Skip to main content

Full text of "On slavery"

See other formats































oh 
Ss 

s 
ve 


Shee 








oe) 
oe 
< 
ee 





| 
en) 
ee we 





9, 
Dries Y 

? 
5 Apes ee 
» 52 


phere is no escaping from the fact that one- -seventh 
part ‘of the people of the United States are slaves, and 
~ endure all the degradation and misery which are insepar- 
able from a state of slavery. There is the fact! Look 
ati itt “Phink of it. Is it your duty to consider the mat- 
q ter? They are your fellow-men, your fellow-countrymen, 
“native: Americans, many of them, doubtless, your fellow- 
‘Christians. Slavery constitutes a leading element of our 
social condition, and a prominent element of our national 
character. It is now so conspicuous, that no person on 
; the globe, who knows anything about our country, can 
& think of us, without having slavery as a part of the 


a5 aoe? 


> aye 
es pene ‘g oy 
eho ee 
9 


Soe ene ee i gt pee oe er Fae te ROR Mee 
a3 a: 
< Sade = 9 £ “ 











my 


_ image, before his mind. 

We cannot keep it out of our own thi oes will 
8 agitate: us, if we do not agitate it. Slavery controls our 
social life almost as absolutely as it controls our govern- 
“ment. We can hardly vote for a single candidate, for 
4 any. office whatever, from a President to a Pathmaster, 
- without raising some question about slavery. Hardly a 
- religious congregation, North or South, can choose or 
_ accept, or part with a pastor, without having his mind 
exercised. ies some ange connected with comma nor 


oan) 


J 








gh apne? 
od 





yay On SLAVERY. 


territory, as slaveholding States multiply, and as slave- 
holders acquire constantly a more complete control of the 
government and general church-polity of, the country, it 
is more dnd staotg inipossible for us‘te live’ and not con- 
sider and act ‘pon this question’ °°” ca 

Is it not plains that ‘there’{s a providence in all this ? 
We have a duty to perform, wé ate loaded with responsi- 
bility forourenslayed bréthren,as ‘well ‘ag fo® our kindred 
who hqld: Saves, And sb: Heavete has rightéously decreed 
that we shall think and act upon it. Truly, we ought 
not to avoid the subject. It is unworthy of Americans 
to shrink from inquiry as to our condition, our prospects, 
and our duty. Let us meet the subject like men. Truth 
will not harm us—certainly not if we obey it. Shame on 
the man who thinks or admits that the free institutions 
in which we glory, cannot stand the test of truth and free 
inquiry. : 

What is a slave ? 

_A slave is a person held in slavery. We are neyer to 
forget that the slaves are human beings. Their black 
dole plexion and degraded condition often incline us to 
overlook this fact. We talk about the African race, but 
the slaves are of the human race. If all other proofs 
were set aside, the unmistakable evidence that they par- 
take in the consequences of Adam’s fall, would settle the 
question. God selected their ancestors as one of the 
four men who were preserved in Noah’s Ark, to repeople 
the desolated earth, after the deluge, and Jesus Christ 
eame to seek them among the lost sheep for whose salva- 
tion he laid down his life. They are our brethren by 
descent from the same parent, by being found in the same 
general depravity, and by sharing in the mercy of the 
same Savior. ‘To deny the brotherhood of the slave, is 
to adopt the principles of the priest toward the man 


On SLAVERY. 3 


among thieves ; it is to possess the spirit of Cain, who 
_ would not be his brother’s keeper ; it is to deny God our 
Maker, and Christ our Savior. The people of the United 
States are precluded by their Constitution, from denying 
that negroes’ and even slaves are men, because it is re- 
quired that they shall be numbered in the census, and 
reckoned in the apportionment of Representatives, as 
«« three-fifths of all other PERSONS.” The slaveholders 
cannot raise this question, because they govern the coun- 
try through this representation of slaves, as persons. 

There is great meanness, as well as cruelty, in most of 
the discussions about race, by which people too often try 
to quiet their consciences in neglecting to consider this 
subject. The slaves are poor, they are dependent, they 
are subjected, they are helpless, and it is ‘cowardly to 
taunt them with that which they cannot help. ‘‘ Who- 
soever mocketh the poor reproacheth his Maker.” It is 
a fearful thing to reproach God. Consider also that the 
people of color are generally very sensitive on this sub- 
ject. very indignity, or unkindness, or ‘injury they 
experience, is like thrusting at an old sore, which has 
become preternaturally irritable by prolonged suffering. 
A large part, it is believed, a clear majority of the per- 
sons now held as slaves, are of mixed blood, and so 
partake of the pride of the Caucasian as well as the 
sensitiveness of the African blood; and, it is taught by 
physiologists, that this mixed race have the keenest sen- 
sibilities in the world. If we would make the case our 
own, or consider how tenderly we treat other classes, 
who are poor, sick, bereaved, or oppressed, and not by 
their own fault; and then, realize that the slaves do not 
suffer less by being used to it, but are even more sensi- 
tive to every injury the longer they endure it—we shall 
- then take up the subject in a proper view. 


