Victoria Ifoietor^ of the
Counties of Enolanb
EDITED BY WILLIAM PAGE, F.S.A.
A HISTORY OF
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
IN FOUR VOLUMES
VOLUME I
a a
THE
VICTORIA HISTORY
OF THE COUNTIES
OF ENGLAND
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
LONDON
ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE
AND COMPANY LIMITED
This History is issued to Subscribers only
By Archibald Constable & Company Limited
and printed by Eyre & Spottiswoode
H.M. Printers of London
INSCRIBED
TO THE MEMORY OF
HER LATE MAJESTY
QUEEN VICTORIA
WHO GRACIOUSLY GAVE
THE TITLE TO AND
ACCEPTED THE
DEDICATION OF
THIS HISTORY
THE
VICTORIA HISTORY
OF THE COUNTY OF
NOTTINGHAM
j
EDITED BY
WILLIAM PAGE, F.S.A.
VOLUME ONE
LONDON
j JAMES STREET
I HAYMARKET
DA
670
v. I
Counts Committee for TRotttngbamsbire
HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF PORTLAND, K.G., G.C.V.O.
Lord Lieutenant, Chairman
His GRACE THE DUKE OF NEWCASTLE
THE RT. HON. THE EARL MANVERS
THE RT. HON. THE EARL OF LIVERPOOL
THE RT. HON. THE VISCOUNT GALWAY
THE RT. REV. THE LORD BISHOP OF SOUTH-
WELL
THE RT. HON. THE LORD MIDDLETON
THE RT. HON. THE LORD BELPER
THE RT. HON. F. J. S. FOLJAMBE
THE RT. HON. JOHN E. ELLIS, M.P.
THE HON. FREDERICK STRUTT
SIR THOMAS WHITE, BART.
SIR CHARLES SEELY, BART.
SIR JOHN TURNEY, J.P.
THE WORSHIPFUL THE MAYOR OF RETFORD
HENRY ASHWELL, ESQ., J.P.
THE REV. ATWELL M. Y. BAYLAY, M.A.
THOMAS M. BLAGG, ESQ., F.S.A.
J. POTTER BRISCOE, ESQ., F.R.H.S.
THE REV. F. BRODHURST, M.A.
CORNELIUS BROWN, ESQ.
J. W. CARR, ESQ., F.L.S., F.G.S.
THE REV. CANON W. L. B. CATOR, M.A.
G. N. CHARLTON, ESQ., J.P.
GENERAL J. TALBOT COKE
COL. HENRY EYRE, C.B., D.L., J.P.
GEORGE FELLOWS, ESQ., J.P.
E. H. FRASER, ESQ., D.C.L.
THE REV. JAMES Gow, M.A., D.LiTT., HEAD
MASTER OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL
FRANK GRANGER, ESQ., D.Lrrr.
J. A. H. GREEN, ESQ.
W. W. HALL, ESQ., D.L., J.P.
JOHN HOLDEN, ESQ., D.L., J.P.
THE REV. RODOLPH BARON VON HUBE
W. LAMBE HUSKINSON, ESQ.
J. ALFRED JACOBY, ESQ., M.P.
WILLIAM H. MASON, ESQ., J.P.
THE REV. C. SUTTON MILLARD, B.A.
THE VEN. ARCHDEACON RICHARDSON, M.A.
MAJOR G. E. ROBERTSON
JOHN RUSSELL, ESQ., M.A.
F. A. SMITH, ESQ., J.P.
JOHN T. SPALDING, ESQ., J.P.
THE REV. JOHN STANDISH, B.A.
JOHN R. STARKEY, ESQ., M.P.
WILLIAM STEVENSON, ESQ.
WILLIAM H. STEVENSON, ESQ.
THE REV. PROFESSOR J. E. SYMES, M.A.
WILLIAM VICKERS, ESQ.
G. H. WALLIS, ESQ., F.S.A.
JAMES WARD, ESQ.
JOHN C. WARREN, ESQ., M.A.
B. J. WHITAKER, ESQ., D.L., J.P.
THE REV. R. H. WHITWORTH
T. CECIL S. WOOLLEY, ESQ.
J. H. YOXALL, ESQ., M.P.
Xlll
CONTENTS OF VOLUME ONE
PAGE
Dedication ............... v
The Advisory Council of the Victoria History . . vii
General Advertisement vii
The Nottinghamshire County Committee .......... xiii
Contents . . xv
List of Illustrations xvii
Preface xix
Table of Abbreviations xxi
Natural History
Introduction By Professor J. W. CARR, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S. . xxvii
Geology By Professor J. F. BLAKE, M.A., F.G.S. . . . i
Palaeontology . . . By R. LYDEKKER, F.R.S., F.L.S., F.G.S. . . -37
Botany By Professor J. W. CARR, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S.
Introduction ........ . . . . 41
Botanical Districts ............. 48
Vascular Plants .............51
Musci (Mosses) ............ .61
Hepaticae (Liverworts and Scale Mosses') . . . . . . . . .65
Algae ............... 66
Lichens ............... 67
Fungi ................ 68
Zoology
Molluscs . . . . By B. STURCES DODD and B. B. WOODWARD, F.L.S.,
F.G.S., F.R.M.S 75
Insects By Professor J. W. CARR, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S.
Aptera (S/ ring- tails and Bristle-tails) . . . . . . . . . 79
Orthoptera (Earwigs, Grasshoppers, etc.) ......... 80
Neuroptera (Dragon-flies, May-flies, Caddis-flies, etc.) . . . . . . .81
Hymenoptera (Ants, Bees, Saw-flics, Ichneumons, etc.) . . . . . . .83
Coleoptera (Beetles') 93
Lepidoptera (Butterflies and Moths') . . . . . . . . . .108
Diptera (Flies) . . .123
Hemiptera (Bugs, etc.) . . . . . . . . . . . .128
Myriapoda (Centipedes and MUR-
pedef) By Professor J. W. CARR, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S. . . 131
Spiders „ „ „ „ . 132
Crustaceans .... By the Rev. T. R. R. STEBBING, M.A., F.R.S., F.L.S. 141
Fishes By Professor J. W. CARR, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S. . . 152
Reptiles and Batrachians . „ „ „ „ ..155
Birds . . . . . By J. WHITAKER, F.Z.S., etc 156
Mammals .... By Professor J. W. CARR, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S. . . 177
CONTENTS OF VOLUME ONE
PACE
Early Man By Professor FRANK GRANGER, D.Litt. . . .183
Anglo-Saxon Remains ... By REGINALD A. SMITH, B.A., F.S.A. . . .193
Introduction to the Nottinghamshire
Domesday By F. M. STENTON, B.A. . ... 207
Text of the Nottinghamshire Domes-
day . „ „ „ . . 247
Ancient Earthworks . . . By W. STEVENSON ....... 289
Political History .... By Miss A. A. LOCKE, Honours School of Modern
History, Oxford . . . . . . • 3 ' 7
Forestry By the Rev. J. C. Cox, LL.D., F.S.A., and the Rev.
R. H. WHITWORTH . . . . . -365
xvi
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PAGE
Nottingham Castle. By WILLIAM HYDE .... . . frontispiece
Perforated Axe-head from Wollaton . \
Winged Celt from Colwick
\ full-page flate, facing 1 86
Bronze Socketed Spear-head from Gringley .
Bronze Implements from Nottingham . '
Section of Church Hole Cave, Creswell .... .191
Urn from Holme Pierrepont ... . ... .195
Bronze Gilt Brooch from Holme Pierrepont . . ... .196
Bronze Brooch from Holme Pierrepont ..... .... 196
Viking Sword from Farndon Church ... ... .197
Urn from Newark ..... • .... 202
Urn from Newark ....... ... . . 202
Iron Sword from Nottingham . . \
Iron Spear-head with Cross-bar, London I
Bronze-gilt Brooch from Tuxford . V . - full-page plate, facing 202
Iron Spear-head from Nottingham
Sword Pommel from Nottingham . '
Bronze Brooch from Brough . . . . . . . - . . . .203
Bronze Ring-brooch from Nottingham . . . . . . . . . .204
Ancient Earthworks
Combs Farm Camp, Farnsfield ... . .291
Nottingham Castle and Precincts . ...... ... 292
Castle Hill, Worksop . . . .293
Blidworth Camp • 294
Castle Hill, East Retford .... -294
Hill Close Camp, Farnsfield . . - 295
Beacon Hill Camp, Gringley on the Hill . . 296
Winny Hill Camp, Mansfield Woodhouse . . . 296
Camp at Oxton. . . • 298
Castle Hill, Thurgarton . • 298
Woodborough Camp ... -299
Camp in Hollinwood Hill, Arnold ... . 300
Castle Hill, Car Colston ... .300
Kingshaugh Camp, Darlton . • • • • 3°'
Castle Hill Camp, Kirkby in Ashfield . . . • 3°3
Camp at Lonely Grange, Oxton . .... . 303
Camp on Burgage Hill, Southwell • 3°4-
Jordan Castle, Wellow • 3°4
xvii
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
PAGE
Ancient Earthworks (continued)
Castle Hill, Annesley • 3°5
Earthworks at Aslockton . ... • • 3°6
Gaddick Hill, Egmanton . .... 306
Laxton Castle • 3°7
Sibthorpe .... • • . . 310
Greasley Castle • • • -311
LIST OF MAPS
Geological Map between xxx, I
Orographical Map . . . • • • • • • • • • » '8, I9
Botanical Map. . . ....... 40, 41
Pre-Historical Map „ 182, 183
Anglo-Saxon Map . „ 192, '93
Domesday Map ........ „ 246, 247
Ancient Earthworks Map „ 288, 289
xvin
PREFACE
\
SO much of the County of Nottingham was covered on its north
and east sides by the Forest of Sherwood that the early history
of this district is comparatively slight. Nottinghamshire can,
however, claim to possess one of the oldest county histories in
Dr. Robert Thoroton's Antiquities of Nottinghamshire, published in 1677.
Though not perhaps equal to its contemporary the History of Warwick-
shire, by Dugdale, it is a work of considerable research, and has remained
till now the only history of the county, for John Throsby's History of
Nottinghamshire published in 1 797 is practically a reprint of Thoroton's
work, with a few additions to the text and illustrations.
The Editor wishes to express his thanks to Mr. J. Horace Round,
M.A., LL.D., for his help and suggestions regarding the articles on the
Domesday Book and Political History ; to Mr. G. H. Wallis, F.S.A.,
director of the Art Museum, Nottingham Castle, for assistance in many
ways ; to Mr. I. Chalkley Gould, F.S.A., for notes relating to the earth-
works of the county ; and to the Society of Antiquaries, the British
Archaeological Society, and Sir John Evans, K.C.B., for the use of blocks.
XIX
TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS
Abbrev. Plac. (Rec.
Com.)
Acts of P.C. . .
Add
Add. Chart. . .
Admir
Agarde ....
Anct. Corresp. .
Anct. D. (P.R.O.)
A 2420
Ann. Mon. .
Antiq
App
Arch
Arch. Cant. . .
Archd. Rec. . .
Archit
Assize R. . . .
Aud. Off. ...
Aug. Off. ...
Ayloffe . . .
Bed
Beds
Berks ....
Bdle
B.M
Bodl. Lib. . . .
Boro
Brev. Reg. .
Brit
Buck
Bucks
Cal
Camb. . .
Cambr
Campb. Ch.
Cant
Carl .....
Cart. Antiq. R.
C.C.C. Camb. .
Certiorari Bdles.
(Rolls Chap.)
Chan. Enr. Decree
R.
Chan. Proc. . .
Chant. Cert.
Chap. Ho. .
Charity Inq.
Chart. R. 20 Hen.
III. pt. i. No. 10
Abbreviatio Placitorum (Re-
cord Commission)
Acts of Privy Council
Additional
Additional Charters
Admiralty
Agarde's Indices
Ancient Correspondence
Ancient Deeds(Public Record
Office) A 2420
Annalcs Monastic!
Antiquarian or Antiquaries
Appendix
Archasologia or Archxological
Archaeologia Cantiana
Archdeacons' Records
Architectural
Assize Rolls
Audit Office
Augmentation Office
Ayloffe's Calendars
Bedford
Bedfordshire
Berkshire
Bundle
British Museum
Bodley's Library
Borough
Brevia Regia
Britain, British, Britannia, etc.
Buckingham
Buckinghamshire
Calendar
Cambridgeshire or Cambridge
Cambria, Cambrian, Cam-
brensis, etc.
Campbell Charities
Canterbury
Chapter
Carlisle
Cartae Antiquse Rolls
Corpus Christ! College, Cam-
bridge
Certiorari Bundles (Rolls
Chapel)
Chancery Enrolled Decree
Rolls
Chancery Proceedings
Chantry Certificates (or Cer-
tificates of Colleges and
Chantries)
Chapter House
Charity Inquisitions
Charter Roll, 20 Henry III.
part i. Number 10
Chartul
Chas
Ches
Chest
Ch. Gds. (Exch.
K.R.)
Chich
Chron
Close .
Co
Colch
Coll
Com
Com. Pleas .
Conf. R. . . .
Co. Plac. . . .
Cornw
Corp
Cott
Ct. R
Ct. of Wards . .
Cumb
Cur. Reg. .
D
D. and C. . . .
De Bane. R. . .
Dec. and Ord .
Dep. Keeper's Rep.
Derb
Devon . . . .
Dioc
Doc
Dods. MSS. . .
Dom. Bk. . . .
Dors
Duchy of Lane.
Dur
East
Eccl
Eccl. Com.
Edvv
Eliz
Engl
Engl. Hist. Rev. .
Enr
Epis. Reg. .
Esch. Enr. Accts. .
ExcerptaeRot. Fin.
(Rec. Com.)
Exch. Dep. . .
Exch. K.B. . .
Exch. K.R. . .
Exch. L.T.R.
Chartulary
Charles
Cheshire
Chester
Church Goods (Exchequer-
King's Remembrancer)
Chichester
Chronicle, Chronica, etc.
Close Roll
County
Colchester
Collections
Commission
Common Pleas
Confirmation Rolls
County Placita
Cornwall
Corporation
Cotton or Cottoniaii
Court Rolls
Court of Wards
Cumberland
Curia Regis
Deed or Deeds
Dean and Chapter
De Banco Rolls
Decrees and Orders
Deputy Keeper's Reports
Derbyshire or Derby
Devonshire
Diocese
Documents
Dodsworth MSS
Domesday Book
Dorsetshire
Duchy of Lancaster
Durham
Easter Term
Ecclesiastical
Ecclesiastical Commission
Edward
Elizabeth
England or English
English Historical Review
Enrolled or Enrolment
Episcopal Registers
Escheators Enrolled Accounts
Excerpta e Rotulis Finium
(Record Commission)
Exchequer Depositions
Exchequer King's Bench
Exchequer King's Remem-
brancer
Exchequer Lord Treasurer's
Remembrancer
XXI
Exch. of Pleas, Plea
R.
Exch. of Receipt .
Exch. Spec. Cora. .
Feet of F. . . .
Feod. Accts. (Ct. of
Wards)
Feod. Surv. (Ct. of
Wards)
Feud. Aids . . .
fol
Foreign R. . . .
Forest Proc. . .
TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS
Exchequer of Pleas, Plea Roll
Exchequer of Receipt
Exchequer Special Commis-
Feet of Fines
Feodaries Accounts (Court of
Wards)
Feodaries Surveys (Court of
Wards)
Feudal Aids
Folio
Foreign Rolls
Forest Proceedings
Gaz Gazette or Gazetteer
Gen Genealogical, Genealogica,
etc.
Geo George
Glouc Gloucestershire or Gloucester
Guild Certif. (Chan.) Guild Certificates (Chancery)
Ric. II. Richard II.
Hants
Had.
Hen.
Heref.
Hertf.
Herts
Hil. .
Hist.
Hist. MSS. Com.
Hosp.
Hund. R. . .
Hunt. . . .
Hunts
Inq. a.q.d.
Inq. p.m.
Inst. . .
Invent. .
Ips. . .
Itin. .
Journ
Lamb. Lib.
Lane
L. and P. Hen.
VIII.
Lansd.
Ld. Rev. Rcc. . .
Leic
Le Neve's Ind.
Lib
Lich
Line
Lond.
m.
Mem.
Hampshire
Harley or Harleian
Henry
Herefordshire or Hereford
Hertford
Hertfordshire
Hilary Term
History, Historical,Historian,
Historia, etc.
Historical MSS. Commission
Hospital
Hundred Rolls
Huntingdon
Huntingdonshire
Inquisitions ad quod damnum
Inquisitions post mortem
Institute or Institution
Inventory or Inventories
Ipswich
Itinerary
James
Journal
Lambeth Library
Lancashire or Lancaster
Letters and Papers, Hen.
VIII.
Lansdowne
Land Revenue Records
Leicestershire or Leicester
Le Neve's Indices
Library
Lichfield
Lincolnshire or Lincoln
London
Membrane
Memorials
Memo. R. .
Mich
Midd
Mins. Accts. . .
Misc. Bks. (Exch.
K.R., Exch.
T.R. or Aug.
Off.)
Mon. . .
Monm. .
Mun. . .
Mus. . .
N. and Q. .
Norf. . .
Northampt.
Northants .
Northumb. .
Norw.
Nott. . .
N.S.
Off. . .
Orig. R.
O.S. . .
Oxf. .
Palmer's Ind. .
Pal. of Chest. . .
Pal. of Dur. . .
Pal. of Lane. .
Par
Parl
Parl. R
Parl. Surv. .
Partic. for Gts.
Pat
P.C.C
Pet
Peterb
Phil
Pipe R
Plea R
Pop. Ret. . . .
Pope Nich. Tax.
(Rec. Com.)
P.R.O
Proc
Proc. Soc. Antiq. .
pt.
Pub.
R
Rec. . . .
Recov. R. . .
Rentals and Surv.
Rep
Rev
Ric. .
Memoranda Rolls
Michaelmas Term
Middlesex
Ministers' Accounts
Miscellaneous Books (Ex-
chequer King's Remem-
brancer, Exchequer Trea-
sury of Receipt or Aug-
mentation Office)
Monastery, Monasticon
Monmouth
Muniments or Munimenta
Museum
Notes and Queries
Norfolk
Northampton
Northamptonshire
Northumberland
Norwich
Nottinghamshire or Notting-
ham
New Style
Office
Originalia Rolls
Ordnance Survey
Oxfordshire or Oxford
Page
Palmer's Indices
Palatinate of Chester
Palatinate of Durham
Palatinate of Lancaster
Parish, parochial, etc.
Parliament or Parliamentary
Parliament Rolls
Parliamentary Surveys
Particulars for Grants
Patent Roller Letters Patent
Prerogative Court of Canter-
bury
Petition
Peterborough
Philip
Pipe Roll
Plea Rolls
Population Returns
Pope Nicholas' Taxation (Re-
cord Commission)
Public Record Office
Proceedings
Proceedings of the Society of
Antiquaries
Part
Publications
Roll
Records
Recovery Rolls
Rentals and Surveys
Report
Review
Richard
xxn
TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS
Roff. .... Rochester diocese
Rot. Cur. Reg. . Rotuli Curiae Regis
Rut Rutland
Topog.
Sarum ....
Ser
Sess. R
Shrews
Shrops ....
Soc
Soc. Antiq. .
Soraers
Somers. Ho. . .
S.P. Dom. . . .
Staff. ....
Star Chamb. Proc.
Stat
Steph
Subs. R. . . .
SufF.
Surr
Suss
Surv. of Ch. Liv-
ings (Lamb.) or
(Chan.)
Salisbury diocese
Series
Sessions Rolls
Shrewsbury
Shropshire
Society
Society of Antiquaries
Somerset
Somerset House
State Papers Domestic
Staffordshire
Star Chamber Proceedings
Statute
Stephen
Subsidy Rolls
Suffolk
Surrey
Sussex
Surveys of Church Livings
(Lambeth) or (Chancery)
Trans.
Transl.
Treas.
Trin.
Univ. . .
Valor Eccl.
Com.)
Vet. Mon. .
V.C.H. . .
Vic. . . .
vol.
(Rec.
Warw. .
Westm. .
Westmld.
Will. .
Wilts .
Winton.
Wore.
Yorks
Topography or Topographi-
cal
Transactions
Translation
Treasury or Treasurer
Trinity Term
University
Valor Ecclesiasticus (Record
Commission)
Vetusta Monumenta
Victoria County History
Victoria
Volume
Warwickshire or Warwick
Westminster
Westmorland
William
Wiltshire
Winchester diocese
Worcestershire or Worcester
Yorkshire
XXlll
d
A HISTORY OF
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
AN INTRODUCTION TO
THE NATURAL HISTORY OF
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
NOTTINGHAMSHIRE, one of the north-midland counties of
England, is in form an irregular oval, about fifty miles in
length from north to south, and with a greatest width of about
twenty-six miles from east to west : its total area is about 844
square miles. Its political borders are formed by the counties of York,
Derby, Leicester and Lincoln, which bound it on the north, west, south
and east respectively. In the north-east portion of the county the river
Trent forms a natural boundary, as do also the Erewash and Soar, and
about three miles of the Trent, in the south-west, but elsewhere the
boundary is not formed by natural features, unless we except the few
insignificant lengths along which the Witham and one or two small
streams coincide with the county boundary. In its physical features
Nottinghamshire presents no very great diversity ; it possesses none of
the wild moorland or bold mountainous scenery of its neighbours on the
north and west. Along the course of the Trent, which stretches across
the southern and eastern parts of the county, are extensive areas of rich
low-lying pasture and arable land, but elsewhere the surface is for the
most part of a gently undulating character, rising in some places into
low ranges of hills, which attain their greatest altitude to the south and
west of Sutton-in-Ashfield, where there is a good deal of ground lying
above the contour line of 600 feet. The highest points indicated on the
last edition of the ordnance map are 651 feet at Hucknall-under-Huth-
waite ; 631 feet at Wild Hill, one mile north of the former station ;
and 629 feet and 614 feet respectively to the east and south-east of East
Kirkby. Of lesser height are the hills north of Blidworth (500 feet) ;
c The Plains ' in the immediate neighbourhood of Nottingham, which
rise to a height of 470 feet at Dorket Head, and 508 feet at Cockpit
Hill ; and the Wolds in the extreme south of the county, which just
reach 400 feet. On the other hand a great part of the eastern side of
the county lies below the 100 feet contour line, and in the Carr lands of
the extreme north we have an area much of which is less than i o feet
abo1. o sea level.
The most striking of the physical characteristics of Nottingham-
shire is however the beautiful park and woodland scenery of Sherwood
XXVll
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Forest, which occupies a considerable area on the western side of the
county, between Mansfield on the south and Worksop on the north.
Within this region, especially in the extensive woods known as the Birk-
lands and Bilhagh, may be seen some of the finest primeval woodland in
Britain ; the trees are mainly oak and birch, many of them, especially
the former, being evidently of great antiquity. Such are the celebrated
Major, Parliament, Shambles and Greendale Oaks. There is usually no
undergrowth beyond a dense and luxuriant carpet of bracken. Other
parts of the district, from which the old timber had long ago been
cleared, are now occupied by extensive plantations of oak, beech, larch
and other conifers, sweet-chestnut and other trees. The open forest and
park lands are dotted over with ancient thorn trees, often infested with
mistletoe ; the ground vegetation consists of various grasses with ling
and heath, gorse and bracken.
Nottinghamshire is almost entirely within the drainage area of the
Trent. This noble river, rising in the Staffordshire moors, enters the
county near its south-west corner, shortly after its junction with the
Derbyshire Derwent at Sawley, receives at once the waters of the Erewash
and Soar, and thence passing along the southern boundary of the city
of Nottingham, crosses the county in a north-easterly direction to
Newark, whence it flows almost due north, finally leaving the county
at West Stockwith, a village at the extreme north-east corner of
Notts. Among its purely Nottinghamshire tributaries are the Leen,
which rises in the Robin Hood Hills and flows into the canal at
Lenton, and thence into the Trent at Nottingham ; the Cocker Beck,
Dover Beck, and Greet from the north-west enter the Trent near Gun-
thorpe, Caythorpe and Fiskerton respectively ; the united waters of
the Smite and Devon rivers, flowing north from Leicestershire, join
the Newark branch of the Trent at Newark ; and finally at the ex-
treme north-east of the county the Trent is reinforced by the waters
of the Idle, a river formed by the union of the Ryton, Poulter, Meden,
Maun, and Vicar and Rainworth waters, which drain the Sherwood
Forest region. In the parks of Sherwood Forest several artificial
lakes of considerable size have been formed along the course of the
streams.
As before mentioned the county of Nottingham is in shape an ir-
regular, elongated oval, its long axis pointing somewhat N.E. and S.W.
It thus coincides in position with the general strike of the English sedi-
mentary rocks which accordingly run through it from end to end as long
bands of varying width. Owing to the narrowness of the county,
however, these bands are very few in number, and consequently there is
little variety in the nature of the rocks which form the surface, and
therefore of the scenery due to such diversity of geological forma-
tions.
By far the greater part of the surface of the county is occupied by
the Trias or New Red Sandstone, the two main divisions of which —
the Upper or Keuper and the Lower or Bunter— form broad bands, each
xxvin
NATURAL HISTORY
several miles across. On the eastern side of the county, for the southern
two-thirds of its length, the Trias is bordered by the lower beds of the
Lias, which form a narrow strip between the Keuper and the county
boundary. Between the Keuper and Lias is a band of Rhastic shales of
insignificant thickness. On the other side of the county the Permian
rocks occupy a long narrow area along the western border of the Bunter
beds ; and still further to the westward the Permian is followed by a
patch of Coal Measures — the easterly extension of the Derbyshire and
Yorkshire coalfield.
With the exception of the Drift deposits and the Alluvium of the
river valleys, the above are all the formations which occur in Notting-
hamshire.
In a county whose highest ground is only something over 600 feet
above sea-level it might be expected that the fauna and flora which
characterize the more mountainous parts of Derbyshire and Yorkshire
would be absent, as is indeed the case. Also an inland county must
necessarily compare unfavourably with one, such as Lincolnshire, which
enjoys all the advantages in flora and fauna that the possession of a long
line of coast confers. A further circumstance which tends to reduce the
number of species, especially of plants and molluscous animals, is the
absence of certain geological formations favourable to their occurrence ;
even the narrow band of Magnesian Limestone which occurs along the
western border of the county, and is the only calcareous rock formation
that we possess, is largely spoiled for botanical and faunistic purposes by
the long line of collieries and colliery villages with their attendant net-
work of railway lines which follow its outcrop. Moreover the high
state of cultivation of by far the greater part of the county, and the
almost entire absence of undrained bog or marsh land account for the
absence at the present day of many forms of life which may once have
existed here.
Still, in spite of all these disadvantages, it will be found from the
appended lists that we possess a fauna and flora of considerable richness
and variety. Many groups, both of animals and plants, are still however
only very imperfectly worked out, and very much still remains to be done
before we can form any accurate idea of the full extent of our organic
wealth.
XXIX
GEOLOGY
IN relation to the general geological structure of England the city
of Nottingham occupies a peculiar position. If a line be drawn
from the mouth of the Tees and follow a course along the vale of
York and the lower basin of the Trent on their western sides, and
thence by the Soar and Avon to the east side of the vale of Severn to
terminate at the mouth of the Exe, there will be found on the west side
of it all the older, or Palaeozoic, rocks and the bulk of the manufactur-
ing centres, and on the east side of it most of the newer, or Neozoic,
rocks and of the purely agricultural land. This dividing line passes
through Nottingham.
Again, in the northern half of England the surface is dominated by
a single line of elevation along the axis of the Pennine range from north
to south ; but in the southern half the lines of elevation are shorter
and irregular in direction, more especially in the Midland district. Not-
tingham lies at the extreme southern end of the Pennine axis.
As a result of this position we find in Nottinghamshire the youngest
members of the Palaeozoic division and the oldest members of the Neo-
zoic division of rocks, and a development both of coal mining and of
agricultural industries. We find also the several successive rock forma-
tions sloping, or having a dip, to the east away from the Pennine axis
until they approach the southern border, where several of them die out
altogether and others change their direction.
In systematic geology the bedded rocks of Nottinghamshire are
classed under four systems : the CARBONIFEROUS, PERMIAN, TRIASSIC and
JURASSIC, of which the two former are Palaeozoic and the two latter are
Neozoic. Besides these there are the superficial deposits which lie in-
discriminately on all the bedded strata. A complete table of formations,
described in ascending order, follows on the next page.
THE CARBONIFEROUS SYSTEM
The whole of the Carboniferous system as developed at the southern
end of the Pennine axis, if we include the rocks easily reached by bor-
ing, is found within the county. The members of the system are : i .
The Carboniferous or Mountain Limestone (marked da on the Geological
Survey maps) ; 2. The Yoredale Shales (dj ; the Millstone Grit (dj ; and
the Cdal-Measures (dj, including the three subdivisions, Lower, Middle
and Upper Coal-Measures.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
TABLE OF FORMATIONS MET WITH IN NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
System
Formation
Subdivisions
Maximum local
thickness in feet
[Superficial]
Local
Blown Sand
Black Earth and Loam
Alluvium
River Gravel ....
Cave Earth
30
2O
Glacial
Chalky Gravel
Chalky Boulder Clay . .
Western Gravel
Western Boulder Clay
70
5°
Liassic
Lower Lias
i5o(?)
Jurassic
Rhaetic
White Lias
Black Shales with Bone
Bed
18
is
Keuper
Keuper Marls ....
Keuper Sandstones or
Waterstones ....
| „.
Bunter
Upper Red Sandstone.
Pebble Beds
Lower Red Sandstone
616
233
Upper Marls ....
Upper Limestone .
Lower Marls and Sand-
stones
89
53
148
Permian
Small-grained Dolomite &
Magnesian Limestone .
Marl Slate
Breccia
255
185
12
Carboniferous
Upper Carboniferous
Upper Coal-Measures
Middle Coal-Measures
Lower Coal-Measures
Millstone Grit ....
53°
2,480
820
720
Lower Carboniferous
Yoredale Shales.
Mountain Limestone .
Not pierced
GEOLOGY
The CARBONIFEROUS LIMESTONE, with the YOREDALE SHALES, which
gradually replace it towards the north, was laid down over an enormous
area extending to the borders of Wales on the west, to the lowlands of
Scotland on the north, to an unknown distance to the east, but having
its southern margin in Leicestershire and Derbyshire on the confines of
Notts. In this direction it is definitely bounded by a ridge of older rocks
running east and west. These come to the surface in Charnwood Forest
and are met with in both directions in borings east and west of Leicester.1
Now both the Limestone and the Shales are seen at the surface at Ticknall
in east Derbyshire, and if these follow the line of their common boundary
they will certainly enter Nottinghamshire, without any overlying Coal-
Measures but covered only by Neozoic strata, along a line from Remp-
stone to Upper Broughton. They probably occur also as basal rocks
throughout the whole county, but at too great a depth to be reached.
The same may be said of the MILLSTONE GRIT which comes to the
surface at Melbourne and Castle Donnington. It will continue eastward
underground across the Soar into Nottinghamshire along a line from
Kingston-upon-Soar to Widmerpool. It has actually been found beneath
the Coal-Measures at a depth of 1,150 feet in a boring at Ruddington,
which was continued for a depth of 720 feet in it.
The COAL-MEASURES, or group of strata in which are found seams of
coal thick enough to be profitably worked, are the lowest rocks which
actually come to the surface in the county, of which they occupy about
36 square miles. They form part however of an immense coalfield ex-
tending continuously into Derbyshire and Yorkshire, and formerly united
to the now separated coalfields of Lancashire and north Staffordshire.
This former union is shown by the recognized identity of the ' Black
Shale ' coal of Derbyshire and Notts with the ' Silkstone ' of Yorkshire
and the 'Arley Mine ' of Lancashire, and by the occurrence of the same
kinds of Upper Coal-Measures in Notts and north Staffordshire.
The materials of which the Coal-Measures are formed consist of beds
of sandstone and grit of various thicknesses interspersed with beds of
shale or bind and occasional beds of coal and other special rocks, such
as clunch, gannister and ironstone. It is probably seldom realized by
those who have no mining experience how small is the amount of coal in
comparison with the rest of the series. Thus out of i ,900 feet of strata
from the top of the Coal-Measures to the lowest workable seam2 pierced
near Nottingham only 83 feet consists of actual coal, and much of that
is too thin to be worked. For this reason outcrops of coal are seldom
or never now seen at the natural surface, but only in cuttings or in clay
and stone pits.
The best idea of the Coal-Measure strata of Nottinghamshire may
be obtained from the cuttings on the canal side near Wollaton ; the rail-
way cuttings between Radford and Trowell3 (formerly) and at Kimberley;
1 Harrison, Pnc. Birm. Phil. Soc. vol. ii.
3 Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 71, N.E. (3 sections).
3 Irving, Pnc. Geol. AIIOC. vol. vi.
3
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
and the openings for clay near Wollaton and for stone on Trowell Moor;
though some of these are now poor. The alternations of sandstone and
shale give rise, by their different ways of weathering, to very undulating
country, usually well clothed with vegetation. The fresh exposures of
the harder rocks are of peculiar art 'shades with a predominant neutral
tint.
The Nottinghamshire coals burn to an ash and have a composition
exemplified by one from Shireoaks, analyzed by C. Tookey :' —
Carbon 77'4°
Hydrogen 4'9&
Oxygen and Nitrogen 9^32
Sulphur 0-92
Ash 3-90
Water and loss 3'5o
lOO'OO
Some varieties called ' splint ' coal show a very bright ' face ' when split,
and, in others, extra bright bands may be seen standing out from the parts
which consists of loose dust. The bright bands are cross sections of the
broken tree stems of Sigillaria, etc., the surface markings of which are
sometimes seen when the fracture lies in a suitable direction. The
loose dust, often called ' mother-of-coal,' if carefully handled and suit-
ably examined under the microscope, is seen to consist of the disc-bearing
cells of some kind of gymnospermous tree, probably of Cordaites.
In Clifton Colliery a bed of ' Cannel ' coal is found between the
' Waterloo ' and ' Deep Soft ' seams. This kind of coal has no definite
structure in it and is supposed to be the result of the decomposition of
the material of ordinary coal, and its deposition as a water-borne sedi-
ment. It contains, instead of plant stems, the spines, scales, vertebras
and teeth of ganoid fishes referred to the genera Ctenacantbus, Gyracan-
thus and Megalichthys. It is also more gaseous than ordinary coal, as its
name implies.
Clunch and gannister are materials which form the bed next below
any coal seam. In the case of all the coal seams of Nottinghamshire, as
far as known, it is clunch that is found. This is a kind of kneaded up
clay, without internal stratification, and often showing the remains of
the roots of the plants which have made the overlying coal. It is also
called ' underclay ' and ' seat-earth.' The clunch is often valuable as a
fireclay, but is little worked in Nottinghamshire, less than 9,000 tons of
it being raised in 1901, against nearly 68,000 tons from Derbyshire.
Gannister is a hard siliceous band found in the same position beneath
certain coals with which marine remains are associated, but it has not
been definitely recognized in Nottinghamshire.
The largest of the roots found associated with the underclay is the
Stigmaria. This usually stands upright and has a diameter of 1 8 inches
and upwards. In a downward direction it branches into four parts, each
1 Percy, Metallurgy, vol. i.
4
GEOLOGY
marked with rootlet scars. It is cut off above by the horizontal coal
seam, in which it appears lost, but on the other side of the seam the
stem corresponding to the root may sometimes be seen standing upright
above it. These roots are most abundant below the ' Top Hard' seam.
They have long been known in the Newcastle Colliery at Old Basford,
one being preserved in the museum at the University College, Notting-
ham, and some specially fine examples accompanied by the correspond-
ing stems have been described by Mr. Shipman from the same horizon
elsewhere.1 In one of these, found at Bulwell, the stem belonged to
Sigillaria and had a diameter of 5 ft. 6 in. and a length preserved, now
filled in with sand, of 7 ft. 6 in. In another, found at Newstead, the
stem was Lepidodendron, and had a diameter of 9 feet and a length pre-
served of 7 feet. At a little higher level similar trees of smaller diameter,
3-4 feet, are found. Such trees can only be seen in the mines themselves,
as they are too large to bring up.
The ironstone occurs in a peculiar form. It does not form a rock-
bed but consists of concretionary nodules hardened by compounds of
iron. These nodules occur in great numbers at various horizons and
often contain the remains of some organism embedded in them, such as
a bivalve shell or a fern. The bivalve shells, named Anthracosia? belong to
the family Unionida or ' freshwater mussels,' hence the beds containing
them are called ' mussel bands.' The two principal species are A .
robusta and A. acuta. The ferns are most commonly of the genera
Neuropteris and Alethopteris . The most remarkable fossil from these
nodules, found by Mr. E. Wilson in i 876 at Skegby New Colliery near
Mansfield, consists of five abdominal segments and a pair of pincers of a
scorpion, described and figured by Dr. H. Woodward 3 under the name
of Eoscorpius anglicus, being the first of its kind found in England.
The roof of a coal seam, or stratum immediately following it, is
generally much richer in organisms, or perhaps more frequently examined,
than other portions of the strata, and constantly contains fragments of
such plants as Spbenopteris^ Aster ophyllites, etc., but these have not as yet
been adequately studied in Nottinghamshire.
All the fossils hitherto mentioned, with the possible exception of
the fishes, are inhabitants of the land or fresh water ; and although in
other coalfields marine organisms occur at various horizons they have not
till lately been found in Nottinghamshire, probably from the scarcity of
opportunities. However, in the sinking of the shaft at Gedling (vide
infra) specimens ofLingu/a, Discina and Aviculopecten have been discovered
in bands, both connected with or unconnected with the coal seams in
that part of the Coal-Measures usually supposed to be characterized by
their absence.4
Notwithstanding, however, these proofs of occasional submergence,
as in other coalfields, the Coal-Measures exposed or worked in Notting-
hamshire are essentially non-marine, as is further shown by the remark-
1 Nott. Nat. Sue. Transaction! for 1 894. 2 Also called Carbonicola.
8 Quart. Journ. Geol. Sac. vol. xxxii. 4 Geol. Survey, 'Summary of Progress for 1902.'
5
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
able phenomena known as ' wash-outs.' A wash-out or ' dumb-fault ' is
discovered in working a coal seam by the sudden dying out of the coal
and its replacement by a mass of sandstone apparently pressed into it from
above. This sandstone may continue for many yards, but if the ' stone-
heading ' is continued far enough it may reach the other side of the
wash-out and enter the coal seam again. If the sandstone is traced in a
direction transverse to such a heading it is found to have the form of a
long, sometimes branching trough. The material filling this trough is
often false bedded and includes fragments of coal, bind, fossiliferous iron-
stone, etc., which have been brought from a distance.
The occurrence of a wash-out in this district was first shown by
Lieut. G. E. Coke l in the ' Deep Hard ' Coal on the borders of the
county, but they have since been described by Mr. J. Shipman3 as occur-
ring on two horizons in the Leen Valley workings. Such a wash-out in
the Newcastle Colliery affects the ' Top Hard ' coal and has a breadth
of 300 yards. It has been traced in a transverse direction for more than
a mile. In the Newstead Colliery a wash-out affects the ' Comb ' coal
and the strata above it. Its breadth varies from 50 to 250 yards, and
its depth is about 25 feet. It has been traced taking a winding but
generally N.E. or E.N.E. course for a distance of 3 miles, and has a
tributary joining it on the right hand side at the main bend. Its base
is uneven and rutted, and the channel deepens towards the N.E., the
upper end being probably the continuation of a wash-out formerly met
with in the Annesley Colliery. A third wash-out has been seen in the
' Deep Soft ' coal at Wollaton, having a breadth of 1 5 yards and a depth
of 6 feet. In this case, as in that at the Newcastle Colliery, but in a more
marked degree, the wash-out is coincident with a downward roll of the
strata beneath, which was doubtless the original cause of the wash-out
taking the course it did. A wash-out can only be produced on a land
surface by a stream running on the level of the coal seam and wearing
away a furrow which is afterwards filled with the next succeeding kind
of deposit. It is an example of contemporaneous erosion.
Another example of this kind of erosion on a far larger scale is that
of the Red Rock of Rotherham, which has also been met with in Notts.
This is a massive sandstone 200 ft. in thickness which lies so irregularly
on the earlier measures that it was thought at one time to be Permian.
The question of its age was however definitely settled by the occurrence
of a coal seam — the ' Manor ' coal — above it in the Shireoaks Colliery.
Its irregularity is therefore a mere accident of deposit.
With these exceptions the whole of the Coal-Measures belong to a
single conformable series of deposits, of which the most constant as well
as the most easily recognized are the coal seams themselves. The follow-
ing is a list of all the coals that have received names in the county of
Nottingham, beginning with the highest.
1 trans. Chester jwld and Mid. Count. Inst. of Engineers, vol. xvi. 1888.
1 Nott. Nat. Soc. Tram, for 1894.
GEOLOGY
TABLE I. THE NAMED COALS OF THE NOTTINGHAM COALFIELD
MANOR ....
SHAFTON . . .
BAGSHAW
SWINTON POTTERY
CLOWN ....
ABDY or WINTER .
FURNACE . . .
BEAMSHAW . . .
KENTS THIN .
HAZLES ....
COMB ....
TOP HARD .
DUNSIL ....
WATERLOO . . .
Hoo CANNEL .
DEEP SOFT . . .
DEEP HARD . .
PIPER ....
TUPTON or FURNACE
Low MAIN .
THREE-QUARTERS
YARD or DOGTOOTH
BLACK SHALE .
KILBURN. . . .
NAUGHTON .
ALTON
Shireoaks, above the Rotherham Red Rock
Southcar, below the Rotherham Red Rock
Southcar, above the Oaks Rock
Southcar, below the Oaks Rock
Shireoaks and Leen Valley = WATHWOOD in Yorkshire
Southcar
Shireoaks and Leen Valley ) n ...
Southcar } P°SSlbl>' eclual
Southcar
Shireoaks and Leen Valley = KENTS THICK at Southcar
Leen Valley = BARNSLEY SOFT (?) at Southcar
Nottingham District = BARNSLEY HARD at Southcar, and in Yorkshire
Nottingham District = SWALLOW WOOD in Yorkshire
Nottingham District = LIDGET in Yorkshire
Clifton Colliery
Nottingham District = FLOCKTON in Yorkshire
Nottingham District = FENTON'S in Yorkshire
Nottingham District
Kimberley and Cossall = PARKGATE in Yorkshire
Tevershall = THORNCLIFFE THIN in Yorkshire
Tevershall = FOUR FEET in Yorkshire
Tevershall = CLOD in Derbyshire = SILKSTONE in Yorkshire
Kimberley and Cossall
Ruddington boring
Ruddington boring
The numerous sinkings by shaft or boring that have been made to
reach the coal, mostly where covered by newer strata, have thrown great
light upon the succession, thickness and position of the strata, as may be
seen by the following examples, showing successive parts of the series
from the summit to the base.1
I. BORING AT THURGARTON
commences 60 ft. above O.D.
(Communicated by G. E. Coke)
Trias and Permian, 850 ft.
Upper Measures — Keele Series .
„ „ Newcastle Series .
„ „ Etruria Marls . 256
Measures . 620
ft.
188
92
I. (a) SHAFT at GEDLING
commences 190 ft. above O.D.
(Communicated by G. E. Coke)
Trias and Permian, 513 ft. ft.
Upper Measures — Etruria Marls . 93
Measures with thin coals .... 762
Top Hard Coal
Total Coal-Measures .
.1,156
Total Coal-Measures . . 855
I. (i>) BORING AT SCARLE
commences 60 ft. above O.D.
. H. Da/ton, Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 83)
Gravel and Lias to Permian, 2,022 ft. ft.
Upper Coal-Measures 10
Total Coal-Measures . 10
1 The thicknesses of the coals are included in the Measures overlying them, which are taken to the
base of the coal seam.
7
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
II. BORING AT SOUTHCAR ON THE IDLE
commences 15 ft. above O.D.
(Dunstan, Mid. Inst. Civ. and Meek. Eng.
Proc. vol. xiv.)
Alluvium, Triassic and Permian, 1,728 ft.
ft.
Mottled Shale, with a 6 in. limestone 9
Rotherham Red Rock, with 9 ft.
mottled shales near the top. . . 96
Measures with 3 thin seams . . . 1 1 8
Shafton Coal, 3 ft. I in.
Measures with Bagshaw seam . . 469
Oaks Rock, 94 ft. ; Swinton Pottery
seam, 3 ft. 9 in. ; and measures
with 6 thin seams including Abdy,
Winter and Kents Thin .... 608
Kents Thick Coal, 4 ft. 5 in.
Measures 130
Barns/ey Soft Coal, 4ft. 9 in.
Measures 39
Barnsley Hard Coal, 4 ft. 7 in.
Measures . i o
Total Coal-Measures .
',479
II. (a) SHAFT AT SHIREOAKS NEAR WORKSOP
commences 200 ft. above O.D.
(Lancaster and Wright, Quart. Journ. Geol.
Sac. vol. xvi.)
Permian, 215 ft.
ft.
Measures with Manor Coal, 2 ft. and
bands of Ironstone 57
Rotherham Red Rock 198
Measures with 15 thin coals . . . 546
Clown or Wathwood Coal, 4 ft. 4 in.
Measures with coal seam, 2 ft. 8 in. 266
Haz/es Coal, 3 ft.
Measures with 2 thin coals . . . 241
Top Hard Coal, 3 ft. 9 in.
Measures 114
Total Coal-Measures .
1,422
III. SILVER HILL COLLIERY, TEVERSHALL,
commences at 545 ft. above O.D.
(M.E. Colliery Guardian, vol. Ixiii.)
ft.
Measures
Top Hard Coal, 5 ft. 6 in.
Measures
Dunsil Coal, 4 ft.
Measures
Water loo Coal, 2 ft. 7 in.
Measures
Deep Hard Coal, 2 ft. 7 in.
Measures
Piper Coal, 2 ft. 8 in.
Measures
Low Main Seam, 4 ft. 9 in.
Measures with Three-quarters Coal,
2 ft. I O in. and Tard Coal, 3 ft. 4 in. 1 88
Black Shale Coal, 2 ft. 10 in.
'53
63
ni
543
3°
III. (a) NEW HUCKNALL COLLIERY
commences at 500 ft. above O.D.
(M.E. Colliery Guardian, vol. Ixviii.)
ft.
Measures 450
Top Hard Coal, 4 ft. 2 in.
Measures 51
Dunsil Coal, 2 ft. 4 in.
Measures 1 1 1
Waterloo Coal, 3 ft. 9 in.
Measures 348
Deep Soft Coal, i ft. 9 in.
Measures 123
Deep Hard Coal, 3 ft. 3 in.
Measures 129
Low Main Seam, 4 ft.
Total Coal-Measures . . .1,256
Total Coal-Measures .
. 1,212
8
GEOLOGY
IV. NEW WOLLATON COLLIERY
commences 200 ft. above O.D.
(M.E. Colliery Guardian, vol. Ixviii.)
ft.
33
Measures with i coal seam
Top Hard Coal
Measures with 2 coal seams . . . 105
Dunsil Coal
Measures 54
Waterloo Coal
Measures with 2 coal seams . . . 360
Deep Soft Coal
Measures 42
Deep Hard Coal
Measures 30
Piper Coal
Total Coal-Measures
624
V. LODGE COLLIERY, NEAR EASTWOOD
commences at 210 ft. above O.D.
(M.E. Colliery Guardian, vol. Ixviii.)
ft.
Measures 15
Deep Soft Coal, 3 ft. 3 in.
Measures 44
Deep Hard Coal, 3 ft.
Measures 54
Piper Coal, 3 ft. 3 in.
Measures 81
Furnace Coal, 3 ft. 6 in.
Measures with Three-quarters Coal . 362
= Dogtooth Coal, i ft. 5 in.
Black Shale Coal (worthless)
Measures 235
Kilburn Coal, 2 ft. 3 in.
Total Coal-Measures . . 791
VI. BORING AT RUDDINGTON
commences at 120 ft. above O.D.
(Communicated by G. E. Coke)
Trias, 684 ft.
Measures 261
Naughton Coal
Measures 169
Alton Coal
Measures 45
Millstone Grit, 721 ft.
ft.
IV. (a) CLIFTON COLLIERY, NOTTINGHAM
commences 82 ft. above O.D.
(M.E. Colliery Guardian, vol. Ixiii.)
Gravels and Bunter, 361 ft.
Measures 21
Comb Coal, 2 ft. 8 in.
Measures 120
Top Hard Coal, 6 ft.
Measures
Dunsil Coal, 3 ft.
Measures
Waterloo Coal, 3 ft. 3 in.
Measures with 5 seams ....
Hoo Cannel Coal, 9 in.
Measures with 3 coal seams and iron-
stone bed 221
Deep Soft Coal, 5 ft.
Measures 42
Deep Hard Coal, 5 ft. 7 in.
Measures 42
Piper Coal, 3 ft. 4 in.
75
27
177
Total Coal-Measures.
725
V. (a) COSSALL COLLIERY
commences at 300 ft. above O.D.
(M.E. Colliery Guardian, vol. Ixviii.)
ft.
33
Measures
Piper Coal, 3 ft. 9 in.
Measures with thick sandstone and
one coal seam 105
Furnace Coal, 3 ft. 7 in.
Measures with thick sandstone and
Dogtooth coal 528
Kilburn Coal, 3 ft. 10 in.
Total Coal-Measures . 666
Total Coal Measures .
475
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
These sections taken together afford a fairly complete view of the
development of the Coal-Measures in the county. On comparing the
thicknesses of the strata between well known seams there does not appear
to be quite so great a constancy as is claimed in Yorkshire.
Possibly the seams called by the same name in different collieries are
not always exactly on the same horizons. One may die out and
another take its place above or below it. The total thickness will vary
according to the sections selected for addition, but if there are added
together 536 feet for the Upper Measures at Thurgarton, 1,250 feet for
the Rotherham Red Rock to the Top Hard coal at Shireoaks, 584 feet
to the Piper coal at Clifton, 678 feet to the Kilburn coal at Lodge
Colliery, and 476 feet for the measures at Ruddington boring, which
commences below the Kilburn coal — we obtain a total of 3,524 feet.
Considering this great thickness, and that there is no sign of thinning
out on the east side of the county, nor of the assumption of a westerly
dip, there cannot be a doubt that the whole of Nottinghamshire, with
the exception of a narrow band along its southern margin, is underlaid
by Coal-Measures, mostly at less than the maximum depth of working,
and these measures may extend also to any distance beneath Lincolnshire
and perhaps even the German Ocean.1
Regarding the Coal-Measures of Great Britain as a whole
geologists have divided them into three series, Lower, Middle and
Upper. The Lower Series, where characteristically developed, are dis-
tinguished by containing abundance of marine fossils, and by some of
their coals having a seat earth of siliceous gannister instead of clunch.
Such are principally found in the northern coalfields. The Middle Series
are more entirely freshwater in origin and contain abundant coal seams
with nodular bands of ironstone in all the midland coalfields. The
Upper Series contain many ironstone beds and ironstained red shales with
no workable coals, or very few, in the northern part of their range, but
form very rich coalfields in the southern. These divisions correspond
to changes in the accompanying plant remains, and possibly indicate also
that conditions favourable to coal-growth gradually advanced from north
to south.
The geographical position of Nottinghamshire, near the centre of
the English coalfields, prepares us for the statement that the greater
part of its coal-bearing strata belong to the Middle Series. No gan-
nister beds as above defined are known to come nearer to Nottingham
than Crich. We must necessarily however call those beds Lower Coal-
Measures that intervene between recognized Middle Coal-Measures and
Millstone Grit even in ignorance of their possessing such characteristics.
In this case the line between these and the Middle Series must be chosen
from considerations elsewhere derived. It is by the Geological Survey
drawn for convenience below the Black Shale, Clod or Silkstone coal,
which is widespread and constant. All the beds below these are there-
1 See Dunstan, loc. cit.
10
GEOLOGY
fore Lower Coal-Measures, including the Kilburn coal and all the
Measures in the Ruddington boring.
The Upper Series have been recognized by Mr. Walcot Gibson l
in the cores from the boring at Thurgarton above the ordinary Middle
Measures, by their resemblance in character and succession to those of
north Staffordshire, which he names in ascending order the Etruria
Marls, the Newcastle-under-Lyme Series and the Kee/e Series. At Gedling
a Lower Series, containing sphsrosiderites, called the Black Band Series,
has also been recognized in a diminished form.2 Mr. Gibson also
quotes the ferns Neuropteris rarinervis and Pecopteris miltoni, with Spheno-
phyllum and Cordaites as obtained in the uppermost beds in both counties,
though these are members also of the Middle Measures flora. The
relations of these beds to any definite coal seam of the Middle Series,
which was not ascertained at Thurgarton, is shown in the Gedling
shaft, where beneath 93 feet of red strata referred to the Etruria Marls
are found 762 feet of ordinary Measures above the Top Hard coal.
This thickness, if there is no error, is much less than that found at
Shireoaks (1,050 feet) or Southcar (1,364 feet) between the Top Hard
and the Rotherham Red Rock which lies below the shales called Upper
Coal-Measures in Yorkshire. If this portion of the series thins south-
ward some of the 1,000—1,300 feet of Measures which at Bestwood,
Linby and Annesley overlie the Top Hard may be expected to belong
to the Upper Series, and in fact their resemblance at Bestwood to the
beds at Scarle has been recognized.3 Now Professor Hull3 also recognized
the resemblance of the red shales at Scarle to the Upper Coal-Measures
of north Staffordshire, and Professor Green4 is said also to have recognized
the Measures above the Rotherham Red Rock at Southcar as the same
as at Scarle. This would seem to suggest that the Rotherham Red Rock
might be taken to be the local base of the Upper Series5 in the northern
part of the county.
The Coal-Measures have, of course, greatly changed their position
since they were laid down. Part of this change must have taken place
while the deposition of the series was still going on. Beds of coal with
their swampy seat earth and their fern-filled roofs must have been
originally formed near the sea level. If therefore the Kilburn coal near
the base and the Manor coal near the top of the series were deposited at
different times at approximately the same level there must have occurred,
between the two dates of their deposit, a sinkage of the ground of 2,700
feet. When room had thus been made for the Upper Measures and the
last of them had been deposited, the Carboniferous period ceased, and
there was a long interval before the next succeeding period of deposition
commenced.
During this interval the Pennine range was formed and the strata
on the east side obtained a dip to the east and were raised towards the
1 £>uart. Journ. Geol. Sac. vol. Ivii. a See 'Summary of Progress in 1902.'
3 See PitK. I nit. Civ, Eng. xlix. 159-68. * See Dunstan, loc. cit.
5 Sec Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 83.
II
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
west. We can now only ascertain the amount of this movement added
to all subsequent movements. This may be gathered from the deviation
from horizontality of a single wide-spread coal seam such as the Top
Hard, as shown in the following table obtained by subtracting the depth
of it in the sinking from the height above Ordnance Datum from which
the sinking commenced.
TABLE II. SHOWING THE POSITION OF THE TOP HARD COAL ABOVE OR BELOW
ORDNANCE DATUM AT VARIOUS SINKINGS
Wollaton New .
Hucknall New .
Kimberley.
Watnall ....
Broxtowe Wood.
Radford . . . .
Tevershall
Clifton ....
High Park, Greetly .
Newcastle colliery .
Clifton borehole .
Cinderhill .
ft.
200- 33 =
560- 45° =
-1- 110
425 — 324 =
+ IOI
346-370 =
234-294 =
24
60
530-651
82 — 2IO =
-107
- 121
- 128
340-513 '
- J73
150-400 =
82-498 '
213 — 660 =
-250
— 416
-447
ft.
Watnall New . . 424— 963 = — 539
Kirkby. . . . 360-1049 = • 689
Hucknall Torkard
No. i pit . . 300—1163 = — 863
Newstead . . . 416—1368 = — 952
Annesley . . . 460-1415 = 955
Linby .... 297-1287 = - 990
Hucknall Torkard
No. 2 pit . . 236-1230 = • 994
Bestwood . . . 228—1236 = -1008
Gedling . . . 190-1368 = -1178
Shireoaks . . . 200-1523 = -1323
Southcar . . . 15-319? = -3182
There was subsequently a great amount of removal of the Carboni-
ferous rocks by denudation, so that the Coal-Measures and Millstone
Grit are lacking in the central part of the original coalfield, where the
Mountain Limestone appears, and the Upper Series in Nottinghamshire
are separated from their equivalents in north Staffordshire. The amount
of material thus removed within the county before the Permian period
can be shown by means of Table III.
TABLE III. SHOWING THE POSITION ABOVE OR BELOW THE ORDNANCE DATUM OF THE
SURFACE OF THE COAL-MEASURES AT VARIOUS SINKINGS
Kimberley
Watnall New
Annesley .
Kirkby . .
Watnall . .
Linby .
Cinderhill . .
Hempshill
Bestwood .
Shireoaks
425- 26 =
424- 44
46O — IO8 =
360- 45 :
346- 50 =
297- 25 :
213- 25 =
244- 91 =
228 — 144 =
2OO-2I5 =
ft.
+ 399 Clifton ....
+ 380 Gedling . . .
+ 352 Chilwell . . .
+ 315 Clifton borehole .
-f- 296 Ruddington
+ 272 Edwalton .
+ 1 88 Thurgarton
+ 153 Owthorpe . . .
+ 84 Southcar .
15 Scarle . . . .
ft.
82-
I56 =
- 74
190 —
513 =
- 323
95-
462 =
- 367
82-
459 =
- 377
I2O —
699 =
- 579
IOO —
— 602
60-
850 =
- 79°
2OO —
1233 =
-1033
15-
1728 =
— 1713
60-
2O2O =
- 1960
On a comparison of these figures with those for the Top Hard
coal great differences in the amount of denudation appear, as shown in
Table IV.
12
GEOLOGY
TABLE IV. SHOWING THE THICKNESS OF COAL-MEASURES ABOVE THE TOP HARD COAL
LEFT AFTER PRE-PfiRMIAN (OR PRE-TRIASSIC *) DENUDATION
ft. ft.
*Clifton borehole 39 Kirkby 1004
*Clifton colliery 54 Bestwood 1092
Kimberley 298 Linby 1262
Watnall 320 Annesley 1302
Cinderhill 635 Shireoaks 1308
Gedling 855 Southcar 1469
Watnall New 919
In these tables there are several anomalies. The depths to the Top
Hard and to the surface of the Coal-Measures differ greatly in neigh-
bouring sinkings without any surface indications of faults. These
anomalies, due to unseen or observed dislocations, show that in the interval
between Carboniferous and Permian times the Coal-Measures were much
broken up. Such faults are occasionally found, as at Cinderhill, to
affect in a less degree the overlying strata, in which case the disturbance
was repeated, but on a smaller scale. Other faults, like those parallel to
the Trent valley, seem to have first occurred in post-Triassic times.
THE PERMIAN SYSTEM
The Permian rocks of Nottinghamshire form part of the typical
series in England, being continued through Yorkshire into Durham.
The fullest development is in the north of this area ; and on going
south the divisions one by one die out till the last of them disappears
near Wollaton. Everywhere it is a most peculiar formation. Litho-
logically it is characterized by the occurrence of a magnesian limestone
or dolomite, and by the red and mottled colour of its clays. Palas-
ontologically it contains the last relics of the Palasozoic genera, such
as Productus, associated with forerunners of Mesozoic types, such as
Schizodus. Various rocks have been called Permian in other parts of
England, including some, as the Rotherham Red Rock, now known
to belong to the Coal-Measures, but only some in Lancashire and
Cheshire contain any of the characteristic fossils, and there, as a whole,
they are of a different lithological character.
The unconformity of the Permian to the Coal-Measures is already
shown by its resting upon different parts of them in different sinkings
and by its being unaffected in whole or in part by many of the faults
in that series. The actual junction, demonstrating on a small scale all
these features, may be seen in the Great Northern (Erewash Valley
Branch) Railway between Hempshill and Kimberley, where it has been
described by Mr. Wilson.1 The unconformity in this district was first
recognized in the original description of the series given by Professor
Sedgwick.2
THE BASEMENT BEDS. — The natural basement conglomerate along
1 <%uart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxii.
* Trans. Geol. Soc. ser. 2, vol. iii.
13
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
the shore line of a new set of deposits is represented in the southern
part of the county by a breccia, first noticed by Professor Sedgwick in
the mineral railway at Grives Wood between Kirkby and Sutton-in-
Ashfield, where it crops out at the base of the slope at its southern end.
The same breccia is well seen in a ravine near Annesley Park springs
and in the railway cuttings of the Midland and Great Northern Railways
at Kimberley ; but its constancy is best proved in borings which pierce
the Permian, where it is commonly observed, when the records are care-
fully kept, and in the case of South Scarle it was the means by which the
true reading of the section was recognized by Mr. Wilson. Its last
appearance southward is seen at Old Park farm near Wollaton Colliery.
It varies from a compact grey sandstone to a coarsely brecciated con-
glomerate, seldom more than 3 feet in thickness, but rising to a maximum
of i 2 feet in a boring near Mansfield and reducing to I foot or less in
the Gedling, Thurgarton and South Scarle borings. ' It contains much
angular Coal-Measure debris, sandstone, ironstone and ochreous shale,
also rounded pebbles of white quartz and angular fragments of slate,
chert and limestone' (Wilson).1 In the northern part of the county no
breccia has been observed in the borings either at Shireoaks or Southcar.
At the former a bed of sandstone has been referred to the base of the
Permian, but as it lies below 33 feet of blue bind it is possibly part
of the Carboniferous series. These localities may be too far removed
from the shore line of the period for the formation of a breccia.
Above the breccia comes a series of thin-bedded rocks, alternating
more or less frequently with shales. These shales much resemble Coal-
Measures and contain many Carbonaceous remains ; they gradually become
harder, and end upwards as bands of compact red limestone, varying in
character with the overlying massive Magnesian Limestone. Geodes of
calcite and pyrites are recorded from them. At the southernmost point
near Wollaton there are only 3 or 4 feet of yellow and red marly beds
between the breccia and the Magnesian Limestone, but this increases to
20 feet of shales in the Kimberley railway cuttings,2 where numerous
fine layers of sandstone form part of it. Many of these show remains
of plants, and some show casts of Pleurophorus and Schizodus. They
may be seen again in this neighbourhood on the rise to Chalk Hill,
west of Kimberley. In the road from Hucknall Torkard to the Long
Hills a slight fault crossing the road has raised the underlying shales and
compact beds so as to be cut off along the roadside bank by the Magnesian
Limestone, whose water they throw out, but the thickness is not here
determinable. The succession may also be well seen in the slopes and in
the stream bottom of a ravine, running west from Annesley Park springs.
The upper part is composed of the Magnesian Limestone, here deposit-
ing calcareous tufa from its waters ; the slopes and part of the stream bed
show about 20 feet of shales, and beds of limestone and the breccia may
be seen crossing the stream at the base. At the Grives Wood cutting
1 Midland Naturalist, vol. iv.
3 Wilson, Quart. Journ. Geol. Sac. vol. xxxii.
14
GEOLOGY
they are thus described by Mr. Aveline : ' The shales have a thickness
of about 15 feet; they are of a blue and light brown colour, have a
marly character and are interstratified with bands of hard compact lime-
stone, full of fossils.' Of these he records Scbizodus scblotbeimi, S. truncates
and Pleurophorus costatus, and plant remains in some of the harder bands.1
In the memoir on the sheet to the north, 82 S.E., are described
two sections of about 20 feet, seen in road-cuttings over the edge of
the Magnesian Limestone escarpment near Skegby and on Fulwood
Top. Here the limestone passes down into beds of soft sandstone of a
brown colour, interstratified with which are more or fewer bands of
hard compact fossiliferous limestone. These contain the same organic
remains as those named above, except that Bakewellia ceratophaga takes
the place of Scbizodus scblotheimi. In colliery sinkings this portion of
the series cannot easily be recognized except by finding the breccia below
and the Magnesian Limestone above. Between these limits at Linby Col-
liery there are alternations of blue bind and various bands of limestone,
28^ feet in all; at Shireoaks the record of ' limestone bands and bands of
blue metal, 19—20 feet,' represents the same beds. At South Scarle there
are 138 feet in the same interval, and at Southcar as much as 185 feet
between the lowest massive limestone and the Coal-Measures. The
following records of these last two borings through post-Carboniferous
strata are given for reference : —
SECTION OF BORING AT SOUTH SCARLE 2 SECTION OF BORING AT SOUTHCAR ON THE IDLE3
ft. ft.
River Gravel 21 Alluvium 32
Lias 29 Upper Keuper '05^
Rhaetic 15 Lower Keuper [533] .... ~| z oj_
Keuper Marls 688 [Upper Red Sandstone, 75^] . . j
Keuper Sandstones 2o8£ Hunter Pebble Beds [273^] • • \ i
Bunter Pebble Beds 318^ [Lower Red Sandstone, 161] . . J4
Lower Red Sandstone . . . . 223 Upper Permian Marls with 9 ft.
Upper Permian Marls . . . . 1 1 8^ seam of Anhydrite and some
Upper Limestone 43^ Gypsum 89
Middle Permian Marls . . . . 150 Upper Limestone 53
Magnesian Limestone .... 68 Middle Permian Marls with Gyp-
Sandstone 20 sum veins [148] 132
Marl Slate 118 Magnesian Limestone [56] . . 273
Breccia i [Grey Limestone and Shales, 201]
2,022 1,727^
Coal-Measures, see p. 7. Coal-Measures, see p. 8.
The term Marl Slate here used is the name of a group occupying a
similar position in Durham. The characters of the groups are scarcely
identical, the latter being a fissile rock with many fish-skeletons in the
intervals of the laminae, and not containing the shells found in the
former near Nottingham. It will be seen that the group has greatly
thickened towards the east.
1 Geol, Survey Mem. sheet 71, N.E.
1 Dalton, Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 83. This account differs from those given by all earlier writers.
3 Dunstan, Midi. Inst. Mm. Civ. and Mecb. Eng. Trans, vol. xiv. Extra details in square brackets.
15
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
THE MAGNESIAN LIMESTONE is the most important, widespread and
characteristic of the Permian deposits. In the form most commonly
seen near Nottingham, where it is largely used as a building stone, it
consists of a number of rhombohedral crystals of dolomite with inter-
vening hollow spaces. It is of a peculiar brownish yellow colour, due
to oxide of iron. It yields about half its weight of magnesium sulphate
(Epsom salts), but it has not hitherto been used commercially as is done
near Sutherland. * Sulphate of baryta is a very abundant mineral in many
parts of the formation ' in crystalline nodules and veins in the freestone
beds of Mansfield and at Pleasley (Sedgwick). The limestone is every-
where water bearing and supplies many wells, as in the Leen valley, but
the water is naturally hard, as is shown by the tufa near Annesley Park
springs already referred to. It may occur in fairly massive beds, 8— 10
inches thick, in which case it is used for building, or in large flaggy beds
with irregular rough surfaces and greenish marl interstices.
The crystalline structure is not original, but has been produced by
later alterations, for it is accompanied by the breaking up of the surface
of any individual stratum and the formation of curvilinear cracks in the
mass, as seen in Grives Wood quarries. It is possible that this crystal-
lization has destroyed some of the organic remains, but more probably
they were never abundant, since when they are found they occur mostly
as hollow casts in definite layers, differing in no other respect from the
neighbouring barren ones. Such fossiliferous layers, with casts of Schi-
zodus and Bakeivellia, are seen in the limestone quarries at Bulwell, in the
old quarries at Beauvale near Greasley, in Grives Wood, whence Scbizodus
obscurus and plates of Chiton have been recorded ' ; and in a quarry near
Shireoaks, which has yielded fine examples of Productus borridus? found
also in the Thurgarton boring.3
In the southern part of the county the maximum thickness is only 30
feet, yet the limestone extends over a considerable area in the Leen valley.
This is due to the fact that the dip is very low, 2°-3° to the east, and
the overlying clay is very easily removed by denudation. There is, how-
ever, a very curious anticlinal in which the overlying rocks concur near
Middle Mill, east of Hucknall Torkard. It is exposed in a small quarry,
of which it occupies the entire end, but there is no surface indication of
its existence in the flat marshy field composed of the overlying marls.
Two other similar small anticlinals have been noted in the neighbourhood
(Shipman).
The most south-westerly point at which the Magnesian Limestone
has been observed is near Bobbers' Mill, Radford, where it is a coarse
brecciated rock followed by a grit (Wilson). At Strelley it is sandy. It
probably never extended much more westerly than its present boundary,
as no outlier is known more than 1 1 miles from its escarpment. Nearly
as far north as Mansfield it remains fairly constant in thickness and
character, but at New Mill, a mile south of that town, it is found to
1 King, Permian Fossils (Pal. Soc.) * Tylden Wright in White's Worksop.
8 ' Summary of Progress for 1899.'
16
GEOLOGY
swell out suddenly and to change its nature. It takes on the form of a
white calcareous sandstone, 60 feet in thickness. The lower parts are
more siliceous and the higher more calcareous, and the whole is massive
and irregularly bedded. A mile to the north-east of the town, in the
Rock valley, a similar rock of equal thickness, but of a red colour,
is quarried. The following analyses of the two varieties have been
published r1 —
MANSFIELD WHITE SANDSTONE MANSFIELD RED SANDSTONE
Silica 5!'4O Silica 49'4
Carbonate of lime 26*50 Carbonate of lime 26-5
Carbonate of magnesia . . . . ij'<)8 Carbonate of magnesia .... i6'i
Iron, alumina, etc 1*32 Iron, alumina, etc 3-2
Water and loss 2'8o Water and loss 4-8
lOO'OO lOO'OO
This sandstone may be traced by quarries running in a N.N.E.
direction across the country to Pleasley Vale, between Pleasley Forge and
Pleasley Works, and so out of the county. As the dip of the strata
generally is eastwards, it is probable that the bulk of the limestone lying
to the east of the outcrop of the sandstone is higher in the series than
that to the west. Thus the Magnesian Limestone as a whole may be
divisible into two parts, the sandstone forming the base of the higher.
The upper Magnesian Limestone is seen to overlie the sandstone at the
quarries, and at a higher level it expands to a rock of beautiful character
at Mansfield Woodhouse. In the quarries there worked it is a glistening,
finely crystalline limestone of yellowish white colour, with scattered black
specks, and having the composition : —
Carbonate of lime 5I-65
Carbonate of magnesia 42'6o
Silica 3'7°
Water and loss 2*05
lOO'OO
From this quarry in a direction parallel to the strike of the sandstone of
Mansfield the Bolsover Moor Quarry is reached, both quarries yielding
similar stone of celebrated building properties.2 This same type of lime-
stone occupies the surface for the rest of the range in the county, and
near Warsop becomes very finely laminated and perforated with numer-
ous fine holes, whence some extra-soluble crystalline ingredient has been
dissolved out. At Streetly near Worksop the limestone is also ' white
and crystalline.'
It will be noted in a geological map that to the south of Mansfield
the surface occupied by the Magnesian Limestone is about 1 1— 2 miles
broad, but to the north of that town it is 6 miles broad. This is partly
due to the thickening of the lower beds, but also to the coming on of a
1 Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 82, S.E.
* See ' Parliamentary Report on Building Stones, 1839.'
I J7 3
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
new deposit. That there are two distinct masses is shown by the section
at Shireoaks containing a lower band of 48 feet and an upper band of
40 feet separately recorded.1 In south Yorkshire these two beds are not
only recognized but named ; the lower being 1 20 feet thick and the
upper one, named the ' small-grained dolomite,' 200 feet.2 It is to the
latter of these — the small-grained dolomite — that the limestone north of
Mansfield belongs. It is possible also that to the same portion belongs
the main Magnesian Limestone in the borings to the east of the county,
the lower portion having more or less degenerated into shales and thin
beds and so being included in the abnormally thick basement beds. In
one boring there is a ' sandstone 20 ft.' in a position which would then
correspond to that of the Mansfield freestone.
THE MARLS AND SANDSTONES. — Overlying the Magnesian Limestone
is found a series of beds consisting of so-called marls (though not calcareous)
and sandstones alternating. The latter are chiefly found near the base of
the series or in the north of the county. The marls are a brilliant red
with bands of bluish white. The sandstones are reddish purple, sharp
grained and sometimes calcareous. In most places these have every sign
of conformity to the rocks on which they lie ; nevertheless they must in
the course of their range overlap the upper part of the limestone to lie
on the lower. In some places, as near Mansfield, it has been thought
that unconformity may be seen by the undulating surface on which the
marls rest.3 A still more remarkable case is the apparent anticlinal of
the limestone overlaid by horizontal marls in a cutting of the Lancashire,
Derbyshire and East Coast Railway at Warsop Colliery junction, figured
by Mr. C. Fox-Strangways,4 but this, like the others, may perhaps be
explained by an original inequality of the surface and the formation of
concentric cracks by subsequent concretionary action.
The marls do not give rise to any features, but form the base of
flat areas, as in the Leen valley. They nevertheless play an important
part in relation to other beds. As an impervious stratum of sufficient
thickness not to be easily broken through they hold up the water that
falls on the overlying porous Bunter sands, and render possible the exist-
ence of lakes, as at Newstead and Welbeck, and to some extent also the
higher ones at Thoresby and Clumber. On the other hand their softness
and comparative thinness has caused them to be removed from over a
large surface of the Magnesian Limestone, and gives that more valuable
stratum a larger superficial area than its thickness would suggest.
At the Cinderhill brickworks, in the south of the range of this
series, the Magnesian Limestone is seen at the base, followed immedi-
ately by the highly contrasting brilliant red clay, in which there are
thin beds of sandstone, having their surface covered with curious
markings which may be due to annelids. The total thickness here
1 Lancaster and Wright, loc. cit.
2 Kirkby, Quart. Journ. Geol. Sac. vol. xvii.
3 Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 82, S.E.
4 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. liv. p. 161, fig. I. Compare fig. z.
18
GEOLOGY
seen is 25-30 feet up to the base of the Triassic sandstone. From this
spot it may be traced with the same character to the west side of
Bulwell and Hucknall Torkard, by the lake at Newstead and on the
other side of the Triassic ridge to the brickyard near Kirkby station.
Further on it forms the flanks of a hill between Mansfield and Skegby.
After an interval, north of Mansfield where the Trias overlaps and
conceals it, a new development commences beyond Cuckney, where a
broad expanse of it occupies the surface which culminates at Woodhouse
Hill. Here is seen in a lane-section 30-40 feet of red sandstone in thick
beds alternating with clay near the centre. On this rising ground there
is a valley in which the Magnesian Limestone has been quarried beneath
these red sandstones ; over these come clays and over these again
comes a higher limestone occupying the higher ground (Aveline). Thus
the clays and sandstones are here included between two limestones. A
little further north the red sandstone gives the names to Ratcliff and
Red Hill. It much resembles the Trias sandstone, but it passes as
before beneath the marls and limestone. In the Shireoaks sinking
thirteen alternations of sand and clay in 46 feet were passed through
between two limestones, but on the east of the county 133 feet with
gypsum are recorded at Southcar and 150 feet at South Scarle in the
same relative position.
THE UPPER LIMESTONES. — These have been already noticed as cap-
ping the marls in places, and in the extreme north they come on in
force and form an essential feature in the south Yorkshire type of
Permian. The series consists of i 20 feet of thin-bedded limestones of a
quite different character from that of the Magnesian Limestone. They
were called ' Brotherton Beds ' by Professor Sedgwick. They are
described by Mr. Kirkby1 as ' usually hard and compact and of a yellow
or grey colour ; the surface planes are generally a little apart and often
coated with red, green, or purple clays.' They contain very little mag-
nesia, so that the term magnesian should be restricted to the lower lime-
stones. They are much jointed and have the joint faces covered with
dendritic markings. They are first seen in force just north of Shireoaks,
round Ramoth-Gilead, and continue to the many quarries round Carlton
and Oldcoates, where fossils abound. Those recorded are Myalina baus-
manni (M. squamosus, Sow.), Schizodus truncatus and S. schlotheimi.
The Upper Limestone is found again in the deep borings in the
east of the county, that at Southcar showing 53 feet of grey limestone in
one mass between two series of marls and that at South Scarle showing
43! feet in the same position. It does not appear therefore to be thick-
ening in this direction.
THE UPPER MARLS. — In certain places in the north of the county,
viz. on Whincommon, north-east of Oldcoates and near Carlton, the
Geological Survey3 record the occurrence of red and variegated marls,
without intermixed sandstone, above the Upper Limestones. These are
1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Sue. vol. xvii.
8 Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 82, N.E.
19
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
the commencement of a larger group which occurs in south Yorkshire,
and forms the highest member of the Permian anywhere seen. The
Upper Marls have been called, in reference to their supposed equivalents
in Germany, the Banter Schiefer. There can be no question however
that all these red marls belong to one, i.e. Permian, group, for the base of
the Trias transgresses from one to the other.
These Marls are thicker in the eastern borings, for whereas at their
outcrop (in south Yorkshire) there are only 50 feet of them, at Southcar
and South Scarle respectively there are 89 feet and ii8| feet. In the
former place they contain a remarkable 9 feet bed of anhydrite, and also
some gypsum, which is found also in the Lower Marls there and in the
Upper Marls at Oldcoates.
THE TRIASSIC SYSTEM
Although this system retains the name of Trias applied to it in
Germany as consisting of three parts, there are in England two only,
which after their German equivalents are called the Bunter and the Keufer,
the central member, or Muschelkalk, being the absent member. These
two formations together occupy the greater part of the whole county —
the strata already dealt with forming merely the western fringe, as the
Jurassic form the eastern and southern fringe of it.
The Trias on a large scale lies unconformably on the Permian. At
any single point it may seem to be conformable, but it passes indifferently
over all the members in turn from the Upper Marls to the Magnesian
Limestone, and passes beyond the limits of all to lie directly upon the
Coal-Measures. And this is not due to a simple overlap by a later
stratum. The Trias could not have been deposited where it is now found
unless the lower strata has been irregularly denuded, so as to leave outliers
in one spot and not in another with the Trias lying equally over all.
THE BUNTER SERIES consists almost entirely of sandstones, which in
parts are plentifully supplied with pebbles, as is so commonly the case
with the basal beds of a new series — though here through a greater thick-
ness than usual. The principal deposit of pebbles occurs in the middle
portion, from which circumstance this part is called the Pebble Beds,
while the portion below is called the Lower Red and Mottled Sandstone
and that above, when it occurs, the Upper Red and Mottled Sandstone.
For the greater part of its range the Bunter sandstones rest upon
various members of the Permian strata, and are raised up with them to a
considerable height. Its base at Bobbers Mill is 107 feet above O.D.
At Hempshill the base has risen to 270 feet, while at Bulwell Spring to
the east it has descended to 175 feet, and at the colliery to 126 feet, these
last three showing the easterly dip. At the upper end of the Leen
valley the base appears to be at about 430 feet. At Mansfield it attains
its maximum elevation in a hill of 588 feet, which includes drift gravels,
so that its base is probably less than 500 feet above O.D. From this
point it descends at Warsop to 210 feet, at Cuckney to 180 feet, here
20
GEOLOGY
overlapping the eroded Permian. Traced to the east by borings the
base descends at Gedling to 250. feet below O.D., at Thurgarton to
656 feet, at South Scarle to 1,503 feet, these being along a north-east
line ; at East Retford to 730 feet and at Southcar to 1,165 ^eet-
In all the above cases the Bunter rests on the Permian, but in the
south it passes beyond this limit and rests on various parts of the Coal-
Measures. It is here carried down to a lower level partly by erosion of
its support and partly by faulting. At the Radford gasworks the basal
breccia was found at about 60 feet above O.D. From this point it
gradually rises westward to 220 feet in Broomhill Plantation and to 320
feet at Catstone Hill outlier. Farther south it is affected by the first east
and west fault, and is found at Clifton Colliery 74 feet below O.D., at
Highfield Park 167 feet below O.D. — a difference due in part to a greater
erosion of the underlying coal strata to the west. The base of the
Bunter is not seen again in the county, but at a boring for water at
Wilsthorpe, just on the Derbyshire side of the Erewash, the top of the
whole Bunter is 153 feet below O.D.1 ; how much lower the base may be
is not known. South of another fault the base of the Bunter is found to
be 367 feet below O.D. in the Chilwell boring, 377 feet at Clifton, 579
feet at Ruddington, 602 feet at Edwalton and 888 feet at Owthorpe —
all below O.D. Those figures show a slope to the east at a lower
level but of a slower rate than between Gedling and Thurgarton — but
owing to there being known post-Triassic faults in the district, e.g. one of
275 feet throw at Clifton Colliery, it is impossible to be certain of any
interpretation of this. Nevertheless it suggests that a pre-Triassic valley
of erosion may be the cause.
The Lower Red Sandstone usually contains no pebbles and the grains
of sand are finer than in the Pebble Beds. They are coated with a film
of red hsmatitic colouring matter which may be removed by hydrochloric
acid, leaving them white. This bleaching action — by other acids — takes
place sporadically in nature, and gives a mottled appearance to the rock.
There is in many cases much falsebedding. Although the body of the
rock does not usually contain pebbles there is found at or near the base in
several localities a bed of breccia or conglomerate. Such a breccia, 5 to
8 feet thick, occurred in the excavations for the gas works at Old
Radford.2 In the brickyard south of the railway at Cinderhill this has
long been noticed, and at one time was thought to represent the line of
separation between Trias and Permian. In the Hempshill railway cutting
described by Mr. Wilson3 this semi-basal breccia ' is alternately sandy,
marly and calcareous and it contains semi-angular green, blue and purple
slates, more or less rounded grits, quartzites, and numerous white and
discoloured slabs and nodular balls of fossiliferous Carboniferous Lime-
stone Chert.' It is plain that new sources of material were available for
its production. Similar pebbly bands have been met with at Annesley
1 Shipman, 'Geol. of Sandiacre,' Trans. Nott. Nat. Sue. for 1891 (interpretation modified).
8 Shipman, Trans. Nott. Nat. Sac. for 1889.
8 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxxii.
21
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
and elsewhere as well as in borings at Bestwood, Clifton Colliery and
Highfield ; on the other hand bands of clay occur in the midst of the
sandstone east of Kimberley and at Bulwell spring. No fossils either
original or derived have ever been recorded from this deposit, but a
ripple-marked slab was found by Mr. Shipman at Old Radford.
The thickness of this division is variable and uncertain. At Bobbers
Mill it cannot be more than 20—30 feet, but on the southern slopes of the
Long Hills it must be greater and in the Robin Hood's Hills about 70
feet is seen, capped by Pebble Beds. At Mansfield and Worksop and to
the east of Kimberley it is so fine in grain as to be used for moulding
sand. In the northern part of its range it is thin and finally disappears
beyond Blyth.
The Pebble Beds. — No definite line can be drawn between these and
the last group, unless a bed of pebbles comes on suddenly. On the whole
the sand grains are coarser and of a yellow colour, and the pebbles are of
various sizes and kinds and are not always or usually in contact.
Lenticular bands more pebbly than the rest, and in like manner some
layers of red clay, lie irregularly in the mass. The false bedding when
present indicates currents principally from the west or north-west, though
other and sometimes opposite directions are represented. There is no
continuous real bedding. The coating of the component sand-grains
keeps them together against any natural tendency to separate. The
exposed surfaces do not generally exfoliate under the severest frosts and
the tool marks on cut surfaces are not easily effaced. Yet the rock is
easily cut and does not fall from a roof even of large size.
For this reason the rock is often cut into chambers, caves and passages
with which the city of Nottingham abounds, of which Mortimer's Hole in
the Castle Rock is one. The ' Hermitage ' at Sneinton consists of numerous
dwellings dug in the rock. In the cliff overlooking the Leen by the side
of Lenton Boulevard are numerous recesses cut in an excavated chamber,
hence called the Columbarium, though more probably once used as a
shop. A very large excavation was made in the eighteenth century in
the rock on the Mansfield Road for extracting sand for sale.1 Most of
the cellars in the centre of the city are rock cellars, and passages are often
discovered in making excavations, as in the case of the reservoir at the top
of Standard Hill. Probably the whole city is more or less excavated like
a piece of bored wood. Carvings are also cut to represent wild animals
on the edge of the rock along the Rope Walk. The catacombs in the
church cemetery are modern excavations.
At Nottingham the outcrop of the Pebble Beds is limited to a
breadth of i \—^\: miles owing to the coming on of the Keuper Series on
the high ground to the east, and the total thickness is estimated at 200
feet, but further north the outcrop widens out to a breadth of 7-9 miles,
the Keuper being worn back to lower levels on the east. This is probably
due to the greater elevation to which the Pebble Beds have been raised.
1 Shipman, Brit. Assoc. Handbook, 1893.
22
GEOLOGY
If we allow 30 feet for the unknown thickness of drift with which they
are covered, the solid rock rises to 538 feet near Annesley, 595 feet on
the Robin Hood's Hills (their highest point) and 558 feet west of Mans-
field. From these elevations they gradually slope to north and south but
more especially towards the east, exposing a broad dip slope. This, worn
into irregular hills and possibly undulating also, forms the wild sandy
forest land for which Nottinghamshire is famous.
It is this large catchment area of more than 120 square miles,
together with the porosity of the rock, which makes the Pebble Beds and
underlying Red Sandstones so valuable for water supply. The larger
part of the rainfall sinks in at once and has a free passage, so that there
are but few streams on the surface, which is but sparsely inhabited, and
little injury to agriculture can result from the extraction of water. The
lower parts are thus saturated by available water and afford an almost
inexhaustible supply. At the same time the reservoir itself forms its
own admirable filter bed, and the water comes out with only the mineral
impurities dissolved in its passage through the rock, which are not on
the average great. The amount extracted in 1893 amounted to more
than 5,000,000 gallons daily for the use of the borough of Nottingham,1
while at the boring at South Scarle the water rose in a fountain above
the surface from a depth of 960— 1,440 feet.
The origin of the Pebbles in the Bunter. — This is a subject which has
been much discussed, but it cannot be said that any satisfactory solution
has been arrived at. A similar question might be asked concerning the
materials of any stratum, e.g. the Millstone Grit, and it would be equally
hard to answer. In the present case, however, hopes of a solution are
raised by the size of the pebbles, which are large enough to show any
special characters of the rock whence they are derived, whether litho-
logical or palasontological. With regard to the lithological characters
the bulk of the pebbles are of quartzite, many of which are of a peculiar
liver-coloured tint, and others are whiter or of vein quartz. These as a
rule afford very little guide, as ' one quartzite is very like another.'
The rarer pebbles are of ' green and black slates, jaspers, gneiss, sub-
angular blocks of sandstone, rounded greenstone and felstone ' (Irving),
Millstone Grit, Yoredale Sandstone, Caradoc Sandstone, amygdaloidal
lava, chert, white granite, volcanic ash, and toadstone (Shipman).
Palaeontologically they have been found to contain Ortbis budleighensis,
0. Jiabellulum, O. calligramma, Atrypa cf. reticularis, Stropbomena grandis
and Glyptocrinus basalts from pre-Carboniferous rocks and Lonsdaleia Jiori-
formis from the Carboniferous Limestone.
Neither these rocks nor these fossils could have come from the
north down the east side of the Pennine axis from any rocks now
exposed in situ, for there are none such containing them. They probably
came from the west, as indicated by the prevailing falsebedding, or in
part from the north-west. The exact locality of the land of their origin
1 Hull, Report Brit. Asm. 1895, p. 743.
23
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
it is not so easy to name. Two suggestions have been brought forward :
(i) that they were brought by a large river from the Highlands ; ' (2) that
they are derived from some of the old rocks which border the Pebble
Beds as a whole on the west or which are hidden by newer strata.8
To the former suggestion there are apparently the following objec-
tions : (i) the fossils in the pebbles do not at all indicate the direction
suggested ; (2) there are no signs of any such river till the Midlands
are reached; (3) it is contrary to the laws of river deposits that the
finer sediments should be deposited nearer the source ; (4) it is impossible
to account for the Pebble Beds extending up the east side of the Pennine
axis. The only positive argument brought forward in its favour is the
remarkable similarity in some respects of some of the pebbles to some
part of the Torridon sandstones and quartzites of the north-west High-
lands, and to some of the igneous rocks in south Scotland. The latter
suggestion has everything in its favour except the very serious difficulty
that so far as the known rocks are concerned an adequate source of sup-
ply for the pebbles cannot yet be named, and the existence of such under
cover of newer rocks is purely hypothetical. It is possible that this
difficulty may be removed by further researches.
With regard to the means of transport it should be noted that the
Bunter is an exceptional deposit, yet it is extremely widespread ; some-
thing of the same kind being found in Germany, the south of England,
the north of Scotland and America ; all belong to a period during which
old forms of life, in the regions where it occurs, were changing into new.
Perhaps we ought not to look to the action of an ordinary river or of the
sea in its ordinary condition as the efficient cause of transport.
The Upper Red Sandstone. — In the neighbourhood of Nottingham
itself there are no beds that have been assigned to this division. But
towards the east of the county the borings record massive beds of red
sandstone, in which no pebbles are noted, overlying characteristic repre-
sentatives of the Pebble Beds. At East Retford 123 feet of such occur,
and some is even exposed there at the surface according to Mr. Metcalfe.3
In the boring at Scarle 206 feet of the strata have been definitely referred
to this group by Mr. De Ranee,4 and at Southcar 75 feet of red sandstone
occur immediately above the beds with pebbles. In both these cases the
inclusion of the red sandstone with the Pebble Beds would make the
latter abnormally thick.
The '•Hemlock Stone' — This remarkable outstanding rock and its
neighbours the Bramcote and Stapleford Hills have given rise to much
discussion as to the age of the rocks composing them. Their prominence,
and in the case of the ' stone ' the shape is primarily due to the infiltra-
tion of the sand by an ordinarily insoluble substance — barium sulphate.8
This has been irregularly distributed, and where it has been wanting the
1 T. G. Bonney, Geol. Mag. 1880 ; Brit. Assoc. 1886 ; Quart. Journ. Geol. SK. vol. Ivi.
8 W. J. Harrison, Proc. Birm. Phil. Sue. vol. iii. 1882.
8 ' Geology of Nottinghamshire ' in White's Nottinghamshire, 1 894.
* Rep. Brit. Assoc. 1891. 5 Clowes, Brit. Aaoc. 1885 ; Proc. Roy Soc. 1889.
24
GEOLOGY
rock has weathered away leaving the hardened parts outstanding. The
top of Bramcote Hill is filled with porphyritic white crystals of baryta
enclosing the sand grains in its substance, and these weather out into
pebble-like lumps, but there is no special conglomerate — only the
ordinary pebbles found in other parts of the hill. The cap of the
Hemlock Stone is impregnated, but the base is less so, if at all. The
top is aiso pebbly and the lower part soft and false-bedded without
pebbles. For these reasons the upper part more easily resists the weather
and therefore overhangs. In the neighbouring Stapleford Hill the lower
part is in places fully charged with baryta crystals side by side with
parts which are uncharged and soft ; at the same time the pebbly and
non-pebbly parts are here found somewhat alternating. At the bottom
of Bramcote village the sandstone has a peculiar mammillated structure, as
though the grains were agglutinated by an infiltered mineral. Now the
presence of baryta and its results in this case were first made known in
1885, but in 1882 Mr. Strahan, in his Survey Memoir, 'On the country
round Chester,' had already described rocks on the summit of Beeston
Castle with abundance of baryta, showing also the porphyritic crystals,
the massive form with glistening faces, and the mammillated, agglutinated
sandstone, just as if he had been describing Bramcote and Stapleford
Hills. They are also false bedded and red in parts, and in parts pebbly
and yellow. Lithologically, therefore, and chemically the two sets of
deposit agree. There remains only the question of position. At Beeston
Castle these beds overlie the Upper Red Sandstone ; at Stapleford Hill
they reach a height of 33 i feet above O.D., and at Bramcote Hill of over
300 feet, while a section of ordinary Pebble Beds is seen in Moor Lane,
only 460 yards distant from the latter, at a little over 200 feet. They are
therefore more likely to represent the Upper Red Sandstone and higher
beds than the Lower Red Sandstone and Pebble Beds ; especially as the
junction of the two latter is seen at Catstone Hill, if miles to the north
on the other side of an upthrow fault of large amount at nearly the same
level, but differing in the character of both components.
There is every reason, therefore, to believe that the rocks of the
Hemlock Stone and neighbouring hills are the equivalents in a diminished
form of those that overlie the Pebble Beds at Beeston Castle, especially
as similar phenomena are observable in the interval. These have been
divided in Cheshire l into two parts : a lower, softer part, called the
Upper Red Sandstone, and an upper, harder part, called Keuper Basement
Beds. It appears, however, that the only grounds for placing the
upper division in the Keuper are an apparent gradual passage upwards
into the Waterstones, and an apparent unconformity with the lower
division, below a well marked conglomerate — both of which grounds
are contested by Mr. Strahan and which are certainly not applicable at
Bramcote and Stapleford Hills. Here at all events no beds have any re-
lation to the Keuper, but all are the topmost beds of the Bunter whether
1 Strahan, loc. cit. See also Hull, 'Triassic and Permian Rocks,' Geol. Surv. Mem. p. 9, and Strahan,
Geol. Mag. 1881, p. 401.
I 25 4
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
separable or not. It would thus appear that in the type of Bunter which
prevails to the west the beds of pebbles are not entirely confined to the
centre.
It has been suggested that certain sandstones discovered at the top of
the Pebble Beds in the east of Nottingham represent those at the Hemlock
Stone called ' Keuper Basement Beds,' but much confusion has arisen as
to the relative position of these and the Keuper Conglomerate (see post),
and the exposures referred to being now covered it is impossible to clear
the matter up.
The thickness of the whole Bunter series cannot easily be deter-
mined in the west, and can only be estimated where the beds outcrop,
but in the east where covered by Keuper Beds we find the whole thick-
ness at Ruddington to be 218 feet, at Owthorpe 428 feet, at Gedling
366 feet, at Thurgarton 343 feet, and in parts where the Upper Red
Sandstones are left, as at East Retford, 616 feet, at South Scarle 542 feet
and at Southcar 434 feet. These figures however depend too much on
the interpretation of cores to be thoroughly reliable.
THE KEUPER SERIES. — The Keuper Beds throughout are sharply
contrasted with the Bunter. Instead of the coarse torrential deposits
with pebbles and falsebedding we find thin hard beds of constant thick-
ness and very fine grain separated by beds of clay of various shades of red.
The proportion of the hard beds to the clay varies. Towards the base
the hard beds abound, towards the top the clay ; and though there
is no sharp line of junction between them the former are called Keuper
Sandstones or Waterstones, and the latter Keuper Marls.
The Keuper Sandstones or Waterstones. — This last name appears to
have been given in the Midlands from their water-bearing property when
pierced through the overlying marls ' (though there is another account
of its origin),2 and it is somewhat justified by the fountain of water
obtained from them in the South Scarle boring. Yet it appears a strange
title when used in the neighbourhood of the far superior Bunter Beds.
The base in many places consists of a hard calcareous conglomerate, with
sub-angular pebbles usually in greater variety than in the adjacent Pebble
Beds. The existence of this conglomerate in relation to the Keuper
Sandstones was first pointed out by Dr. Irving 3 in Red Lane and on the
hillside east of Sneinton — as well as in the excavations for various
culverts in the east of Nottingham. It has also been traced (by Messrs.
Wilson and Shipman) at Red Hill three miles north of the city, at
Highfield House near the lake, at the south-west corner of Wollaton
Park and on the top of the hill at Bramcote village. It was formerly
easy to see it, whilst houses were being built over the line of junction in
the east of the city. Further north and east in the county it has not
been seen, possibly from want of suitable sections, except at Retford
where nine inches of it are recorded by Mr. Metcalfe in a well-boring.
1 Hull, Triassic and Permian Rocks.
2 See Woodward, Geology of England and Wales.
3 Geol. Mag. 1874, 'The Geology of the Nottingham District.'
26
GEOLOGY
Perhaps the most instructive of these localities is that at the south-
west corner of Wollaton Park. Here the pebbles are large, various,
close together and with a strong calcareous cement, the rock in every
respect differing from any near the Hemlock Stone only if miles away, and
resting on a lower part of the Bunter Series seen in the sand pit below.
Elsewhere also it rests on various parts of the Bunter, showing the un-
conformity between the two series, but it is nowhere known to reach
the Lower Red Sandstone.
Overlying the conglomerate are other beds, which differ from the
normal Waterstones, as may be seen in the following section.
Section of the junction between Keuper and Bunter in an excavation for drainage at the junction
of Sneinton Dale and the Hollows. Communicated by IV. N. Blair, 1884.
Shaly beds of red marl, 6 ft. 6 in.
ft. in.
Shaly beds of bluish grey marl, sandy towards the bottom ... 2 8
Yellowish grey sandstone, with yellow spots and a few pebbles . o 10
Conglomerate of yellow sandy matrix with pebbles of various
material, becoming more calcareous towards the base . • . 3 9
Very hard conglomerate, with red matrix full of pebbles ...06
Sandstone rock (Bunter) with a few scattered pebbles 40 ft. +
These basal beds are not separated by any marked line from the rest
of the Keuper Sandstones, though differing from them in character. We
find the yellow spotted sandstone in many walls near the junction line.
The bluish grey marl is found in a similar position at Farnsfield, Ollerton,
Retford and Everton (at the extreme north of the county).1
The alternations of dark red marls with thin sandstones or fine
marly limestone, which constitute the lower part of the Keuper Sand-
stones, may be very well seen at the Carlton Hill brickyard. They are
similar to those described above the conglomerate at Blue Bell Hill and
Rough Hill Wood excavations by Dr. Irving 2 and Messrs. Wilson and
Shipman.3 The limestones have flat surfaces and the sandstones are often
ripple-marked. The latter often contain on their undersurfaces pseudo-
morphs in sand after hopper-shaped crystals of salt. Such have been
noticed also at Colwick and Blue Bell Hill as well as in the Keuper
Marls at Tuxford and Newark and many other places. The origin of these
is as follows : As the salt water from which the underlying clay has been
deposited slowly dries the salt crystals form, partly embedded in the clay,
which then becomes hardened. On the rewetting of the surface the salt
crystal is soon dissolved, while the hollow it has occupied still remains
hard for a time. The fine sand enters this and takes a cast of it, which,
when the sand consolidates into sandstone, projects from the under surface.*
In the Keuper Marls the thin sandstones are likewise often ripple-
marked, as at the Rifle Butts north of Nottingham, where they are pitted
on the surface as by annelid borings, and in Lambley Dumble and at
1 Metcalfe, 'Geology of Nottinghamshire,' loc. cit.
* Proc. Geol. Asm. vol. iv. 1875. * **«/. Mag. 1879, p. S3*-
* See Strickland, S^art. Journ. Geol. Sot. vol. ix.
27
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Newark. These peculiarities show that both one and the other division
of the Keuper were deposited between tide marks. The same condition
of deposit is indicated by the footprint of a Labyrintbodont found on the
sandstone at Colwick by Dr. Irving, and the remarkable shoal of ganoid
fishes, Semionofus, found stranded all together in one bed at Rough Hill
Wood by Mr. Wilson. It is judged from this that, as in the case of the
Coal-Measures, the base on which the deposits rested was constantly
being depressed at the same average rate as the deposits were formed,
but, as these do not contain the ordinary marine fossils, the water was
enclosed as a lake and the depression was not sufficient to open this to
the sea till the next succeeding epoch.
At a higher level the sandstones become thicker and of a brown
colour. These tend to form escarpments, as at Spital Hill near Retford,
at Bothamsall, Kirton, and Belsthorpe and Edingley Hill near South-
well.
The Keuper Marls are distinguished by the preponderance of clay
over sandstone and by the vivid red colour of the former. The beds of
sandstone are usually thin, but there are parts where each bed is thicker,
or where the thin beds are closer together, such as the neighbourhood of
Tuxford, where much stone has been extracted for building under the
name of the Tuxford Stone. Another important distinction is the
abundance of gypsum. This mineral is not unknown in the Keuper
Sandstone, where it forms fibrous strings or veins, but in workable masses
it is confined to the marls.
Gypsum is a hydrous calcium sulphate, with a composition (from a
Nottingham sample) of: calcium sulphate, 77-4 ; water, 21 ; impurities,
i '6 per cent. The crystalline form, or Se/enite, is very rarely found in these
marls and only lining accidental cavities. The commonest variety is
the saccharoidal, which is massive, brilliantly white and amorphous. The
more compact, transparent form of this, known as alabaster, has not been
found in any quantity in Notts, though worked at Chellaston over the
Derbyshire border. The fibrous variety consists of long narrow crystals
packed closely side by side obliquely to the edges of the vein or round
the boundaries of the saccharoidal masses. The play of light upon these
crystals has obtained for the variety the name of Satin Stone, under which
title it has been much worked at East Bridgeford for ornaments. The
workable variety occurs in thick nodular beds or floors, in large spheroidal
or lenticular masses called balls or bowls, or in rows of cakes.1 In places
where any large lump occurs the stratification of the surrounding marls
is disturbed on all sides as though irregularly pushed out by the growth
of the lump. This has suggested that the mineral was originally
deposited in an anhydrous form as anhydrite, and that subsequent infil-
trations of water have caused it to swell by entering into combination to
produce gypsum. " This explanation is rendered more probable by the
occurrence of centres of anhydrite in some of the larger masses at
1 See Metcalfe, Tram. Nott. Nat. Soc. for 1 894.
28
GEOLOGY
Newark and the discovery of a mass of the same mineral 9 feet thick
in the Permian Marls at Southcar boring, where no doubt it has been
protected from infiltration. The gypsum beds occur principally on two
horizons, one not far from the base which has been worked at Clarborough
and Little Gringley in the north of the county, and one at about 100
feet from the top of the marls worked at Newark, Hawton, Shelton
Orston, East Bridgford, Barton, Thrumpton, Gotham and Kingston.
The gypsum industry is an important one, 76,584 tons having been
raised in the county during 1901, out of 200,000 tons raised in the
whole of the United Kingdom. The water also from these works, and
that which is used for brewing at Newark, has an analysis closely resem-
bling that required for the production of Burton ales, viz : —
Grains per gallon
Calcium sulphate 84-93
Magnesium sulphate 23-91
Calcium carbonate 6'00
Sodium carbonate 4-45
Calcium nitrate 4-85
Sodium chloride 5-76
Alumina, etc 2-02
131-92
The Keuper Marls, from the softness of their materials, do not give
rise to such marked escarpments as the Sandstones, but only to more local
ones where their own sandstones occur, as round Tuxford and at Leverton
and Halam Hill near Southwell. On the other hand water falling on
them does not readily sink in, and numerous streams are formed which
work their way downwards to a hard band, and thus excavate narrow
ravines known as dumbles, filled with underwood, e.g. Lambley Dumble.
The Keuper beds as a whole occupy the eastern half of the county
as far south as Nottingham, at which point their outcrop is continued
up the sides of the Trent valley in a westerly direction, connecting the
bulk of them with those in the Midlands. Of this area of outcrop the
part occupied by the Sandstones is by far the narrower, indicating a
much less thickness for this portion. In the borings made on the out-
crop we only get a partial estimate of the thickness. These give at
Clifton 279 feet, at Edwalton 426 feet, at Ruddington 465 feet, from
the base to the middle of the Marls ; at Gedling 75 feet, at Thurgarton
273 feet, from the base to the commencement of the Marls ; at Tuxford
426 feet, at Southcar 714 feet, from the base to the middle of the Marls ;
and at Newark 410 feet of Marls and 175 feet of Sandstone, neither
series being complete, are found. In the borings that have commenced
on the Lias we get the full thickness at the time the Jurassic period
commenced, viz. 633 feet of Marls and 115 feet of Sandstones = 748 feet
atOwthorpe, and 688 feet of Marls and 205 feet of Sandstones =89 3 feet
at South Scarle. These figures in a general way show a thickening
to the east while the shore conglomerates have been mostly found to the
west.
29
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
THE JURASSIC SYSTEM
The beds which succeed the Keuper Marls in the east and south
borders of the county could scarcely be more contrasted with them
either in nature or contents. Any line to be drawn between two
systems on local grounds must be drawn here. Opinions have been
always more or less divided, according to the locality in which they are
studied,1 as to the position of these upper strata, whether they should be
placed in the Jurassic or Triassic systems. Here that question decides
itself in favour of the Jurassic. Although, however, these beds belong
to the same system as the Lias above them they are distinct from it and
are named Rhastic.
The RH^TIC formation here commences with Black Shales, which
rest with a sharp line of demarcation on the tea-green Marls of the
Keuper. These tea-green Marls were at one time taken as the base of
the Rhastic, but they are now believed to be merely discoloured by the
deoxidation of the red colouring matter through the decay of pyrites in
the overlying beds. The Black Shales are ' thinly laminated and contain
a few thin bands of sandstone and a bone bed at or near the base.' They
have also been called Contorta-beds from the abundance in them of the
shell Cassianella contorta. Above these come a series of ' thick bedded
light- coloured marls with yellowish fine grained limestone in irregular
nodular bands ' (Geol. Survey) often called White Lias. Each of these two
groups is about 15-20 feet thick. The Black Shales are not strong
enough to make much show on their outcrop, but the hard slabs of the
White Lias with Pleuromya croisocombeia on their surface make a slight
scarp in the neighbourhood of Elton and Barnston.
The characters of both groups are best seen in artificial openings.
At Beacon Hill, Newark, 1 9 feet of Black Shales are seen with Cassianella
contorta and ' Pullastra arenico/a,' but neither sandstone nor bone bed has
been seen in situ — the latter has probably decayed. The upper group
has only been reached by excavating through the Lias to prove its
presence. At Elton is seen a bone bed overlain by black paper-shales
and at the station the upper group. At Kelvington cutting 18 feet of
the upper group containing Estheria minuta overlay the shales. At
Gotham cutting both groups, the lower 15 feet and the upper 18 feet
thick, were found, but no bone bed. Near this spot is the Orston ' spa,'
supposed to be mineralized by the decay of pyrites from the bone bed.
At Barnston the lower group is 14—15 feet thick, and contains a pyritous
bone bed with vertebrate remains, and the upper group is 18 feet thick.
In the Midland Railway cutting at Stanton-on-the-Wold 13 feet of the
lower group were seen, including two narrow pyritous bands and Cassian-
ella contorta^ Schizodus e/ongafus, Protocardium rhceticum and Modiola minima
in the upper part and a coprolitic bone bed in the lower part, with spines,
scales, teeth and bones of the following : —
1 See Renevier, Alpes Vaudoises, InfraSas, 1864.
30
GEOLOGY
Nemacanthus filifer Hybodus reticulatus Ceratodus altus
Saurichthys acuminatus Acrodus minimus Gyrolepis tenuistriata
Hybodus minor Sargodon tomicus Ichthyosaurus platyodon
Most of these occur also at Barnstone. In the deep boring at
Owthorpe 14 feet of black paper-shales were recognized, and at South
Scarle 1 5 feet of strata have been referred to the Rhaetic.
From these observations can be seen the vast difference — lithological
and pafceontological — between the Keuper and the Rhaetic. Another
point comes out from the consideration of position and thickness. The
Black Shales are remarkable for their constancy in both respects.
Throughout their range they remain not far from the 200 feet contour
line. They are not dependent on local conditions — in fact the bone
beds of the period, though thin, are of European extent ; the fossils are
named from those of Germany and the Alps. The fish remains are all
parts only, and the bone beds being aggregate deposits, they represent the
species killed on the introduction of the new conditions.
THE LIAS. — The Lower Lias is the only part of the formation to
enter the county, and of this we have only information about the zones
near the base. It follows the Rhastic in due course with conformable strati-
fication and is made of similar material, the chief change being in the fauna.
The lowest beds belong to the Planorbis zone and consist of ' finely lamin-
ated shales interbedded with layers of fine grained argillaceous limestone.'
They are worked for hydraulic cement at Barnston, Granby, Elton, Cot-
ham, Coddington, Collingham and Balderton. At Barnston there are
ten bands of limestone in 20 feet of strata, in one of which a fine Ple-
siosaurus skeleton has been found. In one of the quarries at Coddington
another saurian skeleton was found and buried in the fallen rubbish. At
Elton there was found, prior to 1719, the hinder part of an Ichthyosaurus
skeleton, the stone containing it being turned fossil-downwards by the
side of a well. In that year, on turning up the stone, it was re-dis-
covered and sent by the rector of the parish to Dr. Stukeley, who figured
it in the Philosophical Transactions, vol. xxx. as ' a rarity the like whereof
has not been found before in this island.' It was in fact the first British
fossil reptile skeleton brought to the notice of the scientific world. Near
Gotham eight bands of limestone occur in 1 3 feet of strata with Ichthyo-
saurus tenuirostris. Saurian skeletons or remains have been found also near
Corthingstock. These beds thus well deserve the name assigned to them
in the south of England — ' The Saurian Beds.' At Balderton a coral,
Monthrualtia haimei, has been found. The ordinary mollusca from the
zone, including the characteristic ammonite Psiloceras planorbe and
fourteen others, are widely distributed.
The higher zones are probably present but are generally covered
by superficial deposits, especially in their southern range. In the east
the Angulatus beds contain nodules occasionally fossiliferous, and the
Semkottattts beds are inserted on the map, being recognized by containing
ironstones. The fossiliferous portion once exposed at Red Mile is beyond
the limits of the county.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
THE SUPERFICIAL DEPOSITS
The study of the superficial deposits is a very complicated matter
in which but little progress has been made. They include Boulder Clay,
gravels and associated sands and boulders, alluvium, blown sand and
deposits in old meres and in fissure caves.
i. Boulder Clay is an unstratified clay containing large stones, which
may be rounded, angular or scratched, and include some which are
foreign to the district. Its distribution in Notts is almost entirely con-
fined to the southern and eastern borders. In the south it caps an escarp-
ment of Marlstone except along the earlier formed valleys, where it
descends to lower levels, as at Stanton-on-the- Wolds. Further north it
descends to the limit of the Lower Lias escarpment, and still further north
to the highest Keuper escarpment. Within these limits, except at one
locality, there is nothing but gravel. Two varieties of Boulder Clay
have been observed during the excavation of the cuttings and tunnel for
the Midland Railway near Stanton and Plumtree. The lower of these is
50 feet thick and encloses fragments from the surrounding solid rocks,
with foreign pebbles from various members of the Carboniferous system.
It rests at a height of about 200 feet upon Black Shales which have been
contorted in a direction showing pressure from the north-west. On these
grounds it may be considered to have been brought by ice, forced to
travel in a south-east direction. Associated with the lower Boulder Clay
was an enormous block of Millstone Grit1 ; and a mass of basaltic rock
described by Mr. Toplis in i8i42 between Barton and Thrumpton is
probably another large boulder.
An upper Boulder Clay rests, near the entrance to the Stanton tunnel,
at a level of 230 feet upon a floor of Lias limestone which is striated in
a direction E.N.E. to W.S.W. and contains, amongst other boulders,
fragments of chalk and flint. The ice that brought it is judged therefore
to have come from the E.N.E. The same kind of Boulder Clay forms
the summit of the cutting at Plumtree at a somewhat lower level. It is
this also that lies on the rocks of lower geological horizons in the north-
east. The exceptional instance of a Boulder Clay not on the borders of
the Trent basin is at Kneesall Hill,3 reaching a height of 300 feet.
This clay contains fragments of Trias Sandstone, Liassic and Oolitic
Limestones and Chalk, mixed with rounded or striated fragments of
Carboniferous rocks with slate and quartzite probably derived from an
earlier Boulder Clay. The rest of the country has not been examined
with sufficient care to enable it to be said that no other exception can
be found.
In other cases towards the south-west old stratified clay has been
churned up, and pebbles, usually of quartzite, forced into it on the spot.
Such cases for instance are known in relation to the Permian Marls west
of Bulwell at a height of about 170 feet above O.D.; and at Wilsthorpe,
1 Deeley, Stuart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xlii. * Annals of Pbiksophy, vol. iii.
3 Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 83.
32
GEOLOGY
just over the Derbyshire border, Keuper Marls have been thus treated
from a level of 54 feet to 128 feet. In these cases only the pebbles
seem to have been brought from a distance, and it is rather uncertain
at what stage of the history they arrived.
2. The gravels are of two kinds, those connected with the river
Trent itself and those not so connected. The latter are the most wide-
spread of all the superficial deposits and present the greatest difficulties,
whether considered to have been formed on the land or beneath the sea,
especially as they have not yet been sufficiently studied. Two sources of
these gravels may be recognized, corresponding more or less closely to
those of the two Boulder Clays, viz. one from the west or north-west and
one from the east or E.N.E.
The gravel from the west is a high level gravel. The lowest and
most southerly spot at which indications of it have been met with is on
the hills to the west of Arnold, where comparatively large boulders of
Carboniferous limestone and volcanic rocks lie on the surface of the
Bunter Pebble Beds at a height of 300 feet. At a spot a mile north of
Watnall loose and large pebbles lie in a patch on the Magnesian Lime-
stone at a height of 440 feet. A mile further north commences the high
ridge of the Long Hills, composed at the base of Lower Red Sandstone,
and covered to the top with gravel, including large rounded boulders of
syenite, like that of Buttermere, and smaller ones of a felspar-porphyry
and of a compact lava resembling the Iron Crag lava of Keswick. This
ridge rises to a height of over 500 feet. Where the Pebble Beds come on
in Annesley Park they are capped by a long ridge of gravel rising to
580 feet along the nearly level top. About the middle of this ridge is a
sand pit, showing on the east side a quantity of white sand,1 irregularly
bedded, with a streak of broken coal fragments, overlying obliquely a
pebbly mass in which the bulk of the subangular fragments, some of
fairly large size, consist of the Permian limestone with casts of Schizodus,
and of pieces of Carboniferous sandstone. A portion of this limestone
gravel, which differs in no other way from the rest, is consolidated into
an irregular pipe of rock, probably by the action of percolating water
dissolving and redepositing the calcareous matter from the finer particles.
At the north end of the plantation is a long gravel pit where the boulders
are of various sizes and materials, with a similar consolidation in parts,
and surrounding in one spot a large mass of Pebble Bed rock. Further
on in the same direction the gravel-covered hills rise to the highest point
in the county, in the Robin Hood's Hills, at 625 feet. From this point
eastward to Blidworth there are other gravel pits, in one of which the
gravel is again consolidated as in a vertical pipe, and just before reaching
Blidworth are seen the well known ' Druidical Remains,' which consist
of similar consolidated masses, shaped by the hand of man and containing
as before many fragments of Permian limestone. Beyond this point the
gravels have not yet been traced. Further north at Mansfield Woodhouse,
1 Cf. Deeley, loc. cit.
1 33 5
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
resting at a base level of 320 feet on the Lower Red Sandstone or Permian,
occurs a repetition of the gravels of the Long Hills with many rounded
masses of decayed volcanic ash, suggesting as before a Lake District
origin. The gravels, however, do not extend much further, as near
Worksop there is no trace of them.1
Near where this gravel lies are some enormous boulders. Thus,
two flat blocks of Millstone Grit, one deeply scored with glacial striae, lie
in the valley west of the Long Hills, and a boulder of 24 cubic feet of
a tough volcanic ash lies by the stream side to the north of the same
hills at a height of 390 feet; a large basaltic rock of 27 cubic feet lies on
the road from Kirkby Forest to Sherwood Place at a height of 555 feet,
and a similar rock, but smaller in size, rests by the pump in the centre of
Blidworth village at 436 feet.
The varying heights and the changes of the underlying rock where
this gravel is found show us the form and character of the surface of the
country on which they were deposited, since the contour has not there
been sensibly modified by denudation ; how far it has changed where they
do not lie cannot so easily be stated, but probably not much, and as the Ere-
wash valley contains few or no drift deposits it may be suggested that it
was occupied by a field of ice which in its motion pushed up the boulders
and carried forward the gravel as in a great terminal moraine. Possibly
the occupation of the great Trent basin by gravel instead of by Boulder
Clay may be explained in a similar but not identical manner.
Similar gravel is found at the Grove Castle near Retford containing
' a large pebble of coarsely crystalline granite with pinkish grey matrix
and dark prismatic crystals,' and a large block of Millstone Grit at 300 feet.
The broken ridge of 140-250 feet above O.D. that runs from Newington
near Bawtry by Everton to Gringley is capped by gravel containing
abundant fragments of Permian limestone,' and at Gringley a large
boulder, 30 cubic feet in size, of Carboniferous crinoidal limestone lies
at a point 275 feet above O.D.3
Gravels containing materials derived from the east have been very
little investigated. At Osberton near Worksop at about 60 feet above
O.D. two unnamed shells, identified by Professor E. Forbes with species
living in the German Ocean, are said to have been found2; in gravel
that lies near the side of Rainworth Water, north-west of Blidworth, a
specimen of Gryphcea arcuata from the Lias and pieces of apparently
Triassic sandstone have been noted ; at Kersall the gravel underlying the
Boulder Clay contains fragments of Chalk and Lias3 ; and there are
other noteworthy patches at Wilford Hill, Orton and Newark which
do not appear to be connected with the Trent drainage.
Gravels deposited by the Trent are widely distributed along or near
its course, as at Beeston 30 feet above its present level, near Col wick
siding, at Gamston and east of Newark and many other places. The
1 Fox-Strangways, Quart. Journ. Geol. Sue. vol. liv.
' Thorpe, Geol. and Pal. Sue. Yorkshire Proc. vol. »v.
8 Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 83.
34
GEOLOGY
pebbles in such gravels are to a large extent composed of the materials
of all the older gravels and are therefore very mixed. The remarkable
point about them is the evidence they afford of the recrudescence of
glacial conditions,1 at all events near Nottingham. The Beeston gravels
are wonderfully contorted,2 and so are those at Spring Close, Lenton 3
and Gamston. The pressing of pebbles into the Triassic Marls at the
Nottingham sewage-farm excavations and the contortions of the same
Marls at Ratcliffe-on-Trent are apparently related phenomena. There is
no alternative to the conclusion that these contortions were produced by
stranded ice, and it was not the same ice that brought the pebbles, since
some of them came from the east.
This conclusion is to be borne in mind in reference to the other point
of interest in relation to the Trent gravels. Their wide distribution to
the east of Newark and beyond the limits of Notts to the other side of
the Lincoln gorge, suggested to Mr. Penning that the Trent had changed
its course since they began to be deposited,* having originally reached
the sea along the lower course of the Witham. A study of the higher
course of the Trent gives little support to this hypothesis, for it preserves
throughout the same relation to the Trias and Rhaetic, and there is no
sign of change in this respect near or north of Newark. On the other
hand the gravel is carried at least as far as Fledborough, near which is a
buried channel, larger and deeper than the present Trent.5 Meanwhile
the occurrence of glacial conditions at a later date affords the means by
which gravels originally deposited on one side of the Lincoln gorge
might be carried to the other side across a low watershed in a manner
which cannot be dealt with here.
3. The alluvium of the Trent calls for little remark. It is fairly
abundant all along the course of the river, and especially so on the west
side of Newark opposite the gravels on the east. The Trent has
obviously varied its course considerably within the limits of its alluvium
in comparatively recent times, since here and there the remains of various
animals have been buried beneath it. Thus teeth of the mammoth have
been reported from Island Street, Nottingham " and near Wilford ; antlers
of the red deer near North Clifton 7 ; and antlers of the red deer, bones
of the ox and horse and a human skull (described by Professor Huxley 8
as belonging to a dwarf race commonly found in Irish tumuli) are re-
ported by Mr. Drake from Muskham.7 These are usually found at a
depth of 25 to 30 feet.
4. Blown Sand is found on the east side of the Trent from North
Collingham to North Clifton. This being N.N.E. of the great spread
of alluvium above mentioned may indicate prevalent S.S.W. winds in
this district. Another area of blown sand is at Misterton in the extreme
north of the county.
» Cf. Deeley, loc. cit.
J Shipman, Midi. Nat. vol. v. ' Shipman, Geol. of Lenton.
* A. J. Jukes-Browne, £>uart. Journ. Geol. Sac. vol. xxxix. and Geol. Survey Mem. sheet 83.
5 Fox-Strangways, Stuart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. liv.
6 White's Directory, 1864. 7 Geologist, vol. iv. 8 Ibid. vol. v.
35
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
5. Deposits in old meres occur to the north and west of Bingham at a
height of 50 feet above Trent level. They are mapped as alluvium, but
consist of black earth, 3—4 ft. thick, and contain twenty-four species
of land and freshwater mollusca.1 Similar meres filled up with black
soil are known at Gotham Moor and at Scarthingmoor by Tuxford, with
seventeen recorded species.1 Black soil is also recorded overlying a cal-
careous tufa at Lambley or containing tree stumps in the Leen valley.3
6. Deposits in fissure caves. — Caves or fissures are known to occur in
the Magnesian Limestone at two localities, both of which are by the
sides of rivers forming the boundary of the county on the west side.
Creswell Crags are on the Poulter, a tributary of the Idle, and Pleasley is
on the Meden, but of the numerous caves at Creswell only one is in
Notts, and the single fossiliferous cave at Pleasley is over the border in
Derbyshire. The single Notts cave is called the Church Hole.3 It is a
fissure opened in the clifF and runs in a north and south direction, com-
mencing 1 4 feet above the river and extending upwards for 40 feet. The
deposits within it are : a bed of red sand overlain by several varieties of
cave-earth, the whole being covered with stalagmitic breccia. Of the
animal remains here buried, the jaw of a polecat is peculiar to the red
sand, and a limb bone of the cave-lion to the cave earth. The rest are
common to both ; they include the —
Spotted hyaena
Fox
Wolf
Bear
Reindeer
Irish elk
Bison
Horse
Woolly rhinoceros
Mammoth
Hare
Of human implements, rude ones made of quartz, etc., occur alone
in the red sand, but they are accompanied in the cave earth by imple-
ments of flint, also needle, awl, and a notched instrument, and a rounded
spearhead all made of bone, and a straight rod cut from a reindeer's
antler.
To complete the picture of the associates of the first inhabitants of
Nottinghamshire the list of additional mammals found in the caves just
over the border may be given : —
Sabre-toothed lion
Lion
Wild cat
Leopard
Wild boar
Hippopotamus
Field mouse
To this list must be added the lynx found in 1866 at Pleasley Yew
Tree Cave by Dr. Ransom.4 The men whose works are associated with
these are considered to be of Palaeolithic age, though one of them was
an artist and carved on the surface of a bone the picture of a domesti-
cated horse.
1 C. T. Musson, Jeurn. Conchology, vol. iv.
* Shipman, Midi. Nat. vol. vi.
3 J. M. Mello and W. B. Dawkins, £>uart. Jeurn. Geol. Sac. vol. xxxiii.
* Rep. Brit.Atsoc. 1866.
PALEONTOLOGY
IN the domain of vertebrate palaeontology Nottingham is a county
which has but small claim to distinction, very few fossil forms from
within its limits having apparently been recorded in scientific publi-
cations. Of these ' finds ' the majority are mentioned in a pamphlet
by Professor J. W. Carr, published at Nottingham in 1893 for the
meeting of the British Association at that city, under the title of A Con-
tribution to the Geology and Natural History of Nottinghamshire, To that
gentleman the present writer is also indebted for information with regard
to other fossils from the county in the museum at Nottingham.
Commencing with the remains of Pleistocene mammals, it has first
of all to be mentioned that one of the well known Creswell caves lies on
the Nottinghamshire side of the river, although the others are in Derby-
shire. The cave in question is known as the Church Hole, and an
account of its excavation and the remains discovered is given by the
Rev. J. M. Mello.1 The species of mammals discovered in this cave
include the cave hyaena (Hycena crocuta spelcea), badger (Me/es meles),
wolf (Canis lupus), brown bear (Ursus arctus], common hare (Lepus euro-
pceus), reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), extinct Irish deer or ' Irish elk '
(Cervus giganteus), the Pleistocene bison (Eos priscus), wild horse (Equus
caballusfossilis), woolly rhinoceros (Rhinoceros antiquitatis] and the hairy
elephant, or mammoth (Elephas primigenius). Among these the remains
of the horse were especially abundant. As in the case of other caves,
the bones of the larger mammals are presumed to have been dragged
into Church Hole by the hyaenas, which made it their den. If this be
correct, it indicates two features by which the extinct cave hyaenas
differed from their South African representatives. For according to the
reports of travellers and sportsmen the African spotted hyaena does not
dwell in caves, while its food consists mainly of antelopes and not of the
bones of such large animals as elephants and rhinoceroses.
Another locality for Pleistocene mammals, lying on the borderland
of Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, is the Pleasley Vale near Mansfield.
The bone cavern known as the Yew Tree Cave is, however, just on
the north side of the river Meden, and therefore in Derbyshire. From
that cave, it may be mentioned, has been obtained the imperfect skull
of a lynx (Fe/is lynx), now preserved in the museum at Nottingham.
Other mammals recorded as fossils from Pleasley Vale — whether belong-
1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. xxxiii. 585 (1877).
37
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
ing to Nottinghamshire or Derbyshire I cannot say — are the wolf, rein-
deer, horse and woolly rhinoceros.
Although river gravels and alluvium occur at various places in the
Trent valley, they appear to have yielded few mammalian remains.
The Nottingham Museum possesses however several fine molar teeth
of the mammoth which have been obtained from the old alluvium
of the Trent valley, either in the course of street excavations in Not-
tingham itself, or by dredging in the bed of the river near the town.
Since the foregoing was in type, I have received from the Rev.
T. B. Chamberlin a note on some mammalian remains, associated with a
number of species of land and freshwater shells obtained from the layer
above the peat in the valley between North and South Wheatley, near
Retford. Acccording to Mr. Chamberlin's determinations, the mam-
malian remains include the base of an antler of the roebuck (Capreo/us
capreolus), a horn-core of the extinct bison (Bison priscus), a portion of
the antler of the extinct Irish deer (Cervus giganteus), and several antlers
of red deer. The Irish deer antler has a basal girth of 20 inches ; the
brow-tine is 15! inches in length and 5 inches in girth ; and the portion
of the beam still remaining, which is broken off just below the palma-
tion, is 13 inches in length from above the origin of the brow-tine.
Passing on to older formations, a considerable amount of interest
attaches to certain remains of plesiosaurians, or long-necked extinct
marine reptiles from the Lower Lias of the county preserved in the
British Museum. One of these is chiefly interesting on account of
having been discovered so long ago as the year 1719. It consists of a
slab of Lias limestone from Elston near Newark containing the im-
pression of the hinder part of the skeleton of a small plesiosaur, which
has been provisionally referred to the common P/esiosaurus dolichodlrus*
In the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society for 1719* it was
regarded by its describer, William Stukeley, as probably representing
the remains of a crocodile or a cetacean, the existence of such a re-
markable group of reptiles as the plesiosaurians being at that time quite
unsuspected. The specimen was originally in the possession of the
Royal Society, by the council of which body it was presented to the
British Museum.
The second specimen, which is from the Lower Lias near Granby,
is of importance on account of the comparative rarity of the species
(Eretmosaurus rugosus) to which it belongs. It was presented to the
British Museum by the Duke of Rutland in 1841, and consists of a
slab showing the lower aspect of the nearly entire skeleton, from which
however the skull is wanting.3 It was described and figured by Sir R.
Owen (as P/esiosaurus rugosus) in his ' Liassic Reptilia.'4 The genus
Eretmosaurus, it may be observed, is chiefly distinguished from the
typical P/esiosaurus by certain well marked differences in the form and
relations of the scapula and coracoid bones.
i Cat. Fast. Rtpt. Brit. Mut. ii. 259. * pp. 936-8, pi. i.
s See Cat. Pass. Reft. Brit. Mut. ii. 250. * Man. Pal. Soc. pt. iii. p. 34 (1865).
38
PALEONTOLOGY
In addition to the foregoing specimens mention must also be made
of a fine plesiosaurian skull from the Lower Lias of Cropwell Bishop
recently acquired by the Nottingham University College Museum.
The generic and specific determination of this specimen does not hitherto
appear to have been attempted. It is stated in Mr. W. J. Harrison's
Geology of the Counties of ILngland1 that remains of plesiosaurs together
with those of ichthyosaurs — another group of marine reptiles confined
to the Secondary period — occur plentifully in the Lower Lias near
Cortlingstock.
From the Rhaetic deposits of the county have been obtained,
according to Prof. Carr, presumed reptilian coprolites, which may belong
to one or both of the aforesaid groups.
Footprints of amphibians are rare in the Keuper formation of the
county, but one example from the foot of the railway cutting at Colwick
is now in the possession of the Nottingham High School. There is
also a statement1 to the effect that amphibian footprints, of the type
known as Chirosaurus or Cbirotberium^ have been observed in the Keuper
sandstone of Weston ClifF, on the Nottinghamshire side of the Trent.
And Mr. Harrison 3 likewise states that similar footprints have been
met with in the Keuper south of Ollerton. Such footprints, it may be
well to mention, were probably made by gigantic primeval salamanders
or labyrinthodonts, allied to or identical with Mastodonsaurus. Foot-
prints of the same nature likewise occur in the Permian Magnesian
Limestone at Mansfield, and there is a fine slab displaying a number of
such impressions in the Nottingham University College Museum.
Fish remains appear to be very scarce in the Secondary formations
of the county, but from the Rhstic Prof. Carr records, bones, teeth and
fin spines assigned to the genera Hybodus, Nemacantbus, Acrodus, Gyro/epis,
Saurichthys and Ceratodus.
Of much greater interest however are numerous remains of the
ganoid or enamel-scaled fish known as Semionotus brodiei^ which occurs
typically in the Keuper of Warwickshire. The Nottinghamshire speci-
mens were discovered in 1879 by Mr. E. Wilson* in the roof of a
tunnel which was at that time being driven through the so-called ' water-
stones ' of the Upper Keuper at Colwick Wood near Nottingham for
the Lean valley outfall sewer. In recording this ' find ' Mr. Wilson
makes the following observations : —
In addition to the exceptional interest that is always to be derived from the pre-
sence of organic remains in Triassic rocks, as a rule so barren of life, there were two
points specially noticeable in connection with the occurrence of these fossils in the
Keuper at Nottingham ; namely, first, the great number of the fishes, there being
quite a shoal of them for a distance of 30 feet or thereabouts in the line of section,
the individual fishes even lying over one another in the middle portion of that distance,
but gradually becoming more widely separated in either direction until they finally
came to an end ; and, secondly, their occurrence at the junction of two formations of
the Trias, namely, of the waterstones of the Upper Keuper and the basement beds
(Lower Keuper).
1 p. 211. 2 See Hall, Mem. Geol. Survey United Kingdom (1860). 3 Op. cit.
* See Quart. Journ. Geol. Sac. xliii. 542 (1887).
39
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
No record of fish remains appears to exist from the Permian of the
county, but about twenty years ago there were discovered in the roof of
a coal-seam in Clifton Colliery teeth, spines and vertebras of large fishes.
The spines were reported to resemble those of the Palaeozoic genera
Ctenacanthus and Gyracantbus, but it does not appear that any proper
description of the specimens has ever been published.
40
BOTANY
I
earliest records of Nottinghamshire plants are contained in
the Phytologia Britannica of William How, published in 1650.
In this work Nottinghamshire localities are given on the
authority of Mr. Stonehouse for Dianthus deltoids s, Gnaphalium
dioicum, and a grass which was probably Melica nutans. Sixteen years
later Christopher Merrett in his Pinax mentions, in addition to the above,
Sparganium minimum and a white-flowered form of Galeopsis versicolor.
These were probably found by Thomas Willisell, who travelled all over
Great Britain in search of plants, and visited Nottingham about this
time. He was the first botanist to observe Silene nutans on the walls of
Nottingham Castle. The celebrated John Ray was at Wollaton Hall in
1670, and records in his correspondence and botanical works a number
of Nottinghamshire plants, among which are Silene nutans, previously
discovered by Willisell, Cerastium arvense, Teesdalia nudicaulis, Verbascum
puherulentum, and Apera Spica-venti. One or two other unimportant
records are given in the Dillenian edition of Ray's Synopsis, published
in 1724, but no further additions of any consequence were published
until Deering's Catalogus Stirpium, etc., or Catalogue of Plants naturally
growing . . . about Nottingham, appeared in 1738.
Charles Deering, M.D., was born in Saxony, probably in 1695, and
after graduating in physic at Leyden came to England and practised
for some years at Bedford, London, and Rochester. He settled in
Nottingham in 1736, and remained there until his death on 12 April,
1749. He was buried in St. Peter's churchyard. His Catalogue contains
about 840 separate entries of Phanerogamic and Cryptogamic plants, a
few of which are errors of identification, a few are cultivated plants only,
and some others are unimportant varieties of other species. Considering,
however, the paucity of works of reference, and the lack of facilities for
travelling at this remote period, as well as the fact that the book was
apparently the result of only two years' research, it displays truly remark-
able industry and ability on the part of the author.
Most of the references to Nottinghamshire plants in the various
botanical works published in the latter half of the eighteenth century are
copied from Deering, but some additional Nottinghamshire records are
given in a paper by R. Pulteney on the rarer plants growing about
Loughborough, published in vol. xlix of the Philosophical Transactions,
and in Nichols' History and Antiquities of the County of Leicester (1795).
i 41 6
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
The Botanist's Guide of Turner and Dillwyn (1805) gives a list of the
rarer plants of Nottinghamshire, mostly copied from Deering, but with a
few new species added.
In 1807 Thomas Ordoyno of Newark published his Flora Notting-
hamiensis, which comprised the flowering plants and vascular cryptogams,
and included many species unknown to Deering. Although by no
means free from error, the publication of this work seems to have given
an impetus to the study of the county flora, for the first half of the
nineteenth century was a fruitful period in the history of Nottingham-
shire botany. Among the numerous workers of this time, two men,
Thomas Jowett and Godfrey Howitt, M.D., stand out conspicuously.
Born in 1801 at Colwick (where his father was steward to the
Musters family), Thomas Jowett received a medical education and
practised in Nottingham for about ten years. In 1831 his health broke
down, and he retired to the village of Morton in the Trent Vale, where
he died in the following year at the early age of 31. From boyhood
Jowett seems to have been keenly interested in the plants of his native
county, and in 1826, when only 25 years old, he published in the
Nottingham Journal, under the pseudonym of ' II Rosajo,' a series of
' Botanical Calendars,' or ' Notices of Native Plants of the County of Not-
tingham, arranged according to the order of their appearance.' These
calendars, twenty-eight in number, appeared at frequent intervals from
March to December, and are as remarkable for their admirable literary
style as for the evidence they afford of their author's intimate acquaintance
with the county flora and with the botanical and poetical literature of his
time. Localities are given for 1,023 species of flowering plants and
cryptogams, including more than 100 species not mentioned in the
works of Deering and Ordoyno. Four volumes of dried specimens of
Nottinghamshire plants collected and mounted by Jowett are preserved
in the Bromley House Library at Nottingham. These are particularly
valuable as settling the identity of several species which are not now to
be found in the county.
Dr. Howitt, the friend and co-worker of Jowett, was born in 1800,
and after graduating in medicine at Edinburgh, practised as a physician
in Nottingham. In 1839 he emigrated to Australia, and died there in
1873. His Nottinghamshire Flora, the latest work devoted to the plants
of the county, appeared in 1839, and is a tiny volume of 124 pages,
recording 1,137 species of plants, of which 866 are phanerogams, ferns,
etc., and the rest are mosses, hepatics, lichens, and algae. There is not a
word of preface or introduction, no attempt is made to distinguish
between indigenous plants and those of doubtful nativity, and the informa-
tion about each species is confined within the narrowest possible limits.
It must, however, be remembered that the work was published during
the year in which Dr. Howitt left England, and was probably prepared
very hurriedly, with the object of placing his extensive knowledge of the
county flora at the disposal of other local botanists. As a record of the
composition of our flora at a period when it was still comparatively
42
BOTANY
unmodified by modern industrial developments, Howitt's Flora is, in
common with Jowett's Calendars, of the greatest value to modern
workers.
Six years before the publication of his Flora, Dr. Howitt (in con-
junction with Wm. Valentine, F.L.S., a talented Nottingham bryologist)
issued three parts of a Muscologia Nottingbamiensis, consisting of dried
specimens of local mosses with descriptive letterpress. Presumably from
lack of support no further numbers of this work were published.
The New Botanist's Guide by H. C. Watson (1835-7) contains a
long list of Nottinghamshire plants, which was drawn up mainly from
a marked catalogue, accompanied by numerous specimens, supplied to
Mr. Watson by Mr. T. H. Cooper. The specimens were given to
Mr. Cooper by Dr. Howitt for conveyance to the author of the N. B. G.,to
be used in drawing up the county list. They must therefore be accepted
as evidence of the occurrence in Nottinghamshire of the species they
represent, but as Mr. Cooper ' was almost a stranger in the county, and
had enjoyed few opportunities of botanizing there,' and as, moreover,
the catalogue contains many obvious inaccuracies, the records which
are unsupported by actual specimens must be ignored. In the N. B. G.
Supplement a new list of Nottinghamshire plants, drawn up from the
advance sheets of Dr. Howitt's Flora, is given to replace that supplied by
Mr. Cooper.
The published botanical literature of Nottinghamshire since the
time of Howitt is very scanty. Lists of the plants of the county, or of
parts of it, such as Sherwood Forest, have appeared from time to time in
sundry directories and guide-books, and a few new species have been
recorded in various botanical works and periodicals by E. J. Lowe,
J. Bohler, Hilderic Friend, J. K. Miller, H. Fisher, and the writer, but
an up-to-date Flora of Nottinghamshire is still a desideratum.
A modern account of Nottinghamshire botany, when compared
with the records of Jowett and Howitt, furnishes melancholy evidence of
the large number of interesting plants which, once common, have now
become exceedingly rare or altogether extinct. The enormous growth
of the city of Nottingham has covered some of our best collecting grounds
with buildings, while the cultivation of waste lands, the drainage of
bogs, the multiplication of railways and collieries, and the conversion of
large areas of arable land into pasture, have all been potent agents in the
destruction of our native plants. Nor are we compensated for their loss
by the numerous aliens — waifs and strays from foreign lands — which are
making their appearance along railway lines and canals, and about malt
kilns and grain warehouses, brought over with grain, fodder, and other
merchandise from abroad. Perhaps the most famous of our disappearing
plants — though of course not a true native — is the purple spring crocus
(Crocus vernus), which formerly covered many acres of the Nottingham
meadows with such a luxuriant growth as to suggest the idea of its
having been sown as a crop. Much of the ground this beautiful plant
occupied is now built over, and although it is still common in places its
43
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
habitat becomes more restricted year by year. In the same locality grew
abundantly the autumnal crocus (C. nudiflorus], first recorded as a
British plant in 1738 by Dr. Charles Deering, who found it 'in Notting-
ham meadows and about Trent Bridge.' I have seen it in some numbers
within the last fifteen years in a field close to Trent Bridge, but the
locality has recently been built upon. The plant still, however, persists
in fair quantity in some of the Trent meadows. The wild tulip
(Tulipa sylvestris) also was formerly common in the Nottingham and
Beeston meadows, although it never flowered in its wild state, and
usually put forth only a single leaf. It has long disappeared from its
old headquarters, but still occurs higher up the Trent Valley at Thrump-
ton. The Nottingham catchfly (Silene nutans], first recorded for Britain
by Ray in 1 670 as growing ' on the walls of Nottingham Castle,' was
still common on the ruined walls of the old kitchens of the castle up to
about fifteen years ago, but the recent restoration of this part of the
castle has destroyed it. It is quite possible, however, that a few plants
may still linger on the inaccessible parts of the castle rock.
The draining of the few small areas of bog which formerly existed
in the county is responsible for the extinction or extreme rarity of a number
of interesting species; such are the royal fern (Osmunda regalis), Lastrea
Thelypteris, L. uliginosa, and L. Oreopteris, the bog orchis (Epipactis palus-
fris), bladderwort (Utricularia vulgaris), butterwort (Pinguicula vu/garis),
sundew (Drosera rotundifolia), cranberry (Schollera Oxycoccos), Vaccinium
Vitis-idaea, buckbean (Menyanthes), the beautiful Gentiana Pneumonantbe,
Schoenus nigricans, and others. On the other hand the rare crested fern
(Lastrea cristata) still persists in its ancient station, along with the crow-
berry (TLmpetruni) \ the sweet-gale (Myrica Gale) also maintains its foot-
hold in some quantity in a single locality; and the bog pimpernel
(Anagallis tenella), and cotton grasses, Eriopborum vaginatum and angusti-
folium, may still be found.
Other interesting plants which formerly occurred, but have not been
seen for many years, are Viola stagnina and V. lutea, Dianthus deltoides,
Cerastium quaternellum, Hypericum montanum, Geranium sangulneum and
G. lucidum, Cicuta virosa, Myrrbis Odorata, Bupleurum rotundifolium, Anten-
naria dioica, Cnicus pratensis, Crepis paludosa, Pyrola minor, Rbinantbus
major, Littorella juncea, Galeopsis ocbroleuca, Rumex maritimus and R.pulcher,
Cephalanthera ensifolia and C. pallens, Orchis ustulata, Stratiotes aloides,
Scheuchzeria palustris, Carex digitata, Melica nutans, Hordeum syhaticum,
Ceterach officinarum, Cystopteris fragilis, etc. Turning from this
melancholy list of probable extinctions it is a pleasure to note that
a fair number of species which have always been rare in the county
still persist. Among these are Arabis perfoliata, Lotus tenuis, Stum lati-
fohum, Dipsacus pilosus, Inula Conyza, Monotropa Hypopitys, Samolus
Valerandi, Melampyrum pratense, Ophrys apifera and O. muscifera,
Gagea fascicularis, Acorus Calamus, Carex Pseudo-cyperus, Apera Spica-
venti, etc. Moreover, a number of truly native species which were
unknown to or not distinguished by the earlier Nottinghamshire botanists
44
BOTANY
have been discovered in recent years ; e.g., several Batrachian Ranunculi,
Cardamlne flexuosa, Neckeria claviculata, Viola permixta, V. sihestris and
V. ericetorum, Polygala serpyllacea and P. oxyptera, Stellaria umbrosa, Ulex
Gallii, Agrimonia odorata, Callitriche stagnalis, C. obtusangula, and C.
truncata (the last-named a very remarkable and interesting addition to
our flora, first found by Mr. H. Fisher in the Rainworth Water),
Epilobium angustifolium and E. adnatum, Carum segefum, Arctium majus
and A. minus, Arnoseris pusilla, Hypochaeris glabra, Gentiana baltica,
Mentha alopecuroides and others, Polygonum mite, Rumex limosu;, Habenaria
chloroleuca, Orchis incarnata, Potamogeton coloratus, P. falcatus, P. prae-
longus, and P. Cooperi, Scirpus Tabernaemontani and S. maritimus, Carex
curta and C. binervis, Agrostis nigra, Glyceria plicata, Bromus erectus,
many Rubi, Roses, a few Hieracia, Willows, etc.
If we compare the flora of Nottinghamshire with that of Great Britain
and of the counties bordering upon Nottinghamshire the result is at first
sight somewhat disappointing. The number of species of flowering plants
and vascular cryptogams enumerated in the ninth edition of the London
Catalogue of British Plants is 1,930, but thirty-eight of these are confined
to Ireland or the Channel Islands, leaving 1,892 species for Great Britain
proper. But of this number between 230 and 240 have no claim to be
regarded as native plants, and if we neglect these we are left with about
1, 660 species indigenous to Great Britain. If now we turn to the counties
forming the boundaries of Nottinghamshire we find the recorded species of
' wild ' plants (including true natives, colonists, and denizens) to be as
follows: — West Yorkshire, 1,042;* Derbyshire, 91 1;2 Leicestershire,
825 ;8 Lincolnshire, 1,040.* In Nottinghamshire the number of species
which come under the same category is 854. In attempting to account
for this apparent poverty in our flora it must be borne in mind that of
the i, 660 or so vascular plants which occur in Great Britain in a wild
state about 350 species are either purely maritime or are confined to high
latitudes or mountains, and are therefore necessarily absent from Notting-
hamshire. This reduces the number that could possibly be expected to
occur in the county to little more than 1,300 ; but, as we have seen, we
actually possess barely two-thirds of this number. The reason for this
is to be sought in the comparative lack of variety in the physical con-
ditions of Nottinghamshire combined with the highly cultivated state of
most of its area. There is scarcely any uncultivated ground with the
exception of parts of Sherwood Forest, and this being situated on the
dry and arid Bunter sandstone possesses only a poor and scanty flora :
even in the wooded parts of the forest the undergrowth consists almost
entirely of bracken. There are few or no large sheets of water save the
trimly-kept artificial lakes in the principal parks, and there is an almost
complete absence of bog, so that lacustrine and bog-loving plants are
largely wanting. Moreover, the Carboniferous, Jurassic, and Cretaceous
1 Lees, Flora of West Yorks. ' Linton, Flora of Deri. * Flora ofLeic.
4 Lond. Catalogue, marked for Lincolnshire by Rev. E. A. Woodruffe-Peacock. This number is
probably excessive, as some of the species marked must be aliens or casuals in Lincolnshire.
45
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
limestones which bear so rich a flora in the neighbouring counties do not
extend into Nottinghamshire, and their absence is only partially com-
pensated for by the Permian Magnesian Limestone which occupies the
western margin of the county, and, while possessing a moderately rich and
varied flora, cannot compare in this respect with the more highly calca-
reous Chalk, Oolite, or Mountain Limestone of the counties around us.
West Yorkshire, with an area of 2,760 square miles, is more than
three times the size of Nottinghamshire, and with its numerous hills —
many of which are over 2,000 feet in height — possesses an extensive
alpine or true mountain flora which could not exist with us ; while the
' pavements,' terraces, and scars of the Mountain Limestone region, and
the wide expanses of peat bog, are tenanted by numerous species which
for lack of suitable conditions are absent from Nottinghamshire. The
same remarks apply in a less degree to Derbyshire, which possesses a
considerable number of montane plants on its high northern moorlands ;
the flora of its limestone dales also is a very rich and varied one.
Lincolnshire, with an area greater even than that of West Yorkshire,
with its long line of sea-coast, its salt-marshes, its chalk wolds and
Jurassic limestones, has an enormous advantage, botanically, over Not-
tinghamshire, and it is not surprising that its flora is numerically so
much stronger than that of its inland neighbour. Leicestershire has a
slightly smaller area than Nottinghamshire, with a very similar flora,
except that the Archaean rocks which form the high ground of
Charnwood Forest support a few species which are not found with us.
, In order to indicate the geographical distribution of our native
plants throughout the British counties, Great Britain is divided up for
botanical purposes into 1 1 2 areas consisting of counties and vice-counties,
the latter being formed by sub-dividing the larger counties into two or
more parts.1 Taking the London Catalogue of British Plants, ed. 9, as
our authority, we find that of our 1,930 species of native vascular plants
seventy-nine have been recorded as occurring in every one of these 1 1 2
counties and vice-counties, and no fewer than 300 species are found in 100
or more divisions. Of these 300, 299 are recorded for Nottinghamshire,
and the single unrecorded species, Potamogeton polygonifolius, is almost sure
to be found, although up to the present it has been searched for in vain.
There are 102 species with a census number between 90 and 100,
i.e., occurring in from 90 to 100 counties and vice-counties, and of these
we have all but the following : — Oenanthe crocata^ Narthecium ossifragum,
Juncus Gerardi, and Scirpus pauciflorus. It is probable that the Narthecium
once occurred, but it has not been seen for at least a century.
Of the eighty-five species with a census number between eighty
and ninety, six are apparently wanting in Nottinghamshire, viz. :
Cochlearia officinalis (a maritime and montane plant recorded by Deering,
but probably in error), Hypericum Androsaemum (has occurred as a casual
or garden escape), Habenaria bifolia (the species recorded under this name
by the earlier Nottinghamshire botanists is H. chloroleuca, which was
1 For a list of these divisions see Watson, Top. Botany, ed. 2.
46
BOTANY
formerly not distinguished from bifolia), Scirpus jluitans, Carex fuha (?),
and Festuca arundinacea.
Of species with census numbers ranging from seventy to eighty
there are 101, and seventeen of these are unknown in Nottinghamshire.
Ten of the absentees, however, are plants that grow only by the sea, and
therefore could not occur with us. The others are : Utricularia minor
(recorded by Ordoyno, but not confirmed), Scutellaria minor ; Potamogeton
alpinus, Eleocbaris acicularis, Rbyncbospora alba, Pbegopteris Dryopteris, and
P. polypodioides,
The species occurring in from sixty to seventy counties or vice-
counties number ninety-seven. The most conspicuous absentees with us
are — besides a number of maritime and submontane plants — Sagina
subulata and S. ciliata, Hypericum e lodes, Sedum anglicum (?), Hieracium
murorum, Centunculus minimus, Carex laevigata, and Polys tic bum angular e (?).
There are ninety-five species with a census number between fifty
and sixty, and of these we necessarily lack the maritime species as well
as a few northern forms such as Geranium sylvaticum, Cnicus heterophyllus,
Cryptogramme crispa, Lycopodium alpinum, Selaginella, etc. In addition to
these we want the following : — Fumaria Boraei, Diplotaxis muralis (has
occurred as an alien), several Rubi, Rosa involuta, Cotyledon Umbilicus,
Drosera anglica and intermedia (Howitt's locality for D. intermedia is
almost certainly in Lincolnshire), Euphorbia amygdaloides (recorded by
Deering, perhaps erroneously, and certainly not found since), Listera
cordata, Potamogeton obtusifolius, Carex divulsa, C. axillaris, C. extensa, and
Pilularia globulifera.
Of the species found in fewer than fifty vice-counties so many are
wanting in Nottinghamshire that it will be sufficient to refer the reader
to the list of the plants of the county at the end of this article.
The vast majority of our wild plants naturally belong to the British
and English types of distribution, but there is a sprinkling of species
representing other types. Thus of Germanic species we have Myosurus
minimus,* Hippuris vu/garis, Galium erectum and G. tricorne, Lactuca uirosa,
Campanula glomerata, Monotropa Hypopitys, Limosella aquatica, Orchis
pyramidalis and O. ustulata* Allium oleraceum, Bromus erectus, Bracby-
podium pinnatum, Hordeum syhaticum, etc. Of Scottish type are, among
others, Viola lutea* Vicia syhatica, Parnassia palustris, Antennaria dioica*
Crepis paludosa* Campanula latifolia, Pyrola minor* Pinguicula vulgaris,
Salix pentandra, Empetrum nigrum, Melica nutans* Among species of
Intermediate type we have Poterium qfficinale, Gagea fascicularis, Crocus
nudijiorus, and Scbeucbzeria palustris* Plants of the Atlantic type are, as
might be expected, few in number, and, indeed, not a single species is
certainly known to occur now, at any rate as a native ; the recorded
species are Coronopus didymus, Erodium moschatum and E. maritimum, Sedum
anglicum, and Verbascum virgatum. Vaccinium Vitis-idaea is our only
Highland species, and we have no representative of the Local type.
* Species marked with an asterisk have not been seen in the county for many years and are
probably extinct.
47
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
BOTANICAL DISTRICTS
Nottinghamshire lies wholly within the drainage area of the Trent, so that the usual
division of a county into river basins for botanical purposes is not possible in our case. The
districts here adopted are therefore based on the geological structure of the county, and this
division is a really natural one, for with the exception of the alluvial tracts bordering the
Trent and its tributary streams very little drift occurs to obscure the older deposits, and con-
sequently the surface soil is principally formed by the disintegration and decay in situ of the
underlying rocks. The wide differences in the chemical composition of the resulting soils
have of course a marked influence on the character of the flora of each formation.
Leaving out of consideration the superficial (drift and alluvial) deposits, the formations
represented in Nottinghamshire are the Coal Measures, Permian, Trias (Bunter and Keuper),
Rhaetic, and Lower Lias. These form bands running partially or completely through the
county in a direction approximately north and south.
The outcrop of the Coal Measures forms a band 16 miles long between Stapleford in
the south and Teversall in the north, and varying in width from 2 to about 4 miles. To
the east it is succeeded by the Permian or Magnesian Limestone, which forms a narrow band
running from Nottingham to the county boundary on the north — a distance of about 32 miles.
At its maximum development it is about 4 miles in width, but for the most part is consider-
ably narrower. The sandstones and conglomerates of the Bunter, which follow, occupy a
much larger tract of land — nearly 40 miles long by 7 or 8 in width over the greater part
of its extent, except in the immediate neighbourhood of Nottingham, where it is much
narrower.
Quite half the area of the county is occupied by deposits of Keuper age, but as the
valley of the Trent lies almost wholly in this formation it is a good deal covered by alluvial
deposits. The Rhaetic shales form a band of insignificant extent along the eastern margin of
the Keuper.
Finally, on the eastern and south-eastern border of the county for the southern two-thirds
of its length the Keuper is succeeded by the lower beds of the Lias, which attain their
maximum development south of Cotgrave and Cropwell Bishop. Two rather extensive out-
liers occur to the west of the main mass of the Lias in the extreme south of the county.
The botanical districts adopted, four in number, are as follows : —
DISTRICT I
This comprises the area formed by the outcrops of the Coal Measures and Permian rocks
on the western side of the county. It might seem at first sight that two such apparently
dissimilar formations should constitute separate districts, but the area occupied by the Coal
Measures is so small and its noteworthy plants so few in number that to make of it a separate
district would be to ascribe to this formation an importance altogether out of proportion to its
merits. Indeed, the Coal Measures can scarcely claim to possess a distinctive flora at all : not
a single species appears to be confined to their outcrop, and the few conspicuous plants that
do occur are equally common elsewhere. On the other hand, the Magnesian Limestone
possesses a large number of characteristic species, some of which are peculiar to it. Among
these the following may be mentioned, the species hitherto found only on this formation being
indicated by an asterisk : —
'Ranunculus Lenormandi, F.
Schultz
"Helleborus viridis, L.
'Aquilegia vulgaris, L.
*Arabis hirsuta, Scop.
Reseda lutea, L.
Helianthemum Chamaecistus,
Mill.
Silene Cucubalus, Wib.
'Geranium sanguineum, L.
Trifolium medium, L.
Anthyllis Vulneraria, L.
Geum rivale, L.
Pamassia palustris, L.
*Ribes alpinum, L.
Hippuris vulgaris, L.
'Bupleurum rotundifolium, L.
Galium Mollugo, L.
Erigeron acre, L.
Inula Conyza, DC.
Centaurea Scabiosa, L.
Campanula Trachelium, L.
— latifolia, L.
Anagallis tenella, L.
Blackstonia perfoliata, Huds.
Gentiana Amarella, L.
* — baltica, Murb.
*Myosotis arvensis, Lam.,
var. umbrosa, Bab.
Lithospcrmum arvcnse, L.
48
Verbascum Thapsus, L.
'Linaria Elatina, Mill.
— viscida, Moench
Veronica montana, L.
Lathraea Squamaria, L.
Origanum vulgare, L.
Clinopodium Acinos, O. Kuntze
'Cephalanthera ensifblia, Rich.
* — pallens, Rich.
Epipactis palustris, Crantz
Orchis pyramidalis, L.
— ustulata, L.
*Ophrys muscifera, Huds.
Habenaria conopsea, Benth.
•Polygonatum multiflorum, All
BOTANY
Allium ursinum, L.
Gagea fascicularis, Salisb.
Paris quadrifolia, L.
'Potamogetoncoloratus, Hornem.
* Eleocharis multicaalis, Sm.
'Eriophorum latifblium, Hoppe
*Carex digitata, L.
— pendula, Huds.
— sylvatica, Huds.
* — vcsicaria, L.
*Avena pratensis, L.
'Melica nutans, L.
— uniflora, Retz.
'Hordeum sylvaticum, Huds.
Taxus baccata, L.
DISTRICT II
This consists of the Bunter or lower division of the Trias, and includes the fine-grained
red or variegated sands of the Lower Red and Mottled Sandstone, and the yellow or brownish
sands and conglomerates of the Bunter Pebble-beds.
The district possesses a distinctive and characteristic flora, although, as will be seen from
the list given below, only a few species are confined to it. This is due to the fact that most
sand-loving plants find an equally suitable habitat in the sandy patches which occasionally
occur in the Keuper Marl, in the tracts of sandy alluvium bordering the Trent in Division III,
and in the drift sands which cover a part of District IV on the eastern edge of the county.
The existing remains of the once far more extensive Sherwood Forest lie entirely in this
district, and consist chiefly of oak and birch timber with a dense undergrowth of bracken, and
open spaces covered with ling (Calluna), heath (Erica cinerea), bracken (Pteris), Deschampsia
fkxuosa, etc., and dotted with old thorn trees much infested with mistletoe.
A few bits of boggy ground are still to be found along the course of some of the streams,
as at Oxton and Rainworth, and to these we owe the survival of some of our most interesting
plants. Of late years, however, owing partly to a succession of dry seasons and partly to the
sinking of deep wells for the water supply of the surrounding towns, these bogs have become
nearly dry at times, with the result that such things as the sundew (Drosera), butterwort
(Pinguicula), cranberry (Schollera Oxycoccus), marsh fern (Lastrea Thelypteris), etc., are fast dis-
appearing or have already gone.
Among the characteristic species of the district are the following : —
'Capnoides claviculata, Druce
'Arabis perfoliata, Lam.
Teesdalia nudicaulis, R. Br.
Viola palustris, L.
— ericetorum, Schrad.
* — tricolor, L.
Polygala serpyllacea, Weihe
'Dianthus deltoides, L.
Silene anglica, L.
* — nutans, L.
Cerastium quaternellum, Fenzl.
— semidecandrum, L.
— arvense, L.
Sagina nodosa, Fenzl.
Alsine rubra, Crantz
'Montia fbntana, L.
Hypericum humifusum, L.
Erodium cicutarium, L'H6r.
Genista anglica, L.
•Ulex Gallii, Planch.
Trifolium subterraneum, L.
— arvense, L.
— striatum, L.
Ornithopus perpusillus, L.
'Vicia lathyroides, L.
Potentilla argentea, L.
— palustris, Scop.
Chrysosplenium al tern ifolium,L.
'Drosera rotundifolia, L.
'Callitriche truncata, GUSS.
'Epilobium adnatum, Griscb.
Galium saxatile, L.
Filago germanica, L.
— minima, Fr.
'Antennaria dioica, R. Br.
Gnaphalium sylvaticum, L.
Senecio sylvaticus, L.
*Arnoseris pusilla, Gaertn.
'Hieracium tridentatum, Fr.
— umbellatum, L.
Jasione montana, L.
*Vaccinium Vitis-idaea, L.
— Myrtillus, L.
'Schollera Oxycoccus, Rcth
Calluna Erica, DC.
Erica Tetralix, L.
— cinerea, L.
*Monotropa Hypopitys, L.
Lycopsis arvensis, L.
Myosotis collina, Hoffin.
— versicolor, Sm.
Echium vulgare, L.
Verbascum nigrum, L.
Digitalis purpurea, L.
Melampyrum pratense, L.
*Mentha alopecuroides, Hull.
Teucrium Scorodonia, L.
Plantago Coronopus, L.
Scleranthus annuus, L.
*Rumex limosus, Thuill.
— Acetosella, L.
'Empetrum nigrum, L.
Juncus squarrosus, L.
Juncoides multiflorum, Druce
*Scirpus maritimus, L.
*Carex teretiuscula, Good.
- paniculata, L.
* — curta, Good.
— leporina, L.
* — pilulifera, L.
*Apera Spica-venti, Beauv.
Aira caryophyllea, L.
Deschampsia flexuosa, Trin.
Molinia varia, Schrank
Nardus stricta, L.
Pteris aquilina, L.
Lastrea Thelypteris, Presl.
— Oreopteris, Presl.
— cristata, Presl.
— uliginosa, Newm.
Lycopodium Selago, L.
— inundatum, L.
— clavatum, L.
DISTRICT III
The Keuper deposits which underlie this extensive district are separable into two
divisions. The lower of these, known as the ' Waterstones,' consists of alternations of dull
» 49 7
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
red marl and light-coloured greenish-grey sandstone ; where the latter predominates the
resulting soil is sufficiently sandy to suit many of the plants characteristic of District II (e.g.,
Cerastium arvense, Cytisus scoparius, Saxifraga granulata, Artemisia vulgaris, Rumex Acetosella,
etc.), and we therefore find along the outcrop of the Lower Keuper an assemblage of species
transitional in character between the flora of the Bunter and that of the upper beds of the
Keuper. The upper division or Keuper Marl is a stiff bright-red clay with an occasional thin
band of hard whitish sandstone. The heavy somewhat calcareous clay soil supports a flora very
different from that of District II, but more nearly approximating to that of District I, with
which it has a large number of species in common. Among the more prominent plants that
occur with about equal frequency in Districts I and III, but are almost or entirely absent from
Districts II and IV, are Anemone nemorosa, Eutmymus europaeus, Pimpinella major, Asperula odorata,
Lactuca muralis, Campanula latifolia, Lysimachia nemorum, Erythraea Centaurium, Veronica
montana, Lamium Galeobdolon, Mercurialis perennis, Allium ursinum, Paris quadrifolia, Carex
pendula, C. sylvatica, Milium effusum and Melica uniflora. Several rare or uncommon
Nottinghamshire species are confined to District III ; of such are Ranunculus sardous and
R. parviflorus, Vlc'ia sylvatica, Lathyrus sylvestris, Caucalis nodosa, Dipsacus pilosus, Carduus
pycnocephalus and C. pratensis, Campanula patula, Myosotis sylvatica, Mentha Pulegium, Carex
pallescens (?), etc. ; while among commoner species which are most abundant in, but not abso-
lutely confined to, the district are Geranium pratense, Bidens tripartita, Chrysanthemum segetum,
Tanacetum vulgare, Picris hieracioides, Veronica Anagallis, Habenaria chloroleuca, Epipactis
latifolia, etc.
A number of plants which have their headquarters in the Trent valley — which lies
almost wholly in this district — owe their presence rather to their fondness for a moist or
watery situation than to the chemical or physical nature of the soil ; such are Thalictrum
ftivum, Nasturtium sylvestre and N. amphibium, Erysimum cheiranthoides, Stellaria aquatica,
Lythrum Salicaria, Apium graveolens, Oenanthe Phellandrium, Hottonia palustris, Symphytum
officinale, and Polygonum Hydropiper.
On the other hand the dry gravelly banks and terraces of old Trent alluvium offer a
congenial home for many of the sand-loving plants characteristic of District II.
A few species which are more or less common in District III are of equally frequent
occurrence in District IV, but almost or entirely unknown in Districts I and II. Among these
are Ononis spinosa, Conlum maculatum, Sison Amomum, Peucedanum sativum, Dipsacus sylvestris,
Senecio erucifolius, Picris echioides, Lactuca virosa, Hordeum secalinum.
The Rhaetic deposits which are included in District III form a narrow band of such
insignificant extent along the eastern edge of the Keuper as to be of no botanical importance,
and may therefore be ignored.
DISTRICT IV
The Liassic beds of Nottinghamshire consist of a series of blue clays and shales with
bands of limestone, belonging to the lower part of the Lower Lias, and forming a long strip
overlying the Triassic rocks along the south-eastern border of the county. There are also two
considerable outliers capping the hills south of the Trent between Thrumpton and West
Leake. Sison, Peucedanum sativum, Senecio erucifolius, and a few others are common plants in
this district, as mentioned above ; Cnicus eriophorus occurs in quantity in one or two stations,
and is apparently now confined to the district, although formerly found in others ; Solidago
Virgaurea, which formerly occurred in several places in the county, seems now restricted to
a single station on the Lias, where it is very rare ; and among other scarce species almost or
entirely confined to this formation are Lotus tenuis, Carum segetum, Caucalis arvensis, Galium
tricorne, Clinopodium Nepeta, Galeopsis Ladanum and Carex binervis.
In parts of District IV, as at Langford and Wigsley, the Lias clay is covered by a mantle
of gravelly drift supporting the usual assemblage of sand-loving plants, such as Teesdalia,
Cerastium semidecandrum and C. arvense, Polygala serpyllacea, Galium sylvestre, Filago minima,
Gnaphalium sylvaticum, Senecio sylvaticus, Calluna, Erica cinerea, Myosotis versicolor, Salix
repens, Nardus, etc. Langford Moor and Wigsley Wood were formerly wet swampy moor-
land, and although long drained and planted with oak and fir still show traces of their ancient
flora. Erica Tetralix, Lysimackia vulgaris, Myrica Gale, Molinia varia and Lastrea spinulosa
still persist in fair quantity, as well as patches of Sphagnum, and a solitary plant of Osmunda —
probably the last in the county — has only recently disappeared.
5°
BOTANY
LIST OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE VASCULAR PLANTS, WITH THEIR
DISTRIBUTION THROUGH THE BOTANICAL DISTRICTS
In the following summary of the flora of Nottinghamshire species to which no sign is
attached are to be regarded as ' wild ' in the sense of being natives, colonists, or denizens :
these number 854. Aliens and plants of recent introduction which maintain their ground
more or less successfully, so forming permanent constituents of our flora, are indicated by an
asterisk : of these there are seventy-two. Species of merely casual occurrence which are not
likely to permanently establish themselves, or which were probably recorded in error, or have
long been extinct are enclosed within square brackets : fifty-eight such are enumerated.1
DICOTYLEDONS
RANUNCULACEAE
[Clematis Vitalba, L.]
Thalictrum flavum, L. 1-4
Anemone nemorosa, L. 1-4
Myosurus minimus, L. I, 3, 4 (?)
Ranunculus circinatus, Sibth. I, 3
— fluitans, Lam. 3
— pseudo-fluitans, Bab. 2, 3
— trichophyllus, Chaix I
— Drouetii, Godr. I
— heterophyllus, Web. 3
— peltatus, Schrank 3
c. floribundus (Bab.) 3
— Lenormandi, F. Schultz I
— hedcraceus, L. 1-3
— sceleratus, L. 1—4
— Flammula, L. 1-4
— Lingua, L. z
— auricomus, L. 1—4
— acris, L. 1—4
— repens, L. 1—4
— bulbosus, L. 1-4
— sardous, Crantz 3
— parviflorus, L. 3
— arvensis, L. 1—4
— Ficaria, L. 1-4
Caltha palustris, L. 1-4
'Helleborus viridis, L. I
[ — fbetidus, L.] I
•Cammarum hyemale, Greene (Eranthis hyemalis,
Salisb.) 2, 3
Aquilegia vulgaris, L. 1
[Delphinium Ajacis, Gay] 2
BBRBERIDEAE
Berberis vulgaris, L. i, 3, 4
NYMPHAEACEAK
Nymphaea lutea, L. 1-3
Castalia speciosa, Salisb. 1-3
PAPAVERACEAH
[Papaver somniferum, L.] I (?), 2
— Rhoeas, L. 1-4
— dubium, L. a. Lamottei (Bor.) 1-4
b. Lecoqii (Lamotte). 3, 4
— Argemone, L. 2-4
'Glaucium phoeniceum, Crantz 3
[Roemeria violacea, Medic. (R. hybrida, DC.)] 3
Chelidonium majus, L. 1—4
FUMARIACEAE
*Capnoidessolida, Moench (Neckeria bulbosa,N.E.
Br.) i
[ — lutea, Gaert. (N. lutea, Scop.)] 3
— claviculata, Druce (N. claviculata, N.E. Br.) 2
Fumaria capreolata, L. 2
— muralis, Sond. (?) I
— officinalis, L. 1—4
CRUCIFERAE
Cheiranthus Cheiri, L. 1-3
Radicula officinalis, Groves (Nasturtium offici-
nale, R.Br.) 1-4
b. siifolia (Reichb.) 3
— pinnata, Moench (N. sylvestre, R. Br.) 2, 3
— palustris, Moench (N. palustre, DC.) 2, 3
— lancifolia, Moench (N. amphibium, R. Br.)
i-3
Barbarea vulgaris, R. Br. 1-4
Arabis hirsuta, Scop. I
— perfoliata, Lam. 2
Cardamine amara, L. 1-3
— pratensis, L. 1-4
— hirsuta, L. 1,2
— flexuosa, With. 1-3
[ — impatiens, L.] i
[Alyssum incanum, L.]
