(navigation image)
Home American Libraries | Canadian Libraries | Universal Library | Community Texts | Project Gutenberg | Biodiversity Heritage Library | Children's Library | Additional Collections
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload
See other formats

Full text of "Practice in the United States Patent Office: A Table of Cases Construing and ..."

This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project 
to make the world's books discoverable online. 

It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject 
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books 
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover. 

Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the 
publisher to a library and finally to you. 

Usage guidelines 

Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the 
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to 
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying. 

We also ask that you: 

+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for 
personal, non-commercial purposes. 

+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine 
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the 
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help. 

+ Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find 
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it. 

+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just 
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other 
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of 
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner 
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe. 

About Google Book Search 

Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers 
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web 



at |http : //books . google . com/ 





HARVARD LAW LIBRARY. 



Received 



A^i<l^C^:A' /^y /^oY 



\ 



<- 



PRACTICE 



IN THE 



UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 



A TABLE OF CASES CONSTRUING AND DEFINING 

THE SEVERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND 

OF CASES SUBSEQUENTLY CITED 



e) J. STODDARD 

(Betroit Bar) 



DETROIT , 5 '^"X. 

DRAKE LAW BOOK CO. \^ "1 

1907 






Copyright 1906 

BY 

E. J. STODDARD 



^^.^1/VvfiL/vC^ ^^ i^^T 



PREFACE 

The compilation of the data from which these annotations were 
taken was commenced about twenty years ago. All the practice 
decisions then published were carefully read, their subject matter 
noted for personal use and found helpful. This work has been con- 
tinued with the reading of all current cases as issued, till, at the 
time of going to press, about 3,000 cases have been prepared for this 
publication. 

It is thought that the present compact form will be found sufficient 
in most instances, but for rules that have been frequently construed 
verbal notes wtU be desirable. 

Should this publication, which is believed to be the only one of 
its class and scope, prove acceptable to the Profession, a new edition 
of the Rules may be issued, accompanied by full syllabi notes of all 
decisions construing them, grouped together according to their 
subject matter. 

E. J. STODDARD. 

Detroit, Mich., December, 1906. 



INTRODUCTION 



Individual judgment will vary in many instances as to the proper 
rule under which a given note should be placed. A few remarks may 
therefore prove useful: 

Notes relating to Affidavits, not specially provided for, are placed 
under rule 76. 

Notes relating to Shifting the Burden of Proof in Interference 
Cases are placed under rule 116. 

Notes relating to Public Use Proceedings are placed under rule 126. 

Rule No. 130 was added after the matter for this work went to 
press. All notes which should properly be placed under this rule 
will be found under rule 124, in the interpretation of which the 
necessity for the rule was developed. 

Notes relating to New Trials are placed under rules 142 and 144. 

The publication of the Commissioner's Decisions began in 1869, 
and has been continued in annual volumes. 

The Official Gazette has been published in the following manner: 
from 1872-1882 inclusive, two volumes per annum; 1883, three vol- 
umes; 1884-1892, inclusive four volumes per annum; 1893 to date,, 
six volumes per anntim. 

Should you desire all the cases construing any one rule or its 
subject matter, follow down the right hand or fourth coltunn on 
each page until the number appears. The title opposite on the same 
line is the case desired. 

Should you desire to know if any case has been subsequently 
construed, find your case in its alphabetical position in the first 
column, then look for the figures immediately below its citations in 
the Commissioner's Decisions and the Official Gazette columns. 
These annotations are mostly subsequent discussions of the case. 

Should you desire the citation on any given title, you will find it 
on the same line opposite its alphabetical position. 

Should you desire a citation to the Commissioner's Decisions, 
having it in the Official Gazette, or, vice versa, having it in the Com- 
missioner's Decisions, should you desire it in the Official Gazette, 
this list will accommodate you, as both are given opposite each other, 
where it is possible. 



PRAaiCE 

IN THE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Abel and Dewar v. Maxim v. Nobel. 



Aberli. 



Abraham v. Fletcher. 

Ackerman 

Ackerman v. Archer. 



Ackerson . 



Ackroyd 

Actiengesellschaft ApoUinaris-Brunnen v. 

Saratoga Seltzer Spring Co 

Adam 

Adaihs 



Adams. 



Adams. 
Adams. 

Adams . 
Adams . 



Adams 

Adams v. Murphy. 
Adams v. Murphy. 



1891-102 



1900-95 



1869-50 
1880-131 
1879-27 
1880-23 

1869-74 

1872-162 
1872-198 
1889-138 

1893-58 

1879-246 
1900-106 
1873-18 



1898-109 



1902-252 
1903-299 



56-139 
83-1804 
83-1806a 
97-2744 

91-2371 

97-1175 
111-253 



1900-86 
1900-92 



17-1036 
15-562 



6-837 



63-466 

16-810 

92-190 

3-150 

6-837 
89-2068 

83-1994 
89-1344 
97-1373 

100-453 
106-541 
106-997 

106-999 

114-2093 

123-1288 
123-2313 
123-2631 

119-650 
91-2207 
91-2209 



41 



127. 148 
5,6 



37 



40 

158 

6 

37,41 



41,42 
41,42 

94 



94, 131 
139, 146 
139 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O G. 



Rule 



Adams v. Murphy. 
Adams v. Murphy. 



Adams v. Tannage Patent Co. 



Adler v. Van Wagener. 
Adriance. Piatt & Co... 



Agee. 



Alabama Tube & Iron Co. 



Alabastine Co. v. Payne. 



Albert. 



Aldrich and Evans 

Aldrich and Spalding v. Bingham. 



Ale 

Alexander. 



Allen 

Allen, Com. of Patents v. The U. S. of A., 
ex rel. G. A. Lowry and Planters Com- 
press Co. 



Allen and Moody v. Gilman . 



1900-100 
1901-401 



1897-494 
1897-353 

1875-123 
1881-52 



1902-399 

1902-192 

1886-272 

1901-66 

1876-40 
1871-90 
1871-94 

1901-18 
1902-98 

1904-92' 



1872-204 

1872-205 
1872-231 
1873-91 



91-2373 

96-845 

107-1660 
110-1742 

79-2015 



8-728 

20-1820 

83-1803 
83-1993 
89-2070 
96-1036 
107-835 

101-1609 
103-2173 

99-2321 
110-602 

35-1438 
80-658 

96-426 
103-889 

9-407 



94-584 
103-2173 

98-2364 
101-2569 

109-1070 

116-2253 

117-277 

119-2521 
120-2129 
121-1348 
121-1350 
122-2688 
122-2689 
123-2973 

2-293 



139, 142 



37 



125 



26, 175 
176 



41, 42, 
65 

88 
102, 142 



170 

139 
122, 124 



107, 110 
159 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Allen V. Ctdp. 



1897-472 



Allfrie V. Sower. . . 
Allis V. Buckstaff. 
Akninana 



1882-480 
1902-293 
1890-75 



Almy 

Altmann 



Alton 

Amand 

Ament 

American Bell Telephone Co 

American Bell Telephone Co. v. Cushman 
et al. ; American Bell Telephone Co. v. 

Hubbard et al. 

American Bell Telephone Co. v. McKees- 
port Telephone Co. 

American Bell Telephone Co. v. The Peo- 
ple's Telephone Co. 

American Bell Telephone Co. v. Spencer 

American Bell Telephone Co. v. United 
States of America. 



1897-52 



1904-641 
1903-106 



American Cotton Tie Co. v. Simmons. . 



American Dunlop Tire Co. v. Erie Rubber 
Co. 

American Fibre Chamois Co. v. William- 
son et al. Americani Fibre Chamois Co. 
V. Buckskin Fibre Co. et al. 

American Grocery Co. v. Benett, Sloan 
&Co. 

American Lubricating Oil Co 



1893-46 
1893-646 



1893-478 

1884-476 
1891-183 
1896-106 

1881-322 



79-1523 
92-2004 
100-450 

122-2391 

22-1706 

100-1331 

116-1684 

80-1476 

82-186 
91-1616 

113-1968 

103-661 

116-696 

63-162 

66-136 

83-1511 

64-1134 
83-745 

29-1029 



20-299 
80-362a 



1895-412 


71-1903 




79-1363 
79-1368C 


1882-607 


22-1976 




80-657 


1896-197 


74-963 




87-2121 


1896-469 


72-143 




94-1789 


1896-406 


71-1770 


' 


78-1431 


1876-56 


9-687 


1879-222 





37. 124 
42,60 

66,66 
31,47 



69, 171 
146 
41 
16 



10 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



American Road Machine Co. v. Pennock 

& Sharp Co. 
American Soda Fountain Co. v. Green 



American Wire Weavers* Protective Asso- 
ciation. 

Amoskeag Mfg. Co. v. Trainer 



Anders v. Gilliland. 

Anderson 

Anderson 



Anderson. 



Anderson 

Anderson 

Anderson and Dyer v. Lowry. 



Anderson v. Eiler. 



Anderson v. Vrooman . 

Andrew 

Andrews 



Andrews v. Carman. 



Andrews v. Hovey. 



Andrews v. Hovey. 

Andrews v. Nelson. 
Andrews v. Nelson. 
Andrews v. Nelson. 
Andrews v. Thum. . 



1896-556 

1896-491 
1897-304 

1901-23 



1880-464 



1881-1 
1889-167 
1892-221 
1893-12 

1893-12 



1893-51 

1904-565 

1899-230 



1891-501 



1870-75 
1879-99 

1876-372 
1877-7 

1887-633 

1888-275 
1891-186 

1903-287 
1904-291 



1895-507 



77-633 
78-1255 

76-964 

94-586 
98-2366 

17-1217 
86-1324 
87-179 
95-230 

19-177 

47-1633 

61-886 

62-448 

80-1272 

94-431 

100-2601 

63-463 

113-2504 

89-1861 

91-819 

91-1034 

94-224 

57-410 
84-649 

123-2975 

16-105 
16-106 

9-1011 

41-1162 
90-962 

42-1285 

105-2059 

111-1038 

123-1667 

72-899 

80-965 



37 
22 
167 

5,6, 20 



43,78 
50 
124, 126 



96,97,124 
85 
41,48 



113 
159 
37,97,126 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



11 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Anheviser-Busch Brewing Association v. 
Piza. 

Anilin v. Higgin 



Annand v. Spalckhaver. 
Annand v. Spalckhaver. 

Annand V. Spalckhaver. 

Anson v. Woodbury 



Anson v. Woodbury. 



Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Electrical 
Supply Co. 



Appel. 



Apperly and Clissold. 
Appert V. Parker 



Appert V. Schmertz . 



Appleton . 
Arakelion. 



Arbetter v. Lewis. 



Archer. 
Arkell. . 



Arkell. 



1885-404 
1890-95 

1878-335 
1889-143 

1900-172 
1901-212 
1901-234 

1901-234 
1901-212 

1877-4 

1877-49 
1880-69 

1877-49 

1877-4 

1880-69 

1892-313 



1898-152 



1870-163 

1896-5 

1896-371 

1898-524 
1898-77 



1869-8 
1898-243 

1902-161 



1891-191 
1871-257 
1871-263 

1871-263 

1871-257 

1878-135 
1878-136 



32-1123 

14-414 

93-735 
97-2083 

97-2741 
97-2083 

11-243 
12-1 



58-1692 

80-517 
92-1038 

84-1145 

97-958 
97-2982 



74-1587 

83-1511 

104-2147 

84-508 

94-1188 

94-1970 

123-1286 



85-1077 
99-1866 

99-1383 

109-1067 
109-2170 

57-696 



15-385 



122 
122 

109, 130 

95, 101, 
126, 128 

110, 122 



68 



122 



76 



37 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Arkell. 



Armstrong 

Amdt 

Amheim V. Finster. 

Arnold v. Tyler 



Arnold v. Vaughen and Cabot v. Arnold 
and Fisher. 



Aron V. The Manhattan Ry. Co. 



Asencio v. Russell. 



Ashtabula Telephone Co. 



Aspegren & Co. 



Aston. 

Atherton and Happ v. Cheney. 

Atkins V. Paul v. Johnson 

Atlantic Works v. Brady 



^tterbury. 



Atwater. 
Atwood.. 



Atwood. 



Auchu 

Auer 

Auerbach and Gubing v. Wis well. 



1877-73 
1889-139 

1895-18 
1900-167 
1886-89 
1896-46 

1897-349 
1904-78 



1889-650 

1890-67 
1890-132 

1902-188 



1904-178 



1902-265 



1904-294 

1901-35 

1883-214 

1891-227 
1893-32 
1893-35 
1894-21 

1876-79 



1897-36 

1869-98 

1870-130 
1871-112 

1888-74 
1890-145 

1892-120 



11-1111 

71-1615 

93-751 

34-700 

79-156 
86-800 

109-805 

110-2510 
115-1328 

49-1365 

78-1107 
80-1128 

99-2321 
110-2015 

110-860 

114-2381 

115-249 

100-684 

110-309 
113-1420 

122-730 

111-1040 

94-1785 

23-1330 

80-1128 



9-640 
79-2196 

80-965 



25-1190 
29-176 

44-341 
113-850 

59-1761 
.116-595 
108-289 
113-284 



66 

29 
30,31 



116 



116 
179 



126 
122 
113, 119 



142 

37,39,40 
66 



145 

68, 142 
48, 122 
124, 133 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



13 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Atunonier. 
Austin. . . . , 



Austin V. Johnson. 



Austin V. Winslow. 



Autenrieth and Kane v. Soresen. 
A3rres 



Baackes 

Bach 

Bachman v. Southgate 

Backus Portable Steam Heater Co. 



Bacon 

Bader v. Vajen. 



Badger 

Badger v. Morgan and Hoheisel. 

Baer 

Bagot and Dishart 

Bailey 



Bailey. 



Baker 

Baker 

Baker and Patitz v. Edwards. 
Baldwin 



1893-77 
1891-127 

1901-391 



1898-104 



1890-103 
1895-3 



1893-70 



1904-269 
1892-13 

1902-161 
1899-329 



1901-196 



1904-117 

1900-80 

1886-39 

1890-123 
1891-64 

1872-127 
1889-232 



63-1816 

66-1059 

106-2292 

96-2686 

103-659 

104^1124 

109-809 

83-1991 

87-695 
103-226 

120-2126 
61-1944 

99-1866 
103-429 
113-852 
114-2091 

63-909 

118-163 

111-806 

68-386 

91-2571 

99-861 

87-1236 

106-2015 

109-809 
113-552 
115-806 
123-2313 

97-1696 
117-698 
109-1609 
91-1802 
37-781 
95-2486 

62-608 

98-2365 
101-1129 



1876-76 



49-1363 

123-1990 

9-639 



83 
70 

116 



124 
31, 49, 
209 



37 

68, 171 
124 
199 



112 



60 
169 
42 
47,94 



37 

6,6 

122 

88 



H 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Baldwin. 



Baldwin 

Baldwin 

Baldwin v. Bigelow. 



Ball. 



BaU. 



Ball 

Ball V.Flora. 



Ball V.Flora. 



Ball V. Flora.. . 
Ball V. Langles. 



Ball V. Rigo 

Baltzley v. Seeberger. 

Balzer 

Bancroft and Thome. 

Bancroft and Thome. 



Banigan Co. v. Bloomingdale. 
Banks V. Snediker 



Banks]v. Snediker. 
Bantz V. Frantz.... 



Baptist. . . 
Barcellos. 
Bark 



1902-54 



1903-380 



1875-65 



1870-97 

1871-144 

1873-170 

1902-102 



1902-326 



1880-687 



1902-470 

1881-55 

1890-30 

1900-33 

1899-224 
1879-304 
1880-95 

1880-95 
1879-304 

1882-300 

1901-150 

1880-4 

1894-108 



9^-1706 

99-1623 

99-2968 

122-3012 

123-1663 

106-1780 
124-318 
7-1011 
23-2413 



21-1876 

98-2366 

100-1113 

103-661 

122-3011 

100-2602 
117-2088 
117-2362 

117-2362 
117-2088 

121-2668 
18-1405 
96-2577 

119-1258 

115-1329 

101-2824 

20-1893 

88-546 

90-1539 
92-1236 

89-1670 
16-1096 

17-508 

21-2037 
23-2029 

97-191 
17-110 
69-369 



207 



34 



126, 140 



148 



124 
122 

42, 171 
41 

41 

122 

122, 124 
126, 128 

37,93,122 
124. 153 



50,133 
37,50,133 
81 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



15 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Barker and Mack 


1873-123 
1897-76 




133. 146 


Barnes 


80-2038 

88-945 

91-2003 

111-2491 

116-247 
63-1669 
17-1096 

87-2118 

100-1113 
100-2757 

116-247 
97-2634 

87-1076 

118-2254 

66-930 

66-1664 

112-729 

115-508 

79-2020 

87-895 

87-1075 
90-1158 
92-1038 

97-1176 
101-1609 

38-417 

112-2096 

9-883 

16-233 
23-341 


66 


Barnes 


68.133 
37. 68 


Barney 


1890-171 
1880-134 

1899-126 


Barnev v. ICellofiTfir 


101. 124 


Bamhart Bros and Soindler 


126 


Bamhart 


79 


Barr Car Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern 
Ry. Co. 

Barratt v. Duell. Com. of Patents 




1901-621 

1899-320 

1891-126 
1891-164 
1904-392 

1897-606 

1901-177 

1886-9 
1904-448 
1876-109 
1889-222 

1878-164 
1880-154 

1869-103 

1870-22 
1870-58 
1871-253 
1878-129 

1871-298 

1872-218 

1872-230 

1873-44 

1873-84 


31 


Barrett 

Barrett , 


166, 176 
68, 176 


Barrett v. Harter 




Barrett v. Se)rmotir, Com. of Patents 

Barri 


167 


Barrickle , 


76 


Barrv 


170 


Barsaloux 




Barsaloux. Tames and Lvon 


28,88 


Bartholemew 


24 


Bartholomew 


4-691 
42-58 
98-229 


24,79 




21-1111 
42-293 



16 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Barton v. Babcock, Manton and Boyd 

Basch V. Hammond 


1869-67 




93, 94 


1904-474 


113-662 


110,118 


Bassett 


1891-69 


66-997 








114-542 




Bassett 


1902-87 


98-2174 
100-2602 








Bate 


1879-84 


16-1012 


39 




1879-211 






Bate Refricreratinsr Co. v. Gillett 


1882-426 


22-1206 


29 


Bate Refrigerating Co. v. Hammond 


1889-330 


46-689 

70-1633 
87-1784 
99-2361 




Bate Refrigerating Co. v. Sulzberger 


1896-233 


70-1633 






1895-315 


46-689 
87-1785 
94-2361 
98-229 




Bates 


1879-365 
1880-661 


15-337 

83-157 

87-517 

111-1365 








Bates V. Coe 


1879-365 
1880-Ml 


15-331 

83-157 

87-517 

111-1575 








Bates V. Seeger and Boyd 


1872-232 


2-492 








6-837 




Bauer v. Crone 


1904-336 


111-1939 

120-1824 

99-448 


113 


Bauer v. Crone 


148 


Bauercamper 


1902-130 


77 






109-2442 




Baxter 


1872-226 


2-470 


66 






6-837 




Baxter. 


1891-147 


66-1448 
99-862 








Beach 


1873-88 


3-607 
6-837 








Beach 


1897-64 
1894-618 


80-1476 
69-1067 


69 


Beach v. American Box Machine Co. and 




Horace Inman. 




87-1960 
94-2358 
94-2360 





PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



17 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Beach v. Fowler. 



Beach v. Hobbs et al., Hobbs et al. v. Beach 



Beach v. Inman Mfg. Co. 



Beals V. Finkenbiner. 



Beardslee v. Moieslein. 



Beath. 



Beattie. 
Beatty. 



Beatunel. 
Beavis... 



Bechman v. Johnson. 



Bechman v. Southgate. 
Bechman v. Wood 



Bechman v. Wood . 



Bechman v. Wood. 



1889-187 

1890-90 
1894-92 
1894-95 

1899-372 



1896-157 



1898-326 



1889-127 



1904-343 

1879-142 

1891-151 

1893-130 
1894-46 

1891-137 
1879-331 
1881-2 

1889-184 
1890-125 



1897-188 



1899-99 

1899-102 
1899-453 
1899-459 

1899-102 

1899-99 

1899-453 

1899-459 



48-821 



87-1960 

94-2357 
96-2578 

74-379 

69-1067 
87-1961 
94-2359 

82-598 

108-2144 
112-732 
113-l708b 
121-1979 

46-1640 

101-1130 
111-2222 

111-2220 

16-267 
56-1563 



56-1203 
16-1233 



48-673 

92-1236 
97-2531 

123-2309 

81-2087 

85-1738 
87-1397 
87-1398 
100-231 

87-1073 
87-1074 



87-1074 



93 



37 



94, 126, 
142 

56,65.66 
133 
81 
126 



56 
37 

94, 130 
153 

122 



18 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


RutLE 


Bechman v. Wood 

Bechman v. Wood 


1899-453 

1899-99 

1899-102 

1899-459 

1899-459 

1899-99 

1899-102 

1899-453 

1880-54 
1893-135 

1901-246 
1903-277 

1902-249 

1893-95 

1901-198 


89-2459 

90-2295 

93-2320 

95-1454 

87-1073 

87-1074 

94-224 

114-1553 

114-2383 

117-278 

104-1124 

123-2309 

89-2462 

90-2295 

92-2340 

94-224 

95-837 

95-1454 

104-1124 

113-8512 

114-1553 

114-2383 

123-2309 

17-329 

97-2746 
105-1781 
113-2506 

100-451 
64-559 
97-1597 

123.1990 

8-1 
84-1873 

95-1451 
99-1387 

87-1611 

101-1132 

31-1306 

80-347 
80-362b 

39-1326 
99-230 

118-2253 
107-540 


109, 146 
109. 146 


Beck 


17, 19 


Beck 


139 


Beck 


66,68,145 
133 


Beck V. Long 


Becker 


67 


Becker 


33,46 


Becker and Patitz v. Edwards 


143 


Becker v. Throop 


1875-87 

1875-145 
1876-176 

1901-43 

1899-357 
1902-384 
1885-324 

1887-397 


94 


Beckwith 


68 


Bedford et al. v. Duell 

Beecher 


171 


Beecher Mfg. Co. v. The Atwater Mfg. Co . . . 
Beedle v. Bennett 




Beissender v. Roesch 


124 


Belair ! 


1903-426 


41,42 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



19 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Belding Mfg. Co. v. Challenge Com Planter 
Co. 

Bell V. Brooks 



Bell V. Gray. 



Bellows V. King. 



Bender v. Hoffmann. 



Benedict and Morsell 

Benet and Mercie v. McClean. 



Benger v. Burson. 



Benger v. Btirson. 

Benjamin 

Benke 

Bennett 



Bennett.. 
Bennett . 
Benson. , 



Benson and Bennett. 



Benton 

Bering v. Haworth. 



1894-228 

1881-4 

1879-42 
1889-23 
1889-186 

1903-328 



1898-262 



1901-191 



1900-185 



1902-164 

1903-132 

1904-63 

1886-11 

1892-122 

1891-100 
1903-258 
1879-13 
1879-81 

1870-26 
187(MJ5 

1882-3 

1878-84 

1880-166 
1880-210 



67-141 
95-442 

19-290 
97-2978 

15-776 
89-2259 



106.997 

110-310 
110-860 
110-1429 
115-1330 

85-1737 

87-1397 
87-1398 
88-1526 
89-1862 
92-1797 
94-224 
96-^44 
117-1800 

116-874 
97-1595 
106-2018 

93-1917 

105-2060 
108-797 

99-1384 
103-1680 
108-1588 

35-1004 



55-1821 

105-1262 

15-512 



23-341 

14-117 

103-1684 



116 
93,94,153 

122 
122, 124 



179 



142, 143 



101, 114 
134 
42 

49, 66, 
133, 145 

41,42 
41,42 



31,40 
110 



Berg. 



120-903 68,75,171 



20 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Berliner v. Gower 


1879-96 
1898-187 


16-1066 
84r-1729 
95-2064 


94 


Bernard v. Huebel 








Bemardin v. Duell, Com. of Patents 


1899-287 


86-996 

97-1835 
107-836 


. 


Bemardin v. Northall and Seymour, Com. 


1897-327 


78-1740 




of Patents 




87-360 




Bemardin v.'Seymour. Com, of Patents 


1897-428 


79-1190 

86-996 

87-360 




Berrye, Kane'and Stengard v. Hildreth 




122-1722 


122 


Berry v. Fitzsimmons 


1902-163 


99-862 


109. 124 








133 


Berry v. Stockwell 


1876-47 

1872-204 

1876-238 


9-404 


107, 140 


Besant 




116-2631 


133 


Bessemer 


1870-9 

1870-86 

1870-108 

1870-147 








Beswick v. Duell, Com. of Patents 


1900-294 


91-1436 
100-1114 


76, 148 


Beucher 


1903-150 


104^310 


133 


Bigelow 


1878-66 


13-913 






1878-114 






Bigelow 


1878-114 


14-821 


63 


Bigelow V. Com. of Patents 




7-603 


124 


Bigelow V. Com. of Patents 




7-606 


101 


Bicrcrs 


1890-32 


50-1130 




Bingham v. Watkins 


1870-42 
1870-186 






Bingham v. Watkins 

Birdsall and Langrty v. Coolidge 


1870-186 




142 


1876-603 


10-748 








97-556 




Birkhead 


1901-158 


97-749 
100-1329 








Birun 


1874-52 


6-521 


41 




1879-241 
1879-291 


101-2567 





PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



21 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Bischoff 

Bishop '. 


1902-329 
1893-48 

1870-157 

1880-207 

1890-77 
1891-113 

1902-204 
1903-567 

1903-573 


100-2603 
63-153 


23,63 
65, 66 


Bissell & Moore Mfe. Co 


88 


Bissell V. Robert 


51-1618 

99-2769 
104-312 

104-578 

104-581 
114-263 
116-1736 
124-319 

104-580 

106-2292 
109-2173 

124-319 

98-1281 

100-2383 
111-1939 
111-2221 

100-2383 

105-2059 

109-1336 
111-25 
116-595 
118-2253 

113-1703 

102-622 

118-2538 

119-2523 

120-906 

121-1013 

122-2392 

120-1477 
43-113 

3-2 

98-791 

105-500 
116-2009 

63-1201 


93,97,124 


Blackford v. Wilder 




Blackford v. Wilder 


154 


Blackford v. Wilder , 


148 


Blackford v. Wilder 


96, 122 


Blackman v. Alexander , , . , . 


1902-41 
1902-323 

1902-323 
1902-41 

1903-288 

1903-521 
1903-23 


124, 127 


Blackmail v. Alexander 


159 


■RIacVnnan v, Alexander. x , - - 


123, 143 


Blackman v. Alexander 


40,110 
86 


Blackmore 


Blackmore v. Hall 


116. 124 


Blackmore v. Hall 




122, 124 


Blackmore v. Hall 




124 


Blair 


1888-16 
1890-11 

1873-6 
1902-25 

1893-72 




Blake 


171 


Blakeman 




Blakeslee 


165 



22 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Blanchard . 



Blanchard v. Strain . 

Bland 

Bland. 

Blessing 

BUck 

Blinn v. Gale 



Bliss V Creveling. 

Bloch & Co 

Blood V. Brown... 



Blue V. Power v. Owen. 
Blythe 



Blythe. 



Boehm&Co. 



Bolado. 
Bogart . 



Bohlecke. 



Bond 

Bonna 

Boon V. Hinman. 



1870-69 

1871-181 

1872-198 

1880-217 

1880-218 

1870-54 
1870-93 

1879-40 

1879-104 

1896-9 



1879-174 
1879-228 

1904-381 

1887-54 
1890-134 

1903-224 

1902-425 

1884-82 

1887-107 
1887-115 
1888-54(S 
1889-134 
1889-13S 
1890-23 

1885-82 

1887-107 
1887-115 
1889-134 
1889-135 
1890-23 

1875-103 

1893-80 

1876-165 

1880-15G 

1901-23S 



1869-17 

1890-12( 

1870-7 



37-iOO 

15-828 

16-47 

71-1027 
119-963 

16-469 
117-2489 

112-499 
111-2489 

40-443 
87-1958 

105-495 
105-976 

101-2076 
30-1321 
88-546 



30-1321 
88-546 



8-319 
85-147 

63-1961 
10-113 

97-2743 
101-1132 



37 



140 

37 

94,95 
142, 171 
171 
122 

113 



122 
34,41,145 



52-761 



47 
37.41 

172 

24 
75 
94 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



23 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Booth. 

Booth. 
Booth. 

Booth. 



Booth, Booth and Flynt v. Hanan, Gates 
V. Marshall 

Booth V. Lyman 



1889-242 
1891-107 

18W-107 
1902-361 

1904-558 



Booth V. L3rman. 



Borgfeldt. 
Borton. . . 
Borton. . . 
Borton. . . 
Botzky. . . 
Boucher. . 



Boulton V. lUingworth. 



Bourn v. Hill Jr. . . 

Bourne 

Bowditch V. Todd. 

Bowen v Bradley. 

Bowers 

Bowker v. Dows. . 



Bowles. . . 
Bowman. 
Bowman.. 



1880-62 
1890-36 

1880-151 
1880-183 
1880-62 

1889-199 
1896-99 
1897-209 
1903-153 



1899-133 



1888-32 



1904-247 
1904-416 

1891-163 

1879-276 
1879-406 
1880-664 

1903-96 
1894-26 
1904-620 



49-1841 

66-141 
101-219 
107-1972 

113-2216 

123-319 
17-393 



18-132 



49-132 

77-2137 

81-800 

104-851 

121-338 

88-546 

8S^706 
91-^59 
91-1615 
95-2063 
100-1978 

43-508 

79-511 

94-2979 

114-1551 

120-1284 
110-2610 
112-1477 
112-1474 

66-1707 
106-997 

16-1004 

16-510 

80-658 

103-429 

66-1310 
113-1703 



127, 132 



132 



66,66,68 

171 
122 

114, 116 
118, 163 

114. 164 



6, 43. 61 

209 

209 

142 

171 

41 



113 



96,97,98 
139, 142 
154, 156 



17 



68, 171 

85 

60 



24 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Boyden Power Brake Co. v. Westinghouse 

Boyden Power Brake Co. v. Westing- 
house 



1898-443 



Boyer. 
Boyer. 



Boynton. 



Bradford and Hood . 
Bradford v. Corbin.. 



Brainard v. Cramme. 



Brand. 
Brand. 



Brand. 



Brandsville Fruit fsLrm Co. 



Branna 

Breul V. Smith. 

Breul V. Smith. 



1870-130 
1870-147 

1889-249 
1890-112 
1896-96 

1870-126 
1871-191 



1874-80 

1882-382 
1889-117 

1891-134 
1898-12 



1898-62 



1903-103 



1901-232 
1897-3 

1897-332 



Breul V. Smith - 1898-124 



83-1067 

87-700 

87-1962 

94-1788 

96-2579 

99-232 



49-1985 



123-1283 

6-292 

89-921 

22-769 

56-1062 

82-893 

83-1208 
83-1513 
97-1598 

83-747 

84-311 
89-2068 

103-660 

118-1938 

122-356 

122-3011 

97-2533 
78-1904 
86-1635 

78-1906 

85-151 

86-1635 

87^98 

87-891 

87-893 

92-1038 

84-809 
84-1728 
86-490 
86>491 



75,94.133 



198. 204 



164, 165 



46 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



25 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Brevil V. Smith 


1899-44 


86-1635 

78-1904 

82-384 

88-2409 

89-1342 

89-1862 

96-844 

116-2010 

123-323 
75-1854 
87-1077 

104-1119 

105-2061 
109-1337 

87-1077 

116-871 

116-1181 
123-655 

78-169 

87^93 
87-894 
88-718 

20-891 
87-^98 

99-2319 

9^2587 

99-2966 

101-2821 

103-890 

104-2148 

96-641 
99-2966 

107-1097 

116-298 

96-1430 

97-958 
97-2982 

100-3011 
103-2173 




Brewer. Til v. Rehftis and Rehfus v. 


124 


Demerel 
Briede 




41, 42. 85 


Brifirsrs 


1896-17 
1897-211 

1903-158 

1899-325 

1896-17 
1879-211 


133 


Brififfifs V. Conlev 


124 


Briggs V. Duell, Com. of Patents 




Briggs V. Lillie v. Cooke v. Jones and Tylor. 
Briggs V. Se3rmour, Com. of Patents 

Brigham 


68 


1897-211 

1881-38 

1902-189 
1902-110 
1902-220 

1901-67 
1903-459 




Brill 


41,42 


Brill and Adams » 


209 


Brill and Adams v. Webelacker 


4, 97, 154 


Brill and Brill v. Hunter 


159 


Brisbane 


65, 133, 


Britt 


145 
43 


Broderick 


1901-107 
1902-341 




Broderick and Bascom Rope Co. v. A. 
Leschen & Sons* Rope Co 





26 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



RUEL 



Bronson Co 

Brookfield and Hemingray v. Brooke 

Brooks 

Brooks V. Foote v. Wenk 

Brooks V. Hillard 

Brough 

Brough V. Snyder 

Brower 



Brown 

Brown 

Brown 

Brown 

Brown 

Brown 

Brown and Seavey v. Piper. 



Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer. 



Brown v. Cutler v. Keeney. 

Brown v. Hodgkinson 

Brown v. Keeney 

Brown v. Lindmark 



Brown v The District of Columbia. 



1899-115 

1873-107 

1889-185 
1889-250 

1874-84 

1904-223 

1903-335 

1904-29 

1901-3 

1873-151 

1878-63 



1870-45 

1893-64 

1902-191 

1903-418 

1904^60 

1905- 

1876-464 

1877-50 

1891-346 
1893-91 



1903-182 



1903-211 
1904-93 



1889-398 
1894-105 



87-1782 
89-2070 



4-81 



6-296 

108-287 

106-1237 

108-564 

94-221 

4-450 

38-104 

80-1126 

81-969 

82-337 

83-747 

83-1993 

84-11 

89-2068 

98-230 



63-759 

99-2320 

107-269 

108.1052 

115-248 

10-417 

87-1610 

55-287 

83-1993 

85-288 

87-179 

87-1783 

88-388 

89-2069 

91-1617 

95-230 

97-2084 

104-1896 

123-2973 

105-260 

109-1071 

104-310 
106-995 

47-398 



94 



110, 113 
157 - 
65.66,110 
31 

114,116 
119 



24 

167 

41,42 

68, 142 

41,42 

15 



113 
126 
113 
122 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



27 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Brown v. La Dow 


1880-199 


18-1049 


124, 126 


Browne v. Ludlow 


1870-16 




139, 146 




1870-33 
1870-130 






Browne v. Stroud 




122-2689 
94-988 
98-2173 


122, 163 


Brownell ^ . . 


