By Ralph Kilpin.
THE LIBRARY
OF
THE UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA
LOS ANGELES
THE OLD CAPE HOUSE
'first, an' it like you, the
house is a respected house.'
Measure for Measure
Act II. : Scene 1.
RT. HON. J. X. MERRIMAN. P.C., L.L.D. (b. 1841)
Member of the old Cape House from 1869 to '910. He
served in five out of the twelve Cape Ministries and was
Prime Minister at the date of Union.
photograph hy E. Peters (" Hood's St
") Captr Town.
The Old Cape House
Being pages from the
History of a Legislative
Assembly. 5* 3* *? &
By Ralph Kilpin,
Second Clerk- Assist ant of the
Union House of Assembly.
with a foreword by
TheRt.HonJ.X.Merriman,PC.,LLD.,M.LA.
CAPE TOWN: T. M ASKEW MILLER
TO THE MEMORY OF
Tbe,
FOUNDERS OF THE
OLD CAPE HOUSE
THIS BOOK IS DEDICATED.
.-* .«';• ' M
-. ^ .». j fc «.^
FOREWORD.
BY THE RT. HON. J. X. MERRIMAN,
P.C., LL.D., M.L.A.
AS one who has for fifty years occupied a seat
as a Member, first of the Parliament of the
Cape of Good Hope, and then of the Parlia-
ment of the Union of South Africa, I hail with pleasure
Mr. Kilpin's attempt to give a connected sketch of
the history of the body that was the founder of all
legislative traditions in South Africa.
Parliamentary history began in 1854 at, or shortly
after, the time when the wisdom of Lord Elgin and
of the Whig statesmen of Early Victorian days hit upon
the most successful experiment in the government
of dependencies, by entrusting to the people the
management of their own affairs, the disposal of their
own Crown lands and the responsibility for their owrn
financial vagaries.
In the Cape of Good Hope for the first period these
gifts were circumscribed by an Executive appointed
by and responsible to the mother country. This regime
lasted from 1854 to 1872. It was a period of profound
peace and of great educational value.
viii FOREWORD.
Speaking generally, the representative assembly was
hostile to, and jealous of, the appointed Executive. In
consequence there was a far more rigid scrutiny of
the finances and a greater reluctance to incur loans
than has been manifested under the boon of party
government, when power and place depend upon
placating the electorate. But whether this is post hoc
or prop/er hoc it is not for me to say.
In 1872 the full benefits of cabinet, with party,
government was granted. In judging of the results
three points may be noted : Great Britain was slowly
emerging from the cold fit, when eminent statesmen
could talk of '"those horrid colonies"; the era of
Lord Carnarvon's federation proposals which led up
to the annexation of the Transvaal ; the appointment
of Sir Bartle Frere — that unflinching advocate of a
forward policy both in territorial extension and in
native affairs — which paved the way not only for the
era of native wars which lasted till 1883, but for the
genesis of anti-British feeling of which perhaps the
end is not yet in sight. The cold fit in Great Britain
has been succeeded, with a brief interval of lower
temperature, during the term of office of Lord Derby,
to which we owe the presence of Germany on our
borders, by the flamboyant imperialism of Mr. Joseph
Chamberlain and the succession of dire events which
\vere moderated, but not terminated, by the odyssey
of that distinguished pilgrim to the illimitable veld.
FOREWORD. ix
In 1872, or thereabouts, the British moneylender
discovered the colonies and began to oblige them with
capital on easy terms, which created a more or less
fictitious prosperity and shed a lustre over the period,
while it has piled up burdens for which a grateful
posterity will no doubt rise up and call them blessed.
In 1872 the noble and distinguished order of St.
Michael and St. George burgeoned forth for the grati-
fication of colonial statesmen and those whom they
delight to honour, until the dominions are adorned
with a twinkling splendour and one star calleth
another to promote the true imperial feeling.
In all these movements the Cape Parliament has
borne a not undistinguished part, verifying the
predictions of that astute statesman, Lord Elgin.
Synchronising as it did with the discovery of the
Diamond Fields, the new Government in the Cape,
under the prudent guidance of Mr. Molteno, felt itself
justified in entering on a large project of railway
communication, which has been continued and expanded
until the line which in 1872 had its terminus at
Wellington, some fifty miles from Table Mountain,
has reached the Congo and ramified over the whole
sub-continent, making possible the vast expansion of
enterprise and trade which have made South Africa
the treasure house of the world. Some day tardy
justice will be done to the first Premier under responsible
government in South Africa, who, by the confidence
FOREWORD.
that he inspired, both in the commercial classes and
the conservative land-holders, enabled the first not
inconsiderable steps to be taken in railway construction,
and, by so doing, laid the substantial foundation of
the successful enterprise that adds so much to our
prosperity.
Possibly, however, the most distinguishing mark
of the Cape Parliament in its second period was the
appearance of Cecil Rhodes, and the opportunity that
it gave him for putting into practice that discovery of
the practical application of vast wealth to political ends,
which for good or evil is destined in the hands of
imitators to go far.
That great man always said that South Africa was
the most interesting part of the British Dominions, and
certainly he did his fair share in verifying the truth of
his obiter dictum.
On the whole the Cape Parliament did not play an
unworthy part. It was always decorous to the verge
of dulness, and if, in its inordinate love for legislation,
and its fondness for shuffling off awkward questions
to the interminable investigation of commissions, it
displayed a somewhat laissez alter indifference to its
duties as a check upon administration, in these respects
it was no worse than similar bodies elsewhere.
In the Cape, as in other Parliamentary countries,
the Caucus, the Machine, the Press and the Platform
came as rival forces, and, as their influence and power
FOREWORD. xi
waxed, those of Parliament waned. But it merged its
existence in that of the Union before the lamentable
example of the British Parliament had made it clear
that some radical change is wanted if Parliaments in
future are to retain their position in the minds and
hearts of free peoples.
If one had to choose an epitaph for the Cape Parlia-
ment now merged in the Union splendour, perhaps it
would not be inappropriate to write the hackneyed
lines —
" Beneath the good how far,
How far above the great."
R.I.P.
Introductory Note.
Old Cape House is not offered to the public as a
manual of procedure or as a political treatise. The desire of
the writer having been rather to interest than to inform, it has
been his endeavour to keep his reader and himself well in touch
with the customary atmosphere of the House, without losing
sight of its honourable traditions, or unnecessarily obtruding its
official and technical elements.
In the form of articles ^Uhe Old Cape House first appeared
m "TT/ie Cape ^,4rgus and "TT/ie Cape ^imes, and by the kind
permission of the Editors of those journals they are now re-
printed with some additions which seemed to be called for, as
well as with annexures containing facts and figures which may
be useful to readers who take more than a passing interest in
the Parliamentary history of this country.
Thanks are due to many friends, who have supplied inform-
ation and illustrations; to members of Parliament for their
encouragement — especially to the "Father of the House" who
writes the Foreword ; and to my father (who sat for thirty
years at the Table) for permission to make use of his note-
books and his Cape Cioil Service List.
R K
House of Assembly,
Cape Town
llth Mav, 1918.
Table of Contents.
PAGE
FOREWORD BY THE RT. HON. J. X. MERRIMAN, P.C., LL.D.,
M.L.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii
INTRODUCTORY NOTE xiii
THE STORY OF THE CAPE CONSTITUTION (1795-1872)
THE OLD CAPE HOUSE :
I. In the Goede Hoop Lodge 0 854- 1 884) .. 25
II. The Building of the " New " Houses of Parliament . . 53
III. In the "New" Houses of Parliament (1885-1910) .. 61
THE SPEAKERS OF THE CAPE HOUSE .-
I. The Hon. Sir Christoffel Brand, Kt., D.C.L., LL.D.
(1854-1874) 97
II. The Hon. Sir David Tennant, K.C.M.G. (1874-1896) 115
III. The Hon. Sir Henry Juta, Kt., K.C., B.A., LL.B.
(1896-1898) 131
IV. The Hon. Sir Wm. Bisset Berry, Kt., M.A., M.D., LL.D.,
(1898-1908) 145
V. The Hon. Sir James Molteno, Kt., K.C., B.A., LL.B.
(1908-1910) 159
ANNEXURES :
A. Executive Councillors, 1854-1872 .. ..169
B. Cape Ministries, 1872-1910 170
C. Members' Length of Service .. .. .. ..175
D. Additional Representation Acts .. .. .. ..176
E. Constitution Ordinance Amendment Acts, 1854-1910.. 177
F. Duration of Sessions and Payment of Members,
1854-1910 .. .. ' 181
G. Parliaments and Sessions. 1854-1910 182
INDEX 187
List of Illustrations.
RT. HON. J. X. MERRIMAN Frontispiece
FACING
PACE
LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL CHAMBER, 1834-1884 3
PLAN OF CAPE TOWN, 1833 4
OLD SUPREME COURT BUILDINGS, 1832 . . . . . . . . 6
HON. WM. PORTER 8
LETTERS PATENT, 1850 ..10
MR. JOHN FAIRBAIRN 12
S.S. "LADY JOCELYN " 16
GOVERNMENT HOUSE, 1832 18
HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY, 1854-1884 .... ..25
PLAN OF HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY, 1875 26
MR. SAUL SOLOMON 28
OPENING OF PARLIAMENT IN GRAHAMSTOWN 38
BUILDING OCCUPIED BY HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY IN GRAHAMSTOWN 40
PLAN OF BUILDING OCCUPIED BY HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY IN
GRAHAMSTOWN 42
HON. SIR JOHN MOLTENO 46
DESIGN FOR "NEW" HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT .. .. .. 53
THE "NEW" HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT, 1885-1910 .. .. 61
HON. SIR THOMAS UPINGTON . . . . . . . . . . 66
HON. J. H. HOFMEYR 68
RT. HON. SIR GORDON SPRIGG 70
RT. HON. C. J. RHODFS .. 72
COL. THE HON. F. SCHERMBRUCKER 80
DEBATING CHAMBER, HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY, 1910.. .. .. 90
HON. SIR CHRISTOFFEL BRAND 97
HON. SIR DAVID TENNANT 115
HON. SIR HENRY JUTA ..131
HON. SIR WM. BISSET BERRY .. .. ..145
HON. SIR JAMES MOLTENO ..159
THE SPEAKERS' CHAIRS 161
The Story of the Cape Constitution.
1795-1872.
THE LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL CHAMBER IN THE OLD
SUPREME COURT BUILDINGS.
The three upper window? facing into the courtyard belong to the
" Record Room in which the Legislative Councils held their meetings
from 1834 until the "New" Houses of Parliament were completed
in 188-4.
Spe
Gordon Pilkington
The Story of the Cape Constitution.
1795-1872.
SIR BENJAMIN D'URBAN, the new Governor,
had been expected at the Cape for some days.
On Thursday, the 16th of January, 1834, his
ship — a handsome teak-built sailing vessel of 611
tons burthen, with " elegant accommodation " for
passengers — was sighted, and Cape Town, ordinarily
so calm, was soon bustling with excitement. Rustling
skirts fluttered towards the jetty near the Castle,
while gentlemen, wearing swallow-tails of blue, buff
or brown, hurried to and fro in the shade of the
Heeregracht, or Adderley Street, as it is now called,
and by half-past one, when Sir Benjamin, his wife,
his daughter and his suite drove up to Government
House, troops had lined Grave Street and the Parade,
and guns were booming a salute from the Castle.
Having been sworn in by the Chief Justice, Sir
John Wylde, His Excellency was introduced to a large
number of those present and his commission was read
aloud. So far the proceedings had been more or less
of a social character, but in days gone by the
constitution was developed or confirmed by the instruc-
tions issued to the Governor, and with the reading
of the commission it was soon realised that the dawn
of a new era in the government of the Cape had begun.
THE CAPE CONSTITUTION.
Under the short period of British government from
1795 to 1803 the Governor alone had wielded all
executive and legislative power, and this system had
been restored in 1806 when Cape Town capitulated
to General Baird. For a time things had gone fairly
well and the inhabitants of the settlement had
made no effective protest until Lord Charles Somerset,
choleric and sometimes vindictive, had shown what
a headstrong Governor in a wayward mood could do.
Then, owing to the complaints of the British settlers,
a commission of enquiry had been sent to investigate
matters, and two years later (in 1825) a council of six
official members had been established to " advise and
assist in the administration of the Government."
Bureaucracy, however, had given little more satisfaction
than autocracy, and up to the time when Sir Benjamin's
commission was read three well-supported movements
had been made to obtain a form of government in
which the people themselves might share.
The commission, after appointing Sir Benjamin
Governor of the Cape and its dependencies, went on
to provide that the settlement was henceforth to be
administered by a Governor with a Legislative Council
as well as with an Executive Council. This, at all
events, was something achieved. The Legislative
Council was to consist of the Governor, the officer
next in command of the forces, the Secretary to the
Government, the Treasurer-General, the Auditor-
Explanation.
1. Colonial Office in which Coun- <
a! of Advjce me[ in 18Z5 Li.
? / eai<slxttvf> Cn/inr/I*. l#t\4-'R4'~t
cil ofAdv/ce met: in
egJJ/a tive Coun c//j,
old Sureme C.
(UIU o^ACOTC Ln DL UgJ )
3.<5i{e of Hs of A^tmbty \
((joede Hoop Lodge), Jffif -31 .+ iu
f Site of ~Ne.v Houses of ( 1 '_]"]
~PArhfimrnt IRR^- /Q//1 "• '
' '..^ | I .ef ^ jf |
| *-L*iX™°
Keizer*gra.chl \^r
rrr^rrrd^ F^
PLAN OF PART OF CAPE TOWN IN 1833
— showma; the sites of the various buildings occupied
SECRET SESSIONS. 5
General and the Attorney-General, together with not
fewer than five nor more than seven leading inhabi-
tants, to be selected by the Governor.
" All men will view this as an important boon,"
wrote John Fairbairn in the Commercial jtfdoertiser
two days later. ' It may not come up to, or it may
exceed, the expectations of some ; but we repeat that
it will yield satisfaction if for no other reason than it
furnishes a pleasing and unerring proof ....
that the barrier which has hitherto stood between us
and the exercise of the proudest privileges of British
subjects is soon to be thrown down and that the Eye
of the Community is about to be admitted into the
hitherto darkened chamber of Cape legislation."
The old " Council of Advice," appointed in 1825,
had totally excluded the " Eye of the Community."
None of its members were 'chosen to represent the
people, and, with closed doors, it had met in the old
" Colonial Office " buildings that used to stand in
the north-east corner of Government House gardens,
where, instructed by Lord Charles Somerset, it had
been sworn to the strictest secrecy. The House of
Commons itself had, and still has, semi-obsolete
orders* declaring it to be a gross breach of privilege
to publish anything occurring in the House ; but
' These orders are now acknowledged to apply only to mala fide reports
and although the public and the press may be excluded it was considered
necessary in 1916 to provide for the prohibition of reports of secret sessions by
means of an Order in Council under the Defence o' the Realm Act, 1914.
THE CAPE CONSTITUTION.
these orders were drafted in the dark days, when
conflicts between the Crown and the Commons often
resulted in the sudden death of a member, and the
idea then was to keep the proceedings from the ears
of the King.
In the new Legislative Council, of which certain
leading inhabitants were to form a part, the King's
representative (Sir Benjamin D'Urban) was himself
to preside, and it was hoped that the doors would be
thrown open to the public and the Press. But when
the Council first met on the 2nd of April, 1834, in
the Old Supreme Court Buildings (the Slave Lodge
of the Dutch East India Company !), its doors, too,
were closed, and nothing more than the colourless
' Votes and Proceedings " were made public. This,
it is true, was in accordance with the practice in New
South Wales and Van Diemen's Land, but it was a
severe blow to the progressive section of the community
of the Cape, and was the signal for a renewed effort
to obtain a thoroughly representative assembly.
A meeting of citizens was held in the Commercial
Hall (where the post office stands to-day) and at one
o'clock on the 22nd of October, 1834, three gentlemen
(Mr. Collison, Mr. Waters and Mr. Thompson)
knocked at the door of the Council Chamber and
craved admission in the name of the public. Within
the Chamber the question was keenly discussed, and
it was not until they had heard the clock in the public
EXTERIOR OF THE OLD SUPREME COURT BUILDING?
IN 1832, FROM THE FOOT OF GOVERNMENT AVENUE.
In these buildings (formerly the Slave lodge of the Dutch Fast
India Company) were the Supreme Court, the Government Offices
and the Legislative Council Chamber, 1834-53 and 1854-H4.
Pen-and-ink sketch from a litho«ra,,hed drawing l,\ H. C. dc Me, lion.
ADMITTANCE OF THE PREKH. 7
buildings strike four, that Mr. Colhson and the two
gentlemen who had accompanied him were informed
of the result. On the Governor's recommendation
new standing orders had been adopted, they were told,
and in future each member of the Council would
be entitled to admit one person to be present at its
meetings, and each newspaper could send one reporter
on the strict understanding that they were bound to
withdraw on a motion made to that effect by any
member.
Here was one grievance removed, and from that
time onwards a full account of the debates was published
in the Commercial Advertiser ; but at this time
the population consisted of about 115,000 persons,
excluding some 34,000 slaves, and many of the
colonists felt that on this score alone they were
entitled to a more representative form of government.
Appeals were again made to the British Government,
but there was always some " insuperable obstacle " ;
and, indeed, the colonists themselves were not united
on every point. Those of the Western Province wanted
the Colony undivided, but the majority of those in the
Eastern Province desired a separate administration.
At last, on the 2nd of November, 1846, Earl Grey,
Secretary for the Colonies, announced in an oft-quoted
despatch " that on a question of this nature some
difficulties may be wisely encountered and some apparent
risks well incurred in reliance on the resources which
THE CAPE CONSTITUTION.
every civilised society, especially every society of British
birth or origin, will always discover within themselves
for obviating the danger incident to measures resting
on any broad and solid principle of truth and justice."
This despatch was addressed to the Governor, Sir
Henry Pottinger, but nothing was done until Sir Harry
Smith succeeded him. Sir Harry had been given a
copy of the despatch before he left for the Cape, and
on his arrival took an early opportunity of personally
consulting Mr. Porter, the Attorney-General, as to the
precise form of representative government likely to
prove acceptable to the colonists.
In Mr. Porter the country was fortunate to have the
very man most fitted to give sound advice. In 1839 he
had been offered the post of Attorney-General at the
Cape, and, although only a young man practising at the
Irish Bar, his friends were not half sure that it would be
wise for him to accept the position, as it was felt that
his intellectual strength and rare gift of oratory would
win for him even greater promotion in his native
country. He accepted the appointment, however, and
in time took all the Cape could offer. So great was his
love of fairness and justice, his zeal and his capacity
for work, that at the Bar, in the Legislative Council, and
afterwards in the House of Assembly he would often
furnish the opposite side of a case rather than achieve an
unmerited success. Nothing seemed to overtax his brain
and no amount of detail clouded his power of lucid ex-
HON. WILLIAM PORTER, C.M.G. (i>. 1803. J. I8tt»
Attorney-General from 1839 to 1866 and member for Cape
Town from 1869 to 1873. He drafted the original
Constitution Ordinance as well as the " Responsible
Government Act.
From a portrait in the possession of Mi«s F. A. VV.itermeyci .
MR. PORTER.
position. He never expressed an opinion without having
made the fullest investigations and everything he under-
took he did thoroughly.
What Mr. Porter did was to draw up a memorandum
which formed the basis for all future discussion. It was
submitted to the Executive Council and three judges
in March, 1848, and four months later, in the form of
a draft constitution, was sent to England by Sir Harry
Smith, who just previously had admitted that " the
Legislative Council is regarded in this colony as a
failure."
It is impossible to say what course events would have
taken had it not been for the great anti-convict agitation
which shortly afterwards shook the Colony to its founda-
tions. On the one hand the Dutch and English were
thrown together in a common aversion to the landing
of criminals on their shores, but, on the other hand,
they incurred the displeasure of the Colonial Office in
England. The colonists, however, were encouraged by
success and, utilising the organisation which had been
perfected by John Fairbairn, the energetic secretary of
the Anti-Convict Association, they redoubled their
exertions until, on th<i 23rd of May, 1850, Letters Patent
were issued by the Queen in Council laying down the
main principles of a constitution on the lines of Mr.
Porter's draft and leaving the details to be filled in by
the Governor with the assistance of the Legislative
Council.
io THE CAPE CONSTITUTION.
The Council, however, barely existed at this time,
as five of the unofficial members had resigned on account
of the convict question and others had refused to be
nominated in their places. Dislike was openly shown
for the nominative system, and Sir Harry Smith conse-
quently took the wise course of asking all the divisional
road and municipal boards in the Colony to select
members for nomination. Christoffel Brand, Sir Andnes
Stockenstrom, Reitz and Fairbairn, who were returned
at the top of the poll, were then nominated and in
addition the Governor selected Mr. Godlonton from
further down the list.
An unusual amount of interest was shown when, on
the 6th of September, 1850, the new Council met.
Even before the doors were opened at one o'clock quite
a large number of citizens had gathered outside, and the
Chamber was soon crowded with strangers delighted
to see Stockenstrom and Reitz sitting on the left of the
Clerk and Fairbairn and Brand on his right. For a
short while the business was conducted smoothly, but a
section of the public soon began to get impatient with
the slow progress that was being made, and a fortnight
later Sir Andries Stockenstrom presented a petition
from 225 residents of Cape Town, praying the Council
to confine themselves to the framing of the constitution,
and Mr. Montagu, the Secretary to the Government,
having presented another petition to the opposite effect
the proceedings became decidedly animated. Both
LETTERS PATENT AUTHORISING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF A PARLIAMENT AT THE CAPE.
By this writ of Privy Seal, dated the 23rd May, 1850, it was ordained
that a Parliament should be constituted by an Ordinance to be passed
by the then existing Cape Legislative Council,
From the original document (measuring -'9 l-v 21 inches) in the Cape Archive
DRAMATIC RESIGNATIONS. u
parties had carefully prepared for the fray, and, after a
heated discussion, Sir Andries Stockenstrom produced
and dramatically held up a document containing eleven
" reasons for dissent." One after the other, the four
" popular " members, Stockenstrom, Brand, Fairbairn
and Reitz, identified themselves with it, appended their
signatures, tendered their resignations and made farewell
speeches, after which, we are told, the meeting broke
up with " tremendous cheering. "
The Council being again without a quorum, Sir
Harry Smith appointed the remaining members a
commission to consider the constitution. A week after-
wards they presented their report, and a few days
later it was forwarded to England.
But meanwhile the members who had resigned were
requested by the Municipalities of Cape Town and
Green Point to draw up a constitution according to their
own views. This resulted in the famous " Sixteen
Articles," and Mr. Fairbairn and Sir Andries Stocken-
strom were deputed to convey them to England.
Mr. Fairbairn had now reached the zenith of his
fame. He had arrived at the Cape at the age of twenty-
nine to take up a literary career with Thomas Prmgle,
the poet, and had been foremost in every movement for
the improvement of the country. " An accomplished
scholar, well versed both in ethical and physical science,"
as Pringle had said of him, sincere and persevering,
having at heart only the welfare, prosperity and
12 THE CAPE CONSTITUTION.
advancement of all classes," as he himself had said, he
had been instrumental in securing the freedom of the
Press, trials by jury, the construction of roads and
bridges, the development of education, and had largely
assisted in averting disaster when the Cape was
threatened with becoming a penal settlement. Regardless
of financial loss, he had for many years battled un-
flinchingly against overwhelming odds. He had made
many public enemies, especially in the Eastern Province,
but in private he never spoke ill of any man nor harboured
bitter feelings. His intention, as he had expressed it,
was to soothe the minds of the people, at that time
highly exasperated by the oppressions of the local
Government, and to convince them that institutions
similar to those of England would protect them against
the recurrence of the many evils they had endured.
In appearance he looked the ardent reformer he was.
His upper lip was firm and his thick hair was brushed
straight across a thoughtful brow, while his eyes, grey-
blue, deep-set and piercing, rather suggested the
" second sight " he was supposed to have.
This was the man in whose hands the greater portion
of the Cape unhesitatingly placed their hopes and
aspirations. Sir Andnes Stockenstrom was in bad
health and unable to proceed at once to England, but
Fairbairn was soon ready to make his departure, and
on the 26th of October, 1850, between two and three
thousand inhabitants assembled in and around the
MR. JOHN FAIR BAIRN: (;,.,•„ 1794. ,/i:-,/ !%4).
The Father of the South African Press " whose pertinacity
and unflinching zeal were important factor? in the struggle
for representative government. .Member of the Legislative
Council, 1850. and of the House of Assembly. 1854-1863.
From an autographed drawing in the City Hall, Cape Town.
MR. FAIRBAIRN'S MISSION. 13
Town House to bid him good-bye. A box was handed
to him containing the " Sixteen Articles," engrossed on
a scroll over eight feet long (now in possession of his
grandson), duly signed and sealed by the Commissioners
of the Municipality of the City of Cape Town, together
with supporting petitions and resolutions. Amidst
enthusiastic cheering he rose to reply in his broad
Scotch dialect to the speeches that had been made, and
when he had ended, says an eye-witness, he stood
silent for a moment, overcome with emotion. " Gentle-
men," he said, " for a short time I bid you — farewell.
God bless you." " God bless you," shouted the excited
multitude, and down to the wharf they trooped to
witness his embarkation. The Madagascar, the ship
he was to sail in, was swinging at anchor some little
way out, but nearly fifty sailing boats gaily decorated
provided an escort, and when the time came to bid a
final farewell a band played " Rule Britannia," the
little boats put back to land, and cheer after cheer was
raised until the blue-coated figure standing on the
quarter-deck grew dim in the distance.
The proceedings were almost unparalleled in the
Colony, and showed the intense interest in public affairs
lhat Fairbairn himself had awakened. But even among
the onlookers there were a few staunch Government
supporters who viewed the wooden casket containing
the " Sixteen Articles " as a kind of Pandora's box
filled with all manner of evil things, and on the other
14 THE CAPE CONSTITUTION.
side of the water his official reception was by no means
cordial. Public interest had not moved so fast as it had
at the Cape, and in the letters they wrote to the Cape
both Fairbairn and Stockenstrom sometimes expressed
high expectations but more often showed a deep des-
pondency. They saw and wrote to everyone who could
advance their cause, but in the middle of it all came a
Kafir war, and although interest in South African affairs
was quickened, the realisation of the colonists' dream
was deferred for a time. Among the useful things they
did in England was to give evidence before a Select
Committee of the House of Commons and, moreover, they
were able to get a legal opinion on a constitutional point
of considerable importance. The Governor, unable to
fill the vacancies in the Legislative Council occasioned
by the resignation of the four " popular " members,
had again found himself in a quandary, from which
Earl Grey had sought to extricate him by " additional
instructions " declaring the competency of the Legis-
lative Council to act with its reduced membership.
' Was this constitutional ? Would the acts of such a
Council be valid? " were questions Fairbairn and
Stockenstrom put to three eminent lawyers, Sir Fitzroy
Kelly, Spencer Walpole and J. R. Kenyon.
' We are of opinion," was the answer, " that the
instructions . . are . . . altogether invalid and void.
It is clearly established that by the law of England a
legislative constitution once granted by the Crown to
PROVOKING DELAYS. 15
a Colony is irrevocable, except by the authority of the
Imperial Parliament or by the act of the local legislature
with the consent of the Crown."
Sir John Russell disagreed with the opinion, but a
conflict was averted by the Governor being instructed
to fill the vacancies to the best of his ability and to
proceed with the draft Ordinance, which was returned
to the Cape in a more complete form.
On the 27th of November, 1851, Fairbairn and
Stockenstrom returned, and on the same day, by
a curious coincidence, the draft Ordinance and
the covering letter were published in the Government
Gazette. Again there were innumerable delays, due
this time to two official members of the Council, Mr.
Montagu (the Secretary to the Government) and Mr.
Rivers (the Treasurer-General), having changed their
minds as to the advisability of having a representative
assembly, but at last the draft was considered, passed
and sent to England for the last time.
Eagerly the expectant colonists awaited an Order
in Council ratifying the constitution, but the only news
they got was bad. It was rumoured that extensive
alterations were to be made and that by the time the
constitution was returned it would not be worth having.
Uncertainty gave rise to mistrust ; public meetings were
again started and the British Government was inundated
with petitions, addresses and resolutions.
A change in the Government brought relief, and.
16 THE CAPE CONSTITUTION.
with the Duke of Newcastle as Secretary for the
Colonies,* the fears of the colonists were set at rest.
The few alterations that were made were not very
important.
It only remains for me now," wrote Newcastle,
" to assure you that in transmitting to the Colony of the
Cape of Good Hope Ordinances which confer one of
the most liberal constitutions enjoyed by any of the
British possessions, Her Majesty's Government are
actuated by an earnest desire to lay the foundation of
institutions which may carry the blessings and privileges
as well as the wealth and power of the British nation
into South Africa ; and whilst appeasing the jealousies
of sometimes conflicting races, to promote the security
and prosperity, not only of those of British origin,
but of all the Queen's subjects so that they may combine
for the great common object — the peace and progress
of the Colony."
The ship that carried the constitution in its final
form was the Lady Jocelyn. She dropped anchor in
Table Bay as the sun rose on the 21st of April, 1853,
after a passage of thirty-seven days from Plymouth
and in herself showed the progress the world had made
Die delays which occurred when Earl Grey was Secretary for the Colonies
1846-52) gave rise to the following epigram quoted in the "Life of Sir C.
Napier " : —
This point was long disputed at the Cape,
What was the devil's colour and his shape?
The Hottentots, of course, declared him white,
1 he Englishmen declared him black as night ;
But now they split the difference and say.
Beyond all question that Old Nick is Grey.
THE MAIL STKAMF.R LADY /OCf-LY.\
— which earned the Constitution Ordinance in it?
final form to the Cape in 1853. The ship is
depicted in a hurricane in the Ray of Bengal ten
years later.
ARRIVAL OF THE CONSTITUTION. 17
since Sir Benjamin D'Urban had landed with the
commission containing the germs of a free constitution.
Square-rigged on all three masts, a sailing ship at first
glance, she was, according to the company's advertise-
ment, in reality "an iron ship of 1,800 tons propelled
by the screw," carrying sixty-seven passengers for the
Cape, Mauritius, Ceylon, Madras and Calcutta — a
veritable leviathan compared with the ships of 1834 !
A fine ship well suited to carry a fine constitution.
