  to  the  rich 
variety  of  the  New  Testament  in  its  presentation  of  the 
Christian  ideals,  in  the  appeals  it  makes  on  their  behalf, 
in   the   circumstances   and  actual   situations   it   attempts 


284    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

to  meet,  and  in  the  personalities  who  represent  these 
Christian  ideals.  This  variety,  as  we  have  seen,  has  its 
own  peculiar  educational  value. 


The  Unity  of  the  New  Testament 

We  cannot  rest  content  with  this,  however,  for  we 
cannot  be  said  to  have  appreciated  adequately  the  message 
of  the  New  Testament  until  we  have  worked  our  way 
through  its  variety  into  its  unity.  For  educational 
purposes  especially,  we  need,  not  simply  an  unconnected 
series  of  ideals,  but  some  unified  system  of  ideals  or  some 
living  centre  out  of  which  they  spring  spontaneously. 
We  have  already  discussed  the  kind  of  unity  to  be  found 
in  the  New  Testament  from  several  points  of  view  and 
in  several  forms. 

We  are  always  driven  back  beyond  the  several  books 
of  the  New  Testament  with  their  various  ideas  and 
doctrines  to  their  different  writers.  Beyond  these,  with 
their  differing  experiences  and  activities,  we  are  driven 
to  the  underlying  purpose,  life  and  spirit  common  to 
them  all.  This  is  incorporated  in  its  purest  form  in  the 
message,  work  and  personality  of  Jesus  of  Nazareth,  in 
His  life  with  the  Father,  His  life  and  death  for  men,  in 
His  preaching  of  the  Kingdom  of  God.  This  is  the 
Gospel  out  of  which  the  New  Testament  sprang,  in  which 
it  finds  its  unity  and  for  the  sake  of  which  it  still  exists. 
This  spirit  of  life  follows  us  like  a  pervading  presence 
throughout  the  pages  of  the  New  Testament,  though 
there  is  nowhere  anything  like  a  systematic  analysis  of 
the  ideals  and  values  incorporated  in  it  and  created  by  it. 
Such  an  analysis  adequate  for  all  time  has  never  yet  been 
found  and  is  probably  impossible.  This  spirit  is  a  centre 
of  such  rich  possibilities  that  each  age  has  taken  from  it 
according  to  the  need  of  the  time,  and  left  the  rest  for 
other  ages  to  explore. 

Three  Main  Types  of  Life  and  Thought 

What  we  do  find  in  the  New  Testament  is  the  expres- 
sion of  this  essential  Christian  Gospel  in  many  different 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       285 

forms,  in  the  terms  of  different  situations  and  in  answer 
to  different  needs.  These  may  legitimately  be  reduced 
to  three,  namely,  that  of  the  Synoptic  Gospels,  of  Paul 
and  of  the  Johannine  writings,  though  there  are  one  or 
two  others  (especially  that  of  the  Epistle  to  the  Hebrews) 
which  come  very  near  to  these  in  their  significance. 

It  forms  a  great  part  of  the  task  of  the  teacher  of 
the  New  Testament  to  give  as  clear  an  historical  picture 
as  possible,  from  the  material  at  his  disposal,  of  these  pre- 
sentations in  their  differences  as  well  as  in  their  similarities. 

For  both  apologetic  and  educative  purposes,  it  is  well 
that  men  should  realize  that  Christianity  is  not  bound 
to  any  one  presentation  of  Christ.  Since  the  days  of  the 
New  Testament  there  have  been  numberless  others.  A 
clear  knowledge  of  the  characteristic  features  of  as  many 
of  them  as  possible  will  materially  contribute  to  the 
healthy  conviction  that  the  Christian  Gospel  is  of  such  a 
character  that  it  demands  continual  and  progressive 
incarnation,  reinterpretation  and  analysis.  Tempera- 
ment, education,  interest  and  need  have  had  their  say, 
will  have  their  say  and  must  be  allowed  to  exercise  freely 
their  legitimate  influence  upon  the  expression  of  the 
Gospel. 

Freedom  of  Interpretation 

There  are  genuine  interpretations  of  the  Gospel  not 
only  in  terms  of  Jesus  Himself,  but  also  of  God  and  of  the 
conscience.  Sometimes  it  is  the  historical  element  that 
has  been  central,  sometimes  the  ethical  and  sometimes 
the  purely  religious.  Now  it  has  taken  almost  exclusively 
personal  forms  and  then  been  predominantly  social  in 
its  expression.  To  some,  ideal  has  seemed  the  one  word 
to  express  its  peculiarity.  To  others,  its  power  has  been 
all  in  all.  Some  have  seen  its  truth,  others  its  beauty 
and  others  its  goodness.  Every  interpretation  has  been 
conditioned  by  some  actual  situation,  and  consciously 
or  unconsciously  has  been  designed  to  meet  it.  They 
are  one  and  all  naturally  incomplete,  but  they  are  all 
justifiable  and  necessary  to  the  full  life  of  the  Gospel. 
Through  their  partial  conflict  of  emphasis  no  less  than 


286    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

through  their  recognition  of  one  another  and  their  co- 
operation, we  may  in  the  end  come  to  some  consensus 
of  judgment  upon  the  value  and  content  of  the  whole 
personality  of  Jesus  Christ  and  its  personal  and  social, 
ethical,  religious  and  philosophical  implications.  It  is 
examples  and  illustrations  of  the  most  typical  of  such 
interpretations  that  we  get  in  the  New  Testament.  In 
Jesus  Himself  they  are  all  more  than  fulfilled,  and  the 
Christian  teacher  must  never  be  satisfied  with  merely 
transmitting  a  particular  interpretation  of  Jesus,  but 
must  always  press  forward  to  the  point  where  His  pupils 
will  be  compelled  by  their  own  personal  knowledge  of 
the  Master  to  work  out  their  own  appreciation  and  inter- 
pretation of  Him.  We  cannot  teach  the  New  Testament 
adequately  without  realizing  that  its  power  and  meaning 
lie  in  a  living  spirit  incorporated  in  an  historical  personality, 
with  whom  every  man  must  come  into  personal  communion 
— a  personality  who  will  make  his  own  terms  with  heart 
and  mind  and  will — with  the  conscience  of  each  disciple. 
The  value  of  every  interpretation  lies  in  the  help  it  can 
give  to  find  the  point  of  closest  contact  between  Jesus 
and  each  scholar.  That  is  the  end  and  aim  of  teaching 
the  New  Testament. 

