Skip to main content

Full text of "On the sclerotic ring of the eyes of birds and reptiles"

See other formats


IRLF. 


948 

Ass  '       B  3  8" 


ON  THE 


SCLEROTIC    RING 


OF 


THE    EYES 


f 


OF 


BIRDS  AND  REPTILES, 


BY 


THOMAS  IALLIS,  ESQ. 


YORK  : 

H.    SOTHERAN,   BOOKSELLER,    CONEYSTREET. 
1855. 


THE  LIBRARY 

OF 

THE  UNIVERSITY 
OF  CALIFORNIA 

PRESENTED  BY 

PROF.  CHARLES  A.  KOFOID  AND 
MRS.  PRUDENCE  W.  KOFOID 


M366951 


A58 


[Extract  from   the    "Proceedings"    of  the   Yorkshire 
Philosophical  Society^ 


On  the  Sclerotic  Ring  of  the  Eyes  of  Birds  and  Reptiles. — 
By  THOMAS  ALLIS,  ESQ.     Read  April,  1849.* 

When  I  began  the  preparation  of  Bird's  Skeletons,  I  was  not 
aware  that  their  eyes  were  furnished  with  this  bony  apparatus, 
and  when  first  informed  of  the  fact,  it  was  mentioned  only  with 
reference  to  rapacious  birds. 

By  accident  the  sclerotic  bones  of  an  Eagle  Owl  became 
detached  from  each  other  in  consequence  of  over  boiling  ;  I  was 
induced  to  articulate  them  together  and  to  count  them ;  and  on 
finding  it  stated  in  Cuvier's  Comp.  Anatom.  that  the  usual 
number  of  these  bones  was  twenty,  whereas  in  the  bird  in  ques- 
tion they  only  amounted  to  fifteen,  I  was  led  to  proceed  further, 
and  after  dissecting  minutely  the  sclerotic  ring  of  upwards 
of  seventy  birds,  taken  from  every  great  division,  the  greatest 
number  I  have  found  in  any  instance  is  seventeen ;  and  the 
smallest  number  eleven ;  except  in  a  single  instance,  in  which 
the  ring  is  composed  of  but  one  single  bone.  I  have  sixty-seven 
species  on  these  tablets  :  of  these,  the  ring  consists  in  one 
instance  of  only  a  single  bone  ;  three  have  eleven  bones  ;  eight 
have  twelve  ;  twelve  have  thirteen ;  twenty  have  fourteen ; 
nineteen  have  fifteen  ;  two  have  sixteen  ;  and  two  have  seven- 
teen. I  have  consulted  several  authors,  but  have  met  with  little 
respecting  either  the  bones  themselves  or  their  functions ;  the 
little  I  have  found  is  contained  in  the  following  extracts  ;  after 
giving  which,  I  shall  mention  concisely  those  particulars  in 
which  the  results  of  my  own  researches  differ  from  the  state- 
ments made  by  these  authors. 

Blumenbach  Comp.  Anat.,  296,  says,  "  the  eyes  of  birds  of 

*  This  paper  was  composed  in  1837,  and  in  that  year  was  read  to  the  British 
Association  assembled  in  Liverpool.  At  the  request  of  the  Yorkshire  Philosophical 
Society,  in  whose  Museum  the  Allisian  Collection  of  Comparative  Osteology  is 
preserved,  it  was  read  to  that  Society  in  1849.  In  the  interval  between  these  dates, 
Mr.  Allis  had  the  satisfaction  of  shewing  to  the  authors  of  that  splendid  publication, 
4  The  Dodo  and  its  Kindred,'  that  their  inference  of  the  place  of  Dodo  among  tho 
Columbidse  was  entirely  confirmed  by  the  independent  evidence  of  its  Sclerotic 
Bones.— (Note  by  Editors.) 


