Skip to main content

Full text of "Our domestic fowls"

See other formats


a 
a2 


OLNOHOL 4O ALISH3AAINN 


CAN) 
COa REZ 


NN et ROA RARE 


“RY STO Mm 


v 
re 


thy) 


Religious Tract Society, 56, Paternoster Row. 


THE MONTHLY VOLUME, 


EACH BOOK COMPLETE IN ITSELF, OCCASIONALLY 
ILLUSTRATED WITH ENGRAVINGS, AND CQNTAIN- 
ING ONE HUNDRED AND NINETY-TWO PAGES, IN 
A GOOD, BOLD TYPE. 


SIXPENCE, IN FANCY PAPER COVERS. 
TENPENCE, IN CLOTH BOARDS, GILT EDGES. 


“‘T never wanted articles on religious subjects half so much as 
articles on common subjects, written with a decidedly Christian 
tone.”—Dr. ARNOLD. 


Penn ws 


Tue Committee of the Retigrous Tracr Society 
have resolved to publish a volume every month, 
adapted to the new development and growing in- 
telligence of the times. This series, with the 
exception of a few reprints, will be Oria@inaL ; 
from the pens of authors of ability in their respective 
departments in literature and science :—Scrip- 
TURAL; in the principles in which they are written : 
—Poputar ; in their style ; so that instead of being 
limited to one class of the community, they may 
be generally acceptable :—PortaBie; that they 
may serve as “‘ hand-books”’ abroad and at home: 
—and Economica; the twelve volumes of a year 
costing less than three half-pence per week. Thus 
while the MONTHLY SERIES will be fully 
adapted to the educated Famiuizs of our land, to 
Day and Sunpay Scwoots and to the Lisrarizs 


2 THE MONTHLY VOLUME. 


of mechanics and others, they will supply interest - 
ing and valuable reading to a large number of the 
people, who can only spare time enough for the 
perusal of a small volume, and whose means will 
not allow of a more costly purchase. 


ISSUE OF THE FIRST YEAR. 
THE LIFE OF JULIUS CASSAR. 
GLIMPSES OF THE DARK AGES. 
WILD FLOWERS OF THE YEAR. 
JAMAICA, ENSLAVED AND FREE. 
THE TASK AND OTHER POEMS, by Wm. Cowper. 
OUR SONG BIRDS. 
SOLAR SYSTEM, Parts I. and II. By Dr. Dick. 
SKETCHES OF THE WALDENSES. 
LIFE OF LUTHER. 
BLIGHTS OF THE WHEAT. By the Rev. E. Sipney, 


M.A. 
ANCIENT JERUSALEM. By Dr. Kr17T0. 
PHILOSOPHY OF THE PLAN OF SALVATION. 


SECOND YEAR, ALREADY PUBLISHED. 


MAN, IN HIS PHYSICAL, INTELLECTUAL, SOCIAL, 
AND MORAL RELATIONS. By W. Newnuam, Esq. 

MODERN JERUSALEM. By Dr. Kirro. 

LIFE OF CYRUS. 

GARDEN FLOWERS OF THE YEAR. 

DAWN OF MODERN CIVILIZATION, 

LIFE OF LADY RUSSELL. 

OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


In the Press. 


LIFE OF MOHAMMED. 
SKETCHES OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION. 


Other Volumes are preparing. 


The Committee of the ReLt1g1ous Tract Society 
look with confidence to their friends, to aid them 
in widely distributing their Monruiy Votumg, in 
Famiuies, Scuooits, and GenerAL LiBrariEs ; 
while they entreat on this new effort the effectual 
blessing of Almighty God. 


OUR 


DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


BY 


W. C. L. MARTIN. 


, 


LONDON: 
THE RELIGIOUS TRACT SOCIETY: 
Inslituted 1799, 


OF 
LU BR 
M3 


TIBRARPS, 


MAY 29 1967 


CONTENTS.—No. I. 


INTRODUCTION . . < 
Domestic Poultry . 
THE GALLINACEOUS GrouP 
The Common Fowl A 
Ist. The Malay Gigantic Fowl 
2nd. The Javanese Jungle-fowl 
8rd. Sonnerat’s Jungle-fowl 
The Pea-fowl 5 : - 
The Turkey b : : 
The Guinea-fowl 2 
THE CoLUMBINE, OR PIGEON Gnoue 
The Domestic Pigeon . 
The Rock Pigeon A 3 
The Carrier, or Horseman . 
The Dragoon, or Dragon 0 
The Pouter c 
The Barb 0 e 
The Fan-tail 6 4 
The Jacobine, or Capper 
The Turbit ; C ° 
The Nun > : 
The Trumpeter ; 
The Tumbler 


The Almond, or Ermine "Tumbler 


. 


THE SWIMMING, oR NATATORIAL Group 


The Domestic Duck 

The Domestic Goose- . 

The Tame Swan, or Mute Seas 
Conclusion . ‘ > : 


. . 


CONTENTS.—No. II. 


Gallus Domesticus—(The commen Fowl) . ° . 
Gallus giganleus—(The Malay gigantic Fowl . . 
Gallus Bankiva—(The Javanese Jungle-fow!) 5 . 
Gallus Sonneratii—(Sonnerat’s Jungle-fowl)  . > 
Gallus furcatus—(The Fork-tailed Cock of Java) . 
Gallus egneus—(The Bronzed Cock of Sumatra) 
Euplocamus ignilus—(The Fire-backed Pheasant) 

Pavo cristatus—(The Pea-fow]) S : : ; é 

Meleagris gallopavo—(The Turkey) . 9 2 . 3 

Meleagris ocellata—(The Honduras Turkey) . : ; 

Numida Meleagris—(The Guinea-fowl, or Pintado) . ° 

Columba livia—(The Rock Pigeon) 3 A S 5 

Anas sponsa—(The Summer, or Wood Duck of America) . 

Anas—(Domestic Duck) . 5 ; b . ; ; 

Anas moschata—(Muscovy Duck) 5 : i A Z 


Anser erythropus—Flem. The Whi 2 
te-fi 2 
Anser albifrons—Bechst. he ie Sener 


Anser ferus—Flem. . 
Anser segetum—Steph. Cee Pease) ; 

_Anser Phoeenicopus—(The Pink-foot Goose) a 6 . 
be ron } (The Grey lag Wild Gcose) . 
Chenalopex A:gypticus—(The Egyptian Goose, or Vulpauser) 
Anser Canadensis—(The Canada Goose) 6 d ° 
Anser Cygnoides—(The Chinese Goose) . c é c 


Cygnus olor—(The Tame Swan, or Mute Swan) 
Cygnus ferus—Ray. —(The Hooper, or Whistling 
Cygnus musicus—Bechst. Swan) . A E 


Cygnus Bewickii—(Bewick’s Swan) 5 5 
Cygnus buccinator—(The Trumpeter Sw a, d 2 : 


105 
106 
121 
154 
154 
163 


165 


165 


165 
165 


177 
178 
180 
131 


185 
1S? 
1&8 


OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


eines 


INTRODUCTION. 


Tue only history of man in his primeval 
condition is that contained in the book of 
Genesis. The records of that book — the 
truthfulness of which modern discoveries tend 
more and more to confirm, (irrespective of 
the claim, which its internal evidence justifies, 
to the pen of inspiration,)—show us that our 
primitive forefathers were far removed from 
that debased condition in which we now find 
the natives of Australia, or some of the 
Papuan islands. They were not savages—nor 
is a savage state of existence natural to man ; 
it is not that to which he necessarily and at 
once descended after the fall; it is not that 
for which the Almighty destined his species ; 
but, nevertheless, it is a state into which 
tribes and people have degenerated. At the 
same time, they are not without the capa- 


6 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


bility of emerging from it, and taking that 
station in which the fiat of God placed man 
when he bade him ‘‘replenish the earth, and 
subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of 
the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and 
over every living thing that moveth upon the 
earth.’’ This dominion over the lower orders 
of creation, which the real savage cannot be 
said rightly to exercise, was not abrogated 
after the fall, but appears rather to have been 
put into active operation immediately ; for we 
read of the skins of slain animals—probably 
of those offered up in sacrifice—being made 
use of for garments, and of Abel, who is ex- 
pressly stated to have been a keeper of sheep, 
bringing ‘‘ of the firstlings of his flock, and of 
the fat thereof,’ as an offering to the Lord. 
Here we have a proof of the early domestica- 
tion of the sheep; and soon after we read of 
Jabal, that he was “the father of such as 
dwell in tents, and of such as have cattle.” 
We have, now, oxen and sheep recorded as 
being domesticated, doubtless from a sense of 
their value ; and perhaps, though no mention 
is made of it, the faithful dog may have been 
their guardian against the ferocious beasts of 
prey. The very circumstance of man’s suc- 


INTRODUCTION. 7 


cessful attempt at the subjugation of animals 
serviceable to his interests, and constituting 
his riches, to say nothing of his commencing 
artificer in brass (copper) and iron, and his 
construction of musical instruments, proves 
that, in the infancy of the species, he was quick 
to discern, prompt to execute, skilful in opera- 
tions, and anxious to extend the sphere of his 
actions. Doomed to ‘‘the toil and work of 
his hands, because of the ground which the 
Lord had cursed,” he sat not down in savage 
sloth and supineness, but, mustering his ener- 
gies, both of mind and body, began his career 
of improvement. After the deluge, we read 
of Noah practising the arts of husbandry, 
planting vines, and producing wine from the 
juice of the grape, and we have some reason 
to believe that he not only possessed flocks of 
sheep, and herds of cattle, but even camels 
and asses. Of Abraham we read that he was 
rich in flocks and herds, and in silver and 
gold. He had goats, also, and it is unques- 
tionable that, in his day, the ass and camel 
were domesticated, for these animals are enu- 
merated among the riches of the Pharaoh, 
king of Egypt, whom he went to visit during 
a time of famine, 


8 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


’ [tis not until a later period that we read 
of the horse, namely, under the rule of Joseph 
in Egypt, when ‘‘he gave them bread in ex- 
change for horses, and for the flocks, and for 
the cattle of the herds, and for the asses.” 
But this notice, in conjunction with another 
in Genesis xlix. 17, ‘ Dan shall be a serpent 
in the way, an adder in the path, that biteth 
the horse’s heels, so that his rider shall fall 
backward,” proves that, in some districts at 
least, this animal had been subjugated: and 
we know that, on the departure of the Israel- 
ites from Egypt, the monarch pursued them 
with horsemen and chariots. Horses are sub- 
sequently noticed abundantly, as are also 
mules; nor need we refer our reader to the 
numerous passages in which distinct mention 
is made of them. 

With respect to the dog, the first direct 
allusion to it is in Exodus xi. 7: “ But against 
any of the children of Israel shall not a dog, 
move his tongue ;’’ and we need not say that 
it was inserted by Moses in the list of unclean 
animals, with directions concerning the flesh 
of torn beasts, which was to be thrown to the 
dogs. Swine were placed in the catalogue of 
unclean animals by the Mosaic ritual, and 


INTRODUCTION, 9 


other nations regarded the hog not only as unfit 
for food, but even as defiling the person with 
whom it came in contact ; yet, from this very 
prohibition of its flesh, we infer that it was 
kept in a domesticated state by many tribes, 
anterior to the time of Moses, though we have 
no previous notice of it. 

No mention of the cat * occurs in the Scrip- 
tures; but with this exception,—and it need 
scarcely be said, that of the llama, peculiar to 
the Andes of the American continent, that 
of the elephant, of the buffalo of India, and of 
the rein-deer of the arctic circle—all our do- 
mestic quadrupeds are noticed as being already 
subdued to man’s use anterior to the time of 
Moses—we may say anterior to the time of 
Abraham. In this list, we do not include the © 
mule—the hybrid progeny of the ass and 
mare, which was, perhaps, not known until a 
somewhat later period than the remote age of 
which we are speaking. In fact, the most 
valuable of our quadrupeds are those which 
were the first domesticated ; and of this fact, 

* The Egyptians certainly had a cat, or small feline animal, 
domesticated, and, as a painting in the British Museum 
proves, trained to assist the fowler in catching birds. The 


painting, with others, was taken from the walls of the grotto 
in the western hill of Thebes. 


A3 


a0) OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


while its main design is to show us man’s 
origin and fall, the spread of our race, and 
the separation of the Israelites from other 
nations as a peculiar people, the earlier por- 
tion of the Old Testament clearly informs us ; 
nor could this information, so interesting to 
the naturalist, be gained from any other source, * 
—not even from the sculptured remains of 
the Egyptians. 

But while our attention is called to the 
domestic quadrupeds, sheep, goats, oxen, dogs, 
camels, asses, and horses, at a more or less 
remote period, it may appear somewhat strange 
at first, that we find no distinct allusion to 
any domestic creatures of the feathered race, 
though at a distant date, as paintings abund- 
antly prove, numbers of geese and ducks were 
kept by the Egyptians, who esteemed their 
flesh as food.* Perhaps the pigeon may be 
excepted. We read of a turtle-dove, and 
‘young pigeon” as being sacrificed by Abraham 
in Gen. xv. 9, and we read in the Leyvitical law, 
that, instead of a lamb, the poor were permitted 
to bring as an offering ‘‘ two turtle-doves or 


* Herodotus observes that the Egyptians eat quails, ducks, 
and small birds, without cooking them, haying first put them 
in salt. 


INTRODUCTION. re 


two young pigeons,’’ such as he is able to get, 
whence it is not improbable that domestic 
pigeons were reared at an early, though not 
very remote-period, if not for food, for the ap- 
pointed offerings and sacrifices ; but of this we 
are by no means sure, nor unless the birds 
were kept in cages, which we do not hear, 
could their domestication be effected by a 
nomadic people. This observation is equally 
applicable to other species of the feathered 
tribes. Domestic poultry necessarily require 
a settled state of society, the permanent occu- 
pation of dwellings, a fixed residence, a de- 
finite possession of the land, an exchange of 
camps and migrations in search of pasturage 
for permanent villages and systematic agricul- 
ture. Hence, though the Egyptians might 
possess various domestic birds, coming under 
the general title of poultry, and though these 
might be known to the patriarchs, still, as 
they were not among their possessions, and 
for obvious reasons could not be, we cannot 
be surprised that the Old Testament, in the 
earlier books, makes no mention of them. 
When, indeed, the Israelitish nation became 
established, and its power consolidated, the 
stronghold of Zion being won from the 


12 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Jebusites, and the power of the Philistines 
utterly destroyed, then we might expect to 
hear of the rise of the arts of civil life, of 
commerce, and of its attendant circumstances. 
David established the Israclitish kingdom, 
His son Solomon, who succeeded him, as- 
cended the throne in peace, and immediately 
began to extend commerce, to patronize 
science, to build and plant, and accumulated 
treasures. His own words are, “I made me 
great works ; I builded me houses ; I planted 
me vineyards: I made me gardens and 
orchards, and I planted trees in them of all 
kinds of fruits: I made me pools of water, to 
water therewith the wood that bringeth forth 
trees (growing plantations) : I got me servants 
and maidens, and had servants born in my 
house; also I had great possessions of great and 
small cattle above all that were in Jerusalem 
before me: I gathered me also silver and gold, 
and the peculiar (precious) treasure of kings 
and of the provinces : I gat me men-singers and 
women-singers, and the delights of the sons 
of men, as musical instruments and that of all 
sorts. So I was great and increased more 
than all that were before me in Jerusalem : also 
my wisdom remained with me,” Eccles. ii, 


INTRODUCTION. 13 


4—9, Elsewhere we read of the monarch’s 
acquirements in natural history, and have 
yeason to believe that he wrote on the subject, 
though the works are lost. We know that 
he procured ivory, apes, and peacocks, by 
means of the ships of Tarshish, which returned 
every three years from the remote east, laden 
with treasures. Other remarkable animals, 
and, no doubt, beautiful plants, and other 
curious productions of the distant countries 
visited by the fleet, were brought for the 
scientific monarch, as conducive to the esta- 
blishment of a menagerie, and the ornament 
of his gardens, as well as the increase of his 
wealth. We have noticed the peacock, a 
native of India, as one of the importations, 
and a beautiful ornament it was to the court- 
yards, the lawns, and gardens of the palace. 
This bird, however, was known at a far earlier 
period,* for it is briefly alluded to in the same 
chapter (39th) of the book of Job, as that 
in which the wild ass and the war-horse are so 
finely depicted; but, in the time of Solomon, 
it must have been tolerably abundant, and in 


* Perhaps its feathers only had reached western Asia, ty 
some circuitous route from India, and not the bird itself. 
European naturalists were acquainted with the elegant plumes 
of many birds, long before they were able to acquire specimens. 


14 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


the possession of his friend Hiram, king of 
Tyre, whose ‘‘shipmen that had knowledge 
of the sea’? conducted the expeditions. Nor 
would his great men and nobles be forgotten. 
Another notice occurs in the history of Solo- 
mon, (1 Kings iv. 23,) which leads us to infer, 
and we think legitimately, that ordinary do- 
mestic poultry, of some kind or other, was 
reared by the Israelites, as it undoubtedly was 
by the Egyptians, whose monarch’s daughter 
Solomon had married. In the account of the 
daily consumption of the palace, we read of 
“ten fat oxen, and twenty oxen out of the 
pastures, and a hundred sheep, besides harts 
and roebucks, and fallow deer, and fatted 
fowl.” We do not mean that poultry was 
kept in the city, but in the adjacent villages 
and the farms, particularly those of the king 
and his nobles. At a far later period, poultry 
was kept even in Jerusalem. The editor of 
the Pictorial Bible, referring to the expression 
‘n Matthew xxvi. 74, ‘the cock crew,” says, 
«To this it has been objected that there were 
no cocks kept in Jerusalem, lest their habit of 
turning over dunghills, where they might find 
creeping things, should expose to pollution 
the holy food, the peace-offerings and thank- 


INTRODUCTION, 15 


offerings, which were eaten in that city. It is 
not disputed that such a regulation existed, 
but we know that it was, on some account or 
other, dispensed with or not enforced. For 
Lightfoot and others have shown that cocks 
were actually kept at Jerusalem as in other 
places, and instance the story in the Jerusalem 
Talmud of a cock which was stoned by the 
sentence of the council for having killed a 
little child.’ That the pigeon was now do- 
mesticated, or rather reconciled to breed in 
dove-cotes, there can be little doubt, but great 
numbers, in a still wilder condition, tenanted 
the ledges and holes in the rocks, as they 
tenant the towers of old ruins, the steeples of 
abbeys and churches, and the cliffs along the 
coast of our island. The demand for the 
young of this bird, as offerings in the temple, 
was extremely great, till at length they were 
publicly sold within the walls of the sacred 
edifice. 

The swan, and evidently the wild swan, is 
mentioned in the Levitical code, among the 
unclean meats; but though the Divinely di- 
rected legislator must have been well ac- 
quainted with the goose and duck, birds kept, 
as we have said, in great abundance in Egypt, 


16 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


no mention is made of them, nor know we 
whether they were allowed to be eaten or not ; 
it is very probable that all web-footed swim- 
ming birds might be included under the term 
swan, (tinshemeth,) granting that bird* to be 
really intended and therefore prohibited. Both 
tame geese and ducks in the present day are 
rarely to be met with in Syria, or western 
Asia generally. They are not in demand 
among the Moslems, who rarely eat them. 
With respect to those domestic birds, 
originally imported from central Africa or 
America, as the Guinea-fowl and turkey, we 
cannot, as a matter of course, find any allusion 
to them in the Scriptures; but it is some- 
what strange that the pheasant, from the 
borders of the Phasis and the country around 
the Euxine, and so remarkable for beauty, 
should not be noticed. We think, however, 
that an easy explanation may be given: when 
the waters of the deluge were assuaging, Noah 
selected two birds by way of experiment, the 
raven and the dove; the ark was left dry on 
mount Ararat, probably in Armenia; we have 


* Michaelis and Parkhurst think the goose is intended, others 
the Hyacinthine gallinule, a beautiful bird allied to the water~ 
hen. 


INTRODUCTION. 17 


then a brief narrative of a series of important 
events, extending over a period of about 327 
years, and a list of generations, till we come 
to the injunction laid upon Abraham to leave 
his country and kindred; he passed with 
Lot unto the land of Canaan, and thence into 
Egypt, with flocks and herds, his property ; 
thenceforth he and his descendants led a 
nomadic life in Syria and Arabia, feeding 
their flocks and herds, their asses and camels. 
Consequently, that neither this elegant bird,* 
nor any other, excepting turtle-doves and 
young pigeons, common in Syria, and used as 
offerings, should be alluded to in the history 
of the patriarchs, may be readily accounted 
for. Subsequently it might have been known 
to Solomon, but of this we cannot be certain. 

Thus, then, referring to the oldest authentic 
records which we possess, have we endeavoured 
to deduce from scattered notices, the early 
condition of man on the globe, the necessity 


* It is among the people who emigrated westward from Asia 
Minor, that the first notice of the pheasant occurs, and this is 
what might be expected. The Greeks attribute its introduction 
into Greece to Jason, a hero of the fabulous period of classic 
history, who undertook what is termed the Argonautic expe- 
dition, and procured it in Colchis, on the banks of the Phasis, 
the present Faz, or Rion. The date of the Argonautic expe- 
dition is placed by Newton, B.c. 937; by Blair, B.c. 1263. 


18 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


which impelled him, and the skill which aided 
him to subjugate certain animals essential to 
his well-being. It has been shown that there 
were quadrupeds constituting to the present 
moment the most valuable of civilized man’s 
possessions, flocks and herds—the dog, the 
ass, the horse, and the camel. We have 
expressed an opinion that it was not until 
tribes became stationary, cultivating the soil, 
and engaging in commerce, that the domestic- 
ation of any of the feathered tribes began; 
and even that nomadic people, though well 
aware of such domestic poultry being possessed 
by the dwellers of towns, and villages, and 
settled farms, could not if they wished it keep 
them, from the very circumstances of their 
habits,—whereas, with respect to fhe quad- 
rupeds alluded to, the very opposite would be 
the case. 

In the creation of animals, whether quad- 
rupeds or birds, expressly serviceable to man, 
and so highly conducive to his prosperity, and, 
at the same time, so easily subjugated or 
tamed, we cannot but see the wisdom and 
goodness of Divine Providence. We know 
not, it is true, the means employed by man in 
the infancy of society in reclaiming the original 


INTRODUCTION. 19 


wild stocks, but we know that it was accom- 
plished, and we see that one animal after 
another was added to the catalogue of his 
humble subjects, while, at the same time, 
empires were in their dawn, cities arose, 
political power became concentrated in various 
given localities; the interchange of national 
productions gave impetus to improvement ; 
and the finer arts of life became developed 
from the rude germs of their primordial origin. 
At what precise point of time, or under what 
peculiar circumstances, our domestic animals 
respectively yielded to man’s great mastery, 
and submitted to his service, are points buried 
in oblivion ; nor is it needful that they should 
be minutely ascertained. We know enough 
to feel that, in these conquests, of more solid 
benefit than those of the sword, we are pre- 
sented with important considerations in the 
history of our species. And thus are we led 
to the axiom with which we started, that man 
began his career, not, as some philosophers 
tell us, in the character of a degraded savage, 
but in that of a benefactor to futurity. 

In the present work, we shall confine our 
observations to those of the feathered race 
which come under the general name of 


20 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Domestic Poultry. We shall endeavour to 
treat the subject in a popular and interesting 
manner, divesting scientific details of that 
obscurity which, from the use of technicalities, 
the general reader too frequently complains is 
thrown around them. 


DOMESTIC POULTRY. 


Domestic poultry may be divided into three 
distinct groups,—first, the Gallinaceous group, 
of which the fowl, peacock, turkey, ete., are 
examples ; secondly, the Columbine, or pigeon 
group, of which our domestic species are 
limited in number ; and thirdly, the Aquatic 
group, domestic waterfowl, of which the swan, 
duck, and goose are familiar examples. 

In habits, manners, instincts, and structural 
peculiarities, these three groups differ in very 
essential particulars. 


THE GALLINACEOUS GROUP. 


Though many of the gallinaceous birds 
perch on trees, yet, in their characteristic 
habits they are birds of the ground; it is 
there that they search for their food, which 
consists of grains, seeds, root, especially those 


THE GALLINACECUS GROUP. 21 


of a bulbous nature, berries, the tender tops 
of vegetables, not excluding insects, and their 
larvee, worms, and the like. Their limbs are 
strong and muscular, enabling them to run 
with ease; the tarsi or legs are covered with 
strong scales, and, in the males of many species, 
are armed witha sharp horny spur. The three 
anterior toes are furnished with strong claws, 
the hind toe is short, its point only touching 
the ground, and in some species it is wanting. 
From the muscularity of the limbs and the 
strength of the claws, the birds of this group 
are for the most part capable of scratching up 
the surface of the ground in quest of grains 
or insects; many delight to throw the dust 
over their plumage, and wallow in the dry 
gravel or sandy earth. Swampy, humid 
situations are their aversion, and a continuance 
of heavy rains renders them dull and dis- 
spirited. As might be inferred from the 
nature of their food, the gallinaceous birds 
have a stout horny beak, with a tough mem-_ 
brane at the base, in which the nostrils are 
situated. The form of the body is plump, 
stout, and broad, with an ample breast. The 
powers of flight are very moderate, and in 
most the wings are short, concave, and 


22 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS, 


rounded. In some, however, as the grouse 
tribe, they are pointed; but even in these 
flight is not performed without considerable 
exertion, and a rapid vibration of the wings, 
accompanied by a loud whirring. ‘To those who 
have ‘“‘ put up”’ pheasants or coveys of partridges 
this almost startling sound is familiar. J 

In the gallinaceous group there is a great 
tendency to the development of naked combs 
and wattles, and various naked fleshy or mem- 
branous caruncles about the head; the fowl 
has a comb, wattles, and a naked space on the 
sides of the cheeks; but in the turkey we see 
the naked carunculated appendages much more 
extensive. 

