(logo)
(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Open Source Books | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections

Search: Advanced Search

Anonymous User (login or join us)Upload
See other formats

Full text of "The New Testament in modern education"

THE NEW TESTAMENT 

IN 

MODERN EDUCATION 



J. 



THE NEW TESTAMENT 

IN 

MODERN EDUCATION 



BY 



]. MORGAN JONES, M.A. 

PROFESSOR OF CHURCH HISTORY AND RELIGIOUS EDUCATION 
INDEPENDENT COLLEGE, BANGOR 



9 



HODDER AND STOUGHTON 
LIMITED LONDON 



TO 

MY WIFE 

AND TO 

OUR THREE CHILDREN 



iv 



PREFACE 

RECENT events have undoubtedly brought a great increase 
of interest in the significance of Morality and Religion for 
Education. The Science and Art of religious Education 
are, however, still in their infancy. The most fundamental 
problems still await scientific discussion and a practical 
solution. The specific features of the educational ideal, 
the definite value and application of psychological study 
and its results both personal and social the educational 
significance of Religion and Theology, the relation between 
Home, School and Church as educational agencies, and 
many similar questions still represent difficulties that 
have not been overcome. 

Rather unfortunately, almost exclusive attention has 
been given to the elaboration of educational methods, to 
the comparative neglect of the content and material of 
moral and religious instruction. The latter, however, 
must become our primary study, for how we teach must 
in the end depend upon what we want to teach. 

So far the Bible and that the mediaeval Bible has 
been taken for granted in educational discussion, but in 
reality it presents a problem of ultimate significance. 
After all, why should we, in the schools of the twentieth 
century, teach, as an important element in our instruction, 
the literature and history of an ancient Semitic race or the 
fugitive writings of a little group of Hellenistic religious 
enthusiasts of the first century ? On the face of it such 
a question demands a far more thorough and scientific 
discussion than has yet been given to it. Our very right 
to live comfortably in the modern world as distinguished 
from the Middle Ages depends upon the answer we give 
to it. 

The following chapters are intended as a contribution 
to this initial educational discussion of the Biblical material 
in so far as it concerns the New Testament. The first part 
of the book deals with the relation between religious and 
modern education generally ; with the results and signi- 
ficance of modern Biblical study for the teacher ; with 
the educational interpretation of the material of the New 
Testament ; with its place and use in the process of 



vi THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

education ; and with the specific task of the teacher of 
the New Testament. The second part discusses the main 
particular problems involved in teaching the New Testa- 
ment dealing in turn with the Life, Personality and 
Teaching of Jesus Christ (special chapters being devoted 
to the Parables and the Miracles) ; with the Life and 
Letters of the Apostle Paul ana with the Johannine 
Literature, while the last chapter attempts to summarize 
the meaning of the whole discussion and to give a com- 
prehensive appreciation of the specific educational values 
of the New Testament in relation to the needs and interests 
of our modern world. 

Among the needs of the day is the need for intelligent 
mediators between the Biblical expert and the educational 
thinker mediators who will also attempt to interpret 
both these to the studious practical teacher. It will be 
seen that it is to this region that the following discussions 
belong. They all attempt to make some vital connection 
between the Christian Gospel of the New Testament as 
interpreted by Biblical scholars, and modern educational 
efforts in principle and practice. 

Naturally, no claim to originality is made for discussions 
of this kind, but it is hoped that they reveal throughout 
some intimate knowledge of what the scientific educators 
and of what the scientific theologians have to say. It is 
hoped that they also show the influence of a fairly long 
and useful experience of the actual difficulties and needs 
of modern teachers in the public schools, the Sunday 
Schools and other educational institutions. 

I am glad of the opportunity to acknowledge my debt 
to American writers like Dr. Stanley Hall and Professor 
G. A. Coe, as well as to numerous German writings, 
especially those of Professor F. Niebergall of Heidelberg. 
Much of the substance of two or three of the following 
chapters was published some years ago in The Christian 
Commonwealth, and I thank the proprietors for their kind 
consent to make use of it here. Some parts of the opening 
chapters were delivered as lectures at the Summer School 
of Biblical Instruction held at the Normal College, Bangor, 
in 1920. I feel very much indebted also to my friends, 
Principal Rees of the Independent College, Bangor, and 
the Rev. H. Harris-Hughes, Bangor, for reading the 
manuscript and for making many useful corrections and 
suggestions. 

INDEPENDENT COLLEGE, 
BANGOR, 

$th August 1922. 



CONTENTS 






PART I 

THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 



CHAPTER I 

PAGE 

THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION . . 3 



CHAPTER II 
THE NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER . . 24 

CHAPTER III 
THE PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION . . 44 

CHAPTER IV 
THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT . 63 

CHAPTER V 
THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT . . -79 

CHAPTER VI 
THE CHRISTIAN TEACHKR AND HIS TASK .... 104 



viii THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 



PART II 

TEACHING THE NEW TESTAMENT : ITS MAIN 
PROBLEMS 

CHAPTER VII 

PAGF 

THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD. . . 123 



CHAPTER VIII 

THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST FOR ADOLESCENCE . 145 

CHAPTER IX 
TEACHING THE PARABLES .... .161 

CHAPTER X 
THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES . . . . .181 

CHAPTER XI 
THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS . . . -203 

CHAPTER XII 
THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS . . . .226 

CHAPTER XIII 
THE JOHANNINE LITERATURE, THOUGHT AND LIFE . . 257 

CHAPTER XIV 
JESUS CHRIST AND THE KINGDOM OF GOD . . . .282 



PART I 
THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 





I. THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION. 

II. THE NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER. 
III. THE PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION. 
IV. THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. 

V. THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. 
VI. THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK. 



CHAPTER I 

THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 

1. Introductory. Christianity and the Modern Educational Movement. 

2. Educational Principles. Psychological Basis Periods of Moral 

and Religious Growth The Moral Aim of Education The 
Christian Ideal The Value of Systematic Instruction The 
Place of Religion in Education. 

3. Educational Methods. The Impressionist School The Method of 

Systematic Presentation The Method of Questioning The 
Need of Variety in Methods The Need of a New Spirit. 



INTRODUCTORY 

IT is only upon the background of Education in general 
that the place and significance of instruction in the New 
Testament can be properly appreciated. Life is one, and 
we must strive to gather all our educational efforts into 
some kind of unity. We fail indeed to appreciate one 
of the main contributions of Religion and of the New 
Testament if we miss their power to unify all life and 
education. On the other hand, the Christian teacher 
who does not bring his task into effective contact with 
the store of inspiration gathered for him by the modern 
educational movement starves himself in the land of 
plenty and devitalizes his material. He needs the modern 
educator as well as the Biblical scholar before he can 
fully enter into his own proper heritage. They also 
need what the Christian teacher alone can give them 
before they can find and perform their proper function 
in life. 

It is true that the voice of the great educators has often 
been smothered by the exigencies of politics and by the 
bickerings of the sects. In spite of that, however, their 



4 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

united message has become the common heritage of all 
civilized lands. All appearances to the contrary, there 
does now exist a more or less coherent body of educational 
principles to which all intelligent teachers confess their 
willing obedience, and which provides a working basis for 
all future effort. 

What is curious, if not tragic, in the history of modern 
education is that though this body of principles owes far 
more to the inspiration of the New Testament than to any 
other cause, yet it is the organized educational institu- 
tions of Christianity itself that have come least of all 
under the broadening influences of the great educators. 
On the other hand, it is quite as true that modern educa- 
tion has not yet by any means exhausted the inspiration 
which the Christian Gospel both in itself and in its history 
is capable of contributing to the common task of training 
men and nations. 

There is therefore a twofold task before the Christian 
Church in this connection. One is the task of assimilating 
modern educational principles and methods for the pur- 
poses of religious instruction. The other is the task of 
using the Christian Gospel more and more for the purpose 
of enriching the principles and practice of education in 
general. 

This discussion therefore starts with the willing con- 
fession that for us the fundamental principles which have 
sprung from the thought and activities of the great 
educators possess a general validity. Many of these 
principles have found rough expression in such well- 
known catch-phrases as ' respect for personality/ ' develop- 
ment from within,' ' development all round/ ' freedom 
through obedience/ ' many-sided interest/ ' learning by 
doing/ ' the concrete before the abstract/ ' no impression 
without expression/ ' educative instruction/ and many 
others of a similar character. It is true that these have 
been gathered from almost all schools of educational 
thought whose most enthusiastic disciples are still 
quarrelling over their exclusive claims to attention. The 
sober-minded teacher will, however, be ready to welcome 
them all as valuable contributions to the Science and Art 
of Education, and will give to none of them the exclusive 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 5 

right to dominate his theory and practice. As catch- 
words they are useful to remind him of the many varied 
elements that must enter into the process of making men 
and women. It has already been suggested that there 
is a definite historical reason why such principles and 
methods as these phrases imply should be more directly 
and effectively applicable to the teaching of morality and 
religion than to any other part of education. They have, 
as a matter of fact, been almost all directly suggested by 
the Christian Gospel itself. 



2 

EDUCATIONAL PRINCIPLES 

Some of these principles as being most germane to our 
purpose require a fuller discussion and definition. They 
concern the psychological basis of education, its moral 
end, the value of instruction and the central place of 
religion in it. 

PSYCHOLOGICAL BASIS OF EDUCATION 

i . There is no matter with regard to which we can 
count upon such general agreement as the appeal to human 
nature for guidance in the formulation of educational 
principles and methods. Nothing is so characteristic of 
modern education as the earnestness, persistence and 
enthusiasm with which it has carried on the study of the 
nature and growth of the child physically, intellectually 
and spiritually. If anything, its trust in the infallibility 
of the results of its psychological studies is in danger of 
becoming too absolute. We have not been reminded too 
often that we must know ' John ' thoroughly, if we want 
to teach him ' Latin.' There has, however, been some 
danger of forgetting that we must also know ' Latin/ 
and that no amount of psychological study will provide 
us with the intellectual material or the moral ideal with 
which we want to bring ' John ' into effective contact. 
Nevertheless, there can be no doubt that child-study in 



6 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

all its aspects represents by far the most fruitful factor 
in the triumph of the modern educational movement, 
and that in the results of that study, in spite of some 
vagaries, a vast amount of authentic material is now 
available for effective use in the practice of education. 

The study has already been and will be more and more 
a very healthy influence in the region of moral and 
religious instruction. We now fully realize, or we ought, 
at any rate, to have fully realized that it is neither the 
teacher nor the theology, neither the Church nor the 
Bible which should have the primary consideration, but 
the need and capacity of the child. The religious 
teacher, like every other, must reckon with heredity, 
temperament, varied capacities and interests. The soul 
is amenable to influence, and it is true that even 
ordinary people are capable of far greater things in 
the moral and religious life than we have dreamt. 
That, however, does not alter the fact that we cannot 
make a prophet or a religious genius at our will, any 
more than we can make a great musician or a great painter. 
We must not teach as if we expected all our pupils to reach 
the same high level of moral and religious experience as 
Paul or Augustine or Luther, nor must we expect them 
all to repeat the same type of experience. The Christian 
teacher is dealing with the same limitations set by 
heredity, temperament and capacity as all other teachers. 
He is also making use of the same psychological processes, 
while the formal educative movements of the inner life 
are much the same, whatever may be the ultimate end in 
view. The results of psychological study in these regions, 
the teacher of the New Testament must accept in common 
with all other teachers. 



PERIODS OF MORAL AND RELIGIOUS GROWTH 

It has also become clear that the child, in morality 
and religion as in all other aspects of his life, passes 
through definite and well-marked stages of growth and 
development in capacity and need. Before maturity is 
reached, the growing soul passes through three different 
levels of life which are often said with some truth to 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 7 

correspond more or less roughly with the gradual develop- 
ment of the race. They are Infancy (up to about seven 
years of age), Childhood (from about seven to twelve or 
thirteen) and Adolescence (lasting up to about twenty- 
four or twenty-five and often longer). The general 
features of these periods are also well known. We are 
here concerned with them only in so far as they bear more 
or less directly upon moral and religious instruction. 
From this point of view they are the wonder, the imitative 
and play instincts of Infancy ; the imagination and 
curiosity, the receptive memory, the personal interest, 
the growing historical sense, the demand for uniformity 
and the growing conscience of Childhood ; the self- 
assertion, the social interest, the greater intellectual under- 
standing and hero-worship ; the storm and stress, the 
reflection and idealism ; the constructive thought and 
sense of responsibility of Adolescence in its successive 
stages of early (twelve to fifteen), middle (fifteen to 
eighceen) and late (eighteen to twenty-four) youth. 

This educational Psychology has also brought a good 
deal of insight into the processes which are involved in 
the direction of instincts, the formation of habits, the 
growth of knowledge, the training of the moral judgment 
and the control of the will, though we have a long way 
yet to go before we can walk with any certainty in some 
of these directions. 

It is clear, therefore, that the organized agencies of 
moral and religious education, both in their ideals and 
methods, as well as in the use they make of the material 
at their disposal, lag far behind even our present imperfect 
scientific knowledge of child-life. A very great deal, 
however, still remains to be done before we have laid 
broad and firm the psychological basis of moral and 
religious education. To understand and make effective 
use of the needs and interests and values that dominate 
the lives of modern youths and adults in Church and out 
of it, in the town and in the country, in the Trade Union 
and in the office, at work, at school and at play will 
require a much more comprehensive, accurate and patient 
psychological study than has yet been dreamed of. We 
are really only at the very beginning of an educational 



8 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

psychology in any scientific sense. At its best, however, 
we must guard against making a fetish of child-study 
and its developments, for it can by no means give us 
everything that we need for our task. There will always 
be a margin of unexpectedness about the individual child 
which our general and average formulae will not cover, 
and which we must learn patiently to know and to value 
for itself in each case. Child-study may help us to 
enumerate and classify the motives, the interests, capacities 
and needs to which we can appeal. It may reveal to us 
the different reactions to be expected in answer to the 
influences we bring to bear upon the child or youth. It 
may enable us to analyse more and more accurately and 
fully the various elements and steps in the educative 
process. It may thus help us to realize that whatever 
end we may propose for our education must conform 
to certain fundamental characteristics of human nature, 
but it cannot possibly provide us with that end itself. 
It may give us guidance with regard to the forms into 
which we can put that end, but its real content we must 
get in some other way and by a far wider sweep than 
any mere Psychology can take. We must never be 
tempted to believe that we can spin out the aim and the 
moral ideal of education out of a mere analysis of the 
psychological processes. 

In fact, Education is not a circle with one centre, but 
an ellipse with two foci one of which is represented by 
the child, and the other the end for which he is to be 
trained. They, of course, must correspond with each 
other. That is why education can never be adequately 
described in terms of mere natural development, and we 
can never get rid of the element of direction and control 
from above, be the control as congenial and as unobtrusive 
as it may. The discussion of the ultimate end of education, 
therefore, is to some extent at least an independent study, and 
must have a place of its own in the Science of Education. 

THE MORAL AIM OF EDUCATION 

2. Modern educators are by this time in general agree- 
ment with regard to the moral nature of the ultimate aim 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 9 

in view. They would probably be ready to describe it 
as the formation and sustenance not simply of a full, 
rich, ideal human character, but rather of a fully developed, 
free personality in the case of each pupil a personality 
developed to the fullest extent, variety and wealth, of 
which the general and individual nature of each pupil is 
capable as a member of the human community. As 
usually expressed, this description requires more accurate 
definition, if not also an enlargement of its scope, to make 
it of real use. It is lacking in substance and content. 
We are at once brought face to face with the critical 
question of what kind of character and what type of 
personality our education is supposed to promote and 
guard. It is here that we are in urgent need of guidance, 
and it is here that most modern educational discussion 
leaves us in the lurch, and it is here also that we begin to 
hear the vital challenge of the Christian Religion. 

The prevalent idea seems to be that the ideal must 
of necessity be of this vague character, and that each 
individual must somehow or other choose his own ideal. 
The truth of this is, of course, that the educational aim 
must be plastic enough to allow of the utmost variety. 
It must, however, be variety within the range of some 
unity however wide, or it will become meaningless and 
dissolve into nothing. The real fact is that behind every 
fresh development of the Science of Education there has 
been a fairly consistent view of the character of the ideal 
even when it did not attain to definite expression. Still 
more is it the case that every great system of practical 
education has been consciously or unconsciously based 
upon some very definite conception of the ideal life and 
its qualities. It must always be so, whether educational 
theory provides such an ideal or not. Unfortunately, 
what has happened is that in the absence of any thorough 
discussion of the comparative value of conflicting ethical 
ideals, educational practice has seldom risen above the 
level of ' the good patriot/ ' the good citizen/ ' the good 
workman/ ' the English gentleman/ ( the good Catholic ' 
or ' the good Protestant.' 

Now, the vital challenge of the Christian Gospel and 
the New Testament to modern education is that they do 



to THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

actually provide an ideal of personality and character, 
capable of universal application, comprehensive enough 
to serve as the ultimate moral aim of all education. It is 
revealed, on the one hand, in the personality and character 
of Jesus Christ, and, on the other hand, in the Kingdom 
of God, combining in one coherent whole both the in- 
dividual and the social aspects of the moral ideal. 

THE CHRISTIAN IDEAL 

Here also we cannot, it is true, avoid the conflict of 
interpretation, but that conflict itself is in fact only an 
added tribute to the educational value of the Christian 
standard, for what its history essentially reveals is the 
possibility of an ever-renewed application of the person- 
ality of Jesus and the life of the Kingdom to the need 
and capacity of age after age. It is one of the great 
tasks of the Christian Church to think and live itself more 
and more fully into the variety of that interpretation and 
application, as it must become one of the tasks of the 
modern educator to use its material to fill with richer 
content the empty forms in which he is apt to present 
the ultimate end of education. If the formation of 
character and the growth of personality or a society of 
personalities are to take their place effectively as the final 
end of education, the problem of the kind of character 
and the type of personality which are worth perpetuating 
must more and more secure the concentrated attention 
of educational thinkers. It is certainly the bounden duty 
of the Christian teacher to secure the adoption of the 
personal spirit of Jesus and the Kingdom of God as the 
ultimate end of all education. To succeed in such a task 
he will have to meet at least two elementary conditions : 

(a) He must be prepared to analyse the spirit and life 
of Jesus and the Kingdom in such a way as to distinguish 
between those elements in all historical presentations of 
them which were merely temporary and those which can 
lay claim to some permanent validity. 

(b) He must be ready to recognize the existence and 
partial validity of a large number of subsidiary educational 
aims, which he must be able to co-ordinate and organize 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION n 

into a system with the ultimate end as its centre and final 
sanction. Somehow or other, in order to maintain its 
supreme sway, the ultimate ideal proposed must include 
in itself and justify all other legitimate and worthy aims. 
The Christian teacher has no right to propose the Christian 
ideal as a standard unless he is able to show how it coheres 
with and includes such well-established educational aims 
as earning a living, gaining knowledge, self-realization, 
harmonious development, moral character and social 
efficiency. 

There is therefore a great deal of work still to do 
before it can be said that either Christian or general 
educational thinking has exhausted the possibilities of 
discussion with regard to the ultimate end of education. 
Its problems must always be borne in mind by the teacher 
of the New Testament. 

The recent and increasing tendency among both 
philosophers and theologians following in the footsteps 
of the economists to express the meaning of life and the 
world in terms of ' value ' ought to be a great help to the 
fruitful discussion of such questions as these. The fresh 
category of ' value ' intrinsic and instrumental is being 
used more and more extensively in all ethical, philos- 
ophical and even metaphysical discussions, and may yet 
provide the common ground so much needed in order to 
approach the solution of such central problems as the 
ultimate end of education and its content. 

THE VALUE OF SYSTEMATIC INSTRUCTION 

3. We come to a somewhat different question when we 
deal with the exact value of systematic instruction in the 
general process of education, and especially of education 
in morality and religion. It is still the subject of some- 
what heated controversy. The old confusion between 
education and instruction is now largely a thing of the 
past. The organization of personal intercourse and ex- 
perience, and indeed of the whole environment of the pupil, 
has found its own special place alongside of systematic 
instruction. The disciples of Herbart are, of course, the 
most enthusiastic sponsors of definite and direct systematic 



12 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

instruction, and especially of ' educative ' instruction as 
central and essential to any efficient system of education. 
The insistence on the fact that instruction may have a 
definite formative moral value represents one of the great 
services of Herbart in the history of modern education. 
By this is meant that some ideas, when presented in the 
proper way and at the proper time, can and do become 
living forces in the formation of character. They acquire 
power to create spontaneously and almost automatically 
feelings of living interest, to grip the mind and to direct 
as well as to strengthen the will. Certain kinds of know- 
ledge given in the right way and at the right time can 
produce a moral and religious change. It is difficult to 
see how that can legitimately be denied. We may add, 
it is true, that though instruction may have a value of 
its own, if it is of the right kind, yet it is never fully and 
morally effective apart from the spontaneous self-activity 
of the pupil, the personality of the teacher and the 
organization of the environment. 

It is true also that before any satisfactory and satisfy- 
ing conclusion can be reached with regard to the value of 
instruction as a means of education, we stand in need of a 
much more thorough investigation of such problems as 
the following : What kind of ideas or principles or con- 
victions or knowledge has naturally or can acquire this 
formative power ? Why and how does instruction become 
' educative ' ? By what process does an idea become an 
ideal ? 

Herbart 's analysis of the process of Apperception and 
his doctrine of Interest reveal some important links in 
the chain which connects the idea with the will ; but, gener- 
ally speaking, it may be said that the specific value of 
instruction is taken for granted rather than realized in 
detail by the educational Psychologists. If the great 
motive which leads to moral activity is a sense of value 
in some ' good,' then ideas become educative in so far 
as they represent ' values ' intrinsic or instrumental 
and only by some systematic instruction can any adequate 
knowledge be brought of these values and ideals as well 
as of the various ways and means of reaching them. 
Definite instruction provides also the only means of en- 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 13 

larging the narrow range of personal experience and inter- 
course ; and since perception without conception is blind 
and wayward, it provides the only means also of using 
systematic thought for the necessary interpretation of 
experience. 

These and other similar observations seem to rule out 
of court the theories of all those who seem prepared to 
banish all definite and systematic instruction from the 
teaching of morality and religion, and the teacher of the 
New Testament can still remain confident that he is 
betraying no educational principles when he is using its 
material for the direct and indirect presentation of moral 
and spiritual values, as well as of the means of reaching 
them. 



THE PLACE OF RELIGION IN EDUCATION 

4. It is now almost universally recognized that 
religion in its deepest and broadest sense is an important, 
if not a central, constituent in all effective education. It 
is so because religion is a primary fact in human nature 
and history " an entirely natural product of the human 
soul in its intercourse with the material world and with 
other souls." This statement, however, requires to be 
qualified in several ways before it can yet be claimed as an 
effective confession of modern education. 

In many cases, though based upon undoubted psy- 
chological and historical facts, the recognition of religion 
amounts to little more than a formal acknowledgment 
without any very strenuous attempt to make practical 
application of the principle. Even where religious in- 
struction may take an important place in the curriculum, 
it remains more often than not a mere excrescence. 
Seldom indeed is any serious attempt made to bring 
religion into any vital co-ordination with the teaching 
as a whole, with the result that a position of ' splendid 
isolation ' becomes merely another name for a degrad- 
ing ineffectiveness. This failure is, of course, due quite 
as much to the persistent intellectual and practical dual- 
ism of religious teachers as to the lack of educational 
thoroughness. 



14 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

The educational attitude towards religion suffers also 
from a persistent vagueness in the use of the term, 
corresponding to the vagueness in the definition of the 
moral aim of education which has already been referred to. 
It is true that there is a religious spirit and attitude behind 
and beyond every particular form of religion, but that 
spirit does not exist in and for itself without definite 
expression in one of the many types of religious life and 
character. It cannot be cultivated in vacuo, but always 
in and through one or other of these types. The challenge 
of Christianity to modern education is that for its pur- 
poses there cannot be found a higher and more compre- 
hensive form of the religious life and spirit than that 
which is incorporated in the Christian Gospel and the 
New Testament. 

We need to be reminded also that this acknowledgment 
of religion by the modern educator does not settle, and is 
not intended to settle, the question of when and where 
' religious instruction ' should be given whether as 
definite lessons or through the ordinary subjects of litera- 
ture or history or science, whether by the State or by the 
Church or by both. It does imply, however, that whenever 
or wherever or by whomsoever it may be given, it must 
be in relation to and co-ordinate with that whole system 
of values which education in general is intended to pro- 
mote. It is also implied that it is always the business of 
the educator to recognize that religion is a primary and 
essential factor in the making of men and women, and 
that it is a part of his task to see that full and proper 
provision is made in the general education of the nation 
for the training of the religious side and for the satis- 
faction of the religious needs of human nature. It is 
his business also to suggest the best and most effective 
material for that purpose. And here the question with 
which we are really concerned is how far and in what sense 
the New Testament is capable of supplying that need. 






CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 15 

3 
EDUCATIONAL METHODS 

MODERN EDUCATIONAL METHODS 

This discussion of the educational heritage of which 
the Christian teacher is the natural heir would not be 
complete without some reference to the expert guidance 
which is at his disposal for the task of organizing his 
material and transmitting it in the most effective way. 
He is, of course, not called upon nor expected to apply 
slavishly to morality and religion the particular methods 
of modern teachers of other subjects. It is the general 
principles underlying all particular methods that he needs, 
first of all, to assimilate. On the other hand, he must 
not forget that in dealing with the Bible he is also dealing 
with what is essentially the material of Literature and 
History and that the experts in teaching these subjects 
have a great deal to teach him too with regard to the 
educational interpretation of his material and its proper 
grading for different ages, and also with regard to the 
form, arrangement and presentation of his material. 
But the expert advice must always be adapted to the 
peculiar character and characteristics of the Biblical 
Literature and History with which the Christian teacher 
is definitely dealing. 

Up till very recently the method that dominated all 
education and instruction was that of an almost mechanical 
memorizing. The teacher simply acted as the transmitter 
of the stuff his business being to put it into the form 
most suitable for its effective gripping of the verbal 
memory. This, at any rate, describes the method in its 
extreme form. 

By this time the pendulum has swung completely 
over to the other extreme in the Montessori method ; and 
though it may be blasphemy to suggest such a thing, a 
malicious opponent might be led to say that we have 
here a signal instance of how extremes meet. In both 
the oldest and the newest method the teacher does not 
teach, but simply stands by watching the child learn. 



16 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

In very different forms both extremes reveal an almost 
incredible credulity with regard to the unaided capacity 
of the human young to teach himself if he is left alone. 

Such a view, however, would represent only a very 
superficial and popular interpretation or misrepresentation 
of Dr. Montessori 's almost unique services to the Science 
and Art of Education. If the Montessori teacher can 
afford to ' stand and wait ' acting as a kind of living 
reference book, only to be used in emergencies that is 
because his work has already been done thoroughly in the 
selection and organization of the whole environment of 
the child. The mere possibility of such a misrepresenta- 
tion, however, may serve as a warning to the unwary 
when they are tempted superficially to imitate a genius. 

The valuable experiments of Dr. Montessori are un- 
doubtedly destined to exercise a very healthy influence 
upon the whole conception of education ; but so far as the 
teaching of morality and religion is concerned, they are 
only at their preliminary stage. They may before long 
challenge the right of definite and systematic instruction 
in morality and religion, as they have already shown the 
need for a radical reconsideration and reorganization of 
the environment now provided by religious institutions. 
We are not yet, however, in a position to discuss the 
relation of the Montessori method to the teaching of the 
older children and adolescents, with which we are here 
mainly concerned. 

In any case, we must not let this universal reaction 
against the mechanical memorizing of the past blind us 
to the fact that there is a place for the appeal to the 
memory. In its own place and under proper conditions 
that appeal is an essential element in any well-ordered 
system of instruction. All effective education, in fact, 
depends upon it. The claim of modern methods is that 
they do store the memory with what is needed for the 
guidance of life, and with far richer resources than any 
mechanical learning by rote can ever do. It is very 
probable also that the reaction even against mechanical 
memorizing has gone too far. 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 17 



THE IMPRESSIONIST SCHOOL OF METHOD 

Apart from this, the main educational methods at 
present in vogue fall into three main types. Rather 
:clusive claims have been sometimes made on behalf of 
ich of these, but as a matter of fact they are not incon- 
sistent with one another. They may be called respectively 
:he Impressionist, the Constructive and the Argumentative 
>chool of Method. The Impressionist method implies 
;hat the teacher is an artist whose delight is in depicting 
dvid and dramatic scenes with a lavish and loving brush. 
His business is to arouse active sentiments of wonder, 
tdmiration and love by fixing living pictures in the mind. 
He aims at reaching the will mainly through the imagina- 
tion and the emotions. Hence his cry is for story-telling, 
more story-telling and still more story-telling. He makes 
the bread of stories out of wood and stone, and one would 
not be surprised to find mathematical tables at any time 
become changed under the magic wand into a fairy tale 
or a heroic saga. The story-telling teacher takes pleasure 
in enlarging upon his theme and working out its incidents 
in elaborate detail rich in colour and glowing in tone. 
He works both for large effects and deep impressions. 
Sometimes it is claimed that this artistic method can 
cover almost the whole range of instruction ; but most 
naturally it finds in history, nature, morality and religion 
its own chosen field. 

It must readily be granted that the Impressionist 
teacher has built up his theory, which has been put here 
in its extremer form, upon the solid basis of psychology 
and experience. We all love a good story, and it is one 
of the most effective instruments known to us for gripping 
the interest and so directing the will. To acquire the art 
of story-telling, therefore, must always be one of the 
main tasks of the teacher. We shall see also that the 
material of the New Testament is of such a character as 
not only to be susceptible to this method of treatment, 
but even to demand story-telling for the effective trans- 
mission of a great deal of it. 

There is no doubt, also, that for the ages of wonder 
2 



i8 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

and imagination in infancy and early childhood there is 
no substitute at all for the well-told story. 

Its danger, however, is that it may very easily defeat 
its own purpose. The attention is apt to be attracted 
by so many vivid details, and the interest gripped by so 
many strong and concrete images, that it requires a very 
sure artistic touch to preserve the unity of the impression. 
Except v on the very highest levels of story-telling, some 
element other than the sheer artistic desire to tell a story 
well and fully seems necessary in order to make the story 
into an effective method of teaching. 

THE METHOD OF SYSTEMATIC PRESENTATION 

It is the endeavour to provide that element in a 
scientific way that justifies and marks what we have 
called the Constructive School of Method. It also may 
make an extensive use of story-telling, but the story as 
such does not really represent the genius of this method, 
which is mainly associated with Herbart and his disciples. 
Its essential feature is the attempt to influence the will 
by setting in motion the process of apperception in the 
mind, thus creating a new circle of thought with which 
and in which Interest is inextricably bound up. It is 
the Interest thus created that is supposed to control the 
will. Herbart himself analysed the way in which the mind 
thus goes to work into the four formal steps of clearness, 
association, system and method. This analysis has since 
been modified and amplified by his followers into the 
' five formal steps ' of Preparation (with a Statement of 
the Aim as a sub-step), Presentation, Comparison, General- 
ization and Application. According to the theory, it is 
the business of the teacher to see that the mind passes 
through these steps, and for the devout Herbartian it is 
pretty certain that the only way to secure this result is 
to ' build up ' the material of instruction itself on these 
lines. The teacher is therefore essentially a builder, first 
of all of his material and through that of the mind. All 
this was applied by Herbart himself only to large masses 
of material and groups of lessons, but it is now very 
generally applied to the construction of single lessons 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 19 

with more artificiality and less effect. It is an interesting 
experiment to group the whole material of the New Testa- 
ment in accordance with the Herbartian formulae. 

The merits of this method are very evident, and its 
influence upon moral and religious instruction has been a 
very healthy one. It keeps before us the ideal of moulding 
the material of instruction into one organic whole. It 
loes not allow the teacher to run away from his task for a 
dngle moment. It emphasizes the importance and char- 
icter of the material itself and implies a thorough mastery 
)f its content and form in detail. It binds the teacher 
:o a constant contact with the actual psychological process, 
rhich must be set in motion by his presentation of the 
material . In the main, the formal steps represent a natural 
and fairly accurate analysis of that process. 

On the other hand, the defects and dangers of the con- 
structive method must not be overlooked. The relation 
between the process of apperception and the decision of 
the will is not always what the method implies. The 
possession of a ' circle of thought ' is no guarantee of the 
moral activity that corresponds with it. The whole pro- 
cess from beginning to end is defined far too exclusively in 
intellectual terms and far too much as the mechanical 
working of a machine which only requires the touch of 
a knob to set it going. Neither is it quite certain that the 
best way to set it going is always to imitate the formal 
steps involved in the process itself. The working of the 
human mind cannot be quite so logical and perform such 
clean-cuts as the formal steps imply. The application of 
the same rigid procedure to the construction of each lesson 
in an endless series must often involve an artificial stick- 
ing-on of labels to material that does not naturally conform 
to type. 

This constructive method, therefore, with all its merits 
and attractions, cannot legitimately make any exclusive 
claims upon the teacher. It is an excellent servant, but 
may become a bad master. What is probable is that, 
modified and qualified by a more thorough and less 
mechanical psychology, it is the most helpful method 
yet found for the teaching of late childhood and early 
adolescence especially. 



20 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

THE METHOD OF QUESTIONING 

The third or the argumentative method represents a 
still more direct appeal to the intellect and a still greater 
dependence upon the intellect for the direction of the will. 
It represents the old and familiar question-and-answer 
method which has been stereotyped in the Church Cate- 
chism. It is a variation of the method of teaching 
associated with the name of Socrates. In spite or perhaps 
because of its familiarity, this method of instruction has 
not received from modern educators the scientific attention 
it ought. Essentially it is an attempt logically to deduce 
principles from facts, or to apply principles to new facts 
by a series of well-framed questions, inviting the pupils 
themselves to carry through the whole process by their 
answers. 

Here the teacher is an explorer and guide rather than 
a builder or an artist. He attempts to make the pupil 
feel that it is he himself who is doing the work. The 
teacher is only giving him an opportunity, as it were, to 
discover the truth for himself. We have here once again 
one of the main elements of instruction, the efficiency of 
which depends upon the development of the art of skilful 
questioning. The whole method taken by itself implies, 
of course, a great deal of faith in the logical power of the 
youthful mind, and it is very difficult to conceive any very 
extensive use of it by itself as an independent method of 
instruction. It is probable, however, that teachers have 
been too prone to underestimate the intellectual and 
logical capacities of late childhood and early adolescence, 
and the revival of a method of this kind in a more scientific 
form may yet lead to very fruitful results. The tradi- 
tional disconnected and haphazard questioning is, of course, 
only an abuse. It is true that the preparation for giving 
instruction by this method cannot be so rigid and elaborate 
in detail as in the case of story-telling. The material must 
be under control in a somewhat elastic form, for the 
answers to questions cannot always be anticipated. That, 
however, only means that the preparation must be all the 
more thorough, while the demand upon the alertness of the 
teacher at the moment is far greater. 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 21 

Here, again, the truth seems to be that a method of this 
kind is specially adapted for the teaching of middle and 
late adolescence, and only in a subordinate place for the 
instruction of childhood. 

These seem to be the chief types of methods at the 
disposal of the teacher of the New Testament. He will 
do well not to pin his faith to any one of them, and refuse 
to bow to any exclusive claims made on their behalf. 
They will help to convince him that he must learn the art 
of effective story-telling, the art of clear, systematic and 
unified presentation of his material, and the art of skilful 
questioning. 

NEED OF VARIETY IN METHOD 

Starting from the value of these, he will probably find 
that his main stand-by for infancy and early childhood 
will be story-telling in all its forms ; presentation on more 
or less Herbartian lines for late childhood and early 
adolescence ; and questioning for the later periods. His 
experience will also probably show him that his choice 
of any one of these methods or any combination of them 
will come to depend upon the character of the material 
with which he happens to be dealing. Individual incidents, 
personal history, biographical records and imaginative 
material will naturally take the form' of stories. Studies 
in character and personality, the record of social groups, 
the transmission of moral experience and the intellectual 
content of life will require the aid of the Herbartian or 
some similar systematic positive presentation ; while the 
discovery and formulation of general principles and their 
application will require the more argumentative method. 
This, however, is only a very rough division of his material, 
and the teacher must be ready to adopt very varied com- 
binations of methods at all stages, according to the call of 
his subject-matter and the particular capacities of his 
pupils. 

In the end, what is to be hoped for is that the teacher 
will discover for himself just that particular variety of any 
one or all of these methods as his very own and learn to 
depend upon it as his mainstay. 



22 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Such, then, as regards general principles and methods, 
is the educational situation into which must be inserted 
the task of teaching the New Testament in the modern 
world. It is a privilege to enter into the rich heritage it 
represents and to make faithful answer to its urgent 
demands. It is very humiliating to realize how in- 
effective so far has been the response of the Christian 
Church as a whole. As an educational institution, no 
one will venture to claim that it is at present doing its 
work in any satisfactory way. Whether its educational 
purpose be considered as giving a knowledge of the Bible, 
or obtaining converts, or transmitting a knowledge of what 
Christianity means, or producing strong Christian men 
and women ; whether we consider the education it pro- 
vides, the instruction it imparts or the methods it adopts ; 
whether we consider its buildings, its equipment or its 
staffing unfortunately there is no one who will or can 
claim anything like efficiency for its work. The whole 
organized education of the Church lacks life newness of 
life, driving power, the power of the Spirit that maketh 
all things new. And it can find what it lacks only in one 
way in a baptism, and that a baptism by total im- 
mersion into the overflowing spirit of its own Gospel 
first, and then into the purest ideals and principles of 
modern education. We must somehow win the faith that 
by the grace of God we have been entrusted with a large 
measure of real power deliberately to mould human souls, 
and that God is leading us more and more to discover how 
to do it effectively. 

Such is essentially the religious faith of modern 
education. We must see that it is also the educational 
faith of the Christian Church. 



BOOKS 

ADAMS (J.i). Modern Developments in Educational Practice. (London, 

1922.) 
BAGLEY (W. C.^.The Educative Process. (London and New York, 



BRYANT (SOPHIE) Moral and Religious Education. (London, 1920.) 
CAMPAGNAC (E. T.). Elements of Religion and Religious Teaching 
(Cambridge,? 19 1 8.) 



CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND MODERN EDUCATION 23 

COE (G. A.). Education in Religion and Morals. (New York, 1904.) 
A Social Theory of Religious Education. (New York, 1919.) 

DAVIDSON (J.). Means and Methods in the Religious Education of the 
Young. (London, 1917.) 

DEWEY (J.). Moral Principles in Education. (Boston, 1910). How 
We Think. (Boston, 1910.) 

GOULD (F. J.). Moral Instruction, its Theory and Practice. (London, 



HALL (STANLEY). Educational Problems. (New York, 1911.) 
HAYWARD (F. H.). The Meaning of Education. (London, 1907.) 
KIRK (K. E.). A Study of Silent Minds. (London, 1918.) 
M'CuNN (J.). The Making of Character. (Cambridge, 1912.) 
PAUL (AGNES S.). Some Christian Ideals in the Teaching Profession. 

(London, 1919.) 

POTTER (H. C.). Principles of Religious Education. (London, 1901.) 
RAYMONT (T.). The Principles of Education. (London, 1910.) 
RICHERT (H.). Handbuch fur den evangelischen Religionsunterricht. 

(Leipzig, 1911.) 

RUSK (R. R.). The Religious Education of the Child. (London, 1915.) 
SADLER (M. E.). Moral Instruction and Training in Schools. (London, 

1908.) 

SAXBY (I. B.). Education of Behaviour. (London, 1921.) 
SISSON. The Essentials of Character. (New York, 1915.) 
SPILLER (G.). Papers on Moral Education. (London, 1908.) 
T. C. U. Education : Its Spiritual Basis and Social Ideals. (London, 

1918.) 

THORNDIKE (E. L.). Educational Psychology. (New York, 1913.) 
WELTON (J.). What do we mean by Education ? (London, 1914.) 



CHAPTER II 

THE NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 

r. The Study of the New Testament. Modern Biblical Criticism The 
External Characteristics of the New Testament Its Contents 
Different Levels of Thought The Peculiar Contribution of the 
New Testament Summary. 

2. The Need of Trained Teachers. The Training of Teachers Their 

Need of a Critical Study of the Bible. 

3. The Teacher's Attitude. Two Questions Involved The Moral 

Demand Need of a Consistent Attitude Mediaeval v. Modern 
Methods The Attitude of the Great Preachers The Needs of 
the Ordinary Teacher The Parting of the Ways. 



THE STUDY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

A BAPTISM into the best spirit and principles of the great 
modern educators is capable of pouring new life into the 
moribund body of the moral and religious education of 
the Church, and, as we have seen, it is in an indirect way 
a baptism into the spirit and principles of the Christian 
Gospel. Naturally, however, we shall find a far more 
direct way into the heart of the same Gospel in every 
fresh literary, historical and religious study of the New 
Testament. 

MODERN BIBLICAL CRITICISM 

This is not the place to enter upon the history of the 
interpretation of the New Testament during the second 
half of the last century from the days of Strauss and 
Baur through Westcott, Hort and Lightfoot, down to the 
days of Sanday, Harnack, Julicher, Bousset and Johannes 
Weiss. As a whole, it is probably the history of one of 
the most thorough intellectual processes in the story of 



NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 25 

the race. Every book, every chapter, every phrase and 
every word in the New Testament have been under the 
critical microscope many times from almost every point 
of view. The work has been done with almost absolute 
freedom, running sometimes into licence and sometimes 
into the most utter disregard for the practical results, 
good or bad, which might follow for Christianity and 
the Church. All the more significant, therefore, is the 
undoubted fact that what is practically a consensus of 
scholarly opinion has now been reached with regard to 
the origin, nature and history of the books of the New 
Testament. So far, at any rate, as the teacher or the 
preacher is concerned, the differences between scholars 
are not of much account. The conception of the New 
Testament is now clear in all its main outlines and in 
most of its details. Tc this, the Christian teacher must 
adjust himself and his work, sooner or later, and the 
sooner the better. 

We cannot hide from ourselves the fact that it is a 
New Testament very different from that which was in 
the hands of the teacher a century ago. Of the tradi- 
tional theory or dogma about the Bible not a fragment 
has been left standing. An entirely new building stands 
on the site and in the place of the old, though it is true 
that many stones from the old house have been used in 
the reconstruction. It is especially necessary for the 
teacher at this point to be quite clear as to what that really 
means. 

In its logical and extreme form, the traditional idea 
of the Bible was that of a miraculous, absolute, objective 
and consistent Revelation throughout, given directly by 
God in a supernatural way, written at His dictation and 
preserved by supernatural means. 

In and for itself it was God's final word for all time. 
In form, origin and history it was taken to be so. 
From beginning to end it was a complete and consistent 
system of divine truth. This was the dogma of the Bible 
in its logical form. Every word was equally infallible 
and equally authoritative. Every word meant something 
important in a religious and Christian sense. 

Of course, no one did no one ever could carry out 



26 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

such a theory consistently into practice. We must not, 
however, forget that so long as it was consciously or sub- 
consciously accepted by the teacher and his pupils, it did 
supply in a marvellous way their greatest needs for 
authority and for a final court of appeal. It was, however, 
a theory that might be shattered in a moment by any one 
who dared to employ his critical judgment upon it. That 
was what naturally did happen in course of time. The 
New Testament as well as the Old was, after a long struggle, 
claimed as a proper subject for the same kind of study as 
was given to other literature and by the same methods. 
The consequences of this critical study we must be pre- 
pared to accept frankly for the sake of teaching the New 
Testament effectively. It is, however, not the individual 
results in detail that concern us here so much as the final 
effect upon our general view of the New Testament as 
a whole in its origin, character and form. What, then, is 
the New Testament as we have it in our hands to-day ? 

THE EXTERNAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

i . With regard to its external characteristics : 

(a) The New Testament is a collection of early 
Christian writings, miscellaneous in form, including 
collections of biographical anecdotes of the Christian 
leaders, private letters, semi-formal epistles and several 
other types of literature common in their time. They 
were written by Christians to one another and some 
perhaps to outsiders on matters relating to the new 
religion . 

(b) The New Testament, however, is not merely a 
haphazard collection, but a selection from a larger mass of 
Christian writings, belonging approximately to the first 
century after the death of Jesus Christ. This selection 
was not deliberately made on one principle. The New 
Testament writings are not all earlier than other Christian 
writings. They are not different in their form. They 
are not all apostolic in their origin. Their selection was 
not one deliberate act, but the result of a long process 
carried on by different Churches in different places and 



NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 27 

from different motives. The New Testament came into 
being by a process of natural selection and survival, and it 
was only the last step, and that a formal one, which was 
taken by the Church Councils. 

(c) So far as all external characteristics are concerned, 
no difference can be traced between the writings of the New 
Testament and those of their time and age outside. In 
language, origin, literary forms, history and preservation 
they underwent the same fortunes and misfortunes as 
the other books which have come down to us until they 
were definitely elevated into the Sacred Canon of the 
Church. 

Externally, therefore, we have before us a natural, 
human, historical and literary growth. The books are 
human products which scholars have succeeded in putting 
back into their setting in the literature, history, thought 
and language of the first two centuries. 

Whether and how far what the early Christians had 
to say to one another in and through these writings is a 
Word or the Word of God to us is a matter upon which 
literary and historical study as such can pass no direct 
judgment. It is not within its province to do so. To 
call the New Testament inspired or revealed can only 
be a judgment upon the value of its content, and it is 
independent of its form and the process through which 
it came. Whatever special moral or religious value there 
may be in the New Testament writings, it is clear that 
that value is not derived from and cannot depend upon 
either their literary origin or their history, upon their 
external characteristics or the method of their preserva- 
tion and collection but only upon the character of their 
contents, the life from which they sprang and the effects 
they produce. 

2. We are therefore driven back more definitely than 
ever before upon the character of the contents of the 
New Testament. 

(a) Although no hard and fast distinction can any 
longer be drawn externally between early Christian writings 
inside and outside the Canon, yet the choice of the books 
which we have now in the New Testament has been fully 
justified on the merits of their contents. 



28 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

They are the documents which are most typical of 
the early Christian movement itself, and which are of most 
importance in estimating the character and value of that 
movement. It is true that Luther called the Epistle of 
James " an epistle of straw, for there is nothing evangelical 
in it," but that was a very hasty judgment on his part. 
It might also be argued that the Epistle of Barnabas, 
the first Epistle of Clement and the Letters of Ignatius 
ought to have been included, but it would tax the ingenuity 
of the critic to decide whether they are superior or equal 
in value to any New Testament writings. It must also 
be confessed that the boundary between the canonical 
and the extra-canonical books nearest to them was for 
long very uncertain. 

THE CONTENTS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

In spite of all this, however, the right of the New 
Testament to represent the meaning of Early Christianity 
still stands firm. While the reasons given originally in 
each case for placing individual books inside or outside 
the Canon cannot always be endorsed, yet the verdict 
of the Early Church as to the supreme value of the New 
Testament as a whole, compared with all the other writings 
of the time, has been amply confirmed. We can therefore 
be sure that when we are dealing with these writings 
we are at the heart of the Christian movement. 

(b) It has also been clearly revealed to us by this time 
that in purpose and nature every part of the contents of 
the New Testament is essentially occasional and practical. 
Even the fixing of the Canon was not really the work of 
the great Councils. It was the free choice of the Christian 
Churches to meet their practical needs for Christian 
edification and instruction. Every book was written 
with a definite practical purpose even the Epistle to 
the Romans and the Apocalypse. Each was intended to 
meet some concrete situation, and always sprang out 
of some concrete historical circumstances. Each writer 
wished to bring the power of the Christian Gospel to bear 
upon some definite moral conditions. There is not a 
book in the New Testament which can be fully or properly 



NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 29 

described either as a theoretical treatise, or an historical 
essay, or a mere literary effort. 



DIFFERENT LEVELS OF THOUGHT AND LIFE 

(c) Scientific modern study has also made it both 
necessary and possible to distinguish great differences in 
the character and the value of the contents of the different 
books of the New Testament. There are two significant 
illustrations of this fact. In the first place, there are 
present throughout the New Testament two elements 
which can be separated from each other. There are 
features which belong to the age in general, something 
which the New Testament has in common with the non- 
Christian Jewish, Greek or Oriental thought and life 
of the time. Then alongside of that element we have 
the message which is peculiar to these books themselves, 
or rather to the movement they represent, namely, that 
which is the peculiar contribution of the Founder, and of 
the teachers and preachers of the new religion. The 
proportion and the way in which these two elements are 
mixed in the different books vary considerably, but in 
none is either element entirely absent. Sometimes the 
peculiar Christian element is the predominant factor and 
the form only, or the expression only belongs to the age 
in general ; but sometimes the Jewish or Greek thought 
is only given a kind of Christian twist. 

The relation between these two elements may be ex- 
pressed in different ways. They have been called the 
kernel and the husk, the permanent and the passing, 
the spirit and the form, the Gospel and its historical 
expressions. A great deal of the teaching of the New 
Testament must always be concerned with distinguishing 
between these two. 

In the second place, we have learnt to recognize many 
different levels of thought and life in the New Testament. 
Of these, three at least can be described with some fulness 
and represent fundamental types of early Christian thought 
and life, namely, the Synoptic, the Pauline and the 
Johannine. It will naturally be one of the main tasks of 
the Christian teacher to distinguish, compare and estimate 



30 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

the value of these different forms of Christian life and 
thought. 

THE PECULIAR CONTRIBUTION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

(d) By all these means what is the most original 
contribution made by the Christian movement to the life 
and thought of the world has been brought clearly into 
prominence. This peculiarly Christian contribution as 
revealed in the New Testament is found neither in the 
books themselves as books nor even in doctrines and ideas^ 
but in the personalities whom they reveal in the personal 
life and the practical attitude towards life and the world 
which they express, the deep moral and religious experience 
which created the books and the ideas. More especially, 
it has been shown that the comparative value of the books 
and their ideas depends upon the relation in which they 
stand to the one Personality which dominates them all 
to a greater or less extent that of Jesus of Nazareth. 

(e) Finally, it is important for the teacher to note that 
in establishing all these facts about the New Testament, 
modern study has also succeeded in revealing to us a great 
deal of the whole concrete world from and into which the 
Christian Religion and the New Testament itself came, 
the world in which the Christian Gospel had to dwell, with 
which it became united in detail and whose problems it 
set out to solve. They are the Jewish, the Oriental, the 
Greek and the Roman world of the time in language, 
thought, morality, religion, politics and social conditions. 
Into this world, the Gospel, the Christian ideal and power 
were thrown ' like ferment into the pot/ The result is 
that what we have in the New Testament is the Gospel, 
not in the abstract or as a set of theoretical principles, 
but in a multitude of concrete forms and concrete relations. 
So far as the New Testament is concerned, the Gospel has 
no reality except as it takes shape in definite historical 
circumstances, men and societies. 