2 

prey  have  a  peculiar  form  ;  which  is  similar  to  that  of  the 
chalice  or  cup  used  in  the  communion  service ;  the  cornea  which 
is  very  convex  forms  the  bottom  of  the  cup,  and  the  posterior 
segment  of  the  sclerotica  resembles  the  cover;  this  peculiar 
form  arises  from  the  curvature  and  length  of  the  bony  plates, 
which,  as  in  all  other  birds,  occupy  the  front  of  the  sclerotica, 
lying  close  together  and  overlapping  each  other;  these  bony 
plates  form  in  general  a  slighty  convex  ring ;  being  long  and 
curved  in  the  Accipitres,  they  form  a  concave  ring,  which  gives 
the  whole  eye-ball  the  above-mentioned  form." 

Dr.  Albers  observes,  "  that  the  orbit  is  very  imperfect  in 
birds,  and  that  this  bony  ring  may  supply  the  deficiency." 

Carus  says,  "  the  firm  and  elastic  sclerotica  of  birds,  the 
structure  of  which  has  been  very  accurately  examined  by 
Albers,  consists  of  three  laminae,  between  the  outer  and  middle 
ones  of  which  the  osseous  circle  is  inserted  anteriorly.  This 
structure,  which  already  exists  in  some  fishes  and  amphibia,  is 
common  to  all  the  species  of  birds  ;  it  is  composed  of  from 
fifteen  to  seventeen  oblong  quadrangular  laminae  of  bone,  with 
the  corners  rounded  off;  forming  in  some  cases  simply  a  smooth 
circle,  in  others  a  more  or  less  prominent  cylinder ;  in  Owls  this 
cylinder  is  particularly  long." 

Cuvier  says,  {f  the  sclerotic  of  birds  is  divided  into  laminae, 
the  interval  of  which  receives  a  circle  of  small,  thin,  hard, 
oblong  bones,  which  lie  over  each  other  like  tiles,  and  which 
give  to  the  anterior  part  of  the  eye  a  great  degree  of  firmness 
and  a  fixed  form.  These  ossicula  are  almost  flat  in  the  greater 
number  of  birds ;  in  which  they  form  only  an  annular  disk  of 
little  convexity ;  they  are  slightly  arched  and  concave  externally 
in  the  Horned  Owl,  in  which  they  form  a  short  tube  in  the  form 
of  a  truncated  cone ;  they  are  usually  twenty  in  number." 
Cuvier  further  states,  that  "  the  sclerotica  determines  the  shape 
of  the  eye  ;  it  can  therefore  be  really  soft  and  flexible  only  in 
animals  that  have  the  eye  nearly  globular ;  that  is  to  say  in 
man  and  quadrupeds ;  because  their  sclerotic  assumes  of  itself 
that  shape,  in  consequence  of  the  nearly  uniform  resistance 
made  by  the  fluids  contained  in  the  eye  to  the  pressure  of  its 


coats  ;  but  in  all  animals  that  have  the  eye  more  removed  from 
a  spherical  form,  as  the  Cetacea,  Fishes  and  Birds,  that  mem- 
brane is  supported  by  hard  accessory  parts ;  or  by  a  greater 
solidity  of  texture  and  a  more  considerable  thickness." 

In  a  Paper  in  the  third  vol.  of  the  Zoological  Journal, 
Wm.  Yarrell  says,  "  the  eyes  of  birds  are  much  larger  in  pro- 
portion than  those  of  quadrupeds,  and  exhibit  also  two  other 
peculiarities."  One  of  these  peculiarities  is  "  a  ring  of  thin 
bony  plates  enveloped  in  the  sclerotic  coat.  Comparative 
Anatomists  do  not  seem  to  be  agreed  as  to  the  means  by  which 
birds  obtain  their  powers  of  vision ;  whether  by  alteration  in 
the  form  or  situation  of  the  crystalline  lens,  or  by  both ;  either 
or  both  of  which,  the  greater  quantity  of  aqueous  humour 
which  birds  are  known  to  possess,  would  seem  to  facilitate,  and 
the  existence  of  a  muscle  attached  to  the  inner  surface  of  the 
bony  hoop  of  the  sclerotica  and  inserted  by  a  tendinous  ring  into 
the  internal  surface  of  the  Cornea,  as  shewn  by  Mr.  Cramptoii 
in  the  Annals  of  Philosophy  for  1813,  by  which  the  convexity 
of  the  Cornea  may  be  altered,  gives  a  still  greater  scope  of 
action."  He  afterwards  says,  "  the  external  convex  form  of 
the  Golden  Eagle  will  be  found  to  extend  through  all  the 
species  of  every  genus  of  British  birds,  except  the  Owls,  in  all 
of  which  it  is  concave." 