4 On SLAverRy. 


Slavery is not.a natural relation, nor does it exist by 
any natural right, but can only be created by positive 
law—so all writers and all courts hold. Ifa man is law- 
fully a slave, it is because the law has made him so. 
We must, therefore, go to the law to find what slavery is 
by law. And here we find that the essential element is 
ownership of the person. A man’s wife or child is not 
his slave, although they are his own; the law gives him 
a property in their society and their services, which he 
may sue for in the courts, but not in their persons. The 
slave is his property as a chattel, in the same sense as 
his horse and his gun are property. Slavery, then, is 
human chattelhood. The law makes it this and nothing 
else. Take this away and you destroy slavery. You 
may substitute any other form of dependence or servi- 
tude, worse or better, but it is not slavery. The law of - 
South Carolina gives an express definition: ‘‘ Slaves 
shall be deemed, sold, taken, reputed, and adjudged in 
law, to be chattels, permanent in the hands of their 
owners and possessors, and their executors, administra- 
tors and assigns, to all interests, constructions and pur- 
poses whatsoever.”? And the law of Louisiana terribly 
describes the necessary legal consequences that flow from 
this condition of chattelhood: ‘A slave is one who is 
in the power of a master to whom he belongs. The 
-master may sell him, dispose of his person, his industry 
and his labor; he can do nothing, possess nothing, nor 
acquire anything but what belongs to his master.”’ It is 
surprising how unreasonably and_ pertinaciously ‘many 
people keep the real thing that constitutes slavery, out 
of sight, when they talk about slavery, or apologize for 
those who practise it. If they would have this thing before 
their minds, there is not a human being on earth who 
would not pronounce it ‘‘a stupendous wrong.” 


On Stavery. 5 


It is the plain intention of these laws to deprive the 
slave of every personal right, and to dehumanize him. 
There is no other despotism on earth which takes away 
all the rights of its subject. The abstract principles of 
the old Roman law are here carried to the extreme, with- 
out any of the actual limitations which obtained in Rome 
by the fact that the slaves were not regarded as a dis- 
tinct race, could be made valuable by education, could 
be freed without restraint, and they or their children 
could become citizens. There is no other slaveholding 
country which completely annihilates the rights and hopes 
of the slave. In the Spanish colonies, the slave has a 
right to obtain property and purchase his freedom. The 
American slave cannot even sue for the freedom that has 
been given him, but is dependent on some white person 
to sue in his behalf, so that there may not be even an 
implied acknowledgement that the slave has rights. 
There are, indeed, certain laws prohibiting the maiming 
or murdering of a slave, “unless by moderate correc- 
tion,’ but these laws are designed chiefly for the protec- 
tion of the property, or to preserve public morals, (like 
our laws against cruelty to animals), and they are of 
little practical use, because no colored person can testify 
against a white man, and the cruelties to slaves are, of 
course, committed on isolated plantations or in dwellings 
where none but slaves are present. There are some cases 
of white persons punished for wounding or murdering 
other people’s slaves, but no known case of a slaveholder 
hanged for the murder of his own slave. A solitary 
ease of execution was lately reported in a Southern pa- 
per, but it was expressly stated that the hanging was on 
account of some special circumstances in the case. 

There is this difference between cruelty to an animal 
and cruelty to a slave—that the slave is known to be a 


6 On SLAVERY. 


human being, whose will is capable of rising higher and 
higher in resistance to unjust power, while slavery re- 
quires, that he should be brought into absolute subjection 
to the will of his master. If aman has an unruly ox, 
or an unmanageable horse, it harms no one but himself ; 
but the whole slaveholding section would be convulsed if 
it should be known that there was a single slave who 
could not be subdued. Hence the measure of excessive 
punishment, or cruelty to a slave, is not the amount of 
torture inflicted, or the barbarous methods employed ; 
nothing is excessive or cruel, provided it is necessary, in 
order to subdue a refractory slave. It has been expressly 
decided by the courts, that the services of the slave ‘‘ can 
only be expected from one who has no will of his own, 
who surrenders his will in implicit obedience to the will - 
of another ;’’ that ‘‘such obedience is the consequence 
only of uncontrolled authority over the body ;” and that 
“the power of the master must be absolute, to render the 
submission of the slave perfect.’’ [2 Dev. N. ©. Re- 
ports, 263. | 

Although the laws thus deny the rights of human na- 
ture to the slave, the passions of lust and of vengeance, 
are not to be controlled by these enactments. People 
are provoked by the disobedience or carelessness of a 
slave, who would feel ashamed to be thrown into a rage 
by the waywardness of a horse. Those who are convers- 
ant among slaveholders, find them always a peculiarly 
irritable race, easily thrown into a towering passion, or 
rendered frantic with rage, even towards their equals in 
society, and especially towards mechanics and laborers. 
This is because their passions are accustomed to be ex- 
cited towards their slaves, and to be allowed their full 
scope of gratification without restraint. Unless human 
nature is annihilated in slayeholders as well as in slaves, 


~- 


On Suavery. 4" 


it is impossible but that the carrying on of such a system 
of slavery, over fifteen States, and three millions of en- 
slaved persons, must be attended by an indescribable 
amount of cruelty, beyond what can possibly exist in 
any other state of society on earth. 