To the present group of birds one par- 
ticularity in their internal structure is a 
strong muscular gizzard, lined with a tough 
leathery membrane. By the action of the 
two thick muscular sides of this gizzard on 
each other, the seeds and grains swallowed, 
(and previously macerated in the crop, and 
there softened by a peculiar secretion oozing 
from glandular pores,) are ground up, or 
triturated, in order that their due digestion 
may take place. It is a remarkable fact that 
these birds are in the habit. of swallowing 


THE GALLINACEOUS GROUP. 23 


small pebbles, bits of gravel, and similar sub- 
stances, which it would seem are essential to 
their health. The definite use of these sub- 
stances, which are certainly ground down by 
the mill-like action of the gizzard, has been a 
matter of difference among various physi- 
ologists, and many experiments, with a view 
to elucidate the subject, have been undertaken. 
It was sufficiently proved by Spallanzani that 
the digestive fluid was incapable of dissolving 
grains of barley, etc., in their unbruised state, 
and this he ascertained by filling small hollow 
and perforated balls and tubes of metal or 
glass with grain, and causing them to be 
swallowed by turkeys and other fowls; when 
examined, after twenty-four and forty-eight 
hours, the grains were found to be unaflected 
by the gastric fluid; but when he filled 
similar balls and tubes with bruised grains, 
and caused them to be swallowed, he found, 
after a lapse of the same number of hours, 
that they were more or less dissolved by the 
action of the gastric juice. In other experi- 
ments, he found that metallic tubes introduced 
at the gizzard of common fowls and turkeys, 
were bruised, crushed, and distorted, and even 
that sharp-cutting instraments were broken 


24 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


up into blunt fragments, without having pro- 
duced the slightest injury to the gizzard. But 
these experiments go rather to prove the ex- 
traordinary force and grinding powers of the 
gizzard, than to throw light upon the positive 
use of the pebbles swallowed; which, after all, 
Spallanzani thought were swallowed without 
any definite object, but from mere stupidity. 
Blumenbach and Dr. Bostock aver that fowls, 
however well supplied with food, grow lean 
without them, and to this we can bear our 
own testimony. Yet the question, what is 
their precise effect, remains to be answered. 
Boerhaave thought it probable that they might 
act as absorbents to superabundant acid; 
others have regarded them as irritants or 
stimulants to digestion ; and Borelli supposed 
that they might really contribute some degree 
of nutriment. John Hunter, in his treatise 
“On the Animal Economy,” after noticing the 
grinding powers of the gizzard, says, in refer- 
ence to the pebbles swallowed, ‘“ We are not, 
however, to conclude that stones are entirely 
useless ; for if we compare the strength of the 
muscles of the jaws of animals who masticate 
their food, with those of birds who do not, we 
shall say that the parts are well calculated for 


THE GALLINACEOUS GROUP. 25 


the purpose of mastication; yet we are not 
thence to infer that the teeth in such jaws are 
useless, even although we have proof that the 
gums do the business when the teeth are gone. 
If pebbles are of use, which we may reasonably 
conclude they are, birds have an advantage 
over animals having teeth, so far as pebbles are 
always to be found, while the teeth are not re- 
newed. If we constantly find in an organ, sub- 
stances which can only be subservient to the 
functions of that organ, should we deny their 
use, although the part can do its office without 
them? The stones assist in grinding down the 
grain, and, by separating its parts, allow the 
gastric juice to come more readily in contact 
with it.” 

This we believe to be the true theory,—the 
pebbles assist in crushing the grain, and at the 
same time prevent it from consolidating into 
a thick, heavy, compacted mass, which would 
take a far longer time in undergoing the 
digestive process, than when separated and 
intermingled with the pebbles. 

The gallinaceous birds are very prolific, and 
most are polygamous. The nest is, as a rule, 
made upon the ground; the young are hatched 
covered with down, and in a few hours are 


26 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


capable of running about, and following their 
parent ; they pick up their food, to which 
the mother conducts them, without having to 
be fed like the young of the finches and 
warblers in their snug nests, till they acquire 
the power of flitting about. They repose at 
night huddled up beneath their parent’s wings. 

The males of the species composing the 
present group are extremely pugnacious, and 
will often fight with each other to the death 
of one of the rivals. The game-cock, the 
jungle-cock, the pheasant, and the quail, are 
notorious for their combative’ propensities. 
The females are devoted to their broods, and 
Jose all sense of personal danger in their de- 
fence; a hen will fly boldly in the face of a 
dog, and even the timid partridge will fight 
for its young. Mr. Selby records an instance 
in which a pair of partridges (for these birds 
are not polygamous) attacked a crow which 
had attempted to seize one of their brood; 
they fought not only courageously but success- 
fully, for they actually fastened upon and 
held their sable adversary ; and so absorbed 
were they in the strife, that they persisted in 
their hold till the spectator of the combat 
came to their aid, and seized upon the mis- 


THE COMMON FOWL. 27 


creant. Upon search, the young birds were 
found concealed in the grass around the scene 
of action. Of none of the gallinaceous birds 
is the flesh unfit for food. That of many 
is a delicacy, and at the same time highly 
nutritive and easily digestible. Pheasants, 
partridges, quails, and grouse need no recom- 
mendation. : 


THE COMMON FOWL. 


The common fowl, (Gallus domesticus— 
Ray.*) This valuable domestic bird, of which the 
varieties are extremely numerous, is doubtless 
derived from some of the wild or jungle fowls 
of India, and is, perhaps, crossed by more 
than one species. At what period, or by what 
people the wild jungle-fowl was reclaimed and 
brought to become a pensioner on the bounty 
of man, we have no means of ascertaining. 

* Jn the restricted genus, (Gallus) the head is ornamented in 
the male, and generally in the female, with a naked comb, single 
in the jungle-fowls and game domestic races, but in many do- 
mestic breeds double, or spread ina rose shape. Wattles, two. 
Spurs in the male. The tail consists of fourteen feathers, form- 
ing two vertical planes, making what is called a folded tail. In 
the male, the middle feathers are the longest, and fall over the 
others in a graceful arch. In some domestic breeds, the comb is 


small, and the top of the head elegantly plumed with a tuft of 
feathers, : 


28 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


But as the writers of antiquity speak of it as 
a bird long domesticated in their days; and 
extensively spread, we may justly conclude 
that its subjugation ranks amongst the remote 
of man’s peaceful conquests over the animal 
kingdom. Its domestication was probably 
first achieved in India, while, at the same time, 
in Malay, another species known as_ the 
Malay gigantic fowl, might have been also 
subjugated, and from these points distinct 
races, soon intermingling together, might have 
radiated. 

And here, perhaps, we may be permitted to 
take a review of the wild birds or species which 
may have contributed to the domestic varieties. 

Ist. The Malay gigantic fowl, (Gallus 
giganteus—Temminck.) This large and very 
remarkable species is a native of Java and 
Sumatra. The male bird in its natural atti- 
tude exceeds two feet in height, measuring 
from the top of the head to the ground. The 
comb is thick, and low, and destitute of serra- 
tions, appearing as if it had been partially 
cut off, the wattles are small, and the throat 
is bare. The neck is covered with elongated 
feathers or hackles, of a pale golden reddish 
colour, which advance upon the back, and 


THE COMMON FOWL. 29 


hackles of the same colour cover the rump, 
and drop on each side of the base of the tail. 
The middle of the back and the shoulders of 
the wings are of a dark chestnut, the feathers 
being of a loose texture. The greater wing 
coverts are of a glossy green, and form a bar 
of that colour across the wing. The primary 
and secondary quill feathers are yellowish, 
with a tinge of rufous. The tail feathers are 
of a glossy green. The under surface uni- 
formly is of a glossy blackish green, but the 
base of each feather is a chestnut, and this 
colour appears on the least derangement of 
the plumage. The limbs are remarkably stout, 
and the robust tarsi are of a yellow colour. 
The voice is a sort of crow—hoarse and short, 
and very different from the clear notes of de- 
fiance uttered by our farmyard chanticleer. 
This species has the habit, when fatigued, of 
resting on the tarsi or legs, as we have seen 
the emu do under similar circumstances. 

In some parts of continental India, this 
bird is domesticated, and is known to Euro- 
peans under the name of the Kulm Cock. In 
the proceedings of the Zool. Soc. for 1832, 
p- 151, we find the following notice respecting 
it by colonel Sykes, who observed it domesti- 


30 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


eated in the Dukhun (Deccan.) ‘“‘ Gallus gi- 
ganteus, Temm. ; Gall. Ind. 633: known by 
the name of the Kulm Cock by Europeans in 
India. Met with only as a domestic bird; 
and colonel Sykes has reason to believe that 
it is not a native of India, but has been intro- 
duced by the Mussulmans from Sumatra or 
Java. The iris of the real game-bird should 
be whitish or straw yellow. Colonel Sykes 
landed two cocks and a hen in England, in 
June, 1831. They bore the winter well; the 
hen laid freely, and has reared two broods of 
chickens. The cock has not the shrill clear 
pipe of the domestic bird, and his scale of 
notes appears more limited. A cock in the 
possession of colonel Sykes, stood twenty-six 
inches high to the crown of the head; but 
they attain a greater height. Length from 
the tip of the bill to the insertion of the tail, 
twenty-three inches. Hen, one-third smaller 
than the male. Shaw very justly describes 
the habit of the cock, of resting when tired 
on the first joint cf the leg.” 

Within the last few years, other examples 
of this giant race have been brought to Eng- 
land, and we believe that the breed is kept up 
in the royal aviary at Windsor, The various 


THE COMMON FOWL. él 


specimens which we have seen, some of very 
large size, had little in our eyes, stature ex- 
cepted, to recommend them ;—their contour 
seemed to be destitute of compactness, there 
was no energy in their movements ;—the proud 
strut, the spirited action, the elegant sym- 
metry, the animated aspect, so conspicuous in 
the high-bred game race of our country, or 
some of the bold but diminutive bantam. 
breeds, was wanting. 

2ndly. The Javanese jungle-fowl, (Gallus 
Bankiva.) This species, the Ayam-utan of 
the Malays, is a native of Java; but either a 
variety or a distinct species of larger size, yet 
very similar in colouring, is found in conti- 
nental India. The Javanese or Bankiva jun- 
gle-fowl, is about the size of an ordinary 
bantam, and in plumage resembles the black- 
breasted red game-bird of our country, with a 
steel-blue mark across the wings. ‘The comb 
is high, its edge is deeply serrated, and the 
wattles are rather large. The hackle feathers 
of the neck and rump are long and of a glossy 
golden orange ; the shoulders are chestnut red, 
the greater wing-coverts deep steel-blue, the 
quill-feathers brownish black, edged with pale 
reddish yellow, or sandy red, ‘The tail is of a 


32 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


black colour with metallic reflections of green 
and blue. The under parts are black. The naked 
space round the eyes, the comb, and wattles are 
scarlet. The hen closely resembles a brown hen 
of the game breed, except in being very much 
smaller. That this bird, or its continental ally, 
is one of the sources—perhaps the main source 
—of our domestic race, cannot be doubted. It 
inter-breeds freely with our common poultry, 
and the progeny is fertile. Most beautiful 
cross-breeds between the Bankiva jungle-fowl 
and bantam may be seen in the gardens of ae 
Zoological Society. 

3dly. Sonnerat’s jungle-fowl, (Gallus Son- 
neratit.) This is the common jungle-fowl of 
continental India; it inhabits the woods, and 
is shy and vigilant. It exceeds in size the 
Bankiva jungle-fow], and in plumage and sym- 
metry is very beautiful. For spirit and deter- 
mination in combat it is highly celebrated, 
insomuch that Mussulman natives of India, 
who enter into the barbarous sport of cock 
fighting with incredible eagerness, are anxious 
to procure birds of this species, which they 
will match against others of the ordinary game 
breed, confident of the victory. It is easily 
domesticated; and living specimens are gene- 


THE COMMON FOWL. do 


rally to be seen in the gardens of the Zoological 
Society. 

In this splendid species, the comb of the 
male is large with its margin serrated; the 
wattles are rather ample, the hackles of the 
neck, and lower part of the back, and the wing 
coverts on the shoulders, have the shafts ex- 
panded into a thin cartilaginous, or rather 
horny plate, of a bright golden yellow, with 
a rich metallic gloss. These plates vary in 
shape, being in some feathers angular, in 
others oval, or almost circular. The plumage 
on the middle of the back, the breast, and 
under parts generally is a deep grey, each 
feather having a paler margin. The tail is of 
deep rich glossy green, with varied metallic 
reflections; bill and legs yellow. The females 
which have come under our notice were smaller 
than the males,—of a rich brown colour, 
beautifully speckled and marbled with darker 
pencillings: néither comb nor wattles were very 
apparent. In reference to Sonnerat’s jungle 
fowl, we find the following details in the pro- 
ceedings of the Zoological Society, 1832, p.151. 
This bird, observes colonel Sykes, is the Rahn 
Komrah of the Mahrattas. It is “ very abun- 
dant in the woods of the western Ghauts, where 

B 


84 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


there are cither two species or two very strongly 
marked varieties. In the valleys, at 2,000 
feet above the sea, Sonnerat’s species is found, 
slender, standing high on the legs, and with 
the yellow cartilaginous spots on the feathers, 
even in the female. In the belts of woods on 
the sides of mountains at 4,000 feet above the 
sea there is a short-legged variety; the male 
has a great deal of red in his plumage, which 
Sonnerat’s has not ; the female is of a reddish 
brown colour, and is without cartilaginous 
spots at all. In fact, the female of this variety 
is the Gallus Stanleyii of Mr. Gray’s ‘‘TIllus- 
trations,” eggs exactly like those of the 
domestic fowl in form and colour, but less in 
size. The wild hen would appear to sit ona 
much smaller number of eggs than the domes- 
tic, as colonel Sykes shot a hen upon her nest, 
in which were only three eggs, and the process 
of incubation had evidently commenced some 
days.* In the craw and stomach of many 
birds, nothing whatever was found excepting 
the seeds of a stone-like hardness, called Job’s 
tears, (Coix barbaia,) Irides brownish deep 


* This might have been an accidental circumstance, anda 
Single instance is no proof that the wild hen sits on fewer eggs, 
or rears a less numerous progeny, than her domestic relative, 


THE COMMON FOWL. 35 


orange. The crow, or call of this species is 
Jike that of the bantam cock.” ‘Many of 
the (domestic) hens, particularly in the vil- 
lages of the Ghauts, are not to be distinguished 
from the wild bird (Sonnerat’s) excepting 
only in the want of the cartilaginous spot on 
the wing coverts.” 

Captain Thomas Skinner, in his Excursions 
in India, (1832,) thus notices the jungle-fowl, 
(Sonnerat’s) which he met with in abundance. 
‘In some parts of the forest, we saw several 
jungle-fowl ; they have the same habits as the 
domestic poultry ; the cock struts at the head 
of his hens, and keeps a strict watch over their 
safety. Whenever they were disturbed by our 
attempts upon them, he flew to the highest 
branch of some-tree beyond our reach, and 
crowed with all his might, while his dames 
ran into holes and corners to escape our 
attacks; they are so cunning that we found it 
impossible to get within shot of them, with all 
the caution we could use.” 

An amusing writer on “Sporting Scenes in 
India,” (N. M. Mag., 1829, p. 234,) speaking 
of the wild jungle-fowls, says that the sports- 
man may be successful in his attempts, ‘‘ by 
ascertaining from successive cries the way they 

BQ 


36 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


walk, and hurrying through the coyer by a 
circuitous route, so as to intercept them; but 
this requires a certain tact. ‘The slightest stir, 
and often the keenness of the bird’s sight, for 
they come slowly and look well around, as they 
strut, and flap their wings and challenge, are 
enough to discover the sportsman, when the 
crowing ceases, and they are off at a hopeless 
rate.’ He adds, ‘‘ these birds are the abori- 
ginal cock and hen, but neither their cry nor 
their plumage is that of the domestic fowl.” 
The capture of these birds, and also of other 
animals, is carried on by natives of a low caste, 
who gain.a livelihood by this despised oceu- 
pation. Johnson, in his “Sketches of Field 
Sports, as followed by the natives of India,” 
informs us that ‘“‘two or three of these men 
go for that purpose together, and proceed in 
this manner.—A line of thirty or forty yards 
long is fastened to the ground with wooden 
pegs at each extremity, and is then elevated 
by props to the height of about eighteen 
inches. ‘To this line nooses of horse hair are 
fastened at distances of about two feet from 
each other, and when the birds attempt to 
pass under the line, they are caught in the 
nooses by their necks, Sometimes a similar 


THE COMMON FOWL. 37 


line is fastened to the ground and left lying 
there, with all the nooses spread, and as the 
birds pass over them they are caught by the 
legs. These lines are never spread where 
there is much jungle. When the line or 
lines are ready, the men go off to a considerable 
distance and beat the bushes in a direction 
towards them.” 

We may here allude to some other species of 
jungle-fowl, as the fork-tailed cock of Java, 
(Gallus furcatus—Temm.) which has the throat 
adorned with only a single large wattle, spring- 
ing from the centre, and the bronzed cock of 
Sumatra, (Gallus ceneus,) which has a large 
comb, smooth along the ridge, and destitute 
of serrations. Neither of these birds has true 
hackles on the neck. 

Another species is the fire-backed pheasant, 
(Euplocamus ignitus—Temm.) This is a large 
species, standing high on the legs, with full 
crest on the head, and short feathers on the 
neck. The tail of the cock is folded as usual, 
but the first two feathers instead of being long, 
slender, and bending down, .scarcely exceed 
the rest, are broad, and just curved, reminding 
us of the tail of a high-bred bantam-cock, of 
sir John Sebright’s spangled breed. General 


38 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


plumage black, with reflections of steel blue, 
lower part of the back bright red, extending 
thence, like a zone round the body ; the middle 
tail feathers white, the rest black, with green 
reflections; legs, vermilion red; female, brown. 
This splendid bird is a native of Sumatra. 

With respect to the last three species, we 
believe that our naturalists regard them as 
having contributed to the domestie fowl ; 
indeed, with respect to the fire-backed pheasant, 
this species represents a form distinct from 
that of the true jungle-fowls, and must, theres 
fore, be considered out of the question. 

It is then, to the three preceding species 
that we must look. That the Kulm fowl of 
the Dukhun, and the gigantic Malay fowl, are 
identical we believe is generally admitted, and 
the breed appears to be more extensively spread 
in a domestic state than is supposed. In the 
proceedings of the Zoological Society, for 
1835, p. 92, we have the following notice 
relative to some Herat fowls presented to the 
society by Keith E. Abbott, Esq.—These were 
a cock and two hens of the fowls of Herat, in 
Khorassaun, a breed which Mr. Abbott believes 
is unknown in Europe. ‘They are young birds, 
of the real Herat race. These, it was stated, 


THE COMMON FOWL. 39 


(at the meeting) were apparently identical with 
the Kulm fowl of Dukhun, and the Malay 
fowl, the Gallus giganteus—Temm. 

Tiere then we have a domestic race, traceable 
to an aboriginal stock; and though it is not 
of general distribution, still, in all probabi- 
lity, it has at some time or other crossed with 
a breed from one of the smaller jungle-fowls, 
and thereby contributed to the increase of 
stature. That the Bankiva jungle-fowl of 
Java, or its larger continental variety, if it be 
not a distinct species, (and of which sir W. 
Jardine states that he has seen several speci- 
mens,) is one of the sources of our domestic 
breeds, cannot, we think, be for a moment 
doubted. It would be difficult to discover 
any difference between a clean-limbed black- 
breasted red bantam-cock, and a cock Bankiva 
jungle-fowl. Indeed, the very term bantam 
goes far to prove their specific identity: Bantam 
is a town or city at the bottom of a bay onthe 
northern coast of Java; it was first visited by 
the Portuguese, in 1511, at which time a great 
trade was carried on by the town with Arabia, 
Hindostan, and China; chiefly in pepper. 
Subsequently it fell into the hands of the Dutch, 
and was at one time the great rendezvous for 


40 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


European shipping. It is now a place of com- 
parative insignificance. 

From this it would seem that the jungle- 
fowls domesticated and sold to the Europeans 
at Bantam, continued to be designated by the 
name of the place where they were obtained, 
and in process of time the name was appro- 
priated to all our dwarfish breeds. 

Among the birds forming the collection in 
the Chinese museum, exhibited for some years 
at Hyde Park Corner, are specimens of the 
Bankiva jungle-fowl; of the species indige- 
nous in China, in a wild state, its range is 
more extensive than naturalists are aware of; 
it is, however, not improbable, that the speci- 
mens were imported into Canton from Java, and 
there sold with other specimens, some indige- 
nous, others from Malacca, to the proprietor 
of the museum. We are the more confirmed 
in this opinion, because we find the argus 
pheasant, a native of Malacca, Sumatra, etc, 
in the same collection. 

With respect to Sonnerat’s jungle-fowl, the 
ordinary jungle-fowl of continental India, 
though the traveller whose name it bears 
regarded it as the stock whence our domestic 
races sprung, we cannot say that such is our 


THE COMMON FOWL. 4] 


opinion. The laminated structure of the 
hackle feathers, and those of the shoulders, is 
never seen in any of our domestic breeds; 
moreover, the female has the throat clothed 
with feathers, and only a space round the eye 
bare. Nevertheless, we will not deny that, in 
some of the domestic varieties there may have 
been across with this species at some period 
or other, of which the distinctive marks have 
gradually become obsolete. 

This, then, is the sum and substance of our 
knowledge respecting the wild origin of the 
domestic fowl, of which various breeds are 
spread over the world. Still more are we in 
the dark as to the time and circumstances of 
its subjugation and dispersion. We have 
already advanced an opinion, from a casual 
and little-noticed expression in the first Book 
of Kings, that as early as the days of Solo- 
mon, the domestic fowl was kept in Judea, 
and that it was perhaps in a state of tame- 
ness long antecedently among the Egyptians. 
At a late period in Judea, the fowl, as nu- 
merous allusions prove, was common. The 
Saviour’s words to Peter, and the lamentation 
over Jerusalem, so full of beauty and pathos, 
**How often would I have gathered thy chil- 


42 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


dren together, as a hen gathereth her chickens 
under her wings, and ye would not!” are 
passages sufficiently corroborative. A few 
years, however, antecedently to the point of 
time to which these passages lead us, we find 
that, even in Britain, the domestic fowl was 
known. How it had reached this ultima thule, 
of which the Romans, previous to the inva- 
sion, or we might almost say, discovery by 
Julius Ceesar, were ignorant, it is difficult to 
determine. We cannot think that it was 
imported by the early tribes, Celtic or Belgic, 
who colonized our fertile land; they were no- 
madic people — warriors, scarcely knowing 
whither they went; if, however, we might 
hazard an opinion, it is to the Pheenicians— 
the merchants of Tyre, whose vessels brought 
the peacock to Solomon, and who were the 
great mariners of antiquity, that we owe the 
introduction of this valuable bird. A history 
of that wonderful people remains yet to be 
elaborated ; but that they were familiar with 
our western and scuthern coasts, and also with 
‘‘Erin’s green isle,” is, we believe, conceded 
by all antiquarians. Another inlet to the fowl 
might have been by the way of Gallia, (where, 
as Ceesar informs us, three settled nations 


THE COMMON FOWL. 48 


dwelt, dividing the land, in his days,) and 
between which country and Britain, there was 
a perpetual intercourse. Be this as it may, 
Ceesar notices the fowl as established in our 
island, and informs that, though it was kept 
for pleasure, it was forbidden by the Druids 
to be used as food. The goose,* the hare, 
and the fish of rivers were also among the 
forbidden meats. That the Romans, during 
their long domination, introduced various 
breeds of fowls, and perhaps other poultry 
into our island, may be easily believed; 
nevertheless, the fowl and the goose were 
domesticated here, on their arrival. The gems 
and coins of ancient Greece prove the remote- 
ness of time at which the domestic fowl was 
a familiar denizen in that country. The cock 
was dedicated to several of the Grecian gods, 
as Apollo, Mars, Mercury, Aisculapius, etce., 
and our readers may remember that, in his 
dying hour, the great Socrates—perhaps in 
irony, perhaps from some feelings connected 
with early associations—reminded his friends 
that he owed a cock to Aisculapius. The 
watchfulness, spirit, and prowess of the bird 


* We have here a proof that the goose was kept domesticated 
in England from a very early epoch. 


44 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


were no doubt its recommendations. The 
Greek names of the fowl are Alectryon, 
(dXexrpuoy,) and Alectoris, (ddexropis,) but it 
was also called the Persian bird, (Iepouxds dpyis,) 
and Aristophanes (Birds) introduces one of 
his characters as showing how the cock had 
reigned in Persia before Darius and Megabyzus, 
a circumstance which goes some way to prove 
the westward radiation of the fowl from its 
Indian cradle. Various breeds for the combat 
were highly esteemed in Greece. Those of 
Tanagra Delos, and Rhodes, also of Chalcis, 
Media, Persia, and the neighbourhood of 
Alexandria, were in high repute. The Romans, 
who imitated the Greeks in so many points, 
adopted, among others, the savage amusement 
of cock-fighting, so consonant to the taste of 
a populace whose greatest delight was in the 
combats of a blood-stained arena, where men 
and beasts fell in mortal strife to gratify the 
lust of slaughter. But the delicacy of the 
flesh of these birds was by no means over- 
looked by the Romans in the days of their 
luxury, when exorbitant sums were lavished 
upon the pleasures of the table, and the nobles 
vied with each other in the senseless extrava- 
gance of their entertainments. In order to 


THE COMMON FOWL. 45 


improve the whiteness and delicacy of their 
flesh, fowls and capons were fed in the dark 
upon meal, for the gratification of the palate 
of the epicure. A ‘‘barn-door chuckie,’ we 
think, would have been ten times more pre- 
ferable; however, on the score of fattening 
and cramming, and torturing poultry, neither 
we of England, nor our neighbours of France, 
have a syllable to utter against the ancient 
Romans. . 

If in ancient Greece and Rome cock-fighting 
were a favourite amusement, not less so has it 
been in England. The practice was not im- 
probably introduced into our island by the 
Romans, when they established here their 
language and their customs. Be this as it 
may, it is only within this last few years that 
this barbarous sport has become neglected, 
and that the cockpits have been deserted. 
Not that the cruel practice is quite obsolete, 
for there are a few still who delight in the 
mortal combat of the feathered champions, 
and keep up the game breeds in their purity. 
In India, China, Malacca, and the Greek 
islands, this sport is carried on with the 
utmost ardour. In Sumatra, indeed, it is 
pursued with an excitement bordering upon 


46 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


mania; and we are credibly informed, “ that 
instances have occurred of a father staking his 
children or wife, and a son his mother and 
sisters, on the issue of a battle.” 

Of the utility of the fowl as an article of 
food, and of the goodness of its eggs, little 
need here be said ;—all are aware of the vast 
numbers of the former consumed in the metro- 
polis alone; and with respect to the latter, 
thousands are annually imported from France 
to meet the demands of the market. In all 
ages, the cock has been celebrated as the har- 
binger of morn, the herald of the sun, whose 
clarion sounds before the break of day. 
“Watch ye, therefore,” says our Saviour, ‘‘for 
ye know not when the master of the house 
cometh; at even, or at midnight, or at the 
cock-crowing, or in the morning.” 