SUMMARY 

To put it briefly, then, the New Testament is a collection 
of and a selection from early Christian writings, differing 






NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 31 

in nothing so far as all external characteristics are con- 
cerned from the other writings of the same age. Repre- 
senting as they do a natural human growth, they are 
nevertheless the most characteristic literary products of 
the early Christian movement. Among themselves, the 
books differ in their literary form, purpose and value, but 
in them all we can distinguish the peculiar contribution of 
the new religion to the world its Gospel, which is found 
pre-eminently in the personality of Jesus of Nazareth. 
The New Testament, however, gives us this Gospel in the 
mould of a definite age in many different forms to meet 
the various conditions of the time. For that reason, the 
study of the New Testament is being gradually transformed 
into a study of Primitive Christian Life, History and 
Personality, producing and expressing itself in thought, 
literature and action. 

It is these general facts, with regard to the nature of 
the New Testament as a whole, that are by far the most 
important for the modern Christian teacher. The further 
results of critical study in detail, with regard to questions 
of date, authorship and the historical accuracy of the 
several books, are not so important, and any attempt to 
describe these results would take us at present too far 
afield. The essential point with regard to them all is that 
the decision of each question must be obtained in the same 
way as all other similar questions are decided, and that is 
simply on the evidence available. 

It is seldom, however, that they are of any importance 
to the teacher as such. His great gain with regard to them 
is that he is placed in a much freer position on these 
matters. He reaches a point of view which makes him 
more or less independent of them, for he cannot any 
longer trade in the form of the books so much as in their 
content not so much in the written word itself as in what 
is behind it the experience, the life and the personalities 
revealed in and through the written word. It is only in 
so far as the critical discussions touch the life and per- 
sonalities in the New Testament that they affect the 
teacher's work to any extent. 

Such is the case, for instance, in the controversy with 
regard to the nature and historical character of the Fourth 



32 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Gospel. The different views on this question must lead 
to considerable differences in the treatment and use of the 
Fourth Gospel, and may change the whole historical picture 
of Jesus Christ. This, therefore, will need special discus- 
sion later on, along with some other questions of detail 
which affect the teaching of particular aspects of the New 
Testament. 



THE NEED OF TRAINED TEACHERS 

It goes without saying that this general picture of the 
history and contents of the New Testament must condition 
the practical use made of its literature and history in all 
directions. 

Any intrinsic authority which the New Testament may 
have on account of its contents is not thereby materially 
affected. Nor is our duty to make a knowledge of the New 
Testament an essential element in the general education of 
all who share in the civilization of Europe any the less 
imperative. For nothing can alter the fact that the New 
Testament has been one of the most potent factors in the 
growth of Europe. 

THE TRAINING OF TEACHERS 

There are, however, some considerations arising from 
the circumstances of our time, the controversies which 
have till recently been raging with regard to questions of 
Biblical Criticism, the hold which more or less traditional 
views still have upon the older generation and the frag- 
mentary way in which critical results have been spread 
by newspapers all these considerations seem to demand 
a somewhat fuller discussion of the value and the practical 
effect of the modern study of the Bible upon moral and 
religious instruction. It ought not to be necessary to 
remind those who are responsible for the training of 
teachers that the first condition of any effective teaching 
of the Bible (in the schools of the State no less than in the 
schools of the Church) is some sound scientific knowledge 



NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 33 

of the Bible itself in its history, form and contents. Yet 
the amazing fact is that at least half the children of the 
United Kingdom (and probably a much greater pro- 
portion) are constantly receiving moral and Biblical in- 
struction from teachers who have had no scientific or 
iy other definite training for their task. So far as the 
Elementary Schools are concerned, it is only in the de- 
lominational Training Colleges that any pretence is being 
tade to prepare the teachers for the work of teaching the 
Jible, to which at least half an hour daily will be devoted 
iroughout their career. Even their training is more often 
in not a very meagre and unscientific one. Most other 
"raining Colleges seem quite content to live by the hope 
that the teachers they turn out will somehow ' muddle 
through ' this part of their work in some miraculous way 
which they do not dream of trusting in the case of any 
other subject in the overcrowded time-table of Elemen- 
tary Schools. The situation in the Secondary Schools is 
still more scandalous. On the other side, the Education 
Authorities with one accord take it for granted that their 
task is nobly done when they have issued confused injunc- 
tions that morality and the Bible must be taught in their 
schools, and have published a still more confused and 
unintelligent syllabus, according to which they are to be 
taught. They never dream of asking whether some 
knowledge of Ethics and the Bible are included by any 
happy chance in the long list of the qualifications of the 
teachers they appoint. 

The so-called ' secular ' authorities may, of course, 
legitimately retort that they are only following the 
example of the Church. This is unfortunately but too 
true, for Sunday - school teachers are even worse off in 
this respect than the teachers in State Schools. So far 
as Nonconformity at least is concerned, the one excep- 
tion is the West Hill Training School, and that is more or 
less of a private venture, due to the enthusiasm of Mr. 
G. H. Archibald. Of course the result of all this insist- 
ence upon teaching morality and the Bible, coupled with 
the absolute neglect of providing any definite training for 
it, is that the teaching in the majority of cases is worse 
than useless, and that the most unintelligent views of the 
3 



34 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Bible are still spread broadcast, and the most irreverent 
attitude towards the Bible is assiduously cultivated. 



THE CRITICAL STUDY OF THE BIBLE 

So far we have been pleading only for some systematic 
knowledge of the Bible as the first condition of teaching it. 
We must realize, however, that in our day this systematic 
knowledge cannot be given or obtained except under the 
guidance of modern Biblical scholars who have made the 
Bible into a new book for the teacher as for all men. One 
of the most curious things in the history of most of the 
movements for the reform of the Sunday School is the 
hesitation and extreme diffidence with which this whole 
subject of the need for Biblical Criticism in the work of 
Biblical instruction is approached. An intense eagerness 
is often displayed for the adoption of up-to-date educa- 
tional methods, but there is generally a good deal of cir- 
cumlocution employed whenever it becomes a question 
of what, after all, we are supposed to teach through these 
modern methods. Many people seem to be under the 
impression that every child is born with certain traditional 
views of the Bible stereotyped upon his soul, and that 
therefore it is a very difficult and dangerous business 
to teach him what the Bible really means. As a matter 
of fact, of course, the truth is that in the majority of cases 
the parents and teachers have a perfectly free hand in this 
matter. If the child of twelve has acquired wrong views 
of the Bible, which must be corrected later on, it is gener- 
ally because the home or the school has taken a good 
deal of trouble to drill those wrong views into him. With 
far less trouble he might have been helped from the start 
to grow unconsciously into the proper attitude towards 
the Scriptures. It is not a question of changing the views 
of the child but of changing the views of the teacher, and 
of so teaching the Bible from the start that the child 
may be saved from the wrench of having to remake his 
faith later on. We are now continually emphasizing the 
need of proper methods for doing this work, but we must 
not forget that the matter of our teaching is at least quite 






NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 35 

as important a factor. How we teach will in the end 
depend upon what we want to teach. 

That is why it is especially necessary at the present 
time to realize that modern educational methods will not 
and cannot become the permanent methods of moral and 
religious education unless and until they are used to 
teach the material best adapted to those methods. That 
material in this case is the Bible as it comes from the 
ands of the modern scientific scholars. It follows as an 
nevitable consequence for the teacher that he must learn 
o adopt the free attitude of the literary and historical 
tudent towards the material as well as the form of the 
ible. He has done for ever with traditional theories 
th of the text, form and matter of the Biblical narra- 
tives. He will deal with them in exactly the same spirit 
and fashion as he must deal for educational purposes 
with all the world's best literature and that is with 
intelligence, freedom and reverence. 



3 
THE TEACHER'S ATTITUDE 

If the case for the frank adoption of the modern 
literary and historical methods of studying the Bible 
seems to need strengthening, there is no lack of material 
for that purpose. Both on moral and educational grounds 
the demand is urgent and overwhelming. 

Two QUESTIONS INVOLVED 

Some of the hesitation with regard to this question 
may be due to a lack of clearness as to the issues involved. 

In reality, two very different and independent prob- 
lems have to be discussed. The first is how far should 
our teaching of the Bible be based upon and be guided by 
the methods and results of modern criticism ? In other 
words, what is its value for the practical teaching of the 
Bible ? This deals with that part of the teacher's work 
which is, as it were, out of sight. It concerns the choice 



36 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

and preparation of the lessons, the value of the Bible as 
interpreted by modern scholars and the positive picture 
to be given of its place. This touches the pupil only 
indirectly. He may be quite unconscious of what the 
teacher is doing for him. 

The second question is one of a different kind. How 
far should the methods and results of modern criticism 
be deliberately and definitely taught in the school to the 
pupil ? When and how should that be done ? In other 
words, what is the educational value of a training in 
Biblical Criticism itself? Can it help, in any way, to 
promote the growth of Christian faith and character ? 

These two questions must be kept more or less apart 
and each discussed on its own merits. The latter we shall 
have to deal with later on among the particular problems 
of teaching the New Testament, and it is only the former 
which concerns us at present. 



THE MORAL DEMAND 

In the first place, the use we make of the Bible should 
as an elementary moral duty be guided and controlled 
by what we know the Bible to be. If we know, as we do, 
that the Book of Deuteronomy was not written by Moses, 
but belongs to the seventh century before Christ, there 
can be no justification for refusing to base our lessons on 
what we know to be the truth. The situation here is now 
perfectly clear. In the theological lecture-room every- 
where, the main results of modern Biblical Criticism as 
represented, say, by the late Professor Driver and Sir 
George Adam Smith in the Old Testament, and by the late 
Professor Sanday or by Harnack in the New Testament, 
are now universally adopted and more or less thoroughly 
applied. No responsible Biblical scholar would now 
dream of attributing the Book of Genesis to Moses or 
Isaiah xl. to Ixvi. to the prophet of that name in the 
eighth century B.C., or the Gospel of Matthew to the 
Apostle, or 2 Peter to the Apostle Peter. He would not 
dream of trusting to the historical accuracy of Chronicles. 
He would not hesitate to cut up the Books of Samuel into 
earlier and later documents that sometimes contradict 



NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 37 

each other, and he would immediately recognize in almost 
all the prophetic books the presence of passages from later 
writers. He takes it for granted that Matthew and Luke 
are dependent upon the Gospel of Mark and a Collection 
of the Sayings of Jesus, and he would not think of re- 
cognizing the Fourth Gospel without many qualifications 
as an historical record of the life of Jesus. 

If we still go on teaching on the basis of the traditional 
views of the Bible, we are perpetuating what we know to 
be false views and destroying the truth of history. 

NEED OF A CONSISTENT ATTITUDE 

The situation is aggravated by the fact that for years 
the critical views have been filtering down through the 
newspapers in a fragmentary and negative way to the 
man in the street and the ordinary teacher, with the 
result that in the majority of cases those who are teaching 
the Bible in thousands of schools up and down the country 
have definitely ceased to believe in the traditional views 
and to adopt the traditional attitude towards the Bible, 
but have not yet attained any personal, positive and 
systematic conceptions in their place. 

In many cases, therefore, an intolerable burden is 
imposed upon the truthfulness and sincerity of teachers 
whose instructions still imply the propagation of an 
attitude and of views which they no longer share. 

We must not, of course, hide from ourselves the fact 
that when a modern view of the Bible is adopted as the 
only possible background for all our teaching, we are 
leaving behind us much more than particular views on 
particular points. It must be repeated that we are re- 
pudiating the whole idea of the Bible as an infallible 
supernatural, miraculous revelation of scientific, historical 
and religious truth, as well as the old conception of religious 
education and Biblical instruction as a whole. On the 
old view, our main business was to transmit as much of 
the material of the Bible as time allowed, taking it for 
granted that it was all of equal value. No other method 
was possible. Every lesson must consist of comment 
upon a particular passage. There was no room in the 



38 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

scheme for lessons on either the History of Israel or the 
Religion of Israel as such, or upon the Books of the Bible 
as a whole. We could not give lessons on the character 
of Paul or the early History of Christianity except in a 
very fragmentary and haphazard way. According to the 
modern conception of the Bible and of Education, on the 
other hand, our business is to choose as much material 
from the Bible as has educative value and power, and to 
use it in such a way, at such a time and in such a form 
as will help to promote moral and religious growth. 

MODERN AND MEDIEVAL METHODS 

Between these two views there can be no real and 
permanent compromise, for what we have here is a quarrel 
between two fundamentally different conceptions of the 
meaning and place of the Bible as well as radically different 
conceptions of the meaning and methods of education. 
In religious instruction, it is true, many have for years 
been trying to combine modern educational ideas and 
methods with the traditional views of the Bible. The 
attempt is utterly hopeless, not only because the old 
views are false and discredited, but also because they are 
essentially inconsistent with every principle in modern 
education. The traditional views of the Bible imply 
and demand the mediaeval methods in order to teach 
them. On the other hand, the principles and methods 
of modern education can only be used to teach the 
corresponding results of modern study. It was the old 
idea of the Bible that created the mediaeval system of 
education, and they stand or fall together. 

It must, therefore, be realized that what the public 
teacher and preacher are face to face with, is not a frag- 
mentary and occasional acceptance under pressure of 
individual critical results a mere grafting of some 
critical views upon an attitude which is not organically 
united with them. It may be inevitable for the man in 
the street to pick up the results of modern study in 
snatches, and adopt them one by one without revising 
his whole attitude towards the Bible, and without realizing 
how they work out as a whole. Such a haphazard pro- 



NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 39 

ceeding can only be disastrous in its results for the 
Christian teacher. It is only a changed general attitude 
that can save the reality of Christian teaching. 

Public teaching which implies the outlook of Sir 
George Adam Smith to-day, and that of Dean Burgon 
to-morrow, must have fatal results for both teacher and 
people. It is, moreover, not fair to judge the practical 
results of either the one or the other by the effect of what 
is only an undigested mixture of both. Yet such is the 
ambiguous situation in the Church, pulpit, Sunday and 
Day Schools of to-day. It is one of the practical tasks 
of modern religious education to see that the children 
of this generation grow naturally and from the outset 
into that consistent, reverent and enlightened attitude 
towards the Bible which corresponds to the facts with 
regard to its character and history as revealed by modern 
study. It is a task which can never be adequately 
accomplished without some clear realization of the essential 
change of attitude involved on the part of the teacher. 
For the purposes of modern systematic education and 
instruction, the Bible becomes more and more ineffective 
unless and until the teacher reads and studies it under 
the guidance of modern scholars. This, of course, does 
not deny the tremendously revolutionary influence of a 
free personal reading of the New Testament upon character. 
It only confirms it, for that personal reading, so far as 
it has been fruitful for Christian purposes, has always 
implied in practice the overthrow of the rigid traditional 
attitude and the adoption of the critical attitude in 
essence by always claiming the right consciously or un- 
consciously to choose some parts of the Bible for edifica- 
tion in comparative disregard of the rest. It has found 
by personal experiment and an instinctive religious 
valuation what, for purposes of systematic instruction, 
must be found by scientific methods. In reality, the 
traditional dogma of the Bible is only a belated or borrowed 
theory which attempts to justify the religious value of 
parts of the Bible as discovered by experience, and is 
extended by the logic of uniformity to other parts and 
to the Bible as a whole. It explains that experience in 
the wrong way by borrowing its categories from Jewish 



40 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

and Pagan sources instead of building upon the Christian 
facts themselves. 



ATTITUDE OF THE GREAT PREACHERS AND TEACHERS 

It is worth noting also that this free critical attitude 
for which we are pleading has always supplied the central 
core of Christian teaching and preaching as that has been 
conceived by all the greatest Christian teachers and 
preachers in history. As Sir George Adam Smith has 
pointed out, 1 the modern critical movement leaves the 
very highest kind of preaching practically untouched. 
The great preachers have always instinctively used those 
parts of the Bible which modern criticism has now scientifi- 
cally shown to be the most fundamental and the peculiar 
Christian element in the Bible. They have in practice 
instinctively adopted that attitude towards their material 
which we now find to be best fitted to bring us face to face 
with its peculiar value in history and for life. The best 
preaching has always been personal and has always in- 
sisted upon its right to choose its own material from the 
Bible in spite of all theory. It has gone straight as an 
arrow to the human experience, character and person- 
alities of the Bible for its material and dealt with it in an 
essentially free, human way. That was the choice of its 
conscience, and the prevalent theory was only brought in 
alongside in order to enforce the choice. Nothing that the 
modern critic can say will compare in its daring directness 
with the judgment of Luther. " Christ is the master," he 
says, " and the Scriptures are the servant. Here is the 
touchstone for testing all books ; we must see whether 
they work the works of Christ or not. The book which 
does not teach Christ is not apostolic even were St. Peter 
or St. Paul its writer." He speaks of " scrutinizing the 
Scriptures " and sometimes finding " wood, hay, stubble 
and not always gold, silver and diamonds. Nevertheless, 
the essential abides and the fire consumes the rest." 2 It 
is, of course, Luther, the prince of teachers and preachers, 

1 See Modern Criticism and the Preaching of the Old Testament, pp. 74-5. 

2 Quoted in Sabatier, The Religions of Authority and the Religion of the 
Spirit, pp. 158-9. 



NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 41 

who here breaks through every dogmatic theory in order 
to find the real preaching and teaching material of the 
Bible. He thus expresses the essential practical attitude 
of all the very greatest preachers and teachers of Christian 
history, if not their theoretical belief. It is evident that 
no critical results can ever really touch any preaching or 
teaching that is based on such an attitude, although it 
may alter the forms of it in many ways. 

All this, however, is only added testimony to the fact 
that the rich spiritual content in the Bible will make its 
power felt through and sometimes in spite of any and every 
theory with regard to it. 



THE NEEDS OF THE ORDINARY TEACHER 

The preaching and teaching genius of the first order, 
however, only comes now and then into human history, 
and his influence must in any case be mediated by a host of 
smaller men in every generation who must wearily plod 
their patient way to those heights which the prophets 
reach at a bound. For them one may venture once more 
to assert that the modern study of the New Testament as 
human historical documents of the prophetic and for- 
mative period of our religion is a necessary preliminary 
if they are to make effective use of its material for the 
purposes of systematic instruction. It is only from this 
point of view that the Bible can find and retain its place 
permanently in general modern education. That applies 
to every stage in religious instruction from the primary 
department upwards. To prevent misconception, however, 
it must be clearly borne in mind that this does not imply 
that critical considerations should be brought directly to 
the notice of children. It does not mean that the teacher 
is to talk to them about J, E, D and P, or about Ur-Marcus 
and the Logia, or Q, from which Matthew and Luke drew 
their material. As we shall see later on, it is only very, 
very rarely that it is possible or desirable to discuss ques- 
tions of accuracy or authorship with children under 
twelve probably never except in answer to direct inquiry. 
The teacher's lesson and actual teaching must naturally be 
positive. The point is that his positive presentation must 



42 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

be based upon a critical consideration of his material before 
it can become an effective element in the education of 
present-day children. A brief review of the practice of any 
typically modern teacher like Mr. Archibald, or a brief 
consideration of some of the most familiar watchwords of 
modern educators, would make this at once evident. It 
would be seen that if modern educational methods are to 
find a home in Biblical instruction, the methods and main 
results of Biblical criticism must be adopted by the teacher 
as the basis of all his study and teaching quite apart from 
the fact that it is only by their means that a true view of 
the Bible can be taught to the child. 

THE PARTING OF THE WAYS 

It is really high time that this should be regarded as 
finally settled in Christian instruction. It is at the root 
of a great deal of the trouble which this time of transition 
has brought in religious instruction, while lack of clearness 
with regard to it accounts for a good deal of the futility 
of many earnest attempts at reform. We cannot indeed 
hope to make much progress in the effective teaching of the 
Christian Gospel and the New Testament to the modern 
world until the policy of the Christian teacher in this matter 
has been finally settled. Teaching an infallible oracle and 
an historical record of moral and religious experience are 
two very different and contradictory things, which require 
not only very different methods but also a very different 
type of material used for a very different purpose. 

It is mere childishness to imagine that the reverence 
of men for the Bible and its moral and religious value for 
their lives can be diminished by telling ' the truth in 
love ' about its origin, history and character, or that its 
dignity and spiritual power can ever be preserved and in- 
creased by insistence upon an antiquated and essentially 
pagan theory of its external authority as an infallible 
oracle on all kinds of subjects and a crudely supernatural 
prodigy. What the Bible is, it always has been and always 
will be, because men have heard the voice of God in and 
through it. The final test of our reverence for it and our 
belief in it will be in our utter trust in its inherent power 



NEW TESTAMENT AND THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER 43 

to reach the mind and heart and will the conscience of 
youth. The best that our instruction can do is to give it 
as good a chance as we can to do its work. As Dr. Stanley 
Hall says : " Youth most of all needs this greatest of 
human documents, and needs to read it with absolute 
freedom and honesty of mind ; and there is no danger 
but that the new light, already shining from it and yet to 
be revealed by their methods (those of the historical school 
of Bible study), will make the new to the old as astronomy 
to astrology, and will make young men not sceptics but 
apologists." 1 

BOOKS 

BACON (B. W.). The Making of the New Testament. (London, 1913.) 
Jesus and Paul. (London, 1921.) 

GARDNER (P.). A Historic View of the New Testament. (London, 1904.) 

M'LACHLAN (H.)- The New Testament in the Light of Modern Know- 
ledge. (London, 1914.) 

MOFFATT (J.). An Introduction to the Literature of the New Testament. 
(Edinburgh, 1920.) The Approach to the New Testament. (London, 
1921.) 

1 Adolescence, vol. ii. p. 324. 



CHAPTER III 

THE PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 

1. The New Testament and Modern Values. The Educational Value 

of the New Testament Education and the Preservation of 
Values The Records, Creative Epochs and their Educational 
Significance. 

2. Educational Features of the New Testament. The Conflict of Ideals 

The Literature of Personality A System of Values Social 
Significance. 

3. The New Testament and Adolescence. Grading the Material 

Features of Adolescence Adolescent Features in the New 
Testament Adolescent Interest in the New Testament The 
Natural Food of Youth. 



THE NEW TESTAMENT AND MODERN VALUES 

HAVING before us such a New Testament as has been 
described in the previous chapter, we cannot but ask 
what special claim a collection and selection of documents 
of this kind can have upon the modern educator. What 
kind of educational authority can be associated with 
such a New Testament ? What peculiar function can it 
perform in a system of education directed towards moral 
and religious ends ? Is there anything in the nature and 
form of its contents to the call of which any definite stage 
of moral and religious growth will spontaneously respond ? 
Is it capable of satisfying any fundamental educational 
need in a more effective way than any other material 
within our reach ? 

THE EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

Some intelligible answer must now be found to such 
questions as these, for henceforth the place of the Bible 

44 



PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 45 

in education must depend entirely upon the quality and 
power of its content and not upon any theory of its origin. 

The writings of the New Testament are in the first 
place historical documents. They are records of the 
past. Is there any special reason why they should not 
be relegated to the Museum with a great many other 
relics of days gone by ? What special justification is 
there for their continued life in the School ? 

It is possible and also quite legitimate to claim a 
special place for some kind of study of the New Testament 
by dilating upon the fact that the Bible is in any case an 
essential element in the civilization of Europe, and that 
therefore no one can be called properly educated who 
does not know the Bible. We might enlarge upon it as 
the great classic of English Literature. Such facts must 
certainly claim the attention of modern educators when 
they are discussing this subject, but they will not satisfy 
the claim usually made for the educational use of the 
New Testament. They provide, after all, only very sub- 
ordinate arguments for that educational use, and do not, 
in fact, bring us face to face with the real and peculiar 
contribution of the New Testament. It is specifically a 
religious book, and all its other qualities have originally 
sprung from its characteristic spiritual message and power. 
If it is to find its own special niche in the educational 
building, it must in the end be because of the special help 
it can give in the moral and religious training of men and 
women. It sprang out of religious life and was written 
for religious purposes. Every other quality it possesses 
is only by the way, and every other influence it may have 
exerted is ultimately due to its spiritual character. 

Now, we have already seen that modern educators are 
by this time practically agreed that religion, in spirit if not 
in form, is and must be a central constituent in the natural 
process of education. What, then, is the special contribu- 
tion of the New Testament to religion, and to religion 
as an educational force ? Naturally, it is the contribu- 
tion which Christianity makes to religion in general. 
The New Testament is throughout the outcome of the 
Christian movement, and any contribution it canVnake to 
education must be a specifically Christian contribution. 



46 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

It is not the whole of that Christian contribution. This 
would include the influence of the Christian Church, 
Christian personalities, Christian history and literature 
outside the New Testament, and especially all these 
Christian elements which are to-day still living and active 
all around us. But if the New Testament is not the whole 
of the Christian contribution to education, it may well 
represent the whole in essence, and it is undoubtedly the 
central element in the whole. It may not be the best 
means of bringing the influence of the Christian Church or 
Christian theology to bear upon the process of education, 
but it is at least still unique in the means which it places 
at our disposal to present the spiritual power behind the 
Christian Church and Christian theology effectively in its 
purest form. It is, on the face of it, our only record of the 
first creative period of the Christian Gospel when it came 
fresh and original into the world and was held passionately 
as the primary motive of life. 

That is, in brief, the first step towards a general 
educational valuation of the New Testament, but its 
complete justification as an educational instrument of 
peculiar significance calls for a much fuller discussion than 
this implies. 

EDUCATION AND THE PRESERVATION OF VALUES 

Education, after all, like Religion itself, deals with the 
living issues of the growing soul in the present and in the 
future, and no mere past or its record can claim any right 
of entry into its schools except the right of effective 
service in dealing with those issues. Fundamental, 
natural education, as we have seen, consists of spontaneous 
growth through personal living experiences. All other 
systematic education and instruction in School or Church 
or any other institution are only attempts to make up 
for the inevitable lack of range, variety and intensity 
of these personal experiences by means of the organiza- 
tion of environment, guidance and other influences 
necessary to provide opportunity for the fullest growth 
of the human young. These attempts all spring from the 
recognition of the fact that there do exist in the life of 



PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 47 

humanity certain ' goods ' which are worth preserving, 
and which must be reproduced and increased from genera- 
tion to generation for the sake of its continued life and 
growth. There is a growing tendency to find in this 
recognition of values and especially the supreme values 
of goodness, truth and beauty the deepest meaning and 
the strongest motive in man. The meaning of all educa- 
tion is to be found in the desire to secure, as the only 
guarantee of progress, that the young should appropriate 
these ' values ' even though they cannot, owing to the 
naturally narrow range of their experiences, come into 
direct personal contact with their most powerful bearers, 
>r cannot by their unaided immature judgment recognize 
te call of these ' values ' amidst the chaos of conflicting 
insations and presentations. 

These values may range from the power to read, write 
count, through the physical sciences, political and social 
istitutions, family, State, Church, to purely moral and 
>iritual values like brotherhood, faith, hope, love, for- 
giveness, freedom, humanity and God. What is significant 
lucationally about them is not only that they are the 
larantees of present reality and future growth, and the 
:rongest motives which lead to fuller life, but also that 
ley all have their history and have grown out of history. 
*o each belongs its creative epoch and period when it 
first revealed, created and produced in and by some 
jrsonality or group-movement of men. For lack of 
lirect personal contact with these creative souls or move- 
tents, it is the historical record of them, where preserved, 
tat provides the essential and most effective educational 
laterial for the reproduction and increase of the special 
values they created. 

CREATIVE EPOCHS AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 

That is the real justification of the use of the past for 
present and future education. It is the living past alone 
the past which reveals most clearly and powerfully 
the living issues of the present that can claim to provide 
material for ' educative ' instruction, because it represents 
values for the present and the future. 



48 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

This, therefore, is what justifies the prominent place 
given to Greek and Roman Literature and History in a 
modern system of education. Out of them have come 
in the main those values of truth, beauty and law without 
which no European civilization has existed or can ever 
exist . 

It is also and equally the supreme justification for 
the use of the New Testament, and to a lesser degree of 
the Old Testament in modern education. The history 
we have in the New Testament is in a supreme degree 
the kind of history which must always claim the attention 
of the educator. It represents a movement of moral 
originality, of religious awakening, of enterprise and 
ideals. It is not primarily a history of organization 
and abstract theological doctrine, but of overflowing 
spiritual life of religion as a driving impulse from above, 
as creative emotion, as living thought and expanding 
activity. There is no movement in history so intimately 
and essentially connected not only with the spread but 
also with the creation of so many of the central moral 
values which dominate the highest forms of thought, 
sentiment and activity of modern life. Apart from the 
specifically religious values themselves, the best elements 
in modern civilization are represented by the ethical 
interpretation of the universe, the spiritual interpreta- 
tion of nature and history, the principle of ethical inward- 
ness, the interpenetration of morality and religion, the 
modern emphasis on personality, the value of the in- 
dividual, the organic conception of society, universal 
brotherhood, democracy, the supremacy of active love, 
moral freedom and a number of other similar ideas and 
ideals. These are one and all more or less intimately 
associated with the early history of the Christian Gospel, 
and more or less clearly represented in it. 

It is probable that the prophetic movement in Israel, 
some aspects of Judaism, Roman Law, the Mystery- 
Cults of the East, Stoicism and other movements of the 
Hellenistic civilization, going back to Aristotle, Plato 
and Socrates, had a larger share than many Christian 
apologists realize in preparing the way for these ideals, 
and were significant factors in their origin. 



PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 49 

All the same, there is no other record in history in 
which their essential nature and the co-ordination of so 
many of them are so effectively portrayed as in the 
significant parts of the New Testament. There is none 
in which their origin is recorded in a form so suitable 
for educational purposes or wherein such powerful help 
offered and such impetus given for their reproduction 
personal and social life. A brief reference to some of 
e main educational features of the New Testament will 
irfice to make clear its possibilities in this respect. 



EDUCATIONAL FEATURES OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

THE CONFLICT OF IDEALS 

i . One of the elements in the literature of the New 
Testament which give its presentation of moral and 
spiritual values this extraordinary educational power is 
that it is no mere intellectual account of their origin 
and meaning, but is a living picture of their actual 
emergence and progress to supremacy in and through 
strenuous conflict between them and the traditional 
ideals which they replaced. In the New Testament we 
can actually see the new and the old locked in a life and 
death struggle. Moreover, it provides us not with one 
form only, but with varied expressions of this conflict. 

It is a commonplace among educators that in com- 
parison and contrast we have a factor of peculiar signifi- 
cance in the process of education. It means, therefore, 
a considerable addition to the educative power of the 
New Testament that in it we see the new moral and 
spiritual values emerging in conflict with the old ideals 
already in possession of the field, and that in the records 
of Jesus, Paul and John especially we have that conflict 
in several different forms. 



50 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

THE LITERATURE OF PERSONALITY 

2. A still greater significance is given to the New 
Testament as educative material by the fact that it brings 
before us these spiritual values incorporated in person- 
alities of great power, sanity and clarity. Practically all 
its material is the direct expression of personality and is 
gathered round a series of great personalities. It is first 
and foremost a literature of personal power. It is the 
fact that the writers have succeeded in bringing before 
us so vividly the figures of Peter, Paul, John (whether 
Apostle or not) and most of all Jesus it is this which 
gives the New Testament its most prominent peculiarity. 
Even those parts which seem at first sight to fall into 
the region of history in the sense of events and even 
the teaching, doctrinal discussions and questions of 
organization are best appreciated, best understood and 
best used in direct connection with this personal element. 
This is especially true of the Letters of Paul. For educa- 
tional purposes, their greatest value lies not in what they 
say about theological doctrines or the organization of 
the Church, but in the light they cast upon the life, work 
and personal religion of the Apostle himself. 

" By what quality," asks Dr. Felix Adler, " in them- 
selves or fortunate constellation of circumstances did 
Homer and the Biblical writers succeed ... in creating 
types of the utmost universality and yet imparting to 
them the breath of life, the gait and accent of distinctive 
individuality ? I imagine that they succeeded because 
they lived at a time when life was much less complex 
than it is at present, when the conversation, the manners, 
the thoughts, the motives of men were simple. They were 
enabled to individualize the universal because the most 
universal, the simplest motives, still formed the main- 
spring in the conduct of individuals . It was not necessary 
for them to enter into the barren region of abstraction 
and generalization to discover the universal. They pic- 
tured what they actually saw." l 

Such a general explanation may be adequate for the 
Old Testament, but the age of the New Testament was in 

1 The Moral Instruction of Children, pp. 108-9. 






PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 51 

its way as complex an age as our own, and the tendency 
towards abstractions was perhaps even greater. It 
would be truer to say that in contrast with their age in 
general, the men and writers of the New Testament lived 
so entirely in the region of the great moral and spiritual 
simplicities that the concrete personal picture of them 
naturally and inevitably attains universality. 

In any case, the fact is that the New Testament 
writers have actually succeeded in depicting great per- 
sonalities of distinctive individuality who are at the same 
time types of the utmost universality. Teaching the New 
Testament essentially means making these men live again 
in the mind and heart and conscience of our scholars. 
Whatever else we do or leave undone, this must remain our 
central task, and the tragedy of our present-day teaching 
is that our whole curriculum is framed in such a way as 
to prevent this being done in any effective way. We are 
bringing men into contact with the written word rather 
than the living souls behind it. We are teaching books 
instead of men, and we leave them with abstract and dead 
ideas instead of concrete, personal inspiration. All the 
energy of our educational passion should be thrown into 
the task of presenting the life, work and personality of 
Paul, and still more of Jesus, in such a way as to do their 
work once more upon the minds and hearts and the souls 
of the youth ; and for the sake of our Gospel, we should 
be willing to sacrifice everything else in order to do 
that. 

This realization of the supreme spiritual values in 
personal, individual forms especially in Jesus Christ, 
whose character runs on such extraordinarily clear, simple 
and pure lines means a great addition to educational 
efficiency as compared with the presentation of the ideal 
in and for itself. " Logical or mathematical truth," says 
Dr. Barbour, " attains universality by a sacrifice of the 
concrete ; while moral truth gains universal assent 
the assent of will above all only in so far as it appeals 
to the imagination and rouses the slumbering ideals in 
the hearts of all. Further, since it is directed to action, 
it is most cogent when it appears not as a formula, which 
still needs translation into terms of practice, but as a 



52 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

living example, showing what goodness is in reality and 
deed." 1 

A UNIFIED SYSTEM OF VALUES 

3. The result of this incorporation of spiritual values 
in personalities like Paul and Jesus is that what we get 
in the New Testament, and especially in Christ, is not 
merely a number of separate disconnected ideals or a 
series of independent moral and religious values side by 
side, but a whole unified system of values. What marks 
Him is what has been called a ' transvaluation of all 
values.' What is revealed in Him is a whole new spiritual 
life and world a new orientation of all values which is 
for Him and becomes for His disciples through Him the 
ultimate, the divine life that * new man ' and f newness 
of life ' of which Paul speaks. There is no need to labour 
the point that without this element of unity and con- 
sistency there can be no thorough appreciation and 
assimilation of the separate and independent values of 
life one by one. "Judgments of value," says Professor 
Seth Pringle-Pattison, " . . . are not to be taken ... as 
so many detached and mutually independent pronounce- 
ments of one faculty or another upon particular features 
or aspects of the world. They represent rather so many 
parts of one fundamental judgment in which the nature 
of reality, as exhibited in the system, may be said to 
affirm itself. Every particular judgment depends for its 
ultimate sanction on the recognition of its object as a 
contributory element to this inclusive whole." 2 

THE SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE OF EARLY CHRISTIAN 
PERSONALITIES 

4. One other element at least deserves to be men- 
tioned in any attempt at some general appreciation of 
the educational value of the New Testament. Its great 
personalities as the revealers and bearers of a new spiritual 
life and world do not appear merely as isolated individuals 
fighting simply for their own spiritual emancipation, but 

1 A Philosophical Study of Christian Ethics, p. 299. 

2 The Idea of God, p. 223. 



PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 53 

as, in their different ways, leaders of group-movements. 
Their appearance and activities have an essentially social 
significance. This is the case not only with regard to 
Jesus and Paul in their different ways. All the other 
representative figures also Peter, Luke and Mark, as 
well as John and the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews 
are not only typical figures in themselves, but even in 
their writings they probably have behind them social 
groups and circles with fairly well-defined types of thought 
and Christian attitude which they represent. 

This also implies a definite addition to the educative 
value and power of the history and literature of the New 
Testament. 

It is very probable that further consideration of the 
material of the New Testament, from this point of view, 
will bring to light other elements which will help to sub- 
stantiate its claim to be and to remain the most significant 
material in any intelligent and thorough system of modern 
education and instruction. 

If it is the aim of education to preserve and increase 
the values which give meaning and power to modern life 
as a whole, then undoubtedly all serious educators must 
look upon the New Testament as a most significant 
element in the material at their disposal. There is no 
other extant literature, neither Jewish, Greek nor Latin, 
which brings together within so manageable a compass 
such a vivid record and living picture of the origin and 
spread of those intrinsic values and moral ideals which 
alone make modern life worth living. If there are other 
records which perform the same or a similar service for 
some of these ideals, there is no other which puts their 
creative material into such sharp contrast with the old, 
shows them going forth conquering and to conquer with 
such power, incorporates them in such personal, individual 
and yet universal forms, reveals them so much as a unified 
system and gives them such social significance. That 
means to say, there is no other which presents the material 
in so essential and so natural an educative form as the New 
Testament. 

All these qualities in the New Testament, quite apart 
from its subsequent history, its general contribution to 



54 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

the civilization of Europe and its educational traditions, 
provide adequate justification for its very large use in 
education, and that because of the very nature and form 
of its contents. 

They will also help to make clear the proper and 
peculiar place of the New Testament in the process of 
education, and the definite stage at which its use will 
become most effective. 

3 

THE NEW TESTAMENT AND ADOLESCENCE 

Having thus marked out the general function of the 
New Testament in Education and enumerated some of 
the qualities which make it supremely capable of per- 
forming that function, we now proceed to ask where it 
fits most naturally into the process of Christian education ? 
Is there any point at which we must almost inevitably 
turn to the New Testament for our material ? Is it 
particularly adapted for infancy or youth or maturity ? 
Or can it be used indiscriminately at all ages ? Is there 
any particular stage at which we can with any confidence 
say : It is just here that the peculiar contribution of 
the New Testament comes naturally to its own in moral 
and religious instruction and education ? 

GRADING THE MATERIAL 

There is no need to emphasize the fact that we have 
here one of our fundamental educational problems, the 
answer to which ought practically to decide the whole 
framework of our moral and religious curriculum. The 
traditional practice was to drop a New Testament passage 
down anywhere, and, as in the case of the old International 
Lessons, this practice was based upon the supposition 
that every part of the Bible provides suitable material 
for all ages. The modern study of educational Psychology, 
however, has by this time driven that theory out of the 
field, but not always with the result of dismissing the 
practice that corresponds to it. We all recognize that 



PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 55 

the moral and religious growth of the individual is divided 
into the periods of Infancy, Childhood and Adolescence 
before maturity each with its own peculiar character- 
istics, needs, interests and capacities. We are not, 
however, so ready to apply that principle in any thorough 
way to the disposition of the Biblical material. 

So far as the New Testament is concerned, there can 
be no question as to the period to which its material as a 
whole belongs. In its present form it is the natural food of 
Adolescence. That period provides the one great oppor- 
tunity of the Christian Gospel and the New Testament. 
It is only then that we can speak in any full sense of 
teaching the New Testament. We may even go so far 
as to say that it is then or not at all, so far as all human 
educational means are of any importance. Before that 
time, we can only prepare the way for the great lesson. 
Our educational opportunity is, to all intents and pur- 
poses, lost, unless the Christian motive, the Christian 
ideal and power have found a home in heart and mind 
and will before maturity is reached. All the evidence of 
Psychology and experience, of history and New Testa- 
ment study, points directly to the fact that the Christian 
Gospel is the Gospel of Youth, that the New Testament, 
both in the character and form of its content, is especially 
adapted for the needs of youth, and that youth in its 
need and capacity cries out for both. For the full 
psychological, historical and educational evidence for 
these statements the reader must be referred to the 
one great study of Adolescence by Dr. Stanley Hall. 

FEATURES OF ADOLESCENCE 

For every individual the years between thirteen and 
twenty-four are the most fateful years of life the years 
that make or mar almost without exception. With the 
gradual passing of childhood begins the great flowering 
time of the human spirit in Adolescence and Youth. 
' This is the golden period of life, when all that is greatest 
and best in heart and will are at their strongest. If 
the race ever advances to higher levels, it must be by 
increments at this stage, for all that follows it is marked 



56 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

by decline." 1 " True religion culminates in Youth, and 
doctrine is its substitute and memorial in maturity and 
old age. Youth has far more to teach in this field, if it 
only knew how, than it can learn from age." 2 The glory 
of its triumphs no tongue can tell, while its tragedies are 
too deep for tears. Abundant, overflowing life comes 
pouring into mind and heart and will into body and 
soul ; and life goes pouring out again prodigally and 
recklessly in tumbling waves of contradictory activities. 
The child leaves the quiet haven to embark upon a sea 
of troubles significant enough even when most imaginary 
its tiny bark at the mercy of every wind that blows 
and every wave that breaks. It is an exploring, expand- 
ing, adventurous time, a time of hopeless fears, of fearless 
and fearful hopes, a time of boundless faiths and of dark 
despair, of love that mars and of love that makes. It 
scales the heights of heaven and there meets God, or it 
may descend and be singed with the fires of hell. The 
only thing it may not do is to jog contentedly along 
the conventional paths of earth. 

Only a confusion of metaphors can attempt to describe 
this period, for it is not a world but a chaos a chaos 
waiting for the Spirit to move upon the face of the waters 
and for the divine word : " Let there be light." If the 
light does come it will come with creative power which 
will probably mark out for ever the boundaries of earth 
and sky, of land and sea, and in the end make man out 
of the dust of the earth. 

But if Youth does come to the light, it must come in 
its own free way. It snaps at external control, and no 
Creed or Dogma can hold it. Its teacher must be its 
comrade and its lover first of all ready to start at any 
moment on any great adventure or any forlorn hope. 
Yet no age will bend so utterly before its chosen gods. 
Indeed, the first and greatest task of the educator is to 
reveal to Youth the gods to choose from, give him as many 
strong examples as he can gather of the better choice 
the teacher's own among the rest and then murmur 
reverently, " If Youth but knew " the God to choose. 

1 Stanley Hall, Educational Problems, vol. i. p. 163. 

2 Stanley Hall, Adolescence, vol. ii. p. 317. 



PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 57 

It shames us to think how mean and puny, how 
haphazard and helpless, is the service we render Youth. 
We are fathers who give him stones when he begs for 
bread. We are teachers who shake the mailed fist in 
his face when he leaps to the intimate clasp of the naked 
ind. We shock his modesty and drag his secret shames 
;o the light of day. We laugh at his seriousness and 
teer at his dreams. We stamp upon his tragic doubts, 
re chill his enthusiasm and but too often leave him to 
sink or swim in the storm and stress of the spirit. If he 
>ut seldom drowns, that is more often due to his natural 
>uoyancy than to our care. We do our best to keep 
dm unregenerate, and he converts himself in spite of us, 
ind worships as his chosen gods the dreams and ideals 
rhich we have cast away before middle age as far " too 
ich and good for human nature's daily food." 

You ask what can our ordinary, mechanical Biblical 
Instruction do for such a being as this ? Nothing but 
larm. What can even the best instruction do ? Little 
enough, perhaps, but yet that little may be enough to 
make all the difference. Youth needs ideas, and ideas, 
and still more ideas, all the living ideas and the significant 
facts, incarnate in the dominating personalities and 
movements of history the great spiritual permanent 
values in myriad forms of truth, beauty and goodness. 
He needs to rediscover them for himself and to reproduce 
them with those who first saw the face divine, so that he 
may conserve and increase them for the world to come. 
That is the demand of the universe upon him, for the 
measure of its progress is the measure of Youth's response 
to that call. Youth is life and makes life. There never 
is anything else in the world, and no one else but those 
who stand and wait to do his bidding. 

ADOLESCENT FEATURES OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

There is no record that answers so readily and so 
fully to the call of Youth, nor one that by obedience to 
his call is capable of ruling him so completely, as the 
New Testament and what it represents. Dr. Stanley 
Hall returns again and again to underline the fact that 



58 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

the New Testament needs Youth, that Youth needs the 
New Testament, and that in its story is eternal youth. 

" At the top of the curve of life comes Christianity, 
for ever supreme because it is the norm for the apical 
stage of human development, glorifying adolescence and 
glorified by it, and calculated to retain and conserve 
youth before the decline of the highest powers of the 
soul in maturity and age." l 

11 The story of Jesus's life, psychologically treated, 
whatever else it may be, is also another abridged and 
variant edition of the same import (namely, of adolescent 
experience). There is the glimpse of an early life of 
natural growth in favour of God and man. At the age 
of early Oriental puberty he is already characteristically 
pondering the highest themes with deepening sense of 
wrong and human need, a glimmering, conscious higher 
mission struggling with temporal ambition, a long con- 
flict of the noblest adolescent idealism that ever was 
with the hard, inveterate conservatism of a decadent 
age and senescent man, with bigotry, hypocrisy and 
shame, ending in defeat, the self-effacement of a shameful 
death ; then the inevitable resurgam motive, at first 
incredulous and apparitional, with ascension or sublima- 
tion as the climax, but which later became the very 
substance of the Christian faith and the corner-stone 
of belief in Jesus's deity and our regeneration." 2 

" Thus the story of the Cross, which is the chief symbol 
of Christianity, known by multitudes who know nothing 
else of Jesus, when relived and vitally participated in, 
is the best of all initiatives to maturity." . . . 

" The Gospel story is the most adequate, classic and 
dramatic representation of the truest formulae of the most 
critical revolution of life, to successfully accomplish 
which is to make catharsis of our lower nature and to 
attain full ethical maturity without arrest or perversion : 
this is the very meaning of adolescence. As Jesus, the 
totemic embodiment of the race, gathered, unified and 
epitomized in His own life the many elements of autosoteric 
motive that were before scattered and relatively ineffective, 
and made thereby a new focus of history to which so 

1 Op. cit., ii. 361. 2 Op. cit., ii. 333~4- 






PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 59 

many lines before converged, from which they have since 
diverged ; so each youth can now, thanks to Him, condense 
in his own life the essential experience of the race by 
sympathetic participation in this great psychopheme." 1 

" Adolescence is the time when Jesus 's character, 
example and teaching is most needed. He was Himself 
essentially an adolescent. . . . Jesus came to and for 
adolescents, in a very special and very peculiar and till 
lately not understood sense, and just as it is pedagogically 
wrong to force Him upon childhood, it is wrong not to 
teach Him to adolescents. Their need is so great as to 
constitute a mission motive of even more warmth and 
force than those that now prevail. No matter for what 
creed, race or civilization, and no matter what we think 
about His deity or even the veracity of the record, I am 
convinced that there is no career or character in history 
or literature which so fully meets the deepest needs, 
supplements the weaknesses and defects, and strengthens 
all the good impulses of this period as His." 2 

It has been added that the first disciples were also 
in the adolescent stage of life,^and so was Paul, when 
they were all swept into the Christian movement. The 
whole period covered by the main record of the New 
Testament may indeed easily be written in terms of 
adolescent experience with its expanding thought, life 
and activity, with its enthusiasms and passion and ferment, 
with its exuberant ecstasies and visions and its apocalyptic 
dreams, with its freedom and its daring and its impatience 
of all authority and organization. The whole picture 
is one of the overflowing freshness of youth youth, of 
course, in spirit and not in the flesh. We lose count of 
the age in years of men like Paul, for we see the Gospel 
of the New Testament creating and re-creating the spirit 
of youth within them, prolonging adolescence to middle 
age and making even the old men dream dreams. 

ADOLESCENT INTEREST IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 

Actual experience and experiment also go to show that 
the New Testament is thus the natural food for adolescence. 

1 Op. cit., ii. 337. 2 Stanley Hall, Educational Problems, vol. i. 163. 



60 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

" It seems to be a fact/' says Professor G. A. Coe, " that 
interest in the New Testament, especially the Gospels 
and the Acts, becomes acute not far from the end of early 
adolescence. This is the time when we should expect 
the inner life of Christ and the Apostles to become in- 
teresting." i Mr. G. E. Dawson investigated the subject 
of " Children's Interest in the Bible " between the ages 
of eight and twenty, and found that between eight and 
thirteen the predominant interest was in the Old Testa- 
ment. After that, this interest steadily decreases, while 
that in the New increases, until at twenty the Old can 
only claim the preference of 10 per cent, of the boys, 
while the New Testament claims the interest of 90 per cent. 
Again, the interest in the life and person of Jesus is very 
little at the early ages of eight, nine, ten and eleven, but 
it steadily grows as the years go by until it reaches its 
height between fifteen and twenty. 2 

This correspondence between the New Testament and 
Adolescence is confirmed by every feature of these writings 
which was mentioned in the previous section. We saw 
that it is the literature of the creative epoch of the great 
ideals, that it shows them in conflict with the old, that it 
gives them in personal forms, that it therefore reveals 
them not as separate fragments, but as a unified system 
of values, and gives them, moreover, a social significance. 

In fact, it is impossible to avoid the conclusion that 
the New Testament belongs peculiarly to youth, and youth 
belongs to it by native right. It is his book and his 
world. It came forth out of his mouth, and it shall not 
return unto him void, but it shall accomplish that which 
he pleases and it shall prosper in the thing whereto he 
sent it. Its voice ought to ring in the ears of the waiting 
youth of every generation, saying in the accents of God : 
' Ye shall go out with joy and be led forth with peace : 
to the mountains and to the hills breaking out before 
you into singing : and to all the trees of the field clapping 
their hands." 

1 Education in Religion and Morals, p. 294 n. 

2 Fed. Sem., vol. vii. p. 151. 



PLACE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN EDUCATION 61 

THE NEW TESTAMENT THE NATURAL FOOD OF YOUTH 

The New Testament belongs to youth by right divine, 
and youth belongs to it by human need the New Testa- 
ment, of course, not merely as the mechanical record 
and written word, the text of conventional commentary 
and the pretended source of rigid creed, but the New 
Testament as the clear mirror of youth's reckless adven- 
ture into the realm of moral revolution, of Jesus and 
Paul and Peter and John who came to turn the world 
upside down. This New Testament is youth's natural 
food and drink, the air he must breathe and the sun that 
shines upon him, just as Jesus is his natural Saviour 
and Lord by the authority of His illimitable faith and love. 
It is the Temple of the Holy Spirit of Youth, though we 
have often made it into a den of thieves. 

All this does not mean that no part of the material 
of the New Testament can be effectively adapted for use 
at any other time than adolescence, but only that it 
cannot be used with the full purpose and import of the 
original writers ; and that only subordinate fragments 
are in their present form appropriate at any earlier stage. 
For instance, we can and ought to tell some of the stories 
of the New Testament, and especially the life of Jesus in 
some form, during the years of childhood. What, how- 
ever, we must recognize is that we cannot then give its 
full Christian meaning to that life. We can only deal 
with some aspects of it which are in line with the interests, 
the needs and the experience of the child. He may thus be 
prepared for the fuller lesson later on, but the material 
must be shorn of some of its meaning in order to do so. 

