Skip to main content

Full text of "Position of parties and abuses of power. Speech of Hon. Reuben E. Fenton, of New York. Delivered in the House of Representatives, February 16, 1860"

See other formats


X 


POSITION  OF  PARTIES  AND  ABUSES  OF  POWER, 


SPEECH 

OF 

HON.    REUBEN    E.    FENTON, 


OF     NEW     YORK. 


Delivered  in  the  Hcmse  of  Representatives,  February  16,  1860. 


Mr.  FENTON  obtained  the  floor. 

Mr.  MAYNAKD.  Will  the  gentleman  from 
New  York  yield  to  a  motion  for  the  Committee 
to  rise? 

Mr.  FENTON.  I  prefer  to  speak  now.  It 
seems  most  proper  to  reply  at  this  time  to  the 
gentleman  from  Missouri,  [Mr.  Anderson,]  who 
has  just  concluded. 

Mr.  ELY.  I  hope  my  colleague  will  be  per- 
mitted to  proceed. 

Mr.  FENTON.  Mr.  Chairman,  I  had  very  little 
right,  and  less  desire,  to  engage  in  a  discussion 
of  the  politics  of  the  country  prior  to  the  organ- 
ization of  the  House.  The  purpose  of  m 
and  those  with  whom  I  acted,  during  the  eight 
weeks'  contest,  was  first  to  organize,  provide  for 
the  creditors  of  the  Government — some  of  whom 
were  on  the  verge  of  bankruptcy — and  dispatch 
the  public  business  ;  and  while  thus,  out  of  re- 
gard for  the  public  good,  and  in  submission  to 
parliamentary  propriety,  for  other  purposes,  we 
were  manacled,  handcuffed,  and  tongue-tied, 
gentlemen  on  the  other  side  of  this  Hall  made 
onset  with  violent  disunion  and  secession  speech- 
es, and  with  daily  perversions  of  our  principles 
and  motives.  Our  object  was  peace  aud  frater- 
nal feeling;  and  we  were  opposed  by  disorder, 
acrimony,  and  menace. 

I  would  not  complain  alone  of  disunion  blus- 
ter, since  what  has  been  perhaps  must  be ;  and 
since,  moreover,  it  has  become  almost  as  neces- 
sary to  the  country,  from  early  introduction  and 
periodical  use  down  through  our  history,  as  the 
blight  and  frost  of  the  season,  or  the  yearly 
circuit  of  the  menagerie. 

At  one  time,  the  Union  was  to  be  destroyed 
by  the  right  of  search  ;  at  another,  by  the  United 
States  Bank;  then  again  by  the  tariff;  by  the 
election  of  Fremont  in  185G ;  and  finally  its 
doom  was  irrevocably  sealed  the  other  day.  by 
the  late  John  Brown,  and  Helper's  Impending 
Crisis.  It  is  not  this  that  calls  for  reply,  and  it 
is  not  to  this  I  speak,  but  to  repel  unjust  and 
unfounded  assaults  upon  my  constituents  and 
my  party;  and  to  vindicate,  as  well  as  1  can, 
my  country  and  its  history.  I  blush  with  indig- 
nation at  the  misrepresentations  and  perversions 
which  gentlemen  on  the  other  side  of  this  Hall 
have  indulged  in  ;  and  did  I  not  reflect  that  un- 
fairness and  wrong  on  the  part  of  intelligent 
men  are  the  expedient  of  conscious  weakness 
and  error,  I  should  suppose  they  had  been  touch- 


ed as  with  the  spear  of  Ithuriel,  which  made 
them  start  forth  into  the  deformity  tevealed  du- 
ring this  controversy. 

The  gentleman  from  Alabama  [Mr.  Curry] 
endeavored,  in  his  usual  aide  and  ingenious 
manner,  to  place  this  controversy  on  vantage 
grounds  from!  philosophical  and  logical  deduc- 
tions, disclaiming,  however,  the  desire,  and  dis- 
carding the  attempt  of  his  associates,  to  hold 
the  Republican  party  responsible  for  the  acts  or 
excesses  of  individuals,  or  as  affording  evidence 
of  the  position  and  principles  of  our  party. 

But  he  asserts  that  a  great  change  upon  the 
subject  of  slavery  has  "  come  o'er  the  spirit  of 
our  dream  ;  "  that  the  cloud,  which  was  no  bigger 
than  a  man's  hand,  now  covers  the  whole  North- 
ern horizon  ;  and  that  our  people  have  really, 
within  the  last  few  years,  become  an  intensely 
anti-slavery  people,  with  aims  at  once  aggressive 
and  alarming  to  the  safety  of  the  South — the 
logical  result  of  all  which  is  the  ultimate  ex- 
tinction of  their  favorite  institution.  If  the  ba- 
sis of  his  argument  be  correct,  possibly  the  result 
indicated  would  follow  ;  in  this  instance,  how- 
ever, I  must  think  the  honorable  gentleman  has 
been  singularly  infelicitous  in  his  statement  in 
respect  to  public  sentiment  and  his  study  of  po- 
litical history.  May  be  he  prefers  for  himself 
and  his  friends  to  "  repose  in  the  vagueness  of  a 
fallacy,  rather  than  to  be  tormented  wjth  the 
precision  of  a  logical  definition. 

The  sentiment  of  the  North  upon  this  question 
has  undergone  no  change  ;  it  is  the  same  now, 
with  a  few  exceptions  of  extreme  ultraism  for  and 
against  slavery,  that  it  was  in  the  earlier  and 
better  days  of  the  Republic.  The  people  of  the 
North,  at  an  early  day,  believed,  with  all  your 
early  statesmen,  that  slavery  was  a  political,  mor- 
al, and  social  evil,  and  in  time  they  rid  them- 
selves of  it,  in  harmony  with  their  better  con- 
victions of  duty.  But  it  is  true,  that  not  until 
recently  has  this  great  and  fixed  anti-slavery 
sentiment,  ever  existing  with  the  Northern  masses, 
found  it  important,  yea,  necessary,  to  take  the 
form  of  political  organization.  But  a  few  years 
since,  the  men  who  now  make  up  this  great  Re- 
publican party  were  mainly  classified  as  'Whigs 
and  .Democrats;  and  were  they  not  then,  as  ?ioto, 
moved  by  the  same  hatred  of  this  curse  to  free 
labor  and  to  free  men,  and  by  the  same  deep- 
seated  opposition  to  its  extension  over  the  free 
soil  of  this  continent?     Look  over  the  record  of 


public  men  and  public  bodies,  and  there  see  the 
almost  universal  testimony  ;  see,  still  farther  in 
the  retrospect,  that  your  fathers  and  our  fathers 
proclaimed  that  men  were  created  with  equal, 
natural  rights,  and  that  the  enslavement  of  man, 
of  whatever  color,  was  an  invasion  of  these  nat- 
ural rights,  and  a  violation  of  the  spirit  and 
genius  of  our  free  institutions.  They  held  it  to 
be  an  opprobrium  to  civilization  ;  hence  they 
sought  to  circumscribe  it — to  preserve  soil  then 
free,  forever  free,  from  its  dark  and  blighting 
tread.  They  pushed  it  aside,  with  all  possible 
haste,  from  a  majority  of  the  original  thirteen 
States  ;  they  provided,  as  was  supposed,  for  its 
gradual  decay,  by  cutting  off  the  foreign  supply  ; 
and  in  every  way  they  sought  to  build  up  and 
around  it  a  cordon  of  free  territory,  and  free 
States,  and  free  sentiment,  that  should  exhale 
an  atmosphere  of  liberty  that  slavery  must 
breathe  or  die.  And  do  gentlemen  ask,  why, 
therefore,  this  Republican  party  is  commissioned 
with  these  great  and  sacred  purposes  of  the 
founders  of  the  Republic  ?  I  will  tell  them  why. 
It  is  because  they  have  violated  these  first  cove- 
nants ;  because  they  have  mocked  at  the  faith 
of  the  fathers  ;  because  they  have  sought  to 
desecrate  the  rightful  heritage  of  free  labor.  It 
was  not  until  after  all  this,  and  not  until  they 
had  taken  possession  of  a  great  party,  and  turn- 
ed it  into  an  instrument  of  aggression,  a  sort  of 
Zouave  force,  ready  and  eager  for  work  of  car- 
nage and  slaughter,  that  this  Northern  fixed  and 
unyielding  sentiment  clothed  itself  with  the  pre- 
rogatives of  organization. 