[ — alyssoides, L. (A. calycinum, L.)] 2
Erophila vulgaris, DC. 2—4
[Cochlearia officinalis, L.] i
[ — Armoracia, L.] 3
1 In the British Association Handbook issued at the Nottingham meeting in 1893 Mr. H. Fisher
records a considerable number of plants found growing on waste ground about the wharves, malt-kilns,
and grain-warehouses at Newark — evidently imported with grain from various foreign countries. Among
these, in addition to many of the aliens included in the 'list,' are Sisymbrium Columnae, All., Rafistrum
rugpsum, All., Euclydium syriacum, R. Br., Coriandum tordylioides, Boiss., Cnicus setosus, Bess., Centaurea
melitensis, L., Gilia capitate, Benth., Salvia lylvtstiis, L., Panicum miliaceum, L., and others, besides unidenti-
fied species of Adonis, Delphinium, Papaver, Eschscholtxia, Sisymbrium, Dianthus, Silene, Stellaria, Malva,
Medicags, Trifo/ium, Vicia, Lathyrus, Centaurea and other Compositae, Echium and several other Boragina-
ceous genera, Linaria, Veronica, Salvia, Atriplex, Euphorbia, Phleum, Bromus, Hordeum, etc. Many of
these will doubtless establish themselves and spread.
5'
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
CRUCI FERAE (continued)
"Hesperis matronalis, L. 3
Sisymbrium Thalianum, Gay 1—4
— officinale, Scop. 1-4
- Sophia, L. 2, 3
[ — pannonicum, Jacq.] 3
— Alliaria, Scop. 1—4
Erysimum cheiranthoides, L. 2, 3
* — perfolialum, Crantz 3
[Camelina saliva, Crantz] 3
Brassica Napus, L. 1,3
— Rapa, L. 2
b. sylvestris, H. C. Wats.
— Sinapioides, Roth 2, 3
— Sinapistrum, Boiss. 1—4
— alba, Boiss. 1,3
"Diplolaxis muralis, DC. 2
b. Babingtonii, Syme 2
Bursa pastoris, Weber 1-4
Senebiera pinnatifida, DC. (Coronopus didymus,
Sm.) i or 2
- coronopus, Poir. (C. Ruellii All.) 3
Lepidium campestre, R. Br. 1—3
- heterophyllum, Benth. (L. hirtum, Sm.) 4 (?)
* — Draba, L. 2, 3
Thlaspi arvense, L. 3
Teesdalia nudicaulis, R. Br. 2, 3
Raphanus Raphanistrum, L. 1—3
RESEDACEAE
[Reseda alba, L.] 2
- lutea, L. 1,3
- Luteola, L. 1-3
CISTINEAE
Helianthemum Chamaecistus, Mill. I,
3
VlOLARIEAE
Viola palustris, L. I, 2
— odorata, L. 1—4
/ alba (Lange). i, 3, 4
— permixta, Jord. (? odorata X hirta) I, 4
- hirta, L. 1-4
— silvestris, Reich. 1—3
- Riviniana, Reich. 1-4
— ericetorum, Schrad. 2, 4
— stagnina, Kit. 2 or 3
- tricolor, L. 2
- arvensis, Murr. 1—4
- lutea, Huds. (?) 2
PoLYGALEAK
Polygala vulgaris, L. 1,3
— oxyptera, Reich. I, 3
— serpyllacea, Wei he 2, 4
CARYOPHYLLEAK
Dianthus deltoides, L. 2
* — Caryophyllus, L. 2
'Saponaria Vaccaria, L. 3
- officinalis, L. I or 2, 3
Silene Cucubalus, Wibel 1—4
b. puberula, Syme i, 2
— anglica, L. 2, 4
CARYOPHYLLEAE (continued)
Silene nutans, L. 2
— noctiflora, L. I, 3, 4.
Lychnis alba, Mill. 1—4
— dioica, L. 1-4
— Flos-cuculi, L. 1—4
— Githago, Scop. 2—4
Cerastium quaternellum, Fenzl. z, 3 (?), 4 (?)
— semidecandrum, L. 2—4
— glomeratum, Thuill. 1-4
— triviale, Link 1-4
— arvense, L. 2, 3
Stellaria aquatica, Scop. 1-4
— media, Cyr. 1—4
c. major, Koch 3
— umbrosa, Opiz i, 3
— Holostea, L. 1-4
— palustris, Retz. 2-4
— graminea, L. 1-4
— uliginosa, Murr. 1-4
Arenaria trinervia, L. 1-4
— serpyllifolia, L. 1-4
c. leptoclados (Guss.)
Sagina apetala, L. 2, 3
— procumbens, L. 1—4
— nodosa, Fenzl. 1—3
Spergula arvensis, L. a. vulgaris (Boenn.) 1-4
b. saliva (Boenn.) 2
Alsine rnbra, Crantz (Buda rubra, Dum.) 2-4
PORTULACEAE
'Claytonia perfoliata, Donn 2
Montia fontana, L. 2
HYPERICINEAE
[Hypericum Androsaemum, L.] 2, 3
— perforalum, L. 1-4
— maculalum, Crantz (H. dubium, Leers) 3
— quadrangulum, L. (quadratum, Stokes) 1-4
— humifusum, L. 2—4
b. decumbens (Peterm.) 2
— pulchrum, L. 1-4
— hirsutum, L. 1—4
— monlanum, L. I, 3
MALVACEAE
Malva moschata, L. 1—3
— sylvestris, L. 1—4
— rotundifolia, L. 1-4
TILIACEAE
*Tilia plalyphyllos, Scop.
* — europaea, L. (T. vulgaris, Hayne)
— cordala, Mill. 1—3
LlNEAE
Radiola Linoides, Rolh 2, 4
Linum calharlicum, L. 1-4
[ — usitatissimum, L.]
GERANIACEAE
Geranium sanguineum, L. I
[ — phaeum, L.] i f
— praiense, L. 1—4
BOTANY
GERANIACEAE (continued)
Geranium pyrenaicum, Burra. fil. 3
— molle, L. 1-4
— pusillum, L. 2, 3
— dissectum, L. 1-4
— columbinum, L. 1—3
— lucidum, L. 2
— Robertianum, L. 1—4
Erodium cicutarium, L'Her.
a, vulgatum, Syme 1-4
b. chaerophyllum (Cav.) 2
— moschatum, L'Her. 2
— maritimum, L'Her. 2
Oxalis Acetosella, L. 1-3
ILICINEAE
Ilex Aquifolium, L. 1—4
CELASTRINEAE
Euonymus europaeus, L. 1-4
RHAMNEAE
Rhamnus catharticus, L. 1-4
— Frangula, L. i, 3, 4
SAPINDACEAE
'Acer Pseudo-platanus, L. 1-4
— campestre, L. 1-4
LECUMINOSAE
Genista anglica, L. I -4
— tinctoria, L. I, 3, 4
Ulex europaeus, L. 1—4
- Gallii, Planch. 2
— minor, Roth (U. nanus, Forst.) 2
Sarothamnus vulgaris, Wimm. (Cytisus scopa-
rius, Link). 1-4
Ononis repens, L. 1—4
- spinosa, L. 2—4
*Medicago sativa, L. 1—4
[ — falcata, L.] 3
— lupulina, L. 1-4
— arabica, Huds. 3, 4
Melilotus officinalis, Lam. I, 3, 4.
[ — alba, Desr.] 4
* — arvensis, Walk. 3
[ — indica, All.]
Trifolium subterraneum, L. 2, 3
— pratense, L. 1-4
— medium, L. 1-4
[ — ochroleucon, Huds.] 3
[ — incarnatum, L.] 3
— arvense, L. 2, 3
— striatum, L. 2, 3
[ — hybridum, L.] I, 2
[b. elegans (Savi)] 3
— repens, L. 1-4
— fragiferum, L. I, 3, 4
[ — resupinatum, L.] 3
— procumbens, L. 1—4
— dubium, Sibth. 1—4
- filiformc, L.
Anthyllis Vulneraria, L. 1—4
Lotus corniculatus, L. 1—4
— tcnuis, Wald. and Kit. I or 2, 4
LEGUMINOSAE (continued)
Lotus uliginosus, Schkuhr 1-4
Astragalus glycyphyllos, L. 2, 3
Ornithopus perpusillus, L. 2, 3
Hippocrepis comosa, L. (?) 2
Onobrychis viciaefolia, Scop, i
Vicia hirsuta, Gray 1-4
— gemella, Crantz 3, 4
var. tenuissima, Druce I
— Cracca, L. 1-4
— syJvatica, L. 3
— scpium, L. 1-4
* — sativa, L. 3.
— angustifolia, L. 2-4
— lathyroides, L. 2
[Lathyrus Aphaca, L.] 3
— Nissolia, L. 3 or 4
— pratensis, L. 1-4
— sylvestris, L. 3
— montanus, Bernh. \, 3, 4
ROSACEAE
Prunus spinosa, L. 1-4
— insititia, Huds. 2-4
[ — domestica, L.]
— Avium, L. 3, 4
— Cerasus, L. I ?
— Padus, L. 1-3
Spiraea Ulmaria, L. 1-4
— Filipendula, L. l, 3, 4
Rubus idaeus, L. 1-4
— suberectus, Anders. 2, 4
— Lindleianus, Lees 2, 3
— rhamnifolius, W. and N. 2
— pulcherrimus, Neum. 2, 4
— villicaulis, Koehl.
subsp. Selmeri (Lindeb.) 2
subsp. rhombifblius, Weihe 3
— gratus, Focke 3, 4
— rusticanus, Merc. 1—4
— pubescens, Weihe
— thyrsoideus, Wimm. 3
— macrophyllus, W. and N.
subsp. Schlechtendahlii (Weihe) 3
— leucostachys, Schleich. 1-3
— anglosaxonicus, Gelert 3
— radula, Weihe 2, 3
— echinatus, Lindl. 2, 3
— Koehleri, W. and N.
subsp. dasyphyllus, Rog. (pallidus, Bab.)
I, 2
— dumetorum, W. and N. 1-4
var. rubriflorus, Purch. I
var. concinnus, Warr. I
— corylifolius, Sm. 2
var. cyclophyllus, Lindeb. 3
— caesius, L. 1—4
Geum urban urn, L. 1—4
— rivale, L. I, 3
— „ X urbanum (intermedium, Ehrh.) 1,3
Fragaria vesca, L. 1-4
* — moschata, Duch. (elatior, Ehrh.) i
Potentilla Fragariastrum, Ehrh. 1-4
— silvestris, Neck. 1-4
— procumbens, Sibth. 2, 3
53
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
ROSACEAE (continued)
Potentilla reptans, L. 1—4
— Anserina, L. 1—4
— argentea, L. 2-4
— palustris, Scop. 2, 3
Alchemilla arvensis, Scop. 1-4
— vulgaris, L. 1-3
Agrimonia Eupatoria, L. 1-4
- odorata, Mill. 3
Poterium Sanguisorba, L. 1-4
— ofHcinale, Hook. fil. 1-4
Rosa spinosissima, L. 1—4
— involuta, Sm., var. Sabini (Woods) 4
— villosa, L. (mollis, Sm.) I
— tomentosa, Sm. 3
b. subglobosa (Sm.) I or 2, 4
d. scabriuscula (Sm.) 3
- Eglanteria, L. (rubiginosa, L.) 1-3
- micrantha, Sm. I, 3
- agrestis, Savi (sepium, Thuill.) 3
- obtusifolia, Desv.
c. tomentella (Leman) 3
d. Borreri (Woods)
- canina, L.
a. lutetiana (Leman) 1—3
„ f. andegavensis (Bast.) 3
c. sphaerica (Gren.) 3
e. dumalis (Bechst.) 1—3
„ / aspernata (Desegl.) 3
g. Blondaeana (Rip.) 3
i. urbica (Leman) i, 3
k. arvatica, Baker I or 2
— glauca, Vill. 3
e. coriifolia (Fr.) 3
— stylosa, Desv. 2
- arvensis, Huds. 1—4
Pyrus torminalis, Ehrh. 3
[— Aria, Ehrh.] 2
[ — domestica, Ehrh.]
— Aucuparia, Ehrh. 1—4
- communis, L. 3, 4
- Malus, L. 1-4
Crataegus Oxyacantha, L.
a. oxyacanthoides (Thuill.) 1-4
b. monogyna (Jacq.) 1-4
SAXIFRAGEAE
Saxifraga tridactylites, L. i, 3, 4
— granulata, L. 2-4
Chrysosplenium oppositifolium, L. 1-3
— alternifolium, L. 2, 3
Parnassia palustris, L. 1-3
Ribes Grossularia, L. 1—4
* — alpinum, L. i
— rubrum, L. 1—3
— nigrum, L. 2
CRASSULACEAB
Sedum Telephium, L. 1,2
[ — album, L.] 2
[ — dasyphyllum, L.] I
* — anglicum, Huds. I or 2
— acre, L. 1-3
* — reflexum, L. 2, 3
[b. albescens (Haw.)]
[Sempervivum tectorum, L.]
DROSERACEAE
Drosera rotundifolia, L. 2
[ — lungi folia, L. (intermedia, Hayne) 4 (:)]
HALORACEAE
Hippuris vulgaris, L. 1-3
Myriophyllum verticillatum, L. 2, 3
— spicatum, L. 1—4
— alterniflorum, DC. 3
Callitriche vernalis, Koch
— stagnalis, Scop. 1—3
— obtusangula, Le Gall 3
— autumnalis, L. (?)
— truncata, Guss. 2
LYTHRARIEAE
Peplis Portula, L. 2-4
Lythrum Salicaria, L. 1—4
[ — Hyssopifolia, L.]
ONAGRARIEAE
Epilobium angustifolium, L. 1—4
— hirsutum, L. 1—4
— parviflorum, Schreb. 1-4 •
— montanum, L. 1—4
— roseum, Schreb. 1—3
— adnatum, Griseb. 2
— obscurum, Schreb. 1—3
— palustre, L. 2, 3
Circaea lutetiana, L. I, 3, 4
CUCURBITACEAE
Bryonia dioica, Jacq. 1—4
UMBELLIFERAE
Hydrocotyle vulgaris. L. 1—4
Sanicula europaea, L. 1-4
Conium maculatum, L. 1—4
*Smyrnium Olusatrum, L. 2
Bupleurum rotundifolium, L. I
Apium graveolens, L. 3
— nodiflorum, Reich, fil. 1—4
c. ocreatum, Bab. 2
— inundatum, Reich, f. 1-3
Cicuta virosa, L. 2
*Carum Petroselinum, Benth. and Hook. 2
— segetum, Benth. and Hook. 4
* — Carvi, L. 1,3
Sison Amomum, L. 3, 4
Sium latifolium, L. 2, 3
— erectum, Huds. 1-4
./Egopodium Podagraria, L. 1-4
Pimpinella Saxifraga, L. 1—4
c. dissecta, With.
— major, Huds. I, 3, 4
Conopodium denudatum, Koch 1—4
Myrrhis Odorata, Scop. 2
Chaerophyllum temulum, L. 1—4
Scandix Pecten, L. I, 3, 4
Anthriscus vulgaris, Bernh. 2, 3
— sylvestris, Hoffm. 1-4
* — Cerefolium, Hoffin. i, 3
*Foeniculum vulgare, Mill. 2
Oenanthe fistulosa, L. 1-4
54
BOTANY
UMBELLIFERAE (continued')
Oenanthepeucedanifblia,Poll.(silaifblia, Bieb.)
— Lachenalii, Gmel. 1—4
— Phellandrium, Lam. I (?), 2—4
Aethusa Cynapium, L. 1—4
Silaus flavescens, Bernh. I, 3, 4
Angelica sylvestris, L. 1—4
*Archangelica officinalis, HofFm. 3
Peucedanum palustre, Moench (?) I
— sativum, Benth. and Hook. I, 3, 4
Heracleum Sphondylium, L. 1—4
b. angustifolium, Huds. 1,3
Daucus Carota, L. 1—4
"Caucalis latitblia, L. 3
* — daucoides, L. 3
— arvensis, Huds. 3, 4
— Anthriscus, Huds. 1—4
— nodosa, Scop. 3
ARALIACEAE
Hedera Helix, L. 1-4
CORNACEAE
Cornus sanguinea, L. 1—4
CAPRIFOLIACEAE
Adoxa Moschatellina, L. 1-3
Sambucus nigra, L. 1—4
b. laciniata, L. 2
— Ebulus, L. 1-3
Viburnum Opulus, L. 1-4
— Lantana, L. 2, 3
Lonicera Periclymenum, L. 1-4
RUBIACEAE
Galium Cruciata, Scop. 1-4
— verum, L. 1—4
— erectum, Huds. 4
— Mollugo, L. 1—4
— saxatile, L. 1-4
* — umbellatum, Lam. (sylvestre, Poll.)
— palustre, L. 2-4
b. elongatum (Presl.)
c. Witheringii (Sm.) 2
i — uliginosum, L. 1—4
— Aparine, L. 1—4
— tricorne, Stokes 4
Asperula odorata, L. 1—3
• — arvensis, L. 3
Sherardia arvensis, L. 1-4
VALERIANEAE
Valerians dioica, L. 1-4
— Mikanii, Syme 3
— sambucifolia, Willd. 1-4
Valerianella olitoria, Poll. 1-4
* — eriocarpa, Desv. 3
— dentata, Poll. 1-4
DlPSACEAE
Dipsacus sylvestris, Huds.
— pilosus, L. 1,3
Scabiosa Succisa, L. 1-4
— Columbaria, L. 1-4
— arvensis, L. 1—4
1-4
CoMPOSITAE
Eupatorium cannabinum, L. 1—4
Solidago Virgaurea, L. I (?), 2, 4
Bellis perennis, L. 1—4
'Aster Tripolium, L. 2
Erigeron acre, L. 1,2
Filago germanica, L. 1—4
— minima, Fr. 2, 3, 4
Antennaria dioica, R. Br. 2
Gnaphalium uliginosum, L. 1-4
— sylvaticum, L. 2, 4
*Inula Helenium, L. 3
— Conyza, DC. i
Pulicaria dysenterica, Gaertn. 1—4
Bidens cernua, L. 2, 3
— tripartita, L. 1—3
Achillea Millefolium, L. 1-4
— Ptarmica, L. 1-4
[Anthemis tinctoria, L.] 3
— Cotula, L. 1-4
— arvensis, L. 2, 3
— nobilis, L. 1,2
Chrysanthemum segetum, L. 2-4
— Leucanthemum, L. 1-4
* — Parthenium, Pers. 1-3
Matricaria inodora, L. 1-4
— Chamomilla, L. 1-4
Tanacetum vulgare, L. 1-4
Artemisia Absinthium, L. 1-3
— vulgaris, L. 1-4
Tussilago Farfara, L. 1-4
Petasites officinalis, Moench 1-3
*Doronicum Pardalianches, L. 2
Senecio vulgaris, L. 1-4
— sylvaticus, L. 1-4
— viscosus, L. (?) 2 (?)
— erucifolius, L. i, 3, 4
— Jacobaea, L. 1-4
b. discoideus, Koch (flosculosus (Jord.) ) 3
— aquaticus, Huds. 1-4
* — saracenicus, L. i
Carlina vulgaris, L. I, 2, 4
Arctium majus, Bernh. 1-4
— minus, Bernh. 1—4
Carduus pycnocephalus, L. (tenuiflorus, Curt.) 3
— nutans, L. 1-4
— crispus, L. 1—4
c. acanthoides (L.)
Cnicus lanceolatus, Willd. 1-4
— eriophorus, Roth i, 3, 4
— palustris, Willd. 1-4
— pratensis, Willd. 3
— acaulis, Willd. 1-4
— arvensis, HofFm. 1-4
Onopordon Acanthium, L. 2, 3
•Mariana lactea, Hill 2, 3
Serratula tinctoria, L. I, 3, 4
Centaurea nigra, L. 1-4
— Scabiosa, L. 1-4
— Cyanus, L. 1-4
[ — solstitialis, L.] 3
Cichorium Intybus, L. 2—4
Arnoseris pusilla, Gaertn. 2
Lapsana communis, L. 1—4
Picris hieracioides, L. I, 3, 4
55
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
COMPOSITAE (continued)
Picris echioides, L. 3, 4
'Crepis taraxacifolia, Thuill. 4
[ — setosa, Hall] 3
— virens, L. 1-4
— biennis, L. 3
— paludosa, Moench I or 2
Hieracium Pilosella, L. 1-4
— vulgatum, Fr. 1-4
— sciaphilum, Uechtr. 1—3
— rigidum, Hartm., var. tridentatum (Fr.) 2
— boreal e, Fr. 1—4
— umbellatum, L. 2-4
Hypochaeris glabra, L. 2, 3
- radicata, L. 1-4
Leontodon hirtus, L. 1—4
— hispidus, L. 1-4
— autumnalis, L. 1—4
Taraxacum officinale, Web. 1-4
b. erythrospermum (Andrz.)
c. palustre (DC.). I or 2
Lactuca virosa, L. 2-4
[- saligna, L.] (?) 3
- muralis, Fresen. 1—3
Sonchus oleraceus, L. 1-4
- asper, Hoffm. 1-4
— arvensis, L. 1-4
Tragopogon pratense, L. 3
b. minus (Mill.) 1-4
CAMPANULACEAE
Jasione montana, L. 2, 3
Campanula glomerata, L. 1,3
— Trachelium, L. 1,4
- latifolia, L. i, 3, 4
- rapunculoides, L.
- rotundifolia, L. 1—4
* — Rapunculus, L. 4
— patula, L. 3
VACCINIACEAB
Vaccinium Vitis-idaea, L. 2
- Myrtillus, L. 2-4
Schollera Oxycoccus, Roth 2
ERICACEAE
Calluna Erica, DC. 2-4
b. pubescens, Koch 2
Erica Tetralix, L. 2, 4
- cinerea, L. 2, 4
Pyrola minor, L. I or 2
MONOTROPEAE
Monotropa Hypopitys, L. (Hypopitys Mono-
tropa, Crantz) 2
PRIMULACEAE
Hottonia palustris, L. 2-4
Primula acaulis, L. 1—4
X veris. i, 3
— veris, L. 1—4
•Cyclamen hederaefolium, Ait. 3 or 4
Lysimachia thyrsiflora, L. (?)
PRIMULACEAE (continued)
Lysimachia vulgaris, L. 2—4
— Nummularia, L. 1-4
— nemorum, L. 1—4
Anagallis arvensis, L. 1-4
— caerulea, Schreb. 3
— tenella, L. 1-4
Samolus Valerandi, L. 1—4
OLEACEAE
Fraxinus excelsior, L. 1—4
Ligustrum vulgare, L. 1—4
APOCYNACEAB
*Vinca major, L. i, 3
— minor, L. 3, 4
GENTIANEAE
Blackstonia perfoliata, Huds. I, 3, 4
Erythraea Centaurium, Pers. 1-4
Gentiana Pneumonanthe, L. 3, 4
— Amarella, L. i, 3, 4
— campestris, L. 2 (?), 3
— baltica, Murb. i
Menyanthes trifoliata, L. 1-3
"Limnanthemum peltatum, Gmel. *
BORAGINEAE
Cynoglossum officinale, L. 1—4
* — montanum, L. (germanicum, Jacq.) (?) 2
'Asperugo procumbens, L. 3
Symphytum officinale, L. 3
*Borago officinalis, L. 1-3
*Anchusa sempervirens, L. 1-3
Lycopsis arvensis, L. 2, 3
Myosotis caespitosa, Schultz 1-4
— scorpioides, L. (palustris, Relh.) 1-4
b. strigulosa (Reich.) 3
— repens, G. Don 2, 3
— sylvatica, HofFm. 3
— arvensis, Lam. 1—4
b. umbrosa, Bab. i
— collina, HofFm. 2, 3
— versicolor, Sm. 2, 4
Lithospermum officinale, L. 1-3
— arvense, L. i, 3
Echium vulgare, L. i, 2
CONVOLVULACEAE
Volvulus sepium, Jung. 1-4
Convolvulus arvensis, L. 1-4
Cuscuta Epithymum, Murr. 3
*— Trifolii, Bab. 3
SoLANACEAE
Solanum Dulcamara, L. 1-4
— nigrum, L. 2, 3
[Lycium chinense, Mill, (barbarum, L.)] 1-3
Atropa Belladonna, L. 1-3
[Datura Stramonium, L.] 3
Hyoscyamus niger, L. 2, 3
BOTANY
SCROPHULARINAB
Verbascum Thapsus, L. 1-3
* — pulverulentum, L. I, 2
[ — Lychnitis, L.] 3
— nigrum, L. 1,2
— virgatum, Stokes (?). 2
'Linaria Cymbalaria, Mill. 1,3
— Elatina, Mill. I
— spuria, Mill. 3, 4
— vulgaris, Mill. 1-4
— viscida, Moench 1,3
'Antirrhinum majus, L. 3
* — Orontium, L. 3
Scrophularia aquatica, L. 1-4
— nodosa, L. 1—4
'Mimulus Langsdorffii, Donn (luteus, L.) 1,2
Limosella aquatica, L. 3
Digitalis purpurea, L. 1—3
Veronica hederaefolia, L. 1-4
— didyma, Ten. (polita, Fr.). 1—3
— agrestis, L. 1—3
— Tournefbrtii, C. Gmel. 1—4
— triphyllos, L. (?) 2
— arvensis, L. 1-4
— serpyllifblia, L. 1—4
— officinalis, L. 1-4
— Chamaedrys, L. 1-4
— montana, L. 1,3
— scutellata, L. 1—4
— Anagallis, L. 1—4
— Beccabunga, L. 1-4
Euphrasia officinalis, L. 1-4
Bartsia Odontites, Huds. 1-4
Pedicularis palustris, L. 2, 3
— sylvatica, L. 1-4
Rhinanthus Crista-galli, L. 1-4
— major, Ehrh., b. stenoptera, Fr. 4
Melampyrum pratense, L. 2—4
OROBANCHACEAE
Orobanche major, L. 2, 3
— rubra, Sm. (?) 2
— minor, Sm. 3, 4
Lathraea Squamaria, L. 1-3
LENTIBULARIEAE
Utricularia vulgaris, L. 2, 3
— minor, L. (?) 3
Pinguicula vulgaris, L. 1-3
VERBENACEAE
Verbena officinalis, L. 2, 3
LABIATAE
Mentha rotundifolia, Huds. I
— alopecuroides, Hull. 2
— longi folia, Huds. 1—3
— piperita, L. 1-3
— hirsuta, Huds. 1—4
3. subglabra (Baker). 1,2
- sativa, L. I, 3, 4
— rubra, Sm. 2, 3
— arvensis, L. I, 3, 4
var. Nummularia (Schreb.) 1,4
— Pulegium, L. 3
LABIATAE (continued')
Lycopus europaeus, L. 1—4
Origanum vulgare, L. I, 3, 4
Thymus serpyllum, Fr. 1—3
Clinopodium vulgare, L. (Calamintha Clinopo-
dium, Benth.) 1—4
— Acinos, O.Kuntze (Cal. arvensis, Lam.) I, z.
— Nepeta,O. Kuntze(Cal. parviflora, Lam.)(?) 4
— Calamintha, O. Kuntze (Cal. officinalis,
Moench) 2, 3
Salvia Verbenaca, L. 2, 3
Nepeta Cataria, L. 1—4
— Glechoma, Benth. 1-4
b. parviflora, Benth. 2
Scutellaria galericulata, L. 1-4
Prunella vulgaris, L. 1-4
Marrubium vulgare, L.
Stachys Betonica, Benth.
— palustris, L. 1-3
— sylvatica, L. 1—4
— arvensis, L. I, 3, 4
Galeopsis Ladanum, L.
— ochroleuca, Lam. : ,
— speciosa, Mill, (versicolor, Curt.)
- Tetrahit, L. 1-4
*Leonurus Cardiaca, L. I
Lamium amplexicaule, L.
— hybridum, Vill. 3
— purpureum, L. 1-4
— album, L. 1-4
— Galeobdolon, Crantz
Ballota nigra, L. 1-4
Teucrium Scorodonia, L.
Ajuga reptans, L. 1-4
I. 2.
4
2,4
2-4 (?)
i, 2,4
PLANTAGINEAE
Plantago major, L. 1-4
— media, L. 1—4
— lanceolata, L. 1—4
— Coronopus, L. 2, 3
Littorella juncea, Berg. I, 2
ILLECEBRACEAE
[Herniaria hirsuta, L.]. 3
Scleranthus annuus, L. 2—4
b. biennis (Reuter) 2
[ — perennis, L.] 3
AMARANTHACEAE
[Amaranthus retroflexus, L.] 3
[ — Blitum, L.] 3
CHENOPODIACEAE
Chenopodium polyspermum, L. 1,3
— Vulvaria, L. 2, 3
— album, L. 1-4
b. viride (L.). 2, 3
c. viridescens, St. Am. (C. paganum,
Reich.) 2, 3
* — opulifolium, Schrad. 3
- murale, L. 2, 3
* — hybridum, L. 3
* — urbicum, L. 3
— rubrum, L. 2-4
— Bonus-Henricus, L. 1-3
57
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
CHENOPODIACEAE (continued)
[Beta maritima, L.] (?)
[Atriplex littoralis, L.]. 3
— patula, L. 1-4
b. erecta, Huds. 1,2
f. angustifolia (Sm.)- 2, 3-
— hastata, Huds. (Smithii, Syme) i, 3
— deltoidea, Bab. 3
PoLYGONACEAE
Polygonum Convolvulus, L. 1—4
b. subalatum, V. Hall, i, 3
— aviculare, L. 1—4
a. agrestinum (Jord.) 3
b. vulgatum, Syme 2, 3
e. rurivagum (Jord.) 3
/ littorale (Link) 3
— Hydropiper, L. 1—3
— minus, Huds. 2 (?), 3
— mite, Schrank 3
— Persicaria, L. 1—4
- lapathifolium, L. 2—4
— amphibium, L. 1—4
b. terrestre, Leers 1-4
— Bistorta, L. i, 2
[Fagopyrum sagittatum, Gilib. (esculentum,
Moench)] I, 2
Rumex conglomerate, Murr. 1-4
— sanguineus, L. i (?), 3
b. viridis (Sibth.). 1-4
— maritimus, L. 2 (?), 3
— limosus, Thuill. 2, 3 (?)
— pulcher, L. 2
— obtusifolius, L. 1-4
- crispus, L. 1-4
— acutus, L. (crispus X obtusifolius)
- domesticus, Hartm. (?)
- Hydrolapathum, Huds. 1-4
— Acetosa, L. 1—4
— Acetosella, L. 1-4
THYMEL/EACEAB
Daphne Laureola, L. i, 3, 4
LORANTHACEAE
Viscum album, L. 2, 3
EUPHORBIACEAE
Euphorbia Helioscopia, L. 1-4
[ — amygdaloides, L.] (?) 3
— Peplus, L. 1-4
— exigua, L. 1—4
— Lathyris, L. (?)
Mercurialis perennis, L. 1—4
— annua, L. 3
URTICACEAE
Ulmus glabra, Huds. (montana, Stokes) I,
— campestris, L. (surculosa, Stokes) 3
a. suberosa, Koch 3
b. glabra (Sm.) 2
Humulus Lupulus, L. 1—4
Urtica dioica, L 1—4
— urens, L. 1-4
Parietaria ramiflora, Moench (officinalis, L.)
3,4
MYRICACEAE
Myrica Gale, L. 4
CUPULIFERAE
Betula verrucosa Ehrh. i, 2
— pubescens, Ehrh. 2, 4
Alnus glutinosa, Medic. 1—4
'Carpinns Betulus, L. 2
Corylus Avellana, L. 1—4
Quercus Robur, L. 1-4
a. pedunculata (Ehrh.) 2, 3
b. intermedia (D. Don) 3
c. sessiliflora (Salisb.) 2—4
*Castanea sativa, Mill. 2, 4
Fagus sylvatica, L. 1-4
SALICINEAE
Salix triandra, L. 3
— triandra X fragilis (decipiens, Hoffm.) 2 or 3
— triandra X viminalis (hippophaefolia, Wim.
and Grab.) 3
— triandra X alba (undulata, Ehrh.) 3
— pentandra, L. 2
— fragilis, L. 2, 3
— alba, L. 3
b. vitellina, L. 3
— alba X fragilis (viridis, Fr.)
— purpurea, L. 3
f. Lambertiana (Sm.). 2
— purpurea X viminalis (rubra, Huds.) 3
„ „ f. Forbyana (Sm.) 3
— viminalis, L. 3
X Caprea (Smithiana, Willd.) (?)
var. acuminata (Sm.) 2, 3
— Caprea, L. 1-4
— aurita, L. 1—3
— cinerea, L. 1-4
b. aquatica (Sm.) (?) 2
— repens, L. 2-4
Populus alba, L. 3
— canescens, Sm.
— tremula, L. i, 3
*— nigra, 1-4
EMPETRACEAE
Empetrum nigrum, L. 2
CERATOPHYLLEAE
Ceratophyllum demersum, L. 2 (?), 3
MONOCOTYLEDONS
HYDROCHARIDEAE
Elodea canadensis, Michx. 1—4
Hydrocharis Morsus-ranae, L. 2, 3
Stsatiotes Aloides, L. i, 3 (?)
ORCHIDEAE
Neottia Nidus-avis, Rich, i, 3
Listera ovata, R. Br. 1—4
Spiranthes autumnalis, Rich. 3
Cephalanthera ensifolia, Rich. I
— pallens, Rich, i
Epipactis latifolia, All. i, 3
— palustris, Crantz 1-4
BOTANY
ORCHIDEAE (continued)
Orchis pyramidalis, L. I, 3
— ustulata, L. I, 3 (?)
— Morio, L. 1—4
— mascula, L. i, 3, 4
— incarnata, L. 1-3
— latifolia, L. (?) 3
— maculata, L. 1—4
Ophrys apifera, Huds. 1,3,4
- muscifera, Huds. I
Habenaria conopsea, Benth. I, 3
— viridis, R. Br. i, 3
— chloroleuca, Ridley 3
IRIDEAE
Iris Pseudacorus, L. 1-4
b. acoriformis (Bor.) 2, 3 (?)
Crocus vernus, All. 2, 3
— nudillorus, Sm. 2, 3
AMARYLLIDEAE
•Narcissus Pseudo-narcissus, L. 2, 3
'Galanthus nivalis, L. 1-3
DIOSCOREAE
Tamus communis, L. 1-4
LlLIACEAE
[Ruscus aculeatus, L.]
Polygonatum multiflorum, All. i
* — officinale, All. i or 2
Convallaria maialis, L. 2
Allium vineale, L. 2, 3
c. compactum (Thuill.). 3
— oleraceum, L. I, 2
[ — carinatum, L.] (?) 3 (?)
— - ursinum, L. 1—3
Scilla festalis, Salisb. 1-4
"Ornithogalum nutans, L. 2 or 3
— umbellatum, L. 1,2
Tulipa sylvestris, L. 3
Gagea fascicularis, Salisb. I, 3
Colchicum autumnale, L. I or 2, 3
[Narthecium ossifragum, Huds. (?)]. 4
Paris quadrifolia, L. 1,3.
JUNCACEAE
Juncus bufonius, L. 1—3
— squarrosus, L. 2, 4
— compressus, Jacq. 1—3
— inflexus, L. (glaucus, Leers) 1-4
— effusus, L. 1—3
— conglomerate, L. 1-4
— bulbosus, L. (supinus, Moench) 2
— obtusiflorus, Ehrh. 1-3
— articulatus, L. (lamprocarpus, Ehrh.) 1-3
— acutiflorus, Ehrh. 1—3
Juncoides pilosum, O. Kuntze (Luzula vernalis,
DC.) 1,3
— sylvaticum, O. Kuntze (L. maxima, DC.)
i, 3
— campestre, O. Kuntze (L. campestris, DC.)
1-4
— multiflorum, Druce (L. erecta, Desv.) 2-4
b. congesta (L. congesta, Lej.) 2
TYPHACEAE
Typha latifolia, L. 1-4
— angustifolia, L. i, 2(?), 3
Sparganium erectum, L. (ramosum, Huds.) 1-4
— simplex, Huds. 1—4
— minimum, Fr. i, 2
AROIDEAE
Arum macula turn, L. 1—4
Acorus Calamus, L. 1—3
LEMNACEAB
Lemna trisulca, L. 1—3
— minor, L. 1—4
— gibba, L. 2, 3
— polyrrhiza, L. 2, 3
ALISMACEAE
Alisma Plantago, L. 1—4
— ranunculoides, L. 1—3
Sagittaria sagittifolia, L. 1—4
Butomus umbellatus, L. 1-4
NAIADACEAE
Triglochin palustre, L. 1-3
Scheuchzeria palustris, L. 2 or 3
Potamogeton natans, L. 1-4
— coloratus, Hornem. i
— heterophyllus, Schreb. 2
- falcatus, Fryer 2
- lucens, L. 1,3
— praelongus, Wulf. 2, 3
- perfoliatus, L. 1-4
- crispus, L. 1-3
- Cooperi, Fryer 3
— densus, L. 1,2
— zosteraefolius, Schum. 1-4
— Friesii, Rupr. i, 3
— pusillus, L. 1—3
- pectinatus, L. 1-3
- flabellatus, Bab. (interruptus, Kit.) 1-3
Zannichellia palustris, L. 1,3
CYPERACEAE
Eleocharis palustris, R. Br. 1-4
— multicaulis, Sm. I
Scirpus caespitosus, L.
— setaceus, L. 2, 3
— lacustris, L. 1-3
— Tabernameontani, Gmel. I -3
— maritimus, L. 2
— sylvaticus, L. 1—3
- Caricis, Retz. 1-3
Eriophorum vaginatum, L. 2
— angustifolium, Roth 2, 3
— latifolium, Hoppe I
Schoenus nigricans, L. 1,2
Carex dioica, L. 1,2
— pulicaris, L. 1,3
— disticha, Huds. 3
— teretiuscula, Good. 2
— paniculata, L. i, 2
— vulpina, L. 1-4
— muricata, L. 1—4
[ — divulsa, Good.] 2 or 3 (?)
— echinata, Murr. 2, 3
59
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
CVPERACKAE (continued')
Carex remote, L. 1-4
— curta, Good. 2
— leporina, L. (ovalis, Good.) 2—4
— data, All. (Hudsonii, A. Benn. ; stricta, Good.)
— acuta, L. 3
var. gracilescens, Almq. 3
— Goodenovii, J. Gay 2, 3
- flacca, Schreb. 1-4
- digitata, L. I
— pilulifcra, L. 2
- verna, Chaix i, 3
— pallescens, L. 3
— panicea, L. 1—3
— pendula, Huds. I, 3
- sylvatica, Huds. I, 3, 4
- binervis, Sm. 4
- distans, L. 2, 3
- fulva, Good. (?) I
- flava, L. 1-3
var. Oederi, Retz.
- hirta, L. 1-3
- Pseudo-cyperus, L. 1-4
- acutiformis, Ehrh. 1-4
var. Kochiana, Gaud. I
- riparia, Curt. 2, 3
- rostrata, Stokes 1—3
- vesicaria, L. I
GRAMINEAE
[P.micum Crus-galli, L.] 3
[Setaria viridis, Beauv.] 3
[ — glauca, Beauv.] 3
[Phalaris canariensis, L.] 1-3
- arundinacea, L. 1—4
Anthoxanthum odoratum, L. 1-4
Alopecurus myosuroides, Huds. 3
- geniculatus, L. 1—4
- pratensis, L. 1—4
Milium effusum, L. 1,3
Phleum pra tense, L. 1—4
Agrostis canina, L. 3
- palustris, Huds. I, 3
— vulgaris, With. 2, 3
var. nigra (With.) I
Calamagrostis epigeios, Roth I, 3
- lanceolata, Roth I, 3
Apera Spica-venti, Beauv. 2
— interrupta, Beauv. 3
Aira caryophyllea, L. 2, 3
— praecox, L. 2, 3
[Weingaertneria canescens, Bernh.]
Deschampsia caespitosa, Beauv. 1—4
— flexuosa, Trin. 1-4
Holcus moll is, L. 1—4
— lanatus, L. 1—4
Trisetum pratense, Pers. 1-4
Avena pubescens, Huda. I, 3, 4
— pratensis, L. I
* — strigosa, Schreb. 3 or 4
* — fatua, L. 3
Arrhenatherum avenaceum, Beauv. 1—4
Sieglingia decumbens, Bernh. 1,3
Phragmites communis, Trin. 2-4
Cynosurus cr is tat us, L. 1—4
Koeleria cristata, Pers. 1-3
60
GRAMINEAE (continued)
Molinia varia, Schrank I, 2, 4
Catabrosa aquatica, Beauv. 1-3
Melica montana, Huds. (nutans, Lon. Cat., ed.
ix) i
— nutans, L. (uniflora, Retz.) i, 3
Dactylis glomerata, L. 1-4
Briza media, L. 1—4
Poa annua, L. 1-4
— nemoralis, L. I, 3
— compressa, L. i, 3
— pratensis, L. 1-3
var. strigosa (Gaud.) 3
— trivialis, L. i, 3
Glyceria fluitans, R. Br. 1-3
— plicata, Fr. 3
— aquatica, Sm. 1—4
— distans, Wahl. I, 3
Festuca rigida, Kunth i, 2
— Myuros, L. 3
— sciuroides, Roth 2, 3
— ovina, L. 1—3
— rubra, L. 3
var. fallax, Thuill. i
— elatior, L. 1—3
var. pratensis, Huds. i, 3
X Lolium perenne (F. loliacea, Huds.) 3
Bromus giganteus, L. 1-3.
— ramosus, Huds. i, 3, 4
— erectus, Huds. I, 3
[ — tectorum, L.]. 3
- sterilis, L. 1—3
— secalinus, L. 3, 4
— racemosus, L. 3
- commutatus, Schrad. 3
— mollis, L. 1—4
- arvensis, L. 3
Brachypodium gracile, Beauv. i, 3, 4
— pinnatum, Beauv. I, 3, 4
Lolium perenne, L. 1—4
*var. italicum (Braun) 2, 3
— temulentum, L. 3
Agropyron caninum, Beauv. 1—3
— repens, Beauv. 1—4
Nardus stricta, L. 2, 4
Hordeum sylvaticum, Huds. i
— nodosum, L. (H. secalinum, Schreb., H. pra-
tense, Huds.) I, 3, 4
— murinum, L. 1-4
GYMNOSPERMAE
CONIFERAE
Juniperus communis, L. 3 (?)
Taxus baccata, L. 1—4
*Pinus sylvestris, L. 2
PTERIDOPHYTA
FlLICES
Pteris aquilina, L. 1-4
Blechnum spicant, With. (Lomaria Spicant,
Desv.) 2-4
Asplenium Adiantum-nigrum, L. 1—3
— Trichomanes, L. 1-3
— Ruta-muraria, L. 1-3
BOTANY
FILICES (continued?)
Athyrium Filix-foemina, Roth 1—4
Ceterach officinarum, Willd. 3
Phyllitis Scolopendrium, Greene (Scolopendrium
vulgare, Symons) 1—3
Cystopteris fragilis, Bernh. i, z
Polystichum lobatum, Presl. 1—3
b. aculeatum, Syme 1-4
— angulare, Presl.
Lastrea Thelypteris, Presl. 2
— Oreopteris, Presl. z
— Filix-mas, Presl. 1—4
b. affinis, Bab.
— cr is tat a, Presl. z
— uliginosa, Newm. z
— spinulosa, Presl. 1—4
— dilatata, Presl. 1-4
b. tanacetifolia, Moore I
f. dumetorum, Moore I (?), 2
d. collina, Bab. i, 4
FILICES (continued')
Polypodium vulgare, L. 1-4
Osmunda regalis, L. i (?)— 4
Ophioglossum vulgatum, L. i, 3, 4
Botrychium Lunaria, Sw. 1-3
EQUISETACEAE
Equisetum maximum, Lam. 1—3
— arvense, L. 1—4
— sylvaticum, L. 3
— palustre, L. 1—3
— limosum, L. 3
b. fluviatile, L. 2
— hyemale, L. i, 3
LYCOPODIACEAE
Lycopodium Selago, L. z
— inundatum, L. z
— clavatum, L. z
MOSSES
The earliest references to the mosses of Nottinghamshire occur in
the second edition of Ray's Synopsis, published in 1696. In this work
Ray describes for the first time as British species Aulacomnium androgynum
and Encalypta vulgaris, which had been sent to him by ' Mr. Pool, a
mercer in Nottingham,' and ' a diligent enquirer into Natural History.'
Practically, however, the foundations of our knowledge of the moss flora
of the county were laid by Deering, whose Catalogus Stirpium, etc.,
published in 1738, contains references to forty-three identifiable species.
Nearly all of these still occur, but two of them, Ptycbomitrium polyphyllum
and Ginclidotus fontinalioides, the first possibly a mistake, have not been
seen by any more recent observer.
The Botanical Calendars by Thomas Jowett, which appeared in a
Nottingham newspaper during 1826, give localities for a large number of
mosses, including most of those mentioned by Deering. Among the
numerous species recorded for the first time was the so-called ' Luminous
Moss' (Scbistostega osmundacea)^ found abundantly in the sandstone caves
on Nottingham Forest, on a site now occupied by the Church Cemetery.
About this time considerable interest seems to have been taken in
this group of plants, and in 1833 Dr. Howitt and Wm. Valentine, F.L.S.,
commenced the publication of a work entitled Muscologia Nottinghamiensis,
consisting of dried specimens of mosses with descriptive text. Three
fasciculi, each containing eight species, were issued, but the work then
came to an abrupt termination.
Six years later, in his Nottinghamshire Flora, Dr. Howitt enumerates
all the species then known to occur in the county, adding to the records
of Deering and Jowett a considerable number discovered by Valentine and
himself. Up to the present time this has remained practically the only
available source of information respecting the mosses of the county.
61
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Some attention has been paid by the present writer to the moss flora
of Nottinghamshire, and has resulted in the discovery of a considerable
number of species not previously recorded. On the other hand, no
fewer than forty of the 134 species given in Hewitt's Flora still await
re-discovery. A large proportion of these should certainly turn up again,
but it is probable that some few were errors of identification. It is
scarcely likely, for instance, that such species as Dicranella secunda, Dicra-
noiveisia crispula, Dicranum /ongtfo/ium, Anoectangium compactum, and Ortbo-
thecium rufescens ever really occurred in the county.
The moss flora of Nottinghamshire cannot be considered at all a rich
one, only 192 species together with some two dozen well-marked varieties
having as yet been recorded. The entire absence of the older Palaeozoic
and of igneous rocks, and the almost total absence of bog, combined with the
low elevation of the county, largely account for this comparative poverty.
Sphagna are rare as the natural result of the draining of the bogs in
which they formerly flourished, and the few patches that still remain are
confined to the margins of the streams that run through the reclaimed
bog-land. The most noteworthy species is Sphagnum fallax, which has
only recently been recorded as a British species.
The Magnesian Limestone is by far the most productive formation for
mosses in Nottinghamshire, as many as 136 species occurring upon it, and
forty-three of these have not as yet been found elsewhere in the county.
The best localities are Creswell Crags, Pleasley Vale, and the old lime-
stone quarries about Worksop, Warsop, Mansfield, Kirkby, and Bulwell.
Among the more noteworthy species are ; Tetraphis pellucida^ abundant
on tree stumps and banks at Pleasley Vale and elsewhere ; Pottia bryoides ;
Pottia Heimii, a maritime species first found by the Rev. A. Thornley on a
brick wall at South Leverton in the Trent Valley, and subsequently by the
writer in a magnesian limestone quarry at Worksop ; Tortula aloides and
T. marginata at Creswell Crags and other localities ; Earbula gracih's,
gathered by Mr. C. T. Musson, F.L.S., on a magnesian limestone wall at
Sutton in Ashfield, on 19 April, 1886 ; Weisia tenuis, abundant on a
vertical face of rock in a stone quarry at Mansfield ; Zygodon Mougeotii at
Creswell Crags ; Bryum pendulum and B. pseudo-triquetrum at Mansfield,
etc. ; Mnium subglobosum at Sutton in Ashfield ; Eurhynchium pumilum at
Creswell Crags, and E. megapolttanum near Newstead ; Plagiothecium
depressum at G rives Wood, Kirkby ; Amblystegium irriguum and Hypnum
Sendtneri in quarries about Worksop.
On the Bunter sandstone about thirty species are found which are
peculiar to this formation. Most of the Sphagna are confined to it ;
Dicranum montanum occurs in the Birklands, Sherwood Forest ; Rhacomi-
trium heterostichum on a vertical face of sandstone in the Church Cemetery
at Nottingham ; the beautiful ' luminous moss ' (Schistostega osmundacea]
is still to be found in the caves in the Church Cemetery where Jowett and
Howitt first noticed it over eighty years ago ; Bryum roseum, one of the
handsomest of British mosses, grows abundantly by the stream at Budby
in Sherwood Forest ; Erachythecium salebrosum has been gathered near
6a
BOTANY
Bawtry ; and Hypnum cordifolium occurs along the Rainworth Water, as
well as on the Keuper marl at Leverton, where it was discovered by the
Rev. A. Thornley.
The Keuper marl and Lias clays possess few distinctive mosses,
Fissidens exi/is, Tortu/a paplllosa^ Earbula lurida^ Welsia squarrosa, Mnium
stellare and Erachytheclum illecebrum being among the more interesting
Keuper species, while Earbula recuruifo/ia has only been found on the Lias
at Gotham.
In the following list of the mosses of Nottinghamshire, the arrange-
ment and nomenclature of Dixon's Handbook of British Mosses are adopted,
except that in the genus Sphagnum Horrell's European Sphagnaceae has
been followed. Species whose occurrence rests solely on the authority of
Howitt and earlier botanists are distinguished by the addition of the
name of the observer. For all others the present writer is responsible,
and it may be well to mention that specimens of all these species
(excepting the Sphagna) have been submitted to Mr. E. M. Holmes,
and in the case of all obscure forms to Mr. H. N. Dixon also ; no
doubtful species has been admitted to the list, and the identifications may
therefore be regarded as authoritative. The Sphagna were kindly named
by Mr. E. C. Horrell.
SPHAGNACEAE
acutifolium, Ehrh.
(Howitt and
Sphagnum
Bohler) 2
— subnitens, Russ. and Warnst., var. pallescens,
Warnst. 2
— squarrosum, Pers. (Valentine) 2
— fallax, Kling. 2.
— cuspidatum, Ehrh. (J. Bohler) 2
— recurvum, R. and W., var. mucronatum,
Warnst. 2
— compactum, DC. (Howitt) 2
— rufescens, Warnst. 4
— cymbifolium, Warnst., var.
Warnst. 2
var. pallescens, Warnst. 4
— papillosum, Lindb., var. sublaeve, Limpr.
TETRAPHIDACEAE
Tetraphis pellucida, Hedw. I, 3
glaucescens,
PoLYTRICHACEAB
Catharinea undulata, Web. and Mohr
var. minor, W. and M. 2, 3
var. Haussknechtii, Dixon I
Polytrichum nanum, Neck. (Howitt)
— aloides, Hedw. I, 2
— urnigerum, L. (Howitt) 2
— piliferum, Schreb. 2
— juniperinum, Willd. 2—4
— formosum, Hedw. 3
— commune, L. 1—4
DlCRANACEAE
Pleuridium axillare, Lindb. 3
— subulatum, Rabenh. (Howitt)
Ccratodon purpureus, Brid. 1-4
'-4
DICRANACEAE (continued)
Dichodontium pellucidum, Schimp. 3
Dicranella heteromalla, Schp. 1-4
— secunda, Lindb. (Jowett)
- varia, Schp. 1-3
Dicranoweisia cirrhata, Lindb. 2, 3
- crispula, Lindb. (Howitt) I, 2
Campylopus flexuosus, Brid. 2
Dicranum Bonjeani, De Not. 2, 4
— scoparium, Hedw. 1-4
var. paludosum, Schp. I, 4
var. spadiceum, Boul. 2
— montanum, Hedw. 2
— longifolium, Ehrh. (Howitt) I
Leucobryum glaucum, Schp. 2, 4
FlSSIDEXTACEAE
Fissidens exilis, Hedw. 3
— viridulus, Wahl. I, 3
— incurvus, Starke I, 3, 4
— bryoides, Hedw. I, 3
— adiantoides, Hedw. I, 2
— taxifolius, Hedw. I, 3, 4
GRIMMIACEAE
Grimmia apocarpa, Ehrh. 3
— pulvinata, Sm. 1—4
Rhacomitrium heterostichum, Brid. 2
— canescens, Brid. (Valentine and Howitt) 2
Ptychomitrium polyphyllum, FUrnr. (Deering
only)
Hedwigia ciliata, Ehrh. (Valentine) 2
ToRTULACEAE
Acaulon muticum, C.M. (Howitt) 2
Phascum cuspidatum, Schreb. 3
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
TORTULACEAE (continued')
Pottia recta, Mitt. (Valentine) z
- bryoides, Mitt. I, 3
— Heimii, Ftlrnr. i, 3
— truncatula, Lindb. 2, 3
— intermedia, Fttrnr. I
— mmutula, Ftlrnr. (Valentine)
— Starkeana, C.M. (Valentine)
— lanceolata, C.M. \, 3
Tortulla pusilla, Mitt. (Valentine) i, 3
— ambigua, Angstr. I
— aloides, De Not. I, 3
— marginata, Spruce i
— mur.ilis, Hedw. 1-4
var. rupestris, Schultz I
- subulata, Hedw. 1-3
— laevipila, Schwgr. i, 2
— intermedia, Berk. I
— ruralis, Ehrh. 3
— papillosa, Wils. 3
Barbula lurida, Lindb. i, 3
- rubella, Mitt, i, 4
var. dentata, Schp. i
— tophacea, Mitt. I, 3
- fallax, Hedw. i, 3
var. brevifolia, Schultz I
— recurvifolia, Schp. 4
- rigidula, Mitt. I, 3
— cylindrica, Schp. I, 3
— sinuosa, Braithw. i
— gracilis, Schwgr. i
- Hornschuchiana, Schultz 2, 3
- revoluta, Brid. i
— convoluta, Hedw. i
— unguiculata, Hedw. i, 3
var. cuspidata, B. and S. 1,3
Weisia crispa, Mitt. (Valentine)
— squarrosa, C. M. 3
- microstoma, C.M. (Valentine) 3
— verticillata, Brid. i
— viridula, Hedw. 1-3
var. amblyodon, B. and S. 3
— tenuis, C.M. i
Cinclidotus fontinalioides, P. Beauv. (Deering
only) i, 3
ENCALYPTACEAE
Encalypta vulgaris, Hedw. i, 2
— streptocarpa, Hedw. i
ORTHOTRICHACEAE
Anoectangium compactum, Schwgr. (Howitt) i
Zygodon Mougeotii, B. and S. i
Ulota crispa, Brid. (Valentine and Howitt) I, 2
Orthotrichum anomalum, Hedw., var. saxatile,
Milde I
— leiocarpum, B. and S. (Howitt)
— Lyellii, H. and T. (Howitt) 2
— affine, Schrad. I
— rivulare, Turn. (Howitt) I
— diaphanum, Schrad. i, 3, 4
SCHISTOSTEGACEAE
Schistostega osmundacea, Mohr
64
SFLACHNACEAE
Splachnum ampullaceum,L.(Jowett and Howitt) 2
FUNARIACEAE
Ephemerum serratum, Hpe. (Valentine)
Physcomitrella patens,B. and S. (Valentine, 1837) 3
Physcomitrium pyriforme, Brid. I, 3
Funaria hygrometrica, Sibth. i -4
var. calvescens, B. and S. i
MEESIACEAE
Aulacomnium palustre, Schwgr. 2
— androgynum, Schwgr. 1—4
BARTRAMIACEAB
Bartramia pomiformis, Hedw. 2
Philonotis fontana, Brid. (Howitt)
BRYACEAE
Leptobryum pyriforme, Wils. 1-3
VVebera nutans, Hedw. I, 3, 4
— carnea, Schp. 1-3
— albicans, Schp. 2
Bryum pendulum, Schp. i
— pallens, Sw. i, 2
— bimum, Schreb. 2
— pseudo-triquetrum, Schwgr. i, 2
— pallescens, Schleich. I (?), 3 (?)
— affine, Lindb. i
— intermedium, Brid. I
— caespiticium, L. I, 3
— capillare, L. 1-4
— atropurpureum, W. and M. (bicolor, Dicks.)
>, 3
— argenteum, L. 1-3
— roseum, Schreb. 2
Mnium affine, Bland., var. elatum, B. and S. 2
var. rugicum, B. and S. 2
— cuspidatum, Hedw. i, 3
— rostratum, Schrad. 1—4
— undulatum, L. 1—3
— hornum, L. 1-4
— stellare, Reich, i, 3
— punctatum, L. I, 2, 4
var. elatum, Schp. i
— subglobosum, B. and S. I
FONTINALACEAE
Fontinalis antipyretica, L. I, 3
CRYPHAEACEAE
Cryphaea heteromalla, Mohr (Valentine) 3
NECKERACEAE
Neckera crispa, Hedw. (Howitt) i
— pumila, Hedw. (Valentine and Bakewell) 3
— complanata, Hubn. i, 3
Homalia trichomanoides, B. and S. I
LEUCODONTACEAB
Leucodon sciuroides, Schwgr. (Valentine and
Howitt) i
Porotrichum alopecurum, Mitt, i, 3
BOTANY
LESKEACEAB
Leskea polycarpa, Ehrh. (Howitt) I, 3
Anomodon viticulosus, H. and T. 1,3
Thuidium tamariscinum, B. and S. 1-4
HVPNACEAB
Climacium dendroides, W. and M. 1—3
Orthothecium rufescens, B. and S. (Jowett and
Eddison) I
Camptothecium sericeum, Kindb. 1-4
— lutescens, B. and S. I, 2, 3 or 4
Brachythecium albicans, B. and S. (Howitt)
— salcbrosum, B. and S. 2
— rutabulum, B. and S. 1-4
— rivulare, B. and S. 3
— velutinum, B. and S. I, 3, 4
— plumosum, B. and S. 2 or 3
— illecebrum, De Not. 3
— purum, Dixon 1-4
Eurhynchium piliferum, B. and S. 1,2
— praelongum, Hobk. 1-4
var. Stokesii, Brid. 2 or 3
— Swartzii, Hobk. 1-3
— pumilum, Schp. i, 3
— tenellum, Milde I, 2 or 3
— myosuroides, Schp. (Eddison) I
— myurum, Dixon (Eddison) I
— stria turn, B. and S. 3, 4
— rusciformc, Milde I, 3
var. atlanticum, Brid. I
— murale, Milde I, 2
var. complanatum, B. and S. I
— confertum, Milde I, 3, 4
HYPNACBAH (continued)
Eurhynchium megapolitanum, Milde I
Plagiothecium depressum, Dixon I
— denticulaturn, B. and S. 1—4
— sylvaticum, B. and S. 1-3
— undulatum, B. and S. I, 2, 4
Amblystegium serpens, B. and S. 1—4
— varium, Lindb. 2 or 3
— irriguum, B. and S. I
— filicinum, De Not. I, 3
Hypnum riparium, L. I, 2
— stellatum, Schreb. I
— chrysophyllum, Brid. I
• — aduncum, Hedw. I, 3
— Sendtneri, Schp. I
— fluitans, L. 1,3
— exannulatum, Gttmb. I
— revolvens, Sw. 3
- commutatum, Hedw. I
— cupressiforme, L. 1-4
var. resupinatum, Schp. I, 3
„ filiforme, Brid. 3
„ minus, Wils. 3
„ ericetorum, B. and S. 1,2
— molluscum, Hedw. I, 3 or 4
— palustre, Huds. I, 3
— cordifolium, Hedw. z, 3
— cuspidatum, L. 1—4
— Schreberi, Willd. I, 2
Hylocomium splendens, B. and S. 1—3, 4 (?)
— loreum, B. and S. (Howitt) 2
— squarrosum, B. and S. 1-4
— triquetrum, B. and S. I, 3
LIVERWORTS AND SCALE MOSSES
HEPATICAE
The Liverworts of Nottinghamshire are only imperfectly known,
few local botanists having made them the object of serious study. The
earliest local observer of these plants was Charles Deering, who in his
Catalogus Stirpium (1738) includes eight species, viz.: — Frullania dilatata,
Radula complanata, Cephalozia bicuspidata, Lopbocolea bidentata, Plagiochila
asplenioides, Marchantia polymorpha^ Conocepbalus conicus, and Reboulia
bemisphaerica. The correctness of the last record may perhaps be
questioned, but the others are all more or less common and widely
distributed. Jowett in 1826 only added a single species to Deering's
list, this being Cephalozia (Odontoschisma] sphagni, which he found
growing among Sphagnum obtusifolium in Oxton Bogs. This does not
appear to have been noticed by any later observer. In Howitt's Flora
(1839) Pellia epiphylla and Metzgeria pubescent are given on the authority
of Mr. W. Valentine and Mr. R. Bakewell respectively. The former
species is abundant everywhere in damp places at the present day, and
the latter has recently been gathered at Creswell Crags. Howitt himself
added four new species, viz. Kantia trichomanis, Nardia scalaris, Aneura
pinguis and Metzgeria furcata ; of these the first and last are fairly
i 65 9
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
common, Aneura is abundant in a quarry at Linby, but Nardia has not
recently been found. Four additional species occur in a list of the
plants of Sherwood Forest by John Bohler;1 these are Cephalozia conni'vens,
Scapania nemorosa, Blasia pusilla, and Lunularia cruciata. The last-named
is one of our commonest liverworts, and it is difficult to account for its
omission from the works of Deering, Jowett, and Howitt. During the
last five or six years many new species have been found to occur in the
county, but many more doubtless remain to be discovered. At best,
however, our hepatic-flora cannot be otherwise than a poor one, owing to
the absence from the county of the conditions most favourable to the
growth of these plants. It is therefore not altogether surprising that of
the 220 or so species recorded for the British Islands, we should at present
be able to claim only about forty.
In the list which follows all species to which no observer's name is
attached have been collected recently by the present writer, whose
specimens have all been examined and their identity certified by Mr. D.
McArdle.
Frullania Tamarisci, Dum. (H. Fisher)
- dilatata, Dum.
Radula complanata, Dum.
Porella platyphylla, Lindb.
Blepharozia ciliaris, Dum.
Lepidozia reptans, Dum. (H. Fisher)
Kantia trichomanis, Gr. and B.
Cephalozia bicuspid.ita, Dum.
- connivens, Spruce (Bohler)
- Sphagni, Spruce (Jowett)
- divaricata, Dum. (Fisher)
Scapania nemorosa, Dum. (Bohler)
Diplophyllum albicans, Dum.
Lophocolea bidentata, Dum.
- cuspidata, Limpr.
- heterophylla, Dum.
Chilocyphus polyanthos, Dum.
Pedinophyllum interruptum, Lindb.1
Plagiochila asplenioides, Dum.
var. humilis, Lindenb.
Jungermania riparia, Tayl.
Jungermania inflata, Huds. (Fisher)
— turbinata, Raddi
f. acutiloba, Spruce (= Jung. corcyracea,Nees)
— capitata, Hook. (Fisher)
— ventricosa, Dicks.
Nardia scalaris, Gr. and B. (Howitt)
Fossombronia pusilla, Dum. (Fishei)
Blasia pusilla, L. (Bohler)
Pellia epiphylla, Lindb.
- calycina, Tayl.
Aneura multifida, Dum.
— pinguis, Dum.
Metzgeria pubescens, Raddi
- furcata, Dum.
Marchantia polymorpha, L.
Conocephalus conicus, Dum.
Reboulia hemisphaerica, Raddi (Deering, Howitt,
Bohler) Not seen recently 3
Lunularia cruciata, Dum.
Ricciella fluitans, Braun
ALGAE
CHARACEAE (Stonworts)
The Characeae of Nottinghamshire have not been systematically
worked out, and only five species are certainly known to occur in the county.
These are Chora fragilis, Desv., which grows in ponds and canals in the
magnesian limestone district ; C. contraria, Kuetz., found in a pond at
Sutton in Ashfield, and, like the first-named species, now placed on
record for the first time ; C. bispida, L., first recorded by Deering, and of
rather frequent occurrence ; C. vu/garis, L., also noticed by Deering, and
common in canals and ponds, with, occasionally, its variety longibracteatat
1 In White's Worksop, the Dukery, and Sherwood forest, 1875.
1 This hepatic, which is rare as a British species, was collected at Creswell Crags, on 17 April, 1899.
1 Is it possible that the following species (Lunularia cruciata) was meant f
66
BOTANY
Kuetz. ; and Nitella Jiexilis, Ag., first found by Jowett at Bulwell, and
recorded by Messrs. Groves as collected by Mr. H. Searle near Work-
sop, in 1885. Tolypella glomera ta should certainly be found with us, as it
grows in a pond just over the county border in Derbyshire. 7*. intricata
also has occurred in Yorkshire, close to the Nottinghamshire boundary.
Of the Algae, other than Characeae, practically nothing is known ;
they have not been seriously studied by a single Nottinghamshire
botanist, and only a few species which, by their abundance, force them-
selves upon the notice of the collector of other aquatic plants, or are
looked for on account of their beauty as microscopic objects, have had
any chance of being recorded. Vofoox globator occurs in abundance in
ponds in certain localities ; desmids and diatoms of many and varied
kinds may be found in profusion in suitable places, and species of
Zygnema, Spirogyra, Oedogonium, etc., are common. Cladophora glomerata
is abundant in canals ; Prasiola crispa and Enteromorpha intestinalis are not
uncommon. Chroolepus aureus is sometimes quite a feature of damp rock
faces in magnesian limestone quarries. Nostoc occurs in extraordinary
abundance in the stream in Shireoaks Park, and on damp ground in
various places. Batrachospermum moniliforme has occurred in the lake at
Newstead Abbey, and the curious Hildenbrandtia rivu/aris, which covers
stones in streams with blood-red incrustations, is found in the River
Poulter at Elksley near Retford, and probably elsewhere in North
Nottinghamshire.
LICHENS
A few species of Lichens were recorded by Deering in 1738, and a
century later Howitt, in his Nottinghamshire F/ora, gave localities for
many additional species, largely on the authority of Messrs. Deakin and
Bohler. No more recent worker seems to have touched these plants,
and the list which follows is taken almost entirely from Howitt's work.
The names and arrangement adopted are those of Crombie's British
Lichens, as far as published, i.e., up to and including Urceolaria scruposa ;
the remaining species are given under the names they bear in Leighton's
Lichen Flora.
Collema cheileum, Ach.
— nigrescens, Ach.
Leptogium lacerum, Gray
— palmatum, Mont.
Calicium hyperellum, Ach.
— quercinum, Pers.
Sphaerophorus coralloides, Pers.
Baeomyces rufus, DC.
Cladonia pyxidata, Fr.
— fimbriata, Fr.
— gracilis, Hoffm.
— furcata, Hoffm.
— squamosa, Hoffra.
- delicata, Florke
— coccifera, Schaer.
— deformis, Hoffm.
- macilenta, Hoffm.
Cladina rangiferina, Nyl.
— uncialis, Nyl.
Ramalina farinacea, Ach.
— fraxinea, Ach.
— fastigiata, Ach.
Usnea hirta, Hoffm.
Cetraria aculeata, Fr.
Platysma glaucum, Nyl.
Evernia prunastri, Ach.
— furfuracea, Fr.
Parmelia saxatilis, Ach.
— omphalodes, Ach.
— caperata, Ach.
— olivacea, L. (?)
— physodes, Ach.
Lobaria pulmonaria, Hoffm.
Peltigera canina, Hoffm.
67
Peltigera rufescens, Hoffm.
— spuria, Leight.
- polydactyla, Hoffm.
- horizontalis, Hoffm.
Physcia parietina, De Not.
— ciliaris, DC.
— pulverulenta, Nyl.
— stellaris, Nyl.
subsp. tenella, Nyl.
— ulothrix, Nyl., var. virella.
Cromb.
Lecanora saxicola, Ach.
— laciniosa, Nyl.
— vitellina, Ach.
— citrina, Ach.
— aurantiaca, Nyl.
— cerin.i, Ach.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Lecanora sophodes, Ach.
— exigua, Nyl.
— subfusca, Nyl. (?)
- albella, Ach.
— sulphurea, Ach.
— varia, Ach.
— atra, Ach.
— parella, Ach.
— coccinea, Cromb.
— calcarea, Somm.
Pertusaria globulifera, Nyl.
— amara, Nyl.
— velata, forma aspergilla,
Cromb
— communis, DC.
Pertusaria Wulfenii, DC.
— lutescens, Lamy
Phlyctis agelaea, Koerb.
Thelotrema lepadinum, Ach.
Urceolaria scruposa, Ach.
Lecidea dubia, Borr.
— quernea, Dicks.
— parasema, Ach.
— coarctata, Sm.
— canescens, Dicks.
— Lightfootii, Sm.
— anomala, Fr.
— lutea, Dicks.
— incompta, Borr.
Lecidea abietina, Ach.
Opegrapha herpetica, Ach.,
f. rufescens, Pers.
— atra, Pers.
— varia, Pers.
— lyncea, Sm.
Stigmatidium crassum, Duby(r)
Arthonia epipasta, Ach.
Graphis elegans, Sm. (?)
— scripta, Ach. (?)
Verrucaria epidermidis, Ach.
— cinerea, Pers.
— punctiformis, Ach.
— nitida, Weig.
FUNGI
The Mycology of Nottinghamshire has until quite recently been a
much neglected study, and although various references to the fungi of
the county exist, the records chiefly occur in obscure publications which
are not readily accessible and are almost unknown to the majority of
workers in the subject. Our previous knowledge of this interesting
group of cryptogamic plants has been greatly augmented by the work
done in Sherwood Forest in September, 1897, by the members of the
British Mycological Society; indeed, the collections made on this occa-
sion have furnished the greater part of the material for the list which
follows.
The earliest writer on local fungi was the talented Nottingham
physician, botanist, and historian, Charles Deering, who, in his remark-
able work Catalogus Stirpium, etc., published in 1738, enumerates some 100
or more species as occurring in the neighbourhood of Nottingham. In
the absence of figures or descriptions it is, however, impossible in the
great majority of cases to determine with any certainty the modern
equivalents of Deering's names ; and his records, with a few exceptions,
do not therefore appear in the subjoined list.
During the next hundred years a few references to fungi appear in
local works, the most important being those by Thomas Jowett, a Not-
tingham surgeon, who, under the pseudonym of ' II Rosajo,' published a
series of 'Botanical Calendars' in the Nottingham Journal for 1826.
Those of his records which can be determined without any doubt are
here included.
In 1832 and 1833 the eminent mycologist M. J. Berkeley seems to
have spent some time in Nottinghamshire, and noticed a number of fungi,
several of which were new to science. These he describes in his work
on British fungi which forms vol. v, part 2, of Smith's "English Flora.
Nothing further seems to have been done until 1875, in which year
John Bohler contributed to White's Worksop, TheDukery, and Sherwood Forest
an extensive list of the fungi of that district ; and a further account of
the mycology of North Nottinghamshire is given by the Rev. Hilderic
Friend in the Transactions of the Nottingham Naturalists' Society for 1886.
68
BOTANY
In this paper most of Bohler's records are repeated, and a number of new
species noted.
In September, 1897, the British Mycological Society held its annual
meeting at Worksop, and devoted four days to the systematic investiga-
tion of the fungi of Sherwood Forest, with the result that some 250 species
were added to the fungus-flora of the district. All the specimens gathered
on this occasion were identified by Mr. George Massee, Dr. C. B. Plow-
right, or Mr. Carleton Rea, B.C.L., M.A., who were present at the
meeting. Lists of the species found were drawn up for me by Mr. C.
Rea, Mr. A. Clarke, and Mr. C. T. M. Plowright, and to these
gentlemen my thanks are due. To Mr. Rea especially I am indebted,
not only for his valuable assistance on this occasion, but also for naming
all my subsequent gatherings of fungi from the neighbourhood of
Nottingham, many of which had not previously been found in the
county.
A detailed list, with localities and authorities, of the Nottingham-
shire basidiomycetous fungi will be found in the Transactions of the
Nottingham Naturalists' Society for 1897—8. A few later additions have
been incorporated in the present list.
The arrangement and nomenclature adopted are those of Mr. G.
Massee in his British Fungus Flora, excepting that the Uredineae, etc.,
which are not included in that work, are arranged as in Dr. C. B. Plow-
right's British Uredineae and Ustilagineae : —
BASIDIOMYCETES
GASTROMYCETES
Scleroderma vulgare, Fr.
— verrucosum, Pers.
— bovista, Fr. (?)
Cyathus striatus, Hoffm.
— vernicosus, DC.
Crucibulum vulgare, Tul.
Sphaerobolus stellatus, Tode
Lycoperdon excipuliforme, Scop.
— saccatum, Vahl
— gemmatum, Batsch
— pyriforme, Schaeff.
— perlatum, Pers.
— caelatum, Bull.
— bovista, L.
— plumbeum, Pers.
— nigrescens, Vitt.
— pusillum, Fr.
Geaster Bryantii, Berk.
— limbatus, Fr.
— fornicatus, Fr.
Tulostoma mammosum, Fr. (?)
Ithyphallus impudicus, Fisch.
Mutinus caninus, Fr.
HYMENOMYCETES
Auricularia mesenterica, Fr.
Hirneola auricula-judae, Berk.
Exidia glandulosa, Fr.
BASIDIOMYCETES (cont.) BASIDIOMYCETES (cont.)
HYMENOMYCETES (cont.)
Exidia albida, Bref.
Ulocolla foliacea, Bref.
Tremella frondosa, Fr.
— mesenterica, Retz.
— viscosa, Berk.
— versicolor, Berk.
— tubercularia, Berk.
— sarcoides, Sm. (The conidial
stage of Ombrophila sar-
coides)
Dacryomyccs deliquescens, Duby
— stillatus, Nees
Calocera viscosa, Fr.
Clavaria fastigiata, L.
— muscoides, L.
— coralloides, L.
— cinerea, Bull.
— cristata, Holmsk.
— rugosa, Bull.
— Kunzei, Fr.
— crocea, Pers. (?)
— fragilis, Holmsk.
— uncialis, Grev.
— pistillaris, L.
Pistillaria tenuipes, Mass.
Coniophora olivacea, Mass.
— sulphurea, Mass.
— puteana, Mass.
Thelephora palmata, Fr.
69
HYMENOMYCETES (cont.)
Thelephora terrestris, Ehrh.
— laciniata, Pers.
Soppittiella sebacea, Mass.
- crustacea, Mass.
Peniophora quercina, Cooke
— gigantea, Mass.
- rosea, Mass.
— incarnata, Mass.
— ochracea, Mass.
— cinerea Cooke
— velutina, Cooke
Hymenochaete rubiginosa, Lev.
Corticium sebaceum, Mass.
— lacteum, Fr.
— leve, Pers.
— arachnoideum, Berk.
— sambuci, Fr.
— lactescens, Berk.
— sanguineum, Fr.
— coeruleum, Fr.
— lividum, Pers.
— comedens, Fr.
Stereum hirsutum, Fr.
— purpureum, Pers.
— sanguinolentum, Fr.
— rugosum, Fr.
Craterellus cornucopioides, Pers.
Cyphella capula, Fr.
Solenia anomala, Fr.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
BASIDIOMYCETES (coat.) BASIDIOMYCETES (cant.)
HYMENOMYCETKS (coat.)
Hydnum repandum, L.
- zonatum, Batsch
— coralloides, Scop.
— ochraceum, Pers.
— viride, Fr.
— udum, Fr.
— niveum, Pcrs.
- farinaceum, Pers.
Caldesiella ferruginosa, Sacc.
Irpex obliquus, Fr.
Radulum orbiculare, Fr.
— quercinum, Fr.
Phlebia merismoides, Fr.
Grandinia granulosa, Fr.
Porothelium Stevenson!, B. & Br
Merulius lachrymans, Fr.
— molluscus, Fr.
— corium, Fr.
Daedalea quercina, Pers.
— unicolor, Fr.
Trametes serpens, Fr.
Poria vaporaria, Fr.
- vulgaris, Fr. (?)
- medulla-panis, Fr.
- hibcrnica, B. & Br.
- blcpharistoma, B. & Br.
- terrestris, Yr.
- purpurea, Fr.
Polystictus perennis, Fr.
- versicolor, Fr.
- velutinus, Fr.
- abietinus, Fr.
Fomes lucidus, Fr.
- ulmarius, Fr.
- applanatus, Wallr.
- connatus, Fr.
- fomentarius, Fr.
- igniarius, Fr.
- salicinus, Fr.
- fraxineus, Fr.
- annosus, Fr.
- conchatus, Fr.
Polyporus lentus, Berk.
- rufescens, Fr.
— squamosus, Fr.
- elegans, Fr.
- giganteus, Fr.
- sulphureus, Fr.
— - dryadeus, Fr.
- hispidus, Fr.
- quercinus, Fr. (?)
- betulinus, Fr.
- adustus, Fr.
- caesius, Fr.
— spumeus, Fr.
— pallescens, Fr.
— fragilis, Fr.
— armeniacus, Berk.
Fistulina hepatica, Fr.
Boletus luteus, L.
— elegans, Schum.
- flavus, With.
— chrysenteron, Fr.
HYMENOMYCETES (coat.)
Boletus subtomentosus, L.
— impolitus, Fr.
— variecolor, B. and Br.
— castaneus, Bull.
— badius, L.
— piperatus, Bull.
— bovinus, L.
— granulatus, L.
— pachypus, Fr.
— edulis, Bull.
— crassus, Mass.
— satanas, Lenz.
— luridus, Schaeff.
„ var. erythropus, Fr.
— felleus, Bull.
— laricinus, Berk.
— scaber, Fr.
„ var. aurantiacus, Bull.
— versipellis, Fr.
Coprinus comatus, Fr.
— atramentarius, Fr.
— niveus, Fr.
— micaceus, Fr.
- macrocephalus, Fr. (?)
— domesticus, Fr.
— ephemerus, Fr.
— plicatilis, Fr.
Anellaria separata, Karst.
— fimiputris, Karst.
Panaeolus papilionaceus, Fr.
— campanulatus, L.
Psathyrella gracilis, Fr.
- atomata, Fr.
- disseminata, Pers.
Gomphidius glutinosus, Schaeff.
• — viscidus, Fr.
Psathyra corrugis, Pers.
- semivestita, B. and Br.
Psilocybe semilanceata, Fr.
„ var. caerulescens, Cke.
— spadicea, Fr.
— foenisecii, Pers.
Hypholoma sublatcritium,
Schaeff.
— fasciculare, Huds.
— elaeodes, Fr.
— lachrymabundum, Fr.
— velutinum, Pers.
— pyrotrichum, Holmsk.
— appendiculatum, Bull.
— hydrophilum, Bull.
Stropharia aeruginosa, Curt.
— albo-cyanea, Desm.
— inuncta, Fr.
— coronilla, Bull.
— squamosa, Fr.
— semiglobata, Batsch
Agaricus campestris, L.
„ var. silvicola, Vitt.
— arvensis, Schaeff.
— silvaticus, Schaeff.
— haemorrhoidarius, Schulz.
— comptulus, Fr.
70
BASIDIOMYCETES (coat.)
HYMENOMYCETES (font.)
Agaricus xanthodermus, Genev.
Paxillus lepista, Fr.
— involutus, Fr.
— atro-tomentosus, Fr.
Cortinarius (Hygrocybe) leuco-
pus, Bull.
— (Hygrocybe) obtusus, Fr.
— (Telamonia) hinnuleus, Fr.
„ flexipes, Fr.
„ hemitrichus, Fr.
„ rigidus, Fr.
— (Dermocybe) caninus, Fr.
„ lepidopus, Cke.
„ sanguineus, Fr.
— (Inoloma) violaceus, L.
„ alboviolaceus, Fr.
„ pholideus, Fr.
- (Myxacium) elatior, Fr.
— (Phlegmacium) varius, Fr.
„ caerulescens, Fr.
„ purpurascens, Fr.
Tubaria furfuracea, Pers.
Flammula carbonaria, Fr.
- flavida, Schaeff.
— inopoda, Fr.
— • sapinea, Fr.
— picrea, Fr.
Galera tenera, Schaeff.
— hypnorum, Batsch
- mniophila, Lasch.
Naucoria melinoides, Fr.
— badipes, Fr.
— escharoides, Fr.
Hebeloma fastibile, Fr.
— mesophaeum, Fr.
— crustuliniforme, Bull.
Inocybe pyriodora, Pers.
— incarnata, Bres.
— flocculosa, Berk.
— rimosa, Bull.
— asterospora, Quel.
— eutheles, B. and Br.
— geophylla, Fr.
Bolbitius fragilis, Fr.
Pholiota praecox, Pers.
— radicosa, Bull.
— pudica, Fr.
— aurivella, Batsch
— spectabilis, Fr.
— adiposa, Fr.
- mutabilis, Schaeff.
— marginata, Batsch
— unicolor, Fl. Dan.
Claudopus variabilis, Pers.
Clitopilus prunulus, Scop.
— orcella, Bull.
— mundulus, Lasch.
Leptonia lampropoda, Fr.
— serrulata, Fr.
— chloropolius, Fr.
— formosa, Fr.
Nolanea pascua, Pers.
— nigripes, Trog.
BOTANY
BASIDIOMYCETES (cont.)
HYMBNOMYCETES (cont.)
Entoloma prunuloides, Fr.
— jubatum, Fr.
— sericellum, Fr.
— majale, Fr.
- costatum, Fr.
- sericeum, Fr.
— nidorosum, Fr.
Pluteus cervinus, Schaeff.
„ var. patricius, Schulz.
„ var. eximius, Saund. &
Sm.
Volvaria speciosa, Fr.
— gloiocephala, DC.
Lenzites betulina, Fr.
— flaccida, Fr.
Panus stypticus, Fr.
Lentinus cochleatus, Fr.
Cantharellus cibarius, Fr.
— aurantiacus, Fr.
— carbonarius, Fr.
— umbonatus, Fr.
— infundibuliformis, Fr.
— retirugus, Fr.
Nyctalis parasitica, Fr.
— asterophora, Fr.
Hygrophorus (Hygrocybe) ce-
raceus, Wulf.
— (Hygrocybe) cocci neus, Schaeff.
miniatus, Fr.
puniceus, Fr.
conicus, Fr.
chlorophanus, Fr.
psittacinus, Schaeff.
— (Camarophyllus) nemoreus,
Fr.
„ pratensis, Fr.
„ virgineus, Wulf.
„ niveus, Fr.
„ ovinus, Bull.
— (Limacium) eburneus, Bull.
„ cerasinus, Berk.
Pleurotus dryinus, Pers.
— ostreatus, Jacq.
— applicatus, Batsch
Omphalia hydrogramma, Fr.
— pyzidata, Bull.
— campanella, Batsch, var. badi-
pus, Fr.
— grisea, Fr.
— fibula, Bull.
„ var. Swartzii, Fr.
Clitocybe nebularis, Batsch
— clavipes, Pers.
— odora, Sow.
— rivulosa, Pers.
- cerrusata, Fr.
- candicans, Pers.
- dealbata, Sow.
— gallinacea, Scop.
— decastes, Fr.
- fumosa, Pers.
- gigantea, Sow.
— infundibuliformis, Schaeff.
BASIDIOMYCETES (cont.)
HYMENOMYCETES (cont.)
Clitocybe incilis, Fr.
— geotropa, Bull.
— tuba, Fr.
— cyathiformis, Bull.
— brumalis, Fr.
— fragrans, Sow.
— Sadleri, Berk.
Laccaria laccata, Scop.
Lactarius torminosus, Schaeff.
— turpis, Fr.
— insulsus, Fr.
— blennius, Fr.
— trivialis, Fr.
— chrysorrheus, Fr.
— acris, Fr.
— piperatus, Fr.
— vellereus, Fr.
— deliciosus, Fr.
— pallidus, Fr.
- quietus, Fr.
— aurantiacus, Fr.
— • theiogalus, Bull.
— rufus, Scop.
— glyciosmus, Fr.
— fuliginosus, Fr.
— serifluus, Fr.
— mitissimus, Fr.
— subdulcis, Fr.
• — • camphoratus, Fr.
Russula Integra, Fr.
- vitellina, Fr. (?)
- lutea, Fr.
- nitida, Fr.
„ var. cuprea, Cke.
— aurata, Fr.
— puellaris, Fr.
— nigricans, Fr.
- adusta, Fr.
— • delica, Fr.
— heterophylla, Fr.
— azurea, Brcs.
— virescens, Fr.
— furcata, Fr.
— lepida, Fr.
— vesca, Fr.
— depallens, Fr.
— cyanoxantha, Schaeff.
— fellea, Fr.
— rubra, Fr.
— drimeia, Cke.
— ochroleuca, Fr.
— granulosa, Cke.
— foetens, Fr.
— consobrina, Fr.
„ var. sororia, Fr.
— sardonia, Fr.
— emetica, Fr.
— rosacea, Fr.
— sanguinea, Fr.
— fragilis, Fr.
„ var. nivea, Cke.
„ var. violacea, Quel.
„ var. fallax (Cke.)
71
BASIDIOMYCETES (cont.]
HYMENOMYCETES (cont.)
Mycena capillaris, Fr.
— rorida, Fr.
— vulgaris, Pers.
— epipterygia, Scop.
— galopoda, Fr.
— sanguinolenta, A. and S.
— vitilis, Fr.
— amicta, Fr.
— • iris, Berk.
— Slopes, Bull.
— paupercula, Berk.
— alcalina, Fr.
— ammoniaca, Fr.
— stanneus, Fr.
— vitrea, Fr.
— rugosa, Fr.
— galericulata, Scop.
- polygramma, Bull
- lactea, Pers.
- luteoalba, Bolt.
- flavoalba, Fr.
- pura, Pers.
Collybia radicata, Relh.
— longipes, Bull.
- platyphylla, Fr.
— fusipes, Bull.
— maculata, A. and S.
- butyracea, Bull.
— velutipes, Fr.
- vertiruga, Cookc
— confluens, Pers.
- conigena, Pers.
- tuberosa, Bull.
- nummularia, Bull.
- tenacella, Pers.
- acervata, Fr.
- dryophila, Bull.
- ambusta, Fr.
Marasmius peronatus, Fr.
— oreades, Fr.
— erythropus, Fr.
- calopus, Fr.
— Vaillantii, Fr. (?)
- ramealis, Fr.
— rotula, Fr.
- androsaceus, Fr.
— insititius, Fr.
- epiphyllus, Fr.
Tricholoma albobrunneum,
Pers.
— rutilans, Schaeff.
— columbetta, Fr.
- imbricatum, Fr.
- terreum, Schaeff.
- saponaceum, Fr.
— cuneifolium, Fr.
— crassifolium, Berk.
— sulphureum, Fr.
— carneum, Bull.
— album, Schaeff.
— personatum, Fr.
— nudum, Bull.
— panaeolum, Fr.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
BASIDIOMYCETES (cont.)
HYMENOMYCETES (cont.)
Tricholoma melaleucum, Pers.
„ var. polioleucus, Fr.
— sordidum, Fr.
Armillaria mellea, Vahl
— mucida, Schrad.
Lepiota prominens, Viv.
— procera, Scop.
„ var. rachodes, Mass.
„ var. puellaris, Mass.
— gracilenta, Kromb.
— felina, Pers.
— metulaespora, B. and Br.
— cristata, A. and S.
— carcharias, Pers.
— granulosa, Batsch
Amanitopsis vaginata, Roze
„ var. fulva, Schaeff.
Amanita recutita, Fr.
- phalloides, Fr.
- mappa, Fr.
— pantherina, Fr.
- muscaria, Fr.
— rubescens, Fr.
— nitida, Fr.
HYPHOMYCETES
Trichoderma lignorum, Harz.
(The conidial stage of
Hyfocrea rufa)
Aspergillus glaucus, Link.
Penicillium glaucum, Link.
Sepedonium chrysospermum, Fr.
Ramularia lapsanae, Sacc.
Torula pulveracea, Corda
Zygodesmus fuscus, Corda
Bispora monilioides, Corda
Helminthosporium fusisporum,
Berk.
Stilbum tomentosum, Schr.
— fimetarium, B. and Br.
Isaria farinosa, Fr. (The conidial
condition of Cordicefs mili-
taris)
Tubercularia vulgaris, Tode
— granulata, Pers.
— nigricans, Link.
ASCOMYCETES
Ascomyces deformans, Berk.
— turgidus, Phil.
Hysterographium fraxini, De
Not.
Hypoderma commune, Duby
— conigenum, Cke.
Coccomyces dentatus, Sacc.
Coccophacidium pini, Rehm.
Rhytisma acerinum, Fr.
— salicina, Fr.
— urticae, Fr.
Cryptomyces aurcus, Mass.
ASCOMYCETES (cont.)
Cenangium furfuraceum, De
Not.
Bulgaria polymorpha, Wett.
Ombrophila sarcoides, Karst.
Mollisia lignicola, Phil.
— stramineum, B. and Br.
— cinerea, Karst.
Helotium herbarum, Fr.
Ciboria ochroleuca, Mass.
Chlorosplenium aeruginosum, De
Not.
Tapesia sanguinea, Fckl.
Lachnea scutellata, Gill
— vitellina, Gill
Dasyscypha virginea, Fckl.
— clandestina, Fckl.
— corticalis, Mass.
Geopyxis coccinea, Mass.
Peziza sepiatra, Cke.
Otidea leporina, Fckl.
— pleurota, Phil.
— cochleata, Fckl.
— aurantia, Mass.
Helvella crispa, Fr.
Leotia lubrica, Pers.
Morchella crassipes, Pers.,
var. Smithiana (Cke.)
— conica, Pers.
Mitrula viride, Karst.
Spathularia clavata, Sacc.
Geoglossum glabrum, Pers.
— difforme, Fr.
— hirsutum, Pers.
PYRENOMYCETES
Sphaeria pulvispyrius, Pers. [A
long list of species of
Sphaeria is given by Bohler,
but as only the above-
named species has been
definitely determined by
later workers it is thought
best to omit the others here]
Hypoxylon fuscum, Fr.
Xylaria polymorpha, Grev.
— hypoxylon, Grev.
— digitata, Grev.
Dothidea spp. [several are men-
tioned byBohler but require
confirmation before they
can be definitely accepted]
Nectria cinnabarina, Fr.
Hypocrea rufa, Fr.
Claviceps purpurea, Tul.
PHYCOMYCETES
Mucor mucedo, L.
Spinellus fusiger, V. T.
Pilobolus crystallinus, Tode
Cystopus candidus, Lev.
— cubicus, De B.
72
PHYCOMYCETES (cont.)
Phytophthora infestans, De B.
and other species are re-
corded by Bohler
Empusa muscae, Colin.
UREDINEAE1
Uromyces fabae (Pers.) (U.
appendiculata, L6v., Tri-
chobasis fabae, Lev., Puc-
cinia fabae, Link.)
— polygon! (Pers.)
— trifolii (A. and S.) (Tri-
chobasis fallens, Cke.)
— valerianae (Schum.) (Lecy-
thea valerianae, Berk.,
Aecidium valerianacearum,
Duby)
— poae, Rahb. (Aecidium fica-
riae, Pers.)
— rumicis (Schum.) (Uredo
bifrons, Grev.) On Ru-
mex Acetosa
— alchemillae (Pers.) (Uredo
alchemillae, Pers., Uro-
myces intrusa, Lev.) On
Akhemilla vuigaris
— scrophulariae (DC.). (Puc-
cinia scrophulariae, Lev.)
— ficariae (Schum.)
— scillarum (Grev.) (U. con-
centrica, LeV.) On Scilla
festalis
Puccinia galii (Pers.) (Tri-
chobasis galii, Lev., Puc-
cinia galiorum, Link.) On
Asperula odorata
- calthae, Link. (P. calthae
and Aecidium calthae,
Grev.)
— lapsanae (Schultz) (P. and
Aec. lapsanae, Purt., Tri-
chobasis lapsanae, Fckl.)
— pulverulenta, Grev. (Aec.
epilobii, DC., Trichobasis
epilobii, Berk.) On Efi-
kbla
— violae (Schum.). (Aec. violae
Schum., Trichobasis vio-
larum, Berk., Puccinia vio-
larum, Link.)
— pimpinellae (Strauss) (Tri-
chobasis heraclei, Cke.)
— menthae, Pers. (Aec. men-
thae, DC., Trichobasis
labiatarum, Lev.)
— primulae (DC.). (Aec. pri-
mulae, DC.)
— saniculae, Grev. (P. saniculae
and Aec. saniculae, Carm.)
* The whole of the records of Ure-
dineae and Ustilagineae rest upon the
authority of Messrs. Bohler and Friend.
BOTANY
UREDINEAE («»/.)
Puccinia graminis, Pers. (Tricho-
basis linearis, Lev., Aeci-
dium berberidis, Pers.)
Teleutospores on corn,
aecidiospores on barberry
(Herberts vulgaris)
— coronata, Corda (Aec. eras-
sum, Pers.) . Aecidiospores
on buckthorn
— rubigo-vera (DC.) (Tricho-
basis, Lev., Puccinia stra-
minis, De B.)
— poarum, Niel. (Aec. com-
positarum, Mart., var. tus-
silaginis, Pers.). Aecidio-
spores on coltsfoot (Tussilago
farfara)
— caricis (Schum.) (Trich.
caricina, Berk., Puccinia
striola, Link., Aec. urticae,
DC.)
— sylvatica, SchrOt. (Aec. cora-
positarum, var. taraxaci,
Grev.). On Taraxacum
qfficinale
— suaveolens (Pers.) (Tricho-
basis, Lev.)
— bullata (Pers.) (Trichobasis
conii, Strauss., T. cynapii,
DC., T. petroselini, Cke.,
Puccinia umbelliferarum,
DC., P. conii, Fckl.)
— hieracii (Schum.) (P. hier-
acii and P. composita-
rum, Schl., Trich. hieracii,
Schum.)
— centaureae, Mart.
— taraxaci, Plowr. (P. vari-
abilis, Grev.)
— polygon!, Pers. (P. poly-
gonorum, Link.)
— oblongata (Link.) (P. luzulae,
Lib., Trich. oblongata,
Berk.)
— lychnidearum, Link. (Puce. &
Trich. lychnidearum, Lev.)
— tragopogi (Pers.) (Aec. tra-
gopogi, Pers., Puce, sparsa,
Cke.). On goatsbeard
(Tragopogon).
— betonicae (A. and S.)
— campanulae, Carm. On
harebell (Campanula rotun-
difilia)
— aegopodii (Schum.) On
gout weed (Aegopodium Pod-
agraria)
— fusca (Relh.) (P. anemones,
Pers.). On wood anemone
(Anemone nemorosa)
— adoxae, DC. On moschatel
(Adoxa)
— senecionis, Lib.
— glomerata, Grev.
UREDINEAE (cmt.)
Puccinia arenariae (Schum.) (P.
moehringiae, Fckl.)
— chrysosplenii, Grev. On
golden saxifrage (Chryso-
ipknium alternifiRuni)
— valantiae, Pers. On GaRum
cruciata
— malvacearum, Mont.
— circaeae, Pers.
— veronicarum, DC.
— glechomatis, DC.
— cardui, Plowr. (P. syngene-
siarum, Link.)
— buxi, DC.
Triphragmium ulmariae (Schum.)
(T. and Uromyces ulma-
riae, LeV.). On meadow-
sweet (Spiraea Ulmaria)
Phragmidium tormentillae, Fckl.
(P. obtusatum, Fr., Uredo
potentillarum, DC.). On
strawberry, barren straw-
berry, etc.
— rubi (Pers.) (P. bulbosum,
Fr., Lecythea ruborum,
Lev.)
Phragmidium subcorticatum
(Schrank.). (P. mucro-
natum, Fr., Coleosporium
pingue, Lev., Lecythea
rosae, Lev.)
— rubi-idaei (Pers.) (P. gra-
cile, Berk.)
Xenodochus carbonarius,Schlecht.
(X. carbonarius and Lecy-
thea poterii, LeV.)
Gymnosporangium sabinae
(Dicks.). (Roestelia can-
cellata, Reb.) On pear
— clavariaeforme (Jacq.). (Roe-
stelia lacerata, Tul.). On
hawthorn
— juniperinum (Linn.). (Roe-
stelia cornuta, Tul.). On
mountain ash
Melampsora helioscopiae (Pers.)
(M. euphorbiae, Cast.,
Lecythea euphorbiae, Lev.)
— lini (Pers.). (Lecythea lini,
Berk.). On Linum cathar-
ticum
— farinosa (Pers.). (M. salicina,
Lev., Lecythea caprearum,
Berk.)
— epitea, Thum. (Lecythea
epitea, LeV.)
— mixta (Schlecht.). (Lecy-
thea mixta, Schlecht.)
— vitellinae (DC.). (Lecythea
saliceti, Lev.)
— tremulae, Tul.
— populina Qacq.) (M. popu-
lina and Lecythea populina,
Lev.)
73
UREDINEAE («»/.)
Melampsora hypericorum (DC.)
(Uredo hypericorum, DC.)
— betulina (Pers.)
— circaeae (Schum.). On Cir-
•caea lutetiana
Coleosporium senecionis (Pers.)
(Peridermium pini, Chev.,
on fir. Col. senecionis
on Senecio lyhaticus)
— sonchi (Pers.). (C. sonchi-
arvensis, LeV., C. tussila-
ginis, Lev., C. petasitis,
Lev.). On Soncbus, Tussi-
lago, and Petasites
— campanulae (Pers.) On
Campanula rotundifofia
Uredo quercus, Brond. Sher-
wood Forest (Brittain)
Caeomamercurialis(Pers.). (Ure-
do confluens. DC.) On
Mercurialis perennis
^Ecidium grossulariae (Gmel.)
— periclymeni, Schum.
— punctatum, Pers. (Aec.
quadrifidum DC.). On
a garden anemone
— leucospermum, DC. On
Anemone nemorosa
USTILAGINEAE
Ustilago longissima (Sow.)
- hypodytes, Fr.
— segetum (Bull.) (U. carbo,
Tul.)
- bromivora, Waldh.
— • utriculosa, Tul.
— violacca (Pers.). (U. anther-
arum, Fr.)
Tilletia tritici (Bjerk.) (T. caries,
Tul.)
Urocystis agropyri (Preuss.)
— anemones (Pers.)
— violae (Sow.)
Entyloma ranunculi (Bon.)
(Gloeosporium ficariae
Berk.)
Tubercinia scabies, Berk. On
potatoes
MYXOMYCETES '
Ceratiomyxa mucida, Schroeter
Badhamia hyalina, Berk.
— utricularis, Berk.
— panicea, Rost.
1 This list is drawn up from the
material collected in Sherwood Forest
by the members of the British Myco-
logical Society, and by the present
writer chiefly in the neighbourhood of
Nottingham. A few north Notts,
records by Messrs. Bohler and Friend
are also included.
10
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
MYXOMYCETES (com.)
Physarum nutans, Pers., and
var. leucophaeum (Fr.)
Craterium pedunculatum, Trent.
Diachaea elegans, Fr.
Didymium difforme, Duby
— farinaceum, Schrad.
— nigripes, Fr., and
var. xanthopus (Fr.)
— effusum, Link.
Spumaria alba, DC.
MYXOMYCETES («»/.)
Stemonitis fusca, Roth
Comatricha obtusata, Preuss.
Brefeldia maxima, Rost.
Cribraria intricata, Schrad.
Tubulina fragiformis, Pers.
Reticularia Lycoperdon, Bull.
Trichia favoginea, Pers.
— scabra, Rost. (Massee, Man.
Myx., p. 192.)
— varia, Pers.
MYXOMYCETES (coat.)
Trichia fallax, Pers.
— Botrytis, Pers.
Hemitrichia Serpula, Rost.
Arcyria punicea, Pers.
— incarnata, Pers.
— flava, Pers.
Prototrichia flagellifera, Rost
(Massee, Man. Myx., p.
130.)
Lycogala miniatum, Pers.
ZOOLOGY
MOLLUSCS
The soil of Nottinghamshire is not as a whole favourable to the de-
velopment of molluscan life, the bed-rock of the greater portion being
sandstone, while the drifts that cover it are not particularly rich in car-
bonate of lime. Along the western borders of the county, however,
where the Permian limestones occur, the land-snails are abundant ;
whilst the streams everywhere, and especially the canals, are rich in fresh-
water forms.
Altogether 108 species, out of the 139 known to occur in the
British Isles, have been recorded, and one or two more may yet be looked
for.
In this list Hygromia revelata is not included ; the record of examples
said to have been found at Stanton-on-the- Wolds by Mr. E. J. Lowe
being obviously due to some error of observation. Pomatias elegans is also
omitted as not indigenous now, though a single subfossil example was
found at Scarthing Moor in a superficial deposit. Limncea glabra has been
inserted, though there is some doubt as to its actual occurrence at the
present day, only a single specimen having been met with. Some forms,
which have only been found in the rejectamenta of streams, are added
because they are all small species not easily found and probably occur
living in the area.
One of these last, Acantbinula lamellata^ is an interesting species that
once spread as far south as the Channel, it having been found in a pleisto-
cene deposit at West Wittering on the coast of Hampshire, but to-day it
does not occur further south than Reading, in the neighbourhood of
which a single example was found a short time ago. The occurrence
of this pretty little species imparts a slightly northern quality to the
otherwise typically British assemblage.
An introduction of note is Stenogyra goodalli^ a West Indian form
that occurs in hot-houses where it has been introduced in the soil with
plants. It was first observed in this country and described from hot-
houses at Bristol by Miller ; it has since been found at Kew Gardens
and in nurseries in other parts of the country. Mr. Pearson obtained it
at Chilwell near Nottingham feeding on the roots of the bulbs of
Eucbaris.
Two other introductions were obtained in 1883 from Mr. Thacker's
orchid house on Blue Bell Hill, Nottingham, where they occurred
plentifully in moss around orchids.
75
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
The one is an Opeas, a form closely allied to Sfenogyra, and is very
likely the 0. c/avu/us, Per., of Mauritius, while the other is Zonitoides
minusculus, a widely distributed North American and West Indian form.
The literature on the molluscan fauna of Nottinghamshire is some-
what scattered and spread over many years, but the two latest papers,
which collect very nearly all previous information on the subject, are
those by Mr. W. A. Gain (British Naturalist, 1893) and Mr. B. Sturges
Dodd (in A Contribution to the Geology and Natural History of Nottingham-
shire, 8vo, 1893).
A. GASTROPODA
I. PULMONATA
a. STYLOMMATOPHORA
Testacella matigii, Fer. Welbeck
— baliotldca, Drap. Carlton-on-Trent
— scutu/um, Sby. Welbeck Abbey gardens
Limax maximuSj Linn.
— flavus, Linn.
— arborum, Bouch.-Chant.
Agriolimax agrestis (Linn.)
— laruis (Mull.)
Amalia sowerbii (Fer.) Highfield House, near
Nottingham
— gagatfs (Drap.) Tuxford
Vitrina pellucida (Mttll.)
Vitrea crystallina (Mttll.)
- alliaria (Miller)
— glabra (Brit. Auct.)
— cellaria (Mttll.)
— nitidula (Drap.)
— pura (Aid.)
— radiatula (Aid.)
— excavata (Bean) Clifton ; Attenborough —
— nitida (Mttll.)
— fuha (Mttll.)
Arion ater (Linn.)
— circumicriptus, John. Hunger Hill Gar-
dens, Nottingham
— subfuscm (Drap.) Tuxford ; West Mark-
ham
Punctum pygnueum (Drap.)
Pyramidula rupestris (Drap.)
— rotundata (Mall.)
HeKcella virgata (Da C.)
— itala (Linn.) Newark ; Stanton ; Al-
verton ; Gotham
— caperata (Mont.)
— cantiana (Mont.) Near Newark ; Stanton
Hygromia fusca (Mont.) Rare : Highfield
House estate
— granulata (Aid.)
— hispida (Linn.)
— rufescens (Penn.) Rare : Highfield House
estate
76
Acantbinula aculeata (Mttll.)
— lamellata (JefF.) Rejectamenta of stream
near Mansfield
Vallonla pukhella (Mttll.)
Helidgona lapidda (Linn.) Debdale, Mans-
field ; Cresswell Crags ; etc.
— arbustorum (Linn.)
Helix aspersa, Mttll.
— nemoralh, Linn.
— hortensis, Mall.
Bu/iminus obscurus (Mttll.)
Cochlicopa lubrica (Mull.)
Azeca tridens (Pult.) Rare ; Pleasley Vale ;
Highfield House estate ; Cresswell Crags
Ctecllianella acicula (Mttll.)
Pupa secale, Drap. Nottingham Castle
— angllca (F6r.) Grives Wood, Kirkby-
in-Ashfield ; Highfield House
— cylindracea (Da C.)
— muscorum (Linn.)
Spbyradtum edentulum (Drap.)
Vertigo antivertigo (Drap.)
tubstriata (JefF.) Rare : Haggonfields,
Worksop ; Bingham Moor ; Highfield
House estate ; Cresswell
— pygm<zo (Drap.)
— moulinsiana (Dup.) Crowhill, Mansfield ;
rejectamenta, Carlton-on-Trent ; Darl-
ton (one dead specimen)
— pusi//a, Mttll. Cresswell ; rejectamenta,
Carlton-on-Trent and Bingham Moor ;
Highfield House
— angustior, JefF. Cresswell ; rejectamenta,
Carlton-on-Trent and Bingham Moor ;
Scarthing Moor
Balea perversa (Linn.) Local
Clausilia laminata (Mont.) Local and rare
Cresswell ; Pleasley Vale
— bidentata (Strom.)
Succinea putris (Linn.)
— elegans, Risso.
b. BASOMMATOPHORA
Carychium minimum, Mttll.
Ancylus fuviatilis, Mttll.
MOLLUSCS
Velletia lacustrts (Linn.)
Limntea aurlcularia (Linn.)
— pereger (Mull.)
— palustris (Mull.)
— truneatula (Mall.)
— stagnalis (Linn.)
— glabra (Mttll.) One specimen from river
Leen, Bulwell
Amphipeplea glutinosa (Mull.) Pond between
Beeston and Attenborough ; Beeston
Lock, in backwater of Trent
Planorbis corneus (Linn.)
— albus, Mall.
— glaber, Jeff. Thoresby Lake ; Clumber ;
Cresswell
— nautileus (Linn.)
- carlnatus, Mall.
— marginatuS) Drap.
— vortex (Linn.)
— spirarb'tSy Mull.
Planorbis contortus (Linn.)
— fontanus (Lightf.)
— lineatus (Walker) Oxton ; Highfield
House Lake
Physa fontlnalis (Linn.)
— hypnorum (Linn.) Beeston Rylands ; Wil-
ford ; Lenton Meadows ; Worksop
II. PROSOBRANCHIATA
Bithynia tentaculata (Linn.)
— leachii (Shepp.)
Vivipara vivipara (Linn.)
— contecta (Millett) Dyke, Notts side of
river Idle
Valvata piscina/is (Mall.)
— cristata, Mall. Local
Aclcula lineata (Drap.) Rejectamenta, Cress-
well Crags
Neritina fluviatllh (Linn.)
B. PELECYPODA
Dreissensia polymorpha (Pall.)
Unto pictorum (Linn.)
— tumidus, Retz.
Anodonta cygneea (Linn.)
Sph&rium rivlcola (Leach)
— corneum (Linn.)
— ovale (F^r.) Nottingham Canal ; Marn-
ham
— lacuitre (Mall.)
Pisldium amnicum (Mall.)
— pusillum (Gmel.)
— nitidum, Jenyns.
— fontinale (Drap.) Besides the type, the
var. hendowiana occurs at Retford and
Shireoaks, and the var. pulchella at
Beeston, Stanton and Thoresby Lake
— mlllum (Held.) Clumber Lake ; Mans-
field ; Attenborough
77
INSECTS
APTERA
The insects belonging to this order are small, soft-bodied, wingless creatures with no meta-
morphosis, and exhibiting throughout life a very general resemblance to the larval stage of many
insects of higher groups. The antennae are often large, and while all possess the three pairs of
thoracic legs characteristic of insects in general, some have in addition short limb-like abdominal
appendages and a pair of long bristle-like processes at the hind end of the body. Others are
provided with a pair of abdominal appendages modified into a springing or leaping apparatus ; many
possess on the under side of the first abdominal segment a peculiar structure of doubtful function,
known as the ventral tube; and some again have the body thickly clothed with scales, very similar
to those of Lepidoptera.
The order Aptera comprises the two sub-orders Thysanura (bristle-tails) and Collembola (spring-
tails). The Thysanura have the abdomen divided into ten segments, some of which — the number
varies in different genera — bear short paired limb-like appendages, while the last segment has a pair
of processes or cerci which are generally long, slender, many-jointed, and antenna-like, but in
one family form a pair of forceps somewhat like those of earwigs. A single median tail appendage,
similar to the cerci, occurs in some forms.
Of the five recorded British species of Thysanura four have occurred in Nottinghamshire.
The best known of these is the common and active little ' silver fish ' (Lephma sacckarina),
found commonly in kitchens and bakehouses in Nottingham and elsewhere. Lephma (or Thermobia)
domestica has recently (November, 1 904) been sent to me from West Bridgford, Nottingham, where
it occurs in abundance among cinders under fire-grates in a dwelling-house. The curious Campodea
stapbylinus, a tiny white fragile insect suggesting a minute Myriapod in appearance and movements,
is found very frequently under stones and logs and among damp loose soil in gardens and fields
throughout the county. Mach'llis polypoda is common under stones in quarries throughout the whole
of the Magnesian Limestone district. The remaining British species, Machilh marittma, is confined
to the coast, where it occurs under stones at and above high-water mark.
The Collembola have only six abdominal segments, the first of these bearing a ventral tube or
papilla from which in some species a pair of long delicate tubes or vesicles can be protruded. The
function of this ventral tube is far from being satisfactorily settled. It has been suggested that it
may assist the insect to adhere to smooth vertical surfaces, or may be a respiratory organ. The
'spring' is situated on the under side of the fourth or fifth segment of the abdomen, and consists of
a basal unpaired portion and two free limbs. When not in use the spring lies parallel with the
body, with the limbs or prongs pointing forward, and, in some genera at least, is kept in place by
a ' catch ' situated on the third abdominal segment. When the catch is removed the elastic spring
suddenly extends, so that the limbs now point backward, and the insect is thus shot into the air.
Besides this mode of progression by successive rapid leaps, most of the Collembola can run actively.
In some springtails the body is clothed with hairs, in others with flattened scales. The colour
varies considerably, some species being pure white, others black, while various bright — often metallic
— tints occur, and some species are beautifully variegated. They occur abundantly under bark,
rotten wood, stones, amongst moss and foliage, in damp earth, etc. A few inhabit the surface of
stagnant water, and one species at least is confined to the sea-shore. Their food appears to consist
chiefly of decaying vegetable matter, but several species have recently attracted notice by their injuries
to the roots and other parts of cultivated plants. Unlike the Thysanura, the Collembola are not
at all intolerant of cold, and may be collected throughout the winter. Several species indeed occur
in Spitsbergen, in Franz Josef Land, and on the Antarctic continent.
Extensive materials for a list of Nottinghamshire Collembola exist in the writer's collection,
but as they have not yet been worked out no detailed account of them can be given here. The
following species have, however, been identified by Professor G. H. Carpenter in material submitted
to him.
1 The nomenclature and arrangement adopted for the orders of insects are those of Dr. Sharp in the
Camb. Nat. Hist.
79
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
SMINTHURIDAE ENTOMOBRYIDAE (continued)
Sminthurus viridis (Linn.). Ollertm Orchesella cincta (Linn.). Very common everywhere
Papirius cursor, Lubb. Wollaton — villosa (Geoff.). Rather widely distributed and
— ornatus, Nic. Oxton Bogs ; Strelley ; Arnold not uncommon
— minutus (O. Fabr.). Oxton Bogs Isotoma viridis, Bourlet. Common and widely dis-
tributed
ENTOMOBRYIDAE — palustris (Mall.). Nottingham ; Day brook ; Best-
Tomocerus vulgaris (Tullb.). Bulwell Wood «">°<* P«rk ; Burton Joyce
— tridentiferus (Tullb.). Generally distributed and — nrnetaria (Linn.). Nottingham, under flower-pots
very common 'n garden
Lepidocyrtus curvicollis, Bourlet. Nottingham (in
cellar of house) ACHORUTIDAE
— lanugmosus (Gmel.). Widmerpool ; Burton Joyce,
etc. Achorutes viaticus (Linn.).1)
etc. Achorutes viaticus (Linn.). ^ ., , , , .
/r_ ... . „ .. T. L i /T • \ I Abundant under a board
cyaneus (Tullb.). Strelley. Lipura ambulans (Linn.). } .
L • i- /T • \ \ • • T> nu in a garden at Bramcote
tomobrya nivahs (Linn.). ^ ... .. ,. ., , — mermis, Tullb. )
— muscorum (Nic.). I AU generaiy di ited Neannii mnKornm (Temri.) Mapperley Park ; Bas-
. .. . v „,'„, . and fairly common ,. , \ r / rr j
— multifasciata (Tullb.). ) ' ford, etc.
ORTHOPTERA
The British insects of this order belong to the families Forficulldae (Earwigs), Blattidae
(Cockroaches), Acridiidae (Grasshoppers), Locustidae (Green Grasshoppers), and Gryllidae (Crickets).
The remarkable Praying insects (Mantidae) and Stick and Leaf insects (Phasmidae\ which also
belong to this order, are unrepresented in the British Islands. In Nottinghamshire the Orthoptera
have hitherto received very little attention, and only sixteen species are on record for the county.
Even of this small number we can only claim ten as truly native species, all our local Blattidae
having been introduced by human agency. We have two members of the Forficulidae, the common
and the lesser earwigs. The former is strictly nocturnal in its habits, and is remarkable for the fact
that although possessed of most beautiful and elaborate wings it apparently rarely or never uses them,
while the lesser earwig may often be seen flying freely in the daylight. The truly British species
of Cockroaches, belonging to the genus Ectobia, are only three in number, and none of these have
so far been detected in Nottinghamshire. They are relatively small insects found among dry leaves
and moss and about the undergrowth in woods. The other species which are found here attach
themselves to human habitations, greenhouses, and other places where artificial warmth is provided ;
of these the common cockroach or ' black-beetle,' found only too abundantly in kitchens and bake-
houses, is the most familiar ; but several other species occur, having been introduced with vegetable
or other produce from abroad.
The Grasshoppers (Acridiidae] are also well-known insects, both on account of their jumping
powers and their cheerful chirping notes ; we possess most of the commoner species. Two species
of the migratory locusts (Acridium aegyptlum and Schistocerca peregrma) have occurred in the county,
the latter apparently as a voluntary immigrant, the former as a mere casual imported with fruit.
On the other hand, the Locustidae and Gryllidae are very poorly represented in Nottinghamshire,
only two species of the former and one of the latter group having as yet been found.
A nearly complete list with localities and authorities is given by Mr. Eland Shaw in the
Entomologist's Monthly Magazine for April, 1903, and forms the basis of the list which follows.
FORFICULIDAE
Earwigs
Labia minor, Linn. Nottingham and RetforJ districts
Forficula auricularia, Linn. This, the common earwig, is abundant everywhere
BLATTIDAE
Cockroaches
Periplaneta americana, Linn. Worksop (J. T. Hough- Stylopyga decorata, Brunner. This handsome species
ton) — an accidental importation — has been taken at
— australasiae, Fab. In greenhouses at Wiseton Worksop by Mr. J. T. Hough ton
(E. Shaw) Panchlora exoleta, Klug. Nottingham and Worksop,
Stylopyga orientalis. The common cockroach or I9°3 » probably brought from the West Indies
' black-beetle ' is abundant in bananas
80
Stenobothrus viridulus, Linn.
— bicolor, Charp.
— parallelus, Zett.
Gomphocerus maculatus, Thunb.
INSECTS
ACRIDIIDAE
Grasshoppers
All of these have and is supposed to have been imported with
been taken in bananas from the Canary Isles
various localities, Schistocerca peregrina, Oliv. This North African
and are probably locust visited England in 1869, and was
common through- taken in many English counties, including
out the county. Nottinghamshire. (Roebuck in Naturalist,
Acridium aegyptium, Linn. A fine specimen of this, 1876— 7, p. izgetseq.)
the largest of the European Acridiidae, was Tettix bipunctatus, Linn. Burton Joyce and Ret-
captured in Nottingham market-place in 1902, ford
LOCUSTIDAE
Green or Long-horned Grasshoppers
Leptophyes punctatissima, Bosc. N. and S. Leverton ; Tresviell Wood ; Colston Bassett
Meconema varium, Fab. Aspley and Tresivell Woods
GRYLLIDAE
Crickets
Gryllus domesticus, Linn. The common cricket occurs in houses in Nottingham and Retford (and doubtless
elsewhere)
NEUROPTERA
This order, as usually defined, is a somewhat heterogeneous assemblage of insects which are
provided in most cases with two pairs of thin semi-transparent membranous wings with net-like
venation. It includes among others the Stone-flies [Perlldae\ Dragon-flies (Odonata), May-flies
(Ephemeridae), Alder-flies and Snake-flies (Sia/idaej, Scorpion-flies (Panorpidae), Lacewing-flies
(Hemerobiidae), and Caddis-flies (Trichapttra).
The Stone-flies may be known by the long narrow fore-wings and the much larger and
broader hind-wings which are folded in repose. The larvae are aquatic, and found chiefly in
swiftly-running streams and about waterfalls ; hence we have very few species in Nottinghamshire,
where such conditions scarcely exist. The Dragon-flies are perhaps the best known of the
Neuroptera, owing to their conspicuous colouring and rapid flight while hawking for insects in the
sunshine. They are easily recognized by their large and very mobile head with tiny, bristle-like
antennae, large eyes, long slender abdomen, and wings of nearly equal size, which have a transparent
glassy appearance and cannot be folded when the insect is at rest. About a dozen species have been
taken in the county. In the May-flies the fore-wings are very much larger than the hind-wings,
which indeed are sometimes wanting ; the venation is very close and complex ; the antennae are
very small, and the body bears at its hinder extremity two or three very long slender tails. The
larvae are aquatic, but unlike the exclusively carnivorous stone-flies and dragon-flies their food is
largely vegetable. The adult insect takes no food during its brief life.
The Alder-flies (Sialides) have a squarish head, bearing a pair of rather long antennae ; the
wings are similar in character, the hinder pair being rather the smaller ; in repose they meet
together over the back like a roof, after the fashion of those of a noctuid moth. The larvae are
aquatic and carnivorous. Stalls tutaria, a sober-looking insect with black body and pale brown
wings, is very common amongst the vegetation about canals, slow streams, and ponds. The Snake-
flies (Raphidiides) are easily recognized by the long constricted neck formed by the elongation of the
prothorax and hinder part of the head. The larvae are terrestrial, living in rotten wood and feeding
upon other insects. The Scorpion-flies (Panorpa) are distinguished by the prominent beak-like
prolongation of the head, and — in the males — by the terminal segments of the abdomen being
curved up like the tail of a scorpion. The antennae are long and slender, and the wings narrow
and shining. The fore-wings are only slightly larger than the others. The larvae are terrestrial,
very similar to those of the Saw-flies, and as well as the flies are carnivorous. The Hemeroiiidae,
to which family the beautiful Lace-wing flies or ' golden eyes ' (Chrysopa) belong, are useful insects,
inasmuch as the larvae feed exclusively on aphides or ' green fly,' whose juices they suck. The
larvae of some of the species of both Hemerobius and Chrysopa have the curious habit of covering
themselves with the empty skins of the aphides that they have sucked dry.
The Caddis-flies have the wings clothed with hairs, a feature which at once distinguishes them
from all other Neuroptera 5 in repose the wings meet at an angle, roof-like, over the back, and this
i 81 ii
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
attitude combined with their hairy covering gives the insects a moth-like appearance. The hind-
wings are rather shorter but broader than the fore-wings, and have a folding anal area. The
antennae are many-jointed, long, and slender. Caddis-flies have very feeble powers of flight, and
are never found far from water. The larvae are aquatic and inhabit cases, constructed by them-
selves, of small stones or shells, grains of sand, bits of stems and leaves of water-plants, etc. ; their
food is mainly vegetable, but they are probably insect-eaters also.
The species enumerated in the subjoined lists have all been collected recently in Nottingham-
shire, mostly by the Rev. Alfred Thornley (A.T.), Mr. Eland Shaw (E.S.), Miss Alderson (E.M.A.),
Mr. J. T. Houghton (J.T.H.), and the present writer (J.W.C.). Very little attention has hitherto
been given to these insects, and many more species will doubtless be added in the near future.
NEUROPTERA-AMPHIBIOTICA
PERLIDAE
Chloroperla grammatica, Poda. Clumber (S. Pegler)
Nemoura variegata, Oliv. North and South Leverton
and Treswell Wood (A. T. and E. S.)
— meyeri, Pict. S. Leverton (A. T.)
— cinerea, Oliv. Worksop (E. M. A.) ; Bulwell
(J.W.C.)
ODONATA
Sympetrum striolatum, Charp. Retford, Treswell Wood
(A- T.)
Libellula depressa, Linn. S. Leverton, Treswell Wood
(A. T.) ; Widmerpool, Longford Moor (J. W. C.)
- quadrimaculata, Linn. N. Leverton (E. S.)
Aeschna cyanea, Mull. Treswell, S. Leverton, Stoke-
ham (A. T.) ; SMreoaks (J. T. H.)
- grandis, Linn. Chllwell (J. W. C.)
Calopteryx virgo, Linn. Rainworth Water (Rev. F.
C. R. Jourdain)
— splendens, Harr. Treswell Wood (E. S.) ; Cottam,
Rampton, Littlebonugh, Wollaton (J. W. C.)
ODONATA (continued)
Pyrrhosoma nymphula, Sulz. Treswell Wood (A. T.) ;
Shireoaks (J. T. H.)
Ischnura elegans, Lind. Retford, S. Leverton (A. T.) ;
Saundby (E. S.) ; Shireoaks (J. T. H.) ; Not-
tingham district, common (J. W. C.)
Agrion pulchellum, Lind. Saundby (E. S.)
— puella, Linn. Common in the Retford (A. T. and
E. S.), Worksop (J. T. H.), and Nottingham
(J.W.C.) districts
Enallagma cyathigerum, Charp. Shireoaks and Welleck
(E. M. A.)
EPHEMERIDAE
Ephemera vulgata, Linn. Canal at Babtvorth (J. W. C.)
- danica, Mtlll. Gonalston, Ollerton (J. W. C.)
Cloeon dipterum, Linn. A', and S. Leverton (A. T.)
— simile, Etn. Osberton (E. S.) ; Cossall (J. W. C.)
Baetis vernus, Curt. Clifton Grove, near Nottingham
(J.W.C.)
NEUROPTERA-PLANIPENNIA
SIALIDES
HEMEROBIIDAE (continued)
Sialis lutaria, Linn. Retford (A. T.) ; N. Leverton,
Cottam (E. S.) ; Wollaton, Cossall, Trowell, Bul-
viell, etc., common (J. W. C.)
- fuliginosa, Pict. Eaton (J. W. C.)
Raphidia notata, Fab. Clumber (E. M. A.) ; Tres-
viell Wood (A. T.) ; Sherwood Forest (Rev. W.
Becher)
— xanthostigma, Schum. Worksop (E. M. A.) ;
Treswell Wood (A. T.) ; LangfordMoor Q. W. C.)
HEMEROBIIDAE
HEMEROBIIDES
Micromus paganus, Linn. Treswell Wood (A. T.) ;
Shireoaks (J. T. H.) ; Clumber (E. M. A.)
Hemerobius elegans, Steph. Burton Joyce (J. W. C.) ;
Worksop (E.M.A.)
— micans, Oliv. N. and S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Tres-
well Wood (E. S.) ; Clumber and Shireoaks
(E.M.A.)
— humuli, Linn. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Treswell
Wood (E. S.) ; Wotksop (J. T. H.) ; Clumber
(E. M. A.)
— stigma, Steph. Worksop (E. M. A.)
— subnebulosus, Steph. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Work-
top (J. T. H.) ; Nottingham (J. W. C.)
— nervosus, Fab. 5. Leverton (A. T.) ; Shireoaks
(J. T. H.) ; Worksop (E. M. A.)
CHRYSOPIDES
Chrysopa flava, Scop.
— alba, Linn.
N. and S. Leverton, Treswell
Wood (A. T. and E. S.) ;
Shireoaks Q.T.H.); Work-
top (E. M. A.)
Shireoaks (J. T. H.) ; Worksop
S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Shireoaks
N. Leverton (E. S.) ;
Nottingham (J.W.C.);
— tenella, Schnd.
(E. M. A.)
— vulgaris, Schnd.
a- T. HO
— septempunctata, Wesm.
Shireoaks (J. T. H.) ;
Worksop (E. M. A.)
— aspersa, Wesm. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Worksop
(E. M. A.)
— ventralis, Curt. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Shireoaks
(J.T. H.)
— phyllochroma, Wesm. Shireoaks (J. T. H.)
— perla, Linn. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Treswell Wood
(E. S.) ; LangfordMoor, Budby Carr 0-W.C.);
Shireoaks (E. M. A.)
PANORPIDAE
Panorpa communis, Linn. S. Leverton, Treswell Wood
(A. T.) ; Worktop (E. M. A.) ; Strelley, etc.
(J.W.C.)
— germanica, Linn.
S. Leverton,
(A. T.) ; Sherwood Forest, in
Annesley (J. W. C.)
Treswell Wood
many places ;
82
INSECTS
TRICHOPTERA
INAEQUIPALPIA
PHRYGANEIDAE
Worksop (J. T. H.) ; Wid-
Shireoaks (J. T. H.) ; Ret-
Neuronia ruficrus, Scop.
merpool (J. W. C.)
Phryganea grandis, Linn.
ford (A. T.)
— varia, Fab. Shireoaks (J. T. H.)
LlMNOPHILIDAE
Grammotaulius atomarius, Fab. N. and S. Leverton
(E. S.); Shireoaks (J. T. H.) ; Well™ (J. W. C.)
Glyphotaelius pellucidus, Retz. S. Leverton, Treswell
(E. S.)
Limnophilus rhombicus, Linn. Shireoaks (J. T. H.)
— flavicornis, Fab. S. Leverton (E. S.)
— marmoratus, Curt. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Shireoaks
(J. T. H.)
— lunatus, Curt. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; TV. Leverton,
Cotton (E. S.) ; Shireoaks (J. T. H.)
— politus, McLach. Cottam(E.S.'); Worksop (£..M. A.)
— vittatus, Fab. S. Leverton, Treswell Wood (A. T.) ;
N. Leverton (E. S.)
— affinis, Curt. S. Leverton (A. T.)
— auricula, Curt. N. and S. Leverton (A. T.) ;
Shireoaks (J. T. H.) ; £<?»*//<;» (E. S.)
— extricatus, McLach. Worksop (E. M. A.)
— hirsutus, Pict. Shireoaks (J. T. H.)
— sparsus, Curt. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Tresviell Wood
(E. S.) ; S/S/raw/tr (J. T. H.)
— fuscicornis, Ramb. Burton Joyce (J. W. C.)
Anabolia nervosa (Leach) Curt. Retford, S. Leverton
(A. T.) ; Edwinstowe (E.S.) ; Shireoaks (J.T. H.)
Stenophylax stellatus, Curt. Shireoaks (J. T. H.)
— permistus, McLach. S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Epper-
stonePark (J. W. C.)
— concentricus, McLach. Worksop (E. M. A.)
Micropterna sequax, McLach. S. Leverton (A. T.)
Halesus radiatus, Curt. Worksop (J. T. H.) ; Edwin-
stowe (E. S.)
SERICOSTOMATIDAE
Notidobia ciliaris, Linn. By canal, Trowell (J. W. C.)
Goera pilosa, Fab. Shireoaks (J. T. H.) ; Fiskerton,
(J.W.C.)
INAEQUIPALPIA (continued)
SERICOSTOMATIDAE (continued)
Silo pallipes, Fab. Misterton (A. T.) ; Worksop
(E. M. A.) ; Teversall (J. W. C.)
Brachycentrus subnubilus, Curt. Retford (A. T.)
AEQUIPALPIA
LEPTOCERIDAE
Molanna angustata, Curt. Clumber Park (E. S.)
Odontocerum albicorne, Scop. Shireoaks (J. T. H.)
Leptocerus albo-guttatus, Hag. Burton Joyce (J. W. C.)
— aterrimus, Steph. Rampton (E. S.) ; Shireoaks
(J. T. H.) ; Edwinstowe, Annesley (J. W. C.)
— cinereus, Curt. West Drayton (E. S.) ; Worksop
(J. T. H.) ; Burton Joyce (J. W. C.)
— albifrons, Linn. West Drayton (E. S.)
— bilineatus, Linn. Rampton (E. S.)
Mystacides azurea, Linn. Retford (A. T.) ; W. Dray-
ton (E. S.)
— longicornis, Linn. W. Drayton (E. S.) ; Worksop
(E. M. A.) ; Cow//,
(J,W. C.)
HYDROPSYCHIDAE
Hydropsyche instabilis, Curt. Worksop district
0- T. H.)
— angustipennis, Curt. Retford (A. T.) ; Rampton,
Cottam (E. S.) ; Worksop (E. M. A.) ; Radcliffe-
on-Trent, Bunny (J. W. C.)
— guttata, Pict. Marnham (A.T.) ; Burton Joyce,
Fiskerton, Nottingham (J.W.C.)
Plectrocnemia conspersa, Curt. Worksop district
(J. T. H.)
Polycentropus flavomaculatus, Pict. Retford (E. S.) ;
Radcliffe-on-Trent, Burton Joyce (J. W. C.)
Cyrnus trimaculatus, Curt. West Drayton (E. S.)
Tinodes waeneri, Linn. Worksop and Shireoaks
(J. T. H.) ; Osberton (E. S.)
HYDROPTILIDAE
Agraylea multipunctata, Curt. Rampton (E. S.)
Hydroptila maclachlani, Klap. Burton Joyce, under
stones on margin of R. Trent (J. W. C.)
HYMENOPTERA
The order Hymenoptera is one of enormous extent, including the ants, bees and wasps, saw-
flies, gall-flies, ruby-wasps, ichneumons, etc. They possess two pairs of membranous wings which
are destitute of scales and more or less transparent ; the anterior wings are larger than the posterior.
In some species, however, one or both of the sexes may be apterous. The females are in some
families provided with a sting, in others with a sawing, boring, or piercing apparatus. In the
sawflies the abdomen is broad at the base where it joins the thorax, and there is no sharp distinction
between the two regions, the lateral outline of the body being therefore continuous ; but in the
other groups the base of the abdomen is suddenly contracted into a slender ' waist ' or petiole of
varying length in different species. These differences are utilized as a means of dividing the order
into two sub-orders : the Sessiliventres, in which the thorax passes almost imperceptibly into the
abdomen, and the Petiolata, in which there is a deep constriction between them, and the transition
is therefore abrupt and sharply defined.1 This difference in structure is accompanied by striking
1 The expressions ' thorax ' and ' abdomen ' are here used in a somewhat loose sense. In the Petiolate
Hymenoptera the first segment of the abdomen is completely fused with the thorax, and the ' waist ' or stalk
is formed by the second (and sometimes the third) abdominal segment. The petiole or constriction is there-
fore, strictly speaking, not between the thorax and abdomen, but behind the first segment of the latter. It is
usual to speak of the thorax, plus the first abdominal segment, as the alitrunk, and to restrict the term abdomen
to the part behind which commences with the true second segment.
83
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
differences in the mode of life of the insects in the two groups. The Sessiliventres or Sawflies are
vegetable feeders ; the larvae mostly resemble the caterpillars of Lepidoptera, and usually feed
exposed on the foliage of plants, while those of the Petiolata are maggot-like and incapable of
obtaining food by their own exertions : a large proportion of them are carnivorous, living as
parasites in the bodies of other insects. A remarkable feature in the economy of the Hymenoptera
is the frequent occurrence of parthenogenesis, i.e. the production of young by the female insect
without the co-operation of a male. While in some cases it may be of only occasional occurrence,
in others, although intermittent, it occurs regularly, and still other species are apparently perpetually
parthenogenetic. Thus in many of the Gall-flies (Cynipidae) a parthenogenetic generation alternates
regularly with a sexual one, and in a few Tenthredinidae and Cynipidae the male insect is entirely
unknown, all the individuals belonging to the female sex, so that reproduction must be entirely
parthenogenetic, and the progeny always wholly female. In some Cynipidae, although the male is
very rare it is occasionally produced, but is probably useless, the virgin females being able to dispense
with the assistance of a male.
On the other hand in some cases of parthenogenesis the progeny is entirely male. The
workers among the social ants, bees, and wasps sometimes lay unfertilized eggs, and these always
give rise to male individuals The same thing occurs with the queen hive-bee before fertilization,
and in some sawflies In a few species of the latter group, however, while the parthenogenetic
broods usually consist entirely of males, a female very occasionally appears. Whatever may be the
meaning of parthenogenesis — and its significance is still very obscure — it appears to tend to the
production of a brood in which the individuals are all of one sex, sometimes male, sometimes female.
Among the higher Hymenoptera (ants, some bees and wasps) a remarkable development of
social life occurs, the individuals of a species living together in great societies consisting mainly of
imperfect females or ' workers ' who perform all the ordinary duties of the community ; they
construct, maintain, and defend the nest, and feed and tend the young. The work of reproduction
is undertaken by a single perfect female known as the queen, or by a small number of such females.
The males are short-lived, and of use only in the fertilization of the queens,
HYMENOPTERA SESSILIVENTRES OR TENTHREDINIDAE
Sawflies
The Sawflies are as a rule sluggish insects with a weak heavy flight which is not long sustained.
They are fond of settling on flowers, especially Umbelliferae, and feed chiefly on pollen ; a few
species, however, devour the small insects frequenting flowers. They all possess in the female sex a
pair of remarkable sawing or piercing instruments which are used to cut or bore into the tissues of
plants in which the eggs are deposited. The larvae are exclusively vegetable feeders ; a few, like
Cephas, which feeds internally in stems of corn, and Sirex, which lives in the solid wood of trees, are
white fleshy grubs ; a few others inhabit galls, or bore into fruits, or mine or roll up leaves ; but the
great majority are caterpillar-like, and feed exposed on plants. These have from six to eight pairs
of prolegs in addition to the three pairs of thoracic legs, whereas a lepidopterous caterpillar never
has more than five pairs of prolegs.
The larvae of some species of sawflies are at times very destructive to crops. Pteronus ribesti
sometimes completely defoliates the gooseberry bushes in gardens, and the slimy slug-like larva of
Eriocampoides limacinus occasionally does much damage to pear and other fruit trees. I have not
heard of any other species causing damage in Nottinghamshire.
Parthenogenesis is very prevalent in this group, as has been repeatedly proved by rearing larvae
from unfertilized eggs laid in confinement by bred females. In nearly all the species females are
much more numerous than males ; indeed in some species males are very rare, and in others quite
unknown. On the other hand the parthenogenetically developed individuals of Pteronus ribesii are
almost always males.
The list of Nottinghamshire sawflies is a somewhat meagre one, and will doubtless be greatly
extended when the group is properly worked. Tenthredopsis thornleyi is interesting as having been
founded by Pastor Konow on specimens collected by the Rev. A. Thornley in Nottinghamshire and
Lincolnshire in May and June, 1897. Nearly all the species enumerated below have been
determined either by Pastor Konow or the Rev. F. D. Morice. Unless otherwise stated they
were all collected by the Rev. A. Thornley or myself.
LYDIDAE LYDIDAE (continued)
Pamphilius sylvaticus, Linn. S. Leverton ; Tresteell Cephus pygmaeus, Linn. S. Leverton ; Trestvell
Wood Wood; Widmerpool, abundant in buttercup
— hortorum, Klug. Trestoell Wood flowers, 23 June, 1900
— depressus, Schrk. S. Leverton Macrocephus linearis, Schrk. Treswell Wood
84
INSECTS
Pnophorus padi, Linn.
SIRICIDAE
Sires juvencus, Linn. Worktop (E. G. Alderson and
J. T. Houghton) ; Chilwell (D. H. Pearson) ;
Nottingham. Probably most of the specimens
of this and the next species captured in the
county have been introduced with foreign
timber
— gigas, Linn. Generally distributed and by no
means rare in the county
TENTHREDINIDAE
Trichiosoma lucorum, Linn. S. Leverton; Bulwell
Forest, bred from larva found on birch
— tibialis, Steph. S. Leverton
Arge enodis, Linn. Treswell Wood
— ustulata, Linn. N. Leverton ; Widmerpool
— cyaneocrocea, Forst. Bagthorpe, Nottingham
Cladius pectinicornis, Fourcr. \ ^ ^^
)
/Bred from galls on osiers,
11 u Wilford (G. B. Rothera) ;
Pontama gallarurn, Htg. L/^ ;es ;s com.
- valhsmem, Htg. K and ^£nml[y dis.
Vtributed
Pteronus myosotidis, Fab. S. Leverton
— ribesii, Scop. Nottingham ; Lowdham ; Worksop,
etc. Often very destructive to gooseberry
bushes
Croesus septentrionalis, Linn. Treswell Wood, larvae
beaten from hazel, September, 1898 ; first
imago emerged 30 May, 1899
Holcocneme lucida, Panz. S. Leverton, not un-
common
Pachynematus trisignatus, FOrst. S. Leverton ; Nott-
ingham
Eriocampoides limacinus, Retz. Wellow, causing
damage to pear trees (Rev. W. Becher)
Hoplocampa testudinea, Klug. S. Leverton
Tomostethus nigritus, Fab. Burton Joyce, one female,
1 8 May, 1899
— ephippium, Panz. Treswell Wood
- fuscipennis, Fall. Treswell Wood
Monophadnus albipes, Gmel. S. Leverton ; Treswell
Wood
Athalia rosae, Linn. Universally distributed and
very common
Selandria serva, Fab. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood ;
Bunny
Stromboceros delicatulus, Fall. Worksop (Miss Alder-
son) ; Treswell Wood
Strongylogaster cingulatus, Fab. Edwlnstowe, common
in the forest amongst bracken
Poecilosoma tridens, Knw. S. Leverton, 7 May,
1898
TENTHREDINIDAE (continued*)
Emphytus succintus, Klug. (togatus, Cam.). Treswell
Wood ; Lit tie borough
— cinctus, Linn. S. Leverton
— calceatus, Klug. Langford Moor, Newark
— tener, Fall, Blldworth
Dolerus madidus, Klug. Retford (S. Pegler)
— pratensis, Fall, (eglanteriae, Klug., fulviventris
Cam.). 'Nottingham; Fuhuood; Thorney ; Sutton,
near Retford
— gonager, Fab. Nottingham ; Southwell; S. Leverton;
Clarborough
— haematodes, Schrk. S. Leverton; Clifton
— aeneus, Htg. Widely distributed and com-
mon
Rhogogastera viridis, Linn. Langford Moor ; Widmer-
pool; Budby ; Treswell Wood; Cottam ; Little-
borough
— lateralis, Fab. Lambley ; 5. Leverton ; Treswell
Wood
— aucupariae, Klug. Nuthall and Bnxtowe (W. H.
Freestone) ; Gedling ; Widmerpool; Annesley
Tenthredopsis litterata, Geoff. Generally distributed
and common ; the female var. cordata at
Strelley
— raddatzi, Knw. Nottingham; Retford; S. Leverton
— dorsal is, Lep. Treswell; N. Leverton
— scutellaris, Panz. Southwell ; Treswell Wood;
S. Leverton
— coqueberti, Klug. 'Nottingham district ; Southwell;
Worksop (Houghton)
— thornleyi, Knw. S. Leverton, two examples
May and June, 1897 (Rev. A. Thornley)
Pachyprotasis rapae, Linn. Strelley ; S. Leverton
Macrophya ribis, Schrk. Edwlnstowe ; S. Leverton
Allantus maculatus, Fourcr. Treswell Wood (Miss
Alderson)
- temulus, Scop. Widely distributed and rather
common
- vespa, Retz. Treswell Wood ; Rampton Marsh
- scrophulariae, Linn. On flowers of Scrophularia
aquatica at Kingston-on-Soar ; Budby ; Bunny ;
W. Burton ; Treswell ; Cottam ; Broadholme ;
Wheat ley, etc.
— arcuatus, Forst. Universally distributed and very
common, generally on flowers of Heracleum
sphondylium ; var. nitidior, Knw., Treswell
Wood
Tenthredo rufiventris, Panz. Langford Moor
— atra, Linn., var. dispar, Klug. S. Leverton
— livida, Linn. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood ; South-
well; Cossall
— solitaria, Scop. Langford Moor
- mesomelaena, Linn. Widely distributed and
common
HYMENOPTERA PETIOLATA
CYNIPIDAE
The Cynipidae are very small hymenopterous insects, usually black or dark in colour, which
according to their mode of life may be divided into three groups : — (i) those whose eggs are laid,
and the resulting larvae feed, in the tissues of a living plant, the presence of the egg or larva usually
resulting in the formation of a ' gall ' — a peculiar abnormal growth in the merismatic tissue of the
plant. The succulent internal substance of the gall furnishes the larva with food. The oak-
apple, marble gall, oak-spangle, and Robin's pincushion or bedeguar gall of the wild rose are familiar
85
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
examples of such galls. (2) Inquilines : uninvited guests which do not themselves originate galls,
though their action tends to modify the normal gall, but lay their eggs in the galls formed by the
members of the first group, the larvae feeding internally upon the substance of the gall. (3) Para-
sites, which have similar habits to those of the ichneumon flies, living and feeding inside the bodies
of other insects, chiefly aphides and the larvae of Diptera.
The Cynipidae are of special interest on account of their varying modes of reproduction. The
parasitic forms are developed from eggs fertilized in the usual manner, and this is also true of some
of the gall-makers and inquilines. In others, however, reproduction is partially or completely
parthenogenetic, the individuals of some species consisting mainly, of others entirely, of females
which produce fertile eggs without the co-operation of a male. But besides parthenogenesis some of
the gall-making species exhibit the phenomenon of ' alternation of generations.' Such species have
a spring brood consisting of males and females, reproducing sexually and giving rise to an autumnal
unisexual or wholly female brood which reproduces parthenogenetically and originates the bisexual
brood of the following spring. The two generations frequently differ so materially in structural
details, and moreover produce galls of such different form and structure, that they were formerly
regarded as totally distinct species and received different names.
The appended list of the gall-making and inquiline Cynipidae of Nottinghamshire is due to
the researches of Mr. G. B. Rothera of Nottingham, who had the advantage of the co-operation
of Mr. E. A. Fitch in the determination of the species. The names bracketed together in pairs
represent respectively the agamic or unisexual, and the sexual generations of those species which
exhibit cyclical reproduction or alternation of generations.
CYNIPIDAE
[List of species bred from the Galls by
G. B. Rothera]
Rhodites eglanteriae, Htg. Forms smooth, round,
pea -like galls on leaves of Rosa canina.
Arnold ; Lenton ; Elton, etc. ; S. Leverton
(Thornley)
— rosae, L. Causes the familiar ' bedeguar ' or ' Robin's
pincushion ' on Rosa canina. Common
— nervosus, Curt. (R. rosarum, Gir.). Gall pea-
shaped, but beset with three to six stout spines,
on leaf of Rosa canina. Trent Lane, Lenton;
Beauvale Woods, August, 1 904 (Carr) ; 5. Lever-
ton, Kingston (Thornley)
— Aulax glechomae, Htg. Forms soft, rounded or
irregular swellings on leaves or stem of Nepeta
glechoma. Linby
— hieracii, Bouch£. Produces large, green, hairy
swellings on the stem of Hieracium
Periclistus brandti, Ratz. Inquiline in galls of
Rhodites rosae (Robin's pincushion)
— caninae, Htg. Inquiline in galls of Rhodites
eglanteriae and R. nervosus
Synergus melanopus, Htg. Inquiline in galls of —
Cynips kollari
- reinhardi, Mayr. Same as last
— tscheki, Mayr. Inquiline in galls of Biorhiza —
terminalis (oak-apples)
— albipes, Htg. Inquiline in, and bred from galls
of, Dryophanta folii, D. divisa, Neuroterus
fumipennis, Andricus curvator, and Trigonaspis
megaptera — all on oak ; also from galls of Cynips
kollari
— facialis, Htg. Inquiline in oak apples (Biorhiza
terminalis) and oak currant galls of Spathegaster
baccarum
— thaumacera, Dal. Inquiline in galls of Trigonaspis
megaptera
Diastrophus rubi, Htg. Forms large irregular fusiform
swellings on stems of brambles. Strelley
Andricus ostreus, Gir. Galls on leaves of Quercus
robur. 'Nottingham forest ; Bulwell Lane, etc.
86
CYNIPIDAE (continued)
Andricus fecundatrix, Htg. (agamic form). Forms the
' artichoke galls ' in oak buds. Ollerton, etc.
- globuli, Htg. (agamic form). Clifton; Rud-
dington; Ollerton
— inflator, Htg. (sexual form). Sherwood1 Lodge.
Galls in leaf-buds of Quercus
— radicis, Fab. (agamic form). Galls on root of
Quercus
— corticis, L. (agamic form). Galls in bark of
Quercus. Mapperley Park, Nottingham
— collaris, Htg. (agamic form). Galls in buds of
Quercus
— curvator, Htg. (sexual form). Galls on leaves of
Quercus. Bulwell Lane
ramuli, Schenck (sexual form). Cottony galls
on catkins of Quercus. Bulwell Lane plantation :
Ruddington
— autumnalis, Htg. (agamic form). Galls in ter-
minal buds of Quercus. Stapleford Hill
— quadrilineatus, Htg. Galls on male catkins of
Quercus
— marginalis, Schlecht. Galls on leaves of Quercus.
Gedling
cirratus, Adi. The agamic form (Andricus calli-
doma, Thorns.) produces stalked galls from leaf-
buds of Quercus. Between Clifton and Ruddington
— albopunctata, Schlecht. Forms green, white-
spotted bud galls on Quercus. Gedling
— glandulae, Schenck. The galls are developed
from lateral buds of Quercus and are clothed
with white silky hairs. Blrklands, Sherwood
Forest
— solitarius, Fonsc. Gall covered with ferruginous
hair, from leaf-buds of Quercus. Ollerton
Cynips kollari, Htg. Forms the familiar spherical
marble-like galls on oak buds. Clifton; Rudding-
ton ; Bulwell Lane, etc., common
Trigonaspis megaptera, Pz. (sexual form). Galls on
roots or trunks of Quercus. Sherwood Forest
— renum, Mayr ( = Biorhiza renum, Gir.) (agamic
form). Forms kidney-shaped galls on leaves of
Quercus. Ollerton
INSECTS
CYNIPIDAE (continued)
Biorhiza terminalis, Fab. (sexual form). Oak-apple gall
on buds of Quercus. Mapperley Park; Bulwell
Lane; Kingston; Southwell; etc., common.
— aptera, Fab. (agamic form). Galls on rootlets of
Quercus. Gedling; Bulwell Lane
Dryophanta folii, Htg. (agamic form). Forms the
' cherry gall ' on leaves of Quercus. Bestviood
Park; Ollerton
— longiventris, Htg. (agamic form). Galls on leaves
of Quercus. Tollerton
— agama, Htg. Galls on leaves of Quercus. Not-
tingham Forest
— divisa, Htg. (agamic form). Galls on leaves of
Quercus. Clifton; Nottingham Forest
Neuroterus lenticularis, Oliv. (agamic form). Origi-
nates the galls known as ' oak spangles ' on
leaves of Quercus. Clifton Spinney ; Birklands
— baccarum, Htg. ( = Spathegaster baccarum) (sexual
form). Forms 'oak currant galls' on catkins
or leaves of Quercus. Nottingham Forest ; Clifton ;
Oxton Wood; Manton Woods, Worksop (Thornley)
CYNIPIDAE (continued)
•Neuroterus fumipennis, Htg. (agamic form). Causes
spangles on leaves of Quercus. Ollerton
— tricolor, Htg. ( = Spathegaster tricolor) (sexual
form). Forms rounded hairy galls on Quercus
leaves. Clifton; Ruddington ; Balloon Houses,
Wollaton
— laeviusculis, Schenck (agamic form). Pro-
duces splangles on leaves of Quercus. Oiler-
ton
— albipes, Schenck ( = Spathegaster albipes) (sexual
form). Gives rise to small galls on edges of
leaves of Quercus
— numismatis, Oliv. (agamic form). Forms
silky ' button galls ' on leaves of Quercus. Oiler-
ton
— vesicatrix, Schlecht. ( = Spathegaster vesicatrix)
(sexual form). The galls are small blister-like
swellings on leaves of Quercus. Nottingham
Forest
— aprilinus, Gir. Galls on Quercus. Sherwood
Forest
CHALCIDIDAE
A very large group of small Hymenoptera, often brilliantly coloured, and of parasitic habits.
The larvae of many species inhabit galls, and feed on the larvae of the gall-makers or inquilines ;
others live in the nests of bees, whose grubs they devour ; others attack the caterpillars or pupae of
Lepidoptera, and some destroy aphides. Very few species have been obtained in Nottinghamshire,
and these were bred by Mr. G. B. Rothera from galls of various Cynipidae, etc. They are the
following : —
Tetrastichus diaphantus Walk, j In oafc_ ^
Entedon sosarmus, Walk. (Biorhiza ^rminSalis)
Olmx gallarum, Linn. ) ^
Eulophus westwoodii, Steph. In galls of Nematus
gallicola
Pteromalus fuscopalpus, Forst. In rose bedeguar gall
— tibialis, West. In oak currant gall (Spathegaster
baccarum)
Mesopolobus fasciiventris, West. In galls of Trigonaspis
megaptera and Neuroterus fumipennis
Eupelmus urozonus, Dalm. In oak-apple galls
Megastigmus dorsalis, Fab. ) In oak-apple and marble
— stigmatizans, Fab. J (Cynips kollari) galls
Syntomaspis sapphyrina, Boh. In oak-apple galls
Torymus abbreviatus, Boh. In the galls of Cecidomyia
rosae on rose leaves
— abdominalis, Boh. In oak-apples
hairy galls of Neuroterus fumipennis on oak
leaves and in the ' oak currant galls' (Neuroterus
lenticularis)
Torymus bedeguaris, Linn. In rose bedeguar galls
(Rhodites rosae)
- hibernans, Mayr f In oak-apples
- nigricornis, Boh. In oak-apple (B. terminalis)
and marble (Cynips kollari) galls
— tipularium, Zett. In galls of Nematus gallicola on
willow leaves
— viridis, F5rst. In the pea-like galls of Rhodites
eglanteriae on rose leaves
Eurytoma aethiops, Boh. In galls of Rhodites
eglanteriae and R. nervosus
- curta, Walk. In galls of Rhodites eglanteriae
— rosae, Nees. In bedeguar galls (Rhodites rosae)
- rufipes, Walk. In galls of Rhodites eglanteriae
and R. rosae
— auratus, Fourcr. In oak-apples ; also in the rounded
The Proctotrypid, Perisemus fulvicornis, Curt., was also bred from oak-apple galls by Mr. Rothera
ICHNEUMONIDAE
Ichneumon-flies 1
The Ichneumon-flies constitute an exceedingly large family of parasitic insects, most of them
living in the larval stage inside the bodies of lepidopterous caterpillars. In common with the next
family they are therefore of considerable economic importance, keeping in check the destroying hosts
of vegetable-feeding caterpillars which might otherwise eat up the produce of our gardens and fields.
The long, straight, many-jointed antennae, the position of the stalked abdomen which arises from
the lower part of the hind end of the alitrunk or ' thorax,' and of the middle and hind legs which
are inserted close together, are distinguishing features of the insects of this family. The wings also
have a characteristic and somewhat complex network of veins. The female possesses an ovipositor
which in some species is several times as long as the body, as, e.g. in species of Rhyssa and Thalessa
1 The arrangement and nomenclature adopted here are those of Dalla Torre's Catahgus Hymenopterorum.
87
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
which are parasitic on the wood-boring grubs of Sirex. The small somewhat ant-like Ichneumons
belonging to the genus Pezomachus are peculiar in being destitute of wings.
Very little work has been done among the Ichneumons in Nottinghamshire, as will appear
from the meagre list below. Acknowledgements are due to Mr. Claude Morley for much kindly
and valuable assistance in naming these, but many more still await identification.
Orthopelma luteolator (Grav.) Tasch. Nottingham
district, bred from galls of Rhodites rosae and
R. eglanteriae (G. B. Rothera)
Banchus falcatorius, Fabr. Aldercar Wood, Newstead
(Carr)
Exetastes cinctipes (Retz.) Thorns. Worksop district
(Miss Alderson and J. T. Houghton) ; S.
Leverton and Sutton, near Retford (Thornley) ;
Nottingham (Carr)
— guttatorius, Grav. Nether Langtoith (Carr)
— illusor, Grav. Worksop (J. T. Houghton)
Parabates virgatus (Fourc.) Thorns. (Paniscus vir-
gatus, Grav.). Retford district (Thornley) ;
Worksop (Houghton)
Paniscus cephalotes, Holmgr. S. Leverton, a male bred
from larva of Cerura vinula (Thornley)
— fuscicornis Holmgr. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
- testaceus, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Worksop
(Houghton) ; Retford, bred from Cerura
vinula (S. Pegler)
Spudastica kriechbaumeri (Bridgm.) D. T. (Lim-
neria, Bridgm). Worksop (Miss Alderson)
Campoplex pugillator (Linn.) Grav. Worksop (Miss
Alderson)
Blaptocampus perspicuus (Wesm.) Thorns. (Anoma-
lon perspicuum, Wesm.) Retford district
(Thornley)
Anomalon fibulator, Grav. Workscp and Edwinstowe
(Miss Alderson)
- flavifrons (Grav.) D. T. (A. cerinops, Grav.) (?)
Nottingham (Carr)
Allocamptus undulatus (Grav.) Brauns. (Ophion
undulatus, Grav.). Worksop (Houghton)
Ophion luteus (Linn.) Fabr. Worktop (Miss Aider-
son) ; S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Wellow (Rev.
W. Becher)
— obscurus, Fabr. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Notting-
ham (Carr). A very common species in the
autumn
Homotropus lateralis (Grav.) D. T. S. Leverton
(Thornley)
— pictus (Grav.) D. T. Nottingham (Carr).
— tarsatorius (Panz.) D. T. (Bassus exsultans,
Grav.). Worksop (Miss Alderson) ; S. Leverton
(Thornley)
Promethes pulchellus (Holmgr.) Thorns. Worksop
(Miss Alderson)
Bassus areolatus, Holmgr. Tresuiell Wood (Thorn-
ley)
— deplanatus, Grav. Bagthorpe, Nottingham (Carr)
— graculus, Grav. Worksop (Houghton)
- laetatorius (Fabr.) Panz. Nottingham (Carr)
— nemoralis, Holmgr. Nottingham (Carr)
Tryphon rutilator (Linn.) Grav. Thorney (Carr.)
Polytrera virgultorum (Grav.) Holmgr. Edwinstowe
(Miss Alderson)
Diaborus lituratorius (Linn.) Thorns. S. Leverton
(Thornley)
Alexeter testaceus (Fabr.) Thorns. S. Leverton
(Thornley)
Hadrodactylus fugax (Grav.) Thorns. Worksop (Miss
Alderson)
88
Mesoleptus cingulatus, Grav. Worktop (Miss Aider-
son)
Catoglyptus fortipes (Grav.) Holmgr. Treswell Wood
(Thornley)
Spanotecnus filicornis (Grav.) Thorns. Worksop
(Miss Alderson)
Sterotrichus pilicornis (Grav.) Schmkn. S. Leverton
(Thornley)
Glypta flavolineata, Grav. Treswell (Thornley)
— mensurator (Fabr.) Grav. Treswell Wood
(Thornley)
Pimpla examinator (Fabr.) Grav. Treswell Wood
(Thornley)
— instigator (Fabr.) Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Nottingham ; Hucknall Torkard ; Arnold, etc.
(Carr)
— maculator (Fabr.) Grav. (P. scanica, Grav.).
Worksop (Houghton)
— pomorum, Rate. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— rufata (Gmel.) Grav. (incl. P. flavonotata,
Holmgr.). Bunny, J bred from pupa of Thecla
w-album (' rufata ') (Carr). Treswell Wood, $
(' flavonotata ') (Carr)
- turionellae (Linn.) Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Kirkby-in-Ashfield (Carr.)
Dyspetes praerogator (Linn.) Thorns. Treswell Wood
(Thornley)
Rhyssa persuasoria (Linn.) Grav. Worksop (Miss
Alderson) ; Longford Moor (Carr)
Meniscus impressor (Grav.) Tasch. Clumber (Miss
Alderson)
— murinus (Grav.) SchiOdte. N. and S. Leverton,
and Treswell Wood (Thornley)
Lissonota bellator, Grav. Treswell Wood (Thornley) ;
Nottingham (Carr)
— cylindrator (Fabr.) Grav. Bulwett forest (Carr)
— sulphurifera, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Hybophanes scabriculus (Grav.) Schmkn. Worksop
(Houghton) ; also bred from Tortrix forsterana
by Miss Alderson
Collyria calcitrator (Grav.) Schiodte. S. Leverton
and TrestvellWood (Thornley) ; Widmerpool(Ci.rr)
Chaeretymma anatorium (Grav.) Schmkn. (Cryptus
anatorius, Grav.). Treswell Wood (Thornley)
Cryptus lugubris, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— minator, Grav. Clumber (Miss Alderson)
— tarsoleucus (Schrk.) Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Habrocryptus porrectorius (Fabr.) D. T. Treswell
Wood (Thornley)
Pezomachus melanocephalus (Schrk.) Kriechb. (Hemi-
machus fasciatus (Fab.) Marshall). Retford
district (Pegler)
Hemiteles areator (Panz.) Grav. Treswell Wood
(Thornley)
— bicolorinus, Grav. Worksop (Houghton)
— similis (Gmel.) Grav. 5. Leverton (Thornley)
Microcryptus abdominator (Grav.) Thorns. Clumber
(Miss Alderson)
Plectocryptus digitatus (Gmel.) Thorns. Southwell
(Carr)
Glyphicnemis vagabundus (Grav.) Ashm. S. Lever-
ton (Thornley) ; Hucknall Torkard, Thorney (Carr)
INSECTS
Phaeogenes stimulator (Grav.) Wesm. Retford, Ichneumon annulator, Fabr. (I. curvinervis, Holmgr.).
Treswell (Carr) S. Leverton (Thornley)
Mevesia argutus (Wesm.) Holmgr. Clumber (Miss — bilineatus, Gmel. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Alderson) — confusorius, Grav. Hucknall Torkard, Edtolnstowe
Herpestomus bruneicornis (Grav.) Wesm. Treswell (Carr)
Wood (Thornley) — deliratorius, Linn. (I. multiannulatus, Grav.).
Alomyia debellator (Fabr.) Panz. Worksop (Miss Treswell Wood (Thornley)
Alderson) ; S. Leverton and Tresviell Wood — extensorius, Linn. (I. luctatorius, Linn.). S.
(Thornley) Leverton and Treswell Wood (Thornley) ;
Eurylabus dirus, Wesm. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Wigsley, Bulwell Forest (Carr)
Treswell (Carr) — fabricator, Fabr. S. Leverton and Treswell Wood
Probolus alticola (Grav.) Wesm. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Southwell, Strelley (Carr)
(Thornley) — fuscipes, Gmel. Langford Moor, bred from larva
Epiopelmus leucostigmus (Grav.) Wesm. Treswell of Acronycta leporina (Carr)
Wood (Thornley) — gracilentus, Wesm. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
Amblyteles armatorius (Forst.) Holmgr. Worksop — lanius, Grav. Strelley (Carr)
(Miss Alderson and J. T. Houghton) ; S. — latrator, Fabr. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Leverton and Treswell Wood (Thornley) — lineator, Fab. Clumber (Miss Alderson)
— negatorius (Fabr.) Wesm. S. Leverton (Carr) — nigritarius, Grav. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
— occisor (Fabr.) Wesm. Arnold (Carr) — ochropis, Gmel. Worksop (Houghton)
— palliatorius (Grav.) Wesm. S. Leverton (Thorn- — sarcitorius, Linn. (I. vaginatorius, Linn.) Retford
ley) ; Nottingham, Retford, Creswell Crags (Carr) (Pegler) ; S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Widmerfool
Var. erythropygus (Grav.) Berth. Arnold (Carr)
(Carr) — terminatorius, Grav. Retford (S. Pegler) ; S.
— septemguttatus (Grav.) Thorns. S. Leverton Leverton (Thornley) ; Winkburn (Carr)
(Thornley) ; Treswell (Carr) — trilineatus, Gmel. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Ichneumon anator, Fab. Worksop (Miss Alderson) Hucknall Torkard (Carr)
BRACONIDAE
The Braconidae form another very extensive family of parasitic Hymenoptera. They are
closely allied to the Ichneumonidae both in structure and habits, the larvae inhabiting the bodies of
larvae or pupae of other insects, especially butterflies and moths.
Scarcely anything is known of these insects in Nottinghamshire. Several species of Bracon
have been identified, including B. caudatus, Ratz., bred by Mr. G. B. Rothera from oak-apple galls.
Apanteles glomeratus is as abundant here as elsewhere, and may be bred in hundreds from the larvae
of the cabbage white butterflies. A year or two ago, wishing to obtain some pupae of Pieris brassicae
for experimental purposes, I procured three dozen of the larvae, from which I only succeeded in
rearing two pupae ; all the rest yielded an abundance of the tiny yellow cocoons of the Apanteles !
Macrocentrus col/arts, M. marginator and other species have been bred from Tortrix larvae, and
Microdus tumidulus from the larva of Catoptria bypericana at Worksop by Miss Alderson, who has
also taken Meteorus ictericus at Worksop. Chaenon circulator and Zele testaceator have occurred at
Treswell Wood and other places, and a large number of unknown Braconids in the writer's and
the Rev. A. Thornley's collections still await identification.
TUBULIFERA OR CHRYSIDIDAE
Ruby-Wasps
The members of this comparatively small family are distinguished by the gorgeous coloration of
their exceedingly hard, coarsely-sculptured integument, the prevailing hues being brilliant metallic
green, blue, - and crimson. In spite of their rather small size they are therefore conspicuous
objects as they fly rapidly about in the hot sunshine. The eggs are laid in the nests of bees and
wasps and the resulting larvae feed on the bee- or wasp-grubs, and in some cases also on the food
stored up in the nest for the sustenance of its rightful occupants. Of the twenty-one British species
the following eight have so far been detected in the county by the Rev. A. Thornley and myself : —
Ellampus auratus, Linn. S. Leverton; Treswell Wood Chrysis ignita, Linn. Widely distributed and common.
Hedychridium minutum, Lep. Langford Moor, New- At Bagthorpe, 'Nottingham, it occurs about the
ark burrows of Colletes daviesana, and at Treswell
Chrysis neglecta, Shuck. Treswell, about the burrows Wood it accompanies C. viridula about the nests
of Odynerus spinipes of Odynerus spinipes. The Rev. A. Thornley
— pustulosa, Ab. S. Leverton captured some very large females at Elksley on
— cyanea, Linn. Thorney; Budby 1 6 July, 1900, which appeared to be parasitic
— viridula, Linn. ( = bidentata, Linn.). Treswell and on Odynerus antilope, and suggests that this
Treswell Wood ; in some numbers about the may possibly account for their large size
burrows of Odynerus spinipes — ruddii, Shuck. S. Leverton
I 89 12
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
ACULEATA
The principal feature which separates the Aculeata from other Hymenoptera is the modifica-
tion of the ovipositor into a retractile sting which is entirely hidden within the abdomen when
withdrawn. The larvae are soft legless grubs, either living under the protection of the adult insects
or in cells constructed by them. The series comprises four divisions, viz., Heterogyna (ants),
Fossores (solitary or digging wasps), Diploptera (wasps), and Anthophila (bees).
The ants are characterized by the presence of one or two small nodular swellings between the
' thorax ' and the ' abdomen ' in the place of the simple petiole or stalk of other Petiolata. They
live in extensive communities consisting of males, females, and workers or imperfectly developed
females. The males and females are winged, but the workers — which are by far the most
numerous — are wingless. After pairing, the males die and the females cast their wings and devote
themselves to egg-laying. The eggs and the helpless maggots hatched from them are tended by the
workers, which feed the larvae and also the fertile females. The nests are made by the workers,
and are irregular chambers connected by numerous galleries constructed underground, beneath stones,
in rotten wood, etc. Formica rufa, occurring commonly in fir-woods, builds large mounds of twigs
and pine-needles, often two feet high and a yard in diameter. The Heterogyna are not very well
represented in Nottinghamshire, only five native and two introduced species being recorded. The
Isopod Crustacean or Woodlouse, Platyarthrus hoffmannseggii, is common in many places in the nests
of certain species.1
Among the fossorial Hymenoptera each species consists of male and female only ; they are
neither social nor gregarious, and are of carnivorous habits. The females construct nests by burrowing
in sandy ground or in wood or plant-stems ; in these burrows they lay up a store of food for the
use of their offspring, consisting of spiders, aphides, larvae of Lepidoptera, Diptera, beetles, other
Hymenoptera, etc. ; these are usually not killed, but paralysed by being stung. So far, about
forty-five species have been collected in the county.
The Diploptera or true wasps may be distinguished from the other groups by the anterior wings
being longitudinally folded when at rest. Some species are solitary, consisting only of males and
females, and build earthen nests which they provision with caterpillars. The species of Odynerus
make their nests in holes in walls or woodwork, in plant-stems, or in burrows in the ground.
O. spinipes burrows in clay banks and builds a beautiful projecting trumpet-shaped approach to its
nest. The Vespidae or social wasps live in communities consisting of males, females and workers.
The nest is fashioned of paper manufactured by the wasps from the woody tissue of plants, and the
'comb ' or mass of cells in which the larvae are reared is usually in several distinct layers or plates
situated one above the other. The grubs are fed on insects or fruit, or both. In the autumn the
males and workers die off, but the young fertile females hibernate, and each founds a new nest in
the following spring, lays eggs, and rears a brood of workers which add largely to the size of the
nest and tend the succeeding broods of larvae. For long only workers are produced, but late in the
summer males and perfect females are developed. We possess five of the eight British species of
Vespa in Nottinghamshire. Of these V. crabro, the formidable hornet, is by far the rarest ; indeed
the only local specimen I have seen is one captured on the river bank at Ollerton by a man who
was cutting the water weeds ; it was taken by him to the Rev. W. Becher, who kindly presented
it to the Nottingham Museum. Fespa sylvestris, which suspends its nest from the branches of trees
and bushes, is very common with us, and may often be seen in numbers at the flowers of the
Water Betony (Scrophularia aquatica). Fespa vu/garis, V. germanica and V. rufa, which construct
their nests underground, are all common.
The Anthophila or bees may in general be known from the other Aculeate Hymenoptera by
the plumose or feathery hairs with which they are more or less clothed, by the flat and broad basal
segment of the hind foot, and by the long ' tongue ' adapted for sucking nectar from flowers ;
moreover the abdomen is never narrowed at the base to form an elongated stalk as it so often is in
the other groups. The majority of the Anthophila are solitary, but innumerable nests are frequently
constructed in close proximity. A soft sandstone road-cutting at Bagthorpe, Nottingham, exhibits
over a considerable area many hundreds of the burrows of Colletes davlesana to the square yard of
surface. Some burrow in wood or excavate bramble stems, others construct nests of clay in
cavities of walls or posts, or even utilize empty snail shells for the purpose. The writer has bred
nearly fifty specimens of Osmia rufa from a door lock which was completely filled with the clay
cells of this species. Some species live parasitically in the nests of other bees; thus Epeolus productus
occurs in abundance with the Colleta davlesana mentioned above, and the species of Nomada live at
the expense of species of Andrena. Anthophora acts as host to the parasitic Melecta, and Coelioxys is
1 It occurs most frequently in company with Laslus niger, less often it is associated with Lasiusflavus and
Myrmita rubra.
90
INSECTS
parasitic upon Megachile chiefly. The humble bees (Bombus) and the honey bee (Apis mellifica) are
social, living in societies consisting of males, females and workers. Pslthyrus is an ' unbidden guest '
in the nests of Bombus.
In the following list, unless otherwise stated, the species have all been seen by the writer in the
localities given.
HETEROGYNA (Ants)
FoRMICIDAB
Formica rufa, Linn. The large dome-shaped nests of
this species are common in fir-woods about
Thorney and Wigsley
— fusca, Latr. Quarry at Cresioell Crags; Oxton
Bogs
Lasius flavus, De Geer. Common
— niger, Linn. Common
[Plagiolepis flavidula, Reg. In greenhouse at Bram-
cote, introduced]
MYRMICIDAE
[Tetramorium guineense, Fab. Retford, introduced,
S. Pegler]
Myrmica rubra, Linn., race laevinodis. Common
,, „ „ ruginodis. Common
FOSSORES (Sand-wasps)
SAPYGIDAE
Sapyga quinquepunctata, Fab. S. Leverton, common
on walls, June, 1902 (Thornley)
— clavicornis, Linn. Nottingham (R. Bakewell), not
seen in recent years
POMPILIDAE
Pompilus plumbeus, Fabr. Nottingham ; Worksop ;
Everton ; Treswell
— gibbus, Fab. Bagthorpe and Bulwell Forest ; Lang-
ford Moor ; Worksop ; Everton
Salius fuscus, Linn. Treswell (Thornley) ; Bulwell ;
Thorney
— exaltatus, Fab. Longford Moor
— pusillus, Schiodte. Bulwell forest ; Thorney ;
Widmerpool, etc.