We  ought  not  to  find  it  so  difficult  as  we  do  to  make 
its  Gospel  intelligible  and  interesting  to  the  modern  mind 
when  we  consider  the  many  concrete,  dramatic,  experi- 
mental, ethical,  religious,  intellectual  and  personal  forms 
in  which  so  many  aspects  of  it  are  presented  to  us  in  the 
New  Testament  and  elsewhere.  All  our  many  hopes  will 
certainly  be  disappointed  if  we  do  not  succeed  in  making 
it  both  intelligible  and  interesting  to  the  youth  of  to-day. 

Creating  Joy  in  the  Gospel 

It  may  be  worth  while  emphasizing  the  fact  that  any 
teaching  of  the  New  Testament  which  does  not  create 
an  increasing  interest  and  an  overflowing  gladness  in 
the  hearts  of  our  pupils  must  mean  failure  of  several 
kinds.  It  is  failure  from  the  point  of  view  of  effective 
education.  It  is  a  greater  failure  from  the  point  of  view 
of  the  New  Testament  itself,  for  it  fails  to  represent  and 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       287 

to  transmit  one  of  the  central  elements  in  the  early 
Christian  life  and  writings.  The  note  of  the  gladness  of 
rejoicing  rings  through  every  part  of  the  New  Testament. 
It  is  one  of  its  characteristic  marks.  It  is  especially 
necessary,  too,  that  there  should  be  happy  memories  of 
the  hours  of  Biblical  instruction.  To  associate  them 
with  dulness  and  weariness  has  for  long  been  one  of  our 
grievous  sins  against  the  spirit  of  youth. 

How,  therefore,  to  arouse  genuine  interest  and  joy 
in  the  things  of  the  Gospel  should  be  a  problem  constantly 
occupying  the  attention  of  the  teacher,  and  he  must  not 
be  tempted  to  imagine  that  it  can  be  solved  by  any 
external  tricks  and  dodges.  Naturally,  it  goes  without 
saying  that  there  must  be  elements  of  interest  in  the 
form  and  mode  of  the  presentation  itself.  Much  more 
important  than  this,  however,  is  it  that  the  content  of 
the  lessons  should  of  itself  be  interesting. 

What  is  of  essential,  permanent  interest,  is  what  does 
actually  supply  a  need  already  felt,  while  whatever  is 
intimately  connected  with  that  easily  becomes  interesting 
by  association.  If  this  process  be  thought  out,  it  will  be 
seen  that  in  order  to  make  the  New  Testament  educa- 
tionally effective,  the  teacher  must  come  to  it  not  only 
as  a  record  of  the  past  and  its  values,  which  he  desires 
to  transmit,  but  also  from  that  other  side  which  was 
mentioned  at  the  beginning  of  this  chapter.  He  must, 
that  is,  come  to  the  New  Testament  acutely  conscious 
of  the  imperative  needs  and  demands  of  modern  life, 
and  supremely  confident  that  in  the  early  history  of 
Christianity  he  has  found  a  definite  and  significant  con- 
tribution of  supreme  value  for  the  satisfaction  of  those 
needs. 

A  discussion,  therefore,  of  the  place  of  the  New 
Testament  in  modern  education  is  not  complete  without 
some  attempt  to  describe  the  character  and  extent  of 
the  contribution  which  the  New  Testament  is  capable  of 
making  towards  the  production  of  an  ideal  and  of  the 
power  of  enforcing  it,  which  are  adequate  in  content  for 
the  satisfaction  of  the  real  needs  of  the  modern  life  and 
world  and  which  are  sufficient  in  inspiration  for  the 
performance  of  its  great  and  difficult  tasks. 


288    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 


THE  TRIUMPHS  AND  FAILURES  OF 
CHRISTIANITY 

The  Ancient  and  Medieval  World 

It  is  of  its  social  needs  that  the  modern  world  is  most 
conscious,  and  it  is  by  standards  of  social  adequacy  that 
it  is  most  apt  to  judge  men  and  movements.  We  are 
only  just  beginning  to  learn  effectively  that  the  personal 
and  social  problems  of  humanity  are  essentially  inter- 
dependent and  can  only  be  solved  together.  In  all 
teaching  it  is,  therefore,  necessary  to  appreciate  the  fact 
that  the  easiest  and  most  certain  point  of  contact  with 
men  to-day  lies  in  their  social  life,  interests  and  needs. 

The  question  of  the  specifically  modern  value  of  the 
New  Testament  must,  as  a  consequence,  become  first  of 
all  one  of  its  social  power  ;  and  it  cannot  be  intelligently 
discussed  without  some  brief  reference  to  the  way  in 
which  the  present  social  situation  has  arisen  and  what 
Christianity  has  already  done  to  meet  and  overcome 
similar  crises  in  the  past. 

There  are  many  defects  and  failures  which  may  with 
justice  be  set  down  against  the  Christian  Church  in  its 
account  with  the  world  as  a  whole.  It  must,  however, 
be  granted  that  at  two  at  least  of  the  severest  crises 
through  which  Europe  has  yet  passed,  it  was  the  Christian 
Church  and  the  Christian  faith  which  came  to  its  rescue. 

In  the  disintegration  of  the  ancient  world  it  was 
mainly  by  means  of  Christianity  that  it  became  possible 
to  transmit  the  rich  heritage  of  that  world  to  the  Europe 
of  the  Middle  Ages  and  thence  to  modern  times.  On  the 
ruins  of  the  old,  it  was  mainly  the  Church  that  created  a 
new  world  and  a  new  civilization  so  well  built  and  so 
strong  as  to  last  for  many  centuries  under  its  own  care- 
ful and  minute  moral  and  spiritual  guardianship.  The 
Church  was  strong  enough  to  dominate  the  life  it  had 
created,  but  it  did  so  in  such  a  way  and  to  such  an  extent 
that  its  authority  became  a  tyranny  impossible  for  men 
to  endure. 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       289 

Later  on,  it  was  a  revival  of  Christian  faith  within  the 
Church  itself  that  at  last  broke  the  domination  of  Rome 
over  Europe,  and  one  of  the  main  elements  in  that  re- 
vival was  the  direct  power  of  the  New  Testament.  This 
time,  however,  the  Protestantism  which  gave  the  main 
impetus  to  the  transformation  of  the  Middle  Ages  into 
the  modern  world  failed  in  the  end  to  maintain  its  moral 
and  spiritual  authority  over  the  life  which  it  had  so 
helped  to  create.  It  allowed  and  even  encouraged  the 
creation  and  growth  of  great  Sovereign  States,  a  world- 
wide capitalistic  system  of  Industry  which,  as  Troeltsch 
says,  "  has  power  to  increase  production  of  a  kind  almost 
indefinitely,  mobilizing  the  whole  world  for  labour  and 
mechanizing  man  as  well  as  labour." 