The real educational inference is that the whole 
weight of teaching the New Testament in any full sense 
should fall in the adolescent period, and that the whole 
curriculum should be framed with that end in view. The 
character and form of its contents is specially adapted for 
that purpose, while the natural interests of adolescence 
make the work easier and more effective then than at any 
other time. When we try to do the same work at any 
other period, we are very largely wasting our time and only 
making the task more difficult at the proper time. 



62 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

The great problem, therefore, of the instruction of 
youth in the New Testament is the problem of letting 
him come to his own to enter upon his natural heritage. 
It is the problem of helping him to rediscover and to re- 
produce with Jesus, and by His power, the supreme spiritual 
values which Jesus discovered and produced, and which 
youth alone can conserve and increase from generation to 
generation. 

BOOKS 

CLUTTON-BROCK (A.). The Ultimate Belief. (London, 1919.) 
HALL (STANLEY). Adolescence. (New York and London, 1915.) 
RICHMOND (K.). The Permanent Values in Education. (London, 1917.) 



CHAPTER IV 

THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

1. The Practical Character of the New Testament. The Different 

Aspects of the New Testament Literature History Religion 
The Missionary Character of the New Testament Need of an 
Educational Interpretation Some Misconceptions of its Meaning. 

2. The Educational Study of the New Testament. The Different Types 

of Material The Essential Elements of the Educational Process 
Ideals and their Realization. 

3. Illustrations and Examples. Educational Study of the Second 

Coming The Parousia in the New Testament Its Place and 
Value in the New Testament Application to Types of Thought 
and to Personalities. 

4. Results of the Study. The Rich Variety of the New Testament 

The Gift and the Demand The Educational Value of this 
Variety The Need for Unity and Application. 



THE PRACTICAL CHARACTER OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

THE preceding discussion has revealed the fact that the 
New Testament as a whole provides material of supreme 
value for all education directed towards moral and spiritual 
ends. It has also shown that the teacher of youth in 
particular is called imperatively to its study. 

VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

Many other types of students, it is true, have legiti- 
mate interests in the New Testament, and in varying 
degrees can claim it as part of their peculiar heritage and 
material. 

63 



64 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

The New Testament belongs to the great literature of 
the world. In its own Hellenistic period and its own 
Hellenistic tongue it towers far above all the literary 
records of the time in originality, power and beauty, while 
in many of its translations also it has attained the for- 
mative place in the development of literary style. It is 
no wonder, therefore, that the student of literature as 
such rejoices in it and claims it as his own. 

The New Testament is also the record of the origin of 
a great historical movement, destined to become in some 
form or other one of the decisive factors in the develop- 
ment of the civilization of Europe. Its material, therefore, 
naturally belongs to the general historian. 

It is, moreover, the history in particular of the genesis 
and spread of a religion and that the most significant 
religion in the history of the world. It is therefore 
legitimately claimed as his own by the student of religion 
and the religions, and, of course, still more peculiarly it 
belongs to the historian of Christianity. Among the 
many workers in this field the Christian theologian, both 
as the historian and the philosopher of Christian Doctrine, 
has insistently and until recently with success claimed 
the New Testament as his own peculiar source and 
material. 

THE MISSIONARY CHARACTER OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

Within definite limits all these claims can, of course, 
be amply justified. There is great literature, great 
history and in particular a great religious and theological 
history in these writings. Yet it is neither the literary 
man, nor the historian, nor the theologian who has the 
first and supreme claim upon the New Testament, but 
the practical teacher of the Christian Gospel whether 
as missionary or preacher or catechist or Christian teacher 
in the narrower sense. Every book in the New Testament 
sets itself deliberately in some form or other to spread the 
Christian life, to confirm Christian faith, to create and 
deepen a Christian impression, to inspire Christian hopes, 
to clarify Christian ideas, to strengthen the Christian will 



THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION 65 

all of them different ways of teaching Christianity and 
different aspects of the Christian teacher's task. The 
definite aim of each writer is to create and train Christian 
disciples. Everything else is subordinate to that end. 
The writers use almost every kind of appeal for that 
purpose now a burst of eloquent prose, and again an 
historical account, now an appeal to personal religious 
experience, and again a theological argument. The New 
Testament is throughout an ' edifying ' book in the true 
sense of that much-abused word ; it is intended to build 
up, to construct Christian disciples and discipleship. 
Face to face with some actual concrete situation in 
actual life, there is everywhere an attempt to make some 
aspect of the Christian Gospel effective in it. 

It is, therefore, the man who, in whatever form, is 
trying to do the same work to-day it is he who is putting 
the material of the New Testament to its original and 
proper use. The teacher's study of it for the practical 
purposes of his task will naturally do fuller justice to 
its peculiar nature than that of either the mere historian 
or the scientific theologian. These books belong to the 
historian and to the theologian only in a secondary sense 
preparatory to its use for practical Christian purposes 
by the preacher and the teacher. It does not appear 
that any writer of the New Testament ever set out with 
the intention of constructing a system of theology or even 
of formulating a theological doctrine. 

There are theological ideas certainly in the New Testa- 
ment and fragments of many theological systems, but 
they are always introduced and employed for growing 
and enriching Christian faith and life. They are never, 
and probably can never be, brought into any complete 
theological unity or consistency. In the proper sense 
there is no such thing as a New Testament Theology, and 
even the task of constructing a Pauline Theology is very 
largely a matter of guesswork and of doubtful inferences 
from scattered and incidental references in a few of Paul's 
letters. We are always doing at least some injustice to 
the apostle and missionary when we use his incidental 
sayings for purposes they were never meant to serve. 
The writers of the New Testament can only have full 
5 



66 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

justice done to them in the world and work of preachers 
and teachers of Christ and His Gospel. 



THE NEED OF AN EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION 

How far the individual writings themselves achieved 
each its particular purpose of educating its first readers, 
of influencing them in the direction of the Christian 
Gospel, we do not and cannot now know in detail. That 
these writings have proved effective, and probably the 
most effective instrument to bring men to Christ many 
times since then, the history of almost every religious 
revival abundantly proves, while every man who reads 
them humbly, attentively and intelligently knows also 
their revolutionary power. 

The men who stand behind the New Testament 
writings certainly achieved a miraculous triumph in their 
practical task of moving the men and the world of their 
time effectively in a Christian direction by their living 
and preaching and teaching of the Christian Gospel. 
The rapid spread of Christianity throughout the Roman 
world from its obscure beginning in a far-away provincial 
village is not only a testimony to its own essential truth 
and power, but also to the effectiveness of the teaching 
and preaching by means of which the work was done. 
One of the chief meanings of the New Testament is that 
it gives us the only record of what must have been the 
most successful, practical and educational propaganda in 
history, and the only picture we have of the aims and 
methods of the missionaries, and of the ways and means 
they used. It gives us the Gospel as preached and taught 
in forms showing the wealth and variety of the interests 
and motives to which the teachers appealed. 

Whatever else the New Testament is, therefore, it is a 
supreme object-lesson for the work of the Christian teacher 
and preacher in every age. The men who still want to 
use it, to make Christians by teaching and preaching, by 
proclamation of the Gospel or by instruction, are the men 
who are putting the material of the New Testament to 
its own proper and peculiar use the original use for 



THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION 67 

which at least the greatest part of it was created and 
written. 

Even if these records were only great literature and 
history, a study of them for definitely educational pur- 
poses would certainly be fully justified, for it is in great 
literature and history that the educator must always find 
his educative material. They call for and demand such 
a study imperatively, because they owe their origin 
mainly to the needs of Christian instruction and educa- 
tion and will not reveal their full power under any other 
treatment. 



MISCONCEPTIONS OF ITS MEANING 

In thus calling for a definitely practical and educational 
interpretation and study of the New Testament, it may 
be well at the outset to guard against some possibility 
of misconception. The kind of study we have in mind 
is no substitute for a thoroughly scientific treatment. 
Neither is it something tacked on artificially to a literary 
and historical study of these writings. This practical 
study is itself part of our scientific study of the New 
Testament, essential to it, built upon a literary and 
historical study and helpless without it. Ultimately, 
indeed, it is in such an educational interpretation that we 
find the climax of the scientific method of approaching 
and dealing with the material of the New Testament and 
of revealing its full meaning and power. 

To such an educational interpretation there will be 
two aspects one descriptive and the other appreciative. 
The descriptive study will attempt to interpret the New 
Testament historically as the material actually used by 
the first teachers and preachers and missionaries of the 
Christian Gospel in their varied efforts to make Christians 
out of the people of their time. The second or apprecia- 
tive study will consider whether, how far and in what 
way the Christian teacher to-day can use the same 
material for the purpose of making Christian disciples in 
the twentieth century. It deals, that is to say, with the 
modern use to be made of the material gathered and 
arranged in the first part. It will be well to keep these 



68 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

two aspects of the educational study of the New Testa- 
ment separate from each other. 



THE EDUCATIONAL STUDY OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

Even a rapid survey of the various parts of the New 
Testament with the Herbartian ' formal steps ' in mind, 
will reveal at once how naturally its material falls into 
psychological and educational categories. And a merely 
formal educational arrangement of the New Testament 
thus suggested will not be without its value for the practical 
work of teaching. It will not, however, carry us very far, 
and in order to bring out the full significance of the 
material before us we shall need a more radical regrouping. 

We must think rather of the different types of educa- 
tional forces at our disposal in the New Testament, namely, 
its historical incidents, its ideas, its distinctive types of 
thought and its personalities. It is the business of the 
teacher to use each and all of these to set up an effective 
educational process in the mind and life of his pupils. 

Now the essential elements which make up the general 
apparatus of education may be reduced to three, and every 
educational process implies a constant interaction between 
them. 

In the first place, every new educational activity starts 
from some actual situation in life as it is. 

Secondly, it is the intention of every educational 
process to change that situation into some corresponding 
ideal. 

Thirdly, the educator brings, according to his oppor- 
tunities, some definite influences, powers and motives to 
bear upon the actual situation in order to produce the ideal 
he has in mind. 

THE MAIN ELEMENTS IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS 

That means to say that the teacher, in the general 
educative process as a whole and in each particular part 



THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION 69 

of it, must have before him some actual human situation 
which he desires to change in the direction of some ideal 
in which he believes, by means of some influences which 
he can organize and use for that purpose. 

It is evident, therefore, that in order to make a full 
educational study of the New Testament, we must proceed 
to analyse every incident, every idea, every type of 
thought, every personality and every book in the New 
Testament in such a way as to make plain to ourselves 
the nature of the human situation, the moral and spiritual 
ideal and the kind of motive-power that are involved in it. 

Naturally, with regard to a great many of the details 
of the New Testament, no very clear or satisfactory 
results can be expected from such an analysis. Their 
independent value is but slight, and it is only indirectly 
as part of a larger whole that they acquire any educational 
significance. Even that, however, it is well for the 
teacher to realize. It will help him to avoid the degrading 
' homiletic ' method of trying to squeeze a sermon or a 
lesson by ingenuity out of unimportant sayings or passages 
where neither sermon nor lesson is naturally to be found. 

IDEALS AND THEIR REALIZATION 

Such questions, however, become more and more 
applicable and appropriate with every step as we ascend 
from the particular incidents and ideas to the person- 
alities revealed in the New Testament. When we reach 
such personalities as Paul or Jesus, these questions lead 
us to the innermost secrets of the New Testament, and 
they become the only questions which are capable of 
bringing us face to face with its heart and soul. What 
did these men really want to do ? What was the actual 
situation faced by them ? What kind of ideal did they 
hold before men ? By what means do they attempt to 
move men in its direction ? How exactly do they try 
to help men ? To what motives do they appeal ? 

These are, after all, the vital questions with regard 
to any personality and especially the great dominating 
personalities of history. 

It is something of this kind that is meant when we 



70 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

speak of the educational study of the New Testament, 
and it will be seen that we are dealing almost entirely 
not with the external form or origin of the writings, but 
with their historical and intellectual content. This is 
not an arbitrary handling of the New Testament such as 
the old ' homiletic ' method very largely involved, nor is 
it independent of the scientific, historical and literary 
method of interpretation. It is definitely built upon the 
work of the historian and literary critic, and takes their 
results for granted. All questions of text, authorship, 
date, authenticity, historical value, literary form and 
even questions of exegesis in detail are already considered 
and judged before such a study can fruitfully begin. It 
is, moreover, itself in the first place a purely scientific 
historical study being only an attempt to describe the 
actual facts with regard to the New Testament and its 
writers. The use that may afterwards be made of the 
results of such a study by the modern Christian teacher 
and their value for his task to-day is a different matter 
altogether, which ought to be sharply distinguished from 
the historical study itself. We must shoulder the responsi- 
bility for the use we make of the material it provides, 
and must justify that use to ourselves and others at 
every step. 

3 
ILLUSTRATIONS AND EXAMPLES 

Let us see, then, exactly what is involved in a study 
of the material of the New Testament from this point of 
view, and what kind of results we may expect from it. 
Here, of course, we can only take one or two examples 
from the very varied and rich contents of the New 
Testament. 

EDUCATIONAL STUDY OF THE PAROUSIA 

One of the most prominent ideas in almost every part 
of the New Testament is that of the Parousia, or what is 
usually called the Second Coming of Christ. On the basis 



THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION 71 

of all that modern literary and historical criticism has 
told us about the history and different forms taken by 
this idea in the New Testament, what we particularly 
wish to know with regard to it is its educational value 
for the life, practical work and teaching of the first 
Christian teachers and preachers of the Christian Gospel. 
We are not at present concerned with its place and value 
in any modern Christian instruction. 

To get what we want, we have to address our three 
series of questions to this idea or belief : 

1 . What kind of ideal of life personal or social, moral 
or religious does this belief imply, embody or encourage ? 

How is it related to other aspects of the Christian 
hope and of the Christian ideal found in the New Testa- 
ment, as, for example, the Last Judgment, the Resurrec- 
tion, the Kingdom of God, etc. ? 

Does this belief stand at the centre of the New Testa- 
ment conception of the ideal, or only on its circumference ? 

Has it grown naturally out of the life of the Christian 
Gospel, or is it only a foreign element brought into 
Christian thought and life from elsewhere ? 

Having asked these and similar questions with regard 
to the type and ideal of life implied and encouraged by 
this belief in the Second Coming, we come next to a series 
of questions concerning the way in which the idea is used 
in the New Testament : 

2. Upon what kind of situation and circumstances is 
it brought to bear in the different writings of the New 
Testament ? 

For what special purpose do the different writers use 
it? 

3 . What is the nature and value of the appeal it makes ? 
How far is that appeal consistent with the central 

motives of the Christian Gospel ? 

What moral interests is it used to protect ? 

What kind of help does it give to a man like Paul to 
realize the Christian faith and life ? 

In what special ways does he and the other writers of 
the New Testament use the belief in order to help their 
readers ? 

Is it used mainly as an inspiration to renewed moral 



72 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

activity, or as a protection against forces hostile to faith, 
or as a comfort amidst evil circumstances ? 

Even to suggest the answer to such questions would 
lead us far beyond our limits. It would lead to a dis- 
cussion of the conception of Messiahship entertained by 
Jesus, of the place and value of the Eschatology of the 
Gospels, of the meaning and use of the title ' Son of Man/ 
of the different main forms taken by the idea of the 
Second Coming in the Primitive Church, in Paul and in 
John, of the way in which the early Christians generally 
threw most of their faith and hope into this particular 
form, and a multitude of other questions. 

THE PAROUSIA IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 

The belief does not stand by itself in the New Testa- 
ment, but is intimately connected with and a central 
element in the whole ' other- worldly/ eschatological 
conception of life which dominates so much of the 
thoughts and activities of the early Christians, and which 
is represented in the apocalyptic drama of the Resur- 
rection, the Last Judgment, the Messianic reign in the 
' world to come.' It was, however, the most living 
element in that drama, and it succeeded in giving new 
life to the dead Messianic formulae of Judaism because 
it was the Parousia of Jesus that was expected. It was 
especially one of the many forms in which was expressed 
the supreme significance of Jesus and the fact that all 
Christian hopes were centred in Him as the final victor 
over sin, Satan and death. In essence, therefore, it stood 
at the centre of the Christian faith, though in its pictorial 
form it was a belief borrowed bodily from Judaism. It 
is evident, however, that as an external eschatological 
form it soon became a danger to the Church, and John felt 
that it stood in need of being spiritualized and moralized 
before it could remain the permanent possession of the 
Church and Christian life. The value which it implies 
for a man like Paul is the supreme Christian ideal, but its 
form encouraged and embodied a strained ' other-worldly ' 
and dualistic type of piety, tending to turn men's thoughts 
away from the tasks of the present, as it did among the 



THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION 73 

Thessalonians. The author of the Fourth Gospel was 
therefore led to substitute for it the belief in the abiding 
presence of Jesus with His disciples. 

On the other hand, it has been claimed that " the 
social side of Christianity is, as it were, masked under the 
idea of the Parousia. It is masked but also conserved ; 
for so long as the idea of the Parousia remained, there 
was no fear that acquiescence in the present evil order 
would react hurtfully upon Christian faith and morality. 
Had it not been for the Parousia hope, the Early Church 
might have been prematurely hurled against the Empire 
as a revolutionary force, or through enforced acquiescence 
in its evils have become a merely pietistic association, a 
new Essenism on a larger scale." 1 That means to say 
that the belief in the Parousia played the same part in 
early Christianity which the doctrine of the inevitable 
Class War and the doctrine of the catastrophic Social 
Revolution have played in the history of modern 
Socialism. 



VALUE OF THE IDEA OF THE PAROUSIA 

The actual situations upon which the belief is brought 
to bear range from the unbelief of the Jews, both at the 
trial of Jesus and in the early history of the Church at 
Jerusalem, to the despair of the Christian disciples when 
face to face with persecution in the Apocalypse and else- 
where. In both cases an appeal is made to the Parousia 
of Jesus as the full justification of Christian faith and the 
full revelation of its truth. In its name defiance is hurled 
at the strongest enemies, and they are dared to do their 
worst. 

It is plain that there was no appeal which gripped the 
early Christians in general more strongly than the appeal 
to the Parousia. Its basis was the Jewish doctrine of 
Retribution. It meant the punishment of the evil- 
doer and the reward of the righteous. But in Paul and 
the other great figures the belief takes an ever higher and 
more spiritual form. Paul learnt later to inspire and 

1 Quoted in Fairweather, The Background of the Gospels, p. 307 ; from Cairns, 
Christianity in the Modern World. 



74 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

comfort himself with the hope of a full and perfect com- 
munion with the Lord after death rather than that of the 
Lord's visible presence on earth ; and in the end the 
Parousia becomes the symbol of a kingdom of spiritual 
glory ruled by Christ and God the guarantee of the full 
possession of which is already present in the power and 
influence of the Spirit. 

We have, therefore, in the New Testament Parousia 
an idea which covers almost all the forms of the early 
Christian ideal from the crudest Jewish eschatology up 
to the Pauline identification of the Spirit of Christ with 
the Holy Spirit and to the Johannine identification of the 
Spirit with the Advocate. It is used in practice as the 
strongest inspiration to Christian moral activity, as a 
comfort in evil circumstances of all kinds, and it served to 
protect for the time being the supreme value of Jesus 
Christ ; while continually in its cruder forms it tended to 
encourage a strained, ecstatic, unbalanced type of piety, 
and at the same time a legal conception of God's relation 
to men both of which were only sub-Christian in character 
and value. 

These are some of the lines upon which our practical, 
ethical and educational study with regard to such an 
idea as the Parousia must proceed. The facts which 
emerge from such a study are those which the teacher of 
the New Testament must bear in mind when he comes to 
consider the question of the place and value of the whole 
eschatological world of the New Testament for his present- 
day task of making Christians. 



4 
RESULTS OF THE STUDY 

THE VARIETY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

When the New Testament is studied from the point 
of view and for the purpose suggested in the preceding 
section, we get an almost bewildering impression of the 
wealth and variety of the interests and motives to which 



THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION 75 

the first Christian teachers appealed on behalf of their 
Gospel. We find ourselves in an armoury full of the 
weapons of Christian warfare in almost endless variety. 
In how many different ways, for instance, do the writers 
express what the Gospel brings to men ; what various 
ways they have of describing the Christian ideal of life. 
Now it is the Kingdom of God ; now Sonship to God 
the Father ; again it is union with Christ, and then life 
in the Spirit ; now it is communion with God, then the 
perfect life and again the life of love. It is forgiveness 
of sins, justification by faith, eternal life, the Cross, the 
Resurrection, reconciliation or peace with God and love 
towards God and the neighbour. 

The motives and interests appealed to, the powers 
called upon on behalf of the ideal, are even more various 
in character than are the forms in which the ideal itself 
is expressed. Now they are almost crudely utilitarian 
and then they are purely spiritual. Now they are 
eschatological and then they are moral. They range 
from earthly prosperity and misfortune through heaven 
and hell to faith and hope and love. 

The many forms in which the ideal and its different 
values and aspects are described are nowhere reduced to 
any recognizable system or unity. We find them there 
in the different writers, simply placed side by side as 
actually used on different occasions. Sometimes the 
different forms are inconsistent with each other even in 
the same writer. Sometimes also the ideal itself and the 
means employed to enforce it seem to us inconsistent 
with each other. Their untold wealth, however, and 
their almost endless variety when studied as they were 
actually used in the first and most heroic attempt ever 
made on behalf of the Gospel, become a supreme object- 
lesson for the Christian teacher. 

It is for us to decide how far the material thus used 
in the first century still holds good for the Christian 
education of the youth and children of to-day. They 
are not of necessity the only means nor of necessity the 
best means for twentieth-century teachers to employ in 
order to effect the same purpose. It was certainly only 
for the men and women of the first century that the 



76 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

material of the New Testament was created or borrowed 
and used. It was not written at all for children, and 
neither Jesus nor Paul was dreaming of a period of recon- 
struction after a great and disastrous European war. 

A GIFT AND A DEMAND 

If one were allowed to voice in a few words the first 
message of the New Testament to us as Christian teachers, 
it would be in some such terms as the following : 

" These are the various forms in which the Christian 
Gospel, ideals and values were preached and taught when 
they first appeared, not systematically arranged, but 
simply side by side. This is human nature, this is human 
need as the first Christian teachers saw them ; these are 
the special conditions and needs which they tried to meet . 
These are the ways in which they met them ; these are 
the methods they used ; these are the motives and 
interests, the instruments they employed in their appeal 
when trying to change the men and the conditions in the 
direction of the ideal life of the Gospel. Once more they 
are not systematically arranged. They are not always 
consistent with each other, but they are here as they 
were actually used by very different men in very different 
circumstances. 

" It is now left to you to show that this ideal or Gospel, 
thus described, is still the ideal or Gospel for the twentieth 
century, and whether it can be so in any or all of its 
New Testament forms or not. 

" It is left to you to obtain such accurate knowledge 
of the men, women and children, the conditions and needs 
of your time, that you will be able to show how they are 
different or similar to those of the New Testament, and 
so adapt your teaching to those similarities or differences. 

11 It is left to you, finally, to show how far the means 
and motives used in the New Testament are still effective 
in changing your conditions and your men, women and 
children in the direction of the Christian ideal." 

So may be described the first free gift of the New 
Testament to the modern Christian teacher, and such 
are its imperative demands upon him. 



THE EDUCATIONAL INTERPRETATION 77 



EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF THE VARIETY 

The kind of study that has been suggested, one may 
venture to call a more practical and educational inter- 
pretation of the contents of the New Testament than 
the ordinary methods provide. Even the first-fruits of 
such a study may be of direct use for the Christian teacher 
in his work, quite apart from any systematic valuation 
of them in relation to definite modern needs. 

Many of our lessons and of our sermons should be 
devoted simply and solely to an objective transmission 
of the direct results of such a reading of the New Testa- 
ment. Especially in our raw youth, when we have not 
very much direct personal Christian experience to fall 
back upon, such a practice would be refreshing both for 
teacher and pupil, for the preacher and his people. In 
any case, in these days, it is very necessary work. When 
we feel, as we must often do, that we have no very urgent 
personal message of our own to give, the most effective 
substitute is to put up another man to deliver his message 
in his own way through us. Such objective teaching and 
preaching, deliberately and openly undertaken, would save 
us from a good deal of compulsory hypocrisy. 

Quite apart from its personal advantage, however, 
such a method enables us to show in an objective way, 
without any polemic, that in the actual Scriptures them- 
selves, different and sometimes inconsistent views of the 
Christian aim and ideal, as well as very different methods 
of reaching them, stand side by side. There is no more 
effective and yet unobjectionable way not only of teaching 
the methods and results of modern Biblical Criticism, but 
also of inculcating the spirit of tolerance, than by objective 
descriptions of this kind. There might be given, for 
instance, objective pictures of Peter and Paul with their 
different aims and methods, appealing to different motives 
and interests yet both of them prominent disciples of 
Jesus. Or with equal effect one might give a practical 
interpretation of the Gospel of Mark, and side by side 
with it of the Fourth Gospel ; or, of the Epistle to the 
Galatians side by side with the Epistle to the Hebrews, 



78 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

comparing and contrasting them in their aims and ideals, 
in their methods and means. 

The rich variety, therefore, of the New Testament 
and even its inconsistencies have an independent educa- 
tional significance and value of their own which should 
not be neglected. 

It is impossible, however, for the teacher to rest 
content in this variety, however rich it may be. It 
becomes inevitably a part of his educational task to 
inquire whether there is any possibility of reducing this 
variety into some kind of unity to classify and harness 
the varied ideals, interests and motives of the New Testa- 
ment in the service of a supreme end. If so, what is the 
nature of that unity ? It has already become abundantly 
evident that there is in the writings themselves no ready- 
made or mechanical unity. This question will come before 
us again in another form. Here we only note that once 
more the New Testament leaves us face to face with a 
great demand. Out of its varied material we must get 
a clear picture of what the one Christian Gospel was 
at first, and of the manner in which it was in very varied 
forms and degrees incorporated in the life of the first 
century. It leaves us also with the imperative task of 
showing that that Gospel or one Christian end still remains 
the living Gospel for our time and needs. It leaves us 
also with the task of actually applying that Gospel to 
the details of our personal and social life to-day. It is 
our business, that is, to show that the practical acknow- 
ledgment of the redeeming God in Christ does solve for 
us the problems of life and the world. 

For Books see Chapter V. 



CHAPTER V 

THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

1. Introductory. Two Series of Questions Historical Documents and 

Modern Needs Application of the Gospel Essential. 

2. Modern Valuation of New Testament in Detail. The Resurrection, 

its Forms and Meaning in the New Testament Its Educational 
Problems Modern Substitutes Heaven and Hell. 

3. ' Translation ' of New Testament for Modern Use. The Universal 

Language of the New Testament Terms and Ideas almost 
Impossible to ' Translate ' Paul and Jesus in Modern Educa- 
tion Descriptions of Jesus Homiletic v. Scientific Exegesis. 

4. Limitations to the Modern Use of the New Testament. Three Examples 

The New Testament and a System of Ideals Need of Con- 
sistent Teaching Unity of New Testament in the Personality 
of Jesus No Systematic Analysis of His Values Hence In- 
evitable Variety of Interpretation. 

5. The Teacher's Knowledge of the Modern World. The Teacher and 

Human Nature The New Testament and its World Study of 
Modern Men and their Conditions. 

6. The Modern Application of the Gospel. The Real Task of the 

Teacher The Gaps in the New Testament The Church and the 
World. 

7. The Social Contribution of the New Testament. The Social Message 

of the New Testament Its Spirit, Attitude and Principles 
The Demand of the New Testament. 



INTRODUCTORY 

So far our treatment of the New Testament, from an 
educational point of view, has been concerned, on the one 
hand, with an historical study of its material as it met 
the needs of its own time and its first readers, providing 
them with the Christian ideal in many varied forms and 



8o THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

aspects, and with whatever helps and motive-power they 
seemed to need in their actual situation in order to move 
in its direction. On the other hand, a general valuation 
of its content and form has been suggested which revealed 
its fundamental features and qualities for the purpose 
of educative instruction, and which also emphasized in 
particular its peculiar adaptability to the needs, capacities 
and interests of Adolescence. 

In order, however, to apply the material thus collected 
and the views thus suggested in the practical teaching 
of the New Testament, the modern educator must be 
prepared to carry the discussion one or two steps further. 
The issues of education are, after all, the living issues of 
the present and the future, and however fitted the New 
Testament may have been to supply the moral and religious 
educational needs of its own time and people, and however 
adapted its type of material in general may be for the 
human adolescent, it does not necessarily follow that all 
its ideas, ideals, motives and helps have the same value 
for the twentieth century as they had for the first. Nor 
does it follow that because the New Testament is fitted 
to supply the general and universal needs of youth, it 
is also capable of solving all the particular and special 
problems of the youth of the twentieth century in their 
peculiar modern forms personal and social. 

Two SERIES OF QUESTIONS 

The fact is, as we have seen, that the New Testament 
comes to the teacher every time with a gift in one hand 
and a demand in the other. If it shows us the first great 
attempt to interpret and apply the Christian Gospel to a 
definite historical set of circumstances, it is at the same 
time and by its very nature a call upon us to face the 
inevitable question as to how this material is fitted to do 
the same work for our time. We must find out how far 
it will be effective for the Christian teacher to put our 
Christian experience, our Christian ideal and our appeal 
on its behalf into the forms and terms of the New 
Testament. 

Before he can use the New Testament, ^therefore, with 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 81 

any confidence, the teacher must ask himself these two 
series of questions : 

(a) Have the particular events, ideas, books and 
personalities of the New Testament the same moral 
educational value to-day as they had in the first century ? 
Can they be used as confidently in the same way and for 
the same purpose ? Can they be used in the same form ? 
If not, how much of what we may call ' translation ' do 
they need in order to make them effective for our modern 
purposes ? 

(b) Does the New Testament as a whole supply us 
with all the material that we need in order to present a 
satisfactory and adequate moral and religious ideal in a 
satisfactory form, with adequate motive-power for en- 
forcing it and with satisfactory guidance for applying it 
in and through the circumstances of our time ? Or are 
there any important gaps and defects in the New Testa- 
ment material from this point of view ? In other words, 
what exactly are the limitations to the value and use of 
the New Testament for modern life ? 

Here, of course, nothing like a full discussion of such 
questions can even be attempted, and we must be satis- 
fied with suggesting the various kinds of problems they 
involve. Two preliminary observations will help us to 
approach them in the right way and the right spirit. 






THE NEW TESTAMENT AND MODERN NEEDS 

i. A great deal depends upon whether we begin the 
discussion from the New Testament end, or from our 
experience of the actual needs of the present day. Some- 
thing may be said for both methods. On the one hand, 
in moral and religious instruction (as is the case also 
with regard to secular instruction) we have entered into 
a long historical tradition which gives the Bible the 
central, if not an all-sufficing, place in the curriculum. 
On the other hand, both religion and education, we 
repeat, are nothing if they are not answers to actual 
living needs. To provide these answers effectively, we 
must in the end be free to choose as our educational 
6 



82 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

material the very best the world can offer in the Bible 
or out of it. 

Occasionally these two points of view might naturally 
give us a different vision, but after our preliminary general 
valuation of the New Testament we may be justified 
in thinking that it is possible in the end to do justice to 
both at the same time. There must, however, be the 
constant reservation that where actual and imperative 
human need does come into serious conflict with the 
Biblical tradition, or with the New Testament itself, the 
latter must inevitably give way. 

THE PRACTICAL APPLICATION ESSENTIAL TO THE 
GOSPEL 

2. Another preliminary observation that must be 
made is that what we have in the material of the New 
Testament is not Christian principle or Christian ideal or 
Christian motive-power pure and simple that is, in a 
permanent and universal form but these always in some 
temporary historical form. Sometimes there may be 
an admixture of foreign sub-Christian or non-Christian 
elements ; and always the principle, ideal or motive 
is found in a form applicable to the need of the first 
century, and so more or less clothed in a first-century 
garb. 

Our definite task as teachers of the New Testament, 
therefore, is to strip the Christian Gospel, wherever that 
may be necessary, of its original historical garments and 
redress it in those of our own time. In every case what we 
must ask is, Does this New Testament idea, ideal or motive 
require any special adjustment to the language or needs 
or interests of our modern men, women or children ? For 
instance, a principle which we have succeeded in picking 
out of the circumstances of the New Testament may in 
itself be available or adequate for our use, but the special 
application made of it to some actual situation in the New 
Testament may be more or less out of date or useless. 
Tiiat is the case with many of the concrete applications 
made by Paul in the first letter to the Corinthians (e.g. the 
meat offered to idols). Our duty as teachers then will be, 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 83 

as it were, to squeeze the moral principle out of the original 
situation and to find some way of reapplying it to the 
new situation actually before us. 

It needs to be emphasized that this whole process of 
application and reapplication is necessary to the Gospel 
and to our teaching. Because we can and do distinguish 
between the essential Christian Gospel and its variable 
practical consequences, we are sometimes tempted to 
think that we can and ought to confine our preaching 
and instruction to this essence. But the application 
itself, though it may vary from age to age, and even from 
person to person, is also absolutely necessary to the life 
and growth of the Gospel. We never actually find the 
pure or simple Gospel except in and through some definite 
application of its principle. The application we need, 
however, can seldom if ever be a mere transference of the 
New Testament application to our time. That is why, 
consciously or unconsciously, we must always carry 
through the complete process of unclothing the Gospel 
of its first-century dress and then reclothe it in new 
garments in every age. 

2 

THE MODERN VALUATION OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

With this introduction we proceed to the discussion 
of our two series of questions. 

The first series involves two somewhat different kinds 
of educational problems. One is concerned with the 
modern valuation of each particular incident, idea, ideal, 
motive, book and personality of the New Testament for 
educational purposes ; while the other discusses the 
amount of ' translation ' they may need in form and 
expression in order that that value may become effective 
in instruction. 

THE RESURRECTION IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 

Take, for instance, the belief in the Resurrection as 
it is found in the New Testament. It is evident that this 



84 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

belief had a very significant value for Primitive Christi- 
anity. It is one of the main forms in which the early 
Christians expressed the Christian ideal, and it is also 
used extensively, both as motive and consolation, by 
their teachers. The Resurrection of Jesus especially was 
the occasion if not the cause of the rapid spread of Christi- 
anity ; and early Christian teaching and preaching was 
largely based upon it in some form or other. It certainly 
made a very strong and effective appeal to the men of the 
first century. 

The question we now definitely raise is, What is its 
value and place in the spread of the Christian Gospel or 
the growth of Christian character to-day ? Can we appeal 
to it in the same form, for the same purpose and with the 
same effect as the first Christian teachers and preachers 
did ? Will it appeal in the same form to children of ten 
as it will to youths of eighteen, or women of thirty, or men 
of fifty ? 

If we come to the conclusion, as every Christian teacher 
probably will, that the essential faith in the reality of the 
eternal life and its conquest over death a faith which 
does lie behind the belief in the Resurrection still re- 
presents one of the significant values we desire to pre- 
serve and increase, we are still left with the further 
problem of finding the most fitting and effective form 
through which to create and stimulate that faith. 

EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS INVOLVED 

The faith is found in many different forms in the New 
Testament. Now it is the empty tomb of Jesus ; now 
His bodily resurrection ; now it is expressed in visions 
of the Risen Jesus and now in the ' spiritual body ' of 
Paul. Now it is a part of the eschatological drama of the 
end, and so a future hope ; and again it is the ' eternal life ' 
of John, and so a present spiritual reality. Now it is the 
moral impression made by the character and personality 
of Jesus, and then the present influence of the Holy Spirit 
is its earnest and pledge. There are also other different 
expressions of what is essentially the same faith. 

Are all of these forms of equal value to us to-day ? 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 85 

Is there any reason to think that we can use one of them 
more effectively in the case of children, another for youth, 
and another still for maturity and old age ? Do any or 
all of them require some amount of ' translation ' in order to 
make them available and effective as appeals in our day ? 
Some of the New Testament forms are certainly more 
' sympathetic ' to modern ideas and language than others. 
Is that any sufficient reason for making a larger use of 
them in instruction, or have we more real need of other 
forms more foreign to our pet ideas ? We must remember 
that our purpose is not to pander to fugitive modern 
whims, but to serve the Christian Gospel in order to satisfy 
legitimate modern needs in distinction from passing 
modern wants. Must we, for instance, eliminate the 
eschatological drama of the Resurrection, or can we 
preserve its essential value by translating it into some 
other more or less eschatological form of belief more 
consonant with our modern view of the world ? How far 
are we justified in using the term Resurrection at all if 
we do not use it in its New Testament sense of the soul 
rising again from Sheol ? 

MODERN SUBSTITUTES 

We cannot stop even here with our questioning. Can 
we find what we need for conserving the essential faith 
in a life after death in any of the New Testament forms of 
belief in the Resurrection, whether translated into modern 
terms or not ? Shall we be forced in the end to search 
for some quite other form and expression as a means of 
conserving this value ? For instance, shall we depend 
more upon the spread of an ethical interpretation of the 
universe or upon a deepened conviction of the infinite 
value of man and the individual as many modern 
philosophers seem to suggest ? Or shall we walk in the 
ways of Positivism and trust in an immortal humanity ? 
Shall we search for our panacea in the darkening by- 
paths of Theosophy or Spiritism, or shall we even trust 
the vicarious deaths of the battlefield to open the im- 
mortal doors before us as many orthodox popular preachers 
seem inclined to do ? 



86 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

From this long cross-examination it will be seen that 
we are ultimately thrown among the most living moral 
and religious educational issues, and the need of a deliberate 
and careful study of this kind is becoming more and more 
imperative every day. 

THE ESCHATOLOGY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

Such a discussion of the Resurrection would lead 
almost inevitably to the wider question of the whole 
Eschatology of the New Testament with its Parousia, 
Judgment, Heaven and Hell. At present the educational 
situation with regard to these is that they have either 
disappeared altogether from our instruction or they 
retain merely a formal place in it because they are in the 
New Testament, which by our ordinary methods cannot 
be taught without them. The belief, however, is growing 
that these eschatological pictures do, in their own way, 
represent some intrinsic or instrumental values in the 
moral and religious life, well worth conserving for future 
generations. Having, however, practically eliminated the 
New Testament forms of these values, we have not yet 
found, nor even seriously tried to find, some satisfactory 
substitute for them. In attempting to ' translate ' such 
motives as the eschatological Heaven and Hell or in 
searching for satisfactory substitutes, it will probably be 
necessary often to remind ourselves that our need is two- 
fold. We must, that is, see to it that the means we employ 
are not only such as can get a sure grip upon the actual 
people we are dealing with, but are also consistent with 
the moral and spiritual end for which we are working. 
They must be in and for themselves in some way good and 
Christian as well as effective. 



3 
1 TRANSLATION ' OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 



This may serve as a more or less typical example of 
the kind of study that is meant when we speak of a modern 






THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 87 

educational valuation and ' translation ' of the New 
Testament material in detail. 

The Christian teacher is in urgent need of a systematic 
discussion on these lines with regard to all the forms and 
expressions given to the ideals and motives, ends and 
means, ideas and events, books and personalities which 
make up the New Testament and early Christianity. 

In going over the contents of the New Testament with 
such questions as the above in our minds, we shall prob- 
ably find a call for almost all degrees of ' translation ' 
from the mere translation of the words to a radical trans- 
formation of the thought in order to make the New 
Testament real and effective in our day. 

THE UNIVERSAL LANGUAGE OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

Such expressions as ' Our Father/ ' God is Love/ ' The 
pure in heart shall see God/ and many other expressions 
which belong to the heart and soul of the New Testament 
need no translation at all. They speak the universal, 
direct and simple language of the human heart and experi- 
ence. The only strange thing to us in them is the original 
language in which they were spoken. 

At the other extreme, however, such expressions as 
1 the man of sin ' or ' Antichrist ' will naturally stand 
at the bottom of our scale of values and require a very 
radical transformation before they can be used at all with 
any effect in our moral and religious instruction. To 
translate them into modern forms and modern terms is 
almost impossible even if it were worth the energy and 
time spent upon the task. 

In between these two extremes, almost all degrees of 
adaptation will be required to make the New Testament 
material educationally effective. Jesus, for instance, in 
His teaching, life, character and personality, is not only 
much more primary and central for early Christianity 
than Paul, but also requires very much less ' translation ' 
to make him the most effective and the indispensable 
element in the moral and religious education of modern 
youth. In fact, the only serious difficulty in this respect, 



88 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

so far as the main body of the Synoptic presentation is 
concerned, springs from the Messianic idea in its Jewish 
eschatological form. 

JESUS IN EDUCATION 

There are, however, numerous presentations and 
descriptions of Jesus in the New Testament which provide 
a good example of the very various degrees of relativity 
to the first century to be observed in the ideas of the New 
Testament. He is Jesus, Master, Teacher, Shepherd, 
Bishop, Prophet, Priest, King, Judge, Lord, Saviour, 
Redeemer, Mediator, Christ, Son of David, Son of Man, 
Son of God, Lamb of God, Last Adam, Only-begotten Son 
and the Word of God. Some of these are universally 
intelligible and at the same time represent the supreme 
values, which were revealed in Jesus, both for the first 
century and for all ages. They therefore have peculiar 
educative power. Some stand much further away from 
the main spiritual values revealed in Jesus and also 
require a far more complicated process of interpretation 
and translation to make them intelligible for modern 
man and effective for educational purposes. Sometimes, 
also, owing to our familiarity with the language of the 
New Testament and the apparent simplicity of the terms 
themselves, some of the above descriptions seem to be 
much more intelligible than they really are. To most 
modern readers, such a title as ' The Son of Man ' is really 
only an empty phrase so far as the appreciation of its 
characteristic meaning in the New Testament is con- 
cerned. Usually, indeed, the meaning associated with it 
(namely, as emphasizing the humanity of Jesus) is far 
removed from its original use in Judaism and the 
Gospels. 

So much is this the case with regard to some of the 
most familiar sayings in the New Testament that the 
question must often arise whether it would not be better 
for general educational purposes to rest content with a 
conventional and traditional interpretation rather than 
attempt laboriously to make intelligible to the modern 
reader their more exact and historical meaning in the 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 89 

New Testament itself. An example may make clear the 
dilemma. 



HOMILETIC AND SCIENTIFIC EXEGESIS 

" For God so loved the world," says the Fourth Gospel, 
" that He gave His Only-begotten Son, that whosoever 
believeth in Him should not perish, but have everlasting 
life." Most of those who are very familiar with these 
words interpret them as the simplest, completest and 
most directly religious and evangelical description of 
the meaning of Christianity to be found in the New 
Testament. That, in a way, is quite true. This actually 
does underlie the saying, but the popular interpretation 
almost entirely disregards the typically Johannine meaning 
and atmosphere of almost every word in the passage. 
' World,' ' gave,' ' Only-begotten,' ' believeth in Him,' 
1 perish ' and ' everlasting life ' all represent peculiarly 
Johannine thoughts theological and metaphysical which 
overlay, as in a palimpsest, the simpler, direct expression 
of Christian experience. Whether, however, it would be 
worth while attempting to rescue that exact Johannine 
articulation of the Gospel in this case for any but technical 
students, is very doubtful. It would depend partly upon 
the view taken of the comparative value for the general 
moral and religious life and progress of the two following 
factors which are involved. 

On the one hand, it is undoubtedly a great educational 
gain to have imprinted upon the mind of youth such brief 
and compact symbolic representations which are inter- 
preted as clearly summarizing in a simple way the supreme 
values of Christian experience. On the other hand, the 
divorce of the educational or the homiletic use of Biblical 
sayings from scientific and historical accuracy of exegesis 
must, in the long run, exert an evil influence upon the 
health and progress of the moral and religious life. 

In this case, very probably the positive gain would 
outweigh the loss because the aim of both the traditional 
interpretation and the Johannine writer was one and 
the same, and therefore the divorce between scientific 
accuracy and homiletic use is not in this case as complete 



go THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

as it often is. Generally speaking, however, it is the 
duty of the Christian teacher to avoid and to discourage 
this kind of dualism in his teaching so far as possible. 
It has been an evil influence both in the pulpit and the 
Sunday School. 

4 
THE LIMITATIONS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

Such a conclusion, however, brings us into the very 
midst of the second series of questions which we must 
face as soon as we begin to make practical use of the 
material of the New Testament for the purposes of moral 
and religious education. 

These questions were concerned, it will be remembered, 
not with particular valuations of the various items of 
the New Testament material, but with the character and 
range of that material as a whole. In effect, we have to 
ask how far the New Testament provides us with all that 
we need as modern teachers for our instruction even in 
so far as it concerns only the presentation and the applica- 
tion of the Christian Gospel. The effectiveness of the 
use we make of the New Testament depends upon a 
definite consciousness, not only of the positive help which 
it is capable of bringing and does bring to our instruction, 
but also of what it does not and cannot contribute to 
our need. 

TYPICAL EXAMPLES OF ITS LIMITATION 

Valuable and even indispensable as is the New Testa- 
ment for the modern Christian teacher, there are evidently 
some very definite limits to the help that it can bring 
him. There are still some very important needs that it 
cannot satisfy and cannot be expected to satisfy. The 
teacher and preacher must look elsewhere for some things 
that are absolutely necessary for the moral and religious 
instruction of our day. Indeed, as we have seen, the 
very help that the New Testament brings is conditional 
upon that help being supplemented from other sources. 






THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 91 

Here, we must be content with giving three examples 
of what we may call this inherent inability of the New 
Testament to supply in full what we need. All three 
are necessary consequences of the historical and practical 
character of the New Testament the limitations imposed 
upon it by its very nature. Historical documents in- 
tended definitely for their own age must necessarily be 
limited in their horizon both as regards time and range 
of subjects. The New Testament, therefore, just because 
it met the specific needs and took upon it the specific 
forms of the first century, cannot ( i ) give us in any prepared 
form such a system of moral ideals based on the Gospel 
as we need to meet the specific needs of the twentieth 
century ; nor (2) give us that knowledge which, as teachers, 
we must have of those specific needs and forms of life them- 
selves ; nor (3) can it give us any direct and full guidance 
as to the best means of enforcing our ideals. Especially, 
it cannot directly show us how the Gospel may be united 
with those features of modern life which were not within 
the range of the first Christian teachers and preachers. 
These limitations we will proceed to discuss in this 
order. 



THE NEW TESTAMENT AND A SYSTEM OF VALUES 

With regard to the first, one of the imperative con- 
ditions of any permanently effective teaching ministry 
is that the teacher or preacher should be in possession 
of some fairly unified system of thought and life as a 
general background for every sermon and every lesson. 
This need not of necessity be a technical system of 
theological doctrines, but it must include, at any rate, 
a fairly consistent view of the ideal or some system of 
ideals for which he is working, some consistent system of 
motives with which to enforce those ideals, and some 
consistent system of practical helps towards living them. 
Every sermon and every lesson may make some definite 
and special impression of its own, but there should be 
certainly a cumulative and consistent impression from 
lesson to lesson and from sermon to sermon. Indeed, 
permanent impressions on mind and heart and will, 



92 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

that is, on the character, are generally cumulative in 
their nature and not instantaneous. A single lesson or a 
single sermon may and sometimes does achieve great 
temporary success by arousing some expulsive emotion, 
or by creating an impulse which can immediately find 
expression, but it is a slowly growing accumulation of 
impressions that usually exercises permanent control 
over life. For this it is essential that the hearer or scholar 
should feel that the different impressions he gets, one 
after another, all belong together somehow, and that he 
should be progressively introduced through them into 
the same world of feeling, thought, experience and life. 

THE CONSISTENCY OF THE TEACHER 

It is probably impossible for any one who has to be 
constantly preaching sermons or giving instruction never 
to give expression to opinions that are inconsistent ; but 
in order to be permanently effective, teaching must be 
consistent enough in the ideals presented and in the 
motives to which appeal is made to make some unified 
general impression upon those who listen to it. 

To describe the ideal to-day as obedience to the 
absolute laws of the world and God, and to-morrow 
as the life of freedom ; now as life in the Holy Spirit, 
and then as union with Christ ; to-day as communion 
with God, and to-morrow as love and service of men 
this must become a source of bewilderment rather than 
of education if no attempt is made to bring all the descrip- 
tions into some sort of relation to one another as parts 
of one definite system of life and thought. 

We may talk of reconstruction as much as we like, 
but it will never come to anything worth bothering about, 
unless behind it there are some dominating moral and 
spiritual convictions spreading their light and power 
over the whole realm of life. A world that is full of a 
myriad different plans but bankrupt in ideals, conviction 
and faith will only gravitate back to the old rut once 
more, and with added impetus in the end. 

Whether we can in reality teach the New Testament 
or not depends largely upon whether we can get out of 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 93 

it such a system of ideals and motives as will satisfy 
the deepest needs of the world. 



UNITY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT IN JESUS 

Here, certainly, the New Testament comes a long way 
at least towards satisfying the need of the Christian 
teacher and yet not by any means all the way. He will 
find in the New Testament certainly different strata of 
life, different levels of living, but amidst all the varied 
elements in these writings he can still recognize the really 
distinct spirit and life contributed to the world by the 
Christian movement embodied in man} 7 different forms. 

It is only in personality that this spirit of life can be 
fully and adequately expressed. The unity that is behind 
and in the New Testament is a living unity. It is a spiritual 
unity in the full sense of that term. Jesus Himself is 
the Gospel of the New Testament because He is incalcul- 
ably the purest, simplest, most direct and fullest expression 
of its spirit and life. 

SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE VALUES ' IN JESUS 

He remains and will remain the Gospel and its standard 
incorporation unless and until there is revealed in the 
history of mankind a life of higher and fuller spiritual 
values than His, bringing with it a stronger moral dynamic 
and expressing itself in fresher, more direct and more 
universal forms. If and when that comes we shall surely 
know it, but at present it is beyond even our imagination. 

Yet, just because our Gospel still comes to us in, 
through and as an historical personality, the modern 
teacher is reminded that its ideal life, as it is found even 
in Jesus Himself, is cast in the mould of the first and not 
of the twentieth century. It must, therefore, remain 
his task to show that for our time and conditions, Jesus 
does reveal a consistent system of ideals or values ' worthy 
of all acceptation.' The New Testament does not under- 
take that task for him. There is nowhere in it any 
systematic analysis of Jesus, nor any attempt to make 
a scale or system of the moral and spiritual values incarnate 



94 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

and revealed in Him. Out of Jesus, we must get it by a 
progressive interpretation led by one or other of the 
supreme categories found for Him by New Testament 
writers, or led by some other adequate category created 
by His influence upon the thought of man since the time 
of the New Testament. 

That is why, so long as Jesus thus remains the highest 
J life incarnate in history, it is the duty and the right of 
every generation (and even of every disciple) to reinterpret 
and to revalue Him for every new age and situation to 
make, that is, its own analysis and application of the 
spiritual values embodied in Him for the satisfaction of 
the needs of its own life. 

