Skip to main content

Full text of "An old deed, May 31, 1675"

See other formats


HoIIinger 


^5>5>'7^5>:'>^5'>:.^,5>:^ 


r 


n 


MAY   31 


iV  ^ — 


Richard  Guy   John  hmkk   Thomas  Pyfe 


AN  OLD  DEED 


MAY    31    1675 


Richard  Guy    John  Fenwick    Thomas  Pyle 


EDWARD     S.    SHARPE.    M.    D. 

PRESIDENT 


READ       BEFORE      THE      SALEM      COUNTY       HISTORICAL 
SOCIETY     ON     DECEMBFR     8.     1908. 


PRESS  OF  STANDARD  AND  JER5EY 


The  Society 


V\^-[ 


AN    OLD    DEED. 


In  compiling  tlie  following  paper  relat- 
ing to  the  very  first  sales  of  lands  in  j 
Fenwick's  Colony,  1  take  the  oppor- 
tunity of  calling  the  attention  of  this 
Society  to  an  "Old  Deed,"  the  oldest  of 
several  very  rare  and  valuable  parch- 
ment manuscripts  in  my  possession, 
bearing  date  nearly  one  year  anterior  to 
that  of  one  already  exhibited— belonging 
to  a  series  known  as  the  William  Penu 
Deeds  witli  autographic  signatures  of 
Wm.  Penn,  Gawau  Laurie,  Nicholas 
Lucas  and  Edward  ByUinge. 

It  was  executed  the  thirty-first  day 
of  May  1675,  and  conveyed  to  Richard 
Guy  teuthousand  acres  of  land  in  this 
county  of  Salem,  in  what  is  now  the 
Tewnship  of  Pilesgrve,  and  "located  in 
the  upper  part  of  Salem  tenth  where  the 
township  of  Pilesgrove  is  now." 
(Shourds.) 

The    price    paid    by    Guy    for    this    large 
tract    of    land,    was    fifty   pounds    Stirling, 
about    two    hundred    and    fifty    dollars    in 
our    currency.      The    deed    is    signed    by  I 
Fen  wick     and     endorsed: — 

"Inroled     in     tlie     Register     Liber    A 

belonging   to    Fenwick's  Colony    in    the 

Province     of    New     Cesarea     or     New 

Jersey    in    America,    tlie   XVIII  th   day 

of    June    MDCLXXV. 

per    J.    Garfield." 

There  is  also  a  separate  piece  of  parch- 
ment attached  to  this  remarkable  scrip- 
tory  airtique,  upon  which  is  written  in 
exquisite  caligrapliy  a  receipt  for  tlie 
above  fifty  pounds  sterling,  signed  by 
Fenwick  also  by  ten  witnesses,  whose 
names  are  again  written  on  the  back  of 
the    deed,     viz: — 

"John    Smith.    Samuel     ,ic-holson.    Rich- 


ard Mergan.  Peter  Hoff.  Edward  Champ- 
neys,  Edward  Wade  Thomas  Anderson, 
Edmund  Warner,  Richard  Noble  and 
James..    Garfieldser." 

The  property  conveyed  was  one  of  a 
numerous  category,  sold  by  Fenwick  be- 
fore he  sailed  for  America,  to  be  lo- 
cated   after'    nis    arr'ival    there. 

iA^lthough  the  name  of  tire  purchaser 
is  ostensibly  Richard  Guy,  it  was  actually 
Thomas  Pyle,  a  citizen  of  London,  for 
whom  he  oought  it.  on  the  same  day 
he  acquired  for  himself  and  wife.  Bridg- 
ett  Guy,  a  deed  for  one  thousand  acres 
of  land  af'erward  located  in  Klsinboro. 
Salem  county. 

Most  of  tlie  above  signers  of  the  deed 
and  receipt  for  the  money  given  liy  Fen- 
wick afterward  emigrated  to  Anrei'ica. 
The  last  on  the  li?t,  james  Garfieldser. 
did  not,  the  final  letters  of  the  sur- 
nanre.  s.  e.  r.  are  supposed  to  represent, 
not  family  senority,  but  to  be  an  abbi-e- 
vi;i,tJoiiI  of  his  professional  title,  that  of 
a  scij^n?nei'.  and  he  probably  wiote  this 
vei't*  deed,  the  chirography  being  thai 
of  an  old  man.  Indeed  he  did  not  long 
survive  the  period  we  refer  to.  as  Maiy 
Fenwick  in  a  letter  to  her  husband  1678. 
Aug.  27th,  announces  his  death  in  terms 
Of  affectionate  regai'd;  in  the  interval. 
liDwexer,  he  signed  his  name  to  docu- 
ments coirnected  with  the  litigation  al 
that  time  pending  between  Fenwick  and 
Eldr'dge  and  Warner  in  the  City  of 
T.,ondon. 