The correctness of this inference is proved by the care 
which is taken to prevent the exposure to the world of 
the actual condition of things on the plantation. No man 
is allowed to explore those terrible secrets; to make in- 
quiries on the subject in a slaveholding State, would be 
dangerous ; unless the person inquiring will either take 
the word of the master as true, or otherwise show him- 
self a friend of the system. The condition of French 
exiles in Cayenne, or a Russian prisoner in Siberia, is not 
so concealed as that of slaves on the plantation, from the 
scrutiny of the world, or the censure of public opinion. 
The manner in which slaves who run away, are described 


in the newspaper advertisements, reveals something. The 


Presbyterian Synod, of Kentucky, in 1834, testified that 
«brutal stripes, and all the varied kinds of personal in- 
dignities, are not the only species of cruelty which slavery 
licenses.”’ 

It has been proved, by competent witnesses, that slaves 
are whipped with incredible severity ; are fastened down 
to the ground and whipped ; are hung up by the wrists, 
or even thumbs, and whipped ; are flayed with the lash, 
and then washed down with brine or red pepper-water ; 
are flogged, daily, for many days in succession; are 
flogged beyond measure, and kept to die unattended ; 
the son is compelled to flog his mother that bore him, 
the husband to flog his pregnant wife, the lover his mis- 
tress, in order more effectually to humble them ; they are 
cropped, their teeth drawn, their noses slit, their fingers 
or toes cut off; they are branded on the cheek or breast, 


8 On SLAVERY. 


with hot irons; made to work, loaded with iron collars 
and chains; compelled to stand and have knives thrown 
into their flesh, and then to draw out the knives and re- 
turn them to their tormentors, or to have the snapper of 
the driver’s whip cut out bits of skin and flesh from their 
bodies ; to eat and drink the most disgusting and unna- 
tural substances, to endure hunger and thirst, and naked- 
ness and cold; to be confined in postures that forbid 
sleep ; in short, it is hardly possible for the imagination to 
conceive so many forms of cruelty as have been invented 
and applied by the diabolical cruelty which siavery must 
necessarily engender. Said the North Carolina Supreme 


Court, in the case referred to: ‘We cannot allow the 


right of the master [to punish| to be brought into dis- 
cussion in the courts of justice. The slave, to remain a 
slave, must be made sensible that there is no appeal from 
his master. The danger would be great indeed, if the 
tribunals of justice should be called on to graduate the 


punishment appropriate to every temper and every de-— 


reliction of menial duty. No man can anticipate the 
many and aggravated provocations of the master, which 
the slave would be constantly stimulated, by his own 
passions or the instigation of others to give; or, the con- 
sequent wrath of the master, prompting him to bloody 
vengeance upon the turbulent traitor—a vengeance gen- 
erally practised with impunity, by reason of its privacy.” 
In establishing a relation the most provoking to human 
nature, the practice of cruelty is practically almost unre- 
strained. 

It is to be borne in mind, that mere law cannot make a 
man a slave ; it can only enact that he shall be a slave. 
Nature makes no slave, but the law takes him and puts 
him, ag raw material, into the hand of a master, to un- 


dergo the process of manufacture, by which he is made 


Own SLAVERY. 9 


an actual slave. And this process is the great wrong of 
slavery—the subjugation of the will—the annihilation of 
the moral power of the soul, wherein consists the radical 
distinction of man, as accountable—the essential image 
of God; which remains to our fallen nature, whereon 
rests the guilt of murder—*for in the image of God 
made he man.’’—Gen. ix: 6. 

The act by which a man is'transferred into a slave, is 
called F Overseerism,’’ because overseers are special 
practitioners of it; but, every slaveholder is obliged to 
learn it more or less, and to practise it if he lives sur- 
rounded by slaves. Said the Court, in the above case: 
‘©This dominion is essential to the value of slaves, as 
property, to the security of their master, and the public 
tranquility is greatly dependent on their subordination.”’ 
The slave has no legal right of will, and the business of 
the overseer is to suppress even the natural desire? to 
will—to eradicate the vitality of the moral nature, so that: 
it may never even attempt to rise from its prostration. 
The bodily tortures which savages inflict and endure 
without shrinking, the sufferings: and triumphs of mar- 
tyrs, prove that the spirit of man, when free, is capable 
of rising above almost every degree of physical suffer- 
ing, while the will is unbroken. The first lesson: in 
slavery, is the crushing of the will, so that it may never 
again re-assert its existence as an emanation from 
Deity. What language can describe the'torture of the 
soul, through which a man must pass before he is made 
into a slave? It is this amputation of the will, which 
old Homer refers to, where he says— 


“Whatever day 
Makes man a slave, takes half his worth away.” 