1901-30 


41,66 






Brownlie 


1872-208 
1903-189 


3-212 
104-2148 


37,66 


Brunker v, Schweigerer 


143 


Brunner 


1872-62 
1891-477 


1-303 
66-1334 


139 


Brush Electric Co. v. The Electrical Ac- 




cumulator Company 




120-2446 




Bryant, Wolcott and Davidson 




121-2663 


96 


Bryant 


1902-334 


100-2773 


6 


Bryant 


1896-66 


76-461 


86 


Bryon v. Henry 


1903-178 


104-1896 


116, 119 








121, 124 


Bryon v. Maxwell 


1903-230 


106-499 


76, 124 


Buchanan 


1879-288 
1891-104 


lfr-1049 

66-140 

89-706 


133 


Buchanan 


26 






Buck 


1900-6 

1904-613 

1884-4 

1886-10 
1890-64 


94-222 

113-1418 

26-437 


68. 142 


Buck 


179 


Buell 


63 






Buerk v. Imhaeuser 


1876-614 
1880-139 


10-907 








Buffalo Pitts. Co. v. Duell. Com. of Patents 


1900-397 


93-1491 
107-1974 




Bullard 


1888-169 


46-1669 

83-593 

88-2066 

98-2364 








Bullier 


1899-166 

btt mil 


88-1161 
113-2508 


77 







28 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Bullier v. Willson. 



Bundy v. Rmnbarger. 

Btindy v. Riimbarger. 
Bundy v. Rmnbarger . 



Btirdick . 
Burgess. , 



Burgess v. Wetmore. 

■Bumham 

Burr V. Ford 



Burrell v. Hackley. 



Burrowes. 
Burrows. . 



Burschik. 
Burson.. . 



Bxirson.. 

Burt 

Burt Co. 



1899-66 



1900-94 

1900-142 
1900-143 

1900-142 
1900-94 

1900-143 
1900-94 



1901-184 
1897-64 



1879-237 
1872-26 
1895-120 



1888-487 

1902-250 
1904-165 



1892-53 

1897-196 
1889-251 
1901-108 



87-180 

87-^95 

87-696 

87-1607 

87-1608 

89-353 

92-2339 

92-2340 

95-233 

91-2210 



92-2001 



92-2002 

96-1037 
96-1038 
108-799 

97-1373 

80-1769 

82-1692 

84 1281 

84-1282 

85-289 

85-2096 

86-492 

87-514 

88-1161 

16-765 

1-164 

70-275 

79-155 
87-2121 

44-1400 
86-1324 

100-452 
110-599 

119-1258 

58-1414 

106-2291 

81-2246 
49-1986 
96-1430 
97-1597 



110, 114 

115, 117 
156 

116, 153 



116, 153 
122 



83,84 
41,42 



125 
66 



42 

68. 139 
142 
50 
70 

65,68,171 
65,70.133 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



29 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Btirt V. Evory 


1890-245 


50-1294 
78-2049 




Burton v. Bentley 


1899-393 


87-2326 
98-226 


149 


Burton v. The Town of Greenville 


1880-602 


o4— o^y 
21-1111 


24,66 


Bury V. Thompson 


1892-42 


5S-1255 


126 


Busenbenz , 




117-600 
10-164 


171 


Bush & Co 


1876-168 






1879-222 


83-1513 




Bushia v. Phelps and Edmtinds 


1876-119 


9-1010 






1889-38 


30-1092 




Busky 


1902-111 


98-2588 
101-1834 




Btissey and McLeod v. Wager, Bussey and 


1876-301 


9-300 




McLeod V. Hicks and Wolfe. 


1871-216 






Bustin 


1902-285 


100-1111 


41 


Butcher 


1904-60 


108-1587 
108-1588 


41.42,70 


Butte City St. Ry. Co. v. Pacific Cable 


1894-209 


66-1760 




Ry.Co. 




95-443 




Butterworth, Com. of Patents v. Hill 


1885-292 


31-1043 
107-836 




Butterworth, Com. of Patents, v. The 


1884-429 


29-615 




United States 


1884-194 

1888-59 

1890-192 

1891-175 

1892-124 

1896-116 


78-1741 

79-509 

79-1191 

79-1193 

79-1368 

86-800 

86-917 

87-359 

96-116 




Butterworth v Boral and Kymer v. Ecob. . . 


1901-193 


97-1596 
103-660 
104-1120 


158 


Bymes 


1901-152 


97-191 
98-2171 


65,66 


B3rron v. Weston Co 


1902-149 


99-861 
110-309 




CahiU 


1893-78 


63-1816 


37,65.66 




1894-2 


92-1797 
101-1832 





30 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



Cahn V. Wong Town On. 
Cain V. Park 



Caldwell and Barr 

Calhoim v. Hodgson. 



Callahan. 
Calm 



Calm V. DoUey v. Finzelberg and Schmidt. 



Calm V. Schweinitz v. Dolley v. Geisler. 
Camel Co 



Cameron and Everett v. Brick. 



Cammett v. Hallett . 
Cammett v. Hallett. 



Campbell 

Campbell 

Campbell 

Campbell v. Brown. 
Campbell v. James. . 



CD. 



Campbell v. The Mayor, etc., of New York . . 



1884-179 
1890-11 

1899-278 



1895-122 

1890-24 
1899-105 

1898-194 



1899-40 



1904-5 



1871-89 

1880-85 

1880-182 

1880-165 

1900-176 
1901-94 



1872-228 
1878-88 



1891-154 
1880-633 
1880-207 

1888-492 
1895-65 



O. G. 



Rule 



27-299 



86-797 

83-45 

83-113 

90-226 

92-797 

96-1038 

106-543 

106-599 

106-2018 

108-799 

110-859 

112-1479 

114-1265 

116-1736 

120-2126 

70-276 

123-999 

60-990 

87-1397 

97-192 

84-1869 
86-1634 
87-1397 
87-1398 

86-1633 
87-1398 

108-288 
111-2223 



18-796 



93-939 
96-1237 
105-744 

2-644 
14-83 
116-1462 
66-1666 
18-979 
21-337 

46-346 



37 



133, 136 



122, 127 



24 

37 

71 

126 

22 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



31 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Cannon. , 
Cantrell. 



Capital City Dairy Co 

Capital Paper Co 

Carborimdum Company. 
Card and Card 



1901-263 
1886-207 
1896-106 



1898-607 



1900-73 



Cardwell 

Carey v. Eiseman and Misar 

Carey v. The New Home Sewing Machine 

Co. 
Carlock 



1904-383 



1878-124 



Carmichael v. Fox. 



Carnegie Steel Co., Limited, v. The Cam- 
bria Iron Co. 

Camell v. Glasgow v. Cook 

Carney v. Latimer 

Carpenter 



1901-165 

1875-88 

1875-150 
1876-118 

1903-177 



1902-592 



Carpenter. 



Carr. 



Carr 

Carr v. Davids. 



1904-235 

1904-669 

1874-11 
1874-57 

1894-11 
1873-79 
1876-224 
1870-185 



Carroll 

Carroll v. Morse. 



1876-61 
1876-176 



94-2165 

35-871 

71^1030 
87-1959 
92-1233 

83-295 
114-973 

91-1616 
97-2085 

121-2250 
121-2327 

112-499 
112-500 

15-293 

122-2063 

97-1171 

8-191 



104-1656 
116-1451 

99-1870 

120-901 
119-652 
110-2233 
114-260 

112-503 
120-2446 

5-30 



66-653 
3-440 



115-510 
9-453 



81 



Carroll v. Stahlberg. 



1904-331 111-1937 



75,96 

41 

122 

93 

95 



123, 124 
146 

66 

124 
122 



37 



41,42 



165 
94 

113, 122 



32 



PRACTICE IN THE U, S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Carson v. Ury. 



Carter. 
Carter. 



Carter and Dwyer v. Perry and Dickey . 



Carty. 



Carty v. Kellogg. 
Carty v. Kellogg. 



Carver v. McCanna. . . . 
Cary Mfg. Co. v. Neal. 



Casalonga 

Case V. Hastings. 



Casilear & Mclntire. 
Casler 



easier 

Casselman . 
Cauhape. . . 
Catisen. . . . 
Cavanagh. . 



Cazin 

Cazin v. Von Welsback. 



Celluloid Mfg. Co. v. Arlington Mfg. Co . 



1889-617 

1879-243 
188^100 



1875-111 

1876-44 
1876-214 

1888-98 

1895-83 
1896-188 

1896-188 
1895-83 



1900-235 

1903-212 
1875-37 
1876-48 
1875-117 

1900-5 
1902-292 



1880-52 

1899-183 

1902-113 



1893-483 



.49-411 
86-1804 

16-809 

46-1391 

83-593 
98-2364 

8-518 



44-570 
90-1950 

73-285 
102-1297 

74^657 

95-838 
109-2171 
111-1035 

117-599 
90-1950 
116-1185 

105-261 
7-557 

8-474 

90-446 

92-1236 
98-2362 

100-1330 

116-2012 

17-327 

88-2242 

98-2588 

98-2589 

120-660 

119-650 



64-1263 
87-2121 



50 
42 
133 

28,41,126 



122, 126 



29,77 
37 

93,94 

126,171 

37.42 



37,68 

68 

41 

19 

41,42 

17, 171 
97, 108 
122, 124 
128, 153 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



33 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Celluloid Mfg. Co. v. AUonite Mfg. Co. 



Celluloid Mfg. Co. v. Comstock and Cheney 
Co. 

C^luloid Mfg. Co. V. The Goodyear Dental 
Vulcanite Co. 



Chadwick 

Chamberlain . 
Chamberlain . 



Chambers. 
Chambers. 



Chambers and Mendham v. Duncan, Wil- 
son and Lauder 

Chambers and Mendham v. Duncan, Wil- 
son and Lauder 



Chambers and Mendham v. Tucker et al 

Chamblant 

Champ 

Champ 



1887-671 



1886-403 
1894-104 

1876-419 

1891-169 
1874-111 
1902-354 

1873-66 
1890-101 



1876-82 

1876-223 
1876-186 

1876-223 

1876-82 

1879-186 

1881-10 

1881-40 

1877-32 

1873-119 

1906- 



Chapman 

Chapman 

Chapman v. Morrison 

Chapot-Shirlaw Co 

Charles, Prince De Loewenstein. 



188^72 



Charlton 

Charlton v. Sheldon. 

Chase 

Chase v. Ryder 



Chase and White v. Chase. 



1875-147 
1904r-24 

1903-159 
1904-362 
1879-246 
1892-219 
1894-45 

1873-99 

1876-72 

1876-110 

1879-34 

1880-153 



41-693 

78-1431 
83-1993 
84-807 

36-1356 



10-41 
23-1222 

57-124 
6-644 
101-447 
105-1781 

3-320 
51-1943 
91-460 

9-741 

21-1876 
23-1831 

10-787 
79-511 



11-1009 

4r-106 

114-1827 
120-1827 
120-2127 

29-950 
120-2446 
8-1031 
121-2327 
108-662 
108-2146 

104-1120 

111-2492 

16-809 

61-885 

4-4 



35,36 

41 

41,77 

22 

41,42 

146. 169 



122 
133 
34 



172 

37, 133 
159 
209 
31.40 

199 
110 
49 
5.6,25,26 

28 



34 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



C.G. 



O. D. 



Rule 



Chatillon. 



Chesebrough. 



Chesebrough v. Toppan 

Cheneau v. Com. of Patents. 



Chemey v. Clauss 

Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. Sayles. 



Chillings worth. 



China & Japan Trading Co., Ltd. 
Chimey v. Clauss 



Christensen 

Christensen 

Christensen v. Ellis. 



Christensen v. Ellis. 



.Christensen v. McKenzie. 
Christensen v. Noyes 



Christensen v. Noyes. 



1872-161 



186^18 

1869-109 

1870-45 

1880-69 

1872-100 
1895-188 



1879-349 

1879-80 
1880-118 



1897-72 



1900-157 



1900-129 
1903-256 
1901-326 



1900-201 
1900-212 



1900-212 
1900-201 



2-115 
6-837 



1-464 
70-924 
80-965 

115-2137 

16-243 

35-1004 
80-362 
89-2464 
104-1124 
114-1144 
115-1067 
117-278 
117-2086 

80-1892 

88-2066 
89-521 

92-2508 
103-891 

114-2137 
123-1285 

92-1619 
105-1261 

94-2561 
113-1145 
123-2312 

120-2444 
113-1145 

117-277 
90-223 
92-1235 
106-1777 
106-2018 
109-1605 
109-1607 
110-858 
114-766 

90-227 
110-858 
110-2015 
114-766 



24,66,76 
139 



93,94,llg 



97 



6, 6, 26 



113 



139 
41,42.70 



121 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



35 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Christie v. Seybold. 
Christie v. Seybold. 



1891-18 

1895-49 
1896-98 

1893-515 

1895-49 
1895-50 

Chubb 1872-224 

Churchward v. Douglas v. Cutler. 1903-389 



Cirkel and Killing v. Killing. 
Claasen v, Steffen 



1898-249 



Clark 

Clark 

Clark-Jewell- Wells Co 

Clark Pomace Holder Co. v. Ferguson 

Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co. . . 



Clark V. Broad 

Clark V. Lord v. Grimes. 

Clark V. Wooster 



Clarke. 



Clarke. 
Clarke. 



Clarke, Trustee v. Johnson. 
Clarke v. Johnson 



Clay. 
Clay. 



1904-573 



1898-608 

1883-399 
1890-132 

1891-449 

1891-217 
1890-100 
1891-240 

1886-548 



1884-16 
1890-64 
1890-187 

1886-18 
1892-208 

1880-673 
1880-513 

1880-513 
1880-675 

1901-256 
1902-449 
1874-52 
1900-197 



54-957 



64^1650 

88-1528 
106-1507 
106-2014 

2-519 
106-2016 
116-1185 

85-1224 
101-1370 

113-2507 
113-2508 
109.2169 
115-250 
83-915 
103-B91 

24-1090 



56-595 
80-360 

57-1426 
51-1943 

37-1477 
99-230 

26-824 



36-120 
61-286 
96-2410 

18-1276 



17-1401 

97-2980 
101-2567 



34 
109, 123 



6,108,154 

50,64 
198 



171 
107, 108 



18 
171 



70 
41 



36 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



:i 



Clement v. Richards v. Meissner. 

Clement v. Richards v. Meissner. 

Clement v. Richards v. Meissner. 
Clemson v. Fowler 



Cleret v. Rehfuss. 



Clifford 

Clinton and Klnowlton. 



Clough V. The Gilbert & Barker Mfg. Co . . . 



Clough V. The Gilbert & Barker Mfg. Co . , 



Cluett, Peabody & Company. 



Clunes. 
Coats. . 



Cobb. 
Cobb. 
Cobb. 



Cochran. 



CD. 



1904-319 

1904-321 

1904-492 
1886-35 

1896-469 

1893-9 

1876-30 

1876-102 
1876-161 

1882-523 
1882-532 



1882-532 
1882-523 



1879-204 

1874-60 
1889-139 

1879-123 
1880-3 

1904-136 



1869-30 

1869-33 

1869-58 

1869-70 

1870-26 

1870-65 

1870-152 

1871-147 

1871-14 

1871-15 

1872-188 

1876-17 

1876-22 



O. G. 



111-1626 
111-1627 

111-1627 
111-1626 

113-1143 
37-671 

76-336 
79-1522 

62-316 
9-249 



22-2137 

80-362a 
92-1038 
96-2583 

22-2241 

80-362a 
96-2583 

121-902 
121-2327 

123-2631 
16-644 
86-1986 

6-751 
16-176 



103-1913 
109-1069 



35-873 



Rule 



142, 149 



110 

113,|123 

163 



66 
41 



148 



37 



41, 48, 
107, 125 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



37 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Cochrane. 



Cochran. 



Cochrane v. Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik 



Cochrane, Warder, Mason and Cox v 
Deener, Cissell and Welch 

Coe 

Coe 

Coffee V. Guerrant 



Coggin, Kidder & Co 

Cohansey Glass Mfg. Co. v. Wharton. 



Cohn V. The U. S. Corset Co., Lane and 
Lyall 

Cole 



Cole Company. 
Cole V. Loud.. 



1869-60 

1869-91 

1870-54 

1870-104 

1871-48 

1873-80 

1876-222 

1879-186 

1871-78 
1872-207 

1884-230 
1889-139 



1877-242 

1878-82 
1879-200 

1889-191 
1897-187 



1894-384 
1896-45 



1877-26 
1879-222 

1886-296 

1877-205 
1877-74 

1903-237 

1893-138 

1870-4 

1870-17 
1870-130 



Cole V Zarbock v. Greene. 



Coleman v. Struble. 
Coleman 



1880-205 



27-813 

79-685 
79-689 

11-687 
94-1787 

48-1119 

81-2086 

83-748 
83-1513 

68-279 

86-1326 
88-1161 
94-1188 
94-1970 
95-234 
95-1648 
110-1170 
112-1482 

11-1169 



36-343 
87-2121 

11-457 

105-744 
65-1915 



116-1451 

114-973 
18-1051 



66 



125 



41,42 
81, 133 



46 
201 



123, 142 
144 

122, 124 
63,88,133 



38 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



: '. 



TITLE 

Coleman 

Colgate V. The Western Union Telegraph 
Co. 

Colhoun V. Hodgson 

Collamore and Kerst 

Collender 

Collender v, Griffith 

Collender v. Griffith 

Collender v. Griffith 

CoUey V. Copenhaven 

Collins 

Collins 

Collins 

Collins Co 

Collis * 

Colton 

Colton 

Coltimbia Mill Co. v. Alcorn 



CD. 



1903-486 
1878-440 
1881-45 

1895-122 



1903-241 
1872-217 
1873-B4 

1873-14 
1873-43 

1873-43 
1873-14 

1880-678 



1903-415 

1890-27 
1892-193 

1901-181 
1902-324 
1872-261 
1875-66 

1890-27 
1892-193 

1902-436 
1903-166 

1893-672 

1895-66 
1895-67 



O. G. 



107-1662 
14-943 



70-276 

87-1399 
87-1400 

106-746 
2-360 
21-1111 

3-91 



3-267 



18-241 

21-1111 
42-293 

107-268 
60-992 



97-1372 

100-2601 

2-617 

60-992 

101-2285 
104-1119 
116-1681 

65-1916 

83-1993 
86-1324 
87-1783 
89-2070 
91-230 
91-320 
95-230 
96-425 
96-1036 
99-2321 
100-684 
113-1420 



Rule 



12 



42 
24 

93 

93,94 



107, 122 
126, 130 
68 

17, 172 
6,6,20 
37 



24 
62, 145 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



39 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Combs 


1871-209 

1872-244 

1875-61 

1875-106 

1875-153 

1880-105 




. 41, 63 








Comkin 


1898-85 


83-1660 
94-583 




Commercial Mfg. Co. v. Fairbanks 


1886-409 


36-1473 




Camiing Co. 








Commercial Mfg. Co. v. Fairbanks 


1890-319 


51-965 




Canning Co. 




87-1785 




Computing Scale Company of America v. 
The Automatic Scale Co. 




119-1586 






120-2446 




Condict 


1900-165 


93-551 
98-2365 








Connell 


1903-495 
1904-228 
1892-102 


107-2235 

110-2015 

59-787 


30,31,207 


Connell v. Tobey 


109 


Connelly 


41,42 




1893-121 


98-2364 




Connor v. William 


1878-137 


15-387 


110, 118 




142, 159 


Consolidated Bimging Apparatus Co. v. 


1887-209 


38-1015 




Woerle 




80-360 




Consolidated Electric Light Co. v. The 


1888-452 


44-110 




McKeesport Light Co. 


1891-114 






Consolidated Electric Light Co. v. The 


1889-657 


49-1536 




McKeesport Light Co. 


1892-54 
1890-184 






Consolidated Fruit Tar Co .* 


1878-101 


14-260 




^^^^ AAU^^ AA ^* %m W^^Vfc ^ A V»* W 1 i^>* ^i^^i^ •••••••••• •■•••• 




81-802 
IW olio 




Consolidated Safety Valve Co. v. The 


1885-180 


30-991 




Crosby Steam Gage & Valve Co. 




80-362 
96-2583 




Continental Windmill Co 


1870-74 
1872-152 




. 37 


^^^y AJi VA AA^AA V»«p* VT AAA^AAAAAXA ^^\^ • •••••••• • • •••••• 






Cook 


1871-24 
1871-201 










Cook 


1890-81 


51-1620 
84-1281 


6, 37, 51 







40 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Cook 


1892-232 
1900-19 


61-1480 
94-585 
116-1181 
116-871 

58-946 

30-889 

96-2578 

96-2579 

99-669 

65-1066 

117-2035 

51-622 
95-230 

48-397 

122-2063 

50-929 

1-573 

99-2547 
110-306 
114-260 
116-597 
118-1069 

115-1328 
1-436 

110-1431 
115-252 
118-589 
118-^834 

101-1607 
112-1480 
968-2061 


48 


Cook 


70 


Cooke V. Tones and Tavlor 




Coon 


1892-32 
1893-17 

1885-171 

1902-147 
1893-612 

1890-295 

1889-17 
1889-252 




Coon V. Wilson 




Cooper 


54 


Corbin Cabinet Lock Co. x. Eagle Lock Co. 
Corbin v. Gould 




Cordrey 


68 


Corey v. Eiseman and Misar 


109 


Cornelius 


1891-124 
1872-120 
1872-150 

1902.195 
1904-144 

1872-93 

1879-163 

1876-65 

1877-74 

1880-144 

1904-650 

1902-395 

1904-424 

1901-125 

1869-78 

1893-135 

1879-194 

1902-257 
1900-197 

1873-4 
1875-108 


78 


Cornell 


37 


Corrv and Barker v. Trout 


129 


Corry and Barker v Trout v. McDermott 

Cory, Gibhart and Martin Jr. v. Blakey 

Cottrell 


127. 132 

122. 125 
24 


Cottrell 




Couch V. Bamett 




Coulson V. Callender and Callender 

Couper and Somers v. Bannister 


77.96 
125. 162 


Courville 


134 


Covel V. Maxim and Radlev 


142 


Cowles 


65-2060 

16-499 

40-917 

100-681 
3-2 


87 


Cowper 


37,41 


Cowoer and Coles 


41 


Cox 









PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



41 



TITLE 



CD. 



O.rG. 



Rule 



Cox 

Cramer and Haak. 

Crandall 

Crane 



Crane 

Crane v. Meriam. . 
Crane and Rogers. 



Crane v. Whitehead and Atherton. 
Crawford and Lechtenstein 



Creamer and Hoalk .... 
Creamer and Knowlton. 

Crecelius 

Crecelius 

Crescent Mfg. Co 



Cresler 

Creveling. 



Crocker v. Allderdice. 



1902-352 

1886-5 

1869-7 

1869-105 

1869-106 

1878-129 

1903-332 

1890-92 

1871-230 

1875-26 

1876-135 

1892-230 



1904-295 



1901-160 



Crompton 

Croskey v. Atterbury 
Croskey v. Atterbury 

Cross V. Phillips 



1904-353 
1898-167 



1876-35 

1877-62 

1881^8 

1896-9 

1896-437 

1896-437 



1899-342 



122-1046 

101-220 

35-625 

4-691 
42-295 
98-229 

106-999 
51-1783 



40-345 

7-219 

61-1480 

107--835 

118-1068 

111-1040 

115-1849 

116-2531 

97-750 

100-1329 

108-1869 

111-2489 

112-499 

84-1434 

86-184 

87-1785 

92-2508 

93-1123 

97-1374 

9-5 
42-1061 

75-1359 
102-1297 
76-163 
84-1143 
88-1159 
106-768 
109-2171 
87-1399 
88-1399 
89-354 
100-1566 
113-1143 
114-1832 
114-2384 
115-805 
115-806 
117-1496 
123-999 
123-2313 



68 

41,42 

49,56 



6,39 
41,42,93 



30 



96 

41,42 
50 
68 



50 



171 



42 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Crouch. 



Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Aleeminxim Stop- 
per Co. 

Cruikshank v. Strong 

Ctimmins 

Ctinningham 



Cunningham 

Ciutice Bros. Co. 
Curtis 



Curtis. 



Curtis 

Curtiss 

Curtis V. Marsh. 



Cushing 

Cushman v. Lines. 

Cushman v. Lines. 



Cushman v. Parham. 



Cutler 

Cutler V. Riddell.... 
Cutten and Fraser. . . 
Cutting V. Kaylor. . . 
Dahlgren v. Crocker. 

Dahne 

Dailey 

Dailey 

Dailey v. Jones 



Dallas 

Dalsimer & Sons. 



1891-196 
1901-450 
1880-102 



1902-442 

1903-524 

1898-660 

1890-206 

1892-5 

1892-6 

1891-206 

1892-5 

1892-6 

1901-147 
1903-232 
1900-127 

1902-266 
1896-62 

1897-346 



1876-130 



1903-310 

1902-81 

1872-266 

1902-107 

1876-66 

1878-3 

1902-472 

1894r-71 

1896-59 

1903-326 
1898-640 



67-845 

79-2196 

96-2673 

105-1259 

17-611 
114-2090 
101-2288 
102-824 
102-824 
101-2288 
86-610 
86-161 

67-1128 



67-1128 



97-189 
105-600 
92-1236 
97-2531 

100-681 
77-163 
79-335 

78-2061 

79-335 

87-893 

92-1038 

95-1454 

9-1108 
30-1092 

123-665 
106-763 

98-2172 
2-704 

98-2686 
7-1096 

13-228 
101-2825 

67-1719 

88-1159 

106-996 
85-149 
89-2070 



66.66 

60,88 

171 
6.126 



41,42 



96 
68 

107. 125 
130,213 

41,42 



39,40 

37.94 
122 
142 
113 
6,110.113 
37 

37,41 
170 



41 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



43 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Dalton V- HoDkins v. Neuman 




121-2666 
9-198 

13-4 
47-811 

74-500 
79-1521 

103-2174 

112-727 

114-764 

110-1427 
110-201S 

110-2017 

110-1427 

15-94 

86-1497 

97-750 

93-191 
120-2753 
105-1783 
9-351 

100-452 

109-1068 

101-1369 

87-516 

94-986 

94-1188 

123-1991 

112-1211 
103-227 
103-1679 
118-837 

104-2440 
114-1551 
114-1552 

114-1549 


154 


Dana v Greenleaf and Ahams 


1876-9 
1876-108 
1876-135 
1880-69 

1878-26 

1889-150 

1889-162 

1896-176 
1903-50 

1904-196 
1904-653 
1879-107 

1900-163 


76 


Daniels v. Chesterman 


88, 107 


Daniels v. Morgan 


144 


Dashiell v. Grosvenor 




Dashiell v. Tasker 

Davenport 

Davenport 




Davids & Co 




Davidson ......... 1 r , - 1 


133 


Davidson 


76, 133 


Davies 


1903-280 

1876-43 

1880-89 

1902-251 

1904-85 

1902-388 

1899-79 


41,42 


Davies v. Hartman 




Davin 

Davis 


4,37,50,51 
41, 133 


Davis V- Codv 


4,102,154 


Davis V- Forsvth and Forsvth 




Davis V. Garrett 


15.30 


Davis V. Garrett 


1904-578 

1903-79 

1903-130 

1903-198 


31,75 
105, 106 
108, 110 
148 
108 


Davis V. OcumDaufirh v. Garrett 


142 


Davis V. OcumDaucfh v. Garrett 


75.76.96 


Davis V. Ocumpaugh v. Garrett 


101. 105 
108, 109 
113 


Davis v. Resch Temperature Controlling 
Co. 


15 







44 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Davis V. Swift 


1901-134 

1902-392 

1872-12 

1872-219 
1872-252 

1903-279 

1901-157 

1904-330 

1888-66 

1890-46 

1890-47 

1896-106 
1881-413 
1893-401 

1894-672 
1895-314 

1900-162 
1890-114 

1904-120 

1888-3 
1890-51 

1893-181 


96-2409 
115-1328 

101-1371 
1-27 

105-1782 
97-552 

111-1937 
43-1583 

77-2140 

84-811 

93-191 

20-1233 

96-492 

97-1176 

63-1963 
83-745 
106-543 
108-799 
110-858 
114-1265 

69-1641 
86-800 
94-1970 
97-1838 

93-190 
52-457 
83-1511 

109-1885 
115-248 

42-95 

62-741 

93-191 

114-2091 

124-626 
96-1240 
97-1600 
97-2981 


122 


Davison 


41 


Dawes and Fanninsr 




Day 


68 


■*^"'j' 

Davton Fan & Motor Co 


15 


Deane 


41,42 


De Bausset 




Decker v Looselv 


25, 171 


Dederick v. Cassell 


Dederick v. Fox 




Deering v. Winona Harvester Works 

Deeter 


25, 167 


De Ferranti v. Westincrhouse Tr 




Deitsch 




De la Sala, Paster Perez 


41 


De La Vergne Refrigerating Machine Co. 
V. Featherstone 




Delavoye 


65,66 


Delbey 


1901-103 

1870-128 

1873-100 

1876-71 

1876-72 

1876-109 

1880-153 




De Lill v. Averv and De LiU 


28 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



45 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Demeny. . 
Demming. 



Denton v. Com. of Patents. . . 
Denton and Denton v. Riker. 



Deprez and Carpentier v. Bernstein v. 

Hunter v. Gaulard and Gibbs 
Derby 



Dermody v. Pennock. 



Deryea and White v. Rice. 

Designolle , 

Devlin v. Pajmter 



De Wallace v. Scott. 



Dewar& Sons. 



Dewey v. Colby. 



Dey, etc. v. Richards v. Meissner. 
Diamond Ink Co 



Dickinson v Hildreth 

Dickinson v. Norris 

Dickinson v. Thibodeau v. Hildreth. 
Dickson v. Kinsman 



Dickson v. Kinsman. 



1893-125 
1893-131 

1884-18 
1887-71 
1887-79 
1890-56 

1889-483 

1902-15 

1891-53 

1892-59 

1884-21 

1887-62 

1889-235 

1890-11 

1878-93 

1878-110 

1878-111 



1878-10 
1894-656 

1899-416 

1902-38 

1896-12 

1903-259 
1902-45 



Diescher 

Diescher v. Walker v. Diescher and McGiU 

Dieterich , 

Dieterich & Co 

Dietz 



1902-202 
1880-208 



1880-211 
1880-208 

1900-166 

1890-119 

1877-14 

1904-157 

1903-155 



64-1649 
26-1207 



83-1347 
84-1873 

98-415 
105-744 

54-1711 
100-936 

26-1208 



14-202 
89-1672 

123-2627 
13-227 
69-1365 
79-1522 

88-1704 

94-2563 

103-1684 

98-1037 
101-3105 

75-1360 
84-1583 
105-1262 
98-1483 
98-2174 

122-1397 
116-593 
99-2550 
18-1224 
82-1417 
82-1418 

18-1225 

93-551 

52-459 

11-195 

110-309 

104-852 



41,42 



124, 213 

65.66 

66 

110 



124, 126 
37 



28 



70 



113 



101, 122 
122 
76, 122 



140 



50 

107 

41 

47 

126 



46 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Diffenderfer 

Dilg 

Dilg 

Dilg 

Dinkelbihler 

Dinkel v. D'Olier. . . . 
Disston V. Emerson . 
Disston V. Emerson . 



1872-164 
1904-401 
1904-463 



Disston and Morss v. Traut. 



Dittgen v. Parmenter. 
Dittgen v. Parmenter. 

Dittgen v. Parmenter. 

Dixon 

Dobeck v. Novotny. . . 



Doble V. Eckhart v. Henty Jr. 
Dobson V. Doman 



Dobson V. The Hartford Carpet Co.; The 
Bigelow Carpet Co. v. The Bigelow Car- 
pet Co. 

Dobson V. Lees 

Dod V. Cobb 

Dod V. Cobb 

Dodd V. Reading 

Dodge , 

Dodge 

Dodge 



1879-247 

1904^672 

1870-84 

1871-162 

1873-<$8 

1873-170 

1874-63 

1879-28 

1871-64 
1880-73 

1902-218 
1903-125 

1903-460 
1892-25 

1904-168 
1886-202 
1891-94 
1891-197 



1885-266 
1891-177 

1890-569 
1894-27 

1876-196 
1876-244 
1880-177 

1876-232 
1892-49 
1893-84 
1894-3 

1869-27 
1869-38 
1870-157 
1871-159 

1870-149 
1872-202 



2-57 
112-953 
113-547 
116-1067 
16-810 
113-2607 



15-562 



99-2966 
103-1164 
115-1328 

107-1098 

123-653 

68-804 

107-835 

110-604 
36-760 
79-2196 
110-310 
121-1677 
121-1678 

31-787 

79-2195 

80-809 

63-1740 



10-462 
101-1832 

10-826 
68-1413 



81 

96 

70 

70 

41 

116, 122 

127 



116 
122, 126 

126, 133 
37 



122 



3-179 
40-692 



139, 142 
97, 122 

88 



60 
68, 139 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



47 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Dodge V. Fowler. 



L898-320 

L898-28 
L898-257 

Dolan 1902-193 



Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone Co. 



Donnelan v. Berry. . . 
Donnelly v. Wjrman. 



Donning v. Anderson 

Donning v. Stackpole v. Laganke. 
Donning v. Stackpole v. Laganke. 
Donning v. Stackpole v. Laganke. 
Donovan 



Donovan. 



Dorman. 
Dorman. 



L888-321 

1890-20 

1890-89 

1892-228 

1893-32 

1893-35 

1894-38 

1887-140 
1903-96 



1904-262 

1903-26 

1903-298 

1903-417 

1888-100 

1890-124 

1892-186 

1890-109 
1891-80 
1891-233 
1896-96 

1903-37 



Dorr V. Ames and Rearson. 
Dorsey 



Doten 

Doty V. Osborne and Ballard. 



Double Pointed Tack 
Rivers Mfg. Co. 

Dover Stamping Co 



Co. V. The Two 



Dow V. Benson 

Dow V. Converse 

Dow V. Des Jardins. . 
Downie and Messner.. 

Downing 

Doyle V. McRoberts. . 