Transition  to  the  Modern  World 

The  Church  failed  utterly  to  control  the  political 
and  economic  forces  it  had  let  loose.  They  crushed  their 
own  ruthless  way  over  the  bodies  and  souls  of  men, 
carrying  with  them  and  in  their  service  the  unparalleled 
discoveries  of  modern  science,  the  triumphs  of  modern 
education  and  even  the  benediction  of  the  Churches 
themselves.  They  went  their  own  way,  it  is  true,  in  utter 
defiance  of  the  too  feeble  attempts  of  Christian  teachers 
to  inculcate  a  sense  of  personal  responsibility  in  the  rich 
and  the  strong  who  profited  ;  to  preach  the  duty  of 
charitable  love  for  the  poor  and  the  weak  who  were  being 
crushed  to  death  ;  to  prohibit  luxury  and  the  mad  rush 
for  pleasure  ;  and  to  denounce  the  Mammonism  which 
was  the  natural  result  of  the  political  and  economic 
system.  It  is  true  that  a  certain  type  of  Democracy  and 
Liberalism  grew  out  of  the  industrial  Revolution,  but  it 
was  a  merely  rationalistic  and  utilitarian  freedom  and 
democracy  which  was  not  only  very  limited  in  its  range 
but  also  very  insecure  in  its  foundation.  We  can  now 
see  that  the  Church  failed  almost  completely  to  supply 
the  industrial  and  political  system  with  the  necessary 
ethical  and  religious  spirit,  which  were  absolutely  necessary 
in  order  to  avoid  its  serious  dangers,  and  which  the  system 
was  naturally  incapable  of  generating  out  of  its  own 
19 


2go    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

life.  These  dangers  have  long  ago  developed  into  grim 
realities  and  have  now  become  manifest  to  all  men  in  a 
world-wide  catastrophe,  of  which  the  Great  War  itself 
was  only  a  symptom.  The  revolt  of  man,  partly  under 
the  influence  of  such  radical  reinterpretations  of  the 
New  Testament  as  that  of  Tolstoy,  against  the  machinery 
of  profit  and  power  has  already  become  a  revolution  in 
many  parts  of  the  world,  and  it  is  to  be  hoped  that  there 
is  still  enough  of  life's  energy  left  in  the  peoples  every- 
where to  wage  a  successful  '  root-and-branch  '  crusade 
against  the  whole  idea  of  a  world  divided  out  between 
a  few  great  sovereign  military  States  and  of  a  world-wide 
industrial  system  built  up  on  a  materialistic  and  capitalistic 
basis.  What  the  methods  of  doing  so  will  be  ;  whether 
the  values  of  the  old  world  shall  be  transmitted  to  the 
new  ;  and  whether  indeed  a  new  cosmos  can  be  created 
out  of  the  present  chaos  remains  to  be  seen.  It  will  depend 
largely  upon  whether  Christianity  and  the  Church  have 
sufficient  moral  and  spiritual  energy  to  repeat  in  a  better 
and  more  spiritual  way  what  they  did  with  Europe  at 
least  twice  before — but  without  repeating  their  failures 
in  those  cases.  That  again  depends  largely  upon  whether 
the  Church  is  capable  of  handling  the  Word  of  God  in  the 
New  Testament  aright. 


3 

THE  MODERN  SITUATION  AND  ITS  MEANING 

The  Modern  Tasks  and  Needs 

That  Christianity  is  now  facing  a  new  and  an  in- 
finitely more  difficult  and  more  complicated  situation 
than  ever  before  is  a  point  that  need  not  be  laboured. 
For  the  first  time  in  its  history  it  is  face  to  face  with  a 
world-crisis  and  not  a  local  one.  All  the  previous  efforts 
of  the  Church  seem  only  child's  play  compared  with  the 
problems  before  Christianity  at  present.  Catastrophic  as 
it  was,  the  European  War  has  made  no  essential  change 
in  the  situation.  It  has  changed  only  some  of  the  external 
conditions  and  cleared  out  of  the  way  some  of  the  stage- 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       291 

properties  which  were  hiding  from  men  the  brutaUty  and 
sordidness  of  the  grim  struggle  for  life  always  going  on 
behind  the  scenes.  It  has  only  made  personal  problems 
especially  more  acute  and  urgent,  and  revealed  to  every  eye 
the  naked  framework  around  which  the  outward  structure 
of  the  old  society  was  jerry-built. 

The  main  question  for  us  is  what  does  the  new  genera- 
tion need  in  order  to  reconstruct  its  personal  and  social 
world  almost  from  the  foundations  ?  What  specific  help 
can  Christianity  and  the  Church  give  in  order  to  supply 
those  needs  effectively  and  honourably  ? 

Amidst  all  its  multitudinous  plans,  it  is  plain  that  the 
world  is  almost  bankrupt  of  clear  ideas  and  dominant 
principles,  of  strong  convictions  and  moral  and  spiritual 
ideals.  Some  fragments  and  remnants  of  values  it  has 
probably  rescued  from  its  past,  and  perhaps  bled  out  of 
its  recent  experiences.  But  even  these  lie  in  a  confused 
heap  and  need  to  be  arranged,  classified  and  completed 
in  order  to  become  the  nucleus  of  a  faith.  To  what  extent 
can  the  Church  help  men  to  do  even  this  work  and  baptize 
with  the  Holy  Spirit  of  power  these  fragmentary  and 
broken  lights  of  convictions  and  ideals  ? 