A few years ago, all Europe was horror-struck with 
the story that a youth named Casper Hauser, had) been 
1* 





TO On SLAvery. 


kept for twenty years, from his birth, in a state of abso- 
lute seclusion, so that not one of his powers or faculties 
had grown beyond those of infancy. The jurists taxed 
their learning for a definition of the crime, of thus swad- 
dling the life and powers of a human being, as the 
Chinese beauty bandages her feet, to suppress their na- 
tural development and expansion; and they called it the 
‘crime against the life of the soul.’’ Whether the story 
of Casper Hauser is true or false, the definition aptly de- 
scribes the guilt of those who exercise the functions of 
slavery, in subduing the will of a man until he is made 
into a slave. ‘To be thus despoiled of manhood, to long 
for its restoration ; to be conscious that it is the work of 
a fellow-man, feeling power and forgetting right, is doubt- 
less the crowning misery of the slave. 

Not only the laws, but even the moralists and religion- 
ists of the South, are compelled to recognize the practical 
annihilation of that voluntary principle in the soul of the 
slave, wherein consists his responsibility to the laws of 
God. Everywhere, the will of the master is considered 
a valid excuse for the slave. Hence the churches do not 
require slave parents to bring up their children in the 
nurture and admonition of the Lord, or slave children to 
honor their father and mother, or obey their parents in - 
the Lord, or slave husbands to cherish and honor their 
wives, or slave wives to submit to their husbands in the 
Lord, or slave ministers of the Gospel to go and preach 
as the Spirit of God may lead them, and his providence 
open a door of acceptance, for the Word. Its moralists 
argue that slaves have no right to complain at being 
separated from those they love, for they know the lia- 
bility of their condition, and have only themselves to 
blame for having formed such attachments—thus pro- 
fessedly subjecting every natural affection of the human 


On Savery. ll 


heart toitsiron hand. Its churches have no censures for 
those who sell their slaves under any pressure of neces- 
sity or convenience, even if the slaves sold are members of 
the same society, and have just partaken of the same holy 
communion with their master. No slave is excluded from 
fellowship, because living ina connection which is not 
hallowed by lawful marriage—for there is no such thing 
as lawful marriage to a slave. Nor is it held to be adul- 
tery, when a slave who has been sold to a great distance 
from husband or wife, forms a new connection of the 
same kind with that which has been broken. Slaves are 
customarily advertised for sale with the recommendation 
that they are pious, are exemplary Christians, are exhor- 
ters or preachers, and the like. Now if you ask any re- 
ligious person what made him a Christian, he will tell 
you it was the Spirit of God in him, or Christ within him, 
the hope of glory, and that his body is the temple of the 
Holy Ghost. He who should sell a slave decorated with 
earthly jewelry, would be sure to sell the jewels with the 
body ; and so he who sells the slave at a higher price for 
his religion, sells with his body the soul that has received 
the Holy Ghost, and, Judas-like, fills his purse with the 
price of his Savior. The general withholding from the 
slaves of the power to read the Scriptures, and the careful 
protestations of religious bodies that in promoting Christi- 
anity among slaves, they employ only ‘‘oral instruction,” 
is an admission of the comprehensive sweep of slave law. 
«The Bible is the religion of Protestants,’’ but slavery 
has reduced Romanists and Protestants to a level. Hun- 
dreds of thousands of dollars have been spent in giving 
the printed Bible and the means of mental cultivation to 
a handful of people in the Sandwich Islands, as the in- 
dispensible means of giving efficacy to the Christian faith 
among them ; while the religious world is exulting in the 


12 On. SLAVERY, 


extension of a system of measures for Christianizing the 
slaves, by withholding the Bible, putting out the eyes of 
the intellect, and forbidding the means of intellectual im- 
provement. Is it right for any of us to sit still and allow 
such a system to continue and grow, in our own country, 
without one word of remonstrance, or one effort to bring: 
about its extinction: by such. means as: God has furnished, 
and the Gospel of Christ ? 

Slavery not only annihilates the rights and extinguishes 
the soulhood of the slave; it destroys also the liberties . 
of the slaveholder. No man can be free in a slavehold- 
ing community. To allow freedom of the press and of 
speech, freedom of public assemblies.and public orators, 
freedom of conscience and. of religious action, is wholly 
incompatible with the continuance of slavery, and is not 
permitted in any slave State of this Union. In the out- 
break of the American Revolution, Lord Chatham said, 
in Parliament, that he rejoiced at the resistance of Amer- 
icans, because three millions of people in America who — 
were willing to be slaves, were enough to endanger the 
liberties of all the rest. The slaveholder may make any 
use he will, of his slave property, in the way of degra- 
dation and debasement, but. he cannot render his slave 
serviceable by entrusting him with arms, or by giving 
him the cage of his plantation, or by teaching him to read 
and write, and keep accounts as a clerk, or by. fitting» 
him, as the Romans used to do, for an amanuensis or a 
scrivener, or a teacher of his children. He cannot stim- — 
ulate the industry of the slave by securing him a share 
of his own earnings, for the benefit of himself or his 
family. Much as intelligence, and morality, and re- 
ligion increase the productive capacity of a man, the 
slaveholder is prohibited, either by law or the fear of 
such violence, from thus enhancing the money value of 


On SLAVERY. 13 


his property, by the means of cultivation which alone 
make men intelligent and pious. 