1903-296 

1870-17 

1871-45 

1877-115 

1869-77 

1870-122 

1883-458 
1890-132 

1890-94 
1893-97 

1903-476 
1903-404 



1902-240 
1902-317 
1895-80 



82-595 
113-1417 
114-2384 

99-2321 
113-549 

43-377 



135 



41-1499 
103-657 
104-310 

111-582 
102-819 
106-264 
107-268 
44-698 



52-309 



102-1049 

115-804 

120-1166 

106-263 



12-841 

25-1075 

51-1784 

107-1378 
106-2291 
119-1923 
100-235 
100-2176 
73-139 
95-233 



113 



121, 160 
159, 160 
118, 154 
157 



75 



165 
15, 179 

122 
37 

145 



122, 129 
70.76 
162 
42 
68 



48 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Doyle V. McRoberts. 



Doyle V. Spatilding; Illingworth v. Spatdd- 
ing 

Draper v. The Potomska Mills Corporation . 
Draper v. Seymour, Com. of Patents 

Draw and' Miller 

Drawbaugh 

Drawbaugh 

Drawbaugh v. Blake 

Drawbaugh v, Blake v. Edison 

Drawbaugh v. Seymour, Com. of Patents. . , 

Dreyfus v. Scarle 

Drummond v. Greenough 

Drury 

Dubem 

DuBois and McCloskey 

Duchemin v. Priester and Schutz , 

Duchemin v. Richardson and Stein 



1897-413 



Duckworth 

Duer V. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co 

Duff V. The Sterling Pump Co. . . 



1884-181 
1891-167 

1878^192 
1897-407 



1900-54 

1891-182 

1893-85 

1883-17 
1891-14 

1886-7 
1896-527 



1888-220 
1890-132 

1879-267 

1891-144 

1904-61 

1880-142 

1892-56 

1893-134 

1870-31 

1870-33 

1870-34 

1870-156 

1871-164 

1873-170 

1879-28 

1870-160 
1893-334 

1883-248 
1894-163 



79-1029 
83-1806 
86^800 
88-1526 
93-2320 
95-1454 
104-1124 

27-300 



13-276 
90-227 

79-864 
87-894 
88-718 

91-460 
57-693 
64-155 
88-1162 

23-1221 

83-743 

83-745 

30-259 
77-313 

89-1862 
108-798 
119-964 

42-491 



16-959 
56-1447 
108-1588 
17-1158 
58-1416 



68 

126 

41,42 

43,93,94 

107, 109 
122 

93 



93 

28, 189 

41.42 

92,123,142 



37 



63-1060 
118-268 
23-1622 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



49 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Dtiffy V. Reynolds 


1885-456 
1891-161 
8191-217 
1892-144 


33-621 

115-803 
118-2538 

16-499 

16-1002 

11-35 
95-442 

76-788 
80-1127 

113-2213 

113-2214 

121-687 

109-805 

123-2310 

67-1517 
96-2579 

119-1925 
122-730 

119-1261 

119-2236 

10-243 

110-2017 

67-814 

91-1615 

71-601 
87-895 
90-960 
100-2178 
105-1781 
113-2506 
122-1048 

114-761 
115-803 
118-2249 
122-1395 




Dtikes 


2,94 


Dulctur V. Matthew v. Dulctur and Peters 




114 


V. Jackson 
Du Motay 


1879-195 
1879-269 
1879-269 
1879-195 

1877-140 

1877-33 

1877-88 

1878-9 

1878-89 

1878-106 

1879-84 

1880-106 

1896-478 
1904-552 


37, 133 


Du Motay 


37 


Dunbar and Hopper v. Myers and Eunson 
Dunbar v. Eastern Elevatinfif Co 




Dunbar v Schellinfifer 


4,121.154 


Dunbar v Schellinsrer 


126 


Duncan and Duncan 


1904-79 

1894-347 
1896-390 


5,15 


DiinViam v. Dtmnison Miff. Co 




Dunker v. Reist 


122 


Dunn V Hallidav 




110, 113 


Dunn V. Hallidav 




122, 124 


Dunton v. Youncr and McFarren 


1876-167 
1904-234 
1894-291 

1895-307 


122 


Durafort 


68,128,133 


Durand, Hugenin & Co. v. Green, Schulze, 
Berge and Koechlin 

Durham v. Seymour, Com. of Patents 

Durvea and White v. Rice 


66 
22, 145 


Duryea and White v. Rice 




122, 124 


Duryea and White v. Rice 




116 


Duryea and White v. Rice Jr 




126 



50 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Duryea and White v. Rice. 
Dutcher Temple Co 



Duthie V. Caslear 

Dwyer 

Dwyer and Carter v. Dickey and Perry. 

Dyer 

Dyer 



Dysart . 



Eachees v. Broomall. 
Eagle 



Eagleton Mfg. Co. v. West, Bradley and 

Cary Mfg. Co. 
Eagleton Mfg. Co: v. West, Bradley and 

Cary Mfg. Co. 



Eames and Seeley v. McDougall. 
Eames v. Andrews 



Earle and Hoyt v. Danderdale. . . 
Eastern Paper Bag Co. v. Nixon. 



Eastern Paper Bag Co. v. Standard Paper 
Bag Co. 



Eastman. 



Eastman v. Houston . 
Eastman v. Houston . 



•Eaton, Hitchcock and Wells. 



1871-248 
1871-285 

1872-50 

1901-41 

1876-214 

1891-152 

1903-365 

1886-4 



1885-501 

1870-137 
1877-120 
1879-194 



1880-532 

1884-261 
1891-165 
1892-219 

1871-206 
1875-123 

-1887-378 
1891-56 

1871-174 
1888-594 
1890-11 

1887-537 
1889-119 
1890-11 
1894-86 

1891-178 
1893-83 

1899-113 
1901-386 



1870-51 
1870-53 



123-2627 



1-255 

95-1247 

10-585 

56-1564 

106-1508 

34-1390 
91-2372 
97-1175 

33-1265 
78-2196 



38-1133 

40-917 

90-959 

101-447 

108-1588 

17-1504 



27-1237 
117-2086 



39-1319 



451-517 

41-231 
87-700 
94-1789 
97-401 

57-410 
97-192 

87-1781 
95-2064 
100-934 
105-260 
106-1240 



126, 139 
124 



93,94 
41 

116, 126 
15 

105, 106 
108, 175 
133 



37.50 



20 



125 



116 



66 



65,66,133 
145 
122 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



51 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Ecaubert v. Hofmann . 

Eccard v. Drawbaugh . 
Eddleblute 



Edgecombe v. Eastman v. Houston. 

Edgerton 

Edison 



Edison. 
Edison. 

Edison . 
Edison. 



Edison Electric Light Co. and Edison Elec- 
tric Light Co. of Philadelphia v. Phila- 
delphia Safe Deposit & Insurance Co. 
Edison Electric Light Co. and Edison 
Electric Light Co. of Philadelphia v. 
Mfr's. Club of Philadelphia. 

Edison Electric Light Co. v. U. S. Electric 
Lighting Co. 

Edison and GiUiland v. Phelps 



Edison v. Ball. 



Edison v. Coffin. 



Edison v. Maxim v. Swan 
Edison v. Stanley Jr 

Edwards 



1890-143 
1891-30 

1883-60 
1890-124 

1899-207 
1902-382 
1875-42 

1876-126 

1878-53 

50-189 

1888-169 

1894-35 

1889-234 

1890-34 

1891-1 

1891-4 

1891-96 

1891-1 
1892-63 

1891-133 

1894-196 



1892-606 
1^94-105 

1887-11 

1896-811 

1896-63 

1896-65 

1869-68 

1870-26 

1870-122 

1871-144 

1871-147 

1879-28 

1891-190 

1891-173 
1894-14 

1904-48 



62-2107 

24-301 
62-761 
80-1476 

89-707 

101-1131 

7-423 



46-461 
49-1691 



64-263 
92-384 

66-1061 
96-2410 
66-1697 
79-158 



61-664 
38-639 
71-1313 



127 
68,76 

66,66,93 
49 



66,76 



122, 123 
127, 129 



67-696 
100-684 

67-273 
83-746 
86-1636 

108-105 168,134,146 



52 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Edwards and Grefiforv 


1904-179 

1869-28 

1871-121 


110^860 


20 


Edwards v. Reaua 








Kp1^(^, v. TrfioTMnann. ....,.,, r - . r . 


1882-35 


21-75 
97-401 








Efflv V. Schulze 




117-276 
117-2366 
109-275 
121-1349 


121 


Rcrlv V. Srhiil5» 




96, 122 


Ehrendriech 


1904-75 


31 






Eickelberg 


1902-333 
1902-174 


100-2773 
99-1622 

121-1675 
65-1918 
84-145 
84-2018 
84-2020 


145 


Eickemeyer 


26 


Einstein 


69 


Einstein v. Sawhill 


1893-677 








Elbers 


1877-55 


12-2 
121-338 
83-748 
83-1994 
84-507 
89-1344 
97-1373 


41 


Elbersen 


30, 209 


Eldon 


1898-63 








Eldredge & Co 


1891-81 

1892-7 

1893-115 


55-1278 








Electric Ry. Signal Co. v. The Hall Ry. 
Signal Co. 


1885-238 

1891-24 

1891-217 


31-515 




Electrical Accumvilator Co. v. Brush Elec- 
tric Co. 


1891-373 


55-573 
79-512 




Electrical Accumulator Co. v. Brush Elec- 
tric Co. 


1892-634 
1893-87 


61-886 
79-512 
92-384 




Electrical Accumulator Co. v. Julien Elec- 
tric Co. 


1893-437 


64-559 
97-1596 
103-660 
104-1121 




Elger V. Miller 


1889-108 
1890-90 


46-1514 I 


187 






Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch 
Case Co. 


1901-273 


94-755 

95-231 

97-1597 

118-1937 




Elliott 


1904-103 
1876-140 
1877-44 


109-1337 
9-1110 


50 


Ellis 


133 






Eluere 




117-2635 


171 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



53 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Emerson. 
Emerson. 
Emerson. 



1879-330 
1880-143 

1880-143 

1904-118 



Emmet v. Ftdlagar. 
Erbev. HiU 



Erdman. 



Erne and Bridges. 
Ernest 



Ernst 

Eschinger v. Drimimond and Lieberknecht 
Eschner 



Essex 

Essex V. Woods. 



Estabrook v. Dunbar. 
Estes V. Gause 



Esty V. Newton. 



1869-29 

1869-58 

1869-78 

1870-12 

1870-50 

1870-97 

1870-120 

1871-11 

1871-144 

1871-146 

1879-28 

1900-197 



1879-197 
1896-33 

1885-101 
1893-68 



1876-68 
1899-189 

1876-619 
1899-164 



1899-284 



16-1232 

17-1461 
40-574 

109-1609 
110-1728 
112-1752 

114-1661 



21-1826 



93-2531 
96-2060 
99-1384 
100-233 
100-681 

81-2247 
109-2171 
76-1417 
91-1616 
97-551 
104-1655 
33-236 
121-1348 
63-760 
91-2372 
90-497 
89-363 
104-580 
10-909 
88-1336 
101-1133 
101-1832 
86-799 
94-986 
94-1970 
95-1648 
100-2176 
100-2386 
105-977 
106-1241 
107-267 
107-1660 
112-955 
113-1749 
114-766 
117-280 
123-1285 



66 

66.93,94 
41,42,145 

113 



41,42 



28 



66,66,70 



87 

122, 124 
68 

191 
122 



54 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Evans and Shepard 


1901-64 

1873-36 

1880-78 

1874-39 

1889-213 

1893-73 

1871-239 

1873-75 

1873-165 

1874-92 

1876-192 

1903-231 


96-425 

97-750 

3-180 

17-448 
92-1038 

5-429 
49-664 
63-1381 




Evans v. Bussell v. Vose 


93,94,114 


Ewart 


122 
37 


Evarts 


63,65,135 


Everett 


43 


Everson 


41,42 


Eynon - 


37 


Eynon '. 


106-499 
121-1013 

59-630 
70-635 
78-1431 

92-1437 
122-1725 

113-1148 

119-651 

3-65 

3-323 

85-1222 

96-1038 

111-579 
67-1127 
120-2758 

17-150 

21-1896 

23-2511 

96-2062 
114r-2096 
122-2064 

9-195 
18-412 
83-1803 
84-309 
89-189 
96-1037 
100-450 

89-706 
91-459 


34,36,470 


Pa?an v Gravbill - . . 


106, 109 


Failor 


1892-96 
1896-159 

1900-343 

1904-503 


122 
204 


Fairbank Co. v. Central Lard Co 




Fairbank Co. v. Luckel, King and Cake 
Soap Co. 

Fairbanks and Sauer v, ICarr 


18.164 


Fairbanks and Sauer v. ICarr 


124 


Fairbanks v. Robinson. . . , ^ r r t t r t - t t r - t ^ t 


1873-12 
1873-45 
1898-246 

1904-677 
1891-203 

1880-6 
1880-166 

1901-127 


65 


Fairchild 


81 


Fairfax v. Rutin and Leblance v. Patten 
V. Steinmetz v. Scott 

Faller v. Lorimer 


162 


Fanshawe 




Farmer v. Brush 




Farmers Mfg. Co. v. W. R. Harrison & Co 
Famham 


68 
50.173.179 


Famsworth v. Andrews 


1876-3 
1880-155 

1899-205 


96, 101 


Famum • 




Farauhar 


41 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



55 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Farquharso" . , , , - - . ^ . - - t r - r 


1876-218 

1872-148 
1877-32 
1887-33 
1889-248 

1888-120 

1869-113 

1870-55 
1874-23 
1874-24 
1876-48 
1879-317 

1903-118 

1893-129 
1899-232 
1900-232 

1883-474 
1892-102 
1899-29 

1899-218 

1891-176 

1892-5 
1892-6 

1901-269 


10-702 
40-693 

2-67 
11-420 
40-243 

44-946 
82-185 
82-1419 
83-594 
84-1587 
115-1328 

37-1001 

103-891 

107-2236 
108-289 
111-2223 
117-903 

65-761 

90-1157 

90-1157 

118-2254 

25-1277 

86-1497 
97-750 

89-1343 

89-1344 

116-2008 
117-280 

67-409 

80-1760 
87-515 

94-433 

94-987 
94-1970 
95-1648 
106-1241 
107-1660 
110-1724 
115-252 
122-733 




Farrow 


37 


Fassett 


'86 


Faure v. Bradley and Crocker v. Cowles 
and Cowles 


101, 122 
124, 126 


Faure v. Bradley and Crocker v. Cowles 
and Cowles 

Fawcett v. Graham 


140 


Faxon 




Fay V. Conradson 


12, 126 


Fav V. Duell, Com. of Patents 


144 


Fay V. Duell, Com. of Patents 




Fay & Co. v. Cordesman Bros., Cordesman 

Jr. and Cordesman 
Featherston & Co 




Feder v. Povet 


3. 81. 97 


Fefel 


41,42 


Fefel V. Stocker 









56 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Feister. 



Feister. 



Felbel. 



Felbel v. Aguilar. 
Felbel v. Oliver. . 



Felbel v. Oliver. 



Felbel v. Oliver. 



Feld 

Felsing v. Nelson 

Felsing v. Nelson 

Felsing v. Nelson 

Fennell v. Brown v. Borsch Jr. 
Fenno 



Fenno 

Ferguson 

Ferguson 

Ferrell 

Ferris 

Fessenden v. Potter. 



Feucht 

Fiddnger and Blake v. Hulett. 

Fickinger and Blake v. Hulett. 
Finch 



Finch V. Bailey and Talbot. 
Finck 



1890-167 

1891-67 

1892-203 

1892-204 

1894-1 

1892-203 
1893-79 
1893-101 
1894-2 

1891-176 

1892-5 

1892-6 



1900-160 

1902-309 
1902-315 
1902-565 

1902-316 
1902-309 
1902-565 

1904-376 



1871-62 
1878-129 

1890-138 
1891-143 
1894-6 
1903-316 



1902-466 

1899-178 

1904-177 

1904-360 

1887-96 

1891-152 

1883-69 

1892-139 

1894-108 

1894-109 



63-1089 
92-1797 



61-162 

92-1797 

101-1832 

67-409 

80-1760 

87-515 

121-1012 
92-2339 
112-501 
100-1976 
100-1976 
100-2175 
105-977 

100-2175 
112-955 

112-262 

120-2446 

121-1347 

122-1722 

115-1328 



4-<S91 
42-293 

62-1666 

66-1334 

66-661 

106-766 

114-641 

101-2823 

88-2066 
98-2363 
110-869 
115-1330 

111-2492 
40-1027 

26-191 
60-157 



65,66 



41,42.66 
66, 133 



86 
76, 122 

126 



68 
122 

122, 124 
142 
116 



171 

133 

66,66 

41,68 

96 

122, 123 

126 

146 

122 

122 
126 

101, 126 
79 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



57 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Finlayson, Bousfield & Co. 



Finley v. Chapman.. 

Firm 

Firsching 

Fish...; 

Fish 

Fischer 

Fisher v. Daugherty. 

Fitzhugh 

Flagg 



Flanigan 

Flather v. Weber. 



Fletcher 

FlindaU 

Flint & Walling Mfg. Co. 



Flomerfelt 

Flomerfelt v. Newilter. 



Flora V. Powrie 

Florsheim v. Schilling. 



Floyd 

Follansbee. 



Forbes v. Thomson. 
Forbes v. Thomson. 



Ford 

Fordyce v. Taisey. 



Forg 

Forsyth v. Emery. 



Forsyth v. Richards. 

Foster 

Foster 



1892-201 

1872-63 
1887-27 
1897-49 
1900-69 



1887-18 



1870-104 

1872-16 

1903-90 

1903-561 

1903-70 



1898-636 

1896-59 
1898-562 

1904-636 

1886-265 

1891-197 

1874-104 

1870-127 

1872-66 

1890-61 

1890-185 
1893-90 

1904r-56 
1903-31 



1894-138 
1896-60 

1904-556 



61-152 
113^52 

1-277 

39-1199 

80-1272 

91-1615 

114-2091 

38-1237 

118-1681 

120-660 



1885-100 
1903-213 



103-428 

104-312 

113-1708 

114-545 

122-1396 

85-148 
96-841 

76-2007 

85-458 

90-1949 

109-2443 

123-1288 

35-1436 
6-541 



61-297 
96-1038 

63-2042 

108-1327 
102-821 
104-1394 
107-269 

66-516 

113-2215 

114-973 

115-803 

116-1327 

33-113 

106-261 



209 

93,94 

43. 107 

20 

41 

170 

108 

116 

6 

37 

199 



66 
68 



76 



148 



24,34 



2,94,114 

116 

41,42,48 

41,42 



124 



76. 110 
48 
76, 133 



58 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Foster and Foster v. Bent 


1896-89 


77-1781 


117 


Foster and Townsend v. Towle 


1869-36 
1870-7 
1870-25 
1870-43 






Foster v. Antisdel 


1899-413 


88-1527 
101-1608 
103-1684 
104-1124 
105-498 
105-977 
107-1097 
109-1050 
111-1036 
112-958 
118-1072 
121-2664 




Foster v. Crossin 


1891-304 
1893-328 


54-1115 








Foulis 


1902-233 


100-232 
100-233 


41 






Fowler 


1894-109 
1902-420 


69-1641 
101-1833 


26 


Fowler 


65, 209 


Fowler 


1902-466 


101-2822 


65 


Fowler 


1904-470 


113-549 


153, 179 


Fowler and Fowler 


1889-209 
1893-111 


49-562 
64-1131 


179 


Fowler and Hutton 


26 


Fowler v. Benton 


1880-39 


17-266 
85-1738 
97-1171 
97-1172 


12, 124 






Fowler v. Boyce v. Dyson v. McBerty 


1903-434 


107-544 


13, 113 


Fowler v. Boyce v. Temple and Goodrum 


1903-432 


107-543 


104. 144 


V. Dyson v. McBerty. . 
Fowler v. Boyce v. Temple and Goodrum.. 


. 1904-22 


108-561 
108-662 
111-499 


113 


Fowler v. Boyce 




118-2534 


110 


Fowler v. Bovce 




121-1014 


110, 132 


Fowler v. Boyce 




122-1726 


110, 113 






123-2313 




Fowler v. Dodcre 


1897-8 


78-2045 








81-2087 




Fowler v. Dodcre 


1898-28 


82-1687 






1898-257 
1898-320 


85-151 
92-382 




Fowler v. Dodcre 


1898-257 


85-1584 






1898-28 
1898-320 


86-1499 
91-1034 





PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



59 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Fowler v. Dodge. 



1899-316 



Fowler v. McBerty 

Fowler v. Temple et al v. Dyson v. McBertj 
Fox V. Barrett 



1903-432 
1902-152 



Frank and Gutmann v. Macwilliam. 
Frank v. Hess 



Franklin 

Franklin v. Morton v. Cooley. 



Frasch. 

Frasch. 
Frasch. 
Frasch. 



Frederick v. Frederick and Frederick. 



Frederick von Hefner-Altemeck. 



Fredericks and Bums , 

Freeland and Ward v. Trent. 



Freeman. 



Freeman. 



1898-397 

1873-116 
1875-153 

1901-49 



1900-50 

1902-65 
1902-560 
1904-104 
1902-182 

1883-33 



1887-66 
1869-93 
187g-28 

1892-20 
1893-89 

1903-172 



87-895 
92-1038 

121-1015 
107-543 
99-862 
100-233 
101-1831 

114-542 
82-1566 
89-1344 

4-105 



95-2063 
98-2586 
100-232 
100-1332 
111-449 

91-459 

91-1615 

100-1978 

98-1967 
109-1338 

100-1977 
109-1338 

109-554 
109-1338 

99-1865 
100-3013 
110-1429 
113-551 

23-2233 

91-1618 
101-2571 

40-691 



58-522 



104-1396 

109-1339 

110^10 

112-251 

114-761 

117-599 



110 
104 
42 



103, 126 

37.41 
113,119 

41,42 

145 
41 
41,133.146 
122 



63 



41 



81,82,84 



60 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Freeman. 



Freeman and Parks . 
Freeman v. Asmus. . 



Freeman v. Bernstein 

Freeman v. Garrels and Kimball. 



Freese 

French v. Halcomb. 
French & Hyatt 



Fretmd 

Frevert v. Gahr. 
Frick 



Frieslendt v. Harold. . 

Fritts 

Fritts 

Fulgham v. Westcott. 

Fulgham v. Westcott. 



Fullagar v. Junggren 

Fuller.... 

Fuller 

Fuller and Bamum v. Yentzer and Scates. 



Fuller V. Brush. 
Fuller V. Huff. . 



Funck. 



Funck V. Doty. 
Funck V. Doty, 



1904-619 



1892-415 



1898-39 
1903-56 

1880-133 
1904-218 
1873-168 
1874-63 



1873-92 

1872-124 

1889-185 



1902-383 
1903-286 
1879-278 
1880-168 

1880-167 
1879-278 



Funk V. Matteson v. Haines. 



1891-243 

1892-27 

1877-218 

1879-329 
1900-351 

1878-89 
1878-18 
1878-77 

1878-18 
1878-77 
1878-89 

1878-77 
1878-18 
1878-89 

1901-297 



109-1339 

104-1396 

110-310 

117-599 

121-1677 

117-276 
59-1432 
117-2085 
123-324 

83-155 
87-517 

102-1777 
103-1683 

17-1095 

110-1727 

4-609 

119-651 
3-660 
1-574 

116-594 
101-1131 
105-2059 
16-1005 

18-571 
23-1331 
114-1550 
57-1883 
58-804 
11-551 
94-158 

16-1188 
92-1620 
108-288 

14-158 



13-322 



14-157 



100-1563 



79,81 



130 



37,41 
142 



70 

93,94 
94, 122 

113 
171 
68 



113 
133 
41,42 



76, 124 



147 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



61 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Funk V. Matteson v. Haines 


1902-553 

1889-223 
1904-305 


100-1764 
106-1776 
106-1778 
122-733 

49-1044 
111-1366 
111-1368 
114-1652 
119-1521 
104-1655 

37-217 

121-691 
55-863 
91-1616 

22-2119 

123-657 
123-1994 

123-1994 
124-322 
107-2632 
109-1072 
86-1907 
89-2070 
116-593 

100-232 

114-973 

103-1165 

103-425 

103-1684 

110-1726 

112-1213 

115-508 

117-280 

118-592 

121-1981 

123-1288 

115-1330 
55Ap-77 
117-2087 
118-1072 
121-1352 
121-2329 
123-1667 




Funston 


6,171.197 
96, 116 


Funnan v. Dean 


Fiirman v. Dean 




Furness 


1903-174 

1886-28 

1888-136 

1889-199 

1890-167 

1890-169 

1894-1 


50,70 
66 


Gaboury 


Gabrielson v. Felbel 


125 


Gaebel 


1891-65 

1892-48 

1870-100 

1872^5 

1883-289 

1892-103 


145 


Gaee 




Gage V. Herring 




Gains & Co. v. Knecht & Son 




Gaines & Co. v. Carlton Importation Co 






Galbraith 


1903-515 
1898-666 

1902-232 




Gale Mfg. Co 




Gales V. Berrigan 


113 


Gallagher v. Despradels 


145 


Galla&rher v. Hastin&s 


1903-531 
21Ap-88 




Gallaeher Jr. v. Hien 











62 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Gallatin 


1892-106 
1896-38 

1903-480 
1904-488 


59-1104 

80-1273 

89-521 

108-2145 

107-1660 
115-802 

113-851 

120-1325 

124-317 

3-321 
78-1903 
92-2003 

98-2171 
59-1106 
97-2980 

39-1423 
78-1741 

122-1396 
17-626 
17-801 

18-683 

107-267 
93-190 
15-383 
23^1222 

103-1683 

102-1777 

109-1337 

118-836 

120-1826 

120-2128 

123-207 

122-1048 

54-1889 

84-1283 
84-1284 
93-1917 
94-584 
108-797 
109-1336 

101-2569 


5,6 


Gaily 


41,42,68 


^^"**j 

Gaily V. Brand 


69,71,133 

171 
70, 124 


Gaily V. Burton 


122 


Galiisha. 


1873-55 

1902-78 
1892-395 

1887-413 
1891-33 




GainmoTTs ..,,.. 


65,66 


Gandy v. Main Bldg. Co 




Gandy v. Marble 




Garcia v. Pons 


122 


Gardner 


1880-110 
1880-123 
1880-177 

1880-177 
1880-123 

1903-414 
1900-160 
1879-379 
1895-157 

1903-56 


93 


Gardner v. Dudley 




Gardner v. Dudley 


142 


Garland 


50 


Garms 


66 


Garratt v. Seibert 




Garrels v. Freeman 




Garrett 


141, 148 


Garrigues 


1870-88 
1872-85 

1891-59 

1902-453 




Garrison v. Hubner , 




Garton-Daniels Co 


170 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



63 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Qasser 


1880-94 

1889-250 

1881-39 

1889-219 

1900-20 

1870-65 

1870-153 

1871-144 

1877-61 

1870-92 


17-507 

23-1224 

52-309 

103-1680 

118-837 

90-959 


r5,94,108 


Gasstnanti 


37 


Gates V. Benson 




Gatling 


50 


Gaylord 


117-2366 
98-1486 
L9Apl92 
103-227 
103-428 
103-1684 
110-1726 
112-1213 

118-692 
122-2391 
123-1288 
114-2089 
120-905 
44-822 
97-2533 
108-2146 

43-1235 

43-1240 

116-595 
73-1555 
96-2585 

11-244 

50-433 

83-1806 

110-1171 

15-289 
91-459 
91-460 

124-624 
106-976 

16-763 
102-621 

23-2511 


48,74,171 


Gedge v. Cromwell 


1902-514 




Gem Cutlery Co. v. Leach^ 




Gentry 


1888-115 

1888-37 
1891-96 
1888-49 
1891-142 


6,39 


Gerard 




Gerard 




Gerdom v. Ehrhardt 


124 


Germain v. Wilgus 


1895-716 

1877-19 
1871-48 
1890-6 

1879-356 




Gerson 


37 


Gessner 

Gessner v. Miller. . .^ 


110, 142 


Giant Powder Co. v. The California 
Powder Works 




Gibbons v. Peller 


154 


Gibloney 


1903-249 

1879-233 

1903-20 

1883-44 

1890-76 

1890-90 


93, 124 


Gilbert 

Gilbert-Stringer v. Johnson 

Gill V. Scott 


.36 
116 







64 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Gill V. Scott 


1884-68 

1877-20 

1900-149 

1888-107 

1889-101 

1889-102 

1889-135 

1876-195 
1904^102 
1898-614 

1903-108 
1905- 


22-949 

11-419 

92-2159 

44-819 

89-2069 

98-2365 

10-415 
109-1337 
83-1992 
84-1870 
86-1497 
89-2070 

103-662 
115-1584 
120-2753 
122-351 


142 


Gillen 


127 


Gillespie 


108 


Gillette 




Gillies 


41 


Gilmer 


68, 142 


Gilson Co 




Girard v. Abbott, Girard and McGirr 

Girardot 


93,122,153 
46 


Gironcoli 


171 


Glafke 




167 


Gleason and Grossman , 


1870-158 
1871-191 
1898-407 

1894-51 
1895-273 




Glenn v. Adams 

Glidden v. Noble 


83-158 
95-1648 

67-676 
71-141 
82-1689 
99-666 . 
86-1326 
122-733 


125 


Glidden v. Noble; Glidden v. Bussell 

Glue — 97 U. S-3 


65,66 


Godellot 


1874-120 
1875-103 
1876-149 
1877-46 

1892-138 

1903-330 

1875-98 

1877-62 

1881-48 

1890-34 

1902-238 
1892-41 

1904-152 
1894-518 


6-641 

59-2067 
106-998 
8-141 

100-234 

58-1092 
100-3014 

110-309 
114-761 
114-762 

69-124 

86-1635 

87-1398 




Gold 


165 


Gold 


86 


Golding 


94, 171 


Goldman 


41,42,65 


Goldsmith 


77,78 
142 


Goldsmith 


81,83.84 


Goldstein v. Whelan 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



65 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Goodale. 



Goodfellow V. Jolly. 
Goodfellow V. Jolly. 
Goodfellow V. Jolly. 



1872-195 
1876-122 

1904-163 
1904-338 



Goodman v. Scribner. 



1872-254 
188^-185 



Goodwin v. Smith 

Goodyear Rubber Co. v. Goodyear's Rub- 
ber Mfg. Co. 

Goodyear's India Rubber Glove Mfg. Co. 
V. The Goodyear Rubber Co. 

Gordon 

Gordon 



Gordon 

Gordon v. Wentworth. 
Gordon v. Withington. 



1885-115 
1891-141 

1889-257 
1890-98 

1874-108 
1877-108 

1904-20 



Goss V. Scott. 



1876-110 
1877-31 

1901-80 



Gottfried v. The Phillip Best Brewing Co . . . 

Gottstein 

Gould 

Gould V. Ballard 

Graham 

Graham 

Graham v. McCormick \ 



Graham v. The Geneva Lake Crawford 
Mfg. Co. 



1880-319 

1877-47 
1876-164 
1878-289 
1878-92 

1873-34 
1874-14 

1904-436 

1882-229 

1890-11 

1893-87 

1895-64 

1882-237 

1891-181 

1892-57 

1892-147 

1894-93 



2-589 

110-602 
110-1940 
115-1064 
117-277 

2-673 

123-998 
30-97 

46-122 
95-230 

6-543 
12-517 
84-310 

108-561 
120-1165 
9-1009 



122 

152, 154 
121, 153 

93,94 

122, 124 



171 



70 
122 



96-842 te, 124,213 

97-2306 

98-415 
105-744 
105-1780 
106-763 
108-767 
116-2010 

17-675 
80-520 



11-1061 

10-203 

13-1081 

3-211 

112-1752 
21-1533 
83-1346 
97-401 

21-1536 
96-1038 
97-401 



88 
39, 145 



171 



5, 6, 26 



66 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Grant. 



Graves. 
Gray. . . 



Gray. 



Gray 

Gray 

Gray 

Gray v. Bell. 



Gray v. Hale. 



Gray v. McKenzie v. McElroy. 
Gray v. Robertson 



Graydon 

Gravely v. Gravely. 
Greaves , 



Greaves 

Green v. Hall v. Seemens v. Field. 



Green v. Hall v. Seemens v. Field. 



Green v. Hall v. Seemens v. Field. 



Green v. Hall v. Seemens v. Field. 



Green v. Hall v. Seemens v. Field. 

Greenawalt v. Marks 

Greenawalt v. Marks 



1900-199 

1903-80 
1870-88 
1870-132 
1871-4 

1877-18 

1878-135 

1881-1 

1877-44 
1889-91 



1878-133 

1879-42 

1889-23 

1871-129 

1872-6 

1872-59 

1872-91 

1872-207 

1904-540 

1890-1 

1891-113 

1883-71 

1891-233 

1890-461 

1891-240 

1877-80 

1880-75 

1880-213 

188&-43 

1889-197 

1893-15 

1889-110 

1889-156 

1889-161 

1893-64 

1893-66 

188^166 
1889-110 
1889-161 

1889-161 
1889-110 
1889-156 

1889-166 
1904-352 
1903-135 



93-2532 



103-228 



11-329 



12-396 
46-1277 
114-543 
15-385 



21-1806 
23-2413 
30-1092 

113-1968 
50-165 

25-192 

52-1538 

12-312 

18-623 

37-1475 

97-1837 

46-1515 
88-1159 



47-813 



47-1631 
88-1159 
81-2087 

47-1633 
111-2224 
103-1913 
106-2291 



58. 142, 
145. 171 
170 



37 



184 
68.96 
79 
153 



171 



122 
93 

93.94 



89 

122. 123 
124. 153 



142 



144 



12 
116 
2.126,154 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



67 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Greenfield 

Greenough v. Drummond. 

Greenough v. Drummond. 
Greenwood v. Dover 



Gregoire&Co. 



Greir v. Christy. . 
Grell V. Kuhnert. 



Greth. 



Greuter 

Greuter v. Mathiew. 
Greuter v. Mathiew. 



Grier v. Wnt. 



Griffith. 
Griffin.. 



Griffith. 



Griffin. 



Griffith V. Dodgson. 
Griffith V. Dodgson. 
Griffith V. Swenson. 



Grimm v. Dolan. 



Grinnell v. Buell 

Griserin-Werke Paul Camphausen G. M. 

B.H. 
Griswold 



Griswold V. Seymour. 