The  Church  and  the  New  Testament 

So  far  as  has  yet  appeared,  the  Christian  Church  has 
in  its  spiritual  possession  or  under  its  moral  guardianship 
nothing  much  except  the  New  Testament  worth  offering 
to  men  and  nations  for  the  purpose  of  building  up  a  new 
world.  And  even  that,  before  it  can  be  given  effectively 
to  the  world,  needs  to  be  reread,  marked  and  inwardly 
digested  by  the  Church  itself.  The  Church  as  well  as  the 
world  needs  to  be  educated  into  it.  Perhaps  the  most 
serious  question  of  the  day  is  whether  it  is  a  gift  still 
worth  the  giving,  and  whether  it  is  worth  while  conse- 
crating the  energies  of  the  whole  Church  to  the  task  of 
educating  itself  and  the  world  into  the  spirit  and  principles 
of  the  New  Testament. 

It  is  certainly  true  that  the  New  Testament  is  the 
pecuHar  heritage  of  the  Church  and  needs  the  Church 
in  some  form  for  its  effective  propagation.-.    Indeed,  one 


292    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

of  the  most  courageous  things  ever  done  by  the  Christian 
Church  was  to  set  the  New  Testament  in  its  very  midst 
as  the  final  standard  and  judge  of  its  hfe — shamed  though 
the  Church  has  continually  been  by  its  very  presence. 
The  question  is,  has  the  Church  the  courage  still  to  believe 
whole-heartedly  in  the  New  Testament  Gospel  and  to 
teach  it  in  its  fulness  and  purity  ?  And  if  the  Church 
has  sufficient  faith  to  let  the  New  Testament  have  its 
own  revolutionary  way  with  men,  to  what  extent  can 
the  New  Testament  still  supply  the  deep  needs  of  men 
and  the  world  at  the  present  time  ? 

There  is  only  one  answer  to  this  question,  and  that  is 
— better  than  ever.  The  needs  of  the  world  have  now 
more  than  ever  come  within  the  range  of  its  essential 
Gospel.  The  points  of  contact  between  those  needs  and 
the  peculiar  message  and  power  of  the  New  Testament 
are  closer  than  they  ever  were.  It  is  not  only  that  the 
Gospel  because  of  its  specifically  ethical  and  spiritual 
purpose  and  content  can  take  the  suffering  human  race 
and  with  unerring  finger  probe  each  ailing  spot.  It  is 
also  the  case  that  the  very  process  through  which  the 
mind  and  heart  of  the  world  seems  to  be  passing  is  the 
typical  movement  represented  in  the  New  Testament. 
Moreover,  the  main  ideals,  the  remnants  of  which  the 
world  is  weakly  trying  to  rescue  from  the  ruins  of  its 
past,  and  the  spiritual  convictions  for  which  it  is  groping, 
are  the  very  ideals,  values  and  convictions  which  the 
New  Testament  expresses  most  clearly  and  incorporates 
most  powerfully.  They  are  those  which  make  up  its 
essence  and  reveal  its  peculiar  character  most  thoroughly 
and  fully  among  the  faiths  of  the  world. 

Essence  of  the  Modern  Struggle 

A  very  brief  consideration  of  what  seems  to  be  happen- 
ing all  around  us  may  help  to  make  this  clear.  If  the 
world  is  not  destined  to  go  to  pieces  altogether,  it  is  now 
growing  out  of  an  individualistic  period  and  is  groping 
after  a  new  communal  reconstruction  of  its  hfe.  We  are 
witnessing  the  struggle  between  these  two  ideals  both  in 
the  hearts  and  minds  of  men  and  in  the  life  of  the  world 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       293 

at  large.  The  latter  is  the  hope  of  the  future  and  the 
former  is  the  heritage  of  the  past.  The  two  principles 
are  at  enmity  because  they  are  at  present  both  held  in 
crude  and  imperfect  forms.  Men  are,  however,  every- 
where vaguely  conscious  that  both  the  free  personality 
and  the  ordered  human  community  are  necessary.  The 
political  and  economic  period  which  has  already  reached 
and  passed  its  climax  encouraged  the  growth  of  personal 
freedom  and  individual  initiative  in  its  own  way  and  for 
its  own  purpose.  But  within  a  capitalistic  system  this 
ideal  was  bound  in  the  end  to  starve  for  lack  of  susten- 
ance, for  it  was  cut  off  from  its  base  in  the  moral  and  re- 
ligious conviction  of  the  supreme  value  of  every  individual 
before  God.  Nevertheless,  in  a  mutilated  form  it  did 
somehow  represent  an  ideal  necessary  for  human  welfare. 
The  co-operative  principle,  on  the  other  hand,  is  at 
present  being  forced  upon  us  simply  by  the  logic  of  external 
events,  and  the  world  is  attempting  to  give  it  a  body 
without  a  life-giving  spirit  and  soul.  That  soul  it  can 
only  find  in  moral  conviction  and  a  religious  faith  as 
universal  as  the  co-operative  commonwealth  it  seeks  to 
establish. 


THE  PERSONAL  AND  SOCIAL  IDEAL  OF 
THE  GOSPEL 

The  future  will  largely  depend  upon  whether  men  can 
find  a  larger  and  more  powerful  ideal  which  will  not  only 
purify  and  complete  both  these  values,  but  also  help  to 
hold  them  together  side  by  side,  and  still  more  to  combine 
them  essentially  and  in  principle. 

The  Ideals  of  the  Gospel 

Our  interpretation  of  the  New  Testament  has  been  a 
failure  if  it  has  not  revealed  the  fact  that  this  is  the  very 
heart  of  its  Gospel  and  its  power — expressed  in  many 
different  forms,  but  found  in  all  its  classical  presentations 
in    the    New    Testament.     Everywhere    it    implies    and 


294    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

demands  the  moral  freedom  and  independence  of  the 
individual  for  the  sake  of  the  healthy  growth  of  the 
human  community  ;  and  the  creation  of  a  universal 
community  for  the  sake  of  the  healthy  growth  of  the 
free  moral  personality.  It  is  a  synthesis  of  freedom  and 
obedience,  a  personal  appeal  and  the  social  call  of  love. 
We  have  already  seen  in  how  many  ways  this  combination 
may  be  and  has  been  expressed. 