No,  Mr.  Chairman,  it  was  not  until  after  Texas 
had  been  annexed  for  the  concealed  purpose  of 
extending  slavery  at  the  hazard  of  its  pendant,  a 
war  with  Mexico  ;  not  until  after  a  law  had  been 
forced  upon  the  North  for  the  recapture  of  their 
fugitive  slaves,  odious  in  its  details,  repulsive  in 
its  main  features  to  the  enlightened  judgment  of 
our  people,  and  violative  of  the  rights  of  man  in 
a  trial  for  his  liberty  ;  and  not  until,  still  further 
on,  this  controlling  interest  in  the  affairs  of  the 
Government,  this  sapping  and  mining  power,  had, 
in  exultant  joy,  destroyed  the  restriction  against 
slavery  north  of  36°  30'  north  latitude,  and  upon 
that  soil,  once  musical  with  the  notes  of  freedom, 
revelled  in  despotic  triumph  upon  the  rights,  the 
traditions,  the  franchises,  and  the  dearest  interests 
of  our  people,  prostituting  the  ballot-box,  driving 
from  the  polls  rightful  citizens,  following  by  day 
and  murdering  by  night  men  whose  only  crime 
was  the  uttering  of  sentiments  which  they  had 
drank  in  among  the  hills  and  valleys  of  their 
former  homes  in  the  free  North.  We  could  wait 
no  longer ;  it  would  not  do  to  wait  until  the  slave 
power  had  so  interwoven  itself  into  the  very  web 
of  o.ir  political  fabric  that  the  integrity  of  our 
institutions  was  fatally  imperilled. 

The  people  of  the  North  were  reluctant  to  break 
away  from  their  ancient  party  associations  :  for  a 
long  time  alter  the  South  had  wantonly  sported 
with  their  rights,  they  reposed  in  the  confidence 
of  returning  justice  and  the  security  of  their 
pledges.  But  when  at  last  these  fond  hopes 
were  dispelled  in  their  tearing  the  diadem  from 
the  biow  of  freedom  in  the  northern  half  of  the 


old  Louisiana  purchase,  the  people  of  the  North, 
from  necessity,  in  vindication  and  maintenance 
of  their  principles  and  the  principles  of  their 
ancestors,  sprang  at  one  bound  into  this  organi- 
zation, which,  like  a  mighty  army,  swept  along, 
extending  its  column  from  the  early  and  con- 
stant home  of  freedom  in  the  East  to  the  scatter- 
ed settlements  of  free  labor  beyond  the  Missis- 
sippi, until  it  now  embraces  in  its  conquest  fifteen 
States  of  this  Union.  And  I  am  not  surprised 
that  gentlemen  of  the  South  tremble  and  take 
alarm ;  they  hear  the  tread  of  these  millions  of 
freemen  ;  it  is  a  mighty  army  marching  on  to 
take  possession  of  the  Government,  well  officer- 
ed and  fully  equipped,  and  with  weapons,  mu- 
nitions, and  supplies,  more  complete  and  more 
potent  than  the  army  of  Hannibal  or  Napoleon, 
or  the  brave  followers  of  Jackson  when  he  struck 
the  decisive  blow  against  British  arrogance  and 
aggression  at  New  Orleans  ;  inasmuch  as  the 
ballot-box,  the  free  press,  and  free  speech,  in  the 
cause  of  truth  and  justice,  are  more  mighty  in 
battle  and  more  powerful  in  conquest  than  the 
sword. 

Southern  gentlemen  have  no  right  to  complain 
of  the  numbers  and  might  and  objects  of  the 
Republican  party,  nor  from  these  to  accuse  the 
people  of  the  North  of  a  change  of  sentiment 
upon  the  question  of  slavery.  The  history  of 
this  contest,  made  up  from  their  own  record, 
through  the  past  twenty-five  years,  has  been 
conducting  the  mind  of  patriotic  citizens,  of 
whatever  party,  all  over  the  North,  to  the  neces- 
sity of  organization  to  preserve  the  principles  of 
justice  and  liberty.  It  is  not  our  people,  but  the 
people  of  the  South — you,  gentlemen — who  have 
changed  from  the  declared  opinions  and  pur- 
poses of  the  founders.  When  the  declaration  of 
our  rights  was  proclaimed,  and  the  proclamation 
of  our  liberties  and  those  rights  which  belonged 
to  all,  there  existed  among  us  an  institution  in- 
consistent with  its  great  truths,  and  with  the 
form  and  spirit  of  the  Government  which  was 
framed.  All  the  leading  men  of  that  day,  and 
subsequently  through  a  large  period  of  our  his- 
tory, believed  it  to  be  not  only  anomalous  to 
our  institutions,  but  a  deplorable  evil;  and  they 
sought  by  every  means  to  eradicate  it.  I  will  be 
indulged  by  gentlemen  in  calling  attention  to 
some  of  their  ever-memorable  sayings;  for  their 
testimony  fortifies  and  sustains  my  proposition, 
and  at  the  same  time  places  in  more  vivid  con- 
trast these  daily  oblations  of  our  Southern  breth- 
ren at  the  shrine  of  human  bondage. 

Previous  to  the  Revolution,  while  the  nation 
was  taking  counsel*  and  preparing  for  the  strug- 
gle of  liberty  against  despotism,  the  people  gen- 
erally "  were  struck  with  the  inconsistency  of  an 
appeal  for  their  own  liberties,  while  holding  in 
bondage  their  fellow-men,  guilty  only  of  a  skin 
not  colored  like  their  own."  The  people  of  Dan- 
bury,  Connecticut,  in  town  meeting,  agreed  to  im- 
port no  more  slaves  ;  at  the  same  time  declaring, 
"  we  cannot  but  think  it  a  palpable  absurdity  so 
loudly  to  complain  of  attempts  to  enslave  us, 
while  we  are  actually  enslaving  others." 

In  Darien,  Georgia,  in  1775,  the  following  reso- 
lution was  passed  at  a  meeting  of  citizens : 


"To  show  tho  world  that  we  are  not  influenced  by  any 
contracted  or  interested  motives,  but  by  a  general  philan- 
thro  ij  for  all  mankind,  of  whatever  climife,  language,  or 
wo  hereby  declare  our  disapprobation  and  ab- 
horrence ol  the  unnatural  practice  of  slavery  as  (however 
tho  an  ■  of  the  countrj  or  other  speciou 

ments  maj  plead  for  it)  a  practice  founded  in  injustice  and 
cruelty,  and  highly  dangerous  to  our  liberties  as  well  as 
lives,  deba  ;  part  of  our  fellow-creatures  below  men,  and 
corrupting  the  \  irtue  and  morals  of  tho  rest." 

Listen  to  Jefferson,  in  the  Virginia  Convention 
of  1774: 

-■  The  abolition  c  slavery  is  tho  greatest  object  ol 

desire  in  th  so  colonies,  where  it  was  unhappily  introduced 

in  their  infant  state." 

Again,  in  the  Declaration  of  Independence  : 

"  That  all  men  are  created  equal;  that  they  are  endowed 
with  cenar  i  unalienable  rights;  thatamong  these  are  life, 
liberty,  and  the  pursuit  of  happiness. " 

Again,  in  1821,  when  urging  a  proposition  upon 
his  native  State,  he  says : 

"Nothing  is  more  certainly  written  in  tho  book  of  fate, 
than  that  I  11  se  p  lople  [the  negroes]  are  to  be  free  ;  nor  is  it 
that  the  two  races,  equally  free,  cannot  live  in 
the  same  Government.  Nature,  habit, opinion,  have  drawn 
indelible  lines  of  distinction  between  them.  It  is  still  in  our 
power  to  direct  the  process  of  emancipation  and  deportation, 
and  in  such  slow  degree  as  that  the  evil  will  wear  oft 
sibly,  and  their  plaee  be,  pari  passu,  filled  up  by  free  white 
lab  :  ers.  If,  on  the  contrary,  it  is  left  to  force  itself  on,  hu- 
man nature  must  shudder  at  the  prosneot  held  up.  We 
should  look  in  vain  for  an  examplo  in  the  Spanish  deporta- 
tion or  deletion  of  the  Moors." 