1892-6 

1879-213 

1879-267 

1879-269 

1904-66 



1903-39 



1869-5 

1870-156 

1871-134 



1904-264 
1904-378 



1887-269 

1897-46 
1898-224 

1898-233 
1900-83 



1899-440 

1898-70 
1899-236 



1890-13 
1894-12 
1897-248 



68-274 
16-686 
16-959 



109-2172 

112-732 

114-263 

114-976 

115-508 

102-1293 
105-745 

116-297 



116-2632 

122-1046 

116-696 

111-683 

112-263 

112-264 



41 
37,93,94 

37 
148 



94 



68 

132 
123 

122,123, 
124 



38-1366 
79-2196 
80-1126 207 
86-464 
92-1798 

86-936 37,42,66 
101-449 
101-1832 

91-2001 86 
108-1054 

116-1731 122, 126 
122-2064 122 

89-919 

91-^19 

94-2563 

83-1209 

84-1144 

89-1863 70,109.130 
120-327 
121-2327 

60-838 68 
105-498 

78-482 

87-894 



68 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Groebli 




118-2537 
11-797 

76-1573 
97-2977 
97-2980 

89-1671 
26-274 

41-1165 

117-1492 

119-338 
86-1986 
89-2070 

61-285 

84-1283 

84-1284 

10-165 

114-544 
82-1561 
84^313 

3ap-107 
86-800 
86-1326 

122-733 

17-507 

120-325 

4-610 

39-239 

101-2826 
115-1063 

64-559 
80-1126 
83-747 
83-1994 

8-597 

96-1429 

97-958 

24-391 
80-814 


37 


Gross V. Sargent 

Grosselin 


1877-37 
1877-88 

1896-39 
1901-248 

1899-226 

1884-2 

1884-2022 

1887-639 
1892-28 


76 


Grosselin 

Groves 

Gruson and Schtunan 


75 
133, 145 


Guarantee Insurance Trust & Safe 
Deposit Co. V. Sellers 

Gueniffet, Benoit and Vicault v. Wichor- . 


124 


sohn 
Gueniffet, Benoit and Vicatilt > 




106 


Guenther Milling Co 


1899-61 
1892-205 

1876-144 
1876-188 

, 




Guerrant v. Cable v. Coffee. ...-.,,, ^ , - - - 




Guest V. Pinch 


110,113 


Guett V. TrefiToninfif 


110. 113 


Guilbert v. Killinirer 


1898-26 

1898-522 

1898-26 

1880-94 




Guilbert v. KilHnger 




Guiser 


108 


Gullv V. Burlin 


97 


Haasz 


1873-170 

1875-67 

1876-162 

1902-474 

1893-94 
1897-47 

1875-107 
1901-105 

1883-338 


37 


Haeseler and Taylor 


164 


Hafely and Redlefsen 


71 


Haeeard 


41,42,79 


Hahn 


37 


Hahn 




Hailes v. Albanv Stove Co 









PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



69 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Hakanson. 

Hale 

Haley 



Halfpenny. 



Hall and Eraser. 
HalloweU 



Hallv. Alvord.... 

Hallv. Latta 

Hall V. Macneale. 



Hallv. Weber 

Hall V. Weber 

Hallwood V. Labor v. Bockhoff . 



Hallwood V. Labor . 



Halsey. . . 
Hamilton. 



Hamilton v Carroll v. Goldberg v. Stahl- 
berg 

Hamilton v. Fisher 

Hamilton v. Foster 



Hammerschlag v. Scamoni. 



Hammond 

Hammond v. Basch. 



1893^76 

1900-128 

1888-137 

1890-55 

1890-104 

1895-91 
1897-169 

1903-233 
1903-268 

1902-418 

1892-113 

1883-191 

1904-55 

1904-112 

1903-109 



1903-109 



1903-41 
1878-16 
1878-64 

1904-248 

1871-271 

1869-30 

1870-32 

1870-43 

1871-104 

1873-108 

1881-294 



1872-149 



63-1688 
92-1437 
44-1399 



73-1135 
81-968 
113-548 

105-743 
105-1633 

101-1833 
111-1038 

59-1431 
99-2970 

23-937 
97-401 

108-1054 

109-1607 

103-887 

103-2173 

112-2093 

114-1829 

103-2173 

103-887 

114-1829 

102-1294 
13-122 

110-2510 



20-75 
80-362a 

2-57 
115-804 
24ap-469 
122-1726 
122-2066 
123-1665 
123-2313 



47 
133 



37. 133 



41 

41,42,65 
66.75 
153, 159 



157 
126 



46 
41 

113 

142, 171 
93.94 



68. 134 
110, 113 



70 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Hammond v. Hart • . 


1898-52 


83-743 
83-1209 


96 


AAO***** J%r**Vfc • • ^^m** vvv*«**«*B«*«*«**«**** 








83-1659 








83-1801 








83-1806 








84-984 








84-1141 








84-1144 








84-1434 








84-1583 








84-1585 








84-1729 








84-1869 








86-490 








86-491 








86-1500 








86-1634 








87-180 








98-228 








104-580 








106-1502 








106-1777 








111-1038 








111-1368 




Hammond v. Laird*. • •••••..• 


1875-23 
1876-135 


7-170 










1876-224 








1889-38 






Hammond v. Pratt 


1879-337 
1899-92 


16-1235 

87-698 

96-425 


131 ;;; 


Hance Bros, and White. 








Handley v. Bradley , 


1899-197 


89-522 


25 




1899-201 


89-191 


r 


Handlev v. Bradlev * 


1899-201 


89-191 


103 


^^mmAAXJLAX^Y ~ • Ai^A ««VAA^^ y •••••••••••••••••••• 


1899-197 


89-522 




Hanifen v. Godshalk Co 


1897-375 


79-510 
83-1511 








Hanifen v. Godschalk Co 


1897-381 


79-513 
90-962 




^^*^*****^'"* » • X^^^^Afc*********^ ^^\^ ••••■ ••••••••••■ 




Hanscom v. Latham ♦ 


1876-140 
1876-220 


9-1157 








Hansen 




117-2632 
55-998 


124, 153 
75 


Hansen v. Davis 


1891-72 
1893-109 






Hansen v. Wardell 




116-2008 
103-1417 
105-2058 


144 


Hanson 


1903-128 
1903-284 


81,84 


Hanson 


79.24 


Hanson 




114-2381 


71 


Hanvey v. Henderson Willard 


1871-297 






. 1873-170 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



71 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Ru;.B 


Hardy 


1877-110 
1881-44 

1875-47 

1876-228 

1889-99 


12-1075 
41-575 

7-513 
117-1492 

12-188 
84-310 

38-104 

81-969 

89-1671 

89-2068 

116-297 

117-1164 

101-1132 

101-1133 

105-259 

105-746 

113-848 

105-746 
105-259 
113-848 

10-373 

• 

13-547 
110-861 
80-1272 

100-3013 
18-921 
40-346 
40-348 
96-1040 

76-1275 
112-1752 

109-2170 
117-1164 
114-975 


167, 173 


Harlow v. Guernsey 


125, 127 


Hamisch v. Gueniffet, Benoit, and Nicault 


130 
122, 124 


Harrington 


1870-27 
1870-30 
1870-68 

1870-37 
1870-27 
1870-68 

1877-308 
1879-198 
1870-62 
1880-69 

1887-4 




Harrington 

Harrinfirton v. Libbv 




Harris 




Harris 


24 


Harris. 


199 


Harris 




209 


Harris v. Steam and Lotz 


1902-386 
1903-207 

1903-207 

1876-170 
1879-201 
1879-7 
1889-117 

1878-58 

1902-347 
1880-191 

1896-675 
1904-129 


153 


Harris v. Steam and Lotz 


1 


Harris v. Stem and I/Otz. . . , . r , » , t ^ r t , . - 




Harrison. 


37 


Harrison , 


20 


Harrison 


142 


Harrison v. Hoean 


101, 136 


Harrison v. Morton 


c4 ' 


Harrison v Shoemaker 


122 


Harrison v. Shoemaker. ..,..,.» t r - 


139 


Harter v. Barrett 




110, 154 



72 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Hartje. . . 
Hartley. 



Hartley v. Mills. 
Hartshorn 



Hartshorn v. The Saginaw Barrel Co. 



Harvey. 



Harvey. 



Harvey v. Lubbers v. Raspillane. 



HaskeU v. Miner v. Ball. 
Hastings v. Gallagher. . . , 
Hastings v. Gallagher. . . 



Hatchman. 
Haug 



Hatiltain and Stovel 

Havemeyer, Elder and Loosey. 

Hawes 

Hawkes 



Hayden v. Phillips 

Hazelip v. Richardson. 



Heald v. Rice. 



Healey. 



Heard.. 
Heaton. 



1901-56 
1901-247 

1904-243 
1903-170 

1887-179 



1892-47 
1903-21 

1904-411 

1904-131 
1900-158 
1903-83 

1883-99 

1901-153 



1870-5 

1871-255 

1869-37 

1871-159 

1870-69 

1871-170 
1876-237 

1882-215 



1894-155 
1890-21 

1898-157 



1905- 
1879-95 



95-2485 
97-2746 
110-601 
110-2236 
104-1395 
109-2442 

38-540 

96-2579 

82-1051 

58-1257 
91-1616 
104-1655 
102-621 
102-622 
116-597 
112-1215 
121-2326 
109-2170 
93-189 
103-425 
103-1165 

25-979 

88-2243 

97-192 

103-662 

112-1215 

119-649 



10-747 
109-2444 

21-1443 
91-460 

22-1881 
78-1107 

84-1281 
92-1036 
95-633 
87-514 

114-2381 

15-1054 

101-2567 



209 
50 

104 
79 



70 



68.96.132 
133 

116, 122 

30,116 
132 



85 
96, 145 



68 
85 
66 



142 



15, 179 
37,41,70 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



73 



TITLE 



Heaton Peninsular Button Fastener Co. v. 
Eiu-eka Specialty Co. 

Hecht & Son 

Heck 

Heck 

Hedges v. Daniels 

Hedges v. Daniels 

Hedlund v. Curtis 

Hedlund v. Curtis 

Hefner Altemeck 

Heginbotham 

Heide and Wirtz 

Heinitsh and Moriarty v.Congdon v. Kdsea 

Henderson 

Henderson 

Henderson 

Henderson 

Henderson v. Noakes 

Henderson v. Noakes 

Henderson v. Reese 



CD. 



1897-216 



1901-116 

1869-19 

1871-190 

1870-126 

1889-201 

1880-9 
1880-64 

1880-64 
1880-9 

1904-515 
1905- 

1883-114 

1875-93 

1881-47 

1879-213 

1877-1 

1878-213 

187&-135 
1903-302 

1898-647 



1900-48 



1901-201 
1903-482 
1892-114 
1892-123 
1892-243 

1892-123 
1892-114 
1892-243 

1883-67 
1890-64 



O. G. 



78-171 
92-190 
80-657 
80-658 

96-1648 
97-1374 



49-559 
10(^1240 

17-152 

17-394 

113-1419 
114-544 
114-545 
23-2233 
91-1618 

8-237 



8-817 
106-542 
110-1430 

85-453 
96-425 
97-749 
91-1617 
110-602 

91-228 
97-2982 
97-958 
97-2532 

97-1599 
107-1661 

59-1431 
100-453 

98-2362 

98-2587 

59-1762 



25-191 



Rule 



12.101,126 

76 

122 
12, 122 

33.41,42 



37 
113 



41.42 

108 

113 



116 



74 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Hendy v. The Golden State & Miners Ixxm 

Works 
Henry 


1888-425 
1890-132 

1893-88 

1876-310 
1880-308 
1880-139 
1881-45 

1880-308 
1880-139 


43-1117 

64-299 
100-234 

92-2002 
102-621 

9-408 

17-569 

97-401 

123-2311 

109-1890 


41,42,48 


Henry v. The Francestown Soap-Stone Co. . 

Henry v. The Francestown Soap-Stone Co. 
Herbst v. Record and Goldboroueh v. 


118 


Rothenberg 


1904-625 

1871-216 

1876-301 

1869-23 

1869-91 

1879-784 

1887-105 
1889-118 
1890-20 
1889-135 

1903-376 
1904-293 
1877-359 
1880-630 
1880-671 

1872-135 
1904-487 


95 


H«Tnance v. Bussev. . , r 


106 


Hermann v. GilTr»or<^. , , 


81-503 
89-1670 

41-463 
91-459 
88-546 

106-1779 

111-1039 

12-753 

1-608 

113-851 

116-2009 

56-1334 

82-1988 

87-179 

87-1783 

88-388 

89-2069 

91-1617 

95-230 

88-1703 
122-1396 
108-1052 

17-1155 




Hemshein Bros. & Co. v. Hargrave & Son 
Herr 


41.63 


Herreshoff 


41,42 


Herreshoff v. Knietsch 


158,3 


HerrinfiT v. Nelson 




Herron 


65 


Hertford 


18,19,26 


HerzofiT and Wheeler 


77 


Hess and Hess 


1891-142 
1894-108 
1894-109 

1899-64 
1899-172 


79 


Heublein and Brother 




Heiisch 


10.32 


Hewitt V. Steinmetz , 


122 


Hewlett 

Hibbard v. Richmond 


1904r49 

1880-136 

1879-254 


85. 132 
142 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



75 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Hicks 


1879-200 
1903-148 


16-546 
104-309 


37 


Hicks 


42 43.46 
96. 109. 


Hicks V. Costello 


1903-123 


103-1163 






103-1164 


122. 128 






105-976 


146. 213 


Hicks V. Keating v. Purvis and Bilgram .... 


1887-40 


40-343 


122,1124 




1892-74 


117-1799 


120, 126 




1894-45 


84-984 






1893-56 






Hien 


1893-7 
1894-93 


62-316 


171 






Hien v. Buhoup 


1897-190 


81-2088 








95-1648 








99-2774 








103-658 








110-2014 




Hien v. Btihoup 


1897-772 


81-2088 








107-266 




Hien v. Pungs 


1879-263 


78-484 








80-965 








80-966 








81-2087 




Hien v. Punsrs 


1894-92 


68-667 




^^•***» V • ifc ****^^»* • •■•••••••••«•••*••••••••< 




111-1035 
95-838 




Hien v. Pungs 


1896-649 


77-1600 








78-1904 




Hien v. Shepard 


1903-293 


106-2062 


146.'213 
142 


Higgins 


1897-73 


80-2037 


Hieeins v. Keuffel 


1891-403 


66-1139 




^^«^^^^***«# » • ^ ^^* *• ■ * "^^m • ••••■• •-■••••••••••■■a 


1892-^ 


82-1209 






1892-7 


82-1210 






1892-34 


82-1211 






1893-24 


96-1856 






1893-115 


99-2968 
100-1112 
101-220 
101-2077 
103-1417 
123-1663 
109-559 




Hildreth 


1901-186 


97-1374 


96.100.10i 
106. 107 






106-1242 






107-1378 


109. 122 
126 


Hill 




121-340 


66.66 
92 


Hill and Prentice 


1883-64' 
1898-38 


24-1176 
82-1988 


Hill and Renner 








83-748 








84-507 








84-311 








110-2016 





76 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


RUEL 


Hill V.Hodge 


189&-480 


83-1211 








83-1806a 








85-1238 








87-2122 








92-1038 








95-1454 








97-1172 








116-1184 




Hill V. Montgomery, Com. of Patents 


1886-464 
1890-11 


33-757 


92 


Hill V. Wooster 


1890-230 
1891-934 


50-560 
79-1034 












83-1806b 








100-1977 




Hillard 


1871-179 

1902-413 

1870-145 

1892-11 

1892-164 




66 


Hillard v. Eckert * 


101-1831 


122, 133 


Hillebrand 


184 


Hine 


58-385 
60-576 


37.41 


Hines 


41,42,60 




65 


HinVle a^d Ashmore. ....,, ^ . - 


1899-186 
1901-236 


88-2410 
97-2742 


34 


Hinkley v. Barker 


122, 124 






99-670 








106-763 








106-767 








115-803 




Hinkson. Hev & McConalv 


1904-342 


111-2220 


20 


Hirsch & Co. v. Jennen v. Hellert & Sons v. 
Sample & Co. 




122-1724 


122 






Hisey v. Peters 


1895-349 


71-892 

6-68 

79-157 

79-1030 

79-1034 

83-1806 

86-^00 

87-893 

92-1038 

93-2320 

95-233 

95-1454 

95-1648 

103-1684 

104-1124 

123-1285 

123-1288 




Hitt 


1883-70 
1887-40 


25-192 








Hoag V. Abbott 


1879-1 


15-471 


154 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



77 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Hobbs V. Beach 

Hockhausen v. Weston 

Hobson 

Hodges 

R. Hoe & Co. and G. C. Gill v. Butterworth, 
Com. of Patents 

Hoefer, Hoefer and Hoefer v. Barnes 

Hoegh 

Hoegh V. Gordon 

Hofelt V. Reed 

Hoflf V. The Iron Clad Mfg. Co 

Hoffman 

Hoffman v. Voting 

Hoffstetter v. Kahn 

Hogan 

Hogan 

Hohorst V. The Hamburg American Packet 

Co. 
Holder 

HoUand 

Hollis 

Holly V. Union City, Ind 

Holly V. Vergennes Machine Co 

Holman v. Foley 

Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. Metro- 
politan Burglar Alarm Co. 
Holt 



1901-311 



1880-186 

1872-20 

1903-270 

1884-194 

1884-429 

1904-19 

1902-254 

1904^34 

1903-319 

1891-332 

1879-247 
1880-628 
1897-309 
1902-180 
1879-253 
1903-274 
1893-273 

1903-442 

1902-199 

189^10 

1878-305 
1880-660 
1880-661 

1880-659 

1870-97 

1871-121 

1870-169 

1884-387 

1890-11 

1884-43 

1887-62 

1889-131 

1889-235 

1890-^8 

1890-56 

1891-3 

1893-85 

1893-86 



94-2357 
87-1960 
123-323 
102-468 

18-857 
1-141 
105-1534 
1 10-601 

27-519 

108-560 
100-453 
108-797 
106-767 
55^139 
91-1240 
16-857 
18-794 
78-1107 
99-1624 
16-907 
105-1780 
63-155 

107-833 
113-548 

99-2548 

86-489 
114-262 

14-5 



18-1177 

28-1189 
2^171 



122 
37, 181 
5, 50, 51 



122 

70. 133 
119. 123 
116 



142, 145 



97,99 

41 

202 



96,97,122 
133. 134 



37 



41,66.93 
94.1164 



78 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Holt. . . 
Holub.. 
Holzer. . 
Hooper. 



Hooper 

Hooper and Clark. 
Hoosier DriU Co. v. 
Hopfeltv. Read... 
Hopkins v. LeRoy. 



Ingels. 



Hopkins v. Scott. 
Hopkinson 



Hopkinson v. Hunter. 



Horlick. 



Horton v. Stimmer. 



Hoschke... 
Hosking. . . 
Houghton. 



House V. Butler. 



1894-82 
1880-127 



1872-160 

1875-M 

1874-91 

1891-123 

1879-86 

1903-319 

1880-188 

1903-261 
1891-4 

1896-1 
1897-168 



1876-67 

1875-138 

1900-162 



1900-76 
1902-176 



1893-14 



Houston 

Houston V. Barker v. Bannester v. Eastman 



Hovey v. Huf eland. 



Hovey v. Huf eland., 
Hovey v. Muller. . . . 
Howard v. Hey 



Howard v. Hey. 
Howe 



1892-193 
1888-173 
1893-139 
1893-141 
1896-116 

1872-229 
1873-27 

1874-69 
1873-26 
1899-8 

1901-376 
I8ap-142 
1883-102 
1886-10 



68-636 

17-864 

121-1011 

2-4 

6-360 
56-929 
16-1013 
106-767 
18-869 
37-672 

105-1263 
64-264 

74-663 

85-1339 

87-1396 

98-^17 

89-1862 

81-M8 



92-2339 
113-^52 

122-1045 
91-1616 
99-1623 
99-2968 

123-1663 

62-687 
85-289 
85-288 

60-1609 
44-697 



2-493 

6-31 
3-149 
86-184 
98-386 
96-1647 
123-1285 
26-1189 



37 
41 

66,66 
37 

37 

68 
20 

122, 124 
110,113 

30,31,122 
41,42,166 
174 



37 

122 

46 
47 



68 
169 



110, 126 

11 
93, 142 



146 
34,60 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



79 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Howe Machine Co. v. The National 
Needle Co.; The Howe Machine Co. v. 
Whitten 

Howes V. McNeal 



Howland. 



Howlett 

.Howley, Inre. . 

Hoyt 

Hoyt V. Home. 



Hoyt V. Scenders v. Hawthorne. 
Huber v. Aiken 



Hubel V. Dick; Hubel v. Tucker. 



Huber v. Nelson Mfg. Co. 
Huber v. Nelson Mfg. Co. 



Huebel v. Bernard. 



Huenefeld. 



Hughes.. 
Hulbert. 

Hulbert. 



Hulett V. Long . 



1890-281 



1880-372 
1881-1568 

1877-120 



1902-338 



1902-319 
1892-436 



189^166 



1886-362 

1896-58 

1883-158 

1891-25 

1891-120 

1891-160 

1890-45 

1889-601 
1893-279 

1893-277 
1895-19 

1900-223 



1902-69 

1902-290 

1891-148 

1893-74 

1893-75 

1894-1 



1899-446 



61-476 

87-2121 

80-520 

17-799 



12-889 
40-917 
80-362 

100-2776 

121-691 

100-2177 

69-1764 

97-554 

119-1261 

88-1626 

94-223 
101-1608 

36-939 



47-1732 

63-311 

87-1785 
105-1261 

90-761 

103-427 
110-1726 

98-1968 

110^09 

66-1448 

63-1687 



66-316 

81-2081 

81-2087 

101-1832 

89-1141 

95-1454 
114-2383 
117-1496 



41 



70. 133 

37 

41.42 



113 
110,118' 



142 
37 



70. 78, 



80 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



HuU. 



HuU. 



HuU V. Hallberg. 
Hull V. Lowden.. 



HuU V. McGill. 
Hume 



Hummel 

Hummel v. Tingley. 



Humphrey v. Fickert. 
Humphrey v. Fickert. 
Hunt 



Hunt. 



Hunt V. King 

Hunt V. McCaslin. 



Htmt V. Woods. 
Hunter 



Hunter. 
Hunter. 
Htmter. 
Hunter. 
Htmter. 
Hunter. 
Hunter. 



Hunter 

Hunter v. Jenkin. 



Htmter v. Miller. 



1869-68 

1870-111 

1889-229 

1880-73 

1876-17 

1872-65 

1876-15 
1889-229 

1904-200 
1881-30 



1891-168 
1894-35 

1900-15 
1900-22 



1904-447 



1878-149 
1880-73 

1879-53 
1880-73 

1880-22 
1897-401 

1869-34 
1889-218 
1890-111 
1889-250 

1891-122 

1891-198 

1892-136 

1892-149 

1892-192 

1894-34 

1897-161 



1891-157 
1892-9 
1892-10 
1892-187 

1890-42 



9-1 

110-1428 
20-741 

117-597 
57-123 

94-583 

90-959 

105-1781 

113-2506 

112-2094 

115-803 

13-771 

15-831 

17-200 
79-861 
86-800 



28, 122 
94,95,116 
142 
119 
171 

25 
66 



125 
142 
165 



49-733 



56-929 

57-999 

59-1922 

60-295 

60-1477 

66-1449 

81-504 

82-894 

116-1731 
56-1705 



50-1765 
89-921 



110 



116 
75 



5. 6, 171 

196 

42 

41,42 

56 

171 

142 

1,77 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



81 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Himter v. Stikeman. 



Htmter v. Wightman. 



Huntley v. Smith. 



Hurlbut. 



Huson V. Crowell v. Yates. 



Huson V. Yates. 



Hussey v. Van Wagenen 

Hutin and Leblanc v. Steinmetz v. Scott v. 

Fairfax 
Hutt V. Phillips V. Foglesong 



Huttner v. Knox. 



Hyde 

Hyde 

Ilgner 

Illinois Watch Case Co. v. Elgin National 

Watch Co. 
Imhaeuser v. Buerk 



1898-564 



1897-175 



Incandescent Lamp Patent Consoli- 
dated Electric Light Co. v. McKeesport 

Light Co. 
Independent Electric Co. v. Jeffrey Mfg. Co. 



1880-182 
1889-38 

1890-136 
1891-233 
1891-80 

1893-107 



1895-45 

1876-199 
1901-240 

1892-190 



1879-281 
1880-177 
1889-153 

1871-109 
1890-41 



1899-386 



1880-362 



1895-675 



1897-287 



85-610 
88-1161 

114-544 
94-1186 
92-1234 
88-1706 
99-666 

113-848 

81-1788 

97-2548 
110-2015 
108-799 
92-2003 
92-382 
91-1788 
91-1436 

18-795 
23-2325 

52-1062 



64-1006 
88-2409 
95-2686 

72-1201 
84-1143 

106-1241 
10-942 
97-2743 

105-264 

60-1477 
84-1434 
86-184 

16-1046 



29-177 
50-1293 
122-1721 
87-2323 
94-715 

17-795 
87-1962 

73-1289 
80-521 

78-797 
97-2979 



97 



114,133 



75 



116, 159 
124 



142, 144 



37,65 

41 

171 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



IngersoU. 



IngersoU v. Holt 

Ingoldsby v. Bellows 

Ingoldsby v. Bellows 

Ingraham 

Innis V. The Oil City Boiler Works. 



In re Adam 

In re Lowry 

In re Mills 

International Tooth Crown Co. v. Rich- 
mond 



Ives 

Ives and Green v. Hamilton. 



Ives V. Sargent. 



Jackson v. Cuntz . . 
Jackson v. Knapp. 



Jackson v. Nichols. 

Jacobson 

Jaeger 



James v. Campbell ; Clexton v. Campbell . . 



Janssen 

Jean and Goode v. Hitchcock. 



Jeffers v. Dachemin. 
Jenkins 



Jenkins 

Jenkins v. Barney and Berry . 



1870-38 
1870-132 

1899-253 
1904-554 



1871-164 
1885-197 



1900-1 



1887-425 

1891-181 

1894-93 

1892-57 

1892-147 

1892-148 

1878-134 
1876-459 

1887-191 
1887-390 



1900-281 



1871-278 



1889-121 
1892-214 

1882-67 

1889-238 

1894-155 



1902-342 



1870-93 
1873-141 
1873-169 
1874-53 

1890-161 
1893-97 

1873-19 



90-2507 
113-2214 
116-2532 



30-998 

97-401 
106-999 

90-445 
117-904 

39-1550 
10^543 
114-1265 
106-543 

96-1038 

15-385 
10-336 
97-554 

38-781 

115-510 
91-1034 
103-659 



40 
122 
122 
88 



94 
97 
94, 126 



107-1378 
46-1637 

21-337 
21-1443 
22-1881 
91-459 
92-384 
122-1050 

120-2126 
100-3011 
100-3012 
104-1896 



37 



122 



93,94,122 
37.64.68 
37 

85 



102, 132 
133 

125 



4-351 

53-759 

3-119 
7-605 



97.124,125 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



83 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Jenkins v. Jenkins and Armat. 
Jenks 



Jenne v. Brown v. Booth. 



Jennens 

Jenner v. Dickinson. 
Jennings v. Kibbe . . 



Jerome. 



Jerome 

Jewett 

Jljinsky 

Jobes V. Roberts v. Hauss. 



Johnson. 
Johnson. 



Johnson v. Chisholm. 

Johnston 

Johnston 

Johnston 



Johnston. 
Johnston. 



Johnston v. Pimlott. 



Johnston v. Woodbury. 

Jones 

Jones 



Jones 

Jones V. Greenleaf . 
Jones V. Larter. . . . 

Jones V. Starr 

Jones V. Starr 

Jopling 



1897-202 
1898-81 



1892-78 
1904-58 



1882-343 
1893-328 

1873-11 

1892-29 
1887-17 
1889-192 
1899-53 

1891-16 
1899-212 



1880-207 
1887-64 
1889-130 
1890-11 

1892-150 
1900-125 



1870-44 
1871-121 

1901-486 

1874-53 

1898-155 



1903-81 
1879-23 
1900-111 
1904-344 



78-1902 
83-1513 
89-1344 
83-1994 
97-1373 

59-158 
114-264 

108-1587 

116-1181 

22-331 

3-64 
60-837 

58-945 

38-781 

48-1399 

86-1805 

86-1918 

54-505 
89-1341 
105-262 

115-633 
18-1052 
40-574 
46-1641 

60-295 
92-1798 

92-1235 

98-2364 

100-2177 



1875-153 
1876-31 



97-402 
5-585 
84-1281 
90-1949 
85-609 

103-228 

16-560 

92-383 

111-2221 

117-1495 

8-1032 



41,42 
125 



142 

78,18 

41,42 



37.64.68 
75, 133. 
145 

65 

37, 171 

68 

76 

36 

42,75 

116 

50 
133, 139 



20,25 
104, 127 
66 
159 

159. 171 
41 



84 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


C. G. 


O. D. 


Rule 


Tosselvn v. Swezev ; . . 


1879-15 

1880-122 

1904-232 

1879-606 

1879-208 

1893-44 

1896-45 

1904-203 

1877-10 

1877-56 

1869-14 


15-702 

17-801 

110-2016 

16-171 

63-152 

110-1430 
11-110 

118-836 
119-1924 


142 


love 


50, 56 


Tudd V. CarnDbell 


124, 126 


Tudson V. Bradford 




Juengst V. Boyer and Lord 




June V. Linn , 


113 


Jtinker and Wolf 


41 


Kaczander v. Hodges and Hodges 

Kafer and Gould v. Dennison 


122 
122 


Kahn 


116-2008 

9-105 

84-310 

84-1142 

108-290 

111-1628 

83-1993 
84-1870 
89-2068 
98-230 

64-1397 
88-1157 
113-849 
106-1778 
110-1724 
114-2384 
115-252 
118-834 
122-2066 

84-145 
96-841 
97-2085 

101-2825 
101-1372 


81 


Kane & Co 


1876-23 
1898-146 

1898-108 

1893-120 
1899-143 

1898-616 

1902-473 

1902-394 

1870-69 

1876-93 

1877-44 

1876-140 

1876-103 

1877-18 

1901-155 
1883-72 




Kane v. Brill and Adams 




KaoD 




•*-^**t'xr 

Karff 


41,42 


Kasson v. Hetherington 


49 


Kaufmann and Blache 




Keech v. Birmingham 


110 


Keen and Williams 


170 


Keith 


88 


Keith - 


9-744 

97-551 

2&-289 

122-729 

14-673 


37, 133 


Keith 


70, 133 


Keith V. Faure 


120, 121 
126 


Kfelboum V. Hirmer 


Kelleher v. Darling 


1878-381 
1889-145 









PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



85 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



KeUer. 



Keller and Olmesdahl v. Felder. 
Keller v. Stolzenbach 



1892-238 

1876-246 
1884-174 



Kellogg 

Kellogg Switchboard & Supply Company 
Kelly V. Fynn 



Kelly V. Fynn. 



Kemp 

Kempshall v. Seiberling. 
Kempshall v. Seiberling. 
Kempshall v. Seiberling. 



Kendall. 



Kendall v. Frasch 

Kenerson v. Brown and Brown. 
Kenny, Sr 



Kenny, Sr. 



1900-118 
1900-1237 

1900-339 
1900-1233 

1879-41 
1903-169 
1903-428 
1904-197 

1900-174 



1890-36 

1879-249 

1869-97 

1870-145 

1889-107 

1896-96 

1870-145 

1870-124 



Kenny 

Kenny and Thordarson v O'Connell v. 
Baird v, Schmidt 

Kent 

Kent '. 

Kenyon v. Wesson 



Kenyon v. Wesson. 



Kephart. 
Kem. . . . 
Kerr. . . . 
Kerr. . . . 



Kerr 

Keystone Bridge Co. v. The Phoenix Iron 
Co 



1871-301 

1880-116 

1871-10 

1871-91 

1871-91 

1872-205 

1871-10 

1903-137 

1903-292 

1884-27 

1890-166 

1892-219 

1892-61 

1877-384 

1880-91 
1881-14 



61-1790 
105-262 

10-944 

27-209 

80-^13 

120-2764 

123-2310 

92-1233 

112-727 

114-764 

92-1237 
123-1285 

16-776 
104-1396 
107-641 
110-1427 

93-764 
97-192 
98-2171 

60-32 
16-867 



119-2237 
117-1163 



17-686 



103-1914 

106-2061 

28-96 

63-919 

68-1663 
11-980 



76 



101, 163 



16,36,43 
6 



60 

124 

12, 126 
6,119,122 

147 
66.68,134 



114 

121, 164 
191 



36,68 
167 

37 

37,41 

142 

110, 117 



126 

79 

133 



41.42 



86 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Keystone Chamois Co. 



Kidd... 
Kidde.. 
Kieffer. 
Kieth.. 



Kilbourne v. Bingham Co. 

Kilboume v. Himer 

King 



King. 



King V. Babendreier v. Libby. 
King V. Galium 



King V. Hansen 

Kinnear 

Kinney 

Kinney 

Kinny v. Goodhue . . 
Kinny and Schultz. . 
Elinsman v. Stxx>hm. 

Kintner 

Kinyon v. Carter. . . . 



Kirchner v. Blair. 

Kirkbride 

Kirk V. DuBois. . . 



JCissner. 



Kitsee v. Robertson. 

Kitson 

Kittle V.Hall 



1902-486 

1903-240 

1903-278 

1902-360 

1876-93 

1877-44 

1877-18 

1876-140 

1876-103 

1876-104 

1876-94 

1892-477 
1894-107 



1870-109 
1871-305 
1871-306 

1889-3 
1890-134 

1899-252 
1883-454 
1890-67 

1902-378 
1890-54 
1892-172 
1904-240 



101-3109 
103-892 

105^745 

105-1782 

101-449 



.1901-22 
1894-2 



1878^47 
1876-123 
1888-196 
1888-1528 

1890-164 
1891-128 

1901-221 

1881-49 

1887-329 



60 

41, 42, 68 
70 



60-577 

122-729 
124-319 



46-119 

89-2653 

25-980 

87-1610 

101-1129 

51-156 

60-737 

110-2235 

123-1663 

121-2325 

120-2127 

98-581 

66-513 

83-743 

83-746 

13-364 
9-1109 
42-297 

53-919 

97-2306 

20-1750 

39-707 

117-2086 



124 



122 



113 
80 
34 
30,70,133 
124 
68 

142. 171 
41,42 



123, 126 
139 



70 

122, 213 
37,64,133 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



87 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Klaus 

Klein v. Groebli. 
Klemm.. 