The  Townsh'p  of  Pilesgrove  did  not 
derive  its  name  from  the  ten  thousand 
acre  tract,  deeded  to  Richard  Guy  in  its 
entirety,  but  only  from  a  part  of  It. 
where   Thoma?    Pyle.    (whose    surname    is 


IH'ipctuated  by  it)  built  his  liome.  Tliis 
is  sliowr.  liy  tlie  following  deed  ma  le 
by  William  Hall  to  John  Hopman,  in 
wbicli  he  reserves  half  an  acre  that  was 
i-.sed  as  a  private  cemetery  and  from 
this  circumstance  we  assume  that  it  w.is 
the    original    homstead    of   Pyle,    viz: — 

••1()9:!,  Oct.  3,  Deed.  William  Hall,  of 
Salem  Town,  W.  J.,  yeoman,  and  wife, 
Eiizabetli,  to  John  Hopman,  of  Rattcoon 
Creek.  Glossester  Co.,  l-.usbandman.  for 
the  Plantation  called  Pile  Grove.  3S0 
acres,  between  the  branches  of  Salem 
Creek  adjoining  Joseph  White,  excepting- 
1  a  If  a.  used  as  a  burying  place."  (Salem 
Deeds.    No.    G.) 

This  deed  was  for  a  part  of  the  de- 
n^ense— manor  house  witli  land— com- 
l)rising  two  thousand  acres,  part  of 
which  liad  been  previously  deeded  to 
W  lliam    jiall,    viz: — 

••ir93.  June  15th,  Deed.  Thomas  Pyle, 
of  Pile  Grove.  Salem  Co.,  gentleman,  to 
W'lliam  Hall,  of  Salem  Town,  yeoman, 
for  1000  acres,  the  upper  half  of  the 
2000  acre  iract  called  Pile  Grove."' 
(S'lem    Deeds,    No.    6.) 

This  is  probably  the  final  conveyance 
executed  by  Tliomas  Pyle,  as  his  last 
v.-ill  and  testament  only  two  months,  less 
two  days  laier  indicates;  and  we  know 
I'e  certainly  died  before  October  lltli. 
1C95. 

It  has  bee:i  stated  that  Pyle  became  a 
very  considerable  land  owner  in  Fen- 
wick's  Colony  by  sundiy  purcliases  of 
real  estate  besides  tlie  large  tract  al- 
ready referred  to.  I  have  failed  to 
confirm  this;  finding  in  my  researches 
nothing  bou.ght,  but  numerous  s'ales  as 
well  as  gifts  of  tracts  originally  parts 
of  the  purchase  made  by  Richard  Gu.y. 
Tlie  gifts  were  mostly  of  his  daughter 
and  lier  husliand,  William  Hall,  one  of 
waich.    tlie    largest,     I    quote,    viz: 

"1('02.  Aug.  17,  Deed.  Thomas  Pile  (as 
before)  to  William  Hall  and  wife,  Eiiza- 
betli. daughter  of  said  Thomas,  for  4.0U0 
.-icros    of    the    preceding    lO.oiiii    and    after 


his     death     2,000    more."      (Salem    Deeds, 
No.    5.) 

Richard    Guy    doubtless    came    over    to 
America  in   the  ship   "Griffith"   with  John 
j  Fenwick    in    1675    and    the    following    year 
we   find   this   Warrant   of   Survey,    viz: 

"167(5,  12d,'9m  (Nov.)  Warrant  of  Sur- 
vey  to  Richard  Guy  of  1,000  acres  at  or 
near  the  point  formerly  called  Elsiii- 
burge  Fort  and  Now  Guy's  r-oiiit,  form- 
erly granted  to  John  Townsend,  said 
name  having  been  sused  fictitionsly." 
(Salem    Surveys   l(i7G.) 

He  was  early  an  active  participant  in 
the  affairs  of  the  Colony  and  wneii  "John 
Fenwick  took  the  oath  of  office  as  Gov- 
ernor of  -'enwiek's  Colony,  1676,  June  21," 
the  same  day  "Richaid  Guy  of  Guys 
Point,  Township  of  New  Salem,  Fen- 
wick's  Colony,  planter,  (likewise)  took 
the  oath  as  member  of  the  Governor's 
Council."      (Salem    Surveys    1676.) 

Thomas  Pyle's  wife,  nee  Sarah  Can- 
non, was  a  daughter  and  namesake  of 
Sarah  Cannon,  who  owned  land  In  the 
Town  of  New  Salem,  which  she  be- 
queathed to  said  Sarah  Pyle,  as  appears 
from  the  following  Power  of  Attorney, 
which  is  interesting  from  the  light  it 
tlirows  on  the  residence  of  Samuel  Car- 
penter  in   16S..    viz:— 

"16.S6,  April  23d.  Sarah  Pile,  of  Pile 
Grove,  by  her  Attorney,  William  Hall.. 
of  the  same  place.  Salem  Tenth,  AV.  J., 
yeoman,  to  Samuel  Carpenter,  of  Elsin- 
boroug.i,  said  tenth,  merchant,  for  :;2 
acres  in  the  Town  of  Salem,  on  Fen- 
wick's  River,  and  the  highway  from 
Salem  Landing.  be(|ueatlied  to  said  Sai-an 
by  lier  motlier,  Sarah  Cannon,  who 
bought  the  lot  of  John  Smith,  June  4. 
1683."      (Salem  Deeds,    No.    4.) 