I  need  not  allude  to  the  anti-slavery  sentiment 
of  Virginia.  It  was  written  in  letters  of  living 
light  and  unfading  remembrance  in  the  ordinance 
of  1787,  passed  by  a  unanimous  vote  of  the 
States. 

We  find  that  the  Constitutional  Convention 
was  presided  over  by  Washington,  who  said  "  his 
vote  would  never  be  wanting  for  the  passage  of 
a  law  to  abolish  slavery  ;  "  and  in  that  Conven- 
tion, made  up  of  men  whose  genius  and  patriot- 
ism had  largely  contributed  to  bear  us  up  and 
carry  us  through  the  perilous  .assaults  of  the 
Revolution,  who  drank  in  the  spirit  of  the  con- 
test, and  were  moved  in  the  Convention  by  the 
purpose  to  secure  and  perpetuate  to  themselves 
and  posterity,  union,  freedom,  and  happiness,  all 
expressed  themselves  with  equal  force  and  em- 
phasis, so  far  as  cotemporaneous  history  gives 
any  account,  against  the  evil,  the  wrong,  and  the 
curse,  of  human  bondage. 

Time  will  not  permit  me  to  deal  largely  in  ex- 
tracts from  the  fathers,  nor  are  these  necessary. 
I  will  only  ask  your  attention  to  the  recorded  say- 
ings of  one  or  two  of  the  more  conspicuous  states- 
men. Gouverneur  Morris  said  "he  never  would 
concur  in  upholding  domestic  slavery.  It  was 
a  nefarious  institution.  It  was  the  curse  of 
Heaven." 

Mr.  Madison  "  thought  it  wrong  to  admit  in 
the  Constitution  the  idea  of  property  in  man.-' 

Luther  Martin,  of  Maryland,  said: 

"  Slavery  is  inconsistent  with  the  genius  of  republicanism, 
has  a  tendency  to  destroy  those  principles  on  which  it  is 
supported,  as  it  lessens  the  sense  of  equal  rights  of  mankind, 
and  habituates  us  to  tyranny  and  oppression." 

When  the  Government  went  into  operation,  we 
find  it  supported  by  men  who  were  open  in  their 
expressions  of  hostility  to  slavery. 

John  Adams,  Vice  President,  had  declared  that 
"  consenting  to  slavery  is  a  sacrilegious  breach  of 
trust." 


Alexander  Hamilton,  a  member  of  the  Aboli- 
tion Society  of  New  York,  united  in  a  petition 
for  those  who,  ''free  by  the  laws  of  God,  are  held 
in  slavery  by  the  laws  of  the  Stele.'' 

John  .Jay,  iMiief  Justice  of  the  United  States, 
said  that,  in  his  sight,  slavery  was  an  "  iniquity," 
"  a  sin  of  crimson  dye." 

Benjamin  Franklin,  President  of  the' Abolition 
Society  of  Pennsylvania,  appeared  at  the  bar  of 
Congress,  near  the  close  of  his  well-spent  life, 
and  entreated  "  that  it  would  be  pleased  to 
countenance  the  restoration  of  liberty  to  those 
unhappy  men  who  alone,  in  this  land  of  free- 
dom, are  degraded  into  perpetual  bondage." 

Again,  General  Washington  says,  in  a  letter 
to  John  F.  Mercer,  September  9,  1786  : 

"  I  never  mean,  unless  some  particular  circumstances 
should  compel  me  to  it,  to  possess  another  slave  by  pur- 
ehas  i,  it  being  anion!,'  my  first  wisJies  to  see  some  plan 
adopted  by  which  slavery  in  this  country  may  be  abolished 
by  law." 

The  eloquent  and   patriotic    Henry  says,  in  a 

letter  dated  January  18,  1793: 

"  1  believe  a  time  will  come  when  an  opportunity  will  be 
::  red  to  abolish  this  lamentable  evil.  Everything  we  can 
do  is  to  improve  it,  if  it  happens  in  our  day  ;  if  not,  lei  us 
transmit  to  our  descendants, together  with  oar  slaves,  a  pay 
for  their  unhappy  lot,  and  an  abhorrence  for  slavery.  If  we 
cannot  reduce  this  wished-for  reformation  to  practice,  let  os 
treat  the  unhappy  victims  with  lenity.  1:  is  the  furthest  ad- 
vance we  can  make  toward  justice.  It  is  a  debt  we  owe  to 
the  purity  of  our  religion,  to  show  that  it  is  at  variance  with 
that  law  which  warrants  slavery." 

And  the  eccentric  genius  and  well-wisher  for 
the  liberty  of  the  black  race,  John  Randolph, 
after  speaking  in  deprecation  of  the  extension  of 
slavery  and  its  horrors,  makes  use  of  the  follow- 
ing language : 

"I  give  to  my  slaves  their  freedom,  to  which  my  con- 
science tells  me  they  are  justly  entitled.  It  has  a  long  time 
been  a  matter  of  the  deepest  regret  to  me,  that  the  circum- 
stances under  which  1  inherited  them,  and  the  obstacles 
thrown  in  the  way  by  the  laws  of  the  land,  have  prevented 
my  emancipating  them  in  my  lifetime,  which  it  is  my  full 
intention  fo  do  in  case  I  can  accomplish  it." 

But,  sir,  I  hasten  on,  passing  the  many  pages 
of  testimony  from  distinguished  and  patriotic 
men  in  all  the  walks  of  public  and  private  life, 
to  him  whose  voice  was  so  magic  and  potent  in 
Senate  Chambers  and  among  the  millions  with- 
out, and  at  the  mention  of  whose  name  the  heart 
of  every  American  throbs  with  deeper  emotions, 
and  kindles  with  increased  admiration  and 
pride. 

I  quote  from  a  speech  made  by  the  distin- 
guished Clay,  before  the  American  Colonization 
Society  : 

"  We  are  reproached  with  doing  mischiel  by  the  agitation 
of  this  question.  The  society  goes  into  no  household  to  dis- 
turb us  domestic  tranquility  ;  it  addresses  itselfto  no  slaves, 
to  weaken  their  obligations  "i  obedience.  It  seeks  to  affect 
no  man's  property.  It  neither  has  the  power  nor  the  will  to 
affect  the  property  of  any  one.  Ternary  to  his  consent. 

''  If  they  would  repress  till  tendencies  towards  liberty  and 
ultimate  emancipation,  they  must  do  more  than  put  down 
the  benevolent  efforts  of  tins  society.  They  must  go  back 
to  the  era  of  our  liberty  and  independence,  and  muzzle  tho 
cannon  which  thunders  its  annual  joyous  return.  They  must 
revive  the  slave  trade,  with  all  its  train  of  atrocities." 

Ay,  sir,  revive  the  slave  trade  as  we  now  see 
it  being  revived ! 

"  They  must  suppress  the  workings  of  British  philanthro- 
py, seeking  to  ameliorate  the  condition  of  the  unfortunate 
West  Indian  slaves.  They  must  arrest  the  career  of  South 
American  deliverance  from  thraldom.  They  must  blow  out 
the  moral  lights  around  us,  and  extinguish  that  greatest 


. 


torch  of  all,  which  America  presents  to  a  benighted  work!, 
pointing  the  way  to  their  rights,  their  liberties,  and  their 
happiness.  And  when  they  have  achieved  all  these  purpo- 
ses, their  work  will  be  yel  incomplete.  Iheymnst  penetrate 
the  human  soul,  and  eradicate  the  light  of  reason  and  the 
love  of  liberty.  Then,  and  not  until  then,  when  universal 
darkness  and  despair  prevail,  can  you  perpetuate  slavery, 
and  repress  all  sympathies  and  all  humane  and  benevolent 
efforts  among  freemen  in  behalf  of  the  unhappy  portion  of 
our  race  who  are  dooi 1  to  bondage." 