The constitution provided for a Parliament to consist
of the Governor, an elective Legislative Council of
fifteen members and an elective House of Assembly
of forty-six members, and took effect from the 1st of
July, 1853. The old Council held its last meeting on
the 14th of October, 1853. On the 16th of November
a proclamation was issued calling upon the registered
constituencies to elect members for the new Legislative
Council and on that date the old Council expired.
After the elections for the House of Assembly Cape
Town was the scene of general festivities. Balls, levees,
dinners and receptions were given, and members of the
new Parliament, including those from the Eastern
Province who had arrived by H.M.S. Dee, were feted
by all.
It had been intended to hold the opening ceremony
in the little room (afterwards known as the " Record
Room ") which had been occupied by the old Legislative
Council in the Supreme Court buildings, and was to be
iS Tllfi CAI>K CONSTITUTION.
the temporary Chamber of the new Council, but at the
last moment this plan was abandoned and it was decided
to use the State Room in Government House.
A throne was set at the south end of the room under
a rich canopy of scarlet cloth, the music gallery at the
opposite end was prepared for ladies, and various other
arrangements were completed only just in time. At
half-past ten on the morning of the 1st of July, 1854,
the gates leading into Government House gardens from
the Avenue were thrown open and a large crowd flocked
on to the lawn outside the State Chamber. A moment
or two later the steady tramp of soldiers was heard,
and with band playing and colours waving, in marched a
guard-of-honour from the 73rd Foot Regiment, halted,
formed up in a line alongside the stoep, and ordered
arms with a crash. Never before had there been such
a brilliant state function in the Cape. There were judges
in their crimson gowns ; bishop and clergy ; naval,
military and Indian officers ; the corps diplomatique,
and a Turk with a fez.
At a quarter to twelve the President and members of
the Legislative Council arrived and took their seats on
the right-hand side of the empty throne. Precisely at
twelve His Honour the Lieut. -Governor, Mr. (afterwards
Sir Charles) Darling, made his appearance ; a salute
of nineteen guns was fired from the Castle, the guard-
of-honour presented arms and the band struck up
God Save the Queen."
' •
• •••
GOVERNMENT HOUSE, CAPE TOWN. IN 1832
— showing the exterior of the State Chamber m which the
first Cape Parliament wa= opened in 1854.
From a lithographed drawing by H. C. de MeiMon.
A STEPPING STONE. ig
All being in readiness, the House of Assembly was
summoned from the Goede Hoop Lodge, was bowed
in by its newly elected Speaker and took its place on the
left of the throne. The opening speech was read and
the Parliament, so often within reach and so often
snatched away, was a real living institution.
But it would be a mistake to suppose that all the
colonists were content with what they had got. The
constitution was what is known as " representative,"
but the officers who comprised the Government were
debarred by the Constitution Ordinance from becoming
members of Parliament. Sitting and speaking in either
House solely by virtue of their permanent Downing
Street appointments they were independent of political
parties ; and requiring no parliamentary support they
could view an attack on their policy or administration
with composure. If Parliament differed from them it
could be dissolved, but they went on for ever. " Repre-
sentative " government was, in fact, only a stepping
stone from which the Colony might pass either forward
to full " responsible " government under which ministers,
by being made eligible for election to either House,
would be answerable to Parliament for their conduct,
or back again, as some colonies did, to " Crown Colonv"
government.
Discussions on the subject were raised in both
Houses almost at once and continued until Governor
Wodehouse, after making three reactionary attempts to
20
THE CAPE CONSTITUTION.
amend the constitution, brought matters to a head by
dissolving the House of Assembly in 1869 and submitting
to the electorate a draft Reform Bill under which it was
proposed to revert to a system not unlike the old by
reducing the two Houses of Parliament into one. This
Bill was introduced into the new House of Assembly
in 1870; but, much to the delight of the majority in
the House of Assembly, it was defeated by thirty-four
votes to twenty-six. The anti-reform party shook hands
all round, even the gallery cheered, and, according to
an imaginative reporter, " Mr. Ziervogel skipped down
Grave Street like a young lamb, and Mr. Solomon
popped into his carriage like an industrious flea."
Next year, Mr. (afterwards Sir John) Molteno
carried a motion in favour of " responsible " government,
and in the year following (1872), when a remarkably
short Act giving effect to the resolution was passed, he
was called upon to form a Cabinet under a constitution
that had taken nearly three-quarters of a century to
evolve.
The Old Cape House.
I.
In the
Goede Hoop
Lodge,
1854-1884
Che Banqueting Hall of the GOEDE HOOF LODGE
BUILDING OCCUPIED BY THE HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY,
1*54 1884.
^ith the exception of the session held in Grahamstown in 1864, this
hall was occupied until the "New" Houses of Parliament were
completed. It war situated at the top cf Grave (now Parliament)
Street, and was destroyed by fire on the 21st February. 1892. On its
site was built (lie present Good Hope Hall
! ii.iwn from a pliotoeraph in the possession of A Flliott.
I.
In the Goede Hoop Lodge,
1854—1884.
THERE is no getting away from the fact that the
building occupied by the Cape House of Assem-
bly during its first thirty years of existence was
far from what it should have been. Originally it had
been proposed that the Supreme Court should be
used by the House of Assembly until other arrangements
could be made, but the Banqueting Hall of the Goede
Hoop Lodge was used instead, and whatever attractions
the hall may have had by reason of its surroundings,
it was certainly more suitable for the entertainment
of convivial brethren of the Lodge than for the housing
of colonial statesmen. The gardens attached to it
were irreproachable. A fountain tinkled in the centre
all day long and spreading oaks tempered the heat
of summer. Nor was the exterior of the building
unattractive. Besides the mam entrance, it had two
pillared doorways leading into the garden, while its
dull green slate roof harmonised with the foliage.
Lack of accommodation was its chief sin. The
whole building, offices included, was not much bigger
than the dining-room of the Union Houses of Parliament,
2(> /AT THE (iOKDK HOOP LODGE.
while the Debating Chamber measured only twenty
feet across. It is true that there were only forty-six
members in 1854, but, divided into two rows on each
side of the House, there remained an aisle of barely
four feet between the two front benches !
Yet, even in its cramped surroundings, the House
had a dignified appearance. It is unlikely that the most
critical member of the Mother of Parliaments would
have found anything to smile at, and, notwithstanding
the disheartening sentiments of the London Times,
it required only a few sessions to show that, in its
composition, the Cape House would bear comparison
with any in the world. On its eighteen inch flooring
boards scenes were enacted, oratory displayed and
statesmanship revealed of which any Parliament might
be proud.
In 1854 the public gained admittance through
the main entrance facing down Grave Street, and,
after passing into a narrow passage, visitors were
ushered into what was called the " public gallery "
—a few seats arranged in rows and separated from
the ' House " by a rail of rough unpamted pine
and a green baize curtain. At two o'clock a great
hand-bell was rung, and when prayers* had been
On the 4th of July, 1854, the fourth sitting clay ol the first session, Dr.
Abercrombie called attention to the fact that so far no prayers had been read, and
the House unanimously resolved "That the business of this House be commenced
iy prayer to Almighty God." The prayer used by the old Legislative Council
Irom 1834 to I8';>3 was then adopted with slight modifications, and was substan-
tially the saint' r.s that now used by the Union House of Assembly.
UJ
Q
CC
<
o
Q.
O
O
X
UJ
Q
UJ
O
a
MEMBERS
ENTRANCE
PL\N OF THE BUILDING OCCUPIED BY THE HOUSE OF
ASSEMBLY, 1854 '84.
The drawing is dated 1875, and shows the arrangements as finally
adopted. The " member's entrance" shown here was originally used
a public entrance, and th
om a plan in the I'nlon Ho
Speaker's Cha
of As
OFFICERS OF THK J/OUNK.
read the curtain was drawn aside and the House,
its members, its officers, and the Press gallery were
exposed to view.
At the upper end of the hall facing the sea sat
the stern-visaged Speaker (Sir Christoffel Brand) on
an old-fashioned Dutch chair mounted on a small
platform about two feet high. Immediately below
him were the Clerk and the Clerk-Assistant seated
at a deal table covered with green baize (even then the
predominating colour), and piled high with books.
The bearded Clerk, Mr. H. J. P. le Sueur, was the
nephew of the then Postmaster-General, and the
Clerk-Assistant, Mr. C. J. Brand, Jun., was a son
of the Speaker. Close to the bar of the House, Major
Longmore, the Sergeant-at-Arms, had a raised seat
from which he would constantly descend to announce
in a loud voice " a Messenger from His Excellency
the Governor," or " Messengers from the Honourable
the Legislative Council."
These were the officials of the House, but just
behind and to either side of the Speaker's Chair,
half-hidden by a screen, were the representatives
of the Press : William Buchanan and his son James
(afterwards a Judge of the High Court of Griqualand
West) representing the Commercial jldoertiser and
ZKCail on the one side, and R. W. Murray, Sen. ("Lim-
ner "), representing the ^Conitor on the other.
The Commercial Advertiser and <J$£ail printed by
JN THE GOEDE HOOP LODGE.
far the better reports of what took place, but Murray's
pen was never still, and it is largely due to his sketches
of members and reminiscences of early Cape days
that it has been possible to reconstruct the House
as it was. It should be remarked, however, that
he was by no means impartial. A close examination
of the articles he wrote, and the periods at which
he wrote them, unfortunately exposes a strong political
and even personal bias. One of his duties as editor
of the -JXConitor was to oppose Fairbairn, and Fairbairn,
according to the ^Tom/or, never uttered a wise word
in the House. Speaker Brand he soon fell foul of,
and henceforth Brand was transformed from an able,
impartial, fearless Speaker to a doddering old red-faced
man whom " it was high time should be pensioned."
Saul Solomon, whom he lauded to the skies in 1854,
was ten years later, when Murray edited an Eastern
paper, nothing less than narrow-minded, ungenerous
and spiteful !
But to return to the House as visitors saw it in 1854.
On the front benches on the Speaker's right sat the four
executive officers, W. Hope (Auditor-General), H.
Rivers (Treasurer-General), W. Porter (Attorney-General)
and Rawson W. Rawson (Colonial Secretary), followed
by Fairbairn, Watermeyer, Ziervogel, Molteno, Memtjes
and Laws. On the left front benches were, to mention
only a few, Arderne, Fairbridge, Tancred, Wiggins
and White, while in a back bench behind Wiggins
MR. SAUL SOLOMON: (b»™ 1817. ./.v.f 1892)
A dwarf in stature and a giant in intellect. He is seen in his
back bench seat in the Goede Hoop Lodge. He represented
Cape Town from 1854 to 1868 and from 1870 to 1883
From a portrait by
Parliament
\V> H Schroder, 1883 in the Union House
PROMINENT MEMBERS. 29
sat Saul Solomon, the brainiest man in the House.
Advocate J. H. Brand, another of the Speaker's sons,
who in 1863 became President of the Orange Free
State, was absent on circuit during the early part
of the session, but he took his seat in time to show
his abilities in discussions on some of the most important
matters of the session. Could anyone wish to see
a collection more brilliant than this in a colony which
at that time could boast of not more than 140,000
white inhabitants ?
The Legislative Council consisted of only fifteen
members. Presided over by the Chief Justice, Sir
John Wylde, they sat round a horse-shoe shaped table
(recently broken up) in the upper room in the Old
Supreme Court Buildings that formerly had been
used by the Council of 1834-'53. There seems to have
been a plentiful supply of green baize in those days,
for this table, too, was covered with that material.
Numerically, the Council was thus far weaker
than the Assembly, but among its members were such
sterling men as H. E. Rutherford, F. W. Reitz, J. B.
Ebden and J. de Wet for the West, and Sir Andries
Stockenstrom, R. Godlonton, G. Wood and H.
Blame for the East ; and that they appreciated their
functions and valued their opinions as much as did
the House of Assembly is seen from the innumerable
disagreements between the two Houses.
Troubles over money bills began in the first
30 IX THE GOEDE HOOP LODGE.
session and ended rather curiously. The Constitution
Ordinance expressly permitted the Council to amend
Bills appropriating money for the service of the Crown
or imposing taxation, and no sooner had the House
of Assembly sent the first Appropriation Bill to the
Council for concurrence than that august body became
inordinately inquisitive. It wanted to know why the
Speaker's salary was fixed at £800, why the Governor
did not want more money for Road Boards, and several
other things besides. Conferences were held between
the two Houses, and eventually the Council decided
to give the Governor money for Road Board officials
whether he wanted it or not.
The Assembly was up in arms. The Council amend
a money bill ? Never ! According to the letter of
the law it certainly had the right to do so, but what
of that ? The time-honoured constitutional practice
of the Imperial Parliament was good enough for them,
and so they rejected the amendment. The Council
insisted on the amendment, but instead of being content
with saying so, they decided to inform the House
of Assembly that ' the Bill is consequently lost."
The bearers of the message were duly announced,
walked up the floor of the House, and were on the point
of handing it to the Speaker, when that astute custodian
of the Assembly's privileges spied the accompanying
The message he would receive, but not the Bill,
lor, said he, if the Bill were lost in the Council the
DISPUTES WITH THE COUNCIL. 31
bearers of the message could not possibly have it in
their possession. But the bearers seemed to think
it had been found again. They persisted in handing
over the Bill and firmly placed it on the Speaker's
desk. The Speaker just as firmly picked it up and
dropped it on the floor, and there it expired — the
first Appropriation Bill and the first bill to " drop "
in every sense of the term.
The Governor was thus left without funds, but
he soon found a way out of the difficulty by embodying
such of his requirements as were non-contentious in
a supplementary Appropriation Bill. This Bill was
passed by both Houses, and at the prorogation ceremony
His Excellency took the opportunity of asking them
to think over their troubles more calmly during the
recess. But from that day to this the two Houses
have continued to wrangle, and R. W. Murray tells
us that when a few years later they attended the cere-
mony connected with the laying of the foundation
stone of the patent slip at Simonstown, they were
so much at loggerheads that the band struck up, " Oh,
dear, what can the matter be? " much to the amusement
of Sir George Grey and the guests.
Messages between the Upper and Lower Houses,
by the way, were at first conveyed by two members
specially deputed on each occasion, and one can under-
stand the feeling that prompted the House of Assembly
to abandon this practice after a three years' trial
32 IN THE GOEDE HOOP LODGE.
It was then (1857) proposed that one of the officers
of the House should be empowered to carry messages
to the Council, but no one appears to have been par-
ticularly anxious constantly to tramp Grave Street
and climb the twisting staircase to the Council room.
When the Clerk of the House was suggested he looked
down his nose, and when the Clerk- Assistant was
mentioned he looked out of the window to see what
the weather was like. The Clerk of the Papers had
his turn, but when the qualifications of the doorkeeper
had been discussed the doubtful honour was thrust
upon the chief officer as the most suitable to be trusted
with the dignity of the House.
The distance which separated the Colonial Lords
from the Commons was, however, even greater than
that which separated their Imperial prototypes from
one another in the days of old when the Commons
resorted to the Chapter House in Westminster Abbey
and left the Lords in possession of the Parliament
buildings over the way, and the result was that the
Clerk of the House had often to dash to and fro more
like a professional sprinter than a sedate official. Under
these circumstances it is not difficult to understand
how it came about that before the two Houses were
brought under one roof the Clerk-Assistant was also
deemed to be a person worthy of the dignity of carrying
messages.
No legislative body could have been more jealous
INTEMPERANCE. 33
of its dignity, but the most austere assembly in the
world is subject to the frailties of the flesh. It is said,
for instance, that in the English House of Commons,
at the end of the seventeenth century, it was not
thought peculiar for a party of Cabinet Ministers,
stripped to their shirts and riotously intoxicated,
to climb the nearest signpost in order to drink the
King's health from a suitable point of vantage. Al-
though the Cape House never got quite so far as that,
there is one notorious instance of intemperance. A
member (who shall be nameless), after giving cause
for comment during the whole afternoon of the 9th
of June, 1857, reached an unmistakable stage after
dinner. He wanted pen and ink and paper, and
insisted that the Clerk of the House should supply
him from the drawer in the Clerk's desk. As the
drawer was locked, the key was angrily demanded,
and it looked as though an unseemly altercation was
about to take place, until Mr. Molteno made a timely
interference and asked the House, through the Speaker,
to order the withdrawal of the member.
The House was more than willing, but the member
demurred. Then a bright idea struck him. Why
should he be bullied ? Why had the House suddenly
decided to get rid of him ? He appealed for protection
and peace, as well as for pen and ink. ' Ve-ry well,"
he said, when this was refused. ' I will seek my
own protection, Mr. Speaker [he pronounced it
J4 fX THE (10KDE HOOP LODGE.
' Shpeaker '] . I have allowed this to go on too long !
Am I to give up an opinion — when I have a self-con-
viction ? For what reason is all this brought forward ? "
" Be at peace," interjected Mr. Fairbairn. ' Take
the advice of friends and quit the Chamber."
' Well, well," continued the fuddled member,
there is my hand and my word of honour. If you
are satisfied I am for peace, I will sit down."
' Will you withdraw P " asked the Speaker."
"NO," came the stentorian reply ; " I throw myself
on the hands of gentlemen." The question was put
that the offender be placed in the custody of the Ser-
geant-at-Arms, and was carried by acclamation. The
Sergeant-at-Arms approached his prisoner, and for
a moment they looked at one another. Then, turning
about, the Sergeant-at-Arms headed for the exit,
followed by the delinquent, who, with one eye cocked
on the shining mace, strutted out, singing " Rich
and rare were the Gems she wore."
I know of only one other instance of a member
being placed in custody. ' While Mr. Shepperson
was addressing the House," read the Journals dated
the 22nd of May, 1856, "Dr. Tancred repeatedly
interrupted the proceedings." Mr. Speaker called
him to order, but Dr. Tancred not only persisted
in ' vexatiously interrupting the House," but refused
to leave the Debating Chamber until conducted out by
the Sergeant-at-Arms.
DR. TANCREISS PECCADILLOES. 35
Left alone, the House quickly resolved that Tancred
" had made himself guilty of contempt of this House,
and that he, therefore, be committed to the custody
of the Sergeant-at-Arms until he shall have satisfied
the House." Tancred was brought to the bar, informed
of the decision, and again removed in charge. He
appears, however, to have been an unwilling guest,
for no sooner was his fate determined than he seized
a sheet of foolscap and hastily scrawled in letters an
inch big : " Dr. Tancred for Clanwilliam, seeing that
the Chair and Speaker must be upheld, gives his un-
conditional apology to the Speaker and this Honourable
House." But this Honourable House was in no hurry
to see Dr. Tancred for Clanwilliam, and by postponing
the consideration of his belated retraction; allowed
him to remain in the company of the Sergeant-at-Arms
for five days.
One of the first things the House had done on
its meeting in 1854 was to appoint a Select Committee,
comprising Porter, Fairbairn, Fairbridge, Watermeyer,
and Ziervogel, to frame Standing Rules and Orders.
These were drafted with the greatest care, and, with
only a few alterations, were adopted by the House
in the same session. They numbered only 173, and
by enunciating sound principles without entering into
many details, remained in use, with a few additions,
for twenty-nine years.
Dr. Tancred was the first to test them, and this
36 IN THE GOEDE HOOP LODGE.
is the most charitable light in which that insufferable,
thick-skinned nuisance may be remembered. At first
he shocked the House, then by turns he angered and
amused it, until finally Speaker and members decided
to disregard his antics. One day he would mimic
a member, another day he would defy the authority
of the Chair, but on the 24th of April, 1856, he exceeded
all Parliamentary bounds.
The House was in committee on the report of a
Select Committee, when Dr. Tancred, who favoured
the separation of East from West, interrupted Mr.
Ziervogel by shouting out, " Separate, separate,"
to which Mr. Ziervogel retorted with some warmth :
' Perhaps the House would be glad to separate from
Clanwilliam and its honourable member too — and the
sooner the better." The afterthought was the
finishing touch.
' What's that you say ? " roared Tancred, red-hot
with rage. " One member is as good as another."
' Yes," replied Ziervogel, " and perhaps a little
better."
This was too much for Tancred. Inarticulate,
he sprang from his seat, threw his pocket-handkerchief
in Ziervogel's face, and significantly walked outside.
Ziervogel was sensible enough not to follow him.
Nothing, he assured the outraged House, that was
done by Dr. Tancred could offend him. When the
committee had reported, and the insult was brought
A FRIVOLOUS AMENDMENT. 37
to the Speaker's notice, Tancred was summoned
to his seat and, after he had offered a very poor apology
to the House, it was deemed expedient to let the matter
drop.
Failing separation from the Western Province
the Easterns naturally urged that Parliament should
sometimes hold its meetings in their part of thecountry.
The Governor was empowered by the Constitution
Ordinance to summon Parliament to meet anywhere
in the Colony, but notwithstanding growls from the
East, Parliament was only once summoned to meet
outside Cape Town. In 1855 an Eastern moved
' That the just claims of the Eastern Province require
that the next session of Parliament be held in some
suitable town in the Eastern Province . . . but
there were many obstacles, such as the transference
of the Parliamentary records, and Dr. Tancred, in a
facetious mood, moved as an amendment, in words
curiously resembling those of the original motion,
that the Governor be requested to instruct the Colonial
Secretary (Rawson W. Rawson) to carry the Cape
Archives on his back to the town selected, and further,
to instruct a medical officer ' to attend the Colonial
Secretary and support him in his bodily and mental
exertions." The amendment, needless to say, was
not seconded, and the original motion was negatived.
But in 1863 a similar motion was carried, and,
although it was defeated in the Council, the Governor
38 L\ THE GOKDE HOOP LODGE.
decided, owing to his inability to pass certain measures
in Cape Town, to hold the next session in Grahamstown.
At the prorogation ceremony he announced his intention.
The Western members were thunderstruck and strongly
protested, but their protestations were in vain, and
held in Grahamstown the next session was.
The Sergeant-at-Arms lugubriously packed up the
mace* and, pestered by reporters, curious to see his
precious charge, travelled by sea and land to the City
of Saints. The Speaker drove overland, and found
the jolting he got on the journey extremely disagreeable.
Grahamstown, on the other hand, was delighted,
and the hotel proprietors beamed at the prospect of
unusual profits.
As the buildings in the Drostdy grounds had just
been vacated by the garrison, the old military hospital
(now used as a botany room by the Rhodes University
College) was prepared for the House of Assembly,
and three wooden Crimea-huts (subsequently destroyed
by fire), which stood close by, were allotted to the
Legislative Council. The services of a local carpenter
were requisitioned to make the interior of these buildings
resemble the two Houses in the Cape, and, so successful
were his efforts, that before Parliament met, the Cape
I In* mace is now used in the Union House of Assembly, and is a replica of
that which Kas been in use in the House of Commons since the Restoration. Cost-
ing 100 enini-as, it was ordered from England in 1854, and arrived the following
year in a French-polished oak case. In 1892 a new case was made from the wood
" \ an Riebeek's Thorne," a mimosa tree some 320 years old which was blov>-n
down ui^t outside the Houses of Parliament in that vear.
OPENING OF PARLIAMENT IN THE SHAW COLLEGE.
GRAHAMSTOWN, 1864.
The troops are seen presenting arms as the Governor s carnage draws
up at the entrance to the building in High Street. The building is
now used for various purposes, and the facade has been entirely rebuilt.
Fiom a wet plate negative in the possession of A. Flliott
THE ORAHAMSTOWN SESSION. 39
Town House of Assembly and the one in Grahamstown
were, in the words of a man who knew both places,
" as like as two peas." There were the same four
rows of seats covered with sham morocco, the same
square table with mahogany brackets for the mace,
and the same desks, screens and glass ink-stands.
Amid great rejoicings of the inhabitants, the opening
ceremony took place in the Shaw College in High
Street on the 28th of April, 1864. Members of Par-
liament foregathered in houses just opposite the college,
and the Westerns noted with amusement the " Separ-
ationist " inscriptions on some of the streamers that
adorned the street. " Look out for squalls," read
one ; " Shall you remain ? " bluntly queried another ;
and " Shall we keep company ? " was the strange
device of a third. When the ceremony was over members
of both Houses returned to their respective buildings,
and West prepared to tackle East in its own stronghold.
During the session a peculiar informality was
disclosed which resulted in a notice being served on
the Speaker by a firm of Cape Town attorneys.
Preceding the session, there had been a general election,
and the Constitution Ordinance provided that when
all the results had been proclaimed in the Qazettz
the Governor might summon Parliament by procla-
mation. Now not only was this proclamation issued
a few hours before the publication of the Clanwilliam
election results, but it was known that on the date
40 IN THE GOEDE HOOP LODGE.
on which the proclamation purported to be signed in
Cape Town the Governor was actually in the Eastern
Province and that he, therefore, could not possibly
have affixed his name to the proclamation as by law
required.
The two members for Clanwilham (Mr. Boyes and
Mr. Steele) expressed themselves highly aggrieved.
They drew up a " solemn declaration and protest,"
and through their attorneys called upon Sir Christoffel
Brand, the Speaker, to show cause why the proclamation
summoning Parliament to meet, as well as the whole
proceedings at Grahamstown, should not be declared
" null and void, illegal and of no effect."
The document was considered by a Select Committee
which reported to the House, and the House, to the
credit of the Western members, told the Speaker not
to take any notice of it.
After sitting for three months in Grahamstown,
both Houses met once more in the Shaw College —
this time for the prorogation ceremony — and heard
that the Governor regarded the session as a success.
The Westerns, however, took a different view, and those
who still remained lost no time in getting back to theii
homes.
The next session (1865) was the longest in the history
of the Cape Parliament, and one of the liveliest that
took place in the Goede Hoop Lodge. By an Act
of its own the Imperial Parliament attempted to force
BUILDING OCCUPIED BY THE HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY IN
GRAHAMSTOWN IN 1864.
View of the old military hospital in the Drostdy grounds. The
members' entrance to the debating chamber has Keen converted into
the window shown on the extreme right. The steps which led to the
entrance have been removed, and the trees hav bet n lately cut t.own
From a recent photograph i-v Lt.-Col. H. Greener.
OBSTRUCTION. 41
the Cape Legislature to annex British Kaffraria, and
Saul Solomon promptly moved a resolution that
took three pages of printed foolscap, roundly denouncing
the Imperial Parliament for " violating our Constitu-
tional rights " by attempting to force the hand of
the Cape Parliament and censuring the Governor for
carrying out his instructions. At a quarter to one on
a chill morning of the 24th of May — the Queen's
Birthday of all days — the motion was agreed to without
a division, and, having thus disposed of the Imperial
Parliament, and the Governor, Westerns and Easterns
joined issue on the additional number of seats to be
allocated upon the annexation of Kaffraria.
Parnell had not yet shown how to employ " the
sacred right of obstruction," but the Easterns managed
fairly well for themselves. They read pages and pages
from blue-books, quoted extensively from Webster's
Dictionary, and, not unnaturally, showed a predilection
for excerpts from ,/J T^ow at the Oxford ^/Jrms. The
Westerns put in an appearance as little as possible,
and the Easterns took advantage of the fact by arranging
with three or four members to read extracts to empty
benches, and at regular intervals to draw attention
to the want of a quorum (twelve members). The
bell would then be rung as in a division, and the Westerns
would be obliged to muster in sufficient force to form
a quorum and so prevent the count-out which would
have meant that the Bill before the House would
42 IX THE (iOEDE HOOP LODGE.
lapse and have to be revived by a fresh motion involving
fresh discussion. On one day alone there were fifty-
eight counts, and, before the Bill was passed, there
were over four hundred, five of which did result in
the House being counted out.
The Bill had hardly been read a third time when
both parties put their quarrel on one side in order to
honour a man to whom honour was due. William
Porter was about to retire from the office of Attorney-
General and the House unanimously decided to pass
a vote of thanks for the exceptional services he had
rendered. During his term of office he had done as
much as any to create the proper tone in the House
and to mould its character. He had prepared, and
written in his own hand, almost every bill introduced,
and was admired as much for his oratory and brain-
power as for his downright honesty, his regard for
the feelings of others, his manliness and his modesty.
He was now sixty years of age, and grey-bearded,
but his tall figure was as erect as ever, and when he
strode into the House just before the Orders of the
Day were read on the 21st of August, 1865, there
was an expectant silence. A few days before, when
a vote of thanks had been passed, it had been resolved
that the Speaker should communicate the resolution
to Mr. Porter in the House, and the galleries were
crowded in anticipation of the event. Members and
the public rose as he entered, and when Mr. Speaker
a QD oaa°°°
a an p GOOD
MEMBERS f@) 5PEAKE.K'i
ENTRANCE ^ ENTRANCE
PLAN OF THE BUILDING OCCUPIED BY THE HOUSE OF
ASSEMBLY IN GRAHAMSTOWN, 1864.
Slight structural alterations have «mce been made.
MR. PORTER'S FAREWELL. 43
after an appropriate address handed to him a scroll
on which was engrossed as many words of heartfelt
thanks as could be worked into formal phraseology,
Mr. Porter held an admiring audience spellbound
by a speech that was as eloquent as it was humble.
And when he finished speaking there was a spontaneous
burst of cheering, in which the strangers in the gallery
lustily joined, despite the remonstrances of the Sergeant-
at-Arms.
Mr. Porter, even when a member of a conservative
Executive, had been in favour of party government,
and sitting as a private member for Cape Town in
1872 he had the satisfaction of seeing the " Responsible
Government Bill," which he had been called upon
to draft, pass through the Assembly after a hard fight
and scrape through the Council by the casting vote
of the Chairman of Committees.
In this year (1872) the House consisted of sixty-six
instead of the original forty-six members, and of these
only five who had sat in the first House remained to
hand on its traditions. They were Molteno, Porter,
Solomon, Ziervogel, and the Speaker, Sir Christoffel
Brand. But there had been added at least five new
members of note to transmit the unwritten laws to
the younger generation, namely, J. X. Merriman,
T. C. Scanlen, G. Sprigg, Tennant (afterwards Speaker)
and J. H. de Vilhers (afterwards Lord de Villiers),
and with such members to show the way the House
44 IN THE GOEDE HOOP LODGE.
entered into a period of transformation that lasted
until the old buildings were forsaken. The introduction
of responsible government meant an organic change,
but it was not revolutionary, and the process of develop-
ment was far slower than might be expected. Many
responsibilities properly attaching to the Government
but filched by a House envious of executive control
continued to be undertaken by the House ; the old
rules still obtained, and Ministers were at first prone
to forget that they depended on the good-will of Parlia-
ment for their existence.
In 1874, however, when Sir DavidTennant was elected
Speaker, the character of the House, from the arrange-
ment of the Debating Chamber to the form of its
proceedings, underwent a noticeable change. Like all
new brooms he made a clean sweep. The Speaker's
Chair, which, in 1866, had been moved from the upper
end of the Chamber to a position facing across the
floor, was placed at the lower end of the Chamber,
a proper Press gallery was built, and the attendants
were smartened up with new uniforms.