In  speaking  of  the  sclerotic  bones  generally,  Dr.  Buckland, 
page  174,  of  his  Bridgewater  Treatise,  says,  "  In  living  animals 
these  bony  plates  are  fixed  in  the  exterior  or  sclerotic  coat  of 
the  eye,  and  vary  its  scope  of  action  by  altering  the  convexity 
of  the  cornea  ;  by  their  retraction  they  press  forward  the  front 
of  the  eye  and  convert  it  into  a  microscope  ;  in  resuming  their 
position  when  the  eye  is  at  rest,  they  convert  it  into  a  telescope." 

As  regards  the  form  of  the  bony  ring,  Blumenbach  certainly 
is  not  correct  when  he  says,  that  "  in  the  accipitres  it  is  con- 
cave externally ;"  that  is  only  true  of  the  nocturnal  accipitres, 
as  stated  by  my  friend  Wm.  Yarrell ;  nor  is  the  latter  correct  in 
saying  that  every  species  of  British  birds  has  it  convex  like  the 
Golden  Eagle.  The  Woodcock,  Spoonbill,  Caprimulgus,  and 
some  others  have  merely  a  flat  and  narrow  ring  towards  the 


external  edge  of  the  eye,  and  certainly  no  degree  of  convexity 
at  all  approaching  to  that  of  the  Golden  Eagle.  The  shape  of 
the  individual  bones  is  so  various  that  it  cannot  he  given  in  any 
general  term ;  the  external  edge  of  the  bones  is  in  most 
instances  beautifully  serrated ;  but  the  serration  is  not  visible 
in  the  bony  ring ;  but  in  the  separate  bones  which  were  boiled 
until  the  extraneous  matter  would  wipe  off  easily  with  a  cloth, 
it  is  very  perceptible  ;  the  rings  would  separate  if  boiled  to  the 
same  extent,  and  in  cleaning  them  with  a  knife  I  have  not 
been  able  to  preserve  the  serrations. 

As  regards  the  structure  of  the  rings,  the  bones  generally 
overlap  each  other,  there  being  a  depression  on  the  under  side 
of  one  bone,  and  a  precisely  corresponding  one  on  the  upper 
side  of  its  neighbour,  so  that  when  overlapping  each  other,  they 
present  nearly  an  even  surface,  both  exteriorly  and  interiorly ; 
having  one  bone  with  both  depressions  on  its  inner  surface,  and 
forming  an  exterior  key  to  the  arch,  and  one  having  both 
depressions  on  its  outer  surface,  and  forming  an  internal  key  ; 
in  some  instances  there  are  two  external  keys  ;  and  in  several 
instances,  instead  of  one  bone  overlapping  the  other,  they  inter- 
lock into  each  other  in  a  curious  and  beautiful  manner. 

I  take  it  for  granted  that  the  principal  function  of  these 
sclerotic  rings  is,  as  stated  by  Cuvier,  to  preserve  that  peculiar 
form  of  the  eye  which  is  adapted  to  the  nature  and  wants  of  the 
animals.  But  in  nature's  laboratory  there  is  no  prodigality  or 
waste  of  power  ;  and  these  rings  having,  in  the  first  place, 
fulfilled  the  duties  for  which  they  were  primarily  created,  still 
subserve  the  wants  of  the  animal  in  other  ways,  and  under  cir- 
cumstances and  in  situations  to  which  those  classes  of  animals 
which  have  not  such  rings  are  not  exposed. 