In  the  Duited  States  Senate,  in  1850,  he  used 
the  following  memorable  words  : 

"I  am  extremely  sorry  to  hear  the  Senator  from  Missis- 
sippi say  that  he  requires,  lirst,  theextension  of  the  Missouri 
compromise  fine  to  the  Pacific,  and  also  that  he  is  not  satis- 
fied with  that,  but  requires,  if  I  understand  him  correctly,  a 
positive  provision  tor  the  admission  of  slavery  south  of  that 
line.  *  *  *  Coming,  as  I  do,  from  a  slave  State,  it  is  my 
solemn,  deliberate,  and  well-matured  determination,  that  no 
power,  ii"  earthly  power,  shall  compel  me  to  vote  for  the 
positive  introduction  of  slavery  either  south  or  north  of  that 
line. 

'•  Sir.  while  you  reproach,  and  justly,  too,  our  British  an- 
cestors for  the  introduction  of  this  institution  upon  the  conti- 
nent of  America,  I  am,  for  one,  unwilling  that  the  posterity 
of  the  present  inhabitants  of  California  and  of  New  Mexico 
shall  reproach  us  for  doing  just  what  we  reproach  Great 
Britain  for  doing  to  us."    *    *    * 

Hear  him  further;  he  says: 

"  So  long  as  God  allows  the  vital  current  to  flow  through 
my  veins,  I  will  never,  never,  never,  by  word  or  thought, 
by  mind  or  will,  aid  in  admitting  one  rood  of  free  territory 
to  the  everlasting  cursu  of  human  bondage*" 

And,  gentlemen  of  the  South,  you  had  not  en- 
tirely abandoned  these  wise  and  salutary  and 
philanthropic  truths — the  doctrine  that  freedom 
is  beneficent  and  just,  and  ought  to  be  extended  ; 
and  that  slavery  was  mischievous  and  immoral, 
and  ought  to  be  restricted — when  you  asked  our 
co-operation  in  the  project  to  annex  Texas ;  if 
you  had,  then  you  were  guilty  of  the  deepest  de- 
ception and  shame.  Am  I  not  correct  ?  Let  us 
see.  Your  party  in  the  North  and  South  pro- 
claimed, in  the  canvass  of  1844,  in  respect  to  the 
annexation  of  Texas,  these  two  fundamental 
ideas  :  first,  that  by  the  removal  of  sJaves  to 
Texas,  Maryland,  Virginia,  Kentucky,  and  Mis- 
souri, would  speedily  become  free  States  ;  second, 
that  the  transfer  of  slaves  to  the  borders  of  Mex- 
ico would  open  the  way  for  the  entire  extinction 
of  slavery,  by  its  transfer  to  regions  where  the 
prejudice  of  race  and  color  do  not  exist ;  and  by 
the  absorption  in,  or  amalgamation  with,  the 
mixed  races  of  the  torrid  regions,  where  they 
could  enjoy  substantial  equality,  social  and  po- 
litical. 

What  said  Hon.  Robert  J.  Walker  during  the 
Presidential  contest  of  that  year,  (1844.)  and  1 
may  say  the  influence  of  whose  ingenious  argu- 
ments, thrown  broadcast  over  the  country  North, 
was  manifest  in  determining  the  fortunes  of  the 
struggle,  and  served  to  secure  for  him,  as  a  re- 
ward for  such  important  political  service,  a  com- 
manding position  in  the  Cabinet  of  President 
Polk? 

•■  Nor  can  it  be  disguised  that,  by  the  reannexation,as  the 
number  of  free  blacks  augmented  in  the slaveholding  States, 
they  would  be  diffused  gradually,  through  Texas,  into  Mex- 
ico and  Central  and  Southern  America,  where  nine-tenths  of 
their  present  population  are  already  of  the  colored  races,  and 
where,  from  their  vast  preponderance  in  number,  they  are 
not  a  degraded  caste,  but  upon  a  footing,  not  merely  of  legal, 
but,  what  is  far  more  important,  of  actual  equality  with  the  rest 
Of  tlie  population.  Here,  then,  if  Texas  is  annexed,  through- 
out the  vast  region  and  salubrious  and  delicious  climate  of 
Mexico  and  of  Central  and  Southern  America,  a  large  and 
rapidly-increasing  portion  of  the  African  race  will  disappear 


from  the  limits  of  the  Union.  The  process  will  be  gradual 
and  progressiva,  without  a  shock  and  without  a  convulsion. 

•■  The  annexation  of  Texas  is  the  only  safety-valve  for  the 
whole  Union,  and  the  only  practicable  outlet  for  the  African 
population,  through  Texas,  into  ilexico  and  Central  and 
Southern  America.     *    *    * 

"  Again,  then,  the  question  is  asked,  '  Is  slavery  never  to 
disappear  from  the  Union?  '  This  is  a  startling  and  moment- 
ous question,  but  the  answer  is  easy  and  the  proof  is  clear  ; 
it  will  certainly  disappear  if  Texas  is  reannexed  to  the  Union  ; 
not  by  abolition,  but  against  and  in  spite  of  all  its  frenzy, 
slowly  and  gradually,  by  ditfusion,  as  it  has  already  thus 
nearly  receded  from  several  of  the  more  northern  of  the 
slaveholding  State's,  and  as  it  will  continue  thus  more  rapidly 
to  recede  by  the  reannexation  of  Texas,  and  finally,  in  the 
distant  future,  without  a  shock,  without  abolition,  without  a 
convulsion,  disappear  into  and  through  Texas,  into  Mexico 
and  Central  and  Southern  America.''    *    *    * 

Mr.  Walker's  was  not  an  isolated  instance  in 
the  promulgation  of  these  views  ;  indeed,  sir, 
these  opinions  upon  the  subject  of  annexation 
were  the  vitalizing  elements  of  the  canvass;  and 
were  urged  by  the  Democratic  party  as  noble  and 
imperishable  progress  injustice  and  civilization, 
by  which  a  portion  of  the  slave  States,  if  not  all, 
were  to  escape  from  the  barbarism  of  the  ruder 
ages,  and  take  their  stand  on  the  principle 
evolved  from  our  struggle  for  independence  and 
our  constitutional  history. 

Turn  to  the  debates  in  Congress,  and  examine 
the  speeches,  in  the  interest  of  Mr.  Polk  and  an- 
nexation, of  Senator  Breese,  of  Illinois,  June  3, 
1844  ;  Senator  Dickinson,  of  New  York,  February 
22,  1845,  (Appendix  Congressional  Globe,  2d 
session  Twenty-eighth  Congress,  page  321  ;) 
Morris,  of  New  Hampshire,  January  25,  1845  ; 
Gen.  Ashley,  of  Arkansas,  February  22,  1845 — 
page  283  of  Debates  ;  Tibbatts,  of  Kentucky,  May 
1 7,  1844.  And  I  will  not  omit  to  quote  from  the 
speech  of  the  honorable  gentleman  now  at  the 
other  end  of  the  avenue,  whose  pious  and  saintly 
regard  for  the  interest  of  free  labor,  and  the  en- 
largement of  the  area  of  freedom,  has  been  pain- 
fully illustrated  since  his  installment  as  Presi- 
dent of  these  United  States. 

In  the  Senate,  June  8,  1844,  Hon.  James  Bu- 
chanan, of  Pennsylvania,  said: 

"  After  mature  reflection,  I  now  believe  that  the  acquisi- 
tion of  Texas  will  he  the  means  of  limiting,  not  enlarging,  the 
dominion  of  slavery.  In  the  government  of  the  world,  Provi- 
dence generally  produces  great  changes  by  gradual  means. 
There  is  nothing  rash  in  the  councils  of  the  Almighty.  May 
not,  then,  the  acquisition  of  Texas  be  the  means  of  drawing 
the  >1 1  vis  far  to  the  south,  to  a  climate  more  Congenial  to  their 
nature  ;  and  may  they  not  finally  pass  off  into  Mexico,  and 
there  mingle  with  a  race  where  no  prejudice  exists  against 
their  color?  *  *  *  Texas  will  open  an  outlet,  and  slave- 
ry itself  may  thus  finally  pass  the  Del  Norte,  and  lie  lost  in 
Mexico." 