— parvulus, Dahl. Bulwell Forest, common
SPHECIDAE
Trypoxylon figulus, Linn. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Treswell; Budby
— attenuatum, Sm. Trestvell Wood (Thornley)
Ammophila sabulosa, Linn. Longford Moor
Spilomena troglodytes, V. d. Lind. S. Leverton
(Thornley)
Stigmus solskyi, Moraw. Bagthorpe, Nottingham
Pemphredon lugubris, Latr. S. Leverton, common
(Thornley) ; Wigsley ; Lowdham
— shuckardi, Moraw. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Hucknall Torkard ; Thorney
— lethifer, Shuck. Nottingham ; Hucknall Torkard ;
Bramcote ; Thorney
[Diodontus minutus, Fab. Newark (?) (Hadfield)]
— luperus, Shuck. Bagthorpe, Nottingham
— tristis, V. d. Lind. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Passaloecus corniger, Shuck. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— gracilis, Curt. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Thorney
Mimesa equestris, Fab. Thorney
— bicolor, Fab. Bulwell Forest, very common ;
Hollinwell
FOSSORES (Sand-wasps) (continued)
SPHECIDAE (continued)
Psen pallipes, Panz. S. Leverton, common (Thornley) ;
Styrrup
Gorytes mystaceus, Linn. Southwell
— quadrifasciatus, Fab. Thorney
Nysson dimidiatus, Jur. Barrow Hills, Everton,
26 Aug. 1 904 (Thornley)
Mellinus arvensis, Linn. Rare in Nottinghamshire ;
Barrow Hills, Everton, 4 September, 1903
— sabulosus, Fab. Rampton ; Thorney ; on Umbelli-
ferous flowers
Oxybelus uniglumis, Linn. Widely distributed and
common
Crabro clavipes, Linn. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— leucostomus, Linn. S. Leverton (Thornley);
Treswell ; Edwin statue
— podagricus, V. d. Lind. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— palmipes, Linn. Bagthorpe and Bulwell Forest,
Nottingham
— - varius, Lep. Widely distributed
— wesmaeli, V. d. Lind. Nottingham
— elongatulus, V. d. Lind. Widely distributed
— quadrimaculatus, Dahl. Langford Moor ; Work-
sop ; Sutton, nr. Retford
[ — signatus, Panz. Newark (?) (Hadfield)]
- dimidiatus, Fab. Common
- cephalotes, Panz. S. Leverton (Thornley)
- chrysostomus, Lep. Widely distributed and not
uncommon
- cribrarius, Linn. Very common in the sandy
district to the north of Nottingham, as at Bag-
thorpe, Basford, Bulwell Forest, etc. ; also about
Harby, Thorney and Wigsley. Six females
captured on Bulwell Forest as they were entering
their burrows were taking home the following
species of Diptera with which to provision
their nests : — Calliphora erythrocephala, Hyle-
myia strigosa, Pollenia rudis (two), and Thereva
nobilitata (two)
— peltarius, Schreb. Bulwell Forest; Langford
Moor
— interruptus, De Geer. Treswell Wood (E. Shaw);
Nottingham
— albilabris, Fab. Widely distributed, but not
common
Entomognathus brevis, V. d. Lind. Worksop
DIPLOPTERA (Wasps)
VESPIDAE
Vespa crabro, Linn. Ollerton (Rev. W. Becher)
— vulgaris, Linn. This and the two following
species are all of common occurrence throughout
the county.
— germanica, Fab.
— rufa, Linn.
— sylvestris, Scop. Common on flowers of Scrophu-
laria aquatica in many places throughout the
county
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
DIPLOPTERA (Wasps) (continued)
EUMENIDAK
Odynerus spinipes, Linn. Treswell Wood, abundant,
July, 1899, burrowing into the soil among the
branches of old upturned tree-roots. The
beautiful external tubular structures forming the
entrances to the burrows were very numerous.
The parasites Chrysis ignita and C. viridula
(bidentata) were rather common about the
burrows. Numerous nests were also found in
the clay banb of the Lea Beck in Trcstoell vil-
lage ; in and about these several Chrysis viridula
and C. neglecta were captured. O. spinipes
has also been taken, although less commonly, in
several other localities.
— callosus, Thorns. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— parietum, Linn. Widely distributed and common
— pictus, Curt. S. Leverton and Trestvell Wood
(Thornley)
— trifasciatus, Oliv. Occurs in many places, but not
commonly
— - parietinus, Linn. S. Leverton (Thornley) ,• Tres-
toell
— antilope, Panz. S. Leverton and Elksley (Thorn-
ley) ; Harby
- gracilis, Brulle. N. Wheatley and Treswell, on
flowers of Scrophularia aquatica, fairly common
- sinuatus, Fab. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Treswell
ANTHOPHILA (Bees)
OBTUSIL1NGUES
CoLLETIDAE
Colletes succincta, Linn. Bulwell Forest, flying over
Erica cinerea
— daviesana, Sm. Widely distributed. At Bag-
thorpe, Nottingham, it occurs in profusion, burrow-
ing in the sandstone rock at the sides of the road-
cutting near the prison. The parasites Epeolus
productus and Chrysis ignita infest the burrows
in considerable numbers; indeed, in 1900 the
Epeolus was almost as abundant as the Colletes,
which as a consequence has been less common
since
Prosopis communis, Nyl. Common
— hyalinata, Sm. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— pictipes, Nyl. Treswell Wood (Thornley) ; Hoi-
beck, near Welbeck
4CUTILINGUES
ANDRENIDAE
All widely distributed and
common
Sphecodes gibbus, Linn.
— subquadratus, Sm.
— pilifrons, Thorns.
— similis, Wesm. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— ferruginatus, Schenck. S. Leverton (Thornley)
• — variegatus, v. Hag. Blidworth
— dimidiatus, v. Hag. Langford Moor
— affinis, v. Hag. Bagthorpe ; Blidworth ; Thorney ;
Sutton, nr. Retford
Halictus rubicundus, Christ. Abundant everywhere
[ — leucozonius, Schrank. Newark (?) (Hadfield)]
— quadrinotatus, Kirb. Not uncommon in several
localities
— cylindricus, Fab. Of common and widespread
occurrence
— albipes, Kirb. Arnold ; Bulwell: Bunny
ANTHOPHILA (Bees} (continued)
4CUTILINGUES (continued)
ANDRENIDAE (continued)
Halictus villosulus, Kirb. Ckrborough (Thornley) ;
Cottam ; Treswell
— punctatissimus, Schenck. BRdworth
— nitidiusculus, Kirb. Widely distributed and
common
— minutus, Kirb. Bunny
— atricornis, Sm. Thorney ; Sherwood Forest, nr.
Edwinstotoe
— tumulorum, Linn. Common in various localities
— smeathmanellus, Kirb. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Wheatley (Rev. T. C. B. Chamberlin) ; Worksop
(Miss Alderson)
— morio, Fab. Blyth
— leucopus, Kirb. Not common, but widely dis-
tributed
Andrena albicans, Kirb. Very common everywhere
— rosae, Panz. var. trimmerana, Kirb. Very com-
mon
— nitida, Fourc. N. and S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Gedllng
— cineraria, Linn. Babworth (Pegler) ; common at
Langford Moor
— fulva, Schr. Universally distributed, and abund-
ant in some localities
— clarkella, Kirb. S. Leverton and Treswell Wood
(Thornley)
— nigroaenia, Kirb. Common
— gwynana, Kirb. Common
— varians, Rossi. Thorney ; Bilsthorpe
— fucata, Sm. Widely spread, but not common
— denticulata, Kirb. Edwinstotoe ; Wigsley ; Thor-
ney
— albicrus, Kirb. Common in a few localities, as
at Bulwell Forest
— chrysosceles, Kirb. Common
— analis, Panz. Langford Moor
— coitana, Kirb. Thorney
— humilis, Imhoff. Bulwell Forest, common
— labialis, Kirb. N. and S. Leverton and Trestoell
Wood, common (Thornley) ; Winkburn
— minutula, Kirb. Bagthorpe; Widmerpoot ; Lang-
ford Moor
— nana, Kirb. S. Leverton and Treswell (Thornley) ;
Burton Joyce ; Strelley ; Southwell
— wilkella, Kirb. Widely distributed, and common
in some localities
[ — tibialis, Kirb. ; A. bimaculata, Kirb. ; A.
thoracica, Fab. ; A. fulvicrus, Kirb. ; A.
similis, Sm. ; and A. afzeliana, Kirb., in the
late Mr. Hadfield's collection (now in the
possession of the Rev. A. Thornley), were all
probably collected in the Newark district]
Nomada solidaginis, Panz. Wigsley ; Thorney ; Lang-
ford Moor
— succincta, Panz. Fairly common throughout the
county
— alternata, Kirb. Widely distributed and not un-
common
— jacobaeae, Panz. Worksop
— lathburiana, Kirb. Langford Moor, common,
flying in company with Andrena cineraria
— ruficornis, Linn. Not rare
— bifida, Thorns. Treswell Wood; S. Leverton ;
Clarborough (Thornley)
INSECTS
ANTHOPHILA (Beet) (continued)
JCUTILINGUES (continued)
ANDRENIDAE (continued)
Nomada borealis, Zett. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
— ochrostoma, Kirb. Bukoell Forest; Lang ford
Moor
— fabriciana, Linn. C/arborough (Thornley); Strel-
ley ; Widmerpool ; Epper stone
— flavoguttata, Kirb. Treswell Wood (Thornley) ;
Strelley
API DAE
Epeolus productus, Thorns. Very common in certain
localities
— rufipes, Thorns. Bfidworth
Chelostoma florisomne, Linn. Not uncommon
Coelioxys rufescens, Lep. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— elongata, Lep. Bulwell Forest ; Lang ford Moor
Megachile willughbiella, Kirb. Newark (?) (Had-
field) ; 'Nottingham, 1905 (Thornley)
— circumcincta, Lep. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Button, nr. Retford
— centuncularis, Linn. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Nottingham
Osmia rufa, Linn. Nottingham, Worksop, and Retford
districts, common. In 1898 the writer bred
forty-eight specimens from a nest in the door-
lock of an outbuilding in Nottingham. Of this
number forty-three were males, and only five
females — a remarkable numerical discrepancy
in the sexes. The nest contained fifteen other
cocoons from which the bees failed to emerge,
and these on investigation were found to con-
ANTHOPHILA (Bees) (continued)
4CUTILINGUES (continued)
APIDAE (continued)
tain nine males, five females, and a larva — all
dead. The high mortality among the females
is noteworthy
Osmia caerulescens, Linn. S. Leverton and Treswell
Wood (Thornley)
[ — fulviventris, Panz., and O. aurulenta, Panz., are
both represented in the Hadfield collection,
and are probably from the Newark district]
Melecta armata, Panz. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
Anthophora retusa, Linn. Nottingham (Davis, in
Loudon's Mag. N. H., vol. v, 1832)
— pilipes, Fab. Rather common
Psithyrus rupestris, Fab. Retford (Pegler) ; Treswell
Wood (Thornley)
— vestalis, Fourc. Occurs throughout the county
— campestris, Panz. Retford (Pegler)
— quadricolor, Lep. S. Leverton and Grove (Thorn-
ley)
Bombus venustus, Sm. Moderately common
— agrorum, Fab. Common everywhere
— hortorum, Linn. Common. The var. harris-
ellus, Kirb., is not rare
— sylvarum, Linn. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Bunny;
Widmerpool
— lapidarius, Linn. Of common occurrence
— pratorum, Linn. Of common occurrence
- terrestris, Linn. Both the varieties, virginalis and
lucorum, are common
Apis mellifica, Linn. Abundant in a domesticated
state
COLEOPTERA
The Coleoptera or Beetles constitute a very large and distinct order of insects, easily dis-
tinguished by their firm integument, and especially by the hard and rigid character of the fore-
wings (elytra), which are not used for flight, but serve as protecting shields for the soft upper
surface of the abdomen and for the thin membranous posterior wings which are folded together
beneath the elytra and are alone concerned with flight.
The beetles of Nottinghamshire have been well worked out, thanks mainly to the exertions
of the Rev. Alfred Thornley, M.A., who has devoted many years to the investigation of the
Coleoptera of the county, and who has generously placed all his records at the writer's disposal.
The rich district of Sherwood Forest — perhaps one of the best collecting grounds in the country —
has been thoroughly investigated by the Rev. Canon Fowler, the Rev. A. Matthews, Mr. W. G.
Blatch, Mr. J. Kidson Taylor, Dr. G. W. Chaster, Mr. J. R. le B. Tomlin, and others, who
have discovered many rare species in this region, some of which have not occurred elsewhere in
the British Isles. The neighbourhood of Nottingham has been successfully worked by Mr. W. E.
Ryles and others, and Messrs. Stephen Pegler and J. T. Houghton have collected extensively in
the Retford and Worksop districts respectively. Many good species have also been discovered in
the extreme north of the county by the Rev. T. C. B. Chamberlin.
The following list comprises some 1,280 species out of an approximate total for Britain of
3,300 species. Localities are given for the rarer or more local species only. Where a locality is
given without an authority the species is to be regarded as of frequent occurrence in that locality,
or has been seen there by the writer. The arrangement and nomenclature followed are those of
Sharp and Fowler's Catalogue of British Coleoptera.
CICINDELIDAE
Cicindela campestris, L.
CARABIDAE
Cychrus rostratus, L. Aspley Woods, Nottingham
(Ryles)
Carabus catenulatus, Scop. Sherwood Forest (W. H.
Freestone) ; Worksop (J. T. Houghton)
CARABIDAE (continued)
Carabus nemoralis, Mull.
— violaceus, L.
— granulatus, L.
— monilis, Fab.
Notiophilus biguttatus, Fab.
— substriatus, Wat. ^Nottingham (Ryles) ; S. Lev-
— quadripunctatus, Dej.j erton (Thornley)
93
I
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
CARABIDAE (continued)
Nfotiophilus aquaticus, L. Not nearly so common in
Nottinghamshire as the next species
— palustris, Duft.
Leistus spinibarbis, Fab.
— fulvibarbis, Dej.
— ferrugineus, L.
— rufescens, Fab.
Nebria brevicollis, Fab.
— gyllenhali, Sch. Nottingham, 1898 (B. S. Dodd)
Blethisa multipunctata, L. S. Leverton (Pegler) ;
Nottingham and Bees ton (Ryles)
Elaphrus riparius, L.
— cupreus, Duft.
Loricera pilicornis, Fab.
Clivina fossor, L.
- collaris, Herbst. Nottingham (Ryles)
Broscus cephalotes, L. In Oct. 1895, Mr. Stephen
Pegler discovered a colony of this shore-loving
species in a sandy tract near Retford railway
station, in the parish of Ordsall
Badister unipustulatus, Bon. Newark (Fowler, Brit.
Cokop. i, 30)
- bipustulatus, Fab.
- sodalis, Duft. Aspley, Nottingham, 4 Oct. 1899
(Ryles)
Licinus depressus, Payk. Sherwood Forest (Ryles) ; an
interesting record, as this species is scarcely
known away from the chalk districts of the
south of England
Chlaenius nigricornis, Fab.
Acupalpus dorsalis, Fab. Stapleford Common, nr.
Newark (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. \, 38). This is
a somewhat doubtful Nottinghamshire record,
as a large part of the district thus designated
lies over the border in Lincolnshire
- exiguus, Dej., var. luridus, Dej. S. Leverton
- meridianus, L.
- consputus, Duft. Near Newark in plenty (J. F.
Dawson, Ent. Ann. 1856)
Bradycellus placidus, Gyll. Treiwell Wood (Thornley) ;
Grove (Pegler)
- cognatus, Gyll. TresweU Wood (Thornley) ; Ret-
ford (Pegler)
- distinctus, Dej.
- verbasci, Duft.
- harpalinus, Dej.
- similis, Dej.
Harpalus punctatulus, Duft. Newark (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. i. 45) ; Burton Joyce, several examples
(Ryles)
— azureus, Fab. Edtvalton and Burton Joyce (Ryles)
— rufibarbis, Fab.
- puncticollis, Payk.
- ruficornis, Fab.
- aeneus, Fab.
— rubripes, Duft. 'j
— discoideus, Fab. \Barrow Hills, Everton
- latus, L. J
- tardus, Panz.
Stomis pumicatus, Panz.
Platyderus ruficollis, Marsh. Nottingham, Lambley,
Clifton
Pterostichus cupreus, L.
— versicolor, Sturm. Much less common than the
last
- madidus, Fab.
— niger, Schall.
CARABIDAE (continued)
Pterostichus vulgaris, L.
— nigrita, Fab.
— minor, Gyll.
— strenuus, Panz.
— diligens, Sturm.
— picimanus, Duft. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Not-
tingham (Ryles)
— inaequalis, Marsh. Newark (Fowler, Brit. Coleop.
i, 67)
— vernalis, Gyll.
— striola, Fab.
Amara fulva, Dej. Nottingham district (Ryles)
— apricaria, Sturm.
— consularis, Duft. Nottingham (Ryles)
— aulica, Panz.
— bifrons, Gyll (=livida, Fab.)
— ovata, Fab.
— similata, Gyll.
— acuminata, Payk. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Not-
tingham
— tibialis, Payk.
— familiaris, Duft.
— trivialis, Gyll.
— communis, Panz.
— plebeia, Gyll.
Calathus cisteloides, Panz.
- fuscus, Fab. Babworth, 1897 (S. Pegler)
— flavipes, Fourc. Nottingham (Ryles)
— melanocephalus, L.
- micropterus, Duft. Barrow Hills, Everton, 8 Aug.,
1904 (Chamberlin)
— piceus, Marsh.
(S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Ret-
Taphria nivalis, Panz. < ford (Pegler) ; Sherwood
( Forest (Ryles)
Pristonychus terricola, Herbst.
Anchomenus angusticollis, Fab.
- dorsalis, Mull.
— albipes, Fab.
— oblongus, Sturm. Worksop (Ryles)
• — marginatus, L. Moor Green Reservoir, etc.
— sexpunctatus, L. Newark, Nottinghamshire (near
Stapleford Common, Fowler, Brit. Coleop. i, 90)
— parumpunctatus, Fabr.
— viduus, Panz., var. moestus, Duft.
— micans, Nic.
— fuliginosus, Panz.
- piceus, L.
- puellus, Dej. Not uncommon in early spring
by the Trent side, Nottingham (Ryles)
Olisthopus rotundatus, Payk.
Bembidium rufescens, Guir.
— quinquestriatum, Gyll. 5. Leverton (Thornley)
— obtusum, Sturm.
— guttula, Fab.
— mannerheimi, Sahl. Common in early spring in
flood refuse by the Trent, Nottingham (Ryles)
— biguttatum, Fab.
— riparium, Ol.
— aeneum, Germ.
— clarki, Daws. Moor Green Reservoir
— doris, Panz. ' Newark, in plenty ' (J. F. Dawson,
Ent. Ann. 1856); not seen since
— gilvipes, Sturm.
— lampros, Herbst.
— tibiale, Duft. Thurgarton (W. E. Ryles)
— decorum, Panz.
94
INSECTS
CARABIDAE (continued)
Bembidium nitidulum, Marsh. Moor Green Reser-
voir, etc.
— stomoides, Dej. Trent side at Cottam and Ramp-
ton, among the roots of Alopecurus genicu-
latus, close to the water's edge, July, 1899, and
subsequently, not uncommon (A. Thornley) ;
also at Littleborough and W. Burton (Pegler)
— quadriguttatum, Fab.
— quadrimaculatum, Gyll.
— lunatum, Duft. Not uncommon in the same
localities as B. stomoides, especially at Cottam
(Thornley)
— femoratum, Sturm.
— littorale, Ol.
— fluviatile, Dej. Banks of Trent near Newark
(Fowler, Brit. Coleop. \, 117); Nottingham,
Colwick, etc.
— punctulatum, Drap. Barton, Beeston, Colwick
(Ryles)
— flammulatum, Clairv. 'Nottingham, not uncommon
(Ryles) ; W. Burton (Pegler) ; Moor Green
Reservoir
Tachypus flavipes, L.
Trechus discus, Fab. Banks of Trent, Newark (Fowler,
Brit. Coleof. i, 126); banks of Trent, opposite
Gainsborough (Pegler) ; Nottingham (Pope)
— micros, Herbst. Retford and Cottam (Pegler)
— minutus, Fab.
„ var. obtusus, Er. Beeston (Ryles)
— secalis, Payk.
Patrobus excavatus, Payk.
Demetrias atricapillus, L.
Dromius linearis, Ol.
— agilis, Fab. Commoner in the Nottingham district
than the next species (Ryles)
— meridionalis, Dej.
— quadrimaculatus, L.
— quadrinotatus, Panz.
— melanocephalus, Dej.
Metabletus foveola, Gyll.
— truncatellus, L. Bramcote, nr. Nottingham, one
example (Ryles)
HALIPLIDAE
Brychius elevatus, Panz.
Haliplus flavicollis, Sturm.
— fulvus, Fab.
— ruficollis, De G.
— fluviatilis, Aub£. Littleborough (Thornley) ; Not-
tingham district (Ryles)
— lineatocollis, Marsh.
DYTISCIDAE
Noterus clavicornis, De G. Beeston (Ryles)
— sparsus, Marsh. Raddiffe-on-Trent (Ryles)
Laccophilus interruptus, Panz.) S.Leverton (Thornley);
— obscurus, Panz. J Nottingham (Ryles)
Hyphydrus ovatus, L.
Coelambus versicolor, Schall. Nottingham (W. H.
Freestone)
— inaequalis, Fab.
— confluens, Fab. N. Wheatley, 21 Sept. 1903
(Rev. T. C. B. Chamberlin)
Deronectes assimilis, Payk. Edwinstotve (Pegler)
— depressus, Fab.
— duodecimpustulatus, Fab.
DYTISCIDAE (continued)
Hydroporus pictus, Fab.
— granularis, L. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Cossall
— lepidus, Ol.
— rivalis, Gyll. Edwinstowe (Pegler)
— halensis, Fab. S. Leverton, a single example from
the Catchwater drain, Nov. 1895 (Thornley)
— dorsalis, Fab.
— lineatus, Fab.
— gyllenhali, Schiodte. 5. Leverton (Thornley)
— palustris, L.
— erythrocephalus, L.
— memnonius, Nic. Broadholme (Pegler)
— pubescens, Gyll.
— planus, Fab.
— lituratus, Fab.
Agabus guttatus, Payk.
— paludosus, Fab.
— didymus, Ol. Retford district, not uncommon
(Thornley)
— nebulosus, Forst.
— sturmii, Gyll.
— chalconotus, Panz.
— bipustulatus, Linn.
Platambus maculatus, L.
Ilybius fuliginosus, Fab.
— fenestratus, Fab. Wollaton (Ryles)
— ater, De G. Nottingham (Ryles) ; S. Leverton
(Thornley)
— obscurus, Marsh. Beeston (Ryles)
Colymbetes fuscus, L.
Dytiscus marginalis, L.
Acilius sulcatus, L.
GYRINIDAE
Gyrinus natator, Scop.
• — marinus, Gyll. Cossall, etc., not uncommon.
Orectochilus villosus, Mull. Nottingham, common in
the Trent in places (Ryles)
HYDROPHILIDAE
Hydrobius fuscipes, L.
Paracymus nigroaeneus, Sahl. Cottam
Anacaena globulus, Payk.
— limbata, Fab.
Cymbiodyta ovalis, Thorns. S. Leverton ; Cottam
Enochrus bicolor, Gyll. Newark (?) (Hadfield)
Chaetarthria seminulum, Herbst. S. Leverton
Laccobius sinuatus, Mots. Cinder-hill Brickyard near
Nottingham
— bipunctatus, Fab. Cossall
Helophorus rugosus, Ol. Newark (?) (Hadfield)
— nubilus, Fab.
— aquaticus, L.
— aeneipennis, Thorns.
— brevipalpis, Bedel
Hydrochus elongatus, Schall.
Octhebius rufimarginatus, Steph. Raddiffe-on-Trent
(Ryles)
Hydraena nigrita, Germ. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Cyclonotum orbiculare, Fab.
Sphaeridium scarabaeoides, Fab.
— bipustulatum, Fab.
„ var. marginatum, Fab. S. Leverton
(Thornley)
95
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
HYDROPHILIDAE (continued)
Cercyon haemorrhoidalis, Herbst.
- obsoletus, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
- flavipes, Fab.
— lateralis, Marsh.
-- melanocephalus, L.
— unipunctatus, L.
— quisquilius, L.
— nigriceps, Marsh. Nottingham (Ryles)
- analis, Payk.
— lugubris, Payk. Beeston, in flood refuse (Ryles)
Megasternum boletophagum, Marsh.
Cryptopleurum atomarium, Fab.
STAPHYLINIDAE
Aleochara fuscipes, Fab.
- lanuginosa, Grav.
- moesta, Grav.
- nitida, Grav.
— morion, Grav.
Microglossa suturalis, Sahl.
- pulla, Gyll. \SherwoodForest (Fowler,
Oxypoda spectabilis, Maerk. ) Brit. Cokop, ii, 24)
- lividipcnnis, Mann.
- opaca, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
- alternans, Grav.
- umbrata, Grav.
- haemorrhoa, Mann.
- annularis, Sahl. Sherwood Forest (Chaster)
Ischnoglossa corticina, lLr.\Shcrw>ood Forest (Fowler,
Ocyusa incrassata, Kr. J Brit. Coleop. ii, 40, 41)
- picina, Aub6. Clumber (Pegler)
Phloeopora reptans, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
- corticalis, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Chaster,
Tomlin)
Ocalea castanea, Er. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Homer)
Ilyobatcs nigricollis, Payk. Sherwood Forest (Chaster)
Chilopora longitarsis, Steph.
Myrmedonia limbata, Payk. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. ii, 56) ; S. Leverton (Thornley)
Astilbus canaliculatus, Fab.
Callicerus rigidicornis, Er. Sherwood Forest (Chaster)
Alianta incana, Er. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Homalota vicina, Steph.
— graminicola, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
— fungivora, Thorns. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Horner)
- nigella, Er. 5. Leverton (Thornley)
- picipes, Thorns. N
- aequata, Er. I Sherwood Forest (Blatch, Hor-
- linearis, Grav. ( ner, Fowler, and others)
- pilicornis, Thorns./
- circellaris, Grav.
- immersa, Er. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop.
»> 94)
- cuspidata, Er. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
- analis, Grav.
- depressa, Gyll. S. Leverton, on walls (Thornley)
— aeneicollis, Sharp. Sherwood Forest (Blatch,
Horner, etc.)
— xanthoptera, Steph.
- euryptera, Steph.
— trinotata, Kr.
— xanthopus, Thorns. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Horner)
— fungicola, Thorns.
STAPHYLINIDAE (continued)
Sherwood Forest (Blatch,
Horner, and others)
Homalota ignobilis, Sharp
— boletobia, Thorns.
— humeralis, Kr.
— gagatina, Baudi
— divisa, Maerk.
— nigricornis, Thorns.
— ravilla, Er.
— corvina, Thorns. t
— sericea, Muls.
— subtilis, Scriba. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— indubia, Sharp. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Horner)
— atricolor, Sharp. Abundant under elm bark in
Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— germana, Sharp
— celata, Er.
— canescens, Sharp
— cauta, Er.
• — setigera, Sharp
— macrocera, Thorns.,
— atramentaria, Gyll.
— cadaverina, Bris.
Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
others)
Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Sherwood Forest
— marcida, Er. j
— longicornis, Grav.
— sordida, Marsh.
— aterrima, Grav.
— muscorum, Bris. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Sherwood
Forest (Blatch)
— pilosiventris, Thorns. Sherwood Forest, under
bark (Blatch)
— fungi, Grav.
- cribrata, Kr. ? Sherwood Forest (Horner)
Falagria sulcata, Payk.
— obscura, Grav.
Autalia impressa, Ol.) p, , _ .„ .. .
- rivularis, Grav. ) Sbamatl Fmtt (Tomlln>
Encephalus complicans, Westw. S. Leverton (Thorn-
ley) ; Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. ii,
152)
Gyrophaena nana, Payk. Treswell Wood, common in
fungi (Thornley)
Agaricochara laevicollis, Kr.
Placusa pumilio, Grav.
— denticulata, Sharp
Epipeda plana, Gyll.
Leptusa fumida, Er. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
Sipalia ruficollis, Er. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Bolitochara lucida, Grav. Sherwood Forest (J. K.
Taylor, Blatch, etc.)
— • obliqua, Er. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
Hygronoma dimidiata, Grav. Clumber (Pegler)
Oligota inflata, Mann. Retftrd district and Sherwood
Forest
— pusillima, Grav. ) Sherwood Forest (Blatch, Horner,
— apicata, Er. } etc.)
Myllaena fowleri, Matth. Sherwood Forest, Rev. A.
Matthews (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. ii, 1 78)
Hypocyptus longicornis, Payk.
Conosoma littoreum, L.
— pubescens, Grav.
— immaculatum, Steph. Sherwood Forest (Chaster)
— lividum, Er.
Tachyporus obtusus, L.
„ var. nitidicollis, Steph. Sherwood
Forest, 1871 (J. R. Hardy)
— solutus, Er. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— chrysomelinus, L.
96
INSECTS
STAPHYLINIDAE (continued)
Tachyporus humerosus, Er.
— hypnorum, Fab.
— pusillus, Grav.
- brunneus, Fab.
Lamprinus saginatus, Grav. S. Leverton, a single
specimen in vicarage garden, 1895 (Thorn-
Ie7)
Cilea silphoides, L.
Tachinus humeralis, Grav.
- rufipes, L.
— subterraneus, L.
„ var. bicolor, Grav. Retford, with
type (Pegler)
— marginellns, Fab.
— collaris, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Notting-
ham (Ryles)
Megacronus cingulatus, Mann. Sherwood Forest
(Blatch, Homer, Fowler)
— analis, Fab.
Bolitobius lunulatus, L.
— trinotatus, Er.
— exoletus, Er. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
— pygmaeus, Fab.
Mycetoporus lucidus, Er. Sherwood Forest (Blatch
and Homer)
— punctus, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. ii, 215)
— lepidus, Grav. ) Sherwood Forest (Chaster
— longulus, Mann. J and Tomlin)
— splendidus, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Habrocerus capillaricornis, Grav. Colwick (Ryles)
Trichophya pilicornis, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Blatch
and Horner)
Heterothops dissimilis, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Quedius ventralis, Ar. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. ii, 231)
— lateralis, Grav. Sherwood Forest
— mesomelinus, Marsh.
— fulgidus, Fab. ) Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
• — • puncticollis, Thorns. J Brit. Coleop. ii, 233)
— cruentus, Ol. Retford (Pegler) ; Wheatley (H. B.
Chamberlin) ; Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Horner)
— xanthopus, Er. Sherwood Forest
— scitus, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and Horner) ;
Broadholme (Pegler)
— cinctus, Payk.
— fuliginosus, Grav.
— tristis, Grav.
— molochinus, Grav.
- nigriceps, Kr.
— maurorufus, Grav.
— rufipes, Grav.
— semiaeneus, Steph. Nottingham (Ryles)
— boops, Grav.
Creophilus maxillosus, L.
Leistotrophus nebulosus, Fab.
— murinus, L. Kingston-on-Soar (Thornley)
Staphylinus pubescens, De G.
— fulvipes, Scop. Sherwood Forest
— stercorarius, Ol. Kingston-on-Soar (Thornley)
Ocypus olens, Mull.
— cyaneus, Payk. Sherwood Forest (Rev. H.
Matthews) ; Newark, several specimens taken
by Mr. Hadfield (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. ii, 255)
— brunnipes, Fab.
— cupreus, Rossi
STAPHYLINIDAE (continued)
Ocypus ater, Grav. Retford (Pegler)
— morio, Grav.
— compressus, Marsh. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Nottingham (Ryles) ; Barrow Hills, Everton
Philonthus splendens, Fab.
— intermedius, Boisd. Retford (Pegler)
— laminatus, Creutz.
— aeneus, Rossi
( S. Leverton and Kingston-on-Soar
— proximus, Kr. j (Thornley) ; Sherwood Forest
( (Chaster and Tomlin)
— addendus, Sharp. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— decorus, Grav. Retford and Nottingham districts
— politus, Fab.
- varius, Gyll.
— marginatus, Fab.
- albipes, Fab. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— cephalotes, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Sher-
wood Forest (Blatch and Horner)
— fimetarius, Grav.
— sordidus, Grav.
— debilis, Grav.
- sanguinolentus, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Nottingham (Ryles)
- cruentatus, Gmel. Sherwood Forest
- varians, Payk.
- ventralis, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. ii, 274)
— discoideus, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley)
- splendidulus, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Chaster,
Tomlin); abundant under oak bark (Blatch)
— trossulus, Nord.
— puella, Nord. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. ii, 280) ; S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Retford (Pegler)
Actobius cinerascens, Grav. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Xantholinus glabratus, Grav.
- punctulatus, Payk.
- linearis, Ol.
Leptacinus parumpunctatus, Gyll. S. Leverton
(Thornley)
— linearis, Grav.
Baptolinus alternans, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
Othius fulvipennis, Fab.
- laeviusculus, Steph. Sherwood Forest (Fowler and
Tomlin)
— melanocephalus, Grav. Retford (Thornley and
Pegler) ; Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
— myrmecophilus, Kies.
Lathrobium elongatum, L.
— fulvipenne, Grav.
— brunnipes, Fab.
- longulum, Grav. Beeston (Ryles)
- quadratum, Payk. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Stilicus rufipes, Germ.
— orbiculatus, Er. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Horner) ; Retford (Pegler)
— affinis, Er.
Lithocharis ochracea, Grav.
Sunius angustatus, Payk.
Stenus biguttatus, L. Trent bank, Cottam and Llttlt-
borough ; Clumber (Pegler)
— guttula, Mull. Retford and Nottingham districts
— bimaculatus, Gyll.
- juno, Fab.
- speculator, Er.
- buphthalmus, Grav.
97
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
STAPHYLINIDAE (continued')
Stenus canaliculatus, Gyll. Trent bank, Beaton and
Radcltffe (Ryles)
— brunnipes, Steph.
— fuscicornis, Er. Gtwe (Pegler)
— impressus, Germ.
— flavipes, Steph.
— nitidiusculus, Steph.
— picipes, Steph.
- similis, Herbst.
— tarsalis, Ljungh
— paganus, Er.
Oxyporus rufus, L.
Platystethus arenarius, Fourc.
Oxytelus rugosus, Grav.
— sculptus, Grav.
— laqueatus, Marsh.
— sculpturatus, Grav.
— nitidulus, Grav.
- tetracarinatus, Block.
Haploderus coelatus, Grav. S. Leverton, on hawthorn
bloom (Thornley)
Trogophloeus bilineatus, Steph.
— corticinus, Grav. S. Leverton (Pegler)
Syntomium aeneum, Miill. Radcltffe - on - Trent
(Ryles)
Coprophilus striatulus, Fab.
Lesteva longelytrata, Goeze
Olophrum piceum, Gyll.
- fuscum, Grav. Clumber, three examples (Pegler)
Lathrimaeum atrocephalum, Gyll.
- unicolor, Steph.
Philorhinum sordidum, Steph. Sherwood Forest
(Fowler, Brit. Coleop. ii, 408)
Coryphium angusticolle, Steph. Sherwood Forest
(Blatch, Pegler, etc.)
Omalium rivulare, Payk.
- allardi, Fairm. Sherwood Forest (Chaster)
- exiguum, Gyll. ) Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
- oxyacanthae, Grav.j Coleop. ii, 414, 415)
- excavatum, Steph.
— caesura, Grav.
- pusillum, Grav.
- punctipenne, Thorns.
— rufipes, Fourc. S. Leverton, very common
(Thornley) ; Sherwood Forest
„ var. nigrum, Grav. Sherwood Forest
(Blatch and Horner)
— salicis, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— iopterum, Steph. 5. Leverton (Thornley) ; Retftrd
(Pegler) ; Sherwood Forest
— planum, Payk. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. ii, 421)
— concinnum, Marsh.
- deplanatum, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. ii, 422)
- striatum, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
Anthobium minutum, Fab. S. Leverton (Thorn-
ley)
— ophthalmicum, Payk.
— torquatum, Marsh
Proteinus ovalis, Steph.
— brachypterus, Fab.
Megarthrus denticollis, Beck. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. ii, 429)
— depressus, Lac.
— sinuatocollis, Lac.
Phloeocharis subtilissima, Mann. Sherwood Forest
STAPHYLINIDAE (continued)
Pseudopsis sulcata, Newm. S. Leverton, one example
in haystack refuse, 4 Oct. 1 899 (Thornley)
Prognatha quadricornis, Lac. j
I
abundant (Blatch)
PSELAPHIDAE
Pselaphus heisei, Herbst.
Tychus niger, Payk.
„ var. ibericus. Treswell (Thornley)
Bythinus curtisi, Denny. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Horner)
Batrisus venustus, Reich. Sherwood Forest, taken by
many collectors. ' In a nest of Formica fuliginosa
in an old tree' (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 93)
Bryaxis fossulata, Reich. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— haematica, Reich. Cottam (Pegler)
Bibloporus bicolor, Denny. Sherwood Forest (Blatch
and Horner)
Euplectus punctatus, Muls. '
— karsteni, Reich.
— signatus, Reich.
— nanus, Reich.
— sanguineus, Denny
- piceus, Mots.
— nubigena, Reitt.
Sherwood Forest (Blatch,
Horner, Fowler, and
others)
SCYDMAENIDAE
Neuraphes elongatulus, Mull. \ Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
— angulatus. Mull. / Brit.Coleop. iii, 74)
— planifrons, Blatch. Sherwood Forest, under bark of
birch stumps (Blatch)
Scydmaenus godarti, Latr. \ Sherwood Forest (Chaster,
- scutellaris, Mull. Tomlin, etc.), (also
— collaris, Mall. Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii,
— exilis, Er. ) 77-79)
Eumicrus tarsatus, Mull.
Eutheia clavata, Reitt. Sherwood Forest, under bark of
oak and birch logs, rare ; first taken by
Mr. Blatch in 1883, and subsequently by
Mr. Blatch, Mr. Horner, Canon Fowler, and
Dr. Chaster
98
SILPHIDAE
Calyptomerus dubius, Marsh. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Clumber (Pegler)
Agathidium nigripenne,Kug. (
— atrum, Payk.
— seminulum, L.
V, 15, 1 6)
— laevigatum, Er. Clumber (Pegler)
— varians, Beck. Newark (?) (Hadfield)
— rotundatum, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Chaster)
— nigrinum, Sturm. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 18—20)
Amphicyllis globus, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Chaster, Tomlin)
Liodes humeralis, Kug. Sherwood Forest; Treswell
Wood
— orbicularis, Herbst. Sherwood Forest
Anisotoma oblonga, Er. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iii, 27)
— dubia, Kug. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
INSECTS
SILPHIDAE (continued}
Anisotoma obesa, Schmidt. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iii, 29)
— calcarata, Er.
Colenis dentipes, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Necrophorus humator, Fab.
— mortuorum, Fab.
— vestigator, Heer. Newstead (Win. Allen) ; Clum-
ber (Pegler) ; Nottingham
— • ruspator, Er. Nottingham, Worksop, and Retford
districts
„ var. microcephalus, Thorns. Aspley Woods
(Ryles)
— interruptus, Steph. Near Nottingham, rare
(Dr. G. Howitt)
— vespillo, L.
Necrodes littoralis, L. In dead animals in the Vale of
Trent (Dr. G. Howitt) ; Kingston-on-Soar, in
dead squirrel, 1905 (Thornley)
Silpha tristis, 111. Nottinghamshire (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 48)
— nigrita, Creutz. Nottingham (Howitt, Ryles, Dodd,
etc.)
— obscura, L. 'Nottinghamshire (Fowler, Brit. Coleop.
iii, 49)
— quadripunctata, L. Sherwood Forest
— reticulata, Fab. " Nottinghamshire (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 50)
— opaca, L. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Nottingham
(Dr. G. Howitt)
— thoracica, L.
— rugosa, L.
— sinuata, Fab.
— strata, L.
„ var. brunnea, Herbst. Clifton Grove (Ryles)
Choleva angustata, Fab. Nottingham (Dr. Howitt)
— cisteloides, Frohl.
— intermedia, Kr. Nottingham (Ryles)
— spadicea, Sturm. Nottingham (T. Ludgrove ;
specimen named by Canon Fowler); Sherwood
Forest
— agilis, 111.
— velox, Spence
— anisotomoides, Spence. Treswell (Thornley) ;
Retford (Pegler)
— fusca, Panz.
— nigricans, Spence
— morio, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 62)
— grandicollis, Er.
— nigrita, Er.
— tristis, Panz.
— kirbyi, Spence
— chrysomeloides, Panz.
— fumata, Spence
— watsoni, Spence
Ptomaphagus sericeus, Fab.
— varicornis, Ros. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 66) ; Retford (Pegler)
HISTERIDAE
Hister unicolor, L. Nottingham and Retford districts
(Thornley and Ryles)
— merdarius, Hoff. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Sher-
wood Forest (Blatch)
— cadaverinus, Hoff. Nottingham, Worksop, and Ret-
ford districts
HISTERIDAE (continued)
— stercorarius, Hoff. Newark (?) (Hadfield coll.)
Hister succicola, Thorns. Sherwood Forest
— purpurascens, Herbst. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iii, 202) ; Fiskerton (Ryles) ; there
were numerous specimens in the late Mr. Had-
field's collection, presumably from the Newark
district
— marginatus, Er. Sherwood Forest (Chaster)
— neglectus, Germ. Nottingham Forest (Dr. Godfrey
Howitt) ; Newark district (?) (Hadfield coll.)
— carbonarius, 111.
— I2-striatus, Schr.
— bimaculatus, L.
Carcinops 1 4-striata, Steph. Sherwood Forest (Blatch) ;
Retford, in old corn-mill (Pegler)
Dendrophilus punctatus, Herbst. One specimen from
dead bird, Nottinghamshire, 1828 (Dr. Howitt) ;
Sherwood Forest (Tomlin and Chaster)
Gnathoncus punctulatus, Thorns. Retford, not un-
common in old corn-mill (Pegler) ; S. Leverton,
one example, 20 May, 1901 (Thornley)
Saprinus nitidulus, Payk.
— aeneus, Fab. Bulwell Forest, 3 June, 1899;
abundant in Nottinghamshire (Dr. Howitt); now
rare
— virescens, Payk. Once taken by Mr. Marlow at
Welbeck (Dr. Howitt); taken recently in the
Retford district by Rev. T. C. B. Chamberlin
— rugifrons, Payk. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 212)
Plegaderus dissectus, Er. Sherwood Forest, taken on
various occasions from 1870 on wards by several
collectors
Abraeus globosus, Hoff. Retford (Pegler) ; Sherwood
Forest (Blatch)
— granulum, Er. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Acritus minutus, Herbst.
Onthophilus sulcatus, Fab. Nr. Nottingham (A. H.
Davis, in Loudon's Mag. N. H., April, 1832) ;
Nottinghamshire, Stephens (Fowler, Brit. Coleop.
iii, 217)
— striatus, Fab.
SCAPHIDIIDAE
Scaphidium quadrimaculatum, Ol. Sherwood Forest ;
Langford Moor
Scaphisoma agaricinum, L. Retford (Pegler) ; Sher-
wood Forest (Blatch, Homer, etc.)
— boleti, Panz. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and Homer)
TRICHOPTERYGIDAE
Pteryx suturalis, Heer. Sherwood Forest
Ptinella testacea, Heer. ' Under bark of dead beech ;
taken in great abundance by Rev. A. Matthews
in Sherwood Forest, and also by Mr. Blatch '
(Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 1 1 1)
— denticollis, Fa>
-aptera,Guer
— angustula, Gill.
— tenella, Er. A single example under bark of dead
oak in Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii,
113)
Trichopteryx sarae, Matth. 'Two specimens were
taken in Nottinghamshire by the Rev. H. Mat-
thews in 1 86 1 ; the species has not been found
since that time ' (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 1 1 6)
and Fowler
99
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
TRICHOPTERYGIDAE
Trichopteryx anthracina, Matth. \ Sherwood Forest
— seminitens, Matth. (Fowler, Brit.
— attenuate, Gill. Coleop. iii, 1 1 8-
— picicornis, Mann. / I23)
- carbonaria, Matth. 'A single example was taken
in Aug., 1868, by the Rev. A. Matthews in
Thoresby Park, Nottinghamshire, by sweeping
under oaks' (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 123)
— obscaena, Woll. ' Has once been taken in faggots
by Mr. Matthews in Sherwood Forest ' (Fowler,
Brit. Coif of. iii, 124)
Ptilium marginatum, Aub£. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— halidayi, Matth. ' A single example was taken
by Mr. Matthews under bark of dead oak in
Sherwood Forest' (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 134)
Ptenidium nitidum, Heer
- evanescens, Marsh.
- turgidum, Thorns. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— gressneri, Er. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
CORYLOPHIDAE
Orthoperus brunnipes, Gyll. Sherwood Forest
- corticalis, Redt. Two specimens taken by the
Rev. A. Matthews in Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iii, 144)
- atomus, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Corylophus cassidioides, Marsh. Clumber (Pegler)
COCCINELLIDAE
Subcoccinella 24-punctata, L."\
Hippodamia variegata, Goeze >S. Leverton (Thornley)
Anisosticta ip-punctata, L. J
Adalia oblitcrata, L. Type common ; var. fenestrata,
Weise, taken in Sherwood Forest by Canon
Fowler
— bipunctata, L.
Anatis ocellata, L. Langford Moor, common on firs
(Thornley) ; Clumber (Pegler)
Coccinella lo-punctata, L.
— hieroglyphics, L.
— • I I-punctata, L.
— 7-punctata, L.
Halyzia 14-guttata, Poda
- 1 8-guttata, L.
• — conglobata, L.
- 22-punctata, L.
Scymnus nigrinus,
— capitatus, F.
— haemorrhoidalis, Herbst. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
— testaceus, Mots., var. scutellaris, Muls. Canal
bank, Retford (Pegler)
Platynaspis luteorubra, Goeze. Sherwood Forest (Fow-
ler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 175)
Chilocorus similis, Rossi. Treswell ; Grove
— bipustulatus, 111. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 176) ; Barrow Hills, Everton
(Thornley)
Exochomus quadripustulatus, L. Occurs throughout
the county
Rhizobius litura, Fab.
Coccidula rufa, Herbst. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Retford (Pegler)
ENDOMYCHIDAE
Mycetaea hirta, Marsh. 5. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Retford (Pegler)
has
EROTYLIDAE
Dacne rufifrons, Fab. Very widely distributed in
Nottinghamshire
Triplax russica, L. Sherwood Forest (Fowler) ; on ash
trees near Nottingham (Dr. G. Howitt)
— aenea, Schall. Littleborough (Thornley) ; Notting-
ham, in numbers in company with Tetratoma
fungorum (Ryles)
Cyrtotriplax bipustulata, Fab. Sherwood Forest (J. K.
Taylor, Chaster, and Tomlin)
PHALACRIDAE
Phalacrus caricis, Sturm. Retford district (Pegler)
Olibrus corticalis, Panz. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
— aeneus, Fab.
Eustilbus testaceus, Panz.
MICROPEPLIDAE
Micropeplus porcatus, Payk.
— staphylinoides, Marsh.
— margaritae, Duv.
- tesserula, Curt. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Blatch,
Tomlin, etc.) ; 36 specimens taken off an oak
stump, June, 1889 (Blatch)
NITIDULIDAE
Brachypterus pubescens, Er.
— urticae, Fab.
Cercus pedicularius, L. Retford district (Pegler)
— bipustulatus, Payk. Sherwood Forest, in Cossus
burrows (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 223)
Carpophilus hemipterus, L. Newark district (?) (Had-
fieldcoll.)
— mutilatus, Er. Sparingly in Cossus burrows in
Sherwood Forest; Mr. J. R. Hardy (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iii, 224)
Epuraea decemguttata, Fab. Sherwood Forest
— aestiva, L.
— melina, Er. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood (Thornley)
— longula, Er. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop.
iii, 229)
— deleta, Er.
— parvula, Sturm. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 231)
— obsoleta, Fab.
Omosiphora limbata, Fab. Retford district (Thornley
and Pegler)
Nitidula bipustulata, L.
— rufipes, L. Nottinghamshire, rare (Dr. Howitt)
Soronia grisea, L. Retford district (Thornley and
Pegler)
Omosita depressa, L. Retford (Pegler) ; Sherwood
Forest (Blatch)
— colon, L.
— discoidea, Fab.
Pocadius ferruginous, Fab. Sherwood Forest ; Treswell
Wood, etc.
Meligethes rufipes, Gyll.
— lumbaris, Sturm. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
— aeneus, Fab.
— viridescens, Fab.
— morosus, Er. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— picipes, Sturm.
— murinus, Er. Barrow Hills, Everton
100
INSECTS
NITIDULIDAE (continued)
Cychramus luteus, Fab.
— fungicola, Heer
Cryptarcha strigata, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
Ips quadriguttata, Fab. Sherwood Forest
Pityophagus ferrugineus, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Tom-
lin)
TROGOSITIDAE
Ncmosoma elongatum, L. Beeston, Mr. J. Sidebotham
(Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 268). One specimen
beaten from bramble at Cokuick, near Notting-
ham, 1828 (Dr. G. Howitt)
Tenebrioides mauritanicus, L.
Thymalus limbatus, Fab. Sherwood Forest
COLYDIIDAE
Teredus nitidus, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Tomlin)
Cerylon histeroides, Fab. Under bark of willows,
Nottinghamshire (Dr. G. Howitt) ; Sherwood Forest
(Tomlin)
— fagi, Bris. Wollaton ; Nottingham (Ryles)
— ferrugineum, Steph. Wollaton (Freestone) ; Ret-
ford (Pegler) ; Sherwood Forest
CUCUJIDAE
Rhizophagus cribratus, Gyll. '
— depressus, Fab.
Sherwood Forest (Blatch,
Homer, Fowler, and
others)
perforatus, Er.
- parallelocollis, Er.
— oblongocollis, Blatch
— ferrugineus, Payk.
— nitidulus, Fab.
— dispar, Gyll.
— bipustulatus, Fab.
— politus, Hellw. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and Gor-
ham)
Pediacus dermestoides, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Chaster, and Tomlin)
Laemophloeus ferrugineus, Steph. Grove (Pegler) ;
Worksop (Houghton)
Psammoechus bipunctatus, Fab. Clumber (Pegler)
Silvanus surinamensis, L. Retford district (Pegler)
MONOTOMIDAE
Monotoma picipes, Herbst. S. Leverton, in hot
frame (Thornley)
— longicollis, Gyll. S. Leverton, in hot frame
(Thornley) ; Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
LATHRIDIIDAE
Lathridius lardarius, De G.
— bergrothi, Reitt. On 13 November, 1900, 1 found
several examples of this beetle feeding on a dried
specimen of burdock in a parcel of British plants
which I was incorporating in the herbarium
at Nottingham University College, Accompany-
ing it were Cartodere filum and Corticaria
fulva, both in some numbers. All the species
were identified by Mr. G. C. Champion
Coninomus nodifer, Westw.
Enicmus minutus, L.
— transversus, Ol.
LATHRIDIIDAE (continued)
Enicmus rugosus, Herbst. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleof. iii, 284)
— testaceus, Steph. Sherwood Forest (J. K. Taylor
and W. G. Blatch) ; Tuxford (S. Pegler)
— ' consimilis, Mann.' (= brevicornis, Mann.). Sher-
wood Forest (see Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iii, 283)
Cartodere ruficollis, Marsh.
— elongata, Curt. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 286)
— filiformis, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
— filum, Aub6. Several specimens feeding on dried
burdock in University College, Nottingham (see
note under Lathridius bergrothi above)
Corticaria pubescens, Gyll.
— denticulata, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Fowler) ;
Tuxford, Ordsall, and Lound (Pegler)
— serrata, Payk. Clarborough (Thornley) ; Sherwood
Forest (Blatch)
— fulva, Com. Found in numbers feeding on dried
burdock, University College, Nottingham (see note
under Lathridius bergrothi above)
— elongata, Humm.
Melanophthalma gibbosa, Herbst.
— fuscula, Humm.
CRYPTOPHAGIDAE
Telmatophilus caricis, Ol.
Antherophagus nigricornis, Fab. Budby, Sherwood
Forest (J. Golding, etc.)
Cryptophagus lycoperdi, Herbst.
— setulosus, Sturm. Treswell (Thornley)
— pilosus, Gyll.
- ruficornis, Steph. Sherwood Forest (Chaster)
— saginatus, Sturm.
— scanicus, L.
— acutangulus, Gyll. Retford district (Pegler)
— cellaris, Scop.
- pubescens, Sturm. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iii, 325)
— bicolor, Sturm. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Micrambe vini, Panz.
Henoticus serratus, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (J. K.
Taylor and Blatch)
Paramecosoma melanocephalum, Herbst. Cottam
(Pegler)
Atomaria nigriventris, Steph.
— elongatula, Er. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— nigripennis, Payk.
— munda, Er. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— fuscata, SchSn.
- atra, Herbst. Radcliffe-on-Trent (Ryles)
- pusilla, Payk.
— atricapilla, Steph.
— basalis, Er. Clumber (Pegler)
— apicalis, Er.
— analis, Er.
- ruficornis, Marsh.
Ephistemus gyrinoides, Marsh.
MYCETOPHAGIDAE
Typhaea fumata, L.
Triphyllus suturalis, Fab. Newark (Ryles) ; Retford
district (Pegler) ; Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Horner)
— punctatus, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Horner)
101
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
MYCETOPHAGIDAE (continued)
Litargus bifasciatus, Fab. Clifton Grove, nr. Nottingham
(Ryles)
Mycetophagus quadripustulatus, L. Nottingham,
Worksop, and Retford districts
— piceus, Fab. Lound, near Ret/bra" (Pegler) ; Sher-
wood Forest
— atomarius, Fab. Clifton Grove (Ryles)
— qu.idrigutt.itus, Mull. Retford, in old corn mill
(Pegler)
— multipunctatus, Hellw. Littleborougb (Thornley)
BYTURIDAE
Byturus tomentosus, Fab.
DERMESTIDAE
Derrnestes vulpinus, Fab. Bone works at Nottingham
(Ryles) and Retford (Thornley and Pegler) ;
Worksop (Houghton)
— murinus, L. Has occurred throughout the county
in dead birds, etc.
— lardarius, L.
Attagenus pellio, L.
Megatoma undata, Er. Nr. Nottingham (Dr. Howitt) ;
Sherwood Forest (Fowler and Ryles) ; Retford
district (Pegler)
Tiresias serra, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Anthrenus musaeorum, L.
- claviger, Er. Nottingham, Worksop, and Retford
districts, common ; ' sometimes swarms at
parsley flowers at S. Leverton ' (Thornley)
BYRRHIDAE
Byrrhus pilula, L.
— fasciatus, Fab.
— murinus, Fab. Nottingham, once taken (Dr.
Howitt)
Cytilus varius, Fab.
Simploc.iria semistriata, Fab.
Aspidiphorus orbiculatus, Gyll. Sherwood Forest
PARNIDAE
Elmis aeneus, Mull.
— cupreus, Mall. Treswell (Thornley)
Parnus prolifericornis, Fab.
— auriculatus, Panz. Newark district (?) (Hadfield
coll.)
HETEROCERIDAE
Heterocerus marginatus, Fab. Barton-in-Fabis (Pope)
LUCANIDAE
Dorcus parallelopipedus, L. Nottingham district (Wol-
laton, Clifton Grove, etc.) ; Wheatley (Rev. T.
C. B. Chamberlin) ; Retford district (Pegler) ;
Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv, 6)
Sinodendron cylindricum, L.
SCARABAEIDAE
Onthophagus ovatus, L. Mansfield (Dr. G. Howitt)
— coenobita, Herbst. Rare near Nottingham (Dr.
Howitt)
— nuchicornis, L. Nottingham, abundant, 1830
(Dr. Howitt) ; Retford district (Pegler)
SCARABAEIDAE (continued)
Aphodius erraticus, L.
— subterraneus, L.
— fossor, L.
— haemorrhoidalis, L.
— foetens, Fab.
— fimetarius, L.
— scybalarius, Fab.
— ater, De G.
— constans, Duft. Coltvick, fairly common in early
spring (Ryles)
— granarius, L.
— rufescens, Fab. Nottingham and Retford districts
— porcus, Fab. Clumber (Pegler) ; not uncommon
near Nottingham (Dr. G. Howitt)
— pusillus, Herbst. Nottingham and Retford districts
— merdarius, Fab.
— inquinatus, Fab.
— sticticus, Panz. S. Leverton, common (Thornley)
— punctato-sulcatus, Sturm.
— prodromus, Brahm.
— contaminatus, Herbst. Nottingham and Retford
districts, often abundant.
— luridus, Fab. (The black var. also occurs)
— rufipes, L.
— depressus, Kug.
Geotrupes typhoeus, L. Common throughout the
Forest district of Nottinghamshire ; Dr. Howitt
(Stephens)
— spiniger, Marsh.
— stercorarius, L.
- — • sylvaticus, Panz.
— vernalis, L. Mansfield Forest (Dr. Howitt)
Trox scaber, L. Nottingham and Retford districts
Hoplia philanthus, Fuss. ' Nottinghamshire ' (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iv, 48)
Serica brunnea, L.
Rhizotrogus solstitialis, L. Nottingham, sometimes
common ; Worksop (Houghton)
Melolontha vulgaris, Fab.
Phyllopertha horticola, L.
Cetonia aurata, L. Mansfield (Dr. G. Howitt)
BUPRESTIDAE
Agrilus laticornis, 111. (?) Treswell Wood (Pegler)
— angustulus, 111. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
THROSCIDAE
Throscus dermestoides, L. Longford Moor, common
(Thornley) ; Nottingham (Ryles); Sherwood Forest,
common
EUCNEMIDAE
Melasis buprestoides, L. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
ELATERIDAE
Lacon murinus, L.
Cryptohypnus riparius, Fab.
— quadripustulatus, Fab. Nottingham district (Ryles)
Elater lythropterus, Germ. Sherwood Forest
— coccinatus, Rye. Sherwood Forest (Blatch; Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iv, 90)
— pomonae, Steph. Sherwood Forest (]. Ray Hardy)
[See Ent. Month. Mag. April, 1873, p. 268]
— pomorum, Herbst. Sherwood Forest; first taken
in 1836 by Dr. Howitt and T. Desvignes, and
from 1 886 to the present time by Fowler, Blatch,
Homer, and others
102
INSECTS
ELATERIDAE (continued)
Melanotus rufipes, Herbst.
„ var. castanipes, Payk. Sherwood
Forest (Trueman ; Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iv, 97)
Athous rhombeus, Ol. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— niger, L.
— longicollis, Ol.
— haemorrhoidalis, Fab.
— vittatus, Fab.
Limonius minutus, L.
Adrastus limbatus, Fab.
Agriotes sputator, L.
— obscurus, L.
— lineatus, L.
• — • sobrinus, Kies.
— pallidulus, 111.
Dolopius marginatus, L.
Corymbites pectinicornis, L. Worksop (Houghton) ;
Retford (Pegler) ; Grove (Rev. G. Shipton) ;
Wheatley (Rev. T. C. B. Chamberlin) ; Barton
(Ryles)
— cupreus, Fab. Nottingham, with var. aeruginosus,
Fab. (Ryles); Lowdham (C. E. Pearson)
- tessellatus, Fab. Southwell (Ryles)
— quercus, Gyll. Nottingham district, with var.
ochropterus, Steph. (Ryles) ; Worksop (Hough-
ton)
— holosericeus, Fab.
— aeneus, L. Nottingham (Ryles) ; Sherwood Forest
(Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv, 114); Bulwell Forest
— bipustulatus, L. Sherwood Forest (Turner ; Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iv, 115)
Campylus linearis, L. Aspley ; Nottingham ; Hazle-
Jbrd (Ryles) ; Treswell and Gringley Woods
(Thornley)
DASCILLIDAE
Dascillus cervinus, L. Clumber (Pegler) ; Wheatley
(Rev. T. C. B. Chamberlin) ; Nottingham (Ryles)
Helodes minuta, L.
Microcara livida, Fab.
Cyphon variabilis, Thunb.
Prionocyphon serricornis, Moll. Sherwood Forest
Scirtes hemisphaericus, L. Sutton, nr. Retford, abun-
dant among Equisetum (Thornley)
MALACODERMIDAE
Pyropterus affinis, Payk. Sherwood Forest, 1869 (J. R.
Hardy) ; also taken there in 1869 and 1870 by
J. Kidson Taylor, and subsequently by Rev. A.
Matthews and others (see Fowler, Brit. Coleop.
iv, 128)
Platycis minutus, Fab. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
Lampyris noctiluca, L. Retford district (Pegler) ;
Sherwood Forest ; Kingston-on-Soar
Podabrus alpinus, Payk. Aspley, Nottingham (Ryles) ;
Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv, 133)
Telephorus rusticus, Fall.
— lividus, L.
— pcllucidus, Fab.
— nigricans, Mtill., and var. discoideus, Steph.
— obscurus, L. Nottingham (Ryles) ; Retford dis-
trict (Pegler) ; Sherwood Forest (Turner and
Blatch ; Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv, 138)
- lituratus, Fab.
- bicolor, Fab.
MALACODERMIDAE (continued)
Telephorus haemorrhoidalis, Fab. Nottingham (Ryles) ;
Retford (Pegler) ; S. Leverton, common on
hawthorn flowers (Thornley)
— oralis, Germ. Nottingham (Ryles) ; S. Leverton
(Thornley)
— flavilabris, Fall.
— thoracicus, Ol. Nottingham (Pope)
Rhagonycha fuscicornis, Ol.
— fulva, Scop.
— testacea, L. Nottingham (Ryles) and Retford
(Thornley) districts
— limbata, Thorns.
— pallida, Fab.
Malthinus punctatus, Fourc.
— fasciatus, Ol. Langford Moor (Thornley) ; Sherwood
Forest
Malthodes marginatus, Latr.
— minimus, L.
— fibulatus, Kies. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iv, 152)
Malachius bipustulatus, L.
Dasytes flavipes, Fab. Nottingham district (Ryles) ;
S. Leverton (Thornley)
— oculatus, Kies. Sherwood Forest (E. C. Rye ; and
Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv, 161)
- aerosus, Kies.
Phloeophilus edwardsi, Steph. Sherwood Forest (Rev.
A. Matthews) (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv, 165)
CLERIDAE
Opilo mollis, L. Nottingham Park (Ryles)
Thanasimus formicarius, L. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
(Nottingham, in profusion in
bone mill (Ryles) .Retford
common in bone mill
(Pegler) ; Shencood Forest
(Blatch and Homer)
Corynetes coeruleus, De G. S. Lcverton, very com-
mon in the old church (Thornley) ; Retford
(Pegler)
LYMEXYLONIDAE
Hylecoetus dermestoides, L. Sherwood Forest, locally
PTINIDAE
Ptinus sexpunctatus, Panz. Nottingham University Col-
lege, 9 November 1897 ; many examples found
feeding on specimens of Draba in a parcel of
dried plants collected by Mr. H. Fisher in
Franz Josef Land. The origin of the insect
is, however, quite uncertain, and may be local
— fur, L.
Niptus hololeucus, Fald.
— crenatus, Fab. Nottingham (Ryles)
Hedobia imperialis, L. S. Leverton, often common
(Thornley) ; Nottingham district (Ryles and
Freestone)
Dryophilus pusillus, Gyll. \
— anobioides, Chevr. J
Priobium castaneum, Fab.
Anobium domesticum, Fourc.
— fulvicorne, Sturm. Beeston (Ryles) ; S. Levertoit
(Thornley)
— paniceum, L.
R
I03
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
PTINIDAE (continued)
Xestoblum tessellatum, Fab. S. Leverton, was common
in the old church (Thornley) ; Retford (Pegler) ;
Cokatck (Ryles)
Ernobius mollis, L.
Ptilinus pectinicornis, L.
Ochina hederae, Moll. Chilwell (Ryles) ; Retford
.(Pegler)
Xyletinus ater, Panz. On old palings at Newark, not
uncommon (Hadfield ; Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv,
195)
Dorcatoma flavicornis, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Mat-
thews ; Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv, 198)
Anitys rubens, Hoff. Sherwood Forest (Rev. A. Mat-
thews, Dr. Chaster, and J. R. le B. Tomlin)
BOSTRICHIDAE
Rhizopertha pusilla, Fab. Old corn mill, Retford
(Pegler)
Bostrichus capucinus, L. ' Nottinghamshire? Stephens
(Fowler, Brit. Coleop. iv, 201)
LYCTIDAE
Lyctus canaliculatus, Fab. Worksop (Houghton) ;
' Very abundant during the summer in Notting-
hamshire ; Dr. Howitt ' (Stephens)
— brunneus, Steph. ' Nottingham, one specimen in
a shop window, 1829 ; Dr. Howitt' (Stephens)
SPHINDIDAE
Sphindus dubius, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (J. K.Taylor
and Blatch)
CISSIDAE
Cis boleti, Scop.
— micans, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Chaster,
Tomlin, etc.)
- hispidus, Payk. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and Hor-
ner, Chaster)
- bidentatus, Ol. Retford (Pegler) ; Sherwood Forest
(Blatch and Homer)
— nitidus, Herbst.^ „, , r /mi. j
- festivus Panz. \Sh^ /«*" (Blatch and
- fuscatus, Mell. J H°rner>
Ennearthron cornutum, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Chas-
ter)
Octotemnus glabriculus, Gyll.
CERAMBYCIDAE
Aromia moschata, L. Nottingham and Retford districts
Callidium violaceum, L. Ruddington (W. H. Free-
stone) ; Worksop (Houghton)
- variabile, L. Sherwood Forest (Blatch, Tomlin)
Clytus arietis, L.
— mysticus, L. Chilwell (Ryles) ; S. Leverton
(Thornley) ; Retford (Pegler)
[Cyllene crinicornis, Chev. A fine example of this
Central American longicorn was captured in
Retford railway station in September, 1899,
and taken to Mr. Stephen Pegler. It was
identified by Mr. E. J. Gahan of the British
Museum]
Gracilia minuta, Fab. Retford, in great quantity in
an old hamper (Pegler)
Molorchus umbellatarum, L. Kingston-on-Soar, August
1903 (Thornley)
CERAMBYCIDAE (continued)
Rhagium bifasciatum, Fab.
Toxotus meridianus, Panz.
Leptura scutellata, Fab. Sherwood Forest, June, 1869
(J. K. Taylor)
— livida, Fab. Cottam, 6 July, 1901 (Eland Shaw)
Strangalia quadrifasciata, L. Langford Moor ; Sher-
wood Forest
— armata, Herbst. Treswell Wood, rather common ;
Sherwood Forest ; Wellow Park
Grammoptera tabacicolor, De G. Treswell and Gring-
ley Woods (Thornley) ; Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
— analis, Panz. Colwick (Ryles)
— ruficornis, Fab.
Acanthocinus aedilis, L. Cossall ; Wilford ; Clifton;
in all cases not far from a colliery, and probably
imported in pit-props ; Worksop (Houghton)
Leiopus nebulosus, L. Bramcote and Sherwood Forest
(Ryles) ; S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Clumber
(Pegler)
Pogonochaerus bidentatus, Thorns. S. Leverton, not
uncommon in late autumn (Thornley)
— dentatus, Fourc. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Monochammus sutor, L. Near Clifton colliery, Not-
tingham, one specimen, probably imported
(Walker)
Saperda carcharias, L. Worksop (Houghton); Cinder
Hill
— scalaris, L. Sherwood Forest, June, 1869 (J. K.
Taylor), and two specimens in 1889 (W. G.
Blatch) ; also taken by Mr. Tomlin and
Dr. Chaster
Tetrops praeusta, L.
Stenostola ferrea, Schrank. Taken at Nottingham,
abundantly in June, 1828, sparingly in 1829
(G. Howitt: see Entomologist for 1878, p. 177).
Near Nottingham, 1831 (A. H. Davis in Lou-
don's Mag. N. //.April, 1832) ; Newark (Fow-
ler, Brit, Coleop. iv, 254)
Phytoecia cylindrica, L. Newark (Hadfield ; Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. iv, 255)
BRUCHIDAE
Bruchus rufimanus, Boh.
— villosus, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
CHRYSOMELIDAE
Donacia simplex, Fab.
— semicuprea, Panz. Canal, Retford, common
(Thornley) ; Wollaton Canal (Ryles) ; Worksop
(Houghton)
— sericea, L.
Haemonia appendiculata, Panz. (= equiseti, Fab.)
Holme Pierrepont, one specimen (W. H. Free-
stone, confirmed by Rev. A. Thornley)
Lema lichenis, Voet. Nottingham and Retford districts
— melanopa, L.
Crioceris lilii, Scop. (=merdigera, Fab.) Newark dis-
trict (?) [Hadfield coll.]
Cryptocephalus coryli, L. Langfird Moor, a single
specimen beaten from birch, 29 June, 1899
(Thornley)
— pusillus, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. iv, 295)
— labiatus, L.
— querceti, Suffr. Sherwood Forest (Matthews, Blatch,
Ryles, and others)
104
INSECTS
CHRYSOMELIDAE (continued')
Timarcha tenebricosa, Fab.
— violaceonigra, De G.
Chrysomela staphylea, L.
— polita, L.
— orichalcia, Mall. S. Leverton (Thornley)
„ var. hobsoni, Steph. Nottingham (B. S. Dodd)
— goettingensis, L. Sherwood Forest (Fowler)
— fastuosa, Scop. Ruddington (Ryles and others)
— didymata, Scriba. Barrow Hills, Everton, 1 1 July,
1903 (Thornley)
— hyperici, Forst. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Sher-
wood forest (Ryles)
Phytodecta viminalis, L. Newark district (?) [Had-
field coll.]
— olivacea, Forst.
Gastroidea viridula, De G.
— polygon!, L.
Phaedon tumidulus, Germ.
— cochleariae, Fab.
Phyllodecta vulgatissima, L.
— vitellinae, L.
Hydrothassa aucta, Fab. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
— marginella, L.
Prasocuris junci, Brahm
— phellandrii, L.
Phyllobrotica quadrimaculata, L. Retford (Pegler)
Luperus rufipes, Scop.
— flavipes, L.
Lochmaea suturalis, Thorns. Retford district (Pegler)
— crataegi, Forst. Clumber (Pegler)
Galerucella nymphaeae, L. S. Leverton (Thornley)
— lineola, Fab. S. Leverton; Rampton ; Cottam;
common (Thornley)
Adimonia tanaceti, L. Barrow Hills, Everton, in pro-
fusion, 1902 (Thornley)
Sermyla halensis, L.
Longitarsus anchusae, Payk. Clumber (Pegler)
— holsaticus, L. Newark district (?) [Hadfield coll.]
— luridus, Scop.
— suturellus, Duft.
„ var. fuscicollis, Steph.
— atricillus, L. Retford district (Thornley)
— melanocephalus, All.
— flavicornis, Steph. \Newark district (?) [Hadfield
— tabidus, Fab. J coll.]
— jacobaeae, Wat.
— gracilis, Kuts. Kings ton-on-Soar, common (Thorn-
ley)
— laevis, Duft. S. Leverton, common (Thornley)
Haltica lythri, Aube \Newark district (?) [Hadfield
- pusilla, Duft. J coll.]
Phyllotreta nodicornis, Marsh. Nottingham and Rad-
cliffe (Ryles)
— consobrina, Curt. ) Newark district (?) [Had-
— punctulata, Marsh, j field coll.]
— vittula, Redt. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
- undulata, Kuts.
— nemorum, L.
— ochripes, Curt. Newark district (?) [Hadfield
coll.]
— tetrastigma, Com. Clumber (Pegler)
- exclamationis, Thunb.
Aphthona nonstriata, Goeze. Newark district (?)
[Hadfield coll.]
— atrocoerulea, Steph. S. Leverton (Thornley)
Batophila rubi, Payk. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Retford
(Pegler) ; Radcliffe (Ryles)
CHRYSOMELIDAE (continued}
Sphaeroderma testaceum, Fab.
— cardui, Gyll.
Apteropeda orbiculata, Marsh.
Mantura rustica, L.
— matthewsi, Curt. Newark district (?) FHadfield
coll.]
Crepidodera transversa, Marsh.
— ferruginea, Scop.
— rufipes, L.
— aurata, Marsh.
Chaetocnema subcoerulea, Kuts. Newark district (?)
[Hadfield coll.]
— hortensis, Fourc.
Plectroscelis concinna, Marsh.
Psylliodes attenuata, Koch.) Newark district (?) [Had-
— chrysocephala, L. J field coll.]
— napi, Koch.
— cuprea, Koch.
— affinis, Payk.
— marcida, 111. Newark district (?) [Hadfield coll.]
— luteola, Milll. Sherwood Forest, Rev. A. Mat-
thews (Fowler, Brit. Coleof. iv, 394)
— picina, Marsh. Tuxford (Pegler)
Cassida vittata, Vill.
— flaveola, Thunb.
— viridis, Fab.
TENEBRIONIDAE
Blaps mucronata, Latr.
Heledona agaricola, Fab. Sherwood Forest
Scaphidema metallicum, Fab. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Beeston and Radcliffe (Ryles)
Tenebrio molitor, L.
— obscurus, Fab. Nottingham (Ryles) ; Retford
(Pegler)
Gnathocerus cornutus, Fab. Nottingham, Worksof,
and Retford districts
Tribolium ferrugineum, Fab. Retford, in old flour
mill (Pegler)
Hypophloeus castaneus, Fab. Nottingham, 30 Novem-
ber, 1835, R. Bakewell (Stephens, Ent. Mag.
January, 1836, iii, 415) ; Shem-ood Forest, June,
1869 and 1870 (J. K. Taylor); also taken there
subsequently by various collectors (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. v, 22)
Helops striatus, Fourc.
CISTELIDAE
Cistela ceramboides, L. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleof. v, 29, and Tomlin)
— murina, L.
Eryx ater, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Mycetochares bipustulata, 111. Sherwood Forest (Tom-
lin)
Cteniopus sulphureus, L. Barrow Hills, Everton ;
Marnham (Thornley)
LAGRIIDAE
Lagria hirta, L.
MELANDRYIDAE
Tetratoma fungorum, Fab. Nottingham, 1898-99,
in abundance (Ryles) ; Sherwood Forest
— desmaresti, Latr. Sherwood Forest (Matthews and
Blatch)
105
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
MELANDRYIDAE (continued)
Clinocara undulata, Kr. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Tomlin)
Hallomenus humeralis, Panz. Sherwood Forest (Tom-
lin)
Conopalpus testaceus, OL, and var. vigorsi, Steph.
Sherwood Forest
Melandrya caraboides, L. Nottingham (Ryles) ; S.
Leverton (Thornley)
Phloeotrya rufipes, Gyll. Sherwood Forest
PYTHIDAE
S.ilpingus castaneus, Panz. Clumber (Pegler)
— planirostris, Fab.
OEDEMERIDAE
Retford districts.
Clumber (Pegler)
Clifton Grove, Nottingham
Oedemera nobilis, Scop.
Ischnomera coerulea, L.
(Ryles)
— sanguinicollis, Fab. Sherwood Forest, on mountain
ash flowers (Blatch)
PYROCHROIDAE
Pyrochroa serraticornis, Scop.
SCRAPTIIDAE
Scraptia fuscula, Mull. Sherwood Forest, June, 1870
(J. Kidson Taylor)
MORDELLIDAE
Anaspis frontalis, L.
— rufilabris, Gyll. Aspley Woods, Nottingham (Ryles)
— geoffroyi, Mllll. Nottingham ; Gunthorpe (Ryles) ;
Retford district, common (Thornley)
— ruficollis, Fab.
— subtestacea, Steph. 'Nottingham (Ryles) ; S. Lever-
ton (Thornley) ; Retford (Pegler)
— maculata, Fourc.
ANTHICIDAE
Anthicus floralis, L.
— antherinus, L. Newark district (?) [Hadfield coll.]
XYLOPHILIDAE
Xylophilus oculatus, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. v, 92)
MELO'lDAE
Meloe proscarabaeus, L.
— violaceus, Marsh. Bulwell Forest
ANTHRIBIDAE
Brachytarsus fasciatus, Forst. Occurs in many places
— varius, Fab. Langjbrd Moor, not uncommon on
fin ; S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood (Thornley) ;
Sherwood Forest (Ryles, Chaster, and Tomlin)
CURCULIONIDAE
Apoderus coryli, L. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
Attelabus curculionoides, L. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
CURCULIONIDAE (continued)
Rhynchites cupreus, L. Sherwood Forest (Stevens,
Blatch, and others)
— aequatus, L. RadcRffe-on-Trent (Ryles) ; S. Lever-
ton (Thornley) ; Retford (Pegler)
— aeneovirens, Marsh. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. v, 124, and Tomlin)
— minutus, Herbst. S. Leverton, common (Thorn-
ley) ; Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
— interpunctatus, Steph. Newark district (?) [Had-
field coll.]
— nanus, Paylc.
— pubescens, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Ryles) ; Gam-
ston Wood (Pegler)
Deporaus megacephalus, Germ. Langford Moor, on
birch with next species (Thornley)
— betulae, L.
Apion pomonae, Fab.
— craccae, L. S. Leverton and Treswell Wood (Thorn-
ley) ; Hazelford (Ryles)
— subulatum, Kirby. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
— ulicis, Forst.
— miniatum, Germ.
— cruentatum, Walt. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
— haematodes, Kirby
— rubens, Steph. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. v, 143)
— viciae, Payk. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
— difforme, Germ. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
— apricans, Herbst.
— dichroum, Bedel
— nigritarse, Kirby
— hookeri, Kirby. Treswell Wood (Thornley) ;
Grove (Pegler)
— aeneum, Fab.
— radiolus, Kirby
— onopordi, Kirby
— carduorum, Kirby
— virens, Herbst.
— astragali, Payk. Cottam, in a grass field (Pegler)
— pisi, Fab.
— aethiops, Herbst.
— striatum, Kirby
— immune, Kirby. Gravel-pit, Sutton, near Retford
(Thornley)
— ervi, Kirby
— vorax, Herbst.
— seniculum, Kirby
— simile, Kirby. Grove (Pegler;
— marchicum, Herbst. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Ryles)
— violaceum, Kirby
— hydrolapathi, Kirby
- humile, Germ.
Otiorrhynchus atroapterus, De G. Newark district (?)
[Hadfield coll.]
— raucus, Fab. Clumber (Pegler)
— ligneus, OL Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop.
v, 178)
— picipes, Fab.
— sulcatus, Fab.
— ovatus, L.
Trachyphloeus scabriculus, L. Newark district (?)
[Hadfield coll.]
Strophosomus coryli, Fab.
— capitatus, De G.
— retusus, Marsh.
— faber, Herbst. Newark district (?) [Hadfield coll.]
106
INSECTS
CURCULIONIDAE (continued)
Exomias araneifbrmis, Schr.
Omias mollinus, Boh. S. Leverton, common in hay-
fields (Thornley)
Brachysomus echinatus, Bonsd. S. Leverton (Thorn-
ley) ; Clumber (Pegler)
Sciaphilus muricatus, Fab.
Tropiphorus tomentosus, Marsh. S. Leverton (Thorn-
ley) ; Beeston (Ryles) ; Nottingham (Pope)
Liophloeus nubilus, Fab.
Polydrusus micans, Fab. Nottingham (Ryles) ; Tres-
well Wood (Thornley)
— pterygomalis, Boh.
— cervinus, L.
Phyllobius oblongus, L.
— calcaratus, Fab.
— urticae, De G.
— pyri, L.
— argentatus, L.
— maculicornis, Germ.
— pomonae, Ol.
— viridiaeris, Laich.
Tanymecus palliatus, Fab. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Grove (Pegler)
Philopedon geminatus, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
Atactogenus exaratus, Marsh. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. v, 209)
Barynotus obscurus, Fab.
— schonherri, Zett. Newark district (?) [Hadfield
coll.]
— elevatus, Marsh. Widely distributed and common
in places
Alophus triguttatus, Fab.
Sitones regensteinensis, Herbst.
— crinitus, Herbst. Broadholme (Pegler)
— tibialis, Herbst.
— hispidulus, Fab.
— humeralis, Steph. Barrow Hills, Everton, 4 Sep-
tember, 1903
— meliloti, Walt. Colaiick (Ryles)
— flavescens, Marsh.
— puncticollis, Steph.
— suturalis, Steph.
— lineatus, L.
— sulcifrons, Thunb.
Gronops lunatus, L. Newark district (?) [Hadfield
coll.]
Hypera punctata, Fab.
— rumicis, L.
— polygon!, L.
— suspiciosa, Herbst. Retford (Pegler) ; Sherwcod
Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. v, 234)
— variabilis, Herbst.
— murina, Fab. Clumber (Pegler)
— plantaginis, De G.
— trilineata, Marsh. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
— nigrirostris, Fab.
Liosoma ovatulum, Clairv.
Hylobius abietis, L.
Tracodes hispidus, L. Sherwood Forest (Tomlin)
Orchestes quercus, L.
— alni, L. Nottingham (Freestone) ; Sherwood Forest
(Ryles)
„ var. ferrugineus, Marsh. Nottingham (Ryles)
— ilicis, Fab, var. nigripes, Fowler. Treswell Wood
(Thornley)
— avellanae, Don. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. v, 260)
CURCULIONIDAE (continued)
Orchestes fagi, L.
— rusci, Herbst. Newark district (?) [Hadfield coll.]
— stigma, Germ. Treswell Wood (Thornley)
I* • T
— sahcis, L.
Rhamphus flavicornis, Clairv.
Grypidius equiseti, Fab. Aspley, Nottingham (Ryles) ;
S. Leverton and Treswell (Thornley)
Erirrhinus bimaculatus, Fab. Clifton Grove, Notting-
ham (Pope)
— acridulus, L.
Dorytomus vorax, Fab. Nottingham and Retford dis-
tricts
— tortrix, L. Nottingham (Pope)
— maculatus, Marsh.
— melanophthalmus, Payk, var. agnathus, Boh.
Littleborough
Tanysphyrus lemnae, Fab.
Bagous alismatis, Marsh. S. Leverton (Thornley) ;
Cossall
Anoplus plantaris, Naez.
Elleschus bipunctatus, L. Newark district (?) [Had-
field coll.]
Tychius meliloti, Steph. Newark, in profusion on
Melilotus officinalis in brickyard (Thornley and
Carr)
Miccotrogus picirostris, Fab.
Gymnetron pascuorum, Gyll. Retford district (Pegler) ;
Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Chaster, and Tomlin) ;
Worksop (Houghton)
— antirrhini, Payk. Trent-bank, Rampton, in flowers
of Linaria vulgaris, common
Mecinus pyraster, Herbst.
Anthonomus ulmi, De G.
— pedicularius, L.
— pomorum, L.
— rubi, Herbst.
Nanophyes lythri, Fab. Newark district (?) [Hadfield
coll.]
Cionus scrophulariae, L. Common in many localities
on Scrophuhria nodosa and S. aquatica
— tuberculosus, Scop. Newark district (?) [Hadfield
coll.]
— hortulanus, Marsh. Treswell Wood, on Scroph.
nodosa
— blattariae, Fab.
— pulchellus, Herbst.
Orobitis cyaneus, L. On violets, Treswell Wood
(Thornley); Clumber Park (Pegler)
Cryptorrhynchus lapathi, L. Nottingham (Pope) ;
Littleborough (Thornley)
Acalles ptinoides, Marsh. Newark district (?) [Had-
field coll.]
Coeliodes rubicundus, Herbst. Sherwood Forest
(Ryles)
— quercus, Fab.
— erythroleucus, Gmel. Littleborough (Thornley)
— quadrimaculatus, L.
— geranii, Payk. N. Leverton and Treswell, on
Geranium pratense (Thornley)
Poophagus sisymbrii, Fab.
— nasturtii, Germ. Nottinghamshire (Stephens)
Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis, Payk.
— cochleariae, Gyll. Nottingham (Ryles)
— ericae, Gvll. Newark district (?) [Hadfield coll.]
— erysimi, Fab.
— contractus, Marsh.
— chalybaeus, Germ. Retford district (Pegler)
107
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
CURCULIONIDAE (continued')
Ceuthorrhynchus quadridens, Panz. S. Leverton
(Thornley) ; Widmerpool (Ryles)
— pollinarius, Forst.
— viduatus, Gyll. Sherwood Forest (Hardy ; Fowler,
Brit. Ctleop. v, 252)
— pleurostigma, Marsh.
— alliariae, Bris. S. Leverton and Retford (Thornley)
— melanostictus, Marsh. Retford district (Pegler)
— arcuatus, Herbst. Sherwood Forest (Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. v, 257)
— litura, Fab.
Ceuthorrhynchidius floralis, Payk.
— pyrrhorhynchus, Marsh. Beeston (Ryles)
- horridus, Fab. Newark district (?) [Hadfield coll.]
— troglodytes, Fab.
Rhinoncus pericarpius, L.
— gramineus, Herbst. Cottam and Retford (Pegler)
— perpendicularis, Reich.
— castor, Fab. Liltleborough (Thornley) ; Sherwood
Forest
Litodactylus leucogaster, Marsh. Sherwood Forest
(Ryles and Pegler)
Phytobius quadrituberculatus, Fab.
Baris lepidii, Germ. Hazclford (Ryles)
Balaninus venosus, Grav. Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Brit. Coleop. v, 384)
- nucum, L. S. Leverton (Thornley) ; Sherwood
Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. v, 385)
— turbatus, Gyll. Newark district (?) [Hadfield
coll.]
— villosus, Fab. Treswcl! Wood (Thornley) ; N.
Leverton (E. Shaw) ; Sherwood Forest (Fowler
and Tomlin)
CURCULIONIDAE (continued)
Nottingham (Ryles) ; S.
Sherwood Forest (Fowler,
Balaninus salicovorus, Payk.
— pyrrhoceras, Marsh.
Magdalis armigera, Fourc.
Leverton (Thornley) ;
Brit. Coleop. v, 398 ; and Chaster)
— pruni, L.
Calandra granaria, L.
— oryzae, L.
Cossonus ferrugineus, Clairv. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Rhyncolus lignarius, Marsh. Grove (Pegler) ; Sher-
wood Forest (Blatch and Tomlin)
— gracilis, Ros. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— ater, L. Sherwood Forest (Turner ; Fowler, Brit.
Coleop. v, 394)
SCOLYTIDAE
Scolytus destructor, Ol.
— intricatus, Ratz. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
— multistriatus, Marsh. Sherwood Forest (Chaster and
Tomlin)
Hylastes ater, Payk.
— opacus, Er. Worksop (Houghton) ; Sherwood
Forest (Fowler, Brit. Coleop. v, 413)
Hylesinus crenatus, Fab. Tuxford (Pegler) ; Worksop
(Houghton)
— oleiperda, Fab. Burton Joyce (Ryles)
— fraxini, Panz.
Myelophilus piniperda, L.
Dryocaetes villosus, Fab.
Tomicus laricis, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Trypodendron domesticum, L. Sherwood Forest, etc.
— quercus, Eich. Sherwood Forest (Blatch and
Homer)
LEPIDOPTERA
The insects belonging to this group have, as usual, owing to their attractive appearance,
received more attention from collectors than the other orders ; but although our knowledge of the
butterflies and larger moths of the county is now fairly complete, much still remains to be done
before anything like an exhaustive list of the so-called Micro-Lepidoptera can be given. The earliest
published account of Nottinghamshire Lepidoptera is contained in White's Worktop, the Dukery, and
Sherwood Forest, published in 1875. In this work two lists are given, one by W. J. Sterland of
' Lepidoptera taken in Sherwood Forest by the late John Trueman ' ; the other, by R. E. Brameld,
enumerates the species captured by himself ' in or about Sherwood Forest, from 1859 to 1874.'
Mr. Sterland's list, although it professes to include only those species which Trueman himself
collected within the limits of the forest, contains so many improbable records that one is forced to
the conclusion that numerous species are included which were collected by Trueman in other parts
of the kingdom or received by him from correspondents. I have therefore felt compelled to ignore
most of Sterland's records unless confirmed by Brameld or later observers. Other lists of Notting-
hamshire Lepidoptera have been published by the present writer * and by Mr. J. R. Hardy.3
In addition to the information derived from these sources I have received much help from
numerous entomological friends and correspondents. My thanks are especially due to Miss Alderson
of Worksop, whose labours in the Worksop and Sherwood Forest districts have resulted in the
addition of very many new species to the county records, and whose co-operation in this work has
been of the utmost value ; to the Rev. Alfred Thornley, whose unrivalled knowledge of the insect
fauna of Nottinghamshire has been freely placed at my disposal ; and also to the Revs. E. G. Alderson
and W. Becher, and Messrs. B. A. Bower, W. Daws, J. R. Hardy, G. Henderson, J. T. Houghton,
A. R. Leivers, D. H. Pearson, G. Pike, and A. Simmons. To all these friends I am indebted for
much valuable and generous assistance.
The arrangement and nomenclature adopted in this list are those of South's 'Entomologist' List
of British Lepidoptera. Of the 2,081 species therein enumerated, 903 species have been recorded
on good authority as occurring in Nottinghamshire.
1 A Contribution to the Ceology and Natural History of Nottinghamshire, 1893.
' Manchester Memoirs, vol. 45 (1901).
108
INSECTS
RHOPALOCERA
Butter/lies
PIERIDAE
The beautiful Black-veined White (Aporia crataegf) can only be claimed as a Nottinghamshire
insect on the strength of Sterland's statement (' Zoology of Sherwood Forest,' in White's Worhop,
the Dukery, and Sherwood Forest) that ' a single specimen of the Black-veined White (P. crataegi)
was taken by J. Trueman, but he does not give in his memoranda the precise locality, though I
gather it was in Thoresby Park.' The large and small Cabbage Whites (Pierii brassicae and P. rapae)
and the Green-veined White (P. nap!) are all very common both in spring and autumn. The larvae
of P. brassicae have been observed feeding gregariously on horse-radish, Tropaeolum canariense and
other species, as well as on the more usual cabbages and cauliflowers. P. rapae is very partial to
the common garden mignonette, and has also been seen feeding on charlock and horse-radish as well
as the various forms of cabbage. The aberration immaculata of this species occurs occasionally.
P. napi is more partial to the ridings of woods than are the other two species. The Orange Tip
(Euchlo? cardamines) is widely distributed in the county, frequenting the country lanes and wood
ridings ; in some localities it is very common. The aberration turritis frequently occurs. The
favourite food-plants in this district appear to be charlock (Brassica Sinapistrum) and garlic mustard
(Shymbrlum Alllaria). The delicate and fragile-looking Wood White (Leucophasia sinapis) used to
occur occasionally in Sherwood Forest according to Sterland, and a single specimen was taken at
Newark many years ago (G. Gascoyrie, in Newman's British Butterflies). No modern entomologist
has seen it. The Pale Clouded Yellow (Colias hyale) is usually very rare, but occurs in small numbers
at wide intervals. Several were taken at Mansfield in 1875, and at Southwell in 1877, but no more
were seen, as far as I can ascertain, until 1900, when it occurred in several localities in the Notting-
ham district. The Clouded Yellow (C. edusa) is of much more frequent occurrence, occasionally
becoming quite common, but it is very uncertain and erratic. It was common about Mansfield in
1859, occurred at Nottingham in 1875, and in profusion all over the county in 1877. A few
specimens were seen in 1878, 1883, 1885, and 1889 ; and in 1892 it again appeared in numbers
in every part of the county. In 1895 it occurred about Mansfield, accompanied by a few var.
belice (Daws) ; and finally in 1900 it once more appeared in many localities. On the Foss road
at Cotgrave it was so abundant that one collector secured fifty specimens in perfect condition in
two hours on 1 8 August. Gonopteryx rhamn't, the Brimstone butterfly, occurs somewhat sparingly
throughout the county, and is occasionally common, as in 1900.
NYMPHALIDAE
Of the Fritillaries the Pearl-bordered (Argynnis euphrosyne) and Small Pearl-bordered (A. selene)
occur in various localities, the former being much the commoner. A. ag/aia, the Dark Green
Fritillary, is widely distributed, but scarce ; the High Brown Fritillary (A. adippe) is still fairly common
in Sherwood Forest and was formerly so in many places where it is now scarce. The Silver-washed
Fritillary (A. papbia) is now also an uncommon insect, but several specimens were seen in a wood near
Retford in 1901. All the Argynnidae, except perhaps A. euphrosyne, seem indeed to be gradually
getting scarcer in Nottinghamshire. The Greasy Fritillary (Melitaea aurinia) was several times taken
in Sherwood Forest by J. Trueman, according to Sterland, and a single specimen was taken at
Worksop in 1883 by Miss Alderson. The singularly-shaped Comma Butterfly (Vanessa c-album)
seems to have been not uncommon formerly, but is now very rare ; it has occurred in recent years
at Thieves Wood and Mansfield (Daws), and one specimen was taken at Worksop on 15 September,
1893, by Miss Alderson. The Large Tortoiseshell \V. polychloros) is occasionally seen, and the Small
Tortoiseshell (V. urticae) is very common everywhere. The variety ichnusoides has been taken at
Mansfield by Mr. Daws. The Peacock (V. to) is usually very scarce and uncertain in its appearance,
but in 1 900 it was quite common. Records of the occurrence of the Camberwell Beauty (V. an-
tiopa) in Nottinghamshire are fairly numerous : one at Worksop and one at Southwell in 1846, and
one taken some years before near Nottingham (J. Wolley) ; two at Welbeck and two at Edwin-
stowe in 1860 (Sterland). 'In 1860 this species was common about Mansfield. I have two taken
here. A nice series was taken at Berry Hill by the late Lady Walker ; they were feeding on fallen
ripe plums. They were again fairly numerous in 1864' (W. Daws). Several specimens were
taken in Nottinghamshire in 1872 (Brameld), and a specimen was seen flying in Nottingham in or
about 1890. The Red Admiral (V. atalanta) is common throughout the county, in some seasons
extremely so, and the Painted Lady (P, . cardui), though usually very scarce, is sometimes just as
common. It was abundant in 1883 and 1892, and common in South Nottinghamshire in 1900.
It was again common in the autumn of 1903.
109
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
APATURIDAE
The Purple Emperor (Apatura iris) is now rare, but has been seen and taken many times in
various parts of Sherwood Forest. It has also occurred in woods near Newark and Southwell, and at
Thieves Wood near Mansfield Mr. Daws has seen it on several occasions up to 1895.
SATYRIDAE
Another rare species is the Marbled White (Melanargia galatea\ the last specimens of which, as
far as I can learn, were captured near Bingham about 1890. It was formerly common in one or two
places near Tuxford, and also at Warsop and Mansfield, but has apparently died out in all these
places. The Wood Argus (Pararge egeria) occurs sparingly near Mansfield, and has been taken in
the Birklands, also near Carlton-in-Lindrick, and at Widmerpool. The Wall Butterfly (Pararge
megaerd) has almost disappeared from some districts where it was formerly plentiful, but still occurs
rather commonly in the Mansfield district, and I have lately seen it in some numbers in the lanes
about Wigsley and Thorney. The Grayling (Satyrut semele) used to be very abundant on sandy
ground at Thieves Wood, but has not been seen lately (Daws). The Meadow Brown (Epinephele
ianira) is abundant nearly everywhere, and the Gatekeeper (E. tithonus) occurs in profusion in many
places, but is quite absent from some districts and rare in others. The Ringlet (E. hyperanthes) is
also locally common in damp lanes and woods, but like many other butterflies has disappeared from
some districts where it was formerly common. 'About 1882 this species simply swarmed in the
grass ridings of Clumber and Welbeck Parks ; since that time it has entirely disappeared from the
neighbourhood' (Miss Alderson). The Small Heath (Coenonympha pamphilus) is very common and
universally distributed.
LYCAENIDAE
Three of the Hairstreaks occur in Nottinghamshire. Thecla w-album is taken sparingly in
Sherwood Forest and elsewhere in the north, and is locally abundant in the south of the county.
Barrett's statement, ' very rare in Nottinghamshire ' (British Lepidoptera, vol. i, p. 47), is certainly
very far from the truth. The Purple Hairstreak (Thecla quercus) is much less common, but occurs
in Sherwood Forest, in a wood near Mansfield, and in certain woods in the east of the county, in
one of which I have recently seen it flying in considerable numbers round the tops of the oak trees.
The Green Hairstreak (Thecla rubi) also occurs in Sherwood Forest and in woods near Mansfield and
Newark, but in only one place have I seen it in any quantity. The Small Copper (Polyommatus
phloeas) is very common, especially in the dry Triassic sandstone area of the central and northern
parts of the county, and may be seen from the beginning of May until well into October. Some
beautiful varieties have been taken, including the aberration schmidtii. Among the ' Blues '
Lycaena argon used to be common not very many years ago in Clumber Park, and has also been
taken sparingly in one or two places near Mansfield. It is now apparently very rare. The Common
Blue (L. icarus) is widely distributed and abundant in many places, occurring throughout the summer
from early in May until sometimes the end of October. The Holly Blue (L. argiolui) is said by
Sterland to be not uncommon in Sherwood Forest. It certainly is not so now, since no later observer
has seen it, although holly bushes are abundant in parts of Sherwood.
HESPERIIDAE
Of the Skippers, Syrichthus ma/vae, the Grizzled Skipper, occurs rather commonly at Bunny and
about Cotgrave and Widmerpool. It is also found sparingly about Newark, Southwell, Newstead, and
Wellow. The Dingy Skipper (Nisoniades tages] is fairly common in the Mansfield district (Daws),
and occurs rarely in Sherwood Forest. The Small Skipper (Hesperia thaumas) is widely distributed,
often occurring abundantly in the south of the county, but rather more sparingly in the north. I
know of only a single capture of Hesperia lineola in Nottinghamshire, that by Mr. J. N. Young in
1880 at Clumber, as recorded by Barrett (Brit. Lepid. i, 282). The Large Skipper (Hesperia
sylvanus) is locally abundant in woods and lanes in the south of the county, and also near Retford
and Mansfield. In Sherwood Forest and about Worksop, and elsewhere on the Bunter sandstone,
it is much less common. It appears to be at least partially doubled-brooded, occurring from about
I June until the middle of August.
HETEROCERA
Moths
SPHINGES
SPHINGIDAE
The Death's Head Moth (Acherontia atropos) is very irregular in its appearance, some years being
quite common or even abundant, in others almost absent. In 1899 and 1900 it was common
no
INSECTS
throughout the county in the larval stage. The Convolvulus Hawk Moth (Sphinx convolvuli) is another
erratic insect, but is never really common. I have many recent records of its occurrence, singly or
in small numbers, in the Nottingham, Mansfield, Southwell, Tuxford, Edwinstowe, and Worksop
districts. The Privet Hawk Moth (Sphinx ligustri) is of frequent occurrence. A single specimen of
the Bedstraw Hawk Moth (Deilephila galii) is recorded by Sterland as having been taken in Sherwood
Forest. Mr. W. Daws captured two specimens of this species at flowers of honeysuckle in his
garden at Mansfield, on 20 and 24 June, 1 866, and a third specimen was taken in the same neighbour-
hood by another collector about the same date. The rare Choerocampa celerio has been taken several
times in the county, my notes recording captures of single specimens at Chilwell, at Edwinstowe in
1876, at Retford in 1884, and again in 1885, and in Nottingham in 1860 and 1892. The Small
Elephant Hawk Moth (Choerocampa panel/us) occurs most seasons in the Mansfield district (Daws) ;
specimens were also taken at Worksop and Wellow in 1901, and in Nottingham in 1902. The
Large Elephant Hawk (C. elpenor) is much more frequent and generally distributed, larvae being
sometimes fairly common about Mansfield (Daws). The Eyed Hawk (Smerinthus ocellatus) and the
Poplar Hawk (S. populi) are both fairly plentiful, especially in the larval stage, the former feeding on
wild crab and willow, and on apple trees in orchards, and the latter chiefly on poplar, but once found -^
on ash at Worksop (Miss Alderson). S. populi appears to be partially doubled-brooded, eggs deposited
in June, 1898, produced imagines in the following September (Daws). The Lime Hawk (S. ti/iae) is
rare, but is recorded from Mansfield (Daws) and Marnham, where several specimens were bred by the
Rev. E. Cunningham from larvae found on lime trees in his garden. The Humming-Bird Hawk
Moth (Macroglossa stel/atarum) occurs throughout the county and is frequently common. In 1899 and
1900 it was particularly plentiful all over the county. The Broad-bordered Bee Hawk (Macroglossa
fuciformis) occurs in two woods, many miles apart, on the eastern side of the county, and is a recent
addition to our list, the first authentic specimens having been taken in May, 1895. It has since been
seen in all stages, sometimes plentifully.
SESIIDAE
The Hornet Clearwings (Trochiitum aptformis and T. crabroniformis] have both been taken in the
county several times, but are very rare. Of the smaller Clearwings Sesia tipuliformis is widely dis-
tributed and often common in gardens where currant bushes grow, but the other recorded species are
very rare. Sesia asUiformis, S. myopiformis, and S. tulieifirmis are all recorded from Sherwood Forest,
and S. myopiformis has also been taken by Daws at Mansfield.
ZYGAENIDAE
The Forester (Ino stances), at one time common in Sherwood Forest, is now rare there, if
indeed it still exists. It has, however, been taken recently in the south of the county, near Bunny.
Of the Burnets, Zygaena trifolii is reported from Sherwood Forest and Gedling, but is certainly very
rare. Z. lonicerae is in some seasons very plentiful but extremely local in the Mansfield district ;
it also occurs in old pastures at Welham near Retford. The Six-Spot Burnet (Z. filipendulae) is
widely distributed in the county, but has a knack of disappearing suddenly from localities where it
was formerly common. It occurred in a single meadow at Gedling some years ago in the utmost
profusion, but has not been seen there lately. It is also found more or less commonly in the Retford,
Southwell, and Mansfield districts, and in several places south of Nottingham. In Sherwood Forest
it is now apparently rare.
BOMBYCES
NYCTEOLIDAE
Hylophila prasinana occurs throughout the county, but is nowhere common.
NOLIDAE
No/a cucullatella is widely distributed, variable in its appearance, but some years very abundant.
In 1899 it swarmed in gardens at Mansfield, from 20 June to the middle of July (Daws). N. con-
fusalis was taken in the north of Nottinghamshire by Brameld many years ago, but there are no
recent records.
LITHOSIIDAE
Nudaria senex has been taken ' on the railings near the Normanton Hotel [Clumber Park],
several times,' (J. R. Hardy), and N. mundana occurs in Sherwood Forest and near Worksop.
Calligenia miniata, Lithosia mesomella, and L. deplana, are all reported from Sherwood Forest, the
last named only once, however. L. lurideola is widely diffused and common in one or two localities.
Mr. J. R. Hardy took nine specimens of L, complana by beating larches near Worksop, in June,
HI
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
1887, and it was again obtained in the same locality in 1 894. The Large Footman- (Gnopbria quadra]
is said by Sterland to have been taken several times in Sherwood Forest ; and the Red-necked Foot-
man (G. rubricollii) occurs in the same district.
EUCHELIIDAE
The gorgeous Cinnabar Moth (Euchelia jacobaeae) is common in Sherwood Forest and at Langford
Moor, and occurs with more or less frequency in all parts of the county. The conspicuously-
coloured larvae are often very abundant on Senedo jacobaea (Ragwort).
CHELONIIDAE
The Clouded Buff (Nemeophila russula) was common in Clumber Park within the last twenty
years, but is now scarce there. It was also taken in Mansfield Forest in 1886 and 1887, and has
occurred recently at Ollerton. The Wood Tiger (N. plantaginh) occurs at Thieves Wood near
Mansfield (Daws), and I took a specimen in a wood on the opposite side of the county on 26 May,
1896. It used to occur in Sherwood Forest, but has not been seen there of late years. The Common
Tiger (Arctia caia) is found commonly throughout the county, but is much more abundant in the
larval than in the perfect stage. The Ruby Tiger (Spilosoma fo/iginosa) occurs sparingly in Sher-
wood Forest and in the Mansfield and Nottingham districts. Of the Ermines Spi/osoma mendica is
occasionally taken in various places in the northern half of the county, and S. lubricipeda and
S. menthastri are common and universally distributed.
HEPIALIDAE
All the British ' Swifts ' occur with us. Hepialus humuli is common everywhere, and
H. sylvanus moderately so. H. velleda occurs abundantly and in great variety (including the var.
carnus) in Clumber Park and the woods at Sparken Hill near Worksop (Miss Alderson) ; elsewhere
in the county it is only occasionally found. H. lupulinus and H, hectus are both very common and
universally distributed.
COSSIDAE
The Goat Moth (Cossus ligntperda) occurs commonly in many places in the larval state, and
the imago is frequently taken. The Leopard Moth (Zeuzera pyrina) is not rare, and has occurred
all over the county.
COCHLIOPODIDAE
The rare Heterogenea asella is said by Sterland to have been taken ' in Trueman's garden at
Edwinstowe ' — a statement hard to believe.
LIPARIDAE
The Brown-Tail Moth (Portbesta cbrysorrhoea) has occurred in several places, and the Gold-
Tail (P. iimilis) is generally abundant. The Satin Moth (Leucoma salicis) and the Black Arches
(Psi/ura monacha] occur in the county, but are rare. The Pale Tussock (Dasychira pudibunda] is
rather frequent in Sherwood Forest and one or two other localities, but the Dark Tussock
(D. fascelina) is recorded only by Sterland and must be considered doubtful. The Vapourer (Orgyia
antiqua) is found everywhere, and is often so abundant as to be a destructive pest in gardens.
Mr. J. R. Hardy some years ago took several larvae of 0. gonostigma at Edwinstowe from which
two males and a female were bred.
BOMBYCIDAE
Trichiura crataegi occurs sparingly throughout the county, and is usually captured at gas lamps
or in the larval stage on hawthorn hedges. The December Moth (Poecilocampa populi] is irregular
in appearance, but is sometimes seen in abundance on gas-lamps in various places. Eriogaster lanestrls
is widely diffused, the nests of the gregarious larvae being often very abundant ; the moth is
however rarely seen. Larvae of the Lackey (Bombyx neustria) are also frequently common. Botnbyx
rubi is rare, and recorded from Sherwood Forest only, but B. quercus (the Oak Eggar) is frequent
and sometimes common in both larval and perfect states. The Drinker (Odonestis potatoria] is very
common, especially in the larval stage. The Lappet (Lasiocampa quercifolia) has been taken in the
larval stage at Mansfield by Daws.
SATURNIIDAE
The Emperor Moth (Saturnta pavonia), once common, has now become rare.
112
INSECTS
DREPANULIDAE
Drepana falcataria is frequent in Sherwood Forest and about Mansfield, and rather common at
Langford Moor. Cilix glaucata is found throughout the county, and is occasionally very common
in some districts.
DICRANURIDAE
The Kittens, Dicranura furcula and D. bifida both occur, though not commonly, but the Puss
Moth (D. vinula) is much more plentiful. The Lobster Moth (Stauropus fagi) has been taken in
the larval stage in Sherwood Forest.
NOTODONTIDAE
Pterostoma palpina is rare, Lophopteryx camelina of frequent occurrence, and Notodonta dictaea,
N. dictaeoideSy N. dromedarius, N. ziczac, N. trepida, N. chaonia, and N. trimacu/a, are all found in
the county.
PYGAERIDAE
Phalera bucephala is universally distributed and is often excessively abundant in the larval stage.
Pygaera curtula is recorded for Sherwood Forest by Sterland.
CYMATOPHORIDAE
Tbyatira derasa and T. bath (the Peach Blossom) are of frequent occurrence, and sometimes
fairly common. Cymatophora or and C. duplaris have both been taken in Sherwood Forest and at
Thieves Wood near Mansfield, though only very occasionally. Aiphalia diluta is confined to
Sherwood Forest so far as Nottinghamshire is concerned, and may generally be taken in small
numbers at 'sugar' in the proper season. A.flavicornh is sometimes common about Worksop and
in the Forest, and occurs also at S. Leverton and at Thieves Wood near Mansfield. A. ridens rested
upon Sterland's authority alone until 1894, when one specimen was taken by Miss Alderson in
Clumber Park.
NOCTUAE
BRYOPH1LIDAE
Bryophila per/a is widely distributed and fairly common, but no other species of the genus
occurs in the county.
BOMBYCOIDAE
Demas coryli has been taken at Ollerton and Mansfield. Acronycta tridem is rather scarce.
A. psi is common everywhere. A. leporina occurs at Langford Moor, in Sherwood Forest, and at
Thieves Wood near Mansfield, where Mr. Daws has taken both the type and the variety brady-
porina. A. aceris is recorded for South Scarle by Mr. G. M. A. Hewett, who states that he has
taken it both in spring and autumn. A. megacephala is curiously scarce in Nottinghamshire : I
have very few records of its occurrence, and most of these are for larvae only. A. aim is occasion-
ally taken, most frequently in the larval state ; my numerous records for the last thirty years show
that it has occurred all over the county. A. ligustri is very rare, but has been taken in Sherwood
Forest. A. rumicis is frequently taken, but cannot be called common. Mr. J. R. Hardy tells
me that in July, 1897, he took seven specimens of A. menyanthidis among heather at Edwinstowe,
and has also taken the larvae several times by sweeping in the same place. Diloba caeruleocephala is
abundant nearly everywhere, the moth sometimes swarming on gas-lamps, and the larvae occurring
in profusion on the hawthorn hedges.
LEUCANIIDAE
Of the ' wainscots ' we have Leucania turca (one specimen under log near the Major Oak,
Edwinstowe, 19 June, 1896, J. R. Hardy), L. conigera, L. /ithargyria, L. comma, L. imfura, and
L. pa/lens, most of which are common, the last named in particular being sometimes excessively
abundant. Tapinosto/a fulva and Nonagria arundinis are of frequent occurrence, and Mr. Daws of
Mansfield writes of N. lutosay 'I have a series taken in my garden here at sugar, 12 August, 1894.'
APAMEIDAE
Gortyna ochracea, Hydroecia nictttans, H. micacea, Axylia putris, Xylophasia rurea with its var.
alopecurus, X. lithoxylea, X. suh/ustris, and X. bepatica, are all more or less common ; X. monoglypha
is abundant everywhere and extremely variable, and X. scolopacina occurs sparingly in Sherwood
Forest and at Mansfield. Neuria reticulata and Neuroma popularis are not uncommon. Charaeas
graminis is widely distributed and abounds in some seasons in Sherwood Forest, where it frequents
I 113 15
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
the Ragwort flowers by day, while in other years it is scarce. Cerigo matura is widely distributed
but not very common. Luperina testacea is common, but L. capitil seems to be almost confined to
Sherwood Forest, where it is of frequent occurrence. Mamestra sordida is widely distributed, and
by no means rare. M. albicolon formerly occurred in Sherwood Forest, but has not been seen of
late years. M. furva, recorded by Sterland as having been taken on one occasion in Sherwood
Forest, remained unconfirmed for many years, but in 1891 was taken by the Rev. E. G. Alderson
at Sparken Hill near Worksop, and again on 30 June, 1894, by Miss E. M. Alderson in the garden
at Park House, Worksop. M. brassicae, the well-known Cabbage Moth, is of course very common
everywhere ; the vars. unico/or, Tutt, and albidilinea, Haw., have also occurred. M. persicariae is
common in some parts of the county, but appears to be absent from others. Apamea basilinea,
A. gemina, and A. didyma are common. Several specimens of A. connexa were taken between
Worksop and Edwinstowe in 1885 and 1886 by Mr. J. R. Hardy and others. A. unanimis has
occurred at Chilwell and in Sherwood Forest, and A. leucostigma var. fibrosa is reported by both
Sterland and Brameld from Sherwood Forest, but has not been seen for many years. Miana
strigi/is is abundant ; M. fasciuncu/a and M . arcuosa pretty common ; but M. /iterosa, formerly common
in Sherwood Forest, does not appear to have been taken lately ; and the same may be said of
M. bicolaria, formerly reported ' common ' in the Forest and at Nottingham.
CARADRINIDAE
Grammesia trigrammica is moderately common. Stilbia anoma/a, recorded by Sterland, was
again taken in Clumber Park by Miss Alderson on 23 August, 1895. Caradrina morpkeus,
C. taraxaciy and C. quadripunctata all occur with greater or less frequency, and C. a/sines was
captured at Shireoaks near Worksop in July, 1900, by Mr. J. T. Houghton. Rusina tenebrosa is
frequent, especially in the northern parts of the county.
NOCTUIDAE
The genus Agrotis is well represented. A. vestigia/is, generally a coast insect, has been taken
in Sherwood Forest, and Mr. Daws captured one at Mansfield at ' sugar ' on 1 1 July, 1894. A. suffusa
and A. saucia are frequent, A. segetum very common, A. exclamationis abundant, A. corticea and
A. nigricans not uncommon, A. tritici frequent, and the Rev. W. Becher reports having taken
A, aquilma at Edwinstowe and Wellow. A. obelisca has occurred in Sherwood Forest, according to
Sterland and Brameld, but possibly one of the allied species may have been mistaken for it.
A. agathina is stated by Barrett (Brit. Lepid. iii, 362) to be 'rare in Nottinghamshire,' but I have
no details of its occurrence. A. strigula has been taken frequently at Mansfield and in Sherwood
Forest, and twice at Shireoaks in 1900. A. praecox is said by Sterland to have been taken on one
occasion in Sherwood Forest, but this is probably a mistake ; the Rev. A. Thornley has however
seen an undoubted specimen taken at Marnham in the Trent Valley by the Rev. E. Cunningham.
A. obscura occurs rarely in Sherwood Forest, and has been taken several times recently by
Mr. Thornley at 'sugar' in the vicarage garden at South Leverton. The genus Noctua is also well
represented in Nottinghamshire, N. glareosa occurring sparingly at Mansfield, but sometimes plenti-
fully in Sherwood Forest ; N. augur, N. p/ecta, N. c-nigrum, N. brunnea, N. festiva, N. dahlii,
N. rubi, N. umbrosa, N. baia, and N. xanthographa all occur in various localities, and are most of
them common. N. triangulum is rare, but has been taken in Sherwood Forest by Miss Alderson,
and at Chilwell by Mr. D. H. Pearson. N. castanea, var. neg/ecta, stated by Sterland to be ' not
uncommon ' in Sherwood Forest, is not reported by any other collector. All the species of
Trlphaena are found with us. T. ianthina and T. interjecta are widely distributed but not very
common, the latter indeed being scarce ; T. fimbrta is frequent in Sherwood Forest and about
Mansfield ; T. orbona (subsequa), first recorded by Sterland, has more recently been taken at sugar in
Sherwood Forest on several occasions by Mr. J. R. Hardy ; T. comes is fairly common, and
T. pronuba is everywhere abundant.
AMPHIPYRIDAE
Amphipyra pyramidea is fairly plentiful at 'sugar 'in Sherwood Forest, and has been taken
occasionally at Mansfield. A. tragopoginis is common, and Mania typica fairly so, while M. maura is
not rare.
ORTHOSIIDAE
Panolis piniperda occurs frequently in Scots-pine woods in Sherwood Forest, at Berry Hill,
Mansfield, and at Langford Moor. Pachnobia leucographa formerly occurred, but very rarely, in
Sherwood Forest, but has not been taken recently ; P. rubricosa, once frequent in the same locality,
was again taken in 1899, 1900, and 1901, also in April, 1902,31 South Leverton (Thornley).
114
INSECTS
Taeniocampa gotbica, T. incerta, T. staii/ts, and T. pulverulenta are all common ; T. munda and
T. gracilis frequent, but T. populett and T. miniosa are very rare. We possess all the species of
Orthosia and Anchocelis, but none of the Orthosias are really common. 6. lota is only moderately
so, 0. macihnta frequent, but O. suspecta and 0. upsilon are very rare, and have only been taken in
Sherwood Forest. Anchocelh rufina seems fairly common about Mansfield, and has been taken in
a few other localities ; A. pistadna is decidedly common, A. litura moderately so, and A. lunosa
occurs pretty freely in one or two places, but seems to be local. Cerastis vaccinii, C. spadicea, and
Scoleposoma satellitia are all of common occurrence. The following are rare : — Dasycampa rubiginea
(Mansfield, W. Daws), Oponna croceago (Sherwood Forest, J. R. Hardy), Xanthia citrago (Rufford
Abbey, Rev. W. Becher), and X. aurago (Mansfield, Daws). X. fulvago, X. flavago, and
X. circe/laris are not uncommon, and X. gilvago has occurred frequently in some localities. Cir-
rhoedia xerampelina is occasionally quite common in several localities about Nottingham ; in August
1900 one collector took forty-three specimens in a single evening ! The var. untcolor has also
occurred.
COSMIIDAE
Tethea subtusa and T. retusa are both recorded by Mr. J. R. Hardy as taken by him at sugar
between Worksop and Edwinstowe in July, 1896. One of the most noted Nottinghamshire insects
is Cosmia pa/eacea, which in favourable years is abundant at sugar in Sherwood Forest ; it has also
been taken at Langford Moor. Calymma trapezina is another abundant Sherwood Forest species,
and also occurs, though more sparingly, in several other localities. Calymnia diffinis and C. affinis
are both of frequent occurrence.
HADENIDAE
Eremobia ochroleuca was taken many years ago in Sherwood Forest by Mr. R. E. Brameld.
Dianthoecia capsincola is rather common, especially in the larval stage, but D. cucubali and D. car-
pophaga seem to be rare. Hecatera serena is rare, but formerly occurred in Sherwood Forest, and
three specimens were taken at Basford in 1900 (G. Henderson). Polia chi is common in most
parts of the county but, curiously enough, is not nearly so common at S. Leverton as P. flaviancta,
which the Rev. A. Thornley takes there commonly every year both at sugar and light, although it
is scarcely known in any other part of the county. Dasypolia temp/i, although according to Barrett
' found only in rocky districts, on high hills, and upon the coast,' has several times occurred in
Nottinghamshire. Mr. W. Daws, of Mansfield, reports it as ' taken close to my house at gas
lights, and found amongst gas-coke at Sherwood Foundry, probably attracted by the light from the
furnace, 10 October, 1890." Miss Alderson took one specimen on the doorstep of Park House,
Worksop, about 1894 or 1895, and Mr. D. H. Pearson captured a specimen at a gas-lamp at
Chilwell, on 6 October, 1894. Epunda nigra occurs occasionally at Edwinstowe and Wellow.
C/eoceris vimina/is is found in various localities. MiseKa oxyacanthae is common, the var. capucina
being also of frequent occurrence. Agrieph aprlKna occurs sparingly in Sherwood Forest and about
Mansfield. Euplexia luctpara and Phlogophora meticu/osa are common ; of the latter species
Mr. Daws took a good series at Thieves Wood near Mansfield, between 7 and 10 December,
1895! Of the species of /fp/ecta, which are all found in Nottinghamshire, A. prasina is rare in
Sherwood Forest and at Mansfield, but more frequent in the extreme south of the county ;
A, occulta has occurred singly in Sherwood Forest, at Thieves Wood near Mansfield, and twice
at Southwell ; A. ntbulosa is moderately common ; A. tincta, recorded by Sterland as found
occasionally in Sherwood Forest, has since been taken by Mr. J. R. Hardy, who captured six
specimens among bilberry near Worksop, on 19 June, 1897; and A. advena is taken in several
localities. Hadena oleracea is abundant, and H. adusta, H. protea, H. dentina, H. trifo/ii, H. dis-
similis, H. pisi, H. tha/assina, H. contigua and H. genistae are all found in the county ; while
H. rectilinea is said by Sterland to have been once taken in Sherwood Forest, a not improbable
record, as it used to be taken near Sheffield.
XYLINIDAE
Xylocampa areola occurs at Rufford and Mansfield, and is not uncommon at South Leverton
(Thornley). Calocampa vetusta has been taken recently at Mansfield (Daws) and Chilwell
(Pearson) ; C. exoleta is of frequent occurrence ; and a single example of C. solidaginis is recorded
as taken by Mr. J. R. Hardy in Sherwood Forest on 27 July, 1898. Xyllna ornithopus and
X. soda are extremely rare, the former being recorded, possibly in error, by Sterland only (' occa-
sional in Sherwood Forest '), while a single specimen of the latter is said by Hardy to have been
taken by him near Worksop. Asteroscopus sphinx, also recorded for the Forest by Sterland, was
taken by Daws at Mansfield ('a few at light') on 10 October 1890. Cucullia verbasci is some-
times very common in the larval state in various localities ; C. chamomillae is rather scarce, but
C. umbratica not at all uncommon.
"5
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
GONOPTERIDAE
Gonopttra Kbatrix (the ' Herald ') is not uncommon, and is frequently found hybernating in
outhouses in the winter.
PLUSIIDAE
Habrostola tripartita and H. triplasla, Plusia chrysltis, P. lota and P. pulchrina are all fairly
common, P. ckrysitis often indeed very abundant at Worksop (Miss Alderson) ; P. gamma occurs
some years in the utmost profusion ; P. festucae is rare, and confined to Sherwood Forest ; and
Sterland records P. bractea (' a few times ') and P. interrogationis (' once in a garden at Edwinstowe ')
for the same district.
HELIOTHIDAE
Anarta myrtilU and Heliaca tenebrata are of frequent occurrence, especially the latter, which is
reported by the Rev. A. Thornley to be common at South Leverton in hay-fields, and abundant
in the green drives at Treswell Wood. Hellothis dipsacea has occurred in Sherwood Forest
and at Mansfield (Daws).
POAPHILIDAE
Phytometra viridaria is widely distributed, but not common.
EUCLIDIIDAE
Euclldia mi is rather common, and E. glyphica is by no means rare.
HERMINIIDAE
Zanclognatha grisca/is, Z. tarsipennalis, and Pechypogon barbalh are all of more or less common
occurrence.
HYPENIDAE
Hypena proboscidalis occurs commonly in the county.
BREPHIDES
Brephos partbenias is common in Sherwood Forest and one or two other localities, and B. notha
is recorded by Sterland for Sherwood Forest. The latter record, however, requires confirmation
before it can be accepted.
GEOMETRAE
UROPTERYGIDAE
The Swallow-tail Moth (Uropteryx sambucaria') is fairly common in all parts of the county.
ENNOMIDAE
Epiane apiciaria, although not common, is very widely distributed. Rumia luteolata is very
common everywhere. Ven'dia macularia is rare, the only records being Clumber Park (Miss Alder-
son), Sherwood Forest (Hardy), and Marnham in the Trent Valley (Rev. E. Cunningham).
Angeronia prunaria, another scarce species, which was recorded for Sherwood Forest many years ago
by Sterland, has been taken singly at Ollerton and Edwinstowe by Mr. J. R. Hardy, and sparingly
at Thorney in 1896 by Mr. G. Henderson. Metrocampa margaritaria is well distributed and
frequent. Ellopla prosapiaria is fairly frequent among Scotch firs in Clumber Park, where the
specimens are small and dark-coloured (Miss Alderson), and is scarce about Mansfield and Newark.
Eurymena dolabraria occurs sparingly in Sherwood Forest, and single specimens have recently been
taken at Mansfield, Cotgrave, and Langford Moor. Pericallia syringaria is another scarce species,
met with occasionally about Nottingham, Mansfield, Southwell, Worksop, and Retford. Selenia
bilunaria is fairly common and widely distributed, while S. lunaria is rare, the only recent record
being Worksop (Miss Alderson). Odontopera bidentata is pretty common everywhere, as are Crocallis
e/inguaria and Eugonia alniaria. Eugonia fusca ntaria sometimes occurs rather freely at South Lev-
erton (Thornley), and is also taken about Worksop, Southwell, and Nottingham, but not commonly.
E. quercinaria is found occasionally in Sherwood Forest and other places in the north of the county,
and E. erosaria occurs at Worksop and Chilwell. Himera pennaria is not rare.
AMPHIDASYDAE
Phigalia pedaria is widely distributed and frequent, but Nyssia hispidaria seems confined to the
northern half of the county, having been taken at Worksop, Ollerton, S. Leverton, and Mansfield.
116
INSECTS
Amphidasys strataria has been taken in Clumber Park by Miss Alderson ; at Southwell and Wellow
by the Rev. W. Becher ; and at Thieves Wood near Mansfield by Mr. Daws. A. betularia is far
more common, though more so in the north than in the south of the county ; it is noteworthy that
the var. doubledayaria is much more common than the type, which it seems to be gradually
replacing.
BOARMIIDAE
Hemerophila abruptaria is widely diffused, and in some places common. Boarmia repandata and
B. gcmmaria are well distributed and common, and B. roboraria has been taken in the Forest near
Edwinstowe, and at Thieves Wood near Mansfield. Tephrosia punctularia and T. biundularia
(including crepuscularia) are both rather common, the latter occurring in great variety, some specimens
being almost black.
GEOMETRIDAE
Pseudoterpna prutnc.ta has been taken in several places, and Geometra papilionaria is widely
distributed though not common. Phorodesma pustu/ata is rather scarce, but has been taken in several
localities in both north and south Nottinghamshire. lodis lactearia and Hemithea strigata are pretty
common in certain localities.
EPHYRIDAE
Zonasoma punctaria is frequent ; Z. porata is recorded for the Birklands by Mr. J. R. Hardy ;
Z. linearia is frequent in Sherwood Forest, where also, according to Brameld, Z. annulata is
common ; Z. orbicularia is recorded for the same district by Sterland and Hardy ; and Z. pendularla
occurs in the Forest and elsewhere.
ACIDALIIDAE
Astbena luteata and A. candidata are rather common, and Vcnmia cambrica has been taken at
Worksop by Mr. J. R. Hardy. Acidalla dimidiata, A. bhetata, A. virgu/aria, A. remutaria,
A. imitaria and A. aversata occur in varying degrees of frequency or commonness ; A. trigeminata
and A. subsericeata occur at Mansfield (Daws), A. dilutaria at Southwell and Wellow (Becher),
and A. emarginata in Sherwood Forest (Brameld). Timandra amataria is not uncommon.
CABERIDAE
Cabera pusaria and C. exanthemata are common, and C. rotundaria occurs in the Birklands
(J. R. Hardy). Bapta temerata is of frequent occurrence.
MACARIIDAE
Macaria notata has been taken near Worksop by Hardy, and M. liturata is frequent. Halia
vauaria is everywhere common.
FIDONIIDAE
Strenia clatbrata has occurred at Sherwood Forest (Sterland) and Langford Moor (A. R.
Leivers). Panagra petraria occurs in many places among bracken, especially in Sherwood Forest,
and is generally abundant where found. Numeria pulveraria has been taken recently at Mansfield
and Wellow, and plentifully at Thorney. Ematurga atomaria is common in heathy places, as at
Sherwood Forest, Fountain Dale, Langford Moor, etc. Bupalus piniaria is abundant in Scotch fir
plantations, in various parts of Sherwood Forest, at Mansfield, Newstead, Wigsley, and Langford
Moor. All three species of Aspilates (A. strigillaria, A. ochrearia, and A. gi/varia) occur about
Mansfield but are rare (Daws).
ZERENIDAE
Abraxas grossu/ariata is common in gardens everywhere, and A. sy/vata, although of rather
uncertain appearance, is widely distributed and in some years extremely abundant. Ltgdia adustata
is not very common, but Lomaspilis marginata is fairly plentiful.
HYBERNIIDAE
All the Hyberniidae (Hybernia rupicapraria, H. leucophearia, H. aurantiaria, H. marginaria,
H. defoliaria and Anisopteryx aescularia) are very common, excepting aurantiaria, which is however
by no means scarce ; and many beautiful varieties of leucophearia, marginaria, and defoliaria have been
taken in Sherwood Forest and elsewhere.
117
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
LARENTIIDAE
Cheimatobia brumata is abundant, and C. boreata common in several places. Oporabia dilutata
is pretty common, but 0. fillgrammaria and 0. autumnaria are scarce, and occur chiefly about
Mansfield. Larentia didymata is abundant, L. multistrigaria and L. virldaria fairly common.
Emmelesia affinitata, E. alchemlllata^ E. albulata, and E. decolorata are all of frequent occurrence.
Twenty-six species of ' Pugs ' are on record for the county, viz., Eupithecia venosata, rare but
widely distributed ; E. /inariata, scarce in the Mansfield district ; E. pulchellata and E. oblongata
frequent in several places ; E. succenturiata, Southwell and Sherwood Forest ; E. subfulvata at
Nottingham, Mansfield, and Worksop ; E. scabiosata and E. pygmaeata taken on several occasions
in different years at Mansfield (Daws) ; E. castigata fairly common at Mansfield and in Sherwood
Forest ; E.fraxinata and E. innotata rather scarce at Mansfield (Daws) ; E. indigata common in
Sherwood Forest (Miss Alderson) and also found at Mansfield ; E. nanata frequent at Edwinstowe
(Hardy) and Mansfield (Daws) ; E. subnotata at Chilwell (D. H. Pearson) and in Sherwood Forest ;
E. vulgata very common everywhere ; E. albipunctata, rare at Worksop and Mansfield ; E. absin-
tbiata in Sherwood Forest, where the larva feeds on ragwort flowers in company with E. oblongata}
E. minutata, a few some seasons at Mansfield (Daws) ; E. assimilata at Worksop and Clumber
(Miss Alderson) ; E. lariclata, fairly common in Clumber Park (Miss Alderson) ; E. abbreviata
common at Worksop and Mansfield ; E. dodoneata, a single female found on an oak tree in
Sherwood Forest in 1896 by J. R. Hardy; E. exiguata frequent at Clumber (Miss Alderson) and
Mansfield (Daws) ; E. pumi/ata, Mansfield (Daws) ; E. coronata, Clumber and Mansfield ; and
E. rectangu/ata, widely distributed and fairly common.
Thera simulata is recorded as taken at Berry Hill, near Mansfield, on 26 May, 1896, by Mr. W.
Daws ; T. variata is common in fir plantations in Sherwood Forest and elsewhere ; and T.firmata
has been taken in the Forest and near Mansfield. Hypsipetes trifasdata has occurred at Newstead
and Wollaton, and H. sordidata is generally distributed and common. Melanthta albicil/ata, M.
ocellata, and M. bicolorata are all of general occurrence. Melamppe kastata is recorded for Sherwood
Forest by Sterland only, and needs confirmation ; M. tristata is rather scarce about Mansfield
(Daws) ; M. rivata has been taken in some numbers in woods near Mansfield and Nottingham ;
M. iociata and M. montanata are widely distributed and common; M.galiata has occurred at New-
stead, and M, fluctuata is perhaps our commonest geometer, being especially abundant in gardens in
Nottingham. Antldea badiata and A. nigrofasciaria are frequent, especially the former ; but A, rubi-
data is represented only by three specimens taken at Edwinstowe on 4 June, 1896, by Mr. Hardy.
Coremia designata occurs sparingly in Wellow Park and in Sherwood Forest, and I have taken it in
Epperstone and Beauvale Woods. C. fcrrugata and C. unidentaria are rather common, but
C. quadrifasciaria has only been taken in Sherwood Forest by Mr. R. E. Brameld. Camptogramma
bilineata is common everywhere. Phibalaptcryx vittata is recorded for Sherwood Forest by both
Sterland and Brameld, and Mr. Daws has taken P. vitalbata in gardens at Mansfield. Triphosa
dubitata occurs throughout the county, sometimes commonly. Eucosmia certata has been taken
several times by the Rev. A. Thornley in his garden at South Leverton ; and E. undulata has
occurred in Sherwood Forest and at Mansfield, but only very rarely. Scotosia vetulata has only once
been taken, by the Rev. W. Becher, at Southwell ; but S. rbamnata has been taken sparingly in
several localities.
Cidaria siderata is ' occasional in Sherwood Forest ' (Sterland), while C. miata, C. corylata,
C. truncata, C. immanata, C. suffiimata, C. silaceata, C. prunata, C. testata, C. populata, C. fu/vata,
C. dotata, C. associata, and Pelurga comitata all occur in various localities, most of them commonly.
EUBOLIIDAE
Eubolia cervinata, E. /imitata, and E. plumbaria are all of frequent occurrence, and E. bipunc-
tarla has been taken in several localities. Anaitis plagiata is found in several places, but is not
common. Chesias spartiata is rather rare, and C. rufata has occurred only in Sherwood Forest
(Brameld).
SIONIDAE
Tanagra atrata is widely distributed, and in some localities common.
PYRALIDES
PYRALIDIDAE
Aglossa pinguinalis and Pyra Us farina /is are common in stables and outbuildings throughout the
county. P. coitalis occurs at Worksop, and P. glaucinalis is rather scarce in Sherwood Forest and
the Mansfield and Retford districts ; it is generally taken at sugar. Scoparia ambigualis is everywhere
118
INSECTS
common, and S. cembrae, S. murana, S. dubitalis, S. mercure//ay S. crataegella, S. resinea, S. trundco/e//a,
and S. angustea all occur with more or less frequency ; S. lineola has, however, only been taken in
Sherwood Forest by Mr. R. E. Brameld. Nomophila noctuella occurs in the Worksop district.
Pyraustra purpuralis, P. ostrina/is, and Herbula cespitalis are frequent.
BOTYDAE
Eurrhypara urticata is common everywhere among nettles. Scapula lutealis and S. olivalis are wide-
spread and common, and S. prunalis of frequent occurrence. Botys ruralis is another common species ;
but of B. asinalis only a single specimen has been taken by Mr. Daws at Mansfield. Ebulea crocealis
occurs in the Worksop district, and E. sambucalis is common. Spilodes sticticalis is represented by a
single specimen captured at Mansfield by Mr. Daws. Pionea forficalis is common nearly everywhere.
HYDROCAMPIDAE
Cataclysta lemnata occurs in plenty in suitable localities. Paraponyx stratiotata is found about
Worksop. Hydrocampa nymphaeata and H. stagnata occur in the Mansfield and Worksop districts.
ACENTROPODIDAE
Acentropus niveus has been taken near Worksop and Mansfield.
PTEROPHORI
The Plume moths are only moderately well represented in Nottinghamshire. Platypttlia
gonodactyla, Mimaeseoptllus bipunctidactylus, and M. pterodactylus occur in Sherwood Forest and the
Mansfield district ; M. zophodactylm and Oedematophorm lithodactylus at Worksop ; Pterophorus mono-
dactylus, Leioptilus osteodactylus, and Aciptilia tetradactyla in Sherwood Forest ; A. galactodactyla in
Wellow Park, where the Rev. W. Becher finds the larvae on burdock ; A. pentadactyla is every-
where common ; and Alucita hexadactyla is plentiful in some localities.
CRAMBI
CHILIDAE
Schoenoblus forficellm occurs in the Worksop district.
CRAMBIDAE
Cra mbus pratellus, C. triste//us, C. culmellus, and C. hortuellus are widely distributed and common ;
C. pine/lus, C. per/e//us, and C. inquinatellm occur at Mansfield, Worksop, and in Sherwood Forest ;
C. fahellus has been taken at South Leverton by Rev. A. Thornley ; C. pascuellus in Sherwood
Forest by Mr. R. E. Brameld ; C. selasellus at Worksop by Mr. Houghton ; and C. sylvellus,
C. uliginosellus, C. warringtonellus, C. contamincllus, C. gtniculeta, C. chrysonuchellus, and C. craterellus
are all reported from the Mansfield district by Mr. W. Daws.
PHYCIDAE
Myelophila cribrum is reported by Mr. Daws as bred from pupae found in thistles in the Mans-
field district. Homoeosoma nimbella and H. nebulella were both taken at Worksop in 1901 by
Mr. J. T. Houghton. Ephestia elutella occurs at Worksop, where it has been taken by Miss Alderson
and Mr. Houghton ; E. ficella and E. kubniella are reported by Daws from Mansfield, the former
bred from dried fruits, the latter probably introduced in flour. Euzophera pinguis is recorded by
Brameld for Sherwood Forest. Cryptoblabes bhtriga has been taken in Clumber Park by Miss
Alderson. Phycis fusca occurs at Worksop (Houghton), and P. betulae was taken for the first time in
1902 at Edwinstowe by Miss Alderson.
Nephopteryx spissicel/a, Rhodophaea cansocieHa, R. advenellay and R. tumidella all occur, but rarely,
in Sherwood Forest.
GALLERIDAE
Aphomia sociella is not uncommon in the vicarage garden at S. Leverton (Thornley), and
Achroea grisella is found at Worksop (Houghton).
TORTRICES
TORTRICIDAE
Tortrix podana, T. rosana, T. beparana, T. unifasciana, T. minlstrana, and T. forsterana are all
more or less common. 7". viridana is an abundant and destructive pest in oak woods, sometimes
119
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
almost stripping the trees of their foliage. T. crataegana, T. xy/osteana, T. sorbiana, T. cinnamomeana,
T, ribeana, T. corylana, T. costana, and T. pa/leana, all occur in the northern half of the county
from Mansfield to Worksop ; and T. dumetana and T. viburnana are reported from Mansfield
(Daws). Dichelia grotiana was taken in 1903 at Clumber by Miss Alderson. Peronea schalleriana,
P. comparana, and P. logiana occur in Sherwood Forest and the Worksop district ; P. variegana is
rather common in the Forest, and at Mansfield and South Leverton ; P. ferrugana common in
Sherwood Forest ; P. sponsana recorded as rare in the same locality by Brameld ; P. cristana and
P. hastiana are said by Daws to be frequent in the Mansfield district. Rhacodia caudana is stated by
Brameld to be frequent in Sherwood Forest. Teras contaminana has been taken in various places ;
the larvae occurred in great numbers on apple trees at Southwell in 1884, and were largely picked
off and eaten by sparrows (Captain Becher, in Zoologist, Sept. 1884, p. 342). Dictyopteryx loeflingiana,
D. bolmiana, D. bergmanniana, D. forskaleana, Argyrotoxa comuayana, and Ptycholoma lecheana are all
more or less common in the county.
PENTHINIDAE
Penthina cortlcana has been taken at Worksop and in Clumber Park by Miss Alderson ; P. betu-
laetana and P. sororculana occur in the Worksop district ; P. pruniana and P. variegana are common ;
and P. ochroleucana has occurred at South Leverton and in Sherwood Forest.
SPILONOTIDAE
Hedya ocellana is very common ; H. aceriana has only been taken in my garden in Nottingham ;
H. dealbana occurs at Worksop and in Clumber Park. Spilonota trimaculana used to be taken in
Sherwood Forest, but has not occurred lately ; 5. roborana is not uncommon. Pardia tripunctana
is common.
SERICORIDAE
Aspis udmannlana and Sericoris lacunana are both common ; 5. urticaria is frequent at Mansfield
(Daws) and in Sherwood Forest (Brameld), and S. bifasciana was taken in 1902 in Clumber Park
by Miss Alderson. Euchromia purpurana and Orthotaenia striana both occur in the Worksop district
(Houghton), and 0. ericetana was taken for the first time in 1904 at Shireoaks by Miss Alderson.
SCIAPHILIDAE
Phtheochroa rugosana is recorded for Sherwood Forest by Brameld. Cnephasia musculana is widely
distributed and rather common. Sciaphila conspersana occurs in the Worksop district (Houghton) ;
5. subjectana is common, and S. virgaureana, S. hybridana, and S. octomaculana also occur, but less
frequently. Sphaleroptera ictericana is widely distributed, but apparently uncommon. Capua favill-
aceana is common in Clumber Park (Miss Alderson).
GRAPHOLITHIDAE
Bactra lameolana, Phoxopteryx lundana, and P. mitterpacheriana are not uncommon, and P. lactana
has been taken by Miss Alderson in Clumber Park. Grapholitha ramella occurred at Worksop in
1901 (Houghton), G. nigromaculana in 1904, near Worksop (Miss Alderson), and G. trimaculana is
reported for the same district by Miss Alderson, and I have taken it recently at Chilwell.
G. subocellana, G. penkleriana, and G. naevana occur in various localities. Hypermecia cruciana
is locally common about Worksop (Houghton). Batodes angustiorana occurs throughout the county.
Paedisca bi/unana, P. profundana, and P. solandriana have hitherto been taken only in Sherwood
Forest, where also P. cortlcana is excessively common and variable, as well as at South Leverton ;
P. occultana was taken at Shireoaks in 1901 (Houghton). Seven species of Ephippiphora occur in
the north of the county, viz., E. simi/ana, E. cirsiana, E. pflugiana, E. brunnichiana, E. nigricostaaa,
E. trigeminana and E. papu/ana, the two latter taken at Worksop by Miss Alderson in 1 904 and
1 905 respectively. Olindia ulmana and Semasia ianthinana were taken by Mr. Houghton at
Worksop in 1901 ; 5. spiniana is recorded for Sherwood Forest, and 5. woeberiana is common in the
Nottingham district. Coccyx splendidulana occurs in the Worksop and Retford districts ; C. argyrana
is well distributed ; C. taedella is reported from Sherwood Forest ; and C. nanana is found in the
Nottingham and Worksop districts. Retinia pinivorana is reported by Brameld from Sherwood
Forest, and on 21 May, 1905, Miss Alderson bred a specimen from a larva found in Clumber Park.
Carpocapsa pomonella is frequent. Endopisa nigricana is only recorded in the imago stage for South
Leverton. Stigmonota coniferana, S. perlepidana, S. nitidana, and S. regiana, Dicrorampha petiverella,
D. plumbana, D. plumbagana, and D. acuminatana, Pyrodes rheediella, Catoptria hypericana, C. scopo/ianat
and C. expallidana all occur in the county, but are mostly scarce or local. Catoptria cana is rather
common, and C. ulicetana abundant.
120
INSECTS
PYRALOIDIDAE
Choreutts myllerana and Symaetbis pariana are rare, but S. oxyacanthella is abundant everywhere.
CONCHYLIDAE
Eupoecilia nana, E. dubitana, and E. atricapitana all occur at Worksop (Miss Alderson), and
E. angustana is reported from Mansfield (Daws). Xanthmetia zoegana has been taken at Mansfield
and in Sherwood Forest, and X. hamana is widely distributed and common in places. Lobesia
re/iguana, Argyrolepta hartmanniana, A, Indiana^ A. cnicana, Conchy/is francittana, and C. straminea
have all been taken in Sherwood Forest by Brameld, and all but the second of these by Miss Alderson
in Clumber Park and at Shireoaks.
APHELIIDAE
Tortrlcodei hyemana occurs abundantly in the Worksop and Mansfield districts.
TINE.E
EPIGRAPHIIDAE
Lemnatophila phryganella is recorded for Sherwood Forest by Brameld. Dasystoma salicella
occurs commonly in several localities. Exapate congelatella has been taken atS. Leverton (Thornley).
Diurnea fagella is very common everywhere, and excessively variable in colour, every gradation
occurring from pale buff to nearly black. Semioicopus avellanella is common in Sherwood Forest.
Eplgrapbia steinkellneriana is rare at Mansfield (Daws).
PSYCHIDAE
Talaeporia pseudo-bombycella, Fumea intermediella, and Solenobia inconspicuella have been taken in
Clumber Park by Miss Alderson, and 5. triquetrella is reported from the Mansfield district (Daws).
TINEIDAE
Xyunatodoma melanella was taken in Clumber Park in the summer of 1 902 by Miss Alderson,
and Ochsenbeimeria blrdella in the Worksop district by Mr. Houghton. Of the genus Scardia we
have 5. boleti (Mansfield, Daws), 5. corticella, 5. granella, S. cloacella, S. rurico/e//a, and S. arcella, all of
which have been taken in Sherwood Forest, and most of them in other localities as well.
Blabophanesfenestratella is reported by Daws to be frequent in the Mansfield district, and B. rusticella
is widely distributed. The genus Tinea is rather poorly represented with us. T. fulvimitrella was
taken many years ago by Brameld in Clumber Park, and several specimens have been taken recently
in the same place by Miss Alderson ; T. tapetzclla is very common, and sometimes destructive in
houses ; T. pellionella has occurred at South Leverton in the vicarage (Thornley) ; T. fusdpunctella
is reported from Sherwood Forest and Chilwell ; T. pallacentella and T. lapella from Worksop and
Sherwood Forest, the latter occurring also not uncommonly at S. Leverton ; and T. semifuhiella is
not rare in Clumber Park (Miss Alderson). Tinea/a bhelllella is frequent in the Mansfield and
Worksop districts. Lampronia luzella occurs at Treswell and Osberton (Miss Alderson), and L.
rubiella at Mansfield and S. Leverton. Incurvaria muicalella is widely distributed and common ;
/. pectinea has been taken commonly by Miss Alderson in Sherwood Forest ; and /. capitella has
been bred freely from currant shoots at Kingston-on-Soar, by Mr. F. Wakerley. Micropteryx
calthella swarms in some localities on buttercup and marsh-marigold flowers ; M. thunbergella
was found by the Rev. A. Thornley flying in numbers about the grassy drives of Treswell
Wood on 1 6 May, 1901 ; M. sefella, M. semipurpure/!a, M. unimaculella and M. subpurpurella
have all been taken in Clumber Park by Miss Alderson, and the last-named species also occurs in
Treswell Wood (Thornley) ; M. sangii was taken in the spring of 1903 in the Woiksop district,
also by Miss Alderson. Nemophora swammerdammella is common, and N. scbwarziella frequent in
one or two localities.
ADELIDAE
Adela fibulella has occurred recently (1903) at Treswell Wood (Miss Alderson) ; A. rufimitrella
seems to be widely distributed but not common ; A. degeerella is reported from Sherwood Forest,
and is common at Thieves Wood, near Mansfield (Daws), and I have lately taken it at Strelley ;
A. viridella occurs plentifully in most parts of the county.
HYPONOMEUTIDAE
Svjammerdammia pyrella is of general occurrence, but S. combinella and S. caesiella are apparently
local and rare. Hyponomeuta padellus is wide-spread and common ; H. evonymellus occurs in the
I 121 l6
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Worlcsop and Mansfield districts ; and H. plumbellus is reported from Worksop and Sherwood Forest.
I netted a single specimen of Anesychia funerella in Epperstone Park on 19 May, 1901 — a fact
worthy of note owing to the entire absence of the usual food-plant, Symphytum officinale, from the
district.
Prays curtisellus is found in the Worksop and Retford districts.
PLUTELLIDAE
Plutella cruciferarum is sometimes only too common, and P. porrectella occurs at Mansfield,
Worksop, and South Leverton. Cerostoma sequella is reported as rare in Sherwood Forest ; C.
vittella occurs at Worksop ; and both C. radiate/la and C. costella have been taken commonly in
Sherwood Forest and Thieves Wood near Mansfield.
We possess all the three species of Harpipteryx, H. scabrella and H. nemorella having been
taken in the Worksop district by Mr. Houghton, while H. xylaste/la occurs commonly in several
localities on honeysuckle.
GELECHIIDAE
Orthotelia sparganella is recorded by Brameld for Sherwood Forest. Phtbaloctra quercana is
common in the Forest, and at S. Leverton. We have sixteen species of Defressaria, two of which,
D. costosa and D. propinquella, are recorded only by Brameld for Sherwood Forest ; four, viz.,
D.umbellana, D. subpropinquella, D. ct/ie/la, and D. depressella, are reported from Mansfield by Daws;
D, aisimilella and D. liturella have been taken at Clumber and Worksop by Miss Alderson, both
in 1903 ; D. angelkella at Worksop (Houghton) and Treswell (Thornley) ; and the remainder,
viz., D, flavella, D. armella, D. ahtroemeriana, D. yeatiana, D. applana, D. weirella, and D. heracleana
occur in various localities. Gelechia nigra is said by Daws to be frequent in the Mansfield district,
G. er'uetella occurs at Clumber and elsewhere in Sherwood Forest, G. diffinis is found at Bulwell
Forest and Worksop, G. rhombella has so far only occurred in my garden at Nottingham, G. distinctella
near Worksop in 1904 (Miss Alderson), and G. scalella has been taken in Clumber Park and Treswell
Wood. Brachmia mouffetella is rare in Sherwood Forest (Brameld). Bryotropha terrella is widely
distributed, B. desertella used to be common in Sherwood Forest (Brameld), and B. domestica occurs
at Mansfield (Daws). Teleia luculella is not uncommon at S. Leverton and in Treswell Wood
(Thornley), and has been taken, together with T. proximella, in Clumber Park by Miss Alderson.
T. bumeralis is said by Brameld to be rare in Sherwood Forest, and the same statement applies to
Recurvaria leucate//a, Poecilia nivea, and Nannodia stipel/a, var. naeviferella. Recurvaria nanella occurs
at Osberton. Lamprotes atrella and Anacampsis ligulella have been taken at Worksop by Mr. Houghton,
and A. immaculatdla is said by Daws to be common in the Mansfield district. Tachyptilia populella
occurs about Worksop and in Treswell Wood. Ceratophora rufescens is another of Brameld's Sherwood
Forest captures. Parana metzneriella, Che/aria htibnerella and Atlanta spartiella have all occurred in
the Worksop district (Houghton). Sophrtmia parenthesella is rare in Sherwood Forest (Brameld).
Harpella geoffrella occurs among honeysuckle at Mansfield (Daws), and a single specimen of H. brac-
teella was taken at Worksop in 1901 by Mr. J. T. Houghton. Dasycera sulphurella is widely
distributed and common. Oecophora fulvlguttella and Oe. lambdella occur in the north of the county,
and Oe. pseudospretella and Endrosis fenestrella are only too common.
GLYPHIPTERYGIDAE
Glyphipteryx fuscoviridella and G. facheriella are not uncommon, and G. forsterella occurs in the
Mansfield district (Daws). Heliozele sericiella was taken by Miss Alderson in Clumber Park on
19 May, 1902.
ARGYRESTHIIDAE
The genus Argyresthia is well represented in Nottinghamshire, the following species having been
taken quite recently in the localities specified : A.ephippellaznA A. pygmaeella (Worksop, Houghton) ;
A. nitidella, A. spinie//a, and A. albistria (S. Leverton, Thornley) ; A. conjugella^ A. semifusca, and
A, brocbella (Worksop district, Miss Alderson) ; A. glaucinella (Treswell Wood, Thornley) ;
A. curvella (Worksop and Nottingham) ; and A. goedartella (common and widely distributed) ; the
variety llterella of the last species occurs in my garden in Nottingham. In addition to the above
Brameld records A. semitestacella and A. mendica for Sherwood Forest, and Mr. W. Daws reports
A. dilectella, A. arceuthina, A, praecocella and A. aurulentella from the Mansfield district. Cedestis
farinatella occurs at Clumber and Mansfield, and Ocnerostoma piniariella at Mansfield (Daws).
GRACILARIIDAE
Gracilaria alchimiella and G. syringe/la are common, G. elongella and G. tr'mgipennella occur
near Worksop, and G. auroguttella in the Retford district. Ornix avellanella, 0. angltcella^ 0. betu/ae,
122
INSECTS
and 0. torqulllella are all recorded for Sherwood Forest by Brameld, and the two first-named have
been taken commonly elsewhere in the county.
COLEOPHORIDAE
The large genus Coleopbora is not very well represented with us, only the following species
having been so far identified, but doubtless many other species will ultimately be discovered in the
county : — C. fabrlciella, C. alcyonipennella, C. albtcosta, C. palliatella, C. dhcorddla, C. saturatella,
C. caespititiella, C. virgaureae, C. laricella, C. albitarsella, C. nigricella, C. fuscedinella, C. gryphipen-
nellay C. o/ivacee/Ia, C. lutipennella, C. adjunctella, and C. limosipennella.
ELACHISTIDAE
Batrachedra pinicolella was taken in the Worksop district on 19 July, 1902, by Miss Alderson,
and Chauliodus chaerophyllellus at Fenton, near Sturton, in 1901 by the Rev. A. Thornley. Laverna
raschkiella occurs at Osberton, and L. epilobiella is common at Welbeck (Miss Alderson); L. ochraceella
has been taken at Chilwell (D. H. Pearson), L. hellerella at Nottingham and near Worksop, and
L. atra at Nottingham. Chrysoclysta schrankella is reported from Mansfield (Daws), and C. aurl-
frtmtella is sometimes very common about North and South Leverton (Thornley), and also occurs
at Worksop. The genus Elachista is represented by E. apidpunctella (Nottingham and Clumber),
E. nigrella (S. Leverton, Thornley), E. triatomea (Worksop, Houghton), E. rufocinerea (very common
everywhere), E. subalbidella (N. Leverton, Thornley), and E. argentella (common) ; E. albifrontella
and E. ceruaella are, in addition, recorded by Brameld for Sherwood Forest, but have not yet
been noted by more recent observers. Tischeria complanella has been taken in Clumber Park by
Miss Alderson.
LITHOCOLLETIDAE
Lithocolletis is another genus rather poorly represented in Nottinghamshire. L. roboris
L. cavella, L. ulmifoliella, and L. heegeriella have all been taken recently in Clumber Park by Miss
Alderson ; L. pomifoliella occurs in the Nottingham district, and L. salidcolella at Clarborough
(Thornley) ; L. quercifoliella and L. cramerella are common, as also is L. messaniella on Quercus ilex at
Worksop (Miss Alderson) ; L. tcnella and L. mcellli have been taken in Treswell Wood (Thornley),
and Brameld gives L. faginella and L,. alnlfoliella in his Sherwood Forest list.
LYONETIIDAE
Lyonetia clerckella, said by Brameld to be rare in Sherwood Forest, is common at Worksop,
according to Miss Alderson. Cemiostoma laburnella is abundant on laburnum trees in Nottingham
gardens, and also occurs at Mansfield and S. Leverton. Only a single species of Bucculatrix, viz.,
B. nigricomella, which occurs in the Worksop and Retford districts, has so far been detected in
Nottinghamshire.
NEPTICULIDAE
The Nepticulidae have been almost entirely neglected : indeed, only four species of Nepticula
are on record. N. anomalella and N. mb-blmaculella occur in the vicarage garden at South
Leverton, and the latter species occurs also not uncommonly on oak trunks in Treswell Wood
(Thornley) and in Clumber Park (Miss Alderson). N. argcntipedella is taken in the Worksop
district by Miss Alderson, and N. fragarulla has been captured in the same district by Mr. J. T.
Houghton. Trifurcula immundella has recently been taken in Clumber Park by Miss Alderson.
But for the difficulty in pinning and setting these minute moths we should doubtless have had many
more species to record.
DIPTERA
Flies
The insects belonging to this order are easily known by their possessing only one pair of
membranous and nearly transparent wings ; behind these, in the place of the hind wings, are a
pair of stalked knobs — the halteres or ' balancers.' The fleas and a few parasitic flies are, however,
wingless. The head is remarkable for its great mobility, being connected with the thorax by a
neck which is so slender and flexible as to permit of nearly complete rotation. The eyes are very
large, often occupying the greater part of the visible surface of the head. The mouth is suctorial.
The larvae are usually legless grubs or maggots, feeding on all kinds of animal and vegetable refuse, or
inside living plant tissues, where they sometimes give rise to galls, or they are predaceous or parasitic ;
123
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
some are aquatic. The mature insects are equally diverse in their habits. Many live by sucking
the blood of vertebrate animals, others prey upon other insects, and an enormous number live on
decaying animal or vegetable matter, or suck nectar from flowers.
The Diptera have been comparatively neglected in Nottinghamshire, and most of our knowledge
of the group we owe to the exertions of the Rev. A. Thornley, who, together with the present
writer, is responsible for all the records in the following list unless otherwise stated. Much
unidentified material exists in the writer's collection which could not be worked out in time for
use in this article.
The arrangement and nomenclature adopted are those of Verrall's List of British Diptera,
2nd edition.
ORTHORRHAPHA
NEMATOCERA
PULICIDAB
Pulex irritans, Linn. Abundant everywhere
Trichopsylla gallinae, Schrk. S. Leverton, abundant
in old fowl-house
CECIDOMYIDAE
Cecidomyia bursaria, Bremi. Linby, bred from galls
on Nepeta glechoma (G. B. Rothera)
- clausilia, Meade. Bred from galls on willow
leaves (G. B. Rothera)
- crataegi, Winn. Wilford, Ruddington (G. B.
Rothera) ; S. Leverton, abundant
- galii, Lw. Wilford, bred from galls on Galium
verum (G. B. Rothera)
- marginemtorquens, Bremi. Common on willows
near Leverton Station
- plicatrix, Lw. Oxton, galls on Rubus (G. B.
Rothera)
- rosaria, Lw. Forms the well-known and con-
spicuous leaf rosettes on the ends of willow
twigs ; common
- rosarum, Hardy. Nottingham district, bred from
galls on leaves of Rosa canina (G. B. Rothera)
- salicis, Schrk. Oxton (G. B. Rothera), forms
tumours on twigs of Salix caprea and other
willows
— taxi, Inch. Galls on yew hedge at S. Leverton
— tiliae, Schrk. Nottingham, Arnold, bred from galls
on lime (G. B. Rothera) ; Bcauvale Woods
- tilicola, Rud. Manton Woods
- ulmariae, Bremi. Linby, bred from galls on
Spiraea ulmaria (G. B. Rothera) ; S. Leverton
and other parishes around, not uncommon
- urticae, Ferris. Galls on stinging nettle (Urtica
dioica), Nottingham (Rothera) ; 5. Leverton and
other parishes nr. Retford, common
- veronicae, Vallot. S. Leverton; all the Veronica
Chamoedrys in this parish seem to be affected
with this gall. Common throughout the Ret-
ford district
Hormomyia capreae, Winn. Bred from galls on
leaves of Salix caprea, Linby (G. B. Rothera)
MYCETOPHILIDAE
Mycetophila punctata, Mg. \
— cingulum, Mg. j
Glaphyroptera fascipennis, Mg. S. Leverton, rare
BIBIONIDAE
Scatopse notata, Linn. S. Leverton
Dilophus febrilis, Linn. Nottingham ; early in 1899
this insect completely destroyed a large crop of
spring lettuces in a market garden ; S. Leverton,
abundant
ORTHORRHAPHA (continued)
NEMATOCERA (continued)
BIBIONIDAE (continued)
Bibio marci, Linn. Universally distributed and
abundant
— varipes, Mg. S. Leverton
— johannis, Linn. Abundant and widely distributed
SIMULIDAE
Simulium reptans, Linn. S. Leverton ; Trestvell Wood,
abundant
CULICIDAE
Anopheles maculipennis, Mg. S. Leverton
Culex annulatus, Schrk. Common ; in 1905 this
species was excessively common in Nottingham,
and many persons were badly bitten by it
— nemorosus, Mg. S. Leverton
— pipiens, Linn. Common everywhere
PTYCHOPTERIDAK
Ptychoptera contaminata, Linn. Worksop (J. T.
Houghton) ; S. Leverton
— paludosa, Mg. S. Leverton
— • albimana, Fab. S. Leverton
LIMNOBIDAE
Limnobia quadrinotata, Mg. Trestuell Wood
— nubeculosa, Mg. S. Leverton
— analis, Mg. Sheru'ood Forest (R. C. Bradley)
— tripunctata, Fab. S. Leverton
Dicranomyia chorea, Mg. S. Leverton, common
Rhypholophus lineatus, Mg.U Leverton
— nodulosus, Mcq. j
Poecilostola punctata, Schrk. S. Leverton
Trichocera hiemalis, Deg. Common and widely dis-
tributed
TIPULIDAE
Pachyrrhina crocata, Linn. Worksop (Miss Alderson) ;
Sherwood Forest, common (R. C. Bradley and
C. J. Wainwright)
— histrio, Fab. S. Leverton ; Fkdborough
- maculosa, Mg. N. and S. Leverton: Grove;
Nottingham
— quadrifaria, Mg. S. Leverton
Tipula pabulina, Mg. (?) ' This small species occurs
commonly in the autumn on the windows and
walls of the vicarage at S. Leverton, and has to
all appearance a subapterous female. Dr. Meade
names it doubtfully pabulina ' (A. Thornley)
— lunata, Linn. S. Leverton
— vernalis, Mg. N. and S. Leverton ; Trcstoell Wood
— vittata, Mg. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
— gigantea, Schrk. Widely distributed and common
— ochracea, Mg. S. Leverton; Tresviell Wood;
Clumber (Miss Alderson)
124
INSECTS
ORTHORRHAPHA (continued)
NEMATOCERA (continued)
TIPULIDAE (continued}
Dictenidia bimaculata, Linn. Sherwood -Forest (C. J.
Wainwright) ; S. Leverton
Xiphura nigricornis, Mg. Sherwood Forest (R. C.
Bradley)
RHYPHIDAB
Rhyphus fenestralis, Scop. Nottingham ; S. Leverton
— punctatus, Fab. S. Leverton, common
BRACHTCERA
STRATIOMYIDAE
Nemotelus nigrinus, Fin. Saundby (Eland Shaw)
Oxycera pygmaea, Fin. Misterton
Chrysonotus bipunctatus, Scop. Worksop (Houghton)
Sargus cuprarius, Linn. Worksop (Houghton) ; Not-
tingham ; Treswell. Var. nubeculosus, Ztt.,
common at S. Leverton and in Treswell Wood
Chloromyia fbrmosa, Scop. Worksop (Houghton) ;
Retford district, common.
Microchrysa polita. Linn.) 0 T
- flavicLis, Mg. J5' Levertm
Beris vallata, Forst. S. Leverton
— fuscipes, Mg. Treswell Wood
TABANIDAE
Haematopota pluvialis, Linn. Worksop (Houghton) ;
S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood, etc. common
Therioplectes solstitialis, Mg. 1 Clumber (Miss Alder-
Tabanus bovinus, Linn. / son)
Tabanus bromius, Linn. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
Chrysops caecutiens, Linn. Longford 'Moor, Newark ;
Retford district, common
LEPTIDAE
Leptis scolopacea, Linn. S. Leverton, common on the
boles of willow trees
— tringaria, Linn. Worksop (Houghton) ; S. Lever-
ton ; Treswell Wood
Chrysopilus aureus, Mg. Sutton near Retford ; Tres-
well Wood, common
Xylophagus ater, Fab. Sherwood Forest (R. C. Bradley)
ASILIDAE
Leptogaster cylindrica, Deg. Generally distributed
Dioctria oelandica, Linn. Sherwood Forest (C. J.
Wainwright)
— atricapilla, Mg. Rampton Marsh
- rufipes, Deg. Generally distributed and common
— baumhaueri, Mg. Sherwood Forest (C. J. Wain-
wright)
— linearis, Fab. Treswell Wood
Laphria marginata, Linn. Treswell Wood
Asilus crabronifofmis, Linn. Bulwell Forest, Notting-
ham, several specimens taken some years ago
Neoitamus cyanurus, Lw. Sherwood Forest (Wain-
wright) ; Langford Moor, Newark; Clumber
(Miss Alderson)
Machimus atricapillus, Fin. Thorney ; Treswell Wood ;
Clumber (Miss Alderson)
Dysmachus trigonus, Mg. Bulwell Forest; Worksop
(Houghton)
ORTHORRHAPHA (continued')
BRACHTCERA (continued)
BOMBYLIDAE
Bombylius major, Linn. Roe Wood, Winkburn, rather
common at primrose flowers ; Treswell Wood,
and in vicarage garden at S. Leverton, at prim-
roses ; Eakr'mg Brail Wood
THEREVIDAB
Thereva nobilitata, Fab. Sherwood Forest (C. J. Wain-
wright)
EMPIDAE
Cyrtoma spuria, Fin. Treswell Wood
Rhamphomyia sulcata, Fin. Nottingham; Retford
district
— flava, Fin. S. Leverton
Empis tessellata, Fab. Common throughout the
county
- livida, Linn. S. Leverton; Treswell; Grove;
Langford Moor. In Treswell Wood numerous
examples were seen capturing specimens of a
species of Tortrix
— opaca, Fab. Clifton ; S. Leverton
- stercorea, Linn. N. Leverton ; Treswell Wood,
common
• — trigramma, Mg. N. and S. Leverton ; Treswell
Wood ; Gedling, common
— pennipes, Linn. Treswell Wood, common
— vernalis, Mg. Treswell Wood
- chioptera, Fin. N. and S. Leverton
Pachymeria femorata, Fab. S. Leverton
Hilara pilosa, Ztt. Treswell Wood
- maura, Fab. S. Leverton
Ocydromia glabricula, Fin. S. Leverton
DOLICHOPODIDAE
Dolichopus griseipennis, Stan. Treswell Wood
— trivialis, Hal. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
— aeneus, Deg. Worksop and Retford districts, abun-
dant
Chrysotus gramineus, Fin. Treswell Wood
Argyra diaphana, Fab. S. Leverton
— argyria, Mg. Treswell Wood
Scellus notatus, Fab. S. Leverton
LoNCHOPTERI DAI
Lonchoptera lacustris, Mg. S. Leverton
CYCLORRHAPHA
PROBOSCIDEA
PLATYPEZIDAE
Pipunculus campestris, Ltr. S. Leverton; Treswell
Wood
SYRPHIDAE
Pipizella heringi, Ztt. Treswell Wood, 9 June, 1900
Pipiza luteitarsis, Ztt. S. Leverton
— noctiluca, Linn. S. Leverton, not uncommon
— lugubris, Fab. Treswell Wood
Cnemodon vitripennis, Mg. Worksop (Houghton) ;
S. Leverton
Liogaster metallina, Fab. S. Leverton; Treswell
Wood
125
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
CYCLORRHAPHA (continued)
PROBOSCIDEJ (continued)
SYRPHIDAE (continued)
Chrysogaster splendens, Mg. S. Lcverton ; Trestvell
Wood
— hirtella, Lw. Retford ; S. Leverton
- chalybeata, Mg. S. Leverton
Chilosia sparsa, Lw. Treswell Wood, rather common
— antiqua, Mg. Treswell Wood
— longula, Ztt. Kingston-on-Soar
— scutellata, Fin. Sherwood forest (C. J. Wain-
wright)
— pulchripes, Lw. S. Leverton ; Trestvell Wood ;
Widmerpool
— variabilis, Pz. Trt 'swell 'Wood, rather common ; S.
Leverton
— illustrata, Harr. Ramfton
- grossa, Fin. Retford (Pcgler) ; 5. Leverton ;
Winkburn
— albitarsis, Mg. ^//SWdistrict, common ; Gedllng
- fraterna, Mg. Treswell Wood
- praecox, Zett. Treswell Wood
- vernalis, Fin. S. Leverton
Platychirus manicatus, MgA
— pcltatus, Mg. (Common and widely dis-
— scutatus, Mg. j tributed
- albimanus, Mg. )
- scambus, Staeg. S. Leverton
- clypeatus, Mg. S. Leverton, Sept. 1897, in pro-
lusion ; SaunJby (Eland Shaw) ; Worksop
(Houghton)
- angustatus, Ztt. S. Leverton ; Trestvell
Pyrophaena granditarsa, Forst. S. Leverton
Melanostoma ambiguum, Fin. S. Leverton
- dubium, Ztt. Worksop (Miss Alderson)
- mellinum, Linn. Common
- scalare, Fab. N. Leverton ; Trestvell Wood
Melangyna quadrimaculata, Vcrr. Clumber (Miss
Alderson)
Leucozona lucorum, Linn. N. and S. Leverton ; Tres-
well Wood ; Worksop (Houghton)
Ischyrosyrphus laternarius, Mull. Trestvell Wood;
Aspley Woods, Nottingham ; Nether Langwith
Catabomba pyrastri, Linn. Nottingham and Retford
districts ; Thorney
Syrphus albostriatus, Fin. Retford district and Sher-
wood Forest, not uncommon
• — - tricinctus, Fin. Trestvell Wood ; Sherwood Forest,
near Edwin statue
- venustus, Mg. Sherwood Forest (Wainwright) ; S.