Sir David had read the signs of the times aright.
He recognised the spirit of evolution that was at work,
and, as Speaker, took far more upon his shoulders
than had his predecessor, who, in accordance with
ancient custom, had regarded himself merely as the
mouthpiece of the House, and had frequently referred
back to the House, or the Select Committee on Standing
CHAIRMEN OF COMMITTEE*. 45
Rules and Orders, questions that he had been asked
to decide. In some cases Sir David followed this
practice, but with the accumulated precedents that
had been established and a good conception of the
sense of the House, he generally stated exactly what
should or should not be done. He discountenanced
frivolous motions of the Tancred type, and drafted
revised rules.
Simultaneously the status of the Chairman of
Committees was greatly improved. Hitherto each
Committee of the Whole House had chosen its own
Chairman, and sometimes as many as twenty members
were selected during one session. Some were good
but others were indifferent, and even bad, and as
none had the advantage of continuous experience, a
feeling had been growing that only one member should
be elected for all Committees. Among the most success-
ful Chairmen had been Mr. W. Walter, and on him,
in 1875, was conferred the distinction of being appointed
first permanent Chairman of Committees of the Cape
House. Elected for George in 1859, firm, upright
and impartial, he was much respected by both sides
of the House, and invested the new office with the
authority to which it was entitled.
In 1872 a blow was struck at the old party divisions
of East and West by passing an Act establishing seven
circles instead of the Eastern and Western Provinces
for the Council elections. In 1882, at the instance ol
46 L\ THE (iOKDE HOOP LODGE.
J. H. Hofmeyr, an Act was passed (without a division
in the House of Assembly) permitting the use of the
Dutch language in debates. In 1883 both Houses
surrendered to the Supreme Court their exclusive
right of determining the validity of elections, and
in the same year passed the Powers and Privileges
of Parliament Act, which at last enabled them to
stretch an arm beyond their walls and put an end to
insults which they had previously allowed to pass
unnoticed.
These were some of the more important changes
that took place during the period 1872-1884, but
there were many others. Although replies to the
Governor's opening speech had long been discarded,
the opening ceremony was as much as ever a public
entertainment, but from 1881 the grand finale, the
prorogation ceremony in Government House, was
discontinued, and only revived on three later occasions.
In 1882 the Governor virtually abandoned the practice
of sending messages to the House by one of his household
staff and communicated with the House through
his Ministers. In every direction there was a tightening
up of procedure and economising of time. The leisurely
old days when it took five hours to print a page of
foolscap, when the House adjourned for a Government
House ball, and when a member sought to postpone
a discussion because the Speaker had influenza, were
fast disappearing.
HON. SIR JOHN MOLTENO. K.C M.G. (b. 1814. ,/. 1886).
Sir John, or "The Lion of Beaufort" as he was called, headed
the movement for Responsible Government, and was the first
Prime Minister. He represented Beaufort West from 1854 to
1878 and Victoria West from 1880 to 1883.
From n rlrawimj by W. H. Schroder in " Hct Volksblad," 1884.
THE F1RNT PRIME MINISTER. 47
Meanwhile three Ministries rose and fell. When
the new constitution came into force on the 29th of
November, 1872, the Governor asked Mr. (afterwards
Sir Richard) Southey to form a Ministry. On his
declining, Mr. Porter, who had drafted the Bill, was
approached, but he, too, refused, as also did Mr.
Solomon, and so it came about that " Molteno,
the lion of Beaufort, the alpha and omega of every
question, the great Sir Oracle of the Assembly," formed
the first Ministry.
Of his trials and tribulations the reader will get
a full account in The Life and Times of Sir John
Charles Molteno, which gives * a minute description
of the trouble beginning with a native squabble at
a drunken feast, centreing round the resultant Kafir
war that set all the frontier ablaze, and ending with
the dismissal of the Molteno Ministry on one of the
biggest constitutional issues the Colony ever knew.
The crisis arose in connection with the use of Imperial
troops and the control of Colonial forces, but of the
forces themselves there could be nothing but praise,
and the House showed its feeling in a manner even
more elaborate than when it paid its tribute to Mr.
Porter. Sprigg, who, without a general election,
had formed a new Ministry, moved, and Molteno,
who now sat on the Opposition benches, seconded,
a resolution that a vote of thanks be accorded the
successful commanders. Political differences were laid
48 IX THE GOEDE HOOP LODGE.
aside, the resolution was agreed to, and on the 3rd of
July, 1878, the heroes of the hour, General Thesiger
and Commodore Sullivan, appeared in person to receive
the gracious thanks of the House through Mr. Speaker
Tennant. The whole House was specially prepared
for the occasion. Outside the building the Cape Town
Artillery had drawn up their guns, while inside tables
and blue-books had been removed, and two crimson
easy chairs placed within the bar. As the Speaker's
gallery behind the bar was apportioned to the blue
and scarlet-coated officers, distinguished strangers were
placed on either side of the Speaker's Chair.
At two o'clock Sir David Tennant, robed in state
gown of black and gold, took the Chair, and having
read prayers, invited the General and the Commodore,
who waited without the bar, to take their seats on
the floor of the House. The Sergeant-at-Arms bearing
the mace took up his position on the General's right
and the Speaker proceeded in appropriate terms to
convey to the Imperial and Colonial forces the highest
compliment Parliament can offer. Two soldierly
replies, and the hall emptied. The Artillery fired a
salute that shivered a pane of glass, and the proceedings
were at an end.
Thereafter the Opposition settled down in earnest
to oust the Government. Sprigg fell to Scanlen, and
just before Scanlen succumbed to Upmgton the House
moved over to the buildings now occupied by the
THE LODGE VACATED. ^
Union Parliament. No guns proclaimed the event.
The change from old quarters to new marked the
end of a distinct period in the development of the
Cape House; but when, during the recess of 1884,
Messrs. Bull and Son, the contractors for the new
buildings, had handed over the keys of the new
quarters, the Speaker and his staff moved silently
down Grave Street without ostentation of any kind.
For a short time the Native Affairs Department
made use of the old Lodge, but in 1892 it was destroyed
by fire, and after being rebuilt was used for almost
every purpose under the sun. To-day, however,
as the office of the Cape Town branch of the Government
Printing and Stationery Department, it is once more
the home of blue-books — blue-books that contain the
history of every question that exercised the ingenuity
of our early legislators. Buried away, they are the
dead bones of the past, but the spirits of their authors
still meet one at every turn.
II.
The
Building
of the
"New"
Houses of
Parliament.
ORIGINAL DESIGN FOR THE HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT
— By Charles Freeman, as modified and approved by a special
commission in 1874. The corner-stone war laid in the following year,
but the building was never completed.
t-raph on invitation lards issued for the ropvr- stone
II.
The Building of the "New" Houses
of Parliament.
A CHAPTER OF ACCIDENTS.
DO you think that the public and strangers can
have any respect for the Parliament of this
country when they see the members of the
two houses in the two different places* which they
now occupy ? "
The question was put by a member of a Select Com-
mittee of the " Upper House " to Major Longmore in
1859.
Major Longmore must have smiled. He was Sergeant-
at-Arms of the " Lower House," but he was also a poet
and a philosopher. " As to gaining more respect,"
he answered, " their acts will be the source of respect
shown to them."
The Select Committee, however, was sensitive
about visitors commenting on the " pig-sty places in
which discussions were held," and seriously contem-
templated appropriating the Public Library buildings,
then being erected, for the Houses of Parliament.
* Hie Record Room of I lie Old Supreme Court Buddings and the Goede Ho^p
I .odge.
54 KRKCTION OF NEW BUILDINGS.
Mr. Scott Tucker, the. Civil Engineer, urged the
committee to construct new quarters on the site that
was eventually adopted, but the Parade, Caledon Square,
Greenmarket Square, the Paddock half-way up Govern-
ment Avenue, and a space at the top of the Avenue were
also mooted, and had their supporters.
Captain George Pilkington, R.E., the first Colonial
Engineer, had previously submitted a design for the
buildings, but in the end the Committee decided that
Mr. Scott Tucker should draft fresh plans, and that the
site should be determined later. By " later " the Com-
mittee meant " soon," but it was not until the 23rd of
September, 1874, that the present position was finally
settled upon by a Commission.
Meanwhile Scott Tucker's plans met the same fate
as Pilkington's. They were laid aside, and in 1873 three
prizes were offered for the best designs for the new
Houses of Parliament. Seven were received, and the
Commission that selected the site decided that the first
prize of two hundred and fifty guineas should be awarded
to Mr. Charles Freeman, an officer in the Public Works
Department.
When Mr. Freeman's design, " Spes Bona," after
some modification, was officially adopted, he must have
counted himself a lucky man, yet in only a few months
he was, for a time, to rue the day he ever set pencil to
paper in the competition.
Great preparations were made for the 12th of May,
AN IMPRESSIVE CEREMONY. 55
1875, the day on which the foundation-stone was to be
laid. Miniature photographs of the new buildings (see
illustration) were pasted on elaborate invitation cards,
the day was proclaimed a public holiday, and crowds
gathered from far and wide to witness the event.
Bunting, flags, sunshine and colour made the proper
background, and in the foreground stood a tripod from
which hung the foundation-stone, a massive block of
granite engraved in letters of gold, " A.D. 1875." Near
the stone sat His Excellency the Governor, Sir Henry
Barkly, and when all was ready and speeches had been
made the real ceremony began.
In a cavity of the stone were placed a glass tube
containing specimens of the coins of the realm, together
with a parchment scroll, engrossed with the names of
eminent persons present, at the foot of which was the
name of Mr. Charles Freeman, architect.
Corn, wine and oil were poured on the stone by three
Masters of Masonic Lodges, and thereafter the Dean
prayed that " God Almighty might grant that the
building thus begun in His name might be happily
carried on to its complete termination without injury or
accident, and that when completed it might be used for
the good of this Colony, to the honour of our Queen and
to the happiness and good government of our people."
A silk flag bearing the newly designed Cape Arms*
* The Cape Arms were not formally granted by the Queen until 29th May, 1876.
For Royal Warrant see Cape Gazette, 1st Sept., 1876.
50 ERECTION OF SEW BUILDINGS.
was hoisted over the stone, but the building thus begun
was never completed, and the corner-stone itself has
vanished.
Mr. Freeman was appointed Resident Architect to
supervise the work and the unexpected happened. The
foundations had to be sunk deeper than had been
anticipated, water had to be drained off, and the probable
expenditure was found to be far greater than had been
estimated.
In submitting his design, Freeman had roughly
calculated that the cost of building would not exceed
£50,000 (the maximum fixed by the terms of the compe-
tition), and the Public Works Department had checked
his figures. But now it was found that with the modifi-
cations that had been made the cost would be quite
double that amount.
Someone had to suffer, and Freeman suffered acutely
—for a time. It was pointedly remarked that his designs
were very similar to a building in Illinois, and that they
had many points in common with Scott Tucker's.
Mr. Freeman was openly accused of neglecting his
duty by concealing information as to the increased cost,
and ten months after the foundation-stone had been
laid he was dismissed from office.
Then followed a period of doubt and uncertainty.
The House of Assembly decided to appropriate the
Commercial Exchange, which stood on the Parade. A
Bill was introduced for this purpose, but the Council
THE MISSING CORNER-STONE.
threw it out. During the suspense the foundations
which had been laid were found to be faulty, and at last
Mr. Greaves, of the Public Works Department, who
had been brought out from England in connection with
the building that had been started, was entrusted with
the preparation of entirely new designs.
In rebuilding the foundations, the corner-stone which
had been so reverently laid was surreptitiously removed,
and left to lie neglected among the refuse that surrounds
all new buildings. The coins and parchment scroll,
however, were rescued, soldered up in a tin box, and
quietly placed in a secret place made for it in the pro-
jecting foundations of the entrance to the Parliamentary
Library.
Even after the fresh start had been made there was
much wavering. Those who were to inhabit the buildings
became uneasy lest red-brick would have a meretricious
appearance, and wondered whether there were not too
many ornamentations.
Were the outlines all that might be desired, was
Doric the most suitable style after all, and would it not
be better to face the building with granite ? were questions
that assailed their doubting minds. More resolutions,
more correspondence, and another Select Committee,
and it was resolved that the building should proceed
as Mr. Greaves had planned it.
And so at last in 1884, after thirty years of uncer-
tainty, the Houses of Parliament were finished at a cost
58 ERECTION OF NEW BUILDINGS.
of £220,000. There was no dome, there were no statues
on the parapets, and there were no fountains as originally
provided by Mr. Freeman, but then his design would
have exceeded the £50,000 limit prescribed by the
competition !
How Mr. Freeman must have chuckled afterwards.
As a builder and designer he started business on his
own, and before he died, a few years ago, could point
in Cape Town alone to the Wesleyan Church, the
Standard Bank, and a host of other buildings, including
his own premises in Strand Street, as monuments to his
success and architectural ability.
HI.
In the
"New"
Houses of
Parliament,
1885-1910.
THE 'NEW HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT, I8S5 1910.
^ith the addition of a new wing on the further side, these
buildings arc now used Ky the Union Parliament.
From a phonograph hy K. Peters (" Hood's Studio "), Cape Tow,,
III.
In the i4New" Houses of Parliament,
1885-1910.
FROM the raised throne in the Legislative Council
Chamber of the " new " Houses of Parliament
His Excellency the Governor, Sir Hercules Robin-
son (afterwards Lord Rosmead) bowed twice. ' Mr.
President and Gentlemen of the Legislative Council,"
said he, and there was a ring of satisfaction in his voice,
" Mr. Speaker and Gentlemen of the House of Assembly,
in meeting you for the first time in this Chamber, I
desire to offer you my congratulations on being able to
assemble in a building worthy of the Legislature of the
Colony, and to express a hope that the erection of this
handsome and convenient structure indicates an in-
tention on your part to proceed in the future in that
course of progressive and useful legislation which has
been pursued in the past."
Outside the " handsome and convenient structure "
horse and foot regiments made as brave a show as wet
great-coats and a raw and gusty day in the month of
May, 1885, would allow, but within the building there
was seldom a more spectacular opening ceremony.
JN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
Hitherto these ceremonies had been held at Government
House whither both Houses of Parliament had proceeded,
but now that Parliament was properly housed the
position was reversed. Now the Governor, amid all the
pageantry befitting the occasion, could come to Parliament,
and men and women tricked themselves to show their
appreciation of the removal of the legislature from barn
to palace. Sir Thomas Scanlen wore the star of the
K.C.M.G., the Speaker's train was carried by his little
grandson attired in Highland costume, the Clerk and
Clerk-Assistant for the first time donned bob-tail wigs
and wore uniforms beneath their gowns, while the
judges looked as grave as when twelve years later they,
with General Goodenough, were themselves commis-
sioned to open Parliament during the absence of the
Governor.
" Palatial," ' magnificent," and even " stunning "
were words one might have heard as, the ceremony over,
members of the House of Assembly wended their way
back to their own side of the building. But the smell
of fresh paint and varnish in ornate surroundings did
not appeal to them all, and there were some faces,
tanned with the fresh air of the veld, that during both
the opening ceremony and the brilliant reception given
by President and Speaker the same night, betrayed the
sadness that comes in parting with an old home, be it
even a barn. In the Goede Hoop Lodge the garden
had been the lobby, and intercourse was governed by
DIVISION LOBBIED. 63
the freedom that the garden inspires. Now pillars of
marble with Corinthian capitals, tesselated floors, and a
Debating Chamber only a few feet smaller than that of
the House of Commons gave rise to a new feeling of
formality. The draughts were abominable, the light
was trying, the acoustic properties bad, and poor Mr.
Greaves, of the Public Works Department, was kept
busy for many a year later trying to remedy the defects.
There was only a small refreshment room, but a handsome
library and a comfortable billiard room made up for a
good deal. And then there were the division lobbies.
Now thereby hangs a tale, for the history of divisions
in the Cape House is peculiar. For the first five years
of its existence the Cape House thought it necessary to
preclude strangers from witnessing it divide, and when
a division was called the Speaker ordered the Sergeant-
at-Arms to clear the gallery ; but in 1859 democracy
gained a point and strangers were allowed the privilege
of hearing Mr. Speaker direct the Ayes to take their
seats on the right of the Chair and the Noes on the left.
In 1866, however, when the Speaker's Chair from facing
down the length of the hall was moved so as to face
across the floor, it had a long bench opposite it, and
only an imaginary line divided the right of the House
from the left. The Standing Rules and Orders Com-
mittee, fearing complications — a member might easily
have been cut in twain — recommended that the Speaker's
library and the Clerk's offices should be used as lobbies;
64 IX THE NEW BUILDINGS.
but although the report was adopted and the arrangement
of the House was not altered for some time, there is good
reason for believing that lobbies after being given one
trial were never again used in the Goede Hoop Lodge.
And so it came to pass that when members saw
lobbies with tellers' boxes opening into the Debating
Chamber in the new building they looked askance at
one another. The rules sanctioned this method of
dividing, but members did not like it. It was hinted
that stock farmers objected to being counted in the
same way as their sheep ; but, be this as it may, the
new lobbies were only twice used, and the doors leading
into them from the House were shortly afterwards
covered with oak panelling.
Whatever doubts there may have been as to the
quality of the buildings, there were none as to the
excellence of the members, except in respect of the
growing number of lawyers — a section of the House
that probably sacrificed more than any other in ac-
cepting election. It has ever been the lawyers' lot to be
misunderstood in Parliament. In the reign of Edward
III. "gentlemen of the long robe" were actually
excluded from the House of Commons, and when
they were admitted Pitt spoke of them as " the bloated
spiders of Westminster Hall ! " The old objection
was that these gentlemen were inclined to pursue
their own interests rather than those of the State,
but the more modern view probably arose out of the
LAWYERS. 65
difficulty some lawyers found in distinguishing matters
of public policy from matters of law.
In the Cape House it was much the same, and
in 1886 we find Sir James Rose Innes, then a brilliant
" legal ' member, and now Chief Justice, complaining
that the Colonial Secretary ' talked like a lawyer."
For his own part he vowed that he sloughed off his
lawyer's skin before he left his chambers, and consigned
his legal precedents and methods to his wig-box before
he turned his face towards the Houses of Parliament.
The lawyer, he contended, who did not pro hoc vice
cease to be a lawyer could not aspire to statesmanship.
Lawyers, moreover, would naturally excel in
laying down the law," and nobody dislikes being
lectured more than a member of Parliament. Perhaps
it was this feeling that stifled the picturesque practice of
hearing counsel at the bar of the House in opposition
to private bills. Four times the House suffered itself
to be thus lectured. The Sergeant-at-Arms carried
the mace beyond the bar, Mr. Speaker put on his
three-cornered black hat, and counsel, wigged and
gowned, held forth with invariable eloquence and
skill. But as a rule members slipped out one by one
to the tea room, and left poor counsel labouring away at
empty benches. Only once did pleading at the bar
produce a tangible result, and as the successful barrister
was Mr. Advocate Rose Innes, his obiter dictum on
the subject of lawyers in Parliament has added weight.
66 7j\- THE NEW BUILDINGS.
It is hard to say whether lawyer or layman was
the Demosthenes of the House. Opinions on the subject
vary, and as the standard of eloquence changed
considerably during the existence of the Cape Parliament
it is difficult to make comparisons. Porter and
Upmgton, for instance, were products of different
days, and consequently differed vastly in their style ;
yet who shall say that the one was greater than the
other ? In Porter's day an audience asked first that
its ear should be pleased and then its mind ; it adored
an apt quotation and revelled in a drawn-out
peroration full of flights and flourishes. Upmgton,
on the other hand, lived at a time when appeal to
reason was beginning to be the first requisite, and
men, intolerant of affectation, took fright at flamboyant
effects. Short speeches, rich in figurative language
and historical allusion, delivered earnestly in a musical
voice, however, were always the most impressive.
Such were Mr. Merriman's speeches, of which his
oration on women's suffrage in 1907 was a good
example.
But if any attempt were made to catalogue all the
speakers of the Cape House, Sir Gordon Spngg's
rhetoric, Saul Solomon's logic, Sauer's searing
criticism, Sir Thomas Fuller's and Sir Bisset Berry's
diction, and Sir Thomas Smartt's fluency would have
to be mentioned, and still the list would be far — very
far — from exhaustive, for, according to a magnanimous
HON. SIR THOMAS UPINGTON, K.C.M.G., Q.C. <••.. IN-I. rf. 1898)
Mr. Porter, Mr. Mcrnman and Sir Thomas ranked as the three
greatest orators in the House. With only a short interval, whilst a
judge he sat continuously from 1878 until his death. He served in
four Ministries and was once Premier.
From a drawing hv \V. H Schroder in " Het VolU.iati." 1835
ORATORS.
assertion by Judge Cole, " we are all fluent speakers
in this country."
As a matter of fact, however, some of the greatest
statesmen the Cape produced were not great speakers.
Rhodes' speeches were not polished, and J. H. Hofmeyr,
the Maker of Ministries — who, by his skilful leadership
of the Afrikander Bond, changed the whole political
complexion of the House after the general election
of 1884 — in spite of his careful choice of words, was
always, in Mr. Sauer's words, " the most misunderstood
public man in South Africa."
The truth is, of course, that the greatest thinkers
are not always the greatest speakers. The man of
few ideas who persistently hammers away at a subject
from one angle will often make a better impression
than the man with a flood of ideas who attacks the
subject from every point of view.
And then there were the members who hardly
spoke at all. Since the word " Parliament " is derived
from the French " to talk " Parliamentary government
is of course synonymous with government by discussion,
and from the earliest days there were members who
could talk for hours on end. T. H. Bowker in 1861
spoke on the Separation Bill for an hour on a Saturday
night and took breath as Sunday drew near, only to
continue from 2 p.m. until 7.20 p.m. on the following
Monday. Utterly exhausted, he ended by saying
that he would rather die on the floor of the House
68 IN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
than surrender his cause, but there were many who
realised that even in Parliament silence is sometimes
golden. Who in recent times will forget the self-
enforced silence of Dr. Jameson during the whole
of the 1900 session ? Or the effect produced by certain
members who spoke only when their acknowledged
grasp of a subject warranted the attention of the
entire House ? Some were silent because they preferred
to listen and to think, and others because they realised
that debating m Parliament, where most are practised
speakers, is a very different matter from speaking on
a public platform.
One member in particular was so nervous that
he is said never to have produced a single speech,
although he made copious notes for several, and was
a member for twenty years. Once he certainly rose
and caught the Speaker's eye, but before the Speaker
could call upon him he gasped, snatched up his notes
and left the House ! Better such a fate, nevertheless,
than that of the " woodcutter " member, who spoke
on woodcutters only and at all times, no matter what
was under discussion ; his grief was so painfully
apparent when it was made clear by Speaker or
Chairman that woodcutting was not a universal topic
or a central problem around which higher politics
revolved, and his foible was so easily the sport of
those jesters with which the high court of Parliament
always abounds.
HON. JAN HENDRIK HOFMEYR (6..,,, 1845. dM iw>
" On/e Jan,' by his leadership of the Bond, chanced the whole political
complexion of the House after the general election of 1883. Me was a
member from 1879 to 1895. and Minister without Portfolio in 1881.
From a hitherto unpublished drawing l,y I. M. Solomon.
CAP AND BELLti. 69
To be a Merry Andrew was, indeed, the secret
ambition of many a member, and after Dr. Tancred
died in 1866 there were several who sought and wore
the cap and bells. Colonel Schermbrucker was a
Bavarian by birth, had fought in the trenches of
Sebastopol, was large of build, wise, and, when the
House entered the new buildings, held Cabinet rank,
but when freed from the responsibilities of office,
he tried on the cap, and found it fitted. His wit was
not nimble. His success in his new role lay rather
in drollery and ponderous loquacity, which, combined
with his knowledge of the rules of debate, made him
at once a prince of obstructionists, the torment of
Speakers and the idol of the gallery. With an eye on
the gallery and his hand on his heart he vowed that
he was the ardent admirer and champion of the fair
sex, and in the same breath demanded that there was
only one right for women : the right to contribute
to the comfort of man. At a moment's notice he
would gladly undertake to hold up the House for an
afternoon. He angrily hurled back the ' base
insinuation that he was a fool and jester " and airily
told a Minister to " shut up " —yet when he died of
dropsy in 1904 he left no enemies. Would that all
jesters might have that epitaph.
These were a few individual types that went to
make up the House of Assembly, but it is not to
individuals that we refer in speaking of " the House."
THE NEW BUILDINGS.
' The House " had an individuality of its own, and
required no legal fiction to prove it a distinct entity.
Out of the clash of political ideals, personal ambitions,
and points of view there had early been evolved a
collective personality that was a being apart from
members, yet comprised them all, and reacted upon
their personalities. ' The House smiled " does not
necessarily mean that every member smiled, any
more than the familiar phrase, " This House is of
opinion " means that every member is of the stated
opinion. This probably applies to most representative
assemblies, but it was particularly true of the Cape
House.
That it was an essentially human " House " was
apparent to all who saw it under varying conditions,
and one illustration will be enough to show its depth
of feeling. In 1898 the death of Sir Gordon Sprigg's
old friend, Sir Thomas Upington, was announced.
The Premier, Mr. W. P. Schreiner, in moving a motion
of condolence, made a fitting speech, and Mr. Merriman
paid an eloquent and generous tribute to his old
opponent ; but it was Sir Gordon who accidentally
showed the real feeling of the House. He, a champion
who was accustomed to take as many hard knocks
as he gave, who had been dubbed " the Apostle of
Vigour," rose slowly to his feet. " Mr. Speaker," he
began, in an uncertain voice, and again, " Mr. Speaker,
I beg — to second — the motion." He got no further.
%
RT. HON. SIR GORDON SPR1GG, P.C., G.C.M.G. (b. mo, ./. 1<>13).
" The Apostle of Vigour," who was for 36 years a member of the
House. He served in s
Minister.
From a portrait bv u.. Rowortli
.Ministries, and was four times Prime
tl-c L'
THE FEELINd OF THE HOUSE. 71
For a moment he stood, and then, overcome with
emotion, sank back into his seat. Eyes sought the
pattern of the carpet, and to many the highly polished
desk- tops seemed blurred. A hoarse sob broke the
absolute stillness, and once more there was silence,
until Major Tamplin rose to the occasion and spoke
manfully " on behalf of the Bar." Sir Gordon was
not given to joking ; but the next day he joked, and
the House laughed — a laugh that was sadder to hear
than the gayest air played by a band after military
funeral.
Nor does the illustration end here, for when, ten
years later, after being absent from the House for
several years, Sir Gordon, bent with age, reappeared
and made a speech that betrayed only too plainly how
weak his mind had grown, the House cheered
encouragingly, and Mr. Sauer voiced the pleasure
with which it had listened. And when still later Sir
Gordon passed away, those who had been with him
in the days of his strength overlooked the shortcomings
time had produced, and remembered only the strong
man, who, through Gurney's reporting staff, had
fought his way from a shipbuilder's yard until he
himself, covered with honours, had four times steered
the Ship of State.
Complaints were sometimes made that the House
had grown stiff and formal since it had occupied the
new buildings, but as a matter of fact, it was always
72 IN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
homely in regard to its own affairs. Only in such a
House would the Speaker have continued to read
from the Chair letters inviting members to luncheons,
dinners, dances, sea-trips, and similar frivolities, and
only such a House would have paid the attention it
did to these matters. As late as 1897 we find that it
so enjoyed a short voyage on the flagship at Simon's
Bay that it actually passed a vote of thanks to Rear-
Admiral Sir Harry Rawson for his invitation and
courtesy. And so pleased was Sir Harry with the
coveted distinction that during the next session he
invited the House to another trip, and added a luncheon
and an exhibition of torpedo and gun -firing. The
House promptly accepted the invitation, and adjourned
for the whole sitting day !
In matters sartorial the House was even less formal
than it had been in the Goede Hoop Lodge. R. W.
Murray tells us that Rawson W. Rawson, Colonial
Secretary during the first Cape Parliament, for several
sessions attended the House in his official dress of
blue and silver, with glittering buttons, silver-lace
cuffs, and silver-lace collar, and for many years it was
the fashion for members to wear their best-go-to-
meetings as an outward and visible sign of respectability.
But at about the time the House changed its quarters
it also changed its tailor, Mr. Rhodes remarking that
he believed he could legislate as well in a suit of
Oxford tweeds as in anything else. The change was
RT. HON. C J. RHODES. P.C.. D.C.L. (/, 1855 ./. 1902)
Mr. Rhodes was twice Premier and represented Barkly \Xest from
1880 until his death.
'Dreamer devout, by vision led
Beyond our guess or reach,
The travail of his spirit bred
Cities- in place of speech."
—Kiblin*.
LOUD LAUGHTER:' 73
not instantaneous, and during the ninth Parliament
(1894-1898) a large number of members were still
to be seen wearing their silk hats while sitting in the
House, but frock coats were gradually put away by
members for opening ceremonies and by the Treasurer
for budget-speech day, until, by and by, there came
a time when it was not considered a breach of etiquette
for legislators to discard their waistcoats on a hot
summer's day.
Were further proof required of this having been a
human House, one had only to hear it laugh. It
laughed heartily, although there was really nothing
much to laugh at, and incidentally supported the
theory that the mainsprings of laughter are incongruity
and surprise. When Mr. Rose Innes, one of its most
esteemed and learned members, unconsciously placed
on his head a silk hat to which a gigantic official
envelope adhered, the House shouted with laughter ;
whenever the electric light failed at night the House
tittered at the expense of the member speaking in the
dark, and the member himself would stop, giggle,
begin again, and sit down amidst " loud laughter " ;
and when Sir Pieter Faure suggested that certain
members would benefit their health by a trip to Robben
Island, the veracious reporter once more recorded, in
parenthesis, " loud laughter."
But by far the greatest characteristics of the House
were its decorum and constant endeavour to act up
74 IX THE XEW BUILDINGS.
to its title of " honourable." If ever the House
responded as one man, it was on this question. Loose
charges of corruption were strongly deprecated, and
he was a brave man or a fool who would lightly impute
improper motives to the Cape Legislature. In 1888 a
hue and cry was raised over a newspaper article which
appeared to reflect on the integrity of members of
a Select Committee, and the House as with one voice
denounced the imputation ; while in 1898, when a
young and inexperienced member in a rash moment
charged another member with improperly influencing
a Select Committee, the House was so disgusted with
the flimsy grounds for his accusation that it ordered
the entries in the Journals to be expunged.