In  the  Christian  Gospel,  also,  these  two  ideals  are 
not  simply  loosely  held  side  by  side,  but  united  in 
principle  on  the  basis  of  the  universal  Fatherhood  of 
God.  Both  its  supreme  valuation  of  personality  and 
its  idea  of  a  universal  community  become  thus  abso- 
lutely indestructible. 

It  is  mainly  for  this  reason  that  a  central  place  in  the 
present  and  future  education  of  the  race  can  be  vindicated 
for  the  New  Testament  as  the  classical  record  of  this 
Gospel.  It  sets  before  the  eyes  of  men  an  ideal  for  their 
personal  and  social  life  which  stands  above  and  beyond 
all  the  accidents  of  time  and  place — an  intrinsic  value 
within  which  all  other  values  worth  preserving  can  find 
their  place  as  instrumental  to  its  ends. 

This  is  the  main  thing,  for  the  sake  of  which  we  have 
a  right  to  use  the  New  Testament.  It  is,  however,  very 
probable  that  once  we  have  learnt  to  use  it  so,  the  New 
Testament  will  also  bring  us  what  may  still  remain  as 
the  most  universal  and  appropriate  expression  of  these 
values  in  the  personality  of  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ  on  the 
one  hand  and  His  message  of  the  Kingdom  of  God  on 
the  other  hand  ;  while  the  peculiar  contributions  of  the 
different  parts  of  the  New  Testament  towards  the  ex- 
plication and  application  of  this  ideal  will  help  to  clarify 
and  fill  out  its  meaning.  We  may  even  find  in  the  New 
Testament  before  the  end  many  suggestions  for  its  pro- 
gressive realization  as  well  as  many  warnings  of  the 
dangers  to  which  it  is  exposed  in  its  struggles  for  incor- 
poration in  actual  life. 

It  is  true  that  terms  like  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ  and 
the  Kingdom  of  God  have  a  long  history  and  come  to  us 
with  many  associations  which  we  have  no  desire  to  pre- 
serve, but  they  are  still  probably  the  least  soiled  of  all 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       295 

the  terms  into  which  historical  ideals  have  been  pre- 
cipitated, and  also  those  that  will  continue  to  make  the 
most  direct  and  powerful  appeal  to  men. 


Jesus  Christ  and  the  Kingdom  of  God 

Their  history  has  in  many  ways  enriched  and  purified 
their  content  and  widened  their  scope,  but  they  still 
retain  in  the  minds  of  men  an  essential  contact  and 
continuity  with  their  meaning  in  the  New  Testament. 
This  is  very  much  more  so  in  their  case  than  with  regard 
to  such  categories  as  John's  Logos  or  Paul's  Son  of  God 
or  the  Synoptic  Messiah.  The  Lordship  of  Jesus  Christ 
is  much  more  capable  of  having  poured  into  it  a  modern 
content  in  line  with  its  essential  New  Testament  meaning, 
than  any  other  historical  description  of  Jesus. 

It  is  true  that  an  interpretation  to  meet  modern 
needs  must  be  much  more  exclusively  in  terms  of 
personality,  moral  character  and  moral  authority  than 
is  the  case  in  any  New  Testament  presentation  of  Him. 
The  New  Testament  itself,  however,  provides  us  with 
plenty  of  material  for  doing  so,  especially  in  the  Synoptic 
Gospels. 

The  modern  associations  of  the  Kingdom  of  God  are 
also,  of  course,  far  more  evolutionary,  secular  and  human 
than  are  its  associations  in  the  New  Testament ;  but  for 
the  most  part  these  new  associations  do  no  injustice  to 
its  essential  purpose  and  spirit.  The  New  Testament 
itself  clearly  suggests  them  in  many  ways,  and  points  to 
the  transformation  of  the  primitive  crude  catastrophic 
eschatology  into  a  permanent  and  continuous  divine 
guidance  culminating  periodically  in  critical  episodes. 
The  idea  of  the  future  Kingdom  of  God  may  have  been 
sometimes  used  in  the  New  Testament  and  later  in  order 
to  deny  and  to  devaluate  human  effort  and  the  ordinary 
work  of  the  world,  but  that  is  no  part  of  its  essential 
motive  or  content.  In  itself  it  is  the  final  realization  of 
the  Eternal  in  time,  and  part,  at  least,  of  its  intention  is 
to  quicken  the  powers  and  efforts  of  men,  and  to  strengthen 
their  souls  to  endure  long  waiting  in  the  certain  faith 
that  there  is  a  final,  absolute  meaning  and  purpose  in  all 


296    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

human  effort  and  work.     In  it  the  life  to  come  becomes 
the  energizing  spirit  of  the  present  time. 


Different  Expressions  of  the  Ideal 

We  may  express  our  ultimate  ideal  in  many  ways — in 
personal  and  social  categories,  in  educational,  political 
and  economic  terms,  borrowed  from  the  philosophers 
of  Greece,  or  the  Hebrew  prophets,  created  by  modern 
science  or  philosophy ;  but  it  does  not  seem  that  we  have 
yet  found  any  categories  so  capable  of  becoming  the 
bearers  of  all  that  our  ultimate  personal  and  social  ideals 
can  and  ought  to  mean  for  us  as  those  produced  by  the 
experience  behind  the  New  Testament  and  incorporated 
in  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ  and  His  message  of  the  Kingdom 
of  God.  No  others  are  so  comprehensive  and  so  adapt- 
able. No  others  have  carried  with  them  and  in  them  so 
many  of  the  intrinsic  values  of  the  past  and  are  so  full 
of  possibilities  for  the  future.  The  Fatherhood  of  God, 
the  Brotherhood  of  man,  love,  freedom,  the  Church,  the 
Commonwealth  of  nations,  Socialism,  and  a  host  of  others 
have  their  peculiar  merits  for  certain  particular  purposes, 
but  they  all  in  some  degree  or  other  lack  the  fulness,  or 
attractive  power,  or  the  touch  with  universal  humanity,  or 
the  definiteness  which  should  stamp  the  bearers  of  the 
ultimate  values  and  ideals  of  the  human  race.  It  is 
certain  that  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ  and  the  Kingdom  of 
God  have  struck  and  do  strike  a  note  of  appeal  to  many 
more  hearts,  minds  and  consciences  than  any  other  words 
in  human  history. 