Klepelko v. Becker 

Kletzker and Goesel v. Dodson. 



Kletzker and Goesel v. Dodson. 
Klingelfuss 



Kliissmann 

Knapp V. Morss; Ufford v. Morss. 



Kneedler v. Shephard. 
Kneeland v. Sheriff. . . . 



Knight V. Annan 

Knight V. Bagnell v. Curtis v. Morgan. 



Knothe. 



Knott. . . , 
Knowles., 

Knudsen. 



1893-87 
1904-140 
1903-640 
1903-54 



1904-100 



1904-110 
103-192 



Kny 

Koechlin and Witt v. Marble, Com. of 
Patents 



Koen V. Quint 
Kohler 



1893-651 

1903-180 
1880-583 

1871-34 
1896-109 

1903-42 



1875-96 

1870-161 

1875-152 

1895-29 
1897-169 



1893-131 
1882-442 



1883-26 
1888-60 

1873-84 



Kohler. 
Kohler. 



64-299 
110-305 
103-1682 
111-2220 

120-658 

109-1336 

116-595 

120-904 

120-2126 

110-305 

104-2149 

105-2149 

123-2311 
65-1593 
80-965 

104-1895 
18-242 
80-360 



76-1115 

102-1294 
103-1417 
109-2442 
104-1396 
105-2061 

8-238 



72-589 

113-548 
81-967 
81-969 

65-1403 
22-1365 
82-894 
84-1729 

23-1329 



4-53 

21-1111 

116-596 

116-1185 

118-2252 



65,66 
124, 157 



122 

114. 123 

122. 124 



124 
29 

171 



114 



116 

15,18,19 
119. 124 
24,65 



42 



37,81 



41,42 



159 



83 
83 



88 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Kohler v. Kohler and Chambers. 



Kolb V. Hemingway v. Curtis. 

Kook 

Koritski and Wipf 

Kouns 

Kozminski 

Krakaw v. Harding 

iCrakaw v. Harding 

JCrake 



Krause. 



Krause. 
Krejci . 
KreU... 



Krementz v. Cottle Co. 



Krementz v. The S. Cottle Co. 



Kroeninger 

Kugler 

Kuhlewind 

Kuhn 

Kurz 

Kurz 

Kurz V. Jackson and Pierce. 



Kyle 

Lass and Sponenburg v. Scott. 



Lacroix and Welch. 
LaFlare v. Chase. . . 



LaFlare v. Chase . 



1888-19 

1891-145 

1889-221 

1896-32 

1893-63 

1892-73 



1879-202 

1904-498 

1887-139 

1903-42 

1903-264 

1903-484 

1869-100 

1870-69 

1870-70 

1871-169 

1870-158 

1891-164 



1904-292 



1888-139 
1894-105 

1889-606 

1894-521 

1900-84 

1902-84 

1902-481 

1892-46 

1904-557 



1902-106 



1890-84 



1873-155 
1895-32 

1896-285 



43-247 

109-805 

110-1429 

92-2508 

99-1865 

122-1397 

16-543 
113-1145 
41-1271 
103-429 
105-1531 
107-1662 



56-1708 

85-454 

93-552 

111-39 
121-1011 
44-1505 

48-1775 

78-865 

69-241 

88-2411 

91-2002 

98-2173 

101-3107 

58-1256 

113-2215 

119-961 

98-2586 

110-2235 

113-548 

51-1621 
101-1829 
122-354 
123-1665 

4-526 

72-741 

92-1233 

74-1735 

112-1480 

113-1708 



93,94,101 



122, 153 

37 

171 

22 

30 

116 

107, 126 

133 



50,51 



41,42 
69, 171 



1 

41,42 

77 

133,145 

81 

30, 171 

122 



7.51 



93. 106 



110 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



89 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



LaFrance. 
Lahue 



Lake v. Cahill 

Lalance and Grosjean Mfg. Co. v. Harber- 
mann Mfg. Co. 

Lambert 

Lamson v. Wardwell 



1903-215 
1902-357 

1904-241 
1893-167 



Landenberger. 

Landes 

Landis 

Landreth: . . . . 



Lanfrey 

Langdon and Batcheller. 



Langerfeld 

Lanstrom 

Lapham v. Bettendorf . 



Larson. 



Larter v. Jones . 
Laskey 



Lasscell 

Lasscell 

Latham v. Armat. 



Latham v. Force and Parenteau. 



Latham v. Force and Parenteau. 



1870-33 
1870-34 

1902-184 
1903-134 
1903-127 
1885-90 



1881-39 
1892-208 



1903-175 
1880-118 
1879-118 

1902-452 

1900-111 
1889-181 
1891-17 

1884-42 
1884-66 
1901-337 



1898-1 
1898-32 



1898-32 
1898-1 



105-262 
101-448 
101-1832 

110-2235 
62-452 
79-2196 

119-1925 



99-1806 
103-1681 
103-1164 
31-1441 
84-1871 
85-287 

20-892 
61-286 
86-1803 
86-1804 

104-1655 
17-744 
16-137 
83-1208 

101-2568 

101-2569 

92-383 

48-539 

113-548 

28-1274 

29-861 

95-232 

104-1124 

115-252 

95-1454 

123-1288 

82-185 

92-2339 

92-2340 

87-181 

113-2215 

100-3013 

105-1533 

lOg-1067 

82-1690 
87-2121 
87-1690 
89-1344 
117-280 



77 
65 

122 



24 



188, 209 
50 
68, 171 



75 



66 
133 



49,70 

126 
37, 133 

18,37,171 
37, 171 
146 



90 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Latimer 

Latour v. Ltindell 

Lattig and Goodrum v. Dean. 
Lattig and Goodrum v. Dean. 
Lattig and Goodrum v. Dean. 
Lauder v. Crowell 



Laughlin v. Reuleaux. . 
Laurent-Cely v. Payen , 



Laverly v. Flagg. 



Law 

Law 

Law V. Woolf . 



Lawly 

Lawrence. 



1889-123 
1904-266 



Lawrence Mfg. Co. v. Tennessee Mfg. Co 



Lawson 

Lawther v. Hamilton 
Lawther v. Hamilton 

Lawton 

Lay 

Lay V. Ballard 

Learned 

Leavitt 

Leblanc 



1879-177 
1890-8 
1881-10 
1879-335 

1900-146 

1890-68 

1893-15 



1879-303 

1877-119 
1904-292 
1891-91 



1904-639 
1898-142 

1891-416 



1902-419 



1884-414 
1888-209 

1888-209 

1895-68 

1895-71 

1901-142 

1903-601 

1873-94 

1876-54 

1893-84 
1873-27 
1901-1 



46-1638 

122-1046 

111-301 

116-606 

117-1798 

16-406 

97-2979 

79-511 

90-961 

92-2002 
61-621 

93-940 
86-184 
86-183 
89-265 
89-263 

16-1141 

12-940 
111-1039 
66-1627 
86-183 
97-1837 

113-1967 
84-1141 
88-2242 

66-1628 

91-820 

95-230 

87-1783 

95-230 

101-1833 

113-852 

114-2091 

29-449 



42-487 



97-187 
98-2171 

107-2237 
3-687 

63-1962 



37 

122 

86. 133 

126 

126 

33,46,66 

168 

110, 114 

117 

2, 171 



97. 107, 

110 

41 

41,42.78 

122 



41,42,68 



30, 209 



58, 



66,66,68 
,146,171 



98-226 



41,42 
93,94 
139 (a) 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



91 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Lee. 



Lee 

Lee 

Lee 

Lee 

Lee and Smith. 
Lee V. Walsh. u . 



Leeson & Co. 



Lefever 

Lefever v. Remington & Sons. 



Leggett 

Leggett V. Avery 

Leggett V. Standard Oil Co. 
Lehmann 



Lehnbeuter v. Holthaus. 



Leilich 

Lemire 

Lemp V. Ball 

Lemp V. Mudge. 



Lemp V. Mudge. 



Lemp V. Randall and Bates. 
Lendl 



Leonius 

Leonard v. Runyon and IngersoU. 
Lesler 



1872-86 
1872-126 

1879-12 

1882-6 

1902-234 

1903-331 

1874-14 

1879-29 

1880-177 

1892-153 

1904-206 
1882-467 

1872-182 

1880-283 

1893-345 

1870-70 

1872-244 

1878-125 

1875-106 

1875-61 

1882-263 
1893-327 



1904-21 
1902-396 



1904-387 



1903-126 
1870-56 



1-435 

15-512 

23-342 

100-233 

106-999 

5-58 

15-563 

60-297 
101-1834 

110-1430 
22-1537 
83-1802 

2-199 
6-837 

17-445 
93-1125 

63-1201 
96-2579 



21-1783 
92-1233 
94-2167 
87-1959 
9a-229 

108-561 

101-1607 

115-249 

112-727 

114-763 

114-764 

114-763 

118-1936 
119-2520 

123-319 
115^250 
103-1164 



Lesner 1871-204 



117-2631 



37 

85 

41,64,68 

37,42 

171 

107, 144 

209 

68. 171 



37,41 



66,69,145 
41 
109, 133 



37,94 

145 

65 

116 

68 

66 



92 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Letellier. 



Levenstein and Naif. 



Lewis. 
Lewis . 

Lewis. 
Lewis . 



Lewis V. Unger. 



Ligowsky v. Peters v. Hisey. 
Lillie 



LilHe 

Limp V. Randall and Bates 

Limp V. Randall and Bates v. Thomson. 

Linde 

Lindemeyr v. Hoffman 



Linden. 



Lindsay v. McDonough. 



Lindstrom v. Lipschutz. 

Lindstrom v. Lipschutz. 
Lipe V. Miller 



Lipe V. Miller. 
Lipe V. Miller. 



Lipe V. Miller. 



1897-171 



1904-217 

1871-82 
1891-61 

1900-181 
1904-16 



1891-220 
1890-181 
1891-64 



1901-363 



1869-108 
1870-51 

1891-98 



1903-266 



1903-483 
1903-16081 



1904-114 



81-1611 
91-2372 
92-1619 

110-1726 
115-1584 



64-1890 
84-311 

93-1311 
108-669 
108^1589 
106-643 
106-1508 
115-804 

67-1693 
63-2041 

114-641 
123-319 

120-906 
116-1329 
96-838 
99-^9 
110-1432 
115-252 



66-1402 
106-768 
99^62 

120-904 
121-1977 

121 . 1977 
106-1632 
113-2215 
109-1067 
111-222 

107-1662 
109-1608 
115-1330 
116-1732 
123-1990 

109-1608 
115-1330 
116-1732 
123-1990 



139 



46 

88 
79 

26 

42,66,69 
146 
30,43,171 
163 

36 
41,42,48 

70, 171 
94 

114 
69, 171 



30 



136 



16 
122, 163 



121 



126 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



93 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Lipman 


1872-61 
1872-134 

1879-212 


1-304 

16-632 
122-351 
85-1221 
96-1855 
86-1985 
91-1617 

10-543 
40-344 

12-186 
3-379 

20-1747 

119-2235 

112-251 
2-674 

16-1140 

94-432 
124-317 
124-317 

20-671 
100-453 

89-1672 
9-837 

110-857 

76-1711 

43-1347 

97-2744 
83-1804 
83-1806a 

16-1141 
4-582 
25-1189 
104-581 




Lippincott 


42,46,89 


Lipscomb v. Pfeiffer 


101 


Little & Co 


1898-652 
1876-207 

1877-88 

1877-37 

1873-63 

1875-68 

1874-118 

1874-57 

1881-42 




Little V. Lillie» Pillard and Sargent 


94, 101 


Little V. Sargent 


122, 123 
124, 126 
145, 153 


Little V. SteDhenson 




Livingston 


42,46,167 


Litincrstrom , 


171, 175 

176 

35,37,41 


Lloyd 


1904-373 
1872-253 
1873-74 

1879-311 
1901-267 


64,68 
81,82,83 


Llovd V. Knfifenian 


98,99,126 


Locke 


92 


Locke 


124 


Locke V. Baldwin 


122, 124 


Locke V. Crebbin 




125 


Locke V. Levalley v. Ewart 


1881-26 

1902-253 

1899-228 

1876-104 

1879-171 

1904-170 

1896-40 

1888-56 

1891-11 

1891-103 

1891-111 

1879-308 
1873-165 
1883-104 
1903-152 


93,94,95 


Lockwood V. Schmidt 


113 


Loeben v. Hamrick 


110 


Loeser 


37 


Loewenbach 


65 


Loewer v. Ross 




Lombard 


96 


Lomont v. Kromer 


121 


Lones, Vernon and Holden 


37 


Loner 


66 


Long 


26, 170 



94 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Loomis V. Hauser. 



Loomis V. Hauser. 



Loppenstein. 
Lord 



Lorentz. 



Loring V. HaU. 



Lorraine v. Thurmond. 



Lorraine v. Thtirmond. 

Lotterhand v. Hanson. 
Lotterhand v. Hanson. 



Lottridge V. Eustice 

Lovejoy 

Lovejoy v. Cady 

Lovell Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Cary. 



Lovrien v. Banister. 



Lowry and Cowley v. Spoon 

Lowry v. Duell, Com. of Patents . 

Lowry v. Spoon 

Lowry v. Spoon 

Lowry v. Spoon 



1902-131 
1902-530 



1902-630 
1902-131 



1890-16 

1890-30 

1891-3 

1891-5 

1891-76 

1891-206 

1890-101 

1892-77 



1879-8 

187^163 

1880-144 

1890-86 
1896-11 
1891-29 

1890-140 
1891-19 

1904-39 
1904-646 



1904-52 
1893-243 

1880-162 

Lowe 1870-39 

Lowry \ 1869-85 

1879-186 
Lowry 



1900-1 



1899-410 
1904-173 
1904-400 



99-448 
118--834 
113-848 
110-1432 

99-1172 
115-252 
118-589 
111-1364 

122-1723 
60-987 
91-1615 

106-2292 
91-460 
88-546 



59-168 

80-1892 

88-2066 

16-471 



61-1781 



62-1949 
4991-1949 

108-799 
110-861' 
114-1265 

121-689 
108-1053 
123-664 
62-1821 
92-1038 

18-299 
109-805 

20-176 



90-445 

122-2687 
88-717 
110-858 
112-732 
117-903 



6,110 



68 
41 



6.6 
66,114,127 



110 



131 

77, 146 
125 



28,93,94 
101 

37,41,66 
29,66 

97, 103. 

108, 122 

101, 122 

66 

116 

124 

153 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



95 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Lowrie V. Taylor and Taylor • 




123-1665 
123-1991 


110 


Ludington. 


1902-241 


100-236 


31 


Lusrer v. Brownine 


1902-230 


100-231 


95, 122 


Lufirer v. Brownine 


1904-693 


104-1123 


96 


^^ ^M-^^^^A w ■ ^^A ^^ »» M^^^m^^ «««vv««pva«*»B«wv«w«vv 




106-2018 








113-«51 








114-2383 








123-1288 








123-2313 




Lueoldshv v. Bellows 




116-2532 


128 


LunlCCTl ,.....,.,. T r - ,. r ^ - T T T - t T T - - 


1896-22 
1874-40 


76-785 
5-489 


79,81 


Lupton 


37 




1889-139 






Luttig and Goodnun v. Dean 




117-1798 


122 


Lutz V. Lewis 


1904-227 


110-2014 

116-2011 

2-705 


97, 116 


Lux 


3,63 


Lvman. 


1872-262 




M^J «UW** •. 


1874-49 






Lynch and Rabl v. Dryden and Underwood 


1873-73 


3-407 


37. iOl, 




1881-15 




122, 126 




1880-630 






Lyons 


1902-430 


101-2078 


41 


J 




109-1609 




McArthur v. Gilbert 


1904r-314 
1900-248 


111-1624 
90-2295 
92-2340 


122, 126 


McBerty v. Cook 


65, 109 










94-224 








94-986 








95-838 








100-2386 








104-1124 








105-977 








106-1241 








107-267 








112-955 








114-766 








114-1553 








114-2383 








121-1351 








121-2668 




McBride v. Kemp 


1904-89 
1900-186 


109-1070 

93-1917 

101-1832 


123 


McCallum v. Bremer 


101. 142 




143. 154 


McChesley v. Kruger 


1902-349 


101-219 


124 


McClain 


^ %^'\^mm \^ ^\M 


119-1585 
57-1129 


37 


McClain v. Ortmayer 


1891-532 






1896-61 


79-1034 
83-1802 
87-2121 





96 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


McClellan 


1892-125 
1895-30 


59-1763 


133 






McClintock 


1870-64 

1871-144 

1871-325 










McClintock 


1871-325 








1870-64 






McCloskey 


1876-24 


9-299 




McClure v. Miller & Mason 


1870-122 
1871-144 
1873-170 
1879-28 






1 




McCombs 


1903-283 
1904-575 


105-2057 
113-2508 


133, 145 


McCormick 


65,66 


McCormick 




116-1183 


26, 196 


McCormick and Baker 


1871-246 








1874-49 






McCormick v. Cleal 


1897-55 


80-1614 
82-1418 
92-1235 




McCormick v. Cleal 


1898-492 


83-1514 

88-1706 

92-381 

94-2561 

99-666 

113-1145 

114-2384 

120-2444 




McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. 


1898-398 


92-1988 




Aultman & Co. ; McCormick Harvesting 
Machine Co. v. The Aultman & Miller 
Co. 




92-2004 
96-2585 
100-449 




McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. 


1890-336 


51-1130 




Minneapolis Harvester Works 


1891-25 
1891-226 


84-921 




McCoy 


1897-74 


80-2037 


47 


McCtillough V, Watkins 


1875-129 


8-1074 


110 


McCully 


1874-76 

1877-110 

1881-42 


6-153 
41-575 


175 






McDermott v. Hildreth 


1902-43 


98^1282 
100-453 
100-685 
100-1332 


113 






McDonald 


1893-99 


64-857 


133 




1894-2 






McDonald 


1902-408 


101-1829 


7, 17, 50 








51 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



97 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



McDonald v. Gray v. Bell v. Edison . 



McDougall. 
McDougall. 



McElroy. . . 
McFarlane. 



McGarrell 

McGenniss 

McGiU V. Adams. 

McGowan 

McGuire 



McHarg v. Schmidt and Mayland. 

McHarg v. Schmidt et al 

Mclntire 

McKay v. Dibert 



McKean v. Morse. 
McKee v. Baker. . 



McKnight 

McKnight v. Pohle andXroasdale. 



McKnight v. VanWagenen 

McLaughlin v. People's Ry. Co. 



McLean v. Fleming. 



McLellan. 
McMahan. 



McMillen v. Rees. 



McMurray. 
McNeil.... 



McNeil. 



1889-9 

1880-147 
1882-7 
1886-10 
1889-247 

1902-467 
1896-37 

1892-45 
1902-422 



1892-168 
1898-134 

1903-216 

1903-378 

1876-34 

1881-238 

1889-144 

1901-33 



1901-238 
1903-220 

1876-126 
1884-402 

1878-262 



1872-162 
1889-169 
1890-24 
1890-41 
1890-42 

1880-476 
1880-144 

1876-134 
1901-313 



1902-313 



46-1246 

18-130 
21-1783 
22-1875 
35-627 

101-2823 
76-1418 
108-2145 
68-1256 
101-2076 
119-1269 
60-736 
84-983 
93-940 
105-263 
106-1780 
9-300 
19-1361 
91-460 
94-1672 
120-667 
30-1092 
97-2742 
105-977 
119-2520 
9-1161 
29-277 
80-813 

13-913 
80-813 
91-230 
95-230 

2-89 
48-266 



17-1222 
40-574 
8-943 
100-1976 
100-2178 
117-2365 

100-1976 
100-2178 
117-2365 



6, 6. 94, 
144 
37,41,133 



172 
26 

66 
77 

116, 124 
139 



113, 145 

119 

37 



120 
122 

69 
96 



1,37 
41,42 



37 
76 



98 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



McNeil. 



McRoy. 



McPherson 

McTammany. 



1902-563 



1869-58 
1870-122 



1900-168 



McTammany and Wright. 

McWiUiams 

Macey v. Laning v. Casler 
MacDonald v. Edison 

MacDonald v. Edison 

MacDonald v. Edison 

MacDonald v. Edison 



Macey v. Tabey v. Laning 

MacKaye 

MacKay v. Jackman; MacKay v. Scott 

Sole Sewing Machine Co.; MacKay v. 

Lehman 

MacLaughlin 

MacLaughlin 

MacLay 



Macmaster. 
Macphail 



1903-105 
1871-177 
1902-399 
1902-242 



1902-622 



1903-243 



1903-622 



1901-168 
1903-112 
1882-303 
1889-144 
1890-165 
1890-166 

1891-67 
1891-68 



1889-220 

1891-145 

1892-73 

1893-63 

1896-33 

1897-61 
1891-134 



100-2178 

101-^449 
121-692 



117-275 
93-751 
94-431 
108-2144 
108-2145 
112-1752 
113-851 
113-1972 

103-661 



101-1608 
105-973 
105-1264 
118-589 

105-1263 
105-973 
115-252 
118-834 

105-973 

105-1264 

105-1265 

105-1263 

105-973 

115-252 

118-834 

121-1351 

97-1173 
103-888 
22-85 



56-836 

65-864 

109-806 

123-2310 

49-1043 



80-1476 
89-706 

56-1062 



201 
26 



34,56 
66 
145. 128 



122, 128 
41,42 



5 
5 



76 



171 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



99 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Macphail. 



Macphail v. Reiner. 



Macwilliam. 

Maddtix 

Mahlecke. . . 
Mahn 



Mahn v. Harwood. 



Mahn v. Harwood. 



Mahnken 

Maloney v. Kidwell. 
Maltby v. Miehle 



Manafield and Hayes 

Manitowoc Mfg. Co. v. Dickerman. 



Manke & Co. 
Mann , 



Mann v. Bayliss. 
Manny 



Manny v. Easley v. Greenwood . 



1899-194 
189^196 

1899-196 
1899-194 

1902-336 
1903-312 
1892-207 
1898-698 



1885-144 
1885-151 
1890-11 
1894-27 

1885-151 
1885-144 

1887-83 

1879-311 

1898-11 



1902-94 
1891-239 
1892-210 
1893-105 

1893-137 
1880-57 
1878-409 
1879-521 

1876-509 
1888-106 
1890-113 

1889-179 
1891-15 



89-521 

89-521 
92-190 

100-2774 
106-764 
61-285 
82-1210 
96-1856 
98-2366 
100-1113 

30-657 
92-384 
96-2579 
97-2979 
105-1259 

30-660 



40-915 

16-1139 

82-749 

84-1730 

86-2171 

98-2363 
57-1721 
92-189 

63-1687 

17-330 

13-273 

22-1205 

25-193 

10-789 
44-700 



48-538 
78-1904 
86-490 
86-491 
86-1636 
88-2409 
89-1862 
96-844 
97-1172 
98-415 
107-1098 
110-603 



8,20 

5,164,179 
68 
65 



85 
129 



41,42 



65 



122, 124 



100 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Manofime-Pidfireon Iron Co 


1901-214 


97-2084 
99-1623 
100-684 
110-309 

121-687 
108-796 
121-2664 

24r-101 

108-2145 
70-632 
95-443 

102-622 
103-1914 

116-328 
116-2534 
119-327 
119-328 

116-1723 
116-2534 

116-2534 
116-1733 

118-1068 
109-1608 
111-2492 
118-2253 
119-2521 

2-340 

2-643 

43-1453 
107-835 

13-7 
82-1209 

16-139 
21-633 

25-502 

12-625 

119-962 

121-2329 




Marbur? Tr 


171 


Marconi 


1904^31 


171 


Marconi v. Shoemaker v. Fess^iden 


159 


Margot V. Schnetzer 


1883-318 
1894-104 

1904-72 
1895-152 

1903-23 




Marie, Princess of Ysenburg 


40 


Market St. Cable Co. v. Rowlev 




Mark Cross Co 




Mark Cross Co 




Mark Cross Co 






Mark Cross Co 






Marks v. Greenaualt 




123, 124 


Marks 


1904-115 
1904-361 


64,68 


Marks 


68 


Marks 


142 


Marr 




171 


Marsh 


1870-151 

1871-47 

1871-144 

1872-246 
1876-198 

1888-58 

1878-161 

1879-121 

1882-1 

1889-185 

1883-79 
1877-106 




Marsh v. Dodge 


124, 127 


Marsh v. Rein v. Ruppel 


142, 145 

146 
159 


Marsh v. Warren ! 




Marshall v. Fish 


123 


Marston 


94 


Martin 


41 


Martin v. Bogle, Rtinyan & Patric 


37,93,110 


Martin v. Martin & Browne Co 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



101 



TITLE 



Martin v. Olney. . . 
Martz 

Marvel v. Decker. . 
Marvin v. Lillie. . . 
Mason 

Mason 

Mason and Imlay. 
Mason v. Hepbtim 



Mason v. Loellbor and Houghton. 



CD. 



1876-124 
1870-16 
1870-49 
1870-91 

1899-271 



1884-178 
1891-76 

1870-20 

1869-4 

1870-35 

1888-33 



1872-183 
1898-510 



1869-26 

1870-11 
1870-26 



O. G. 



Rule 



9-1107 



86-348 
114-2384 

27-299 



43-627 

84-1728 
110-1727 

2-274 

84-147 

86-789 

86t^00 

87-516 

87-517 

87-2121 

88-192 

88-1160 

88-1706 

94-986 

94-1188 

99-449 

100-2175 

100-2386 

105-198 

105-975 

105-977 

106-1507 

106-1241 

107-266 

107-540 

107-1660 

110-1432 

111-1364 

111-1365 

112-728 

112-955 

114-766 

115-252 

115-806 

115-1330 

118-589 

118-1934 

121-1351 



5 
37 



144 



33,46 



127 



102 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Masseth v. Johnston 


1894-233 

1887-20 
1890-72 

1904-567 
1900-285 

1904-88 

1873-110 
1872-92 
1872-126 
1898-34 

1902-484 
1904-296 


67-143 
102-1297 

38-1489 

113-2505 
91-1239 
91-2008 

109-1069 
111-2494 

4-1 
1-405 

82-1691 
88-2242 
90-448 

101-3108 
113-549 

111-1363 
117-2631 
98-1968 
99-1623 
101-1831 
107-1378 
115-509 

85-150 
86-1984 
100-232 

4-210 
5-339 




Massicks & Crooke 


36,93,94 


Massie 


37.64 


Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Mfg. Co 

Masters & Co 




Masury 


154 


Mathews 




Mathews 




Matthes 


48 


Matthes v. Burt 


110 


Matthews 


171 


Maxwell v. Brvon v. Henrv 


1902-67 

1898-211 

1873-134 
1889-139 

1874r-17 
1875-88 
187S-145 

1870-54 
1879-186 

1870-14 
1878-60 




Mav V. Merker 




Mayall 


37 


Mayall v. Murphy & Schenck 


94 


Mavnard 


66 


Mayo 






Mayor. 


51-156 

13-912 
121-2666 
113-1417 
48-397 
92-2507 
93-1123 
97-1374 

117-1795 
121-1347 


172 


Marconi v. Shoemaker v. Fessenden 


118 


Meacham 


1904-511 
1889-173 
1900-154 


68,78 


Mead and Brown 


15, 22 


Mechlin v. Horn, Colclazer and Munger 

Meden v. Curtis 


122, 124 
126 

96, 122, 






124 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



103 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Mejfford 


1883-96 


26-881 
80-1760 

116-1184 

122-2062 

46-971 

80-813 

91-230 

86-776 
91-2003 
66-2062 
80-362b 

81-1417 

86-2172 

88-1705 

88-1706 

94-1186 

103-1684 

111-1936 

112-730 

83-1613 
95-2483 

116-1186 

10-863 

11-196 

11-970 

102-468 

78-1903 
92-2003 

83-1996 

92-2004 

105-2060 

86-290 
92-2001 
100-2774 
100-2775 
114-1550 
115-1066 

101-1612 
61-299 


41 


Meigs, Hughes and Stout v. Gerdom 

Memro v. Walker 


16, 132 
126 


Menendez v. Holt 


1889-344 

1898-229 
1893-686 
1897-724 

1898-610 




Mergenthaler 




Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Press Pub- 
lishing Co. 
Mergenthaler v. Scudder 




Meriwether & Co 




Merrill 


68, 142 


Merrill and Carlton v. Atwood 


1869-6 

1869-58 

1869-78 

1870-12 

1870-34 

1870-50 

1876-62 

1876-243 

1877-11 

1877-279 

1881-14 

1890-19 

1895-157 

1897-1 
1898-506 




Merrill and Merrill v. Glidden 


142 


Merrill and Merrill v. Glidden 


110,142 


Merrill v. Yeomans and Goss 




Messinger 


142, 171 


Messincrer v. The Com. of Patents 


26 


Metropolitan West Side Elevated Ry. Co. 
V. Seemens 

Metzger 


/ 
1898-220 
1901-99 

1902-407 
1890-66 


41,42 


Meucci. 


24, 93, 1 




193 



104 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Mevey. 



Mewes 

Meyer v. Sarfert. 

Meyer V. Sarfert. 

Meyers v. Tyden. 
Meyrose v. John. 



Michael v. Kenney, Sr 

Michaelis 

Michigan Central Ry. Co. v. Consolidated 
Car Heating Co. 



Miehler v. Read. 
Miehler v. Read. 



1891-116 



1872-163 
1889-103 

1901-91 

1903-529 

1904^2 
1891-145 



1870-140 



1895-357 



1899-191 
1901-396 



Miel V. Young. 
Miles V.Todd.. 



MiU... 
Miller. 



Miller. 

MiUer. 

Mmer. 

Miller. 

Miller. 
Miller. 



1904-420 



1887-92 
1872-94 
1872-215 
1873-67 

1901-45 



1901-122 
1901-223 
1903-147 
1903-282 



56-805 
93-2321 
113-549 
116-298 

2-617 



96-1037 
102-621 

102-1555 
115-506 

108-287 
56-1447 
84-1283 

104-1896 



121-1349 

71-1028 

114-1028 

117-2086 

89-354 

96-426 

102-1297 

103-659 

114-1553 

121-1350 
122-2688 
124-317 

112-1479 
112-1480 
112-1477 

40-918 
1-431 



95-1452 
100-682 
110-602 

96-1856 
100-682 

97-2307 
100-682 

104^309 
108-1051 

105-2057 
116-2532 



135 



134 



114, 116 
122. 124 



109 
114, 122 



159 
31 



113 



124 



110 



92 . 134 



66 

171 
66, 122 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



105 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



MiUer 

Miller & Co. v. The Bridgeport Brass Co. 



Miller v. Eagle Mfg. Co. 



Miller V. KeUey. 



Miller v. Kelley. 



Miller v. Lipe. 



Miller v. Mann v. Bacon v. Torrance. 

Miller v. Mann 

Miller v. Miles 

Miller v. Perham 



Miller v. Smith . 



Millett V. Reed v. Duell, Com. of Patents. . 



Milligan v. Lalance & Grosjean Mfg. Co. 



Milligan v. Niedringhaus. 
Mills 



Mills 

Mills 

Mills V. Torrance. 
Mills V. Torrance. 
Mills V. Torrance. 
Millspaugh 



1882-49 
1887-84 



1894-147 

1895-^M) 

1895-317 



1898-150 



1901-406 



1903-266 



1877-15 



1880-643 

1901-410 

1884-410 
1891-165 

1887-1 

1875-74 

1875-100 

1876-36 

1877-62 

1892-11 



1902-17 

1903-306 

1904-172 

1870-112 

1870-134 

1878-113 



119-1259 
21-201 
86-490 
92-384 
96-2577 
97-2979 

66-845 

80-661 

80-970 

80-967 

84-1281 

87-1607 

87-1962 

90-447 

92-1038 

84-1144 

86-183 

87-1784 

96-1038 
103-223 
110-1726 
118-1935 

105-1532 
105-1533 
115-1063 
122-730 
11-197 
121-2667 
123-998 
123-1663 

18-1047 
84-649 

96-1241 
97-2979 

29-367 



38-103 
7-961 



62-317 
117-904 

98-416 
106-544 
110-857 



50,67 



154. 163 

124 
122 
126 

96, 122, 
124. 125 



159 
171 



66 

94, 126 
113 
)9, 108, 126 
126 



106 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



RUEL 



Milton V. Kingsley. 
Milton V. Kingsley. 



Milton V. Kingsley. 



Minich 

Mitchell v.Fitts. 

Moehn 

MoUer 



Monce v. Adams. 



Mond V. Duell, Com. of Patents. 
Moodie 



Moody and Hudson. 
Moore 



Moore 

Moore v. Brown 

Moore v. Curtis 

Moore v. Curtis 

Moore v. Heweth v. Potter. 
Morford v. Carpenter 



1896-3 
1896-420 
1896-420 
1896-426 



1896-426 
1896-420 
1903-486 
1903-140 
1903-322 
1904-70 

1872-3 

1872-35 

1872-90 

1872-91 

1872-115 

1872-207 

1900-298 
1884-36 



1869-108 

1870-51 

1871-249 

1871-256 

1872-154 

1893-63 
1882-20 



Morgan 

Morgan Enveloi)e Co. v. Albany Perforated 

Wrapping Paper Co. 
Morgan v. Daniels 



1892-156 

1902-461 

1894-238 

1896-60 

1894-285 

1895-315 

1896-3 



71-887 
115-508 

76-2193 
103-227 
103-427 
103-1684 
110-1726 
112-1214 
118-1935 
122-2391 

76-2196 
103-1684 

107-1971 

103-1916 

106-996 

108-2144 

113-1972 

1-1 



91-1437 

118-2254 

28-1271 

82-1211 

110-1112 



63-463 

22-1882 

120-324 

121-2326 

116-609 

60-437 

110-2234 

101-2668 

67-271 

80-658 

67-811 

79-157 

79-1030 

79-1368d 

97-1840 

123-1288 



68 

109 

6. 39, 46 

26 



24 



24,66 



184 
113 
122 

122, 123 
109 



133 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



107 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Moriarty 

Morley 

Morley , 

Morley Sewing Machine Co. v. Lancaster 



Morris and Watson 
Morrison 

Morrison 

Morrison 



Morse. 

Morse. 
Morse. 



Morse 

Morse v. Clark. 



Morton. 



Morton v. Cooley. 
Mosely 



Mosler Safe Lock Co. v. Mosler, Bahmann 
& Co. 



Moss V. Blaisdell. 
Moss V. Blaisdell. 