Though the common fowl is now widely 
spread, it is not adapted for the high boreal 
regions. It is not found to breed in the north- 
ern parts of Siberia, and in Iceland is kept 
only as a rarity. The manners of the ordinary 
fowl are too well known to require comment, 
—their mode of scratching the earth in quest 
of insects, their fondness for dusting their 
plumage, the proud strut of the cock at the 


THE COMMON FOWL. 47 


head of his train, his jealousy of a rival, his 
attention, and the peculiar note with which 
he calls the hens to partake of some choice 
morsel which he has discovered or scratched 
up, have been noticed again and again by all 
familiar with that interesting spot, a well- 
arranged farm-yard. After laying her egg, on 
leaving the nest, the hen utters a loud cackling 
cry, to which the cock often responds in a 
high-toned kind of scream. The number of 
eges laid by a single hen during the spring 
and summer months, varies according to cir- 
cumstances—as diet, a suitable locality, ete., 
but she can only cover in sitting from twelve 
to sixteen. The chick breaks the egg on thé 
twenty-first day ; in a few hours it is lively 
and active. 

It is not only under the natural parent, whose 
patience, care, and anxiety are proverbial, that 
the eggs of the fowl are capable of being 
hatched. Artificial means have been and are 
successfully used, both in France and in 
England; and, as is well known, an establish- 
ment for hatching eggs has been long main- 
tained in Egypt, from which thousands of 
fowls are annually distributed. The uni- 
formity of the atmospheric temperature in 


48 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Egypt no doubt contributes much to success ; 
but in our variable climate, the Eccaleobion * 
machine, invented by Mr. Bucknell, has been 
found to answer most admirably. This ma- 
chine resembles an oblong box nine feet in 
length, three in breath, and three in height ; 
it is placed on a table, and is warmed by 
means of an internal apparatus capable of being 
so regulated, that any degree of temperature 
may be maintained, from that of the atmo- 
sphere to that of 300 degrees of Fahrenheit. 
It is capable of containing two thousand eggs. 
Many thousand chickens have been matured 
in the egg by this machine ; and could it be 
brought into general use, considerable advan- 
tage might result from its employment. Mr. 
Bucknell, in his ‘Treatise on Artificial Incu- | 
bation,” makes the following observations :— 
«It must have struck even the most superficial 
observer, that the extraordinary fecundity of 
gallinaceous fowls is a wise and most beneyo- 
lent dispensation of nature, to provide more 
abundantly food for man; as in those tribes 
of birds not suited to his table, the female 
lays no more eggs than she can incubate.+ 


* ExkaXew, (eccaleo) to call forth —Bcos, (bios) life. 
} This is not quite correct; the pigeon, the partridge, the 


THE COMMON FOWL. 49 


With respect, therefore, to domestic poultry, 
the (perhaps) most nutritious of all human 
food, this rich provision of bounteous Provi- 
dence is for the first time available to Europe.” 
That is, by means of the Eccaleobion. ‘‘ We 
call the Egyptians barbarous: the procuring, 
however, by art and industry, of that neces- 
sary of life, good animal food, is no evidence 
of barbarism. If the population of the united 
kingdom, which, as respects Egypt, is as 
twenty-four to two, were as well supplied with 
this artificial production as Egypt, it would 
require, not ninety-two millions, but one 
thousand one hundred and four millions of 
poultry annually, for them to be as well-fed in 
this respect as the uncivilized natives of Egypt. 
But how stands the account on this matter? 
Full one-third of our population subsist almost 
entirely, or rather starve, upon potatoes alone ; 
another third have, in addition to this edible, 
oaten or inferior wheaten bread, with one or 
two meals of fat pork or the refuse of the 
shambles, per week; while a considerable 
quail, the pheasant, the grouse, etc, lay no more eggs than 
they can incubate, nor does the fowl in a state of nature; yet 
these birds are delicacies of the table. That the fowl should 


be so constituted as to lay, while ina state of domestication, 
more eggs than she can incubate, is a wise provision. 


50 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


majority of the remaining third seldom are 
able to procure an ample daily supply of good 
butchers’ meat, or obtain the luxury of poultry 
from year to year. On the continent of 
Europe, the population is still in a worse con- 
dition ;—fish, soups made from herbs, a stuff 
called bread, made from every variety of grain, 
black and brown, hard and sour, such as no 
Englishman could eat,—olives, chestnuts, the 
pulpy saecharine fruits; roots, stalks, and 
leaves, and not unfrequently the bark of 
trees ;—sawdust, blubber, train-oil, with frogs 
and snails, make up and constitute a good 
part of the food of the greater portion of 
the inhabitants of Europe. There is no other 
cause for this than the excessive ignorance 
of its population.” 

We think that Mr. Bucknell draws his pic- 
ture alittle too strong ; and we cannot help sus- 
pecting that his Eccaleobion would not prove a 
panacea for the catalogue of evils he enumer- 
ates, though one were kept for the wholesale 
hatching of fowls in every village. In France, 
M. Réaumur pursued a long and varied series 
of experiments on the artificial means of hatch- 
ing the eggs of poultry, the details of which 
he narrates at full, but which would here 


THE COMMON FOWL. 51 


cecupy too much space to transcribe : suffice it 
to say, that he found a room situated over, 
and receiving heat from, the bread-ovens of a 
benevolent institution in Paris, the tempera- 
ture of which was uniform, and easily regu- 
lated, to answer admirably; and there is no 
doubt but that hatching-chambers might be 
easily constructed on a similar principle. The 
necessary temperature, to be maintained -as 
equally as possible, is about 96° of Fahren- 
heit. It is by a nice management of the 
temperature, and by that skill which arises 
from long practice, that the Egyptians, who 
profess the business, are so successful. There 
are people residing at the village of Berme and 
a few adjoining places in the Delta; and 
generation after generation they follow the 
same business: they make a mystery of it, 
and no one but these people are allowed to 
practise it. There are in the different districts 
of Egypt, about three hundred and eighty-six 
egg-ovens, or mamals, each managed by a 
Bermean, who is regularly licensed by the 
aga of Berme, and pays ten crowns for his 
certificate. Consequently, the number of ovens 
and practitioners cannot be increased without 
the approbation and licence of the aga. In 


52 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 

each of these ovens, six or eight broods are 
annually hatched, and each brood consists 
of from forty thousand to eighty thousand 
chickens. The Bermean guarantees two-thirds 
of the eggs with which he is entrusted by the 
proprietor, who speculates in fowls; and if 
any overplus eggs are hatched, the chickens 
are the perquisite of the Bermean, who, be- 
sides, receives his board, and thirty or forty 
crowns for about six months’ service. 

The Egyptian egg-ovens are made of brick, 
and may be described as follows:—Let us 
suppose a passage or gallery, about three feet 
wide, and nine feet high, with a round hole 
for an entrance instead of a door, running 
through the centre of a low building; on each 
side of this gallery are the chambers, arranged 
in two rows, a lower and an upper one, all of 
the same size, namely, four or five feet in 
breadth, twelve or fifteen in length, and three 
in height ; each of these chambers is entered 
from the central gallery by means of a circular 
hole, just capable of admitting a man to creep 
through ; consequently there are two rows of 
holes along the gallery. Each pair of rooms, 
namely, the under and upper, communicate by 
means of a similar hole in the centre of the 


THE COMMON FOWL. 53 


ceiling of the under room, which of course 
forms the floor of the upper room. The use 
of these two rooms is different. In the lower 
room the eggs, to the number of four or five 
thousand, are placed upon a bed of flax, or a 
large mat, and in the upper room is placed 
the fire, the heat of which communicates 
through the hole to the lower room, the tem- 
perature of which it duly raises. The fire- 
place is a sort of gutter, about two inches deep 
and six inches wide, running round two or 
three sides of the floor. The material used for 
burning consists of the dried dung of camels 
or oxen mixed with straw, and formed into 
compact cakes. These burn slowly, and the 
heat produced is easily controlled. The smoke 
escapes through the round entrance hole into 
the gallery, and thence through openings in 
the arched top of the gallery itself. The fire 
is not always kept burning, but only for an 
hour night and morning, and if the tempera- 
ture require, perhaps for an hour in the day 
besides. When the smoke from the fires of 
the several upper rooms has passed away, all 
the round openings into the gallery are stuffed 
up with bundles of coarse tow, which 
effectually confines the heat, far more so than 


54 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


a wooden door would. According to the 
weather, this routine is kept up for eight, ten, 
or twelve days; the fires are then altogether 
discontinued, the heat retained in the ovens 
being sufficient to maintain the necessary 
temperature. As the time of hatching draws 
nigh, a number of the eggs are now removed 
from the lower tier of rooms, and put into the 
upper rooms, and all are more spread out, to 
allow the unimpeded exit of the chickens from 
the shell, which takes place on the twenty-first 
day ; and which, if the eggs were all huddled 
together, would be attended with some diffi- 
culty. Thus, without a thermometer to appeal 
to, and trusting to his own sensations as a 
guide in the regulation of temperature, and to 
tact, the result of experience, for management, 
does the Bermean successfully exercise his art, 
which has descended in Egypt from times of 
antiquity, surviving every change. That such 
a plan would succeed in our humid, changeable 
climate is, indeed, very problematical, nor is it 
ever likely to be attempted. 

All birds require, while young, the mother’s 
care; and though the true gallinaceous birds 
feed themselves in the course of a few hours 
after exclusion from the egg, still they need 


THE COMMON FOWL. 55 


from time to time her fostering warmth, and 
huddle together under the shelter of her wings. 
Réaumur, while pursuing his experiments 
on the artificial hatching of eggs, found it 
necessary to have recourse to some means of 
supplying the deficiency in this respect, and 
thereby atone for the want of maternal care. 
While crouching under the hen, the backs of 
the chickens are necessarily more warmed than 
the under parts; and he found, by experience, 
that in his contrivances, this principle must 
be always kept in view, and after several trials 
adopted a sort of box lined with sheep-skin, 
dressed with the wool on it. The top of this 
box sloped like a writing desk, and it was 
attached to, or rather inclosed within, a sort 
of large cage made of willow-grating, or net 
work, in which the chickens fed and played. 
At both ends, the box was open, allowing the 
chickens to enter, and its sloping top rendered 
it commodious for chickens of different sizes, 
In this simple apparatus, which Réaumur 
designated an artificial mother, the chickens 
slept at night; and they often resorted to it 
during the day, and as the smallest could 
easily escape at the lowest end, they were in 
no danger of being squeezed or crushed by 


56 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


their larger companions. On this apparatus 
Réaumur afterwards made several improve- 
ments, with a view to convenience, and the 
safety of the young brood. Another appara- 
tus consisted of a stove inclosed with netting 
for safety, surrounded by a sort of covered run, 
into which the brood could enter for warmth. 
The warmth of the stove served also to hatch 
fresh broods, the eggs being ranged over it.* 

To the apparatus intended for young ducks 
or geese an additional compartment of turf 
sloping to a small pond was requisite. 

In our island} many different breeds of 
fowls are distinguished, prized by amateurs, 
and several counties have been long celebrated 
for the size and excellency of their poultry ; 
as for example, Sussex and Surrey. The 
Sussex fowls are of large size and fine flavour, 
but inclined to be long in the body. The 
breed around Dorking, in Surrey, is of great 
antiquity, and supposed by some to have been 
introduced by the Romans. A pure Dorking 


* Some breeders of fowls in England use artificial mothers 
for their brood hatched in the natural way, and they may be 
resorted to very advantageously when any accident has happened 
to the hen. 

+ France has, in the peninsula of Caux, a peculiar and valued 
breed of fowls, which are fattened in the environs of Barbézieux 
La Fléche, and especially Mans, for the table. 


THE COMMON FOWL. 57 


fowl is of large size, and rounded contour ; 
and furnished with one or more additional but 
imperfect toes; the legs are short, and the 
plumage white. The breed has been of late 
years much crossed with the ordinary dung- 
hill fowl, and with the Sussex race, without 
any deterioration. The flesh is remarkable 
for whiteness, and delicacy of flavour. Vast 
numbers of these fowls are regularly sent to 
the London markets. 

A breed of fowls often seen around London 
is termed the Spanish. These fowls are of a 
very large size, and the hens lay enormous 
eggs, but do not sit well. The plumage is 
black, the comb large, and often pendulous, 
and the naked skin behind the ears white. 
There is also a black Poland or Hamburg 
breed, with a large top-knot of long white 
feathers. Two breeds remarkable for beauty 
of plumage, are the gold-spangled and silver- 
spangled Polands. These have small combs 
on the forehead, and a full top-knot of feathers 
on the crown. Fine fowls of these breeds are 
highly valued. 

From Persia, it would appear, is derived 
the rumpless or Persian breed, in which not 
only are the tail-feathers wanting, but the tail 


58 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


itself. Fowls of this breed lay well, but are 
not pleasing in appearance. Another breed, 
known as the Friesland, is remarkable, from 
having all the feathers frizzled or curled up 
the wrong way. The appearance of these 
fowls is very unsightly. This breed occurs 
not only in Europe, but in the Deccan, and in 
Java and Sumatra. From Japan and China 
has been obtained the silk-fowl, so called from 
its plumage, which is white, being all discom- 
posed and loose, and of a silky appearance. 
The comb and wattles are purple, and the 
periosteum, or membrane covering the bones, 
is black. 

There is also another breed from India, of 
which we have seen several examples in which 
the plumage is as usual, but the comb, wattles, 
and skin, are of a dull purple-blue, and the 
periosteum black. ‘This variety is the Gallus 
Morio of Temminck, and has been supposed, 
but on no good grounds, to be a distinct spe- 
cies. The flesh of this fowl, notwithstanding 
the colour of the skin and bones, is white and 
delicate. 

No breed is so handsome as the true game 
race. The plumage is brilliant, the figure 
admirable, and the gait stately. The flesh is 


THE COMMON FOWL. 59 


delicately white, and of the finest flavour. 
The pugnacity of these fowls is very great, 
rendering it troublesome to rear them, and we 
have more than once known a whole brood of 
young game chickens more or less injured, 
and some killed on the spot, from fighting 
among themselves. 

Of the bantam breeds, one is game, and 
resembles the game fowl, excepting in size; 
another breed is feathered to the very toes, 
the feathers on the tarsi, or beam of the leg, 
being long and stiff, and often brushing the 
ground. 

A bantam breed with clean legs, and of 
most elegantly spangled plumage, has been 
brought to perfection by sir John Sebright. 
The attitude of the cock is singularly bold and 
proud, the head being often thrown so much 
back as to meet the tail-feathers, which are 
simple, like those of a hen, the ordinary sickle- 
like feathers being abbreviated and broad. 
This elegant little breed is in great request. 

Such are the principal varieties of the com- 
mon fowls to be observed in our island. They 
owe their origin to the breeder’s skill, and, to 
be kept up in perfection, requires care, and 
judgment, 


60 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Fowls are casily kept ; even in some of the 
streets of London we see them, but they are 
miserable and dirty, and roost at night, for 
the most part, in cellars, into which they de- 
scend on the approach of evening, accustomed, 
by use, to seek an underground asylum. We 
have often pitied the poor birds, whose dirty 
ragged plumage, dull eyes, and colourless 
combs, bespeak the want of air, and of proper 
food, and the evils of damp, and of muddy 
puddles. How different from the tenants of 
the farm-yard, with fields and green lanes 
around,—with pure air to breathe, plenty of 
good food, and clear water to drink! Where 
a farm-yard dees not offer its advantages, a 
poultry-yard is a good substitute. This should 
be commodious and dry, and so sloping that 
no water lodges after rain, forming unwhole-- 
some puddles. It should have a warm aspect, 
and be sheltered from the cold winds. Ashes 
or sand should be stored in one corner for the 
fowls to roll in and clear their feathers from 
annoying vermin. If possible, they should 
have access to a fresh running streamlet, but 
pure clear water is indispensable. A dry com- 
mon or fields, in which they may freely wander 
and pick up grubs, insects, ants’ eggs, and the 


THE COMMON FOWL. 61 


leaves of plants, of which they are very fond, 
is a great advantage. From these excursions, 
so productive of health, they may be accus- 
tomed to return at a call. Poultry require a 
liberal supply of grain, and the best and 
heaviest corn is cheaper in the end than that 
of inferior quality: on this depend their size, 
the goodness and sapidity of their flesh, and the 
richness of the eggs. In Surrey, barley is the 
usual grain given, excepting during the time of 
incubation, when the sitting hens have oats, as 
being less heating to the system than theformer. 

With respect to the fowl-house, it should 
be dry and airy, but at the same time warm 
and well secured from weasels or rats, or from 
the incursions of the cat or fox. The perches 
~ should be conveniently arranged, quite hori- 
zontal, and of a thickness sufficient for the 
birds to clasp firmly. For laying-chambers, 
wooden boxes, with an entrance sufficient to 
admit the hen easily, and a ledge before it, are 
very convenient ; these should be ranged round 
the wall, at about three feet from the ground. 
Some use wicker baskets fastened to the wall 
at a convenient height. Wheaten, or rye, 
or oaten straw should form the nest, never 
hay, which is too hot, and favourable besides 


62 OUR DOMFSTIC FOWLS. 


for the increase of vermin. The boxes or 
baskets in which the hens incubate should be 
as secluded as possible, and free from intrusion. 
The number of eggs may vary from twelve to 
sixteen, but should never exceed the latter; 
they should not be stirred, except by the 
hen, and more especially when incubation 
has proceeded for some time, lest the position 
of the chick be interfered with, for if taken 
up a little time before the exit of the chick, 
and incautiously replaced with the large end 
lowermost, the chick from its position will not 
be able to chip the shell, and must, therefore, 
perish. The forepart of the chick, be it 
observed, is towards the biggest end of the 
eggs, and it is so placed in the shell that the 
beak is always uppermost. Yet doubled up 
as the chick is in its close prison, it is enabled 
by its efforts to break the shell at the appointed 
time, and to this end its yet soft beak is fur- 
nished just above the point of the upper man- 
dible with a small, hard, horny scale,* which, 
from the position of the head, as Mr. Yarrell 
observes, is brought in contact with the 
inner surface of the shell. The position of 


* This little horny scale in the course of a short time peels 
off, but may be always seen on the beaks of newly-hatched 
chickens, 


THE COMMON FOWL. 63 


the bill peeping from under the wing remaining 
unaltered, the shell (greatly thinned and 
weakened by absorption during incubation, ) 
is at length broken in one spot; this done, 
the impatient chick turns gradually, almost or 
entirely completing a revolution, the bill con- 
tinuing to extend the fracture, which takes 
place circularly round the large end, about two 
thirds distant from the extremity of the small 
end. Sometimes before the fracture is fully 
complete the chick is enabled to make its exit, 
completing the fracture by its endeavours to 
push through. The length of time required 
for this process varies from an hour to six, 
and sometimes to twenty-four. In some in- 
stances, when the chick is weak and is unable 
to complete the fracture of the shell, or when 
the body sticking to the shell prevents it from 
accomplishing its circular revolution, the chick 
must be cautiously extricated. After gradually 
chipping the shell, the portions glued by the 
hardened white or albumen to the chick, if 
such there be, must be removed by means of 
a pair of delicate scissors. 

‘When the chick,” says Réaumur, ‘‘is en- 
tirely or almost out of the shell, it draws its 
head from under its wing, where it had hitherto 


64. OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


been placed, stretches out its neck, directing it 
forwards, but for several minutes is unable to 
raise it. On seeing for the first time a chick 
in this condition we are led to infer that its 
strength is exhausted, and that it is ready to 
expire; but in most cases it recruits rapidly, 
its organs acquire strength, and in a very short 
time it appears quite another creature. After 
having dragged itself on its legs a little while, 
it becomes capable of standing on them, and 
of lifting up its neck, and bending it in 
various directions, and at length of holding up 
its head. At this period the feathers are 
merely fine down, but as they are wet with 
the fluid of the egg the chick appears almost 
naked. From the multitude of their branch- 
lets, these down feathers resemble minute 
shrubs; when, however, these branchlets are 
wet and sticking to each other, they take up 
but very little room ; as they dry they become 
disentangled and separated. The branchlets, 
plumules, or beards of each feather are at first 
inclosed in a membranous tube, by which they 
are pressed and kept close together, but as 
socn as this dries it splits asunder, an effect 
assisted also by the elasticity of the plumules 
themselves, which causes them to recede and 


THE COMMON FOWL. bd 


spread themselves out. This being accom- 
plished, each down feather extends over a con- 
siderable space, and when they all become 
dry and straight, the chick appears completely 
clothed in a warm vestment of soft down.” 

It is usual as the chicks in turn make 
their exit from the egg to remove them, and 
keep them warmly covered up, till all are ex- 
cluded and the hen is ready to take them 
under her charge altogether. Within twenty- 
four hours they begin to pick, and should be 
supplied with crumbs of bread, soaked in milk, 
egg boiled hard and chopped small, grits, and 
other grain. It is desirable to keep the 
chickens for the first week or ten days with 
the hen under cover, in some convenient 
place, so that the former may not be exposed 
to wet or to sudden changes of temperature, 
to which in the spring more especially they 
will be liable, and when during a_ sunny 
morning they are allowed to run about, the 
hen should be secured under a wicker coop, 
lest she should wander abroad, followed by 
her brood, to their risk, from various causes, 
The clucking note by which the hen calls her 

brood around her, and her fearlessness and 
- self-devotion in their defence, are universally 

c 


66 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


known. Chickens hatched in the spring or 
summer begin to lay eggs early in the following 
spring ; if, however, pullets hatched early in 
March be plentifully fed, they will sometimes 
lay eggs’ in the autumn of the same year. 

Of the excellency of the flesh of the fowl 
nothing need be said; it is not always, how- 
ever, that a young well-fed barn-door fowl is 
to be obtained, for the usual plan of the poul- 
terer is to fatten the birds for the market ; 
this practice if carried to a moderate extent is 
not objectionable, but they are often fed 
largely upon grease, and even crammed, by - 
which means they become loaded with rank 
and disagreeable fat, to the deterioration of 
the flavour of the flesh.* 

In France, the practice of cramming fowls 
is very common. ‘The poor victims are mer- 
cilessly treated, they are kept in a dark place, 
or even deprived of sight, and closely impri- 
soned in one attitude, their heads, wings, and 
under parts are plucked, and at stated times 
food, by means of a sort of force-pump, is 
crammed down their throats, an assistant 


* A well-fatted capon will often weigh seven or eight pounds, 
and sometimes nine or even ten. In France, capons are taught 
not ouly to hatch eggs, but to rear and watch over the chickens, 
and it is said they make excellent nurses, 


THE COMMON FOWL. 67 


holding the beak open, while the operator 
introduces the tube into the throat. Nor is 
this the only barbarity to which fowls on the 
Continent are subjected, sometimes even in 
England. But we shall not enter into details 
of cruelty. 

Fowls are subject to various diseases, most 
of them arising from damp, cold, and improper 
food. Severe catarrhal affections, swelled 
heads, dropsy of the limbs, rheumatism, or 
the pip, or thrush, are among the number. 
The latter is to be cured by washing the tongue 
and mouth with borax dissolved in tincture of 
myrrh and water. 

There is one disease called the gapes, to 
which domestic poultry, and also pheasants 
and partridges, are subject, and which often 
causes great mortality. Perhaps in the first 
instance it arises from a cold or a croupy or 
catarrhal affection, but in every case several 
parasitic worms of a singular form and structure 
will be found lodged in the windpipe, the 
removal of which (and it can be sometimes 
done by means of a feather introduced into the 
windpipe and turned round,) is requisite to 
save the sufferer. It may be that these worms 
are the sole cause of the disease. One mode 

2 


a 


68 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


of destroying these worms is by putting the 
birds in a box, and making them inhale the 
fumes of tobacco, blown into the box through 
the stalk of a tobacco-pipe. A pinch of salt 
put as far back into the mouth as possible, is 
also said to be effectual. The worm in ques- 
tion is the Syngamus trachealis, or Distoma 
lineare. It consists of a long and a short body 
united together; the long body is the female, 
the short body the male; each, were it not 
that they are permanently united together, 
being a truly distinct individual. How these 
noxious parasites become introduced into the 
trachea of gallinaceous birds is a mystery. But 
such is the fact. The fowl will breed, as is 
well known, with the pheasant, but the hybrid 
progeny is destitute of beauty, and not worth 
attention. 

Hens are frequently to be seen which have 
assumed the plumage and spurs of the cock, 
and which imitate, though badly, his full- 
toned crow. In these cases the power of pro- 
ducing eggs is invariably lost, from internal 
disease, as has been fully demonstrated by 
Mr. Yarrell.—See Proc. Zool. Soc. 1831, 
p. 22, and Phil. Trans. 1827. 

There are instances on record of poultry 


THE PEA-FOWL. 69 


becoming white from sudden fear. In the 
Proc. Zool. Soc., 1835, p. 54, is the following 
note, extracted by sir Robert Heron, Bart., 
from his journal. ‘1821-2. A black Poland 
cock belonging to my friend and neighbour, 
Mr. Kendall, of Barnsley, was seized last 
winter, near the house, by a fox, but his 
screams being heard by the servants, he was 
rescued, desperately wounded, with the loss of 
half his feathers. In time the remainder of 
his feathers came off, and he is now become 
perfectly white. This seems to have some 
relation to the human hair becoming white 
at once from fear.” 


THE PEA-FOWL. 


The pea-fowl (Pavo cristatus) is a native of 
India, Ceylon, etc., inhabiting the dense 
forests, where it perches on the highest trees 
often above the range of gun-shot ; and the 
sportsman frequently hears its shrill, harsh, 
and startling cry, while the bird remains in- 
visible, or launching itself into the air, floats 
in majestic buoyancy hopelessly high above 
his head. When on the ground, the pea-fowl 
keeps much amidst thick jungle, and if sud- 


70 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


denly surprised, is out of sight in a moment. 
Besides man, many are the enemies of this 
beautiful bird, among which, the tiger, the 
leopard, and others of the feline race, are to be 
enumerated. In Ceylon, the natives assert 
that it often falls a prey to the slender loris, 
(Joris gracilis) a small nocturnal animal of the 
Lemurine family, of arboreal habits. While 
the pea-fowl sleeps on its perch, its insidious 
foe creeps slowly and noiselessly towards it, 
and suddenly seizes it by the neck, which it 
clutches with such tenacity that the bird, 
fluttering in the agony of strangulation, drops 
from its perch to the ground, with its foe still 
clinging. Here it soon expires, and the loris 
devours its brains, leaving the rest of the body 
untouched. Colonel Sykes states that “the 
wild pea-fowl is abundant in the dense woods 
of the Ghauts: it is readily domesticated, 
and many Hindoo temples inthe Dukhun have 
considerable flocks of them. On a comparison 
with the bird domesticated in Europe, the 
latter is found both male and female to be 
absolutely identical with the wild bird of 
India.” In the passes of the Jungletery, 
colonel Williamson found these birds in great 
numbers, and the woods were strewed with 


THE PEA-FOWL. 71 


their beautiful plumes, and on one occasion 
he saw twelve or fifteen hundred together, 
feeding upon the bloom of mustard, cultivated 
in patches, and which attracted them. He 
states that when numbers are thus collected 
in the jungle it is not easy to get a shot at 
them, as they run extremely fast, and even a 
dog can scarcely make them take wing. 