I  allude  to  their  use  as  a  defence  and  protection  to  the  eye. 
On  examining  these  specimens  it  will  be  found  that  those  birds 
which  are  peculiarly  pugnacious ;  those  which  have  a  peculiarly 
rapid  flight ;  and  those  which,  from  the  extended  variation  of 
altitude  at  which  they  fly,  are  exposed  to  great  or  very  unequal 
degrees  of  atmospheric  pressure,  have  the  sclerotic  rings  of 
larger  size,  of  more  convex  form,  and  the  individual  bones  of 


greater  strength  than  the  weak-billed  or  low-flying  birds  ;  and 
the  same  remark  holds  good  with  the  water  birds,  on  comparing 
those  that  take  their  food  on  or  near  the  surface  of  the  water, 
with  those  that  dive ;  among  which  class  are  to  be  found  the 
strongest  bones. 

Another  subsidiary  use,  is  that  of  altering  the  convexity  of 
the  Cornea  as  mentioned  by  Dr.  Buckland. 

I  have  eight  specimens  of  diurnal  Rapacidse ;  the  Golden 
Eagle  affords  an  example  of  a  bony  ring  of  greatly  increased 
strength  in  a  bird  that  takes  a  lofty  flight  and  follows  its  prey 
with  great  velocity :  it  is  a  smaller  bird  than  the  white  tailed 
Eagle,  yet  the  bony  ring  is  larger,  more  convex,  and  the  indivi- 
dual bones  much  stronger.  The  King  Vulture  and  Lammer- 
geyer  have  the  rings  stronger  than  their  congeners ;  and  the 
Secretary  also  has  it  very  strong,  but  with  its  habits  of  flight  I 
am  unacquainted ;  of  this  series,  three  have  fourteen  bones, 
four  has  fifteen,  and  one  has  sixteen. 

Here  are  five  specimens  of  Owls ;  two  belong  to  the  great 
Horned  Owl :  one  set  of  the  detached  bones  shews  the  upper, 
the  other  set  the  under  surface  of  these  bones  ;  the  principal 
use  of  the  elongated  tube  appears  to  be,  to  bring  the  eye  beyond 
the  loose  feathers  of  the  head;  if  the  bones  were  no  longer 
than  in  the  generality  of  birds,  the  eyes  would  be  so  buried  in 
the  feathers  that  the  bird  would  only  be  able  to  see  objects 
straight  before  it.  The  bones  of  the  Barn  Owl  are  not  larger 
than  those  of  the  little  Scops,  though  the  bird  itself  is  nearly 
three  times  as  large  ;  they  are  not  required  to  be  so  long  in  the 
Barn  Owl  on  account  of  the  large  circular  disk  of  close  and 
short  feathers  that  surrounds  each  eye.  The  bones  of  the  Owls, 
instead  of  being,  as  stated  in  general  terms  by  Cuvier,  hard, 
flat  and  thin,  are  very  soft  and  porous ;  as  is  also  the  case  in 
those  of  the  Caprimulgidse,  and  those  of  the  great  Horned  Owl 
are  also  of  considerable  thickness. 

I  have  seven  specimens  of  Gallinidse  ;  one  of  these  has 
thirteen  bones  ;  four  have  fourteen  ;  one  has  fifteen  ;  and  one 
has  seventeen  ;  the  ring  in  most  of  these  is  strong. 

Of  Columbidec,  I  have  three  specimens,  each  of  which  has 


G 

eleven  bones  :  the  bones  are  strongest  in  the  rapid  flying 
Carrier  Pigeon,  though  the  Crowned  Pigeon  is  three  times  its 
size.  The  ring  of  the  Dove  is  small  and  the  bones  feeble. 

I  have  a  specimen  of  each  of  the  Struthious  birds ;  the 
Ostriches  have  each  fifteen  bones  ;  the  Cassowary  and  Emew 
thirteen  each ;  the  latter  affords  a  beautiful  example  of  the 
interlocking  of  the  bones  into  each  other. 

I  have  nine  specimens  of  Grallse  :  of  these,  one  is  imperfect ; 
one  has  thirteen  bones  ;  five  have  fourteen ;  and  two  have 
fifteen.  In  the  soft-billed  birds  of  this  class  the  rings  are  small 
and  feeble,  and  larger  in  the  sharp-billed  specimens,  though  not 
so  strong  in  these  as  in  some  other  classes. 