Mothes 

Motsinger 

Motthes V. Burt.. 



1902-201 

1886-32 
1902-144 

1889-380 
1890-59 
1895-29 
1895-31 



1870-71 
1874-118 

1870-60 
1871-327 
1879-169 
1902-226 



1872-106 
1872-122 

1873-81 
1874-82 
1874-112 
1874-94 

1901-260 
1872-58 

1871-169 

95-2063 
1870-63 
1880-69 
1888-420 
1890-102 
1890-165 
1890-166 
1894-156 
1893-126 

1904^619 
1904-668 
1904-600 
1904-160 



99-2549 
99-2550 
37-337 
99-668 
102-466 

47-267 

80-362 

81-968 

87-1962 

88-2410 

94-2362 

96-2584 



16-359 
99-2969 
101-1612 
101-2075 
107-1661 
113-2504 

1-489 

3-467 
6-763 



97-2982 

1-276 

30-1092 



43-1116 
97-1174 



113-1703 

113-2506 

113-1146 

110-601 

114-764 

118-1934 



41.;42 

20 

16,66,66, 
133 



37 

77 



41,66,68 



36,60 
139 

133, 139 

145 

113 



66 



126 

154, 169 
70 
60 



108 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Motile and Bannehr 

Mower v. Crisp & Copeland , 

^ Mower v. DueU, Com. of Patents 



Mueller and Bratmsdorf . 

Muhl 

Mullen & Mullen 



Muller V. Lauber 

Mulligan v. Tempest Salve Co. 

Mimiler 

Munger 



Munn& Co 

Munro v. Alexander. 



Munro v. Walkfer. 
Munson 



Murdock.. 
Murdock. . 
Murmann. 



Murphy. 



Murphy 

Murphy & Atkinson. 
Murphy v. Meissner. 



Murray. 



Murray 

Murray and Wuterich . 



1871-87 
1898-41 



1899-395 



1880-117 

1890-9 

1893-87 

1893-99 

1891-3 

1891-76 

1903-387 



1883-62 

1869-3 

1880-69 

1893-48 

1903-334 



1903-219 

1874-103 
1879-260 
1900-183 

1869-24 
1870-49 



1891-149 



1891-130 

1904-368 

1873-96 

1874-52 

1878-3 

1879-241 

1879-291 

1890-30 



83-156 
87-517 
94-986 

88-191 
94-986 
94-1188 
106-1241 
107-266 
111-1365 
114-766 
118-1934 
122-733 

118-270 
17-744 
60-837 
86-1986 



106-2016 

119-1924 

24-1090 



63-163 

106-1000 

111-2224 

122-2062 

106-264 

110-1431 

6-606 

16-967 

93-1721 

97-187 



116-1848 

66-1449 

114-1830 

114-1831 

66-1060 
97-1372 

111-2491 

3-669 

3-550 

30-1321 

41-467 

88-546 



37 



37 
133 



116 

114. 146 
74 
76 

76 
116 

213 

77 

66 

181 

41,42.68 



171 
133 



171 

66. 68.R 
41 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



109 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


RUEL 


Mushet. .,,,, t ,..-,..,, t ..... r .,. T ,,. T - 


1870-106 
1870-126 
1870-147 
1893-280 










Musser 


1879-252 
1889-198 


16-858 
49-131 


171 


Myers 


78, 165 




1891-6 
1891-125 






Myers 


1893-103 


64-859 
119-962 
122-351 
123-1663 
112-2093 
119-962 


65,66433 


Myers 


139 


Myers 




69, 139 , 


Myers 




172 


Mvers v. Brown 


1904-445 


96,|133, 
124 




Mveatt 


1904-364 


111-2493 
115-1066 
118-1685 
121-1676 


134 


Mviaratt. . . : 


15 


*'*/6***"' 

Myijatt 




133 


Mveatt 




65,66,81 






133,134, 
145 


Naef 


1902-325 
1904-230 


100-2601 

110-2016 

115-1583 

115-2135 

17-198 

60-159 

81-799 

104-1896 

58-1093 

83-744 


77 


Naef 


171 


Naef 


171, 172 


Naef 




68, 171,R 


Nagel 


1880-17 

1892-146 

1897-204 

1903-181 

1892-280 


94, 133 • 


Nash 


165 


Nash 


203 


Nash 


41 


Nathan Mfe. Co. v. Craie 








National Car Brake Shoe Co. v. Lake 


1880-664 


18-1179 


37 


Shore R. R. 








National Cash Register Co. v. American 


1893-160 


62-449 




Cash Register Co. 




99-666 




National Cash Register Co. v. Lamson Con- 


1894-283 


67-680 




solidated Store Service Co. 




88-1161 




National Hat Pouncing Machine Co. v. 


1893-294 


63-466 




Hedden 




118-268 




National Machine Co. v. Wheeler & Wilson 


1896-259 


74-1588 




Mfg. Co. 




85-151 




National Meter Co. v. Thomson Meter Co. 


1895-192 


70-925 
92-1797 




National Phonograph Co 


1899-221 


89-1669 


126 


National Phonograph Co. v. Allen 


1902-571 


101-1133 


12 



110 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Nave & McCord Mercantile Co 


1899-60 

1871-156 
1871-156 
1872-34 
1875-113 

1879-11 
1880-73 

1897-174 
1898-332 

1890-37 

1891-245 

1892-63 

1892-112 

1893-^7 


86-1985 
91-1617 
96-1855 




Neal and Adams 


118 


Neal and Adams v. Daniels 




88 


Neale 


15-511 

81-1787 

84-1584 

101-1834 

82-749 
92-1038 
106-1000 
115-^04 

50-1132 

122-1397 

16-220 
116-874 
120-323 
123-998 
107-541 
22-587 

54-135 

89-1344 

104-1395 

68-1276 
78-1255 

53-277 
88-2068 

32-1356 
80-813 

121-688 
4-319 
4-314 

111-300 
110-307 
112-1216 


12,15 


Nealon 


65, 144, 


Neill V. Com. of Patents 


176 


Neiswanger , 




Nenninger 


133 


Neracher v. Cain 


1879-128 


121 


Neth and Tamplin v. Ohmer 


113 


Neth and Tamplin v. Ohmer 




114, 124 


Neth and Tamplin v. Ohmer 




110, 113 


Nettles 


1903-428 
1882-371 
1889-117 
1890-21 

1891-253 
1896-27 

1894-465 

1890-485 

1885-419 


68 


New V. Warren 




New York Belting & Packing Co. v. The 
New Jersey Car Spring & Rubber Co. 

New York Filter Co. v. Jewell Filter Co. 

New York Grape Sugar Co. v. The Amer- 
ican Grape Sugar Co. 

New York Grape Sugar Co. v. Buffalo 
Grape Sugar Co.; New York Sugar Co. 
V. American Grape Sugar Co. 

New York Woven Wire Mattress Co 


15 


Neuboeker and Schafhaus 


1873-138 
1874-54 

1904-249 
1904-146 


101, 126 


Newberry v. O'Donohue 


128 
171 


Newcomb v. Lemp 


65 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



111 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Newcomb v. Lemp 


1904-314 
1904-412 


109-2171 

116-20li2 

112-1216 

122-3013 

119-1683 

122-730 

108-1053 

116-1847 

39-1419 

94-1787 

99-1870b 

76^673 

79-2200 

84-2020 

111-1038 

93-2319 

95-233 

95-1454 

123-1288 

4-106 

80-1891 

99-1623 

110-604 

62-310 

110-2494 

96-1035 

16-631 

109-2441 

67-1426 

66-1666 

97-2306 

98-1707 

105-1780 

101-1610 

109-1067 

109-1067 

111-1624 

111-2222 

113-2215 

121-337 
91-644 
91-648 
94-1970 
96-2064 
106-2292 
123-1285 


136, 147 


Newcomb v LeniD 


163 
122 


Newcomb v. Thomson 


122 


Newell V. Clifford v. Rose 




126 


Newell V. Clifford v. Rose 




101 


Newell V. Hubbard 


1904-61 


109 


Newell V. Hubbard 


124 


New Process Fermentation Co. v. Maus 

Newton v. Buck 


1887-402 
1891-203 

1896-343 
1898-206 
1900-406 

1870-71 
1872-41 

1873-118 

1897-70 

1902-177 

1890-112 

1901-86 

1879-218 

1904-135 

1891-216 

1891-166 

1901-220 

1902-66 

1902-403 




Newton v. Woodward 




Newton v. Woodward 


17, 146 


Nichols 




Nichols 


41 


Nichols 


26 


Nichols & Shepard Co 




Nicholson 


174, 176 


Nicholson 


46 


Nicholson v. Bennett 


93,94 


Nickel and Crane 


24,79 


Nickola 


1,39 


Nicolin and Ochsenreiter 


70, 133 


Niedermeyer v. Walton 


122 


Niedermeyer v. Walton 




Niedringhaus v. Marquard v. McConnell 

Niedringhaus v. Marquad v. McConnell 


122 
126 


Nielson v. Bradshaw 


1900-265 









112 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD 



O. G. 



Rule 



Nielson v. Bradshaw 

Nimmy v. Com. of Patents. 
Noakes 



Noble V. Sessions 

Norden v. Spaulding 

Nordstrom 

Normand v. Krimmelbein. 
Northall v. Bemardin 



Northall v. Bemardin . 



Northall v. Painter v. Bemardin . 



Northrup v. Adams . 



Norton... 
Novotny. 
Noyes.. . . 



0*Connell v. Schmidt. 
O'Connor 



Ocumpaugh v. Norton. 
Ocumpaugh v. Norton. 
Odell V. Stout 



Odemheimer. 



Ohmer v. Neth and Tamplin 

Oldham and Padbviry v. Peck v. Clements v. 
Richards 

O'Leary 

Olau 

Olin V. Timken 



1900-274 
1899-266 

1892-243 
1892-114 
1892-123 



1896-15 
1896-183 

1896-10 



1877-322 
1893-327 

1882-14 
1904-67 
1876-106 
1875-153 



1899-211 
1904r-207 



1884-461 

1896-46 

1898-163 

1889-240 
1894-105 



1902-148 

1900-82 
1897-24 
1894-646 



91-648 
101-1133 
86-346 
88- 

60-676 



121-1348 
114-1827 
116-1327 
116-249 
76-1863 
79-1191 

74-666 
78-1740 
79-1191 
86-996 

71-1169 
78-1740 
79-1191 

12-430 
120-1168 
121-1678 

22-1206 

108-1327 

8-818 

122-2066 
89-1141 
97-2308 

110-1723 
123-1285 

114-646 
115-1064 

29-862 



49-1693 

118-1686 
99-670 

91-2001 
79-861 
69-1361 
86-490 



S, 113 



124 
116 

76, 146 
97, 122 



81 

68, 171 
41 

148 



96,97.98 



113 

122, 124 
133, 146 
199 
41,42,60,64 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



113 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



RULB 



Oliver 

Oliver v. Everett 

Oliver v.Felbel.. 



1896-29 

1889-214 

1890-65 

1902-666 

1902-309 
1902-315 



Oliver v. Zeller 

Olsen 

Opdyke 

Opinion of the Attorney General 

Opinion of the Attorney General 

Opinion of the Attorney General 

Opinion of the Attorney General 

Opinion Touching the Right of Employes 
of the Patent Office to File an Applica- 
tion for a Patent 

Orcutt & Son 

Organ 

O'Rourke v. Central City Soap Co 

O'Rourke v. Gillespie 



1876-187 
1902-432 

1890-39 

1892-30 
1895-31 
1895-92 

1878-164 
1880-154 

1889-263 



1894-111 
1896-96 

1884-12 

1876-102 

1902-231 
1886-217 

1898-136 



76-961 
49-731 
94-221 

100-2384 

101-267 

101-2572 

102-1470 

103-890 

104-1124 

105-977 

106-1000 

106-1241 

106-2018 

110-2014 

111-1366 

114-766 

117-1799 

121-337 

121-1351 

10-416 
101-2079 
113-852 

60-1293 

80-1272 
91-1034 



16-233 
23-341 

47-398 

103-660 
104-1121 

69-639 

70-493 

122-352 

26-637 
80-1123 

8-277 
10-333 

100-231 

36-876 

96-426 
99-2101 

84-P84 

84-1585 
84-1586 



22 
114, 116 

122, 146 



113 
209 

66,66,67 



170 
29 



176 

176 



146 



114 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Orr 



Osbom. 



Osbom V. Austin 

Osborne v. Armstrong. . 
Osborne v. Hotsapillar. 



Osbom V. Mitchell. , . 

Osborne 

Osborne 

Osborne & Dayton. . . 



Osborne v. Hotsapillar. 



Osgood V. Badger v. Bennett. . . 
O'Shaughnessy v. Van Depoele. 
Ostergren v. Tripler 



1869-33 

1869-70 

1870-26 

1871-147 

1876-17 

1876-22 

1898-16 



Oval Wood Dish Co. et al v. Sandy Creek 

Wood Mfg. Co. 
Overland Telephone Co. v. American Bell 

Telephone Co. 

Overstrom 

Oviatt and Dean 

Owens V. Richardson 

Oxnard and Baur 

Pacholder 



1901-16 



1904-264 
1900-137 
1902-100 
1870-149 
1871-195 
1875-15 

1903-47 



1888-126 
1891-172 

1893-19 
1896-73 

1901-360 



1894-216 



1888-322 



1903-263 
1903-419 
1904-289 



1899-170 

1890-66 

1895-29 
1895-n31 
1895-92 



82-894 
95-1451 

116-1066 

114-2091 

94-683 

109-1336 

102-1297 
111-300 
92-1797 
98-2366 



119, 142 
116 
114, 116 



113 
36,133,146 
68 



102-1296 
106-2018 
108-797 

44-1066 
81-1932 

62-1063 
91-1436 

96-837 
100-1114 
114-2383 

66-1896 

43-377 

79-1368b 

80-517 

80-518 

106-1631 

107-269 

111-1037 

111-1038 

118-837 

118-1067 

88-1626 

61-296 

81-967 
81-968 



30,77,122 
126 

169 . 



77,146,176 



37 



66 

171 

122 



41,42 
37 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



115 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Packard v. Sanford. 



Page 

Page and Krausse . 

Paget V. Bugg 



Paige. 

Paige. 
Paine. 



Painter 

Painter v. Hall . 

Painter v. Hall . 



Palm V. Behel. 



Palmer. 
Palmer. 

Palmer. 



Palmer and Thompson v. Bailey. 

Palmer v. Coming 

Palmer v. The Gatling Gun Co. . . 



Palmer v. Johnston. 

Parent 

Paris V. Bussey 



1879-314 
1880-177 
1880-212 
1889-153 

1901-166 

1888-63 

1888-199 

1899-214 



1887-71 
1890-57 

1904-59 
1878-61 
1890-5 

1891-200 
1897-43 

1898-91 



1876-220 
1879-28 

1880-129 

1882-6 

1888-10 

1892-6 

1893-21 

1893-24 

1898-66 

189&-222 

1881-366 

1888-391 

1902-76 

1876-146 

1876-62 

1876-176 



16-1182 
37-1001 



97-661 
43-1466 

89-1342 

92-2340 

100-3013 

105-1263 

40-807 

108-1687 
13-408 
80-1273 
89-706 

67-999 
106-765 
80-1124 
81-1612 
92-1619 
120-2445 

83-1803 

86-1499 

86-490 

86-491 

97-2744 

10-701 

17-976 
21-1111 
84-1281 
68-383 



83-1207 
84-2021 

70-1497 
87-1610 
20-816 
97-1176 
43-768 
98-1970 
8-869 



140, 142 



30 



126 



64 



64 



37 



88 
24,79 



66 
41 
93,94 



116 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Park V. Cain 


1898-73 
1898-111 

1871-293 

1886-16 

1891-116 

1897-73 

1898-644 

1883-421 

1890-10 

1896-371 
1896-5 

1904^661 
1904-142 


83-1346 

84-146 

92-2002 

84-146 

85-151 

85-152 




Park V. Davis 




Parker 


37 


Parker 


36-119 

80-1892 
86-287 
26-290 
123-324 

76-1201 
87-1401 
116-875 
116-594 

113-2213 

110-306 

120-323 

123-2313 

100-3012 

109-1336 

109-1336 

63-769 

81-2085 

97-1596 

97-2979 

103-660 


136 


Parker 


83 


Parker, Holmes & Co 




Parker &. Whipple Co. v. The Yale Clock 
Co. 




Parkes 


69, 171 
113 


■Parkes v. Lewis 


Parkes v. Lewis 


113,122, 
118, 124 
110, 148 


Parkes v. Lewis 




Parkhurst 


1902-343 
1904r-98 

1893-64 

1871-261 

1872-155 

1873-45 

1878-129 

1878-130 

1891-180 
1894-93 


133 


Parlrin atiH Parkin v. "Riotte 


122,126, 
128 


Parkin and Wright v. Jenness 


Parkinson 


79 


Pamnlv v. HorhhaiisiaTi 


4-691 

42-293 

98-229 

102-1295 

67-646 

116-1327 
24-203 
79-2196 

42-96 

26-980 

80-1126 

83-747 

83-748 

83-1994 




Parrish 


75 


Parsons v. Colgate 




1883-319 

1888-1 
1888-3 
1890-51 

1883-101 




Pastor Perez De La Sala 


42 


Patitz 









PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



117 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Pattee. 



Pattee v. Russell. 
Pattee v. Russell < 



Patten v. Weisenfeld. 
Patten v. Weisenfeld. 
Patterson 



Paul V. Hess. 
Paul V. Hess. 



Paul V. Johnson. 



Paul V. Johnson -. 



Pauling 

Pajme 

Pearce v. Mulford. 



Pearl v. Sawyer 

Pearl v. The Ocean Mills. 



Pearson. 



Pearson v. Lister v. Reixach. 
Peats 



Peek. 



Peck 

Peck Brothers Co. 



Peerless Carbon Black Co . 



1872-266 
1876-198 
1880-177 

1872-265 
1880-177 

1873-29 
1876-135 

1902-114 
1902-197 
1904^91 



1904-478 



1903-380 



1904-^10 



1904r-42 
1880-667 

1874^58 

1877-133 

1880-207 

1887-36 



1883-119 
1901-117 



1901-65 



1901-136 
1903-311 



1897-791 



2-618 



2-618 

3-181 

98-2589 

99-2647 

109-1070 

113-2507 

114-2381 

113-847 
113-848 
116-261 
120-2444 

106-2013 

109-807 

123-2313 

109-807 
106-2014 

115-1848 

108-1049 

18-1223 

79-1034 

5-695 
11-2 
80-522 

40-244 

91-2372 

97-1175 

24-1175 

96-1649 

109-1069 

111-2494 

96-425 
97-750 
99-2101 

96-2409 
106-764 
108-288 
108-289 
111-2228 

81-803 
121-691 



142 



114, 122 

114 

16 



110 



46, 116 
65,66 



122 



143 



60 



118 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Pegel 

Pell V. Pierpoint. 



Peloubet. 
Pelton.... 



Pennsylvania Diamond Drill Co. and 
Simpson 

Pennsylvania Ry. Co. v. The Locomotive 
Engine Safety Trunk Co. 

Pentlarge v. New York Bung & Bushing Co 

Perez De La Sala 

Perkins 

Perkins 

Perkins 



Perrault v. Pierce 

Pemissel v. Wichmann. 



Perry and Lay. 



Perry v. Starrett. 

Person 

Peters v. Hisey . . 



Petithomme v. Bedbury. 
Petrie V. De Schweinitz. . 



Petrie v. De Schweinitz. 



1891-93 
1896-38 

1891-121 
1901-37 

1886-431 

1891-24 

1891-161 

1884-168 



1884-304 
1891-76 

1888-1 
1890-51 

1891-63 
1899-141 

1899-142 
1899-548 

1904-73 
1902-228 



1869-3 
1875-109 
1875-128 
1877-108 

1878-368 
1880-^647 



1893-4 

1890-189 
1892-243 

1902-127 
1902-534 



1902-634 
1902-127 



66-1628 
76-1673 
83-1806a| 
66-928 
96-633 
109-1609 
37-219 



27-207 

88-2411 

97-1840 

28-370 



42-96 

66-139 

88-648 
88-945 

88-945 
91-2003 

108-2146 
99-2970 
111-1624 
111-1628 
115-510 
121-2326 



14-699 

119-1683 
62-316 
97-2979 

62-606 



99-446 
103-1862 
112-1479 
118-836 

99-1387 



81,82 



68 
41 



42 

41,42,48, 
70, 146 
66 



125, 126 
109, 122 



37 



61 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



119 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Petry. 



Petzold. 



Petzold. 



Petzold 

Petzold 

Petzold 

Pfatischer v. Buck. 

Pfaulder \ . 

Pfaulderi 



Pfaulder. 



Pfeffer 

Pfingst V. Anderson. 
Pfingst V. Anderson. 

Pfingst V. Anderson. 
Pfingst V. Anderson. 



1870-106 
1670-110 
1871-324 

1891-95 
1893-103 

1891-97 
1896-28 

1891-207 

1892-39 

1892-235 

1902-390 

1882-17 

1883-1 

1883-109 

1883-109 
1883-1 

1894-4 



Phelps V. Warmley v. McCullough. 



Philadelphia Watch Case Co. v. The Dueber 
Watch Case Mfg. Co. v. The Keystone 
Watch Case Co. v. Byron L. Strasburger 
&Co. 

Phillips 



Phillips 

Phillips Chemical Co. 



1871-273 
1880-69 

1903-271 



Phillips V. The City of Detroit. 



1880-251 



Phillips V. Sinsenich 

Pickering v. McCullough, Dalzell & Co. 



Pickering v. McCullough, Dalzell & Co. . . . 
Pickhardt v. Packard 



1878-247 

1882-28 
1893-46 

1886-122 



65-1661 

66-1662 

67-1277 
68-1091 
61-1789 
101-1370 
22-1881 
23-269 
23-629 

23-629 
23-269 

66-846 
114-264 
117-697 
121-2326 

118-1067 

120-264 

120-325 

118-1069 
119-2234 

122-1726 



106-1779 

119-662 

120-326 

17-191 
87-1610 
122-1047 
13-818 
21-1876 

21-73 
79-1521 

30-179 
79-685 



41,42,133 

80 

79 

34 

83 

4,164 

88 

16, 87,R 



68 

109, 122 
122 

122, 124 



76 



76 



6, 60, 61 



106 



120 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Pickles. 
Pickles. 



1904-76 
1904-126 



Pieper. . . 
Pierce. . . 
Pierce. . . 
Pietzner. 



Pihl V. Mersman. 

Pinder 

Pintsch 



1901-224 
1903-142 

1903-367 



Pitney 

Pitney v. Smith and Egge. 



Pittsburgh Pump Co. 



Pittsburgh Reduction Co. v. The Cowles 
Electric Smelting & Aluminium Co. 

Pittsburgh Reduction Co. v. The Cowles 
Electric Smelting Aluminium Co. 

Piatt V. Shipley 



Platts and Walden. 



Plimpton 

Plimpton V. Winslow. 



Plumley 

Podlesak and Podlesak v. Mclnnemey. 
Podlesak and Podlesak v. Mclnnemey. 



Podlesak and Podlesak v. Mclnnemey . 
Pohl V. Anchor Brewing Co 



1877-43 

1880-76 
1889-193 
1890-27 
1890-86 

1898-618 



1894-673 
1894-637 
1894-637 
1894-573 

1898-307 



1879-443 
1881-22 

1902-460 
1882-430 
1895-64 

1902-363 



1889-669 
1890-275 



109-276 
109-1888 
110-2236 
113-1967 

116-1063 
97-2307 
121-1347 
103-2171 
106-545 

106-1777 

123-2976 

11-697 

17-447 
49-129 



84-309 

87-1783 

97-750 

69-789 
92-1038 

69-1209 



82-461 
106-1776 
114-2384 

16-827 



101-2667 
22-1207 

101-447 

118-836 

120-2127 

121-1350 

122-1722 

122-2688 

122-2689 

123-1989 

123-2313 

123-2973 

124-319 

123-1989 
49-1696 
94-2361 



41,42 
41,42 



167 

78, 126 
68. 141 
77 

116 
199,86,R 
41, 133, 
134 
20 

18, 133, 
147 148 



70 



41 
122 
37,97,124 



37.96 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



121 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Pohl V. The Anchor Brewinc^ COr. ........ 


1890-276 
1889-669 


61-166 
87-1785 

119-2619 

122-729 

124r-319 

69-939 

61-1666 

26-290 

104-2147 
69-471 

116-1184 

73-1651 
79-157 
86-^800 
88-1159 
102-1297 
109-2171 

112-1214 
63-760 
116-1461 
120-1823 
122-1721 
123-2309 

122-1721 
124-319 

96-1049 
97-1836 
96-2484 
97-2532 
101-2822 
105-1263 

90-2134 

70-494 

78-2050 

80-186 

87-894 

87-895 

87-1077 

87-1078 

87-2122 

90-2134 

91-1241 

94-2359 

80-186 

78-2049 
90-2134 

67-1128 




Pohl V. McICnifirht 


116 


Pollock 


1892-103 

1892-233 

1883-74 

1903-186 

1892-360 

1896-707 
1896-11 

1904-409 
1890-163 


16 


Poole 


83 


Pope. 


81 


PoT)e and Mimo v. McLean 


113 


Pope Mfg. Co. V. Gonnully & Jeffery Mfg. 

Co. 
Porter v. Loreden 




Post 


96, 133 


Potter 


68 


Potter V. Mcintosh 


123, 124 


Potter V. Mcintosh 




124 . 


Potter V. Mcintosh 




124 


Potter V. Ochs 


1901-39 

1901-206 

1901-63 

1900-237 
1896-143 
1896-21 
1897-521 

. 1897-621 
1895-143 

. 1891-206 
1892-242 


164 


Potter V. Ochs 


168 


Potter V. Van Vleck v. Thomson 

Potts V. Creaeer 


68 

122 

123 

66 


Potts V. Creager 




Potts V. Creager 




Poulter 


167 







122 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Poulter. 



Powell 

Powell 

Power V. Proeger., 
Powers 



Powers and Stevens . 



Powrie 

Practice in Interference Cases. 



Pratt 

Pratt V. Rosenfeld. 
Pressprich 



Price 

Proeger. , 
Priest. . . 



Prindle v. Brown. 



Prosser. . 
Proudfit. 



Pryor v. Ball v. Brand. 
Pugh 



Pugh V. Hamilton. 



Pugh V. Hamilton and Hanson. 



Pulvermacher 

Pupin V. Hutin and Leblanc v. Stone. 



1892-241 
1891-205 

1878-72 
1902-163 
1902-482 
1904-63 

1869-46 
1871-189 

1902-200 
1877-121 

1887-31 
1891-131 

1882-146 

1877-18 



1891-201 
1891-182 
1903-91 



1904-680 
1904-282 

1901-164 
1876-202 
1877-19 



1901-78 

1871-116 
1870-153 
1871-232 

1870-153 
1871-68 
1871-116 
1879-266 

1876-164 
1898-24 



68-619 

13-911 

99-1384 

101-3108 

108^1063 

108-1054 



99-2649 
12-979 
29-177 
39-1649 

21-866 
36-343 

11-196 
36-343 
42-293 

67-1000 

67-646 

103-428 

113-852 

114-2091 

112-967 

67-646 

121-2664 

97-968 
10-686 
36-343 
42-293 
100-234 

119-663 
96-841 
99-670 



40-346 



40-345 
40-346 

10-2 
82-1418 
92-2339 
93-940 



167 

89 

41,42 
94 
86 



106 
93 



133 



171 

79 

209 



41,42 
133 



124 
49,64,66. 
68 

122 



93 



29.89 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



123 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Pupin V. Hutin and LeUanc v. Stone. 



Putnam v. Yemngton . 



1902-269 

1902-550 

1876-339 

1876-106 

1876-186 

1877-99 

1878-74 

1880-129 



P3mi V. Hadaway . . 

Quick v.McGil 

Quimby v. Randall. 
Quist V. Ostrum — 



Rader&Co.... 
Raeymaeckus. 



Railway Register Mfg. Co. v. North Hudson 

Ry. Co. 
Randall and Luck 



^anks. . . 
Ransom. 



Ransome, Ransome and Sims. 



Rappleye 

Raulet and Nicholson v. Adams. 



1903-471 
1878-111 
1903-348 

1878-67 

1892-194 

1886-368 

1901-47 



1887-7 

1887-22 

1889-235 

1890-10 

1890-38 

1870-143 
1898-289 



Raymond. 



Raymond 

Raybum v. Strain. 
Read 



Read v. Scott. , 



1902-170 

1904-113 
1904-167 



1902-242 



100-931 
100-1113 

9-689 



123-1283 

107-1376 

14-748 

106-1501 

13-696 

86-1986 

60-1749 

97-1372 

33-366 

96-2063 
96-2061 
103-889 

3&-329 
39-119 



91-2211 
86-2096 
88-1161 
114-1827 
114-2091 
114-2092 
115-1328 
118-2249 
119-1259 
121-340 
121-689 
122-1398 

99-1386 
107-541 

109-1608 
110-603 
119-337 
100-449 



122 

104 

101 

6,96,110 

116 



171 



41,64 



8,19 
41,66 



28 



6,97,101 
116, 164 



68, 171 

171 

122 

66, 171 

91, 94, 

107,124, 

126,126, 

130 



124 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



T.TLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Reckendorfer v. Faber. 



Reddnghausen and Potter 

Reece Button Hole Machine Co. v. 

Button Hole Machine Co . 
Reece v. Fenwick 



Globe 



Reece v. Fenwick . 
Reece v. Fenwick . 



Reed Mfg. Go 

Reed v. Landman. 



Reed v. Roberts.. 



Reeve and Noyes.. 
Regan 



Regina Music Box Co . . 
Reichenback v. Kelley. 



Reid. 



Reid 

Reim 

Reis 

Remington 

Renier v. MacPhail. 



1876-430 

1876-182 

1876-187 

1878-9 

1881-15 

1904-499 
1894-360 
1897-689 

1901-73 



1901-143 



1902-146 



1900-140 

1891-73 

1893-106 

1894-2 

1894-^ 

1894-13 

1869-88 
1870-122 



1888-161 
1890-124 
1891-64 
1891-165 

1902-286 



1901-282 



1879-70 
1880-150 

1901-123 
1903-146 



1899-196 
1899-194 



10-71 
80-^47 
80-.362 
87-1610 

113-1146 
67-1720 
98-228 

96-643 
103-1679 
107-1661 

97-188 

99-669 
101-1831 
115-249 
117-276 

92-2001 
112-1480 

6^1275 

83-743 

83-746 

83-1660 

87-1608 



122-2064 
45-589 
97-551 

100-1112 
100-2775 

94r-1185 

94-1970 
95-234 
95-1648 
115-252 

15-882 

96-2060 

103-2173 

116-2007 

114-761 

89-521 

92-190 



68,142 



93, 109, 
124 
109, 130 



15 



173, 176 



65 



37 

41,42 
18,185 
171, 172 
84 
131 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



125 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Rennyson v. Merritt. 



Reppto V. Stephens.. 

Requa 

Re3molds 

Remolds 

Re3niolds 

Re3niolds v. Bean. . . 



Reynolds v. Habennan.. 



Rheutan 

Rhodes 

Rice 

Rice V. Burt 

Richard 

Richards 

Richards 

Richards v. Chase Elevator Co . 



Richards v. Chase Elevator Co . 
Richards v. Meissner 



Richards v. Tracy. 



Richardson.. 
Richardson.. 



Richardson.. 
Richardson.. 



Richardson v. Denza 

Richardson v. Humphrey.. 

Richardson v. Humphrey.. 



1892-64 
1893-20 



1903-272 

1892-148 

1874-119 

187fr-88 

1883-56 

1902-461 

1889-196 
1891-93 
1892-105 
1893-195 

1874-61 

1903-267 

1874^-44 

1879-291 

1904-644 

1901-46 



1895-392 
1895-728 

1896-728 
1895-392 



1898-217 



1871-303 
1872-144 

1904-436 



1871-134 
1877-113 
1879-28 

1870-166 
1899-179 
1899-51 

1899-61 
1899-179 



68-1416 
81-2246 
99-446 
108-290 

106-1779 

60-296 

6-641 

9-744 

24-993 

101-2821 

104-1895 

49-130 
97-1837 



6-621 

106-1261 

6-622 

16-1060 
113-1969 

96-1863 
124-627 

71-1466 

87-1610 
110-1427 

73-1710 
87-1610 
114-1831 
123-999 

86-288 
87-1784 
92-2508 
93-1123 

17-394 
2-3 

80-69 
112-1761 
120-2763 

23-2413 

30-1092 



88-2241 

86-1804 
88-2241 



146,147. 

164 

83 

133 

37 

130, 139 

124,' 

146, 164 

122 



37 
46 

37,42 
28 
199 
46,48 
68,76,171 



113, 148 



181 
76.1 

133 

171, 172 



113 



126 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Richardson v. Leidgen. 
Richardson v. Noyes. . . 



Richmond 

Richmond and Hibbard. 



Richter. 



Richter v. Rejmolds. 



Rider.. 



Ries 

Ries V. Thomson. 



Riker V. Law. 
Riley 



Riley 

Riley v. Barnard. 
Riley v. Barnard. 



Rinsche v. Sandherr 

Ripley v. Elson Glass Co.. 



189fr-63 
1867-493 



1879-264 
1880-136 
1898-274 



1894-260 



1898-246 

1904-601 
1891-233 
1893-41 
1893-42 



Reppeto V. Stevens 

Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. 
Medart 



Ritter 

Ritter v. Krakau 

Ritter v. Krakau and Connor 

Ritter v. Krakau and Connor, Jr. 



1891-136 

1893-12 

1902-416 

1892-127 

1893-37 

1892-134 

1893-37 

1903-273 

1892-467 

1893-328 

1896-29 

1903-272 
1895-330 
1896-357 



1891-242 

1902-69 

1903-183 
1904-44 



77-163 
10-607 
80-658 

120-906 
16-908 

86-1908 

90-448 

98-2365 

101-1612 

67-404 

92-189 
96-2062 

86-1078 
100-2176 
113-1147 

67-1698 



120-2764 
66-1203 

101-1832 
103-1164 

69-1919 

69-1921 

106-1780 
60-298 



106-1779 
71-761 
79-1195 
80-653 
87-699 
94-1787 
99-232 
99-18700 

67-1883 

84-1732 

98-1708 

98-2590 

104-1897 

108-1060 

110-1429 



41,42.171 



68,76 



171 

2, 93, 94 



106 
174 

66, 133 



12 
124 

164 



30 



122, 169 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



127 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Ritter v. Krakau and Connor, Jr. 