From  the  dates  of  -he  preceding  com- 
mission we  know  that  Sarah  Cannon 
died  before  the  year  1686.  About  one 
vcar  previously.  Samuel  Carpenter,  then 
residing  in  Philadelphia.  bought  tlie 
Guy's  Point  Estate  and  hau  removed  to 
Elsinboro  as  shown  by  the  followin,g 
deed,    viz: — • 


"  THE    CAPITALL    HOUSE  " 

William  Hall.    1691.  Joshua   Bradway.    1791. 


"1685,  May  13th.  deed.  Richard  Guy, 
late  of  Elsiiibiirgh,  Salem  Tenth.  W.  J., 
yeomon  and  wife,  Bridgett,  to  Samuel 
Carpenter,  of  Philadelpiiia.  merchant, 
for  812  acres  at  Elsinburgii."  (Salem 
Deeds,  No.  6.) 

The  words  "UUe  of  Elsinburgh"  imply 
the  removal  of  Richard  Guy,  after  a 
residence  of  ten  years— h.is  old  friend. 
tie  Proprietor,  having  been  dead  about 
two  years— from  Salem  to  Burlington, 
wliere  he  made  his  will,  1689.  September 
■22.  leaving  "wife,  Bridgett,  sole  heiress 
and  executrix  of  real  and  personal  es- 
tate." "proved  December  2.  1693."  In- 
cluded in  the  inventory  of  his  estate 
is  "a  moi-tgage  of  £  300.  on  a  plantation 
al  E!?inborrow  due  by  Samuel  Capen- 
ter."  Bridgett  Guy  survived  her  hus- 
band about  five  years,  dying  in  1698. 
Samuel  Carpenter  was  named  one  of  her 
executors.  In  the  deed  to  the  latter  from 
Sarah  Pyle  of  the  22  acres  "on  the  high- 
way from  Salem  Landing"  it  is  said  her 
mother.  Sarah  Cannon,  "bouglit  the  lot 
of  John  Smith,  June  4th,  1683,"  and  on 
llie  same  day  Samuel  Carpenter  came 
in'o  possession  of  the  said  twenty  and 
two  acres.  April  12,  1686,  he  assigned  it 
to  "William  Kylle,"  of  Salem.  W.  J., 
and  five  years  later  lacking  eleven  days, 
this  same  lot  became  the  property  of  Wm. 
l-;all.  who  previou.sly  sold  it  to  Samuel 
Carpenter  as  Attorney  for  Sarah  Pyle, 
viz — 

"1691.  A  pill  2d.  William  Kelly,  of  Salem 
Town,  weaver,  to  William  Hall,  late  of 
Pile  Grove,  now  of  Manneton  Creek,  W. 
J.,  yoeman.  and  wife,  Elizabeth,  for  22 
acres  in  the  Town  of  Salem,  sold  by 
said  Hall  to  Samuel  Carpenter,  April  13, 
16S6,  and  assigned  by  said  Carpenter  on 
the  same  day  to  present  grantor." 
(Salem  Deeds,   No.   5.) 

The  exact  location  of  the  Smith,  Can- 
non. Carpenter,  Kelly,  Hall  Town  Lot  is 
definitely  settled,  by  its  being  named  in 
the  following  memorandum  of  sale,  as 
thp  place  whene  a  certain  payment  of 
nionev   wa.«    to   be    made,   viz: — 


"1685-16,  22d,  12th  m.  (February),  Mem. 
of  Sale.  Wm.  Groome  to  Richard  Mar- 
shall of  200  acres  in  AUoways  Creek, 
bought  of  Marcus  Elger.  of  Middle  Neck, 
Salem  Tenth,  who  is  to  give  deed,  the 
land  adjoins  Dennis  ffishers  500  a. — "pur- 
chase consideration  to  be  delivered  at 
Wm.  Kelly's  house  at  Salem  Town 
landing."    (Salem    Surveys.    No.    8.) 

In  the  year  1701  Samuel  Carpenter, 
then  a  merchant  of  Pliiladelphia,  sold  to 
"Rothro"  Morris,  of  Salem  Co..  W.  .1.. 
yeoman,  the  plantation  of  twelve  him- 
dred  acres  in  Elsinboro,  viz:— 

"1701,  Nov.  20.  Do,  Samuel  Carpenter, 
of  Philadelphia,  merchant,  and  wife, 
Hannah,  to  "Rothro"  Morris,  of  Salem 
Co..  W.  J.,  yeoman,  for  the  planta- 
tion of  1200  acres  in  said  county  called 
Elsinburg."    (Salem    Deeds.) 

Thus  we  find  that  Carpenter  owned 
property  in  Fenwick's  Colony  from  1085 
to  1701.  sixteen  years  and  resided  there 
part    of    that    time. 