Leverton and Treswell Wood, common
- lunulatus, Mg. S. Lcverton
- nigricornis, Verr. Sherwood Forest (C. J. Wain-
wright)
— torvus, O.-S. Treswell Wood
— annulatus, Ztt. Sherwood Forest (C. J. Wain-
wright)
- lineola, Ztt. Sherwood Forest (C. J. Wainwright)
— ribesii, Linn. Common everywhere
— vitripennis, Mg. S. Leverton, not uncommon ;
Treswell Wood
— latifasciatus, Mcq. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
— nitidicollis, Mg. S. Leverton
— corollae, Fab.) „,. , . ,. ., , .
i • \/r ( Widely distributed and common
— luniger, Mg. J
- bifasciatus, Fab. Worksop (Houghton) ; S. Leverton,
common ; Treswell Wood
CYCLORRHAPHA (continued)
PROBOSCIDE4 (continued)
SVRPHIDAE (continued)
Syrphus balteatus, Deg. Widely distributed and
common
— cinctellus, Ztt. Woods at Kingston-on-Soar, not
uncommon on flowers of wild parsnip
- auricollis, Mg., var. maculicornis, Ztt. Sherwood
Forest (C. J. Wainwright) ; 5. Leverton, common
in the vicarage garden.
— umbellatarum, Fab. Worksop (Houghton) ; S.
Leverton
— lasiophthalmus, Ztt. S. Leverton
Sphaerophoria scripta, Linn. S. Leverton, abundant ;
Treswell ; Thorney
— menthastri, Linn., var. picta, Mg. N. and S.
Leverton ; Blidworth
— flavicauda, Ztt., var. nitidicollis, Zett. S. Leverton
Baccha obscuripennis, Mg. 5. Leverton and Treswell
Wood, not uncommon ; Strelley
Ascia podagrica, Fab. S. Leverton, common ; Work-
sop (Houghton)
Rhingia campestris, Mg. N. and S. Leverton, etc.,
common
TT- i n i ii T • ( Both widely distributed
Volucella bombylans, Linn. , '
n T- i and common in the
— pellucens, Linn.
^ county
Eristalis sepulchralis, Linn. S. Leverton
— tenax, Linn. Widely distributed and very common
- intricarius, Linn. Kingston ; Newstead ; S. Lever-
ton ; Everton
- arbustorum, Linn. Common everywhere
- nemorum, Linn. S. Leverton; Treswell Wood;
Edwinstotve
- pertinax, Scop. Everywhere, very common
( Treswell Wood; Newstead;
- horticola, Deg. •< Blidworth; Sherwood Forest;
\ Marnham
Myiatropa florea, Linn. Widely distributed in the
county
Helophilus trivittatus, Fab. Bunny, 23 Aug. 1899
- pendulus, Linn. Of common occurrence.
- transfugus, Linn. Marnham, several specimens
flying about watercress flowers in the old bed
of the Trent, 19 July, 1901
Mcrodon equestris, Fab. Bulwell Forest ; N. Wheat-
ley, type and var. narcissi, Fab.
var. narcissi, Worksop (Miss Alderson)
Criorrhina ranunculi, Pz. / ^'™^'^(W.Harri-
- berberina, Fab. son ^d C J- Wain-
l wright)
• — oxyacanthae, Mg. S. Leverton
- floccosa, Mg. Sherwood Forest (Bradley and Wain-
wright) ; S. Leverton
Brachypalpus bimaculatus, Mcq. Sherwood Forest
(Bradley and Wainwright)
Xylota segnis, Linn. Treswell Wood; Langford Moor
— lenta, Mg. Southwell
— sylvarum, Linn. Treswell Wood ; Langford Moor ;
Wigsley Wood
Syritta pipiens, Linn. Common everywhere
Chrysochlamys cuprea, Scop. Treswell Wood
Chrysotoxum cautum, Harr. Sherwood Forest (Brad-
ley and Wainwright) ; S. Leverton; Treswell Wood
— arcuatum, Linn. Sherwood Forest (Wainwright)
— bicinctum, Linn. S. Leverton; Treswell Wood;
Widmerpool; not uncommon
126
INSECTS
CYCLORRHAPHA (continued)
PROBOSCIDE4 (continued)
CONOPIDAE
Conops vesicularis, Linn. Langford M oar, 10 June,
1900
— strigata, Mg. Langjord Moor, 12 Aug. 1899
— flavipes, Linn. Widely distributed, but not very
common
Physocephala rufipcs, Fab. Wigsley ; Tmteell
Sicus ferrugineus, Linn. Wigs/ey, 7 Aug. 1 899
Myopa buccata, Linn. Bulwell and Sherwood Forests ;
Treswell Wood
— testacea, Linn. Bultvell Forest ; Raintuorth; S.
Leverton
OESTRIDAE
Oestrus ovis, Linn. S. Leverton
TACHINIDAB
Phorocera cilipeda, Rnd. S. Leverton
Tachina nmica, Mg. \
Thelaira leucozona, Pz. J
Olivieria lateralis, Fab. Worksop
5.
(Houghton)
Leverton ; Rampton ; Kingston ; Wigsley ; Thorney
Micropalpus vulpinus, Fin. Blidworth
Echinomyia fera, Linn. Edwinstowe, Shertvood Forest
Plagia ruralis, Fin. Trestvell
Siphona geniculata, Deg. S. Leverton, common ;
Gedling
Trixa oestroidea, Dsv. Trestvell Wood ; Clarborough
Fortisia foeda, Mg. S. Leverton
Cynomyia mortuorum, Linn. S. Leverton
Sarcophaga carnaria, Linn. Widely distributed and
common
— atropos, Mg. Edwinstowe
— agricola, Mg. S. Leverton
• — haemorrhoidalis, Mg. S. Leverton
Metopia leucocephala, Rossi
Sphixapata conica, Fin.
Dexia vacua, Fin. Thorney
MUSCIDAE
Stomoxys calcitrans, Linn. S. Leverton ; Nottingham ;
common
Pollenia rudis, Fab. Worksop (Houghton) ; S. Lever-
ton ; Trestvell ; Linby ; common
Myiospila meditabunda, Fab. S. Leverton
Graphomyia maculata, Scop. S. Leverton ; Sutton, nr.
Retford; common
Musca domestica, Linn.)
— corvina, Fab. j
Cyrtoneura stabulans, Fin.
common
— pabulorum, Fin. ) „
— caesia, Mg. j
Morellia hortorum, Fin.
abundant
Mcsembrina meridiana, Linn.
ton; Cottam ; common
Pyrellia lasiophthalma, Mcq. S. Leverton ; Treswell ;
Wmkburn
Protocalliphora azurea, Fin. Nottingham
Calliphora erythrocephala, Mg. Abundant every-
where
— vomitoria, Linn. Common
Euphoria cornicina, Fab. S. Leverton, common ;
Linby
Generally distributed and
common
Nottingham ; S. Leverton ;
Nottingham ; S. Leverton,
Newstead ; S. Lever-
S. Leverton
S. Leverton ;
CYCLORRHAPHA (continued)
PROBOSCIDE4 (continued)
MUSCIDAE (continued)
Lucilia caesar, Linn. Widely distributed and common
— sylvarum, Mg. Marnham, flying about water-
cress flowers in bed of old Trent
— sericata, Mg. Nottingham ; Worksop ; S. Leverton
ANTHOMYIDAE
Polietes lardaria, Fab. ) 0 ,
- albolineata, Fin. \S-Le™rim> etc., vcrycommon
Hyetodesia incana, Wdm. S. Leverton, common
— lucorum, Fin. S. Leverton ; Grove; Edtvinstotve ;
Winkburn
— marmorata, Ztt.
— serva, Mg.
— variabilis, Fin. Trestcell Wood
• — umbratica, Mg. \
— • laeta, Fin. !• S. Leverton
— lasiophthalma, Mcq. J
— erratica, Fin. Worksop (Houghton)
Tresivell Wood
— basalis, Ztt. Worksop (Houghton) ; Trestvell Wood
- scutellaris, Fin. 5. Leverton ; Trestvell Wood
• — pallida, Fab. Kingston-on-Soar
Alloeostylus flaveola, Fin. Clumber (Miss Alderson)
Mydaea urbana, Mg. S. Leverton, not uncommon
— impuncta, Fin. S. Leverton ; Trestvell Wood
— separata, Mg. S. Leverton ; Trestvell Wood ;
Nottingham
Spilogaster communis, Dsv. Worksop (Houghton) ;
S. Leverton
Hydrotaea irritans, Fin.
— dentipes, Fab.
— armipes, Fab.
Ophyra leucostoma, Wdm. S. Leverton ; Worksop
(Miss Alderson)
Drymia hamata, Fin. S'. Leverton
Hydrophoria conica, Wdm. Treswell Wood
Hylemyia variata, Fin. Worksop (Houghton) ;
Lambley (W. H. Freestone) ; S. Lrverton
— strigosa, Fab. 5. Leverton ; Worksop (Miss Alderson)
Anthomyia pluvialis, Linn. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
— radicum, Linn. S. Leverton, In 1901 some
young cabbages were badly attacked by the
grub of this fly, producing an appearance like
' anbury ' (Thornley)
Pegomyia rufipes, Fin. S. Leverton
— bicolor, Wdm. S. Leverton ; Trestvell
Homalomyia hamata, Mcq. S. Leverton
- scalaris, Fab. Common
— • canicularis, Linn. S. Levcrton
Azelia macquarti, Staeg. \
- zettentedti, Rnd. I s_ ^.^
— triquetra, Wdm.
Coenosia sexnotata, Mg. /
CoRDYLURIDAE
Amaurosoma fasciata, Mg. Trestvell Wood
Norellia spinimana, Fin. S. Leverton
Scatophaga lutaria, Fab. S. Leverton
— stercoraria, Linn. Everywhere abundant
HELOMYZIDAE
Helomyza ustulata, Mg. 5. Leverton
Blepharoptera serrata, Linn. S. Leverton, abundant ;
Nottingham ; Winkburn
S. Leverton, the two
species common
first
127
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
CYCLORRHAPHA (continual)
PROBOSCWE4 (continued)
HELOMYZIDAE (continued}
Tephrochlamys rufiventris, Mg. S. Leverton ; Tresviell
Wood
- flavipes, Ztt. S. Leverton
SdOMYZIDAE
Dryomyza flaveola, Fab. Retford ; S. Leverton
Tetanocera elata, Fab."!
— sylvatica, Mg. [• Treswell Wood
— punctulata, Scop. J
Limnia unguicornis, Scop. S. Leverton; Treswell
Wood
- obliterata, Fab. S. Leverton
Elgiva albiseta, Scop. S. Leverton ; Linby
- rufa, Pz. Cottam
Scpedon sphegeus, Fab. S. Leverton ; Clarborougb
PSILIDAE
Psila fimetaria, Linn. S. Leverton ; Widmerpool
- rufa, Mg. Worktop (Houghton)
Chyliza leptogaster, Pz. Treswell Wood
MICROPEZIDAE
Calobnta cibaria, Linn. } „ T
.. T'. \ S. Leverton
- pctronclla, L,mn. J
ORTALIDAE
Ptilonota centralis, Fab. S. Leverton; Treswell Wood ;
Gamston, nr. Retford (S. Pegler)
Platystoma seminationis, Fab. River-bank, Little-
borough, common
Rivellia syngenesiae, Fab. Worksop (Houghton)
Scoptcra vibrans, Linn. S. Leverton
TRYPETIDAE
Acidia cognata, Wdm. Treswell Wood
- heraclei, Linn. S. Leverton
Spilographa zog, Mg. S. Leverton; Shcnvood Forest (?)
(Wainwright)
Trypeta onotrophes, Lw. A', and S. Leverton ;
Treswell Wood
Urophora solstitialis, Linn. Littleborough ; Treswell
Wood
Tephritis miliaria, Schrk. Treswell Wood
- bardanae, Schrk. Sherwood Forest (C. J. Wain-
wright)
LONCHAEIDAE
Lonchaea vaginalis, Fin."!
- chorea, Fab, > S. Leverton
Palloptera ustulata, Fln.J
— • trimacula, Mg. Sherwood Forest (C. J. Wainwright)
- arcuata, Fin. S. Leverton; Saundby (E. Shaw)
CYCLORRHAPHA (continued)
PROBOSCIDE4 (continued)
SAPROMYZIDAE
Lauxania aenea, Fin. S. Leverton
OPOMYZIDAE
Balioptera combinata, Linn. Treswell Wood
Opomyza germinationis, Linn. S. Leverton ; Treswell
Wood
Pelethophila flava, Linn. S. Leverton
SEPSIDAE
Sepsis violacea, Mg. ) Worksop (Houghton) ; S.
— cynipsea, Linn. } Leverton; Nottingham
Nemopoda cylindrica, Fab. S. Leverton
PlOPHILIDAE
Piophila casei, Linn. S. Leverton; Kingston-on-Soar,
abundant at the Dairy Institute ; Nottingham.
EPHYDRIDAE
Hydrellia griseola, Fin. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
Scatella quadrata, Fin. S. Leverton
DROSOPHILIDAE
Drosophila funebris, Fab. S. Leverton
CHLOROPIDAE
Meromyza pratorum, Mg. Cottam ; Treswell Wocd
— laeta, Mg. Cottam
Chlorops taeniopus, Mg. S. Leverton
— speciosa, Mg. Treswell Wood
- laeta, Mg. S. Leverton
Siphonella laevigata, Fin. S. Leverton
AGROMYZIDAE
Ochthiphila polystigma, Mg. Treswell Wood
BoRBORIDAE
Borborus nitidus, Mg.
- niger, Mg.
— vitripennis, Mg.
- equinus, Fin.
— geniculatus, Mcq.
Sphaerocera subsultans, Fab..
PHORIDAE
Trineura aterrima, Fab.
Phora rufipes, Mg.
EPROBOSCIDE4
HlPPOBOSCIDAE
Ornithomyia avicularia, Linn. Nottingham, on star-
lings
S. Leverton
S. Leverton
HEMIPTERA
This order comprises the bugs, cicads, frog-hoppers, plant-lice, scale-insects, etc., insects
of small or moderate size, all of which are characterized by the modification of the mouth parts
into a piercing and sucking proboscis or beak. Two pairs of wings are usually present, and these
exhibit important differences in the two main groups into which the order is divided. In the
Hemiptera Heteroptera the anterior wings (elytra) are more or less horny except at the tip, which
is membranous, and they fold flat on the back, covering over the more delicate and entirely
membranous hind wings. In the Hemiptera Homoptera, on the other hand, the forewings are
not horny, and scarcely differ in texture from the hind wings ; they slope over the back in a
roof-like manner when at rest. In this group, moreover, the face slopes downwards and back-
128
INSECTS
wards, thus bringing the beak close to the bases of the fore legs. The Heteroptera are almost
without metamorphosis, the newly-hatched young closely resembling the adult except for the
absence of wings, which are gradually developed as the insect approaches maturity. Among
the Homoptera, however, metamorphosis is more marked, the young frequently bearing little
resemblance to their parents.
The great majority of the British Hemiptera are vegetable feeders, living on the juices of
plants ; a few of the Heteroptera, however, are blood-suckers. Some of the Homoptera have the
remarkable habit of enveloping themselves in their earlier stages in a mass of white froth, as in
the well-known ' cuckoo-spit ' frog-hoppers.
The Heteroptera are sub-divided into two groups : (i) the Gymnocerata, comprising all the
terrestrial forms, and the ' pond-skaters,' which live on the surface of water, are characterized by
possessing large and conspicuous antennae ; (2) the Cryptocerata are truly aquatic insects with very
small antennae which are hidden beneath the head. To this group belong the water-scorpion
and the water-boatmen, the latter having the curious habit of swimming on their backs.
Unless otherwise stated the species enumerated below have all been collected by the
Rev. Alfred Thornley, with the exception of a few species collected by myself. The Aphides
and Coccidae of Nottinghamshire are practically untouched, and no list of these can yet be
given.
The arrangement and nomenclature adopted are those of the Catalogue of British Hemiptera,
by E. Saunders and J. Edwards.
HETEROPTERA
GYMNOCERATA
PENTATOMINA
Sehirus bicolor, Linn. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
Pentatoma juniperina, Linn. Nottingham (Ryles)
Piezodorus lituratus, Fab. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
Tropicoris rufipes, Linn. Treswell Wood ; Marnham ;
Sherwood Forest, common
Picromerus bidens, Linn. Kingston (Miss Challans)
Acanthosoma haemorrhoidale, Linn. 5. Leverton
— dentatum, De G. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
— interstinctum, Linn. Langford Moor, common on
birch ; Shencood Forest, common
COREINA
Myrmus myriformis, Fall. Langford Moor
BERYTINA
Neides tipularius, Linn. Barrow Hills, Everton
LVGAEINA
Cymus glandicolor, Hahn. Clumber Park (Pegler)
Stygnus rusticus, Fall. Clumber Park (Pegler) ; S.
Leverton ; Treswell Wood
— arenius, Hahn. Clumber Park (Pegler)
Drymus sylvaticus, Fab. Leverton; Treswell Wood;
Clumber Park and Retford (Pegler)
— brunneus, Sahib. Sutton, near Retford (Pegler)
Notochilus contractus, H. S. Treswell Wood
Scolopostethus affinis, Schill. Leverton; Sutton near
Retford (Pegler)
TlNGIDINA
Piesma capitata, Wolff. S. Leverton and Treswell
Wood, common
Orthostira parvula, Fall. Bramcote (Ryles)
Monanthia ampliata, Fieb. Sutton, near Retford
(Pegler) ; Langford Moor
— cardui, Linn. Sutton, near Retford (Pegler) ; S.
Leverton; Treswell Wood
GYMNOCERATA (continued)
HYDROMETRINA
Hydrometra stagnorum, Linn. S. Leverton ; Kingston ;
Thrumfton ; Nottingham
Velia currens, Fab. Nottingham and Retford districts,
common
Gerris thoracica, Schum. Common
- gibbifera, Schum. S. Leverton; Nottingham;
Cossall
• — lacustns, Linn. Retford; S. Leverton, common
— odontogaster, Zctt. Retford (Pegler) ; Cossall
REDUVIINA
Ploiaria vagabunda, Linn. Treswell Wood
• — culiciformis, De G. S. Leverton
Nabis brevipennis, Hahn. Treswell Wood, on Corylus
— major, Cost. Retford district, not uncommon ;
Barrow Hills, Everton
— flavomarginatus, Scholtz. S. Leverton ; Treswell;
Cottam
— limbatus, Dahlb. Treswell Wood
- ferus, Linn. Retford district
— rugosus, Linn. Retford district, common ; Lang-
ford Moor
SALDINA
Salda saltatoria, Linn. Cottam (Pegler)
— orthochila, Fieb. S. Leverton
— cincta, H. S. S. Leverton and Clumber (Pegler)
- cocksii, Curt. Clumber Park (Pegler)
CIMICINA
Cimex lectularius, Linn. Nottingham, etc.
Piezostethus cursitans, Fall. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Lyctocoris campestris, Fall. S. Leverton
Anthocoris nemoralis, Fab. Clumber (Pegler) ; Tres-
well
— sylvestris, Linn. Retford district, common
129
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
GYMNOCERATA (continued) GYMNOCERATA (continued)
CIMICINA (continued)
Triphleps minuta, Linn. S. Leverton ; Treswell
Microphysa pselaphiformis, Curt. Colwick (Ryles)
— elegantula, Baer. S. Leverton, on oak trunks
CAPSINA
Pithanus maerkeli, H. S. S. Leverton; Button near
Retford ; Treswell Wood, common
Miris calcaratus, Fall. Nottingham and Retford districts,
common
— laevigatus, Linn. S. Leverton; Treswell; Tuxford
(Pegler) ; Sherwood Forest (Ryles), etc.
— holsatus, Fab. Treswell Wood, common
Megaloceroea err.itica, Linn. S. Leverton ; Treswell;
Littleborough
— longicornis, Fall. Cot/am
- ruficornis, Fourc. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
Lcptopterna ferrugata, Fall. Sutton, near Retford
- dolobrata, Linn. Retford district, common ;
Langford Moor
Monalocoris filicis, Linn. Sherwood Forest, abundant
amongst bracken
Pantilius tunicatus, Fab. S. Leverton, on Corylus
Lopus gothicus, Linn. Langford Moor; Sherwood Forest
(Ryles)
Phytocoris populi, Linn. S. Leverton, on tree trunks
- tiliae, Fab. S. Leverton; Treswell Wood; Edwin-
stowe
- longipennis, Flor. Treswell Wood
- reuteri, Saund. Treswell Wood
- ulmi, Linn. Retford district ; Kingsttm-on-Soar,
common on Senecio jacobaea
Calocoris striatcllus, Fab. Southwell; Sherwood Forest ;
Aspley (W. E. Ryles)
— sexguttatus, Fab. Nottingham and Retford districts,
common
— fulvomaculatus, De G. Treswell Wood
- alpestris, Mey. Treswell Wood ; Sherwood Forest,
etc.
— bipunctatus, Fab. Retford district, common ;
Nottingham district
— chenopodii, Fall. Clarborough ; Sherwood Forest
— infusus, H. S. Treswell Wood ; Radcltffe
— striatus, Linn. Treswell Wood ; Sherwood Forest
Oncognathus binotatus, Fab. Cottam, abundant in a
grassy lane
Uichrooscytus rufipennis, Fall. Beeston (Ryles)
Plesiocoris rugicollis, Fall. S. Leverton; Treswell Wood
Lygus pratensis, Fab. Retford and Worksop districts
(Thornley and Pegler)
— contaminatus, Fall. Langford Moor, common on
birch
— pabulinus, Linn. Gunthorfe (Ryles) ; S. Lever-
ton ; Treswell Wood, common
— pastinacae, Fall. Nottingham district (Ryles)
— kalmii, Linn. Gunthorfe (Ryles)
Liocoris tripustulatus, Fab. Radcliffe-on-Trent (Ryles) ;
Clumber (Pegler) ; S. Leverton
Capsus laniarius, Linn. Nottingham, RadcRffe (Ryles)
Rhopalotomus ater, Linn. Aspley Woods, Nottingham
(Ryles) ; S. Leverton, on rushes ; Trestaell
Wood
Dicyphus epilobii, Reut. S. Leverton; Sutton, near
Retford
CAPSINA (continued)
Dicyphus stachydis, Reut. S. Leverton, common in
vicarage garden
— globulifer, Fall. Clumber (Pegler)
Campyloneura virgula, H.S. Radcltffe (Ryles)
Cyllocoris histrionicus, Linn. Beeston (Ryles) ; Tres-
well Wood ; Langford Moor
— flavonotatus, Boh. Southwell (Ryles)
Aetorhinus angulatus, Fab. Treswell Wood, common ;
Nottingham district, common
Mecomma ambulans, Fall. Treswell Wood, common ;
Sutton, near Retford
Orthotylus nassatus, Fab. S. Leverton ; Littleborough
Loxops coccinea, Mey. Radcltffe (Ryles)
Heterotoma merioptera, Scop. S. Leverton, common;
Sutton, near Retford; Nottingham district,
common
Heterocordylus tibialis, Hahn. Clumber (Pegler) ;
Treswell Wood
Malacocoris chlorizans, Fall. Treswell Wood, common
Harpocera thoracica, Fall. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
Byrsoptera rutifrons, Fall. Southwell (]. E. Mason)
Phylus palliceps, Fieb. Aspley Woods, Nottingham
(Ryles) ; Treswell Wood
— melanocephalus, Linn. Treswell Wood; Edwinstowe
— coryli, Linn. Treswell Wood
Psallus betuleti, Fall. Clumber (Pegler) ; Edwinstowe,
common on birch ; Langford Moor
— variabilis, Fall. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
— varians, H. S. Treswell Wood
— salicellus, Mey. S. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
Plagiognathus arbustorum, Fab. Retford district
— viridulus, Fall. Sherwood Forest (Ryles)
CRYPTOCERATA
NAUCORIDINA
Naucoris cimicoides, Linn. N. Whcatley (Rev.T.C. B.
Chamberlin)
NIPINA
Nepa cinerea, Linn. Widely distributed
NoTONECTINA
Notonecta glauca, Linn. S. Leverton, with var. ma-
culata ; Kingston-on-Soar
var. furcata. S. Leverton ; Cossall; Not-
tingham
CORIXINA
Corixa geoffroyi, Leach. S. Leverton, not uncommon
— hieroglyphica, Duf.'l
— sahlbergi, Fieb. J- S. Leverton
— linnaei, Fieb. )
striata, Linn. S. Leverton; Cossall; Radcliffe-on-
Trent
— fallen!, Fieb. S. Leverton
— distincta, Fieb. S. Leverton
— fabricii, Fieb. S. Leverton; Cossall
— coleoptrata, Fab. Cossall
130
INSECTS
HOMOPTERA
CICADINA
Cixius pilosus, Ol. N. Leverton ; Treswell Wood
— nervosus, Linn. Longford Moor, Newark
Liburnia lineola, Germ. Treswell Wood
— difficilis, Edw. S. Leverton
— limbata, Fab. S. Leverton
— lineata, Perr. Treswell Wood
Aphrophora alni, Fall. Widely distributed and
common
— salicis, De G. Treswell Wood
Philaenus spumarius, Linn. Abundant
— Hneatus, Linn. S. Leverton
Ledra aurita, Linn. Treswell Wood
Macropsis lanio, Linn. S. Leverton
Bythoscopus flavicollis, Linn. Edwlnstowe, Sherwood
Forest, common on birch
Pediopsis scutellatus, Boh. Treswell Wood
Idiocerus adustus. H. S. ) „ „ „. ,
r ,-,, ' \ Treswell Wood
— confusus, Flor. J
Evacanthus interruptus, Linn. Kingston-on-Soar
Tettigonia viridus, Linn. Clumber (Pegler)
Acocephalus nervosus, Schr. Ramfton Marsh
— albifrons, Linn. Treswell; Rampton
Athysanus sordidus, Zett. Treswell
CICADINA (continued)
Athysanus communis, J. Sahl.
— obscurellus, Kbm.
— obsoletus, Kbm.
Deltocephalus ocellaris, Fall.
Allygus mixtus, Fab.
Thamnotettix prasina, Fall.1]
— subfuscula. Fall.
— cruentata, Panz. J
— crocea, H. S. S. Leverton ,
Limotettix sulphurella, Zett.'
Alebra albostriella, Fall.
Chlorita viridula, Fall.
Eupteryx urticae, Fab.
— stachydearum, Hardy
— auratus, Linn.
— abrotani, Dougl.
- pulchellus, Fall. S. Leverton ; Edwlnstowe
Typhlocyba rosae, Linn. ~j
- quercus, Fab. I S. Leverton, common
Zygina flammigera, GeofFr.J
PSYLLINA
Livia juncorum, Latr.
Psylla crataegi, Schr.
\
S. Leverton
Treswell Wood
Treswell Wood
S. Leverton
Gotham, on Juncus
S. Leverton
MYRIAPODA
Centipedes and Millipedes
The Myriapods of Nottinghamshire appear to have received no attention from local zoologists,
nothing having hitherto been published concerning them. The scanty particulars given in this
note are founded upon specimens collected casually by the writer during the last two or three years ;
the great majority of these are, however, still unidentified and consequently no list of the species
can yet be given.
The Myriapods are terrestrial animals found under stones and logs lying on the ground, under
the loose bark of dead trees and among dead leaves and rubbish. The body is divided into a
large but variable number of nearly similar segments or rings, and is provided with numerous pairs
of legs : the head bears a pair of antennae varying in length in the different species, and eyes may
be present or absent.
The class is divisible into two orders : the Chilopoda or Centipedes, active, swiftly-running forms,
which prey upon living animals, and possess formidable poison fangs, and one pair of legs to each
body-ring ; and Chilognatha or Millipedes, which are vegetable feeders, very sluggish in their move-
ments, and have two pairs of legs to each body-ring. To the latter group belong the species of
lulus, commonly known as ' wire-worms,' which are often very injurious to cultivated crops, but are
otherwise harmless and inoffensive.
CHILOPODA
Centipedes
The family Lithobiidae includes a number of very active species which run with great
rapidity when disturbed. The body is relatively short and depressed, and furnished with fifteen
pairs of legs. Eyes are present.
Lithobius forficatus (Linn.) is abundant everywhere in Nottinghamshire under stones and logs
and among dead leaves both in town gardens and in the open country. One and probably two
other species also occur in the county.
The Geophilidae are slow-moving centipedes with very long, slender bodies, no eyes, and a
large but variable number of pairs of legs. The genera Geophilus and Linotaenia are each represented
in Nottinghamshire by at least one species. The last-named genus includes the luminous or
phosphorescent centipedes.
CHILOGNATHA OR DIPLOPODA
Millipedes
The families Polyxenidae and Glomeridae are each represented in Great Britain by a single
species, and both of these are found in Nottinghamshire Polyxenus lagurus (Linn.), a pretty and
'31
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
minute millipede, occurs under stones and bark of dead trees in several localities. The ' pill-milli-
pede,' Glomeris margmata (Vill.), is a short broad millipede of the size and shape of the common ' pill-
woodlouse,' which it also resembles in its ability to roll up into a spherical ball when disturbed.
It is however easily distinguished from the woodlouse by the large size of the posterior segment of
the body, and by the narrow white border to each segment.
Of the family Polydesmidae one species, Polydesmus complanatus (Linn.), is very common with
us, occurring chiefly under rotten logs lying on the ground. Other species will probably be
found among the material collected by the writer when properly examined.
Atractosoma folydesmoides (Leach), belonging to the family Chordeumidae, has been found in
Nottingham.
Individuals of one or more species of the lulidae occur abundantly in Nottinghamshire, and
are locally known as ' wireworms.'
ARACHNIDA
Spiders, Harvestmen, and False-scorpions
Spiders may be readily distinguished from insects by the following characters among others : —
In insects the body is clearly divided into three separate regions — head, thorax, and abdomen, the
last-named being distinctly segmented, while in spiders the head and thorax are completely fused
together, forming the cephalothorax, which is connected with the abdomen by a short stalk or
pedicle ; only two distinct parts are therefore visible ; the abdomen is not segmented. The eyes of
spiders are simple, while insects possess compound eyes, although many have simple eyes in addition.
Insects have three pairs of legs, spiders possess four pairs. In front of the walking legs all spiders
possess two pairs of jointed appendages ; the anterior of these are called the chelicerae or falces, and
are formidable claw-like pointed fangs, each containing a poison-gland ; these are used for seizing
and killing the prey. The hinder pair are the pedipalps or palpi ; they lie on either side of the
mouth, and the basal part of each (the maxilla) is used as a masticatory organ, while the remaining
portion forms the palpus or feeler ; the terminal joint of this is in the male spider modified into an
accessory organ of reproduction.
The terminal joint, or tarsus, of each of the eight legs ends in either two or three curved
claws, and in some spiders there is on the last joint but one (metatarsus) of the fourth pair of legs a
peculiar comb-like organ termed the ' calamistrum,' consisting of a longitudinal row of curved
bristles.
The silken lines which all spiders produce are emitted from a group of six nipple-like ' spinners '
situated on the underside of the hind end of the abdomen. In those spiders which possess a
calamistrum there is also, immediately in front of the spinners, a paired organ, the so-called
' cribellum,' perforated by numerous fine pores through which silk is emitted and combed out by the
calamistrum so as to become flocculent, and to assist in the entanglement of their prey.
The respiratory organs of spiders are tubular tracheae and book-leaf tracheae (' book lungs ')
opening to the exterior by slit-like apertures or stigmata situated in the anterior part of the under-
side of the abdomen. Some have book-leaf tracheae only, others possess both book-leaf and tubular
tracheae.
Unlike most insects, spiders undergo no metamorphosis, but they moult or cast their skin
several times before reaching the adult state. All spiders are carnivorous, preying upon other
animals, chiefly insects, which they capture either by leaping suddenly upon them, or more com-
monly by spinning webs or snares in which the insect prey becomes entangled.
In the Phalangidea or harvestmen the body is undivided, the abdomen being joined to the
cephalothorax along its whole breadth, instead of being connected with it by a narrow pedicle as
in spiders. The abdomen is segmented, the eight legs are very long and slender, and the simple
eyes are only two in number.
The Chernetidea or false-scorpions are minute arachnids occurring amongst moss and dead
leaves, or under stones, etc., and easily recognized by their peculiar palpi, which are very large
and terminate in pincers or forceps. They thus resemble miniature scorpions, except that they
have no tail.
Nothing whatever appears to have been known concerning the arachnids of Nottinghamshire before
1903, when the present writer began to pay attention to them for the purposes of this History. In
the course of two seasons' collecting 169 species of spiders, fourteen species of harvestmen, and five
of Chernetidea have been taken in the county, and while more extended research will doubtless result
in the discovery of many more species, the list given below will compare favourably with those of
most other counties whose arachnid fauna has been worked out. In the preparation of this list the
132
SPIDERS
writer has been greatly assisted by the Rev. T. C. B. Chamberlin, M.A., who has collected most
indefatigably at North Wheatley and elsewhere near Retford. Dr. G. W. Chaster, of Southport
contributed a number of specimens picked up while collecting Coleoptera in Sherwood Forest in June,
1904, and among these were several rare species. Specimens have also been contributed by the
Rev. A. Thornley, M.A., and Mr. A. H. Pearson, and a few records by Miss E. M. Alderson
and Mr. J. T. Houghton.
In a group so little worked as the arachnida, and one presenting so many difficulties in the
identification of the more obscure or closely allied species, it is of the utmost importance that the
determinations should be beyond question, and it is therefore gratifying to know that every species
enumerated below is vouched for by our highest authority on these creatures, the Rev. O. Pickard-
Cambridge, F.R.S., who most generously undertook the examination of the entire collection.
Lists of the species collected during the seasons 1903 and 1904 have been published in the
fifty-first and fifty-second Reports of the Nottingham Naturalist? Society. The arrangement and
nomenclature adopted are those of the Rev. O. Pickard-Cambridge in his List of British and Irish
Spiders, Monogr. of British Phalangidea, and Monogr. of British Chernetidea.
ARANEIDEA
Spiders
DYSDERIDAE
The spiders of this family have six eyes and two
pairs of stigmatic openings situated near the anterior
end of the ventral surface of the abdomen, the open-
ings of each pair being in close proximity to one
another ; the anterior pair communicate with book-
lungs, the posterior pair with tubular tracheae.
1. DysJera crocota, C. L. Koch
Headon (T. C. B. C.).
A large and handsome spider, with chestnut-red
cephalothorax and legs, and dull yellow elongated
abdomen ; there are two tarsal claws, and the eyes are
arranged in the form of a horse-shoe with the ends
directed forwards.
2. Harpactes hombergii, Scop.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
Known by its slender somewhat ant-like form,
nearly black cephalothorax and pale abdomen, three
tarsal claws, and eyes arranged in a circle.
3. Segestria senoculata, Linn.
Rather common under loose bark on old
palings : Colwick Park ; Oxton Bogs ; South-
well ; Lambley ; Widmerpool ; Langford
Moor ; Calverton Hill, etc.
A slender elongated spider, easily recognized by the
black diamond-shaped patches on a dull buff ground
on the dorsal surface of the abdomen, the three tarsal
claws, and the arrangement of the eyes, which are
grouped in three pairs, the central pair being placed
transversely and the two lateral pairs longitudinally.
4. Oanopt pulcher, Tempi.
Nottingham, two or three specimens in a heap
of old flower-pots in a garden ; Lambley ;
Langford Moor.
Recognizable by its small size (one-twelfth of an
inch or less in length), orange-red colour, large oval
pearly eyes, and two tarsal claws.
DRASSIDAE
Includes mostly hairy spiders of elongated form and
usually sombre colour, with eight eyes in two trans-
verse rows, and two tarsal claws.
DRASSIDAE (continued)
5. Drassus cupreus, Blackw.
Barrow Hills, Everton (A. T.) ; Oxton Bogs ;
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe.
6. Drassus pubescent, Thor.
Bulwell Forest; Blidworth.
7. Drassus troglodytes, C. L. Koch
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
8. Drassus blackwallii, Thor.
North Wheatley, near Retford (T. C. B. C) ;
S. Leverton (A. T.); Strclley; Lambley.
A nocturnal dark very hairy spider, often found
roaming about on the walls of houses and outbuildings;
also found under bark on old palings.
9. Micaria pulicaria, Sund.
Sherwood Forest, between Edwinstowe and
Budby ; Langford Moor.
A very beautiful and brilliant little spider, dark
coloured, iridescent and shining.
10. Phrurolithus festivus, C. L. Koch
Quarry near Bulwell Wood Hall.
1 1 . Clubiona terrestris, Westr.
Worksop, under stones ; Calverton Hill and
Wollaton, under bark on old palings.
12. Clubiona reclusa, Cambr.
Edwards Lane, Nottingham, among dead leaves;
Calverton Hill, under bark on palings.
13. Clubiona holosericea, De G.
Oxton Bogs ; Budby Carr.
1 4. Clubiona pallijula, Clerck
Common, and widely distributed.
15. Clubiona brevipes, Blackw.
S. Leverton (A. T.) ; Edwinstowe ; Roe Wood,
Winkburn ; Langford Moor. Beaten from
trees, chiefly oak.
1 6. Clubiona comta, C. L. Koch
Common on trees in woods throughout the county
17. Clubiona corticalis, Walck.
Common under bark on old palings, etc.
133
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
DRASSIDAE (continued)
1 8. Z.ora maeulata, Blackw.
Eakring Brail Wood ; Roe Wood, Winkburn ;
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe ; Langford
Moor.
19. Anyphoena accentuata, Walck.
Epperstone Park; Langford Moor; Eakring Brail
Wood ; Wigsley Wood ; Roe Wood, Wink-
burn. Occurs on the foliage of various trees,
but is not very common, although widely dis-
tributed.
20. Agroeca brunnea, Blackw.
Langford Moor, under bark.
DICTYNIDAE
Spiders with eight eyes in two transverse curved
rows, those of each lateral pair being close together.
There are three tarsal claws, and the calamistrum and
cribellum are present in all the species.
21. Dictyna arundinacea, Linn.
Onheatherand rushes, common; Langford Moor;
Budby Carr; Wigsley Wood.
22. Dictyna uncinata, Westr.
Wilford ; Lambley ; Budby, Sherwood Forest ;
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
23. Dictyna pusllla, Westr.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
24. Dictyna latens, Fab.
Barrow Hills, Everton (A. T.).
25. Lethla humilis, Blackw.
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Langford Moor.
26. Amauroblus ferox, Walck.
Nottingham, in cellars. Worksop (J. T. H.) ;
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Barrow Hills,
Everton.
A very large dark and forbidding-looking spider,
common in cellars and outbuildings, but occurring
ilso under stones and logs far away from houses.
27. Amaurobius simi/is, Blackw.
An abundant house-spider, occurring in cellars
and outhouses, in crevices in walls, under
boards, etc. The tubular snares are familiar
objects in crevices of the sandstone rock in
and about Nottingham.
28. Amaurobius fenestralis, Stroem.
Abundant under loose bark on old palings, logs,
and trees ; also occasionally under stones and
the copings of walls.
AGELENIDAE
The members of this family have eight eyes placed
in two more or less curved rows, those of the lateral
pairs not being contiguous to each other. The legs
are hairy and spinose, and three tarsal claws are
present. Calamistra and cribellum are absent.
29. Cryphoeca silvicola, G. L. Koch
Blidworth.
30. Cryphoeca diverse, Cambr.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
AGELENIDAE (continued}
31. Coehtes atropos, Walck.
Pleasley Vale, under stones.
3 2. Argyroneta ajuatica, Latr.
Ditches near the Trent, Lenton ; pool near
Trent Bridge, Nottingham.
This is the large and well-known ' water-spider,'
which can swim and dive with ease, and constructs its
silken dome-shaped nest beneath the surface of the
water.
33. Tegenaria parietina, Fourcr.
Worksop (J. T. H.).
34. Tegenaria derhamii, Scop.
An abundant house spider everywhere in the
county.
HAHNIIDAE
The spiders of this family have usually been in-
cluded in the Agelenidae, but may be distinguished,
as pointed out by the Rev. O. Pickard-Cambridge,
by the disposition of the six spinners in a single
transverse nearly straight row, the two outside ones
— representing those of the usual superior pair — being
the largest and the longest.
35. Habnla montana, Blackw.
Langford Moor, among dead leaves on the ground
under pine trees.
THERIDIIDAE
A very large family, including spiders mostly of
small size with relatively large, often nearly globular,
abdomens. The eight eyes are situated in two curved
transverse adjacent rows, the four centrals forming a
quadrangle. Three tarsal claws are present.
36. Eplslnus truncatus, Walck.
Langford Moor.
37. Theridion formosum, Clerck
Langford Moor.
38. Theridion sisyphlum, Clerck
Rather common amongst the foliage of trees and
shrubs in many localities throughout the
county.
A handsome spider, with the abdomen beautifully
variegated with reddish, brown, yellow, and white
markings.
39. Theridion vittatum, C. L. Koch (T. pulchellum,
Walck.)
Langford Moor ; Sherwood Forest, near Edwin-
stowe; Widmerpool ; Crown End Wood,
West Leake.
40. Theridion denticulattim, Walck.
A pretty little spider occurring in all parts of
the county.
41. Theridion simile, C. L. Koch
Langford Moor, beaten from heather, etc.
42. Theridion variant, Hahn
Widely distributed, and common in some locali-
ties : found among heather, foliage, on palings
in gardens, etc.
43. Theridion tine turn, Walck.
Langford Moor, beaten from heather.
134
SPIDERS
THERIDIIDAE (continued)
44. Therldion pictum, Hahn
S. Leverton (A. T.) ; N. Wheatley (T. C. B.C.);
Budby, Sherwood Forest.
A beautiful species : the abdomen has a central
longitudinal band of a red colour, with a yellow border
on either side of it.
45. Tfieridion tepidariorum, C. L. Koch
Lowdham (A. H. P.) ; N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ;
Trowell.
A large, rather plainly coloured species, found in
greenhouses and conservatories.
46. TAeridion bimaculatum, Linn.
Blidworth ; Budby ; Langford Moor.
47. Tfieridion pallens, Blackw.
Wollaton ; Epperstone Park ; Edwinstowe, Sher-
wood Forest ; Roe Wood, Winkburn ; Lang-
ford Moor ; Wigsley Wood.
A minute pale yellow spider, with the abdomen
more or less marked or suffused with black, especially
in the male. It occurs on heather and among
herbage and the foliage of trees.
48. Nesticus cellulanus, Clerck
N. Wheatley (T.C.B.C.); Nottingham, in cellar.
49. Phyllonethis Kneata, Clerck
Very common among foliage of trees in woods
throughout the county.
A pretty spider of a pale yellow colour, often with
two conspicuous longitudinal carmine-coloured bands
on the dorsal surface of the abdomen.
50. SteatoJa bipunctata, Linn.
Common in crevices and under copings of walls,
under bark on old palings, on windows of
outhouses, etc., everywhere in the county.
51. Crustulina guttata, Wid.
Budby, Sherwood Forest ; Langford Moor.
52. Enoplognatha thoracica, Hahn
Bagthorpe, Nottingham ; Budby.
53. Ptdanostethus lividus, Blackw.
Burton Joyce, in a patch of liverwort (Cono-
cephalus) ; Langford Moor, under dead leaves.
54. Bolyphantes bucculentus, Clerck
Oxton Bogs.
55. Bolyphantes alticeps, Sund.
Pleasley Vale.
56. Bolyphantes luteolus, Blackw.
Edwinstowe, Sherwood Forest.
57. Drapetisca lociafu, Sund.
Barrow Hills, Everton ; Sherwood Forest ; Lang-
ford Moor ; Epperstone Park ; Widmerpool ;
West Leake Hills. Rather common in some
of these localities among the foliage of trees
and bushes.
58. Stemonyphantes Rneata, Linn.
Occurs under stones, logs of wood, heaps of
straw, etc., in several localities about Notting-
ham ; also at Sherwood Forest, Clipston Wolds,
etc. N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
THERIDIIDAE (continued)
59. Linyphia insignis, Blackw.
Beauvale Woods; Oxton Bogs; Crown End
Wood, West Leake ; Widmerpool ; Roe Wood,
Winkburn ; Wigsley Wood.
60. Linyphia montana, Clerck
Under bark of palings, and on foliage of trees
and bushes, in many localities throughout the
county.
6 1 . Linyphia triangularis, Clerck
A very abundant spider, occurring on heather
and furze bushes on commons, on hedges, and
on shrubs and trees in plantations and woods
everywhere throughout the county.
62. Linyphia peltata, Wid.
Beauvale Woods ; Widmerpool ; Owthorpe ;
Cotgrave ; Epperstone Park ; Eakring Brail
Wood ; Roe Wood, Winkburn ; Sherwood
Forest, Edwinstowe. N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.)
63. Linyphia pusilla, Sund.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.) ; N. Wheatley
(T. C. B. C.) ; Blidworth ; Langford Moor
64. Linyphia hortensis, Sund.
Widmerpool ; Sherwood Forest.
65. Linyphia clathrata, Sund.
Daybrook ; Southwell ; Eakring Brail Wood ;
Roe Wood, Winkburn ; Langford Moor.
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.)
The four last species occur on heather, bushes, and
among the foliage of the lower branches of trees.
66. Labulla thoracica, Wid.
North Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Lambley ;
Bulcote.
67. Leptyphantes minutus, Blackw.
Ranby (T. C. B. C.) ; Nottingham district, in
several places ; Widmerpool.
68. Leptyphantes nebulosus, Sund.
Nottingham, in cellar ; Bagthorpe.
69. Leptyphantes leprosus, Ohl.
Nottingham, in deep rock cellar ; Bulcote.
70. Leptyphantes blacka'allii, Kulcz.
North Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
71. Leptyphantes obscurus, Blackw.
On heather and among foliage of trees and
shrubs. Blidworth ; Epperstone Park ; Budby
and Edwinstowe, Sherwood Forest ; Eakring
Brail Wood.
72. Leptyphantes pallidus, Camb.
Southwell (F. O. P.-Cambridge).
73. Leptyphantes Jlavipes, Blackw.
Langford Moor, on heather.
74. Leptyphantes tenuis, Blackw.
North Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Nottingham dis-
trict, in several places, common ; Sherwood
Forest ; Widmerpool.
75. Bathyphantes variegates, Blackw.
Bulwell Forest ; Blidworth ; Epperstone Park ;
Langford Moor ; Budby and Edwinstowe,
Sherwood Forest.
135
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
THERIDIIDAE (continued}
76. Bathyphantes concohr, Wid.
Under stones, logs, etc., in many localities
around Nottingham ; Worksop. N. Wheatley
(T. C. B. C.).
77. Bathyphantes nigrinus, Westr.
Wilford ; Oxton Bogs ; Beauvale Woods.
78. Bathyphantes pullatus, Cambr.
Eakring Brail Wood ; Oxton Bogs.
79. Bathyphantes parvulus, Westr.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
80. Bathyphantes gracilis, Blackw.
Bagthorpe, Nottingham ; Widmerpool.
8 1 . Bathyphantes dorsalis, Wid.
Budby and Edwinstowe, Sherwood Forest ; Cot-
grave Wolds. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
82. Tmeticus rufui, Wid.
Bagthorpe, Nottingham ; Langford Moor, on
heather, and under heaps of dead leaves in
early spring.
83. Tmeticus abnormis, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.) ; Wollaton ; Lang-
ford Moor, on heather.
84. Tmeticus blcolor, Blackw.
Bagthorpe, Nottingham, in numbers ; Arnold ;
Sutton, near Granby ; Worksop.
85. Microneta rumtr'u, C. L. Koch
Foss Road, Widmerpool ; Cossall.
86. Microneta saxatifii, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe.
87. Sintula dlluta, Cambr.
Langford Moor.
88. Maso sundevattll, Westr.
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe.
89. Gongylidlum rufipes, Sund.
S. Leverton (A. T.) ; N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ;
Widmerpool ; Eakring Brail Wood ; Beauvale
Woods ; Roe Wood, Winkburn ; Wigsley
Wood.
90. Gongylidlum fuscum, Blackw.
Bagthorpe, Nottingham, under heaps of straw in
winter ; Wigsley Wood, on foliage of trees.
91. Gongylidlum apicatum, Blackw.
Southwell (F. O. P.-Cambridge).
92. Gongylidlum tuberosum, Blackw.
Oxton Bogs.
93. Tito vagans, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
94. Erigone dentipalpis, Wid.
Nottingham ; Trowell ; Widmerpool.
95. Erigone atra, Blackw.
• Bagthorpe, Nottingham, under straw heaps, in
winter ; Langford Moor, and Sherwood
Forest, on heather and shrubs.
96. Lophomma herbigradum, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
THERIDIIDAE (continued)
97. Dicymbium nlgrum, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
98. Neriene rubens, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe ; Oxton Bogs ;
Langford Moor. N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
99. Neriene rubella, Blackw.
Epperstone Park ; Crown End Wood, West
Leake.
100. Dicyphus cornutus, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.) ; N. Wheatley
(T. C. B. C.) ; Langford Moor.
101. Dicyphus bituberculaius, Wid.
Wilford ; Oxton Bogs, under bark.
1 02. Dismodicus bifrons, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe.
103. Diplocephalus fuscipes, Blackw.
Langford Moor.
104. Entelecara acuminata, Wid.
Langford Moor ; Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe.
105. Entelecara erythnpus, Westr.
Colwick Park ; Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe ;
Cossall.
1 06. Peponocranium ludicrum, Cambr.
Blidworth ; Langford Moor, common on heather.
107. Pocadicnemls pumllus, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe.
1 08. M etopobactrus prominulus, Cambr.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
109. Gnephalocotes obscurus, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
1 10. Tapinocyba praecox, Cambr.
Langford Moor.
111. Baryphyma pratcnsis, Blackw.
Wilford, under an old tin can in hedge-bottom.
112. Wideria antica, Wid.
Langford Moor, on heather.
113. Wlderiafugax, Cambr.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
114. Wakkenaera acuminata, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.) ; Bagthorpe and
Basford, Nottingham ; Cossall.
115. Ceratlnella brevipes, Westr.
Langford Moor.
MIMETIDAE
The spiders included in this family resemble the
Theridiidae in most respects : the eight eyes are
disposed as in the latter family, there are three tarsal
claws, and the legs are very spinose.
1 1 6. Era thoracica, Wid.
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe ; Langford Moor.
EPEIRIDAE
The members of this family have eight eyes situated
in two rows, and disposed in three rather widely
separated groups — two lateral groups of two eyes each
and a central group of four which form a quadrangle.
136
SPIDERS
EPEIRIDAE (nnthueJ)
The tarsal claws are three in number, but super-
numerary pectinated claws are often present. Mostly
spiders with bright colours and distinctive pattern of
markings, spinning orbicular or wheel-shaped snares.
1 1 7. Tetragnatba extensa, Linn.
Annesley Park ; Budby Carr.
1 1 8. Tetragnatba solandrii, Scop.
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; on sedges, Wollaton
Canal ; on palings in garden, Lambley ; among
foliage of trees, Epperstone Park ; on marsh-
thistle, Wigsley Wood.
1 19. Tetragnatba obtusa, C. L. Koch
Among the foliage of trees : Sherwood Forest,
Edwinstowe ; Langford Moor ; Cotgrave
Wolds.
1 20. Pacbygnatba degeerii, Sund.
In many localities about Nottingham ; Oxton
Bogs ; Edwinstowe, Sherwood Forest, beaten
from low trees commonly.
I z I . Pachygnatha clerckii, Sund.
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Bagthorpe, Not-
tingham, common under heaps of straw in
stubble field, in winter ; Wilford ; Radcliffe-
on-Trent ; Oxton Bogs, rather commonly ;
Worksop.
122. Pachygnatha Ksteri, Sund.
Eakring Brail Wood, among grass in riding.
123. Meta segmerttata, Clerck
Abundant and universally distributed throughout
the county.
124. Meta merianae, Scop.
Nottingham, on plants in garden ; Langford
Moor, on trees and heather.
125. Cyclosa conica, Pall.
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Langford Moor
126. Singa albovittata, Westr.
Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe, taken by sweep-
ing grass.
127. Zilla x-notata, Clerck
A very common spider : found throughout the
county under cross-bars of gates and palings,
under the coping of walls, in greenhouses and
outbuildings, etc.
128. Zilla atrica, C. L. Koch.
Nottingham ; Oxton Bogs; Winkburn; Widmer-
pool, etc.
129. Epe'ira gibbosa, Walck.
Worksop district (E. M. A.) ; Langford Moor ;
Sherwood Forest ; Crown End Wood, West
Leake.
130. Epeira pyramidata, Clerck
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
131. Epeira diademata, Clerck
One of our largest and most familiar spiders,
common in gardens, on heaths, and in woods.
I 137
EPEIRIDAE (continued}
132. Epeira cucurbitina, Clerck
Clumber (E. M. A.). ; N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ;
Sherwood Forest, near Edwinstowe ; Langford
Moor, rather common.
A very beautiful spider, easily recognized by its
reddish cephalothorax and legs, and bright apple-
green abdomen with a red blotch at its hinder
extremity.
133. Epeira triguttata, Fab.
Langford Moor ; Roe Wood, Winkburn.
134. Epeira umbratica, Clerck
Rather common, and widely distributed through-
out the county, occurring under bark on old
palings, in the crevices of wooden fences, etc.
Easily known by its large size, flat oval abdo-
men, and very dark brown colour with paler
markings, and two large yellowish-white spots
on the under side of the abdomen.
135. Epeira quadrata, Clerck
Bulwell Forest ; Barrow Hills, Everton.
A very large and handsome species, forming its large
orbicular snare chiefly in furze bushes on commons.
136. Epeira sc lope taria, Clerck
Lowdham, in greenhouses, abundant (A. H. P.) ;
Colwick Park, under bark on old fence-rail.
137. Epeira cornuta, Clerck
Colwick, Barrow Hills, Everton.
138. Epeira patagiata, C. L. Koch
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Colwick.
THOMISIDAE
The spiders of this family have a short and broad
cephalothorax and abdomen and laterally extended
legs. This crab-like shape is accompanied by a crab-
like motion, the species moving freely either forwards,
backwards, or sideways. There are eight eyes in two
rows, arranged in a semicircle or crescent with the
convexity directed forwards. Tarsal claws, two. No
web or snare is constructed.
139. Diaea dorsata, Fab.
Langford Moor.
A lovely species in which a clear pale green is the
prevailing colour, occurring among the foliage of trees,
especially fir.
140. Xysticus cristatus, Clerck
Occurs more or less commonly in every part of
the county.
141. Xysticus pint, Hahn
Langford Moor, common.
142. Xysticut lanio, C. L. Koch
Roe Wood, Winkburn ; Wigsley Wood.
143. Xysticus erraticus, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.).
144. Xysticus ulmi, Hahn
Roe Wood, Winkburn.
145. Oxypti/a praticola, C. L. Koch
North Wheatley (T. C. B. C.)
Lambley.
Nottingham
18
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
THOMISIDAE (continued')
1 46. Oxyptila trux, Blackw.
Eakring Brail Wood.
147. Philotiromus dispar, Walck.
South Leverton (A. T.) ; N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
148. Pbilodromut aureolus, Clerck
Abundant on heather, fir, and other trees in
woods and plantations throughout the county.
149. Tibellus oblongus, Walck.
North Wheatley (T. C. B. C.)
PISAURIDAE
150. Pis aura mlrabltis, Clerck
This, the only British representative of the
family, is a very large spider occurring in all
parts of the county on heaths and in woods,
where the female may be seen about mid-
summer running over the herbage with its
egg-sac attached beneath the cephalothorax.
Later on a large and conspicuous roughly
dome-shaped nest is constructed between the
upright stems of grasses, twigs of heather, etc.,
and in this the egg-sac is enclosed and the
young are hatched out.
The body of this spider is long and narrow, the
legs are long, with three tarsal claws ; the eight eyes
are arranged in three rows : four in the first row in a
transverse line slightly curved backwards, those of the
second and third rows forming a rectangle which is
wider than long.
LYCOSIDAE
Spiders with eight eyes in three rows as in the
Pisauridae, but the first row is straight. There are
three tarsal claws. Many species occur in woods,
running freely over the ground in bright sunshine.
The egg-sac is carried about attached to the spinners,
and the young are also carried for a time after hatch-
ing, crowded together upon the abdomen of the
mother. Some species lurk under stones, and some of
the larger make a burrow in the ground, which they
line with silk. No snare is constructed by members
of this family.
151. Pirata hygnphllus, Thor.
Annesley Park ; Roe Wood, Winkburn ; Eak-
ring Brail Wood.
152. Pirata piraticus, Clerck
Radcliffe-on-Trent ; Cinder Hill Brickyard ;
Oxton Bogs.
153. Trochosa ruricola, De Geer
Cinder Hill Brickyard ; Daybrook ; Wilford
Hill ; Wollaton ; Linby ; Worksop. North
Wheatley (T. C. B. C.); South Leverton
(A.T.).
154. Trochosa terricola, Thor.
Quarry near Bulwell Wood Hall ; Worksop.
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
155. Trochosa picta, Hahn
Worksop (J. T. H.) ; Barrow Hills, Everton.
LYCOSIDAE (continued')
156. Tarentula andrenivora, Walck.
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Barrow Hills,
Everton.
157. Tarentula puheruknta, Clerck
Quarry near Bulwell Wood Hall ; Barrow Hills,
Everton ; Sherwood Forest, Edwinstowe ;
Langford Moor ; Clipston Wolds ; Oxton
Bogs ; Roe Wood, Winkburn ; Eakring Brail
Wood. Worksop (J. T. H.)
158. Lycosa amentata, Clerck
Abundant, especially in woods, in every part of
the county.
159. Lycosa nlgrlceps, Thor.
Blidworth ; Edwinstowe ; Langford Moor.
1 60. Lycosa pullata, Clerck
1 6 1 . Lycosa lugubrls, Walck.
This and the last species are widely distributed
and common in woods and rough waste places.
162. Lycosa prativaga, C. L. Koch
Edingley Hill, near Southwell ; Oxton Bogs ;
Eakring Brail Wood.
163. Lycosa palustrls, Linn.
Eakring Brail Wood.
164. Lycosa monticola, C. L. Koch
N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.) ; Barrow Hills,
Everton ; Clipston Wolds.
SALTICIDAE
The spiders of this family are easily recognized by
the quadrate form of the cephalothorax, and by the
arrangement of the eyes in three rows, forming a large
quadrangle. The anterior row consists of four large
eyes, the two centrals being especially large and usually
iridescent ; the two forming the intermediate row are
minute, and the posterior two are of medium size.
These spiders spin no snare, but utilize their remark-
able leaping powers for the capture of their prey.
165. Eplblemum icenicum, Clerck
This is the common 'jumping spider" so often
seen running and leaping on walls in the hot
sunshine. It is distributed throughout the
county. I have found it at Southwell under
the bark of an old fence in company with
the next species.
1 66. Epiblemum cingulatum, Panz.
Worksop district (E. M. A. and J. T. H.) ;
Calverton Hill ; Oxton Bogs ; Blidworth ;
Southwell ; Langford Moor ; Budby. Found
on palings and under bark on old fences.
167. Heltophanus flavlpes, C. L. Koch
Barrow Hills, Everton ; Oxton Bogs ; Sherwood
Forest, Edwinstowe.
1 68. Euopbrys JrontaRs, Walck.
Warsop ; Worksop ; Budby South Forest (Sher-
wood Forest).
169. Hasarius falcatus, Blackw.
Sherwood Forest (G. W. C.) ; Langford Moor ;
Wigsley Wood.
138
SPIDERS
PHALANGIDEA
Harvestmen
170. Liobunum rotunJum, Latr.
Langford Moor ; Roe Wood, Winkburn ;
Rempstone.
171. Liobunum blackwallii, Meade
North Wheatley (T. C. B. C.); Cotgrave Wolds,
on trees.
172. Phalangium opifio, Linn.
Abundant throughout the county, especially on
trees in woods.
173. Phalangium parietinum, Clerck
Nottingham ; Budby ; Warsop ; N. Wheatley ;
Cotgrave Wolds ; Beauvale Woods.
174. Phalangium laxatile, C. L. Koch
Mansfield ; Barrow Hills, Everton.
175. Platybunus corniger, Herm.
Wilford Hill, near Nottingham.
1 76. Megabunus insignis, Meade
Linby ; Langford Moor.
177. Oligohphus morio, Fabr.
Clumber, (E. M. A.) ; N. Wheatley (T. C. B.
C.) ; Cotgrave Wolds ; Roe Wood, Wink-
burn, etc., common on trees.
178. Oligohphus agrestis, Meade
Grives Wood, Kirkby-in-Ashfield ; Nether Lang-
with ; Roe Wood, Winkburn ; Crown End
Wood, West Leake. Ranby, near Babworth
(T. C. B. C.).
179. ORgolophus tridens, C. L. Koch
Grives Wood, Kirkby-in-Ashfield ; Nether Lang-
with ; Warsop ; Worksop ; Beauvale Woods,
on trees. N. Wheatley (T. C. B. C.).
1 80. Oligohphus palpinalis, Herbst.
Crown End Wood, West Leake.
1 8 1 . Oligohphus hamenii, Kraep.
Under rotten log and fallen gate-post in field
at Bagthorpe, Nottingham, 19 and 24 Novem-
ber, 1903. This is the first record for England,
the species having previously been found in
Great Britain only at Elvanfoot, Lanark, and
Leadhills, by Mr. W. Evans. I took several
specimens on each occasion, and have since
taken it at Daybrook and Wollaton.
182. Nemastoma lugubre, O. F. Muller
Linby ; Worksop ; Nottingham district, in
several places ; Beauvale Woods ; Oxton
Bogs, etc.
183. Nemaitoma chrysomelas, Hermann
Worksop.
CHERNETIDEA
Fahe-scorpions
1 84. Chthonius rayi, L. Koch
Common under stones in old quarries throughout
the Magnesian Limestone district. Near
Bulwell Wood Hall ; Mansfield ; Mansfield
Woodhouse ; Pleasley Vale ; Creswell Crags
quarry ; Worksop. North Wheatley (T. C.
B. C.).
185. Cbthonius tetrachelatus, Preyss.
Quarries in Magnesian Limestone near Bulwell
Wood Hall ; Grives Wood, near Kirby-in-
Ashfield ; and Mansfield Woodhouse.
1 8 6. Obisium muscorum, Leach
Nottinghamshire (W. E. Ryles).
187. Chernes nodosus, Schr.
Two specimens clinging to legs of house-fly at
Worksop (J. T. H.).
1 88. Chernes dmicotdes, Fab.
Near Trent Bridge, Nottingham (Ryles).
ADDENDA
The following species have been added to the Nottinghamshire fauna since the foregoing lists
have been in type : —
INSECTS
EPHEMERIDAE
Centroptilum luteolum, Mall. Cossall ~\
Baetis binoculatus, Linn. Daybrook
Rhithrogena semicolorata, Curt. Linby
Heptagenia sulphurea, Mull. Fiskerton
Caenis (one or more species) Edteinstotce
Carr.
Anchomenus atratus,
(Chamberlin)
COLEOPTERA
Duft. Barrow Hills, Everton
COLEOPTERA (continued}
Hydroporus marginatus, Duft. N. Wheatley (Cham-
berlin)
Laccobius minutus, Linn. A'. Wheatley (Chamberlin)
Cercyon aquaticus, Muls. A'. Wheatley (Chamberlin)
Homalota liturata, Steph. Sherwood Forest (Blatch)
Tachyporus pallidus, Sharp. S. Wheatley (Chamber-
lin)
Oxytelus rufipes, Er. Sherwood Forest, May, 1905
(J. Kidson Taylor)
139
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
COLEOPTERA (continued') COLEOPTERA (continued')
Bythinus bulbifer, Reich. Colwtck Wood (Carr and Notoxus monoceros, Linn. \ Barrow Hills
Ryles) Sitones griseus, Fab. J (Chamberlin)
Hippodamia 1 3-punctata, Linn. Barrow Hills (Cham-
berlin)
Scymnus ater, Kug. Gamston, near Retford (Cham- DIPTERA
-, _, Diplosis tritici, Kirby. ) Kineston-on-Soar
Cryptocephalus fulvus. Goeze. Barrow Htlls, on birch T> -i u .v. u-v T • r rr\. i s
CCh be 1' ) Poecilobothrus nobilitatus, Linn. J (Thornley)
m» . .. T- /-, f i /^-.L Urophora cardui. Linn. Gotham (Thornley)
Melasoma popuh, Linn. Gamston, near Retford (Cham- ,~. . r . c • T . v. 0 /ITI, , s
. J ,r Oscmis frit, Linn. Ktngston-on-Soar (Thornley)
Mordellistena abdominalis, Fab. S. Leverton (Thorn-
ley)
Metoecus paradoxus, Linn. 2V. Wheatley, in wasps'
nests (Chamberlin)
HEMIPTERA-HOMOPTERA
Typhlocyba ulmi, Linn. Nottingham, abundant
ARACHNIDA
ARANEIDEA
8<2 Prosthesima petiverii, Scop. Clipstone, Sherwood Forest (Carr)
loza Diplocephalus cristatus, Blackw. \ Colwtck Wood
JO23 „ latifrons, Cambr. j (Carr)
140
CRUSTACEANS
For the special fauna with which the present chapter is concerned
this county might very well be chosen as a representative region. To
such a preference the contributory circumstances are these : — it occupies
a fairly central position ; it is richly diversified with hills and dales,
rivers and forests ; it is also abundantly supplied with wells, ponds,
gardens, and greenhouses. Under these favouring conditions a student
might probably make himself acquainted with the land and freshwater
crustaceans of England at least as well in Nottinghamshire as in any
equal area of the interior. It is not a question of competition with
maritime counties, where tidal rivers, harbours, brackish pools, and a
saline atmosphere may confuse the results. Only the truly terrestrial and
freshwater species are here to be taken into account. But while the
territory is very attractive for this limited branch of research, it must be
confessed that it is at present to a large extent virgin ground. Hitherto
only two or three investigators have published records of their researches.
Among these, as will be seen, especial acknowledgement is due to
Professor J. W. Carr, M.A., F.L.S., F.G.S., of University College,
Nottingham.
Our inland fauna nowhere illustrates the whole class of Crustacea :
it is entirely barren of the highest and the lowest groups ; there are no
crabs and no barnacles. On the other hand, species intermediate between
these two extremes are far more numerous and far more common than is
generally suspected. An overwhelming proportion of these belong to
the Entomostraca, while comparatively few are distributed among three
orders of the Malacostraca. There is, in fact, only one out of the whole
number that answers to the ordinary popular notion of a crustacean.
This is the river crayfish, Potamobius pallipes (Lereboullet). The generic
name appropriately points to its life in rivers. Its extensive distribution
over the river-system of England is only now being gradually proved, and
is almost certainly subject to some limitations and fluctuations. The
latter are apparently due to epidemical disease or other temporary and
local disasters. The former may be traced to uncongenial conditions of
soil or climate, and will be worthy of more exact consideration when we
are more sure of the precise facts. That a particular district is fertile in
crayfish is easily proved by our finding plenty of specimens in it ; but by
not finding them we cannot at once conclude that there are none to be
found. We have to bear in mind the old logical warning that it is
extremely difficult to prove a negative. However, with regard to the
species now in question, the Rev. Joseph Walker, of Averham Rectory,
141
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Newark-on-Trent, writing under date 6 August, 1903, says: 'It certainly
does not occur in the Trent, nor, as I am aware, in any streams in my
district, Averham, near Newark. The only place I can recollect where
they are to be found, and that is many years ago, was at Shireoaks, near
Worksop.' Similarly Mr. Henry V. Machin, of Gateford Hill, Worksop,
writing on 15 August, 1903, says: 'We have no specimens of the
Astacus fluviatilis nearer than Shireoaks.' At the same time he enclosed
an extract from The Worksop Guardian for Friday, 14 August, 1903, in
which the anonymous writer agrees with him in using the familiar
designation Astacus Jiuviatilis for the species now more correctly known as
Potamobius pallipes. Under the heading ' Naturalist Notes by "Observer,"'
the following account is given : —
I have been very much interested during the past week in watching the proceedings of a
female crayfish (Astacus fuviatilis), which, like many other creatures of a larger growth, has
recently acquired a new summer suit, but, unlike the members of the genus homo, the crayfish
has not to appeal for outside assistance to aid it in this operation.
When it becomes apparent that the limits of expansion have been reached with the old suit,
it loses its sensibility or practically dies, and the constituents of a new shell are deposited between
the body and the old shell. At the appointed time the crayfish simply walks out of its old
home, which is left empty, but marvellously perfect even to the extreme tips of the delicate
antennae.
After the operation the creature rests for a time in a perfectly limp and helpless condition,
until the new shell gradually hardens, and it is once more able to indulge its ready propensity
for bickering and quarrelling with the other members of the tribe. One might also mention the
extraordinary ability for parting with claws, which seem to be regarded by the crayfish as
appendages to be thrown off on the least provocation. Fortunately, Nature has been kind in
this respect ; and the loss of a claw is not a serious matter, as a new one speedily grows in the
place of the discarded member.
As with so many other forms of wild life, Worksop may almost be said to have a monopoly
for the county, as I am not aware that the crayfish occurs in any other part. Anyone who has
seen a lobster may almost be said to have seen a crayfish, for beyond the fact that the lobster is
much larger, and lives in salt water, whilst the crayfish is confined to fresh water, there is
practically no structural difference between the two. The female crayfish changes her shell, in
the manner described above, once each year ; while the more extravagant male requires two
coats in the same period.
The female carries her eggs (which are laid in November or December) with her until they
are hatched, and the young, which appear in May or June, are also carried about for some time
by their parent. Being nocturnal in their habits, and resting by day under stones or in holes
in the banks, these curious creatures are not often observed, which is perhaps as well for them,
seeing that they are not particularly well equipped for offence or defence against larger animals.
Eels particularly are said to be amongst their worst enemies. As they do not appear to do any
harm, and by feeding upon dead animals or other matter found in thewater.no doubt do a great
deal towards keeping it pure, we may be pleased that our local fauna includes such an interesting
crustacean as the crayfish, sometimes called, but erroneously, the fresh water crab.
Upon this agreeably-written notice by a local observer a few com-
ments may be permitted. In regard to the distribution of Potamobius
pallipes within the county, Professor Carr makes it clear that Worksop has
not a monopoly, by supplying the information that the species is ' fairly
common in the River Maun and mill-dams at Mansfield.' * The process
known as exuviation, ecdysis, moulting, or shedding of the outer sheath
of the animal is not peculiar to crayfishes, but a common characteristic
of the whole crustacean class. Not only does it extend to the delicate
tips of the antenna?, the covering of the eyes, the complicated apparatus
of the mouth-organs, but actually includes the lining of the stomach,
\
1 Tram. Nott. Nat. Soc. for 1902-3, p. i (1904).
I42
CRUSTACEANS
although that is not extruded when the rest of the apparel is thrown off.
On the other hand, it would be wrong to regard the operation as
universally simple, as the facile casting of old clouts, to find a fairer and
better fitting costume beneath them. There is often no such ground
for evoking envy in the impecunious children of men. In all species
armed with massive nippers the withdrawal of big muscles through
narrow articulations is a hazardous and probably painful operation. Nor
can it be said without reserve that, prior to the moult, ' the constituents
of a new shell are deposited between the body and the old shell.' The
discarding of the latter exposes indeed the new coat that lay beneath it,
but the fresh vesture is unfinished, not yet properly calcified. This is a
necessary condition of the whole procedure. The muscles first of all
become flaccid for purposes of extraction. They then assume a certain
rigidity. Finally they expand to that fuller capacity which made a
change in the exoskeleton essential. When the coat is once well hardened
by calcareous salts such expansion is no longer possible. In the meantime
the crustacean without a solid crust is exposed to anxiety and peril.
Another incident in the biology of these creatures may at the first glance
be thought rather enviable. Wolves and Spartans have been known to
escape from fetters, and less heroic individuals can avoid the pain and
danger of wounded limbs, by artificial amputation. But the tribe of
crabs and lobsters are provided by Nature herself with a special groove
at which they can easily throw off almost the whole of an inconvenient
leg. Also from the stump they can grow a new limb. But ' Observer '
exaggerates their good fortune in affirming that the loss of a claw is not
a serious matter, and that its restoration may be counted on as speedy.
On the contrary, the repair of appendages is slowly accomplished, perhaps
requiring several exuviations for its completion, and in any case leaving
an interval during which the cripple must be at a grave disadvantage
among its fully-equipped competitors.
Our river crayfish and our common lobster, alike as they are in
general appearance, belong in fact to two different though nearly allied
families, respectively the Potamobiidas and the Nephropsida?. Into all
the distinctions between these two it is unnecessary here to enter ; but, as
an example of them, it may be mentioned that in the former family the
segment that precedes the flexible tail is partially free, whereas in the
lobster it is firmly adherent to the other segments covered by the
carapace.
Crayfishes are tolerably tenacious of life, and can be to a certain
extent domesticated. By the kindness of Mr. Machin and his sister I
was put in communication with Mr. and Mrs. Eddison, of Shireoaks
Hall, near Worksop, with the result that Mr. George Eddison wrote to
me from that residence on 16 August, 1903, as follows : — 'The crayfish
I have pleasure in sending you by to-night's post have been caught this
afternoon in the cascade which runs from one pond to another in the park
here. I have known crayfish to be in these waters for over fifty years,
where they breed. These are of average size.' The specimens packed
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
in damp moss travelled first to Tunbridge Wells, and were forwarded
thence to West Baling, having been in close confinement for about forty-
eight hours. Nevertheless, they arrived in a quite lively condition, and
one of the four, a female, survived to accomplish another postal journey
and to spend several months at Tunbridge Wells apparently much to its
own satisfaction. During this period it occupied a glass bowl 8J inches
in diameter by 3i inches deep. This was supplied with a layer of mud
at the bottom for the tenant to burrow in, with two or three rough
stones to assist it if necessary in sloughing its coat, with the moss in
which it had travelled from its native cascade, with some fresh Anacharis
alsinastrum and other pond weeds ; and, lastly, with water to the depth of
an inch or a little more. For food it was at first provided with sessile-
eyed crustaceans, water boatmen, and other experiments in aquatic pro-
vender ; but in the course of the winter it was found more convenient to
feed it on earthworms. These it did not attempt to kill, but it appeared to
eat them with much satisfaction when they had been converted into meat.
It soon ceased to show any sort of timidity or shyness, and would raise
itself out of the water when approached, as if courting society. It never
made any visible attempt to leave the bowl, yet one morning it was found
on the floor, having apparently effected its escape and fallen from a height
of 14 inches without injury. A considerable time after this escapade,
and without having shed its skin, it eventually met its death on 13 May,
1904. Though this catastrophe happened during my own absence from
home, it need not be assumed that the creature died of grief. It is more
likely to have succumbed to an abrupt rise of temperature which then
occurred. Of the four specimens from Shireoaks Park, the larger pair
were three inches long, the smaller about two inches, in each case the
male and female being approximately equal. I have specimens from
Oxfordshire far more bulky, and over four inches in length.
The sessile-eyed Malacostraca are represented in our inland waters by plenty of individuals
but very few species. Of the Amphipoda only one species, the common Gammarus pulex
(Linn.), has hitherto been recorded for this county. According to Professor Carr it ' occurs
abundantly everywhere in streams and ponds.' * This little shrimp is under an inch in length. '
A crayfish of small dimensions would outweigh a hundred of the Gammarus. Any near
relationship between the two could scarcely be suspected on a cursory inspection. Nevertheless
the structure in both is essentially the same, although in the smaller animal it is in some
respects simpler, and, on the hypothesis of a common origin, might be thought to show fewer
modifications of the ancestral form. The difference in appearance might be compared with that
which exists between a thin boy in an Eton jacket and a portly man in a frock coat. It
depends essentially on the covering capacity of the carapace. This great shield in the crayfish
extends over the segment which carries the eyes and over thirteen other appendage-bearing
segments, which are all except the last in complete coalescence. But in Gammarus the coat
or carapace is so short that seven of this number are left uncovered and remain movably
articulated, like the seven following segments, which in both species alike constitute the pleon
or tail. To several appendages of those uncovered middle segments in the amphipod it will be
found that little sacs or vesicles are attached. These simple bag-like organs are the gills
or branchiae. In the crayfish the corresponding organs are divided up into numerous filaments,
exposing a much larger surface for the oxygenation of the blood in the course of its circulation.
Moreover, they are attached to a greater number of appendages, and instead of hanging freely
in the water, they are efficiently sheltered in a pair of branchial chambers, formed by the
1 Op. cit, p. i.
144
CRUSTACEANS
cheeks of the carapace. In the tail-segments or pleon it is not very difficult to trace similarity
of character throughout the Malacostraca, but the appendages of these segments are modified
in a strange variety of ways to serve different functions. In the higher forms some of them are
altogether dispensed with, just as we find the proudest of the mammals dispensing with their
caudal vertebrae. In that division of the Amphipoda to which Gammarus pulex belongs, the first
three segments of the pleon are always articulated and carry appendages called pleopods
or swimming-legs, with a function corresponding to their name. Their structure is tolerably
simple, consisting of a two-jointed stem and two many-jointed branches. Even when
the animal is stationary their movements are not entirely discontinued, being no doubt
necessary for maintaining a proper flow of water over the branchial vesicles. The foremost
pair is often found directed strongly forwards. In the female the object of this position is to
assist in keeping the eggs or developing young, safe within the marsupial plates. In Gammarus
and its neighbours the fourth, fifth, and sixth pairs of pleon-appendages are known as uropods
or tail-feet. The last pair may be used as a steering apparatus, but sometimes all three assist
the animal in springing movements by which the rowing action of the pleopods is supplemented
or superseded.
The Isopoda are represented here as in other inland districts of our country by a single
freshwater species, Asellus aquaticus (Linn.), noted by Professor Carr as 'common in similar
situations'1 with G. pulex. Many fine specimens of this species were sent me by Mr. H. V.
Machin, of Gateford Hill, Worksop. They reached West Ealing opportunely for the
commissariat of the earlier arrived crayfishes. Much to my surprise, when introduced to one
another the crayfishes made not the slightest attempt to catch or molest the Aselli, and these
on their part swam and crawled about not only within reach of the claws, but close to
the mouths of the crayfishes. Their immunity was not permanent. But my impression is that
crayfishes prefer to take their meals in the dark, and do not much care for game, at least in the
guise of earthworms and water boatmen, until it has been kept a decent time. For a speci-
men of Asellus aquaticus from a shallow well at Chilwell I am indebted to Mr. Charles E.
Pearson, F.L.S.
The Isopoda agree with the Amphipoda in having the eyes not stalked but sessile, and in
having the seven segments of the middle-body or person freely movable, and not covered by
the carapace. On the other hand they differ strikingly in regard to the breathing apparatus,
which is in them transferred from the walking legs to the appendages of the pleon. This
carries with it a transfer of the heart from its position near the head to a position near the tail.
Like Potamobius pallipes among the Macrura, Asellus aquaticus among the Isopoda is a convenient
object of study because of its extreme commonness. But whereas the former species is in most
respects normal to an exemplary degree, the Asellus is very abnormal in the arrangement of the
pleon. Not merely are all the segments of this part consolidated into a single shield,
but beneath this sort of carapace the appendages are eccentric, differing in number in male and
female, and some of them rather widely differing in shape in the two sexes.
Of terrestrial Isopoda the species known to occur in England are now twenty-four in
number. When Bate and Westwood published their work on British Sessile-eyed Crustacea
in 1868 they were only able to record sixteen of these twenty-four, and for Nottinghamshire,
Professor Carr's list in 1904 contained only seven. A collection kindly made for me by
Mr. C. E. Pearson during the winter of this present year, 1905, enables me to make one
addition to the latter number. These eight species are distributed over three families of the
Oniscidea. All of them are commonly known as woodlice. This term, it may be said
in passing, is quite unworthy of their true carcinological rank. They are as much Crustacea
Malacostraca as any crab or lobster that ever was eaten. In the family Trichoniscidae stands
Trichoniscus pusi/lus (Brandt), described by Bate and Westwood3 under the name Philougria
riparia (Kinahan). Professor Carr says of it, ' This tiny claret-brown coloured species is very
common under stones, decaying logs, amongst moss, etc., in damp places. I have found it more
or less abundantly at Basford, Cinder Hill, Wollaton, Kimberley, near Bulwell Wood Hall, at
Kirkby in Ashfield, Mansfield, Warsop, Nether Langwith, Creswell Crags, Shireoaks, and
Worksop.'8 The animal is only a sixth of an inch long, with very minute eyes, the
second antennas much geniculate, and the first pair, as usual in this terrestrial group, very small.
The pleon is abruptly narrower than the middle body, and, as in almost all the Isopoda, has
the terminal segment or telson fused with the preceding segment. This terminal piece has
here a truncate apex, distinguishing it from the corresponding part in the next five species,
1 Op. cit. p. i. 8 Brit. Seti. Crust, ii, 456. s Trans. Nott. Nat.Soc. for 1902-3, p. i,
I 145 19
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
which have the telsonic segment more or less acute. All these five are included in the family
Oniscidae. Oniscus asellus (Linn.), as might be expected, is noted as the commonest species, and
as being 'abundant everywhere under flower pots in gardens, under stones, logs, bark of fallen
trees, etc.' J It reaches two-thirds of an inch in length and more than a third in breadth, the
eyes are rather large, and the second antennae have the five-jointed peduncle not armed with
outstanding spines as in Trichoniscus pusil/us, but smooth and carrying a flagellum of only three
joints. The third, fourth, and fifth segments of the pleon are expanded in such a way that
their lateral edges form a continuous curve with the sides of the middle body. By this last
feature it is easily distinguished both from the preceding species and from the next, which is
of a size somewhat intermediate between the two. This bears a name reminiscent of
summer glades, being by interpretation the shade-loving tenant of mosses, or technically
Philotcia muscorum (Scopoli). It is ' common under stones and logs everywhere around Not-
tingham ; also about Mansfield, Worksop, in Sherwood Forest, etc.' * Of Platyarthrus
ho/mannsfggii (Brandt), Professor Carr says, 'This curious little wood-louse differs from the other
British species in being quite destitute of eyes ; it is pure white in colour, and lives in ants'
nests, where its presence is tolerated probably on account of its being useful as a scavenger.
I have found it commonly in quarries throughout the Magnesian Limestone district, e.g., near
Bulwell Wood Hall, Grives Wood (Kirkby in Ashfield), Mansfield, Warsop, Creswell Crags,
and Worksop ; also in Wollaton brickyard ; and the Rev. A. Thornley has sent me specimens
from a gypsum pit at Clarborough, near Retford.'3 The peculiar habitat and the characters
above given will enable the student when he comes across this widely distributed species to
imitate a celebrated traveller and say, without further introduction, ' Platyarthrus, I presume.'
Its supposed usefulness as a scavenger in the formicarium tallies with the service which
apparently the whole crustacean class are disposed to render to their fellow creatures. They
are a kind of living machinery for converting waste products into palatable foods. Porcellio
icater (Latreille) is reported as ' very common under stones and flower pots in Nottingham
gardens, also under stones and logs, under bark of dead trees, etc., throughout the county.
The usual colour is a greyish slate, but a yellowish or reddish brown variety is not
uncommon.'* This very common species is nearly as long as Oniscus astl/us, but not so broad,
and is distinguished by its more granular integument, and by having the flagellum of the second
antennae two-jointed. Moreover, the two first pairs of appendages in the pleon exhibit an
interesting feature of distinction, in that the outer branches which form opercular plates are
provided with air cavities known as pseudo-tracheae. These must be regarded as a character
acquired since the ancestral Porcellio left the water for terrestrial wandering. In his essay on this
species the learned doctor and professor G. R. Treviranus 6 confirms the observation previously
made by de Geer that the Oniscidea feed on plants, and take their nourishment principally by
night. This is in accord with what I have suggested above as the custom of crayfishes.
Treviranus adds, however, ' In my hotbeds I often saw these creatures still late in the
morning gnawing at the leaves of the plants.'6 Besides P. sealer several other species of this
genus are found in England, and some of these are sure to be eventually discovered in this
county. Indeed, since this prediction was written, it has been in part fulfilled, as will
presently be noticed. Of Metoponorthus pruinosus (Brandt), Professor Carr writes, ' I have only
once met with this species, on 22 June, 1902, when it occurred in considerable numbers
under a log in a garden at Sherwood Rise, Nottingham.'7 This species recalls the appearance
of Philosda muscorum by having the pleon abruptly contracted. But it agrees with Porcellio in
having *a two-jointed flagellum to the second antennae, and air cavities in the pleopods. In
contrast with his single record for this species, Professor Carr speaks of Armadillidium vulgare
(Latreille) as occurring in considerable numbers in several localities, e.g., Nottingham, Kim-
berley, quarry near Bulwell Wood Hall, Mansfield, Warsop, Creswell Crags, Worksop, etc.
' This species,' he adds, ' when disturbed instantly rolls itself into a perfect ball of the size and
colour of a black, or rather blue, pill ; hence the name " Pill woodlouse," commonly applied
to it. Varieties of a brown or yellowish-brown colour are not uncommon.'8 It belongs to the
family Armadillidiidae. It has the telsonic segment truncate as in Trichoniscus pusi/lus, but,
whereas in that species the two slender branches of the uropods extend beyond the telson
quite prominently, here the inner branch is entirely concealed, and the short broad outer
branch helps to form a continuous curve with the telsonic and three preceding segments. To
1 Op. cit. p. 2. s Ibid. p. 2. 8 Ibid. p. 2.
* Ibid. p. 2. 6 yermischte Schriften, i, 50(1816). 8 Ibid. p. 53.
^ Trans. Nott. Nat. Sac. for 1902-3, p. 2. " Ibid. p. 2.
146
CRUSTACEANS
this record of seven species published by Professor Carr may now be added, from Mr. C. E.
Pearson's collection, the interesting species Porcellio dilatatus (Brandt and Ratzeburg). From
P. scaber this is distinguished by its broader shape, less tuberculose integument, and the produced
rounded (not acute) apex of the telsonic segment. Also in the second antennae the two
joints of the flagellum are about equal in length. Bate and Westwood record it only from
Ireland, and say it is found among decaying grass and straw, and appears to be extremely
rare.1 But like many other rarities, it has proved to be not so very uncommon when search
is conducted with a little pertinacity. Though the Oniscidea more than ever withdraw them-
selves from the public gaze during our English winter, Mr. C. E. Pearson was able in a few
days of January and February to collect for me from Lowdham and Chilwell, besides the
above-mentioned P. dilatatus, also P. scaber ; the straight-fronted, smooth-coated Metoponorthus
pruinosus ; and the globe-forming Armadillldium vulgare, including prettily-marked specimens
of the form known as var. vent gat a.
From the Malacostraca, in which a strong cord of uniformity binds together all the diverse
elements, we now pass to the Entomostraca, united indeed to the other sub-class and united
among themselves, but united by less evident and more entangled threads. For species
occurring within this county I am indebted to papers by Mr. Edwin Smith, M.A., published
in The Midland Naturalist* and to an unpublished list by Mr. W. H. Pratt, F.R.M.S., of
Cavendish Hill, Sherwood, Nottingham, sent me through Professor Carr, to whom I am
further indebted for the published record of one species and for specimens of another. From
these several sources sixteen or seventeen species, illustrating the three orders of the sub-class,
can be accredited to the county. The orders in question are named Branchiopoda, Ostracoda,
and Copepoda, in allusion to features which are more or less conspicuously characteristic of
them severally. The names signify respectively gill-footed, valve-shelled, oar-footed. It is in
the last of these groups that we find forms the most shrimp-like, the least remote from the
Malacostracan pattern. Mr. Edwin Smith, in the work already cited, gives an interesting dis-
cussion of the Copepoda, taking as a type the species Cyclops quadricornis from some unspecified
locality. Mr. Pratt records it from ' ponds and ditches about Nottingham in many places,'
and the same authority records Canthocamptus minutus from ' pond at Gamston near Notting-
ham.' In regard to this and two other species Mr. Smith makes the following remarks, some
of which will be useful for wider application : ' Nearly allied to Cyclops, and not much unlike
it in appearance, is Canthocamptus, found abundantly in the ponds about Nottingham. As it
is rather small, the best way to secure a specimen for examination is to place a portion of the
gathering in a shallow dish and look it well over with a pocket lens. A small dipping tube,
made as follows, will be found useful : One end must be drawn to a blunt point with moderate
aperture, the other inserted into a short piece of india-rubber tubing sealed air-tight at the free
extremity. Press the india-rubber between thumb and fore-finger, dip into the water, and by
removing pressure at the right moment the object is sucked up into the tube, whence it may be
expelled by once more pinching the indiarubber. The two commonest species of Cantho-
camptus are C. minutus and C. furcatus. In the female I have often found a curious reddish
substance coming off from the sixth body segment. It is of a hard and horny nature, but its
use is not known. Closely allied to the preceding is Diaptomus castor, easily recognized by its
inferior antennae, which are fully as long as the entire body. I have found it amongst algas in
stagnant ponds.'3
Thus we have apparently four species of normal Copepoda to deal with. As already
indicated, they are extremely common species. Also they are all insignificant in size, but the
three genera belong to three different families, of which the Cyclopidae and Arpacticidas belong
to the division Podoplea, the Diaptomidae to the division Gymnoplea. To explain this sever-
ance we have to notice that the framework of ordinary Copepoda is divided into eleven
segments, the first or cephalic being composite. This is followed by a middle-body or limb-
bearing trunk of five segments, and a pleon or tail-part of five segments without limbs. In
the Gymnoplea, as the name implies, there is a bare or naked pleon, in the sense that the pleon
is devoid of limbs. But in the Podoplea the pleon seems to have annexed one of the limb-
bearing segments of the middle-body, and hence the name of the division, implying that the
pleon carries limbs, points only to a difference which is apparent rather than real. It would
often be delightful if natural history could tell its story in the compendium of a single word,
1 Brit. Sess. Crust, ii, 479.
8 Op. cit. No. I, January, p. 15 ; No. 2, February, pp. 33-37, vol. i (1878).
8 Op. cit. 34.
147
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
but the attempt is never for long successful. Nature continually interposes the necessity for
limitations, explanations, and exceptions. Names the most apt at the time of their choice may
easily become with the increase of knowledge inconvenient and misleading, so that we can only
continue to use them by shutting our eyes to their original significance. In the Diaptomidae
the first antennas in the female are divided into twenty-five articulations, and in the male the
right member of the pair is geniculate. The fifth pair of trunk-legs differ much in the two
sexes and are very unsymmetrical in the male. The female carries a single ovisac or external
egg-bag. The pleon in the male has five distinct segments, but in the female these are
reduced to two or three by coalescence. The latter sex in Diaptomus castor (Jurine), a species
which is found all over Europe, measures from a twelfth to a seventh of an inch in length, the
male not quite attaining the upper limit. But in determining the actual species with which
Mr. Edwin Smith was concerned, we are met with this difficulty. He says that it is ' easily
recognized by its inferior antennae, which are fully as long as the entire body.' It is obvious
that by the inferior antennae he really intends the first, and not the very much shorter second,
pair. But in Diaptomus castor the first antennae are ' unusually short, when reflexed reaching
but slightly beyond the anterior division of the body.' l There is, however, another allied
species, D. gracills (Sars), also found all over Europe, and described from England by Sir John
Lubbock (Lord Avebury) under the name of D. westwoodi, which has the first antennas even
longer than the body. This species, only a sixteenth of an inch long, is probably the one to
which Mr. Smith was really referring.2 It is not a little important that in faunistic lists some
distinctive features of the creatures mentioned should be given, whereby verification of their
names may be made to some extent practicable. In regard to Cyclops quadricornis the two
authorities above quoted do not allude to any specific character. But the Linnean name
quadricornis has been applied to several forms which are now held to be distinct species. Thus,
according to Dr. G. S. Brady, F.R.S., the C. quadricornis of Lilljeborg is the same as the
Monoculus quadricornis rubens of Jurine, and should be called C. strenuus (Fischer), while the
M. q. albidus and the M. q. fuscus of Jurine he considers to be two varieties of the species
C. signatus (Koch).3 On the other hand, Mr. J. D. Scourfield includes quadricornis in the
synonymy of three distinct British species, C. strenuus (Fischer), C. fuscus (Jurine), and C.
albidus (Jurine),* not to mention others which were regarded by Dr. Baird in 1850 as mere
varieties of one generalized type.5 It is not only possible, but practically certain, that several of
these will eventually be found in this county. In C. strenuus and its near allies it may be
noticed that the anterior antennas are ly-jointed. They cannot therefore be confused with
Canthocampus minutus (O. F. Mtlller), in which the first antennas are only 8-jointed. The
hard structure to which Mr. Smith refers, as seen in connexion with the vulvular segment of
the female, was probably the spermatic tube. The genus, be it observed, is properly named
Canthocampus, not Canthocamptus. The species C. furcatus (Baird) has been transferred to
the genus Idya (Philippi), and being a marine species has no claim to our consideration here,
nor does Mr. Smith claim to have found it in local waters. Its range is wonderfully exten-
sive, since it occurs not only on the English coast, but also at New Zealand and in the
Chatham Islands.6
Professor Carr observes in his often quoted paper, ' Among the Entomostraca perhaps the
most interesting form is the fish-parasite, Argulus foliaceus (Linn). This beautiful and delicate
Crustacean I have found in numbers on bream taken from the Trent at Nottingham.7 Here
we are fortunately left in no doubt about the species, since there is but one of the family
known in England. The only doubt is about its place in classification, whether it should be
ranged among the parasitic Copepoda, to which so many fish-devotees belong, or should be
allotted to a special division of the Branchiopoda called Branchiura or gill-tails. As will be
seen from Baird's bibliographical history of the genus,8 these animals have courted the attention
of more than one distinguished naturalist. The celebrated Cuvier kept some alive under
special observation. He noted that the eggs were deposited in two compact straight lines on
1 G. O. Sars, Crustacea of Norway, iv, 85 (1903) ; and Giesbrecht and Schmeil, Das Tierreic6t
Copepoda, pt. i, 88 (1898).
3 Sars, op. cit. p. 92, pi. 63 ; Giesbrecht and Schmeil, op. cit. p. 72.
8 Nat. Hist. Trans. Northumb. etc. vol. xi, pt. i, 71, 73 (1891).
* Journal Quekett Microscopical Club, 533, 535 (1903).
5 British Entomostraca, Ray Soc. pp. 198, 203 (1850).
6 Sars, Zool. Jahrb. vol. xxl. pt. iv. 380 (1905).
7 Trans. Nott. Nat. Soc. for 1902-3, p. 2. 8 Brit. Entomostraca, p. 242.
148
CRUSTACEANS
the sides of the glass vessel in which the mother was kept. This method, reminiscent of
molluscan habits, is strikingly different from that of Copepoda, which normally carry the
extruded eggs in ovisacs attached to their own bodies. Cuvier described also the four pairs of
two-branched feet as serving both for locomotion and respiration, being perpetually in move-
ment, whether the animal were swimming or at rest. One of the remarkable peculiarities of
this species, but not common to the whole family of the Argulidas, is the transformation of
one pair of maxillz into suckers. These give the animal secure adhesion to the fishes, from
which by other organs it derives a bountiful meal. When sufficiently gorged it can loose
hold and disport itself freely in the water. There is no narrow exclusiveness in its attach-
ments, for it has been observed on carp and roach, pike and perch, trout and salmon-trout,
as well as on the humble stickle-back and the tadpole of the frog. The bream is an addition
to the victims on which this sanguinary persecutor battens for the nutriment of its little flat,
greenish, roundabout body.
The Cladocera, which owe their name to their two-branched second antennas, unlike the
Argulidae, are a much diversified order of the Branchiopoda. In place of the two separate
compound eyes and median eye-spot which our Argulus enjoys, they have but one eye, with
or without an eye-spot in attendance. They have a more or less distinct head, and the rest of
the body in general covered by a bivalved sheath. They have from four to six pairs of feet.
They share with many other Entomostraca a privilege highly conducive to the preservation
and distribution of the race. While essentially aquatic animals that cannot live without
water, they can, nevertheless, sow the seed of future generations in defiance of drought.
For example, in January of this present year I conveyed from one county to another a little
earth scooped up from a piece of grassland which was not then, but sometimes is, covered by
a thin stratum of water. Some ordinary drinking water was poured upon this dried mud.
For some weeks it showed no sign of crustacean life, but at length on the agth of the month
I noticed some moving specks, and on the following 4th of February I was able to take out and
dissect a full-grown Daphnia pulex laden with thirty-five well-advanced eggs. Of this vivacious
and abundant order Mr. Pratt's list mentions ' Daphnia pulex. — Ponds and ditches in many
places about Nottingham. D. schiefferi. — Pond at Gamston, near Nottingham. D. reticulata. —
Ponds about Nottingham. D. vetula. — Ditch near Beeston. Chydorus sphfericus. — Ditch near
Beeston. Eurycercus lamellatus. — Old pond at Strelley.' In Mr. Edwin Smith's lecture various
species are mentioned with some account of their peculiarities, but no statement that they had
been observed in Nottinghamshire, although a species of Macrothrix is noted as having been
found elsewhere. This notice is succeeded by the following paragraph : ' One other family
of the Cladocera should be mentioned, if only because it contains Chydorus sphaericus, a very
common species in our stagnant ponds. The .Lynceidae (for so the family is called) may be
recognized by a black spot situated in front of the eye, and looking not much unlike a second
eye, which, however, it is not. The intestine, moreover, makes one complete turn and a half.
To the same family belong Eurycercus lamellatus and Acroperus harpce, both of which occur in
this neighbourhood. The latter is fond of resting on the top of the water, moored by its
antennae to a bit of weed, or a cluster of them will collect round some floating leaf or sprig,
and lie motionless in the warm sunshine as if asleep.' From references in other parts of the
essay it is clear that the expression ' this neighbourhood ' relates to Nottingham.
There is no reason whatever for doubting that the species recorded in the above quoted
lists occur in this county. It would rather be a marvel if they did not. But some comment
may be offered on their names and distinctive characters. In the family Daphniidae the second
antennae have the dorsal branch four-jointed, the ventral one three-jointed ; of the five pairs
of feet, the last is remote from the others, and the intestine is not convoluted. The typical
species, Daphnia pulex (de Geer), is extremely common. It is also very mutable, so that a
medley of specific, subspecific, and varietal names has grown round it. D. schtefferi (Baird) is
now identified with the earlier D, magna (Straus), and earns its specific name by attaining a
much more considerable size than its commoner relation, the female becoming about a sixth of
an inch long as contrasted with a tenth of an inch measured by the other species, in each case
the terminal spur not included.1 The D. reticulata of Baird is now known as Ceriodaphnia
reticulata (Jurine), the genus being distinguished from Daphnia by having the first antennae of
the female movable, and by the hexagonal or pentagonal pattern of the reticulation on its
shell. It must, however, be understood that the name as used by Baird is considered now to
cover not only three varieties of Jurine's species, but two other species in addition, namely,
1 Brady, in Nat. Hist. Trans. Northumberland, etc., vol. xiii, pt. ii, pp. 222, 242 (1898).
149
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
C. mega/ops (Sars) and C. quadrangula (O. F. Mtlller).1 Similarly, Daphnia vetula (Baird)
includes the two species Simocephalus vetulus (O. F. Mdller) and S. exspinosus (Koch), the
former ' one of the commonest of the British Cladocera,' the latter ' a fairly common species
in the south and east of England, but not yet recorded from the north or from Scotland. ' In
these there is no spiny prolongation of the shell such as occurs in Daphnia, and the head is
obtuse with a beak but little projecting. In 1903 Dr. A. M. Norman, F.R.S., pointed out
that the generic name Simocephalus (SchOdler) was pre-occupied, and changed it to Simosa.
Some specimens sent me by Professor Carr, ' which when alive were pea-green in colour,' and
which ' were excessively abundant among the water weeds in the canal at Cossall, Notts,'
proved on examination to be Simosa vetula. The three remaining species — Eurycercus lamellatus
(O. F. Mailer), Acroperus harpa (Baird), and Chydorus sphaericus (O. F. Mailer) — belong to a
family which has been not unfrequently, but not properly, named Lynceidcs. Correctly, it
should be named Chydoridae from its premier genus Chydorus (Leach). Here both branches
of the second antennae are three-jointed, there are five or six pairs of feet equally spaced, and
the intestine forms almost a double convolution. By these characters its numerous genera are
distinguishable from those of the Daphniida:. The Eurycercus, though like our Cladocera in
general, small enough in itself, is quite a monster compared with the other two species. It is
also lethargic in its habits, in contrast to the little spherical Chydorus, which is ever on the
move. The Acroperus is distinguished from Chydorus by its harp-shaped shell, the strings of the
harp being represented by the obliquely longitudinal ribbing of the transparent carapace.
Lastly, the Ostracoda demand a brief notice. Concerning these Mr. Edwin Smith says,
' The species most common in the neighbourhood of Nottingham are Cypris vidua, C. minuta,
C. aurantia. If you search carefully the surface of gravel in your aquarium you may chance
to see a little oblong horny speck making its way by fitful jerks. This will probably turn out
to be a rather large member of the same family, named Candona reptans. It has a comical
habit of creeping in preference to swimming. I have found it about here in meadow drains,
and have successfully bred it in my aquarium from season to season.' s Mr. Pratt's list
contains ' Cypris bistriata — Pond at Gamston and ditch near Beeston.' This group differs
from the Cladocera in many ways, but strikingly in external form, inasmuch as the bivalved
shell or carapace makes no pretence of showing a distinct head. The body within the valves
shows little or no segmentation. The appendages, including the two pairs of antennae and the
mouth-organs, are limited to seven pairs, and do not always reach that number.
According to the latest available authorities the four species mentioned by Mr. E. Smith
should now respectively be called Pionocypris vidua (O. F. Mtlller),4 Cyclocypris lavis (O. F.
Muller),6 Cyprinotus incongruens (Ramdohr),' and Erpetocypris reptans (Baird).7 Mr. Pratt's
Cypris bistriata is presumably C. bistrigata (Jurine), and, if so, may be identical with Ilyocypris
gibba (Ramdohr)8 or with Ilyocypris bradyi (G. O. Sars).9 All these species belong to the section
called Podocopa, in which the second antennae are simple, subpediform, geniculate, furnished
with terminal curved spines called ungues, and the first maxillae have a branchial appendage.
The family to which these species all alike belong is called Cyprididae. Therein only the last
two pairs of limbs are pediform, ' the preceding pair small and maxilliform in female, larger
and modified for grasping in male ; furnished with a branchial appendage,' the caudal append-
ages are ' long, narrow, linear, terminating in ungues,' or else ' minute, consisting of setiform
processes, which run out to a very fine extremity.' 10 From such names as Erpetocypris, the
creeping Cypris, and Ilyocypris, the Cypris of the mud, something may be judged as to the
sluggish habits which some of these creatures have contracted. They are all very common in
England, with one very remarkable limitation to this quality of abundance. It is not without
reason that Pionocypris vidua is specifically called ' the widow,' for Professor G. O. Sars in
1889, when defining the genus (then called Cypridopsis), gives as one of the characters,
' propagation exclusively parthenogenetical.' u Nevertheless, so unnatural an exclusiveness may
perhaps be doubted, for in the neighbouring genus Cypris, at one time supposed to share this
singular singleness of sex, males of various species, such as C. incongruens, have now been
repeatedly found. Yet Brady and Norman say, ' As far as we know the curious fact remains
1 Scourfield, in Journ. Quekelt Microscopical Club, ser. 2, viii, 436 (1903).
* Ibid. p. 435. 8 The Midland Naturalist, i, 17.
* Brady and Norman, Trans. Roy. DubRn Soc. ser. 2, v, 726 (1896). 6 Ibid. p. 718.
8 Sars, Crustacean Fauna of Central Asia, pt. iii, p. 28 (1903).
7 Brady and Norman, Trans. Roy. Dublin Soc. ser. 2, iv, p. 84 (1889).
8 Ibid. p. 107. » Op. cit. v, 728.
1° Ibid. p. 624. 11 Ibid. p. 725.
CRUSTACEANS
that no representatives of that sex have been observed in northern or western Europe north of
Spain.' l
While much remains to be done for the Crustacea of Nottinghamshire, enough has been
done already by a few workers to show that the county is, as might have been expected, ready
to yield a rich harvest to those who have time to study its carcinology. The comparative
neglect of this particular branch of natural history investigation is scarcely surprising, since in
quite recent years a history of the county could claim to discuss its flora and fauna, while
completely ignoring the whole zoology of invertebrate animals. The ' water-flea ' and the
' wood-louse ' need not complain of indifference and neglect, when spiders and flies, ants and
grasshoppers, are treated as the mere material for fables, and the great armies of beetles and
bees and butterflies are left out of account, as though they had no essential part in the life and
economy of the globe, and contributed nothing to the beauty and the marvel of man's
surroundings.
1 Op. cit. p. 721.
FISHES
In the twenty-sixth song of Michael Drayton's poem, the Poly-
olbion, published in 1622, reference is made to the fishes then known to
occur in the Trent near Nottingham. This enumeration constitutes, as
far as I can learn, the earliest record of Nottinghamshire fishes, and in spite
of the enormous growth of the city since Drayton wrote, and the pour-
ing into the river of large volumes of foul water from the numerous
dyeing, bleaching, tanning and other works, as well as the effluent from
the sewage farm, the fish fauna seems to have undergone comparatively
little change during the interval of 280 years since the publication of
the Polyolbion, and I am only able to add eight species to Drayton's
list, viz. the miller's thumb, three-spined and ten-spined sticklebacks,
burbot, rudd, white bream, spined loach and shad.
TELEOSTEANS
ACANTHOPTERYGII
1. Perch. Perca fluv iatilis, Linn.
Very common in all parts of the Trent
and attaining a large size, specimens weigh-
ing from 3 to 3^ Ib. being frequently taken.
2. Ruffe. Acerlna cernua, Linn.
One of the commonest fishes in the Trent.
3. Miller's Thumb. Coitus gobio, Linn.
Common in the Trent and its tributary
streams.
ANACANTHINI
4. Burbot. Lota vulgarly Cuv.
This fish, the freshwater representative of
the cod family, occurs in the Trent, but not
commonly. A specimen taken at Wilford
weighed 4^ Ib.
5. Flounder. Pleurone ctes fesus, Linn.
Common in the Trent below Newark, but
occasionally makes its way higher up the
stream, even as far as Colwick Weir, close to
Nottingham.
HEMIBRANCHII
6. Three-spined Stickleback. Gasterosteus
acu/eatus, Linn.
Very common everywhere in rivers, streams
and ponds.
7. Ten-spined Stickleback. Gasterosteus pun-
gitius, Linn.
Common in places, as in the streams and
ditches in the Nottingham and Lenton
meadows, but much less so than the last.
HAPLOMI
8. Pike. Esox /ucius, Linn.
Common in rivers, canals and lakes every-
where.
OSTARIOPHYSI
9. Carp. Cyprinus carpio, Linn.
Occurs, but is not common, in the Trent,
preferring ponds and still waters, in which
situations it is fairly common.
10. Barbel. Barbus vu/garis, Flem.
Common in deep waters all along the
course of the Trent, both above and below
Nottingham. Examples up to 10 Ib. in
weight are frequently taken, and one brought
to me a few years ago scaled loj Ib.
11. Gudgeon. Gobio fluviatilis^ Flem.
Common.
12. Roach. Leuciscus ruti/us, Linn.
Abundant in rivers and canals. The finest
Nottingham specimen I have handled weighed
i Ib. io£ oz.
152
FISHES
13. Chub. Leuciscus cephalus, Linn.
Very common in the Trent ; specimens
weighing from 5 to 6 Ib. are not infrequently
caught.
14. Dace. Leuciscus vulgaris, Flem.
Very common in the Trent.
15. Rudd. Leuciscus erythrophthalmus, Flem.
Occurs in the Trent, but is not common.
1 6. Minnow. Leuciscus phoxinus, Flem.
Common in the Trent and tributary
streams.
17. Tench. Tinea vulgaris, Cuv.
Is occasionally taken in the Trent, and is
fairly common in ponds and still waters.
1 8. Bream. Abramis brama, Linn.
Very common in the Trent ; a specimen
in the Nottingham Museum weighed 6f Ib.
in the flesh.
19. White or Silver Bream. Abramis blicca,
Bloch.
Common in the Trent and in the Grantham
Canal.
20. Bleak. Alburnus lucidus, Hackel.
This species is known locally as the whit-
ling, and is a common Trent fish. A speci-
men taken from the river at Radcliffe-on-
Trent a few years ago weighed 5^ oz.
21. Loach. Nemachilus barbatula, Linn.
A common Trent fish.
22. Spined Loach. Cobitis t&nia, Linn.
'River Trent' (Berkenhout, Synopsis, p. 79).
' Has been recorded from the Trent near
Nottingham ' (Day, British Fishes, ii. 202).
Mr. W. Rose has taken it commonly in a
pool by the Trent near Trent Bridge, Not-
tingham.
MALACOPTERYGII
23. Salmon. Salmo salar, Linn.
Occurs every year in many parts of the
Trent, both above and below Nottingham,
but not very commonly.
24. Trout. Salmo trutta, Linn, (including
S. fario, Linn.).
Scarce in the Trent, but occurs about the
spots where the small trout streams — in which
it is common — enter the river. Some of our
artificial lakes and some trout streams are
stocked with the variety known as the Loch
Leven trout.
25. Grayling. Thymallus vexH/ifer, Linn.
This elegant fish was within twenty years
ago fairly common in one or two places in
the Trent near Nottingham, but is now very
scarce. The only local specimen in the
Nottingham Museum was taken from the
Trent in Beeston meadows about 1895 ; it
is just over 10 inches in length. Two other
specimens, of 4 or 5 oz. weight each, were
caught in 1896.
[The Smelt, Osmerus eperlanus, Linn., is
mentioned by Drayton as one of his ' thirty
fishes of Trent,' but although it is not un-
likely that it may ascend the Trent into
Nottinghamshire, I have no record of its
actual occurrence.]
26. Shad. Clupea a/osa, Linn.
An example was taken in the Trent at
South Clifton some years ago, and a second
captured at South Muskham near Newark in
1896 is preserved in an inn at Newark.
APODES
27. Eel. Anguilla vu/garis, Turt.
Very common in rivers and canals, attain-
ing a very large size. It descends to the sea
to breed, spawning in deep water, where the
eggs give rise to the remarkable little fish
known as Leptocephalus brmirastris, Pennant,
a larval form, whose connection with the eel
was until lately unsuspected. The Lepto-
cephali undergo a metamorphosis, the result
being the little ' elvers ' which make their
way in multitudes up the rivers in which the
adult condition is attained.
GANOIDEI
28. Sturgeon. Aciptnser sturio, Linn.
Very rare in the Trent, and has not, I
believe, been seen near Nottingham for many
years. The last one that I can hear of was
taken at Clifton, some few miles above the
city. This is a curious coincidence, as there
is an old popular belief that the presence of
one of these fish in the Trent above Notting-
ham presages the death of some member of
the ancient Clifton family, whose mansion
stands on the right bank of the river (Lowe,
in Black's Guide to Nottinghamshire). On
IO June, 1884, a fine sturgeon was captured
at Muskham near Newark in the salmon nets ;
it was 8 feet long and weighed 16 stone (Field,
14 June, 1884). Another specimen was
captured in the Trent at Muskham Bridge
near Newark in June, 1902.
153
20
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
CYCLOSTOMES
29. Lamprey. Petromyzon mannus, Linn.
Occurs in the Trent, but not commonly ;
a fine specimen caught in the river at Fisker-
ton about 1897 is now in the Nottingham
Museum.
30. Lampern. Petromyzon fluviatllh, Linn.
Abundant in the Trent, especially about
Colwick, Beeston, Newark and Averham
Weirs where great quantities used to be taken
and sent to Grimsby for bait for sea-fishing.
I have seen it in considerable numbers in the
Rainworth Water near Mansfield.
154
REPTILES
AND BATRACHIANS
The list of reptiles and batrachians is a very meagre one, only the
commonest species being found in Nottinghamshire, and even of these
the slow-worm and viper are now very rare. Sterland's assertion (in
White's Worksop, the Dukery, and Sherwood Forest] that the sand lizard
(Lacerta agilis) ' may be seen occasionally ' in Sherwood Forest is doubt-
less an error, and I have hitherto searched in vain for the palmated newt
(Molge palmata).
REPTILES
LACERTILIA
1. Common Lizard. Lacerta vivipara, Jacq.
Formerly common in Nottingham Park, on
the forest and other sandy gorse covered com-
mons about the city ; but the absorption of
most of its former haunts within the ever-
extending area covered by bricks and mortar
has almost exterminated the lizard in this
neighbourhood. It is still however to be
met with in considerable numbers on Bulwell
Forest, where the writer recently saw five
specimens during a morning stroll across the
forest. It was also seen last summer (1902)
in an enclosed part of the old Nottingham
Forest within the city boundary.
2. Slow-worm or Blind-worm. Anguh fra-
gi/is, Linn.
At one time frequent in Sherwood Forest,
according to Sterland. Not often seen now,
but has been taken at Gedling, Lambley and
elsewhere.
OPHIDIA
3. Common or Ringed Snake. Tropidonotw
natrix, Linn.
Fairly common and generally distributed
throughout the county.
4. Viper or Adder. Fipera berus, Linn.
Formerly common in Sherwood Forest,
according to Sterland, but now rare. Mr. J.
Whitaker reports it as occurring very occa-
sionally about Rainworth ; one killed on the
carriage drive there in 1900 was nearly two
feet long. I have heard also of specimens
captured at Oxton and in Newstead Park.
BATRACHIANS
ECAUDATA
1. Common Frog. Rana temporaria, Linn.
2. Common Toad. Bufo vulgarity Laur.
Great
Laur.
CAUDATA
Crested Newt. Molge cristata,
Both of the above are abundant in the
county.
4. Common Newt. Molge vutgaris, Linn.
Both common and generally distributed in
the county, the latter being much the more
abundant.
ADDENDA
Since the above was printed the following records have been received : — Common Lizard :
Seen by the writer 4 September, 1903, in a gravel pit on the Barrow Hills, Everton ; reported
by Mr. Houghton as common in the Worksop district. Slow-worm : Also occurs in the
Worksop district, according to Mr. Houghton. A large specimen seen by the Rev. A.
Thornley in the summer of 1903 in quarry behind Creswell Crags. Viper: A very fine
example, measuring two feet in length, captured in Sherwood Forest near Edwinstowe in
Nov. 1904, has been preserved by Mr. Houghton, who has seen this species also at Shireoaks.
155
BIRDS
Being an inland county, Nottinghamshire cannot be expected to
furnish as extensive a list of birds as one which possesses a coast-line,
however small. Nevertheless the following notes will show that it can
boast of a rich and varied avifauna, which will compare favourably
with that of any other inland county in England.
The extreme northern part of the county lies very low and is drained
by dykes : here the redshank and snipe nest. The forest land to the
south of this covers about 100,000 acres, and is some eighteen miles long
by seven or eight wide ; a large portion has been converted into farms,
but there still remains a considerable area of ancient woodland, largely
consisting of fine old oaks, with a sprinkling of birch and an undergrowth
of bracken. Many hundreds of jackdaws nest in the hollow trunks of
these grand old trees. In several of the great estates comprised within
this region — Clumber, Welbeck, Thoresby and RufFord — are large lakes
covered in winter with waterfowl of many species, which being most care-
fully protected find here a safe and quiet home with abundance of food.
It is no uncommon sight to see over 20 goosanders at one time, and at
Thoresby thirty or forty pairs of tufted ducks remain in the spring to breed.
Coming towards the middle of the county there is in RufFord and
Mansfield Forests a large stretch of heather, some 4,000 acres in extent,
with here and there patches of fir-trees ; here live the last of the
Nottinghamshire black-game, now only a small remnant, but for size
and beauty of plumage equal to any in Great Britain. Rainworth
waters lie to the south of this tract of heather, and here the tufted
duck has nested in numbers since at least as far back as 1820—30. From
these waters, consisting of seven or eight ponds of about 50 acres in
total area, they gradually spread over the other waters in the county, and
now many scores of pairs breed on other properties. The teal, shoveler
and wild duck also nest on these lakelets.
South of Rainworth are the fine estates of Newstead, Sherwood
Lodge, and Bestwood and Annesley Parks, on all of which are many
plantations of fir and hardwood trees, and these being most carefully
protected form quiet nesting places for many species of birds. In all
there are about 26,000 acres of woods in Notts — not a large area, but a
fair extent for an agricultural county.
About Nottingham, and thence to the southern boundary of the
county, we find much more grass ; there are not so many plantations, but
still we find some woods of fair size. This part of the county is rich in
warblers and finches, and is also a fair game district, though not to be
compared in this latter respect with the forest part, where much more
corn and turnips are grown.
An inland county is always at a disadvantage compared with one
possessing a sea-coast, but rivers and streams, especially large ones, offer
156
BIRDS
a great inducement to sea-birds and waterfowl to follow their course
inland far from their natural home. Nottinghamshire is fortunate in
having such a fine river as the Trent, which runs through the county
from south-west to north-east and forms a natural highway from the
sea. There are numerous other streams, the most important being the
Idle, which drains the northern parts of Notts ; there are also several
canals. These make the county very attractive to birds of aquatic habits.
We have no big hills, though a few rise to about 600 feet ; on one hill
near Rainworth a small trip of dotterel often stay for a few days on their
way north to nest ; they were last seen in April 1901, when they num-
bered about sixteen.
No place in Nottinghamshire has a larger or more varied avifauna
than Rainworth, and it may be of interest to enumerate the birds that
have been seen within a radius of one mile around Rainworth Lodge :
they number 155 species, and are' as follows : —
Osprey
Peregrine Falcon
Hobby
Merlin
Kestrel
Sparrow Hawk
Common Buzzard
Rough-legged Buzzard
Hen Harrier
Montagu's Harrier
Barn Owl
Tawny Owl
Long-eared Owl
Short-eared Owl
Great Grey Shrike
Red-backed Shrike
Spotted Flycatcher
Pied Flycatcher
Missel Thrush
Song Thrush
Fieldfare
Redwing
Blackbird
Ring Ousel
Hedge Sparrow
Redbreast
Redstart
Stonechat
Whinchat
Wheatear
Reed Warbler
Sedge Warbler
Grasshopper Warbler
Nightingale
Blackcap
Garden Warbler
Whitethroat
Lesser Whitethroat
Wood Warbler
Willow Warbler
157
Chiffchaff
Great Spotted
Bittern
Wren
Woodpecker
Water Rail
Goldcrest
Lesser Spotted
Land Rail
Tree Creeper
Woodpecker
Moorhen
Great Tit
Wryneck
Coot
Blue Tit
Cuckoo
Whooper Swan
Coal Tit
Kingfisher
Bewick's Swan
Marsh Tit
Swallow
Mute Swan
Long tailed Tit
House Martin
Grey Lag Goose
Pied Wagtail
Sand Martin
Brent
White Wagtail
Swift
Canada Goose
Grey Wagtail
Nightjar
Wild Duck
Yellow Wagtail
Ring Dove
Gad wall
Tree Pipit
Stock Dove
Shoveler
Meadow Pipit
Turtle Dove
Wigeon
Sky Lark
Pheasant
Teal
Corn Bunting
Black Grouse
Garganey
Reed Bunting
Pallas's Sand Grouse
Pochard
Yellow Hammer
Partridge
Scaup
Chaffinch
Red-legged Partridge
Tufted Duck
Brambling
Quail
Golden-eye
Goldfinch
Grey Plover
Scoter
Siskin
Golden Plover
Smew
Linnet
Lapwing
Red-breasted
Twite
Ringed Plover
Merganser
Lesser Redpole
Dotterel
Goosander
Tree Sparrow
Greenshank
Great Crested Grebe
House Sparrow
Redshank
Sclavonian Grebe
Greenfinch
Green Sandpiper
Little Grebe
Hawfinch
Common Sandpiper
Gannet
Bullfinch
Knot
Common Tern
Crossbill
Dunlin
Black Tern
Starling
Grey Phalarope
Black-headed Gull
Carrion Crow
Woodcock
Kittiwake
Hooded Crow
Common Snipe
Common Gull
Rook
Jack Snipe
Herring Gull
Jackdaw
Curlew
Lesser Black-backed
Magpie
Whimbrel
Gull
Jay
Spoonbill
Great Black-backed
Green Woodpecker
Heron
Gull
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
There are two duck-traps in the county, one at Park Hall and the
other in Annesley Park. They are made by cutting a narrow canal
through an island and covering it over with wire netting ; at each end is
a door which can be raised or lowered at pleasure. The trap is baited
with corn. The ducks swim in to feed, and when a sufficient number
have entered the doors at the ends are lowered by means of a wire
pulled by the fowler, who is concealed in a hut from which he can get
a clear view of the trap without being seen by the wildfowl on the
water. The captives are left until night, when the other ducks have left
the pond, and are then caught, the doors raised, corn spread, and the trap
is again ready for next day. This mode of capture is more effective
than shooting, for if wildfowl are shot at often they leave the lake, but
when taken in a trap the rest are not disturbed and attract others.
At Park Hall, where the lake is in front of the house, hundreds of
wildfowl may be seen dotted all over the water, and sitting or feeding on
the banks by scores ; parties of ducks are continually coming and going,
and ten or a dozen herons may be seen at one time, some often standing
on the top of the trap, the sides of which are hidden by willows and
other shrubs. Cattle and other animals are kept away by an iron
fence, and no gun is fired anywhere near. There is no more delight-
ful occupation for a naturalist than to sit in the library window with
a good pair of glasses watching the wildfowl — six or seven or even
more species — some asleep, others feeding or chasing one another over
the glassy surface of the lake, and parties of pochards and tufted ducks
busy diving. When lit up by a bright winter sun the scene is one to be
remembered. The ducks begin to arrive in numbers about the end of
September and remain until the spring, when they depart to their nesting
quarters. As many as 400 have been taken in a winter on this piece of
water, and I have many times seen a thousand or more wildfowl on and
about the lake at one time.
In compiling the following list all doubtful occurrences have been
most carefully excluded, and only those enumerated which have a real
claim to be considered Nottinghamshire birds.
1. Missel Thrush. Turdus viscivorus, Linn, birds of this species singing in the plantations
This fine thrush is distributed over the round the house at one time ' the volume of
county in fair numbers, and is very abundant sound was wonderful,
at Rainworth. In August, when they flock 3. Redwing. Turdus iliacus, Linn.
together, as many as 1 15 have been seen to A fajr number of thisspecies visits us every
fly into a small plantation in the deer park to autumn and wj but k is most numerous
roost. It is usually met with in pairs in m thg of the c where grass fidds
spring, and I have found its nest in a small and b; hed occur . thfe bird suffers much
fir within 2 feet 6 inches of the ground. in severe winters>
2. Song Thrush. Turdus musicus, Linn. 4. Fieldfare. Turdus pi/arts, Linn.
Very common and distributed over the Much commoner than the last named bird,
county in spring and summer ; many leave some years occurring in very large flocks,
in autumn ; it frequents small plantations. The earliest date at which I have ever seen
In March 1901 Mr. Aplin, when staying at this bird was on 12 September 1874, and
Rainworth, was certain he heard over 100 the latest the third week in May 1900.
158
BIRDS
5. Blackbird. Turdus merit/a, Linn.
Very common. This bird stands severe
weather better than the thrush or redwing.
6. Ring Ouzel. Turdus torquatus, Linn.
Seen occasionally in the spring and autumn,
more particularly the latter time.
7. Wheatear. Saxicola oenanthe (Linn.)
Found in small numbers in suitable places.
It nests on Ratcher Hill in Mansfield Forest,
where several pairs arrive in March, using
rabbit holes in which to lay their eggs ; a
fair number rest in big fields on their way
south in autumn.
8. Whinchat. Pratincola rubetra (Linn.)
Very common all over the county and is
partial to the hedges by the roadside. It is pro-
bable that there are two forms of this bird,
some of the males being larger and brighter
and having more white on their heads than
others.
9. Stonechat. Pratincola rubicola (Linn.)
Not at all a common bird in Notts ; found
here and there in suitable places, and at Rain-
worth it is seen almost as often in winter as
in summer. A pair or two breed in Mans-
field Forest.
10. Redstart. Ruticilla phcenicurus (Linn.)
Lightly distributed in most parts ; it is fond
of oak woods and frequents the forest where
it can find old hollow oaks for nesting ; in
younger woods it nests under the dead leaves
on the ground and in faggot heaps. I have
them breeding at Rainworth in boxes put up
in the plantations.
n. Black Redstart. Ruticilla titys (Scopoli)
Rare. A male was shot near Nottingham
in May 1846, one in December 1857, and
another on the old Nottingham racecourse
in 1870.
12. Redbreast. Erithacus rubecula (Linn.)
A very common resident, drawing near
houses and gardens in autumn and winter
and going further afield to nest in spring. Its
eggs are rarely taken, but the species does not
increase ; one of our early nesting birds.
13. Nightingale. Daulias luscinia (Linn.)
The old saying that this bird never went
north of the Trent has been proved to be
wrong, for it is fairly plentiful in the southern
parts of the county, and a few pairs nest here
and there in the north portion.
14. Whitethroat. Sylvia cinerea (Bechstein)
A very common spring visitor and frequents
hedges ; it is often seen taking short upward
flights and singing at the same time. I have
a white variety shot near Nottingham.
15. Lesser Whitethroat. Sylvia curruca
(Linn.)
Much less common and more local than
the last-named species, and often overlooked
by those who do not know its song. It
sings in trees of a good height. There are
always a pair or two nesting at Rainworth in
garden plantations.
1 6. Blackcap. Sylvia atricapilla (Linn.)
Only fairly common in localities which
suit it ; one of our finest songsters. I have
often seen a male sitting on the nest.
17. Garden Warbler. Sylvia hortensis (Bech-
stein)
More numerous in some years than in
others, and commoner in the southern part of
the county.
1 8. Goldcrest. Regulus cristatui, Koch
Found nesting in fir plantations, and occurs
in greater numbers in the northern and middle
parts of the county. It has a very pleasing
little song in spring.
19. Firecrest. Regulus ignicapillus (Brehm)
A rare visitor ; one was shot by Mr.
Caborn in Nottingham Meadows in 1850,
and another by Daws, the bird-stuffer of
Mansfield, in his garden about 1878. This
bird no doubt is often overlooked and mis-
taken for one of the last species, for owing to
its quick movements it is not easy, even for a
keen observer, to see the white eye-line.
20. Chiffchaff. Phylloscopus rufus (Bechstein)
Local, and is one of our earliest spring
visitors. I shot one at Rainworth on 28
February 1882 ; this may have been one that
had stayed over the winter, which it has been
known to do on several occasions.
21. Willow Warbler. Phylloscopus trochilus
(Linn.)
This pretty little warbler is much more
common in all parts of the county than the
last named bird, and its song is heard on all
sides in April, May and June. It is fond of
young larch plantations.
22. Wood Warbler. Phylloscopus sibilatrix
(Bechstein)
A very local bird, but found in fair num-
bers in the great oak woods near Rainworth,
also at Annesley and in Sherwood Forest.
It has a very striking song which once heard
can never be mistaken. The nest of this
159
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
bird is very difficult to find ; it is lined with
grass, not hair, as most of the natural history
books tell us. There are generally about thirty
pairs nesting in Harlow Wood, which is about
800 acres in extent.
23. Reed Warbler. dcrocephalus streperus
(Vieillot)
Not uncommon in reed beds on the side of
the Trent, where it breeds. It was once
heard on the side of the lake at Rainworth.
24. Sedge Warbler. Acrocepbalus phragmitis
(Bechstein)
Fairly common in suitable localities; as it
sings when quite dark at night it is often mis-
taken for a nightingale by the villagers in
these parts.
25. Grasshopper Warbler. Locustella neevla
(Boddaert)
A spring visitant and very local ; but
although it is found in certain places one
year, it may not occur again there for some
time. It is generally found near water, but
has been seen over a mile away nesting in
clover fields. I have a pretty variety with
partly white flights shot near Mansfield in
1892. This bird has not nested at Rain-
worth since 1887, when there were three
pairs.
26. Hedge Sparrow. Accentor modularis
(Linn.)
Distributed all over the county, but not in
such great numbers as formerly.
27. Dipper. Cine/us aquaticus, Bechstein.
Two or three have been shot or seen on
the stream at Perlthorpe, Thoresby. Mr.
Edward Walter shot one and saw another on
the stream near Papplewick in 1 88 1, and I
saw one by the waterfall at Lamb Close in
1898. Both were specimens of the chestnut
breasted dipper.
28. Black-bellied Dipper. Cine/us melano-
gaster, Brehm.
The only specimen obtained in Notting-
hamshire was shot near Southwell about 1873.
29. Bearded Tit or Reedling. Panurus biar-
micus (Linn.)
The late Mr. Percy of Beeston shot a bird
of this species in a willow-bed near Toton
in Notts, and had it in his collection ; it was
alone at the time. As far as I know this is
the only county specimen.
30. Long-Tailed Tit. Acredula caudata
(Linn.)
Fairly common, and is more in evidence
in winter, when it is seen in small and large
parties. This bird is fond of nesting near the
same place year after year.
31. Great Tit. Parus major, Linn.
Well distributed all over the county ; a
bird of many notes. It is rather too fond of
bees.
32. Coal Tit. Parus ater, Linn.
Common, but not so numerous as the last
species and more retiring.
33. Marsh Tit. Parus palustris, Linn.
The rarest of the five commoner tits in
Notts.
34. Blue Tit. Parus cceruleus, Linn.
Common all over the county ; in winter it
is seen in woods in companies, associated with
two or three of the other species of tit.
35. Nuthatch. Sitta casia, Wolf.
Very local and nowhere common ; nests in
Thoresby Park and at Wollaton ; it has also
been seen at Rufford and in the south of the
county.
36. Wren. Troglodytes parvu/us, Koch.
A very common resident, found in woods,
gardens and hedgerows all over the county ;
it is one of the few birds that sing here in
winter.
Certhia fami/iaris, Linn,
in woods, but is nowhere
comes nearer houses in
has been known to nest
a greenhouse attached to
a summer-house, and on
a flower-box close to my
most interesting little bird
37. Tree Creeper.
This bird is seen
common. It often
breeding time, and
under the lead in
this house, also in
another occasion in
front door. It is a
and very quiet.
38. Pied Wagtail. Motacilla lugubris, Tem-
minck.
This pretty bird is found in greater num-
bers in spring and summer. It sometimes
stays through the winter and may then often
be seen where sheep are feeding. I once saw
a nest with eggs in a turnip field close under
the side of a large turnip.
39. White Wagtail. Motacilla alba, Linn.
Occurs from time to time, but it is rare.
Two or three have been seen near Ollerton
and also at Rainworth, but it is probably often
overlooked.
40. Grey Wagtail. Motacilla melanope, Pallas.
Far from common ; it is seen in autumn
and early spring. On 2O October 1897 I
1 60
BIRDS
saw one of these beautiful birds running on
the roof of my house ; it was searching for
insects, and the contrast of its bright colours
against the slates was a pretty sight.
41. Blue-headed Yellow Wagtail. Mota-
cilla flava, Linn.
Two of these birds were killed at one shot
on the side of the stream at Ollerton, by Hibbs
the naturalist, on 7 June 1892.
42. Yellow Wagtail. Motacilla ra'ii (Bona-
parte)
This beautiful bird arrives in April in
numbers in suitable places ; it is plentiful in
the Trent valley. Nests have been found
several times in fields of tares, but they are
very hard to locate.
43. Tree Pipit. Anthus trivia/is (Linn.)
A regular spring migrant, and is found in
numbers in the big woods in north Notts.
44. Meadow Pipit. Anthus prattnsis (Linn.)
Plentiful, and is often seen in sheep-pens
in turnip fields. I saw a white specimen in
September 1888, and a cream-coloured one
was shot near Southwell.
45. Golden Oriole. Orio/us galtu/a, Linn.
The late Mr. Lowe of Highfield House
saw one of these beautiful birds in his grounds
several times in 1863.
46. Great Grey Shrike. Lanius excubitor,
Linn.
A rare winter visitor, but seen from time
to time. I shot one when partridge driving
at Park Hall in 1877 ; and on 13 March
1901, when Mr. Aplin and I were driving
over the forest, we saw one near the Clip-
stone Road and had a good opportunity of
watching it. I have two others in my col-
lection shot near Nottingham ; all three are
the form with one bar (L. major, Pallas's
shrike).
47. Red-backed Shrike. Lanius collurioy Linn.
A regular visitor to the southern parts of
the county, but it is nowhere common ; not
so plentiful in the northern parts. A pair
nested in a garden at Blidworth in 1897, and
the year before, probably the same ones, in a
lane near that village.
48. Woodchat Shrike. Lanius pomeranus,
Sparrman.
This rare bird has occurred once in Not-
tinghamshire, when a male was shot in May
1859 in Sherwood Forest near 'The Buck
Gates,' Thoresby Park, by Mr. H. Wells.
49. Waxwing. Ampelis garrulus, Linn.
Now and again this handsome bird has oc-
curred. The late Captain Hall shot one at
Park Hall a good many years ago ; a few
have been obtained in the northern parts of
the county, several at Ossington in 1871,
and I saw one in the valley near Rainworth
in March 1883.
50. Pied Flycatcher. Muscicapa atricapilla,
Linn.
A rare visitor. It is known to have nested
twice in the county, once in Birkland, and in
a hollow apple tree at Ramsdale in 1875.
Other occurrences are : one shot at Oxton,
two seen near Rainworth, one at Newstead
in May 1887, and also at Newark, Wellow
and Ollerton.
51. Spotted Flycatcher. Muscicapa grisola,
Linn.
A common spring visitor and generally the
last to come. In 1902 it did not arrive till
23 May, which is the latest date I have ever
known ; in 1901 it was almost as late, viz.
22 May, but it started to nest at once and
had a nest and one egg in it on the 27th.
This migrant is so conspicuous in its habits
that its arrival is at once noticed.
52. Swallow. Hirundo rustica, Linn.
This charming summer bird arrives gener-
ally about 12 April and in varying numbers
all over the county. Some seasons it is more
numerous than in others. Several white, pied
and cream-coloured varieties have been shot.
53. House Martin. Chelidon urbica (Linn.)
Not nearly so plentiful as the last species
but fairly common, and is a useful bird ; the
quantity of flies consumed by a pair during
their visit to us must be enormous.
54. Sand Martin. Cotile riparia (Linn.)
Rather local, and numerous where there
are suitable nesting places ; there are several
large 'sand-martinries' in different parts of the
county. It breeds on the side of the Trent.
I have several varieties shot in Nottingham-
shire.
55. Greenfinch. Ligurinus chlorls (Linn.)
Very common ; it is fond of hedgerows,
and stubbles in autumn. I have a beautiful
variety with pale yellow wings, and another
of a cream colour ; both were shot near Not-
tingham.
56. Hawfinch. Coccothraustes vulgarly Pallas.
This bird has increased very much in late
years all over the county. I first came across
161
21
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
it in 1870, when I saw some feeding on the
peas in the garden at Ramsdale, and two or
three were shot ; the man who preserved
them said they were the first he had had.
This bird nests in apple, oak and thorn trees
in preference to others, and is very shy and
retiring. I have a beautiful specimen showing
a great deal of white on its head, back and
breast, which was shot in 1894 at Berry Hill
near Mansfield.
57. Goldfinch. Carduelis e/egans, Stephens.
I am sorry to say this beautiful finch is now
rare ; high farming and clap-nets have told
their tale. It still breeds in suitable places, and
a few are seen in the autumn ; it has nested
in my kitchen garden.
58. Siskin. Carduelis spintu (Linn.)
This pretty little bird comes to us in
autumn and leaves early in the spring. It is
very fond of feeding on the seeds of the
alder and birch. Some winters hardly one is
seen at Rainworth, and again in others there
are a good many.
59. House Sparrow. Passer domesticus (Linn.)
An abundant resident. I have many
varieties shot in different parts of the county.
60. Tree Sparrow. Passer montanus (Linn.)
Local but fairly plentiful, especially in
north Notts. There are a good many at
Rainworth, and I have several pairs breeding
in artificial nesting boxes fastened on the
trees in the plantations. This bird has quite
a little song, but I have only heard it rarely.
61. Chaffinch. Fnngilla cceltbs, Linn.
A very conspicuous bird and found in
numbers over the whole county ; large flocks
frequent the stubbles with other birds in the
autumn. It is one of the earliest to sing in
the new year. I have some very pretty and
striking varieties which have been shot in
Notts ; they are cream-coloured and pied, and
one with the usual white parts brick red.
62. Brambling. Fringilla montifringil/a, Linn.
Some winters this species is seen in large
flocks on the stubbles, and again in others
only in small numbers ; occasionally it stays
late. One was shot near Southwell in full
breeding plumage; on 17 April 1884 I
heard birds twittering on some high fir trees
in a wood at Rainworth, and as the notes
were new to me I shot a bird and found it
to be one of this species in full breeding
plumage. Saw one here II April 1903.
63. Linnet. Linota cannabina (Linn.)
A common resident. A white variety was
shot near Southwell in 1870 and is now in
my collection, also a grey-coloured one.
64. Mealy Redpoll. Linota I'maria (Linn.)
A rare winter visitor. I know of only one
specimen being obtained, and that was caught
on Mapperley Hills near Nottingham on 12
January 1848, and was taken alive to the
late Mr. Percy of Beeston, who identified it.
65. Lesser Redpoll. Linota rufescens (Vieillot)
Resident in Notts and breeds here and
there. It is most numerous in winter, when
it is found in flocks in company with siskins
frequenting alder and birch trees. I have
two pure white varieties in my collection shot
near Southwell in 1870. There are always
several nests about Rainworth every year.
66. Twite. Linota flavirostris (Linn.)
Very local and far from common. I have
a pair shot on Mansfield Forest where a few
can often be seen. It has nested once or
twice in this part of the county.
67. Bullfinch. Pyrrhula europtsa, Vieillot.
Found thinly distributed over the county.
A good many are taken by bird-catchers in
the autumn. A beautiful pale grey bird was
shot near Nottingham in 1869.
68. Pine Grosbeak. Pyrrhula enucleator (Linn.)
A beautiful male in rosy plumage was shot
by Dr. Dixon on 30 October 1890 when he
was partridge driving at Watnall. The bird
came and settled by the side of a small pond
to drink, and on seeing him flew up into a
tree where he shot it ; it is now in the col-
lection of Mr. Chaworth Musters of Annes-
ley Park.
69. Crossbill. Loxia curvirostra, Linn.
This bird is seen now and again in small
flocks, and has nested in the county on more
than one occasion. Daws of Mansfield once
saw old and young ones in Harlow Wood, and
in July 1870 I saw a female come down to
the side of the pond at Ramsdale to drink.
70. Parrot Crossbill.
Bechstein.
Loxia pityopsittacus,
A small party of these rare stragglers from
northern Europe visited a clump of Scotch
firs at Edwinstowe in the winter of 1849, and
seven were shot by Mr. Wells on 4 March of
that year.
71. American White- winged Crossbill. Loxia
leucoptera, J. F. Gmelin.
About the end of March 1 849 Mr. Wells
shot four of these birds in some fir trees near
Edwinstowe.
162
BIRDS
72. Two-barred Crossbill. Loxia bifasciata
(Brehm)
One of these rare stragglers was shot by
George Emery in the Residence Gardens at
Southwell about 1875. It was taken in the
flesh to the late F. Schumach, the taxidermist
of Southwell, who preserved it and put it
away. After his death it was given to me by
his son, who remembered seeing it when it
was brought to his father. The bird is in
beautiful plumage and is a most interesting
county specimen.
73. Black-headed Bunting. Emberiza melano-
cephala, Scopoli
Stanley, the bird-stuffer of Nottingham, had
a specimen in fine plumage brought to him
with some small birds which had been caught
near Nottingham in the spring of 1886.
The Rev. J. Ashworth seeing it there and
noticing that it was something out of the
common expressed a wish to have it ; Stanley
at once gave it him, little thinking how rare
it was. It was identified by Professor Newton.
Only three others have occurred in Britain.
74. Corn-Bunting. Emberiza miliaria, Linn.
Resident and fairly common in cultivated
parts of the county ; the nest of this bird is
very hard to find. It is often a very late
breeder, and I have found its nest at Rain-
worth in August. I have a pretty pied bird
shot in 1882 at Blidworth, and a pale cream-
coloured variety shot at Newstead Abbey in
1883.
75. Yellow Hammer. Emberiza citrine/la,
Linn.
A very common bird and frequents culti-
vated fields with high hedges ; I have several
very pretty varieties shot in the county.
76. Cirl Bunting. Emberiza cir/us, Linn.
Rare ; a few have been taken near Ollerton,
and Mr. Wells shot five at Edwinstowe in
1859. On 5 February 1897 two were
caught in a clap-net at Bagthorpe near Notting-
ham with some chaffinches. I bought the two
for is. kd. from their captor, and was very
pleased to get such rare county birds for my
collection.
77- Reed Bunting. Emberiza schceniclus, Linn.
Resident and fairly numerous in suitable
places. I have a pretty pied variety shot near
Newark-on-Trent.
78. Snow Bunting. Plectrophenax nivalis
(Linn.)
A rare winter visitor. A flock was seen
by Mr. Lowe at Highfields in January 1854,
three birds were shot at Oxton in 1880
by Mr. Musters, and in March 1901 when
driving with Mr. Aplin near Clipstone we
saw one on the high road ; the last specimen
was in good plumage and very tame.
79. Lapland Bunting. Calcarius lapponicus
(Linn.)
This rare straggler has occurred once in
Nottinghamshire ; it was shot by Mr. Wells
in the winter of 1850 amongst a number of
larks between Edwinstowe and Ollerton.
80. Starling. Sturnus vulgarly Linn.
A resident and very common, nesting in
any possible place it can find. I have nearly
100 boxes on trees at Rainworth, each one
containing a pair of these birds. Great
flocks get together early in July and keep in
company till the following spring. A fir
wood near Rainworth is a favourite place for
roosting in winter and is resorted to by tens
of thousands of starlings. I have a pure
white variety, also cream, grey and sandy-
coloured varieties shot in these parts. This
bird is single brooded.
8 1. Rose-coloured Starling. Pastor roseus
(Linn.)
Very rare. I know of only two speci-
mens, one shot many years ago by my father's
keeper at Ramsdale, and the other was killed
near West Bridgford and is in the collection
of Mr. Chaworth Musters of Annesley Park.
82. Nutcracker. Nucifraga caryocatactes(L'mn.)
One was seen at Ramsdale by my brother
in the winter of 1871. It flew out from a
thorn tree and he had a shot at it, but missed ;
on following it up he had a good view of it
several times, but could not secure it.
83. Jay. Garrulus glandarius (Linn.)
Fairly common, especially in big woods
where it nests ; great numbers come to us in
autumn. I have four white jays which have
been shot in the county, also a pied variety,
and I have heard of several others.
84. Magpie. Pica rustica (Scopoli)
Resident, but far from common. It is fairly
numerous in the southern portion of the county
but scarcer in the northern parts. I saw a nest
containing five eggs near Farnsfield in 1902
on the side of the high road in a small thorn
tree not more than 10 feet from the ground.
85. Jackdaw. Corvus monedula, Linn.
This bird nests in the old oaks in the
Birklands, and is scattered over the county in
autumn and winter. A pied one was seen
at Ollerton, and I have a brown variety shot
near Nottingham.
163
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
86. Raven. Corvus corax, Linn.
Has been seen in Sherwood Forest some
years ago. One was shot near Bingham
about 1879.
87. Carrion Crow. Corvus corone, Linn.
Not common. It breeds about Stoke and
a few other places in the southern part of the
county ; it is seen now and again near
Rainworth, where it nested in 1903.
88. Hooded Crow. Corvus cornix, Linn.
Scattered over the county especially in the
northern parts in autumn and winter. I
think there are more about Rainworth than
in other places. I have seen thirty-five on the
wing at one time, and in 1887 I counted
eighty-two flying over to their roosting
places in the forest. In 1892 I counted
eighty-six passing over, and in January 1879
twenty-three feeding at one time on an ash
heap near my house.
89. Rook. Corvus frugilegus, Linn.
This is an abundant resident and many
arrive in autumn ; there are many large
rookeries in Notts. I have white, brown
and cream-coloured varieties shot in the
county. Great numbers roost in Newstead
Park during the winter.
90. Sky Lark. Alauda arvensis, Linn.
A very common bird and found in large
numbers in the cultivated districts. A white
variety, and one with white wings, were
shot near Rainworth in 1884, and several
others in varied plumage have occurred from
time to time.
91. Wood Lark. Alauda arborea. Linn.
A very rare bird, but found occasionally in
the forest, where the late Mr. Sterland some
years back took its eggs j it has been seen
several times at Newstead.
92. Swift. Cypselus apus (Linn.)
Common in some parts, especially in
villages where there are houses with tiled
roofs. It is very plentiful in Mansfield, but
it seldom arrives before the first week in May
and leaves early in August.
93. Nightjar. Caprimulgus europ&us, Linn.
Plentiful during the summer months in
the forest but not nearly so numerous as
formerly, when I have seen a dozen on the
wing at once flying about the road between
Harlow and Thieves Woods.
94. Egyptian Nightjar. Caprimulgus tegyptiui,
Lichtenstein
The only British specimen was shot on
23 June 1883 in Thieves Wood near Mans-
field, by my keeper, who mistook it for a
light variety of the common nightjar. The
bird rose from the side of the drive on his
shooting at a rabbit and fell to his second
barrel. Only five other specimens are known
to have been obtained in Europe.
95. Wryneck. lynx torquilla, Linn.
I do not know any part of the county where
this bird is found in any numbers, but it
occasionally occurs in north Notts. I have
seen it at Rainworth only three times in
thirty years. It has nested once or twice
near Southwell.
96. Green Woodpecker. Gecinus viridis
(Linn.)
Fairly common in forests and large woods.
I had a pair nesting at Rainworth within 60
yards of my house in June 1902.
97. Great Spotted Woodpecker. Dendrocopus
major (Linn.)
Often seen, but not so abundant as the last
species. I have frequently seen one on the
park pales at Rainworth stripping the bark
for insects.
98. Lesser Spotted Woodpecker. Dendro-
copus minor (Linn.)
By no means common, but it is harder to
see than either of the above named birds. It
nested in Harlow Wood in 1888, and I have
seen it about Rainworth a few times.
99. Great Black Woodpecker. Picus martius,
Linn.
I know there are doubts oast on the
occurrence of this bird in Britain, but on the
evidence of Macgilljvray, who most certainly
is to be trusted, I add it to this list. In the
University Museum at Aberdeen there are
two specimens of this bird labelled ' Notting-
ham ' in the handwriting of the late Professor
Macgillivray and referred to by him in his
British Birds, iii. 79. He says ' two speci-
mens in my collection, a male and a female,
which I purchased from Dr. Madden, to
whom they had been sent by their owner as
having been shot near Nottingham. That
gentleman afterwards obtained for me a
certificate of the fact by the person who had
procured them.'
100. Kingfisher. Alcedt ispida, Linn.
This lovely bird is fairly common in
suitable localities, though numbers are shot
and caught every winter. I often see it at
Rainworth within a few yards of my house,
and it is delightful to watch it capturing
164
BIRDS
small fish. I only wish it were protected all
the year round.
101. Bee-eater. Merops apiaster, Linn.
One of these very rare and beautiful birds
was shot in the spring of 1878 on Mapperley
Plains near Nottingham, and was preserved
by Rose of Mount Street ; traces of where it
is now are lost.
102. Hoopoe. Upupa epops, Linn.
This striking bird has been seen and shot
in Notts several times ; one was shot at Wil-
ford in 1863, another seen near Ollerton about
the same time, and in 1889 Mr. Webb saw
one several times at Newstead Abbey.
103. Cuckoo. Cucului canarus, Linn.
Varies in numbers in different years but it
is always well distributed over the county. I
once took a chocolate coloured mature bird
from a trap in Harlow Wood, and the Rev.
W. Becher of Wellow also has one in this
plumage. The latest date at which I have
heard this bird sing was 13 July 1872, and I
am quite sure the adult cuckoo leaves directly
after its song ceases.
104. White or Barn Owl. Strix flammea,
Linn.
This bird is found thinly distributed over
Nottinghamshire and nests in old oaks in
Sherwood Forest ; it does a great deal of
good, which I am glad to say keepers are be-
ginning to find out. A pale cream-coloured
variety with pink eyes was shot near Newark
in the ' eighties ' and is in my collection.
105. Long-eared Owl. Am otus (Linn.)
Found in the fir woods in fair numbers and
in the forest, and is thinly distributed in the
south of the county.
1 06. Short-eared Owl. Asia accipitrinus
(Pallas)
Now and again a good many arrive in
autumn, and I once saw eight on the wing at
one time, and we sometimes see them when
shooting getting up from turnips. I have
looked for its nest in the open forest but have
never come across one.
107. Tawny Owl. Syrnium aluco (Linn.)
Observed in suitable localities, but far from
common. I have seen them in both shades
of plumage.
108. Little Owl. Athene noctua (Scopoli)
One was caught alive near Newark-on-
Trent in 1896, and another was shot in
October 1901 near Nottingham.
109. Marsh Harrier. Circus <eruginosus (Linn.)
The only record I have of this now rare
bird being killed in the county is one shot by
a keeper in Thoresby Park in 1848.
no. Hen Harrier. Circus cyaneus (Linn.)
Occurs now and again, birds of both sexes
having been killed at Welbeck, Newstead,
Rufford and other places. I have seen it at
Rainworth three or four times, on one oc-
casion a beautiful male in full plumage.
111. Montagu's Harrier. Circus cineraceus
(Montagu)
One of these birds was caught in a pole
trap at Ratcher Hill near Rainworth, and is
the only occurrence of which I have heard.
112. Buzzard. Buteo vulgarly Leach.
It is not often that this fine bird is seen
now, though formerly it was not so rare. I
have three eggs taken by the late Sir Arthur
Need when a boy (probably about the ' thirties ')
at Fountain Dale, from a nest in an old Scotch
fir tree not far from the lake there. The
latest of which I have any note was picked
up dead at Stoke by Sir Harry Bromley in
1900.
113. Rough-legged Buzzard. Buteo lagopus
(]. F. Gmelin)
Seen now and again, generally in the open
forest. Some years ago four or five were killed
at Ruffbrd. In March 1899 I saw one flying
over the lake at Rainworth, and it was about
for over a month and often seen ; its flight was
very beautiful, and on the wing it looked
about as large as a heron. There was also
one here this year (1903).
[Red-tailed Buzzard. Buteo borealis (Wil-
son)
Mr. Felkin of Lenton near Nottingham
stated in a list of birds he drew up in 1866,
and which he read at the British Association
meeting, that a buzzard was brought to him
in the flesh which had been killed between
Mansfield and Newstead in the autumn of
1850. He submitted it to the late Mr. Gould,
who identified it as Buteo borealis, and so far it
is the only British specimen.]
114. White-tailed Eagle. Haliaftus albicilla
(Linn.)
One was seen at Welbeck in 1838, and
was about there for three weeks. One was
shot at Osberton in January 1857 ; and another
measuring 7 ft. I in. across and weighing 9^
Ib. was shot by Mr. George Musters at Park
farm, Annesley, on 8 November 1896. The
latter had been seen a few days before being
165
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
shot feeding on rabbits, which abound in this
fine park.
115. Goshawk. Astur palumbarius (Linn.)
There are only two instances of the oc-
currence of this rare hawk in Nottingham-
shire ; one was shot by a keeper at Ruffbrd in
1848, and the other on Mansfield Forest.
n 6. Sparrow Hawk. Accipiter nisus (Linn.)
Fairly common in autumn but not as a nest-
ing species.
117. Kite. Milvus ictinus, Savigny.
Two of these now very rare hawks were
shot at Clifton near Nottingham a good many
years ago, and a female was shot by Mr.
Wells near Edwinstowe in 1860. The late
Mr. Sterland saw one flying over the forest in
May 1847 ; another was shot in November
1875 at Chilwell near Nottingham.
1 1 8. Honey Buzzard. Perms apivorus (Linn.)
Several of these birds have been shot and
trapped in Nottinghamshire. A pair were killed
in Ploughman Wood near Lowdham in the
summer of 1842, and another pair, male and
female, were both caught in the same trap by
their legs on 26 April 1858 ; other records
are, a female at Rufford in 1854, one at Toton
October 1863, and a pair shot near Park Hall
in 1897 ; the latter are in Mr. Musters' col-
lection.
119. Peregrine Falcon. Falco peregrinus,
Tunstall.
I have notes of a good many occurrences
of this bird. Of these I may mention one
shot at Ramsdale by my late father's bailiff
in 1840, and others shot at Ruffbrd, Park
Hall, Kirton and Rainworth. The last I
saw was in 1899.
1 2O. Hobby. Falco subiutto, Linn.
A summer visitor, but I once saw one in
Newstead Park on 9 December 1877, a^so
another near Rainworth in July 1875. It
has been shot at Ruffbrd, Ollerton, and other
places.
121. Merlin. Falco tesalon, Tunstall.
This bird has bred in Sherwood Forest,
and has been shot and seen many times at
Ruffbrd ; two were seen at Thrumpton and
were caught at one time in a clap-net near
Trent station. In November 1870 I shot
the largest specimen of this falcon I have ever
seen ; it was a female and was half as large
again as the usual size.
122. Kestrel. Falco tinnuncu/uiy Linn.
Fairly common and nests in several places.
Many come to us in autumn, and a cream-
coloured variety was seen at Park Hall in 1880.
It is very much scarcer than it was thirty
years ago.
123. Osprey. Pandion haliat'tus (Linn.)
The following occurrences are recorded :
one shot on the Trent near Nottingham
in 1839 ; a female caught alive at Beeston
Rylands in the same year ; one seen flying
over Thoresby Lake in 1855, which remained
about there for several weeks ; one shot at
East Bridgeford in 1865 ; one shot years ago
at Newstead Abbey ; one seen over Rainworth
Water in 1866 ; one caught in a hawk-trap
at Clipstone in the spring of 1871 ; one shot
near Nottingham in 1881 ; and one caught
at Rainworth in 1880.
124. Cormorant. Phalacrocorax carbo (Linn.)
One was shot on Thoresby Lake in August
1864 ; and another some years back at Lamb
Close, Eastwood ; also one at Annesley in
1883, and one on Mansfield reservoir in
April 1886.
125. Shag or Green Cormorant. Phalacro-
corax graculus (Linn.)
Two were shot at Burton Joyce on the
Trent in July 1851 ; in November 1879 a
man who was going to his work came upon
two of these birds in Cross Street, Notting-
ham, both of which he caught ; another was
shot on the same day while sitting on the
roof of a factory on Mapperley Plains.
126. Gannet or Solan Goose. Sula bassana
(Linn.)
It is curious that this sea-loving bird should
be so often found in this inland county. I
have notes of the gannet having been shot on
more than a dozen occasions. A full adult
which is now in my collection was caught by
a fox on the side of a pond at Fountain Dale ;
the fox was seen dragging the bird along by
its neck, but left it on being run after.
127. Common Heron. Ardea cinerea, Linn.
I am delighted to say this fine bird is fairly
plentiful, and I often see three or four from
my windows. The strongest heronry in the
county is at Stoke, where there are about forty
nests. It belongs to Sir Harry Bromley, who
kindly gave me a most wonderful nest which
was blown out of a tree ; the greater part is
made of wire with a stick intertwined here
and there, and how the bird ever got this
i6G
BIRDS
quantity of wire through the tree tops, to say
nothing of forming it into a perfect nest, is
marvellous. There are a few herons nesting
at Thoresby Park, also at Clumber and New-
stead.
128. Purple Heron. Ardea purpurea, Linn.
One of these birds was shot at Clifton near
Nottingham in 1868, and Mr. Forman has
one which was shot at Colwick some years
back. Rose the naturalist once showed me a
bird which looked very much like a cross
between the purple species and the common
heron, showing in its plumage markings of
each.
129. Great White Heron. Ardea alba, Linn.
Mr. Foljambe has a fine specimen of this
bird in his collection, which was shot at
Osberton.
130. Squacco Heron. Ardea ra//otdes, Scopoli.
This is another very rare straggler ; one
was shot by a keeper at Bestwood Park in
August 1871, and is in my collection.
131. Night Heron. Nycticorax griseus (Linn.)
Only one specimen has been noted, which
was shot in the autumn of 1820 at South
Clifton by Mr. Bassett.
132. Little Bittern. Ardetta minuta (Linn.)
A rare summer visitor. One was put up
from some flags on the side of the Trent near
Newark and shot, and another was shot on
24 May 1870 near Worksop.
133. Bittern. Botaurus stellarls (Linn.)
There are many records of this bird having
been killed in various parts of the county, of
which I may mention the following : at Col-
wick in 1848 ; at Clifton in 1871 ; on
Rainworth Water a pair, male and female, were
shot, and on one of the keepers holding the
former up by the legs five or six trout dropped
from its throat ; one was shot at Beeston in
1871 ; several during the severe winter of
1 88 1 ; one in the winter of 1891, and one
was shot at Welbeck in January 1903.
134. White Stork. Ciconia a/bay Bechstein.
Two instances only are recorded. In 1825
one was shot near Bawtry in the north corner
of the county ; and in 1829 a flock was seen
not far from the same place and two were
killed.
135. Spoonbill. Platalea leucorodia, Linn.
The visits of this bird are now few and far
between. In July 1831 one was followed by
Mr. Gee at Girton-on-Trent, but was not
captured. In the winter of 1 847 one was shot
by Mr. Maltby near Toton on the Notts side of
the Erewash ; and in 1843 one was seen on
the side of Rainworth Waters.
136. Gray Lag Goose. Amer dnereus, Meyer.
Rare, but has been seen on Thoresby and
Ruffbrd lakes. Sir Thomas White shot one
on his lake at Wallingwells, and another was
shot on the pond at Papplewick in 1885, and
sent to me by the late Mr. Henry Walter.
137. White-fronted Goose. Amer albifrons
(Scopoli)
In Mr. Felkin's list he states that this
goose has been killed in Nottinghamshire;
several were shot on the Trent in the great
frost of 1891.
138. Bean Goose. Anser segetum (J. F.
Gmelin)
This goose has been obtained several times
on the Trent near Newark ; Mr. Musters
shot two of these birds at Annesley in the
winter of 1891, when seven were about there
for a month.
139. Pink-footed Goose. Anser brachyrhyn-
cbus, Baillon.
I am only aware of one record of this
goose having been obtained in Notts, which
was in the winter of 1888-9 when Mr. W.
P. Sutton shot one at Langar in the south
of the county.
140. Bernacle Goose. Bernicla leucopsis (Bech-
stein)
In September 1869 fifty-two of these birds
flew close over my head at Ramsdale, and
were so near that I had no difficulty in dis-
tinguishing the species. One was shot flying
over a garden at Mansfield a few years back,
and another at Eastwood in December 1890.
141. Brent Goose. Bernicla brenta (Pallas)
The late Mr. Foottit shot one near Newark-
on-Trent, and another was shot by the Rev.
R. Sutton in the same neighbourhood in the
winter of 1850.
i
[Canada Goose. Anser canadensis (Linn.)
These birds are seen every winter flying
over in small and big companies, and they
nest on several pieces of water ; the greater
proportion are, I feel sure, domesticated ones.]
[Egyptian Goose. Anser egypticus (Linn.)
A party of six was seen on the Trent near
Clifton Hall on 5 December 1873, when two
of them were killed ; one was shot at East-
wood in 1868.]
167
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
142. Whooper Swan. Cygnus musicus, Bech-
stcin.
Formerly herds of these swans were often
seen passing over the county, but now it is a
rare sight. They are birds of hard winters.
A flock of twelve spent a few days on the
Trent in March 1845 ; two were killed on
the Trent in 1 848 near Newark ; one was
shot out of a flock of five at Lamb Close
Reservoir in 1871 ; another at Besthorpe in
November 1872; and I saw six on the lake
at Welbeck, 23 December 1902.
143. Bewick's Swan. Cygnus bewicki, Yar-
rell.
This species has been observed occasionally.
It has been shot near Newark-on-Trent by
Mr. Foottit, and also near Nottingham ; in
December 1899 a flock of sixty flew over
Mr. Musters' head at Annesley Park, and
from their size he was certain they were of
this species. Twenty-one settled on Rainworth
Water on 28 November 1902, when my son
shot two, one on the water, the other on the
wing, with a rifle.
144. Mute Swan. Cygnus olor (J. F. Gmelin)
It is common on all the waters in Notting-
hamshire, and I have seen as many as fifty-
eight on Thoresby Lake at one time. I have
no doubt the pure wild species occurs now
and again.
145. Common Sheld Duck. Tadorna cornuta
(S. G. Gmelin)
The late Mr.Sterland twice saw this duck on
the lake at Thoresby, and it has been noticed
on the river Idle at Retford ; a female was
shot in December 1864 at Beeston Rylands,
and one was shot on the Trent at Tnrump-
ton in January 1885. It has also been seen
at Newstead.
146. Ruddy Sheld-Duck. Tadorna casarca
(Linn.)
The late Mr. Webb saw two of these
striking ducks on the lake in Newstead Abbey
Park in 1869 ; they were very wild and in-
accessible and remained there some time.
147. Mallard or Wild Duck. Anas boscas,
Linn.
This duck is common all over the county,
more especially on the large lakes in north
Nottinghamshire ; I have seen over a hundred
on Rainworth Water at one time. It is an
early breeder, and I have found its nest in the
centre of a big wood half a mile from the
outside and a long way from water. I have
several pretty varieties, most of which were
taken in a trap at Park Hall and kindly given
me by Mr. Hall.
148. Gadwall. Anas strepera, Linn.
A rare Notts duck. One was shot near
Retford by Mr. Thorold in 1858. Mr.
Webb has seen them once or twice on the
lake at Newstead, and one was killed on the
lake at Fountain Dale by the late Sir A.
Need.
149. Shoveler. Spatula clypeata (Linn.)
This handsome duck has, I am glad to say,
increased of late years. The first pair I ever
saw nesting was in 1874, and in 1884 these
had increased to six pairs. It has bred at
Park Hall and other places during the last
few years. It generally nests away from
water.
1 50. Pintail. Dafila acuta (Linn.)
This is a very rare duck in Nottingham-
shire, but has been obtained on the Trent
near Newark. One was shot by Mr. Turner
in January 1903 on Forest Pond, and five were
seen at Annesley during the same month.
151. Teal. Nfttton crecca (Linn.)
Fairly common, and many breed on the
Nottinghamshire waters. We have had as
many as six pairs nesting at Rainworth ; it
also nests at Newstead, and on some of the
forest ponds.
152. Garganey. ^uerquedula circla (Linn.)
There are several occurrences of this bird.
A male was shot on the Trent near Newark
by Mr. Foottit ; Mr. Percy had a male and
female killed on the Trent near Beeston
fields ; the Rev. W. Becher obtained another
near Southwell about 1880, and a pair were
shot at Rainworth on 10 April 1880. I
wonder it is not more frequently seen, as the
waters at Rainworth are most suitable.
153. Wigeon. Mareca penelope (Linn.)
This is a winter visitor and is often seen
in large quantities on some of the lakes,
especially in the forest. Numbers frequent
the lake at Park Hall, and I have shot many
on the lakes at Rainworth. A slightly
wounded duck wigeon remained on the large
sheet of water at Lamb Close and was joined
by a male ; they nested and reared a good
brood. On 5 August 1883, when walking
round the lake here with Messrs. Aplin and
Bid well, we saw one of these ducks in full
breeding plumage ; it appeared in good health
and was by itself.
168
BIRDS
154. Pochard. Fuligula ferina (Linn.)
Fairly common as a winter visitor and can
be seen in all the winter months on the lake
at Thoresby, and also at Newstead.
155. Ferruginous Duck. Fuligula nyroca
(Guldenstadt)
One of these rare ducks was shot on the
Trent at Newark and was in Mr. Foottit's
collection ; a pair were seen on the lake at
Highfields near Nottingham, and another, a
female, was killed by Mr. Lowe.
156. Tufted Duck. Fuligula cristata (Leach)
Yarrell mentions that the first authenticated
nest was found in 1849, but long before this,
early in the ' twenties ' of the last century,
the bird was breeding in numbers on Rain-
worth Waters, and in 1872, when I first
came to live here, sixteen pairs were nesting ;
I can well remember my delight on seeing
them. It has nested every year since and
has given pleasure to many of our well known
naturalists ; large quantities occur all over the
northern parts of the county in the winter,
and many remain to breed. In May 1902 I
counted twenty-eight pairs on Thoresby Lake,
and quite as many at Newstead Abbey, and in
December of that year I saw at least 400 on
Welbeck Lake. It also nests at Park Hall,
Rufford, Osberton and on several other waters.
157. Scaup Duck. Fuligula mania (Linn.)
A rare winter visitor. It has been shot
once or twice on the Trent near Newark. I
shot a female on Mansfield reservoir on
i December 1883, and obtained another on
Rainworth Water in 1884. Mr. Hall has
one taken in the decoy at Park Hall.
158. Golden-eye. Clangula glaucion (Linn.)
A fair quantity visit the large lakes in Sher-
wood Forest during the winter and leave us
in early spring, but I have seen one on the
pond at Rainworth as late as April, where I
have shot a number from time to time ; I
have seen others killed at Park Hall and the
Mansfield reservoir, most of which were
young birds and females, but I have a grand
male in full plumage shot at Mansfield.
159. Long-tailed Duck. Harelda glacialis
(Linn.)
One of these sea-loving ducks, an immature
male, was killed at Newark in 1862, and was
taken to Mr. Foottit in the flesh ; another
was shot on the Trent at East Bridgeford on
i November 1881.
1 60. Common Eider Duck. Somateria
mollissima (Linn.)
Only one specimen, a female, is known,
which was shot on Nottingham meadows when
flooded about 1879, and brought in the flesh
to Rose the bird-stuffer, who sold it to me.
1 6 1 . Common Scoter. CEdemia nigra (Linn.)
This bird has occasionally been seen on
the Trent at Newark, also near Nottingham.
One was shot in the winter of 1868 at Wil-
ford Ferry ; another by Sir A. Need at
Fountain Dale, and four were seen on the
reservoir at Lamb Close, Eastwood, on 22
August 1898, which was rather a curious time ;
one was obtained by Captain Hall at Park
Hall many years ago, and is preserved there ;
and another was on Rainworth Water in
November 1882.
162. Velvet Scoter. CEdemia fusca (Linn.)
A very rare visitor. One was shot at
Welbeck some few years back, which is in
the Duke of Portland's collection ; and
another was shot by Mr. W. Hollins at
Pleasley Vale on the lake which forms the
county boundary.
163. Goosander. Mergus merganser, Linn.
Occurs every winter on Thoresby Lake.
Mr. Sterland once counted forty-three there
at one time. It is also seen at Newstead
Abbey ; and one day when shooting at Rain-
worth we found over forty on the Rainworth
Water, three being shot. Mr. Hall has shot
several at Park Hall, and I have often seen
small parties on the Mansfield reservoir. It
generally arrives about the end of October
and has remained on one occasion as late as
May.
164. Red-breasted Merganser. Mergus ser-
rator, Linn.
Much rarer than the last bird. It has been
shot on the Trent at Newark, and there is a
fine male in Mr. Percy's collection. A pair
were killed at Newstead in March 1844, and
one was shot near Retford many years ago by
my father ; another was shot at Annesley
Park in 1876; and I killed a female on
Rainworth Lake in January 1890.
165. Smew. Mergus albellus. Linn.
From time to time this pretty duck is seen
on our sheets of water. Mr. Sterland saw it
many times on Thoresby Lake, and it has
been obtained on the Trent several times.
A female was shot on Rainworth Water ; six
were seen together on the pond at Highfields
169
22
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
near Nottingham, four of which were killed
at one shot. Mr. Hall has two which were
killed at Park Hall, and a pair were obtained
at Beeston Rylands near Nottingham in
1891.
1 66. Ring Dove or Wood Pigeon. Columba
palumbus, Linn.
A very common bird, and flocks of several
hundreds are seen on the new seed fields near
Mansfield in winter. It breeds in quantities
and does much damage to young seeds. I
once shot twelve at a ' right and left,' and
I have white, sandy and cream-coloured
varieties, also a very pretty pied one which
was shot near Mansfield.
167. Stock Dove. Columba aenas. Linn.
Fairly common locally, but not so numer-
ous as the last species, I have four or five
pairs nesting in boxes put up in the trees at
Rainworth. In my collection there is a very
pretty hybrid between a stock-dove and a
common tame pigeon. The bird was hatched
in one of the old hollow oak trees where the
pair were often seen together, and it was shot
at Haywood Oaks. I have also a pretty
speckled variety, shot at Rainworth, but in
this species varieties are very rare.
1 68. Turtle Dove, lurtur communis, Selby.
The first turtle-doves ever noticed in Not-
tinghamshire, to my knowledge, were observed
in the very dry summer of 1868, when I
shot one which was the first stuffed in Not-
tingham ; since then they have increased and
are now common. In May 1902 I saw a
flock of twenty-seven, but it is rare to see
them in flocks of such size.