Of  Scansorial  birds,  I  have  seven  specimens  :  of  these,  five 
have  twelve  bones,  and  two  have  thirteen.  The  Parrot,  Macaw 
and  Cockatoo  have  the  rings  particularly  small  and  feeble ; 
owing,  I  presume,  to  the  skulls  of  the  Psittacidse  being  provided 
with  perfect  bony  orbits,  which,  I  believe,  no  other  class  of  birds 
possess.  The  Woodpecker  has  the  ring  as  strikingly  large ; 
indeed  it  has,  with  only  one  exception,  a  larger  portion  of  the 
eye  protected  by  the  sclerotic  ring  than  any  other  bird  I  have 
met  with  in  proportion  to  its  size,  and  as  I  find  nothing  in  its 
mode  of  flight,  or  in  the  altitude  at  which  it  flies  to  make  it 
require  this  etxra  protection,  I  am  induced  to  think  that  it  is 
intended  to  protect  the  eye  from  injury  from  the  small  chips  of 
wood  which  it  scatters  in  all  directions  when  searching  for  its 
insect  prey,  or  boring  the  tree  for  the  construction  of  its  nest. 

Here  are  seven  specimens  of  swimming  birds  :  one  has 
twelve  bones ;  one  fourteen ;  four  have  fifteen ;  and  one  has 
sixteen.  The  Ducks,  Geese  and  Swans  which  seek  their  food 
at  or  near  the  surface  of  the  water,  have  the  rings  remarkably 
weak  and  small ;  while  the  Gulls,  which  descend  into  the  water 
with  some  degree  of  force,  have  them  considerably  stronger. 

I  have  ten  specimens  of  diving  birds,  including  the  Pelican, 
which  though  not  strictly  a  diving  bird,  I  have  included  in  this 
group  on  account  of  its  affinity  with  the  Gannet ;  of  these,  two 
have  twelve  bones  ;  three  have  thirteen  ;  three  have  fourteen ; 
and  two  have  fifteen.  In  the  Pelican,  which  takes  its  food 


near  the  surface,  we  find  merely  a  feeble  annular  disk  ;  while 
the  other  birds  of  the  group  have  the  ring  very  strong  and 
convex :  the  Gannet,  which  takes  its  prey  by  descending  per- 
pendicularly from  a  considerable  height,  with  great  force  into 
the  sea,  has  the  individual  bones  stronger  than  any  other  bird  I 
have  met  with  : — the  true  divers,  (which  dive  from  the  surface 
to  a  considerable  depth  after  their  prey)  have  their  ring  very 
strong  and  convex,  though  the  individual  bones  are  much 
weaker  than  in  the  Gannet.  The  Guillemot,  Razor-bill  and 
Sea  Parrot,  also  have  the  ring  very  convex,  especially  the  latter. 
Here  are  ten  specimens  of  Passerine  birds :  two  have  thirteen 
bones ;  five  have  fourteen ;  one  fifteen ;  one  uncertain ;  and  one 
(the  Podargus  Humeralis)  differs  from  all  other  instances  I 
have  met  with ;  the  bony  ring  being  composed  of  one  single 
bone,  instead  of  a  series  of  plates.  The  European  Night  Jar 
has  a  very  weak  ring  without  any  convexity ;  while  its  Austra- 
lian congener  has  the  ring  of  considerable  size ;  though  the  bone 
itself  is  of  a  soft  and  porous  texture  like  the  Owls.  The  Swift 
has  the  ring  larger,  stronger  and  much  more  convex  than  any 
other  bird  at  all  approaching  its  own  size.  The  Kingfisher's  is 
also  large  for  the  size  of  the  bird ;  and  the  bones  of  the  Hum- 
ming-bird are  also  strong. 


Of  Reptiles,  Cuvier  says,  (Comp.  Anatom.  translation,  page 
396,)  ee  There  are  similar  laminae  in  the  sclerotic  of  the 
Chameleon  and  several  other  Lizards ;  but  they  do  not  form 
the  anterior  disk  of  the  eye ;  but  merely  surround  the  lateral 
part."  Here  are  bones  of  two  species  of  Turtle  and  three 
species  of  Lizards ;  Serpents  and  Frogs  appear  destitute  of 
them.  The  bones  of  the  Turtle  are  less  symmetrical  than  those 
of  birds  or  Lizards,  and  form  a  nearly  flat  disk,  having  but  little 
convexity. 