Such  were  then  your  declared  objects  and  de- 
sire— perhaps  put  forth  to  deceive — to  obtain 
power  and  betray.  It  now  looks  as  though  they 
were  the  singing  of  Circe  —  "the  voice  of  the 
charmer,  charming  never  so  wisely  " — lulling  the 
suspicions  of  the  people  of  the  North  to  sleep, 
and  deceiving  them  in  regard  to  the  stupendous- 
ness  of  the  fraud  you  were  practicing  upon  their 
credulity.  Whether  so  or  not,  your  party  were 
compelled,  in  consonance  with  the  general  sen- 
timent that  slavery  was  an  evil  of  the  deepest 
and  darkest  dye,  and  that  its  extension,  under 
the  care  and  consent  of  our  Government,  was  an 
intolerable  crime,  to  make  this  record,  to  give 
these  assurances  to  the  people ;  and  I  need  not 
sav  that  they  were  in  accordance  with  the  con- 


viction  of  the  civilized  world — at  least,  outside 
of  the  fifteen  slave  States  of  this  Union. 

The  South  cannot  deny  that  slavery,  up  to  a 
recent  date  in  our  history,  was  made  to  rest 
entirely  on  local  usage ;  it  was  made  so  by  civil 
and  common  law,  because  it  was  assumed  to  be 
in  violation  of  natural  right.  And  being  such  a 
violation,  it  follows  that  it  is  a  moral  wrong; 
and  it  has  been  so  regarded  by  the  mass  of  our 
people  from  the  earliest  times.  In  other  words, 
it  was  a  privileged  and  exceptional  institution, 
doomed,  sooner  or  later,  to  perish.  In  this  view, 
men  have  spoken  of  the  irrepressible  conflict  be- 
tween freedom  and  slavery ;  and  it  is  a  philo- 
sophical truth,  that  one  or  the  other,  in  the  full- 
ness of  time,  must  recede  ;  one  must  triumph 
and  become  supreme.  Sober  men,  and  men  of 
reason,  will  not  be  in  doubt  as  to  the  result — no 
more  than  they  will  doubt  the  ultimate  triumph 
of  right  and  justice,  in  all  things,  over  error  and 
wrong.  In  this  view,  speaking  not  of  my  polit- 
ical duties  and  obligations  to  Government,  and 
disclaiming  in  this  respect,  or  any  other,  the 
right  to  interfere  with  the  domestic  institutions 
of  the  South,  I  hope  the  time  may  come,  not  dis- 
tant, when  the  sun,  in  his  course  across  the  con- 
tinent, will  not  shine  upon  a  slave ;  when  the 
inalienable  rights  which  belong  to  all  men  shall 
be  universally  recognised,  and  become  the  con- 
ceded right  to  be  enjoyed  by  all.  If  I  speak  with 
undue  warmth  of  expression,  iu  the  words  of 
Edmund  Burke,  "something  must  be  pardoned 
to  the  spirit  of  liberty." 

But  to  return  to  the  point  of  digression.  I 
had  been  exhibiting  the  recorded  views  of  the 
Democratic  party  in  regard  to  slavery — the  views 
of  the  South  and  the  North — at  an  early  period, 
and  also  at  a  later  period. 

What  does  the  South  say  now  ?  What  is 
claimed  in  its  name  and  behalf,  in  the  meridian 
of  this  Administration,  and  in  the  strength  of 
your  power?  You  maintain  the  perfect  recti- 
tude of  slavery ;  that  it  is  the  highest  type  of 
civilization ;  that  it  is  neither  wrong  nor  an 
evil;  that  it  is  the  most  economical  form  of 
labor ;  that  it  is  adapted  to  promote  the  most 
perfect  social  condition  ;  that  it  is  in  conformity 
with  the  revealed  Word  of  God  ;  that  it  must 
travel  with  the  Constitution  into  the  Territories, 
and  there  be  sustained  and  protected  by  it;  and 
the  adoption  of  these  views,  or  disunion,  is  the  j 
ultimatum  you  now  propose  to  the  whole  nation. 
Not  only  the  public  men  and  public  bodies  of 
the  South  boldly  declare  and  vehemently  insist 
on  these  doctrines,  but  there  are  camp-followers 
and  soldiers  of  fortune  in  the  North — men  there 
who  say,  with  Charles  O'Concr,  that  the  negro 
is  doomed  by  nature  to  be  the  bondman  of  the 
white  man. 

When  1  uttered  my  convictions  from  my  place 
in  this  House,  in  1354.  that  it  was  the  design  of 
the  Democratic  party — or  those  who  had  control 
of  it — in  the  r'peal  of  the  Missouri  compromise, 
to  extend  negro  bondage,  it  was  denied.  And 
when  again  I  said,  February  24,  1858,  in  a 
speech  then  made,  that  it  was  designed  to  carry 
slavery  into  all  the  Territories  under  the  protec- 
tion of  the  Constitution,  and  that  no  power,  not 


even  the  Congress,  nor  the  people  of  the  Terri- 
tories, could  prevent  or  remove  it,  you  indig- 
nantly repelled  the  charge,  as  false  in  fact  and 
inference.  How  times  have  changed  !  and  more 
rapidly  still  have  men  changed. 

The  President,  in  his  late  message,  lays  down 
your  party  creed.     Hear  what  he  says  : 

••The  right  has  been  established  of  every  citizen  to  take 
his  property  of  any  kind,  including  slaves,  into  tin-  common 
Territories  belonging  equally  to  all  the  States  of  the  Confed- 
eracy .  and  to  have  it  protected  there  under  the  Federal  Con 
stitution.  Neither  Congress,  nor  a  Territorial  Legislature, 
nor  any  human  power,  has  any  authority  to  annul  or  impair 
this  vested  right." 

It  is  you,  then,  not  we,  who  have  changed 
position  upon  this  question  ;  and  the  Republican 
party  was  organized  from  the  necessity  of  the 
case  to  preserve  the  maxims  of  our  early  faith 
and  pledges ;  the  principles  upon  which  our 
Government  was  founded,  and  upon  the  mainte- 
nance of  which,  in  my  judgment,  its  perpetuity 
depends.  I  need  not  speak  of  the  next  step  in 
the  effort  to  nationalize  slavery.  I  claim  to  be 
no  seer  or  prophet  in  respect  to  the  purposes  of 
men,  or  parties,  in  this  work  of  placing  our  Gov- 
ernment under  the  control  of  the  slave  power. 

The  gentleman  from  Texas,  [Mr.  Reagan,]  a 
few  days  since,  with  disingenuous  boldness,  in- 
dicated one  of  the  advance  steps  the  Democratic 
party  will  soon  take ;  and  I  could,  therefore, 
claim  no  credit  for  the  discovery  in  this  instance. 
If  I  understood  him  correctly,  he  claimed  that 
not  even  State  authority — State  sovereignty — 
can  abolish  or  impair  the  right  of  property  in 
slaves,  short  of  revolution — that  is,  the  right  to 
abolish  would  be  a  revolutionary  right ;  that  its 
claim  for  protection  under  Federal  and  State 
authority  rests  upon  the  same  right  as  all  other 
kinds  of  property.  Indeed,  I  do  not  see  why  this 
is  not  a  logical  sequence  from  the  premises. 
Then  it  is,  that  slavery  may  go  to  New  York,  to 
the  home  of  the  Pilgrim  Fathers,  sweep  along  the 
shores  of  the  great  lakes,  and  darken  the  broad 
prairies  of  the  West,  under  the  sanctions  of  this 
vested  right  of  property  in  slaves  under  the 
Constitution.  And,  Mr.  Chairman,  is  it  not  a 
remarkable  and  instructive  fact,  that  while  the 
South  claim  these  immunities  and  this  protec- 
tion for  their  slaves  in  the  Territories  and  in  the 
States,  they  are  at  this  moment  driving  North- 
ern men  from  their  midst,  for  real  or  suspected 
sentiments  in  favor  of  the  institutions  of  the 
North,  or  for  a  preference  for  the  condition  of 
the  free  white  laborers  over  that  of  the  bondmen 
in  chains? 

I  pass,  however,  from  this  sad  spectacle  of  the 
degradation  and  tyranny  incident  to,  I  may  say 
inseparable  from,  a  society  which  insists  upon 
the  Divine  character  of  human  servitude,  to  note 
the  one  step  further  in  this  work  to  complete  its 
supremacy.  The  revival  of  the  African  slave 
trade  rather  follows  as  a  corollary  to  the  doc- 
trine of  extension  and  perpetuation ;  and  I  ap- 
prehend the  party  will  soon  accept  this  tenet  of 
faith,  now  urged  by  a  large  portion  of  its  mem- 
bers in  the  South. 