It is evident that the pea-fowl was do- 

mesticated at a very early period, for as we 
have previously observed, it was brought over 
for Solomon, and, doubtless, constituted one 
of the ornaments of his pleasure gardens. 
It was introduced into ancient Greece at a 
date far anterior to the time of Aristotle, who 
speaks of it as being familiarly known, and 
it is mentioned by Aristophanes. 
. The Romans were well acquainted with this 
gorgeous bird, the bird of Juno, as the poets 
called it, feigning that with the eyes of Argos 
she adorned its tail and thus bestudded it 
with gems—‘‘et gemmis caudam stellantibus 
implet.”” 

The beauty of the peacock, however, did 
not insure its safety; numbers were killed to 
swell the luxurious entertainments of the 
wealthy, insomuch that one of the poets said, 


72 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Miraris quolies gemmantes explicat alas, 
Et potes hunc sevo tradere, dure ccquo.” 


You are filled with admiration as often as it unfolds its gemmed 
plumes ; 
And can you, hard-hearted, deliver this to the merciless cook ? 


The pea-fowl figured in the feasts of Hor- 
jtensius and other sensualists ; but how lavishly 
‘must it have been slaughtered for the emperor 
Vetellius, one of whose favourite dishes, called 
the buckler of Minerva, was prepared with 
the livers of scare,* the tongues of flamingoes, 
and the brains of peacocks. It is very 
probable that we owe the introduction of 
the pea-fowl into our island to the Romans. 
Its name in Saxon pawa, in Belgic pauw, 
in Teutonic pfaw, and in French paon, are 
evidently mere corruptions of the Latin pavo 
(pronounced most likely pawo) itself a cor- 
ruption of the Greek raov (tadn). Like the 


* A fish, scarus creticus. ‘‘ The Archipelago (between Greece 
and Asia Minor) says Cuvier, possesses a species (of scarus) 
of a blue or red colour according to the season. It is the 
scarus creticus of Aldrovandus, and after fresh researches 
appears to me to be the true scarus so celebrated among the 
ancients, and which under the reign of Claudius, Elipertius 
Optatus, commander of a Roman fleet, went to procure in 
Greece, in order to naturalize it in seas of Italy. It is eaten at 
the present time in Greece, its intestines being seasoned.” 


THE PEA-FOWL. 73 


Romans, our rude forefathers highly esteemed 
the peacock as a delicacy of the table; after 
being dressed, it was served up with the 
plumes attached and expanded, and thus 
swelled the pomp of the entertainment. Before 
the peacock and the ladies did the knight in 
the olden time utter his solemn vow. 

The flesh of the young pea-fowl is still held 
in estimation, but that of old birds is tough 
and dry. 

The habits of the pea-fowl in a state of 
domestication are well known; it is fond of 
wandering about, and is unfitted for the ordi- 
nary poultry yard; it delights to roam over 
extensive lawns, and about parks, and shrub- 
beries, walking along with stately steps, its 
long plumes sweeping gracefully and con- 
stituting a train of inimitable splendour. 
Often it stops, and raising up its train expands 
its radiant colours to the sun, and looks 
proudly around, as if conscious of superlative 
beauty. Who has not gazed with admiration 
on the spectacle thus presented? who, con- 
templating the bird thus adorned by the great 
Creator, as if to delight the eyes of man, has 
not been ready to exclaim, surely no monarch 

c3 


94 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


on his throne was ever so gorgeously arrayed, 
not even ‘‘ Solomon in all his glory.” 

Many persons regard the long plumes of 
the peacock as its tail, and in common lan- 
guage it is said “to spread its tail”’ This, 
however, is incorrect ; the true tail, which con- 
sists of short stiff feathers of a rusty colour, 
is underneath these plumes, and serves to sup- 
port them: it may be seen when the plumes 
are expanded. The plumes are really the 
tail coverts, and arise from the lower part of 
the back, where the skin is furnished with a 
strong muscular expansion in order to raise 
them at pleasure. The structure of these 
plumes and the ever-varying colours of the 
loose barbs that fringe them, have been often 
admired: the shaft is slender, tapering, and 
elastic, and is fringed on each side with long 
loose silky barbs, of metallic irridescence, glit- 
tering now green, now golden, as the lhght 
falls at different angles upon them. The 
shaft is terminated by an ocellated disc, a 
centre of purple, deep and intense, is en- 
circled by rich emerald green, around which 
runs a broad expanse of gleaming bronze, 
with a narrow margin of golden green, the 
whole being fringed with waving threads of 


THE PEA-FOWL. 75 


varying hues, purple, or green, or bronze. 
But who can copy these glittering tints, this 
ever-varying effulgence? Art shrinks from 
the attempt. The female or pea-hen is desti- 
tute of these exquisite plumes, and is far 
inferior in beauty to the male; like him, how- 
ever, she has an aigrette on the top of the 
head composed of twenty-four feathers: these 
resemble in miniature the feathers of the train, 
but are less brilliant. The male is furnished 
with spurs, and will sometimes use them with 
severity. We knew a gentleman who, when 
young, had his lip cut open by a blow from 
an angry peacock. 

Though these birds roost on the highest 
branches of tall trees, and are fond of perch- 
ing on elevated sites, still the female incu- 
bates on the ground; the chosen spot being 
concealed amidst bushes and jungles. The 
nest consists merely of a few sticks and 
twigs put together with dried leaves. The 
eges are from five or six to ten in number. 
The female sits assiduously, but the male, in- 
fluenced by a strange antipathy, will break 
the eggs if he can discover them. It is, there- 
fore, necessary in the case of the domesticated 
birds to prevent the possibility of any inter- 


76 OUK DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


ference on the part of the male with the 
female during incubation. 

Sir Robert Heron, Bart., in his notes, (Proc. 
Zool. Soc. 1835, p. 54,) says, “ For a good 
many years I have attended to the habits of 
pea-fowl, and for the last eleven years have 
written down my observations. I find the 
individuals to differ as much in temper as 
human beings: some are willing to take care 
of the young ones of others, whilst some have 
pursued and killed them, and this whether 
they had a brood of their own or not. Some 
cocks have assisted in the care of young ones, 
whilst others have attacked them. An early 
hen frequently has a brood herself the next 
year. Age makes no difference in the number 
of the brood. Ihave had six from a hena 
year old, and one from an old hen.” Sir 
Robert Heron also adverts to the decided par- 
tiality shown by the pea-fowl towards some 
particular individual, and their neglect of 
others, as well as the court paid by the hens 
to the males. 

The peacock is not completely matured and 
in full dress till the third year. The food of 
these birds consists of grain of various kinds ; 
the leayes and buds of vegetables; insects and 


THE PEA-FOWL. Vt 


their larvee, slugs, worms, and even lizards and 
small snakes. The voice of the peacock is a 
loud dissonant scream, and a frequent reitera- 
tion of this wild cry is said to indicate with 
certainty a change of weather; but we cannot 
say that we have observed the fact ourselves. 

As in the case of the fowl and the pheasant, 
instances are not unfrequent in which the 
female assumes the male plumage, and even 
acquires his spurs. The causes which operate 
in producing this change we have briefly 
noticed in the previous article. 

Long domestication has produced less variety 
in the colour of the plumage of the pea-fowl, 
than in the ordinary domestic fowl. We have 
seen some white peacocks, and others more or 
less pied with white; there is also a japanned 
breed, of which sir R. Heron speaks as follows: 
“The japanned breed are, I believe, a variety 
originating in England. In lord Brownlow’s 
numerous breed of common, white, and pied, 
the japanned suddenly in my memory appeared 
amongst them. ‘The same thing happened in 
sir J. Trevelyan’s flock of entirely the common 
sort; also in a breed of common and pied 
given by lady Chatham to Mr. Thoroton, and 
in both cases to the extinction of the previously 


78 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


existing breed.” Of this japanned breed, we 
have seen no specimens, nor are we sure as to 
the colour assumed. 

In all countries, the peacock is valued for its 
beauty. ‘ Peacocks,” says a writer, “are great 
favourites in Persia, and are more common 
than in this country as an ornament in grounds 
and gardens. The king of Persia has a throne 
which is called the throne of the peacock, on 
account of two artificial birds, intended to 
represent peacocks, which are placed on square 
pillars on each side of the seat. These birds 
are studded with precious stones, and each of 
them holds a large ruby in his beak.” In 
China, beautiful fire-screens, and other orna- 
mental articles are made of peacock’s feathers, 
tastefully arranged, and mounted on ivory 
handles. 

Besides the common peacock, which is too 
well known to need a detailed description, 
there is a second species seldom brought alive to 
England, called the Javanese, or Japan peacock. 
(Pavo Japonicus—Aldr. ; Pavo muticus— 
Linn. ; Pavo Javanicus—Horsf.) This species 
is a native of Japan, the Birman Empire, Java, 
and Sumatra. Living specimens have existed 
in the gardens of the Zoological Society, and 


THE PEA-FOWL. 79 


were brought from the Birman territory. This 
species equals the former in size, and is almost 
equally, if not quite as beautiful. The first 
information we have respecting this species, is 
that given by Aldrovandus, (1599,) who, how- 
ever, had never seen the bird, but only two 
drawings sent by the emperor of Japan to the 
pope. Subsequently nothing farther was heard 
about it, till Shaw described it in his Zoological 
Miscellany, from a figure taken from an Indian 
drawing sent to England by a friend. M. 
Temminck in the year 1813, in the second 
volume of his work on Gallinaceous Birds, gave 
a sketch of the head, with a description, taken 
by Le Vaillant from a living individual seen by 
him at the Cape of Good Hope, whither it had 
been sent from Macao. More recently the bird 
has been described by Dr. Horsefield, who 
found it in Java; while sir Stamford Raffles 
observed it in Sumatra. Specimens are in the 
British Museum. 

The prevailing tints in this species are blue 
and green, varying in intensity and mutually 
changing into each other, according as the 
light falls more or less directly upon them. 
The crest is twice as long as in the common 
species, and the feathers of which it is com- 


80 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


posed, are regularly barbed from the base 
upwards in the adult bird, and of equal breadth 
throughout. Head and crest interchangeably 
blue and green, a naked space on the cheeks, in- 
cluding the eyes and ears, is coloured of a light 
yellow behind, and of a bluish-green towards its 
fore part. The feathers of the neck and breast, 
which are broad, short, rounded, and imbricated 
like the scales of a fish, (very different to those 
in the other species,) are at the base of the 
same brilliant hue as the head, and have a 
broad, lighter, and somewhat metallic margin. 
Those of the back have still more of the metallic 
lustre. The wing-coverts are of the general 
hue, with a deeper tinge of blue; the primary 
quill feathers are light chestnut. The tail 
feathers and their coverts, namely the train, 
are of a splendid metallic brown, changing 
into green. The latter are terminated by 
ocellated spots similar to those of the common 
peacock. Iris deep hazel; in the common 
species it is of an intense red. The female has a 
plain dress, closely resembling that of the com- 
mon pea-hen; but the crest is different. (See 
Gardens and Menagerie of Zoological Society.) 

Whether this species is gregarious like the 
common pea-fowl, or more solitary in its habits, 


THE TURKEY. . 8&1 


we have yet to learn, nothing, indeed, is 
known respecting its manners in a state of 
nature, nor does it seem to be very abundant. 
Preserved specimens are in the British 
Museum, and in the museum of the Zoological 
Society. 


—— 


THE TURKEY. 


The turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) is origin- 
ally a native of America. The term meleagris, 
applied by modern zoologists to this bird, was 
given by the ancients to quite a different 
species, namely the guinea-fowl. According 
to Grecian fable, the sisters of Meleager mourn- 
ing the death of their brother, were transformed 
into these birds, the plumage of which is 
covered with white spots, the showers of their 
tears. The application of the title meleagris 
to the turkey, arose from the obscurity in 
which it was enveloped when it first made its 
appearance in Europe, and the very names of 
Turkey, Coq d’Inde, Gallo d’ India, and Indian- 
ische Hahn, prove the ignorance which pre- 
vailed respecting it. The history of the turkey, 
indeed, as it respects its introduction into 
Europe, is almost a blank. When, or by whom 


82 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


“it was brought, we do not know: most proba- 
bly Spain first received it in the beginning of 
the sixteenth century from her new world 
colonies, and most likely it had been leng 
antecedently domesticated in Mexico. Certain 
it is that Oviedo, in his Natural History of the 
Indies, (for so were the intertropical parts of 
America then called,) published at Toledo in 
the year 1526, describes the turkey as a kind 
of peacock, abounding in New Spain, whence 
numbers had been transported to the islands 
and the Spanish Main, and domesticated in 
the houses of the Christian inhabitants. Yet 
even in 1524, during the reign of Henry vitr., 
was the turkey known in England. There is 
an old distich which runs as follows :— 


“Turkies, Carps, Hops, Pickerell, and Beer, 
Came into England all in one year.” 


It was about the year 1524 that hops, or 
the Humulus lupulus, were introduced into 
England from Flanders, and at the same time 
came in the turkey. In other respects the 
couplet is erroneous. Mr. Yarrell, who, in 
his history of the carp, notices these lines, 
says, “ Pike, or Pickerell, were the subjects of 
legal regulations in the reign of Edward 1, 
Carp are mentioned in the Book of St. Albans, 


THE TURKEY. 838 


printed in 1496. Turkeys and hops were 
unknown till 1524, previous to which worm- 
wood and other bitter plants were used to pre- 
serve beer; and the parliament in 1528, peti- 
tioned against hops as a wicked weed. Beer 
was licensed for exportation by Henry vu. in 
1492, and an excise on beer existed as early 
as 1284, and also in the reign of Edward 1.” 
Difficult as it is to rear broods of turkeys in 

our country, they appear to have greatly mul- 
tiplied soon after their introduction, for in 
1541, we find them enumerated among the 
delicacies of the table. Archbishop Cranmer 
(Leland’s ‘Collectanea’) ordered that of cranes, 
swans, and turkey-cocks, there should be at 
festivals only one dish ; and in 1573, Tusser, in 
his Five Hundred Points of Good Husbandry, 
enumerates these birds as gracing the farmer’s 
table at Christmas. In the present day the 
turkey, in a state of domestication, is very 
widely spread. In India it is reared, according 
to colonel Sykes, in great numbers by the 
Portuguese. It has not, we believe, extended 
to Persia. There is a humorous story told in 
the Sketches of Persia, that these birds are at 
least not generally known there. It appears 
that two English gentlemen, on their arrival” 


84 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLs. 


at the town of Kazeroon, on their way to 
Shiraz, heard a strange account of two re- 
markable creatures that were to be seen at a 
village fifteen miles distant. In answer to the 
questions which their curiosity prompted them 
to put, one old man said—They are very like 
birds, for they have feathers and two legs, and 
one of them has a long black beard on the 
breast. But the chief point on which they 
dwelt was the strangeness of their voice, so 
unlike that of any other bird they had ever 
heard. An old man who had gone all the 
way from Kazeroon to see them, said that the 
sound was very much like that of the Arabic 
language, but, nevertheless, he added, though 
he had listened to them with the greatest 
attention, he had not been able to understand 
a word they said. At great inconvenience, 
and with no little fatigue from the badness of 
the roads, the two Englishmen, excited by 
curiosity, gained the village: they were taken 
to the place where these strange creatures 
were kept, the door was unlocked, and, lo! 
out marched a turkey-cock and his mate. 
The former rejoicing in his freedom began to 
strut about, and gobble his Arabic, with 
great vociferation. When informed. by the 


THE TURKEY. 85 


gentlemen, whose laughter was irrepressible, 
that these birds were common in India and 
England, the people were greatly surprised. 
The birds, it appeared, had escaped from a 
vessel which had been wrecked in the gulf 
of Persia, and had gradually made their way 
, up the country. 

We will not attempt to describe the turkey, 
for no one is unacquainted with its charac- 
teristics. It is certainly one of the ornaments 
of the farm-yard; the adult male in particular 
is a noble bird, and shows to great advantage, 
when with haughty port and expanded tail he 
struts about, uttering his guttural “ Arabic.” 
The carunculated skin of the head and neck 
changes from pale flesh colour to purple, and 
from purple to crimson, and ever and anon 
a smart jar with the wings as he draws them 
on the ground produces a whirring sound dis- 
tinctly audible. 

The male turkey is distinguished by short 
blunt spurs, and a tuft of long coarse black 
hair pendant from the lower part of the neck. 
The carunculated skin of the head and neck is 
more developed in the male than in the female, 
whom he much exceeds in size. The general 
plumage has a metallic lustre. In temper the 


86 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


male turkey is extremely irascible; his fury, 
like that of the bull, is excited by red or scarlet 
colours, which rouse him to make an attack, 
from which children are occasionally liable to 
injury. We have more thaw once seen des- 
perate battles between the turkey-cock and 
game-cock, in which the latter was more 
oppressed by the weight of his adversary than 
by his gladiatorial skill, and received but little 
injury. 

Turkeys are birds of rambling habits, and 
only fitted for the farm-yard and extensive 
premises; they delight to wander in the 
fields, in quest of insects, on which with 
green herbage, berries, mast, and various seeds, 
they greedily feed. In this manner the troop 
will ramble about all day, returning to roost 
in the evening, when they should have a good 
supply of grain, and again in the morning. 
When adult, the turkey is extremely hardy, 
and will roost with impunity all night on the 
branches of tall trees during the severity of 
winter, especially if the weather be dry. 
Still it is better for them to roost under cover, 
on high perches in well-ventilated lofty sheds, 
appropriated exclusively to them. Their size 
renders them aunoying and troublesome in 


THE TURKEY. 87 


the ordinary fowl-house, and besides, the com- 
mon poultry have a strong dislike to associate 
with them. 

The domestic turkey varies considerably 
in colouring: we have seen some of pure white, 
some of a delicate fawn colour, others of a 
coppery tint, and others of a bronzed black. 
The dark-coloured birds are considered the 
most hardy, and are usually of a larger size 
than the paler varieties, and are, therefore, 
generally the most prized. The female lays 
early in the spring: the number of eggs is 
indeterminable, but she will cover no more 
than twelve or fifteen: they are of a whitish 
colour spotted with brown. The period of 
incubation lasts for thirty days. During the 
time the hen is sitting, she requires constant 
attention: she should not only be secluded 
from the male, but taken occasionally off the 
nest to feed, and regularly supplied with fresh 
water, otherwise she wiil continue to sit 
without leaving for food, or refreshment, till 
completely exhausted. At the time of hatch- 
ing, far more care and attention is required 
than in the case of the common hen, but in 
the degree of protection which she shows 
towards her brood, the turkey hen is far 


85 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


inferior. She has neither the alertness, courage, 
nor tender solicitude of the fowl; she is but 
little apt in their defence, and has no idea of 
calling them around her and teaching them to 
pick and search for food: They require, 
therefore, unremitting attention, until they are 
fairly reared, and this is a work of no little 
trouble, for although the adult turkey is so 
hardy, a shower of rain will kill the chicks, and 
irregularity of feeding will thin their numbers 
rapidly. Linnzeus remarks that the young 
relish garlic and nettles, and must be defended 
from rain and hunger. Curd, the green part 
of onions chopped, and boiled nettles, boiled 
eggs, barley meal or oatmeal kneaded with 
milk or water, chopped beet or turnip leaves, 
etc., constitute the diet on which the chicks 
best thrive. They should not be exposed to 
great heat or cold, and it is better to have the 
brood hatched rather late in the spring, when 
the weather becomes settled, than at an early 
period. — 

Turkeys are crammed in order to attain the 
requisite degree of plumpness for the London 
poulterer ; and it is principally from Norfolk 
that the London markets are supplied. This 
process of fattening, in the case of turkey 


THE TURKEY. 89 


poults, may commence when they are about six 
months old, and they require a longer time to 
become fit for the market than the fowl. The 
large birds which grace the shops at Christmas 
are usually males of the preceding year. These 
birds are oftenof extraordinary size and weight, 
. ranging from fifteen to thirty pounds. 

So far we have attended to the domestic 
turkey ; but as the manners and habits of the 
wild bird are remarkable and very interesting, 
our history would be far from satisfactory 
were we to abstain from detailing them. Our 
authorities, it must be premised, are the Prince 
of Canino, (C. L. Bonaparte,) and M. Audubon, 
who have paid great attention to these birds 
in their native forests. 

“The native country of the wild turkey,” 
says C. L. Bonaparte, “‘ extends from the north- 
western territory of the United States to the 
Isthmus of Panama, south of which it is not 
to be found ; notwithstanding the statements 
of authors who have mistaken the curassow 
for it. In Canada, and the densely peopled 
parts of the United States, wild turkeys were 
very abundant ; but like the Indian and buffalo, 
they have been compelled to yield to the de- 
structive ingenuity of the white settlers, often 


90 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


wantonly exercised, and seek refuge in the 
remotest parts of theinterior. Although they 
relinquish their native soil with slow and relue- 
tant steps, yet such is the rapidity with which 
settlements are extended and condensed over 
the surface of this country, that we may 
anticipate a day at no distant date, when the 
hunter will seek the wild turkey in vain.” 
From Audubon we learn that the unsettled 
states of the Ohio, Kentucky, Illinois, and 
Indiana, an immense extent of country to the 
north-west of these distrécts, upon the Missis« 
sippi and Missouri, and the vast regions 
drained by these rivers, from their confluence 
to Louisiana, including the wooded parts of 
Arkansas, Tennessee, and Alabama, are the 
most plentifully supplied with this magnificent 
bird. It is less plentiful in Georgia and che 
Carolinas,—becomes still scarcer in Virginia 
and Pennsylvania, and is now very rarely seen 
to the eastward of the last-mentioned states. 
“The wild. turkeys do not confine them- 
selves to any particular food; they eat maize, 
all sorts of berries, fruits, grasses, beetles, and 
even tadpoles; young frogs and lizards are 
occasionaliy found in their crops; but where 
the pecan nut is plentiful, they prefer that 


THE TURKEY. 91 


fruit to any other nourishment; their more 
general predilection, however, is for the acorn, 
on which they rapidly fatten. When an un- 
usually profuse crop of acorns is produced in 
a particular section of country, great numbers 
of turkeys are enticed from their ordinary 
haunts in the surrounding districts. About 
the beginning of October, while the mast still 
remains on the trees, they assemble in flocks, 
‘and direct their course to the rich bottom- 
lands. At this season they are observed in 
great numbers on the Ohio and Mississippi. 
The time of this irruption is known to the 
Indians by the name of the turkey-month. 
**The males, usually termed gobblers, asso- 
ciate in parties numbering from ten to a hun- 
dred, and seek their food apart from the 
females, whilst the latter either move about 
singly with their young, then nearly two- 
thirds grown, or in company with other 
females, and their families, ferm troops some- 
times consisting of seventy or eighty indi- 
viduals, all of whom are intent on avoiding 
the old males, who, whenever opportunity 
offers, attack and destroy the young by repeated 
blows on the skull. All parties, however, 
travel in the same direction, and on foot, 


92 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


unless they are compelled to seek their indi- 
vidual safety by flying from the hunter’s dog, 
or their march is impeded by a large river. 

** When about to cross a river they select 
the highest eminences that their flight may be 
the more certain, and here they sometimes 
remain for a day or more, as if for the pur- 
pose of consultation, or to be duly prepared 
for so hazardous a voyage. During this time 
the males gobble obstreperously and_ strut 
with extraordinary importance, as if they 
would animate their companions, and inspire, 
them with the utmost degree of hardihood ; 
the females and young also assume much of 
the pompous air of the males, the former 
spreading their tails and moving silently* 
around. At length the assembled multitude 
mount to the tops of the highest trees, whence 
at a single note, from a leader, the whole 
together wing their way towards the opposite 
shore. All the old and fat ones cross without 
difficulty, but the young, meagre, and weak, 
often fall short of the desired landing, and 
are forced to swim for their lives. This they 
do dexterously enough, spreading out their 


* Audubon says the females purr loudly and perform extra- 
vagant leaps. 


is) 


THE TURKEY. 93 


tails for a support, closing the wings to the 
body, stretching the neck forwards, and strik- 
ing out quickly and forcibly with their legs. 
If in thus endeavouring to gain the land, they 
approach an elevated or inaccessible bank, 
their exertions are remitted, they resign them- 
selves to the stream for a short time, in 
order to gain strength, and then with one 
violent effort escape from the water. But in 
this attempt all are not successful: some of 
the weaker, as they cannot rise sufliciently 
high in the air to clear the bank, fall again 
and again into the water, and thus miserably 
perish. Immediately the turkeys have suc- 
ceeded in crossing a river, they for some time 
ramble about without any unanimity of pur- 
pose, and a great many are destroyed by the 
hunters, although they are then least valuable. 

‘When the turkeys have arrived in their 
land of abundance, they disperse in small 
flocks, composed of individuals of all sexes 
and ages intermingled, who devour all the 
mast as they advance. This occurs about 
the middle of November. It has been ob- 
served that, after these long journeys the 
turkeys become so familiar ‘as to venture 
on the plantations, and even approach so near 


94 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


farm-houses as to enter the stable and corn- 
cribs in search of food. In this way they pass 
the autumn and part of the winter. During 
this season great numbers are killed by the 
inhabitants, who preserve them in a frozen 
state, in order to transport them to a distant 
market.” From the middle of February to 
March, the male turkeys seek to join the 
females, which a short time previously separate © 
from and avoid them. At this season the 
males strut about, uttering their loud gobbling 
notes, and often engage in desperate combats, 
terminating in the death or flight of one of 
the parties. At night the males and females 
roost apart from each other, in the wood, but 
at no great distance, so that they are within 
the sound of each other’s voices; and when 
the female utters a call note, it is responded 
to by numerous males, rolling out note after 
note, with great velocity, much in the manner 
of the domestic turkey-cock when suddenly 
alarmed. 

Three or four hens, or even more, are usually 
attached to a single male ; they wander about 
in company together, and roost in the same 
or adjacent trees. This association continues 
till the females begin to lay, which is usually 


THE TURKEY. 95 


about the middle of April, when they forsake 
_ the male, and look out for suitable places in 
which to deposit their eggs. Several hens 
sometimes associate together and make a 
common nest, incubating together as if for 
mutual safety, and rearing and watching over 
their united broods in common. | The chosen 
spot is always dry and well concealed; for the 
lynx, the fox, the polecat, and the crow are 
enemies to be guarded against ; the nest con- 
sists of dried leaves deposited in a shallow 
depression under the cover of dense brush- 
wood, amidst piled up logs or masses of fallen 
timber, or in other obscure and retired situa- 
tions. The eggs, from nine to fifteen in num- 
her, are of a whitish colour, spotted with red- 
dish brown. 