Value    of  the  Historical  Picture  of  Jesus 

The  very  terms  themselves  suggest  that  the  element 
in  the  New  Testament  which  the  world  at  present  needs, 
and  with  which  it  has  already  most  points  of  contact,  is 
to  be  found  in  the  Synoptic  Gospels.  The  characteristic 
thing  about  the  Synoptic  presentation  is  not  its  theology 
nor  even  its  religious  faith,  but  the  fact  that  it  has  pre- 
served the  historical  picture  of  Jesus  Christ,  the  moral 
appreciation  of  His  human  greatness,  and   His  insistent 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       297 

proclamation  of  the  Kingdom  of  God.  Historically  there 
can  be  very  little  doubt  that  the  Church  would  soon  have 
been  overwhelmed  in  the  Christological  controversies  if 
the  ineradicable  picture  of  Jesus  Christ  had  not  always 
called  men  back  to  sober  reality,  and  if  that  real  Jesus  had 
not  continuall}''  of  Himself  shown  men  the  way  into  the 
Kingdom  of  God. 

And  to-day,  again,  it  would  seem  as  if  almost  the  only 
hope  for  the  world's  life  is  to  make  the  historical  Jesus 
real  to  men — Himself  and  His  Kingdom  of  God  as  one 
whole.  That  is,  indeed,  almost  the  only  point  of  genuine 
and  spontaneous  contact  between  Christianity  and  the 
majority  of  men.  The  comprehensive  report  of  the  Arch- 
bishop of  Canterbury's  Committee  on  the  religion  of  the 
British  Army  in  France  ^  is  sufficient  evidence  of  that 
fact.  Church,  Creed  and  Ritual  have  lost  their  power. 
There  is  left,  we  are  told,  besides  the  very  vague  background 
of  religion,  only  some  reverence  for  the  figure  of  Jesus. 

It  is  evident,  therefore,  that  in  order  to  supply  the 
need  of  the  time,  we  have  to  start  where  the  life  behind 
the  New  Testament  starts,  namely,  with  the  attempt  to 
renew  effectively  a  personal  familiarity  with  Jesus  as 
the  Friend  and  Teacher  of  men.  Our  dealing  must  be, 
first  of  all,  frankly  and  wholeheartedly  with  the  human 
Jesus,  and  we  must  build  up  an  historical  picture  worthy 
of  their  reverence  in  the  minds  and  hearts  of  men.  We 
can  do  it  with  the  certain  hope  that  that,  as  of  old,  will 
exercise  its  wonted  charm  and  power,  leading  men  on 
gradually  to  the  reconstruction  of  Christian  thinking,  and 
in  the  end  guiding  their  personal  and  social  action. 

This  is  not  only  what  men  at  present  most  need,  but 
this  historical  picture  of  Jesus  Christ  is  incomparably  the 
most  significant  contribution  made  to  the  world  now  and 
always  by  the  New  Testament. 

Contributions  of  Paul  and  John 

Nevertheless,  it  is  well  that  this  history  is  not  the 
only  element  in  the  Christian  writings.  History  can 
become  a  tyrant,  and  there  is  such  a  thing  as  slavery  to 

^Dr.  Cairns,  The  Army  and  Religion.     London,  1919. 


298    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

past  events.  The  New  Testament  itself  provides  the 
antidote  to  that  in  the  rehgious  appreciation  and  the 
theological  constructions  of  the  Synoptic  Gospels,  of  Paul 
and  of  John. 

To  what  are  less  central  factors  in  the  needs  of  modern 
days,  these  typical  presentations  of  Christ  have  also, 
as  we  have  seen,  something  of  importance  still  to  say. 
Paul  and  the  Johannine  writer  were  face  to  face  with  the 
Hellenistic  craving  for  salvation  through  occult  practices, 
crude  pantomimes  of  the  processes  of  nature,  esoteric 
doctrines,  elaborate  ritual,  the  external  authority  of  well- 
organized  hierarchies  and  the  worship  of  the  State.  These 
cravings  are  by  no  means  yet  dead,  and  the  New  Testament 
therefore  may  still  have  a  very  pertinent  message  in  view 
of  the  modern  frantic  hunt  for  quack  remedies  in  Christian 
Science,  Spiritism,  Buddhism,  and  many  other  worse 
substitutes  for  a  faith  that  requires  constant  ethical  effort 
and  the  exercise  of  strenuous  thinking. 

The  word  of  John,  too,  is  still  in  season  for  those  who 
take  refuge  from  the  slings  and  arrows  of  outrageous 
fortune  by  postulating  an  irrational  and  unintelligible 
universe  or  in  brutal  force  ;  and  also  for  those  who  worship 
tradition  as  divine  in  Creed  and  Church  and  State  at  the 
cost  of  quenching  the  progressive  and  holy  Spirit  of  God 
"  who  shall  lead  you  into  all  truth." 

We  have  already  discussed  from  another  point  of  view 
other  elements  of  permanent  value  in  the  Letters  of  Paul 
and  the  Johannine  literature,  and  they  all  help  to  give  the 
full  New  Testament  contribution  to  an  adequate  presenta- 
tion of  Jesus  Christ  and  the  Kingdom  of  God  as  an  ideal 
that  may  still  legitimately  sway  the  modern  mind  and  life. 

5 

THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  DEMAND 

The  Gospel  Complete  in  Principle 

It  is  only  with  a  deep  consciousness  of  the  urgent 
need  for  this  Gospel,  and  with  absolute  confidence  in  the 
central  significance  of  its  contribution,  that  the  Christian 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       299 

teacher  can  face  with  the  necessary  courage  and  patience 
the  whole  task  of  teaching  the  New  Testament.  It  is 
a  task  which  must  begin  early,  lasts  long  and  is  never 
finished  from  one  generation  to  another.  Jesus  Christ 
and  the  Kingdom  of  God  are  centres  of  possibilities  even 
more  than  they  are  records  of  accomplishments. 