Neither the slaveholder nor the preacher, nor any other 
person, is allowed to question the rightfulness of slavery, 
or of any of its incidents. If aman should by any means 
be convinced that slaveholding is the life of slavery, and 
that the better man a slaveholder is in other respects, the 
more his example supports the system, that no man can 
be made to hold slaves but by his own act, as no man can 
be made to worship an idol but by his own consent, or 
by any reasoning should be brought to feel it his duty as 
a Christian, at the peril of his soul, to give freedom to 
his slaves—he is not allowed by law to doit. By a pe- 
culiar refinement, he is punished for doing it, not only by 
a fine or imprisonment, but more diabolically by seeing 
the slave he has emancipated, diabolically despoiled of 
his newly found freedom, seized by the sheriff and sold 
to the highest bidder, as a slave forever. Thomas Jeffer- 
son left it in his will, as a dying request to the Legisla- 
ture of his idolized Virginia, that his slaves (some of 
them said to be his own offspring) might be allowed to 
be freed and remain in the place ‘where their families 
and connections are ;’’ but the request was denied, and 
the slaves were sold. 

It is the law of Christian fellowship, that all who love 
the Lord Jesus, are members one of another, and that 
when one member suffers, all the members suffer with it. 
Hence the thrilling of that cord of sympathy which has 
been felt in all ages of the church, toward those who suf- 
fer for conscience sake, or who are deprived of the free- 
dom of worshipping God and obeying the commands of 
Christ. Witness the recent meetings and the intense ex- 
citement throughout the Protestant world, in regard to 
the case of Francisco Madiai and his wife, imprisoned 


14 | Own SLAVERY. 


in Tuscany, for the crime of reading the Scriptures. 
Both the slaves and the free people of color, in the slave 
States, live in a constant state of persecution. They can 
not learn nor teach the Scriptures without being exposed 
to stripes, they cannot meet for worship, nor to preach 
and hear the Gospel as their religion dictates. All their 
attempts at self-cultivation or to educate their offspring, 
are repressed, by a despotism more ubiquitous and all- 
pervading than it is possible for the Austrians to exercise 
in Italy. The essence of spiritual despotism and perse- 
cution lies in the enforcement of laws, in that of Virginia, 
that ‘‘any free colored person who undertakes to preach 
or conduct a religious meeting, by day or night, may be 
whipped. not exceeding thirty-nine lashes, at the discre- 
tion of any justice of the peace.’? The pious Christians 
of the South, of the North, of the whole world, are 
themselves aggrieved and oppressed by such enactments ; 
and when they see their fellow-Christians dragged from 
the house of prayer to the calaboose, or writhing under 
the lash for the offence of the Cross, must sympathize 
with them, and feel that they themselves, their religion, 
and their Savior, share in the cruel persecution. 
Atrocious as are the statutes forbidding the master to 
free his slave, and making even the attempt an offence 
punishable by fine or imprisonment, there is one feature 
of the laws in the slave States still more abominable ; it 
is that which perpetually watches for opportunities to en- 
slave the free. The legal presumption in those States is 
that every colored person is somebody’s slave, and if found 
going at large, that he has run away, and ought to be 
captured and sent back. Hence any person may seize 
and detain him, unless he carries in his pocket the legal 
proofs of his freedon ; he is advertised, and if any owner 
appears to claim him, he is delivered up as a slave, or if 


On Savery. 15 


no owner comes, he is sold for his suit fees, and so is 
made hopelessly a slave. Any emancipated slave may 
be seized by the sheriff, and sold. In the year 1776, a 
number of Quakers, in North Carolina, became so im- 
pressed with the wrongfulness of slavery, that they 
emancipated their slaves, one hundred and thirty-four in 
number. ‘There being then no law to prevent it, the 
Legislature passed an act requiring the County Courts to 
sell these persons, and when the Supreme Court declared 
the sale illegal, the legislature passed another act, con- 
firming the title of the purchasers, and so they and their 
posterity are slaves still. 