John  Smythe,  the  original  owner  of  the 
lot  he  sold  to  Sarah  Cannon,  was  deed- 
ed sixteen  acres  of  the  two  and  twenty 
by  John  Fenwick,  that  being  the  size 
of  the  Town  Lots,  inclusive,  awarded 
to  each  purchaser  of  one  thousand  acres; 
the  additional  six  acres  having  been  ac- 
quired by  a  separate  deed,  also  from  the 
Proprietor  'In  verba  magistri'  jurare." 
(To  swear  by  the  words  of  a  master). 
— Edson  Saulbbury  Jones,  Esq..  of  Port 
Cliester,  N.  Y.,  who  in  his  valuable  paper 
read  before  this  Society  December  10, 
1907,  has  ably  discussed  the  present  sub- 
ject, says  it  "was  deeded  to  him  by 
Fenwick    in   1679."    (Town    Grants    P.    5.) 

He  conveyed  both  lots  to  Sarah  Can- 
non,    viz: — 

"1683,  June  4,  Joliu  Smith,  of  Mon- 
m.outh  R,  alias  Alloways  Creek,  W.  J.. 
gentleman,  and  wife,  Martha,  to  widow 
Sarali  Cannon,  of  New  Salem,  'W.  J.,  for 
22  acres  in  New  Salem  Township,  16 
thereof  along  the  highway  and  ffen- 
v.-iek's    River,     the    other    6    on    the    road 


from  Salem  Landing."  (Salem  Deeds, 
No.    2.) 

We  observe  from  the  above  deed  that 
only  six  acres  of  the  two  and  twenty 
conveyed  to  Sarali  Cannon  were  "on  the 
road    from    Saiem    Landing." 

The  Warrant  for  the  Survey  of  the 
sixteen  acre  lot  for  John  Smythe  reads 
as    follows,    viz:  — 

"1G76,  Sept.  19th.  Do  Do.  to  John  Smytlic 
for  a  liome  lot  of  16  acres  in  New 
Salem."       (Salem    Surveys,    1676.) 

" Note:      The    like    warrant    for 

Roger  Huckings,  Samuel  Nicholson,  Ed- 
ward Champneys,  Edward  Warner,  Wm. 
Hancock,  Edward  Bourne  of  the  same 
date."  (New  Jersey  Colonial  Docu- 
ments.) 

We  have  mentioned  that  John  Fen- 
wick  took  the  oath  of  office  as  Gover- 
nor of  his  Colony  1676,  June  21;  and  after 
his  decease,  in  1685-6  we  find  in  a  deed  to 
William  Wilkensen  a  reference  to  the 
"Governor's  lot."  (Town  Grants  Liber 
A.    Page    343.) 

The  inference  from  the  following  ab- 
stract, naturally  is,  that  Governor  Fen- 
wick  had  an  official  residence  in  the 
Town,  which  may  explain  in  a  measure, 
the  designation  "Governor's  House," 
which  lias  been  associated  with  the  so 
called  "Bradway  House,"  at  the  foot  of 
West   Broadway  in  this   city,   viz:— 

"1685-6,  Jan.  20,  do  same  to  William 
Wilkinson,  of  New  Salem,  planter,  for 
10  a.  there  on  the  street  to  the  Gover- 
nor's Lot."  (Town  Grants,  liber  A.  Page 
343.) 

In  the  Archives  of  the  State  we  meet 
with  tlie  names  "Broadaways  street"  also 
"Bradaways  street"  also  "Brod  street," 
earlier  "Main  street"  and  "The  High- 
way." in  1701  it  was  called  "Salem  street." 
viz: — 

"1679,  May  15,  do  same  to  Christopher 
Sanders,  of  New  Salem,  yeoman,  and 
wife,  Mary,  for  Sanders  Lot  14  acres  on 
"Bradaways  street  N.  E.  Robitnson's 
riantation"  and  "Tnrolled  May  30.  1G79. 
Patent.      Same    to    Richard    Robinson,    of 


New  Salem,  yeoman,  and  wife.  Elinoi-, 
for  a  lot  on  Broadaway's  St..  10  a.'' 
(Archives    P.    34.) 

Again  1692,  August  17,  do  Jonatlian 
Beei-e,  of  Salem  Town,  yeoman,  aiul 
wife.  Mary,  to  Henry  Hurley,  of  tli(> 
same  place,  weaver,  for  a  lionsc  and  lot 
of  14  acres  there,  at  the  corner  ol"  Krad'i- 
way's  street  along  said  street  to  the  S. 
W.  side  of  Robinson's  plantation,  grant- 
ed by  John  Fenwick  to  Christopher  San- 
ders and  wife,  Mary,  May  22,  1679"  and 
by  them  conveyed  to  grantors.  October 
9tb.    1686."      (Salem    Deeds.    No.    5.) 