On leaving her nest the female cautiously 
covers the eggs with dried leaves, lest they 
should catch the prying eye of some marauder, 
and both on leaving them, and in returning, 
she varies her route, rarely pursuing the same 
track twice together. On the approach of man, 
or any animal, the female crouches closer on 
her eggs, watching every movement with the 
greatest attention, and if no notice be taken 
of her will permit a very close approximation; 


96 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


if, however, she perceive that she is discovered, 
she runs off for several yards, then pauses, 
struts about, and utters from time to time a 
cluck of anxiety or impatience. On the de- 
parture of the intruder, she cautiously returns. 
It is not often on account of interruption from 
man that she abandons the eggs; but if any 
have been sucked by the crow, polecat, or 
snake, she infallibly leaves them; this, how- 
ever, seldom happens where several females 
incubate in concert, as one or more always 
guards the common nest, while the others are 
temporarily absent. 

When the eggs are at the point of hatching, 
the female is doubly assiduous, and will die 
rather than leave them. She will even suffer 
an inclosure to be drawn around her, and 
while thus imprisoned will attend to her 
duties. Audubon says, “J once witnessed 
the hatching of a brood of turkeys, which I 
watched for the purpose of securing them to- 
gether with the parent. I concealed myself 
on the ground within a very few feet, and saw 
her raise herself half the length of her legs, 
look anxiously upon the eggs, cluck with a 
sound peculiar to the mother on such occa- 
sions, carefully remove each half empty shell, 


THE TURKEY. 97 


and with her bill caress and dry the young 
birds, that already stood tottering and at- 
tempting to make their way out of the nest. 
Yes, I have seen this, and have left the mother 
and young to-better care than mine could have 
proved, to the care of their Creator and mine. 
I have seen them all emerge from the shell, 
and in a few moments after, tumble, roll, and 
push each other forward, with astonishing and 
inscrutable instinct.’ 

When the young are dry and sufficiently 
strong, the female rises from her nest, shakes 
and arranges her plumage, and prepares to 
lead them abroad. She walks slowly along, 
with half expanded wings, and by repeated 
clucks keeps them together and around her. 
Her eyes are incessantly on the watch, she 
glances anxiously in every direction, scrutinizes 
the trees, the sky, the ground, and the thickets, 
lest her brood be suddenly assailed by the 
hawk or the fox. She avoids also low and 
wet grounds, resorting to elevated spots, for 
instinct has told her that the brood when once 
their soft down is wetted seldom survive. 
Hence it happens that in rainy seasons young 
turkeys are very scarce. 

For the first few days, the female does not 

7 


98 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


lead her brood to a distance, and usually 
returns with them to the nest as the evening 
comes on, where they rest during the night, 
huddled up warm beneath her wings. As 
they gain strength, they make wider ex- 
cursions, visit the glades and more open parts 
near the wood, and there pick up various 
fruits, berries, and insects, as grasshoppers, ete. 
and the larvee of ants. They luxuriate in the 
sun, and roll themselves in sandy places, or 
in deserted ants’ nests, and thus clean their 
growing plumage. In about a fortnight, the 
young begin to roost at night on the lower 
branches of a tree, but still under the care of 
the female parent who covers them with her 
“wings, as they sit in two parties crouching on 
each side. 

After this period the growth of the young 
turkeys is very rapid, and towards the middle 
of August, when several broods under the 
care of their respective mothers associate 
together, they are quite able to provide for 
their own safety and escape from enemies. 
Their wings are vigorous, and their limbs 
robust and active; they easily mount into the 
branches of the trees or run to shelter in 
some covers. Soon after this period the great 


THE TURKEY. 99 


re-union of the females with their broods and 
of the adult males takes place, preparatory to 
the October migration from one district to 
another. 

Besides man, who employs traps of various 
kinds, and the gun, in the capture of this bird, 
the turkey has numerous enemies, of which 
the lynx, the snowy owl, and the Virginian 
owl, are the most formidable. The lynx 
follows the flock, singles out stragglers, and 
lies in ambush till an opportunity of springing 
upon his victim occurs. The owls attack 
them while roosting at night, and hovering 
over the trees on silent wing, make a rapid 
and often fatal pounce on the unconscious 
sleeper. In this, however, the owl is not 
always successful, for if discovered by one 
wakeful turkey, a single cluck announces to 
the whole flock, the presence of their foe. In 
an instant, every bird stands upright on its 
perch, and intently watches the motions of 
the winged marauder, and prepares for the 
swoop. Having selected his prey, down comes 
the owl, with arrow-like rapidity and vast 
force, against which positive resistance would 
be vain, but just at the proper instant the 
wary turkey lowers its head, and stooping, 

D2 


100 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


spreads its stiff tail in an inverted manner 
over its back, and along this, as a smooth in- 
clined plane, the owl glances, without injury 
to the turkey, which immediately drops to the 
ground, with the loss of a few feathers, and 
conceals itself. 

The wild turkey is very shy, and generally 
makes off on the appearance of a man, yet 
when at roost, though a single owl would 
alarm a whole troop, the hunter may thin 
their numbers with his gun during moonlight, 
neither the report, nor the sight of their com- 
panion dropping from the branches, exciting 
more than a buzzing noise, expressive rather 
of astonishment than of positive fright. 
*“When, (says Audubon,) after a heavy fall of 
snow, the weather becomes frosty so as to form 
a hard crust on the surface, the turkeys remain 
on their roosts for three or four days, some- 
times much longer, which proves their capa- 
bility of continued abstinence. When near 
farms, however, they leave the roosts and go 
into the very stables, and about the stacks of 
corn, to procure food. During melting snow- 
falls, they will travel to an extraordinary dis- 
tance, and are then followed in vain, it being 
impossible for hunters of any description to 


THE TURKEY. 101 


keep up with them. They have then a dang- 
ling and straggling way of running, which, 
awkward as it may seem, enables them to out- 
strip any other animal. I have often, when 
on a good horse, been obliged to abandon the 
attempt to put them up, after following them 
for several hours. This habit of running in 
rainy or very damp weather of any kind is not 
peculiar to the wild turkey, but is common to 
all gallinaceous birds. In America, the dif- 
ferent species of grouse exhibit the same 
tendency.” 

During the breeding season, the males may 
be allured within gun-shot by imitating the 
call note of the female. It is done by forcibly 
drawing the air through one of the wing 
bones of a turkey, but it requires great 
practice, for the quick ear of the male im- 
mediately detects the slightest error of into- 
nation, and immediately retreats. 

The size of the wild turkey and the quality 
of the flesh vary according to abundance or 
scarcity of food. In districts where food is 
plentiful, the wild turkey is said to be superior 
to the tame bird for the table, and is in the 
highest season late in the autumn. In Mexico, 
however, the wild turkey, according to Her- 


102 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


nandez, is inferior to the domestic breed, its 
flesh being dry and hard; this, perhaps, is 
owing to the quality of the food. 

The wild turkey is far superior in stature and 
beauty to the tame bird; the latter, even in 
America, its native country, is deteriorated by 
domestication ; hence mixed breeds between the 
wild and tame are much valued, and procured 
when possible. ‘‘ Eggs of the wild turkey have 
been frequently taken from their nests and 
hatched under the tame hen; the young pre- 
serve a portion of their uncivilized nature, and 
exhibit some knowledge of the difference be- 
tween themselves and their foster mother, 
roosting apart from the tame ones, and in 
other respects showing the force of hereditary 
disposition. ‘The domesticated young reared 
from the eggs of the wild turkey are often 
employed as decoy birds to those in a state of 
nature. Mr. William Bloom, of Clurfield, 
Pennsylvania, caught five or six wild turkeys 
when quite chickens, and succeeded in rearing 
them. Although sufficiently tame to feed 
with his tame turkeys, and generally associate 
with them, yet they always retained some of 
their original propensities, roosting by them- 


THE TURKEY. 103 


selves, and higher than the tame birds, gene- 
rally on the top of some tree or of the house. 
They were also more readily alarmed: on the 
approach of a dog, they would fly off and seek 
safety in the nearest woods. On an occasion 
of this kind, one of them flew across the Sus- 
quehanna, and the owner was apprehensive 
of losing it; in order to recover it, he sent a 
boy with a tame turkey, which was released 
at the place where the fugitive had alighted. 
This plan was. successful, they soon joined 
company, and the tame bird induced his com- 
panion to return home. Mr. Bloom remarked 
that the wild turkey will thrive more and keep 
in better condition than the tame on the same 
quantity of food.’ C. L. Bonaparte. 

The author last quoted states that some 
domesticated turkeys of a very superior me- 
tallic tint are sold in the Philadelphia and 
New York markets as wild ones: many of 
these require a practised eye to distinguish 
their true character, but they are always rather 
less brilliant, and have a broad whitish band 
at the top of the ¢ail-coverts, and another at 
the top of the tail itself, which immediately 
betrays them: the real wild birds are destitute 


104 OUR LOMESTIC FOWLS. 


of the whitish band on the tail-coverts, and 
the band at the top of the tail is neither so 
wide nor so purely white. 

The female wild turkey is far inferior in size 
to the male; she is adult and in full colouring 
at four years’ old, and then possesses the pec- 
toral tuft of hair, of about four inches in length. 
Her weight is from nine to ten pounds, but 
the male varies from fifteen to twenty pounds 
in weight. Birds of thirty pounds are not 
rare ; and instances have occurred, of their 
weight being thirty-six, and even forty pounds. 
In April and May, the males are thin, and out 
of condition; yet C. L. Bonaparte notices a 
specimen killed on the Missouri in April, which 
weighed twenty-two pounds, but which, when 
in good condition, must have exceeded thirty. 
The male wild turkey may be regarded as ma- 
ture at the age of between three and four years, 
but, for several years afterwards, increases in 
weight and the metallic lustre of the 
plumage. 

It is much to be regretted that the wholesale 
destruction to which this noble bird is sub- 
jected throughout the whole extent of its 
range, tends every year to diminish its num- 
bers, insomuch that in a comparatively short 


THE TURKEY. 105 


period of time, the wild turkey will rank in 
the list of animals which man has utterly ex- 
tirpated. 

Besides the wild turkey of North America, a 
distinct species, the Honduras turkey (Melea- 
gris ocellata) is found in certain parts of central 
America, adjacent to Mexico. The first speci- 
men, known formerly in Bullock’s collection, 
now in the museum of Paris, was brought from 
the Bay of Honduras. A fine specimen is in 
the British Museum. This bird is considerably 
smaller than the common wild turkey, but is 
far more beautiful, the metallic hues and irri- 
descence of its plumage equalling those of 
some of the humming birds,—black, golden, 
bronze, blue, emerald green, and rufous, are 
intermingled in exquisite contrast ; and on the 
tail-feathers and upper tail-coverts, there are 
beautiful ocellated markings. The legs are 
lake-red. 

Of the habits of this refulgent species, no- 
thing is distinctly known. It appears to be 
very rare, unless, perhaps, in some localities, 
which are as yet unexplored. 


Dio 


106 OUR DOMES'TIC FOWLS. 


THE GUINEA-FOWL, 


The guinea-fowl, or pintado, (Numida melea- 
gris,) is the true meleagris of the ancients,* a 
term generically applied by Belon, Aldrovandus, 
and Gesner, to the turkey, and now retained, 
although the error is acknowledged, in order 
to prevent confusion. 

The common guinea-fowl is a native of Africa, 
where it appears to be extensively spread, 
frequenting the banks of rivers, and marshes, 
and open-humed localities, where various ber- 
ries, seeds, insects, and slugs are in abundance. 
In its habits it is decidedly gregarious, and 
associates in large flocks, which wander abroad 
during the day in search of food, and collect 
together on the approach of evening, in order 
to roost upon some tall tree, or clump of trees, 
where they crowd in close array on the 
branches. It is not without difficulty that 
these birds can be forced to take to flight, and 
then it is only for a short distance. They 
trust principally to their rapid mode of run- 
ning, and to their dexterity in threading the 
mazes of brushwood and dense herbage, for 
security. They scour the woodland glades 

* See Ovid Metam. lib, viii. fab. 4, 


THE GUINEA-FOWL. 107 


and the open lands, bordering forests, or 
wild thickets, with great celerity, and quickly 
escape pursuit. In disposition they are shy, 
wary, and alert. 

The guinea-fowl has. been alluded to by vari- 
ous travellers in Africa, as Adamson, Dampier, 
Le Vaillant, and others; but as upwards of 
six distinct species are now known, (some of 
very great beauty,) and as they give no specific 
indications, we cannot positively say to which 
species they allude. However, it cannot be 
doubted that, in general manners and disposi- 
tion, they all closely agree. 

We have incontestable proof that the ancient 
Greeks and Romans were well acquainted with 
the guinea-fowl (or meleagris). It is noticed 
by Aristotle, among the former, and by Pliny, 
Varro, and Columella, among the latter. The 
wonder is that Belon, a scholar, should ever have 
considered the turkey as the bird in question. 

But though, as we have said, this bird was 
known to the ancient Greeks and Romans, it 
does not appear to have spread rapidly, or been 
thoroughly naturalized, otherwise Belon’s mis- 
take would be unpardonable. In fact, we lose 
all trace of it in the middle ages, and strange 
to say, it appears to have come to us, not from 


108 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Africa, (and here we suspect the confusion 
arises,) but from the western world, where it 
had been introduced with human bondsmen 
torn from their native soil to supply the place 
of the miserably slaughtered population of the 
western world, and condemned to labour for the 
conquering white man, for him whose only pas- 
sion, under the veil of popish religion, was “‘the 
accursed thirst for gold,” “ auri sacra fames.” 

We learn that about the year 1508, numbers 
of these birds were brought into America with 
the cargoes of negro slaves :—‘‘ The Spaniards 
neither at that time nor ever since, have 
attempted to tame them, or render them 
domestic, useful birds, but let them go loose 
and wild in the savannahs, where they have 
increased in such prodigious numbers, that 
they may well appear native; and are seen in 
vast flocks together. They are called Maroon 
Pentates by the Spaniards and French,” 
(Observ. sur les Cout. de lAsie, p. 190.) At 
the present day, in Jamaica, but more espe- 
cially Hayti, and other islands adjacent, the 
guinea-fowl, or pintado, is regarded as a wild | 
bird and shot like other game. — With respect 
to the British islands we are unable to say at 
what period it was introduced. We do not 


THE GUINEA-FOWL. 109. 


find its name occurring in the list of birds in 
the famous feast of archbishop Neville in the 
reign of Edward rv.; it does not appear on 
the duke of Northumberland’s household-book, 
1512, nor is it alluded to in the household- 
book of Henry virt., yet in these lists of flesh 
and fowl for the table, the peion, or peacock, 
is distinctly and conspicuously noted. It 
would appear, then, not to have been intro- 
duced until after the turkey ;—(we must par- 
don Belon,)—probably not until the end of the 
seventeenth, or beginning of the eighteenth 
century. Even at present, in our country, it is 
far less generally kept than the turkey. In the 
colder latitudes of Europe, it is yet scarcely 
known. Linneevs does not mention it in his 
«Fauna Suecica,”’ and we believe that neither 
Denmark, Norway, nor Northern Russia pos- 
sesses it; at all events it is scarce. In India, 
the guinea-fowl is to be seen only in a domestic 
state, and is bred almost exclusively by 
European gentlemen. It thrives as well as in 
its native country. (See Proc. Zool. Soc., 
1832, p. 152.) 

Such is the meagre outline of facts which 
we have been able to collect respecting the 
European naturalization of the guinea-fowl. 


110 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


The guinea-fowl retains in a state of domes- 
tication no small share of its original wildness, 
and restless wandering habits, and hence when 
closely confined it becomes dull and pining, 
and little disposed to breed; it loves a wide 
range of thickets, fields, and pasture grounds, 
and the run of open farm-yards, where it 
searches for insects, seeds, and green herbage, 
the flock traversing the hedge-rows and brakes, 
in the same manner as do turkeys. Like the 
turkey, too, the hen guinea-fowl conceals her 
nest from the male; for though at other times 
he is affectionate and solicitous, yet he evinces 
a great dislike to incubation, and on discover- 
ing the eggs never fails to destroy them. The 
hen, consequently, makes choice of the most 
secluded spot, so much so, that it is not with- 
out difficulty her retreat is discovered; and 
instances have come under our own notice in 
which a hen guinea-fowl has appeared in the 
farm-yard with a young brood attending upon 
her, after she had been given up as lost, or 
accidentally killed. In these instances, the 
eggs and young are subject to the attacks of 
foxes, polecats, weasels, and birds of prey; and 
as the guinea-fowl seldom shows much disposi- 
tion to incubate if kept under restraint, it is a 


THE GUINEA-FOWL. i111 


common practice to place the eggs under a 
common fowl, the risk of the loss of the brood 
being thus avoided. The natural period of 
incubation is from twenty-eight to twenty-nine 
days. The female guinea-fowl commences lay- 
ing in May, and continues to lay during the 
summer, and it is not until the latter part of 
the summer that, if left to her instinct, she 
begins to sit upon her eggs; these are smaller 
than those of the ordinary barn-door fowl, and 
are remarkable for the hardness of the shell, 
which is of a pale yellowish red, finely dotted 
with a darker tint. Their flavour is reckoned 
very superior. 

The guinea-fowl may be said to succeed the 
pheasant in the London market, coming in after 
the season of the latter is over, and it must be 
acknowledged that the flesh of the young bird 
is very delicate, juicy, and well-flavoured—this 
remark, however, only applies to the young, for 
old birds, even those of the second year, are 
dry, tough, and tasteless, nor will the larding 
of the poulterer improve them. . 

The guinea-fowl is too well known to need a 
detailed description, nor is it subject to much 
variation of plumage. Individuals with the 
breast or under parts more or less extensively 


ala, OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


white are common; and we have occasionally 
seen cream-coloured birds, in which, however, 
the white spots are clearly to be distinguished. 
Trees, where accessible, or tall thick bushes, 
are its favourite roosting-places, and on these 
the flock cluster, even during the winter, the 
cold of which they endure with great hardiness. 
We have noticed this indifference to cold in the 
pea-fowl, originally from India, and the same 
observation applies to the guinea-fowl of Africa, 
and we may also add the common fowl, of 
Indian origin ; nor can we avoid seeing in these 
facts a wise provision, for the express purpose 
of facilitating the diffusion of species eminently 
useful to man. 

The domestic guinea-fowl is by no means 
strong on the wing. Its note is a peculiar 
harsh querulous sound, often repeated, and 
certainly not agreeable; it reminds us of the 
noise of a cart-wheel turning on an ungreased 
axle-tree, or the creaking of rusty hinges, 
Besides the common guinea-fowl, (Numida 
meleagris,) several other wild species are 
known, some of which are remarkable for 
their beauty. All are African. In the genus 
numida, the males are destitute of spurs, 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON Group. 118 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. 


Very numerous are the species comprehended 
under the term pigeon, (Columba,) and many 
are the genera into which they are resolvable. 
Their geographic distribution is most extensive. 
Some species seem very widely spread, as the 
rock-dove, found alike in Europe, Asia, and 
Africa, while others are restricted in the range 
of their natural territory. Europe, Asia, 
Africa, America, Australia, the Indian Archi- 
pelago, New Zealand, and various islands in 
the southern ocean, present us with various and 
beautiful species of the columbine group; of 
these, some are exclusively arboreal and fruit- 
eaters; as the aromatic pigeon of Java, the 
manosope of New Guinea, and the nutmeg 
pigeon of the Moluccas ; others are partially 
terrestrial in their habits, as the ring-pigeon 
or cushat, and the stock-dove or wood-pigeon of 
Europe; and others are exclusively terrestrial, 
as the carunculated pigeon (Geophilus caruncu- 
latus) of South Africa, and some American and 
Australian species. A few, as the rock-pigeon, 
(Columba livia,) frequent abrupt and inacces- 
sible precipices, along the shores of the sea, 


114 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


and rear their young on the ledges, or in the 
rifts and fissures of the rock. 

There has been much difference among 
naturalists respecting the natural affinities of 
the pigeon, or columbine group; some con- 
sidering them as forming a part of the rasorial, 
or gallinaceous order, others regarding them 
as constituting a distinct order, an opinion 
entertained by Temminck, De Blainyille, and 
the prince of Musignano, and which we think 
is correct. Though zoological niceties in a 
popular work like the present are out of place, 
still it may not be uninteresting to the general 
reader to follow out a succinct review of those 
peculiarities, which draw a line of demarcation 
between the pigeons and the gallinaceous, or 
other orders of the feathered race. 

The gallinaceous birds are polygamous, and 
the females lay numerous eggs; the young are 
hatched in a very developed state, and soon 
run about and feed themselves. Pigeons, on 
the contrary, pair; and it would appear that 
in general a single male and female remain 
mated for life. Both work in concert in the 
construction of a rude inartificial nest, in 
which the female deposits two eggs, on which 
the male and female sit in turn. The young 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON Group. 115 


are hatched blind, unfledged, naked, and help- 
less, and require the assiduous care of their 
parents, even for some time after they are able 
to leave the nest. Consequently they are fed 
by the parents, and herewith is connected one 
of the most singular points in the economy of 
these birds, which indicates their far remove 
from any of the gallinaceous order. 

Most persons have had an opportunity of 
seeing pigeons feeding their young; the old 
birds place their beaks in the open mouth of 
the young, and by means of a voluntary action 
transfer nutriment from their own crop into 
that of their nestlings. Many naturalists have 
supposed the nutriment thus transferred to 
be nothing more than the macerated grain, or 
peas which have been previously swallowed ; 
but this is not correct ; for at first the young 
are not capable of digesting this coarse aliment. 
They are, in fact, fed by a secretion closely 
analogous to milk, and poured out from cer- 
tain glands in the crop, both of the male and 
female, but at the time only when such a 
secretion is needed. This fact was correctly 
ascertained by the celebrated John Hunter. 
** During incubation (he says) the coats of the 
crop in the pigeon are gradually enlarged and 


116 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


thickened, like what happens to the udder of 
females of the class mammalia, during the term 
of gestation. On comparing the state of the 
crop when the bird is not sitting with its ap- 
pearance during incubation, the difference is 
remarkable. In the first case it is thin and 
membraneous, but by the time the young are 
about to be hatched, the whole, except what 
lies on the windpipe, becomes thickened and 
takes a glandular appearance, having its in- 
ternal surface very irregular. It is likewise 
more vascular than in its former state, that it 
may convey a quantity of blood sufficient for 
the secretion of this substance, which is to 
nourish the young brood for some days after 
they are hatched. Whatever may be the con- 
sistence of this substance when just secreted, 
it most probably soon coagulates into a granu- 
lated white curd; for in such a form I have 
found it in the crop, and if an old pigeon is 
killed just as the young ones are hatching, the 
crop will be found as above described, and in 
its cavity pieces of curd mixed with some of 
the common food of the pigeon, such as barley, 
beans, ete. If we allow either of the parents 
to feed the young, its crop when examined, 
will be discovered to contain the same curdled 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GRouP. 117 


substance, which passes thence into the stomach 
(of the young), where it is to be digested.” 
‘The young pigeon is fed for some time with 
this substance only, and about the third day 
some of the common food is found mingled 
with it; as the pigeon grows older the pro- 
portion of common food is increased, so that 
by the time it is seven, eight, or nine days 
old, the secretion of curd ceases in the old 
ones, and, of course, no more will be found in 
the crop of the young.” 

“Tt is a curious fact, that the parent pigeon 
has at first the power to throw up this curd, 
without any mixture of common food, though 
afterwards both are thrown up according to 
the proportion required for the young ones: 
I have called this substance curd, not as being 
literally so, but as resembling that more than 
anything I know; it may, however, have a 
greater resemblance to curd than anything we 
are aware of; for neither this secretion, nor 
the curd from which the whey has been pressed, 
seem to contain any sugar, and do not run 
into the acetous fermentation.” (On Anim. 
Econ.) 

Montagu calls this a milky or lacteal secre- 
tion, and rightly regards it as “cammon to 


118 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


both sexes of the dove genus,” and from our 
own observations we should say that the curd 
is mixed up with a fluid secretion in the crop 
previously to being transferred into that of the 
young,—nay, sometimes so abundant is this 
fluid that we have seen it drip from the bills 
of the old birds, both while feeding their young, 
and at other times. 

Though nothing like this lacteous secretion 
for the support of the newly-hatched young is 
produced by any of the truly gallinaceous 
tribes, yet we must not suppose that it is 
altogether limited to the pigeons. Some, if 
not all of the parrots, as John Hunter observes, 
appear to be endowed with the same faculty, 
and it will, perhaps, be found to prevail 
amongst the passerine tribes more extensively 
than is suspected by naturalists. 

Besides this great point of distinction 
between the columbine and gallinaceous birds, 
and the other grounds of dissimilarity to which 
we have advyerted, the following may also be 
enumerated. Instead while drinking, of taking 
water into the mouth and elevating the head, 
in order to swallow, as we see the fowl do, the 
pigeon simply takes a continuous draught. 
White says—‘ Most birds drink sipping at 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. 119 


intervals, but pigeons take a long-continued 
draught, like quadrupeds.” 

The hind toe, instead of being elevated on 
the leg, or tarsus, in the pigeon, is upon the 
same plane as the anterior toes; it is fairly 
pressed to the ground in walking, and em- 
braces the roost in perching. Again, the wings 
are long, the quill feathers firm, and the flight 
remarkable for rapidity and endurance. To 
these rules there are certain exceptions, some 
of the more terrestrial species of pigeon being 
found to approximate in some degree, as it 
respects these particulars, to the gallinaceous 
tribes, while, at the same time, no one can 
mistake their true affinities. Two species of 
crowned pigeon* (Lophyrus) for example are 
known, both from the Moluccas, New Guinea, 
etc. Yet these large and heavy birds, almost 
exclusively terrestrial in their habits, and ex- 
ceeding a fowl in size, are in essential structure 
true pigeons, though the wings and limbs 
approximate to those of gallinaceous birds. 

We will not here enter into technical 
details, but we believe that, in a thorough 
examination of the internal organization, the 


* Both species haye been kept alive (1845) in the gardens 
of the Zool, Soc, 


120 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


opinion which goes to associate the columbine 
tribes into an order distinct from any other, 
will be found to be completely justified. 

De Blainville places the pigeons in an order 
which he calls Sponsores. The prince of 
Musignano terms them Gyrantes, (in allusion 
to their circular flight.) In the ‘‘ Museum of 
Animated Nature” they are termed Gyratores. 