Out  of  three  species  of  Lizard,  which  are  all  I  have  examined, 
and  of  which  the  Chameleon  is  one,  in  two  cases  the  ring,  in 
opposition  to  the  statement  of  Cuvier,  does  form  the  anterior 
disk  of  the  eye,  and  that  as  completely  as  in  any  class  of  birds  : 


8 

in  the  Iguana,  these  bones  (from  which  the  figure  in  Dr.  Buck- 
land's  Bridge  water  treatise  was  taken)  are  remarkably  broad  at 
their  inner  edge,  and  overlap  each  other  to  a  greater  extent  than 
I  have  observed  in  any  birds,  thereby  greatly  increasing  the 
strength  of  the  convex  ring ;  the  external  edge  forms  a  kind  of 
pedestal  or  foot;  in  birds  the  external  edge  is  generally  the 
broadest.  The  Chameleon  has  the  bones  of  the  same  form  as 
the  Iguana,  but  the  pedestal  is  less  produced ;  the  ring  is  very 
strong;  and  to  increase  still  further  the  strength  of  the  eye's 
defence,  the  bones  are  covered  with  the  external  skin  of  the 
animal,  leaving  only  the  pupil  exposed.  The  Gecko  has  the 
ring  of  very  slight  texture,  and  it  merely  surrounds  the  lateral 
part  of  the  eye,  as  described  by  Cuvier ;  the  single  bones  (of 
which  I  have  only  preserved  one  specimen)  are  very  slight,  and 
from  back  to  front  exhibit  a  considerable  curve.  In  fossil 
Saurians,  these  bones  are  of  a  very  different  and  less  complex 
form  than  those  of  the  Iguana  or  Chameleon ;  they  appear  to  be 
merely  oblong  bones  of  uniform  shape,  forming  a  protection  to 
the  front  of  the  eye ;  they  are  beautifully  figured  as  placed  in 
the  head  of  the  Ichthyosaurus  in  Dr.  Buckland's  treatise ;  and 
I  have  here,  from  our  Geological  collection,  as  beautiful  an 
example  of  these  bones  in  situ. 

Note. — The  Paper  was  illustrated  by  anatomical  preparations  of  the  sclerotic 
rings.  Figures  of  many  examples  may  be  seen  in  the  plates  which  accompany  this 
volume. 


EXPLANATION   OF   THE    PLATES 


PLATE  4. 

Figure  1.     A  sclerotic  ring  of  the  Cassowary. 

la.  The  detached  bony  plate  forming  the  ring ;  being 
one  of  the  best  examples  of  the  manner  in  which 
these  bones  interlock  into  each  other. 

£.     Ring  of  the  African  Ostrich. 

3.  Ring  of  the  Golden  Eagle,  which  is  proportionally 

larger  and  the  bones  thicker  and  stronger  than 
the  author  has  found  in  any  other  bird  of  this 
family. 
3a.  Detached  bones  of  the  same. 

4.  Ring  of  the  White  Tailed  Eagle. 

5.  A  front  view  of  the  ring  of  the  Great  Horned  Owl ; 

in  which  the  bones  are  of  considerable  thickness, 

but  light  and  porous. 
5a.  A  side  view  of  the  same,  shewing  a  more  perfect 

tube  than  is  found  in  any  other  bird. 
5b.  Three  detached  bones  of  the  same. 

PLATE  5. 

Figure  1.  Sclerotic  ring  of  the  Norfolk  Plover;  which  is 
proportionally  larger  than  in  any  other  known 
instance. 

2.  Ring  of  the  Spoonbill ;  very  small  and  feeble. 

3.  Ring  of  the  Crane. 

4.  Ring  of  the  Wild  Goose  ;  which  is  proportionally 

one  of  the  smallest. 


Figure  5.  Ring  of  the  Herring  Gull,  considerably  larger  than 
in  the  Wild  Goose,  though  the  bird  is  but  little 
more  than  a  third  its  size  and  weight. 

6.  Ring  of  the  Gannet. 

6a.  Two  detached  bones  of  the  same. 

6£.  A  section  of  one  of  the  bones  to  shew  its  thickness ; 
in  this  bird  the  bones  are  thicker,  more  compact, 
and  stronger  than  in  an  any  other  known  instance. 

7.  Ring  of  the  Pelican,  a  much  larger  bird  than  the 

preceding. 

8.  Ring  of  the  Black-throated  Diver,  which  is  large 

and  strong. 
8a.  Detached  bones  of  the  same. 

9.  Ring  of  the  Red-throated  Diver,  which  though  a 

larger  bird  than  the  preceding,  has  the  ring  more 
feeble  and  smaller;  indicating  that  it  takes  its 
food  nearer  the  surface  of  the  water. 
9#.  Detached  bones  of  the  same. 

10.  Ring  of  the  Sea  Parrot ;  which  covers  a  larger  por- 

tion of  the  eye  than  in  any  other  aquatic  bird ; 
and  acquires  greatly  increased  strength  from  the 
extent  to  which  the  bones  overlap  each  other. 
100.  Detached  bones  of  the  same. 

11.  Ring  of  the  Domestic  Fowl. 

12.  Ring  of  the  Collared  Dove,  which  like  all  the  other 

Columbidae  which  have  come  under  the  author's 
notice,  consists  of  11  bony  plates  ;  the  smallest 
number  met  with  in  any  class  of  birds ;  the 
extinct  Dodo  being  the  only  bird  with  the  like 
number. 

13.  Ring  of  the  Wood  Grouse. 

14.  Ring  of  the  Green  Woodpecker,  which  is  larger 

and  covers  a  much  greater  portion  of  the  eye, 
than  in  any  other  scansorial  bird. 

15.  Ring  of  the  Blue  Macaw,  a  bird  more  than  twelve 

times  the  size  of  the  Woodpecker,  though  with  a 
much  smaller  ring. 


Figure  16.    Ring  of  the  Lemon-crested  Cockatoo,  which  is  like 
the  Macaws,  very  small. 

17.  Ring  of  the  Toucan,  a  hird  not  a  third  part  the 

size  of  the  preceding,  but  which  has  a  much 
larger  ring. 

18.  Ring  of  the  Touraco  or  Plaintain  Eater. 

19.  Ring  of  the  European  Night  Jar  ;    the  bones  are 

soft  and  the  ring  is  very  feeble. 

20.  Ring  of  the  Swift,  proportionally  one  of  the  largest 

and  strongest. 

PLATE  4. 

REPTILES. 

Figure  6.     Sclerotic  ring  of  the  Iguana. 

6a.  Two  detached  bones ;  the  outer  edge  of  which 
forms  a  kind  of  pedestal,  contrary  to  what  is 
found  in  birds,  where  the  outer  edge  is  generally 
the  broadest ;  in  the  present  case  the  ring  is 
much  strengthened  from  the  extent  to  which  the 
bones  overlap  each  other  in  consequence  of  this 
peculiarity  in  their  form. 

7.  A  front  view  of  the  ring  of  the  Gecko,  which  in 

this  surrounds  the  eye,  as  described  by  Cuvier, 
and  covers  scarcely  any  part  of  the  anterior  por- 
tion of  the  eye. 
7a,  A  side  view  of  the  same  ring. 

8.  Ring  of  the  Chameleon ;  which  covers  the  whole 

surface  of  the  front  of  the  eye  except  the  pupil, 
and  shews  the  smallest  aperture  of  any  known 
sclerotic  ring. 


fl  AT.  SIZE 


LC 


ii 


L2 


3< 


15 


17 


18 


S 


PI  4 


NA.T   SIZE 


/ 


a 


- 

"  . 


/:« 


14  DAY  USE 

RETURN  TO  DESK  FROM  WHICH  BORROWED 


This  book  is  due  on  the  last  date  stamped  below,  or 

on  the  date  to  which  renewed. 
Renewed  books  are  subject  to  immediate  recall. 


LD  21-1007n-6,'56 
(B9311slO)476 


General  Library 

University  of  California 

Berkeley