The  preceding  compilation  from  the 
published  Archives  of  New  Jersey  are 
included  in  this  paper  on  account  of  their 
possible  relation  to  one  of  the  original 
or  very  early  names  of  what  is  now 
known  as  West  Broadway,  one  of  the 
principal  streets  of  the  City  of  Salem 
and  of  late  year's  long  known  as  Brad- 
way  street.  In  fact  Shourds  in  his  val- 
uable "History  of  Fenwick's  Colony" 
says  that  in  "1693  the  Town  of  Salem 
was  incorporated  into  a  bor-ough  and 
the  authorities  of  the  town  changed  the 
name  of  Wharf  street  to  Bradway  street 
in  honor  of  Edwai-d  Bradway,"  who, 
although  the  owner  of  valuable  pr-opeily 
in  the  Town  of  New  Salem,  clearly 
pointed  out  by  Mr.  Jones  in  his  paper 
alr-eady  referred  to,  never,  as  far  as  1 
have  been  able  to  learn  resided  there, 
except  as  Mr.  Jones  says  "though  un- 
doubtedly he  fir-st  lived  there,  as  in  the 
Meeting  Records  a  minute  is  found  show- 
ing that  a  committee  of  four  was  ap- 
pointed on  12  mo.  1679.  (February  2.  1679- 
SO)  ti)  view  liis  house  and  see  if  it  was 
suitable  fdi-  ii  meeting  house.  As  earl.v 
as  June  6,  1680  he  was  of  Alloways  Cr'eek 
(Salem  Deeds  5,34.1)  and  such  was  the 
sepcified  abode  at  all  later  times."  And 
there  he  died  1693,  his  will  being  dated 
Dec.  6,  1693,  in  which  his  residence  is 
given    as    follows,    viz:— 

"1693,  Dec.  6th.  Bradway  Edward,  of 
Monmouth    River-,    Salem    Co.,    yeoman." 

Thei-e  was  however  a  street  in  New  Salorir 


PENNY    HILl.    SALEV,     N.    J. 


s 


iirtined  "Edward  Bradway's  street."  bin, 
it  was  apparantly  situated  in  auotlier 
part  of  the  Town  now  or  recently  known 
as  "Penny  Hill"  and  is  mentioned  in  the 
following   deed:— 

"16S9,  May  27,  Do.  John  Ireson,  of 
Salem  Town,  tanner,  to  Richard  Marshall 
of  Salem  Co.,  planter,  for  10  acres  in  the 
Town,  on  Edward  Bradways  street,  lately 
in  the  tenure  of  Charles  Bagley." 
(Salem     Deeds,     No.    5.) 

As  the  incorporation  of  the  Town  of 
Salem  into  a  borrough  did  not  take  place 
until  li59o,  the  date  of  the  above  deed 
conflicts  with  the  statement  of  Thomas 
Shourds,  informing  us  that  four  years 
previous  to  that  event,  i  e— in  1689  "Ed- 
ward Bradways  street"  was  one  of  the 
tlioroughfares  of  the  village,  and  there- 
fore the  conferring  of  the  honor,  of  the 
naming  of  the  street,  on  Edward  Brad- 
way,  by  tlie  "Authorities  of  the  Town," 
is  apparently  incorrect,  nor  Is  it  probable 
that  such  an  obvious  impropriety  under 
the  circumstances,  as  the  changing  of 
the  name  to  Salem  street,  doubtless 
years  before  1791.  could  have  been  per- 
mitted by  "the  rude  forefathers  of  the 
Hamlet." 

"We  may  be  able  to  form  conclusions 
as  to  the  general  bearing  of  the  street 
named  after  him  and  other  property  of 
Edward  Bradway  by  another  and  the  last 
deed  pertaining  to  his  subject  to  which 
I    invite    your   attention,    viz:^ 

"1685,  25th  d.  6th  m.  (August)  Do  Rich- 
ard Wilkinson,  of  New  Salem,  laborer, 
to  Richard  Johnson,  of  the  same  place, 
carpenter,  for  that  part  of  the  16  a.  lot, 
bought  of  Edward  Bradway  (Supra  P. 
22.)  lying  on  the  N.  W.  side  of  a  line 
drawn  from  tlie  outermost  bounds  of 
grantee's  10  a.  lot  by  the  highway  lead- 
ing from  Salem  Town  to  Ihi'  Mill  Creek." 
(Archives     P.     582.) 

Finally  m  tne  cimveyances.  divers  and 
sundry.  from  John  Smythe  through 
Sarah  Cannon.  Samuel  Carpenter.  Wil- 
liam Kelly  to  William  Hall  we  ai'e  un- 
;ihh>     to     trace     an.\-     ownerships     to     this 