It is still an aggravating consideration that all this 
terrible legislation owes its force and terror entirely to 
the cowardly submission of those who live under it. The 
sole pretext for its necessity is that slavery cannot be up- 
held without it. Only let Christian people receive the 
doctrine that slavery itself is wrong, and that there can 
be no obligation on any man to support it, and then let 
them act according to the dictates of conscience and the 
obvious rules of Christ’s kingdom, and those unnatural 
laws are instantly paralyzed. A solitary individual, or a 
few scattered here and there, might be unable to sustain 
themselves, and might even be subjected to penalties. 
But as soon as any considerable number of Christians 
openly but quietly commence preaching and teaching, 
and distributing Bibles and tracts among the slaves, just 
as they would among any other class of people, the exe- 
cution of such laws is at once impossible—prisons could 
not hold the people, nor could magistrates or sheriffs be 
found to enforce such precepts. Let Christian men 
emancipate their slaves, evidently for the love of God 
and the safety of their own souls, continuing their care 
over the freed people, until they become accustomed to 


16 On SUAVERY. 


take care of themselves, and doing everything for their 
benefit which justice and humanity would require in the: 
circumstances, and it would not be possible to re-enslave. 
them—not even the professional soul-aduisers would buy: 
them. And when once the work is begun, it will advance 
spontaneously, with accelerating speed. ‘Thousands of. 
noble hearts, at the South, are now waiting for the finger 
of God to point out the man, the hour, and the place, 
when the deliverance from this crushing spiritual bond=. 
age will take place. 

It would take too much space to explain the disastrous: 
influence of slavery, upon the general prosperity of the: 
nation. The power which the slaveholders have acquired 
in politics is too well known, and too humiliating. It is 
important to consider the effect of slavery and its institu- 
tions, in weakening the safe-guards of civil liberty. By 
the common law, which is the basis of our free institu- 
tions, the rights of persons are always paramount to the 
interests of property. But slavery has grafted the bad 
principles of the Roman law upon our jurisprudence, and. 
made the claims of property the foremost objects of re- 
gard. As a case in point, about a dozen years ago, some 
Africans escaped from slavery, in Cuba, and landed with: 
the schooner Amistad, on our shore. They were taken’ , 
in custody, by the United States Marshal. Their friends 
sued out a writ of habeas corpus, at common law, to 
establish. their freedom, which was unquestionable, as 
they were evidently just imported from Africa, and so 
_ were free by Spanish law. But the Spanish purchaser 
libelled them in admiralty, as, his property. Judge 
Thompson, of the United States Court, decided that the 
admiralty case must first be heard, to see whether those. 
men were not property, before they could be allowed ta. 
show that they were free men. The writ of habeas cor- , 


On Siavery. Ag 


pus, which our constitution recognizes as an existing 
general right prior to the constitution or the Union itself, 
was devised for the express purpose of bringing the 
right of personal freedom under the instant cognizance 
of the courts ; and, to postpone habeas corpus to admi- 
ralty proceedings, as concerning property, is destructive 
to the most precious safe-guards of liberty. The methods 
of proceeding in the case of alleged fugitives from slavery 
are also derogatory to habeas corpus. And as neither 
the constitution nor the laws of Congress say anything 
about the dark complexion or African descent of the vic- 
tims, the provisions of the injurious Fugitive Slave Law 
are fully fitted in the hands of an oppressive administra- 
tion, or a corrupt commissioner, to be employed in the 
abduction or imprisonment of any person whatever. 

It is found absolutely impossible to administer two such 
systems of jurisprudence in harmony, as the law of lib- 
erty and the law of slavery. They cannot work together. 
They cannot both be executed. And certainly, of late, 
we have found the principles of formal freedom so often 
sacrificed and so generally made light of, that there is 
ground for great alarm as to the ees 

Is it not then the duty of every one of us to be i inquir- 
ing how this thing is to end? Certainly, things cannot 
remain as they are, but must grow either worse or better. 
It is not at all natural that such an evil should cure itself. 
There must be an influence brought to bear upon it from 
without itself. The impulse must come from the people 
of the free States, just as certainly as the impulse for the 
recovery of the inebriates, came from the sober. The 
actual work of emancipation must be done at the South, 
and by one of two ways—by the will of the slaveholders 
or by the will of the slaves. If a wise and healthful in- 
fluence can be created at the North, and so kindly and 


18 Own Savery. 


firmly presented, as to be responded to at the South, 
slavery will be abolished by voluntary surrender, at the 
will of the slaveholders, according to the dictates of jus- 
tice and humanity, by the force of truth, and to the glory 
of God and the good of all. parties. If this influence is 
not exerted at the North, or if it will not be tolerated by 
the South, then the mingled influence of increasing num- 
bers and intelligence among the slaves, or—by increasing 
severity by the slaveholders—a purely Southern influ- 
ence, will burst the chains at the will of the slaves, with 
consequences more terrible than the heart can conceive. 
The great multiplication of deeds of vengeance among 
the slaves, since the supporters of the ‘‘ Compromise ”’ 
pronounced the anti-slavery movement of the North to 
be dead and buried, is a warning of what would happen, 
were despair of human help to become universal among 
the slaves. 