An important ruling showing how closely the
House guarded its honour was given four years later.
The conduct of certain members of Parliament had
been impugned on account of alleged irregularities of
the political party (the Afrikander Bond) to which
they belonged. As was usual in such circumstances,
members of the party at once pressed for an enquiry
to clear their honour, and on a question being raised
as to the competency of the House to deal with a
matter which might be contested in a court of law,
Mr. Speaker Berry ruled that where the honour of
members of the House was at stake the House reserved
to itself the right to deal fully with the question.
It might be expected from these precedents that
'HONOURABLE MEMBERS:' 75
the House would be so anxious to place the purity of
its proceedings beyond suspicion that it would welcome
an Act that would remove a possibility of a member's
honour being impugned. On the contrary, it seems
that a number of members resented the very suggestion
that there could be such a possibility, and when a bill
was introduced in 1897 to debar members from being
Government contractors, one member stated ' that
such legislation was uncalled for, and was an undue
reflection upon the integrity of members of Parliament,
and also upon the people who sent them there.
Members were altogether above any suspicion of
corruption." Although passed by the Council, it was
found impossible to push the bill through the House
of Assembly, and in the matter of contracts our
legislators consequently remain freer to this day than
members at Westminster.
Had these been all its characteristics the Cape
House might have been one of those visionary assemblies
of which a harassed Speaker might dream during the
recess. But being a human House and no vision, it
had its faults like ordinary mortals. Let it be admitted
at once that with age it became quick-tempered.
It was always the custom, as Sir Edgar Walton
once remarked, " for both sides of the House to extend
the utmost courtesy to new members," and chivalrously
to refrain from taking an unfair advantage of those
who could not be present to defend themselves, but
76 IN THE NEW BUILDINGS^
m times of suppressed excitement an aggravating
laugh, a supercilious smile, a jibe, or a saucy retort,
and swords, had they been allowed in the Chamber,
would have leapt from their scabbards. This is no
exaggeration, and accounts for the practice which
prevented Mr. Rothman from entering the House
with an umbrella, and Sir Thomas Upington with a
stick, to lean their frail bodies upon, without having
first obtained leave.
As it was, blood was only spilled upon the
floor of the House by accident. In 1892 Colonel
Schermbrucker, after remarking in the course of a
speech that ' there seemed to be a certain spirit
aroused which made the most ordinary action a matter
of the deepest pain," suited the action to the word by
knocking a glass of water over the leader of the Oppo-
sition and badly cutting his own hand. Schermbrucker,
being a gallant soldier, continued his speech with an
angry exclamation and undimmished gesticulations,
and it was only at the Speaker's urgent request that
he suffered his bleeding hand to be bandaged.
Deeds of violence, such as a disgraceful bout of
fisticuffs that once took place in the passage of the
Goede Hoop Lodge, were fortunately almost unheard
of, but words of heat were common enough.
Now the somewhat bewildering rules of procedure
are, after all, simple in their aim, for, while protecting
the minority against the majority, they have for the
IMPROPER BEHAVIOUR, 77
most part the same objects as the rules which individuals
consciously or subconsciously observe in coming to
a fixed resolve without undue haste, and in speaking
and behaving with propriety.
The unwritten rules of good behaviour were simply
the code of gentlemen, but some of those which
appeared among the Standing Orders are worth
examining. First of all, by a rule adopted in 1854,
the House attempted to discourage improper language
by placing the offender in a Parliamentary pillory and
exposing him to public obloquy. " All imputations
of improper motives," read the rule, " shall be con-
sidered as highly disorderly ; and such conduct shall
be minuted in the Journals if it shall appear to
a majority of the House to be necessary."
This rule continued in force until 1883, when the
mere minuting of improper behaviour was deemed
inadequate, and was superseded by a House of
Commons rule that had been designed in the good
old days to prevent duelling by demanding what
amounted to an immediate public apology from the
delinquent. Duelling, however, had grown out of
date when the rule was adopted in the Cape. Members
rarely carried their quarrels outside the Debating
Chamber itself ; besides which, " sending a challenge
to fight to a member " became an offence punishable
by fine and fee under the Powers and Privileges of
Parliament Act of 1883.
78 IN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
What was wanted was a quick method of preventing
scenes and checking words of heat as they arose. The
House of Commons rule which had been adopted was,
however, cumbersome and circumscribed. Objection
had to be taken immediately the offensive words were
used — not an instant later — and, on motion made,
the Speaker or Chairman, if he thought the occasion
warranted it, ordered the Clerk to take down the
words, and the Speaker ordered their withdrawal if he
considered them unparliamentary. Debate was not
only allowed as to whether the words should be taken
down but, after this had been agreed to, further
discussion was allowed as to whether the words taken
down were those actually used, and in the Cape it
happened once at least that members' memories were
so at variance that no decision was arrived at, and a
great deal of time was wasted in angry argument.
The rule has now become a dead letter in the
House of Commons, and was form all v applied on
only five occasions m the Cape, but from these it
will be seen how exacting the House always was.
On the first occasion (1886) Mr. Merriman objected
to the imputation contained in the statement that he
was expected to " reply to the specific charges made
.... as to what became of the ten thousand
pounds given by a certain company to secure the
passing of a certain bill."
In 1888 Sir Thomas Upington, Attorney-General,
WORDS OF HEAT. 79
objected to the statement " that he held a brief for
the other side."
In 1890 Sir Thomas Upington, again, objected to
the statement " that he would vote against anything,
even if originally introduced by himself, in case it were
supported by Mr. Sauer," then Colonial Secretary.
In 1899 Mr. Sampson objected to it being said
" that he made a false statement in the House, being
in the employ of De Beers' Company."
And in 1902 Mr. Merriman objected to the
accusation "' that he did not condemn men in the
Intelligence Department of the enemy with whom he
was cheek by jowl, day by day, in Cape Town."
On each of these occasions the words were with-
drawn after more or less commotion ; but after 1902
the Speaker, when appealed to at the proper time
found it far more efficacious to demand a withdrawal
less formally. Sometimes he would invite ar expression
of regret in the guise of a personal explanation and
sometimes when not appealed to he even found it
advisable to be a little deaf. Did he hear Sir James
Sivewnght declare that he was sick of a certain
member's drivel ? Did he hear a certain member,
after being continually interrupted on points of order,
exclaim to his tormentor, " Oh, sit down, you damn
fool " ? Or did he hear Colonel Schermbrucker say
to a Minister, " If there is any fool in the House, it
is you " ? The records are silent.
So IN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
During the period of stress and storm from 1899
to 1902, when shots echoed across the veld, many
epithets were exchanged in wordy warfare that it
would have been futile to try to check ; but this
much was ever clear, that the Speaker was constantly
on the alert to protect a member's personal honour
and the proceedings of the House from attack, a task
in which he was always aided by members scrupulously
observing the unwritten rule that the word of a
member is the word of a gentleman, and must be
accepted without dispute.
This rule for " taking down words," like another
which became obsolete, was never discarded. A rule to
enforce the attendance of members by a " call of the
House," which Hatsell in the eighteenth century
regarded as a relic of the dark ages, was adopted in
1854. Moved only four times, it was either defeated
or withdrawn, and was never invoked while the House
sat in the new buildings. Yet it appeared in each
edition* of the Standing Rules and Orders.
Herein lay a further characteristic of the House :
its conservatism, no matter what political party held
the reins of government. Rules that emerged from
the mists of antiquity, fashioned from experience,
* The original rules printed in 1854 were reprinted ;n 1861, together with a
few additions that had been made and some House of Commons rules that applied
to the Cape House ; in 1864 the Cape rules were again reprinted, and it was not
until 1883 that they were rc::ised. In 1896 they were reprinted with a few more
additions; in 1900 they were again revised, and in 1906 the last edition of
the rules was printed with, slight alterations.
THE COLONEL BLOWS HIS OWN TRUMPET,
COL. THE HON. F. SCHERMBRUCKER (h. njjj,. J. iw-n
In early life he distinguished himself a.-, a fret- lance in politics
and a brave soldier. He was a member of the House in 1868.
of the Legislative Council from 1882 to 1888 and again o( the
Hou'-e of Assembly from 1889 until his death. He was an adroit
speaker with a fund of good humour (sec p. 69).
From a caricature hv W H. SchroiVr in " T\,t C'ar<- Lantern." 1S.S7.
STABILITY OF PROCEDURE. 81
tempered with cold calculation and tested by practice,
were particularly venerated, and when a change was
suggested, the necessity for the change rather than
the utility of the new rule had first to be proved.
Thus when in 1889 it was proposed that there should
be a committee of selection to nominate the members
of select committees, the motion was negatived, and
when in 1895 it was proposed that proceedings on
public bills should not be terminated by prorogation,
the motion met the same fate. Yet both of these rules
might have been useful, as their recent adoption by
the Union House has shown.
Stability of procedure was always the watchword.
It is almost better that the law of Parliament should
be certain than that it should be sound," William
Porter had once remarked, and for the tradition that
prevented unnecessary tinkering with the rules members
had much to be thankful, since even the best of them
sometimes showed that, stable as the procedure was,
they had some difficulty in remembering it. So old
a Parliamentary hand as Mr. Sauer (who, in 1896,
was whispered to be a candidate for the Chair) once
insisted that he had a perfect right to " name a
member for disorder — that dreaded right which is
vested in the Speaker alone ; and even Sir Gordon
Sprigg so far forgot that " the House " was just as
much an individual as himself, as to move that " This
House agrees by a majority " to a certain course of
IN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
action, and, what is more, the motion was adopted
by the House !
Another old rule to which the Cape House rarely
had recourse related to the exclusion from its precincts
of all and sundry who were not members. Centuries
ago Elsygne, the Clerk of the House of Commons in
the Long Parliament, who resigned before Cromwell
carried off the mace, wrote on the exclusion of
strangers that " the House often runs into great heats
on this subject," and added that " it is a necessary
but unpleasant part of the Speaker's duty to determine
whether individual applications for admission come
within the customary exceptions."
The Cape House seldom ran " into great heats
on this subject " ; but in 1888 there was a notable
exception. A certain newspaper in Cape Town had
long nursed a grievance against the officials of the
House, and freely indulged in gibes and jeers at their
expense. When Mr. Sauer accidentally brushed off
the Clerk's (Mr. Noble's) wig, this newspaper went
into ecstasies of delight and chuckled in print. It
was for ever teasing the Speaker, and towards the end
of the session took full advantage of an unfortunate
escapade of one of its journalists.
The journalist, while in the Press gallery behind
the Speaker's Chair, espied a friend sitting in the
Speaker's gallery at the opposite end of the House,
and with the coolest effrontery in the world broke
WHOSE HOUSE IS IT? 83
every rule of the Press gallery by calmly strolling
through the side galleries — private secretaries, heads
of departments, distinguished strangers, and Govern-
ment House — in full view of the House, in order that
he might have a chat with him !
A messenger was sent in pursuit, and a policeman
told to turn him out in case of trouble. The journalist
was furious. ' Whose House is it ? " he screamed
(again in print) almost every day during the following
week. Was not a member of the Press gallery as good
as a member of the House ? Who were the flunkeys
who dared tell him where his proper place was ? How
came it that the Speaker only could issue tickets ?—
and a hundred other questions. A few members
backed up his complaint in the House, and the matter
was referred to the Select Committee on Internal
Arrangements ; but all this pother had only the effect
of placing a room at the disposal of the Press gallery,
in which the -members of the " Fourth Estate" might
make themselves tea and transcribe their notes — and this
on the suggestion mildly made by another journal !
Speaker and Clerk were so viciously lampooned
for what, at the worst, was only a crude application of
a time-honoured rule, that it is rather a pity that the
following verses, from a long manuscript poem sent
by an anonymous author to the Clerk of the House,
are only now published. The verses are addressed to
the journalist who caused the commotion :—
84 IN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
And think, although you may be somewhat late,
That you, a " member of the Fourth Estate,"
Were best employed in backing up the laws
Than breaking them yourself — without a cause,
Attacking those who with an easy grace
Just push you back into your proper place.
Don't enter where you have no right to be,
No stranger you, but an habituee
And un-" distinguished " but for idle " gas,"
Which only helps to show you are an as-
Sailant to wholesome rules by wise men made
Not to be broken, but to be obeyed.
As to the work of the House, most people know
that for many years country members were paid for
ninety days' absence from home and that it was not
often that they were away for a longer period. In
the Goede Hoop Lodge, however, when country
members were paid for only fifty days and local
members were not paid at all, sessions often lasted
longer than three months, and once (in 1863) extended
to five and a half months. After responsible government
was granted in 1872 there was a noticeable drop m
the length of the sessions, but once the House settled
down it always worked in earnest. Private members
had far more initiative than the pressure of Govern-
ment work allows them now, and notwithstanding
the constitutional principle that Ministers should be
THE ORDER LIST. 85
responsible for the good government of the country,
the tendency for private members to introduce public
bills was, if anything, on the increase in the later
days of the Cape House. The " Innes " Liquor Act,
the " Beck " Election Act and the " Juta " Irrigation
Act are among the well-known statutes introduced
by private members, and one member (Mr. Jagger)
alone introduced as many as six public bills in five
years and succeeded in passing half of them.
No doubt it was the small amount of time
specifically allotted to the Government under the
rules that accounted for the artistry of the Order
Paper. So as to get the greatest amount of work done
in the shortest time, days were as carefully planned
out as a traveller maps his course. In consultation
with the Clerk of the House the Prime Minister would
daily plot to pass his measures by dangling a " plum '
just within, or sometimes just beyond, the reach of
members. The plum was some subject which the
House was anxious to handle, and the path which led
to it lay over thorny little questions that the Govern-
ment wanted to see out of the way. And thus it often
came about that members with pockets bulging with
notes for the big affair actively helped to clear the
Paper.
Yet even this House was sometimes justly accused
of hasty legislation. There was, for instance, the
remarkable case in 1894 when the Paarl Tramways
86 IN THE 'NEW BUILDINGS.
Private Bill was hurried through its stages at such
a pace that only after it had been passed by both
Houses was it discovered that a clause imposing a
penalty had not had the amount of the penalty filled
in. Fortunately the mistake was found before the
Governor had given his assent to the measure. It
happened in the last week of the session, but there
was just time for the Governor to exercise his right
of returning the Bill with the necessary amendment,
and to have it adopted before Parliament was pro-
rogued. The Speaker (Sir David Tennant) was much
perturbed at the slur cast on the House, and spoke
his mind freely, but this did not prevent several other
bills from being passed in a hurry or similar lapses
from occurring.
From being the official masters of the House before
responsible government was introduced, the Govern-
ment, after the introduction of the system in 1872,
became, in theory, only the agents of Parliament, but
virtually they remained the masters — with this
difference : that being no longer permanent officials
they depended for their existence on the confidence
placed in their proposals. It is true that in the Cape,
even after responsible government was granted, it was
not necessary for a Minister to be a member of
Parliament. Mr. Stockenstrom and Sir Richard
Solomon were Attorneys-General for a short time
without having seats in either House, just as Mr.
MINISTERIAL RESPONSIBILITY. 87
Gladstone was once Secretary of State without being
a member of Parliament. But such a position was
recognised as unsound, and when it came to passing
a contentious measure Ministers became at times
only too glad to. regard themselves as ordinary
members of the House, if the House would let them,
pleading that this or that was really a matter for
Parliament to decide.
Thus Sir Gordon Sprigg in 1890, when Prime
Minister, introduced a railway scheme involving over
seven and a half millions, and submitted to several
defeats on the various items before the House made
it clear that the Government must hold definite
opinions on such important matters of policy, and
must stand or fall by its opinions. Sir Gordon Sprigg
resigned and Rhodes took office, but in 1898 there
was a far more extraordinary case.
After the general election in 1898 Sir Gordon
Sprigg, once more Prime Minister, finding his party,
returned by some fifty thousand electors, practically
equal to the Opposition, which was returned by only
thirty-five thousand electors, decided to bring in a
bill to provide for a more proportionate representation.
This he did on the second day of the ensuing session,
but before he got any further with the bill he was
defeated on a motion of no confidence, and Mr.
Schremer took office. Now Mr. Schremer maintained
that numbers were of little significance and held,
88 AY THE NEW BUILDINGS.
with Pliny, that it was the ownership of land that
counted. " Look at the land that we on the Govern-
ment side represent," he exclaimed, and then proposed
that Sprigg's bill should be shelved and the whole
matter gone into during the recess.
The debate waxed warm, and the two parties being
almost evenly matched, a deadlock arose. What was
to be done ? Mr. D. C. de Waal, a Bondsman and a
supporter of the Government, fearing that a very
desirable Railway Bill before the House would be
dropped if the deadlock continued, took a course
which was as singular as it is difficult to reconcile with
the principles of responsible government. He moved
that a suggestion thrown out by Mr. Rhodes early
in the debate should be formally endorsed by the
House : that the Premier (Mr. Schreiner) and the
leader of the Opposition (Sir Gordon Sprigg), together
with a few members to be nominated by them should
form a conference to devise a compromise. The move
was made with dramatic suddenness, the party whips
cracked, and Ministers at once gathered together in
an impromptu Cabinet meeting, while one of them
scoured the buildings to see what damage had been
done. Mr. Schreiner admitted frankly to the House
that he did not like the proposal — it was not practical
politics for one thing — and if it were agreed to he
would have to " consider the position. Mr. Theron,
the President of the Bond, and Sir Frederic de Waal,
A UNIQUE CONFERENCE. 89
then the Secretary, strongly opposed the motion, but
the adverse vote of one member of the party was
enough to nullify the Government majority.
On Friday, the 4th of November, 1898, the House
came to a division. Every member was present, and
when the tellers handed in their division lists, Mr.
Speaker Berry announced that thirty-nine were for
the conference and thirty-nine against, and that to
keep the question open he would give his casting vote
for the conference. The Opposition cheered loud and
long at their victory, and shortly afterwards the House
adjourned. The Government used the week-end in
which to ruminate, and when the House re-assembled
on the Monday, Mr. Schremer was able to say that
he had, as promised, ' considered the position, " and
had decided to appoint the conference.
It was a conference unique in the history of
responsible government, to be sure, but the result
was satisfactorv to both parties. Mr. Schremer, Mr.
Sauer and Dr. te Water, for the Government, and
Sir Gordon Sprigg, Mr. Rhodes and Sir James Rose
Innes for the Opposition, hammered out a compromise.
The old bill was withdrawn, and a new one introduced
and passed.
In England, where Ministries as a rule resign
after defeats of any political significance, the authority
of Parliament over the Government is implied more
clearly than in the colonies where, owing to the
90 IN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
comparatively small legislatures, defeats are more
likely to occur from the defection of a few members.
Until 1868 it was even considered necessary in
England for a Government defeated at the polls to
admit its subservience by finally accepting defeat in
Parliament.
Twice a semblance of this old doctrine found its
way into the Parliamentary history of the Cape, but
on both occasions it was uncertain whether the
Government had actually been beaten at the polls.
The first instance was rather curious. Scanlen was
Prime Minister and accepted defeat in 1884 over so
small a thing as a " bug " —an insect pest that had
made its appearance in the Colony — although the real
cause of defeat was a notice of motion given by the
Premier the previous day, in which it was proposed
to cut ofl certain portions of the Transkeian Territories
from the Cape ; while the second instance was Spngg's
defeat by Schreiner after the general election of 1898.
Altogether twelve Ministries sought the confidence
of the Cape Parliament ; all were its virtual masters
and all felt its lash. High hopes had been entertained
for its success, and when the end came with the advent
of Union, Mr. Merriman, the last Premier, was able
to proclaim with a clear conscience that these hopes
had not been in vain.
Its legislation had been liberal, and its control of
finance had never flagged ; its character was undefiled
DEBATING CHAMBER. HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY, 1910.
On the Speaker s neht Mr. Mernrnan and several members of
his Ministry may be distinguished.
From a photograph by K Pfers (" Hood's Stvdio "\ Cape Town
VALEDICTION. 91
and its little faults had only endeared it to members.
In it men had " found their own level," had loved and
hated, had bitten the dust or achieved renown. Some
had learned for the first time how to take defeat v/ith
a smile and hope to win another day. Historical
friendships had been formed and Death had claimed
its toll. Hence there was a note of sadness rather than
of boastfulness in the valedictory speeches made
when Parliament broke up on the 9th of April, 1910.
I do think," said Mr. Mernman, who had done as
much for the House during the second half of its
existence as William Porter had done during the first
half— ' I do think that we may be proud of the
character that this Cape Parliament has obtained. We
have had many years of stress and strain, but we have
had no unseemly scenes, and there has not been the
slightest reflection on the purity of the House in any
degree. ... I hope that those of us who are
fortunate enough to obtain seats in the Union Parlia-
ment will carry into it the high traditions of the
Parliament which is now breaking up, and by so doing
build up the future character of the Parliament of
South Africa."
Much of the lustre that was shed by the Old Cape
House was undoubtedly due to the brilliancy of some
of its members— of whom only a few have been
mentioned — the soundness of its rules, and the influence
of a clean Executive Government. But experience in
92 IN THE NEW BUILDINGS.
other Parliaments has shown that under one Speaker
the same House may be at least as orderly as it was
disorderly under another, and if one seeks for an
explanation of all that " the Old Cape House " came
to mean it is principally to its own Speakers that one
must turn.
The Speakers of the Cape House.
I.
The
Honourable
Sir Christoffel
Brand, Kt.,
D.C.L., LL.D.
1854-1874.
HON. SIR CHRISTOFFEL BRAND, D.C.L., LL.D.
Speaker of the HOIHL- of Assembly, 1 854-! 874.
Drawn from photographs.
I.
The Hon. Sir Christoffel Brand,
Kt., DC.L., LL.D.
1854—1874.
TO us who live in the turmoil of the twentieth
century it is a far cry to the days when Captain
Cook, in the reign of King George the Third,
ploughed the seas to Australia by way of the Cape.
Yet the grandfather of the first Speaker of the House of
Assembly (of whom many South Africans still have
a personal recollection) was a great friend of this illus-
trious captain, and we learn from an old number of the
Cape Monthly Magazine that on the visit of the last
expedition to Simon's Bay on its way home after
Captain Cook had met his death, Mr. Brand, then
the Resident at Simonstown, was much affected at
the sight of the ships returning without their old
commander.
Old Mr. Brand, who was still Resident in 1795
when the English fleet arrived in Simon's Bay to take
possession of the Colony on behalf of the Prince of
Orange, received and passed on nearly all the communi-
cations leading up to the landing of General Craig and
the fight at Muizenberg. The Colony changed hands,
MR. WEAKER BRAND.
but he remembered his friends, and when his grandson,
the future Speaker, was born at Simonstown on the 21st
of June, 1797, it was on account of a lasting affection
for Sir Joseph Banks, the naturalist who accompanied
Captain Cook, that Chnstoffel Joseph Brand was
given his second Christian name.
Like his father, Mr. J. H. Brand, who was appointed
a member of the old Court of Justice, Chnstoffel soon
manifested a leaning towards the study of law, and
on leaving school, at the age of sixteen, he entered
the office of a well-known Cape Town attorney, Mr.
J. S. Mernngton. Two years afterwards he proceeded
to the University of Leyden, where he took his degree
of Doctor of Civil Law and also that of Doctor in
Literature. His thesis for the former degree was
entitled De Jure Coloniarum, and so boldly demanded
a more responsible position for the colonies that it is
not surprising to find that on his return to the Cape
at the age of twenty-four he intimately associated
himself with the leading questions ot the day. He
identified himself with the Press, and, through the
columns of the Zuid j4frikaan, became the vehement
opponent of the Government and a keen antagonist to
Mr. John Fairbairn, then the leader of the Press,
until events connected with the anti-convict agitation
and the movement lor representative government
led to a partial reconciliation.
But Mr. Brand did not neglect the career upon
A FEARLESS ADVOCATE. QQ
which he had originally embarked. Gifted with a
retentive memory and studying law, " not as a man
does who regards it only as a means of his own livelihood
but as a student who loves his subject for its own
sake," he by degrees built up a great reputation for
himself as a profound lawyer and a fearless advocate.
He was more than once offered a seat on the Bench,
but fearing the possibility of having to don the black
cap on the finding of an incompetent jury, never
accepted it.
In 1850 he was appointed a member of the Legis-
lative Council, but resigned a few days later, when it
was stated by the Government that the Council would
be required to consider several matters besides the
draft of the new constitution then before it. And
when the constitution came into force three years
later and elections were held for the first Parliament
in the Cape Mr. Brand, who was by that time at the
head of his profession, was, without a contest, elected
a member of the House of Assembly for Stellenbosch.
The House met in the Banqueting Hall of the
Goede Hoop Lodge on the 30th of June, 1854, and
it was at once evident that the choice of Speaker lay
between Mr. Brand and his eld rival, Mr. Fairbairn.
Mr. Barry moved that " Mr. John Fairbairn do take
the Chair of this House as Speaker," while Mr.
Memtjes, seconded by Mr. C. A. Fairbridge, moved
that " Mr. ChristofTel Joseph Brand do take the
ioo_ ME. SPEAKER BRAND.
Chair of this House as Speaker." Mr. Fairbairn could
not have expected much support from the Eastern
Party, and when both candidates had addressed the
House and retired, the first motion was put and nega-
tived by twenty-four votes to nineteen. On the other
mot'ion being put, the voting was reversed, and Mr.
Brand was declared elected by a majority of five.
" Mr. Brand," the Journals state, " was then conducted
to the Chair by his mover and seconder and, having
expressed his humble acknowledgments to the House,
took the Chair."
Mr. Fairbairn, be it said, was the first to congratulate
the Speaker and the House upon its choice. He bore
his rival no grudge, and at the end of the session,
in true parliamentary spirit, took the opportunity
of formally moving " That this House cannot separate
without expressing the obligation the members feel
themselves under to the Speaker of this House for
his judicious, able, patient, and courteous conduct
during the session."
At this time Mr. Brand lived in Boom Street (now
called Commercial Street), which at one time had been
a fashionable quarter of Caoe Town, and one can
picture him, a short man in antiquated surtout and
stock, sitting on the high stoep placidly helping himself
to liberal pinches of snuff while receiving the con-
gratulations of his friends. House and stoep have
since disappeared. They have made way for a modern
DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED. 101
cabinet factory and the typical Dutch buildings of
his neighbours, shorn of their surroundings and sadly
neglected have, for the most part, been converted
into registered boarding-houses for the coloured com-
munity ! Mr. Brand never lived long in one house,
but much of his time was spent in his chambers (one
of the rooms now occupied by the Police Court) in
Wale Street, for, although he bestowed incessant care
on his work in the House during the session, like Thomas
Richardson, a Speaker in the reign of James the First,
he continued to practise as a barrister.
For several reisons his term of office was fraught
with singular difficulties. He had to bear the brunt
of his political utterances prior to his election, he
was without Cape precedents to guide him, and there
were many members who little realised their responsi-
bilities. Strength of character, however, coupled
with the advantages derived from his legal training
and knowledge of constitutional law, enabled him
from the outset to exhibit a sound conception of the
functions of his office. Occasionally he would corres-
pond with Sir Erskine May on points of procedure
and assimilating the practice of the House of Commons
by methodically entering excerpts from standard
works of reference in note books kept for that purpose
he was able to enforce his authority in a manner which
surprised many of his intimate friends.
Thus in 1855, when the House was in Committee
102 MR. SPEAKER BRAND.
on the Report of the Select Committee on the Burgher
Force Bill, Dr. Tancred having " made himself guilty
of interruption in the due proceedings of the Committee
and of improper and disorderly conduct and disobedience
to the decision of the Chairman," Mr. Speaker did
not hesitate to save the dignity of the House by acting
on the precedents established in the House of Commons
on one or two rare occasions. He immediately resumed
the Chair, called the attention of Dr. Tancred to the
charges preferred against him, and told him that if he
desired to explain he might do so in his place, but if he
intended to answer the charges brought against him
he should do so at the bar of the House.
Dr. Tancred said he thought he would like to
explain ; but he did so in such a manner that the
Speaker again called him to order, and rising from
his seat, pointed out to Dr. Tancred in particular
and the House in general the error of their ways. " Let
not the members of this House forget," he said in
measured terms, ' that we are here assembled for
the good of the country. On the subjects which are
submitted for our consideration various opinions are
entertained, and strongly too ; but if a majority have
come to a certain decision, let the minority submit."
Dr. Tancred thereupon promised to behave himself
better in future, but no sooner had he been forgiven
and the committee was once more at work, than he
forgot all his good intentions and made things so lively
FIRMNESS. 103
that the Chairman declared he could no longer go on
with the business and the Speaker once more took
the Chair. The jovial doctor was placed at the bar
of the House, and after he had made a statement
was marched off by the Sergeant-at-Arms only to be
brought back and once more forgiven on the same day
upon his stating that if he had given offence it was
quite unintentional and he regretted it.
The firm attitude taken up by the Speaker on all
such occasions* was greatly appreciated by the House,
and at the close of the first Parliament, in 1858, Mr.
Fairbairn again took the opportunity to place on
record the high sense it entertained of the ' faithful,
judicious, firm and temperate conduct of Mr. Speaker
and of the indefatigable devotion of his talents and
learning to the regulation of its proceedings and of
the uniform courtesy which he has manifested towards
the members of this House." The motion reflected
the feeling of the House, and was carried by acclamation
—all the members rising.
At the meeting of the second Parliament on the
16th of March, 1859, Mr. Brand was unanimously
re-elected Speaker of the House of Assembly. Amongst
other important work transacted by this Parliament
the motion in favour of responsible government attracted
* During a scene of great excitement on Molteno s motion for Responsible
Government on 4th June, 1863, Sir ChnstofTel Brand declared the sitting sus-
pended until 8 p.m. and left the Chair. At the request of Mr. Walter, however,
he resumed the Chair and the debate was formally adjourned.
104 MR. SPEAKER BRAND.
a good deal of attention and gave rise to a rather amusing
incident.