THE INEVITABLE VARIETY OF INTERPRETATION 

The variety of interpretations is inevitable until we 
shall have found the one adequate category that can 
hold together all His values. So far, all the different 
historical interpretations of Jesus fall into a few fairly 
well-defined types, and every well-equipped teacher will 
soon find in one variation or other of them his own 
personal interpretation, which ought to and will inevitably 
become the background, content and end of all his teaching. 



THE TEACHER'S KNOWLEDGE OF THE MODERN 

WORLD 

The second necessary limitation in the help to be 
expected from the New Testament concerns the know- 
ledge which every competent teacher must have of his 
own age and time its men, women and children, and 
their actual conditions and special needs. It is, of course, 
the actual and varied needs of man, personal and social, 
that provide the first justification for the existence of 
the teacher. It is a realization of those needs that gives 
him and his calling a real place in the economy of life. 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 95 

THE TEACHER AND HUMAN NATURE 

One of his main qualifications is an effective know- 
ledge of the personal and social life as it actually is in 
the men, women and children whom he sets out to teach, 
their best and their worst, their virtues and their vices, 
what is difficult and what is easy for them to do, their 
triumphs and their defeats, their joys and their sorrows, 
their temptations and their trials. 

How far can and does the New Testament help him 
to obtain possession of such knowledge ? 

It is, of course, true that there are deep abiding 
features in human nature, and that there are human 
needs fundamentally the same in all ages. The Christian 
Gospel is intended to meet those needs. That is why 
it may be the Gospel for the twentieth as for the first 
century. It is also quite as true that though man is thus 
always the same, men and the conditions of life are always 
changing. That is why the forms of the Gospel, as well 
as the teaching and preaching of the Gospel, must be 
different for different men and times. It is only by meeting 
the changes in men and conditions that the permanence 
of the Gospel can be vindicated. 



THE WORLD OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

So, by emphasizing the fact that each writing of the 
New Testament was deliberate teaching for its own time 
and conditions, and was always in touch with those con- 
ditions, the inference is made inevitable that if we wish 
to teach and to preach in the spirit, and on the lines of 
the New Testament, it must be teaching and preaching 
for the twentieth century and always in touch with its 
specific conditions. 

On the other hand, by revealing the actual conditions 
of the first century in the Roman Empire, the modern 
study of the New Testament has also incidentally shown 
us how different in many respects they were from ours. 
It has, therefore, made plain the gap that must be filled 
by the teacher if he wishes to present and apply the 
Christian Gospel effectively to his own time. He cannot 



g6 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

find the point of contact for his Gospel simply in the 
New Testament, but is driven by the call of the New 
Testament itself to a study of his own age, both from a 
psychological and a sociological point of view. 

It is plain that the New Testament cannot itself give 
him this knowledge. It can only compel him to face 
the absolute need for such a knowledge. 

The study to which the teacher is thus driven is of 
two kinds. First of all, it is a study of universal human 
nature ; and, secondly, of the particular human nature of 
our modern world, of our own country and of our own 
pupils. With regard to the former, which will always 
remain the more important, a careful study of the New 
Testament can still help us very considerably. Our 
attention has already been directed to what we may call 
the human nature of the New Testament the fact that 
it is a human product and a real part of the human world. 
Simply to read it from that point of view is a great lesson 
in the knowledge of man, of universal human nature. 
It is a unique revelation of the human heart. Its inter- 
pretation and exegesis are becoming more and more 
psychological in character, with its emphasis upon ex- 
perience and personality rather than upon doctrine. 

STUDY OF MODERN MEN AND CONDITIONS 

All this, however, will not take us very far in reading 
and understanding the signs of our time. For that we 
must depend ultimately upon our own contact with our 
own world with the actual conditions of the world into 
which the Gospel must be inserted its personal and 
social problems, its education and its politics, its economic 
interdependence and rivalries, its labour questions and 
its international difficulties, its alienation from the Church 
and its poor substitutes for religion, its intellectual chaos 
and moral helplessness all the features that help to 
distinguish it from every other age in history. 

The time is surely coming, if it has not already come, 
when men who have been overwhelmed in this welter 
will begin to read the New Testament with a new anxiety 
to find out the help it can give them in meeting the 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 97 

problems personal and social which they have utterly 
failed to solve without it. There is some danger that their 
search may lead to disappointment at first, because they 
will be apt to expect a great deal more than the New 
Testament can possibly provide for their guidance. It is 
only teachers who know both the age and the New Testa- 
ment from the inside sympathetically, that can so mould 
and moderate their expectations and also bring to the fore 
their deepest needs in such a way as to enforce the Gospel 
in their lives. 



THE MODERN APPLICATION OF THE GOSPEL 

Once we do know something of the age in which we 
live, with its urgent needs, problems and interests, we 
find ourselves still facing a task which the New Testa- 
ment by itself cannot help us adequately to perform. 

THE REAL TASK OF THE TEACHER 

The third condition of effective teaching is a knowledge 
of ways and means whereby the actual life lived by men 
can be transformed progressively in the direction of the 
ideal. The task of the teacher is to bring to bear upon 
his scholars such various influences as have this trans- 
forming power. To know these means and to be able 
to use them well is the real original work of the teacher. 
The ideal in its essence is already there, given in the 
Gospel. The actual conditions which must somehow be 
adjusted to it are facing him all the time. These are, in a 
sense, the fixed points between which he moves. His real 
business is to find the power and use the proper means 
in order to change the actual into the ideal. 

All the world is open to him in his search for these. He 
can appeal to all the motives that move men, the hopes 
that do actually inspire them, the fears that haunt them, 
family instincts and national sentiments, self-respect and 
love and loyalty all these and many more, in addition to 
the sheer attractive power of the ideal itself, are at his 
7 



g8 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

service so long as he remembers that he is a teacher of 
the Christian Gospel, and that therefore his means as well 
as his ends must be Christian in their character or at 
least consistent with or capable of serving Christian ends. 
Here, again, the New Testament comes a long way to 
meet him, but leaves him also long before he reaches the 
end of his journey. It does offer him such a wealth and 
variety of material of the kind he needs as to be almost 
embarrassing, and it shows him that material as it was 
actually used for the general purpose he has in view. In 
it almost every chord in the human heart is struck and 
struck again in order to move men towards Christ. But 
here, again, once more we are warned that what we have 
in the New Testament from this point of view is an 
unclassified record almost a bewildering chaos of the 
motives and means used by first-century preachers to meet 
the needs of first-century men and to influence them in 
the direction of the Gospel. The New Testament cannot 
help us to decide whether any or all of these means will 
effect the same purpose to-day. For that kind of help 
the teacher must look outside the New Testament and 
himself become responsible for the result. For permanent 
influence, as we have seen, some kind of consistency 
in his appeals he must have, for it will be futile for him to 
threaten the same people with hell one day and the next 
day rely upon the sheer moral and spiritual power of love 
to lead them. Indirectly, of course, and especially so far 
as the personal life of men is concerned, the guidance of 
the New Testament still stands absolutely unique in this 
respect. 

THE GAPS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 

There is, however, a far more serious limitation to the 
guidance provided for the modern teacher by the New 
Testament in attempting to find effective means of apply- 
ing the Christian Gospel to modern life as well as to the 
range of material offered to him in the New Testament for 
that purpose. 

The more specifically modern problems are almost all 
social, and the most critical challenge which Christianity 









THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 99 

and the Christian Gospel have to meet is primarily neither 
personal nor intellectual but social. It is a challenge to 
apply the Gospel practically to the growth of social life 
in all its forms. And it is here that historical Christi- 
anity and the New Testament leave the Christian teacher 
to all appearance in the lurch. On the surface, at any 
rate, there are large gaps here in the teaching of the 
New Testament. The main modern social problems do 
not seem to have been within the horizon of the first 
missionaries of the Gospel. At any rate, they do not 
seem to have made any definite attempts to apply the 
Gospel in these regions. 

Is there here really a gap in the Gospel itself, as some 
have held, or is this comparative absence of contact with 
social problems only another illustration of the way in 
which the first Christian teachers kept close to the actual 
problems before them ? Can the Christian Gospel be 
brought into any vital and effective contact with these 
significant elements in our age ? Is there any real room 
for them in the life of the Gospel, or must we say that it is 
so far incomplete and requires the prophetic ministry of a 
Luther, for instance, to complete it ? Here we have one 
of the main tests at present applied to the New Testament. 

THE CHURCH AND THE WORLD 

It is useless to think that as Christian teachers we can 
in any way evade the issue. We must either moderate 
our claims upon men or we must go forward with much 
more enterprise to the task of showing that there can be, 
and ought to be, a Christian society, Christian education, 
Christian politics, Christian industry and Christian inter- 
national relations. The world is waiting to hear some- 
thing more from the Church than a proclamation of 
principles or protests against evils, although even here the 
Church has lamentably failed in its duty in recent years. 
No progress, however, can be made with regard to social 
reconstruction in any direction until Christian teachers 
can give some positive guidance based on the principles 
of the Gospel and knowledge of the facts of the situation. 
It is evading the issue to say that we do not know enough 



ioo THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

about educational, political, industrial and international 
conditions to do what is required. It is our business co- 
operatively or personally to get the requisite knowledge 
or to see that those who have the knowledge use it in the 
service of the Gospel. The least that we can do is deliber- 
ately to set ourselves to train a new generation that will 
be more capable than we are of applying the Christian 
Gospel to the social situation. 



THE SOCIAL CONTRIBUTION OF THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

It is not our task here to discuss this issue as a whole. 
What we are mainly concerned with is to call attention to 
the character and range of the contribution of the New 
Testament to its solution. That must be indeed one of 
the first steps towards adopting the proper Christian 
attitude. Does the New Testament give us any help 
at all to meet the social situation ? If so, exactly what 
kind of help ? Does it reveal to us the spirit in which 
men should live their social life ? Can it give us also the 
principles in accordance with which social life should be 
organized and its problems solved ? Does it provide us 
with anything that can be called a Christian programme 
in these matters ? Is it our only resource to fall back 
upon the fundamental nature of the Gospel itself and on 
our own responsibility to apply it in what seems to us 
the right way ? If the New Testament cannot give us 
sufficient guidance to apply the Gospel in detail to all 
departments of social life, then we must seek it elsewhere. 
It is our first duty, however, to find out exactly how far 
the New Testament is capable of taking us, and there is 
urgent need of intelligent instruction on the point. 

THE SOCIAL MESSAGE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

To what extent and on what matters is the Christian 
disciple pledged in his social attitude and activities, and 
where does his liberty of opinion begin ? 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 101 

It is evident that there is no such thing as a practical 
social programme in the New Testament. That is part of 
its natural and inevitable limitation. It does not and 
cannot do our thinking and our organizing for us. It is 
evident also that its primary interest is not in institutions 
and organizations but in men, and first of all in individual 
men. It is to individuals that it makes its first appeal, 
and it is through individuals that it works. 

If Jesus, however, is the incorporation of our Gospel, 
then His disciples and His Church are pledged to a per- 
sonality intensely social in spirit, to a very comprehensive 
conception of Christian service and salvation, to certain 
broad social principles and convictions, in the light of 
which that service must be given, and to an intelligent 
and persistent attempt to apply that spirit and those 
principles specifically to the social circumstances of their 
time and generation. One may also be justified in adding 
that there are certain tasks and duties imposed upon a 
Christian people by the very nature of the Gospel itself 
such tasks, for instance, as the cure of poverty and the 
elimination of disease. We must also realize very keenly 
before we finish reading the New Testament that the 
Kingdom of God cannot be established by organization, 
nor simply by the reform of laws and institutions. The 
present high estimation of outward civilization in general 
and of luxury in particular seems incompatible with the 
spirit of Jesus, and where wealth is owned at all such 
ownership is evangelically permissible only when it is 
accompanied by a vivid consciousness of its immense 
obligations. 



ITS SPIRIT, ATTITUDE AND PRINCIPLES 

" It has been aptly said that ' Christ views social 
phenomena from above, in the light of His religious 
vocation. He approaches them from within through the 
development of personality. He judges them from their 
end, as contributing to the Kingdom of God.' Four 
great principles stand out clearly from His teaching. 
God is our Father and all men are our brethren. The 
Kingdom of God is at hand. Life is the measure of 



102 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

true value. All disciples are stewards. While in some 
passages a sudden apocalyptic coming of our Lord is sug- 
gested, His teaching involves, at least as often, a regenera- 
tion of human society here and now through the working of 
the law of righteousness and love, and in the background 
of it stands the message of social righteousness delivered 
by the prophets of the Old Testament. God's Kingdom 
implies God's reign over the whole of human conduct and 
carries with it a fellowship among His subjects. There 
is to be a Christian society, a People of God, a Church, 
which shall be the light, the salt, the leaven of human 
life. But this Society is rather the means of realizing 
the Kingdom than the Kingdom itself. Life at its highest 
is the knowledge of God, but all human life comes within 
our Lord's purpose. Life itself is carefully distinguished 
from the material means of living ; the service of Mammon 
is typical of the spirit of the ' Kingdom of this age. 1 
Wealth is dangerous ; and detachment from preoccupa- 
tion with wealth is the first mark of the subjects of God's 
Kingdom." x 

THE DEMAND OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

So far the New Testament does actually take us and 
the Gospel for the sake of which the New Testament 
exists. It provides us, moreover, with numerous illustra- 
tions of the way in which the first teachers did actually 
apply their principles to the social as well as the personal 
problems of their day. It leaves us with the demand that 
we should in the same way answer to the call of our time. 
It does not and cannot tell us how to do it. When we 
want to know the relation of Bolshevism, Socialism, 
Capitalism, Strikes, War, Nationalism and a thousand 
other features of our time to the Christian Gospel ; when 
we have to apply the principles of the Gospel to the Church, 
Politics, Education, Industry, the State and any other 
forms of social organization, we shall not find the answers 
ready-made in the New Testament ; but it demands that 
we should search diligently for the answers for ourselves 
and act courageously on our own responsibility. On all 

1 Christianity and Industrial Problems, pp. 27-8. 



THE MODERN USE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 103 

these points there is urgent need of Christian solutions, and 
it is a definite part of the task of the Christian teacher to 
make full use of the New Testament for that purpose, 
taking it as far as ever it will go, and making clear the 
exact value of its contribution. 



BOOKS 

BAUMGARTEN (O.). Neue Bahnen. (Leipzig, 1903.^ Predigt-Prob- 

leme. (Tubingen, 1905.) 

MELLONE. The New Testament in Modern Life. (London, 1920.) 
NIEBERGALL (F.). Wie predigen wir dem modernen Menschen ? 

(Tubingen, 1906.) Praktische Auslegung des Neuen Testaments. 

(Tubingen, 1909.) 

SCOTT (E. F.). The Apologetic of the New Testament. (London, 1907.) 
WEISS (J.). Die Schriften des Neuen Testaments neu iibersetzt und 

fur die Gegenwart erkldr*. (Gottingen, 1906.) 



CHAPTER VI 

THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK 

1. New Tasks and Responsibilities. Summary of Previous Chapters 

The Changed Situation The Integrity of the Teacher His 
Sphere of Work Enlarged. 

2. The Teacher's Relation to the New Testament. Deliverance from the 

Tyranny of the Letter A Spiritual Relation The Personal Life 
of the Teacher. 

3. The Common Task of All Teachers. A Teaching Fellowship All 

Teachers engaged in making Men. 

4. Teaching the Christian Gospel. The Background and Content of 

the New Testament The Preparatory Work to be kept in its 
Place Finding the Soul and the Power of the New Testament 
The New Testament and the Gospel The Traditional Idea of 
the Gospel The Gospel in History. 

5. The Nature of the Christian Gospel. Faith in Christ and the Faith 

of Jesus Himself The Organic View of the Gospel and its Ex- 
pressions Intellectual Statements Necessary but Inadequate 
Teaching the Gospel means spreading the Spirit, Life and 
Principles of Jesus Methods and Agencies, Old and New 
A Campaign of Christian Education. 



NEW TASKS AND RESPONSIBILITIES 

WE have now described the main conditions under which 
the teacher of the New Testament must do his work 
the general guidance he can obtain from the principles 
and methods of modern education, and the character of 
the material with which he has to deal. 

We suggested the main lines on which an educational 
interpretation can be given to the New Testament as a 
whole and in detail. We have also attempted to define 

the value and place of the New Testament material in 

104 



THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK 105 

the process of education, to describe the extent and 
nature of its positive contribution, and to mark out the 
necessary limitations to its modern use as an educational 
instrument. 

Before passing on to discuss the particular problems 
involved in the task of teaching the New Testament, it 
may now be possible, in the light of the preceding dis- 
cussions, to indicate more definitely and more systematically 
than we have yet done the nature and meaning of that 
task, both in relation to the wider interests of education 
generally, and in its bearing upon the personal position 
and attitude of the teacher himself. 

Our literary, historical and educational interpretation 
of the New Testament at once places the Christian teacher 
in a position far freer and far more responsible than ever 
before. 

THE CHANGED SITUATION 

He must now appear before his pupils, and before all 
men, without shield or armour, as it were, taking nothing 
for granted but the actual facts and postulates of human 
life and human nature. There was a time when he could 
build confidently upon a certain theory of the Bible, to be 
accepted without discussion or proof. Now, the validity 
and value of what he has to say can depend only upon 
actual facts which can be tested by ordinary human 
methods in the same way as all other facts of a similar 
kind. He does not ask men to take what he says on blind, 
unreasoning trust to any greater extent than is done in 
other departments of human experience and knowledge. 
If any one likes to obtain the necessary qualifications 
he can test for himself everything that is said. It is 
deeper and deeper inquiry that is desired most of all. 
The teacher dare not shelter himself behind any dogmatic 
theory of the origin or authority of the Bible. He dare 
not hide behind the New Testament itself from the shafts 
and arrows of criticism. He must be ready to lay bare 
even the very foundations of life itself, and see whether 
they are well and truly laid. 



io6 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

THE INTEGRITY OF THE TEACHER 

This inevitably means harder work, greater responsi- 
bility and greater courage, but it means also the redemp- 
tion of the integrity of the teacher himself, both moral 
and intellectual. That, in itself, is one of the greatest of 
personal gains for him. 

There has been lurking in the minds of even naturally 
religious people a dark suspicion that the ordinary canons 
of thought and judgment have no validity in Christian 
teaching and preaching. The Sunday-school teacher, as 
well as the preacher, they say or think, has to preach 
and to teach what the Bible says, because it is in the 
Bible and not because it is really a positive truth for life 
in general or because he really believes what he says. 
The fundamental honesty and integrity of the ordinary 
preacher is widely and seriously doubted. Thorough 
intellectual integrity in the pulpit is a matter for surprise 
and bewilderment. The first thing which a public teacher 
of Christianity has to do in these days, if he wishes to get 
into living touch with men, is to redeem his moral and 
intellectual integrity at almost any cost. It is a much 
more valuable asset on the side of the Gospel than any 
success he may attain by means of his eloquence or his 
brilliancy. 

The modern criticism of the New Testament, it is 
true, cannot purchase his honesty for him, but by com- 
pelling him to throw away the artificial protection of a 
Bible, a quotation from which is supposed to establish 
any truth, it makes the redemption of his honesty possible 
and much easier. 



THE SPHERE OF HIS WORK ENLARGED 

The very thing, however, which enables the teacher 
to establish his honesty and integrity at the start also 
vastly enlarges the sphere of his work. The range of his 
teaching or preaching is inevitably widened. New tasks 
are laid upon him, and these mean new opportunities. 
Since he cannot now start by silently taking for granted 
that the New Testament is the last court of appeal and 



THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK 107 

that its written word is a final external authority, he is 
compelled to lay the foundations of his message deeper 
down and deal at first hand with the fundamental issues 
of life. That means a nearer approach to the universal 
human standpoint, more reality and more living contact 
with the actual facts of life. 

The Christian teacher must now show not only that 
there is a direct way from the Bible into life, but also 
from life itself into the New Testament. He must not 
only try to make the ideals of life conform to the truths 
of the New Testament, but also to test the statements 
of the New Testament by the facts of life. Indeed, the 
particular kind of teaching that is most needed in our 
time is the teaching that will make the New Testament 
once more a living book, a book by live men to living men. 
Even those who are closely identified with the Churches, 
as well as those who are outside them, stand in great 
need of this kind of teaching. It is only very rarely 
that the Christian teacher can take for granted in his 
pupils of all ages much knowledge of the contents, meaning 
and value of the New Testament. Generally the best 
that w r e find is a vague kind of more or less inherited 
belief in the supreme value of the ' Bible.' The people 
who hold such a belief are continually in need.of teaching 
that will clarify their ideas of the kind of value we have 
in the Bible, that will make them realize how the Bible 
has acquired that value, and how in detail it has sprung 
out of life. That means to say they are always in need 
of transforming their inherited belief into a living faith, 
by being compelled again and again to build it up from 
the foundations. 



THE TEACHER'S RELATION TO THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

FREEDOM FROM THE TYRANNY OF THE LETTER 

The modern Christian teacher has thus been given an 
opportunity to redeem his moral and intellectual integrity. 



io8 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

He has also been compelled to undertake a more funda- 
mental and living kind of teaching. The same process, 
however, has also delivered him from the tyranny of the 
letter of the New Testament. He has been delivered 
from all those arbitrary methods of exegesis and inter- 
pretation spurious homiletic uses of single phrases and 
texts, the licence of allegorical methods and the vagaries 
of the ingenuity exercised on predictions and apocalypses 
methods which are the inevitable consequence of insist- 
ence on the letter of Scripture. We have been compelled 
to recognize radical differences in value between sayings 
and to go behind the letter and the individual statements 
to the books of which they form a part and to the life 
and experience expressed in them. The letter becomes 
the handmaid of faith instead of being the tyrant of 
thought and belief. 

This, however, does not mean that the Christian 
teacher is cast adrift from the moorings of the New Testa- 
ment. Modern study has shown more clearly than ever 
how dependent he is in reality upon the New Testament. 
It is the only record of the founder, the foundation and 
first spread of the Christian Religion, the record of its 
formative age and of the classical types of the life it 
produces. From the New Testament we get our clearest 
knowledge of the Christian Gospel and ideal as well as 
of the various forms it took in the hands of its first teachers. 



A SPIRITUAL RELATION 

The difference now is that this tie with the New Testa- 
ment is not one of the letter but of the spirit. It is a 
relation, to use Paul's phrase, ' in Christ/ It not only 
allows but compels us to ask how the letter is connected 
with the spirit of the New Testament and what is the exact 
relation between it and the Christian Gospel. 

The practical effect, therefore, of our previous dis- 
cussions, so far as the personal attitude of the Christian 
teacher in relation to his task is concerned, may be de- 
scribed in brief as follows. The redemption of his in- 
tellectual integrity is secured, inasmuch as his dealing 
with the New Testament no longer implies the initial 



THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK 109 

acceptance of a ready-made theological dogma which 
cannot be examined in open court. 

He is compelled to face more fundamental questions 
which concern the validity and value of the New Testa- 
ment in general and in detail. He is delivered from the 
tyranny of the letter of the New Testament, inasmuch as 
the value of its written word depends upon the spiritual 
life and experience it expresses. 

The real nature of the relation between the teacher 
and the New Testament has been revealed as, first of all, 
historical, and then a spiritual relation. He is bound to 
it in the same sense as he is bound to the historic Christian 
Church, namely, in so far only as it preserves the Christian 
Gospel in spirit and atmosphere. 

THE PERSONAL LIFE OF THE TEACHER 

All this demands not only much harder and sterner 
work, but also a much fuller and richer personal religious 
life on the part of the teacher. For this there can be no 
substitute at all. No amount of objective respect for 
the record, no amount of historical faithfulness and no 
amount of intellectual honesty important and necessary 
as these are can ever make up for the lack of a personal 
experience of the moral and spiritual power of the Gospel. 
The historian and the philosopher may do a great deal for 
the New Testament and its interpretation, but merely as 
such they can never teach it in any full sense. That can 
only be done finally by the intelligent Christian disciple 
whose soul is continually fed by the Lord of the New 
Testament and of all life. 

Naturally, as compared with the traditional attitude 
towards the Bible, the attitude we have described may 
involve the danger of a rather pronounced subjectivity. 
That cannot be avoided, but its responsibility must be 
bravely shouldered, and it is partly compensated for by 
the emphasis on the historical objectivity of the Christian 
Gospel which will come to light in the following section. 



no THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

3 
THE COMMON TASK OF ALL TEACHERS 

So far, we have been dealing mainly with the more 
personal attitude of the Christian teacher in approaching 
his task. The task itself requires some fuller description 
and definition. 

If the discussions of the previous chapters mean any- 
thing they mean that once more, as in the early days of 
Christianity, the Christian teacher must stand shoulder 
to shoulder in the ranks of the vast army of the teachers 
of the human race, sharing in the same great task, bur- 
dened with the same great responsibilities, meeting the 
same difficulties and enjoying the same and only the same 
rights, privileges and opportunities. 

A TEACHING FELLOWSHIP 

Into this wide fellowship the Christian teacher should 
enter with enthusiasm, for it means that he and his task 
are no longer to be washed into an isolated backwater and 
kept there, but that he is to join with the mighty throng 
of those who sail the wide waters of the river of life. He 
will rejoice in this not only because his own work will be 
kept constantly in touch with the realities of the common 
life, but also because the task of all other educators will 
be widened in outlook and deepened in spirit by constant 
touch with the rich and inspiring material which he can 
bring to the common store. His moral authority will 
increase in proportion to his success in bringing his material 
into closer and closer contact with the living needs of 
men whose appetite will grow by what it feeds on. It will 
henceforth be his fault if an ' effective demand ' does not 
arise for what he has to offer. 

ALL TEACHERS ENGAGED IN MAKING MEN 

It may seem to him that many of the world's teachers 
must live continually far away beyond the boundaries 



THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK in 

of his territory, dealing with material which seems far 
removed from his specific task ; but he must never let 
himself forget that even teachers of Geography, Latin 
and Mathematics are somewhere or other leaving their 
mark upon the minds and souls of those whom he also 
has to teach, and that they need and in the end will 
value his help and comradeship to ensure that that mark 
should somehow or other become one of ' the marks of 
Jesus/ In time, the Christian teacher himself, depending 
solely upon the spontaneous inspiration and power of the 
moral and religious ideal depicted in the New Testament 
and incompletely but effectively in himself will find 
that he is called naturally to a place of pre-eminent 
and central influence for his work's sake. Read the Bible, 
it has been said, as an ordinary book, and it will soon 
become for you the most extraordinary book in the world. 
Let the Christian teacher also enter honestly into the 
common fellowship of the other human teachers of child 
and youth around him, sharing in the common task of 
shaping thought and heart and will, helping them to grow 
into free men, then he too will find the highest honour 
and dignity freely given to him. 



4 
TEACHING THE CHRISTIAN GOSPEL 

A distinctive and decisive place among the world's 
teachers belongs by right to the Christian teacher, mainly 
because he brings in his hands the New Testament as 
a teaching instrument of incomparable worth as far 
superior to any ' text-book of morality ' as Jesus Christ 
Himself is superior to the conventional life of men. It 
is by handling the New Testament aright that the Christian 
teacher will find and keep his rightful place. It is as a 
teacher of the New Testament that he should be known 
first and last by his effective use of its material for the 
fullest human education. He must not allow himself to 
think meanly or superficially of the meaning and range 
of his task. Teaching the New Testament well is the 



H2 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

most serious and arduous task to which the teacher ever 
set his hand. 

It does not mean using the New Testament as a dump- 
ing ground for our own small ideals and motives much 
less for our own theological beliefs and opinions or for 
our own fads and fancies. It does mean giving reliable 
information about the New Testament, about the contents 
and history of its books and about the background of 
the life from which they sprang. What we try to make 
the New Testament do educationally depends upon what 
the New Testament is. We must make it intelligible 
before we can make it interesting;, and it must become 
interesting before it can become effective. 

This study will attempt to do three things. It will 
seek to describe and appreciate (i) the Background of 
the New Testament ; (2) the New Testament as Literature 
and History ; and (3) the Religion and Theology of the 
New Testament. We must not underestimate the import- 
ance of this task, for it is the essential foundation upon 
which the higher aspects of teaching the New Testament 
must be built. In its main aspects it will come before 
us later on. 

To a large extent, however, it represents only the 
work of scaffolding, which must not be confused with the 
real task of building, upon which the teacher is engaged. 
We must keep it in its proper place, and more particularly 
that part of it which deals with the geographical, political 
and social background of the New Testament. Enough 
of this kind of knowledge must be given to make the 
books intelligible, but maps and models, the details of 
habits and customs of Oriental lands, must not be allowed 
to monopolize the time and energy of teacher and pupil 
as they have sometimes been in danger of doing. 

Teaching the New Testament itself means nothing 
less than teaching the essential content and message of 
the New Testament, or rather of the religious movement 
which created the New Testament. It means using the 
material which is peculiarly its own contribution to the 
life of the world in such a way and at such a time as to 
give the most effective impetus possible to the formation 
of character and to the making of personalities who have 



THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK 113 

a life to live and work to do in our modern world. Every- 
thing else is only preliminary to that. 

The final task which the serious Christian teacher has 
to do is a much more delicate and strenuous task than 
merely transmitting information about the New Testa- 
ment. He must grip securely the soul and power of the 
New Testament, while its soul and power must grip him 
organically, and through him become organically one 
with the life of men and the world. 



THE GOSPEL IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 

To do his work adequately, therefore, the teacher must 
take pains to find out what is the soul and power of 
the New Testament. We have already considered some 
aspects of this question in relation to the unity of the 
New Testament and to the unity which must be behind 
all the teacher's instruction. What we are here specially 
concerned with, is its place in the task of teaching the 
New Testament. In its more general relations the question 
is fast becoming the central and critical problem in all 
discussions of Christian history, Christian Ethics and 
Christian thought . What is Christianity ? What is its 
essence ? What is its peculiar contribution to the life 
of the world ? To use what is perhaps the most fitting 
phrase in this connection, and which we have already 
adopted for our purpose, what is the essential meaning 
and power of the Christian Gospel ? 

It is not easy to describe in explicit terms the situation 
created in this respect by the traditional theories of the 
infallibility of the written word of the Bible as an external 
authority. When Dean Burgon, from the University 
Pulpit at Oxford, not much more than half a century 
ago, could say of the Bible that " every book of it, every 
chapter of it, every verse of it, every syllable of it, every 
letter of it is the direct utterance of the Most High," it 
is evident that every part of the New Testament was 
as necessary to the Christian Gospel as every other part. 
In fact, the Gospel was literally the Bible. 



114 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

THE TRADITIONAL IDEA OF THE GOSPEL 

On the other hand, nothing was more characteristic 
of the old Evangelicalism than the idea of what was called 
' the simple Gospel ' always the same in form and 
substance for all men and for all times. Theoretically, 
at any rate, it stood in no vital relation to time and place. 
It was the business of the preacher simply to proclaim 
it to all and sundry, and it was sufficient for him to do so. 
This required no teaching in the proper sense at all, but 
simple proclamation and the exhortation to believe. 
This ' simple Gospel ' was the stock-in-trade of the 
orthodox evangelist a recipe for all the ills that flesh 
is heir to, and it was already made up for him into a dose 
in neat packets. It could be easily expressed in a series 
of apparently simple statements either of abstract truths 
or historical facts which comprised ' the plan of salva- 
tion.' This worked out in the end as the main points 
of a system of scholastic theology or, in the phraseology 
of a somewhat later time, of ' fundamental doctrines/ 
which was supposed to be the actual content of the 
New Testament and inseparably connected with the 
Virgin Birth, the Miracles, the atoning Death and the 
Resurrection. 

It is difficult for us now to realize how these two 
views of the Gospel, as identical with the Bible as a whole 
and yet at the same time a consistent system of truths, 
could be held together in the same mind. Yet we can 
see that they both sprang from the same root, namely, 
from the idea of Revelation and inspiration as external 
and supernatural. God, it was believed, had spoken to 
men once and for all from outside. His Word enters into 
life as a new and independent element, side by side with 
but untouched by human capacities, changes and circum- 
stances. That Word is the Bible. 



THE GOSPEL IN HISTORY 

We have certainly travelled far since these views of 
the Gospel and the New Testament could be held. We 
have seen too clearly the heterogeneous elements which 



THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK 115 

have entered into the making of the New Testament 
elements that are often inconsistent with each other 
and with the original teaching of Jesus. The only 
question now is as to how the Christian Gospel is related 
actually to the New Testament and in which direction 
we are to look for it. We may still speak of the ' simple 
Gospel/ but only in the sense that at the heart of the 
Christian movement there is a direct and inevitable 
appeal, so clear and so simple that to it every man can 
and must answer ' Yes ' or ' No.' There has never been 
such a Gospel as could be picked up like a stone and 
flung at men haphazard in the hope that it would hit 
one of them. One of the great things we have learnt is 
that the New Testament does not give us the Gospel as 
an abstract truth, but always in concrete relations. We 
cannot find the Gospel anywhere except embedded in 
history, and in the concrete relations of life. We find it 
in history intertwined with a vast mass of traditional 
material of all kinds, including Oriental imagery and 
myths, pagan ' mysteries,' Greek philosophy and Roman 
Law in Creeds, Sacraments and Church. We find it 
embedded in the life and experience that is behind the 
New Testament. It came to us first of all incarnate 
wrapped up in an historical life and as a life. It was 
' the Word made flesh ' and not the bare abstract Word. 
It was lived out at a certain historical period under 
definite and temporary historical circumstances. Its 
history since then is a process of organic growth and life 
in and through the circumstances of each age. It is in 
Christian history as the life is in the tree. That life 
cannot be separated from the sap and the roots, the trunk 
and the branches ; yet these take new forms and shapes 
with every new spring, while the life still lives and ex- 
presses itself through them in new ways. 



5 

THE NATURE OF THE CHRISTIAN GOSPEL 

We have already attempted to express the Gospel as 
the New Testament reveals it. It is the life ' in Christ,' 



n6 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

in Paul's phrase, expressed first of all in and through the 
personal life of Jesus under the definite conditions and 
meeting the definite needs of the first century in Palestine. 
It is subsequently expressed in the life of His disciples 
much more imperfectly, but still meeting and assimilating 
the circumstances, needs and problems of men in Antioch, 
Corinth and Rome. It is always the same life essentially, 
the Gospel of Christ and the religion of Jesus being only 
different forms and expressions of it. 

THE ORGANIC VIEW OF THE GOSPEL AND ITS EXPRESSIONS 

If the modern study of the Bible has taught us any- 
thing, it ought to have taught us to elevate above all 
else the ethical and religious content of the Gospel which 
underlies all its expressions. Faith in Christ must mean 
primarily faith in what Jesus stands for, and what Jesus 
stands for we must surely find in His own personal life 
in the spirit, attitude and character of Jesus, even more 
than in His verbal teaching. 

INTELLECTUAL STATEMENTS NECESSARY BUT INADEQUATE 

It is, then, this organic view of the Gospel as the life 
1 in Christ,' embodied in varying historical forms, which 
is the peculiar contribution of the New Testament. The 
distinguishing marks and the intrinsic values of this life 
we can, no doubt, as in the case of the tree, describe in a 
general way, but we never succeed in reducing the descrip- 
tion to quite universal terms or abstract statements, for 
we never find the life except in more or less temporary 
forms. There is always some element of limitation in 
the most general statement of its meaning and power. 
No expression exhausts its fulness, and every historical 
and intellectual expression of it includes something other 
than the thing itself. In accordance with the paradox of 
the spiritual life, this something more always means 
something less than the spiritual reality. The nearest 
we have come to expressing the Gospel in general state- 
ments is in such terms as the Fatherhood of God and the 
Brotherhood of Man, but we cannot look even upon these 
as the Gospel which makes the New Testament what it is. 



THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK 117 

Abstract statements, however true and however Christian, 
do not make up the Christian Gospel. 

More or less abstract statements we must, in the 
nature of the case, have, and they have their own place 
in education. It will again and again be necessary for 
the teacher to realize the Gospel as including certain 
definite intellectual principles or convictions, and as 
embodying definite moral qualities clearly related to each 
other. There is, however, probably no analysis of this 
kind which will at present command universal assent. 
One will interpret the Gospel mainly in religious terms 
of the Fatherhood of God and childlike trust in Him ; 
while another will start from the Brotherhood of man, 
and so emphasize the ethical call of the Gospel to the 
persistent, loving service of men ; while still another will 
prefer to express it in terms of constant and prompt 
obedience to conscience, and so emphasize the realization 
of the highest and fullest personal life. What is here 
emphasized is that the teacher must use these interpreta- 
tions and especially those of the New Testament in 
order to lead his pupil deeper and deeper into the life 
and personality of Jesus Himself, as greater far than 
all attempts to interpret and to explain Him. 

THE PRINCIPLES AND SPIRIT OF JESUS 

When, therefore, we speak of teaching the New Testa- 
ment, we cannot mean by it simply the proclamation of 
certain moral and religious truths, however important. 
We cannot mean by it even teaching Jesus Christ in the 
sense of getting men to imitate the individual outer or 
inner life of Jesus. It must mean in the end to spread 
the life that was in Jesus in such a way as to make it 
organically one with all the manifestations of life in our 
day and express itself in all the circumstances and move- 
ments of our life. The historical and practical conse- 
quences of the Gospel are inevitable and involved in its 
existence, though they may vary from age to age. These 
consequences are at the same time both personal and 
social ; they are ethical and intellectual ; and the 
Christian Gospel is not taught effectively to any age until 



Ii8 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

these consequences are made plain and urgent to its mind 
and heart and will to its conscience. 

METHODS AND AGENCIES, OLD AND NEW 

For the teacher of the New Testament, therefore, there 
is no stopping-place until this whole task is accomplished. 
It is his duty and privilege not only to have the nature of 
this task clear in his mind and urgent upon his conscience, 
but to search for every method and agency which is 
capable of being used for the purpose. The Church 
already provides him with its traditional educational 
agencies in the pulpit and Sunday School. Both need 
to be transformed, however, in order to become efficient 
instruments of Christian education and instruction. The 
official Christian ministry and pulpit especially will have 
to take its teaching work much more seriously. We 
cannot avoid this by pleading our prophetic mission. 
The permanent influence of the prophetic afflatus and 
message itself can only be guaranteed by more systematic 
teaching. It can only be filled with meaning and power 
by its educational content and end. In fact, all the 
traditional institutions of the Church need overhauling 
from this educational point of view ; while in order to 
meet the changes in outlook and in the nature and range 
of the Christian task, the Church must also go in search 
of new methods and new agencies through which its work 
can be more effectively done. It is true that the Church 
must use the New Testament more than it does for pro- 
viding itself with the Christian instruction it so badly 
needs. It is, however, called also to the Christian educa- 
tion of the world at large. 

For this purpose, we need agencies more definitely 
organized for the instruction of youth and maturity. It 
should be much more public in character through public 
lectures and free discussions quite different from the 
present more or less private meetings of the Church. 
There is need also for a more intellectual and clarifying 
type of instruction than the present ' edifying ' methods 
provide. An order of public Christian teachers whose 
main business was to organize educational agencies of this 
kind would be a great boon. 



THE CHRISTIAN TEACHER AND HIS TASK 119 

The task of the Christian teacher, therefore, so far as 
the New Testament is concerned, is threefold. He must 
transmit a knowledge of the New Testament its back- 
ground, literature, history, ethics, religion and theology. 
He must use this material in order to make clear and 
enforce the essential meaning and message of the New 
Testament, its peculiar contribution to the life of the 
world, the Christian Gospel and its power. He must 
finally use this Gospel and its power as an integral part 
of all the influences which all kinds of educators are bring- 
ing to bear upon the human young in particular, in order 
to grow ideal Christian personalities and a society of such 
personalities in the Kingdom of God. 

All this implies and demands an efficient teaching 
ministry in many forms. The Christian teacher is as 
necessary to the Christian Gospel as the Gospel itself, and 
a clear idea of its nature and meaning are necessary to 
him. Nothing less than a consistent, persistent and 
insistent policy and campaign of Christian education will 
ever meet the need. To have the larger share in this task 
of Christianizing the world in practice of putting the 
stamp of Jesus upon all its life in every department is 
the privilege and responsibility of the teacher of the New 
Testament. 

BOOKS 

AYRE (G. B.). Suggestions for a Syllabus in Religious Teaching. 

(London, 1911.) 
BRYANT (SOPHIE). How to read the Bible in the Twentieth Century. 

(London, 1918.5) 

DENNEY (J.). Jesus and the Gospel. (London, 1913.) 
FAUNCE (W. H. P.). The Educational Ideal of the Ministry. (New 

York, 1908.) 
FORSYTH (P. T.). Positive Preaching and the Modern Mind. (London, 

1907.) 
HACKENSCHMIDT (K.). Die Christus-Predigt fur unsere Zeit. (Gottin- 

gen, 1909.) 

HASLETT (S. B.). The Pedagogical Bible School. (Chicago, 1903.) 
PEASE (G. W.). An Outline of a Bible-School Curriculum. (Chicago, 

1906.) 
RAYMONT (T.). The Use of the Bible in the Religious Education of the 

Young. (London, 1911.) 
ZURHELLEN (ELSE UND OTTO). Wie erzdhlen wir den Kindern die 

biblischen Geschichten ? (Tubingen, 1906.) 



PART II 

TEACHING THE NEW TESTAMENT : ITS 
MAIN PROBLEM 



VII. THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD. 

VIII. THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST FOR ADOLESCENCE. 
IX. TEACHING THE PARABLES. 
X. THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES. 
XI. THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS. 
XII. THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS. 
XIII. THE JOHANNINE LITERATURE, THOUGHT AND LIFE. 
XIV. JESUS CHRIST AND THE KINGDOM OF GOD. 



CHAPTER VII 

THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 

1. Presentations of Christ in the New Testament. Christ in Christian 

Instruction The Synoptic, Pauline and Johannine Types of 
Life and Thought The Main Features of Each. 

2. The Synoptic Presentation in Instruction. Difficulties of the Gospels 

The Gospels in Modern Instruction Teaching of Infancy and 
Childhood in Relation to Adolescence. 

3. The Historical Life of Jesus. Presentation of Christ to Childhood- 

Must be Historical Historical Value of the Gospels The Use 
of Non-historical Material. 

4. Content of the Life of Jesus. Outline Boyhood and Youth Main 

Elements of the Public Ministry Last Days and Death The 
Story in the Gospels Makes a Difficult Demand Dramatic 
Elements Educational Dangers Aims and Methods of the 
Teacher The Resurrection. 

5. Moral and Religious Appreciation. Love for Jesus and its Qualities 

Moral, Intelligent and Reverent Based on the Love of Jesus 
for Men Main Features of His Life for Boyhood Heroic, 
Adventurous and Joyous Love. 



PRESENTATIONS OF CHRIST IN THE NEW 
TESTAMENT 

CHRIST IN CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTION 

AT this stage of our discussion it may reasonably be taken 
for granted that the central task of Christian education 
is to bring the growing personality more and more into 
vital union with the spirit and will of Jesus Christ, and 
to secure the thorough application of that ' life in Christ ' 
in and to all the manifold relations of life personal and 

social . 

133 



124 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Correspondingly, the task of Christian instruction 
(which is only one aspect of education) is to present Jesus 
Christ in His life and teaching, His work and personality, 
in such a way and at such a time as to help effectively in 
bringing about that vital union with Christ and its personal 
and social application. It follows that the essential 
meaning of teaching the New Testament is to make 
effective use of its material for that definite, moral and 
religious purpose, and for every subordinate end that 
may be necessary for the purpose. 

It is therefore evident that the spirit of Christ must not 
only animate the teaching throughout, but also that the 
central place must be assigned to the actual presentation 
of Jesus Christ Himself. 



THE THREE MAIN TYPES OF THOUGHT IN THE 
NEW TESTAMENT 

That, of course, must be supremely true of the New 
Testament part of Christian instruction, for it might well 
be said that the New Testament is nothing else but a 
series of presentations of Christ. There are in it almost 
as many presentations of Christ as there are writers. 
They may be conveniently divided, however, into three 
main types, namely, the Synoptic, the Pauline and the 
Johannine. These represent the three main forms in 
which the Christian Gospel was presented in the formative 
period of Christian history. Naturally, these three are 
not independent of one another, but reveal a definite 
development of Christian experience and thought in 
contact with a different environment. They may roughly 
be distinguished from one another by saying that the 
Synoptic Gospels present Jesus as the Messiah ; that Paul 
presents Him as the redeeming Son of God ; while the 
Fourth Gospel presents Him as the revealing Logos or 
Word of God. 

In their different ways, all three look upon Him as in 
some sense divine. In the Synoptics, His divine dignity 
comes to Him partly at His birth, but mainly at His 
baptism ; in Paul, His divine powers (in some way not 
quite clear) are in a state of suspense during His life on 



THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 125 

earth, but become active in a new way through the Cross 
and Resurrection ; while in John the earthly life is only 
another mode of His full divine existence. 

To a greater or less degree, all three are theological 
constructions based upon and issuing from the historical 
life and death of Jesus of Nazareth, combined with a 
definite appreciation of His moral and religious value. 

THE MAIN FEATURES OF EACH TYPE 

These three elements of historical life, religious ap- 
preciation and theological construction, are mixed in very 
different proportions and co-ordinated in very different 
ways in the three presentations. In the Synoptics, the 
history is by far the most significant factor, and it is what 
stamps the whole. The appreciation is mainly one of 
the moral value of the teaching of Jesus, while the theo- 
logical element makes itself felt mainly in a definite 
apologetic tendency which is only loosely combined with 
the life and death. 

The Pauline presentation, on the other hand, is marked 
by the predominance of the theological point of view. 
This is so closely interwoven with the religious apprecia- 
tion that it is often a very difficult task to separate the 
two, and sometimes it is quite impossible. With the 
exception of the death, the historical life almost dis- 
appears from the presentation, though there are many 
signs that it is always in the background, and that it was 
one of the main factors in the origin of both the religious 
appreciation and the theological construction. 

The presentation of Christ in the Johannine literature 
is, at the same time, a further development of Pauline 
ideas and an attempt to combine the Pauline conception 
with the Synoptic type. The Johannine presentation 
thus becomes a theology or a philosophy put into the 
form of a life of Christ. Here the historical element, the 
religious appreciation and the theological construction 
are almost inextricably mixed up together in such an 
intimate way that it seems a hopeless task to try to keep 
them apart or to express them separately. 

It will be agreed that in dealing with the main 



126 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

problems raised by the use of the New Testament in 
modern Education, we must deal first with the Synoptic 
presentation as the earliest and the simplest as well as 
the most historical of the three main types of life and 
thought in the New Testament. We must try to see what 
is its place and value in our moral and religious instruction 
what elements in it are available for our main purpose, 
and when they can be used with most effect. 



THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION IN 
INSTRUCTION 

It is evident that the full presentation, even of the 
simplest of the Synoptic Gospels, cannot be adequately 
appreciated before childhood's days are well over. It is 
quite possible and even probable that most of the material 
of the first three Gospels was derived from the catechetical 
instruction of the Early Church ; but if so, it was certainly 
not the instruction of children. It must have been that 
of growing youths and adults. 

DIFFICULTIES OF THE GOSPELS 

That naturally does not mean that there are no 
elements in Mark, Matthew and Luke eminently suitable 
for the instruction of children of all ages. What it does 
mean is that the material they provide must often be 
taken out of its context, and must always be specially 
adapted for use during the earlier periods of life. The 
Synoptic presentation as a whole belongs peculiarly to 
the adolescent stage. There are also other difficulties 
in the way of using the Synoptic material in its actual 
Biblical form for the purpose of introducing Jesus Christ 
to the younger children. For instance, there are three 
Synoptic Gospels, and the question must immediately 
arise as to whether we should make one the basis, and 
gather the material of the others around it for the pur- 
poses of instruction, or use a kind of amalgam of all three, 



I 



THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 127 

as is often suggested. Both methods, however, involve 
some adaptation of the Synoptic presentation under the 
influence of a more or less subjective point of view. 

Further, it is plain that there are moral, religious 
and theological conceptions in each of the Gospels which 
are definitely above the comprehension of any child of 
nine or ten. Such are the ideas of Messiah, the Son of 
Man, Son of God, as well as many of the conceptions 
of the Sermon on the Mount. 

Moreover, the kind of appreciation of Jesus that we 
find in the Synoptic Gospels is not always such as we can 
desire to perpetuate in our permanent valuation of Him. 
Only too often they seem to describe Him in terms of 
supernatural and miraculous power. It is implied that 
some of His deeds are displays of sheer divine power. It 
is true that this element is not usually a part of the deed 
itself ; it is often easily separable from the substance of 
the incident narrated. The act itself is generally capable 
of interpretation under other categories than mere power. 
In any case, we cannot wish to allow an impression of 
Jesus as a prodigy of mere power to become the primary 
element in our appreciation of Him upon the mind of 
child or youth. There are indeed plenty of signs that 
Jesus Himself desired to avoid anything of the kind. 

On the other hand, on the face of the Synoptic narra- 
tives, the appreciation of Jesus in terms of His personal 
character and personal religion appears to be of only second- 
ary interest to the writers. They certainly supply us with 
plenty of material for reconstructing the main features 
of His personal religion, but often we have to do so out 
of elusive suggestions and incidental references. Any 
permanent interpretation of Christ will of necessity 
reverse this order of interest and scale of values. Our 
highest terms will be those of character and personality 
with the stress upon personal religion and the moral will. 

Finally, the Synoptic presentation sometimes consists 
of narratives which certainly in their present form do not 
belong to the historical life of Jesus, but are rather symbols 
of the Synoptic faith in Christ and the creations of that 
faith. As we shall see, modern religious instruction may 
be able to make very good use both of the moral content 



128 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

as well as the form of these legendary stories, but it is 
not often that they can in their Biblical form become 
part of our presentation of Jesus itself. Their place and 
value and the method of using them in Biblical instruc- 
tion, must be more fully discussed later. 

No MERE REPRODUCTION OF THE GOSPELS POSSIBLE 

All this means that our presentation of Christ can 
never be anything like a literal reproduction of the 
Synoptic construction. We must be satisfied at first with 
something less, and always with something different in 
its motive and purpose. In fact, we must dig below the 
surface for the richest veins of gold underneath, if we wish 
to use the Synoptic presentation of Christ effectively 
for the moral and spiritual ends of the Christian Gospel. 
Mark, Matthew and Luke provide us with an abundant 
wealth of material, and the most essential material for 
the purpose ; but if we are to use it effectively in Christian 
instruction we must be free to select and adapt it, to a 
greater or less degree, to the needs and capacities of the 
varying stages of moral and religious growth. 

In order to find out what to select and how to adapt, 
we must return for a moment to our psychological results. 
As we have seen, the material of the New Testament in 
its full sense, and especially its presentations of Christ, 
are the natural food of adolescence. All the teaching 
given to infants and children is from this point of view 
only preparatory, just to the degree that childhood itself 
is a preparation for adolescence. 