property,  except  those  already  included 
in  this  paper,  the  evidence  being  con- 
clusively in  favor  of  the  statement  of 
Mr.  Jones  that  "Thei-e  is  every  reason 
to  believe  that  the  house  which  bears 
upon  its  East  gable  the  date  1691,  was 
built  by  William  Hall  and  that  he  had 
established  it  as  his  inn  by  1692.  His  will 
dated  .Api'il  10th.  171",  devised  to  his  son. 
William,  the  "Capital!  house,"  where 
the  testator  dwelt,  with  all  the  lots 
bought  of  William  Kelly." 
T  am  of  the  opinion  that  we  have  found 
1  no  valid  reason  for  re.iecting  his  con- 
I  elusions,  together  with  his  infoi-mation, 
j  that— "Salem  records  do  not  show  that 
Edward  Bradway  ever  owned  a  home  or 
lot  on  the  North  side  of  Broadway  be- 
I  tween  tlie  wharf  and  Market  street." 
I  Still,  there  is  no  doubt  that  the  de- 
scendants of  Edward  Bradway  did  afte:'- 
ward  become  seized  of  the  very  property 
now  (after  the  lapse  of  so  many  years) 
ill  controversy,  which  finally  came  into 
the  possession  of  John  S.  Wood.  Esq.. 
of  Jericho.  Cumberland  county,  by  his 
marriage  with  Sarah  Ann  Bradway. 
daughter  of  Thomas  and  Isabella  ^Dun- 
lap  Bradway,  the  husband  lieing  a  son 
of  Thomas  Bradway.  .only  son  of  Aaron 
Bradway  by  his  second  wife.  Saraii 
Smith,  widow  of  John  Smith,  grandson 
of  John  Smith,  of  Smitn..-.d.  Aaron 
Bradway  was  a  grandson  of  Edward 
Biadway.  the  emigrant.  By  his  first  wife 
he  had  a  son,  Jo^^hua.  who  bought  the 
Hall  property,  at  the  foot  of  West 
Broadway  from  Joseph  Hall,  a  grandson 
of  William  Hall,  the  emigrant.  March 
2d,  1791.  So  just  one  hundred  years  after 
the  "Capitall  House"  was  built  it  thus 
passed  from  tl.e  Hall  to  tlie  Bradw:i\- 
family. 

The  late  Tliomas  Wood.,  of  tliis  Citv, 
son  of  John  S.  and  Sarali  Ann  M'ood. 
built  the  frame  dwelling  house  nn  tin- 
corner  of  Front  street  and  West  Broad- 
way, and  resided  there  several  years. 

Tlie  unusjal  circumstances  srrroundiii.« 
tli(»   lun-chfise  bv   Richard  Guy  from  Jolin 


l-'euwick,  in  1(575,  of  the  ten  thousaiul 
acre  tract  afterward  called  "Pile  Grove," 
with  inoiiex-  tiirnished  by  Thomas  Pyle, 
iiivdlved  tile  necessity  of  a  subsequent 
I<i;al  ii-aiisrei-  ui  which  we  will  pres- 
riitlx-  refer.  AVe  do  not  know  even  ap- 
liroximatelv-  when  tlie  latter  inimig'rated 
to  America,  but  may  be  guided  by  the 
following  "Return  of  Survey,"  June  20, 
KSL',  not  having  any  information  of  his 
movements,  during  the  intervening  seven 
.\ears.  fiom  the  iate  of  i)iircha.--e  \v 
proxy,  and  the  following  transaction, 
viz: — 

"16S2,  ,June  20.  Return  of  Survey  to 
Thomas  Pyle.  of  I^ondnn,  citizen  and 
upliolstei-er.  of  10,000  acres,  bought  by  him 
in  the  name  of  Richard  Guy.  of  the 
Parish  of  Stepney  Co.,  of  Middlesex, 
Cheesemonger,  who,  by  a  deed  of  trust, 
( onveyed  the  same  to  John  Eldridge, 
.loseph  Kemseley,  Richard  Noble.  Ed- 
ward Champneyes  and  Edmund  Warner, 
of  said  tract  7,905  a.  are  bounded  by 
Fenwick's  River.  Cannon's  Creek,  whicli 
.goes  through  part  of  it;  P.vle's  Mount. 
Masacksy,  alia.s  01dman"s.  alias  Berkely 
Creek.  Pyle's  Bounder  Creek  .the  bal- 
ance in  Necomusses  Neck.  between 
Necomusses"  run  now  called  Fenwick's 
Grove  Run  and  Fenwick's  River"  (Fen- 
wick's Surveys  1676-1703) ;  also  by  a 
"Deed  of  Gift  from  Sarah,  wife  of 
Thomas  Pde.  of  Shadwell,  England,  up- 
holsterer, to  her  daughter.  Elizabeth 
Pile,  and  William  Hall,  both  of  Piles- 
grove,  jurisdiction  of  New  Salem,  for 
all  her  personal  estate,  and  her  title  to 
10.(X)0  acres  of  land,  on  condition  of  mak- 
ing certain  payments  to  Sarah  Canuoi>, 
the  mother,  son,  Ephraim  Pile,  daughter, 
Sarah  Gibson  ami  son-in-law,  Simon 
Gibson"  (dated  Jaiiuaiy  10th,  lti,S3-4)  also. 
viz:— 

"16S.">,  15th  d.  9th  m.  (Nov.)  Deed  of 
Gift  from  Sarah  Cannon,  of  New  Saler>i, 
widow,  to  hei'  daughter,  Sarah  Pile, 
of  Shadwell  Co.,  of  Middlesex,  (Eng- 
land) for  all  her  personal  property." 
(Salem    Wills.     A.     P    P    2-7.) 