Roadhouse 

Rohn...- 

Roberts 



Roberts 

Roberts, v. BachelTe. 
Roberts v. Dyer 



Roberts v. Webster 

Robertson v. Lecombe Co . . . 
Robin V. Muller and Bonnet.. 

Robin V. Muller and Bonnet.. 
Robin V. Muller and Bonnet., 
Robin V. Muller and Bonnet.. 
Robins, Sr.v. Titus v. Titus. . 
Robins, Jr. v. Titus v. Titus. . 



Robinson 

Robinson 

Robinson 

Robinson v. Copeland.. 
Robinson v. Copeland.. 

Robinson v. Copeland.. 

Robinson v. Copeland.. 

Robinson v. Seelinger. . 
Robinson v. Sejrmour. . 



Robinson v. Thresher 

Robinson v. Thresher 

Robinson v. Townsend v. Copeland. 
Robinson v. Townsend v. Copeland. 

Robinson v. Townsend v. Copeland. 



1904r-310 

1883-106 

1887-61 

1889-131 

1889-199 

1889-235 

1890-11 

1890-170 

1893-87 

1890-61 
1902-416 
1876-439 
1894-158 



1904-14 

1904-201 
1904-669 
1904-671 
1904-164 
1904-267 



1902-433 
1903-346 



1901-227 
1903-13 

1903-218 
1904-664 



1886-98 
1888-16 
1890-161 



1902-263 
1902-406 

1903-327 



114-1563 

111-1368 

26-1190 

40-673 



61-166 
101-1831 
10-204 
87-2122 
92-1038 

116-2136 

3-412 
108-292 
113-2506 
110-1429 
113-2606 
113-2606 
110-310 
111-684 

111-810 
116-1732 

101-2079 
106-1242 
116-1684 
97-2631 
102-466 

106-263 
110-2017 

112-601 
123-2313 

116-1736 
33-113 



123-2627 

123-2976 

100-683 

101-1611 

107-269 

106-997 
111-1627 



148 
60 
66 
43,66 



66,66 
164, 



169 

22 

6,164 

122, 28 
12, 122 
122, 28, 
122 



64, 106 

127, 129 

76 

130 

16, 116, 

146 

126 



116 
113 



169 
169 
142 
164 

123, 
141, 164 



128 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Roby 


1900-118 
1870-111 
1871-169 
1874-54 

1889-436 

1902-412 
1879-207 
1879-333 
1879-333 
1879-207 
1902-646 

1889-664 

1877-368 

1889-227 
1890-40 
1890-122 
1891-94 

1890-121 
1899-96 

1883-106 


92-1036 


42 


Rockwell 


133, 139 


Rodebaucrli v. Jackson 


47-668 
98-228 

101-1830 
16-646 

16-1233 

99-2660 
107-540 
111-1364 
112-955 
114-766 
121-546 

49-1636 

101-2821 

12-796 

90-461 

49-1361 

62-460 
87-699 
94-1789 
26-1190 
120-2446 
111-1938 

91-820 
100-1329 

40-811 

21-1112 
96-2585 
89-706 ; 

116-593 
92-1036 

122-1722 
77-2141 
84-1283 

105-2060 

116-1451 




Rodenbaufifh and Laurentz 


41 


Rodgers 




Rodgers 


76 R 


Roe V. Hanson 




Roemer v. Neumann , . . , 




Roemer v. Simon, Simon, Simon and 
Rogers 


64,66 


Rogers 


37,64 


Rofirers & Winslow 




Rohn 


66 


"Rolb V- Hftrrinonvftv v. Ctirtis 


93 


Rolfe V. Tavlor 


1904-333 

1900-61 

1887-81 
1890-139 
1891-131 
1893-107 

1882-167 
1899-202 
1900-333 


3,164,166 


Rome Textile Co 


166, 169 


Root 


1 


Root V. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern 

Ry. Co. 
Rosback . . x . . . . 


56.170.196 


Rosell V. Allen 


37, 148 


Rosenheim ^ Moombel . 


66 


Ross V. Loewer 


1896-666 









PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



129 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


RULB 


Roth V. Brown and Stillman 


189&-49 

1893-6 

1899-181 

1876-33 

1875-74 

1875-99 

1875-100 

1875-101 

1875-118 

1903-101 


83-693 
93-940 

62-316 
87-357 

88-2242 
7-169 

104-1122 
114-2091 
116-593 

117-2029 

119-338 

49-1987 

80^47 
80-362 




Roth Grocery Co 




Rouse 


41,42,60 


'Rniisi» and Stoddard ,,,,,•,, ^ ,,,,, , 


93,94 


Ronsseau v. Brown. .....»», r r .,, t , - ^ t , t , 


148 


Rowand 


36, 197 


Rowley v. Mason 


1869-4 

1869-26 

1869-29 

186^58 

186(^78 

1870-12 

1870-21 

1870-43 

1870-50 




Rovce V ICemoshall 


147, 164 


Ro vce V- ICemoshall 




166 
169 


Rover v Roth 


1889-682 
1890-132 

1869-107 

1870-49 

1870-70 

1871-38 

1871-87 

1871-264 

1876-34 

1870-49 
1903-314 
1894-79 
1899-379 

1892-14 




Rubens & Co 


37 


Rubens & Co. Assifimees etc 




37 


Ruckrich and Bode 


106-766 

68-636 

87-2119 

88-1706 
89-1344 
102-1552 
110-1724 
117-280 
120-2130 
121-1981 

68-386 
81-1932 


48 


Rudd 


37 


Ruete V. Elwell 




Rueter v. Frist 









/ 



130 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



RumpflE and Graessler v. Kohler v. Krug- 
ener 

Rtindle 

Russell V. Asencio 

Russell V. Ascencia 

Russell 



Russell V. Scow. 



Ruthenburg 

Ryan 

Ryan v. Gould. 



Sack 

Sacroix and Welch 

Sadtler v. Carmichael v. Smith. 



Saint Amand 

Saint Louis Candy Co. 



Sanche 

Sanders 

Sanders v. Melvin , 

Sandman 

Sandstrom 

Sanford Mills v. Aveyard. 



Sarf ert 

Sarfert v. Meyer. 

Sarf ert v. Meyer. 
Sargent 



Sargent 

Sargent v. Burge. 
Sargent v. Btirge. 



Sartell. 
Sassin. , 



Saunders. 



1883-29 



1904-106 
1904-676 
1898-208 

1874r-23 
1874-63 
1876-48 



1887-663 
1891-186 

1902-187 
1873-166 
1899-32 

1903-106 
1902-362 

1897-32 
1878-66 



1901-229 

1899-129 

1902-38 
1902-438 

1904-120 

1877-126 

1878-151 

1879-14 

1876-176 

1877-62 

1878-28 

1888-10 

1889-135 



1883-23 

1889-219 
1889-250 
1890-111 
1890-136 



23-1831 
79-511 
116-693 
109-1606 
112-966 
84-2021 
115-250 
6-149 



121-337 
117-699 
41-1392 

99-2101 



86-1498 
91-1034 
103-661 
101-220 
114-973 
80-186 
13-818 
119-1921 
97-2632 
113-860 
88-386 
104-577 
102-1049 
101-2286 
107-267 
109-1886 
12-476 
43-753 
16-612 
10-286 
11-1066 
30-1092 
42-296 
80-1760 
122-2064 

23-1224 

52-309 

52-1062 



170 
116 
169 
30,31 

140 



69 
176, 176 



171 
93,94,106 



146 



66 

42 

94 

66,66 

6, 6, 17 

126 

122 



109 



41 

93,94 
37, 122 

41,63 

30,31,33, 
46 
76 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



131 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


S&wn 


1891-44 

1883-80 
1900-362 

1879-478 

1896-30 

1904-361 

1870-136 

1872-205 

1874-20 

1876-115 

1876-144 

1880-181 

1892-147 

1904-347 

1896-96 

1898-77 
1898-524 


64-1661 
84-1871 

26-697 
93-940 
111-300 
16-43 
84-2021 

76-1118 
111-2223 


41,42,145 


Sawyer and Man v. Edison 


171 


Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co 

Sayles v. Richmond, Fredericksbtirg & 

Potomac Ry. Co. 
Schaeffer 


28 


Schellenback v Harris 


22, 163 


Schenck v. Rider 


110, 122 


Schilling 


60-160 

111-2222 

77-1784 

83-1511 

83-1611 

84-985 

77-1784 

121^1676 
116-249 
100-2602 
107-541 
110-603 
67-696 
100-684 

66-1663 
97-1595 

121-688 
116-606 
116-1185 

68-668 
89-1862 

44-1400 

101-1830 
119-1924 

13-696 
123-2974 
116-2008 
120-2127 
110-2016 
116-1186 


126 
166 


Schermer v. Lindemann and Stock 

Schmertz v. Appert 


122, 126 
76, 110 


Schmertz v. Appert 




Schmid 


69 


Schmidmer 




30,49 


Schmidt 


1902-327 

1904-166 
1891-188 

1891-160 


68 


Schmidt 


70, 133 


Schmiedl v. Booth 




Schmiedl v. Walden 


139 


Schmitt and Tanody 


68, 171 


Schmohl 




79 


Schnabel v. Schellaberger 


1894-96 

1888-606 
1892-210 

1902-412 




Schneider v. Williams 




Schofield 


41 


Schofield V. McGovem v. Woods 


124 


Schoonmakpr 


1878-40 


34,60,66 


Schoonmaker v. Sintz 


110 


Schoshusen 




34, 36 


Schrader 




68 


Schraubstadter 


1904r-229 


41,42,79 
79 


Schraubstadter 



132 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


C.G. 


0. D. 


Rule 


Schraubstadter 




120-1167 
69-1103 


81,82 


Schribner and Warner v. Childs and Balsley 


1892-104 








63-1961 
82-1419 




Schribner and Warner v. Childs and Balsley 


1893-81 


63-1961 

59-1103 
106-264 




Schubert v. Munro 


1904-460 


113-283 


2, 48, 94, 






113-284 


124 


Schultz 


190^366 
1888-4 


111-249 
42-293 


46,174,176 


Schulze - Berge 


4,79 






84-311 
89-2068 




Schtilze. r , 




114-1660 
100-2776 


96, 146 


SchiiDDhaus 


1902-339 


66, 122, 








132, 146 


Schiipphaus v. Stevens 


1901-366 


96-1462 


124, 146 






100-2776 
102-1296 
112-1216 
114-2383 




Schwarzwalder v. New York Filter Co 


1896-613 


72-1043 
78-1255 




Schweitzer 


1901-179 


97-1371 


66, 124 






107-834 

107-1378 

116-2009 




Scott 


1901-69 


96-2683 


36,36 


Scott 


1902-268 


100-681 


77 


Scott 




114-260 
117-278 
116-2007 
71-1314 
78-1904. 


70 


Scott 




70 


Scott V. Biadeau 




124 


Scott V. Brooks 


1896-814 








Scott V. Emmet and Hewlett 




116-1184 
119-1184 
H9-2233 


122 


Scott V Emmet and Hewlett 












Scott V. Emmet and Hewlett 




119-2233 
14-413 
40-807 


122, 130 


Scott V. Ford 


1878-106 


37, 122 






Scott V. Hayes and Berger 




121-2326 


122 


Scott V. Southcrate 




121-689 


116 


Scriven 


1891-204 


67-1128 


66 


Seabiiry. '. 


1904-222 


110-2013 


37 


Seaman v. Brooks 


1902-267 


inO-fi«/> 


113, 122 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



133 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Secor and Secor v. Knapp. 



Secretary's Decision. 
Secretary's Decision. 



Seeberger v. Dodge. 
Seeberger v. Dodge. 



Seeley v. Baldwin 

Segelhorst 

Seibert v. Bloomberg. 
Seidler v. Goldberg. . . 



Seitzimger 

Selden v. Gerts and Palmer. 
Selle 



Sellers. 



Sellers. 



Sellers 

Sellon V. Hochhausen. 



Sendelbach v. Gillette. 



Sergeant 

Sessions v. Romadka. 



Sessions v. Romadka. 



1893-62 

1894-111 
1895-95 

1896-96 

1904-606 



1904-126 



1902-333 
1903-262 
1904-221 



1870-68 
1872-197 

1872-197 
1889-139 
1897-164 
1886-103 
1889-247 
1890-187 

1904-697 



1876-101 
1884-340 



1892-382 



63-612 

93-939 

109-2171 

69-639 
70-493 
70-493 
122-352 
113-1416 
114-2382 
113-1415 
119-2382 
119-2521 
120-2130 
123-2631 
123-2312 
123-2313 

117-2633 

109-1887 

124-628 

110-696 

116-505 

100-2773 

106-1631 

110-1728 

113-1147 

113-1967 

113-1968 

113-2505 



37-781 
95-2486 

2-246 

81-803 
33-996 



109-276 

122-3016 

123-1288 

9-963 
28-721 
59-939 
84-1281 
84-1283 

69-939 
28-721 
96-2584 
99-1870 
123-324 



176 

176 

122 
ro, 148, 116 



64,81 

126 

61 

60 

124 

41,42 



79, 209 

24,37 

146 
116 



41, 146 



134 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Severy 


1901-244 


97-2745 


68 






109-1609 




Sewell V. Jones 


1876-255 


9-47 






1876-96 








1895-157 


' 




Sexton 


1873-66 
1876-25 










Sexton 


1876-25 
1893-127 


9-251 
65-751 


177 


Seymour 


133 




1894-2 






Seymour, Com. of Patents v. United States 


1897-372 


79-509 




of America] 




83-1806 








89-1862 

95-1454 

101-1134 




Shaffer v. Dolan 


1902-344 


100-3012 
100-3013 


153 






Shaffer v. Dolan 


1904-592 


108-2146 
112-1480 


110 






Shallenberger v. Andrews 


1902-346 


100-313 


122 


Shaltefs 


1879-79 
1900-65 


15-970 
91-1034 


37 


Sharer v. McHenry 


37,78,124 






98-585 




Sharer v. McHenry 


1902-503 


98-585 








91-1034 








102-1552 








103-1684 








106-1501 








115-506 








118-1071 




Shaw 


1890-31 
1902-348 


50-1129 
100-3014 


35 


Shaw V. Gaily 


112 


Shaw V. Keith, Shaw and Videto 


1876-69 
1876-110 


9-641 


28 


Shearman 


1898-190 


84-1730 
91-1616 




Shedlock et al v. Hannay et al 


1890-4 


50-166 


26 


Sheldon 


1878-44 


13-817 


37 


Shellaberger v. Schnabel 


1897-364 


79-339 
85-1740 




Shellaberger v. Sommer 


1896-292 


74-1897 
107-540 




Shepard 


1872-244 




41,42 




1874-58 


3-522 




Shepard 


1892-162 


60-575 


68 


Shepard v. Carrigan 


1886-116 


34-1157 








93-1125 





PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



135 



TITLE 



Shepler. . . 
Shcppard. 



Sheppafd v. Webb. . . 

Sheridan v. Latus 

Sherman 

Sherman and Harms. 



Sherman Mfg. Co.... 

Sherwood v. Horton, Cato & Co. 



Shettler. 



SheviU 

Shiels V. Lawrence. 



Shiels V. Lawrence and Kennedy. 



Shinn 

Shinn v. McElroy. 
Shippen 



Shoeninger. 
Shone 



Shrum v. Baumgarten 

Shimk 

Shuter v. Davis 

Sibbald v. Cassidy and Smith . 
Sibbard v. Cassidy and Smith. 



CD. 



1903-17 
1870-22 
1871-181 
1879-143 

1901-32 
1883-76 
1875-60 
1899-240 

1902-475 
1898-629 



1892-142 
1893-130 

1902-469 
1899-68 



1897-184 

1879-192 
1889-186 

1891-35 
1892-14 

1876-126 
1876-32 
1876-174 
1878-144 

1878-128 
1902-155 



1903-150 

1870-10 
1873-70 
1883-330 

1892-214 
1892-223 

1892-223 
1892-214 
1893-133 



O. G. 



102-468 



94-1577 
25-501 

7-1054 

89-2067 

92-1437 

101-3105 

107-1973 

84-2018 

100-3011 

103-2173 

114-2089 

60-158 

101-2824 
87-180 
100-3013 
110-1429 
115-1328 

81-2085 
87-180 
16-458 
89-2259 

54-1115 

8-727 



15-384 

99-863 

99-2549 

101-3106 

115-250 

104-577 
115-1328 



24-303 
97-1840 

61-563 

61-1165 



Rule 



37 

78 



116, 122 
31,40 
37 
42,81,133 



41 



37,41 



79 
67,69,145 



122, 126 



171 
75 

1 



136 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 




1903-143 


103-2172 


122, 126 


Siemens 


1877-41 


11-1107 


28,46.84 






30-1321 


Siemens 


1877-76 


11-969 


41 




1877-41 

1879-5 

1879-70 


30-1321 




Siemens 


1877-98 


12-626 


88 


Silleman 


1886-1 
1904-46 


34-1389 
108-1061 


64 


Silsby 


2,66 
113 


wruwh^j «. 

Silver v. Eustis 


1902-91 
1899-173 


98-2361 
88-1703 
93-940 
96-^843 
97-2742 
99-445 
106-763 
115-S03 


Silverman v. Hendrickson 


124 






Silverman v. Hendrickson . . . 


1902-123 


99-446 


6,70,110 






99-1171 
99-1388 
106-767 


Silverman v, Hendrickson. 


1902-627 
1902-123 

1894-64 


99-1171 
99-2548 

114-1265 
67-811 
83-916 
92-2508 

103-^91 


116 


Silvers 








Simonds 


1870-23 

1870-14 

1871-264 

1872-150 

1875-66 

1875-108 




37 








Simonds 


1888-78 


44-446 






1888-89 
1889-135 


97-1174 




Simonds. 


1888-89 ^ 


44-449 






1888-78 
1893-95 


92-1798 




Simonds 




114-1649 


94,2 


Simonson 


1890-177 
1891-134 


63-1671 


16 


Simpson & Sons 


1876-148 


10-333 






1877-45 
1878-14 






Sinclair v. Backus , 


1880-629 


17-1603 
97-401 









PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



137 



TITLE 



Sindingchristensen. , 
Singer. ; 



Singer Mfg. Co. v. June Mfg. Co. 



Skinner 

Skinner v. Murray.. 



Slaughter 

Slaughter v. Halle. 



Slawson v. The Grand St., Prospect Park 

&FlatbushRy.Co.. 
Smith 



Smith. 
Smith. 

Smith. 
Smith. 
Smith. 



Smith. 
Smith. 

Smith. 



Smith. 
Smith. 

Smith, 



CD. 



1870-146 

1870-183 

1873-60 

1874-49 

1874-95 

1896-687 



1881-12 
1903-429 

1903-227 
1902-619 



1883-313 

1890-67 

1870-114 

1871-190 

1874-99 

1879-216 

1880-149 

1880-61 

1880-77 

1888-131 

1890-168 

1891-67 

1891-244 

1892-70 
1896-99 

1897-170 



1898-276 
1902-76 

1902-196 



O. G. 



120-2766 



76-1703 
81-802 
83-1993 
84-807 
100-450 

19-662 
107-642 

106-498 
102-469 
112-731 
112-732 
114-976 
115-508 

24-99 



6-470 
16-630 

17-271 
17-447 
44-1183 



68-1840 

71-297 

98-2589 

81-969 

81-2086 

82-338 

84-^311 

89-2068 

98-230 

86-2091 
99-1625 

98-1971 

99-862 

100-2177 

99-2647 



Rule 



66,66 



37 

107.126, 
171 

133, 134 
146 



37 
37.41 

41 
93.94.130 



70 
209 

79 



41.42 



138 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Smith 


1902-387 
1894-117 

1887-616 

1891-486 

1895-29 

1895-32 

1900-176 

1901-231 
1886-12 

1876-6 

1876-83 

1877-31 

1900-179 

1881-34 
1899-313 

1875-62 
1876-124 
1877-171 
1879-185 


101-1369 
66-173 
97-401 
41-1037 
94-2168 
97-401 

66-1449 

93-939 

94-585 

97-2533 

30-343 

81-331 

81-332 

84-810 

7-1 

93-1123 

97-1374 

20-742 

87-893 

88-718 

91-1437 

7-827 

11-246 

23-1831 

79-685 

80-360 

80-521 

83-1991 

87-1959 

92-1233 

116-2009 
9-688 

123-1990 
85-161 

63-912 
89-1671 
94-2167 
98-229 
105-2062 
121-1678 


171 


Smith & Davis Mf?. Co. v. Mellon 




Smith & Griggs Mfg. Co. v. Sprague 

Smith & Egge Mfg. Co. v. Bridgeport 
Chain Co. 

Smith and Hovland 


70 


Smith and Kimble 


6, 39, 40 


Smith and Thomas v. Cowles 


106, 113 


Smith V. Barter 




Smith V Carmichael 


109, 103 


Smith V. Dimond 


101, 128 


Smith V Duell Com. of Patents 




Smith V Edson 




Smith V. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co. 
and Bacon. 

Smith V- Locklin 


2, 144 


Smith V. Perrv 


1876-12 

1877-14 

1877-16 

1878-141 

1880-69 


93, 101 


Smith V. Slocum 


126 


Smith V. Warner 


1898-213 

1898-517 

1893-324 

1896-25 

1896-28 




Smith V Whitman Saddle Co 









PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



139 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Smott 


1877-61 

1889-103 

1889-229 

1871-84 


11-1010 


139, R 
50 


Smyth 


Smyth 


114-762 

66-1309 
101-2572 
103-890 
103-890 
101-2572 
106-544 
109-1071 
110-2017 
111-809 
121-338 

121-338 
80-1271 
81-505 
82-894 
86-182 
91-1034 
95-1451 
98-2172 
107-541 
116-1186 

22-1975 
82-894 
82-895 
89-1144 
97-1600 
97-2980 
115-1065 

110-2236 
58-1840 
92-2508 

119-1922 
120-1823 
122-1922 
123-2309 
124-319 

10-3 
96-1239 
115-2136 
10-587 
91-1616 
97-551 
70-921 


65, 145, 


Snider 


1894-23 
1902-460 

1903-117 


171 
65,66 


Snider v. Bunnell 


31,93,126 
126, 99 

126 


Snider v. Bunnell 


Snider v. Bunnell 


Snow 


1897-48 

1882-22 

1904-242 
1892-71 
1893-63 
1896-33 


37.«142 


Snyder 

Snyder 


70 
41, 42 


Snvder v. ICannebersf 




Sobey v. Holsclaw 


122, 124 


Sobinski 


1876-161 
1901-100 

1876-190 
1900-71 

1895-182 
1896-77 


126 
41 


Sodafoam Bakind* Powder Co 




SolKuh 


37,f41 


Soley : 


Solev V. Hebbard 









140 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Soley V. Peck v. Clement v. Richards v. 

Meissner. 
Solomons v. United States 



Sorenson 

Sorlle 

South Carolina v. Seymour, Com. of Patents 



South Carolina v. Seymour, Com. of Patents 



Spalding and Aldrich and Winchester. 



Sparks v. Small 

Spaulding v. Norden. 



Spear.. 



Speckbauch.. 



Sperry.. 



Sperry — 
Spielman. 
Spielman. 



Spill V. The Celluloid Mfg. Co.. 
Spiller 



Spindler v. Nathan and Bolze. 

Sponsel V. Darling 

Spooner 

Springbom 

Springer 

Squire 



Stacey., 



1903-269 

1891-267 
1892-127 
1892-131 

1902-16 
1900-42 
1894-174 



1894-318 



1871-94 
1871-90 

1904-647 
112-439 

1874-26 
1877-122 

1891-36 
1892-12 
1892-103 
1893-121 

1870-139 
1871-64 



1891-162 
1892-1 

1884-462 
1891-197 

1902-190 

1904-133 
1903-229 
1870-94 
1902-142 



106-1262 

170-1430 

64-266 



98-416 

90-2133 

66-1167 

ov— ovo 

93-1491 

95-229 

67-1191 

84-808 

86-1803 



113 



66 
76 



1877-388 



1904-46 



113-1970 
112-2091 
112-2092 

6-201 
29-177 

64-1266 

84-1281 

84-1282 

87-514 

98-2364 



121-687 
66-1707 
68-141 

108-2145 

29-773 

99-2320 
101-1830 

109-2171 
106-498 

99-667 

120-2764 

12-1026 

78-1740 

108-1060 
113-2504 



16. 104, 
,108, 110 

6,6 
6,126,164 

93,94 

41,42 



68, 171 
142 

26, 142, 
163 



171 

121 
121, 163 

64 
133. 171 



41 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



141 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Standard Fashion Co 

Standard Plunger Elevator Co. 



Stanley 

Stanley v. Slattery . 



Stapleton v. Com. of Patents. 
Stapleton v. Com. of Patents. 
Stapleton v. Kinney 



Star Distillery Co.. 
Starkey 



Starkey 

Starkey 

Starling v. The St. Paul Plow Works . 



Star Lotion Remedy Co . 
Starr 



Starr 

Starr and Peyton v. Farmer.. 



Starr and Peyton v. Farmer., 



State of South Carolina v. Se5rmour, Com. 
of Patents 



State of South Carolina v. Sejmaour, Com. 
of Patents 



Stead.... 
Steames. 



1899-187 
1904-423 



1892-166 
1893-108 
1891-46 
1892-21 

1900-409 
1901-369 
1901-414 



1903-239 

1903-261 
1903-607 
1887-601 
1891-164 
1902-330 

1879-91 



1903-296 
1883-34 
1889-38 
1890-90 

1883-116 
1889-38 

1894-174 



1894-318 



1903-443 

1890-49 

1892-96 



89-189 
118-1938 
112-1480 
114-2381 
115-248 

60-736 

64-1709 

93-2632 

96-1049 

96-1432 

113-1145 

120-2444 

121-964 

121-1676 

104-2160 

121-1012 

121-1013 

106-746 

106-1269 

41-818 

100-2603 

103-660 

16-1063 

40-692 

101-1834 

106-263 
23-2326 



23-2327 

66-1167 
84-808 
93-1491 
95-229 

67-1191 

O^t 0\fO 

86-1803 
107-834 
60-1768 
80-1760 
84-1281 
84-1282 
87-514 
95-633 
101-2078 



179 



86 



140 
140 



88 



142 
86 



63,64 



66,66 
114 



66 
41 



142 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Steams & Co. v. Russell 


1898-541 


84-1434 
100-236 








Steams v. Prescott 


1878-24 
1899-163 


13-121 
88-1335 


101 


Stebbins 








103-1680 




Steck 


1902-9 


98-228 


66,79 


Steinhilber 


1891-236 


57-1720 


41 


Steinmetz 




117-901 
104-853 


41, 139 


Steinmetz v. Allen. Com. of Patents 


1903-578 


41,42 






102-231 








109-549 




Steinmetz v. Allen, Com. of Patents , 


1903-632 


102-231 
104-853 
109-549 


41,42 


Steinmetz v. Allen, Com. of Patents 


1904-703 


109-549 

102-231 

104-853 

109-1338 

109-1339 

109-1610 

109-1888 

110-1728 

110-2016 

110-2236 

111-1038 

111-1040 

112-1752 


41, 135 






113-1147 


.'•' 






113-1968 








113-2505 








115-248 








115-^2 








117-901 








117-904 








117-1166 








118-270 








118-1685 








122-1050 




Steinmetz v. Hewitt 


1904-489 


107-1972 
110-1429 


126 


Steinmetz v. Thomas 




119-1260 
16-316 


122 


Stempel 


1879-161 


66 




1880-144 






Stephen v. Bailey 


1878-7 


13-45 


97,99 


Stephenson v. Goodell 


1876-133 


9-1195 






1876-220 


88-1159 






1879-28 






Stem 


1896-35 


76-1417 


68 


Stetson \ 


1884-20 


36-843 


133 


Stevenot 


1904-337 


111-1939 


63 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



143 



T.TLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Stevens. 



Stevens. 



Stevens 

Stevens and Powers . 



Stevens v. Field v. Seher. 



Stevens et al v. Seher. 



1872-43 
1876-123 

1892-87 



1869-63 
1869-81 
1879-82 

1897-177 
1897-761 

1897-761 



Stevens v. Putman 

Stevens v. Putman 

Stevens v. Sehr 

Stevenson 

Steward v. Ellis v. Lee v. Howe. 



1880-160 
1880-164 

1880-164 
1880-160 
1889-153 

1897-761 
1897-177 



1903-238 
1889-243 
1890-183 



Stewart v. Einstein v. Sawhill 

Stier 

Stiff V. Galbraith 

Stocker 

Stocking. 

Stockton 

Stockwell V. Haines 



1892-209 

1904-166 

1904-10 

1902-63 

1902-468 

1897-24 

1877-82 



1-225 

59-299 
80-2038 

119-1258 



81-1929 
82-1687 
87-1401 

81-1932 
88-2241 
95-1453 
95-1454 
82-1689 
115-806 
123-2313 

18-519 



18-520 



81-1932 

82-1689 
88-2241 
95-1453 
95-1454 
115-806 

105-744 
49-1983 
82-384 
86-1636 
88-2409 
89-1342 
89-1862 
78-1904 
96-844 

61-287 
122-1726 

110-599 
108-290 
98-1705 
111-2221 

101-2823 
79-683 
12-137 



5,6 



67 



142 



41 



66 

168 

65,66 

41 
15 
88 



144 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Stoddard v. Perry. 



Stone 

Stone 

Stone V. Greaves., 



Stone V. Greaves 

Stone V. Rutin and Seblanc. 



Stone V. Pupin. 



Story v.Criswell. 
Stover V. Clark... 



Stow 

Stow V. The City of Chicago. 



Strain 

Strasburger & Co 

Streat v. Freckleton. 



Strobel & Wilken Co.. 

Strong 

Stroud v. Miller 

Struble 

Struble v. Yotmg 

Struble v. Young 



Stuart.. . .-. 

Stuart 

Stuart 

Stuckgold. 
Sturges 



Sturgis V. Hopewell., 
Sturgis V. Hopewell., 



Sttutevant 

Sturtevant and Sturtevant . 



1874-62 

1875-39 
1879-28 

1873-106 

1902-434 

1880-70 

1880-23 

1880-23 

1880-70 

1898-191 



1902-560 

1902-269 

1902-262 

1877-92 

1879-28 

1873-30 

1882-131 

1894-158 

1870-75 



1899-85 



1903-285 
1891-176 
1902-423 
1904-97 



1904-86 

1904-485 

1870-15 

1903-307 

1872-36 

1872-47 



1904-82 



1904-26 
1902-76 



6-33 



4-64 

101-2080 

17-397 

17-260. 
83-1805 

84-1713 
101-1371 
107-269 

100-1113 

100-683 
3-322 
12-188 
30-1092 

3-322 
21-790 
92-1038 
87-2122 

122-1726 
87-696 
98-227 

104-580 

106-2068 

57-274 

101-2076 

109-1336 

119-338 

121-339 

121-340 

109-1069 

113-860 

21-1111 

106-645 

1-204 

109-1008 
109-1067 
111-2222 
119-2236 

108-663 
98-1971 
99-862 



24,66 

70.78.93 

76 

128 



124. 133 



41 



142 
122 



170 
213 

119, 159 
128 
167 
122. 126 

66 
4.42 



77 



126 
122 



60,}51 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



145 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Stutz V. Armstrong & Son. 



Stuver 

Sullivan v. Thomson. 



Sumner 

Summers v. Hart., 



Suter 

Sutter V. McDonnell v. Jolly v. Veff . 



Sutton and Steele 

Sutton V. Steele and Steele 

Swain Turbine & Mfg. Co. v. Ladd. 



Swain v. Holyoke Machine Co. 

Swantusch 

Swift 

Swift V. Jenks 



Swihart.. 



Swihart v. Matddin. 



Swihart v. Mauldin. 



Tabor. 



Tainter 

Talbot v.Monell. 



1884-297 
1896-46 

1902-381 
1901-21 

1871-180 
1873-19 

1902-104 



1892-112 
1894-47 

1902-47 



1903-427 



1877-166 
1881-62 

1901-479 
1902-377 
1904-365 
1884-208 
1890-10 

1900-10 



1902-137 
1902-540 

1902-640 
1902-137 



1901-88 



1889-133 
1890-51 

1902-216 



28-367 

101-1130 

94-586 

105-1263 

73-19 



98-2686 
99-1386 
110-2235 
113-548 

69-1431 
82-894 

98-1484 
10O-<»4 
100-890 

107-641 

121-1012 

11-163 



97-400 
101-1129 
111-2494 

27-621 



90-601 

90-2002 

92-2159 

107-1661 

99-665 
99-666 
99-2322 

99-2322 
104-1124 
114-2383 
120-2130 
123-1288 

95-1036 
107-835 
109-1069 
103-1913 

47-135 



99-2966 
101-1833 
111-1038 



41, 113 
;122 

37,41 

76, 122 



133, 146 



96, 122 
109 



68 

41,70 
66,96.133 



6,110 



41,42 



167, 169 



146 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Tallmadge. 



Tallman. 



Tannage Patent Co. v. Adams. 



Tannage Patent Co. v. Zahn . 



Tannage Patent Co. v. Zahn. 



Taupenot.. 
Taylor.... 



Taylor 

Taylor 

Taylor and|Banks 

Taylor and Taylor v. Lowrie. 
Taylor and Lockett 



Taylor v. Shreffler 

Teller 

Templeton 

Templin v. Sergeant , 

Thatcher Heating Co. v. Btirtis. 



Thayer. 



Thayer 

Thayer 

Thayer V.Hart. 



1903-205 



1898-10 



1897-353 
1895-367 

1896-119 
1897-495 
1895-367 
1896-120 



1896-119 

1895-367 

1897-353 

1904-513 

1870-3 

1872-30 

1903-461 



1872-239 
1900-198 

1883-63 

1904-468 

1880-128 



1887-320 
1890-132 
1894-160 
1895-325 

1891-274 



Theberath v. The Rubber & Celluloid 
Harness Trimming Co. 