CHILDHOOD IN RELATION TO ADOLESCENCE 

There is, however, another sense and one quite as 
real in which it is true that each period of human growth 
represents not merely a stage on the way to a higher, 
but something complete in itself, different from and 
independent of the life of every other period. In this 
sense, infancy and childhood have each its own Gospel 
adequate for itself and corresponding to its need. That 
may be a Christian Gospel as Christian in its spirit as 






THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 129 

that of adolescence but it is necessary to remember 
that it can never be the full Christian Gospel. 

It may be said, therefore, that in our effort to present 
Christ, the adequacy of our instruction will depend upon 
our success in combining these two points of view, namely, 
that of infancy and childhood as preparatory stages on 
the way to adolescence and maturity, with that of the 
same periods as revealing their own independent life 
and needs which do not depend upon adolescence for 
their completion. 

To combine successfully these two points of view in 
the working out of a scheme of instruction and education, 
is one of the supreme tasks of the Christian teacher. 
What may be offered here or elsewhere can only be very 
inadequate suggestions based upon very imperfect know- 
ledge. Nevertheless, the attempt must be made again 
and again to solve the problem as one of the central 
difficulties of religious teaching. 



THE HISTORICAL LIFE OF JESUS 

PRESENTATION OF CHRIST TO CHILDHOOD 

We do not come face to face with the real difficulties 
of the problem until we have to deal with the instruction 
of late childhood (between the ages of nine and twelve). 

There is a fairly general agreement among modern 
educators that this is the fit and proper time for making 
the first attempt to give anything like a consistent and 
more or less systematic picture of Jesus, and that the 
attempt should be made towards the beginning rather 
than the end of this period. 

Naturally, the child will have already been told 
a number of suitable Wonder-tales and other stories of 
which Jesus is in some sense the hero ; but so far they 
have been told only as individual stories complete in 
themselves. They have been told also not so much for 
the sake of giving a picture of Jesus as for the sake of 
somelelement of educational value in each story itself. 
9 



130 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

At about eight or nine years of age, however, the child 
is ready to appreciate to some degree a connected series of 
stories, and in an elementary way the picture of a growing 
personality as well as the meaning of history as dis- 
tinguished from an independent ' once-upon-a-time ' story. 
There is an opportunity of impressing upon the mind 
some simple, consistent and clear picture of Jesus, through 
His deeds and words, in His relations with God, man and 
the world around Him. 

The questions of the special aim, general character, 
form and content of this first deliberate presentation of 
Christ are essentially educational questions, although 
some theological considerations are undoubtedly involved 
in any attempt to answer them. Educational principles 
and methods ought to be the decisive factors, and, 
fortunately, substantial agreement is to be found among 
those best qualified to form an opinion with regard to 
the main points. 

MUST BE ESSENTIALLY HISTORICAL 

In the first place, the presentation of Christ for child- 
hood should, without any doubt, be essentially historical. 
This is not meant in the sense that every item of it must 
be guaranteed as literal fact by historical criticism, but 
in the sense that it must provide the picture of a life 
actually lived out under definite historical circumstances 
of time and place. It must not be left hanging in the 
air, as it were, out of effective touch with the earth. 
Without overdoing the local colouring and the more 
trifling peculiarities of the time, it ought to be the picture 
of an individual Jew of Galilee in the first century. The 
universal elements themselves, which are so evident 
in the life of Jesus, demand this individual background 
in order to reveal their meaning and power. That is 
one of the great advantages of the biographical approach 
to history and religion, and we must make the most of it 
at this stage. The adaptability of the Synoptic presenta- 
tion for this very purpose is also the very reason why it 
is to be preferred to the Pauline and the Johannine 
presentations for purposes of instruction. 



I 



THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 131 



THE HISTORICAL VALUE OF THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS 

This, of course, raises the whole question of the 
historical value of the Synoptic Gospels. If the teacher 
re ever led to believe that no such person as Jesus ever 
lived, it would make the task of teaching the New Testa- 
ment a very different thing. Whatever might be the 
effect of such a conclusion upon the value of the Christian 
religion, it would certainly reduce the value of the New 
Testament as an educational instrument, especially for 
this period of life, to a much lower level. The Synoptic 
material would then have to be relegated to a later period 
to keep company with the Johannine Gospel. Instead 
of the life of Jesus at this time, we should have to be 
satisfied with a life of Paul material much more difficult 
to handle and of far less value for this age as the first 
personal bearer of the spiritual and moral values of early 
Christianity. 

It does not, however, appear that the Christian teacher 
will ever be called upon to face the need for such a radical 
revolution in connection with teaching the New Testament 
and the Christian religion. This radical attack upon the 
fundamental historical character of the Synoptic Gospels 
has far less prospect of success to-day than ever, though 
it will probably always remain as one of the many ques- 
tions which ought to have some discussion as part of 
the general problem of the relation between Christianity 
and History. 

It may now be taken for granted that the Synoptic 
Gospels do provide us with sufficient reliable material 
to construct a historical picture of Jesus in the main 
features of His character, deeds and words. Once that is 
granted, difficulties with regard to particular incidents 
and sayings can be overcome. To most modern teachers, 
passages here and there may appear to be unhistorical. 
It is scarcely to be expected that there will ever be absolute 
agreement in detail with regard to what can and what 
cannot be included in a strictly historical life of Jesus. 
Every teacher must, in the end, fix his own limits, and 
the only rule that can be laid down is that naturally no 



132 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

honest teacher will repeat as history what he does not 
believe to be history. 

This, however, does not mean that he cannot use even 
legendary incidents and that for historical purposes 
in his narrative of the life of Jesus. Such incidents, 
when properly introduced by some non-committal 
formula, may, indeed, have a useful part to play in what 
is intended to be an historical presentation of Christ. 

THE USE OF NON-HISTORICAL MATERIAL 

Another element also which cannot be called strictly 
historical must always enter into any attempt to picture 
Jesus as a whole. The Synoptic Gospels after all only 
provide us with a somewhat uncertain chronological 
framework, into which are inserted a number of incidents 
and sayings which vary in each Gospel, and are differently 
arranged in each. The whole of the early life up to the 
baptism is practically a blank, while the geographical, 
political, social and religious background of the particular 
incidents, as well as of the story as a whole, is only barely 
indicated. 

Some of this background must, in any case, be supplied 
in order to make the life and sayings of Jesus intelligible, 
and it can only be supplied by the constructive exercise 
of the well-informed historical imagination. To convey 
the impression of Jesus as a historical person, some 
attempt must be made to describe the home at Nazareth, 
His education, His work as a carpenter, the growth of 
His mind, etc. all the elements necessary to make His 
first public appearance natural and intelligible. Of all 
these things we have no direct historical records only 
hints and suggestions. They must always remain imagi- 
native constructions, based on our general historical 
information. 

When, therefore, we speak of a historical life, it is 
not meant that every item of it must consist of undoubted 
facts of history in the strict and narrow sense. Our 
nucleus of history must be eked out, on the one hand, 
by the introduction of stories and incidents which may 
of doubtful authenticity. These are historical only 



THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 



133 



the sense that they were actually told of Jesus at a very 
early time, and perhaps even during His lifetime. They 
will naturally be told as such, and they will be told because 
they help in some way to make the picture of Jesus 
clearer by revealing the sort of impression He made upon 
His disciples and contemporaries. They are true to Him 
even though they may not be true of Him. 

On the other hand, the gaps in our historical material 
must, somehow, be filled by imaginative constructions 
true to the record of history, and based upon what we 
know from other sources about the time, the land and 
the people of Jesus. 

What is primarily intended, then, is that we should 
make a deliberate attempt to describe the real life of a 
real person among real men in real circumstances. 



THE CONTENT OF THE LIFE OF JESUS 

OUTLINES OF THE LIFE OF JESUS 

The framework of the narrative is already laid down 
for us in the Gospels, and it follows quite simply the 
childhood and youth, the public ministry in all its aspects, 
the trial, death and resurrection. The discussion in detail 
of most of the educational problems connected with the 
treatment of the material content of the narrative will 
be found in other chapters. We shall here deal mainly 
with the more definitely historical aspects of the life. 

i . Introduction . Though Mark 's historical record begins 
with the Baptism, and the Gospels of Matthew and Luke 
bring us no certain direct information about the birth 
and childhood of Jesus, yet we cannot do without some 
kind of introduction. Such an introduction might proceed 
on one or all of three lines. 

We might start with some features of modern life 
that are familiar to the children Churches, the seasons of 
Christmas and Easter, the meaning of the Christian era 
all leading us back to Jesus and creating an interest in 
Him. 



134 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Secondly, we might describe the people of the Jews 
and their original country still starting from modern 
times and going back to Jesus and Palestine. 

Finally, the third line of approach might be through 
the birth-narratives. They would be given as stories 
told about Jesus with a view to deepening the impression 
already made, that He must have been a marvellous 
person. The teacher would not raise the question of 
their truth at all unless it be definitely put to him. If 
the question is asked, he must take the responsibility of 
explaining the position as he sees it, insisting upon the 
value of the stories (whether ' true ' or not) as showing 
how great Jesus must have been to make people tell 
and believe such stories of Him. 

For this purpose, the Birth-stories can be told in very 
much their Biblical form. 



BOYHOOD AND YOUTH 

Following this should come some account of the child- 
hood and youth of Jesus, though of Him as an individual 
we only know that He lived in Nazareth, and that probably 
He was a carpenter by trade like His father Joseph. It 
is, however, still possible to reconstruct enough of the 
external life of a Galilean boy of that time, His home 
life, His education and probable journey to Jerusalem, 
to serve as a background and preparation for the latei 
experiences. From the Gospels themselves also, 
reading between the lines, we can infer a good deal with 
regard to what must have been happening in the inner 
life of Jesus during His youth. Many of His parables 
are mirrors of His personal and early experiences, as well 
as of the Gospel He wished to enforce. 

Out of these elements a plausible and probable picture 
of the childhood and youth of Jesus may without much 
difficulty be reconstructed. The purpose of such a 
picture is to make the children feel that they are hearing 
of the real life of a real man, to give a concrete background 
to the public life, to prepare for it and to provide the 
appropriate atmosphere. Essentially it will be an ex- 
pansion of the brief description of the Gospels : " Thei 



THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 135 

He went down with them and came to Nazareth, and was 
always obedient to them ; but His mother carefully 
treasured up all these incidents in her memory. And as 
Jesus grew older He gained in both wisdom and stature, 
and in favour with God and man " (Luke ii. 51, 52). 

MAIN ELEMENTS OF THE PUBLIC MINISTRY 

2. Public Ministry. In the public ministry we come 
for the first time to the personal history, and the task of 
the teacher is to use the material of the Gospels to give 
as vivid and as clear a picture as possible of Jesus strug- 
gling and fighting for great spiritual ideals and values. 
There ought not to be very much need for the teacher to 
talk in any formal way of these spiritual values of which 
Jesus was the bearer. The values are in the history 
itself, and will make their own power felt. What the 
teacher has to do is to find the most effective arrangement 
and grouping of the facts in order to give an interesting 
presentation of them to children of this age. Here 
some preparatory scenes will come first : John the Baptist, 
the Baptism of Jesus, the Temptation, the first public 
appearance at Nazareth and the calling of the disciples. 
The emphasis is mainly upon the relation of Jesus to God, 
His consciousness of Sonship, His sense of a divine 
mission. 

Then will come most naturally the early ministry in 
Galilee, wherein Jesus appears as the Helper and Healer 
of men in body and soul. This part of the narrative will 
consist of a selection of the stories of healing, some of the 
parables and other incidents which can be brought into 
appropriate relation with them. 

It is the time when " the common people heard Him 
gladly," and when the controversies with the Pharisees 
had not yet arisen. The climax of the narrative of the 
ministry is only reached by attempting to show Jesus 
on one side fighting strenuously with the Pharisees for 
His ideals, and on the other devoting Himself to explain- 
ing them to His own disciples. He appears as the Prophet 
and the Teacher, and it is here undoubtedly that the main 
stress of the life of Jesus must always come. Education- 



136 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

ally, as we shall see when we come to deal with adolescence, 
the controversy with the Pharisees is the most valuable 
element in the Gospels ; but at this age we cannot do very 
much to make the difference between the ideals of Jesus 
and those of the Pharisees clear, yet some attempt should 
even here be made to narrate the main facts in such a way 
as to reveal some of their significance in this respect. 

THE PROPHET AND THE TEACHER 

In this section, therefore, should be grouped well-chosen 
examples of the controversial incidents and parables as 
well as examples of the positive side of the same struggle 
to maintain the higher ideals in the intimate talks of 
Jesus with His disciples. These latter find their centre in 
the conversation at Csesarea Philippi and the Transfigura- 
tion. All this represents only one method of grouping 
the incidents of the Gospels, and it attempts to combine 
a topical and chronological arrangement. Several other 
suggestions, equally justifiable, might be made, but in any 
case only a few examples of each type of incident and 
teaching can be given. 

3. The Last Days, Death and Resurrection. In this 
section of the narrative the main incidents will be the 
journey to Jerusalem, the Entry, Cleansing the Temple, 
the Passover and the Last Supper, the Betrayal by Judas, 
the scene in Gethsemane, the Trial, the Crucifixion and the 
Resurrection. It is easy to enumerate them, but not so 
easy to deal in any satisfactory way with the many educa- 
tional problems they present (e.g. the problems of pre- 
senting the Messiahship of Jesus, the character of Judas, 
how to give any intelligible account of the attitude of the 
Jewish leaders and authorities, and how generally to 
present to children the story of the Trial, Death and 
Resurrection without doing more harm than good). One 
can only make a few suggestions with regard to the treat- 
ment of some of them. 

FEATURES OF THE STORY IN THE GOSPELS 

The story of the last days and death of Jesus is told in 
the Gospels with extraordinary restraint, simplicity and 






THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 137 

dignity. The narrative as a whole represents the highest and 
noblest literary achievement of the Early Church. There 
is nothing else in the New Testament to compare with its 
power to move the heart and will, for it is the most effective 
portrayal of the most effective fact in the history of the 
world. It is so especially for those who can refrain from 
mixing up their own rigid system of theology with the 
story of the Gospels ; who have some power of reading 
between the lines, and have some understanding of the 
circumstances and of the thoughts and ideals of the actors 
in the drama. These facts will not have much need of the 
teacher. He will simply have to see that they approach 
the narratives in the proper attitude and look at them 
from the right point of view. It is true that here as 
elsewhere there are many literary and historical problems, 
and that it is a subordinate part of the teacher's work 
to meet them sometime in some way. In the older classes, 
occasion must be found to deal with them frankly, and to 
interpret even the legendary elements in relation to the 
meaning of the Cross for the Early Church . Dealing with 
the literary or historical difficulties, however, is of little 
importance compared with the main problem, which is a 
purely educational one. 



MAKES A DIFFICULT DEMAND UPON THE TEACHER 

In one sense it may well be said that in teaching these 
last lessons we are face to face with the fundamental 
and final task of all religious instruction. When we have 
thoroughly learnt and taught the meaning and power of 
the Cross and the Risen Life, it might legitimately be 
said that the Christian lesson has come to its natural 
end. It is often the case, however, that we fail to teach 
that final lesson thoroughly, either because we try to 
teach it too early, or because we do not prepare the way 
for it carefully enough. Both arise from the fact that in 
our teaching w r e do not follow closely enough the matter 
and method of the Gospels in dealing with these final 
scenes in the story of Jesus. Their way is to bring before 
us historical narratives of concrete incidents, leaving them 
to make their own impressions on the mind. We are so 



138 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

accustomed to our own dogmatic interpretations that 
we do not in our teaching trust the method of the Gospels, 
but are always tempted to read them in the light of the 
Pauline Epistles. This does not mean that the method 
of the Epistles has no place in religious instruction, but 
only that it has no place when we are in the region of the 
Gospels, which is the life of Jesus. It is true that there 
is a dogmatic element in all the Gospels, but what is 
truer still is that it is practically absent when the writers 
are dealing with the trial and death of Jesus. That is a 
true educational instinct, and if we are to follow it, our 
lessons must consist of an attempt to bring our pupils 
directly under the influence of the facts themselves, and 
to let the facts speak for themselves to the human heart. 
The Gospels themselves make it very plain what this 
will mean, for they give the story of the Cross as the 
climax of the life of Jesus and of the hard-fought struggle 
between Him and His enemies. With every incident 
as it comes, the convictions of Jesus with regard to God 
and His Kingdom are more and more sharply contrasted 
with those of the people around Him. The real character 
of the opposing forces is more and more clearly revealed. 
The time for compromise is past, and both sides pursue 
their purpose to the bitter end. There is no evading 
a final decision between them. 



DRAMATIC ELEMENTS IN THE STORY 

If Jesus in utter faithfulness to His faith goes forward 
undismayed to take upon Himself the final consequences 
of that faith, His enemies also become utterly reckless 
in the pursuit of their purpose, and never falter in their 
campaign of hate. Such is the dramatic impression which 
these last scenes made upon the minds of the early dis- 
ciples. To transmit that impression faithfully is the 
central task of the teacher. 

The Gospels, it is true, show us that the facts have 
to some extent been edited, but the editing has always 
taken what we may call a psychological direction. That 
is to say, the Early Church so moulded the narrative as 
to bring out more dramatically still the contest between 



THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 139 

fundamentally different ideals ; and in their hands the 
various actors have become almost universal types of 
the different attitudes involved in such a contest. They 
have thus made Jesus, the religious leaders, Judas, Pilate, 
Peter and the others stand out before us as great typical 
figures in the universal struggle for and against God and 
His kingdom. They do not seem to have done any in- 
justice to the facts in this way, for they have only brought 
out more clearly the meaning which was inherent in them. 
The redemptive power is in the history, if only the mind 
and the heart can be brought directly and humbly face 
to face with it. 

EDUCATIONAL DANGERS 

Narrating the life of Jesus for childhood, the first task 
of the teacher is to consider how much of this historical 
and psychological meaning can be effectively brought 
home to the child. The concrete and dramatic story of 
the Cross and its external incidents are such as will be 
easily followed with interest and intelligence by them. 
It is not so easy to give the right impression of the motives 
and inner experiences involved. It is difficult, especially, 
to do anything like justice to the enemies of Jesus. There 
is nothing in the experience of the children which can 
help them to understand why the Jews should put a man 
like Jesus to death. Their actions will seem to be utterly 
without sense or reason. That is one of the dangers of 
telling the story of the Cross too early. Some attempt 
must already have been made to explain in some simple 
fashion the contrast between the popular, national and 
military ideas of the Messiah with the peaceful and 
spiritual conception of Jesus Himself with regard to the 
Kingdom of God. This will help the children to under- 
stand how Jesus came to be condemned for blasphemy ; 
and though they will not be able to follow the deeper 
motives of the leaders, the tragedy may become to some 
extent intelligible to them. 

METHOD AND AIMS OF THE TEACHER 

The method to be adopted by the teacher also requires 
a great deal of consideration. He must either tell the 



140 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

story or read it from the Gospels, or a selection from them. 
The difficulty about telling the story freely in this instance 
is, that the composition of the story in such a way as to 
reproduce the spirit, atmosphere and impression of the 
Gospel narrative is a very difficult and dangerous task. 
It is not only that its composition by the teacher means 
a great deal of careful thinking, for that could be over- 
come here as elsewhere. The great danger is that our 
narrative should become sentimental instead of repre- 
senting the strong, moving pathos of the scene. On the 
other hand, the difficulty about reading the story in the 
Gospels is that we need a picture which can only be 
painted by fusing together elements from them all, and 
there is a danger of destroying the best impression by 
passing to and fro from one to another. But whether 
he decides on telling the story of the Cross or reading it, 
there are some points which the teacher must bear in 
mind throughout. 

(a) His great aim should be to bring the children 
face to face with Jesus as He goes to His death, and to 
let nothing stand between the story itself and the heart 
of the child. Let him stand for once directly under the 
influence of the human tragedy and triumph of the 
scenes themselves as elements in human history, freed 
from all theological dogma, and especially without the 
intrusion of the dogmatic temper. 

(b) In particular, we need to be warned against letting 
the figure of ' the Lamb of God/ passively suffering His 
doom, have too much control over the description. Let 
the heroic, majestic side of the innocence of Jesus be 
emphasized. 

(c) So far as possible also, it should become clear how 
the attitude and words of Jesus bring before us the whole 
meaning of His life and Gospel. Even now it is the filial 
trust towards God and the brotherly service of others 
that mark Him and His words. ' Father ' is still His 
name for God, and it is of others that He thinks and not 
of Himself. This may, after all, be the best way of saving 
the children from a mere ignorant and unreasoning hate 
of the enemies of Jesus. " Father, forgive them, for they 
know not what they do.'' 






THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 141 

EDUCATIONAL PROBLEM OF THE RESURRECTION 

The story of the Resurrection presents a very different 
problem, which is dealt with elsewhere. So far as their 
religious and educational value is concerned, these narra- 
tives belong essentially to the life and experience not of 
Jesus but of the disciples. Whatever view we take of 
their historical character, they are a picture of the faith 
of the disciples and a record of their religious experi- 
ences. As the Birth-stories form the introduction, 
so the Resurrection-stories form the conclusion of the 
Life of Jesus both of them primarily pictures of the 
tremendous significance of the Personality of Jesus for 
His disciples. Their proper educational place is as an 
instrument for impressing the supreme value of the per- 
sonality and character of Jesus upon the mind, and the 
impossibility of thinking that death could destroy Him. 
The first and main task of the teacher is through them to 
create and strengthen the convictions that Jesus cannot 
fail to carry through His ideals and purposes, that God 
rules even through death, that Jesus offers a permanent 
spiritual communion with Himself to His disciples and 
that eternal life is in that communion. Before and after 
death He is the same in character, in purpose, in love and 
in power. Whatever there is in these narratives which 
can help the teacher to make these convictions real and 
living, it is His business to use for that purpose. Some 
of these narratives He will not be able to use at all ; some 
He will use as Wonder-stories in early childhood ; and 
some He will use here and elsewhere in trying to make the 
moral and religious experience the inner history of the 
disciples between Calvary and Pentecost real and clear 
to His pupils. 

5 
MORAL AND RELIGIOUS APPRECIATION 

So far, we have been dealing mainly with the historical 
elements of our presentation of Christ for childhood. 
Naturally, we are not teaching the life of Jesus for the 



142 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

sake of the merely external dead facts of history without 
any appreciation of their moral, spiritual and intellectual 
value. We must try to let the facts reveal the spiritual 
values of which Jesus was historically the bearer, but we 
need to be reminded that we cannot expect at this period 
a full and adequate appreciation of these values. There 
must, therefore, always be some subjective element in 
every teacher's attempt to teach the life of Jesus. That 
cannot be avoided and should be frankly recognized. 
Any and every presentation of Christ implies to some 
extent even the particular theological interpretation of 
the teacher Himself. We should, however, honestly try 
to let the facts speak for themselves ; we should try to 
distinguish between the moral and religious appreciation 
which is essential and the theological construction that 
may follow for us ; and we should in any case try to make 
clear to ourselves the main spiritual values which we wish 
deliberately to associate with Jesus in the minds of the 
children. 



LOVE FOR JESUS AND ITS QUALITIES 

All will agree that the first aim of the Christian teacher 
must be to awaken love for Jesus and trust in Him and 
what He represents in so far as a child of nine or ten is 
capable of such an attitude. When, however, we speak 
of love for Jesus, we must remember that if it is to be 
a moral factor strong and healthy and not merely a 
cheap and enervating sentiment, it must be an intelligent 
love. That means to say, it must be generated by and it 
must grow with an increasing knowledge of Jesus. To 
love Jesus means to know Him. It is a moral apprecia- 
tion of Him, of what He is and what He represents to 
some degree or other. 

It must also be a reverent love. That means to say, 
to love Jesus is to love One who stands far above us in 
word and deed, in character and spirit. To love Him 
means to feel His power, to bow to His authority, to obey 
the call of His love. Underneath and behind our love for 
Jesus there must therefore be a realization of His love 
for men to make it intelligent ; and to make it reverent 



THE LIFE OF JESUS FOR CHILDHOOD 143 

there must be some realization of the authority and power 
of His love to the uttermost in the Cross. 



BASED ON THE LOVE OF JESUS 

Naturally, it is only a small part of this end that we 
can hope to achieve through our first presentation of 
Christ to childhood. On the other hand, we must re- 
member that we are now laying down the main conditions 
upon which our ultimate success will largely depend. 
That reveals at once the kind of picture we must try to 
give. It must be one which will discover, though only in 
an elementary way, the main spiritual values which 
became focused in the life and death of Jesus and 
especially the reality and utter generosity of His love. 
It is necessary and inevitable that many different pictures 
of Jesus should be drawn by different hands. One may 
seek chiefly to reveal His beauty, while another enshrines 
His truth and another still His righteousness ; but they 
must all, to be true at all, reveal the sovereignty of His 
redeeming love the sovereignty and the reality of it 
in His spirit, character, deeds and words. His beauty, 
truth and righteousness are closely woven into the pattern 
of His love. 

This, then, is the supreme and first condition of any 
and every effective presentation of the Christ. This also, 
combined with the moral needs, capacities and interests 
of childhood, will suggest the other characteristics of the 
child's life of Christ that we need. 

MORAL FEATURES OF THE BOY'S LIFE OF JESUS 

There can, indeed, be little hesitation as to the 
dominant notes that should ring through the story of 
Jesus in the ear and soul of boyhood. They are heroism 
and courage, the spirit of adventure and the spirit of 
joy. When the highest love takes up the harp of life, 
these are the chords it strikes. It is true that it is in 
adolescence that this love will come to its own com- 
pletely and decisively, but the heroic, adventurous and 
joyful elements that wait upon it to do its bidding must 



144 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

be there to welcome it when it comes in its glory. It is 
the moral heroism of the faith of Jesus that needs most 
emphasis and illustration now, and there is a wealth of 
material in the Gospels for the purpose. 

It ought also to be clear that our picture of Jesus for 
this period should be frankly and thoroughly human- 
full of genuine human experiences, of struggle, tempta- 
tion and growth, of doubt and perplexity as well as exulta- 
tion and triumph, representing the ebb and flow of the 
spirit within the steadfast unity of gracious and holy 
purpose. 

This, of course, by no means excludes the growth of a 
wider and deeper appreciation of Jesus later on as the 
bearer of divine values, nor of a fuller theological inter- 
pretation of His person and work. It is the necessary 
foundation and preparation for them, but we must now 
be satisfied with fostering in an elementary form some 
moral and religious interpretation corresponding to the 
needs, capacities and interests of childhood. 

BOOKS 

BLAKE (NORA). Stones of Jesus. (London, " Teachers and Taught.") 
FORBUSH (W. B.). The Boy's Life of Christ. (London : Hodder & 

Stoughton.) 

GILLIE (R. C.).The Story of Stories. (London : A. & C. Black.) 
LEE (HETTY). Lessons on the Life of Our Lord Jesus Christ. (London : 

National Society.) 

NIEBERGALL (F.). Jesus im Unterricht. (Gottingen, 1910.) 
REYNOLDS (F. B.) and WALLER (H. I.). Jesus the Hero. (London, 

"Teachers and Taught.") 



CHAPTER VIII 

THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST FOR 
ADOLESCENCE 

Adolescent Life and its Features. The Decisive Stage in Education 
Adolescence and the New Testament. 

The Literary Study of the New Testament. The Books of the New 
Testament The Need for Educational Editions Three Aspects 
of the Gospels. 

The Character and Teaching of Jesus. Study of Jesus for Adolescence 
Jesus as a Teacher Jesus in Controversy The Jewish Leaders 
Contrasted with Jesus The Moral and Religious Experience 
of Jesus and its Fundamental Features Social Spirit and 
Activity of Jesus. 

Life and Thought of the Primitive Church. The Synoptic Presenta- 
tion as a Whole Relation to the Life of the Primitive Church 
The Origin of the Church and Christian Theology. 

The Synoptic Gospels and Modern Problems. Modern Valuation of 
the Synoptic Presentation Its Relation to Living Issues. 



ADOLESCENT LIFE AND ITS FEATURES 

ADOLESCENCE THE DECISIVE STAGE IN EDUCATION 

IT has already been said in many forms that the cul- 
minating point in our moral and religious instruction 
and education is to be found in adolescence. Then comes 
normally the decisive experience, when the vision and 
the meaning of the spiritual world of which Jesus is the 
supreme revealer flash upon the soul of youth and may 
make or mar his destiny. This may come suddenly or 
gradually. We may call it ' conversion ' or describe it 
by any other name equally unfitting and inadequate. 
In any case, its reality and gravity in some form, as a 
10 



146 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

natural and inevitable feature of healthy adolescence, is 
undoubted. It is a well-known point in any effective 
and successful educational process, and on a small scale 
is an essential factor in every process of learning. In 
Herbartian language, it is the culmination of the process 
of apperception. It is the point at which all the varied 
elements which have somehow found a place in the mind 
become fused into an illuminating unity, acquire living, 
transforming power and enter into control for the time 
being in fact, become educationally effective. 

1 Conversion ' is thus a critical stage a crisis in 
education. Adolescence is its natural home among the 
periods of human growth, though it may sometimes be 
paralleled also in that transition-time between infancy 
and childhood which often anticipates on a smaller scale 
many of the features of adolescence. In many cases 
this experience might rightly be called religious conversion, 
even when the specific religious element is not central. 
It combines in itself three elements, namely, a sense of 
the inadequacy of past experience, an effort to look at 
all things from the new and more unified point of view 
and an element of reverence of all which the religious 
sense of sin, the exercise of prayer and the act of worship 
are the crowning expression. 

Adolescence, then, is the most critical period of human 
growth. It is the time of decision, the age of ideals and 
of the conflict of ideals, the stage of strenuous struggle 
for a higher unity and at the same time it is the age 
of self-assertion and of a keen desire for wider communion 
in larger social groups and communities. It is the flower- 
ing time of love and the period when the sense of personal 
responsibility awakes. 

ADOLESCENCE AND THE NEW TESTAMENT 

Because it is all this, it is also the one great oppor- 
tunity of the New Testament with its Gospel of love 
and ideals, of the value of the individual and of personal 
loyalty to Christ, of social service to men and loving trust 
in God the Father. 

So far, we have only been able to prepare the way, 



THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST 147 

in infancy and in childhood, for the understanding of this 
Gospel in its full sense. Now comes the time for the 
presentation of its essential qualities and power, the time 
to make its urgent call ring clear in such a way as to demand 
a decision for or against it. 

The whole material of the New Testament is, therefore, 
here in place its living history and its classic literature, 
its supreme ideals and its highest motives, its ethics, its 
religion and its theology, its epoch-making personalities 
and the community of its saints, its Kingdom of God 
and its crucified, triumphant Saviour. More than all, 
here is the time when all these should be brought to bear 
decisively upon the living issues of the life of modern 
youth. 



THE LITERARY STUDY OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

It is clear, therefore, that a mere literary and historical 
study of the New Testament will not suffice here. It is, 
however, a very necessary preparation for the deeper call 
of the New Testament. Youth is in search of reality, 
and of reliable knowledge too, and as critical of theories 
as he is of conventions. His study of the New Testament 
cannot be too critical in preparation for a keener, fuller 
and more positive appreciation of its personalities, move- 
ments, ideals and forces. 

He will, first of all, study its books the Gospels of 
Mark, Matthew and Luke, the Book of Acts ; and then 
the Letters of Paul ; then Hebrews and the Johannine 
Literature ; and the rest when he finds the time. 

THE LITERATURE OF THE NEW TESTAMENT 

It is to be hoped, however, that he will be able to read 
them all sooner or later in some better and more attrac- 
tive form than our ordinary editions of the Bible, and 
also with some more effective help than the conventional 
commentary. Most modern commentaries seern to have 
been expressly written for the age of senile decay and 



148 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

not for living and growing youth. They plod on doggedly 
from dead phrase to dead idea, evading dexterously most 
of the difficulties of youth and explaining cumbrously 
all that is self-evident or obvious. For purposes of 
educative instruction they are mostly barren and useless, 
and they only interfere with the light that breaks from 
the soul behind the written page. 

We are in urgent need of a series of educational editions 
of the books of the New Testament, with new and intelligible 
translations, which ought to make most of the conven- 
tional commentary needless. We need these as a sub- 
stitute for the usual popular and Sunday-school editions 
which are only the bulkier commentaries in miniature. 
In the religious instruction of youth far too much time 
and energy are spent on details that do not matter, with 
the result that the weightier matters of the Gospel do 
not get the attention which is their due. 

In this chapter we are only concerned with the study 
of the Synoptic Gospels, which must naturally accompany 
the Synoptic presentation of Christ for adolescence. The 
study of the Letters of Paul, his personality, his work 
and his presentation of Christ, and also that of the 
Johannine Literature and type of thought and life, will 
be discussed in later chapters. 

There are three aspects of the study of the Synoptic 
Gospels which ought to form part of the Biblical instruc- 
tion during the periods of early and middle adolescence : 

THREE ASPECTS OF THE GOSPELS 

1 . Each of the Gospels ought to be studied separately, 
but more especially Matthew and Luke, keeping in mind 
particularly their different aims and methods and the 
peculiarities of their several presentations of Christ. 
This should be rather a rapid reading and survey than 
a detailed exegesis. Several readings of the text from 
different points of view are better than a wearisome 
plodding through verse after verse. 

2. There should be a Synoptic study of the three 
Gospels in order to examine the literary and historical 
relation between them, their common basis in Mark, the 



THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST 149 

use by Matthew and Luke of an early collection of the 
Sayings of Jesus, their different methods of selecting, 
arranging and dealing with their material as well as the 
different forms they give to the words of Jesus, all of which 
reveals the peculiar tendencies and interests of each. A 
course of lessons arranged definitely with these ends in 
view would prove an interesting variant of the ordinary 
Biblical instruction, and would provide at the same time 
a good introduction to the third study. 

3. Finally, there should be a critical study of the 
character and history of the Synoptic Gospels literary 
and historical intended to describe more particularly the 
history of the material, from its source in oral tradition 
through early written collections to the present form of 
the Gospels ; also their general literary form and language 
in relation to the language and types of literature extant 
in their time, including the origin, history and purpose of 
such characteristic literary forms as parables, for instance. 



3 
THE CHARACTER AND TEACHING OF JESUS 

This study of books should lead to a more intimate 
and appreciative knowledge of the thought, life and per- 
sonalities of the New Testament ; and the study of the 
Synoptic Gospels should be accompanied or followed by 

1 . An elementary but systematic study of the character 
and teaching of Jesus on the one hand, and on the other 
hand by 

2. A fairly complete consideration of the Synoptic 
presentation of Christ as a whole. 

STUDY OF JESUS FOR ADOLESCENCE 

Provision has already been made during childhood 
for dealing with the more or less external record of the 
Life of Jesus with some necessary indication of the growth 
of His experience and some examples of the characteristic 
content and methods of His teaching. Now towards the 



150 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

end of early adolescence (13-16) come the need and 
opportunity for a fuller description and a deeper apprecia- 
tion of the moral and religious meaning of the life, work 
and character of the Master. This comprises the urgent 
material of the New Testament the material most likely, 
so far as both its content and form are concerned, to 
prepare the will for the great choice that is usually made 
during these years, and also to impel the will to make that 
choice. 

Such a study ought to try to do three things : 

(a) It ought to give some clear description of the main 
elements in the inner life and experience of Jesus His 
sense of the near presence of the Father, His free obedience 
as Son, His intimate personal knowledge of God. 

(b) It ought to describe and illustrate these as revealing 
and expressing themselves in His ' Messianic ' mission and 
His persistent and generous service of men to the utter- 
most sacrifice of the Cross. 

(c) It ought to give a fairly full description of Jesus 
in His threefold teaching capacity in His relation to His 
people in general, to the Pharisees and to His disciples. 



JESUS AS A TEACHER 

For the purposes of this instruction, the dominant 
element in such a course of study should be the religious 
and ethical teaching of Jesus but the teaching in close 
relation to the character and personality on the one hand 
and to the deeds and work of Jesus on the other. It is 
not an abstract discussion that is meant, but an attempt to 
give a living presentation of the historical Jesus, discover- 
ing and revealing the supreme values of the spiritual 
world in spirit, word and deed the word being the clearest 
and most intelligible expression, interpreting both the 
deed and the spirit. We may, therefore, take the section 
on the teaching of Jesus as representative of the whole 
course. 

No study of the Gospels in adolescence could be 
complete without an adequate study of Jesus as a Teacher 
in His methods and principles, including both the form 
and content of His teaching. The form of His teaching is 



THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST 151 

as significant as its content. His parables are so char- 
acteristic that we shall have to give them a separate 
discussion. But His teaching life in the open air, His free 
and genial intercourse with men of all kinds, His intimate 
communion with Nature and the use He made of it, His 
keen observation of men and things, His deep insight 
into ordinary human nature and His sympathy with the 
ordinary work and experiences of men, His respect for 
women and children, His intimate touch and preoccupation 
with individual men, His use of the Synagogue and His 
deep and intimate knowledge of the Old Testament all 
these things are essential to the genius of Jesus, significant 
features of His teaching and its methods and a revelation 
of His whole spirit. They also form the best introduction 
to the content of His teaching for the people in general in 
His parables. 

JESUS IN CONTROVERSY 

For educational purposes at this time, however, the 
most important element in the teaching of Jesus and the 
most valuable feature in the Gospels is represented by 
the controversy with the Pharisees and the other parties 
of the time, for in this conflict of ideals we have the old 
and the new side by side in concrete forms. They are 
presented in dramatic contrast again and again until the 
conflict finds its consummation in the Cross. For the 
effective presentation of an ideal, as for its history and 
preservation, the point at which it enters for the first time 
into a life-and-death struggle with its predecessor in control 
is the most dynamic and the most decisive. It is then 
that its moral value is most clearly revealed and is also 
considerably increased by becoming identified with the 
personality who is its bearer in the conflict. That is why 
the controversy with the Pharisees must be a central 
element in the moral instruction of the adolescent. It is, 
in effect, the most dramatic representation in all history 
of the central struggle of adolescence itself, namely, the 
struggle to grow out of the bondage of the law into the 
freedom of the spirit. It is the destined struggle of youth 
in every generation to burst the bonds of tradition and 
march into a fuller and more independent life. 



152 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

It becomes one of the main tasks of the teacher, there- 
fore, to attempt once more to use the material of the 
Gospels in order to make this struggle real, intelligible and 
urgent to the heart and mind and will of youth. Now it 
is not so much the external course of the controversy 
that he must bend all his intellectual and spiritual energies 
to depict, but its inner meaning, its moral significance, its 
strong contrast of two spiritual worlds, one lower and one 
higher, one a creed outworn, the other a newly born spirit 
of life. The condemnation and death of Jesus at the 
hands of the Jewish authorities do not represent the defeat 
of the new life but its conquest, which is marked by the 
' power of His Resurrection/ 

THE JEWISH LEADERS 

In order to bring out this meaning, the teacher will 
more than ever be called upon to make some effort to 
describe fairly and adequately the main features of the 
Pharisaic Ethic, Religion and Theology on the one hand, 
and on the other hand to make some analysis of the 
consciousness of Jesus. 

He will now find plenty of guidance for both purposes in 
recent literature on the subject. He must, however, try 
to get rid of many of the traditional prejudices against 
the Pharisees, and do justice both to their defects and to 
their merits. There is no need to underestimate the value 
of their contribution to the life and thought of their 
people and the world in order to guard the superiority 
and infinite value of the spirit, attitude, life and 
principles of Jesus. After all, the Pharisees represented 
the cleanest, the most honest, the most earnest and 
conscientious element in the life of their time. Their 
spiritual pride, their narrow nationalism, their rigid 
orthodoxy, their casuistical calculations and their legal- 
istic doctrines were the dark shadows cast by their real 
and deep sense of the absolute validity of the Law as 
God's will, by their consciousness that their people had 
an urgent message from God for the world at large, and 
by their intense desire to protect that message from the 
unholy touch of profane hands. Far better all their 



THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST 153 

earnest narrowness than the merely opportunist, worldly 
and indifferent breadth and shallow culture of the 
Sadducees. Far better their misguided retreat from the 
touch of the world which was the dark shadow cast by 
their dependence upon God alone than the mad, military 
and political ambitions of the Zealots with their faith in 
brute force. 

CONTRASTED WITH JESUS 

Over against all these stands Jesus in direct opposition 
to the Sadducaic opportunist, to the Zealot nationalist, 
to the ascetic Essene, as well as to the exclusive Pharisee 
refusing to become either a mere politician, a reckless 
revolutionary, a useless hermit or a plaster saint. The 
faith and hope and love which kept Him from depen- 
dence on the arm of flesh, delivered Him from the snares 
of political intrigue, gave Him courage also not to flee 
from the world's responsibility and work and saved Him 
from spiritual pride and self-righteous exclusiveness. 
There was really no choice for Jesus between the monastic 
Essene, with more ' holiness ' than usefulness ; the 
Zealot nationalist, with more zeal than sense ; the aristo- 
cratic Sadducee, prouder of his lineage than of his loyalty 
either to his people or to his religion ; and the legal- 
minded Pharisee, fuller of theological lore than of practical 
love. Jesus was great enough to see the good in them all 
and perhaps to learn of them all but also to repudiate 
them all. He had the courage to strike a way of His own. 
He was as wide in His outlook as the Sadducee, but with 
an infinitely greater love for His country and people. He 
was as uncompromising in His conviction and devotion 
to God's will as the Pharisee, but with an infinitely greater 
comprehension and wider tolerance. He was as much a 
man of the people as any Zealot, but with much more 
sanity and balance of mind and with an infinitely longer 
patience. He had as much faith in perfect purity as the 
Essene, but with an infinitely deeper insight into its moral 
quality and spiritual inwardness. 

To explain and enforce these contrasts, the teacher 
for this age must do his utmost to penetrate into the 
innermost secrets of the soul and experience of Jesus. 



154 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

He will, of course, never fully succeed, but he must not 
give up the attempt. He must resist the temptation 
to rest content with superficial phrases and with formal 
descriptions and titles. The freer, the less tied to tradi- 
tional formulae and methods he can be the better will 
he succeed in his purpose. Youth must feel that he is 
groping for realities even if it does not know whether he 
succeeds or fails. His constant failure indeed will be 
educationally more effective than a cheap success. 

THE MORAL AND SPIRITUAL SECRET OF JESUS 

One of his main difficulties will be to interpret the 
Messiahship of Jesus in relation to the national and personal 
ideals of his age. He must try to show that Messiah- 
ship as a burden upon the soul of Jesus rather than an 
external dignity at which He snatched. He must show it, 
too, as the only contemporary form and category which 
His deeper moral and religious experience of Sonship could 
take that and no more. 

It is somewhere in that experience of Sonship that 
the last secret of Jesus lies. The other side of it is the 
Fatherhood of God. Its complement for Him was the 
Brotherhood of man. Love to God and man was therefore 
essential to its nature. Freedom and obedience were at 
one in it. All His virtues were the virtues of this filial 
and brotherly love. They are the truthfulness, the 
gentleness, the courage, the loyalty, the patience, the 
self-control, the wisdom, the justice, the sympathy of 
love. They really do not exist as virtues apart from the 
supremacy of love. The Kingship of God the Father is 
in this love, and it is to be finally incorporated in His 
Kingdom. 

Out of all this also comes His imperative sense of 
vocation and of a divine mission of Saviourhood which 
finds only partial, temporary and inadequate expression 
in the title and office of the Messiah. 

In all this experience are involved the great principles 
of the Gospel and teaching of Jesus the doctrine of the 
Fatherhood, the Brotherhood of man, the value of the 
individual, the supremacy and universality of Love, the 



THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST 155 

moral and religious significance of the Kingdom in the 
universe, as well as the other convictions which make 
Jesus into the unique bearer of a whole new world of 
spiritual values. 

It is along lines such as these that the teacher must 
search for the background, the meaning and the power 
of the contrast with the Pharisees which led through 
conflict to the consummation of the Cross. 



SOCIAL SPIRIT AND ACTIVITY OF JESUS 

The other element in the teaching of Jesus which was 
mentioned, namely, His intimate teaching of the disciples, 
answers to that other prominent feature of adolescence 
which is represented by the group or social interest. 
With childhood the historical has ceased to be narrowly 
individual and biographical and becomes more and more 
social. The great men of adolescence are creators of 
communities, leaders and representatives of groups. 
Jesus must, therefore, be presented in that social 
atmosphere which belongs naturally to Him. Every 
aspect of the life and teaching of Jesus is full of it. His 
fundamental religious experience was that of being one 
of a spiritual family of God the Father with many brothers 
and sisters. The primary ethical expression of that 
experience was Love the essentially social principle- 
finding wider and wider application every day in service 
and self-sacrifice for men. His teaching in the aspects 
already mentioned mirrors all this in its love for the 
open-air life of nature and humanity, in His habitual use 
of the synagogue, in His fight with the Pharisees. 

The one outstanding social activity of Jesus using 
that word strictly in the sense of His activity in creating 
a new community must be associated with His teaching 
of His group of disciples. 

It is true that after His death the definitely social 
inspiration and impetus derived from Him led to the 
formation of the Christian Church. This represents the 
most significant social institution in the history of the 
world ; and it must always form an important element 
in a full presentation of Christ. 



156 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Historically, however, during His lifetime, the com- 
munity actually established by Jesus was not a Church 
but a School. His followers were not Churchmen but 
disciples, and it is that group-movement and the teaching 
associated with it which claims attention and needs 
emphasis in this study of Jesus for adolescence. 



4 
LIFE AND THOUGHT OF THE PRIMITIVE CHURCH 

Such a study as we have now suggested of the character 
and teaching of Jesus seems to represent the kind of moral 
and religious appreciation of His personality which is 
needed some time before adolescence is far advanced. 

THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION AS A WHOLE 

To do full justice, however, to the Synoptic Gospels 
and their presentation of Christ, something more is needed 
than an exegetical, literary and historical study of the 
Gospels themselves, more even than a description of the 
historical person, work and teaching of Jesus. So far, 
what we have been doing is to make use of the material 
of the Gospels in order to describe the facts about Jesus 
and to express that moral and religious appreciation of 
Him which those facts themselves seem to us to imply 
and demand not what they actually meant to the 
writers of the Gospels. 

We saw that all the presentations of Christ in the 
New Testament include in varying proportions not only 
an historical element and a moral and religious apprecia- 
tion, but also a theological construction. So far, this 
third element has found no definite place in our instruc- 
tion. It is, nevertheless, essential to the Synoptic Gospels, 
though it may not take a very prominent place in their 
external structure. It is, after all, their theology that 
provides the categories into which both the historical 
acts and the religious appreciation are put. The theology 



THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST 157 

has also influenced the presentation at least both of facts 
and of their religious interpretation. 

We must, therefore, find room for some account which 
will include the theology in and behind the Gospels in 
our instruction especially since it represents one of the 
three main types of life and thought in the New Testament. 



ITS RELATION TO THE LIFE AND EXPERIENCE OF 
THE PRIMITIVE CHURCH 

We have, then, to seek the most effective method of 
describing the Synoptic presentation of Christ as a whole 
in its meaning, relations and value, in its origin, history 
and influence. 

This is not well done by abstracting anything like a 
theology of the Gospels from a concrete description of 
the life and experience of the early disciples. The 
Synoptic presentation of Christ was a living growth out 
of the experience of the Early Church, and was intimately 
connected with all the rest of its life. Undoubtedly, 
therefore, the proper method of approaching the task 
before us is to describe the life and experience of the 
Early Church as a living social movement with the Synoptic 
presentation as an essential element in it, and indeed as 
its greatest contribution to the history of Christianity. 
The Synoptic Gospels, like the Johannine Literature, are 
not merely the work of individual writers expressing 
individual points of view. They are the expression of a 
typical faith and Matthew, Mark and Luke even in their 
peculiar characteristics represent wide circles in the 
Primitive Church and significant developments of its 
life. 

Our Synoptic studies, therefore, while beginning in 
childhood with a description of the facts of the personal 
life of Jesus and continuing in early adolescence with 
the study of His moral and religious significance, must 
culminate in a religio-social study of the life, faith and 
theology of the early Christian community before adol- 
escence has run its course. For this purpose the early 
chapters of Acts, as well as some elements in Paul's letters, 



158 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

must be employed in addition to the material of the 
Synoptic Gospels. 



THE ORIGIN OF CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY 

This is not an easy study, for it implies an attempt to 
distinguish between the contribution of Jesus Himself 
in the Gospels and the influence of the Primitive Church 
upon the original facts and teaching. It would start 
with the relation of the disciples to Jesus during His 
lifetime and after His death. It would attempt to inter- 
pret the meaning and influence of the Resurrection, follow- 
ing upon the despair of the Crucifixion and leading up to 
the descent of the Holy Spirit. It would try to account 
for the origin of the Christian Church and describe its 
relation to Judaism and to the Law. It would try to 
show how the disciples were led to begin to theologize 
about Jesus, and to describe the main factors which 
decided the character, content and form of that theology 
the influence of the personal life of Jesus, the problem of 
His death, the controversy with the Jews, the influence 
of the Old Testament and of Jewish conceptions. The 
Eschatology with its problems of the Messiah, Son of 
Man, Son of God, and of the Kingdom of God with the 
Parousia, would be an important chapter. Such special 
problems also as the rise of belief in the Virgin Birth 
and the identification of Jesus with the Suffering Servant 
would have to find a place as well as the causes which 
led to the origin of the first Christian literature. 

More than all the personal religious faith and ethics 
of the early disciples and the Church, their practical, 
moral and religious motives would require attention. 

The teacher would have to try to show the presenta- 
tion of Christ which lies behind the Synoptic Gospels 
arising under and out of all these conditions and influences, 
and also show the different specific forms it takes in the 
separate Gospels the historical emphasis of Mark, the 
anti-Pharisaism of Matthew, and the social and almost 
communistic tendencies of Luke. 



THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION OF CHRIST 159 

5 

THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS AND MODERN 
PROBLEMS 

Finally, while all this literary and historical teaching 
may be satisfactory so far as the New Testament itself 
is concerned, it certainly can never by itself do full justice 
to the moral and religious needs of youth. It has only 
revealed to him what once has been. History, however 
significant, is after all not religion, which belongs essentially 
to the living present. Youth needs, and must have, a 
faith capable of meeting the needs and problems of to-day 
and to-morrow. It is not enough to show him how the 
Christian faith met the needs of yesterday. 

MODERN VALUATION OF THE SYNOPTIC PRESENTATION 

Our literary and historical study must, therefore, be 
accompanied at every step by a practical interpretation, 
a modern ' translation ' and valuation of every item of 
our instruction. It is well to know the Gospels and the 
Synoptic presentation as one definite interpretation 
or valuation of Christ and the Gospel, expressed in 
terms of the first century ; but it does not really amount 
to moral and religious instruction. It cannot become a 
religious education without some attempt to show its 
permanent value for the task of constructing a modern 
presentation of Christ and the Gospel. 

Such categories as Messiah, the Son of God, the Son 
of Man, the Kingdom of God, the Suffering Servant and 
others are, after all, Jewish terms. It is well to know their 
meaning for their time. This ( language of Canaan ' must, 
however, be translated into modern English, and the 
permanent value of such terms must be made clear before 
they can become effective instruments of modern religious 
instruction and education. 