If  slavery  is  humane,  beneficent,  and  just,  how 
can  the  philanthropy  and  Christianity  of  ourDem- 
ocratic  brethren  be  at  ease,  while  vast  numbers 


of  negroes  in  Africa  are  deprived  of  the  elevating 
influences  of  their  discipline  and  instruction  upon 
the  broad  plantations  of  the  South  ?  In  truth, 
sir,  from  this  view  of  the  rightfulness  of  slavery, 
advocacy  of  the  revival  of  the  slave  trade  fol- 
lows;  and,  as  a  party,  the  Democracy  will  as 
surely  reach  this  point  as  the  waters  of  yonder 
Potomac,  in  their  course,  will  reach  the  Chesa- 
peake Bay. 

The  Republican  party  will  oppose  these  pres- 
ent and  prospective  schemes,  by  which  the  rich 
freight  of  precious  interests  secured  by  our  form 
of  Government  may  be  precipitated  in  ruin,  and 
it  will  seek  to  correct  the  public  sentiment  of  the 
South  in  respect  to  its  own  doctrine,  so  wickedly 
perverted  by  those  in  position  and  power.  It 
will  not  only  do  this,  and  stay  the  march  of  sla- 
very into  the  common  Territory,  but  it  will  un- 
dertake to  correct  the  financial  mismanagement 
and  abuses  which  have  assumed  such  gigantic 
proportions  under  your  administration  of  public 
affairs.  We  shall  strive  to  lessen  the  present 
enormous  and  profligate  expenditures,  establish 
fairness  in  the  dispensation  of  patronage,  and 
secure  perfect  fidelity  and  honesty  with  all  the 
officers  and  agents  of  the  Government. 

No  one  can  complain  of  this,  except  upon  the 
principle  that  he  who  disturbs  the  peace  shall 
have  full  license  to  destroj'  it ;  that  he  who  rav- 
ages a  portion  of  our  inheritance  shall  be  at  lib- 
erty to  pillage  and  lay  waste  the  whole  ;  upon 
the  principle  that  the  highwayman  who  takes 
your  purse  shall  be  entitled  to  your  raiment  and 
food. 

The  Democratic  party  have  exercised  power 
corruptly,  as  the  record  shows.  They  have  not 
only  abused  the  trust  which  free  labor  commit- 
ted to  them,  but  they  have  rioted  upon  their  sub- 
stance, and  wrested  from  them  their  fair,  equal 
privilege  in  the  political  advantages,  honors,  and 
emoluments,  under  the  Government. 

Let  us  see  if  this  is  not  as  I  have  stated ;  and 
I  may  here  remark,  that  I  am  led  to  the  follow- 
ing investigation  with  increased  desire,  because 
of  the  partial  statements,  or  omitted  tables,  in 
the  comparisons  drawn  by  the  honorable  mem- 
ber from  Mississippi  [Mr.  Barksdale]  a  short 
time  since. 

The  population  of  the  South  is  scarcely  more 
than  half  that  of  the  North.  Since  the  organi- 
zation of  the  Government,  there  have  been  eigh- 
teen elections  for  President,  in  which  the  candi- 
dates chosen  were  twelve  of  them  Southerners 
and  slaveholders,  and  only  six  of  them  Northern- 
ers, four  of  which  six  stood  upon  a  Southern 
platform  ;  that  no  Northern  man  has  ever  been 
re-elected,  while  five  of  the  Southern  men  have; 
or,  in  other  words,  that  out  of  the  seventy-two 
years  of  Federal  administration  closing  with  Mr. 
Buchanan's  term,  Southern  men  and  slavehold- 
ers have  held  the  reins  for  forty-three  years,  or 
more  than  two-thirds  of  the  time,  and  have  di- 
rected them  a  greater  part  of  the  remaining 
third. 

In  all  the  other  departments  of  the  Federal 
Government,  the  South  has  enjoyed  the  same  as- 
cendency. It  has  had  seventeen  out  of  the  twen- 
ty-eight judges  of  the  Supreme  Court ;  fourteen 


out  of  the  nineteen  Attorneys  General ;  sixty-one 
out  of  the  seventy-seven  Presidents  of  the  Sen- 
ate ;  twenty-one  out  of  thirty-three  Speakers  of 
the  Bouse  ;  and  eighty  out  of  one  hundred  and 
thirty-four  foreign  Ministers. 

The  Senate  of  the  United  States  consists  of 
sixty-six  members — representing  fifteen  slave 
and  eighteen  free  States  ;  the  free  States  have  a 
white  population  of  about  eighteen  million,  the 
slave  States  have  a  white  population  of  about 
eight  million.  The  Senate  have  twenty-two  com- 
mittees ;  and,  in  fairness,  the  free  States  ought 
to  have  a  preponderance  proportional  to  their 
numbers  and  power.  How  stands  the  case  in 
the  arrangement  of  the  Senate  at  the  beginning 
of  the  present  Congress?  The  chairmanship  of 
sixteen  is  given  to  the  slaveholding  members, 
and  the  chairmanship  of  the  six  others  to  mem- 
bers who  side  with  them  in  politics.  Not  a  sin- 
gle committee  of  any  importance  is  assigned  to 
the  free  States,  either  in  the  chairmanship  or  in 
the  majority  of  its  members.  The  Republicans, 
who  have  twenty-five  representatives  in  the  Sen- 
ate, or  considerably  more  than  one-third  of  the 
-whole  body,  are  allowed  two  members  on  each 
committee  of  seven.  Could  anything  be  more 
sectional  than  this? 

Now,  can  any  one  say  that  this  is  altogether 
fair?  I  believe  I  am  authorized  to  say  that  the 
people  of  the  North  regard  it  as  an  unjust  and 
invidious  discrimination;  and,  because  they  have 
determined  to  take  these  matters  in  hand,  the 
South  should  not  get  into  a  rage,  and  menace  in 
a  furious  manner  a  rupture  of  the  Federal  bands. 
It  is  an  old  maxim,  that  "  wisdom  is  more  valu- 
able than  rubies  ;  "  and  so  I  think  it  will  not  re- 
quire much  observation  and  experience,  under 
this  change  of  administration,  to  convince  the 
wildest  opponent  of  the  present  hour  that  it 
works  well ;  that  the  effects  are  beneficent,  and 
that  the  peace  and  greatness  and  glory  of  our 
whole  country  are  promoted  thereby. 

But  I  am  not  done  with  these  tabular  state- 
ments and  comparisons.  The  following  table  is 
compiled  from  the  last  published  annual  report 
of  the  Secretary  of  the  Treasury,  and  shows  the 
amount  of  revenue  from  the  customs  in  1857, 
and  the  expenses  of  collecting  it  for  the  fiscal 
year  ending  June  30,  1858  : 
Revenue. 

Maine $358,980.56 

X.  Hampshire  5,530.54 

•Vermont 8,581.70 

Massachusetts  7,457,276.06 
Rhode  Island.  '  80,126.06 
Connecticut...  257,307.91 

New  York. . . .  42,721,862.88 
New  Jersev..  5,011.36 

Pennsylvania.       3,6S8,766.96 

Delaware 2,004 .85 

Maryland  ....    .  1,475,823.57 

Virginia 246,130.00 

Dist.  Columbia  25,527.70 

N.Carolina...  66!523.0S 

S.Carolina...         511,856.53 

Georgia 237,108.06 

Alabama 162,3S0.42 

Mississippi . . .  4,445.90 

Florida 56,017.71 

California....  1,5S"8,175.S2 
Louisiana....      3,601,899.20 

Texas 134,517.99 

Ohio 270.104.5S 

Michigan 147,211.53 


Expenses. 

No.  Employes. 