The motion was down for Tuesday, the 22nd
of May, 1860, and the Speaker's gallery, such as it
was in the Goede Hoop Lodge, was filled with ladies,
while the public gallery was overflowing. The occasion
was regarded with particular solemnity, and the Speaker
after reading prayers, exhorted all who were to engage
in the coming struggle to remember the rules and not
to do anything out of time or place. Suddenly there
was a rat-a-tat-tat on the green baize screen which
divided the House from the public, and Mr. Josias
Rivers, the Governor's Aide-de-Camp, dashed up
to the Table without the slightest announcement to
deliver a message on the contemplated visit of His
Royal Highness Prince Alfred. The Speaker was
aghast. " Mr. Speaker," say the Journals, " called
the Sergeant-at-Arms to the Table, and directed
him if in future a messenger come to the House, to
inform him that he is desired on his entrance to the
House to observe towards the House due obeisance,
according to the Rules of the House ; " " and the
Sergeant," was the less sober comment of the jQjgus
a few days later, " placed his hand on his sword-
handle and looked as if he would just like to see that
white choker and silk facings try it on again ! "
About two months after this incident the Colonial
Aide-de-Camp brought over to the House a message
KNIGHTHOOD. 105
which more nearly affected the Speaker. It was to
say that it was the intention of his Grace .the Duke
of Newcastle to recommend Mr. C. J. Brand to Her
Majesty for the dignity of knighthood by letters patent ;
and on the next day, the last of that session, the House
recommended that the fees attendant on the issue
of the letters patent should be met out of the public
revenue. Mr. Speaker, so doughty on other occasions,
was deeply touched by this graceful act, and could
only say : ' The House will allow me to express to
the House my humble thanks."
But the Speaker's path was not strewn with roses,
and his words were not idle when on being re-elected
in 1859 he had appealed to members for their full
confidence and co-operation. For the part he had
played in politics before his election had been important
and there was always a sprinkling of members who
were inclined to attribute his actions to political motives,
It should be remembered, too, that in those days
the issues before the country were far less complicated
than they are to-day, and underlying all was the
provincial question of East versus West. With few
exceptions members dropped automatically into the
one camp or the other. The Speaker scrupu-
lously avoided coming into contact with either of the
parties, but he did not escape criticism. His casting
vote was consequently an unending source of trouble,
and on at least one occasion necessitated a long ex-
io6 MR. SPEAKER BRAND.
planation to the House. On the 15th of July, 1862,
a thin House could not make up its mind whether
it truly represented the country, and whether or no
the Governor should be requested by address to dissolve
Parliament in order to take the sense of the country
on certain questions.
Thirteen — that unlucky number ! — were of one
opinion, and thirteen of the other. The Speaker gave
his casting vote for the address, and the fat was in
the fire. He explained his reasons at the time, but
this was not enough. The resolution was shortly
afterwards rescinded by twenty votes to fifteen, and
both in and out of the House unpleasant things were
said. The Speaker's feelings, although well hidden
by his mask-like face, were known to lie with a certain
section of the House, and with that section he had
given his vote ; and gossips out of doors pointed to
the fact that the Speaker's son, Mr. (afterwards
President) J. H. Brand, had also voted for the
address.
So, before beginning the business of the next day,
the Speaker entered into a lengthy exposition of the
grounds upon which he gave his casting vote, and
warmly disclaimed having been influenced in his decision
by any desire to further the objects of any clique
or party, and after defending the vote on legal and
constitutional grounds he added for the information
of the gossips that he and his son never discussed
A TROUBLESOME RESIGNATION. 107
matters connected with their parliamentary or pro-
fessional work.
The leaders of the House were quick to reassure
its venerable Speaker that he was above suspicion,
and that he had done more for the House than they
could possibly say, but on his re-election for the third
time, at Grahamstown, in 1864, he once more empha-
sised how necessary it was for him to have the unbounded
confidence of the entire House.
In that same year (1864), however, there took
place what was probably the most unpleasant incident
in his career — an incident which grew out of all pro-
portion to its importance and even threatened to under-
mine that confidence he had sacrificed so much to
earn.
The whole matter began by two members, Mr.
Chabaud, that ' hairbramed, mad-cap, excitable
fellow," and Mr. Aspelmg betting at a Grahamstown
club table one Friday evening. Mr. Chabaud for
some unearthly reason wagered that at three o'clock
on the following Monday afternoon he would no longer
be a member. Aspelmg having accepted the bet
Chabaud straightway wrote a letter of resignation
to the Speaker, handed it to a messenger and then
straightway changed his mind. But the letter had
by this time reached the Speaker, who was dining
not far off. Now it happened that the Speaker, as
he afterwards stated, was not well, and was on the
io8 ME. SPEAKER BRAND.
point of going to bed, so after glancing cursorily at
the letter he gave it to Mr. Neethling, who was dining
with him, and remarking that it looked as if Mr.
Ghabaud was going to resign, asked Mr. Neethling to
show it to Mr. Molteno. With the letter once more
in his possession the Speaker then went to bed and half
an hour later Mr. Molteno called on him and said he
was authorised by Mr. Chabaud to ask that it might
be returned.
The Speaker handed the letter back, and when
the House met at two o'clock the next day stated
the facts. The Constitution Ordinance provided,
however, that " it shall be lawful for any member
of the House, by writing under his hand addressed
to the Speaker of the House of Assembly, to resign
his seat ; and upon such resignation the seat of such
member shall become vacant." Then arose a conun-
drum : When is a member not a member ? Had
Mr. Chabaud the right to withdraw his resignation
once it had been sent to the Speaker ?
A Select Committee was appointed to find the
answer, but after sitting for four days and cross-ex-
amining the Speaker, the President and the Attorney-
General, as well as others who were concerned, it could
only report that it was unable to solve the riddle or
even express an opinion.
The report was considered on the 28th of June,
and Mr. Scanlen moved that it was not in the discretion
THE CASTING VOTE. 109
of the House to reinstate Mr. Chabaud. But matters
had now taken a new turn, and the Speaker's conduct
was seriously criticised. Mr. Solomon, ever the
Speaker's champion, tried his utmost to keep the debate
within its proper limits, but many hard things were
said against the veteran in the Chair. At last the
House divided, and it was found that nineteen were
for the motion and nineteen against, so that once more
the Speaker was called upon to give his casting vote.
He carried out the painful duty with the utmost fear-
lessness. He saw no means of keeping the question
open and so, according to the rules — not rules of the
House, but rules of action which Speakers usually
adopt — he gave his honest and conscientious personal
opinion, which was with the " Noes." Shortly after
the decision had been given Mr. Chabaud resumed
his seat amidst the cheers of a few of the Western
members.
But in reality things had gone from bad to worse,
and two days later Mr. Painter, seconded by Mr.
Scanlen, moved a substantive motion to the effect
that the Speaker had failed in his duty to the House.
The House went into Committee on the motion, and
the Speaker, exercising his undoubted right, attended
the Committee in his capacity of a member and made
a most powerful speech in defence of his conduct.
It was said by his contemporaries that Sir Chnstoffel
was not a polished orator, and that he was at all times
no MR. SPEAKER BRAND.
placed at a disadvantage when he spoke in English,
but on this occasion he totally eclipsed the speakers
who had arrayed themselves against him. He handled
the case as only a lawyer could, deprecated the un-
mannerly tone of the attacks made against him, and
concluded by declaring that if the House adopted
the resolution he would resign on the following morning.
I thank the Committee," he said, " for allowing
me to say this much in vindication of my character —
a character which, whatever may be the result of
this discussion, I have maintained unblemished during
the ten years that I have faithfully, honestly and
fearlessly served the House." The result was that the
motion before the House was negatived and a vote
of confidence, proposed by Mr. Solomon, was carried.
There can be no doubt that by the efforts of a
few members, aided by the Editor of the Qreal pastern
(R. W. Murray), a mountain had been made out of
a molehill, and when his first wife died suddenly four
years later the House showed both respect and sympathy
by adjourning for two days directly it received the
sad intelligence.
And there was no doubt as to his fourth, and,
alas, his last election to the Chair in 1874. Mr. Fair-
bridge, who had seconded his election twenty years
before, referred in glowing terms to the services he
had rendered the House, and Mr. P. J. A. Watermeyer,
who had been in the House for sixteen years, bore
FAILING HEALTH. in
testimony to the regard in which they always held that
" much respected gentleman."
But Sir ChristofTel was not long to preside over their
deliberations. He looked well enough when Parliament
met, but his hearing had lately been growing bad,
and now, nearly seventy-eight years old, his health
failed him. On the 15th of June of the same year he
wrote that he was prevented by illness from attending
the House, and two days later he wrote from Madeira
House resigning his office. A vote of thanks for his
great services was almost immediately proposed and
passed amidst mingled feelings of pride in the Speaker,
that had so long upheld the reputation of the House,
and regret at the loss sustained.
Parliament also marked its sense of appreciation
of his valued services by passing an Act bestow-
ing on him a pension of £1,000 a year, which
was equal to the salary he had been drawing.
Well wrapped up he was able before the close of the
session to attend in his place as a member and express
his grateful acknowledgments, but he enjoyed the
pension for less than a year.
He grew weaker every day, and while the House
was sitting on the 19th of May, 1875, news was received
that he had " departed this life at a quarter past
four ' that afternoon in his rooms at Madeira House.
Both Houses of Parliament adjourned for the day of
the funeral, when his remains, followed by a procession
ii2 MR. SPEAKER BRAND.
over a mile long, were conveyed to the underground
family vault (since plundered by godless thieves)
in the Dutch Reformed burial grounds in Somerset
Road.
Sir Christoffel Brand was the highest Mason in
South Africa, and it is reported that he held this position
in greater pride than any other he had occupied, but
there are many who will remember him not for this
position or because he was a great lawyer, or because
of his many covert acts of kindness, or even because
he was the first Speaker of the Cape House, but because,
as Speaker, he laid the foundation of the great repu-
tation for orderliness and decorum which the House
always maintained.
II.
The
Honourable
Sir David
Tennant,
K.C.M.G.
1874-1896.
HON. SIR DAVID TENNANT. K.C.M.G.
Speaker of the House of Assembly, 1874 -1896.
IV.iwn from pWciKiaphs.
II.
The Honourable Sir David Tennant,
K.C.M.G.
1874-1896.
IN the Hofmeyr collection there is a curious old draw-
ing, entitled " De Kaapstad of Tafel Valey." It
shows the upper part of Cape Town as it was a
hundred years ago : a handful of whitewashed houses,
sheltered by clusters of foliage. Under the houses are
the names of the owners — many of them well-known
Cape families, such as Brand, Hofmeyr, de Kock,
Brink, Dempers, Smuts, and van Breda — and on the
extreme left of the picture, under the homestead known
as " Zonnebloem," the name 'Tennant' is easily
discernible.
It was here, on the slopes of the Devil's Peak,
overlooking the little town and the broad sweep of
Table Bay, with its tall East Indiamen, that Alexander
Tennant, the " Singing Sannock " of Burns' " Epistle
to James Tait of Glenconnor,"" settled down at the
close of the eighteenth century. Generous and warm-
hearted, with left eyebrow slightly raised, he was a
" And, Lord, remember Singing Sannock.
Wi' hale breeks. saxprnce and a bannock. "
n6 ME. SPEAKER TENNANT.
Tennant all over — one of those Tennants of Glenconnor
among whose descendants are numbered the late Sir
Charles Tennant and his daughter Mrs. Asquith.
Alexander Tennant was on his way to India, but,
like a wise man, altered his plans. He remained at the
Cape, married, and had eight children. His second
son, Hercules, sometime Civil Commissioner and
Resident Magistrate at Uitenhage, married Sir
Chnstoffel Brand's sister, and it was their son David
who eventually became Speaker.
Although there was some talk of his entering the
Church, David Tennant was one of the four out of
five Cape Speakers who adopted law as a profession.
He was born in Cape Town on the 10th of January,
1829, and, having been articled to Mr. John Reid
("Honest Johnny"), was at the age of twenty admitted
to practise as an attorney of the Supreme Court.
As a boy he had been industrious ; as a man he
now showed himself to be indefatigable. 'Deus dabit
vela (God will fill the sails) was the family motto,
and by dint of sheer industry David Tennant made his
own sails and then trimmed them to catch the breeze.
Combining office and residence under one roof in
Grave Street, he literally lived with his work, while
in addition to his profession he was, among other
things, confidential and legal adviser to the Bishop
of Cape Town, Registrar of the Diocese as well as
Registrar of the Province of South Africa, a member
Q UALIF1CA TIONfi. 1 1 7
of the University Council, and chairman of the South
African College Council. He carefully edited the
valuable " Notary's Manual," compiled by his father,
and in 1866 was elected a member of the House of
Assembly for the electoral division of Piquetberg, a
constituency which he continued to represent until his
retirement from Parliament thirty years later.
Before 1875 a Chairman of Committees was
appointed each time the House went into Committee,
but in the eight years during which Mr. Tennant sat
in the House under the Speakership of his uncle, Sir
Chnstoflel Brand, he came to be appointed to that
position far oftener than any other member ; moreover,
when on a holiday in Europe in 1872, he had been able
to study the manners and customs of several European
Parliaments. Consequently, when Sir Chnstoffel wrote
in 1874 to say that he was prevented by illness from
attending the House, Mr. Tennant was appointed
Acting Speaker without opposition, and when a few
days later Sir Chnstoffel resigned, David Tennant
was unanimously elected to fill his place.
The sails he had so carefully trimmed were now
well filled, but still he allowed himself no rest.
Immediately severing his connection with his old work,
he devoted the whole of his time to the work of the
House, even going so far as to keep, in his own neat
hand, records that might easily have been delegated
to others, and soon became, as Mr. Porter had said
n8 MR. SPEAKER TENNANT.
of his predecessor, " as familiar with May and Gushing
as with van der Linden and Voet."
Sir ChristoffeFs long term of office had covered
only two years of responsible government, and the
practice of the House had still to be adapted to the
new conditions, while the growth of business further
demanded modifications and additions to the rules.
With great zeal Mr. Tennant set about revising the
existing rules, and at the beginning of the next year
(1875) was able to lay the result of his labours on the
Table. In 1881 he drew up rules for the guidance of
Select Committees. In 1883 he filled a long felt want
by framing rules for the Committee of Ways and
Means as well as suggesting further additions to the
Standing Rules and Orders. In 1885, when the office
of the Parliamentary Draftsman was transferred from
the department of the Attorney-General, he drafted
rules to be observed by that officer, and three years
later laid down others for the guidance of the Sergeant-
at-Arms.
So careful was the House not to make any rash
innovation, however, that eight years elapsed before
the revised rules he had laid on the Table were
adopted. One of these rules dealing with the presenta-
tion of petitions cut a great slice out of the daily
routine of the House. Until that year every petition
was read at length, and that much time was wasted
before it finally reached a resting place on the Table
PETITIONS. 119
is well shown by the following extract from some lines
published in the Poet's Corner of the ^rgus in 1857 :
The question was put, " Are there any petitions? "
(They come down by post from the country divisions)
" Mr. Speaker," says someone, " I've one to present,
From such a division to me it was sent ;
'Tis icspectfully worded and signed, and the prayer
For relief of some sort, that the House will take care
Of him and his interests and that he alway,
As a matter of course, will continually pray " ;
I move it be read ' ' Who seconds the motion ? "
Half a dozen here rise without any notion
Of what it's about ; however, 'tis reckoned
As good as a speech to get up and second ;
So like Jacks out of boxes they jump up m rows,
But for why or for wherefore there's none of them knows :
' Those who are in favour of petition say aye ?
Those who are against it please to say nay V
The House gives its gracious consent and permission,
" Ayes " have it." The member brings up the petition.
[Here the Clerk reads the petition at length.]
The member then rises and moves that it be
Received ; then to second again two or three
Rise up while the member sits down.
After the adoption of the revised rules only the most
important petitions were read, while by a further
addition in 1896 petitions that were out of order were
120 ME. SPEAKER TENNANT.
rejected by the Speaker without ever having an oppor-
tunity of disturbing the calm deliberations of the House.
At the time of his election the House still held its
meetings in the Goede Hoop Lodge, but steps had
been taken to provide more suitable accommodation
and one glorious day in May of the following year
Mr. Speaker, resplendent in state gown and full-
bottomed wig, surmounted by his three-cornered black
hat, preceded by the Sergeant-at-Arms, bearing the
mace of his office and followed by members, proceeded
down Government Avenue to witness Sir Henry
Barkly laying the foundation-stone of the much needed
buildings that all hoped soon to occupy. But for reasons
already given (see pp. 55-5^) several years were to elapse
and many things of importance were to happen before
the House could take up its new quarters. Two events
were of peculiar interest to the Speaker.
One was the knighthood with which his labours
were rewarded. The honour had been conferred during
the recess, and when the House met in 1878 some
particularly gratifying remarks were made by the
Premier and the leader of the Opposition, who with
the Speaker were cheered not loudly, it is said, but
with that peculiar sound that indicates the satisfaction
of the House.* The other event which took place
a little later in the same session was not so pleasant.
* On the Queen's birthday, 1892, Sir David and Mr. Abbot, the Canadian
Premier, were created Knights Commanders of the Most Distinguished Order of
St. Michael and St. George.
A BELATED RULING. 121
The Molteno ministry had been dismissed by Sir
Bartle Frere, and Mr. Mernman, in a house so crowded
that members of the Legislative Council found their
allotted seats confiscated by the gentler sex, moved a
motion, the second and third paragraphs of which
conveyed a direct censure on the Governor. Mr.
Speaker permitted the debate to continue for several
days and then ruled that as Ministers under a system
of responsible government were responsible for the
action of a Governor, the paragraphs in question were
out of order and should be discharged. The ruling
came like a bolt from the blue and several prominent
members declared they felt staggered. One expressed
pardonable surprise that the discussion had been
allowed to continue for so long, and another thought
he had a precedent that would put the Speaker in a
quandary. But Sir David, who remained calm through-
out the storm, pointed out that there was no analogy
between the case quoted and the question before them,
and reminded the House that a ruling from the Chair
admitted of no argument. If a member disagreed with
it he could put a notice on the paper to bring the
decision under review. The adjournment of the House
was moved, and criticisms came without intermission
until Mr. Solomon poured oil on the troubled waters.
Mr. Solomon was so diminutive that he had to
stand on a stool in order that his head might be above
the level of his desk, but his magnificent brain made
122 .1/7?. SPEAKER TENNANT.
up for his physical shortcomings. He now suggested
that the motion should be amended and considered in
another form at a later date. One member had given
notice, at the Speaker's own instance, that the ruling
should be considered by the House, but after Mr.
Solomon's intervention the whole discussion fizzled out
and with a sigh of relief the Clerk read the next order.
Sir David naturally took a great interest in the
building of the new Houses of Parliament, and it was
with intense satisfaction that in December, 1884, he
was able, with his staff, to move into the red-brick
structure that has since become the home of the Union
Parliament. While the new buildings were being con-
structed. Sir David had been appointed one of a
committee to keep an eye on their progress, and when
the buildings were finished he continued to study the
requirements of the House. A " Suggestion Book "
was kept for members with grievances, and Sir David,
as Chairman of the Internal Arrangements Committee,
did all he could for their comfort. Matters ranging
from the steward's pantry-window and the supply of
nail-brushes to the erection of an imposing Press gallery
behind the Speaker's Chair received equal attention,
and in 1889 he was able to announce that the acoustic
properties of the House would be improved by the
addition of a flat ceiling suspended some ten feet below
the original domed roof.*
* The Debating Chamber is now used as a Dining Ror>m by the Union
Parliament, but the improvised ceiling still remains.
ADMONITION. 123
Sir David, indeed, by his thoughtfulness for others,
came to be regarded with much of the feeling a schoolboy
is supposed to have for his headmaster, and it must have
given him as much pain as it did Mr. Wolf when he
had to admonish that member for publishing in a
newspaper a manuscript return laid on the Table of the
House. Shortly after the offence had been committed,
Mr. Wolf absented himself on urgent private affairs ;
but the culprit was not forgotten. On his return Mr.
Speaker bade him stand up and explain himself. Mr.
Wolf said he really had not meant to do anything wrong,
that he was an ignoramus and knew nought of the
rules, so he was requested to withdraw, and Mr.
Upington suggested that an admonition might meet the
case. The duty, of course, was the Speaker's, and
Mr. Wolf being recalled, Sir David donned his three-
cornered hat and warned the member by name that he
was skating on very thin ice. A few years later he had
occasion to call the attention of the House to a sirmlar
disregard of its rules, but this time he spared the
rod.
The consideration he afforded members was always
apparent. When, for instance, Mr. le Roex in 1891 was
the subject of a motion based on an ungrounded
suspicion, Mr. Speaker asked him beforehand not to
reply to the charge, and on the following day, the
mover having expressed his regret that anything in the
motion submitted by him and adopted by the House
124 MR. SPEAKER TEN N ANT.
conveyed an imputation injurious to the character of the
gentleman concerned, Mr. Speaker said that he thought
a member displayed a proper Christian spirit when,
feeling he had wronged a fellow-member, he imme-
diately retracted the statement and asked that his
retraction should appear in the Journals of the House.
Beyond that, he added, the House could scarcely go,
but he suggested that the offensive words be expunged
from the Journals. Mr. Rhodes was quick to carry the
suggestion into effect, and when others rose to speak
Sir David tactfully remarked that further discussion
was unnecessary ; the matter would drop, and he hoped
that the good feeling which had hitherto characterised
the conduct of business would be maintained.
That his conduct in the Chair was fully appreciated
is one of those happy exceptions to the world's usual
ingratitude. He was elected Speaker five times, in
1874, 1879, 1884, 1889 and 1894, and each time had
praises showered upon him by the statesmen of the
day in an abundance that would have turned the head
of a man less experienced in the affairs of the world.
Sprigg, Merriman, Sauer, Solomon, Scanlen, Hofmeyr,
Rhodes and Fuller — names to conjure with — added
their meed of praise, and in 1893, when Sir David had
occupied the Chair for twenty years, tributes were paid
that gave him more pleasure than had anything before.
Mr. Rhodes, who rose amid cheers to move a vote of
thanks to the Speaker, praised Sir David's tact,
A VOTE OF THANKS. 125
discretion and courtesy : Mr. Sauer extolled his talents,
and Mr. Hofmeyr lauded his impartiality.
Sir David modestly disclaimed the merits attributed
to him. They had overlooked his many failings, he
said, and had spoken only of that which they believed
to be of the best. " But," he added, " I have sought
to keep aloof from political parties. I have tried ever
to keep the balance steady, and, though mixing freely
with parties on both sides, never to commit myself to
either (cheers). If an honour is to be conferred upon
the Speaker, there can be none greater than that which
has just been conferred upon me." And in conclusion
he was able to say that it had never been necessary for
him to speak a harsh word to a single member — a
record which spoke well not only for the orderliness of
the House, as a contemporary remarked, but for the
Speaker's urbanity. His reply was recorded in the
Journals, but his rich voice, which penetrated every
nook and cranny of the House, could only be appreciated
by those who were fortunate enough to be present.
Sir David was an intrepid guardian of those privileges
of the House which he himself had been instrumental
in placing on the Statute Book in 1883. Sometimes,
it is true, he was inclined to be a trifle pedagogic in
drawing members' attention to the rules, but he also
had the rare gift of being witty without detracting from
the respect due to his high office. The story has often
been told of how he corrected the member who, on
126 MR. SPEAKER TENNAST.
the motion that the House do now resolve itself into
Committee and that Mr. Speaker leave the Chair, moved
an amendment that Mr. Speaker leave the Chair this
day six months. ' I trust that the honourable member
will not insist upon moving his amendment in the form
proposed," said Mr. Speaker gravely, " for if it were
agreed to the consequences to the Speaker might be
extremely inconvenient !
His uncle, Sir Christoffel Brand, had also a sense of
humour, although his grim features rarely betrayed his
amusement. When Mr. Painter, in a discussion on the
Frontier question, complained that the state of insecurity
on the frontier was such that " he and other settlers
had often gone to their daily vocations ... to return
in the evening to find their houses burnt over their
heads, their wives widows and their children fatherless,"
— Sir Christoffel looked almost bored. Sir David's
features were more flexible and he was once caught off
his guard by a horrible pun concocted by Mr. Maasdorp.
A very earnest member had times out of number referred
to the wicked acts of a notorious Kafir chief named
Oba. It was Oba this and Oba that until members
were nearly frantic, and one day, when the sins of Oba
had been expatiated on with unusual vehemence, Mr.
Maasdorp jumped up. ' Mr. Speaker," he expostulated
with dramatic gravity and then after a pause for effect,
' Mr. Speakah, is this operah obah ? " The House
shouted with laughter. " Order, order," said the
ARCHAIC PRECEDENTS. 127
Speaker, but it was with obvious difficulty that he checked
a smile that threatened to become a broad grin.
In establishing new precedents for the guidance of
the House sound knowledge of procedure in other
colonies was as indispensable as a thorough acquaintance
with the practice, both ancient and modern, of the House
of Commons, and some of the archaic precedents Sir
David applied were peculiarly apt. When, for instance,
in 1877 and again in 1894 he was disturbed by the un-
seemly rush for the door which took place at 6 p.m. and
1 1 p.m., the usual hours of adjournment, he told the
House that its behaviour was not what it should be, and
quoted for their benefit the rule of Parliament, adopted
some four hundred years before, that " The House do
alway at its rising depart and come forth in comely and
civil sort for the reverence of the House, in turning about
with a low courtesie as they make at their coming into
the House and not unseemly to thrust and throng
out."
On the 26th of February, 1896, on Mr. Rhodes'
suggestion, Sir David assumed the position of Agent-
General in London, and at the opening of the next
session, on the 30th of April, 1896, the Clerk read to
the House a touching letter, in which the Speaker
resigned his office. ' In bidding farewell," ran one
paragraph, " I desire to express to members my firm
and unalterable attachment to the system of Constitu-
tional and Parliamentary Government ; and bee to
128 MR. SPEAKER TENNANT.
assure them that I shall always take a deep and fervent
interest in all that concerns the proceedings of Parlia-
ment . . . To yourselves and the officers of the
House I tender the best thanks for the faithful discharge
of the duties you have so zealously rendered the House."
The next day Sir Gordon Sprigg, in a voice that
was husky from the effects of the misty day — or was it
from emotion ? — moved a motion which placed on
record the thanks of the House for the skilful manner
in which Sir David had invariably applied his compre-
hensive knowledge to the solution of difficult questions.
Sir David had been Speaker for nearly twenty-two
years, a period that, with the exception of Sir Arthur
Onslow's remarkable term of thirty-three years, was
unsurpassed by any Speaker in the British Empire,
and on his resignation an Act was passed settling on
him a pension of £1,200 when his term of office as
Agent-General should expire. Sir David, who was
a Speaker born, was not so successful in his new
capacity, but on his retirement in 1901, when at last
he furled his weather-beaten sails, he was presented
with an appreciative address by his staff, and when he
died in London on the 29th of March, 1905, at 39,
Hyde Park Gardens, the House once more placed on
record its sense of his long and faithful services by
immediately adjourning and passing on the following
day a resolution of sympathy with the deceased Speaker's
family.
III.
The
Honourable
Sir Henry
Juta, Kt.,
K.C., B.A.,
LL.B.,
1896-1898
HON. SIR HENRY JLTA. Kt., K.C., B.A , LL.H.
Speaker of the House of Assembly, 1896 1898.
From full-length portrait l,v P Tennyson-Cole, in the Union Hnusc^
III.
The Honourable Sir Henry Juta,
Kt. K.C., B.A. LL.B.
1896—1898.
GREY hairs are generally recognised as a necessary
qualification for the Speakership. Sir Chnstof-
fel Brand was fifty-eight and Sir David Ten-
nant was forty-six when elected, while Sir John Tiptoft,
who was Speaker in the English House of Commons
so far back as 1406, protested that he was altogether
too young for the position, and, being only about thirty-
one, lacked sense.
Sir Henry was only thirty-eight when elected,
but he lacked neither the sense nor the caution
associated with riper years.
He was born on the 12th of August, 1857. and
was the son of Jan Carel Juta, who came from Holland.
At the South African College, where he was educated,
he did well, passing, at the age of seventeen, eighth
on the list in the matriculation in the same year as
his predecessor, Sir David Tennant, was elected
Speaker. Two years later he took his degree and then
proceeded to London, where he took his LL.B. After
being admitted as a barrister to the Inner Temple
132 MR. SPEAKER JUT A.
and called to the Bar, he returned to Cape Town in
1880 and was admitted as an advocate of the Supreme
Court. He soon built up a big practice, and in 1893,
standing for Parliament, was elected a member of
the House of Assembly for Oudtshoorn. In the same
year he took silk and was appointed Attorney-General
in the second Rhodes Ministry.
He had thus had only three years' Parliamentary
experience when the resignation of Sir David Tennant
was read to the House on its meeting in 1896. He
had, however, acted as Judge of the High Court of
Griqualand West, and Sir Gordon Spngg, who was
then Prime Minister, had no hesitation in proposing
that he should become Speaker in Sir David's place.
Sir Gordon had delved deep into Parliamentary prece-
dents and told the House that both those renowned
Speakers, Onslow and Manners Sutton, were even
younger than the present candidate for the Chair
when they had been elected. There was, moreover,
this advantage, that if a young man was put in the
Chair he would be able to occupy the position
for many years and would thus gam the experience
it was so great an advantage to possess. His nominee
had a perfect knowledge of the two languages, and
it was to be hoped that he would have as long
a tenure of the Chair as had young Speaker Onslow.
W. P. Schreiner and Juta had been at school together,
and it was with great pleasure that the former was
THE FIRST RULING. 133
able to tell the House of his schoolfellow's merits.
He, too, however, felt that, coming after Sir David
(who was sixty-eight when he resigned), to be only
thirty-eight was to be a trifle young, but that, he
assured the House, was a defect which Time would
cure.
Mr. Juta thanked his proposer and seconder in
a few well-balanced sentences, and on being conducted
to the Chair, addressed the House once more in ac-
cordance with the time-honoured custom. In the
drawing-room of Government House His Excellency
the Governor, Sir Hercules Robinson, confirmed the
election, and Mr. Speaker Juta, debonair and alert,
returned to the House to receive its benediction at
the hands of Mr. Merriman and Mr. Theron.
That was on Thursday, the 30th of April, 1896,
and on the following day, before the Speaker had had
time to get accustomed to his wig or his conspicuous
position, he was called upon to give a ruling ! The
House had attended the opening ceremony in the
Legislative Council, and, having returned, was dis-
posing of some preliminary work when up sprang
two front-bench members of the Opposition and wanted
to know what on earth the House was doing : Mr.
Speaker was permitting matters to be dealt with before
the Governor's Speech had been communicated to
the House. From that moment the Speaker's wig
seemed to fit, and the Chair assumed the right pro-
134 MR. SPEAKER JUTA.
portions. ' It is in entire accordance with precedent,
remarked the newly-elected Speaker in almost a kindly
voice, " it is in entire accordance with precedent
for business of an informal nature to be disposed of
before Mr. Speaker communicates His Excellency's
speech," and once more the machinery of the House
was set in motion.