RELATION OF GOSPELS TO LIVING ISSUES 

The emphasis upon the historical Jesus, the use of 
Old Testament prophecy, the stress upon signs and 



160 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

wonders, the place of the Virgin Birth and the central 
significance of the Death and Resurrection in the Synoptic 
presentation, suggest and may give us some help to solve 
such modern problems as the relation between Christianity 
and History, the use and value of the Old Testament 
in religion, the relation between Science and Christianity, 
the meaning and value of life after death and immortality 
all of them urgent and significant questions of religion 
in modern days. 

Such problems as these must have a definite place in 
any complete modern religious instruction, and no teach- 
ing of the New Testament which does not continually 
keep them in mind, and which does not use the material 
of the New Testament as a help in their solution, can be 
satisfactory. Thus only can the New Testament fully 
justify its central place in modern Christian education. 

BOOKS 

BOUSSET (W.). Jesus. (Halle, 1904 ; trans. London, 1908.) 
COAXES (J. R.). The Christ of Revolution. (London, 1920.) 
GLOVER (T. R.). The Jesus of History. (S.C.M., 1917.) Vocation. 

(S.C.M., 1913.) 

GRUBB (E.). Notes on the Life and Teaching of Jesus. (London, 1910.) 
KING (H. C.).The Ethics of Jesus. (New York, 1912.) 
LATHAM (H.). Pastor Pastorum. (Cambridge, 1904.) 
M'FADYEN (J. F.). Jesus and Life. (London, 1917.) 
MICKLEM (N.). The Galilean. (London, 1920.) 
NEUMANN (A.). Jesus. (London, 1920.) 
RASHDALL (H.). Conscience and Christ. (London, 1916.) 
ROBERTSON (J. A.). The Spiritual Pilgrimage of Jesus. (London, 
1917.) 

By an Unknown Disciple. (London, 1919.) The Creed of Christ. 

(London, 1906.) 
SCHRENCK (E. VON). Jesus and His Teaching. (London, 1907.) 

The various handbooks qf the S.C.M. for Study Circles on the 
Teaching of Jesus will be found of great value for all teachers. 
For a systematic arrangement of the text of the Gospels to 
illustrate the teaching of Jesus, see especially : 
HALL (T. C.). The Messages of Jesus. (London, 1901.) 
KENT (F.). The Shorter Bible. (New York, 1918.) 
WEINEL (H.). Jesus. (Berlin, 1912.) 






CHAPTER IX 

TEACHING THE PARABLES 

1. The Nature of the Parables. The New Valuation of the Parables 

The Parables in the Gospels Their Authenticity Their Charac- 
teristics Parable and Allegory. 

2. The Purpose of the Parables. Mistaken Theory of the Evangelists 

The Influence of the Theory Summary. 

3. The Educational Value and Use of the Parables. Their Educative 

Value Progressive Use of the Parables For Small Children 
In the Life of Jesus In Early Adolescence. 

4. Teaching the Parables in Practice. How to Teach the Parables 

The Art of Telling the Stories The Practical Application of the 
Parables 



THE NATURE OF THE PARABLES 

THE NEW VALUATION OF THE PARABLES 

No one will deny that modern Biblical Criticism has 
rendered a very signal service to religion by rescuing the 
Prophets of the Old Testament from the obscurity into 
which they had been cast and showing their fundamental 
importance in the history of Israel and of Christianity. 
It is no less certain that Christian life and thought must 
also acknowledge a somewhat similar debt to recent 
New Testament scholars for delivering the parables of 
Jesus out of the hands of arbitrary methods of interpreta- 
tion and making them available for the purposes of 
Biblical and religious education. So arbitrary were those 
methods that it had become an axiom that the parables 
were not to be used as a primary source of Christian 
teaching, but only as very subordinate helps for the 
purpose of illustration. 
u 



162 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Even Trench takes it for granted that they form only 
" the outer ornamental fringe, but not the main texture " l 
where the teaching of Jesus is concerned. By this time, 
however, we have reached a stage when it is felt that 
not only are the parables the most characteristic part of 
the teaching of Jesus, but the most reliable evidence for 
the main features of that teaching as soon as a scientific 
method of interpreting them is adopted. The recent 
studies of Jiilicher, Bugge, Weinel and Fiebig combined 
have now placed the parables in their own proper position, 
and for the first time have made it possible to use them 
effectively in the work of religious instruction. Instead 
of being looked upon as riddles and elaborate allegories 
meant to ' half-conceal ' the truth, most of them at least 
are seen to be transparent explanations of some of the 
most important truths of the Gospel, mirrors in which 
some of the most fundamental features of the inner 
personal life of Jesus can most plainly be seen. Their 
general meaning and purpose have now been made plainer 
than ever before in the history of the Christian Church ; 
and it has become one of the urgent tasks of the Christian 
teacher to make more systematic use of the parables for 
Christian instruction in the light of this modern study. 
To do that he must first of all get a fairly clear idea of the 
results of this recent study with regard to the purpose 
and place of the parabolic element in the teaching of Jesus ; 
and also of the methods by which the parables can be 
taught. 

It is evident that one of the deepest impressions made 
upon the minds of His hearers by the teaching of Jesus 
was that it was very different from that of the Scribes, 
and that this impression was connected with His use 
of parables. The first meaning of this difference, of 
course, is to be found not in the mere form or method 
of the teaching, but in the freshness and independence 
of its content. His was not an elaborate exegesis of 
texts, nor was it an array of traditional authorities, but 
an outpouring of the contents of His own soul in a limpid 
stream. The Hebrew Maschal in all its variety of proverb, 
paradox, metaphor, simile, fable, riddle and allegory was 

1 Notes on the Parables, p. 39 (1858). 



TEACHING THE PARABLES 163 

probably more or less familiar to the people as part of 
both the Old Testament and the Rabbinic teaching of 
school and synagogue. What Jesus did was not to invent 
unheard-of methods of teaching, but to choose the most 
popular and effective of the old. These, however, he 
made new by filling them with the freshness of His own 
personality. It is quite possible that He may even have 
borrowed now and then something more than the general 
forms of His teaching from the Rabbis ; but if so, what 
He borrowed certainly became a new thing in His hands. 
There are some Rabbinic sayings and parables that bear 
a very close resemblance to some sections of the Gospels. 
In real meaning and spirit, however, they are as different 
as the moral message of Jesus is from the legalism of 
Judaism. 

THE PARABLES IN THE GOSPELS 

What we have now to do, however, is not to trace the 
origin and history of the parabolic method, but to study 
the parables of Jesus as subject-matter for Christian 
instruction. 

According to the Synoptic Gospels the teaching of 
Jesus was not only exclusively moral instruction, but it 
was also almost entirely occasional, popular and pictorial 
in form. He spoke always not in abstract but in concrete 
terms in vivid imagery of all kinds. Many times we are 
told generally that Jesus spoke in parables, and most of 
the examples given of His teaching are in parabolic form. 
Three passages are called ' parables ' in all three Gospels 
Matthew, Mark and Luke. Two more are so called in 
Matthew and Mark ; one more in Mark alone ; three in 
Matthew alone ; and eleven in Luke alone. There are 
therefore twenty sections in the Synoptic Gospels which 
are definitely referred to as parables. There are also six 
other passages more or less directly referred to under the 
same name. But it is quite evident that no importance 
is to be attached to the occurrence of the name itself, for 
there are many other passages in the Gospels so similar 
in form and character to the above-mentioned that it is 
impossible to separate them. One writer on the parables 



164 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

includes as many as seventy-nine sections of the Gospels 
under that name, and the number varies in different 
writers from that figure down to thirty. 



AUTHENTICITY OF THE PARABLES 

It is now generally agreed that this parabolic material 
as a whole is the most authentic element in the Gospels. 
The parables generally, that is to say, come in substance 
from Jesus Himself, and they represent the most character- 
istic side both of the form and method of His teaching. 

The only important qualifications made by modern 
scholars to that statement are the two following : 

(a) It must be granted that the Evangelists in record- 
ing many of the parables do not give them in exactly 
their original form the form which Jesus gave to them. 
Generally the changes made are not of any importance. 
In some cases, however, it is held that the meaning has 
become obscure just because the Evangelists have not 
been faithful enough in their record of the words of Jesus. 
Some, indeed, insist that in two or three cases the whole 
meaning of the parable has been changed. 

(b) This last opinion, that two or three of the parables 
have been more or less mutilated by the Evangelists, is 
connected with the fact that many modern critics believe 
that the interpretation given to some of the parables in 
the Gospels is not authentic. It does not represent the 
thought of Jesus. This is the case, it is said, especially 
with regard to the Parables of the Sower and of the Tares. 
The Evangelists have a mistaken idea that the parables 
are allegories in which every detail has a spiritual mean- 
ing. Jesus, on the other hand, it is held, only intended to 
teach one supreme truth through each parable as a whole. 
Other modern critics, while granting that the writers of 
the Gospels may have exaggerated the allegorical element 
in the parables, yet believe that Jesus Himself did now and 
then use the form of Allegory. They therefore say that 
the allegorical character of such parables as those of the 
Sower, the Tares and the Wicked Husbandmen is not 
due to the Evangelists, but to Jesus Himself. This point 
is of importance, as we shall see later on, in so far as it 



TEACHING THE PARABLES 165 

affects the general purpose of the parables. Omitting, 
however, for the moment all consideration of the three 
parables just mentioned, let us see what is the particular 
nature of the others that we find in the Gospels. 

It would seem that the only elements essential to a 
parable in the sense of the Gospels are, in the first place, 
a thought or truth that needs expression or explanation, 
and then the illustration or expression of that truth by 
means of a comparison. The comparison, however, may 
and does take several forms, and we find the word used 
by the Evangelists to cover a variety of comparisons, 
extending from a proverb like " Physician, heal thyself," 
to an allegory like that of the Wicked Husbandmen in 
Mark xii. 

NATURE OF THE PARABLES 

(a) The simplest form is that which may be called the 
Similitude, in which a resemblance is pointed out between 
some general fact in nature or in ordinary life and a 
moral or religious truth. A good example of this kind of 
parable is the saying about God and Mammon. " No 
man can serve two masters : for either he will hate the 
one, and love the other ; or he will hold to the one, and 
despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and Mammon." 
There are at least twenty-eight parables in this form of 
similitudes in the Gospels. 

(b) The comparison may, in the second place, take 
the form of a complete incident, real or imaginary, taken 
from ordinary life. Here something that is done by a 
certain person in definite circumstances is used to illus- 
trate or enforce a moral truth. The best known example 
of this kind of parable is the narrative of the Prodigal 
Son, in which the attitude of God to man is illustrated and 
enforced by a comparison with the attitude of a loving 
father to his son under certain definite circumstances. 
In form and character these narratives are of exactly the 
same kind as those we know as jEsop's Fables, but the 
word ' fable ' has become so identified with stories of 
animals speaking that we cannot use it of these narratives 
of Jesus. Professor Jiilicher therefore suggests that the 
word ' parable * should be used of them in a restricted 



166 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

sense, and considers that there are twenty-one parables 
of this kind in the Gospels. 

(c) There is still another type of parable in the Gospels 
which has been called that of the Illustrative Instance. In 
these the moral truth is enforced and illustrated by giving 
a typical narrative of its application in practical life. 
At least four of the parables of Jesus are of this kind, 
namely, those of the Good Samaritan, the Pharisee and the 
Publican, the Rich Fool and the Rich Man and Lazarus. 

(d) Finally, as has already been mentioned, there are 
three other parables so called, which cannot be classed 
either as Similitudes or Parables in the narrow sense 
(that is, Fables) or Illustrative Instances. These are the 
Parables of the Sower, of the Tares and of the Wicked 
Husbandmen. They differ from the others not only in 
the fact that every detail of them has a meaning and place 
in the message of each parable, but that they have also 
become the subject of much controversy as to how far 
they are to be attributed to Jesus in their present form. 
The subject raises the whole question of the interpreta- 
tion of the parables in general. Their value for Christian 
instruction depends very largely upon that. 



2 
THE PURPOSE OF THE PARABLES 

Why did Jesus speak in parables ? How did He wish 
them to be interpreted ? So far, it has been implied that 
His purpose was simply to explain and enforce His teach- 
ing through them in a popular way, and that He expected 
their meaning and point to be immediately understood. 
At first sight that seems self-evident. 

PURPOSE OF THE PARABLES 

It is only natural to suppose that Jesus in putting His 
teaching into these concrete images is simply following 
the methods of all popular teachers, and is trying to make 
the truth He has to proclaim more easy to understand 



TEACHING THE PARABLES 167 

than it would be in abstract forms. On general grounds, 
the purpose of the parables would need no discussion. 
Everybody would take it for granted that Jesus by this 
means wished to come into closer touch with His hearers. 
Unfortunately, however, the matter cannot be disposed of 
so easily. The Gospels themselves create the difficulty by 
saying that there is a totally different motive at the back 
of the parables of Jesus. In one passage at least they 
describe the Master Himself as explaining the general 
purpose of His use of parables, and the explanation is a 
very strange one. He is represented as saying that His 
object is not to reveal the truth but to hide it. In 
different forms this passage is found in all three Gospels, 
but it is borrowed by Matthew and Luke from Mark. 
In the latter it runs as follows, according to Dr. Moffatt's 
translation : 

" And when He was alone, His associates and the 
Twelve questioned Him about the parables. Then said 
He to them, ' To you is the secret of God's reign given, 
but to those outside everything is imparted by way of 
parables ; that they may see and see, yet not perceive, 
and hear and hear, yet not understand, lest haply they 
should turn again and be forgiven.' ' 

There does not seem to be much possibility of mistaking 
the meaning of these words. They declare quite plainly 
two things : 

1. First of all, they say that Jesus has two kinds of 
teaching, one of which is called ' the secret of God's 
reign ' and the other ' parables.' The former is given to 
the circle of disciples, the latter to the crowd outside. 

2. Secondly, they declare that the purpose of the 
parables is to give the crowds something for eyes and 
ears but nothing that can enter mind and will. This is 
a means of hiding the truth from them to prevent their 
repenting. 

We may try to soften the harshness of this inter- 
pretation, as the other Evangelists have tried to do, but 
we cannot get rid of it. Mark is here attributing to Jesus 
a view of the parables that makes them the means of 
concealing the truth. 

The question is, Can this theory be adopted in view 



168 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

of everything else that we know about Jesus and the 
parables ? It is universally agreed that we cannot, and 
that for several reasons. 



MISTAKEN THEORY OF THE EVANGELISTS 

In the first place, even the Evangelists themselves 
do not adhere to it. It has had some effect, it is true, 
upon the form they give to some of the parables, but now 
and then they represent Jesus as using expressions which 
contradict the theory. For instance, in introducing one 
parable, He says : " Hear Me all of you and understand/ 1 
taking it for granted that He can make the truth plain 
to them by means of a parable (Mark vii. 14). He is also 
surprised when they do not understand. 

In the second place, many of the parables themselves 
contradict the theory. So far from hiding the truth 
from the people are they, that no better instances can be 
given of a truth made absolutely plain. Who could miss 
the message of the Good Samaritan, the Prodigal Son and 
the Hidden Treasure ? 

In the third place, such a theory is contradicted by 
the whole character of Jesus as described by the Evangel- 
ists. He saw in ' teaching/ ' preaching/ ' seeking the 
lost/ the mission of His life, and He was not the one to 
mock the helplessness of the crowd. It is impossible 
to think of Him as speaking in parables with the object 
of not being understood. 

We are forced to say either that the Evangelists have 
seriously misreported the words of Jesus on this matter, 
or that they are putting their own later and mistaken 
interpretation of the parables into the mouth of Jesus, 
and that He Himself never had occasion to discuss His 
purpose in using them. In any case, we can do nothing 
with this mistaken theory of the Evangelists, for it does 
serious injustice both to the parables themselves and to 
the character of Jesus. He certainly did not spend His 
time so largely in propounding riddles and weaving 
elaborate allegories. Such an idea could only arise after 
His death. The disciples had then to explain the fact 
that the Jews refused to accept Him as the Messiah, 



TEACHING THE PARABLES 169 

and they fell back, in this as in other cases, upon the 
theory that they were ' predestined ' not to understand. 
They gave the same explanation of His betrayal by 
Judas. 

Once this mistaken interpretation has been cleared 
out of the way, however, we are left only with the natural 
explanation that Jesus used parables because He found 
that he could make His teaching plainer and more con- 
vincing through them. We gain nothing by trying, as 
many do, to combine some form of the theory of the 
Evangelists with this. To say that Jesus intended to 
half-conceal and half-reveal the truth in parables, is to 
say that He was at cross-purposes with Himself, without 
either saving the accuracy of the Evangelists or doing 
justice to the sublime simplicity of the majority of the 
parables. 

INFLUENCE OF THE THEORY 

But then, if it was the purpose of the parables to 
explain and enforce the thought of Jesus, why is it that 
some of them are so difficult of interpretation ? The 
meaning of most of them is perfectly clear, and their 
point cannot well be missed. When that is not the case, 
there is always a definite reason for the apparent obscurity. 
It is a defect in their transmission. Some are given by 
the Evangelists only in a fragmentary form, and probably 
almost always in a more or less shortened form. The 
situation and context in which they were spoken were 
forgotten. 

Sometimes, too, the theory of the Evangelists has 
affected the original form of the parable. It must be 
remembered also that the life to which Jesus appeals is 
not so familiar to us as it was to the people who listened 
to Jesus. 

All our difficulties in interpreting the parables arise 
from these causes difficulties that had no existence at 
the time they were spoken. As they came from the lips 
of the great Teacher, they formed the clearest and most 
convincing part of His teaching. 

It is the business of the modern Christian teacher to 
revive in the minds of his pupils something of their fresh- 



170 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

ness and of the impression they made upon those who 
first heard them. 

SUMMARY 

In the preceding discussion, emphasis has been laid 
upon the following points with regard to the parables in 
the Synoptic Gospels : 

1 . That the parabolic teaching was the most character- 
istic element in the teaching of Jesus, and that it made 
a deep impression of freshness and originality upon His 
hearers. " The common people heard Him gladly." 

2. That these parables are essentially concrete illustra- 
tions from ordinary life, used by Jesus in order to make 
His message more effective than it would otherwise be. 
They are not elaborate allegories in which every detail 
has a hidden meaning, but familiar similes and narratives 
which culminate in one special point. That point Jesus 
wishes to emphasize in order to express and confirm a 
moral truth or a moral duty. 

3. That in the Gospels we generally get these parables 
themselves in substance very much in the form given to 
them by Jesus. Sometimes, however, we have only a 
summary. The circumstances in which they were spoken 
have not always been preserved for us in the Gospels. 
Sometimes also, owing to a mistaken theory held by the 
Evangelists with regard to the nature of the parables as 
intended to hide the truth from the people, an incorrect 
interpretation has been given in the Gospels. Even while 
they give us the parables themselves in their original form, 
they sometimes add their own comments, and these are 
not always consistent with the purpose of Jesus. 

This last feature is really the main difficulty with which 
the teacher has to contend when he is using the parables 
in religious instruction. If the reports of the Gospels 
were not often fragmentary, and if they did not so often 
omit to state the exact circumstances in which each 
parable was spoken, the teacher would find his task a 
much easier one. His work is complicated by the need of 
supplying for the child what is missing in the Gospels. 

These being the facts with regard to the parables 
and their transmission, it is clear that the general task of 



TEACHING THE PARABLES 171 

the teacher in connection with them is to use them each 
and all in such a way as to reproduce something of the 
clear impression which they made upon the minds of the 
people who first listened to them. This cannot be done 
simply by reading a parable from the Gospels and making 
moral and religious comments upon each detail. That 
is the only method still commonly adopted, and it destroys 
the freshness of the parabolic teaching. 

In order to prepare the way for making the most 
effective use of the parables in Christian instruction, it 
may, therefore, be useful to enter upon a somewhat 
detailed and educational discussion. 



3 
THE EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF THE PARABLES 

That the fundamental significance of the parables of 
Jesus is educational may easily be realized. They provide 
us, indeed, with the most direct educative material in the 
New Testament. They were created by the greatest of 
all Teachers expressly for the purpose of moral and 
religious education and instruction. That is largely why 
the great educators have returned again and again to the 
teaching methods of Jesus for inspiration and guidance. 
Here, if anywhere, the Christian teacher can learn how 
and what to teach. It might almost be said that the use 
we make of the parables in education is the best test of 
whether and how far the spirit of Jesus and the Christian 
Gospel has obtained a firm grip of our instruction. 

EDUCATIVE VALUE OF THE PARABLES 

Moreover, their use by Jesus Himself will enable us 
to see just at what point in religious growth the parables 
are most likely to exercise their full weight of influence in 
education. Evidently they seemed to Jesus to provide 
the most likely means of effecting the transition from an 
external and objective stage of development to a more 
internal and subjective period represented in His 



172 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

historical circumstances by the transition from the 
morality of outward observance and Law to that of dis- 
position, love and freedom. In a word, and using the terms 
of individual and educational psychology, we are at the 
end of childhood and the beginning of adolescence. And 
there is no doubt that every educational consideration 
points to the fact that it is here that the most fruitful 
teaching of the parables of Jesus both as regards sub- 
stance and method is in its proper place. It does not 
follow that their material cannot be used at any other 
time, but it will only be for some subsidiary purpose 
and in some subsidiary way. Earlier than towards the 
end of childhood, we can only prepare the way for a full 
teaching of them, and that in a fragmentary manner. 
Later than early adolescence, we can only elaborate and 
systematize their teaching. Their full educative oppor- 
tunity conies once and for all in late childhood or in 
early adolescence. It is then that their inherent power 
to influence the process of moral growth will tell decisively. 

PROGRESSIVE USE OF THE PARABLES 

Guided also by the literary, historical, ethical and 
religious significance of the parables as they are found in 
the Gospels, it will not be a difficult task for the teacher 
to decide when, in what form and for what purpose each 
parable should be used in instruction. 



FOR SMALL CHILDREN 

In the first place, some of the parables of Jesus are 
such consummate examples of the art of story-telling, 
illustrative of elementary moral virtues, that their use 
cannot well be avoided in the instruction of children even 
before they pass out of their infancy. At this time, of 
course, they would be used not as part of the deepest 
religious teaching of Jesus nor even definitely as parables 
in their original context. They would be used simply as 
independent narratives, valuable in and for themselves, 
forming part of a collection of interesting individual 
stories suitable for the instruction of children under eight 



TEACHING THE PARABLES 173 

years of age. There are some of them that require 
practically no change at all in order to adapt them for 
this purpose. Their Biblical form is so complete in detail, 
so transparent, as to be easily intelligible as stories even 
to the smallest child. Such, for instance, are the stories 
of the Good Samaritan and of the Loving Father (which 
would be a better title for this purpose than the Prodigal 
Son). The former would be told simply as an instance of 
unselfish kindness by a stranger, and the latter as one of 
a father's generous love. 

There are others that would require more elaboration 
of their detail in order to make them effective for small 
children. The teacher, however, need not hesitate about 
filling out their detail so long as he is faithful to their 
essential meaning, for it is very probable that Jesus 
Himself gave them originally in a much fuller form than 
the one we now find in the Gospels. In this way the 
story of the Shepherd and the Lost Sheep might be used 
as an illustration of care for animals and kindness to them. 
To this a companion story might be made out of the 
Parable of the Good Shepherd. This, of course, is not 
the main purpose of these parables, but it is quite in their 
spirit and in the spirit of Jesus, while it only requires 
an easy elaboration of their details to make them very 
effective for this end. 



IN THE LIFE OF JESUS 

There is also another aspect of the parables which 
has not yet had the attention it deserves even in the 
scientific study of Jesus and the Gospels. They are not 
only the supreme examples of the art of teaching as 
practised by Him, but many of them have also a unique 
psychological value. They not only explain the truths 
He preached and enforce the demands He made, but they 
often also cast a welcome light backwards upon the history 
of His inner life and His personal experiences and interests. 
After all, every man spontaneously turns to that part 
of life and the world in which he is most interested and 
of which he has the fullest knowledge, for his aptest 
illustrations. It is, therefore, not without significance 



174 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

that almost half the figures, illustrations and metaphors 
used by Jesus are taken direct from the common open- 
air life of nature around Him, and almost the other half 
from the details of the ordinary daily occupations of the 
men among whom He lived. There is scarcely an ordinary 
calling known to His time and country which He does 
not use in a spontaneous way in order to explain and 
enforce His Gospel. That at once stamps Him and 
reveals Him as a lover of Nature and of ordinary men 
a soul rejoicing in the open air of the world's life, and a 
sympathetic sharer in men's ordinary experiences, with a 
human interest in their daily work and their children's 
play. 

More than that, even, there is every reason to think 
that some of the parables have sprung directly out of 
particular moral experiences in the personal life of Jesus 
Himself, and in that sense are ' human documents ' of 
supreme value. 

IN LATE CHILDHOOD 

It seems to follow that some of the parables must 
naturally find a place when sometime between the ages of 
nine and twelve we should try (as we have already seen) 
to give a picture of the personal life and activity of Jesus . 
In order to make His life real, we must include some 
pictures of Him as a teacher, and we cannot do better 
than give some concrete instances of how He taught the 
people in parables. Here and there in the sketch of His 
life when He is described as teaching in the Synagogue, 
or walking with His disciples or conversing with in- 
dividuals or preaching to the crowd one or more of the 
parables might well be introduced into His conversation 
or address. The main object of this, of course, would be 
to give a real picture of Jesus Himself, and the parables 
chosen would therefore be those that cast some light 
backwards upon His own life or that can be most easily 
inserted into definite situations in the general narrative. 

The Parable of the Treasure would fit admirably into 
the early days of the ministry, and find a background as 
well as an application in the life of Jesus and His disciples, 



TEACHING THE PARABLES 175 

sacrificing home and friends for the sake of the Kingdom. 
The Parable of the Sower finds a natural background 
when Jesus sends out His disciples on their mission 
through Galilee, making them realize what He Himself had 
already realized in His own experience, namely, the variety 
of the results to be expected. 

In the same way some of the other parables may be 
inserted at different points into the narrative of the life in 
such a way as to illustrate very vividly the experience 
through which Jesus and His disciples must have been 
passing at that very time. The teacher will find it an 
interesting work to seek for a suitable background in the 
life of Jesus for such parables as are simply grouped 
together without a context in the thirteenth chapter of 
Matthew. 

IN EARLY ADOLESCENCE 

So far, however, we have only been introducing the 
parables into the curriculum in a more or less subsidiary 
way. As we have seen, the great opportunity for any 
adequate teaching of the parables of Jesus in their full 
significance as expressing His fundamental principles 
and enforcing His most urgent moral demands, comes 
at the end of the period of late childhood or in early 
adolescence. At this time the children are developing 
very rapidly their powers of independent thought, and 
some elementary lessons on the parables will help to 
link the concrete narratives of childhood with the more 
definitely intellectual instruction that must begin with 
adolescence. 

Two methods of dealing with the parabolic teaching 
are here in place. At about twelve or thirteen years of 
age a special series of lessons on the main parables, chosen 
for their particular ethical or religious significance, might 
be given. A good introduction for such a series would be 
a few lessons on the life of Jesus in the open air, His 
accurate observation and love of nature as well as His 
interest in the ordinary life and work of men. Then the 
general purpose of parables would be explained, and finally 
a selection of the simplest parables dealt with one by 
one. This selection would certainly include those of the 



176 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Good Samaritan, the Prodigal Son, the Lost Sheep, the 
Pharisee and the Publican, the Servants entrusted with 
Money, the House built on the Rock, the Mustard Seed, 
the Treasure and the Pearl. 

Finally, somewhat later in adolescence, an attempt 
must be made to deal, as we have seen, with the whole 
subject of the teaching of Jesus more systematically. 
Undoubtedly, the best introduction to such a sketch and 
the best summary of the teaching of Jesus will be found 
in a consideration of the parables. 

Naturally it is not contended that all these sug- 
gestions for making use of the parables should be rigidly 
included in every curriculum. The discussion is only 
intended to reveal the many opportunities there are in 
modern education to make much fuller use of this material, 
and in a more effective way than has so far been made. 
The method of dealing with the parables wherever and 
whenever introduced needs careful consideration, and some 
discussion of that subject here will not be out of place. 



4 
TEACHING THE PARABLES IN PRACTICE 

How TO TEACH THE PARABLES 

It has already been said that the general task of the 
Christian teacher with regard to the parables is to use 
each one of them in such a way as to reproduce something 
of the fresh impression which it made upon the minds 
of the people who first listened to it. How, then, is the 
teacher to approach his task with that end in view ? 
In the first place, he must study the record of each parable 
so that the one special point emphasized in the story 
may become perfectly clear to him. In most cases a 
careful reading of the story is enough to show what that 
is. In the story of the Hidden Treasure, for instance, the 
point evidently is the decision to give up every possession 
which the man has in order to gain the more valuable 



TEACHING THE PARABLES 177 

treasure. In the story of the Prodigal Son it is the 
father's overflowing love, bent upon forgiveness in spite 
of all obstacles. The main point of the story of the 
Servants entrusted with Money by their master is that 
every possession implies a duty the extent of the duty 
depending on the extent of the privilege. Of course, if the 
point itself of each story is not perfectly clear, it is useless 
trying to explain or enforce a moral truth or a moral 
duty through it. 



THE ART OF STORY-TELLING 

The next step for the teacher will be to tell the story 
in such a way as to bring out the point in the telling 
itself. If he wishes to do any kind of justice to the 
method of Jesus he must cultivate the art of story-telling. 
He must try to make the story appeal as a whole directly 
to the imagination and reason of the class without any 
explanation. He must remember that he is dealing 
primarily with children who require a fuller and more 
picturesque narrative than is generally given in the Gospels. 
So in many cases he must be bold enough to use his 
imagination in filling out the details and making a com- 
plete story out of the outline in the Gospels always 
taking care, of course, not to obscure the main point. 
The test of the good teacher is his power of expanding 
the brief form which he finds in the Gospels in such a 
way as to make the child realize the force of the main 
point without the need of explaining it to him in so many 
words. 

The details of the story are not of any independent 
value. Their purpose is to make the whole story natural 
and interesting, serving always to make its point more 
convincing. The story of the Hidden Treasure, for 
instance, will not appeal to the child in the brief form given 
to it by the Evangelist. The labourer and his master 
to whom the field belongs must enter as actors on the 
scene ; the operations of ' selling all that he hath * and 
of buying the field must be dramatically described ; while 
some definite idea of the value of the treasure and the 
12 



178 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

sacrifice involved in selling the goods must be given by 
describing the digging up of the treasure and enumerating 
some of the precious things the man must sell. 

Filling up the outline by particular descriptions of 
this kind is the only way to produce the needed impres- 
sion upon the child. Merely saying ' he sold all that he 
had ' will not make him realize what is happening, but 
a short, vivid description of the sale of the furniture 
and the break-up of his home would make the situation 
real and the point effective. 

Once the teacher has constructed a narrative of this 
kind and is able to tell it vividly he has laid the foundation 
for the moral truth or duty which he wishes to emphasize. 
As this man was ready and determined to give up the 
good things that he had for the sake of the better so 
Jesus encourages the readiness of men to give up even 
what is good in the moral life for what is better, and the 
better for what is best, though it is not always easy to 
do so. 

APPLYING THE PARABLES 

What is then left for the teacher to do is to apply this 
truth or duty to concrete circumstances. This he can 
do in two ways. He can do so, in the first place, by 
finding such a situation in the life of Jesus as will 
show the parable in action. It will be noticed in Matt, 
xiii. 44-46 that the Parable of the Hidden Treasure is 
simply grouped with others. We are not told when, 
where and for what definite purpose it was spoken. 
We can, however, easily imagine a situation in which it 
might have been used with effect and concretely applied. 
No doubt Jesus was many times brought into close 
touch with some Galilean peasant who was deeply im- 
pressed and troubled by His teaching. The vision of a 
better life had been given to him, but he could not finally 
bring himself to make the sacrifice that was necessary 
in order to realize the new life as his own. There were 
serious difficulties in the way perhaps ties of love or 
comradeship or home or possessions were keeping him 
bound to what he was. What better way of making 






TEACHING THE PARABLES 179 

the message of this parable real than by showing it as 
part of the conversations of Jesus with such a man ? 

The second method of making the application of the 
parable real would be to give concrete instances of men 
and women in history who have given up the good things 
they loved for the sake of the better they had seen. 
Examples might be found even within the experience of 
the child himself when some valuable good thing must 
be sacrificed in order to attain something better. 

In brief, therefore, an effective method of giving a 
lesson on this Parable of the Hidden Treasure would be 
as follows : 

1. A brief description of Jesus giving up home and 
friends for the sake of His work, and of His disciples 
doing the same thing, would form an introduction. 

2. Then a scene in which Jesus is teaching in one of 
the villages of Galilee would be described ; the effect 
upon some one definite person which Jesus notices ; his 
vision of a better life ; his perplexity and the difficulties 
in the way ; his coming to Jesus with his doubts and 
difficulties. 

3. During the conversation Jesus tells him this story 
of the Hidden Treasure for the definite purpose of en- 
couraging him to come to a decision to sacrifice the good 
things which he values for the sake of the better that 
Jesus has to offer. 

4 4- Finally, one or two examples from history might 
be given of people who have faced and made the same 
choice, and the child could be shown that the same ex- 
perience can come into his own life. 

Such a scheme seems to provide an effective method 
of teaching most of the parables, whether they are given 
as part of the life of Jesus or in a series of independent 
lessons. It is only after they have been taught in this 
way that they can be read with profit and commented 
on in the Gospels themselves. 

BOOKS 

BROWNE (L. E.). The Parables of the Gospels in the Light of Modern 

Criticism. (Cambridge, 1913.) 
BRUCE (A. &.).The Parabolic Teaching of Christ. (London, 1887.) 



i8o THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

BUGGE (C. A.). Die Haupt-Parabeln Jesu. (Giessen, 1903.) 

FIEBIG (P.). Die Gleichnisreden Jesu im Lichte der Rabbinischen 

Gleichnisse. (Tubingen, 1912.) 

JULICHER (A.). Die Gleichnisreden Jesu. (Leipzig, 1899.) 
WOODS (E. S.)- Studies in the Parables of Christ. (London : S.C.M., 

1908.) 
ZURHELLEN (ELSE UND OTTO). Wie erzdhlen wir den Kindern die 

biblischen Geschichten ? (Tubingen, 1906.) 



CHAPTER X 

THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 

The Miracles in Christian History and Life. The Modern Situation 
The Educational Value of the Miracles Their Relation to the 
Gospel To Religious Growth To Christian Tradition. 

The Miracles in Early Childhood. The Miraculous Narratives as 
Wonder-Stories Essential Features of Educational Wonder- 
Stories The Miraculous Narratives of the Gospels. 

The Acts of Healing. The Needs of Childhood The Attitude of 
the Teacher The Acts of Healing as Historical Illustration 
of their Use. 

The Use of Legend. Legendary Narratives in the Gospels Illustra- 
tion of their Use Story of the Daughter of Jairus. 

Miracles and the Christian Gospel. The Special Task of the 
Teacher The Religious Significance of the Miracles The Needs 
of Adolescence How they can be Met. 



THE MIRACLES IN CHRISTIAN LIFE AND 
HISTORY 

THE MODERN SITUATION 

THE particular problem to be discussed in this chapter 
is that which concerns the value and place of the miraculous 
narratives of the Gospels in Biblical Instruction, especially 
as it faces the Christian teacher who accepts the verdict 
of modern literary and historical criticism upon these 
narratives. It is probable that he may still be able to 
look upon many of the strange acts of healing which are 
recorded of Jesus as actual facts. It is quite as probable 
that he has already been led to consider many other 
miraculous narratives, either as exaggerated reports of 
natural incidents or as the transformation of sayings 

181 



182 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

and parables into events or as the projection of psycho- 
logical facts into the external world or as being due to 
the influence of Old Testament predictions and narratives. 
While he recognizes that Jesus did possess marvellous 
powers to which it is difficult to set a limit, he is at the 
same time convinced that the sun or the earth never stood 
still, that an ass never spoke human words and that a 
storm was never stilled by a word. 

So he wants to know whether and how he is to go on 
telling these stories not only of Jesus healing the sick, 
but also of Jesus walking on the sea, feeding the thousands 
and raising the dead, as well as stories of His miraculous 
birth and physical resurrection. He believes them to be 
legendary in character. His faith is quite independent 
of them. They are even a burden upon it rather than a 
help to it. 

The first impulse of such a teacher is to throw such 
narratives on one side as worthless, not only for himself, 
but also for the children he is teaching. He has a feeling 
that if he uses them at all he becomes untruthful and some- 
thing of a hypocrite. And when he can persuade himself 
to employ these narratives in his teaching, his constant 
temptation is to rationalize them to reduce them in 
some crude fashion into natural events. 

Such a result would certainly be a very serious 
calamity for moral and religious instruction. It only 
needs, however, some little consideration of this whole 
matter from an educational point of view to lead him 
to a very different conclusion. The question of the value 
and use of these miraculous narratives cannot thus be 
settled in a summary fashion and in bulk, nor is it settled 
simply by the theological or scientific views of adults 
upon the question of miracles. 

EDUCATIONAL VALUE OF THE MIRACLES 

If all the miraculous narratives of the Gospels were 
absolutely historical, it would not follow that they would 
be of any value for the purposes of religious education. 
On the other hand, if they were all absolutely unhistorical, 
they might still be of the utmost importance educationally. 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 183 

At bottom the problem we are dealing with is not 
really theological but educational. Its solution depends 
not so much on the correctness of our theological or 
scientific views as on the educational value of the moral 
content of the narratives. In its turn the educational 
value of these stories depends partly on the general aim 
of our teaching, partly upon the laws and stages of religious 
growth, and partly upon the character and history of the 
stories themselves. 

RELATION TO THE GOSPEL 

1. So far as the general aim of our teaching is con- 
cerned, every Christian teacher would agree that, by the 
time our pupils go out into the world, we ought to have 
transmitted the Christian Gospel to them in such a way 
as to make them realize it first of all, at any rate, as a 
moral force. Their readiness to obey it should not depend 
upon their belief or disbelief in the historical character 
of such a narrative as that of Jesus cursing the fig-tree 
or feeding the multitude with a few loaves and fishes. 
It follows that, whatever may be our methods of dealing 
with the miracles, our teaching should not in the end 
make the interest and the importance of the stories centre 
upon their miraculous elements, but upon any moral 
purpose or message they may contain. 

The impression finally left upon the mind must be 
not that Jesus could work miracles, but that the Jesus 
of whom these stories could be told was such that out of 
His deep love for men He was ready to spend and be 
spent in their service. It is the moral and not the physical 
power of Jesus that belongs to the Gospel. The climax 
of the teaching must be to put the miracles in their proper 
relation to the Christian Gospel and to explain their past 
and present value for the Gospel. It is here in this last 
stage of our teaching that the difference in scientific and 
theological views comes fully into sight. It is here that 
the origin and value of the miraculous as a whole must 
be discussed. 

2. Apart from our aim, we must also be led in this 
matter by the laws and stages of moral and religious 



184 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

growth. The most evident fact here is that the first 
business of the teacher is to cultivate and guide the sense 
of wonder and the imagination of the child. To be 
effective, religious teaching must in some way make its 
contact with that region. The religious life springs from 
it, and must travel through it before it can take possession 
of the intellect and the will. 

RELATION TO RELIGIOUS GROWTH 

It is also certain that in the earlier years of childhood 
the distinction which we draw between the probable 
and the improbable, even between the possible and the 
impossible, does not exist. There is no problem of 
miracles at any rate so far as degrees of probability are 
concerned. Raising the dead and walking on the sea 
are as easy or as difficult to believe, as real and as true 
to the child, as healing the sick or any other event outside 
the child's ordinary experience. So far as the children 
are concerned, the problem is not whether the story we 
tell contains what may be called a miracle, but whether 
the miracle is of the right kind. Does it grip the imagina- 
tion, and does it grip the imagination in the right way? 
Does it simply glut the imagination to idle satiety, or 
does it employ the imagination in order to reach the mind 
and the will ? It probably ought to be added that the 
adult teacher must not be in too much of a hurry to impress 
his own unimaginative views with regard to the import- 
ance of historical accuracy and the improbability of the 
cruder miraculous narratives upon the mind of the child. 
The child lives in a world of make-believe for a longer 
time than is sometimes imagined. For him there is no 
reason why angels should not want food, why serpents 
and asses should not speak, why axes should not swim, 
and why prophets should not travel in whales. In his 
own due time he will shed that world naturally if only 
we will let him alone and give him a little help only when 
we have found that he is doing so. 

Here, therefore, the views of the teacher as to miracles 
are simply out of court. If he cannot leave his views 
behind him, and enter into the credulous mind of childhood 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 185 

for the time being, he should not attempt to teach children 
at all. Each miraculous narrative must be judged on 
its own merits, and whether we use it or not depends 
upon the character, the motive and effect of the miraculous 
deed. Its marvellous nature is a merit rather than a 
defect if its marvel is of the right kind. 

RELATION TO CHRISTIAN TRADITION 

3. Moreover, the Christian teacher cannot forget that 
the stories of miracles have always been part and parcel 
of the Christian tradition. It is not as if he had a choice 
whether to deal with them or disregard them. The 
latter he simply cannot do, for they are inextricably 
bound up with all the records we have of the life of Jesus 
which must always be the very centre of Christian teach- 
ing. This, indeed, suggests the most serious problem we 
have to deal with. 

There is a point at which historical fact becomes 
necessary for the child, and when he begins to distinguish 
between imagination and history. It is then we are 
bound to give some sort of historical life of Jesus. The 
teacher may then be called upon to speak of legend as 
legend, and at the same time to protect the child from 
thinking that legends and lies are convertible terms. 
He must be able to use miraculous narratives from the 
Gospels because they are an essential element in the 
earliest Christian tradition, and yet at the same time he 
must remain true to his own convictions, and also stand 
guard over the continuity of the child's growth in passing 
from the world of imagination to the world of fact. 

From this brief consideration of the characteristics 
and needs of childhood, the place of miraculous narratives 
in the earliest Christian tradition and the general aim of 
Christian teaching, three questions with regard to the 
miraculous narratives of the Bible emerge : 

1. What is the independent educative value of the 
individual stories used as Wonder-tales in early child 
hood when the imagination must be gripped and employed 
by the teacher in order to reach the will ? 

2. How is the teacher, who ' does not believe in 



i86 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

miracles/ to deal with the stories of miracle in the 
Gospels when in late childhood the historical life of Jesus 
must be told and the difference between facts and legends 
must be recognized ? 

3. How can the whole question of the miraculous be 
discussed during adolescence in such a way as to make 
the origin and character of these narratives as legend and 
folk-poetry plain in such a way also as to show their 
proper relation to the Christian Gospel as well as to 
preserve and emphasize all that is of real value in them ? 

The educational problem of the miraculous narratives 
in each of these forms will be discussed in the following 
sections with the hope of indicating the main lines upon 
which the solution must be sought. 



2 
THE MIRACLES IN EARLY CHILDHOOD 

MIRACULOUS NARRATIVES AS WONDER-TALES 

In early childhood, as has been said, the critical and 
historical question with regard to the miraculous does not 
arise either for the teacher or the child. The strictly 
miraculous narratives will stand on exactly the same level 
as all other marvellous stories which are only outside 
the narrow experience of the child. 

The question for the teacher is not whether a story 
describes a natural event or a miracle, but whether, as a 
whole, it is of such a character as to cultivate the imagina- 
tion in the right way. It is by more or less miraculous 
narratives in the wide sense that this can best be done as 
a rule. It does not, however, follow that every story of 
1 miracle f in the Bible is suitable for the purpose. The 
teacher is in need of single Wonder-stories, complete in 
themselves, and each one must fulfil certain conditions, 
moral and educational, before he can use them with a 
good conscience at this period. He cannot, therefore, 
consider the miraculous narratives of the Bible in such a 
way as to accept or reject them en bloc. 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 187 

He must rather look at each story independently in 
order to find out whether in spirit, content and form it is 
of such a character as to be available for his purposes. 
As a test for every tale that offers itself, he must have 
in his mind certain conditions upon the fulfilment of which 
alone a story can be admitted into the membership of the 
sacred circle of the pictorial images he must print upon the 
child's imagination. 

ESSENTIAL FEATURES OF WONDER-STORIES 

It will not be very difficult to set forth such con- 
ditions in a series of statements with the confident hope 
that the demands implied in them will at once appear 
reasonable to those who have given any attention to the 
needs of early childhood. 

It is taken for granted, to start with, that every story 
chosen should be told freely to the children and not read 
either by them or by the teacher. Then, every good 
Wonder-story, whether Biblical or not, fit for use in moral 
and religious instruction should bear upon it the following 
marks : 

1 . The story must be of such a character as to appeal 
vividly to the imagination, or it must at least yield to 
imaginative treatment. 

2. The story must not contain anything grossly 
superstitious, and must not, as a rule, call attention to any 
forms of wickedness or sin that are not already familiar to 
the child. At least it must be possible easily to eliminate 
such features if they are present without spoiling the 
story. 

3 . The mere marvel or miracle must not be the only or 
the main point of interest in the story. 

4. Incidentally or otherwise, the story must be such as 
is capable of expressing a moral action. It must, that is, 
contain or lend itself easily to conveying something of 
positive moral value a moral quality that stands in some 
actual relation to the child's life. 

5. The story must be such as can be put into more or 
less of a psychological form. By this is meant that the 
action must be such as can be connected with the simpler 



i88 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

working of the mind. We must be able to make the 
child follow not only the external action, but also some of 
the more elementary thoughts and feelings of the actors 
in the drama. The purpose and the effect of the action 
must become more or less clear. Probably, therefore, God 
should not appear much as a direct actor on the stage. 
He must rather be the background and atmosphere of 
every tale the hidden but real inspiration of the human 
drama. As God works in history, so we should give an 
impression of His working in instruction mediated 
through the deeds of religious personalities. 

If these conditions are fulfilled in a Wonder-story, then 
it might be said that the more marvellous and miraculous 
the narrative, the better it suits our purpose at this stage. 
That means to say that the greater or less degree of 
historical probability a story possesses is not a matter of 
much consequence compared with the fulfilment of the 
foregoing conditions. 



MIRACULOUS NARRATIVES OF THE GOSPELS 

The Christian teacher, therefore, must ask how many 
of the miraculous narratives of the Bible do actually or 
can easily be made to conform to this standard ? As a 
matter of fact, probably few or none of them are quite 
suitable for children between six and eight years of age 
in exactly their present Biblical forms. On the other 
hand, there are many of them that can more or less easily 
be adapted for this purpose. The changes required will 
naturally vary with each story. Some, for instance, 
like the stories of the birth and childhood of Jesus, need 
only a few changes in form, setting and language in 
order to make them ideal Wonder-stories. As much as 
possible of the charm of the quaint language of the Bible 
should be retained, though something of it must inevitably 
be lost in the attempt to avoid words that need explana- 
tion in the case of children of this age. That will always 
be the case whenever we tell any Biblical stories in early 
childhood. 

There are other stories, such as the ' Stilling of the 
Storm ' and ' The Feeding of the Multitude/ which 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 189 

require more radical changes before the above conditions 
are fulfilled. In spirit and general content they will 
suit our purpose well enough ; but, as they are told in 
the Gospels, it is probable that they would miss their aim 
in the case of the children. There is a danger that the 
interest would become concentrated upon the mere 
miracle rather than upon the sympathy of Jesus and His 
goodness of heart. The moral quality cannot be impressed 
upon the mind by simply pointing it out at the end. It 
must be woven with the thread of the whole tale, so that 
the children may feel, even without being told, that Jesus 
loved to help men, or that Jesus was too good a man 
to be afraid of a storm, instead of merely thinking that 
Jesus could work miracles. Thus, in the story of the 
Storm at Sea, for instance, all the art of the story-teller 
would be employed in making an effective contrast 
between the deep peace of Jesus and the restless agony 
of the terror-stricken disciples. This, for young children 
at any rate, is not effectively done by the words ' He slept,' 
and ( Lord, help us, we perish,' which, of course, do the 
work thoroughly for adults who read the story. For 
children, it must be further and more fully illustrated by 
some description of the scenes on board that must have 
led up to these words. 

There are, of course, other miraculous narratives in the 
Gospels which it would be very difficult, if not impossible, 
to adapt as Wonder-stories without destroying them 
altogether. Such, for instance, are the stories of the 
Resurrection and the Ascension, Cursing the Fig-tree, the 
Raising of Lazarus and many others. It may be possible 
to use them later on in another way, but here, at any rate, 
they seem to be out of the question. 

Probably the result of a fuller consideration of the 
miraculous narratives of the Gospels would be the making 
of a good selection of them for use as Wonder-tales to be 
told in a fuller and more or less different form not with 
a view to eliminating the miracle, but in order to make 
them conform to the conditions which have been mentioned. 
In such a selection would be included the Christmas 
Stories, the Stilling of the Storm, Walking on the Sea, 
Feeding the Multitude, Raising the Widow's Son, Healing 



THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

the Epileptic Boy and others. In each case it will be 
the work of the teacher to read the story over carefully 
and to ask himself whether and how each can be retold 
in such a form as to grip the imagination, while at the 
same time making the mere exercise of miraculous power 
subservient to any good moral purpose, and showing 
the movement of the minds of the characters as well as 
the external action. 

All this, of course, means more work for the teacher, 
who will, however, find his reward in more effective 
teaching. 

3 
THE ACTS OF HEALING 

So far the question of literary and historical criticism 
has not arisen in any acute form either for teacher or 
scholar. All the teaching takes the form of single stories, 
and the value of each miraculous narrative ought to be 
judged by its power to grip the imagination for moral 
and religious ends. 

THE NEEDS OF CHILDHOOD 

After the age of eight or nine, however, the teaching 
must become more connected. The material must be 
grouped and become more historical. It is here that 
connected life-stories of great personalities are in place, 
and the teacher is called upon to give narratives of the 
lives of Moses, David, Paul, and especially to teach the 
life of Jesus as a whole. In most of these biographies 
the question of miracles will have to be faced in some 
form or other, and for many reasons it becomes a rather 
difficult problem in dealing with the life of Jesus. 

The question of the general form which the life of 
Jesus should take for children between the ages of nine 
and twelve or thirteen has already been discussed. At 
first, at any rate, it should be told by the teacher in 
narrative form and not simply read or studied with 
comments in any one of the Gospels. Its main object 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 191 

should be to give the children a concrete and clear picture 
of the life, work and teaching of Jesus as a real human life 
lived among men. In doing this the critical problem 
of what is historical and what is not does not and ought 
not to arise in any definite form for the children. Of 
them the only thing that can in most cases be said is 
that they are beginning to realize in a general way the 
difference between actual facts and the product of the 
imagination. They may at any moment ask whether 
some individual incident is really ' true ' or not, and they 
will not be ready to accept any kind of tale as actual 
fact without question. 