In  one  sense  it  is  true  that  this  message  of  the  New 
Testament  is  complete  in  itself,  namely,  in  so  far  as  it 
reveals  and  energizes  the  spirit,  fundamental  principles 
and  permanent  values  of  life.  The  only  possible  doubt 
that  can  arise  in  this  connection  is  whether  it  implies  such 
a  positive  valuation  of  human  effort,  work  and  civilization 
in  general  as  we  must  have  to  make  life  in  the  world  worth 
living.  But  if  there  is  indeed  such  a  gap  in  the  New 
Testament,  it  has  long  ago  been  filled  by  Martin  Luther 
and  the  Protestant  Reformation  in  their  almost  extra- 
vagant emphasis  upon  the  sanctification  of  all  human 
*  callings  '  as  the  only  real  worship  of  God  and  the  only 
direct  expression  of  Christian  love  to  God  and  man. 

Complete  as  the  message  of  the  New  Testament  may 
be,  however,  in  the  spirit  and  attitude  it  reveals,  it  is 
manifestly  only  a  very  incomplete  answer  to  many  of  the 
world's  urgent  needs.  It  is  manifestly  incomplete  even 
in  its  examples  of  the  practical,  personal  and  social 
applications  which  its  very  faith  demands — as  well  as  in 
its  guidance  with  regard  to  them. 

The  New  Testament  limited  in  the  Application 
OF  the  Gospel 

Whole  regions  of  the  personal  and  social  life  were 
outside  its  horizon  ;  and  inevitably  so  was  the  whole 
realm  of  the  modern  ecclesiastical,  educational,  political 
and  economic  situation  together  with  the  worlds  of  modern 
Science  and  Art  in  which  the  Christian  spirit  must  some- 
how make  its  home  and  to  which  the  principles  of  the 
Christian  Gospel  must  somehow  be  applied.  The 
Christian  teacher  must  not  even  make  the  slightest 
suggestion  that  the  New  Testament  can  or  intends  to 
bring  anything  like  the  complete  material  for  the  solution 
of  the  intricate  problems  involved  in  the  reconstruction 


300    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

of  these  realms.  It  will  be  quite  enough  if  he  can  con- 
vince men  that  it  is  only  in  the  spirit  of  the  Gospel  and  in 
the  light  of  its  principles  that  their  solution  can  be  hope- 
fully attempted. 

For  the  building  up  of  the  family  life  on  Christian  lines, 
for  the  organization  of  a  Christian  State,  for  the  creation 
of  a  just  industrial  order,  for  the  provision  of  a  system  of 
education  adequate  for  all  modern  needs,  and  for  the 
growth  of  a  Christian  Church  which  shall  be  an  effective 
instrument  of  the  Gospel — for  all  these  purposes  and  many 
others  the  world  is  in  urgent  need  of  new  ideas  as  well  as 
a  Christian  spirit,  of  new  organizing  methods  as  well  as 
moral  and  spiritual  convictions,  of  an  inventive  and 
courageous  intelligence  as  well  as  a  sensitive  conscience. 
There  is  no  magician's  wand  which  can  produce  all  these 
things  out  of  the  New  Testament.  The  world  must  look 
elsewhere  for  them  and  tax  to  the  utmost  all  the  re- 
sources of  modern  Education,  modern  Science,  modern 
Philosophy,  the  history  and  experience  of  Industry,  State 
and  Church  as  well  as  the  Christian  Gospel,  in  order  to 
produce  them. 

Ultimately  the  faithful  teaching  of  the  New  Testament 
itself  creates  an  imperative  demand  for  them — a  demand, 
indeed,  so  urgent  as  often  to  help  effectively  in  the  pro- 
vision of  the  means  for  its  own  realization. 


THE  CHRISTIAN  CHURCH  IN  THE  MODERN 
WORLD 

The  Gospel  needs  the  Church 

One  thing  alone  out  of  this  realm  of  the  modern 
application  of  the  Gospel  claims  a  closing  word  in  a  dis- 
cussion of  the  New  Testament  in  modern  Education,  and 
that  is,  the  demand  of  the  Gospel  for  a  Church  as  its 
peculiar  organ  and  the  instrument  of  its  propagation. 
The  power  of  the  Christian  Gospel  grows  with  and  out 
of  its  incorporation  in  personal  life.     It  is  the  witness  of 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       301 

history  that  to  keep  ahve  and  to  promote  the  growth 
of  the  rehgious  spirit  needs  some  kind  of  organized  com- 
munity which  progressively  and  spontaneously  generates 
it.  A  religion  of  the  spirit  needs  such  incorporation 
more  than  any  other,  and  it  needs  a  community  the 
definite  end  and  aim  of  whose  existence  is  the  creation, 
the  fostering  and  propagation  of  that  spirit — a  community 
distinguished  from,  and  in  its  life  independent  of,  all  other 
societies  and  organizations  living  alongside  of  it  in  the 
world.  The  moral  and  spiritual  independence  of  the 
Christian  Church  is,  indeed,  of  its  essence  as  the  organ 
of  the  Gospel  of  the  New  Testament.  Possessing  and 
possessed  by  the  life  of  the  Gospel,  how  can  it  possibly  be 
otherwise  than  independent  and  supreme  in  its  authority. 

How  can  the  Christian  Church,  for  instance,  cling  to 
the  State  and  mould  itself  upon  the  stereotyped  forms 
of  the  State  and  submit  the  claims  of  the  Gospel  to  its 
revision  ? 

Why  should  the  theology  whose  business  it  is  to  inter- 
pret that  Gospel  be  subordinated  to  the  categories  of  a 
pagan  philosophic  speculation  ?  Why  should  its  ethics 
be  mutilated  to  fit  the  terminology  of  ancient  Greece  ? 

Is  the  Christian  life  in  ideal  or  motive  the  supreme 
and  ultimate  life,  or  is  it  not  ?  If  it  is,  then  it  must 
ultimately  find  its  own  independent  expression  in  organiza- 
tion and  thought,  be  propagated  by  means  consonant 
with  itself,  and  reign  supreme,  spiritually  and  morally,  by 
setting  the  standard  for  State,  Philosophy  and  Industry. 