$107,198.69 

121 

10.982.49 

21 

16,285.47 

33 

1,286,531.87 

319 

'  23,552.87 

63 

55.793.34 

4S 

1,303.754.11 

1.311 

9.140.03 

30 

214,492.11 

203 

15,849.36 

S 

144.10S.42 

128 

71,807.73 

58 

4^077.89 

6 

15;962.26 

37 

70,247.51 

51 

35,918.04 

33 

65.295.76 

25 

1,419.70 

6 

30/240.10 

45 

433,004.89 

149 

264,797.35 

210 

5S.H82.59 

52 

17,430.46 

28 

14,934.16 

42 

% 

Illinois 183,878.29  •    10.82  21 

Missouri 365,703.78  12,14  6 

Kentucky....  22,225.41  2,298    I  5 

Tennessee....  149,000.54  7,715.21  3 

Iowa 40,455.80  2,801.10  3 

Wisconsin....  284,790.88  8 

Minnesota...,  68.00  2,460.00  2 

Wash.  Tor....  6,522.61  4,94  9 

on  Ter...  4,199.11  26,996.67  8 

Now,  sir,  you  see  by  this  that  the  State  that  I 
have  the  honor  in  part  to  represent  contributes 
more  to  the  support  of  the  General  Government 
than  all  the  other  States  put*  together ;  and  we 
get  from  the  Federal  Treasury  scarcely  a  dollar 
to  improve  our  channels  of  commerce,  our  rivers 
•and  harbors,  while  'millions  are  lavished  in  eon- 
Btructing  public  buildings,  harbors,  and  fortifica- 
tions, in  Southern  States,  which  contribute  to  the 
general  support  not  a  tithe  in  the  comparison. 
More  than  this.  There,  only  one-fortieth  part  of 
the  revenue  is  expended  in  collecting  it;  and  in 
Maryland,  one-tenth  is  consumed;  in  Virginia, 
North  Carolina.  Alabama,  and  Mississippi,  one- 
fourth  ;  in  Florida,  more  than  half;  while  in 
Delaware,  it  seems  that  the  custom-houses  do  a 
losing  business,  costing  seven  times  as  much  as 
they  yield. 

This  is  not  all.  Under  your  administration  of 
the  Government,  the  first  year  of  Mr.  Buchanan's 
term,  the  expenditures  amounted  to  the  smm  of 
$81,585, 667. 76 — more  than  the  expenditures  for 
the  whole  of  the  first  twenty  years  of  our  national 
existence.  JFor  the  first  forty  years,  from  178.9 
to  1S30,  inclusive,  including  the  war  of  1812,  our 
expenses  were  §293,541,195.92,  and  for  five  years 
ot  Mr.  Pierce's  and  Mr.  Buchanan's  reign,  it 
amounted  to  $316,949,226.65;  so  they  spent  of 
the  people's  money  $33,408,030.73  more,  during 
five  years,  than  for  the  first  half  of  the  entire  pe- 
riod of  our  national  being. 

During  Jackson's  term,  the  revenue  did  not 
exceed  §52(5,000,000  annually,  and  yet  he  was 
able  to  conduct  the  Government  from  this,  and 
extinguish  $50,000,000  of  the  public  debt ;  but 
our  present  Chief  Magistrate,  with  a  revenue  of 
over  fifty  million  dollars  annually,  is  not  only 
unable  to  balance  the  accounts  and  extinguish 
the  public  debt,  but  during  the  firstyear  increases 
it  S40,000,000  under  his  financial  mismanage- 
ment, extravagance,  and  corruption.  The  ex- 
penses of  the  army  have  nearly  trebled,  and  the 
expense  of  co'lecting  the  revenue  has  increased 
over  forty  per  cent.,  or  Si, 700,000. 

In  1840,  the  "miscellaneous"  items  were  se- 
verely criticized,  and  contributed  in  a  large  de- 
gree to  defeat  Mr.  Van  Buren  in  his  canvass  for 
re-election.  It  then  rose  to  $'-,500,000,  and  it 
now  reaches  the  vast  sum  of  Sl8,000,000.  Gen- 
tlemen will  recollect  the  charges  then  preferred 
against  Mr.  Van  Buren,  because  of  his  prodigality 
in  furnishing  and  conducting  the  White  House  ; 
and  yet  all  was  within  the  outlay,  over  salary,  of 
0  a  year — while  Mr.  Buchanan,  with  his 
more  expensive  luxuries,  elegance,  and  profligate 
habits,  squanders  $35,000  a  year,  exclusive  of 
his  salary.  Now,  when  it  is  considered  that  this 
money  comes  mainly  from  taxes,  direct  and  indi- 
rect, on  the  industry  of  the  country,  three-fourths 
of  which  is  found  in  the  North — a  burden  upon 
our  capital,  our  skiil,  our  arts,  our  professions, 


and  our  labor — it  should  not  create  wonder  or 
surprise  that  we  seek  to  return  to  frugal  and 
economical  expenditure  ;  and  to  this  end  will  ex- 
ert all  fair  means  at  the  ballot-box,  and  in  every 
constitutional  way,  to  obtain  supremacy  in  the 
affairs  of  the  Government. 

I  will  pursue  these  statements  and  comparisons 
no  further.  Sufficient  has  been  shown  for  my 
purpose,  and  sufficient,  I  trust,  to  convince  all 
fair-minded  men  that,  from  the  "highways  an«l 
by-ways  of  the  so-called  Democratic  party  there 
comes  up  an  insufferable  stench,"  pervading 
every  tissue  of  their  administration. 

But,  sir,  bad  as  these  practices  are  in  the  ad- 
ministration of  the  Government,  demoralizing  as 
are  the  means  employed  to  accomplish  these 
purposes,  and  proscriptive  and  intolerant  as  are 
the  usages  of  this  party  in  the  distribution  of 
favors  and  patronage,  it  is  of  minor  importance 
compared  with  the  obstinate  and  continued  effort 
to  destroy  the  principles  of  justice  and  freedom 
which  are  the  substratum  of  the  whole  super- 
structure of  our  free  institutions.  It  is  said  by 
Tacitus,  I  believe,  that  the  first  advances  of 
tyranny  are  steep  and  perilous ;  but  when 
once  you  are  entered,  parties  and  instruments 
are  ever  ready  to  espouse  you. 

How  true  is  this  of  that  bold  step  of  the  slave 
power  which  first  attracted  the  attention  of  our 
confiding  people!  I  allude  to  the  overthrow  of 
that  time-honored  ordinance  of  freedom,  in  1854, 
from  which  act  every  patriot  heart  in  the  North 
shrank  wTth  horror,  and  the  whole  nation  was 
then  aroused  to  a  sense  of  danger.  Moses  was 
not  more  surprised  and  appalled,  when  he  came 
down  from  the  mountains  and  found  his  hosts  in 
tumult,  than  were  the  freedom-loving  people  of 
this  Confederacy  when  violent  hands  were  laid 
on  this  security  to  free  labor ;  and  none  were 
found,  in  all  the  North,  so  reckless  as  to  applaud 
the  cruel  purpose.  Since  then — ah  !  most  pain- 
ful truth — since  then,  from  among  the  universal 
sentiment  of  condemnation,  men  have  been  found 
who  approve  of  the  work,  and  go  forth  with  this 
party  to  new  scenes  and  fresh  fields  of  innova- 
tion and  invasion.  The  Kepublican  party  intend 
to  arrest  their  progress,  and  they  can  only  do  so 
effectually  by  taking  the  Govenrment  into  their 
own  hands.  They  will  trench  upon  not  the  least 
constitutional  right ;  they  intend  no  overt  act, 
nor  will  they  countenance  any,  affecting  the 
safety  or  security  of  Southern  men's  human 
chattels  ;  they  contemplate  no  illegal  conspiracy, 
nor  secret  treason,  but  will  march  with  firm  and 
honest  tread  to  the  very  verge  of  their  constitu- 
tional rights,  and  there  stop. 