Tue Domestic Piazon. — The domestic 
pigeon is divided into almost innumerable 
varieties, from the high-bred carrier to 
the ordinary race of the dovecote; yet, di- 
versified as they are in appearance, they 
are all, according to the opinion of those who 
have investigated the subject, descendants of 
the common rock doye,* (Columba livia.) To 
this opinion, were we not from experience 
aware of the difficulty of keeping up any 
remarkable strain in its purity, we should 
hesitate to subscribe; and we are not quite 
sure that there is not some ancient admixture 
of allied species, (as we believe to be in the 
instance of the dog,) whence, perhaps, arises 
a certain constitutional tendency to assume, at 
indefinite periods, varieties of form and con- 


* Not the stock dove, (Col. Zinas,) which is a forest or wood- 
land bird, and has obtained its title in error. 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. 121 


tout. We doubt much whether any plans of 
treatment or inter-breeding would ever produce 
a carrier or horseman, so singularly specific 
are they in their characters, and of this we are 
sure, that if the breed be once extinct, no arts 
will ever consummate its renewal. Other 
varieties are far more easily accounted for,— 
but this, of ancient lineage, descended from a 
remote line of oriental ancestry, has continued 
in distinctness to the present day. ‘True, it 
has been interbred with baser strains by 
fanciers ; but more or less pure, its distinctive 
characters yet survive, often in high perfection. 
We may say the same, with some reservation, 
respecting the barb,—a black pigeon with an 
occipital crest and a naked circle of scarlet 
skin round the eyes. 

But before we attempt to give a sketch, 
(and a sketch only, for we are not of the 
fancy,) of the principal varieties of the domestic 
pigeon, it may be as well to turn our atten- 
tion to their assumed origin, the rock pigeon, 
and give a brief history of its general habits 
and economy. 

Tae Rock Piceon (Columba livia).—Ie 
Biset and Le Rocheraye of the French writers, 
Piccione de Rocca, ete., of the Italians, Colom- 


122 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


men of the ancient British, is a bird of wide 
dispersion. It is a native of the British 
islands, breeding upon the sea-side rocks. It 
abounds in the Orkneys and Hebrides, along 
the rocky shores of Wales, and various other 
places on our coasts, not excepting old towers, 
and ruins a few miles inland, as we ourselves 
can personally testify. Throughout Europe, 
the same observations apply ; along the coasts 
of France, Spain, and Italy, it frequents in 
multitudes the same localities. The rocky 
islands of the Mediterranean are its favourite 
abodes; it was known of old in Greece; it 
abounds in northern Africa, and along the 
Asiatic shores far into India. And here we 
cannot but advert to a passage in the Zool. 
Proc. 1832, respecting a pigeon noticed by 
colonel Sykes in his account of the birds of the 
Dukhun. The passage is as follows: ‘ Co- 
lumba Afnas, Linn, Stock-pigeon, parwa of 
the Mahrattas. The*most common bird in 
the Dukhun, congregating in flocks of scores, 
and a constant inhabitant of every old dilapi- 
dated building. Colonel Sykes saw the same 
species on board ship on the voyage to Eng- 
land brought from China. Irides, orange, ete. 
The Dukhun bird differs from the European 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GRoup. 123 


species in the biil being black,* instead of 
pale red, in the utter want of white in the 
quills; the want of white in the tail-feathers; 
and in the legs being brownjy instead of 
black. As these differences are permanent, 
they might justify a specific name being 
applied to the Dukhun pigeon.” 

Now we hesitate not to say that this bird 
was not the Stock-dove (C. Anas) nor any 
variety of it, but the Rock-dove (C. Livia) or 
a closely allied species (if not mere variety), 
and this might be presumed from the fact 
alone of its inhabiting old dilapidated build- 
ings. Selby speaking of the Rock-dove says, 
‘*‘ Aithough this species seems to have fallen 
frequently under the notice of our orni- 
thologists (as may be gathered from their 
descriptions and the localities they have given 
to it,) yet it has always been attended by the 
original supposition of this and the preceding 
species (stock-dove) being identical. In form 
and size they very nearly agree, the rock-dove 
being, perhaps, rather more slender. The 
predominant shades of each are also much 

* Bill blackish brown. Selby, art. Rock-dove. 


+ Legs pale purplish red. Selby, art. Rock-dove. Bright 
ecchineal red in the stock-dove,—Idem, 


124 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


the same; the principal variations consisting 
in the colour of the rump, which, in the stock- 
dove, is invariably bluish grey, but in the rock- 
dove generally white, in the two distinct 
bands of bars (of black) crossing the wings of 
the latter bird, and in the colour of the breast 
and belly, which, in the former bird (stock- 
dove) is more of a purplish red. The dis- 
similarity of their habits, however, marks 
even more strongly the specific difference be- 
tween them, than the proofs drawn from the 
plumage, the stock-dove being a constant 
inhabitant of the woods, and frequently the 
interior of the country;* but the species 
under consideration is in its wild state always 
met with inhabiting rocky places, and these 
principally on the sea-coast.” 

White, in his natural history of Selborne, 
clearly distinguishes between the stock-dove 
which frequents the beech-woods, and the 
rock-dove. ‘‘ For my own part (he says ina 
letter to Pennant) I readily concur with you 
in supposing that house-doves are derived 
from the small blue rock-pigeon for many 
reasons. In the first place, the wild stock- 
dove is manifestly larger than the common 


* It is migratory. 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. 125 


house-dove, against the usual rule of domesti- 
cation, which generally enlarges the breed. 
Again, those two remarkable black spots on 
the remiges of each wing of the stock-dove 
would not, one would think, be totally lost by 
its being reclaimed, but would often break out 
among its descendants. But what is worth a 
hundred arguments is the instance you give 
in sir Roger Mostyn’s house-doves in Carnar- 
vonshire, which, though tempted by plenty 
of food and gentle treatment, can never be 
prevailed upon to inhabit their cote for any 
time; but as soon as they begin to breed 
betake themselves to the fastnesses of Arms- 
head, and deposit their young in safety amidst 
the inaccessible caverns and precipices of that 
stupendous promontory.” 

Wild pigeons, as we have often noticed, not 
unfrequently take up their abode in the holes 
and fissures of old ruins, church towers or 
steeples, or similar places, and that at a con- 
siderable distance inland, nay, even remote 
from the sea. But whether these are true 
rock-doves, or house-pigeons returned to a 
state of independence, or a mixture of both, 
it is not always easy to determine. Great 
numbers frequent Canterbury cathedral; 


126 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


mostly they are blue, but as other colours 
occur, it is not improbable that there is a 
mixture of house pigeons with true wild 
pigeons. 

The markets of London during the season 
are supplied with vast quantities of young 
pigeons or squabs, mostly of a leaden blue 
colour ; and in various parts, large dove-cotes 
are kept for the express purpose of remitting 
their produce to the market. It would be 
difficult to distinguish between these blue 
dove-cote pigeons and the wild rock-dove. 
We haye seen vast flocks of dove-cote pigeons 
in France, amongst which the prevailing 
colour was blue. 

The rock-dove feeds on grain and seeds of 
various kinds, yet not exclusively, for accord- 
ing to Montagu it is very fond of various 
species of snail, and especially that inhabiting 
the shell termed Helix virgata. About three 
broods are reared every season. 

Turning from the rock-dove, to its tame 
representative, the common dove-cote pigeon, 
we may observe that in most countries it is 
kept in abundance for the supply of the table, 
and the markets of most large towns are plen- 
tifully supplied, In Persia, however, though 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON Group. 1927 


large dove-cotes, like towers, are conspicuous 
objects near towns and villages, it is not for 
the table that these birds are reared, but for 
the sake of the dung, which is used as a 
manure for melon grounds ; it is in fact a sort 
of “Guano,” the supply of which is regularly 
kept up, especially in the neighbourhood of 
Ispahan, where the melons are celebrated for 
their superiority. This manure is dear, but 
almost indispensable. 

These dove-cote pigeons of Persia are all of 
a leaden blue colour; a white pigeon is in 
fact so rare as to be regarded as a sort of 
prodigy, and formerly was looked upon with 
superstitious aversion. In the outskirts of 
Ispahan, the pigeon-houses are striking ob- 
jects, and at a distance might be taken for 
towers of defence or lofty strong-holds ; they 
are generally surmounted by smaller towers, 
capped with a sugar-loaf spire, having aper- 
tures for the entrance and exit of the birds. 
The inside is replete with breeding cells, in 
close array, for the accommodation of many 
hundreds. From these towers vast clouds of 
pigeons issue, wheeling about in masses so ex- 
tensive and compact, as to obscure the sun 
when they pass overhead, Yet it would 


128 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


appear that such numbers are not now kept, 
as were formerly, for some of the pigeon- 
towers are almost or quite tenantless; still, 
however, the multitudes are very great, and 
the noise of their wings as they suddenly rush 
forth when alarmed is astounding. Our classic 
readers may remember Virgil’s beautiful simile 
of the frightened dove rushing from her 
rocky cavern, of which the following is Dry- 
den’s translation : 


** As when the dove her rocky hold forsakes, 
Rous’d in a fright her sounding wings she shakes 
The cavern rings with clattering, out she fiies 
And leaves her callow care, and cleaves the skies; 
At first she flutters, but at length she springs 
To smoother flight, and shoots upon her wings.” 
ZENEID, l. v. 


The clattering of a single dove is but a 
whisper compared to the roar of accumulated 
thousands. 

In the east generally, pigeons, from the 
earliest times, have been great favourites and 
kept in multitudes. The author of the ‘‘Phy- 
sical History of Palestine’ says, ‘‘The in- 
habitauts of Syria and Palestine are fond of 
pigeons, like the western Asiatics generally. 
Conspicuous dove-cotes are seen profusely in 
most of the villages, and vast flocks of wild 
doves appear about the time the corn begins 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. 129 


to ripen, and remain till the harvest is over. 
In Scripture, the allusions to doves and 
pigeons are so numerous as to evince that they 
were equally common and equally valued in 
ancient times.* In Egypt also, now, as an- 
ciently, incredible numbers of these birds are 
kept, and in the villages, the dwellings made 
for them are at the least as conspicuous as 
those which man builds for himself.” We 
cannot definitely ascertain whether the pigeon 
was among the sacred birds of the ancient 
Egyptians. 

Our account of the purpose for which 
pigeons are kept in such vast numbers in 
Persia recalls to mind a passage of some 
difficulty in the Second Book of Kings, chap. 
vi. 25,—‘‘and the fourth part of a cab of 
dove’s dung (sold) for five pieces of silver.” 
Was it for this as a manure that such multi- 
tudes of pigeons were annually kept in Syria 
and Egypt? and is its use as such, a remnant 
of antique practice, still lingering in Persia? 

* Jeremiah thus alludes to the wild rock-dove. ‘‘O ye that 
dwell in Moab, leave the cities and dwell in the rock, and be like 
the dove, that maketh her nest in the sides of the hole’s mouth.” 
Jer. xviii. 28. Isaiah takes the following simile from the 
domestic or house-dove, of which great numbers were anciently 


kept in Palestine. ‘‘ Who are these that dy as a cloud, and 
as the doves to their windows ?’’—Isaiah Ix. 8 


E 


1380 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Is the use of guano after all, an agricultural 
art of high antiquity? We will not trust 
ourselves to answer. The following passage 
from the Pictorial Bible gives a compendium 
of all that has been mooted on the subject. 
«The fourth part of a cab of dove’s dung for 
five pieces of silver. This was about half a 
pint for 12s. 6d. There has been much diver- 
sity of opinion about the ‘dove’s dung.’ 
Some of the rabbins inform us that it was 
used for fuel. Josephus says, that it was 
purchased for its salt. Some think it means 
grain taken from the crops of pigeons, which 
could of course get out of the beseigedtown and 
feed in the open country ; many believe that it 
was wanted for manure, and Bochait, foliowed 
by most modern commentators, contends that, 
the name though literally dove’s dung means an 
article of vegetable food. As he observes, the 
Arabs give the name of dove’s dung to a kind 
of moss that grows on trees and strong ground, 
and also to a sort. of pulse or pea which ap- , 
pears to have been very common in Judea, and 
which may be the article here indicated. Large 
quantities of it are parched and dried and 
stored in magazines at Cairo and Damascus. 
It is much used during journeys, and parti. 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. Tey 


cularly by the great pilgrim caravan to Mecca ; 
and if the conjecture be correct, it may be 
supposed to have been among the provisions 
stored up in the besieged city, and sold at the 
extravagant price mentioned in the text. It is 
clear that if dove’s dung be really intended, it 
could not be used as an article of food, and 
then we are thrown upon its use as manure. 
This use is best exemplified in Persia. These 
form such essential articles of food in some 
warm climates, that vast quantities are con- 
sumed, and in besieged towns persons who 
have been rather delicately brought up have 
been known to pine away and die for the 
want of such essential provisions, even when 
corn was abundant. On this point, Mr. Morier 
observes, ‘the dung of doves is the dearest 
raanure which the Persians use, and as they 
apply it almost entirely to the rearing of 
melons, it is probably on that account that 
the melons of Ispahan are so much finer 
than those of other cities. The revenue of a 
pigeon-house is about a hundred tomauns 
per annum ; and the great value of this dung 
which rears a fruit that is indispensable to 
the existence of the natives during the great 
heats of summer, will probably throw some 


E 2 


132 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


light on that passage in Scripture, where in 
the famine of Samaria, the fourth part of a 
cab of dove’s dung was sold for five pieces of 
silver.’ (Second Journey, p. 141.) We think 
that the alternatives lie between this explana- 
tion and that which Bochart has given, 
although neither of them seems entirely free 
from grounds of objection.” 

If the cities of the east, such as Samaria, 
resembled modern London and Paris, the 
utility of manure for the growth of vegetables 
would be out of all question, but such was not 
the case. Detached houses, with surrounding 
gardens,—large spaces, used for the rearing of 
culinary vegetables—streets rather resembling 
lanes than the streets of a European city of 
the present day, and the whole surrounded 
by a wall of brick, or mud and stones, with 
towers at given distances, — such was, and 
such is still a city of Western Asia; and when 
the uncouth catapult, the sling, and the bow 
were the only projectile weapons, these rude 
fortifications were more difficult to be carried 
than a town of modern Europe would now be 
(Vauban himself having fortified it) by a few 
thousand men with artillery, and the arts of 
modern warfare, 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON Group. 1383 


We may here leave the common dovecote, 
or farm-yard pigeon, and proceed to take a 
brief survey of the principal varieties, some of 
them of great antiquity, which naturalists 
generally agree have resulted from long cul- 
ture in a state of domestication. These 
varieties are extremely numerous, and by 
inter-crossing, others are from time to time 
produced, to the delight or disappointment of 
the fancier, as he may succeed or fail in the 
accomplishment of his wishes. 

The Carrier, or Horseman.—We do not 
separate between these birds, because we know 
of no difference between them: at all events, 
if any originally existed, it has become lost, 
and we believe the terms carrier and horse- 
man are by most fanciers of the present day 
used synonymously. The carrier exceeds most 
other varieties of domestic pigeons in size; 
and is remarkable for the elegance of its 
shape. It is among pigeons, what the high- 
bred racer is among horses, and has been long 
celebrated for its rapidity of flight. It is 
evidently of eastern origin, and was known to 
the ancients. 

The plumage of the carrier is close and firm, 
and the quill feathers remarkably rigid; the 


134 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


colour is black, blue, or dun,—birds of the 
latter tint being highly prized, if perfect in 
other qualities. The neck is long and slender, 
the shoulders wide apart and strongly knit, 
aud the breast muscular. The eye is animated, 
with the iris of a fiery red, a rosette or wide 
rose-like circle of white fungous skin, sur- 
rounds the eye, and is even elevated (in 
mature birds) above the level of the skull. 
This circle, about the size of a shilling, should 
be uniform,—free from irregularities, and well 
developed. The beak is long,* straight, and 
stout, especially at the base, which is sur- 
rounded by a large mass of white fungous 
skin, greatly elevated above the base of the 
upper mandible, and advancing on the fore- 
head. ‘This protuberance or wattle should be 
regularly formed, rise boldly, and spread 
broadly across the beak.+ The head is long 
and narrow, and the skull should be flat or 
even depressed on the top, and of contracted 
breadth between the elevated rosettes. For 
- perfect birds, great prices are demanded; and 

* From an inch and a quarter to an inch and a half, along the 
gape. _ 

+ The fungous excrescence is only a development of the soft 


pulpy skin at the base of the upper mandible in the ordinary 
pigeons, where the nostrils are situated, 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GRouP. 1385 


we certainly think that of all the varieties of 
the domestic pigeon none are so worthy of 
attention by those whose inclination leads them 
to the innocent amusement of cultivating fine 
races of the feathered tribes reclaimed by man. 

Dr. Kitto, in his Physical History of Pales- 
tine, notices the carrier pigeon as being still 
kept in Syria, and we know that from very 
ancient times, it has been employed in the 
east as a rapid and not to be intercepted con- 
veyer of intelligence. Bochart has collected 
numerous authorities on this subject, both in 
Greece and Syria. The following passage is 
from the pen of an accomplished zoologist in 
the Penny Magazine. ‘In one of his odes 
Anacreon has immortalized it, (the carrier 
pigeon,) as the bearer of epistles. Taurosthenes 
sent to his expectant father, who resided in 
Aigina, the glad tidings of his success in the 
olympic games, on the very day of his victory. 
Pliny speaks of the communication kept up 
between Hirtius and Decimus Brutus at the 
siege of Mutina, (Modena.) ‘ What availed 
Antony, the trench, and the watch of the . 
besiegers,—what availed the nets stretched 
across the river, while the messenger was cleay- 
ing the air?’ The crusaders employed them, 


136 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS- 


and Joinville records an instance during the 
crusade of Saint Louis. Tasso sings of one 
that was attacked by a falcon, and defended 
by Godfrey. It had a letter attached to its 
neck, which letter Godfrey, of course, reads, 
and is put in possession of all the secrets. In 
the very same way, Ariosto makes the Castellan 
di Damiatze spread the news of Orrilo’s death 
all over Egypt. Sir John Maundeville, knight, 
warrior, and pilgrim, who penetrated to the 
borders of China, in the reigns of our second 
and third Edward, thus writes :—‘ In that 
contree and other contrees bezonde thei han a 
custom, whan thei sohulle usen werre, and 
whan men holden sege abouten cytee or 
castelle, and they withinnen dur not senden 
out messengers with lettere for lord to lord, 
for to ask sokour, thei maken here letters and 
binden them to the neck of a Colver, and 
letten the Colver flee; and the Colveren ben 
so taughte, that they fleen with the letters to 
the very place that men wolde sende hem to. 
For the colveres ben norysscht in tho places, 
where thei ben sent to ; and thei senden hem 
thus for to beren here letters. And the colveres 
retournen azain where as thei ben norisscht, 
and so they don commouuly,’ ” 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. 137 


We learn from Dr. Russell that “this 
pigeon in former times was employed by the 
English factory, to convey intelligence from 
Scanderoon of the arrival of the company’s 
ships in that port. The name of the ship, 
the hour of her arrival, and whatever else 
could be comprised in a small compass, being 
written on a slip of paper, was secured in such 
a manner under the pigeon’s wing as not to 
impede its flight, and her feet were bathed in 
vinegar, with a view to keep them cool and 
prevent her being tempted by the sight of 
water to alight, by which the journey might 
have been prolonged, or the billet lost. The 
practice has been in disuse many years, but I 
have heard it asserted by an English gentle- 
man, in whose time it still subsisted, that he 
had known the pigeons perform the journey 
(to Aleppo) in two hours and a half. The 
messenger had a young brood at Aleppo, and 
was sent down in an uncovered cage to 
Scanderoon, from whence, as soon as set at 
liberty she returned with all expedition to 
her nest. It was usual at the season of the 
arrival of the annual ships, to send pigeons 
to be ready at the port, and by all accounts 
if the bird remained absent above a fortnight 

ES 


138 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


she was apt to forget her young, and, there- 
fore, not fit to be trusted. Upon inquiring 
into the manner of training the pigeon for 
this service, I was told by some that she was 
at once sent down to Scanderoon in a cage ; 
but I am rather inclined to believe what was 
affirmed by others, that she was taught by 
_ degrees to fly from shorter distances on the 
Scanderoon road.” 

It would appear that these pigeons, when 
let fly from Scanderoon, instead of bending 
their course towards the high mountains sur- 
rounding the plain, mounted at once directly 
up, soaring almost perpendicularly till out of 
sight, as if to surmount at once the obstacles 
intercepting a view of their place of destina- 
tion. It is not often in the present day that 
the carrier pigeon is employed on really im- 
portant services, yet in the late sir D. Wilkie’s 
picture of the siege of Saragossa, a carrier 
pigeon is in the hands of one of the party, 
either returning with news, or about to be 
despatched. Doubtless, the great painter had 
good authority for it. 

It must not be supposed that this peculiar 
breed of pigeon is exclusively fitted for the 
purposes above described ;:any breed of good 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. 139 


powers of flight will do, but this bird, from 
its swiftness on the wing, and its muscular 
energy, is doubtless superior; nevertheless, 
old birds, if not kept in active training, are 
heavy, and disinclined to very long flights. 
We once purchased a very young pair of black 
carriers, and having kept them shut up for a 
few weeks gave them their liberty; after several 
circles high in the air, they started off in one 
direction, straight as an arrow, till far out of 
sight. We gave them up for lost, and having 
paid a considerable sum for them, were not a 
little annoyed. This happened about eleven, 
a.m. At about four, p.m., while on the look 
out we heard a whirring of wings, and imme- 
diately the two birds settled on their dovecote, 
and were eager for food and drink. Let it 
be remembered that they had never been 
previously at liberty, and yet after a voluntary 
excursion of many miles, they returned with 
unerring precision to their home; this was 
repeated so often, till they began to breed, 
that it gave us no concern respecting their 
safety, the more especially as they flew above 
gun-shot reach. 

Is it by the eye that these birds travel 
from long distances to their home? We 


140 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


cannot doubt it. Hence, if very long distances 
are to be achieved, training is requisite; they 
must be accustomed by a graduated series of 
removals, to at least the greater part of the 
road; and even then, if a fog obscures their 
way-marks, they are apt to wander and be 
lost. ; 
Occasionally we hear of trials of the power 
of the pigeon (we know not whether the birds 
are always carriers or not) which are not a 
little surprising. A given number of birds 
for example will be turned off in some town in 
Holland, Belgium, or France, destined for 
London, or vice versd; we read of the safe 
‘arrival of at least the greater number, and of 
the short space of time in which the journey 
is accomplished. In such cases, two or three 
practised birds to take the lead will, no doubt, 
prove good guides to the rest, which, in their 
turn, having safely arrived, will guide others. 
Short distances, however, will easily be per- 
formed without much training. Our theory 
is as follows: a carrier pigeon is taken toa 
distance, say a hundred miles from home, 
it is turned loose, it mounts to a great eleva- 
tion, and performs a series of circles, wider 
and wider still. At home, it has performed 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON Grour. 141 


the same. Now from any part of the circle, 
let it perceive an object, which while per- 
forming its circles at home, has caught its eye, 
it has at once a clue to the right direction ; 
that object attained, a succession of others 
familiar to it are rapidly passed, till its home 
greets its keen and long-surveying powers of 
vision. 

This idea struck us forcibly when viewing 
the prospect from Mont Cassel, near St. Omer. 
Though this conical mount, once a Roman 
military occupation, is of no very great eleva- 
tion, we saw an amphitheatre around us of 
from fifty to sixty miles in nearly every direc- 
tion, and across the Manche the white cliffs of 
the Kentish coast. If a long-sighted pigeon 
had soared above us, say at the elevation of 
one mile (its home being in London) we feel 
assured that its old familiar land-marks would 
have been at once discerned by it, and have 
been guide-posts, to direct it in its homeward 
flight. 

Audubon speaking of the passenger pigeon 
of North America, says that specimens have 
been killed in the neighbourhood of New York, 
with their crops full of rice, which must have 
been collected in the fields of Georgia and 


142 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Carolina, those districts being the nearest, in 
which they could have collected a supply of 
that grain. The swiftness of the carrier 
pigeon is equal to that of the passenger 
pigeon, and is very great, but then much time 
is lost while it mounts and makes its circles of 
observation, before it starts fairly on its 
course. Perhaps the average rapidity is fifty 
or sixty miles an hour; but it can wing its 
way still more expeditiously, when eager to 
regain its home, and no very great difficulties 
have to be encountered. M. Antoine informs 
us that a gentleman residing in Cologne, 
called by business to Paris, laid a considerable 
wager that he would give information to his 
friends of his safe arrival, within three hours. 
The distance is a hundred leagues; the ac- 
complishment of the object seemed impossible, 
and the wager was at once accepted. He had 
brought from Cologne two carrier pigeons, 
which had nestlings, and arriving at Paris at 
ten in the morning, he tied a letter to each 
bird and despatched them both at eleven 
precisely. One of these pigeons arrived at 
Cologne at five minutes past one o’clock, and 
in nine minutes afterwards the other came in; 
hence, supposing their flight to have been 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON Grour. 148 


direct from an elevation rapidly attained, it 
could not have been much below the ratio of 
a hundred and forty or fifty miles an hour. 
This was, indeed, an extraordinary instance of 
speed, to which we do not know a parallel, 
unless Montagu be correct, who estimates the 
flight of the Peregrine falcon, when pursuing 
its quarry, at the rate of one hundred and fifty 
miles an hour. 

Tue Dracoon, or Dracon.—This variety 
presents, in an inferior degree, the characters 
of the carrier, and appears to be a cross breed 
between that variety, and the tumbler or ordi- 
nary dove-cote runt. It is smaller and lighter 
in contour than the earrier, with the carun- 
culated skin at the base of the beak and 
around the eyes less developed, but with the 
general figure similar. It is a bird of great 
powers of flight, but though rapid for short 
distances, it wants the power of muscular 
endurance requisite for the swift accomplish- 
ment of very long journeys. 

Tue Pourer.—This large pigeon, formerly 
highly valued by fanciers, and bred with much 
care, and no little expense, is originally the 
product of a cross between the dragoon and 
the old Dutch cropper, so called from the 


144 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


development of its crop; but which, in form 
and proportions, had little to recommend it. 
All pigeons are capable of inflating their crop 
with air, and thus of distending it. In the 
pouter, the crop is remarkably capacious, and, 
when inflated, assumes an almost globular 
form, extending from the under mandible to 
the top of the chest. This vast inflation of 
the crop does not, in our eyes, add anything 
to the beauty of the bird, as it produces an 
appearance of distortion, while the bird in 
order to carry it with ease is obliged to carry 
itself upright, with the legs straight and stiff, 
in a line with the erect body. Some think 
this gives the bird a majestic air, but it seems 
to us to be a stiff unnatural strut. The 
pouter often measures eighteen inches in 
length from the point of the beak to the end 
of the tail; the legs, or tarsi, are long and 
covered with fine white down; the back is 
concave, and the tail large. The general 
colours are blue, rufous, or fawn, regularly 
pied with white; we have seen many of a pure 
white, but these are not preferred. In the 
arrangement of the markings, and in various 
minor details, pigeon fanciers find much to 
interest themselves; to us they appear un- 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GRouP. 145 


worthy of serious attention. Two varieties 
of the pouter are respectively termed the 
Parisian pouter and the uploper; but of these 
we do not know that we have ever seen any 
specimens. ‘The former is beautifully mottled 
and variegated. 