"The  preceding  two  deeds  of  gifts,  so 
called  in  the  record,  are  evidently  in- 
tended to  be  last  wills  and  testaments." 

If  the  above  surmise,  of  the  compiler 
of  the  Archives,  together  with  the  asso- 
ciated dates  ai-e  correct,  Thos.  Pyle's  wife, 
Sarah,  did  not  emigrate  from  London  io 
West  Jersey,  unless  several  years  elapsed 
between  the  making  of  her  last  will  and 
testament  and  her  demise,  or  if  she  did, 
must  have  returned  to  England  before 
her  death,  which  we  infer  from  the  date 
of  the  inventory  of  her  estate  occurred 
in  March  1683-4,  although  the  "Deed  of 
Gift"  from  her  mother,  Sarah  Cannon, 
dated  November  15,  1685,  implies  that  slie 
was  living  at  that  time.  She  left  for 
those  times,  quite  a  considerable  per- 
sonal estate,  viz:—  "£290.11  incl.,  a  boy 
servant,  Richard  Wheat,  £7,  a  maid 
servant,  Mary  Harrington,  £7,  a  negro 
woman  £14,  43  oz.  of  plate,  £10.05,  an  old 
watch  12s.  and  debt?  (all  desparate)"  said 
to  be  due  from  some  of  the  most  re- 
spectable and  perfectly  responsible  citi- 
zens of  Fenwick's  Colony  such  as— 
"Samuel  Hedge,"  "Richard  TindaU." 
"Major  Fenwick,"  "Samuel  Carpenter," 
and  many  others,  indicating  another  in- 
stance of  gross  inaccuracy  in  tlie  publish- 
ed   chronicles    we    possess. 

In  her  "Deed  of  Gift'  'to  her  daughter, 
Elizabeth,  and  William  Hall,  she  speak.s 
of  "her  personal  estate  and  her  title  to 
10,000  acres  of  land."  Are  we  to  infer, 
from  this  in  connection  with  the  indirect 
purchase  by  Richard  Guy,  that  she  was 
the  original  and  actual  owner  of  part 
if  not  all  of  the  Pilesgrove  estate  ?  If 
she  died  in  1683-4,  which  she  evidently 
d:d  not,  but  which  the  inventory  of  her 
property,"  made  by  Com.  Braithwaite 
and  Samuel  Hedge,"  both  residents  of 
the  Colony  would  imply,  her  husband 
survived  her  more  than  twelve  years, 
he    left   a   small    personal   estate,    viz:— 

"£49.16.11  incl  books  £1.  a  gold  ring 
IS.  s.  made  by  Jona  Beere  and  Samuel 
Hedge"  all  of  which  together  with  his 
real    pi-operty    he    left    to    his    daughter, 


FAMOUS    OLD    OAK 
West     Broadwaky,     Salem,     New     Jersey 


Elizabeth      Hall."      Sou-in-law,      William  jj 
Hall,   executor."     (Salem  Wills  A.   P.  173.)  |j 

Ephraim  Pyle.  the  son,  died  August  i 
iT).  1685,  about  one  year  and  seven  months 
after  what  we  suppose  to  have  been  the 
date  of  the  demise  of  his  mother.  "Ad- 
ministration on  the  estate  granted  to  his 
brother-in-law,  William  Hall,"  who  about 
one  pear  perviously,  i  e.— May  21st,  1684. 
had   married   his   sister,   Elizabeth    Pyle. 

There  was  beside  the  latter,  another 
(laughter,  Sarah  Gibson,  wife  of  Simon 
Gibson,  who  also  had  a  claim  by  the 
•"Indenture  Tripartite"  of  1675.  June  16th. 
in  which  wa.s  awarded  "one-half  to  the 
use  and  behoff  of  Simon  Gibson,  of  the 
Parish  of  St.  Paul,  Shadwell  Co.,  of 
Middlesex,  carpenter.  du'Mng  the  life  of 
hi.s  wife,  Sarah;  the  othei  half  in  trust 
for  said  Thomas  Pyle  and  wife  during 
their  lives,  the  whole  to  go  finally  to 
Ephraim,  son  and  Elizabeth,  daughter, 
of  said  Thomas  and  Sarah  Pyle." 
As  we  find  no  further  reference  to  Sarah 
Gibson,  we  conclude  that  her  husband, 
Simon,  survived  her  and  therefore  her 
share  of  the  property  according  to  the 
provisions  of  the  "Indenture  Tripartite," 
fiuoted  above.  Ephraim  being  dead,  re- 
verted to  her  sister,  Elizabeth  Hall.  (New 
Jersey   Colonial   Documents,    Salem   No.l.) 