169. Pallas's Sand Grouse. Syrrhaptes para-
doxus (Pallas)
In the extraordinary flight of these birds
that visited Great Britain in 1863 five were
killed ; a pair, male and female, were shot in
May at Farnsfield ; another male at Farnsfield
on 20 August ; and a pair of females were
caught in rabbit traps on Two Oaks farm
near Mansfield. A much larger flight visited
us in 1888, when I saw as many as sixty
together in the forest ; and one day in June
of that year thirty-two flew over my head in
the Deer Park at Rainworth. They had all
left by the following October. Two eggs
were taken in the forest, but were broken
before I could secure them.
170. Black Grouse. Tetrao tetrix, Linn.
I am delighted to say we still have a few
of these grand game birds in the forest, and
some forty years back packs of fifties were
about. I have heard of a man who killed eight
at one shot when sunning themselves on some
rails. The species has become more scarce,
as the odd bits of forest have been enclosed ;
but I hope it will be long ere it is a bird of
the past in these parts.
171. Red Grouse. Lagopus scoticus (Latham)
Now and again in severe winters this bird
is driven from the Derbyshire moors and is
shot in Nottinghamshire. A male was killed
at Bevercotes in 1860 ; in 1863 several were
killed near Nottingham ; one was shot at
Clipstone in 1 883, and one was seen on Mans-
field Forest in January 1903.
172. Pheasant. Phasianus colcbkus, Linn.
Found in quantities all over the county,
and in addition many thousands of tame birds
are turned up. Over 2,000 have been killed
in a day at Welbeck.
173. Partridge. Perdix cinerea, Latham.
Nottinghamshire is one of the best counties
for this species of game bird, particularly in
the middle and north, where it is very numer-
ous. At Welbeck over 600 brace have been
shot in one day, and Mr. Hollins has killed
over 300 brace in a day at Berry Hill near
Mansfield. I saw a very pretty pale cream-
coloured variety shot one day at Clipstone.
The large increase is due to driving and turn-
ing up Hungarian birds.
[Virginian Colin. Perdix virginiana
(Latham)
Several of these birds have been obtained
in the county, and though they have been
turned out in numbers in various parts of
England as far back as Montagu's time, I
think it as well to notice this species. I have
one shot at Thrumpton in September 1872,
and another was killed at the same place
shortly after.]
174. Red-legged Partridge. Caccabis rufa
(Linn.)
About 1872 the late Duke of Portland
turned some of these birds out, and they were
added to by Mr. Lees ; a few were obtained
prior to this time, but it was then a rare bird.
Latterly they have increased much, and as
many as forty-eight brace have been shot in
a day at Welbeck.
175. Quail. Coturnix communis, Bonnaterre.
This is not so plentiful as formerly, and is
regarded in these days as a rare bird. I have
shot it at Ramsdale in September and Decem-
ber ; it has nested there on several occasions,
and also at Rainworth. In 1 874 I killed seven
in one day at Ramsdale.
170
BIRDS
176. Corn Crake or Land Rail. Crex pra-
tensis, Bechstein.
A spring visitor, formerly very plentiful but
now much rarer. I fancy the mowing
machine has much to answer for this. A
pale cream-coloured variety was shot near
Newark-on-Trent and is in my collection.
177. Spotted Crake. Porzana maruetta
(Leach)
Has been killed in various parts of the
county ; twenty-five were brought to one
bird-stuffer in Nottingham in 1871, in which
year several pairs nested in Nottingham
meadows.
178. Baillon's Crake. Porzana baillom (Vieil-
lot)
On 22 June 1893 a man going to work
in the early morning picked up one of these
birds from under the telegraph wires close to
Gedling near Nottingham ; it was an adult
specimen in beautiful plumage, and looked
rather as if it might have been nesting.
Another of these crakes was shot near Retford
a short time after.
179. Water Rail. Rallus aguaticus, Linn.
This retiring bird is, I believe, more com-
mon than is supposed. I have often seen it
at Rainworth, and have shot several near
Epperstone. I have no doubt it nests, though
I have never found one.
1 80. Moorhen. Gallinula chloropus (Linn.)
Common on all streams and ponds ; there
are great numbers on the different pieces of
water at Rainworth. A tawny variety was
killed some years back in Nottingham mea-
dows, and in 1894 my son also shot one at
Rainworth. Mr. Watson of Beeston has a
pretty speckled variety obtained near there in
1872. A beautiful white bird shot at Glebe
Thorpe in 1901 is in my collection.
181. Coot. Fulica atra, Linn.
Fairly common, but local. There are
numbers on the lake at Thoresby, and also on
Rainworth Water ; a pied variety was shot
on the mill dam at Southwell.
182. Crane. Grus communis, Bechstein.
This very rare straggler has only been ob-
tained in the county once, when it was shot
by a man on the Trent near Gunthorpe in
1851, and bought for Js. 6ct. by Cutts for
Mr. Felkin. It was a young male in imma-
ture plumage, and is now in the Nottingham
Museum.
183. Little Bustard. Otis tetrax, Linn.
There are several occurrences of this bird —
one in 1854 at Shelton, where it was feeding
with some fowls ; another at South Clifton
on 21 December 1856 ; I have two, bought
at a sale of Mr. Foottit's collection, which
were killed near Newark ; the male is in full
breeding plumage, and was the first ever seen
in Britain in this state (since then one was
killed in Norfolk in 1898, also in full
plumage).
184. Stone Curlew. CEdicnemus scolopax
(S. G. Gmelin)
This fine bird has been seen many times
in Nottinghamshire. It has been shot at
RufFord, Farnsfield, Papplewick and New-
stead. A pair nested near Rainworth in
1881, also in 1887 and 1891, and I have
two of these eggs in my collection.
185. Dotterel. Eudromias morinellus (Linn.)
A few were shot on Oxton Warren about
1860, and I killed a young bird at Ramsdale,
2O August 1890. Small flocks are seen
occasionally in May on Ratcher Hill ; about
twenty were there for a few days in May
1901, resting on their way north.
1 86. Ringed Plover. /Egialitis hiaticula
(Linn.)
A good many have been seen from time to
time, and several have been obtained on the
side of Mansfield reservoir. In August 1873
eight were seen on the side of a small stream
at Rainworth and two were shot. It has
also been shot at Burton Joyce and Wilford.
187. Golden Plover. Charadrius pluvialis,
Linn.
Some years, and more often in the spring,
great numbers of this species are seen in the
large fields at Rainworth, and stay till the
end of March, when many have got their
black breasts. A scattered few are found in
suitable localities in autumn, and I know no
place where they are oftener seen than at
Papplewick.
1 88. Grey Plover. Squatarola helvetica (Linn.)
This is a rare straggler, and I have notes
of only four occurrences in Nottinghamshire —
one, a fine old bird, in my collection, shot at
Mansfield reservoir ; one killed at Sutton ;
one near Edwinstowe, and one near Notting-
ham.
189. Lapwing. Vanellus vulgarly Bechstein.
A resident and seen in large flocks ; it
breeds in fair numbers, especially in north
171
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Notts. I have a beautiful cream-coloured
variety which was shot in November 1899
near Farnsfield.
190. Turnstone. Stref si/as interpret (Linn.)
Mr. G. Attenbury shot two of these birds
near Sutton-on-Trent, and my father killed
one at Ramsdale. These are the only occur-
rences of which I have heard.
191. Oyster-Catcher. H<ematopus ostra/egus,
Linn.
A rare Notts bird. I have one shot at
Mansfield reservoir in 1870; one was shot
near Newark -on -Trent, and was in Mr.
Foottit's collection ; and a third was ob-
tained near Ollerton in 1875, and is in the
collection of Lord Savile at Rufford Abbey.
192. Avocet. Rtcurvirostra avocetta, Linn.
A few of these striking birds have been
killed. One was shot on the Trent at Barton
Ferry near Beeston in 1 800 ; another was
killed at Fiskerton in 1859 ; another was
seen at Thrumpton on the Trent side ; and
a fourth, in immature plumage, was seen on
24 July 1856 on the banks of the stream at
Edwinstowe and killed by a boy with a stick.
193. Black-winged Stilt. Himantopus candi-
dus, Bonnaterre.
The first and only instance of this bird
having been seen in Nottinghamshire was at
Perlethorpe near Ollerton on 30 January
1848, when Mr. Mansel and his son saw
one, apparently feeding, in a shallow ditch in
an ashholt bordering the stream. It rose
with a shrill cry, and flew low towards the
river. They had a clear view of the bird
both standing and flying, and had no doubt
of its identity.
194. Grey Phalarope. Phalaropus fulicarlus
(Linn.)
Two were shot near Newark-on-Trent,
and were in Mr. Foottit's collection ; one
was shot near Eastwood in i88i,and another
at Holme near Newark in 1891. I have
two in my collection, one shot about 1870
on Mansfield reservoir, and the other killed on
Rainworth Water. All these occurred in
the autumn.
195. Red-necked Phalarope. Phalaropus hy-
perboreus (Linn.)
Only one specimen of this very pretty
little bird has been obtained. It was shot by
my father on the side of his pond at Rams-
dale 6 July 1843.
196. Woodcock. Scolopax rusticu/a, Linn.
A fairly common autumn visitor, and a few
remain and nest. Some woods attract this
bird more than others, and certain places in
such woods. Thieves Wood is a favourite
covert, and thirty-six have been killed there
in one day. Newstead Park is another good
locality. It breeds in some numbers in Birk-
land, also Harlow Wood, Ruffbrd, Newstead
and Annesley. I have a white variety killed
in Thoresby Park in 1861.
197. Great Snipe. Gallmago major (J. F.
Gmelin)
This bird has been obtained occasionally,
but it is a very rare visitor. One was shot
years ago by Mr. John Hardy at Bestwood
Park, one at Hickling near Nottingham on
3 October 1882, and the Rev. W. Becher
killed another near Southwell in 1883.
198. Common Snipe. Gallmago caelesth
(Frenzel)
This species is scattered over Notts in suit-
able places and breeds in a good many parts.
There are generally several nests at Rain-
worth, and I have found one within 100
yards of my house. The late Mr. Cursham
in one day shot twenty-five couples on the
end of Mansfield reservoir when the water
was low, and could have got more but ran
short of cartridges. A white variety was
seen near Blidworth several times in 1883.
1 99. Jack Snipe. Gallinago gallinula (Linn.)
Not as plentiful as it was thirty years ago
when I have killed several in one day ; now
I rarely see one. I once flushed one on
I September 1867, a very early date.
200. Dunlin. Tringa a/pina, Linn.
It has been seen and shot on the side of
the Trent several times, both near Nottingham
and Newark. I have some which were killed
on the side of Mansfield reservoir and at Park
Hall ; also one killed on Rainworth Water.
201. Little Stint. Tringa minuta, Leisler.
Two were shot near Newark-on-Trent ;
it has also been killed on the side of Mans-
field reservoir, and one in my collection was
shot in August 1881 on the Trent near
Nottingham.
202. Temminck's Stint. Tringa temmincki,
Leisler.
Very rare indeed with us. The only
specimen which has been obtained was shot
on the side of Mansfield reservoir about 1869
and is now in my collection.
172
BIRDS
ham meadows in 1880; and the third
o
was
203. Curlew Sandpiper. Tringa subarquata H. Bayly ; a second was obtained in Notting-
(Gttldenstadt)
A rare straggler. One was shot on the
Trent near Newark, and two on the side of
Mansfield reservoir about 1870. I have seen
one on the side of the pond at Ramsdale.
killed by James May, keeper, on the side of
Mansfield reservoir in August 1884. The
last is a nice specimen, and is now in
collection.
my
204. Purple Sandpiper. Tringa striata, Linn.
The winter is the usual time when this
species pays its visits, but curiously enough
one was shot on the side of the Trent near
Wilford Ferry in the summer of 1864 by
Mr. G. Price. Another was picked up by a
tramp under some telegraph wires near Larch
farm, Blidworth, and brought to me when
shooting ; it was still quite warm, and the
man told me there were six or seven more in
the flock.
205. Knot. Tringa canutus. Linn.
I have notes of two occurrences only — one
shot by Mr. Besley on the side of the Trent
near Nottingham, and another in full breed-
ing plumage shot by the late Sir Arthur Need
on the side of a pond at Fountain Dale. The
latter is now in my collection.
206. Sanderling. Calidris arenaria (Linn.)
The only record of this bird in the county
is one killed by the Rev. R. Sutton near
Newark in 1850.
207. Ruff. Machetes pugnax (Linn.)
A rare bird. Two were shot on the side
of the Trent near Newark ; one was obtained
in 1870 at Clipstone ; and James May, keeper,
killed a female on the side of the reservoir at
Mansfield in August 1892.
208. Common Sandpiper. Totanus hypoleucus
(Linn.)
The common sandpiper is a spring and
autumn visitor, but though one or two have
remained more than once all the summer on
the side of the reservoir at Lamb Close its
nest has never been found. It is said to have
nested on the side of the Trent.
209. American Spotted Sandpiper. Totanus
macularius (Linn.)
In March 1848 John Eyre, then head-
keeper at Thoresby, flushed and shot one of
these very rare birds. It was feeding on the
side of a shallow stream at Budby just on the
outskirts of Thoresby Park.
210. Wood Sandpiper. Totanus glareola
(J. F. Gmelin)
Has only been obtained three times in
Notts. One was shot at Kirklington by Mr.
211. Green Sandpiper. Totanus ochropus
(Linn.)
An occasional visitor to this county, and
has been seen and shot on the side of the
Trent and also on Mansfield reservoir. I
have obtained two and seen several at Rain-
worth.
212. Redshank. Totanus calidris (Linn.)
This species is oftener seen in the spring
than at any other time of the year, and, I am
glad to say, breeds in fair numbers in mea-
dows near Rolleston, also near Newark-on-
Trent, Retford and Bawtry. It has been
shot near Mansfield in winter.
213. Spotted Redshank. Totanus fuscus
(Linn.)
Only two specimens are known to have
been found in this county. One was shot on
the side of a pond at Halloughton near South-
well, and the other, now in my collection,
was killed on the side of a small pond in
Bestwood Park on 3 September 1872. There
were a pair, but one escaped.
214. Greenshank. Totanus canescens (J. F.
Gmelin)
Several of these birds have been shot on
the Trent near Newark. One was killed
near Ollerton, another on the side of the
Trent near Muskham in September 1844,
and one at Beeston in August 1871. The
last of which I have heard was obtained on
the side of the reservoir at Lamb Close in
September 1873.
215. American Yellowshank. Totanus flavi-
pes (J. F. Gmelin)
This very rare visitor to Britain has once
been obtained ; it was killed at Misson in
Nottinghamshire in the winter of 1854-5.
2 1 6. Bar-tailed Godwit. Limosa lapponica
(Linn.)
Has been obtained several times both in
spring and autumn, on two occasions near
Newark-on-Trent. In May 1846 a flock
was seen and several killed near Nottingham ;
and in September 1874 a flock of about
thirty flew over some partridge shooters near
Farnsfield and four were killed.
173
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
217. Black-tailed Godwit. Litnosa belgica
(J. F. Gmelin)
Two or three specimens have occurred —
one near Newark, another near Ollerton, and
one was shot near Newark in September 1892,
which was first seen amongst some fowls.
2 1 8. Common Curlew. Numenius arquata,
(Linn.)
From time to time this bird is seen, gener-
ally flying over. It has also been killed on
several occasions at Thoresby, Edwinstowe,
Ramsdale, Oxton, and Mansfield reservoir.
219. Whimbrel. Numenius phaopus (Linn.)
Much rarer than the last species. In 1847
one was shot at Trent Bridge, Nottingham.
I shot one at Ramsdale in August 1865 ;
one near Ollerton in 1882, and one near
Mansfield about 1880. I heard them passing
over my house in May 1 90 1 .
220. Black Tern. Hydrochelldon nigra (Linn.)
Not an uncommon spring visitor on the
Trent. I saw them flying over the lake at
Rainworth in 1885, and again in 1887 ; it
has also been shot at Mansfield reservoir.
221. Caspian Tern. Sterna caspia, Pallas.
A specimen of this very rare straggler was
killed on the border of the county at Cay-
thorpe on 17 May 1863 and was taken in
the flesh to Mr. Foottit of Newark.
222. Sandwich Tern. Sterna cantiaca, J. F.
Gmelin.
One was seen by Mr. Whitlock in May
1888 flying up and down the Trent at Barton
Ferry.
223. Common Tern. Sterna fluviati/is, Nau-
mann.
This is a frequent spring visitor and has
been obtained on many occasions ; hardly a
spring passes without one or more being
noticed on Mansfield reservoir and the Trent.
I have seen it flying over Rainworth Lake.
224. Arctic Tern. Sterna macrura, Nau-
mann.
As far as I am aware only two specimens
have been shot, both occurring on the Trent
near Newark.
225. Little Tern. Sterna minuta, Linn.
This little bird has occurred several times,
twice in winter. In 1838 one was shot on
the Trent near Nottingham, and taken to
Mr. Felkin ; another was seen by Mr. Foottit
flying over the stream near Southwell, and one
now in Mr. Musters' collection was killed at
Annesley. Others have been observed at
Thoresby and Mansfield reservoir.
226. Little Gull. Larus minutus, Pallas.
A rare straggler. One was shot on the
Trent near Clifton Grove in December 1870,
and a second on the same river near Notting-
ham on 29 December 1892.
227. Black-headed Gull. Larus ridibundus,
Linn.
This gull is a constant visitor ; it is shot
on the Trent continually, and has been killed
at many places in the county. I have seen
them about the lakes at Rainworth very late
in the spring and have wondered they have
not nested there as it is a very suitable
locality.
228. Common Gull. Larus canus, Linn.
Frequently seen and generally in winter and
early spring. Flocks have been seen on the
Trent and also on the Nottingham Corpora-
tion farm at Burton Joyce ; one was obtained
at Ramsdale in September 1863, and I have
noticed them near Rainworth.
229. Herring Gull. Larus argentatus, J. F.
Gmelin.
Neither so common nor so much of an
inland bird as the two last species. It has
often been seen on the Trent ; I saw one at
Rainworth on 20 October 1898, and my son
saw six there on 15 April 1899.
230. Lesser Black-backed Gull. Larus fuscus,
Linn.
This bird is more frequent than the last and
is seen from time to time flying over the
Trent. One was shot at Bothamsall near
Ollerton in May 1855, another on Markham
Moor in May 1859, onc near Nottingham
in May 1866, and I saw two flying over
Rainworth Park on 21 September 1898. I
have one in full plumage killed near Mansfield
about 1870.
231. Great Black-backed Gull. Larus mar i-
nus, Linn.
This fine gull has been killed several times
on the Trent both in mature and immature
plumage. One frequented a fallow field near
Newark-on-Trent for two months ; in 1862
an immature bird was shot at Lamb Close
reservoir ; I saw a mature bird of this
species fly low over my house on 23 Sep-
tember 1896, and another in the same
plumage on 5 April 1902.
232. Glaucous Gull. Larus glaucus, Fabri-
cius.
A rare straggler, and I have heard of only
174
BIRDS
two, which were shot on the Trent at
Beeston Weir on 22 December 1872 ; one is
in the collection of Mr. S. Watson of Beeston
and the other is in my collection.
233. Kittiwake. Rlssa tridactyla (Linn.)
This bird has been shot often, not only on
the Trent but in various parts of the county,
and has been obtained at the following places :
Newark - on - Trent, Fiskerton, Mansfield
reservoir, Rain worth Waters, Thoresby,
Bestwood, etc.
234. Great Skua. Megalestris catarrbactts,
(Linn.)
A rare wanderer. On 22 August 1898
my son saw one of these birds when fishing ;
it was flying over the water at Lamb Close
reservoir, chasing the green plover ; several
times it came close to the boat and was about
for some hours.
235. Pomatorhine Skua. Stercorarlus poma-
torhinus (Temminck)
I have never heard of this species occurring
more than once, when one was shot near
Farnsfield in November, 1875 ; it is now in
my collection.
236. Arctic or Richardson's Skua. Ster-
corarius crepidatus (]. F. Gmelin)
One of this species, a bird of the year,
was shot between Farnsfield and Southwell
and was in the late Mr. Foottit's collection
at Newark-on-Trent.
237. Long-tailed or Buffon's Skua. Sterco-
rarius parasiticus (Linn.)
[ have notes of two specimens ; one shot
at Clipstone near Mansfield in 1879, now ln
my collection, and another killed near Tux-
ford in 1 88 1.
238. Razorbill. Alca torda, Linn.
A scarce straggler to this county. One
was shot on the Trent near Nottingham in
January 1847, and another was obtained near
Eastwood in 1870.
239. Guillemot. Uria triole (Linn.)
Mr. Sterland saw several of these birds in
December 1855 on the lake at Thoresby,
where they stayed for a week or two ; he
saw them several times, and watched them
diving for fish.
240. Little Auk. Mergulus alle (Linn.)
Has been observed several times, generally
after storms. In November 1841 one was
shot at Radcliffe-on-Trent, one was killed at
Holme Pierrepont in January 1847, and
another was picked up at Lenton after a gale
m 1849. I" November 1877 one was found
dead under the telegraph wires near Rain-
worth, and in November 1878 two were shot
at Wollaton. Others have occurred since.
241. Puffin. Fratcrcula arcttca (Linn.)
Miss Webb, the daughter of the vicar of
Mansfield-Woodhouse, picked up one of these
birds on the road near the vicarage in Novem-
ber 1 884 ; this is the only specimen of which
I have heard, and is, thanks to her kindness,
in my collection.
242. Great Northern Diver. Colymbus gla-
ciatis, Linn.
This very fine bird has, as far as I know,
only been obtained in this county twice ; one
was shot on the Trent near Newark and is
now in Nottingham Museum, and the other
was killed by Mr. Caborn near Wilford, on
the Trent, in the winter of 1853.
243. Black-throated Diver. Colymbus arcticus
T ' '
Linn.
Has been shot or taken a few times within
our borders. One was found frozen in the
ice of a pond near Worksop in January 1848,
and three others have been obtained on the
Trent near Newark, two of them being taken
in the flesh to Mr. Foottit.
244. Red-throated Diver. Colymbus septen-
trionalis, Linn.
This bird has visited Nottinghamshire more
often than either of the two mentioned above.
Mr. Felkin says he has known five to have
been killed in one day on the Trent in win-
ter ; the late Mr. Percy had one in his col-
lection shot at the Trent Bridge, Nottingham;
one was shot on Mansfield reservoir in 1876,
another in 1878, and I also saw one on that
sheet of water in 1877 and tried to get a shot
at it, but without success. Mr. Barber's
keeper killed one on the reservoir at Lamb
Close in 1876.
245. Great Crested Grebe. Podicipes c ristatus
(Linn.)
Since the Bird Act came into force this fine
bird has increased very much, and now breeds
on many of the waters in Nottinghamshire.
I saw three pairs nesting at Thoresby in 1 902,
two pairs on Mansfield reservoir, and several
pairs at Newstead. It nested at Rainworth
in 1898, 1899 and 1900, but not since. It
has also been obtained at Lamb Close, Pap-
plewick, Ollerton, and on the Trent. Twelve
pairs nested on Mansfield reservoir in 1903.
175
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
246. Red-necked Grebe. Podicipes griseigena
(Boddzrt)
There are notes of this bird's occurence on
several occasions. One was shot near the
Trent Bridge in December 1843, another, a
male in full summer plumage, was killed at
Clifton in June 1850, two or three have been
obtained near Newark-on-Trent, and I have
one shot on the Trent near Nottingham in
1876.
247. Sclavonian Grebe. Podicipes auritus
(Linn.)
Occurs now and again in the county.
Several have been seen and shot on the Trent ;
one was killed near Nottingham in 1 838, one
at Barton in January 1848 ; Mr. Felkin states
that one was killed on the Trent in the sum-
mer. I have one shot at Fountain Dale in
November 1882 ; also one obtained on the
Trent in 1881.
248. Eared Grebe. Podicipes nigricollis
(Brehm)
I have notes of this grebe being obtained
twice in Nottinghamshire. Schumach, the
taxidermist of Southwell, preserved one which
was shot on the Trent near Fiskerton in the
winter of 1864, and Mr. Barber's keeper
killed one, an immature bird, on Lamb Close
reservoir on 4 August 1876.
249. Little Grebe or Dabchick. Podicipes
JiuviatiUs (Tunstall)
This shy little bird frequents the ponds and
streams in Nottinghamshire in fair numbers,
and nests more frequently than is supposed.
There are always a few pairs at Rainworth,
and their tittering call is heard oftener than
the bird is seen. I once saw the bird diving
in clear water and it did not use its wings,
and I have also seen a small party of seven
together in the winter on Mansfield reser-
voir.
250. Storm Petrel. Procellaria pelagica, Linn.
There are many notes of this bird having
been driven by storms from its usual haunts
into Notts. One was shot in May 1 843 at
the Trent Bridge, Nottingham ; during east-
erly gales in the winter of 1845 a pair, male
and female, were seen on Thoresby Lake and
were both killed by a keeper ; in 1861 two
more were obtained at the Trent Bridge,
Nottingham ; one at Papplewick ; and on 1 7
November 1872 one was picked up near Bui-
well. I have in my collection one shot on
Mansfield reservoir in 1870.
251. Leach's Fork-tailed Petrel. Oceano drama
leucorrhoa (Vieillot)
This rare straggler has now and again been
observed in the county. One noted by Mr.
R. Enfield was shot at Burton Joyce in the
winter of 1840 ; another, now in my col-
lection, was killed near Lenton by Mr. Moult
of Old Radford in November 1878, and Mr.
R. Evans of Nottingham shot one at Bunny
Park in September 1900.
252. Manx Shearwater. Puffinus anglorum
(Temminck)
This is another rare Notts bird. One was
picked up dead on I September 1888 at Sutton-
in-Ashfield and is in my collection ; a second
was found near Retford in September 1891.
ADDENDA
2(7. Dusky Thrush. Turdus dubius (Bechst.).
One shot at Gunthorpe by Mr. Mills,
13 October, 1905, was by itself, and is the
first British specimen.
760. Ortolan Bunting. Emberiza hortulana,
Linn.
One caught on Rock Hill near Mansfield
in a clap net, Feb. 1858, and now in the
collection of Mr. Daws of Mansfield.
162. Velvet Scoter. Oedemia fusca, Linn.
After the article was in print the writer
saw the specimen which was shot at Plea-
sley Vale, and found it to be a common
scoter.
i86tf. Kentish Plover. Aegialit'u cantiana
(Latham).
One was seen on 13 April, 1904, by the
writer's son in a field of young wheat near
one of the ponds at Rainworth. It was with-
in fifteen yards of him for some time, and as
he knows this species well, there was no doubt
as to the identity.
176
MAMMALS
Although most of the larger indigenous mammals of Nottingham-
shire are now extinct there is no doubt that up to a few centuries ago
the forest of Sherwood, which covered a considerable part of the county,
afforded shelter to most of the British species. The red deer was abun-
dant, the wolf, pine marten, polecat, badger and otter were all probably
common, and we have evidence of the existence of the wild boar, roe
deer and wild cat. Of these, descendants of the red deer still exist in a
semi-domesticated state, the marten and polecat have been captured in
the county within recent years, and the badger and otter are by no means
very rare even now.
From very early times up to at least the reigns of James I. and
Charles I. Sherwood Forest was a favourite hunting ground of our
English monarchs, being tenanted by numerous herds of red deer which,
though of course quite wild, were strictly protected by the harsh and
oppressive forest laws which regarded the unauthorized killing of a deer
as a crime more heinous than homicide. Camden, writing in the time
of James I., tells us that the forest still supported ' an infinite number of
deer and branchy-headed stags.' From a survey taken in 1635 it appears
that the number of red deer in the forest was 1,367, and as late as the
reign of Queen Anne a yearly grant of £1,000 was made for the preser-
vation of the deer and maintenance of a hunting establishment. At this
time they were so abundant as to cause great loss to the surrounding
landowners by feeding upon their crops, and many were the complaints
made against ' the intolerable burden of the Queen's deer.' The subse-
quent gradual disafForestation and enclosure of the district resulted in the
reduction of the herds and their confinement within the limits of the
parks formed out of the ancient forest.
That the forest was in early times infested with wolves is proved by
the fact that as late as 1433 an official existed who held certain land in
Mansfield Woodhouse, called ' wolf hunt land,' by service of winding a
horn and chasing or frightening the wolves in the forest of Sherwood.
In an inland county it is not to be expected that any of the Cetacea
should often occur, and indeed the only member of the order which has
been certainly known to ascend the Trent into Nottinghamshire is the
porpoise. This species occurs frequently, and a single individual was
quite recently shot in the river close to Newark.
Of our remaining mammals the fallow deer, which forms so grace-
ful an ornament of many of our parks, the all too common brown rat and
the ubiquitous rabbit are introductions within historic times. Among
i 177 23
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
the smaller forms further research will perhaps lead to the discovery of
other species of bats besides those now recorded ; the pigmy shrew may
also yet be found to inhabit the county.
CHEIROPTERA
1. Greater Horseshoe Bat. Rhinolophus
ferrum-equinum, Schreber.
Said by Sterland to have occurred in Sher-
wood Forest many years ago, and Mr. J.
Whitaker reports it from Rainworth. Fur-
ther confirmation is however required before
we can definitely claim this southern species
as a Notts bat.
2. Lesser Horseshoe Bat. Rhinolophus hippo-
sideros, Bechstein.
Only known to occur in the county from
a specimen picked up dead some years ago at
Edwinstowe by Mr. J. R. Hardy of the Man-
chester Museum.
3. Long-eared Bat. Plecotus auritus, Linn.
This appears to be one of our common
species. I have seen specimens captured in
Nottingham, Mr. Whitaker reports it from
Rainworth, and it is said by Sterland to be
abundant in Sherwood Forest.
4. Noctule or Great Bat. Piphtrellus noctula,
Schreb.
Bell — Scotophilus noctula.
This fine species is common about Not-
tingham, and is sometimes found hybernating
in numbers in the roofs of factories.
5. Pipistrelle. Pipistrelluspipistrellus^chreber.
Bell — Scotophilus pipistrellus.
Recorded from several districts and prob-
ably common in the county, although few
specimens have actually come under my
notice.
6. Natterer's Bat. Myotis nattereri, Kuhl.
Bell — Vespertilio nattereri.
A specimen was picked up dead at Grove
near Retford in June, 1888, by Mr. L. Buttress
(Zoologist, 1892, p. 144).
INSECTIVORA
7. Hedgehog. Erinaceus europteus, Linn.
Generally distributed and common in spite
of the relentless persecution to which it is
subject at the hands of gamekeepers.
8. Mole. Talpa europeea, Linn.
Abundant everywhere. A cream-coloured
form occurs occasionally.
9. Common Shrew. Sorex araneus, Linn.
Common in the Nottingham district, and
would doubtless be found to be equally so
elsewhere if looked for.
IO. Water Shrew. Neomys fodiens, Pallas.
Bell — Crosiopus fodiens.
Apparently not common about Nottingham,
but has been seen at Colwick, Lenton and
Beeston. Mr. Whitaker says that it frequents
the Rainworth Water, but is rare. In north
Notts Mr. L. Buttress has taken it at Grove
and Headon, together with the variety formerly
distinguished as the oared shrew (N. remifer).
A specimen of the latter, killed at Annesley,
is in Mr. J. Whitaker's collection.
CARNIVORA
[Wild Cat. Felts catus, Linn.
I have been unable to find any documentary
evidence of the occurrence of the wild cat in
Nottinghamshire, but as its remains occur in
both the Pleistocene and Recent deposits in
theCreswell caves on the borders of Sherwood
Forest, it doubtless once inhabited the dense
woods which formerly covered this region.]
[Wolf. Cants lupus, Linn.
Common in Sherwood Forest as late as the
fifteenth century at least.]
11. Fox. fulpes vulpes, Linn.
Bell — Vulpes vulgaris.
Common throughout the county owing to
its preservation for purposes of sport.
12. Pine Marten. Mustela martes, Linn.
Bell — Martes abietum.
The Rev. W. Becher of Wellow possesses
an example which was killed at Winkburn
near Southwell about 1850, and two specimens
in the Nottingham Museum were captured
on the Worksop Manor estate about 1872.
178
MAMMALS
Bones of the pine marten occur in the Recent
deposits in the caves at Creswell Crags, so
that it was probably a regular denizen of the
forest-clad district of Notts, but doubtless is
now extinct.
13. Polecat. Putorius putorius. Linn.
Bell — Mustela putorius.
Possibly still survives in the county, but if
so is verging upon extinction. In 1875, ac-
cording to Sterland, it still held its ground in
Sherwood Forest, and as recently as January,
1891, a fine male was captured alive there
(L. Buttress in Zoologist, 1891, p. 424). Mr.
Whitaker writes me that the last polecat seen
at Rainworth occurred about 1876. Mr. W.
Rose of Nottingham has seen specimens which
were taken at Beeston and East Bridgford ;
one was killed near Colwick Hall about
1871-2, and two specimens at Bingham about
1887. Remains of the polecat have been
found in the Pleistocene and Recent deposits
in the Creswell caves.
14. Stoat. Putorius ermineus, Linn.
Bell — Mustela erminea.
Very common throughout the county.
Examples in winter dress are frequently seen,
and Mr. Buttress records (Zoologist, 1892, p.
310) that a great many white and pied indi-
viduals were shot in the neighbourhood of
Grove in the winter of 1891—2, one as late
as 28 May. A pure white stoat was seen at
Thurgarton on 26 January, 1898.
15. Weasel. Putorius nivalis, Linn.
Bell — Mustela vulgarii.
Abundant and generally distributed in the
county.
1 6. Badger. Meles me/es, Linn.
Bell — Meles taxus.
The badger is not so rare in Nottingham-
shire as is generally supposed, but owing to its
shyness and nocturnal habits is not often seen.
Mr. J. Whitaker, writing in January, 1898,
says : ' Badgers are got nearly every winter at
Annesley Park, and a few years back two
were taken at Newstead.' The Field for
5 January, 1889, records a specimen captured
on the Aspley Hall estate near Nottingham.
The steep right bank of the Trent, where
well wooded, as at Kneeton, Clifton and
Thrumpton, has yielded several examples in
recent years, e.g. at Clifton Grove two were
seen on 1 8 May, 1893, one °f which was
killed and is now in the Nottingham Museum;
and one was captured at Thrumpton on
9 March, 1898, and sold alive to a Nottingham
publican. Five badgers were killed at Bunny
in the late autumn of 1897; an adult male
was run down by a pack of foxhounds at
Thurgarton on 17 January, 1898 ; and a pair
were caught at Plumtree about the beginning
of March, 1900. There is a stuffed specimen
in the collection of the Rev. W. Becher at
Wellow, which was killed at Fiskerton a few
years ago. If protected from useless and
wanton destruction this interesting and prac-
tically harmless animal would doubtless become
fairly common.
Bones of the badger have been found in
the Recent deposits in the Creswell caves, and
the animal — under its old name of ' brock ' —
apparently gave its title to the Broxtowe
(anciently Brockstowe) estate near Nottingham.
17. Otter. Lutra lutra, Linn.
Bell — Lutra vulgaris.
Sterland in 1875 (White's Worksop, etc.)
stated that the otter occurred at intervals in
some of the streams in Sherwood Forest, but
neither the Rev. W. Becher nor Mr. Whitaker
has heard of its occurrence there. The latter
writes (under date 14 January, 1898): 'The
only otters I have heard of were in the willow
beds at Basford some fifteen years ago. I
often wonder, with the large quantity of
water and lots of fish, we don't have them
here.'
The records of its occurrence in the Trent
are fairly numerous, and I have notes of its
having been captured or seen within compara-
tively recent years at Clifton (several), Wilford,
Colwick, Farndon, East Stoke, South Colling-
ham, etc. F. B. Whitlock (Naturalist, 1895,
p. 329) gives the following instances of its oc-
currences in the Nottinghamshire part of the
river Soar : one near Stanford-on-Soar about
1869; one near Zouch Mills — an exceptionally
large male — a few years ago ; a lair with two
old otters and two or more young ones found
on an island in the Soar in November, 1894 ;
four more, two old and two young, seen in the
same place in August, 1895. The late Mr.
Lockwood of Aspley Hall near Nottingham
possessed an otter which was trapped in the
Aspley Woods some years ago.
The following paragraph appeared in the
Nottingham Daily Express of 7 December,
1895 : 'A "dog" otter of a large size was
shot in the Greet, in the parish of Upton, the
other afternoon by Mr. Kinder of Upton
Mills. The animal was in beautiful con-
dition, and when weighed turned the scale at
34 Ib. These animals are now becoming
very rare in the district, though they were
formerly very frequently met with in the
neighbourhood of the little river Greet, well
known to anglers for its excellent trout fish-
ing.'
179
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
RODENTIA
1 8. Squirrel. Sciurus leucourus, Kerr.
Bell — Sciurus vulgaru.
Common in woods and parks throughout
the county.
[Beaver. Castor fiber. Linn.
No remains of this animal appear to have
been found in the county, and the only reason
for supposing that it ever occurred rests upon
the name of a village — Bevercotes — in north
Notts, which is supposed to have derived its
name from the existence of the beaver in that
neighbourhood at some former period.]
19. Dormouse. Muscardinus avellanarius,
Linn.
Bell — Myoxus avellanarius.
' As to Nottinghamshire, Mr. J. Whitaker
of Rainworth Lodge near Mansfield writes
me that notwithstanding numerous inquiries
he can only hear of its existence in one locality
(a wood near Worksop), where there are two
colonies ' (G. T. Rope, Zoologist, June, 1885,
ix. 207).
20. Harvest Mouse. Mus minutus, Pallas.
Probably now rare in the county. The
only record I have is of several mice and a
nest seen by W. Rigby of the Nottingham
Museum, in a field near the Eastcroft, Not-
tingham, a good many years ago.
2 1 . Wood Mouse, or Long-tailed Field Mouse.
Mus sylvaticus, Linn.
Common in the Nottingham district and
doubtless elsewhere. Mr. Whitaker reports
it from Rainworth.
22. House Mouse. Mus musculus, Linn.
Here, as elsewhere, an abundant pest.
23. Brown Rat. Mus decumanus, Pallas.
As the preceding.
24. Field Vole. Microtus agrestis, Linn.
Bell — Arvuola agrestis.
Rainworth (Whitaker), and no doubt com-
mon elsewhere.
25. Water Vole. Microtus amphibius, Linn.
Bell — Arvuola amphibius.
Very common in all suitable situations.
Mr. T. M. Blagg tells me that his father fre-
quently saw individuals of the black variety
on the banks of a stream in Langford parish,
in the 'fifties ' and ' sixties' of the last century.
Remains of the water vole occur in the Pleis-
tocene and Recent deposits in the caves at
Creswell Crags.
\
26. Bank Vole. Evotomys glareo/us, Schreber.
Bell — Arvicola glareolus.
Common in the only place in the county
where I have placed traps for field mice, viz.
Colwick Park near Nottingham. No doubt
this and the field vole would be found to be
widely distributed if sought for.
27. Hare. Lepus europ&us, Pallas.
Bell — Lepus ttmidus.
Very common ; white, pied and sandy varie-
ties are occasionally seen. Bones of the hare
have been found in the Pleistocene and Recent
deposits in the Creswell caves.
28. Rabbit. Lepus cuniculus, Linn.
Occurs in great abundance throughout the
county, and its bones occur in the Recent
deposits in the caves at Creswell Crags.
UNGULATA
[Wild Boar. Sus scrofa, Linn.
Remains of this animal were found in the
Recent deposits in the Creswell caves.]
29. Red Deer. Cervus elaphus, Linn.
The red deer was once common in Sher-
wood Forest, but has long since disappeared
in a wild state, although it exists in a semi-
domesticated condition in Welbeck Park,
where in 1892 there was a herd of 130 and
14 white ones; at Thoresby Park in the
same* year there were 24, and at Wollaton
Park 31. (The numbers are from Whit-
aker's Deer Parks and Paddocks of England,
1892.)
30. Fallow Deer. Cervus aama, Linn.
Introduced into the following parks (num-
bers from Whi taker's Deer Parks and Paddocks
of England, corrected to date) : Thoresby Park,
about 630; Welbeck Park, 360 and a herd
of 130 white ones ; Wollaton Park, 105 ;
Annesley Park, 200 ; Ruffbrd Park, 300 to
350; Rainworth Park, 26; Highfield Park,
IO; Chauntry House Park, 10.
[Roe Deer. Capreolus capreolus, Linn.
Bones have been found in the Recent de-
posits in the caves at Creswell Crags.]
[Wild Cattle. Bos taurus, Linn.
Wild white cattle existed in Wollaton Park
until the beginning of the last century.
'They were polled or hornless, with black
noses and black ears, and were known as the
" old park herd," a name denoting some an-
180
MAMMALS
tiquity. Between 1800 and 1835 the herd
became reduced by an accident when fourteen
died from eating dead branches of yew cut
from trees near the hall. The survivors,
showing no tendency to breed, were killed
off ' (Whitaker, Deer Parks, etc.).
Wild cattle also existed in Annesley Park,
as the following extract from a letter from
Lord Chaworth to the Countess of Rutland
shows (the letter is dated 'Annesley, 4 August,
1669 ') : ' I have made boulde to present your
Ladyship a small taste off a White wild Oxe
frome my Parke, killed by my owne hand.
I had not presumed so much but that I have
heard my Lord off Rutland saye they were
originally his att Beskewood Park from
whence I had that breed' (Whitaker, Deer
Parks, etc.).
Remains of wild cattle occur in the Cres-
well cave deposits.]
CETACEA
3 1 . Porpoise. Phocaena phocaena, Linn.
Bell — Pkoccena communis.
Occurs very frequently in the tidal portion
of the Trent and occasionally ascends the
river to a much higher point. Mr. T. M.
Blagg of Newark writes to me : ' It is no in-
frequent event for a small school to come up
the Trent as high as Collingham, and I must
have heard of their being seen on some half-
dozen occasions at least during the past ten
or twelve years. The most noteworthy in-
stance, however, was in 1880 when, the river
being in flood, a school of five crossed the
weir in the canal just below Newark, and
coming up past the town, were hunted with
guns and boats in the mill-tail, one being
actually captured in the locks.'
A specimen which measured 4 ft. 6 inches
in length was shot in the Trent at Kelham
near Newark on 26 March, 1903, and was
exhibited for some days in a fish shop in
Newark. The Newark Herald of 28 March,
in recording the event, stated that five or six
were killed in the Trent near Collingham
about five years ago.
ADDENDA
3. Long-eared Bat. Plecotus auritus, Linn.
Specimens have occurred recently in the
Worksop and Retford districts, and about
Nottingham and Eastwood.
5. Pipistrelle. Pipistrellus pipistrellus, Schreb.
Common everywhere in the Worksop
district (J. T. Houghton).
10. Water Shrew. Neomys fodiens, Pallas.
Seen in the stream in Shireoaks Park near
Worksop, 2 July, 1904, by Rev. A. Thornley.
I Off. Pigmy Shrew. Sorex minutus, Linn.
In the Zoologist for May, 1904, Mr. J.
Whitaker records a specimen captured at
Rainworth Lodge near Mansfield during the
previous month. It was brought into the
house by a cat, and had doubtless been
captured in the grounds of the Lodge or in
its immediate vicinity.
1 6. Badger. Meles mcles, Linn.
Two killed in Nottinghamshire by the
Earl of Harrington's hounds in September,
1904 : one in Edwalton Top Cover, the
other in Epperstone Park. Has been seen
recently at Shireoaks and elsewhere near
Worksop ; while not long ago a litter of
young badgers was found at Gringley-on-the-
Hill.
17. Otter. Lutra /utra, Linn.
On 3 March, 1905, a very fine example
was shot in the canal at Hickling. It
measured 47 in. from nose to end of tail, the
tail itself being 19 in. long. Now in the
local collection in the Nottingham Natural
History Museum. Mr. J. T. Houghton re-
ports two recent occurrences in the Worksop
district.
181
EARLY MAN
IT is proposed in this article to trace the history of man from his
earliest appearance in the county to the moment when definite
records begin.1 For the performance of this task, we have to rely
upon the tokens of his presence : here and there the skeletons of
his dead, but more often implements and weapons of bone and stone and
bronze, or again and more doubtfully the shaping of huge stones and of
caverns. By a happy accident the stalagmites of the Creswell Caves have
sealed up the successive deposits of human and animal remains. They
thus furnish us with a rough calendar of the earliest times which, with
the help of the geologist and palaeontologist, it is possible to decipher.
There is yet another measure of the lapse of time. The anthropologist
marks off the successive stages of advancing civilization, as man passes
from the use of rough stone tools and weapons to polished stones, and
again from stone to metal, first bronze, and then iron. It follows that
our measure of time is very different from that of the historian who is
helped by definite records. Instead of years we deal with geological
periods and with ages of culture. We have to be satisfied with a bare
register of succession : with saying that such and such objects come before,
or at the same time with, or after, other objects. Moreover the stages
of development overlap. Notably is this the case as man passes from
the use of stone to the use of metals. The finest stone tools were wrought
when man had already become familiar with the working of bronze. It
will be convenient, however, to consider the stone implements together
before we pass to the Bronze Age, although many of the stone imple-
ments belong to the Bronze Age. We begin with the Old Stone Age,
or palaeolithic man : then we shall consider the New Stone Age or
neolithic man : and lastly the Bronze Age, which will bring us to the
coming of the Romans and the dawn of history.
The county of Nottingham is not rich in pre-historic remains, but
possesses them in sufficient variety to illustrate the life of early man. Our
poverty in this respect is somewhat exaggerated owing to the lack of local
antiquarian research. No one, for example, has done for Nottingham-
shire what Bateman did for Derbyshire, and every year removes some
landmark or memorial of the past. Hence the following pages are an
indication of work yet to be done, as well as an attempt to sum up the
results which are already ascertained.8
1 See index at the end of this article.
* I have to acknowledge gratefully the assistance which has been generously given me in preparing
this description. The officers and many of the members of the Thoroton Society have taken great pains
for me ; my colleague, Prof. Carr, has also helped me much.
I83
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
THE PALAEOLITHIC AGE
A line drawn from the Dee to the Humber seems to mark a limit
beyond which palaeolithic man rarely passed. Scarcely any instances are
recorded of palaeolithic implements being found even as far north as the
now famous Creswell Caves. The Rev. J. M. Mello began the explora-
tion of these caves in 1875 along with Professor Boyd Dawkins, and it
was at once clear that the discoveries made there were very important for
the early history of man.
The Creswell Crags line the two sides of a beautiful ravine which
marks the boundary between the counties of Nottingham and Derby.
The crags are of magnesian limestone. By the percolation of water
along the joints of this rock, dissolving away its soluble constituents,
passages have been slowly formed and gradually enlarged into caverns.
Of these caverns the greater part are on the Derbyshire side of the ravine.
But one of the chief of them, which is known as the Church Hole Cave,
is upon the southern or Nottinghamshire side. On digging through the
cave bottom, there were found the following strata of deposits : first a super-
ficial layer at the entrance of the cave, lying upon the stalagmite ; this
contained remains of the late Bronze Age : second, stalagmitic breccia in
places and beneath it an accumulation of earth and sand with clay ; the
implements found were of bone, antler, and flint : third and lowest was a
layer of red sand which contained rough implements of quartzite. The
animal remains which accompanied the implements in the two lower
layers show that we have here relics of two successive occupations of
palaeolithic man in the late Pleistocene Age.1
At the time of these occupations the great Ice Age was already a
thing of the past. The ice cap was retreating northwards, although the
scanty traces of human occupation seem to show that it still covered the
northern part of the island, or rather, we should say, the northern part
of what is now Great Britain. For the British Isles were not yet formed,
so different was the distribution of land and sea from that of the present
time. The coast of Europe extended westward beyond the furthest shores
of Ireland, and northward beyond the Orkneys. The Thames was a mere
tributary of the Rhine, which flowed northward into a gulf of which
Norway marked the eastern side. This wild region was covered with
forests of oak and pine, through which there rose snow-capped ridges
having glaciers on their lower slopes. Here man contended with a
mingled host of arctic and southern animals : on the one hand, the bear,
mammoth, and reindeer ; on the other, the lion, the hyena, and the woolly
rhinoceros. For the bones of these animals are found in the caves of
Creswell along with the traces of man's presence. The rough tools and
weapons of the red sand show the extent of his skill in manufacture.
His civilization was at least as advanced as that of the Tasmanians, who
used similar weapons of stone when they came first into contact with
European settlers.3 As their experience increased and their skill developed,
1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Sac. xxxiii, 602 f. ' E. B. Tylor, Enc. Brit, xxv, 466.
184
EARLY MAN
these palaeolithic men passed to the more carefully finished implements
of flint and bone which were found at Creswell in the cave earth. Doubt-
less they were akin to the race of men who, in the same age, hunted the
reindeer and the horse in Switzerland and the south of France.
The diagram1 (seep. 191) will show the conditions under which the
discoveries were made in the Church Hole Cave. While the red sand
only furnished rough quartzite tools, the cave earth above yielded objects-
of bone, antler, and flint. These included (a) a well-shaped needle, abso-
lutely perfect, made out of the metacarpal or metatarsal bone of a
ruminant, (b] two bone awls fashioned out of the tibiae of a hare and
polished by long and continued use, (c) a broad fragment of bone rounded
at the end and with its edges notched, (d) two carefully rounded rods
made of antler, (e) various tools of flint and quartzite. The bone awls
and needles suggest that the cave-men wore skin clothing like that of the
modern Australians and Fuegians, or like the pre-historic inhabitants of
Egypt described by Professor Flinders Petrie.
The county is rich in caves other than those of Creswell. There
are some at Mansfield which have been used for dwellings up to now ;
and the city of Nottingham and its immediate neighbourhood are
honeycombed with hollows and openings in the rock. These have not
been explored systematically, but as far as may be learned there is nothing
to connect them with palaeolithic man. It will be most convenient to
consider them at the end of this article.
THE NEOLITHIC AGE
A long interval of time elapsed between the Palaeolithic Age and
the appearance of neolithic man. England no longer formed part of the
European continent, but was separated from it by the English Channel.
The abruptness of the transition from the Old Stone Age to the New Stone
Age suggests that some great cataclysm must have taken place by which
in England at least palaeolithic man was swept away, or driven out before
the arrival of his successor. The new comers were acquainted with many
of the arts upon which developed civilization was to rest. They were
not only hunters, but fishermen and miners. They had begun to culti-
vate the earth, and to breed domestic cattle. They had even begun to
make pottery. And towards the end of this period they had learned to
shape huge stones into monuments of the dead, and perhaps temples for
worship. Recent excavation seems to show that Stonehenge itself marks
the close of the New Stone Age. If we may compare palaeolithic man
to backward races, such as the Eskimo in the north, or the bushmen of
Africa, neolithic man is not only illustrated by, but is actually represented
by, the Iberians who inhabited these islands before the arrival of the
Celt, and whose descendants are still distinguishable in the populations of
the western coasts of Europe, notably in the Basques of the Spanish
peninsula. For it is more than probable that the dark-skinned type of
1 Fig. i, from Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. xxxiii, opp. p. 588. By kind permission of Rev. J. M. Mello.
I 185 24
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
man which is more prevalent towards the west both of England and
Ireland, or in other words the Iberian inhabitants of these isles, are
descended from the neolithic men. The fusion of types in the county
is almost complete, but there are still visible traces of the darker race.
Hence we may be permitted to see in the scanty neolithic remains of
the county a legacy from the remote forefathers of some of the present
inhabitants.
The advance that we have already traced in the manufacture of his
tools by palaeolithic man was continued in the period which we are now
considering. The roughly sharpened flakes of flint which were found at
Creswell are succeeded by well-wrought arrow-heads and knives. No
sure line can be drawn between the late Stone Age and the age of
bronze. And, indeed, most of the finer stone implements of the county
have been found in the neighbourhood of Celtic burial grounds, and in
conjunction with bronze objects.
The more important neolithic implements found in Nottingham-
shire include chipped flint arrow-heads found at Gunthorpe ; and ground
or polished flint celts from Averham, Car Colston, Carlton, and Notting-
ham. At Bestwood, North Clifton, Scarthing Moor, and Wiverton
neolithic implements have also been found.
The fluted and perforated axe-head found at the Sand Hills,
Wollaton, and the fragment of another perforated axe-head, including its
cutting end found at Beeston, are both probably more nearly related to
the age of bronze than that of stone. The same may be said of the
specimen of holed axe-head dredged from the bed of the Trent near
Barton and the holed stone hammer-head from Thrumpton.
Some human remains were found at South Muskham along with
rough fragments of earthenware and reindeer bones. These belong
probably to a time preceding the coming of the Celtic invaders, that is
to the age which we are now considering. But when stone objects are
found along with bronze objects, we have already passed into another
stage of civilization. For example, Bateman found a flint spear-head
along with articles of bronze at Gotham.1 And the ' well-finished celt of
polished stone' which was found at Collingham in 1867 seems to have
belonged to a British burial ground.2
There are one or two striking natural objects in the county which
may be associated with some reason with the close of the Stone Age.
This time was characterized, as we have seen, by the erection or use of
huge stones, and reached its culmination in Stonehenge. There is some
reason to think that the Hemlock Stone on Stapleford Hill, and the
Druid Stones of Blidworth, were centres of religious interest even in
neolithic times.
The Hemlock Stone is a pillar of sandstone which, owing to the
insoluble nature of the cementing material, barium sulphate, has resisted
the weather to a greater degree than the surrounding rock, and so
has, by degrees, been left standing out amid the slow decay of the rest
1 Vestiges, 104. ' Wake, CoKngham, 43.
186
PERFORATED AXE-HEAD FROM WOLLATON.
WINGED CELT FROM COLWICK.
BRONZE SOCKKTED SPEAR-HEAD
FROM (jRINGLKY.
BRONZE IMPLEMENTS FROM NOTTINGHAM.
To face page 186.
EARLY MAN
of the hill-side.1 The rock itself reveals no trace of human handiwork ;
but long standing custom seems to connect the Hemlock Stone with
those ancient days in which the miracle of fire was still celebrated. The
use of lighting the sacred fire seems to have continued down to the
beginning of the nineteenth century. This lighting took place on
Beltane eve each year upon the top of the Hemlock Stone, according to
Dr. Timothy Spencer Hall, and old people in his young days could
remember and describe the celebration.*
At Blidworth in a hollow to the west of the village are some
masses of Bunter conglomerate, which stand out above the level of the
fields. They remind us of the Hemlock Stone, and like it, are connected
by tradition with the pre-Roman past, under the name of Druid Stones.
The largest of them rests upon a knob of rock which juts a little above
the soil ; it has been hollowed from the western side for a distance of
about six feet into the interior of the mass. The hollow is pierced
through at the back in such a way that, it is said, the aperture exactly
faces the sun on the morning of Midsummer Day. Thus we are again
pointed, as in the Beltane usage on Stapleford Hill, to rites in which
reverence for the sun played a leading part. The hole through the
largest mass at Blidworth is to be compared with the numerous holed
stones which have been recorded in many quarters. And doubtless the
men who hollowed out the western side of Blidworth Stone made a
practice of passing either human beings or their possessions through the
narrow opening at the back, but with what purpose it is now impossible
to say.3
THE BRONZE AGE
The use of metals was brought to these islands by the advanced
guard of the great Indo-European invasion, which, spreading from the
east of the European continent, pressed westward and southward, driving
before it the men who were already settled. The Celts, with their weapons
of bronze, expelled or subdued to themselves the darker neolithic
inhabitants of England, leaving them to take refuge in the extreme
west, in Cornwall, Cumberland, and Wales. Compared with their
enemies, the Celts were fair-haired, ruddy and tall, differing very little
from the Germans and Anglo-Saxons. Huxley indeed affirms that the
people termed Gauls, and those called Germans by the Romans, did not
differ in any important character.4 It is impossible to say with anything
like precision by how long an interval the coming of the Celts preceded
the Christian era. Probably it was by a period of not less than a
thousand years. Since the Celts formed one of the earliest offshoots from
the Aryan stock, they displayed a more primitive form of constitution
than their brethren who emigrated at a later period. Each tribe, or
rather each local settlement, formed a political unit which was very
1 This is the opinion of Prof. J. W. Carr.
' Old Nottinghamshire, ed. by J. P. Briscoe, p. 51 ; Notts, and Derb. Notes and Queries, \, 76, 100.
* Baring-Gould, Strange Survivals, 268 ; Notts, and Derb. Notes and Queries, ii, 1 16 ; iii, 88.
4 Man's Place in Nature, 257.
I87
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
loosely connected with the other similar tribes or settlements. For
example, the settlement upon the rising ground which surrounds St.
Mary's Church at Nottingham would not be very closely bound to the
neighbouring settlement upon Calverton Hill.1 On the other hand
the tie which united the inhabitants of any single village was very
close, most of the land being held in common by the whole community.
Hence it is that the civilization of the Celts exhibits such a curious
mixture of what is primitive, and what is highly developed. They
lacked what the Romans enjoyed through their stricter national organiza-
tion. But, on the other hand, the very intensity of the clan life of the
Celts furnished more frequent exercise for the inspiration of their poets
and artists. The Celtic love of music is symbolized for us in the harp-
shaped brooch which was found at Creswell. Their power of design may
be more doubtfully traced in the mouldings of the bronze objects which
we shall now have to enumerate.
We have followed the development of stone implements from the
rude quartzite lumps which were found in the lowest stratum at Creswell,
to the finely finished tools which were still used in the Bronze Age.
We pursue a similar line of advance as we come first upon the flat bronze
adze or axe which is a copy in metal of the most elaborate stone
weapons ; secondly, upon the palstave, consisting of a long axe-shaped
piece of bronze, with flanged edges in order to grip the wooden handle,
the handle being split to receive the palstave. In the third stage the
celt was made hollow so as to receive the end of the wooden handle entire,
and was often furnished with a loop through which a thong was passed,
in order the better to secure the handle to the head. In the Castle
Museum, Nottingham, is a transitional form, a looped palstave.
We will now consider in order the discoveries of bronze objects
which have taken place within the county : —
A hoard of bronze objects of a most important character was discovered
in the course of some building operations at Great Freeman Street,
Nottingham, in 1860. The objects, which were exhibited at a meeting
of the Society of Antiquaries of London8 on 21 February, 1861, by
Mr. Thomas Close, F.S.A., comprised : sixteen socketed and looped
celts, one palstave, four socketed spear-heads, one knife with flat tang, six
fragments of swords, one long ferrule gj inches long, a fragment of a quad-
rangular tube, and what was described as ' part of a circular ornament.'
The accumulation of a number of perfect and imperfect articles of bronze
in one spot is of great interest. All the fragments were found quite close
together buried in the sandy soil at a depth of 3 ft. 6 in. from the
surface. These were evidently buried in the earth for safety, and they
doubtless represent the hoard, possibly all the wealth, of some individual
who knew the commercial value of bronze.
The fragments of swords are suggestive. There are many instances
on record of the discovery of several short sections of bronze swords which
have apparently been broken up purposely into convenient lengths for
1 Wright, Celt. Rom. and Sax. nz. ' Prix. Soc. Antij. Lond. and Ser. vol. i, pp. 332-333.
188
EARLY MAN
re-casting or for secret burial in the earth. The weapon having been
worn out by use, or damaged beyond repair, became of no use except for
melting up and re-casting. The presence of socketed and looped celts and
socketed spear-heads, as well as the ferrule, indicates a fairly late stage in
the Bronze Age. The ornamental character of the palstave and celts
points to the same conclusion. Some of the objects found in this hoard
are now in the museum at Nottingham Castle, others are in the Notting-
ham Natural History Museum, and others are in private possession.
Another interesting hoard of Bronze Age antiquities was found some
years ago at Newark and passed into the fine collection of Canon Green-
well. They comprise: (i) two bronze discs 5J inches in diameter,
pierced with a hole in the centre, with a raised rib round their margins,
and with a cone-like rising or projection in the middle ; (2) socketed
celts ; and (3) a broad socketed spear-head.
Several objects were found in Nottingham during the excavations for
the Theatre Royal, including, I am told, a bronze celt, a bronze spear-
head, and a sword-blade of iron.1 Three spear-heads are said to have been
dug up in Nottingham when the workmen were excavating for the
Grantham Canal.3
Sir John Evans possesses a fine winged celt found in the gravel of
the Trent at Colwick, near Nottingham. Immediately below the stop,
the blade is fluted, and the bottom of the fluting tapers somewhat in the
contrary direction to the tapering of the blade.3 It is a singularly hand-
some and effective implement.
Another fine bronze object found in this county was the socketed
and fluted spear-head discovered in 1803 in the course of some drainage
works at Gringley. A drawing of the spear-head, exhibited at a meeting
of the Society of Antiquarians of London on 9 January, 1806, has been
engraved and published in Arcbceologia, vol. xvi, Plate LIV, fig. I.
The small bronze pin found at Gotham in association possibly with
an interment, and accompanied by a neatly chipped spear-head of flint,
furnishes an interesting illustration of that overlapping of stone and metal
tools or weapons of which prehistoric archaeology affords many instances.
Some bronze objects seem to have been found with traces of crema-
tion. For example, there were found at Combes near Southwell towards
the end of the eighteenth century two socketed celts which when
discovered appeared to be buried in a bed of ashes.4 In 1836 workmen
excavating along the Fosse Road, near Newark, found urns placed about
2 ft. to 2 ft. 6 in. from the surface, and with them a pair of scissors
much oxidized, and pottery probably of British manufacture.6 When
Major Rooke opened the barrow near Oxton an urn of iron half full of
ashes, a sword in its scabbard, and fifteen glass beads were found.6
Our history ends as it began with the Church Hole Cave of Cres-
well. The civilization of the Bronze Age came with the Celts and
1 Information supplied by Mr. W. Rigby. ' Orange, Hut. ofNott. i, 64.
' Evans, Bronze Imp. 77. * Dickinson, Southwell, 298.
5 Cornelius Brown, Annals of Newark, 4. ' Throsby, TAoroton (1797), vol. ii, 176.
189
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
ended when they were conquered by the Saxons. The Britons, as they
fled before the invaders, took refuge in hiding places and fastnesses, and
for a passing moment occupied the caves which their neolithic pre-
decessors had haunted. Some such company, perhaps, taking refuge in
the ravine of Creswell, has left behind at the entrance to the Church Hole
Cave the ashes of its fires and a few objects of use or ornament. Among
them a bronze brooch in the form of a harp is especially noteworthy.
There were also found ' a bone awl, a square polished bone like a die cut
in half, ornamented with circles on all sides but one, numerous fragments
of grey lathe-turned Romano-British ware, a fragment of a whetstone, a
black flint strike-a-light.' l
If the above account is correct, these objects belong to the end of
the British period, but it is possible that we are dealing with a burial place,
such as those which line the Fosse Road out of Newark. The presence
of the ashes, of human bones, of pottery, of personal ornaments, is,
perhaps, more easily explained in this way than by supposing that the
caves were occupied as dwellings.
The circular ornament upon the die is an interesting trace of a
familiar Celtic decoration, and anticipates the favourite geometrical
motive of the Irish illuminators of manuscripts.
THE CAVES OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Now that we have surveyed the course of prehistoric time as far as
our somewhat scanty resources will permit, we can take up a problem
which has much interested local antiquaries, namely, the age of the
caves which are found at various places in the county. In addition to
the caves of Creswell, there are some rock surfaces which have been
hollowed out and used as dwellings in the neighbouring town of Mans-
field. They are towards the top of the rise leading from the town in
the direction of Southwell. The same sandstone formation presents in
Nottingham and its neighbourhood an opportunity for numerous excava-
tions. The northern escarpment of the Trent on both sides of the
Castle Rock has been honeycombed with dwellings and hollows of
various kinds.2 Some of these caves are probably as old as Roman times,
or even older ; but the evidence for their antiquity is meagre, and in the
end reduces itself to a passage in Asser, in which the historian gives the
British name of Nottingham as Tignocobauc, and translates it ' dwellings
of caves.'8 But the Britons themselves dwelt by preference in hill
settlements, and although it is believed by some that the Druids some-
times taught in caves, this was a special custom, and does not prove a
common usage. In view of all this we cannot ascribe a very early
origin to the excavations in the church cemetery at Nottingham.*
1 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. xxxiii, 603 ff.
' Trans. Thonton Soc. (1897), 37 ; Notts, and Derb. Notes and Queries, vi, 17, 35.
3 Guest, Origines Celticae, i, 360 ; Notts, and Derb. Notes and Queries, ii, 87.
4 Oliver, Shadows Departed, 13.
igo
EARLY MAN
INDEX AND SUMMARY
ASLOCKTON. — Stone hatchet : communicated by Rev. J. Standish.
AVERHAM FLASH. — Axe-head of polished flint : described by Mr. Blagg.
BARTON. — Holed axe-head : Natural History Museum, Nottingham.
BEESTON. — Cutting end of stone axe-head [Evans, Stone Imp. 210].
Bronze sword found in pond at Highfield ; Castle Museum, Nottingham.
BESTWOOD. — Neolithic implements : Castle Museum, Nottingham.
CAR COLSTON. — Polished stone axe : Mr. T. M. Blagg's collection.
Bronze spear-head : described by Mr. Blagg.
CARLTON. — Stone hatchet {Notts, and Derb. Notes and Queries, ii, 123] : Mr. Whitbread's collection.
COLWICK. — Bronze palstave [Evans, Bronze Imp. 77].
COLLINGHAM. — Stone celt [Wake, Cottingham, 43].
COMBES. — Two bronze socketed celts [Dickinson, Southwell, 298].
CRESWELL. — Palaeolithic, neolithic, bronze implements : Museum, Owens College, Manchester ; Derby
Museum [Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. xxxiii, 602 f.].
GOTHAM. — Neolithic implement [Evans, Bronze Imp. 1 90] ; bronze pin [ibid.].
GRINGLEY. — Bronze spear-head [Evans, Bronze Imp. 321 ; Arch, xvi, 361] ; stone implements in
Dr. Appleby's collection, Newark.
GUNTHORPE. — Flint arrow-head : Jewitt, Engl. Antiq. fig. 60.
HEXGRAVE. — Bronze celts [Stevenson, Bygone Notts. 42].
HOLME. — Bronze celts : in Colonel E. H. Nicholson's possession.
NEWARK. — Bronze hoard [Evans, Bronze Imp. 1 1 8] : Greenwell collection.
Flint arrow-head : British Museum.
NORTH CLIFTON. — Neolithic implement : Mr. C. Woolley's collection.
NORTH MUSKHAM. — Bronze celt : Castle Museum, Nottingham.
NOTTINGHAM. — Stone hatchet : Natural History Museum; bronze hoard, p. 1 88 ante [Evans, Bronze Imp.
1 18].
OXTON. — British burial place, p. 189 ante
SCARTHING MOOR. — Neolithic implement : recorded by Rev. A. Hunt, Wclton, Line.
SOUTH MUSKHAM. — Skull, rude earthenware vessels [Geologist, 1861, 349].
SOUTH SCARLE. — Bronze celt, stone celt [Wake, Collingham, 43].
THURGARTON. — Bronze celt : recorded by Rev. A. Hunt, Welton, Line.
THRUMPTON. — Holed stone hammer-head : Mr. Whitbread's collection.
TUXFORD. — Neolithic arrow-heads and celts [Evans, Stone Imp. 316].
WIVERTON. — Flint implement : Wiverton Hall.
WOLLATON PARK. — Neolithic implement [Evans, Stone Imp. 202].
WORKSOP. — Bronze celt : Osberton Hall.
Section of Church Hole Cave.
(31 Feet From Gate at entrance.) •
Ft in
1 • 0
1 0
1 8
to
2 • 0
2- 0
3 0
do00
Staltgmitic breccia
with charcoal , Flint implements & bones.
2 Reddish cavt earth,
similar remains .
, Lighter cave earth. ,
similar remains
Mottled cave earth ,
quartette i flint implements t tones .
Light reddish sandy earth t
Bones but no implements .
6 White calcareous sand * rock .
CRESWELL CAVES.
191
ll
3
<S>
CD
"i m
a)
^
g
L)
*3j
A
NH
c^_
<u
HM
o
h
O
,2
V
<M
W
^7
d
ccj
"
tj
to ^
^^
H
H
O °J
^•J
ANGLO-SAXON
REMAINS
OUR knowledge of the founders of England must to a great
extent be derived from their funeral customs and the array
of objects deposited in their graves. Apart from traditions
of the pagan period, which cannot be implicitly trusted,
there are indeed other sources of information not yet exhausted by
scientific inquiry ; and it will suffice to mention two in the field of
philology. In Nottinghamshire and the neighbouring counties place-
names are of special significance ; and the classical instance of North-
weorthig, which ranked among the Five Boroughs under the name of
Derby, indicates precisely enough the period during which the suffix -by
replaced the English -ham or -ton (tun] in certain parts of the country.
It is, however, with still earlier centuries that the present chapter deals,
the centuries that elapsed between the Roman domination and the con-
version of England to Christianity ; and for this period we can appeal
with still less confidence to another set of survivals, the dialectical varie-
ties that may still be plainly distinguished in many districts. In the
nature of things documentary evidence is here most inadequate, for only
in recent times have measures been taken to distinguish intonations by an
elaborate system of symbols, and year by year the material for such
inquiries is diminishing. The prospect for archaeology is more encourag-
ing. Though little has yet been done to classify or even to record in detail
relics recovered from the soil, it is incontestable that much remains to
be found, and there is every likelihood of more scrupulous and intelligent
excavation and treatment of antiquities in the future.
An attempt to present the history of Nottinghamshire before docu-
mentary records were contemplated can, in the present circumstances,
result in little more than a summary of the few discoveries available ; but
even thus some data may be rescued from oblivion, and the interest of
chance finds more fully appreciated. A glance at the map will reveal the
most striking physical features of the county, and at once account for the
restriction of early Anglo-Saxon sites to its southern and eastern areas.
An instructive comparison may be instituted with Sussex, where the
longer axis similarly divides what was once a desolate forest from the
fertile region that attracted the earliest settlers. The Sussex Weald
corresponds to Sherwood Forest that occupied nearly all the western half
of Nottinghamshire ; and in both cases the forest area is shown by the
Domesday record to have been still uninhabited at least six centuries after
the Teutonic invasions. The villa at Mansfield Woodhouse on the further
i 193 25
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
side, however, suggests that Sherwood did not baffle the Romans, who
also drove a road (Stane Street) through the Weald of Sussex.
At present it is impossible to bring forward conclusive evidence as
to the course followed by the earliest Teutonic immigrants into this
district ; but the view put forward by John Richard Green has everything
in its favour. A glance at his series of maps will explain, and in many
cases substantiate his statements, though here and there imagination may
too readily fill the void left by archaeology. If by the Engle (Angles)
be understood the tribe or tribes that at the date of their arrival, and for
some time longer, practised cremation and urn-burial, little exception can
be taken to his contention that ' their main settlement along the lower
Trent (in what is now the county of Nottingham) must have been in the
little dales that break the picturesque wold country that lies to the south
(or east) of the river, and through which they pushed along its course as
far as its junction with the Soar.'1 The map showing Anglo-Saxon sites at
the head of this chapter fully warrants this view, and physical reasons for
such distribution are not far to seek. ' The forest of Sherwood stretched
from the outskirts of our Nottingham ' northward within a short distance
of Southwell ' to a huge swamp into which the Trent widened as it
reached the Humber. Here, indeed, a thin line of clay-country remained
open on the left bank of the river, with lifts of soft sandstone here and
there ; and on the slopes of one of these the house of the Snotingas fixed
their home.' 3
The finds at Oxton and Tuxford, both of which may belong to the
sixth century, represent therefore in all probability the western limit of
the earliest Teutonic settlement of the lower Trent valley ; and the ques-
tion arises, Whence came these strangers from over-sea ? The answer
must depend on the final interpretation of their diverse funeral customs, of
which the traces are evident ; and the first step is to correlate the archaeo-
logical data in this and neighbouring areas. Of the latter only those now
known as Lincolnshire, Derbyshire, and Leicestershire are of importance, as
forest and swamp completed the circuit ; and it may be said at once that
there seems to have been, in the period now under discussion, an archaeo-
logical frontier 3 coinciding roughly with the upper courses of the
Warwickshire Avon and Welland. North of this line there is a marked
absence of a certain type of brooch that is characteristic of the southern
midlands, an area that in its turn is practically devoid of the large
square-headed variety represented by two examples in Nottinghamshire
itself.
As is generally the case north of the Thames, groups of burials with
or without cremation of the body have been discovered in the county ;
and it must be confessed at the outset that this discrepancy with regard
to a ceremony usually controlled by a rigid tradition, is at present
unexplained. It is true that in the Trent valley there is but little evidence
of a mixed cemetery in which burnt and unburnt burials occur side by
1 Making of England (1897), vol. i, p. 88.
1 V.C. H. Warw. i, 256 : Bucks, i, 196.
' Ibid. pp. 85, 88.
194
ANGLO-SAXON REMAINS
side, as for instance in Cambridgeshire ; and there is little to show
whether inhumation was for a time abolished in favour of cremation, or
whether the two rites were practised by contemporaries of different
tribal affinities in settlements distinct but not far removed from one
another. It should be remembered in this connexion that among the
Romans or Romanized provincials of Britain, cremation of the dead
seems to have passed out of fashion about the middle of the third
century of our era, more than half a century before the state recognition
of Christianity under Constantine ; so that it would be unwise to regard
the Teutonic cinerary urns of Nottinghamshire as the successors of the
Roman mortuary-ware that attained a high standard of quality. Com-
parison with continental discoveries justifies the attribution of these rude
hand-made urns to immigrants who came from the country bordering
the lower Elbe, or were at least akin to the tribes who settled in what
are to-day Schleswig-Holstein and Hanover.
There is in this county some slight indication that burials of the
unburnt body, that must still on account of their grave furniture be
referred to the pagan period, preserve the Roman tradition. They may
be those of the population that was left to its own
resources by the withdrawal of the Roman troops
and officials about the year 410 ; and, leaving the
cinerary urns for separate treatment, we may at
once proceed to an examination of a burial-ground
that was evidently in use during the fifth century.
A cemetery at Holme Pierrepont, three
miles east of Nottingham, was accidentally dis-
covered by labourers in 1842; but though various
articles are described and illustrated in the original
account,1 nothing is Said as to the interments. URN FROM HOLME PIERRKPONT.
It may, however, be concluded from the con-
dition of the relics found 2 ft. below the surface, that the burials were
not by way of cremation, and the skeletons had, perhaps, gone to decay,
though one urn is mentioned that may have contained calcined bones.
As remnants of the Roman civilization, may be mentioned part of a thin
yellow glass bowl, about six inches in diameter, with a raised inscription
of which the word Semper alone remains above a bird. Another drawing
represents a brooch in the form of a spotted animal that has a decidedly
Roman appearance. Though details were wanting, it was said that all
varieties of weapons and ornaments usually found in Saxon cemeteries
were here discovered in profusion. Two more urns are mentioned, and
one is illustrated ; but as they are described as smaller than the first,
there is nothing to show that they were cinerary, though they were
classed as such in 1858.* A quern about one foot in diameter, with part
of the iron spindle remaining, on which revolved an upper stone of bee-
hive form, may be compared with similar discoveries in graves at Winster,
Hartington, and Taddington in Derbyshire, and at Reading, Berkshire.
1 Journ. Brit. Arch. Asiac. iii, 297 ; see also Coll. Antij. ii, 228. ' W. M. Wylie, Arch, xxxvii, 471.
195
BRONZE-GILT BROOCH FROM
HOLME PIERREPONT.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
With the exception already noticed, the brooches were of well-known
Anglo-Saxon types, a gilt example of the square-headed variety, about
4! in. long, being illustrated (see fig.), and resembling specimens from the
northern midlands and eastern counties. As it
appears to have been enriched with seven settings
of stone or glass, the resemblance to one found
at St. Nicholas, near Warwick,1 is all the more
striking. This form of the square-headed brooch
belongs to the first half of the fifth century
here and in Scandinavia, and closely resembles one
from Kenninghall, Norfolk.' From among many
smaller brooches discovered at Holme Pierrepont
one with a trefoil head is illustrated (see fig.), and
belongs to a type represented in Northants.8 All
were of bronze, with iron pins, and present
evident traces of a woven fabric on the back,
indicating that they had been deposited with an
unburnt body in the grave. The buckles men-
tioned were probably quoit-shaped brooches such
as have been found in many parts of England.
Numerous glass beads of various forms and
colours, as well as one or two of rough amber,
are mentioned, and two larger ones had the
somewhat rare mosaic pattern, made in the same way as the millefiori
glass of the Roman period.
Some pieces of bronze that had apparently been riveted to the sides
of small bronze buckets for the attachment of handles were another
interesting item, as they probably belonged to a bowl with
three hooks for suspension, such as were found at Chester-
ton, Warwickshire.4 Circular enamelled plates are some-
times found which were attached to the side of the bowl
inside a frame of which the hook formed part ; but as there
is no mention of enamel here, the present example may have
resembled one from Hawnby, N. R. Yorkshire, in the
British Museum, which has plain attachments.
In 1839 a discovery of human burials was made in
the neighbourhood of Cotgrave and Normanton, immedi-
ately on the line of the Roman road known as the Fosse
Way, at a point about nineteen miles from Leicester and
about thirty from Lincoln. The following account was PIERREPONT.
communicated to the British Archaeological Association '
by Mr. Thomas Bateman some years later. Three skeletons were found
within a hundred yards, and a fourth about a quarter of a mile distant.
They were interred at full length in the line of the road (which here
1 V. C. H. Wano. i, 258, fig. 6 on plate : Akerman, Pag. Sax. rx, I.
1 r. C. H. Norfolk, i, 340, fig. 5. * V. C. H. Northanti, i, 243.
4 y. C. H. Wane, i, 258, figs. 8, 9, on plate. * Joum. iii, 297.
196
ANGLO-SAXON REMAINS
runs nearly north and south), and the graves had been cut through the
gravel and rubbish of which the road was made to the rock which lies
about two feet below the present surface. The workmen who made the
discovery agreed in stating that two spears were deposited with each body ;
these varied in length from eight to sixteen inches, and were composed
as usual of iron. It is probable that other remains, such as shield-bosses
and handles, escaped observation, but a ' third-brass ' coin of Carausius
(286-293) was found which serves to date the burials at any rate in one
direction. It is hardly possible that interments in the centre of the
highway were permitted in Roman times, and it is therefore reasonable
to refer these and another group found in the middle of the Watling Street,
near Bensford Bridge,1 to the fifth century, if not to the sixth of our era.
Another group of burials that cannot be dated in the same manner,
but had evidently some relation to the same great highway, was discovered
half a century ago at Norton, near Daventry, Northants.8 A bank forty or
fifty yards long and about three feet high ran parallel to, and just beyond,
the Roman embankment, being about twenty-five feet from the crown of
the road ; and several bodies, buried in a line, were found about six feet
below that level. A fine square-headed brooch s was found on a subse-
quent occasion when the bank was levelled to alter the course of the road.
In January, 1893, Mr. F. Pritchatt, while opening a new gravel-
pit in the Barnfield, Aslockton, came upon the remains of a warrior,
lying buried with his feet to the west, at a depth of 3^ ft. from the
surface. A straight two-edged sword, with a blade 29 in. long and 2 in.
wide, was found at the right of the body, pointing north-west, and a
lance-head, with a blade of 3 in. and a socket J in. shorter, lay near the
left foot. Other bones have been turned up on the site, and a bed of
gravel was a favourite position for an Anglo-Saxon burial-ground ; while
it is pointed out in the original account 4 that the orientation was not in
accordance with Christian usage. It may also be added that the reversed
spear is of rare occurrence in graves of the period in England,6 though
apparently the rule among the Ripuarian Franks.6 From measurements of
some of the bones it is evident that the stature of the living subject was about
five feet four inches, which is not by any means excessive for a warrior.
VIKING SWORD, FROM FARNDON CHURCH ( £ ).
Another sword (see fig.), of the Viking pattern, was found during
excavations below Farndon church, and was preserved in the vestry there.7
1 V. C. H. Warm, i, 253. ' V. C.H. Nortbants, i, 234 ; see also 236 (Passenham).
* Arch, xli, pi. xxii, p. 479.
4 Scarrington and Aslockton Parish Magazine, March, 1893 : the relics are in the possession of Capt.
Montagu Hall, ofWhatton Manor, who kindly furnished the account. Reproduced in Notts, and Derb.
Notes ana" Queries, 1893, p. 107 ; the skull is said to be brachycephalic, ibid. p. 122.
5 Long Wittenham, Berks., with stoup bearing biblical scenes, Arch, xxxviii, 345.
6 Proc. Soe. Antiq. Lond. iii, 34 : for an example see Boulanger's MoblRer funlraire Gallo-romain et
Franc, pi. 36. 'Cornelius Brown, Hist, of Newark (1904), i, 8.
197
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Its total length is 33! in., the guard being straight and the pommel
proportionately heavy ; but nothing of interest was found with it.
A somewhat disappointing discovery must here be noticed, as afford-
ing evidence of Anglo-Saxon burial just within the forest area of the
county ; and it is fortunate that the few antiquities discovered were illus-
trated at the time, for the description1 leaves much to be desired. In 1790
Major Hayman Rooke reported to the Society of Antiquaries the results
of his excavations in the previous year about a mile north of Oxton.
The smallest of three grave-mounds (tumult) within little more than half a
mile measured i 59 ft. in diameter, and consisted of very fine mould to
the depth of j\ ft., from the top to a little below the natural soil, where a
layer of grey sand mixed with clay, about five inches thick, was met with.
On this layer lay what was described as ' an urn (later found to be of
iron) half full of ashes, and covered with a piece of coarse baked earth,
which broke when taken up.' The engraving, rough as it is, proves this
to have been a shield-boss of ordinary Anglo-Saxon type, and the ashes
within it can have been nothing but the decayed remnants of the wooden
framework of the shield, which appears to have been uppermost. On
one side and at the bottom was a piece of wood adhering to the iron,
and several small pieces were found near it which were hollowed out,
and had evidently taken the curve of the boss ; hence it was inferred
that the boss had been deposited in the barrow in a wooden casing which
had in time become fixed to the metal by oxidation. Near this was
a sword in a wooden scabbard, 30 in. long and 4 in. broad, the breadth
applying no doubt more to the scabbard than the sword, which should
have measured about two inches from edge to edge. The sheathed sword
broke into seven pieces on being lifted from the earth, and the total
thickness where least decayed was above half an inch. ' Near the end of
the sword fifteen glass beads were picked up, some green, others clouded
with yellow, and some of a deep yellow.' The illustration of specimens
shows these to have been not beads but discs, with one flat and one
convex face, used apparently for gaming, as draughtsmen ; and it is
expressly stated that they were not perforated. Beads are an almost
invariable mark of a female interment, and the occurrence of these discs
with a sword perplexed the excavator ; but later discoveries have made
it clear that these draughtsmen were frequently placed in the graves of
warriors, and it will suffice to mention a bone set of twenty-eight, with
varying numbers of dots on the convex surface, found at Cold Eaton in
the neighbouring county of Derby,* and specimens found with a die
at Faversham, Kent.3 Dice in association with glass and bone draughts-
men are also known from Scandinavia.*
The Oxton barrow further yielded some objects of iron which may
to some extent be identified from the illustrations. An iron knife is
1 Arch, x, 381, pi. xxxv ; details of the site in ix, 20 1 ; Journ. Brit. Arch. Assoc. viii, 1 8 8.
1 Jewitt, Grave-mounds and their Contents, p. 293, fig. 484.
* Roach Smith, Collectanea Antiqua, vi, 138 (made of horse- teeth) ; other bone specimens from
Sarre, Archaeologta Cantiana, vi, 157 ; vii, 308.
4 Sophus Mailer, Nordische Altertumskunde, ii, 108 (Denmark) ; Rygh, Nonke Qldsagcr, figs. 474,
475 (Taasen, Akershus, Norway).
198
ANGLO-SAXON REMAINS
almost invariably found in Anglo-Saxon inhumations, and was used at
meals and for general purposes. A socketed cone of iron has the appear-
ance of a spear-butt, though the head was not recovered ; and a strip of
bronze binding may well have come from the edge of the shield. A
piece of iron, that is better drawn in Thoroton's account,1 was probably
the handle of the sword or the shield, and * the thin coat of smooth
yellow rust upon it ' would be, in that case, decayed wood, or possibly
leather. There need be, therefore, little hesitation in classing this as an
unburnt burial of the Anglo-Saxon period, though the mound may con-
ceivably have been in existence some centuries previously, and contained
Bronze Age interments of which no trace remained. Such was the case
at Oldbury, near Atherstone, just within the northern boundary of War-
wickshire. Here the barrow, at the time of exploration, was about twenty
feet in diameter at the base, rising in the centre to a height of about fifteen
feet ; but the Anglo-Saxon interment, marked by an iron spear-head and
shield-boss, was found with human bones only 2 ft. from the surface, the
usual depth at that period.2 Many cases in Yorkshire show that the
Teutonic invaders frequently availed themselves of grave-mounds that
were then at least a thousand years old and formed a conspicuous feature
of the landscape.
The bald statement that the brooch illustrated below (p. 203) was
found in a garden at Tuxford in 1865 is of a kind too frequently met
with in archaeological inquiry : it whets the curiosity and leaves it
unsatisfied on many points that careful excavation or even a superficial
examination of the site would have settled. Methods of precision, how-
ever, can hardly be expected in such chance discoveries, and it is a
matter for congratulation that this interesting relic of antiquity was
preserved at all. It recently passed into the hands of Sir John Evans,
who exhibited it to the Society of Antiquaries,8 and kindly allowed its
reproduction in these pages.
Its outline is familiar enough, and evidently further than the Holme
Pierrepont example from the prototype. Large square-headed specimens of
this type are mostly found in the counties of Leicester and Northampton
(five each), but four are also known from Cambridgeshire, and three each
from Norfolk, Suffolk, and Yorkshire ; Nottinghamshire and Lincoln-
shire have each yielded two, so that the centre of distribution is thus
fairly indicated ; but typical specimens occur sporadically further afield,
and a very close analogy to the Tuxford example is presented by one from
Sarre, on the highroad half-way between Canterbury and Ramsgate. The
isolated occurrence of another almost identical with the latter at Herpes,
Dept. Charente, near the centre of the west coast of France, does not point
to importation from that quarter, but rather the contrary; the prototype was
evidently evolved in the north of the Continent, though specimens found in
this country may well have been manufactured here on the traditional lines.
The side view shows a comparatively small bow and the position
of the hinge and catch-plate for the pin at the back, but the most
1 Hist, of Notts, ii, 176. * V. C.H. Warw. i, 267. * Proceedings, vol. xxi.
199
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
important feature is the disc attached to the front of the bow. A well-
known pattern, common in the Baltic island of Gothland, is not truly
parallel, being later in date and quite distinct as regards outline and
ornamentation. Comparison is best made with unpublished brooches from
Finningham and Ipswich, Suffolk, and a damaged example from Brooke,
Norfolk, now in the British Museum. In spite of its appearance, the
last was probably not burnt at the time of burial, as amber beads from
the same site are quite intact ; but it seems to have been intentionally
damaged before interment, and only the square head and bow with its
attached disc remain. The ornamentation on all four is similar, and the
type was evidently well established in this country. Below the bow may
be distinguished animal heads with open jaws, familiar in this position
on such brooches in northern Europe from the opening of the fifth century ;
but the rest of the surface exhibits little that suggests animal forms of
any kind. The three pear-shaped lobes and the two triangular patches
near the centre of the foot owe their form and position to the existence
of garnet settings on earlier and better examples of the type (as from
Sarre and Herpes). The same may be said of the two small cones on
the head (just above the junction with the bow), and of the lobes in the
upper corners, between which is a row of spectacle-ornament that is
generally derived from the human face, but is more probably a remote
descendant of Roman arcading.
The inner band is divided into square panels, some of which enclose
the eye of the characteristic animal of early Teutonic art, represented in
the present instance merely by a dot with two or three curved lines
beside it that may represent the neck of the animal.1 A single reference
will suffice for evidence of this derivation ; and lastly, attention may be
directed to the S-shaped engraving near the centre of the brooch-head,
as well as the rope pattern of the central disc, both reminiscent of the
scrolls so frequent in Roman work of the fourth century.8
Specimens with a disc on the bow, evidently belonging to the same
parent stock, but differing in details, are published from all three Scandi-
navian countries, and a remarkable specimen with an almost triangular
base was found at Bifrons, near Canterbury. Brooches of similar dimen-
sions with a hole in the bow, evidently for affixing a disc by means of a
rivet, are known from Bury St. Edmund's and Faversham, while a smaller
example has been found in Kent.3 It is fairly certain that all these
belong to the northern area of Europe, as contrasted with Bohemia,
Bavaria, and Switzerland, where early Teutonic antiquities of quite
distinct character are frequently met with. It was along the latter route
that the culture of the barbarians spread westward to Gaul and Britain,
south of the Thames ; while further north, in the midlands and East
Anglia, the North German and Scandinavian element was predominant.
Whether this fact explains the prevalence of cremation in the area indi-
1 B. Salin, Die altgermamsche Thierornamentik, p. 326.
1 Ibid. pp. 170—2.
* Arch, xli, pi. six, fig. i (Stowting)
2OO
ANGLO-SAXON REMAINS
cated has still to be decided, but the preceding pages show that cremation
was not the invariable practice here during the fifth and sixth centuries.
An important discovery of cremated burials at Kingston on Soar in
1844 was communicated to the British Archaeological Association1 by the
Rev. J. S. Henslow, at that time Professor of Botany in the University of
Cambridge. In the light of subsequent investigations it is no longer
permissible to attribute these cinerary urns to the aboriginal Britons ; they
are undoubtedly of Anglian origin, of a dark-coloured clay mixed with
fragments of felspar, and wrought by hand without the use of the lathe,
while the firing was very imperfect. Many were ornamented with lines
in various patterns, and some have in addition stamped devices probably
executed by means of a stick or bone. They were found deposited on the
slope and near the summit of a gentle eminence, about a quarter of a
mile to the east of Kingston Church, and over a space of about half an
acre. Workmen employed in trenching the ground for the shrubbery in
the grounds of Kingston Hall, then in course of erection for the Rt. Hon.
Edward Strutt (formerly M.P. for Derby, and afterwards Lord Belper), had
turned up and completely destroyed about two hundred of them before it
occurred to anyone that they were worthy of preservation. The owner
subsequently had the soil removed from the remainder of the space occu-
pied by the interments, and thus made it apparent that they had been
arranged in lines or trenches either singly or in groups, several deposits
being from four to six feet apart. As the field had been under the plough
about sixty years previously, it is not surprising that there was no surface
indication of the burials, or that all the urns had been more or less
mutilated. About thirty of the deposits were carefully removed, and the
fragments recovered were generally sufficient to indicate the size, shape,
and decoration of the urns. It seemed probable that the mouth of each
had been covered with a slab of sandstone, and it may thus be inferred
that all had been buried in an upright position. With the exception of
a small vase, which was empty, all contained human bones thoroughly
calcined. In a few were also found glass beads fused in the funeral pyre,
and in one some fragments of a bronze brooch, which is not described in
detail ; but no weapons or coins were found in or near the cemetery. "
The specimens figured in the original account furnish examples of most
of the forms and decorative patterns known in this class of pottery, and
vary in height from lof to 6 in., the exception mentioned above
being a cup 3§ in. high.
It was by the side of the Fosse Way that a number of cinerary urns
were found near Mill Gate at Newark in i836.a During excavations for
the foundation of a house at the south-west end of the town, fifteen or
sixteen specimens (see fig.) were recovered in fairly good condition, but
three or four times as many were destroyed in digging. Subsequently a
saw-pit was sunk, and about twenty more urns were found in an area of
1 Journ. vol. ii, p. 60 (where the site is wrongly stated to be in Derb.), vol. viii, p. 189 ; Arch.
Journ. iii, 158 ; and Roach Smith, Collectanea Antiqua, ii, 228, with plate of urns ; Jewitt's Reliquary,
vol. ix (1868-9), p. 6, and pi. ii.
' Roach Smith, Collectanea Antiqua, ii, 231 ; Journ. Brit. Arch. Assoc. iii, 194.
1 201 26
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
24 ft. by 4 ft. They appear to have been placed in regular quincunx
order, and all were in an upright position about two feet from the surface.
Each contained calcined bones, and in one alone were also found a pair
of bronze tweezers, a pair of iron shears, and part of a bone comb. l
Before proceeding to mention certain discoveries of a later period
we may conclude from the character and distribution of the antiquities
already described that the Rhaetic beds of red marl attracted the earliest
Teutonic settlers, who seem to have approached from the Lincolnshire
side, and to have followed the Fosse Way and the Trent Valley. The
former took them into Leicestershire, where antiquities of the period are
somewhat more plentiful but of similar character ; while the latter would
draw them across what is now the county border into Derbyshire. In
this connexion it should be noticed that early Anglo-Saxon sites in
Derbyshire fall into two main groups ; * the larger occupies the centre
of the western half of the county between Buxton and Matlock, and is
quite isolated from that in the southern angle, where the river valley
URN FROM NEWARK.
URN FROM NEWARK.
was the centre of attraction. The cemeteries of King's Newton, near
Melbourne, and of Stapenhill,3 near Burton, present many resemblances to
those in the adjoining county. The former site is only seven miles from
Kingston on Soar, and yielded a large number of cinerary urns of the
same description as those from Kingston Hall grounds and from Newark,
while the Stapenhill cemetery contained five burnt and thirty-one unburnt
burials, the latter not strictly orientated. Elsewhere in Derbyshire
different types of interment are not found intermingled, and the presence
of many Roman objects recalls discoveries at Holme Pierrepont, where
both rites may also have been practised. At present there is little to fix
1 George Milner, Cemetery Burial, pp. 26, 27, figs, reproduced in Journ. Brit. Arch. A HOC. viii,
pi. 27.
' Map in y. C.H. Derbyshire, \, 265 ; cf. pp. 272-5.
1 Another variety of trefoil-headed brooch was found here : Trans. Burton Arch, and Nat. Hist. Soe.
(1889), pi. vii.
202
IRON SWORD FROM
NOTTINGHAM .
~ ti«J
IRON SPEAR-HEAD WITH
CROSS-BAR, LONDON (J).
BRONZE-GILT BROOCH FROM
TUXFORD (I. 6| in.).
IRON SPEAR-HEAD FROM
NOTTINGHAM .
SWORD POMMEL FROM
NOTTINGHAM (^)
page 2OZ.
5V
BRONZE BROOCH FROM BROUGH (CROCOLANA). (J)
ANGLO-SAXON REMAINS
the date of this advance up the Trent Valley, but both the Holme
Pierrepont brooches illustrated evidently belong to the fifth century, and
a wave of immigration about that time would account for the isolated
occurrence of Anglo - Saxon
brooches at two stations on
the Fosse road. That illustrated
by kind permission of Mr. T.
Smith-Woolley was found at
Brough (identified with Cro-
colana), and is essentially
similar to the smaller Holme
Pierrepont specimen, both hav-
ing a trefoil head (see fig.) and
faceted bow and foot, in the
late Roman manner. The side
view shows the ear and rivet
for attaching the pin to the
back of the head (which is
accidentally bent) and the catch
projecting from the upper part
of the foot. A second speci-
men, of the same type but not so well preserved, is the only Anglo-
Saxon relic as yet found at Castle Hill, between Car Colston and East
Bridgford on the Roman road, the site being considered that of the
Roman station Margidunum.
In 1851 portions of two iron swords with a spear-head of unusual
form were found at Nottingham with two skulls and other human remains
at a depth of 3 ft. in a field adjoining the public baths and wash-
houses (between St. Mary's Cemetery and the County Lunatic Asylum).
These weapons were exhibited to the Archaeological Institute1 in the
same year, and are now preserved in the armoury at the Tower of
London.8 The spear is 24! in. long, with a maximum breadth of 2J in.;
while the sword is 36 in. long, 2j in. at the widest part of the blade, with
a guard 5J in. long and a grip of 3 in. These burials evidently belonged
not to the early Anglo-Saxon period, but to what is generally known in
this country as the Viking Age, corresponding in part to the Carlovingian
period of Western Europe. Spears with cross-bar below the blade are
rarely met with in this country,8 but are more frequent abroad, where
they were made within the kingdom of Charles the Great.* The perfect
sword belongs to one of the two main types, with a straight guard and
a three-lobed pommel. Many have been found in Norway,6 and others
are known from Scotland and Ireland, but their place of manufacture
1 Journ. viii, 424, with illustrations. * Nos. 158, 174, and 175 in catalogue.
1 Two from London and one from Amiens are in the British Museum, and one from the Thames is
in Reading Museum. A specimen is figured for comparison.
4 Mittheilungen der anthrof. Gesell. in Wien, xxix (1899), p. 37, pi. i.
4 Specimens in Bergen Museum described by A. L. Lorange, Den Tngre Jernalders SvaerJ: Rudolf
Wegeli, Zeitschrtft fur Historische Waffenkunde, vol. iii (1904).
203
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
is somewhat uncertain, and the most likely region is that near the mouths
of the Rhine. They were no doubt carried by the Northmen, to whom
Nottingham more than once fell a prey. The Danes, for instance, seized
the passage of the Trent and wintered there in 868.
Such is the somewhat meagre story of portable objects belonging
for the most part to the pagan Anglo-Saxon period, which have been
recovered from the soil of Nottinghamshire from time to time. Christian
monuments of pre-Norman date, such as the stone carvings still to be
seen in the county, are reserved for treatment elsewhere ; but as marking
the transition to Norman England one discovery of interest may be
mentioned in conclusion. Four ring-brooches of bronze, of plain and
solid workmanship, were included in the exhibition organized by the
Thoroton Society in 1899 l and are still in existence. All of the same
pattern (see fig.), they can be at once recognized as belonging to a type
hitherto poorly represented, and difficult to
date with precision. The available evidence
is somewhat contradictory and may be summed
up as follows : — Two are known from Berk-
shire8 : one was found, apparently with a
secondary interment, in a grave-mound on the
Lambourn Downs, and is now in the British
Museum ; while the other, now in Reading
Museum, comes from a grave lined with
Roman tiles in a meadow adjoining King's
Road, Reading. Two in the Royal Museum
at Canterbury were found in the neighbour-
hood, but further details are wanting ; while
two other discoveries might be approximately
dated, though the evidence points to the Norman period. A pair was found
buried in the flower garden at Audley End, Essex, and may have
belonged to a member of the Benedictine community on that site
(Walden Abbey), which dates from 1138. A similar conclusion may
be drawn from the occurrence of the same type on the site of Hyde
Abbey (founded 1 109)," where several of these brooches were found with
chalices, patens and ciboria in graves that retained traces of ecclesi-
astical vestments. Nothing definite as to date can be gathered from the
account of the Nottingham discovery, which took place in February, 1 841,
during excavations for the poor-house in York Street.* Human bones
were uncovered in great numbers, along with fragments of stonework,
part of a pavement of glazed tiles, several ' brass rings ' (the bronze
brooches in question), a large stone coffin, and other antiquities. The
site is supposed to have been that of the ancient church of St. Michael,
which was destroyed by the inhabitants in 1328 during a tumult with
1 Transactions of Thoroton Society, iii, 50.
1 V. C. H. Berks, i, pp. 238, 240, (with fig.).
* John Carter, Specimens of Ancient Sculpture and Painting, ii, 19 (figs.).
4 Nottingham Date Book, 10 Feb. 1841 ; Bailey, Annals of Notts, iv, 419 ; i, 210.
204
BRONZE RING-BROOCH FROM
NOTTINGHAM. ()
ANGLO-SAXON REMAINS
the body of foreign soldiers brought into the country with Philippa, the
young queen of Edward III. The brooches were evidently worn in
pairs at some period, and the moulding below the head of the pin is
characteristic ; while the specimen illustrated (see fig.) retains a fragment
of linen textile on the pin, showing that it had been fixed to the garment
at the time of burial. Another still bears a piece of leather inserted
between the ring and the pin head, and the same was found to be the
case at Hyde Abbey. The discoveries at Audley End and Winchester
certainly point to the early twelfth century, and the minor antiquities of
the Norman period are as yet but imperfectly known ; but such a date for
the Lambourn Down and Reading specimens does not seem appropriate,
and this discrepancy must be our excuse for including these brooches in
the present chapter.
205
DOMESDAY SURVEY
I
Nottinghamshire portion of the Domesday Survey has
perhaps received less attention than has been given to most
of the counties of the northern midlands. It is not one of
the more attractive parts of the great record, for its subject
matter is somewhat severely restricted to such details as were strictly
relevant to the main object of the Domesday Inquest, which was the
assessment and distribution of the king's ' geld.' Many problems are
raised in the course of the portion of the survey with which we have
to deal, but in general we can only hope to solve them in the light of
evidence drawn from beyond the borders of our county, for Domesday
rarely explains its own terminology, and local records which can be
applied to its elucidation are somewhat to seek in Nottinghamshire.
Several religious houses were founded in the county within seventy years
of Domesday, and their documents are useful in this connexion, but
none of them take in Nottinghamshire history the place which Peter-
borough records fill in that of Northamptonshire, nor have we any later
royal survey of our county such as we possess for its neighbours
Lincolnshire and Leicestershire.
This is the more to be regretted since Nottinghamshire was the
central member of a very interesting group of counties comprising
Lincolnshire, Yorkshire, Derbyshire, Leicestershire, and Rutland, which
are distinguished from the rest of England by many characteristic
features pointing, as is now recognized, to a Scandinavian colonization
of the district in the ninth century. These counties are divided into
' wapentakes ' instead of 'hundreds,' and are assessed in 'carucates' instead
of' hides,' while place-names ending in the accepted Scandinavian termina-
tion ' by ' are scattered unevenly over the district.1 In Nottinghamshire,
for instance, a well-marked group of such names, represented by Scrooby,
Serlby, Thoresby, Budby, Bilby, and Ranby, is congregated in the north-
western quarter of the county, outlying examples being Harby and
Barnby in the Willows on the Lincolnshire border, Saundby and Bleasby
on the Trent, and Granby and Willoughby on the Wolds close to
Leicestershire. Names like Gunthorpe, Staythorpe, and Owthorpe are
also suggestive, but evidence from local nomenclature is easily misin-
terpreted ; a much more certain and delicate test of ' Danish ' settlement
lies in the manner in which this group of counties was assessed to the
Danegeld.
1 There is still no more recent treatment of the distribution of these place-names than the Words
and Places of Isaac Taylor, whose results are utilized by Green, Conquest of England, 1 14-1 29.
207
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
In every other part of England except East Anglia and Kent the
basis of taxation was the * hide ' containing four ' virgates,' and this unit
when employed for fiscal purposes is normally found combined in groups
of five or ten, for the assessment of the south and west was arranged on
a decimal system. In Nottinghamshire and the counties which adjoin
it, the place of the hide was taken by the ' carucate,' consisting of eight
' bovates,' and from an analysis of the portion of Domesday relating to
this district it has been found that these carucates were normally dis-
posed so as to form blocks of six or twelve. This theory of the * six
carucate unit ' was first set forth by Mr. Round in Feudal England? and
the opposition between the * duodecimal ' system of assessment which
prevailed in that part of England which is known on other grounds to
have been subjected to ' Danish ' influence, and the * decimal ' system
found elsewhere has for the first time enabled the boundaries of the
Danelaw to be defined with something like exactitude. It must be
remembered that neither the carucate nor the bovate was in this sense
a measure of area, nor even when we read of acres in connexion with
assessment must we think of real divisions of the soil; these were all
purely fiscal terms, the bovate being divided into fifteen parts called
acres, and the carucate, as we have seen, containing eight bovates. The
' field carucates ' actually existing on the land bear no necessary relation
to the ' carucates assessed to the geld ' ; the number of the latter which
a county was reputed to contain was determined not by its acreage but
according to the will of the law-givers of the country, who fixed the
fiscal responsibility of each shire at their own pleasure.
The assessment of the Danelaw can most conveniently be studied in
Lincolnshire and Leicestershire ; for one reason because a survey of each
of these counties made under Henry I has come down to us and throws
much light upon the local distribution of the geld. But for our immediate
purpose it is more important to note that in proportion to their area Lin-
colnshire and Leicestershire were burdened with a much larger number
of carucates than was assigned to Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire.
Now the unequal rating of the several counties of the Danelaw certainly
deserves mention in any account of this subject, as it affected the assessment
of the whole district in every stage of its subpartionment. Thus Leicester-
shire and Nottinghamshire each contained about 270 vills surveyed in
Domesday, but whereas the former seems to have paid geld on 2,500
carucates,8 which would give an average of over nine to each vill, the latter
only paid on 567 carucates, representing an average of about two per vill.
Hence while cases of rating at six or more carucates may be noted on
every page of the Leicestershire survey, they are extremely rare in this
county. On the other hand, the assessment of vills at 1 2 bovates or
3 carucates is very characteristic of Nottinghamshire, and these are just
the figures in which we should expect the fiscal liability of the local
1 Feudal England, 79, et seqq.
1 Leicestershire statistics are complicated by the peculiar ' hide ' of that county, but in any case its
assessment as expressed in carucates was extremely high.
208
DOMESDAY SURVEY
groups to be expressed on a duodecimal system of repartition in view of
the favourable treatment which the county as a whole received in the
apportionment of the geld.
We may now proceed to the assessment of our county in detail,
remembering always that the unit of taxation was not the ' manor ' but the
vill, for in Nottinghamshire the two were rarely identical even at the date
of the survey. Beginning with Broxtow wapentake we may note the
following as instances of assessment at 3 carucates : Toton, Beeston,
Lenton (i + J+2), Radford, Sutton Passeys (ij+ij), Trowell
(iJ+i + J + i), and probably Bramcote (|1 + J + 2). Cossall (l + l),
Strelley (t + i + l), and ' Mortune ' stand at ij carucates each, all these
places lying west of Nottingham in the angle formed by the Trent
and Erewash. To the immediate north of them occurs a curious belt
of small vills such as Bilborough, Awsworth, Kimberley, Nuthall,
Greasley, Eastwood, and Brinsley, which are assessed at only i carucate
or less each, and therefore do not illustrate any system, while the north
of the wapentake was occupied by the king's great manor of Mansfield;
but across the Leen we find Arnold and Papplewick (2! + f) rated at
3 carucates each, with Linby near Papplewick and Kirkby in Ashfield
further west (li + i) both answering for ij carucates. On passing the
water-parting of the Erewash and Idle into Bassetlaw wapentake we
find, lying along the road from Mansfield to Tickhill, Warsop, Cuckney
(1 + 2), and Worksop assessed at 3 carucates; Mattersey in the extreme
north of the county (ii + i), Bothamsall, Elkesley (J + J + J), Houghton,
Tuxford, and Ruffbrd standing at ij carucates each. In the adjoining
wapentake of ' Lide ' occur Kneesall with Kersall, Winkburn, Hocker-
ton (i+i+f), and Norwell rated at ij carucates; Averham, Cromwell
(1+2|), and Sutton upon Trent (2f + £ + J) at 3.
Crossing the Greet into Thurgarton wapentake, the assessments at
first sight appear so unintelligible that it may be well to set them forth
in tabular form : —
Carucates Bovates Team-lands
Southwell with berewicks . . 22 4 24
Rolleston 4 4 9
Thurgarton 3 3 6
Gunthorpe 3 3 6
Lambley 2 2 3
Oxton 2 2 6
Hoveringham 2 2 4
Staythorpe I I 2
Blidworth I I 3
To these instances we may add that one manor in Bulcote and another in
Fiskerton were each assessed at 2 carucates, 2 bovates. Now the highest
common factor which can underlie all these figures is the strange sum of
9 bovates, a unit which seems absolutely confined to this wapentake.
What the meaning of this curious system may be, it would be difficult
to say, and the difficulty is not lessened by the fact that two of the above
1 Possibly the figure here is ' v ' not ' vi ' (bovates).
t 209 27
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
instances result from the addition of fractional assessments, the details of
which are meaningless by themselves and by no means well adapted to a
convenient payment of the geld.
Archbishop of York.
Bishop of Bayeux
Walter de Aincurt
Total
Rolleston
Car.
Bov. Team-lands
•k.
. O
. 2
4$ X
4i 6
. I
3^ 2
Oxton
Archbishop of York
Roger de Busli .
Walter de Aincurt .
Total
Car. Bov. Team-lands
06 2
i o ai
o 4
ii
6
Moreover in contrast to these fractional assessments it is important
to note that in seven out of the above nine cases the number of ' team-
lands ' is integral and ' duodecimal ' in character. As, with the exception
of Calverton which was assessed at ij carucates,1 the above table includes
every vill in the wapentake the assessment of which can be distinguished
from that of its neighbours, the recurrence of this nine-bovate unit cannot
well be regarded as accidental. Whatever its origin it strikingly
differentiates the assessment of this particular district from that of the
rest of the shire, and illustrates the solidarity of the wapentake in matters
of taxation.
South-east of the Trent it is more difficult to detect the influence of
any system of assessment. The subdivision of vills was carried much
further in the open land of the vale of Belvoir and the Nottinghamshire
wolds than in the largely afforested north and west of the shire, with
the result that the assessment of the former district is far more compli-
cated than that of the latter. It must be confessed that the several frac-
tions of villar assessment do not work out so well as might be expected
into even duodecimal totals, and we possess for this county no clue to the
system by which vills were combined in roundly assessed fiscal groups,
although by analogy with Lincolnshire and Leicestershire we know that
such a principle must have been in operation.2 And another difficulty
which should not be ignored lies in the fact that many of these southern
assessments are expressed in very small fractions involving thirds, quarters,
and fifths of a bovate. Now Mr. Round has shown that for some reason
or other the compilers of Domesday were not very careful in recording
minute fractions of assessment,3 a failing which at once introduces an
element of doubt into our calculations. It so happens that in the one
case in which the assessment of a Nottinghamshire vill is recorded in
another document than Domesday we find a divergence between the two.
In Domesday, Collingham is rated at 4 carucates, oj bovate ; in the
Black Book of Peterborough it stands for 4 carucates, of bovate.* Here
the discrepancy is so small that it gives us no reason to suppose a fresh
assessment to have taken place, but it is quite enough to suggest that
1 It is probable that this is only an apparent exception, for Salterford, which is in the modern
parish of Calverton was rated at 6 bovates, so that the combined assessment of both places would stand
at 2 carucates, 2 bovates.
8 See Feudal England, 75-81. 3 Feudal England, 1 6-2 1 .
' Chrm. Petroburgense (Camden Soc.), 159.
210
DOMESDAY SURVEY
the Domesday figures may not be infallible. It will be evident that a
very small margin of error in the figures themselves would make the task
of their combination into duodecimal totals impossible for us.
For all this we can trace a number of assessments of the normal
type in the southern half of our county beginning with Wysall (3 caru-
cates), on the Leicester border, and continuing through Bradmore,
Plumtree, Normanton on the Wolds (f + T\ + T\), i£ carucates each,
Cotgrave 6 (2 + 1 + 3) and Edwalton (f + }) i£, to the Trent at Wil-
ford, 3, West Bridgford, Adbolton (I + I), Holme Pierrepont, ij each,
RadclifFe on Trent, 3 carucates (ii + ij), Saxondale, and Newton
(I + ii), i£ carucates each. Lying apart from this group occurs Orston,
3 carucates, and away in Newark wapentake we find Girton assessed at i J.
Lastly, crossing the Trent once more we may illustrate the possi-
bilities of the combination of vills by setting forth the very neat assess-
ment of North and South Muskham with the hamlet of Little Carlton
included in the latter. The long continued association of these three
places, which occupy a corner of ' Lide ' wapentake to themselves, makes
it very probable that this was the grouping actually employed in the
distribution of the geld.
Car. Bov. Team-lands
North Muskham
Archbishop of York . . . .14 (not given)
Peterborough Abbey .... I 2 4
'Uluric' o
Sokeland . . . . . . O
'Tochi' 2
Siward . . . . . . o
South Muskham
Archbishop of York . . . .4
'Sortebrand' . . . . . O _,
Little Carlton
Sokeland to North Muskham . o i) (not given)
We shall find it convenient to consider in connexion with assess-
ment what is perhaps the most difficult problem presented by the Not-
tinghamshire survey — the relation between gelding carucates, plough-
lands, and actual plough-teams. The second are in uniform excess of the
first, but the third are so greatly in excess of the second that the
question whether the term ' plough-land ' bears its obvious meaning in
this county has seriously to be faced. This has attracted the attention
of Professor Maitland, who says : —
To interpret the steady excess of teams that we see in Nottingham and Derby
is not easy. We can hardly suppose that the jurors are confessing that they employ
a superfluity of oxen. Perhaps, however, we may infer that in this district a given
area of land will be ploughed by an unusually large number of teams, whereas in
Devon and Cornwall a given area will be ploughed, though intermittently, by an
unusually small number. In every way the contrast between Devon and Cornwall
on the one hand, Lincoln, Nottingham, and Derby on the other, is strongly marked.1
Now the case of Nottinghamshire stands somewhat apart from that
of its neighbours to east and west. In Lincolnshire there seem after all
1 Domesday Book and Beyond, 427.
211
6-4
4
i
4
I2'0
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
to be more plough-lands than teams, and these two quantities approxi-
mate pretty closely to each other throughout the shire. In Derbyshire,
on the other hand, the plough-lands keep fairly close to the gelding
carucates, but are 100 below the number of existing teams. The pecu-
liarity of the case of Nottinghamshire is that while the teams exceed the
plough-lands by 736, the latter are 688 in excess of the fiscal units. For the
sake of clearness, we may express these figures in the following table : —
Lincolnshire
Derbyshire
Nottinghamshire .
Carucates
4188
679
567
Plough-lands
• 5043
762
1255
Teams
4712
862
1991 :
But a further point which comes out strikingly on an analysis of
the survey of our county is that the plough-lands, like the carucates of
assessment, tend to be distributed among the vills according to a
duodecimal system. Below is given a series of instances arranged
according to wapentakes : —
Rushdiffe
Blngham
Car.
Bov.
Ratcliffe upon Soar
I
2i
Stanford upon Soar
. 2
4
Barton in Fabis
. 2
3T\
Wilford . . .
• 3
o
Bunny
. 2
0
Bonnington
I
I
Wysall . . .
• 3
o
Plumtree
i
4
Bradmore .
i
4
West Bridgford
i
4
Basset!aw
Car.
Bov.
Dunham and ' bere-
wicks'
• 5
4
Gamston upon Idle
i
I
Elkesley
i
4
Cuckney
• 3
o
Boughton .
o
6
Grove ....
o
A
Finningley .
. o
T
6
Ossington .
. 0
6
Stokeham
. o
6fi
Bilby ....
. o
Plough-
lands Teams
12
9
6
6
6
3
3
3
12
6
Si
9
9
4
6
9
3
4
Whatton
Shelford
Bingham
Staunton
Barnston
Radcliffe
Bassingfield
Clipstone
Scarrington
Mansfield and
wicks'
Trowell
Arnold
Radford
Stapleford
Cossall
' Mortune '
Annesley
Teversall
Plougb
L-
Car.
Bov.
lands
Teams
....
2
4
9
12
e
•}
Q
IO
J
4
o
7
6
'7*
.
2
i|
6
8
.
I
of
6
9*
upon Trent .
3
o
6
IO
eld ...
2
o
3
4
3
o
3
8
on ...
2
o
3
72
'ierrepont .
I
4
3
7
Broxtow
Car. Bov.
Plough-
lands Teams
'here-
.... 3
6
9
2l£
.... 3
o
3
8
o
8
0
o
6
d .... 2
6
3
9
i
I i-
ie'. . . . i
4
xi
ii
f .... i
0
I2L
8
1 .... 0
6
!£
5i
Thurgarton
Car. Bov.
Southwell and ' bere-
wicks ' .... 22 4
Rolleston .... 4 4
Gunthorpe ••••33
Thurgarton •••33
Oxton 22
Lambley .... 2 2
Blidworth i i
-Udt'
Plough-
lands
Teams
Norwell .
Car.
I
Bov.
Plough-
lands T
6
earns
Q
24
9
6
6
6
3
3
90
10}
20
8
6
2
Lax ton .
Averham
Bilsthorpe .
Marnham .
Winkburn .
Willoughby
• 3
• • 3
. 2
. . 2
I
. . o
O
0
0
6|
4
5
6
6
6
6
3
7
6
6
9
2
Professor Maitland's figures.
212
DOMESDAY SURVEY
Now in face of these tables it seems as if our choice can only lie between
three possible alternatives. Either the recurrence of these duodecimal
figures is accidental, or the jurors habitually employed a duodecimal
method of reckoning in stating the agricultural possibilities of their vills,
or else we have in these figures fragments of an obsolete system of assess-
ment as conventional as that which prevailed in the distribution of
gelding carucates. The first suggestion seems impossible — the above
tables account for 20 per cent, of the total number of vills in the
county, and as at least two-thirds of the remainder are either surveyed
in connexion with other vills or else, through inadvertence on the part
of the scribes, are not assigned any plough-lands in the survey, the
proportion of duodecimal figures seems much too high to be the result
of chance. The second conclusion also is improbable ; we find no traces
of such a habit of reckoning elsewhere. The third possibility, unlikely as
it may seem at first, is greatly strengthened by the fact that the ' plough-
land ' in Northamptonshire and Rutland has been proved to be a con-
ventional quantity. The above tables in fact strikingly resemble those
given by Mr. Round in the Victoria History of Northamptonshire, of the
assessment of Rutland, and of the hundreds of Nassaburgh and Willey-
brook, Northants,1 not only in the steady excess of the plough-lands
over the carucates, but also in the fact that no constant ratio can be
discovered between these two quantities. Nor must we forget that at
the time of Domesday Rutland was closely associated for fiscal purposes
with Nottinghamshire, to the survey of which its own account is
appended,3 while the Rutland evidence further reminds us that figures
which do not imply a duodecimal system of reckoning may nevertheless
be combined into groups based on this principle. After all this, it seems
that we shall be fairly safe in saying that the possibility of the Not-
tinghamshire plough-land being an obsolete fiscal term ought to be
kept in mind in any future discussion of this unit.
We may now briefly recapitulate the main conclusions suggested by
the Nottinghamshire assessment. We have seen that the county as a
whole was very leniently treated in the general distribution of the ' geld,'
and that this produced a correspondingly low assessment of individual
vills, so that the fiscal units characteristic of the shire are of 3 or ij caru-
cates instead of the 1 2 or 6 carucate groups which prevailed in Lincoln-
shire and Leicestershire. It has been shown that this normal system
of rating is displaced in Thurgarton wapentake by a very peculiar series
of assessments seemingly based upon a ' unit ' of 9 bovates, and that in the
south of the county the extreme subdivision of vills places difficulties in
the way of our reconstructing the total villar assessments. Lastly, we
have seen that the plough-lands of Nottinghamshire show distinct traces of
a duodecimal system of distribution as artificial as that which prevailed in
the apportionment of assessment carucates, which connects the terrae
carucis of our county with the conventional plough-lands of Rutland
and North Northamptonshire.
1 V. C. H. 'Northants, i, 266-268. * See below, p. 240.
213
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
First in order among the landowners of Nottinghamshire stands the
king, the extent of whose possessions may be gathered from the Domes-
day map. Stretching across some sixty vills they were in fact almost
entirely grouped as ' sokeland,' or ' berewicks,' round the five great
manors of Dunham, Bothamsall, Mansfield, Arnold, and Orston, all of
which stand out conspicuously in the feudal history of the shire.
Bothamsall, the least important of the five, had belonged to Earl Tostig
of Northumbria ; the rest had formed part of the demesne of Edward
the Confessor; while on the Leicestershire border, apart from this group,
the king had reserved to himself ' Neubold ' (in Kinoulton) and Upper
Broughton, previously belonging to the house of Leofric of Mercia.1 The
centre of his territory in our county, however, consisted of the large
manor of Mansfield with its dependent ' sokeland.' The latter lay in
two blocks, one extending from Mansfield itself along the Maun,
Meden, and Poulter, to the border of the ' soke ' of Bothamsall which
lay along the Idle ; the other scattered over the north-eastern division of
the county, the ' Oswardbeck wapentake ' of Domesday. The northern
group of sokeland maintained its unity as ' Oswardbeck Soke ' right
through the Middle Ages ; the western group is interesting because it
included just that district which is now known as Shirewood forest —
the northern half of the forest as it is defined in mediaeval ' perambu-
lations.'2 We have no proof of any afforestation in our county before
the Pipe Roll of 1 130, when William Peverel answers de placitis forestae?
but it is distinctly probable that the king in keeping this region in his
own hands may have had an eye to its sporting possibilities.
The ecclesiastical history of these manors is unusually clear. In
1093 William Rufus gave to Robert Bloet, the newly-appointed bishop
of Lincoln, the churches of Mansfield and Orston, ' with the chapels
which are in the berewicks belonging to the said manors,' 4 a grant
which is interesting as showing the relationship between a manor and its
berewicks reproduced in the ecclesiastical sphere in the distinction
between a ' church ' and its (dependent) chapels. Domesday mentions a
church as existing at Mansfield and Orston, and so late as i79oThrosby,
in his edition of Thoroton, says, ' The church (of Orston) is reputed the
mother-church of Scarrington, Thoroton, and part of Staunton,' three of
the dependencies of Orston in io86.6 Henry I gave Dunham church
to Archbishop Thurstan of York, who made of it a prebend in his church
of Southwell,6 where it still gives a title to an honorary canon ; and
Henry II, between 1154 and 1158, added the church of Arnold to the
donations which he confirmed to Laund Priory, Leicestershire.7
1 Probably Upper Broughton, Notts., and Nether Broughton, Leic., had originally formed one
estate, for the former had belonged to Earl jElfgar, of Mercia, and the latter to Earl Morcar, of North-
umbria, his son.
1 See the perambulation of Shirewood forest in the time of Henry III given in Select Pleas of the
Forest (Selden Society).
' Pipe Roll 31 Henry I (Rec. Com.) « Men. Anff. viii, 1271.
5 Hist, of Nottinghamshire, 1790, 224.
6 Man. Angl. viii, 1314. ' Man. Angl. vi, 189.
214
DOMESDAY SURVEY
At the end of the account of the king's land come a number of
miscellaneous entries relating to Flintham, the former possession of one
' Elwin,' Kneeton, Sneinton, Meering, and Misson. The latter is an
interesting vill, for three of the parcels into which it was divided were
appendages of manors outside our county. The king possessed 3 J bovates
there, over three of which the ' soke ' belonged to Kirton-in-Lindsey,
while the remaining half bovate is said to ' lie ' in ' Lestone,' and to be
held by ' Guy,' and by ' Alfred ' under him. ' Lestone ' is Laughton
near Gainsborough (Lines.), and we may safely recognize our Misson
tenants in Guy ' de Credun,' the owner of Laughton, and Alfred his man
who held of him there.1 Of the other vills, Meering before the Conquest
had been held by a certain William who is not otherwise distinguished.
But immediately across the Trent from Meering lies Sutton upon Trent,
of which the previous owner is given as ' William the son of Scelward,'
and in view of the rarity of the name William before the Conquest,
and of the contiguity of these two places, we shall hardly be wrong
in assuming the identity of their former possessors. The case of
Sneinton will be discussed later.8
The valuations of the more important royal manors deserve con-
sideration in connexion with the very difficult question of the Domes-
day valet. Of Dunham we read : ' In King Edward's time it rendered
£30 and 6 sestiers of honey, now £20 with all things that belong
there.' Here the sum named is evidently that which was actually
received for the manor, and the same must be the case at Arnold, which
is said in King Edward's time to have been worth (valebat] £4 ar>d
2 sestiers of honey, for no one would express a valuation in the modern
sense in terms of pounds and honey. Similarly the phrase used at
Orston, ' it was worth £30 by tale ' (adnumerum), points to a rent received
rather than to an estimate of potential revenue, and should be compared
with the Lincolnshire formulas valebat . . . cum pondere et arsione or
cum pensioned Outside the royal demesne we find one clear instance of
rent at Newark of which we read : ' In King Edward's time it rendered
£50, now (it renders) £34 ' ; and a probable instance at Southwell which
had been worth (va/e&at) £4°> but had risen to £40 r $s. Such round
figures as £40, £30, £$o, when applied to large and heterogeneous
manors suggest that the latter have been ' farmed ' or set to rent as single
wholes, and here we may see at least a partial explanation of the fact
that no value is usually assigned to ' sokeland ' in our county ; at Newark
and on the royal manors quoted above its proceeds must be in-
cluded in the rent received from the whole manorial group. There is
much in Domesday Book to suggest that historical economists have
generally underestimated the play of monetary forces in the eleventh
century.4
1 Dom. Bk., f. 367. ! See below, p. 245.
3 These formulas are found on the royal demesne at Kirkby Laythorpe, Kime, Boothby Pagnell,
and Wellingore.
* See for the Domesday 'valet ' r. C. H. Essex, i, 364.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
In most counties the compilers of the survey, after describing the
king's land, pass at once to the estates of the ecclesiastical tenants-
in-chief within the shire, but here this rule of precedence is not
observed. Two folios are devoted to the king's land, after which a folio
is left blank, and then the survey deals with the three lay tenants of
comital rank within the county — Earl Hugh of Chester, and Counts Alan
of Richmond and Robert of Mortain. The survey of Count Alan's land
is thrown together somewhat carelessly. His manors of Sibthorpe,
Sutton upon Trent, Ruddington, Kneeton, and Treswell follow each other
in column, his holdings in Syerston, Carlton upon Trent, and South
Leverton (' Cledretone ') being described in the margin. The account
of the latter place runs : —
In Cledretone habuerunt Godric & Ulmar vii bovatas terrae et quintam partem
unius bovatae ad geldum.
Hanc terram tenuerunt Alanus comes et Rogerus de Busli usque nunc. Terra ii carucis.
Valet xx solidos.
Now on f. 287 Roger de Busli is credited with an estate at ' Cledretone'
rated at 3! bovates,1 valued at los. and reputed to contain i 'plough-land,'
details representing exactly half of this place as it is described under
Count Alan's fief. On the Busli estate ' half a church ' is entered and
also a certain amount of woodland and meadow which probably belonged
to the vill as a whole, for we are told ' hujus silvae et prati medietatem
habet Rogerus.' Here then we have a duplicate entry of somewhat
unusual form, and the explanation is probably to be found in the descrip-
tion of the neighbouring vill of Treswell, which also was divided between
the same two tenants-in-chief in approximately equal proportions.
Count Alan's share had belonged to a certain Ulmar, and Roger de
Busli's to one Godric. Now ' Cledretone ' as described on Count Alan's
land is said to have belonged to Godric and Ulmar, and it would doubt-
less be the latter's portion only which passed to Count Alan, although the
details of assessment and value given as referring to his land refer to both
shares. In the Robert de Mosters who held Treswell of the count we have
one of the earliest recorded bearers of a surname well known in Notting-
hamshire history, whose descendants continued to hold land in that vill of
the honour of Richmond down to the reign of Edward III. He was
doubtless the Robert de Musters who granted land to Count Alan's new
foundation of St. Mary's abbey, York.2 Another of the count's tenants
deserving mention is the Hervey (a characteristically Breton name) who
held Sutton upon Trent, for the name reappears in connexion with Sutton
under Henry II.3
In contrast to the string of undistinguished men who had preceded
Count Alan, all Earl Hugh's manors in this county had belonged to a
certain Harold in whom, though he is mentioned in our survey without any
note of rank, we must recognize no less a person than the former earl of
1 'iii bov1- terrae et dim"1 et medietatem quintae partis unius bovate.'
1 Men. Angl. iii, 532. * Vide Pipe Roll, 22 Henry II (Pipe Roll Sac.), 95.
216
DOMESDAY SURVEY
Wessex and king. In Lincolnshire and Leicestershire also Earl Hugh
appears as the successor of Harold, whose Leicestershire estates of
Barrow upon Soar, Loughborough (probably), and Kegworth are connected
geographically with the manors of Kingston, Sutton Bonnington, and
Normanton, which he had held on the Nottinghamshire bank of the
Soar. With the exception of a one-bovate manor at Newthorpe in
Broxtow wapentake all the possessions of the count of Mortain lay in
the south-western corner of our county, and had belonged to an English-
man named ' Stori.' The name occurs several times elsewhere in the
Danelaw, but it is impossible to say whether it refers to the same man
in every case.1
Of much greater interest are the estates of the archbishop of York,
which occupy the next folio of the survey and still maintain their
individuality as the Liberty of Southwell and Scrooby. It is important
to note that the collegiate church of Southwell, the one religious house
which our county possessed in Anglo-Saxon times, like its sister churches
of York (St. Peter's), Beverley, and Ripon, does not appear in the survey
as holding in chief of the crown. The intimate and historical connexion
which existed between the archbishop of York and his four great
' colleges ' of secular canons caused the latter to be represented as holding
of him, and the lands appropriated to them to be entered among his
estates. First among the latter stands the great manor of Southwell
itself, the elaborate description of which deserves careful study. We are
first given the assessment of the whole manor with its berewicks, which
we have seen to be rated at 22 £ carucates and 24 plough-lands. Then
follows a description of that part of the manor which was in the hands
of the archbishop, after which we are told that six knights hold 4^ caru-
cates of this land, three clerks hold ij, of which 2 bovates are in a
prebend, and, a unique entry for our county, two Englishmen (Anglicf)
hold 3 carucates, 5 bovates. These three parcels of the manor are then
described one after the other and the total result deserves to be set out
in detail : —
Demesne Villein
Car. Bov. Teams Teams Sokemen Villeins Bordars
Archbishop's land . (not stated) 10 37 10 75 23
Knights' lands ..44 7 21 35 28
Clerks' lands ..14 !? 3 7 5
Englishmen's land 3 5 4 6£ 20 6
Lastly we have an account of the appurtenances of the manor in meadows
and woodlands, together with a very unusual entry of ' arable land,
5 leagues in length and 3 in breadth.' Domesday so rarely expresses
arable land in terms of lineal measure that we ought to work out the
relation which these figures bear to the number of plough-lands recorded
for the whole manor, though, if we are wise, we shall not hope for any
very intelligible result, especially in view of the possibility that the
Nottinghamshire plough-land was, after all, a conventional quantity. As
1 See V. C. H. Bedfordshire, i, 203 ; V. C. H. Derbyshire, \, 304.
I 217 28
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
a matter of fact we arrive by this process at an average for the Southwell
terra carucae, which is simply inconceivable on any theory of the acreage of
the plough-land. On the Eytonian equation of 1 2 furlongs to the leuca
the above land would contain 21,600 acres, which divided among the
24 Southwell plough-lands would give us an average of no less than
900 acres to the plough-land. Even if we adopt Mr. Round's suggestion
of 8 furlongs to the ' league,' we shall have an average of 600 acres to
account for. Nor can we obtain relief by assuming that while the state-
ment about ' arable land ' relates to the whole manor the number of
plough-lands only refers to part of it ; the latter is given in connexion
with the assessment figures, and undoubtedly refers to the whole. Probably
there does not occur elsewhere in Domesday so violent a discrepancy
between recorded area and estimated plough-lands x ; a discrepancy in our
case which no allowance reasonably to be made for the uncertainty of early
lineal measurements will reduce to workable proportions. On the other
hand if we use for our divisor the number (90) of actual teams existing
on the manor we shall be able (on Mr. Round's equation of 8 furlongs
= i league) to assign an average of 160 acres to each team; a sufficiently
neat quotient, but one which only throws up the artificiality of the
plough-lands into stronger relief.
Of course the population enumerated in the above table is much too
large to be contained in any one rural manor, and Domesday, after its
statement of value, tells us that ' in Southwell there are reckoned (numer-
antur] twelve berewicks.' Now we possess a copy of a charter dated
958 which purports to be a grant by King Eadwig to (arch) bishop
Oskytel (of York) of 20 cassates of land at Southwell.3 This charter
is more than probably spurious, but it contains a list of the lands belong-
ing to Southwell which, whether the document be genuine or not,
represents the earliest statement of the constituent vills of the manor
which has come down to us, and it may accordingly be used to illustrate
the Domesday text. These lands are said to be Halloughton, Upton,
Halam, Bleasby, Goverton, Gibsmere, Fiskerton, Morton, Normanton,
Farnsfield, and Kirklington, all of which at the present day form part of the
manor of Southwell. Here we account for eleven of our twelve unnamed
berewicks, the first four of which are not mentioned in Domesday at all,
while Upton only comes in incidentally under Rolleston. Parts of the
other berewicks which lay outside the archbishop's land are described in
due course, but in every case but one the soke over them is said to
belong to Southwell. This one exception casually reveals a fact of
considerable importance, for on Walter de Aincurt's land occurs the
entry : ' In Farnsfield Walter has two bovates of land assessed to the
1 Compare Domesday Book and Beyond, 434, where a number of other instances are compared.
The arable land entered at Rolleston (Staffs.), Professor Maitland's extreme example, only gives 360 acres
to the team-land.
Birch, Cartul. Sax,lO2<). If genuine, this would be a highly important document, for it distinctly
asserts that the archbishop possessed sac and soc over his Southwell estate. But the text is very corrupt,
and the list of witnesses seems to have been modelled upon the attestations to the charter of Edgar,
which precedes it in the Liber Albus.
218
DOMESDAY SURVEY
geld. One is in the soke of Southwell and the other is the king's, but,
nevertheless, it belongs to the hundred of Southwell.' Taken simply
these words would seem to imply that the soke of Southwell and the
hundred of Southwell were, or ought to be, identical, otherwise there
would be no object in Domesday pointedly noting an exception to this
arrangement. If this were so it would give us a welcome clue as to the
composition of one of these mysterious Danelaw ' hundreds.'
The statement under Southwell that 2 bovates were ' in a prebend '
is important in view of the appropriation of capitular revenues to par-
ticular canons which it implies, for such cases are rare in Domesday.1
We shall not be far wrong in assigning the above 2 bovates to the
prebend of Normanton, for this was the only one of the early prebends
within the manor of Southwell which possessed an endowment in land.
Other manors said to have belonged to St. Mary of Southwell in pre-
Conquest times were Cropwell Bishop, with its berewick of Hickling, and
Norwell, with its soke ; and we may note that away in east Leicestershire
Tilton is said to belong to the alms of St. Mary of Southwell.*
Passing now to the lands held in the archbishop's own hand, we may
recognize the northern part of the modern liberty of Southwell .and
Scrooby in his two large manors of Laneham and Sutton. The account
of the former gives us a wholesome caution not to press Domesday termin-
ology too far. It runs : — ' In Lanun cum Berewitis his .... novem
carucatae terrae et ii bovatae ad geldum .... In dominio aulae sunt
x bovatae de hac terra. Reliqua est soca.' Here, then, although all the
vills dependent on Laneham are distinctly described as ' berewicks,' the
whole of the land in them not in demesne turns out to be ' sokeland.'
The phrase dominio aulae, which is contrasted with soca, is unique in
Nottinghamshire and Derby, and not very common elsewhere. The
manner in which Laneham is surveyed also deserves a passing notice. First
comes the archbishop's own portion of the manor, probably consisting
only of Laneham itself; then we read of the sokemen, villeins, and bordars
holding of him in its berewicks ; and, lastly, there are entered 33 soke-
men, 6 villeins, and 18 bordars, with the curious statement, ' hos cum
terra sua tenent ii° milites de archiepiscopo.' This synthetical method
of description, as applied to large and discrete manors, is a sort of com-
promise between the usual practice of entering each parcel of ' sokeland '
separately and the plan of merely giving a string of villar headings with
the appropriate assessments, such as was followed in the account of
Mansfield. The appurtenances of the manor with which we are dealing
extended across the Trent into Lincolnshire, for in the Domesday of
that county the archbishop is assigned 100 acres of meadow 'as belonging
to Laneham '
The manor of Sutton (with Scrooby) is interesting, because the York
Liber Albus has preserved the text of the charter by which Edgar granted
1 Another instance occurs at Stafford, fol. 247^.
1 This probably means that Tilton joined the vills of Nottinghamshire in the Pentecostal offering
which the latter made at the church of Southwell.
219
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
it to Archbishop Oskytel of York. This latter seems to be genuine, and
is one of the very few similar documents older than the eleventh century
which relate to the Danelaw.1 Apart from this the manor, the sokeland of
which is only described in abstract, does not call for special remark.
Blidworth, which is now part of the manor of Southwell, stands by itself
as a manor in Domesday, with parts of Calverton and Oxton as its
dependencies. Oxton, indeed, is entered as a separate manerium, desig-
nated as such by the symbol M in the margin, and assigned to a pre-
Conquest owner ' Elnod.' But at the end of the entry we read ' the
king has one bovate of this land, the rest belongs (iacet) to Blidworth.'
Accordingly, we have here an instance of one manenum dependent on
another.
The possessions of the bishop of Lincoln all lay in the east of our
county, and were entirely dominated by his manor of Newark. Although
only styled a manor in the survey, Newark possessed fifty-six burgesses
(whose existence is only revealed to us through an interlineation), and
has, presumably on this account, been included in the small class of
boroughs which were situated on private land in io86.s Whether a
borough or not before the Conquest, Newark must have been very recently
under a lord of comital rank, for it was given, together with Fledborough
and Well wapentake, Lincolnshire, by the famous Countess Godeva, wife
of Earl Leofric of Mercia, to the bishop of Lincoln and his monastery of
Stow in Lindsey.3
The Conqueror confirmed the grant/ and Newark became a
favourite residence of the bishops of Lincoln, especially after the founda-
tion of its castle by Bishop Alexander (1123—1147). But to the
Domesday student the chief interest of Newark will consist in its soke
and the rights which the bishops of Lincoln possessed over it. At the
time of the survey the bishop exercised rights of jurisdiction over three
wapen takes, Newark, and Well and Lawress in Lincolnshire ; the
first two being in virtue of the above grant of the Countess Godeva.
However, the rights conferred over Newark were not quite the same as
those which the bishop enjoyed over his two Lincolnshire wapentakes.
Thus, in the Lincolnshire (West Riding) ' clamores,' we read : —
' Super forisfacturam de (Lagulris) ' De omnibus tainis qui terrain habent in
wapentac hab(uit) S. Maria ii partes Welle wapentac habet S: Maria ii partes et
soc(ae) et comes terciam. Nunc Rex. comes terciam. Similiter de heriete. Simi-
Similiter de heriete. Et si terram liter si terram suam forisfecissent ii partes in
suam forisfecissent S: Maria ii partes S: Maria et terciam partem in manu comitis
habuisset et comes terciam.' hunc habet rex.' 6
The grammar of these passages is not above reproach, but we can see that
only the king's two pennies, and not the earl's third penny, were in
1 Birch, Cartul. Sax., iii, 249 (not in Codex Diplomaticus).
' Domesday Book and Beyond, 213.
3 See the documents in Man. Angl. iii, under the heading of Eynsham Priory.
* The text of the charter is preserved in the Eynsham Register, which will shortly be published by
the Oxford Historical Society.
4Dom. Bk., f. 376.
220
DOMESDAY SURVEY
the bishop's hand. On the other hand, we are told of Newark that : —
' Ad Newercke adiacent omnes consuetudines regis et comitis de ipso
wapentac,' and this distinction is borne out by the statement on folio
280^, that the Countess Godeva had held (over Newark wapentake) not
only the king's two pennies but the earl's third penny as well. From a
charter of Henry I we learn in addition that Newark was only reckoned
as a 'half wapentake, and, accordingly, that only two men were to be
summoned from it to pleas of the crown and the shire court.1
This district is interesting for another reason. Nottinghamshire as a
whole, was very far indeed from being a fully manorialized county ; and in
Newark wapentake, or at least in that strip of it which lay between the
Lincolnshire border and the Trent, the process which was always creating
the villar-manorial economy seems scarcely to have begun before the
Conquest. Wholly or in part seventeen vills are included in the soke of
Newark, the population of which is given by Domesday as 174 sokemen
and 14 bordars, not a single villein being mentioned, nor any hint given
of the existence of demesne. The conclusion forces itself upon us that
the predecessors of these sokemen had no immediate lord below the king
and the earl, and we see also that the bishop's rights over them are
essentially connected with his possession of the wapentake to which
they belonged. Moreover, such powers as he possessed can hardly have
been of such a nature as to affect very intimately the social organization
of the group. Large as was the manor of Newark, it can hardly have
called for any very onerous agricultural services from its appurtenant
sokemen ; it had 42 villeins of its own. Probably these sokemen
furnished to the bishop little more than their jurisdictional and fiscal
profits, such as the ' heriot ' and ' forfeiture ' of which our Lincolnshire
quotations speak. Something similar may doubtless be said of those
sokemen of Oswardbeck wapentake who belonged to the king's manor of
Mansfield. On the other hand, we shall shortly see an instance of soke-
land united to its manor by much more definite and stringent ties. No
argument could well be more unsafe than that which would represent
the vague and obscure bonds which so often connected vill with vill in
our county to have been even approximately the same in all cases.
Even apart from the immediate soke of Newark, the vills of the wapen-
take show traces of extreme subdivision before 1066. Clifton upon Trent,
for instance, had been divided into five manors, Coddington into four manors
and one carucate of sokeland, Hawton into sixteen manors and three dis-
tinct parcels of sokeland. Most of the wapentake was held by the bishop,
and had come to him from numerous small owners. One of the latter,
the Agemund who had possessed i\ bovates as a manor in Clifton, con-
tinued to hold the same under the bishop. The ' Arnegrim ' who was a
joint tenant at Elston can safely be identified with the man of the same
name who held part of Sibthorpe and Elston under Ilbert de Lacy.
These two vills are connected in another way, for the ' Pilewin ' who had
1 Man. Angl. viii, 1272. Rushcliffe was also reckoned as a 'half wapentake.' Nomina Villarum,
printed in Parly. Writs (Rec. Com.), iv, 401.
221
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
held aj bovates in Sibthorpe which had passed to Ilbert can hardly be
other than the ' Pilewin ' who was one of the bishop's predecessors
in Elston. Across the Trent in Bassetlaw wapentake we find Fledborough
and Stokeham in the bishop's hands, the former certainly, and the latter in
all probability, as the gift of the Countess Godeva, who is given as the
former owner in each case, though Fledborough only is mentioned in the
writ by which the Conqueror confirmed her grants. One other bishop
appears among the tenants-in-chief in our county in the person of Odo of
Bayeux, the brother of the count of Mortain, and half-brother of the
Conqueror, but he held his lands in his lay capacity only, and in this
county they do not call for special remark.
The only religious house which held land in chief of the crown in
Nottinghamshire was Peterborough Abbey, and its holding was restricted
to the two manors of Collingham and North Muskham. The former is
surveyed in the ' Liber Niger ' of the abbey,1 from which we gather that its
population had risen in the fifty years which separates this document from
Domesday, its sokemen increasing from thirty-seven to fifty, and its villeins
from eight to twenty, while its bordars, sharing the general fate of their
class, vanished altogether. Domesday records two churches as existing in
the vill, which are still represented by the two parish churches of North
and South Collingham. The abbey's share of North Muskham was one of
the possessions which King William confirmed to Abbot Brand at the
very beginning of his reign. We are enabled to recover a little of its
early history through Hugh ' Candidus,' 2 who tells us that Abbot Brand
and his brothers Askill, Siward, and Siric, gave a number of lands to the
abbey, and at the head of his list stands ' Muskham on the other side the
Trent.' This explains an otherwise mysterious passage in the Lincoln-
shire ' clamores,' which runs : —
Scira testatur quod Aschil habebat ea die qua rex Edwardus fuit vivus et mortuus et
post haec tria maneria. Scotune, Scotre, et Ragenaltorp, in propria libertate de
rege Edwardo. Similiter habebat Muscham in Snotinghamscire.3
Now, on a strict reading of these passages, if Askil held Muskham on the
day of King Edward's death ' and afterwards,' while it was confirmed to
Peterborough by the Conqueror at the time (probably) of his coronation,
the grant must have taken place either in the reign of Harold, or during
the interregnum which followed the battle of Hastings. We might
even suggest that Askil gave the manor on the occasion of his brother
Brand becoming abbot of Peterborough, and this supposition is confirmed
by the wording of William's charter. He grants to the monastery ' at
the request of Abbot Brand,' ' all the lands belonging to his brothers or
kinsmen which they had under King Edward in hereditary right and
1 Chron. Petroburgense (Camden Soc.), 159.
• Ed. Sparke, p. 43. Hugh states the donor of Collingham to have been one Turkill
' Hoche,' who also gave the abbey its moneyer in Stamford and its land in Stamford (Baron),
Northamptonshire.
3 Dom. Bk., f. 3763.
222
DOMESDAY SURVEY
freely.' ' From the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle 2 we know that Brand had to
purchase this concession and his own recognition as abbot with 40 marks
of gold, but for our purpose it is more important that the above charter
confirms nine manors by name to the abbey, and that on turning back to
Hugh Candidus we find that he states every one of them to have been
given originally by Brand and his three brothers. It would seem, there-
fore, to have been a main object of the abbot in obtaining this very im-
portant charter to secure from the new king a detailed confirmation of
all the grants which he and his family had made in the doubtful time
between the death of Harold and William's own coronation. Incidentally
we may note that all this is welcome as confirming the general accuracy
of Hugh Candidus, whose twelfth-century narrative becomes important
from the facts which he alone gives as to the revolt of Hereward in the
summer of 1070."
After describing the ecclesiastical estates with which we have been
dealing, the survey at once proceeds to the possessions of the greatest of
Nottinghamshire landowners, Roger de Busli. Powerful in many counties,
he had no rival in the wide expanse of wild and largely forest country which
lies between the Idle and the Don, a district which included his castle of
Tickhill, Yorkshire, and the priory which he founded at Blyth (Notts.),
within two years after Domesday. ' Famous in Domesday but nowhere
else,' as Mr. Freeman said,* very little is known about him and his
family. He seems to have derived his name from Bully-le-Vicompte,
near Neufchatel (Seine Inferieure), where he appears some two years
before the Conquest as selling his tithes to the abbey of Holy Trinity,
Rouen.6 That he was infrequently in attendance on the king is proved
by the extreme rarity of his attestation to the writs and charters of the
reign. He died towards the close of the reign of William Rufus, and as
Roger, his only son, predeceased him, his lands, which formed a group
described indifferently in feudal documents as the honour of Blyth or of
Tickhill, escheated to the crown. When found, in virtue of re-grants,
in the hands of Robert of Belesme, in 1102, and of Earl John in 1191,
they play an important part in Nottinghamshire, and, indeed, in general
history, but one which lies too far from our present purpose for it to be
described here.
The Domesday map marks the general distribution of Roger de
Busli's estates. They were scattered over the whole of the county with
the exception of Broxtow wapentake, in which he did not hold a
single manor. As might be expected, they became more and more
compact as we approach the Yorkshire border ; indeed, the only exceptions
to his tenure between the latter and the River Idle were some fragments
of the king's sokeland of Bothamsall and Mansfield.
Most of Roger's predecessors in this large territory had been quite
undistinguished men. It is equally uncertain whether the ' Morcar '
1 The charter is printed in the Monasticon, \, 383, and discussed by Mr. Round in the Commune of
London, p. 29, where its date is determined.
1 Sub anno 1066. * See also Feudal England, 163.
4 English Towns and Districts, p. 363. 5 Round, Cal. Doc. France, 23.
223
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
who had held Gunthorpe was the earl of Northumbria, or whether the
' Tosti ' who had held part of Bingham was his dispossessed predecessor
in that earldom. Elsi the son of Caschin, who is stated on folio 280^ to
have held sac and soc over Worksop, duly appears on folio 285 as the
former owner there, but this seems to be the limit of possible identifica-
tions. On the other hand the fief supplies us with some extremely good
examples of the division of vills, not into parcels of sokeland, but into
distinct manors, the former owners of which are usually specified by
name. When this is not the case they are invariably described collec-
tively as ' thegns,' a fact which is important, for the majority of these
people must have been of very lowly rank with little except their per-
sonal status to mark them off from the larger class of sokemen around
them. Moreover there are some valuable entries in which we read not
only of the thegn but of his hall (aula). Thus we are told that at Eaton
ten thegns, at Carlton in Lindrick six thegns, at Headon Godric and six
other thegns had each his hall.1 Such cases are interesting, for it is to
the hall that we must look if we wish to find the old English equivalent
of the Anglo-Norman manerium ; 2 while on the other hand the estates
on which these halls were seated might well be considered far too small
to admit of anything resembling the later manorial organization. Thus
Eaton and Carlton in Lindrick contained only 4 plough-lands each and
Headon 53 ; at Normanton upon Trent ' five thegns, Justan, Durand,
Elward, Ulmar, Aseloc, had each his hall and ii bovates of land each
(assessed) to the geld,' and in the neighbouring vill of Weston, ' Elmar,
Elwi, Osbern, Grim, Edric, Steinulf had each his hall and 6 bovates
between them.' However faintly the fiscal responsibility of the manor
may have reflected its real capacity, no allowance reasonably to be made
for this will materially increase the size of their units ; Normanton had
been worth 10 shillings as a whole, Carlton in Lindrick and Headon £4
each, and if Eaton was estimated at £6 before the Conquest this would
only give an average value of 10 shillings for each of its manors. Other
small but seemingly independent estates from the same quarter of the
county occur at Rampton and Gringley on the Hill, where there had
been seven manors, Misterton and Wheatley divided into five, Ordsall
and Fenton into four. The account of the latter is important, for it
shows us the existence of private jurisdiction on one of these small pre-
Conquest manors. Three of the four manors in Fenton are surveyed
together, but a separate entry is made of the fourth, which runs : —
Ibidem habebat Speravoc ii bovatas terrae et ii partes unius bovatae ad geldum.
Terra i carucae cum saca et soca sine aula.
This may fairly be quoted as a counter instance to Professor Mait-
land's Cheshire manor which is said to have its pleas in its lord's court;3
for if the latter passage suggests that it was an exceptional thing for a
1 At Epperstone and Woodborough in the fief of Ralf de Limesi, the scribe after giving the names of
Ralf's two English predecessors has added the words ' non aulam ' over the second name.
' Domesday Book and Beyond, 109. 3 Domesday Book and BiyonJ, 91.
224
DOMESDAY SURVEY
' lord ' to hold his court in his hall we might certainly gather from the
Fenton case that it was no less exceptional for a man to have jurisdiction
over a manor without possessing a court in which it could be exercised.
Also this particular manor, rated at 2§ bovates, and valued T.R.E. at
ioj. 8*/., does not look like a promising field for private jurisdiction of
any kind, though it is only fair to add that ' Speravoc ' seems to have
been distinctly a more important man than his fellows. In the three
other Fenton estates, indeed, the Nottinghamshire manor seems to reach
its lowest point — the three together had only been rated at i J bovates,
and valued at 5 shillings, but Sperhavoc had also held part of Sturton-le-
Steeple and the whole of West Burton with its sokeland in Everton and
Harwell. However, we have no need to make this qualification in the
case of ' Ulmer ' of Clarborough, who in 1086 held as a king's thegn
ij bovates in that vill, like Sperhavoc in Fenton 'with sac and soc with-
out a hall.' Ulmer's manor was only worth 2s., and there is nothing
known to connect him with any other vill, while ' Ulchil,' who had also
held part of Clarborough and had like Ulmer survived the Conquest,
though only as under-tenant to Roger de Busli, had exercised sac and soc
over land assessed at half a bovate, and worth no more than i6d. We
may suspect that these small manors seemed as great an anomaly to the
compilers of Domesday as they seem to us, for a great and general con-
solidation of the manorial system had taken place between 1066 and the
date of the survey.1
The under-tenants whom Roger de Busli had enfeoffed on his estates
are somewhat less shadowy persons than their English predecessors. The
highly important charter which Roger granted to his new foundation of
Blyth * was witnessed by a number of his ' men,' several of whom may
be recognized in Domesday. The Fulk de Lisors (Lusoris] of the charter,
for instance, appears with his full name at Breaston in Derbyshire, and
as Fulco simply at Gotham, Eaton, Weston, Clayworth, Clarborough, and
Harworth in our county. For two generations his manors descended
in his male line and then passed to the constables of Chester, several
donations to Blyth Priory marking the process of the descent. The
charter also warns us of the confusion that may arise from the fact of
two under-tenants bearing the same name, for it distinguishes ' Thorald,'
brother of Fulk de Lusoris from Thorald de Chevercort, founder of an
important early Nottinghamshire family, both of whom appear in the survey
simply as ' Turold.' It was very possibly the former of these men who held
at Hodsock ; at any rate the Lisors family and their tenants appear there
very soon after Domesday, but the ' Turold ' who held the next vill of
Carlton in Lindrick was undoubtedly Turold de Chevercort. Ralf de
Chevercort, probably his son, gave land in Carlton to Worksop Priory,
and his deed of gift was witnessed by Ernald the son of Claron,3 whom
we may safely connect with the Claron of Roger de Busli's charter to
1 See VinogradofF, The Growth of the Manor, 299-300.
1 Mon. Angl. iv, 623.
* Abstract in Thoroton, History of Nottinghamshire, ed. Throsby, iii, 408-9.
I 225 29
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Blyth and the Domesday under-tenant at West Markham and Elkesley.
The Ralf ' Novifori ' of Roger's charter bore a name which occurs fre-
quently in the documents of Roche Abbey, but unless he was the Ralf
who held at Elton, which is improbable, he does not appear in our
portion of the survey.
It is rather surprising that there is no evidence directly to connect
the great family of ' Luvetot,' the lords of Sheffield and of Worksop and
many other manors in this shire with any Domesday under-tenant in our
county. But before 1 1 20, William de Luvetot had founded Worksop
Priory, and granted to it ' all the churches of his demesne ' of the honour
of Blyth, that is the churches of Gringley, Misterton, Walkeringham,
Normanton (upon Trent), Car Colston, Willoughby on the Wolds, Wysall,
and his part of the church of Treswell.1 Now on referring to Domesday
we find that in six out of these eight places the under-tenant is given as
Roger, Roger (de Busli)'s man, Misterton is said to be held by ' Roger,'
which may, of course, stand either for the tenant or his overlord, and the
holder of Willoughby is not stated. If we cannot argue directly from
this as to the relationship of ' Roger ' and William de Luvetot, the com-
pleteness with which the former's group of manors had passed to the
latter is nevertheless very suggestive, especially in view of the probability
that Roger the under-tenant may be identical with Roger de Luvetot,
who is addressed in several writs belonging to the early years of Henry I
and relating to South Yorkshire.2
Returning again to the foundation charter of Blyth Priory, we
should certainly note one very exceptional and important feature which
it contains. In making his gift to his monks Roger grants them ' the
entire vill of Blyth with all its appurtenances and customs as the men of
that vill used to perform them, that is, to plough (arare), to do carrying
service (kariare) , to mow (falcare) , reap (bladum secare) , make hay (foenum
facere), pay merchet (merchetum dare), and to make the mill pool (stagnum
molendini facere}' He also grants 'all the dignities (dignitates) which
I used to enjoy in that vill, that is soc and sac and toll and team
and infangenethef, iron and ditch and gallows with the other liberties
(libertates), which I then held from the king.' Now this charter is dated
1088, and it is probable that we do not possess another outline of
the services done by the men of a vill to a lay tenant-in-chief, and of
his rights over them, so nearly contemporary with Domesday. In fact
we have here some of the most characteristic features of the later manorial
labour system, and this although Blyth in Domesday is merely entered
as sokeland of Hodsock, two miles distant, and contained no demesne of
its own. At Blyth, the only population consisted of four villeins and
four bordars, and it is precisely as to the services performed by men of
these classes that Domesday is most silent, while such information as it
does give relates almost entirely to the west of England. It is, of course,
unfortunate though inevitable that our charter merely indicates the
nature of these services and tells us nothing of their quantity ; but if the
1 Mm. Angl. v, 1 18. ! Ibid, viii, 1 179.
226
DOMESDAY SURVEY
reaping, mowing, and hay-making were of necessity confined to one
season of the year, the carrying service and the ploughing, to say nothing
of the work on the mill-dam, were not so restricted. This early occur-
rence of ' merchet,' the especial test of servile status at a later period,
deserves particular notice.1
As to the lord's powers of jurisdiction the phrase ' sicut tune temporis
tenebam de rege ' is noteworthy, for as Professor Maitland says, ' whether
the Conqueror or either of his sons would have admitted that any justice
could be done in England that was not his justice, we may fairly doubt.' 2
We could especially wish to know how many of these ' franchises ' had
been possessed by ' Ulsi,' the pre-Conquest owner of Hodsock, to which,
as we have seen, Blyth was appurtenant. The manner in which the survey
is drawn up in Nottinghamshire implies that the relation between a manor
and its soke had existed before 1066, but the whole question is too wide
to be discussed here. In the case of Blyth it is complicated by the fact
that that vill contained no sokemen in 1086, and in a case of this kind
Professor Maitland would suspect that there has been some depression of
the peasantry.3 Certainly, as might be expected, sokemen are charac-
teristic of sokeland, but it would be easy to carry this argument too far.
Roger de Busli's fief contains some instances to the point. He held
widely in Oswardbeck wapentake, and we have seen that the king
possessed much of this wapentake as ' sokeland ' belonging to his manor
of Mansfield. If, therefore, we turn to those vills which are surveyed
partly as royal sokeland and partly as manors on Roger de Busli's fief,
we may arrange their population in the following table :
Sokeland Manors
Sokemen Villeins Honiara Sokemen Villeins BorJars
Gringley on the Hill .6 i i 0106
561 085
• 13 2 3 415
6 i o 4 25 o
. 24 II 7 2 22
12 i 18 3 o 3
211 O 8 I
Misterton
Walkeringham
Wheatley
Sturton-le-Steeple
Clayworth
Clarborough .
These figures show that general distribution of sokemen which was
to be expected; they constitute 55 per cent, of the population on the
sokeland as against nearly 15 per cent, on the manors. On the other
hand, the fact that 23 villeins appear in the former and 13 sokemen
in the latter reminds us that these classes were too nearly related in
economic position for them to be mutually exclusive ; they were rather
differentiated by varieties of tenure and customary service than by any
fundamental distinctions of origin or status.
One of the four typical ' escheats ' mentioned in Magna Carta was
the honour of Nottingham, which is represented in Domesday by the fief
of William Peverell. The origin alike of the man and of his name is
1 This charter deserves re-editing. The Monasticm copy omits the witnesses, who have to be
supplied from the abstract given by Thoroton, Hist of Notts, iii, 494.
1 Dom. Bk. and Beyond, 85. ' 'Ibid.
227
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
very obscure, but he occurs early in the history of the Conquest in
connexion with our county, for it was to him that the Conqueror
entrusted the castle which he built at Nottingham in 1068 when on his
way to put down the first revolt of the north.1 William Peverel's lands
form a compact group in the western half of the shire, covering all the
roads leading from west and south to the county-town and its stronghold.
He held nearly the whole of Broxtow wapentake, if we except the royal
manors of Mansfield and Orston and some unimportant estates mostly
belonging to ' king's thegns,' his possessions being continued across the
Trent by the manor and soke of Clifton. This last is an interesting
estate, for two lines were devoted to it at the end of the statement of the
customs of Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire to the effect that ' over the
soke which belongs to Clifton the earl ought to have the third part of all
customs and works.' * As there was no earl of Nottinghamshire at this
time, these dues must have been in the king's hand unless he had made
an unrecorded grant of them to anybody. Clifton had belonged to a
former owner of comital rank, though one unconnected with any earldom
in which Nottingham ever lay, in the Countess ' Code ' or Gytha who
had preceded William Peverel in several counties, notably Buckingham-
shire and Northamptonshire. She was the wife of Earl Ralf of Hereford
and must be carefully distinguished from her namesake Gytha, the wife
of Earl Godwine, and from the better known wife of Earl Leofric, the
Countess Godeva (Godgifu) of Mercia.3 We may also recognize our
countess in the ' Code ' whose manor of Edwalton, 3 miles from
Clifton, had passed to Hugh de Grentemaisnil, the greatest landowner in
Leicestershire. Although she is mentioned there without any mark of
title we may be quite certain of the identification, for Edwalton is said
to belong to Stockerston, Leicestershire, and on turning to that place in
the Leicester Domesday * we find that it, like Wigston Magna, which
had also passed to Hugh de Grentemaisnil, had belonged to Earl Ralf.
Returning to the soke of Clifton we may notice that it lay along the
right bank of the Trent opposite Nottingham, including Wilford, West
Bridgford, Bassingfield, Gamston, and Adbolton with one or two
outliers along the wolds, and that its value must be included in the
figures given for Clifton itself, since £16 would be an impossible value
for a Nottinghamshire manor rated at 2j carucates and reported to
contain only five ploughlands.
Like his rival Roger de Busli, William Peverel founded a priory
on his Nottinghamshire estates. Early in the reign of Henry I he
established a house of Cluniac monks at Lenton under the shadow of
Nottingham Castle. His selection of a site for his priory is rather
curious, for in 1086 he merely held Lenton in custodia, that is, probably,
on the king's behalf as his bailiff or agent.6 He held the whole of the
1 Ordtrkus Vit*Rt (Soc. de la Hist, dc France), iv, 184. ' Dom. Bk. f. 280*.
^ See V. C. H. Northants, \, 289. « Dom. Bk. f. 232.
5 See for the meaning of custodia Appendix I in Round, Geoffrey de Mandevlllt, and for Peverel's
tenure of the royal demesne in the Peak V. C. H. Derb. \, 303.
228
DOMESDAY SURVEY
royal demesne in the Peak of Derbyshire on the same terms, as also
Awsworth and Eastwood (Notts.), while we have seen that when he
appears in 1068 in connexion with Nottingham Castle it is merely as
the king's representative. It was Henry I who gave him definite
possession of his lands in the Peak with which he richly endowed Lenton
Priory, bestowing on it also besides Lenton itself the adjoining vills of
Radford, Morton, and Kighton,1 with his portion of Newthorpe and
Papplewick and Courteenhall in mid-Northamptonshire. His under-
tenants followed their lord's example, and among the list of donors given
in William's foundation charter2 we may notice several names which occur
in the Nottingham survey. Thus the Saped who gave two-thirds of his
demesne tithes in Empingham (Rutland) and Baseford may be identified
with the Saped. who appears as William's tenant in the latter vills, and
the ' Pagan ' who was Saped's co-tenant at Baseford must have been the
father of ' Robertus filius Pagani,' who also gave tithes there to Lenton.
A ' Goscelinus ' made a similar grant at Watnall to the priory, and we
may recognize him in the Gozelinus who with Grinchel, an Englishman,
held Watnall of William in Domesday. In the ' Thonethona ' of the
charter, strange as is the form of the name, we have the modern Toton
(near Long Eaton), and we discover the son of another Domesday tenant
in Robert the son of Warner, who made a grant of tithes there. Whether
the Domesday Warner, his father, was identical with the tenant of that
name at Wollaton and Codnor and Shirland, Derbyshire, must be un-
certain, but the name is not very common.8 Ambrose, who held under
William in Strelley and Bilborough, has been identified in several other
counties, notably Northamptonshire, as a Peverel under-tenant.
But William Peverel's estate in this county is also noteworthy for the
number of Englishmen who held of him in 1086. Their holdings may
most conveniently be expressed in tabular form : —
Name Held T. R. W. in :— Held T. R. E. in :—
'UnloP . . . Lenton . . . Lenton
Godwin the Priest . Strelley . . . Adbolton
. ., . f Greasley —
Ailnc . . . • i r> • i
(isnnsley —
ir> j i-rr T fCostock
1-, , . [ Radclifie on Trent . „
Jbredgis. . . . IT-V,, •( Rempston
(Tithby . . . I u j i-ff T
^Radclifte on Trent
Ulviet .... Radcliffe on Trent
/'Watnall \
Grinchitel 4 Newthorpe > . . Watnall
(Kimberley )
1 Already in Thoroton's time the two latter places were absorbed in Lenton.
* Man. Angl. v, ill.
3 The tithes of Stapleford were given to the priory by Geoffrey (de) Heriz, the founder of a branch
of this family which, according to the Newstead Register, died out early in the male line. The Domes-
day under-tenant is given as Robert, who may have been Robert de Heriz, the head of the main line
of the family. Tithes in Gonalston were given by ' Erbertus,' whom we may probably identify with
the ' Herbert Peverel ' of a Lenton charter given in Round, Cat. Doc. France, 506, and with the Herbert
styled by Wm. Peverel miles metis, who gave to the priory one of the four mills of Lenton. The
tenant of Gonalston is not given in Domesday.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Here we see that even those Englishmen who continued to hold land
after the Conquest suffered some disturbance and reduction of their
tenure. We might perhaps add to the list but for the carelessness of the
Domesday scribes in recording the names of Englishmen, an extra-
ordinary instance of which occurs at Lenton. The former owner is
given as ' Unlof,' but directly afterwards we read Ibi isdem Ulnod babet,
etc. We certainly dare not have assumed Ulnod and Unlof to be the
same man without this distinct statement to that effect, but in its light
we may probably recognize him in the Ulnod who is said to hold at
Radford (adjoining Lenton) ' i bovate in thegnland.' It is perhaps
worth noting that in none of these seven cases is the Englishman described
after the normal fashion as William Peverel's ' man ' ; the almost equi-
valent formula (Fredgis) tenet sub or de Willelmo is used instead.
Two and a half columns of our survey are assigned to Walter de
Aincurt, the kinsman of Bishop Remigius of Lincoln and the lord of
Granby, whose principal seat was at Braunstone, Lincolnshire. Although
the fact is somewhat obscured by the plan of the survey, his estates
formed a roughly continuous group extending from his west Lincolnshire
possessions, through Staunton, Gotham, Granby, and Flintham, to a
number of manors on the left bank of the Trent, comprising the whole
of Thurgarton, Hoveringham, and Bulcote, with part of Fiskerton and
Rolleston. One of his under-tenants, the Mager who held in Staunton,
deserves notice as the ancestor of the Nottinghamshire family of Staunton,
who, however, appear later as holding of the lords of Belvoir in virtue
of a grant made by Oliver de Aincurt to William de Albini the younger.1
In each of his Nottinghamshire manors, except Granby, and in most of
his Derby and Lincoln possessions, Walter de Aincurt had been preceded
by one or both of two Englishmen, called Swegen and Tori, of whom
nothing else is known ; but the case of Granby is peculiar. It was by far
his most valuable manor in Derbyshire or Nottinghamshire, and he is
said to have possessed sac and soc over it.8 Its former owner had been a
certain Haminc who does not appear elsewhere in Nottinghamshire, but
occurs in the list of those who had held sac and soc in Lincolnshire, and
also as Walter's predecessor at Branston and Blankney in that county.8 A
considerable amount of sokeland belonging to Granby was scattered
over the neighbouring vills, over which Haminc had doubtless exercised
powers of jurisdiction before the Conquest. Domesday reveals a church
at Granby, and the register of St. Mary's Abbey, York, shows us Walter
de Aincurt granting his tithes there and at Gotham, Knapthorpe, Hick-
ling, and Thurgarton to that foundation.4 But the Aincurt fief, like all
the greater fiefs in our county, afterwards supplied an endowment for a
religious house of its own, for Ralph de Aincurt, Walter's son, founded
an Augustinian priory at Thurgarton between 1114 and 1140. We
may, in passing, note one curious detail concerning the Aincurt estates ;
they had risen in value in face of a general depreciation throughout the
1 Thoroton, Hut. of Notts. \, 305. * Dom. Bk. f. 28o3.
' Ibid. £.361. < Mm. Angl. iii, 549.
230
DOMESDAY SURVEY
shire. As the value of his lands in Derbyshire and Lincolnshire had
also risen since the Conquest, Walter de Aincurt may have the credit
of being a discreet and skilful landlord.
The next fief entered in our survey was that of Geoffrey Alselin,
whose chief manor in our county was Laxton, which afterwards became
the head of the Everingham barony. Laxton, to which pertained nine
pieces of sokeland, had belonged to Geoffrey's regular predecessor in this
and other counties, ' Tochi ' (Toki) the son of Outi,1 who appears
among those who had exercised sac and soc before the Conquest. It
may be convenient to note here that all the more important groups of
sokeland in our county, such as Laneham, Sutton, Newark, Clifton,
Granby, and this of Laxton, are connected by their pre-Conquest owners
with rights of jurisdiction existing in King Edward's time.2 If we
include the king in our calculation, we can account for nearly four-fifths
of the recorded sokeland of Nottinghamshire. This is important, for it
makes it possible that the word ' sokeland ' may here at least have meant
what by derivation it implies, and that in these cases we may find a
fairly definite bond of union between manor and soke in jurisdictional
rights centred in the former. It is necessary to keep this question well
apart from the distinct problem, whether a thegn who possessed one or
two manors had ' sac and soc ' over them where the fact is not directly
stated ; and if we believe that such powers of jurisdiction must have
taken their origin from a royal grant, we must make a very large allow-
ance for our deficiency of information respecting the Anglo-Saxon
thegnhood in estimating the prevalence of private justice before 1066.