Tuer Bars.—The name of this variety seems 
to indicate that it was originally brought 
from the north of Africa. It is a bird of re- 
markable appearance ; there is a small carun- 
culated wattle at the base of the beak, which 
latter is short and thick, and a rather large 
naked circle of bright red spongy skin sur- 
rounds the eye; a short crest of prettily 
circled feathers generally ornaments the back 
of the head. The plumage is of a uniform 
black, occasionally dun. 

Tue Fan-rart.—Among the more curious 
varieties of the domestic pigeon must be 
enumerated the fan-tail or broad-tailed shaker. 
These appellations it acquires from the pecu- 
liarity of its tail, which is carried in a man- 
ner very similar to that of a common hen, but 
rather more expanded. In proportion to the 
size of the bird, it is also more ample, being 
composed of four and twenty feathers, and, in 
some cases, even six and thirty, instead of the 


146 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


ordinary number, twelve. This development 
of supernumerary tail feathers is very remark- 
able, and would alone give the bird a strange 
aspect ; but besides this, it has the habit of 
throwing back its slender delicate neck till 
the head almost touches the tail, while, at the 
same time, the neck quivers with a tremulous 
motion. In this attitude, the chest is thrown 
forward, and the wings droop, while the bird 
seems to exult in the display. The beak is 
very short, the head small, and the plumage 
generally of a pure snowy white. Pied birds 
are not .in estimation. There is a variety 
called the narrow-tailed shaker, which appears’ 
to us to be nothing more than a cross between 
the fan-tail and some common breed. Neither 
of these birds have much power of flight. 

Tue Jacospine, on Carper.—This pretty 
little variety is remarkable for the develop- 
ment, silkiness, and reversion of the plumes of 
the back and sides of the neck, which are so 
disposed as to form a sort of full hood or muff 
in which the head is almost buried. The head 
is small, the beak short, the iris of the eye of 
a clear pearl colour. The plumage varies in 
colour, but fawn-yellow birds are preferred : 
the head, the quill-feathers, and the tail, are 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON Group. 147 


white. In powers of flight the jacobine is 
very inferior, but is much valued for its beauty. 
There are two allied varieties, the ruff and the 
capuchin, neither of which, however, are so 
much esteemed as the jacobine, the general 
characters of which they exhibit, but in an 
inferior degree. 

Tue Tursit.—This is a small pigeon, re- 
markable for a frill on the top of the chest, 
consisting of a tuft of feathers, which opens 
and spreads both ways laterally with a curl; 
this is termed a ‘“purle.’” The head is 
small, the beak short, the colour various, but 
the under parts and quill feathers are usually 
white, An allied variety is called the owl, 
from the crookedness of its beak, which is 
short, stout, and curved. Its chest is frilled. 

Tur Nun.—This pigeon is very pretty, and 
much admired from the contrast of its mark- 
ings. The general plumage is white, with the 
exception of the head, quill feathers and tail, 
which are yellow, blue, or black; the latter the 
most preferred. On the top of the coloured 
head, is a white tuft of carded feathers, which, 
from a fancied resemblance to a veil, has 
obtained for this variety its appellation. The 
beak is small, the iris pearl-white. A variety 


148 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


called the helmet is closely allied to the pre- 
ceding, but instead of a full tuft or hood on 
the head, has a crest somewhat resembling 
that of a helmet. In other respects, there is 
no difference, except, perhaps, that the latter 
is rather the largest bird. 

Ture Trumpeter.—This variety is not often 
seen. It has a tuft on the back of the head, 
and another springing above the base of the 
beak over the forehead; the legs and toes are 
feathered. The plumage is generally mottled. 
Its cooing in the spring is loud and harsh, 
whence it has obtained the name of trumpeter. 

Tue Tumsier.—The tumbler is a small 
pigeon, much esteemed for the peculiarity of 
its flight, and when a flock is on the wing, the 
sight is not uninteresting. The title of tum- 
bler is given in allusion to the backward sum- 
mersets, often several times repeated, which 
these birds make in the air, but whether from 
amusement, or from some cause or other they 
become overbalanced, is not very clear; we 
have observed that when they prepare to alight, 
these somersets are most frequently repeated, 
and as it would seem, hinder the bird for some 
time from accomplishing its object. Perhaps, 
however, this is all in playfulness, for the 


THE COLUMBINE, OR PIGEON GROUP. 149 


tumbler is a bird of great powers of flight, and 
mounts to such an elevation, as sometimes to 
be scarcely visible; it can also continue on the 
wing for several hours together, a circumstance 
which gives it value in the eyes of many, who 
delight to watch the circular movements of a 
flock of these birds, in close array, soaring at a 
vast altitude. ; 

The tumbler pigeon varies in colour, whence 
have arisen various distinctive appellations, as 
bald-headed tumblers, the head being white ; 
and bearded tumblers either blue or black, with 
a white moustache or stripe, extending from 
the base of the beak. The head is small and 
round, the beak short, and spine-shaped, the 
iris a clear pearl-white, the chest full and broad, 
the neck rather short, but slender, and the 
general contour compact. This variety is kept 
in great abundance in London. 

Tae Atmonp or Ermine Tumsier.—This 
variety, though derived from the ordinary 
tumbler, is not trained to flight, but is kept 
for its beauty, and the rich and varied admix- 
ture of its colours. It is much less than the 
common tumbler in size, and the beak and 
head are remarkably small; the plumage is 
variegated ; yellow, black, white and brown, 


150 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


or gray, being intermingled in streaks or 
dashes. It is not until after several moults, 
that the perfect colours are attained. 

The above list of varieties of the domestic 
pigeon contains all of any note; several others, 
indeed, might be enumerated, as the Leghorn, 
the Spanish, and the Friesland Runt, (the 
latter having all its feathers reverted,) the 
Lace, the Finniken, the Spot, ete., but they are 
seldom to be seen, nor is any value attached to 
them. 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL GROUP. 


In the natatorial group, or order, we are 
presented with a vast assemblage of birds, more 
or less decidedly constructed for aquatic habits, 
and the more so the more exclusively they tenant 
the waters of the sea, inlets along coasts, the 
mouths of wide rivers and extensive lakes. 
Some, indeed, are so exclusively formed for 
passing the period of their active existence, and 
for pursuing their prey in the water, that on 
the ground their movements are embarrassed 
and awkward in the extreme, and, in a few, the 
powers of flight are utterly abrogated. We are 
now pointing to extreme cases on the one part, 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL GROUP. 151 


for there are others in which the powers of 
flight are wonderful, the water serving only as 
areservoir of food, which is snatched on or near 
its surface, and as an occasional resting place, 
the bird floating buoyantly, till it soars into the 
air. As examples, we may adduce the terns, 
the gulls, the albatross, the petrels, etc., birds 
thickly plumed, and which, in pursuit of their 
prey, make only slight plunges into the sea, 
or skim it off from the rolling waves, and sel- 
dom settle, except for a few minutes. 

Between these extreme links in the chain’ 
there are others of intermediate position, and 
among them is the family comprising ducks, 
swans, and geese. 

We shall not attempt to enter into an ana- 
lysis of the numerous sub-divisions, of this 
extensive family, (termed Anatide,) but only 
offer a few general observations. 

In the ducks, swans, and geese, the body 
is more or less boat-shaped, and covered with 
dense plumage, there being an under-layer of 
down next the skin. The feathers repel the 
water, which runs off them. ‘The legs are 
placed considerably backwards, so as to render 
the support of the anterior part of the body 
apparently laborious, and from this cause and 


152 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


the contour of the limbs, their gait on the 
ground is waddling. The three anterior toes 
are united by webs, but the posterior toe is 
free, yet often lobated, or paddle-shaped. The 
bill is large, and more or less depressed, some- 
times very broad; both mandibles are covered 
with a sort of leathery skin abundantly sup- 
plied by nerves of touch; at the base of the 
upper mandible there is a sort of cere, (in 
which the nostrils are placed,) in some more 
extensive than in others, and at the tip of 
the upper mandible is a sort of flat incurved 
hard nail, (called dertrum.) Along the edges 
of each mandibie extends a series of laminated 
processes, sometimes remarkably developed and 
in close array, these serve as strainers, enabling 
the bird to sift the ooze or mud through the 
beak, and retain worms, insects, and vegetable 
matters. The tongue is large, fleshy, sensitive, 
and furnished along its edges with filamentous 
pectinations, which aid the beak in the reten- 
tion of food. The eyes are defended by a 
strong membrana nictitans, and both sight and 
hearing are acute. The voice is hoarse, harsh, 
and clanging: in many species, there is a sort 
of osseous drum at the lower portion of the 
windpipe, in some there are certain dilatations, 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 153 


and in others the windpipe makes singular 
loops or flexures before entering the cavity of 
the chest to merge into the lungs. 

In a state of nature, the males and females 
pair, the young are hatched, covered with 
down, and soon take to the water under the 
guidance of their parents. With respect to 
food, it is very various; some appear to be © 
herbivorous, others feed equally upon animal 
and vegetable substances, and greedily devour 
slugs, caterpillars, and aquatic insects. Others 
live on crabs, and marine shellfish, which they 
dive with great skill to obtain. 

Though these birds are aquatic in their 
habits, and swim well, yet some are much 
more so than others; the goose, which grazes 
on corn lands and fields, is far less aquatic 
than the wild or even tame duck, and resorts 
to the water principally for safety. The cere- 
opsis goose of Australia is still more decidedly 
terrestrial. On the other hand, some species, 
as the New Holland musk duck, the steamer, 
or racehorse duck of the Falkland isles, and 
others, are as aquatic as the divers (Colymbus.) 

Most, if not all the anatidee, in the northern 
hemisphere at least, are migratory, and asso- 
ciated in flocks perform at due times northward. 


154 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


and southward migrations, the former taking 
place on the early breaking up of winter, when 
they revisit their old breeding haunts, the 
latter in autumn, when the cold of the north- 
ern regions commences. In temperate lati- 
tudes, however, like our island,many home-bred 
water-fowl not only remain during the winter, / 
but are joined by northern visitors. During 
flight, they assume a definite order, proceeding 
either in single file, or in the form of a triangle, 
the leader occasionally changing places with 
others. Even when traversing the ground 
they observe a degree of order in the line of 
their march. 

Most species incubate on the ground, but 
some in the holes of trees or on the broad flat 
top of large old pollards, and in situations of a 
similar character. Under these circumstances 
the parents convey the young to the water in 
their beak. The summer, or wood duck, of 
America, (anas sponsa,) pursues this singular 
plan; and even the common wild duck ocea- 
sionally. Certain species, as the anas arborea, 
not only nestle but habitually perch in trees. 

Tur Domestic Ducx.—This species belongs 
to the genus anas as restricted by modern 
naturalists, the male being characterised (at 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group, 155 


certain seasons) by curled feathers in the 
upper tail coverts. The wild origin of our 
domestic duck, is unquestionably the well- 
known species, anas boschas, usually termed 
the mallard, and which appears to be generally 
distributed throughout the temperate and 
colder regions of Europe, Asia, and North 
America. The mallard is smaller than the 
tame duck, of a lighter and more graceful 
figure, and much more quick, observant, and 
prompt in its actions. In the more northern 
regions, it is decidedly migratory. 

The wild duck pairs early in March, some- 
times in the latter part of February, but the 
male deserts his mate, when the duty of incu- 
bation commences, leaving the care of the eggs 
and young entirely to the female. Hence in 
the month of May it is not uncommon to see 
small flocks composed exclusively of males, 
whose mates are fostering their brood. Wilson 
says that both parents take charge of their 
young, but this is an error; the female, only, 
rears them, as was first, we believe, pointed 
out by Mr. Selby. It is in May, moreover, 
that the male begins to change his colours, 
losing the curled tail feathers, and the glossy 
green of the neck, and assuming a plain dress, 


156° ° OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


approximating to that of the female ;* nor is 
it until the autumnal moult, that he recovers 
his brilliant tints and fine pencilling. In 
domestic birds, this change does not occur, or 
only very partially. 

The nest of the wild duck is composed of 
dried rushes, grass, and coarse stalks, and is 
usually placed on the ground under the covert 
of brushwood, or amidst a bower of sheltering 
herbage, not at any great distance from the 
water. Occasionally, however, other sites 
have been selected. 

When her nest is approached, the wild duck, 
like the lapwing, puts various artifices in 
practice in order to draw off the intruder: she 
flutters along as if lamed, pretends to escape 
seizure with difficulty, when having succeeded 
in her object, she rapidly leaves her astonished 
pursuer. On quitting her nest, during incu- 
bation, for a supply of food and water, she 
usually covers the eggs with down and dry 
herbage, no doubt in order to conceal them 
from observation, and, perhaps, also to pre- 
serve their temperature. They vary from ten 


* Mr. Selby regards it as an actual change of colour in 
the feathers, and not the result of a change of plumage or 
moult. 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Grove. 157 


to fourteen in number, and are of a bluish 
white colour. 

The food of the wild duck consists of grain 
and vegetable matters, slugs, aquatic insects, 
tadpoles, the fry of fishes, and other aliment. 
A large bony drum is placed at the lower 
portion of the windpipe of the male, (both 
. wild and tame,) just within the chest. 

The domestic duck exceeds the wild bird in 
size, but is neither so alert nor graceful, and 
domestication has deprived it of a large portion 
of its original instincts. Instead of pairing 
with one mate, the male, as may be seen, leads 
his troop of females, steering proudly at their 
head, but, unlike the gallant chanticleer, he 
neither defends them, nor calls them to par- 
take of any delicacy. The domestic duck 
varies considerably in size, and the colour of 
the plumage ; and many breeds are particularly 
noted. Among these is the large white 
Aylesbury breed, which is prevalent in Buck- 
inghamshire, where the rearing of ducks for 
the markets constitutes at least a part of the 
business of many cottagers. The Rhone duck, - 
another noted breed, is large, with a dark- 
coloured plumage, and celebrated for the good- 
ness and flavour of its flesh, 


158 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


The tame duck often lays more eggs than 
she can well cover during incubation, but she 
should never be allowed to sit on more than 
twelve or fourteen. It 1s a common practice 


to put duck eggs under common hens, nor do. 


the latter when the ducklings are hatched 
distinguish between them and their natural 
brood. The agitation of the poor hen when 
her web-footed charge betake themselves to 
the water, into which, instinct-guided, they 
fearlessly plunge, cannot have escaped the 
observation of every reader. That the hen 
should foster the ducklings she has hatched is 
not more strange than that the hedge-sparrow 
or wagtail should rear the young cuckoo, to 
the destruction of their own young; yet in 
some instances the hen distinguishes a strange 
nestling. Some years since we placed a nest- 
ling green linnet under a hen, brooding over 
her just hatched progeny: she at once rejected 
it with anger, and if not prevented would 
have killed it. Was this an accidental occur- 
rence, or would it always on trial occur? 
Though the young ducklings take early to 
the Water, it is better that they should gain a 
little strength before they be allowed to ven- 
ture into ponds or rivers; a shallow vessel of 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL GRour. 159 


water filled to the brim and sunk in the 
ground will suffice for the first week or ten 
days, and this rule is more especially to be 
adhered to when they are under the care of a 
common hen, which cannot follow them into the 
pond, and the calls of which when there they 
pay little or no regard to. Rats, weasels, pike, 
and eels, are formidable foes to ducklings ; 
we have known entire broods destroyed by the 
former, which having their burrows in a steep 
bank around a sequestered pond, it was found 
impossible to extirpate. Chickens which tra- 
verse the fields and farmyard, and are at all 
times more exposed to observation escape 
many dangers that assail ducklings. These 
accidents excepted, ducklings are easily reared ; 
they soon pick up worms, slugs, and insects, 
and may at first be fed on meal of any kind 
mixed with boiled potatoes crushed fine. In 
their selection of food they exhibit no fas- 
tidiousness, and require neither penning up 
nor craniming, to acquire plumpness. It has 
been well observed that they eat as if they 
considered it their duty to prepare themselves 
for the table, and give no trouble about it. 

To a kitchen-garden, in the autumn or 
summer, when they can do no mischief by 


160 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


devouring delicate salads and young sprouting 
vegetables, a troop of ducks does good service. 
They are industrious searchers of snails and 
slugs, wood-lce and millepedes, and gobble 
them up with great avidity. On snails and 
slugs they will get positively fat. 

Ducks—and the same observation applies to 
geese—should have their own exclusive dor- 
mitories. It is a bad plan to put them into 
the roosting place of fowls ; they should have 
their own chamber. In the gardens of the 
Zoological Society, the waterfowl have boxes, 
or wooden huts, placed around the margin of 
their pond, or on little islands in it. The plan 
answers excellently, but a wire fence forming 
an inclosure, so as to prevent the ingress of 
rats and weasels, is, in this case, necessary ; 
we do not, however, pretend to recommend the 
adoption of it under ordinary circumstances. 

There are few countries in which ducks are 
kept in such numbers as in China; they are 
there hatched by means of artificial incubation. 
Numerous possessors of great flocks of these 
birds keep them in boats on the Canton river, 
and turn them out at stated times along the 
barks to feed. They are singularly trained ; 
when their keeper wishes to call them into the 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 161 


boat, which communicates with the bank by 
means of a narrow board, he makes a signal 
eall, and all the ducks rush simultaneously 
forward; the first which gains the boat is 
ordinarily rewarded with a handful of rice, 
but the last undergoes a smart chastisement ; 
of this the birds from repetition are well aware, 
and hence, every one struggles to get before 
his neighbour, partly incited by hope, but more 
by fear. Of course, one must be the last, but 
it knows what awaits it. 

In Persia, the duck and goose’ are seldom 
kept, nor are these birds in any request for the 
table; in fact, it would seem that they are sel- 
dom eaten. 

Among the ancient Egyptians, ducks were 
in high request, and representations of these 
birds were favourite subjects for their paint- 
ings. We learn from Herodotus that salted 
ducks were eaten without any other cooking, 
and the mode of pickling them is seen in 
pictures from Thebes ; in one of these, two men 
are seen ‘‘ carrying the ducks on their shoul- 
ders, and a little further, a man putting them 
into earthern vessels, formed like Roman 
amphoree, probably containing salt or pickle. 
In the extreme left of the picture are two men 

P 


162 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS, 


seated, one of whom seems as if he were rub- 
bing something into a duck; one hand is 
closed, as it would be if it were full of salt, 
and with the other he is raising one of the 
wings apparently for the purpose of rubbing 
in the salt. The other figure appears to be 
plucking the feathers off the neck of a duck, but 
Roselini describes him as sprinkling a handful 
of salt upon it.” In the British Museum, 
among the provisions found in a tomb in Egypt, 
are two birds, of course very dry and shriyelled, 
which appear to us to be young ducks, or teal, 
or at least small water-fowl of some species. 

Whether ducks, geese, or other waterfowl 
were used as food by the ancient Hebrews, 
does not appear from any passage in the 
Scriptures. They do not seem to have been 
interdicted, and as the Hebrews must have 
witnessed the extensive consumption of these 
birds while sojourning in Egypt, especially 
ducks and geese, they may, perhaps, have 
adopted their use ; nevertheless, we suspect 
that, influenced by their feelings of aversion 
with respect to Hgyptian rites and ceremonies, 
the Hebrews may have regarded the duck and 
goose with the same disgust as they did the 
dog, which was a fayourite in Egypt, 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 163 


In modern Egypt and Syria, though wild 
water-fowl are abundant, still neither tame 
ducks nor geese are often to be seen, and the- 
same observation applies to other parts of 
western Asia. The reason is that the Moslems 
very rarely eat these birds, whether tame or 
wild, while on the contrary the common fowl 
is reared in vast abundance. 

We must not forget that in Europe, besides 
the ordinary tame duck, we have in our farm 
yards a very distinct species, namely, the musk, 
or as it is often erroneously called the Muscovy 
duck,* (Anas moschata.) It is the Canard 
musqué of Buffon, and deserves the title from 
the strong scent of musk which it exhales. 

This species will inter-breed with the com- 
mon duck, but we believe the progeny are 
not fertile. The musk duck greatly exceeds 
the ordinary kind in size, and, moreover, 
differs in the colours and character of the 
plumage, in general contour, and the form. 
of the head. The general colour is glossy 
blue-black, varied more or less with white ; 
the head is crested, and a space of naked 


* Ray says, ‘‘Muscovy duck, not because it comes from 
Muscovy, but because it exhales a somewhat powerful odour of 
musk ;” but surely the word might be better chosen, 


F2 


164 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


scarlet skin, more or less clouded with violet, 
surrounds the eye, continued from scarlet 
caruncles on the base of the beak ; the top of 
the head is crested ; the feathers of the body 
are larger, more lax, softer, and less closely 
compacted together than in the common duck, 
and seem to indicate less aquatic habits. The 
male far surpasses the female in size; there 
are no curled feathers in his tail. 

In habits, the musk-duck presents nothing 
very different from the other species, excepting 
that the male is fierce and quarrelsome ; when 
enraged, its eyes and demeanour betray its 
violent emotions, it depresses its head, and 
utters hoarse notes in a deep tone. The flesh 
of this species, and also of the mixed breed, is 
said to be very good, but we have never 
tasted it. 

With respect to the wild origin of the musk 
duck little seems to be definitely known, nor is 
it ascertained at what precise period it came 
into Europe. Most accounts refer to South 
America as its native country. Ray, in whose 
time it was known as a domestic bird in Eng- 
land, terms it 4nas sylvestris Braziliensis, the 
wood duck of Brazil. Linnzeus, in his Fauna 
Suecica, says, “It is reared on the farms of 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Grour. 165 


the gentry, but it is not an indigenous bird in ~ 
Sweden.” Marcgrave states the musk duck 
to be a native of Brazil and Guiana, and terms 
it Anas sylvestris, magnitudine anseris—a 
wood-duck of the size of a goose. 

Buffon says that these birds were introduced 
into France in the time of Belon, about 1540, 
who termed them Canes de Guinée. 

Tue Domestic Goosr.—The goose, like the 
duck, has been domesticated from time im- 
memorial ; but its wild origin appears to be 
clearly ascertained. We may commence the 
history of this species by observing, that four 
European species of wild goose, closely allied 
to each other, are known to naturalists ; 
namely,—the white-fronted goose,* (Anser 
erythropus—Fleming ; 4. albifrons—Bechst. ;) 
the bean goose, (Anser ferus — Flem.; A. 
segetum—Steph. ;) the pink-foot goose, (dn- 
ser pheenicopus—Bartlett, in Proc. (Zool. Soc. 
1839, p. 2;) and the grey-lag wild goose, 
(Anser palustris —Flem.; Anser cinereus, 
Meyer.) Of these, the first three are only 
periodical visitants to our island, and the 
temperate parts of Europe, and western Asia, 
arriving on the approach of winter, and retiring 


* This species is also a natiye of North America. 


166 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


to the high northern latitudes to breed on the 
return of spring. But the grey-lag wild goose, 
which is the origin of our domestic race, was 
once a permanent resident in our island, and 
bred in great numbers, in the fenny counties. 
From the causes alluded to in our notice of the 
wild duck, it is now entirely banished from its 
former haunts, and though a few small flocks 
visit our island during the winter, it is far 
more rarely to be met with, than either of the 
three preceding winter visitants. 

Though partially migratory, the gyrey-lag 
cannot be considered as a high northern bird, 
for, according to M. Temminck, it seldom 
advances much beyond the fifty-third degree of ~ 
north latitude, its geographical distribution 
extending over the central and eastern parts of 
Europe, northern Asia, and some parts of 
western Africa, where it haunts marshes, lakes, 
and the borders of inland seas. 

Mr. Gould, in his birds of Europe, says, 
“The grey-lag is known to inhabit all the 
extensive marshy districts, throughout the 
temperate portions of Europe generally, its 
range northward not extending beyond the 
fifty-third degree of latitude, while southwards 
it extends to the northern portions of Africa 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Grour. 167 


eastwardly to Persia, and, we believe, is gene- 
rally dispersed over Asia Minor.” 

The grey-lag exceeds the other species which 
we have alluded to, in size, and is sometimes 
found to weigh ten pounds; the general plu- 
mage is cinereous; the shoulders and rump, 
light grey; breast and belly, white, sometimes 
spotted with black; the bill, two and-a-half 
inches long ; more robust, deeper, broader, and 
the laminze much more developed than in the 
bean goose, and of a dull yellow, inclining to 
flesh colour towards the nail, which is white; 
in summer, the bill assumes a redder tint ; legs 
and feet, pale flesh colour; wings, when 
closed, even with the end of the tail. The 
young of this species are darker than the 
adults, but the grey upon the shoulders and 
rump, the form of the bill, and colour of the 
legs and feet, will always distinguish them 
from the young of any of the other species. 

The domestic goose is a bird of no little 
importance. It not only figures with accept- 
ance at the table, but its feathers are of great 
commercial value, and for the sake of them 
alone, thousands are kept in different counties, 
in order to meet, in some measure, the demands 
of the market, which nevertheless receives 


168 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


supplies from foreign parts. The feathers of 
the body properly dressed and sorted are in 
great demand, as all know, for beds, cushions, 
pillows, ete. The quill feathers furnish us with 
a simple instrument, efficient for good or for 
evil, as he in whose hands it is may use it. 

Among the ancient Britons, the goose, 
though probably kept in a tame state, was 
not eaten, as it would appear, from supersti- 
tious motives. On the occupation of this 
island by the Romans, these Druidical obsery- 
ances by degrees vanished, and we may well 
believe that when Britain became (with the 
exception of its extreme north) a Roman 
province, neither fowls, hares, nor geese 
were exempted from death by the hands of 
the obdurate cook, the ‘‘ sevus coquus,” as 
Martial calls him. 

Of the history of the goose in the Saxon 
era we can collect but little; even then, as 
it would seem, it was doomed to bleed at 
Michaelmas, and to the present day is Michael- 
mas a fatal time for geese. A roast goose upon 
the table on that day is a dish most undoubt- 
edly ‘more majorum.” Nor is the plucking 
of live geese (a custom perhaps of Roman 
introduction) of less antiquity, as their quill 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL GRouP. 169 


feathers, if pens were then but in small request, 
were in perpetual demand for arrows and 
cross-bow bolts. 