As Speaker he had a " short life, but a gay one."
Political feeling ran high, and questions of the day
were often discussed with the greatest acrimony ;
so, although he was not frequently called upon to
decide really knotty points, he had always to exercise
the greatest tact and vigilance. ' That is a deliberate
falsehood," or " That is a he " was often substituted
by members in the heat of the moment for the Par-
liamentary expression ' That is not true," and the
Speaker had to explain the difference as delicately
as he could. It is remarkable that in times such as
these the Speaker's ruling was never questioned,
but when a daring member did occasionally indulge
in a passage at arms with the Chair it was invariably
the Speaker that pinked his man.
Add to these circumstances the fact that there
was, in some quarters, a certain amount of feeling
against his election and it will be seen that it required
more than the ordinary qualifications to give satisfaction.
The unwritten rule that any member about to raise
a question^ for Mr. Speaker's decision should give
FORESIGHT. 135
the Chair due notice was often disregarded and points
were sprung upon the new occupant without warning.
But here again lunge was met by parry and counter
lunge. To guard himself against being unprepared
he would carefully go through the Order Paper for
the day and try to anticipate any points that might
be raised. These would be looked up and rulings
written with surprising success ; surprising to his
antagonists, for, with the quick eye of the duellist,
he frequently foresaw their methods of attack and
on one day alone was able to make use of three out
of four rulings he had prepared. And so, ever watchful,
ever alert and at all times courteous, he, by degrees,
won over his adversaries and came to be duly notified
of any points to be raised.
He was indifferent as to the person against whom
his decisions were directed, and in his first year greatly
delighted the Opposition by ruling that a notice of
motion placed at the head of the Order Paper by the
Prime Minister on a Government " Order Day '
was out of its place, and could not be taken until the
Orders of the Day had been disposed of. Both on
this occasion and in 1898, when Sir Gordon tried to
turn the tables on Mr. Schremer on a somewhat similar
matter, the Speaker considerably enlightened the
House as to its procedure. Members had often entered
the Debating Chamber primed to the hilt with knowledge
gleaned from the latest edition of ' May," only to
136 MR. SPEAKER JUT A.
find that they were wrong after all. This the Speaker
explained was due to the fact that the rule providing
that resort should be had to the usage and practice of
the Imperial Parliament was last adopted in 1883, and
that changes made in the Imperial Parliament after
that date did not affect the Cape House. The statement
may make dull reading now, as the Union rules accept
a later edition of " May " (the eleventh) as the standard
of reference, but to those who were interested in the
proceedings of the House at that time it was a matter
of the first importance.
His first year of office was largely bound up with
the Parliamentary enquiry into the Jameson Raid.
He was not only entrusted with the nomination of
the members of that historical Select Committee, but
was called upon to give two important rulings, affecting
the privilege of the House, which arose out of the
Committee's investigations.
The personnel of the Committee gave the greatest
satisfaction. It included several distinguished lawyers,
yet when only three meetings had been held they
found themselves in difficulties upon doubts being
raised as to whether the head of the Telegraph De-
partment could be called upon to produce telegrams
which had passed between Rhodes and others. The
Powers and Privileges of Parliament Act provided
generally that the House could order the production
of any documents, but the Telegraph Act stated specifi-
THE POWER OF PARLIAMENT. 137
cally that the contents of a telegram could be divulged
only before a Court of Justice. The sacred rights
of Parliament were at stake. What was to be done ?
The Speaker was asked to decide the point, and on
the 4th of June, 1896, he appeared personally before
the Select Committee. After exhaustively treating
the whole question of the production of papers before
a colonial legislature he ruled that in view of the specific
provision of the Telegraph Act it was not competent
for the Select Committee to demand the coveted
telegrams, and the end of the matter was that Parliament
had to show its supreme authority by passing a special
Act to invest the Select Committee with the requisite
power.
But before long there arose another question. Sir
David Tennant in 1883 had drawn the attention of
the House to the fact that it could not deal with matters
in which members themselves were not the culprits,
and at his instance Parliament had passed the Powers
and Privileges Act to invest itself with the desired
authority over those who were not members. Hence,
when on the 24th of June, 1896, a Cape Town newspaper
printed a paragraph in reference to the proceedings
of the Select Committee on the Jameson Raid, Sir
Henry did not let the offence pass unnoticed, but pointed
out that this was a breach of privilege now punishable
with fine or imprisonment, and hinted darkly at what
the House would do if it happened again.
138 MR. SPEAKER JUT A.
In those good days the House sat for only three
months in the year. A recess, however, has never been
the holiday it is popularly supposed to be. Questions
that have arisen as well as questions that may arise
have to be dealt with, and in order that he might not
be hampered by decisions that had been given in the
past, Mr. Speaker Juta improved the shining hour
by looking up, analysing and annotating all the rulings
given by Brand and Tennant, and by the time he had
completed his self-appointed task, members were once
more streaming into the building, and his second year
had begun.
The Opposition had become more powerful, and
on the 30th of April, 1897, tried a fall with Sprigg's
third Ministry. The motion over which members
came to grips was simply " that the Government does
not -possess the confidence of the House." All that
day and well into the night the House swayed back-
wards and forwards in fierce encounter, and at twenty
minutes to eleven, when the question had been put
and a division had taken place, Mr. Speaker informed
the House that the tussle had ended in a tie — thirty-
six were for the motion and thirty-six against, so, in
order to keep the question open, he gave his casting
vote against the motion in accordance with the usual
practice. The House then adjourned, and the Speaker,
who had kept one eye on the clock for some time,
hurried off to catch his train. To him the casting vote
CONGRATULATIONS. 139
had been a detail, but to Sir Gordon it meant a new
lease of life, and often afterwards his Government
was twitted with being the " Speaker's Ministry."
In the small list of Diamond Jubilee honours that
year the Speaker's name figured as one upon whom
Her Majesty had been pleased to confer a knighthood,
and the House immediately took the opportunity of
congratulating Sir Henry. The agreeable duty fell to
Sir James Sivewnght, the acting Prime Minister, and
Mr. Merriman, in a speech punctuated with cheers,
expressed the hearty concurrence of those who sat on
his side of the House. The speeches were short and to
the point, but had in them that spontaneity which
clearly indicated how genuine the feeling was. That
Sir Henry was much impressed with the confidence
and goodwill he had won in so short a time was manifest
from his reply, which left members under the impression
that after all their congratulations were perhaps the
greater honour of the two.
In comparison with his predecessors, Sir Henry
did not give many rulings— he was not long enough in
office — but all of them had that unmistakable ring of
simplicity which is the sign of clear judgment, and
there were several to which reference has frequently
been made by his successors. Particular attention was
paid to the principle that the House should not in any
way be deprived of its power over the purse. When,
for example, a customs convention with a tariff annexed
140 ME. SPEAKER JUT A.
was sought to be approved without due opportunity
being given to members to reduce or expunge items
in the tariff, Sir Henry refused to allow the rights of the
House to be so curtailed. It had, moreover, been a
growing practice of the Government to present
Estimates of Expenditure containing an item of, say,
£10,000, less £9,999 receipts, leaving only £1 to be
voted by the House, and Speaker Juta, holding that
this was unconstitutional as it deprived the House of
its power of reducing the £10,000 in any way it pleased,
gave notice to the Premier and the leader of the
Opposition that he could not allow the Estimates to
be presented in that form. He ceased to be Speaker
before he could give practical effect to his views, but
the means which he intended to adopt are given in his
evidence before the Select Committee on Public
Accounts in August, 1906, and a ruling based on his
evidence was delivered in the House in 1907.
These were legacies for which private members were
duly grateful, but their wives and the wives of members
to-day also owe a great deal to his protection. In Sir
David Tennant's time a Government House party had
occupied nearly all the principal seats at the spectacular,
if not highly exciting, opening ceremonies, but Sir
Henry held that the wives of men who were administering
and legislating for the country were just as much
entitled to recognition. After Sir Henry Juta had
decided upon the course to adopt, Lord de Villiers,
A GOVERNMENT DEFEAT. 141
then President of the Legislative Council, was struck
with the idea and arranged for an interview with the
Speaker and the Clerk of the House. That there should
be a change in the plan hitherto adopted was soon
agreed to. Permanent arrangements were made for future
ceremonies and the wives of members and prominent
officials lived happily ever after.
His third session, which terminated abruptly after a
few weeks, was his last. The Opposition again
challenged the Government by once more moving in
those simple but potent words : " That the Government
does not possess the confidence of the House." This
time the Speaker's casting vote was not required. The
motion was carried by forty-one votes to thirty-six,
and Sir Gordon Sprigg announced that, after he had
been granted enough money to carry on with, the
Governor would dissolve the House.
But Sir Gordon did not forget the services of the
Speaker, and before the dissolution he rose to record
in eulogistic terms how deeply sensible the House was of
the " able, fearless and impartial " manner in which
Sir Henry had performed his duties. Mr. Mernman,
Mr. Schremer, and Mr. Theron, following Sir Gordon,
showed how united the feeling was, and Sir Henry
" suitably replied." ' I know," he said, " that during
the last few years feeling has run very high, and 1
think there can be no greater honour which I can send
down to my posterity than that in spite of all the high
142 MR. SPEAKER JUT A.
feeling I still retain your confidence and esteem."
He went on to remind the House that at the general
elections about to take place he would have to fight
for his seat like the rest of them and might make remarks
that ought not to be made. Should this happen he
asked the House " to bear with him and regard it with
all softness, remembering the difficulties of the position,
and not in any way set down aught in malice but some-
thing extenuate, believing that as far as he could he would
always do the impartial duty of the Speaker."
Sir Henry, however, was not re-elected, and when
Parliament reassembled on the 7th of October, 1898,
a new Speaker had to be chosen. How Sir Henry once
more built up his extensive practice at the Bar ; how he
once more entered Parliament; and how, in 1914, he
was appointed Judge-President of the Cape Provincial
Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa and
Additional Judge of Appeal in the Appellate Division,
are matters which fall outside the scope of this sketch.
Suffice it to say that he has never lost the popularity
he won and held as the third Speaker of a critical
House.
IV.
The
Honourable
Sir Wm.
Bisset Berry,
Kt., M.A.,
M.D., LL.D.,
1898-1908.
HON. SIR WM. BISSET BERRY, Kt., MA
Speaker of the House of Assembly. 1898-1908.
i-'rom a photograph by Duffus, Cape Town
M.D. LL.D.
IV.
The Hon. Sir Wm. Bisset Berry,
Kt., M.A., M.D., LL.D.
1898-1908.
SIR BISSET BERRY looked and acted the part
of Speaker to perfection. No one could have
appeared more at ease in that imposing little
procession which daily wound its way from the Speaker's
Chambers, through lobby and corridor, to the Speaker's
Chair in the House of Assembly. First came the
Sergeant~at-Arms in court dress, bearing the glittering
mace which had known every procession and state
ceremony since the days when Brand was Speaker in
the Goede Hoop Lodge. Then came the Speaker
himself in grey wig and sombre gown, inclining his head
in stately fashion to members and officials on this side
and that. Bringing up the rear of the procession, also
bewigged and begowned, were the Clerk and Clerk-
Assistant, although the Clerk and the Speaker were
often to be seen walking side by side, earnestly discussing
some point of procedure. On one person at least who
witnessed this scene every day during the session an
impression has been made that time will not efface.
Even the smile that accompanied the Speaker's bow
146 MR. SPEAKER BERRY.
seemed to have about it just that old-world dignity
which distinguishes his high office from the common-
place.
Sir Bisset had not the advantage of being a lawyer,
but he had the highly trained mind of the scientist
perfected by lifelong study of men and books. So far
as books went every branch of literature was his special
delight, and his early proclivities had soon shown that
science was his forte. He was born in Aberdeen on
the 26th of July, 1839, and after attending the Grammar
School in that city proceeded to the Marischal College.
Having won several bursaries open to the sons of the
Guildry of the city he entered the Aberdeen University,
and graduated M.A. at the age of twenty and M.D.
two years later.
At about this time the Mail Company decided to
carry surgeons on their liners, and Dr. Berry was among
the first to be taken. His appointment was on the
Athens, which now lies a wreck on the Green Point
rocks, a victim of the great gale of 'sixty-five. A
year before the disaster, however, he decided to settle
in South Africa, married and obtaining an appointment
as District Surgeon in Queenstown, practised in that
neighbourhood with increasing success.
There being no railway to Queenstown in those
days, there were no visiting theatre companies, and the
inhabitants made up for the lack of amusement by
holding what they called public meetings. A hand-bell
A PUBLIC MEETING. 14;
was loudly rung and almost the whole town would
attend what usually turned out to be a very rowdy
entertainment. Shortly after his arrival Dr. Berry
was asked to take the chair at one of these meetings
and the result probably had a great deal to do with his
subsequent career. He had been president of his
college debating society, and, thanks to his past
experience, succeeded in turning what threatened to
be an unusually uproarious evening into one of com-
parative tranquillity. The new comer, who, in one
evening, had been able to raise the level of a form of
recreation which had existed for years, was regarded
with a curiosity that soon developed into appreciation
when it was found how great an interest he took in the
local government of the town.
By familiarising himself with South African problems
he came to be a recognised authority on education and
native affairs, but it was only after he had been in the
Colony for thirty years, and had been elected Mayor
of Queenstown, that he entered Parliamentary life by
being elected a member for the Queenstown constituency
in the general election of 1894.
Being elected Speaker in 1898 he had only four
years' experience as a private member, but, notwith-
standing an innate aversion to publicity, he had in less
than that time made his mark in the House. His services
were first sought on the subjects he had specialised in,
and afterwards in an ever widening circle. His speeches
148 MR. SPEAKER BERRY.
were eloquent, able and learned, and, having an incisive
delivery, he was always listened to with the greatest
attention. In the committee rooms, too, he had gained
distinction as Chairman of the Select Committees on
the Glen Grey Allotments, the Cape Town Municipal
Amendment Bill, and Agricultural Schools ; but four
years is after all a short time in which to acquaint
oneself thoroughly with the intricacies of Parliamentary
procedure, and until less than twenty-four hours of
his election he had no notion that he would be called
upon to adjudicate from the Chair upon questions
concerning the law and usage of a legislative assembly.
After the general election of 1898 it was arranged
between the Prime Minister (Sir Gordon Sprigg) and
the Opposition that the Government, which had been
returned in almost the same strength as the Opposition,
should nominate a member for the Speakership from
its own ranks. A caucus of the party was held the day
before the House met, and it is now an open secret that
when the Speakership was discussed only two names
were put forward. Dr. Berry arrived late, and learnt
with surprise that the choice lay between himself and
Mr. Hockly. It was left to the Cabinet to decide between
the two, and the same afternoon Dr. Berry was sent
for by the Prime Minister and asked whether he would
accept nomination on the morrow. By those who knew
the lucrative practice he had established on the eastern
frontier, it was realised that acceptance would mean
A DISABLING SPEECH. 149
a considerable financial sacrifice, but he yielded to
persuasion and decided to withdraw from practice if
elected.
And so when the House met on the following day
(7th of October, 1898), and members rushed to secure
seats for the session, Dr. Berry was not among their
number. Silent and expectant he sat the solitary occupant
of the Government cross-benches, until his proposer,
Sir Gordon Sprigg, and his seconder, Mr. Rose Innes,
conducted him to the Chair. Having made up his
mind he did not resist with physical force, as had been
the habit of bygone Speakers-elect in the English House
of Commons, but his reply was remarkably like the
" disabling speeches " which used to be the fashion in
those days. He lamented his short Parliamentary
experience, and deplored the fact that, being unaware
of what the future had in store for him, he had never
consciously endeavoured to acquire the gifts and graces
considered to be indispensable to a Speaker. It is
impossible to reproduce his eloquent periods here.
It is enough to say that, like the Speakers of yore, by
endeavouring to " deject and abase himself and his
deserts he had discovered and made known his worthiness
and sufficiency to discharge the place he was called to."
A few days after his election a motion of " no
confidence " in the Government was passed by a narrow
majority, and supporters of the defeated party grew
bitter in their anxiety to have Dr. Berry back among
MR. SPEAKER BEERY.
their ranks to strengthen their vote, but, whatever his
personal inclination may have been, it was quite clear
that it was as impossible for immortals to return to
live with mortals — as one of the newspapers put it — as
it was undesirable for a Speaker to play battledore and
shuttlecock with his exalted office.
In the Chair Dr. Berry showed the same character-
istics as he had in private life. In private he never
monopolised the conversation, and would only expound
when asked to do so. Although able to split hairs with
any schoolman, he would always lend an attentive ear
to the other view and keep an open mind until the last.
And so in the Chair, while still new to the position, he
would listen closely to arguments on points of order,
taking all in good part, and just when his would-be
coaches were beginning to think they had got it all
their own way, with an upward movement of his head
he would often deliver a ruling quite independent of
anything that had been advanced.
From the day of his election Mr. Speaker Berry
lived the life of an official recluse. In his Chambers
from an early hour in the morning he was ready at any
moment to place his services at the disposal of members
who found themselves in difficulties. Here, too, before
the House met, he would, like his predecessor, consider
questions which were likely to arise in the course of the
afternoon's proceedings, conferring with the Clerk on
intricate points and sending for Ministers when
151
necessary. Only once a year he would mix with members
on their own level, and that was when he entertained
them at the customary Speaker's dinner in the vestibule,
afterwards known as the Queen's Hall, where, soothed
by carefully selected music, they forgot the forum and
pledged their political foes.
At the close of the first year of his Speakership Dr.
Berry was called upon to perform a duty which is worth
recording, if only because it was connected with the
divinity that doth hedge — a Parliament : the powers and
privileges of the highest court.
It had come to the notice of the House that certain
wine merchants in Cape Town had attempted to bribe
a member. The case was fully established by a Select
Committee, and on being once more brought before
the House it was resolved that the Speaker should
reprimand the delinquents at the bar. Sir David
Tennant had once admonished a member, and so, less
formally, had Sir Chnstoffel Brand, but this was the
first time that the House had occasion to enforce its
authority outside its own walls.
Denison clearly distinguished a reprimand from an
admonition In his Diary he wrote that " in order to be
reprimanded a person at the bar must be in custody
of the Serjeant-at-Arms. When not in custody he
can only be admonished. When a person is at the bar,
and the Serjeant by his side with the mace, then no
member may speak, only the Speaker."
152 MR. SPEAKER BERRY.
This being a reprimand the Sergeant announced
when prayers had been read that the culprits were
present. A summons had been served on them and they
now waited without. " Let them be admitted," said the
Speaker, and the Sergeant, shouldering the mace, stalked
out. All eyes were fixed on the bar. The consuls, who
had mustered in full force, nearly tumbled out of the
gallery in their anxiety to see everything, and even
the Archbishop, who was wedged in among the
private secretaries, showed unmistakable signs of
curiosity.
It is remarkable what an unnerving effect the bar of
the House has. Even the sturdy Samuel Pepys tells
us in his diary that he had to fortify himself with a
half-pint of mulled sack and a dram of brandy before
he could face the ordeal, and the prisoners now at the
bar showed no sign of their previous hght-heartedness.
They — there were two of them — appeared alongside the
Sergeant with bowed heads. A member attempted to
speak, but was promptly suppressed. Then Mr. Speaker,
donning his low-crowned beaver hat, delivered a lecture
in well-chosen words on the enormity of their offence,
charitably assuming, however, that " neither did with
forethought and deliberation enter upon any device
corruptly to influence a member in his Parliamentary
duties." An attempt by the culprits to get in the last
word was instantly checked, and the incident was closed
by Mr. Speaker calling for petitions.
AN ALL-NIGHT SITTING. 153
Sir Bisset's term of office was crowded with dramatic
incidents. He had to hold the balance between parties
narrowly divided in numerical strength, to restrain
impetuosity, and at all times to preserve the dignity of
the House under trying circumstances ; but from a
Speaker's point of view his intervention in the Additional
Representation debate of 1904 was by far the most
important.
One memorable day towards the end of March,
1904, Dr. Jameson, the Prime Minister at that time,
hinted that it was the intention of the Government to
pass the second reading of the Additional Representation
Bill before the House rose, and it was soon plain that
there was going to be trouble. One member of the
Opposition frankly declared that if the Government
insisted on carrying the Bill by " a kind of martial law "
they on the other side would have to see what they
could make of the rules to hold up the House, while,
later in the evening, pointing a warning finger to the
windows facing the east, he foretold that honourable
members would still be sitting when the sunlight
streamed through. And so it happened, although many
members were not there to see it. Huddled together in
rooms adjoining the Debating Chamber, in the Library,
its galleries, and on every couch which offered rest,
they lay in uneasy slumber. Twice they leapt to their
feet at the harsh sound of the division bells, only to
find that the divisions were on motions for the adjourn-
154 ME. SPEAKER BERRY.
ment, and, muttering strange things, crept glumly back
to their uninviting beds.
When at last the rays of dawn did steal through
the windows, mingling oddly with the yellow glare of
the electric light, the House presented a weird spectacle.
Unshaven and unkempt Ministerialists who were not
snoring glared sullenly at the unrelenting features of
members opposite, and when the prophet of the previous
evening once more pointed to the windows and foretold
that the House would yet see the moon rise, their
despondency sank to the lowest depths. Meanwhile,
the Speaker, who had given some score of rulings on
minor points of order, had determined to take a step
unprecedented in the Cape Colony. Speaker Brand,
in the English House of Commons in 1881, had closured
a debate under much the same circumstances, and
Sir Bisset at 2.30 p.m., after the House had sat con-
tinuously for over twenty-four hours, " on his own
responsibility and to save the House from itself,"
decided to follow his example.
It is said that when Mr. Speaker Brand read his
decision to the House he trembled violently, and that his
hand shook to such an extent that he could hardly read
the ruling he had prepared. Sir Bisset, on the contrary,
remained calm and self-possessed. In his usual clear
voice he intimated that he clearly saw the duty that
lay before him. It was a duty, he said, that he owed
to Parliaments. ' I can only hope that the House will
CLOSURE. 155
absolve me from any endeavour to curtail its privileges
or to do anything that is not demanded of me. 1
proceed to put the question that this Bill be now read a
second time." The scene that followed can be better
imagined than described if one takes into account the
overwrought nerves of members, who had spoken for
hours on end. But the Speaker was adamant. The
Bill was read a second time and the House adjourned.
Some day more will be known about this affair, but for
the present one can only ask what would have happened
if the Speaker had not intervened ? Goodness only
knows. Had it not been that members were elected
for only five years perhaps the House would still be
sitting !
In contrast to this unpleasant situation there were
several agreeable occasions when the House paused in
its struggles to show its appreciation of the man who
saw there was fair play. In 1900, for instance, it took
great pleasure in congratulating Sir Bisset on his
knighthood, and in 1904, on his re-election to the Chair,
Dr. Jameson and Mr. Theron unreservedly praised
his actions in the past and the trouble he had taken to
acquaint himself more thoroughly with the taal ; while
at the end of the last session he presided over the House,
in 1907, the leaders of both parties united in expressing
their thanks for the services he had rendered Parliament.
Sir Bisset's replies, as might be expected, were extra-
ordinarily neat. Indeed, it seems impossible that they
156 MR. SPEAKER BERRY.
could have been anything else, for he possessed in a
high degree the qualifications which make the Speaker
" the first commoner in the land."
Harry Graham, in an interesting book, ^he Mother
of 'Parliaments, urges that an ideal Speaker should
combine intellectual ability with those qualities of
character which are the mark of what is called a
" gentleman." If anyone had these characteristics
Sir Bisset had. But he had others besides. He had a
habit of thought which never accepted half solutions
and a power of generalising that was more than serviceable
in interpreting the rules. Precedents that seemed to
conflict were analysed, combined and harmonised with
scientific precision and presented to the House in
language that revealed the mind of the litterateur.
His library in Queenstown being one of the finest
private collections of books in South Africa, his mind
was kept bright with reading, and his tastes being
catholic he was never liable to become one sided in his
views.
He sought re-election in 1908, but to the disappoint-
ment of his followers was not returned. At the 1910
and 1915 elections, however, he was more successful,
and was elected a member of the Union House of
Assembly by his old constituency.
V.
The
Honourable
Sir James
Molteno, Kt,
K.C., B.A.,
LL.B.,
1908-1910.
HON. SIR JAMES MOLTENO, Kt., K.C., B.A., LL.B
Speaker of the House of Assembly, 1908-1910
From a photograph by E. Peters (" Hood's Studio"), Cape Town.
V.
The Honourable Sir James Molteno,
Kt, K.C., B.A., LL.B.
1908-1910.
DESTINY could hardly have arranged a more
fitting tableau than that on which the curtain
was rung up during the last days of the Old
Cape House. When responsible government was granted
in 1872, Sir John Molteno, who had played a leading
part in the struggle for that form of government, was
appointed first Prime Minister, while his great friend,
Sir ChristofTel Brand, the first Speaker, still occupied
the Chair. In the closing scene, some four decades
later, Mr. Merriman, who had held office under Sir
John Molteno, figured as Prime Minister, while in the
Chair, holding the pulse of the expiring House, sat
Sir John's fourth son.
The Molteno family is almost as old as the Italian
hills it came from. An ancient chronicler, quoted in
T?he Life and ^imes of Sir John Charles Molteno.
thus explains the origin of the name : ' The noble
160 MR. SPEAKER MOLTENO.
signers, after the destruction of Milan by Uraja, who
had retired among the surrounding villas, seeing the
danger of their situation, turned to Milan, and, that they
might be distinguished family from family, preserved,
every one of them, as a distinctive name, the name of the
district or villa from whence they came. And in this
manner many of the Milanese families had their origin
from the Brianza : such names are the Pirovano, the
Brevio, the Osnago . . . the Molteno ... all noble
families whose names occur in our most ancient charters
and historical documents, and all now extant."
James Tennant Molteno was born at Claremont,
in the Cape Peninsula, on the 5th of January, 1865. He
was educated at the Diocesan College, Rondebosch,
and after graduating with " honours " in literature and
philosophy, he proceeded to Trinity College, Cambridge,
where he again graduated. After going through his
legal course, he was called to the Bar, and shortly
afterwards, at the age of twenty-six, took his seat in the
House as member for Namaqualand. Sir David Tennant
was Speaker, and under his tutorage the young member
learnt much that was to help him in later years, but,
being returned to Parliament without a break until he
himself was elected Speaker on the 22nd of April,
1908, he also owed a great deal to his more immediate
predecessors in the Chair.
The actual " Chair," by the way, to which Sir
James was conducted on his election as Speaker was by
1854- -1867
1868- 1884
1885"- 1910
THE SPEAKERS' CHAIRS, 1854 1910
THE SPEAKERS' CHAIRS. 161
no means the same as that occupied by Sir Christoffel
Brand. The well-padded Chair in which Sir James
reclined (and in which he afterwards sat for five years
as the first Speaker of the Union House of Assembly)
did not exist in those days. There were altogether
three Chairs occupied by the Cape Speakers. The first-
unpretentious but not uncomfortable — was one of those
old Dutch armchairs that curio-hunters nowadays seek
so eagerly. In the Goede Hoop Lodge it was raised
on a small platform with a screen behind it of a green
watered silk surmounted by Her Majesty s coat of arms,
and a small desk in front of it covered with green baize.
It had a cane seat, provided with a horse-hair cushion,
and at present, with one leg rather rickety, but otherwise
sound, leads a life of seclusion in Mr. Speaker's Library.
The next was installed in the Goede Hoop Lodge in
1868. This was much more elaborate ; but when the
House moved into the new buildings in 1885 it was
discarded for the one now in the LInion House, and
after years of idleness was placed in the Conference
Room upstairs.
But to return to the occupant. On being withdrawn
from the political fray, Sir James, himself a skilled
debater with a ready wit, must have found some
difficulty at first in repressing the quips and sallies with
which he had for so long amused the House, but in his
new role one could hardly perceive the same person,
so completely did he sink his former self. As a young
162 MR. SPEAKER MOLTESO.
member he had been an adept at starting hares, while
in "drawing members" — a game he began a year
after he had been returned to Parliament — he had few
equals. A favourite ruse of his had been to intervene
in a heated discussion and, with a great show of serious
concern for the personal honour of the combatants, to
make things livelier than ever by setting one member
against the other on a new issue.
On his election to the Chair, all this ringcraft was
abandoned, or at all events used only to detect the
devices of others. In the Chair he was as solemn as
the proverbial judge. " Order, order," he once
exclaimed when in the course of a debate a member
burst out laughing at a joke whispered to him by his
next-door neighbour, " the honourable member must
endeavour to restrain himself." He could not and
would not countenance undue levity, yet rumour has it
that when the member he had rebuked passed the Chair
on his way out of the House the Speaker leant over and
remarked, solto coce, ' You might tell me the joke
afterwards ! " But rumour is a lying jade.
Owing to the rapid march of events towards
unification, the storms the House had recently passed
through had abated, but it must not be supposed
that the last occupant of the Chair during his
somewhat brief tenure had merely to supervise a daily
routine.
Many of the trials and tribulations which make
A 8CEXE. KM
the life of a Speaker anything but an easy one were
still present, and in comparing the difficulties that beset
the path of the Cape Speakers it should not be forgotten
that the House at this time consisted of a hundred and
seven members, while when Sir ChristofTel Brand was
elected there were only forty-six. This number had
been increased to sixty-six when Sir David Tennant
was elected, to seventy-nine when Sir Henry Juta was
elected, and to ninety when Sir Bisset Berry was
elected ; so that the last Speaker had more than twice
as many members to control as the first — a factor
that naturally added to the responsibilities of the
Chair.
Moreover, the calm that followed the storms of
the previous Parliaments was more or less superficial.
The House, to change the metaphor, was carrying on
its work on the crust of a volcano. Ominous rumblings
were sometimes heard, and in 1909, Sir James' second
year, there was an eruption which rivalled the scene
that took place on the Additional Representation
Bill
The circumstances, in fact, were almost identical.
A debate on the Light Wine Licences Bill had con-
tinued for some days, and was likely to continue in-
definitely, so for the first and only time in the annals
of the Cape Parliament Mr. Speaker decided to apply
the closure rule the House of Commons had adopted in
1882. Apparently none of the members were aware
164 MR. SPEAKER MOLTENO.
that such a rule existed. It was read and applied at
ten o'clock in the evening of the 15th of November,
1909, and for fully five minutes thereafter the House
was a pandemonium. Loud cries of " Order, order ! "
from the Government supporters were drowned in
fierce cheers and counter-cheers. The front bench
of the Opposition were on their feet in a twinkling,
but could at first find no words to express their feelings.