The  most  conclusive  proof  that  there  are  no 
considerable  number  of  men  in  the  North  with 
such  wrong  intent,  is  to  be  found  in  the  late  feeble 
attempt  of  John  Brown  "  to  promote  the  good  of 
freedom  by  the  evil  of  servile  strife  and  civil 
war  ;  "  who,  after  two  years  of  effort,  with  all  his 
power  to  inspire  men  with  his  own  views,  with 
his  perseverance  and  heroism  of  character;  with 
his  truth,  sincerity,  and  honesty,  heightened  and 
impelkd  by  the  cruelties  and  wrongs  heaped 
upon  him  and  his  family  in  Kansas,  you  find  him 
surrounded  by  only  sixteen  white  men  and  five 


8 


negroes  in  his  attempt  "to  undo  the  heavy  bur- 
dens, and  to  let  the  oppressed  go  free."  And  it 
is  not  likely  that  the  folly  and  madness  of  even 
this  experiment  will  be  repeated  during  the  pres- 
ent century,  if  ever.  It  is  not  from  the  North 
slaveholders  have  cause  of  alarm  in  methods  of 
conspiracy,  violence,  and  blood.  Jefferson  fore- 
saw the  source  of  greatest  peril,  when  he  said: 

"  The  whole  commerce  between  master  and  slave  is  a  per- 
petual exercise  of  the  most  boisterous  passion — the  most  un- 
remitting despotism  on  the  one  part,  and  degrading  sub- 
mission on  the  other."  *  *  *  "Indeed,  I  tremble  for 
mycountry  when  I  reflect  that  God  is  just."  *  *  *  "The 
Almighty  has  Ho  attribute  which  can  take  side  with  us  in 
such  a  contest." 

That  is,  a  contest  between  the  enslavers  and 
the  enslaved. 

From  the  views,  then,  of  one  of  the  most  dis- 
tinguished of  Southern  statesmen,  it  is  not  a 
wild  conjecture  to  suppose  that,  iu  the  progress 
of  events,  unless  some  change  takes  place  in  his 
condition,  the  slave  will  rise  and  assert  his  nat- 
ural rights,  and  stamp  on  "the  wild  and  guilty 
phantasy  that  man  can  hold  property  in  man." 

And  now,  .Mr.  Chairman,  a  word  in  respect  to 
this  thing  with  seven  heads  and  ten  horns,  which 
has  furnished  a  theme  for  so  much  impetuous 
declamation  and  ridiculous  parade  with  our 
our  Southern  friends,  and  I  close.  I  refer,  sir, 
to  the  publication  of  Mr.  Helper,  entitled  The 
Impending  Crisis  of  the  South,  mainly  drawn  from 
the  United  States  census  of  1850,  calculated  to 
prove  that  slavery  is  a  curse  to  the  South  ;  that 
it  is  paralyzing  to  the  prosperity  of  the  South — 
an  incubus  upon  their  material  and  social  ad- 
vancement ;  aud  that  it  operates  to  crush  out  all 
the  individualism,  hopes,  and  primal  instincts, 
of  the.  non-slaveholding  class,  and  is  therefore 
to  be  deprecated. 

And  just  here  I  will  be  allowed  to  read  from 
this  work,  the  recommending  of  which,  by  acci- 
dent or  otherwise,  has  been  sufficient  cause,  in 
the  view  of  Democrats,  for  keeping  this  House 
unorganized  for  eight  weeks,  and  for  denouncing 
Republican  members  with  all  manner  of  oppro- 
brious epithets — yes,  sir,  read  from  this  work  the 
most  intense  abolition,  treasonable,  and  incen- 
diary doctrine  to  be  found  between  its  lids,  the 
utterances  of  one  of  Virginia's  own  sons,  and 
who  has  just  been  rewarded  by  this  same  Dem- 
ocratic party  with  the  French  mission  !  Listen 
to  the  heretical  language  of  Hon.  Charles  James 
Faulkner,  in  the  Virginia  House  of  Delegates, 
January  20,  1832 : 

,:  Sir,  if  there  be  one  who  concurs  with  that  gentleman  as 
to  the  harmless  character  of  this  institution,  let  me  request 
him  to  compare  the  condition  of  the  slaveholding  portion  of 
lies  Commonwealth,  barren,  desolate, and  seared,  as  it  were, 
by  the  avenging  hand  ofHeaven,with  the  description  which 
we  have  of  this  country  from  those  who  Qrst  broke  its  virgin 
soil.  To  what  is  this  change  to  be  attributed  ?  Alone  tolhe 
toit/teri  <       \ing  effects  of  slavery— to  that  vice  in  the 

organization  of  society,  by  which  one' halt  of  its  inhabitants 
are  arm;  ed  in  interest  and  feeling  against  the  other  halt— to 
that  unfortunate  slate  of  society  in  which  freemen  regard 
labor  as  disgraceful,  and  slaves  shrink  from  it  as  a  burden 
tyrannically  imposed  upon  them. 

"In  the  language  of  the  wise  and  patriotic  Jefferson, '  You 
must  approach  it— you  must  bear  it— von  must  adopt  some 
plan  ol  emancipation,  or  worse  will  follow.'  " 

Now,  I  do  not  think  I  have  ever  said  anything 


as  fierce  and  defiant  and  sweeping  in  condemna- 
tion of  your  system  of  negro  slavery  as  this;  and 
I  do  not  know  that  Mr.  Helper  has.  I  do  not  say 
it  is  unjust  or  unwise  ;  it  is  rather  a  question  of 
policy  or  taste,  which  I  leave  to  Soul  hern  gen- 
tlemen to  settle  in  their  own  way.  But  to  the 
matter  of  arraignment;  and  I  have  this  to  say: 
my  constituents  do  not  expect  me  to  ask  permis- 
sion of  the  South,  when,  or  how,  or  where,  I  may 
endorse  or  recommend,  for  circulation  or  other- 
wise, any  pamphlet  or  book  whatever.  They 
treat  with  respectful  disdain  yo.ur  perversions  of 
my  motives,  and  condemn  the  disingenuous  ar- 
gument of  gentlemen,  wrung"  from  infelicitous 
phrases  and  sentences  to  be  found  in  the  work," 
to  cast  imputations  upon  my  patriotism  and 
honor. 

My  constituents  and  the  free  people  of  the 
North  have  not  arrived  at  the  point  when  they 
will,  in  servile  obedience  to  any  clas3  of  men,  be 
dictated  to  in  what  they  shall  read,  nor  what  they 
shall  respectfully  advise  others  to  read  ;  and  I 
trust  in  God  they  never  will.  A  large  majority 
of  the  people  of  the  North  will  take  the  liberty 
of  exposing  the  injurious  and  debasing  influence 
of  slavery  upon  our  national  politics;  its  disad- 
vantages in  an  economical  point  of  view;  its 
antagonism  to  Christianity  and  the  higher  and 
better  interests  of  civilization  ;  and  acting  upon 
these  convictions,  in  stern  political  duty,  will 
strive  to  limit  its  extension  and  destroy  its  pre- 
ponderance in  the  affairs  of  the  General  Govern- 
ment. 

This  is  no  new  doctrine  or  modern  theory;  it 
was  the  universal  conviction  of  our  people,  up 
to  a  few  years  ago,  as  patent  upon  every  page 
of  our  political  history  as  the  talismanic  charac- 
ters on  the  cimeter  of  Solyman  were  to  his  hosts  ; 
and  I  have  aimed,  I  trust  successfully,  to  show 
that  the  Republican  party,  of  which  I  am  proUd 
to  be  a  member,  is  but  the  historical  outgrowth 
of  the  condition  and  circumstances  of  our  coun- 
try, while  its  principles  are  as  old  as  the  frame- 
work of  our  society,  and  coeval  with  the  first 
notions  of  our  ancestors  of  independent  self- 
government. 

It  occupies  now  no  temporary  ground  ;  it  has 
no  entirely  special  purpose ;  but  with  duties  as 
varied  as  the  interests  of  our  free  institutions 
and  the  welfare  of  our  people,  the  purity  of  its 
doctrines,  sanctioned  by  the  fathers  and  sustain- 
ed by  a  long  line  of  illustrious  patriots  and 
statesmen,  gives  it  a  permanancy  and  promise 
not  measured  by  generations  of  men.  And  to 
the  immediate  causes  which  called  our  organiza- 
tion into  being,  add  the  lawless  and  unprovoked 
violence  to  freemen  in  Kansas ;  the  attempt  not 
only  to  force  slavery  upon  that  fair  domain,  con- 
trary to  the  will  of  the  people,  but  to  convey 
and  protect  it  by  Federal  power  wherever  the 
Constitution  extends;  and  now  the  espionage 
and  ostracism  carried  on  in  the  South  against 
Northern  men — and  you  have  given  us  a  rising 
power  and  swelling  current  of  public  opinion 
which  can  no  more  be  turned  aside  than  the 
course  of  the  winds  or  the  on-sweeping  tide  of 
the  ocean.