It is certain that the Northern advocates of emancipa- 
tion are alone the true friends of the South. They stand 
between the planters and their vassals. They keep back 
the coming earthquake. And if they can put forth power 
enough, and in season, they may well hope to avert the 
calamity, and turn the threatened storm. into a calm. 
Every dictate of Christianity, of humanity, of patriotism, 
and sympathy with our dear friends at the South, urges 
us to do something —to do everything that is in our 
power, to create that influence in the North, which will 
be felt and yielded to as good at the South. You ask 
what you shall do. 

There are two main pillars of Northern support, by 
which+the system of slavery is manifestly upheld — poli- 
tics and religion. The political support of slavery, by 
parties and politicians, and capitalists and clergymen, 
secures to the slaveholders an absolute control of the 


On SLAVERY. 19 


government, the appointments to office, the legislation of 
Congress, diplomacy with foreign powers, and the spoils 
. of the National Treasury. So long as the North submits ~ 
to this, you may depend upon it, Southern politicians will 
cling to slavery as the sure ladder of their ambition. It 
is for the people of the North to change this, by refusing 
to vote for any man, to any office, who will lend his po- 
litical gupport to the slave power, and then, by seizing 
every opportunity of voting against such subservient 
men, and elevating in their place men who will wield 
official power in favor of freedom and against slavery. 
When the support of slavery becomes a disqualification 
rather than a passport for office at the North, and as soon 
as the North can be made to act together on this plat- 
form, the tide of influence will turn. As soon as the 
friends of freedom shall become a well compacted body 
at the North, the longing hearts at the South will be in- 
spired with confidence, and will respond to every effort 
in a kindred spirit and with special effect. 

The moral and religious branch of this reform is more 
complicated, and in some respects more difficult, on ac- 
count of the great diversity of views among Christians 
as to the modes of operation for the extension of the 
truth. It is also more far-reaching and vastly more ef- 
fective in the long run, because it looks to the general 
changing of the minds of the slaveholders, by the power 
of Christian suasion, until they shall joyfully ‘let the 
oppressed go free.’’ In general terms, we are to counte- 
nance those ministers and editors who are themselves | 
faithful to truth and duty on this subject, and when prac- 
ticable withdraw our patronage and countenance from 
those who are wilfully perverse, and hesitate. Let char- 
ity have the fullest possible scope consistent with common 
sense. But charity is not a fool, nor bound to close her 


20 On SLAVERY. 


eyes against palpable facts. It is certainly time to re- 
quire some proofs from the South, that the Gospel, as 
there administered, tends to abolish and not to perpetuate 
slavery. The missionary boards cannot evade that test 
of the results of their labor, both among the whites and 
in the Indian tribes. When-is your sort: of Christianity 
going to begin to free the slaves ? 

In a matter confessedly so difficult, and among a 
people whose views are so diverse, it is too much to ex- 
pect a unity of views among all the friends of freedom, 
except upon a very few, very simple, and most directly 
practical points. Let us not fall into the error of those 
who forbade their neighbors casting out the devil, ‘be- 
cause he followeth not with us,” in all the points of doc- 
trine or practice. We should gladly commend all who 
give reasonable evidence of sincerity in their endeavors. 
Let them do all the good they can, as well as they know. 
If we know a better way, let us follow it in a better man- 
ner. Without a compromise of principle, there needs to 
be an increase of mutual forbearance. But this is less 
essential than a great increase of zeal. And as all de- 
pends upon the wisdom of God for guidance, and upon 
his blessing for success—there is one thing in which we 
ean all agree—that prayer be made without ceasing unto 
God in behalf of our enslaving and enslaved fellow- 
countrymen, for their speedy deliverance from this stu- 
pendous curse. 


THE END. 





AMERICAN Rerorm Tract anp Book Soctrery. 


REMARKS OF THE PUBLISHING COMMITTEE. 





The author of the foregoing Tract has drawn a vivid, 
forcible, and, as both experience and the slave code show, 
a truthful picture of slavery. ‘Terrible as it appears, it 
is no fancy sketch. The system as here described, actu- 
ally exists among us, and actually reduces to the condi- 
tion of a herd of cattle, three millions of the American 
people, while its reactive influence demoralizes other mil- 
lions, and embroils and endangers the whole country. 

Judged by the Word of God, or the unbiassed con- 
science of man, to establish or maintain such a system is 
a sin against God, of the most aggravated character. 
We know how it was established, but by whom is it now 
maintained ? Who is responsible before God for its con- 
tinuance ? Who is involved in its guilt? These are ques- 
tions which we are all bound to examine, as we hope to 
be acquitted at Jehovah’s bar. The answer to these in- 
quiries bears most heavily upon the Christians -of this 
country, when we consider the controlling influence which 
is wielded by the churches, in its favor, and remember to 
what an appalling extent these churches are directly in- 
volved in this sin of buying, selling, and holding, which 
constitutes the stealing of men. As appears by the fol- 
lowing table, believed to be within the truth, nearly onz- 
rourRTH of all the slaveholding of the country rests upon 
the members of our churches: 


22 REMARKS OF THE PUBLISHING COMMITTEE. 


Denominations. No. of Slaves. 
Methodists, 00435 f.6e ou. US ee 219,563 
Presbyterians, Old and New Schools........ 77,000 
Baptists 05 3/55 wis sieve wie. ¢ 2 asqack hae 125,000 
Disciples, or Reformed Baptists............ 101,000 
Episcopalians: 2c ia. tn ss via s'eae 88,000 
Other Denominations........+.. haa ole 50,000 — 





Total owned by Ministers and Church members 600,563 


The disposition to hold slaves has not been diminished 
since this calculation was made, and we may consider the 
number of slaves thus owned at the present time, as af 
least seven hundred thousand, allowing the above esti- 
mate as correct when made. 