When at last the leader of the Opposition obtained
Mr. Speaker's permission to ask whether there was
" any remedy," Mr. Speaker must have felt inclined
to rule, as Mr. Lowther once did, " that the honour-
able member must not look at Mr. Speaker like that."
But, having never been addicted to half measures,
his answer was much more direct. ' It is a very simple
matter," he replied, " you have no remedy ; the
Speaker is the ultimate judge of this rule. I now put
the question that the Speaker leave the Chair." The
" Ayes " had it, and the Speaker vanished through the
swing door behind the dais.
This was the last ordinary session of the Cape
House, and at its close the Prime Minister, seconded
by the leader of the Opposition, moved a vote of thanks,
which included the hope that it would not be the last
time the Speaker would preside over the deliberations
of Parliament in South Africa.
Parliament was summoned to meet once more on
the 9th of April, 1910, but its business was as formal
_ THK END Oh' THK rROCKMIOX. 165
as it was pleasant. It had met to repeal the Civil
Servants Retrenchment Act, and after sitting for only
an hour and a quarter — a record session — it adjourned
never to meet again.
With Sir James ended the procession of Cape
Speakers. Could the veil of time be drawn aside, and
the years which separated their terms of office fade
away as in a magic crystal, what an arresting procession
it would be ! Sir Christoffel Brand, small only so far
as inches count, with hands clasped behind his back,
would pass before us with short, firm step ; Sir David
Tennant, bland and imperturbable, would follow with
unaffected dignity ; Sir Henry Juta, with head thrown
well back, would seem to be welcoming a challenge
on a point of order ; while Sir Bisset Berry, like some
scholar of the Renaissance, would half turn his shoulders
to incline his head in courtly recognition, and Sir James
Molteno, seeing before him the august men whose repu-
tation he was upholding, would appear bolder and
more self-reliant than ever.
A small procession, it is true, but one which, by
its very smallness, was a credit to the House which,
during its fifty-six years of existence, ever took the
Mother of Parliaments for its guide. For at Westminster
no principle in late years has been more strictly
observed than the continuity of Speakership : the
re-election in a new Parliament of the last occupant
of the Chair. Sir Christoffel Brand and Sir David
i66
MR. til'EAKER MOLTENO.
Tennant resigned after long service. Sir Henry Juta
and Sir Bisset Berry were, unfortunately, absent when
the roll of newly elected members was read by the
Clerk, and Sir James Molteno ceased to hold office
when the Union Constitution came into force on the
31st of May, 1910.
Annexures.
ANNEXURE A.
EXECUTIVE COUNCILLORS WITH SEATS IN PARLIA
MENT DURING PERIOD OF REPRESENTATIVE
GOVERNMENT, 1854-187?.
Under § 79 of the Constitution Ordinance, 1852, (he undermentioned officers
weie entitled to sit and to speak in bo'h Houses of Parliament. They had no
votes and were debarred hy §§ 33 and 47 from being elected members of either
House.
Office and Name. From I n Cause of Chanrr.
COLONIAL SECRETARIES :
SirRawsonW.Rawson, 9 May, 1854 21 July. 1864 Promoted Governor of
K.C.M.G., C.B. Bahamas.
Sir Richard Southey, 22 July, 1864 30 Nov., 1872 Retired on introduction of
K.C.M.G. Responsible Government.
ATTORNEYS-GENERAI :
W. Porter, CMC. 16 Sept., 1839 17 Mar., 1866 Retired at age of sixty on
full pension.
W. D. Griffith .. 18 Mar., 1866 30 Nov. .1872 Retired on introduction of
Responsible Government.
TREASURERS :
H. Rivers .. .. 21 June, 1842 6 Dec., 1861 Died.
Sir Richard Southey, 6 Dec., 1861 21Ji.lv, 1864 Promoted Colonial Secre-
K.C.M.G. tarv.
J. C Davidson . . 28 Nov , 1864 30 Nov., 1872 Retired OP introduction of
Responsible ( jovernment.
AUDITORS :
W.Hope .. .. 1 Sept. ,1849 3 Oct. ,1858 D.e<l
E. M. G'le .. .. 19 Apr. ,1859 19 July, 1875* Retired at ace of <,xt\ -four
* After the passing of the " Responsible Government Act, 1872, the Auditor had
no seat in Pailiament and was not eligible for election as a member of either House of
Parliament.
I hO
ANNEXURE B.
MINISTRIES DURING PERIOD OF RESPONSIBLE
GOVERNMENT, 1872-1910.
Under § 3 of Act No 1 of 1872 ("Responsible Government " Act) Ministers
were made eligible for election as members of either House of Parliament. If not so
elected they could not, under § 5, sit or speak in either House. If elected they
had the right, under § 4, to sit and speak in both Houses but could vote only in
the House of which they were members.
I. MOLTENO MINISTRY.
(1 DEC.. 1872-5 FFB., 1878.)
Office.
Name.
Premier and Colonial Secretary '*J. C. Molteno . .
Treasurer of the Colony . . tH. White
f';*J. H. deVilliers
Attorneys-General . . ;*S. Jacobs
' !*A. Stockenstrom
Commissioners of Crown \ *C. Aberc. Smith
Lands and Public Works / ,*J. X. Merriman
Secretary for Native Affairs . . *C. Brownlee
Circumstances and proximate cause of change.
During recess.
Dismissed by Governor owing to policy pur-
sued in regard to use of Imperial troops and
control of Colonial forces.
No appeal to country.
II. SPRIGG MINISTRY (FIRST.)
(6 Frn.. 1878—8 MAY, 1881 )
Name. Circumstances and proximate cause of changf
Premier and Colonial Secretary
Treasurers of the Colonv
Commissioner of Crown Lands
and Pubhc Works.
Secretary for Native Affairs . .
Minister without portfolio
*J. Gordon Sprigg During session.
+J. Miller .. Native administration including disarmament
*H. W. Pearson of Basutos. Attorney-General disagreed
*Thos. Upington with native policy and left ministry with bare
*! W Leonard maionty. Spngg, unable to meet demands
*J. Lain<; .. lor Kimberley Railway, would not face
proposed motion of no confidence l>v
*\X . Avliff . . Scanlen and resigned.
+ j. Miller . . No appeal to country.
Member of the House ol
Member of the Legislati
Assembly.
e Council.
CAPI-] MINISTRIES. 171
III. SCANLEN MINISTRY.
(9 MAY, 1881 — 12 MAY. 1884)
Office. Name. Circumstances and proximate cause of change.
Premier and Attorney-General *+T. C. Scanlen . . During session following general election.
\ *J. C. Molteno .. Ostensibly on account of defeat by thirty-seven
Colonial Secretaries . . / *T. C. Scanlen votes on motion for repeal of proclamation
\ tC. W. Hutton . . on phylloxera but defeat was inevitable on
Treasurers of the Colony I *C. J. Rhodes . . pending motion by Scanlen which proposed
... r I \ * F. C. Scanlen .. to cede portions of Transkeian Territories
Attorneys-*-jeneral .. , *i w i i i • i r
i J. w. Leonard .. to Imperial Uovernment.
Commissioner of Crown Lands *J. X. Mernman No appeal to country.
and Public Works.
Secretary for Native Affairs . . *J W. Saner
Minister without portfolio .. * |. H. Hofmcvr
IV. L'PINGTON MINISTRY.
(13 MAY. 1884-2-4 Nov., 1886.)
Office. Name. Circumstances and proximate cause of change.
Premier and Attorney-General *Thos. Upington During recess.
„ . . . c . \ *[. AylifT .. Sprigs, the Treasurer, took Lpingtons place
/ *).Tudhope .. as' Premier and Upington became Attorney-
Treasurer of the Colony .. *J. Gordon Sprigg General only. On being formally questioned
Commissioner of Crown Lands *F Schermbrucker Sprigg declined to give reasons for chan«e.
and Public Works. but Upington afterwards stated that i!
Secretary for Native AfTnirs .. *J. A. de Wet .. made on account of his ill-health.
i No appeal to -.-rvintry.
V. SPRIGG MINISTRY (SECONDS
(25 Nov.. 1886—16 Jn.Y. 1890.)
Office. Name. Circumstances and proximate cause ;
. ope ..
Colonial Secretaries .. / *H. \V. Pearson pounds for railway construction
Attorney-General .. . . *Thos. I'pinsrton No appeal to countr\ .
Commissioner of Crown Lands §P . Schermbrucker
and Public Works.
Secretary for Native Affivrs . . *J. A. de Wet
172
ANNEXUEE B.
VI. RHODES MINISTRY (FIRST)
. (17 JULY, 1890-3 MAY, 1893.)
Office.
Na
Circumstances and proximate cause of change.
Premier . . . . . . *Cecil J. Rhodes
Colonial Secretary . . . . *J. W. Sauer
Treasurer of the Colony . . *J X. Mernman
Attorney-General . . . . *J. Rose Innes .
Commissioners of Crown \ *Cecil J. Rhodes
. Lands and Public Works ' '*J. Sivewright .
Secretary for Native Affairs . . *P. H. Faure
During recess.
Change of ministers owing to cabinet dis-
agreement on granting of Railway refresh-
ment contract to J. D. Logan.
No appeal to country.
VII. RHODES MINISTRY (SECONDl
(4 MAY, 1893—12 JAN., 1896.)
Office.
Na
Circumstances and proximate cause of change.
During recess.
Jameson Raid. Rhodes resigned, and his
Premier *Cccil J. Rhodes
Colonial Secretan . . . . *P. H. Faure
Treasurer . . . . . . *J. Gordon Sprigg Treasurer, Sprigg, formed a ministry.
i *W. P. Schreiner No appeal to country
Attorneys-General . . *H. H. Juta
' *W. P. Schreiner
Commissioner cl Public \( orks *J. Laing
Secretary for Native Affairs *J. Frost
Secretary for Agriculture . . *J. Frost
VIII. SPRIGG MINISTRY (THIRD).
(13 JAN., 1896—13 OCT , 18%.)
Office.
Premier and Treasurer
Colonial Secretaries . .
Attorneys-General
Name. , Circumstances and proximate cause of change.
/ *T W. Smartt
\ *T. Upington
' tT. L. Graham
Commissioner of Public Works *J. Sivewright
Secretary for Agriculture *P. H. Faure
J. Gordon Spngg j During session following genera! election
T. Te Water . . Motion of no confidence by Schreiner carried
by forty-one vctes to thirty-six.
No appeal to country, but in previous session
Sprigg had been defeated on a motion ot
no-confidence and had then appealed to
country.
* Member of the House of Assembly.
t Member of the Legislative Council.
CAPE MINISTRIES.
173
Offic
IX. SCHREINER MINISTRY.
(14 OCT., I89R-17 JI-NF. 1900.}
Nam
Circumstances and proximate cause of change.
Premier and Colonial Secrdar\ *W. P. Schreiner During recess.
Treasurer . . . . . . *J. X. Mernman Cabinet disagreement on compensation (or
Attorney-General . . . . *R. Solomon . . \var losses and punishment of those engaeed
Commissioner of Public Work* *J. W. Sauer . . in rebellion.
Secretary for Agriculture . . tA. .1. Herholdt . . No appeal to country.
Minister without portfolio . . *T. Te Water
X. SPRIGG MINISTRY (FOURTH).
(18 JUNE. 1900-21 FFB . 1904.)
Office
Na
Circumstances and proximate cause of change.
Premier and I reasurer
Colonial Secretaries . .
Attorneys-General
Commissioners of PuHic
Works
Secretaries for Agriculture
Minister without portfolio
*J. Gordon Sprigg During recess following general election.
:tT. L. Graham . . Defeat by ten votes on motion by Burton
*A. Douglass . . for revision of martial law sentence*.
*P. H. Taure . . (By not supporting movement for sns-
*J. Rose Innes . . pension of constitution Spnge had
*T. L. Graham . . previously been left in minority and
*T. W. Smartt .. had to rely alternately on Bond an 1
*A. Douglass Progressive support.)
*P. H. Faure . . Appeal to country (without obtaining supplies)
*.'. Frost . . i a few days before expiration of House of
*J. Frost . . j Assembly by effluxion of time.
Office.
XI. JAMESON MINISTRY.
(22 FEB., 1904-2 FEB.. 190*.)
Circumstances and proximate cause of chan?t
Premier . . . . . . *L. S. Jameson . .
r i • i c . • ( *C. P. Crewe
Lolomal oecretane? *n i , ,-
' P. H. f-aure
Treasurer . . . . . . *F. H. Walton . .
Attorney-Genera! . . . . *\ ictor Sampson
Commissioner of Public \\ or's's *T. \V . Smartt ..
f A • ,, » *A. I. Fuller ..
secretaries tor Agriculture l *p p /->
... . • , ,,. > *L L. Michcil '.
.Ministers without portfolio ( f . , ,r ,j f
During recess following general election.
Deadlock in Legislative Council in Coi
mittee of Supply on Fstimates.
Appral to countrv
Member of t!-c House of AsseinbK
Member ol the Legislative Council.
ANNEXURE B.
XII MERRIMAN MINISTRY.
(3 FFB., 1908-30 MAY, !9IO.)
Office. Name Circumstances and proximate cause of chanse.
Premier and Treasurer . . *J. X. Mernman
Colonial Secretary . . . . *N. F. de Waal . . During recess.
Attorney-General .. .. *H. Burton .. The 31st May, 1910, was fixed by Royal
Commissioner of Public Works *J. W. Sauer .. proclamation as date of Union.
Secretary for Agriculture . . *F. S. Malan
.... ff ,. (' fD.P.deV.Graaff
Ministers without portfolio f *TJ i ^
* Member ot the House of Assembly.
* Member of the Legislative Council
ANNEXURE C.
MEMBERS' LENGTH OF SERVICE.
During the 56 years' existence of the Cape House of Assembly (1854- 1910)
there were altogether 560 members. Their average service in the House was srven
years. The following members sat for more than 20 years :
Yeirs
First
1 ,ast :
Constituencies
in
Session.
Session.
Hou- t
i
Merriman.Rt. Hon. J. X.
1869
'910
Aliual North, Work-house, ..
42* i
Namaqualand, \ ictoria \\ ( !
Sauer, Hon. J. \V.
1874
1910
Aliwal North, (Jcorer
36
Sprigg. Rt. Hon. Sir J.C..
1869
1910
East London . .
36
Frost, Hon. Sir J.
1874
1907
Queenstown
34*
Proctor, J. j
1857
1888
Paarl
32*
Tennant, Hon. Sir D. ..
1866
1895
Piquetbere .
30*
Molteno, Hon. Sir J C.
1854
1883
Beaufort West & Victoria \VcM
29
Solomon, S.
1854
1883
Cape 1 own
29
Manuel, C J.
1859
1888
Cape Division . .
29
Brabant, Sir E. Y.
1873
1907
East London . .
28
Hockly, W. H
1869
1903
Somerset East & f'ort Beaufort
27
Lamp, Hon. J. . .
1874
1903
Fort Beaufort . .
27
Marais, IS.
1874
1900
Paarl .. .. ..
27*
Warren, 'Col. W. J. .
1884
1910
Kmc William s 1 own
26
Scanlen, Hon. Sir T. C.
1870
1895
Cradock
26*
Theron, T. P. . .
1884
1908
Richmond
25*
Keyter, B. 1. .
1866
1892
Oudtshoorn . .
24
Ayliff, Hon.' W.
1864
1888
f'ort Beaufort . .
23
Louw, M. J
1859
1886
Cape Town iv Cape Disti'K t ..
23
Pearson, Hon. H. W. .
1870
1898
Port Elizabeth
23
Brand, Hon. Sir C.J. ..
1854
1875
Stellenbosch
77*
Fuller, Sir T. E . '
1879
1900
Cape Town
•>->*
Barn, T. D
1869
1890
Riversdale
77*
Du Plessis, A. S.
1889
1910
Albert . .
•>-)*
V'intcent, L. A.
1874
1894
Gcoree . .
Y\*
Rhodes, Rt Hon. C.J.
1881
1900
Barkly West . .
21*
De Wet, Hon. J. A. ..
1869
1889
Somerset East . .
2!*
Joubert, J.
1880
1900
Albert ..
21*
* Unbroken service.
A Fifty years, including service m Union House up to 1918.
* The year 1901, in which there was no session, has not been (leJuct- !
ANNEXURE D.*
ADDITIONAL REPRESENTATION ACTS.
In 1910 the House of Assembly consisted of 107 members. The following
table shows the increase of members since the establishment of Parliament, giving
the .^ct, the name of the electoral division, and the number of members added: —
Constitution Ordinance
Act 3 of 1865—
Aliwal Noilh . .
Namaqualand
Oudtshoorn
Piquetberg
Queenstown . .
Richmond
Riversdale
Victoria Wtst . .
King Williams to-.Mi
East London
Act 7 of 1872—
Wodehousp
Vt 39 of 1877-
Kimberley
Bark'.v ". .
Act 13 otl 882—
Knnberley
An 30 of 1887—
Tembuland
Gnqualand lias!
Ac; 41 of 1895-
Yryhurt: . .
Mafeking
'»ct 19 of 1898—
Cathcart
Humansdorp . .
Carried forwarc
79
Brought forward
Act 19 of 1898 (continued.}
Middelbur?
Prieska
Simo-.stown
Jansenville
Woodstock
Wynberg
Cape Town
George
Griqualand East
Tembuland
Worcester
Por* Elizabeth . .
Act 5 of 1904—
East London
George . ,
Kingwilliamstown . .
Pa rl
Oudishoorn
Port EH/aberh .
Oueenstown
Uitenhage
Woodstock
Wynberg
Cape Town
Tola
79
The actual number was forty-six, but tins inc'uded two members for the Cape
Division. By the ooeiation of Att 19 ot 1898 this electoral division erased to exist,
rnc member !>?mg allotted to Wynberg and the other to Woodstock.
* Reprinted from the " Cape Civil Service List.
ANNEXURE E .*
ACTS
EXTENDING, AMENDING OR DEFINING
THE CONSTITUTION ORDINANCE. !852.
Freedom of Speech and Debate Act . . ... . . No. I of 1854.
To secure freedom of speech and debates or proceedings
in Parliament, and to «ive summary protection to persons
employed in th? publication of Parliamentary paper0 .
Registration of Voters Act N->. 1 6 of 1856.
To amend the law relative to the registration ot voters and
to the taking of polls
Corrupt Practices Prevention Act .. .. .. N-J. 21 of 1859.
To prevent bribery, treaunp, and undue influence at rie-'tions
of members of Parliament.
British Kaffrana Incorporation and Parliamentary
Representation Amendment Act . . . . N;>. 3 of 1865
To make provision for the incorporation of British KafTrana
with the Colony of the Cape of Good I~sope in two electoral
divisions, [King William's Town and Eist London], each
of which divisions is to be ent'tleo to send two n, embers
to the House of Assembly and foi the purposes of repre-
sentation in the Legislative Council to be comprised in
the Eastern Districts ; also to establish the following
electoral divisions, each to return two members to the
House of Assemblv, viz., Aliwal North. Namaqualand,
Oudtshoorn, Piquetbersr, Qucenstown, Richmond, Rivers-
dale and Victoria Wft.
Constitution Ordinance Amendment Act [Responsible
Government] . . . . .... . . . . No. 1 of 1872
To establish the offices ct Con-.tnissicner of Crown Lands
ind Public Works and of Secretary for N.itue .Affairs ; to
render all Ministers eligible for election as members ol
Parliament, and to fix their salaries.
^odehouse Representation Act. . . . . . . . No. 7 of 1
To constitute the fiscal division H Wodehouse an electoral
division entitled to elect two members of t':e House t_f
Aisemblv.
Reorinted from the '' Cape Civil Service List.
AXXEXURE E.
Election Law Amendment Act No. 14 of 1874.
To amend the law relating to the registration and qualification
of voters, and to the election of members of Parliament.
Constitution Ordinance Amendment Act .. .. No. 18 of 1874.
To repeal Act No 6 of 1859, and to amend the Constitution
Ordinance and Act No. 3 of 1865 by dividing the Colony
into seven electoral provinces for the election of members
of the Legislative Council, each province to return three
members ; to render vacant the seat of any members of
Parliament accepting offices of profit under Government,
except the office of a Minister of the Crown, or becoming
insolvent, and to make provision for vacancies occurring in
the interval between a general election and the then next
meeting of Parliament.
Griqualand West Annexation Act No. 39 of 1877.
To make provision for the annexation to the Colony of
the province of Griqualand West, returning one member
to the Legislative Council ; and for the purposes of repre-
sentation in the House of Assembly to be divided into two
electoral divisions [Kimberley and Barkly], each division
returning two member".
Payment of Members' Expenses Act .. .. .. No. 6 of 1879.
To increase the number of days for which members are
entitled to an allowance, under Section ninety of the Con-
stitution Ordinance, Irom fifty to ninety.
Ministers' Salaries Act No. 32 of 1879.
To increase the salaries payable to the five Ministers of the
Crown to £1,500 per annum each, and an additional sum of
£250 per annum to the Prime Minister. [By Act No. 2 of
1886 the salary of the Attorney-General was reduced to
£1 ,000 p.a., and the salaries of the other Ministers to £1 ,200 ;
this continued in force from the 1st July, 1886, to the 30th
June, 1887, when it w-s repeale 1 by Act No 28 01 1887.]
Constitution Ordinance Amendment Act . . . . No. ! of 1882.
To authorise the use of the Dutch language in debates and
discussions in Parliament.
Kimherley Increased Representation Act . . . . No. 13 of 1882.
To amend Act No. 39, 1877, by increasing the members for
th" electoral dnision of Kimberley from two to four.
President of Council Allowance Act . . . . . . No. 36 of 1882.
To remove doubts as to the legality of the payment of an
annual allowance to the Chief Justice as President of the
Legislative Council.
Telegraphic Messages Act (§3) No. 41 of 1882.
To authorise a member of Parliament to transmit hi?
resignation by telegraph.
Interpretation Act No. 5 of 1883.
To interpret and shorten the language of Acts of Parhamen'
ACTK AMEXDIXd ( '()\ST/Tl'T/O\ .
Parliamentary Election Act .. No. 9 of 1883.
To amend the la»vs relating to election petitions and to the
prevention of corrupt practices at Parliamentary elections.
Powers and Privileges of Parliament Act .. .. No. 1 3 of 1883.
To define and declare the powers and privileges of Parliament
and to amend the Audit Act of 1875 by substituting a
Speaker's audit of tl.e House of Assembly accounts.
Public Bodies' Private Bill Act. . . . No. 35 of 1885.
To authorise certain public bodies to introduce, prom<>le, or
oppose certain private bills, and to legalise expenses so
incurred.
Parliamentary Costs Taxation Act .. .. .. No. 6 of IR87.
To provide for tin- taxation of Cost of Private Bill? in Parlia-
ment.
Parliamentary Voters' Registration Act .. No. 1 4 of 1887.
To make better provision for the registration ol persons en-
titled to the electoral franchise under the Constitution
Ordinance.
Transkeian Territories Representation Act .. No. 30 ol 1887.
To create and define the electoral divisions of I embuland
and Gnqualand East, each to return one member to the
House of Assembly ; also to include the 1 ranskeian Terri-
tories, for representation in the Legislative Counc:!, in
the Eastern Electoral Province.
Native Registered Voters Relief Act .. .. No. 39 of 1887.
To exempt native registered voters from the operation of
certain disqualifying Acts of Parliament.
Members of Parliament Allowance Act . . No. 1 6 of 1888
To amend the !a\v in regard to the ["ravelling and Personal
Expenses of Members.
Audit Act Amendment Act (§§12 and 15) . . . . No. 32 of 1888
To place audit of joint Parliamentary Expenses under
Section 16 of Act 13 of 1883 ; also to authorise i^ue of
money on Speaker's requisi'mns
Oaths and Declarations Act (§§4 and 5) .. .. No. 18 of 1891.
To amend the Oath of Allegiance required to be taken
under the 61st Section o! the Constitution Ordinance.
Franchise and Ballot Act .. No. 9 of 1892.
To amend the Law \sith regard to the Qualifica'ion of \ otcr?
for Members of Parliament, and to make pro\ision for
taking Vr>tes by Ballot M Parliamentary. l"le<Jinns
Minister of Agriculture Act .. ^ No. 14 of
To create the office of a Minister of Agriculture, to abolish
the office of Secretary tor Naliv.- Atbirs. air! to jrnend the
designation of and provide for the assignment »{ duties
to certain Ministerial officers.
i8o ANNEXURE E.
Cumulative Vote Abolition Act (Cape Town) .. No. 16 of 1893.
To abolish the cumulative vote at House of Assembly
elections, Cape Town.
Glen Gray Act . . No. 25 of 1894.
Part III. To revise voters lists.
British Bechuanaland Annexation Act .. .. No. 41 of 1895.
To annex the territory, and to provide for one member of
the Legislative Council, and three members of the House
of Assembly, viz. : Vryburg 2, Mafeking 1.
Legislative Council Dissolution Act .. .. .. No. 9 of 1897.
To empower the Governor to dissolve the existing Legisla-
tive Council, without dissolving the House cf Assembly,
after the 31st December, 1897.
Parliamentary Representation Act . . . . . . No. 19 of 1898.
To add sixteen members to the House of Assembly.
Registration of Pailiamentary Voters Amendment Act No. 48 of 1899.
To amend the law relating to the registration oi Parlia-
mentarv Voters.
Illegal Practices Prevention Act No. 26 of 1902.
To amend the Corrupt Practices at Elections Prevention
Act, 1859," and the Parliamentary Elections Act, 1885.
Additional Parliamentary Representation Act. . . . No. 5 of 1904.
To add three members to tlie Legislative Council, and
twelve to the House of Assembly.
Private Bill Documents Deposit Act No. 3 of 190^
To provide for Depositories for Private Bill Documents
required to be deposited in accordance with the Standing
Rules and Orders of either House of Parliament.
ANNEXURE F.
DURATION OF-' SESSIONS.
1 he following table indicates the duration of sessions of Parliament and
the number of days on which the House of Assembly and legislative Council
sat in each session : —
|
Duration Number of Sittings. Duration Number o» Sitting.
Year. ] ol Session Ycnr. •>( Session -
in(la>s- Assomhlv. Guincil.i '" (!iivs' ..Wm!>K . G.ir-r.l.
1854
89
64
46
i883
<>4
64
36
1855
85
55
56
1884
H5
54
29
1856
84
57
56
IH85
92
64
36
1857
84
59
57
1886
79
51
32
1858
88
62
44
1887
72
49
27
1859
115
78
59
1888
89
63
36
I860
82
57
44
1888*
3
7
7
1861
1 1 1
74
65
1889
H6
59
31
1862
106
65
44
1890
84
56
28
1863
104
59
45
1891
85
61
37
1864
9!
64
53
1892
88
61
38
1865
167
91
80
1893
86
61
3^
1866
129
82
70
1894
94
69
45
1867
126
71
56
1895
94
64
43
1868
!06
' 62
51
1896
92
62
40
1869
118
76
49
1897
85
54
38
1870
!02
73
43
1898
39
25
17
1871
107
64
33
1898
78
53
V~,
1872
105
69
44
1899
91
64
5f>
1873
64
'43
31
1900
SS
61
31
1874
66
46
29
l°02
87
61
37
1875
78
50
35
1903
W
hi
30
1875*
17
12
8
1904
•S6
55
*i
1876
55
35
23
1905
89
59
•cw.
1877
76
54
32
' 906
,S9
62
K
1878
85
58
42
|%>7
91
58
40
1879
84
63
38
I<W
(»
4
1880
85
50
2~i
; rJ(\s
85
57
41)
1881
95
59
30
1909
!9
13
7
1882
107
71
45
1 Q09
'86
5i>
55
1883*
20
i i
^
1910'
1
MEMBERS' ALLOWANCES.— (1) 1854: Constitution Ordinance, Section 90
Members: If residence.- hey.'mi ten miles (rum pu,Cf of siltinst. ill i,-r .very .lay ,,; •
honu- tor pri ioil not <-xci-i-<l.;:i; t,lty ci.i\«: plus :: iM-.ii:i ;-!!.. w.nice u! Is. per m.l.
Member: No renrineiation. (2) 1879: Act 6— :.'o'.int: \f.i-mix-is p nJ for n.n-
,.f fifty da-.s as above. i oc.il McmLei*: V, i- mun, it...n. (3) 1888 : Act 16-
Men-.bers: if rcsiuc-no- b<'V..iK: !:ft,vp. nv.!t > ti.-ni ,, a, ,• o: !n.;*. £1 los. f..r.-v-r.
from home lor period not i-xcoed.r.g i-.ni-t'. ,:.iys. plus t ivi-nmtf rxpcns.-s. I .' c.
!{ residence within fifteen miles of place uf «ittinH. i ! ' f,- each ,l.-.y .-.f actual a
4; II U «J
.= > _c _c
s *
"w O 3
^ ff C -I
w-g g «
•I S i c
.1 ! c^.
•£ a(_)
-5_>- o
Irr
• -^ u ._._ *-•-
a:
C ?
^ ° -°
U £
"* " w
£ "I. <
\r\
CO
u
(J
>
o
_c
"~
C
3
<
_c:
o
^ u
oo'
U
V
_c
>
o
d
Z
O
>
C
g
r'
C
o
"3
—
g
UJ
00
00
"En
_c
o
3
0^4
uu
J
oT
-3
1 J
C/3
^
J5
eg
X
UJ
Q
Z
r£
1?
_::
"o
C
1
^r ^
^_£
C
Rj
(
^^*
«
0
— ^
' ^f
o
',-.
RJ
<
00
_Q
U
15
u
u
"3
a.
^r
Z
E
:-
~
C
UJ
<
u
5
r.i.
-5 ^ * -5 •
J
v a
~O o
'^> '.
o —
~-*
^
Q Jf
m .•
2.3 c
,-^
! C 4)
-a u
lO U
00 C
— 3
c/i
H
CO-g
u_
-T
u JU
r^i — ^
— a 3 — a
O
• 2?. ^>
<
CJ
-J
>, >- <u
1 i« O C
U
~ .2'
! ""S O
!_£'<«
r-j !£
| "I
41 -C
c E
O t»
•£•£ 5
1 | I
.QsJ2,|
O oU
c/i
DQ
So ' C
— C.
K".^
-. o c
OCN'
r^
£ c.
a c
"3 o
C to ~ Of.
— r*
U
, — • - so ey.
u
cri
Z
-c
^o
« — ^
— OJ
0^ ^
;i
UJ
g
^
GO -r ^
*~ £. c
M
a:
en
'- '
D
X
UJ
-a oo "^~
r^t — ,.2 ~
o r-j
O- x
60
~
UJ
S
2 S.
<
,
— <0 — — 10
OQ
O w >,
- tO CO
°c£
-r -t-'T i-"
"^ — • f 5
c/itf-5-S
-
o ,_
~ V
*- r^
E £
~ C
-E g
c. ' —
2
INDEX.