The  Church  and  Gospel  for  the  World's  Need 

The  world  indeed,  in  spite  of  all  its  perversities, 
failures  and  sins,  is  waiting  for  that  Church  which  shall 
make  itself  simply  and  solely  the  organ  of  the  Gospel  of 
the  New  Testament  at  any  cost.  In  every  direction  men 
are  groping  in  the  dark  for  light  upon  the  ultimate  things, 
and  even  the  greatest  triumphs  of  the  modern  world  end 
in  urgent  questions.  Modern  Science  has  searched  the 
material  universe  for  its  secrets,  and  seems  to  be  coming 
nearer  and  nearer  to  the  point  where  spirit  bursts  through 
the  veil  of  flesh,  revealing  more  and  more  the  supremacy 


302    THE  NEW  TESTAMENT  IN  MODERN  EDUCATION 

of  mind  over  matter.  But  what  mind  and  what  spirit  ? 
Is  it  that  which  harnesses  the  powers  of  nature  to  the 
brutal  and  ruthless  chariots  of  war,  or  the  spirit  of  co- 
operation and  love  ? 

Modern  History  has  searched  the  remains  of  the 
hidden  civilizations  of  man,  and  found  that  he  has  never 
been  able  to  live  and  work  without  some  kind  of  religion. 
But  what  religion  is  the  fitting  mate  of  man  ?  Is  it  to 
be  the  crude  superstitions  of  a  revived  Animism  and 
Fetishism,  or  the  counterpart  of  a  tribal  egoism,  or  is  it 
to  be  the  ethical  spiritual  life  of  the  Gospel,  the  free 
obedience  of  the  equal  children  of  God  all  over  the  world  ? 

Modern  Philosophy  has  probed  the  mind  and  heart 
and  will  of  man  and  society,  and  has  met  God  below  the 
threshold  of  consciousness,  or  in  the  moral  imperative, 
or  in  the  bonds  of  the  community.  But  what  God  is  it 
that  works  above,  below,  within,  without  ?  Is  it  a  bhnd 
force  or  an  irrational  energy,  or  the  Heavenly  Father  of 
the  Gospel  ? 

Modern  Education  has  looked  far  into  the  possibilities 
of  the  future  and  marked  the  presence  of  the  ideal  as  the 
universal  condition  of  human  development.  But  what 
kind  of  ideal  is  it  to  be — the  good  workman,  the  good 
Englishman,  or  a  world  of  free  moral  personalities  in  love 
with  God  and  man,  such  as  the  Gospel  implies  ? 

These  are  the  most  urgent  questions  in  the  world  of 
to-day.  Men  no  longer  question  the  reality  of  spirit, 
the  necessity  of  religion,  the  existence  of  God,  the  power 
of  the  ideal,  but  they  are  groping  for  the  answer  to  the 
question  of  what  spirit,  what  religion,  what  God  and 
what  ideal  ? 

To  all  of  them  the  Christian  Church  has  the  answer 
in  the  New  Testament,  but  an  answer  which  the  Church 
as  a  whole  has  not  yet  had  the  courage  and  the  patience 
and  the  faith  to  give  effectively  and  whole-heartedly. 
There  is,  however,  no  adequate  teaching  of  the  New 
Testament  which  does  not  in  some  way  ring  out  the  only 
answer  now  possible  ;  and  there  is  no  adequate  Church 
which  does  not  in  some  way  attempt  seriously  to  live, 
and  to  justify  its  proclamation,  in  the  spirit  and  in  the 
terms  of  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ  and  the  Kingdom  of  God. 


JESUS  CHRIST  AND  THE  KINGDOM  OF  GOD       303 

BOOKS 

Baldwin  (J.  M.). — The  Individual  and  Society.     (London,  191 1.) 
Bartlet   (J.   V.)  and   Carlyle   (A.    J.)- — Christianity   in   History. 

(London,  1917.) 
BoussET  (W.). — The  Faith  of  a  Modern  Protestant.     (London,  1907.) 
Cairns  (D.  S.). — The  Army  and  Religion.     (London,  1919.) 
Carter  (H.). — The  Church  and  the  New  Age.     (London,  19 12.) 
Clutton-Brock  (A.). — Studies  in  Christianity.     (London,  1918.) 
Figgis  (J.  N.). — Civilization  at  the  Cross  Roads.     (Cambridge,  1907.) 
FosDiCK    (H.    E.). — The    Challenge   of  the   Present   Crisis.     (London, 

1917.) 
Garnett  (J.  C.  1\L). — Education  and  World  Citizenship.     (Cambridge, 

1921.) 
Glover    (T.    R.). — The     Christian     Tradition    and    its     Verification. 

(London,  191 3.) 
Hall  (A.). — Jesus  and  Christianity  in  the  Twentieth  Century.     (London, 

1915.) 
Hobhouse  (W.). — The  Church  and  the  World  in  Idea  and  in  History. 

(London,  19 16.) 
HoDGKiN  (H.  T.). — Lay  Religion.     (London,  1918.) 
Hogg  (A.  G.)- — Christ's  Message  of  the  Kingdom.     (Edinburgh,  191 1.) 
HoRNE  (Silvester). — The  Ministry  of  the  Modern  Church.     (London, 

1907.) 
Mackintosh    (H.    R.). — The    Originality    of   the    Christian    Message. 

(London,  1920.) 
Peabody  (F.  G.). — The  Christian  Life  in  the  Modern  World.     (New 

York,  1 916.) 
Peile  (J.  H.  F.). — The  Reproach  of  the  Gospel.     (London,  1907.) 
Rauschenbusch    (W.). — Christianity    and    the    Social    Crisis.     (New 

York,  1907.)     Christianizing  the  Social  Order.     (New  York,  191 2.) 
Temple  (W.). — The  Kingdom  of  God.     (London,  1912.) 
Troeltsch     (E.). — Protestantism     and     Progress.      (London,     191 2.) 

Die  Soziallehren  der  christlichen  Kirchen  und  Gruppen.     (Tiibingen, 

1912.) 
Tyrrell  (G.). — Christianity  at  the  Cross  Roads.     (London,  19 10.) 
Weinel  (H.). — Jesus  in  the  Twentieth  Century.     (Edinburgh,  1910.) 
The   Challenge  of  the  Modern  Situation.     (Free  Church   Fellowship.) 

The  Way  Forward  for  the  Church.     (London,  1921.)     The  Teaching 

Office  of  the  Church.     (London,  191 8.)     Christianity  and  Industrial 

Problems.     (London,  191 8.) 


PRINTED  IN   GREAT    BRITAIN 

BY    MORRISON    AND   GIBB   LTD. 

EDINBURGH 


Date  Due 

N  14'3 

i 

FACULT 

/ 

U  2  6  '3C 

1 

^