1884-319 
1890-149 
1883-205 
1888-8 



Theodar and Carl Weil. 
Thie 



1870-61 
1880-69 



104-2443 
103-299 
108-288 
111-2223 

82-337 
83-1994 
89-2068 
98-230 

79-158 

92-1036 

93-811 

71-1161 
79-158 
92-1036 
93-811 

74-143 

92-1036 

93-811 

113-1418 



106-1098 
114-1265 

2-519 

123-1991 

93-2531 

97-1374 

24-1175 
113-548 

17-910 
119-961 

39-587 

78-1107 



54-957 
113-852 

118-2252 

122-1724 

28-542 

23-1121 

84-649 

90-1949 

122-352 



179 



40 

43, 175 
76 
154 



171 
64,68,133 
65 
96, 122 



68 
171 



175 
76 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



147 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Thomas.. 



Thomas 

Thomas v. Reese. 



Thomas v. Reese. 



Thomas v. Trissel 
Thome 



Thompson 

Thompson 

Thompson 

Thompson 

Thompson v. Boisselier.. 



Thomson . 



Thomson 

Thomson 

Thomson 

Thomson and Unbehend v. Hisley. 



1900-116 



1879-336 

1880-13 

1880-21 

1880-12 
1881-10 
1881-40 

1901-200 

1869-76 

1870-151 

1871-126 

1871-127 

1881-17 

1879-210 

1902-6 

1903-420 

1904-666 

1886-224 



1891-138 



1894^8 



Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Elmira 
& Horseheads Ry. Co. 



Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Hoosick 
Ry.Co. 

Thompson-Houston Electric Co. v. Kelsey 
Electric Ry. Specialty Co. 

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio 
Brass Co. 

Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Union 
Ry. Co. 



1894-43 



1896-122 



92-1036 
101-1609 

124-623 
16-1234 



17-196 

21-1875 

79-511 

97-1697 
105-1263 



1897-612 
1896-608 

1897-679 
1898-440 



68, 134 
93,94 



27,93,94 



16-688 
98-227 
107-270 
113-2604 
31-377 
78-2049 
80-966 

66-1203 
84-1142 

66-663 
118-266 
120-2766 
66-1696 
82-185 
84-1584 

74-144 
80-661 
80-969 
85-936 
89-2653 
02-384 
120-2446 

80-967 
110-2234 

7^2008 
80-659 
880-^2 

80-664 
92-384 

83-697 
110-2234 



37 



39 
96 

208, 209 
171 



133, 204 

41,42 

68 

37.66.66 



41.42 



41. 42 



148 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Thomson-Houstoa Electric Co. v. Win 
Chester Ave. Ry. Co. 



Thomson v. Waterhouse.. 



Thomson v. Weston. 
Thomson v. Weston. 



Thome. 



Thorpe v. White and White. 



Thorpe v. White 

Thorpe v. White 

Thorsen 

Thorsten Von Zweibegk 

Thullen v. Young and Townsend.. 
Thullen v. Young and Townsend.. 

Thurman 

Thurman 



Thurmond . 



Tucker Mfg. Co. v. Boyington., 



Tieman, Simpson and Collins., 
Tilghman v. Proctor 



1895-788 



1885-2 
1888-16 
1892-57 
1893-133 

1901-24 
1902-521 



1869-76 

1870-151 

1871-126 

1871-127 

1881-17 

1900-46 
1900-M 

1900-66 
1900-46 
1893-75 
1904-176 



1886-30 

1888-133 

1889-172 

1876-313 



1877-1 
1881-163 



73-2155 
80-662 
92-384 
88-386 
8^1342 
100-3013 

30-177 
90-226 
99-2319 

94-986 
99-864 
105-498 
106-1241 
106-1507 
107-266 
106-2018 
111-1365 
114-766 



Timker. 



1883-58 



91-227 

91-1435 

91-227 

63-1688 

110-859 

118-2251 

120-904 

.93-1721 

111-1625 

111-1626 

37-217 



9-455 
84-808 

11-1 

19-859 

78-2048 

87-1076 

87-1962 

87-2121 

92-1038 

94-1787 

24-1089 



116 



126 



37 



114. 116 

108 

37 

46 

122, 124 

153 

65 

95,96 

68 



42, 145 



85,87 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



149 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Tizley 899-248 



Tvie.. 
Todd. 



Tcx)iney 

Topliffv. Topliflf. 

Totimier 



890-28 
889-217 

869-109 

872-66 

873-153 

892-402 

893-108 

894-24 

894-26 

896-47 

896-61 

900-37 



Totirnier 901-306 



Toumier 

Towers v. Pease. , 



Townsend 

Townsend v. Copeland v. Robinson. 

Townsend v. Copeland v. Robinson. 



: 904-36 
] 878-6 

1871-60 
1871-145 



Townsend v. Corey. 
Tracy 



Tracy 

Tracy v. Leslie. 



875-80 
U79-42 

900-12 
899-306 



Traitel.. 
Traudt. 



1883-92 
.902-321 



89-2259 

90-2133 

50-992 

49-732 

88-1161 



2, 94, 96 

37, 145 
171 



59-1257 
79-1368 
94-2360 
96-2578 
105-1259 

90-1948 
94-1970 
94-2166 

94-2166 
98-229 
108-798 

108-798 
13-176 
30-1092 ; 



51 



75, 126 



126,146 



] 19-2523 

120-906 

120-2445 

121-1013 

124-317 

124-623 

119-2523 

124-317 

119-2237 
8-144 

94-431 

87-891 

92-1038 

95-1454 

87-2121 

89-1344 

17-280 

20-2130 

25-783 
89-1344 

.00-2383 
16-593 



L22, 124 



L22 



107. 124 
50 

26 



79 



150 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Tratit and Traut v. Disston and Moore 


1870-99 
1899-296 

1895-125 

1896-355 
1896-321 

1901-170 

1898-160 

1892-444 
1903-141 
1904-25 
1900-14 

1875-19 
1876-102 

1870-123 
1872-198 
1889-139 

1902-397 

1904-282 
1904-680 

1901-141 

1874-97 
1901-140 

1872-188 
1873-80 
1875-8 
1876-223 




122 


Traver v. Brown ' 


86-1324 

87-2122 

94-1188 

94-1970 

95-324 

95-1648 

108-2144 

115-252 

117-280 

87-700 
94-1789 

75-678 
87-700 
97-1174 

97-1173 
108-796 
111-253 
113-284 

84-1283 

93-1917 

101-2288 

103-2171 

108-563 

90-749 

95-1853 

122-2065 

7-3 




Travers v. American Cordage Co 




Travers v. Gem Hammock & Fly Net Co 

Trevette 


67,70,139 


Trevette v. Dexter 




Trioler v. Linde 


24 


Trioo V. Wolff v. Tones 


116,J122 
2, 4, 154 


Tripp V. Wolff V. Jones 


Trooenas . 




Trotter v. Bartlett 




Truesdell 


37 


Trufant v. Prindle v. Brown 

Trufant v. Prindle v. Brown 

Tschimer 


101-1608 

111-1035 

97-187 
99-2969 
101-1129 
101-1612 
101-2824 
107-1661 
110-1728 

6-470 

97-187 

104-1119 

2-224 


93,{121, 

126 

119 

42 


Tucker 


41 


Tucker... 


83,84 


Tucker and Davis v. Tucker Mfg. Co. v. 
Boyington 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



151 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Tucker v. Kahler 

Turner 

Turner. 

Turner 

Turner, VanBeek and Brown. 

Turner v. Bensinger 

Tuttle 



Tuttle 

Tuttle 

Tuttle 

Tuttle V. Claflin. 



Tweddle. 



Tyler. 

Tyler. 
Tyler. 



Tyler v. Amond. 
Tyler V. Arnold. 



Tyler v. Kelch 

Tjrmerson and Borland . 



1879-71 

1894-36 

1902-329 

1902-429 

1891-165 

1903-53 

1870-3 

1880-69 

1900-25 

1904-537 



Tyne 

Tyson 

Ubelacker v. Brill 

Uhlig 

XJUman Einstein Company v. Graves & Sons 

Underwood 

Underwood 

Underwood 



1896-602 

1876-221 
1876-227 
1902-268 
1902-320 
1902-269 
1902-320 
1902-268 
1901-301 
1898-172 



1902-506 
1898-48 

1880-2 

1902-476 

1899-118 
1903-300 



1870-52 

1870-91 
1873-75 
1874-99 

1872-118 
1872-120 



15-966 

66-1593 

100-2603 

101-2078 

56-1708 

102-1551 



90-1365 
113-1967 
117-1796 
77-973 
78-1739 
10-747 

100-686 

100-286 
100-2177 

94r-1969 

84-1584 

88-386 

108-2146 

98-1282 
103-226 
83-593 
85-289 
85-936 
89-2069 
98-2066 
98-2365 

17-56 
33-1390 

101-3105 
103-662 

87-1783 
106-541 
121-1978 
122-1724 



107, 153 

24,65.66 

5,6 

50 

133 

121 

76 

50 
41.42,133 
171 



37 



41,42 
41,42 

94 



1-549 
1-551 



37,41 

41,42.67. 
145 

109 
41.42 



37 



34.88 
133 



152 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



OTITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Underwood v. Grerber. 



Union Paper Bag Co. v. Pultz and Walkley 

Co. 
Union Paper Bag Machine Co. and Cupples 

V. Murphy and Murphy 
United States of America and Bemardin 

V. Butterworth, Com. of Patents 

United States of America and Koechlin 
and Witt v. Marble, Com. of Patents 

United States of America and The Bronson 

Co. V. Duell, Com. of Patents 
United States of America and National 

Phonograph Co. v. Allen, Com. of Patents 
United States of America v. The American 

Bell Telephone Co. and Emile Berliner 

United States of America and Stienmetz 
V. Allen, Com. of Patents. 

United States of America v. Steffens. 
United States V. Wittemann, 

United States of America and Stienmetz 
V. Allen, Com. of Patents. 



1889-519 48-116 

1890-21 80-1278 

1879-386 16-423 
1880-597 

1878-199 13-366 

1878-92 97-554 

1898-403 82-1991 
87-360 
96-996 

1882-442 22-1365 
82-894 
84-1729 

l|901-330 95-229 
98-229 
1902-571 [101-1133 |l2 

L03-1914 

1879-442 79-1362 

92-382 

96-2578 

102-1297 

904-578 3 04-853 l|33, 145 
102-231 
109-549 

1879-619 16-999 
82-1210 
95-203 

1904-703 tl09-549 ^1 

36-1147 
109-1610 
110-1728 
110-2016 
110-2236 
111-1338 

36-1968 
111-1937 
115-248 
115-^802 
117-904 
117-901 
117-1166 
118-270 



United States of America v. The American 
Bell Telephone Co. 

United States of America v. The American 
Bell Telephone Co. 

United States of America v. The American 
Bell Telephone Co. and Emile Berliner 



1888-558 
1891-161 

1894-701 



L895-665 



45-1311 
78-1363 

69-1778 
79-1363 

73-1285 
79-1363 
79-1368d 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



153 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


United States Credit System v. American 
Indemnity Co. 


1892-664 


61-1169 
118-591 




United States Electric Co. v. Com. of 


^891-271 


54-267 




Patents 




79-683 




United States ex rel, Pollock v. Hall, Com- 


1889-582 


48-1263 




missioner of Patents. 


L889-210 


L 14-2381 
115-248 




United States Rifle & Cartridge Co. and 


1877-197 


11-373 




Remington & Sons v. The Whitney 
Arms (5). 


1877-40 
1877-61 
1879-37 
1881-45 


83-157 




United States Repair & Guaranty Co. v. 

Assyrian Asphalt Co. 
United States Stamping Co. v. Jewett 


L902-576 

1880-704 
1880-507 


98-582 
18-1529 


35,66 


United States Stamping Co. v. King 


1880-607 
1880-704 


17-1400 




United States of America and The Willcox 


L882-445 


22-1366 




& Gibbs Sewing Machine Co. v. Marble 


1886-22 






Unswoth 


1879-69 


15-882 
30-1321 


29.41 


Untermeyer v. Freund 


1893-664 


65-1767 
79-2196 




Upton 


1884-26 


27-99 


93,94 




1888-136 
1890-3 
1890-93 
1891-^1 


83-743 
83-745 




Utley 


1892-38 


58-1091 


142 


Vaile 


1886-33 


37-563 


145 


Valiquet v. Johnson 


1900-132 


92-1795 


122, 126 


Valley v. Wurst 


1898-138 


84-985 
99-2967 




Van Atiken v. Osbom v. Harrison, Canfield . 




19-1584 


?6, 114, 


and Van Aulsen 






122 


Van Ausdal 


1900-74 


91-1617 
96-2409 


66 


Vanden Bergh & Company v. Belmont 


1902-179 


99-1624 




Destillery Company 








Van Depoel v. Daft 


1892-15 
1893-109 


58-520 


93 


Van Etten. 


11897-68 


80-1760 


l31 



154 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Van Matteson 


1883-52 
1891-39 
1891-192 
1892-231 

1892-175 
1901-161 

1903-317 
1902-172 

1884-207 

1890-11 

1893-21 

1903-318 
1898-122 

1882-103 

1885-16 
1889-207 

1870-84 
1870-«9 
1872-85 
1875-93 

1902-194 

1880-109 

1882-139 

1883-114 

1889-177 

1891-12 

1891-15 

1901-202 


24-389 

57-843 

60-893 
84-507 

97-957 
98-2175 
99-2320 
101-448 
105-262 

106-766 
99-1621 
99-2323 

27-621 

106-766 
84-808 
95-1248 

21-557 
78-1107 

30-1091 


41 


V»nness V Shettler 




Van Slvke 


81 


VaucHen 


171 


Vf»criard Dit Labonte 


41 


Verley 


66 


Vermont Farm Machine Co. v. Marble, 
Com. of Patents 

Verv 


41 


^^^y 

Vidal 




Vinton V Hamilton 




Voelker V.Gray V.Edison V. Bell; Edison 
V. Gray v. McDonough v. Bell; Edison 

V. Irwin v. Voelker 
Voelter 


93 
33 


Vo^el & Son 


99-2321 
100-451 
102-1293 
105-745 
108-291 

17-571 

23-269 

23-2233 

48-537 

85-1738 

97-1599 
114-259 
119-339 
111-1627 
120-325 




Von Alteneck v Thomoson et al 


122 


VonHeffner-Alteneck 


76 


VonHeffner-Alteneck 


101 


Von Welsbach and Luneren 


124 


Vose ' 


65 


Votey 


127 


Votev v Gallv 




122, 124 


Votev V Wuest v. Doman 


1904-323 


95, 122 







PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



155 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Vreeland v. Fessender v. Schloemitch. 



Vredand v. Fessenden v. Schloemitch. 

Vulte 

Wadsworth 



Wagenen 

Wagner 

Wagner Ex parte., 

Walker 



Walker... 

Walker v. Brunhoff 

Wallace 

Walpuski V. Jacobsen and Faber.. 
Walrath 



Walsh V. Hallbauer., 
Walsh V. Hallbauer. 



Walsh V. Shinn . 

Walter 

Walton 



Walton 

Walton V. Dennis . 



Ward- 



Ward.. 



Ward 

Wareham 

Wamant v. Wamant. 



Warner. 



189&-1 
1900-139 

1872-16 
1903-629 



1903-12 
1904-462 



1876-114 
1899-104 

1899-184 

1901-9 

1879-279 

1893-26 

1876-162 



1879-265 



1870-126 
1870-147 

1873-144 
1876-240 

1889-104 
1901-204 
1880-36 

1901-97 



117-2633 
119-1926 
120-659 
122-1046 

119-1259 
70-631 
92-1798 

109-1338 



106-1783 
118-1684 
llfM)65 
102-465 
102-466 
113-284 
118-2537 
118-1686 
9-964 

87-1397 
103-1679 

88-2409 
103-2171 

94r-223 
105-744 

16-1006 
62-1205 
10-166 
3^239 
105-746 

120-659 
16-959 
40-345 
40-346 



Warner V. Mead.. 



4-350 

46-1513 
97-1600 
17-265 

96-1238 
114-2381 
115-249 
115-1066 

J 122-2061 



122 



122 f^ 

175 

36 JS3 

37 
66 
69, 171 

66 

68 
37,94,124 
122, 145 
110, 140 



116 

119, 126 

37, 107 
145 

171 



190 
70.48 
46, 47, 
110, 122 



122 



156 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Warner V. Smith 


1898-517 


84-311 




I 


L898-213 


96-799 
86-800 
88-1706 
94-1188 
94-1970 
95-1648 
96-846 
100-2386 
105-975 
107-1660 
108-2144 
110-1723 
110-1724 
111-728 
112-955 
14-766 
21-1351 




Wamer v. Stimson 


1897-199 


78-1901 




Warren 


L901-137 


96-2410 
.01-1132 


171 






Warren 




20-2755 


133,134, 






171 


Warring 


L871-228 . 




88 


Washburn & Moen Mfg. Co. v. The Beat 


.892-299 


58-1555 




'Em All Barbed Wire Co. 


.896-105 


79-513 
80-654 
80-660 
86-800 




Washburn v. Hadfield 


891-234 


57-1719 






1892-89 


98-416 




Washburn v. Hadfield 


.892-89 


59-463 
95-2064 




Waterman 


1870-70 . 
1871-264 




37 






Waterman 


902-235 


00-233 


42,81 






00-2509 




Waterman v. Mackenzie 


891-320 


54-1562 
8^706 








14-2091 




Waters 1 


901-243 
875-59 


97-2744 6 
8-517 


5,66,213 


Waters, Farrington and Powell v. Yost ' 


122 


and Wallace 




40-345 
40-346 




Watson V. Thomas ] 


902-90 


98-2361 


154 


Watson V. Thomas 1 


903-370 ] 


06-1776 
18-590 


116 


Watson V. Thomas ^ 


904-587 1 


08-1590 

06-1776 

18-590 

[22-2066 





PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



157 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


Wattles 


1873-50 

1876-139 
187^222 

1896-49 
. 1897-165 

. 189&-126 

. 1902-93 
. 1902-457 


3-291 
6-837 

10-1 
97-1374 

76-1715 
81-967 

86-490 
86-1499 
113-548 

84-810 
86-2171 
9&-2362 
101-2570 
103-1154 
107-1659 
118-1683 
121-338 

117-1494 

103-223 

104-312 

. 111-809 


24 


Weaver 




Weaver 


170 


Weaver 


37,63 


Webb V. Levedahl 




Webber 


124 


Weber 


126 


Weber and Barry, Jr 


148- 


Weber v. Flather 


. 1903-70 
1903-561 


159 


Weber v.HaU 


126 


Webster 


. 1869-9 
1870-52 
1870-53 
1870-121 

. 1902-456 
. 1879-570 

. 1882-285 
1890-91 
1894-32 
1896-56 

. 1888-92 
1889-189 
1890-90 
1894-92 
1894-95 

. 1897-77 
. 1892-18£ 

. 1897-194 
. 1902-47S 


. 37 


Webster 


101-2570 
16-675 
21-2030 

21-2031 

80-360 

89-1144 

90-229 

97-1840 

99-1874 

44-567 

81-159 
60-1 19( 
83-743 
83-746 

81-2241 
95-185C 

101-310( 
. 118-22R 


30, 31 


Webster Loom Co. v. Higgins 




Webster Loom Co. v. Higgins 




Webster v. Sanford 


76 


Wedderbum etc 


22 


Weeden 




Weidemann 


48,96.171 

41,42,69 
3, 81, 83 


Wehner ■ 


Weihman 



158 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


RUEL 


Weil 


1898-612 

1871-244 . 
1902-483 

1884-388 

1892-57 

1892-225 

1901-183 

1904-281 

1872-185 
1875-187 


83-1802 
96-1037 




Weinberg 


79 


Weingarten Bix>s 


101-3108 
111-2494 

29-83 

97-1372 
101-1132 
113-1146 

111-810 
116-1732 

2-223 

151-1850 
113-2218 
86-1986 
92-1797 
88-2065 
43-753 

90-1947 

94-1577 

97-1837 

98-2586 

98-2585 

103-1913 

110-2235 

113-548 

69-121 
86-800 
3-440 
90-960 
97-2980 

83-595 
87-1784 

59-630 
118-1070 

17-512 
117-599 
117-600 
122-2062 
103-890 

10-546 
5-696 




Weir V Morden 




Weirick 


171 


Weissenthanner v. Goltstein 


122 


Weitling v. Cabell 


101 


Welch 


37 


Wellinfifton 


1904-564 
1899-62 

1899-176 
1888-36 
1890-6 
1891-33 

1900-35 

1894-510 

1873-21 
1900-227 

1898-436 

1892-95 


35 


Wellman 




Wellman and Wellman 


28 


Wells V. Boyle 




Wells V. Packer 


122 


Wells V. Re3molds 




Welpton 


93,94 


Welsbach Light Co. v. The American In- 
candescent Lamp Co. and Berlinicke 

Welsbach Light Co. v. The Stmlight In- 
candescent Gas Lamp Co. 

Wendell 


41,42 


Wender v. Horine 


127 


Wenzel 


1880-104 


41 


Wert 


37 


Wert V. Borst and Groscoo: 




126 


Wert V. McCaxTon, McCarron & McCanx>n.. . 
Wescott 


1903-114 
1869-206 
1874-58 


il54 
41 


Westenhaven & Adair 


41 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



159 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Western Electric Co. v. Sperry Electric Co.. . 

Westinghotase Electric & Mfg. Co. v. 
Trixmiph Electric Co. 

Westitiffliouse. Tr . v. Duncan . ; 


1893-573 
1900-219 
1894-170 

1891-110 

1901-290 

1871-68 

1871-232 

1871-233 

1902-20 

1876-416 

1876-224 
1877-42 

1898-177 

1887-88 

1878-110 

1879-170 

1883-12 

1890-39 
1893-87 

1873-101 

1869-43 

1870-12 

1870-50 

1870-122 

1871-144 

1889-38 


65-597 

86-489 

117-2086 

90-603 
105-2058 
116-1185 

66-1009 

83-1806 
84-983 
87-1399 
110-308 
111-732 
116-2258 
117-1496 

56^142 

97-1172 
97-1173 

94-1786 

97-1174 

111-2489 


79 


Wpst.incrhniisp v. Thomson 


-.!? 


Weston . 




Weston V Hunt and Turner 




Weston V. Jewell 


40-346 

98-417 
105-976 

84-1586 

87-181 
109-1068 

40-917 
106-764 

14-787 
89-1672 

16-360 
23-1031 

4-3 


93 


Weston V. White 




Wethey v. Roberts 




Wharton 


49 


Wheat 


110 


Wheat 


37 


Wheeler 


106, 109 


Wheeler and Wheeler 


89 


Wheeler v. Chenoweth & Murrill 






30-1092 





160 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Wheeler v. Peters. 



Wheeler, Jr., v. Rank 

Wheeler, Jr., v. Russell and Miller.. 

Wherry v. Heck 



Whieldonv. Tench. 
Whipple V. Miner.. . 



Whipple V. Sharp. 
Whipple V.Sharp. 



Whipple V. Sharp. 



White. 
White. 



White V. Demarest. 
White V. Dunbar. . . 



White V. Farmer 

White V. Hewitt and Nolen. 
White V. Purdy 



White V. Thompson . 



White V. Thomson 

Whitely, Bayley and Dyer . 

Whiteley 

Whiteley 



Whiteley and Gage 

Whitlock and Huson v. Scott. 



1870-141 
1871-144 
1873-170 
187^-28 

1870-119 

1870-145 

1872-32 

1875-113 

1878-32 

1889-201 

1903-309 
1883-303 

1901-133 

1902-2 

1902-5 

1902-5 
1902-2 

1871-304 
1902-70 



1887-133 

1886-494 
1895-39G 
1896-46 

1874-19 



94-584 



49-659 

106-1240 

106-763 

23-2236 

78-1741 

96-2229 

98-225 

109-1337 

112-254 

98-226 



98-1969 
99-1387 
100-685 
100-2177 

41-1161 
91-228 



1870-11^ 
1876-48 

1902-471 



1902-395 
1886-25 
1869-72 
1869-70 
1880-21'^ 

1869-53 
1869-72 

1902-16(. 



83-1802 
87-2121 
96-2579 

5-338 
115-1847 

37-1001 

101-2825 

101-1371 
36-1243 



184, 185 



28 

116 
94 



122 

108,111 

119 



79 



97, 129 



101-2823 
113-548 



110. 

17.113 

140 

124,133. 

145 

122 

85 

85 



122 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



161 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Whitney. , 



Whitney 

Whitney 

Whitney 

Whitney v. Gibson. 



Whittemore. 



Whittemore. 



Whyte.. 



Wiard 

Wick 

Wickers and Furlong v. Weinmann . 
Wicks and Wyman v. Knowles 



Wicks V. McAvoy. 
Wiedemann 



Wiegand., 



Wieser.. 



Wightman v. Rothenstein. 
Wilcomb V. Lasher 



Wilcomb V. Lasher. 



Wilcomb V. Lasher .^ . 

Wilcox 

Wilcox and Borton 



Wilcox V. Newton. 
Wilder 



189&-82 

1901-218 
1904-139 
1904-166 
1899-54 

1871-14 
1871-30 

1871-30 
1871-14 

1871-304 
1878-16 

1890-52 
/.. , 



1877-13 
1877-49 

1880-190 
1897-194 

1891-249 



1904-216 



1902-82 

1902-374 

1902-485 

1902-485 
1902-374 

1903-236 

1902-409 

1888-144 

1889-102 

1889-135 

1891-37 

1892-12 

1893-85 



Wildennann v. Simm. 



1871-125 
1871-^01 

1904-76 



83-1669 
84-1729 

97-2306 

109-2442 

110-603 

86-1983 

98-2362 



61-166 
117-902 
117-1797 

11-196 

18-869 

81-2246 

95-1853 

66-803 

80-1126 

84-147 

110-1726 
116-2532 
122-1046 

98-2172 
101-666 
109-1067 

101-3109 

106-743 
101-1829 
46-465 
83-593 
84-1281 
84-1282 
87-2069 
92-1236 
97-2305 

116-1462 



41,42 

77 

60,61 



79 

66,66.67 
20,68 
109, 124 
122 

142 



167 



66,68 



164 



4,164 

126, 213 
70 



109-276 



122 
37 

143 



1G3 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Wilkerson., 



Wilkin. 



Wilkins,.. . 
Wilkinson. 



Wilkinson v. Junggren. 



WUler.... 
Williams.. 

Williams.. 

Williams.. 
Williams. . 
Williams., 
Williams. 



Williams 

Williams 

Williams and Raidabaugh. 



1899-71 



1884-71 
1890-57 

1883-65 
1870-22 
1893-9 

1904-374 



1900-62 

1870-10€ 

1871-14^ 

1871-30! 

1872-46 

1890-30 

1876-225 

1892-23 

1892-21C 

1898-76 

1903-27£ 



1887-lOC 



Williams v. Liberman 1902-295 

Williams v. The Rome, Waterton & Ogdenji- 1879-423 

burg Ry. Co. 1880-630 

Williamson 1891-128 



Williamson 

Williamson 

Willets 

Willis v.McCoUin. 



1899-177 
1902-459 



Willson. 
Wilson . 



Wilson and Matthews v. Yakel and Rogers. 
Wilson V. Coon 



Wimmer. 



1887-213 
1892-111 
1893-57 



. 1876-145 
. 1881-12C 



87-513 

92-10361 

9S-633 

29-950 
24-1271 



112-252 
113-22151 
114-973 
115-803 

91-10331 



1-225 

10-748 

58-803 

61-423 

83-134e 

87-513 

105-17801 
116-298 
40-1337 

100-1332 
15-653 

56-1060 
92-1619 

88-206S 

101-2571 

115-106^ 

38-1017 

80-658 

59-1237 
88-1162 

63-465 
97-2534 

10-944 
19-482 
80-520 

11 5-1 58ft 



64 



122, 124 



68 



34 

37. 145 
79 
37, 133 



41,42 
135 

68, 139, 
140 
114 



139 

17 
41 
70.71 



46 



93,94,129 



68 



PRACTICE IN THE U, S. PATENT OFFICE 



163 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Winchester 


1880-92 


17-453 


68,67, 




1890-14 




134, 145 


Winslow 


1870-96 


9-795 


88 


Winslow V. Austin 


1899-301 


86-2171 
94-1186 
103-1684 
113-2218 
115-508 
119-1826 
120-2129 




Winsor v. Stouble 


1904-158 


110-600 


114, 119 


Winter v. Slick v. Volkommer 


1901-210 


97-1837 

99-1383 

101-2823 

109-1068 

109-2170 


122 


Winter v. Slick v. Volkommer 


1903-477 


107-1659 


126 


Wintherlick 


1879-171 

187(^-240 

1880-3 

1881-56 

1890-30 


16-404 


41 


Wintherlick 


1879-240 
187(^-171 
187(^-291 
1880-3 


16-808 


41 


Winton v. Jeff ery 


1904-386 


112-500 1 


il,22,154 


Wirt 




117-599 
11-417 


68 


Withinrton and Locke 


1877-27 


93, 94 


Witty and Caffrey 


1884r-68 


29-862 


60 


Wixford 




120-1166 


15 


Woerd v. Bacon 


1869-16 






1869-113 






Wolfender v. Price 


1898-87 


83-1801 
84-1729 
86-183 
86-1499 
86-1498 
87-180 
87-695 
87-696 
87-1607 
8(^-354 
95-233 
98-227 
104-580 
106-1777 
111-1628 




Wolfersperger and Moran ^ 


1904-514 


113-1418 


50 


WoUensak v. Reiher 


1885-310 


31-1301 






1885-314 


105-1260 





164 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


O. G. 


Rule 


WoUensak v. Reiher 


1886-314 
1885-310 
1892-4 
1893-72 

1880-106 
1904-167 

1873-39 


31-1303 
68-273 

17-1612 
110-600 
116-593 
3-239 

69-86 

17-463 
121-689 
106-2017 

63-1090 

68-1664 

60-1062 

91-1801 

97-2308 

104-1393 

86-490 

88-1704 

96-844 

110-602 

118-837 

118-1067 

3-621 

99-1622 
103-889 

16-216 

23-1330 
23-1331 




Woo4 


166 


Wood V. Eames 


126 


Wood V. Hinchmstn 




Wood V. Morris 


126, 127 


' Woodbury 


60 


Woodman 


1872-116 
1872-169 
1880-90 




Woodruff 


37, 133 


Woods 


171 


Woods V. Waddell 


1903-391 

1890-169 

1891-67 

1892-204 

1893-«7 

1893-100 

1894-2 

1892-62 

1892-179 

1900-77 

1903-106 
1898-13 

1872-264 
1873-101 
1902-176 

1879-129 
1880-167 

1870-60 

1876-217 

1877-32 

1877-16 
1899-153 


122, 126 


Woodward 


41,42,66, 


Woodward 


76 
76 


Woodward 


68,133 
78 


Woodward 


Woodward v. Kennedy 


113 


Woodward v. Newton 




Wooten 


89 


Worden 


41,42 


Workman v. McNaught 




Wright 


4 93 


Wright 

Wright and Bryant v. Reese 


10-587 

11-329 
88-1161 


86 

127,142 
153 
68,75,171 


Wright and Stebbins 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



165 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Wright and Stebbins v. Church 

Wright and Stebbins v. Hansen 


1898-173 


84-1585 
84-1586 

114-761 

119-2234 
122-1724 

44-943 
81-1932* 

53-603 

21-493 
93-752 

120-2441 

123-320 

79-335 

86-1326 
94-1188 
103-659 

79-337 

86-800 
87-1960 
87-2111 
88-1161 
94-986 
106-1778 
107-539 

59-1104 

103-657 

104-310 

110-2014 
114-2384 
120-2444 
123-2312 


116.128. 
145 


Wright and Taylor v. Bluthenthal and 
Bickart v. Mayor. Sons & Co. v. Cush- 
man & Co. 

Wright V. Daggett 




1888-116 
1891-172 

1890-507 
1891-25 

1882-94 
1892-78 




Wrieht V. Postel 




Wright V. Randel 




Wurtz 


199 


Wurtz 




6, 7, 25 


Wurtz V. Harrington i 

Wurtz V. Harrinerton 


1897-20 
1897-359 

1892-108 

1903-95 

1903-556 

1869-110 

1870-70 

1871-182 

1871-210 

1872-244 

1873-33 

1873-96 

1875-61 

1875-106 

1876-30 

1885-27 




Wyckoff 


179 


Wvman v. Donnellv 


159 


Wvman v. Donnellv 


159 


Yale 




Yale Cigar Mfg. Co., Ltd. v. Yale 


41-471 
88-545 
88-547 

30-1183 
86-1804 









166 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



TITLE 


CD. 


0. G. 


Rule 


Yale Lock Mfg. Co. v. The Berkshire 


1890-r347 


51-2191 




National Bank; The Berkshire National 


1896-69 






Bank v. The Yale Lock Mfg. Co. 








Yamall v. Pope. 




115-2136 
74-1732 


122, 126 


Yates V. Huson 


189fr-278 




• 




8&^1706 
106-2015 
109-809 
114^766 
114-2384 




Yerdon : 


1892-411 


101-1830 


77 


Yost V. Heston 


1871-226 . 
1875-124 




126 


Young 


8-643 


135 


Young 


1885-108 


33-1390 


41 




1887-115 
1890-24 
1890-183 
1891-199 


88-546 




Young 


1889-116 

1890-165 
1890-166 
1892-214 


46-1635 


37 


Young V. Donnelly 


1898-20 


82-1417 




- 




83-1992 

92-1235 

103-1684 




Young V. Eick 


1904-465 


113-547 


153 


Young V. Hoard 


1870-59 . 




76, 126 


1880-69 






Young V. Rogsre 


1880-178 


18-733 


110 


Zabel 


1888-35 


43-627 






1890-184 


91-2372 
105-1261 
108-1588 




Zacharias 


1902-80 


98-2171 


50 


Zay 


1881-20 


19-1496 


93,94 


*^'*j • • 

Zeidler v. Leech 


1891-9 


54-503 

83-805 
86-184 
86-491 




Zeitinger V. Reynolds v. Mclntire 


1891-212 


57-1279 






1894-3 
1894-14 


83-746 




Zimmermann v. Zamboni 




121-2326 
58-803 


124 


Zipemowsky v. Edison 


1892-23 


171 



PRACTICE IN THE U. S. PATENT OFFICE 



167 



TITLE 



CD. 



O. G. 



Rule 



Zuber. 



Zwiebel 

Zwietusch v. Stockheim. 



Zwietusch v. Wittermann . 



1894-47 
1896-33 
1896-34 



1904-19S 
1890-151 

1896^8 



67- 
81-2084 
82-894 
82-895 
91-161(1 
97-551 
104-1655 

110-1428 

53-755 

112-732 

75-183 

99-2549 

103-1679 



64,65,66, 
77 



71