For the teacher, on the other hand, the critical question 
does arise in an aggravated form when he is face to face 
with the task of giving the children some clear if elementary 
picture of what Jesus actually was and said and did. 
It is certainly not his business to discuss critical questions 
in teaching children, but quite as certainly he is bound 
to preserve his own intellectual integrity. He must not 
play fast and loose with the Biblical narratives, nor is 
he justified in simply forcing his own views upon the 
child, whether they are radical or conservative. His own 
views will and must, without doubt, influence the form 
of his narrative, but the value of his narrative in giving 
a picture of Jesus should not depend exclusively upon 
acceptance of his views. 

The real problem, therefore, is how he can remain 
faithful to his own convictions and still not tyrannize 
over either the mind of the child or the Biblical stories. 
It is this problem which becomes urgent for the teacher 
in the case of the miracles of the Gospels. How is he 
going to deal with these narratives in telling the life of 
Jesus to children between nine and twelve years of age ? 

THE ATTITUDE OF THE TEACHER 

The probability is that he has found no reason to 
change his conviction that many of the acts of healing 
recorded in the Gospels are historical facts more especially 
the healing of nervous diseases and some of their physical 
results, such as blindness, deafness and sometimes lame- 



192 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

ness, as well as probably some skin diseases that were at 
that time confused with real leprosy and called by that 
name. He will not be anxious to make the range of 
historical fact a narrow one, believing as he does in the 
unique nature of the personality of Jesus and realizing 
the extraordinary effect such a personality may well 
have had. At the same time, for many reasons, such 
stories as those of Raising the Dead, Walking on the Sea, 
Feeding the Thousands and others of a similar kind will 
almost inevitably have a legendary or only a parabolic 
character for him, though there may be some historical 
elements underlying them. This will be true also of the 
Birth narratives and of most of the Resurrection and 
Ascension stories in their present form, as well as of the 
accounts of the Temptation and the Transfiguration. 

Now, the first thing such a teacher has to do is to 
recognize how closely the miraculous narratives are inter- 
woven with the life, teaching and work of Jesus as 
described in the Gospels. Even if he desired to do so, 
it is impossible for him either to ignore or to eliminate 
them. He is not called upon to include them all in his 
narrative, but a representative selection of them must 
have a place in some form or other. 

MIRACLES OF HEALING 

There will not be much difficulty about the miracles 
of healing. A number of these from the Gospel of Mark 
he can tell as integral parts of the historical life. He can 
thus describe the healing of the madman in the Synagogue 
(i. 22-27), Simon's mother-in-law (i. 29-31), the paralysed 
man (ii. 1-12), the deaf stammerer (vii. 31-37), the 
epileptic boy (ix. 14-29), blind Bartimaeus (x. 46-52) 
and perhaps two or three others. For each he must find 
an appropriate setting, with a view to making them 
intelligible as real experiences for the people present, for 
the persons healed and for Jesus Himself. This setting 
will, as a rule, in outline at least, be found in the Gospels, 
but it does not matter much whether it is really historical 
or simply invented by the evangelist or by the teacher 
for the purpose. Naturally, no attempt should be made 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 193 

to explain the cures in each case, and the common phrase 
' possessed by demons ' must be retained with an ex- 
planation that evil spirits were then supposed to bring 
the diseases. The main effort of the teacher should be 
given to describing the scene, the feelings and words of 
the actors and spectators in such a way as to make an 
impression of the extraordinary effect produced by the 
words, attitude, look and will in fact, of the whole 
personality of Jesus upon other minds and wills. 

It is probable that some legendary elements have crept 
even into these stories of healing, but they are insignificant, 
and in retelling the story the teacher can avoid them very 
easily without interfering with the meaning of the narrative. 

In order to illustrate this method of dealing with the 
acts of healing as part of the life of Jesus, it may be well 
to give one example of its application as it has been worked 
out by Else and Otto Zurhellen. 1 

Let us suppose, then, that in giving a connected narra- 
tive of the life of Jesus we have reached the first day 
of His public activity in Capernaum. In Mark i. 2134 
there is a very brief summary of what happened on that 
day. The cure of the possessed man and of Simon's 
mother-in-law are narrated at some length. Others are 
only referred to, and we are told that " the people were 
greatly struck with the teaching of Jesus, for He was 
teaching them like One who had authority and not like 
the Rabbis." The business of the teacher is to reproduce 
as much as he can of this impression. 

ILLUSTRATION OF THEIR USE 

In order to do that for the children he must give a 
much more concrete picture of the scene than is given in 
Mark. He must tell the story in such a way as to make 
the children re-experience its events with some one who 
saw the whole thing. For that purpose the narrative 
must be given from the point of view of some one who 
saw and felt the effect. Let it be a labourer from one 
of the narrow streets of Capernaum. Give him and all 
the chief actors names. Follow him that Sabbath to 

1 Wie erzdhlen wir den Kindern die Biblischen Geschichten ? (Mohr, 1906.) 
13 



194 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

the Synagogue. Describe the ordinary service there and 
an ordinary address by a Rabbi, as well as the feelings 
of our hearer. Jesus standing up to speak excites 
curiosity as a stranger. Give as His address some of the 
sayings of the Sermon on the Mount and one of His parables, 
making the contrast between it and the preceding address 
as clear and sharp as possible. Then describe the attitude 
and the natural comments of the congregation. The 
address is interrupted by the forced entrance of the 
possessed man who is well known. Describe him briefly, 
and the conversation between him and Jesus, giving 
their attitudes, looks, gestures vividly. Then comes 
the astonishing power of Jesus to calm him, the renewed 
surprise and excitement and the comments : " What a 
man ! " " He has power over evil spirits ! n "A 
miracle ! " (< Did you see how He looked like a king ! " 
" Marvellous ! I never saw anything like it 1 " " Just 
now the words and then the deed ! " The service breaks 
up in the excitement of the cry : " A prophet ! a prophet ! " 
A vivid narrative built on some such lines as these will 
certainly help to make the life of Jesus real to the children 
even. It provides the only setting for the miracles of 
healing, for it is an attempt to reproduce what must 
have been behind the short summaries of the Gospels. 

There will always remain differences of opinion as to 
exactly how many and which of these acts of healing 
can still be accepted and narrated as actual facts and as 
integral parts of the historical life of Jesus. Different 
teachers will probably draw the line at different places. 
In any case, each teacher can only give as actual history 
at this stage those incidents which he considers to be so. 



4 
THE USE OF LEGEND 

LEGENDARY NARRATIVES 

There is a second type of miraculous narrative in the 
Gospels, namely, that of which the raising of the widow's 
son and the feeding of the multitude are representative. 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 195 

Some of these are now interpreted as exaggerations of 
actual incidents, some as due to the influence of Old 
Testament sayings, some as parables transformed into 
events, while the origin of others is obscure. In any case, 
for some reason or other, they are all considered more or 
less legendary in character. 

It must be confessed at the outset that the teacher 
who holds this view is faced by a serious difficulty when 
he tries to tell the life-story of Jesus to children between 
the ages: of nine and twelve or thirteen. It has already 
been pointed out that at an earlier time he can with a 
good conscience put his critical views behind his back 
and use many of these narratives as Wonder-stories, 
absolutely indifferent as to whether they are historical 
or not. At a later period, too, in adolescence he can 
discuss the whole question of the miraculous and legendary 
elements in the Gospels quite frankly with his scholars 
with profit, and with no danger to their reverence for 
Jesus and the New Testament. But in late childhood 
he can do neither the one thing nor the other. For the 
teacher himself, the critical question becomes urgent in 
an acute form. He must have some definite opinion as to 
the character of these narratives. On the other hand, 
he cannot discuss literary and historical questions criti- 
cally with the children. Neither can he give to them as 
history that which seems to him to be either doubtful or 
definitely legendary. What, then, is he to do ? He is not 
justified in simply disregarding such narratives. By so 
doing he would not only fail to reproduce the atmo- 
sphere of the Gospels, but he would also miss some of the 
best concrete illustrations of the teaching and character 
of Jesus. All attempts that have hitherto been made to 
construct a rationalistic life of Jesus in any living way 
have been failures. 

There is also a good deal to be said for the view that 
these narratives should be so dealt with as to leave the 
way open later on either to show their legendary character 
or to defend them as historical. It would not be quite fair 
to shut the door finally upon either of these alternatives. 

So far as one can see the best way out of the difficulty 
is that suggested and taken by Else and Otto Zurhellen 



196 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

in their book on the Bible stories. They describe their 
method as illustrated by the story of the daughter of 
Jairus (which they regard as legendary) as follows : 



ILLUSTRATION OF THEIR USE 

" What, however, we recognize as legend we shall 
narrate also as such. The best method of doing so appears 
to us to be that we should give the legendary material 
as descriptions of the impression which the advent of the 
great personality makes upon men. As in the case of the 
parables, one must invent situations in which we can 
place such a legend so that at the same time the manner 
of its origin becomes plain. Take the following as an 
instance : In a Galilean village it becomes known that 
Jesus is coming to-day. The people gather together on 
the road which enters the village, and wait in groups for 
the famous prophet. The conversation naturally is about 
Him and His wonderful deeds. One tells of His healing a 
lame man in Capernaum. Another insists that there were 
two lame men whom He made whole at the same time. 

" A third does not consider such acts of healing so 
very marvellous ; others had done the same thing, and 
even greater things. He is fiercely contradicted. One 
man who has been standing somewhat on one side notices 
the warm discussion going on, comes nearer and hears 
what they are talking about. ' Shall I tell you/ says he, 
1 what I heard a few days ago at Magdala ? ' He gets 
everybody's attention. Then he tells them the story of 
Jesus and the little daughter of Jairus (Mark v. 21-24, 
35-43) amidst the running comments and exclamations 
of the bystanders in which their feelings, their sympathy, 
their expectation and their astonishment at Jesus find 
utterance. In the midst of the excitement caused by this 
story the cry is raised ' He is coming.' In front of this 
episode we would place the story of the man sick of the 
palsy (Mark ii. 1-12). After it might come the incident 
of the demand for a sign (Matt. xvi. 1-4). Other legendary 
narratives might be introduced in a similar way/' x 

Thus inserted here and there into the framework of 

1 Op. cit. t pp. 198 ff. 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 197 

the life of Jesus, very effective use can undoubtedly be 
made of the more or less legendary narratives of the 
Gospels by the modern teacher. Telling them on these 
lines he can preserve his own intellectual integrity, and at 
the same time do justice to the child and the spirit of the 
Gospels. His narrative will also remain within the region 
of historical probability for it is almost certain that 
such stories were told of Jesus even within His own 
lifetime. Moreover, such a method has the advantage 
of leaving the value and accuracy of such narratives a 
more or less open one for future discussion later on, while 
at the same time it suggests a natural origin for legendary 
additions to the life of Jesus. 

All the stories of miracle cannot, however, be dealt 
with in this way the story of the Gadarene swine, for 
instance, and the cursing of the fig-tree. Only those that 
are quite evidently consistent with the known character of 
Jesus, and either illustrate His teaching or some of His 
personal qualities, should be so employed. The others, 
such as the two mentioned, must be omitted altogether, 
either as inconsistent with our picture of Jesus or as being 
without moral value. 

As good examples of stories which may be told with 
effect in this way one might mention the raising of the 
widow's son, the feeding of the multitude and the healing 
of the lepers. One or two even of those narrated in the 
Gospel of John might be used the wedding feast at Cana 
and the raising of Lazarus, for instance although it 
would probably be better to give these when studying the 
teaching of Jesus by itself later on in adolescence. 



5 
MIRACLES AND THE CHRISTIAN GOSPEL 

THE SPECIAL TASK OF THE TEACHER 

The preceding sections have been devoted to a con- 
sideration of how and when the individual miraculous 
narratives of the Gospels can be used in a positive form 



ig8 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

in the moral and religious teaching of the New Testament. 
When, however, they have been used separately in early 
childhood, and many of them have been included in 
different forms in teaching the Life of Christ in late child- 
hood, we have not by any means finished with the question 
of the miraculous in relation to Biblical instruction. 
We have only indirectly prepared the way for distinguish- 
ing between historical and legendary elements in the 
Bible, and so made it easier for the mind to meet the 
criticism of the miraculous narratives which modern life 
will inevitably bring with it to every growing boy and 
girl more and more so, indeed, as modern education 
becomes more effective and universal. More systematic 
and direct teaching on this question will be needed if 
the growing adolescent mind is to be put into a position 
to meet without unnecessary strain and danger both the 
popular and scientific criticism of the miracles of the Bible. 
It is not the business of the teacher to eliminate the 
supernatural and the miraculous from the Bible and 
Christianity. It is rather to give his pupils a worthy 
conception of the miraculous and the supernatural to 
fit their meaning into the modern view of the world to 
distinguish between the supernatural and the merely 
arbitrary interference with law, between extraordinary 
moral acts and mere displays of power or prodigies. It 
is his business so to describe Christianity and its history 
as to make moral power and not physical miracle its 
centre. His spirit must be that of the words, " Blessed 
are they that have not seen and yet have believed. " It 
is an attitude towards miracles rather than opinions 
about miracles he must strive to fix. He must recognize 
that the belief in miracles represents some religious values 
which he is responsible for preserving. Among the many 
reasons why the miraculous narratives of the New Testa- 
ment have been clung to and are still clung to by many 
people are the following : 

RELIGIOUS SIGNIFICANCE OF MIRACLES 

i. They have become the expression of the central 
religious faith that " we are not shut up in a blind and 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 199 

brutal course of nature." The belief in miracles is an 
attempt on the part of the religious man to express his 
experience that his surroundings can be conquered and 
made to " work together for goodness." As has often 
been pointed out, this experience is felt as if God broke 
through the regular course of nature for his sake that 
is to say, the event has all the appearance of a miracle. 
A mere belief in the miracles of the New Testament alone 
can, however, be neither a satisfactory nor a full expression 
of this feature of the religious life, and of the present 
reality of God's help. 

What the teacher has got to do, therefore, is to accustom 
the mind to feel the reality of God's help in other ways, 
by making the relation to God a personal and moral one 
rather than a physical and material connection. 

2. The New Testament miracles have also become 
intimately connected with precious parts of the Gospel 
and faith in Jesus. They have acquired, in the words of 
Dean Inge, " a sacramental value." l They are, therefore, 
clung to tenaciously, not so much for their own sakes 
as for the sake of the faith of which they have become a 
part. Here, again, in our view, the connection is neither 
necessary nor useful, but a perilous one for the faith. 
But the fact that the connection is made is the reason 
why the shock of criticism imperils the Christian faith 
of many in these days. The Christian teacher must see 
to it that the two do not stand or fall together in the 
case of his pupils. 

He can do so because he has largely in his hands the 
moulding of both the historic and personal faith of the 
child. The connection between the miraculous narratives 
and the reality of God's help on the one hand and the 
value of Christ on the other, has not yet been fixed in 
the mind of the child, and it is our duty to see that it is 
not made in such a way as to make the Christian faith 
dependent upon such narratives as that of the Virgin 
Birth, or the reanimation of the body of Jesus, or the 
walking on the sea. The necessary connection should 
be made exclusively with the moral and religious elements 
of the teaching and personality of Jesus. That is the 

1 Truth and Falsehood in Religion, p. 103. 



200 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

only way to prepare the mind to move freely and in- 
dependently later on amidst the miraculous narratives, 
without danger and with real profit. 



THE NEEDS OF ADOLESCENCE 

The needs of the modern child, therefore, in order 
that he may be prepared to meet the inevitable criticism 
of the miraculous narratives may be summed up as 
follows : 

1 . He needs to be shown the comparative unimport- 
ance of these narratives in relation to the meaning and 
value of the Gospel, Christ and the Bible. 

2. He needs to realize that the modern view of the 
world and the universality of unbreakable laws give more 
rather than less room for Christian faith. 

3. He needs to understand something of the way in 
which miraculous narratives became connected with the 
personality of Jesus as well as the meaning and value which 
they have whether they contain accurate history or not. 

To supply these needs will certainly require systematic 
teaching with regard to miracles at some period, and it 
cannot be postponed to adult age. The boy enters the 
' storm and stress ' period of adolescence generally 
before he is sixteen years of age, and it is then that he 
needs all the help that we can give him to meet his in- 
evitable doubts and perplexities. 

We have already seen that this kind of systematic 
work is neither necessary nor possible, as a rule, during 
the period of childhood. At that time the best that we 
can do is to formulate our teaching in such a way as 
indirectly and unconsciously to wean the mind gradually 
and healthily from its natural and naive credulity. Early 
adolescence then somewhere between the ages of twelve 
and sixteen is the one and natural opportunity for 
undertaking such a task. 

The method adopted for this purpose will probably 
vary with the different types of teachers, and with the 
changing circumstances, but perhaps the following sug- 
gestions for a course of lessons may help the reader to 
work out his own plan : 



THE PROBLEM OF THE MIRACLES 201 

1. Some of the simpler prophetic narratives might be 
studied for instance, some parts of the Book of Jeremiah. 
This would be done with a view to analysing to some 
extent such prophetic phrases as ' God saith/ ' God did/ 
into their psychological and historical elements. They 
include all the natural causes and show the religious form 
in which the Bible describes what we would express by 
saying ' conscience ' or ' insight J or ' thought/ etc. One 
might compare the Biblical report of an event with 
one of Cromwell's reports to Parliament, put one into the 
form of the other and show that Cromwell had as Veal a 
sense of God's guidance as the Biblical writer. 

HOW THEY CAN BE MET 

In this way it can be shown how the Bible passes over 
all the secondary causes, the human instruments and acts, 
the natural events and turns its thoughts directly to the 
divine cause, including everything under God. 

2. A simple sketch might be given of the origin of the 
Gospels not from a literary point of view, but in order 
to show the history of the material. It would start with 
the popular stories told about the Master during His life- 
time, the memories of the disciples and their preaching 
of Jesus these passing from mouth to mouth and sharing 
the fate of all oral traditions, taking different forms 
sometimes twisted, sometimes exaggerated. The say- 
ings would be translated from Aramaic into Greek, and 
some of them written down early for purposes of 
instruction. 

Part of this account would be occupied with explain- 
ing the rise of unhistorical narratives, owing to mis- 
understandings, imperfect memories, influence of the 
belief in the Messiah and the extraordinary impression 
made by the personality of Jesus. The rise of such 
marvellous stories so early might be compared with what 
happened in the case of St. Bernard or St. Francis. It 
should always be made perfectly plain that such stories 
were not deceptions or inventions, but the natural result 
of the greatness of Jesus, the desire to do Him honour and 
the credulity of the age. They are stories of what He 



202 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

might have done, being what He was, gradually turning 
into stories of what He did. 

3. Then, in reading the Gospels, care should be taken 
in discussing each miraculous narrative to show the moral 
and religious ideas which it expresses, while noting frankly 
the possibility or probability of its not being an historical 
event. 

4. Every opportunity should also be taken to note 
the difference between the ancient view of the world and 
the modern one. The idea of possession by demons as the 
ancient account of disease is a good illustration. 

5. Most of all, at this time such a positive sketch of 
the Christian Gospel should be given as will naturally fix 
the impression on the mind that in essence its nature is 
moral and religious, and that the truth of its moral and 
religious content is for us independent of its alleged 
miraculous accompaniments. 

For Books see Chapter XI. 



CHAPTER XI 

THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 

1. The Birth-Stories in Christian Instruction. Christmas and Easter 

The Meaning and Power of Christmas The Character of the 
Biblical Narratives The Birth-Stories in Early Childhood 
How to deal with them As an Introduction to the Life of 
Christ. 

2. The Birth -Stories in Adolescence. The Educational Opportunity 

of Christmas The Religious Value of the Birth-Stories The 
Religious Value and the Physical Miracle. 

3. The Easter Faith. The Easter Message and the Easter Faith The 

Growth of the Easter Faith The Experiences of the Disciples 
Between Calvary and Pentecost The Story of a Great 
Spiritual Struggle. 

4. The Easter Message. The Story of the Empty Grave The Develop- 

ment of the Story In the Synoptic Gospels and in the Gospel 
of Peter The Permanent Faith. 

5. The Ascension in Christian Instruction. The Story in the New 

Testament Its Value for Religion and in Modern Instruction. 



THE BIRTH-STORIES IN CHRISTIAN 
INSTRUCTION 

CHRISTMAS AND EASTER 

MOST of the Protestant denominations of this country 
have almost entirely lost touch with the Church Calendar. 
From the point of view of religious education that is by 
no means all to the good, and it may yet be useful to 
revive some of the historical Church Festivals as the most 
effective points of contact for some of the most important 
elements in Christian Instruction. The only festivals 
that still keep their hold upon the minds of the people 

are Christmas and Easter, and that not because of their 

203 



204 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Christian significance so much as because they fall at 
natural turning-points of the year and have become parts 
of our general life. In connection with them, however, 
religious and Christian ideas can still be easily awakened 
and points of contact can still be found in them for the 
growth of Christian faith and character. Educationally, 
therefore, they still provide an opportunity that ought 
not to be missed. Christianity is essentially an historical 
religion, and these two festivals are bound up with the 
historical personality of Jesus, out of which that religion 
grew. The mere existence of Christmas and Easter in 
our year does undoubtedly of itself serve some of the ends 
of Christian education. Men and women are still moved 
by them more or less consciously in a Christian direction. 
The work of the teacher is to make that movement more 
deliberate and more definite. How can we then ' keep 
the feast ' at the present time most effectively for 
Christian instruction ? How can we make the best use 
of these festivals and what they represent in Christianity 
deliberately for Christian purposes ? The problem is not 
an easy one to solve in these days, when the very facts 
which these festivals are generally supposed to celebrate 
have become doubtful for so many, inside as well as out- 
side the Church. Here we are only concerned with the 
problem in so far as it involves the use and value of the 
narratives of Birth, Resurrection and Ascension in the 
New Testament. What is the value of these narratives 
for the growth of Christian faith, knowledge and character ? 
When and how can they still be used ? 

It is probably the case that the first religious impres- 
sions of most of us are due to some Christmas story or 
other heard through the firelight of some of the dark 
evenings before Christmas. Everything is in the teacher's 
favour at such a time. He finds his pupils in their most 
receptive mood. At such a time we get nearest to what 
may be called a natural and effective education when an 
event like the Christmas Festival inevitably calls forth 
its own inevitable tale. The spirit of the season grips the 
imagination of the world. It has not only a long Christian 
ancestry, but it has grown up, as it were, with the human 
race itself. It is pre-eminently the season of childhood 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 205 

and the flowering time of the imagination the carnival 
of bright illusion. At present, it is the only time in the 
year when the child by right divine can claim to live 
in his own natural wonderland peopled by Father 
Christmas and Santa Claus, by elves and sprites, by 
angels and the Christ-child. 

THE MEANING AND*POWER OF CHRISTMAS 

One of the dangers of modern times is to pluck the 
child out of that world too soon. The modern child is 
in danger of growing old and wise too early. One of the 
things we have to learn in moral and religious education 
is how to feed the imagination properly and effectively. 
For the years of childhood it is there that both morality 
and religion are making a home for themselves. The 
older religious education never cultivated the imagination 
and the sense of wonder because its angels were too 
crassly matter of fact, and its miracles were not numerous 
and wonderful enough. On the other hand, the modern 
theological movement is in danger of making its keen 
sense of historical truthfulness for adults into a barren 
literalism for children, of stunting the best powers of 
childhood and of disparaging the educational value of 
imagination. This does not mean that we must or shall 
tell the same stories in the same way as our fathers and 
mothers did, but it does mean that we must never let 
the opportunity of Christmas pass us by whether in 
school or at home without going through its open door 
into the wonderland beyond with the child's hand in 
our own. And in order to make the best use of the 
opportunity we must be very clear as to the end we have 
in view, the educational value of our material for that 
purpose and the most effective way of using it. 

Can we still use the Christmas stories of the New 
Testament in our religious instruction, knowing what we 
do about their origin and history ? And if we can, how 
many of them, when and in what form ? 

It is indeed true that very little room for doubt has 
been left us with regard to the real nature of these stories. 
They are almost all and almost entirely legendary in 



206 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

character and an expression of faith in Jesus more than 
records of historical facts. There is no more evidence 
for their historical accuracy than there is for the many 
other similar tales told of other heroes in the history of 
religion and thought. Whatever use we make of them, 
it must be with our eyes open to their twofold character. 

In the first place, they are variations and survivals 
in Christianity of the primitive wonderland of religion, 
going back finally, perhaps, to ancient nature-myths of 
man's childhood. Secondly, in the New Testament they 
have been purified and used as attempts to express the 
value of Jesus Christ to the Early Church coming to the 
Christians probably from the Messianic beliefs of Judaism 
and the Greek stories of the Sons of God. 



CHARACTER OF THE NARRATIVES OF CHILDHOOD AND 

BIRTH 

It is impossible here to enter upon any detailed dis- 
cussion of the various literary and historical questions 
connected with these well-known stories. The situation 
seems to be that the first generation of Christians had 
but little interest in the parentage and birthplace of 
Jesus, and there is but little evidence of their thinking 
that there was anything extraordinary about these things. 
Their minds were fully occupied with their intense belief 
in Him as the promised Messiah and His divine value 
for their lives. They made many attempts to explain 
why and how He could have this divine value as their 
Saviour. " He was the Man from Heaven," says Paul ; 
11 He was the Incarnate Word of God," says John ; "He 
received the Holy Ghost at baptism," says Mark ; " His 
glory was not fully revealed till the Resurrection," says 
Peter. These are some of their main ways of expressing 
the divine impression made upon them by Jesus. As 
time went on, however, and they became more fully 
familiar with Greek ideas and stories of ' the Sons of 
God ' and with Messianic predictions and theories, many 
of them also threw the expression of their faith in Jesus 
into the form of Birth-stories suggested by pagan and 
Old Testament legends, purified and moulded for their 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 207 

purpose. These finally culminated in the story of the 
miraculous birth thus tracing back His divine power as 
Saviour to the Incarnation itself and not only to the 
Resurrection, Transfiguration and Baptism. There are, 
of course, several different cycles of Birth-stories in the 
Gospels, and as the poetry of faith they are almost magical 
in their effect. As such no purer or sublimer tribute 
could be paid to the power and majesty of Jesus. In 
no place in the New Testament are we made to see more 
clearly what Jesus must have meant to the Early Church. 
All literary and historical criticism becomes very 
secondary when once we read these stories as first of all 
and most of all pictures reflecting the faith and experience 
of the early Christians. The value of this material for 
the teacher is that it enables him to impress this moral 
and religious value more deeply than ever upon the mind. 
With regard to the educational use to be made of the 
Birth-stories it is hoped that the previous discussions 
of the miraculous and legendary narratives of the Gospels 
has already prepared the mind of the reader for what 
needs to be said. 



THE BIRTH-STORIES IN EARLY CHILDHOOD 

Useful and valuable as the stories of the Birth and 
Childhood may be at other times, there can be little doubt 
that their real and peculiar place in religious instruction 
is to be found at the point where the child is beginning 
to leave infancy for childhood, where he is beginning to 
pass from the world of pure imagination to that of history. 
That means somewhere between his sixth and eighth year. 

It would seem that the natural course of religious 
instruction up to the age of about eight years should 
run somewhat as follows : 

During the earliest years of teaching, the idea of God 
can be present to the mind of the child only as human. 
So, while in answer to the child's questions about the 
moon and the stars, the storm and the wind, we speak 
naturally of God as making them ; yet in the first more 
or less incidental teaching of religion, God must remain 
very much in the background and His elementary moral 



208 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

qualities attributed to a figure nearer to the child's 
experience. Christian tradition and legend have already 
provided us with just such a figure in the Christ-child. 
The needs of the child can, therefore, best be met at this 
time by Nature and Wonder-stories in which the Christ- 
child plays the divine part of protector, friend, helper, 
comforter and adviser. These Christ-child stories in their 
form and content should be somewhat similar to fairy-tales 
with elementary moral motives behind them and in them. 
In any case, whatever may be the kind of instruction 
given in these earliest years, there comes a time when 
the child is ripe for a gradual weaning from Wonderland 
into History, and from the idea of the Christ-child into 
something nearer the Heavenly Father. In instruction 
this represents the need for a connecting link between 
the religious fairy-tale and the historical life of Christ 
which is to follow. For this purpose nothing better has 
yet been discovered than a series of the half-historical, 
half-legendary Wonder-tales of the Bible. The series 
would begin with the Christmas stories of the New 
Testament, in which the figure of the Christ-child appears 
as the gift of the Father. It would continue with such 
stories as those of Elijah, Creation, the Patriarchs from 
the Old Testament and such Wonder-tales of Jesus as 
the Stilling of the Storm, Feeding the Thousands, stories 
of Healing, and finish up with tales of the more historical 
heroes, such as Moses, David and some of the Prophets 
becoming less and less marvellous and legendary, while 
more and more historical and moral. 



HOW TO DEAL WITH THEM 

Every one of these must, of course, be told by the 
teacher in the spirit of the child. He must, for the time 
being, forget the difference between the world of external 
fact and that of the imagination. For the child they are 
both one. He has no conception either of natural law or 
of historical truth. 

This, then, seems to be the proper place and value of 
the Christmas stories at the transition time from infancy 
to childhood from the period of religious fairy-tales to 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 209 

that of religious history. They are the educational 
connecting link between the two preceded by general 
Nature-tales of the Christ-child, who is the substitute for 
God, and followed by heroic stories of men who were the 
instruments of God. 

This is their real home so long as the teacher can 
forget all his negative criticism of them and enter into the 
wonderland of the child. To do anything else is to sacrifice 
the welfare of the child to the exclusive point of view of the 
adult. Many are afraid, even at this age, of the question 
turning up is this really true ? If it does, however, 
what it usually means at this age is a pathetic request for 
more certainty and not for more doubt. In nine cases 
out of ten there need not be much hesitation in saying, 
" Yes, of course, it is true." 

As AN INTRODUCTION TO THE LIFE OF CHRIST 

So far as their form is concerned, the Christmas 
stories should be told fully and almost recklessly at this 
age so far as the use of a trained imagination is concerned. 
Not that the Biblical narratives can be improved upon so 
far as they go, but their language is sometimes above the 
understanding of a child of six ; they leave many things 
unsaid which must be supplied for the child, and they 
consist of several cycles of stories which are inconsistent 
with one another. Certain omissions are also necessary, 
especially so far as the physical miracle is concerned and 
the relations between Joseph and Mary. With these 
modifications the whole material of Matt. i. 19-11. 23 
and Luke i. 5-ii. 40 may be used for Christmas stories. 
This material cannot, without doing violence to it, be 
reduced to one consistent whole which can be narrated 
consecutively. Several cycles of stories can be made 
out of it. To discuss in detail the form and content of 
these cycles of stories would take us too far afield. The 
main point, however, is that the teacher should be able 
to enter fully and freely without any qualms of conscience 
into the wonderland of the child and put his informed and 
trained imagination to work so as to make each incident 
as full of action, mystery and detail as possible. 
14 



210 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

For late childhood also (9-12) the value of the Birth- 
stories will be somewhat similar. As we have already 
seen, some historical account must be given at this period 
of the life and work of Jesus as a whole. These stories 
cannot any longer remain as integral parts of that account . 
The distinction between what is ' true ' and what is not 
' true ' is already sufficiently realized at this age to make 
it necessary for the teacher to mark the difference in some 
way. So far as one can see, the best way out of the 
difficulty is to interpolate these stories in a general intro- 
duction to the life of Jesus, and to use some non-committal 
formula when telling them. This method will serve the 
twofold purpose of distinguishing them from the main 
historical narrative, and also of helping to create the proper 
religious atmosphere for the life which is to follow. 1 



2 

THE BIRTH-STORIES IN ADOLESCENCE 

With regard to the stories of Birth and Childhood in 
the religious education of youth and adults, very little 
need be added. There are probably two or three occa- 
sions on which the teacher will be brought face to face 
with the task of dealing with them at the celebration 
of Christmas and in any study of the Gospels, or in any 
consideration of the typical modern difficulties with 
regard to the Bible and Christianity. 

THE EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY OF CHRISTMAS 

For adolescents the Christmas season should become 
something more than a festival of the Birth of Christ. It 
may fittingly be used to celebrate the birth of Christianity 
as a whole. The Christmas gift is the whole personality 
of Jesus, His life and death, His teaching, work and 
character. It is the best opportunity of the year to im- 
press upon the mind the central place of Jesus Christ in 
the Christian Religion, and to discuss the essential meaning 
of Christianity. This is a subject which, of course, goes 

1 See Chap. VII. passim. 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 211 

to the root of most of our religious and theological troubles. 
The solution of almost every other problem in the thought 
of modern days depends upon the answer which will be 
given to the critical question : What is Christianity ? In 
the teaching of adolescents almost everything depends 
upon the view of the essential nature of Christianity which 
is placed before them. This, of course, is not the place to 
discuss that subject, but only for reminding the reader that 
the Christmas festival in many ways affords the best 
natural opportunity for definitely facing it. 

In this wider interpretation of the educational oppor- 
tunity of the Christmas festival, the New Testament 
stories of the Birth of Christ will take only a subordinate 
part. On almost all hands the subject of the Virgin 
Birth has ceased to count as a factor in the religious 
situation, though it may still be clung to by many as an 
article of belief, and though a frank discussion of it may be 
useful for clarifying ideas with regard to the essential 
nature of Christianity. Most scholars have also long 
ago come to the conclusion that historically we know 
practically nothing of the early life of Jesus, and that all 
the narratives pertaining to them are of legendary growth. 
That, however, does not mean that they cannot be used 
in a subordinate place for the purpose of making clear the 
central place and value of the Person of Christ. 

Whenever and wherever the Christian teacher is called 
upon to deal with this subject and the stories connected 
with it in the New Testament whether at Christmas or 
in critical discussions it must be naturally with some 
positive and constructive end in view. He will certainly 
have to pass many negative and destructive verdicts on 
the proper occasions, but these he will only use to reach 
some higher end. It is also perfectly plain that the end 
he has in view must be a moral and religious one to 
strengthen Christian conviction and to promote deeper 
and more intelligent Christian life. Every book in the 
New Testament was, of course, written directly for the 
same purpose, and when he desires to get the best and the 
whole Christian value out of these Birth-stories, he is 
trying to achieve the very purpose for which they were 
originally written. 



212 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 



THE RELIGIOUS VALUE OF THE BIRTH-STORIES 

The first question, therefore, to which the teacher 
must address himself is the religious value of the stories, 
and he must distinguish that from the physical miracle 
and the historical accuracy of the narratives. That 
religious value may be generally expressed by saying 
that whether the story of the Virgin Birth and the legends 
connected therewith have any direct historical value or 
not, there could be no more convincing proof of the 
tremendous impression made by the personality of Jesus 
upon the early disciples, and of their faith that He was 
divine in some sense than the circulation of these stories 
of His origin. It is not meant that that covers the whole 
of the religious value of the Birth-stories, but it touches 
the main point. Their value is increased rather than 
lessened when we take these stories to be not accounts 
of historical facts, but legendary growths. When they 
are looked at as variations and survivals of the primitive 
wonderland of religion, perhaps even bearing traces of 
the ancient Nature-myths of man's childhood ; when we 
remember that they must have come to the Christians 
through the Messianic beliefs of Judaism combined with 
the Greek mythology of the Sons of God, the fact that 
they were adopted, purified and adapted by the Church 
becomes an astounding proof of the unique significance 
of Jesus for His early disciples. It is from this point of 
view that they retain their value for the Christian preacher 
and the teacher of the senior classes in the Sunday School. 

ITS RELATION TO THE PHYSICAL MIRACLE 

When he has thus put his pupils into the right religious 
attitude towards the Birth-stories, the teacher can then 
try to show how this religious faith in the divine value 
of Jesus is connected now and was connected in the minds 
of the Early Church with the physical miracle. He can 
easily show that at no time was there any essential con- 
nection for the Early Church in general between the two 
things. The mere silence of every part of the New Testa- 
ment, with the exception of the first chapters of Matthew 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 213 

and Luke, is itself enough to show that much. And even 
in these chapters themselves there is not a word to show 
that the authors laid any fundamental stress upon the 
physical manner of the Birth. The most that can be said 
is that the circle of disciples from which these chapters 
come did find in the story one expression of their sense 
of the supreme value of Jesus. There is absolutely no 
reason to think that faith, even for them, in any way 
depended upon the miraculous origin. Throughout the 
whole of the New Testament no appeal is ever made to 
the Virgin Birth as a reason for believing in Jesus as the 
Son of God, neither by Jesus Himself nor by His disciples. 
This separation of the religious value of Christ from the 
physical miracle may be further illustrated by pointing 
to the fact that whatever may have been true of the Early 
Church, in these days the call for belief in a miraculous 
birth is more often than not simply a hindrance to faith 
in Jesus. In very many cases it weakens, and sometimes 
it may destroy, the appeal that comes from what Jesus 
said, did and was in Himself. 

It is upon the background of some such discussions 
as these that the teacher can prepare the minds of his 
pupils for a free and frank discussion of the literary and 
historical questions connected with these stories, which 
probably must have its place sometime in adolescence. 
The importance of these questions must not, however, be 
exaggerated, for once the Virgin Birth ceases to be an 
essential article of Christian faith and belief, the details 
of the literary and historical criticism cease also to be 
of supreme significance for the ordinary Christian disciple. 

Once the stories themselves have been used in different 
ways and at different times to bring the growing soul 
face to face with Jesus Himself and His religious value, 
both Criticism and Education have done their work. 



3 
THE EASTER FAITH 

The Resurrection of Jesus and the narratives connected 
therewith are far more closely interwoven with the litera- 



214 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

ture and history of the New Testament than His Birth. 
The whole subject is also much nearer the heart of the 
Christian Gospel. Belief in the Resurrection of Jesus 
was in some sense essential to the New Testament belief 
in the future life generally, and in some ways it is so still. 
It is, therefore, a much more complicated and necessary- 
task to give these narratives their proper place in the 
teaching of the New Testament and in religious instruc- 
tion as a whole. It is, however, an element of religious 
faith which belongs rather to the verge of maturity than 
to childhood's days. At any rate, it presupposes a fairly 
clear appreciation of the moral and religious value of the 
personality of Jesus, which seems impossible before 
adolescence. 

The first condition of any fruitful dealing with the 
problem is to realize the distinction between the Easter 
Message of the empty grave, including the appearances 
to the disciples and the Easter Faith in the victory of the 
Crucified over death and His continued personal life with 
the Father. 

Our real difficulties begin when we are face to face 
with the historical and distinctively Christian associations 
of Easter, with the Resurrection of Jesus and life beyond 
the grave. The modern study of history, theology and 
education forbids our continuing simply to retail the 
Biblical narratives in their Biblical form without some 
criticism of their nature and value. It is quite as im- 
possible either to pass them by or to give them simply as 
merely popular legends. We know that it is not good 
teaching to force critical considerations upon the children. 
Our lessons must be based upon modern criticism certainly ; 
but, as a rule, it is only positive views and descriptions that 
we ought to present to those who are under the adolescent 
age. The critical considerations upon which those views 
and descriptions are based should be left for later study. 

THE GROWTH OF THE EASTER FAITH 

It is certainly an important part of the work of the 
Christian teacher to transmit a knowledge of the Bible 
and its contents as well as the meaning and history of 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 215 

Christianity. Both these, however, must be subordinate 
to the growth of Christian faith and the formation of 
Christian character. In the end every part of the curri- 
culum must be judged by the contribution it makes to the 
growth of the Christian life. Fundamentally, therefore, 
what we are concerned with here is not the historical 
value of the Resurrection, nor its place in a theological 
system, but how it can help to build up Christian characters 
to-day. 

There are many who assert emphatically that a direct 
communion with the Risen Christ is part of their own 
personal experience. Such communion, however, must in 
any case belong to a more or less mature Christian faith, 
and be very personal in its nature. Moreover, it is im- 
possible to think of it as a force independent of an 
impression already made by the personality of Jesus as 
revealed in His earthly life. We cannot hope to produce 
such experiences in others as a direct power for the growth 
of a Christian life. Repeated as well-authenticated his- 
tory, however, they may help others to feel the force of 
the impression made by Jesus, and thus be of primary 
educative value in a Christian direction. It is, therefore, 
from this point of view that the Resurrection narratives 
of the New Testament must be judged, and it is for this 
purpose they ought to be used in religious instruction 
in so far as they incorporate the genuine historical ex- 
periences of the first disciples. That is also why the 
teacher must come to some conclusion as to how much 
history is contained in these narratives. His great need 
is to try to realize for himself the actual experiences 
through which the disciples went after the death of Jesus, 
and then give to his pupils some positive and concrete 
picture of that experience. 

THE EXPERIENCES OF THE DISCIPLES 

The main features in the narratives that are recognized 
as historical by modern scholars are easily described. 
The Crucifixion had for the moment shattered the grow- 
ing conviction of the disciples that their Master was the 
Messiah of God come to establish the Kingdom. In their 



216 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

despair they fled to Galilee sick and sore at heart. Before 
many weeks were over we find them back again in 
Jerusalem, with their faith restored and openly pro- 
claiming Jesus as the Risen Christ. They were now 
convinced that the Cross was not the defeat of Jesus, but 
ordained of God for His greater triumph. How their 
faith was renewed between Calvary and Pentecost we 
cannot now describe with any great confidence. It is 
difficult to pick out the historical facts underneath the 
stories of the Resurrection whether the grave was found 
empty ; how, when and by whom the Lord was first 
seen. A close study of the narratives themselves reveals 
the fact that it is impossible to obtain any clear and 
consistent picture of the external events. The most that 
we have any historical right to say is, that the change 
from despair to faith was accompanied by a series of 
appearances of the Risen Lord to some of the disciples. 
Most probably, also, Peter was one of the first and fore- 
most to experience this recovery and be instrumental 
in spreading it, and probably the change took place in 
Galilee. 

It is, of course, impossible and undesirable to eliminate 
the mystery and the sense of miracle from this progress 
of the disciples out of deep despair to the recovery of 
faith. Upon any view of the narratives, it will always be 
a very difficult task to describe the psychological process 
that is involved. In spite of its difficulty, however, it is 
certainly the main business of the teacher to attempt 
some positive description that will produce a sense 
of reality, and also some sense of the moral struggle 
through which the disciples fought their way to 
victory. 

The question is, how can such a consistent and con- 
crete picture of the experience of the disciples be con- 
structed out of the materials at our disposal in the New 
Testament ? Many attempts have been made to provide 
the teacher with such a narrative, which must naturally 
be consistent alike with the spirit of the New Testament 
and with the results of modern criticism. The following 
tentative suggestions more or less represent the general 
result of these attempts. 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 217 

BETWEEN CALVARY AND PENTECOST 

We can, to begin with, easily follow the disciples as 
they fled heart-broken on the fateful day from Jerusalem. 
We can follow their thoughts and questionings on the way, 
as well as their tender memories as they pass spot after spot 
for ever consecrated by something said or done by their 
Master. He must have been continually in their thoughts 
by day, and in their dreams by night, all the way to 
Galilee. How was it possible that He could have failed ? 
Was He deceived ? Were they deceived in Him ? How 
could God have let such an One die, and in such a way ? 

Every hope seemed gone ; and yet and yet they had 
been surer of Him than they had been of God Himself. 
The light in His eyes, the tones of His voice, face, form 
and figure came back to them. He had given them some- 
thing that no one else ever had a new life that could 
never be destroyed. 

So, with faint gleams occasionally upon a sea of despair, 
they are home in Galilee once more. It was a struggle 
between the divine impression made upon them by His 
life with them, and the shame and terror of the Cross. One 
after another they came to Capernaum each with the 
same fight going on in his soul. They could not help but 
meet, if only to comfort each other and to remind each 
other of the happy days that were gone for ever. The 
world would never be the same again. Perhaps it was at 
Peter's house they met in the glimmering light when the 
day's work was done. How often they went over the 
great romance of their life how sad to think of ! 

Did they hear any rumours from Jerusalem ? Did 
some of the women who had stayed to the very end come 
with tales of an empty grave, and of passing visions of 
a well-known face ? As they talked of Him, did their 
hearts begin to burn within them as of old ? The authority 
of the Master began once more to assert over them its 
sway stronger than death. They read the 53rd of Isaiah, 
and saw in it a picture of the suffering Servant who was 
still their Master. And was it not Peter repentant, 
aching, impulsive Peter to whom one night was given, 
in the very midst of eloquent, reckless words, the glowing 



2i8 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

vision of the Face Divine ? That moment of ecstasy 
came back again and again with greater power and reality 
to the man who wanted it most, and who could never 
forget the first great moment in which he had said, " Thou 
art the Christ." Then also from him the fire spread 
to hearts made warm again amidst the scenes of the first 
great triumphs of their Lord, after the first terror had 
spent itself. Then at last the coming Pentecostal Feast 
called them back to the scene of the tragedy that was 
slowly becoming a triumph in their minds, and on the 
scene to a greater Pentecost than ever their brightest 
dream had pictured. 

If any view of the Resurrection whether traditional 
or critical is to become educationally effective, or any- 
thing more than a rigid theological dogma, it will be by 
trying in some such way as this to make it psychologically 
probable and real. 

THE STORY OF A GREAT SPIRITUAL STRUGGLE 

It is in any case a difficult task which faces the teacher 
here ; but he can never give up the attempt to accomplish 
it. Christian teachers who give thought to their work 
can never remain satisfied with merely retailing now 
one, now another, of the Biblical stories without attempting 
to give one unified picture. It is the inner history and 
experience of the disciples during this time that must 
be made as real and vivid as possible. On one side, the 
sense of miracle and mystery by which the events are 
surrounded in history and faith must not be lost. But 
there is no justification, on the other side, for burdening 
the moral experience of the disciples with an ancient 
and materialistic view of the universe which we cannot 
wish to perpetuate. 

Once the growing mind has been impressed by some 
conception of the severe spiritual struggle through which 
the disciples passed triumphantly, the youth may be 
taken later on through the Biblical narratives themselves. 
They will then be ready to appreciate their moral meaning, 
and their more or less legendary character may be dis- 
cussed without danger. The emphasis of the Resurrection 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 219 

will have been laid for them in the proper place, namely, 
on the supreme value of the personality of Jesus, and the 
impossibility of thinking that death could ever destroy 
it. Their hold upon the life to come will be strengthened, 
and their ideas with regard to it kept pure and moral. 
Finally, they will also have had the supreme lesson on 
the infinite importance of human personality to God 
and man. These constitute the real Easter faith, the 
essential constructive and educative elements in the 
narratives of the Resurrection. And that teacher will 
keep the feast best of all who can give the simplest, and 
the most real, picture of the inner history of the disciples 
between Calvary and Pentecost. 



THE EASTER MESSAGE 

So far as the Easter Faith of the New Testament is 
concerned, and probably so far also as the needs of moral 
and religious instruction go in our day, we might rest 
satisfied with the foregoing discussion of the Resurrection. 
It does not, however, do full justice to the New Testament 
itself. The Easter Message of the visions of the Lord 
and of the empty grave are also part of the New Testament 
as well as the essential Easter Faith. It is, of course, 
the religious faith in the continued life of Jesus in a full 
and personal form that must remain central ; but we must 
face also the forms taken by that faith in the minds 
of the early Christians, the events which produced or 
occasioned their belief, and especially the relation in which 
the empty grave and the resurrection of the body stood 
to their belief in the continued life. This discussion of 
the Easter Message will naturally be suitable only for the 
later adolescent and senior classes. 



DISCUSSION OF THE EASTER MESSAGE 

We cannot enter upon such a discussion with any profit 
unless we distinguish between the general conditions 



220 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

and beliefs of the first century and those of modern days. 
For us the faith in the continued personal life of the 
Lord, or the permanent value of the character and person- 
ality of Jesus, may be and actually is quite independent 
of the historical facts with regard to the empty grave, 
the physical resurrection and the details of the visions 
of the first disciples. These questions are of interest to 
us mainly because they were so closely connected with 
the form taken by the religious faith of the early Christians, 
and because of the light they cast upon the way in which 
the disciples defended that faith. It is, therefore, quite 
possible that, while sharing the faith of the first disciples, 
we may have to reject as mistaken and inadequate some 
of the reasons which they gave for holding that faith. 

THE STORY OF THE EMPTY GRAVE 

We have, it is true, only a limited knowledge of the 
views of that time with regard to the relation between 
the body and the soul. More or less Greek views of the 
body as the prison-house from which the soul escaped 
at death were to some extent current among the Jews 
in a modified form ; but there can be little doubt that 
the popular Jewish view (with which in this instance we 
are mainly concerned) could not think of the future life 
in the Messianic Age, for instance without the resur- 
rection of the body in some form or other, that is, without 
an empty grave. 

The first disciples could not, therefore, believe in the 
continued personal life of the Lord without at the same 
time taking it for granted that the grave was empty, 
whether they examined it or not. The earliest witnesses 
do not mention the empty grave, nor is the empty grave 
ever given as a reason for belief in the Resurrection. 
All the same, it is very probable that even Paul would 
say that the grave must have been empty. The two 
points at issue are whether any stories of the empty 
grave accompanied the visions and the belief in the 
Resurrection from the first, and if so, whether there 
was any historical foundation for them. The evidence 
of the New Testament is very uncertain and very in- 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 221 

adequate on these points, and the opinions of modern 
scholars are widely divided. Some think that all the 
stories of the empty grave are simply legendary growths 
based on the natural inferences of the disciples from the 
visions, and that there is no historical justification for 
them. Others think that there must be some substratum 
of historical fact underneath them, and that the grave was 
really found to be empty. They then attempt in different 
ways to explain the fact. Probably the truth is that 
the evidence does not justify a definite conclusion either 
way. In any case the New Testament seems to show 
that the empty grave had no influence in producing the 
belief in the Resurrection. It is never spontaneously 
referred to by the Christians as a reason for belief. It 
received prominence only in answer to the objections 
raised by Jewish opponents. Attention having once been 
called to the grave, the Christian imagination continued 
to play about it, until we have at last the marvellous 
descriptions of the actual Resurrection itself in the 
Apocryphal Gospels. In the New Testament there is 
still a good deal of restraint shown in describing what 
happened at the grave itself ; but even there we can trace 
a definite development in the argument and the stories 
connected with it. 

DEVELOPMENT OF THE STORY 

In Paul and in the early speeches of Acts there is no 
mention of the empty grave at all. In Mark, three women 
go to the grave to anoint the body, and find the stone 
rolled away, while in the tomb a young man in a white 
robe sits. He tells them that Jesus is risen, and bids 
them tell the disciples that the Master has gone before 
them into Galilee. They run away frightened and do 
not say a word to any one in their awe. Since the genuine 
end of Mark is lost, we can only guess how the narrative 
was continued. In Matthew we are told that the Jews 
had set a guard of Roman soldiers to watch the tomb, 
which was sealed. When the women came a great shock 
of earthquake occurred, and an angel of the Lord descended 
and rolled away the stone. The soldiers are struck down 



222 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

unconscious, but the angel shows the tomb empty to 
the women and bids them tell the disciples. 

IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS AND THE GOSPEL OF PETER 

This they do immediately. When we come to John, 
we find that Mary Magdalene goes alone to the tomb, 
sees the stone rolled away and the tomb empty. She 
tells Peter and the other disciple whom Jesus loved. 
They run to the place and see for themselves that the 
body is not there. From a comparison of these narratives 
about the empty grave as they are found in Mark xvi. 
1-8, Matt, xxvii. 62-xxviii. 16, Luke xxiv. 1-12, John 
xx. i-io, with the silence of Paul in i Cor. xv. 1-8 
and of Peter in the speeches of Acts, it will be seen that 
the development of the narrative is in two directions 
the aim apparently being to make it more and more 
certain that the grave was really empty, and that the 
only way to account for the fact was the Resurrection. 
The New Testament stops short of giving a description 
of the actual Resurrection itself, though the story of the 
guard and the earthquake in Matthew comes near it. 
This last step is reserved for the more unrestrained imagina- 
tion of the Apocryphal Gospel of Peter. However many 
legendary elements may have crept into the narrative 
of the New Testament, it is reserve itself when compared 
with the unlicensed grotesqueness of the Gospel of Peter. 
There we are told that the elders and scribes hold watch 
at the grave with the Roman guard under Petronius. 
The grave is sealed with seven seals, a tent is pitched 
near by, and the crowds from Jerusalem come out to see. 
During the night the heavens are opened and two men 
come down, the great stone moves of itself to one side, 
and the two men enter the grave. Then all the soldiers 
see three men come out, and they are followed by a cross. 
The heads of the two men reach to heaven, while that of 
the man whom they support reaches above the heavens. 

The whole story has become grotesque as far removed 
as anything could be from both the restraint and the 
spirit of our Gospels. There is no point, however, as 
we trace the story backward from the Gospel of Peter 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 223 

to the Gospel of Mark, at which we can say : Here we 
come at last upon a bedrock of fact. We can only 
comfort ourselves by saying that the story of the empty 
tomb was after all only a dark and dangerous bypath 
even for the faith of the early disciples, while we are 
thankful that we need not travel that way at all in order 
to reach as strong a faith as theirs in the permanent 
value of the character, work and personality of Jesus, 
and in His continued, full, personal life after death. 
The only reason for following this bypath at all in our 
moral and religious instruction is that the contents of 
the New Testament demand it, and that it enables us to 
illustrate the difficulties and weaknesses as well as the 
strength of the Resurrection-faith of early Christianity, 
and that it throws into more vivid contrast the reality 
underlying its temporary forms. 



5 

THE ASCENSION IN CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTION 

This discussion would not be complete without some 
reference to the Ascension, but a few words will suffice 
to place it in its proper relation to the Resurrection. 

THE STORY OF THE ASCENSION 

In his Gospel Luke barely mentions the fact that 
Jesus " parted from them and was carried up into heaven," 
but in the Book of Acts he gives the only detailed descrip- 
tion of the Ascension itself to be found in the New Testa- 
ment. The narrative is not an integral part of the Book 
of Acts. It seems, indeed, to be deliberately introduced 
by the author in order to correct the impression made 
by the Gospel, that the Ascension took place on the same 
day as the Resurrection. In the spurious ending to 
Mark also it takes place on the day of Resurrection. 
In John, while there is a scarcely perceptible interval, 
according to one passage, between the two events, the 
Gospel as a whole looks upon the Resurrection, the 



224 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Ascension and the Parousia as one spiritual process. 
In Paul, too, there is no room for the Ascension as a 
separate event. For Him the Resurrection is a resur- 
rection to the right hand of God in power, and it is thence 
He makes Himself known as still living to His disciples, 
including Paul himself. 

As a matter of fact, the idea or the faith which is here 
clothed in the garb of history is elsewhere generally 
expressed by the figure of Christ sitting at the right hand 
of God, the phrase being used about a dozen times by 
the different writers of the New Testament. 

How these different representations of the Ascension 
are related, and exactly how the Ascension was con- 
nected with the Resurrection on one side and with the 
Parousia on the other, it is difficult to say. Perhaps we 
do not know enough of the history of early Christian 
thought to form any clear judgment. In any case, what- 
ever view may be held as to the bodily resurrection, very 
few would now insist upon a literal interpretation of the 
very materialistic Ascension story in Acts. Its allegorical 
or mythological character is very generally recognized. 
In its present form, at any rate, it is quite unhistorical. 

How it arose is another matter. It may have been 
originally the story of another Resurrection-vision with 
the usual mysterious disappearance at the end. More 
important than the form of the representation is the 
meaning of the Ascension for the faith and life of the 
disciples what it stands for in their experience. It 
was undoubtedly intended to make clear and intelligible 
the faith that Jesus is Lord, that as God's representative 
all authority has been placed in His hands. Not only has 
He come out of His grave alive, but He has come as the 
living Lord. It is essentially the same faith as is ex- 
pressed also through belief in the Resurrection. Its 
educational value and purpose are similar to those of the 
Resurrection-visions, and if it is to be used at all in 
religious instruction, its place is among those visions. 
The Ascension is not an historical event, but it is another 
attempt to represent an historical faith in terms of ancient 
views of the world which have disappeared. We may 
have the same faith, but our changed views of the world 



THE BIRTH AND RESURRECTION OF JESUS 225 

and heaven make it impossible for us to express it in the 
same form. We must express it not in terms of time and 
space, but in terms of morality and religion which also 
the first disciples did for the most part. 

BOOKS 

BRUCE (A. B.j). The Miraculous Element in the Gospels. (London, 

1887.:) 

GORDON (G. A.). Religion and Miracle. (London, 1910.) 
INGE (W. R.). Truth and Falsehood in Religion. (London, 1906.) 
LAKE (KIRSOPP). The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of 

Jesus Christ. (London : Williams & Norgate.) 
LYTTLETON (A. T.). The Place of Miracles in Religion. (London, 

1899.) 

MEYER (A.). Die Auferstehung Christi. (Tubingen, 1905.) 
SOLTAU (W.). The Birth of Jesus Christ. (London, 1907.) 
TRAUB (G.). Die Wunder im Neuen Testament. (Tubingen, 1906.) 
ZURHELLEN. Wie erzdhlen wir, etc. (See Chap. IX.) 



CHAPTER XII 

THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 

1. Paul in the New Testament. Jesus and Paul Sources of our 

Knowledge Extent and Character of the Sources. 

2. The Historical Significance of Paul. His Spiritual Independence 

His Vindication of the Independence of Christianity The 
Creator of the Christian Church, Christian Theology and Christian 
Literature Paul in Christian History. 

3. The Permanent Value of Paul. Matthew Arnold and Paul 

Hellenism and Judaism in Paul Paul's Two Great Aims the 
Free Personality and the Community. 

4. Paul in Christian Instruction. Paul and Jesus in Modern Instruc- 

tion Paul a Difficult Subject Nevertheless Necessary. 

5. The Story of Paul's Life. Natural and Artificial Difficulties The 

Traditional Method Unsatisfactory The Story of Paul. 

6. The Work and Teaching of Paul. The Background of Paul's Work 

and Teaching His Personal Experience His Typical Struggles 
The Motives of Paul's Theology. 

7. The Ethics, Theology and Religion of Paul. Paul's Ethical Teaching 

The Theological Framework Three Main Lines of Thought 
The Anti- Jewish Apologetic The Missionary Theology The 
Theology of the Spirit Central Doctrine of Paul The Religion 
of Paul. 



PAUL IN THE NEW TESTAMENT 

IT is certainly the first and the ultimate task of the 
Christian teacher to make Jesus Christ live effectively 
in the mind and heart and will in the conscience of His 
pupils. With as little doubt, the second task of the 
teacher of the New Testament is to make Paul, the greatest 
messenger Jesus has yet found, deliver his own peculiar 
message to men, and exercise his own peculiar power over 
men in the service of his Lord. As the second great 
personality in the history of early Christianity, the 






THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 227 

Apostle is without a rival. Strictly there is no third 
except the great Unknown who stands behind the 
Johannine writings. 



JESUS AND PAUL 

At the beginning of the greatest spiritual movement 
in human history stand these two personalities of such 
extraordinary power and originality one of them at 
least, if not both, towering into sheer sublimity far above 
all the heroes of the centuries. In them and in the 
relations between them are mirrored all the most im- 
portant spiritual problems which have ever vexed the 
soul of man the reality of the unseen, the nature and 
means of communion with God, the value of personality, 
the essential nature of Christianity and its relation to 
other religions, the relation between history and religion 
as well as the relation between religion and theology. 
To make these two live again in the souls of men is a 
work not only of surpassing interest, but also of sur- 
passing importance for the moral and spiritual welfare 
of mankind. This has become self-evident so far as the 
personality, work and message of Jesus are concerned. 
What is, perhaps, not yet so fully realized is that it is 
essential to understand and appreciate the personality, 
work and message of Paul also, both for the sake of his 
own independent value and in order to understand the 
place of Jesus in and above the whole Christian movement. 
It is, indeed, the secret of the power of early Christian 
history that these two stand together at its birth and 
baptism. The problem of their relation to each other in 
dependence and independence, holds the key to the inter- 
pretation of the New Testament. 

In order to get within reach of the solution of that 
problem and in order to enter into the full heritage of the 
New Testament, the Christian teacher and the Christian 
disciple must try again and again to make Paul a living 
reality to his mind and conscience. 

Fortunately, we have fuller and more direct information 
about Paul than about any of his contemporaries. That 
knowledge comes to us mainly from two reliable sources. 



228 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 



SOURCES OF OUR KNOWLEDGE OF PAUL 

1. Incorporated in the Book of Acts is a document 
which is generally recognized as a first-hand account 
written by Luke the Physician, the friend and companion 
of the Apostle. This provides us with a direct record of an 
interested spectator who was also something of a hero- 
worshipper. Paul's own revelations of his mind and heart 
in his letters find an echo and an effective comment in 
those more concrete and particular observations of his 
faithful fellow- worker. 

2. We have also the good fortune of possessing at 
least eight and probably ten letters written or dictated 
by Paul and more carefully preserved than any other 
literary records of his time. They are all genuine personal 
letters, written to his converts and Churches. They are 
not treatises or essays dealing systematically with special 
subjects of general interest, but letters meant originally 
for the use of individuals or small groups all more or 
less known to the Apostle. They may not, therefore, 
enable us to give a systematic account of his thought, 
but they are all the more valuable because so often they 
are unconscious revelations of his life and character. 

One of them, and the most brief of all the letter to 
Philemon is a very intimate personal note, written 
merely to accompany the return of a runaway slave to his 
owner, and recommending him to the renewed care of his 
Christian master. For all its brevity it is a miracle of self- 
revelation. 

Another was written to Christian disciples in Rome, and 
stands at the other extreme from Philemon, on the verge 
of becoming a systematic discussion of the main message 
of the Apostle. 

There are two letters (probably incorporating a third) 
written to Corinth in Greece and dealing mostly with some 
definite problems of the application of the Gospel to the 
life of the Church and the community. 

One is a letter of thanks to his Christian friends at 
Philippi in Macedonia, acknowledging their care for him 
while he was in prison at Rome, and full of personal 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 229 

revelations of his heart and of his love for them and for 
his work. 

Two are directed to the Christians of Salonica, and 
are mainly noted for their discussions of the early Christian 
eschatological hopes and fervours which were creating 
difficulties among them. Another is a strong appeal to 
stand fast in Christian liberty, which went to the Christian 
Churches of Galatia in Asia Minor ; while the last two 
Ephesians and Colossians went to the Province of Asia 
the most populous and significant region of the Empire, 
ind in many ways the centre of the religion, commerce 
and thought of the world. 

The three Pastoral Epistles to Timothy and Titus are 
also attributed to Paul, but it is doubtful whether more 
than fragments of them at most have come from him, 
while there is no doubt that the Epistle to the Hebrews 
has been falsely attributed to the Apostle. 

These are the documents which provide us with 
authentic raw-material so far as they go for describing 
the history, work and personality of Paul. The letters 
show that he was a man who had an extraordinary capacity 
for self-revelation. He possessed the infrequent gift not 
only of observing the facts of his inner life and the struggles 
of his will, but also of interpreting and describing his 
soul's experiences with clearness and power in an in- 
telligent and intelligible form. 

Luke also was a descriptive writer of no mean power, 
and the dramatic moments in Paul's adventurous travels 
lose nothing of their significance in the telling. 

EXTENT AND CHARACTER OF THE SOURCES 

There is, however, still a great deal that these docu- 
ments (and some other more indirect records of Paul in 
Acts and elsewhere) do not tell us about the Apostle, 
and it is necessary to emphasize the fragmentary character 
of our knowledge at its best. They barely cover the last 
ten years of his life and activities. There are at least 
fifty years and those the formative and most energetic 
years about which we know very little directly, though 
we may be able to infer a great deal from the letters 



230 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

and Luke's diary. Moreover, the letters which have been 
preserved represent only a small portion of Paul's corre- 
spondence even during the last period of his life. Being 
also purely occasional in their nature, they take for granted 
a great many things essential for our full interpretation 
of them and their writer. They contain only fragments 
of Paul's thought, and though there are many signs of 
a more or less complete intellectual system behind the 
letters, it is a precarious task to reconstruct that system 
out of the broken fragments which they preserve. 

The result is, that there still remain many unsolved 
problems with regard to the life, personality and theology 
of the Apostle, and it is necessary for the teacher to realize 
that fact. 

There are problems not only of the chronology and 
course of his life, but also of the character and significance 
of his education, the meaning of his conversion, the history 
of the first seventeen years of his life as a Christian, his 
relation to Barnabas and to the first Apostles, of his 
exact relation to the Greek world and its thought, the 
influence of the Mystery-Cults upon him, as well as of 
his historical and spiritual relation to Jesus Christ. These 
and many similar questions with regard to Paul are still 
not settled. 

It is true that we can often fall back upon probable 
inferences, and upon our general knowledge of the time 
and its conditions for help to solve them ; and a great 
deal of what passes as Paul and Paulinism has its sole 
source in such inferences. 

The teacher will, therefore, find it necessary to give 
his whole mind to an ever-renewed study of Paul, to 
scrutinize carefully every picture and deal honestly with 
his pupils with regard to his own reconstruction of the 
figure of the Apostle. 

2 

THE HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF PAUL 

Whatever inadequacy there may be in our sources, 
it is abundantly clear that Paul played the main part in 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 231 

the development of Christianity, and we can see clearly 
some of the main directions in which his central signifi- 
cance for early Christian history lies. 



PAUL'S SPIRITUAL INDEPENDENCE 

i. In the first place, he became of primary import- 
ance because he had fought his way more or less inde- 
pendently to a moral and spiritual level of thought and 
life which was not far removed from where Jesus Himself 
had stood. It is true that he did not reach that level 
either so easily or so naturally as Jesus. The Master 
towers far above the Apostle in simple and natural 
majesty of bearing, and in His unclouded certitude of 
soul. Paul's outlook was never so clear nor so direct 
and effective as that of Jesus. Paul had come to it 
through devious ways over arid, trackless wastes, and 
he came in bedraggled garments and bespattered with 
mud, sore and sick, and with his patience worn by failures. 
Still he had, with so much travail, come so far upon his 
way that it seems to have required only the touch of the 
Spirit of Jesus at a critical moment for him to discover 
the secret of God and His Fatherhood, man and his 
brotherhood, life and its triumphant redemption. 

In the story of Christian origins, Paul is no secondary 
figure who has simply borrowed all that he has. In 
many ways he is a personality of striking originality in 
his experience and conception of the Gospel as well as 
in his intellectual and missionary application of it. There 
is nothing second-hand about his religious faith, although 
the direct and indirect personal influence of Jesus at the 
critical moment counted for so much in his history. 
There is little that is merely borrowed in his theology, 
though he owes so much to the conceptions of Pharisaism. 
His Church is an original conception in spite of its growth 
out of the Primitive Christian community. His universal 
mission was a new thing in history, in spite of its many 
parallels with the activities of the vagrant priests of 
Mithras and Isis, of the wandering teachers of an eclectic 
philosophy and of the ' apostles ' of Judaism in the 
Hellenistic world. 



232 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

Nearest to Jesus he stands in the originality and 
universality of his spiritual experience, the directness of 
his touch with God, the courage with which he accepted 
the results, the daring and the stubborn will with which 
he obeyed the vision when it came. 

It is futile to speculate whether Paul would ever have 
won his way through without the timely help of Jesus. 
We only know that the compelling touch of the Master- 
soul meant for Paul the final opening of the door of life, 
and that for Paul it was the figure of Jesus that stood for 
ever more at the threshold. 

This, then, was the first great deed of Paul to come 
groping in the dark to the very threshold of the new 
discovery and to recognize in Jesus the hand of the Lord 
who helped him through. 

VINDICATION OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF CHRISTIANITY 

2. Secondly, when Paul had found in Jesus Christ the 
God he sought and the fuller life for which he longed, 
he also found the movement which Jesus had already 
created in danger of settling down into an obscure Jewish 
sect. He recognized in it the making of a world-religion 
and the stronger rival of the Judaism of his dreams. So 
he boldly went forth to make it what it was meant to be 
and what he somehow knew Jesus Himself had meant it 
to be. In thought and practice he freed from the bonds 
of Judaism the Gospel of the free grace of God revealed 
and incarnate in the living Christ for the redemption of 
mankind. He justified its independence and originality, 
practically and theoretically, both against its weak- 
kneed friends and its Jewish enemies, using their own 
intellectual and historical weapons against themselves. 
He used the Jewish terms and Jewish doctrines to vindicate 
the independence, originality and supremacy of the new 
religion. It was probably the only means by which he 
could theoretically set free the Christian Gospel from the 
bonds of Judaism as well as from the halting compromises 
of the Primitive Jewish-Christian Church. 

In practice also it was Paul who did actually take the 
new religion out into the wide world and planted it firmly 






THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 233 

in the heart of the great cities of the Roman Empire. 
He was the most effective missionary Christianity has ever 
known. His mission was far greater in idea and plan and 
method than even in its actual performance. It is true 
that he had a large number of helpers in this work, and 
some forerunners, but his was the master-mind and 
master-will in the whole movement. Before he died, the 
main strategic points in four great provinces of the 
Empire Galatia, Asia, Macedonia and Achaia had been 
occupied by groups of Christian converts, themselves 
energetic centres of missionary work for Christ, knowing 
of each other and rivalling each other in their efforts 
within the bonds of the same organization. That work 
meant planting the new Gospel not only in the heart 
of Hellenistic Asia but also of Europe. In the hands of 
Paul it meant planting Christianity also in a form in 
which it could be assimilated by the peoples of the Graeco- 
Roman world. He started the process of inserting the 
Gospel into the living categories of that world its yearn- 
ing for redemption, its hope of a divine Saviour, its mystery- 
rites, its collegiate consciousness and its philosophic terms. 
Such was the second great deed of Paul. 

THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH, CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY, 
CHRISTIAN LITERATURE 

3. Three other things he did which were each of 
primary significance for the history of Christianity, but 
which we can here group together. He became the 
effective creator of the Christian Church local and 
universal ; he was the first Christian theologian ; and 
he laid the foundations of a Christian literature. 

Paul not only evangelized the great cities, but also 
organized his converts in each place and shepherded 
their souls carefully and patiently. He kept in close 
touch with his churches and had his messengers continually 
passing to and fro among them. 

It was Paul also who first attempted to give the 
Christian Gospel, experience and movement a definitely 
intellectual and theological expression. It has indeed 
been said that his whole Gospel was a theology. He 



234 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

certainly seems to have been impelled by his very nature 
and training to search for intellectual forms by means 
of which he could express, for his own satisfaction and 
the edification of his converts, the meaning of his and 
their new experience and Gospel. He seems also to have 
definitely formulated his Gospel in intellectual forms as 
a weapon of offence and attack in his dealings both with 
Jews and Gentiles. 

Finally, the service of Paul to Christian literature is 
twofold. He was the first comprehensively and effectively 
to claim the Old Testament as a Christian book, and also 
in his own way to justify that claim. More directly, 
his own letters form the first nucleus of an original 
Christian literature. He so discussed the questions 
which were of vital and passing interest to his Churches 
in his letters that they introduced the Christian move- 
ment effectively into the realm of the highest literature. 
In some senses they were in form and matter a new 
phenomenon in the Greek, Roman and Jewish world 
of their time. Many of their great passages must have 
come to the men of the time like streams of living water 
to thirsty souls. Using the colloquial Greek of the common 
people, they gave fresh and classical utterance to some of 
the deepest and most universal experiences of the human 
heart. Their fervour and enthusiasm, their freshness and 
moral earnestness, their directness and simplicity, must 
have come as a new revelation from God to those who 
were accustomed to the foolish garrulity, the elegant 
posing and the empty rhetoric of the majority of the 
literary men of those generations. These were unique 
services, and it is they which give to Paul his unique place 
in the development of early Christianity. 

PAUL IN CHRISTIAN HISTORY 

We need not enlarge upon the significance and influence 
of the Apostle Paul in and upon the nineteen centuries 
which have passed since his death. His power over certain 
types of mind has been incalculably great, though other 
men, even after repeated efforts, have utterly failed to 
appreciate his greatness or to understand him. Many 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 235 

have even shrunk from him in disgust. He has been more 
ardently followed (though seldom loved), more bitterly 
hated and more seriously misunderstood than almost 
any other great personality in history. Men like Marcion, 
on the one hand, and Luther, on the other, have revelled 
in his presence, while the Neoplatonist and the Hellenic 
mind have almost always hated him. He has been too 
Jewish for these, while for others he has been too much 
of a Greek. By way of veneration or reaction, however, 
almost the whole history of Christianity might be written 
in terms of the Pauline experience and the Pauline 
theology. At times he has overshadowed even the figure 
of Jesus Himself, and a long line of the men who for good 
or ill have made the history of Europe bear the marks of 
Paul even more deeply then he did ' the marks of Jesus.' It 
has sometimes been for ill rather than good, because the 
Paul who was thus honoured was not the full and complete 
Paul. 



3 
THE PERMANENT VALUE OF PAUL 

MATTHEW ARNOLD AND PAUL 

Ernest Renan was of opinion that Paul was now at 
last coming to the end of his long reign, but, as a matter 
of fact, what he saw was the reaction against a false 
view of Paul, dissolving into a better appreciation of 
Paul's permanent significance and value as a man and 
a thinker and a Christian personality. The fitting man 
to answer Renan, therefore, was Matthew Arnold, who 
in spite of many qualities which seemed to unfit him to 
become the interpreter of Paul, was yet the first to lead 
us back to a better and more human understanding of the 
Apostle. " Precisely the contrary," he writes in answer 
to Renan, " I venture to think, is the judgment to which 
a true criticism of men and things, in our own country 
at least, leads us. ... The reign of the real St. Paul is 
only beginning ; his fundamental ideas, disengaged from 
the elaborate misconceptions with which Protestantism 



236 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

has overlaid them, will have an influence in the 
future greater than any which they have yet had an 
influence proportioned to their correspondence with a 
number of the deepest and most permanent facts of 
human nature itself. . . . Not in our day will Paul relive, 
with his incessant effort to find a moral side to miracle, 
with his incessant effort to make the intellect follow and 
secure all the workings of the religious perception. Of 
those who care for religion, the multitude of us want the 
materialism of the Apocalypse, the few want a vague 
religiosity. Science, which more and more teaches us to 
find in the unapparent the real, will gradually serve to 
conquer the materialism of popular religion. The friends 
of vague religiosity, on the other hand, will be more and 
more taught by experience that a theology, a scientific 
appreciation of the facts of religion, is wanted for religion. 
. . . Both these influences will work for Paul's re- 
emergence. The doctrine of Paul will arise out of the 
tomb where for centuries it has lain buried ; it will edify 
the Church of the future. It will have the consent of 
happier generations, the applause of less superstitious 
generations. All will be too little to pay half the debt 
which the Church of God owes to this ' least of the 
Apostles/ ' who was not fit to be called an Apostle because 
he persecuted the Church of God.' " 1 

HELLENISM AND JUDAISM IN PAUL 

The way may seem far from the Apostle Paul to 
Matthew Arnold, but in their very different ways they 
were both engaged in the same never-ending task. They 
were both defending a gospel which was to the Jews a 
stumbling-block and to the Greeks foolishness, but which 
was intended to lead to a method of life involving the 
reconciliation of Hebraism and Hellenism while preserving 
the one from Hellenisticism and the other from Pharisaism. 
In that struggle is to be found the spiritual significance 
of Paul, and Matthew Arnold is the best witness to its 
permanence. The analysis may be crude and incomplete, 

1 Matthew Arnold, St. Paul and Protestantism (popular edition, London, 
1888), pp. i, 2, 80. 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 237 

nevertheless it is true that the main values of modern 
life are to be traced back to the messages of Greece and 
Palestine the struggle between them and the many 
attempts to reconcile them in the individual and social 
life. Paul was the first (unless Philo of Alexandria be 
accounted worthy to stand by his side) to realize and to 
face the problem in any comprehensive way as well as 
to do any sort of justice to some elements at least in both. 
He did attempt to combine the freedom of Greece with 
the ethical emphasis of the Jew into a great ideal of a 
free moral personality as the end and aim of all his efforts. 
He at least attempted to pour the energies of the divine 
community of Israel and the comprehension of the 
philosophic republic of Greece into a new universalism 
which was to take shape in a world-wide Christian 
Church. 

It is in these two things the emphasis on the freedom 
and independence of the moral personality and his emphasis 
on the solidarity of the race ' in Christ ' that we find 
the permanent value of Paul, and also his peculiar touch 
with modern needs and interests. A thorough study of 
him in the light of these two great ends has an abiding 
value. 

PAUL'S Two GREAT AIMS 

For these two ends he is almost a fanatical enthusiast 
with an almost unearthly strain of reckless abandon to 
his cause, ready to pay almost any price for its success 
in aches and pains of body, in the travail of his soul 
and even in a tattered reputation giving continually 
of his best and truest to it, without money and without 
price and without thanks, at the sacrifice of comfort, 
home, friends and people. 

This capacity for unstinted devotion to such causes 
is directly due to the fact that he looks upon his task as 
almost exclusively a religious one. He is, indeed, a typical 
example of an intensely religious personality God- 
haunted and God-subdued and of what such a personality 
can accomplish among men. His personal experience of 
religion was a classical one. It is still the clearest and 
most characteristic example of one of the two most 



238 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

important types of the specifically Christian experience 
and faith. It was characteristic of him that this did 
not become a mere c religiosity/ but an intense passion 
for righteousness, a constant pressure upon his will. It 
also made an imperative call upon his intellect urging 
him to a more and more thorough and comprehensive 
expression of his faith in intellectual terms, and to its 
incorporation in the social life of the world. Every age 
stands in need of being kept in touch with such men, 
and to be reminded of the fundamental values they 
express and our modern time perhaps more than any 
other. 

Naturally, these permanent values in Paul are com- 
bined with many elements merely temporary and passing. 
His picture of the world, his belief in angels and demons, 
his views of body and soul, and many others of his beliefs, 
have gone never to return, having had their say and done 
their work. If we judged Paul merely by his theological 
method, whether in argument or in the formulation of 
his doctrines, he would remain for us a figure of the past 
with whom we have now very little in common. 

He himself, however, is none the less a typical person- 
ality, and the work he performed in and through these 
temporary forms is none the less permanent in its essential 
nature and significance. 

The historical achievements of the Apostle Paul are 
great and various, but they do not exhaust his work. 
In and through the things he said and did, he left behind 
him the impress of a personality of enduring value- 
greater than anything he ever said or did. 



4 
PAUL IN CHRISTIAN INSTRUCTION 

PAUL AND JESUS IN MODERN INSTRUCTION 

In many ways it is a difficult task to give the Apostle 
Paul his own proper and peculiar place in a system of 
Christian instruction and education. He is a much more 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 239 

complicated personality than Jesus, was born and worked 
in a more complicated situation. The stamp of his age 
is seen more clearly and oftener upon his thought, work 
and life. He was called upon to meet many practical 
problems which were beyond the horizon of Jesus. His 
touch with fundamental human nature was not so direct 
and simple as that of his Master. 

The universalism of Jesus, for instance, may not be 
so explicit in expression and application as that of the 
Apostle. It was, nevertheless, quite as real. It was more 

(effective in the long run, because its roots went down to 
simpler and more permanent elements in humanity. He 
found universal humanity in every individual in his 
relation to the Father. The forms of Paul's peculiar 
contribution to universalism are more extensive than 
intensive, more cosmopolitan than psychological. He 
reads humanity in terms of nations rather than of in- 
dividual human nature. What Jesus therefore gave to 
the world was a universal Gospel, but the special con- 
tribution of Paul was a universal Church and a federation 
of religious communities within which the individual 
personality must hold a more or less precarious place. 
Paul himself, it is true, made the promotion of both his 
aim, but even he did not always succeed in resolving the 
inevitable tension between them. The universalism of 
Jesus is therefore more easily grasped than that of Paul, 
and it also provides a more central and effective educational 
motive. In any case, it is clear that it is far easier for 
the modern world to find points of contact with the Gospel 
of Jesus than with the Church of Paul. 

First of all, too, it is in the region of the concrete and 
varied application of the Gospel that the educational value 
of the Apostle Paul mainly lies, whereas Jesus brings us 
in a simple and direct way face to face with the spirit and 
fundamental principles of that Gospel. The latter, of 
course, are also to be found in Paul, but in order to see 
them we have often to thrust aside a mass of strange 
material which prevents the clear and direct revelation 
of them. Paul himself, and others for him, have built 
around his central heart high walls which are not always 
easy to scale. 



240 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

PAUL A DIFFICULT SUBJECT 

The concreteness of his presentations in his theological 
doctrines, his Church and his many other definite applica- 
tions of the Christian faith are educationally deceptive, as 
the history of Christian instruction plainly shows. They 
are fairly easy to transmit superficially, but more often 
than not it has been easier to rest content with the Pauline 
forms than to press forward and inward beyond them 
into the central faith and Christian spirit of the 
Apostle. 

The problem, therefore, of teaching Paul as a real 
element in Christian instruction and education is no light 
task, and cannot be solved without a good deal of hard 
work and strenuous thought. 

In one thing alone does Paul seem at first to have an 
advantage over Jesus as a teaching instrument. We feel 
that we ought to know more about him and to know 
him more personally and directly than Jesus. Though a 
biography is no more possible in his case than in that of 
Jesus, still Paul does speak to us directly in his own 
letters as well as through the dramatic story of Acts, 
while we have our knowledge of Jesus only at second 
or even third hand. 

This, however, does not help us so much as it might 
seem to do. It is balanced by other and more vital con- 
siderations. The letters of Paul are, of course, of vital 
importance for our understanding of him, but somehow 
or other, great as their power often is, they have not in 
them the same power of revelation as the material of the 
Synoptic Gospels. Jesus even through His reporters can 
reveal more of Himself in a few brief sayings than Paul in 
a long letter. 

Generally speaking, therefore, Paul provides material 
more intractable in the hands of the modern teacher than 
does Jesus. It is much more complicated and needs more 
manipulation, because Paul is always moving more towards 
the circumference of the Christian Gospel and life. He 
deals much more" largely with the particular concrete and 
temporary application and expression of the Christian 
Gospel. 






THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 241 

PAUL NEVERTHELESS NECESSARY 

This fact, however, though it may set before us a 
difficult task, means that we have all the more need 
of Paul alongside of Jesus in any complete scheme of 
Christian instruction. It is not only that he fills a large 
place in the New Testament, but he provides the necessary 
complement to Jesus and His teaching. The practical 
application of the Gospel under the direction of the 
Apostle Paul is an essential element in its full presenta- 
tion, and therefore in Christian instruction, especially in 
view of our modern situation. We need a much clearer 
recognition of the fact that such a comprehensive and 
devoted crusade for the incorporation of the Gospel in the 
intellectual convictions of men, in their personal callings 
and work, and in social institutions, is not only a corollary 
to it, but a necessary element of the Gospel itself. The 
application may change from age to age, but it is in the 
process that the Christian Gospel finds its reality, fulness 
and power. 

It is, then, one of our great tasks to make the Pauline 
material in the New Testament effective as one of the 
primary elements in Christian instruction. But before 
we can make this material effective we must somehow 
make the figure of Paul and his work interesting in the 
deeper sense to the modern mind ; and in order to make 
him interesting we must so far as possible make him in- 
telligible. Our task is to promote and cultivate a better 
and clearer understanding of Paul in order to enlist the 
hearts and emotions of men on his side so that he may 
grip their will and conscience. 



5 
THE STORY OF PAUL'S LIFE 

NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL DIFFICULTIES 

As we have seen, it is not easy to make Paul intelligible. 
We have to meet the natural difficulties arising from the 
16 



242 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

nature of his personality, the course of his education, the 
character of his moral and spiritual experiences, the 
complication of his environment, the intricate windings 
of his subtle mind, the variety and wide extent of his 
activities as well as the extraordinary contradictions 
revealed in his historical influence upon different types of 
men and their very different reactions under his influence. 
In addition, however, to such natural difficulties as these, 
we have made other difficulties for ourselves by our 
traditional methods of approaching and dealing with the 
task of teaching Paul. We have generally started from 
the wrong end and emphasized the wrong side. Paul, the 
theologian, has loomed far too largely and too early in our 
minds as teachers, and in our instruction. It is indeed a 
matter of grave doubt whether a detailed study of Paul's 
theology as such can ever become an integral part of 
Christian instruction at all except in mature, select and 
more or less expert circles. The difficulties of making it 
really intelligible and interesting are so great as permanently 
to stand in the way of our finding the simpler and more real 
Paul who stands behind his theological constructions. At 
any rate, if we let the latter control our approach to him 
we are quite likely to remain simply puzzled by them and 
to find the door leading to the understanding and apprecia- 
tion of Paul shut against us. 



TRADITIONAL METHOD UNSATISFACTORY 

We must, without doubt, pluck up the courage, so far 
as all effective instruction is concerned, to break away 
quite definitely and decisively from the traditional methods. 
Our educational study of Paul must proceed on more 
historical lines begin with the dramatic human elements 
in his life and adventures, go on to describe him as a 
Christian disciple, and try to make him intelligible as a 
Christian missionary and organizer, selecting only so much 
of his letters and his thought as may be absolutely 
necessary for this purpose. Then and then only will 
come the time to present him as the creator of n 
Christian Literature, as a theologian and in his universal 
significance. 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 243 

Once we adopt this general attitude to our task, the 
distribution of the Pauline material in a progressive 
Christian instruction will not be so difficult. 



THE STORY OF PAUL 

It is not much that we can usefully employ in the 
curriculum for childhood. That will probably consist of 
>me of the more dramatic incidents in the life and adven- 
;ures of Paul the Traveller selected and somewhat more 
idapted to this age from Mr. Basil Matthews' Paul the 
Dauntless, and including some justifiable imaginative 
construction of the early days at Tarsus, the scene at 
the stoning of Stephen, the story of the conversion in its 
more external aspects, some of the adventures in Galatia, 
Ephesus and elsewhere, the arrest and first trial, the 
voyage to Rome and maybe one or two others. These 
will not amount to anything like a life of Paul, but they 
may easily be strung together so as to form a more or 
less connected narrative. 

In early adolescence will come the attempt to describe 
the life and work of Paul as a Christian man and as a 
Christian missionary more fully and more connectedly. 
For this purpose, the inspiration and guidance offered by 
Paul the Dauntless are invaluable and unique. There is 
nothing like it in modern literature, and the teacher will 
do well to soak himself in its spirit and method before he 
begins his task. 

The merely wearisome recital of the three missionary 
journeys, with the deadly repetition of more or less empty 
names of cities and countries stereotyped for the memory, 
has always been a heavy burden for the teacher to carry 
and for the pupil to endure. Much more interesting and 
much more illuminating would be some attempt to make 
Paul's travels live as pictures even if the record of his 
journeys be far from complete. Still more to the point 
would be some effort to distinguish between the experi- 
mental methods of the first period in Cilicia, Antioch, 
and the journey with Barnabas, and the later period 
when Paul went off on his own lines, and the vision of a 
great imperial mission stood clear before him. 



244 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

This story of the life of Paul should probably be 
accompanied and illustrated by some appropriate quota- 
tions from the Book of Acts and the Epistles ; and also 
by some elementary account of the origin and purpose of 
his letters some two or three of them being selected as 
examples in their proper connection. 



6 
THE WORK AND TEACHING OF PAUL 

THE BACKGROUND OF PAUL'S WORK AND TEACHING 

Following this story of Paul as a Christian man and 
a Christian missionary would come in middle and late 
adolescence a study of the work of the Apostle as a whole 
in relation to his heritage and environment, his character 
and personality. 

i. The first part of this task is to provide the life, 
thought and work of Paul with its own peculiar back- 
ground. An attempt must be made to give some descrip- 
tion of Judaism and Pharisaism, mainly as the soil out 
of which Paul grew, and partly as one of the enemies he 
had to face in carrying out his chief task. Secondly 
and on the other hand, the Hellenistic popular thought 
and religion in the Roman Empire must also be present 
in the background, to a certain extent, as one of the 
influences which moulded him, but more as the power he 
set himself to conquer and subdue to the life of the Gospel. 

There is also a third element which must have its 
place in any introduction to the study of Paul, namely, 
the Primitive Church. He may have had fleeting glimpses 
of Jesus in Jerusalem and may once and again have 
listened to His voice, but more often than not the 
Primitive Church historically stands between him and 
the Master. To the first disciples belong the earliest 
experiences of the Risen Jesus, as well as the preservation 
of the memories of His earthly life. It was they also who 
established the first Christian community. Their signifi- 
cance in the New Testament is therefore twofold. They 




THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 245 

preserved and mediated the direct and personal influences 
of Jesus and also, both positively and negatively, prepared 
the way for Paul. 

The similarities and differences between Paul and 
these three elements in his heritage and environment 
should be revealed fairly clearly in our study of the 
Apostle. It was upon these that he built, but it was 
these also which he had to fight on behalf of his Gospel. 

In view of the present state of our knowledge of 
the Primitive Church as well as of Judaism and of the 
Hellenistic religion, the teacher will not find it an easy 
task to make this part of his study of Paul useful and 
fruitful educationally. 

PAUL'S PERSONAL EXPERIENCE 

2. The second element in the discussion will be some 
analysis of the moral and spiritual experiences of the 
Apostle, and especially of his conversion. No one has 
yet succeeded in making the experiences of Paul on the 
way to Damascus either historically or psychologically 
quite intelligible. Probably there will here always remain 
a surd beyond our calculation and elements beyond our 
control. But it would be a great service to Christian 
instruction if only the peculiar character of Paul's ex- 
perience could be made clear by comparison with other 
classical instances of similar conversions like those of 
Augustine and Luther, which involve in general the same 
type of sudden break with the past and a thoroughgoing 
reconstruction ' by the grace of God ' of the whole life. 

Out of these experiences sprang the great aims which 
afterwards controlled the lifelong activities of Paul the 
ultimate values revealed in that life and work. These 
we have already described generally as the creation and 
promotion of free moral personalities on the one hand and 
of a universal Christian community or Church on the 
other. 

THE TYPICAL STRUGGLES OF PAUL 

In the pursuit of these aims we find Paul more and 
more forced into antagonism and a desperate struggle 



246 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

with the legalism of Judaism and the Primitive Church 
on the one hand and on the other with the non-ethical 
paganism of the Hellenistic world. 

It is in the emergence and development of these 
struggles in so definite and defined a form that the central 
historical and permanent significance of the Apostle Paul 
for education lies the life-and-death struggle of new 
ideals for supremacy over the old, incorporated in con- 
crete forms. 

It is essentially the same struggle as we find in the 
history of all the prophetic figures of the race in Luther 
and Savonarola, in Wyclif and Hus, in the Hebrew prophets 
and in Jesus, in different forms. It might, in fact, be said 
that one of the greatest tasks of all education is to make 
this struggle living to, and live again in, the minds, hearts 
and will of the young. 

A comparative study of some of these outstanding 
personalities from this point of view would be one of the 
most significant contributions to spiritual education, and 
Paul has undoubtedly his own contribution to make for 
this purpose. The struggle against Judaism is most 
clearly represented by the letter to the Galatians, and the 
struggle against Hellenistic paganism by First Corinthians ; 
and these letters might well be studied definitely in this 
connection. 

THE MOTIVES OF PAUL'S THEOLOGY 

3. What will provide the climax to the study of these 
struggles both positively and negatively and also the 
best introduction to the study of Paul's theology, as well 
as the best bridge between it and his experience, is a 
definite consideration of the pedagogic and apologetic 
elements in Paul's life and thought. Most of Paul's 
theological constructions spring directly out of his needs 
as a defender of the faith, against its two great enemies, 
and then out of his needs as an organizer and teacher of 
his converts. 

Behind this motive of the missionary teacher there 
is, of course, the primary demand of his own personal 
experience of Christ and God for intellectual explanation 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 247 

and interpretation upon a mind like that of Paul. From 
this point of view Paul's theology is an attempt to uni- 
versalize his own personal experience ; but that experi- 
ence is not allowed freely to find its own intellectual 
expression. In the particular forms it takes it is con- 
ditioned now by categories borrowed from his old Pharisaic 
theology, and again by influences from Hellenistic thought. 
It is conditioned also by the urgent need of defence against 
Judaism on the one hand and paganism on the other ; and 
finally also by the more positive desire to promote the 
growth of the Christian life in his converts. It is the 
loose combination of these more or less divergent sources 
and motives that explain the varied forms and com- 
plexities of Paul's theological constructions. 

Educationally, it is a far more important task to un- 
ravel these motives that led to all the theologizing of Paul 
than to study his doctrines in detail or to attempt to 
reduce his often occasional theological statements into a 
consistent system. It is in order to realize vividly the 
force and character of these motives that we need here 
a definite study of Paul as a missionary teacher the 
defender of the faith against Jews and Greeks and the 
faithful pastor of the flock of Christ . 



THE ETHICS, THEOLOGY AND RELIGION OF 

PAUL 

From all this we can then proceed more hopefully to 
a special study of Paul's Ethics and Theology, and in the 
end come back through them once more to that funda- 
mental religious faith which he shared with Jesus Christ 
and found also in Him completely incorporated and made 
' the power of God unto salvation.' 

PAUL'S ETHICAL TEACHING 

i. In order to avoid any danger of misinterpreting 
Paul's theology, it is just as well first of all to emphasize 



248 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

his intense moral earnestness and teaching. Not that we 
can speak of ethics in any technical sense or of ethical 
theories in connection with Paul, but we need to be sure 
that his full message is not only an intellectual formulation 
of the Christian experience, but also a definite application 
of the Gospel to the life of the will, both in the activities 
of the personal life and in social relations. 

The ethical imperative is as much a reality to Paul as 
it was to Jesus. The moral sense of responsibility, the 
energy of the will to struggle and to work were not 
paralysed by his trust in God, his profound experience 
of the free grace of the Father, and his sense of the absolute 
sovereignty of the divine will. It was only stimulated 
by them to achieve greater ethical triumphs than ever 
before. For him as for Jesus, the primary incarnation and 
application of religion was in a sturdy morality of personal 
life, and the main qualities of the personal, ethical ideal 
which thus issues out of Christian faith are love, sincerity, 
simplicity, freedom and independence, purity, loyalty and 
gratitude. 

Nor does Paul fail to meet many of the problems of 
the social life as they emerge one by one in the experience 
of himself and his converts. Neither a politician nor a 
social reformer in the narrow sense, yet he does devote a 
great deal of attention to the most important social 
institutions to marriage and the family, nationality and 
the State. He may have been mistaken in his judgment 
with regard to the proper Christian attitude towards 
slavery, marriage, the place of women or the Roman 
State, but for him as for Jesus, love, which includes active, 
unselfish service as its first element, was the root-principle 
of the Christian life, and he took it seriously and applied 
it intelligently. 

More than all in this connection, it must not be for- 
gotten that Paul was the effective creator of the Christian 
Church the greatest social institution in the history of 
the world. He has a clear vision of its social significance, 
and it becomes under his hand the germinating ground 
of a new world. In it there is neither bond nor free, 
neither rich nor poor, neither male nor female. It is a 
democracy of equals, each with his own work and function 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 249 

according to the grace which God has given him, and all 
living together as brothers in the peace and happiness 
that can come only from willing co-operation in unselfish 
service and good deeds. He may not have been always 
faithful to his principles, but his ideal of the Church, 
its life and its tasks, is a social contribution of supreme 
value to the world. 

2. We cannot here enter upon anything like a sketch 
of Paul's theology, but must be content with suggesting 
the main lines upon which a study of it for educational 
purposes should run. It certainly ought, first of all, to 
be studied in close relation to his work as a missionary, 
a teacher and apologist. 

THEOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK 

For these purposes he succeeded in putting his message 
into a form more or less metaphysical which reads 
like a complete, finished, concrete, simple and clear story 
so far as its fundamental outline is concerned. It runs 
as follows : 

Christ, the Son of God, a superhuman, heavenly, 
Divine Being, in willing obedience to God the Father's 
behest came down from heaven in the fulness of time, 
was made man, and through His death and resurrection 
was " exalted to the right hand of God." By this means 
He has redeemed those who believe in Him from the 
flesh and sin, the law, death and Satan, and has thus 
brought to them the salvation of God of which the holy 
influence and working of the Holy Spirit of God and of 
Christ is the guarantee here and now. 

Under the presuppositions of that age it is a simple 
and a clear story, however strange it may sound to our 
modern ears. It was one of Paul's educational triumphs 
to have formulated such a story, and not the least of its 
merits for its time was its mythological character. To 
us it may not be so simple as it looks, for we have left 
the whole universe in which it moves far behind us ; 
but the people of the time questioned the possibility and 
probability of no word of it. To them the actors were 
all real, and the means adopted were all perfectly natural. 



250 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

In its separate elements it was no new theology created 
by Paul. Pagan thought was already familiar with 
divine beings who came down to earth, while the death 
and resurrection of these divine beings were not strange 
to them. Already, also, the Primitive Church had its pre- 
existent Christ, and they had seen in the Cross and Resur- 
rection their redemption. They knew the Holy Spirit, 
and in His marvellous working had found the earnest 
of their full salvation. What Paul did was to universalize 
their Christ, to set the Cross defiantly and triumphantly 
in the centre of the picture, to gather together the scattered 
elements of their beliefs into one complete and coherent 
drama of salvation, to enunciate it clearly, to proclaim 
it as something new and independent of Judaism, as well 
as to defend it vigorously against all attacks and to 
justify it with all the strength and subtlety of his specu- 
lative intellect. 



THREE MAIN LINES OF THOUGHT 

We do not, however, find in the Epistles of Paul any 
complete and unified system of theological doctrines 
elaborating this outline and framework, and covering 
systematically all its details. What we do find is that 
his mind seems, as a result of his needs as a missionary, 
to have been working in three different directions which 
correspond to three aspects of his life and work. There is, 
firstly, an Anti- Jewish Apologetic. Secondly, there are 
the elements of a theology designed .to support his Gentile 
Mission and to overcome paganism. Thirdly, there are 
in his letters numerous traces of a more or less original 
and independent theology which springs more directly 
out of his Christian experience and that of his converts. 

These three cycles of thought are constantly over- 
lapping one another in Paul's letters, and it is impossible 
to weld them together into one consistent system. That 
may, however, only be due to the fragmentary character 
of the letters as compared with Paul's own mind. So 
we must be content with giving a brief description of 
each one separately, so far as we can trace their character 
through scattered and occasional references and dis- 



THE APOSTLE PAUL AND HIS LETTERS 251 

cussions in Paul's letters. That seems to be the only way 
in which we can make them of real educational value, 
and the only way by which we can arrive at some under- 
standing and appreciation of the practical meaning of 
Paul's theological thinking. 



THE ANTI-JEWISH APOLOGETIC 

(a) The first line of thought was intended to meet 
Judaism, to defend and to justify the independence and 
superiority of the Gospel against Jewish attacks. This 
Anti-Jewish Apology is mainly concerned with the means 
of salvation, and discusses the relation between faith and 
law, works and grace, the Old Testament and the Law, 
bringing out the great contrasts between the new and the 
old religion. It uses the Jewish terms and ideas of the 
Christ, law, justification, sacrifice and propitiation, to 
interpret the personality and work of Jesus, to explain 
the character of His death and to describe the means and 
method of salvation. It starts with the dogma of the 
corruption of human nature and the inability of man to 
fulfil the whole law. It proceeds to the doctrines of the 
complete obedience to the demands of the law in the 
life of Christ, His death as the complete and final sacrifice 
for sin as well as the full satisfaction of the law, making 
the whole system of Jewish sacrifices useless, His Resur- 
rection proving the acceptance of that sacrifice by God. 
This line of thought finally issues in the doctrine of 
Justification by Faith and closes with eschatological 
doctrines of the final salvation in the Kingdom of God 
ushered in by the Parousia of Christ, the Last Judgment, 
and the Resurrection of the just, clothed in ' spiritual 
bodies. 1 

THE ANTI-PAGAN THEOLOGY 

(b) The second line of thought goes out to meet the 
Gentiles and supports the appeal of Paul's great mission 
to the Greek, Latin and Oriental pagan world. It uses 
Greek and Pagan terms and ideas of the Logos, incar- 
nation, the dying and rising again of divine Saviours, fear 



252 THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MODERN EDUCATION 

and dread of the world of demons, salvation and re- 
demption through a mystico-physical union with the 
divine by baptism, common sacrificial meals and other 
sacramental mystery-rites, as well as the idea of the con- 
tradiction and universal struggle between the flesh and 
the spirit combined with the belief in the immortality 
of the spirit when released from the bonds of the flesh. 
These terms and ideas are used in order to interpret to 
the pagan mind the personality and work of Jesus Christ 
as well as the method of salvation through Him. This 
line of thought also starts from the dogma of the cor- 
ruption of human nature, its sins in this case being 
against the law of conscience ; it proceeds to interpret 
the heathen gods as demons, from the evil power of whom 
men need deliverance ; or as mere images weak and in- 
effective . It sketches a doctrine of Christ as the Lord 
who is the incarnation of the Son of God in flesh to pro- 
cure full and final redemption from the curse and power of 
the flesh, the death and resurrection as the triumph of the 
spirit over the flesh or as the conquest over the world of 
evil demons. This the Son accomplishes in a repre- 
sentative capacity for the race of men, thereby winning for 
Himself a place " far above all rule and authority and 
every name that is named, not only in this world but also 
in that which is to come." This redemption from the 
flesh and from the power of demons may be shared by all 
men through faith, which has here a tendency to become a 
belief in this series of ' evangelic facts ' as well as trust in 
the Son of God. The salvation becomes the actual pos- 
session of the believer by the mystic sharing of Christ's 
death and resurrection which finds its expression in a 
sacramentarian doctrine of the Church, Baptism and the 
Lord's Supper. 

It is not meant that these two lines of thought are to 
be found in the writings of Paul separately and indepen- 
dently drawn. What is fairly clear is that the unsyste- 
matic theological thinking of the Apostle for apologetic 
and missionary purposes ran on both these lines, now 
on one, now on the other. They cross and recross each 
other at many points, while they run parallel to each 
other in