We may pass more rapidly over the tenants-in-chief who remain,
for their Nottinghamshire estates were for the most part mere appen-
dages of large possessions elsewhere. Thus Geoffrey de Wirce, Osbern
fitz Richard, Durand and Robert Malet, and Hugh de Grentemaisnil
only held one manor, and William the Usher, Robert the son of William,
Henry de Ferrers and Hugh fitz Baldric, only two manors apiece in our
county. Ralf fitz Hubert has been considered in the Victoria County
History of Derbyshire, where he was lord of Crich. He held some nine
manors in the west of Nottinghamshire, and here, as in Derbyshire, he
had succeeded two Englishmen named Leofric and Leofnoth. Gilbert
de Gand had come into possession of a compact estate in the centre of
the county, most of which had belonged to the Ulf ' fenisc,' who had
held 'the earl's third penny' in Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire. In the
description of Gilbert's Nottinghamshire lands, Ulf is not assigned his
distinguishing adjective, but in six cases out of eight a space is left
vacant after his name, and the uniformity with which his possessions in
other counties had passed to Gilbert leaves no room for doubt as to his
1 V. C. H. Nortkants, \, 292.
' It should be noted that the famous list on f. 280^ is not quite consistent as to date, for while the
majority of names given in it are those of pre-Conquest owners, it also includes Walter de Aincurt and
Henry de Ferrers. It is just possible, however, that the list may really refer, as a whole, not to the
tempore regis Edwardi but to some time early in the Conqueror's reign, before the great confiscation
of Englishmen's lands had been thoroughly carried out.
23I
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
identification. The most interesting of Gilbert's possessions are the two
manors which he held in Eakring, for they probably represent the
partition of one estate between co-heirs. Thus each of them was assessed
at 6 bovates and 2 plough-lands, each contained 3 acres of meadow, and
woodland 6 furlongs in length and 4 in breadth, and each had fallen in
value from £i to i6j. Their former owners, however, had undergone
different fates, for while one of them, ' Ingolf,' was replaced by ' William,
Gilbert's man,' the other, ' Echebrand,' continued to hold his share as
Gilbert's under-tenant.
The small fief of Gilbert Tison was more directly connected with
Nottinghamshire, for it appears later as the honour of Averham (Egrum).1
In addition to Averham and one or two adjoining vills, it included
Finningley, the most northerly manor in the county, and had nearly all
belonged to one Swegen. The description of it is noteworthy in one
respect, for it incidentally mentions one of those mysterious ' senior
thegns ' in whose functions in the local courts Professor Stubbs sought
to discover the germs of the jury of presentments. The entry in
question runs : —
In Wicheburne [Winkburn], habuit Suain xii bovatas terrae ad geldum . . .
Duas bovatas de hac terra tenuerunt v taini. Unus eorum erat senior aliorum, que
(sic) non pertinuit ad suain.3
This passage unfortunately is by no means clear, but the que is
probably a short and obscure expression for cujus terra. Without making
conjectures as to the meaning of the ' seniority ' of this thegn, we may
note that Swegen himself must have been an important man, for the
entry seems to imply that the land of four of these five thegns had
' belonged ' to him. It is perhaps worth while making the guess (it is
no more) that he may have been the Swen the son of Suave who appears
on folio 280$ as a former possessor of sac and soc.
The survey of Ralf de Limesi's land contains a reference to a unit
of land-measurement sufficiently rare in the north of England to be
worth a note. In the account of Epperstone we are told ' Ibi Radulfus
habet in dominio iii carucas et xiiii sochmanni de vi bov' et ferding hujus
terrae,' and over ' ferding ' the scribe has added the words ' i bov ' in
explanation. The 'ferding' would seem to represent the 'fertinus ' or
' farthing ' which occurs frequently in the survey of the south-western
counties, where it represented the quarter of a virgate,8 whereas at Epper-
stone it was apparently the quarter of a bovate ; unless indeed the inter-
lineation is not explanatory but intended to correct the ' ferthing ' into
' bovate.'
A folio of our survey is assigned to Ilbert de Lacy the lord of
Pontefract, and it also contains an entry which looks as if it would be
1 See the charter of Henry de Hose, the successor of the Tisons, to Thurgarton Priory, addressed
'Omnibus sanctae matris ecclesiae fidelibus et maxime hominibus honoris de Egrum.' Man.
Angl. vi, 191.
1 Folio. 291, quoted by Maitland, DmesJay Book and Beyond, 165, and Vinogradoff, The Growth
of the Manor, p. 287.
3 Domeiday Book and Beyond, 479.
232
DOMESDAY SURVEY
interesting if it were only intelligible. Godric and Ulviet had held
4 bovates in Cropwell Butler which had passed to Ilbert, but when
Roger of Poitou, who possessed a much larger manor in the same vill,
received his land he appropriated Ilbert's share in addition to his own.
The wapentake (of Bingham) bore witness that Ilbert had received
seisin, and when Domesday was compiled the manor was in the king's
hand ' praeter terciam partem et tainum qui est caput manerii, quem
tenet Ilbertus.' It seems impossible to translate these last words so as to
make sense, for one does not see how a thegn could be a ' capital
messuage' (caput manerii)^ nor indeed how Ilbert could 'hold' him.
Doubtless there is a mistake here, unless possibly ' tainum ' is used for
' tainagium,' the thegn and his thegnland being taken as equivalent ; but
at any rate we have an illustration of the action of the wapentake court
in suits as to the possession of land, and we also notice the importance
attached even thus early to proof of actual possession or ' seisin.'
Small as were the Nottinghamshire possessions of Henry de Ferrers
and Osbern fitz Richard, the description of them involves a curious
topographical difficulty in each case. It is rather surprising to find
Osbern fitz Richard holding land so far east as Nottinghamshire, for the
head of his barony was at Richard's Castle in Herefordshire. In our
county he is assigned a manor in Granby which had formerly belonged
to earl ./Elfgar, together with 3^ bovates in Wiverton and 6 in Salterford.
But the difficulty in the case is occasioned by the statement that Osbern's
holding in Wiverton was ' sokeland,' and his 6 bovates in Salterford
formed a ' berewick ' in ' Coletone.' Now Osbern's manor in Granby
was held of him by Robert de Oilly, the greatest lay tenant in Oxford-
shire, and our difficulty arises from the fact that there seems to be no
evidence later than Domesday to connect Granby with the honours
either of Richard's Castle or Wallingford, which represent the fiefs of
Osbern fitz Richard and Robert de Oilly respectively ; the whole vill
belonging to the Aincurts. On the other hand the ' carta ' of Geoffrey
Ridel in 1166 shows us the Bassets holding Colston Basset, which in all
probability represents the ' Coletone ' above, of the honour of Walling-
ford,1 and we also know that they had entered into possession there before
1 12 1.3 It would seem therefore that either the account of Colston
Basset is altogether omitted from the survey, or else that we have its
description in the entry which is above attributed to Granby, the name
being a mistake on the part of the Domesday scribes, either alternative
of course implying carelessness on the part of the latter.3 An even more
inexplicable case occurs on the fief of Henry de Ferrers, who held one
bovate in Willoughby on the Wolds, of which we read ' soca in
Badeleie.' The only known name in the county which can represent
the latter is Bathley, to the north-east of Newark, but this was merely a
1 Red Book of the Exch. (Rolls Ser.), 331.
' See the charters relating to the priory of Laund, Leicestershire (Man. Angl. vi, 1 8 8).
3 An additional complication is caused by the fact that the only ' Salterford ' in the county lies
near Calverton north of the Trent, and is 13 miles distant from Colston Basset.
I 233 30
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
hamlet of North Muskham, and was chiefly in the hands of the chapter
of Southwell. In connexion with Henry de Ferrers we may safely
identify the Siward who preceded him at East and West Leake and
Bonnington with the Siward 'barn,' who in 1070 joined Hereward and
his fellow malcontents in the Isle of Ely.1
The last two folios of the Nottinghamshire survey are devoted to
those Englishmen who had survived the Conquest and form the class of
' king's thegns.' They are interesting people, for they seem to be
holding their lands in 1086 on conditions of tenure very similar to those
which had prevailed generally over the county in the time of King
Edward, and in Nottinghamshire their number is unusually great. On
analysis, however, it turns out to be not quite so great as might be
supposed at first sight, for two or three thegns stand out prominently
above their fellows. By far the most interesting of this class was one
Alden or Healfdene, who held as much land of the king in Nottingham-
shire as did Roger of Poitou or Ralf fitz Hubert. As a king's thegn he
held manors in Cromwell, Carlton upon Trent, Knapthorpe, Lambley,
Woodborough, Trowell, Awsworth, Lambcote, Kelham, and Widmer-
pool, and he was probably the Alden who held part of Normanton upon
Soar of the count of Mortain. But his peculiar importance arises from
the fact that he was the ancestor of the mediaeval lords Cromwell, who
without attaining the highest regions of statesmanship played a creditable
part in English history before the extinction of their male line in the
time of Henry VI. If it should be found possible to connect the great
Protector with this family, the interest attaching to our ' Aldene ' as his
earliest recorded ancestor would of course be greatly increased. It is
worth noting that in eight of his manors ' Aldene ' had been preceded
by an Englishman styled in different entries Ulchel, Ulchet, and Ulchete.
Eight manors, Normanton upon Trent, Elkesley, Clarborough, Ordsall,
Chilwell, Trowell, Gonalston, and Misson, were held by a certain Ernui,
sometimes, but it seems indifferently, styled ' presbiter ' in an interlinea-
tion.2 Unlike Aldene, he had held land in this shire before the Conquest,
and he appears prominently in the Domesday account of Lincoln, where
he held a messuage which had belonged to Earl Morcar. He also held
ij bovates in Flintham of Roger de Busli.3 It is curious that at some
period after 1070 the county had possessed a sheriff of this name, for an
Earnwi or Earnwig is addressed as such in two of the Conqueror's writs
relating to Nottinghamshire affairs.*
A third thegn, holding a smaller but more compact estate, was the
' Sawin ' who possessed part of Gotham, Kingston and Barton in Fabis
with the whole of Ratcliffe upon Soar. It will be evident that the
subtraction of these three estates from the total possessions of the king's
thegns in Nottinghamshire will materially reduce the number of the
. i, 282.
' For a notice of Ernui the priest see V. C. H. Lanes. \, 275.
* Man. Angl. iii, 20.
4 Writs, in Anglo-Saxon, in the Eynsham Chartulary, shortly to be published by the Oxford
Hist. Soc.
234
\
<.
DOMESDAY SURVEY
latter who were independent landholders, and will to that extent invali-
date the conclusions which Professor Freeman based upon their presence
in our county. The professor made the presence or absence of king's
thegns the test by which to determine whether a county had submitted
peaceably or the reverse to the Conqueror, and he argued that the
presence of the class in such considerable numbers in Nottinghamshire
showed that the king's favour had been bought by an early submission
on the part of the shire to his rule.1 But apart from the question of
mere numbers it has been shown in other volumes of this series that the
king's thegns were considered to be of inferior status to the tenants in
chief by military service, and even in this county the number of
Englishmen holding land in 1086 bears a very small proportion to the
great crowd of the disinherited.3
The position of the borough of Nottingham in the survey deserves
notice, for it reflects one of the most important facts in the history of
the shire. Until the reign of Elizabeth Nottinghamshire was united
with Derbyshire under one sheriff, and from a chance reference in the
Domesday account of Derby borough to ' the witness of the two shire
courts ' we know that this arrangement must already have prevailed in
1086.* The association of the counties is implied in the order in which
their surveys are entered in Domesday, for the account of Derbyshire
comes first, followed on folio 280 by the descriptions of Nottingham
and Derby, to each of which a column is assigned ; the next folio, which
is devoted to certain customs relating to the two counties jointly, being
succeeded by the survey of Nottinghamshire. It is rather important to
follow carefully the structure of the account which is given of Nottingham
itself. First comes the description of the borough as it stood in the
Confessor's time, with special reference to its agricultural condition, and
to the king's fiscal rights there. Next we have an account of some
changes which took place in the borough between the Conquest and
1086, and then comes the usual description of the state of things existing
at the date of the survey, with a specification of those who held houses
in the borough. This is followed by the account of a small agricultural
estate which the king possessed in Nottingham, and then in reality begins
the statement of general customs with which the reverse of the folio is
occupied.
Like the great majority of English boroughs Nottingham was
' farmed ' or set to rent as a single whole, and as generally was the case
its 'ferm' had been largely increased by the Conqueror.* In King
1 Norman Conquest, iv, 197.
1 This point has been considered in the V. C. H. Northants, \, 294 ; and Derb. i, 307.
* On this ground Mr. Round has suggested (Geoffrey de Mandeviilt, 193) that the Ferrers earldom
consisted of the joint shrievalty of Notts, and Derby, and that this was the reason why Nottingham
never became a separate earldom before Richard II conferred the title on Thomas Mowbray. If we
can trust the copy given in the Mart, (vi, 97) the connexion of the two counties is proved by the
foundation charter of Bredon Priory, Leicestershire, where Earl Robert de Ferrers appears as ' Robertas
comes de Notingham.'
4 On the payments made by boroughs in 1086 see Mr. Round's paper on Domesday finance in
Domesday Studies.
235
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Edward's time it had paid £18, but in 1086 it is found debited with
£30, and an additional payment of £10 from tne mint. The 'ferm' of
Derby had likewise been brought up to £30 from £24, while that of
Lincoln and Leicester had stood at the former amount before the Con-
quest, but had been much increased. The pre-Conquest ' ferm ' of
Nottingham most probably included the proceeds of the mint, for follow-
ing the rent of the borough lands we read of a payment of £2 ' from
two moneyers.' This statement is interesting, for in the twelfth-century
pipe rolls we find that when one of the moneyers of a borough ceased to
work, a remission of £i was made from the 'ferm' of the borough on
this account, and the above passage carries this allowance of £1 to a
moneyer beyond the Conquest. Moreover the increase in the render of
the mint from £2 to £10 may fairly be taken to imply that a corres-
ponding increase in the trade of the borough had taken place since 1066.
The mint at Lincoln, however, rendered £75, and a proportionately
greater number of actual coins struck there have come down to us.
But in addition to its ' ferm ' a borough was usually assessed to the
geld in the same fashion as a rural manor, its assessment being repar-
titioned among the burgesses. The case of Nottingham is not quite
simple. To begin with, the amount of geld cast upon the borough is
very small, being only 6 carucates ; it was only 1 2 carucates at Derby,
the case of which is parallel in several points with that of Nottingham.1
Then the wording of the survey deserves attention : ' To this borough
there belong six carucates of land (assessed) to the king's geld, and one
meadow and underwood 6 furlongs in length and 5 in breadth. This
land was divided among 38 burgesses, and from the rent of the land and
the works of the burgesses rendered 75 shillings and sevenpence.' Now
this entry does not read like a statement of assessment of the borough as
a whole, but has rather the form of a description of an agricultural estate
' belonging ' indeed to the borough, but held in fact by only a relatively
small number of its burgesses. As the total number of the latter had
been 173 we see clearly enough the presence of a landholding class
within the urban community, and we seem entitled to ask the question
whether the fiscal responsibility of the borough had not been borne in
practice by those burgesses only who possessed a share in the borough lands,
especially in view of the reappearance of a precisely similar phenomenon
at Derby. For the gulf is wide between the assessment of Nottingham
and Derby at 6 and 12 carucates, and that of Cambridge at 100 hides,
of Bedford and Huntingdon at 50 each, and (to return to the Danelaw)
of Stamford at 150 carucates. Lastly, later in the same column, there
occurs an entry which, to all appearance, relates to the geldable land of
the borough — ' Burgenses habent vi carucatas terra ad arandum et xx
bordarios et xiii carucas.' Here, then, we see the above 6 fiscal carucates
represented by an equal number of field carucates actually cultivated by
the burgesses and their dependents.
1 V. C. H. Derb. \, 308.
236
DOMESDAY SURVEY
The account of the borough land of Nottingham opens up another
interesting subject. One of these 6 carucates had been held by Earl
Tostig ' of the soke of whose land the king had two pennies and the earl
himself the third.' This entry has a definite bearing on the difficult
question of the earldom to which Nottinghamshire had belonged in the
time of Edward the Confessor. Professor Freeman, who had noticed
this passage, remarked that Tostig ' is not distinctly spoken of as
earl of the shire.'1 This no doubt is true, but when an earl is
found in possession of the third penny of land in a county town the
fact affords a reasonable presumption that he was the earl of the shire to
which the town belonged. Tostig's possession of Bothamsall, an im-
portant manor with much sokeland appurtenant, is also suggestive ;
such estates were not very common in Nottinghamshire, and the Con-
queror's retention of it in his own hand agrees well with the plan, which
we know him to have followed in other counties, of keeping for himself
the forfeited estates of the local earl.
At any rate Earl Tostig's land in Nottingham is of importance in
another connexion. At some uncertain date before 1086, Hugh fitz
Baldric was sheriff of this shire,2 and he established thirteen houses on the
land in question, although the population had fallen from 173 to 136.
An interlineation describes these houses as in novo burgo, a phrase which
gives us our first evidence for the existence of the ' French borough ' in
Nottingham. Similar ' new boroughs' had been founded in other towns,
as at Exeter and Northampton.3 The peculiarity of the Nottingham
case is that it accidentally affected our legal phraseology. The ' old
borough ' of Nottingham, so early as the beginning of the reign of
Henry I, had come to be described in contradistinction to the new
borough as the Anglicus burgus^ and in it the old English customs as to
the inheritance of land continued to prevail. In particular, that form of
succession according to which the youngest son succeeded to his father's
land was found there, and there seems to be no deeper reason for the
name, Borough English, which ever since the twelfth century has
attached to this kind of tenure.
Although five Nottinghamshire tenants in chief held houses in the
county town, we do not see any of that attribution of town houses to
country manors which was such a prominent feature of the survey of
Leicester. There is, therefore, no direct evidence in favour of the
' garrison theory ' of the borough to be gathered from Nottingham.* On
the other hand the survey of Nottingham contains one very characteristic
feature in the domus equitum, which appear in two entries. The word
eques is very rare in Domesday, and it seems as if it can have had no
other Anglo-Saxon equivalent but cnibt, a word which, by the eleventh
1 Norman Conquest, ii, 580.
* He figures as sheriff (of Yorkshire) before 1069 in the foundation legend of Selby Abbey.
Freeman, Norman Conquest, iv, 794.
' V. C. H. Northants, i, 276.
* See the section on ' the Borough ' in Domesday Book and Beyond, where particular reference is made
to Nottingham in 1200.
237
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
century at any rate, was undergoing a military specialization. When,
therefore, we read that ' Ralf de Burun has twelve knights' houses, in
one of which a merchant dwells,' we may be disposed to see a concrete
instance of the process, as a result of which, in Professor Maitland's
phrase, ' houses which should have been occupied by knights were occu-
pied by chapmen.'1 Twenty-five knights' houses are recorded, twelve
of which belonged to William Peverel, who, we may remark, had been
at least formerly in charge of Nottingham Castle, and thirteen, as we have
seen, to Ralf de Burun.
The one church which Domesday records in Nottingham was hand-
somely endowed. It possessed three ' messuages ' (mansiones) and 5 bovates
of borough land ' with sac and soc,' as well as 5 j acres, over which the
king exercised these rights, which also belonged to him in relation to
sixty-five houses situated ' in the priest's croft,' the total value of all these
possessions being £5 yearly. The foundation charter of Lenton Priory
carries the history of this church a stage further, for William Peverel
gives to his monks 'the church of St. Mary, of the English borough of
Nottingham, with all its appurtenances, by the grant of (his) lord King
Henry. >s These last words are explained by the statement in Domesday
that the church was situated in the king's demesne, and we may safely
identify it as the Norman predecessor of the present church of St. Mary.
Of more general interest is the statement that ' In Nottingham the
water of Trent and the Foss way (fossa), and the road towards York were
so guarded that if any one should hinder the passage of ships, or should
plough or make a ditch within two perches of the king's way, he should
pay a fine (emendare] of £8.' Nottingham stood in later times at the
head of the navigation of the Trent, and the commercial importance of
the river is illustrated by the permission which Henry I gave to Alex-
ander, bishop of Lincoln, of making a bridge over the Trent at his castle
of Newark, ' so that it may not hurt my city of Lincoln nor my borough
of Nottingham,'3 and also by the clause in Henry II's charter to the
burgesses of Nottingham, granting them rights of toll over all people
passing along the Trent from Thrumpton to Newark.4 The Lincolnshire
Domesday shows us other than mercantile travellers passing down the
river, for it was the duty of the men of Torksey to conduct the king's
messengers in their boats from the latter place to York.6 Much of the
trade of Nottingham was no doubt due to its situation at the point where
the Trent at or near its navigable limit was crossed by one of the great
highways running from north to south, the via versus Eboracum of
Domesday. There seem to have been two main ' through routes ' from
London to York, both of which intersected Nottinghamshire. The one
1 Domes Jay Book and Beyond, 1 96.
* Man. Angl. v, in. In 1538 the value of the tithes accruing to the priory from Nottingham
amounted to £3 5 1 8/. 8</.
* Man. Angl. viii, 1275.
4 Stevenson, Records of the Borough of Nottingham, \. The Domesday text is well illustrated by the
clause in the charter running ' Et iter de Trenta liberum esse debet navigantibus quantum pertica una
obtinebit ex utraque pane fili aquae.' 6 Dom. Bk. f. 337.
238
DOMESDAY SURVEY
in question was that which diverged from the Watling Street at Stony
Stratford, passed through Northampton and Leicester to Nottingham,
and continued through Blyth and Doncaster to York and the north.
We get a definition of its course in Nottinghamshire in the above-
mentioned charter to Nottingham, for the burgesses are granted toll ' a
Duito ultra Rempeston usque ad aquam de Radefud in Nor.' Duito is
explained by Mr. Stevenson as a shortened form of conductum, and refers
to the brook which for some five miles forms the southern boundary of
Nottinghamshire, and is crossed by the above road at Rempstone on its
entrance into the county.1 Similarly the road crosses the ' water at
Radford,' or river Ryton, at Blyth, a fact which helps to explain Roger de
Buslis' grant of toll, fair, and market there.3 The other road from the
south to York ran from London through Huntingdon to Lincoln, and
then, crossing the Trent at Littleborough, passed across the north-eastern
corner of Nottinghamshire, entering Yorkshire at Bawtry, and probably
joining the road from Leicester and Nottingham at the same place.3
A slight ambiguity attends the word fossa in the Domesday passage
quoted above. Mr. Ballard takes it to mean ' the city ditch';4 but there
does not appear to be any evidence in support of this. By Mr. Green
and his followers it is taken in close connexion with via versus Eboracum,
and translated ' the ditch and road that runs to York.' b But this
reading does not seem very natural, and in the translation below the
word is taken to mean ' the Foss Way.' This great road, running
from Lincoln to Leicester and the south-west, passed through the three
southern wapentakes of Nottinghamshire, and for 1 2 miles formed part
of the high road from Newark to Nottingham. The Lincoln Cathedral
charters show its position as a ' royal road.' In one of them the bishop
is allowed to divert the regia strata^ which goes through Newark, whither
he will.6 Mr. Stevenson has recently suggested that the words ' In
Snotingeham, aqua Trente .... custodiuntur ' in the above Domesday
passage may indicate ' some control over the county ' as belonging to the
burgesses of Nottingham.7 This may no doubt be so, but it is also
possible that the word scire was omitted after ' Snotingeham,' and that
the passage is merely indicating the manner in which the main lines of
communication running through the county were safeguarded.
On the whole the local geography of Nottinghamshire has exhibited
somewhat unusual stability. If we combine Domesday with the twelfth-
century chartularies which we possess there will be few hamlets in the
county which we cannot trace back to a period beyond 1 1 60, while a
still smaller number of the place-names mentioned in the survey have
passed altogether out of remembrance. In 1086 the county seems to
1 The copy of the charter given by Dr. Stubbs in his Select Charters, p. 167, reads ' usque ad aquam
de Radefud in Norhantesire,' but this is merely a wrong expansion of the Nor' of the original.
' ' Theloneum et passagium de Radefud usque in Thornewat' . . . feriam et merchatum in eadem
villa.' Man. Angl. iv, 623.
3 It was by this latter road that Harold marched south in 1066, and William in 1068.
4 The Domesday Boroughs, 85. 5 Conquest of England (ed. 1883), 439.
6 Man. Angl. viii, 1273. ' English Historical Review, April, 1905, p. 349.
239
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
have had precisely its present boundaries, a statement which is worth
making in view of the general belief that Nottinghamshire was com-
bined with Rutland in Domesday, and that its frontier accordingly
requires rectification.1 Now the south of Rutland was actually included
in the Domesday account of Northamptonshire, and several manors in north
Rutland are duplicated in the Lincolnshire Domesday, but the connexion
between Rutland and Nottinghamshire in 1086 was purely fiscal. The
district which is called Rutland in Domesday consisted of the wapentakes
of ' Alfnodestou ' and ' Martinsley,' representing the three modern hun-
dreds of Alstoe, Martinsley, and Oakham soke. At the beginning of the
survey of this district these two wapentakes are named with the state-
ment that they belong to the sherifdom of Nottingham with reference
to the king's geld (ad geldum regis), and in particular we are told that
Alstoe is ' half in Thurgarton and half in Broxtow wapentake.' Perhaps
the simplest possible explanation of this very difficult phrase would be
that the proceeds of the Alstoe court were divided between Thurgarton
and Broxtow wapentakes in the sense of being added in equal propor-
tions to the perquisites drawn by the sheriff of Nottingham from each of
the latter. We certainly cannot suppose that half the peasantry of Alstoe
wapentake were expected to travel forty miles each month to attend the
court at Thurgarton. The essence of the connexion doubtless was that
the sheriff of Nottingham was answerable for the Rutland Danegeld, and
it was nearly a century after Domesday before the latter became a fiscally
independent shire. We get a glimpse of this association in another
quarter, for when the Conqueror granted the churches of Uppingham
and Wardley in Rutland to Westminster Abbey he addressed his writ to
Bishop Remigius, Hugh de Port, and 'all his servants and lieges (jidelibus)
of Nottinghamshire.' s
We may now pass on to certain matters which are suggested by the
Nottinghamshire survey as a whole. If the survey is read with special
attention to its statements of manorial values it will be noticed that while
the great majority of values are expressed in simple multiples or fractions
of a pound a considerable number are more complex. Thus the first
four manors entered on the land of the king's thegns are valued respec-
tively at ioj., 5-r. 4</., loj. 8</., and £2. Now this sum of 5^. ^d. with
its fractions and multiples occurs in many entries in Nottinghamshire,
and is found, though somewhat less frequently, in the Derbyshire
Domesday also. The instances of its occurrence in the latter county are
collected in the Victoria History of Derbyshire^ where it is suggested
that these figures are based upon the ' ora,' or ounce of silver, of 1 6 pence,
a currency unit which we know to have prevailed in that district.8 On
1 DomesJay Book and Beyond, 408.
1 Man. i, 301. Remigius is doubtless included as the bishop of the diocese in which these churches
were situated, but it is difficult to explain the fact that Hugh de Port occupies in this charter (1081-
1087) the place of a sheriff of Notts. We have no statement elsewhere to the effect that he ever held
that office, and he held no land in this county in 1 08 6.
* This is proved by the fact that the Burton Chartulary uses 'ora 'and ' 1 6 pence' interchangeably.
See Mr. Round in Eng. Hist. Rev. April, 1905 ; and feudal England.
240
DOMESDAY SURVEY
the other hand, in the survey of Leicester, the capital of another of the
counties of the true Danelaw, as at Oxford, we are distinctly told that
the ora consisted of 20 pence, but in Cambridgeshire and Bedfordshire
we know that the reckoning of 16 pence held good. The denomi-
nation is not mentioned by name in Nottinghamshire, but the following
table certainly suggests that the 16 pence equation was recognized in
this county also : —
£ '• d.
014
028
Value T.R.E. at :
Value T.R.W. at i
054
o 10 8
0160
Clarborough Clarborough
Kinoulton
Xhrumpton Thrumpton
Rempstone
Oxton
Calverton
West Dray ton
Aslockton Aslockton
— Carlton on Trent
Woodborough Woodborough
Trowell
.Chilwell Costock
( Fenton Fenton
' "] Knapthorpe Knapthorpe
( Welham
East Markham East Markham
Gotham Gotham
Greasley Beckingham
Oxton Kelham
Cossall Eakring
Normanton-by-Southwell . . North Muskham
Cropwell Butler
Calverton
South Muskham —
The same unit is very prominent in the valuation of mills, a fact
which Mr. Round has noticed elsewhere. Thus mills at Newark,
Barnby in the Willows, Epperstone, Oxton, Staunton, and Hawton were
valued at 5^. ^d. each, the mill at Tuxford was worth IGJ. 8</., while
those at Laneham, East Markham, Kirklington, Warsop, Hickling, and
Teversall, were estimated at i6j. each, and at Tilne, Clarborough, and
Bole we read of 'two mills rendering £i 12s.' Apart from mills, the
fishery at Dunham had been worth IQJ. 8</., and two of the most impor-
tant ferries across the Trent, at Gunthorpe and Fiskerton, had brought
in £1 i os. %d. and £2 6s. 8d. respectively, the last of course representing
a sum of seven half-marks.1
In the Victoria History of Derbyshire it was pointed out that the
existence of this ' ora ' of 1 6d. threw a little light upon the curious
series of fines by which the king's peace was safeguarded in Nottingham-
shire and Derbyshire. The statement in question, which is repeated
1 For the value of the ' ora ' compare Studies in Anglo-Saxon Institutions, by Mr. H. M. Chadwick,
who, however, regards the Domesday evidence as pointing exclusively to an ' ora ' of 20 pence.
I 241 31
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
with slight verbal differences in the Yorkshire and Lincoln surveys,
runs : —
In Snotingeham scyre et in Derbescyre pax regis manu vel sigillo data, si fuerit
infracta emendatur per xviii hundrez. Unumquodque hund : viii libras.
Now £8 represents 120 'ores,' that is 100 according to the ' Anglicus
Numerus ' which was followed in the Danelaw, and this fact becomes signi-
ficant when we read in a statement of the privileges of the church of
York : ' Si quis enim quemlibet . . . infra atrium ecclesiae caperet
et retineret, universali judicio vi hundreth emendabit. In hundreth
viii librae continentur.'1 In 1106 these privileges were declared to
apply to the church of Southwell,8 so that we are justified in extending
their application into Nottinghamshire, and by combining this passage
with the above quotation from Domesday we see that the ' hundred '
was i oo ' ores,' and that most probably on this account the sum of £8
came itself to be described as a ' hundred.' This is not the place in
which to discuss the meaning of these ' hundreds ' as fiscal groups, which
has been treated by Mr. Round in Feudal England, nor can we enter
into the difficult question of their possible connexion with the territorial
hundreds mentioned here and there in the body of the survey of this county,
but we may note that the Lindsey survey shows us that the Lincolnshire
' hundred ' normally contained 1 2 carucates, which, as .£8 represents
12 marks as well as 120 ores, illustrates in a striking way the neatness
and artificiality of early fiscal arrangements.3
Nottinghamshire was one of those counties in which we may
suspect that the compilers of Domesday did not deal very consistently
with certain classes of society included in the original returns.4 Two
very important classes, slaves at one end of the social order and rent-
paying tenants (here styled ' censores ') at the other, are mentioned just
sufficiently often to prove that nothing in the instructions issued to the
Domesday commissioners directed their exclusion from the returns, but
appear in our portion of the survey in a way which suggests that their
entry depended on the caprice of the scribes. Thus not a single ' censor ' or
serf appears on the first fifteen folios of the Nottinghamshire survey; but at
Colwick, the first manor entered on the fief of William Peverel, we meet
with two serfs, and at Gonalston two ' censores ' occur. On the next folio
two serfs are entered at Stapleford, and four at Bilborough, and two serfs
appear at Bulcote on the succeeding fief of Walter de Aincurt. The
scribes would seem to have been more exact in their description of
Geoffrey Alselin's land which follows, for in addition to the serfs who
are found, in number five, six, and one respectively at Laxton, Stoke with
Gedling, and Burton Joyce, an ' ancilla ' or female serf is entered at the first
1 Feudal England, 73.
* A statement of these privileges is entered in the (MS.) Liber Albus of Southwell.
3 feudal England, 7 5 .
* The unsystematic methods of the scribes in matters of secondary importance for their purposes are
illustrated in another way. In Notts, there occurs only one instance, at Gunthorpe, of the tallage
(tailla) which is a prominent feature of the Lincoln survey, and cannot reasonably be supposed to have
been levied on a single manor only in the former county.
242
DOMESDAY SURVEY
and last of these places ; but serfs, ' ancillae,' and ' censores ' alike are en-
tirely absent from the remainder of the survey. We shall not explain
their casual appearance on geographical grounds, for if Stapleford and
Bilborough are close to the border of Derbyshire, where the servile
population reaches "j per cent., Laxton is within 7 miles of Lincolnshire,
where, so far as the evidence of Domesday goes, there were no serfs at
all. No doubt the proportion of the servile class is usually supposed to
have reached its lowest point in the Danelaw, yet there were nearly 700
serfs in Leicestershire, while as for Nottinghamshire the fact that the
servi are confined to three fiefs entered in the middle of the survey
would alone make any conclusions based on their numbers in this county
extremely precarious. No freemen, strictly so called (liberi homines] , occur
in Nottinghamshire, but we notice seven franci homines, who may be either
franklins or Frenchmen,1 at Newark, and one francus homo is to be found
on William Peverel's portion of Langar. But the Liber de Welbeck gives one
most interesting glimpse of an older order of society in its account of Norton
Cuckney. The story runs that a certain 'Joceus the Fleming' came to
England with the Conqueror, and received land in Cuckney. In the
same vill there was dwelling one Gamelbere, who had held 2 carucates of
land before the Conquest as a ' dreng,' on condition of shoeing the king's
palfrey when he came to Mansfield, and of performing such duties as
belonged to a holding of 2 carucates whenever there was need of military
service in Wales. Gamelbere (the name is pure Danish) died in the
time of Henry I, having presumably continued to hold his land according
to pre-Conquest conditions of tenure up to his death, and the king gave
his 2 carucates to Richard, son of the above-mentioned 'Joceus the
Fleming.'2 It is impossible to corroborate this story from Domesday
evidence, for neither ' Joceus ' nor Gamelbere is mentioned in the
survey ; but there seems no reason to doubt its truth, nor the fact
that in 1086 there was still to be found in Nottinghamshire one
of that class of ' drengs ' who figure prominently in the land between
Ribble and Mersey, and maintained their ancient tenures in the
north for centuries after Domesday, but of whose existence we
can find only the slenderest traces after the Conquest south of the
Humber.3
The Nottinghamshire survey is not a very favourable specimen of
the workmanship of the Domesday scribes. The earls, as we have seen,
are entered before the ecclesiastical tenants, one folio is entirely vacant,
and there are numerous blank spaces in the manuscript, while erasures,
interlineations, and marginal entries are frequent. The account of the
king's manor of Mansfield is somewhat unintelligible at first sight. It
1 Probably the former. See Mr. Round's remarks in P.C.H. Warwickshire, i, 285.
' Mm. Angl., vi, 872
3 The most complete account of drengage is contained in Prof. Maitland's article on Northumbrian
tenures, Eng. Hist. Rev. v, 625 et seq. See also Lapsley in Amer. Hist. Rev. ix, 670-695, and V. C.H.
Durham, i, 284—291. It may be noted that the Worksop Priory documents contain references to
land 'ad Inwara(m) ' and 'ad Utwara(m) ' so late as the reign of Henry II. See Atherueum, 24 June,
1905.
243
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
follows the description of his manor of Grimston, which, though desig-
nated as a * manerium ' by the symbol M in the margin of the entry, and
possessing five pieces of appurtenant sokeland, is described as being a
berewick in Mansfield. Then comes the survey of the latter, which is
followed by a string of place-names with assessment figures annexed, of
which we read that the total amounts to 13 carucates 6J bovates. This
is not true, for these figures work out at the much neater total of 1 5 caru-
cates ; but the survey then goes on to describe some of these places with
their agricultural details, a plan which is followed more consistently in
the account of the soke of Grantham in the Lincolnshire Domesday.
One touch of personal interest occurs in these last details, for at Warsop
we are told that ' there is i bovate which a blind man holds in alms of the
king.' He is entered again on the thegns' land at the very end of the
survey, and as the assessment of Warsop is complete as a 3~carucate vill
without his bovate, it is quite possible that he was exempted from pay-
ment of the geld. Professor Freeman rather unnecessarily suggested that
he had been ' blinded by the king's orders.' l We may also note that
i bovate which the king held in Farnsfield ' prope Snotingeham '
as belonging to Grimston soke is not improbably entered again on
Walter de Aincurt's land as that bovate which was ' the king's, but
belonged to the hundred of Southwell,' to which reference has already
been made.9
The history of the eight Domesday wapentakes of Nottinghamshire is
reasonably clear, the only changes of importance being that Oswardbeck has
been united to Bassetlaw, of which it forms the North Clay division, and
' Lide ' to Thurgarton, the name of the former being preserved in the old
description of the latter as the wapentake of ' Thurgarton-a-Lee.' It is
always worth while to try to trace the order in which the hundreds (or
wapentakes) are entered in the survey, especially where, as in this county,
the rubrication is not consistent, for a sequence once established may throw
light on difficult problems of identification, and also has a bearing on the
question of possible circuits which may have been made by the Domesday
commissioners. In Nottinghamshire, the fief of Roger de Busli, which is
rubricated throughout, shows the following order : Newark, Bassetlaw,
' Lide,' Thurgarton, Rushcliffe, (Broxtow), Bingham, Oswardbeck. The
nine manors of Count Alan's fief, which is not rubricated at all, were
scattered over five wapentakes which are entered in the above order,
which also appears on the fiefs of Walter de Aincurt, Geoffrey Alselin,
and (with the exception of his first manor) William Peverel. It is also
observed on the king's land, for the description of his possessions in
Oswardbeck wapentake immediately after Mansfield is explained by their
connexion with the latter manor ; and on that of Gilbert de Gand the
mistaken rubrication of Newark wapentake at the head of his fief points
to a practice by which the survey of a tenant's lands would normally
begin therewith. It will be evident that this sequence violates all
geographical order, for it leaps at once from Bingham wapentake in the
1 Norman Conquest, iv, 197. * See above, p. 219.
244
DOMESDAY SURVEY
extreme south of the county, to Oswardbeck wapentake in the extreme
north.
There are a few difficult questions of identification in the Nottingham-
shire Domesday, one of which has the rare distinction of being raised in a
mediaeval law suit. In 1285, Henry de Purpunt and Annora his wife,
lords of Sneinton, were impleaded by the men of that vill on the ground
that while Sneinton was ancient demesne of the crown, Henry and
Annora had increased the rents due from tenements there, and had inter-
fered with the legal rights and privileges of their tenants, on whom they
had also imposed an unaccustomed tallage of 100 marks. In reply it was
urged that Sneinton was not ancient demesne, upon which Domesday
Book was ordered to be searched, when ' Notintone ' was found to be
duly entered on the king's land. There the matter seems to have rested
for two years, but in 1287 a jury found that Sneinton was always called
by that name, and that ' Notintone ' was a part of Nottingham on the
side towards Arnold. On this the men of Sneinton were assessed, but in
view of the undoubted fact that their predecessors had enjoyed the
privileges of ancient demesne in the time of King John, and that in
documents of the time the name appears as Snotintone or Snadinton,
we shall not be disposed to attach much weight to the verdict of the
jury of I287.1
One of the few Nottinghamshire names which have quite vanished
from the modern map is the ' Schidrintune ' which is entered on the royal
demesne, and also on the fiefs of Roger de Busli, Gilbert de Gand,
and Geoffrey Alselin. We need, however, have little hesitation in
identifying it with the modern Kirton, near Ollerton, for in the thirteenth
century the latter was divided between the Everingham barony, repre-
senting the fief of Geoffrey Alselin, the earls of Lincoln, descendants
of Gilbert de Gand, and the family of Fitz Alan (fitz Flaald), the founder
of which had been enfeoffed by Henry I on certain of the escheated
lands of Roger de Busli, and has been recognized by Mr. Round as the
ancestor of the Stewarts.* Another name presenting difficulty is
' Cledretone,' which was part of the king's soke of Oswardbeck, and has
also been already described as being divided equally between Count Alan
and Roger de Busli. In all probability it is now represented by South
Leverton, which formed part of Oswardbeck soke, and also, like 'Cledretone'
in Domesday, was held of the honour of Richmond by the Musters
family. It is probable that the ' Suderdeshale ' which occurs in the
king's land, for all the formidable appearance of the name, is in reality a
corruption for ' Sud Ordeshale ' (South Ordsall), with which it agrees in
geographical position
No account of the Nottinghamshire Domesday would be complete
which did not include a passing reference to the history of the county
published in 1677 by Robert Thoroton, a most worthy member of the
1 See the account of this case in Thoroton, Hist, of Notts, iii, 2, and Placita coram rege, Mich.
13-14 Edw. I, m. 28,
* Round, Studies in Peerage and Family History, 129.
245
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
great band of seventeenth-century antiquaries. It is perhaps the
greatest merit of Thoroton's work that he fully grasped the essential fact
that the key to all manorial history lies in the distribution of land recorded
in Domesday, and that he carried out this principle with such thorough-
ness that, so far as the work of identification is concerned, independent
investigation can often do little more than confirm his minuteness and
accuracy. The extent of his knowledge, and the strength with which he
applied it to the narrow but all-important study of manorial descent,
make his book one of the best, as it is one of the earliest, examples of the
systematic treatment of Domesday for purposes of local history.
NOTE
The reader should bear in mind that the date of the Domesday Survey is 1086; and that
'the time of King Edward' normally means the date of his death (5 January, 1066). The
Domesday ' carucate ' was a unit of assessment containing 8 ' bovates.' The essential portion
of the plough was its team of oxen, eight in number. The 'demesne' was the lord's portion
of the manor, the peasantry holding the rest of it under him.
It must always be remembered that when Domesday speaks of a place as held by a certain
tenant it does not follow that the whole of it is thereby meant ; as the vills often comprised
other manors which form the subject of separate entries.
In the survey of this county manors, berewicks, and soc-land are distinguished as a rule
by the letters M., B., S., preceded by a numeral in cases where several pre-Conquest estates
have been united.
Domesday Form
1. Bcrnedesclawe
Bcrnedelawe
Bernesedelawe
Bernesedelaw
2. Brocolvestou
Brolvestou
Brochelestou 1
3. Bingameshou
Bingehamhou
4. Torgartone
Turgastune1
5. Newerca .
Newerce .
6. Riseclive
THE NOTTINGHAMSHIRE WAPF.NTAKES
Modern Form
Bassctlaw
Broxtow
Bin°;ham
Thurgarton
Newark
Rushcliffe
Domesday Form Modern Form
Comprises with the
addition of the villages
7. Wardebec
of Rampton and Tres-
Oswardebec
well the present North
Clay division of Basset-
i, law wapentake.
8. Lide . . . Now the North Di-
vision of Thurgar-
ton wapentake.
Reference is also made to the following
' Hundreds ' :—
1 These forms occur in the Rutland introduc-
tion.
1. Sudwelle = Southwell (trans, p. 274).
2. Bliduorde = Blidworth (trans, p. 281).
3. Pluntre = Plumtree (trans, p. 283).
And in the AIGRUN [Averham] entry,
p. 281, it is said that to this manor belong
five sochmen in other hundreds.
This may suggest a system of small territorial
hundreds such as occurs in the Leicester Survey.
246
Q
(fi
UJ
S
O
O
*=< t/1
s
S
^v
V
i._
1
g
-\
^~) O
1
/
"-x..-
'""
\
X
V
\
!
i >
j
\
S
\ A
\
i
j
i
i
Sr-^
/-
V.-
j
\
i
1
i
W
\
x-'
V
r*
*'
D
E
R
NOTES TO DOMESDAY MAP
(Compiled by F. M. STENTON, B.A.)
4_A_
IN this map those manors in which the king
had an interest have a red line under them ;
those in which the greatest ecclesiastical
tenant, the Archbishop of York held land,
are distinguished by a blue line (broken), and
V
•a
Z
1
^"2
'£
c
S
c
at
U
0
V
-o
,c
c
1
C4
-o
_5
2
"5
c
§
bo
1)
Ifi
3
1)
S
E
0
ID
"S
U
O.
•4-1
O
2;
boundaries of the Wapentakes. The rubri-
c
D
"E.
5
u
|
en
V
5
1
respect throughout the county, and is occa-
sionally inaccurate ; while the great estates
of the Archbishop of York interrupted the
continuity of the northern Wapentakes, and
by preserving their own unity as a ' Liberty '
distinct from the shire organisation, they
render it impossible to reconstruct the
Domesday Wapentakes from later evidence.
3'
-3
to
V
a
Q
1
g
i
0
1
u
•r.
the Wapentakes were so disposed that their
boundaries in every case extended for some
V
-C
a
5
H
a
0
"3
<u
o
c
n
^r
'•5
case of the great north-western district of
o
o
o
h-
O
SNOTINGHAMSCIRE
ioi. 28oa JN j£ING EDWARD'S TIME THERE WERE IN THE BOROUGH OF SNOTINGE-
HAM [Nottingham] 173 burgesses and 19 villeins. To this borough
there belong (adiacenf) 6 carucates of land (assessed) to the king's geld
and i meadow and underwood (sifoce minutes) 6 furlongs in length and 5
in breadth. This land was divided among 38 burgesses and rendered
75 shillings and 7 pence from the rent (censu) of the land and the services1
(operibus) of the burgesses and 40 shillings from 2 moneyers (monetarii}.
In it (Inib'i) earl Tosti(g) had I carucate of land from the soc of which
land (de cujus terre soca) the king used to have the two pennies and the
earl himself the third. Hugh, son of Baldric, the sheriff, found 136
men dwelling (there), now there are 16 less. Nevertheless Hugh himself
built 13 houses, which were not before, on the earl's land in the new
borough, adding them to the rent (apponens eas in censu) of the old
borough.
In Snotingeham there is one church in the king's demesne to which
there belong (in qua iacenf) 3 burgess tenements [mansiones burgi) and 5
bovates of land of the above named 6 carucates with sac and soc (saca et
soca), and to the same church belong 5! acres of land of which the
king has the sac and soc. The burgesses have 6 carucates of arable land
(terre ad arana") and 20 bordars and 14 ploughs (carucas). They were
accustomed to fish in the water of Trent, and now they make complaint
that they are forbidden to fish.
In King Edward's time Snotingham rendered 18 pounds, now it
renders 30 pounds and 10 pounds from the mint.
In Snotingham Roger de Busli has 3 tenements (mansiones) on which
are established 1 1 houses rendering 4 shillings and 7 pence. William
Pev(e)rel has 48 merchants' houses rendering 36 shillings and 12
horsemen's houses (domus equitutri) and 8 bordars. Ralf de Burun has
1 3 horsemen's houses ; in one of these one merchant dwells. Gulbert
(has) 4 houses. Ralf the son of Hubert has 1 1 houses ; in these 3
merchants dwell. Geoffrey Alselin has 21 houses and Aitard the priest
2 houses. In the priest's croft there are 65 houses and in these the king
has sac and soc. The church with all the things that pertain to it is
worth 100 shillings yearly. Richard Frelle has 4 houses. In the
borough ditch (fossatum burgi) there are 17 houses and 6 other houses.
The king granted to William Pev(e)rel 10 acres of land for making an
orchard (pomerium).
In Snotingeham King Edward had i carucate of land with
the geld. (There was) land for 2 ploughs. There the king has now
1 i.e. the value of their labour services in respect of this land.
247
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
1 1 villeins having 4 ploughs and 1 2 acres of meadow. (There is)
nothing1 in demesne. In King Edward's time it was worth 3 pounds,
(and it is worth) the same now.
In Snotingeham the water of Trent and the Foss (Way) and
the road towards York are so guarded that if any one impedes the
passage of boats or if any one ploughs or makes a ditch within two
perches of the king's road he has to pay a fine of (emendare per) 8
pounds.'
fol. a8ob
In Snotingehamscyre and in Derbiscyre if the king's peace, given
under his hand or seal, be broken a fine is paid (emendatur) of (per) 18
hundreds. Each hundred (being) 8 pounds. The king has 2 parts of
this fine (emendationis) , the earl the third. That is, 12 hundreds pay to
the king and 6 to the earl.
If any one be exiled according to law for any crime none but the
king can restore peace to him.
A thegn having more than 6 manors does not give relief of his
land except 8 pounds to the king alone. If he has only 6 or less he
gives 3 marks of silver to the sheriff as relief wherever he dwells, in
the borough or without. If a thegn having sac and soc forfeit his land
the king and earl between them have half his land and money, and
his lawful wife with his legitimate heirs, if there be any, have the
other half.
Here are noted those who had soc and sac and thol and thaim
and the king's dues (consuetudinem) of the two pennies.3
The Archbishop of York over his manors and the Countess Godeva
over Newerca [Newark] Wapentake and Ulf fenisc over his land ; the
Abbot of (Peter) Borough over Colingeham [Collingham] ; the Abbot
of Bertune [Burton]; Earl Hugh (of Chester) over Marcheton [Mar-
keaton, Derby] ; the Bishop of Cestre [Chester] ; Tochi ; Suen the son
of Suave ; Siward barn ; Azor the son of Saleva ; Ulfric cilt ; Elsi ;
Illinge ; Lewin the son of Alwin; the Countess Alveva; the Countess
Goda ; Elsi the son of Caschin over Werchesoppe [Worksop] ; Henry
de Ferrars over Ednodestune [Ednaston, Derby] and Dubrige [Doveridge,
Derby] and Breilesfordham [Brailsford, Derby]; Walter de Aincurt over
Granebi [Granby] and Mortune [Morton, Derby] and Pinnesleig [Pilsley,
Derby]. None of all these could have the earl's third penny except by
his grant, and that for as long as he should live, except the Archbishop
and Ulf fenisc and the Countess Godeva.
Over the soc which belongs to Cliftune [Clifton] the earl ought to
have the third part of all customs and services (operum).
1 i.e. no ploughs.
1 The first column of this page (z8oa) ends here. The second column is devoted to Derby and
is therefore treated in the Victoria History of Derbyshire, i, 327.
* i.e. the two-thirds of certain profits, of which ' the third penny ' went to the earl.
248
HERE ARE ENTERED
THE HOLDERS OF LANDS IN
SNOTINGHAMSCIRE
i KING WILLIAM
ii Count Alan (of Richmond)
in Earl Hugh (of Chester)
mi The Count of Mortain
v The Archbishop of York
vi The Bishop of Lincoln
VH The Bishop of Bayeux
vin The abbey of [Peterborough
ix Roger de Busli
x William Pev(e)rel
xi Walter de Aincurt
xn Geoffrey Alselin
xin Ralf the son of Hubert
xim Ralf de Limesi
xv Ralf de Burun
fol. 281
I. THE KING'S LAND
BERNEDESELAWE [BASSETLAW] WAPENTAC
M. In DUNEHAM [Dunham] with (its) 4
berewicks RAGENEHIL [Ragnall], WIMENTUN
[Wimpton], DERLUVETUN [Darlton], SUANE-
STERNE [Swansterne] King Edward had 5^
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 ploughs. Now the king has
there 2 ploughs in demesne and 50 villeins
and 3 bordars having 10 ploughs and I mill
(rendering) 3 shillings and I fishery (rendering)
10 shillings and 8 pence and 120 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage (silva
pastills) 6 furlongs in length and 4 in breadth.
In King Edward's time it rendered 30 pounds
and 6 sestiers (sextarit) of honey ; now (it ren-
ders) 2O pounds with everything that belongs
to it.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In DRAITONE [East Drayton] (there
are) 2 carucates of land and 3 bovates and
the fifth part of I bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 5 ploughs. There 16
sochmen and 17 villeins have 13 ploughs and
20 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pan-
nage i furlong in length and half (a furlong)
in breadth.
S. In MARCHAM [East Markham] (there
are) 3^ carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 10 ploughs. There 25
sochmen and 15 villeins have 10 ploughs.
There (is a church and a priest and 40 acres
xvi Roger de Poitou
xvii Gilbert de Gand
xvni Gilbert Tison
xix Geoffrey de Wirce
xx Ilbert de Laci
xxi Berenger de Todeni
xxn Hugh the son of Baldric
xxin Hugh de Grentemaisnil
xxini Henry de Fereires
xxv Robert Malet
xxvi Durand Malet
xxvii Osbern the son of Richard
xxvin Robert the son of William
xxix William the usher (hostiarius)
xxx The king's thegns1
of meadow and a little underwood (silva
minutte],
S. In GRENLEIGE [Little Gringley] (there
are) 2 bovates of land and the sixth part of I
bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 2 ploughs. There 5 sochmen and I
bordar have 2 ploughs. Wood(land) for
pannage 4 furlongs in length and 4 in
breadth.
S. In ORDESHALE [Ordsall] (there is) i
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. There 2 sochmen have
I plough and 3 acres of meadow and 3 acres
of wood(land).
S. In HEDUNE [Headon] 2 (there is) half a
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I ox and 2 acres of meadow. It
is waste.
S. In UPETONE [Upton] (there is) i bovate
of land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for I plough. There 4 sochmen and 2 bor-
dars have !•£ ploughs and 3 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 2 furlongs in length
and I in breadth.
S. In NORMENTONE [Normanton by Clum-
ber] (there are) i£ bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. Half of this land belongs to
1 This list is followed immediately by one of
the holders of lands in that portion of Rutland of
which the survey follows that of Nottinghamshire.
This is reserved for the Victoria History of Rutland.
1 Hedune added above ' Grave ' [Grove], under-
lined for deletion.
249
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
DUNE [Dunham], the other (half) to BODMES-
CELD [Bothamsall]. It is waste. (There is)
wood(land) for pannage 3 furlongs in length
and 2 in breadth.
M. In BODMESCEL [Bothamsall] Earl
Tosti(g) had 12 bovatesof land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 8 ploughs. Now
the king has there 5 villeins and i bordar,
with 2 ploughs and I mill (rendering) 8 shil-
lings and 40 acres of meadow. Wood(land)
for pannage half a league in length and 4
furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 8 pounds ; now (it is worth)
60 shillings.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In ELCHESLEIG [Elkesley] (there are) 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There (is) a church
and a priest and 6 sochmen with i£ ploughs,
and I mill (rendering) 4 shillings and a little
underwood (silvte minutis).
S. In MORTUNE [Morton] and another
MORTUNE (there are) 10 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 4
ploughs. There 7 sochmen and I bordar
have 4 ploughs. Wood(land) for pannage 2
furlongs in length and I in breadth.
O o
S. In BABURDE [Babworth] (2^ bovates)
and ODESTORP ' [ ] (4^ bovates) and
ORDESHALE [Ordsall] (i bovate) all together
(there are) "]\ bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. It is
waste except for I villein and 2 bordars with
half a plough. (There are) 10 acres of
meadow.
S. In RANESBI [Ranby] (3 bovates) and
SUDERDESHALE [South Ordsall] (2 bovates)
(there are) 5 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for i^ ploughs. It is
waste.
S. In RANEBI [Ranby] (there are) 2 caru-
cates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 ploughs. It is waste.
S. In MADRESSEIG [Mattersey] (there are)
1 1 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There 12
sochmen and 2 villeins and 3 bordars have 6£
ploughs. Meadow, 3 furlongs in length and
i in breadth. Wood(land) for pannage I
league in length and \\ furlongs in breadth.
S. In LUND [Lound] and BARNEBI [Barnby
Moor] (there are) 6 bovates of land 8 (assessed)
to the geld. There 3 sochmen have I plough
and 3^ acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage 2 furlongs in length and half a fur-
long in breadth.
1 Not identified.
' ' et Jim' et Hi fan un? bou1 ' is added here, but is
underlined for deletion.
M. In GRIMESTUNE [Grimston] * (there
are) 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. (This manor
is a) berewick of (in) MAMMESFED [Mans-
field]. There 3 sochmen and 3 bordars have
2 ploughs and 2 acres of meadow. Wood-
(land) for pannage half a league in length and
4 furlongs in breadth.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In the same place (Ibidem) (there are)
i-^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 oxen. There 2 soch-
men have half a plough.
In SCHIDRINTUNE [Kirton] 4 (there is) half
a bovate (assessed) to the geld.
S. In WILGEBI [Willoughby] and WALESBI
[Walesby] (there are) 2 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for i
plough. There 4 sochmen have I plough.
Wood(land) for pannage 4 perches in length
and 4 in breadth.
S. In BESTORP [Besthorpe] (2 bovates) and
CARLETONE [Carlton on Trent] (2 bovates)
(there are) 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for i plough. There
4 sochmen and 3 bordars have 2 ploughs and
30 acres of wood(land) for pannage.
In FRANESFELD [Farnsfield] the king has
I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld near to
(prope) SNOTINGEHAM.
BROCOLVESTOU [BROXTOW] WAPENTAC
M. In MAMESFELDE [Mansfield] and
SCHEGEBI [Skegby] (B') and SUTONE [Sutton
in Ashfield] (B') King Edward had 3 caru-
cates of land and 6 bovates (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 9 ploughs. There
the king has 2 ploughs in demesne and 5
sochmen on (de) 3 bovates of this land and 35
villeins and 20 bordars with 19^ ploughs, and
i mill and i fishery (rendering) 2 i shillings
and 24 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
* The village of Grimston has long been de-
cayed, but its position can be fixed with certainty
owing to the fact that Jordan Foliot, 36 Henry III.
obtained leave to embattle his manor house of
Grimston. The ' site of Jordan's castle ' is
marked on the Ordnance maps, and the eminence
on which it rests is still known as Grimston Hill.
* This name has no modern equivalent. The
identification with Kirton is based on the substi-
tution of some form of the latter for ' Schidrintune'
in such later lists of holdings as admit of collation
with relative entries in Domesday. Perhaps the
clearest instance of such correspondence occurs in
an inquisition on the death of Henry de Lacy,
Earl of Lincoln, in which the descent of all the
fees mentioned can be traced from the Domesday
estate of Gilbert of Gaunt if ' Kirketon ' replace
' Schidrintune.'
250
HOLDERS OF LANDS
pannage 2 leagues in length and 2 in breadth.
There (are) 2 churches and 2 priests.
In WARSOPE [Warsop] i bovate. In
CLUNE [Clown, Derby] 4 bovates. In CAR-
EER-TONE [Carburton] 2 carucates. In CLUN-
BRE [Clumber] 3 bovates. In BUTEBI [Budby]
2 carucates. In TURESBI [Thoresby] 6
bovates. In SCOTEBI [Scofton] and TORP
[Perlethorpe] and ROWETONE [Rayton] 2
carucates. In EDENESTOU [Edwinstowe] i
carucate. In GRIMESTONE [Grimston] half a
carucate. In ECERINGHE [Eakring] 3^bovates.
In MAPELBEC [Maplebeck] 2 bovates. In
BESTORP [Besthorpe] 2 bovates. In CAREN-
TUNE [Carlton on Trent] 2 bovates. In
SCHITRINTONE [Kirton] i£ bovates. In WIL-
GEBI [Willoughby] i£ bovates. In ALMUN-
TONE [Ompton] x i £ bovates. In CARETONE
[Carlton in Lindrick] 4 carucates.
In all (there are) 13 carucates of land and
6£ bovates (assessed) to the geld.
In WARESOPE [Warsop] (there is) i bovate
of land which a certain blind man (ctscus)
holds of the king in alms (eltmosina), where he
has I bordar with 6 ploughing oxen (bobus in
car')
In TORP [Perlethorpe] (there is) the fourth
part of I bovate of land which belongs (iacef)
to MAMESFELD [Mansfield]. It is waste.
BEREWICK
B. In GRIMESTONE [Grimston] (there are)
4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There the
king has I plough and 8 villeins and I bordar
having 2 ploughs. Wood(land) for pannage
6 furlongs in length and 4 in breadth.
BEREWICK
B. In EDENESTOU [Edwinstowe] (there is)
1 carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There (is) a
church ; and a priest and 4 bordars have I
plough. Wood(land) for pannage half a
league in length and half (a league) in
breadth.
S. In MAPELBERG [Maplebeck] (there are)
2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. There 3 soch-
men have i plough.
S. In CARLETONE [Carlton in Lindrick]
(there are) 2 carucates. In SCOTEBI [Scofton]
and RENETON [Rayton] and TORP [Perle-
thorpe] (there are) 2 carucates ; * this is 4
(carucates assessed) to the geld. The soc
1 ' • I • borf ' added above ' Almuntone.'
J 'In Ranebi ii. car' terrae' is added in the
original but erased, 'de bodmescel' is interlined in
explanation, and the total number of carucates in
the entry is corrected from 6 to 4.
belongs to (de) MAMESFELD [Mansfield]. They
are waste.
Also Soc[land] in Wardebec [Oswardbeck]
Wapentac
S. In TILNE [Tilne] (there are) 2 bovates of
land and the fourth part of I bovate (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for i plough.
There 2 sochmen and i villein and i bordar
have 6 ploughing oxen (haves in car1). There
(are) 2 mills (rendering) 32 shillings and 6 acres
of meadow. It is worth 40 shillings.
fol. aSib
S. In CLEDRETONE [South Leverton] 3 (there
are) 12 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There 22
sochmen and 1 1 villeins have 9 ploughs.
In King Edward's time these sochmen
rendered 10 shillings by way of (de) custom
(consuetudine).
In FENTUNE [Fenton] (there is) half a caru-
cate (of land assessed) to the geld.
S. In LITELBURG [Littleborough] (there
are) 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. There 14
sochmen and 2 villeins and 4 bordars have 5
ploughs. Meadow, 3 furlongs and 10 rods
in length and 2 furlongs in breadth. This
soc (soca) is worth 10 shillings.
S. In ESTRETONE [Sturton le Steeple] (there
are) 2 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 ploughs. There 24
sochmen and 1 1 villeins and 7 bordars have
8 ploughs. Meadow, i league in length and
I furlong in breadth. Wood(Iand) for pan-
nage I league in length and 5 furlongs in
breadth. This soc is worth 40 shillings.
S. In WATELEIE [Wheatley] (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There 6 sochmen and
I villein have 2 ploughs. Wood(land) for
3 The name ' Cledretone ' is not found after
Domesday. But South Leverton formed part of
'Oswardbeck Soke' and the patronage of its church
remained with the Dean and Chapter of Lincoln
until 1884 probably as a result of Rufus's gift to
that body of the churches belonging to his manor
of Mansfield. Further on (p. 254). 'Cledretone'
appears to be dependent on Treswell, the adjoining
village to South Leverton. Both villages were
divided equally between Roger de Busli and Count
Alan of Richmond ; and the descendants of Robert
de Mosters, tenant of the latter half of Treswell,
are seen from the Testa de Nevil and earlier records
to have held land in Leverton.
North Leverton ('Legretone' below) seems to
have lain in the archbishop's soke of Laneham, not
in the king's soke of Oswardbeck, and it formed
a prebend in Southwell Minster.
251
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
pannage I league and i furlong in length and
i£ furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 3 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 7 (shillings).
S. In WACHERINGHAM [Walkeringham]
(there are) 12^ bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs. There
1 3 sochmen and 2 villeins and 3 bordars have
4 ploughs. Meadow 6 furlongs in length
and 4 in breadth. Wood(land) 8 furlongs in
length and 4 in breadth. It is worth 2O
shillings.
S. In MINISTRETONE [Misterton] (there are)
5 bovates of land and the fourth part of I
bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for i plough. There 5 sochmen and 6 vil-
leins and i bordar have I plough. Meadow,
I furlong in length and half a furlong in
breadth. It is worth 7 shillings.
S. In WISETONE [Wisetqn] (there is) I
carucate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There 7 sochmen
and 7 villeins and 4 bordars have 6 ploughs.
Meadow, 2 furlongs in length and 2 in
breadth. Wood(land) for pannage 14 fur-
longs in length and 4 in breadth. It is worth
10 shillings.
S. In CLAUORDE [Clayworth] (there is) I
carucate of land and 6 bovates (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs.
There 12 sochmen and i villein and 1 8
bordars have 10 ploughs. Meadow 2 fur-
longs in length and i£ in breadth. Wood-
(land) for pannage 10 furlongs in length and
6 in breadth. It is worth 26 shillings and 4
pence.
S. In CLAUREBURG [Clarborough] and TILLE
[Tilne] 1 (there are) 2 bovates of land and
the fourth part of i bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for i plough. There
(are) 2 sochmen and i villein and i bordar
having 6 ploughing oxen (boves in car ') and 2
mills (rendering) 32 shillings and 6 acres of
meadow. It is worth 40 shillings.
S. In WELLUN [Welham] and SIMENTONE
] (there are) 5 bovates of land and
the third part of i bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. There
5 sochmen and i villein and i bordar have 2
ploughs. Meadow, i± furlongs in length and
I furlong and 10 perches in breadth. Wood-
(land) for pannage 9 furlongs in length and
2£ in breadth. It is worth 10 shillings and
8 pence.
S. In GRENELEIG [Gringley on the Hill]
(there are) a£ bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for i plough. There
6 sochmen and i villein and i bordar have
2 ploughs. Wood(land) for pannage 6 furlongs
in length and 4 in breadth. It is worth 10
shillings.
In SANDEBI [Saundby] i villein holds i
orchard (ortum) ; rendering salt for the king's
fish in BIGREDIC [Bycar Dyke].
M. In ERNEHALE [Arnold] King Edward
had 3 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There the king
has I plough and 20 villeins and 4 bordars
having 7 ploughs. Wood(land) for pannage,
scattered (per /oca), 3 leagues in length and 3
in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 4 pounds and 2 sestiers (sextarii) of
honey ; now (it is worth) 8 pounds and 6
sestiers of honey.
The Soc of this Manor
In BRONCOTE [Bramcote] (there are) 5
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 6 oxen.
B. In WALETONE [Wollaton] (there is) i
carucate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. BER[EWICK], It is
. waste.
S. In LENTONE [Lenton] (there are) 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. The
soc belongs to (in) ERNEHALE [Arnold]. It is
waste.
S. In BRUCHELESTOU [Broxtow] (there is)
I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. It is
waste. The soc belongs to (in) ERNEHALE.
In BILEBURCH [Bilborough] (there is) i
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld.
BlNGAMESHOU [BlNGHAM] WAPENT[AC]
M. In OSCHINTONE [Orston] King Edward
had 3 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 10 ploughs. There the
king has 3 ploughs and 3 sochmen on (de) i
carucate of this land and 1 9 villeins and 1 1 bor-
dars having 14 ploughs. There (is) a church
and 2 priests having i plough and i ox, and
1 80 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 30 pounds by tale (ad
numerum) ; now (it is worth) 2O pounds.
Berewick of this Manor
B. In SCARINTONE [Scarrington] (there are)
2 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There the
king has 2 ploughs and 23 villeins and 4 bor-
dars having 5^ ploughs.
In STANTON [Staunton] (there are) 7 bovates
and 3 acres of land (assessed) to the geld.2
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There (are)
i o sochmen and 3 bordars with 3 ploughs and
60 acres of meadow.
1 ' et Tille ' added above Claureburg.
252
1 The rest of this entry is in the margin.
HOLDERS OF LANDS
S. In TORVERTUNE [Thoroton] (there are)
12 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There (is) I
sochman and 1 8 villeins and i bordar1 having
7 ploughs. There (is) a priest.
S. In SCREVINTONE [Screveton] (there is)
i carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There 3 soch-
men and 2 villeins and I bordar have i^
ploughs and 8 acres of meadow.
S. In COLESTONE [Car Colston] (there are)
4 bovates and 4 acres of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for I plough. There
5 sochmen have i£ ploughs.
S. In ASLACHETONE [Aslockton] (there is) I
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld ; I villein
ploughs there.
M. In NEUBOLD [Newbold] * Earl Morcar
had 3 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 8 ploughs. There the
king has 3 ploughs and 13 sochmen and 13
villeins and 3 bordars having 7 ploughs and 2
acres of underwood (silva minuta). There (is)
a priest and a church. In King Edward's
time it was worth 4 pounds ; now (it is '
worth) 10 pounds.
M. In BROTONE [Upper Broughton] Earl
Algar had 2 carucates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 7 ploughs.
There the king has 2 ploughs and 23 villeins
and 4 bordars having 7 ploughs and I mill
(rendering) 5 shillings, and 100 acres of mea-
dow. In King Edward's time it was worth
3 pounds ; now (it is worth) 4 (pounds).
Berewick
B. In TORP [Thorpe-in-the-Glebe] (there
are) I o bovates of land (assessed ) to the geld.
(There is) land for 10 oxen. It is waste.
There (are) 12 acres of meadow. It is worth
2 shillings. In King Edward's time (it was
worth) 40 shillings.
M. In FLINTHAM [Flintham] Elwin had
14 bovates of land and three parts of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 5
ploughs. There the king has 2 ploughs in
demesne ; and 5 sochmen and 4 villeins and 5
bordars having 3 ploughs. There (is) a
church and a priest having half a plough and
60 acres of meadow. Underwood (silva minuta)
3^ furlongs in length and i furlong in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 60
shillings, now (it is worth) 40 (shillings).
In CHENIVETON [Kneeton] (there are) 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 oxen. There I sochman has
half a plough and i acre of meadow.
In NOTINTONE 3 [Sneinton] the king has i
carucate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There n villeins
have 4 ploughs and 12 acres of meadow. It
is worth 3 pounds.
In MERINGE [Meering] William had 6£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
In MISNE [Misson] the king has 3 bovates
(assessed) to the geld. Tostig had (it). There
are 6 villeins with 3 ploughs. The soc be-
longs to (in) CIRCETON [Kirton-in-Lindsey].
In the same place (Ibidem, sc. MISNE) (there
is) half a bovate (assessed) to the geld. It
belongs (iacet) to LESTON [Laughton, near
Gainsborough, Lincoln]. There (is) i vil-
lein. Guy (Wido) holds (it) and Alvred
of him.
1 ' et I bord.' interlined.
1 In Kinoulton parish.
fol. J8ab
II. THE LAND OF COUNT ALAN
M. In SIBETORP [Sibthorpe] Unspac had
2 ^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. Count Alan has (it).
Fredgis holds (it) of him, and has there I plough
and 4 sochmen on (de) I bovate of land and 2
bordars having I plough. There (is) a priest and
a church, to which the fourth part of the land
belongs. There (are) 10 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time (it was worth) 2O shil-
lings ; now (it is worth) 12 shillings.
M. In the same place [Ibidem] Osbern
had I bovate of land and 3 acres (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for half a plough.
There (is) a priest and 2 bordars and 4 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 10 shillings ; now (it is worth) 4 shil-
lings.
(*)M4. In SIRESTUNE [Syerston] Ailric had
3 bovates (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for i£ ploughs ; (and) there 3 sochmen have
them. There (are) 12 acres of meadow. Robert
holds (it) of Count Alan. Formerly (it was
worth) 40 shillings ; now (it is worth) 20 shil-
lings.
M. In SUDTONE [Sutton upon Trent] Wil-
liam the son of Scelward had 2 carucates of
land and 6 bovates (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 5 ploughs. There Hervey (Herveus),
Count Alan's man, has 2 ploughs and 1 3 soch-
men on (de) the half of this land, and 17 villeins
' See above p. 245.
4 The three entries marked (*) follow each
other in the margin.
253
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
and 3 bordars having 8 ploughs. There (is) a
priest and a church and 3 fisheries and 100 acres
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage, I league
in length and half a league in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 4 pounds and (it
is worth the same) now.
(*)In CARLETUNE [Carlton on Trent]
(there is) I bovate (assessed) to the geld. There
are 3 villeins with I plough. William holds (it).
M. In RODINTUN [Ruddington] Leviet had
12 bovatesof land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 ploughs. There Count A(lan)
has in demesne I plough and (there are) 6 soch-
men and 7 villeins having 3 ploughs. There
(arc) 55 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 60 shillings ; now(it is worth)
30 shillings.
M. In CHENIVETONE [Kneeton] Elsi had i
carucate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 oxen. There Count A(Ian) has
1 plough and 3 sochmen and 5 villeins having
2 ploughs. There (is) a priest and half a church
and I mill (rendering) 10 shillings and 5 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 2O shillings; now (it is worth) 40 (shil-
lings).
M. In the same place [Ibidcni] Ulvric had
i carucate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 oxen. There is I villein and
i bordar.
M. In TIRESWELLE [Treswell] Ulmar had
6 bovates of land and the third part of i bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 4
ploughs. Robert de Mosters, Count A(lan's)
man, has I plough and 8 villeins and 5 bordars
having 4 ploughs and 40 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 4 furlongs in length
and i£ furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings, and (it is
worth the same) now.
(*)In CLEDRETONE [South Leverton]
Godric and Ulmar had 7 bovates of land and the
fifth part of I bovate (assessed) to the geld.
Count Alan and Roger de Busli have held
this land up to the present. (There is) land
for 2 ploughs. It is worth 20 shillings.
III. THE LAND OF EARL HUGH
M. In SUDTONE [Button] Harold had i£
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. Earl Hugh has (it) now.
Robert1 holds (it) of him and has there i£
i <
'flius Wtllehn? erased.
ploughs and 3 sochmen and 6 villeins having
3^ ploughs and I mill (rendering) 20 shillings
and 1 5 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings, and (it is worth
the same) now.
Soc[land]
S. In NORMANTON [Normanton upon Soar]
(there are) 2 bovates of land and 2 parts of i
bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for i plough. It is waste. There (are) 3 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 5 shillings ; now (it is worth) 3 shillings.
M. In BONNITONE [Bonington s] Harold
had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There Robert,
the earl's man, has 3 sochmen and 5 villeins
having i\ ploughs. There (are) 10 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was worth
2O shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
2 M.3 In CHINESTAN [Kingston]. Lewin
and Richard had 3^ bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for i o oxen. There
i sochman has now half a plough and 9 acres
of meadow under (sub) Earl Hugh. In King
Edward's time it was worth 30 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 10 shillings.
IIII. THE LAND OF THE COUNT
OF MORTAIN
M. In NORMANTUNE [Normanton upon
Soar] Stori had i o bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. Now
the Count of Mortain has (it), Alden holds
(it) of (de) him, and has there i plough and 2
sochmen and 2 villeins and 3 bordars having 2
ploughs. There (are) 1 5 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 30 (shillings).
M. In SUDTONE [Sutton Bonington] 4 Stori
had half a carucate of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 12 oxen. (There is)
now i plough in demesne and 5 acres of mea-
dow. In King Edward's time it was worth 30
shillings ; now (it is worth) 2O shillings.
M. In GATHAM [Gotham] Stori had 2 caru-
cates of land and 3^ bovates (assessed) to the
geld and 5 acres. (There is) land for 6 ploughs.
There Count R(obert) has 3 ploughs in
demesne, and 3 sochmen and 20 villeins
* Bonington is the parish of St. Michael's,
Sutton Bonington, while Sutton is the parish of
St. Anne's, Sutton Bonington.
* (£) ; showing the union of two pre-Conquest
manors.
4 i.e. St. Anne's parish. See note above under
Bonington.
254
HOLDERS OF LANDS
and 2 bordars having 9 ploughs and 80
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time it
was worth 60 shillings ; now (it is worth) 40
shillings.
The Soc of this Manor
In LECHE [Leake] (there are) 2 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. There is nothing
there.
M. In STANTUN [Stanton on the Wolds]
Stori had 3^ bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for i plough. There
Alvred, the count's man, has i plough and 6
villeins and 3 bordars with 2 ploughs. There
(are) 20 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 20 (shillings).
M.1 In the same STANTUN Frane had i
bovate of land and 3 parts of I bovate (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for half a plough.
There 3 villeins have now i plough.
M. In CAWORDE [Keyworth] Stori had 3
bovates of land and the third part of i bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for I
plough. There Alvred, the count's man, has
2 sochmen and I villein and I bordar with i£
ploughs. In King Edward's time it was worth
20 shillings; now (it is worth) 10 (shillings).
In NEUTORP [Newthorpe] ^Eluin had i
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 oxen. There (is) wood(land) for
pannage 8 furlongs in length and 2^ (furlongs)
in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 2 shillings ; now (it is worth) 1 2 pence.
fol. 983
V. THE ARCHBISHOP OF YORK'S
LAND
TORGARTONE [THURGARTON] WAPENTAC
M. In SUDWEIXE [Southwell] with its bere-
wicks (Berewitts) there are 22^ carucates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for
24 ploughs. There Archbishop Thomas has
10 ploughs in demesne and 10 sochmen and
75 villeins and 23 bordars having 37 ploughs.
There (are) 2 mills (rendering) 40 shillings and
a fish pond (piscina) and ferry (passagium)
(rendering) 6 shillings.
Of this land 6 knights (milites) hold 4^
carucates. 3 clerks (clerici) have l£ carucates ;
2 bovates of it are in a prebend (prebenda). 2
Englishmen (anglict) have 3 carucates of land
and 5 bovates.
The knights have 7 ploughs in demesne
and 35 villeins and 28 bordars having 21
ploughs and i mill (rendering) 8 shillings.
The clerks have i£ ploughs in demesne and
7 villeins and 5 bordars having 3 ploughs.
The Englishmen have 4 ploughs in de-
mesne and 20 villeins and 6 bordars having
6^ ploughs.
To SUDWELLE belong 188 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 8 leagues in length
and 2^ furlongs in breadth. Arable land (terra
arabilii) 5 leagues in length and 3 in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 40 pounds ;
now (it is worth) 40 pounds and 15 shillings.
In SUDWELLE there are reckoned (numerantur)
12 berewicks.
In NORDMUSCHAM [North Muskham] (there
are) i£ carucates (assessed) to the geld.
BlNGEHAMHOU [BlNGHAM] WAPENTAC
M. & B. In CROPHILLE [Cropwell Bishop]
and HEGELINGE (B') [Hickling] SAINT MARY
OF SUDWELLE [Southwell] had" 2^ carucates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 7 ploughs. The canons have 2 ploughs
there in demesne; and 5 sochmen and 15 vil-
leins and 4 bordars having 6 ploughs and 2
oxen and 20 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 60 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 50 (shillings).
M. & B. In LANUN [Laneham] with these
berewicks, ASCAM [Askham], BECHINGHAM
[Beckingham], SANDEBI [Saundby], BOLUN
[Bole], BURTONE [West Burton], WATELAIE
[South Wheatley], LEGRETONE [North Lever-
ton] , (there are) 9 carucates of land and 2 bovates
(assessed) to the geld. There is land for 27
ploughs. In the demesne of the hall (dominium
aulee) there are 10 bovates of this land. The
remainder is soc(land). Now Archbishop
Thomas has there 4^ ploughs and 35 villeins
and 6 bordars having 16 ploughs. There (is)
a church and a priest and 2 fisheries (render-
ing) 8 shillings and I mill (rendering) 16 shil-
lings. Wood(land) for pannage 3 leagues in
length and 1^ leagues in breadth. (There are)
100 acres of meadow.
In the berewicks mentioned above as belong-
ing to this manor there are 38 sochmen and 17
villeins and 2O bordars having 14^ ploughs.
There are also 33 other sochmen and 6 vil-
leins and 1 8 bordars having 15 ploughs. 2
knights (milites) hold these with their land of
the archbishop.
1 In the text this paragraph follows Caworde, M. In MUSCHAM [Muskham] and CARLE-
but its proper place is indicated by marks in the TON [Carlton on Trent] (there are) 4 carucates
margin. of land and 5 bovates (assessed) to the geld.
255
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
(There is) land for 9^ ploughs. Archbishop
Thomas has there 2 ploughs in demesne and
2O sochmen and 7 villeins and 16 bordars
having 6 ploughs. There (is) a mill (render-
ing) 2 shillings and 66 acres of meadow and
80 acres of underwood (sihts minutts). In King
Edward's time it was worth 1 6 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 10 (shillings).
In ROLLESTONE [Rolleston] Alvric had for
a manor (pro mancrio) \\ bovates (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for i plough which
5 villeins have there. There (are) 12 acres of
meadow. (It was) formerly (worth) 2O shil-
lings ; now it is worth 10 shillings.
M. & B. In SUDTONE [Sutton] and SCROBI
(B') [Scrooby] and LUND (B1) [Lound l] (there
is) i carucate of land and 6 bovates (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 6 ploughs.
Archbishop Thomas has there 2 ploughs in
demesne ; and 14 villeins and 6 bordars having
6 ploughs. There (are) 7 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage half a league and 8
furlongs in length and 8£ furlongs in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 8 pounds,
(and it is worth) the same now.
The Soc of this Manor
In ETTONE [Eaton] 2 carucates (assessed)
to the geld. In TILNE [Tilne] 2 bovates
and the fourth part of i bovate. In WELLON
[Welham] and SIMENTON [ ] 5 bo-
vates and the fourth part of I bovate. In
GRENELEI [Little Gringley] i bovate and the
fourth part of i bovate. In SCAFTEORDE
[Scaftworth] i carucate. In EVRETONE
[Everton] I carucate and the third part of I
bovate. This land is (sufficient) for 12
ploughs. There 38 sochmen with 18 villeins
and 20 bordars now have 25 ploughs. In
TILNE [Tilne] i mill rendering 30 shillings
belonging to LANUM [Laneham].3 In RED-
FORDE [Retford] i mill belonging to SUDTONE
[Sutton]. In CLAUEBURCH [Clarborough] 6£
bovates. Meadow 4^ furlongs in length and
the same in breadth and 45 acres in addition.
Wood(Iand) for pannage 2^ leagues in length
and 2 leagues in breadth.
M. In BLIDEWORDE [Blidworth] the Arch-
bishop of York had 9 bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs.
Archbishop Thomas has there 5 villeins having
2 ploughs and i mill which is in LUDEHAM
[Lowdham]. Wood(land) for pannage 3 leagues
in length and i in breadth.
1 ' Madressei ' in original is underlined for dele-
tion, and ' Lund ' is written over it.
1 ' pertinens ad Lann ' interlined.
BER[EWICK]
B. In CALVRETONE [Calverton] (there are)
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 oxen. There 7 villeins and 2
bordars have 2 ploughs. There (is) a church
and a priest and 2 acres of meadow. Wood-
(land) for pannage 8 furlongs in length and 3
(furlongs) in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 40 shillings and (it is worth the
same) now.
M. In OSTONE [Oxton] Elnod had 6 bo-
vates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for 2 ploughs. There Archbishop Thomas
has i plough in demesne and i sochman and
I villein and i bordar having 2 ploughs. The
king has I bovate of this land. The remainder
belongs (iactt) to BLIDEWORDE [Blidworth]. In
King Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 20 (shillings).
In RAVESCHEL [Ranskill] (there are) 4^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. There
is land for I plough. It was and is waste.
Godric held (it). The archbishop holds (it).
M. In NORTWELLE [Norwell] SAINT MARY
of SUDWELLE [Southwell] had 12 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for
6 ploughs. There (are) now 2 ploughs in de-
mesne and 22 villeins and 3 bordars having 7
ploughs. There (is) a church and a priest and
1 mill (rendering) 12 pence, and i fishery and
73 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
2 leagues in length and i in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 6 pounds ; now (it
is worth) 100 shillings.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In OswiTORp3 [Osmondthorpe] (there are)
4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There 4 sochmen have
2 ploughs. (There are) 8 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 4 furlongs in length
and 3 in breadth.
S. In WILGEBI [Willoughby] (there are) 3^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. There 4 sochmen and
3 villeins have 2 ploughs and 16 acres of
meadow.
S. In CALNESTONE [Caunton] (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 oxen. There i sochman and 5
bordars have i^ ploughs and 2 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 3 furlongs in length
and 2 in breadth.
In OCRETONE [Hockerton] (there is) I bovate
of land (assessed) to the geld. There (is) i vil-
lein and i bordar and I acre of meadow.
3 The scribe evidently read ' Osmutorp ' as
' Osunitorp.'
256
HOLDERS OF LANDS
In UDEBURG [Woodborough] (there are) 7
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There (is) half a plough
in demesne, and 2 villeins and I bordar have
i plough. It belongs to SUDWELLE [South-
well].
IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) I clerk (clericus)
has i bovate of land (assessed) to the geld under
(sub) the archbishop.
fol. 28jb.
VI. THE LAND OF THE BISHOP
OF LINCOLN
M. In NEWERCHE [Newark] with (its) two
berewicksBALDRETUNE[Balderton] and FAREN-
DUNE [Farndon] Godeva the countess had 7
carucates of land and 2 bovates (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 26 ploughs. There
Bishop Remi has 7 ploughs in demesne and
56 burgesses (burgensei) and 42 villeins and 4
bordars having 2d£ ploughs. There (are) 10
churches and 8 priests having 5 ploughs. There
7 free men (franci homines) have 5^ ploughs.
There (is) I mill (rendering) 5 shillings and 4
pence and i fishery. To NEWERCHE belong
(adlacenf) all the customs (consuetudines) of the
king and the earl from (de) that wapentake. In
King Edward's time it rendered (reddebat) 50
pounds ; now (it renders) 34 pounds.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In BALDRETONE [Balderton] (there are)
6^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. There 26 sochmen and
3 bordars have 9 ploughs.
S. In CHELVINTONE [Kilvington] (i bovate),
SIRESTUNE [Syerston] (i^ bovates), ELVESTUNE
[Elston] (i bovate), STOCHES [East Stoke] (i^
bovates), HOLTONE [Hawton] (2^ bovates),
CoTiNTONE[Coddington](i carucate),BARNEBi
[Barnby-in-the-Willows] (2^ bovates of land),
WIMUNTORP [Winthorpe] (6£ bovates), to-
gether there are 3 carucates and half a bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for io£
ploughs.
There 77 sochmen with 4 bordars have 15^
ploughs. In these (members) (there are) 163
acres of meadow.
S . In SCORNELEI [South Scarle] ( 2 1 carucates),
GRETONE [Girton] (i| carucates), SPALDES-
FORDE [Spalford] (3^ bovates), TORNESHAIE
[Thorney] (i carucate) and WIGESLEIE [Wigs-
ley] (7 bovates), HERDREBI [Harby] (i bovate),
COTUN [Gotham] (i bovate), together (there
are) 6£ carucates and half a bovate (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 21 ploughs
and 3 oxen. There 71 sochmen and 7 bor-
dars have 21^ ploughs. There (are) 280 acres
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 5 fur-
longs in length and 4 furlongs in breadth.
2 M. In ELVESTUN [Elston] Lewin and Pile-
win had 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. There I villein
and 3 bordars have i plough. There (are) 1 2
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time
it was worth 10 shillings and (it is worth the
same) now. Ravenesort and Arnegrim hold
(it) of the bishop.
M. In COTINTONE [Coddington] Ulvric had
I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 oxen. The bishop has
there half a plough and I acre of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 40
shillings ; now (it is worth) 20 shillings.
M. In the same place Bugo had i£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. There
is land for half a plough. It is waste. Botild
holds (it) and it is worth 2 shillings. There
(are) 2 acres of meadow.
M. In CLITONE [Clifton] Ulviet had 6£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. There
is land for 3 ploughs. Bishop R(emi) has there
3 sochmen on (de) 3 bovates of this land and
I bordar with I plough. There (are) 30 acres
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage half
a league in length and 3 furlongs in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 20
shillings; now (it is worth) IO shillings.
Ralph holds (it).
M. In HERDEBI [Harby] Godwin had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There 5 villeins have
now 2 ploughs and 12 acres of meadow.
Woodland for pannage half a league in length
and half (a league) in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 2O (shillings).
M. In CLIFTONE [Clifton] Frane had 3^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 oxen. Bishop Re(mi) has
there I plough and 6 villeins and 2 bordars
having i\ ploughs. There are 14 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings ; now it is worth 20
shillings. Siwate holds (it).
fol. 984.
M. In the same place Ulviet had i£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. It is waste. Ralf
holds (it). There is the fourth part of I
church and 8 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth IO shillings ; now
(it is worth) 5 shillings.
257
33
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
M. In the same place Agemund had 2^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. The
same Agemund holds (it) of the bishop and has
2 ploughing oxen (boves in car ') and 2 villeins
likewise (with) 2 ploughing oxen and 8 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it
was worth 10 shillings; now (it is worth)
6 shillings.
IN BERNEDELAWE [BASSETLAW] WAPENTAC
M. In FLADEBURG [Fledborough] the
Countess Godeva had I carucate and 3^
bovates (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 4 ploughs. There Nigel, the bishop's
man, has i\ ploughs and 1 6 villeins and 5
sochmen on (de) I bovate of this land having
5 ploughs. There (is) a priest and a church
and I mill (rendering) 12 pence. Wood-
(land) for pannage I league in length and half
a league in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 8 pounds ; now (it is worth) 5
(pounds).
Soc[land]
S. In NORMENTONE [Normanton upon
Trent] (there are) 6 bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 12 oxen.
There 1 1 sochmen have 3 ploughs and 6
acres of meadow.
M. In ESTOCHES [East Stoke] the Countess
Godeva had 6 bovates of land and a third part
and a fifteenth (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 oxen. There Nigel the
bishop's man has 5 sochmen and 4 bordars
having 3 ploughs and 6 acres of meadow
and underwood (si hie minute). In King
Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 10 shillings.
VI. THE LAND OF THE BISHOP
OF BAYEUX
M. In COTES [Gotham] Levric had 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 oxen. There Wazelin the
man of the bishop of Bayeux has I plough
and 5 villeins and I bordar having half a
plough and 20 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 30 (shillings).
M. In BARNEBI [Barnby in the Willows]
Ulvric had 7 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. There
Losuard the man of the bishop of Bayeux has
I plough and 4 sochmen on (de) 2 bovates of this
land and 9 villeins and 6 bordars having 4^
ploughs. There is a priest and a church to
which there belongs (in qua jacet) half a bovate
of this land and i mill (rendering) 5 shillings
and 4 pence and 30 acres of meadow, and
underwood (siha minuta). In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings ; and (it is
worth the same) now.
M. In COTINTON [Coddington] Ulvric had
3^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 1 2 oxen. There Losoard
the bishop's man has 2 villeins and 4 bordars
with i plough and 3 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 10 (shillings).
M. In COTINTONE [Coddington] Levric
had 5 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There
Oudchel has under (sub) the bishop half a
plough and 4 sochmen on (de) 4 bovates of this
land and 3 bordars with half a plough and 5
acres of meadow.
M. In ROLLESTONE [Rolleston] Godwin had
2^ carucates of land (assessed) to the geld and
the fourth part of i bovate. (There is) land for
6 ploughs. There Losoard the bishop's man
has I plough and 1 1 villeins and 9 bordars
having 4^ ploughs. There (is) i mill (render-
ing) 27 shillings and 68 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 8
pounds; now (it is worth) 4 pounds and 10
shillings. To this manor there belong 7
sochmen in OPETONE [Upton] and COLINGE-
HAM [Collingham].
M. In SCREVETONE [Screveton] Toti had 12
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. There Hugh, kinsman
(nepos) of Herbert, the bishop's man, has 5
sochmen and 4 villeins and I bordar having 3
ploughs and 6 oxen and 12 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 20
shillings ; now (it is worth) 32 shillings.
VII. THE LAND OF ST. PETER OF
BURG [PETERBOROUGH]
M. In COLINGEHAM [Collingham] St.
Peter of Burg had 4 carucates of land and half
a bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for 14 ploughs. In demesne there are
now 2 ploughs and (there are) 37 sochmen on
(de) 2 carucates and 3 bovates of this land and
8 villeins and 20 bordars having 14 ploughs.
There (is) a priest and 2 churches and 2 mills
(rendering) 20 shillings and 200 acres of
meadow. Underwood (siha minuta) 2 fur-
longs in length and i in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 9 pounds (and it
is worth) the same now.
M. In NORD MUSCHAM [North Muskham]
St. Peter of Burg had 10 bovates of land
258
HOLDERS OF LANDS
(assessed) to the geld. There is land for 4
ploughs. In demesne there is now I plough
and (there are) 2 sochmen on (de) 2^ bovates of
land and 5 villeins and 3 bordars having i^
ploughs and 2 mills (rendering) 20 shillings
and i waste, and half a fishery and 30 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 60 shillings ; now it is worth 40
shillings.
fol. 284b.
VIII. THE LAND OF ROGER DE
BUSLI
NEWERCA [NEWARK] WAPENTAC
M. In ELVESTUNE [Elston] Oudenecar had
2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for half a plough. There
Norman the priest has of Roger de Busli 5
villeins having 5 ploughing oxen (boves in car').
In King Edward's time it was worth 10 shil-
lings and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In SCELTONE [Shelton] and FLODBERGE
[Flawborough] ^Elsi (had) 7^ bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 2^
ploughs. There Robert, Roger's man, has i
plough, and 6 villeins and 2 bordars have 2
ploughs. There is a church and the site of
i mill and 30 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 30 (shillings).
M. In CLISTONE [Clifton] Oudgrim had
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Roger,
Roger's man, has I plough and I sochman on
(de) I bovate of this land and 7 villeins with 3
ploughs and the fourth part of a church and
30 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pan-
nage (silva pasti/is) 2 furlongs in length and
half (a furlong) in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 30 (shillings).
Soc[land]
S. In SPALDESFORDE [Spalford] (there
are) 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There 2 soch-
men have half a plough and 12 acres of
meadow.
M. In BRODEHOLM [Broadholme]1 Alwi
had 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 12 oxen. There (are) 4
sochmen on (de) 2 bovates of this land and 3
villeins having 4 ploughs and 12 acres of
meadow. Roger de Busli holds (it). In
King Edward's time it was worth 40
shillings ; now (it is worth) 30 (shillings).
i <
Vel Cliftune ' added over ' Brodeholm.'
BERNESEDLAWE [BASSETLAW] WAPENTAC
M. In MARCH AM [East Markham] Edwi
had 9 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There Geoffrey,
Roger's man, has i plough ; and 9 villeins and
5 bordars have 3 ploughs. There is a church
and i mill (rendering) 1 6 shillings. In King
Edward's time (it was worth) 3 pounds ; now
(it is worth) 4 pounds.
M. In the same place Frane had 3!
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There Turold, Roger's
man, has I plough and I villein with 2 plough-
ing oxen (bolus in car'). In King Edward's
time it was worth 20 shillings and (it is
worth) the same now.
2 M. In the same place Godwin and Ulchel
had 7^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3^ ploughs. There Ulchel
and 4 sochmen and 2 bordars have i^ ploughs.
In King Edward's time it was worth 1 6
shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
2 In HEDUNE [Headon] (there is) i bovate of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 2 oxen. The soc belongs to (in) Mark-
ham and (there are) 2 acres of meadow.
There i sochman has 2 oxen.
*In UPETUN [Upton] (there are) 2^ bovates
of land (assessed) to the geld. There is land
for 2 ploughs. The soc belongs to (in)
Markham. There 9 sochmen and 2 bordars
have 4 ploughs and 6 acres of meadow.
2 In GAMELESTUNE [Gamston] (there is) i
orchard (ortum) and i sochman belonging to
MARCHAM and i orchard belonging to
ETONE [Eaton].
2 M. In TUXFARNE [Tuxford] Elwi and
Ulmer had 1 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 10 ploughs.
There Roger has 4 ploughs and 32 villeins
and 2 bordars having 14 ploughs and i mill
(rendering) 10 shillings and 8 pence. In
King Edward's time it was worth 10 pounds ;
now (it is worth) 8 pounds.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In SCHIDRINTON [now Kirton]3 and
WALESBI [Walesby] (there are) 2 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 6 oxen. There 5 sochmen and i bordar
have 2 ploughs.
S. In AGEMUNTONE [Egmanton] (there are)
l£ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
2 These entries are added at the foot of the
page, with a mark to indicate their proper position
under Marcham.
3 See note p. 250.
259
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
(There is) land for I plough. There I soch-
man and 3 villeins have 2 ploughs. Wood-
(land) for pannage I league in length and half
a league in breadth.
3 M. In AGEMUNTONE [Egmanton] Torche-
tel and Ulmer had 4^ bovates (of land) and
the third part of I bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. There
Roger has 4 ploughs and 13 villeins and 9
bordars having 8 ploughs. There (are) 2
mills (rendering) 30 shillings. In King
Edward's time it was worth 4 pounds and (it
is worth) the same now.
M. In BUCHETONE [Boughton] Mdwi had
3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There (is)
now i plough in demesne and 2 villeins and
i bordar with i plough. In King Edward's
time it was worth 20 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 10 shillings.
M. In ALRETUN [Ollerton] Alwold had
l\ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There now 5
sochmen and I villein have 2 ploughs and
1 mill (rendering) 6 shillings and 8 pence.
In King Edward's time it was worth 20
shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In COTUNE [Gotham] Hardulf had 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There Fulco, Roger's
man, has 8 villeins with 2 ploughs. In King
Edward's time it was worth 16 shillings and
(it is worth the same) now.
4 M. In ORDESHALE [Ordsall] Osward,
Turstin, Ordric and Turstin had 4 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for
4 ploughs. There 2 men of Roger have 3
ploughs and 5 villeins and 2 bordars having 2
ploughs. There (are) 16 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage I furlong in length
and half a furlong in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 28 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 24 shillings.
10 M. In ATTUNE [Eaton] 10 thegns
had each his hall (aulai). Between them
(there were) 6£ bovates of land and the
sixth part of i bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs. There
Fulco, Roger's man, has i plough and 14
villeins and 9 bordars having 7 ploughs and
2 mills (rendering) 20 shillings and 60 acres
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 5
furlongs in length and 3 in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 6 pounds ;
now (it is worth) 3 (pounds).
lln MISNA [Misson] (there is) i bovate of
land (assessed) to the geld. It belongs to
ETTONE [Eaton].
M. In GRAVE [Grove] Alwi and Osmund
had 4^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Robert,
Roger's man, has i£ ploughs and 6 villeins
and 3 bordars and I sochman having 2^
ploughs. There (is) a priest and a church
and 8 acres of meadow. Wood (land) for pan-
nage i league in length and half (a league) in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings and (it is worth) the same
now.
*In ORDESHALE [Ordsall] (there are) i£
bovates. (There is) land for i plough.
S. In RANEBI [Ranby] (there are) 2^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. The soc belongs to
(in) GRAVE. It is waste.
In RANEBI [Ranby] there is I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. The soc belongs to
(in) ETUNE [Eaton],
M. In HEDUNE [Headon] Godric and 6
other thegns had each a hall (hallani). Between
them (there were) 8 bovates of land and the
third part of I bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 5^ ploughs. There
William, Roger's man, has 2 ploughs and 14
sochmen and 9 villeins and 6 bordars having
1 6 ploughs. There (are) 26 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 5 furlongs in length
and 4 in breadth. In King Edward's time it
was worth 4 pounds and (it is worth) the
same now.
S. In UPETUNE [Upton] (there is) half a
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 oxen. There are 3 sochmen
and 2 bordars with I plough and 2 acres of
meadow.
M. In WESTMARCHAM [West Markham]
Godric had 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. There
Roger has 2 ploughs and 4 villeins and 2
bordars having 2 ploughs and 1 6 acres of
meadow. Wood(Iand) for pannage 5 furlongs in
length and 3 in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings (and it is
worth) the same now. Claron holds (it.)
fol. 385.
S. In WESTMARCHAM [West Markham]
(there are) 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. The
soc belongs to (in) TUXFARNE [Tuxford].
1 Added at the foot of the page, with a mark to
indicate its proper position.
* In the margin.
260
HOLDERS OF LANDS
There 6 sochmen and 5 villeins have 4^
ploughs. There (are) 16 acres of meadow.
S. In the same place (there is) I bovate of
land (assessed) to the geld (of which) the soc
belongs to (in) GRAVE [Grove] and I bovate
(assessed) to the geld (of which) the soc
belongs to (in) ETUNE [Eaton] and i bovate
(assessed) to the geld (of which) the soc
belongs to (in) DRAITONE [Drayton]. (There
is) land for half a plough. There 3 sochmen
have 2 ploughs.
2 M. In DRAITONE [West Drayton] Swen
and Ulstan had 4 bovatesofland and 2 parts of
I bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for 2 ploughs. There 2 men of
Roger's have i plough and 8 villeins and I
bordar having 2 ploughs. There (are) 3 mills
rendering 50 shillings and 7 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 3 furlongs in length
and half a furlong in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 30 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 17 shillings and 4 pence.
2 M. In ELCHESLIE [Elkesley] Locre and
Ulchel had 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. There
Claron has I plough, and 3 villeins and I
bordar have i^ ploughs. In King Edward's
time it was worth 26 shillings and (it is worth
the same) now.
M. In BABURDE [Babworth] Ulmar had
2^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There
Geoffrey, Roger's man, has I plough and I
bordar with half a plough. Wood(land) for
pannage 2 furlongs in length and i in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 40
shillings ; now (it is worth) 10 shillings.
2 M. In NORDERMORTUNE [North (?) Mor-
ton] Assord and Lufchel had 2 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 2 ploughs. It is waste. Wood(land) for
pannage I furlong in length and half a furlong
in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 1 6 shillings.
M. In CALDECOTES [Old Coates] Caschin
had I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. It is waste.
There are 6 acres of meadow and 2 mills
(rendering) 20 shillings. In King Edward's
time it was worth 30 shillings.
2 M. In CUCHENAI [Cuckney] Alric and
Ulsi had I carucate of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs.
There Geoffrey, Roger's man, has i plough
and 9 villeins having 3 ploughs. Wood(land)
for pannage 2 furlongs in length and 2 in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 2O shillings ; now (it is worth) 2
shillings less.
2 M. In TORP [Perlethorpe] Turstan and
Ulmer had 10 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs.
There Richard, Roger's man, has 4 ploughs
and 5 villeins and 4 bordars having 2^ ploughs
and 7 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pan-
nage [ ] furlongs in length and 4 in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 40
shillings ; now (it is worth) 26 shillings.
Soc[land] belonging there
S. In GLETORP [Gledthorpe] (there are)
4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 oxen. There 4 soch-
men have 2 ploughs. Wood(land) for pan-
nage I furlong in length and I in breadth.
2 M. In CLIPESTONE [Clipstone] Osbern
and Ulsi had I carucate of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs
There Roger has in demesne i£ ploughs
and (there are) 12 villeins and 3 bordars
having 3^ ploughs, and I mill (rendering)
3 shillings. Wood(land) (fit) in places for
pannage (per /oca pastilis) i league in length and
I in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 60 shillings ; now (it is worth) 40
(shillings).
3 M. In WARESOPE [Warsop] Godric and
Leviet and Ulchel had 3 carucates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 6£
ploughs. There Roger has in demesne 3^
ploughs and (there are) 6 sochmen on (de) 2
bovates of this land and 15 villeins and II
bordars having 3 ploughs. There (is) a priest
and a church and i mill (rendering) 16 pence
and half the site of a mill. Wood(land) for
pannage 5 furlongs in length and 4 in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 64
shillings ; now (it is worth) 4 shillings less.
2 M. In CLUNBRE [Clumber] Adelwol and
Ulchil had 5 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. Part
(2 bovates) is waste, which Fulc holds.
In the other (part) Ulchel has under (sub)
Roger I plough and I mill (rendering) 12
pence. Wood(land) for pannage 2 furlongs
in length and j in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 4 shillings.
S. In ODESTORP [ ] and REDFORD [Ret-
ford] (there are) i£ bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 4 oxen.
The soc belongs to CLUMBRE. It is waste.
M. In WERCHESOPE [Worksop] Elsi had 3
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
261
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
(There is) land for 8 ploughs. There Roger has
i plough in demesne and 22 sochmen (de) on
12 bovates of this land and 24 villeins and 8
bordars having 22 ploughs and 7 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 2 leagues
in length and 3 furlongs in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 8 pounds ;
now (it is worth) 7 (pounds).
2 M. In ROLVETUNE [Rayton] Ulsi and
Archil had i carucate of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. There
Roger, Roger's man, has I plough and 4 soch-
men on 2 bovates of this land and i bordar
with I plough. There (are) 2 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 6 furlongs
in length and 3 in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 2O shillings ;
now (it is worth) 10 shillings. In the same
place (there is) I bovate of land assessed to the
geld. Soc(land). It is waste.
M. In BILLEBI [Bilby] Grimchel had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. There Ingran,
Roger's man, has I plough and 9 villeins and
I bordar having 3 ploughs and 6 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth) 2O
(shillings).
M. In ODESACH [Hodsock] Ulsy had 2
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There
Turold, Roger's man, has 2 ploughs and 3
sochmen on (de] 4 bovates of this land and 12
villeins having 9 ploughs. There (are) 2
mills (rendering) 1 6 shillings and 4 pence and
8 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
I league in length and half a league in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 60 shillings and (it is worth the same)
now.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In ELIDE [Blyth] (there is) I bovate of
land and the fourth part of I bovate (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for I plough.
There 4 villeins and 4 borders have I plough
and i acre of meadow.
1 In the same place (there is) I carucate of
land (assessed) to the geld. (It is) soc(land) of
the king's manor of MAMESFELD [Mansfield].
'In the same place (there is) I carucate of
land. The soc and geld (belong) to (ad) the
king's manor of BODMESCEL [Bottamsall].
6 M. In CARELTUNE [Carlton in Lindrick]
6 thegns had each a hall. Between them all
1 These two entries are in the margin, and
probably refer to Hodsock.
(there were) 2 carucates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs.
There Turold, Roger's man, has 2 ploughs,
and 2 sochmen and 1 6 villeins and 3 bordars
having 4 ploughs. There (is) a church and
2 mills (rendering) 21 shillings and 20 acres
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage i£
leagues in length and half a league in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 4
pounds ; now (it is worth) 3 (pounds).
M. In LUND [Lound] Ulchel had 2 bovates
of land and 2 parts of i bovate (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for i plough. In
demesne there (is) I plough and (there are) 6
villeins with 2 ploughs and 5 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 6 furlongs in length
and 2 in breadth. In King Edward's time it
was worth 20 shillings ; now it (is worth) 10
(shillings.)
M. In SERLEBI [Serlby] Alvric had i£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 oxen. There Gilbert, Roger's
man, has i plough and 5 villeins and 8 bor-
dars with 3 ploughs and I mill (rendering)
3 shillings. In King Edward's time it was
worth 20 shillings and (it is worth the same)
now.
2 M. In TURDEWORDE [Torworth] Brixi
and Caschi had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. Azo
the priest has (it) of Roger and it is waste.
Wood(land) for pannage I league in length
and i furlong in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 20 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 3 shillings.
fol. 28sb.
2 M. In BARNEBI [Barnby Moor] Turverd
and Sorte had I £ bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 4 oxen. It is
waste. There (is) i acre of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage I furlong in length
and half a furlong in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 12 pence.
3 M. In HAREWORDE [Harworth] Wade,
Ulfiet and Ulstan had i carucate of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 2
ploughs. There Fulc, Roger's man, has in
demesne i plough and (there are) 8 villeins
and i bordar with 3 ploughs. There (is) a
church. Wood(land) for pannage i league in
length and I in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 30 shillings.
Soc[land] belonging there
S. In MARTUNE [Martin] there is I caru-
cate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
262
HOLDERS OF LANDS
is) land for 2 ploughs. There 10 villeins
have 5 ploughs. Wood(land) for pannage I
league in length and half a league in breadth.
3 M. In ESTIRAPE [Styrrup] Leving, Tor-
chil and Leuric had 7 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 4
ploughs. There Bernard, Roger's man, has I
plough and 9 sochmen on (de) half a carucate of
this land and 7 villeins and 5 bordars having
3^ ploughs. There (are) 6 acres of meadow
and 10 acres of wood(land) for pannage. In
King Edward's time it was worth 50 shillings ;
now it is worth 25 shillings.
In the same place (there is) I bovate of
land (assessed) to the geld. It is soc(land).
It is waste.
IN LIDE WAPENTAC*
M. In CALUN [Kelham] Turchil and
Godric had 10 bovates of land and the third
part of I bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Turold,
Roger's man, has I plough and 7 sochmen (de)
on 5 bovates of this land and 3 villeins and 3
bordars having i\ ploughs. There (are) 22
acres of meadow. Underwood (si/vee minutes)
1 6 furlongs in length and 74 rods in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 60
shillings ; now (it is worth) 28 shillings.
M. In HOCRETONE [Hockerton] Ulsi and
Turchil had I carucate of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2^ ploughs.
There Roger has in demesne 2 ploughs and
(there are) 1 1 villeins and 4 bordars having 4
ploughs. There (are) 36 acres of meadow.
There (is) a church. Wood(land) for pannage
I league in length and 4 furlongs and 4 rods
in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 4 pounds ; now (it is worth) 3
(pounds).
In CARLETUN [Caunton] Roger has 12
acres of meadow.
2 M. In GRESTORP [Grassthorpe] Dunning
and Grim had 6^ bovates of land and the
fourth part of i bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There Roger,
Roger's man, has 2 ploughs and 4 sochmen
and 1 2 villeins and I bordar having 5 ploughs.
There (are) 3 mills (rendering) 20 shillings
and 12 acres of meadow and 4 acres of
wood(land) for pannage. In King Edward's
time it was worth 3 pounds and (it is worth
the same) now.
1 Now the North Division of Thurgarton
Wapcntake.
S. In SUDTONE [Sutton-on-Trent] there is
I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (It
is) soc(land). It is waste. There (are) 6
acres of meadow.
2 M. In MARNEHAM [High Marnham]
Alvric and Dane had 6^ bovates of land and
the fourth part of I bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. There
Fulo, Roger's man, has i plough and there
I sochman has 12 acres of land and (there
are) 10 villeins and 4 bordars having 4^
ploughs. There (are) 40 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 40
shillings ; now it is worth 20 (shillings).
M. In another MARNEHAM [Low Marn-
ham] Ulsi had 2 carucates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs.
There Roger has in demesne 4 ploughs and
(there are) 2 sochmen on 40 acres of land
and 20 villeins having 7 ploughs and I mill
(rendering) 4 shillings and i fishery and 24
acres of meadow. Underwood (silva minuta)
half a league in length and the same in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 4 pounds ; now (it is worth) 3 pounds.
M. In SCACHEBI [Skegby] Alwold and
Ulchet had I carucate of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2-Jr ploughs.
There 2 men of Roger's have in demesne 3
ploughs and (there are) 7 villeins and 2 bordars
having 3 ploughs. There (are) 16 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage half a
league in length and 3 furlongs in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 48 shil-
lings ; now (it is worth) 40 shillings.
Soc[land]
S. In SUDTONE [Sutton upon Trent] (there
is) I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for half a plough. There I sochman
has I plough.
S. In NORMENTUNE [Normanton upon
Trent] (there is) half a bovate of land (assessed)
to the geld. There 2 villeins and 2 bordars
have i plough.
5 M. In NORMENTUNE [Normanton upon
Trent] 5 thegns, Justan, Durand,2 Elward,
Ulmar, Aseloc, had each his hall (aula) and
each of them (had) I bovate of land and the
fifth part of I bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 12 oxen. There Roger,
Roger's man, has 9 sochmen and 4 bordars
having 3 ploughs and 12 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 10 shil-
lings ; now (it is worth) 6 shillings.
a ' Durand ' is added over ' Aseloc,' marked for
deletion.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
6 M. In WESTONE [Weston] Elmer, Elwi,
Osbern, Grim, Edric, Stenulf had each his
hall (aula}.1 Between them (there were) 6£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 ploughs. There Fulc, Robert
and Turold, Roger's men, have 4^ ploughs
and i sochman and 14 villeins and 3 bordars
having 3^ ploughs. There (is) a church and
I mill and 30 acres of meadow. Wood(land)
for pannage half a league in length and the
same in breadth. In King Edward's time it
was worth 70 shillings ; now (it is worth) 50
shillings.
Soc[land] belonging there (Ibidem).
S. In ODESTORP [ ] and REDFORD
[Retford] (there is) half a bovate of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 4
oxen. There is I villein and the fourth part
of I mill and 4 acres of meadow.
IN TORGARTONE [THURGARTON]
WAPENTAC
M. In GHELUNGE [Gedling] Dunstan had
9^ bovates of land and the third part of I
bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 2 ploughs. There Roger has 2 ploughs
and 9 villeins and I bordar having 2 ploughs
and 10 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage 2 furlongs in length and I furlong in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 32 shillings ; now (it is worth) 40
shillings.
M. In EPRESTONE [Epperstone] and UDES-
BURG [Woodborough] Ulviet had half a caru-
cate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for 12 oxen. There Roger has I plough
and 2 sochmen on (<&) I bovate of this land and
3 villeins having i^ ploughs. There (is) i
mill (rendering) 5 shillings and 4 pence and
3 acres of meadow. In King Edward's time
it was worth 5 shillings ; now (it is worth) I
mark of silver.
M. In GULNETORP [Gunthorpe] Morcarhad
3 carucates of land and 3 bovates (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 6 ploughs.
There Roger has in demense 4 ploughs and
(there are) 5 sochmen on i^ bovates of this
land and 40 villeins and 7 bordars having 1 6
ploughs. There (is) toll (theloneum) and a
(ferry) boat (navli) rendering 30 shillings and 8
pence and 2 fisheries (rendering) 25 shillings
and 1 80 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage 6 furlongs in length and 5 in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 15
pounds; now (it is worth) 10 pounds. Talli-
age (tail/a) 30 shillings.
1 ' Unus quisque \ bo' terre ' in the original, but
deleted.
S. In BERTUNE [Burton Joyce] and LUD-
HAM [Lowdham] (there are) 12 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for
i plough. The soc belongs to (in] GUNNE-
TORP [Gunthorpe]. There 4 sochmen and 2
villeins have I plough. There (are) 4 acres of
meadow.
2 M. In OSTONE [Oxton] Turstan and
Odincarle had i carucate of land (assessed) to
the geld. There is land for 2^ ploughs.
There Roger has 2 ploughs and 5 villeins and
fol. 386.
6 bordars having 2 ploughs and I mill (render-
ing) 5 shillings and 4 pence. In King
Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 60 shillings.
IN RlSECLIVE [RUSHCLIFF] WAPENTAC
M. In STANFORD [Stanford upon Soar] Elsi
had 10 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There Roger
has i plough and 5 sochmen and 3 villeins
and 2 bordars having 2 ploughs. There (is)
half a mill (rendering) 6 shillings and 8 pence
and 1 1 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 30 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 40 shillings.
S. In NORMANTONE [Normanton upon Soar]
(there are) 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for I plough. (It is)
soc(land). It is waste. There (are) 4 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 4 shillings (and it is worth the same)
now.
M. InTuRMODESTUN[Thrumpton] Lewin
and Elnod had 7 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs.
There Roger has i plough and 3 sochmen
and 2 villeins and 2 bordars having i£ ploughs.
In King Edward's time it was worth 40 shil-
lings ; now (it is worth) 20 shillings.
M. In HOLMO [Holme Pierrepont] Toret
had 12 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Roger
has 2 ploughs and 14 villeins and 2 bordars
having 5 ploughs and I mill (rendering) 5
shillings and 80 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 6 pounds and (it
is worth the same) now.
sln BASINFELT [Bassingfield] (there are) 10
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld and 2
parts of I bovate. (There is) land for 2
ploughs. (It is) soc(land) of HOLMO [Holme
1 This paragraph is written at the bottom of the
next column, but is marked for insertion here.
264
HOLDERS OF LANDS
Pierrepont]. There 8 sochmen have 3 ploughs
and 15 acres of meadow.
2 M. In PLUNTRE [Plumtree] Ulfac and
Godric had 1 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. There
Roger has in demense 3 ploughs and (there
are) 33 villeins having 5 ploughs. There (is)
a church and 23 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 60 shillings and
(it is worth the same) now.
Soc[Iand] belonging there
S. In RODDINTONE [Ruddington] (there are)
10 bovates of land and 2 parts of i bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 2
ploughs. There 18 sochmen have 3 ploughs
and 33 acres of meadow.
M. In NORMANTONE [Normanton on the
Wolds] Unfac had 6 bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs.
There Roger has in demesne 2 ploughs and
(there are) 6 villeins and 3 bordars and 4 soch-
men with 3 ploughs. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth)
30 (shillings).
B. IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) (there are)
4^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for half a plough. There 2
villeins and I bordar have half a plough. It
belongs to (jacet) PLUNTRE [Plumtree].
S. In STANTUNE [Stanton on the Wolds]
(there is) half a bovate of land (assessed) to the
geld. There I villein has 5 ploughing oxen
(haves in car'). It belongs to ( pertinet) PLUNTRE.
S. In CAUORDE [Keyworth] (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. There 2
villeins have half a plough. It belongs to
(pertinet) PLUNTRE.
3 M. In CAWORDE [Keyworth] Harold,
Ricard and Frane had 6 bovates of land and
2 parts of I bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There Roger
has 4 sochmen and 3 villeins and 2 bordars
having 3 ploughs. There (are) 16 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 30 shillings ; now (it is worth) 1 7
shillings.
M. In LECHE [Leake] Godric had 2 bo-
vates of land and the third part of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 4
oxen. There Ernulf, Roger's man, has 2
ploughs and 2 villeins with half a plough and
8 acres of meadow. In King Edward's time
it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth)
10 shillings.
In King Edward's time it
now (it is worth) 10
IN BROLVESTou1 [BROXTOW] WAPENTAC
3 M. In Wisoc [Wysall] Estan, Elsi, Glad-
uin had 3 carucates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. There
Roger, Roger's man, has 3 ploughs in demesne
and 1 5 villeins and 5 sochmen on (de) 6 bovates
of this land and I bordar having (habentei) 10
ploughs. There (is) a church. In King
Edward's time it was worth 45 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 48 shillings.
3 In the king's (land of) TORP [Thorpe in
the Glebe] (there are) 7 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld belonging to (pertinentes)
Wisoc [Wysall]. (It is) soc(land). It is
waste. There (are) 6 acres of meadow and
it is worth 2 shillings.
In WILLEBI [Willoughby on the Wolds]
(there is) the fourth part of I bovate of land
(assessed) to the geld. It is waste.
M. In WILGEBI [Willoughby on the
Wolds] Odincar had 6 bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 6 oxen. There
2 sochmen on (tie) I bovate of this land and 3
villeins and 15 bordars have 4 ploughs and 13
acres of meadow.
was worth 20 shillings
(shillings).
2 M. In COTINGESTOCHE [Costock] and
REPESTONE [Rempstone] Godric and Algar
had 13 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 13 oxen. There Roger
has 2 sochmen on (de) 2 bovates of this land and
3 villeins with 2 ploughs. One carucate of
this land is waste. There (are) 30 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings; now (it is worth) 12
shillings.
1 The places which stand under this rubrication,
like those which precede them, belong to Rush-
cliff wapentake. But the rubrication of this fief
is so accurate throughout that the introduction of
a fresh heading at this point probably has a
meaning, which seems to be that these five villages,
in a group at the extreme south of the county,
were annexed, temporarily at least, to the some-
what distant wapentake of Broxtow. This is
borne out by the fact that in Ralf de Burun's fee
Costock and Rempstone both stand under the
Broxtow rubrication. It is also significant that
in these three manors (as in those of Ralf de
Burun's fee) the number of ploughlands is equal
to the numbers of carucates. The average ratio
in the county is more than 2 to I and identity
is very characteristic of the assessment of Broxtow
wapentake. It is to be noted that Roger de
Busli held no manor in the modern wapentake
of Broxtow.
'This entry follows 'Wilgebi,' but is marked
for insertion here.
265
34
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
IN BlNGAMESHOU [BlNGHAM] WAPENTAC
M. In TROCLAUESTUNE [Tollerton] Elsi
had 2 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There Roger
in demesne has i£ ploughs and (there are) n
villeins and i bordar having 3 ploughs and 8
sochmen with 3^ ploughs and 2 mills (render-
ing) 3 shillings. There (is) a church and 30
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time it
was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth) 60
(shillings).
2 M. In LANBECOTE [Lamcote] Frane and
Odincar had 7^ bovates of land and the third
part of I bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. There Roger has i£
ploughs and i villein and 2 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 15
shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In BINGHEHAM [Bingham] Tosti(g) had
3 carucates of land and 2^ bovates (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 5 ploughs.
There Roger in demesne has 4 ploughs and
(there are) 26 villeins and 5 bordars and 14
sochmen having 12^ ploughs. Wood(land)
for pasture I league in length and 8 furlongs
in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 10 pounds and (it is worth the same)
now. In NIWETUNE [Newton] (there are) 3
bovates (assessed) to the geld.
2 M. IN THE SAME PLACE [Ibidem, SC. BlNG-
HEHAM] Hoga and Helga had 5 bovates of
land and 2 parts of I bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for I plough. There
is I sochman and 8 villeins and I bordar
having I plough and 24 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 2O
shillings ; now (it is worth) 13 (shillings).
S. In SCELFORDE [Shclford] (there are) 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. The soc belongs to
(in) BINGHEHAM [Bingham]. There 3 soch-
men have i plough.
M. In BRUGEFORD [East Bridgeford] Odin-
car had 4 carucates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 6 ploughs. There
Roger in demesne has 3 ploughs and (there
are) 2O sochmen on (de) 10 bovates of this land
and 15 villeins and 3 bordars having 1 1
ploughs. There is a priest and a church and
12 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 3 pounds ; now (it is
worth) 5 pounds.
3 M. IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) Turstan
and Roschet and lustan had 6 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for i plough. There (are) 3 acres of meadow.
The land is not cultivated. In King Edward's
time it was worth 8 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 3 shillings.
M. In CHENIVETONE [Kneeton] Ulviet
had 5 bovates of land and the third part of I
bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for i plough. There Roger has i plough
and 2 villeins with i plough and 4 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 10 shillings and (it is worth the same)
now.
2 M. In SAXEDEN [Saxondale] Ulviet and
Unspac had 12 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs.
There Roger has in demesne 2 ploughs and
(there are) 5 sochmen and 5 villeins and 3
bordars having 2 ploughs. There (is) a
church and I acre of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 25 shillings and
(it is worth the same) now.
M. In CLIPESTUNE (Clipston) Ulviet had
3 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Roger
in demesne has 2 ploughs and (there are) 3
sochmen and 12 villeins and I bordar having
6 ploughs. There (are) 20 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 60
shillings ; now (it is worth) 40 (shillings).
M. In WAREBERG [ ] Godric
had 12 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 12 oxen. It is waste.
There (are) 10 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 5 shillings.
M. In ESCREVENTONE [Screveton] Odincar
had 5 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. There i soch-
man with I bordar has I plough. In King
Edward's time it was worth 5 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 8 shillings.
fol. a86b.
M. In COLESTONE [Car Colston] Ulviet had
6 bovates of land and i acre (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 5 ploughs. There
Roger, Roger's man, has 2 ploughs in demesne
and 13 sochmen and 3 villeins and 7 bordars
having 8 ploughs. There (are) 17 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 30 shillings ; now (it is worth) 40
(shillings).
M. In FLINTHAM [Flintham] Odincar had
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There Roger,
Roger's man, has i plough and 2 sochmen
and 3 villeins and 4 bordars having 2 ploughs.
266
HOLDERS OF LANDS
In King Edward's time it was worth 20
shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
S. In the same place (Ibidem) (there are) I ^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 oxen. The soc belongs to (in)
CHENIVETONE [Kneeton]. Ernuin the priest
has it of (de) Roger. There 2 sochmen and
I bordar have I plough. There (are) 8 acres
of meadow.
M. In AILETONE [Elton] Morcar had 7
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 ploughs. There Ralf, Roger's
man, has 3 ploughs and 3 sochmen and 1 1
villeins having 6 ploughs. There (is) a
church and 12 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 4 pounds and (it
is worth the same) now.
M. In OVETORP [Owthorpe] Helge had
half a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There
William, Roger's man, has i plough and 4
sochmen and 8 villeins having 3 ploughs.
There (are) 12 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 30 shillings and
(it is worth the same) now.
IN OSWARDEBEC [OsWARDBECK]
WAPENTAC
3 M. In FENTONE [Fenton] Ulsac and
Levric and Grim had I bovate of land and
the third part of I bovate (assessed) to the
geld. The land is waste except for one bordar
(hard'). There (are) 30 acres of wood(land)
for pannage. In King Edward's time it was
worth 5 shillings.
In the same place (Ibidem) Speravoc had 2
bovates of land and two parts of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. There is land for I
plough with soc and soc (soca et soca) without
a hall (aula). It is waste. There (are) 60
acres of woodland for pannage. In King
Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings and
8 pence and (it is worth the same) now.
2 M. In ESTRETONE [Sturton le Steeple]
Sperhavoc and Archil had 4^ bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 2^
ploughs. There (are) now 2 villeins and 2
sochmen and 2 bordars having 7 ploughing
oxen (boves in car1) and 8 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 6 furlongs in length
and 3^ furlongs in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 2 marks of silver.
(It is worth) the same now.
5 M. In WATELEIA [North Wheatley] 5
thegns had 9 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 8 ploughs. There
Roger has in demesne 4 ploughs and 4 sochmen
and 25 villeins having 12^ ploughs and 5 acres
of meadow. Underwood (silva minuta) I league
in length and I furlong in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 8 pounds and (it
is worth the same) now.
M. In BURTONE [Burton] Sperhavoc had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There Geoffrey,
Roger's man, has I plough and I sochman
and i villein and 2 bordars have !•£ ploughs.
There is I fishery (rendering) 200 eels.
Underwood (silva minuta) I furlong in length
and i in breadth. In King Edward's time it
was worth 20 shillings ; now (it is worth)
40 shillings.
Soc[land] belonging there
S. In EVRETONE [Everton] and HERE-
WELLE [Harwell] there are 2 bovates of land
and 3 parts of I bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. There I
sochman has half a plough and i^ acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage I furlong
in length and i in breadth.
M. In BOLUN [Bole] Turvert had 7
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There now 4 soch-
men and 4 bordars have 3 ploughs. To this
manor belong (adiacent) 6 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld, of which the soc belongs
to (in) SANDEBI [Saundby]. There is land for
2 ploughs. There Geoffrey, Roger's man, has
1 plough and 2 sochmen and 4 villeins and 3
bordars have i^ ploughs. Meadow 8 furlongs
in length and 2 in breadth. Wood(land) for
pannage I league in length and 3 furlongs in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth) 50
shillings.
M. In BECHINGEHAM [Beckingham] Os-
bern had 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for i plough. There
Geoffrey, Roger's man, has i plough and 15
acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
7 furlongs in length and I in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 16 shillings.
M. In WACHERINGEHAM [Walkeringham]
Adestan had lOj bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. There Roger, Roger's man, has 4
sochmen and I villein and 5 bordars having
2 ploughs. Meadow 2 furlongs in length
and I in breadth. Wood(land) 4 furlongs in
length and i in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 2O shillings ; now (it is
worth) 15 shillings.
267
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
5 M. In MINISTRETONE [Misterton] 5
thegns had 13^ bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2^ ploughs.
There Roger has 8 villeins and 5 bordars
having 2^ ploughs. There is a church and
meadow 3 furlongs in length and i£ in
breadth. Wood(land) for pannage 12^ fur-
longs in length and 2 furlongs in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 20
shillings ; now (it is worth) 2 shillings
more.
7 M. In GRINGELEIA [Gringley on the
Hill] 7 thegns had 3 carucates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 8
ploughs. There Roger, Roger's man, has 3
ploughs and 10 villeins and 6 bordars having
8 ploughs. There is a church and I fishery
(rendering) 1,000 eels and 40 acresof meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage I league in length
and 3 furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 10 pounds ; now (it is
worth) 4 pounds.
Soc[land] belonging there
S. In MINISTRETONE [Misterton] (there
are) 7^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 12 oxen. There 5 soch-
men and I villein and 5 bordars have i£
ploughs. Meadow 4 furlongs in length and
half (a furlong) in breadth. Wood(land) for
pannage 4 furlongs in length and i^ furlongs
in breadth.
S. In HEREWELLE [Harwell] and EVRE-
TONE [Everton] (there are) 3 bovates of land
and three parts of I bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for I plough. There
i sochman and I villein have half a plough
and 3 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage 5 furlongs in length and 2 in
breadth.
M. In BOLUN [Bole]1 Ulmer had i£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. There Roger has i
plough and the fourth part of a church and 2
mills (rendering) 32 shillings and 10 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings (and it is worth) the same
now.
M. In CLAUORDE [Clay worth] Grinchil had
2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
' Bolun' may stand here, and on page 267, for
Bolham, another village in this wapentake. But
it appears (Thoroton, iii. 280) that the latter
was reckoned part of the manor of Gringley,
while Bole certainly later was part of the honour of
Tichhill. Also the fact that Bole formed a pre-
bend in York Cathedral suggests its identification
with the ' Bolun ' of the Archbishop of York's see
on page 255.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. There Fulc,
Roger's man, has 3 sochmen and 3 bordars
with 3! ploughs. Meadow, 2^ furlongs in
length and 1 8 perches in breadth. Wood-
(land) for pannage 3 furlongs and 10 perches
in length and the same in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 4 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 5 shillings.
M. In CLAUREBURG [Clarborough] Ragen-
ald had 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. There
Fulc, Roger's man, has half a plough and 8
villeins and i bordar with i^ ploughs and 7
acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
4 furlongs in length and 2 in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 6 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 20 shillings.
fol. 287.
IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) Ulchil had half
a bovate of land (assessed) to the geld with
sac and soc (saca et soca). (There is) land for
2 oxen. The same Ulchil himself holds (it)
of (de) Roger and has there 2 bordars with 2
oxen and i acre of meadow. Wood(land)
for pannage 2 furlongs in length and i in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 16 pence and (it is worth the same)
now.
M. In TIRESWELLE [Treswell] Godric had
6 bovates of land and the third part and the
fifteenth part of I bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs. There
Roger, Roger's man, has 2 ploughs and 14
villeins and 5 bordars having 5 ploughs.
Meadow 4 furlongs in length and i furlong
in breadth. Wood(Iand) for pannage 4 fur-
longs in length and i£ furlongs in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 50
shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
In CLEDRETONE [South Leverton] (there
are) 3^ bovates and half a fifth part of I bovate
of land (assessed) to the geld. Roger has this
land and there he has 7 villeins having i£
ploughs. There (is) half a church. There
is wood(land) for pannage i£ furlongs in
length and i furlong in breadth and meadow
i£ furlongs in length and i furlong in breadth.
Roger has half of this wood(land) and meadow.
It is worth 10 shillings. (There is) land for
i plough.
7 M. In RAMETONE [Rampton] 7 thegns
had 2 carucates of land and 3 bovates and the
fifth part of i bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 7^ ploughs. There
Roger de Busli with his four men has 3
ploughs, and 1 1 sochmen and 8 villeins and 6
bordars having 5^ ploughs. There (is) a
church and 3^ fisheries (rendering) 3 shillings
268
HOLDERS OF LANDS
and 6 pence. There are 65 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 54
shillings ; now (it is worth) 4 shillings less.
Soc[land]
S. In MADRESSEI [Mattersey] (there is) i
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. There
(is) i sochman and 2 acres of meadow.
IX. THE LAND OF WILLIAM
PEVEREL
M. In COLEWIC [Colwick] Godric had 7
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. There William
Peverel has i plough in demesne and 7
villeins and 6 bordars having 3 ploughs.
There is a priest and a church and 2 serfs and
1 mill (rendering) 5 shillings and half a
fishery and 30 acres of meadow and 15 acres
of underwood (silva minutai). In King
Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 40 (shillings). Walan holds
it.
2 M. In SIBETORP [Sibthorpe] Lewine and
Turber had 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 13 oxen. There
Robert, William's man, has I plough and 5
villeins with i plough and i mill (rendering)
2O pence and 1 7 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 24 shillings.
M. In GUNNULVESTUNE [Gonalston] and
MILETUNE [Milton] Ulsi cilt had 2 carucates
of land and 2 bovates and two parts of i bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 3
ploughs. There William in demesne has I
plough and 2 sochmen on (de) 3 bovates of this
land and 7 villeins and 2 bordars and 2 rent-
paying tenants (censures) having 3 ploughs and
2 mills (rendering) 40 shillings and 10 acres
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 5 fur-
longs in length and 3 in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 4 pounds ; now
(it is worth) 60 shillings.
M. In TURMODESTUN [Thrumpton] Staple-
win had 3 bovates of land and 3 parts of i
bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for i plough. There 4 sochmen have i
plough and 5 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 5 shillings and 4
pence and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In CLIFTUN [Clifton] the Countess
Gode had 2^ carucates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 5 ploughs. There
William has 2 ploughs in demesne, and 4
sochmen and 19 villeins and 8 bordars having
9 ploughs. There (is) a priest and a church
and i mill (rendering) 1 2 pence and 1 2 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it
was worth 16 pounds ; now (it is worth) 9
pounds.
1 In BARTONE [Barton in Fabis] (there
are) 2 bovates and the third part of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for i
plough. There 3 sochmen have 2 ploughs
and 3 acres of meadow.
S. In WILESFORDE [Wilford] soc(land) (there
are) 3 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 ploughs. There 23
sochmen have 7 ploughs. There (is) a priest
and 1 8 acres of meadow and half a fishery.
S. In BRIGEFORDE [West Bridgeford]
soc(land) (there are) 12 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 3
ploughs. There William has half a plough
in demesne and 3 sochmen and 4 villeins and
2 bordars having 4^ ploughs and 12 acres of
meadow.
S. In NORMANTUN [Normanton on the
Wolds] (there are) i£ bovates. In CAUORDE
[Keyworth] the third part of i bovate. In
WILLEBI [Willoughby on the Wolds] 2i
bovates. In STANTUN [Stanton on the Wolds]
2 bovates and the fourth part of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 2
ploughs. The soc belongs to (in) CLIFTUNE
[Clifton]. There (are) 4 sochmen and i
villein and i bordar having 3 ploughs. There
William has in demesne in STANTUN [Stanton]
I plough and 2 acres of meadow.
S. In COTINGESTOCHE [Costock] (there is)
I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. There
I sochman has I plough and 2 acres of
meadow. There is land for i ox.
In ALBOLTUNE [Adbolton] (there are) 6
bovates (assessed) to the geld.
S. In BASINGFELT [Basingfield] (there are)
5 bovates of land and 3 parts of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for i
plough. There 2 sochmen and 2 bordars
have I plough and 5 acres of meadow.
S. In GAMELESTUNE [Gamston] (there are)
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. There 2 sochmen have
i plough and 7 acres of meadow.
M. In REDEFORD [Radford] Alvric had 3
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. There William in
demesne has 2 ploughs and 1 1 villeins and 4
fol. a8?b.
bordars having 4 ploughs. There (are) 4
mills (rendering) 3 pounds and 30 acres of
meadow and 3 acres of underwood (silva
minuta) and half a fishery. In King Edward's
1 This entry stands in the margin.
269
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
time it was worth 4 pounds and (it is worth
the same) now.
Of the same land Ulnod holds i bovate in
the thegn-land.
4 M. In STAPLEFORD [Stapleford] Ulsi cilt
and Stapleuin and Godwin and Gladuin had
2 carucates of land and 6 bovates (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs.
There William has in demesne (Robert holds
of (de) him) 3 ploughs and 6 villeins and 2
serfs with 6 ploughs. There (is) a priest and
a church and 58 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 60 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 40 (shillings).
M. In MORTUNE [Morton]1 Bovi had i£
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 12 oxen. There William
has 1 1 ploughs and 5 sochmen on (de) 3
bovates of this land and 12 villeins and i
bordar having 9^ ploughs. In King Edward's
time it was worth 20 shillings and (it is
worth the same) now.
M. In NEUBOLD [Newbold] Morcar had
12 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There William
in demesne has i£ ploughs and 9 villeins hav-
ing 3 ploughs and 40 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 60 shillings
and (it is worth the same) now.
S. In LENTUNE [Lenton] (there are) 2
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. The
soc belongs to (in) NEUBOLD. (There is) land
for 2 ploughs. There 4 sochmen and 4 bor-
dars have 2 ploughs and a mill.
3 M. In LIDEBI [Linby] 3 brothers had i£
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There William has 3
ploughs and 12 villeins and 2 bordars having
5 ploughs. There (is) a priest and i mill
(rendering) 10 shillings. Wood(land) for
pannage i league in length and i league in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 26 shillings and 8 pence ; now (it is
worth) 40 shillings.
In PAPLEWIC [Papplewick] 5 bovates of land
belong to (adjacent) this manor.
M. In BASEFORD [Basford] Alwin had 10
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 1 2 oxen. There Safrid, William's
man, has i plough and 2 villeins and 5
bordars and i sochman having 2^ ploughs.
There (is) a priest and i acre of meadow and
i acre of wood(land). In King Edward's
time it was worth 20 shillings and (it is worth
the same) now.
1 Near Nottingham but now lost : given by
William Peverel to Lenton Priory at its endowment.
M. In LENTUNE [Lenton] Unlof had 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for half a plough. Now it is in the
wardship (custodia) of William. There the
same Ulnod has i plough and i villein and i
bordar having i plough and i mill (rendering)
I O shillings and i o acres of meadow and i o
acres of underwood (silva minuta). In King
Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 1 5 (shillings).
M. In TOVETUNE [Toton] Aldene had 3
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3^ ploughs. There Warner,
William's man, has 3 ploughs and 4 sochmen
on 3 bovates of this land and 16 villeins and
3 bordars having 6 ploughs. There (is) half
a church and a priest and 2 mills (rendering)
8 shillings and 100 acres of meadow and
a little plantation of willows (salictum). In
King Edward's time it was worth 60 shillings
and (it is worth the same) now.
Soc[land] of this manor
S. In CHIDEWELLE [Chilwell] (there are) 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
M. In STRALEIA [Strelley] Godric had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 6 oxen. There Godwin the priest
has of (de} William i plough and 3 villeins
and 2 bordars having 2 ploughs. In King
Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings, and
(it is worth the same) now.
M. IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) Brun had
3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. Am-
brose now holds (them) of (de) William. In
King Edward's time it was worth 3 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 12 pence.
M. In GRISELEIA [Greasley] Ulsy had 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. There William has I
plough and 5 villeins and 2 bordars having 3
ploughs. There (is) a priest and a church.
Wood(land) for pannage 9 furlongs in length
and 6 furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 1 6 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 10 shillings.
M. IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) Ulsi had 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. It is waste. Ailric
holds (it) of (de} William.
M. In BRUNESLEIA [Brinsley] Brun had 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for half a plough. There Ailric has under
(sub) William i plough and i villein having i
plough and 2 acres of meadow. Wood(land)
for pannage 6 furlongs in length and 3$
furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's time
270
HOLDERS OF LANDS
it was worth 6 shillings and 8 pence ; now (it
is worth) 4 shillings.
M. In ESTEWIC [Eastwood] Ulfchetel had
4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land [ J.1 It is waste (and)
is in the wardship of William (Willelmus cus-
todit). Wood(land) for pannage 3 furlongs in
length and 3 in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 5 shillings.
M. In NEUTORP [Newthorpe] Grinchel
had 7 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
There is land for half a plough. It is waste.
In King Edward's time it was worth 5
shillings ; now (it is worth) 2 shillings.
3 M. In BESTUNE [Beeston] Alfag and Al-
wine and Ulchel had 3 carucates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs.
There William in demesne has 2 ploughs and
(there are) 17 villeins and I sochman having
9 ploughs. There (are) 24 acres of mea-
dow. In King Edward's time it was worth
30 shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In OLAVESTUNE [Wollaton] Ulsi cilt
had i £ carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 12 oxen. There Warner,
William's man, has I plough and 7 sochmen
and 4 villeins having 4 ploughs. Under-
wood (silva minuta) I league in length and I
furlong in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 100 shillings ; now (it is worth)
60 shillings.
B. In COTESHALE [Cossall] berewick (there
are) 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 oxen. There in
demesne (is) I plough and (there are) 2 villeins
and I acre of meadow. Wood(land) for pan-
nage 4 furlongs in length and 2 in breadth.
S. In BRUNECOTE [Bramcote] soc(land)
(there are) 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. It is waste.
S. In SUDTONE [Sutton Passeys] soc(land)
(there are) 1 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. It is
waste.
2 M. In BILEBURG [Bilborough] Ailric and
Ulsi (and) Suen had 7 bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for the same
number of oxen. There Ambrose, William's
man, has i plough and 2 sochmen and 3
villeins and 4 serfs with I plough. There are
8 acres of meadow, and underwood (silva
minuta). In King Edward's time it was
worth 30 shillings, now (it is worth) 20
shillings.
The amount of the land is omitted.
M. In NUTEHALE [Nuthall] Aldene had
4^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for the same number of oxen.
There William has i£ ploughs and 3 villeins
and 4 bordars having i plough. Underwood
(silva minuta) 5 furlongs in length and I in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth I o shillings and (it is worth the same)
now.
In BROCHELESTOU [Broxtow] there belong
(adiacent) 5 acres.
S. In WATENOT [Watnall] soc(land) (there
are) 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
M. In WATENOT [Watnall] Grinchel had
1 carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. There William
has 3 ploughs in demesne. Wood(land) for
pannage 5 furlongs in length and 2 in breadth.
M. In WATENOT [Watnall] Siwart had 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
S. In the same place (Ibidem) Grim (had) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. The
soc belongs to (in) WATENOT [Watnall].
S. In the same place (Ibidem) JElmar (had)
2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. The
soc belongs to (in) BULEWELLE [Bulwell].
(There is) land for i plough. There in
demesne (is) I plough, and I sochman and 2
villeins and 2 bordars have 2 ploughs. Wood-
land) for pannage 5 furlongs in length and 3
fol. 188.
furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth)
the same. Gozelin and Grinchel hold (it).
M. In CHINEMARELIE [Kimberley] Azor
had 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld
and Grinchitel 4 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for I plough.
There 2 sochmen and I villein and 5 bordars
have 3^ ploughs. Underwood (silva minuta)
4 furlongs in length and 2 in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings
and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In ELDEURDE* [Awsworth] Alwin
(had) 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
It is waste. It is in the wardship of William
(Willelmus custodit).
M. In HOCHENALE [Hucknall Torkard] 2
brothers had 4 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for half a plough.
There 3 villeins have i plough. In King
Edward's time it was worth 8 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 4 shillings.
S. In HAMESSEL [Hempshill] (there are) 6|
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. There 2 sochmen and
2 Added over ' ibidem.'
271
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
2 villeins and 2 bordars have 2 ploughs and
4 acres of underwood (silva minuta). This
soc(land) belongs to (jacef) BULEWELLK [Bui-
well] and WATENOT [Watnall].
2 M. In BASEFORD [Basford] Alfag and
Algod had 2 carucates of land and 3 bovates
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for
the same number of ploughs and oxen. There
Pagen and Saffrid, William's men, have I
plough and 2 villeins and 5 bordars having 2
ploughs and 3 mills (rendering) 25 shillings and
4 pence, and 6 acres of meadow, and underwood
(silva minuta). In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth) the
same.
In the same place (Ibidem) (there is) I
bovate (assessed) to the geld. Escul held (it).
M. In CORTINGESTOCHES [Costock] Fred-
ghis had 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 oxen. There
Godwin under William has I plough, and 2
villeins (have) I plough and 3 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 10 shillings ; now (it is worth) 5 shil-
lings and 4 pence.
M. In RAMPESTUNE [Rempstone] Fredgis
had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 oxen. There 5 villeins
have i plough and 15 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings;
now it is worth 5 shillings and 4 pence.
2 M. In RADECLIVE [Radcliffe on Trent]
Fredgis had i^ carucates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs.
Now Fredgis and Ulviet under (sub) William
have there 2 ploughs and 15 villeins and 6
bordars having 4 ploughs and 18 acres of
meadow and the site of half a fishery and the
third part of one fishery. In King Edward's
time it was worth 60 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 32 shillings.
M. In ALBOLTUNE [Adbolton] Godwin the
priest had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for I plough. There
William in demesne has I plough and (there
are) 6 villeins and I bordar having 2 ploughs.
There (is) a church and 7 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 10
shillings ; now (it is worth) 20 (shillings).
M. In TIEDEBI [Tithby] Ulvric had 4
bovates of land and 3 parts of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for i
plough. Now Fredgis under (sub) William
holds (it). There i sochman and 5 villeins
and 4 bordars have 2^ ploughs and 20 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 20 shillings; now (it is worth) 10
shillings.
M. In WrvRETUN [Wiverton] Ulvric had
I bovate of land and 3 parts of i bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for
half a plough. There 3 villeins and i bordar
have I plough and 6 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 10
shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In LANGARE [Langar] Godric had 2
carucates of land and 4^ bovates (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 6 ploughs.
There William in demesne has 3 ploughs
and (there are) 1 5 sochmen on 6 bovates of
this land and 19 villeins and 6 bordars having
I 1 ploughs and 2 mills (rendering) 5 shillings
and 50 acres of meadow. There i free man
(francus homo) has i plough. In King
Edward's time it was worth 100 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 10 pounds.
S. In WIVRETUNE [Wiverton] soc(land)
(there are) 3^ bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for i plough. There
7 sochmen and i bordar have 3 ploughs and
2 oxen and 8 acres of meadow.
M. In BERNESTUNE [Barnston] Godric and
Azor had each a hall (aula) and each (had) 4
bovates of land and 7 parts of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 4
ploughs. There William in demesne has 3
ploughs and (there are) 7 sochmen on 4
bovates of this land and 7 villeins and 6
bordars having 4^ ploughs. There (are) 36
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time it
was worth 10 shillings ; now (it is worth) 4
pounds.
M. In NEUTORP [Newthorpe] Grinchel
had 5 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for half a plough.
B. In the same place (Ibidem) (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 oxen. (It is) a berewick of (in)
CHINEMARELEIE [Kimberley]. Each (of these
estates) is waste.
In MENNETUNE [Manton] Elwin and
Ulviet (had) i carucate of land (assessed) to
the geld for 2 manors. (There is) land for 2
ploughs. There are 3 sochmen with 3
ploughs. It was and is worth 10 shillings.
In SALESTUNE [Selston] Ulmer, Gladuin
and Ulvric had 3 bovates of land for 3
manors. There is land for i plough.
There 4 villeins and 2 bordars have 2 ploughs.
There (is) a church and 3 acres of meadow.
Formerly it was worth 8 shillings ; now it is
worth 10 shillings.
272
HOLDERS OF LANDS
In BULWELLE [Bulwell] Godric had 2
carucates of land for a manor. (There is)
land for 2 ploughs. There is i plough and i
villein and I bordar and 2 acres of meadow.
Formerly it was worth 1 2 shillings ; now it
it worth 5 shillings.
fol. 288b
X. THE LAND OF WALTER DE
AINCURT
M. In FLODBERGA [Flawborough] Ulvric
had 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There Walter
de Aincurt has I plough and 4 villeins with i
plough. In King Edward's time it was
worth 20 shillings and (it is worth the same)
now.
M. In STANTUNE [Staunton] Tori had 10
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. There (are) now 3
ploughs in demesne and 4 sochmen on (de) I ^
bovates of this land and 1 1 villeins and 2
bordars having 2 ploughs. There (is) a priest
and a church and i mill (rendering) 5
shillings and 4 pence and 80 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 4
pounds ; now (it is worth) 100 shillings.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In ALVRETUN [Alverton] and FLOD-
BERGE [Flawborough] and DALLINTUNE
[Dalington] (there are) 6 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 2
ploughs. There 12 sochmen have 3 ploughs
and i oo acres of meadow. Malger holds (it).
2 M. In COTES [Gotham] Suen and Tori
had 9 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 ploughs. There
Walter in demesne has i plough and (there
are) 10 villeins and 8 bordars having 3 ploughs.
There (is) a priest and a church and 60 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 100 shillings ; now it is worth 6
pounds.
Soc [land]
S. In FLODBERGE [Flawborough] (there are)
i£ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. There (are) 24
acres of meadow. There 5 sochmen have i£
ploughs and 24 acres of meadow.
M. In STOCHES [East Stoke] Tori had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There in demesne (is)
I plough and (there are) 3 villeins and 5
bordars having half a plough and 60 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 60 shillings ; now (it is worth) 40
(shillings). Osbert holds (it).
S. In HOUTUNE [Hawton] (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. There 6 sochmen have
2 ploughs and 20 acres of meadow.
M. In HOCRETUNE [Hockerton] Tori had
3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There Walter
has I plough and 5 villeins and 5 bordars
having half a plough and 1 6 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage I league in length
and i£ furlongs in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 15 (shillings).
M. In CHENAPETORP [Knapthorpe] Tori
had 4^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There in
demesne (is) I plough and (there are) 5
villeins and 3 bordars having i^ ploughs and
2 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
8 furlongs in length and 2 in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 2O shillings
and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In BULECOTE [Bulcote] Swen cilt had
2 carucates of land and 2 bovates (assessed) to
the geld, and in the same place (ibidem) 15^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld, soc(land)
of the same manor. (There is) land for 5^
ploughs. There in demesne is i plough and
(there are) 8 sochmen and 1 1 villeins and 12
bordars and 2 serfs with 3 ploughs. There
(are) 76 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pan-
nage, scattered (per loco) I league in length and
8 furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 4 pounds and (it is worth
the same) now.
M. In OxETUNE1 [Oxton] Tori had 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 1 2 oxen. There (is) i sochman on
(de) the third part of I bovate of this land with
I bordar having half a plough and 4 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 1 6 shillings ; now (it is worth) 5
shillings and 4 pence.
M. In TURGARSTUNE [Thurgarton] and in
HORSPOL [Horsepool]2 Suainhad 3 carucates of
land and 3 bovates (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 ploughs. There
Walter has in demesne 2 ploughs and 10
sochmen on (de) 9 bovates of this land and 12
villeins and 2 bordars having 6 ploughs.
There is a priest and a church and 40 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage i league
in length and half a (league) in breadth. In
1 [O]'stune' interlined.
SA decayed farm about I
Thurgarton,
mile north of
273
35
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
King Edward's time it was worth 3 pounds ;
now (it is worth) 4 pounds.
In TIEDBI [Tithby] (there are) 2 bovates
(assessed) to the geld.
M. In HORINGEHAM [Hoveringham] Suain
had 2 carucates of land and 2 bovates (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs.
There Walter has in demesne 2 ploughs and
(there are) 6 sochmen on (de) 3 bovates and the
third part of I bovate of this land and 9
villeins and 3 bordars having 4 ploughs.
There (is) a priest and a church and 2 mills
(rendering) 40 shillings and 2 fisheries (render-
ing) 8 shillings and 40 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 4 pounds ;
now (it is worth) the same and 10 shillings
more.
S. In FISCARTUNE [Fiskerton] Walter has
half acarucate of land (assessed) to the geld, of
which (unde) the soc belongs to (pertinet)
SUDWELLE [Southwell]. There he himself
has I plough and (there are) 3 villeins with I
plough.
S. In MORTUNE [Morton] Walter has half
a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld, of
which (de qua] the soc belongs (pertinet) to
SUDWELLE. There he himself has I plough
and 3 villeins have I plough.
S. In FARNESFELD [Farnsfield] Walter has
2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. One
is in the soc of SUDWELLE and the other in
the king's (soc), but nevertheless it belongs
(pertinet) to the hundred of SUDWELLE. There
(is) i plough in demesne. In King Edward's
time it was worth 5 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 8 shillings.
M. In ROLDESTUN [Rolleston] Tori had 1 1
bovates of land and the fourth of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 2
ploughs. There (is) I plough in demesne and
(there are) 8 villeins and 6 bordarj having 3
ploughs and 3 oxen. There is a priest and a
church and 32 acres of meadow. Wood(land)
for pannage 4 furlongs in length and 2 in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth) 60
shillings.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In CALUN [Kelham] (there are) 9
bovates of land and the third part of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for z\
ploughs. There 18 sochmen and 3 bordars
have 7 1 ploughs and 1 6 acres of meadow.
Underwood (si/va minuta) 9 furlongs in length
and 50 rods in breadth.
M. In FISCARTUNE [Fiskerton] Tori had 2
carucates of land and 2 bovates (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 5 ploughs.
There Walter has in demesne i plough and
(there are) 1 1 villeins having 4 ploughs.
There (are) 2 mills and i fishery and I
ferry (passagium) (rendering) 46 shillings
and 8 pence and 42 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 2 furlongs in length
and i furlong in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 3 pounds ; now (it is
worth) 4 (pounds).
S. In this FISCARTVNE Walter has 6
bovates of land of which (unde} the archbishop
has the soc.
M. In ASLACHETUNE [Aslockton] Tori had
i carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There
Walchelin, Walter's man, has 2 ploughs and
1 sochman on (de) i bovate of this land and 6
villeins and 2 bordars with i£ ploughs and 24
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time it
was worth 30 shillings and (it is worth the
same) now.
S. In HOCHESUORDE [Hawksworth] (there
is) I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 oxen. Soc(Iand). There
2 sochmen and i bordar have 2 ploughing
oxen (bovei in car1) and 2 acres of meadow.
M. In COLESTUNE [Car Colston] Tori had 2
bovates of land and a half and i acre of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for I
plough. There I bordar ploughs with I
ox. There are 3 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth I o shillings ;
now (it is worth) 5 shillings. Walchel holds
it.
M. In FLINTEHAM [Flintham] Tori had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There I sochman
and 7 villeins and i bordar have 2 ploughs
fol. 389.
and 24 acres of meadow. Raynold, Walter's
man, has I plough. Underwood (sUva
minuta) I furlong in length and i furlong in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 20 shillings and (it is worth the same)
now.
M. In GRANEBI [Granby] Haminc had i £
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 ploughs. There Walter in
demesne has 4 ploughs and (there are) 44
villeins and 9 bordars having IO ploughs.
There (is) a priest and a church and i mill
(rendering) 2 shillings and 200 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 12 pounds ; now (it is worth) 20
pounds.
274
HOLDERS OF LANDS
The Soc of this Manor
S. In BERNESTUNE [Barnston] (there is)
half a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There 5
sochmen and i bordar have 2 ploughs and 2
ploughing oxen (beves arantei) and 1 1 acres of
meadow.
S. In LANGARE [Langar] (there are) 4^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There 8 sochmen
have 2 ploughs and 6 ploughing oxen. There
(is) half a church and 1 3 acres of meadow.
S. In WIVRETUNE [Wiverton] (there are)
6^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There 5
sochmen have 2 ploughs and 2 ploughing oxen
and 20 acres of meadow.
In HECHELINGE [Hickling] (there are) 2
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There 8
sochmen and I villein and 10 bordars have 5
ploughs. There (is) a mill (rendering) 16
shillings and 80 acres of meadow.
S. In CHINELTUNE [Kinoulton] (there are)
7 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There (are) 9
sochmen and 4 bordars having 3 ploughs and 7
ploughing oxen and 2O acres of meadow.
S. In CROPHILLE [Cropwell Butler] and
WIVRETUNE [Wiverton] (there are) 4 bovates
of land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for i plough. There 4 sochmen and 7
bordars have 2 ploughs and 13 acres of
meadow.
M. In RADECLIVE [Radcliffe on Trent]
Suain had i£ carucates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs.
There in demesne are 2 ploughs and (there
are) 14 villeins and 3 bordars having 2
ploughs and 19 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings and
(it is worth the same) now.
XII. THE LAND OF GEOFFREY
ALSELIN
In LAXINTUNE [Laxton] Tochi had 2 caru-
cates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 6 ploughs. There Walter, a
man of Geoffrey Alselin's, has I plough and
22 villeins and 7 bordars having 5 ploughs
and 5 serfs (servi) and I female serf (ancilla)
and 40 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage I league in length and half a league
in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 9 pounds ; now (it is worth) 6
pounds.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In SCHIDRINCTUNE [Kirton] * (there are)
2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. There 3 soch-
men have i plough.
In WILGEBI [Willoughby] there is i
orchard (ortum) belonging (pertinent) to LAXIN-
TUNE [Laxton].
S. In WALESBI [Walesby] (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 oxen. There 2 sochmen have
I plough.
S. In ECHERINGHE [Eakring] (there is)
half a bovate of land (assessed) to the geld.
It is waste.
S. In ALMENTUNE [Ompton] (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. It is
waste.
S. In CHENAPETORP [Knapthorpe] (there
is) I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. It
is waste. (There is) land for 2 oxen.
S. In CALNESTUNE [Caunton] (there are)
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There 8
sochmen and 10 bordars have 5 ploughs.
There (is) I mill (rendering) 2 shillings and
8 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
I league in length and 4 furlongs in breadth.
S. In BESTORP [Beesthorpe] (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for half a plough. There 2 sochmen
and I bordar have half a plough and half an
acre of meadow. (There are) 10 acres of
wood(land) for pannage.
S. In CARLETUN [Carlton on Trent] (there
is) I carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. There 4 soch-
men have 2 ploughs and 20 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 4 furlongs in length
and 4 in breadth.
M. In NORDMUSCHAM [North Muskham]
Ulvric had 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs. There
in demesne is I plough and (there are) 4
villeins and 7 bordars having i^ ploughs.
There (is) I mill (rendering) 10 shillings and
12 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 30 (shillings).
2 In the same place (Ibidem) (there are) 2^
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. In demesne
are 3 ploughs and (there are) 16 sochmen and
5 villeins and 2 bordars with 6 ploughs.
There are 2 mills (rendering) 20 shillings and
40 acres of meadow and 40 acres of wood-
1 See note, p. 250.
* This entry is added in the margin.
275
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
(land). Formerly (it was worth) I OO shillings;
now it is worth 4 pounds. Tochi held it for
a manor.
S. In the same place (Ibidem} (there are)
4 bqvates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. Soc(land). It is waste.
There (are) 12 acres of meadow.
S. In CARLETUN [Carlton on Trent] (there
is) i bovate of land (assessed) to the geld.
There are 2 sochmen having nothing.
M. In WILGEBI [Willoughby] Tochi had
i£ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. It is waste.
There (is) half a mill and 1 2 acres of meadow.
M. In STOCHES [Stoke Bardolph] and
GHELLINGE [Gedling] Tochi had 3 carucates
and 2 bovates and 2 parts of I bovate (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs.
There in demesne Geoffrey has 2 ploughs and
(there are) 15 villeins and 6 serfs and 21 bor-
dars having 8 ploughs. There (is) a priest
and a church and I fishery and 2 mills (ren-
dering) 20 shillings and 30 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 3 furlongs in length
and 3 furlongs in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth HO shillings ; now (it is
worth) 6 pounds.
S. In CARENTUNE [Carlton by Nottingham]
and GHELLINGE [Gedling] and COLEWI [Col-
wick] (there are) 1 5 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs. There
30 sochmen have 10^ ploughs and 20 acres of
meadow. Underwood (si/va minuta) 3 fur-
longs in length and I in breadth.
M. In BERTUNE [Burton Joyce] Suen had
I carucate of land and the fourth part of I
bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 2 ploughs. There Geoffrey has I soch-
man on (de) 5 acres of land and 5 villeins and
I bordar and I serf and I female serf (ancilla).
All together (simul) they have 3 ploughs.
There (is) a church and a priest and 1 6 acres
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 2 fur-
longs in length and I in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth I mark of silver
and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In SCELFORD [Shelford] Tochi had 4
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 8 ploughs. There (are) now 36
villeins and 12 bordars having 9 ploughs and
fol. a8gb.
i mill (rendering) 4 shillings and I fishery.
There (is) a priest and a church. In King
Edward's time it was worth 8 pounds; now
(it is worth) 4 pounds.
The Soc of this Manor
S. In NEUTONE [Newton] (there are) 9
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. There (are) 9 soch-
men and 4 bordars having 4 ploughs and 4
acres of meadow.
In OBETORP [Owthorpe] Tochi had i
carucate of land (assessed) to the geld. Nothing
is had there.
In CHENATORP [Knapthorpe] (there is) half
a bovate (assessed) to the geld. It belongs to
(jacet) NORTWELLE [Norwell].
In CARLENTUN [Carlton on Trent] (there
are) 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for half a plough. There
(are) 4 sochmen and 3 acres of meadow.
Formerly it was worth 8 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 3 shillings.
XIII. THE LAND OF RALF THE
SON OF HUBERT
M. In BARTONE [Barton in Fabis] Levric
had 13 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. There
Ralf the son of Hubert has 2 ploughs
and 1 8 villeins and 5 bordars having 5^
ploughs. There (are) 48 acres of meadow.
Underwood (silva minuta) 2 furlongs in length
and half a furlong in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 6 pounds ; now
(it is worth) IOO shillings, with the two
CILUELLIS [Chilwell] in which (are) 7 sochmen
and half a church.
M. In THE SAME PLACE [Ibidem, sc. BAR-
TONE] Ulvric had 2 bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for I plough.
There Ralf has i plough and 2 villeins and i
bordar with i plough. In King Edward's
time it was worth 20 shillings and (it is worth
the same) now.
B. In CLIFTUNE [Clifton] (there are) 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld belonging
(pertinentes) to BARTONE [Barton in Fabis].
S. In CILLEWELLE [Chilwell] and ESTRE-
CILLEUELLE [East (?) Chilwell] (there are) 3
carucates of land and 3 bovates (assessed) to
the geld. It is (soc)land belonging to (de)
BARTONE [Barton in Fabis]. (There is)
land for 4^ ploughs. There Ralph has I
plough and 2 sochmen and 5 villeins and 13
bordars having 6 ploughs and 2 ploughing
oxen (haves arantei). There (are) 70 acres of
meadow and half a church and 4 acres of
underwood (silva minuta) and 4 acres of
willow plantation (salictum).
In CIDWELLE [Chilwell] (there are) 5
bovates of soc(land) (assessed) to the geld
belonging to (i») TOLVESTUNE [Toton].
276
HOLDERS OF LANDS
M. In BONEI [Bunney] Levenot had 2
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 ploughs. There Ralf
has in demesne 2 ploughs and (there are) 1 8
villeins and 7 sochmen and 2 bordars having
7 ploughs. There (is) a church and a priest
and I mill (rendering) 12 pence and 1 60
acres of meadow and underwood (silva minuta)
10 furlongs in length and I in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 4 pounds ;
now (it is worth) 60 shillings.
M. In CAWORDE [Keyworth] Frane had
5 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. There Ralf has i£
ploughs and 3 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 10 shillings.
M. In TEVRESHALT [Teversall] Levric
had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i£ ploughs. There Ralf has
2 ploughs and I sochman on (de} I bovate of
land and 9 villeins having 3^ ploughs. There
is I mill (rendering) 1 6 shillings and 8 acres
of meadow and underwood I league in length
and I in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 60 shillings ; now (it is worth)
30 (shillings). Geoffrey holds (it).
M. In CHIRCHEBI [Kirkby in Ashfield]
Levenot had 10 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs.
There Ralf has in demesne 3 ploughs and
(there is) I sochman on (de) I bovate of land and
20 villeins and 6 bordars having 12 ploughs.
There is a church and a priest and 2 mills
(rendering) 3 shillings and 3 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) (fit) in places for pannage (per loca
past1) 2 leagues in length and I in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 4 pounds ;
now (it is worth) 3 pounds.
M. In WANDDESLEI [Wansley] Levric
had 5 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There Ralf
has half a plough and 3 villeins and 2 bordars.
There (is) a priest and half a church and 4
acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
4 furlongs in length and 4 in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 8 shillings;
now (it is worth) 10 shillings.
M. In ANESLEI [Annesley] Levenot had I
carucate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 oxen. There Ralf has I
plough and 1 9 villeins and I bordar having 7
ploughs and 3 acres of meadow. Wood(land)
for pannage I league in length and I league in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was worth
40 shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
Ricard holds (it).
In COTESHALE [Cossall] Levenot had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for the same number of oxen. There
are 3 ploughs with 3 villeins and 5 acres of
meadow. Formerly (it was worth) 1 6 shil-
lings ; now it is worth 10 shillings.
In GIPESMARE [Gibsmere] and MORTUN
[Morton] (there is) I carucate of land and 3
bovates (assessed) to the geld. The soc be-
longs to (de) SUDWELLE [Southwell]. (There
is) land for 3^ ploughs. It was and is worth
28 shillings.
In WIMARSPOL [Widmerpool] (there is) I
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld and it
belongs (facet) to BONEI [Bunney].
XIIII. THE LAND OF RALF DE
LIMESI
M. In HOLTONE [Hawton] Tored had 4^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There Ralf de Limesi
has 2 ploughs and 4 sochmen on (de) 2^ bovates
of land and 5 villeins and 5 bordars having 3
ploughs. There (is) a priest and 2 churches
and I mill rendering 5 shillings and 4 pence.
4 M. IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) Bugo,
Rainald, Toruet and Bugo had 6i bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 2^ ploughs.
Soc [land]
S. IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) (there are)
5 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. On these lands (In his
terns) are 1 8 sochmen and 2 villeins and 10
bordars having 6 ploughs. Alvred holds
these 5 manors of (tie) Ralf. In King Ed-
ward's time it was worth 100 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 4 pounds and 10 shillings.
Soc [land]
In DORDENTORP [Danethorpe] (there is) i
bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 oxen. There 5 sochmen and
6 bordars have 2 ploughs. There (is) a
church and a priest with i plough and 80
acres of meadow.
M. In EPSTONE [Epperstone] and UDEBURG
[Woodborough] Ulvric and Elsi, (who had) no
hall,1 had 3 carucates of land and 4 bovates
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 6
ploughs. There Ralf has in demesne 3
ploughs and (there are) 14 sochmen on (de) 6
bovates and a farthingland (ferding) (i bovate)2
of this land and 12 villeins and 10 bordars
having 6 ploughs. There (is) a church and a
1 ' n aula ' interlined above Elsi.
2 ' i bov' ' interlined above 'ferding?
277
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
priest and 4 mills (rendering) 77 shillings and
8 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
2 leagues in length and 9 furlongs in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 5
pounds ; now (it is worth) 7 pounds.
In GUNNULVESTONE [Gonalston] Ralf
Limesi has 5 bovates and the third part of
i bovate1 (assessed) to the geld.
M. In TORP [Thorpe by Newark] Ulvric
had 6£ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There Main-
frid, Ralf s man, has I plough and 9 villeins
and 5 bordars having 3 ploughs and 72 acres
of meadow.
S. In SCELTUN [Shelton] and COLINGEHAM
[Collingham] (there are) 5^ bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 3
ploughs. There (are) 8 sochmen and 5 vil-
leins having 3 ploughs and 60 acres of
meadow and 2 acres and I rood of wood(land)
not for pannage. In King Edward's time it
was worth 4 pounds ; now (it is worth) 40
shillings.
fol. 290.
XV. THE LAND OF RALF DE
BURUN
BERNESEDELAU [BASSETLAW] WAP[ENTAC]
M. In OSCHINTONE [Ossington] Osmund
had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Ralf
de Burun has 3 ploughs and 4 sochmen on (de)
half a bovate of this land and 16 villeins and
6 bordars having 6 ploughs and 28 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 2 leagues
in length and I league in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 60 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 40 (shillings).
In ALMENTUN [Ompton] (there are) 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. There 2 bordars have
i plough.
M. In CALUN [Kelham] Osmund had 2
bovates of land and the third part of i bovate
(assessed) to the geld. There William, Ralf 's
man, has i plough and 3 bordars with 2
ploughing oxen and 9 acres of meadow.
Underwood (siha minuta} 8 furlongs in length
and 12 rods in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 1 6 shillings.
BROCOLVESTOU [BROXTOW] WAPENT[AC]
M. In HOCHEHALE [Hucknall Torkard]
Ulchet had 12 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs.
1 Interlined above ' iiii. car' terra ' erased.
There Osmund, Ralf 's man, has i plough and
5 villeins having 3^ ploughs. Wood(land)
for pannage, I league in length and half (a
league) in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 30 shillings ; now (it is worth)
15 shillings.
M. In CORTINGESTOCHE [Costock] Seric
and his 2 brothers had 14 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 14
oxen. There William, RalPs man, has 3
ploughs and I sochman on (de) 2 bovates of land
and 9 villeins and 4 bordars having 5 ploughs.
There (are) 30 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 30 shillings.
M. In RAMPESTONE [Rempstone] Ulchetel
had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 oxen. It is waste. In
King Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings;
now (it is worth) 2 shillings. There (are)
10 acres of meadow.
BlNGAMESHOU [BlNGHAM] WAP[ENTAC]
M. In LANBECOTE [Lamcote] Ulchet had
5 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. There
Osmund, Robert's man, has I plough and I
villein and 6 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings, and
(it is worth the same) now.
M. In GODEGRAVE [Cotgrave] Oghe had
2 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There in
demesne are 3 ploughs ; and (there are) 7
sochmen and 4 villeins and 4 bordars having
4^ ploughs. There (is) half a church.