(NOTE : Particulars are arranged in chronological order as far as practicable.
Acoustic properties of debating chamber, 63, 122.
Additional Representation B;lls : 1865, obstruction. 41 ; 1898,
deadlock, 88 ; 1904, closure applied, 153-155. (See also Annexurc
D.)
Adjournment of House : By Speaker Brand owing to disorder, 103
note ; for Government House ball, 46 ; on death of Lady Brand,
110; on death of Sir David Tennant, 128; and of both Houses
on death of Sir Christoffel Brand, 111; rush for doors at usual
hours of adjournment, 127.
Admonition and reprimand. Difference between, 151.
Admonitions of members, 102, 123.
Anti-convict association a factor in the struggle for representative
government, 9.
Arderne, R. H., Member of first House, 28.
Arms of Cape Colony, 55 and note.
Aspeling, D. J., Bet with Mr. Chabaud, 107.
Barkly, Sir Henry, Governor, lays foundation stone of new Houses
of Parliament, 55, 120.
Bar of the House : Dr. Tancred committed to custody of Sergeant-
at-Arms, 35 ; Dr. Tancred's apology, 103 ; Counsel m opposition
to private bills, 65 ; merchant reprimanded for attempted bribery,
152; unnerving effect of, 152.
Barry, J., moves that Mr. Fairbairn be elected Speaker, 99.
" Beck Election Act," 85.
Berry, Hon. Sir Wm. Bisset, Speaker (1898-1908): School and
University career, 146; settles in Queenstown, 146; interest in
native affairs and education, 147 ; elected member of House, 147 ;
diction, 66, 147; ruling on enquiry into conduct of members, 74 ;
Chairman of Select Committees, 148; elected Speaker, 148-149;
casting vote, 89; character and appearance, 145, 150, 165; dinners,
151 ; admonishes merchant for attempting to bribe member, 151.
152; applies closure, 153-155; knighthood, 155; re-elected
Speaker, 155; vote of thanks, 155; defeated at general election
156; elected member of Union House, 156.
i88 INDEX.
Bills, Proposal to revive after prorogation, 81 ; introduction by private
members, 85 ; passed without blanks filled up, 86.
Elaine, H, Member of Legislative Council, 1854, 29.
Bond, Afrikander, 67, 74.
Bowker, T. H., Long speech by, 67.
Brand, C., Speaker Brand's grandfather, " Resident " at Simonstown, 97.
Brand, C. J., Speaker Brand's son, First Clerk-Assistant, 27.
Brand, H. B. W. (Viscount Hampden), Speaker of House of Com-
mons, 154.
Brand, Hon. Sir Christoffel, Speaker of Cape House (1854-74) : Birth
and early career, 98 ; connection with Press, 98 ; appointed member
of Legislative Council, and resigns, 10, 99; elected member of
House, 99, and Speaker, 1 00 ; continues to practice as barrister,
101 ; throws bill on floor, 31 ; resumes Chair and admonishes
member, 102; adjourns House owing to disorder, 103 note;
knighthood, 105 ; casting votes, 106, 109 ; notice served on as to
validity of Grahamstown proceedings, 40 ; Chabaud's resignation,
107; defends conduct, 109; last election, 110; votes of thanks,
100, 103, 111 ; appearance, 100, 126, 165; resignation, 1 1 1 ; Free
Masonry, 112; death, 1 1 1 ; influence, 43, 112.
Brand, J. H., Speaker Brand's father, 98.
Brand, Sir John, Speaker Brand's son, member of first House, 29 ;
votes for dissolution of Parliament, 106; President of Orange
Free State, 29.
Bribery and corruption, 74, 151.
British KafTraria Annexation Bill, 40-42.
Buchanan, William and James, reporters, 27.
Bull and Son, Messrs., contractors for " new " buildings, 49.
Call of House, 80.
Casting Votes of Speaker Brand on motion for dissolution of Parlia-
ment, 106, and on resignation of Mr. Chabaud, 109; of Speaker
Juta on motion of no confidence in Government, 138; oi Speaker
Berry on conference between government and opposition, 89.
Censure, Vote of, on Speaker Brand, defeated, 110; on Governor
before responsible government, 41 ; on Governor, disallowed,
after responsible government, 121.
Chabaud, G. L., Resignation of, 107-1 10.
INDEX. 189
Chairman of Committees, Permanent, 45, 117.
Clerks at the Table : First appointments. 27 ; wigs, 62, 82
Closure applied by Speaker Berry, 154, and by Speaker Molteno, 163.
" Commercial Advertiser " publishes debates of Legislative Council
in 1834, 7; and of House of Assembly in 1854, 27.
Commercial Exchange, Meeting of citizens in, 6 ; proposed appro-
priation for Houses of Parliament, 56.
Committee of Selection, Proposal for, negatived, 81.
Committee of Whole House : Speaker Brand resumes Chair owing
to disorder, 102, and speaks in Committee in defence of his conduct,
109; permanent Chairman appointed, 45, 117.
Condolence, Motion of, on death of Sir Thomas Upington, 70 ; and on
death of Speaker Tennant, 128.
Conference between Legislative Council and House of Assembly, 30,
and between Government and Opposition, 88-89.
Confidence, Vote of, in Speaker Brand, 1 10.
Confidence, Vote of Want of, m Government : Before Responsible
Government, 19; Speaker's casting vote, 138; against third
Sprigg Ministry, 141, 87, 149.
Constitution : HISTORY OF ORDINANCE : Agitation for representative
government, 4 ; Earl Grey's acquiescence, 7 ; Porter's draft des-
patched to England, 9 ; Letters patent issued by Queen in Council
laying down main principles, 9 ; considered by Legislative Council
and, after resignation of " popular members, by commission
consisting of remainder of Council, 10, 11 ; despatched to England
a second time, 11; " Sixteen articles " drafted and conveyed to
England by Fairbairn and Stockenstrom, 11, 13; draft constitu-
tion returned to Cape in more complete form, 15 ; despatched to
England for third and last time, 15 ; returned to Cape in " Lady
Jocelyn," 16; PROVISIONS OF ORDINANCE: As to number of
members of Parliament, 17 : officers of Government before respon-
sible government, 19, 169; money bills, 30; seat of Parliament,
37; summoning of Parliament, 39; resignation of members, 108;
term of membership, 182. (For amendments to Constitution
Ordinance see Annexures D and E.)
Constitutions, Colonial, Alteration of, 3, 14.
Contracts between members and Government, 75.
Convicts, Agitation against landing of, 9.
Cook. Captain, Friendship with Speaker Brand's grandfather, $
KJO INDEX.
Council of Advice (1825-1834) : Constituted, 4 ; meets in old Colonial
Office, 5 ; secret proceedings, 5 ; superseded by Legislative and
Executive Councils, 4.
Councils, Legislative. See " Legislative Councils."
Counsel at tnr of House, 65.
Counts-out, 41.
Customs Tariff open to amendment by House, 140.
Darling, Lt. -Governor, opens first Parliament, 18.
Debates, Publication of, 5 and note, 6, 7.
De Villiers, Lord, Member of House in 1872, 43 ; President of Legis-
lative Council, 140.
De Waal, D. C., recommends conference between Government and
opposition, 88.
De Waal, Sir Frederic, when Secretary of Bond, opposes conference
between Government and opposition, 88.
De Wet, J., Member of Legislative Council, 1854, 29.
" Disabling Speeches," 149.
Disagreements between two Houses of Parliament, 29-31.
Disorder : When in Committee of Whole House, Speaker resumes
Chair, 102 ; and when in House, Speaker suspends sitting, 103 note.
Dissolution of Parliament, Motion for, 106 ; (for dates and reasons
for, see Annexure G.)
Dress, 72.
Duelling and challenges to fight, 36, 76, 77.
D'Urban, Sir Benjamin, arrival in Cape Town, and establishment of
Legislative and Executive Councils, 3, 4.
Dutch language allowed in debates, 46.
East versus West, Provincial question of, 105 ; attempt to abolish 45.
Ebden, J. B., Member of Legislative Council, 1854, 29.
Election petitions, 46.
Electric light, Failure of, 73.
Eloquence, 66.
Elsygne, Clerk of the House of Commons, 82.
Executive Council constituted, 4.
Executive Councillors, 1854-1872. See Annexure A.
INDEX. 191
Expenditure : Disagreement with Legislative Council, 30 ; amend-
ments to inter-colonial customs tariff allowed, 140 ; " £1 vote
system " in Estimates condemned, 140.
Fairbairn, John : Secretary of Anti-convict Association, 9 ; appointed
member of Legislative Council, 1850, 10; resigns, II ; character
and work, 1 1 ; deputed to convey " Sixteen Articles " to England,
1 1 ; activity in England, 14 ; return to Cape, 15 ; leader of Press,
98 ; member of first House, 28 ; candidate for Chair, 99 ; attacked
by " Monitor," 28 ; helps to draft Standing Rules, 35; moves vote
of thanks to Speaker, 100, 103.
Fairbndge, C. A. : Member of first House, 28 ; seconds motion for
election of Sir Christoffel Brand as Speaker, 99 ; helps to draft
Standing Rules, 35 ; seconds motion, last election of Speaker Brand,
110.
Freeman, Charles, awarded first prize for design for new Houses of
Parliament, 54 ; appointed resident architect, 56 ; dismissed, 56 ;
subsequent success, 58.
Frere, Sir Bartle, Dismissal of Molteno Ministry, 47 121 ; vote of
censure on, disallowed, 121.
Frivolous motions : By Dr. Tancred, not seconded, 37 ; discounten-
anced, 45 ;
Fuller, Sir Thomas, diction, 66.
Godlonton, R., appointed member of Legislative Council in 1850,
10, and elected in 1854, 29.
Goede Hoop Lodge: Occupation by House of Assembly, 19, 99;
appearance, 25, 26 ; alterations, 44, 63 ; vacated, 49, 1 22 ; garden
used as lobby, 62 ; division lobbies, 63 ; destroyed by fire, 49 ;
rebuilt, 49.
Government defeats : Scanlen Ministry, 1884, on " bug question,
90; Sprigg's Second Ministry, 1890, on railway scheme, 87:
Sprigg's Third Ministry, 1898, on votes of no confidence, 87, 14! ;
averted by Speaker's casting vote, 138, and by conference, (•
(See also Annexure B.)
Government House, Opening Ceremonies held in, from 1854 until
1884, 18, 62.
Government responsibility, 19, 44, 86-90, 121.
Government, Votes of Want of Confidence in. See Confidence
192 INDEX.
Governor : Early authority of, 4 ; messages from, 27, 1 04 ; practice
of sending messengers abandoned, 46 ; returns bills with amend-
ments, 86; confirmation of Speaker's election, 133; signature of,
40; dismisses Molteno Ministry, 47, 121 ; votes of censure on,
41, 121.
Governor's Opening Speech : When communicated to House, 134 ;
address in reply to, discontinued, 46.
Grahamstown, Meeting of Parliament in, 3S\ 107 ; validity of proceed-
ings questioned, 40.
Greaves, H. S., architect of new Houses of Parliament 57 ; attempts
to remedy defects in building, 63.
Grey, Earl, accedes to demand for representative government, 7 ;
epigram on delay in granting constitution, 16 note.
Hatsell, Clerk of House of Commons, on " Call of House," 80.
Hockly, W. H., suggested for Speakership, 14S.
Hofmeyr, Hon. J. H.. introduces bill to. allow use of Dutch language
in debates, 46 ; influence, 67.
Hope, Hon. W., Auditor-General, seat in House, 28.
Houses of Parliament, new buildings : Need for, 53 ; sites and build-
ings proposed, 53, 54 ; Freeman's design accepted, 54 ; foundation
stone laid, 55, 120; building discontinued, 56; new buildings
commenced, 57; completed, 57; entered, 61, 122; division
lobbies, 63.
Innes, Rt. Hon. Sir James Rose, on lawyers in Parliament, 65; success
as counsel at bar of House, 65 ; provokes laughter, 73 ; " Innes
Liquor Act," 85 ; seconds motion for election of Sir Bisset Berry
as Speaker, 149; member of conference between Government
and opposition, 89.
Intemperance, 33.
Invitations, 72.
Jagger, J. W., Public bills introduced by, 85.
Jameson, Rt. Hon. Sir Leander Starr. Bart. : Select Committee on
Raid, 136; silent during whole of 1900 session, 68 ; congratulates
Speaker Berry on knighthood, 155.
Jesters, 69.
Journals, Offensive words expunged from, 74, 124.
INDEX. 103
Juta, Hon. Sir Henry, Speaker (1896-'98): College career, 131 ; elected
member of House, 132; "Juta Irrigation Act," 85; appointed
Attorney-General, 132; elected Speaker, 132; preparation of
rulings, 135 ; rules Prime Minister out of order, 135 ; ruling on
production of papers, 137, and on disclosure of Select Committee
proceedings, 137 ; casting vote on motion of no confidence in
Government, 138; knighthood, 139; insists on control by mem-
bers of expenditure, 139; seating of members' wives at opening
ceremonies, 140; vote of thanks, 141 ; appearance, 133, 165;
defeat at general election and subsequent career, 142.
Kaffrarian Annexation Bill, Discussion on, 40-42.
Kelly, Sir Fitzroy, Spencer Walpole and J. R. Kenyon, legal opinion
on alteration of colonial constitutions, 14.
Kenyon, J. R. See " Kelly.'
' Lady Jocelyn," S.S., conveys Cape constitution in 1853, 16.
Laughter, 73.
Lawyers in Parliament, 64.
Legislation, Hasty, 85-86.
Legislative Council (1834-'53) supersedes Council of Advice, 4 ; sat
in old Supreme Court Buildings, 6, 17; doors opened to public.
7 ; admitted a failure, 9 ; appointment and resignation of " popular
members, 10, 11 ; legal opinion on proposal to reduce quorum.
14; last meeting and expiration, 17.
Legislative Council (1854-1910) constituted, 17; sat in old Supreme
Court Buildings until 1884, 18, 29; disagreements with House of
Assembly, 29-31 ; messages, 30, 31 ; Select Committee on Parlia-
mentary Buildings, 53.
Le Sueur, H. J. P., First Clerk of the House, 27.
Library Buildings, Public, proposed appropriation of, for Houses
of Parliament, 53.
" Limner." See " Murray, R. W."
Longmore, Major G., First Sergcant-at-Arms, 27 ; gives evideno
before Select Committee of Legislative Council, 53.
Maasdorp's pun. 126.
Mace, History of, 38 note.
Manners-Sutton, Charles (Viscount Canterbury), Speaker ot 1
of Commons, 132.
i94 INDEX.
May, Sir Erskine, corresponds with Sir Christoffel Brand, 101 ;
" Parliamentary Practice," 136.
Meintjes, J. J., Member of first House, 28 ; moves that Sir
Christoffel Brand be elected Speaker, 99.
Merriman, Rt. Hon. J. X., preserves unwritten laws of Parliament,
43 ; oratory, 66 ; moves vote of censure on Governor, 121; moves
that words be taken down, 78, 79 ; congratulates Sir Henry Juta
on election as Speaker, 133, on knighthood, 139, and on his ser-
vices to Parliament, 141 ; tribute to Sir Thomas Upington, 70;
Prime Minister at date of Union, 90, 159; moves vote of thanks
to Speaker Molteno, 164; valedictory speech, 91.
Meeting of Parliament before proper time, 39.
Membership, Term of, 182.
Members, Number of, 17, 26, 43, 163. (See also Annexures C and D.)
Members, Payment of, 84. (See also Annexure F.)
Messages to and from Legislative Council, 30, 31 ; from Governor,
27, 104, 46.
Ministerial responsibility, 19, 44. 86-90, 121.
Ministers not necessarily members, 86 ; right to sit and speak in both
Houses, 170.
Ministries under Responsible Government. See Annexure B.
Molteno, Hon. Sir James, Speaker (1908-1910): Ancestors, 159-160;
school and university career, 160 ; elected member of House, 160 ;
elected Speaker, 160; deportment in the Chair, 162; increased
responsibilities, 163; applies closure; 163; vote of thanks, 164;
appearance, 165 : expiry of office on date of Union, 166.
Molteno, Hon. Sir John, Speaker Molteno's father : Member of first
House, 28 ; persuades Mr. Chabaud to withdraw resignation, 108 ;
advocates responsible government, 20 ; appointed first Prime
Minister, 20, 47, 159 ; ministry dismissed, 47. 121 ; seconds vote of
thanks to Gen. Thesiger and Commodore Sullivan, 47.
Money bills, Disagreement between two Houses of Parliament. 29-31.
Monitor " reports debates, 28 ; attacks on Fairbairn, 28.
Montagu, Hon. J., Secretary to Government, 10, 15.
Murray, R. W. (Sen.): "Limner," reporter in 1854, 27; bias, 28;
attacks on Speaker Brand, 110.
Naming a member, 81, 123.
Newcastle, Duke of, Despatch transmitting Constitution Ordinance, 16
INDEX. n;5
Night sitting, \53.
" No confidence " motions. See " Confidence."
Oba, Kaffir Chief, 126.
Obstruction, 41, 69, 102, 153, 163.
Onslow, Arthur, Speaker of House of Commons, 128, 132.
Opening ceremonies: At Government House in 1854, 18; at Gra-
hamstown in 1864, 39 ; in new buildings, 1885, 61 ; by judges and
general during absence of Governor, 62 ; seating arraneements, 140.
Oratory, 66.
Order List : Planning of, 85 ; notices of motions on Government
order day, 135.
Painter, R J., moves vote of censure on Speaker Brand, 109 ; speech
on frontier question, 126.
Papers, Publication by newspaper of MSS. returns, 123; production
of, before a colonial legislature, 136.
Parliamentary Allowances, 84. See also Annexure F
Parliamentary Draftsman, 1 18.
Parliaments and sessions, Duration of. See Annexure G.
Pension for Speaker Brand, 111, and for Speaker Tennant, 128.
Petitions, Presentation of, 118, 119.
Pilkington, Captain George, First Colonial Engineer : Plans for new
Houses of Parliament, 54.
Population in 1834, 7; in 1854, 29.
Porter, Hon. W. : Character, 8 ; drafts constitution, 9, and Responsible
Government Bill, 43 ; seat in House, 28 ; helps to draft Standing
Rules, 35 ; Vote of thanks. 42 ; hands on old traditions of House.
43 ; declines to form ministry, 47 ; oratory, 66 ; on stability of
procedure, 81.
Powers and Privileges of Parliament Act : Recommended by Sir David
Tennant, 125, 137; passed in 1883, 46, 137; pro\ision as to
challenges to fight, 77.
Prayers, 26 note.
Press gains admittance to Legislative Council in 1834, 7; attack
Speaker, 110, and on Select Committee. 74; breach of rule
journalist, 82; publication of MSS. return:;, 123. and
Committee proceedings, 137.
iq6 INDEX.
Press Gallery : In Goede Hoop Lodge, 27, 44 ; in " new " buildings,
83, 122.
Private Bills, Counsel at bar in opposition to, 65.
Privilege, Breaches of: Publication of manuscript returns, 123; dis-
closure of proceedings of select committee, 137; bribery, 151 ;
reflection by newspaper on integrity of Select Committee, 74.
Prorogation ceremonies discontinued, 46.
Purity of Proceedings, 74, 123-124, 151.
Quorum of House, 41, and of Council, 10, 11, 14.
Rawson, Hon. Sir R. W., Colonial Secretary : Seat in House, 28 ;
official dress worn in House, 72.
Rawson, Rear-Admiral Sir Harry, Vote of thanks to, 72.
Recess, 138.
Reform Bill of 1870, 20.
Reitz, F. W., appointed member of Legislative Council, 1850, 10;
resigns, 11 ; member of Legislative Council, 1854, 29.
Reporters. See " Press " and " Press Gallery."
Reprimand and admonition, F^ifference between, 151.
Reprimand for bribery, 151.
Resignation of G. L. Chabaud, 107-110.
Resolution rescinded, 106.
Responsible Government, Introduction of, 19, 20, 43, 44, 47, 86, 103
note, 104; effect on length of sessions, 84. (For ministries under
Responsible Government see Annexure B.)
Rhodes, Rt. Hon. C. J. : Speeches, 67 ; moves that offensive words
be expunged from journals, 1 24 ; dress, 72 ; succeeds Spngg as
Prime Minister in 1890, 87 ; suggests conference between Govern-
ment and opposition, 88, and is member of conference, 89 ; moves
vote of thanks to Speaker Tennant, 124.
Richardson, Thomas, Speaker of House of Commons, practises as
barrister, 101.
Rivers, Hen. H., Treasurer-General, 15, 28.
Robinson, Sir Hercules (Lord Rosmead), opens Parliament in new
buildings, 61 .
Rothman, J. N., leave to enter House with umbrella, 76.
Rutherford. H. E., member of Legislative Council, 1854, 29.
INDEX. 197
Sampson, Hon. V., moves that words be taken down, 79.
Sauer, Hon. J. W., faculty for criticism, 66 ; praises senile speech
by Sir Gordon Sprigg, 71 ; claims right to name member, 81 ;
brushes off Clerk's wig, 82 ; member of conference between Gov-
ernment and opposition, 89.
Scanlen, C., seconds vote of censure on Speaker Brand, 109.
Scanlen, Sir T. C., preserves unwritten laws of Parliament, 43 ; Ministry
defeated on " bug " question, 90.
Schermbrucker, Hon. Col. F., character, 69 ; injures his hand, 76 ;
improper expression, 79 ; death, 69.
Schremer, Rt. Hon. W. P., seconds motion for election of Sir Henry
Juta as Speaker, 132; Prime Minister on defeat of Third Sprigg
Ministry, 87 ; moves resolution of condolence on death of Upington,
70 ; agrees to conference with opposition, 89.
Secret Sessions, 5.
Select Committee on Chabaud's resignation, 108; on Jameson Raid,
136; on Afrikander Bond, 74.
Select Committees: Rules for guidance of, 118; production of tele-
grams before, 137; publication of proceedings, 137; integrity
questioned, 74.
Separation of Eastern and Western Provinces, 7, 37, 39, 45, 67.
Sergeant-at-Arms : Removes member from House, 103 ; takes mem-
bers in custody, 34; gives evidence before Council Select Com-
mittee, 53 ; formerly cleared gallery when House divided, 63 ;
introduces messengers from Governor, 27, 104; attends Counsel
at bar, 65, and persons to be reprimanded, 151, 152; rules drafted
for guidance, 1 18.
Session lasting five and a half months, 84 ; lasting only an hour and a
quarter, 165. (For length of sessions, see Annexures F. and (.j.)
Sessions, Secret, 5.
Shaw College, Grahamstown, Opening of Parliament in, 39; Proro-
gation ceremony, 40.
Simonstown, Members of Parliament attend entertainments at.
Sivewright, Hon. Sir James, congratulates Speaker Juta on knui
139; improper expression, 7
" Sixteen Articles " drafted and conveyed to England,
Smartt, Hon. Sir Thomas, fluency, 66.
ig8 INDEX.
Smith, Sir Harry, admits Legislative Council (1834-'53) to be a failure,
9 ; consults Attorney-General as to form of proposed constitution,
8 ; asks divisional road and municipal boards to elect members
for Legislative Council, 10.
Solomon, Saul, member of first House, 29 ; opposes Reform Bill, 20 ;
motion of censure on Governor, 41 ; hands on old traditions of
House, 43 ; declines to form ministry, 47 ; logic, 66 ; supports
the Speaker, 109, 121 ; appearance, 121.
Solomon, Sir Richard, Attorney-General when not a member, 86.
Somerset, Lord Charles, Council appointed to advise and assist, 4.
Southey, Hon. Sir Richard, declines to form Ministry, 47.
Speakers' Chairs, 27, 44, 63, 161 ; dinners, 151 ; hat, 120, 123, 152;
procession, 145 ; qualifications, 156.
Speakership, Continuity of, 165.
Speaker's Ministry," 139.
Speaker's rulings : Prepared in advance, 1 35 ; analysed and anno-
tated, 138 ; questioned by House, 121, 134 ; on vote of censure on
Governor, 121 ; on time for communicating Governor's speech,
134; on Order List, 135; on production of telegrams, 137; on
publication of proceedings of Select Committee, 137; on control
of expenditure, 139-140; on right of House to inquire into mem-
bers' conduct, 74.
Speeches, length, etc., 67.
Spirit of the House, 70.
Sprigg, Rt. Hon. Sir Gordon, preserves unwritten laws of Parliament,
43 ; rhetoric, 66 ; forgets parliamentary practice, 81 ; forms his
first ministry, 47 ; moves vote of thanks to Gen. Thesiger and
Commodore Sullivan, 47 ; second ministry defeated, 87 ; moves
vote of thanks to Speaker Tennant, 128 ; moves that Sir Henry Juta
be elected Speaker, 132 ; third ministry saved by casting vote, 138,
but afterwards defeated, 141 ; moves vote of thanks to Speaker
Juta, 141 ; moves that Sir Bisset Berry be elected Speaker, 149;
third ministry again defeated, 87, 149 ; attempts to speak on death
of Sir Thomas Upmgton, 70 ; as leader of opposition is member of
conference between Government and opposition, 89; death, 71.
Standing Rules and Orders : Drafting of oiiginal rules, 35 ; subse-
quent editions, 80 note; revised by Speaker Tennant, 45, 118;
aim of, 76; interpretation of, 156; stability, 80, 81, 118; as to
words of heat, 77-79 ; call of House, 80.
INDEX.
100
Sticks and umbrellas not allowed in House, 76.
Stockenstrom, A., Attorney-General, when not a member, 86.
Stockenstrom, Sir Andnes, Bart., appointed member of Legislative
Council, 1850, 10; resigns, 11; deputed to convey "Sixteen
Articles " to England, 1 1 ; activity in England, 14 ; return to Cap-,
15 ; member of Legislative Council, 1854, 29.
Strangers : Exclusion of, 5 and note, 82-84 ; at one time precluded
from witnessing divisions, 63.
Sullivan, Commodore, Vote of thanks to, 48.
Supreme Court Buildings (Old), meeting of Legislative Councils in,
6, 17, 29; proposed use for House of Assembly, 25.
Tamplin, Ma)or, speaks on death of Upington, 71.
Tancred, Dr., member of first House, 28 ; committed to custody of
Sergeant-at-Arms, 34 ; challenges member to fight, 36 ; moves
frivolous amendment, 37 ; admonished by Speaker, 102 ; death, 69.
Telegrams, production of, before Select Committee, 137.
Tennant, Alexander (" Singing Sannock "), Speaker Tennant's grand-
father, settles in Cape Town, 115.
Tennant, Hercules, Speaker Tennant's father, compiler of '- Notary's
Manual," 117.
Tennant, Hon. Sir David, Speaker (1874-96): Parentage and youth,
115-116; elected member of House, 117; preserves unwritten
laws of Parliament, 43; Chairman of Committees, 117, and
Speaker, 117; drafts standing rules and orders, 45, 118; conveys
vote of thanks to Gen. Thesiger and Commodore Sullivan, 48 ;
honours, 120 and note ; connection with building of new houses
of Parliament, 120, 122; a belated ruling, 121 ; admonishes member,
123; protects member, 123; recommends act to define powers
and privileges of Parliament, 125, 137; attacked by newspaper
82; deprecates hasty legislation, 86; sense of humour, 125;
decorum, 127; resignation, 127; appointed Agent-General, 127 :
appearance, 126, 165; votes of thanks, 124, 128; death. 12J-
Te Water, Hon. Dr. T., member of conference between government
and opposition, 89.
Thanks, Votes of : To Wm. Porter, 42 : to Gen. Fhesiger and ( om-
modore Sullivan, 48 ; to Rear-Admiral Sir Harry Rawson.
to Speaker Brand, 100, 103, 111 ; to Speaker Tennant,
to Speaker Juta 141 ; to Speaker Berry, 155; to Speaker >
164.
200 INDEX.
Theron, T. P. (President of Bond and Chairman of Committees) :
Congratulates Sir Henry Juta on election as Speaker, 133, and
on his services, 141 ; opposes conference between government
and opposition, 88 ; congratulates Speaker Berry on knighthood, 155.
Thesiger, General, Vote of thanks to, 48.
Tiptoft, Sir John, Speaker of House of Commons, in 1406, 131.
Tucker, Mr. Scott, Civil Engineer, plans for new Houses of Parlia-
ment discarded, 54.
Umbrellas and sticks not allowed in House, 76.
Upmgton, Hon. Sir Thomas : Oratory, 66 ; leave to enter House with
stick, 76 ; moves that words be taken down, 79 ; death, 70.
Walpole, Spencer, Legal opinion on alteration of Colonial constitutions,
14.
Walter, W., First permanent Chairman of Committees, 45.
Watermeyer, E. B., LL.D., Member of first House. 28 ; helps to frame
rules, 35.
Watermeyer, P. J. A., seconds motion, last election of Speaker Brand, 1 10.
Walton, Hon. Sir Edgar, on courtesy of House, 75.
Ways and Means, Committee of, Rules for guidance of, 1 18.
Wigs, first worn by Clerks at Table, 62 ; Clerk's wig brushed off by
"Mr. Sauer, 82.
Wodehouse, Sir Philip, Governor, reactionary attempts to amend
constitution, 19, 20 ; summons Parliament to meet in Grahams-
town, 39 ; vote of censure on, 41.
Wolf, G. G., admonished by Speaker, 123.
Wood G., member of Legislative Council, 1854, 29.
Words of heat, 78, 79, 80, 134.
Work of the House, 84.
Wylde, Hon. Sir John, Chief Justice, swears in Governor, 1834, 3 ;
President of Legislative Council, 1854, 29.
Ziervogel, J. F., member of first House, 28; helps to frame rules, 35 ;
opposes Reform Bill, 20 ; challenged to fight by Dr. Tancred, 36 ;
hands on traditions of House, 43.
Zonnebloem, Residence of Speaker Tennant's grandfather, 115.
" Zuid Afrikaan " newspaper, Connection of Speaker Brand with, 98.
PRINTKD BY
THE ARGUS PRINTING AND PI-BUSHING G).. LID..
C\PF. TOWN.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LIBRARY
Los Angeles
This book is DUE on the last date stamped below.
Form L9-757n-7,'61(Cl437s4)444
PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE
THIS BOOK CARD
I I
I I
"
1 583 8
University Research Library