The  only  example  of  the  hand  writing 
of  Ephraim  Pyle,  whose  premature  death 
we  have  noted,  is  his  autograph,  spelled 
"Epraim  Pyle."  as  witness  to  the  nun- 
cupative wnll  of  Thomas  Knowles,  of 
New  Salem,  planter,  wherein  he  devises 
lo  Elizabeth  Pyle.  .spinster,  as  a  tri- 
bute doubtless  to  her  worth,  virtues,  and 
possible  personal  attractions,  the  singular 
U  gacy  of  "a  heifer  in  the  hands  of 
Charles  Bagley  and  makes  James  Nevill 
and  Sarah  Pyles.  executors."  The  in 
ventory  of  his  personal  estate,  amounting 
to  £17.7.2.  made  by  Thomas  "^'oodruff. 
SheriiT.  and  Edward  Lumley.  planter,  is 
dated  April  2.  1682,  and  from  the  fact 
that  Sarah  Pyles"  was  one  of  the  execii- 
toi-s.  we  mu?t,  regardless  of  our  former 
I  jiinion— that     she    remained     in     England 


declining  to  emigrate— in  view  of  the 
above  circumstances,  admit  that  she  was, 
nevertehless,  at  that  particular  time, 
"in    propria    persona,"    here. 

The  last  hour  of  Knowles,  within  the 
mortuary  chamber  of  his  humble  home, 
as  he  uttered  the  words  disposing  of  his 
small  estate,  to  which  "Epraim  Pyle"  af- 
fixed his  signature  as  witness,  must  in- 
deed have  been  a  time  lugubrious 
Imagination  can  transport  us  also  there, 
to  mingle  with  the  faithful  friends  gath- 
ered around  him,  and  hear  him  with  lal- 
tering  accents  utter  his  last  wishes.  A 
mysterious  influence  pervades  the  room, 
which  tells  us  that  spirits  uncanny  are 
hovering  near— are  already  there.  >'t 
seems  a  haunted  spot. 
"O  er    all    there    hung    the    shadow    of    a 

fear. 
A    sense    of    mystery    the    spirit    daunted. 
And  said  as  plain  as  whisper  in  the  ear. 
The    place     is    haunted." 

The  Parcae,  the  weird  sisters,  the  un- 
relenting fates  have  come  and  now  are 
busy    with    their    horrid   work: — 

"Sororem    fila    trium    patiunter    atra." 

Although  invisible  we  are  aware  of 
their  presence,  the  painful  concentration 
of  the  exalted  sense  rendering  there 
movements  audible,  when,  the  pen  of 
the  scrivener  ceasing,  and  the  frigid  ton- 
gue of  the  expiring  mortal  forever  silent, 
we  iiear  the  clashing  shears  of  Atropos 
sever  the  black  worsted  cord  of  sorrow, 
which  frees  the  spirit,  escaping  from  th,-r 
desolation  and  unavailing  grief  it  leaves 
beh'nd.  curable  only  by  the  antidotal  medi- 
caments of  resignation,  of  time,  and  of 
eternal     hope. 

It  's  indeed  a  dark  and  gloomy  hour, 
without  one  lucid  ray,  save  when  tho 
anticipated  arrival  of  the  heifer,  led  by 
the  hand  of  the  ubiquitous  Bagley,  sheds 
a  gleam   of  humor  across  the  final  scen.^. 

On  opening  this  "Old  Deed"  and  read- 
ing its  contents,  one  cannot  fail  to  real- 
'ze.  the  comparative  permanence  and 
ms^'ability  of  inorganic  matter  and  or- 
gfinir    life.      Coming    down    through    eight 


generations  of  my  family,  without  espe- 
cial care,  until  witliin  a  few  years,  aftei 
the  lapse  of  more  than  two  hundred  and 
thirty  years,  it  is  apparently  in  as  good 
a  state  of  preservation  as  when  it  was 
written,  signed,  conveyed  and  witnessed 
in  1675.  But  where  are  the  hearts  and 
hands  of  those  twelve  men,  whose  mem- 
ory is  embaaned  within  the  body  of  the 
Instrument  ?  Long  since  crumbled  intc 
dust.  Those  liearts  which  then  responded 
to  the  impulses  of  expectation  and  of 
h.ope,  those  brave  hands,  whose  deft  pre- 
hensile fingers  with  psycologic  transmu- 
tation changed  intuition  into  visible  form 
and   made   it   stay,    for  centuries,    save   in 


tlieir  progeny  and  finished  work,  hava 
vanished  from  the  scenes  of  life,  utterly 
disappeared  and  "like  (an)  insubstan- 
tial pageant  faded  left  not  a  rack  be- 
hind" and  were  it  not  for  this  treasured 
manuscript,    miglit   be    forgotten    now. 

But  though  they  are  gone,  one  of  their 
creations,  this  sheepskin  with  is  written 
message,  a  legacy  of  long  ago,  rescued 
by  their  cunning  art  from  disintegration 
and  decay,  still  lives,  as  it  were  eter- 
nal, alike  defying  and  escaping  tlie  ro- 
dent "tooth  of  time  and  razure  of  obli- 
vion." 

E.     S.    S. 
Salem,   N.   jersey,   December  3d,  1908. 


W$^i(