Underwood (s'tha minuta) I furlong in length
and I furlong in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 60.
M. IN THE SAME PLACE [Ibidem] Turchil
had i carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There Gozel,
Ralf's man, has half a plough and 5 villeins
and i bordar having 2 ploughs. There (are)
30 acres of meadow. Underwood (silva
minuta) half a furlong in length and half (a
furlong) in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 10 shillings and (it is worth) the
same now.
In GODEGRAVE [Cotgrave] Warner has 6
bovates of the land of the same manor.
XVI. THE LAND OF ROGER OF
POITOU
BERNESEDELAV [BASSETLAW] WAP[ENTAC]
M. In GAMELESTUN [Gamston] Gamel
and Suain had i carucate of land (assessed)
278
HOLDERS OF LANDS
to the geld. (There is) land for 8 ploughs.
There Roger of Poitou has in demesne 2
ploughs and (there are) 7 sochmen on (de) 2
bovates of this land and 3 villeins and I
bordar having 3^ ploughs. There (are) 2
mills (rendering) 40 shillings and 20 acres of
meadow and 2O acres of underwood (silva
minuta). In King Edward's time it was worth
4 pounds (and it is worth) the same now.
M. IN THE SAME PLACE [Ibidem] Chetel-
bern had I bovate of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for I plough. Chetel-
bern has this (manor) of (de) Roger, and there
he has I plough and 2 bordars and 3 acres of
wood(land) fit in places for pannage (per loco
past'). In King Edward's time it was worth
2O shillings and 8 pence ; now (it is worth)
12 shillings.
TORGARTONE [THURGARTON] WAPENT[AC]
M. In CALVRETONE [Calverton] Ulvric had
3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. There are now 2
villeins and i rod of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 5 shillings and 4 pence.
RlSECLIVE [RUSHCLIFE] WAPENT[AC]
M. In EDWOLTONE [Edwalton] Stepi had
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 12 oxen. There in demesne (is)
now I plough and (there is) I villein and 16
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time it
was worth 30 shillings ; now (it is worth) 10
shillings.
2 M. In WILGEBI [Willoughby on the
Wolds] Godric and Ernui had 6£ bovates of
land and 2 parts of I bovate (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 12 oxen. There
(are) now in demesne i£ ploughs and (there
are) 2 sochmen and 6 villeins and 2 bordars
having 2^ ploughs. There (are) 9 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 50 shillings ; now (it is worth) 22
shillings.
BlNGAMESHOU [BlNGHAM] WAPENT[AC]
M. In CROPHELLE [Cropwell Butler] Ulvric
had 2 carucates and 6 bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 6 ploughs.
There Roger has 3 ploughs and 8 sochmen
and 17 villeins having 6 ploughs. There
(are) 20 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage half a league in length and 4 furlongs
in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 8 pounds ; now (it is worth) 100
shillings.
M. In GODEGRAVE [Cotgrave] Ulvric had
3 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There Roger
has I plough in demesne, and 6 sochmen and
IO villeins and I bordar having 5 ploughs.
There (are) 30 acres of meadow. Under-
wood (silva minuta) 2 furlongs in length and
1 in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 4 pounds ; now (it is worth) 40 shil-
lings.
M. In WARBERGA [ ] Fredgis had
13^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There Roger
has I plough and 2 sochmen and i bordar
having I plough and 10 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 10
shillings ; now (it is worth) 12 shillings.
M. In HOCTUN [Haughton] Baldric had
12 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. It is waste.
There (are) 1 6 acres of meadow and wood-
(land) for pannage I furlong in length and 8
perches in breadth. In King Edward's time
it was worth 60 shillings ; now (it is worth)
2O shillings.
Soc[land]
S. In WALESBI [Walesby] (there is) half
a bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 oxen. It is waste.
M. In DRAITUN [West Drayton] Suain had
2 bovates of land and the third part of I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for i
plough. Now Ulsi holds (it) of (de) Roger
and there he has half a plough and i villein
and i bordar with half a plough. There
(are) 3 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage I furlong in length and half a fur-
long in breadth. In King Edward's time it
was worth 10 shillings ; now (it is worth)
5 shillings and 4 pence.
In WILGEBI [Willoughby on the Wolds]
Ernui had 5 bovates of land for a manor.
(There is) land for the same number of
oxen. There are 2 ploughs with i villein
and 6 bordars and 4 acres of meadow. For-
merly (it was worth) 20 shillings; now it
is worth 10 shillings.
fol. agob.
XVII. THE LAND OF GILBERT
DE GAND
NEWERCE [NEWARK] 1 WAP[ENTAC]
M. In BUCHETUN [Boughton] Ulf2 had 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
1 In error for Bassetlaw Wapentake.
1 This seems to be the ' Ulf fenisc ' of the pro-
logue to the shire's survey. In the original a blank
is left after his name whenever it appears in this
column. In Derbyshire ' Ulf fenisc ' was the ' ante-
cessor ' of Gilbert de Gand in the manor of Ilkeston.
279
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
is) land for 3 ploughs. There Gilbert de
Gand has 3 villeins and i sochman and I
bordar having 3^ ploughs. There (are) 4
acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
3 furlongs in length and 3 in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 20 shillings;
now (it is worth) i o shillings.
M. In SCHIDRICTUNE [Kirton] 1 Ragenalt
had 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for half a plough. There 4
villeins have 2 ploughs. Wood(land) for
pannage I furlong in length and I in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 20
shillings ; now (it is worth) 10 shillings.
M. In ALRETUN [Ollerton] Wade had 5^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. There William,
Gilbert's man, has I plough and 6 sochmen
on (de) 2 bovates of land and 3 villeins having
6 ploughs. There (are) 2 mills (rendering) 1 6
shillings. Wood(land) for pannage I league
in length and 4 furlongs in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings;
now (it is worth) 30 shillings.
M. In RUGFORDE [Rufford] Ulf had 12
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 ploughs. There Gilbert in
demesne has i plough and (there are) 10
villeins having 3 ploughs. There (are) 20
acres of meadow. Wood(land) i£ leagues in
length and i league in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 6 pounds ; now
(it is worth) 60 shillings.
Soc[Iand belonging] there
S. In BILDESTORP [Bilsthorpe] (there are)
2 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 ploughs. There 13
sochmen and 6 bordars have 6 ploughs and 4
acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
I league in length and 4 furlongs in breadth.
B. In WIRCHENEFELD 2 [ ] there is
I carucate of land (assessed) to the geld. (It
is) a berewick. It is waste.
M. In ECHERINGHE [Eakring] Ingolf had
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There Wil-
liam, Gilbert's man, has I plough and 3 soch-
men on 3 bovates of this land and 2 villeins
and 3 bordars having 2 ploughs. There (is)
a priest and a church and 3 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 6 furlongs in length
and 4 in breadth. In King Edward's time
1 See note p. 250.
1 Appears in an inquisition of 36 Hen. Ill as
'Wackfeld in the forest of Wiclewod," but no
further identification can be made.
it was worth 20 shillings ; now (it is worth)
1 6 shillings.
M. IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) Eche-
brand had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. The
same Echebrand holds (it) of (de) Gilbert and
has there I plough and 6 sochmen on (de)
4 bovates of land and 2 villeins and 2 bordars
having 2£ ploughs. There (are) 3 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 6 furlongs
in length and 4 in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 20 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 1 6 shillings.
M. In CHENESHALE [Kneesall] and
CHERVESHALE [Kersall] Ulf had 1 2 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 4 ploughs. There Gilbert in demesne
has 3 ploughs and (there are) 8 sochmen on (de)
3 bovates of land and 16 villeins and 4 bordars
having 12 ploughs. There (are) 22 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage I league
in length and half (a league) in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 8 pounds ;
now (it is worth) 6 pounds.
Soc[land belonging] there
S. In ALMENTUN [Ompton] (there are) i^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 oxen. There 2 sochmen and i
bordar have 2 ploughs.
S. In MAPLEBERG [Maplebeck] (there are)
14 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 ploughs. There Gilbert
(has) I plough and 9 sochmen on (de} io£ bovates
of this land and 5 bordars having 4 ploughs
and 30 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage i league in length and 3 furlongs in
breadth.
M. In CREILEGE [? Wellow »] Ulf had 2*
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. There
is land for 4 ploughs. There Gilbert has 2
ploughs and 22 villeins and 2 bordars having
9 ploughs and 26 acres of meadow. Wood-
(land) for pannage half a league in length and
half (a league) in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 6 pounds ; now (it is worth)
3 pounds.
In CHERLINTON [Kirklington] Ulf had 4^
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. The soc belongs to
the archbishop's manor of SUDWELLE [South-
well]. There Gilbert has I plough and 4
* According to Thoroton, iii, zoo, ' Creileye '
included the modern village of Wellow. Gilbert
of Gaunt gave ' Cratela ' to RufFord Abbey at its
foundation ; the name persists for some time, then
ceases, and ' Wellhagh ' takes its place among
the possessions of the abbot of RufFord.
280
HOLDERS OF LANDS
villeins h(aving) 2 ploughs and I mill (render-
ing) 1 6 shillings. In King Edward's time it
was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth) 30
shillings.
In NORMANTUN [Normanton by Southwell]
Ulf had 3^ bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for I plough. There
Gilbert has 4 villeins with i plough. The
soc belongs to (in) SUDWELLE [Southwell]. In
King Edward's time it was worth 1 6 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 8 shillings.
M. In RODDINTON [Ruddington] Ulf had
half a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There (is) now
in demesne i plough and (there are) 4 soch-
men and 5 villeins and 2 bordars having 3
ploughs. There (are) 33 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 20 shil-
lings ; now (it is worth) 8 shillings.
BlNGAMESHOU [B INCH AM] WAPENT[AC]
M. In WATONE [Whatton] Ulf had 2^
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 9 ploughs. There Roger, Gil-
bert's man, has 3 ploughs and 28 villeins and
12 bordars having 9 ploughs and i mill
(rendering) 4 shillings and 80 acres of meadow.
There (is) I stone pit (mo/aria) where mill
stones (molte) are quarried rendering (afc) 3
marks of silver. In King Edward's time it
was worth 20 shillings ; now (it is worth) 8
(shillings).
Soc[land] of the same Manor
S. In HocHEswoRDE1 [Hawksworth] (there
are) 13 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There 2O
sochmen and I bordar have 4^ ploughs and 20
acres of meadow.
S. In HASLACHESTONE [Aslockton] (there is)
half a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for \\ ploughs. There 9
sochmen have 4 ploughs.
fol. 391.
XVIII. THE LAND OF GILBERT
TISON
M. In AIGRUN [Averham] Suain had 3
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 6 ploughs. There Gilbert Tison
has in demesne 2 ploughs and (there are) 8
sochmen on 6 bovates of land and 2 1 villeins
and 22 bordars having 12 ploughs. There
(is) a church and a priest and I mill (render-
ing) 5 shillings and 80 acres of meadow.
Underwood (silva minuta) 8 furlongs in
1 Originally ' Holesworde,' but the first five
letters are erased and ' Hoches ' is added above
them.
length and 4 in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 6 (pounds) ; now (it is
worth) 10 pounds and 12 pence. To this
manor belong (appendunt) 5 sochmen in other
hundreds.
S. In CRUNWELLE [Cromwell] (there are)
2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. There 2 soch-
men have i plough.
M. In FENIGLEI [Finningley] Suain had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. There Gilbert has
half a plough and 15 villeins and 4 bordars
having 5^ ploughs. Wood(land) for pannage
2 leagues in length and 2 in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 45 shillings.
M. In CALUN [Kelham] Alvric had 2
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 6 oxen. There (is) i sochman
and I bordar with half a plough and 6 acres of
meadow. Underwood (silva minuta) 8 fur-
longs in length and 14 rods in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 16 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 3 shillings.
M. In WICHEBURNE [Winkburn] Suain
had 12 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Gil-
bert has 2 ploughs in demesne and 15 soch-
men on 4 bovates of land and 7 villeins and 5
bordars having 7 ploughs. There (is) a church
and 1 6 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage I league in length and half a league
in breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 100 shillings ; now (it is worth) 60
shillings. 5 thegns held 2 bovates of this land.
One of them was the senior of the others.
This (land) did not belong to Suain.
M. In ALWOLDESTORP [ ] a Ade-
stan had 4 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. There Gilbert
has I plough in demesne and 4 bordars.
There (are) 10 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 2O shillings ; now
(it is worth) 10 shillings.
BLIDEUORDE [BLIDWORTH] HUNDRED
M. In STARTORP [Staythorpe] Suain had 9
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. There Gilbert has I
plough and 12 villeins and 4 bordars having
4^ ploughs and i mill (rendering) 5 shillings
and 60 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 60 shillings (and it is worth)
the same now.
2 Identified by Thoroton with Caythorpe near
Lowdham.
281
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
XIX. THE LAND OF GEOFFREY
DE WIRCE
M. In LANDEFORDE [Langford] Levric had
2 carucates of land, and 3 bovates and the
fifth part of i bovate (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 8 ploughs. There
Rannulf, the man of Geoffrey de Wirce, has
2^ ploughs and 16 sochmen and 17 villeins
and 4 bordars having 7 ploughs. There (is)
a priest and a church and 2 mills (rendering)
12 shillings and I fishery and IOO acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 4 pounds ; now (it is worth) the same
and 10 shillings more.
XX. THE LAND OF ILBERT DE
LACI
M. In SIBETORP [Sibthorpe] Pilewin had
1\ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. Now Ilbert
de Laci has (it). Arnegrim holds of (de) him.
There is I plough in demesne and 3 sochmen on
(de) half a bovate of land and 16 bordars having
3 ploughs and the third part of I mill (render-
ing) 10 pence and 10 acres of meadow. The
fourth part of this land belongs to the church
of the same manor. There (is) a priest. In
King Edward's time it was worth 30 shillings
and (it is worth the same) now.
Soc[land]
S. In SCELTUN [Shelton] and ALVRITON
[Alverton] and CHILVINTUN [Kilvington] and
TORUENTUN [Thoroton] (there are) 3 bovates
of land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for I plough. There 6 villeins and I bordar
have 2 ploughs and 30 acres of meadow.
M. In STOCHES [East Stoke] Turchil had
5 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. Mainfrid holds (it) of
(de) Ilbert and has there half a plough and 3
sochmen and 5 bordars having I plough and
2 ploughing oxen (boves arantes) and 64 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 20 shillings ; now (it is worth) 15
(shillings).
In ELVESTUNE [Elston] Ilbert has 3 dwell-
ings (mansura:) in which are 2 sochmen and I
bordar belonging to (ad) STOCHAS [East Stoke].
They have no land.
Ilbert claims the priest's land against Bishop
R(emi) and in STOCHES [Stoke] he claims the
fourth part of the vill.
M. In ELVESTUN [Elston] Godwin had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 ploughs. Arnegrim holds (it) of
(de) Ilbert and has there I plough and 3 soch-
men on 2 bovates of land and i villein and 5
bordars having 2 ploughs. There (are) 30
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time
it was worth 40 shillings ; now (it is worth)
25 shillings.
M. In ASLACHETONE [Aslockton] Leving
had i bovate of land (assessed) to the geld
with sac and soc (saca et soca). (There is)
land for half a plough. Ulvric holds (it) of
(de) Ilbert, and there he has 2 ploughing oxen
(boves arantes) and 2 sochmen and I bordar
having half a plough and 8 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 5 shil-
lings and 4 pence (and it is worth) the same
now.
2 M. In CROPHILLE [Cropwell Butler]
Ulviet and Godric had 4 bovates of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 2
ploughs. Ilbert de Laci was seised of this
estate (terra), but when Roger of Poitou re-
ceived (his) estate he seised this manor away
from (super) Ilbert. The wapentake (court)
bears witness that Ilbert was seised. Now it
is in the king's hand except the third part and
the thegn(land) (tainum) which is the head of
the manor, which Ilbert holds. There is now
I plough in demesne and 4 sochmen having
9 ploughing oxen (boves in car') and 6 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was worth
16 shillings; now (it is worth) 10 shillings.
In ECHELINGE [Hickling] (there are) 3^
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. Tur-
chil and Godwin held (it) for 2 manors.
(There is) land for 8 ploughs. In demesne
are 3 ploughs ; and 4 sochmen and 23 villeins
with i bordar have 6 ploughs. There (are)
2OO acres of meadow. Formerly (it was
worth) 6 pounds ; now it is worth 4 pounds.
fol. agib.
XXI. THE LAND OF BERENGER
DE TODENI
M. In STOCHES [East Stoke] Sbern croc had
2^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. Berenger de
Todeni has (it). Ralf, his man, holds (it).
There he has i plough and 2 villeins and 3
bordars ploughing with 2 oxen. There (are)
40 acres of meadow. In King Edward's time
it was worth 12 shillings ; now (it is worth)
10 shillings.
M. In SIRESTUN [Syerston] Sbern croc had
1\ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. Godwin holds
(it) of Berenger, and has there i plough and i
sochman and 2 villeins with half a plough.
There (are) 10 acres of meadow. In King
282
HOLDERS OF LANDS
Edward's time it was worth 30 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 20 shillings.
In BRODEHOLM [Broadholm] Turgot and
Halden had 5 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. It is
waste. Now Berenger de Xodeni and William
de Perci have (it.) The land belongs (iacet) to
NEWERCE, [Newark] but the service (opus) of
the villeins belongs to SAXEBI [Saxelby] in
LINCOLESCIRA [Lincolnshire]. There (are) 30
acres of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage
I league in length and another in breadth.
XXII. THE LAND OF HUGH THE
SON OF BALDRIC
M. In CHELVINCTONE [Kilvington] and
ALURITONE [Alverton] Colegrim had 3 bovates
of land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 2 ploughs. Hugh the son of Baldric has
(it), Ansger holds (it) of (de) him, and has
there 2 ploughs and I sochman on half a
bovate of land, and 3 villeins and 2 bordars
having 2 ploughs and 20 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 30 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 20 shillings.
M. In CUCHENAI [Cuckney] Suen had 2
carucates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 ploughs. Richard holds (it) of
Hugh and has there 2 ploughs in demesne and
3 sochmen on (de) 2 bovates of land and
10 villeins and 5 bordars having 3 ploughs.
There (is) a priest and a church and 2 mills
(rendering) 8 shillings. Wood(land) for pan-
nage 4 furlongs in length and 4 furlongs in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 30 shillings and (it is worth the same)
now.
XXIII. THE LAND OF HUGH DE
GRENTEMAISNIL
In EDWOLTUN [Edwalton] Gode had 6
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for z\ ploughs. There Hugh de
Grentemaisnil has in demesne 2 ploughs and
(there are) 6 sochmen and I villein having \\
ploughs and 20 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 20 shillings. It belongs to
STOCTUN [Stockerston, Leicester].
In TURMODESTUN [Thrumpton] (there are)
i^ bovates (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for I plough. There (are) 2 sochmen
and 2 bordars with 2 ploughs and 3 acres of
meadow. It belongs (iacet) to SANDIRIACA
[Sandiacre, Derby].
XXIIII. THE LAND OF HENRY
DE FEREIRES
M. In LECCHE [East Leake] Siward had
2 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 6 ploughs. There Henry
de Ferrariis has in demesne 4 ploughs, and
(there are) 16 sochmen and 16 villeins having
1 7 ploughs. There (is) a priest and a church
and I mill (rendering) 2 shillings and 50
acres of meadow and underwood (silva
minuta) 2 furlongs in length and I in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 6
pounds ; now (it is worth) 7 pounds.
To this manor belongs (adiacet) the bere-
wick of LECCHE [West Leake] where there
are 2 carucates of land to the geld. This
belongs to (iacet in) PLUNTRE [Plumtree]
Hundred.
In BONNITON [Bonnington] Siward had i£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 4 oxen. There 3 villeins have i^
ploughs and 3 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 6 shillings (and
it is worth) the same now.
In WILGEBI [Willoughby on the Wolds]
(there is) I bovate of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 oxen. The soc
belongs to (in) BADELEIE [ ].1 It is
waste. There (are) 6 acres of meadow.
XXV. (THE
LAND OF)
MALET
ROBERT
M. In BRADEMERE [Bradmore] Azor had
12 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Robert
Malet has in demesne 3 ploughs and (there
are) 16 villeins and 8 bordars having 5 ploughs.
In King Edward's time it was worth 60
shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
S. In RODINTONE [Ruddington] (there is)
I bovate of land and the third part of I
bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 2 oxen. The soc belongs to (in) BRADE-
MERE [Bradmore].
XXVI. (THE
LAND OF)
MALET
DURAND
M. In OVETORP [Owthorpe] Rolf had half
a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 ploughs. There Durand
Malet has I plough and 4 sochmen and 3
villeins having 2 ploughs. There (are) 12
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time it
was worth 30 shillings ; now (it is worth) 20
shillings.
1 See Introduction, p. 233.
283
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
fol. 331.
XXVII. THE LAND OF OSBERN
THE SON OF RICHARD
M. In GRENEBI [Granby] 1 Earl Algar had
3 carucates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 10 ploughs. Osbern the
son of Richard has (it) now. Robert de Olgi
holds (it) of him and has there 4 ploughs and
22 sochmen and 14 villeins and 8 bordars
having 10 ploughs. There (is) a priest and a
church and 2 mills (rendering) 10 shillings and
10 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 8 pounds ; now (it is
worth) 15 pounds.
S. In WIVRETONE [Wiverton] (there are)
3^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There 7 soch-
men have 2 ploughs. The soc belongs to
(in) COLETON [Colston Basset],
B. In SALTREFORD [Salterford] (there are)
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. It
is waste. (It is) a berewick of (in) COLETONE
[Colston Basset]. Wood(land) for pannage
I league in length and 4 furlongs in breadth.
XXVIII. (THE LAND) OF ROBERT
THE SON OF WILLIAM
M. In STANFORD [Stanford upon Soar]
/Elfag had I O bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 4 ploughs. There
Robert the son of William has i plough and
4 sochmen and 7 villeins and 2 bordars
having 7 ploughs. There (is) the site of a
mill and 15 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings.
Soc[land belonging] there
S. In LECHE [Leake] 2 (there is) I bovate
of land (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for 4 oxen. There 2 sochmen have I
plough. It belongs to STANFORD.
M. In BROCHELESTOU [Broxtow] Godric
had 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3 oxen. There Robert
has i plough and i villein. Underwood
(silva minuta) i furlong in length and I in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was
worth 1 6 shillings ; now (it is worth) 8
shillings.
XXIX. (THE LAND) OF WILLIAM
THE USHER (Hostiarius)
4 M. In BRUNCOTE [Bramcote] Ulchel,
Godric, Alvric and Levric had 12 bovates of
1 See above, p. 233.
8 ' Leche ' is interlined above ' Stantone,'
which is not however marked for deletion.
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 12 oxen. There William the usher has
i plough and 4 villeins and i bordar having
3^ ploughs. In King Edward's time it was
worth 60 shillings ; now (it is worth) 2O
(shillings).
M. In TORWALLE [Trowell] Uctebrand
had i-J- carucates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 12 oxen. There
William the usher has i plough and 6
villeins with 4 ploughs. There is a priest
and half a church and 6 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 100
shillings ; now (it is worth) 20 shillings.
fol.
XXX. THE LAND OF THE
THEGNS
BERNESEDELAWE [BASSETLAW] WAPENTAC
2 M. In OSBERNESTUNE [Osberton] 3 El-
wine and Ulviet had I carucate of land
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 4
ploughs. Now Suan and Ulviet hold (it) of
the king and have there 5 sochmen having 4
ploughs, and a church and 20 acres of meadow.
Wood (land) for pannage 6 furlongs in length
and 3 in breadth. In King Edward's time it
was worth 60 shillings ; now (it is worth)
10 shillings.
M. In CARLENTUNE [Carlton on Trent]
Ulchel had 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 6 oxen. Alden
has (it) of the king. There 2 bordars have 3
ploughing oxen and 10 acres of meadow.
Wood(land) for pannage 2 furlongs in length
and half (a furlong) in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 5 shillings and 4 pence.
M. In CHENAPETORP [Knapthorpe] Alden
holde of the king 2 bovates of land (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 6 oxen.
There he has i plough and 4 bordars having
I ploughing ox (bovem in car'} and 4 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 2 furlongs
in length and i in breadth. In King Edward's
time it was worth 10 shillings and 8 pence
and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In CRUNWELLE [Cromwell] Alden
holds of the king 2 carucates of land and 6
bovates (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for 4 ploughs. There he has I plough
and 5 sochmen on I carucate of this land
and 8 villeins and 2 bordars having 4^
ploughs. There (is) a church and I mill
8 ' ORMESTUNE ' is underlined for deletion and
' OSBERNESTUNE ' written over it.
284
HOLDERS OF LANDS
(rendering) 12 pence and i fishery. Meadow
6 furlongs in length and 3 in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 60 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 40 (shillings).
M. In LAMBELEIA [Lambley] Ulchet had
2 carucates of land and 2 bovates (assessed)
to the geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs.
Alden holds (it) of the king and has there I
plough and 20 villeins and 3 bordars having
4 ploughs and 3 sochmen on (de) half a carucate
of land with i plough. There (are) 2 mills
(rendering) 20 shillings and 20 acres of
meadow. Wood(land) for pannage I league
in length and 4 furlongs in breadth. In
King Edward's time it was worth 60
shillings and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In UDEBURG [Wood borough] Ulchel
had 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i plough. There Aldene
has 3 villeins having half a plough. In King
Edward's time it was worth 5 shillings and 4
pence and (it is worth the same) now.
M. In NORDMUSCHAM [North Muskham]
Siward had 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 3 ploughs. There
the same Siward has 2 bordars and i mill
(rendering) 10 shillings and 12 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 40 shillings; now (it is worth) 16
shillings.
M. In COLUI [Colwick] Alvric (3) and
Buge (2) had 5 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for I plough.
The same hold (it) of the king and have
there 2 ploughs and I sochman on (de) i
bovate and 6 villeins and i bordar with 2
ploughs. There (are) 31 acres of meadow
and 8 acres of underwood (silva minuta). In
King Edward's time it was worth 25 shillings
and 4 pence.
M. In UDEBURG [Woodborough] Ulchel
had 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. The same
holds (it) of the king and has there I plough
and 3 villeins and i bordar with i£ ploughs
and i mill (rendering) 20 shillings and I rod
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 2
leagues in length and 5 furlongs in breadth.
In King Edward's time (it was worth) 20
(shillings) ; now (it is worth) 30 shillings.
1ln UDEBURG [Woodborough] Alvric has
5 bovates (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for 2 ploughs which are there with 3
villeins and i bordar. There (is) a mill
1 This entry is added in the margin.
(rendering) 20 shillings. The same held it
for a manor in King Edward's time.
M. In NORMENTUN [Normanton] Arnui
the priest has 5 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 2 ploughs. It
is waste.
M. In ODESTORP [ ] Ulmer had
2^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. There in
demesne is i plough and half a mill (rendering)
4 shillings and 10 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 40
shillings ; now (it is worth) 4 shillings.
In CALVRETONE [Calverton] Alvric (has) 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for i plough. There 2 sochmen and
4 villeins have 2 ploughs. Formerly (it was
worth) 16 shillings; now (it is worth) 10
shillings. The same holds (it).
RlSECLIVE [RUSHCLIFF] WAPENTAC
M. In NORMANTUN [Normanton on Soar]
Osgod had 3^ bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for I plough.
There (are) 2 villeins and 2 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time (it was worth) 2O
shillings ; now (it is worth) 6 shillings.
B. In BONNITONE [Bonington] (there are)
i^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for half a plough. It belongs
to NORM(AN)TUN [Normanton]. There (are)
5 villeins with i plough and 3 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time (it was
worth) 6 shillings and (it is worth the same)
now.
M. In the same NORM(AN)TUN Raven
(has) 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld.
M. In SUTONE [Sutton] Leword had 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
Siward holds (it) of the king.
M. IN THE SAME PLACE (Ibidem) Cole-
man (has) l£ bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld.
M. In CHINESTAN [Kingston] Algar had
3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. Sawin holds
(it) of the king and has there 2 villeins with
i plough and the site of a mill and i o acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time (it was
worth) 20 shillings ; now (it is worth) 10
shillings.
M. In RADECLIVE [Ratcliffe upon Soar]
Osgod had I o bovates of land and 4 parts of
i bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
285
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
land for 6 ploughs. Sawin holds (it) of the
king and has there 2 ploughs and 9 villeins
and 3 bordars having 2 ploughs. There (is)
a priest and a church and I mill (rendering)
IO shillings and 6 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 100
shillings ; now (it is worth) 60 shillings.
S. In CHINESTAN [Kingston] (there is) i
carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. There 8
sochmen and 3 villeins have 3 ploughs.
M. In the same place (Ibidem) Ulchet
had I £ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for I plough. Godric holds
(it) now, but the men of the country do not
know from whom (per quern) (or) how.
There is I villein and 6 acres of meadow.
In King Edward's time it was worth 20
shillings ; now (it is worth) 3 shillings.
M. In BARTON E [Barton in Fabis]
had li bovates of land and the fourth part of
i bovate (assessed) to the geld. (There is)
land for i plough. There Sawin has I villein
and 2 bordars with 2 ploughing oxen and 3
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time
it was worth 10 shillings ; now (it is worth)
3 shillings.
M. In GATHAM [Gotham] Godric had 3^
bovates of land and I acre (assessed) to the
geld. There is land for i plough. It is
waste. Sawin has (it). There (are) 12 acres
of meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 10 shillings ; now (it is worth) 2
shillings.
In CLIFTUN [Clifton] Ulchel has of the
king i bovate of land (assessed) to the geld.
There he has I villein with 2 ploughing oxen
(boves arantes) and I acre of meadow.
S. In WILLEBI [Willoughby on the Wolds]
Algar had 2^ bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. The soc belongs to (in) TORP [Thorpe-
in-the-Glebe]. There (are) 2 sochmen with
3 ploughs and 3 acres of meadow.
M. In CHIRCHEBI [Kirkby in Ashfield]
Alvric had 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld. (There is) land for 2 oxen. The
same holds (it) of the king and has there i
plough. In King Edward's time (it was
worth) 5 shillings ; now (it is worth) 2 shil-
lings.
2 M. In BASEFORD [Basford] Alvric had i
bovate (assessed) to the geld (which) is waste,
and Escul i bovate (which) is waste.
3 bovates (assessed) to the geld. These are
waste. There (is) wood(land) for pannage i
league in length and half (a league) in
breadth. In King Edward's time it was worth
2O shillings.
M. In TORWALLE [Trowell] Ulchel had
half a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. It is waste.
Alden has (it). There (are) 2 acres of mea-
dow. In King Edward's time it was worth
10 shillings ; now (it is worth) 5 shillings and
4 pence.
fol. 293.
M. In SRAELiE1 [Strelley] Ulchel had 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 oxen. Now Ulsi and Godwin
hold (it) of the king and have there 4 villeins
and i bordar. In King Edward's time it
was worth 4 shillings ; now (it is worth) 3
shillings.
M. In NUTEHALE [Nuthall] Aschil had
3^ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 3^ oxen. Alvric holds
(it) of the king and has there 6 villeins with
2 ploughs. In King Edward's time it was
worth 10 shillings; now (it is worth) 6 shil-
lings and 8 pence.
M. In ELDESUORDE [Awsworth] Ulchete
had half a carucate of land (assessed) to the
geld. Aldene holds (it).
M. In BASEFORD [Basford] Alvric had 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for half a plough. The same holds
of the king and has there i villein with I
plough and I acre of meadow and 2 mills
(rendering) 1 6 shillings and i acre of under-
wood (silva minuta). In King Edward's time
it was worth 20 shillings and (it is worth the
same) now.
2 M. In WILGEBI [Willoughby on the
Wolds] Sbern and Ulmer had 3 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 3 oxen. Elwin and Ernuin hold (it) of
the king. It is waste. There (are) 5 acres
of meadow and 5 bordars. In King Edward's
time it was worth 10 shillings and 4 pence ;
now (it is worth) 4 shillings.
BlNGAMESHOU [BlNGHAM] WAP[ENTAC]
M. In LAMBECOTES [Lamcote] Ulchel had
5 bovates of land and the third part of i
bovate (assessed) to the geld. Aldene holds
In PAPLEWIC [Papplewick] Alvric and ' « SRAELIE ' is written over ' STADELIE ' under-
Alsa and Elric had 2 carucates of land and lined for deletion.
286
HOLDERS OF LANDS
(it) of the king and has there I plough in
demesne and 6 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time it was worth 10 shillings ; now
(it is worth) 5 shillings.
M. In ASLACHESTONE [Aslockton] Levric
had I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. Ulvric holds (it)
of the king and has there 2 ploughing oxen
(boves in car1"] and 2 sochmen and I bordar
with half a plough. There (are) 8 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was worth
5 shillings and 4 pence and (it is worth the
same) now.
M. In CHINELTONE [Kinoulton] Azor had
I bovate of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 3 oxen. Now Azor's son holds
(it) of the king and has there 3 villeins with
3 ploughing (aranf) oxen and 3 acres of
meadow. In King Edward's time it was
worth 10 shillings ; now (it is worth) 2 shil-
lings and 8 pence.
M. In CLAUREBURG [Clarborough] Ulmer
had i£ bovates of land (assessed) to the geld
with sac and soc (saca et soca) without a
hall. (There is) land for 3 oxen. The same
holds (it) of the king and has there 2 villeins
and 3 bordars with half a plough and 3 acres
of meadow. Wood(land) for pannage 6 fur-
longs in length and 3 in breadth. In King
Edward's time it was worth 3 shillings ; now
it is worth 2 shillings.
NEWERCE [NEWARK] WAP[ENTAC]
M. In SIRESTUNE [Syerston] — (this) is the
kind's l — Turvert had 2 bovates of land
O
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 5
oxen. There 2 villeins and i bordar have i
plough and 5 acres of meadow. In King
Edward's time (it was worth) 10 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 5 shillings.
M. In ELCHESLEIE [Elkesley] Aschil had 4
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for 2 ploughs. Ernuin the priest
holds (it) of the king. There 4 villeins have
i£ ploughs. In King Edward's time it was
worth 8 shillings ; now (it is worth) 10 shil-
lings.
In NORTMORTVN [North (?) Morton] (there
are) 3 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
Aschil held (it), Ernuin holds (it). It is
waste.
M. In MISNA [Misson] Cnut had i£
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
1 Regis est ' interlined.
is) land for 3 oxen. Ernuin has there 4
villeins with half a plough and 2 sochmen
with I plough and a fishery (rendering) 3
shillings. Wood(land) for pannage i furlong
in length and i in breadth. It is worth 8
shillings.
O
S. In the same place [Ibidem} (there are) 3
bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. The
soc belongs to (de) CHIRCHETON [Kirton-in-
Lindsey]. There 6 villeins have 3 ploughs.
M. In CALUN [Kelham] Ulchel had i
bovate of land and 2 parts of i bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 6
oxen. There Aldene has 2 villeins and 2
bordars with I plough and 6 acres of meadow.
Underwood (silva minuta) 8 furlongs in length
and 8 rods in breadth. In King Edward's
time (it was worth) 20 shillings ; now (it is
worth) 10 (shillings).
M. In MUSCHAM [Muskham] Sortebrand
had 6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for i£ ploughs. Seric holds
(it) of the king and has there I sochman and
2 bordars with 2 ploughing oxen (bobus in car')
and 1 2 acres of meadow. Wood(land) for
pannage I league in length and I in breadth.
In King Edward's time it was worth 1 6 shil-
lings ; now (it is worth) 5 shillings.
M. In WIMARSPOLD [Widmerpool] William
had 1 1 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. Aldene has
there 14 sochmen and 2 villeins and 2 serfs
with 6 ploughs and 20 acres of meadow. In
King Edward's time it was worth 40 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 30 shillings.
IN THE SAME PLACE [Ibidem] 4 thegns had
6 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld. (There
is) land for I plough. Alden has there i
sochman with 3 ploughing oxen (tabus in car')
and 6 acres of meadow. In King Edward's
time it was worth 21 shillings; now (it is
worth) 6 shillings.
S. In GUNNULFESTONE [Gonalston] Ernuin
the priest with 4 sochmen had 5 bovates of
land (assessed) to the geld. (There is) land
for 12 oxen. The soc belongs to (in) ERNE-
HALE [Arnold]. There 4 sochmen have I
plough and 5 acres of meadow and 16 acres
of underwood (silva minuta).
M. In TROWALLE [Trowell] Alvric had
half a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 4 oxen. The same holds
(it) of the king and has there 3 villeins with
2 ploughs and 2 acres of meadow. In King
Edward s time it was worth 9 shillings and
(it is worth the same) now.
287
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
M. In the same place (Ibidem) Ulvric had
half a carucate of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for half a plough. Ernuin
has I bordar and I villein with i plough and
2 acres of meadow. In King Edward's time
it was worth 10 shillings ; now (it is worth)
5 shillings and 4 pence.
One bovate of land belongs there (iacet ibi),
Soc(land). It is waste.
M. In ESTRECILLEWELLE [? East Chilwell]
Dunninc had 5 bovates of land (assessed) to
the geld. (There is) land for 5 oxen. Ernuin
has there I villein with half a plough and 12
acres of meadow. In King Edward's time
(it was worth) 5 shillings and 4 pence ; now
(it is worth) 3 shillings and 4 pence.
In WARESHOPE [Warsop] a certain blind
man (cecui) holds I bovate in alms (elemosind)
of the king.
In CLAUREBURG [Clarborough] (there are)
2 bovates of land (assessed) to the geld.
(There is) land for 2 ploughs. Archil held (it).
Ernuin holds (it). There (are) 2 villeins and
6 acres of meadow. It was worth 4 shillings ;
now (it is worth) 2 shillings.
In SUTONE [Sutton Passeys] Alvric and
Brun (had) 1 2 bovates of land (assessed) to the
geld, for 2 manors and Ulsi (had) i£ carucates
(assessed) to the geld. The soc belongs (iacet)
to OLLAVESTONE [Wollaton], There is land
for 3 ploughs. It is waste.
In ORDESHALE [Ordsall] (there is) I bovate
(assessed) to the geld. (There is) land for 4
oxen. Ernui holds (it).
288
0
N
V
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
INTRODUCTION
Neither physically nor strategically do the gentle contours of Notting-
hamshire provide sites for those great hill fortresses to be found on the crests
of the hills in many other counties.
The great water-way of the Trent divides Nottinghamshire as it flows
northwards into the estuary of the Humber ; and many minor rivers, notably
the Soar, Erewash, and Idle, made the very heart of the county easily accessible
to inimical incursions. With few exceptions its natural features did not lend
themselves to fortification ; this was compensated for in the Pennine Range
of Derbyshire, on the west, which over-looked the comparatively level sur-
face of this county, and formed a barrier to the invaders of the territory of
the Coritani, a tribe which occupied approximately the present shires of
Lincoln, Nottingham, and Leicester.
Forest and swamp occupied a large part of Nottinghamshire ; remains
of old woods are extant in the Hays of Birkland and Bilhagh, to the north
of Ollerton and Edwinstowe ; while in the north-eastern extremity the swamps
that intervened between the northern boundary and the Isle of Axholme
were almost impassable.
Viewed through the medium of its earthworks, it appears to have been
sparingly inhabited by early man, possibly owing to the poor protection the
open character of the country afforded. There are few headlands like the
Castle-rock or the old-town area of Nottingham, which could be cut off by
rampart and fosse, to constitute forts. There are, however, a number of
rounded hills, the summits of which have been utilized as military sites.
Though great defensive works of a martial character are absent, we find
numerous sites of moated manor houses, less interesting, possibly, than the
former, but necessary for the preservation of household property and domestic
peace.
Such earthworks as are traceable are here classified according to the
following scheme, adopted by the Congress of Archaeological Societies in
1903 ; and we find examples illustrating all but class H.
Class A. Fortresses partly inaccessible, by reason of precipices, clifls, or water, additionally
defended by artificial works, usually known as promontory fortresses.
Class B. Fortresses on hill-tops with artificial defences, following the natural line of the hill ,•
or, though usually on high ground, less dependent on natural slopes for protection.
Class C. Rectangular or other simple enclosures, including forts and towns of the Romano-
British period.
Class D. Forts consisting only of a mount with encircling ditch or fosse.
Class E. Fortified mounts, either artificial or partly natural, with traces of an attached court
or bailey, or of two or more such courts.
Class F. Homestead moats, such as abound in some lowland districts, consisting of simple
enclosures formed into artificial islands by water moats.
i 289 37
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Class G. Enclosures, mostly rectangular, partaking of the form of F, but protected by
stronger defensive works, ramparted and fossed, and in some instances provided with
outworks.
Class H. Ancient village sites protected by walls, ramparts, or fosses.
Class X. Defensive works which fall under none of these headings.
Class A. — Of the three examples of Promontory Fortresses, Nottingham
is by far the boldest ; but that at Worksop was originally more characteristic.
All in this class are situated on the great ancient thoroughfares ; but none
of them exhibits those prominent features such as are found in the same type
of stronghold in certain other districts.
Class B. — Eight examples only, and those not of a typical character, can
be included in this category of Hill Fortresses ; and even most of those have
perished or are much mutilated. We look in vain for examples of com-
plicated entrances such as are found in many other counties, or for those
stupendous aggers which excite wonder at the skill and patience of their
engineers ; the only one that remains sufficiently perfect to reveal a cunningly
contrived defence is the camp called ' Oldox ' in the parish of Oxton.
Class C. — All but one in this class — of which there are but few in
the county — are of very simple construction. The camps at Arnold and
Harworth meet those requirements generally considered characteristic of
the Roman camps, and that of Southwell recalls to mind some of those en-
trenchments usually attributed to the nation ; but among these the camp at
Woodborough is incomparably the most interesting.
Class D. — The four mounts in Nottinghamshire are also very simple,
that at Lowdham being the best defined.
Class E. — Four only of the mount and bailey type can be found for
our attention. The most interesting is that in Laxton parish, where the
mount is doubled, the main work being crowned by a monticle, and the
design of the double court is distinct.
Class F. — As usual in an agricultural and pastoral country, the moat
defences of manor houses and farmsteads are to be found more abundantly
than in a district of hilly and rocky character. A considerable number are
recorded and apparently many of them have been filled in for modern con-
venience at a comparatively modern date. In those examples left there is but
little to guide us in attributing them to any given age, and although no history
of them is known, they cannot be relegated to a pre-historic period.
Class X. — Those works excluded from either of the above mentioned
divisions are naturally of varied types. The great Bykersdyke is of remote
antiquity ; and the collateral lines of entrenchments at Barton impress
one with the idea of hasty and temporary measures of defence. The
curious series of low mounds on Laxton Common provide food for specula-
tion as to their date and purpose.
PROMONTORY FORTRESSES
[CLASS A]
FARNSFIELD : COMBS FARM CAMP. — On a promontory jutting out east-
ward from the neighbouring high-lands, situated ii miles south-west of
Farnsfield, and 4} miles north-west by west from Southwell, is an irregular
290
Combs
Farm, *'
\
SCALE OF FEET
IOO 200 30O
COMBS FARM CAMP, FARNSFIELD.
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
elliptical camp, commanding the ancient road, the ' Stone Street,' from
Nottingham to Bawtry, that passes south and north-west of its site.
Major Rooke, writing
in 1785, says : —
At a farm on an emi-
nence called the ' Combs,'
a Roman camp is plainly
made out, the ditch and
vallum are perfect at the ,
west end and in most part '
of the south side. The ''%''''/,* <»it
south-eastern part is oc- <*'''<5}'''ffif'fr.f'
• 1111 i *'^ ji. x" ^rft*\\
cupied by the house and
garden ; here I found frag-
ments of Roman bricks and
tiles turned up in plough-
ing. About fifty yards to
the north of the camp is
a circular vallum of earth near forty yards in diameter, part of which has been lately destroyed
by the plough. The camp, which is fully 250 yards long and seventy yards wide, commands
an extensive view NW. over Sherwood Forest. The great road from Southwell to Mansfield
goes through Farnsfield between this and the Hexgreave camp.1
About 3 acres of ground are enclosed by the fosse, in which several
weapons were found in the beginning of the eighteenth century ; and some
ninety years later two small implements of war resembling battle-axes, but of
diminutive size, made of copper, and cast in a mould, were found near these
works in a bed of ashes 2 ft. beneath the surface ; one of these, illustrated
by Major Rooke, is a bronze socketed and fluted celt.
NOTTINGHAM : THE CASTLE AREA AND PRECINCTS are situated on a
sandy rock which towards the south forms a precipitous promontory.
The origin of this fortress possibly dates from King Edward's visit to the
town in 924, when the Old Borough (dealt with in Class B) may have
existed ; and he ' commanded a burh to be built on the south side of
the river, over against the other, and the bridge over the Trent, between the
two burhs.' 3 No evidence remains to show that this was done, or that
the promontory fortress supplied the royal demand, though it seems impossible
that so commanding a position could have been neglected by former
warriors.
The natural fastness, precipitous on the southern side and largely so
on the western, was strengthened artificially by a fosse and steep escarpment
over it which ran the whole length of the cliff edge. On the north and
east the lines are wholly artificial, but of enormous proportions, being hewn
out of the solid rock ; this entrenchment divided the promontory from the
main-land, which slopes downward to the site of the old entrenched town on
the east.
The plan consists of four courts, sub-divisions of the original prehistoric
enclosure, three of which from the time of William I to that of Edward I
were utilized for and absorbed by the royal castle ; the fourth remained an
open field to become the camping ground of Charles I in 1642, in the midst
of which, ' on a flat and round spot,' now obliterated, he erected his standard
1 Arch, ix, 200.
1 Anglo-Saxon Chron. A. 924. The site of the burh on south side may possibly be identified with
Micklesborough Hill
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
of war. It is an open question whether these sub-divisions date before or
after the Norman Conquest. Divested of their later masonry and viewed as
earthworks alone, which was undoubtedly their state in the first century after
the Conquest, they much resemble the mound and bailey type of the Normans,
under which heading (Class E) they will be further noted.
SCALE OF FEET
O IOO 2OO 300
NOTTINGHAM CASTLE AND PRECINCTS.
Beyond the north line of this original entrenchment was a large tumulus,
utilized by Colonel Hutchinson during the Civil War as a platform for a piece of
ordnance ; in its later history it was known as ' Derry Mount,' and at one time
was adopted as the site of a windmill. It was levelled in 178 1, when no fewer than
five interments were found in it, one of them being accompanied by a dagger.
292
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
The strength of this defence consisting of a double ditch may be
gathered from the record of the late James Shipman,1 F.G.S., who says that —
The more northerly of the ditches was much smaller and shallower than the other one, being
only 1 3 feet in width ; the dimensions of the larger ditch could not be accurately ascertained
as the excavations did not go far enough south . . . : but it could hardly have been less than
50 feet in width, and was about 20 feet in depth. The smaller ditch was semicircular in
shape and went down 16 feet below the surface of the sand rock. [In the filling-in of the
excavations] a few bones, apparently those of animals, were found ; among them was the back
part of a human skull, having probably come from some other part when the ground was
levelled in 1782 [possibly from the remains found in the 'Derry Mount'] . . . Between the
ditches was a narrow ridge of rock six feet in width. The northern side of the great ditch
was a vertical cliff of more than seven feet. The bottom of the great ditch appeared to rise
with the ground towards the west ; . . . the ditches followed a general east-to-west line, and
cut across the top of the hill.
A great line of fosse sweeping away to the north connected the castle
and the old town, enclosing the intervening valley of the new borough. The
west part appears to be the oldest, as it continued further north to the brow
of the hill overlooking the Larkdale valley, now the depression of Shakespeare
Street, where it played no part in recorded history. The date of this enclosing
line is unknown, but at one time it was partially strengthened by a stone
wall. In 1898, this northern fosse was cut through by the railway, and found
to be hewn out of the solid rock, over 30 ft. in width and 20 ft. in depth.
WORKSOP. — A prominent feature of this village is the Castle Hill, a
headland dominating an ancient road which appears to be a continuation of
the route from Stamford to Newark via Kelham and the Gorge Dyke at
Wellow. It is a hill
of red sandstone, from
which the ford de-
rives the name of
* Redford,' now called
Radford.
There is, appar-
ently, no evidence
that a mediaeval cas-
tle was ever built
here ; and although
Leland said ' the old
castle on the hill by
the town is clene
down, and scant
known where it was,'
he was probably mis-
led by the name
' Castle Hill,' and the
earthwork — such as
remains — is the work
of an earlier age,
undisturbed by any structure of stone.
The remains consist of a fosse, which cuts off the promontory, upon
which is a flat mound of somewhat circular plan.
1 Excavations at the Nott. Gen. Hospital, 7.
293
SCALE or rtET
.00 200
soo
CASTLE HILL, WORKSOP.
BLIDWORTH CAMP.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
HILL FORTRESSES
[CLASS B]
BLIDWORTH. — The Blidworth Camp is situated ij miles north-west of
Blidworth village and 3 miles
south-east of Mansfield, above
a little rivulet called the Rain-
worth Water, a tributary of the
River Maun.
Major Rooke, writing in
1788, says, 'The remains of
this camp is on a hill within
3 miles of Mansfield. On part
of the north and north-west
sides of the camp the ditch
and vallum appear perfect.'
From C to B, a length of 1 27 yds.
is a double vallum with an inter-
mediate fosse ; but from B
towards the south the entrench-
ments widen and branch into a
double vallum, each with its
fosse. From B the defences
curve to the south for 140 yds.,
where the ditches are obliterated, but the ramparts appear to have continued
up the rising ground. The vallum and fosse on the southern and eastern sides
have been destroyed,
owing to the hill
having been enclosed
and cultivated.
On the north
side the ground slopes
down to a morass
some 90 ft. wide,
through which runs
the Rai n w o r t h
Water.
Close to the
vallum on the north-
west are two tumuli
105 ft. apart.
EAST RETFORD.
— Castle Hill, on
the boundary of this
parish and that of
Grove, is 2 miles
east - south - east of
Retford and 6 miles
south of Gringley on
the Hill.
CASTLE HILL, EAST RETFORD.
294.
SCAtE OF FEET
IOO 2OO
300
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
Extensive earthworks are situated on this high ground, of which the
principal part only is seen on this plan. It consists of an irregular fortified
area which was apparently connected with another and larger entrenchment.
The rampart and fosse have suffered greatly from the levelling process.
From the north-west part the works extend westward as rampart and fosse
for half a mile ; for the first half of this distance the fosse is on the north side,
where the ground falls away. The other or western half is a vallum with
evidence of a second or inner one. South-east of these entrenchments are one
complete side and portions of two others of the larger camp, with an
entrance between the two ; but the destruction of the ancient work and the
construction of the more modern moat render it impossible to trace the
system of the pre-historic defences. Possibly this mutilation was occasioned
by the Parliamentarian war, when this neighbourhood was one of the scenes
of that lamentable contention.
Concerning these earthworks Laird remarked that : ' Being so near the
line of the Roman Road (Lincoln to York via Littleboro'), the situation
could not escape that warlike people as fit for an exploratory station, and we
may conclude that the moat on Castle Hill was occupied by them for military
purposes, though it may originally have been a British work.'
FARNSFIELD : HILL CLOSE CAMP. — To the
east of Hexgreve Park, and about three
quarters of a mile to the north-west of Kirk-
lington, a curious series of entrenchments crown
the summit of a hill.
William Dickinson furnishes an engraving
of the plan, and Major Rooke, in 1788,
describes the vallum and fosse as perfect in
places, but so destroyed by the plough in
other parts that the precise shape cannot be
made out.
The extremities of the outworks were de-
stroyed before 1818, but the remains exhibited
a central enclosure within a vallum, slightly
higher than the surrounding ground. In 1864
it was said that the vallum and fosse could HlLL CLOSE CAMP' F*"«""-D
be traced, but that the intermediate lines were
destroyed. Around this main camp appeared three other ramparted areas,
which, when perfect, were probably four in number, one at each of the
irregular sides ; but how the broad fosse between these apparently independent
works branched out and consolidated them into one great stronghold
is almost beyond conjecture.
Standing in a high position, Hill Close Camp overlooked the valley of
the Greet, along which an ancient road passed from the Trent, via Southwell,
to Mansfield and the west.
In 1849 Roman remains were found near this spot.
GRINGLEY ON THE HILL : BEACON HILL CAMP. — As the name implies,
this is an elevated site. It is situated in the north-east of the county, abutting
in old times on miles of bog-carr or swamp-land, separating the Isle of
Axholme, which lies to the north. From the Beacon Hill near the church
295
N
/ i
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
very extensive views of the country round are obtained, embracing a circle of
some sixty miles, whence the approach of an invader would be seen at a far
distance. It is a natural hill, fairly round in form, which rises 3 5 ft. above the
level of the road immediately at its foot ; in all it is 275 ft. above the sea-level.
The camp is on the north side of the hill and follows the natural con-
tour ; it is elongated in plan, the long axis being east and west, depending
largely for its strength on the escarpment of the
hill. Some distance from the summit, on the north
side, is an outer defence or terrace of more erratic
curves following the natural line of the hill, its
very irregularity enhancing its strategical importance.
The important question of a water-supply was
overcome in this instance by the rise of a small
tributary to the River Trent, which flows to the
east of the camp.
About ij miles to the south-west passes an
ancient road from Lincoln, via Littleborough, to
Doncaster, which is embraced in the Vlth and
VHIth Iters of Antoninus.
This site was occupied by Prince Rupert in 1644 when he routed the
Parliamentary army and succoured Newark Castle.
GROVE. — Part of the earthworks on Castle Hill is in this parish, but
the whole is treated of above under the parish of East Retford.
SCALE OF FCCT
IOO ZOO
300
BEACON HILL CAMP,
GRINGLEY ON THE HILL.
WINNY HILL CAMP, MANSFIELD WOODHOUSB.
MANSFIELD WOODHOUSE : WINNY HILL CAMP. — A small eminence to
the north-east of Mansfield Woodhouse and if miles north-north-west of
296
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
Mansfield is called Winny Hill, on and around which are the remains of
a camp. On the crown of the hill the camp follows the natural line, but on
the east side, C, the vallum appears to have gone up the hill, where a
hedge has been planted upon it, and on the south side, at D, it apparently
turned down by the side of a sunk road, which, at 300 ft. to the east,
terminates at a brook.
At the base of the hill on the north-west side is a double vallum and
double fosse extending about 160 yds. The inner vallum rises 4 ft.
from the foot of the hill and descends nearly 8 ft. into a fosse 6 ft.
wide at the bottom ; the second vallum, 1 2 ft. in thickness, is of the same
height as the first, and the outer fosse, slightly wider than the other, is
4 ft. deep.
Outside these entrenchments is the road A, the 'Leeming Lane' — the
'Leeming Street' of Mansfield — which appears to have been a branch of an
ancient street that divided the watershed of the rivers Maun and Leen by the
ridge of Robin Hood Hills and to have passed Mansfield on its way to
the ford of Retford for Littleborough and Lincoln. B is a road from Mans-
field to Clipston, Edwinstowe, and Ollerton, which now passes between the
foot of the hill and the entrenchments.
From the top of the hill a view is commanded of all the neighbouring
camps and roads, especially the great camp in Pleasley Park, county
Derby.
NOTTINGHAM, ST. MARY'S HILL. — The site of the old English borough
or town of Nottingham is, owing to being built over for many centuries, not
indicated on the Ordnance maps as a feature that can be scheduled under
class B. Nevertheless it is known to have been an important area defended
by fosse and vallum : the south line is a precipitous rock rising from
the meadow to the height of nearly 100 ft. Its western line is still the
boundary of two parishes, the old and new boroughs of Domesday. Those
of the north and east are preserved by existing inner and outer lines of
streets that bore, as records testify, descriptive names implying walls
(earthen) or defences.
The town was intersected by two ancient roads. Through its long axis,
east and west, ran the old trackway or ridgeway bordering the Trent valley,
and through its short axis — almost north and south — is the Stone Street,
Broad Street, or York Street of Nottingham, passing in its way north to
Bawtry, Saltersford, and the Coniswath (King's Ford). South of the town
this road takes a short rectangular bend, which is a sunken way in the rock,
by which to ascend from the meadow to the high level of the camp ; the
straight line of the road, from the precipitous character of the rock, being
impracticable.
A vallum and fosse surrounded the north, west, and east sides,
the clifF forming the southern defence, but all have for long been built
over ; rebuilding operations however occasionally expose the ancient fosse.
At the south-west corner, when cut through by the Great Central
Railway, it was found to be 1 6 ft. wide and 7 ft. deep, its section being nearly
semi-circular.
When the central part of the northern fosse was exposed a few years ago,
two small objects of solid earthenware were found, modelled on the lines of
i 297 38
N.
v«fe.%-
IW
iyil.
^w
"liM
CAMP AT OXTON.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Roman amphorae, which were identified by the late Sir Wollaston Franks, of
the British Museum, as hand-warmers.1
OXTON. — A well-planned camp remains in good preservation nearly
one mile north of Oxton village and south-east of Oxton Grange, locally
known as ' Oldox,' which is probably derived from Old Works ; this camp —
governed to a certain extent by the natural line of the hill — has a plan
something between an oval and a parallelo-
gram. It is surrounded by a double vallum
and single fosse, except on the east, where
there is a triple vallum and a double fosse,
and here its strength is greatly augmented
by the steep escarpment of the hill on the
south and east.
The entrance, at the south-east, is by a
sunk road which rises 200 ft. up the hill side.
At half that distance a path curves from it on
the right and continues in the outer fosse ;
but the main path continues to the inner
fosse, where it is confronted by an indentation
in the vallum, at which spot the invaders
would be thrown into confusion by an all-
round assault from the defenders. On the
eastern side, beneath the second rampart and the
outer ditch, is a berm or fairly wide platform,
which forms a coign of vantage over the sunk path entrance and provides
a thoroughfare to the northern part of the camp. At the north-east the
works are mutilated, but the middle agger and outer fosse, with the inter-
mediate berm, apparently merge into one broad ditch, from which an
entrance through the inner rampart gives access to the central area.
The engineering skill displayed in the construction of this earthwork is
of a high order, and well repays a careful study.
Three tumuli are in a westward line from this camp, the farthest not
being over a mile distant, and half a mile to the west is the rectangular camp
at Lovely Grange. ruargarto
THURGARTON. — In this parish, 3!
miles south-west from Southwell, is Castle
Hill, a slight eminence in the valley of
the Trent. It is quite close to the village,
from which a footpath leads to a small,
almost square, entrenchment 200 ft. by
1 60 ft. The footpath covers the site of
the north-west side. Within the enclosure
is a small mound.
WOODBOROUGH. — Five miles north-east from Nottingham and half a mile
south of Calverton is Fox Wood, in which is one of the most interesting
earthworks of the county. It is a matter of regret that destructive forces have
shorn it of its original size and plan. The swell of the ground gives a promi-
nence to the site.
1 Proc. Soc. Antiq. 28 Jan. 189*.
298
Hill f
CASTLE HILL, THURGARTON.
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
Mu'H* ''!>'"'" ""'O
I...!' 'Mltftfr;''/,
'Fox Wood
V.
SCALE OF FEET
too too
WOODBOROUGH CAMP
At present the remains are somewhat oval in form. The strongest
position, approaching a square, has three sides of a vallum and fosse ; but on
the eastern side they begin
to curve outwards into an-
other court, which possibly
provided a well-defended
entrance into this innermost
area. On the north is an-
other court with the fosse
remaining on the north and
west sides ; at the north-
east the defence changes
into a vallum which ap-
parently, by the progress
of its line, joined the
northern entrenchments of
the inner court ; but the
eastern side is lost.
From the middle of
the northern side a strong
vallum, embracing all the
inner works, passes around
the western and southern
sides, at the extremity of
which latter it is destroyed ;
this entrenchment is probably older than the interior works. At the middle-
north point is an entrance, difficult of access ; the agger is here incurved, while
another rampart, taking the same curve outwardly, forms a sunken approach,
which for iBoft. — even in its mutilated state — could be covered by a cross-
fire from both sides.
On the western side the intervening ground between the inner fosse
and outer vallum widens into a broad platform.
The position of this stronghold is the centre of many surrounding camps,
and communication could easily be made with those at Lambley on the south ;
Lowdham and Thurgarton on the east ; Epperstone and Oxton on the north ;
and the two in the parish of Arnold on the west.
RECTANGULAR CAMPS, ETC.
[CLASS C]
ARNOLD. — Nearly 2 miles north of Arnold, and 5 miles north of
Nottingham, is the site of a camp on Hollinwood Hill alias Cockpit Hill,
on a point 521 ft. above sea-level.
This camp dominates the ancient road from Nottingham to Bawtry
and the north, which passes this elevated site three-quarters of a mile to the
west. It is a point where the roads, or ridgeways, and three parishes meet,
viz., those of Arnold, Calverton, and Woodborough.
299
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Major Rooke thus speaks
of the camp : ' These works
appear to have continued east-
ward beyond the hedge into an
enclosed field, where there is
hardly any trace of the ditch ;
an old native remembered it
extending a long way in that
direction. It has had a double
ditch and vallum ; but the
plough has destroyed a great
part of it.' l
The portion then re-
maining showed a rectangular
plan 1,251 ft. long and 720 ft.
CASTLE HILL, CAR COLSTON
300
HILL, ARNOLD.
wide, its long axis
lying due north-
east by south-west.
Beyond the sur-
rounding vallum
and fosse, on the
south-east side, was
a platform and the
remains of an outer
vallum and fosse.
Two entrances
were visible, almost
opposite each other,
one in each of the
long sides. Near
the north-western
works, and presum-
ably about the cen-
tre of the original
length, was an en-
closure 5 1 ft. square.
Several Roman
coins have been
found here.
CAR COLSTON.
—On Castle Hill,
ij miles north of
Bingham, is a large
1 Arch, x, 378.
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
camp through which runs the great Fosse Way towards Newark ; this being
the boundary between two parishes, part of the camp is in Car Colston and
part in East Bridgford.
It is an irregular camp with a single vallum, depending to a slight extent
on the natural slope, which is steepest on the south and south-east, decreasing
as it proceeds northwards. On the north-west side of the Fosse Way the
northern defences are said to have been in two tiers, this being the most
accessible side for an enemy approaching from the direction of Newark.
The inner defence curved round the north and turned into the central area,
forming a defended entrance to the interior. The whole of the western
defence has been obliterated by the plough. Just beyond the fort to the west
is a spring of water.
Many Roman coins and fragments of pottery have been found within
the circumvallation, and it is generally supposed to have been the site of the
Roman station of Margidunum.
DARLTON : CAMP AT KINGSHAUGH. — Two and a half miles north-east
of Tuxford is a system of earthworks embracing an area of about 7 acres.
The northern boundary
is a small stream flowing
eastward towards the
River Trent, about three
miles distant.
The inner work is
a broad ditch which
originally appears to
have enclosed an ir-
regular circle, the extant
half being on the east.
On the same side is an
outer vallum and ditch,
the latter broadening
and again narrowing
towards the entrance,
the widest part con-
taining a mound for the
additional defence of
the narrow passage by
which access was gained
to the interior.
In mediaeval times these defences were adapted to the old Kingshaugh
House, which formed part of the manor of Dunham.
EAST BRIDGFORD. — Part of the camp mentioned under Car Colston is
in this parish.
EPPERSTONE. — In Epperstone Park, 6 miles north-east from Nottingham,
on ' Solly Hill,' Mr. Dickinson mentions the presence of a Roman camp
' very little obliterated.' l It is also noticed by Dr. Gale, who considered it
to be the Causennae of the Itinerary. A number of Roman coins were found
here in 1776.
1 Exploratory Observations, p. 17. .
301
6CALC OF FEET
O IOO 200 30O
KINGSHAUGH CAMP, DARLTON.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
HARWORTH. — In the extreme north-west of the county, at Martin, about
a mile north-north-west of Bawtry, where the ancient road provides the only
thoroughfare out of Nottinghamshire in the direction of Doncaster, is a square
camp with double vallum and fosse, which is thus described by Mr. W. Peck,
writing in 1815: * This camp is now covered with trees and underwood,
which have contributed to preserve it to the present time ; the ditches are
nearly grown up, though they evidently have been deep. This place most
probably was a station to defend the Roman road that passed near to it :
several smaller stations are adjoining ; but of late years the ditches have
been filled up. A little to the north-east are traces of a Roman pottery,
many broken vessels of various forms are now found, several pieces I have
seen are made of blue clay and slightly baked. At the time of the enclosure
of the adjoining parish of Austerfield several curious remains of arms were
found near the site of the great camp, such as parts of swords and heads
of battle-axes.' l
Francis White, writing in 1864, says : 'Here is the site of a Roman
station where, in 1828, three silver coins of Antonius, Adrianus, and
Faustina were found, together with part of a Roman vase, and numerous
pieces of Roman pottery. The form of the fort or station may still be
distinctly traced, and even when the field is covered with full-grown
wheat an octagon figure is slightly perceptible, from the stems being shorter
on the site of the building than in other places.' s We give this quotation
as a contribution to the state of the camp at that date ; but it is of
questionable assistance : the writer's conception of an earthwork was his
own, and the 'octagon figure' can only be explained by the two four-
sided ramparts. The outer vallum was 215 ft. on either side, with rounded
corners, and the inner defence, leaving a court 50 ft. wide between the
two entrenchments, had its two opposite angles at the north-west and
south-east considerably rounded.
HAWTON. — In this parish immediately south-west of Newark is ' Sconce
Hill,' the largest earthwork of the Civil War in the county. It was the
work of the royalist engineers and remains in a well-preserved condition.
This mound, called the ' Queen's Sconce,' is rectangular in form with
projecting bastions at the angles, capped with an earthen breastwork, the
centre being depressed. It is surrounded by a deep moat and artificially
escarped ground stretches away a considerable distance.
It formed the north-west end of the defensive earthworks that consti-
tuted a cincture round the town of Newark, the north-east termination
having a similar work on a smaller scale, of which some remains may
be seen. They each occupied the south-east or right bank of the river. A
view of the entire works is furnished in Dickinson's History of NeivarA. A
plan is given in the Guide to Newark by T. M. Blagg, F.S.A., who also refers
to a somewhat similar earthwork on the east bank of the river which was
raised by Cromwell's army.
KIRKBY IN ASHFIELD : CASTLE HILL CAMP. — This village lies 5^ miles
south-west from Mansfield ; and although the name would appear to demand
its classification under B, the natural features of the site do not justify so doing.
1 Tofog. Account of the Isle of Axholme, p. 6.
* Hiit. ett. of the County o/Notti. p. 680.
302
kirkby
in
Ash fie Id
N.
SCALE or recr
too *oo soo
CASTLE HILL CAMP, KIRKBY IN ASHFIELD.
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
The camp immediately south of the church is a small rectangular area
surrounded by a vallum, with the remains of a fosse on the southern side.
At the south-west angle the entrance is guarded by a projecting platform at
the extremity of the western agger, which counterbalances the rampart and
ditch on the other side of the
entry. Another entrance is at
the north-west angle, between
two ramparts ; and within the
area is an agger 60 ft. long lying
parallel to the east boundary.
Due east of this camp,
220 ft. distant, are the remains
of a work, pear-shaped in plan,
consisting of a vallum which
possibly joined the south-east
angle of the camp.
LITTLEBOROUGH. — Traces
of a fosse are perceptible, in-
dicating probably part of the
original defences of this Roman
station of Segclocum.
NEWARK. — In the valley of the Trent, on the Fosse Way from Leicester
to Lincoln, was a strong military post to control both land and water communi-
cation. That it was a very ancient stronghold is seen in the Roman remains
discovered.
OXTON : CAMP AT LONELY GRANGE. — About half a mile east of the Oxton
camp called Oldox is a field named ' Lonely Grange,' in which, situated on
the side of a hill within 200 yds. of the top, was an elongated rectangular camp.
In 1790 Major Rooke 1 de-
scribed the rampart and fosse on the
north-east and north-west sides as
plainly distinguished ; but with very
y,,t slight traces on the other two sides.
'''%•', * The length of the long axis was
'&. 942 ft., the short one 201 ft. Its
f ''%>. high position provided an extensive
'**$//,,, view, whence signals could be seen
from other camps.
The site of this camp may
now be recognized as ' Grangefield
Farm,' \\ miles north-east from
^ Oxton and 3^ miles west of
Southwell.
1 1 •
SCAFTWORTH. — Until recently
an earthwork similar to that at
Martin, in the parish of Harworth,
was situated about half a mile to
the east of Bawtry ; it is figured in some of the old county maps.8
1 Arch, r, 349. ' County Map in Pigot's Directory, 1841. W. Peck, A Topographical History of Bawtry.
3°3
CAMP AT LONELY GRANGE, OXTON.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
During the enclosure of the common several specimens of Roman
antiquities were found. This discovery seems to confirm the opinion that the
vestiges of some fortifica-
tions near the village are
the remains of a Roman
fort or station, through
which passed the Roman
road between Doncaster
and Littleborough.1
SOUTHWELL : CAMP
ON BURGAGE HILL. — On a
hill to the north-east of
the River Greet and north
of the town of Southwell
was an oval camp, the plan
of which is figured in
Dickinson's History of
Southwell, published in
1 80 1. The site was then
largely built upon and in
$» part enclosed. It is a
f7
ft
>,-2J
*'%
tl
£?/
^
CAMP ON BURGAGB HILL, SOUTHWELL.
matter for regret that, as
in the parallel case of the
Hexgreve Camp, he gave
no measurements.
The site was inter-
sected by two roads, A, the
route to Hockerton on the
north and a minor branch connecting it with another road in the bottom of
the fosse. At B the fosse has been utilized as a public road, which mutilated
the line of
SCALE or rccr
M <t '9° *.°o a?o
SECTION
en-
trenchments at this
point. The narrow
or south end of the
oval was also de-
stroyed by the mak-
ing of a sewer,
obliterating all in-
dications of the
entrance, which was
probably at this
spot.
WELLOW: JORDAN
CASTLE. — One mile
and a half south-
east by east of Oiler-
ton and half a mile north-east of the village of Wellow, the ground rises to a
comparative height above the surrounding country. On this swelling emi-
1 F. White, Hilt. ttc. of Nottinghamshire, p. 397.
3°4
A. Fosse here nearly
filled nirh earth
in 1900. .j
rarm House
JORDAN CASTLR, WELLOW. and
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
nence is a circular earthwork about 250 ft. in diameter, a broad fosse which
opens on the south-west side to the surrounding land where vestiges of
further works are seen. These may have been a continuation of the camp
or a defended approach to the small fortification, for there is no doubt the
entrance was at this point.
CASTLE MOUNTS
[CLASS D]
BOTHAMSALL. — Fully 4 miles north-west of Tuxford on the north bank of
the River Meden is a conical mound called 'Castle Hill,' but the fosse is
obliterated and the general contour of it has not been so well preserved as the
mounts at Egmanton and Laxton.
LAMBLEY. — Five miles north-east from Nottingham and i\ miles from
Lowdham on the Cocker Beck is a simple mound known as the 'Round Hill.'
LOWDHAM. — Six miles north-east of Nottingham above Cocker Beck is a
well-defined circular mount and fosse, situated on the west side of the existing
old manor house and a short distance from the church. It is only small
in size, and the encircling fosse is nearly levelled up ; but its situation in the
meadow implies that it was formerly greatly strengthened by surrounding
waters.
&CALK OF f IIT
,2 Cast If Hill
\
CASTLE MOUNTS WITH ATTACHED COURTS
[CLASS E]
ANNESLEY. — In Annesley Park, 2£ miles from Hucknall Torkard, on
rising ground towards the western boundary of
the county, is Castle Hill. It is a simple form
of the mount and bailey type, largely depending
on the natural formation of the ground for its
defence. The court is on the north of the mound,
but irregularly approaching its base at the north-
west, guided thus by the natural escarpment
of the hill. A fragment of the fosse remains at
the north-east angle of the court, and a trans-
verse agger 120 ft. in length extends across a
third of the middle of the court on the western
side.
ASLOCKTON or ASLACTON. — The works
here considered are in the village of Aslockton,
which lies 10 miles east of Nottingham and 2 miles beyond Bingham on the
left bank of the River Smite.
The mount, about 16 ft. high, originally circular, but lately excavated for
ballast on its south-east, is marked as a tumulus on the early ordnance maps,
but on the later as ' Cranmer's Mound.' The latter is accounted for by
this town being the ancestral home and birthplace of Thomas Cranmer,
i 3°5 39
X\
•. *x>
.•>
-S
Park
ftnneiley ^'
CASTLE HILL, ANNESLEY.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
archbishop of Canterbury, but the
and are probably the remains of a
SCALE OF FEET
IOO 20O 30O
SKETCH SECTION
earthworks date from an earlier period
late Norman stronghold.
Two rectangular
courts on the south-east
are slightly raised and
appear to be surrounded
by fosses, in a large
measure filled up. The
moat proper to the
mount is still well sup-
plied with water on the
south and west.
EGMANTON. — Near
the Great North Road
i J miles south of Tux-
ford stood one of the
best examples of the
mount and bailey type
of defences in the
EARTHWORKS AT ASLOCKTON.
county, still striking attention by the altitude of the mount.
This artificial mount, called ' Gaddick Hill,' is 460 ft. in circumference
at the base and 198 ft.
at the top, with an
escarpment of 50 ft.
slope at its highest ;
but it has been
mutilated by the
local games upon it
on every recurring
Shrove Tuesday.
The terrace on the
south-east of the
summit may be the
result of modern
vandalism, but is
more likely an
original feature, pro-
viding a landing
place for the draw-
ladder by which the
keep was approached.
In the construction of the farm house and yard a large portion of the
vallum and fosse of the bailey has been destroyed. This was provided with
an entrance in the middle of the arc, and from the extant fragments it appears
to have been of some strength.
LAXTON, formerly Lexington. — Half a mile north of Laxton and 2 \ miles
south-west of Tuxford is the largest and best preserved work of this class in
the county ; it is situated fully a mile south-west of the last-mentioned
fortification in Egmanton, and stands on higher ground than its neighbour.
306
Church
\\ farm Buildings
\ i <
SCALEOFFEET'109
IOO too 300
GADDICC HILL, EGMANTON.
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
The great mount, with its fosse nearly perfect, has a stage or terrace on
its upper part ; the cap surmounting it appears like a tumulus on the mound
proper. At the base it is 816 ft. in circumference, and 426 ft. at the top of
an escarpment of
71 ft. ; this is sur-
mounted by a ditch •^'•'•Vvlll '/''/ ''''*'••
and ring of earth --/S\^ '%'-:'-• \\
and the small
mount, which latter
is 147 ft. in cir-
cumference at the
base and 8 ft. per- // ||%| SCALE OF FEET
pendicular height. \~^ II % ° '°° *°° 30°
The fosse around
the great mount
branches off on the
east into a sunk road
passing into the
bailey, and on the
same side a pro-
jecting platform = =
protects this June- ^&
tion ; on the west H :
side also is a frag- \\
ment of a similar §|
defence. ^^
On the south
access to the mount
Was gained from LAXTON CASTLB.
the inner court,
which occupies this side, and is rectangular with an exceedingly strong vallum
and fosse on the south, the rampart being strengthened by rough stone
walling. At either end of this defence was an entrance ; that on the east into
an outer court, that on the west to the exterior of the fortress ; the latter,
needing greater protection, has the western fosse around a circular platform,
by which the approach is well covered. The works on the east of the court
have been mutilated, but appear to have been arranged to command the
entrance to the sunk road into the fosse and the entrances to the bailey.
The outer and larger court encloses a considerable area. The vallum and
fosse are fairly perfect on the eastern side ; on the west the vallum has been
levelled and the fosse partly choked with earth ; evidence of an oblique
entrance is at the middle of this side defended by overlapping entrenchments.
On the south portions of the rampart remain, but the works were originally far
more extensive on this side ; a paved causeway leads to an ancient well, and
yet further south a small circular mount and ditch may be traced. On the
high land a few yards east of these works is a small circular mount ; it is well
defined and girt round with a shallow ditch.
On the north of these ancient defences the ground falls rapidly, the
mount standing on the brow of the hill.
3°7
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
NOTTINGHAM. — The castle of Nottingham has been included in Class A
on account of its natural position and the deep fosse which cuts off a
rocky promontory, otherwise it would have been recorded in this section,
as in mediaeval days its main features were those of a mount and bailey
stronghold.
HOMESTEAD MOATS
[CLASS F]
These earthworks occur in considerable numbers throughout the length
and breadth of the county. In nearly every case they appear to be rect-
angular in form, and composed of raised areas with a fosse or ditch
strengthened by water. They appear to mark the original sites of the lords'
residences in their agricultural centres.
In some instances, as at Hodsock, etc., they are still occupied, the moats
being spanned by bridges and defended by gate-houses ; in others, as at
Wiverton and Colwick, they were abandoned centuries ago, and the manor
houses or halls rebuilt on the open land adjoining.
In other instances, as at Clifton near Nottingham, and Holme Pierrepont,
the line of the earthworks has been destroyed, the manor houses or halls and
the adjacent churches remaining as their record ; or, as at Whatton, Norwell,
and Weston, they remain as landmarks in the grass fields adjoining the
churches. They constitute a subject upon which careful study would meet
with ample reward.
At Stanton on the Wolds, situate in an ancient territory called Seggeswold,
from which Sixhills, of old Seggeshill, in the neighbouring county of Leicester,
drew its name, the area enclosed is about four acres. An enclosure at Gams-
ton, on the right bank of the River Idle, is equally large. An enclosure
suggestive of ancient origin occurs at Wilford, near Nottingham, in which the
village itself is situate, the centre of its river bank being the site of the
ancient ford, opposite to which on the Nottingham side a pre-historic
dwelling site or settlement was found when sinking the shaft of the Clifton
Colliery.
A fine enclosure occurs on the right bank of the River Ryton at Scrooby,
in which the old archbishops of York had one of their Nottingham palaces.1
Leland describes it as ' The great manor place standing within a moat, longing
to the archbishops of York.' It had a bridge and a gate-house, and was
walled round in the middle ages. The fosse is silted up, and the rough area
is a pasture field containing a farmstead.
At Rolleston, near Southwell, are extensive moated areas, occupied down
to the seventeenth century by the Neville family, now a pasture field near the
church.
At Sibthorpe, near the Fosse Way, there is a considerable area enclosed
by a moat, now forming a swampy depression. At Coddington, two miles
east of Newark, in a slight depression on the Beacon Hill, is a well-preserved
moated site ; two of its four sides are somewhat elongated.
At Granby, or Sutton, hard by, in the vale of Belvoir, a great manor
temp, Edward the Confessor, a moated site remains, the interior of which is
1 Bygone Notts, p. 248.
308
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
uneven in its surface, two of the four corners being raised into small mounds,
one of which until lately was occupied by a windmill ; this was the caput
or chief residence of the Norman d'Eyncourts.
At Norwell Woodhouse and at Belle Vue Park near Kirklington, and
about a mile west of Egmanton church and mound, are moated sites occupied
by farmsteads.
The Fosse Way in passing through the county forms with slight exception
a clear manorial line ; the village sites, a number of them with their moated
manors, are set back as agricultural centres from the road, on an average
of a mile or more, clearly with the view of cultivation being conducted
round them.
AVERH AM. — Two miles west of Newark, on the west of St. Michael's church.
BECKINGHAM. — On the eastern boundary of the county and the west of
the River Trent, west of Gainsborough, is a moat surrounding an area called
« Dog Island.'
BILSTHORPE. — Five miles north-west from Southwell.
BURTON JOYCE. — Five miles north-east by east from Nottingham, on the
north bank of the Trent, is the Eertune of the Domesday Survey. In the time
of Henry II it belonged to the family of Joez, from whom it derived the
adjunct to its name. A moat remains at Burton Lodge.
CAR COLSTON. — Nine miles south-west by south from Newark the re-
mains of a moat lie to the south-east of Car Colston Manor House,
CARLTON ON TRENT. — Six and three-quarter miles north from Newark.
A moat lies f of a mile south-west of the village.
CAUNTON. — Five and a half miles north-west by north from Newark.
A moat is on Earlshaw Hall Farm, south-west of the village.
CLIFTON. — Four and a half miles south-west from Nottingham ; now
destroyed.
CODDINGTON. — Two and a quarter miles east by north from Newark,
and north of Coddington Windmill, is a moat with two of its sides elongated.
COLWICK. — Two and a half miles east of Nottingham.
CUCKNEY or NoRTON-CucKNEY. — Five and a half miles south-south-west
from Worksop.
DARLTON. — Three and a quarter miles north-east by east from Tuxford
is a moat on the site of Kingshaugh Hall.
GAMSTON. — South of East Retford, on the River Idle ; area enclosed is
about 4 acres.
GONALSTON. — Four and three-quarter miles south-south-west from
Southwell.
GOTHAM. — Seven and a half miles south-south-west from Nottingham.
' Rushcliffe Moat ' Water House, to the north of Crow Wood Hill, near the
boundary of the parishes of Gotham and West Leake.
GRANBY. — Four miles south-east from Bingham is the moated site of a
manor of the time of Edward the Confessor. At two of the angles are mounds.
GREASLEY. — Seven miles north-west from Nottingham. Beauvale Priory
to the west of Callis Hagg.
HODSOCK. — Two miles south-west from Blyth. The site is still occupied.
HOLME PIERREPONT. — South-east of Nottingham. The moat is now
destroyed.
309
\- ->
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
KINOULTON. — Nine miles south-east from Nottingham. A moat is near
the boundary of this parish and that of Hickling, to the south-west of Kemps
Spinney. The Fosse Way forms the western boundary of the parish.
KIRKLINGTON. — Three and a half miles north-west from Southwell.
The site is occupied by a farmstead.
LINDHURST. — Three miles south-east from Mansfield is a moat to the
west of Friar Tuck's Well, where Rainworth Water divides Mansfield and
Lindhurst parishes.
LOWDHAM. — Seven and three-quarter miles north-east from Nottingham
is an old manor house — now a farm — where the defences of an earlier fortified
house may be traced.
NORWELL. — Six miles north by west from Newark. One moat is to the
south-east of the village, near the Hall and St. Lawrence's church ; and
another close to the Black Horse Inn.
NORWELL WOODHOUSE. — Seven miles north-north-west from Newark.
A moat is to the south of the township.
OWTHORPE. — Eight and a half miles south-east by east from Notting-
ham, at Nanney's Plantation. The Fosse Way bounds the parish on the west.
ROLLESTON. — Two and a half miles south-east from Southwell are a moat
and fragments of earthworks.
SCROOBY. — One and three quarter miles south of Bawtry. On the right
bank of the Ry-
ton is the site
of an archie-
piscopal manor
of the prelates
of York.
SlBTHORPE.
— Nearly 7
miles south-
south-west from
Newark. A
moat 620 ft.
long runs in a
line north to
south on the
east side of the
manor house,
with a branch
at right angles
1 60 ft. in length.
A number of
small dykes are
in the neigh-
bourhood of the
Dovecote south-
east of the church. To the south-east of the park two quadrangular areas
about 1 20 ft. square are surrounded by a moat, which extends to the north,
and appears to have originally surrounded a third and larger area.
310
SlBTHORPE.
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
STANTON ON THE WOLDS. — Seven and a half miles south-east from
Nottingham. The moat encloses 4 acres.
STRELLEY. — Four and a half miles west-north-west from Nottingham.
In the park of Strelley Hall is an extensive area surrounded by a moat.
WEST LEAKE. — Three miles east from Kegworth, to the south and east
of Pithouse Lane.
WESTON. — Three miles south-east from Tuxford. A moat is in the
Hall Yard.
WHATTON. — Two and three-quarter miles east from Bingham. A moat
is to the west of the village, just above Whatton Bridge.
WIVERTON HALL. — Two miles south of Bingham. The moat of
Wiverton Hall is on the west side of the River Smite, and south-east of
Wiverton Farm.
WORKSOP. — Two miles north of Worksop is the moat of Gateford Hall.
MANORIAL STRONGHOLD
[CLASS G]
GREASLEY. — Seven miles north-west from Nottingham are the ruins of
Greasley Castle, built amid earthen defences. A length of vallum on the
A. Modern House
B. Castle Walls
C. Banks cut through
^.Traces of former Watercourse
GREASLEY CASTLE.
3"
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
south of the building, a fosse at right angles, and two other ramparts appar-
ently formed the boundaries of two courts. South-west of the castle is a long
length of rampart ; at the west end it returns north for a distance of 300 ft.,
and at its eastern extremity is a similar return, the angle thus formed is
moated and contains a series of parallel hollows. This was no doubt the
manorial fish stew, and though high and dry on the sloping hill-side there is
evidence that water once flowed from this spring-fed stew-pond. The
rampart of earth south-east is high enough to have held back the water to
fill the four stews, though the base of them is 5 ft. higher than that of
the moat.
UNCLASSIFIED EARTHWORKS
[CLASS X]
ANNESLEY. — Fragments of earthworks remain on the west and south-west
of Annesley Hall, near the Derby and Mansfield road.
ARNOLD. — Indications of entrenchments are visible to the north-east of
the village. They run north and south, between Killisick Lane and Spout
Lane.
BARTON IN FABIS. — Brent's, or Brand's Hill, 4 miles south-west of
Nottingham, is above a small tributary of the Trent, and about half a mile
south of the latter. Upon the side of this hill are certain lines of entrench-
ments, of which Camden says : ' On the side of the hill there appeared to be
terraces like waves, or ploughed lands, one above another, in number fourteen
or fifteen, and about a mile long. The works cross from the bottom
of the hill.'
These lines of entrenchment run north-east and south-west in an almost
straight line, curving slightly with the hill on the south-western extremity.
Seven lines only are now well defined, the lowest extending barely half the
whole distance, and the uppermost has been destroyed with the exception of
550 ft. They are possibly examples of prehistoric terrace ploughing.
BESTWOOD PARK. — Remains of some earthworks are observable to the
south of Bestwood Park, ij miles north-west of Arnold.
BLYTH. — An entrenchment is on the west side of Toad Holes Wood,
not quite a mile to the north-west of the village.
CAR COLSTON. — The remains of an entrenchment lie to the south-east of
Car Colston Manor House.
EGMANTON. — To the north of the great works at Laxton, in the valley
beneath the mount and bailey, is a quadrangular moat and -portion of an
outer fosse, surrounding three depressions, which it has been suggested were
for water storage or fish ponds, possibly of mediaeval date.
EVERTON. — Three miles south-east from Bawtry are some vestiges of
fortifications which have been supposed to be Roman from their proximity
to the ancient road and the discovery of some Roman coins.
GAMSTON. — Four miles north of Tuxford are indications of some earth-
works to the south-west of the rectory.
HARWORTH. — A so-called ' Roman bank ' forms the. east boundary of
Serlby Park.
313
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
KNEETON. — The remains of an entrenchment lie to the west of the
village. The Fosse Way also passes the south-east boundary of the parish.
LAXTON. — On the common are a series of mounds of low elevation, rising
from two to two and a half feet from shallow ditches. They form a group of
five, with indications of extending further towards the west ; while a similar
bank occurs at a considerable distance to the south-east. Tradition is silent
respecting these mounds, and so far no satisfactory explanation has been
forthcoming.
LOWDHAM. — Fragments of works remain to the west of the village.
MARNHAM. — Indications of earthworks, probably flood banks, lie around
Low Marnham.
MISSON. — Remains of earthworks are on the east side of the village.
MISTERTON. — Bykersdyke. In the extreme north-east of the county is
an ancient dyke, rampart, or waterway, which, for over four miles, constitutes
the boundary between Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire. Its object was to
connect the River Trent with the Idle, which at this point was only about
four miles distant to the west, and to make the site of Bawtry, on the Roman
road from Lincoln to York, an inland port ; and as such it continued
throughout the middle ages, and with varying fortunes until the introduction
of railways.
This dyke is alluded to in the Domesday Survey, and mentioned in a
charter of John, earl of Mortain, about the year iiSg.1 At some date
before the publication of Saxton's map in 1580 the dyke was duplicated
through higher ground about a mile further south, and designated the 'New
Bykersdyke.' The ancient dyke was straightened, and the county boundary
modified by the draining operations of Cornelius Vermuiden, under a patent
of Charles I, since which time it has lost its identity, and is replaced in its
west part by the comparatively modern ' Tindale bank,' while at its eastern
end the name has been altered to 'Heckdyke' or 'Hocdyke.'
NOTTINGHAM. — Connecting the camp of the Old Borough of Notting-
ham on the east and Nottingham Castle on the west, a strong vallum and
fosse enclosed the intervening ground — the New Borough of Domesday — on
its northern boundary, a distance of 1,690 ft. The eastern end was supported
by the entrenchments at the north-east corner of the old town, and making
a huge arc was supported on the west by the cliff at the northern extremity
of the prehistoric enclosure.
When the Great Central Railway track was made across this site in
1898 the fosse was found to have been hewn out of the solid rock ; it was
over 30 ft. in width and 20 ft. in depth.
RANSKILL. — A strong rampart and ditch, which is also in the parish of
Scrooby, and described under that name.
SCROOBY. — Between Blyth and Scrooby, in the north of the county,
some three miles north of East Retford, is an important rampart and fosse,
trending nearly south to north. It is nearly one and a half miles in length,
and the fosse is used as a sunken road between the above villages. Its bank
on the west side is enclosed in Serlby Park, to which it forms the manor
boundary ; the east side is fairly evenly divided between the parishes of
Scrooby and Ranskill ; the lands in the latter parish belonged to the Saxon
1 Records of the Borough of Nottingham, vol. i.
i 3J3 40
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
archbishops of York. The vallum is locally called ' The Roman Bank,' and
the fosse ' Roman Bank Lane ' and ' Long Bank Lane.'
Its origin is unknown, though possibly it is referred to in the following :
'Matilda de Mules, 10 Ric. I, ought one mark for licence to make a ditch
between the wood of Serleby and the fields.' l
SOUTH CLIFTON. — Indications of earthworks lie to the west and south-
west of the village.
SOUTH MUSKHAM. — At Little Carlton, two miles north from Newark,
and on the north side of the Trent, are the remains of an earthwork called
' The Mount ' ; it is described as ' an ancient place in the form of a cross,
shaded by some ancient sycamore, mulberry, and walnut trees.' *
WELLOW. — Gorge Dyke, possibly the eastern rampart and fosse of a
rectangular village enclosure.
WISETON. — Drakeholes lie to the north-west of Wiseton, where the
road from Bawtry to Gainsborough meets the Chesterfield Canal.
BARROWS AND TUMULI
ASLOCKTON. — A tumulus is figured in the Ordnance map near Bingham,
but it has the appearance of a military mound. Another mound has been
destroyed here.
BLIDWORTH. — Several tumuli are in the neighbourhood. Two of them
on the brow of a hill measure respectively 728 ft. and 159 ft. in circum-
ference. The latter was explored by Major Rooke, who describes it as
53 ft. in diameter, containing an urn made of iron filled with calcined bones
and ashes ; also a large sword in a wooden scabbard broken in several pieces,
two daggers, and fifteen glass beads — blue, yellow, and green.
Two other tumuli are situated on the side of Blidworth Camp, both of
which were opened by Major Rooke, who thus describes them: 'Close to
the vallum are two tumuli, thirty-five yards asunder. The diameter of the
most northern one was near eight yards, the more southern one being only
seven yards. These two I opened to the depth of near six feet from the
top and about one foot and a half from the level of the natural soil. Here
I perceived a thin body of smooth clay near 9 ft. 5 in. in length and 2 ft. 4 in.
in breadth ; on this lay ashes and burnt bones. On the edge of these clay
beds the ashes were very black, owing, I imagine, to their not having been
mixed with the burnt bones. At the end of one of these beds I found three
teeth. There were no urns in these tumuli.'
BLYTH. — In this parish are two tumuli ; one of them stands a con-
spicuous object by the roadside two miles south-east of the village, from
which point the ancient road from Nottingham to Bawtry and the north
makes a detour westward. It was formerly known as 'Emmeslaw,' and was
the site of the manor gallows, but is now called 'Blyth Law Hill.'
The other is in the middle of the highway in Blyth, the road dividing
at its base. It is a well-defined mound of easy gradient, upon which a
fourteenth-century building is placed. It is certainly an unrecorded cemetery,
and evidence of very early interments have been found in delving below
the surface.
1 Thoroton, Hist. e/Nettt. 475. ' Ibid. 488.
ANCIENT EARTHWORKS
BOTHAMSALL. — Five miles south-south-west from Retford and one mile
and a quarter east of the ancient road is Castle Hill, which is called a tumulus
on the Ordnance map.
GOTHAM. — At ' Court Hill,' a central spot on high land, is a well-defined
tumulus called the Cuckoo Bush, surrounded by a shallow ditch.
HAYWOOD OAK. — A large tumulus lies a quarter of a mile east of the
village on the brow of a hill.
NOTTINGHAM. — 'Deny Mount,' outside the northern fosse of the castle,
where the General Hospital now stands, was levelled in 1777, when five
skeletons and a dagger were found. Throsby mentions three or four barrows,
in one of which a quantity of human bones were found at Nottingham Hill,
about a mile from Nottingham.1
OXTON. — On the west side of the camp at Oxton is a tumulus thus
noticed by Major Rooke : ' About one hundred yards west of this camp a
hill rises in a conical shape ; the top appears to be a large tumulus, from
whence there is a very extensive view over the forest towards Mansfield.'
RANSKILL. — East of the village, extending to the River Idle, are several
barrows, also a tumulus called 'Blakow Hill.'
SOUTH COLLINGHAM. — ' Potter's Hill,' at a point where the Fosse Way
leaves the county for Lincoln city, is said to be a tumulus ; it was probably
connected with the Roman station of Crococalana.
WILLOUGHBY ON THE WOLDS. — A tumulus called 'Crossbill,' by Stukeley,
is close to the Red Cow Farm, to the east of the village.
The following is a list of parishes in which earthworks exist, with the
class to which they belong : —
Classes
Annesley EX
Arnold C X
Aslockton £
Averham F
Barton in Fabis X
Beckingham F
Bestwood Park X
Bilsthorpe F
Blidworth B
Blyth X
Bothamsall D
Bridgford, East, see East Bridgford
Burton Joyce F
Car Colston C F X
Carlton on Trent F
Caunton F
Clifton F
Coddington F
Colwick F
Cuckney F
Darlton C F
East Bridgford C
East Retford B
Egmanton E
Epperstone C
Everton X
Farnsfield . A B
Classes
Gamston F X
Gonalston F
Gotham F
Granby F
Greasley F G
Gringley on the Hill B
Grove B
Harworth C X
Hawton C
Hodsock F
Holme Pierrepont F
Kinoulton F
Kirby in Ashfield C
Kirklington F
Kneeton X
Lambley D
Laxton EX
Leake, West, see West Leake
Lindhurst F
Littleborough C
Lowdham DFX
Mansfield Woodhouse B
Marnham X
Misson X
Misterton X
Muskham, South, see South Muskham
Newark C
Throsby, Hist, of Notts. (1795), 16.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Classes
Norwell F
Norwell Woodhouse F
Nottingham ABEX
Owthorpe F
Oxton B C
Ranskill X
Retford, East, see East Retford
Rolleston F
Scaftworth C
Scrooby F X
Sibthorpe F
South Clifton X
South Muskham . X
Classes
Southwell C
Stanton on the Wolds F
Strelley F
Thurgarton B
Wellow C X
West Leake .
Weston
Whatton . .
Wiseton
Wiverton Hall
F
F
F
X
F
Woodborough B
Worksop A F
POLITICAL HISTORY
IN the making of the counties of England, as part of the making of
England itself, the effect of geographical and physical conditions
can hardly be overestimated. On these depended the lines of the
Roman roads marking the way for Saxon settlements, the grouping of
the Saxon kingdoms, and the grouping of the counties within the kingdoms.
The district which was to become Nottinghamshire, being traversed by the
Trent, invited Roman and Saxon along its waterway as a passage north and
south. As a further development this passage had to be guarded, and
round a fortified centre the county originated. The reasons which thus
brought the county into existence gave it in later days its strategical impor-
tance, brought it actively into every insurrectionary movement of Scotland
and the north of England, and made it of so much moment in the history of
the Civil War.
There is little or no definite evidence to mark the progress of the Angle
tribes who by the end of the sixth century had settled in the country round
the Trent. At their coming the Trent valley, in spite of Roman roads and
settlements,1 was undoubtedly a wild tract of unreclaimed country hedged
round by hills and stretches of forest. It was only along the Fosse road that
they could slowly push on to the Trent and gradually people the territory
which was to become Nottinghamshire, on their way to further conquests
under the name of Middle English in Leicestershire and further west. Hence
when, by a gradual series of annexations, the kingdom of Mercia had come
into being by the end of the sixth century 2 Nottinghamshire evidently
existed as a territorial district until the break-up of Mercia into shires under
Edward the Elder in the ninth century.3 However, the earliest mention of
the county is not until 1016, when, during the final struggle between Cnut
and Edmund Ironside, Cnut marched north and harried Nottinghamshire.4
No further mention of the county comes until 1064 or 1065, when
Earl Morkere, whom the thanes of Yorkshire and Northumberland had chosen
to be their earl after they had renounced and outlawed Earl Tostig, went
south to meet his brother Edwin with all the shire (i.e. Yorkshire), and with
Nottinghamshire, and Derbyshire, and Lincolnshire until he came to North-
amptonshire.6 The first definite outline of the bounds of the county and of
the wapentakes composing it, comes, of course, in the Domesday Survey, and
1 See section on ' Roman Remains,' for full account of the Roman occupation of the district.
1 Hen. of Hunt. Hist. Angl. (Rolls Ser.), 53. The original kingdom of Mercia evidently comprised
quite a small part of the later kingdom. Probably it included only the greater part of Staffordshire,
Derbyshire, and Nottinghamshire, with parts of Warwickshire and Leicestershire. See Chadwick, Studies
in Angl.-Sax. Institutions, 215.
3 Stubbs, Const. Hi;t. \, 104-11.
4 The spurious charter purporting to be made by King Wulfhere of Mercia in 664 granting Colingham
' in Notinghamscira ' to the monastery of Peterborough is of necessity no proof that the shire existed so early.
Rather the mention of the shire at that date is further evidence of the spuriousness of the charter. Kemble,
Cod. Dipl. v, 4-8.
4 Angl.-Sax. Chrm. (Rolls Ser.), i, 331.
317
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
from that time, at least, possibly from the time of Edward the Elder, the general
outline of the county has altered very little, and the wapentakes l have remained
almost the same on their outer lines. They were then eight in number,
Bassetlaw, Broxtow, Bingham, Thurgarton, Newark, Rushcliffe, ' Wardebec '
or ' Oswardebec ' (now with Rampton and Treswell forming the North Clay
division of Bassetlaw) and ' Lide ' (now the north division of Thurgarton).
The numbers remained the same until the seventeenth century, when
John Speed, writing in about 1610, stated that 'for the taxe to the crown'
Nottinghamshire was divided into eight wapentakes or hundreds.8 By 1719"
however the number had dwindled to the present number, six, since Bassetlaw
had absorbed the wapentake of Oswardebec, and Thurgarton that of Lide.
Bassetlaw, on account of its size, is now divided into North Clay, South Clay,
and Hatfield.
It is inevitable that the early history and political importance of the
county of Nottingham, as of so many others, must be gathered rather from
the history of its chief town than from any direct evidence concerning the
county in general. Evidently by the ninth century, if not before, the town
of Nottingham had become of importance strategically. Although Roman
soldiers had pushed their way along the banks of the Trent from Newark to
the site of Nottingham, they came there either too late or too few in
numbers to have left any lasting trace of their visit. Yet they had prepared
the way for the Angle to find and utilize the natural fortification presented
by the hill on which the castle of Nottingham was built in later days.
During the eighth century, in the struggle for supremacy between the three
great kingdoms, Nottingham must have often played a very important part for
Mercia, since from its situation it formed both a point of contact with and a
bulwark against the northern enemy. Again, at the end of the century, when
under the consolidating rule of Offa Mercia was supreme, though her
supremacy was unclaimed, the development of the town must have kept pace
with the development of the kingdom. Hence it was that when the
Danes under Hubba had struck at York and had defeated the two rival
claimants of the Northumbrian crown, they turned in 868 to Nottingham
and settled there for the winter in preparation for an attack on Mercia.
Once there they could defy the united forces of Burhred of Mercia and
Ethelred of Wessex,* and, although Mercia was probably saved from
devastation by the refusal of the Danes to fight, it remained submissive under
the terms of the forced peace. With Mercia submissive to the Northmen,
Nottingham under the Peace of Wedmore became one of the chief centres
of the Danish settlement in England, and one of the five boroughs. The
reduction of the Danelaw and the regaining of the five boroughs was the work
of Edward the Elder and his sister Ethelflaed, lady of the Mercians, and the
conquest of Nottingham in 922 marked the climax of his successes. In the
words of the chronicler ' he reduced the burgh and ordered it to be repaired,
1 See section on the Dom. Surv. for evidence of Danish influence in division of the county into
'wapentakes,' not hundreds.
1 Speed, A Prospect of the Most Famous Parts of the World, under Great Britain, bk. i, p. 56.
' See Overton's map of the county.
4 Angl.-Sax. Chron. (Rolls Ser.), i, 132. Matt. Paris, Chron. Maj. (Rolls Ser.), i. 391. Burhred sent
to Ethelred for help, and he, gathering a large force, came to Nottingham. ' Cumque pagan!, arcis tuitione
muniti, praelium conserere denegarent et Christian! muros confringere non sufficerent pace inter Mercios et
paganos ad tempus composita singuli ad propria sunt reversi.'
POLITICAL HISTORY
and peopled both with Englishmen and with Danish.' Then it was that 'all
the people who were settled in the Mercian's land submitted to him, both
Danish and English. 'l Two years later Edward again visited Nottingham and
secured his conquest by a second ' burgh ' stationed on the south side of the
river opposite the other fortification, and connected with the other by a
bridge ' built and manned there in the immediate neighbourhood.'8 A mixed
population of Danish and English seems to have inhabited the town and
possibly the county of Nottingham until the reign of Edmund, a younger son
of Edward the Elder. He, in the year 940 or 941, seems to have entirely
repeopled the five boroughs with Englishmen.8 If this statement is true it
may be that Edmund's idea was to draw closer the union between Wessex and
Mercia, and clench his father's policy. But Danish influence still remained
strong in the county,* and all hope of continuing Edward's policy of concen-
tration was frustrated by the weakness of the monarchy and the unhappy
rivalry between the incapable Edwy and his brother Edgar, when the Danelaw,
with English Mercia, chose Edgar for their king, while Wessex remained true
to Edwy. When Edwy was dead and Edgar was sole king, Nottingham,
both town and county, must have grown prosperous again under the just and
peaceful rule of Edgar and his wise adviser St. Dunstan. But after Edgar's
death, when England, prepared for subjugation by the unstable rule of Ethel-
red the Unready, was being forced into submission by the Danish Cnut,
Mercia and the Danelaw had to be reduced, as the entrance to the north, and
Nottinghamshire, as one of the most important keys to that position, suffered
with the rest.6 Yet there is little definite information concerning the part
taken by the county in the desperate struggle which followed Cnut's death,
and finally resulted in the battle of Hastings. The break up of Mercia under
Harthacnut had meant the formation of a new earldom of the middle
English, over which Earl Godwin set his nephew Beorn, brother of Swein
Estrithson, and of which Nottingham formed part. After the treacherous
murder of Beorn by Swein, son of Godwin, in 1049-50,' the earldom seems to
have again become part of Leofric's earldom of Mercia, and so to have come
to his grandsons Edwin and Morkere. Jealousy of the house of Godwin led
these two Mercian earls to forsake Harold,7 as jealousy of William's success
led them later to rebel against him, and the men of Nottingham were of
necessity drawn into their treachery. It was to Nottingham that William
went with his whole army 8 in 1068, when he heard that ' the people of the
north had gathered themselves together and would stand against him if he
came." The burghs which Edward the Elder had raised were undoubtedly
guarded against him, but it would almost seem as though the town was half-
hearted in its defence, since the number of king's thegns retaining their land
in the county at the time of the Domesday Survey would seem to suggest that
it made an easy submission.
1 Jng/.-Sax. Chron. (Rolls Ser.), i, 195 ; ii, 84. Matt. Paris, op. cit. i, 445. Ric. de Clrencatria (Rolls
Ser.), ii, 57. * jfngl.-Sax. Chron. (Rolls Ser.), i, 196 ; ii, 84.
8 Ibid, ii, 89. Thus also Robert of Gloucester records that Edmund drove away ' the Saracens ' that
were yet remaining in Lincoln, Leicester, Derby, Stafford, and Nottingham, and ' brought back Christian men
in their stead.' Rob. ofGIouc. (Rolls Ser.), i, 409.
4 See Introd. to Dom. Surv. * See former reference to the harrying of the county by Cnut.
6 Angl.-Sax. Chron. (Rolls Ser.), i, 307 ; ii, 140. ' Ibid.
8 Flor. Wlgprn (Eng. Hist. Soc.), ' Rex Willelmus cum exercitu suo Snottingaham venit.'
* Angl.-Sax. Chron. (Rolls Ser.), i, 342 ; ii, 172.
3'9
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
The success of the Norman brought a fresh era of life for Nottingham.
William, like Edward the Elder, secured his possession by making up a new
castle,1 not with Edward's idea of protecting the borough on either bank of
the river, but on the highest point of the rock overhanging the town, where
it would serve both to protect the town and keep the burghers submissive.'
The importance with which Nottingham was regarded is perhaps nowhere
better shown than in the Domesday entry reciting the duty of the
burghers : ' In Snotingeham the water of Trent and the Fosse (Way) and the
road towards York were so guarded that if any one should hinder the
passage of boats, or if any one should plough or make a ditch within
two perches of the king's road he should be compelled to amend it with
8 pounds.' s Although the existence of this castle must have added much to
the political status of Nottingham, its existence is ignored by the Domesday
Survey, and there is little or nothing known about its history during the
reign of William except that it was committed to the custody of William
Peverel, to whom nine manors in the county belonged.4
The reign of William Rufus, though it could hardly have been a time
of prosperity,6 seems to have brought little history for the county. Indirectly
there comes almost the first mention6 of the local levy, since Nottinghamshire
evidently furnished its quota of men and money, when in 1094, by Ralph
Flambard's connivance, 20,000 men were summoned from the English coun-
ties for service in Normandy, and dismissed at Hastings after their service
money had been taken from them.7 Again, the reign of Henry I brings very
little history. The years of plague and famine, the heavy taxes caused by the
constant petty warfare between the king and his vassals, must have fallen
heavily on Nottinghamshire, as on all England. Doubtless, too, a time of
prosperity seemed to be again beginning under the reforms which Henry
inaugurated, only to be again ended, as the county was plunged into the dis-
orders of Stephen's reign. Into these disorders Nottingham was of necessity
drawn. Thus, when David of Scotland advanced into England against
Stephen in 1138, the militia of Nottinghamshire, under William Peverel,
fought for Stephen at the Battle of the Standard.8 And now for the first
time the castle of Newark comes definitely into history. Theories are rife
that Newark was a Roman city, and that the site of the castle was occupied
by a large granary like Colchester or London Tower.9 Egbert, king of
Wessex, is moreover said to have raised the first fortification, which fell into
1 ' He went to Nottingham and there wrought a castle.' Angl.-Sax. Ckron. (Rolls Ser.), i, 342.
Thus Camden states that the castle was built ' to bridle the English, and was so strong by nature
and art (according to William of Newburgh) that if properly defended it seemed as if nothing but famine
could force it.' Camden, Brit. (ed. Gough), ii, 283.
3 See section on Dom. Surv. * Ibid.
6 See Chron. Angl. Petrib. (Caxton Soc.), 65. Flor. Wigorn (Engl. Hist. Soc.), iv, 35.
6 The first mention would be that implied in 1053, when Earl Morkere went south 'with Nottingham-
shire.' See supra.
1 Sax. Chron. (ed. Earle), 230. 'Da sende cyng hider to lande et het abeodan at xx }>usenda Engliscra
manna him to fultume to Normandig. ac )?a hi to sae coman. pa het hi man cyrran and f feoh syllan to Saes
cynges behofe \z hi genumen hacfdon. pet wass asle man healf punda, and hi swa dydon.'
Flor. Wigprn (Engl. Hist. Soc.), ii, 3 5. ' Quibus ut mare transirent Heastingae congregatis pecuniam quae
data fuerat eis ad victum Rannulphus Passeflambardus praecepto regis abstulit, scilicet, unicuitjue decem solidos
et cos domum repedare mandavit ; pecuniam vero regi transmisit.'
8 Symeonis mmacki opera ornma (Rolls Ser.), ii, 294. ' Affluit etiam cum suis copiis de Nottingham scira
Willelmus Peverel.'
' Cornelius Brown, Ann. ofNctcark-on-Trent; Mackenzie, Castles of England, i, 449, quoting Stukeley.
320
POLITICAL HISTORY
the hands of the Danes,1 but was recovered and rebuilt by Earl Leofric of
Mercia, who held the manor of Newark.8 The omission of any entry con-
cerning it in Domesday is, of course, no evidence for its non-existence, and
possibly some such fortifications as those built by Edward the Elder at Not-
tingham may have been raised for the defence of the town. However, the
first actual fortress was built in 1 123 by ' Alexander the Magnificent,' bishop
of Lincoln, and brother of the famous Roger, bishop of Salisbury,8 under the
plea that such fortifications were absolutely necessary in his diocese in those
times of lawlessness, ad tutamen et dignitatem episcopi* Although Alexander
had sworn allegiance to Maud as ' lady of England and Normandy,' he
immediately transferred his allegiance to Stephen on Henry's death. How-
ever, in the anarchy which followed, both Alexander and his uncle, Nigel of
Ely, fell under Stephen's suspicion, and in 1139 were thrown into prison until
they should surrender their castles.6 Alexander, kept sub vili tugurio, was
hurried across England with Stephen and his army to Newark, and kept with-
out food until the garrison surrendered. With Newark in Stephen's possession,
and Nottingham in the hands of William Peverel,8 one of his most trusted
adherents, the county was inevitably drawn into alliance with Stephen's cause.
In 1 140, a few months before the siege of Lincoln was begun, Robert earl of
Gloucester, one of Maud's adherents, by the prompting of Ralph Painel, who
was evidently a private enemy of William Peverel, advanced on Nottingham
and took the city. Some of the citizens fled, others were slain, and many
burnt as they sought sanctuary in houses and churches ; for when one citizen
who seemed richer than the others was led to his house and forced to dis-
cover his treasure to the enemy, he led them into a cellar where his riches
were kept, and while they were gloating over the spoil slipped out, shut and
bolted the door behind him, and, setting fire to the house and cellars, burnt
the spoilers with the spoil. But the fire spread over the whole city, and
Nottingham, that noble city which, according to the chronicler, had remained
peaceful, rich, and populous from the time of the Conquest, was utterly
destroyed.7 It seems evident, however, that even if the town was burnt so
completely the castle must have escaped, as in the next year the Empress
Maud, after her success at Lincoln, is said to have forced the castle from
William Peverel, and to have given it into the custody of William Painel,
who was probably some connexion of the Ralph before mentioned.8 Early
in 1142, when Maud's cause seemed to be hopeless, Stephen's adherents in
the county seemed to have taken courage, and garrisoned themselves in an
offensive position at Southwell. Thus William Painel went out from Not-
tingham with a body of troops to raze the fortifications that had been made
in the precincts of the church of St. Mary, Southwell, and whither a
* Cornelius Brown, op. cit. 6. ' Ibid. 8, 9.
1 Ann. Man. (Rolls Ser.), iv, 1 8. Gtrvase of Cant. (Rolls Ser.), vii.
4 Will, of Malmes. Geit. Reg. Angl. sub Hist. Novell, ii, 547.
5 Ibid. 548-55. The account of the seizure of the castles, and the later discussion of the case before the
papal legate is here given in full.
* A descendant of the William Peverel, of Domesday, probably a great great grandson.
r Gervase of Cant. (Rolls Ser.), i, 112. Flor. ffigorn (Engl. Hist. Soc.), ii, 128, 129. ' Itaque destructa
est Snottingaham, urbs nobilissima, cum, ex quo Normanni Angliam sibi subjugaverunt, usque ad hoc tempus,
in summa pace et quiete, populosa multitudine et opulentia rerum omnium referta fuisset.'
8 Symeonis monachi opera omnia (Rolls Ser.), ii, 309. ' Castrum de Notingham imperatrix Adela exegit
a Willelmo Peverel, et imposuit custodem in eo Willelmum Painel cum militibus suis.'
I 321 41
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
multitudo provinciae had gathered. Being unable to cope with them with the
forces at his disposal, he marched out to meet the empress and gain reinforce-
ments. Meantime, however, William Peverel was plotting to regain the
castle during Painel's absence, and having succeeded in gaining the confidence
of two youths who had charge of the mills under the castle, managed by their
connivance to scale the castle rock with his followers and seize the castle.
Thereupon all the partizans of the empress were driven out of Nottingham.1
The result of this was presumably a union of the forces at Southwell with
those of Nottingham, and it is little likely that William Painel returned from
York with his reinforcements.
The deliberate stand which Nottingham town and county had made
for Stephen brought it early under the notice of Maud's son, Henry II, and
brought the governor of Nottingham Castle under his disfavour. In 1152,
as duke of Normandy, Henry granted the fee of William Peverel to Ranulf,
earl of Chester, unless William should be able to clear himself of his crime
and treason in his court (' nisi poterit se dirationare in mea curia de scelere et
traditione.') ' When he invaded England in the next year Henry realized the
advisability of securing a hold on Nottingham, and having stormed Stamford
and Ipswich he advanced to Nottingham and besieged the town. However,
the garrison of the castle came out with great force and managed to break up
the siege by setting fire to the town.8 Then, since the town was destroyed,
and the natural defence offered by the castle rock was so strong, being un-
willing to waste his energies, Henry evidently abandoned all attempt to
seize the fortress.4 When Stephen died in October, 1154,' and Henry,
according to the Treaty of Winchester, peacefully succeeded, he began at
once to establish order by compelling the surrender of all adulterine castles,'
among which was possibly the castle of Cuckney, in Nottinghamshire,
built in Stephen's reign by Thomas de Cuckney.7 In Nottingham itself he
completed the humiliation of William Peverel (who had in the meantime
contrived to poison his rival, Ranulf, earl of Chester) by depriving him of the
castle and all his estates. William, on Henry's accession, had fled to a
monastery and received the tonsure, and assumed the monastic habit.8 When,
in February, 1155, Henry advanced to Nottinghamshire, he again fled,
leaving his castle and possessions in the king's hands.9 Nottingham was thus
secured as a royal station, and was held by the king until granted by him to
Prince John in 1 174 in the treaty which followed the great insurrection of
that critical year.10 During the next year Henry himself was at Notting-
ham, and while there sued the landowners of the county for breach of the
forest laws, presumably in the forest of Sherwood, 'et posuit omnes in
misericordia sua pro capta vensione.' In many cases they were bound to
the king for more than their estates were worth, but he refused to yield them
1 Symemts monachl opera omnia (Rolls Ser.), ii, 3 1 i-i 2. * Rymer, Feed, i, 4.
1 Rob. o/Glouc. (Rolls. Ser.), ii, 864. « Trivet, Annah, 29.
* Chron. of the Reigns ef Stephen, Hen, II, etc. (Rolls Sen), iv, 181.
' Ibid. 183. Gervaie of Cant. (Rolls Ser.), i, 1 6 1 .
' Mackenzie, Castles tf England, i, 447.
' Gervaie of Cant. (Rolls Ser.), i, 1 6 1 . » Ibid.
10 Gervase of Cant. (Rolls Ser.), i, 78. Henry, since he had been completely successful in quelling the
insurrection of his sons, allied with France and Scotland, against their father, could afford to be merciful. Thus
he granted two castles in Poitou to Richard, others in Brittany to Geoffrey, and those of Nottingham and
Marlborough to his favourite, John.
322
POLITICAL HISTORY
mercy, although Richard de Lucy, the justiciar, pleaded their cause, stating
that the forest laws had been broken during the late hostilities by a special
mandate given him by the king when in Normandy.1 Henry again visited
Nottingham in 1 179, when he spent Christmas there, attended by William
of Scotland and all the nobles of the realm,8 and in 1 181, when he held a
council there.'
After a period of comparative peace under Henry II, the county was to
see troublous times during the reigns of Richard and John, and again the
chief scenes of its history were centred round the castles of Nottingham and
Newark. Richard, on his arrival in England after his father's death in 1 189,
took possession of the royal treasure at Winchester, and proceeded to win his
brother's favour by granting him many honours, among them the earldom of
Nottingham.4 The utter failure of all Richard's attempts to keep John
faithful to him during his absence resulted in the open quarrel between John
and Longchamp in 1191, the consequent seizure by John of the castles of
Nottingham and Tickhill, probably in April 1191,' and his threat to the
chancellor if he refused to give up the castle of Lincoln.8 A compromise
was effected by the queen-mother, and John surrendered Nottingham Castle
to William Marshall, and Tickhill to William de Wendeval,7 with special
reservation that if Richard before his return should refuse the terms of the
peace between John and the chancellor both the castles should be restored to
John.8 It seems unlikely that either William Marshall or William de Wen-
deval ever actively fulfilled the office of governor of the two castles.9 Both,
however, were granted to Roger de Lacy, constable of Chester, by
Longchamp presumably about this date, and he, judging from the easy
surrender that had been made to John how little the garrisons could be relied
on to support Richard's cause, urged that Robert de Crokstone, governor of
Nottingham, together with the governor of Tickhill, should be hanged for
treachery. Being unable to accomplish this, since they refused to stand on
trial, he seized and hung a certain Alan de Leek, or Lee, who had been in
the castle with Robert, together with one of the officers of Tickhill. John
interceded, but in vain, and in revenge seized the estates of the constable, and
harried his lands. 10 From this time Nottingham evidently embraced John's
cause, and the castle held out for him after all others he had seized had
surrendered to Richard on his return from captivity in 1194. Hence
Richard quickly marched to storm Nottingham, 25 March, 1194, but the
garrison surrendered, and placed themselves at his mercy. Some he im-
prisoned, others he compelled to ransom themselves, since he was in great
1 Chron. of Hen. II and Rich. I (Rolls Ser.), i, 94. Roger of Hoveden (Rolls Ser.), ii, 79.
1 Chron. of Hen. 11 and Ric. I (Rolls Ser.), i, 244. * Ibid. 280.
4 Ibid, ii, 78. Roger of Hoveden (Rolls Ser.), iii. 6. Matt. Paris, Chron. Maj. (Rolls Ser.), ii, 347-8.
Matthew Paris says he granted the 'Castella de Notingeham ' to John, but this hardly seems possible, since the
castle was evidently held by a royal garrison in 1191.
6 L'Histoire de Guillaume k Marechal (Soc. de 1'histoire de France), iii, 130, ». l.
' Chron. of Hen. II and Ric. I (Rolls Ser.), ii, 207.
* The accounts of the two chroniclers Roger of Hoveden and Richard of Devizes differ. In the latter
Nottingham is given to William de Wendeval, and that of Tickhill to Reginald de Wassevile.
' Roger of Hoveden (Rolls Ser.), iii, 136, 137.
9 In the case of William Marshall this seems undoubtedly proved by the fact that the con-
temporary author of his life in the Histoire de Guillaume le Marechal makes no mention even of the grant
of the office.
10 Chron. of Hen. II and Ric. I (Rolls Ser.), ii, 232-4.
323
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
need of money.1 For a short time Richard remained at Nottingham, and
Walter of Coventry and Roger of Hoveden tell how he made an expedition
on 28 March to Clipstone and to Sherwood Forest, which he had never seen
before, and they pleased him much (et plac ue runt el multuni) . s During the
next few days a council was held at Nottingham at which Richard ' prayed
that justice should be done him,' on John and his chief ally, Hugh, bishop of
Coventry. As a result both were cited to appear within forty days or forfeit
the one his claims to the kingdom, the other his offices in church and state, as
well as all their possessions. From Nottingham Richard advanced to Clip-
stone to meet the king of Scots, spent Palm Sunday there, and reached
Southwell on 4 April. Hence he went to Winchester for his second corona-
tion on 17 April.8
Early in John's reign Nottingham was the scene of one of his character-
istic acts of impetuous cruelty. Enraged at the Welsh rising of r 2 1 2, he
revenged himself by marching to Nottingham, and there, before he had
eaten (antequam cibum sumeret), he caused the eight Welsh hostages in the
castle to be hung. Then, as he sat down to eat, messengers came from the
king of Scots and from the Welsh queen, John's natural daughter, telling him
of the disaffection of the northern barons.4 In this year the discontent
which had been brewing under John's misrule came to a crisis, but John's
clever move in submitting to the pope warded off the danger for a time. A
second clever move, the calling of the council of St. Albans in 1213, was
followed by a visit to Nottingham, whither went also Archbishop Langton,
who, unsuccessful in his attempts at peace, left Nottingham, and a few days
later6 produced Henry II's coronation charter, and gave the baronial party
their watchword. John's submission at Runnymede was followed in 1215
by preparations against the barons, and an order to Philip Marc, constable of
Nottingham, to fortify the castle as for a siege.8 Evidently Nottingham
was one of the king's chief stations, and when hostilities had begun, after
his northern march in the same year, he retired cum satellitibus suis
nefandissimis to Nottingham, and spent the following Christmas there.7
The unsettled state of the county generally is implied by the order of
Louis of France to Gilbert of Ghent in 1 2 1 6 to repress the irruptions of the
garrisons of Nottingham and Newark, since they were creating great
devastations by spreading fire and slaughter in all the country round.8 But
all attempts made to overwhelm the garrisons were unsuccessful. Both
Nottingham and Newark remained true to John, and it was to Newark that
he went after his disastrous march of 1216, and at Newark that he died.9
On the death of John, William Marshall, earl of Pembroke, and Gualo,
the papal legate, immediately proclaimed Prince Henry king, but as yet the
1 Ralph de Coggeshall, Chnn. Angl. (Rolls Ser.), 63. Matt. Paris, Cbron. Maj. (Rolls Ser.), ii, 404.
Robert of Gloucester tells the story thus: — ' )?o king richard com to engelond J>er was joy e inou. Mid joye
& procession . J>at fole a Jen him drou. He pleyede nywe king at ome. ]>o he hom. com. Verst ];e castel
of notingham. vpe is broker he nom. & su)?)>e is oj?cr londes, & deseritede him al clene.' Rob. of
Glouc. (Rolls Ser.), ii, 697-8. A full account of the siege is given in L'Histoire de Gutllaume le Marccbal, iii,
1 34-6, together with the details of the events of the day following, when Richard demanded homage from
Walter de Lacy and William Marshall for their lands in Ireland.
' Walter tf Coventry (Rolls Ser.), ii, 54. » Roger of Hoveden (Rolls Ser.), iii, 240-3.
4 Matt. Paris, Chron. Maj. (Rolls Ser.), ii, 534. s Ibid. 551-2.
1 ' Ut castra sua victualibus munirent fossatis ambirent, serventibus stipendiariis roborarent, balistas et
machinas pararent, spicula fabricarent." Ibid. 612.
' Ibid. 637-8. • Ibid. 663. ' Ibid. 667-8.
324
POLITICAL HISTORY
whole county was in a state of disorder. Louis of France had received
reinforcements, and with the insurgent barons he besieged the castle of
Mountsorrel in Leicestershire. A plundering expedition into the surround-
ing country was made by the besiegers early in 1217, but some knights,
reconnoitring (exploratores milites] from Nottingham, learning of their coming,
set out to meet them, and succeeded in killing three of the enemy, and
capturing ten knights and twenty-four squires.1 Raising the siege of
Mountsorrel, Louis and his allies turned to besiege Lincoln Castle, which
held out for the king, although the town had surrendered. William
Marshall hastened to gather an army, and ordered all governors of castles
and their soldiers to come together at Newark, to proceed thence to Lincoln
and break up the siege. And they came joyfully, being eager to fight with
the Frenchmen.' After the fall of Lincoln and the defeat of the French
fleet by Hubert de Burgh, Louis realized that his cause was hopeless, and,
making peace with William Marshall, retired to France. But even after
peace was made there were many who could not keep their hands from
pillage (' nunc post pacem denuntiatam et omnibus concessam non potuerunt
manus a praeda cohibere'). Thus Robert de Gaugi, even after several
remonstrances from the king, refused to deliver up the castle and town of
Newark to Hugh, bishop of Lincoln, to whom it properly belonged by right
of its foundation by Alexander (see supra). Therefore the Earl-Marshal, by
the king's orders, raised a large army, and, accompanied by the king, attacked
the castle. The siege lasted for nearly eight days, during which time the
friends of Robert treated for peace with the bishop, and a final agreement
was made that the castle should be delivered to the bishop on payment of
>Tioo sterling. And thus the siege being raised, every one returned to his
home.8
From this time the reign of Henry III seems to have been one of
material prosperity for Nottinghamshire. The frequent visits that Henry paid
to the county are shown by the number of letters patent dated from Southwell,
Newark, and Nottingham.4 Moreover, he confirmed John's charter of 1200
to the burgesses of Nottingham, and granted them many fresh rights and privi-
leges.1 In 1264 the county was for the first time actively concerned in the
Barons' War. The failure of the Provisions of Oxford to bring about any lasting
settlement had resulted in the siege and capture of Northampton by the royal
forces. Thence the army marched through Leicester into Nottingham. The
castle was then held for the barons by William Bardolf, who, on the advance of
the royal troops, immediately came out and surrendered to the king. While
the army was quartered at Nottingham several Scotch nobles came to the
king's help, among them John de Balliol, Robert Bruce, and Peter Bruce,
with a strong fighting force.8 From Nottingham the king sent out Prince
Edward to harry the neighbouring counties of Derby and Stafford, and to
seize on the lands of Robert de Ferrers, earl of Derby, who was among the
hostile barons. When this was done, the king, hearing that Simon de
1 Matt. Paris, Chron. Maj. (Rolls Sen), iii, 1 1 ; Roger of Wendover, Florti Hist. (Rolls Scr.), ii, 208.
' Roger of Wendover, floret Hist. (Rolls Ser.), ii, ±12.
3 Et sic, obsidione soluta, unusquisque ad propria remeavit. Ibid. 226-8.
4 See various entries in the Calendars of Patent and Close Rolls.
4 Robt. Chart, in Tun: Lond. (Rec. Com.), 39.
6 Matthew of Westminster, Fkres Hist. ( Rolls Ser.), ii, 488.
325
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Montfort was besieging Rochester, left Nottingham and marched south, but
De Montfort, hearing of his coming, raised the siege and retreated to London
to prepare his forces before the fateful battle of Lewes.1 With the com-
pletion of peace, after the battle of Evesham in 1265, an order was sent to
John de Grey, governor of Nottingham Castle, bidding him see that the
king's peace was observed, on pain of loss of lands and estates, and that the
prisoners remaining in the castle were sent to London. *
The regime of law and order under the strong rule of Edward I resulted,
in Nottinghamshire, as elsewhere, in a repression of the strength of local
jurisdiction and privilege. Hence, under the commission of 1275, the returns
known as the Hundred Rolls were made, to search out and recover royal rights
and jurisdiction. Edward saw that supreme influence in the state must ulti-
mately belong to the power which controlled the law courts, and thus he
determined to limit the jurisdiction of manorial lords and define the causes they
might and might not try. The returns show how needful from the royal point
of view such a policy was in Nottinghamshire as elsewhere. Suits had been
withdrawn from the hundred courts ; thus the honour of Tickhill and the fee
of Peverel were accustomed to send six suitors to the hundred court of Rush-
cliffe, but now two of the suitors had withdrawn, one of them paid suit
instead to the court of Tickhill, the other to that of William Peverel.8 The
lords of the county claimed power of life and death and right to exclude the
sheriff from their demesne ; thus the bishop of Lincoln claimed the right of
namium -vetitum, and the right to have gallows, pillory, tumbrel, and assize of
bread and ale within half the wapentake of Newark* ; the bailiffs of the
honour of Leicester refused to allow the king's ministers to fulfil their duties
in their bailiwicks, and at the same time refused to put the king's mandates
into execution themselves.5 Again the Hundred Rolls show a state of
oppression and extortion in every grade. In the wapentakes of Thurgarton
and Lye, the sheriffs after the battle of Evesham had given up their baili-
wicks to extortioners who forced all the free tenants to pay suit at the hundred
court, or pay a fine on refusal.6 An assize of 1287 shows the same system of
oppression at work among small manorial lords. Henry de Pierrepoint and
Alice his wife were called to answer concerning services other than customary
exacted from their men of the manor of Sneynton. The tenants claimed that
their services were defined by the Domesday entry concerning ' Notinton,'
which was identical with Sneynton, but a complaisant jury was found to say
that the ' Notinton ' of Domesday was not Sneynton but a part of Notting-
ham, so that the case against Henry and Alice fell through.7
The reign of Edward I brought more than a regime of law and order
to Nottinghamshire, for it brought the beginning of its parliamentary history.
The first extant return of knights of the shire is for the Parliament of 1295,*
for although writs were issued for those of 1282, 1283, 1290, and 1294, the
returns are missing.' Writs were also issued to the burgesses of Nottingham
for the Parliament of I283,10 but again there is no extant return until 1295."
Two members for the county and two members for the borough represented
1 Matthew of Westminster, Flores Hist. (Rolls Ser.), ii, 488. ' Rymer, Foed. i, pt. 2, 88.
' Rot. HunJ. (Rec. Com.), ii, 28. 4 Ibid. 29. • Ibid. 28.
' Ibid. 29. ' Abbrev. Plac. (Rec. Com.), 209.
8 Par/. Writt (Rec. Com.), i, 40. • Ibid, i, 10, 16, 21, 26.
10 Ibid, i, 1 6. "Ibid. 1,40.
326
POLITICAL HISTORY
Nottinghamshire until 1572, when East Retford was made a parliamentary
borough and sent two members. It was not until 1672-3 that Newark upon
Trent was incorporated and entitled to send two members.
In the natural course of events Nottinghamshire played its part in the
Welsh and Scotch wars of Edward I, both in contributing its share in money
and victuals and in furnishing its quota of men. Thus in 1282, on the
occasion of the second rising in Wales, the bailiffs of Nottingham were ordered
to obey the commands of William Wyther, commissioner of array for the
county, who was empowered to raise 300 foot soldiers in Nottinghamshire
and Derbyshire.1 Fresh disturbances in Wales during Edward's absence in
1287 brought a fresh demand for seventeen-score foot soldiers from the two
counties.3 The strained relations between Scotland and England, coincident
with the attack of Philip IV on Gascony and a fresh insurrection in Wales,
made warlike preparations an immediate necessity in 1 294. Hence the com-
mission in that year to Nottinghamshire, among the other counties north of
the Trent, to provide its quota of footmen and send them to meet the king at
Chester and march against the Welsh.3 Footmen were also summoned from
the county for each of the Scotch expeditions. For example, in 1299 a quota
of 500 foot soldiers was ordered from Nottinghamshire,4 and a writ was
addressed to the commissioner of array for the county, with a command that
if the men were unwilling to march to Newcastle because of the bad money
current in the kingdom or the inclemency of the weather, they should be
induced by promise of a bounty from the king beyond their regular pay.6
In the next year a commission was issued to John Byron and Richard de
Havering to make inquiry concerning and punish the bailiffs, bedels and
others who lately took reward from the footmen of the county of Nottingham,
when they came to Blyth, and gave them licence to return home.6 In the
June of the same year Richard Bingham and Robert Joyce, the commissioners
appointed to select 1,500 footmen from Nottinghamshire for the Scotch war,
were ordered also to select a proportionate number of constables in the
county, well equipped with horses and arms, to come with the footmen to
Carlisle.7 A similar mandate in the next year, 1301, shows the quota required
that year as 1,000 footmen.8 Evidently the constant service was found to be
very irksome, and thus there is another mandate for the punishment of the
bailiffs and bedels who had received bribes from the 1,000 footmen selected
in the county of Nottingham. All those who had stayed at home were
to come without delay to the army at their own expense, and the bribed
ministers were to be imprisoned and kept in gaol until further orders.9
But, in Nottinghamshire, as in most of the counties, the chief burden of
the wars fell on the gentry of the county. In 1276, all who held in chief
and were able to bear arms were ordered to muster at Worcester or provide
substitutes.10 A comparison of the names of those who held knights' fees in
the county at the time of the Testa de Nevill,11 and of those summoned at
various times by parliamentary writs to perform military service,19 shows how
thoroughly the system was worked, and how every baronial lord was forced
1 Part. Writs (Rec. Com.), i, 245. s Ibid. * Ibid.
4 Ibid, i, 326. * Ibid. 6 Cal. efPat. 1292-1301, 489.
7 Ibid. 519. ' Ibid. 596. • Ibid. 60 1.
10 Par/. Writs. (Rec. Com.), i, 196. " Testa de Nevitt (Rec. Com.).
" Par!. Writs (Rec. Com.), i, under ' Writs for Military Service.'
327
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
to pay his service to the full. The representatives of the landed interest were
also forced to take up arms. Thus, in 1282, a writ was directed to the
sheriff of Nottingham, among others, ordering that, ' Since Lewelin son of
Griffin and his accomplices had destroyed the peace of the realm,' all those
who had more than £20 worth of land, and were not then with the king in
Wales, were ordered to serve or purchase exemption.1
The military system which the wars of Edward I had developed was
well tested in the reign of his son, when Edward II, estranged from his
barons by his zealous attachment to Piers Gaveston, was forced to rely mainly
on the militia in order to carry on the war with Scotland, which had been
his father's glory but was to be his own disgrace. In July, 1308, came a
commission for the levy of 500 footmen from the counties of Nottingham
and Derby,3 followed in the October of the next year by a commission for
400." In 1311 a general order was sent to the sheriff of each county for the
provision of one foot soldier from each town for the hosting of the war
against the Scots,* and the sheriff of the counties was ordered to give 64*. for
sixteen days to Richard Daniel and Thomas Folejaumbe, who were to lead
the footmen of Nottingham and Derby to Roxburgh.6 The levies of 1314
were evidently a longer time than usual in coming together, for in that year
an order was sent to the sheriffs of several counties, including Nottingham and
Derby, bidding them hasten in the gathering of the levies since Stirling was
in great danger.' During the next year Thomas de Crecy was commissioned
to choose sixty able footmen from the wapentake of Broxton, in Nottingham-
shire, and lead them to Scotland for service. He, however, seems to have
turned his office into a means of making money, since after the sixty men
had been raised to be led to Scotland, he received various gifts from them to
allow them to return home. An order to the sheriff to inquire into his
conduct and punish the offence was accordingly made in the December
of the same year.7 The war still dragged on, since Edward refused all idea of
making peace with Robert Bruce, and year after year, in spite of the disease
and famine of 1315 and 1316, fresh demands for infantry were made from the
counties. Thus, in 1316, came a demand for 1,000 footmen from Notting-
ham and Derby, of whom 200 were to be woodcutters (/mgatores) ; in
1317, for 2,000 footmen, 200 of whom were to be slingers (fundatores).*
From the town of Nottingham forty footmen were demanded in the next year,
and ten from Newark.9 These demands, like those from the other northern
counties, were distinctly heavy, and show how the king's policy was to make
the brunt of the war fall on the counties it most vitally affected.
During the reign of Edward II several entries on the Patent Rolls give
a glimpse of town-life in Nottingham during the fourteenth century. There
seems to have been a general feud between town and castle, and John Segrave,
who was constable of the castle, was evidently on exceptionally bad terms
with the townsmen. The mayor who was elected for the year 1313
sided with the constable. Hence the townsmen banded themselves together,
slew the mayor and assaulted the royal officers and servants who were in
charge of the castle. They went further, and when the murderer of the
1 Part. Writs. (Rec. Com.), i, 10.
* Cal. of Pat. 1307-13, 82. ' Par/. Writs (Rec. Com.), ii, pt. 2, 383.
4 Ibid. 408. "Ibid. 410. 'Ibid. 427.
' Ibid. 460. " Ibid. " Ibid. 506.
328
POLITICAL HISTORY
mayor was being led to the castle prison, bells were rung and a band of
townsmen rushed forward to rescue the prisoner, while others secretly entered
the castle, caused the crown of the murderer's head to be shaved, and com-
mitted other outrages. A commission of inquiry into the case was ordered
to be made in the October of the same year.1 In the April of 1315
John Segrave made a further complaint against the inhabitants of Nottingham
concerning what seems to have been another riot. Robert Ingram and
others having summoned the commonalty by the ringing of the common bell,
' with force and arms and banners displayed ' attacked the castle, broke the
gates, and besieged it for eight days, ' not allowing the constable or any of
his men to go out thence to obtain necessary provisions, and assaulting such
of his followers as they found without the castle in the town.' *
The unpopularity of the constable extended to the county as well as to
the town. He was justice of the forest beyond Trent as well as keeper of
Nottingham Castle, and in February, 1315, the ' good men ' of the county
of Nottingham united with those of the other northern counties in a
petition against Segrave and his ministers of the said forest and county that
they had committed many acts of extortion and oppression by the exaction
of prises, carriages, and divers sums of money, both from the men of his
bailiwick and custody and from the men of the county of Leicester.8 This
seems, indeed, to have been a favourite complaint against the constables
of Nottingham. Another instance occurs at a later date, when in 1395
the Commons petitioned against the ministers of Stephen Rumbilows, the
constable of Nottingham Castle, that they extorted 4^. from each cartload of
charcoal passing along the high-road through Sherwood Forest for the sole
use of the people of the surrounding district, and persisted in so doing,
although the judgement had been passed against them in the court of the
King's Bench.*
After the murder of Edward II Nottingham was brought actively
into the history of the times, since Mortimer and Isabel, having aroused
opposition on all sides, were fearful of the results of the meeting of the
Parliament of 1330 at Nottingham, and fortified themselves in Nottingham
Castle. Edward III, at last roused to a determination to throw off the
domination of Mortimer, knowing himself secure in the support of the
majority of the barons, who were the natural enemies of the earl, won over
the aid of William Eland, constable of the castle, and made his well-known
attack on the castle and on Mortimer and the queen. The subterranean
passage through which he and his followers crept up into the castle still
exists, and the whole scene is not difficult to picture.' From this time
Edward was freed from tutelage, and was able to carry out his ambitious
policy of war, involving the glory of victory overshadowed by the inevitable
spectre of heavy taxation and a merciless drain on the nation's strength in
money and men.
In the Scotch wars of Edward III, as in those of Edward I and II,
the county of Nottingham was forced to play an active part. The king
himself was frequently in the county, and used Nottingham as a station
1 Cal. of Pat. 1313-17, p. 63. * Ibid. p. 314.
5 Ibid. p. 311. ' Rolls of Par!. (Rec. Com.), iii, 330*7.
4 See account in Rob. de Avesbury, Hut. EJw. tercit (ed. Hearne), p. 8.
I 329 42
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
from whence to advance into Scotland.'1 In 1335 Thomas Lungvillers and
John de Mountenay were relieved from furnishing forty light horsemen
(hobelers) by a levy of £40 in ^e county, Newark excepted.2 During the
same year the inhabitants of the town of Nottingham made complaint that
they had been overburdened by an order to provide ten light horsemen, and
their quota was accordingly reduced to six.8 In 1336 William de Shareshull
and others were ordered to take an inquisition in the county, and to punish
according to their crime certain light horsemen, archers, and others, chosen
and arrayed to serve in the company of Thomas earl of Warwick, leader and
captain of the army, ' who did not set out, or after coming to those parts
stealthily withdrew and went home again, so that through their default the
enemy again carried fire and sword into the realm.' * Each year while the
war lasted came fresh demands and frequent attempts to evade the same.6
For instance, in 1346, John Fitz William and others were sentenced to lose
their lands and possessions because 'contemptibiliter detractaverant electionem
hominum pro bello Scotiae.' '
The disasters both at home and abroad which marked the reign of
Richard II were but the necessary outcome of the absorption of Edward III
in continental warfare. His grandson had to carry on the French war, the
character of which was changed by the fact that Crecy and Poitiers had taught
the French a lesson in generalship. He had also to face the social upheaval
which times of famine and plague, coming with times of heavy taxation and
disarrangement of labour, made inevitable. For ' Richard the Redeless '
both these tasks were impossible. He caught at the theories of absolutism
which were occupying the minds of the great jurists of the time, and for
him the king was to be solutus legibus in practice as in theory, whereas in
the Middle Ages theory and practice could never agree. It was the battle
between this absolutist theory and the counter-development of Wiclifs ideas
into the Lollard theory of the sovereignty of the people that was the far-
reaching cause of the Peasants' Revolt. Although the county of Notting-
ham was hardly affected directly by Lollardy, and thus took no active part
in the Peasants' Revolt, it suffered under the general causes of the social
discontent, and was moreover involved in Richard's absolutist schemes. It
was at Nottingham Castle that, having forced the judges to uphold the
prerogative of the crown, he prepared in 1387 for a coup d'etat against the
' over-mighty subject,' which, had it been successful, might have seriously
changed not only the course of Richard's reign, but the development of the
constitution.7 The * Wonderful or Merciless Parliament ' swept aside his
schemes, and, baffled for a time, he resorted to a policy of constitutional
government. But in 1397 came a second attempt to set up his royal
prerogative. The duke of Gloucester and the earls of Arundel and Warwick,
three of the lords appellant, were seized and sent to different castles. A
council was called at Nottingham, and there they were appealed of treason.8
By the end of the year Arundel was beheaded, Warwick banished, and
' Hence the majority of the great councils of the reign were held there, and many letters patent are
dated thence.
* Cal. of Pat. 1334-8, p. 131. *Rot. Scot. (Rec. Com.), i, 339$.
4 Cal. of Pat. 1 334-8, p. 575. • See the frequent levies throughout the Rolls of Scotland.
'Rot. Scot. (Rec. Com.), i, 68 jb.
* Walsingham, Hut. Angl. (Rolls Ser.), ii, 161, 174. 8 Ibid. p. 223.
33°
POLITICAL HISTORY
Gloucester suffocated, and Parliament was as a catspaw in the king's hands.1
Early in the next year Hereford and Norfolk, the last of the lords appellant,
were banished, ' the king was rid of Parliament and began to rule more
fiercely than before,'8 until by his arbitrary rule he prepared the way for the
Lancastrian.
Apart from the military service performed by the county, the reigns of
the two first Lancastrians seem to have furnished little towards the political
history of Nottinghamshire. Even the rebellion of 1450 seems hardly to
have affected the county, the only connexion being that in 1451 the mayor
of Nottingham let to farm a meadow in the common meadow of Nottingham
to raise money to furnish men to march with the king to Blackheath to
suppress Cade's rebellion.3
In the Wars of the Roses, although the strength of the Lancastrian
party lay in the north of England, the county of Nottingham seems on the
whole to have favoured the Yorkists, although the Lancastrians could reckon
among their number many of the county nobles.* The castle seems to have
been generally in Yorkist hands, and to have been one of the most useful
stations of Edward IV. After his victory at the second battle of St. Albans,
and his subsequent proclamation as king in London, the news that the queen
was gathering her northern forces called Edward north to prepare for the
victorious day at Towton. A commission was issued to Richard earl of
Warwick to array all the able-bodied men in Nottinghamshire and the
surrounding counties 'for defence against Henry VI and his adherents' ;6 and
Edward gathered his forces as he went, hoping that ' in the conflict of one
day he might perfect all his travailes and victoreyes.' * At Nottingham he is
said to have held a court ' to afford an opportunity to the nobility and
gentlemen of the district to render him their honour and support.'7
His next recorded visit to the county seems to be in 1469 on his way
northward to suppress Robert of Redesdale's rebellion. 8 Closely following on
this came his visit early in 1470, when, hearing that the earl of Warwick,
now supporting Henry, had landed in England with help from France, he
marched to Nottingham, and there proclaimed Warwick and his adherents
to be traitors.' In September, 1470, he was again at Nottingham, where he
awaited the arrival of Thomas, Lord Montague, with a strong force of 6,000
men ; but when Lord Montague, ' whom the king loved entirely,' 10 but
whose loyalty he had rewarded by giving him a marquisate with ' a pye's
nest to maintain it withal,'11 had arrived near Nottingham, he suddenly
declared for King Henry, and made a retrograde movement to meet Warwick
and Clarence and attack the king. But Alexander Carlisle, ' that was sarjeant
of the minstrels,' came to the king in great haste and told him of the treason
of Montague. Whereupon Edward fled ' from his host beside Nottingham '
to Bishop's Lynn in Norfolk, and thence to Holland.12 On his return to
1 Walsingham, Hist. Angl. (Rolls Ser.), ii, 224. et seq. 'Froissart (ed. Bcrner), iv, chap. 78.
s Stevenson, Rec. of the Son. ofNott. iii, 409.
4 For example, Thomas Lord Roos, Lord of Orston, in Notts, was one of the lords deprived of their
estates by attainder for allegiance to Henry, Cal. of Pat. 1461—7, 30.
4 Cal. of Pat. 1461-7, 31. • Polydore Virgil, Hilt, of Hen. VI, etc. (Camd. Soc.), 1 10.
7 Thomas Bailey, Annals of Notts, i, 329.
8 Paston Letters (ed. Gairdner), ii, 361.
' Chron. of the White Rose (ed. Giles), 229. 10 Ibid. 29. " Stow, Annals, 422.
" Chron. of the White Rose, 29 ; Cant. Hist. Croyland, 554.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
England in March, 1471, he landed at Ravenspur in Yorkshire, and came
south to Nottingham, where, according to Stow, ' Sir William Stanley, Sir
William Norris, and divers others brought him men, so that hee had then
4,000 or more.'1 Other chroniclers mention also Sir William Parr and Sir
James Harington, who came ' with two good bands of men, well arrayed
and habled for warr, the nombarof VIC (600) men,'8 and Sir Thomas Burgh
and Sir Thomas Montgomerie, with their aids, ' which caused him at their
first comming to make proclamation in his owne name, to wit, of King
Edward the fourth, boldlie affirming to him that they would serve no man
but a king.' s While he was at Nottingham Edward ' sent the scorers
alabowte the contries adioynynge to aspie and serche yf any gadyeryngs were
in any place agaynst hym.' These scouts reported that the duke of Exeter,
the earl of Oxford* and others, with a body of 4,000 men, were garrisoned
against him at Newark. But the duke and the earl, ' havynge knowledge
that the sayde forrydars of the kyng's had bene aforne the towne in the
evenynge,' and thinking that the whole army was coming upon them,
determined on flight, and ' erly, abowte two of the cloke in the mornynge,
they flede out of the towne, and ther they lost parte of the people that they
had gathered and brought with them thethar.'1 The king, however,
directly he heard of the gathering at Newark, had set out thither, but
learning, when he was within three miles of the town, that the leaders had
fled, he returned to Nottingham, wishing ' to kepe the next and right way
towards his sayde great Rebell, th' Erie of Warwick.' " From Nottingham
the royal forces marched to Leicester, and thence to London, whence they
rode to Barnet, where, ' under a hedge-side, were ready assembled a great
people in array of the Earl of Warwick's.' Thus the scene of action was
changed from north to south, and Nottinghamshire had no local part in the
decisive battles of 1471.
During the few unsettled years of his reign Richard III was often at
Nottingham, and seems to have done much to repair the damage done to
the castle during the late wars. While he was there, in 1484, the town was
the scene of an important gathering, when ambassadors came from James III
of Scotland, bringing a commission ' for the abstines of were be twyen
England and Scotland,' and ' for maryage by tweyne the Prince of Scottis,
and one of the kynges blood.' 7 It was when Richard was ' kepyng his howse
in the castell of Notyngham "in 1485 that the news of Henry of Richmond's
landing with a small force in Wales was brought to him. 8 Determined to
provide against any unexpected strength of the enemy, he sent commissions
to John duke of Norfolk, and other of his supporters, ' wyllynge theim to
mustre and viewe all their servauntes and tenentes, and to elect and choose
the moost courageous and active persones of the whole nomber, and with them
repaire to his presence with all spede and diligence.' ' Hearing, however,
1 Stow, Annals, 423.
* Hiit. of the Arrival of Edw. IV (Camd. Soc.), 7 ; Cbnn. of the White Rose (ed. Giles), 45-6.
1 Holinshed, Ctron. iii, 680. This was contrary to the promise of allegiance to Henry that Edward had
made to the citizens of York, which ' cast a great shame and dolor into the hartcs of the citizens.' Hall's
Cbron. 292.
' See Fenn'i Letters, ii, 59. The earl of Oxford, on hearing of Edward's arrival, had called upon the
gentry of his county bidding them meet him at Lynn in full array to proceed to Newark to meet the enemy.
" Hut. of the arrival ofEdw. IV (Camd. Soc.), 8. • Ibid. Chron. of the White Rose, 62.
1 Letters, etc. Ric. Ill and Hen. Vll (Rolls Ser.), i, 60-65. • HalTs Chnn. (ed. Ellis), 412. • Ibid.
332
POLITICAL HISTORY
that Henry had reached Shrewsbury unchecked, he determined to advance,
and having marshalled his forces outside Nottingham, ' with a frownynge
countenaunce and truculente aspect, mounted on a great white courser," rode
with them to Leicester and to the field of Bosworth.1
Nottinghamshire, thus actively concerned in the events which made
Henry VII king, was once more brought into the faction fight with the
attempt of Lambert Simnel as the tool of Irish and Yorkist party to
depose the king in 1489. Aroused like the rest of England to fight against
an army composed of Irish and German forces, Nottinghamshire was wholly
with Henry, and welcomed him on his march from Leicester to meet the
rebel forces as they advanced from Masham, in Yorkshire. At Nottingham,
' by a lytle wood called Bowres, he pytched his feelde,' and to him came
George Talbot, earl of Shrewsbury, and many other ' valeaunt capitaynes '
and ' noble and expert men of warre,' for he had ordered that ' all the persons
of the counties adjoyning that were hable and of strength to cary weapon
should be ready in an houres warnynge in case that any nede should requyre.'2
On the night of 15 June 'the king's hooste lay under the end of that hill
towarde Nottingham Lentonwarde, and his forward before him to Nottingham
bridge, and the Erie of Derby's hooste on the king's left hand to the meadows
beside Lenton.' A council of war was held in Nottingham Castle, and in
the morning the king set out with the army for Newark, accompanied by
' six goode and trewe men of the village of Ratcliffe, which showed his grace
the best waye for to conduct his hooste.'3 Tarrying a little while at Newark,
Henry marched three miles farther on, so placing himself between the enemy
and Newark, ' being loth that their army should get the commodity of that
town.' * The earl of Lincoln with the rebel force ' passed softly on his
journey,' and advancing probably through Mansfield and Southwell, forded
the Trent, and planted his camp ' at a lytle village called Stoke, nygh to the
king and his armye.' On the next day Henry divided his army into three
battalions, and approached Stoke, ' where was an equall and playne place for
both parties to darreigne the battaille.'6 The armies joined and fought
' earnestly and sharply,' and ' for a space so sore and so egrely of both partes
that no man could well judge to whom the victory was lyke to enclyne.'
But at last the king's vanguard entered the fray with such force and violence
that the enemy fled, leaving their leaders and about 4,000 men slain on the
field.'8
When the beginnings of reform under Henry VIII took shape in the
dissolution of the lesser monasteries, and aroused the conservatism of the
north, Nottinghamshire came once more into history as marking the southern
range of the 'Pilgrimage of Grace.' Early in October, 1536, rebellion
was known to be brewing in the county and the districts round, and the
rebels were gathering force at Newark. Thus in answer to a royal command
' to repress all evil-disposed persons lately assembled in those parts, and
apprehend the ringleaders and examine them of the grounds of the insur-
rection,' the earl of Shrewsbury wrote from his 'poor cot at Herdewyche
1 Hall's Chron. (ed. Ellis), 412. ' Ibid. 433.
1 Account of herald quoted in full by Bailey, Annals of Notts. i, 347-8.
4 Bacon, Hist, of Hen. Vll (ed. Murray), 286. ''Hairs Chron. (ed. Ellis), 434.
' Ibid.
333
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
in the forest of Shrywood ' that he was inclined to gather all the forces he
could at Nottingham on the following Sunday.1 Four days later he reported
that the scouts whom he had sent out to Newark had taken a messenger
from the enemy, who declared that his only object in bearing the missive
was to escape from Newark.* The news that the rebels of Lincolnshire had
retired on the duke of Suffolk's arrival quieted the king's fears, and thinking
that the Yorkshire rebels would be as quickly subdued he wrote to Shrews-
bury to advance upon them ' with my lords of Rutland and Huntingdon and
all the forces of Leicestershire and Nottinghamshire,' and when all things
were appeased in Lincolnshire and Holderness to dissolve the whole army
and come home, sending the ordnance to Nottingham Castle.3 However,
the strength and the disciplined advance of the rebels showed that stronger
measures were necessary, and later in the month the king wrote to the duke
of Norfolk, who had been sent to crush the insurrection, suggesting that
considering the diversity between these and the Lincolnshire rebels they
should first be tempered by means of a letter, and if this would not serve,
then by force. Meanwhile special care was to be taken to fortify the bridges
of Nottingham and Newark and all other passages so that the rebels should
have ' nowhere any passage out of Yorkshire.' 4 Wriothesley reported this
command to Cromwell, remarking that Norfolk only had 2,000 men with
him, ' which he thought enough,' the lord marquis had no more, and with
' the Gloucestershire men ' the force would only number 5,ooo.6 The king
evidently realized how weak the forces were, and how important it was to
keep the passages over the Trent and Don safe. Thus he wrote to Suffolk,
stationed at Lincoln, concerning the fortifying of the passages. Shrewsbury
was near Doncaster," and had sent 1,200 men and six pieces to Doncaster and
Rushington Bridge to keep the passages. In case Shrewsbury should be
pressed by the rebels, or should be forced to attack them and be worsted, the
passages over the Trent must be kept, and Suffolk on receiving notice from
Norfolk of any such chance was to leave a sufficient force at Lincoln, but
was himself to repair to ' such places as shall be thought fit for the keeping
of the passages.' 7 A similar letter went to Norfolk, ordering him to with-
draw with Shrewsbury to the passages of Nottingham and Newark, if the
rebels seemed too strong, or any of Shrewbury's company should be ill-
disposed, and fortify the same ' until we can repair to you with our royal
army, having even more regard to the defence of us and of your natural
country than to any dishonour that might be spoken of such retirement, for
we assure you we would not expose our cousins of Norfolk or Shrewsbury
1 L. and P. Hen. fill, xi, 223. John Babyngton wrote to Cromwell that he and his cousin Hersy were
doing their best in the county for the king's service. (Ibid. p. 245.) Sir John Markham wrote in answer to
Cromwell's inquiry as to ' what men he could have within the forest of Sherwood by his office of chief justice
of the same, no man offended,' that he thought he might have twenty of the retinue of the town of Notting-
ham and four who filled offices granted by the king's patent. He also stated that he had given orders to the
tenants of the suppressed monasteries in Nottingham to retain themselves to no man, but be ready to serve the
king in Cromwell's retinue. (Ibid. p. 222).
' Ibid, xi, 254. » Ibid.
Ibid, xi, 315. 'Ibid, xi, 329.
' It was by this speedy march over the Yorkshire border to Doncaster that Shrewsbury saved Nottingham-
shire from being overrun by the rebels.
L. and P. Hen. Pill, xi, 339. In another letter dated 14 Nov. 1536, in which the king granted
pardon to the Lincolnshire rebels, he begged Suffolk « remember his former letter touching the fortification of
Newark and the passages there and the withdrawing of victual.' Ibid, p. 427.
334
POLITICAL HISTORY
or others with you to peril for any dominion we have on this side of Trent.' l
Concerning any promises Norfolk might make to the rebels to stay them
until his force was strengthened Henry bade him ' have such temperance as
our honour shall remain untouched by any certain grant of what you cannot cer-
tainly promise.' Under such orders as these a Norfolk could do little to satisfy
Aske's conditions of peace, and the rebel forces which had been disbanded
were called back to the standard in the middle of November and again
advanced to the Don.5 However, in the meantime all royal forces had been
kept in readiness. Thus early in November Nottingham and Newark
Castles were reported to be fortified as if for siege.* Nottingham Castle,
held by Thomas earl of Rutland,' and the knights of the county with between
400 and 500 men, was laid round with guns and stocked with provisions ;
grain was ordered to be brought in by the county. There was a new draw-
bridge at the entry to the castle, although the country round was for the
king. Like provision for grain was made at Newark, and the captains there
had decided to make a blockhouse at the bridge end and a drawbridge at
Muskham. The ' commons ' were on the king's side, but feared to be
spoiled like the men of Lincolnshire.8 The castle had three ' chesse ' of guns,
and was kept with 700 men. But Norfolk, who probably had much
sympathy with the rebels, wrote to the king on the news of the fresh
gathering at Doncaster,7 begging him to grant a general pardon. The king's
answer showed a non-relenting attitude. If the enemy was as strong and
Norfolk's position as weak as he represented it was because he had not been
* so circumspect as he should have been.' First he had desired that Shrews-
bury should not pass the Trent till he himself had joined him, taking upon
himself ' such knowledge of the county as though he had been able to stay
the passage of the rebels and thereby defeat them,' yet if Shrewsbury had not
advanced early to Doncaster ' the country had been clearly overrun and a
great number of our subjects spoiled who are now ready to serve us against
the rebels.' Then again, after promises not to consider binding any terms he
might make with the rebels, he soon ' fell to a point with them,' and dissolved
the army 'without any exploit, leaving them in force.' Now he writes that
if the king ' trust to treat or do he shall be deceived, adding beside the
report of sixty gentlemen declaring other parties not to be trusted to.' 8 A
second letter addressed to Norfolk and others runs : * We wonder you all
unite in such desperate sort as though the world would be turned upside
down if we do not agree to the petitions of the rebels especially for a free
pardon and a parliament ... if the rebels be as cankeredly disposed and in
1L. and P. Hen. VIII, xi, p. 353.
* The uncertainty of the king's conduct towards the rebels is seen in two letters from Richard Cromwell
to his father. One recounts orders to march on the morrow to Newark ; the other tells how that day they
were countermanded, then renewed one night and the next day discharged. 'Thus the Council do and
undo, for they know not what determination the king has taken with them in the north." Ibid. pp. 412, 416.
1 Ibid, xi, 450. ' Ibid, pp. 415, 465.
'Thomas earl of Rutland in a letter to Cromwell dated 10 November, 1536, states that 'lying at
Nottingham Castle is very chargeable.' At Doncaster his own money, and that he had of his friends, was
almost spent, and the duke of Norfolk sent him £500, which he delivered part to Peter Mewtes for conveying
up gunners, part to the masters of the ordnance here for gunners, part to posts about Nottingham and
Newark, and to divers gentlemen for fortifying fords beside Doncaster, so that he has little over .£300 left.
He has daily to lay out money on the castle, and doubts whether he will receive his rents in Yorkshire — a
great part of his living — this year or not. He therefore begs Cromwell move the king for money.
6 Lord Burght and the captains of Lincolnshire had seized the people's harness in the country round.
' L. and P. Hen. Vlll, xi, 494. " Ibid.
335
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
as good a readiness as you write we marvel that neither you our cousin of
Shrewsbury have been so diligent in viewing and fortifying the fords of the
Don as we desired in former letters, nor that you our cousin of Norfolk and
our admiral have devised upon the same since your arrival, knowing that we
had the doing thereof so much at heart. . . If by your negligence the rebels
should . . . cross the Don we should think ourselves ill served.'1 Finally,
however, the king agreed to Norfolk's request, pardon was promised, and
the rebel forces disbanded. During the next year the earl of Shrewsbury
was rewarded for his prompt measures to quell the rebellion by a grant of
the lands and site of the lately suppressed monastery of Ruffbrd in the county.*
The reigns of Edward VI and Mary seem to have furnished little
towards the political history of the county which, on the whole, con-
formed to the religious changes and thus had small share in the religious
rebellions that were rife during these years for religion's sake. In Eliza-
beth's reign, when the north was disaffected, Nottingham seems to have
remained loyal. Thus in 1569 the sheriff reported to the council that
Nottingham was quiet, and that many in the county had subscribed to the
observance of the Statute of Uniformity.*
In 1562 Lord Robert Dudley was ordered to make preparations for a
meeting at Nottingham between Queen Elizabeth and Queen Mary of
Scots. Tilts were to be set and warning given to all lusty young knights
to show feats of arms.* A letter was also directed in July to the sheriff
of Nottinghamshire ordering him, since the queen had determined to
meet the queen of Scots at Nottingham on 3 September next, ' bothe whose
traines will amount to 4,000 personnes,' to repair * to Nottingham, calling
unto him as well the most experte and skilfull gentlemen of that shire
as of the confynes of the shires adjoining,' and there prepare for the
victualling of the train of the queen of Scots.' There still exists a scheme
of devices ' to be shewed before the Queen's Majesty by way of maskinge at
Nottingham Castell after the meeting of the Queen of Scots,' but these
devices were set aside 8 since the meeting was eventually postponed.7
As a contrast to this suggestion of pageantry comes a tale of ' most lewd
and foule parties and disorders committed in that county ' in the years 1592
and 1593. The riots seem to have been caused by the erection of weirs
upon the River Trent, and the rioters among other things defaced the coach
of Sir Thomas Stanhope, and set up ' vile pictures ' of the earl of Shrewsbury,
the owners of the weirs.8 Orders came from the council to the sheriff
and justices of the county to seize and examine all suspected persons and
imprison them without bail. A few months later came a censure from the
council because the justices, in spite of the late commands, by their ' wilful
negligence and partiality,' had shown contempt of justice and Her Majesty's
commands rather than ' yealded any show of care ' in the performance of
their duties.*
But for Nottinghamshire, as for many other counties, the history of
Elizabeth's reign with its intricate foreign policy resolves itself for the most
1 L. and P. Hen. viit, xi, 494 'Ibid, xii, pt. ii, 350.
' Cal. S. P. Dom. 1547-80, pp. 346, 350. « Ibid. p. 202.
* Jcti of P. C. vii, 1 10. • Lansd. MS. v, No. 38. Camden, Annals for 1562, p. 60.
' 4cti of P. C. vii, 1 14. 8 Ibid, xxiv, 77. • Ibid. 267.
336
POLITICAL HISTORY
part into a long list of muster rolls. In the critical years before the Spanish
Armada, when England's safety seemed to rest on such slender defences,
English forces had to be sent to give Elizabeth's half-hearted aid to the Lords
of the Congregation against the French faction in Scotland, to the Nether-
landers against the French, and to the French against the Spaniards. In 1559
a levy of 200 men was ordered from Nottinghamshire to march to Berwick
to help in the siege of Leith.1 From Nottingham itself went forty-two able
men, of whom ten were archers and thirty-one bill men, the latter having
twelve 'harnesses' between them.3 Again, in 1573, when the massacre of
St. Bartholomew made definite action on Elizabeth's part a necessity, fresh
musters were ordered from the town of Nottingham to advance to Edinburgh
for the help of the king's party.3
The failure of her shifting policy and the events of 1576 drove the
queen into negotiations with the Low Countries, and in accordance with her
promise of help fresh musters were ordered throughout the country in 1577.*
In April of that year the council wrote to the commissioner of trustees for
Nottinghamshire concerning the training of the number of men appointed,
and ' signefieing Her Majestie's pleasure that fiftie shalbe rebated.' 5 Further
commissions were issued in 1580 and 1581, when 100 men from Nottingham-
shire were ordered to help in the suppression of the rebels in Ireland.'
From this time until the Spanish Armada had become a thing of the
past all energies were concentrated on preparations for defence against the
threatened attack of Spain. Thus in 1580 musters were taken ' not to charge
men in any foreign service,' but to ascertain the strength of the realm in case
of any rebellion or invasion.7 A change seems to have been made in the list
of horsemen to be maintained by the county of Nottingham. The rate of
assessment for the subsidy of that year was two light horse from land worth
^Tio, a lance and a light horse from land worth £20, a lance and two light
horse from land worth £30, and two lances and two light horse from land
worth £40. 8 The gentlemen of the county were required to attend a muster
at Newark in January, 1581, and those 'expected to show horses' were
sixty-four in number.9 Several pleas for exemption were put forward.
Sir John Byron wrote to the lord-lieutenant that as he was now sheriff of
Lancashire he trusted he would not be ' charged in Nottinghamshire.' 10 Sir
Francis Willoughby stated that he could not provide the lances and horsemen
and their furniture by the time appointed ' because the county yields not the
same upon the sudden,' but would send two lances and two light horse.11
Edward Stanhope petitioned that ' being a younger brother and having no
residence in Nottinghamshire,' he should be excused from providing a demi-
lance and a light horse.13 In January, 1588, the beginning of the critical
year, the earl of Rutland, with the consent of the gentlemen of Nottingham-
shire, decided that the county should furnish 1,400 footmen of whom 400
were to be selected at once.13 The quota originally required from the county
Hist. MSS. Com. Rep. xii, pt. iv. vol. i, 71.
Ibid. p. 70. * Acts of P. C. viii, 107.
Hist. MSS. Com. Rep. xii, pt. iv, vol. i, 1 12. * Acts of P. C. ix, 335.
Ibid, xiii, 45. Hut. MSS. Com. Rep. xii, pt. iv. vol. i, 1 19. 7 Ibid. p. 125.
Ibid. p.. 123. ' Ibid. p. 124.
10 Ibid. p. 125. " Ibid. " Ibid.
13 The numbers for Nottinghamshire according to the musters of 1574 and 1575 are omitted in Peck's
Desiderata Curiosa. See vol. i, liber ii, 75.
i 337 43
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
was 2,000, but since the earl had abated 600 from this number the gentlemen
of the shire promised ' to persuade all persons able to do so, over and above
their contributions, to provide themselves with private armour and weapons for
their own furniture.' The earl was to be informed of all persons who were
of the ability, and refused to furnish themselves as aforesaid.1 Fresh orders
were issued in May, 1589, 'for musters and getting in readiness of horsemen,
footmen, pioneers, powder, matches, and such like, and for the maintenance
of the beacons.' Also ' to maintain the peace in those parts and to suppress
all riots and rebellion.'8 The earl of Shrewsbury wrote to his brother-in-law
Sir John Manners concerning these musters that there might be ' default in
the selected bands of footmen ' and thus he hoped that Sir John and some of
the justices would view them before the day originally fixed. The greatest
want he thought would be of powder and match.3
After the success of 1588 England turned to give help to France since
Henry of Navarre was now king. In June, 1591, an army of 3,000 men was
to be sent to Normandy * for the succour of the French kinge,' and of these
a contingent of 150 was ordered from Nottingham to be shipped at Hull.4
In July an order was sent to the mayor of Nottingham that the town of
Nottingham should contribute ' towards the furnishing of the armour and
weapon and other necessary and incident thinges and charges for those
nombers now to be leavied in that countie.' 5 Recruits to the number of fifty
were required from the county in August of the next year for the ' aid of the
French kinge in Britaigni.' 6 Five of these recruits seem to have been
unwilling to serve abroad and to have ' runn away from their generall at
the place where they should have embarked.' They with others who had
deserted from various counties were to be committed to prison and punished
as ' shalbe thought agreable with the qualitie of their offence. ' 7 Levies were
again ordered for service in Ireland in June, 1 594, and forty foot and two horse
were required from Nottinghamshire.8 Concerning these it was reported
that Nicholas Hamerton and John Elvas had shown themselves ' back-
ward and undutyfull ' in service and were ordered accordingly to appear
before the council.9 In March, 1595, the forty footmen were ordered to be
sent to Ireland, ' sorted with their armor, weapons, and other furniture as
before prescribed, that is one half of the whole to be shott, whereof one-fourthe
parte to be muskettes, the other half of the whole to be armed with corselettes
and pikes savinge some few halbertes.' Besides these fourteen, others were to
be kept in readiness for future service.10 A new levy of 100 men was ordered
from the county for service in Ireland in 1598," and a further levy of £120
for ' the provyding of fower light horse.' Concerning the raising of the latter
the council wrote to the high sheriff and commissioners censuring ' the back-
ward and obstinacy of them whose abilities are known to be of suche as they
have no cause to pretend any excuse (for refusing payment) but of a perverse
disposition.'1 In June, 1600, came a new requirement of fifty foot from the
county for Ireland. The choice of 'serviceable and sufficient' men was
emphasized and a special warning given against the ' evill choise ' of ' lewd and
dissolute persons,' such as those who ' contynewallie either runne awaie before
1 Hist. MSS. Cam. Rep. xii, pt. iv. vol. i, 235. ' Ibid. p. 272. ' Ibid.
4 Acts of P. C. xxi, 221. 5 Ibid. • Ibid, xxiii, 135.
' Ibid. p. 214. o Ibid, xxv, 6. ' Ibid.