Though the domestic goose is very generally 
kept by farmers and cottagers throughout 
our island, yet, in particular counties, more 
attention is paid to the management of large 
flocks of these birds, with an express view to 
profit, than in others. Lincolnshire, for ex- 
ample, has been long celebrated for the multi- 
tudes of geese kept in the fenny districts. In 
Somersetshire, and also in some parts of Scot- 
land, they are reared in great numbers. In 
Lincolnshire, (in Pennant’s,) a single person 
frequently possessed a thousand adult geese, 
each of which on an average reared seven gos- 
lings, so that in the course of the season his 
stock amounted to eight thousand. The same 
observations will, more or less, apply to other 
parts of the country in the present day. In 
March, when the young geese are strong 
enough to travel, large flocks are driven by 
slow degrees from great distances to London, 
where they meet ready purchasers, great num- 
bers being brought up by professional feeders 
of poultry, who fatten them for the poulterer, 
or salesman, Oats, oatmeal, peas, milk, ete., 

F3 


170 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


constitute the fattening diet on which they are 
fed, and in a short time they are ready, as 
green geese, for the market ; and are in high 
request, though for ourselves we prefer a 
stubble-fed goose in autumn in good condition, 
but not (as too often is seen in the London 
poulterers’) overladen with oily fat. It is 
however, to the farmer, and not the great 
feeder of these birds, that we must look for a 
really stubble-fed goose at Michaelmas. 

The following extract from the Penny 
Cyclopzedia, will convey a good idea of the 
mode in which poultry are managed by the 
feeders for the London markets. 

‘Cleanliness, punctuality, and regularity 
prevail; the business is conducted as it were 
by machinery, rivalling the vibrations of the 
pendulum in uniformity of movement. The 
grand object of preparing not only geese, but 
poultry in general, for market, in as short a 
time as possible, is effected solely by paying 
unremitting attention to their wants,—in keep- 
ing them thoroughly clean, in supplying them 
with proper food, (dry, soft, and green, ) water, 
exercise-ground, ete. On arriving at the feeders, 
they are classed according to condition, ete. ; 
they soon become reconciled to their new 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 171 


abode and to each other. They are fed three 
times a day; and it is truly astonishing how 
soon they acquire the knowledge of the pre- 
cise time, marching from the exercise-ground 
to the pens, like soldiers, in close column. 
Goslings, or young geese, come to hand gene- 
rally about the month of March, after which a 
constant and regular supply arrives weekly 
throughout the season. At first, they are fed 
on soft meat, consisting of prime barley or 
oatmeal, afterwards on dry corn. An idea 
prevails with many, that any sort of corn will 
do for poultry, this is a grand mistake. Those 
who feed largely know better, and invariably 
make it a rule to buy the best. The Messrs. 
_ Boyce of Stratford, whose pens are capable of 
holding the extraordinary number of four 
thousand geese, independent of ducks, turkeys, 
ete., consume twenty coombs of oats daily, 
exclusive of other food.” Who, not acquainted 
with the great metropolis, would suspect that 
a commercial concern, such as. that noticed 
above, connected merely with the production 
of poultry for the markets, should exist, in- 
volving, as it must do, no small amount of 
capital and labour ?* 


® The following paragraph appeared in several of the papers. 


172 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Many small farmers and cottagers are in the 
habit of keeping flocks of geese on commons, 
and where the pasturage is not rendered bare 
by sheep, as is too often the case, the plan is 
advantageous ; but even when the pasturage is 
good, a supply of oats or barley, morning and 
evening, should be allowed. Where the pas- 
turage is bad, the old geese become thin and 
debilitated; and the young broods never 
thrive, and too often perish from want of 
sufficient nutriment. In such a plan of star- 
yation, arising either from neglect, or a sordid 
disposition, there is not only abominable 
cruelty, but a positive loss of profit. 

We are not among those who revolt at the 
quick, and therefore merciful, destruction of 
animals given to us by Almighty Providence 
as needful and salutary food; but we abhor 
barbarity. In old times, and also in modern 
days on the continent, a dreadful system of 
torturing geese has prevailed, with no other 
object than to produce a diseased enlargement 
of the liver, for the preparation of a dish, or 
rather pdté, said by epicures to be of exquisite 


Mr. Robert Fuller, a poulterer, of Boston, killed last week for 
the London Christmas market, 2400 geese, 1000 ducks, 500 
turkeys, which altogether weighed upwards of twenty tons.— 
Lincolnshire Chronicle,” December, 1845, 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 178 


flavour. This paté (pdté de foie gras) is in 
great request in France. The wretched geese 
are fastened, nailed by the feet to a board, 
placed before a hot fire, crammed with food, 
and supplied with drink. In this situation 
they pine, fever wastes away their flesh, but 
the liver becomes enormously swollen ; and this 
is the great desideratum.* Such it was also 
with the Roman epicures of ancient times. 
But a subject so repulsive need not detain us, 
yet, alas! we leave it but to notice a practice 
equally horrible, and we think but little less 
justifiable ; we allude to the plucking of live 
geese, practised in various places where these 
birds are kept for the profit, both of flesh and 
clothing, as sheep are by the grazier. Sheep, 
however, are mercifully sheared. 

According to Pennant, “geese are plucked 
five times in the year; the first plucking is at 
Lady-day, for feathers and quills, and the 
same is renewed four times more between that 
and Michaelmas for feathers only. The old 
geese quietly submit to the operation, but the 
young ones are very noisy and unruly. I once 


* Ducks are treated in a similar manner. Geese are reared in 
Languedoc and Alsace; ducks in Lower Normandy and Langue- 
doc. The duck’s liver-pies of Toulouse, and the goose-liver pies 
of Strasburg, are highly celebrated. 


174 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


saw this performed, and observed that goslings 
of six weeks old were not spared, for their 
tails were plucked, as I was told, to habituate 
them early to what they are to come to. If 
the season prove cold, numbers of the geese 
die by this barbarous custom. When the 
flocks are numerous, about ten pluckers are 
employed, each with a coarse apron up to his 
chin. Vast numbers of geese are driven annu- 
ally to London, to supply the markets ; among 
them are all the superannuated geese and 
ganders, which, by a long course of plucking, 
prove uncommonly tough and dry. ‘The fea- 
thers are a considerable article of commerce ; 
those from Somersetshire are esteemed the 
best, and those from Ireland the worst.”’ 
Times have greatly changed since Pennant 
wrote, and worthless geese find but little ac- 
ceptance in the London markets; but the 
system of plucking, which he describes as he 
saw it practised in Scotland, is still continued, 
and we believe on very nearly the same plan, 
in many places. The annual mortality among 
geese where this system prevails, as Lincoln- 
shire and Ireland, is very great, and the birds 
that live through several operations, become 
thin, feverish, and scarcely fit, or rather posi- 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL GRouP. 178 


tively unfit, to eat. The excuse for this bar- 
barity is that the feathers thus obtained are 
superior in elasticity to these plucked from 
the dead bird; besides which a live bird will 
constantly renew its plumage to undergo re- 
peated strippings, and thus bring increase of 
profit, without the necessary destruction of 
the sufferer. 

Both the feathers and quills of the goose 
have to undergo a certain preparation, in order 
to render them fit for the sale of the uphol- 
sterer or stationer. By various processes and 
by being subjected to heat, the vascular mem- 
brane adherent to the barrel, both: externally 
and internally, becomes dried up and shrivelled, 
and all fatty, or oleaginous matter is removed. 

The management of geese in ancient Italy 
appears to have differed but little from that 
practised in modern France and England; 
nor—though according to Livy, a flock of 
geese by their loud outcries saved the Roman 
capitol from the Gauls, when the watch dogs 
slept—did the Romans treat their geese very 
mercifully. It is true that annually, on the 
return of that memorable day, a silver goose 
was carried through the city in solemn pro- 
cession, and dogs were sacrificed, and that 


176 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


consecrated geese were kept in the temple of 
Juno, and were well lodged and fed, still 
swollen and diseased geese livers were in great 
request ; and geese were plucked alive, for their 
feathers were of as much use as in the present 
day; those of the white birds being especially 
valuable. In some places the plucking occurred 
twice in the year. Great numbers of geese were 
at certain seasons annually driven to Rome, 
and, according to Pliny, some came from almost 
incredible distances. ‘‘It is astonishing (he 
says) that these birds will travel on foot from 
the Morini* even to Rome. The tired ones 
are put first, and the rest, by a natural crowd- 
ing together, push them forward. The plu- 
mage of the white ones is an additional source 
of profit. They are plucked in some places 
twice a year, and soon recover their feathers. 
The down nearest the body is the softest, that 
from Germany the most esteemed. There the 
white ones, of inferior size, are called ganza, 
(modern German, gans, a goose ; gaas, Danish; 
gas, Swedish ; gander, English for the male.)+ 
Their feathers fetch five denarii a pound.” 


* The Morini were a people of ancient Belgic Gaul, inhabiting 
the territory around modern Calais, the Pays de Calais. 

t The gander is usually white, and though longer in the body 
appears to be less bulky than the female. 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 177 


In some parts of modern Italy, the goose is 
in little request for the table, though the sys- 
tem of plucking off its feathers while alive, 
is still continued. 

In ancient Egypt, both the common and a 
distinct species, the Egyptian goose, or Vul- 
panser, (Chenalopex Algyptiacus,) were kept 
tame and reared in vast numbers, as frequent 
paintings and sculptured representations of 
these birds attest. Herodotus says, that the 
Chenalopex* was sacred in Egypt. But the 
author of Egyptian Antiquities, observing that 
it is of frequent occurrence on the sculptures, 
does not consider it to have been a sacred bird; | 
“unless (he adds) it may have some claim to 
that honour from having been a favourite arti- 
cle of food for the priests.” A place in Upper 
Egypt had its name Chenoboscion, or Cheno- 
boscia, goose-pens, from these animals being 
fed there, probably for sale, though these may 
have been sacred geese; for we are told that the 
goose was a bird under the care of Isis. 

The Chenalopex, or Egyptian goose, is abun- 
dant in a wild state, along the banks of the Nile, 
and is distributed over the whole of Africa; 


* This word means fox-goose, a name given in allusion to 
the bird’s cunning. 


178 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


occasionally it visits the southern parts of the 
European continent, and is not unfrequent 
in Sicily. In England it is kept as an orna- 
ment to sheets of water in parks and pleasure 
grounds, where it breeds freely ; hence it hap- 
pens that half-wild individuals which have 
escaped from their inclosure, are occasionally, 
sometimes even frequently, shot, leading those 
not acquainted with the bird, to take it for 
a British species. Its colouring is very beau- 
tiful, and its pace on the ground far more easy 
and graceful than that of the common goose. 
Two species of geese, besides the ordinary 
goose, are often seen domesticated in our 
island; these are the Canada goose, (anser 
Canadensis,) and the Chinese goose, (anser 
Cygnoides.) ‘The Canada goose is the ordinary 
wild goose of the middle and boreal regions of 
North America; andis a migratory bird, breed- 
ing in the higher latitudes, within the arctic 
circle ; whence, on the approach of winter, vast 
flocks wing their way southwards, where every 
means for their destruction are in active opera- 
tion. In the fur countries, their appearance on 
their northward return in the spring, is hailed 
with joy; for it is upon the flesh of this bird, 
that the natives of the woody and swampy 


THE SWIMMING, OF NATATORIAL GRouP. 179 


districts chiefly depend for their sustenance 
during the summer. About three weeks 
after their first appearance, the Canada geese 
disperse in pairs throughout the country, 
between the fiftieth and sixty-seventh paral- 
lels to breed, retiring at the same time 
from the shores of Hudson’s Bay. They are 
seldom or never seen on the coasts of the 
arctic sea; in July, after the young birds 
are hatched, the parents moult, and vast num- 
bers are killed in the rivers and small lakes, 
when they are unable to fly. When chased 
by a canoe, and obliged to dive frequently, 
“they soon become fatigued, and make for the 
shore with the intention of hiding themselves, 
but as they are not fleet they fall an easy prey 
to their pursuers. In autumn they again 
assemble in flocks on the shores of Hudson’s 
Bay for three weeks or a month previous to 
their departure southward.” In the territories 
of the Hudson’s Bay Company, these birds 
are barrelled for use, and the feathers are im- 
ported into England. Those taken on the 
approach of the cold season, during their 
southward migration, in Canada, and within 
the states, are frozen in their feathers, and 
preserved for winter consumption. 


180 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


Though the ordinary European tame goose 
is kept in North America, the Canada goose 
is also kept there as a domestic bird, and is 
said to thrive better than the former. In 
France and England it has also become 
domiciled, and interbreeds with the common 
goose; the hybrids are highly esteemed for 
the very superior flavour and delicacy of their 
flesh. Bewick observes that the Canada 
goose, now one of our domestic birds, “is as 
familiar, breeds as freely, and is in every 
respect as valuable as the common goose.” 
It is said to be extremely watchful, and more 
sensible of approaching changes in the atmo- 
sphere than our ordinary species. 

The Chinese goose or swan goose (anser 
Cygnoides) in its general form, the length of 
its neck, and the protuberance at the base of 
its beak, reminds us of the swan, and appears 
to take an intermediate station between the 
geese and swan tribes. It rather exceeds the 
ordinary goose in size, and freely breeds with 
it, so that the pure race is less frequently to 
be seen than formerly, at least the mixed breed 
has more frequently come under our notice. 
The Chinese goose is originally from China 
and other parts of Asia, and also from Africa. 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 181 


It is the Oie de Guinée of Buffon. Individuals 
are sometimes to be met with almost purely 
white, with a brown mark down the back of 
the neck. Asan ornament of ponds and lakes, 
in pleasure grounds, these birds are little in- 
ferior to the swan, and it is chiefly for this 
purpose that they are kept. We have, how- 
ever, seen them, and particularly the mixed 
breed, in farm yards. 

Tue Tame Swan, on Mute Swan.—The 
tame swan (cygnus olor) may perhaps come 
within the list of domestic birds, for though 
it lives and breeds at large on our rivers and 
sheets of water, it is not an indigenous species, 
in our island, nor is it one of owr migratory 
visitors. Moreover, it is in all cases under 
ownership, and guarded by express laws 
relative to its preservation. It is, in fact, a 
‘bird royal,” in which no subject can have 
property, so long as it is on a public river or 
creek, except by an express grant. 

The preseht species, in a wild condition, is a 
native of Siberia, north-eastern Europe, and 
the adjacent parts of Asia, migrating south- 
wards in winter, when it occasionally visits 
Italy. On the Caspian Sea, through Asia 
Minor, Mesopotamia, and Syria, it is abundant 


182 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


in winter; and swans unnumbered, as in the 
time of Homer, may still visit Cayster’s* 
springs, and there “stretch their long necks 
and flap their rustling wings.” 

At what period the swan became reclaimed 
and naturalized in western Europe and the 
British Isles, we have no means of ascer- 
taining, certainly it was at a remote date ; and 
as the laws we have alluded to prove, this 
noble bird was held in peculiar esteem. From 
a digest of the British statutes relative to the 
swan in the Penny Cyclopedia, we take a few 
extracts, to show their general tendency. The 
crown alone has the right of granting a pro- 
perty in swans on a public river, and con- 
ceding this privilege a swan-mark is also 
granted, for distinguishing the particular 
“game” or flock of swans, from others on 
the same river. Sometimes the crown, instead 
of granting a swan-mark, confers the still 
further prerogative right of seizing within a 
certain district all white or adult swans not 
marked. “Thus the abbot of Abbotsbury, in 
Dorsetshire, had a game of wild swans in the 
estuary formed by the isle of Portland and the 
Chesil Bank. The swannery at Abbotsbury 


* A river in Asia Minor near Ephesus. 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL GRouP. 183 


is the largest in the kingdom, and though 
formerly much more extensive, it still numbers 
many hundreds of these birds, forming an 
object of considerable attraction and interest 
to those who visit this part of the coast. It 
is now vested in the earl of Ilchester, to whose 
ancestor it was granted on the dissolution of 
the monasteries.” 

The city of Oxford has a game of swans by 
prescription, but we do not know that any 
are now kept. 

On the Thames, the Dyers’ and Vintners’ 
Company, with the crown, divide the games 
of swans between them. The royal mark on 
the beak is made on the skin of the upper 
mandible with a knife. 

The Dyers’ Company have the. swan- santie 
consisting of a single notch or nick on one 
side of the beak; that of the Vintners’ Com- 
pany consists of a mark on each side of the 
beak. Hence the sign of the swan with two 
nicks, converted in the present day into two 
necks. 

The adult male swan is called a cob, the 
adult female a pen, the young a cygnet. 
The cygnets when hatched are clothed with 
brownish gray down, and do not acquire 


184 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


the white plumage in its perfect purity 
till the beginning of the third year. The 
female sits upon five, six, or eight eggs, and 
during the season of incubation, is sedulously 
attended by her mate, who, however, gentle 
and inoffensive at other times, becomes now 
furious if any one approach the breeding 
place, and advances with raised up plumes, 
and every demonstration of excitement, to the 
attack ; nor is the assault of so large and 
powerful a bird, a trifling affair. A blow with 
its wing would be likely to inflict a severe 
injury. 

In former times the swan was in high 
repute, and was to be found on the tables of 
the great, and no banquet of ceremony or 
state dinner was accounted complete, if swans 
were not included in the costly bill of fare. 

The swan feeds on grain, various aquatic 
plants, and the herbage along the sides of lakes 
and rivers ; it soon becomes very familiar, 

The common tame swan is very long lived. 
Its windpipe is simple without any flexure. 

Closely allied to the tame swan, or cygnus 
olor, and formerly confounded with it, is a 
species called by dealers the Polish swan. It 
is the Cygnus immutabilis of Mr, Yarrell, who 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 185 


first pointed out its differential characters. In 
this species, the black tubercle at the base of 
the beak is small even in old males: the legs, 
the toes, and intervening webs are slate gray. 
The cygnets are of as pure a white as the 
adults, and consequently undergo no change 
of colouring. The windpipe is simple as in 
the tame swan; there are, however, many very 
marked differences in the osteological structure 
of the two birds, which have been pointed out 
by W. G. Pelerin, esq., in the Magazine of 
Nat. Hist. 1839, p. 179. 

The Polish swan is a native of the north of 
Europe and the borders of the Baltic, and 
occasionally visits our island, sometimes even 
in considerable numbers. Young individuals 
when captured readily become tamed, and 
breed freely on sheets of water. 

Of the other wild swans of Europe and 
Asia, we may enumerate the hooper, or 
whistling swan, (cygnus ferus—Ray ; cygnus 
musicus—Bechstein. ) 

This species is spread throughout the whole 
northern range of Europe and Asia, breeding 
in the high northern latitudes, (occasionally in 
the Shetland and Orkney isles,) and migrating 
southwards in winter, even to the shores of 


186 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


northern Africa. It visits our island, some- 
times in considerable flocks, and their wild 
“hooping” note, when heard from a con- 
siderable elevation, as they make their way in 
the figure of a wedge, through “the cold 
thin atmosphere,” is by no means unmusical. 
The ancient poets fabled the swan as uttering 
a mournfully musical prelude to its death. 
Perhaps this idea arose from their having 
heard the mingled voices of vast flocks of this 
species, as they winged their way to the rivers 
and lakes of Asia Minor. 

These notes are produced by a_ peculiar 
conformation of the tube of the windpipe, 
which, before entering the chest, makes a long 
loop, which is received into a cavity hollowed 
out in the keel of the breastbone throughout 
its whole length. 

The hooper will breed in captivity. Several 
specimens are living in the gardens of the 
Zoological Society. 

The down and feathers of the hooper are 
very valuable, and consequently the bird is 
killed in great numbers, in Iceland, for the 
sake of these products, which are not only 
used by themselves for various purposes, but 
exchanged in barter. In August, when the 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 187 


old birds have moulted their quill feathers, and 
are unable to fly, swan hunting commences. 
Many are ridden down by men mounted on 
smal) hardy horses, accustomed to swamps 
and bogs, which other horses would be unable 
to traverse; but most are killed by dogs, which 
are trained to seize them by the neck, and 
thus quickly despatch and secure them. Swan 
hunting in Iceland is a scene of bustle, anima- 
tion, and excitement, and the more so as the 
interests of the natives are concerned in the 
success of this singular chase. 

Bewicx’s Swan, (Cygnus Bewickii—Yar- 
rell,) a species first distinguished by Mr. 
Yarrell, is smaller than the hooper, and differs 
besides in the structure of the windpipe, the 
great loop of which not only passes into the 
keel of the breastbone, which it traverses, but 
also passes into a cavity of the flat portion of 
the breastbone itself, where before being re- 
flected back it takes a considerable curve, and 
then returns upon the trough of the keel. The 
beak also exhibits some differences. 

The cygnus Bewickii is a native of the high 
northern regions of Europe and America, and 
probably also of Asia. It is only during 
severe winters that flocks of this species visit 


188 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


our island. According to Mr. Blackwall, the 
call note of Bewick’s swan, while on the wing, 
is loud and clamorous. 

Turning to North America, besides Bewick’s 
swan, the hooper, according to most natural- 
ists, exists in the northern districts. But the 
prince of Canino, in his ‘‘ Birds of Europe 
and North America,’ regards the species _ 
usually considered as identical with the hooper 
to be distinct, and registers it as the cygnus 
Americanus of Sharpless. How far he is cor- 
rect is yet a question. There is, however, a 
definite species, the trumpeter swan, (cygnus 
buccinator,) undoubtedly peculiar to North 
America, and which is the common swan of 
the fur countries, whence its skins are im- 
ported in great numbers into England. It is 
the species that furnishes the principal part 
of the swan’s down of commerce, and also 
swan quills. 

The breeding places of the trumpeter swan 
are chiefly within the arctic circle, whence it 
migrates southwards on the approach of winter, 
preceding the flocks of wild geese. The fold 
of the windpipe in this species difiers from 
that both of the hooper and Bewick’s swan. 

Of the black swan of Australia, and the 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Group. 189 


black-necked swan of Chili, we shall say 
nothing ; indeed, our notice of the wild swans 
of the northern hemisphere is intended rather 
to give a list of the species allied more or less 
to the tame or mute swan, than to enter into 
the minutiz of their history. 

Here, then, we may close our account of the 
birds legitimately coming under the head of 
domestic poultry. A few words may be per- 
mitted on another subject. We commenced 
the work with a reference to the early history 
of man, and endeavoured to show from several 
facts, and among others, from his availing 
himself, even at the outset of his career of 
labour, of the services of such animals as would 
assist him by their docility, strength, or in- 
telligence, or supply him with food and cloth- 
ing, that a savage condition is alien to his 
nature. This is emphatically declared by Scrip- 
ture. ‘‘God created man in his own image,” 
and though that image is defaced, it is not 
obliterated ; nor has he lost that ‘dominion 
over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of 
the air, and over every living thing that 
moveth upon the earth,” with which the Cre- 
ator invested him. ‘This dominion consists 
not only in superiority, connected with the 


190 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


possession of intellect, of reason, but arises 
also from the total difference as to the end and 
aim of his creation—his future destiny and 
condition. He is destined for immortality, 
he is gifted with reason—a knowledge of good 
and evil, and language in which to express his 
ideas, and worship the Giver of every good and 
perfect gift. When we contemplate man in’ 
this light, we cannot but see his position in 
creation; but he holds another position,—a 
position before his God who is his Creator, and 
will be his Judge. Is this position one of 
perfect innocence and holiness? No! Man 
fell from his first estate and lost that position, 
and the human race now stands before God, 
as guilty, as criminal, as condemned by the 
law, to break one tittle of whichis to break the 
whole. Manis amenable to punishment ; and 
is there means of escape? Yes, he can escape, 
for the door of mercy is not closed ; nay, he is 
invited to flee for refuge from the wrath to 
come, and so plain is the path, that the wayfar- 
ing man cannoterrtherein. It is through the 
atonement made by our Lerd Jesus Christ, 
who “bore our sins im his own body on the 
tree,” when he in whom the fulness of the 
Godhead dwelt bodily, was crucified, offering 


a 


THE SWIMMING, OR NATATORIAL Grour. 191 


up himself as a sacrifice for the guilt of the 
world ;—‘‘he was wounded for our transgres- 
sions, he was bruised for our iniquities: the 
chastisement of our peace was upon him; and 
by his stripes we are healed. The Lord has laid 
on him the iniquity of us all,” Isa. liii. 5, 6. 
It is through faith in the great atonement 
which Jesus made when he gave up his life as 
a ransom for sinners, that man can escape 
the judgment of God. This faith must be a 
lively principle implanted in him by the holy 
Spirit, which God has promised to those who 
ask in true sincerity. (See Luke xi. 13.) 
“‘There is therefore now no condemnation to 
them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not 
after the flesh, but after the Spirit.” Rom. vii. 1. 

It was on this atonement, promised to Adam, 
after his fall, that the prophets and holy men 
of old depended,—but they saw as through a 
glass, darkly. To us a purer light is given, a 
bright revelation full of hope and joy is made, 
and while it humbles our pride, or self-suffi- 
ciency, and shows us our guilt, it offers us 
pardon and peace, and the bliss of heaven, 
where the Redeemer, once rejected by men, 
sits on a throne of glory. 

How transeendently joyful are the pros 


192 OUR DOMESTIC FOWLS. 


pects of the Christian! But all are not 
Christians even among those who claim to be 
so accounted, and whole nations are involved 
in worse than Egyptian darkness,—the dark- 
ness of the soul. Yet the day will come, in 
which all nations shall be brought to the 
knowledge of the truth, for to the Messiah is 
promised the heathen for an inheritance, and 
the uttermost parts of the earth for a posses- 
sion. (Psalm ii. 8.) Such, then, is the exalt- 
ation upon earth, to which the Divine decree 
has. appointed the human race. Even now 
the day is brightening; Christianity can 
number among its sincere professors men of 
every clime, from the ice-bound north, to the 
sunny isles of the southern seas; the skin- 
clad Greenlander, familiar with the waves ; 
the hardy Russ and Sclavonian; the Anglo, 
the Frank, the Hindoo, the Negro, the red 
rover of the American forest, and the fierce 
Polynesian, once an idolater and a cannibal. 
Surely Providence is bringing the great work 
to pass, when wars, and cruelty, and oppression 
shall cease, and ‘‘the knowledge of the Lord 
shall cover the earth as the waters cover the 
sea.” 


THE RELIGIOUS TRACT SOCIETY; INSTITUTED 1799, 


alte ys fag 
; \ C7 


cn Sane 
y 


PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE 
CARDS OR SLIPS FROM THIS POCKET 


UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO LIBRARY 


F Martin, William Charles 
82 Linnaeus 
3 Our domestic fowls