Who does not perceive that the almost resistless influ- 
ence of the churches watchful to protect Two HUNDRED 
AND EIGHTY MILLIONS OF DOLLARS thus invested by their 
own members, must form the principal defence of the 
slaveholding ‘ system? Political influence could not 
maintain it a single year, if unsupported by the churches 
themselves. Here then rests the main responsibility and 
the principal guilt. Reader, how much of this responsi- 
bility rests upon you? Do you belong to a church 
whose members are owners of slaves, whose ministers 
defend it, or refuse to class it among sins? Do you not 
then belong to a slaveholding and slavetrading copart- 
nership, and are you not personally involved in the guilt? 
Do you support Mission Boards or other Societies that 
foster slavery, or refuse to rebuke and expose it? If so, 
are you not verily guilty of your brother’s blood and 
tears? Does your vote sustain the system or jts sup- 
porters? Are you not then guilty, and is not your name 
mentioned in the cry that ascends to the throne of God? 


WHAT IS TO BE DONE? 


ROR Ae 





The thing to be done, of which I shall chiefly speak, is 
that the whole American church, of all denominations, 
should unitedly come up to the noble purpose avowed by 
the Presbyterian Assembly of 1818, to seek the uy- 
TIRE ABOLITION OF SLAVERY THROUGHOUT AMERICA AND 
_ THROUGHOUT CHRISTENDOM. 

To this noble course, the united voice of Christians in 
all other countries is urgently calling the American 
church. Expressions of this feeling have come from 
_ Christians of all denominations in England, in Scotland, in 
Treland, in France, in Switzerland, in Germany, in Persia, 
in the Sandwich Islands, and in China. All seem to be 
animated by one spirit. They have loved and honored 
this American church. They have rejoiced in the bright- 
ness of her rising. Her prosperity and success have been 
to them as their own, and they have had hopes that God 
meant to confer inestimable blessings through her upon 
all nations. The American church has been to them like 
the rising of a glorious sun, shedding healing from his 
wings, dispersing mists and fogs, and bringing songs of 
birds and voices of cheerful industry, and sounds of glad- 
ness, contentment, and peace. But lo! in this beautiful 
orb is seen a disastrous spot of dim eclipse, whose gradu- 
ally widening shadow threatens a total darkness. Can we 
wonder that the voice of remonstrance comes to us from 
those who have so much at stake in our prosperity and suc- 
cess? We have sent out our missionaries to all quarters 





Q4 WHAT Is to BE Done? 


of the globe; but how shall they tell their heathen con. 
verts the things that are done in Christianized America i 
How shall our missionaries in Mahometan countries hold 
up their heads, and proclaim the superiority of our elie 
gion, when we tolerate barbarities which men neve re- ‘ 
pudiated ? ; 

A missionary ¢ among the Karens, i in Age writes pice) 
that his course is mah embarrassed by a suspicion that 
is afloat among the Karens, that the Americans intend to 
steal and sell them. He says: ‘ : 

«‘T dread the time when these Karens will be able to “g 
read our books and get a full knowledge of all that is go- 
ing on in our country. Many of them are very inquisitive 
now, and often ask me questions that I find it eee) diffi- in 
cult to answer.’ 

No, there is no resource.” The einen of bib United 
States is shut up, in the providence of God, to one work. 
She can never fulfill her mission till this is done. So lang 
as she neglects this, it will lie in the way of oxo ne J 
else which she attempts to do. eee, ae 


She must undertake it for another eee Se shies’ 
alone can perform the work peaceably. If this fearful pro- _ 


blem is left to take its course as a mere political question, to. oe 
be ground out between the upper and nether millstones of 
political parties, then what will avert agitation, angry vos * 
lisions, and the desperate rending the Union? No, there — 
is no safety but in making it a religious enterprise, and 
pursuing it in a Christian spirit, and by Se uel means.— : 
Hey to Uncle Tom’s Cabin, P. 250. es 











Cs 
ed 
Are 


ee 
ee 


wy 








if 





‘a 


sae 























a pe a ae Warhdees poy ao 


ae 











Boston Public Library _ 3 
Central Library, Copley Square 4 | 


Division of 
Reference and Research Services 


The Date Due Card in the noses indi- a, se 
cates ie date on or before whic ae ae 





"4 
ihe 
‘4 
Dn 


ea