10 Ibid. 48, 263. " Ibid, xxviii, 609. " Ibid, xxx, 67.
338
POLITICAL HISTORY
they come to embarque or abandon their service very soone after comming
into Ireland.' Special conditions were also made as to the arming and
apparelling of the soldiers.1 Later in the same year came a fresh demand for
fifteen men from the county to proceed from Chester to Lough Foyle in the
north of Ireland. As there had been moderation used in the number
demanded so Her Majesty had like regard in the ' arming and apparrelling ' of
the men ' to deminishe the charge of the county,' and therefore it should
suffice that they were furnished with ' harquebuses, murrions, bandolyers, and
Turkey swords with especiall good baskett hiltes,' while for their apparel they
must have ' well lyned cassockes,' and must be provided with ' hose and
shooes,' while for their coats there should be the ordinary government
allowance of 4^. the piece.3
Meanwhile the government was also occupied in seeing that the home
forces of the country were properly mustered and equipped. Thus, early in
1595, a letter was addressed to the mayor and burgesses of Nottingham,
requiring that the commissioners for musters for that shire should ' take view
of soch able men and souldiers as that towne hath heretofore enrolled and
prepared, and see them trayned with the rest of the shire.' s This, the letter
expressly stated, was not meant to be an infringement on the liberties of the
burgesses, but in order that a true certificate might be sent to the council of
the state of all the forces in the county.* Special care was advised in 1596
that the leadership of the Nottingham trained bands should not be committed
to any ' Recusant in any sort.' 6 Certificates of the musters were sent to the
council in June, i 596, and were acknowledged by a letter thanking the sheriff
and commissioners for their pains and ' prayeinge and requiringe ' them that
as they had taken ' good order with the footbandes for change of their armes 6
.... and for supplie of their defectes,' so they would ' take a better view
of the horses .... the nomber whereof we are sorie to fynde decayed.' 7
Concerning the provision of powder, match, and bullets to remain ' in
stoare ' in the county, the council advised of powder, 1,600 Ib. weight ; of
match, 400 Ib. weight ; of bullets, i,6oolb. or thereabouts.8 A general order
to increase all stores of powder, match, and bullet came in November, 1596,
on account of ' the great preparacions the king of Spain doth make,' together
with another command that all the inrolled numbers of the county, both of
horse and foot, should be again viewed and mustered.9 Although Notting-
hamshire is not included in the great list of musters of Elizabeth's reign,10 a
paper, compiled about 1607—8, gives the total number of ' able men ' available
from the county at 4,000. Of these 1,500 were armed men, 100 were
pioneers, 18 were demi-lances, and 100 light horse.11
The reign of James I, and the early years of Charles I carry on the long
list of musters.1* In 1621 the commissioners reported that the Nottinghamshire
I Acts ofP.C. xxviii, 412-6. ' Ibid. 790, 796-?.
3 The proportion furnished by the town seems to have been sixteen trained soldiers and twenty-four
bowyers, maintained by private individuals. Rec. of Bora. ofNott.
4 Acts ofP.C. xxv, 9. > Ibid. p. 41 1.
* A general attempt was being made to convert ' the bowes . . . unto callyvers and muskettes.' See
ibid. 27. 'Ibid. p. 462. 8 Ibid. 9 Ibid. 292-5.
10 See Peck, Desiderata Curiosa, vol. i, liber ii, 75 ; and Ordinances of the Royal Household (Soc. Antiq.).
II Hist. MSS. Com. Rep. on MSS. of Lord Montagu of Beaulieu, 8 1.
" Levies were constantly needed for foreign service, as in 1625, when 150 men were raised in the county.
Cal. S.P. Dom, 1625-6, 46) ; and again in 1627, when 100 soldiers were required for the service of the king
of Denmark (ibid. 284).
339
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
bands, both trained and untrained, were in good condition, except that the
horse were lessened by the creation of some barons who claimed exemption,
as did some of the king's servants.1 In 1622 the bands were ordered to be
ready for instant service, and to suppress riots if any should occur.3 Three
years later the store of powder in the county was considered insufficient,8 and
in 1626 William, Viscount Mansfield, wrote to Secretary Conway that in
Nottinghamshire, although the ' Muscatires ' were reasonably well ' for pikes
and corslets, there were not above six in the whole shire right as they should
be.' * He also reported that he had ' taken his own credit ' to supply the
deficiencies of the county musters, and promised to do his utmost to procure
a benevolence from the county, but feared they would be governed by * ill
precedents and factions, the dregs of the last Parliament.' 6
Already, indeed, the county as a whole was beginning to revolt against
the illegal schemes fashioned to meet the financial difficulties of the Stuarts.
In January, 1626, Sir Gervase Clifton had reported concerning the forty-five
loans demanded under the Privy Seal that he had received amounts to £500
from thirty-four persons. Five persons (assessed together at £100) had been
silent or refused, and six others (assessed together at £90) had sent excuses.6
Again, in September, 1626, the forced loan was met by a refusal of 'the
people in general, save a few whose offer amounted to £70 .... to give
to His Majesty otherwise than by Parliament, which they alleged to be the
ordinary way.'7 However, in February, 1627, the commissioner for the
loan reported that, though the country at first was ' not a little perplexed at
the height of the demand, and the manner of it as not being included in
Parliament,' it had ultimately been persuaded to submit ' on allowance of
certain exceptions and the giving of time.' e Moreover, the gentlemen and
others of the town of Nottingham ' willingly assented to the loan,' and pro-
mised 'to pay down half at once (i.e. .£129),' and the residue in three
months.' 10 Yet, though the county had yielded, there was a general simmering
of discontent,11 and this, added to the ravages of the plague, in 1630 and
1 Cal. S.P. Dom. 1619-23, 262. ' Ibid. 427. 'Ibid. 1625-6, 377.
4 Cal. S.P. Dom. 1625-6, 406. * Ibid.
6 S.P. Dom. Chas. I, xix, No. 21. Of the latter George J.iques petitioned that he had no land but a
poor cottage worth 4O/. a year ; that he lived upon a farm which, with a high rent, was scarcely worth
£30 per annum, yet was the cheapest of his means, as for the estate and goods inherited from his uncle,
brother, and mother there were at the most but £1,000, and of this he had not a sixth. Added to this slender-
ness of estate he was £200 in debt, to be paid by Candlemas next. Gabriel Armestreye made the quaint
excuse, ' not forged to avoid it (the loan), but most true,' that he had great expenses since he had ' twelve
children living, and more than one hundred children and children's children alive and dead.' George Abell
had too little money for himself and family since he had no land, having lately sold it, no house of his
own, and many children. Alexander Stowe was already overwhelmed with many debts he could not pay,
and his lands, 'not being above £15 per annum,' he had a year ago conferred on his son in marriage,
half in possession, half in reversion. Thomas Grantham wrote, ' I presume by this time you take notice
that Mrs. Sacheverill hath changed her name, so as wee must both entreate you to make a faire excuse
on our behalfe. And in so doing I shalbe reddye to performe the like kindness to any of yor freindes
in Lincolnshire.' Richard Welshe wrote that about four years ago he had bestowed most of his estate on his
eldest son in marriage, and had since had losses, ' the vallew of two hundred pounds in cattle and other
sheepe, beinge by trade a butcher, by reason whereof I am greatly impoverished in my estate.'
' Ibid. p. 434. ' Cal. S.P. Dom. 1627-8, 65. • Ibid. 338. I0 Ibid. 53.
" This is seen in connexion with the muster levies of 1 63 3. The earl of Newcastle reported many defects
and many refractory persons in the county. Thomas Flower, of Askham, was especially censured since he had
refused to ' show his arms ' with ' such sauciness ' that if some course ' were not taken to reform him his
Majesty's service would much suffer.' He had also ' denied to compound for knighthood,' and when threatened
with a summons before the council had answered that ' he knew his way well enough thither, and it was but
buying a new pair of shoes more' (ibid. 1633-4, 28')- BX APril> l634» tnis same Thomas had been brought
to conformity by the council (ibid. p. 561).
340
POLITICAL HISTORY
1 63 1,1 made it in little humour to meet the fresh burden of ship-money. By the
levy of 1635 the county was assessed at £3,509, of which £200 was due from
Nottingham, >T 1 20 from Newark, and £30 from Retford.* At the assess-
ment no one seems to have been refractory except Gervase Markham,3 who
wrote to the sheriff taxing him with favouritism in the assessment, and com-
plaining of the great and intolerable oppression, and stating that ' if he had
been commanded to present to him his head he would as willingly have done
it.' * However, when the sheriff came to gather in the money there were
few that would pay without distraint, yet though it was ' much to his
trouble,' he got the money at last.6 In March, 1636, £3,200 of the £3, 500
charged on the county was paid over by the sheriff,* and the remainder, it was
thought, would be paid by the end of September.7 However, in January,
1637, the under-sheriff wrote that the late sheriff was 'fourscore years of age,
and little able to go through such a weighty business as ship-money.' Only
£30 then remained in arrear, and of this, Newark, he stated, was 'behind £20,
whereof the earl of Berkshire, as the late mayor telleth me, should pay £10,
and the town is poor.'8 In the assessment of 1637 the hundreds of Newark,
Hatfield, South Clay and North Clay were more heavily assessed than those of
the north division, and complained that the sheriff, Sir Francis Thornhaugh,
had favoured the part of the county in which he lived. This he disclaimed,
contending that if, as the complainants asserted, the king's service should suffer
in this matter it would be by their unjust interruption, and not by his assess-
ment.9 In March, 1638, he wrote to Secretary Nicholas that £650 had been
sent to the treasurer of the Navy, and that he hoped to send more about May
or Whitsuntide, but ' money is scarce in the county, and you know how I
have [been] troubled about the assessment. I have neither spared care nor
pains since I came down into the country. There is nobody denies, but only
desires a little more time.'10 Arrears for 1637 were still not paid by 1639.
In the May of that year Sir Francis reported that Ambrose Wade, one of the
chief constables of the hundred of Broxton, had retained £39 i6s., part of
the £250 6j. $d. charged on that hundred, and that the town of Newark was
in arrear £i I, being part of the £80 charged on the town. The mayor of
Newark and Ambrose Wade were therefore ordered to pay the said sums
within eight days or appear before the council.11 For the levy of 1638 the
sheriff Lord Chaworth reported the payment of £700 towards the full sum
required from the county, and begged that the council should suggest some
mode of procedure in cases where he had been bidden to get the ship-money
1 Thus in December, 1630, many parts of the county were 'so extremely visited in the plague' that the
musters could not be taken with safety (Cal. S.P. Dom. 1629-31, 414).
1 Cal. S.P. Dom. 1635-6, 253.
1 The Markham family seems to have been generally recalcitrant. Thus in July, 1635, Thomas Markham,
a cousin of Gervase, was accused of being in the company of a John Bensford and others the day after a
training of the horses of the county at Newark, when certain disloyal words, overheard and reported by a beggar
woman, had been spoken concerning the king. Markham was examined by the bishop of York, but denied
that such words were spoken, protesting that he himself was ready to spend his life in His Majesty's defence
(Ibid. 1635, 272). A further letter of February, 1536, states that Mr. Gervase Markham was the only person
in the county who was refractory (Ibid. 216). In the next month he was suing for pardon ' in humblest
manner that his heart can devise or a delinquent poor prisoner . . . express himself.' (Ibid. 1635—6, 290).
4 Cal. S.P. Dom. 1635-6, II. 6 Ibid. p. 190. ' Ibid. 268.
7 Ibid. 1636, 92. ' ' Ibid. p. 1 86.
9 Ibid. 1637-8, 43, 159, 184. 10 Ibid. 327.
" Ibid. 1639, 241. However, in 1640, the sheriff for that year signified that Ambrose Wade was 'dead
intestate and of small estate.' Ibid. 1640,244.
341
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
if he could, while the men who bade him get it kept their gates and fences
so well maintained that ' no distress could be drawn out but by force.' l
Earlier in the year he sent to the council a petition presented by the poor
inhabitants of Newark, complaining of ' being overrated towards the business
of shipping.' They pleaded that because of the smallness of their trade, the
poorness of the people, and the removal of ' gentlemen and able men who
formerly dwelt there and contributed to the taxes,' the levy of £45 towards
ship-money was more than the weak estate of the town could support.* The
council required the sheriff to examine the allegations, and if the town were
overcharged then the proportion was to be ' eased,' but what was taken off
was to be levied in the county elsewhere, ' which is either too easily rated, or
may better bear it.' * As a result Newark was eased of £4.0, which was
imposed on the rest of the county.4
Sir Thomas Williamson, sheriff for the next year, was able to collect
£600 or £700 towards the charge on the county, but spent it at a later date
in raising a garrison for the king at Newark.'
Meanwhile the attention of the king was being directed to Scotch
affairs, and already in December, 1638, and January, 1639, the lord-
lieutenants of the northern counties, Nottingham among them, had been
notified that by reason of ' the extraordinary and unexpected occasion ' at
hand they should prepare the forces and strength of their counties to prevent
such disorders as might otherwise fall on the kingdom.' An order also went
out that, owing to the great want of armourers, gunsmiths, swordmakers, and
bandoleer-makers those skilled in these trades should be allowed to set up and
exercise any of the said trades as freemen of the corporation of any of the
Nottinghamshire towns, as of all the counties of the north.7 In February,
1639, Captain Roger Bradshaw reported to Windebank concerning the
Nottinghamshire horse and foot. The footmen numbered 1,033 besides
officers, the arms of the pikemen were ' passable,' but for ' musketeers '
he had ' defected a great number by reason of the weight and length,
some weighing 18 or 20 Ibs., for no man is able to do service with
them.' The horse numbered sixty-one, and both horse and arms were
good, except a few pistols which he had ' defected.' The magazine was
2 1 lasts of powder, 2j tons of match, and 2§ tons of lead.8 In 1640, 300 foot
soldiers, fifty horses, and seventeen carters were required from the county, * •
and the lord-lieutenant promised they should be in readiness at time and
place appointed. The numbers actually sent were 300 men and three
drummers.10 Although the war with Scotland was nominally ended
by the Treaty of Ripon, the strain it had involved on the revenue made
the Long Parliament a necessity, and with the Long Parliament came the
Civil War.
The period of the Civil War was one of the most eventful in the history
of Nottinghamshire. There was a strong royalist element in the county, and
1 Cal. S.P. Dam. 1639, '5°- ' Ibid. 1638-9, 234, and 1639, '34-
Ibid. 1639, '34- 4 Ibid. 1639-40, 465.
4 Pror. of Committee for Advance of Money, i, 90. In March, 1 662, Sir Thomas was ' discharged £500 ship-
money levied in co. Notts, during his shrievalty, and by him paid in 1 648 for the use of the garrison of Newark.'
Col. S.P. Dam. 1661-2, 312.
•Ibid. 1638-9, pp. 155, 307. 'Ibid. p. 373.
•Ibid. 444. 'Ibid. 1640, p. 272. "Ibid. p. 544.
342
POLITICAL HISTORY
thus Mrs. Hutchinson writes that whereas ' some counties were in the begin-
ning so wholly for the Parliament that the king's interest appeared not in
them ; some were so wholly for the king that the godly, for those generally
were the Parliament's friends, were forced to forsake their habitations and
seek other shelters : of this sort was Nottinghamshire.' l All the nobility
and gentry and their dependents were generally for the king, and among
them were the earl of Newcastle, the earl of Kingston, who ' a few months
stood neuter,' until at length ' his fate drew him to declare himself absolutely
on the king's side,' Lord Chesterfield, Lord Chaworth, the earl of Clare, who
was ' very often of both parties, and . . . never advantaged either,' Sir John
Byron, and Sir John Savill. Of the 'parliament men ' Mr. Sutton, afterwards
Lord Lexington and Sir Gervase Clifton ' forsook the Parliament, went to the
king and executed his commission of array.' Others who were firm to the
Parliament were Mr. Hutchinson and Mr. Henry Ireton.2 Knowing the
strength of his party in the county the king was quick to visit first Newark
and then Nottingham and gather his forces. In July, 1642, he convened a
meeting at Newark of all the principal gentry and landowners of the county,
and declared that whereas he went to other places 'to confirm and undeceive'
his subjects, he had come there only to ' thank and encourage ' them.3 A
few days later he went on to Nottingham, where he held a similar meeting
and summoned the trained bands which were arrayed under Sir Gervase
Clifton.4 The mayor, Alderman James, a parliament man — ' a very honest
bold man with no more but a burgher's discretion ' 6 — had refused twice to
go to York at the king's command, and had not published the king's
proclamations, and the king, though he accepted the mace, ' gave him no
hand to kiss.' 8 By 1 2 August the king was again at York, where he
published his proclamation requiring the aid and assistance of all his ' well-
affected subjects north of the Trent . . . for the suppression of the rebellion
and the protection of his subjects from that slavery and insolvency which
threatened them.'7 By 17 August he was at Newark, the next day at
Southwell, and the next at Nottingham, where he reviewed the cavalry.
On Monday, 22 August, came the formal declaration of war with the
setting up of the royal standard at Nottingham. A letter printed in
Remarkable Passages from Nottingham gives the graphic account of an eye-
witness : ' His Majesty came into the castle yard accompanied with the
prince-duke Prince Robert (Rupert) and Maurice his brother, the duke of
Richmond, and divers others, courtiers and cavaliers, and finding out the
highest pointed hill in the yard from whence it might be perspicuous the
standard was brought in and there erected. At which time all the courtiers
and spectators flung up their caps and whooped crying : " God save King
Charles and hang up the Roundheads " ! and so whooped the king to his
lodgings. After which the standard was removed to the highest tower of
the castle, where it hangs blowing, and so must till the king advanceth his
1 Mrs. Hutchinson, Memoirs of Col. Hutchinson (Bohn ed.), p. 116.
' Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit, pp. 117-8.
5 Rushworth, Hist. Coll. iii, vol. i, 653.
4 Truths from Nott. and Leic. (B.M. Pamphlets, 669, fol. 657).
'Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 13*.
* Truths from Natt. and Leic. April, 1642 (B.M. Pamphlets, 669, fol. 657).
'Clarendon, Hist, of Great Rebellion, ii, 275.
343
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
camp forward ; then it removes with him.' l Drums were beating about
Nottingham for volunteers for the king, troops of horse were coming to be
billeted on the county, and already rapine and spoil was being committed
about Nottingham ; gentlemen's nouses were ransacked, and ' one Master
Needham's oune cart ' was made to ' bring away to Nottingham bedding,
linen, pewter, butter, cheese, and other things out of his house,' because he
was ' accounted a Roundhead.' *
Three days after the setting up of the standard, the king by the advice
of his council sent a message to both Houses of Parliament hoping to find
* some remedy to prevent the miseries which are ready to overwhelm the
whole nation by a civil war,' and proposing a treaty between himself and
Parliament. 8 The Houses answered that the king by his proclamations and
declarations against Parliament and by setting up his standard had put ' the
two Houses of Parliament and in them the whole kingdom ' out of his
protection, and until His Majesty should recall the proclamation and take
down the standard the Houses for ' the good and safety of the kingdom '
could give him no answer. The king answered that he never had declared
the Houses traitor, nor set up the standard against them, and if they would
revoke all their proclamations made against his party he would do the same
and would take down the standard.4 The Parliament unmoved returned the
same answer as before, and declared that the arms they had been forced to
take up should not be laid down until His Majesty should withdraw his
protection from such persons as had been voted delinquents by both Houses.'
Meanwhile on 30 August the men of Nottinghamshire presented a petition
to the king, ' humbly imploring his sacred Majesty to returne and joyne
with both his Houses of Parliament,' and to take down the standard. There-
upon His Majesty ' struck with clemency immediately caused his standard to
be taken downe . . . but the Cavalliers were not a little moved at the happy
success this Petition found, wherefore some certain of them being ful of gall
and spleen, and withall taking a cloak for their wicked intention, saying that
the Petitioners were rather traytors than subjects . . . alleadging that his
Prerogative was dipt, and ere they would suffer it their lives (as for their
fortunes they had none) should be sacrificed to redeem his wrongs, in such ,
like passions sought out for the Petitioners . . . and would have fallen upon
them, but they . . . sent to the mayor . . . intreating that some of the
1 (B.M. Pamphlets, 669, fol. 675). Remarkable Passages from Nott. Letter from a Gentleman neere Nctt. to a
Friend in London. The writer goes on to describe the standard as ' a long pole like a maypole, painted red on the
upper end, whereof hangs a large silk flag (in form of a scutcheon) with a red crosse and two lyons passant upon
two crownes.' He also tells how ' Prince Robert ' (Rupert) was next day made general of the horse and how
the king declared that whoso would go that afternoon with the prince against Coventry and Warwick ' it
should be acceptable service.' A rather different account of the event is given in another description. There
the writer says that the standard was ' taken out of the castle and carried into a field a little on the back side of
the castle wall.' Of the standard he says that ' the likeness of the standard is much of the fashion of the City
streamers used at the Lord Mayor's Show, having about twenty supporters, and is to be carried the same
way ; on the top of it hangs a bloody flag, the king's arms quartered, with a hand pointing to the crowne
which stands above, with this motto : " Give to Caesar his due." ' A True and Exact Relation of the Manner
of Hit Majesty's Setting uf his Standard at Nottingham.
' This account is, of course, written from a partial point of view. The writer of the letter has been
thought to be Col. Hutchinson, who was certainly in Nottingham at the time. See Mrs. Hutchinson's
Memoirs of Col. Hutchinson.
' His Majesty's Gracious Message . . . sent from Nottingham, etc. (B.M. Pamphlets, E. 1 1 6, No. 2).
4 B.M. Pamphlets, E. 116, No. 2.
' Clarendon, Hist, of Great Rebellion, ii, 308.
344
POLITICAL HISTORY
Trained Bands should be in a readinesse to quell all uproars if it chanced
that the Cavalliers should bee over busy.' l
There was thus another side to the history of the king's cause in
Nottinghamshire. Though the gentry of the shire were on his side,
Nottingham townsmen and the freeholders were against him,3 and Clarendon
reports how the king ' found the place much emptier than he thought the
fame of his standard would have suffered it to be,' for ' at Nottingham
(besides some few of the train-bands which Sir John Digby, the active shrieve
of that county, drew into the old ruinous castle there) there were not of foot
levied for the service yet 300 men.'8 All the strength on which the king
could depend was his horse, about 800 in number, now at Leicester with Prince
Rupert, and Essex, with the parliamentary forces, was at Northampton,
ready, it seemed, to march on Nottingham. But ' God blinded his enemies
so that they made not the least advance towards Nottingham.' * By the end of
August recruits were coming in from Yorkshire, Staffordshire, Lincolnshire,
Shropshire, and Cheshire, and the hopes of the royal party were rising. Yet
Nottingham ' seemed not a good post for His Majesty to stay in,' and on
13 September he marched from Nottingham to Derby. Thus Sir Edward
Nicholas wrote to Sir Thomas Roe that the king was on that day ' setting
forth with his army ... to join with 5,000 foot and 400 horse, which are
raised for the king in Wales and the borders. The king's army is much
increased within these eight days, and near 2,000 arms have been hither
brought in from this and the adjacent counties.' 5
Meanwhile musters were gathering under the parliamentary commission
of array. Three colonels had been nominated : Sir Francis Thornhaugh,
Sir Francis Molyneux, and Francis Pierrepoint. Of these Sir Francis
Molyneux utterly refused service : Sir Francis Thornhaugh raised a regiment
of horse, and Colonel Pierrepoint a regiment of foot, of which Mr. John
Hutchinson became lieutenant-colonel. Colonel Pierrepoint seems to have
been very half-hearted, for Mrs. Hutchinson tells how he was six weeks
before he could be persuaded ' to put on a sword or to enlist any men, which
at length he did of substantial honest townsmen.' 8 With the beginning of
the association of the counties after the battle of Edgehill, Nottinghamshire
was placed with Leicestershire and other counties under Lord Grey, of Groby.
Then the royalist gentry, headed by Lord Chaworth, ' finding an opposition
they expected not,' seem to have made some vain effort to come to terms
with the 'parliament men.'7 In December, 1642, a meeting of the corpora-
tion of Nottingham and ten gentlemen of the county was held at the
guildhall, and an agreement was made to invite the gentlemen of the county
1 B.M. Pamphlets, E. 1 16, No. 3. Nott. Pet. to the King.
' Mrs. Hutchinson says : ' Although the town was generally more malignant (i.e. Royalist) than wcll-
affected, yet they cared not to have the cavalier soldiers quarter with them, and, therefore, agreed to defend
themselves against any force which should come against them ; and being called hastily together as the
exigence required, about 700 listed themselves, and chose Mr. George Hutchinson for their Captain ' (Memoirs of
Col. HutMnion,ed. Bohn, 132). The ill effects on the king's cause of the unscrupulous billeting of the soldiers
in the town is shown by the petition of 1642, presented to Parliament by the townsmen. William, earl of
Newcastle, the lord-lieutenant, had ' withdrawn himself, with mischievous accomplices, to his own house in
Nottingham, billeting his cavaliers and Papistical soldiers in the houses of the most substantial persons of that
county,' who were forced to quit their houses and goods, or suffer the indignities imposed on them by ' those
enemies of God and the Commonwealth in the ferocity of their barbarous dispositions' (B.M. Pamphlets,
E. 84, No. 17). ' Clarendon, Hist, of Great Rebellion, ii, 293. 4 Ibid. p. 299.
6 Cal. 5. P. Dom. 1642-3, 389. ' Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 139. * Ibid. p. 140.
1 345 44
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
to join the townspeople for the defence of the town of Nottingham. l Those
who would not threw themselves into Newark, where preparations for a
strong defence were being made. Works were also begun round Notting-
ham, and from this time the progress of the Civil War in the county was to
resolve itself into a struggle between the two rival garrisons of Nottingham
and Newark. Nottingham was as important to Parliament as ' a considerable
pass to the north ' as Newark was to the king, yet early in 1 643 the ' coldness '
of Colonel Pierrepoint, and the growing ' disaffection ' of the town, made it
seem as though it could only with difficulty be preserved for Parliament.
However, in February, 1642—3, the garrison decided to join with Lincoln
and Derby and attack Newark, since ' it would be easier to prevent Newark
from being made a fortified garrison than to take it when it was so.' * The
forces from Nottingham and Derby were to advance on one side, those of
Lincoln on the other. According to the parliamentary version Newark
would have been forced to surrender had it not been for the treachery of the
Lincolnshire commander, John Ballard, who, ' decayed in his family,' and
owing his education to many of the royalist gentry within Newark, determined
to cast aside the Parliament cause ' rather than ruin his old benefactors.' 8 He
refused to attack the town at the right time, and probably betrayed the
enemy's movements to the Newarkers, so that they prepared an ambuscade to
intercept them. When the forces of Nottingham and Derby had come,
being 1,000 strong, horse, foot, and dragoons, they attacked the town on one
side, beat the Newarkers from the works, and entrenched themselves.
Captain King, of the Lincolnshire forces, attacked the other side of the town,
and had ' taken a street, cut up a chain, and placed a " drake " in a house,'
when Ballard ordered him to retreat, and thereupon the whole force of
Newark fell on the entrenched Nottingham and Derby forces. The latter
fought bravely until a Lincolnshire trooper, sent by Ballard, came and bade
them fly for their lives, or else they were lost men.'* The royalist version
tells how the Nottingham and Derby regiments ' discharged against the
towne from eleven of the clocke at noone untill six at night, but with more
courage than successe.' The attack on the other side of the works failed
completely, and the enemy retired, whereupon the governor attacked the
Nottingham and Derby forces, and dislodged the enemy. * There were
killed of the king's side in this brave repulse but one man onely, a common
souldier of the garrison, and not many hurt. But of the rebels were slaine no
fewer than 200 men and many wounded, whereof the chiefe was Colonel
Ballard, and no meane one neither.' 6
For the next few months Nottingham seems to have felt the effect of
the general royalist victories throughout the north and west. Sir Richard
Byron, the new governor of Newark, brought all the zealous loyalty of his
family to the help of the Newark garrison ; Lord Chaworth, the earl of
Chesterfield, and others had left Newark, and fortified their several houses
in the royalist cause. The forces at Nottingham only numbered about
1,000 men, 'but at Whitsuntide they were reinforced, and the numbers
1 Rec. of the Bora. ofNott. v, 207. * Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 143. * Ibid. p. 144.
4 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 143—5.
' A Brief Relation of the Remarkable Occurrences In the Northern Parts (B.M. Pamphlets, E. 73).
* The queen wrote to Charles from Newark that ' all the force Parliament had in those parts was only
1 ,000 men in Nottingham.'
346
POLITICAL HISTORY
raised to about 5,000 or 6,000 by the gathering at Nottingham of the forces
of the northern midlands for the rescue of the Fairfaxes from Newcastle's
' Popish army.' l Owing chiefly to the conduct of the younger Hotham,
who was found to be in correspondence with the Newark garrison, there
seems to have been much disorder in the town, and finally, probably by
Cromwell's influence, Lord Grey was superseded by Sir John Meldrum a in the
command of the associated forces. Sir John Meldrum being called off with
the bulk of the Nottinghamshire forces to the relief of Gainsborough in July,
1643, t^ie town was again in a desperate state, since only a few townsmen
remained to guard both town and castle. These Colonel Hutchinson, who
had been made governor of the castle the month before, ordered into the castle,
since they were not sufficient in number to guard the works round the town,
and ordered the fourteen guns upon the works to be brought up also. This
action seems to have aroused much opposition, for the townsmen, since ' their
houses, families, and estates were exposed, began to envy, then to hate the
castle, as grieved that anything should be preserved when all could not.'
Finally, out of the whole town and the four companies that remained
under Colonel Pierrepoint only about 300 men were found to garrison
the castle.' The defenceless state of the town naturally gave an oppor-
tunity to the garrison at Newark. They issued out in various parties,
and swept the county round up to the very walls of Nottingham. On
1 8 September, 1643, Sir Richard Byron effected an entry into the town,
and for five days was garrisoned in the old church of St. Nicholas. Failing
to make any impression on the castle, he prepared to evacuate, but was
attacked by a sally party from the castle. He thereupon retreated to
the Trent bridge, and remained entrenched there until, hearing that re-
inforcements were on the way to Nottingham, he silently marched back
to Newark.*
The next month brought the reinstatement of Parliament in the north
with the defeat of Lord Newcastle by Fairfax, and the taking of Gainsborough
by the earl of Manchester.6 Royalist hopes in the north were failing, the
treachery of the Hothams had been unavailing, ' and much about this time
(i.e. December, 1563) there fell out another remarkable passage much to His
Majesty's dishonour,' since the marquis of Newcastle ' plotted and contrived
by one Colonel Dacre to have corrupted and undermined the valiant and most
loyal governor of Nottingham Castle.' Colonel Hutchinson himself wrote to
Mr. Millington, a member of the House of Commons, that he had three
times been tempted to betray the castle, by Sir Richard Byron, by Mr. Sutton,
and by the earl of Newcastle. Ten thousand pounds and 'to be made best
1 Mercurius jiutuus, B.M. Pamphlets, E. 55, 14. Certain Informations, B.M. Pamphlets, E. 55, 4.
' Carlyle, Cromwell's Letters, i, Letter ix. Lord Grey's conduct in failing to meet with the united forces at
the appointed rendezvous is here censured by Cromwell.
3 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 155, et seq. The records of the borough for 1643 show the special
provisions made for night guard : ' Those wattchmen that are appoynted to wattche the toun nightly for the
flanckinge and strengthinge the Gentries and inner gards shalbe sworn to keepe their wattche until fower of the
clocke in the morninge, and thatt whoesoever shall depart from his garde or wattche . . . shall pay for his
fyne iis or ells in defalte thereof ... be ymprisoned . . . and xxxtie (are) to be appoynted everie nighte to
wattche oute of the severall wardes ' (Rec. of Bora. ofNott. v, 209).
4 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. pp. 176-180. Captain White and his horse returning from Lincolnshire to
Leicester came to the rescue of the governor.
* B.M. Pamphlets, E. 212. God's Arke overtopping the World's Waves, p. 7
347
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
lord in Nottinghamshire ' was the reward offered him.1 Of Lord Newcastle's
share in these transactions it is difficult to judge. Certainly if Nottingham
could have been gained before the parliamentary forces under Sir John
Meldrum and Lord Willoughby could march south the county would have
formed a royalist wedge between north and east. Since Colonel Hutchinson
could not be won over the garrison at Newark made a desperate effort to take
both town and castle by storm in January, 1643-4. Fifteen hundred horse
and foot from the garrison joined with royalist forces from the surrounding
country, and about six o'clock in the morning of 1 6 January drew near the
town from either side and forced an entry, driving back the governor and
two foot companies into the castle. They then possessed themselves of
St. Peter's Church and the houses and ' street ends ' to prevent the garrison
from sallying out. The ordnance from the castle, however, ' made a lane among
them,' and the Parliamentary horse, seeing they could do no service mounted,
took their muskets, and served on foot, and so succeeded in beating back the
enemy.8 ' In all this day's service,' Colonel Hutchinson wrote, ' we had not
any assistance from the townsmen besides those which have all this year been
in the castle with me, though I had twice summoned them to receive arms
for the defence of the town . . . but now I am in some hopes that they will
by this be brought to concur more cheerfully with me for their own defence
and that the cavaliers (though they have no cause to bray of this) will more
dearly buy their next entrance.'8 In February, 1643—4, came an account,
again from the parliamentary side, of the most ' admirable and marvellous
deliverance ' of the town and castle from a plot of the king's ' base cormorants.'
Horses laden with straw were driven by thirty cavaliers, some ' in the habits
of plain country men, others of them like unto homely country women,'
from Newcastle towards Nottingham as though going to the market ; but
the ' supposed women ' were suspected, and the ' cousening cormorants '
being detected were examined and tortured until they confessed a plot to
suddenly attack and kill the guard, and prepare the way for the horse and
foot that were following. Thus warned the Nottingham garrison issued out
and put the enemy to rout and retreat.*
Meanwhile Sir John Meldrum and Lord Willoughby had marched \
south, and by the middle of February the siege of Newark was begun.6 By f
the middle of March the garrison was nearly starved out,' and so sure was i
Parliament of a speedy end to the siege that an order went from the Com-
mittee of Both Kingdoms to the earl of Manchester on 20 March that the
Nottingham and Derby forces were to return from Yorkshire to secure their
own counties, that the footmen of Lord Willoughby, then at Newark, should
go with Sir John Meldrum to Yorkshire, and his horse to the earl of Denbigh.7
On the next day, 21 March, Prince Rupert, who when at Chester had
received orders from the king on 1 2 March to march to the relief of Newark,
B. M. Pamphlets, E. p. 104. An interesting personal note comes into this letter since Mr. Hutchinson
tells his friend 'your sonnes are both well here in the castle, and I heare your wife is so in the country :
only I hear your goods and corne are plundered.'
B. M. Pamphlets, £312. Gods' Ark overtopping the World's Waves, p. 163. * Ibid. p. 163.
4 Ibid. Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. pp. 214-5. 5 See Cai. S. P. Dom. 1644, 23.
' Yet Sir Edward Nicholas reported on 1 5 March that ' the rebels assaulted Newark in several places, but
were repulsed with loss of about 500 dead on the place, besides some of their ordnance, particularly the great
wars piece they took at Hull from my lord of Newcastle.' Ibid. p. C4-.
» ft • 1 yp- * * J\
7 Ibid. p. 63.
348
POLITICAL HISTORY
having joined Lord Loughborough at Bingham, marched to Newark early in
the morning, attacked Meldrum's forces, and relieved the town.1 On
22 March the Committee of Both Kingdoms wrote to the earl of Man-
chester bidding him send what force he could to the help of the forces
before Newark. ' We conceive if your forces come timely Prince Rupert's
army may be in the straits yours is now conceived to be.'8 A further
account of the ' unhappy condition of affairs at Newark ' was sent to Sir
William Waller,8 and Lord Denbigh and Commissary General Belire with
the Nottingham and Derby forces, as well as those of the earl of Manchester,
were reported to be marching towards those parts to hinder the royalist forces
there from ' that fruit of their victory they might hope to reap by arming
the country with those arms they had taken from our men.' * Lord Denbigh,
in a letter written 27 March, feared that the enemy would ' follow their
fortune' in the vicinity of Newark, but had the earl of Manchester's march
been swifter, and had the Nottingham forces joined with his own, this might
have been prevented.' However, letters from Prince Rupert having been
intercepted, the Committee learnt that he was ' not of such strength as he
thinks it safe to continue where he is.' '
During the summer of 1644 all the efforts of Parliament were directed
to affairs in Yorkshire, and all the strength of the associated forces was sum-
moned to the north. Newark and Nottingham were left once more to their
old antagonism, and the Nottingham garrison fared badly. Thus in June,
1644, ' divers gentlemen in Nottingham well affected to the Parliament ' sent
intelligence to the Committee of Both Kingdoms of the strength of the
enemy's garrison, while they themselves had but few horses left, and
could ' neither defend their county nor gain contributions for the necessary
maintenance of their garrison ' without the aid of the horse then with Lord
Denbigh, which for the most part had been ' raised at the charge of par-
ticular men.' The Committee therefore, ' being sensible of the great loss like
to come speedily on Nottingham for want of horses,' wrote to Lord Denbigh
ordering him to dismiss 100 of the Nottingham horse then with him and the
others as soon as he could spare them.7 The governor of Nottingham had
other difficulties to meet besides the attacks of the Newark garrison.
Although old rivalry between the town and castle was somewhat abated 8 it
had given way to a rivalry between the governor and the Committee, and
this of necessity gave an added weakness to his plans for defence.9 In July,
1644, Mr. Millington was sent by the Committee of Both Kingdoms to give
the committees both of town and castle and the honest inhabitants of the
garrison thanks for ' their undaunted courage and unwearied diligence in
the maintenance of the same,' and to ' endeavour to compose all differences
between the garrisons of the castle and town, and between the members of
the committees.'10 By November the quarrel between the governor and
the committee of Nottingham had come before the Committee of Both
1 Mercurius Aulicus, B.M. Pamphlets, £.55. * Cal. S. P. Dam. 1644, p. 66.
* Ibid. pp. 70, 75. 4 Ibid. p. 75. 5 Ibid.
6 Ibid. pp. 77, 78. ' Ibid. p. 277.
8 The townsmen had at last determined to join in their own defence, and 400 were enlisted under
' one Mr. Coates, a minister, an honest and Godly man, and Mr. Mason, an attorney, a great cavalier, but a
reverend and silent man who, for an austere knit in his brow and a grave, severe countenance, had the
reputation of a wise man.' Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 208.
9 Ibid. pp. 208-14. 10 Cal. S. P.Dom. 1644, p. 368.
349
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Kingdoms for settlement, and by its decision all the affairs of town and
castle were to be in the hands of a general committee of which Colonel
Hutchinson, Colonel Thornhaugh, the mayor of Nottingham, and others
specially named were to be members. Without the consent of the
majority in this committee no forces should be sent out, or being sent
out recalled, and no works or fortifications should be made in or about
the garrison. Especially the committee were requested to take care that
money was provided for the garrison, so that it might not suffer from
want of pay.1
Meanwhile Cromwell's victory at Marston Moor had secured thenorth,and
the parliamentary forces were available elsewhere, but it was not until the end
of the year that Fairfax suggested that some of the Scottish horse should be
sent from the northern counties to Newark, the only considerable garrison of
the enemy and the ' receptacle of all (their) flying forces.'8 During November
Fairfax received orders from the committee ' to straiten the enemy at Newark,'3
and in December he wrote that he had ordered some regiments to march to
Newark, but the place was strong and well manned and provided for some
months, and he could not spare enough forces to effect much.* By January
Newark was not taken, but some of the forces of the counties of Nottingham,
Derby, and York, that had been rendering good service in the siege under Sir
John Cell, had been withdrawn. The committee, being ' sensible of the loss
and danger ' this withdrawal entailed on Nottingham, ordered Fairfax to send
1,000 horse out of Yorkshire, and ordered Sir John Cell to send back the
1,000 he had withdrawn.5 The garrison, however, still held out, and periodi-
cally made desperate sallies, but was ' reduced to an exceeding strait for want
of provisions.'6 In March, 1645, Prince Rupert determined to relieve the
town, and sent a party of 1,500 horse under Sir Marmaduke Langdale for
that purpose.7 On the way from Leicester to Newark the relief party was
attacked by Colonel Rossiter with about 3,000 men, but succeeded in
repulsing the enemy, and marching on to Newark, was able to relieve the
town.8
Once again, therefore, Parliament was obliged to leave Newark to the
royalists, and Colonel Rossiter was ordered to march after Sir Marmaduke \
Langdale, who, when he had relieved the town, had started to meet Prince
Maurice in Cheshire, but to leave enough forces before Newark as ' may
preserve the country from spoil by the Newark garrison.' 9 A few days after
this order was countermanded, and Colonel Rossiter was ordered to take
special care of the country round Newark that none of the garrison should
' be suffered to march towards any part of the Eastern Association to disquiet
and alarm them.' 10
The march of the royal forces from Worcester across to Leicester in
April, 1645, presumably against the Eastern Association, aroused the fears of
Parliament, and early in May an order was sent to the deputy-lieutenants of
Nottingham to send 200 horse and 200 foot to join with Lincoln forces c in
case the Newark garrison should attempt to march towards the king.' u On
1 Cal. S. P.Dom. 1644-5, p. m. ' Ibid. p. 104. ' Ibid. p. 119.
4 Ibid. p. 172. * Ibid. p. 235.
6 MS. of a gentleman of the relief party, printed in 1782, quoted in Shilton, Hut. of Newark, pp. 81-91.
7 Cal. S. P. Dom. 1644-5, P- 334- * MS. above quoted.
' Cal. S. P. Dom. 1644-5, P- 34°. lo Ibid. p. 355. " Ibid. p. 478.
35°
POLITICAL HISTORY
20 May Lord Fairfax wrote to the earl of Leven that ' the Newark forces
get all horses they can possibly for a speedy march either towards the king's
forces or to raise the siege of Pontefract.' l Later in the month a rendezvous
of all the Associated Counties was appointed at Nottingham, and ' in case the
king should draw out the garrison of Newark,' Colonel Rossiter was ordered
to advance with 600 horse of Lincolnshire.3 The king's success at Leicester,
early in June, brought orders to Fairfax to pursue the royal forces, since the
king was thought to be ' able to attempt either Nottingham, Derby, or any
other garrison.' s The decisive victory of Fairfax at Naseby crushed all the
royalist hopes. The king's broken forces threw themselves into Newark,
now the only strong royalist centre, near which some of the Scotch forces
were stationed for the next three months to defend the country round against
the garrison.*
After the defeat of Goring in the west, in July, Charles advanced across
England to Newark, with about 3,000 horse and dragoons, to join with the
Newark garrison.6 In August the Committee of Both Kingdoms ordered
Major-General Poyntz to gather all the forces formerly appointed from
Staffordshire, Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, and Lincolnshire, and from the
Eastern Association, and taking them under his charge ' take all advantage
against the Newark garrison.' ' Further, he was ordered to follow the king
with his Yorkshire horse, while the Committee for War at York was ordered
to reinforce him so as to enable him to besiege Newark. This they had
neglected, and Poyntz had been forced, for want of horse, to relieve Notting-
ham, so that Newark was left ' to infest the adjacent parts and to trouble and
alarm the quiet ' of the north unless horse and dragoons were sent quickly.7
Throughout September the country round Newark was the scene of numerous
skirmishes, but the Association forces were drawing together, and there was
great hope ' that the countrymen would come in likewise, with their muskets.'
During October news came to London that Newark was blocked up by
horse ' as well as for the present it can be.' Major-General Poyntz was in
the north with his own and the London horse, Colonel Rossiter on the other
side with his horse. The king was in the garrison with ' the two German
princes and many gentlemen of note, and not above 700 or 800 horse, and
not so many foot as there had lately been : If our brethren of Scotland were
there now they might do England and themselves good service, but God will
work his own work by what hand he pleases.' 8 In the same month was
reported ' a pretty design against Newark ; the business well carried had not
the enemy too soon gotten the alarm ; our men tugged hard for the bridge,
slew divers of the enemy, and the next day Sir Thomas Williams was
suspected to hold confederacy and dismissed the garrison.' 9 Charles was
1 Cal. S.P. Dom. 1644-5, p. 505. ' Ibid. pp. 530, 542. ' Ibid. p. 551. ' Ibid. p. 622.
* News of great disorder ' among the rebels' forces in Yorkshire decided the course of the king's march.
The gentlemen of the five northern counties expressed a wonderful alacrity and resolution to engage in the
king's service, even more frankly than . . . when he was most prosperous.' Letter from Lord Digby to
Prince Rupert. Cal. S. P. Dom, 1645-7, p. 70.
6 Ibid. p. 63. Already letters had been sent to the Committees of Derby, Notts, Stafford, Lincoln, Cam-
bridge, and Rutland, informing them that the royalist garrison was grown to greater strength at Newark by
access of force from several other reduced garrisons, and bidding them send what force they could to help in its
reduction. Ibid. pp. 35, 44.
' Ibid. B.M. Pamphlets, E. 302. Moderate Intelligencer and Mercurius Veredicus ; also Mercurius Ciricus
and The Scottish Dove (Ibid. E. 303). 8 B.M. Pamphlets, E. 307, The Scottish Dove.
* Ibid. E. 303, Continuation of Divert Remarkable Passages.
351
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
anxious to get away from Newark to join Montrose,1 being unwilling,
according to his enemies, ' to be blockt up there, and the rather the sickness
was in it' and taking advantage of the absence of General Poyntz at the siege
of Shelford House, and the withdrawal of many of the Derby and Warwick
horse to Chester,' marched out secretly with all the supplies the garrison could
afford, ' who have so extremely drained themselves to pleasure him that the
adjacent countries will now be in great quiet, and Colonel Rossiter be the
better spared to pursue him.'8 The coming of General Leslie with the
Scotch forces, to the number of 2,000 horse and 3,000 foot,4 ' to visit that
cage and catch these foul birds,' was finally planned in November, and at this
news there came daily out of Newark ' great store of men of quality who
have passes and goe home to their houses.' There were those who had ' fled
to Newark and received rents from their tenants,' and now, fearing a siege,
came out, ' that the provisions within might last longer.' 6 It was not until
December' that the Scottish forces arrived, and their commanders and the
parliamentarian officers held a council of war and agreed to storm the
bridge a mile from the town where the enemy kept guard. The attack seems
to have been successful and many royalists were killed.7 On 10 December
the Newarkers designed to blow up a bridge over the Dee, and prepared
five boats for this purpose, but one caught fire before it reached the bridge,
and warned the enemy, so that the rest were stopped.8 For the next few
weeks the Newarkers made desperate sallies but, seemingly, with indifferent
success. Thus, on 19 December, about 600 of the garrison attacked the
enemy, who caused them to retreat, but pursuing them too eagerly fell into
a royalist ambush near the town works and lost about 20 of their men.'
On another occasion the royalists fared less well. About 200 or 300 made
a sally on Colonel Rossiter's quarters, but were compelled to retreat with
the loss of many men.10 By the end of December Skipton Castle had
surrendered to Parliament, and 2,000 were sent thence to ' help the business
of Newark,' u as well as a ' great mortar piece,' which it was hoped would
' doe good execution.' 12 In January also the Committee of Both Kingdoms
wrote to the Committee at Nottingham that, all the garrisons in Yorkshire
being reduced, horse and foot could be spared for Newark,13 and the committee
of the militia of London was desired to provide 60 dragoons, to be ready at
I Cal. S. P. Dam, 1645-7, P- l6°- * B-M- Pamphlets, E. 309, The Kingdom's Weekly IntelRgencer.
* B.M. Pamphlets, E. 304, The Kingdom's Weekly Post. During Colonel Rossiter's absence in pursuit
of the king, the earl of Warwick was ordered to send Major Gibb and 800 horse of the Association to Newark
(Cal. S. P. Dem. 1645-7, p. 98). The Weekly Account for 8-15 October describes a council of war in
Newark, and how the commanders with the king ' made high propositions to the towne for horse, ammuni-
tion, arms, etc., and that what was not entirely necessary for the defence of the garrison was to be carried away
with his Majesty.' B.M. Pamphlets, E. 304.
4 Ibid. E. 313, A Diary or Exact Journal, 1 8 Dec. 1645.
4 Ibid. E. 310, The Weekly Account, Nov. 4-11, 1645.
6 The Scots had been severely censured by Parliament for the delay in their advance to Newark, ' whereby
not only the northern parts have lain all the while under an insupportable burden, but also the fairest oppor-
tunity ... for putting an end to our miseries is already slipped out of our hand.' Cal. 5. P. Dam.
1645-7, p. 256.
B.M. Pamphlets, E. 311, The Weekly Account, 26 Nov.-2 Dec. 1645.
* Ibid. Diary or Exact Journal, 10 Dec. 1645.
* Ibid. E. 313, Diary or Exact Journal, 19 Dec. 1645.
" Ibid. The Weekly Account, 16-30 Dec. 1645.
II Ibid. E. 314, The Scottish Dove, 24 Dec.-i Jan. 1645-6.
" Ibid. E. 313, The Weekly Account, 16-30 Dec. 1645.
11 Cal. S. P. Dm, 1645-7, 306.
352
POLITICAL HISTORY
Goldsmiths' Hall to convoy the arms, clothes, and ammunition to be sent
to the Scots army at Newark.1
But Newark Castle now protected by two new fortifications, the ' King's
Sconce ' and the ' Queen's Sconce,' seemed invulnerable, and the county
began to weary under the burden of victualling the besieging forces. In
January, 1645—6, the inhabitants ' of that part of the county of Nottingham
lying on the north side of the Trent ' petitioned the Committee of Lords and
Commons, complaining of the hardships they suffered at the hands of the
Scotch army.2 A complaint was therefore made to General Leslie, but in
February he wrote back to the committee enclosing a letter signed by 47
gentlemen of Nottingham giving ' a good character of the Scotch army.'
Though the burden was great, they wrote, 'in this small, barren, and exhausted
north part of our country, we cannot but cheerfully acknowledge our great
thankfulness for your favour. . . We are sorry that our poverty and weaknesse
cannot answer your merits and noblenesse.' Parliament ordered £15,000 per
mensem for the maintenance of the forces before Newark, and the general
ordered that the least wrong or violence done by his soldiers to any
whatsoever in persons or goods should merit death.3 Throughout the
disasters of February and March, 1646, Newark still held out under Bellasis,
but already before the end of March Montreuil had been sent with a message
to the Scots promising that the king would come to the Scotch army on
assurance of security in conscience and honour and would surrender Newark
into their hands. On 28 March the besiegers summoned the garrison to
surrender, stating that Parliament had 16,000 horse and foot before the town,
' soldiers of experience, united and in health and courage.' Bellasis replied,
knowing nothing of Charles's overtures to the Scots, that he must follow the
king's commands, and 'though honour and conscience might permit the
delivery of the garrison, yet civility would retard it, lest His Majesty's Act of
Grace should be frustrated.' * However, at the end of April, Charles left
Oxford, and advancing to Southwell delivered himself into the hands of the
Scots. And 'immediately upon his coming General Leven had some treaty
with His Majesty about the surrender of Newark' ; not to the Scots themselves,
but, to 'remove all jealousy,' to the Parliament.5 The result was the character-
istic order sent by Charles to Lord Bellasis, who much against his own will
and that of his garrison, although by now the plague was raging in the town,
was forced to surrender on 6 May. By the articles of surrender the garrison
with all its ordnance and arms was to be delivered over to Parliament, and
Colonel Hutchinson with his regiment was appointed to receive the town and
the arms, and to quarter in it.8 Lord Bellasis and his officers were allowed to
march out either to one of the royal garrisons not besieged, or to their own
houses ; the soldiers were allowed to ' make peace with Parliament,' or go
beyond the seas.7 After the surrender of Newark the active participation of
the county in the Civil War was practically over. Nottingham town and
castle ' was continued a garrison for some time,'8 until in August, 1647, when
1 Cal. S. P. Dam, 1645-7, 326. ' Hist. MSS. Com. Rep. vi, 93.
1 Two letters from Lieut.-Gen. David Lesley.
1 Rushworth, Hist. Coll. pt. iv, vol. v, 250-2. 5 Ibid. p. 269.
6 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 291.
7 See Articles given in full in Rushworth, Hist. Coll. pt. iv, vol. i, 265.
8 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 297.
i 353 45
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
the Parliament, submissive to the army, ' was by the General restored to their
seats', the garrison was reduced only to the castle guard. The works at the
town and the bridges were also slighted, and since all but two of the companies
of the governor's regiment were disbanded, he gave the command, ' not worthy
of himself or his brother,' to his kinsman Captain Poulton.1 But with the
new danger rising from the king's intrigues with the Scots early in 1 648
Colonel Hutchinson was again commissioned to garrison the castle.3 An
attempt by Colonel Gilbert Byron to win over the governor to betray the
castle failed, but Byron managed to gather about 500 horse from Notting-
hamshire and Lincolnshire, and with these marched to join the royalist party
in the north. They were met and defeated by Colonel Rossiter, and Colonel
Byron himself was carried prisoner to Belvoir Castle.3 In April Cromwell was
at Nottingham on his way into Lancashire, and when he left, Colonel Thorn-
haugh and the Nottinghamshire horse marched with him and fought bravely at
Preston, where the colonel was killed.* With the renewal of royalist activity
on the alliance of Charles II with the Scots, a regiment of horse was com-
missioned from the county to go to Cromwell into Scotland.6 With the
entry of Charles into England early in 1651 it seemed probable that he would
gather his forces in the north. Thus in March the Council of State sent
notice to the Militia Commissioners for Nottinghamshire that Major-General
Harrison was sent into those parts with some forces and with directions ' to
give order to such horse, foot, and dragoons of the Militia of the county as he
should find necessary.'8 In April a further command came that 'considering
the state of affairs in the country, and the designs of the enemy in those parts,'
the troop of horse in arms in the county should be kept on foot fourteen days
longer, ' so as to be ready to prevent any insurrections or other distempers.'7
But Charles 'chose another way and went to Worcester,' and in May, 1651,
the castle of Nottingham was ordered to be demolished,8 and the two com-
panies of foot then in the castle were to march to Major-General Harrison.'
The Council of State wrote in June to Major Poulton, governor of the
castle, that they left it to him to see the demolition effectually done within
14 days, so that the castle and all outworks and fortifications should be
altogether demolished before 10 November.10 A few days later they wrote
ordering that to prevent the great quantity of brass and iron, ordnance and
arms in the castle from being embezzled, it should be sent by water to Hull
and thence to the Tower of London.11 They were not sent by October of that
year ' for want of money, as is alleged,' and the council ordered that the needful
sums of money should ' be imprested to Mr. Collin, late master gunner, on
account,' and a bill of exchange for the amount should be drawn upon the
council at six days' sight.13 During the next few years the royalist faction in
the county seems to have been entirely subdued even when royalist hopes
were rising in 1655, and in 1656 Whalley, who was major-general of the
1 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 306.
1 Ibid. p. 308. 3 Ibid. p. 312-3. ' Ibid. p. 317-24.
1 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. 355. 6 Cat. S. P. Dam, 1651, p. 97. ' Ibid. p. 132.
Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 357 ; this was by her husband's influence, since he was convinced that
Cromwell and the army were ' carrying on designs of private ambition,' and ' he would not that what he had
preserved for the liberty of his country should be a curb upon them.'
' Cal. S. P. Dom. 165 I, pp. 187-8. 10 Ibid. p. 242.
11 Ibid. p. 245. "Ibid. p. 48 1.
354
POLITICAL HISTORY
district, boasted that under his own stern rule one might ' ride all over Notting-
hamshire and not see a beggar or wandering rogue.'1
In the meantime, after the surrender of Newark, various delinquents of
the county made their submission, and compounded for their estates under
the articles of surrender. Among these were Henry Bellasis, son of the
governor, Sir Richard Byron, Lord Chaworth, Lord Lexington (formerly
Robert Sutton), Sir Thomas Williamson, late sheriff, Sir Christopher Athar,
and Thomas Harrington.2 They admitted their complicity in gathering
forces for the garrison, and in collecting subsidies for service against Parlia-
ment. The inhabitants of Newark in general also compounded in June,
1 646, but because ' the plague raged very much there ' they could not per-
sonally attend to prosecute their suit.8 Lady Lexington also certified that
by reason of the plague she could not go to Newark in person nor send her
servants there to ascertain the value of her husband's estates.4 John Nichol-
son, alderman of Newark, excused himself from appearing to compound since
he must remain in Newark ' to assist in its government during the pesti-
lence.'6 Gervase Lee begged mitigation of his assessment in 1647, stating
that he was captain of a train band, and being aged and infirm was forced
into Newark by the sheriff.8 In October, 1650, the county committee for
Nottinghamshire informed the Committee for Compounding that from the
March sequestrations in the county they had advanced £1,293 I4-r- l^-> ' a
large sum considering the ruinous state of this county, long the seat of the
war, so that many estates were untenantable.' 7 They also stated that through
the power of the enemy and the indigency of the country the late Committee
for Sequestration received not one-fortieth of the sequestrations, and had to
borrow money to carry on the parliamentary service ; and when Newark was
reduced most of the sequestrations were discharged.8 In December, 1659, the
County Commissioners for Derbyshire reported to the Committee for Seques-
tration concerning commotions in these parts, and that one of their number
with his troop had gone into Nottinghamshire to appease distempers there.9
Edward Heming reported from Nottingham that he had spent fourteen days
in the county, and ' had done what he could,' but ' the commissioners here
have been disturbed by papers set on the forts, intimating that it would be
good service to knock us on the head, so that I can get none to act.' 10
Already Monk had entered England, and had been well received as he
passed through the county on his way to London.11 His coming was followed
by a cry for a free Parliament, resulting in the final dissolution of the Rump
in March, 1660. And ' some time before the writs for the new elections
came, the town of Nottingham, as almost all the rest of the island, began to
grow mad, and to declare themselves so in their desires of the king.' 12 The
townsmen, now that they no longer needed protection, quarrelled with the
soldiers quartered there, until at length permission came from Monk to 'let
loose the fury of the regiment on the town,' but by Colonel Hutchinson's
1 Gardiner, Hist, of Commonwealth and Protectorate, iii, 242.
s Cal. of Com. for Compounding, and Cal. of Com. for Adv. of Money.
3 Cal. of Com. for Compounding, 1,335.
4 Ibid. 1,336. 6 Ibid. 1,371. ° Cal. of Com. for. Adv. of Money, 538.
7 Cal. of Com. for Compounding, i, 342-3. 8 Ibid. 9 Ibid. p. 771.
10 Ibid. " Bailey, Annals ofNott. iii, 865.
" Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 399.
355
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
intervention the order was countermanded. Counted as the deliverer of the
town, Colonel Hutchinson was therefore chosen as one of its representatives
in the new Parliament. The other member elected was Mr. Arthur Stan-
hope, also a ' Parliament man.' l But the elections generally went in favour
of the king's party, and when in May, 1660, Charles was welcomed back, the
gentry of Nottinghamshire sent an address of ' laudation and congratulation
to the king on his restoration.' 2 Of the four Nottinghamshire men who had
sat as judges in the High Court of Commission held on Charles I,3 Ireton
was dead ; Whalley had refused to obey the proclamation for surrender, and was
excluded from the Act of Indemnity and forced to flee to America for his
life ;4 Millington abjectly ' confessed himself guilty every way,' and his
death sentence was commuted to imprisonment for life ; 6 Hutchinson pleaded
that his share in the king's execution had been the result of ' the inexperience
of his age and the defect of his judgment, and not the malice of his heart,'
and by the connivance of his friends was included in the Act of Amnesty or
Oblivion. 6
Although Nottinghamshire, like the rest of England, had accepted
Charles so gladly, before three years were over it was engaged with the rest
of the north of England with the Yorkshire plot.7 In October, 1663, Colonel
Hutchinson was in consequence apprehended with his papers and writings
and conveyed to the Tower ' for treasonable designs and practices.'8 He
stated that he had been at his own house twelve months without stirring
except to pay the benevolence ; that he had never heard of the rising in the
north till he came to Newark, nor was asked to concur in it ; that he had not
heard of a secret council to manage public disturbances ; that he did not
keep a horse, saddle, nor arms, except birding pieces allowed his sons by
Lord Newcastle ; that none of his children had had any correspondence about
any public design.9 He was, however, confined to the Tower, whence he
wrote in March, 1664,10 Secretary Bennett, complaining that he had been close
prisoner twenty weeks without accusation, and begging a copy of the
warrant of his commitment, which Sir John Robinson refused him.10 This
was allowed him, but he still seems to have suffered much ill usage at the
hands of Sir John Robinson.11 Finally in May, 1664, he was transferred to
Sandown Castle, in Kent, where he died of fever four months later.12 In
August, 1663, when ' one hundred of the chief designers ' of the Yorkshire
plot had been seized, one Thomas Calton, of Leicester, was examined, and
stated that his master, Captain Lockier, had said that ' Thomas Palmer, of
Nottingham, would raise a troop of horse, and they would meet at Notting-
ham on October 12.' ls After the renewal of the plot in October, 1663, and
the seizure of conspirators, Sir Thomas Gower wrote to Secretary Bennett in
October, 1664, that a certain schoolmaster of Newcastle, for whom search
1 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. p. 399.
* Cal. S.P. Dam. 1660, i, 5. » Nalson, Trial of Charles I, p. 21.
4 Noble, Lives of the Regicides, 328. * Ibid. 82-4.
6 Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit. pp. 403-8.
7 See Sir Thomas Gower's papers concerning the ' intended rising in England.' The design of the con-
spirators is here said to be to fall on Whitehall, seize the dukes of York and Albemarle, the head treasurer and
the Lord Chancellor, and to take several towns. S.P. Dom. Chas. II, Ixxxi, 77.
8 Cal. S.P. Dam. 1663-4, P- 3H- 9 Ibid. p. 329.
Ibid. p. 526. " S.P. Dom. Chas. II, xcv, 103.
" For account of imprisonment and death, see Mrs. Hutchinson, op. cit.
13 Cal. S.P. Dom. 1663-4, P- 663.
356
POLITICAL HISTORY
was now being made, had spoken of ' great assistance for the plot from the
county of Nottinghamshire, also of great preparations in the middle of
England, and of a great number of persons of quality engaged.' * In the
following March a certain Philip Wild was examined concerning his know-
ledge of the plot. It was proved that he knew that Lockier would raise 500
men at Nottingham, that he ' often spoke of the plot, offered press money to
enlist persons, and said there would soon be an alteration.' The prisoner's
defence was that he remembered nothing of this, but that ' his head was once
hurt and a piece of his skull taken out, that his brain was somewhat distem-
pered, and that he had been drinking.' 2 He was therefore pardoned in June,
1665, since the 'jury were satisfied that he was drunk when he tried to enlist
soldiers, and that he is distracted on the changes of the moon.'3 Plots such
as this were naturally the result of a strong anti-Papist element in the county,
and the strength of the feeling in Nottingham itself seems to be proved by
the joy with which the proclamation against Papists was received in the town
in March, 1673. 'It was received with so much joy that bells and
bonfires rang and flamed as they never did since the restoration. The Fanatics
contended with the Conformists who should show most zeal in expressing
their joy for his Majesty's great grace.' *
It was, indeed, the ecclesiastical policy of the later Stuarts that gave
colour to the political events of their reigns, since it alienated both Cavalier
and Roundhead, ' Conformist ' and ' Fanatic.' Hence Nottinghamshire was
ready with the rest of England to welcome the Prince of Orange as it had
welcomed Charles Stuart.5 On 24 November, 1688, William Cavendish,
duke of Devonshire, wrote to the earl of Derby concerning the supporters of
the Prince of Orange in the Midland shires, that there were now at Notting-
ham, Lord Cholmondeley, Sir Scrope How, Sir William Russell, Mr. Charleton,
Mr. Harvey, Mr. Hartop, Mr. Palmer and others. That morning before
Lord Delamere left a public declaration was made by his supporters in the
Nottingham market-place, ' where there was a great concourse of people,' to
stand by the Prince of Orange with their lives and fortunes.6 Four days later
the duke wrote from Mansfield to the Yorkshire supporters, that since the
prince needed a considerable addition of horse the Yorkshire horse, num-
bering 240, should join with the contingents from Nottinghamshire
and Northamptonshire, and march together to him a thousand strong.
' For we' shall march to-morrow from hence (i.e. Mansfield) to Nottingham
about 300, and I am assured to have near 100 more sent me in there.'7
A similar account of the part played by the county comes in a contem-
porary record of William's progress through England : — ' Que les my lords
de Devonshire de Derby Lumley et plusieurs autres avoi't assemble de la
1 Cal. S.P. Dom. 1664-5, P- 32- This is rather different from what was reported in July, 1663, that
'no considerable men ' would join the rebels. Ibid. 1663—4, p. 216.
* Ibid. 1664-5, pp. 262-3. * Ibid. pp. 263, 449.
* Ibid. 1672-3, p. 49.
5 Early in November, 1688, Lord Delamere 'having a mind to try the disposition of the populace, on a
sudden ordered the trumpets to sound to arms, giving out that the king's forces were within four miles of
Nottingham.' Immediately both horse and foot were in readiness, ' some appeared with firelocks, some with
swords, some with other weapons, even pitchforks not excepted,' and ' My Lord Delamere and his party were
well pleased with the readiness of the people to give their assistance.' Sutton, Nott. Date Book.
6 Hist. MSS. Com. Rep. ix, 460^. This meeting was according to an arrangement made by Lord Danby
(Ibid. Ref. xi, pt. vii, 30).
7 Ibid. Rep. ix, 460^.
357
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
cavallerie composed des Gentilshom'es du pays une partie a York et 1'autre
a Nottingham qu'ils alloi't marcher aussez vers Glocester pour se joindre a
n're armee.' l On 4 December Princess Anne came to Nottingham, whither
she had arrived ' safe out of their hands by your lordship's (the bishop of
London) prudent conduct.' As a result of her presence the duke of Devon-
shire wrote that ' great numbers came in every day,' and on 8 December he
wrote further that the forces gathered at Nottingham then numbered 1,500
horse and two companies of foot.8 The flight of James three days later
avoided recourse to arms, and by the Declaration of Right William and Mary
became legal sovereigns. The lord-lieutenant of Nottinghamshire reported in
June, 1689, how well the county was affected to the king,3 and it remained
loyal to him throughout his reign, having little part in Jacobite plots.
With the death of Anne and the beginning of the Hanoverian Dynasty
the aggressive policy of the Whigs roused the High Tory party into action,
and resulted in the Jacobite plot of 1715. As a result Lord Newcastle,
lord-lieutenant of Nottinghamshire, wrote to the deputy -lieutenants in
September, 1715, that they must have 'immediate care to regulate the
militia of the county,' for since ' the Pretender is resolved to try his fate at
last by flinging himself into the hands of his friends either here or in Scotland
it is absolutely necessary that the militia of Nottingham should be rendered
useful as soon as possible, it being a passage into Scotland, and so capable of
doing great service.' Account was to be taken of the number of men, both
horse and foot, that the county was lawfully bound to furnish, and the horse
especially were to be in readiness.4 ' The county cannot be disobliged if
upon this extraordinary occasion where our religion and liberty are so nearly
concerned their safety be considered more than their ease.' 6 The deputy-
lieutenants wrote back in October that good progress had been made, but
' fixing the horses of the Peers, especially such as were not rated formerly
. . . ought to be judged by the Council.' They reported a need of
arms, and stated that all the officers of the horse and foot were ' entirely
unacquainted to discipline their men,' so that it would be well if some
person were sent to instruct them.6 Another letter from the deputy-
lieutenants stated that the inhabitants of Nottingham and Worksop had
offered to arm themselves at their own charge and ' gather together with
other hearty friends of the government, to be commanded by such officer or
officers as shall be agreed upon to command them.' This offer they thought
it ' very proper to countenance ... at this critical juncture.' They also
suggested that a regiment of regulars should be sent to Nottingham, since
the Trent was seldom fordable at that season of the year, and the few bridges
over it might easily be broken down, so that ' should any insurrection be in
these parts it would be difficult to get any troops over the river to suppress
them.7 The lord- lieutenant approved of the proposed association, and
1 Hist. AfSS. Com. Rep. zz'a
' Ibid, si, pt. vii, 27. » Cal. S.P. Dem. 1689-90, p. 137.
4 In accordance with the Act of March, 1659, f°r settling the militia, the landowners of Nottinghamshire
were bound to furnish ' one troope horse furnished with sufficient furniture as saddle, bridle, brest plate, and
crupper,' mounted with ' such a rider on him as the commissioners shall approve of, sufficiently armed with
sword, pistolls, with holsters, carbine, backe, brest and head piece.' The trooper was to have 2/. a day ' for
soe many days as hee shalbe absent from his dwelling and calling by occasion of muster or exercise.' Add.
MS. 34,769, fol. 58.
4 Add. MS. 33,060, fol. 34. 6 Ibid. fol. 38. 7 Ibid. fol. 40.
358
POLITICAL HISTORY
declared himself willing to do all in his power to encourage his countrymen
' to distinguish themselves upon this extraordinary occasion that it may
appear to the world that the county of Nottingham still have that regard for
their religion and liberty which was so remarkable in their ancestors.' He
had spoken to the duke of Marlborough concerning half-pay officers to
instruct the militia, but they could only be removed from their present
stations if the town would bear their travelling expenses.1 In November he
wrote his satisfaction to hear of ' the good appearance their horse militia
made at the review, which was beyond expectation.' The arms they needed
should be sent as soon as possible, except bayonets and swords ; they should
have been sent sooner but for ' the great scarcity of arms and the great call
there is for them.'2 However, 'on receiving the glorious news of the entire
defeat of the northern rebels' at Preston on 1 1 November, and at Sheriffmuir
two days later, the musters were delayed for some days in hope that the peers'
horses would then be ready and the others more complete in their mounting
and arms. At Mansfield many honest men had entered into ' a particular
association for a troop of horse.' At Southwell many of the ' good men
thereabouts ' were drawn into the association, but some were seized on
suspicion of being disaffected. The volunteer companies at Nottingham
and Worksop had received their commissions and would soon muster, and
the deputy-lieutenants were hopeful of bringing ' the same good design . . .
to some perfection ' before they left Newark.3 But in spite of the loyalty
of the county to the Hanoverian house a spirit of Jacobitism lingered in
Nottingham. Thus Mr. Alderman Hawksley, who was mayor of Notting-
ham in 1715, ' gave an entertainment to a party of his political friends, when
probably from a state of inebriety ... he went down on his bare knees
before the company, and from a large silver tankard . . . drank — " Success
to the House of Stuart." He was accordingly committed by a brother
magistrate, and while in prison was visited by vast numbers of his brother
Jacobites, more especially those of the higher classes in society, for many
miles round.'* Again in 1745, when the Young Pretender reached Derby,
Nottinghamshire shared in the general panic, but there seem to be few or no
details as to preparations made in the county for defence or as to any move-
ment in favour of the Jacobite cause.
The reorganization of the militia in 1757, and the attempt to raise it
by ballot, met with much opposition in Nottinghamshire.6 At Mansfield,
on 5 September, a mob of about 500 persons broke into the room where the
ballot was to be taken, took all the papers by force, and after carrying them
1 Add. MS. 33,060, fol. 42 ; and Hist. AfSS. Com. Rep. xi, pt. vii, 126.
'Add. MS. 33,060, fol. 54. A bill for 'Tropheys' for the county gives the full complement of arms
and equipment for the militia : ' 2 Blew damask standards imbroidered with His Grace the Duke of Newcastle's
coat of arms in silver fringe, £13; 1 8 Halberts I is. per piece, £<) l8/. ; 2 Standards staffes with Belts and
Springs, £$; 2 Tassells, £3; 2 Red Leather cases lined, 12s.; for a box to pack them in, $s. ; 6 colors and
makeing, £10 ; 6 color staffs with gilt heads, £2 8/. ; 6 pr. of blew color tassclls and strings, £3 6s.; for
painting of 6 colors, £12 ; 12 Drummes, £12 ; painting 12 Drummes, £ 9 ; 5 cases to pack them in,
£l 3/. lod.; for Bayes to line case for colors, 4/.; carriage to the carryer, 2s. 6d.; 50 carabines at 2$s. per
piece, ^62 los. ; 50 carabine Belts at 6s. per piece, £15 ; 50 Buckets and Straps, £3 I?'-; for 3 chests for
the carabines, £i 4*.; 44 long muskets at 22/., ^48 8/.; loo muskets at 22/., £110; 106 muskets at l8/.,
£95 8/.; 250 Bionets at 2s. 6J., £31 j/.; 210 Swords at 5/., £$z ios.; 10 large chests at us., £$ los.;
for 3 boxes for Swords and Bionets, £ l 2s.' (Ibid. fol. 77). Mr. Round points out that these figures imply
a regiment of six companies each with a ' colour,' three sergeants armed with halberts, and two drummers.
* Add. MS. 33,060, fol. 61. 4 Sutton, op. cit. p. 15.
'The number demanded from the county was 480. Gent. Mag. 1757, p. 301.
359
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
in triumph through the streets, finally burned them.1 In 1759, when there
was a threatened descent of the French on England, another attempt was
made to mobilize the Nottinghamshire militia, but so keen was the feeling
of the county against the ballot system that many of the local gentry refused
commissions and preferred to pay a fine instead.8 From this date until 1775
Nottinghamshire seems to have paid heavy levies in default of raising
militia, but in August of that year, at a meeting held by the deputy-lieutenants
at the Swan Inn, Mansfield, all disputes were adjusted and the number of
men settled as follows: — Nottingham town, 80; Bassetlaw hundred, 123 ;
Broxton, 93 ; Thurgarton, 70 ; Rushcliffe, 34 ; Bingham, 37 ; Newark, 46."
The regiment was entitled the ' Forty-second or Nottinghamshire Regi-
ment of Militia,' and consisted of a grenadier and a light infantry company
and the six ordinary companies with their three sergeants and two drummers
each. On 20 May, 1776, they assembled for twenty-eight days' training in
Nottingham, and a parade-ground was formed on the north of the town.4
In 1778, when England was involved in the American War and France had
united with America, the militia of each county was called upon to undertake
home defence. Inducements were held out to recruits for the Nottinghamshire
militia, ' good English ordinary of roast beef and plum pudding, and a ticket
for the play at night and a handsome bounty.' Moreover they were to be
quartered ' in the delightful and plentiful town of Kingston upon Hull,
where excellent ale is sold at only threepence the full quart, fish of the best
quality at one penny per pound, and shambles meat at a lower rate than in
most towns of the kingdom.'6 In June the militia, now reduced to 320
privates, since so many men had volunteered for the line into the 45th,6 left
Nottingham for Hull in two divisions ; the first the grenadier company with
three others under the command of Lord George Sutton, the second the light
infantry with the other three companies under Major Cartwright.7 At Hull
the militia gave good proof of their fitness by their ready defence of the town
against an intended attack by the French in November, 1778." In June,
1779, they were ordered into camp on Southsea Common near Portsmouth ;
in December the camp was broken up, and they went into winter quarters at
Gosport.9 From 1780 until disembodied in 1783 the numbers of the militia
remained about the same, the privates of the eight companies numbering
about 370: drummers, 16; corporals, 21; sergeants, 21 ; surgeon, i ; quarter-
master, i; chaplain, i; ensigns, 5; lieutenants, 10; captains, 5; lieutenant-
colonel, i; colonel, I.10
1 Sutton, Nott. Date Book, p. 42 ; Gent. Mag. 1757, p. 430. ' Lord Robert S(a)v(i)le was near being
stifled by the mob, but by civility and kind entreaty he at last prevailed on them to let him have a little air
that he might recover himself. Several of the mob collar'd Sir George S(avile) and threatened to strike him ;
in short, none of the gentlemen who were present escaped without receiving marks of their resentment. The
cause of these outrages is said to be this : at the time when recruits were raising in that county for Col. N.'s
regiment the men who were inlisted were promised that not one of them should be sent abroad, since which
it is said that all or most of these men . . . have been sent abroad and many of them killed by the enemy.'
'Ibid. 1759, p. 304. The number demanded was again 480, but the return nil. See Add. MSS.
33,060, ff. 144-6.
3 Sutton, op. cit. p. 112. In 1774 £4° hid been levied on Nottingham town as fine of £5 per man for
the twenty-eight men that should have been furnished in the last year. Ibid. p. 103.
4 On 14 June a ball was given at the castle to celebrate the formation of the regiment. Sutton,
op. cit. p. 115.
5 Ibid. pp. 1 19-20. 6 See infra. 'Sutton, op. cit. p. 121.
"A. E. Lawson Lowe, Royal Sherwood Foresters, p. 1 6. 9 Sutton, op cit. p 132
10 Muster Rolls, P.R.O.
360
POLITICAL HISTORY
From 1783 to 1788 the regiment was not assembled for training, but
from this date until embodied for coast defence in 1793 it seems to have met
annually. In 1797, when the militia was at Hull, since there was great fear
of a French attack, the Leicestershire militia was sent to relieve the Notting-
hamshire, and the latter was divided into several detachments, which were
stationed at Bridlington, Hornsea, and other coast towns.1
With the Peace of Amiens in April, 1802, came the disembodiment of
the whole of the militia, each non-commissioned officer and private receiving
one month's pay as a gratuity. The Militia Act of the same year fixed the
number of the Nottinghamshire militia at 564, this including the quota from
the county and from Nottingham town and county.3 By this Act men between
eighteen and forty-five were to be raised by ballot or to pay a fine of ^Tio to
be exempt for five years. In the critical years of 1803 and 1804, when
France was engaged in vast preparations against England, the Nottingham
militia was ordered to the south coast, and the actual strength of the regiment
soon reached more than 1,000 of all ranks. Later in the year it was stationed
at Margate and then at Ramsgate, detachments being posted about the Isle of
Thanet.3 In 1811 and 1812 the militia was on service in Ireland. In
November, 1813, by reason of its good service a detachment of the regiment
was ordered to undertake the duties of royal guard for two nights and two
days,4 and in December it was further honoured by royal permission to be
styled ' the Royal Sherwood Foresters,' 5 and the present regimental badge
was adopted.
With the battle of Waterloo came the end of the period of war, and the
consequent disembodiment of the militia. The strength of the Royal Sher-
wood Foresters was reduced to one colonel, one lieut. -colonel, i major,
8 captains, 10 lieutenants, 6 ensigns, I adjutant, i surgeon, i quartermaster,
i paymaster, i sergeant-major, 18 sergeants, 19 corporals, I drum major,
10 drummers, and 564 privates.6 From this date the disembodied regiments
were only assembled for training at irregular intervals until the beginning of
the Crimean War. In 1854 they were again embodied and encamped at
Aldershot in i855.7 In the summer of 1856 they were disembodied.8 The
militia at the present day (1906) forms the 4th Battalion of the Royal
Sherwood Foresters. As such it did good service in South Africa in 1900
and 1 90 1.9
The first battalion of the Royal Sherwood Foresters represents the
nucleus of the old 45th Regiment of Foot incorporated with the volunteer
forces from Nottinghamshire. In 1779 the nobility, gentry, and clergy of the
county met in Nottingham for the purpose of raising a large county subscrip-
tion ' to be applied for the public service of this kingdom in the present
critical state of affairs.' As a result they petitioned the king that some par-
ticular regiment might be recruited in the county with the assistance of
subscription ... to be henceforward distinguished by the name of the
county.' Their petition was answered by a letter from the Secretary of War
1 A. E. Lawson Lowe, op. cit. p. 27. * Stat. 42 Geo. Ill, c. 90, Art. xix.
* A. E. Lawson Lowe, op. cit. 31-2. The patriotism of the county was shown both by the number of
volunteers for the line, and by the raising of 472 yeomanry cavalry and 3,635 volunteer infantry, besides the
ordinary militia.
4 Nott. Gaz. Nov. 1813. ' Ibid. Dec. 1813. 6 Ibid. 1815.
7 Nott. Rev. 1854 and 1855. 8 Ibid. 1856. ' 4rmy List (1905).
I 361 46
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
desiring the nobility and gentry to exercise their personal influence to promote
the levy of men in the speediest and most effectual manner, and when
300 men should be raised they should be incorporated with the 45th Regi-
ment of Foot to be thenceforward called the Nottinghamshire Regiment.1
The remains of the ' 45th ' which had then been returned from service in
America numbering less than 100 men, was therefore ordered on recruiting
service into Nottinghamshire, an extra bounty of six guineas was paid to each
recruit out of the county subscription, and the '45th ' became incorporated
with the county.3 Its services in the West Indies, in the attack on Buenos
Ayres, and in the Peninsular War, at Roleia, Vimiero, and Talavera, and at
Busaco earned for it the title of the ' Old Stubborns ' and won Wellington's
praise for steadiness and discipline.3 It also saw service in South Africa from
1899 to 1902, and was at Vlakfontein in 1901.*
By statute of 1808 a local militia was established,6 and in 1809 the
various volunteer corps in Nottinghamshire were disbanded, and in most cases
the men transferred their services to the local militia in accordance with
clause xix of the statute.6 Their services were at first confined to their own
counties, but in 1813 the crown was authorized to accept from the local
militia voluntary offers of service out of their counties for under forty days
in the year, and limited by the duration of the Act to 25 March i8i5.7 In
February, 1814, the men and officers of the Nottinghamshire local militia
were assembled for the purpose of extending their services to forty-two days.
Those who agreed to do so were not to be called out for training or
exercising for the rest of the year.8 The battle of Waterloo however gave a
death blow to the local militia, and in May, 1816, the ballot was suspended,
and the office of agent-general for local militia and volunteers was abolished.9
When the aggressive policy of Napoleon III brought the possibility of a French
invasion the national need of a volunteer defence, voiced in a pamphlet of
i846,10 was slowly realized by the nation at large, and led to the volunteer
movement of 1859 and to General Peel's circulars of that year. The volun-
teers of Nottinghamshire formed into battalions according to the general
regulations of 1891 are the 'Robin Hood' or, ist Nottinghamshire Rifle
Volunteers, with their headquarters at Nottingham, and the Nottinghamshire
volunteer battalions of the Sherwood Foresters, with the headquarters of their
B and C companies at Newark, and of their A company at East Retford. The
Southern Nottinghamshire Hussars (Imperial Yeomanry) have their head-
quarters in Nottingham, and the Sherwood Rangers (Imperial Yeomanry) at
East Retford.
Apart from the development of the militia the history of the eighteenth
and early nineteenth centuries wrapped itself round the system of party
government, and all that party government involved. As early as 1696
bribery and corruption were evident, and the town of Nottingham petitioned
that measures might be adopted to abate or remove the evil, that the
election of members might be free.11 Again, in 1699, on the return of Robert
' Sutton, op. cit. p. 134. ' Ibid. p. 135. 3 R. de M. Rudolph, Hist, of Territorial Regiments.
^id. • Stat. 48 Geo. Ill, c. 1 1 1. • Ibid.
Stat. 54 Geo. Ill, c. 19, extended by 56 Geo. Ill, c. 76.
' Nott. Gaz. Feb. 1814. • Ibid. M ,8,6_
Gen. Sir Chas. Napier, Defence of England by Volunteer Corps and Militia.
1 Bailey, Ann. of Notts, iii, 1,052.
362
POLITICAL HISTORY
Sacheverell as member for Nottingham, George Gregory presented a petition
to the House complaining of many illegal practices adopted by the successful
candidate.1 In the same year John Raynor, candidate for Newark, petitioned
that he himself was the duly chosen burgess, but the mayor and others had
used many illegal practices in favour of his rival Sir Francis Molyneux who had
been returned.2 In January, 1700, the House resolved that Sir Francis
Molyneux was not duly elected, and the mayor was taken into custody for
his conduct at the election.3 In the same year George Gregory and Robert
Sacheverell were again rival candidates for Nottingham. Gregory was
returned, and thereupon Sacheverell petitioned that he had been returned
by means of many corrupt and illegal practices by the sheriff, the mayor,
and many others.4 At the end of the session Parliament resolved that
Gregory was not duly elected, and the return was ordered to be amended.6
Similar petitions were sent to the House of Commons year after year, but
the system of representation was anything but satisfactory.6 In May, 1783,
John Cartwright wrote to the ' gentry, clergy, and freeholders of co. Notting-
ham who have a vain shadow of representation in Parliament, but more
particularly to the rest of the inhabitants who have no representation at
all ' that something further must be done, the unrepresented must petition
as well as the badly represented, so ' to bring the House of Commons back
to its ancient purity and dependence on the people.' Such a reform would
create no ascendancy of any one political party, ' it would not favour a
Shelburne more than a Fox, a Bute more than a Portland.' 7 A petition of
the inhabitants of Nottingham not possessed of the necessary qualification of
freehold of 40^. was accordingly prepared, but seems to have effected little.8
In 1812 and 1813, when the question of peace or war with Napoleon
played so great a part in the elections, seventy burgesses met at Nottingham
Guildhall to draw up a petition in the interests of peace. The speaker of
the evening exhibited two loaves 'of war and peace ; the first, the big loaf of
1791, and the second, the small loaf of i8i3.'9 But in the minds of many
the cause of the distress of those years lay deeper. Thus Major Cartwright
wrote : ' I hear you are petitioning about peace in your town. I would to
God you would get to work on reform, without which peace is of no value.'
No temporary expedient or temporary peace could avail ; ' to save the state is
to restore the constitution.'10 The Reform Bill of 1832 accomplished much,
but did not satisfy the extremists, whose organ in Nottinghamshire was the
Nottingham Review. Leading articles in October, 1838, called for universal
suffrage, for the sovereignty of the people, asking how long Whigs would act
Tories in denying such.11 In November, 1838, when the Chartist movement
was gaining head, a Radical demonstration was made on the borders of Sher-
wood Forest since the mayor forbade a meeting in the town. A long pro-
cession made its way to the meeting-place from the surrounding towns, and in
1 Bailey, Ann. of Notts, iii, 1,055. * Ibid. 1,056.
* Joum. of House of Commons, Jan. 1700. 4 Bailey, op. cit. iii, 1,061.
5 Journ. of House of Commons, June, 1700. However Sacheverell's triumph was but short-lived. The
return was ordered to bs amended on 10 June, Parliament was prorogued on 24 June and never met again.
6 In 1741 the burgesses and freeholders of Nottingham gave instructions to their representatives to bring
forward a Bill for ousting placemen from Parliament ; to reduce so dangerous an influence both for now and
futurity. Add. MS. 33,060, fol. 219.
' Nott. Journ. May, 1783. « Ibid. ' Nott. Gaz. Jan. 1813.
10 Ibid. " Nott. Ret>. Oct. 1838.
363
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
its ranks were the members of the Female Political Association lately formed
in the county.1 On 12, 13, and 14 August of the next year the Chartists
kept their notable ' three days' holiday.' Those of Mansfield united with
those of Button and the villages round, and marched in procession along a
lane outside Mansfield. Special constables were ordered to seize the ring-
leaders, and a detachment of the 5th Dragoons was ordered to be in readiness
to overwhelm the rebels.8 They seem, however, to have been perfectly
passive, and even the Nottingham Mercury confessed that the extreme pro-
ceedings taken against them were quite uncalled for.8 However, the next
year, in anticipation of an insurrectionary movement, special measures were
taken to secure Nottingham. From 10 to 17 August the mayor was in
constant attendance at the police office, troops were under arms every
evening, and the Rifle Brigade was in constant readiness. But the year passed
by quietly with no attempt at an organized meeting.4
The spirit of progress and reform which marked Nottinghamshire in
the early nineteenth century has grown strong in its old centres in this
early twentieth century. Newark, the royalist centre of the Civil War, still
maintains its old-time reputation, and as in 1833 it was the first constituency
of Gladstone, then ' the rising hope of the stern and unbending Tories,' so
now as ever it represents the Conservative element in the county.
1 Nott. Rev. Nov. 1838. * Ibid. Aug. 1839.
* Nott. Mercury, Aug. 1839. * Bailey, op. cit. iv, 415.
364
FORESTRY
I
central and western parts of Nottinghamshire were thickly wooded from the earliest
times. The place-name terminal ' field ' — always spelt ' feld ' in old English —
meaning a place where trees have been felled, or as we now say a clearing, is to be
found exclusively in the western half of the shire, as in Ashfield, Balkfield, Basingfield,
Eastfield, Farnsfield, Haggonsfield, Highfield, and Mansfield.
This well-wooded portion of Nottinghamshire became a great hunting district or forest for the
early Norman kings. The Domesday Survey seldom makes any reference to a forest, but the
Nottinghamshire portion of the Great Survey shows that a considerable number of the places within
the woodland district were terra regis, so that the amount of royal demesne made its conversion by
the Conqueror or his immediate successor into a large forest a comparatively easy matter.1
It is, perhaps, scarcely necessary to say that the term forest did not originally, either in its
etymological or customary signification, imply a wood, but rather a great waste reserved for royal
hunting purposes, and necessarily including certain woods and underwoods as coverts for the deer and
other game. The forest of Nottingham or Sherwood, though including various open tracts of
country, was far more thickly and generally wooded than many of the old forests, and afforded a
notable contrast to the forest of the High Peak in the adjoining county of Derby, where the
proportion of woodland was very small.2
In early days this great tract of country, which then embraced at least a fourth of the whole
county, was known in various documents as the forest of Nottingham,3 but the equivalent term of
Sherwood 4 soon became the more usual expression. The first exact notice of this forest occurs in the
year 1 1 54, when William Peverel the younger answered to the forest pleas. He controlled the forest
and held the profits under the crown. On the forfeiture of the Peverel estates, early in the reign of
Henry II, the forest lapsed to the king, and was for some time administered by the successive sheriffs
of the joint counties of Nottingham and Derby.
In the lifetime of Richard I the forest of Sherwood was held by his brother John, earl of
Morton. The earl, by charter, granted to Ralph FitzStephen and Maud de Caux his wife, all
liberties and custody of the forest of Sherwood, including permission to hunt hare, fox, cat, and
squirrel with dogs and hounds ; 5 all windfallen wood ; the valuable inner bark or bast of the lime
trees ; a skep out of every cartload of salt passing through the forest, and half a skep from a half
load ; the after pannage (retro-pannagiuni) for pigs ; all pleas of unlawed dogs ; together with all
goods and chattels belonging to thieves or ' brybours,' 6 taken by them within the forest.
The same charter sanctioned the holding of a park at Lexington (Laxton) 7 by Ralph and
Maud, wherein they might hunt deer as they pleased without molestation, and also granted them
seventy acres of assart or inclosure at Lexington and Gedling free of view of the forest ministers.8
This definite mention of robbers and thieves in Sherwood Forest in the time of Richard I,
which has not, we believe, been previously cited, causes a short digression to be made from the dry
sequence of historic facts. The very name of Sherwood at once brings to the mind the early tales
1 Royal hunting grounds (slha regis) as distinct from the king's lands or royal demesnes (terra regis) pro-
bably existed here long before the Conquest. Cox, Royal Forests of England, 4.
1 V.C.H.Derb. 397-413.
3 Anct. Forest Proc. Chan. No. 3, A.D. 1218 ; No. 24, A.D. 1232.
4 The earlier form was almost invariably ShirewoJe or ShineoJe ; the name probably came from a
considerable length of the forest bound being also the bound between the two shires of Derby and Nottingham.
5 There were roedeer in Sherwood Forest, but they were probably never numerous, and died out at a
comparatively early date. There was a single presentment for killing a roebuck at the eyre of 1 5 Edw. I.
Sherwood was so intersected with roads and by-roads, included so many fairly populous places within its limits
or on its fringes, and was so destitute of great heights, ravines, or gorges, that it could at no time be com-
pared with such wild districts as the Peak Forest, or certain parts of the royal forests of Lancashire and
Yorkshire. As Sir Robert Plumpton held a bovate of land in Sherwood, called Wolfhunt land, as late as 1433,
by the service of scaring the wolves by winding a horn, it has sometimes been supposed that wolves remained
in Sherwood as late as the reign of Henry VI. But such a surmise is altogether untenable ; the survival or
repetition of an old manorial service proves nothing.
6 Bribour was a mid-English term for a robber or pickpocket.
7 Laxton was outside the forest when the bounds were lessened by the forest charter of Henry III.
8 Exch. K. R. Acct. Forests, &^-, 6, 7. This is a paper book of 152 pages, written in English,
temp. James I. It is a sort of directory of proceedings as to the laws and customs of Sherwood Forest. It
contains the charter of the forest of Henry III, and various local charters and regulations, with the bounds and
metes of the different hays of the king and of the abbot of RufFord, the chapters of the ' regard ' temp. Edw. Ill,
together with the oaths of the forest ministers, as well as highly interesting definitions of the courts and customs
of the forest.
365
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
of Robin Hood, with Little John, Friar Tuck, Will Scarlet, and his other lawless associates, and
more particularly their various delightful adventures with the sheriff of Nottingham, and with
purse-proud travellers. Outlaw and robber that he was, the whole garland of Robin Hood ballads,
from the earliest to the latest, always represents him as an advocate of humane though levelling
principles, and a protector of the oppressed.
From wealthy abbots' chests and churches' abundant store
What oftentimes he took he shared among the poor ;
No lordly bishop came in lusty Robin's way,
To him, before he went, but for his pass must pay ;
The widows in distress he graciously relieved
And remedied the wrongs of many a virgin grieved.1
So dear were the stories of Robin Hood to our forefathers, that in the earliest days of English
printing a sheaf of ballads was issued from the press of Wynken de Worde, at the end of the
fifteenth century, under the title 'A Lytell Geste of Robyn Hode.' No earlier mention of this
character has been found than that contained in the ' Vision of Piers Ploughman,' written about
1377, wherein the character of Sloth is introduced saying : —
I can noughte perfidy my paternoster, as the prest it syngeth ;
But I can rymes of Robyn hood and Randolf erle of Chestre.
The references to this ballad hero are not infrequent in the following century. The most interesting
of these is a petition to Parliament of the year 1439, complaining that one Piers Venables of
Derbyshire rescued a prisoner, ' and after that tyme the same Piers, havynge no liflode ne sufficeante
of goodes, gaderied and assembled unto him many misdoers .... and in manere of insurrection,
weinte into the wodcs in that countrie, like as it hadde be Robyn Hode and his meyne.' 2
The popularity of the ballads of Robin Hood, which mainly associate him with Sherwood
Forest, long before the age of printing, can be abundantly testified. It is difficult to believe that
the gallant outlaw and the leading men of the earlier ballads were mere characters of fiction. Some
have supposed that he was one of the proscribed followers of Simon de Montfort ; 3 Scott, in his
inimitable Ivanboey has followed others who assign the time of Richard I to the hero, when, as
we have seen, there were certainly robbers in this forest ; whilst a third, the least possible but
perhaps the most plausible theory, is that Robin Hood was an adherent of the earl of Lancaster in
the ill-fated insurrection of 1322* The identity of Robin Hood with a pretended earl of
Huntington, who died in 1274, has no kind of substantial basis, and is a mere fond imagining of
comparatively late date. 5
The attempts to turn Robin Hood into a mere mythical hero — an ingenious German even
considering that Hood is but a corruption of Woden — find no favour at the hands of the American
scholar who has devoted so much pains and learning to his edition of the ballads of the great forest
outlaw.6 At the same time there are doubtless mythical elements in the traditions ; a genuine
character became the centre round which certain old popular legends and tales accumulated.
Randle, earl of Chester, with whom Langland associates the name of Robin Hood, did not lose his
identity as a real nobleman who flourished in the reigns of Richard I, John, and early in the time of
Henry III, because the common folk made half-fictitious rhymes about him.7
Robin Hood, like the third Randle, earl of Chester, was, it may be safely assumed, a real in-
dividual. Possibly Sir Walter Scott was right in regarding him as a Saxon holding out against the
Norman conquerors so late as the end of the twelfth century.8 At any rate the time of Richard I
is the best authenticated period for the hero's existence. It is the time assigned to him by Major in
his history of Great Britain, which appeared in 1521, wherein he gives a brief but vivid account of
Robin and his lieutenant,9 about whose deeds he states that all Britain rang with songs. This date
1 Drayton, Polyolbion, song xxvi. * Parl. R. v, 1 1 6.
s Land, and West. Review (1840), xxxiii, 424.
1 This is Hunter's theory in The Ballad-Hero, Robin Hood (1854). Mr. Hunter's arguments are based
on finding the name Robin Hood as a porter of Nottingham Castle, temp. Edward II, but the name was
of common occurrence.
5 Dr. Stukeley in his Paleographia Britanniae, invented for him a most elaborate pedigree as a descendant
of Judith, countess of Huntington, the Conqueror's niece ; it is given in Throsby's Thornton, ii, 165.
6 English and Scotch Popular Ballads, 5 vols., edited by F. J. Child. The Robin Hood section is in vol. iii
(1888), pp. 39-237.
Mr. Sidney Lee has a learned article in the Diet. Nat. Biog., wherein he strongly argues in favour of Robin
Hood being a ' mythical forest elf.'
8 This is also the view accepted by Thierry in his Norman Conquest. A correspondent of Notes and
Queries (Ser. 7) ix, 226 suggested that Robertus Hod, who killed one Ralf in the abbot of Cencester's garden
in the days of King John, and was in consequence outlawed, was identical with Robin Hood ; but this is
highly improbable.
• ' Robertus Hudus et Parvus Joannes latrones famatissimi.'
366
FORESTRY
has been followed by Grafton, Stow, and Camden. Had these men actually flourished in Sherwood at
a later date, in the thirteenth century, or in the fourteenth century, there could scarcely fail to be
definite references to their marauding habits in the presentments at the forest pleas held at Notting-
ham, of which full particulars are extant.
It was near the close of Maud de Caux's tenure of the office of keeper of this forest that the
great storm of the winter of 1222 occurred, when England was swept from end to end with
winds of extraordinary vehemence. Trees were everywhere overthrown in such vast numbers that
the old forest customs, whereby windfallen boughs, or rootfallen trees, were the perquisites of forest
ministers were suspended, and special writs were issued by the crown to the authorities throughout
England directing the sale of all such timber with a return of the proceeds. These special instruc-
tions were forwarded inter a/ia, to the (i) verderers and foresters of the forest of Sherwood, (2) to the
verderers and forester of the enclosures or hays of Sherwood (de haiis de Shirewood), (3) to Maud
de Caux, widow, keeper of the forest of Sherwood and of Clay, and (4) to Philip Marc,
keeper of the hays of Sherwood.1 The hays or parks within a forest usually had a separate set of
ministers ; the two chief hays at this period were those of Clipston and Bestwood. 2 Maud de
Caux obtaining in 1222 the title of keeper of Sherwood and Clay was a survival of the time
when the districts placed under the then rigid forest laws had been much extended by Henry II and
John, including in Nottinghamshire a considerable part of the Clay 3 division in the north-east of
the county, as well as the northern part of Hatfield or Heathfield, above Warsop. In 1215 John,
by one of the articles of Magna Charta, was compelled to agree to the disafforesting of all the great
tracts put under forest law during his reign, and in 1217 the child-king, Henry III, was made to issue
in return for certain grants, the Charter of the Forest, whereby good men and true were to view forests
in every shire, and all that had been added since the coronation of Henry II was to be disafforested.
We are not aware that there is any perambulation of this forest extant of earlier date than
1232, but in that year the Clay and Hatfield districts were declared outside the forest, and the true
bounds set forth in definite fashion.4 This perambulation is identical in its main lines with one
taken in the year 1300, though the phraseology is not quite so clear. In both cases the perambula-
tion, or setting forth of the bounds, began at the king's ford (Conyngeswath), which was a ford over the
stream of Rainworth Water between Edwinstowe and Wellow at the north-east corner of the forest,
proceeding thence in both directions.
The perambulation of 17 June, 1300, was made in the presence of the forester and verderers
and of the attorney of the justice of the forests, on the oath of Sir Gervais Clifton, Sir John Lecke,
and six other knights and four Serjeants.6 They declared that the lord king's forest of Sherwood
begins at the ford of Conyngeswath, along the road which leads as far as the town of Wellow
towards Nottingham, so that the close of the town of Wellow is outside the forest, and so by the
road which goes between Wellow and Nottingham to a certain parcel of wood called Littlehawe ;
and so ascending by a certain way towards the west between the said wood and the wood of the
abbot of Rufford, which is called Brown, and extends so far as Rainworthford ; and thence turning
aside by a certain road towards the east between the aforesaid wood of Littlehaw and the wood of
Blidworth as far as the aforesaid great road, which leads from Wellow towards Nottingham as far as
Bakestanehowe on that same great road ; and so by the same road as far as the place where
the rivulet of Dover Beck crosses the aforesaid road ; and thence as the aforesaid rivulet of Dover
Beck descends into the water which is called the Trent ; and so along the same water of the Trent
to Nottingham bridge.
The aforesaid perambulation also begins in the same county of Nottingham at the aforesaid ford
of Conyngeswath, ascending towards the west by the water which is called Meden as far as the
town which is called Warsop, and from that town ascending by the same water as far as Pleasley
Park ; and thence ascending by the same water as far as Haytrebridge ; and thence turning aside
along the high road of Nottingham as far as the bridge of Milneford, and thence ascending as far
as Mameshead ; and thence between the fields of Hardwick and Kirkby and the moor Kirkby as
far as the corner which is called Nonneker ; and thence through the assart of Ywayn le Breton as
far as Tarlesty ; and thence as far as Stolegate ; and thence along the high road as far as beneath
1 Pat. 7 Hen. Ill, m. 6. As to the instructions of this period, De Cabkiclo, i.e. the cablish or windfallen
timber, on the Patent and Close Rolls, see Cox, Royal Forests, 6, J.
' Beskwood was the old form of spelling, and generally maintained until the beginning of last century.
* Called Clay from the nature of the soil, which differed from the usually sandy soil of Sherwood.
4 Exch. Misc. Bk., No. 76. This is a small parchment book of thirteenth-century date, consisting of
115 folios, lettered on back 'Sherwood Forest Perambulation and other Proceedings,' Hen. Ill — Edw. III.
It opens with a transcript of the Charter of the Forest ; this is followed by perambulations of Sherwood,
16 Hen. Ill and 28 Edw. I.
4 There are three early MSS. of this perambulation at the Record Office, For. Proc. (Ancient)
Chancery, No. 102, m. 10; ibid. No. 44, and in Misc. Bk. 76, just cited. This English version is taken
from Turner, Pleas of the Forest (Selden Soc.) 1 18, 119.
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
the old castle of Annesley ; and from the same castle along the high road as far as the town of Linby ;
and thence through the middle of the town of Linby as far as the mill of the same town on the
water of the Leen ; and from thence descending by the same water as far as the town of Lenton ;
and thence as that water was anciently wont to run as far as the water which is called the Trent,
and so descending by the same water of the Trent as far as Nottingham bridge aforesaid1.
These bounds, which were exactly maintained until Sherwood began to be broken up at the
close of the sixteenth century, embraced a district of country about twenty miles long by eight
broad, and containing some 100,000 acres, or about a fifth of the whole shire.2
Reverting to the chief ruler of this forest, Maud de Caux died in 1223, and as the office by
the charter of the earl of Morton had been made hereditary, she was succeeded as chief forester-
of-fee by her son, John de Birkin. In 1231 this hereditary office came to Robert de Everingham,
in right of his wife Isabel, daughter and heiress of Thomas de Birkin. Adam de Everingham was
chief forester at the beginning of the reign of Edward I, and he was succeeded by his son Robert.
Soon after his accession, Robert de Everingham incurred the king's displeasure, and the office was
claimed by the crown as forfeited.3
It is clear from the Close Rolls of 1286 that the offence which brought about the downfall
of the last hereditary keeper of Sherwood Forest was the grievous abuse of his position as guardian
of the king's deer. In November of that year the crown interfered to release from Nottingham
gaol Robert de Everingham, John de Everingham, and 'nine others, who were there imprisoned for
venison trespass in Sherwood ; bail was accepted from twelve sureties, who were bound to produce
the offenders at the next eyre.4
After the disgrace of Robert de Everingham, the position of chief forester or keeper (custos)
of Sherwood was granted by the crown to various persons of high position as a mark of royal
favour. It was a post not only of dignity, but of privilege and emolument.
The forest pleas for Sherwood were held at Nottingham in July, 1251, before Geoffrey
Langley, forest justice, when the duties as well as the privileges of Robert de Everingham as keeper
were defined. It was then reported that there were within the forest three keepings, namely,
the first between the streams of the Leen and Dover Beck, the second the High Forest, and the
third Rumewood. The chief keeper was bound to have a sworn chief servant, who was to go
through all the forest at his own cost, to attach transgressors, and to present them before the
verderers at the attachment courts. In the first keeping the chief keeper was to find a riding
forester with a servant, two foot foresters, two verderers, and two agisters ; in this keeping were
three parks or hays, namely, Bestwood, Linby, and Welby. In the second keeping there were to
be two riding foresters with their servants, two foot-foresters, two verderers, and two agisters;
the hays of Birkland, with Bilhagh and Clipston, were in this keeping, and to them pertained two
other verderers as well as two agisters. The third keeping of Rumewood had a foot-forester, two
verderers, and two agisters ; and also two woodwards, one for Carburton, and one for Budby. It
was also declared that Robert de Everingham ought to provide a servant, bearing his bow,6 to gather
cheminage or wayleave through the forest.6
There are certain particulars extant with regard to the forest pleas of Sherwood which were
held in 1267. Several hundred vert offenders were brought before the court. The heaviest
presentment under this head was that against the abbot of Rufford for having felled 483 oaks for
building purposes since the last eyre ; the abbot was, however, able to plead successfully a charter
of Henry II in justification of his action.7
A striking illustration of the occasionally rebellious conduct of the forest tenants of Sherwood against
the officials who guarded the king's game occurred in 1276. On 3 July John de Lasceles, steward
(senacallui) of the forest, caught two men, Robert Martham and Robert Afferton, with bows and
1 Edward I broke the Forest Charter in several cases throughout the kingdom under legal quibbles, but
as a rule the bounds as settled in his father's time were maintained. In 1281 the king ordered an inquisition
relative to the Sherwood perambulation, with the result that the bounds of 1 6 Hen. Ill were held good ; save
that the wood of Rumewood and the townships of Carburton, Budby, and half the townships of Thoresby and
Skegby and the townships of Sutton in Ashfield and Bulwell, with certain other parts, were to be held forest, as
being part of the whole demesne of the crown, and therefore, wrongly disafforested temp. Hen. III. (For. Proc.
Chan. No. 72.) There are also somewhat contradictory memoranda attached to some versions of the ancient
1300 perambulation, wherefrom it would appear that the king's wood of Wellow and the archbishop's wood of
Littlehagh were again afforested. At the beginning of the seventeenth century the following townships were
declared ' ould demesne not geldable ': —Arnold, Bulwell (half), Carburton, Clipston, Darlton, Linby,
Mansfield, Mansfield Wbodhouse, Roynton, Skegby, and Sutton in Ashfield. Exch. K. R. Accts. &££-, f. 66.
' See perambulation of Sherwood 30 Hen. VIII., Fourteenth Rep. of Woods and Forests (1793) App. ii.
' See the two Sherwood Forest Chartularies already cited, passim.
4 Close, 14 Edw. I, m i.
6 This was the officer who was afterwards termed the Bow-bearer or Ranger.
' Exch. K. R. Accts. £|5, pp. 7, 8. ' Exch. Misc. Bk. Ixxvi.
368
FORESTRY
arrows, and took them to Blidworth, intending to keep them till the morrow, when doubtless they
were to be delivered to the sheriff at Nottingham Castle. But during the night twenty men, armed
with swords and bows and arrows, broke open the doors of the place where they were confined,
released the prisoners, and severely beat one Gilbert, a young servant of the steward. Then the
men proceeded to the residence of the steward, insulted him, and broke his doors and windows.
When an inquest was held by the verderers, regarders, and other ministers of the forest, it was
found that two or three of the marauders had fled into Yorkshire, and one was dead, but sixteen
names are set forth.1
The next forest pleas of Sherwood were held at Nottingham on I January, 1287, before Sir
William de Vescy, Thomas de Normanville, and Richard de Creping, justices in eyre of the lord king.2
The verderers were six in number, namely, Richard de Fort, William de Colwick, John de Annesley,
Henry de Tinsley, William de Bevercotes, and Ralph clerk of Mansfield. Robert de Everingham
was the forester-of-fee, and under him were eight sworn foresters.
Sir William de Vescy and his fellow justices, finding that the king had sustained many losses
since the last eyre held by Robert de Neville and others, arising in many instances from the general
assize of the forest not being sufficiently observed, laid down certain special injunctions to the
following effect : —
That all verderers, in accordance with the charter of the forest, were to assemble every forty
days to hold attachments for vert and venison and small pleas.
That they were to present a single roll of vert and venison to the justices in eyre, and not each
one a separate roll for his own bailiwick.
That anyone dwelling in the forest found felling a green oak be attached for the next attachment
court, there to find pledges till the next eyre, and to pay the price to the verderers ; a second offence
to be dealt with in like manner ; but for a third offence to be imprisoned at Nottingham, and there
kept till he be delivered by the king or justice of the forest.
That anyone dwelling outside the forest committing any trespass against the vert, his body is to
be committed to prison till he be delivered by the king or justice ; for a third offence he is also to lose
his horses and cart, or his oxen and wagon, or their price, and that price is to be paid at the next
attachment to the verderers for the king's use.
That those dwelling in the forest caught cutting saplings, branches, or drywood from oaks or
hazels, or thorns, or limes, or alders, or hollies, or such-like trees, without warrant, are to be attached
by two good pledges to come to the next attachment court, there to be amerced for the king ; but if
it be for a sapling which is of greater price than ^d. or any higher sum, to be attached until the next
eyre.
That escapes of beasts of the plough into the forest be pleaded in attachments, and amends taken
for the use of the king.
That no man carry bows or arrows in the forest outside the king's highway save a sworn
forester, and on the king's highway only in accordance with the assize of the forest.
That no man save a sworn forester or other sworn officer attach anyone in the future.
That any dweller outside the forest agisting his animals therein is to have such animals taken before
the verderers and the price paid, and to make answer before the justices in eyre.
That the great burden of so many regarders is no longer to be endured, but that in this forest the
number be limited to twelve.
And that those taken by night or in the fence month* within the forest be dealt with as
before.
The very large number of 350 head of deer (both red and fallow) had died of murrain in the
one year preceding the holding of this eyre, and were entered on the venison presentments. In
another year ten harts, three hinds, sixty-one bucks, and twelve deer had perished from disease.
The Attachment, or Forty-day Court as it was sometimes called from the period at which it
was summoned, was held by the verderers with much regularity in Sherwood for a long time after
the pronouncement of the forest justices at Nottingham in 1287. These courts were held at four
different centres, namely at Edwinstowe, Mansfield, Linby, and Calverton, on successive days of the
same week. There are a large number of the Sherwood Attachment Court Rolls at the Public
Record Office, from Edward I to Henry IV, with a few of later date.4 The Attachment Roll of
1292—3, which is in an imperfect state, gives lists of the presentments for vert offences and the fines
imposed. A green oak was usually valued at 6d., and a dry or leafless oak at 4^. ; a sapling
1 Exch. Misc. Bk. Ixxvi, f. 55^. ' For. Proc. Tr. of Rec. No. 27.
* The fence month (mends vetitus) of the forest lasted from fifteen days before Midsummer Day to fifteen
days after ; it was the special time when the deer required quiet and protection just after fawning.
Cheminage of a special character was often levied during the month. See Cox, Royal Forests, 59-61.
4 Exch. K. R. Accts. Forests, ^ (20-2 1 Edw. I), ^ (3 Edw. Ill), John de Crumbwell, keeper ; ^- to
!-§£ (20 to 40 Edw. Ill), Ralph de Neville, keeper ; one each of John de Neville (41-42 Edw. Ill) and John
atte Lee (42-3 Edw. Ill) ; l£5 to -'T3^ (42-3 Edw. Ill to 4-5 Ric. II), William Latimer ; ^/- (5-6 Ric. II),
Walter de Neville; and J^5 (1—5 Hen. IV), Ralph earl of Westmoreland. As to attachment and swainmote
courts and their powers, see Cox, Royal Forests, 13-16.
1 369 47
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
(blectruni) varied from id. to 3^., and a stubb or dry trunk of a pollarded tree at id. The roll for
1317 shows that twenty-two attachment courts were held that year, namely six each at Mansfield
and Edwinstowe, and five each at Linby and Calverton. Amongst those presented in 1318 were
Nicholas de Nottingham, rector of Clipston, and Robert de Kirkby, rector of Kirkby in Ashfield. In
1330, each of the four courts was held eight times. The full number of nine courts at each centre
was held in 1347 ; on some rolls it is clear that the court was not entered when there were no
presentments. The roll for this year, as well as some others, shows a higher rate of fines (such as
I2</. and 6d. for vert offences) at Mansfield than at the other courts ; this difference may have been
brought about through the necessity of being more particular to guard the wood where the popula-
tion was greater. The thirty-six courts of this year brought in value fines to the amount of
£6 14*. id. The roll for 1401-2 shows that eight courts were held that year at Calverton, six at
Mansfield, five at Edwinstowe, and two at Linby.
These attachment courts took cognizance of beasts trespassing as well as of vert offences ; thus
in 1330 there were cases of id. fines for the straying of cow or stirk, of 3^. for five sheep, and of
Sd. for twenty-six sheep. In 1430 foals were agisted in Clipston Park at 6d. each, cows from 6d.
to iod., and calves at 3^.1
In April, 1309, the sheriff of Nottingham was ordered to assemble all the regarders and
foresters of Sherwood to make regard or survey therein before the coming of the justices of the forest,
and to cause regarders to be elected in the place of those who were dead or infirm, so that there be
twelve in number. The foresters were to swear that they would lead these twelve knights
throughout their whole bailiwicks to view all the trespasses, and to set out the same in writing under
the headings that were forwarded. These twelve headings deal with all purprestures old and new,
assarts, wastes, eyries of hawks and falcons, forges and mines, honey, those who had bows and arrows
and greyhounds, etc., in accordance with the usual ' charter of the regard.' The phrase as to the
coming of the justices was a mere form ; it was repeated in the summons for the regard of
Sherwood in 1312, although in neither case was the regard followed by an eyre or forest pleas.2
Sherwood from early days was a treasury for kingly gifts both of wood and venison. The
royal grants of timber from this forest were frequent throughout the reign of Henry III. In
1227-8 four oaks were given to William Avenel, who is described in the grant as waiting on the
king of Scotland ; two to the leper hospital of Chesterfield ; six to the priory of Blyth ; six to the
canons of Newark ; and three to the priory of Thurgarton.3 Such gifts to religious houses often
specify that the trees were for works then in progress of their churches or conventual buildings.
Occasionally the gifts from this forest consisted of ready-trimmed timber. Thus, in 1228, the king
sent twenty tie-beams (copulas) from Sherwood to the church of the distant priory of Wormgay,
Norfolk ;4 and in 1229 forty rafters (ckevrones) to the abbot and canons of Croxton.5 A single
oak was also sent in the latter year into Norfolk, to one Richard de St. John, chaplain of Henry de
Burgh ; the bailiff was directed to fell one as near as possible to the Trent, as it had to reach
Norfolk by water carriage.6 In the same year another single oak was granted to the prior of
Blyth to make a door for his hall.7 William Bardulf in 1231 had a grant from Sherwood of
twenty tree trunks suitable for timber (fusta ad maeremium inde faciendum)*
Henry III also dealt generously with the deer of Sherwood Forest, his gifts being chiefly
from the fallow deer. In 1229 the king gave two does to Beatrice, wife of Walter de Evermuth,
constable of Lincoln Castle ; ten does and a brocket to John, constable of Chester, to be placed in
his park of Dunyton ; ten does and two bucks to Hugh Despencer towards stocking his park at
Loughborough ; and twenty does and two bucks for the bishop of Carlisle's park at Melbourne.9 In
1 230-1, twenty-five more does and seven bucks were sent to Despencer's park at Loughborough, and
the bishop of Lincoln received twelve does and three bucks towards the stocking of his park at
Stow.10
The royal gifts of deer from different parts of Sherwood from 1231 to 1234 included three
does to Robert de Lexinton ; three bucks and four does to the earl of Huntingdon ; five bucks and
twenty does to the bishop of Carlisle for his park at Melbourne ; three bucks to the dean of
St. Martin's, London ; six bucks to Walter de Evermuth ; two bucks and eight does to Hugh
Despencer ; a buck to John son of Geoffrey ; two harts to John de Stuteville ; two bucks to Robert
de Hareston ; seven bucks to the bishop of Carlisle ; five bucks to William of York ; three bucks
to William Bardulf ; five bucks and a hart to William de Albini, and ten bucks to the bishop of
Lincoln.11
1 Exch. K.R. Accts. ig£. » As to the Regard, see Cox, Royal Forests, p. 1 1.
Close, 12 Hen. Ill, m. 14. « Ibid. m. 9.
Ibid. 13 Hen. Ill, m. 4. • Ibid. 14 Hen. Ill, m. 20.
Ib;<*. 8 Ibid. 15 Hen. Ill, m. 7.
Ibid. 13 Hen. Ill, m. 4, i ; 14 Hen. Ill, m. 22.
Ibid. 14 Hen. Ill, m. 8 ; 15 Hen. Ill, m. 4, I.
" Ibid. 16 Hen. Ill, m. 18, 19, 14,6, 3, 2 ; 17 Hen. Ill, m. II, 7, 3 ; i8Hen.III,m. 15, n, 9,6.
37°
FORESTRY
During a like period the gifts of wood from Sherwood included five oaks to Gilbert Spigurnel,
for making a mill ; five oaks and thirty tie-beams to Simon, chaplain of Hugh de Burgh ; thirty
oaks to the prior and monks of Lenton, suitable for timber for the works of their church ; twenty
oaks to Brian de Insula ; five lime trees (tei/z) to the Franciscan friars of Nottingham, for making
their stalls ; thirty oaks to William de Kirkham, dean of St. Martin's, London, for timber for the
works of his chancel at Elm ; forty rafters to brother Robert de Dyva ; ten oaks to Robert Lupus,
and fifteen oaks to William de Albini for making rafters.1 Numerous examples could also be given
of the gifts of Edward I from this forest.
The royal warrants of this period for Sherwood venison, or of deer for park-stocking, are fairly
frequent. The king kept Easter, 1276, at Lincoln, and orders were issued on 13 March for fifteen
Sherwood does to be supplied at that season for royal use, in addition to twelve bucks from Galtres Forest.2
Adam de Everingham was ordered, in September, 1277, to supply Richard Folyot with two live
bucks and ten live does towards stocking his park at Grimeston ;3 and in 1279 eight does and four
bucks were supplied to William de Colwick to help to stock his park at Colwick.4
Two ecclesiastics were the special recipients of favours from the great Nottingham forest.
Edward I was much attached to the two younger sons of Walter Bek, baron of Eversley, Thomas
and Anthony. Both were king's clerks, and both eventually obtained high promotion. Thomas,
the second son, was consecrated bishop of St. David's in 1280. On Christmas Day of the following
year Edward I granted him four live bucks and eight live does towards stocking his park at Pleasley,
on the Derbyshire fringe of the forest. On the same day a royal letter was dispatched to the forest
justices ordering them not to molest the bishop on account of four bucks taken by him in the
previous autumn, when passing through this forest, as the king had sanctioned this action by word
of mouth. In 1283 the same bishop was granted twelve good oaks for timber out of these woods.
Anthony Bek, the third son, the celebrated bishop of Durham, was a still greater favourite of
Edward I. In 1282 twenty good oaks were granted him out of Sherwood for the construction of
his house at Somerton, and also four bucks and eight does towards stocking his park at Rothwell.
In the following year he received further timber and live deer. The king, as a special mark of his
favour, at the time of Anthony's consecration to the bishopric of Durham in 1284, forwarded to
the bishop the largest grant out of Sherwood Forest of which there is record, namely ten live bucks
and twenty live does.6
The custom of making royal warrant grants of timber or venison died out, save for a very few
exceptions, with the reign of Edward II. The Close Rolls of that reign yield, however, interesting
particulars with regard to the six Sherwood verderers. These officials, who presided at the forest
courts, were, as has been stated, responsible to the crown ; they were elected by the county court for
life, but could be removed by the crown for incapacity, lack of property qualification within the
jurisdiction, etc. In 1309 a writ de viridario ellgendo was addressed to the sheriff of Nottingham
ordering the election of a Sherwood verderer in the place of the recently chosen Robert Joste, who
was insufficiently qualified. In August, 1311, the sheriff was instructed to see to the election of
another verderer in the place of Richard de Byngham, deceased. In November, 1312, an election
was ordered to fill the place of Nicholas de Wydmarpole, as he had no lands within the forest
limits, nor did he dwell therein. Sampson de Estrebley was removed from the office of verderer of
the king in 1313 in consequence of unfitness. In this same year the king removed Peter Foun
from his verderership, because he was found to be insufficiently qualified and unfit. The late sheriff
had caused Peter to be suddenly elected in the place of Nicholas de Wydmarpole, although Nicholas,
as the king subsequently found out, had sufficient lands within the forest and was a useful and fit
man for the position. A writ to the sheriff of a like character in 1314 gave longer reasons for the
removal of John de Ludham, for it stated that John did not continuously dwell within the county,
and was so occupied with the affairs of divers men that he could not attend to his duties as verderer.
Nicholas de Wydmarpole was reinstated in 1313, but he did not hold the office long, for he was
again removed in the following year, being incapacitated by infirmity ; he is described as suffering
from such incurable infirmity that 'sometimes he cannot leave his house without great risk to his life,
and has remained continuously indoors for four months.' Thomas de Langevillers was removed in
1314 on account of having no lands in the county ; Robert de Pirpoint for insufficiency in 1315 ;
John Doylly for age and infirmity in 1318 ; and John Bilthewater of Edwinstowe and John
Annesley for like causes in 1322." Similar writs affecting the Sherwood verderers also occur from
time to time throughout the reign of Edward III.
When the Parliament was held at Lincoln at the beginning of the year 1316 great provision of
wood was made from Sherwood. The archbishopric of York was then vacant and in the king's
hands, and Edward II ordered in January the keeper of the forest to deliver to the sheriff of
1 Close, 16 Hen. Ill, m. 14, 12, II, 3 ; 17 Hen. Ill, m. 6 ; 18 Hen. Ill, m. 26, 19, 18, 16.
1 Ibid. 4 Edw I, m. 13. ' Ibid. 5 Edw. I, m. 3.
4 Ibid. 7 Edw. I, m. 4. 5 Close and Pat. R. Edward I, passim,
* Close R. temp. Edward II, passim.
371
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Nottingham fifty leafless oaks from the archbishop's wood of Blidworth, to be used for charcoal and
for boards for dressers (tabulis ad dressoria) ; also thirty oaks from the king's woods in the forest near
the Trent for firewood for the king's hall, and thirty more for the king's chamber, against the
ensuing Parliament. The wood was to be felled by the sheriff, carried to Lincoln, and there
delivered to the clerk of the king's scullery.1
The owners of woods within a royal forest had no power of felling timber or cutting
underwood therein, save under direct warrant. In 1316 Edward II permitted Ralph de Crumb well
to fell and sell, whither he will, twenty acres of his wood of Lambley, within the bounds of Sherwood
Forest, in compensation for the losses sustained by him in the king's service in Scotland.2
The oaks of Sherwood were always held in good repute when choice timber was required.
When Edward II was preparing, at the close of the year 1324, for the expedition into the duchy
of Aquitaine, the sheriff of Nottingham was directed to supply nine springalds and a thousand
quarels. These springalds were military engines of the catapult kind, constructed to discharge heavy
arrows or quarels with iron heads. The sheriff was instructed to prepare the springalds so that some
of them should be capable of discharging quarels of the length of three-quarters of a yard and others
of five-eights of a yard. The justice of the forest south of the Trent was ordered to suffer the
sheriff and his carpenters to have as many oaks and other trees fit for timber out of Sherwood Forest
as were deemed necessary for the construction of these engines.3
A curious case of forest claims outside the limits arose in 1338. John de Wyne had a pasture
called Fulwood, in Pinxton and Normanton, partly in Nottinghamshire and partly in Derbyshire.
It was near to the town of Kirkby, and about a mile from the field of Kirkby, which was a mete of
the forest. Although well outside the limits according to the perambulation, the deputy of the
keeper and other forest ministers, asserting that the pasture was forest, compelled John, by distraints
on his cattle, to pay a custom called wardefet for the king's use. On John's complaint a commission
was appointed in April, 1338, to hold an inquisition. This inquiry showed that the facts were as
stated, and Ralph de Nevill (the keeper) and his ministers were ordered not to intermeddle further
with the pasture. In the following year, however, further evidence came to light, particularly
that of the woodward elected by the township of Hucknell under Huthwaite, to the effect that
wardefet had in old days been claimed from Fulwood, and a further commission was appointed.
After an interval of nearly fifty years, the forest pleas for Sherwood were again held at
Nottingham. They were held in the spring of 1334, before Ralph de Nevill, Richard de
Aldborough, and Peter de Middleton.4 The number of venison presentments at this eyre was 119,
which was but a small amount considering the long period since the last court. In several cases
there was no definite charge of deer-slaying, or even of being found with dogs or bows, but simply
of trespass. Such trespass would be by strangers at night or during the fence month. Some of the
transgressors, as was usually the case, were of good position. Such were John lord de Grey, who
was found in the Bestwood enclosure with bows and six greyhounds running a herd of hinds (herdum
bissarum), of which he killed two ; and Henry Curson of Breadsall, who killed a hind in Clipston Wood.
The roll of amercements of persons convicted of vert trespass at the attachment courts at
more than \d., and who could only be amerced at the eyre, was presented to the justices. This
roll embraced about 750 trespasses, varying in value from 6d. for honey found in an oak, or for boughs
and trunks, to 2s. for a single oak. These values had been already paid to the verderers at the
time when the attachment court was held, and the additional fines imposed by the justices varied
from is. to 2s. In each case the name of two who had been bound over to secure the trespasser's
appearance follows the entry of the offence.
It is scarcely surprising to find, after the very long interval since the last eyre, that some of the
verderers' rolls of the different attachment courts were missing. Those for 1288, 1289, 1290,
and 1291 were not forthcoming. The fines imposed in 1334 upon the defaulting verderers or their
heirs amounted to £20 8s. 2d.
At this eyre the forest ministers were asked upon their oath to state from what person or persons
the foresters were wont to receive and have their living. In reply they cited from an inquest
held in 1289, shortly after Edward I had removed Robert de Everingham from his bailiwick as
hereditary forester, stating his extensive perquisites and privileges. It is interesting to note a
particular difference between the privileges there cited and those already named of the time of
Richard I. There is no mention of a skep of salt from the salt carts going through the forest, but
he had an average of 2OJ. a year on the carriage of millstones. Robert de Everingham, as chief
forester, also held ten knights' fees of the king, but he was exonerated from that charge in return
for finding foresters at his own cost. It therefore followed, after the keepership was forfeited to
the crown, that the foresters were to continue to be paid by whomsoever the crown should appoint
as keeper.
1 Close, 9 Edward II, m. 20. ' Ibid. 10 Edward II, m. 18.
1 Ibid. 1 8 Edward II, m. 21. « For. Proc. Tr. of Rec. No. 132.
372
FORESTRY
As the forest justices were so seldom on circuit, they seem to have been all the more determined
to exact appearances whenever the eyre was held. The whole of the free tenants of the forest were
bound to attend the pleas. On the opening day three of them were absent. John Bardolf
successfully pleaded that he had not received his letter of summons, but Adam de Everingham was
fined 1 5*., and Joan widow of Ralph de Burton 6s. 8^., for their absence. The reeves and four-
men of each township within the bounds had also to be present. On the first day William
Goodrych and William de Normanton, both of Lenton, were fined collectively y. 4^., whilst
William Router, the reeve of Basford, had to pay 2s. Before the eyre was closed the justices issued
a series of pardons for both venison and vert offences. Amongst the eighteen pardoned were John
le Bret, rector of Annesley, and the vicar of Edwinstowe.
Between the times of holding eyres the crown not infrequently intervened with pardons for
venison and vert trespasses. Thus between the eyres of 1287 and 1334 (to cite only two or three
Sherwood examples) Edward I pardoned William Simpson, parson of the church of Epperstone, in
1295, of both vert and venison trespass j1 the abbot of Thornton, in 1305, for felling eight oaks
beyond the number granted ;3 and Edward II pardoned John de Sandwyce and others in 1308 for
taking two harts and a buck.3
There was not a single royal forest wherein various religious houses had not special rights
granted them of fuel and other wood, of pannage or agistment, and sometimes of venison. Nor
was there hardly any royal forest to be found, within whose bounds one or more monasteries were
not established. Sherwood is a striking instance. Surrounded on all sides by the forest stretches
were the Cistercian monks of Rufford and the Austin canons of Newstead. On its northern verge
were the white canons of Welbeck, the most famous Premonstratensian house in England, and a
little further afield the Austin canons of Worksop, the Benedictine monks of Blyth, and the
Benedictine nuns of Wallingwell. On its western margin were the Carthusian monks of Beau
Vale, and the Austin canons of Felley ; on the south-eastern flank were the two other small Austin
houses of Thurgarton and Shelford, whilst at the southern extremity was the powerful house of
Cluniac monks of Lenton. Every one of these monasteries had certain Sherwood forest privileges,
some small and some great, as well as a few other houses situated outside the county bounds.
Thus the nuns of Wallingwells might send their wood cart once a week to collect windfallen
wood for their hearth and oven, whilst the RufFord monks could have wood for almost any purpose
they desired. Or, again, the canons of Felley could turnout their swine at certain seasons to fatten
on the acorns and beech mast, whilst the Lenton monks had a right to a tithe of the whole of
the venison killed throughout the forest. Besides, too, their definite chartered rights, which had to
be substantiated at every recurrence of the forest pleas, our kings were often ready, particularly
in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, to grant the religious temporary forest grants. To take
only a few examples of Edward I's Sherwood forest grants of this description, we find that the
king, in 1279, licensed the prior of Newstead to fell and sell 40 acres of his own wood;4 and in
the next year the abbot of RufFord had license to clear out a trench, 40 ft. wide, round his own
wood, and make his profits out of the wood and underwood.5 In 1300 the same king licensed the
abbot of RufFord to sell the windfalls (cabliecium) of his woods, and in 1304 to fell and sell
40 acres.6 The prior of Newstead had leave in 1304 to enclose and cultivate 1, 800 acres of the
forest waste of Linby ;7 and in 1305 the prior of Felley was granted the tithes of all the assarts
(clearances) in the hays of Linby, Rumewood, and Wellow, that had been assarted in the king's reign.8
It is greatly to the credit of the religious of these monasteries that they were hardly ever
presented for any form whatever of venison trespass, though this can by no means be said of their
secular brethren, the beneficed clergy of Sherwood and the neighbourhood.9
In the reign of Edward IV, and subsequently, various appointments of king's foresters of
Sherwood are entered on the patent rolls at a wage of 4^. a day. In 1474 John Stanbridge, a
yeoman of the king's chambers, was granted for life the office of the custody of the king's lodge of
Immeslowe in the north bailiwick and of being one of the foresters there, to hold by himself or
deputy agreeable to the master of the game, with wages of \d. a day out of the issues of Mansfield
in the forest ; but the appointment and wage were not to be taken as a precedent. But later in the
same month there was a like life appointment by the crown of a forester in the south bailiwick ; he
received a similar wage, and in addition to being a forester was also made keeper of the king's deer
at Langton Arbour.10
1 Pat. 23 Edw. I, m. 3. 3 Ibid. 33 Edw. I, m. 15. " Ibid. 2 Edw. II, pt. ii, m. 25.
4 Ibid. 7 Edw. I, m. 2. s Ibid. 8 Edw. I, m. 6. 6 Ibid. 28 Edw. I, m. 15 ; 32 Edw. I, m. 5.
7 Ibid. 32 Edw. I, m. 5. 8 Ibid. 33 Edw. I, m. 6.
9 So far as the evidence of the Pleas of the Forest is concerned, the monks throughout England were but
very rarely poachers, contrary to the usual belief. Probably not a score of cases could be found against them in
all the stores of the Public Record Office.
10 Langton Arbour, in Blidworth parish, is now known as Blidworth Dale.
373
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
In 1531 Henry VIII appointed a commission, consisting of the abbot of Welbeck, Sir
Richard Sacheverell, Sir Brian Stapleton and Sir John Villers, knights, and John Hersey and Roger
Greenhaghe, esquires, to view and certify the number and state of the deer in the forest and park of
Sherwood. The returns show that there were at that time 4,280 red deer, and 1,131 fallow deer.
The fallow deer were within the parks of Bestwood, Nottingham, Clipston, and Thorney Wood.
The red deer ranged throughout the forest, save for 214 in Bestwood Park. In the com-
missioners' detailed certificate, ' as signed by me John, bishop of Elphyn, commendatory of the abbey
of Welbeck,' the red deer were apportioned to the following forest divisions : ' Clypston Shroggys,'
310 ; 'Billey and Brykkeland,' 223 ; ' Romewood and Olsland,' 60 ; ' Farmsfeyld,' 63 ; ' Blyd-
worth,' 128; 'Calverton,' 146; ' Papilwike,' 73 ; ' Lymbe Hawis Walke,' 30; ' Simon Woddys
Walke,' 90 ; ' Lyndhurst Walk,' 114 ; and ' Nomanys Wode,' I48.1
A forest session was held at Ollerton on 3 June, 1538. Among the higher officials, Thomas,
earl of Rutland, is named as master of the game, and Sir John Byron as keeper of Bestwood
Park and forester of Thorney. Eleven other foresters, thirty-five woodwards, fourteen regarders,
three verderers, and the constables and ' four-men ' of twenty-eight townships are all specified as
being in attendance.
The large majority of the constables and ' four-men ' of different towns stated on their
corporal oath that they ' doth knowe nothing that is to the disturbance of the kyng, his game, or
woode within the seid foreste.' Among the exceptions may be quoted the two following presentments
from Mansfield :
' Item, the Constable and Fowermen of the townshippe of Mannsefelde sayeth that one
Christofer Shutte, Gerves Herdy, and one William Falcherde dothe kepe in their howses moo
Fyres than of right they ought to do, wherebye the kynge his woode is destroyed extendyng every
yere to three score lodes contrarie the Statute of the Forest.'
' Item, that one Richarde Swynesloo, Thomas Clerke, Christofer Bradeshawe (and five others)
dothe staff-hyrde theire sheep of the Kyng his Common the number of twelve score where the
Kyng his deare shulde have their peacablie Feadyng.'
The jury of freemen of the town of Nottingham presented the names of four burgesses, each
of whom owned a greyhound, but stated that they only kept them for the purpose of hunting
hares and foxes in the forest (to which they had a chartered right), and not for the disturbance
of the king's game. The justices accepted their plea as to the motive for keeping the greyhounds.
They also made two orders affecting the forest wood — firstly, that no hedgebote nor firebote was
to be taken without the deliverance of the woodward, nor any housebote without the deliverance of
the keeper as well as the woodward ; and secondly, that no one was to fell any of his own wood
for any intent ' withoute the especiall lycense of the kynge his highness, or the Justice of the
Foreste, and that none from hencesforthe do take aine woode for bleaching.'2
A return at the Public Record Office that was made in 1538 of all the deer in the king's
forests and parks north of the Trent, gives the number of red deer in Sherwood Forest as about 1,000 ;
in Bestwood Park, there were 700 fallow, and 140 red ; in Clipston Park, 60 fallow, and 20 red ;
and in Grynley park, 150 fallow.
A perambulation of the forest was made on 9 September, 1539, beginning at the castle of
Nottingham, and returning to Nottingham.3
In 1599, Elizabeth granted the keepership of the forest district of Thorney wood to the north
of Nottingham, to John Stanhope, with free leave of hunting, chasing, and killing ' the Queene's
wild beastes ' without being molested by any forest ministers or others, provided he always provided
IOO deer for the use of the queen.4
A survey of Sherwood Forest taken in 1609 gave the following estimate of the acreage : —
Inclosures . . . 44,839 Clipston Park . . . 1,583
Woods .... 9,486 Bestwood Park . . . 3,672
Unenclosed . . . 35,080 Bulwell Park . . . 326
Nottingham Park . . 129
89,405
There were at that time 21,009 oak trees m Birkland, and 28,900 in Bilhagh, or a total of
49,909 ; the majority of them were even then past maturity. It may here be mentioned, as
showing the rapid diminution that went on from that date, that in 1686 the oaks of Birkland
and Bilhagh numbered 37,316, and in 1790 they were reduced to io,U7.6
A fragmentary return of presentments, ' by the view and regard ' of the forest in 1606, gives a
long list of purprestures or encroachments, among which may be mentioned, under Mansfield, 'One
by ye Earle of Scarsdale by building a Forge near Randenthorp and turning ye river Naiden out of
Exch. Misc. Bk., Ixxvi. There is much variation in different deer estimates of this reign.
' Cox, Royal Forests, 216-17. 3 It is set forth at length in Bailey, Jnnals (ii, 405-7).
Fourteenth Rep. of Woods and Forests (1793), App. 22. 6 Ibid. p. 4.
374
FORESTRY
its course it being a bound of ye Forest ' ; under Oxton, ' one by Wm. Savile, gent., by turningye
river Doverbeck out of its antient course' ; under Rufford, 'one by Francis Biggs there called the
New Inn,' and under Bulwell, ' one by a paper mill in ye tenure of Ralph Smith, gent.' 1
In 1616 there were 1263 red deer in Sherwood Forest in addition to those in Thorney Wood ;
whilst an estimate of 1635 made the total 1,367*
There was an unusual long drought in the summer of 1624, which helped to bring about a
destructive forest fire of vast extent. On 23 August some ill-slacked charcoal that was being carried
away fell upon some ling that at once blazed up, and ere long the conflagration spread with such
rapidity that the fire was four miles in length and one and a half in breadth. An eye witness
describes a thick mist of smoke over Newark, which was seven or eight miles from the scene of the
fire. An army of men, with spades and picks and shovels turned out to try and stop its progress
with trenches. Most providentially the wind abated and changed its course just as the fire was ap-
proaching the northern end of the great long wood that then stretched from Mansfield to Nottingham.3
During the Commonwealth there was much disorder and aggression throughout Sherwood
Forest. Many old rights and privileges, particularly if exercised by those who took the king's side,
were abrogated, whilst many onslaughts were made both on vert and venison by multitudes of the
smaller folk of the adjoining districts. At the Restoration, the king and his council were beset by
the claims of those who rightly or wrongly alleged their forestal rights. Charles II on recovering
his throne showed much interest in replenishing with game the forest and parks that had been
wasted during the Civil War and Commonwealth. A warrant was signed in November, 1661, for
the payment of j£i,ooo to Sir William St. Ravy, for the expenses of transporting red and fallow
deer from Germany to help to restock the forests of Sherwood and Windsor.4 In the following
year an order was made, in order to repair the destruction of the deer in Thorney Wood and
Sherwood Forest, that no fee deer of any kind were to be taken until further warrant.5
Early in 1662, Charles II issued the necessary authority under letters patent to investigate the
Sherwood claims to his old and faithful friend William earl of Mansfield and marquis of Newcastle
(afterwards known as ' the loyal Duke '), appointing him to act as lord chief justice in eyre.
The business was so complicated and required so much legal investigation that William Cavendish
presided over this forest court, either in person or by commission, for upwards of twelve years.6
The court, which was held at Mansfield, opened on 6 February, 1662—3 > rePeated
adjournments carried on the proceedings up to 1676. The first claim made was that of the
archbishop of York, who appeared by proxy in the person of John Rolleston. A long array of
ancient chartered privileges, from the days of Richard I onwards, was put in on his grace's behalf,
and their force acknowledged by a specially sworn jury. The next in order was Sir George Savile,
bart., of RufFord, who also appeared by proxy, claiming the privileges formerly held by the
Cistercian Abbey. Other claims were those of Arthur Capel, earl of Essex ; George duke of
Buckingham, the president of the court ; Patrick Viscount Chaworth, Richard Lord Byron (the
second lord of that name claiming for Newstead Priory rights), John Lord Clare, the earl and
countess of Devonshire, Sir William Dalston, Sir Tamworth Reresby, and Sir Humphrey Molineux.
There were also a vast number of minor claimants, who came from all parts of the forest and
its surroundings ; these humbler folk appeared in person, or through the attorneys they had clubbed
together to pay. Some of them seem to have been unable to resist the attractions of the game, as
they made their way through the forest glades. Thomas Cotton, of Edwinstowe, blacksmith, was
convicted of shooting a hart whilst journeying to attend the court. He was fined 40*., and had to
find a mainpernour or bondsman (in the person of Francis Biggs, innkeeper of RufFord), who entered
into a recognizance of £20 for Thomas's good behaviour towards His Majesty's game for the
twelvemonth next ensuing.
In 1675 the marquis of Newcastle issued the following warrant : —
Forasmuch as I am informed there are many disorderly persons dwelling in or neare who have and
keep greyhounds, setting dogs, lurchers, gunns, nettes, and other ingins for the destruction of the deer,
fowl, fish, hares, rabbits, partridges, peasants, powtes, and other moor game, whereby the game in the
forest is much destroyed and disturbed. For the preservation thereof these are to authorise and require
the Rt. Honble. John Viscount Rochford, headkeeper and forester of the walk called Blidworth Walk, by
all means to inhibit all such persons as shall thus enter the said forest.
The people of Blidworth came out strongly for Charles I, and Charles II, with unusual gratitude,
gave them the 'small wode' within their walk. They put, however, too generous an interpretation
on the word ' small," and as this grant also led to poaching it was cancelled.
1 Exch. K.R. Accts. s^-. A damaged paper book, consisting now of seven folios.
' Ibid. App. 24. * Roy. MS. A. xviii, f. 24.
4 Cal. o/S.P. Dom. Chas. II, xliv, 43, 103. 5 Ibid. vol. Ivi, 122.
s The official story of this last Forest Court is told in detail in a large contemporary MS. book, now in
possession of Captain Sherbrooke, R.N. of Oxton Hall, near Blidworth. The contents are of much value and
interest, but space can only be found for a few short abstracts and extracts.
375
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
One destructive practice occupied much of the attention of this court. Forest officers were
paid in kind, and each had an annual ' fee tree ' ; but as each officer possessed the right, or had
acquired the custom, of selecting his own, every year saw the depletion of the finest timber.
The two following documents, one an order, the other an attestation, pertain to this
question. ' Ordered that Richard Grammar, woodward of the Blidworth Office, belonging to his
grace the archbishop of York, shall have licence to fell and take away one tree in any of his grace's
woods in the forest of Sherwood, for his fee tree in the execution of his office.' Lord Byron had to
make the following assurance : ' These are to certify whom it may concerne that I had fee tree
allowed me out of the Forest of Sherwood every yere whilst I was bowbearer of the saide forest.'
It would be an error altogether inadmissible to suppose that this Sherwood Forest Court, as well
as those of earlier date, concerned themselves only with feudal lords and owners. It was also the
great and legally organized engine for the protection of the poorer sort in their common rights. In
the parish of Blidworth an intense forestal spirit prevailed, even the humblest inhabitant having all
kinds of privileges, such as gathering windfallen wood, housebote, haybote, and the keep of so many
animals. One great duty of the court was to preserve the privilege of water, a claim of much value in
the sandy soil of Sherwood. The wells and sykes were open ' omnibus animalibus, omnibus temporibus
anni, omnimodo, porcis, anseribus, capris l duntaxat exceptis.' There was a distinction almost
ethnological between the true sylvico/a or forest-dweller and the mere ' purley man ' — a distinction
not wholly obliterated — that is between him who enjoyed the pleasure and restrictions of Sherwood,
and the inferior being whose hard luck it was to be born and pass his life en pur lieu in the void
and open space around.2
To a certain extent the court concerned itself with the system of agriculture known as bricks,
which was pursued in some of the more fertile spots. Inhabitants of Blidworth, etc., banded
together to obtain a lease from some of the forest dignitaries, with the consent of the superior
lord, under which farming might be carried on after a fashion inadmissible in the stricter days of
forest law. These enclosures called ' brecks,' or portions ' broken up,' were let at small rentals, one
reason being the necessity of high and strong hedges, for which haybote was allowed, to prevent
incursions of forest animals, restraint of which in their semi-wild condition was very difficult. An
illustration lies at hand in a petition conceded and signed by Toby Mathew, archbishop of York.
Certain parishioners ask him, as lord of the manor, permission to make a breck of 20O acres. If
he will grant the prayer they ' promise, of their thankfulness unto your grace for this yore grete
bountie and good favour, they will be redie at your grace's resydynge at Southwell to help with
their droghtes to furnish yore provision, by leadynge of wood and lynge as you shall make them
liable. And they, and all theires (as otherwise they have), shall prayse and pray God for the long
contynewance of yre Grace to the good of hys church and this commonwealth.'
Under the Commonwealth, and subsequently, a large number of Sherwood oaks were felled for
the navy; but various grants were made for exceptional purposes during that period and immediately
after the Restoration. About 1680, the inhabitants of Edwinstowe petitioned the crown for
permission to fell 200 oaks of the value of £200, out of the hays of Birkland and Bilhagh for the
repair of their parish church, then in a ruinous condition. The petition was entertained, and on a
survey for that purpose it was found that ' although there were standing many thousand trees, few
of which there were but what were decaying, and very few useful for the navy.' 3
It should not be forgotten that the largest and most substantial of the beams used by Sir
Christopher Wren in the construction of St. Paul's came from Sherwood Forest. Among the
papers at Welbeck Abbey is a letter from the great architect to the steward of the duke of
Newcastle, dated 4 April, 1695, referring to 'the noble benefaction' promised by the duke in
1693, and sending the measurements of the 'great Beames ' then required. They were to be
'47 ft. long, 13 inches and 14 inches at the small end, .... and of growing timber, and as near
as can be without sap.' 4
In 1708 a representative meeting of the gentlemen of the north of the county was held at
Rufford, at which a strongly-worded petition was adopted, addressed to the crown, complaining of
' the grievous and almost intolerable burden we labour under by reason of the numerous increase of
the red deer in the forest of Sherwood these late years.' They complained that so many of the
The keeping of goats was prohibited throughout the forest, as they were so offensive to the deer.
The purlieus of a forest were, as a rule, those outbounds of a forest which had been disafforested in the
time of John or Hen. Ill ; these districts were not under regular forest law, but nevertheless their tenants
had to submit without any redress to the ravages of deer and game in general. As a rule, too, the privileges
of purlieu men were quite trivial as compared with the forest tenants ; consequently their position was
generally regarded as most undesirable. Particularly was this the case on the eastern confines of Sherwood
Forest. To call a man 'a purley' is yet a term of some opprobrium in the district. Blidworth was forestal,
but Farnsfield was purlieu, and a native of the former will still occasionally speak contemptuously of the latter
as a ' mere purley,' or ' youre nobbut purley,' though ignorant of its signification.
1 Cox, Royal Forest!, 218. < White, Worksop and Sherwood. Forest, 149-50.
376
FORESTRY
woods had been granted or given away by the queen's predecessors that there was but little harbour
left for the deer in the forest, and the deer in consequence were distributed all over the county,
eating up the corn and grass ; that their tenants had often to watch all night to keep the deer off ;
that their servants were terrified by several new keepers made by the present deputy-warder, who
'threaten them if so much as they do set a little dog at the deer though in the corn'; that not only
had they to watch their cornfields, where the deer often lay nine or ten brace together, but they so
destroy private woods as to injure them to the extent of from £10 to £50 a year.
At the same time another petition was addressed to the House of Commons with about 400
signatures, wherein it was stated that the number of red deer in the forest, 'till very lately, had
never or seldom exceeded three hundred, which was a great number, considering the barrenness of
the soil and the great destruction of the woods, as the forest could maintain.' In the light of other
evidence this estimate, used for the sake of strengthening the petitioners' arguments, was probably
much below the mark. The petitioners proceeded to state that these deer now numbered more
than 900 ; that they roamed over the country to find sustenance, but more particularly that these
depredations were chiefly carried on in ' the division called Hatfield and the whole district of the
Clay ; and that these parts of the county were outside the forest limits according to the perambulation
and inquisition of Edward I.' This petition met with no favour, for it was argued, though
incorrectly, that the owners had never before been asked to stint the number of deer, and that it was
a request to Parliament to take away the queen's liberty and right without her consent. On a copy
of this petition still extant is endorsed : —
'Tis no doubt but that if there were no more than fifty deer in the whole forest, and if it should
happen that they were on any one particular man's two or three acres of corn or turnips, they would
be sure to lessen his crops ; yet he bought the land with the encumbrance, and it is past all dispute
that the queen has as much right to it as any man has to his own coat.'
The forest was no source of profit in Anne's reign. Contrariwise ^1,000 a year was granted
to maintain the deer and the new park at Clumber, and to hunt with two horsemen, forty couple of
hounds, eleven horses, and four grooms. There were four ' forest keepers,' and four ' deputy
purlieu rangers ' ; the winter hay for the deer averaged £100 a year.
In the eighteenth century the open forest area was continuously decreasing, partly by grants in
the northern part for parks, but still more by the enclosure acts of the latter part of the century.
Between 1789 and 1796 inclusive acts were passed for the enclosure of Arnold Forest, Sutton in
Ashfield, Kirkby in Ashfield, and Lenton and Radford, whereby 8,248 acres were brought into
cultivation. Earlier in the reign of George III, enclosure acts of Blidworth (1,800 acres), Carlton
(220), Epperstone (70), Ollerton (500), and several others of smaller extent had enclosed yet more
of the open forest tracts.2
In 1793 the Commissioners of Woods and Forests and Land Revenues of the Crown issued
their fourteenth report (70 folio pages) which dealt exclusively with Sherwood. They describe
it as the only forest remaining under the superintendence of the chief justice in eyre north of
Trent, or belonging to the crown in that part of England. The chief officials were the lord-
warden, the duke of Newcastle, by letters patent ; the bowbearer or ranger, Lord Byron, by the
lord-warden ; four verderers, elected by the freeholders ; and steward, John Gladwin, appointed
during pleasure by lord chief justice. There were also nine keepers of nine walks, appointed by
the verderers, each receiving a salary of 2OS. from the lord-warden. Two woodwards were
annually sworn for Sutton and Carlton. Each verderer and the steward received an annual fee tree
out of the hays of Birkland and Bilhagh. There were no deer in the forest save in Thorney
Woods, of which Lord Chesterfield (as hereditary successor to John Stanhope of Elizabeth's days)
was keeper ; but evidence was given of there having been a great many red deer in Birkland and
Bilhagh until about 1770, when they were killed ofF by the keepers of the dukes of Newcastle
and Kingston, assisted by the inhabitants, since which time the forest farms had proved much
more valuable, and the wheatfields no longer wanted guarding by horns in the daytime and by fires
at night. The four verderers at that time each demanded and obtained a fee buck and a fee doe
annually from Lord Chesterfield.
The accounts of particular ancient trees, or of special groups, as at Haywood, near Blidworth,
or in the beautiful glades of Birkland and Bilhagh, together with the recording of other forest
survivals, will be more appropriately discussed under their respective parishes in the topographical
section.
Though there was so much grievous destruction of timber in Sherwood Forest in the
1 White, Worktop and Sherwood Forest, 218—9. Cited chiefly from Bailey, Annals.
' General Rep. on Enclosures (1808). Nottingham had 88 enclosure acts in the first forty years of
George III, and was only surpassed in the acreage enclosed by Lincoln, Leicester, and Northampton. According
to the Agricultural Report of 1794 (App. v) there had been in that century 10,666 acres of private enclosures
from the forest and its borders.
377 48
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
seventeenth and following centuries, l there were some considerable compensations made in the second
half of the last of these centuries.
In the elaborate report on the county of Nottingham issued by the Board of Agriculture in 1 794,
there is a good deal of information as to the woods and plantations of the shire. It is there stated
that a spirit of planting had prevailed throughout much of the old Sherwood district for the last
forty years. Though at first fir trees were chiefly planted, it was found that the sandy soil seemed
well adapted for almost every kind of forest tree in the sheltered places. The duke of Newcastle
had recently planted 1848 acres in Clumber Park. Considerable particulars are given in appendices
as to the plantations on the VVelbeck and Ruffbrd estates, together with descriptions of the methods
adopted.
There was but little wood save hedgerow, and but little recent planting on the level lands of
the county that flank the Trent, save occasional ash growing. Thirty-one acres had been planted
with ash in 1771-2 on thecliff opposite Washford Ferry, in Flintham ; it had been cut in 1791-2
and had been sold standing for £1,300. In another instance six acres of ash that had been planted
for seventeen years sold for £70.
In the Clay district 3,664 acres had been planted in comparatively recent enclosures. There
was very little timber in the Vale of Belvoir district ; but mention is made of Bunny Wood, which
contained seventy acres. 2
In Major Rooke's Sketch of Sherwood Forest, printed in 1799, much praise is given to ' the many
respectable persons, whose mansions and parks border on the forest, who have made and continue
to make large plantations in honour of the splendid victories gained by our gallant admirals.' Such
were the twenty-five acres of forest trees and firs planted by Lord Newark, and called Howe Grove,
in honour of Earl Howe and his victory, as well as fifteen to the east of Thornley Park, called after
Lord St. Vincent, and twelve acres on the north called after Lord Duncan. He also particularly
mentions the extensive plantations of the duke of Portland in the neighbourhood of Welbeck; the
fine plantations at Ruffbrd by the Hon. R. Lumley Savile ; as well as the Howe, Spencer, Nelson,
St. Vincent, Warren, and Duncan groves planted by the Hon. F. Montague. Mr. Foljambe, of
Osberton, was one of several other Nottinghamshire gentlemen who were busily engaged in tree
planting towards the close of the eighteenth century. The marquis of Titchfield had sown up-
wards of a hundred acres in parts of the old forest, between Mansfield and Nottingham, with acorns.
Though the glories of Sherwood as a royal open forest have long since passed, various noble
parks occupy some of its choicest portions. They not only include much of the ancient timber,
but several are well stocked with red and fallow deer, which in some instances rightfully claim to be
the descendants of those that used to roam at will the forests and glades in mediaeval days.
The present deer parks in Nottingham only number five, all of which are in the old Sherwood
Forest district.3
Thoresby Park (Earl Manvers), one of the finest in the kingdom, has a circuit of upwards of
ten miles and an acreage of 2,000. In 1683 the crown sold 1,270 acres out of the hays of
Bilhagh and the White Lodge to be added to his own land to make the park of Thoresby. It is
grandly timbered in parts, particularly at the Buck Gate entrance, where there are many noble oaks.
The park is also noted for its Spanish chestnuts, and there are large picturesque stretches thickly
dotted with old thorns. The fallow deer number about 630 and the red deer 25.
Welbeck (duke of Portland) was the only one of the duke of Newcastle's eight parks that
escaped destruction at the time of the great Civil War. It has an acreage of 1640; the
timber is chiefly oak. Many of the trees are of great age, the oldest being the Greendale Oak .4
Two fine oaks, standing one each side of the roadway, are known as the Porters. Of the once
celebrated Seven Sisters, which had seven stems growing from a single root, only one stem is now
standing. There are about 500 fallow deer, including a herd of white ones, and 150 red deer.
Rufford Park (Lord Savile) extends over 500 acres ; it is well wooded, and contains some
particularly fine beech trees. The fallow deer number about 350.
Wollaton Park (Lord Middleton) covers 750 acres, and is well wooded with fine clumps of
forest trees. Its principal feature is the avenue of limes from the chief lodge to the hall. The
fallow deer number about three hundred. This park used to harbour a herd of wild white cattle,
of the polled or hornless breed, with black noses and ears. They died out in the first quarter of last
century.
Annesley Park (J. P. Chaworth-Musters, esq.) contains about 600 acres, and has a good deal
of large timber, though there are many bracken-covered stretches. There are about 200 head of
In Cox's Magna Britannia, issued in 1827, reference is made to ' the abominable destruction of the wood
made by the connivance or negligence of the woodwards (vol. iv. p. 171).
' Robert Low, General View of Agriculture of the County of Nottingham (1794), passim.
'he brief notes on these parks are taken from Whitaker, Deer Parks of England (1892) ; Shirley, Deer
and Deer Parks (1867); White, Worktop and Sherwood Forest (1875), and from personal observation.
1 The story of this ' Methusaleh of the Forest ' was told at length in Country Life (30 Dec. 1905) by Dr. Cox.
378
FORESTRY
fallow deer of the small black breed, supposed to be the original wild forest stock. There was a
herd of wild white cattle in this park at the time of Charles II.
The two most ancient parks of Sherwood, those of Clipston and Bestwood, are now no more.
Clipston, where was the ancient royal lodge visited, as is known, repeatedly by King John and also
by the first three Edwards, possessed a park which enclosed an area of 1,583 acres in 1609, and
seven miles in compass ; it was utterly destroyed in the Civil Wars. It had a pleasant river running
through it full of fish, was well stocked with deer, and so abounding in fine trees, ' the tallest in the
county,' that their value was estimated at £20,000. When 'the loyal duke' visited Clipston after
the Restoration there was not a single tree left standing in the park.1
The fate of Bestwood Park, a few miles north of Nottingham, between Papplewick and Arnold,
was somewhat similar, though not so severely treated. This ' mighty great park,' as Leland termed it,
comprised 3,672 acres, and 'before the troubles was well stocked with red deer,' but when
Thoroton wrote in 1677 much of it was ploughed up and divided into closes.2 The park that now
surrounds Bestwood Lodge is of very limited area.
Clumber Park (duke of Newcastle), the largest, and in some respects the most beautiful, of the
Nottinghamshire parks, which lies immediately to the north of Thoresby Park, is of comparatively
modern date, and used to be known as the New Park. The earl of Clare (afterwards created duke
of Newcastle) received the crown licence in 1707 to enclose and impark 3,000 acres at Clumber.
Low, writing in 1794, says of this park, then so luxuriant with its new plantation, that 'thirty
years ago it was a black heath full of rabbits.' But this only refers to the newly enclosed parts, for
he elsewhere states that Clumber Park included the remains of two woods of venerable oaks, known
as Clumber Wood and Hardwick Wood.3 The park now contains above 4,000 acres. By the
side of the large lake, cedars, pines, and various other coniferous trees grow to a great size.
The hays of Birkland and Bilhagh, the last remaining portion of the crown lands in Sherwood,
were sold to the duke of Portland about 1800, who subsequently parted with them to Earl Manvers.
Low, writing in 1794, describes these hays as an 'open wood of large oak, but mostly decayed or
stagheaded.'4
Newstead Park, formed after the dissolution of the religious houses, was beautifully wooded
and well stocked with fallow deer ; but it was broken up into farms, and most of this side of
the Sherwood district was very much denuded of trees during the concluding period of the Byron
regime. Towards the close of the eighteenth century, the Lord Byron of the day cut down the
oaks wholesale to the value of £60,000, and the bleak treeless aspect of the surroundings of the
abbey in 1814 are mentioned in the memoirs of John Murray. The poet Byron planted some
sparse copse-like spinneys such as Poet's Wood ; Castle Wood and Abbey Wood are somewhat
similar, and consist largely of beech. There are a few conifers (pinus sy/vestris and larch) on the
estate, which appear to have been planted before Colonel Wildman's time. The woods, copses,
spinneys, and clumps, when he took over the Newstead estate, were of small extent, and could
have been of little value as timber, actual or prospective. Colonel Wildman was an enthusiastic
arboriculturist, and did a great deal of planting, but it was not done on economical lines, and was
chiefly for aesthetic purposes. The fact of his keeping an enormous stock of rabbits absolutely
precluded any rational or scientific system of tree-growing. One wood planted by him north of
the Mansfield and Nottingham road was originally very well laid out ; but, owing to the fallacies
and defects inherent in the old British theories of sylviculture of the past century, it has been so
treated as to be of little actual value. The late Mr. Webb planted a very considerable acreage,
mainly of conifers. The woods were well designed and laid out ; but the technical planting was
badly done, and the young trees were not scientifically looked after during their early growth.
The ignorance, incompetence, and prejudices of woodmen and so-called foresters frustrated the
well-schemed projects and designs of Mr. Webb, whose knowledge in these matters was in
advance of the general knowledge and practice in England. A considerable portion of the
Newstead estate consists of arable land of the annual value of 5*. per acre downwards, much of
which should never have been reclaimed from forest for tillage. This was due, here as elsewhere,
to the economic conditions preceding the repeal of the Corn Laws.
Sir H. E. and Lady Chermside have of late years given much attention to the systems of
forestry in Germany and other countries. Their objective is to reconstitute the existing depleted
woodlands by the employment of 'jardinage' and other recognized methods of planting, and to add
to them by tree-culture on lands obviously better suited to such a purpose than to cereals or pasture.
One of the chief impediments to progress in this direction is found to be the very inefficient British
legislation concerning rabbits. The aggregate area of woodland, heath, and rough land on the
property is some 1,200 acres.5
1 Collins, Noble Families of Cavendish (1752), 42. * Thoroton, Notts. 258.
3 Gen. View of Agiic. of Notts. 9, 20. * Ibid. 19.
5 From the information of Sir H. E. Chermside, G.C.M.G., C.B.
379
A HISTORY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE
Considerable areas were planted in Welbeck Park and its environs, to clothe the landscape,
about the year 1726. At that time oak, Spanish chestnut, and beech were used for forming mixed
plantations, with, no doubt, firs and larch to act as nurses, as in some instances a few of these are
found among the hardwoods. At a later date oak was, probably from the high price of bark and
also from the demand of oak timber for ship-building, given the preference, with the view of forming
pure oak plantations. Unfortunately there is now a limited demand for bark, and timber must be
of excellent quality to find a sale. Even the casual observer will notice the superiority of trees
grown in the mixed woods, being more apparent when sufficient beech has been left to shade the
oak and chestnut ; under such conditions are the long clean stems grown which realize the highest
prices. Only in sheltered situations is the oak, when grown in pure forest, found attaining similar
dimensions in this neighbourhood. Good oak is grown with coppice on the clay lands, but coppice
can only pay in localities where there is a local demand for it.
The tendency to-day is in favour of plantations which will serve as suitable game coverts,
and thus a crop which will grow and mature quickly is often in request ; consequently firs and
larch are more generally planted as a crop than merely as nurses.
The age of the old oaks in Birklands which have at some time been pollarded, from a careful
count of the annual layers of growth, places the trees at 387 years of age, and owing to their being
pollards decay has set in from the top downwards, and in many cases they are badly affected with
the ring and star shake.1
There has been steady planting on the Duke of Newcastle's Clumber estates since 1889,
averaging about 26 acres a year, exclusive of the renewal of old woodland. This fresh land
planting of some 425 acres has chiefly been of a mixed character, larch and Scotch fir being
mingled with oak, beech, and sycamore. A certain small amount has been planted with Corsican
pine, and another plot with poplars. Six acres of bog land were planted with birch in 1895. A
plantation of 24 j acres of mixed larch, Scotch fir, oak, beech, and pine, laid out in 1902, was
appropriately named Coronation Plantation. This year (1906) three acres of old woodland at
Hardwick Wood Round have been planted with Japanese larch.8
During the last thirty years there have been planted on Earl Manvers's property in South
Nottinghamshire, 33 acres in the parish of Clipston-on-the-Wolds, and 1 8£ in the parish of Cotgrave.
The planting on the earl's North Nottinghamshire estate, in the like period, has been much more
considerable, namely, 194 acres in Edwinstowe, 204 in Budby-cum-Perlethorpe, 30 in Eakring,
26 in Kneesall, and 41 in Kersall. This gives a total on these estates of 646^ acres.3
On Lord Savile's Rufford Abbey estates there are now 1,700 acres of woods and plantations,
showing an increase of about 700 acres since the beginning of the nineteenth century.4
Particulars have been kindly supplied by Mr. Thomas W. Huskinson, F.S.I., land agent of
Epperstone, as to the planting on various smaller estates of the county under his agency, which
show considerable progress in arboriculture.5
1 From the information of Mr. Mitchie, the Duke of Portland's wood-steward.
1 From the information of Mr. Arthur V. Elliott, agent of the Duke of Newcastle.
* From the information of Mr. R. W. Wordsworth, agent of Earl Manvers.
4 From the information of Mr. J. A. Bell, agent of Lord Savile.
6 ' In my agency the following estates in Notts, have extensive woodlands :
The Oxton estate, Captain Sherbrooke, R.N., owner, four miles from Southwell. Old wood-
lands, 338 acres; oak and ash ; ash underwood ; thin timber. Plantation last fifty years 54 acres.
Total 392 acres, nearly all on the clays.
The Sherwood Lodge estate, Sir Charles Seely, bart., seven miles from Nottingham. Old
woodlands, 157 acres ; oak, chestnut, beech, and larch ; no underwood. Plantation, 365 acres ; of
this 1 50 acres only prepared for planting — not yet planted. Total 522 acres, all on sands.
Ossington estate, W. E. Denison, esq., eight miles from Newark. Old woodlands, 214 acres ;
ash underwood, oak and ash. Plantations, 67 acres. Total 281 acres, all on clays.
Winkburn estate, Colonel Burnell, eight miles from Newark. Old woodlands, 405 acres ;
well looked after ; oak with ash underwood.
Widmerpool estate, Major Robertson, nine miles south of Nottingham, on the wolds. Oak and
ash with hazel underwood. Old woodlands, 108 acres. Plantations, 60 acres, mostly larch and
spruce for game. Total 168 acres, all on clay.
The other estates in our management in this district all agricultural with only small coppices or
shelter plantations.
The estate duties on woodlands appear to me to be a mistake, as it is taxing a growing crop.
A tax on timber sales would be more equitable. As it is many people will be taxed for a property
in young woods that they never can enjoy.
Planting is generally done with trees transplanted from nurseries. This I consider an expensive
method, and doubt whether there is any industrial profit. If planting were to be done on a large
scale on the clays I would advocate sowing the seed of oak, ash, and sycamore on the ground
reserved for the wood just like a corn crop, and singling out each few years as the seedlings settle
380
FORESTRY
As to the Wold district of this county, south-east of the forest, on the five estates belonging to
Earl Manvers, Lord Helper, and Messrs. Robertson, Warner, and W. P. Paget, in the parishes of
Cotgrave, West Leake, Widmerpool, Wysall, and Normanton upon. Soar, at least 1,000 acres have
been tree-planted in the last thirty years. It is thought that the thinnings of these plantations, after
expenses of felling and sale are paid, amount annually to double the rent of a good deal of land in
Gotham, Bunny, and some other parishes that have not been planted.1
Official statistics are strongly confirmatory of the considerable growth of the wooded area of
Nottinghamshire in the last quarter of a century. In 1891 the woods of the county, exclusive of
plantations, covered 25,819 acres ; and the plantations — that is, those that have been planted during
the last fifteen years — covered an additional area of 2,027 acres. The total, therefore, in 1891 was
27, 846 acres. A great stride was made between that year and 1888, for in the latter year the total
was only 24,254.
The agricultural returns for 1895 give the area of wood, excepting plantations, as 27,269,
whilst the area of recent planting brought the full total up to 28,517.
The returns for the last decade, as estimated in June, 1905, show a further gain in Notting-
hamshire woodland of nearly 2,000 acres. It is there set forth as coppice 489 acres, plantations
1,404, and other woods 28,540, giving a total under woodland of 30,433 acres.
From all this varied information, Nottinghamshire may be safely placed among the compara-
tively few counties in which the woodlands have largely increased during the past hundred years.
But this increase is almost entirely due (save to a limited extent on the wolds) to what may be
termed the luxurious value of forest trees and coverts, that is to say, to the beauty of woodland land-
scape, and to its assistance in the maintaining of game. The initial difficulty in tree-planting on
private property, from a commercial standpoint, is the sinking of capital for such a distant and
somewhat problematical return, for most people live in the present. It is, therefore, generally thought
by those competent to form an opinion that a commercial return from arboriculture (save in
exceptional circumstances) can only be expected, under existing legislation, on suitable crown lands
or on those of such corporations as the Ecclesiastical Commissioners.
between themselves which is to be the best tree. I believe this method on a large enough scale would
pay a very good profit at the end of the century.
There should be no rating or taxation of woodlands till the crop is felled, when this burden
falls on the proper person alone able to bear it.
I advocate very strongly shelter plantations and trees on pasture lands, especially upland pastures
as a shelter for stock. I know from experience such pastures will carry stock two or three months
longer than more exposed fields in the immediate vicinity.'
1 From the information of the Hon. F. Strutt, to whom we are otherwise particularly indebted.
381
DA
670
N9V6
v.l
The Victoria history of the
county of Nottingham
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET
UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY