Google
This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on Hbrary shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other maiginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we liave taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain fivm automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attributionTht GoogXt "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liabili^ can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at |http : //books . google . com/|
i
l^arbarti College libtavs
1
FROM THE GIFT OF
1
WILLIAM ENDICOTT, jR.
(Out of in?)
OF BOSTON
h
)
PROCEEDINGS
OF TBB
CLIFTON ANTIQUARIAN CLUB
FOR 1884-88.
PEOOEEDINGS
OF THE
Clifton Antiquarian Club
FOR 1884-88.
VOL. I.
EDITED BY
ALFRED E. HUDD, F.S.A.,
Hon. Secretary,
LP?
Priitted for the Club by J. WEIGHT & C0.» Stone Bbidge.
1988.
^y^ V\sZ
NOV 17 1921 ^^
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
PAGE
PiBST Meeting, Rules, &c. ------ 1-3
Anglo-Nobman Doobways. By John Taylob, Bristol City Librarian 4-11
On the Ck>N8TBUCT0BS OF Stanton Dbew Cibcles, Maes Knoll
Gamp, and the Wansdykb. By John Beddoe, M.D., P.R.S., Ac. 12-13
The Megalithic Remains at Stanton Dbew. By the Rev. H. T.
Pebpect, M.A. - • - - • - - 14-17
On some Abchitbctubal Remains of Deebhubst Pbioby Chubch.
By Thomas S, Pope, Architect ----- 18-21
Notes on the Eably Histoby of Deebhubst. By the Rev. Geobge
BUTTEBWOBTH, M.A. ------- 22-26
The Saxon Chapel Recently Discovebed at Deebhubst. By
Alfbed E. Hudd, F.S.A. .-.-.. 27-32
On Old Cabved Chests. By Thomas S. Pope, Architect • - 33-38
Medlsval Abmoub. By Lieut.-Col. J. R. Bbamble, F.S.A., Hon.
Treasurer -------- 39-50
Ancient Bbistol Documents. No. I. Bristol Local Act of Parlia-
ment passed during the Protectorate, for Levying Rates for main-
tenance of Ministers, and granting St. Ewen's Church for a Public
Library. With Notes. Communicated by Lieut.-Col. J. R.
Bbamble, F.S.A. ....... 61-57
On the Roman Road between Bath and Caebwent. By Alfbed
T. Mabtin, M.A. .----.. 58-66
Pbogeedinos of the Club, 1884-85 . - . . . 67-83
Old Ibon-Wobk in the West of England. By Thomas S. Pope,
Architect ........ 85-91
On an Ancient Cope at Yatton, Somebset. By Lieut.-Col. J. R.
Bbamble, F.S.A. ...-.-. 92-95
Cubiosities of Pabish Registebs. By John Taylob, Bristol City
Librarian ...----- 96-103
The Human Remains fbom the Stonby Littleton Long Babbow.
By John Beddoe, M.D., F.R.S., &o. - - - - 104-108
On a Romano-Bbitish Intebment Discovebed at Fabmbobough,
Somebset. By Alfbed E. Hudd, F.S.A., Hon. Sec. - - 109-113
Notes on Ancient Nobwegian Wooden Chubches, with notices of
similar early structures in Qreat Britain and Ireland. By Fbancis
Fox TucKETT, F.R.G.S. ..--.. 114-129
Recent Excavations at Silbuby Hill. By Alfbed C. Pass - 130*135
Ancient Bbistol Documents. No. II. A curious Deed belonging
to the Parish of St. Mary-le-Port. With Notes, and - - 136-141
No. III. From the records of St. Nicholas Church. With Notes.
Communicated by Lieut.-Col. J. R. Bbamble, F.S.A. - - 142-150
Ancient Bbistol Documents. No. IV. On some Old Deeds belonging
to the Church of St. Thomas, Bristol. With Notes. Communicated
by the Rev. Chas. S. Taylob, Vicar ----- 151-155
Pboceedings of the Club, 1886 --*.•• 156-168
VI
CONTENTS.
Ancient Bqistol Documents. No. V. From the Beoords of St. Mary-
le-Port. With Notes. Communicated by Lieut. -Col. J. R.Bbamble,
P.S.A., V.P.
Notes on Old Bristol Houses. By Thomas S. Pope, Aichiteot
Cheddab Ghubch, Somersetshire. By the Rev. J. Coleman, M.A.,
Vicar ---------
The Church op St. Mary the Virgin, Wedmore. By Lieut. -Col.
J. R. Bramble, F.S.A., V.P. - . -
Ancient Bristol Documents. No. VI. Regulations of the Vestry of
St. Thomas in 1563. Communicated by the Rev. C. S. Taylor,
Vicar. With Notes. No. VII., Regulations of the Vestry of St.
Stephen in 1524. Communicated by Alderman F. F. Fox. With
Notes by the Rev. C. S. Taylor, M.A. . - - -
On Some Optical Peculiarities op Ancient Painted Glass. By
Francis F. Tuckett, F.R.G.S. -----
The Commerce op Bristol in the 14th and 15th Centuries. By
John Latimer- -------
A Descriptive Catalogue op some Remarkable Copes. By the
Hon. and Rev. Walter I. Clifford, S.J. -
Appendix. Notes on the Stitches employed in the Embroidery of the
Copes. By Mrs. M. E. Baqnall-Oakeley - - - -
The Misereres in Bristol Cathedral. By Robert Hall Warren
Notes on the 18th Century Lady Chapel op Bristol Cathedral.
By Thomas S. Pope, Architect . - - - -
Th3 Hospital op St. Katherine, Brightbow, Bedminster. By
Alfred E. Hudd, F.S.A., Hon. Sec. . - - -
Proceedings op the Club, 1887-88 - - - - -
Index, Societies, Members, Rules, &c. . - . -
page
169-171
172-174
175-177
178-192
193-206
207-216
217-228
229-238
238-240
241-250
251-256
257-276
277-296
297-304
LIST OF ILLUSTHATIONS.
PLATE
</ I. — Double Triangular-headed Saxon Window at Deerhurst, with details.
From a drawing by J. G. Buckler, Architect,
yil. — The Saxon Chapel at Deerhurst, Plan, Chancel-arch, Window, North
Door, Dedication Stone, Impost of Arch, &c.
"^III. — Old Carved Chests at Deerhurst, Mark, and Lechlade.
V IV. — Ditto, at Chippenham Church.
^ V. — Ditto, from Highworth, Lyme Begis, Ac.
/ VI. — Illustrations of MedisBval Armour, from Monumental Brasses at Trump-
ington (A.D. 1280) ; Stoke d'Abemoun (1327) ; Strensham (c. 1390) ;
Cheddar (1442); Cirencester (1462); Hutton (1496); ChurchUl (1672).
•'VII. — Plan of the Koman Station at Sea Mills, reduced from the Ordnance
Map. Plan of Abona (Sea Mills), from Seyer*s, Bristol,
yVIll, — Long Ashton Church, N.E., and Tithe Bam; from drawings by Mr.
Roland W. Paul.
^ IX. — Stanton Drew, Parsonage, and Old Bridge; and "Church House,"
Chew Magna ; from drawings by Mr. R. W. Paul.
v^ X. — Stanton Drew, Church, West ; ditto, N.E. ; Plan, and Font.
\ Old Iron- work at, 1, Wedmore ; 2, Cirencester ; 3, Huntspill ; 4, Hawks-
bury ; 5, Moorlinch ; 6, Portishoad ; 7 and 10, Portbury ; 8, Little
^Xl, Sodbury; 9, East Brent; 11, Lyme Regis; 12, Westonzoyland ;
/ Xn. V 13, Whitchurch : 14, Berkeley ; 15, Cromhall ; 16, Cromhall ; 17,
/XIII. Axmouth ; 18, Langley Burrell ; 20, Christ Church, Bristol ; 21, St.
John's, Bristol ; 22, Kempsford ; 24, Somerford Keynes ; 24,
Inglesham.
/XIV. — Norwegian Wooden Churches. Church of Borgund, Laerdal; Church
of Hitterdal, Thelemarken ; and Plan. Church of Umaes, Sognef jord.
yXV. — ^Details of Wood Carving from the Churches of Urnaes, Borgund, and
Hitterdal, Norway.
y XVI.— Plan of Recent Excavations at Silbury Hill (1886).
y XVII.— Sections of ditto. Worked Flint found in Shaft No. 6.
y XVHL— Old Woodwork in a Cellar, 43, High Street, Bristol ; 2, Angle-post, St.
Peter's Street ; 3, Norman Pillar in Nelson Street : 4, Crypt, 22,
High Street. From drawings by T. S. Pope, Architect.
/ XIX. \
'I Scenes from the History of Reynard the Fox, from the Miserere
/ mcj ( Carvings in Bristol Cathedral.
y XXII.— Remains of Norman South Aisle of St. Augustine's Abbey Church.
Drawn, from a Photograph taken during the building of the New
Nave of Bristol Cathedral, by Mr. Roland W. Paul.
^ XXIII. — St. Eatherine's Hospital, Bedminster. 1, '* The Guest House," S. side,
from a Drawing by the Rev. J. Qbaitt ; 2, Ground Plan ; 8, 15th
Century Capital, from a Drawing by Mr. Pope; 4, The Guest
HousC) N. side, from a Drawing by Rev. E. Leslie.
EREATA.
On p. 35, 1. 7, for Sittem read Sitten.
„ p. 64, 1. 3 from bottom, fonr Westward read Eastward.
„ p. 127, last line, for St. Wodlas read St. Woolas.
„ p. 136, 1. 6, for 1885 read 1884.
„ p. 149, 1; 6, /or Planyrs read Flauyrs (flowers).
p. 166, 1. 8 from bottom, the inscription on the seal of Bruton school reads —
The Sealle of the Skolle of Bbew, in Latin capitals, not Old English,
as printed.
tf
^roreetrfngsf of tf)t
Clifton ^ntiqnnvinn Clitli,
1884—5.
FIRST MEETING.
On January 23rd, 1884, a meeting took place at the Bristol
Museum and Library, which was attended by the following gentle-
men: The Hon. and Bight Rev. Bishop CliflFord, Rev.B. H. Blacker,
Lieut-Col. J. R. Bramble, Dr. G. F. Burder, Dr. A. Steven, Messrs.
J. Bush, J. Dallas, F. J. Fry, W. V. Gough, H. M. Herapath, Alfred
E. Hudd, W. P. Hudden, Christopher James, W. E. Jones, T.
Kerslake, Harold Lewis, A. T. Martin, T. S. Pope, P. D. Prankerd,
S. H. Swayne, John Taylor, William Thomas, and John Williams.
Bishop Clifford having been requested to take the chair, called
upon Mr. A. K Hudd to read a circular letter which had been
printed and circulated amongst archaeologists residing in Clifton
and the neighbourhood. In this letter, which was signed by Bishop
Clifford, Col. Bramble, Messrs. J. Bush, A. E. Hudd, T. Kerslake,
A. C. Pass, J. Taylor, and J. Williams, it was proposed to form
a small Society, having its head-quarters in Clifton, and consisting
of a limited number of members, which, without interfering with
other societies in the West of England having somewhat similar
objects, might arrange meetings and excursions for the study and
investigation of objects of archaeological interest in the West of
England and South Wales. This circular having been re-ad, letters
approving of the objects of the proposed Club, and expressing
regret at being unable to attend the meeting were read from the
Rev. C. S. Taylor, Lieut.-Col. Macliver, Dr. Langley, Professor
1
2 Clifton Antiqtuirian Cltib.
John Rowley, Alderman F. F. Fox, and Messrs. W. Adlam, F.S.A.,
W. Edkins, J. Reynolds, C. J. Trusted, and A. C. Pass.
On the motion of the chairman it was then unanimously re-
solved by those present at the meeting '' That a society to be called
' The Clifton Antiquarian Club ' be hereby formed, to consist of
forty membera"
The first forty members of the Club having been elected by the
meeting, the following rules, which had been prepared by a pro-
visional committee, were read and adopted : —
1. — ^The Society shall be called the "Clifton Antiquarian
Club."
2. — The chief object of the Club shall be the investigation of
antiquities, especially of those in the surrounding cQuntry.
3. — The Club shall consist of not more than forty Ordinary and
ten Honorary Members.
4. — The Officers of the Club shall be — a President, two Vice-
Presidents, a Treasurer, and a Secretary, all of whom shall be elected
annually from amongst the Ordinary Members.
5. — The affairs of the Club shall be managed by a Committee,
consisting of the Officers and four Members to be elected annually;
three to form a quorum.
6. — Ordinary Members shall be elected at the Annual Meeting,
by ballot. Candidates must be previously nominated in writing by
two Members, and approved by the Committee : the names of all
candidates must be sent to every Member at least seven days before
the Annual Meeting. One adverse vote in ten shall be sufficient
to exclude.
7. — Honorary Members shall be elected by the unanimous vote
of the Committee.
8. — The Committee shall have the power of inviting not more
than five gentlemen to attend any meeting of the Club.
9. — ^There shall each year be two excursions, and two meetings
for general purposes, one of which — to be held in January — ^shall
be the Annual Meeting for the election of new Members and the
appointment of Officera At least seven days' notice of all meet-
ings shall be given to every Member by the Secretary.
10. — Special Meetings may be called by the Committee. The
Secretary shall call a Special Meeting within ten days of receiving
a written request to that effect, specifying the object of the meet-
ing, and signed by not less than ten membera
Rules. 3
11. — Each Member shall give three days' notice to the Secretary
of his intention to join the excursion meetings, and he shall be at
liberty to introduce a lady, subject to the same rule as regards the
notice. The expenses of each excursion shall be defrayed by those
who attend it, or who have signified their intention to do so to the
Secretary.
12. — Each Ordinary Member shall pay an Annual Subscription
of Seven Shillings and Sixpence, which shall become due on the
first day of January in each year, and shall be paid in advance.
13. — Members whose subscriptions are in arrear for one year
shall be considered as having withdrawn from the Club, if after
application the same be not paid.
14. — ^Any Member being absent from four consecutive meetings,
without explaining the cause of his absence to the satisfaction of
the Committee, shall be considered to have retired firom the
Club.
15. — All matters not included in the foregoing Rules shall be
settled .by a majority of two-thirds of the Committee, provided
that any Member may appeal from their decision to a General
Meeting of the Club, at which the votes shall be taken by
ballot
The Meeting then proceeded to elect the Officers and Committee
for the year 1884, the following being the result :
President : The Hon. and Right Rev. Bishop Clifford.
Vice-Presidents: John Reynolds; Alderman Francis F. Fox.
Treasurer : Lieut-CoL James R. Bramble.
Secretary : Alfred E. Hudd.
Ccymmittee: Q. F. Burder, M.D., Francis J. Fry, W. E. Jones,
Alfred C* Pass.
Hon. Members: General John de Havilland, F.S.A., York
Herald; John Beddoe, M.D., F.RS.
(Elected Hon. Members of the Clab at the first meeting of the Committee.)
The President then called upon Mr. John Taylor, to read a
paper he had prepared for the meeting upon "Anglo-Norman
Church Doorways," which is here printed A discussion followed
upon the interesting subject of the lecture, and will be found
printed in a later portion of this volume.
Clifton Antiquarian Chib.
^njjlo^^orman CftwrtJ 38oorbjap««
By JOHN TAYLOR, Bristol City Librarian.
{Read January 23r</, 1884.;
In his novel " He Knew he was Right," Mr. Anthony TroUope
represents a gallant colonel, one of the leading characters of the
fiction, as blinding the real object of his visit to a country village,
by giving out that he is attracted to the place by curiosity to see
a remarkable doorway to an ancient church, the living of which ia
held by a college friend. The reader is aware, from the general
character of the man in question, that the church, apart from
more tender attractions, would hardly have drawn him from Pall
Mall ; but in these days of attention to architectural antiquities, the
pretence would not be a particularly weak one. We confess to
have ourselves gone many a mile to inspect a church porch, and
have not always regretted the journey. We had a friend whose
delight it was to collect engravings and photographs of Romanesque
doorways of churches, and who was as proud of his collection of
chevron and medallion moulded arches, whether derived from
some stately cathedral, or from some demure village sanctuary, as
any gatherer of postage stamps or book plates of his display of
royal or presidential heads and armorial devices, and with, perhaps,
more reason. Even apart from the artistic merit of the carved
work, such a collection might call up a host of impressive relations
with the past. Each church, of which some sculptured arch
was the exponent, not only presented some distinct points of
architectural interest, some special picturesqueness of form, group-
ing, or situation, but besides embodying the pious fervgur of long
generations of worshippers who sung their praises with a merry
noise while stirring events were happening in the land, was
connected with a thousand weddings, baptisms and burials, and
with many interesting local incidents and customs, as its vestry
records would show ; while there were the historical associations
Anglo-Norman Doorways. 5
with the momumental tombs within the sacred walls, and the
touching memories of the humbler graves without. A church
door at the present day is too often intended as much to
exclude as to admit worshippers, being more persistently shut
than open, and any thought beyond a protective purpose in
its connection would be accounted superstition. In the earlier
ages of the Faith, it was not likely that the many Scriptural
allusions to the doors of the Temple, whether of spiritual or of
literal reference, would fail to find symbolical expression in the
architectural arrangements of the Church. When Christ Himself
says " I am the door," the material symbol would inevitably be
magnified in order to recall to His followers the adorable presence
of the divine founder of their religion, while the encouragement to
do so would be increased by the other instances of typology which
run through the Scriptures, from Jacob's vision of angels at BetheL
whose bright sanctities made him exclaim " This is the very gate
of Heaven," to St John's vision at Patmos, where the twelve angel-
guarded gates of the Church triumphant are said to be each of
one pearl. In the affectionate outflow which such imagery elicited,
an endeavour would be made to realize to transcendental view
by art presentment and costly workmanship, a feature of
such spiritual meaning as the Divine portal, Christ Himself,
through which the believer must enter to the religious life upon
earth, and to the rewards of that life in the celestial city " with
all its spirea" The folding doors of Solomon's Temple were of fir
tree, and carved with cherubim and palm trees, and open flowers
" covered with gold fitted upon the carved work," The royal gates,
as the western doors of the Christian Basilica were called, were
in an instance related by Anastatius, covered by Pope Honorias I.
(A.D. 626-638) with silver, between the narthex or outer portico
and the nave. The door also of the anastasis or screen that
corresponds with the altar rails of the Gothic church, was also covered
with silver. At the entrance of the Temple was a fountain which
represented the water of regeneration. " Hither he hath brought,"
says Eusebius, " pledges of holy purgations, to wit, fountains lying
over against the Temple, which with great plenty gave means of
washing unto such as enter the hallowed cloisters." The custom
of ablution before prayers was abandoned by the Eastern Christians
because they did not care to continue a practice in common with
the Mussulmans who also, as readers of the Vision of Mirza are
6 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
aware, used to bathe before offering their deyotions. The western
Church concluded that plunging at all seasons into cold water was
not good for the health : and moreover the fountains were some-
times frozen. The custom was therefore commuted into sprinkling,
and the baptismal new-birth became symbolized under that form,
a reminiscence of the completer ablution being jet afforded by the
holy water stoups at the entrance of the pre-Reformation Churches
of England, and of course in all Roman CathoUc Churches of the
present day. The barbaric enrichment by the use of the precious
metals was afterwards exchanged for the more precious employment
of thought in the execution ; and as there was no aptitude in the
door itself for architectural treatment^ the ornamentation of its stone
frame-work by sculptured fancies became instead the work of the
artist The recollection of the importance of the Basilican portals, of
which the most conspicuous example is that of St Sophia with its
outer and inner narthex, marble doorways, and fourteen bronze
doors, is better preserved in the great continental churches than in
the English, which latter are usually but subordinate features in
the general design of the building. There are of course noble ex-
ceptions to this remark among mediasval English doorways, some
of which will by-and-bye call for attention.
In the adaptation of the basilican arrangements, as comprised in
early Romanesque, or as M. de Caumont calls it primitif
romane, which extended from the fifth to the tenth centuries
inclusive, the head of the doorway was a simple round arch with a
tympanum wrought in mosaic as in the Church of St Pieire
at Vienna, where the ornament is a group of variegated bricks
between two triangular figures. The rude doorway of the old
English church and the stately and finished Norman portal both
look back to the same parentage and are collaterally but in-
dependently derived finom the Roman arch. The lingering tradition
of classical construction is well exampled at Sompting in Sussex,
where the volutes and scrolls of Corinthian capitals are partially
reproduced The uncouth old English or Anglo-Saxon arch has
its own charm, and is a romance in stone that recalls the memory
of the fierce days when the Faith in England had to fight for
existence with as many outward foes as Bunyan's pilgrim in his
day with spiritual enemie& The western porch at Monkwearmouth
is almost sublime in its rugged simplicity. Notwithstanding the
Church was wasted by the Danes in 868, enough of its structure
Anglo-Norman Doorways. 7
remains to enable us to realise the presence of the fervid Benedict
Biscop who founded the monastery there in 674, and was buried
within the eastern porch sixteen years after. Benedict was a
thane of Eg&id, son of Oswig, the first of the kings of North-
umberland after the union of the provinces of Deira and Bemicia
into one monarchy. Having become a monk he made religious
visits to Rome, and at one time brought back with him John, the
arch-chanter of St. Peter's, who was allowed by Pope Agatho to
come to Britain. Besides teaching Bede how to chant the psalms
after the Roman manner, the Pope's singer filled the little church
at Monkwearmouth with devout listeners to his solemn tunes, and
we may yet see the very doorway through which they passed with
Bede himsel£ Ita ponderous arch springs from massive abaci
supported on either side by two stout piers or baluster shafts,
which jointly are equal in thickness to the wall of the church.
These again stand upon a sort of second impost which rests on a
jamb curiously sculptured with entwined serpents, a reminiscence
of the mysterious ophite worship. " This is decidedly," says Sir
Gilbert Scott, "the most remarkable doorway of its kind yet
known." The English doorway was contemptuously thrust aside
by the Norman workmaster, who brought the round arch to such
elaborate finish and durable grandeur that his doorways with their
receding semicircles begot the reverence of the church builders of
aft;er time, who in numberless instances in spite of a want of
harmony with pointed styles affectionately enshrined them in their
own structures. As in later day the church artist poured his
religious feeling into the coloured panes, the Norman carver
delighted to honour the doorway with the richest labour of his
hands, and after that the chancel arch. In the first half of
the eleventh century, indeed, he showed little more art workman-
ship than the Saxon. His arch was set flush with the wall, while
its plain surface was hacked into concentric bands of stellated
ornament, or into indented squares technically known as hatched
mouldings, of which there are examples in Westminster Hall.
This kind of marquetry in later time was more carefully done,
while the tympanum of the doorway was sculptured with figures
of men and animals, though in most cases of a deplorably rude
kind. It is not until the first half of the twelfth centuiy that we
find such bold and vigorous and fondly executed work as the portal
of Dunstable Priory term/p. Henry I. (AD. 1181), the sculpture of
§ Clifton Antiquarian Club.
which gives as much character to the facade as an illuminated
capital to the page of a missal. Recessed in five orders the
mouldings, which are carried down the jamb, consist, the outer
one of zigzag, the second and third of angels or other carved figures
entwined in ovals of waving tendrils, the fourth of zodiacal signs,
which was a favourite device, and other basso relievos, and the
fifth or inner moulding of flowers, etc., in high alto relievo. We
cannot view this sadly decayed porch without thinking of the
December night of 1290 when the body of Queen Eleanor was
brought into the church, the bier having previously rested in the
Market Place where the Chancellor and nobles marked out a spot
for a lofby cross which was afterwards erected by the king.
It might be thought that the lavish ornamentation and dignified
repose of the advanced Norman arch were emblematic of the se-
curity of times when men could build at leisure and unmolested ;
but the finest examples of its kind refer to the days of Stephen
and Henry II., which were full of the confused noise of battles and
sieges, both at home and in France as well as in Wales, Scotland,
and Ireland. The Sagittarius who figures among the carvings of
arches, such as at Kilpeck, near Hereford, is believed to indicate
work of the time of Stephen, and may well suggest the character of
his militant reign.
Mr. Ruskin reasonably fears that the seemingly unmeaning billet
or zigzag moulding of the round arch will involve the ornamentation
of Romanesque architecture in the charge of belonging to that kind
of art, which followed for its own sake and being unimitative of
outward nature, but derived from the fallen and unregenerate nature
of the workman, degrades the morals and intellectual powers of the
artist Curiously enough he had been anticipated in this idea,
though none would accuse him of having derived it fix)m the boy poet
Chatterton. " Take a walk to College Green," says the latter, re-
ferring to the noble gateway of St. Augustine's in his native city,
*' view the labyrinth of knots which burst around that mutilated
piece, trace the windings of one of the pillars, and tell me if you
do not think a great genius lost in these minutiae of ornament."
For such lost spirits of self-created architectural design we must
look rather to India, where the subtle arabesque enrichment so
luxuriantly exampled by the art of that country, which never, Mr.
Ruskin asserts, represents a natural fact, but being generated from
the artist's own evil imagination is expressive of all that in him is
Anglo-Norman Doorways. 9
soft, self-indulgeDt, voluptuous, weak, debased, and superstitious.
" It (Indian art) will not draw a man, but an eight-armed monster ;
it will not draw a flower, but only a spiral or zigzag." A spiral or
zigzag is just what the Norman carver executed, and yet Mr-i
Buskin is loath to admit that he worked only from a corrupt heart
and evil fancy ; a conclusion in which it is easy to agree, though
his mouldings seem to come under the same condemnation as the
work of the Eastern designer. Were it necessary by the way to
defend the Indian artist, we might point to Mr. Birdwood's
Indvstrial Art of Indiaj and even to Mr. Ferguson's Indian
Temples, for sufficient evidence that his art was not all self-
evolved, but that often there was a loving appreciation of external
nature, the floral ornamentation especially beiug at times almost
pre-Baphaelite in its honesty, while the human figure with a simple
duality of arms may constantly be seen, though in hardly so
emaciated condition as in Christian art. Mr. Buskin's apology
for Norman arabesque is found in the fact that it was wrought by
** persons practised in carving men, monsters, wild animals, birds
and flowers in overwhelming redundance." With some limitation
perhaps as to redundance, the same excuse applies to Indian art,
which, however, in accordance with a different theology developed
into other forms than those of Bomanesque. The latter gained " in
truth, and therefore in grace, until just at the moment of transition
into the pointed style you have the consummate type of the
sculpture of the school given you in the west front of the Cathedral
of Chartres." That fa9ade is undoubtedly one of the most splendid
results of the style of the first half of the 12th century ; the door-
ways being thought by Sir G. Scott to " be probably the finest
remaining of the transitional period " ; it being as he remarks a
characteristic of French art to lavish all the resources of decorative
inventiveness upon the portals. Such exquisite work in combining
human figures with the aspiring foliage and diapered ornament
conveys its own apology for existence ; but it may be admitted
that a hardly less noble example is to be found in the north-west
doorway of Lincoln Cathedral, though the enrichment is simply
arabesque or rather Byzantine, the Corinthian capitals of the
columns, however, being hardly in harmony with the chevron and
other mouldings, with which they are related. If Lincoln be re-
ceived to favour there can be no difficulty in pleading for the style
in general. Not indeed that sculptured mouldings are necessary
lo Clifton Antiquarian Club.
to produce the finest effects of the Norman arch. If simplicity and
dignity compose the sublime in writing, sublimity in architecture
results firom the like combination. There can be no better English
example of this remark than the western front of Tewkesbury
Abbey, where six slender receding columns bound up to support
an equally receding arch, whose apex is no less than 65 feet from
the ground. In the composition there is nothing smaU, mean,
or trivial; but without any parade of ornament there is an
effect like that of some lofty cli£^ whose " high and bending
head looks dreadful down," the loftiness in both cases being the
cause of the impression. In the stately arch of Tewkesbury
ornament is no more required than in the overhanging crag in
order to excite awe and admiration ; but when as at Malmesbuiy
the elevation is unimposing, there is need to awaken the attention
by art device. Like the rock-cut temples of the East, the caver-
nous south porch of Malmesbury, exuberantly enriched both
within and without, derives its effect finom art treatment A
bold, plain-moulded exterior arch enshrines a series of carved
mouldings of eight orders which recede and diminish till the deep
interior is reached. Within the porch we find a Norman arcade
with chevron moulded heads, above which on either side is a mass
of barbaric sculpture in keeping with the even more rudely em-
bellished archway which forms the immediate entrance to the
church. This is perhaps the most elaborate example of a Norman
entrance in England, though other noble illustrations of the kind
are abundant The lavish decoration of Adel Church, near Leeds,
has given the late vicar of that church a fine opportunity of in-
dulging his fancy for symbolic interpretation. In his Archceologia
Adelenaie he finds that the seven receding arches of the doorway
are the " rainbow round the throne like unto an emerald," and are
in some way related to the seven lamps of fire burning before the
same exalted seat, which ** are the seven spirits of God " ; the zig-
zag or other indented mouldings giving the idea of brilliancy,
while a plain moulding contained in the composition is the sim-
plicity of the gospel of Christ Where subtle parables are, there
is the subtle vicar, who is no doubt right in interpreting the figures
of the bull and the eagle, the lion and the human face beneath the
pediment of the porch to be the symbols of the four evangeUsta
But when he discovers the patriarchal covenant, the law and the
prophets, the four rivers of paradise, the four gospels, the rose of
Anglo-Norman Doorways. ii
Sharon, the devU, emblems of Persian fire worship, with significa-
tions of blessedness, peace, hope and faith, and charity of the bond
of matrimony, of the bond and the unity of the church of brotherly
love, and union expressed in certain straight or intertwisted lives,
we hesitate to proceed, and rather believe that the interpreter's
judgment is overmastered by his imagination.
Note.— Illustrations of some of the Doorways, &o., mentioned in Mr. Taylor's
paper, may be found in the following worKS : —
Sompting Church, Norman capitals, " Archsdological Journal," vol. I., p. 34.
Monksveannouth Church, W. door, Bloxam's ''Gothic Architecture," 11th ed.
V. II. p. 1.
Ettpeck Church. Lewis's << Illustrations of Kilpeck," plates 13, 15, 21.
St. Augustine's Gateway, Bristol. Seyer's *' Bristol," vol. II. p. 215 ; and
*' Arohaeologia," vol. XVI, plate 65.
Chartres Cathedral. Nesfield's « Specimens," plates 21, 23, 24, &c.
Lincoln Cathedral Winkle's '< Cathedrals," voL IL, plate 56.
Tewkesbury Abbey. Lysons* « Gloucestershire Antiquities," plate 70. '< The
Builder," Jan. 3rd, 1885.
Malmesbury Abbey, Porch. Knight's << Old England," fig. 1038.
Some fine specimens of Norman doorways in Gloucestershire churches are figured
by Lysons, plates 8, 36, 38, 44 ; and by Mr. J. P. Moore in his recently
published *' Architectural Sketches."
A« E. H.
12 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
iletnarto on i\it
Constructors; of Stanton Breb) Ctrcleoi.
iHaes Unoll Camp antv tfie WB^n^^^t.
By JOHK BEDDOE, M.D., F.R.S.
[Read at Stanton Drew, May 2Sth, 1884.)
I SHOULD ascribe the circles at Stanton Drew, and the other
megalithic remains in that neighbourhood, to the neolithic race,
some of whom were buried in the long barrows and chambered
tumuli of our own and other countries, from Barbary to Scotland
inclusive. This race seems to have been almost uniformly long-
headed, well-featured, but of rather small stature and physical
development It is probably represented now-a-days, in more or
less purity, by the Berbers, the Basques, and some of the
Spaniards, and by the well proportioned handsome men, usually of
small stature, and with dark hair, who occur pretty numerously in
South Wales and the West Highlands, and in Connemara.
Maes EnoU and the Wansdyke are generally believed (and I
agree with the verdict of the majority) to have been the work of
the Belgae, {.«., of a tribe of Belgic origin who crossing the
Channel, subdued the prior occupants of parts of Hampshire,
Wiltshire, Somerset and East Dorset Other Belgic tribes, as the
Attrebates in Berkshire, brought over their tribal names ; but as
the Belgic Gauls of the continent formed a confederation, it may
very well be that this special conquest was made by settlers from
several of the Belgic tribes, and therefore retained the appeUation
of the whole confederacy.
There has been a good deal of disputing as to who the con-
tinental Belgse were, ethnologically speaking, and you will fix)m
time to time see them set down, ex caihedrd, as Germans or as
Celts, according to the exigencies of the argument, or the leanings
Stanton Drew Circles^ &c. 13
of the writer. A good deal of partisanship and even of national
feeling has been imported into the question.
I have a pretty decided opinion of my own, but^ mindful of what
seems to me the ill-founded confidence of some other ethnologists,
I do not put it forth dogmatically. I believe the Belgse to have
been constituted as followa First a stratum of the early dolmen-
building race, the same who erected Stanton Drew, Avebury and
Stoney Littleton ; then one of the true Celtic, broad-headed race,
who for a time prevailed ; then one or more thin strata of a com-
paratively tall and fair race, more or less akin to the true Gotho-
(Jermans, who became the military aristocracy of the Belgse, but
who, if even they spoke German, of which there is no proof, did not
transmit that language to their subjects. The Belgse, I do
not doubt, spoke what is commonly called a Celtic tongue ; whether
it was a dialect nearer to the Gaelic or to the Eymric I cannot
say. Dr. Guest thought it approached the Gaelic, and though
that is not the prevailing opinion, I own to a great respect for
Dr. Guest's views.
It is generally supposed that the Wansdyke, together with the
gigantic earth fortress called Maes Knoll, which we have been
exploring, were meant by the Belgae to be a barrier against the
Dobuni or Boduni, and that these latter, the people of Gloucester-
shire, were at the time of their construction still a people o^
mainly, the old neolithic type. I think it was Mr. Hyde Clarke
who pointed out that the Boduni pretty early submitted to the
Romans, and that their doing so was consistent with the idea
of their being an Iberian tribe, who had been '* unterwerfen " and
somewhat tyrannized over by their Belgo-Gallic neighbours. I am
not aware of any craniological evidence against this conjecture.
NoTA. — The megalithic circles at Stanton Drew were visited in 1664 by John
Aubrey, M'ho is the first writer who mentions them. Perhaps the best
account of the monument is that by the late Mr. William Long, F.S. A., in
the *'Arch8eologicalJournal," vol. XV., pp. 190-215, and the most correct plan
of the remains yet published is that of Mr. 0. W. Dymond, in the Journal of
the British Archaeological Association, vol. XXXIII, p. 900.
A. E. H.
14 Clifton Antiqtiarian Club.
%%t iHegalttlitt Eematns at
By thk Riv. H. T. PERFECT, M.A.
{Read at Stanton Drew, May 28M, 1884.)
Stanton Drew, as well as Stonehenge and Avebury, is situated
in the district which is known to have been occupied by the Belgse.
Theie is a hamlet in this parish variously written as Belgetown,
Belluton, or Belton, which evidently took its name from the BelgsB
of this district The final syllable ^ ton/' which is Saxon, would
seem to point to the transitional period when BelgsB and Saxons
were contending together for the possession of the soil, at the time
when this town or homestead was still an important settlement
The veiy name of Beige-town, the close proximity of the stone
circles and the fortified camp of the Maes Ejioll, seem to bespeak
this immediate locality as one of the greatest importance in early
Celtic days, and offer a pleasing temptation to group these three
points together as collective evidence that the locality of Stanton
Drew was one of the leading centres of Celtic life in England amongst
the Belgse, or even centuries earlier amongst their predecessors.
However this may be, the so-called druidical remains in
this parish consist of one large circle adjoining a smaller one,
with apparently the remains of an avenue connecting the two
together. Several of the stones^ both in the laige circle as well as
in the avenue, are missing, having been broken up in olden days
when these monuments were not so carefully preserved as they now
are. Others are some little distance underground. The plan of
them which I have had the honour of presenting to your president
is one which was drawn out by the Rev. S. Seyer in 1822. I have
myself personally made a round of the stones on two or three
occasions in company with others, and by means of probing the
surface to a considerable depth with an iron bar, I am able to
Megalit hie Remains at Stanton Drew, 1 5
verify the existence of all those which are marked on the plan, with
the exception of four. These I am able to say with equal
confidence do not now exist. There is one very important stone
missing in the large circle which in all probability stood at the
head of the avenue. The stones in the smaller circle are of much
larger proportions than the rest, and one of them deserves special
attention. It looks like the remains either of one huge stone
broken by its fall, or of a pile of stones which had been constructed
for some specific purpose and had fallen abroad again. If these
circles contain any important interments it is here that they will
most likely be met with. Besides these two principal circles, there
is also another in an adjoining field, but the stones there are
of much inferior size. Near the church again there is a re-
markable group of one prostrate and two erect stones, supposed by
some to be the remains of a dolmen.
The stones are not all the same. They are of three or four di£fer-
ent kinds, the most striking of them being conglomerate or pudding
stone, which is the fundamental rock of Compton Martin, about 7
miles away. It is often a matter of wonder to visitors how such
huge blocks could ever have been transported from so distant a point,
and it certainly shows that they who superintended their removal
must either have been very remarkable for animal strength, which
would be an evidence of the greatest antiquity, or else of mechanical
knowledge and civilisation the remains of which do not exist. If
we look at the illustrations in Layard's Nineveh, and see how the
huge bulls were moved, we can easily imagine how these stones could
have been dragged along by means of many hands and many ropes
and rollers. But then we must remember that Nineveh and Egypt
were nations of the highest civilisation, possessed of the most
perfect scientific culture; whereas the primitive people who
erected these monuments have left us no remains whatever of
civilisation or of scientific knowledge.
The Druidical remains in this parish are usually classed with
those at Stonehenge and Avebury. The stones here do not bear
the mark of any tools, and are altogether ruder and smaller than
those at Stonehenge. Those at Stonehenge not only show the
mark of the tool, but are trilithons consisting of two uprights with
a slab on the top. The stones at Stanton Drew are supposed by
many, (although their opinion is rejected by some of the most
learned antiquaries), to have been raised by the Druids for
1 6 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
religious as well as political purposes : and some have connected
them with a very intricate system of astronomical observations or
of serpent worship— but of all this we simply know nothing.
The question of their age, again, has been a matter of much
dispute. Upon this point there are two great theories. One
that they were erected before the occupation of the country
by the Romans; the other that they were erected after that
period. If we admit the latter of these theories, we have a very
clever hypothesis submitted to us for our acceptance by Mr
Fergusson. He places the erection of the circles in this parish in
the Arthurian age, about A.D. 550, during the period when, after
the Romans had forsaken the land, the Britons had to contend
with the Saxons for the mastery of the soil Professor Pearson
the historian, would fall in with this view and connect them with
a new revival of Druidism which the Romans had done all in their
power to destroy. An argument is often brought forward in &vour
of this post-Roman theory, namely, that no mention is made of
these circles by the great Roman historians, although Roman roads
were constructed for military purposes in their immediate vicinity.
The absence of these accounts is assumed as an evidence that the
circles did not exist at that time. One Roman author, however,
Hecataeus, does allude to a magnificent circular temple in the Island
of the Hyperboreans over against Celtica^ which many archaeolo-
gists assume refers to Stonehenge ; but this is altogether doubtful.
It certainly is strange that the Romans should not have taken
more notice of the circles if they really did exist in their days
and were the temples of the Druids, for the Druids were a priestly
caste of great power in Britain during the Roman occupation, and
are known to have used all their influence in exciting the
Britons against the Romans. In addition to the testimony of
Hecatseus, another argument against the post-Roman theory, is
the fact that when a barrow was opened about 300 yards from
Stonehenge, under the superintendence of Sir Richard Hoare,
some time ago, there were found chippings not only of the stones
forming the outer circle, but of the stones which are of Syenic
character. Now these barrows belong to a period before the
Romans, and contain no Roman remains ; but they do contain
these chippings, which seem to require a belief that the circles
existed before the Roman occupation. I( on the other hand, we
believe these circles to belong to an earlier period than this, we
Megalithic Remains at Stanton Drew. 17
are driven into a choice of two alternatives, viz., that they were
the work of one of the many branches of the Aryan and Celtic
families, or of the still earlier settlers in the land who were ot
Turanian origin, such as the Basques in Spain, and others else-
where in the present day, and others again whose existence has
ceased to have any historical status in their westward course. In
any case we can easily imagine that these circles were used as
places of deliberation in social and political matters as well as for
religious purposes, and we may also easily conceive that the Druids,
if they did not actually erect them themselves, might have been
glad to take advantage of them to encourage their own religion by
the older traditional reverence of earlier tribes. In accepting this
latter theory, the pre-Roman one, which I myself prefer, we might
trace back the date of their erection by many centuries from the
Roman period to the time, at least, of the Patriarchs of JudsBa.
There is an indication in the Pentateuch of a desire to connect
holy events in family and national life with the erection of stones
in the history of the Abrahamic family. In Egypt we know, this
inclination had assumed at this time a form of the most stupendous
grandeur. I can easily imagine that tribes which had broken
away from the centre of Eastern civilisation many centuries before
this, and had separated themselves from the influence of scientific
knowledge, may have landed on these shores with only the rudest
elements of devotion connected with temples of stone and graves,
and dependent only upon manual and muscular power for the
expression of their devotional feelings. The absence of all
scientific knowledge in the history of such people would naturally
encourage us, when endeavouring to account for the removal
of such huge blocks of stone from their native soil — I say the
absence of all scientific knowledge on the part of these people
would naturally encourage us to date back the erection of their
stone monuments to the very earliest days, when civilisation and
scientific skill did not exist, and man's animal power was such as
now we cannot understand. This would lead one to believe that
these stone monuments belong rather to the earliest Turanian
dispersion from the far East than to the after emigration of the
Aryan tribes, which would include the various families of the
Celts.
1 8 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
0\\ some ^rtj)itectural SBlemaiiw o!
By THOMAS S. POPE.
(Read at Deer hurst. Sept, 29M, 1884.^
Before entering upon the immediate subject we are considering,
it is well to mention that most probably nearly all the first early
Saxon churches were somewhat similar to that formerly exist-
ing at Greensted, Essex, and illustrated in Vol. 3, of Weale's
" Quarterly Papers on Architecture" being constructed in great
part of timber ; which accounts for the ease with which the Saxon
buildings were burnt by the Danes.
In districts like this, near the Cotteswold Hills, where at that
time there must have existed considerable remains of Roman
villas and other works, the Saxon builders naturally used many of
the old materials near at hand, and in their new buildings copied
to the best of their ability what they saw around them ; as wc
modern architects still do.
There appear to be two dates in the Saxon work now remaining
at Deerhurst — one in the arches and remains in the choir and
transepts, particularly in the capitals to the arch at the east end,
and another in the tower- work and the triangular window. The
arches and remains at the eastern end retain the marks of fire
upon the stonework, and are ruder than those in the tower.
The original plan seems to have consisted of a choir with two
transepts, and an eastern end finished possibly with an apse for the
monks, shut off from the nave by a stone wall, (of which there were
traces until quite lately) and a door similar to that at Monkton
Pembroke ; a nave for the parishioners, and a kind of inner porch,
or narthex, possibly for those who had not been admitted to full
church membership ; a western tower, which also formed the porch.
Deerhiirst Pnory Church. J9
The first-floor chamber served probably as a watch-tower, more
especially for the river, judging from the two recesses now walled
up, but formerly having iron bars, and looking up and down the
river. A highly important arrangement in those days, when the
Danes ascended the rivers in their light boats, and possibly the
Welsh were not always as quiet as could be desired. Formerly
remains existed of a gallery in the south transept, as described
by Mr. Buckler in his MS. in the British Museum.*
This gallery might have been for the women, the early Saxon
convents generally consisting both of men and women, who retired
into monasteries for rest and quiet in those ages of lawlessness and
violence. We find galleries in the very early churches in Rome,
which are believed to have been built for the accommodation of
the women ; somewhat like the synagogue galleries of the present
day. The two openings remaining in the chancel walls, north and
south, seem to show there were two galleries.
The double triangular-headed window was probably always open,
giving light to the interior, being placed high up in the walls so
as to be out of reach of fire, and of the missiles of those attacking
the place. I have seen something similar in one of the early
churches at Rome, filled with pierced stonework.
We must, I think, consider that the Priory was in those early
times in constant danger of attack, so the openings were as few as
possible, and placed out of reacL The general aspect of the
country around may be gathered from the name as described by
the Yicar, and also from the fact that wolves' heads are carved as
terminations of the labels, tending to show that wolves were, at
that time, common animals in the neighbourhood.
The niche over the door, containing a figure said to represent
the Blessed Virgin, has a singular ornament under it, and there is
a similar one upon a fragment at Bradford-on-Avon.
The triangular-headed window in the tower, of which a rough
sketch from a drawing by Mr. J. 0. Buckler is here given,
is similar to the arcade over the western porch at Lorsch,
on the Rhine (date 774, A.D.). It is therefore not unreasonable
to think that the tower of Deerhurst and Bradford Church,
were erected about the same time, and the upper bowl of the font,
with its imitation ornament of the goldsmith's art, seems also to
*Tlii8 paper is to be published, with iUustrations, in the next volume of
the *' Proceedings of the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological Society."
20 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
be of the eighth century, whilst the eastern arches marked with
fire I take to be some of the work of the original founder, whoever
he might have been« The mouldings upon the eastern wall of tower,
and upon the chancel wall, mark the ancient Saxon roof, showing
that even at that time, the roof over the choir was higher than that
over the nave. The drawings in Lyson's '' Gloucestershire Antiqui-
ties,'' also show a different height of roof. The roof was, I think, a
comparatively low-pitched one to prevent too much of the church
being seen from a distance, .especially from the river, so as not to
attract an enemy. The fact that the cill of the triangular window in
the tower slopes outwards seems to show that originally it was an
exterior one. The long western window in the tower, with its curious
Lombardic oorbel, may have been used for the entrance of pro-
visions, and such other necessaries from the river ; and the tower
itself, as a refuge for the surrounding peasantry in times of danger
or inundation from the river. A similar corbel exists in the south
wall of church. The upper part of the tower has no doubt been
rebuilt at some later period, but I think with materials from an
ancient tower. The two triangular slabs in the eastern wall were
probably windows removed and built in the eastern gable during
one of the many alterations of the church.
Some of the remains of the dodrways and entrance to the- choir
are evidently, judging from their section, old materiab re-used, the
triangular headed ones being probably early Saxon.
The Aumbry in the south aisle is of very early date, and has
probably been removed and rebuilt in its present position ; it con-
tains a piscina, and a very curious circular recess upon its eastern
side, possibly for a relic.
The Font has undergone several vicissitudes, and appears to
consist of two separate stones ; whether two fonts or not it is
difficult to say, but evidently there are two different kinds of
work in the upper and the lower part, the upper reminding me
of the goldsmith's art, or early Irish manuscripts, rather than
mason's work. The representation of the little connecting links,
technically called "garters," inclines me to think it was copied
from goldsmith's work, for which the Saxons were celebrated
The lower portion has patterns very similar to some at the church
of S. Ambrogio, at Milan.
The arches over what I have called th^ Tiarihex are Norman,
and this arrangement of arches was probably intended to have
Deer hurst Priory Church. 21
been continued around the south aisle, judging from the remains
of Norman piers still in that aisle. The Normans probably found
the ancient church much dilapidated, and injured by 5re, but also
held in great reverence by the peasantry around, as having been
built by their Saxon ancestors. The Norman builders, therefore,
built up those side piers to assist in supporting the old church, and
then formed the openings at present filled in with the early English
arches (which, by the way, are very similar to work at St. David's,
and Llandaff), some time elapsing during the reconstruction, for
the church had now become an alien Priory, and possibly there
might have been some red-tapeism even in those early days. The
coloured stone reminds me of some that is found near Cardiff.
The north aisle appears to be 14th century, or " Decorated "
work, with some fine brasses at the east end; one dated 1400. Here
are two very early oak chests; judging from the curious framing and
ironwork they may possibly be 13th century work ; one of these
is figured in this volume.
The south aisle seems to have been rebuilt just before the
Reformation, judging from the Tudor windows ; or possibly the
walls were then raised. The corbels for the cloister roof remain in
this wall, and in the western side of the farm-house adjoining.
There are some fairly good 15th century oak seats in the south
aisle. Considering the time at which the church was restored,
we must congratulate the restorers for leaving us so much of this
most interesting church untouched. The chancel is fitted up with
some good Jacobean oak work, with the table in the centre and
seats around, which is said to be the work of the Puritana
To study these ancient churches to any purpose, we must begin
with the early churches of Rome itself Many Saxon churches
were re-built by the Benedictines ; in the case of Ramsey Abbey
we have the architect's name, Adnoth, who came, it would
seem, from Worcester, in the time of Dunstan, and may therefore
have been familiar with the buildings then existing at Deerhurst.
X^OTE. — lUustrations of Deerhurst Church may be found in Lysons a " Gloucester-
shire Antiquities," pi. 55, *' North and South Views of Deerhurst Priory/'
from drawings taken about 1790. In the "Journal of the British Archaeolo-
gical Association," vol. I, p. 17, a portion of the Sanctuary Arch, with Saxon
capital, (not correct as to details) and Id. p. 65, the upper part of the Font.
In the Rey. J. L. Petit's "Remaiks on Architectural Character," 1846, pi.
4, the couplet window in the Tower; also figured in " the Archieological
Journal,*' voL I, p. 32, and in most works on Saxon Architecture. In "the
Builder" for May 1st, 1886, are two sections of the Tower, and a ground-plan
of Deerhurst church, from drawings by Mr. R. H. Carpenter, A. E. Hi
22 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
By THE Rev. GEORGE BUTTER WORTH, M.A.
{Read at Deerhursty September 29M, 1884.)
A MONASTERY T^as probably founded at Deerhurst at the end of
the seventh or the commencement of the eighth century, by some
founder whose name is now lost to us, and, according to Leland,
Itinerary y vol, vi., p. 79, this is said to have been " a notable
Abbay" in the time of the Venerable Bede.— A.D. 674-785.
Though no such mention of Deerhurst can now be found in the
extant works of that great church-historian, we have no special
reason to doubt Leland's statement that such a record existed in
his time — c. 1500-1552. However, as the alleged mention of
the monastery by Bede rests solely on the authority of Leland,
that great antiquary may have been mistaken in this, as he cer-
tainly was in another portion of his account of the locaUty.
There can be no doubt that the monastery was in a flourishing
condition at the beginning of the ninth century, for in the year
804, some valuable estates were granted to it by iEthelric, son of
iEthelmund, ealdorman of Worcestershire, on condition that after
his death his body should be allowed to rest within its walls, and
that his soul and that of his father should be constantly held in
remembrance by the monks.- The words of the original document
relating to this bequest are given by Dugdale. (Codex Diploniati'
C118 Mvi Saxonici, No. 186.^
About the end of the ninth century or the beginning of the
tenth, the Danes became very troublesome in the Severn district.
rChronicle of Florence of Worcester for the years 894, 898, 915, &c.)
In one of their incursions they are said to have visited
Deerhurst, to have devastated the neighbourhood, and to have
Early History of Deer hurst. 23
destroyed the monastery. — (Lelafid's Itinerary.) To what extent
this alleged ''destruction" by the Danes of the monastic
buildings was accomplished, we cannot tell; probably the
portions built of wood were entirely consumed, but the church
and other parts, if any such there were, which were con-
structed of stone, remained standing, and were almost immedi-
ately afterwards repaired, and re-occupied by the monks, who had
temporarUy been scattered. One of these brethren, afterwards
known as " St. Werstan," is said to have fled to Malvern, where
he founded a cell, that in course of time expanded into the great
Benedictine foundation, of which some majestic fragments re-
main in Malvern Abbey Church and Gate-House. William of
Malmesbury informs us that Alphege, or Elphege (who was after-
wards Archbishop of Canterbury, was murdered by the Danes,
and, as St. Alphege, still retains a place in our Book of Common
Prayer) became Bishop of Winchester, A.D. 980, in succession to
Bishop iEthelwold. The same writer also tells us that Alphege
had, previously, taken the habit at "Dirhest," which at that period
was a " small cell." After living at Deerhurst for some years,
Alphege grew dissatisfied with the want of discipline and worldli-
ness of the brethren, and retired to a stricter religious house at
Bath, where he afterwards was appointed Abbot. From this it
appears that soon after the middle of the tenth century, Deer-
hurst monastery, so far from being " utterly destroyed, " was,
in one sense, in too flourishing a condition, and that peace and
plenty caused the prevalence there of too good cheer. From the
end of the tenth century till the middle of the eleventh, nothing
is known of the history of the monastery, and during this period
the Danish incursions may or may not have been repeated. There
is evidence, however, that at the latter date there were still some
monks in the Priory, as a Saxon thane named ^Ifric, or
Elfric, who had become a monk, died at Deerhurst, A.D. 1058,
and was buried at the neighbouring Abbey of Pershore. Now
this Elfric had two brothers, Odda and Dodda. Of the latter,
not much is known, except that his name appears in history in
connection with those of his brothers, both of whom he is said to
have survived. The third brother, Odda, also called iEthelwine,
was a ^uch more important personage. He is described by
Florence of Worcester, as the " friend of the churches, the solace
of the poor, the protector of widows and orphans, the enemy of
24 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
oppression, the shield of virginity." (Chronicle^ A,D. 1Q51J
On the banishment of Earl Godwine, by King Edward the Con-
fessor, in 1051, Odda, who appears to have been related to the
King, was made Earl over all the western part of Godwine's
earldom and part of Swegen's, namely over Somerset, Devon, Dor-
set, and " the Wealas," that is, no doubt, over Cornwall. {Freeman ;
" Old English History,'' p. 268.) In 1052, Earl Odda was ap-
pointed to the command of the English fleet sent against Earl
Godwine, but does not appear to have had much success. On
the second of the calends of September (the 31st of August), A.D.
1056, Odda died, in his own monastery at Deerhurst," having
previously been made a monk by Bishop Mldied, of Worcester ;
but his body was carried to the grander Abbey of Pershore,
where he was buried with great pomp.
In the year 1675, a stone was dug up in an orchard at Deer-
hurst, thus inscribed, in letters generally considered to be of the
11th or early part of the 12th century; the letters printed in
smaller type are enclosed within those which precede them : —
*ODDA DVX IVSSIT HANG REGIAM AVLAM CON-
STRVI ATQVE DeDiCARI IN HONORE S TEINITATIS
PEO ANIMA GeRMANI SVI iELFRICI QvE DE HOC
LOCo ASVPTA EALDREDV8 VERO EPS QVI EANDE
DeDiCAVIT n IDiBVS APL XHII AVTE ANNO $ REGNI
EADWARD(I) REGIS ANGLORV.
" Duke Odda had this Royal Hall built and dedicated to the
honour of the Holy Trinity, for the soul of his brother Elfric,
which quitted the body in this spot. Bishop Ealdred dedicated
the same on the second of the Ides of April, in the 14th year of
the reign of Eadward King of England," i.e., A.D. 1056.
This stone, which is preserved in the Ashmolean Museum at
Oxford, was not found close to the church, but in an orchard near
the house known as Abbot's Court, about 100 yards to the south-
west of the church; the finder of the inscrpition was **Mr.
(afterwards Sir) John Powell," the upright Judge who was dis-
missed by James H., and replaced on the bench by William III.
He was lessee of the Abbot's Court property at that time, under
the Chapter of Westminster.
On the authority of this inscribed stone, Deerhurst Church
was described by the late John Henry Parker, C.B., as**the
Early History of Deerhurst. 25
oldest dated church in England," but he was hardly justified, I
imagine, in bo doing, as the term '' Aula Begia '' may not refer
to the church, but to some other building erected by Duke Odda.
If, however, Odda did not rebuild the church, but confined his
work to the less sacred buildings of the Priory, and we actually
see, at the present day, a church much older than anything he
may have erected, it will have to be conceded that, whatever
ravages the Danes committed on their alleged visit to Deerhurst,
they, at all events, contrary to their usual line of proceeding,
spared the church. There can be no doubt of the accomplish-
ment of some considerable work by Odda, which was commemo-
rated by an act of episcopal consecration, and probably the church
was rebuilt by him. Touching the date of the existing church
there is a strong presumption in favour of a late Anglo-Saxon
date, and, at all events, we cannot assert of a single feature in
the building that it must have been there before Odda undertook
his good work.
As Mr. Pope has undertaken to describe the architectural re-
mains, I will not refer to them further at present, but will pass on
to some of other points of interest in the history of the parish.
In A.D. 1016, exactly forty years before Odda's building was
consecrated, the celebrated meeting took place, on an island within
bowshot of the Priory, which resulted in the division of the king-
dom between the Saxon, Edmund Ironside, and the Dane, Cnut or
Canute. The scene of the meeting now goes by the name of
the ''Naight," and is a wedge-shaped meadow adjoining the
Severn, bounded on one side by a little stream, but is no longer an
island as it was described in the last century by Atkyns and
Eudder. The good people of Gloucester have sometimes claimed
for the " Eyot " close to their city the honour of having been
the scene of this meeting ; but, as " the articles of peace " were
certainly signed at Deerhurst, our little " Naight " is far more
hkely to have been the spot.
Of the " worthies of Deerhurst " we have already mentioned the
two saints Werstan and Alphege, the powerful Earl Odda and his
two brothers Dodda and JElfric. In the north aisle of the church is
a fine brass of the date A.D. 1400, recording the death of Sir John
Gassy, Chief Baron of the Exchequer in the reign of Edward HE.,
and his wife Alicia. He is represented in his Judge's robes,
with a lion at his feet ; she in a long, loose dress, fastened at
26 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the wrists and neck ; a dog at her feet, differs from all
other such representations, in bearing its name Tim, engraved
beneath. Above the effigies is a rich double canopy, and a
figure of the Virgin receiving instruction from her mother, St.
Ann. A figure of St. John the Baptist has disappeared since the
beginning of the century, when the monument was figured in
Lysons's " Ohiuiestershire Antiquities" plate 18. The inscription
round the stone reads —
"9tc jAcet |oI|^ €^%ti mxUn qtunbam (^tofxislvi |tftto Jiccti fltgU
qui obtU (mtjo) ftie ^ait ^nno lint: ffi€(S€€. et jLltctat ttxot ^w
qitoc* aubttji ppcr beti^,*'
For more than a century the Gassy family appear to have
held the same estate in Deerhurst parish, and their crest still
appears on the front of an interesting moated house on this
estate, a mansion which would be worth visiting by any anti-
quaries interested in early domestic architecture.
There are other monumental brasses in the church ; to a lady
"Elizabeth, daughter of Thos. Bruges, Esq., of Coverle, and
wife of Wm. Cassey, Esq., of Whyghtfylde, and then of Walter
Bowden, Esq., 1525," of which the inscription is lost, though the
effigy remains ; and to " Edward Guye, Gent, 1612 ; by his wife
Frauncis, eldest daughter of John Gotheridge, Esq., he had six
sonnes and one daughter." (See Haines's " Manual,** 11. p. 68.)
There are also several stone slabs with sculptured arms and
inscriptions of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.
In the West window of the South aisle is some good fourteenth
century stained glass, the only portion remaining of the large
quantity that must have at one time added so greatly to the
beauty of the church.
The Saxon Font is well known, and is generally supposed to
be one of the most ancient specimens left to us. It was for
many years standing in a farm yard, but has been restored to
the church, and re-united to its stem, which was discovered a
few years ago, more than a mile from the church.
Saxon Chapel Discovered at Deer hurst. 27
3Ketentl^ BBiseoberetn at BBeeriiurst.
By ALFRED E. HUDD. F.S.A., Hon. Secretary.
{Read December Uthy 1885.)
Since the members of the Club visited Deerhurst, ia September,
1884, discoveries of great interest to antiquaxians and architects,
as well as to the general public, have been made in the imme-
diate neighbourhood of the Priory church in that village. These
discoveries are of such importance, that, as remarked by a recent
writer in " The Builder," (Nov. 21st, 1885), the monastic history
of Deerhurst has been seriously misunderstood, and must be re-
ai'ranged to agree with the facts which have lately been brought
to Ught.
It has been thought that a brief account of the more important
of these discoveries might be of interest to those of our members
who visited Deerhurst, as an addition to the papers which were
read on that occasion by the Rev. George Butterworth, and Mr.
T. S. Pope, both of which are printed in this volume.
The last few years have added considerably to our knowledge
of the architectural remains of pre-Norman times, and it is now
generally admitted that the Saxons had a distinct architectural
style of their own, not derived from Normandy, but more nearly
resembling the early work of North Italy and the Rhine district.
The West of England is rich in remains of this " primitive
Romanesque style," amongst which the most famous are the
cruciform church of St. Lawrence, Bradford-on-Avon, built by
St. Aldhelm early in the eighth century (A.D. 705), the larger
Priory church at Deerhurst, and the nave of the parish church
at Avebury, all three of which buildings are well known to most
of us. The discovery in the little village of Deerhurst of a
second church of undoubted Saxon date has not only greatly
28 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
increased the interest in that popular place for antiquarian pil-
grimages, but has added materially to our knowledge of the
architecture of the period, a period just preceding that in which
our earliest English style gave place to the foreign style brought
in by the Normans.
In plate LV. of the " Collection of Gloucestershire Antiqui-
ties/' published by Samuel Lysons, F.S.A., in 1804, is an illus-
tration of " the north view of the Priory of Deerhurst," in the
background of which may be noticed a picturesque half-timbered
house, standing a short distance (rather more than one hundred
yards) to the S.W. of the church. This house, called " Abbot's
Court," consists of an irregular block of buildings of various
dates, the original erection having been added to at both ends ;
the eastern addition consists of the fine half-timbered erection
partially shown by Lysons, and is probably of the time of Eliza-
beth, or James I., while the western portion, plain and more
modern looking, may have been added a century or two ago.
Until the beginning of the year (1885) this house had been occu-
pied by a tenant farmer, renting under the Ecclesiastical Com-
missioners, who took over this farm with the remainder of their
estates in the neighbourhood, from the Chapter of Westminster
Abbey, to which the property had belonged since the year
A.D..1065 (if not earlier).* In consequence of the Abbot's Court
farm having been joined to another by the Commissioners, the
old house was no longer required by the farmer, who has a more
convenient residence upon another portion of the estate. The
Abbot's Court buildings were therefore, at the beginning of
August last, placed under the charge of Mr. Thomas Collins, of
Tewkesbury, the well known builder whose careful treatment of
ancient work in the numerous local buildings he has restored is
probably known to many members of this Club; the. choice of
the Commissioners was from an antiquarian point of view,
a most fortunate one. The original intention was to con-
vert the farm house into two or three separate tenements, but,
soon after the commencement of the alterations, features of great
interest — which had been hidden for centuries under the mass of
plaster and whitewash with which the walls were covered, both
inside and out — were brought to light, and proved of so important
* Set letter from the Rev. Georse Butterworth in the ** Journal qf the British
ArehcMogical AsaocicUion,''* voL XLI., p. 415.
Saxon Chapel Discovered at Deerhurst. 29
a character, that upon their bemg reported by Mr. Butterworth
to the Commissioners, orders were at once given that all these
ancient remains should be carefully preserved.
The first of these discoveries was made in the following
manner. Mr. Butterworth had always suspected, from the great
thickness of its walls, that the central portion of Abbot's Court
was very old, but had not until last summer discovered anything
to indicate its age. On visiting the house soon after the com-
mencement of the repairs, in August last, a faint indication of a
semi-circle under the plaster covering the front wall caused him
to carefully examine this portion of the building, and, upon
removing some of this covering, the remains of a round-headed
doorway of very early character, were exposed. The eastern half
of this arch had unfortunately been destroyed when the large
square window of the farm house was inserted, but enough
remained to indicate the great antiquity of the work. (See plate,
"North door.") Shortly after this, some peculiarity about a
window at the back of the house which gave light to a room on
the first floor, caused the Vicar and Mr. Collins to remove
a portion of the plaster from its upper portion and side, when a
very curious double-splayed, round-headed window, of undoubt-
edly "primitive Eomanesque" or Saxon character, was brought
to hght. (See plate, " Nave window.")
In the opinion of Mr. J. H. Middleton, F.S.A., who read a
paper on the subject of the recent discovery to the Society of
Antiquaries, this window and others similar to it (which have been
destroyed) were probably always open to the air, and like those
remains of which we saw on our recent visit to Avebury church,
are believed to have been furnished with " wattle and daub "
osier screens. A portion of the oak lining to the head of one of
these windows, was found in sitit ; the arch of this window is
formed of long, thin pieces of blue lias, with mortar joints from
lin. to 2ins. in thickness, and was covered with stucco. It is
double splayed, its sill being about lO^ft. from the ground, its
opening about 2Jft. wide by 8ft. Sins. high. The construction of
the voussoir of thin slabs of stone, instead of ashlar work,
gives the window a very Boman-like appearance, reminding one
of the Boman work at Lincoln, Dover and elsewhere, and it tends
to show, that unless the 11th century builder copied some work
then existing in the neighbourhood, that this portion of the
30 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
building is of much greater antiquity than the age of the Con-
fessor. Opposite to this, in front of the house, and on the same
level above the ground, there are remains of what may have been
a similar window, but this at the time of my visit was left in the
condition in which it had been in use for centuries, and looked
like one of the small square windows usually found in such
situations ; probably its ancient features were destroyed at the
same time as the eastern half of the North door.
An examination was then made by Mr. Butterworth and Mr.
Collins of the interior of the house, and in a small room which
had been used as a pantry, two large rough looking stones were
noticed partially projecting from the west wall, and covered with
plaster. The stones, which were placed 6^ft. apart, and about 7ft.
above the floor, proved upon examination to be the imposts of a
large circular headed archway, the very rough and solid jambs of
which were found under the plaster ; the crown of the arch had
unfortunately been destroyed. (See plate, ** Chancel arch.'*)
Mr. Butterworth then thought it was time to make his discovery
known, and consequently, on August 17th, he wrote to the London
" Timez " an account of "A Saxon House in Gloucestershire,"
and described the structure as a small house, 80ft. long on the
outside, with walls 2|^ft. thick, its four external walls being per-
fect, in one of which was the large archway named above, a
smaller arch being in the north wall forming the front of the
house. It was then thought that the house had always
had an upper storey, and, notwithstanding the presence of an
early English bracket in one of the angles, no idea that the
building had been a Chapel occurred at that time either to the
Vicar, or to Mr. Collins. This however proved to be the case,
and on September 28rd, Mr. Butterworth wrote to inform me
that since he had written to The Times further discoveries had
caused him to modify his first opinion, and that it was nearly
certain that the old building was an ancient Chapel. The most
important of these IsAerJiiids was an inscribed stone, which was
found built into the wall at the back of the house, where it had
been hidden by a fruit tree growing against the wall. This stone
had unfortunately been mutilated in mediaeval times by the
central portion being cut away to utilize it as the head of a lancet
window, but a portion of the inscription remains, and is
figured on the Plate as it now appears.
Saxon Chapel Discovered at Deer hurst. 31
Yarious restorations of this inscription have been attempted, and
by filling in letters to fill the spaces according to the ideas of the
different writers, it has been supposed to have read, either — " In
honour of the Holy Trinity this altar is dedicated " — which is the
version now most generally received, or, "In honorem Sancti
Petri Apostoli hoc Altare dedicatum est," as suggested by Mr. J.
T. Micklethwaite, F.S.A.
In 1676, another inscribed stone, now in the Ashmolean
Museum at Oxford, was found in the orchard adjoining Abbot's
Court, which also recorded a dedication to the Holy Trinity;
this inscription has been previously given in this volume, in
Mr. Butterworth's paper. As there stated, this had always,
before the late discoveries were made, been taken to refer
to Deerhurst Church, but it is now almost certain that it
belonged to this little Saxon chapel, which is therefore probably
the Boyal Hall which Duke Odda caused to be dedicated to the
glory of the Holy Trinity and in memory of his brother Elfric,
and which was dedicated in the year 1066.
I think there can be little doubt but that in these remains we
have a portion of Earl Odda's chapel, and that the writer in Tlxe
Builder of Nov. 21st, 1886, is correct in applying to these
interesting relics, the account given by William, of Malmesbury
in his ** Oesta Pontijicum** (Hamilton's edn. p. 109), in which
we are told that in A.D. 980 Athelwold, Bishop of Worcester,
was succeeded by Elphege, who had taken the habit at " Dirhest,"
at that time a small cell (exiguum cenoUum), but in A.D. 1126,
when the account was written (^antiquitatis inane simulacrum J , an
empty ruin. These words of William of Malmesbury would
accurately designate the desolate condition of the '* little cell " if
we are right in conjecturing it to be the newly discovered chapel.
The same writer states that there is in the British Museum a
Tewkesbury Chronicle, which records that " Almaric, the brother
of Earl Odda, was buried at Deerhurst in a small chapel opposite
the gate of the Priory, because that chapel was formerly the
Eoyal Hall."
It has been supposed that the chapel formed part of a Manor
House belonging to the Abbey of Westminster, which was
probably the residence of the steward of the estates.
From the presence in the east wall of the chapel, near the site
of the altar, of a beautiful little early English bracket, there can
32 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
be little doubt that religious services were held here during the
18th century, long after the time of William of Malmesbury, but
at what period the chapel ceased to be so used we have no
evidence, except that of the date of the building which occupies
the site of the destroyed portion of the chancel, which is late
16th or early 17th century work.
I understand from the vicar that a Committee, consisting of
some of the leading archaeologists of the county, has been formed,
under whose direction it is hoped that, by the consent of the
Ecclesiastical Commissioners, steps will be taken to carefully
preserve this most interesting building.
Very little originaUty can be claimed for these notes, which are
chiefly compiled (by consent of the writers) from accounts that
have been published in various newspapers and journals. Shortly
after the discovery of the remains, in August last, I paid a visit
to Deerhurst with an antiquarian friend, when the vicar most
kindly received us, and showed us all that had then been found.
Those who wish further information on the subject are referred
to the letters from the vicar (the Eev. G. Butterworth) published
in The Times newspaper for Aug. 17th and Nov. 4th, 1885 ; in
the Journal of the Brit. Arch. Assocn. for Dec, 1885, vol. 41,
pp. 414-418 ; and in Oloucestershire Notes and Queries^ vol. 8,
pp. 804-7 ; also to fuller accounts by an anonymous writer in
The Builder for Nov. 21st and Dec. 12th, 1885, in which much
valuable information, both architectural and historical, is given.
The paper read by Mr. Middleton, F.S.A., to the Society of
Antiquaries, has not yet been published, but a brief communication
on the subject was contributed by him to the Academy ^ Sept. 26th,
1885, which is reprinted in Oloucestershire Notes and Queries.
The Club is indebted to Mr. Walter de Gray Birch, F.S.A., Hon. Sec.,
and the Council of the British Archseological Association, for the loan of the
plate of illustrations, from their journal, vol. 41, part 4. Also to Mr. Collins, of
Tewkesbury, for drawings of the ground plan and eleyations of Abbot's Court and
the Saxon Chapel, which he kindly sent for the inspection of the members.
3>eerhxirsir CbxircL
Mark Clfxxjirck
JL^chlade Cb.
I
i
3
o
i
i
■J
a
On Old Carved Chests. 33
^n ^Iti Carbetr Cfje$;t<«
By THOMAS S. POPK.
{Read November V2(h, 1884.)
In the middle ages carved Chests formed the most usual
domestic furniture, and were used for tables and seats,
scarcely a room being without one of them; dresses, silver, linen,
and valuables of all kinds were kept in them. They formed, with
the cupboard and the bed, the principal furniture of the rich as
well as of the poor, and, covered with leather, they served as
trunks do now-a-days for transport in travelling. Large chests
called ^^BtandanW were used by the King and nobility in moving
their goods and furniture several times a year from house to
house. In the 13th century the Chest-makers formed a portion of
the Corporation of Carpenters and by their rules were forbidden
to let out their chests for dead bodies, as they, the chests, were
taken to the cemeteries, emptied of their contents and returned to
be used again on similar occasions. Coffins were often called
chests, as in the epitaph at Chepstow on a man named Chest : —
** Here lies one Chest within another.
That chest was good which was made of wood,
But who will say so of the other ? '*
The Synod of Exeter, in 1287, required every parish to provide
" cista ad lihros et Vestimenta " and valuable chests are often
mentioned in old wills. Some of the richest of them were pro-
bably those sent by the bridegroom to the bride, the night before
the marriage, filled with dresses and jewels, and kept during the
lives of the mscrried couple as articles of furniture.
Representations of old chests are sometimes carved upon the
stonework of old churches ; the tradesman was shewn with his
chest open and the miser sleeping upon his chest. Upon the ex-
8
34 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
terior of the choir screen at Amiens cathedral a chest is shewn,
in use as a writing desk. At the Louvre in Louis Xlllth's time, the
hall of the guards was still provided with chests, which served as
seats.
Many old chests were simply trunks of trees hollowed out
in the middle and bound around wdth wrought iron, much of
which is very beautiful in design as in the chest at Brampton
church, Northamts., which appears to be of the 12th century, and
upon similar chests in Westminster Abbey. Many of these
chests are bound together at the angles with wrought iron ; but
the fact that a chest is rude in workmanship does not prove its
age. Most chests were raised about 6ms. from the floor upon
two legs to preserve the contents from damp and dust, and many
had three locks, commonly believed to have been one for the
parson, and one for each of the churchwardens ; but I think the
number of the locks was proportioned to the value of the contents
of the chest. Some of these locks are of very good design, as are
those in Fairford church, at Zeals house, Wiltshire, and
that illustrated in Pugin. Mr. Parker in his ** Glossary '* says
there is a peculiarity in Early English chests, which is that
a strong piece of wood is fixed across each end of the lid, on the
underside of it, appearing on the outside when the chest is
closed ; and the end of this and the upright piece at the back of
the chest are halved together, and an iron pin is put through
them, so as to form a hinge. I believe I have seen such, but
have never sketched one. There are many illustrations published
of old chests in antiquarian and architectural books. Possibly, one
of the earliest is that in ** The Glossary *' from Stoke Debenham,
Surrey. The peculiar ornament of a circle with patterns mitred
*to a centre occurs upon chests of all dates, and a similar pattern
upon stools sent from the West coast of Africa. These are there-
fore no marks of date.
Nails arranged in different ways are very effective ornaments in
old chests, as in old doors, but this method of ornamentation has
been much neglected in modern work, unwisely, I think, as it
is effective and not costly. Many pretty pieces of metal work are
found upon old chests, such as escutcheons to locks, handles, etc.
The handles at the ends of chests are generally good examples of
hammered iron work, thoroughly well adapted to their purpose.
It is very difficult to state with any precision the date of old
On Old Carved Chests, 35
chests ; we can only judge from the general appearance of the
framing and workmanship.
At Sion in Switzerland I saw an old chest of deal with Eoman-
esque arches carved upon it, but had not time to make a drawing,
or to examine it thoroughly. Dr. Liebke in his " Ecclesiastical
Art," mentions an early Eomanesque chest with carved round
arches and ''Ave Maria'' at Sittern, in Wallis. The chest from Deer-
hurst in my illustrations Figs. 1 and 2, and that from Mark church,
Fig. 3, are very old, judging from their framing and appearance.
The cope chest in Wells cathedral, is probably of the
13th century. That at the old church, Chippenham (see
sketches of two sides, Figs. 5 and 6), is the most
interesting example I have met with in this neighbour-
hood, and judging from the quatrefoil diaper and metal
work is probably of early date, say early 14th century ; it
is evidently intended to represent a farmyard, with the horses,
geese, owls, etc. The chest at St. John's church, Glastonbury,
formerly used for containing the ancient cope now degraded to a
pall, appears to be early 14th century, and is a very good example
of its kind ; the shields only were coloured, and upon the sides are
examples of the ordinary sunk circles mentioned above.*
The fine chest — Fig. 7 — I found in a shop at Highworth, and
was informed that it had formerly belonged to the church,which has
been " restored to death." The chest is ornamented with flam-
boyant tracery, but I think it is of English work, probably 14th
century ; it is now in the possession of the Eector of Highworth.
The chest in Minehead church is most probably Flemish, as
may be more particularly seen in the panel upon the side carved
with a skull and cross bones at the foot of a cross. Col. Bramble
thinks it may have been a Eeliquary altar.
It is not unusual to find chests fastened with three padlocks ;
in that at Mark church, Somerset, (Fig. 3) the padlocks are
rude representations of men's heads. At Mark is also another
chest, covered with leather, which you are asked to believe is
made from a man's skin ; it is certainly thick enough for any-
thing. Many old chests were made of cedar- wood, which was
reputed to keep the contents safe from insects ; these chests were
usually painted upon the inside. Perhaps one of the best known
* This chest has been figured recently, in'' The BuildA-,'* JskU. 9th, 1886, p. 108.
36 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
and largest chests in this neighbourhood is that still remaining
at Iron Acton Court, made of yew tree, and ornamented with
poker paintings upon the inside. A curious chest, also of yew,
is illustrated in Buckler's " Churches of Essex," from Ingatestone ;
this chest was bound with wrought iron, interlacing as usual,
the yew being only Jin. thick, and lined on the inside with strong
linen ; each of the cross bands is turned into a hinge. A
common type is that in Portbury church, an oak chest
bound around with thin wrought-iron interlacing; many such
occur in country churches. The admixture of gothic and renais-
sance details in chests of the early 16th century is curious ; another
common form of late 15th century work is that of chamfered framing
filled in with linen pattern panels, as in Fig. 9, a chest which is
put together with oak pegs.
A mark of Jacobean chests is a festooned facia or fringe at the
bottom ; another feature is the very pretty arabesque patterns
in low relief upon the framing, shown in my drawings of the oak
chests from Shireharapton and Bowden Hill, Wilts, the patterns,
cut in such low relief that one might easily rub off an im-
pression like a brass. Another not uncommon design in 16th
century work is that of laurel wreaths, enclosing the arms
of the family in a central panel, with rude portraits of the
owners, gentleman and lady, one on either side ; as that in Louth
Church, Lincolnshire, illustrated in Collings's ** Gothic Architec-
ture ; " in this case the Royal arms, with the king and queen.
Most of the older Jacobean chests have the mouldings upon the
framing rim, ** butt up," as the carpenters term it, as is done in
the modern Queen Anne style. Where the mouldings are mitred
at the angles, one may be quite sure the work is of comparatively
modern date ; such are the chests at Axbridge, Pucklechurch,
and that at Tytherington.
It is common to hear in Devonshire that the carved oak
was brought by the Spanish Armada, and some of the
richer patterns rather favour that idea ; such as the richly
inlaid chest, Fig. 8, from Lyme Regis church, at which
town it is related how the people assembled on the cliffs
to see the Armada sail across the West Bay, and they also sup-
plied ships for the defence of their country. Our secretary, Mr.
Alfred Hudd, has a very pretty Spanish chest, covered with black
leather, with the date 1636, and the rose and pomegranate
On Old Carved C/tests. 37
worked out in nails. At Llanrhaiadr church, Denbigshire, is a
very quaint old chest, in one piece, hollowed out of a trunk of a
tree, with alms box upon the top. We most of us know the
pretty mortuary chests on the screens of Winchester cathedral,
said to contain the bones of the Saxon kings. They are renais-
sance in style, and made of oak and chestnut, the work of
Bishop Pox, date 1525.
I have been asked to mention the carved chest in St. Mary Red-
cliflfe church ; it appears to me to be an old chest with some of the
panels carved in modern times, and the figures added to the
angles. The modern manufacture of old chests is carried on to
a great extent, and is a simple one. The " Artist " purchases for
a few shillings an old oak chest without carving ; he then covers
it with a pattern, most likely copied from some really old oak
chest or wainscotting ; then varnishes it with varnish with a little
dark stain, and sells the " old oak chest " at a very remunerative
price.
Scarcely one of these old chests quite resembles another, which
seems to shew them to have been the work of separate persons ;
many no doubt of the village carpenter, who thus amused him-
self during the long winter evenings, before the days of penny
newspapers. He copied to the best of his ability what he saw in
the churches and halls around him, varying the design some-
what ; some of these designs seem to be taken from the bind-,
ings of old books.
I can only hope in conclusion that these remarks are not quite
as dry as the dust in the chests about which I have been
endeavouring to interest you. The continual manufacture of
shams has been my principal motive in writmg this paper, to
warn my friends of modern antiques.
Mr. Pope's paper was illustrated by upwards of forty tracings
from drawings by the author, chiefly from examples in the
western counties of England, dating from the thirteenth to the
seventeenth century, including —
Old chests at Deerhurat, Fairford, Hightvorthy Wells, Chijy-
penhairty Slymbridge, Glastonbury, Minehead, Portbury, Zeals
House, Cirencester, Lyme Regis ^ Clifton, Tytherington,
Bowden Hill, Elberton, Stanton St. Quinton, Lechlade,
3^ Clifton AniiquaHan Club.
Wanborough, Tormorton, Shirehampton, Mark^ Wroughton,
Slaughterford, Middlezoy, Easton Grey, Biddestone and many
others. The examples from places, the names of which are
printed in italics in the above list, are figured in this volume,
having been lithographed for the purpose by Mr. . Eoland W.
Paul, to whom the Club is also indebted for the lithographs of
Long Ashton, Chew Magna, etc., printed in this volume.
«. . ai L» J ■
Mediceval Armour. 39
iHetitaebal Armour.
By Lieut. -Col. J. R. BRAMBLE, Hon. Treasurer.
{Read March \lth, 1885.)
During the excursions which we have had the opportunity of
making to churches in the neighbourhood, I have on many occa-
sions had the honour to call your attention to the various types
of Armour and other costume represented in monumental effigies ;
and occasionally it has happened that, owing to the fortunate
circumstance of there being within the compass of a single day's
excursion, or, still better, in a single church, examples of Armour
of several distinct periods, I have been able to point out to you
to some extent the special peculiarities characteristic of the
different dates, and to explain the means by which any one with
a fair knowledge of such peculiarities may assign a date approxi-
mately correct to any examples which may come before him.
But, notwithstanding the great extension of Antiquarian lore
during the last twenty years, it is still a most common expeiience
to find, on visiting a church, whether in town or country, that
the date assigned by tradition to any effigy without an inscrip-
tion, which has been there for so long a time that the " memory
of man runneth not to the contrary," is completely and often
ludicrously incorrect — from one to two hundred years being
comparatively a trivial error. An effigy at St. Philip's Church
was long pointed out as being that of Bobert, son of William the
Conqueror, although the armour was some 200 years later ; and
other instances might be quoted by the dozen.
Some few years ago I accompanied our Vice-President, Mr.
John Reynolds, and Mr. George Wright the Congress Secretary
of the British Archseological Association, to Tewkesbury, to make
arrangements for the visit of that Association. In passing up
40 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the north aisle of the nave of the magnificent Abbey church, I
casaally assigned the date of 1875 to an effigy in the armour of
that period. The expression of mingled scorn and triumph
which passed over the really very intelligent countenance of the
verger was not readily to be forgotten ; he evidently thought he
had caught the Antiquarians napping, and exclaimed, '' No, Sir !
that is Lord Wenlock, who was killed at the Battle of Tewkesbury
in 1471." If the monument had been that of the unfortunate
nobleman in question he must, as was well said at the subse-
quent visit of the Association, '' Have gone in his grandfather's
armour," but neither this fact nor the circumstances that Lord
Wenlock was not buried at the Abbey, and that the arms, " a
chevron between three lions masks " were not his, had any effect
whatever upon the tradition. There was a monument and a
name' must be given to it. The tradition is now completely
exploded, and the anecdote is simply given as an instance among
many others of anachronisms arising from want of knowledge
of this very interesting branch of Archeology.
Under these circumstances it has occurred to me that if we
could have the opportunity of examining at one time a complete
series of mediseval monuments of all the different dates which
are to be found in English churches, and of tracing from the
effigies upon such monuments the gradual development of armour
from complete mail to complete plate, from complete plate
through the second mail period, and so on to its gradual almost
entire disappearance, more real information would be afforded in
comparatively a short time than would be gained by the inspec-
tion of a much larger number of isolated examples not presented
before us in chronological order. Except in a few large cathe-
drals such an opportunity is not to be obtained. The series of
rubbings from Monumental Brasses laid before you this evening
will, however, amply illustrate the subject to which your notice is
invited.
Li the brief notes to be laid before you it will be hardly
necessary to say that it is not proposed to do more than to give
such a general description of the different styles of mediffival
armour as will enable any one giving fair attention to the rules,
and careful consideration of the examples, to understand the
varieties which we are likely, in the course of our wanderings, to
encounter. Anyone desirous of pursuing the subject further has
Mediceval Armour. 4 1
ample opportunity afforded him in the works of Sir Samuel
Meyrick, Hewitt, Planche, Haines, and others, by whom it has
long since been amply illustrated. It must be fully understood,
however, that it is impossible in armour, as in architecture, or
any other matter of archaeological enquiry, to set down any hard
or fast line, and to say '' up to a certain date such and such
armour was worn ; after such date a different style was adopted."
Such a statement can only be approximately correct. There are
certain broa.d lines and distinctive styles, but they are shaded
into one another in a gradual and almost imperceptible manner.
Still, by careful examination and comparison of various examples,
it is quite possible with armour, as in architecture, to form a
pretty accurate judgment as to the date of any particular speci-
men, and in doing so the architectural accessories are often of
very great assistance.
For our present purposes it is not necessary to go back to the
times of our primitive ancestors, and trace the first use of
defensive armour ; to imagine how one of the early Britons first
conceived the idea that a coat made of ox-hide would keep out an
arrow better than a coat of paint, and that it was better to parry
the blow of a club with the bone of a dead animal than with the
arm of a living man.
Neither is it necessary to describe the richly embossed armour
of the Greeks, upon which Homer dilates with all the enthusiasm
of one born of a nation of warriors ; the plainer armour of the
Bomans ; the chain armour of the Scythians ; or that of quilted
stuff, still worn by some of the Arab tribes. Except in some
very isolated cases we shall meet with no armour in England
earlier than the first half of the 13th century — complete chain
without any vestige of plate, and from that date our study of the
subject may well be commenced.
Mediaeval armour as we find it sculptured in our churches may
be conveniently arranged in six divisions : —
1. Complete Mail 4. Complete Plate
2. Mixed Mail and Plate 5. Mail Skirt period
8. Camail (or Capmail) period 6. Taslet period
I. Complete Mail. — The period of Complete Mail may be said
roughly to be coeval with the Norman and early English periods
of architecture, the 11th, 12th, and 18th centuries, or from the
time of William I. to Edward I. inclusive. It must be here
4iS Clifton Antiquarian Club,
observed that the word "Mail" cannot properly be applied
to any but chmn armour. It is by no means unusual to find
in novels and even books of higher pretension a description
of a knight " clad in plate 7nail,'' or " sheathed in plate mail
from head to foot," (^hen plate armour is evidently intended),
who slowly enters the arena and challenges the whole of the
assembly to mortal combat. Not many years ago a famous
writer of fiction, well-known to most of you, but whose literary
productions at that time were, or at all events were supposed to
be, confined to much more prosaic subjects, described two suits of
armour, " on view in Clare street," as being of plate mail. I
entirely failed to convince him that this was an impossibility —
** chain mail " and " plate mail " was his idea of the distinction,
and nothing could shake it. " Mail," however, is derived from
the same root as the French m^ille, a stitch, mesh, or opening
in net work, and should never be applied to " plate armour."
With the armour of the period before King Henry III., we
have little to do. Examples anterior to that date may be found
on the seals of the various monarchs, of which a fine series may
be examined and compared at the library of the Guildhall in
London ; also in illuminations in books of the date, and in the
Bayeux tapestry. But of monumental effigies we find none in
England which can be clearly identified as being earlier than the
second quarter of the 13th century.
Armour anterior to that date consisted of a leather tunic or
** haqueton," over which was a hauberk of mail, which, in earlier
examples, clothes both legs and body in one piece, but later the
body only, the legs being protected by " chausses " fitting closely
and covering both feet and legs.
The helmet in the time of William I. was conical, somewhat
like a Chinese cap ; in the time of William II. a " nasal," or
bar running from the forehead to the end of the nose, was added
— this ** nasal " gradually developes into a complete faceguard,
the top of the helmet becomes flat instead of conical, and even-
tually the entire helmet takes the form of a small barrel with slits
for the eyes and nose. This, as an external protection or " tilting
helmet," as it is often termed, held its ground with slight modi-
fications up to the 14th century.
The early shields are of large size, kite shaped, or curved to-
wards the body; Subsequently the top is cut square instead of
MedicBvat Arniouy. 43
curved, and ultimately they become much reduced in size and
assume the ** heater " shape. The earliest known shield having
heraldic bearings is supposed to be that of the Earl of Essex, in
Temple church, London, the date assigned to which, is 1165,
but until a much later date the large majority of shields were
quite plain.
Perhaps the earliest specimen of armour on any sepulchral
monument in this part of England to which a 'po%\tive date can
be given is that on the tomb of Wm. Longespee, in Salisbury
cathedral ; to this the date of 1226 can be fixed by direct evidence.
At St. Mark's or the Mayor's chapel in Bristol, there is a very
early effigy attributed, probably correctly, to Maurice Berkeley de
Gaunt, the founder, who was buried there in 1280. He is repre-
sented in a hauberk, with sleeves covering the arms and hands,
and coif covering the head, all in one continuous piece, and
chausses covering the legs, the whole being of linked mail. There
is no admixture of plate whatever. The figure wears a long flowing
surcoat, open nearly to the waist, where it is secured by a broad
belt, from which depends diagonally by two straps, a broad heavy
sword, with cross hilt, the arms of the guard being slightly curved —
as is not unusual with early effigies — towards the point of the sword.
The figure is represented as crossed-legged, and as holding the
scabbard m his left hand, whUe he sheathes his sword with his
right. He does not carry a shield. On the heels are plain prick
spurs, i.e., spurs ending in a single point instead of a rowel.
Another early effigy Ues by the side of the former. It is sup-
posed to represent Eobert de Gournay, who died 1260, and from
the style of the armour this may well be the case. This effigy
is very similar to the former, but the sword and belts are much
lighter, and the coif is not continuous with the hauberk, but is
in the form of a flat circular cap or coif laced to the hauberk
above the ears. On the left arm is a curved kite-shaped shield,
but with the top straight. The hands are crossed, not folded,
over the heart.
It may be interesting here to notice the different modes in
which these early effigies are represented, sometimes as sheath-
ing the sword — it is usually described as drawing the sword, but it
is doubtful whether in every case sheathing is not the better
description — sometimes, and in later times usually, with the hands
raised as in prayer — occasionally, as in the case just mentioned,
44 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
\vith the hands croseed. The helmet is frequently removed and
used as a rest for the head — the hand coverings of mail are
thrown back, or the gauntlets of plate, used in later times, are
laid aside. In one early effigy, at Pershore Abbey, the collar or
neck of the hauberk is unlaced and thrown back. In every case
the aim seems to be to suggest by the whole attitude the idea so
well expressed by Sir Walter Scott in his ** Lady of the Lake."
'* Soldier rest, thy warfare o'or,
Sleep the sleep that kuows not breaking ;
Dream of battlefields no more ;
Days of danger, nights of waking.**
I am strongly inclined to think that the crossing of the legs, the
motive for which has been for so long a matter of controversy, is
simply a further development of the same idea of rest and repose.
The idea that persons were so represented because they were
Knights Templars, or had taken part in a crusade, has long since
been abandoned, as many represented with the legs crossed
certainly never either belonged to that order or joined in a
crusade, and in Ireland some female effigies are so represented.
On the other hand, many effigies which presumably represented
actual Templars or Crusaders have the legs straight. The idea
that the persons represented had, although not actual Crusaders,
taken a vow to join, or had assisted by money in the objects of
those expeditions, appears to be merely conjectural and founded
on no sufficient basis, but simply to be another instance of the
struggles which an idea, originally untenable, will still make for
existence.
About the year 1270 we find the first step towards plate armour,
the OenouiUeres, or knee-caps, as shewn in the effigy of Sir Roger
de Trumpington c. 1280, being the earliest of the series before
you. Originally it is probable that these were of thick leather,
but many are certainly of metal, and, in later instances, are
richly engraved. This effigy affords a very good and complete
specimen of the armour of this period, and special attention
should be directed to the helmet, used as a pillow, which is
secured to the sword belt by a chain, and also to the shoulders,
from which rise the ailettes or wings, on which are emblazoned
the arms of the wearer, the two trumps on a field semee of
crosdets (Trumpington). The same arms appear on the shield,
Mediceval Armour. 45
and also on small escutcheons on the scabbard of the sword.
From illuminations of the period the ailettes would appear to
have been fixed at right angles to, and not parallel with, the
shoulders; but on an incised plate they could not readily be
shewn in such a position.
II. — So far we may be said to have been considering the period
of mail virtually complete ; but about the beginning of the 14th
century the plate makes rapid strides. The mail shirt, &c., are
worn as before, but additional defences are put on over them. The
arms from shoulder to elbow are protected by " demi brassarts," and
from front of elbow to wrist by " vamhraces ;** the front of the shins
by ^'jambarts.'' Frequently also the feet are covered with scales
of plate in the fashion of the tail of a lobster, and the front of
the shoulders and the bend of the elbows are protected by disks
or small circular shields, to which the name of ^^ palettes'* or
** roundels " has been given. In later instances a more ornamental
form is given to these — in the case of Sir John de Creke (c 1325)
at Westley Waterless, the form is that of lion's faces or
masks.
About this date also the surcoat takes a very peculiar form
known as the " eyelash No doubt the long surcoat, originally
worn to prevent the heating of the armour from the rays of the
sun, was found very inconvenient on horseback, and some inno-
vator, wise in his generation, boldly cut away the front of the
skirt and reduced the remainder to less ample proportions.
The shield gradually becomes much smaller, and instead of its
former concave shape it assumes a flat or " heater " shape, so
called from the article of domestic utility, known as a "flat
iron."
III. — ^After 1870 the shield, as a piece of defensive armour,
will seldom be found on sepulchral effigies. The sleeves of the
hauberk are much shortened, and shew plate armour beneath
protecting the lower arm. We then enter the " Camail Period,'
of which there are numerous specimens in our Cathedral.
It may be said to be coeval with the Decorated or Edwardian
period of architecture. The Coif de Mailles, or chain armour
covering the upper part of the head, disappears, and is replaced
by a conical helmet, or scull cap of plate, called a ^^ Basdnet.''
This is pointed, and in early cases sometimes fluted. The tilting
helmet was worn over this, but practically is never seen on early
46 Clifton Antiquarian Club,
monumental effigies, except used as a pillow. From the edge of
the bascinet depends a curtain or cape of mail, from which the
name of "camai7," ("cap," or "cape" mail) is derived. It is
attached to the bascinet by a cord runniag through rings, and
frequently with a small tassel at each end. In early examples
this cord and rings are plainly seen, but soon after 1880 it will be
found that the cord is concealed, a pipe or groove being provided
at the edge of the bascinet through which the cord runs. It has
been suggested, with great probability, that the cord when
exposed was liable to be cut by sword or lance, and that therefore
the additional protection was provided. This is one of the small
l)oints to which particular attention should be given in attempting
to determine the date of an effigy in this class of armour. Very
soon after the commencement of this style the surcoat disappears,
and is replaced by a closely fitting sleeveless garment, extending
from the shoulders and covering the hips, to which the name of
'*Jupon** has been given. This garment was made of velvet,
silk, or stuff, and was frequently embroidered with the arms of
the wearer, thus being literally a " coat of arms," and no doubt
the origin of this term. In early examples, the lower border of
the Jupon is simply escalloped, but gradually the border becomes
much more enriched, and about 1895 to 1405 is often of a rich
vine leaf or other floriated pattern. Below the Jupon can usually
be seen the fringed edge of the mail shirt worn beneath it. During
the early part of the Camail period the legs are often protected
by "banded" or "studded" armour, the plate or cuir-bonlli
(leather) of which the ground work was composed being concealed
by velvet or other stuffs, secured to it by large round-headed
studs or by longitudinal bands of metal, which, themselves, must
have greatly added to its strength. The Genouilleres or knee-
caps not infrequently resemble pot-lids, and sometimes star-like
rays or points project below them as in one of the examples now
before you.
The sword-belt during the camail period is almost invariably
worn straight across the hips. It is broad and generally riclily
jewelled. In» some monuments actual jewels are known to have
been inserted, but, naturally, the sockets are all that now remain.
This hip-belt is characteristic of the age, and will be found not
only on military effigies but on those of civiUans, both male and
female, of the 14th century. On the left side is suspended a
J
■
■
iii
•i
MedicBval Armour. 47
sword, and on the right a dagger, the former invariably, and the
latter usually, hanging quite perpendicularly. On visiting the
little church of Rodney Stoke, near . Cheddar, a short time since,
I noticed that the local stone mason, who was employed to restore
an effigy of one of the Rodney family of somewhat later date,
had substituted a second sword on the right side for the dagger
which no doubt formerly existed there. The effect is peculiar.
Probably when the stone has mellowed by age in the course of a
few centuries, it may be instanced by our New Zealand successors
as a unique example of the very early influence of Japanese art
on English manners and customs ; or, on the other hand, it may
be pointed out to a Society of Antiquarians that " two sworded
men " were not confined to that Eastern nation.
IV. Complete Plate. — About 1410-15 a further change is
developed. The camail is covered by a ** gorget " of jointed over-
lapping plates. The jupon is abandoned, and the lower part of
the body armour consists of several rows of overlapping plates
called ** a skirt qftaces'' There is no doubt indeed that this form
of skirt replaced the mail shirt at an earlier period, although the
jupon which covered it prevents the alteration from being readily
noticed. In the northern Chantry chapel at Chew Magna, which
the club recently visited, is the effigy of Sir John St. Loe, about
1440, habited in a skirt of taces covered by a jupon. The taces
appear clearly at the sides at the lacing of the jupon. Additional
pointed plates are added on the breast, others of the same
description above and below the knee, and gauntlets of plate
having pointed cuffs protect the hands. During the whole of the
full plate period the rest or socket for the end of the spear is
often represented on monuments, screwed into the right breast. In
the early part of the century the bascinet or headpiece was pointed
as in the camail period ; but the point became gradually less
acute, and ultimately the bascinet was globular. Except in very
early examples the sword belt (which is narrow) crosses the body
diagonally. A dagger is usually worn on the right side affixed,
not to the sword belt, but apparently to the lower plate of the
skirt of taces. The date 1430 to 1450 may be named as the
culminating period of armour — full plate, of fairly Ught, and so
far as compatible with the nature of the metal and the object to
which it was applied, of a graceful form. The superior workman-
ship and artistic qualities observable in monuments, both in stone
48 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
and bntss. of this period* do not. to 9Ay the least, detrart from
the effect referred to.
Then, after the middle of the 15th eentnry, there is an altera-
tion for the worse. Piece after piece is added to the armour :
those pieces become of greater weight, and are clomsr both in
form and s^»pearance. The '^ panldnjH* *' or pieces protecting the
shoulders are freqoently doubled, are of great thieknesSy and
sometimes of different shapes on the right and lefk, the one on
the left shoulder being raised on the apper edge so as to form a
protection to the head and neck on that side.
The necessary consequence of the additional weight of Armour
added for the protection of the upper part of the body was that
an equivalent weight had to be saved elsewhere. So, before the
improvement in the manufacture of torpedoes, we endeavoured to
proWde for additional armour on the more exposed parts of ships of
war by leaving the parts below the waterUne unarmoured. We
find therefore, that about 1440-5 the lower plate of the skirt of
taees was replaced by two short hinged plates of 4 or 5 inches
width, one in front of each leg, known as '* TuUles" These
gradually became longer; the skirt of taces proportionately
shorter, and a skirt of mail over which the tmlles hung took
little by little the place of the former plates. The pauldrons and
elbow pieces continued in many eases to be of enormous weight ;
the latter are often shaped almost like the iron caps of the Civil
War period. The armour for the feet consists of numerous over-
lapping plates, and later examples are rounded and of excessive
breadth at the toes. After 1460 the head is more usually
represented as bare — the hair up to about 1470 is cut short,
api)earing almost like a wig round the head — subsequently it is
long and flowing. The helmet, on which the head generally rests,
is globular, with a beaked \'isor in early, and a rounded one in
later examples. Sometimes — especially in late examples, a
helmet is found with longitudinal bars instead of a visor.
In the latter part of the 15th and early part of the 16th cen-
turies a " tabard,'* or square coat with square sleeves emblazoned
with the arms of the owner, and similar to that still worn by
heralds, is often found. In the early part of the 16th century
four tuilles, two in front and two on the sides, are also occasionally
met with. After the first quarter of the 16th century the edge of
the skirt of mail is not infrequently indented, and the armour
Mediceval Armour. 49
bordered with a studded or rivetted edge of about fin. in width.
A collar or curtain of mail sometimes hangs from the helmet, at
other times the gorget of plate is absent, and a mail collar
appears in its place.
About 1570 the mail skirt disappears. The enormous stuffed
trunk hose or breeches then worn rendered a modification of the
armour necessary, and the " tuiUez " develope into " tadeU ** of
jointed plates covering the front of the thighs. At first the shape
of the taslets was generally square with a narrow straight border,
but before the end of the century the ends became oval and the
edges are invected. The pauldrons or shoulder-pieces are very
large and consist, like the taslets, of numerous overlapping plates
with invected edges and curved to fit the shoulder and upper part
of the breast ; while the lower edge of the breastplate assumes a
more pointed form. The modern guard to the sword first appears
about 1600.
After 1680 armour below the knee is seldom seen, being re-
placed by large high boots. The taslets become longer, ending
in a curved piece covering the knee. The plates of which both
taslets and pauldrons are composed become smaller and more
numerous.
The next change involves the almost entire disappearance of
armour. The taslets and pauldrons are gone — a " buff coat " of
thick leather under breast and back plates (similar to those
still worn, for parade purposes only, by our Life and Horse
Guards and the French Cuirassiers) and the hehnet of ridged
form with a brim somewhat like that of a modem hat, well
known from engravings of the time of the Covenanters, alone
remain. Then these disappear ; and the last vestige of mediaeval
armour, the gorget, in the form of small narrow plates of metal
in front of the neck, still worn by French commissioned officers,
is to be seen on the Brass of George Hodges c. 1680 at Wedmore.
He wears large bucket boots with rowelled spurs attached by
large leathers, laced breeches, buff coat fastened down the front
with laces tied in bows, the sleeves beiug apparently attached to
the coat in the same manner ; the gorget referred to ; laced collar
and cuffs turned back over the coat and a sash round the waist
tied on the left side. A diagonal belt supports a long straight
sword with hilt of modem form. The hair is long and curling,
and he wears a pointed beard and moustache. In the
4
50 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
right hand is a spear or javelin about 6ft. long with tasselled
head.
We have thus traced so far as we can within the space per-
mitted, the rise, progress, and decay of MedisBval Armour, Those
who wore it, and who often in their time did good service to this
the realm of England, are long since gone from amongst us.
'< The Knights are dust,
Their good swords rast,
Their souls are with the Saints we trust,"
but who dares to say that the age of Chivalry is past. We now
put the armour on our ships and on our fortresses ; but our men,
whether of knightly degree or of more lowly birth, fight the
battles of their common country on one common ground of duty
and of danger. But the hearts of our soldiers beat as true behind
the red coat as ever they did behind the Damascened breastplate,
and tales of even truer chivalry could be told — aye and will
be told — of Eorke's Drift, of Afghanistan and of Egypt, than of
Cressy and Poictiers, of Evesham or of Agincourt. And we
of this generation who have Chard, Beresford, Roberts, still
happily preserved to us ; and the heroes Eyre, Earle, and Stewart
fallen on the field, we cannot say of glory, but of duty ; aoid last,
the glorious name of Gordon — ^a name of which Englishmen will
be proud until England and time shall be no more — ^need not go
back to the Middle Ages for incentives to valour ; and something
better than valour. " A gentle Knight and true ; " the highest
praise of our forefathers — ^may it not truly be said of all these ?
Ancient Bristol Documents. 5 1
^nmnt Bristol Comments;.
No. I.
By Liiut.-Ool. JAMES R. BRAMBLE, Treasubib.
{Read November 12/A, 1884.)
Bristol Local Act of Parliament passed during the Pro-
tectorate FOR LEVYING BaTES FOR MAINTENANCE OF MINISTERS
AND GRANTING St. EwEN's GhURCH FOR A PUBLIG LIBRARY.
Notes.
[The Act of Parliament of which a copy is here given contains
information which, while it is valuable to the student of Bristol
history, is not without a more extended interest.
The provision for levying a rate of Is. 6d. in the pound on *' the
rent or true yearly values of all houses/* &c., and of 6s. " for
every one hundred pound stock employed in trade *' for '' the
more frequent preaching of the gospel and better maintainance
of the ministers," a£f6rds a striking evidence of the difference
in the views of the Nonconformists of that and the present date
as to the duties of the State with respect to religion. But in
the time of the Commonwealth the form of religion accepted by
the State was not that of the Church of Englaoid.
It appears by the memoranda at the end that this Act was
passed at the request of the Corporation for the purpose of
remedying defects in a former Act which had proved unworkable,
and from some of the enactments it would seem that difficulties
had arisen, or were apprehended, in getting parties to accept
the duties which were sought to be imposed upon them ; and for
this reason not only the members of the Corporation generally,
but also their officials were authorised to act in case of need, and
the quorum was reduced from nine to seven.
52 Cliftofi /intiquarian Club.
The enactments with respect to '' St. Owin's/' otherwise
"Audoen's" Church, are of special interest. This church,
called in more modem times St. Ewen's, stood almost exax^tly in
the business centre of the city at the comer of C!om and Broad
streets, on the site now occupied by the Council house. We are
told by Wm. Wyrcestre {DaUaway^ p. 118), that the church of
the parish of St. Audoen, with the chapel of the *Fratemity, in
honour of St. John the Baptist, stood in a direct line between
the church of St. Werburg (which church lately stood on the east
side of the Commercial Booms at the comer of Com and Small
streets, and was taken down in 1878 to widen those streets), on
the west, and '' Bradstrete " on the east, and that the great east
window stood " super stratum Bradstrete.'*
In pages 96-7 this church is quaintly described as consisting of
a nave on the north side of an aisle — ^habet unam navem ecclesiae
ex parte boreali alae — and one aisle — alam vel elam — which was
the chapel of St. John the Baptist and of the Fraternity. In
p. 144 the chapel is stated to have been on the south side. It is
evident, therefore, that it stood next to Com street, with the nave
on its inner side.
At the same page it is also stated that the length of the church
of " Seynt Ewen id est Sancti Adoen " was " 22 virgas ; " the
breadth '* 15 virgas " by measurement or " 30 gressus." Wm.
Wyrcestre's " gressus ** appears to have been 20 inches, and this
would make the entire church about 78 feet in length by 50 in
breadth.
But it was not the entirety of the church which was granted
for a Public Library. The chantry of St. John appears to have
been amongst those suppressed by Henry the YIII., as stated
by Barrett (History of Bristoly 'p. 477). The old chapel in St.
Ewen's church in 1551, 4th of Edward VI., was granted by the
parson and parishioners with all their right and title to the Mayor
and commonalty of Bristol ; and the Corporation erected on the
site a Council house with a shed before it covered with lead, and
supported by five stone pillars. This would have reduced the
width of the church by probably some 20 or 25 feet, but would
have left the nave of some 70 feet by 25 to 80 feet, in a situation
* NoTB. — Much information with respect to this ancient Gaild wiU be found in
the valuable work by our vioe-preeident, Mr. Alderman Fox, on " The Merchant
Taylors of Bristol."
Ancient Bristol Documents. 53
which was perhaps the most valuable which could have been
selected for the purpose intended, and could hardly now be
improved upon.
But it does not appear that the intended conversion into a
library was ever carried into effect, and St. Ewen's remained as
an Ecclesiastical edifice until 1787. An Act was then passed for
taking down the church and attaching the parish to that of
Christ church, instead of All Saints', as was provided for by the
Act of Cromwell.
Under the Act of 1787, St. Ewen's was pulled down, and the
site, together with that of the old Council house (which had been
rebuilt in 1704), were again united; and form the site of the
present Council house, opened in 1827. Some stone carvings,
found in removing the foundation, were removed to " Broom well,"
Brislington, then the residence of the late Mr. Braikenridge,
where they are still, I have been told, built into one of the boun-
dary walls.
It should be remarked that the City Library had been founded
in Bristol as early as 1618 — 43 years before the passing of the
Act granting St. Ewen's. On the 6th December of that year, the
Council agreed " that if Mr. Redwode will give his Lodge adjoin-
" ing the Town Wall, neere the Marsh of Bristol, to the Mayor,
" and commonalty to be converted to a Librarye, or place to put
^' books for the furtherance of learninge, then the same shall be
'' thankfully accepted, and that such bookes as shall be given to
" the citie by the reverende father in God the Lord Archbishop of
" York, or any other well disposed person, for the furnishing of a
"librarye, shall be thankfully accepted and preserved in the
" place aforesaid." Mr. Redwode gave his " Lodge " and the Bristol
Library came into existence. The house was rebuilt on the same
site in 1740, and continues to be the central Bristol Public
Library to this day. Long may it continue to flourish under the
able care of our friend and associate Mr. John Taylor.
It is somewhat singular that no tradition even should have
exiJBted that St. Ewen's had been at one time granted for the pur-
pose of a Library, but until the writer's accidental discovery of
the document under consideration the fact appears to have
entirely escaped notice.]
54 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
At the Parliament begun
ai Westminster^ 17th
of September^ 1656.
AN ACT for explayninge a former Act off Parlia
ment made for more frequent preachinge of the
Gospell and maintaynance off ministers in the
Cytty of Bristolly and for supplying certaine
defects in the said former Act.
THE LORD PROTECTOR doth consent :
Let this Bill be presented to the Lord Protector
for his consent.
Wheabas by a late Act off Parliament, bearinge date the first
day off April], in the yeare off our Lord Gk)d one thousand six
hundred and fifty, intituled an Act for the more frequent preach-
inge of the Gospell and better maintaynance of the ministers
within the Cytty of Bristoll, the Mayor and Sherifes of the said
Cytty, for the time beinge, and severall other prticular psons,
or any nine of them (callinge to theire Assistants three Inhabit-
ants off each pish), are authorised and ympowered to tax, rate,
and Asseass a certaine sum uppon the rents or true yearely
values of all Houses, Shops, Warehouses, Cellars, Stubbes, and
Tenements not exceedinge one shUlinge sixpence yearely in the
pound, and five shillings yearely for every hundred pound Stock
ymployed in Trade by any pson or psons within the said Cytty
and Liberties thereoff. Be it enacted by his Highnes the Lord
Protector and this present Parliament, and by the Authority
thearoff, that it shall and may be lawfuU to and for the sd
Mayor, Sherifes, and the sd p'ticular psons named and appoynted
to make the sd Asseassment in the sd fformer Act or any nine off
them under thire hands and seales to nominate and appoynt a
Treasurer, Collector, or Collectors for the coUectinge and re-
ceivinge of all such some and sommes of mony as shal be taxed,
rated, and asseased, by virtue of this or the said recited Acte of
Parliament and from time to time to call them to an Accompt,
remove or displace them, and allow them Sallories as they or any
nine of them shall think fitt. And if any Cittisen, Burgess or
Tenant or occupier or aoiy other pson or psons inhabitinge within
the sd Cytty shall refuse or neglect to pay any sume or sumes
Ancient Bristol Documents. 55
off mony taxed rated or asseased upon them or any off them by
virtue of this or the sd recited Act and accordinge to the trew
meaninge thearoff, That then it shall and may be lawfull to and
for the sd Collector or Collectors (after demand off such rate and
tax by such Collector or Collectors who are hearby authorized
thearabouts) to levy the some or somes so taxed, rated and
asseased as aforesaid by distress and sale of the goods off such
pson so refusinge or neglectinge to pay the same, deductinge the
sume asseased and reasonable charges of distrayninge and restore
the overpluss to the Owner thearoff, or otherwise if any pson or
p'sons so to be asseased shall refuse or neglect to pay the sd tax
or asseasment within six daies after demand thearoff made by the
said Collector or Collectors such p'son or p'sons so refusinge or
neglectinge shall forfeit the double value off the said tax or
asseasment to be sued for and recovered in the name of the said
Treasurer in an Action of debt in any Court of Record in the sd
Cytty wh. said Court or Courts of Record are hearby authorized
and ympowered to have Jurisdiction cognizance and to hould plea
thereoff to all intents and purposes whatsoever All wh. said
Rates and Asseasments soe made as aforesd shall stand good and
be effectuall from time to time untill uppon complaint or proof of
some irregularity or inequalUty thearin, to the Justices off the
Peace at the generall Sessions of the Peace within the sd Cytty,
the said Justices shall see cause to alter the same. And if the sd
Justices shall see cause to alter it, then the said rate with such
alteration as shalbe made by them shall stand and be off full
fforce And be it also enacted by the authority aforesaid That in
case the Inhabitants of such pish wh. are to be called to be
Assistants to the sd Mayor Sheriffes and pticular psons ympow-
ered by the said recited Act for the ratings and asseasings as
aforesaid shall refuse or neglect to come and give assistaunce
accordingly, that then it shall and may be lawful for the said
Mayor Sherifes and pticular psons to proceede without them And
be it further enacted by the authority aforesaid that in case the
said Mayor Sherifes and pticular psons ympowered by this and the
said recited Acte of Parliament should happen to dye refuse or
neglect to act, and thereuppon no sufficient number to be left to
execute the powers hearin and thearby given and granted That
then it shall and may be lawfull to aoid for the Mayor Recorder
Aldermen, Sherifes, Townclerke, Steward, Comon Counsell and
56 Cliftofi Antiquarian Club.
Ctiambeilains of the Cvtty for the time being or aay Sexen (^
them from time to time to pat in executim all and eTery the
charges powers and authorities given and granted in and by this
and the sd recited Act off Parliament onto the sd MaycH* Sherifes
and pticnlar psons or any nine of them in the same and in as
large and ample manner and forme to all intents, purposes and
constructions whatsoever any thinge in this or the before recited
Acte of Parliament to the contrary in anjrwise notwithstand-
inge. And wheareas there is acertaine Pish Church within the
said Cytty called by the name off St. Owins ortherwise Andoens wh.
for the smalnes off it and little use made thearoff may be conve-
niently miited to the Pish Church off All S^ beinge very fitt
and near therabuts And the said Pish Chnrch of St Owinge
lx;inge very convenient to be converted into a Comon and Pubik
Librerary for the use of the said Cytty Be it also enacted by the
Authority aforesaid, That if (mc) it shall and may be lawfnll to
and for the pson or psons named and appoynted to make the said
Asseasments by virtue of this and the said recited Act aecordinge
to the powers thearin lymitted to take order that the same church
of St Owens be converted and ymployed to and for a Publik
Library within the said Cytty.
HEN. 8C0BELL, Clerk off the ParliamenU.
At an Assembly off the Mayor Aldermen and Comon
Counsell held the Seconde day off January, 1656.
Wheareas formerly theare was an Act of Parliamt made for
the maintaynance of preachinge ministers in Bristoll since which
sever all off the Commissioners thearein named are dead, whearby
and for some other defects thearin the sd Act is become impracti-
cable, it is now thought fitt and ordered that Mr Aldworth
Burgess in Parliament with the advice and Assistance off Mr
Ald'man Joseph Jackson now in London be desired on the behalfe
of the Corporation to doe his best endeavours to obtaine aai Act
off this present Parliament for the maintaynance off the said
ministers, wheareby the defects in the last Act may be supplied
(iff possible) , that the Mayor Aldermen and Comon Counsell off
this Cytty may have the like powers and authorities committed
to them as by the former Act was given to the sd Commis-
sioners.
The XXVIIth off October 1657.
It is ordered that Coppies of the Act of Parliament be sent to
Ancient Bristol Documents, 57
the Church-Wardens of every pish to be communicated to the
respective Vestries and the severall Churchwardens doe one Friday
the 6th day oflf November next by two off the Clock in the after-
noone attend at the Comon Counsel! house and theare give an
accompt of theire procedinge in making the rate for the maintay-
nance off ministers according to a former Act of Comon
Counsell.
ALDWORTH.
ffor the Churchwardens off
the Pish off St John Baptist.
[The copy is made on three sheets of Foolscap, on which,
besides the usual horizontal and perpendicular wire marks, is the
water mark I H S, with a cross bottonee standing on the hori-
zontal stroke of the H. In the same line, but rather smaller,
BINAV.]
58 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Between 36at]^ anln Caer^mt.
Bt a. T. martin, M.A.
{Read December I5th, 1885.)
My present remarks will be confined to that part of the XlVth
Iter in the Antonine Itinerary, that lies or seems to lie between
Bristol and Oaerwent. This Iter, which is sometimes called the
Via Julia — a name which, however, has no earlier authority than
the 18th century — ^makes the stages and distances as follows : —
from Venta Silurum or Caerwent to Abone, 9 miles; Abone
to Trajectus, 9 miles ; and Trajectus to Bath, 6 miles — or 24
miles in all. It has been very forcibly pointed out in a paper by
our esteemed President in the Bristol and Gloucestershire ArchsBO-
logical Society's Transactions (Vol. III. pp. 83-89) that this
total distance of 24 miles necessitates a pretty straight road from
Bath to Caerwent. Bishop Clifford in this paper gives us a very
salutary caution against the impropriety of needlessly altering
the distances of our authorities to siiit our theories, and I shall
therefore assume that the route we are considering must have
been from Caerwent to Sudbrooke, then to somewhere at the
mouth of the Avon ; then past Bristol to Bitton, and so to Bath.
For this is the only route that will even approximately fit the
distances in the Itinerary. My object to-night is twofold, (1) to
bring forward some additional evidence in favour of the route
past Sudbrooke, (2) to revive the old theory of Seyer that Sea
Mills is the site of Abona.
In the paper already alluded to, there are some interesting
remarks on the alteration in the bed of the Severn, and a map,
which is coloured so as to show what is in all probability the
ancient bed of the river. It seems that the waters of the Severn at
On ike kotnan Road. 59
one time washed the foot of the hills from Portbory to Aust. The
same paper points out that on the western side of the river the
contrary prooees has been going on — ^probably half at least of the
camp at Sudbrooke having been washed away by the river. But
this process of denudation was, it seems to me, limited to a very
small area. Sudbrooke suffered because it was a cape or head-
land receiving the full force of the water coming through the
shoots. Westward of this, the process has been exactly the
same as on our side of the river. Seyer states that there was a
tradition that the ships in old times used to go right up to Oaer-
went : whether this was so or not we cannot teU, but if we con-
sider the levels of the ground between Galdecott and Portskewett
it seems pretty clear that there was here a wide estuary, extend-
ing at least up to Galdecott, if not further, of which Galdecott
and Portskewett Pills are now the only traces. It seems, more-
over, pretty safe to conclude that the Bomans would have
chosen such an estuary as this as a landing place in preference
to any spot on the open shore. My theory, therefore, . is that
from Gaerwent the route lay along a road through Galdecott to
somewhere about Deep Weir, and that at this spot, or near this
spot, was the actual place of embarkation. On the 25-inch map
of Galdecott Parish, the remains of a road, called the Portway,
are shown. This road, if continued, would enter Galdecott a Uttle
west of the cross-roads. Isaac Taylor points out that Galdecott
is exactly equivalent in meaning to Gold Harbour : this, if cor-
rect, would be additional evidence in favour of this route. The
camp at Sudbrooke would, on this theory, have been a gar-
risoned port protecting the mouth of the harbour, which would
have been amply protected on the land side by the neighbourhood
of so strong a place as Gaerwent.
I must now call your attention to the opposite side of the
Trajectus. Assuming that the Bomans embarked here, the ques-
tion is — where did they land ? That it was somewhere near the
mouth of the Avon is clear, I think, from the considerations of
distance before mentioned. I venture to suggest that it caoi have
been at no other place than somewhere in the mouth of the
Avon. Just as at Butupiae in Kent, the spot chosen for the land-
ing station was on the side of a river or estuary ; so here, I think,
the probability is all in favour of the Bomaois having chosen some
such sheltered spot in preference to any place like that at the
6o Clifton Antiquarian Club.
foot of Blaize Castle, where the ships would have been exposed to
all the dangers of storm and currents; and would, moreover,
have had no better protection from hostile attack than would be
afforded by a camp in their rear. If the landing place was at
Sea Mills, the camps on Eingsweston and Blaize Castle hills
would have, I think, a much better strategical meaning than they
would on any other theory.
It is, I believe, generally admitted that the Bomans occupied
the camp at Sea Mills ; but I shall, nevertheless, put very briefly
before you the arguments on which this admission rests, not
because they require additional evidence, but because I think
their bearing and importance have not been suflSciently
estimated.
These arguments are twofold, (1) the name, (2) the remains.
As to the first of these, it is only necessary to remind you that
the fields in the neighbourhood were, according to Seyer, in his
time, called the Portburies,* and that the older name seems to
have been Portchester. This last name would pretty certainly
imply a fortified port of some importance. As to the second argu-
ment, the remains, I shall pass over coins, as they have been
found in so many locahties, that they afford us no direct help.
But Barret (" Bristol " p. 12) tells us that in making the Sea
Mills Dock in the year 1712 — " They also met with a fine
arched gateway underground in digging out the dock at its upper
part, which seems to have led to some principal part : and the
rudera of buildings destroyed, and remains of old foundations
have been traced up the adjoining hilly ground next the river
side. Seyer states {Memoirs of Bristoly vol. I. p. 156), " Many
thick flat tiles are often found here in the walls and foundations,
having grooves on one side ; apparently intended as bricks for
building: some have been in my own possession. These are
certainly Boman, such being found in other Boman stations."!
* I recently met two old residents at Seft MiUs, who told me thev distinctly re-
membered some of the fields there being caUed '*the Polborvs," but they were
unable to poiut them out, and no such names are now in use there.
A. E. H.
to. W. Manby, inhis *' Fugitive Sketches/' published Jan. 1802, writing of the
"grand naval magazine of the Romans " at Sea Mills, states (p. 18) : — *' Coins are
found to this day, fragments of urns, scorious relics of iron ore, called Roman cin-
ders, and bricks, S^in. in length, 4|in. in breadth, and lin. thick, aU being scribed
down on one side. These are in my possession, which I principally found in a
field called the Three-acres, where many had been turned up in pfoaghing." —
At Ml. a.
On the Roman Road. 6i
This, I take it, is a statement of the utmost importance. Nowhere
else, I believe, in the neighbourhood have there been found any
remains of buildings. And the conclusion that may be drawn
from this is that here at Sea Mills there was a landing place and
port of some considerable importance ; and further, that this was
the eastern terminus of the traject — as it is hardly likely that a
port of this kind existing, there should be any other landing
place of importance in the immediate vicinity.
I shall now, with your permission, direct your attention to the
remains of the camp as existing (1) in Beyer's time ; (2) at the
present time. On the plan accompanying this paper, which is a
reduced copy of the Ordnance Map on the 25-inch scale, is a
tracing of Seyer's plan of the camp. The dimensions are given
as about 50 acres. Wright gives the area of Bichborough as
4 acres, Lymne 12 acres, Kenchester 21 acres, and Sil-
chester as 120 acres. These figures show that the station must
have been one of some considerable importance. Seyer's plan
appears not to be correct as to the points of the compass, but it is
inserted here so as to as nearly as jfossible correspond with the true
directions of the Trim and the Avon. On Seyer's plan may be
seen a mound running all round — ^two bastions which I have
marked A and B. — Sneed Park House and Little Sneed, immedi-
ately above it. The point marked C is, as nearly as possible,
above the present lodge at the foot of the Mariners' Path. The
black lines inside the mound in Seyer's plan seem to be hedge-
rows. They remain now very much as they were then, except
that stone walls have, in some cases, taken the place of hedge-
rows. Mr. Hudd has very kindly accompanied me in a visit of
inspection to the camp. We found that the greater part of
Seyer's plan can even now be identified.
From the foot bridge over the railway to the point marked A,
the mound still exists, and is very strongly marked. At A the
bastion may still be seen. Between A and B the mound has
been totally destroyed, possibly in order to give the house an
uninterrupted view over the river. At B there appears to be the
second bastion, and immediately beyond this there is another at
a spot marked with a cross, which does not appear in Seyer's
plan. From this point to C there are no traces of the mound.
But on the east side, on the right of the road leading to the
bridge over the Trim, the fall to the level of the stream in Sea
66 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
that even if I have not estabUshed my point, I have said
suflScient to revive an interest in Sea Mills and possibly to
stimulate our local antiquaries to fresh investigations, and I hope
to new and important discoveries. ^
Note. — Since reading the paper, Mr. Hudd and myself have
examined a small collection of various objects that have been «
found in the fields, either within the station or in the immediate
neighbourhood. This collection consists of some broken pieces
of Samian ware [potter's marks on two pieces, F. PVDEN and
OP. CAIVI C? CALVI),] pieces of coarse ware, fibulae, beads,
coins and tesserae of a pavement.
Proceedings, 1884-5. ^7
1884-5.
MEETINGS AND EXCURSIONS.
The proceedings at the first meeting, held January 23rd, 1884, have
already been printed. On the conclusion of Mr. Taylor's paper on
Norman doorways some discussion took place.
Mr. T. S. Pope remarked that in Norman times the great monasteries
formed centres of art, or possibly colleges of workmen, which influenced
the architecture in the surroimding districts. For instance, Malmesbur^'
Abbey seems to have influenced not only all the early work in that part
of Wilts, but places as far distant as Stanton and Kempsford; and
Glastonbury had influence in South Wales, and Gloucestershire, as
at St. David's, Llandaff, and Slymbridge. In the church at the place last
named is a doorway very like one in ** St. Joseph's Chapel." Possibly the
workmen passed into Wales from Glastonbury, by way of Gloucestershire,
working on the way. llie circular-headed early arches in Oldbury
Church point to the same conclusion. The interesting Norman doorway
at Ditteridge seems to have been imitated from Roman work, and it is
possible even that the great western archways at Tewkesbury may have
been suggestec^ by Koman work then remaining in that neighbourhood.
Mr. W. E. Jones thought there was little doubt that much of the
early Norman work was built by Saxon masons working under Norman
tuition. Upon careful examination of the architectural remains of the
Norman period, we find evidences of thought on the part of the designer
in the planning or working out the general distribution of parts or
grouping, whilst the details are feeble ; in other cases we find the general
arrangement shewing little power; but, evidently a master hand has
appeared on the scene before the work was completed, and to a certain
extent redeemed its character by the great beauty and power in the
finishing or carving and ornamentation ; or perhaps he has bestowed all
his art power upon one of those beautiful porches or doorways described
by Mr. Taylor. In a progressive art like architecture, it is difficult to
give a precise date when one style ceased and another began. In sonie
phases of architectural art it took centuries to shake off we forms and
traditions of one style and adopt those of another, and between the two a
variety of most curious and interesting features are to be obser^'ed, which
taken by themselves are entirely misleading, but when associated with
and traced back to the previous, and forward to the succeeding styles,
enable us better to understand what style in architecture really means.
Mr. S. H. Swayne, Mr. H. Lewis, Mr. A. T. Martin, and' Mr. A. E.
Hudd took part in the discussion.
68 Clifton /Antiquarian Club.
THE FIKST EXCURSION
took place on Wednesday, May 29 th, 1884, when about thirty members
and friends accompanied the President (Bishop Clifford), to Ashton,
Barrow Gumey, Chew Magna, Stanton Drew, &c. Starting from Clifton
on a beautiful May morning, and pas*«ing the remains of the three ancient
camps at Clifton, Burwalls, and Ashton, and through Ashton Park, the
first halt was made at
Ashton Court,
where in the absence of Sir Greville and Lady Smyth , the members were
received by Mr. William Dyke, who conducted them over the most
interesting portions of the mansion. Some fragments of the 15th
century house of the Ashton Lyons family still remain, but have mostly
been covered up and altered during various reconstructions, especially
in that under Inigo Jones, about 1634. The interesting collection
of pictures having been examined, Mr. Dyke led the way across the Park
to
Long Ashton Church,
a fifteenth century building, dedicated to All Saints, which was con-
siderably *' restored" in 1871, under Mr. Ferrey, when the chancel and
the greater portion of the north wall of the nave were rebuilt. There is
a good, square, perpendicular tower at the west end (a sketch of which
by Mr. Paul, is given on the plate) : this was probably built by Sir Thomas
De Lyons, whose arms — a chevron between three lions couchant — still
remain on a shield over the west window. This family came into
possession of the Ashton estate temp. Edward I, and in the north porch
are two effigies (figured in Mr. R. W. Paul's Sepulchral Slabs of N, W.
Somersety pi. 9), supposed to represent two male members of that family
of the early part of the 14th century. The Lyons arms also remain
among the beautiful fragments of stained glass, now in the south window
of the chancel. The chief feature of the interior of the church is
the handsome chancel screen of carved oak, richly colored and gilt.
Though the present colours are said to be accurately copied irom
the old ones, the effect of the restoration has given this fine screen such
a very modem look that it has certainly lost somewhat in its effect.
In the north aisle, the interesting monument to Sir Richard and Lady
Choke, c. 1486, was examined, and here a paper was read by Mr. John
Price, of Ashton, on the Choke family, and their connexion with the
parish. Sir Richard Choke, Kt., though never " Lord Chief Justice
of England,'* as described by Collinson {vol. 2. p, 291), and other writers,
was a most distinguished man, who was made by King Edward IV., in
1461, one of the Justices of the Common Pleas, which office he retained
till his death, in the first \ear of King Richard III.
Ashton Cross,
erected in the 14th centun*, recentlv removed from the roadside near the
Angel Inn, and re-erected in the churchyard to the south-west of the
church, was next inspected. Ti)is is the only one remaining of the seven
crosses mentioned by Pooley (Crosses of Somerset^ pp. 117, 118), as
l.MijA^U'M^Cbxirck .
, i.tUi-'-^Mi—--
Tii^^^^y^
Proceedings, 1884-5. 69
formerly standing in the parish. Bishop Clifford stated that the position
from which it had recently been moved was not its original site, and that
therefore its removal was not a matter of much consequence from an
antiquarian point of view. The large and ancient tithe-bam a short
distance to the south-west of the church was not visited, but it has
a good 1 5th century roof in excellent preservation, and is an interesting
example of its class. It is here figured from a sketch by Mr. Paul.
Barkow Gurnet Court
was next visited, by kind permission of the owner, Mr. H. M. Gibbs, who
having recently purchased the estate, is making extensive alterations and
repairs to this interesting mansion, which, soon after the suppression of
the Benedictine nunnery in 1536, was built on the site of the Priory
buildings by John Drew of Bristol, to whom the house and lands were
granted. The house is still, notwithstanding various alterations, a
fine specimen of the Elizabethan style, especially as regards its external
appearance, but considerable liberties have been taken with the internal
arraue:ement8 ; several richly decorated ceilings remain, and some old
carved mantel-pieces, with shields of arms of the Gores and other
families who have held the Manor. A view of the front of the house,
from a drawing by J. C. Buckler, was published in 1816, in Rutter's
Delineations, pi. 16; the original drawing is in the Smyth Pigott
collection, now in the Taunton Museum. Hardly any fragments are left
of the Benedictine priory foiinded here, about A.D. 1211. by one of the
Berkeley family, except a few walls, and some carved beams now in the
large tithe bam at the back of the Court.
A history of the priorv, by the Rev. Thomas H\)go, was published in
the 12th volume of the Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archmological
and Natural History Society.
Barrow Church,
dedicated to **St. Mary the Virgin and St. Edmimd the King," has
been rebuilt. It contains some old monimients, and a good 14th century
incised cross-slab, 5^ feet in length, which probably commemorates one
of the prioresses. Mr. R. W. Paul, who figures this cross in his
Sepulchral Slabs, pi. 13, was mistaken in supposing the blue colouring
to be original, it having been added by a late rector of the parish, who
coloured in a similar manner *'the elegant 15th century stoup, which
stands against the wall close by," in the porch. This stoup has nothing
to do either with the ancient priory, or the parish church, having been
taken to Barrow from Temple parish, Bristol, where it formerly stood.
The heraldic tiles and other remains recently discovered outside
the west end of the church having been covered up to protect them from
the weather, could not be examined, but as they had been seen by
several members of the Club on previous occasions, and will again
be visible when the ** restoration " of the Court is completed, a short
account of the remains, written by our Treasurer, Col. Bramble, may
be of interest.
70 Clifton Antiquarian Club,
On some Heraldic Tiles, found in 1883, at the Mtnchekt,
BaBKOW GuttNEY.
The following are the chief bearings of these tiles : —
1. Three leopards, or lions. England.
2. Three chevrons. Clare, Lords of the Honour of Gloucester.
4. A chevron between ten crosses form^e. Berkeley.
5. Three eagles displayed, single heads, Bodney of Backwell and
Stoke Rodney.
6. A maunch. Probably De Mohun, Lords of Dunster. Although
this family generally have a hand holding a fieur de lis in the
tnaunch (heraldic sleeve), yet not unfrequently, especially in
early cases, the maunch only is found. In Glover's RoU we
find, '* Reginald de Moun de Qoules ou ung Manche d^ argent, ^^
7. Per f esse six cinque foils or roses counterchanged ; or, it may be
three cinque foils or roses, on a chief as many counterchanged.
This coat, which not unfrequently occurs on tiles in Somerset,
is generally attributed to Patton, but I doubt the correctness of
the suggestion.
8. Quarterly per f esse indented, in the first quarter (second in the tile,
which is reversed) a mullet, Acton of Chelvey. According to
Collinson, this coat is to be foimd in the window over the
altar. The Actons of Iron Acton did not bear the mullet.
From the position of the tiles the tomb is probably that of a Rodney
who married an Acton, and a reference to the pedigrees of these families
might lead to the identification of the individual.
The other tiles, two birds addorsed, a common subject, and others, are
merely conventional and not heraldic.
This pavement was discovered about four feet beneath the surface of
the soil, during the excavations in connection with the *' restoration" of
Barrow Court, in 1883. The central space, about 3 ft. by 6 ft., has
a black cross formed of narrow tiles, and the spaces between the arms of
the cross are filled with heraldic tiles described above ; this central space
is surrounded by two lines of lettered tiles, forming two inscriptions
which though in pai-ts imperfect and destroyed, can be partly read.
^' Dominus '' or '' Domina d' Acton '' appears on the inner line of tiles,
and on the outer row are alternate Ms and R's, which Dr. Hardman
believes to stand for *' Maria Regina." Remains of walls were foimd at
the same time, but the discovery of such remains, outside the walls of the
church, is curious, and has not hitherto been satisfactorily explained.
DUNDKT.
After an ascent of a few miles, up country lanes and roads gay with
spring flowers, from which beautiful views were obtained of the valley of
the Avon, Bristol Channel, Welsh hills, &c., the fine tower of the
little church of St. Michael the Archangel, Dundry , was reached. With
the exception of the tower, this church has been entirely rebuilt ;
a statement that the tower was built by the Merchant Venturers of
Bristol, during the reign of Edward lY., and was probably intended for
n landmark, was read by the secretary from Murray's Guide to Wilts,
Proceedings, 1884-5. 7^
Dorset and Somerset ^ 1882, p. 422, but no authority being quoted
in support of the statement, it can only be taken as a tradition.*
Bishop Clifford said the tower was on the site of an ancient beacon or
" Dawn tree," (Sax. dagian to dawn, or spread light) which had given its
name to the village. CoUinson, Vol. II. p. 104, derives the name '*from two
Erse words, Dun and Draegh^ signifj'ing '* a hill of oaks," and states that
[¥ several oak trees still remained on the hill near the village. A. third
'' ' suggested origin of the name, the well-known " Done-dree" of the local
legend, needs only mention here. The curious square **Dole stone" in
the churchyard was inspected, and the fine octagonal churchyard cross,
figured and described in Crosses of Somerset^ by Peoley, p. 60, who,
however, was mistaken in supposing that the ornamental crocheted finial
is modern, the spire and cross only ha\dng been added by the restorers,
llalf-an-hour's drive down hill from Uundry brought the party to the
quaint old town of
Chew Magna,
where they were not sorry to find luncheon awaiting them at the Pelican
Inn, after partaking of which a visit was made to ''the Church Manor
House," a curious old building near the church in which the court leet
used to be held, and which is now occupied as the parish school. The arms
of the Idth century builders. Saint Loe impaling Fitz Paine, still remain
over the western doorway, and of the same date is the carving in stone
of Saint George and the dragon, over the window. A view of the north
side of the house by Mr. Paid is here given. Mr. George Adlam, F.S.A.,
. whose absence from home prevented his attending the excursion,
had forwarded to the Secretary some '' Notes on the Ajitiquities of Chew
Magna and the neighbourhood," in which he stated that this and similar
church houses in various villages in this portion of Somersetshire
had been built for the use of the parishioners, and were, in medieval
times, used by them on festivals and other similar occasions. On entering
the churchyard, Mr. Hudd drew attention to a large stone lying on the
left side of the path, near the gate, which on examination proved to
be the socket, turned upside down, of a Cross which probably once
stood in the village. It was plainer, and probably older than the
fine 16th century Churchyard Cross, figured by Pooley, which is still
standing on seven octagonsd panelled steps near by. At
The Chukch
the vicaXy the Rev. J. Galbraith, accompanied by the Messrs. Colthurst
and other gentlemen, met the members. Before entering the building
some interesting features of the exterior were inspected. It was
stated that the church was dedicated to Saint Andrew, and that
the chancel had at one time extended considerably further eastward.
* In Godwin and Hine*8 Antiquitiea of Bristol, is a fine engraving of Dundry
tower from a drawing by W. C. Burder, with the following description : —
" The Tower, which was erected by the Merchant Adventurers of Bristol, A.D.
1482, as a landmark for seamen, is remarkable for the beauty of its design," &c.
There appear to be no records remaining of the doinjB^s of the Society at the period
named, and a '* Past. Master" of the Society, to whom I applied for information
on the subject, writes — ** I fear there is nothing but rumour, or rather tradition
for the statement." It seems a most unlikely site for a '* landmark for seamen."
A. £. H.
^2 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
In both the north and south porches traces appeared of what looked
like the remains of the '* Porch-galleries *' once frequent in the district,
but of which that at Weston-in-Gordano is the only one left in anything
like a perfect state. The '* faire church " mentioned by Leland is said
to have been built, or rather rebuilt, by Bishop Beckington, about
the middle of the 15th century, with the exception of the north
aisle, which was founded principally by Sir John St. Loe, c. 1420, and
contains his tomb. His effigy has sufiPered much from the '* restorers,"
having been scraped all over and otherwise injured. Collinson, Rutter,
and other old writers, described this effigy as *^ cross-legged " which is a
mistake ; though on the occasion of this visit, some of the members
thought the alteration had been made at the time the effigy was
*' restored,' ' subsequent examination has shown that this was not the case.
The well-known wooden effigy attributed to Sir John Haut>'ille, the
Baber and other monuments, the carved oak chancel screen, the ancient
font, the old oak lectern with its chained book, and other objects of interest
having been examined, the vicar pointed out the Lock tomb-stone
which he had recently caused to be re-erected near the west end of the
church. Respecting this Mr. George Adlam, F.S.A., thus writes in the
Antiquary^ vol. 11. p. 183, — "In your interesting account of John
Locke and his birth-place, you mention that the grandfather of the
philosopher was John Locke, who purchased an estate at Pilston, East
Brent. But it appears in the '* Life of John Locke " that Nicholas Locke
was his grandfather. This Nicholas is described as a clothier, living at
Sutton Wick, in the parish of Chew Magna, in the churchyard of which
parish he was buried, imder a goodly tomb, opposite the belfry door..
This tomb no longer exists, but in 1855 a small carved head-stone was
exhumed, and has been re-erected by the present vicar. It bears
the following inscription : —
1674.
HERE LIETH THE BODY
OF PETER LOCK OF
THIS PARISH WHO
I DEPARTED THIS WO
IN GOOD.
The register of buriab, under the date 1674, contains the following
entry: — "Peter, son of Peter Locke."
Tne pedigree would, I take it, stand thus : —
NicholM Look, of Sutton Wick, clothier,
buried at Chew M. 1648.
John Lock. Peter Lock.
John Lock, the philosopher. Peter Lock, buried at Chew, 1674.
On the invitation of Mr. John Colthurst a visit was then paid to
the remains of Chew Magna Court House, with its ancient gate-house
recently restored, and the few other fragments of the ancient palace of
the Bishops of Bath and Wells, which had been pulled down about
A.D. 1698, by Edward Baber, Esq. The sites of the ftncient buildings
were pointed out by Mr. Colthurst, who, with the vicar, was, on the
/
,/■
Hxn
-0
mmmmmmmmmBmmmmeBmmmBmmBtsmi
Proceedings, 1884-5. 73
motion of Bishop Clifford, accorded a hearty vote of thanks for their
courteous reception of the Club.
Remounting the carriages the party then proceeded to
Stanton Dbew,
where they were received at the church by the vicar, the Kev. H. T.
Perfect, M.A., who read a paper in which he endeavoured to show that
the church had originally stood north and south, instead of east
and west, and that it was terminated by a Norman apse. Ihis theory of
the vicar's, which was not accepted by the architectural members of the
party, was chiefly founded on a lithographic view published in jbhe
Journal of the British Archaeological Association for 1877, vol. xxxiii.,
p. 298, purporting to represent *' the Church at Stanton Drew." This
was, as Mr. Perfect remarked, " so unlike the present building that any
attempt at reconciling the two seemed utterly absurd," unless the church
had been altered as he suggested. Without re-producing the lithograph
*{see note) it would be difiicult to follow Mr. Perfect's argument in
support of this theory, and we therefore pass on to his description of
'I'
The Church.
"The church of St. Mary, Stanton Drew is not very interesting*
especially in its interior arrangements. In August, 1869, the church wan
visited by the Somersetshire Archaeological & Natural History Society, when
a distinguished antiquarian, Mr. E. A. Freeman, expressed nimself
grateful that a plan of the church hanging on the wall enabled them to
see where they were. Instead of a nave and aisles the church consists of
two almost equal bodies, so that it is difficidt to tell which is the nave
and which the aisle. — {see plan). The chief points of interest in
the church are the small early Norman font, (of which we give a sketch) ;
a decorated doorway on the south side of the tower ; a curious niche,
partly obscured by the organ gallery ; and the strange bosses on the roof.
The queer capitals are said to resemble some in Devonshire, and are very un-
like the usual Somersetshire type ; (see Freeman. Proc. Som. Arch, and
N. H. Soc. xiv. 1. p. 22). The square tower in the centre of the north
side of the church probably formed a porch in itself, before the con-
struction of the present porch. A private chapel was also added to the
east of the tower, which now belongs to Sir Edward Strachey, Bart., who
allows it to be used as a vestry. On first entering the church it strikes
one that the east end of the north, or central aisle, now the private
chapel of Mr. S. B. Coates, has the appearance of having been the
old chancel, and that the south aisle, including the present chancel, was
a more recent addition." Whilst examining the wooden screen which
separates this chapel from the western portion of the aisle, the vicar
discovered a stone partition, about 4 feet high, by 1 foot 4 in. in depth.
At first he was under the impression that this was the old chancel screen,
* It may however be stated that the original water-colour drawing from
which the lithograph was taken, painted by William Lloyd in 1784, now in the
possession of Mr. J. T. Irvine, does not contain the words *' the Church," which
were added by the lithographer without any authority. My own impression is
that Idle view represents the old house still standing a little to the east of the
church.
A. £■ H*
74 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
but finding no opening in the centre for the choir to enter, Mr. Perfect
concluded that it was simply a partition of a proprietory character.*
The celebrated megalithic circles near the church were then visited,
and Mr. Perfect read a paper on the remains, which has been printed at
p. 14 A short discussion followed, in which Bishop Clifford, Dr. Beddoe,
F.R.S., the Secretary and other members took part, but time did not
allow of the date and uses of these megalithic structures being discussed
at any length. After thanking the vicar for his reception, the party left
Stanton iS-ew, and drove to the pretty village of
NOBTON MaLKEWARD,
where they were most hospitably received and entertained at tea by Mr.
and Mrs. Cashmore (Norton Court). On account of the lateness of the
hour it was found necessary to abandon the intention of visiting Norton
church, and a direct path was pointed out by Mr. Cashmore, and the
Rev. J. Catton, M.A., the vicar, who themselves led the way up the steep
hill-side to the last object of the day's excursion,
Maes Kkoll Camp.
Here the Rev. J. Cation made some observations upon the subject of this
camp, and of the Wansdyke of which it was an important fortification, if
not the western extremity. He pointed out the direction of this great
Belgic barrier, which can be traced from this point at intervals, for about
eighty miles in an easterly direction, though all traces of its supposed
extention westward, to Portbury or Portishead, seem now lost. At the
request of the President, Dr. John Beddoe, F.R.S. made some remarks on
the subject which are printed at p. 11. A descent was then made to the
road on the other side of the hill, where the carriages were rejoined, in
which the return journey to Clifton was safely accomplished.
* These ** Pardose " screens to separate a chapel from the main body of
a church, or to protect a monument, were frequent iu the 14th and 15th centuries,
not only in Somersetshire, but throughout England. They were generally made
entirely of wood, and were sometimes most beautifully carved and painted.
Few of them remain in good condition in this part of the country.
A. E. H.
EXCUESION TO
GLOUCESTER, DEERHURST, and TEWKESBURY.'
The second excursion took place on Monday, September the 29th,
1884, when the president, Bishop Clifford, Mr. Alderman F. F. Fox,
vice-president, and about 24 members and friends, including several
ladies, left Clifton Down station in a saloon-carriage, and proceeded
by Midland express to Gloucester, which city was reached about 10 a.m.
Here carriages were in readiness to take the party to Deerhurst Priory
and Tewkesbury, the principal objects of the day's excursion, but, before
leaving Gloucester, a brief visit was paid to the Cathedral, where some of
the chief architectural features were pointed out and commented on by
Mr. T. S. Pope, and other members. Among the features specially
noticed were the richly decorated windows of the south aisle, which are
Proceedings, 1884-5. 75
nearly covered on the exterior with the "ball flower ornament'';
the beautifully "restored" south porch; the huge round Norman
columns of the nave ; the choir, with its handsome vaulted ceiling and
grand east window, one of the largest in England ; the cloisters with
their splendid groined roof, " the earliest example of fan- vaulting " ; the
'' carolB/' twenty in number, said to have been used by the monks
for writing and study ; and the very perfect lavatories with the ad-
joining manutergia^ or recess for towels. Circumstances did not permit
a visit on this occasion to the Lady Chapel, the cr^'pt and other inter-
esting portions of the building. Remounting the carriages, a pleasant
drive of about an hour up the Severn valley, with fine views of the
Cotteswold hills to the east and the Malverns to the west, brought the
party to what the late Mr. Parker, F.S. A. described as " the oldest dated
church in England," —
Deebhtjrst P&ioby Chubch,
where they were received by the vicar, the Rev. George Butterworth,
M.A. After some of the most interesting features of the church had
been inspected, the vicar read a paper on the early history of Deerhurst,
which is printed at p. 22. lie was followed by Mr. Iliomas S. Pope,
who gave an interesting account of some of the architectural remains,
especially of the Saxon work for which this church is famous.
In the discussion which followed considerable difference of opinion as
to the date of this early work was expressed by the president, and other
members, some thinking it probable that Mr. Pope was right in supposing
there were two periods of Saxon work represented, perhaps of the 8th
and 10th centuries, while others inclined to the belief that there were
few if any remains earlier than the 10th centuiy.
After a short interval for refreshments, a start was made for Tewkesbury,
before reaching which town the secretary pointed out to the members
the site of the so-called " Queen Margaret's camp,'' and of the battle
fought May 4th, 1471, between the Yorkists and Lancastrians, which re-
sulted in the complete defeat of Queen Margaret, the death of Edward.
Prince of Wales, and the settlement of Edward lY., " the rightful heir,"
upon the throne of his ancestors.
Tewkesbury Abbey.
Upon reaching the abbey the party was met by the vicar of
Tewkesbury, the Rev. Hemming Robeson, M.A., who kindly acted
as guide, and conducted the members roimd the exterior and interior of
the building, explaining 'and pointing out the chief points of interest.
The grounds were entered by way of the Abbey gate-house, a large,
square, early 15th centur}' building, over 40 feet in height, which is said
to have been erected by Abbot Parker, who died 1412.
Willis speaks of this gate-house as a " very noble one *' ; a good view
of its exterior front, before its restoration in 1849, is given in Lysons's
Gloucestershire Antiquities, pi. 69. The curiously-carved gurgoyles
are original, and interesting. A little to the east of the gate-house is. a
building now known as ''the Abbey house," which is said to have been
before the Dissolution, the Infirmary of the Monastery. After having
been alienated for centuries, and occupied as a private house, this
building has recently (1884) been restored to the abbey, and is now
76 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
occupied as the residence of the vicar. Numerous alterations and
repairs have left little of the original building, but, on the north side is
a curious bay window with a fragment of an inscription, and some
shields beneath being the arms of the abbey, and of Fitz-Hamon.
The West Fkont.
A curious square chamber at the S. W. angle of the Abbey church,
which had for centuries been used as a garden storehouse by the owners
of the Abbey house, was then entered by some modem stone steps.
This was on examination by the architects present, pronounced to have
been the basement of a square Norman tower, and the vicar's suggestion
that it should be restored to the church by opening out the wall
separating it from the south aisle of the nave, was much approved
of. Though there seems to be no sign of a corresponding tower at the
N. W. angle, there can be little doubt that two western towers were
originally designed by the Norman architect of the Abbey church, but
in what way the great round-headed arch of the west front was intended
to be finished still remains a puzzle. It certainly was not intended for a
large window, as it is at present used. This arch differs from those
somewhat resembling it in other particulars in the west fronts of Lincoln
and Peterborough Cathedrals, in that the arch mouldings are carried
continuously from the ground to the head of the arch.
From the west end of the abbey, the members were conducted past the
site of the cloisters, and of the monastic buildings, to the east end of the
church, where the rather continental -looking arrangement of chapels
clustering aroimd the chancel was duly admired and commented upon.
In this respect Tewkesbury Abbey has no rival amongst the grand old
minsters of England, and before the destruction of the Lady chapel, the
site of which was pointed out, must have held its own, even when
compared with the magnificent contemporary Gothic churches of the
continent.
The Iktebiob.
Entering the nave, by the doorway on the south-eastern side, the
members seated themselves in a position from which a good general view
of the interior of the building could be obtained, while the vicar pro-
ceeded to give a brief account of the history and builders of the abbey,
pointing out the portions which had been added at the periods named ;
after which a more minute examination was made of the details, including
the most interestmg monuments, the stained-glass windows, and other
beauties ; from the ^^ Clarence vault," with its supposed remains of the un-
fortimate brother of Edward IV. and Richard III., to the carved bosses
of the roof, recently restored and coloured by Mr. Gambier Parry, which
are an almost complete illustration of Bible history, from th^ Creation
to the Judgment.
After a vote of thanks to the Rev. H. Robeson for the kind manner in
which he had received the Club, and the information he had given
respecting the various objects of interest, which had added so greatly to
the pleasure of the visit, had been proposed by Bishop Clifford, and
carried enthusiastically by all present, the members proceeded through
the picturesque streets of one of the most interesting towns in England,
noticing in passing the various quaint specimens of 16th and 16th
Proceedings, 1884-5. 77
century half-timbered houses of which so many are there to be found,
to "the Swan Hotel," where dinner was partaken of. The return
journey was made by an evening train from the Tewkesbury station,
Clifton being reached soon after 8 p.m. The magnificent weather with
which the members had been favoured, added greatly to the enjoyment
of the excursion.
MEETING, NOVEMBER 12th, 1884.
BisHor Cliffobd, President, in the Chair.
A paper upon " Old Car\'ed Chests " was read by Mr. Thomas S. Pope,
illustrated by upwards of forty drawings by the author of examples in
the West of England, dating from the 1 3th to the 17th century. This
paper is printed with illustrations in this volume. In the discussion
which followed, Bishop Clifford, Col. Bramble, Mr. Almond, Mr. Thos.
Kerslake, Mr. John Taylor, and other members took part. Col. Bramble
thea exhibited and read some notes upon some ancient documents from
Bristol. Ist, ** On St. E wen's Church as a Public Library," which is
published in this volume ; 2nd, *' Some old Deeds belonging to the
Parish of St. Mary-le-Port," which it is hoped to print hereafter.
Several members took part in the discussion on the contents of these
documents which are of considerable local interest.
ANNUAL MEETING, JANUARY 28th, 1886.
The first Annual Meeting was held on Wednesday, January 28th,
1885, Bishop ClifTord, president, in the chnir.
Lieut.-Col. J. R. Bramble, treasurer, read a financial statement for the
previous year, showing a satisfactory balance in hand. At the request
of the treasurer an auditor was appointed to examine the accounts, Dr.
G. F. Burder imdertaking the duty.
The president then read an address^ of which, owing to the im-
fortunate loss of the MS. notes, only a brief abstract can be here given.
Abstract of President's Address.
Bishop Clifford commenced with a brief statement of the causes that
led to the formation of the Clifton Antiquarian Club, which have already
been alluded to in an earlier portion of this volume ; one of the chief of
these being to continue the work so well commenced under the guidance
of Mr. John Reynolds, of Redland, whose " archajological picnics"
during past years had afforded much pleasure to all who had been
privileged to take part in them. It was pointed out that the field over
which the work of the Club might be supposed to extend, included not
only the whole of the Counties of Gloucester and Somerset, with the
ancient City of Bristol, which lies between the two, but belongs to
neither ; but also, irrespective of county boundaries, any place or object
of antiquarian interest which could be easily reached from Bristol as a
centre.
The first twelve mouths of the existence of the Club had shown, by
the good attendance of members and friends at the meetings and
yS Clifton Antiquarian Club,
excursions, that the promoters were not mistaken in their opinion that
such a society was wanted in this neighbourhood.
Some interesting papers had b^en read at the evening meetings of the
Club ; these it was proposed to publish in tlie Journal of Proceedings,
which would also contain a report of the excursions.
The president then referred to some of the objects of interest which
had been visited during the year, commencing with the prehistoric
remains, and megaUthic circles nt Stanton Drew. Though much
smaller than the somewhat similar remains at Avebury and Stonehenge,
these in our own neighbourhood are perhaps older, and are certainly next
to them in point of interest. It was intended that in the course of the
coming year or two excursions should be arranged to both these large
circles, and also to other megalithic remains within easy reach of
Bristol.
Among other monuments of prehistoric times, the president also
alluded to the Wansdyke, the great western fortress of which Belgic
boundary line, now known as '^ Maes Knoll," had been visited by the
Club on the same day as Stanton Drew. It was proposed to visit shortly
the most perfect portion remaining to us of the Dyke, on the Wiltsliire
downs between Calne and Marlborough.
Coming down to a rather later period, when the history of our
country may be said to commence, we have within a short distance
of Bristol nimierous camps and battle-fields, the scenes of some of the
important engagements, in which Britons and Saxons, Englishmen and
Danes, contended for the mastery. Also we have many historic sites
connected with later periods of history.
To architectuitd students, and especially to those who are interested in
the rise and progress of church architecture in our country, the district
is rich in examples; the churches of Deerhurst, in Gloucestershire,
Bradford-on-Avon and Abury in Wilts, are amongst the finest specimens
left to us of the Primitive Romanesque, or Anglo-Saxon style. In
Gloucester Cathedral, Tewkesbury, Glastonbury and Malmesbury Abbeys,
and Bristol Cathedral with its noble Chapter house and great Gateway,
we have splendid examples of the late Romanesque or Anglo-Norman
style. The next stage, the Fii'st Pointed or Early English, is finely
illustrated in Salisbury and Wells Cathedrals, and in the beautiful
** Elder Lady Chapel," at Bristol. Gloucester Cathedral, St. Mark's, or
the Mayor's Chapel, Bristol, and Bristol Cathedral show us the Second
Pointed or Decorated style. But perhaps our district is richest of all in
examples of the Third Pointed or Perpendicidar style, of which in
Somersetshire more especially, we have some of the most noted churches.
Though it is rather the fashion to find fault with this Perpendicular
architecture, we should remember that it has many beauties of its own,
and moreover that it is more than any other an exclusively English style,
and is by some supposed to have originated in our County of Gloucester.
No one can look at such churches as that of St. Mary Redclifi*. or Bath
Abbey, or at such splendid towers as those at St. Cuthbert's, Wells ; St.
John*s, Glastonbury ; Wrington, Banwell, St. Stephen's, Bristol ;
Dundry, Thombury, Bitton, Taunton, Bruton, Huish, and many other
Somersetshire examples, without admiring these works of the English
school of architecture.
We have also in the West of England and South Wales fine Norman
Proceedings y 1884-5. 79
and Mediseval Castles, at Berkeley, Chepstow, Raglan, etc., and numerous
interesting remains of domestic architecture in Manor houses, dating
from the 14th to the 18th century, such as Clevedon Court, Tickenham,
Lytes Carey, Nailsea, Chelvey, Barrow, Long Ashton, and many more ;
some of which have been visited by the members of the Club during the
past season.
Bishop Clifford concluded by advising every member of the Club to take
up some special branch of antiquarian study, so that more good results
might follow from the visits and excursions to places of interest, than if
all gave their attention to similar branches of the subject.
A vote of thanks to the president for his interesting address was
moved by Mr. W. V. Gough, seconded by the Rev. Beaver H. Blacker,
M. A., and carried by acclamation. The ballot for officers and committee
for the year, 1885, then took place, the following being the result: —
president, Bishop Clifford ; vice-presidents, Mr. John Reynolds and Mr.
Francis F. Fox ; treasurer, Col. Bramble ; secretary, Mr. Alfred E.
Hudd ; committee, Mr. F. J. Fry, Mr. W. F<. Jones, Mr. A. C. Pass, and
Mr. John Taylor.
Mr. W. Derham, M.A., and Mr. S. Cashmore were elected members
of the Club, in the room of Mr. J. Dallas and Dr. Steven, who had left
Clifton.
SPECIAL MEETING, MAECH 17th, 1885.
On Tuesday, March 17th, 1885, a special general meeting of the
members of the Club was held in the Lectuie Theatre of the Bristol
Museum and Library, Bishop Clifford, president, in the chair, to hear a
lecture from Lt.-Col. James R. Bramble — '* On Mediaeval Annour," which
is printed at p. 39.
On the conclusion of this most interesting lecture, which was
illustrated by numerous rubbings from monumental brasses. Bishop
Clifford in moving a vote of thanks which was carried by acclamation,
remarked that instructive lectures such as that just given added greatly
to the pleasure to be derived by those who had the privilege of hearing
them, from visits to ancient buildings and museums where examples of
the objects themselves, or representations of them in brass or marble,
could be examined. It was hoped that other members of the Club who
were quite competent to do so, would follow the excellent example set
them by their worthy treasurer, and that Col. Bramble would also
at some future meeting continue the history of the interesting subject
he had so well commenced by giving the Club the benefit of his extensive
knowledge of the history of English civil and ecclesiastical costume.
Mr. J. Almond, Mr. H. M. Herapath, Mr. John Williams and the
secretary added a few remarks on the subject of the lecture.
Advantage was taken of the occasion to make a presentation to
Mr. John Reynolds, one of the vice-presidents of the Club, consisting of
a silver epergne, several volumes of books, and an illuminated address
containing the names of the subscribers. The inscription engraved on
the epergne was as follows — ** Presented to John Keynolds, Esq., by
seventy-^ree friends in recollection of many pleasant antiquarian excur-
sions under his guidance.'' Several subscribers who were not members
'^O Ch/i'm Ant'^TmarviH C-rf
-rf rSi^ *" f An .i.iCi'-.ar
"aa '' "-*.■;
r*r.n »^»» 1
vrfv,*»^.-;.^;^ -,•• ^^ i^
* V.'jIs*
1^ ' jnlf'-O ■ , ..JD'
V . « m* ^ t
- ^-»
A • ii \ iii- C yJLJj^z^. '^ '
'tstfr •A.r't *rz-*-..r*-rf'A -'Y V>^ airaL-v-r* ,^ lift *,1-J; -.•-it ^
^t- .-.*-;;< • j<^? >.*.-.. 1 '•'•->, wi#-^ 4-v,«ir ry.--^" ait-^EJ^Tv imi ±r:
*^;j<r */' r*/^.»^^.* 'yf IV^-vx^ V» '^ ^^^ttr^ '■a tiii'» ocn-**i':ii- the Tiewof
r-p r/7 U»^ r/r...j»ftt «r.r»-»r..n^ w-.tik wr.>-a tii*' day op«j#e*L will »jc ^oon be
y,,A/ n,s»t^^ * p^iK. by k;ryl ^^frmi^vm. of Henry Bnywce. Et-^^ BIackJaiMia>
Hh»^rw waw wr^^ r«*/'f./^ w'n^^re a ^iLr^t ^toppa^e wa» niade f«3r tike
The Wajtadtke,
ni^;$itf \Xm yiwUttfi with th^ Rornaii roa^L knriwn a« the "^Via Julia.*
T>»i« i* fi^iff^ \fy Stnk^lky in hw book on Abxiry, and i» reproduced in
itte iUrr, A, C', hffiith'fi recently published Antir^uities of X. WUUkire^
pL jji. fitf, 2, wYterf: a grj^jd a/rc^nint of the WiitAhire portion of the dyke
will )fH found, 'thin ancient XernVstiaX bomniary, conid^n^ of a lu^
hank with a dit/rh <m \U north 4irle« extended for nearly 100 mile;> from
HtfmerMdtihirH Ut the woodland* r^f Berluhire, and is supposed to have
})4!en ittrttXlrturuA^ about ^VXl B.C., by the Belgae, to divide their
utm^-n^'urtM f rr#m thrjue (4 the Boduni and other British tribes whom they
Wl driven northward. A few remarks upon the dyke were made by
CoL Bramble and Mr. Hu/ld near Shepherd*8 shore, where a halt.
WHH matU: itt examine itn remains w)tich are here for some miles in nearly
KrriMii VAnuWium, Its name is almrjftt eertainly from Woden, the god of
nin/lariiii, W<xlen*« dyke having become Wansdyke, in the same way
tliat W^Klen's daeg has bc<Mjme W ednettday.
rankling the little village of Beckhampton, where few if any remains of
♦♦ th<! avifiiue " exist, Avebury was reached soon after 1 p.m. Here the
hungry antiquaries were not sorry to find a substantial luncheon awaiting -
thcrn at the Red Lipn, to which, after the drive over the breez\'
Wiltsliire downs, ample justice was done.
AVEBUEY ChtTBCH.
A vii»it was then paid to the interesting parish church of St. James,
wli<rc the vicnr, the Kcv. Bryan King, M.A., pointed out the chief
fcuturcn of interest, foremost amongst which are the very curious
Proceedings, 1 884-5. 8 1
remains of the ori«^inal Suxon church discovered during the restoration
of the building in 1872. The most interesting of these are the circular
clei'estory windows, of which there were originally eight. One of these
when it was discovered still retained portions of plastered basket-work,
known as " wattle-and-daub," which the vicar believed to have come from
a still earlier church of British Christians which probably stood near this
spot in pre-Saxon times. The Norman font, the handsome carved-wood
chancel screen richly coloured and gilt, and other features of this
interesting church having been noticed, Mr. King led the way to the
interior of the huge encircling mound surroimding what, though but a
fragment of the original structure, is still undoubtedly *' the grandest re-
lic of an ancient heathen temple in Europe."
The Stone Cikcles.
Of the 648 stones which, according to the Kev. A. C. Smith's account,
the Avebury temple was composed, only about 48 remain above ground ;
A-iz., 31 inside the mound, 15 in the Kennet avenue, and two known as
the '* Long Stones," near Beckhampton. Mr. King pointed out most of
the 31 stones still visible inside the temple, and the piosition of others
which had been ascertained by the Kev. A. C. Smith to be under the
surface.
After thanking the vicar for his guidance and his interesting account
of both the pre-historic and early Christian remains of the locality, the
party left Avebury by way of the Kennet avenue, and soon arrived at
SiLBVBY Hill.
llie more energetic members of the party made the ascent of *' the
largest artificial hill in Western Europe " ; and on the plateau at the
summit a brief account was given of the structure, and of the excavations
which had from time to time been made, in the vain hope of discovering
its real nature. It doubtless had some connection with the circles
at Avebury, and was probably either a sepulchral mound of some mighty
British chief or hero, or a post for observation or defence. Passing the
remains of the Roman road, and the fine British and Roman stronghold
known as Oldbury camp, with the well-known white horse carved on the
hillside near it, the members arrived at
■
Chekhill Kectoky,
where they were hospitably entertained by the Rev. W. C. and Mrs.
Plenderleath, who had kindly invited them to partake of tea, after which
Cherhill church and a fine old tithe bnm near it were visited. The drive
was then continued to
Calne,
where the parish church was examined, imder the guidance of Mr.
Thomas S. Pope, who made some remarks on its interesting late Norman
and *' Third Pointed " architecture, and upon a curious wooden chest in
the north aisle. The pai'ty returned from Chippenham by the 7.45
ti-ain, reaching Bristol soon after 9 p.m.
6
82 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
FORMATION. OF A SECTION OF THE CLUB.
In May, 1885, it was resolved to form a section of the Club for
a more detailed examination of objects of antiquarian interest in tlio
neighbourhood of Bristol, walks and excursions to be taken at short
intervals, generally on Saturday afternoons.
On Saturday, June 25th, the first sectional excui'sion took place, when
a visit was paid to
PoRTBTJRY, Somersetshire,
where the Church, the remains of the Priorj', the ancient Camp, and other
antiquities were examined, and several objects of special interest were
carefully drawn to scale by members present. The vicar, the Rev. T. O.
Tyler, M.A., and Mrs. Tyler, met the members at the church, and after-
wards kindly entertained them at tea, at the Itector}-.
An excursion to Old Sarum and Stonehenge had been planned for
Friday, October ^nd, but at the last moment it was postponed sine die, on
account of the unsettled state of the weather.
. MEETING, DECEMBER 15th, 1885.
Bishop CrrFFORD, President, in the Chair.
Mr. Alfred E. Hudd, hon. sec, exhibited ground plans and elevations
of the Saxon chapel recently discovered at Deerhurst, which had been
kindly forwarded for the purpose by Mr. C'oUins, of Tewkesbury,
and read some notes on the subject which have been printed at p. 27.
A tracing and photograph of the celebrated Saxon font in the parish
church at Deerhurst, which is said to be of the time of the Venerable
Bede (a.d. 072-735), kindly lent him by the Rev. G. F. Browne, B.D.,
of Cambridge, were also exhibited by Mr. Iludd, and were much admired.
A paper was then read by Mr. Thomas S. Pope, on ** Old Iron-work,"
illustrated by numerous sketches by the author from examples in
the neighbourhood of Bristol and by some specimens from tliQ Bristol
Museum, which it is hoped will be published hereafter. In the
discussion which followed several members took part. The recent
disappearance of some noteworthy examples of ancient ironwork formerly
remaining in the neighbourhood of Bristol was alluded to.
Lieut. -Col. J. R. Bramble then exhibited a beautiful 15th centurj^ Cope,
lately discovered in Yatton church, and kindly sent for the inspection of
the members of the Club by the vicar of Yatton. Many years ago this
cope, which was of blue velvet with a rich oq>hrey containing figures of
twelve saints imder canopies, had been cut to pieces and made into
a pall, probably in the 16th centur}\ Thefigm-es were, notwithstanding
the rough usage the work has received, in fair preseiTation, and many
of them were identified by Colonel Bramble and Bishop Clifford. It is
to be hoped great care will be taken of this valuable relic of antiquity.
A paper on " The Roman road from Bath to Caorwent '* was then
Proceedings, 1884-5. 83
read by Mr. A. 'J'. Martin, M.A., of Clifton collep^e, in which the writer
br()ii«^ht forward a considerable number of factn to support the theory
that the station Abona. upon this road, was at Sea Mills, as supposed by
Sever, and not nearer the Severn, as had been suggested by Bishop
Clifford and other wi-itei-s. This paper is printed at p. 58.
Votes of thanks to the readers of papers, and to those gentlemen who
had sent objects of interest for exhibition, were carried unanimously, on
the motion of the president
65>8.86 J<iH\ Wright & Co. Pbintkhh, Bkibtol.
Clifton Antiquarian Club. 85
^Iti Sron-b)orik in tf)e S^est of
By THOMAS S. POPE.
{Read December Ibth, 1885.)
TN making these few remarks upon the subject selected for our
■*■ consideration this evening I have confined myself chiefly to local
remains, most of which, though more or less simple in design,
exhibit the great characteristic of all good work — fitness for the
purpose they have to fulfil. This paper treats only of iron-work,
brass and other metal- work being reserved for another occasion.
I need scarcely remind my hearers that Bristol possesses some
good old brass eagle lecterns, a fine old brass corona in Temple
Church, and also, although not so well known, some interesting
specimens of old church plate. It is a matter for wonder that
so little ancient iron- work remains here, taking into consideration
the foreign trade of Bristol — especially with Spain, a country so
rich in metal work — and also its nearness to the Forest of Dean,
and to the City of Gloucester, which was the Birmingham of the
middle ages. In the 19th year of King Henry II. no less than
25,000 great nails with heads were supplied by the Borough of
Gloucester for the King's house at Winchester. The scarcity of
old metal-work can only be accounted for by the general scramble
at the Beformation, and during Cromwell's wars, when the people,
instead of turning their swords into reaping hooks, turned much
of the church iron- work into pikes ; for we know that old tombs
and reliquaries were in many instances protected with elaborate
iron-work, which is all gone, and could scarcely have been taken
on account of the value of the metal, which was but little. Much
injury has also been done by modem ''restorations," the old
work having been thrown away as useless, and replaced in too
Vol. I., Part II. (1885—6.) 1
86 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
many instances by cast iron, or, what is nearly as bad, malleable
iron, very cheap, very pretentious, and, may I use the term, very
snobbish in design. No doubt better work has been done of late
years by such men as Skidmore, Hardman, and Singer of Frome,
but so long, I think, as the real workman cannot associate his own
name with his work we cannot expect much that is good. The
absorption of the workman into the large manufacturing firm
prevents his taking that pride in his work that no doubt pre-
vailed in the middle ages, which produced such masterpieces as
the Gloucester candlestick, now in the South Kensington Museum.
Imagine a Benvenuto Cellini, or a Peter Vescher, shut up in a
Birmingham manufactory !
I have been able to find but few remains of old iron-work in the
neighbourhood of Bristol, and these consist principally of hinges,
closing-rings, latches, escutcheons, and fragments of railings and
grilles, with a lock here and there, until we come to " the Queen
Anne period " as it is now called, of which there is an abundance
of specimens in Bristol and the neighbourhood, to which I shall
have to call attention presently.
The beautiful enamelled candlesticks in St. Thomas Church,
Bristol, are scarcely, I think, home made ; I have seen their exact
counterpart in some foreign publication. Possibly they are of
12th or 13th century date, and of foreign make ; Nuremberg was
the seat of such manufactures for a long period.^
The methods of iron ornamentation used in this neighbour-
hood were very simple ; plates of iron perforated with patterns
in one or two thicknesses were fixed for closing-rings to latches,
and to form ornamental locks, with a background of red cloth or
leather, and often had an ornamental twisted rim enclosing and
giving depth to the whole ; the ring generally had a knob of
iron at its lower portion and two of the same description near the
centre ; these knobs were often ornamented with dots or crosses
sunk into the surface of the iron, and sometimes the ring had
two lizards meeting in the centre, as in an example at Tewkes-
bury. Hinges were ornamented in a similar manner, and, with
the decorative scrolls, both ornamented and strengthened the
'These candlesticks are figured in vol. III. of the TraiM, B. and G, Arch, Soc.
PI. III., where they are described as of copper, originally gilt, the patterns filled
io with champlev^ enamel ; and it is suggested that they are more probably the
work of Limoges rather than German. Kp.
Old Iron-work in the West of England. 87
doors, being returned on the framing and bolted through the
thickness of the doors, the bolt heads forming part of the
ornamentation of the hinge. Nails also, in many cases, were
used as a means of protection, and being arranged in patterns,
added to the effect of the doors. Several patterns of old nail-
heads are given in Parker's Glossary,
Grilles, such as the one which remains at South Petherton,
protected the windows, and were so admirably constructed that
it was almost impossible to break through the iron without re-
moving the stonework also. The heads of stanchions to windows
were often formed with grotesque patterns, as in the one* from
Huntspill Church. The ends of the hinges at Cirencester Church *
are formed with representations of dogs' heads. I have noticed
in early Italian iron-work that the ornamental heads seem to be
taken from serpents, and are often made of scrap-iron, with nails
driven through it to represent teeth, a thin piece of iron sharpened
at the end for a tongue, and eyes and eyeballs almost starting
from the head; wonderfully clever, reminding one of the "fiery
serpents " of Moses. Such a work is an iron bracket upon a
column at Sienna. Our English lizards and snakes are much
tamer productions ; those at Tewkesbury, and on an old lock at
Christ Church, Bristol,* seem to have been taken from the little
harmless creatures which we see in our streams, but the tongues
are, I think, dogs' tongues ; very mild these compared with the
foreign serpents. The hinges upon the door to the crypt under
the chapter house at Wells have terminations representing birds
pecking at flowers. These hinges are well illustrated in CoUings's
Gothie Details,
Sometimes plates of iron are continued around the upper edge
of a door, with scrolls at intervals, as at Wedmore^, and, I think,
at Westerleigh. I give some sketches of hinges I have met
with, those from Moorlynch®, Hawkesbury^, and Inglesham
Churches being among the best. I have not given a sketch of
the very remarkable early hinges at present upon the porch door
of Meare Church, Somerset ; they are very rough, and appear
either to have been removed from some older building, or are
copies by the village smith, possibly from some at Glastonbury
Abbey, not far distant. Some very good hinges also remain upon
« Plate xi fig. 3. 3 Plate xi. ^g 2. * Plate xiii. fig. 20.
5 Plate xi. fig. 1. ^ Plate xi fig. 6. 7 Plate xi. fig. 4.
88 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the north door of Chedzoy Church, similar in design to those at
Wedmore ; the rough hammer marks left on the iron gives an
effect we fail to obtain in modem work. The hinges upon the
south porch of Gloucester Cathedral are no doubt early, and are
effective in design. The smaller hinges found upon old pews are
quaint, and sometimes rather pretty. I show some few examples
of the 16th and 17th centuries. There were not long since some
fire-iron dogs and brackets for cooking, in an old house at
Olveston, upon the hill near the Thornbury road.
Locks. —Of old locks I have been able to find but few ; of two
of the best I gave sketches in my paper upon old chests®, viz.,
one from Fairford and one from Zeals House, Wilts. In most
cases the ancient locks have been removed from old chests and
comparatively modem ones substituted. There are still remain-
ing three old locks upon a chest in the belfry of Christ Church,
Bristol, of the best of which I give a sketch ® ; judging from the
mouldings of buttresses I should think it was late 15th or early
16th century work. I also show sketches of old locks at Little
Sodbury Court, and at Ottery St. Mary Church, Devon, both pro-
bably of 16th century work.
Ring-platea and Latches. — Considerable numbers of ring-plates
and latches still remain, of which I give a selection ; those
from Portishead ^®, Portbury^S Little Sodbury ^^ and East
Brent ^, are among the best. Drawings of many good examples
are published in Brandon's Analysis, Collings's Details, and
Instrumenta Ecclesiastica, One of the best I have seen was
upon an old Manor House at Norton, Wilts, opposite the Church.
Knockers. — There is a plain though quaint knocker at Iron
Acton Court, and one more ornate at the old Manor House at
Gumey Street, near Bridgwater. The ring plate at Little Sod-
bury Court seems to have also served the purpose of a knocker.
I may here state what may be useful to some of my hearers that
I found this very pretty 16th century iron- work at Little Sodbury
through pursuing a principle of going on in a house or church
until I am told to go out. I found this upon a door to an upper
bedroom, and sketched it before I had to make my excuses. The
fact is the mediseval traditions in small details were retained in
country places down to Queen Anne's time. I have seen much
8 Proceedings, ante, pp. 33-38. » Plate xiii. fig. 20. " Plate xi. fig. 6.
" Plate xi. figs. 7 and 10. " Plate xi. fig. 8. »3 pjate xi. fig. 9.
Old Iron-work in the West of England. 89
80-called modem design in ornamental glazing, which is merely
copied from the repairs of mediaaval and Jacobean glass. King
Solomon was not far wrong when he said, '' there is nothing
new under the sun."
Latches. — Some old Norfolk latches had plates of quite
medisBval pattern ; I sketched one at Wedmore which very in-
geniously served as latch, ring-plate, and knocker ; it was upon
an old cottage.
OriUage. — Some very pretty ironwork remains in old church
windows, as at Langley Burrell/^ what the French call
''gnUager a picturesque and ingenious way of glazing, with
small pieces of glass.
Hour-glass Stands. — Many of the old iron stands for hour-
glasses remain in our churches, but most of the glasses are gone.
I give some specimens from Bristol, Kempsford, Somerton Keynes,
and Inglesham.^^ The one at St. John Baptist Church, Bristol,^^
remains perfect, and there is also one, illustrated in Weale's
papers, at Gompton Bassett, Wilts. The one from St. John's,
Bristol, is probably of Nuremberg make, having the eagle of the
empire upon the bracket.
All who have been in Dartmouth Church will remember the
leopards in iron-work on the door, and probably also the inner
columns with wrought iron scrolls fastened with pins on the
capitals. The work on the door is well illustrated in Wyatt's
Iron-work.
Scrapers. — Old scrapers made of wrought iron, quaint in de-
sign, and cheap to make, remain at Lyme Begis,^^ Weston
Zoyland,^ Marshfield, &c.
Casement Fastenings. — Some casement fastenings and stops for
ditto, of which many remain in the old houses in this neighbour-
hood, are figured from Cromhall,^® Corsham^, Axmouth,*^ &c.
They are interesting from their quaintness.
Screens. — One of the most interesting sketches is that of the
screen around a tomb in Berkeley Church,^ very simple in design,
using but httle material, but yet quite suitable for its purpose,
and with the addition of a little gold and colour, quite orna-
mental. The railing to a bishop's tomb, Bath Abbey, is also
'< Plate xii. fig. 18. 'S Plate xiii. figs 21, 2?, 23, 24. '• Plate xiii. fig. 21,
'7 Plate xi. fig. 11. '8 Plate xi. fig. 12. '» Plate xii. fig. 16.
»« Plate xii. fig. 16. " Plate xii. fig 17. " Plate xii. fig. 14.
90 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
effective with its bannerets at the angles, and coats of arms sur-
rounded with garters, in the centre. I have also given sketches
of railings over butchers' shops at Malmesbury, which, if not
very old, which is questionable, are evidently in the true spirit
of the old work, and serve their purpose admirably, giving plenty
of air and excluding birds, &c. There is a pretty piece of railing
remaining round a tomb in Salisbury Cathedral, with bannerets
at the angles, and also some to Bishop Beckington's tomb in
Wells Cathedral. Members may remember the wrought-iron finial
from a tomb in Chew Magna Church, of which I gave a sketch.
There is also some good iron- work in Farley Castle Chapel.
We have many examples of fine wrought iron Queen Anne
work, notably at St. Mary Bedcliff, at Temple Church, and at
St. Nicholas Church, which, however, is not so good as the others.
There was a good gate with piers at Maule's Nursery, Stapleton
Boad, a gate, now much damaged, at the Barracks, Hotwells, and
some pretty pieces at Sion Hill, and scattered about the Hotwells.
Much of this has been illustrated lately in the BuUdifig News. I
give some few examples : I believe the iron-work at Temple
Church is foreign, the leaves having the appearance of being
stamped ; that at Bedcliff is much better, being hammered out
by hand. One of the prettiest bits is from a gate near Moreton-
in-the-Marsh, taken from a sketch kindly lent me by my friend
Mr. Wood, the architect. No one can look upon this 17th cen-
tury iron- work without feeling that in this the best traditions of
art have been retained, much more than in the plain brick houses
which it has been the fashion to copy of late. In much of this
18th century iron-work the outline is so good, as in the panel
from the vicinity of Bristol ^ (which I found at Mr. Harris's
shop), that by filling in gothic foliage one could make very good
mediaeval looking screens, as I have always thought the late Sir
Gilbert Scott did for some of his Cathedral screens.
In conclusion, I would call attention to Violet le Due's account
of his visit to the ancient serrurier, in his work entitled
Mobilier, in which he quaintly states what he saw there; he also
gives an illustration, I believe of the Gloucester candlestick,
although he does not call it by that name.
And now, gentlemen, I feel I am nearly hammered out, so far
as iron-work in our neighbourhood is concerned, but must assure
»3 Plate xii. 6g. 19.
Motion
8 .£iale> Sadiury
/S.Mztchurvk
•ii^"i""^i»— i^^"
Plat4^ in.
C *
O
e
^
^ Jl€ulin^^.Ser/celef/ t^^Uimh^.
'/6. Cromhall
7
V
^6. Ccr^uijnv
iy. Casemcftt step
Axnwvuth/ Ckarch/
nailOj Itli
•iinimiiiiiiiiiiii
i^lllnnft
^
fS.lMnglet/Jk(rTtll Church
Tlati>JM.
Z3.<Sam&fi>ni'A
Old Iron-'Work in the West of England. 91
you, if you have found the subject somewhat dry, that I have
done my very best to get some sparks out of it.
The following is a list of the drawings of ancient iron- work in
illustration of the above paper exhibited by Mr. Pope ; those
printed in italics are reproduced in Plates xi., xii. and xiii.
Eailings, &c. — 1 and 2, Bath Abbey ; 3, Luckington Church ;
4, Bristol Cathedral ; 5, Berkeley Church ; 6, Bradford ; 7, Here-
ford Cathedral; 8, Langley BurreU; 9, S. Petherton; 10 and 11,
Malmesbury.
Hinges, &c. — 12, Branscombe, Devon ; 13, Cirencester Church ;
14, Wedmore Church ; 15, Inglesham Church ; 16, Newnton ; 17,
Norton; 18, Hawkesbury ; 19, Kempsford; 20, Moorlinch 21,
Wliitchurch ; 22, Winterbourne ; 23, Melksham ; 24, Bleadon ;
25, Box; 26, Abson ; 27, Tewkesbury.
Escutcheons, Eings, &o. — 28, Corsham; 29, JB. Brent; 80,
Ubley ; 31, Sherboume ; 32, Horton ; 33, Wanborough ; 34,
Locking; 35, Colyton; 36, Porthury ; 37, Iron Acton; 38, Port-
Imry ; 39, L. Sodbury ; 40, Chew Magna; 41, Portishead; 42 and
43, Eedcliflf; 44, Berkeley.
Locks.— 45, Little Sodbury ; 46, Ottery St. Mary ; 47, Christ
Churchy Bristol; 48, Old Iron Key.
Casement Fastenings.— 49, Bristol; 50, Pucklechurch ; 51,
Winterbourne; 52, Corsham; 53, CromJulU; 54, Bishopstone ; 56,
Codford; 56, Bristol; 57, Little Sodbury; 58, Axmouth; 59,
Sodbury ; 60, Liddington, Wilts.
Hour-Glass Stands, Scrapers, Enogeers, Grillage, &c.
— 61, Somerford Keynes; 62, Inglesham; 63, Kempsford; 64,
near Barnstaple ; 65, Laycock ; 66, Luckington ; 67, Marshfield ;
68, Lyme Regis ; 69, Weston Zoyland ; 70, Iron Acton; 71, near
Bridgwater ; 72, Gumey St. Manor ; 73, Publow ; 74, Draycot,
Wilts ; 75, Dartmouth ; 76, Huntspill ; 77, Sharncote ; 78, 79,
Alms Box, Sutton Benger, Wilts ; 80, 81, Hour-glass and Bracket,
St. John*s Church, Bristol.
Bailings. — 82, Sherston Church ; 83, Chew- Stoke ; 84, Gate,
Patchford ; 85, Panel, Bristol : 86, and 87, Lamp brackets, Led-
bury ; 88, St. Stephen's, Bristol; 89, Ledbury; 90, Carew; 91,
Bristol.
92 Clifton Antiquanan Club.
0\\ an Ancient Cope at |^atton»
domeriset.
By Lbut.-Cou J. R. BRAMBLE, Hon. Tbkasitrkr.
{Read December 15M, 1885.)
In the Account Books for the Paxish of Tatton, the following
entries appeax, under date of 1481 : —
'* Paid at Bristow for a Sewte of Vestments and
a Cope. £xxyi
^' In costs spende abowth the buying of the same
Vestments.
'' Paid at Bristow in coste to John Beks, when he
fett home ye Vestments. vd
" I paide to ye Bushope ys man for halowyng of
ye Vestments. vid
What became of the " Sewte of Vestments " I am unable to
tell you ; probably when in the years 1547 or 8/' the images and
iryn " in the church were taken down, and the " Sylvr Crosse
of our Church was sold by the kenne/' and the proceeds
bestowed "upon the makyng of a syrten Sllusse, or yere ajenste ye
rags of the salt water/' the vestments suffered a similar fate.
But what from its design I cannot doubt to have been the Cope
to which the entry refers was made into a Fall — ^not into an
altar cloth as some have supposed — and by the courtesy of the
Rev. Prebendary Walrond, the Vicar of the Parish, I have the
pleasure of being able to exhibit it to you this evening.
As most of the Members are aware, the cope is the proces-
sional, as distinguished from the eucharistic vestment of the
MediaBval Church. The eucharistic vestment or chasuble is
often shortly described in ancient documents as simply a " vest-
ment," or with its accessories as a " suit of vestments." The
Ancient Cope at Yatton^ Somerset. 93
cope was in form a complete, or nearly a complete semicircle ; the
straight side (passing round at the back of the neck and hanging
down in front on each side when worn) being richly embroidered
with gold and silk, in a design which varies according to the date
of the work. Not infrequently also the semicircular edge was
ornamented with a narrow border of embroidery of more simple
pattern. The embroidery is termed the orphreys from auri-
fragium. The cope was fastened across the breast with a morse
or clasp often richly jewelled. Beneath the cope was worn a
cassock, and over this a surplice with hanging sleeves. The
chasuble, on the other hand, was worn with an alb, having tight
sleeves. Over the surplice was worn an almuce or fur hood,
which rested on the shoulders over the cope, and had tails or
pendants, which hung down in front beneath it. In modern
copes there is usually a richly embroidered hood or quasi- hood,
but in mediaeval copes, the hood where it exists is of very small
dimensions, and the almuce, as a rule, affords a much more
graceful substitute.
The body of the cope as distinct from the orphreys was of
velvet, silk, or other fabric, some times plain, and at others
richly embroidered in a diapered or conventional pattern, or in
special cases with groups of saints and emblems. The cope now
before you has a groundwork of blue velvet richly embroidered
in gold and silk in a conventional floriated pattern. In a paper
on English Mediaval Embroidery, in the first volunlfe of the
ArcJueological Journal, pages 329 — 31, are figured several de-
signs, similar in character, although different in detail. This
portion of the cope has been cut into three strips, each about
ten inches in width, and these alternately with two strips into
which the richly embroidered orphrey has been divided, have
been sewn together side by side.
The pattern hangs right and left from the centre, and from
this mode of arrangement the work has been utterly unfitted for
the purpose of an altar-cloth, or ante-pendium, although well
adapted for the purpose of a pall. The size of the pall is 6 feet
10 inches by 4 feet 4J inches. There is a narrow border and
intersecting line of gold tissue. This was not improbably sup-
plied by the border of the semicircular edge of the cope, to which
allusion has been made. The orphreys measure 12 feet in length
by 7 inches in width. The length may appear excessive, but it
94 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
must be recollected that it had to pass round the neck, and that
it sometimes reached to, and even rested on the ground. It is
richly worked in gold and silk upon canvas. The embroidery is
of the kind known as feather-stitch. It comprises twelve figures
of saints under canopies, a design specially characteristic of the
period to which I have assigned it. From the character of the
costumes, and of the groining, etc., of the canopies, the work is
undoubtedly Flemish.
The number twelve might lead one to infer that the Apostles
were intended to be represented, but this cannot be the case, as
some of the emblems which can be deciphered cannot be attributed
to any Apostle. The figures so far as I can decipher them are —
In the one half : —
1. Male figure, habited in a long gown, belted at the waist,
with long hanging sleeves and Flemish hood. No emblem.
2. Male figure with Gross Saltire. St. Andrew (to whom the
mother church at Wells is dedicated).
8. Male figure standing sideways, habited in a long gown,
belted at the waist and low cap. He holds a harp before him in
both hands. King David.
4. Male figure, in white gown, girded at waist, over which is a
large blue cloak or robe, caught up over the left arm. He holds
a book in the left hand, and the right hand is raised in the atti-
tude of blessing.
5. An aged man, bearded, head bare, nimbus. He wears a
loose gown, with hanging sleeves ; a book in left hand, the right
slightly raised and holding a carpenter's square resting on
shoulder. St. Matthew.
6. A bearded male figure, habited in a white gown, with
flowing blue mantle or robe, and cape covering shoulders ; high
cap with gold circlet ; large gold sceptre in left hand, leaning on
shoulder ; open book or tablets, with curved tops, Uke the repre-
sentation of the tables of the law, in right hand. Possibly
Solomon to correspond with No. 8, David, to which it is opposite,
but the tablets would suggest Moses.
On the other half : —
7. Youthful male figure, in loose gown, belted at waist, with
open hanging sleeves ; circular cap ; left arm raised from elbow,
and pointing forwards.
Ancient Cope at Yatton, Somerset. 95
8. Young male figure, in deacon's vestments ; alb, with rich
apparel of gold ; dalmatic and amice. (See Note.y
9. A bearded male figure, with white undergarment and large
blue eastern shawl or mantle, folded closely round him and held
by the right hand ; circular cap.
10. A bearded male figure, side faced, in gown of fur or hair
belted at waist; the legs are bare, and he is represented as
stepping forward with the right leg, and with the left arm
raised. St. John the Baptist.
11. Figure, in deacon's vestments, as No. 8. Emblem, the
gridiron. St. Lawrence, Deacon and Martyr.
12. A young male figure, in gown of white and gold, belted at
waist, with open hanging sleeves ; right hand, or both hands, on
breast.
I may perhaps remark that the name of the messenger en-
trusted with the bringing of the vestments from Bristol still
remains in the Parish of Tatton, under a sUghtly altered
spelling: "Beakes."
Note. — ^The samts represented as Deacons are — (1) St. Stephen,
emblem. Stones in hand. (2) St. Lawrence, Gridiron. (8)
St. Leonard, Fetters or Chains in hand. (4) St. Vincent,
L:on-spiked bed in hand or behind him, with flames be-
neath.
96 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Curiosttteis tA ^xx^ ^t^xxx%.
Bv JOHN TAYLOR, Bristol City Libeariak,
{fiead January 26M, 1886.)
One point of the superior wisdom of the East in ancient time
was the legislative registration of the people, a practice that was
not adopted by law in England until the 16th century. In the
Old Testament Scriptures there are several mentions of the
genealogies of the IsraeUtes.
Servius TuUius, in order to number the births and burials,
directed that when a child was born the kindred should bring a
piece of money into the ^rarium of Juno Lucina ; and in like
manner into the treasury of Venus Libitina (where the appliances
for funerals were sold) when any died. Also, among the ancient
Bomans, the father was obliged to enter the name of the child,
within thirty days of the birth, in the public registei*, the birth
itself being marked as on other joyful occasions, like that of mar-
riage, by adorning the threshold of his door with flowers.
Juvenal, in his ninth satire, refers to both practices in a passage
that may be judiciously left unquoted. Sir Francis Palgrave
states, though somewhat inaccurately, that Parish Begisters were
never kept in any part of the world until the 16th century. He
relates that the only mode by which at the Baptistery of Florence
an account was taken of the infants of the city, who were all
brought there to be baptized, was by dropping beans into a bag,
and casting them up at the end of the year, a practice similar in
principle to that of Servius TuUius. In monastic houses, how-
ever, it was customary to keep a mortuary roll of the inmates
and of benefactors to the brotherhood. Venerable Bede says,
with reference to Oswald, king of the Mercians, who was killed in
war with the infidels, that in ''the books wherein the departure
of the dead is set down " the day (6 Aug., A.D. 642) of his being
Curiosities of Parish Registers. 97
taken out of this world would be found recorded, that masses
might be sung for his soul.^ But this death-roll was only part
of the monastic system, and intended for the benefit, temporal
or spiritual, of the fraternity ; it had no reference to the advan-
tage of the people at large.
Till the time of the Tudors there is no reason to suppose that
any system, even so rough as that of numbering the people by
beans, was practised in England. Mr. Bums, in his valuable
History of Parish Registers, has laboriously ascertained some
instances of registration before the general order of Henry VIII.,
in 1588, when every parish priest was required to keep a book for
entering the names of all who were christened, married, and
buried within his district, with the date of each event. By the
Parish Register Abstract, pubhshed by Government, in 1880, it
appears that of 10,984 Registers then extant, 812 begin in A.D.
1538, forty of these containing entries prior to that date. The
spoliation of Parish Registers during three centuries saddens the
heart of the genealogist. Parliamentary soldiers, parish clerks,
churchwardens, and even the clergy themselves have in numerous
instances treated these important documents as if they were of no
more value than schoolboys' copy-books. At Wingfield, Cam-
bridgeshire, the leaves of the register from 1604 to 1616 were torn
out by Cromwell's troopers. The clerk of Plungar, in Leicester-
shire, was a utilitarian grocer, who converted the registers in his
care into waste paper for his commodities. With like regard to
useful purposes the early registers of the parish of Christchurch,
Hants, were destroyed (so the historian of the Huntingdon
Peerage says) by the curate's wife, who made them into kettle-
holders ; but this time the parish clerk, by timely interference,
saved the destruction from being complete. At Clifton, by Bristol,
the registers were for years given up as lost, but were finally dis-
covered at Clifton, in Oxfordshire. Besides much wilful wasting
of these documents there has been capricious neglect to make the
proper entry of names. At St. Ewe, Cornwall, the parishioners
refusing to allow five shillings annually for keeping the register,
the only entries were two baptisms that were generously inserted
by " me, Joseph May, Clerk." At Tunstall, Kent, the clergyman,
after recording, A.D. 1657, three "Mary Pottmans," got tired
of that prolific family, and finally enters the name saying:
* Bede, B. iv,, c. 14,
98 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
*' From henceforth I omit the Pottmans." Among the actual facts
which have been worked into the machinery of fiction, are the
wilful mutilations and interpolations of registers for felonious
purposes. Jasper Arnold, parish clerk of St. Andrew's Holbom,
was bribed A.D. 1718 by William Godgard, for £5, to tear leaves
from the register that contained an entry of his first marriage,
he having taken a second wife while the first was alive. They
were fined and sentenced to the pillory. At the York assizes,
William Radcliff was tried, 17 March, 1820, for having in 1801
forged in the Parish Register of Ravensfield an entry of marriage
between Edward Badcliff and Eosamunde Swyft, 24 Feb., 1640,
and for having cited that entry in a pedigree presented to the
Heralds' College, to show his descent from the ancient family of
the Radcliffs, formerly Earls of Derwentwater, with a view to
impose on the College, as well as upon the Governors of Greenwich
Hospital, in whom the forfeited estates of that noble family were
vested. Had such forgery been committed in a Parish Register of
a date subsequent to the Marriage Act of 1753, the fate of the
false Derwentwater might have been as tragical as that of the last
of the real family, for the offence would have been capital ; as it
was it was only a misdemeanour. The prisoner was fined £50,
and sentenced to three months' imprisonment in York Castle.^ A
like instance occurred in 1829, when it was discovered that the
registers of St. Peter's Comhill, and of Stoke Fleming, in Devon-
shire, had been altered to assist a claimant to the Earldom of
Peterborough.'^
It may surprise some to learn that marriage was first made an
ecclesiastical contract by Pope Innocent III, who ordered that
weddings should be celebrated by the church ; and further sanc-
tified the marriage vow by making it one of the seven sacraments.*
The civil law is somewhat at variance with the canon law with
regard to the degrees of affinity, within which it may be permitted
to marry. The vulgar saying that first cousins may wed but
second cousins may not, arises from the fact that by the common
law any couainB may marry ; but by the ecclesiastical law neither
first nor second cousins may be united. The superior authority
of the civil to the ecclesiastical legislature is shown by the former
being able to interfere between man and wife, too often finding it
necessary to break the bonds which religion has consecrated.
" Bums, 53. 3 lb. 54. ^ Blackstone Com., vol. i., 439.
Curiosities of Parish Registers. 99
Such separations were formerly however within the jurisdiction
of the Church. Not only consanguineous but spiritual relations
were at one time forbidden to intermarry. In 1462, John
Howthon, of Tonbridge, was sentenced by the consistory court
of Eochester to be whipt three times round the market and church
for having wedded Dionysia Thomas, for whom his former wife
had been godmother ; and in 1465, a dissolution of marriage be-
tween John Travenock and Joan Feckham was declared ; Letitia,
the former wife of Travenock having, been godmother to Joan.
Seasons of marriage were also subject to the appointment of
the church. By the Register of Norton (Co. Durham) we find
it stated that '' marriage comes in on the 18th of January, and
at Septuagesima Sunday it is out again until Low Sunday (the
octave or first Sunday after Easter), at which time it comes in
again, and goes not out till Eogation Sunday (that before Ascen-
sion-day) ; thence it is unforbidden until Trinity Sunday, from
thence it is forbidden till Advent, and comes not in again till ye
13 of January."^ Another prerogative of the church was the
privilege of the priest to kiss the bride. In the articles of
visitation in the diocese of London, it is set down A.D. 1554
** Then whether there be any that refuseth to kysse the priest
at the solemnization of matrimony or such like ceremonies here-
tofore used and observed in the church."®
Thus Herrick " To the Bride " :—
''If nine times you the Bridegroom kiss,
The tenth you know the parson's is ;
Pay then your tithe, &e.''
Before the Eeformation the services of baptism, matrimony,
and the churching of women were performed at the church door,
usually in the porch. In the will of Henry VI. it is directed
that there should be "on the south side of the body of the
church of Eton College, a fair large door with a porche, and the
same for christening of children and weddings." It was the
custom to arrange the marriage settlement in the porch of the
church ; and in this respect the usage seems to have been derived
from the ancient Hebrews ; Seldon in his Uxor Hebraica
(Opera HI., p. 680), asserts that nowhere else, than before the
face of, and at the door of the church, could the marriage dower,
with that people, have been lawfully assigned. Mr. EUis in his
s ChronicoD Mirabile, 62. ^ GoL Topograp. and Genealog., vol. III. p. 325.
loo Clifton Antiquarian Club.
edition of Brand's Popular Antiquities states, as an instance
of the mediaeval practice, that " Robert Pitz Roger, in the Vlth
Edward I., entered into an engagement with Robert de Tybetot,
to marry within a limited time John, his son and heir, to
Hawisia, the daughter of the said Robert de Tybetot, to endow
her at the church door on her wedding day, with lands amounting
to the value of £100 per annum." Edward I. was married with
great pomp and splendour at the door of Canterbury Cathedral ;
and to mention a later royal instance — Charles I. was wedded
by proxy at the door of Notre Dame. Chaucer's " Wife of Bath "
will, of course, occur as an illustration to the reader —
**She was a worthy woman all her live,
Husbands at the church dore had she five."
At the southern entrance of Norwich Cathedral, there is a
carved representation of a marriage. One of Douce's prints
represents a marriage solemnization at the church door. In
the Ludlow Church accounts, we find frequent reference to the
wedding door : as, '' 1560 Paid Thomas Seasons for mending
and fastening the window over the wedinge churche dore."
The porch at which the wedding was performed appears to have
been usually on the south side of the church, but at Ludlow it
was on the north side. The ancient missals instruct that at the
nuptial ceremony the bridegroom and the bride are to stay at
the door of the church, while the service is advanced to the point
where the One Hundred and Twentieth Psalm is now chaunted,
and towards the conclusion they are to enter the church as far as
to the steps of the altar.
The supposed Pagan origin of the marriage ring nearly
caused it to be abolished from the bride's finger during the
Commonwealth. Indeed, marriage within the walls of a church
was superstitious. In the register of Cirencester, 1655, it is
stated that the omission of entries of weddings over three years
was owing to the Rump Parliament at the time setting forth an
'^ Act that all Banns should be published three several market
days at the High Cross, and after such publishing, the parties to
be married by a Justice of the Peace, so that there was little
done in the churches, the said Parliament also consisting of
Anabaptists and Independents." ^ In the Register, for instance,
of St. Margaret's, Lothbury, we find, 1654, Robert Robinson,
7 Bums, 162.
Curiosities of Parish Registers. loi
Abigail Finnock, both of this parish, was published three days,
ye 2nd, ye 7th of June, in Cheapside, and married 6th July by
Alderman Andrews.® The statute of August, 1653, however,
allowed the betrothed couple to choose whether they would be
" asked " on three successive Sundays in church, or be cried in
open market, on three following market days at the town nearest
to their customary place of worship.® In Flecnoes Diarium there
is a satirical reference to the secularisation of marriage.
At Boston, Lincolnshire, the last pubUcation of banns in the
market place was made on July 1, 1659, between the statutory
hours of ten and twelve. From the registers of the same town,
it appears also, says Mr. Jeaffreson, that whilst the marriage
banns, published in open market place during 1656 and the two
next years, were as many as 814, the number of similar
announcements delivered in its church during the same years
was only 181.^® The marriage solemnized, or rather performed,
before a justice of the peace, required the appointment of a
public registrar. This officer was sworn before an alderman or
other magistrate, and in the parish books of St. Margaret's,
Lothbury, is preserved a form of the oath.^^ Oliver Cromwell
himself was married at St. Giles', Cripplegate, the entry being
" 1620, Aug. 22, Oliver Cromwell and Elizabeth Boucher." In
the entry of the marriage of the Protector's daughter in the
register of St. Martin-in-the-Fields (in the naming of which
there is a careful omission of the epithet '^ Saint "), it is said that
''Publication was made in the pubUque meeting place in the
Parish Church of Martin's-in-the-Fields, in the county of Mid-
dlesex, upon three several Lord's days, at the close of the
morning exercise, between the Hon. Bobert Bich, of Andrew's,
Holborn, and the Bight Hon. the Lady Frances Cromwell, of
Martin-in-Fields, in the county of Middlesex. The Parish
Begister at Portsmouth, is richly illuminated in celebration of the
entry of marriage of King Charles U. to the '' most illustrious
Princesse Dona Catarina, Infanta of Portugal, daughter of the
deceased Don Juan the Fourth, and sister to the present Don
Alphonso, King of Portugal," who were married at Portsmouth,
" 22nd May, 1662, by the Bight Eev. Father in God, Gilbert, Lord
Bishop of London." ^^
^ ArchcEologia, XLV. p. 98. ' Jeaffreson's Brides and BridalSy I. 190.
'° Vol. I., p. 131. " ArchcBohgia, XLV. 78. " Bunw, 161.
2
I02 Clifton Antiquartan Club.
Even so seemingly exhaustive a list of Christian names as is
to be found in Miss C. M. Yonge's two thick volumes on the
subject, might be supplemented by an examination of Parish
Registers. The reasons in many instances, could they be got at,
for the election of particular names for children would be a
curious chapter. In 1207, Maria, Queen of Aragon, considering
her infant son to have been granted to her by the special inter-
cession of the twelve Apostles, resolved to show her gratitude by
naming him after one of those scriptural saints. In modem
time, probably the whole twelve names would have been bestowed
upon the infant, but the Queen, instead of giving so many to the
child, applied them to the same number of lighted candles, as
explained in the following verses of Southey : —
Twelve waxen tapers she hath made
In size and weight the same,
And to each of these twelve tapers
Hath been given an Apostle's name ;
From that which shall bum longest
The infant his name shoidd take,
And the saint who owned it was to be
HiB patron for his name's sake.
After no such loose religious principle, but on the contrary,
one that involved no less a doctrine than that of saving grace,
did many Puritan names derive their application. At Northam,
county Sussex, appear (1588-91), Accepted and Thankful Frewen ;
in 1593 and 1629 respectively, may be found Faithful and Con-
tented Butler. At Hammersmith, A.D. 1682, there is the less
explicable name, Iszephroniah Archer, daughter of William and
Iszephroniah.^ At St. Helen's, Tryphosa Hodgson. At Bishop-
wearmouth, the daughter of Wm. Thomson was christened
Robert, owing to a drunken midwife mistakmg the sex." At
Merrington, 1701, we find Dulcibell, daughter of Tho. Carr,
chaplain to the Earl of Strafford. At Beyton, appears Affable
Battle, chaplain, buried 20 March, 1723.^^ In the Bristol
registers, occur Nigel, Sobrietas and Mirabilis. In the register of
Temple Church, in the same city, may be seen the odd name of
One-too-many. A late dignitary of Bristol Cathedral was
some years back a preacher at the above church, and on a cer-
tain morning, after the usual service, several poor women of the
'3 CoUectiona Top. and Gen. iii. 312. ^ Chron. Mirab. 75. '5 n, 61.
Curiosities of Parish Registers. 103
parish, brought their infants to be baptized. One of these
women being asked in due form, the name of the child, replied.
One-too-many, which according to her feelings of family increase
was an expression of the fact. The clergyman without appre-
hending the sense of the name, christened the infant somewhat
according to the sound, and it was not until the name came to
be entered in the vestry minutes, that he discovered the whim of
the mother.
The custom in some country parishes of calling a child by the
name of the saint on whose day he happens to be bom, is one
that, if more generally adopted, would be a self-sufficient expla-
nation of a Christian name ; and if the Bomish calendar were
used, might a£ford a copious vocabulary. We should then find
such old world names as Alban, Alcuin, Aldhelm, Eloy, Ethel-
burga, Gwendoline, Werburga, etc. A reverend contributor to
Notes and Qmries (1868), baptized a child, Benjamin Simon
Jude. On inquiring the reason of so odd a conjunction of
names, he was told that the infant was born on the festival of
St. Simon and St. Jude, and that it was always unlucky to take
the day from the child. The practice of giving foundlings the
name of the parish where they are baptized has afforded to many
of these waifs a cognomen of more prestige than properly
belonged to them, while it has helped unduly to multiply the
surnames of particular families. In the register of St. Lawrence,
Jewry, the surname of Lawrence is, or was formerly, invariably
given to the strays found within that parish ; and in the
Temple register it appears that from 1728 to 1765, no fewer than
104 foundlings were christened there, all of whom were sur-
named Temple or Templar. Had all parish officers been of the
inventive genius of Mr. Bumble, this somewhat objectionable
practice would not have been persisted in. That superior person
tells Mrs. Mann, who conducts a farm for the raising of pauper
children, that he " inwented " the idea of naming the foundlings
of the workhouse in alphabetical order. On some occasions
foundlings have been named after the thoroughfare in which
they were exposed. An instance of this occurred at Bristol,
where a female infant was christened Anne Wine Street, she
having been found in the street of that name.
I04 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
from tjbe fttonep ilLittleton 3Barroto.
By JOHN BEDDOE, M.D., F.R.S,
{Read November llth, 1886.)
The ancient tomb at Stoney Littleton belongs to that variety of
the long barrow which is called a chambered barrow or galleried
tumulus. It is not, I think, however, quite clear that these
chambered barrows differ as to the period of their erection from
other long barrows ; certainly no difference between their respec-
tive tenants has yet been made out.
This one is of considerable interest and is fortunately in a very
fair state of preservation. It is the subject of a paper by Sir
Richard Colt Hoare, in the 19th volume of the Archaologia,
which is illustrated by several careful drawings, including a
ground plan drawn to scale. This plan and one of the drawings
correctly indicate the entrance as being at the south-eastern end
of the barrow, though in the text Sir Bichard speaks of it as
** facing the north-west." ^
Our business, however, lies with the osseous contents, whereof
the, alas ! very scanty relics are in our local museum. They
' The mistake made by Sir R. C. Hoare in his original account of the barrow,
published nearly seventy years since, as to the position of the entrance, was
noticed by Sir John Maclean in a paper on Chambered Tumuli, in the Transac-
tions of the Bristol and Gloucester Archaeological Society for 1881 (vol. v. p. 109),
but had been copied by most previous writers on the subject, some of whom had
even added to the confusion. Thus both the late Thos. Wright, F.S.A., in The
Celt, the Soman, and the Saxon, and the late Llewellyun Jewitt, F.S. A., in Oraue
Mounds and their Contents, state that the entrance was on the north-west side.
Mr. Kains-Jackson in Our Ancient Atonuments and the Land around them (1880),
misquotes Sir Bichard, as follows : — '* The entrance of the tumulus faces the south
west.''* In the Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archceological and Natural History
Society for 1858, there is a ground plan on Plate 3, which shows the entrance on
the south-west, while on Plate 4 is an elevation of *' the south entrance." — £d.
Human Remains from Stoney Littleton. 105
have been described in the Crania Britannica of Davis and
Thurnam, in connexion with Thurnam's account of another famous
long barrow, that at Uley, near Dursley, but may nevertheless
furnish occasion for some further remarks.
Thurnam, following hints thrown out by Daniel Wilson and
Bateman, worked out with much ability the theory now generally
accepted, which connects the long barrows of Britain with a long-
headed race of comparatively small stature, believed to be of
Iberian kinship. The skulls found in such barrows, though nar-
row, are as a rule of good form and capacity, certainly not
smaller, perhaps even slightly larger, than the average of round-
barrow folk, or of modern Europeans. It must be remembered,
however, that these huge tumuli are almost certainly the graves
of chiefs and of their families and dependents, not of the mass
of the people, and that chiefs among barbarians owe their position
to the superior endowments of themselves or of their ancestors,
such superiority implying, on the average, greater volume of
brain. The commonalty were probably buried, if buried at all,
with very little care, and their remains have mostly perished,
just as those of the round-headed serfs of the long-headed grave-
row men must have perished out of Swabia. Dr. Henry Bird,
indeed, thinks he can recognize, in the small ill-developed skulls
occasionally found in small " tump " barrows on the Cotswold,
remains of an earlier population than that of the chambered
tumuli. It is, I think, possible that they were coeval with or
even later than the long barrows, and contain the only relics of
the servile population that have come down to us.
There is little doubt that rites analogous to the Hindu Sutti
were practised at the obsequies of chiefs in the neolithic period.^
The dependents who were put to death on these occasions must,
sometimes at least, have been inferior in cranial type to their
lords. In an undisturbed barrow it may often be possible to
distinguish by position the principal interment from the rest, the
chief from the dependent ; but the Stoney Littleton barrow had
been well rummaged and ransacked before Sir E. C. Hoare's day,
and the position of the several bones he found in it may have
been shuffled to any extent. This, however, may be affirmed,
that the fragments we have to do with were not found in the
principal chamber, and there is, therefore, some slight presump-
" See Thurnam's account of the Rodmarton barrow, in Crania Britannica,
io6 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
tion against their having belonged to the principal interment.
When the barrow was explored in 1816, by Sir R. C. Hoare and
the Bev. John Skinner, it would seem that these fragments were
not quite the only remains of the two skulls to which they
belonged. At least Mr. Skinner expressed his regret that he
could preserve no more, seeming to imply that there were other
and smaller fragments which might have been preserved and put
together, had he only known how to do so. We must, however,
be grateful to him for what he did, rather than censorious as to
what he left undone, for osseous remains had not then the in-
terest which they have for modem archaeologists. His words are,
'' Two of the skulls appear to have been almost flat, there being
little or no forehead rising above the sockets of the eyes, the
shape much resembUng those given in the works of Lavater, as
characteristic of the Tartar tribes. I wish I could have preserved
one entire ; but I have retained the upper part of two distinct
crania, which will be sufficient to confirm this remarkable fact,"
Sir B. C. Hoare speaks of '^ the two skulls discovered in this
tumulus, which appear to be totally different in their formation
from any others which our reseaxches have led us to examine,
being /ronie valde depresaiV*
Thurnam traced the fragments to our Bristol museum, and
with the assistance of our fellow-citizen, Augustine Prichard,
made a careful examination of them. His account is as follows : —
" The general resemblance of these portions of skulls to the
Uley cranium is sufficiently apparent. The frontal bone is from
the skull of a man, of not more than middle age. The frontal
sinuses and temporal ridges are unusually marked and promi-
nent. Its narrow and contracted character is very obvious, and
its peculiarly receding and flat form fully justifies the observa-
tions of Mr. Skinner and Sir Eichard Hoare. In the great extent
to which it is present, this last is probably an exceptional and in-
dividual peculiarity. As in the Uley skull, a central ridge is to
be traced along the median line. The length of this frontal bone
is 4*8 inches, its breadth 4*2 inches ; in the thickest parts it
measures the third of an inch. The length of this skull must
have fallen short of that of the skull from Uley, the length of
the frontal bone being one inch less ; the elongation of this bone
in the Uley skull being most unusual. The defective calvarium
consists of the frontal bone, the greater part of the right, and a
Human Remains from Stoney Littleton. 107
smaller portion of the left parietal bone. It has probably formed
part of the skull of a female, of rather advanced age.. The
frontal sinuses, temporal ridges, and other features are much
less defined and prominent. The forehead is narrow and reced-
ing, but less so than the former. The tendency in the form of
this skull has clearly been to narrowness and elongation. The
length of the frontal bone is 4*9 inches, the breadth 4*5 inches ;
the greatest thickness is a quarter of an inch."
Dr. Thumam does not mention the lower jaw which accom-
panies the other relics of Stoney Littleton in the Bristol Museum.
This may or may not have belonged to the owner of either of the
skulls of which we have portions ; if to either, it was probably to
the woman, though the teeth are too little eroded for a person at
all advanced in life. The mandible is imperfect, but there is enough
of it to show that the chin was narrow and angular, and the
alveolar arch oval rather than round.
There can be little doubt that Dr. Thumam was right in
attributing one of the skuU-firagments to a man, and the other
and larger one to a woman. His measurements and mine, which
follow, are pretty nearly in accord : they are all in inches.
Length of
frontal.
Uin. bmdtli
offnmteL
Steplunic
bnadtlt.
Uudmam
Pwietal
bnultli.
Stoney Littleton,
m.
4-9 (?)
3-7
4-8
>>
f.
50
8-7
4-4
5-2 (?)
Micheldean
ms.
4-02
4-72
6-6
99
fs.
8-85
4.55
5-6
Gloucester
ms.
8-82
6-5
I have here compared these fragments with the skulls of people
most likely to be akin to their ancient owners. The Gloucester
skulls mentioned are those of Mr. John Bellows's find, and are of
the Boman period ; the Micheldean ones are medisBval, from the
ossuary there. It will be observed that the measurements of our
fragments are small, except the length of the frontal, which is
about equal to the average of European races. The skulls were
therefore probably of fair length, but narrow and decidedly low,
especially the male one, containing, we may be certain, but small
brains. Li this most important respect they differ from the
ordinary long-barrow type ; and in the lowness of the forehead,
coupled, in the case of the male, where it is most marked, with
great prominence of the brows and frontal sinuses, they approach
io8 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
more nearly to the Ganstatt type, that to which the famous
Neanderthal skull belongs. Sir Richard Hoare had opened
several long-barrows ; and though he had found in them little
that interested him, had probably seen some typical long-barrow
skulls ; yet the form of these Stoney Littleton foreheads, '' these
foreheads villanous low," seems to have struck him as a novelty,
as something quite peculiar. Dr. Thumam compares them to
the only perfect adult skull that was got from the chambered
tumulus at Uley ; but the forehead in that one, as he himself
says, though narrow and contracted, was not low ; and its cubical
contents were eight or nine per cent, over the average of ancient
British or modern English crania. In truth, Thurnam was per-
haps a Uttle biassed towards seeing this likeness ; he had started
his valuable theory about the connexion of long-barrows with a
long-headed race, and was on the watch for resemblances of this
sort.
In the absence of certainty, we must fall back on conjecture.
We have here, I suppose, the remains of a male and female serf,
not unlikely a brother and sister, sacrificed, it may be, at the
obsequies of a neoUthic chieftain, or at the least buried in his
tomb ; their blood may have been the same with his, or it may
have been that of an earlier, lowlier endowed, and subjugated
race.
f
^
Oil a Romano-British Interment. 109
^n a 3^omano=3Sritifift Xnterment,
titscoberetr at Jfarmborouj^.
By ALFRED E. HUDD, P.S.A., Hon. Skcrbtary.
{Read November lUh, 1886.)
In October last, one of our Members, Mr. A. C. Pass, received a
letter from a friend residing near Gamerton, in which it was stated
that a few days previously a large stone coffin had been found in a
field near Farmborough, Somerset, some particulars of which
were given, and a kind offer was made to meet him and any
other member of our Club, at the nearest railway station, should
it be thought worth while to investigate the discovery. Accord-
ingly, a few days afterwards, Mr. Pass and I proceeded to Glutton
by a morning train, and there found our friend's carriage awaiting
our arrival, in which he drove us to Barrow Vale Farm, near which
the coffin had been found. The farmer, Mr. Stephen Butler, in-
formed us that about a fortnight before our visit, while his men
were ploughing a field, the progress of the plough was inter-
rupted by a large stone. On attempting to remove this with a crow-
bar it proved to be the cover of a large stone coffin, which they broke
into several pieces and removed, when, finding inside a second
coffin, of lead, they opened that also, and searched over the con-
tents hoping to discover some rings, coins, or other valuables.
Not finding anything worth taking away, they replaced the frag-
ments of the lid, and covered the whole with earth, which was
afterwards ploughed over. Mr. Butler told us that though there
was nothing to be seen except a slight depression in the ground,
he could point out the spot, at a place called "Hobbs's Wall,"
a few fields from his house. On reaching this place we succeeded
in persuading Mr. Butler to have the remains again uncovered
for our inspection ; and with the assistance of three men, the con-
tents of the grave were soon opened out to our view.
First appeared, about six inches under the surface, a stone cover
no Clifton Antiquarian Club.
of oolite, measuring eight feet long, and about three feet wide
at the widest part. When first found this was a single slab, but
it had been broken into several pieces by the men, and a portion,
which they had not replaced, was lying in an adjacent quarry.
On raising the cover we found that the interior of the stone sar-
cophagus was completely filled with a second coffin, of lead. The
upper portion of this leaden shell was easily removed, owing to
circumstances to be presently stated, and we then found that the
contents had been very much disturbed and destroyed when the
coffin had been opened in the previous week. The men told us
that when first opened it contained a nearly perfect human
skeleton, partially embedded in a fine yellowish clay,^ which had
probably penetrated through the interstices of the covers of the
coffins. In their search for valuables the men trampled upon the
contents of the coffins and managed to completely smash the
skull and most of the larger bones. They then replaced the re-
mains in the leaden coffin, filled it with earth from the ploughed
field, leaving above ground only some fragments of the covering
stone, as before stated.
The sarcophagus was placed exactly north and south, the head
to the north. Nothing whatever was found inside to throw any
light on the nature of the interment, and there was no trace of
inscription, ornament, or marking of any kind either on the lead
or stone. The sarcophagus rested on the lias rock, nearly three
feet below the surface of the field.
The nature of the soil, a tenacious lias clay, with which the
remains had been mixed up, made it difficult to examine the con-
tents of the coffin ; but so far as our examination went, there
appeared to be nothing but a few fragments of bone.
As Mr. Butler wanted to plant his wheat in the field and could
not keep the grave open after we had inspected the remains, *he
removed the lead to his house, and re-covered the remainder with
soil as before.
The following description of the coffin may be of interest : The
stone sarcophagus, formed from a single block of Bath stone
(oolite), measured 7 feet long, about 2 feet 4 inches wide at the
* Several Roman coffins have been found partiaUy fiUed with lime, gypsum, or
some similar substance, upon which the bodies were laid ; but the yeUowish
material found at the bottom of this sarcophagus was not of this nature. No lime
has been found in the numerous Roman coffins which have been discovered near
Bath. See Prot, Som, ArckU Soc», vol. V., p. 65.
/
On a Romano-British Interment. 1 1 1
shoulders, and 1 foot 11 inches at the foot. There was no step
or cavity for the head, as in mediaeval stone cofiGbas, the cist being
simply and roughly hollowed out to a depth of about 1 foot 8
inches to contain the leaden shell, which fitted it tightly. The
stone cover, also of oolite, and originally formed of a single block,
measured 8 feet in length, by 8 feet at the shoulders, and had a
neatly cut flange or projecting edge about 2 inches in depth,
which fitted over the four sides of the sarcophagus ; instead of
being fiat on its upper surface, as is usually the case with the
covers of the Romano-British sarcophagi, this example is of
the coped form more common in mediaeval times, its central
ridge being rather higher at the head, which was roughly rounded
oflf, than at the foot, where it was bevelled off, leaving a triangular
sloping end. Another peculiar feature of this hd when first
found was the presence of a couple of iron handles or clamps,
firmly fixed into the stone on either side, about 8^ feet from its
smaller end, apparently for the purpose of lifting it. These had
been knocked off by the men when the stone was uncovered, and
one of them is now in my possession; it is so Uttle rusted that
we were under the impression at the time that it could not be of
great age. The Eev. Prebendary Scarth states that,^ " clamps of
iron seem to be peculiar to the later Boman period," and he
mentions instances on coffins found at York and London. In the
latter it was thought that the clamping was probably added at a
later period, which may also have been the case with the Farm-
borough example. The leaden coffin has since, by kind permis-
sion of the landowner, been sent to Bristol. Like Boman leaden
coffins found elsewhere, this seems to have been cast in thick
sheets by pouring molten lead on a level floor, and it has not been
rolled. The sheet of lead thus formed measured about 8 feet 6
inches by 8 feet 8 inches, and weighed about 2 cwt. The coffin
was then formed by cutting four pieces about a foot square from
each corner, turning up the edges, and fusing the ends to the
sides — ^probably with red-hot iron — Cleaving the top sheet or lid
to be fastened, to the upper edges of the sides and ends after the
body had been placed within. When we first saw it we were
under the impression that the leaden cover '' fitted on like the
lid of a pill-box," as it had been described to us ; but on ex-
amining it more closely we feel certain that the cover has been
'Proc. Soin. ArchK 5'oc.,.1854, p. 67.
1 1 2 Clifton Antiquarian Club,
cut through most carefully about a couple of inches below
the joint on all four sides, probably by some former explorer.
Stone coffins of undoubted Boman date, similcu: to this in
shape, size, and material, and covered with large stone lids, have
been found at Bath,* at Caerleon,* and elsewhere; but large
leaden coffins contained within Eoman sarcophagi are very un-
usual. In a description of the Ancient Sepulchral Remains
discovered in and around Bath, the Rev. Prebendary Scarth says,^
'' Leaden coffins of the Boman period are not unfrequent in this
country, but in no case, it is believed, have they been found placed
in a receptacle of stone." The recent discovery at Barrow Farm
is not however the only case of the kind that has been recorded.
In Butter's Somerset^ is an account of a large freestone coffin,
with a lid, shaped to the body, excavated from a solid block, found
in the year 1828, about a foot underground, in a field at Wem-
berham, Yatton. It contained, besides bones of a skeleton,
some parts of a lead coffin. One found in Kent is recorded by
Hasted,*^ the lead coffin being in six pieces, put together without
solder, and enclosed in a coffin of stone. A Boman sarcophagus,
containing an ornamental leaden coffin, was found in London in
1853, and is described by Mr. Hawkins in the Archaological
Journal?
A stone coffin lined with lead, found at Crowle, Worcestershire,
is mentioned by Dr. Nash,® who supposed it was Danish ; and a
large Boman sarcophagus lined with lead, found at Gaerwent in
1854, is described and figured by Mr. Octavius Morgan, F.S.A.,
in the Archaeological Journal}^ Dr. J. Collingwood Bruce, to whom
I forwarded a short account of the late find, kindly sent me a
copy of a paper he had pubUshed on A Roman Burial at York,
in which he states that " the remains were enclosed externally in
a large stone coffin of sandstone, roughly carved, and destitute of
inscription or ornament ; this was lying north and south. With-
in the stone coffin was another of lead, which contained the body.
The lead of this coffin had been cast in sheets and not rolled."
There can be no doubt, I think, that these Farmborough coffins
had been opened previous to their recent exposure ; and it has been
3 Scarth, Aqua Solis, p. 75, and Som. Arcid, Proc., vol. V,
-♦ Isca S'durum, pp. 23, 24, figs. 7, 8, 9. * Proc, Som. Archl, Soc.^ vol. V., p. 67.
* Delineationa of N, W, Somerset (1829), p. 70. J History of Kent., vol. III., p. 615.
® Archl Journal, vol. X., p. 255. » Nash's Worcestershire.
'" Archl, Journal, vol. XII. pp. 76, 78.
On a RomanO'-British Interment. 1 1 3
suggested that the very careful and painstaking manner in which
the lead had been cut all round, indicates the work of one who
wished to examine the contents with the smallest possible amount
of damage to the coffins themselves. As the site is within three
or four miles of Camerton, the home of the late Kev. John
Skinner, whose antiquarian researches are weU-known. it may
possibly have been examined by that gentleman. I have recently
spent some hours in searching through the MSS left by Mr.
Skinner to the Bath Literary and Philosophical Institution, in the
vain hope of finding some record of the discovery of a Koman
sarcophagus at Farmborough. It is however quite possible, so
extensive were Mr. Skinner's operations in this neighbourhood,^!
that a record may yet turn up, giving particulars of the first
discovery and contents of these coffins. There are, I believe,
some of his MSS in the British Museum which may throw light
on the subject.
As to the date of the interment, I may say that both Dr. Bruce,
and the Eev. Prebendary Scarth consider it to be late Roman,
while Mr. C. Roach Smith, F.S.A., inclines to the opinion that
the remains are " early post Roman." The last-named antiquary
writes : '^ the leaden coffin is made not unlike the Roman, but
void of any ornamentation. Moreover, RoTnan interments of this
kind are usually accompanied with funereal vessels and other
objects. The name of the field, Hobbs's Wall, is suggestive of
antiquity. Is there any history or tradition connected with the
place?"
I am not aware of any " history or tradition " that throws
any light upon the name Hobbs's Wall, or Hobbs's Well as it is
also called, but the place is close to the Barrow hills, near which
some pre-historic interments were found by Mr. Skinner, and is
only a short way from the great Roman road from Ilchester to
Bath and Lincoln, the Foss. In the case of the Roman coffin
discovered at Wemberham, near Yatton, considerable remains of
a Roman villa were afterwards found ^^ a few yards from the spot.
It is not improbable that similar remains may be yet discovered
not far from Hobbs's Wall.
" He found many Roman remams in the neighbourhood of Camerton (which he
considered to be the site of Camerlodunum), including upwards of 1|800 Roman
coins, most of which are now in the Bristol Museum.
" Proceedings Socielt/ of Antiquaries, 1886, pp. 29—32.
1 1 4 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
fi,tsxt% on indent ^orbegtan W^^^tw
(" 8TAVEKIKKEB,") WITH SOME NOTICES OF 8IMILAE EABLT
8TBUCTTTBES IN GBEAT BBITAIN AND IRELAND.
By FRANCIS FOX TUCKETT, F.R.G.S.
{Read December 15th, 1886.)
During a journey in Norway last summer I was much interested
in visiting for the first time several of the curious and very
ancient wooden churches which, with occasional repairs and
alterations, have been preserved for six or seven centuries, and
stiU seem likely to outUve many far more recent structures of
stone. But little is known of their origin, and, though referred
to by Pergusson, Buskin, Freeman, and possibly other writers,
the work of Prof. Dahl^ is the only one specially devoted to them
with which I have met, and I am mainly indebted to it for such
details as I am able to lay before you in dealing with this part of
my subject.^ I venture, however, to hope that, with the help
also of the accompanying illustrations,* I may be able to convey
some idea of structures which, however different in construction
and ornamentation, may remiad us of, and perhaps throw some
light on, the earUer but long vanished specimens of our native
' Denkmale einer ansgebildeten Holzbaukunst aas den frilhesten Jahrhundertea
iu den innern Landachaften Norwegens, Dresden, 1837.
' Passages quoted without special reference are from Prof. Dahl's book.
3 My grateful acknowledgments are due to A. H. H. Murray, Esq., for his great
kindness in permitting me the use of the illustrations (from Mr. Fergusson's
Handbook of Architecture), of the churches of Hitterdal and Umses (Plate I.
figs. 2, 3, and 4), and to B. Lovett, Esq., on behalf of the " Religious Tract
Society," for that of the church of Borgnnd (fig. 1), which appears in his charming
volume, Norwegian Pictures, Those on Plate XV. are reproductions by photo-
lithography, on a reduced scale, of some of the plates in Prof. Dahl's valuable
work referred to above, and to which I am in other respects so largely indebted.
Ancient Norwegian IVooden Churches. 1 1 5
wooden ecclesiastical architecture, and prove not altogether un-
worthy of your attention.
"It is not often," remarks Prof. Dahl, " that the use of wood in
architecture for common purposes has developed into a higher
and decorative style, and still more seldom have specimens of
such development, dating from an early age, been preserved to
our day.
" The * Stavekirker,' of Norway, seem to have arisen from a
combination of various elements. The influence of Latin Chris-
tian architecture in certain decorative details, such as the
cushion capital, is not easily to be mistaken, whilst in others
the design points to still earlier northern and heathen models.
It is clear that the old Scandinavians had not only a poetry
but a plastic art of their own, of which some notion may be
formed from the appearance of the ancient wooden residences
of the kings or jarls in the earliest times, if, indeed, this art
be not imitated from a foreign and ancestral style. In the
plan, Byzantine tendencies, which the intercourse of the Norsk
Varangians, or body guards of the eastern emperors,* through
Bussia sufficiently accounts for, are observable, but variously in-
fluenced by the special material made use of, which obviously
both requires and permits much that is incompatible with the
employment of stone or brick.
" These characteristics, however, are not only to be met with in
public buildings, but are even more conspicuous, especially in
remote districts, in the dwellings, furniture, and costume of the
natives. Compare the curious interlaced patterns on the portals,
and the carvings on the capitals of the pillars, as well as on the
pillars themselves.
" In this way, then, a special style was developed which was
peculiar to the northern lands; for though in Germany the
earliest churches were built of wood, in the absence of undoubted
examples it must remain uncertain whether they were similar in
character.
" Most of these structures have undergone from time to time,
by enlargement and repairs, some modification of their original
form. In the more isolated districts, however, the inhabitants
troubled themselves less about so-called improvements, and this
has contributed to the maintenance of their ancient characterise
4 See Gibbon, Wm. Smith's edition, vol. vii. pp. 20, and 80—83.
1 1 6 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
tics. These buildings were often only chapels of ease in which
service was performed but a few times in the year, and their
maintenance was dependent either on the commune or private
individuals. But httle, therefore, or only what was absolutely
essential, was done to maintain them, and this was often limited
to an external coatiag of the boards with tar, which materially
contributed to their preservation. During repair the leading
features, partly from want of knowledge, partly from the force
of habit, and partly, we may suppose, from superstition, were
retained. Sometimes, in quite new buildings, the old boards
with their carved work are nailed on, and made to do duty
again; and also, when ancient churches have been enlarged
and their former decorations removed, these have been subse-
quently replaced. It was in the interest, too, of the owner of
the church to do as little as possible to it, because the sum
to be expended was frequently larger than that which the
building produced. For when, during the reformation, under
the Danish rule, all church property was confiscated and the
income reduced, the churches often became the property of
private individuals. As a consequence, the proprietors were fre-
quently changed, and thus it has happened that at sales where
there were few buyers, an entire church, with altar, bells, and
fittings, has been sold for 30 Norsk specie dollars (about £6 15s.
sterling), and that, too, rather from religious sentiment than from
any idea of profit. For, looking at the fact that the owner is
under an obUgation to maintain the fabric, its possession becomes
a burden.
" The most closely allied structures are probably the Kussian
country churches, as Olearius observed them in the 17th century,
but it is to be noted that differences in the form of worship and
former restoration could not admit of true uniformity. In fact,
the Eussian village churches resemble in their construction
ordinary log houses, as the beams lie horizontally, one above
another, whilst, in the ancient Norwegian structures, the boards
stand upright, and they are therefore named * stave,' or * brush-
wood' churches (* Stave,' or * Eeiseverk,' Kirker.) "
Of the dozen or more existing specimens of the ancient
" Stave-Kirker," one, that of Gol in the Hallingdal, has been
removed to the grounds of the royal castle of Oscarshall near
Christiania ; a second is in the possession of Herr Gade, the
fi9'-
OhuTclL of Borgund, Lierdal. (From Lovetft "NorwegiaH Picture*" RtligUnu ^aet SotieiyJ.
PLATE XIV,
fys.
Chuich of Hitterdal, Thelemarben. (Frtmt F«rgtu»on'» "Mandhoot of
Architeetvre," John Mtirraj/.J
Chnrobat HittenUl. (D')
Chnnli of Unues, Sognefjord flhm Ferguum'i "Mandbooi of
ArcMlMtare," John Murray. J
Ancient Norwegian IVooden Churches, ny
American consul at Bergen, who has re-erected it on his estate of
Fantoft ; and a third, from LsBrdalsoren, was sold some years
ago to the King of Prussia, and is now in Silesia. I have seen in
all six, those of Borgund (Plate XTV. fig. 1), UmaBs (fig. 4), and Vik
in the neighbourhood of the Sogne Fjord, those of Yaage and
Lom in the Ottadal on the way to Bodsheim, Jotunheim, and
Galdhopigen, (the highest summit of the Ymes Fjeld and of
Norway,) and that of Gol at Oscarshall. One of the most remark-
able of all is that of Hitterdal (Plate XTV. figs. 2 and 8) in Thele-
marken. The ancient church of Borgund, with its separate and
much later " Klockstapel," or belfry (whose bell bears the name
of St. Laurentius and the date 1663), reminding one of that of
Coventry, is no longer used, and has become the property of
the Antiquarian Society of Ghristiania. The interiors were, at
least originally, mostly very obscure, with but few, and those
small, windows. In some (Borgund and UrnsBs), the roof still
remains perfectly open, while in others (Lom and Hitterdal)
a plain ceiling has been interposed, which greatly diminishes
the picturesque effect of the interior. Of the fantastic ex-
teriors it is not easy to give a very intelligible description, and
reference to the accompanying illustrations (Plates XTV. and XV.) ,
will convey a better idea than any words of the external gallery or
arcade (" Lop ")> the numerous gables, the shingle covered roofs
and walls, themselves coated with thick and ancient layers of
tar and surmounted by conventional dragons' heads, the
portal surrounded with elaborately intertwined monsters —
'' Gorgons, and Hydras, and Chimseras dire."
On the west door of the church at Borgund are two Bunic
inscriptions —
*^ Thorir raist runar thissar than Olau missoy*
(Thorir wrote these lines on St. Olaf s fair) and
*' Thittai kirkia a kirkiuvelli.**
(This church in the chui'ch ground)
Though the ancient church (Plate XIV. fig. 4), charmingly
situated several hundred feet above the water, on the verdant
promontory of Urnses, upon the eastern side of the great Sogne
Fjord, is by no means so picturesque in its construction, at least
externally, as those of Borgund, Lom, Hitterdal, Gol, &c., and
its original form has been somewhat modified by later additions,
it is still highly interesting and remarkable on account of the nume-
3
ii8 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
rous fragments which have been preserved both internally and ex-
ternally. Apparently the exterior boards and pillars of the entire
building were at one time covered with sculptured bas-reliefs (Plate
XV. figs. 1 and 4). Prof. Dahl is of opinion that most of the old
wooden churches were covered with carvings not only on the
portals (Plate XY. figs. 2, 8, 6, 6, 7), but also on the gables, posts,
and walls, but, in the course of repeated repairs with new un-
decorated planks and pillars, these have generally disappeared.
Though the interior of the building at UrnsBS was much
modified in the 16th and 17th centuries, the massive wooden
colunms and their cushion capitals have been preserved, and
show a Byzantine character (Plate XV. fig 8), " the carvings re-
sembling the designs in the Bible of Charles the Bold of the
9th century, and similar ornaments of ancient Greek MSS. of
the same period." The carving on the doors, doorposts, (Plate
XV.) capitals, &c., shows the utmost variety, no two being alike.
The question has been raised whether these decorations, at
times heathen in character, may not have been, at least in some
instances, rescued from still older structures of the pagan period,
and utilized for the adornment of the Christian churches. If
this be so their interest is only heightened and rendered more
mysterious. In this connection we may remember the instruc-
tions of St. Gregory the Great to St. Augustine of Canterbury :
** If the temples of the idols are well built, it is requisite that
they be converted from the worship of devils to the service of
the true God.''^
No records exist giving any precise information as to the age
of the " Stavekirker,'* ^ and though there is a local tradition at
Borgund that the church there dates from the year 1073, it is
probable that both it and those at Urnaes, Lom, Hitterdal, etc.,
were erected in the 12th or 13th centuries.
**In consequence of the loss of Ufe on the occasion of the
burning of the Gruekirke early in this century, through the
door only opening inwards, a law was passed that all church
doors should open outwards, and, in carrying out this, grievous
destruction was wrought both to stone and wooden structures."
5 Appendix A.
^ Except that on one of the doorposts of the church of Tind, there is a two-
line Runic inscription, stating that *' Bishop Rainar dedicated this chnrch," etc.
As Rainar, or Kagnar, was the third Bishop of Hammer on the Mjosen Lake,
from 1180 to 1190, the church would appear to date from the last quarter of the
12th century.
Plate XV.
N. Doorway of CTuirch., Urrues
Ancient Norwegian IVooden Churches. 1 1 9
The dimensions of the '^ Stavekirker " are not large, that of
Borgond (Plate XIV. fig. 1) having a nave 89 feet in length, and a
circular apse of 16 feet. The Hitterdal Church (figs. 2 and 8) is 84
feet long by 57 feet wide. That of UmsBS (fig. 4), porch (or
gallery), 8 feet; nave, 81 J feet by 28 J^ feet; chancel, 21 J feet by
16 feet ; and the vestry ( ? ) behind, 10 feet long by 16 feet
wide.
Mr. Buskin^ remarks, " The changes effected by the Lombard
are more curious still, for they are in the anatomy of the building
more than in its decoration. The Lombard architecture repre-
sents the whole of that of the northern barbaric nations. And
this, I believe, was at first an imitation in wood of the Christian
Boman churches or basilicas It (the basilica) had a nave
and two aisles, the nave much higher than the aisles ; the nave
was separated from the aisles by rows of shafts, which supported,
above, large spaces of fiat or dead wall, rising above the aisles,
and forming the upper part of the nave, now called the cle-
restory, which had a gabled wooden roof. These high dead walls
were, in Boman work, built of stone ; but, in the wooden work
of the North, they must necessarily have been made of horizontal
boards or timber attached to uprights on the top of the nave
pillars, which were themselves also of wood. Now, these
uprights were necessarily thicker than the rest of the timbers,
and formed vertical square pilasters above the nave piers. As
Christianity extended, and civilization increased, these wooden
structures were changed into stone, but they were literally
petrified, retaining the form which had been made necessary by
their being of wood. The upright pilaster above the nave pier
remains in the stone edifice, and is the first form of the great
distinctive feature of Northern architecture — the vaulting shaft."
In Appendix 9 to the same volume, Mr. Buskin says : '' I cannot
pledge myself to this theory of the origin of the vaulting shaft,
but the reader will find some interesting confirmation of it in
Dahl's work on the wooden churches of Norway. The inside
view of the church of Borgund shows the timber construction of
one shaft, run up through a crossing architrave, and continued
into the clerestory, while the church of UrnsBs is in the exact
form of a basilica ; but the wall above the arches is formed of
planks with a strong upright above each capital."
7 Tht Stones of Venice, vol. I., ohsp. I., § xxvil
I20 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Fergusson^ remarks: ''There exists in Norway a series of
wooden churches of great interest to the antiquary, which are
now fast disappearing from that country. Everywhere we read
of the wooden churches of Saxon and Norman times in our
country, and of the contemporary periods on the continent ; but
these have ahnost all been either destroyed by fire or pulled down
to make way for more solid and durable erections. That at
Little Greensted, in Essex, is almost the only specimen remaining
in this country.
" The largest of those now to be found in Norway is that of
Hitterdal. It is 84 feet long by 57 feet across. Its plan is that
usual in churches of the age, except that it has a gallery all
round on the outside. (Plate XIV. fig. 2). Its external appear-
ance is very remarkable, and very unlike anything in stone
architecture. It is more like a Chinese pagoda or some strange
creation of the South Sea islanders, than the sober production of
the same people who built the bold and massive round Gothic
edifices of the same age.
'' Another of these churches, that at Borgund, is smaller, but
even more fantastic in its design, and with strange carved
pinnacles at its angles, which give it a very Chinese aspect.
" That at UmsBS (Plate XIV. fig. 4), is both soberer and better
than either of these, but much smaller, being only 24 feet wide
by 65 feet from E. to W. It still retains a good deal of the Bunic
carving that once probably adorned all the panels of the exterior
(Plate XV. fig. 1), as well as the various parts of the roof; as
these decayed, they seem to have been replaced by plain timbers,
which of course detract very much from the original appear-
ance. All the doorways and principal openings are carved with
the same elaborate ornaments, representing entwined dragons
fighting and biting each other, intermixed occasionally with
foliage and figures. (Plate XV. figs. 2, 8, 5, 6, 7.)
'' This style of carving is found in crosses and tombstones, not
only in Scandinavia, but in Scotland and Ireland. In its original
form in wood, it is only known to exist in these singular churches.
'' There can be no doubt about the age of these curious edifices,
for not only does the dragon tracery fix them to the 11th or 12th
century, but the capitals of the pillars and general character
of the mouldings exactly correspond with the details of our
' Handbook of Architecture^ 2Dd Edition, p. 933.
Ancient Norwegian IVooden Churches. 121
own Norman architecture, so far as the difference of material
permits.
"With the churches at Wisby (in Gothland), these wooden
churches certainly add a curious and interesting chapter to the
history of architecture at the early period to which they belong,
and are well deserving of more attention than they have re-
ceived."
The Curator of the Bergen Museum is, I believe, of opinion
that some of the intertwined patterns are derived from Irish
sources, and this may well be the case, considering the prolonged
ravages and settlements of Vikings in that country.^ It must,
however, be borne in mind^^ that "all comparative study of
national and primitive forms of decorative art, seems to show that
such distinctive terms as ' Bunic ' and ' Celtic ' applied to
interlaced patterns, knots, and fretwork have been too confi*
dently used. Such designs are found in Archaic art in most
parts of the world, and still appear in the native work of Japan
and India."
As already hinted. Pagan and Christian symbolism seems to
have been combined in their production—
*' New things and old co-twisted, as if Time
Were nothing."
Great Britain and Ireland. — ^Mr. Petrie ^^ considers that many
of the smaller and very ancient Irish chapels were constructed of
wood, and the whole class was known as " Duirtheachs " or " Der-
theachs," the probable meaning of which is " house of oak."
According to a fragment of a commentary on Brehon law,^^ 15
feet by 16 feet were customary dimensions for such buildings,
and the stone chapels are usually found not to differ very greatly
from them." On this point, however. Miss Stokes^* remarks: "The
belief that the early churches of Ireland were generally of wood
is much shaken by the evidence of the monuments themselves, as
well as by the testimony of the oldest Irish writers. The virgin
Crumtheris is described as living in a stone-built oratory near
Armagh in the 5th century, and we find stone buildings men-
tioned as erected in parts of the country where wood must have
9 See Appendix B.
"> Early Christian ArchUeetwrt in Ireland, by Margaret Stokes, p. 125.
" The Ecclesiastical Architecture of Ireland, p. 343. " Petrie, p. 365.
'3 See further, Smith's Dictionary qf Christian Antiquities, vol. I. pp. 342-3.
'* Op. cit. , p. 36.
122 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
been quite as easily attainable as stone, if not more so; for
instance, in the Marty rology of Donegal, (p. 96), St. Becan is
described as building a cashel at Emlagh, in East Meath, for
which stone was evidently the material chosen It may
be suggested also that those passages so often quoted from Bede
and William of Malmesbury, in which it is said that most of the
oratories of the Scotic saints were formed of wattles of wood and
clay, may be merely applicable to the erections of the first Irish
teachers in Scotland and the north of England. Their buildings,
like the tent of the nomad, or the temporary shed of the foreign
missionary at the present day, might naturally have been of
some less permanent material than they would use for that
church in their native land, near which they might hope to
spend their life and await their death. However this may be,
we have, at all events, sufficient evidence that, even in the very
earliest times, wood was not the only material employed. " "
It should be noted that these Irish chapels seem always to
have been small and quadrangular, and, even when chancels were
added, the arrangement was not apsidal — a peculiarity which
has subsequently prevailed in the British Isles, and distinguishes
our churches from continental structures, including several of the
" Stavekirker."
In connection with the question of the material of Irish
churches and chapels or oratories, it may be noted that the
church at Glastonbury, founded, according to tradition, by a
saint of the name of Patrick, but undoubtedly by missionaries
from Ireland, was said to have been 60 feet long by 26 feet broad,
and seems to have been of wood.
As to Scotland, it is held that the churches constructed by the
Christian Picts were probably either of wood or of earth, which
would account for the entire absence of any buildings within
their territory of earlier date than 800.
Coming to England, it would appear that no certain remains
of any building, except Boman, (though churches of considerable
size, existed), prior to the invasion of the Saxons, Jutes and
Angles, have been met with. Parker ^^ says : "When the Saxons
were converted to Christianity they were not masons ; they dwelt
in wooden houses, and there can be no doubt that their churches
's Appendix C.
»* An introdn4ition to the Stxuiy of Oothic Architecture, p. 9.
Ancient Norwegian IVooden Churches. 123
were also usually of wood. This is confirmed by numerous pas-
sages in contemporary historians, and the frequent mention of
the destruction of churches by fire."
The charter granted by King Eadgar to Mahnesbury Abbey in
974 states that the churches were " visibly ruinated, with moul-
dering shingles and worm eaten boards even to the rafters."
Again Cnut's charter to Glastonbury Abbey in 1082, is dated
from the wooden church there.
I may next refer to the well known story in Bede (Book III.
chap. 17), of the post of the church on which Bishop Aidan was
leaning when he died, and which could not be burned when the
rest of the building was consumed by fire. In Chapter 25 of
the same book he says : '^ In the meantime. Bishop Aidan being
dead, Finan, who was ordained and sent by the Scots, succeeded
him in the bishopric, and built a church in the Isle of Lindis-
farne, the episcopal see ; nevertheless, after the manner of the
Scots (a name at any rate including the Irish) , he made it, not of
stone, but of hewn oak, and covered it mth reeds ; and the same
was afterwards dedicated in honour of St. Peter the Apostle, by
the Reverend Archbishop Theodore. Eadbert, also bishop" of
that place, took off the thatch and covered it, both roof and walls,
with plates of lead."
The reference in Bede to Benedict Biscop crossing the sea
into Gaul, and carrying back with him masons to build " a stone
church in the Roman mannei'" and, again ^^ " He (Naitan, king of
the Picts) also prayed to have architects sent him to build a
church in his nation after the Roman manner^ promising to dedi-
cate the same in honour of St. Peter," seems to imply that " the
Eoman manner," referred not merely to style but also to a mate-
rial different from those in use at that time in England.^^
The " pilaster strips," so conspicuous on the [tower of Earl's
Barton church, Northamptonshire, and the use of the baluster as
a shaft, are further indications, '' pointing clearly to their having
originated in an indigenous style of wooden architecture." '^ The
same writer mentions that according to Conchubean, an Irish
author of the 11th century, " the Scots were accustomed to build
with boards, (' tdbvlis dedolatis,') or, as we may perhaps understand
the passage, with timbers not left in the round, but smoothed
'' Hist. EccUb,, Book V., chap. 21. «» Appendix D.
'» Mr. A. Kesbett in Smith's Didionary of Chrwtian An6iquiUe8, vol. I. p. 388.
124 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
with the adze. In this way the church at Greensted near
Ongar, Essex, was constructed, the slabs of oak left after a plank
had been sawn out of the middle, being smoothed on the inside
with the adze, and placed upright with the curved portion out-
wards, side by side, so as to form a wall."** Prof. E. A. Free-
man '^ says tersely, '' A Saxon tower, in short, is an Italian cam-
panile in timber, and then turned into stone."
Looking at the peculiar flat pilasters and arcading of St.
Aldhelm's church of St. Lawrence, at Bradford-on-Avon, which
are only surface decorations without structural importance, one
is tempted to fancy that one sees in them a sort of sterile ^' ex-
ample" of an arrangement which, in the " Stavekirker" of Norway,
served the useful purpose of shelter and protection from snow and
rain. Is it fanciful, too, to trace a possible connection between such
a structure as the lovely octagon or "tombhouse," (Fergusson),
which occupies the usual place of a '^ Lady chapel " in the won-
derfully interesting cathedral at Throndhjem, and the curious
eastern termination of the Stavekirker of Borgund and Hitterdal ?
This octagon is externally Early English in character, and has
somewhat the appearance of a chapter house, whilst '' internally
it is a dome 80 feet in diameter, supported on a range of columns
disposed ootagonally, and all the details correspond with those of
the best period of decorated architecture." (Fergusson.) This
structure is on the spot where originally stood a small wooden
chapel, erected by King Magnus the Good, (1035 to 1047) only,
but illegitimate, son of ''Saint Olaf," over his father's grave. Of
that sainted monster, who was doubtless mainly instrumental in
the nominal conversion to Christianity of the kingdom which he
governed from 1016 to 1080, a lively idea may be formed from
the fascinating pages of Old Snorro Sturleson's " Heimskringla,
or Sagas of the Kings of Norway,** written in the 12th century,
and covering a period of some 800 years. By way of specimen,
I will conclude the present paper with a typical extract from
Saga VIL, chap. 72, Laing's Translation. The king during his
progress in the Uplands '' enquired particularly how it stood with
their Christianity, and, where improvement was needful, he
taught them the right custom. If any there were who would
not renounce heathen ways, he took the matter so zealously, that
he drove some out of the country, mutilated others of hands or
*° See Appendix E. " HUtory of ArchUecture, p. 215.
Ancient Norwegian Wooden Churches. 1 25
feet, or stung (sic) their eyes out; hung up some, cut down
some with the sword, but let none go unpunished who would not
serre God. He went thus through the whole district, sparing
neither great nor small." Thus the mingled heathen and
Christian symbolism of early Norsk ecclesiastical decoration
found a less innocent analogue in matters of faith and practice
under the Draconic rule of Olaf Haraldsson, '' the Saint ! '*
APPENDIX A.
Mr. Dasent in The Story of Bwmt Njal, or Life in Iceland
at the end of the 10th century, says : " Besides their domestic
buildings, the great chiefs who were the first settlers invariably
built another. This was the Hof or Temple for the gods, and
this it is not hard to restore. These buildings consisted of two
parts, a nave and a shrine, which last is expressly compared to
the choir or chancel of Christian churches. It was built round
and arched. In it, in a half circle, stood the images of the gods,
and before them, in the middle of the half circle, was the
altar ('stalli')- On it lay the holy ring ('baugi'), on which
all solemn oaths were sworn ; and there, too, was the blood
bowl ('hlautbolli')> ^ which the blood of the slaughtered
victims was caught, and the blood twig (" hlauttvein ") with which
the worshippers were sprinkled to hallow them in the presence
of the Almighty Gods. On the altar burned the holy fire which
was never suffered to be quenched."
B.
I am indebted to the kindness of our Honorary Secretary for
the following extract from Mr. J. 0. Westwood's essay on Celtic
Ornament, in Owen Jones' Orammar of Ornament. — " That
the Scandinavian artists adopted Celtic ornamentation, especially
such as was practised about the end of the 10th or 11th
centuries, is evident from the similarity of their carved wooden
churches (illustrated in detail by M. Dahl) and the Irish metal
work of the same period, such as the Cross of Cong, in the
museum of the Boyal Irish Academy, Dublin."
C.
Professor E. A. Freeman {History of Architecture, p. 198,)
says : " It is distinctly proved by historical testimonies collected
and sifted with the most extensive and patient learning, that an
126 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
ornamental Bomanesque style existed in Ireland anterior to the
eleventh century, one, moreover, which exhibited many of the
identical decorations which some of our archaeologians would fain
make us believe were hardly known till the 12th. This style,
which seems to have been in use from a period anterior to the
9th down to the 12th century, is by no means identical with our
Norman, although strongly resembling it in character."
D.
My thanks are due to my friend, the Eev. F. E. Warren, B.D.,
Eector of Prenchay, for the following additional particulars of
early wooden churches in Great Britain and Ireland, extracted
from his well-known work on The Liturgy and Ritual of the
Celtic Churchy Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1881.
" Where wood could be obtained it was generally employed, so
much so that the custom of the Irish to use wood obtained for it
in the middle ages the title of * mos Scottorum,' ' opus Scoticum,'
'the Scottish style.'
" The church of St. Derbhfraich, near Clogher, in Tyrone (5th
century), was a wooden structure. So was that of St. Ciaran
of Saighir, in the same century.
** In the 6th century St. Monenna * founded a monastery, which
was made of smooth planks, according to the fashion of the
Scottish nation, who were not accustomed to erect stone walls,
or to get them erected.' St. Columba's church at Derry was
built of timber and watling.
" In the 7th century St. Kevin (Coemgen) built his oratory of
rods of wood ; St. Gobban, a famous builder, constructed a
wooden church for St. Mulling. It is told of St. Mochaoi, abbot
of Nendrum, that on one occasion he went with seven score young
men to cut wattles to make his church.
" In the 9th century the Annals of Ulster record a hurricane
which occurred on the festival of St. Martin, and which pros-
trated a great many trees in the woods, and carried the churches
(Diurtheachs) from their places.
" In the 12th century the custom of building churches of wood
was still continued in Ireland, as appears from St. Bernard's
notice of a church built by Malachy, archbishop of Armagh.^
» << Porro oratorinm intra paucoB dies conaiunmAtain est de lignis qaidem levi-
gatis, sed apte firmiterqae contextam, opns Scoticum palohmm satis.'* — S. Ber-
nard!, VUa 8, Malaehicif c. vi., § 14.
Ancient Norwegian IVooden Churches. 127
" The same custom prevailed in other portions of the Celtic
church. In Scotland, St. Ninian's church amongst the southern
Picts at the end of the 4th, or beginning of the 5th century,
obtained its name of ' Candida Gasa ' from the very unusual
circumstance that it was built of stone, the use of which for
building purposes was not customary at that date.^
'' St. Adamnan implies that the first buildings at lona, includ-
ing the church, were of wood.
" Early in the 8th century, Nectan, king of the Picts, sent
into England for builders in stone, after that Benedict Biscop
had introduced there the Boman custom of emplojdng this more
durable material.
" In the Northumbrian church, Finan, who had been a monk
at lona, and who succeeded Aidan as bishop of Lindisfarne,
A.D. 651, ' built a church fit for an episcopal see, not of stone, but
altogether of sawn wood, covered with reeds, after the Scotic
fashion.'
'' In England, the buildings at Glastonbury, as they existed in
the British church, before the Anglo-Saxon refoundation of that
monastery m the 7th century, were, according to tradition, of
wood.
'* In Wales, when St. Kentigem founded his monastery of St.
Asaph, in the 6th century, he built the church of dressed wood,
* after the manner of the Britons, since they were not yet either
accustomed or able to build with stone.' St. Gwynllyw, at the
close of the same century, is recorded to have built a cemetery
chapel of wood.^
'' On the continent, when the great Celtic missionary St. Col-
umbanus received from the King of the Lombards a site for his
church and monastery at Bobbio, a.d. 615, he was said to have
been supematurally assisted in procuring the wood for that
purpose.
'' It must not be inferred that the use of wooden buildings was
confined to the Celtic race. Such work was known in France as
'opus Gallicum,' in contradistinction to stone work, 'opus
Bomanense.' It is described in Itolia Montimenta Historim
"3 « Eo qaod ibi ecclesiam de lapide, insolito Brittonibua more fecerit." — Bede,
H. E., III., 4.
^ It is supposed to be the church at Newport, Monmouthshire, situated in the
hundred of Gwentloog, and dedicated to him under the name of St. Wodlos.
128 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
PatruB,* vol. I, Edict. Reg. Langobard. App. XI, p. 246. In
Anglo-Saxon times, King Edwin (616 — 633), built a wooden
church at Tynemouth ; there was a ' monasteriolum ligneum ' in
the same town, rebuilt by St. Oswald in stone. The wooden
cathedral at Ghester-le- Street remained till a.d. 1042. The first
church of St. Peter at York, a.d. 627> was ' de ligno.' There is
a wooden church of the 11th century, at Little Greensted near
Ongar, Essex, now."
E.
St. Edmund, who is said to have been bom at Niirnberg in
841, became king of East Anglia in 855, and, after a crushing
defeat by the Danes at Thetford in 870, was captured by them
in a wood at Eglesdene (now Hoxne), tied to a tree, and slain with
arrows. His body is said to have lain buried there for thirty-
three years in an obscure wooden chapel, and then to have been
removed to Bedrichesworth (St. Edmund's-Bury) where a large
wooden church was constructed for its reception. During the
ravages of the Danes in 1010,^ St. Edmund's bones were re-
moved to London to avoid falling into their hands. There they
remained three years, and, when they were being re-conveyed to
Bury St. Edmund's, they were deposited on their way, in a
" wooden chapel," which there seems good ground for identifying
with the nave of the little church at Greensted, Chipping Ongar,
Essex. '' The building is formed of split trunks of oak trees, the
top part being cut to a thin edge, which was let into a deep groove
in the plate, and pinned. The bottoms of these upright timbers
were morticed into the sill. Their sides were grooved, and
tongues of oak let in between them, so as to make the whole firm
and weather tight. Upon the face of the timber inside the church
were a great number of triangular cuts, having a rough bur on
one side, such as would be produced by the angle of an adze.
These cuts are the key for the plaster with which the interior of
the church was covered. There are twenty-four timbers on the
south side, and twenty-five on the north. The nave is 29 feet,
9 inches long, 14 feet wide, and 5 feet 6 inches high to the top
of the plate. The west end, part of which remains, was carried
*5 *<And the Danes held sway over the East Angles, and for three months
harried and burned, ay, even into the wild fens they went, and there slew men
and cattle, and bnmed throughout the fens; and Thetford they burned, and
Cambridge." — Aiiglo-Saxon Chronicle, Thorpe's translation, M.X., p. 116.
Ancient Norwegian JVooden Churches. 129
ap in the middle as high as the ridge of the roof, and consisted
of two layers of planks fastened together with tree-nails. It is
probable that the outside of the church was covered with plaster,
or rough-cast. The external covering would carry us through a
portion of the long period of existence of this church, and it
must be remembered that its mode of construction completely
prevented any repair by replacing one of the timbers. Every
part is of the same age. To replace a side timber the roof plate
must have been lifted ; each tree being framed into the sill as
well as into the plate. This is the strongest proof of its great
antiquity, for it is not likely that any rebuilding would have been
executed, after the 11th or 12th centuries, with such materials in
the manner found here.*' In 1848, the bottoms of the timbers
having become unsound, they were taken down, the decayed and
worm-eaten ends cut oflf, and then the whole carefully replaced.
These extracts are from a little illustrated book by the Rev. P.
W. Eay, Rector of Greensted, entitled The History of Oreensted
Church near Ongar, Essex. — Slocombe, Chipping Ongar, 1869.
F.
In connection with the subject of wooden churches, I may,
perhaps, be allowed to call attention to one erected in a region
abounding in forests of enormous extent, and furnishing timber
of gigantic size. Douglas Pines, 200 to 250 feet in height and
6 to 10 feet in diameter, and "cedars" of scarcely inferior pro-
portions, are abundant throughout thousands of square miles of
forest in Washington Territory, U.S.A., and at the " town " of Old
Tacoma there is a curious illustration of the connection between
structure and material. The church, a small, bam-Uke
erection, appears from a little distance to have gone into
strange partnership with an Irish round tower or Ravenna cam-
panile, standing, like them, detached from the building, but, on
a nearer approach, it is seen that the practical and economical
architect has merely cut down a fine old pine, some 6 or 7 feet
thick, to within about 40 feet of the ground, and crowned the
stump with a sort of pepper-castor structure, in which the bell is
suspended. The inhabitants boast that theirs is "the oldest
church tower on the American continent,'' and, as the age of the
tree is probably upwards of 400 years, the claim is not altogether
unfounded.
130 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
lietent €^ta\)attong at ^tltiurp J^tU
By ALFRED 0. PASS.
{Read December 15M, 1886.)
SiLBURY Hill is said to be the greatest artificial mound in Europe ;
it is 125 feet high, and covers about five acres of ground ; the
summit is flat and is 108 feet diameter.
Various conjectures have been formed as to its original pur-
pose ; one of these is, that it was a sepulchral monument, and
another, that it was erected for religious worship in connection
with the so-called Druidic temple at Avebury, which is exactly
one mile distant from it.
The question of the date of its erection has also been much
discussed.
In the belief that this great mound had been raised as a
tumulus, it has on two occasions been opened. In the year 1777,
the Duke of Northumberland, and Colonel Drax, brought miners
from Cornwall, and sunk a shaft from the summit to the base of
the hill. In 1849, the Archaeological Institute caused a tunnel to
be made from the south side to the centre of the hill, when the
original nucleus or starting-point was found, consisting of con-
centric layers of material. In neither of these examinations was
any trace of sepulture discovered, but merely a few fragments of
stags' horns, probably the tools used by the builders when exca-
vating the chalk rock, of which this mound is chiefly composed.
From these two examinations it may reasonably be inferred
that the mound is not sepulchral ; for if so, we should naturally
expect to find, in the primary centre of the hill, the body of the
great dead, for whose honour it was raised.
In describing the tunnel of 1849, the Dean of Hereford, in his
Diary of a Dean, says : " Nothing could be more evident than the
existence of the primary heaping of the mound, through the
centre of which, or very nearly so, the elevated tunnel was cut.
Recent Excavations at Silbury Hill. 1 3 1
At the floor of this was traceable the line of the original turf of
the natural hill, and it was clear to demonstration that this had
not been cut through. No cist, therefore, had been found below
that line in any part yet examined. . . . One thing is manifest,
that the examiners of 1777 did not hit the actual centre of the
tumulus, whilst we have excavated its very core."
Now, had this mound been erected as a monument, we should
expect to find it placed on an elevated situation where it could be
seen from afar, but, on the contrary, it is placed on very low
ground, at the very bottom of a gently-rising down ; and this
fact has been referred to by Duke, who, in his Druidic Temples,
says : '* This peculiar spot is a hollow nearly surrounded on all
sides with moderately rising ground ; " and also by the Rev.
A. C. Smith, who, in his Silbury, says : " Standing as it does on
comparatively low ground, and surrounded with undulating
downs, which tower above it, very limited indeed is the view from
the summit."
Had it been raised on the summit of one of these ** undulating
downs " it would have been visible for many miles around. The
barrows in this neighbourhood are placed on the hill tops, and
are remarkably prominent objects in the landscape.
On looking down from the summit of Silbury Hill to the
meadow below, a well-defined line is seen, which plainly marks
out the area whence was obtaiaed the chalk used for making the
hill ; the land within this line is under the level of the adjacent
ground, and in summer the grass grows here of a brighter green,
owing to the greater amount of moisture in the soil.
It will be seen that this boundary line extends in the form of
a circle, nearly surrounding the base of Silbury Hill, at a dis-
tance of 100 feet on the north and east; but to the west it
includes a larger area. On the south is a deep trench separating
the mound from the adjacent high ground, and across this part a
narrow causeway or ridge of chalk rock w^as allowed to remain when
the rest was removed, and this appears to have been the only
approach to the mound. Even between this causeway and the
hill there is still a great gap of some depth. There may possibly
have been two approaches on this side.
A special survey of Silbury Hill has been made for me by
Messrs. Ashmead, and the accompanying plans were prepared by
them. The southern boundary of the meadow is a steep escarp-
132 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
ment formed by the removal of the chalk from the sloping side of
the rising down. Here chalk has been removed to a depth of over
40 feet from the original surface of the down as shown in plan
No. 2.
Having for some time past thought that an excavation in the
meadow at the foot of the mound would disclose the depth from
which the chalk had been removed, and would also throw some
light on the origin of the hill, I apphed to the owner of the
meadow, Mr. Pinniger, and obtained from him leave to sink a
a shaft there. Subsequently, he kindly gave me further per-
mission, so that this autumn I was enabled to have ten shafts
sunk in the meadow, to the west and north of the hill, at the
spots shown on the plan. All these shafts passed first through
about a foot of dark surface soil, and then through white alluvial
clay, until the undisturbed chalk rock was reached ; this solid
chalk being the limit of depth of the excavated material used in
constructing the mound.
In shafts Nos. 1 and 8, marks of the original workers were
visible in the form of notches or steps in the chalk.
The measurements prove that the chalk had been generally
removed to a depth of about 15 feet, but near the foot of the hill
this depth was increased to about 21 feet below the present level
of the meadow, and this has all been replaced by alluvium.
Near the mound, the alluvial clay in the moat contained a
large admixture of chalk rubble which has rolled from the hill ;
but further from the mound, at shaft 6, there was not one frag-
ment of chalk rubble in the entire depth of 15 feet ; but only fine
white tenacious clay, with a few fractured flints and some bones.
A very large part of the chalk used in making Silbury Hill was
obtained from the west side ; here, instead of a trench 100 feet
wide, a large area has been excavated to a depth of over 20 feet
near the hill, and 15 or 16 feet elsewhere.
All the chalk and earth required for making this great mound
was probably carried in baskets on the heads of men, women, and
children, from the trench, although it could have been obtained
with far less labour from the high ground to the south, had there
not been some motive which led the builders to take the materials
from near the base of the mound.
It may appear strange that the hill was formed by this method,
but in our own day, vast railway embankments in Europe and
ILiHiY NilJLL
WILTS.
Plan
m
^f>o.
#«
W
£
m'
y' s
O
6
^ e
IS -*--
^ nv
O
7
I -?/^
'^^«*><^ ^^rf^
- NOTE
Shafts stL^^A/ vn/ /^S6
TThOirhtcL (Jizcs X
shewn/ thiis 9
G C Ashmead & Son. Bristol
PkteM.
Scale of Reel-
i
^
WILTS.
p T t s e fv t
Z e V e t
Sect
Fro m WE5
o f
From Nor
V
r ^ «:
I I ^
T X g
t
TV d
f
'esf.nt le\tl of a -round.
1
/
J
NOTE -
GrouncL^ oru>& ea:coiVObte.ff^ , since/
fzlZed. Z71. hy Alluvijof.l. ofeposrt .
shewn/ tJvtts
V «
Scale oF Beet -
too
1^
50 O
lOO
GC Ashmead i Son Bnstol
PkteMl.
ONS
r ho East.
H t-o South
Worked Flmt.N^S Shaft,
Recent Excavations at Silbury Hill. 133
India have been thus made. Sir Thomas Brassey, in his book
Work and Wages, refers to " the Italian villagers, men, women,
and children, carrying earth in baskets on their heads," to
construct railways.
My excavations were commenced in the month of September,
after a long continuance of dry weather, so that the adjacent Uttle
stream, the Kennet, had been dried up for more than two months ;
yet water continually stood to the depth of 8 feet in the deep holes
(21 feet) , sunk at the foot of the mound ; and I think it would
never at any time of the year fall much below that level.
From these results it will be seen that when Silbury Hill was first
formed, it was nearly surrounded by a deep and wide trench or
moat, which at all times contained a considerable depth of water ;
and the large excavated area to the west of the hill, although not
so deep as the trench, must necessarily have been a pond of water
during a great part of every year. This fact has hitherto escaped
observation, but it was from a surmise that this would prove to be
the case, that I was first led to attempt these explorations.
For what purpose was this moat intended? There is one
reason probable, and that is for the purpose of defence. By sur-
rounding the hill with water it could be approached only by the
narrow causeway situate on the south side, and this could have
been stockaded as a further defence.
My conclusions are, that the builders of this mound selected
its pecuUar low situation for the sole purpose of obtaining the line
of defence furnished by the water in the surrounding moat, and
that Silbury Hill was erected as a tribal stronghold or place of
retreat and defence in case of a sudden attack by enemies.
The mound at Marlborough strongly resembles Silbury Hill,
and was erected in a similar low situation near the same stream,
the Kennet, possibly for the same purpose and by the same race
of men.
In the course of these explorations an interesting discovery was
made which throws light on the date of the erection of the mound.
In shaft No. 5,^ after passing through 9 feet of white alluvial
clay, the men came to a distinct blackish layer about a foot in
thickness, consisting of the usual tenacious clay, with a large
admixture of charcoal, fractured flints, bones, and small burnt
Sarsen stones, all evident indications of human occupation. I
' See Plan.
4
134 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
had the whole of this layer carefully set aside, and washed it in
water through a sieve, so as to separate all the clay ; and then
examined the residue for traces of human workmanship. Besides
other flints, one well- worked ^ini implement^ rewarded this search.
In another shaft also (No. 6), flint flakes were found in the allu-
vium. These flints I sent to the highest authority upon flint
implements, Mr. John Evans, D.C.L., P.S.A., who kindly ex-
amined them, and wrote as follows : ** The flints from No. 5 shaft
are, I think, aU artiftcial. One, which is very well wrought, may
be either an unfinished arrow-head as you suggest, or a small
knife such as is sometimes found in the interments in barrows.
The flakes are probably the waste pieces from chipping out some
large tools, though some of them have been used as instruments
for cutti7ig and scraping. The evidence you have obtained shows
that flint has been in use since Silbury Hill was formed, for
cutting instruments, for I think that the knife or arrow-head from
shaft 5 must be accepted as probably not later than the Bronze
period, to which most of our flint arrow-heads belong ; and fur-
ther, I think that any doubt that may have existed as to the
mound being pre-Boman may now be dispelled."
These finds reveal the important fact that, long after Silbury
Hill had been erected, the neighbourhood was inhabited or visited
by a people who made and used flint weapons. The time was so
long after the formation of the mound that not less than 5 feet of
alluvium had accumulated in that part of the trench which these
flint-workers occupied when they temporarily encamped there,
lighted their fires, cooked their food, and formed their flint
weapons.
The time of their stay must have been either summer or
autumn, for in the spring and winter months the level of their
encampment, which is 9 feet under the present surface, would be
always under water, because it is much below the level of the
adjacent stream which forms the only drainage for this district.
In the winter of every year this meadow is now frequently sub-
merged by the overflow of the stream.
Besides their weapons, these flint men left behind some remains
of the animals which supplied them with food; and Professor
Lloyd Morgan has identified the bones of deer, ox, and pig ; also
of man's faithful companion, the dog. More remarkable still,
"PUte XVI
Recent Excavations at Silbury Hill. 135
there was found in this black layer, a human bone, broken into
two pieces. It is a femur, possessing peculiar characteristics of
some interest, from the fact of the linea aspera being developed
to a very unusual extent.
I wish to call attention to the lower jaws and to the fragments of
bones from this black layer. These fragments are just such small
hard pieces as we now see left uneaten by dogs, and these are
evidently the dogs' leavings. Sir John Lubbock, in his account
of the Danish Kitchen Middens describes a similar fact ; and he
alludes to the frequent occurrence of the lower jaws of animals
which the dogs had left there uneaten.
We may infer that some of the food was cooked by boiling,
for the small Sarsen stones found associated with the other re-
mains, have all been burnt, and probably have been used as pot-
boilers.
It does not follow that the builders of Silbury Hill were actually
the same race as the flint workers, whose traces were found in
the trench. A long interval of time must have necessarily
elapsed to account for the deposit of 5 feet of alluvium ; so these
men may have supplanted some previous race of dwellers, but if
so, it simply carries back the date of the erection of Silbury Hill
to a still more remote period.
In every shaft but one many bones of animals were found in
the alluvium at all depths. Professor Lloyd Morgan has kindly
examined these, and finds they belong exclusively to ox and deer.
It is remarkable that not any bones of sheep were found in these
excavations, although that animal has for many centuries been
most abundant in Wiltshire.
In addition to the objects already referred to, a brass coin of
Marcus Aurelius was found 6 feet under the surface in shaft No.
2 ; and in another shaft, an iron arrow point was found ; these
things however, bear but Uttle on the date of the mound.
As the outcome of these excavations, I have ascertained that
Silbury Hill was originally surrounded by a deep trench or moat.
Also, that it was erected by a people, probably a rude race of
hunters, so little advanced in civilisation that they were using flint
implements a long time after the hill was built. This discovery
places the date of the erection of Silbury Hill at a very early
period, possibly many centuries before the arrival of the Eomans
in Britain.
136 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
^ncunt Bristol Botumeitts.
No. II.
SI nu*totts( Beeli belongfuig to ti)e ^arfel^ of M^
By LiBUT.-CoL. J. IL BRAMBLE, Tbiasurbr.
{Read November 12M, 1885.)
The Parish of St. Mary-le-Port, otherwise St. Mary de Foro, or,
St. Mary of the Market, from the Cattle Market having formerly
been held in the street, is one of the smallest in Bristol. The
church consists of nave with north aisle ; a chancel in prolong-
ation of the north side of the nave; western tower, and
modem vestry of two stories erected in the angle between the
chancel and aisle, on the site of the former Eectory house.
It is a fair specimen of a small 15th century city church, and
has a peculiar quaintness owing to the row of tall 17th century
gabled houses which have been erected against, and partly over,
the north aisle and porch, filling up the narrow space between
the aisle and the street. But perhaps the fine collection of
Deeds relating to the parish property, and the books, accounts,
and other papers which have been carefully preserved for a very
long series of years, form the most interesting study in connec-
tion with the church. One of the Deeds is of as early a date
as c. 1280, and in many cases the armorial bearings and Mer-
chants* marks on the seals are still very perfect.
The following Deed tells a tale much more sensational than is
often found in the musty contents of a church chest, and
hardly requires the talent of Mr. Joseph Leech to form the foun-
dation of a local romance of considerable interest.
The names of many of the persons named as being present at
the church on the occasion to which the Deed refers are to be
Ancient Bristol Documents. 137
found in Ricart^s Calendar, or in The Great Orphan Book, the
former of which has been pubUshed by the Camden Society, and
the latter by the Bristol and Gloucestershire Archaeological
Society.
The " pewe (pair) of indentures *' bond for £20, &c., are still
among the Church Eecords, the seals with the Baynard Arms
being very beautiful. The shield is hanging by the sinister chief
from the helmet on which is the crest a demi Unicom proper.
The arms are quartered, and in each case the bearing in the first
and fourth is a double-headed eagle displayed. Those in the second
and third are a fesse between two chevrons. The latter are
given by Edmondson, as Baynard of Blagdon, Com. Somerset. In
the Deeds the vendor is described as of Lackam, Com. Wilts.
I cannot find that the eagle was ever used by any branch of the
Baynard family, and no doubt the engraver omitted to transpose
the arms on the seal, the bearings thus appearing reversed in the
wax. In the margin, in Old English caps, " S. PhiUp Baynard.'*
The property enfeoffed is not now to be found amongst the
Church lands. It no doubt formed part of
*' Certyne lande given for the kepinge of dyvce obitte and the
"mayntenance of lampez and hghte in the seid Churche for
" ev." (Chantry Certificates, Gloucestershire, RoU22, B. dk (?. Arch.
Socy's. Proceedings, Vol. VIII. p. 250), and was duly confiscated
by that most religious king, Henry VIII; but as to this the
local records are silent.
Co fill ttllt cristen people of whate estate degre or condicion
they be to whome this present writing shall come John Edwardes
Rauf ap Eys Bichard Abyngdon late Shirifs of the Towne of
Bristowe John Grene Thomas Barbor Thomas Cachemay Edmund
Segeford David Willys John Bale John Peasly Rowland Cowper
Clement Haywardyn Grifl&th Davy and John Seycell Burgeises
of the same Towne of Bristowe men of gode evedens and sadnes
send gretyng Knowe ye that we the forsaid John Edwardes
Richard Abyngdon John Grene Thomas Cachemay and others
seriatly abovenamed were psonally psent wn the Pish Church of
Seynt Mary Port of Bristowe forsaid the xxiith day of Juyn in the
yere of o*" lord god m c.c.c.c.c.viij wh Richard Boys pson of the
same Church and many others where and when John Newman
138 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
theldre then of Bristowe forsaid Bochoi' of his gode mynd which
he then heve unto the welth of his Sowle said openly these
wordes or nygh like unto the same. iSlStdttrfiC ye knowe right
well that I being a pore man toke to wyf Johan Luke nowe my
wyf late the wyf of Thomas Luke Bochor which Johan brought
to me an hundred pound and more in money and plate. So it is
nowe that I and she ben condescended to do for o>^ sowles and for
the sowle of the said Thomas Luke w part of the said money
Wherf ore I w* thassent of the same Johan my Wyf have purchased
of Mast Philip Baynard a messuage win the Towne of Bristowe
abovesaid sett win the Shamels ^ of the same towne to me and
myn heirs forev' for which I paid to the same Maist Baynard in
hand Twenty Pound of the money which I had of the said
Johan my Wyf and Twenty Pound more must be paid to hym at
certeyn daies heraft as ben betwene hym and me by a pewe * of
Indentures agreed 3nil fUrt()(rtnort yowe knowe right well
that Maist Edwardes Maist Bauf ap Bys John Grene and Thomas
Barbo^ have recowd the same messuage ageyn me before the
Kynges Justice' of his owen Bench $t Westm to theym and their
heirs Wherefor I woU nowe that my Eecorders enter now the said
messuage beforce of the said Becorde And aft that doon I will
that they and their heirs stand and be seased of and in the forsaid
messuage w^ his apptences ^ to thuse of me of the said Johan my
' " ShameU " or Shambles, otherwise Worshipful Street. The houses known
by this name were between the Church-yard of St. Mary-le-Port and the River
Avon, occupying the northern portion of the site on which Bridge Street was
erected about 1760. It appears from the conveyance that the premises in ques-
tion abutted on the Churchyard.
* *' A pewe of Indentures." Deeds were of two kinds. A deed yoQ, and an
IwUniuTt, The former was polled or cut straight at the upper margin, and was
applicable to such deeds as the present— not made between parties, but all being
interested in the same manner. Where however there were two parties in
different interests — a vendor and a purchaser, the Deed was supposed to be made
and executed in duplicate on the same piece of parchment, which was afterwards
cut into two parts in an indented line, and each party took one portion — hence
the term " a pair of indentures.*' The distiuution is still observed although. the
reason has long since ceased.
3 ** Reoowd the same messuage ageyn me before the Kynges Justice,'' &c. This
refers to the ancient form of conveyance by *' suffering a recovery." It was in
effect a mock action brought by the purchaser against the vendor, in which, by
consent, judgment was given for the purchaser.
^ John Newman retains the property for himself and wife for their lives. His
charity is to take effect when the property can be of no further use to him.
Happily we now live in better times, and never hear of such selfish proceedings.
Ancient Bristol Documents. 139
Wyf for tme of o^ lyves And aft o^^ decease I woU that the rent
issues and pfits comyng of the said messuage be disposed and
comited by my said Eecorders and their heirs forev^ in this wise
that is to say for an Obite yerely to be holden foreV win the said
Pish Church for the Sowles of me and the said Johan my Wyf
and of Thomas Luke by the yere by my said Eecorders and
and theire heirs to be assigned paying for the same obite iij s iiijd
also for the fyndyng of a lampe before the blissed Sacrament of
the High Aulter of the same Churche forev^ viijs And I woU that
all the Besidue of the said Bent issues and prfits comyng of the
same messuage be comited and emploied by my said Becorders
and theire heirs forevi* towardes the helpyng sustinince and
fyndyng of an honest prist to syng for the sowles of me and of
the said Johan my Wif and Thomas Luke win the Chappell of
mayden Uncombre otherwise called Seynt Wilgefort^ lately
builded within the said Pissh Church amonge other gode doers
there forev^ 3nl) immediately aft these wordes by the forsaid
John Newman in man and fome abovespecified spoken and deliv-
ered we the forsaid Becorders by vertue of the said recorde and
wyll abovedeclared entered into the said messuage in the prsence
of the same John Newman and of divers other prsons and owte
s " Mayden Uncombre, otherwise Seynt Wilgefort." I have been favoured
with the foUowing valuable note by our president, Bishop Clifford : *' The name
of Saint Wilgefort, or Mayden Uncombre, appears in the Eoman Martyrology as
a Virgin and Martyr on July 20th. She was honoured in Belgium, Holland,
Germany, Normandy, and £ngland, under the name of Wilgefort or Oncommer
(Outcommene, Outcommer, Ohukummerus) in the 15th and 16th centuries. Her
name occurs in the Salisbury OrdOj printed at Paris 1533, in the litany of the
Saints ; and the same Ordo contains an Antiphon and Prayer in her honour. She
was also (after 1590) called " Liberata," and was confused with a Saint of that
name honoured in Spain, Portugal, Italy, and other parts of France, besides
Normandy ; but this was an error. She was said to have been martyred in
Portugal, but the legends about her are late and spurious. This I gather from
the Bollandists. There also I find that the German name Ohnkummer is composed
of the preposition Ohn without, and the substantive kumTner, which signifies
sadness or anxiety ; so that the meaning is, the Maiden without sorrow or anxiety.
The Belgian name, Oncommer, has the same meaning.
'* The name Wilgefort is certainly not Portuguese, and the legend about her
Portuguese origin is spurious. The name is evidently of Geiman or Belgian origin.
It is conjectured (with probability) that the name originally was Virgo^Fortis —
(for in her life, written in French, she is called vierge forte) — and this was popu-
larly corrupted into Vilge-fortis. Her popularity in the 16th century accounts
for a chapel having been erected in her honour in St. Mary-le-Port at Bristol."
I may add to these particulars that I have not met with any similar dedication
in England.
140 Clifton Aniiquarian Club.
of the said messuage we brought a possenett of bras^ in the name
of possession and season of the forsaid messuage And immediately
thereupon the said John Newman and we the fomamed John
Edwardes Bauf ap Bys John Grene Thomas Barbo' and others
abovenamed came unto the Taveme called the Bores hed^ of
Bristowe forsaid and then and there the same John Newman
eftsones rehersed his wyll and intent above declared And then and
there he afi&rmed the same and moreov desired us the said
Becorders w* his cappe in his hand that we the same Becorders
and 0' heirs wold stand and be seased to thuse abovewritten, and
that we wold pfome and fulfill his said will abovedeclared which
to be don and pfomed we the same Becorders for us and o^* heirs
then and there quieted unto hym And thereupon the said John
Newman paid for us all at the same Taveme for such wyne as we
there drank 13ntl aftward the xxxjth day of August in the yere
abovewritten the same John Newman was felonously murdred at
Bristowe forsaid by Denys Grene then svint of the said John
Newman and there the same day dyed 4^Urtf)(rtnOrt we the
forsaid John Edwardes Bauf ap Bys John Grene Thomas Barbo>'
and others abovenamed certify that the forsaid Johan Newman
now widowe and executrice of the testament of the same John
Newman trustyng verely the forsaid will of the same John
Newman late hir husband by hym in man and forme abovewritten
declared to be gode and effectuall in consciens and in lawe paid
unto the fomamed Philip Baynard aft the deth of the forsaid John
Newman the forsaid Twenty pound as it appereth by wrytyng
sufficient in the lawe under the seale of the same Philip. Which
the same Philip will be redy at all tymys to confesse and endlache
in any Court Spi all or temporall 9[iS(0 we the forsaid Becorders
certefy that we be seased of and in the fomamed messuage to
thuse of the forsaid Johan (by reason of the Survivo^) for tme of
hir lif and aft hir decesse to the further use and pfomance of the
^"Brought a possenett of bras in the name of possession." Possenett, or
Posnet, '* a lyttel potte " PaUgrave or ** small iron pot with a handle on the side/'
Orose, In the Craven dialect " a boiler." Promp. Parv. (Camden Socy.) p. 410,
note. This refers to taking actual corporeal possession by " livery of seisin.
7 « The Bore's hed.'' I do not find the name of this tavern elsewhere, and can-
not say where it stood. Entries repeatedly occur in the accounts of money spent
at the Raven, the Swan, the Star, the Lamb, 'the King's Head, and other Tav-
erns, but the Boar's Head is not mentioned ; neither does the name occur in any of
the published Histories of Bristol, or in Mr. NichoUs' paper on '* The Old Hoitel-
ries of Bristol. Bristol and Olouceatershire Arch, 8oey. *8 Proceedings, VoL VIL
Ancient Bristol Documents. 141
will and intent of the abovesaid John Newman by hym above-
declared and by us the said Becorders and o^* heirs to be doun
forev^^ iHortObtt^ we the same Becorders testifie that we
oftentyms herd the fomamed John Newman say that Willyam
Newman his Son shuld neV^ have oon peny of hym nother the
value therof in land or godes forasmoche as the same WilUam
was unthrifty and wold not be ruled by his said Fader but folowed
the company of Strong Thevys in the lif of his said Fader by force
wherof his said Son WilUam was arrested for Felony and comytted
to the Kyngs Gaole of Newgate in Brystowe and there remayned
by the space of half an yere and more for suspecione of Felony
Fro which Gaole his forsaid Fadre delyverd hym w* his greate
coste and charge And furthermore we certefy that to ^ knolache
the fomamed WiUiam Newman aft that he was delyverd fro the
Kyngs Gaole of Newgate forsaid untill aft the deth of his said
Fadre came nev^ to Bristowe nother in the sight of his said Fadre
311 kDi)il|) prtntfiigt} and evy of theym we the fomamed Be-
corders and others abovenamed certefy unto you for trouth and
ben redy for to swere upon the Holy Evangelists of god that the
same prmpses conteyn verey trouth and soe ben the voice and
fame witn the said Towne of Bristowe and Suburbes of the same
{n lDitlUfi(fi(t wherof we the said Becorders and others above-
named to this psent writyng have putt o^ Seals (Sobtttg the
xviijth day of January in the ixth yere of the reign of o>^ most
drad souaygn Lord Kyng Henry the VHI.®
(At the foot are seven slips of parchment, to each of which is
attached two seals of small size with the name of the owner
neatly written in a small hand above each. Edwardes' seal
(broken) has a portion of an escutcheon with the letters \ Barbor's,
an eagle (single-headed), displayed (not in an escutcheon) :
Wyllys, a Chevron between three Griffins (?) heads erased. All
the others merchants' marks or initials).
" The murdered man probably died without having made any written wiU ; and
it was necesaary to have evidence of intentions expressed by word of mouth
which was formerly sufficient in law.
9 9th year of Henry VIII., 1517.
142 Clifton Antiquarian Chtb.
No. m.
jTrom tbe Berortifi( of »U ^i(l)Olafl( Cfturcft.
Bv^ Lieut. -Col. BRAMBLE, Treasurer.
(Jitad January 26M, 1886.)
The Parish Church of St. Nicholas, Bristol, stands close to
Bristol Bridge, immediately at the entrance of the old city, over
the south gate of which the chancel stood, until church and
bridge were both rebuilt in the year 1762. The crypt of the old
chancel still exists under High Street, east of the present building.
A church appears to have been erected on this site in very
early, probably in Saxon times, but the earliest portion of the
existing building, the crypt, with small exceptions which may
be early English, dates from about 1500. This crypt consists of
two vaulted aisles of about equal dimensions, and is entered on a
level from the roadway, dividing it from the river Avon. The
existing doorway is modern, the original entrance was near the
east end of the south wall, which at this point is now some 12
feet in thickness. In the records the crypt is known as " the
Crowde," while the building over it is described as " the upper
Church," or " the Church above." '* The crowde " had its own
sets of vestments and books appropriated to it, as appears in the
lengthy schedules still extant.
Among the records of the Parish is a manuscript book of
vellum, 12 inches by 8 inches and \\ inches thick, exclusive of
covers. It is bound in oak, covered with pigskin, and was
formerly secured by two clasps. This book contains copies of
ancient charters and feoffments, inventories of plate, vestments,
books, and other matters, many of somewhat more than local
archflBological and historical value. The earliest entry, a short
inventory of plate, basins and books, is dated 9 Eich. II. (1385,
the date of Wycliffe's death). After this follow four blank pages
and then two pages containing a much longer inventory, dated,
18 Eich. II. (1394). The following extract of an entry, bearing
the date of 1481, relating to the duties of the minor church
officials is, from its allusions to the ceremonies and customs of
the period, of considerable interest.
Ancient Bristol Documents. 143
^otoe tl^e Clerfte an2i tbe ^uffrigan of ^rpnt
^ttib0las( CftUrCft OUgftt to llO in the seyde church after
the use laudable of yeris paste & the agrement nowe of all the
worshipfuU of the Paryshe the yere of owre lord mcccclxxxi. The
SuflErygan^ owgh to fasten the Churche dorys wt a dewe serche in
the sayde Church for fere of slepers.^
And at a dewe season in the mornynge to set opyn the dores
and the entre close dore undyr payne of suche damage as shall
be leveyde of his fautes.
The sayde Suffrygan to se oyle in the ij lampes And also
that they be brennynge and cleane water in the holy water
stokkes under the payne of ij^ as ofte as he is founde fauty in
any of this.
The sayde SuflBrygan to rynge the ffurste pele to mateyns ^ of
convenient lenght <fc to Evensonges. The clerke the seconde
pele and bothe at the ryngyng of the laste pele with ij bellys ye
payne of the firsten ijd the seconde iijd and at the thyde whoo
yt fayles iiijd.
The Satyrday * the Clerke and the Suffrygan to ring none wt
ij belles a pele of leyneth convenient w* owte any fyale excepte
dowbyll ffests ^ under payne of iiijd to eche that fayles in this
same.
' "Suffrigan,** A deputy or assistant.
° **Fere o/depera," These words are written over an erasure.
3 '* Mateyns," There were seven canonical hours in the middle and later ages,
^hich were thus distinguished : (1) Prime about 6 a.m. (2) Tierce about 9 a.m. (3)
Sert about 12 at noon. (4) Nones about 2 or .3. (5) Vespers about 4 or later.
(6) Compline about 7 ; and (7) Matins & Lauds at midnight. — Calendars of the
Middle Ages. Vol. II., 201.
On Festivals, Mass was, in England, said affcer Tierce ; on common days at
Sexts ; in Lent or on Fasts at Nones.— iValcot^s Sacred Archcsology, p. 368.
* ** The Satyrday,'* Ac, As early as Anglo-Saxon times the hallowing of the
Sunday began with Saturday afternoon's service. — Rock's Church q/' our
Fathers, vol. IV., p. 16, quoting Leges Regis JSadgari, "And let Sunday's
Festival be held from the noon of Saturday until the dawn of Monday."
5 ** Double Feasts," Certain Feasts on which there are two offices, or the
proper office is repeated. In the Saram Use they were Christmas day and four
f oUowing days ; Circumcision ; Epiphany ; Purification ; Annunciation ; Easter
and three following days; Invention of the Cross; Ascension; Pentecost and
three foUowing days ; Trinity ; S. John Baptist ; SS. Peter and Paul ; Assump-
tion and Nativity B, V. M. ; ** Festum Reliquarium ;" S. Michael; All Saints;
Saints ; and S. Andrew. In double feasts the choir was '* ruled '* by four clerks
of whom two were principals.
144 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
The sayde suffrygan evry Satorday to spryng the churche wt
water for resyng of dowste & to streke hit undyr payne of vijd
tociens quociens as he fayles.
The sayde suflErygan to par® the crowde^ the steyrs & the
churche dores & so to be had a weye as ofte as nedyth payne of
iiijd tociens quotiens.
The Gierke and the Su&ygan bothe to laye farthe the Bokes
in the quere at the seconde pele both afore mateyns & also afore
evensonges and the servyce so ended and don to sette the sayde
Bokes elapsed and securely in ther place payne of ijd to eche that
fayles tociens quociens.
The Gierke and the Su&ygan to see in principall festis ^ that
the Gopys to be borne at the sensyng auters be redy upon the
auters by for the begynnyng of Evensonges and in lyke wyse at
matenyns and second E vynsonge ® and they bothe to se the foldyng
upp undyr payne of iiijd tociens.
The Gierke and the Suflfrygan to see in principall fests the
auters dressyd in the Ghurche above ^^ at ther charge and to see
coppewests ^^ avoyded and duste fro auters and ymagery undur
payne of iijd toe. quociens.
The su&ygan to go w* the curate and to wayte opon his
koope ^^ and sensor at all his sensynge undyr payne of id toe. qu.
The Gierke and the suffrygan to swepe the glasyn wyndowys
churche wallys and pillars evry quarts ooncys" undyr payne
of iiij to eche of them as ofte as they fayle.
The suffrygan to rynge curfew ^* w* on Bell at ix of the clokke
* ** Par,^^ Prepare or keep in order.
7 " Cratw2e." The crypt or lower Church. 8tit introductory note.
" Principal f easts. In the Trentale, St. Gregory, the principal feasts are ten :
Christmas, the Epiphany, Candlemas, the Annunciation, Easter, Ascension Day
Whit Sunday, Trinity Sunday, the Assumption, and Nativity of the Blesse
Virgin.
9 ** Second Evensong." CompHne. ^^ Church above." iS^ introductory note.
" " Coppewests. Cobwebs. " " Koope.*' Cope. '3 «• Ooncys." Once.
^* Curfew, The curfew was probably from its first institution rung at St.
Nicholas for the City generally. "Item. The Maire and the Shiref chargen and
commanden on the Kyng our Souerain lordis behalf that no manner of personne
of what degree or condioion that they be of at no tyme this Christmas goo a
mommyng with cloce visaged nor go after curfew rong at St. Nicholas withowte
lighte in theire handes that is to say skonce light lantern light candel light or
torche light." — RicarVs Calendar ^ temp. Edward IV., Camden Society, p. 85.
The curfew is stiU rung at 9 p.m. When the writer was churchwarden, a few
years since, the sexton, thinking to escape trouble, stopped the curfew for several
Ancient Bristol Docttments. 145
a convenyent pele the mowtnance of halfe a qrte of an owre large
under payne of ijd.
The Gierke and the SuflErygan to dresse uppe the Byshopes
Gete ^** a genste Seynte Nicholas daye undyr payne of iijd a pece.
The Gierke and the Sufifrygan to dresse upp the Sepulcur^*
taking for a Sop(per) vid.
The Gierke and the Suffrygan to se the lyght on Ester Evyn
a boute the Sepulchur^® takyng for ther dyn(ner) iiijd.
The SufErygan to se dayle for the hight awt when matens ys
don that there be redy a genste the hight masse wyne & water &
to set on the awt bothe Boke and chalice the payne of ijd toe. qu.
The Gierke and the Sufifrygan in their surples to resseve of
the Vicar y chisiple " and other of his omamentys and they to
days, intending to quietly drop it ftltogethor. It will probably be a long time
before a similar attempt is made.
'5 " Bt9ihop*9 Oete.** This refers to the ceremonial of the "Boy Bishop" who
with his officials were known as a "Nicholas and his clerkes." In Bristol, this
occasion appears to have been a civic festival, as is seen by the subjoined extracts
from Ricar^B Calendar. For full particulars of this festival, see Rock^a Church of
our Father8, vol. iv. 215. Also Oentleman'a Mag,, 1821, part 11. , pp. 198-200.
** Item on Seynt Nicholas Eve yn semblable wyse the Maire and Shiref and their
Brethren to walke to Seynt Nicholas Church there to hire theire evensong,
and on the morowe to hire theire masse and offre and hire the bishop's
sermon and have his blissyng; and after dyner the said Maire, Shiref and
theire brethren to assemble at the mairez counter* there waytyng the
Bishoppes comming pleying the meane whiles at Dyce, the towne clerke
t3 fynde theym Dyce and to have Id of evry Raphill [raffle] and when the
Bishope is come thedir his chappell there to synge and the bishope to give them
his blissyng and then he and all his chappell to be served there with brede and
wyne. And so departe the Maire, Shiref and their brethren to hire the bishope's
evesongge at Seynt Nicholas Chirch forseid* — RicarVa Calendar (Camden So-
ciety), p. 80.
x6 (< j^^er Sepulchre,*^ in which the Blessed Sacrament and Crucifix were
deposited from Good Friday till Easter. It was usually a temporary but some- j
times a permanent erection, and stood at or near the north side of the chancel.
In Mr. John Taylor's Book about Bristol will be found a curious detailed i
description of the Easter sepulchre and its appurtenances, presented by '* Master !
Canynges " to Redcliffe Church in 1470— eleven years before the date of this
record, and other particulars relating to the one at All Saints.
'7 *< Chisiple," Chasuble— the distinctive Eucharist ic Vestment of a Priest.
'^ The ToUiil or ToUe!f otherwiae the Ciountar or Comptoir, was where the Mayor held his
Comt. It does not appear elear when the original was erected or where it stood. In 1682,
extenrive " drapery worke, in tpnbre and the paynted or steyned clothes " was paid for, and in
1660 a new "ToUll" was boat, bat whether on the site of the old one is not stated. The new
Tolsill was a oovered walk against All Saints Chorch, bnt was palled down after the new
Exchange was opened in 1748. Foor brazen pillan or tables which formerly stood in the Tolxey
are now erected in front of the Exchange.
146 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
fold hit when mas ys don the workyndayes the payne of a \^
tociens.
The Gierke to ordeyne the Sonday & ffests the Belles at the
hyghe mass Sacrynge ^ to be ronge solempnely and evy
fiferyall^® day to knoll to Sacrynge the pajoie of iiijd tociens
quociens.
The Suflfrygan to be charged wt rynging for dundour ^^ under
payne of vid tociens quotiens also uppon the same payne to ryng
to owre lady masse ^ in lente season a computante pele.
The Gierke to ordeyn Sprynges ^ for the churche and for hym
that visiteth the Sondayes and dewly to here his holy water ^ to
evy howse abydyng soo convenient a space that e^T^ man may
receyve hys holy water payne of iiijd toe. qu.
And the Suffrygan to weyte uppon the preeste in visitaton of
'B ** Sacrynge," The Sacring Bell is rung at the elevation of the Host, and at
other points of special solemnity in the Mass.
*' And when thou hearest the belles rynge
To that holy sakerynge
Knele ye most bothe y-ynge & olde
And bothe yer hondes fayr upholde
And saye thenne, yn thys manere etc.
ConstUtUiones Artis Oeometrie HcdliweWs Hist, of Freemasonry, pp. 32, 33.
»9 ** Ferial Day." ** Day unoccupied by the service of any solemnity, or for a
"Saint.** — RocVs Church of our Fathers, vol. i. p. 9.
^ " Dundour." Thunder. Bells were rung, — ^to still stonns ; such bells bear-
ing the legend, Maria gratioi plena, or Verbum caro factum est, — WaicoiVs Sacred
Arch,, 67. (The custom is still observed in the Tyrol and other parts of
Europe. — Ed.)
>' '* Lady Masse." There was a daily Lady Mass in cathedrals, minsters and
most large churches. It was usually the Eame as the '* Matin Mass " or first mass
of the day, and was sung at earliest dawn with all ritual solemnity. — Rock,
III., 259.
" ^^ Sprynges," Small brushes made of hyssop, with which th Holy Water
was sprinkled.
33 «Bere Ms holy water." It was one of the customary duties of a parish
clerk to carry holy water at certain seasons to all parishioners, from which duty
he derived the name of "aqua bajulus," by which he is often distinguished in
ancient records. In the " Great Orphan Book," at the Bristol Council House, will
be found an entry of the will of Felicia Holleway, of the parish of St. Mary-le-
Port, who gives *' to the Water Bearer " xijd. In 1416, Thomas Curtas was pre-
sented, because he hindered the parish clerk of St. Mary, Bishophill, York, from
entering his house on the Lord's days with holy water, as was the custom of the
city. — York Fabric Rolls, p. 248. In 1543, the Vicar of Kelvedon, Essex, com-
plains *' that there is not caryed holy water nor ryngyng to evensonge accordyng
as the derke shuld do with other duties to him belongyng. — Ardid, Hale*s
Precedents in Criminal Causes,
Ancient Bristol Documents. 147
seke ^ beryng wt. hym the surples, boke, oile, fate and stole.
And in daye tyme in the Suflfrygans absence abowte such
sayde occupacions the Gierke to se for the save garde of the
churche.
The Gierke to synge in redynge the Epistele dayly undyr
payne of ijd and uppon the same payne to ring ye complene pele^^
in lente season.
The SufiErygan to sette fire or do to be sette for the sensres in
the fire place, and not in the sensours undyr payne of id.
The Suffrygan to sette oyle for the lampes in the Ghurch
above ^ as often times as nedith the payne of a jd.
The Sufii-ygan to se that awbes amys towels & awter clothis ^^
be had to weshyng. The pcurators payeing ther for and to be
redye a genste ffestys the payne of ijd.
The Gierke to be charged w* ryngying of none & curfewe in
principaU ffests and others acordyng wt a solempn and a
convenient pele in lenght at viij of the clokke under payne of
vid toe. qt.
The Suffrygan to wame the pcuratours that the sensours
candyl stykkys and Shipp *® be redye sett fourth be for the laste
pele the payne of id the coope also before every evynsong whan
^ " VisiUiXion of Seke.** In 1540 the pariah of Milend, near Colchester, was
presented to the Archdeacon by the Rector, because in the said Church there
was ^'nother clerke nor sexton to go with him in tyme of visitacion (of the sick)
nor to help him to say masses, nor to rynge to servyce." — Archd. HaJes*
Precedents, p. 113. And at Wyghton the clerk is presented, because when he
ought to go with the Vicar to visit the sick, he absented himself, and sent a boy
with the Vicar.— rori Fabric BoUs, 257.
^ ** Compline pele in Lente season." Compline, or second vespers, at 7 o'clook
on ordinary occasions. But in the Foundation of Eveline temp. Hen. VI., we
find, *' And at iii of the clokke aftyr mete in the seide worke days, ii pelys
Ironge with the sede bell he shaU precede in the seide churche to his Even songe
and continue till compleyn be seyde. Except in the time of Leutyn, when aftyr
the rewle of the churche evensong ys sayede a fore none. " — Heam, Duo Rerum
Anglic, Script, torn, II , p. 551, quoted in Hampsoh's Kalendars of the Middle
Ages, vol. XL, 201. Our President informs me that this rule was to enable the
Priest to break his fast, which he could not do in Lent until after evensong. The
latter portion of the clause commencing from ** and uppon ** is an iiisei-tion
apparently contemporary.
^ •* Church ahove," See introductory note.
^ Albs, amice, towels and altar cloths. The apparells and other embroidery
was usually merely stitched on and readily removable.
^ ** Shipp,** The vessel for incense, so called from its pointed oval form.
After the 12th ceutury it was furnished with a foot and a cover jointed in the
middle.— Walcott^s Sacred ArcJiceologij,
148 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
hit shall be usid the sayd Su&ygan shall se redy m the Quere
undyr payne of id tociens quotiens.
Hit was so accostemyd and nowe agreed of olde that the
Gierke shold take for ryngyng of a Paresthyng ^ ther fro none
un to viij And a morowe ^ fro viij unto none w*- v Bells iij* iiijd
and no more from hens forward undyr the payne of vi« viijd
toe. qc.
Item the undirsofregan whiche at the ordynance her of his
callyd hym (?) shall se that ij Torches *^ on the Sondaye be
brennyng at the hygh masse sacryng. And all or lyghts save
the quyre lyghts a cordyng to evy feste and in the feriall dayes
the su£Erygan to be chargyd wt. the same and wt. the quer lyght
at all times uppon payne of ijd.
The su&ygan and the elerke to weyte upon the quer dayly
and to the Gierke at Gesonys according to kepe the Organs under
payne of iiij toe. qu.
The elerke and the sufi^ ought to sette to churche the crosse ^
as well the poore as ye riche under the payne of ij toe. qu.
The elerke aught not to take no Boke oute of the quere for
chulderyn to lerne in wt. owte lisence of the pcuratours undyr
payne that the curate and the pcutous assign he.
The elerke and the suflfrygan in svyce tyme aught not to
absente them from the quere w^- owte license of the Gurate or his
debite ^ & neither of them to be absent from any Evyn song
messe mateyns or any other devyne service w'- owte license bothe
of the Gurate & of the pcuratos under payne of iiijd toe. quoc.
The sufirygan to se that there be a torche redy for the
messes that is sayde in the churche dayly. And the torches to
put owte fro all man(ner) awtys and the quere payne of id
toe. qu.
The Gierke to fynd ryngars and ropys for the Bellys wt. dewe
serche of the Bawderykys ^ and clapys at all tymes. And suflfy-
ciently to wame the procuratos when nede ys to a mende the
^ "Paresthyng," Parishioner. » "Morowe.** Morning.
3' '« Torcftes" Candles of a large size.
3^ "Sette to Church the CroM,** dx. This is probably an aUasion to the pro-
ceedings at the Adoration of the Cross on Good Friday. It woald, of course, be
absolutely unnecessary now t^ give a direction of this character to Church
officials. ^i" Debits," Deputy.
^ " Bauderykys," Bawdricks. Stout leather straps, by which the clappers
are attached to the bells.
<m < •
Ancient Bristol Documents. 149
sayde Bawderykes •* Claperys and Whelys under such payne as
the curate or his debite w*- the pcto*. & ij or iij of the Whor-
shipfull of the proch will assign as ofte as nede ys.
The clerke and the sufErygan to ryng dayly to hyght masse at
the custenable owre payne of ijd eche of them tociens quociens.
Also the sufErygan to find palme'^ and flanyrs^ a genste
palme sonday at his coste uppon payne of xxd.
And also the Gierke and ye sufirygan to make clene the segys ^
of the ohurche when they be called uppon.
The other thyngs longyng to eny of ther svice the Curate or
his debite w^ the proctors shall certyfye hem when any nede shall
happyn in tyme comyng.
And all theye sayde paynes duly to recue,
To the wele of Seynte Nicholas Churohe.
Deo gras. Bicus Blewett.
Thys ben the Caswell ^ Avaylis ^ longgyng to ye Gierke and ye
SufiErygan.
In p'mus the Clerke to have ye vaylys of the bellys ye Banys
and of evy Pardoner *^ for ye Surplys &c.
Also the Clerke to have ye vaylys *^ on Seynt Nicholas nyght
goengewythsospitati".
Also the Clerke to have ye herse cloth ^ when any such fall ye
35 " BUwing of Palms:' iElfrio says, '* The oiutom exists in God's Gharoh by
its Doctor's established, that everywhere in God's congregation the priest should
bless palm-twigs on this day, and distribute them so blessed to the people."
The earliest known form is in Ecgberht*8 Pontifical. Rock, iv,, 6S, ei aec, for full
description. (The custom is stiU continued in Ifcaly on ** Palm Sunday," the
Sunday before Easter Day. In Venice, sprays of oliye are blessed by the Patri-
arch, and afterwards distributed among the priests and people. — Ed.)
^ '* Flanura." Branches of Willow ? ir^^Scffya," Seats. 3«"Ca«aett." Casual.
» « Avaylia." From which our modem word " yaila " is derived.
^ *^ Pardoner.** The Pardoner was an Ecclesiastic authorised by the Head of
the Roman Church to travel throughout Catholic Europe for the purpose of
vending pardons or indulgences, with the intention of raising a sum for some
special purpose. — Promptorium Parvulorum, Camden Soc., 383.
«< *' Seynt NichoUu night.** See note « Bishop's Gete."
43 ** Sospitati.** Probably the Watchmen, or similar officers, from the verb
sospito, ''I keep safe." Their services might be speciaUy necessary after,
the proceedings at the Mayor's counter.
43 " Herse Cloth.** After the Grand Mass of Requiem was sung over the
oorpse of Abbot Islip, they buried him in the chappeU of his buyldynge, which
6
150 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
is kept uppon ye grave dorynge ye month wt ij lampis on at ye
fete and ye tother at ye bed of grave as ye usage ys.
Itm the Suffrygan to have the vantage of ye Orossis ^ y^* is
to say for evry corse y*. decessith in ye pysh iiijd.
All so ye Suffrygan to have ye vantage of y« Vgyn on All
Hallow day ** wher for he muste se dayly y*- ye vestment of ye
hy aater be foldyd when masse is do & so y put upp &c.
Also wher ht was of old usage yt ye vantage of weddynggs was
longgynge to ye Gierke Therfor to put a way al varyans in tyme
to come byt is ordeyned by ye Agrement of ye pyshons w** ye will
and consent of the Gierke & SufiErygan That ye Suffi-ygan hens
forward shuld have ye avaylys of weddynggs And ye Gierke to
have for a knowlegge of ye same halfe ye avantagge for ye
leyeng of al man hers ^ y* shalbe leyde on ye Ghurch except
for al such hers yt ys yerly kepte of olde fundacon longjrtb to the
SufErygan only &c.
was hangid with blacke doth garajrahed with sohoooheons, and over his sepal-
tare a pawle of blacke veliret and ij candleatiokB with angells of sylyer h, gylte
with ij tapera thereon, and iiij aboat the corpse bamynge still.**— VtA. Hon, Vol.
iv. plates, xy. eta, p. 3. "Then in the qaere ondernethe the hersse was made a
presentacion of the corps oovered with clothe of golde of tyssewe, with a cross
and ij white branches in candle-sticks of sOver and gylte." " The herse with all
tother things did remain there antiU the monthes mynde.** — Ihid^ see also Rwik s
Ohtirch of our FcUhers, vol. ii., p. 517. Henry Seydon by wiU, dated 1400,
directs that he be buried in the crypt of St. Nicholas, and that 5 lbs of wax be
made into 4 tapers, *' vt ardeant circa corpas mev*dao qaol't die ad missam in
diet' Grippa darante quatuor septiman post obitum meam.** — Or€cU Orphan
Book, No. 115.
^ " Vantage of ye OrosH.** According to the 8arum Proce8$ianale, a boy with
holy water foUowed by a cross bearer, headed a faneral procession. — Bodt voL
ii, 470.
4S " il0 HaUowi Day,** First of November, consecrated by Gregory IV. to
the worship of the Virgin and aU Alartyrs and Saints. . On that day the Mayor,
etc., went to All HaUowen Charch, " there to ofi&e," and after ** sondry wines "
at the Maire*s place ** fro thence every man departing anto his parish charch to
evensong.*' Probably on these occasions there were customary gifts made at the
altar of the Blessed Virgin, bat I have been unable to trace any direct statement
to that effect.
^ ** Sera." The Herse, from whence the modem word " Hearse," was a frame
of wood or of metal like a waggon head ; used to support the PaU or " Herse
cloth *' (see ante). They were used not only in the faneral ceremonies but also at
the "Mynde* and Anniversaries.
Ancient Bristol Documents. 151
No. IV.
^n 0omr ^IH 9et)ifi( btlongfttg to tf)e Cf)ur(t) of
By THi Rbv. C. S. TAYLOR, Vioxe.
{Read November lUh, 1886.)
St. Thomas Chtjboh is comparatively rich in ancient documents ;
our registers are complete from 1652, our list of Churchwar-
dens is unbroken from ISSQ, and with the exception of about
thirty years near the beginning of the 18th century (probably
resulting from the loss of a single account book), our Wardens'
accounts are almost complete from the period of the Beformation
to the present day. We have also a very interesting Manuscript
Bible, dating from the beginning of the 15th century.
But I wish to speak this evening of a series of about one hun-
dred deeds, dating from 1294 to about the time of the Beforma-
tion, which have been carefully preserved in the vestry chest.
They are in very good condition, having been kept dry and clean,
and perhaps because nobody knew or cared much about them,
not very many of the seals seem to have been stolen.
So far as I am aware no one knew exactly what they referred
to, till in 1881 1 placed them in the hands of Prebendary Wick-
enden, of Stoke Bishop, who had done good work in examining
and classifying the manuscripts belonging to Lincoln Cathedral.
He very kindly went through all our papers, stating their nature,
and the names of the grantors and grantees.
The further task remained of ranging together all those which
referred to the same property, in order to trace the descent of
each property, so far as these deeds throw light upon it. This I
did myself, and when the work was accomplished I found that
the deeds referred to the pre-Beformation history of certain
houses that now belong to the Church, until in 1566 all the pro-
perties were collected into one feoffment, and have been conveyed
by successive grants to feoffees from that time to this.
But very much to my astonishment I found also the deeds
152 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
under which the properties passed into the possession of the
Church which maintained the Chantry founded by Bichard de
Welles in 1888, at the altar of the Blessed Virgin ; that founded
by Bobert Chepe in 1410, at the altar of St. Nicholas ; and that
founded by John Burton in 1455 at the altar of St. John the
Baptist. John Stoke in 1881 founded a chantry at the altar of
the Blessed Virgin, but no documents are now to be found
which relate to the property of this chantry, perhaps because the
particular houses which formed the endowment were left by will,
while, in the other cases money was left, and the deeds record
the purchase of the properties by the trustees of the chantries.
Of course these chantry properties were taken from the Church
in the time of Edward VI., and it is a very jremarkable thing
that the deeds were not taken as well. The chantry estates
never formed any part of the endowment of the parochial clergy.
The oldest of our deeds is dated November 8rd, 1294, it is a
fine,^ executed in the King's Court at Westminster, before four of
the King's justices, whereby on payment of sixty marks, a tenement
called "Eedehall," passed from the possession of Bobert de
Pembroke and his wife Agnes, and Bobert de Warden and his
wife Johanna to that of John Welysholt. This property is now
known as Penner Wharf in Bedcliff Street.
But perhaps the deeds which possess most general interest
are those which show how the Church acquired possession of the
Cattle Market. On June 4th, 1484, WilUam Spencer and three
others granted to ** Master Nicholas Pittes, Vicar of the Parish
Church of St. Thomas the Martyr " and three others, a piece of
land in Wine Street, which piece John Burton who died in 1456
had bought under the name of two racks.^
The staple occupation of the inhabitants of the parish had
been since the beginning of the 14th century the manufacture of
woollen cloth, which at the Beformation ceased almost entirely,
causing great distress in the parish, and rendering it difficult to
' A fine was a fictitious suit at law before the King or his justices ; the action
was supposed to be founded on a breach of covenant, the defendant made over-
tures of compromise which were accepted, and a formal record of the proceedings
was made in the rolls of the Court. Freehold estates could thus pass without
the formal delivery of possession, and a title by fine was the best that could be
given.
' Racks were machines used for stretching cloth ; the term ''ground for so many
racks " is common in old Bristol d^ds, it still survives in the name " Rackhay."
Ancient Bristol Documents. 153
maintain the almshouse and fountain of water which existed
there. These circumstances were represented to Queen Elizabeth
by the Mayor, and on December 11th, 1570, she granted by letters
patent to the Mayor and Commonalty of the City, the right to
hold a cattle market every Thursday in Thomas Street ; which
right was purchased by the vestry of St. Thomas, on August 20th,
1571, the price paid being the piece of land in Wine Street,
which was then used as a meal market, and on which the Guard
House afterwards stood. The Vestry still possesses the letters
patent, but unfortunately the seal is much broken.
Burton's Almshouse was already in existence in 1885 when
Walter Derby left a legacy to the inmates, and the work of
bringing water in leaden pipes to St. Thomas Church is men-
tioned in the will of John Stoke, who died in 1381, but in 1666
the Vestry had obtained from the Vestry of St. Mary Bedcliff,
the feather of water* which had belonged to the dissolved hospital
of St. John on Bedcliff Hill.
Among other expenses attendant on procuring the letters
patent, two hogsheads of wine were given '' unto my Lord," and
a butt of sack to the Mayor for his trouble.
There is a curious history also attaching to a house known as
the Mansion House, or, Foster's Place, in Temple Street. It was
sold in July, 1535, by Sir John Walsshe, of Little Sodbury, the
patron of Tyndale, to Maude Jubbe, gentlewoman, of Long
Ashton, for £30, and in October of that year she transferred it
to trustees for the maintenance of a priest to officiate in the
alms-house on Bedcliff Hill, and to pray for the souls of all
Christian people ; the residue to be applied to the repairs of St.
Thomas' Church.
The trustees seem to have placed the management of the trust
in the hands of the Churchwardens, and the house is found among
the church properties in the Warden's account of 1552; the priest
disappeared at the Beformation, and the rents of the house are
duly entered in the Church accounts. Queen Elizabeth, however,
seems to have discovered that it was charged with the payment
to the chantry priest, and in 1579 the Vestry had to pay the Queen
3 A "feather of water " was the right to a pipe of a certain diameter to con-
vey water from a spring. Robert de Berkeley gave RedcUff Spring to St. Mary's
Church in 1207, and St. John's Hospital, on RedcUff Hill, was entitled to a pipe
one inch in diameter. St. Thomas' pipe began to run on St. Andrew^s £yo, 1666.
154 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
thirty shillings, in discharge of her claim. In 1869 the house
was sold for street improvements for £889, which, deducting ten
per cent, for compulsory sale, would be about twenty-five times
its purchase value in 1585.
We can trace with very fair accuracy the date at which nearly
all our houses came into the possession of the Church. Some
which stand between the churchyard and the street are, no doubt,
built upon land which had belonged to the Church from the
beginning ; but the first house which the deeds show as having
become a part of the church property, is one in Thomas Street,
which was acquired in 1409. Nos. 88 and 89 Bedcliff Street
came into the possession of the Church in 1425, and Penner
Wharf, with the adjoining house, in 1460.
In 1479 the feoffees of the church bought 18 and 19, St. Peter's
Street, which were described as standing opposite to the Castle
gates, from Henry Poyntz, and his wife Alicia ; and between 1456
and 1496, the Church acquired a piece of land at the corner of
Thomas Street and Mitchell Lane. On April 10th, 1549, William
Butler bought a chamber over the gateway of the Bear Inn, from
Milo and Hugh Partryck, to whom the property of Stoke's
Chantry had been granted by the King, and about 1570 he gave
it to the Church. Finally, a house in Thomas Street was
acquired, I do not know how, between 1608 and 1636.
Thus we see that nearly all the property that the Church
possesses was acquired between 1400 and 1686 ; subsequent bene-
factions were mostly left for the poor.^ The deeds do not state for
what consideration the property passed, so that it is impossible to
say whether they were bought or given, but I expect they were,
for the most part, purchased.
These deeds throw much interesting light upon the manner of
the endowment of town Churches, and at any rate they negative
the absurd idea that Churches were endowed in any way by the
action of the State. These houses passed to the Church by gift
or purchase on the part of individuals or the authorities of the
Church, just as houses might do now.
One of our deeds, bearing date October 28th, 1884, which
4 As St. Thoinaa* Charch was, like St Muy Radcliff and Leigh, mxtil 1852, a
Chapel of Bedminster, it was only neoeMary to provide for the maintenanoe of
the fabric and Mrvioee ; the income of the Clergy was chiefly provided from the
endowments of the mother Charch.
Ancient Bristol Documents. 155
conveys a property in Bedclifif Street, contains the first mention
of the Ganynge family in Bristol, as the name of John Gaimynge
appears among the witnesses. He was, I suspect, the father of
the first William Ganynge, who died in 1896. John was a family
name of the Ganynges, and is found in every generation that can
be traced till the connection with Bristol ceased.
And also we have on a deed bearing date February 2nd, 1852,
one of the ancient seals of the city, before the lilies of France
were quartered on the national flag ; and also one dated Septem-
ber 9th, 1864, with a much more elaborate castle, and a flag, with
the French lilies quartered with the English lions ; this last seal
often occurs subsequently. Mr. Planchd^ thought that the earUer
seal may very likely have been made in the reign of Edward 1st.
Two deeds of the middle of the 15th century record the found-
ation of obits of Henry Gildeney and Margaret his wife, and
Matthew Sherwyn, Thomas Sherwyn, and his wife Isabel. And
finally there are three bonds to keep the peace. On August
29th, 1487, John Lamport, and his wife Johanna, were bound
under a penalty of six pounds of wax to keep the peace towards
John Smalcombe and his wife Isabella. On March 81st, 1458,
Patrick More Weaver was bound to no less personages than the
Mayor and the Ghurchwardens of St. Thomas the Martyr, in a
penalty of twenty shillings, not to molest William Smalcombe,
weaver, in any way.
And on June 19th, 1478, William Arnold, aJia;^ Gillam, was
bound to the Ghurchwardens of St. Thomas the Martyr, in a
penalty of forty shillings, to keep the peace towards Patrick
Grane, oXica Sherman, of Bristol.
It is worth noticing perhaps, as an index of nationality, that
we find two Patricks in these bonds. The Smalcombe family seem
to have had a tendency, perhaps inherited, to fall into hot water.
I have brought for inspection our oldest deed, the deed which
contains the name of John Ganynge, and that which bears the
oldest city seal. Also a rental of 1477, and portions of the Old
Service books, used as covers for Warden's accounts ; the rental
is cut to show the payment of the amount due at each quarter-
day, just as the Exchequer tallies used to be cut.
s On the Mnnioipal Seals, &o., of the City of Briftol, by J. R. Planch^ Somer-
■et Herald, in tht JowmaX qf the BrUith Archaeological AsBoeiation^ toL xxzi,
p. 188, and plate 12, fig. 2.
156 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
^roteetitngs of ti)e Cluib^
1886.
MEETINGS AND EXCURSIONS.
The second Annual Meeting of the Members of the Club took place
on Tuesday, Januaiy 26th, 1886, when, in the unayoidable absence of the
President (Bishop Clifford) the chair was taken by Lieut. -Col. Bramble,
Treasurer.
The financial accounts for the past year having been read by the
Treasurer, and audited by Mr. John Williams, a brief statement of the
proceedings of the Club since the last Annual Meeting was read
by the Hon. Secretary.
The election of Officers and Committee for the year 1886 then took
place, with the following result: — President, the Hon. and Ht. Rev.
Bishop Clifford; Vice-Presidents, Mr. John Reynolds, and Mr.
F. F. Fox; Treasurer, Lieut.-Col. J. R. Bramble ; Secretary, Mr. Alfred
E. Hudd ; Committee, Messrs. W. E. Jones, A. C. Pass, John Taylor,
and Thos. S. Pope.
The Secretary announced the resignation of Mr. Walter Derham, M.A.,
in consequence of his removal to London ; also that two more vacancies
had been created by the election as Honorary Members, by the
unanimous vote of the Committee, of Mr. Thomas Kerslake, and Mr.
William Edkins. The followinggentlemen were then elected as ordinary
members of the Club : — Mr. Francis Fox Tuckett, Mr. Robert Hall
Warren, Mr. John Fuller, and Mr. Arthur Baker.
A paper was read by Col. Bramble, entitled: Extracts from the
Parish Records of St, Nicholas^ Bristol^ in which some curious regulations
for the government of the Church officicds, with their various duties, etc.,
gave much interesting information explanatory of mediaeval ceremonies.
This paper, which is printed at pp. 142-150, gave rise to somediscussioD,
in whicn Mr. J. Taylor, Mr. Pope, Mr. William Thomas and other
members took part. Some of the curious phrases and ceremonies referred
to being somewhat obscure, Col. Bramble promised to add explanatory
notes before publishing the paper.
Mr. John Taylor, Bristol City Librarian, then read a paper on Some
Curiositiei of Church Records, giving many quaint and amusing ex-
tracts relating to baptisms, weddings, and oUier ceremonies of the
Church, during the Middle Ages, which is printed at pp. 96-103.
mmm^im^f^mm^^a^mm^mmmr^^^mm
Proceedings, 1886. 157
SPECIAL MEETING, MAECH 8rd, 1886.
A special meeting was held on March 3rd, 1886, at the house of the
Secretary, to arrange for the work of the session, and to fix on localities
to be yisited during the sxunmer. Among other places mentioned were
Wemberham Roman Villa, Yatton, Hinton Abbey, Wellow, Whitchurch,
Salisbury, and Stonehenge, most of which have since been visited. The
Secretary was requested to endeayour to arrange during the summer for
a two days' excursion to some place of antiquarian interest, and he
promised to do so. This excursion took place in September, the locality
selected being Salisbury, and an account of the proceedings there will be
found on pp. 161-164.
EXCUESION TO WEMBEEHAM EOMAN VILLA, YATTON.
On Saturday, April 8rd, by kind permission of Cecil Smyth-Pigott, Esq.,
a visit was paid by the members of the Section, to the recently discovered
Roman Villa at Wemberham, near Yatton. Some remarks were made at
the villa, by Mr. A. T. Martin, M.A., on this and other Roman remams
in the neighbourhood. The villa^ was probably the residence of the
officer who had charge of the dykes and earthworks for keeping the sea
from overflowing the low country surroimding Yatton, and- is valuable as
evidence of the trouble taken by the Romans in reclaiming land from
the sea. Soon after their departure, the dykes being neglected, the sea
again flowed up to the valley, probably as far as Nailsea, and was only
again reclaimed long after the Norman conquest. On reaching Yatton
the members were met by the vicar, the Rev. Prebendary Walrond, and
the chief features of the very fine parish church were inspected under
the guidance of Col. J. R. Bramble, Mr. T. S. Pope, and the Secretary.
The beautiful west front ^ was much admired, as was also the general
effect of the interior, although the chancel is undoubtedly too small for
the nave. Col. Bramble pointed out the chief peculiarities of the fine
monuments in the Newton chapel, and some of the other architectural
features, after which, by invitation of the Rev. Prebendary and Mrs.
Walrond, a visit was paid to the Vicarage, where the members were
kindly entertained with afternoon tea. A fine 15th century stone fire-
place in the kitchen was examined, and a sketch was made of it by one
of the members present. After thanking their kind hosts for their hos-
pitable reception, the party returned to Bristol by the 5.30 train.
^ Farther aocounta of this villa will be found in the Proceedings of the Somerset-
ahire Arch, 8ocy, for 1885, vol. xxzi, p. 64 ; and in the Proceedings qf the Soc, of
Antiquaries, for 1886, p. 29.
• In a paper on The Perpendicular Architecture of Somerset by Mr. E. A.
Freeman, published in the third volume of the Proceedings of the Somersetshire
Archl. Soc, (1852), the writer savs of this west front that it is ''(^uite worthy of
forming the entrance to an^ small cathedral or abbey," and that it is ''a most
noble and magnificent design, quite unsurpassed among our parochial edifices."
He finds fault however with * ' the very awkward effect " of the central mullion
of the west window.
158 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
EXCURSION TO HINTON CHAETERHOUSE, &c.
On Saturday, May 1st, 1886, the first general meeting of the members for
the year took phice. On reaching Bath, by the 10.8 a.m. train from
Bristol, carriages were in waiting in which the party proceeded through
the beautiful valley of the Avon, passing Claverton with its picturesque
church and old houses, to Limpley Stoke, where the quaint little church
on the hiU was glanced at in passing. On arriving at
HiNTON Chartebhotjse,
they were most kindly received by Mr. andMrs.T. D. Salisbury, under whose
guidance they were conducted round the groimds of Hinton House for an
inspection of the remains of the Carthusian Priory, founded by Ela,
Countess of Salisbury, in 1232. The Hon. Secretary stated that by kind
permission of the owners of the property, the Rev. S. P. and Mrs. Jose,
and of their present host, Mr. Salisbury, he had been allowed to make
some excavations in the orchard near the house, and in other parts of the
grounds, and had found some foundations of walls, which he pointed out
to the members present, some of which had probably formed part of the
great Cloister Court of the monks. So little is known of Carthusian
houses in England, that it is difficult to understand the few remains that
are still left of the Hinton Charterhouse buildings However, having
paid visits to several continental houses of the order, to Mount Grace,
the most perfect of the monasteries remaining in England, and to the
London Charterhouse, the Secretary thought he had some ground for
supposing that the walls discovered in the orchard originally formed part
of the western side of the great Cloister Court of the Priory, which was
exclusively reserved for the use of the monks. The beautiful little 13th
century building to the S.E. of the house, which much resembles in
some particulars the chapel of the Witham Charterhouse, in the same
county, was not the great church of the monastery, of which only a small
fragment remains. The other group of buildings probably formed part
of the Prior's House, which was so situated that the Prior was able
to overlook both cloister courts, one eye on the monastery and one on the
world, so to speak, the latter being represented only by the lay brothers,
and the few passing strangers of the sterner sex, who sought the
hospitality of the monastery. The first English house of the Carthusians
was founded at Witham, in Somersetshire, A.D. 1181, and, as it is hoped
that the members of the Club may visit the remains of that monastery.
Mr. Hudd's paper is withheld upon the subject for the present.
Fasley Castle.
After partaking of some light refreshments at Hinton House, and
thanking Mr. and Mrs. Salisbury for their kind reception, the members
drove to Farleigh Hungerford, where the picturesque ruins of the
Somersetshire residence of the Hungerfords were examined. In the
chapel, the monuments to various members of the family, the arms,
armour, and other antiquities were inspected, and the following note
was read by Mr. F. F. Tuckett upon the Saint to whom the chapel
was dedicated.
Proceedings, 1 886. 1 59
St. Julian, Hospitatob.
Julians, either as saints or martyrs, abound, but the legend of St.
Julian '^Hospitator'' is the most curious and interesting of them all.
He is usually represented in art accompanied by one or other of the
following emblems: — A stag near him; ferrying people over a rirer;
receiving a young leper, as he lands from a boat; a hawk;
a boatman in a barge ; an oar ; and, more rarely I believe, a sword. In
a fine terra-cotta by Andrea della Robbia in the church of the Campo
Santo at Arezzo, this last emblem is seen, and in the predella beneath it
is a very realistic representation of the saint in the act of vigorously
decapitating a sleeping couple in bed. This seemingly inconsistent pro-
ceeding excited my curiosity at Arezzo, but, not having recently read
the curious legend, I turned to Mrs. Jameson's Poetry of Sacred and
Legendary Art, from which the following particulars have been con-
densed by '' £. A. G.'' in Saints and their Symbols.
" 8. Julian Hospitator, A.D. 313, (Husenbeth says 9th century), Jan.
9th, patron saint of travellers, boatmen, and wandering minstrels, was a
rich coimt, who lived in great state, and spent his time in feasting and
hunting. One day, after he had pursued a deer for a great distance, it
turned and spoke to him, saying, ' Thou who pursuest me to death shalt
cause the death of thy father and mother.' Horrified at this prophecy,
and hoping to prevent the possibility of its fulfilment, he would not
return home, but at once rode away to another country. Here he took
service under the kins, and greatly distinguished himself. He also
married and lived happily, quite forgetting the terrible prophecy. But
meantime his parents, distressed at his loss, did not cease to search for him,
and at length came to his castle. Julian was absent at the time, but his
wife, hearing who they were, gave them welcome and put them in her
own chamber to rest. When the Count returned he went straight to his
chamber, and, not recognizing his parents at once, by a fatal mistake
slew them both in a fit of jealous rage. When he had learnt what he
had done he was stupified with horror, but at length, rousing himself,
determined to spend the rest of his life in devotion to God's service, that
so he might be forgiven his fearful sin. He and his wife Basilissa left
that country, and established themselves in a cell near a great river,
which was so often swollen by mountain torrents that many were
drowned in endeavouring to cross it. Here he f oimded a Hospital, and
occupied himself with tending the sick and taking all who asked him
across the river. One night, while a storm was raging, he heard a voice
calling to him, and going out he found a leprous youth lying on the
opposite shore. Julian ferried him across, and, as he seemed almost
dying from cold and exhaustion, laid him on his own bed and watched
him tenderly. Just as morning dawned a light shone from the leper's
face, and he rose up, saying, ' Julian, the Lord hath sent me to thee, for
thy penitence is accepted, and thy rest is at hand,' and then vanished
from their sight. Julian and his wife fell down and praised God for his
mercy, and soon afterwards they both died peacefully." '
3 Hospitals for Lepers were often dedicated to St. Jalian. A different account
of the saint to the above is given by the late Rev. H. J. B. Nicholson, D.D.,
F.S. A, in the little Guide to the Abbeyof St, AJhan (1882) p. 13, as follows :—
"Julian and Bardissa his wife lived in E^pt and applied theur property and their
time to the relief of the poor and sick, fittinff up tneir house suitably for their
comfort. They suffered martyrdom in 313, &c.
i6o Clifton Antiquarian Club,
The incident of the leper has a striking similarity to that of the child
in the legend of St. Chnstopher.
The Secretary read some notes by Mr. John Taylor on the subject of
the murder of her first husband, John Cottell, by Agnes, afterwards
Lady Hungerford, and on her execution at Tyburn, in 1523.
Luncheon haying been partaken of, the drive was continued to
Norton St. Philip,
where the very picturesque, half-timbered, 15th century hostelry, the
" George Inn," was the first object of interest noticed. The fine Per-
pendicular Church, dedicated to St. Philip and St. James, was examined
under the guidance of the Vicar, the Rev. H. B. Bumey, who pointed
out its chief features, which have been described by Mr. Freeman in
the Proceedings of the Somersetshire Archaological Society y Tol. xxi.,
p. 47, as *' eccentric from beginning to end." The naye arcade is
peculiar, no two arches being alike. There is an interesting canopied
tomb to an unknown merchant in the naye, and in the south porch the
Secretary pointed out some remains of what seemed to haye been a
'* Porch Gallery," such as were once common in Somersetshire, though
not much known elsewhere. The western tower is rich and massiye,
though rather peculiar. A drive of a few miles through pretty country
lanes, g^y with spring flowers, brought the party to
Wellow,
where the beautiful Church, one of the finest in this division of the county,
was visited. It is said to have been nearly rebuilt about a.d. 1372, by Sir
Walter Hungerford, and has since been '* restored." It contains a hand-
some oak chancel-screen, a fine timber roof, an Early -English font, a curious
pillar-piscina, and some interesting monuments. In the north wall of
the chancel is a fine effigy of a priest, probably of the 14th century ;
he is habited in chasuble, amice, alb and stole, his feet resting on a lion,
and is remarkable for a deeply-impressed cross carved on his forehead,
and a chalice carved in relief upon his breast. Over the south door are
two large canopied niches, side by side, the object of which is not
evident, the church being dedicated, like the chapel at Farley, to St.
Julian. Had time permitted, it had been intended to have paid a visit
to the remains of the celebrated Chambered Tumulus, situated on the
hill-side at Stoney Littleton, about three-quarters of a mile from Wellow,
but it was only possible to get a distant view of this '' long barrow,"
which is supposed to have been constructed perhaps as long as two
thousand years ago, possibly by the same race who erected the mega-
lithic circles at Avebury and Stanton Drew. Dr. Beddoe, promised a
short paper on the subject for one of the evening meetings, which he has
since given. This paper will be found at pp. 104-108.
Returning to Bath by way of Odd Down, the remains of Wansdyke
and of the Roman road were passed. Dinner was served at the White
Lion Hotel, after which the return journey to Bristol was made by the
8 15 train. The weather having been fine, quite an old-fashioned May
day in fact, and the drive being through some of the most beautiful
scenery in the county, the excursion was much enjoyed.
Proceedings, 1886. 161
EXCUESION TO
WILTON, SALISBUEY, STONEHENGE, &c.
At the request of several members of the Club an excursion extending
over two days was carried out on Wednesday and Thursday, the 8th and
9th of September, 1886, when some of die most interesting of the
antiquities of south Wiltshire were visited. In the absence of the
President on the Continent, the excursion was under the guidance of the
Treasurer and the Honorary Secretary. Leaving Bristol in a saloon
carriage by the 8.30 a.m. train, the ancient town of Wilton was reached
about 10 o'clock, and, by kind permission of the Earl of Pembroke, a
visit was made to Wilton House, which occupies the site of the ancient
monastery, founded a.d. 800, re-founded bv King Alfred, and which was
long one of the most celebrated nunneries m England. The *' Pembroke
Marbles," an interesting collection of Greek and Roman antiquities, and
the splendid gallery of paintings, chiefly of the German and Flemish
schools, with some grand works of Vandyck, were inspected. The
house, conmienced temp, Elizabeth, has a porch designed by Holbein,
and other ancient features. The beautiful church erected by Wyatt,
which contains some 13th and 15th century stained glass, ancient
mosaics, &c., was afterwards visited. The journey was then continued to
Salisbuby,
where, after luncheon had been partaken of, visits were paid to the
Cathedral, the Poultry Cross, the Church of St. Thomas, and other
interesting remains of mediaeval architecture.
At the Cathedral the members were received by the Hon. and Rev.
Canon Gordon, and the Rev. Succentor Lakin, and, in addition to the
numerous treasures of architecture and sculpture usually seen by visitors,
some ancient rings, chalices, &c., preserved in the Treasury, and a 15th
century chasuble, and other interesting antiquities were examined. In
the nave. Col. Bramble made some remarks on the fine series of monu-
mental effigies, especially on that of the so-called *'Boy Bishop."
Under the able guidance of the Rev. librarian, an instructive half -hour
was spent in the library, where the original Sarum copy of Magna
Charta, and many other valuable MSS., dating from the 10th to the 16th
century, some early printed books, &c., were exhibited and described.
After thanking the Rev. Succentor Lakin for his kind reception, the
members left the Cathedral by the western doorway, and proceeded to
visit other remains of mediaeval architecture in the city. The fine
fresco painting over the chancel arch in the church of St. Thomas the
Martyr was examined, but could not be well seen owing to the fading
light. It represents the *' Last Judgement," and is imdoubtedly one of
the finest works of its kind remaining in England. In the ** Swayne
chapel " in the same church are remains of other frescoes, though not
of so important a character as the large one above-mentioned, which
was discovered not long since, during some repairs to the church.
Dinner was partaken of at the White Hart Hotel, where accomodation
for the night had been secured t
1 62 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
On Thursday, September 9th, some of the members paid a visit to the
interesting old building, known as '* the Halle of John Halle," the
Refectory or Banqueting Hall of John Halle, merchant and wool-
stapler, four times Mayor, and Member of Parliament for Salisbury, who
died in 1479. The fine and lofty roof of black oak, the carved oak
screen at the south end, and other canred woodwork, reminded the
Bristol visitors of the somewhat similar and nearly contemporary
^* Canynges House" in Redcliffe Street, but the Salisbury building has
been more fortunate in retaining much more of its original work. The
windows still contain much ancient stained glass, with shields of
arms, various badges — fleur-de-lys, planta-genista, bear and ra^ed
staff, etc. — and a portrait of John Halle, himself, '^ in his habit as he
lived," a good example of a merchant's costume of the time of Ed-
ward IV. Some of ^e windows have also scrolUlike labeb, bearing an
inscription variously read Prebe or Crete, the meaning of which has
given rise to much discussion ; possibly it was, as some suppose, the trade
'^ pass word " of the Woolstaplers Guild. An exhaustive account of all
that could be gathered concerning John Halle and his house was pub-
lished by the late Rev. Edward Duke, F.S.A., in his Prolusiones His-
toricae, with several illustrations.
Leaving Salisbury about 10 a.m., the members drove to
Old Sarum,
where short accounts were given by Mr. F. F. Tuckett, Mr. A. Warren,
and the Honorary Secretary, of the curious history of this deserted city.
It seems difficult to realize that this bare-looking hill, almost without
any sign of habitation, was, only a few centuries ago, a thriving City,
with a beautiful Cathedral, a strong Castle, and numerous thickly-
populated streets, the whole being surrounded by strong walls of Roman
and Norman masonry. Though nearly all this has disappeared, the site
is still one of considerable interest, its huge earth-works being among
the finest left to us of the period anterior to the Roman invasion.
The late Mr. Edward T. Stevens, F.S.A., wrote an excellent descrip-
tion of the antiquities of the neighbourhood of Salisbury for the Wilt-
shire ArchsBological Society in the year 1876, which was afterwards
published imder the title of Jottings of some of the objects of interest in
the Stonehenge excursion^ and is still the best guide-book to this part of
the county. On pages 24 to 41 a good account is given of the ancient
history and existing remains of " this very remarkable place, in some
respects the most noteworthy m Britain." After centuries of occupa-
tion as one of the chief towns of the coimtry under Britons, Romans,
Saxons, Normans, Old Sarum rapidly declined in importance on its
desertion by Bishop Richard le Poer, in 1258, and although it con-
tinued to return two members to Parliament, until the passing of the
Reform Bill, not a single house stood upon its site.
Amesburt
was next visited, where the church and remains of the monastery,
founded in a.d. 980, by Queen Elfrida, were inspected under the
guidance of the vicar, the Rev. Arthur Phelps, and of Mr. Kemm, who
Proceedings, 1886. 163
had kindly prepared a short paper on its history and architecture. Few
remains are left of the Priory, which was granted at the dissolution to
the Earl of Hertford, afterwards Protector Somerset, who built a resi-
dence out of the old buildings, which is now the property of Sir
Edmund Antrobus. Here the poet Gay is said to have composed the *' Beg-
gar's Opera." The writer of the account of Amesbury in Murray's Guide
to Wiltshire, Dorsetshire and Somersetshire^ 1884, p. 114, says of the
Nunnery : — '* It increased in splendour and in Royal favour and became a
fayourite retreat of ladies of royal or noble birth. Eleanor, of Brittany,
daughter of GeofErey Plantagenet and sister of Prince Arthur, became a
nun here, where she was buried, after her death in St. James* s Priory,
Bristol.** Readers of Mr. John Taylor's Ecclesiastical History of Bristol^
will hardly need to be reminded of the real facts of the case. The
Princess lived in captivity for about twenty years in Bristol Castle, died
there August 10th, 1240, was buried in St. James's Priory Church,
Bristol, and, in the same year, her body was translated to Amesbury.
On the invitation of Mr. J. Edwards, a visit was paid to his interest-
ing collection of antiquities from the neighbourhood, including the 16th
century Chancel Screen from Amesbury Church, removed when the
church was *' restored," and some bronze and other objects from the
Barrows. Luncheon was then partaken of at the George inn, after
which a start was made for Stonehenge, passing the site of the ancient
British village formerly known as *^ Vespasian's Camp," and other
pre-historic remains.
Stonehenge.
On reaching the stones, a short paper on the probable origin and uses
of the monument was read by Mr. Algernon Warren, in which he
brought forward what he believed to be a new theory as to the locality
from whence " the foreign stones " of the inner circle were originally
brought to England. It is well known that no such stone is now to be
found nearer than Ireland or Scotland, but Mr. Warren stated that he
had recently met with a gentleman, Captain Tronson, late of H. M.
Indian Navy, who had informed him that during a late visit to Norway
the captain of a Norwegian steamer pointed out to him on the shore of
the Hardanger Fjord, '' the place where the stones came from that you
Englishmen think so much of," and told him that it was currently
reported and believed by the natives of the district, that the glacier had
cut away the rocks from the shore of this Fjord, and that the boulders
had been floated off on the ice to the south of England, where they had
been set up by the inhabitants of the island, and used for religious
ceremonies. Captain Tronson said he had inspected the rocks at the
place pointed out to him, and that they certainly bore a great resem-
blance to the stones at Stonehenge. Nothing was known as to the
period at which this alleged transfer took place, whether during the
glacial epoch or within historic times, but as the locality which produced
ike stones of the inner ellipse is still unknown, no such stone being
found in Wiltshire, it might be worth while to submit specimens of
the Norwegian stone to Professor Maskelyne, or some other capable
authority, ior comparison with the Stonehenge Felsite, Schist, and
4 Bristol Past and Present, vol. ii. pp. 42, 43. Annates de Tkeokesburie, 111.
164 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Diabase. In the absence of history we cannot afford to completely
ignore tradition.
Mr. Warren referred to several of the old theories respecting the
origin and uses of the momiment, and to some of the more recent ideas
on the subjett. In the discussion which followed, the Rev. A. Phelps,
Mr. F. F. Tuckett, and the Secretary took part. Mr. Hudd read some
extracts from the ** Report on the present condition of Stonehenge,*'
recently published by the Wiltshire Society, and, after an examination
of the stones, it was the opinion of all present that measures ought to
be taken without delay to protect the remains from further injury;
several of the stones mentioned in the Report bearing decided traces of
recent chipping, it was feared that imless precautions be at once taken,
as suggested, still more serious damage may be done.
Of the numerous accounts ancient and modem, descriptive of the
megalithic remains at Stonehenge, that by the late Mr. W. Long, F.S.A.,
published by the Wilts Archaeological Society, is by far the best and
most exhaustive. In addition to a history of the various theories that
have been given to account for the remains, Mr. Long gives an
interesting description of the present condition of the monument. It
has been well said by a modem historian that *' the amount of research,
the meditation, and the versatile mental labour wasted on these stones,
resolve themselves into an interesting psychological phenomenon. They
are in themselves a monument of how hard it is to convince man that
anything is a dead secret to him.'' ^ Notwithstanding all this labour,
Stonehenge remains at the end of the 19th century almost as great a
mystery as it was two hundred years ago. Perhaps the opinion now
most generally held by antiquaries who have studied the subject is that
in its present form, it is a relic of the Bronze Age, dating probably from
500 to 100 B.C., though some portion of the monument may date from
far earlier times. The suggestion that Stonehenge was a temple of the
Belgae south of the Wansdyke, and that Avebury was a much more
ancient temple of the older people whom the Belgae had dispossessed,
seems a reasonable one.
There can be little doubt but that both were connected with the
numerous sepulchral remains in their vicinity, and the fact that near
Avebury there are several ** long barrows " in which no trace of metal
has been found, while in the '* round barrows" near Stonehenge,
numerous bronze implements were discovered, certainly favours the
theory that the monimients were the work of different ages and peoples.
A short drive across the Downs brought the members to the fine old
Elizabethan, or rather Jacobean, mansion called
Lake House,
where by the kind invitation of the Rev. Edward Duke a most inte-
resting and valuable collection of antiquities from the barrows in the
neighbourhood was examined, and a short account of some of the more
noteworthy objects was given by the owner. Several of these, includ-
ing the unique objects in amber, have been figured in Archseological
Journals, and other works, and are amongst the most valuable relics that
have been discovered of prehistoric man in Britain. Some account of
s Bwrton*% HiHory 0/ Scotland, vol L p. 145 (1867).
Proceedings, 1886. 165
tliis collection will be found in Ancient Wilts, toI i. p. 212, where Sir
R. C. Hoare described some little curious articles of bone from
" Barrow No. 20 " as a " perfect novelty ; we are at a loss to conjecture
what their meaning and their usage were." It has been suggested that
they were used in playing some game, or in casting lots. The most
important of the amber objects were found in '' Barrow No. 21 " of
the Lake group, -and have been described and figured by the late Dr.
Thurman in Archcsologia, vol. xliii., and by Dr. Stevens, Jottings,
pp. 59-63.
After thanking Mr. and Mrs. Duke for their very kind reception, and
the opportunity of inspecting their interesting collection, the members
regretfully turned their backs upon the charming old house and drove
to Salisbury, whence they returned to Bristol by an evening train.
WHITCHUECH, NOETON MALREWAED AND THE
WANSDTKE.
On September 18th, 1886, a Saturday, afternoon excursion of
the members took place. Leaving Bristol about 2.30 p.m., they drove
to Whitchuirch where, in the absence of the Vicar, the Rev. J. Carter,
the interesting 12th century architectural remains, transition between
Norman and Early English, the late 15th century carved oak screen,
the 16th century oak alms -box, and other features were pointed out and
commented upon by Mr. T. Pope. Some few fragments of mediaeval
domestic architecture remain in the village, the most interesting of
which are at Lyons Court, where a large 14th century arch, a small
square window, and other portions of the ancient mansion of the Lyons
family are incorporated in '* Court Farm '' house. Li the field south of
this house, between it and Maes Knoll Camp, remains of two stone cofiBns
were found in the spring of 1886, which are still preserved on the
premises. In making a deep drain a very roughly made cofBn of stone
containing human bones, covered by flat slabs of oolite, was discovered,
from 2 to 3 feet below the surface, and a few yards from it a stone cover
of another coffin was found lying at an angle of about 45<>. No other trace
of the second coffin could be seen, and no coins or potterv was found.
The remains belong probablv to the Romano-British period, between
the withdrawal of the Roman legions and the arrival of the Saxons.
In 1874, a jar containing several thousand Roman coins — some of
which were exhibited at an evening meeting of the Club, on November
11th, by the Secretary — ^was found in a field about a mile west of Lyons
Court.«
On reaching Norton Malreward, the members were met by the
Rector, the Rev. Wm. Marshall, and by Mr. Samuel Cashmore, who called
Attention to the few remaining fragments left by the *' restorers " of the
Parish Church, the chief of which is the fine late Norman Chancel
arch, and some interesting sepulchral slabs in the porch. A brief visit
was made to Maes Knoll Camp, from whence
The Wavsdykb
in its eastward course towards Stantonbury, was pointed out by the
« BrUtot Past and Presmi, voL i. p. 26.
1 66 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Secretary, who stated that since the previous yi^it of the Club to Mae»
Knoll, in May, 1884, he had, with two other members of the Club, walked
oyer and examined the greater portion of the remains of the Dyke in the
three counties of Somerset, Wilts, and Berks, a walk which he could
strongly recommend to any of those present who enjoyed a few days
ramble in the coimtry. In the spring, when for miles of its course the
dyke and its vallum are a perfect mass of wild flowers — ^primroses,
violets, anemonies, wild hyacinth, celandines, etc. — ^it is transformed into
a thing of beauty not soon to be forgotten by those who have had the
pleasure of seeing it, and, as in its course from Maes EnoU to the wood-
lands of Berkshire, the crests of the hills are generally followed, one get»
the advantage of bracing air and extensive prospects, in addition to the
** mild excitement," mentioned by Sir Richard Colt Hoare, of tracing
the dyke from field to field, over hill and dale, fields, woods and rivers,
the *' scent,'' at times faint, being recovered time after time, and fol-
lowed, perhaps without a break for miles. As both the eastern and
western terminations of the Dyke are somewhat of a mystery, there is
yet work to be done here by explorers, without going far from home.
On returning to Norton Mabreward, the members were most hospit-
ably entertain^ by Mr. and Mrs. Cashmore (Norton Court), and mer
thanking their hosts for their kind reception the party returned to
Bristol by road, a drive of about five miles.
MEETING, NOVEMBEE 11th, 1886.
Bishop Cliffokd, Pbesident, in the Chaib.
The following exhibitions of objects of antiquarian interest were
made : —
1. By Dr. John Beddoe, F.R.S. (by permission of the authorities of
the Bristol Museum): Human remains from the Stoney
Littleton tumulus (in illustration of paper on the subject).
2. By the Hon. Secretary : About 30 small copper coins found in a
ditch, one mile north of Maes Ejioll, in 1874, lent for exhibi-
tion by Mr. George Harding, of Fishponds. These coins
formed part of the large find described by the late Mr.
NichoUs m Bristol Past and Present, vol. i. p. 25 , and referred
to above, in connection with other late Roman or Romano-
British remains found in the neighbourhood. They are pro-
bably of 4th century date.
8. — ^By Col. Bramble: Impression of Seal, probably of Bruton,
Grammar School, of which an amusing account was given.
The inscription on the seal Je fiknlt of Vnte had been sup-
posed by the present owners to belong to a medieval guild of
Brewers.
4. — ^By Mr. R. Hall Warren : Portraits of two French ecclesiastics of
the 17th century, inlaid in tortoiseshell, pearl, buhl, etc.
5. — ^By Mr. C. J. Trusted. Two models in bog oak of Irish antiquities,
a ** round tower " and a " celtic cross, the originals of which
had been visited during the summer by Mr. Trusted who made
Proceedings, 1886. 167
some remarks on tlie yery interesting details of these early
Celtic structures.
6. — ^By the Rev. Chas. S. Taylor : Ancient documents belonging to
the Church of St. Thomas, Bristol, (in illustration of paper).
7.— By the Hon. Secretary. Bones and other remains from a Romano-
British interment recently found near Farmborough, Somerset,
(in illustration of paper).
The first paper of the eyening i^as by Dr. Beddoe, F.R.S., on The
Human remains from Stoney Littleton Tumultu, now preserved in the
Bristol Musemn, to which they were presented by the late Rey. John
Skinner, of Claverton. This paper is printed at pp. 104-108.
Mr. Thomas W. Jacques followed, with a paper on the subject of the
Ancient Camps near Bristolywiih. suggestions for a systematic inyestigation
of their remains by the Club, and for the preparation of an archsological
map of the Bristol District, upon which all prehistoric and Roman
remains should be recorded.
The Rey. C. S. Taylor, M.A., read a parper on Some Ancient Docu-
ments belonging to the Church of St. Thomas^ Bristol^ most of which he
exhibited. This is printed at pp. 151-155, being No, IV. of the Old
Bristol Documents published in our Proceedings, a series of which it is
hoped to continue in future yolumes. Many such interesting documents
remain in Bristol which haye not hitherto been printed.
The Hon. Secretary, (Mr. Alfred E. Hudd, F.S.A.), read a short paper
on a recently discoyered Romano- British interment at Farmborough ^
which is printed at pp. 109-113.
Seyeral Members took part in the discussion which followed the
reading of these papers.
In reply to a question by the President as to the proposed excayations
on the site of the Roman station at Sea Mills, (Abone), Mr. A. T.
Martin stated that permission had recently been giyen by Mr. Tagart and
Mr. Eyens, and that he hoped to commence digging there shortly.
MEETING DECEMBER 15th, 1886.
Bishop Cliffobd, Pbbsibskt, in thb Chjlib.
The Hon. Secretary gaye notice of some proposed alterations of Rules,
to be brought before the next Annual Meeting.
Mr. F. F. Tuckett exhibited numerous specimens of 17th century
silyer and silyer gilt buttons worn by the Swedish and Norwegian
peasantry ; also articles canred by Lapps from reindeer bones, and an
engrayed silyer '* peg tankard,*' or rather cup with 3 p^^^, dated 1684.
Seyeral sketches, a collection of photographs of the principal existing
Norw^ian '* Stayekirker," and of caryed portals, bench ends, etc. (in the
museums of Christiania and Bergen), of others which haye been destroyed,
together with Professor Dahl's yolume and some others illustrating the
subject of Mr. Tuckett's paper, were also shown by him, as weU as a
7 King Eadgar is said to have ordered that ''pegs should be fastened into
drinking horns at stated distances, and whoever dxaok beyond his peg at one
dranghC should be liable to severe punishment."
1 68 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
curious wooden Norsk *' scratcliback," 21 inches in length, bearing the
date of 1763, and the following rhyming inscription on the flattened,
toe-shaped expansion at the extremity, whose under surface is roughened
by two sets of grooyes at right angles to one another, to obtain the
desired friction : —
Klaa Haa or Scratch Away
min my
Store Taae Big Toe
dot it
Er ndepaa (T lidepa*) la ?
Much information respecting these curious implements is giyen in vol.
xxY. of the Journal of the British Archaological Association^ by Mr.
H. Syer Cuming, in a paper on the Scalptorium, or Scratch-back. They
were in use until recently in England and many other countries, but were
generally made in the form of a small hand on the end of a long handle,
Tcry different in appearance to the curious specimen shown by
Mr. Tuckett.
Mr. Alfred C. Pass exhibited flint implements, worked flakes, human
and other bones, and other objects from his recent excavations at Silbury
Hill, Wilts, described in his paper on the subject. Also a Roman coin,
(1st brass of Marcus Aurelius), and a small iron arrow-head, from Sil-
bury ; found nearer the surface than the other antiquities.
Mr. Tuckett read a paper on Ancient Wooden Churches of Norway
which was followed by Mr. Alfred C. Pass, with an account of his
Recent Excavations at Silbury Hill^ Wilts.
Bishop Clifford, Dr. Beddoe, Mr. Prankerd, and other Members, took
part in the discussion which followed the reading of these papers, both
of which are printed in this yolume, at pp. 114-129 and pp. 130-135.
349*^7 * wnaHTAoa., MKiM.
Clifton Antiquarian Club. 169
ancient Bristol documents.
No. V.
jTrom tfte »ecorliJf of *t* iWarp4e^-5ort
By Libut.-Col. J. R. BRAMBLE, P.S.A., V.P.
{Read November \2th, 1884.)
THE oldest of the deeds belonging to the Parish of St.
-'" Mary-le-Port is a conveyance of a shop in St. Mary-le-Port
Street from William Langbord to Walter Panes. It probably
relates to a house on the south side of the street, now numbered
82, and in the occupation of Messrs. Butler. In subsequent
deeds this house is spoken of as "before the Harts-homes,"
evidently the former sign by which the house opposite was
designated.
The document in question is written on vellum, 7| inches
wide by 5J inches deep, exclusive of J of an inch turned up at
the bottom, as is the usual custom to this day. The writing is
admirable, firm, clear and distinct. It is no doubt the finest
specimen of writing in the whole collection of Charters, and
proves that the writer, not improbably " John of the Temple,
Clerk," must have been a most accomplished penman. The
ink is scarcely faded, and shines in the sun like an enamel
on the surface of the vellum.
Below hangs, by the usual double strip of parchment, the half
of a seal of dark green wax, which still bears the impression
of the fingers which squeezed it into shape. The seal was
evidently heraldic, the bearings have the appearance of a stag
regardant, but the portion remaining is too small to be clearly
identified. In the margin are the letters S. WILL . LAN
The date is about 1250, but cannot be given with certainty.
As usual, in early deeds relating to property in a city, the
Vol. I., Part III. (1887—8.) 1
lyo Clifton Antiquarian Club.
witnesses are the Civic Officers, the Mayor and Pradpositors, with
others. The present witnesses are stated to be "Roger de
Bercham, then Mayor of Bristol!, Robert de Kyhneynan and
Roger de Cantoc, then Prepositors of the same city." In none of
the existing Rolls of Mayors — they differ much in their earlier
portions, which have evidently been compiled — do these names
occur together. The name of Roger de Bercham appears in
Ricart's Calendar as Mayor 1257, but the Prepositors are Hugo
Mychell and William de Berwyck. In the list printed by Barrett
the name does not appear in the list of Mayors, but as that of a
Prepositor in 1267. Robert de Eilmeynan appears in Ricart's list
as Prepositor in 1248, and as Mayor in 1256 and 1262. In
Barrett's list as Prepositor in 1240 and Mayor in 1261. Roger
Cantock appears in Ricart's list as Prepositor 1238, and in
Barrett's list 1287, and (query whether the same man) 1260,
and, under the altered name of Seneschal, 1271. Reginald de
Panes and Thomas Haselden (or '^ de Hamelesden ") also appear
in the same lists between 1247 and 1274.
The difference of a year is readily intelligible, as the election
took place at Michaelmas, and therefore up to the 1st March
following, four months, would have been in one year, and the
remainder in the following year.
Scient psentes & futuri quod Ego Willmus Langbord Filius
& hes Henr Langbord quondam Burgens de Bristoll Dedi
concessi & hac psenti carta mea confirmavi Walter de
Panes totam illam seldam meam cu ptinentes In villa Bristoll
In vico Ste Marie que pxima est selde Henr Langbord fratris
mei. Habendam et tenendam totam ilia pdtam seldam cu
omibus ptinent suis sibi Walter de Panes & hedibs &
assignatis suis de me et hedibs & assignatis meis. libe et quiete
pacifice & integre. ad faciend inde totu libitu sun in omibs
inppetum. Reddendo inde annuatim michi & hdibs et assignatis
meis. ipe Walte & hedes et assignat sui Unu par albaru
Cyrotetarum de ptio unius oboli argenti ad Pascha p omibs
surtiis exactionibs. queret et demandis ad dtam seldam
ptinentibus. Et p hac mea donatione concessione & psentis
carte mee confirmatone dedit michi pdtus Walto. Quadginta
solidoB estlingorum de futroim (?) Quare Ego dtus WHlmus
Langbord & hedes & assignati mei. pdcam seldam cu ptinentis
Ancient Bristol Docmnents. 171
suis. pdco Walto de Panes & hedibs & assignatis suis. conta
omes mortales inppetum warantizabimus defendemus &
acquetabimus p surtm pdcm Et ut hoec mea donatio concessio
& psentis carte mee confirmatio. pptue firmitatis robur
optineant psentem cartam sigilli inpssione roboravi. His
testibs Eogo de Bercham tuc maiore Bristol!. Bobto de
Kylmeynan & Rogo de Cantoc tuc eiusdem ville ppostis Ric
Fuaene Eeginaldo de Panes. Thorn. HazUeden Walto Wyneman
Ric tinctore Johne de Templo clico & aliis.
TRANSLATION.
[Know all (men) present and future that I William Langbord
Son and heir of Henry Langbord formerly Burgess of Bristol
have given conceded and by this my present deed have confirmed
to Walter de Panes all that my shop with its appurtenances, in
the town of Bristol, in the Street of St. Mary, which is nearest
the shop of Henry Langbord my brother. All the said shop with
its appurtenances to be had and holden to him, Walter de Panes
and his heirs and assigns, of me and my heirs and assigns, freely
and quietly, peaceably and entirely to do therein at his entire
liberty in all things for ever. Yielding from thence yearly
to me and my heirs and assigns, by Walter himself, and his heirs
and assigns, a pair of white Gloves of the price of one silver penny
at Easter for all services, exactions, claims and demands to the
said shop appertaining. And for this niy gift, concession and
my present deed of confirmation, the said Walter gave to me
twenty pounds sterling of for which I the said William
Langbord, my heirs and assigns the said shop with its
appurtenances to the said Walter de Panes and his heirs and
assigns against all mortals for ever will warrant defend and
acquit for the aforesaid services. And that my gift, concession,
and my present deed of confirmation may for ever obtain strength
of firmness (be firmly established) I have strengthened the
present deed with the impression of (my) seal. These being
the Witnesses, Roger de Bercham, then Mayor of Bristol, Robert
de Kylmeynan and Roger de Cantoc, then Prepositors of the
same town, Richard Fuaene, Reginald de Panes, Thomas
Hazlleden, Walter Wyneman, Richard the Dyer, John of the
Temple, Clerk, and others.]
172 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
^otes on #lti Bristol ||ou$(e9*
By THOMAS S. POPE, Architect.
(^Read January 27(h, 1887.)
As modern changes seem likely soon to obliterate nearly every
vestige of the ancient domestic architecture of our city, I wish to
bring before the notice of the Club some little known remains of
old Bristol which still exist in some cellars in High street. I
have made measured drawings of these remains, and have
the pleasure of presenting copies for the Club Album.
The chamber shown in my sketch No. 1 (Plate xviii., fig. 1), of
the present cellar of No. 43, High street, was probably the shop
or store of the mediaeval merchant or tradesman who inhabited
the house, and was probably some few feet only below the level of
the street, the level of which was altered when the present Bristol
Bridge was built. There are still some shops remaining on the
Continent very similar to this in arrangement The sitting-room,
or solar, was probably over the shop, and wainscotted with oak, the
great Hall being behind ; as was formerly the case in some of
the old houses in Bedcliff street, which had open roofs with the
timbers exposed.
Of these merchants' halls there are few remains, but some idea
may be formed of their style and proportions from the " restored "
specimen in Canynge's house, Eedcliflf street,^ now occupied by
Messrs. Jefferies, and in the old house in Small street, now
used as the Law Library .^ When the Club visited Salisbury, in
September, 1886, we saw a still finer example in " the Hall of
John Halle.''^
The front of this old house in High street has some of the
'See Skelton'a Antiquities of Bristol. Plate 48. 'Id, PI. 13.
3lUustrated and described in the Rev. E. Dake's Prohisioiwa HiMorkce.
PlateXYm.
V
illlllll
^^„^^
y-
z.f
2 .'Oecrioti^ «^ Mol«(ia39
riQ.3. Rtlar id
^ Cdtar
^ r^^r ^ Nelson et
*'^ j 11 Hi<,fcL'=>r«rf.
y^ fig.4"Pto.n.
Notes on Old Bristol Houses. 173
timber work remaining, although the barge-boards are un-
fortunately gone ; it has been divided into two, including
Mr. Day's house and shop, and still forms quite a handsome
block. When new, it must have been very picturesque, taken in
connection with the old Bristol Bridge and the houses upon it.
In his Antiquities of Bristol, Dallaway remarks of these
" profitridissimi cellarii regis,' as William Wyrcestre calls them, that
they were formerly very numerous, and formed, in fact, " subter-
ranean Bristol" He thus describes ** the house of the ancient
Burgess of Bristow: — The souterrain was a very large cellar
with a groined and ribbed roof of stone, and when extending
under the street,* divided by arches and pillars. Such instances
are not so frequent as those covered by timber beams. In these
were deposited the heavier goods. The ground floor was divided
into narrow shops, three or four upon the same ground plan,
with stalls or bulkheads, and open to the street. ... In the
houses of the chief merchants there was built behind these shops,
a Hall with a high arched roof of timber frame. It served to
hold . . . the more valuable goods, and at set times for their
feasts. The first floor contained the habitable house, bedrooms,
parlour, kitchen, all of which are mentioned in deeds and wills,
and lastly garrets, which had two projecting stories under the
roof,"^ which were used for drying clothes.
William Wyrcestre describes no less than 189 of these cellars
or vaults under the houses in '^Hygh strete, Brad strete,
Wynch strete, Castel Strete," &c. Cellars vaulted in stone, with
pointed arches without much ornament, remain in some of these
streets. Of one of these, at No. 22, High street, I give a plan and
section (Plate xviii., fig. 4). Judging from the details and
mouldings, I should think this was of 15th century date, but it is
rather pecuHar work.
There was an Act passed, t. Edward III., compelling persons
* When the old houses at the comer of Com street and Nicholas street were
pulled down, in 1851, for the new building for Messrs. Stuckey's Bank, a large stone-
vaulted crypt, extending under the street, was discovered ; this was supposed to be
the ancient crypt of the destroyed church of St. Leonard, the tower of which
stood over the west end of Com street. In 1858, a large vaulted cellar of good
workmanship was found under the premises of the Old Bank, on the other side of
Com street. See Proceedings Archaeological Inst.: Bristol volume, 1851, and
Mr. Latimer's ** Annals of Bristol," pp. 824 and 362.— Ed.
5 Dallaway. Note pp. 66, 66.
174 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
building in towns to erect stone party walls three feet thick
to the level of the top of the ground floor. This arrangement
was carried out in the old houses in Peter street, opposite the
church, now mostly pulled down.
We still have some few old houses left in St. Mary-le-Port
street, enough to give us an idea of its former most picturesque
effect; but most of the old Jacobean gabled fronts have been
pulled down from the streets of old Bristol, leaving but a few
fragments of old wood and plaster work at the back, where they
are not often seen. After all, we can hardly regret these
picturesque but dirty old houses being replaced by modem ones
with ample light and air, and decent drainage, matters respecting
which the builders of these old half timbered houses did not
much trouble themselves.
I give a sketch (PI. xviii., fig. 2) of the wooden corner-post
opposite the church in Peter street, supporting a corner of an
old house. Also (PI. xviii., fig. 8) of one of the Norman pillars
in the cellar of a warehouse in Nelson street, to which access
was probably obtained in former times from the river Froom,
now arched over and formed into Rupert street. These pillars
were recently inspected with the other remains of Norman
Bristol, by some of the members of the Club, and some doubt was
expressed as to whether they occupy their original position, or
have been removed from some ancient building in the
neighbourhood.
Cheddar Church, Somersetshire. 175
Ciietitiar C^urct), domersetsttr^*
Bt thb Rbv. JOHN COLEMAN, M.A., Vicar.
iJtMd Ocioher 4ih, 1887.)
The site of the parish church of St. Andrew at Cheddar is
certainly one of very great antiquity, and probably the scene of
Pagan worship. A coin of the Emperor Domitian was recently
dug up in the graveyard, as well as remains of Boman pottery.
The earliest documentary evidence of the existence of a church
here is to be found in the Wells Cathedral Liber AUms, I. folio
106, and is as follows : — " praesentatus fuit
ad ecclm de Ceddre-hole Wills Giffard fil Gilleb, regis marescal,
qui erat admissus per Godefr, Epm. Bathon." Godfrey was
Bishop of Bath A.D. 1128 — 1185. On the same folio is a
transcript of the donation of the Church to the prior and convent
of S. Mary at Bradenstoke. It runs thus : — " Inscriptum cartsB
de donasione ecclesiaB de Ceddre-hole. Johannes regis marescallus
omnibus fidelibus sanctsB ecclesisB salutem ! Notum facio vobis
quod ego dedi et concessi in perpetuam eleemosynam eccles.sanctsB
MarisB de Bradenstok et Ganonices ibidem Domino servientibus
ecclesiam de Ceddre pro salute animsB mese et patrio mei
et fratrum meorum et parentum meorum ibidem quiescentum
quam ecclesiam autem dedi iis cum omnibus pertinentiis suis
libere et quiete possidendam et ut donatio ista firma sit im-
positum sigillo meo et praBsenti carta eis confirmavi — Hiis
testibus," &c., &c.
Another Chapter document (folio 27) refers to the grant, by the
prior and convent of Bradenstoke, of the church and all rights
in it to the Dean of Wells, in the time of Bishop Beginald
Fitzjocelin (A.D. 1174 — 1191), which grant Bishop Jocelin Trot-
man confirmed to the Chapter A.D 1240.
176 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Of this early church few traces remain ; but it would seem that
the materials of the more ancient fabric were utihsed in the
construction of the present edifice, which is a combination of
18th, 14th, and 16th century work. Portions of the plinth of
the north and south aisles of the nave are of an earlier date than
the remainder ; and what might be fragments of Boman brick-
work, appearing here and there in the masonry of the tower, are
probably pieces of the encaustic tiling of the floors of the first
church.
A fine double piscina in the south wall of the sacrarium, of
13th century date, and the character of the masonry, show that
the chancel is the earliest part of the building as it stands. A
document quoted by Mr. Wadley in Bristol Wills points to the
latter half of the 14th century,^ as the date when one at least of
the side chapels was erected. William de Gheddre the elder, of
Bristol, desires in his will (November 21, 1382) to be buried in
the chapel of the Blessed Mary, in the parish church of Cheddar ;
and Bobert Gheddre, of Bristol (March 21, 1382), makes the
same request, adding, as to the chapel, '' de novo foindata,'*
With this agrees the Wells Chapter record (folio 283) of a
Chantry established in the parish church of Gheddre of the
annual value of 10 marcs, on behalf of our present King
Edward, and the benefit of his soul after his death. Qy. 1375 — 77.
It has been reasonably conjectured that the family of the
Chedders, who were possessed of great wealth, were promoters of
the building of the church, as it now stands ; the tomb with the
brass effigy of (as is supposed) Sir Thomas de Chedder* in
armour, standing on a lion, on the north side of the chancel,
and that of the Lady Isabella beneath, together with the frequent
occurrence of the Chedder arms, lead to this conclusion. Mr.
Freeman has characterised the clerestory windows as " a sort of
transition between the decorated and perpendicular styles," and
the perpendicular work in other parts of the church as ** singu-
larly good," and " the parapets and windows as some of the best
work in the County."* The tower is very similar in design to
» In the Wells Chapter records, Liber Albusfol. 163, in dors.^ " Ceddre and its
chapels " are named in a confirmation by the Bishop, A.D. 1321. — ^Ed.
" A drawing of this brass is given in this volume, ante p. 39, in illustration
of Colonel Bramble's paper on Medisval Armour.
3 Somerset Archaeol. Soc. Proceedings ix. p. 41.
Cheddar Church, Somersetshire. 177
the towers at Banwell and Winscombe, and possesses sculptured
figures in the west front of the Angel Gabriel and the Blessed
Virgin. An interesting feature is the Chantry chapel, added,
at a late date, at the east end of the south porch, in which are
two graceful windows set under a square head, pierced so as to
constitute one square headed window. A renovated figure of
S. Erasmus or S. Elmo, remains in this chapel. Altars of
S. Erasmus existed in the church of S. Cuthbert, Wells, and in
the parish church of Nettlecombe, Somerset. All the ancient
glass that was found when the church was largely repaired in
1873 was placed here with yery good effect. According to Bishop
Clifford two of the figures represented are St. Barbara and
St. Catherine.
The following notes relating to Cheddar are from " Bishop
Drokbnsford's Register " (1309 — 1329). Somerset Record Soc,
1887. Edited by Bishop Hobhouse.
** November 30th, 1317. Robert Cotes, deacon, was instituted
vicar of Cheddar. Patrons, the Dean and Chapter of Wells.
The Dean to induct." {Drok. fol. 157b.)
" 4 KaL, October, 1321. Present in Street chapel : — The Bishop,
Dean, and Archdeacon of Wells, the Chancellor, Treasurer, and
eight other Canons." Among the subjects of their enquiries as
recorded in Drokensford's register was : —
(5,) " Touching St. Columban's chapel in Cheddar, respecting
which, ' inquiry shall be made and precedent shall rule ;' and
(7,) " Touching the impounding of the Dean's cattle in Cheddar
moor." (Drok. fol. 22a).
October 7th, 1321. The Bishop commissions two Canons
and two of his clerks to inquire, ** whether, when Cheddar
belonged to the King, the chapel of St. Columban* was a Royal
Free Chapel." (Drok. fol. 178a.)
* The site of St. Columban's Chapel is now unknown. — Ed.
178 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Sl^elimore.
Bt Li«ut.-Col. J. R. BRAMBLE, F.S.A., V.P.
(i^tfoi/ OcU^er Srd, 1887).
The church of Wedmore, dedicated to St. Mary the Virgin, is o
large size, and occupies a somewhat imposing position on liigh
ground, in the small town which forms the centre or nucleus of
the parish — the largest in the diocese. Hence it affords a
striking appearance ; but it can hardly be said to compare
favourably with many other of the principal churches of
Somerset. The absence of a clerestory, of a " west front," the
'' batter," or diminishing size of the tower towards its summit,
and the inferior character of its parapet, all tend to this result
But in estimating the appearance of the building it must be
taken into consideration that it formerly possessed a spire. This
would not only have given the requisite height to the composition,
but would have removed the appearance of awkwardness incident
to the *^ batter" of the tower, giving a more harmonious appear-
ance to the entire structure. Unfortunately, under an apprehen-
sion of danger, the spire was taken down in the early part of the
present century and has not been replaced.
The general character of the masonry in the later work is
inferior, especially in the eastern portion, where the absence of a
" ground- table " is noticeable.
There is every probability that a church stood here from very
early times. Gollinson informs us^ that it appears in the annals
of Glastonbury^ that the " island of Wedmore," containing 70
hides, belonged to that monastery by the gift of St. Wilfrid.
■ Collinson. Hist. Som. 1. 189. ^ Johaiinis Glastoniensis Hist. 93.
Church of St. Mary the Virgin, IVedmore. 179
Subsequently, King Alfred is found in possession, and then King
Harold gave it to 6iso, Bishop of Wells, and in Doomsday it is
certified to be in the possession of that Bishop, and that he held
it in the time of King Edward. From its situation and owner-
ship it is very unlikely, therefore, that the parish should have
been left for some centuries without any ecclesiastical centre;
and by the extracts from the Report on the Wells charters
annexed to this paper, it will be seen that the *' church of
Wedmore " is mentioned in a charter of 1186.
But unless a small window in the west wall of the south
transept, afterwards described, is the last relic of an early church,
there is nothing architectural in the present building of earlier
date than the beginning of the 18th century. To this date may
be assigned the lower portion of the tower and the western half
of the chancel, but with trifling exceptions these form the only
parts which are of earlier than perpendicular date.
The church, as it now stands, consists of a long chancel, with
north and south chapels extending about one half its length, a
central tower, north and south transepts, nave (without
clerestory), north and south aisles, a fine tower-porch on the
south side of the nave, and a large chapel filling in the space
between the porch and transept.
With the exception of the chancel the whole of the edifice,
including the tower, is surmounted by a parapet of trefoil-
headed panels. In the case of the tower only, the panels are
pierced, but the openings are so narrow that from most points of
view they are invisible, and the parapet appears solid, and has a
heavy eflfect, very different from the beautiful trefoiled, pierced
parapets so characteristic of Somersetshire work.
The tower has two stages above the roof. The lower has a
single, two-light window in each face, and in the upper part of the
south side a clock has been fixed. The upper, or bell stage, is of
richer character generally, and has three two-light windows in
each face, all but the centre one of each face being simply panelled
and not pierced.
No consecration crosses were found either within or without
the building on the occasion of our visit, but it is understood that
one has been deciphered on the south wall between the chancel
and porch.
The porch and chapel project southward considerably beyond
i8o Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the transept, and communicate by a small door between two
windows, each of two trefoiled lights under segmental arches.
Above is an equilateral window of two trefoiled lights.
The 13th century church was apparently cruciform, probably
following the plan, if not standing on the foundations, of the
earlier church. The tower stands on four low, massive lantern
arches of Early English date. They are of square section, with a
simple chamfered edge. The north and south arches, however,
differ in detail, and from appearances disclosed at the recent
restoration, it would seem that the south transept was added at a
somewhat later date. The southern arch is furnished on its
north side wdth a hood moulding with head terminations, and
has a stop-chamfer at its base only. The northern arch has no
hood moulding, but a stop-chamfer at capital as well as at base.
The groining of fan-tracery is much later, of 15th century
date. Eastward, the chancel probably extended little more than
half the present length. Late 15th century arches have been
inserted opening up the side chapels, but in the walls over each
of these arches may be seen the remains of a group of three
plain lancet windows.
It will be observed, however, from the weather moulding on the
chancel arch, that these windows could not have formed part of
the original chancel, which must havje been too low to include
them. The present roof also cuts off the upper portions, but
from the outside it will be seen that at some intermediate date
there has been a roof more lofty than the present, which has
run into the windows of the belfry stage of the tower.
At the east end of the south chapel there is a beautiful two-
light early decorated (c. 1800) window, with a spherical triangle
in the head, and cinquefoiled rear-arch, which not improbably at
one time occupied a position at the east end of the chancel. It
appears to be the only work in the decorated style now in the
building, and is much earlier in date than the chapel in which it
is now inserted.
Over the north side of the arch, between the south transept
and aisle, will be found a short internally splayed semi-circular
headed niche (like a blocked up window), closely resembling a
rude window in Caversfield church, Bucks.,' which is considered
to be of Saxon date. A close examination of this niche could
3 Figured in Bloxam's Principles of Gothic Architecture, 11th Ed. vol. 1, p. 56,
Church of St. Mary the Virgin, IVedmore. i8i
not be made when the church was visited, but it has all the
appearance of considerable antiquity.
The existing chancel is lighted by an east window of five, and
north and south windows of four lights each — all of large size and
of plain, late perpendicular design. Under the south window is a
stone bench, without divisions, under a very depressed arch, and
eastward of the bench, or sedilia, a piscina in a cinquefoiled
recess. The basin is quatrefoiled (set square) , and at the back is
a narrow shelf, 8^ inches, with free ends. Close to the eastern
respond of the arch opening into the north chapel, is a 15th
century bracket, probably intended to support a lamp. The
design is a head, over, rather than on, which is a pointed
crown ; the long face and peculiar smile are of semi-grotesque
character.
The weather moulding on the tower, which shows the original
pitch of the Early English roof to have been lower and more
acute than that of the present, has already been referred to.
In the extreme west end of the north wall of the chancel —
west of the arch opening into the north chapel — is a short stair-
case. This commences by a doorway (with marks of hinges) in
the north chapel, about 5 feet from the ground. There are then
4 steps in the thickness of the wall, and the southern aperture
skews slightly eastward. Above this doorway, but close to the
tower, is a square-headed loop, about 5 feet by 1 foot This
loop is now built up.
On a level with the south opening of the stair, about 6 feet
6 inches from the ground level, there are the marks where a
beam was inserted in the eastern arch of the tower. There are
the evident remains of the rood-loft in the usual position, west
of the tower, with the staircase leading to it in the north-west
angle, and the existence of two lofts is very unusual. Still it
is difficult to suggest any other explanation. The erection,
whatever it was, must have been coeval with the highest of the
three roofs, as the present one cuts the loop, and the original line
runs through the doorway at about one half its height.
At the Lampeter Meeting of the Cambrian ArchsBological
Association in 1878, the Bishop of St. David's (the well-known
ArchflBologist, Dr. Basil Jones,) referred to Llangeitho church in
Cardiganshire (figured in Meyrick*s History of Cardiganshire),
and said, " The representation depicts two screens across the
1 82 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
church. I know of no similar example except in the Cathedral
church of this diocese (St. David's)."* In the ground plan of
St. David's Cathedral it will be found that the principal screen is
placed a few feet westward of the central tower at the entrance of
the ritual choir, but that a few feet eastward of such tower there
is a second screen.^ The screen at Llangeitho has been destroyed.*^
In his description of that chmxh, Meyrick says, " There is a
double screen to separate the chancel from the body of the
church which exhibits a curious specimen of laborious, but
elegant Gothic workmanship. Each part of the screen consists
of three ornamental arches, in the spandrils of which birds and
beasts are grotesquely introduced."^
From the plate which accompanies the description, the latter
would appear to be applicable, to a great extent, to the western
screen only. The side bays in this are each filled in to a height
of about 4 feet, above which are 4 septfoiled arches ; the
centre bay remaining open. The eastern screen, which occupies
a position about half way between the western and the east
wall of the chancel, is of much plainer character, apparently
quite destitute of carving. It is, in fact, little more than a loft,
with coved front, standing upon two square posts, forming the
supports for three very depressed flat sided arches. The copper
plates of this date are very deficient in architectural accuracy,
but so far as can be judged from this one, the eastern screen is
some century or more later than the other. There is no chancel
arch.
It is singular that a similar arrangement of screens has
apparently existed at Axbridge — like Wedmore, a cruciform church
— about five miles distant, but with the exceptions mentioned, the
writer is not aware of any other instance, and would be glad to be
informed of any similar cases which may be noticed, particularly
in Somersetshire or other West of England churches. The
arrangement would probably be confined to those of cruciform
plan. No mention of any second screen is made in YioUet
le Due, Bloxam, Parker, or other numerous works on gothic
architecture which have been consulted ; or, with the exception
above given, in the proceedings of the principal Societies.
The north and south chapels are of 15th century date, but
* Arch. Gamb., 4 Series, vol. ix., p. 334. s Hoare's Giraldus, vol. ii., p. 33.
*Proc. Soc. Antiq., xii, 38. 7Meyrick'8 " Cardiganshire," p. 276.
Church of St. Mary the Virgin, IVedmore. 183
differ in detail, as do the low, wide, depressed arches opening to
them from the chancel, and those communicating with the
transepts. The north chapel has a fine panelled roof in which are
paintings of angels, lines from the Te Deum, etc. This chapel
is now lighted by a square-headed window of one quatre-foiled
light on the east, and a four centred window of four trefoiled
lights on the north. Under the latter window is a stone slab,
6 feet 6 inches by 8 feet 2 inches, standing on modern supports.
It may be an altar slab, but has been used as a tomb-stone,
and has a marginal inscription to Robert Sherwell, Gent., of
Blackford, in Wedmore Parish. None of the five crosses usual
on an altar stone can be detected. At the south end of the east
wall is a piscina under a trefoiled arch. The basin takes the
form of five sides of an octagon, with the north and south sides
prolonged, and there are four drain holes covered by a "four
leaved flower " charged with a tudor rose. Above is a shallow
shelf with engaged ends.
The chapel, south of the chancel, is lighted on the east by the
beautiful early decorated window previously described ; on the
south, by a square-headed window of four cinquefoiled lights
surmounted by a segmental arch. In the east corner of this
window a small detached arch covers a piscina with cinquefoiled
basin, but without shelf. The mouldings of the jamb of window
are the double ogee. Under the east window is a very fine stone
altar slab, 7 feet 6 inches by 2 feet II inches, and 7^ inches
thick, the lower edge moulded. Four of the crosses are plainly
visible. This stone was no doubt the former High Altar. It was
found at the time of the recent restoration, buried under the
stone on which the Communion table stood. North of the Altar
is a small doorway.
The transepts appear to have been divided both from the
chapels and aisles by parclose screens. In the tower respond, at
the west entrance of the south transept, outside the screen, there
is a niche for a saint, or, possibly, a lamp, but it is much defaced.
There are no signs of an altar in either transept.
The nave and aisles, which are of considerable length and
width, are separated by arcades of five bays. The pillars are
lofty and well proportioned, but the bases have a somewhat
clumsy effect. The caps are circular and floriated — ^a not
unusual feature in Somersetshire work of the 15th century. The
1 84 Clifton Antiquarian Club^
section of the shafts is very ordinary perpendicular, a sqaare with
the angles cut into a wide shallow cavetto, and three-quarter
shafts attached to the fiat faces. On the north sides of the first
and second piers in the north arcade are marks probably of par-
close screens, as if the two eastern bays of the north aisle had been
enclosed as chapels. This arrangement was very frequent in
England, and is still constantly found in Continental churches.
There are doorways in the north and south aisles opposite each
other, that on the north having a window over. There are three
other windows in this aisle, one east and two west of the doorway,
one at the west end of each of the nave and aisles, and two in the
south aisle west of the porch. They have each four trefoiled
lights, and the tracery is of plain, late perpendicular, character.
The porch is exceptionally lofty, being formed of three stories —
in fact, a low tower. The vicar states that, as far as living
memory goes, there were always two rooms over the porch, but
the writer is disposed to think that at one time it was open to
what is now the second fioor, in the same manner as at Wraxall,
in the same county, and that over the church door was one of
the curious '' porch galleries," almost peculiar to this district,
the use of which has never been fully explained. The niche now
in the interior of the church over the south door, until the recent
restoration, occupied a similar position outside, and would have
stood over this gallery. There is a turret stair in the north-west
corner, leading to the rooms above. Near the top of this stair is a
loop in the aisle wall, deeply splayed on the south (or out) side,
affording a view of the interior of the church in the direction of
the High Altar, but not commanding it. This was probably the
room of a sacristan or other custodian of the church, or, possibly, of
a priest or anchorite. There is now no stoup or benetura in or near
the porch, but until the restoration there was one of inferior
workmanship on the right of, and close to the inner door.
The interior doorway is of fine Early English work of two orders,
with nook shafts of blue lias with floriated caps. The shafts are
new. The door is furnished with hinges and ornamental bars of
wrought iron, with curved heads of pecuUar design, the free ends
of every bar being divided into five or more portions, which are
arranged in as many curls. In square-headed nails it bears the
date 1677, with JJ. c w below it.
On the north side are the door and windows of the south-west
Church of St. Mary the Virgin, IVedmore. 185
chapel previously alluded to. This chapel is open to the church
by two arches, supported in the middle by a quasi pillar composed
of a piece of wall with moulded ends, the responds being of the same
character. It is lighted by two very large Perpendicular windows of
four trefoiled lights each, which occupy, practically, the whole of
the south wall. Below the windows is a stone bench. In the
south end of the east wall is a piscina under trefoiled arch. The
basin (like that in the north chapel) takes the form of five sides
of an octagon. In the centre is a defaced boss or flower. No
shelf. The roof is panelled and of good design.
Close to this chapel, and to the porch, is the font. It is of
octagonal form, and, not improbably, the bowl, which is very large,
and has been extensively repaired, is that of the original 15th
century church. The basin is much larger than is usual in per-
pendicular work, and it may well have been a square font with
the angles cut off to form an octagon, and the lower edge moulded.
At Chelvey, in this County, a square, late Norman font has been
converted into an octagon, but there the Norman mouldings
remain. The bowl stands on an octagonal shaft of panelled work,
similar to the parapet of the church. There is a modern octagonal
step and a standing-place for the minister.
The roof of the nave has been extensively restored, but its
principal features are old. It has moulded beams, with king and
queen posts, and spandrels, wall beams resting on corbels carved
with semi-grotesque heads, and cornice braces. The construction
is not comformable to the arcade below it, and conveys the idea of
a roof not designed for the present building.
The pulpit is of good Jacobean design. In the upper divisions
are blank panels with borders of grapes, vine leaves, &c., while
in the panels below appear the thistle, fleur de lis, and groups of
flowers conventionally treated. There was formerly a canopy or
sounding board above, and a reading desk, of similar date (looking
westward), below it. Behind the pulpit, in the north transept, is
the entrance to the rood loft, long since destroyed.
At the restoration of the church in 1881, there was found under
the plaster on the wall at the back of the pulpit, a painting of St.
Christopher, depicted, as usual, as a giant carrying the child
Christ across a river. It is probably coeval with the nave, but
has evidently been retouched, and, to a great extent, repainted
more than once. The saint is represented in a tunic and cope-
2
1 86 Clifton Antiquarian Club,
like upper garment, of. more ample form than is customary, and
amongst the fishes below, a mermaid, holding a mirror, is disport*
ing herself. On the shoulder of the infant Christ appears the
dove, the representative of the Third Person of the Trinity. The
figure portrayed above, holding up his hand in the attitude of
blessing, must be intended for God the Father, although, singu-
larly, he is drawn as a young man, with cross-staff, and pennon in
the left hand. Taken alone this would doubtless be attributed to
Our Saviour.' The fisherman seated on the bank, and the
two curious ancient, two-masted ships, with high poop and
forecastle, and castles in the tops, also the hermit with his lantern,
should also be noticed.
Monuments. — CoUinson gives an account of, and copies of the
inscriptions from a large number of monuments, but there are
none of any great antiquity, and few of more than purely local
interest.
The most ancient appeal's to be a stone coffin slab, now level
with the floor of the chancel, which has been twice appropriated.
In the part covering the head is the matrix of a brass. It
formerly contained a small demi-figure of a priest with an in-
scription and an oblong plate beneath. From the outline this may
have been of the latter half of the 15th century. Below this
matrix the stone has been cut in two and probably turned over,
and there now appears an inscription to the memory of James
Downton, a former vicar.
At the east end of the south east chapel, under the stone altar,
is lying a coffin-shaped pennant slab, which was found buried in
the south-west chapel. It is 27 inches long, 13 inches broad at the
head, and 9^ inches at the foot, and the edge, except at the head,
has a plain chamfer. On the slab, in relief, is a cross with fleurs
de lis at the terminations, and above the cross is the head of a
girl with long flowing hair, bound with a fillet. There is no date
or inscription, but the form of the cross indicates the 15th
century ; and the flowing hair and fillet that the lady represented
was unmarried.® The face and a portion of the cross have scaled
off, but the pieces are preserved, and it is understood to be the
vicar's intention to have them carefully cemented in their proper
' A good lithograph of this painting is given by the vicar in hia " Wedmore
Chronicle," vol. i., p. 34.
^ Haines' Manual of Hon. Brasses, part 1., ccxiii.
Church of St. Mary the Virgin, iVedinore. 187
place. This slab is a very interesting character, and of an
unusual type in this district. It is worthy of careful
preservation.
In the vicarage garden are portions of two sepulchral slabs
which formed part of the filling in of the window east of the north
chapel, recently re- opened. They have evidently formed part of
one or more altar slabs, the distinctive crosses being visible.
They have both portions of marginal inscriptions, now almost
illegible, and one has a portion of a Latin cross with its
Calvary.
At the east end of the north chapel there are the remains of a
monument, which was formerly of very much larger size and
stood at the east sidie of the north transept. On it . are brass
plates, the inscriptions on which are of some interest, and
although they are given in CoUinson it is worth while to repeat
them here. On a third plate is the efllgj" of George Hodges
(c. 1680), which should be noticed as being probably the latest
instance of military costume on any brass in England. All
armour, except the gorget still worn by officers in the French
army, has disappeared ; and the buff coat and modern sword hilt
of the Caroline period will be noticed.®
" Sacred to the memory of Captain Thomas Hodges, of the
County of Somerset, esq., who at the siege of Antwerp, aboute
1583, with unconquered courage wonne two ensigns from the
enemy, where receiving his last wound, he gave three legacies :
his soule to his Lord Jesus, his body to be lodged in Flemish
earth, his heart to be sent to his dear wife in England.
Here lies his wounded heart, for whome
One kingdom was too small a roome :
Two kingdoms therefore have thought good to part
So stout a body and so brave a heart."
** The effigies of George Hodges, esq., who lived many
years at this place, in a pious and religious maimer, whose
better part was wrapt into the best place, and his mortal
lyeth heere interred in the sepulchre of his grandfather and
father."
There are eight bells. The inscriptions and other particulars,
as given below, are extracted, as to the first and second, from " The
9 This effigy is figured at Page 39 as an illustration to Col. Bramble's
paper on Mcdisoval Armour.
8
1 4
8
2 11
Diameter.
37 in.
ft
t>
f «
1 88 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Wedmore Chronicle," as to the remainder, from EUacombe's
Church Bells of Somerset.
Weigbt
cwt. qn. lbs.
1 J. TAYLOR & Co., BELL FOUNDERS. LOUGHBOROUGH,
A oox •■ •■ •• •• «• ••
2 As 1 with addition of PRESENTED BY J. F. BAILEY, 1881
3 Mr. IOHN. tucker. Mr. WILLIAM. BROWN. CHURCH-
WARDENS.
MY. TREBLE. VOICE. MAKES. HEARTS. REIOICE.
4 O. LORD. HOWE. GLORIOUS. ARE. THY. WORKS. 1705 . . 39
(Coins impressed Chas. II). BILBIE. CAST. ME.
5 Mr. IOHN. TUCKER. Mr. WM. BROWN. CHURCH-
WARDENS. 1772 .. ... .. .. 41i
6 B. BILBIE. CAST. ME. 1705. GEORGE. STONE. GABRIEL.
IVYLEAFE .. .. .. .. .. 45J
7 IOHN. BARROW. GEORGE. GREEN. CHURCHWARDENS.
EDWAD. EDWARDS. lAMES. BILBIE. CHEWSTOKE.
FECIT. 1801 .. .. .. .. .. 50i
8 I. TO. THE. CHURCH. THE. LIVING. CALL. AND. TO. THE.
GRAVE. DOTH. SUMMONS. ALL. WM. BILBIE. FECIT.
PETER. EVENS. & GEORGE. VOWLES. CHURCH-
WARDENS. 1775. WM. BILBIE. FECIT. .. .. 57
D
In the Register of Bishop John de Drokensford (vol. 1 of the
Somerset Record Society) the following entries with respect to
Wedmore occur.
Fol. 271a. : — Bp. to Sub-dean. The Dean's estate at Zelemore,
in Wedmore, having been damaged, buildings pulled down, and
goods taken in open day, publish a monition to the effect that
this contempt of ecclesiastical rights is mortal sin incurring
excommunication. There are persons unknown deceiving our
simple peasants. When names are known use our power for
correction. 10 Kal. Nov. 1826.
Fol. 271b (latter portion Fol. 246a by misplacement) Bp.
to Sub-dean. Your certificate shews that two servants of
Abbot Adam, of Glastonbury, and two monks, entered in
open day on Dean's land at Zelemore, destroyed cottages and
seized eflfects, thereby the Abbot and four others have incurred
Excomm. ; cite them to show cause " quare non " and if
contumacious, pronounce sentence in this cause, which is pro-
moted both " ex-officio " and also " ad instantiam Decani."
Banwell 8 Id. Nov. 1326.
Bp. to Vic. of Cheddar and two Cathedral Vicars. Recital of
above proceedings, and a Commission to cite Abbot and four
Church of St. Mary the Virgin, IVedmore. 189
accomplices to Wells Consistory, at Dean's suit, next law day
after St. Edm, to answer ** quare non." Wells same day.
(The result does not appear).
In the Rejyort on the Manuscripts of Wells Cathedral, edited by
' the Rev. J. A. Bennett, F.S.A., for the Historical Manuscripts
Commission, will be found numerous references to the church
and parish of Wedmore. The following are extracts, in some
cases slightly epitomised.
In the Lib. Alb. I fol. 12. " Godefrid de Wedmore " is one of
the attesting w^itnesses to a grant of land at North Curri to St.
Andrew and the church at Wells.
3rd year from translation of St. Thomas Martyr.
** Same, fol. 18. In the Charter of Bishop Robert de ordinatione
prebendarum. We therefore make of Wedmoreland six prebends
and the Deanery, and we assign the church, &c., of Wedmore
to the Sub-dean." A. D. 1136.
,, fol. 34. Walt, de Wedmore is an attesting witness to the
grant of certain houses to be a canonical house. A. D. 1235.
,, fol. 51. By Charter of Bp. Josceline, the Rectory of
Merk is, with the consent of the Rector and Chapter, annexed to
the Dean's Prebend of Wedmore.
„ fol. 58. In Charter of Hen. I to Godfrey, Bp. of Bath,
*' Merk in Wedmore is of the Bishop's demesne."
Hen. II to Ivo the Dean of free
warren in Wedmore,
M. Regina addressed to W. de
Moiun Vicecomes, &c. At her request Osbert Eps. Essecestrensis
has granted to Bishop Giso the church of Wedmore, to which he
has often laid claim.
Order made by Bishop Josceline for the good of the church
which he loves so well.
The church of Wedmore which had belonged to the Sub-deanery
to become a Prebend of the Deanery and to pay to a Vicar in the
church of Wells four marks a year. Pontif . anno 4th
(in exchange for Woky).
" Same, fol. 58 in dors. Charter of Bp. Josceline with consent
of Dean and Chapter. The revenues of vacant prebends except
(Note.) — The Bishop takes those of the Deanery, including Wedmore, and of
other offices.
190 Clifton Antiquarian Club,
that of Wedmore to belong to the Chapter. Pontificat anno 8th.
„ fol. 59. Bobert Malherbe, son of Henry de Mudesleg,
quit claims to Peter the Dean and successors a half virgate in
Wedmore, in Bemestone Hundred.
„ fol. 119 in dors. Bad. de Windelzore, Canon and Preb.
inducted to Wedmore 4th portion. 1818.
,, fol. 148. Prebends of Wedmore, 4th and 2nd absent
from general convocation of church at Wells, '* qui fuerunt extra
regnum."
„ fol. 159 in dors. Insp. and Conf. by Chapter of a grant
made by the Dean J. de Godelee of lands in Wedmore, &c. Many
details of lands and names of persons. 1822.
„ fol. 171 in dors. Conf. of Grant of lands in Wedmore by
the Dean. Names of persons and places. 1825.
,, fol. 178 in dors. Insp. by D. and C. of a final concord
between Bp. Walter and Dean Godelee, with regard to certain
rights in Wedmore, Blakeford and Baggeley.
,, fol. 183. D. and C. appoint John Hilebond receiver of
gifts for Cathedral fabric. Stephen de Wedmore one of sureties.
1829.
„ fol. 184 in dors. Agreement under which Dean might
enclose 600 acres in Wedmore Moor. 1380.
„ fol. 195 in dors. The homage of Wedmore and Modeslee
(Mudgley) prove that John de Aschebury, proctor for Dean R de
Bury, received from the Exs. of John de Godelee (late Dean),
" nomine implementi," 24 oxen for 3 carrucse, each valued at
18s. 4d. ; also as implements for the church land, 2 oxen, worth
26s. 8d. ; 2 afl&ri worth 20b. One bull worth 12s., one cow lOs.,
one boar 8s. 4d., one sow 2s. Summa i£20 14s. Od.
Also for dilapidations in the buildings, £15s. 10s.
Also one plough bound with iron, with a hempen rope ; one
carruca bound with iron, another with all its belongings, with
8 men and 2 iron chains of the length sufficient for 8 oxen. Two
tables and tressells in the halL
A similar list for Modeslee.
„ fol. 220. Val. of Prebends to fix minimum price at
which Escheator might sell proceeds of benefices during the first
year after death of Canon. Wedmore jB40.
„ fol. 250. Presentation to the Vicarage of Wedmore of
John Browning by Dean S. Pympel, Dec. 15th, 1361,
Church of St. Mary the Virgin, IVedmore. 191
I Ah, Albus III. fol. 327 in dors. Grant by Nich. Carent Dean
of reversion of Ten. and Lands in Wedmore, and confirm,
by Chapter. 1468.
„ fol. 449 in dors. Mark annexed to Preb. of
Wedmore.
Large Vol. marked D fol. 44. Appmt. by Thos. Crumwell,
miles dominas Crumwell deeanus with consent of C. of W.
Butler to be bailiff of Bempston Hundred ; to have custody of
park at Wedmore and also woods of the Hundred.
,, fol. 121 in dors. Warrant by Dean fitz William
for Thomas Clerke armiger, to have every year ** unam damam " in
summer, and "unam damam" in winter from the park at
Wedmore. June 1st. 35 Hen. VIII.
Vol. E a continuation of Vol. D as far as A.D. 1565,
fol. 44.
Indenture between the D. of Somerset and the Bp. by which
the Bp. sells to the D. the palace at Wells, manors of Wells,
Westbury, the Hundred of Wells, park at Westbury and all
manner of wild beasts in it with appurts.
In consideration D. pays Bp. i*400 and grants, his mansion
commonly called the Dean's House of Wells, manor,' advowson
and hundred of West Coker, boroughs of Stogursey and Welling-
ton, certain lands worth .i60 2s. Hid. a year, park of Wedmore
and the church and chapel, and vicarage of Mark, also annuity of
£VJ from M. of Glastonbury. 10 Dec. 4 Edw. VI.
Confirmed by D. and C. Dec. 29th, 1550.
The are other entries not set out in the printed report.
In a Vol. of Chapter AcU. 1635—1644.
P. 97, Mr. Humphrey Sydenhan, installed as Preb. of Wed-
more III. June 23, 1643.
Page 272 of the Eeport is set out ; —
A surrender by Wm. Fitzwilliam, Dean of Wells, to Edw. VI.
of the office of Dean and certain lands and manors including
Wedmore. Mar. 13th. 1 Edw. VI.
P. 281 under the head of Escheatory Accounts ; —
In the Roll for 1372. Received from the Prebend of Wedmore
II. vacant by the death of Roger Wyle, 41.
In the same Roll under the head of debts due ; —
40 1. from the Prebend of Wedmore, at the first vacancy caused
by the death of John Carleton, anno 60^
192 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Certain sums axe distributed ; — To the Prebend of Wedmore
n. 41.
In the Fabrick Roll for the year 1457 (p. 290), appears : —
For reading the Epistle when certain Stalls were vacant ; —
Wedmore II., for two terms, 20d.; Wedmore III. and IV., for three
terms, 2s. 6d. each.
Amongst the miscellaneous Charters, Nos. 811 — ^814., p. 802,
about Bents — " at la Thele in Wedmore."
(The writer desires to acknowledge the courteous and valuable assistance in the
preparation of the foregoing paper, which he has received from the the Vicar, the
Bev. Sydenham H. A. Hervey, and from the Editor).
Ancient Bristol Documents. 193
indent Bristol documents
NOS. VI. AND VII.
VI.— Keinilattons! of tfte l^esitrp of ^t Cf)omad,
in 1563.
CSomnnaciTBD bt tek Bev. C. 8. TAYLOR, M.A., Vicab.
VII.— Beffulationd oC x\it ^(dtrp of ^t* J^tepb^n.
m 1524.
Communicated by Alderman F. F. FOX.
(Read November 24th, 1887.)
[It is only necessary to say as an introduction to these documents, that
the paper on the Regulations of St. Thomas' Vestry was read at a meeting of the
Club held on November 24th, 18S7, to which meeting Mr. F. F. Fox very kindly
sent a copy of the Regulations of St. Stephen's Vestry, which were also read.
Mr. Fox also permitted me to add the notes on the St. Stephen's document which
follow it, in order that the relation between the two sets of rules and their bearing
on the early history of the Vestries of the City churches might be made more
apparent. C. S. T.]
No. VL
CoNSTiTTJTiONS made and ordained by the proctors and major sort
of the parishioners of St. Thomas within Bristowe, and fore
proctors of the same parish church concluded at a Vestry there
holden within the same parish church the xxth day of January,
Anno Dm. 1562, to be observed and obeyed as a Law of all those
that from henceforth shall be chosen proctors of the said parish
church hereafter for ever by the ordinance of these men whose
names be here underwritten.
First it is ordained that and if any of the ancient proctors
being admonished of the proctors for the time being to appear in
the Vestry and they obstinately refuse the same without a lawful
cause shall forfeit unto the church for every such default
money — xiid ,
194 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Secondly it is ordained that the new proctors be chosen every
year upon the Sunday before St. James' day and publication
thereof to be made by the curate the same day unto the
parishioners and the same ordinance to have a continuance
for ever.
Thirdly it is ordained that the old proctors shall not only
deliver unto the new proctors within xiiii days after they be
chosen all the keys appertaining unto the proctors, and also such
goods of the church as they have charge of by inventory, but also
four pounds ten shillings which goeth from proctors to proctors.
And for non-doing the same the old proctors shall forfeit unto
the church every of them five shillings except they can shew
reasonable cause at the next Vestry, and by the same Vestry
be eased of their fine.
Fourthly, it is ordained that the old proctors shall not only
bring in their account unto the parishioners in writing erased (at
or of this side the end of nine months) inserted (the Monday next
after St. Andrew's day) after they be discharged of their office.
But also shall presently make payment of all such sums of money
as they shall be found indebted upon the foot of their account,
which moneys shall be forthwith transported by the proctors for
the time being and the assistance of the parish into the treasure
coflfer, there to remain for the necessities of the church and
reparations of the lands. Which coffer hath iii locks, and three
keys, of the which iii keys, the one remaineth with the proctors
for the time being, and the other two in the hands of two of the
Ancientest of the parish. And for not bringing in their aforesaid
account and moneys the said old proctors shall forfeit unto the
church every of them xxs.
And further it is allowed that the proctors at their account
shall have allowed xls. for their convyding, and every proctor
shall pay his groat. Agreed August 4, 1579.
Fifthly, it is ordered that any proctors for their time being
shall not bestowe any moneys upon the reparacions of the church
or church lands, neither grant any lease of the church land without
the consent of a Vestry. And if they do the lease shall stand voyd
and the monies so bestowed upon their own cost and charges.
Sixthly, it is ordained that the proctors for their time being
shall do their diligence in gathering up the church rent, and all
other the church profits, as darks' wages, moneys for pews and
Ancient Bristol Documents. 195
bellsy and other revenues coming and growing towards the
church to the uttermost of their power.
Seventhly, it is ordained that any proctors for their time being
shall not put in or take out of the almshouse any of the
alms people without the consent of a Vestry ; if there be that be
ungodly, uncharitable and unquiet, having three admonitions of
the proctors and will not amend, that then it shall be lawful for
the proctors to displace them.
Eighthly, it is ordered that this great book of account with all
other books of accounts shall be kept and remain in the treasure
coffer from time to time.
Ninthly, it is ordained that the proctors for the time being
shall whether they hfive just occasion or none occasion call
four Vestries by the year, that is to say every quarter one,
and for non-doing of the same they shall forfeit to the church for
CVCIJ DUUll UClOrUlb
John Brampton
1544
liU.
Michael Sowdley -
1566
W. Belsher -
1552
ElCHARD AliKYN
1563
Phitjp Captrell
William Gbbbes
1558
Edmund Rogers
1560
William Sutton
1559
BiCHARD BlBWETT -
1561
Bobert Burgess
1561
Nicholas Blake
1564
Bobert Ai.flatt
1568
BicHARD Woodcock •
1560
John Hamond
The dates placed after the names are those of the years in
which the person named served the ofl&ce of Warden. It will be
noticed that they extend back through the whole period of the
Beformation. The accounts of 1544, when John Brampton
served, are the oldest that we possess ; of course they contain
entries relating to the old unreformed service of the Church
of England, receipts for Cross and bells, and payments for the
Sepulchre light, for bearing of the copes in procession, for holy
water springalls, and other matters of the same kind. William
Belsher had served in the last year of King Edward and the first
of Queen Mary, he had received back the bells from the King's
Commissioners, and had paid for the setting up of a new Bood.
Michael Sowdley comes down as a man of evil odour ; he it was
who broke all the windows containing '' Trinities and Crucifixes,"
and took down the old cross in the churchyard ; however, to
make amends, he restored to the church the old Latin Bible •
196 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
The meeting at which these ordinances were set forth was
not an ordinary vestry meeting, for several of those who
signed had not served the office of warden, but rather as the
expression, "proctors and major sort," implies a gathering of
the chief of the parishioners. And no doubt the ordinances
were not a new set of constitutions framed at that time, but
rather a declaration of customs which had been long observed
but which it seemed well to place on record at a time when
the old order in things ecclesiastical was changing and giving
place to a new one.
It is a very remarkable thing that these ordinances are strictly
followed so far as the altered circumstances of the times will
permit, and yet their observance is entirely owing to the tradition
of successive generations of vestrymen ; the very existence of
these orders was, I believe, unknown. Very hkely their traditional
observance had come down from a long series of vestrymen
to those who framed the orders.
The normal type of a City Vestry in Bristol is a self-elected
body, into which a member is admitted by election to the office
of junior warden, the next year he serves as senior warden, and
continues to be a member so long as he retains an interest,
by ownership or occupation, in the parish. He cannot resign.
The Incumbent is a member by custom in right of his induction,
by which he was admitted to the temporal privileges of his
benefice.
By the first rule it is clear that the Vestry was composed then,
as now, of the old wardens ; also that then, as now, the right and
duty of summoning meetings lay with the wardens.
By the second rule it is clear that the new wardens were chosen
by the old wardens as they are now; custom over-riding the
right of election both of the vicar and the parishioners. The
election made by the Vestry is still declared to the people during
the service on the Sunday after the vestry meeting ; when I first
went to the parish I was unaware of the custom and omitted to
give the usual notice, but I was at once reminded of my duty by
the clerk.
It is worthy of remark that down to the year 1593 the wardens
were chosen just as they are in most parishes now, to serve
for their year, very rarely serving again in the next year ; but
from 1593 onwards the junior warden of one year has always
' Ancient Bristol Documents. \cfi
served as senior warden in the year following. It would be
interesting to see whether a similar change of custom occurred in
other Bristol parishes about that timer and if possible to trace
the cause of the change.
It is curious that of the three keys of the treasure coflfer only
one was to be kept by the wardens, the other two by t\yo of the
leading parishioners. We may notice that the vicar is nowhere
mentioned in the rules ; I believe the cause is accidental, that he
was at the time non-resident. The Wells registers are deficient
at the time, and the name of the vicar in 1562 is unknown ;
I suspect that Arthur Saule, who was Prebendary of Bedminster
in Salisbury Cathedral, had appointed himself to the vicarage,
but he was Prebendary also of Bristol, and can have had little
time for parochial matters. In 1600, Samuel Davies, Vicar, had
apparently come into residence, and from that time onwards he
and his successors always sign the Vestry minutes first, and have
been chairmen of St. Thomas' Vestry, though not at St.
Mary EedcliflF.
It is remarkable that it is said that the balance in the hands of
the wardens is to be conveyed to the treasure coflfer " with the
assistance of the parish." This direction, coupled with the fact
that two of the keys were kept "in the hands of two of the
ancientest of the parish," seems to show that the parishioners
outside the Vestry were not altogether ignored with regard to the
conduct of Vestry business. They took no part in it, but their
interest in it was recognised.
Moreover, in our oldest lease, which bears date March 8, 1451,
and which conveys the property on which Warry's Court, in
Redcliflf Street, now stands, to Richard Foster for 36 years, at an
annual rent of 6s. 8d., the property is granted by John Burton
and Matthew Sherwyn " ex assensu et consensu omnium paro-
chianorum ecclesiae parochialis St. Thomae, Bristol." Of course,
in their literal meaning the words cannot be true, indeed, a general
meeting of parishioners would be a most unfit body to regulate
the Church property, but they seem to imply that some sort of
interest in the management of that property was recognised as
belonging to the general body of the parishioners. No such
clause has now been used for at least three centuries.
The Convydings, or feasts, form a prominent feature in the
vestry accounts of the period. In 1566, on the occasion of
198 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the sealing of the lease of the new water pipe, the Vestry provided
for the parishioners " a convyding of wine, fruit, biscuits,
caraways, and other things " at a cost of vs. ixH- But any excuse
was good enough for a drinking, from the presenting of a
dead Chantry Priest to a Bishop's Visitation; Mr. Thomas
Brent, in the year 1746 spent ITs. 6d. '* in washing down the
oath " of admission I suppose. It is to be hoped that the
operation was performed to his satisfaction.
The Almshouse referred to in rule 7 is the Almshouse in
Long Kow, commonly known as Burton's Almshouse, which
is still under the control of the Vestry. It is mentioned in 1385,
m the will of Walter Derby, and there is no reason to doubt the
tradition which connects its foundation \^ith Simon de Burton,
c : 1292 ; at any rate, it existed before the time of John Burton,
who died in 1455.
The chief points of interest in the rules are these, that they
show that the customs of the Vestry of St. Thomas are now almost
exactly what they were 825 years ago ; and that they suggest
the question whether the customary ix)wers which even then
belonged to the Vestry, had not grown out of a pre\'iou8 state
of things when the parishioners had possessed a greater interest
in the management of the affairs of the Church than they did in
1568. In other words they raise the question which is answered
by the earlier constitutions of St. Stephen's which follow, whether
the Vestries of the City parishes were not originally open.
No. VII.
In the name of God, amen. In the year of our Lorde God
d.m.cccccxxiiijto (A.D. 1524), and the xvth daye off August
m the xiijth yere of the reig(n)e of oure sovereign lorde kynge
Henry the viijth. Hyt is accordyd inacted and agreede by
Thomas Harson, parson of the parishe churche of Seynt Stephans
the Martyr yn Bristoll, within the diocese of Worcestur, Jhon
Savage and Hew Jonys, proctors of the same churche, Robert a
Vyntre, Wyllyam Goodwyn, John Harbarde, Davithe Vayhan,
Willyam Tynye, Jerome Grene, Edmond Bodye, John Amayn,
Hew Norishe, Wyllyam Nashe, Edward Jonys, John Barnard,
Nicholas Alwyne, Rycharde Vayhan, Bycharde Ballob, John
Ancient Bristol Documents. 199
Gane, Kichaard Williams, Nicholas Morton, John Eede, John
Thomas, John Hathwey, Harrye Hoper, with all the whole assent
ande consent of the whole parishonars of the seyd parishe of
seynt Stephans aforesaid, That all these articles and com-
posicyons folowinge concernynge the good rule and order of the
said churche shall be well and trewlye observide ande kept from
thens forthe for ever more, upon payne and forfetture oflf these
penaltiese folowynge hereafter: —
First, hyt is agreed that the pi-yncypall proctor for the
tyme beinge, the whiche dothe receyve al maner of receytes
ande casualtese^ unto the said churche belongynge or com-
mynge, whatsoever they be, shall brynge in his trew
accomptys of all maner receytys and chargis that belongithe
to the said churche by the fyrst mundaye folowynge after the
puryficacyon of our blessed lady the vyrgyn, then and there to
make his accomptis before the whole parishonars there aperinge,
and there to discharge himself ofif all suche treasure and goodys
as he hath or hadd in his kepynge the sayde yere, and also such
receytis of rentis and casualtese as he hathe receyvid off the
said churche in his yere beinge; and he that dothe make
defaute to performe and kepe the articles shall forfet and paye
xl. s. sterling, whereof half shall remayne to our moder churche
of Worcetur ande the other halfe unto the churche of Seynt
Stephans aforesaid ; agaynst the whiche daye of accompt the
curate shall wame al the whole parishonars in generall to appear
thean and there in the sayd churche, and there to receyve here
ande see the said accomptis, which accomptis to be gevyn at viij
of the clok in the mornynge ; ande every man that faylithe,
being lawfully warnyd, except an excuse resonable for his defaute,
shall paye forte pens sterlynge as hit is rehersyd afore ; and
thean and there the sayde proctor to be dischargyd, and the
second proctor to contynnew as pryncypall proctor and to have
a felowe chosyn thenne the same daye to be seconde proctor
withe hym ; and he that thenn refusithe to be assocyate or
felow with the seyd proctor shall paye xx. s. in maner and
forme before sayd. Also it is condescended^ and agreed that
' The casualties would be such miscellaneous receipts as payments for pews,
for the cross and bells, or for the clerkb* wages.
' * Condescend, to agree, East. This is also an archaism. Halliwell,
Dictionary of Archaic and Provincial words.
200 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
there shall be do proctor nor proctors let out no tenement
nor tenementis of the sayd churche for yeres or Ijvds without
the advyse ande consent of the pai'son and xij of the princypall
parishonars of the same parishc, or the most parte of the same,
and m the contrarye doynge that he or they that so dothe shall
paye xli sterlinge to the use of the churchis aforesayd. Also
that no proctor of any chauntry of the sayd churche let out
nether housys nor landis for yeres nether lyvis without the
assent and consent of the parson ande xij of the most honest
men of the seyde parishe, or the most part of themme ; and he
or they that dothe the contrarye shal paye xli, in maner and
forme afore sayde. Also hit is agreed thate at any tyme that
the seyde parsonne or the seyde proctors or theyre successors
with xij of the pryncypall menne of the seyde parishe, or the
most part of themme, that at all tymes whenne there shal be any
mocyon to be movid for to cesse or taske* the ij clerkys wagys or
tabuls,* or any wother reasonable thynge that* shal be to the
honour of God and our blessyd Lady and oflF Saynt Stephan,
necessarye to be had for the sayde church at all tymes, the sayde
parson proctors and the xij princypall menne or the most part of
themme doth cesse or taske the seyd parishonars, every manne
to obey thereto and to performe the cessynge or taskynge, and he
or they that doth or will denye this act shall paye vj s. and viij d.
sterlynge in maner and forme aforesayde, tociens quociens ; and
that no manner of manne shall dispyse no proctor or proctors for
requyrynge of the churche dewtese or clarkys wagys or theyr
tabulls, upon payne of forfetture xij. d, tociens quociens, to the
use afore sayd. Also that any manne of the sayde parishe or
of any other parishe holdynge or kepynge any tenement or
tenementis that hath beyne dwellynge housis in tymes past
within the sayde parishe, that thenne he or they that so dothe
shall paye the clerkes wagys and here the church taske as wother
men dothe, and he that denyeth shall paye forte pens, tociens
quociens, as is afore rehersid. Also that the seyde proctor or
proctors, or theyr deputys, at every pryncypall feast shal be redy
3* Task. (2) Taske that a price gadereth, tavXx, Halliwell. To task was
to tax.
^Tabuls. Probably the lists of contributors to the clerks* wages or Easter
offerings. There are several such lists in the wardens* accounts of S. Thomas
Church.
Ancient Bristol Documents. 20 1
to sett on the copys on the prystys at evenyngesonge, matens,
processyons, and hye masse, withe chyldryn to here theam upp,
upon payne of forfetture of iiij. d. toeiens quociens, except an
excuse reasonable provyd by the parson or his depute, to the use
aforeseyd. Also that every proctor or proctors of every chauntrye
within the seyde churche shall make theyre accomptis upon the
Munday after Candelmas daye afore sayd, or the morow after
folowynge, upon payne of xl. s., sterlinge in maner afore seyd.
Also, hit is agreed that ande yff hyt happyn the parson or
proctors or theyre successors att any tyme do command or send
for any of the seyd parishonars to have communicacion with
themm, that theann they to comme and tarye tyl syche com-
municacion or accomptys be ended, for the behave and profet
of the seyde churche, and he or they that commythe not and
taryethe not the seyd accomptis or communicacion shall paye
ij. s., toeiens quociens, as is afore seyde, except a lawful excuse
provid by the parson or his depute. Also, and yff any of the
seyd parishonars dothe feyn himself seke or goo from whome
after that they be lawfully warnyd, that thenn every of themm that
so dothe shall paye xij. d, toeiens quociens, to the use afore seyd.
Ande also yff hit happyn that the sayd proctor or proctors fynd
any of the parishonars in any suche faute, that thean to present
him or them to the ordynarye of the seyd diocese to sewe for the
seyd penaltie, and in the contrarye doynge the sayd proctor or
proctors or theyr successors to paye xij. d., toeiens quociens, ut
predicitur. Also hyt is inactyd that the parson and proctors and
theyre successors shall order at everye pryncypall ande double
feast a decon ande subdecon, to be vesturyd and processyon and
hye masse of the seyd feastis, upon payne of iiij. d, toeiens
quociens, to the use afore sayd, except there be a reasonable
excuse hadde and provyd. Also that the seyde proctors and
theyre successors shall kepe an obyte for Water TyncoU, yerely,
by the prystys and clerkys of the sayd churche, upon the xyjth
daye of Marche, ande an other obyte for all benefactors and
good doers, to be kept the ixth daye after Ester daye, upon payne
of forfettyng of vi. s., viij. d., toeiens quociens, to the use afore
sayd. Also that the seyd proctors and theyre successors shall
yerely present thys present wrytynge, with all wother wrytingis
of feoffamentis, at the seyd daye of accomptys, that new feoffors
maye be made, yf nede requyre, acordynlye to the tenor of our
8
±oi Clifton Antiquarian Club.
wryting is, upon payne of forfettynge xx. d. tociens quociens, to
the use afore sayd. Also hitt is agreed that all suche money as
belong to the seyd church or chauntys, withe other specyall
wrytyngis and our common seale, to be put in a cofin in the sayd
church, havynge iij. lockys, and the parson or his depute to have
one key, ande an auncyant man of the parishe to have an other
key, ande the pryncipall proctor to have the thyrd key, for the
save custody of the premysis. Moreover hyt is agreed, and for a
fynall conclusyon determyned, over and above all and synglar
payneys and penaltese above rehersed, that we the fomamyd
parson, proctors, withe all the whole parishonars afore sayd, or
the more parte thereofif, bynd us and our successors, parsons,
proctors, and parishonars, for tyme beynge, for evermore, by
these presentys, to abyyd and obey all maner of customs of
wholy churche or any other lawfuU payns to be fulminated ande
executed against us, for the observans ande the performynge of
the premyssis, at the jugement of my lorde the by shop of
Worcestur, our ordynarye, or in his abzens the vicar generall for
the tjnne beynge. In witnesse whereof and performang per-
petuall of these our seyd agrementis, consentis, and actys, ande
penaltese, ande every of them, welle ande trewly to be observed,
fulfylled, and kept, we the seyd parson, proctors, and parishonars
hathe put to our commyn scale the day ande yere above expresszd.
Ande furthermore, for a more sure and stronge coniirmacion of
the premysis, we have instantly deyned ande reciuyred Master
John Bell, Doctor oflF Comon, now beynge vicar generall of thys
diocese, to confyrme and put to his authorite and seale of his
office to these our present actes and wrytnge.
Et nos Johannes Bell,^ decretorum doctor, reverendi in Christo
patris et domini, domini Jeronimi,® Dei et Apostolici Sedis gratia
Wigornensis Episcopi, in remotis agentis, vicarius in spiritualibus
s John Bell, LL.D., was Archdeacon of Gloucester in 1518 and 1589 ; he
obtained the prebend of Demford in Lichfield Cathedral in 1526, and the
prebends of Nomianton in Southwell, Asgardby in Lincoln, and Beculverland in
S. Paul's in 1528. On the resignation of Bishop Latimer, in 15S9, ho was
appointed to the See of Worcester, and it was during his episcopate that the
diocese of Bristol was formed ; he resigned the See on November 17, 1543, and
dying on August 11, 1556, he was buried in Clerkenwell Church, London.
^ This was Jerome de Qhinucci, who had been appointed to the See by the Pope
in 1522 ; both he and Lorenzo Campegio, Bishop of Salisbury, were deprived of
their Sees by Act of Parliament in 1535 on account of non-residence.
Ancient Bristol Documents. 203
generalis, ad specialem rogatum et requisitionem supradictorum
rectoris, Iconomorum/ et parochianorum, seu saltem majoris et
sanioris partis eorundem, primitus et diligenter examinatis per
nos matura cum deliberatione omnibus et singulis articulis,
clausulis, conditionibus, ac penis supradictis ad firmiorem eon-
firmationem et corroborationem premissorum, auctoritate nostra
ordinaria premissa omnia et singula approbamus, et quantum in
nobis est confirmamus, ac eisdem omnibus melioribus via modo et
forma eflScatioribus quibus de jure possumus, auctoritatem
nostram ordinariam impartimus Sigillumque quo in hujus modi
vicariatus officio ad presens utimur apponi et communiri fecimus.
Datum apud Corinium® quo ad sigillationem xvii^ die Decembris
Anno Domini millesimo quingentesimo vigesimo quarto.
These constitutions shew two bodies of men as interested in
the regulation of the affairs of St. Stephen's Church ; first, a
general assembly of all parishioners ; secondly, a small body
composed of the rector, the wardens, and twelve principal men,
in whose hands the actual management of the church business lay.
The general assembly, or open Vestry, as we should call it, was
an essential part of the parochial organization. '^ All the whole
parishioners in general " were to appear in the church at the
summons of the curate, for the passing of the warden's accounts,
which accounts it is distinctly declared they are to ** receive, hear,
and see ; " the people were not merely permitted to be present
while the accounts were gone through by a select Vestry, but so
necessary was their presence considered to a complete audit that
every one who absented himself after having been duly sum-
moned subjected himself to the infliction of a fine. For the
warden was " to make his accounts before the whole parishioners
there appearing."
Again, it was in their open meeting of all the parishioners, that
the new warden should be chosen, who would serve as fellow to
1 By the 26th Canon of the Council of Chalcedon, A.D. 451, it was ordered that
an ceconomus, or steward, should be chosen out of the clergy of each diocese, who
should manage its revenues, and the title was frequently given to the steward or
treasurer of a cathedral or religious house in later times ; it was thus a natural
one to apply to a churchwarden who had the control of the property of a parish
church.
' The word in the original is a rather obscure contraction, but I believe it
represents ** Corinium," the old name for Cirencester.
204 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the junior warden of the preceding year now promoted to the
post of senior.
Furthermore, the parishioners not only possessed the privileges
which they have since lost of attendance at vestry meetings, and
at the election of wardens, but they have also been relieved of
the duty of acting as counsellors to the rector or wardens. At
least, if we are so to understand the clause which inflicts a fine
of two shilUngs on any parishioner who shall refuse to attend
when summoned by the parson and wardens for any communica-
tion, and one shilling additional if he shall feign himself sick or
shall go away from Bristol.
However, as the rules seem to contemplate the possibility that
people might wish to avoid these " communications," it may be
that they were sometimes of an unpleasant nature relating to
moral or spiritual delinquencies, and resulting in the infliction of
fines.
In such cases it is much to be hoped that the pai'son and
wardens did not keep those whom they summoned long ** tarry-
ing," while they deliberated on the nature of the offence, and the
measure of its punishment.
There are among the St. Thomas papers two bonds to keep the
peace, dated 1453 and 1478, in which persons are bound to the
churchwardens in a certain sum of money to keep the peace
towards their neighbours. It is too often forgotten that church-
wardens are still spiritual officers, bound to present offenders to
the bishop or archdeacon at his visitation.
Finally, these constitutions are said to have been made '' with
all the whole assent and consent of the whole parishioners of the
said parish of St. Stephen," and sealed with their common seal ;
which seal is still in existence. Inasmuch, however, as a Vestry
is not a corporation with a right to the possession of a seal, the
use of the seal would have added nothing to the binding nature
of the document, though it might be thought to add to its
appearance.
But besides the general assembly of parishioners corresponding
to our open Vestry, there was also a smaller body consisting of
the rector, wardens, and twelve principal parishioners, in which
we may detect the germ of our City Select Vestries.
To this body was committed the care of the possessions of the
church, no lease of any property either for years or for lives was
Ancient Bristol Documents, 205
to be granted by the wardens without the consent of this assembly
of notables, and the same rule was to hold with regard to the
property of the Chantries. They also imposed a church rate, as
we should say, whenever it became necessary to cess or tax the
parishioners for the clerk's wages, or Easter offerings, as they are
now called, or for any other purpose. But, inasmuch as it was
thought possible that some people might refuse to pay the church
rate, or to contribute to Easter offerings, it was determined that
anyone who should so despise the warden as to refuse his reason-
able requirement of the church duties, should, for his hardihood,
be fined twelve pence. No doubt after a ** communication " from
the rector and wardens.
With regard to the composition of this inner body, it does not
appear what qualifications were requisite for membership, or how
new members were admitted to its number, so that it would be
going too far to say that it consisted, like the modern Vestries, of
all those who have served the office of warden ; but no doubt the
cases would at any rate be very few in which a man would be
admitted to membership of so influential a body who had not
already served as churchwarden.
Concerning the custody of the Vestry funds, we might suppose
that the rector and principal warden represented the small inner
. body, while the ancient man of the parish guarded the interests
of the general body of parishioners.
Comparing these constitutions with the constitutions set forth
in St. Thomas' parish about forty years afterwards, we see at
once how much less power was possessed by the parishioners in
general at the later than at the earlier period. So far from being
summoned to Vestry meetings, or their presence being in any way
considered necessary, or even desirable, their existence is only
slightly noticed when it is said that after the body of past
wardens have examined and passed the year's accounts the
balance shall be transferred to the chest "with the assistance of
the parish.*'
So also with regard to the election of the new warden ; in
St. Stephen's parish, in 1524, he is elected in open Vestry at a
general assembly of parishioners ; in St. Thomas', in 1563, he is
chosen by the select Vestry, and the parishioners have to be
content with hearing who has been set over them during divine
service on the Sunday after the election. It seems strange that
2o6 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the custom by which the junior warden of one year became the
senior in the next, which is now the rule in all the City parishes,
should have been observed in St. Stephen's in 1524, and yet
should not have been introduced at St. Thomas' till 1598.
It would seem probable that there would be among the
documents in the possession of other City churches, copies of
regulations similar to those of St. Stephen and St. Thomas which
we have been considering, and which might throw much light on
the manner in which the general body of the parishioners lost
the rights which formerly belonged to them. There is indeed no
difficulty in imagining a process by which this deprivation might
have been effected ; neglect in the maintenance of their right to
attend the vestry meetings, or backwardness in asserting it, on
the part of the less wealthy parishioners, and a grasping at
power on the side of the more influential men who had served
the office of warden or who hoped to do so in the future, would in
the course of a comparatively short time be sufficient to change
the old open Vestry into the close Vestry with which we are now
familiar. In some of the modern Bristol parishes attempts have
been made to conduct the church business by means of a close
Vestry, instead of the open Vestry of all ratepayers. But it
would at any rate have been interesting to know whether there were
no parochial Hampdens who resented and resisted this absorption
of the powers of the whole parish into the hands of a few, or
whether interest in the affairs of the parish church became so
languid that people in general were quite content to be legislated
for, instead of taking their own proper share in the management
of the business of that church which belonged to poor and rich
alike.
However that may be there can now be no upsetting of the
customary right of the select Vestries to manage the affairs of
the City churches. If people are too careless and apathetic to
manage their own business, they must be content to leave others
to manage it for them.
Peculiarities of Ancient Painted Glass. 207
^n ^ome Optical ^tcultanttes; of indent
^aintetr <(lla$8.
By FRANCIS FOX TUCKETT, F.R.Ct.S.
{Read December 20ih, 1887.)
'* The silver light, so pale and faint
Shew'd many a prophet, and many a saint
Whose image on the glass was dyed :
Full in the midst, his Gross of Red
Triumphant I^Iichael brandished,
And trampled the Apostate's pride.
The moonbeam kissed the holy pane,
A fid threw on tJie pavement a bloody stain.**
T)m ''Lay of the last Minstrel," Canto 2, xi.
The moonlight may have done so when Walter of Deloraine visited
the Monk of St. Mary's aisle at Melrose nearly three and a half
centuries ago, if the glass of the **east oriel" was then com-
paratively new and unusually free from inequalities of texture,
and if, too, the light of the moon is ever sufficiently powerful to
throw colour in this way, which, so far as my own observation
goes, I more than doubt. ^ Be this, however, as it may, I have
' Compare too, the beautiful description of Keats.
** A casement high and triple-arch'd there was.
All garlanded with carven imageries
Of fruits, ajid flowers, and bunches of knot-grass,
And diamonded with panes of quaint device.
Innumerable of stains and splendid dyes.
As are the tiger-moths deep-damask'd wings ;
And in the mid'st, *mong thousand heraldries,
And twilight saints, and dim emblazonings,
A shielded scutcheon blush' d with blood of queens and kings.
FuU on this casement shone the wintry moon,
And threw wann gulss on Madeline's fair breast.
As down she knelt for heaven's grace and boon ;
Bose-blooin fell on Jier Jiajuls, together prestj
And on lier silver cross soft aniethyst.
And on her hair a glory, like a saint :
She seem'd a splendid angel, newly drest.
Save wings, for heaven : — Porphyrio grew faint :
She knelt, so pure a thing, so free from mortal taint."
Tlie Eve of St. Agnes, xxiv-v.
2o8 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
no hesitation in asserting that, in the case of ancient glass,
however rich its tints may still appear to the eye, no
appreciable trace of them can be detected on the walls, floor, or
columns of a building, even when its painted windows are most
powerfully illuminated by the sun itself.
I may own that it has cost me some time and trouble finally
to convince myself of the fact, and I am therefore the less
surprised at the general hesitation, or actual disbelief, with
which I have found that such a statement is generally received,
even by many of those whose constant opportunities of proving
its accuracy might, one would think, have already famiharized
them with it. Clergymen, vergers, parish clerks, chapel keepers
at Oxford and Cambridge, students of, and writers on coloured
glass, no less than most other sorts and conditions of men, seem
never to have noticed this striking distinction between ancient
and modern painted windows, and, when I alluded to it at a
dinner party during the meeting of the British Association at
Birmingham in 1886, I was laughed at and chaffed by some
distinguished lights in science. In the presence of these Nestor s
I felt the truth of the well-known remark of the late
Master of Trinity, Dr. Thompson, to the youthful but positive
undergraduate, ''We are none of us infallible, not even
the youngest," and having at that time only a small array of
facts at my command, I might have modestly collapsed had not
my friend. Dr. Sebastian Evans, who happened to be present,
after allowing the sceptics to commit themselves fully, come to
my rescue in the most effectual manner. Justifying his own right
to speak on such a question with some authority on the ground
of having been for seven years the manager of Messrs. Chance's
glass works, he pronounced my statement to be absolutely correct,
and added that he had, on behalf of the firm, devoted several
months to studying and drawing the famous windows (mostly
13th Century) of Chartres Cathedral, and that the one in-
fallible method of distinguishing between the ancient glass and
more modern insertions was to allow the sunlight to stream
through the windows upon a sheet of paper fastened on a board,
when any resultant spots of colour corresponded exclusively
with the more recent additions.
Amongst the various places where I have tested, or obtained
confirmation of, the truth of my proposition I may name the
Peculiarities of Ancient Fainted Glass. 209
Chapel of Merton College, Oxford (1276-1307), Fairford Church
(late 15th or early 16th Century), Christ Church Cathedral,
Oxford, Lichfield Cathedral (1580-40), and the Mayor's Chapel,
Bristol. Fairford, unfortunately, affords a specially good test.
I say unfortunately, because it depends on the fact that, when
the old glass of the upper portion of the grand W. window was sent
away for ** restoration," it literally never was restored at all, but
an entirely new production took its place, whilst the ancient
glass still remains in the lower and larger division.
Wishing to avoid giving any clue to the drift of my questions, I
asked the clerk at Fairford whether the church was not rather dark
with so many coloured windows. His reply was "No, sir; you
see they are ancient, and so they don't cast a shadow," and he
added " Well, I mean all except the upper part of the W. window ;
that do cast shadows when the sun gets round to the West"
" But," I said, still wishing him to speak quite spontaneously,
" that upper part is new glass and it surely ought not to cast
80 dark a shadow as the old." " Ah ! " he replied, " when I said
shadow, 'twas colour I meant. Now, when the sun shines there,
you see bright colours thrown on the North clerestory wall from
the upper, but none whatever from the old and lower, part."
Again, in the chapel of Merton College, the sunshine being
unusually brilliant, I called the chapel keeper's attention to the
absence of coloured patches on the floor or opposite wall, and he
at once admitted that such was the fact, but that he had never
before noticed it ! He entered into the question with a good
deal of interest, and helped me to test it thoroughly by
converting his apron into a screen for the reception of any
colour that might be projected upon it.
Lastly, on talking to our able local artist on glass, Mr. Bell,
of College Green, I learned that, though the fact in question was
now known to him, it had not long been so, and he had had con-
siderable difficulty in convincing his foreman of it until he
proved it experimentally with pieces of ancient and modern
glass.
I was asked by my critics at Birmingham to explain the cause
of the phenomenon in dispute, but naturally hesitated to attempt
to assign reasons for a fact which they did not accept, and, not
unnaturally, met by the question how the impression of rich and
brilliant colour from, say, a piece of old ruby glass, could be made
2IO Clifton Antiquarian Club.
directly on the retina, whilst the eye fails to distinguish it on
such surfaces as marble, paper, wood, &;c. When Dr. Evans'
confirmation of my accuracy put a new complexion on the
matter, I ventured to assign as one reason the change which the
action of atmospheric and other agents works on the surface of
most ancient glass, whether we call it oxidation or a more or less
complete devitrification, resulting in a breaking up, often to a
considerable depth, of the molecular arrangement of the
material, thus increasing the originally greater opacity which
characterizes ancient glass. Further reflection, and certain
simple experiments, to which I will presently refer, have con-
vinced me that this is, in fact, a correct, though probably not the
only, explanation. First, however, let me quote some authorities
on the subject of painted glass, beginning with Winston.^
''AH ancient window glass was originally clear and trans-
parent. ^ It perhaps was not, at least until the 16th century,
so perfectly transparent as modern glass, being, in general,
less homogeneous than it, owing to the imperfect state
of the manufacture formerly ; but it was, when new, sufficiently
clear to admit of distant objects being easily seen through it. The
film^ which usually subdues the brilliancy of old glass, and
imparts to it a fine harmonious tone, is but the effect of the
surface of the glass having become decomposed by the action of
the weather, or of extraneous substances, such as lichens, or the
rust from the saddle-bars, &c., adhering to it. Decomposition
takes place in glass in different ways and degrees, according to its
texture, the manner in which it is painted, and its position.
The glass on the south side of a building is in England always
more corroded than that on the north side ; that containing the
least portion of alkaline matter seems most effectually to resist
the action of the atmosphere ; and the painting upon it, or even
the staining, sometimes preserves it from injury, or hastens its
decay. In some cases the corrosion on the back of the glass is
confined to those parts which are opposite to the shadows and
painted outlines, or at least is most active in these parts ; in
other cases, especially in early English and early Decorated
'See "An inquiry into the difference of style observable in ancient glass
paintings, especially in England ; with Hints on Glass Painting,*' by the late
Charles Winston, 2nd edition, pp. 23-24.
3 But see the quotation from Mr. Fowler on this point.
Peculiarities of Ancient Painted Glass. 211
examples, the original thickness of the glass is preserved only in
those parts which are opposite the painted outlines, the coarse of
which may therefore be traced on the back of the sheet by corres-
ponding lines a little raised above the general surface. In some
cases the surface of the glass has been eaten away without
reference to the painting on the other side, leaving the course of
the streaks formed in the manufacture of the glass marked by small
corresponding ridges which have escaped corrosion. Some glass
is perforated to some little depth with small round holes ; other
glass has its whole surface eaten away, all old glass is more or less
covered with a slight film on both sides, but, upon breaking it,
the interior of the sheet is always found to be clear and trans-
parent, the obscurity being confined to its surface."
Referring to early English glass, the most ancient — and
therefore, presumably, the most affected by the atmosphere —
existing in this country, with the exception of a few scattered
relics of late Norman date, Mr. Winston remarks (p. 86,) " The
coloured windows are perfect mosaics, of the most vivid, intense,
and gem-Uke tints. Their tone of colouring is deep, harmonious,
and rich, but not gay : they exclude more light than perhaps any
other painted windows, and their general effect is extremely
solemn and impressive." Again (p. 50,) he says of the same
style, "The glass of this period (early English), though
sufficiently transparent, when unobscured by decomposition, to
enable objects to be easily seen through it, is yet less homo-
geneous than modern glass, and consequently not so perfectly
transparent. This peculiarity in the texture of the material
imparts to the lightest coloured pot-metals, and even to the
white glass itself, a remarkable degree of richness and strength,
admirably adapted to harmonize with the stiff and hard execution
of the paintings. It also causes the colours to preserve their
distinctive tints, when wrought in minute pieces into mosaics."
So much for Winston who, as far as an examination of the
work from which I have quoted enables me to judge, seems to
have been unaware of the optical results in the transmission of
colour due to the decomposition to which he refers.
I next cite the authority of a long and very interesting and
learned article "On the process of decay in glass, and, in-
cidentally, on the composition and texture of glass at different
periods, and the history of its manufacture," by James Fowler,
212 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Esq., F.S.A., Local Secretary for the County of York, in
** Archeeologia," vol. 46, part 1 (1880), kindly lent me by our
Secretary, who first called my attention to it.
After referring to a statement by Bernard Palissy, in 1563,
that the glaziers in Poitou and Bretagne attributed the decay of
their church windows to the moon, he states (p. 67) that " Decaj-
takes place in several modes, which differ widely in appearance
according to the circumstances under which they are produced.
The primary modes of decay in glass are two — filmy and
granular : but of the latter there are four secondary forms which
I propose to call respectively — superficial creeping, deep
creeping, spotty or pitting, and splitting or crackling granular."
The first (** filmy ** decay) is that which produces the iridescence,
often so exquisite, with which we are all familiar in specimens of
Egyptian, Assyrian, Cypriote, Greek, and Roman glass. The
second ("granular" decay), which is that principally affecting
mediaeval Gothic glass up to the 12th century, is, as we have
seen, divided by Mr. Fowler into four classes. As respects
English painted glass he remarks that '' Little is known of the
progress or development of the art in England during the middle
ages. We know, however, that glass makers were introduced
from Gaul by Benedict Biscop, to make glass for his monasteries
at Wearmouth and Jarrow, about A.D. 678. Robert le Verrer,
in 1295, and Matthew le Verrer, in 1300, were principal in-
habitants of the city of Colchester, and taxed for their
stock-in-trade ; the neighbouring coast in all probability
supplied them with sand, the plants which grew upon the
adjacent salt marshes with ashes, and the forest with wood.
And that window glass was afterwards made is clear from the
contract between the executors of Richard Earl of Warwick, and
John Prudde, of Westminster, 23rd June, 25 Hen. VI, for the
glazing of the Beauchamp Chapel at Warwick, in which it is
provided that " glasse from beyond the seas " shall alone be
used, and " no glasse of England."*
4 Mr. Hudd kindly supplies the following, and it is satisfactory to believe that
glass manufactured by a Bristolian was in sufficiently high estimation to be used
at Westminster, whatever prejudice against " glass of England " may have subse-
quently existed at Warwick.
** Bristol seems to have been in very early times connected with the manu-
fo^ture of window glass. In a paper ' on the death of Queen Eleanor of Castile,*
Peculiarities of Ancient Painted Glass. 2 1 3
Summarizing the conclusions scattered through Mr. Fowler's .
paper which bear upon my special subject, it appears to be well
ascertained that glass does not decay spontaneously through age
alone. The Abbe Suger's glass, for instance, at St. Denis, of the
middle of the 12th century " is scarcely decayed at all," whilst a
panel at York, 50 years later in date, ''is throughout in an
advanced state of pitting decay." (p. 100). It may be stated
(p. 102), (1,) That "different kinds of glass differ from one
another not only in chemical composition but in mechanical
texture. (2,) That these differences of composition and texture
determine the different forms of decay and disintegration, which
are partly chemical, partly mechanical processes. (3.) That
these changes are due partly to chemical, partly to mechanical
causes." Of the chemical causes the chief were impurity in the
materials employed — potash, sand, lime, etc., — and in the
colouring matters used for staining — crude oxides of cobalt,
copper, antimony, manganese, &c. Moreover, the metals were
imperfectly fused and incorporated, and thus were produced
unevenness of surface, inequalities of thickness, texture, and
density, striae, knots, air bubbles, waves, threads, crystals, &c.
** Hence," says Mr. Fowler (p. 112), ** Gothic glass is so
frequently said to resemble horn. In both a want of transparency
arises from interference to (sic) the direct passages of the
rays of light, caused by multiplicity of layers and irregularity
in their superposition."
And yet, the very causes which led to ultimate decay con-
tributed to the artistic effect, or, as Mr. Fowler puts it (p. 114),
** The rudeness and imperfection alike of composition and
texture in Gothic glass, far more than any fancied secret of * lost
pigments,* are the clue to its surpassing beauty." Irregularity
produced variety, and **no two pieces are alike." So, too, with
regard to the colours used in staining, the absence of
uniformity constituted a special charm, and *' thus was it that
those * flushed and melting spaces of colour, were ever brilliant
published in the 29th volume of Arclucologia^ the Rev. Jos. Hunter, F.S.A.,
quotes from certain accounts of Hugh de Kendal of monies paid and received by
him at Westminster in the year 1290 (19 Edw. I.), as follows : — * Kendal paid £64
and one mark to John de Bristol, the King's glazier, for making glass windows in
the church of Westminster.* Some fragments of very ancient glass still remain
in the Abbey, which may possibly have been the work of this worthy
Bristolian."
214 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
and yet quiet ; decided and yet tender ; gay as the plumage of a
tropical bird, and yet serious, if not solemn ; the tints imparted
by accidental admixtures qualifying that of the substance which
produced the dominant colour, even as the lighter shades of
emotion in a man diversify and soften his intellectual nature."
(p. 117.) As Yasari, whom Mr. Fowler quotes, says of the
subject of the calling of St. Matthew in one of the glorious
windows of the cathedral of Arezzo (by Guillaume de Marcillat
1530), ' It scarcely can be considered glass, but rather something
rained down from heaven for the consolation of men ! "
In one passage Mr. Fowler, though missing the peculiarity of
the non-transmission of colour except directly to the retina,
comes near to assigning its true cause when he says (p. 118),
** The numerous planes of different density which we have
noticed, instead of passively transmitting, break up and scatter
the transmitted beams of light, unequally refracting and
dispersing them as the layers of the atmosphere of different
density do the quivering light of a star, &c." If this be so,
then such action must be still more evident when decay of
structure has also taken place.
Having thus referred to the qualities in the character of
ancient painted glass which predispose it to decay, I must add a
few remarks on the active agents of that decay. Amongst
these we must reckon the dissolving power of water, especially
in the case of substances rich in alkalies. It corrodes the outer,
and sometimes even the inner, surface of windows, especially
those with an easterly or southerly exposure. Carbonic acid
and oxygen by their action, the one on the alkalies, and the other
in the conversion of protoxides into peroxides, are also efficient
causes of decay, and when to these we add gas, coke stoves, and
condensed breath, can we wonder that windows become affected,
especially when we remember that the external cold contracts
the outer, whilst the internal heat expands the inner, surface
of the glass, thus greatly aiding the process of corrosion?
On the other hand, dark brown painted outlines and yellow
stain, as a rule protect glass from decay.
My own experiments to produce a similar obscuration of
colour, in the case of new glass, to that observed in old specimens,
on the theory that the result is due to diminished transparency,
whether through decay alone or irregularities of original
Peculiarities of Ancient Painted Glass. 2 1 5
structure also, have been of three descriptions, {a) I applied
a piece of ordinary ground glass to the outside of the coloured
specimen and between it and the sun. {b) I substituted for
the ground glass a circular pane of 15th or 16th century Ve-
netian glass from a window in Titian's house at Cadore, the
external surface of which has become slightly decayed and horny
in character, (c.) Lastly, I ground with sand a portion of the
surface of the modern coloured specimen, so as to render it more
opaque and break up the rays of sunlight In each case, but
most markedly in the first and last, because the Venetian pane
acts somewhat like a lens, I found that the ruby colour was no
longer transmitted to a screen, though it still retained its tone
to the eye.
It remains to endeavour to account for this last fact of the
colour being visible when received on the retina, but no longer
perceptible when the light is thrown upon a screen, an
apparent anomaly which seemed to perplex my critics.
I confess I was at first rather puzzled to assign a reason,
but the matter now seems to me simple enough and to depend
merely on the far higher sensitiveness of the retina to direct
impressions of colour, if, indeed, it be the retina, and not rather
the interpreting brain (as Professor Bamsay has suggested in
reference to colour blindness)^ which possesses the sense in
question. The simple proof that there is such a difference
is afforded by the fact that, on a sunless and even dull day,
when no colour whatever is thrown on a screen even by a piece
of modern painted glass, its tint is yet ^yerfectly distinguish-
able to the eye. Now, in the case of ancient glass, the
extent of diminution of light, even on a sunny day, by
dispersion or scattering due to its structure and decay and
consequent increased opacity, is equivalent to that caused by a
gloomy day in the case of a specimen of modern glass, and the
result is, in both instances, the same, — ^non-transmission of
colour to a screen, but perception of it by the eye.
But it may be asked what, even if all this be granted, is the
practical outcome of it? Without claiming originality or
discovery, I may reply that it seemed to me at least a curious
and interesting circumstance that so apparently obvious a point
should have generally escaped writers on, and students of
s *' Procoedings of the Bristol Naturalists* Society," New Series, v. 119.
2i6 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
stained glass, not to mention those daily familiar Avith the effects
of sunlight on ancient and modern painted windows in our
churches, college chapels, halls, etc. Besides, the method seems
to afford a valuable and easy test of the age of glass, especially
when this is not easily accessible, at any rate as far as regards
the broad question of its being ancient or modern. Indeed, the
fact cited, on Dr. Evans' authority, in connection with the
Chartres windows, proves that it has already been practically
and successfully applied in the way suggested.
Of course specimens of ancient glass may occur free from
decay, like those at St. Denis, for instance, and then I should
not expect to meet with the effects described in this paper,
unless the irregular texture of the glass, apart from
devitrification, suffices to produce them. Such instances,
however, must be very rare if, as so careful an observer as
Mr. Fowler states (p. 187,) *'It is true that much old glass
does not appear to the naked eye to be decayed, but I have never
examined any (exposed to the weather) under the microscope
that has not been more or less so.'*
In conclusion, I fear that I may have been somewhat tedious
and technical, but I desired to do justice to the various con-
siderations involved in the thorough discussion of my subject,
and any blame for the infliction you have suffered should fairly
lie, at any rate in part, at the door of our valued Secretary,
Mr. Hudd, since it was solely at his bidding that I have
prepared this paper which I should otherwise never have
thought of imposing on your patience.
Note. — Having visited Chartres Cathedral on May 11th, ISSS, a day of
exceptionally brilliant sunshine, I can confirm Dr. Evans' statement referred to
in the text. With the exception of a few isolated patches, all of which I was able
distinctly to connect with pieces of more recent glass employed in restoration,
not a ray of coloured light was projected on any part of the interior, and, whilst
the superb windows glowed with the 'richest tints, the walls, pillars, and
pavement were entirely unaffected.
Notes on the Commerce of Bristol. 217
^ote« oil tje Commerce of 3Bn«toI \\\
tj)e IdtJ antr letj Centuries,
By JOHN LATIMER.
{JRead December 20M, 1887.)
The curious and interesting documents illustrative of local
commerce and civic affairs of which it is proposed to give a
summary were brought to light about sixty years ago by Mr.
Henry Bush, one of the leading Bristolians of his day, during a
legal struggle with the old Corporation on the subject of Town
Dues. Diligent search having been made amongst the records
tKen preserved in the Tower of London, and in the account books
of the corporation, Mr. Bush embodied the results in a pamphlet
entitled " Bristol Town Dues : a collection of original and inter-
esting Documents intended to explain and elucidate the above
important Subject." Owing to the ephemeral form of the work,
however, it has long been extremely scarce, and, as it never
received the attention it deserved from local historians, some of
its more salient features seem well deserving of republication.
At the outset of his work, Mr. Bush states that the town of
Bristol, which formed part of the royal demesne in the time of
William I., but was afterwards alienated, was reseized by the
crown during the reign of John, and was subsequently demised, by
successive monarchs, for terms of years or for life, sometimes to
the consort of the reigning sovereign, sometimes to favoured
courtiers, and sometimes to " the men of Bristol " — in other
words, the corporation. It is remarkable, by the way, that the
fee-farm rent reserved in many of these leases declined from
£245 in 1227, to £100, the sum fixed by Eichard II. in 1395,
when he granted the town, with the fairs, tolls on goods arriving
by land or water, court fines and fees, &c., to the mayor and
4
2 1 8 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
commonalty for a term of twelve years. In 1403, this rent, with
de20 additional arising from the " flesh shambles " in the town,
was granted by Henry IV. to his consort, Joanna, for life. On
her decease, in 1487, the estate (the lease to the corporation having
long expired) fell into the hands of Henry VI., and Clement
Bagot, the major, as Escheator, accounted to the Exchequer for
the moneys he had collected during the year ending Michaelmas,
1438. The full details are given by Mr. Bush from the accounts
still preserved in the Record OfiBce, but the following summary
must here suffice : —
From the fish and flesh staUs. (The rents vary from 4/- to 24/-, Simon
Ganynges held a staU at 10/-.) . . . . . . . . 14
" Bents called Langable " in various localities. The highest is 16/-
for the King's Garden upon St. Michael's mount ' . . 6
Langable for Trinity ward (28 small rents) . . . . . . 14 3^
Ditto division of St. Mary of the Market-place (Le Port), 26
rents . . . . . . . . . . 14 2)
Ditto division of All Saints, 29 rents . . 15 4
Ditto division of **St. Anthony" (Mr. Bush's copyist was
misled by an abbreviation of St. Andoen or (Ewen.) In ano-
ther place he converts it into St. Andrew), 28 rents . . 14 8}
Ditto Without the walls. Brod meade and Le Redlond are the
only places mentioned, 50 rents
Customs arising from merchandise imported in ships or boats
Customs on goods entering in or going out of the town gates
Fines and amercements in the Tolzey Court
For the King's mills in the town (half a year)
The item arising from imports is accompanied by a detailed
account of the sum received from every vessel entering the port
' There is reason to believe that this plot of ground can be identified, and its
history summarised for a period of more than 600 years. Li the Patent Bolls of 6th
Edward I. (m. 6 ; 82), is the ratification of a grant by Eleanor, Queen Consort, to
the marshal of her household, of aU the lands and houses, late of Isolda,
daughter and heir of Peter le Clerk, of Bristol, and also of those of Christiana,
Peter's wife, except a ** garden under Mount St. Brandon," which the Queen
reserved for her own use. How her majesty had got possession of the property is
indicated by another patent on the same roll (m. 26 ; 16) — a " significamus " to
the abbot and convent of St. Augustine's that ** their house wiU not be burdened
in any other case with any payments for support like that made, by request of
the King and Queen, to Christiana le Clerc during her life." There can be little
doubt that the *' King's Garden " of 1438 was the plot of ground reserved in 1278,
and that it came into the hands of the corporation in 1462 with the rest of the
crown estate. In 1838 the corporation sold, for £3,120, the " King's Orchard " in
St. Michael's ; and the buildings known as the Volunteer Club and the Blind
Asylum now stand upon the site.
..2 1
6
. . 21 16 10
8 17 10
.. 15 6
8
9 14
£80 15
4i
Notes on the Commerce of Bristol, 219
during the twelvemonth, including the names of those free from
customs, and this account is unquestionably the most impor-
tant in the collection, for it gives us definite and trustworthy
information as to the industry and commerce of the town in
the first half of the fifteenth century. The number of vessels
was 130, and all of them appear to have been very small.
Sixty-six are classed as " ships," and sixty- four as " boats ; "
many of the latter being doubtless fishing boats. The bulk
of the local trade was then with Ireland, the ports in the Bristol
channel, and Cornwall. Only seven ships appear to have
come from abroad, and as the number is so small it may be
as well to describe their cargoes. The Mary, of Bayonne,
brought two tons of iron and five "ton" [ten pipes] of wine;
and in a second voyage two pipes of honey. The Nicholas, of
Tours, had three tons and a pipe of iron. The John, of
Bayonne, a pipe of resin and " 100 of frankincense." The
Trinity, of Bre, from Gascony, four casks wine. The St.
John, of Bayonne, a cask of resin, and on a second voyage
a pipe of resin. The Christopher, of Bre, three pipes, four
casks, and twelve pieces of fruit. The Sous Sprus, of Bayonne,
three pipes, a hogshead, and eight casks wine. The cargoes
are so remarkably small that one cannot help surmising that
the vessels may have also transported troops or King's stores
for the English army which at that time occupied a large
portion of France. But, on the other hand, some of the Irish
trading ships were not more heavily laden, one having sailed
with a single ton of iron, another with " eight dozen of
cloth," which meant ninety-six yards, and a third with ten
barrels of salt. Upon arranging the whole of the cargoes
under heads, a more complete idea may be obtained of the
infant commerce of Bristol. The entire entries of wine, in-
wards and outwards, consisted of only sixteen pipes, one
hogshead and ten casks — a quantity which would have scarcely
sufiBced for the yearly consumption of the aldermanic body in
the convivial days of the eighteenth century. Sugar, of course,
there is none, but honey figures for seven pipes. Spirits and
ale are absent from the record, but it embraces two or three
pipes of mead. In addition to the fruit mentioned above,
there is a record of one barrel of grapes. Of animals we have
only six pigs; of materials for bread only five barrels of
220 Clifton A^itiquarian Club.
'^ flower." But the quantity of fish shows that Bristolians
were punctilious in observing the fasting regulations of the
church. Nearly 50,000 hake, haddock, stockfish, &c., besides
an immense quantity entered by measure, forty-three pipes of
salmon, and an enormous contingent of herrings formed the
cargoes of a large majority of the craft entering the port.
Much of this supply was probably salted, which would account
for the supply of salt recorded — about 180 casks. With refer-
ence to the leading industries of Bristol, which are well
known to have been weaving, soap making, and tanning, it is
strange to find no imports of wool, and only a few hundred-
weight of oil and tallow. On the other hand, we have over
1,000 hides, about 17,000 sheep skms, 11,000 lamb skins, 800
calf skins, 5,800 goat skins, 1,500 hare skins, 2,200 rabbit skins,
700 squirrel and fox skins, and about 150 deer skins. Of the
manufactured material the exports included 445J " dozen "
of cloths, a dozen being explained in a tariff of duties to be
twelve yards, and forty " dickers " of leather. Soap is not
mentioned at all. The early development of Irish linen
manufactures is remarkably proved by the accounts, no less
than 161 " hundreds " (hundreds of yards) being mentioned.
Of iron, as well inwards as outwards, the total is only eighteen
tons and four pipes. The list is completed with " 400 glasses "
— of which one would like to know more — sixteen cloths of
"frize,** fifteen gross of cutlery, about three-and-half tons of
tin, and a few dozen barrels of **saime" (lard). It will be
seen from this summary that the whole of one year's car-
goes into and out of the port could be stowed in one
moderate sized steamer of the present day.
To return to the Mayor's account. As the total was greatly
below the rent of £120 received from the corporation and the
butchers forty years before, the Escheator was surcharged about
£S4 by the Exchequer oflBcials, whereupon he produced a lengthy
explanation, declaring that the estate produced nothing beyond
the amount paid in, and that, as regarded £4 of the deficiency,
the money was " now " paid directly into the Treasury by the
tenants. One of the plots over which he had thus lost control
had been leased by Anne, Queen of Eichard II., for a term of
sixty years, at the annual rent of 68. 8d., and, if Mr. Bush's
copyist may be trusted, it is described in the following strange
Notes on the Commerce of Bristol. 221
manner in the mayor's appeal. It was " a place in St. Mary's
Street, opposite the church of the Blessed Peter, between the
street which leads towards Wynchester, called Winchester street,
and extending itself towards the house of William Poynty, late
lessee of Simon Oliver, of Bristol." After five years consideration
of the case, the King's servants found that they could not justly
demand more from the Mayor, and Henry VI.. by a writ of privy
seal, ordered that he should be fully acquitted and discharged.
In the meantime, on the 29th May, 1439, the Crown had granted
the corporation a new lease of the estate for a term of twenty
years at a rent of i>160. Out of this sum ±14 10s. were to be
paid to the abbey of Tewkesbury for the tithes of the town, under
the grant of William, Earl of Gloucester ; i*3 to the priory of St.
James for the annual rent of a mill, and £89 14s. 6d. to the
constable, porter, and watchman of the Castle and to the
Forester of Kingswood.
It may seem strange that the corporation should have offered
a rent of £160 for an estate which produced much less than two
thirds of that amount. But Bristolians have never been charged
with being bad hands at a bargain, and the civic rulers probably
foresaw that the value of the property would largely increase
with the growth of local trade and population. So anxious were
they to retain what they had got that, before one third of the
time named in the lease had expired, they sought for and obtained
another demise for an additional term of sixty years, and, after a
few years' further experience, in February, 1462, they were
successful in securing from Edward IV. a grant of the estate " for
ever " at the old rent, the King reserving, as usual, only the
Castle and its moat.
In consequence of this arrangement, the sheriff of the town,
whose duties in mediceval times were much more financial than
judicial, became charged with the collection of the rents, customs
and court fees, on behalf of the civic body. But instead of the
revenue being paid over to the chamberlain, and administered by
the Common Council, it was dealt with by the sheriff himself, who
became a sort of supplementary treasurer, and who ultimately
found to his cost that such a position had its inconveniences,
especially when the corporate treasury had run dry. The pay-
ment of the king's rent must have long absorbed the sheriff's
ordinary receipts ; but commerce, and consequently the customs
222 Clifton A7itiqnarian Club.
dues, developed after the discovery of America, and it became
usual to draw upon the unfortunate official for a variety of
objects. He was required to pay the mayor's salary, to rig out
the chief magistrate and the staff of corporate officers with their
robes and "furs," and to provide the outlay for numerous
drinking feasts and merry makings. One abuse was the stepping
stone to another, as is usual in such cases, and the burden at
last became too intolerable for endurance, for in 1520 or there-
abouts^ William Dale, who had just borne the costly office,
brought matters to a crisis by producing a detailed account of
his grievances which is reproduced below. The sheriffs, in fact,
had come to be regarded as milch cows, at which the whole
corporate body could suck with impunity. They paid the wages
of the guardians of the town gates, of the quay wardens, and of
the ** midsummer watch." The recorder, town clerk, steward,
town attorney and swordbearer came to them for their yearly
fees, and for their annual new fur robes, some being decked out
twice in the twelvemonth. The chamberlain, the ** waterbaylley,"
even the town clerk's clerk, the ** wayts of the towne " and the
clerk of the market expected " gownes " at their hands. The
cost of the paper and parchment used in the city offices came out
of their pockets. The chapel of St. George in the Guildhall
was served by a priest, and the Common Council, arranging
matters with the liberality for which the human race is remark-
able when it disposes of the property of others, sent him to the
sheriffs to receive a handsome salary and a yearly fitting attire.
The clock of St. Nicholas was kept in order, and "Spencer's obit"
was duly observed with the help of twenty priests and numberless
friars, at the cost of the sheriffs, although the Common Council
held property specifically charged with both expenditures. Then
the corporate body had several " drinkings " at stated festivals,
and a tun of wine was given yearly to the crafts of the town, all
at the expense of the sheriffs. After providing for minstrels,
town waits, bellmen, and other ornamental appendages, the
sheriffs were expected to furnish the public with entertainments
in the shape of two exhibitions of wrestling (with more wine), a
» Mr. Bush states that Dale was elected a sheriff in ** 1518, 9th of Henty Yin."
But the election of 1518 was in the 10th year of the King. Price makes Dale's
appointment occur in 1519, so that his complaint could not have been made until
the 12th of Henry VIII.
Notes on the Commerce of Bristol. 223
bear baiting, and a concert by the King and Queen's minstrels ;
and finally, there were charges to bear for the " four orders of
friars/' the prisoners in Newgate, and the " knights of the
shire " for Bristol, who pocketed d610 each session. The entire
outlay of the well fleeced victims was about d£380, towards which
there was no provision, complains Sheriff Dale, but the income
arising from the old estate of the Crown, averaging about d£173,
and a grant from the civic purse of £60. "And so the said
shrives be charged," he adds, with a balance of nearly i^l50, to
say nothing of the expenses of ** the household and appayrell of
theym and their wives," which was, '* by estimacion," de240, a
sum equivalent to about £3,000 in modem currency.
This weighty complaint, says Mr. Bush, " was enquired into
in October 1519 (? 1520), when it was resolved that the revenues
of the sheriffs should be increased ; " and the " obits " previously
received by the Mayor, together with the profits of the quay and
back, were added to their former income. The " profits "
referred to consisted of a toll on ships and merchandise, granted
by Henry VI., for the specific purpose of "repairing and
mending as well the walls of the key as of the other walls
and pavements of the same town." Mr. Bush contended that
this appropriation of dues imposed for special purposes — which
continued until his time with certain modifications — was utterly
illegal, but he need not be followed into a controversy of which
the interest has passed away. A few brief extracts may, how-
ever, be made from the " table of rates due unto the sheriffs for
their custom and murage, keelage and keyage," which was agreed
to shortly after the action of Sheriff Dale. The charge was
generally about twopence in the pound on the value of the goods,
the names of some of which show the advance that commerce
had made within the previous hundred years. The mere men-
tion of " Brazelwood " marks a revolution ; and equally eloquent
are " silk and raw silk," " permiceta," " Flander's nails,"
" knives of Almond " [Germany] , " lignum vitaB," " nutmegs,"
" mace," " ivory," " cordewan skins," " currants," "muscadyne
malasses " [a wine] , " pomgarnatts," and " cloth of gold." Not
the least suggestive items, however, are " Primmers, the gross or
dozen," and " Manchester cottons, the piece," items which could
have added little to the income of the sheriffs, but which presaged
improvements in the intellectual and social condition of the
224 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
nation which even the contemporary author of " Utopia " could
never have foreseen.
The new arrangement made for the benefit of the sheriffs had
lasted only about a quarter of a century when the discontent of
the inhabitants became too serious to be ignored. Biots took
place in consequence of the tolls demanded on the quays and at
the city gates, and after a remonstrance addressed to the corpora-
tion by the vestries, the Common Council appointed a committee
to negotiate with the ratepayers, and investigate the returns of
the tolls. In the result a corporate " ordinance " was proclaimed
at the High Cross on the 15th June, 1546, announcing to the
citizens that the Council had ordered the entire abolition of the
tolls on goods and Uve stock demanded at the gates, and also of
the dues paid on cattle, grain, fresh fish, butter, poultry, flannel,
yarn and wool, brought to the quays. It had been found that the
average receipts from those sources during the previous ten years
had been about i£45, and the Council stated that it would pay
<£44 yearly to the sheriffs, and make some other slight changes
by which the compensation would be raised to £50. The pro-
clamation was totally silent respecting the remarkable transaction
which had brought about this pretended hberality. The fact is
that the parochial vestries had proffered, if the tolls were dealt
with in the manner just described, to make the Corporation a
present of the plate of their respective churches, a gift producing,
as the Council admitted in another proclamation thirteen years
later, the then enormous sum of £'523 10s. 8d. At the current
high rate of interest, the Corporation could in no case have lost
anything by an arrangement upon which it set up a claim to public
gratitude. It really profited to an extent which it is diflScult to
exaggerate. By selling the plate and adding about £470 from
the city chest it was enabled to buy from Henry VIIL the '* late
hospitall or house of St. Mark, otherwise called the Gaunts,*'
together with the Church, nearly all the wide lands belonging to
the institution, and a great deal of property previously held by
the monastery of Athelney, the priory of St. Mary Magdalen,
and the black, grey, and white friaries of Bristol. The king's
deed of gift transferring this magnificent estate^ is given by Mr.
3 Two rural manors and valuable estates in Bristol were alienated at an early
period. About fifty years ago further portions wore sold for upwards of £70,000.
The remainder still produces a considerable rental.
r9m
IVOTHHip^
nr
tmm
■v^
Notes on the Commerce of Bristol, 225
Bash, as well as one of the bonds of indemnity received by the
vestries from the Corporation, and they are amongst the most
curious and instructive features of his collection. Many other
interesting documents must be passed over without remark. All
that need be added at present is that the sheriffs continued to
collect the duties on general merchandise until 1640, when, says
our informant, a receiver was appointed by the Council, which
granted a fixed yearly sum to the former collectors. In 1770
the income from the Town Dues was still only i*500 18s. 8d.,
but the gross receipts of 1810, according to Mr. Bush's
calculation, were upwards of iJ5,000. The annual income had
risen to about j£5,500 in 1825, when a reduction took place
under an Act obtained for the purpose.
The only alteration made in the following account is the
substitution of Arabic for Boman numerals, which would have
puzzled ordinary readers and considerably increased the length
of the letter press. As is customary in old documents, there are
some errors in the additions — a venial fault considering the
difficulties of the Boman numeration.
Vic. Bristol
The Charges borne by the Shreves of BristoU to the King's
-, Grce for his fee feme [farm] and discharge of their Account
[in theschequer : —
First for the fee feme in the Eling's Exchequer . .
Item to thabbot of Tewkesbury
Item to the Priour of Saynt Jamys
Item to the Constable, Porter & Waccheman of the Castell
Item to the ffossters of Kingeswood
Soma £160 Os. lid.
Item for the Pfres at Michelmas in thexchequer
Item for wrytyng of the same . .
Item for wax and wyne
Item for a box and sendyng up the same
Soma £3 Gs. 6d.
Item for the Pfres at Ester
Item for a vewe of accompte . .
Item for wryting of the same . .
Item for waxe to seale the same and wyne
Item for a box and sendyng up of the same
Item for making of their yeres accompte
Soma £10 10s. Id.
102 15
6
14 10
3
28 7
34
11 8
li
3 3
2
1
2
4
a 1
8
5
2
1
2
4
8
Soma total of the said fee ferme wt the charges above wryten
Th Expences of the Shreves, and charges of them, their
housholds, apparell and officers : —
Imprimis of the Shrcvcs 4 wayting men at 40s. a pese
173 16 6
8
2
2
10
8
44 12 6
226 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Item for the Wages of the 5 porters at the 6 gats that is to say —
Newgate, 40b., Bedcllf gate 26e. 8d. Tempill gate d3s. 4d. ^ 7
Frome gate 208. Pety gate 20s.
Item to the keper of the Key for his wages
Item to the keper of the backe for his wages
Item for the wynter livery of the sayd officers
Item for the somer lyvery for the same officers
Soma £88 Os. Od.
* Item for the bothe Shreves expensis and costs of houshold and i
thapparell of theyme and their Wyves by estymacion at the lest (
The Costs payd by the Shreves to the Mayer and his Officers :—
Imprimis to the Mayr yerly for his pension £20. for 12 yards so€ur-
lett £8. the furre £6 ISs 4d, for wyne £3 6s 8d. for mynstrells )
£3 6s 8d. for two torches 13s 4d. for the Comission of the (
Staple Gourte 228 6d. for i Scabards {^v^ SOs. Som. . . ^
Whiche in oonscien& ought to be discharged [by the Chamber ? ]
* Item the Mayer hath more for certayne obits in the Towne, 6s 8d .
at ev'y obite and for making of burgeses in the Staple Courte /
and certayne fisshe of ev*y bote of fiishe whiche by estima- 1
cion may yerely be worthe besides his sedile (salary ?) )
Item the Sword berer for his pension £8. his furre 6s 8d. his somer \
gowne 18s 4d two hatt 408 for a wynter gowne of 6 broad > 7 16
yards at 6s the yard. Som 36s . . . . . . )
And besides this the Swordberer hath to his advantage all
wepon that is drawen in afErays and pfits at obite and '
otherways
Item to the Meyer is 4 Sejaunts 4 gowns conteying 18 yards at 5s.
the yard amounting to £4. 10s. Whiche Swordberer and 4
Sejaunts been the Mair is daylly Sevaunts, and he ought in con-
science to here the charges of their wages and livery . .
13 6 8
4 10
Soma totalis to the Meyre and his housholds Sevaunts . . . . 56 18 6
Item to the Kecorder for his fee £10. for 10 yards soarlett £6. 13s 4d ) ig 13 4
for his fure £3. Som. . . . . (
Which of good conscience ought to be borne and payed by
the Chambre of the sayd Towne.
Item to the Town Clarke for his fee £4. his fur 6s 8d. for parch- \
ment wax and wyne 208. for two lawe days 68 8d. a gowne of V 7 9 4
6 brode yards at 6s. the yard amount to 36s. Som . . )
It for 10 querys of paper for hym at Michael mas, ft 2 forells
and a bagge .. 038
It for 4 brode yards of clothe for his Clarke at 48. the yard . . 16
Which charges so payd to the Towne Clarke and his Clarke.
Which Towne Clarke hath besides the said fee and other
p'mysses the p'fits of the Meyers Court and other p*fit8
worthe £40 a yere or ther abouts
Item to the Steward for his fee £3. for his furre 6s 8d. for parche- \
ment, paper and wyne 9b 4d and a gowne of 5 brode yeurds at > 5 6
68 the yard 308. . . . . . . . . )
* A pen has been drawn throngh these two items in the original document, obviously because
they are not included in the total shown at the foot.
Notes on the Commerce of Bristol, 227
S 16 8
8
It for 10 queyres of paper for him at Michaelmas wt two forells
and a bagge .. .. .. ... .. >. 083
It for 4 brode yards of clothe for his Clarke at 4s. the yard . . 16
Which Steward hath besids his sayd fee and other the
p^mysses the p'fits of the Shreves Court beying yerly
worthe £80 or therabouts
Item to the Towne is Attorney for his fee £8. his fur 66 8d. a )
gowne of 5 brode yards at 68 the yard 808. Som . . (
Whiche of conscience the Chambre ought to here for as
moche as he is the Towne is Attorney and dothe no sevioe
unto the Shreves
Item he hathe besids that of the Shreves for under Shreveship for .
his fee iOs. besids the p'fits for brekjmg of the Kings writts r
directed to the Shreves, which is by estimacion worthe £6 i
k/Om •. .• .« .• .. •• '
It to the Chamberlayne a gowne of 5 brode yards at 6s the yard
Som •• .• .. >• .• >. •• 1 10
Which the Chambre ought to bere for so moche as he is the
officer thereof
Item to the Prest of Seynt George for his wages £6. 6s 8d. and a | 7 16 8
gowne of 5 brode yards at 6s the yard SOs. Som . . . . i
Whiche the Chambre ought to bere and pay for so moche
as they have the land that was geven for mayntennce of the
same.
Item to the Waterbaylley a gowne of 4 brode yards and a half at 58
the yard .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 126
Whiche Waterbaylley doth imto the Shrieves no manner of
Be vice
Item to the 8 Wayts of the Towne at Seynt Greorge is tide 6s 8d. at
Midsomer for their wayt3nig upon the Meyer 208. at Mighel-
mas 3s. and 8 gownys conteyning 12 yards at 4s. the yard 488.
Whiche the Chambre ought to pay
Item to the Clerke of the Market a gowne of 4 brode yards at 4s. of
the yard . . . . 16
Which the Mayer ought to pay
Item for Spiceis obite to the Mayer 6s. 8d. to the Shreves 4s. to ^
the Towne Clarke 8s 4d. to the Meyres 4 Serjaimts 16d. to 20
Prests 6s. 8d. to the 4 orders of freres ISs. 4d. to the vicar of
Seynt Nycolas for light 8s for ryngyng the bells 48. to the
belman 4s. (? 4d.) for bred to be delt to pore peple 80s 4d.
jjvm •• ••' •• •• ■• •• ••
Whiche the Chambre ought to pay for so moche as they
have the lond that was given for mayntennce thereof.
Item for keepyng of Seynt Nycolas Olocke . . . . . . 16 8
Which the Chambre ought to pay for they have lends
therefor.
Item for ryngyng of the common bell on Seynt Michaells is day 4
Which the Mayor ought to pay
Item for 6 torches at Seynt Qeorges 208. and drynkyng at the same
f est £5.. .. .. .. .. .. •• 600
For the whiche the Chambre ought to pay
8 17 8
8 18
228
Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Itemfordrynkyngat Gristmas to bothe Shreves i&13. 6e. 8d. Which )
was not kepte this yere . . . . . . . . . . )
Whiche may be fordone for ever.
Item for diynk3mg at Trynetie Chapell . .
Item for the Costs at Sessions of Gaole . .
Whiche may be lefte
Item for the Meyer is drynkyng at the Tolzey on Seynt Nicolas day
Which the Meyre ought to pay
Item for the Wrestlying at Seynt laurence afore the Mayor 6s 8d. )
and for perys and wyne there 13s 4d Som . . . . /
Which may be lefte or else the Mayor ought to pay therefor
Item for Wrestlyng at Seynt Jamys tyde before the Mayer
Item for Bere betyngs before the Mayer. . ....
Which may be lefte
Item to the Kyngs and Quenes Mynstrells
Item to the Messengers of the Kyngs Eschequer
Item for a Sermon at Seynt Augustynes the Wednesday in Ester
Weke
■ « ^^^ •• •• •• ■■ ■• ■• ««
Which the Ghambre ought to pay for they have the land
given therefor.
Item to the 4 Orders of fireres . .
Which the Ghambre ought to pay
Item for the Gharges of Midsomer wacche of both the Shreves by
estimacon . .
Item for a Ton of Wyne that tyme to the Grafts of the Town
Itom for bryngyng up of prysoners from Newgate comonly ev*y yere
Itom to the Knyghts of the Shire of Bristol! for going to the Fila-
ment when tyme requyreth for their expenses
Som total of the payments £878 4s. 5d. |
p lib". Major i
And the said Shreves have none other certayne for the said fee ^
ferme and costos of the scmie but only the Kyngs toll and
st3nding in the Stretes at Seynt James feyre wt fyncs and
forfeytures and other like casualties which dothe comonly
amount to the yerely value of £160 10s 8d. that is to say
from Michaelmas to Gristmsbs £25 4s. from Gristmas to
Ester £66 from Ester to Midsomer £18 6s. 8d. and from
Midsomer to Michaelmas £56. Item more that the Shreves
resceyve yerly for the KyngesGoeJe or Prison £12. Som
totales of the recepts
Item more they do yerely resceyve out of the Ghambre . .
Som of the total receipts £232 10s 8d
And so the said Shreves be charged above the foresaid recepts with i
the payment of Som of £145. 12s. 9d. Besids their houshold /
and appayrell of theym and their wives as is above wryten . . '
13 6
8
2
6
5
1
6
8
10
10
18
4
6 8
1 12
20
4 18
4
6
10
347 h\
172 10 8
p. lib™. Major
296 17 8
60
145 12 9
Catalogue of some Remarkable Copes. 229
% Sesmpttbe Catalogue of some
iiemarlkaible Copes*
By the Hon. and Rev. WALTER I. CLIFFORD, S.J.
{Read December 20M, 1887.)
Coloured drawings, photographs, engravings, and other illus-
trations of the Copes described below were exhibited by the
author at the meeting of the Club.
Cope, Lat. cappa, pluviale, Sax. cwppey a mantle of semi-
circular form, enveloping the wearer from the neck to the feet, or
nearly down to the ankles. The radius varies by some inches
in different specimens, over or under five feet.
No. 1. — German Work. Engraved and described by Gerbert,
in his work Vetus lAturgia Alemannica^ where it is called a
"casula" {chasuble,) The Orphrey, Hood and Morse are want-
ing. Bordtire broad ; has in it thirty-five circles, each containing
a bust figure. Prophets, Apostles, Emperors, &c., name attached
to each. Body, divided into squares by ornamented bands,
containing scriptural subjects and figures of Saints.
No. 2. — Engraved and described in the same book as No. 1.
German work. This also Gerbert calls a " casula.*' No Hood,
nor Morse, nor Bordure. Orphrey, only down the middle of the
back, with figures in nine circles. Body, in squares, containing
subjects from the life of our Lord, and of St. Nicholas. Figures
of four Prophets and four Evangelists. Thirty-six Latin couplets,
or verses, descriptive of the subjects : several inscriptions,
quotations, &c.
' Vetua Liturgia AUmannica. Author, Dr. Martin Gerbert, Abbot of the
Monastery of St. Blaize, in the Black Forest. Part I, Dlsq. Ill, •* De Vestibu^
Bacris, cap. iii. — 1776.
230 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
No. 8. — From the same book as Nos. 1 and 2. German work.
Gerbert calls it '' magna haec cappa, seu, ut vocant, plaviale."
Kood, moveable, quadrangular, embroidered with figures of
St. Blaise and St. Nicholas; a lion and a dragon. Morse,
embroidered with a bust figure of our Lord, and a half-length
figure of St. Nicholas. Orphrey, only down the middle of the
back, bearing patterns in the North German style. Bordure, very
narrow. Body, in circles, with various foliated ornaments
occupying the intervals between the circles. The circles contain
subjects from the lives of St. Blaise and St. Vincent. Forty-six
Latin couplets, or verses, are inscribed in Roman capitals on the
frames of the circles The original Cope, according to Dr. Bock,
is, or not long ago was, preserved in the Monastery of St. Paul,
in Garinthia.
No. 4. — German work, 14th century. Now in the textile
collection at the South Kensington Museum, S.W. Em-
broidered throughout in various coloured silks and some gold,
on coarse linen or canvas. Hood, extremely small, triangular,
with intricate North German pattern. Orphrey, both along the
straight edge and down the middle of the back, bearing the
North German patterns. Rather deep fringe of various coloured
silks, instead of Bordure, Body, groups representing martyrdoms
of various saints are worked on grounds alternately red and
green, m irregular shaped compartments, divided from each other
by shuttle-shaped spaces, each bearing a blue-and-red dragon,
and united to one another by a rose of gold thread. In the
drawing of the original design these compartments and
borders were probably formed by intersecting circles — the
present effect being produced by distortion in the working, and
material.
No. 5. — German work. Now kept at the Cathedral of Anagni,
Italy. Belonged to Pope Boniface VIII., (Benedetto Gaetani), a
native of Anagni. Date of his Pontificate 1294-1808. It has
been cut up ; some portions made up into a chasuble ; others
combined with parts of another Cope (No. 10, below) to form two
Dalmatics ; other fragments remaining detached. The Body was
divided into circles, containing subjects from the life of St.
Nicholas. Graceful conventional foliations occupy the intervals
— some remaining portions of Orphrey show North German
patterns.
Catalogue of some Remarkable Copes. 231
No. 6. — German work (?) Late 13th century. Kept at the
same place as No. 6. Also belonged to Pope Boniface VIII.
No Orphreyy nor Morse. Narrow fringe instead of Bordure.
Body, unmutilated ; circles, containing subjects from the life
of our Blessed Lord and of His Blessed Mother. Figures,
very numerous. In the intervals between the circles are Angels,
kneeling on one knee, bearing thuribles and other objects.
No. 7. — French work (?) Late 13th century. Called " the
Cope of St. Louis, Bishop of Toulouse.'* Kept at the church of
St. Maximin, Yar. St. Louis was born 1274, consecrated Bishop
at the age of 22 by Pope Boniface VIII., died 1297. This Cope
has been mutilated by having a width of some inches cut out
down the middle of the back. The divided halves have been
stitched together again down the middle. No Hood, Orphrey,
Bordure, nor Morse. Body, quasi-circles, irregularly formed,
containing subjects from the life of Christ, and of the Blessed
Virgin. Figures, very numerous. Some angelic and cherubic
figures occur in the intervals outside the circles. This Cope has
been described at much length in a folio pamphlet by M. L.
Rostan, illustrated with very finely executed line engravings
drawn by his brother, M. Ph. Rostan.* " Le fond en est tiss^
d*or sur toile, et les sujets brod^s en soie de diverses couleurs."
No. 8. — English work. Now in the possession of the Rev. F. H.
Van Doorne, Corpus Christi House, Brixton Rise. Has been cut to
pieces, and some, parts made up into a chasiible. A few years
ago it was kept, stowed away in its mutilated condition, at
the CathoUc Church of Havant, Hampshire. No Hood, nor
Morse, nor Bordure. A narrow green velvet (or plush?)
Orphrey, with half-length figures of angels in barbed quatrefoils,
does not seem to have been part of the original Cope. Body,
crimson silk ; a vine, embroidered in green silk, some of the
leaves being of various colours, rises from the recumbent sleeping
figure of Jesse. Two stems spring from the stock, and, inter-
twining, form three compartments of a '^ vesica " shape, one
above the other, up the middle of the back. In these are seated
figures of DAVIT, SALAMON, and the Blessed Virgin bearing a
sceptre, and having the Divine Child standing on her left knee.
From these two stems lateral branches spread out on both sides
in graceful convolutions, among which stand several figures of
' GhaloQ-sur-Soane, Imprimerie de J. Dejussieu, Rue du Ghatelet, 14, 1885.
232 Clifton Antiquarian Clnb.
kings and prophets, wrought in gold thread and various coloured
silks, each figure bearing a scroll, with name.
No. 9. — English work. 14th Century. Now kept at the Eectory,
Steeple Aston, near Heyford, Oxfordshire. This Cope has been cut
up ; one large, rectangular piece remains entire ; other portions
have been patched together, to make up an antependium, the
only two remaining parts of the Orphrey being put at the ends of
the mitependium as borderings. These two large rectangular
pieces of work used to hang high up under the roof of the Chancel
of Steeple Aston Church. Some time since some members of an
Archaeological Society obtained permission to have them taken
down for inspection. The work has got very much faded and
discoloured and is become very fragile. No Hood, nor Morse,
unless a fragment which has been stitched on, quite out of
place, may have been part of one or the other. It bears a sexfoil
inscribed within a circle, enclosing the Lamb and Flag. Outside
the circle, as if in the four corners of a square, are the four
evangelistic symbols. The subjects on the portions of the
Orphrey which remain are curious, angels mounted astride on
horseback, playing, one a violin, another on a guitar. Barbed
quatrefoils, containing various beasts, birds, fishes, &c. The
Bordure is wide, and divided into minute compartments with
various kinds of beasts alternating with a conventional leaf scroll.
Body, rich ribbed silk, at present of a much obscured creamy-
white colour. Dr. Rock suggests that it may have faded from a
rosy tint. Branches, alternately of oak and ivy, in gold, are
arranged so as to form compartments of a kind of quatrefoil
shape, containing groups — The carrying of the cross, Crucifixion,
our Lord enthroned with the Blessed Virgin on the same throne
on His right, Martyrdoms of Apostles and others. The figures
are wrought in gold thread and various coloured silks. Li the
intervals, quasi-heraldic lions, in gold. Very quaint faces at
certain points.
No. 10. — English work. 13th century (?) [Illustrated by Lady
Alford, plate 60].* Kept at Anagni. Belonged to Boniface VIII.
Has been cut up. Some parts combined with parts of No. 5 (which
see), to make two Dalmatics. No Hood, nor Morse, nor Bordure,
Body, barbed quatrefoil compartments, with rather broad borders
in gold, containing groups representing martyrdoms, and, in
3 Needlework as Art, London, 1886.
Catalogue of some Remarkable Copes. 233
some cases^ single figures of saints. Amongst them occur
the Martyrdom of St. Thomas of Canterbury, and that of St.
Edmund, King and martyr, decapitated at the foot of the tree to
which he had been bound to be pierced with arrows. The wolf
guarding the severed head according to the tradition. St.
(George, being sawn in two ; and others. Ground, some kind of
cloth of gold ; most of the gold worn away, leaving a coarse
canvas. Embroidery in various coloured silks.
No. 11. — ^English work. 18th and 14th Centuries. [Lady
Alford, plate 59] • Had been kept at Daroca College, in Spain.
Was exhibited at the " Iberian " Loan Exhibition, at South
Kensington, in 1881. Whilst there it was photographed. Since
its return to Spain it has been, according to Lady Marion Alford,
entirely destroyed by fire. No Hood, nor Morse, nor Bordure. A
series of Gothic canopies in coloured silks, with twists instead of
pillars, in which stand, against a diapered gold ground. Episcopal
and regal figures. Body, the ground is silver tissue, with a
curious wavy pattern, like conventional clouds, in gold. The
subjects are in barbed quatrefoils, with broad borders in gold.
Each of the curved extremities of the quatrefoil is bound to one of
those of the neighbouring quatrefoil by a knot of four serpents,
each serpent having a projecting, dragon-like head. The three
subjects up the centre of the back are — The Annunciation, the
Crucifixion, and Christ Enthroned, receiving the homage of
Angels. The other groups are mostly from the works of Creation,
the Fall, Expulsion, &c., and a fine half-length ''Majesty." In the
intervals between the compartments are standing figures of
^angels, and six- winged cherubim or seraphs. All the figures are
in gold or coloured silks.
No. 12.—" The Sion Cope." English work. 18th Century.
Now shown at the South Kensington Museum.^ Once belonged
to the convent of Bridgettine Nuns, founded by Henry Y., in 1414,
on the banks of the Thames, at Isleworth, near London. A long
dissertation, with minute description of this Cope, is given by
Dr. Bock, in his Textile Fabrics. Hood, missing, but the loops
remain by which it was attached. Morse, embroidered in the
same style as the Orphrey. Bordure, small heraldic shields in
4 This Cope is figured by Lady AUord, plate 67, and a part of the Orphrey, on
a larger scale, in the South Kensington Museum Handbook, Industrial Arts,
p. 268.
6
234 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the same style. Orphrey^ large heraldic shields in more recent
style than the hody of the Cope. Dr. Eock mentions the
different families to whom the armorial bearings belonged.
Body^ mutilated at edges, both straight and curved. Compart-
ments of barbed-quatrefoil form, the four curved extremities
of each interlaced with those of adjoining quatrefoils. Back
ground embroidered throughout on coarse linen or canvas;
inside the quatrefoils red, the intervals green. Some of the
compartments contain groups, others single figures; in the
intervals are angels and six- winged seraphs, the latter standing
on wheels. Two donors (?) are represented kneeling, one a
cleric, the other a layman. Life of Christ, Death of Blessed
Virgin, figures of apostles and others. In varied silks and gold.
No. 18.—" Of St. Sylvester." EngUsh. Late 13th Century.
Kept at the Basilica of San Giovanni in Laterano, Borne.
Hood very small, triangular, two sides curved ; embroidered with
two wyvems. Morses embroidered. No Bordure. Orphrey,
Christ seated in majesty, in the centre. Six very graceful
Gothic canopies, under which three bishops and three queens
(or kings *). Li the four intervals, single figures of angels, each
accompanied by a small representation of the evangelistic
symbols. Body, three rows of very elaborate Gothic canopies —
thirteen in the lowest, eight in the middle, four single and one
double central one in the top row. In the centre of the middle
row is a compartment with ornamental framing specially shaped
to accommodate the group of the Crucifixion. In the canopied
compartments are groups from the life of Christ, and that of the
Blessed Virgin, and some martyrdoms of saints. In the
spandrels of the canopy arches are angels, enthroned, playing
musical instruments, &c. The arches of the canopies are sup-
ported on twists instead of pillars, and in place of capitals are
eight pointed shields, each bearing a different kind of bird. In
the two spandrels of the top centre subject (Christ enthroned,
with His mother at His side) are the Pelican " in its piety " and
5 This Cope is described by Mr. J. T. Mioklelhwaite, F.S.A., in the Proceedings
of the Society of Antiquaries^ N, Ser, xi. 399, as of undoubted English work,
among the subjects represented on it being the martyrdoms of the English
Saints, " St. Edmund the King," and ** St. Thomas the Martjrr." He describes
the Orphrey as having in the middle a small figure of our Lord, seated, the side
niches containing figures of bishops and kings. See also plates 56 and 67 in
Lady Alford's Needlework as Art, — Ed.
Catalogue of some Remarkable Copes. 235
the Phoenix, rising from the flames. The back-ground through-
out is minutely diapered (in gold ?) and the figures, which are
very numerous, are worked in various coloured silks and gold (?)
No. 14. — ^English work. A.D. 1424. Photographed from a large
coloured drawing said to have been executed about two centuries
ago, when it is supposed that the original Cope was preserved in
the sacristy of St. Peter's, Rome. Within the last few years, how-
ever, diligent enquiries have been made in Rome, and no tidings of
it have been obtained. The large coloured drawing of it was
purchased in 1878 (?) from a Canterbury (bookseller?) by Mr. Joseph
Meyer, of Pennant House, Bebington, Cheshire, Hood, very
small, triangular, worked with patterns. No Morse, nor Bordure,
Orphrey, Italian renaissance style, quite different from the rest of
the Cope. Seven circles ; in the central one half-length of the
Madonna with Holy Child ; in each of the other six a half-length
figure of St. Peter, St. John the Evangelist, &c. In the
intervening spaces some elaborate rococo scroll-work, conventional
foliations, &c. Body, three rows of very peculiarly constructed
Gothic canopies, thirteen in the lowest row, nine in the middle
one, four and a central double one in the top row, groups
illustrating the life of Our Lord and of Our Lady. In the
spandrels over the lowest row, single figures and groups relating
to the Creation, Fall, Expulsion, Cain and Abel, Noah con-
structing the Ark, &c. In those above the middle row. Angels,
Seraphs, &c.
No. 15. English Work (?) 13th Century. [Lady Alford, plate
58] . Kept in the Museo Civico, Bologna, Italy. Hood, very small
(if any ?). No Morse, nor Bordnire, nor Orphrey. Body, two
rows of Gothic canopies, twelve in lower, seven in upper row,
containing groups of subjects from the New Testament. One
compartment has the martyrdom of St. Thomas, of Canterbury.
In the spandrels, half-length figures of angels rising from
the clouds. Above the lower row of canopies a broad band
containing a series of small eight-pointed compartments, in each
of which (twenty-one complete, two half) is a head of some
sacred personage. Above the upper row is a similar band, with
eight complete and two half compartments of same form with
heads.
No. 16. — English Work (?) 15th Century. Recently destroyed.
"Of Pius II." (Bartolomeo Piccolomini, "-3Bneas Silvius,"
236 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Pontificate 1458-1464). Now kept in the Palazzo Piccolomini,
at the native town of Pius II., Pienza, near Siena. A short
paragraph in the St. James's Gazette^ of Friday, April 18th, 1884,
contains the following :....'' The material was gold brocade,
covered with wonderful designs carried out in needlework ....
The whole was adorned with pearls and precious stones, the
value of which alone was estimated at about £80,000. At his
death the Pope bequeathed this vestment to his native town.
One night last month the Cope was stolen from the treasury of
Pienza ; and a few days ago it was discovered in the shop of
a dealer in antiquities in Florence, but completely stripped of its
pearls and precious stones, and some of its more valuable
embroidery '* A very clear and distinct photograph of the
whole Cope has been taken since the robbery, by Cavaliere
Lombardi, of Siena, in which there are no traces of damage,
except in one place where the work seems to have got worn
through, and a rather small patch of quite different material has
been put in. Hood, very small, triangular, two sides curved,
embroidered with two six-winged seraphs. Morse, embroidered,
with foliations. Bordure, a series of alternate interlaced
quatrefoils and eight-pointed figures ; the former, about seventy-
nine in number, each containing a bird or beast; the latter
enclosing various devicea Orphrey, a series of quatrefoils and
semi-quatrefoils interlaced, and enclosing a multitude of con-
ventional animals and beautifully executed natural birds of
immense variety. Body, three rows of elaborate Gothic canopies
— ^thirteen in the lowest row, nine in the middle row, four and a
central double one in the top row. Two intertwined serpents
take the place of columns, their heads forming a kind of base —
no capitals — ^in the lowest row. In the two other rows the twists
spring from grotesque heads. In the lowest row of compartments
are subjects from the lives of St. Margaret and St. Catherine, of
Alexandria. In the other rows from the lives of Our Lord and of
the Blessed Virgin. In each of the spandrels over the lowest
row of arches is an apostle with a scroll inscribed with an article
from the Apostles' Creed. In those above the second row are
kings and prophets, ancestors of Our Lord, David, Solomon, and
others. In the half spandrel at each end of each row is a bird.
No. 17. — ^English Work. Late 14th or early 15th Century.
Cut to pieces. Parts made up into Chasvhle, Stole, and
Catalogue of some Remarkable Copes. 237
ManvpU^ which, with some detached scraps, were formerly kept
at Mount St. Mary's College, Eckington, near Chesterfield.
Other portions, combined with scraps of which the material and
work were quite of a different sort, were made up into an
antependium, which was kept at Southgate House, near Barlbro
(a few miles from the above named College), the residence of the
Bowden family. All the parts, except some which are missing,
have been arranged more or less in their original positions, and
stitched upon a strong cotton sheeting, the design having been
carried out through the vacant spaces in water colour, painted
on the sheeting. The whole is now in the possession of the
Bowden family at Pleasington, near Blackburn, Lancashire.
Hood, missing, except perhaps two small fragments on which are
worked half figures of angels issuing horizontally from the clouds,
and swinging thuribles ; back-ground gold, with diaper pattern.
No MoTBe. Bordure, gold ground, wrought with two alternating
scroll patterns of conventional flowering sprigs, divided by sexfoil
rosettes in seed-pearls. Orphrey, gold ground, variously diapered
with leopards, spread eagles, fleurs-deJys, trefoils, &c. Eight
Gothic canopies or tabernacles of beautiful design, a standing
figure. Archbishop, Bishop, Queen, &c., under each canopy. All
wrought in various coloured silks with some gold. Body, rich ruby
velvet. In his " Textile Fabrics " Dr. Rock has the following —
*' Velvet is a silken textile, the history of which has still to
be written. Of the country whence it first came, of the people
who were the earliest to hit upon the happy way of weaving it,
we know nothing. The oldest piece we remember to have ever
seen was in the beautiful crimson Cope, embroidered by English
hands in the fourteenth century, now kept at the College of Mount
St. Mary, Chesterfield " Three rows ofgraceful and elaborate
Gothic canopies, with crockets, finials and numerous cusps, the
most prominent of which are tipped with two oak-leaves and an
acorn. Twists with oak-leaves, and acorns take the place of
pillars. A golden lion recumbent on a flowery green bank,
at base, in lowest row. Instead of a capital, a head of a kind of
monster, "homed" and " langued." In each compartment is
a single standing figure, apostles, male and female saints, but
the three double compartments up the centre of the back
have the Annunciation, Adoration of the Magi, and Christ with
the Blessed Virgin Mary seated on the same throne. In the
238 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
spandrels over the arches in the two lowest rows, angels seated
on fald-stool thrones in form of green beasts with golden heads*
Each angel bears a seed-pearl star on his lap. Over the double
canopy in the top row are two birds which, according to
Dr. Bock, are popinjays, and have a mystic meaning. The
tracery- work is in gold, the drapery of the figures in gold with
some various coloured silks in certain portions. The '' monster "
heads, acorns, and some other details are in seed-pearls. The
design is very ingeniously planned to fit into the semi-circular
space, to allow all the details to stand out distinctly, without
crowding, from the crimson back-ground, and to secure, as nearly
as may be, that each figure shall appear in an upright position
when the vestment is worn. A. W. Pugin, the well-known
architect, wrote on April 22nd, 1849, after seeing some parts of
this Cope — '' I have no hesitation in pronouncing it to be the
most interesting and beautiful specimen of church embroidery I
have ever seen."
APPENDIX. — Notes on the Stitches emplotbd in the
EMBEOIDBBY OF THE GoPES DESOBIBED IN THE LAST PAFBB.
By MARY ELLEN BAGNALL-OAKELEY.
As early as the 18th century the various stitches used in
embroidery were described by technical names, and in an in*
ventory of the vestments of the Church of St. Paul, London,
made in A.D. 1295, we read of Oj^u% plwnarium, or feather stitch,
which included all fiat stitches ; Opus pulvinarium, or cushion
work, which was like the cross stitch of modem times ; Opus
consutum, or cut work, which is really an appliqu^ of one material
on another; and Opv^s pectineum, which is not true embroidery at
all, but a woven imitation of it. Beside these there was the
celebrated Opus Anglicum, or Broderie Anglaise, which became
the glory of English embroiderers. This was done in a kind of
chain stitch,^ while in the representation of the human face
' Lady Marian Alford in her ezoellcnt book " Needle- work as Art/' caUi it
split stitch.
Notes Oil Stitches, 239
and many other places, was worked, in circular lines, which
gradually fell off into straight, or curved ones, where the outlines
of the design required it : when finished the worker took a
heated iron knob, which was placed under certain parts of the
figure, and by this means they became permanently raised.
Some very fine examples of this kind of embroidery are
described by Father Clifford ; the first of which is the celebrated
Steeple Aston Cope, No. 9.
No. 9. — This is of richly ribbed faded silk ; and the figures
and foliage are all worked in fine chain stitch.
No. 10. — Cope of Boniface VIII This is considered as English
work by Father CUfford, but described by Lady Marian Alford as
coarse Italian work. Probably it has been so mixed up with other
work, as described under No. 5, that some portions are of each
style, while the remainder is German.
No. 11. — The Daroca Cope is of fine Opus Anglicum, and has
the peculiar shrine-work, and twisted columns on the Orphreys,
which were used only in our own land. The shape of the panels
is also considered to be distinctly English.
No. 12 — The Sion Cope is a perfect example of this style of
embroidery, and the grounding of the quatrefoils is done in a long
zig-zag pattern in different colours. The stitch in which the
Orphrey is worked is the same we now use under the name of
cross stitch (Opus pulvinarium), and of more recent date than
the body of the Cope. It contains the arms of Warwick, Castile
and Leon, Ferrars, Geneville, Everard, the badge of the Knights
Templars, CUfford, Spencer, Lemisi or Lindsey, Le Botiler,
Sheldon, Monteney of Essex, Champernoun, England, Tyddeswall,
Grandeson, Fitz Alan, Hampden, Percy, Chambowe, Ribbesford,
Bygod, Eoger de Mortimer, Golbare or Grove, De Bassingbum,
and many others not recognised. These coats of arms, being
mostly blazoned on lozenge-shaped shields, suggest that possibly
they record those of the noble ladies who worked the Orphreys ^
No. 13.— The Cope of St. Sylvester. This is also worked in fiuie
chain stitch, the gold grounding and design are distinctly
English, as also are the two Cherubims clothed in peacocks'
feathers, which was a way of representing them not usual in
other countries.
= Hock's " ToxtUos," p. 276.
240 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
No. 14. — As only a coloured drawing exists of this Cope, it is
impossible to say in what stitch it was worked, but it has the
appearance of being English.
No. 15. — ^The Bologna Cope is very similar in design to the
cope of St. Sylvester (No. 18), and is evidently English, as the
figures of our Blessed Lord and His apostles, with all the other
men, are represented as shaven round the mouth, whereas in
Continental work the beard is allowed to surround the mouth,
and join the moustache.
No. 16. — The Piccolomini Cope is a master-piece of Italian
embroidery of the early Benaissance, the material being gold
brocade covered with designs in needle- work.
No. 17. — The Bowden embroidery. This is a singularly beauti-
ful exajnple of English Opus plumarium, and flat stitches, and
has the twisted oak leaves and acorns, which were not used in
other countries.
No. 4. — German Cope in South Kensington Museum. The
stitch in which this is worked is more of the nature of Opus
pulvinarium, or cushion work, than of true embroidery ; it is not
a crossed stitch, but more Uke a long tent stitch. The whole
Cope is worked in the same way. The coarse linen, on which it
is done, shows plainly the original black outline drawn for the
embroiderer, in places where the silk is worn off; the figures
and their robes are entirely unshaded, and there is no dark out-
line round the figures, which gives it a very poor and flat
appearance. The only gold used on this work is in the small
roses at the junction of the shuttle-shaped spaces, and these were
done separately, and then sewn on. The Orphrey at the back is
sewn in and not on the Cope. I am not aware if the other
German examples, 1, 2, 3, are in this stitch, but certainly No. 6
is not, and is referred to in the description of No. 10.
No. 7. — The St. Louis Cope looks as though it was worked in
Opus plumarium, but it is impossible to be sure of this from a
drawing.
PlateXK
The Misereres in Bristol Cathedral. 241
%%t %i%txtxt% in 3SriiStol CatfietiraL
By ROBERT HALL WARREN.
[Read January 18M, 1888).
In May 1861, at a Meeting of the ArchsBological Institute in
London, I exhibited a series of photographs of the Misereres in
Bristol Cathedral, and some notes thereon are to be found in the
Archaeological Journal.^ I availed myself of the opportunity
offered by the re-adjustment of the Stalls, in 1861, to obtain photo-
graphs of these objects, usually hidden from view and difficult of
inspection, and I then classed them roughly as representing
mediaBval games, rural and domestic occupations, and one or two
Scripture subjects. Since that time, I have discovered that
eight or possibly nine of the thirty-three Misereres are illustra-
tions of the History of Beynard the Fox, one of the most popular
romances of the Middle Ages; and it is from the **Mo»t
Delectable History " published in London, 1694, that I extract
the following in support of this view.
No. 1 (Plate XIX.) will be seen to be a representation of an
animal caught in a trap and belaboured by his captors, and I
have no doubt is explained by the tale of '* How Bruin the Bear
sped with Beynard the Fox." Sir Bruin the Bear is sent by the
Lion (the King) to bring Beynard to court, to answer certain grave
charges brought against him by Isegrim the Wolf, Gurtise the
Hound, Panther, and Chanticleer the Cock. Bruin finds Beynard
at his castle of Malepardus, and Beynard readily agrees to
accompany him to the court, but fears that he is hardly strong
enough to bear the journey ; having religiously practised abstinence
from flesh, and having eaten strange meats, his body is distempered.
Bruin enquires what meat is it that has made him so ill,
Beynard replies, "Honeycombs." " Ah! " quoth Bruin^ " Honey-
«Vol. xviU., pp 273-6.
242 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
combs ! Do you make such light respect of them, Nephew ? Why
it is meat for the greatest Emperor in the World. Fair Nephew,
help me but to some of that honey, and command me whilst I
live ; for one little part thereof I will be your servant everlast-
ingly." " Sure,'* said the Fox, " Uncle, you but jest with me."
" But jest with you !" replied Bruin, " beshrew my heart then, for
I am in that serious earnest that for one lick thereof you shall
make me the faithfullest of all your kindred." Reynard then
promises to bring hiTn where so much honey is,' that ten of them
shall not be able to devour it at a meal; for one Lanfert, a
husbandman, lives near at hand, and is master of so much honey
that the Bear could not consume it in seven years. So away
they went to Lanfert's house. This Lanfert was a stout and
lusty Carpenter, who the other day had brought into his yard a
great oak, which, (as their manner is,) he began to cleave, and had
struck into it two wedges in such wise that the cleft stood a great
way open ; at which the Fox rejoyced much, for it was answerable
to his wish, so that with a smiling countenance he said to the
Bear, " Behold now. Dear Uncle, and be careful of yourself, for
within this tree is as much honey that it is unmeasurable. Try
if you can get into it ; yet, good Uncle, eat moderately, for albeit
the combs be sweet and good, yet a surfeit is dangerous and may
be troublesome to your body, which I would not for a world, since
no harm can come to you but must be to my dishonour." " Sorrow
not for me. Nephew B;eynard," (said the Bear) " nor think me such
a fool that I cannot temper mine appetite." The Bear with all
haste entered the tree with his two feet forward and thrust his
head into the cleft quite over the ears, which when the Fox
perceived, he instantly ran and pulled the wedges out of the tree,
so that he locked the Bear fast therein, and then neither flattery
nor anger availed the Bear, for the Nephew had by his deceipt
brought the Uncle into so fast a prison that it was impossible by
any art to free himself of the same. His cries and howUng
bring Lanfert and his neighbours, armed with sharp hooks,
goads, rakes, broomstaves and other weapons, who belabour him
well. Reynard, afar oflf, calls out to him, " Is the honey good,
Uncle, which you eat? Eat not too much, I beseech you,
pleasant things are apt to surfeit, and you may hinder your
journey to the court." At last Bruin wrestled and pulled so
extremely that he got out his head, but left behind him all the
The Misereres in Bristol Cathedral. 243
skin and his ears also, insomuch that never creature beheld a
fouler or more deformed beast, for the blood covered all his
face and his hands, leaving the claws and skin behind him,
nothing remaining but ugliness. The Bear at last escaped to
the court and made dire complaint against Beynard. The
illustration represents Sir Bruin in the cleft oak, being beaten by
Lanfert and his companions, while Beynard is seen in the back-
ground looking on. (Plate XIX. Fig.l).
No. 2. — Sir Tibert the Cat is then sent on the same errand
to Beynard. He excuses himself to the King as being '' little
and feeble, and if noble Sir Bruin that is so strong and mighty
could not enforce him, what will my weakness avail? '* The King
replied, " It is your wisdom. Sir Tibert, I employ, and not your
strength, and many prevail with art, when violence returns
with lost labour." So the Gat goes and finds Beynard standing
before the castle gate of Malepardus. Beynard readily agrees to
go with his dear Cousin Tibert to the court, but proposes that they
should rest at Malepardus the night, and start early on the
following morning for the court. Beynard for refreshment offers
the Cat some honeycomb. Tibert replyeth, '' It is meat I little
respect and seldom eat. I had rather have one mouse than all
the honey in Europe." "A mouse," said Beynard, " why my dear
Cousin, here dwelleth a priest hard by, who hath a bam by his
house so full of mice that I think half the wains in the parish are
not able to bear them." " Oh ! dear Beynard," (quoth the Cat) " do
but lead me thither ^d make me your servant for ever." " Why,"
(said the Fox) " but love you mice so exceedingly ? " " Beyond
expression," (quoth the Cat) " why a mouse is beyond venison or
the delicatest cates on Princes' tables ; therefore conduct me and
command my friendship in any matter; had you slain my
father, my mother and all my kin, I would clearly forgive you."
Now the Fox had but the night before broken through the mud
wall of the bam and stolen an exceeding fat hen, at which the
priest was so angry that he had set a '' grin " or snare before the
hole to catch him at his next coming, which the fox knew
perfectly. Beynard persuades Tibert to get in through the hole,
which he no sooner does than he is caught by the neck in the
trap, which as soon as the Cat felt and perceived, he quickly
leapt back again, so that the snare running close together he was
half strangled, so that he began to struggle and cry out and
244 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
exclaim most piteonsly. Hearing the noise, Martinet leapt out
of his bed and cried to his people, '' Arise ! for the thief is taken
that hath stolen our hen." With these words the Priest un-
fortunately rose up, and awaked all his house, crying '' The Fox
is taken, the fox is taken ! " and arising stark-naked he gave to
Jullock his wife an o£fering-candle to light, and then coming first
to Tibert he smote him with a great Staff, and after him many
others. The cat perceiving his death so near, in a desperate
mood leapt upon the naked priest, and with his claws and teeth
fastened upon him maiming him for life. The priest swoons
and requires the attention of his wife and Martinet, during which
the Gat gnaws the cord that held him and escapes in a pitiable
condition, making the best of his way to the court to add to the
list of complaints against the Fox. Figure 2 represents the cat
flying at the priest, while Martinet pulls him back by the cord
of the trap, and Jullock beats him with a broom.
Chapters 8 and 9 relate how Grimbard the Brock (the badger)
is then sent, and persuades Beynard to accompany him to the
court. On the way Beynard shrives himself to Grimbard, and
amongst other crimes confesses to having betrayed Isegrim the
Wolf. " I made him a Monk of Esinane," he says, " where I
became also one of the Order only to do him mischief. I made
him bind his foot to the bell rope to teach him to ring, but the
peal had like to have cost him his hfe, the men of the parish beat
and wounded him so sore." This subject is not represented in
the carvings.
No. 8. — The Fox comes to the court and is adjudged to death
by the King. Isegrim and Bruin conduct him to the gallows,
Tibert going before with the halter fastened to the Fox's neck.
Standing on the ladder of the gallows, Beynard makes his
confession before the King and Queen and all the Court, and
informs the King of a plot formed by his late father, Grimbard
and Isegrim, to take away the King's life and make Bruin King.
Beynard frustrated the design by stealing the treasure which the
traitors had secreted for bribing the people : the Queen believes
Beynard, and on his telling the King where the treasure is hid, in
a wood called Husterloe in Flanders, the King pardons him, and
he is honoured of all beasts by the King's commandments. This
scene is represented in Figure 8, where the crowned Lion and
Lioness superintend the preparations for the execution.
Plate XX
The Misereres in Bristol Cathedral. 245
The remainder of the group illustrate the " Shifts of Reynar-
dine, the son of Reynard the Pox."^
No. 4.— In one of Reynardines " shifts," Zani the Ape recom-
mends him to turn Doctor, and promises to supply him with the
necessary articles. " Leave that to me, quoth the Ape, for I have
all things necessary for the purpose. It is not long since I, (with
my companions) going out upon a frolic, found a Pedlar asleep
with his pack lying by him. This pack we took away and equally
as we could divided all the wares amongst us. By this means
I am stored with razors, lancets, scissors, combs, &c.*' Figure
4 shews this scene of the Apes robbing the Pedlar's pack.
No. 5. — Reynardine enters a convent and assumes the religious
habit. He steals a carp from the kitchen, and as penance, is
enjoined fasting for two days and nights ; being " extremely
pinched with hunger," he escapes, and 6ees many geese, &c.,
sporting themselves in a large pond near the Monastery. Before
the Fox would go near them, he sought out a retiring place for
himself, which being there ready, and therefore by him quickly
found, he walked softly towards the pond, seeming devoutly to
read all the way he went, but when he was come near, he read
louder that they might hear him. The geese seeing his religious
habit, and hearing him read so devoutly, fearing nothing, came
all out of the pond, and became his auditors ; among whom, two
of the eldest (though not the wisest) would needs thrust their
heads even into his mouth, to look upon his book. The Fox
seeing this immediately kills them both, and then all the others
in great fear fled into the water again, sounding an alarm all the
way they went. This tale is doubtless alluded to in figure 5,
though more highly developed, for the Fox is seen fully robed,
preaching from a pulpit, while an assistant is behind with a stick
to knock down the geese, and another is seen lurking for them
in a hole hard by.
No. 6. — The freaks of Reynardine, like those of his father,
became at last so irritating that the King promises preferment to
him that should apprehend the Fox, and many beasts go in
pursuit of him ; but all come to an untimely end through the
artifices of Brocket the Badger, Reynardine's friend. Grunt the
Swine is killed in a wood by Careless, the prodigal (in whose
'The edition from which I quote was printed at the Crane in St. Paul's
Churchyard, and at the 3 Bibles on London Bridge, in 1684.
246 Clifton Antiquarian C/nb.
service Reynard had entered), and " his dead body, the Fox to his
great content saw it carried into his master's kitchen." Illustra-
tion No. 6 shews two men occupied in cutting up Grunt the
swine, though as the pig certainly seems alive, we may presume
that they are also killing him in this very unusual manner. The
usual way is either by decapitation as at St. Margarets' Church,
York, and in painted glass at Dewsbury, Yorkshire, or by
sticking in the throat, as the animal stands on the ground, as on
the font at Bumham Deepdale, in Norfolk.
So Chaucer in the Pardoner's tale —
"Thou faJleBt as it were a stikyd swyn."
I was told in a letter from Mr. Fowler (Local Secretary of the
Society of Antiquaries for Yorkshire) that the cutting up of a
pig is represented at Parma, Lucca, Cremona, Piacenza and
elsewhere, but always suspended by the hind feet, with the
head downwards, and as illustrating the month of November, the
Blodmonath of the Saxons.
** Next was Koyember ; he full grosse, and fat
As fed with lard, and that right well might seeme ;
For he had been a-fatting hogs of late,
That yet his browes with sweat did reek and steem,
And yet the season was full sharp and breem.*'
Fasbie Qubbn, Canto. VII.
No. 7. — Perhaps No. 7, besides representing generally the Chase
and the month of September, may refer to Corniger the Hart,
being hunted in the Park.
No. 8 — may refer to Sir Witless the Ass having caught the
Fox, who had cut off his tail and ears, but who in turn is caught
by a woodman, soundly cudgelled, and made his slave.
No. 9. — " Last scene of all " seems an appropriate conclusion
of the series (though it does not occur in the legendary Etccount),
for the geese are here shewn hanging the Fox, as at Malvern
Priory, Rats perform this last ofl&ce for the Cat.
Of the remaining Misereres, seven illustrate the athletic games
of the period, six or seven appear to perpetuate local jokes or
domestic incidents, three are too indecent to be exposed to view,
or even mentioned, two are simply foliage, and four or five only
by the greatest stretch of imagination have any scriptural or
religious teaching.
No. 10. — ^A very grotesque carving of a Mermaid being un-
PlateJffl,
J mt t ^ '. «•
TAe Misereres in Bristol Cathedral, 247
scaled by monsters, was considered by the late Mr. Albert Way
to have allegorical reference to the tale of Susannah and the
Elders ; or it may have been suggested by the Mermaids being
supporters of the Berkeley Shield which are carved on the Stalls.
Lithographs of this, and of several of the subjects which follow,
were published some years ago by Mr. Lavars, and copies were
exhibited in illustration of the paper, but they are not here
reproduced.
No. 11. — The Temptation. The Serpent, with human head,
coiled round the tree, regards Eve, who has just plucked the
forbidden fruit.
No. 12. — Samson slaying the lion ; the jaw-bone of the ass in
his girdle.
There is very little to remark in the way of costume, but one
or two peculiarities in the games call for passing notice.
In No. 18, a wrestUng scene, prominence is given to a scarf or
girdle round the neck, which the men, otherwise nude, are holding
on by. Strutt in his Sports and Pastimes, quoting Carew, says
that one of the laws of wrestling was " wearing a girdle to hold
by." In an illustration which he gives from the Royal Collection
of MSS., this girdle is represented round the neck, as shewn
here, and an almost identical illustration is to be seen in one of
the buttresses of the cloisters of Magdalen College, Oxford.
No. 14 is evidently a burlesque of the game of Quintain,
which, as Stow tells us, consisted of hitting at a board at the end
of a horizontal pole balanced by a pivot on a stake in the ground ;
at the opposite end of the pole hung a sack of sand. " Hee that
hit not the board end of the quintain was laughed to scorn, and
he that hit it full if he rode not the faster had a sound blow
upon his neck with a bag full of sand hanged on the other end.'*
In Strutt's Sports and Pastimes is a representation of two men
seated on the ground in the same manner as shewn on photo-
graph No. 15, with an upright stick between them, which they
both hold, and it is there suggested that the contest depends
upon the breaking of the stick, and in a struggle to overthrow each
other. This Miserere carving is mutilated, so that the stick
cannot be determined with safety, though indications of parts of
it may be traced where they might be expected, and the position
of the men looks like a trial of strength, which a fall from the
table would decide.
248 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
No. 16. — ^A man and woman tilting with brooms, thus described
by the late Mr. R. J. King in Murray's Cathedrals, Western
Division. '^ The man is mounted on a pig, the woman on what
seems to be intended for a turkey-cock, although the turkey is
usually said to have been introduced at a much later date
(Henry VIII.) than that of the Miserere."
No. 17. — A man and woman quarrelling over a cauldron on
the fire ; a domestic squabble in which apparently the lady wins
the day.
No. 18. — Blind-man's-buflf.
No. 19. — Dancing bears ; an ape in the background beats
a drum.
No. 20. — Two dancing bears and their keepers ; the latter with
wheel-barrows.
No. 21. — ^Men captured and bound by a demon and ape-like
monsters, who drag them into the '* jaws of Hell."
No. 22. — Men and women flying from a double headed dragon.
No. 28. — ^A man with a long two-handed sword parts two
fighting bears (?) armed with swords and small round shields.
No. 24. — ^A curious nondescript monster, somewhat like a huge
slug, under a tree, between two men — one in armour, the other
with a double thonged whip, with which he is about to strike
the animal.
No. 26. — ^A small chapel or hermitage, with pointed door and
triple lancet window, outside which a woman (?) reads from a
book placed on a lectern.^
No. 26. — A man and woman with a tame squirrel. Another
squirrel watches them from the branch of tree on one side.
No. 27. — Two men, one of whom is riding backward on a
horse (?) and holding its tail as a bridle.
No. 28. — A man on horse-back taking a sack of com to a
windmill.
Noa 29 and 80. — Foliage only, one being of much later date
than the rest, probably 17th century.
Nos. 80 to 88. — No longer in the Cathedral ; fortunately.
So much has been said as to the use for which these moveable
seats were intended, that no end would be gained by re-opening
31 fancy this is intended for an anchorite's cell, the reader being probably an
Augustinian hermit. A chimney appears over the roof of the building, and there
is a small round tower with a twisted spirelet, at the angle. — ^Ed.
The Misereres in Bristol Cathedral. 249
the subject. The Very Eev. Canon Kock seems to have solved
the difficulty of their being so universal in large churches by
reminding us that each stall was allotted to a particular benefice,
and that thus the occupant of each might, in course of years, need
the support which it gives. The same high authority says that
in some churches, in early times, the monks were permitted to use
staves or short crutches, whereon to rest during long services in
the choir. The use of these Misereres is one thing, but the
purpose of the carvings beneath them is quite another, and more
difficult to explain. I wish that I could accept the defence of
these grotesques with the usual admixture of indelicate and even
indecent subjects, on the ground of their being held up to
reprobation, but the attendant figures on the side lobes bear the
expression of mirth rather than disgust, and seem to revel in the
ecclesiastical saturnalia. The constant recurrence of ludicrous
and grotesque carvings, both outside and inside our churches, in
positions where they would attract attention, as in the spandrels
of the arcade of the 13th century Lady Chapel in Bristol
Cathedral, as well as in the case under notice where they would
comparatively seldom be seen, is an undoubted proof that they
were permitted and even sanctioned by the Church of the middle
ages, which, in her conciUatory policy towards the instincts of
human nature, collected within her walls all that would attract
and captivate every sense.*
The stalls to which these Misereres belong, were erected by
Abbot Elyot, who ruled at St. Augustine's from 1616 to 1626,
and his initials frequently occur upon them. He was a benefactor
to the church in other ways, as he built the upper part of the
Abbey Gateway, and rebuilt the Cloisters, intending to complete
the Nave. We can hardly imagine that so zealous a restorer
4 In Archaologia^ vol. xil., pp. 22, 28, are some interesting remarks on this
subject by the Bev. Samuel Denne, F.A.S., in which attention is called to the
fact that these carvings are to be found in other countries as well as in England,
as at Gorbeil, and Strasburgh. In our own country, notorious specimens were at
Westminster Abbey, and Canterbury Cathedral. Dr. Moore in his " Yieno of
Society in France** vol. i. pp. 370, mentions that on the pillars and cornices at
Strasburgh, the vices of the monks are exposed under the allegorical figures of
hogs, asses, monkeys, and foxes, in monkish habits, who perform the most sacred
functions of religion. In Dawson Turner's '* Tour in Normandy" vol. i. plate 18,
a miserere from Beverley Minster is figured, on which are carvings representing
** the Feast of Fools," a subject which the author says was frequently represented
in such sculptures, both in England and on the Continent. — Ed.
G
250 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
would have allowed these carvings to have been placed without his
cognisance.
Note. — ^It is much to be regretted that the interesting Organ
Screen which was erected at the Dissolution, and remained in its
original position until the year 1861, should be allowed to lie
rottmg in the burial ground. At the time of its removal, it was,
I believe, intended to re-erect this in some other part of the
church, and it is a pity that some such place is not found for it.
The initials H. B. with the tudor arms, and E. P. with the badge
of the Prince of Wales, decide the date of the screen as between the
years 1537 and 1547, the birth and accession of Edward VI., in
addition to which is the mark of Thomas Wright, Receiver
General of the Chapter in 1541. This last is figured in Bristol
Past and Present, vol. ii. p. 67. I shall be very glad if any
representation on the part of this Club, or of the Bristol and
Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, would lead to the preserva-
tion of these interesting remains.
PlateSCn
prisTol i^oTheclral.
'-'-^nltrlo^of^.Ale)leorVew^fave»te«aQO^clIVo^mJaa"Wfci(l.
; J ''^ pom, a Pll.af»<.x»>»..
».•
The Lady Chanel of Bristol Cathedral. 25 1
j^otes on tfte CJirteentj) Century
il^ati^ Cliapel of Brtieitol Cati)eXrral
By THOMAS S. POPE, Abchitect.
DuBiNa the visit of the members of the Gab on March 6th last
to Bristol Cathedral, the Very Reveorend the Archdeacon (Dr.
J. P. Norris) asked the opinion of the members as to the possi-
bility of the thirteenth century Lady Chapel, " the Elder Lady
Chapel/' as it is called, having been originally detached from the
North Aisle of the Norman Church. The question gave rise to
an interesting discussion, and our Secretary readily accepted an
invitation from Dr. Norris to meet him, with a small number of
those of our members who were interested in the subject, for the
purpose of making a minute examination of the building with a
view to settling the matter. Accordingly, on March 28th last, the
following members of the Club, Sir John Maclean, F.S.A., Col.
Bramble, P.S.A., Mr. John Eeynolds, Mr. Alfred E. Hudd,
P.S.A., and myself, met the Archdeacon in the Cathedral and
spent some considerable time in an examination of the masonry
and construction of the Elder Lady Chapel, both of its exterior
and interior walls. I was then requested by Dr. Norris to give a
summary of the information we had collected as to the original
plan of the building, which I now proceed to do.
1. By the assistance of a photograph taken for Mr. Geo.
Street, the architect, showing the west end of the South Aisle of
the Choir before the building of the New Nave, we were enabled
to prove that the Aisles of the Nave ii^ Norman times were much
narrower than the Aisles of the present fourteenth century
Choir, being something like a third less in width. (See Plate
XXII.) These Norman Aisles appear to have been vaulted, and
to have had wide Triforium galleries over, which seem to have
252 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
been open to the roof timbers of the side aisles of the original
church. Probably the double Norman Capitals, of which one
remains in the churchyard, belonged to this Triforium.
2. A view of " the north-eastern portion of the Cloisters of
the Cathedral, and back of the Minster House," by Skelton, in
his " Antiquities of Bristol" Plate V., seems to show that the
Minster House (since destroyed) was built upon the walls of the
Norman South Aisle, the width of which is thus indicated in the
engraving.
8. The window recesses on the South side of the Chapel appear
to have straight joints, having apparently been filled in with later
masonry. This was ascertained during our visit, by Mr. John
Reynolds, with the aid of a mason armed with hammer and
chisel, and seems to indicate that these south lancets, like those
on the north side of the Chapel, were originaUy open to the Ught.
The 13th century lancet windows on the south side were evidently
reduced in height when the 14th century recesses, afterwards used
as tombs, were pierced. These recesses were probably used
originally for votive offerings, as we now see on the Continent.
From the similarity of the mouldings and details of these recesses
to some of those in the South side it would appear that both were
the work of the same designer. The smaller 14th century niches
in the Elder Lady Chapel were probably filled with votive figures.
The difference of character in the carving of the arcading, and in
the bosses of the groining, must mark a^difference of date, and
the way the bosses, or rather corbels, of the groining are carried
down into the label-moulding of the tomb recesses, almost marks
a reconstruction of the wall in parts. (See Britton, Plate V.)
4. In the present North aisle of the Chancel a narrow line
running east and west for several yards appears on the floor
between the tombstones, which it was suggested by Mr. Hudd,
may cover the foundation of the North wall of the Norman
Church. This could easily be tested by raising one or two of the
paving stones of the aisle, and might possibly settle the question
of the width of the Norman Church, by revealing the remains of
the Norman wall itself. This line is six feet four inches from the
present inside line of the aisle wall.
5. The groove still visible from the roof of the Lady Chapel
upon he Norman buttress at the north-east angle of the North
Transept, and also upon the base of the Early English pinnacle
The Lady Chapel of Bristol Cathedral. 253
of the Elder Lady Chapel, measures an angle of 58 degrees, and
possibly when covered with lead an equilateral angle of 60 degrees,
a very usual pitch of 13th century roofs.
Taking the roof at an angle of 60 degrees fits into the centre
line of the Chapel as shewn in Britton's plan of the Cathedral,
and leaves about an equal thickness of wall on either side, but
the apex of the arch in the Lady Chapel does not correspond
with the centre of the window over.
Another fact that we ascertained was that one of the arches,
the most eastern on the south side, was used as a piscina,
as the drain still remains, and this would account for the unequal
width of the arches at that point ; so that I think we may assume,
with every probability, that the Chapel as originally built, had a
high pitched robf, and was isolated from the north wall of the
Church. Probably it had insufficient buttresses, accounting for
new buttresses and a new wall built against it. A very similar
arrangement is shewn in the plan of Thornton Abbey,
Lincolnshire, but with a porch or entrance from the north aisle.
(See reports and papers of Associated Architectural Societies, York
and Lincoln, 1852, page 157.)
Thornton was, like Bristol Cathedral, a house of Austin Canons.
Li order to study our ancient monasteries, we should examine
the buildings of the Order to which the house belonged, each
Order having the same architect, who was generally a member
of one of their houses. It seems to me quite Ukely that the east
window of Bristol Cathedral was designed, and very possibly
worked, by the same man who did the east window of Carlisle,
also an Austin house, and possessing the finest traceried window
in the world, which was erected shortly after 1292.
At Ely also the Lady Chapel is on the North side of the
Church and completely detached, and in the long article on
Augustinian Houses pubUshed in the Archaological Journal^
Volumes 42 and 48, by the Rev. J. F. Hodgson, several churches
are mentioned having chapels upon the North side.
Most unfortunately William Wyrcestre's account of St.
Augustine's breaks off just when he is about to give the size
of this chapel, ** Capella decens edificata in boriaU parte elsB
chori continet in longitudine .... virgas."
This chapel is called in a foot note of Dallaway's edition of
WiUiam Wyrcestrey p. 130, Bradstones Chantry. When making
254 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
the Deanery Boad, we discovered a fine fragment of a tomb carved
on both Bides which might well have belonged to a chapel of this
date. The tomb was probably somewhat like tombs now existing
in Lincoln and Salisbury with arched canopies over figures.
The Altar platform in the Lady Chapel extends 9 feet 6 inches
from inside the east wall ; in the first bay of the arcade is a
piscina, and in the third bay an aumbry.
The fact that Norman corbels exist in the roof of the stairs
leading to the Triforium proves little, but that they were old
materials re-used ; in rebuilding Leigh Church I found a corbel
similar in design built up in the centre of the wall. Mr. Hodgson
in his paper mentions that some of the Transepts in the
North were called Porches, and that they were used as mortuary
chapels by the great Families in the neighbourhood; he also
mentions the curious fact that when one Transept had been
erected in the Norman style originally, the other one was erected
afterwards in the same style, although perhaps in the Early
English period ; this may possibly have occurred in our Church,
but the want of filling in of the chapel at the north-west comer
rather militates against the theory. Still, we have the holy water
stoup remaining at the west-end pier, which seems to have been
used both for the northern entrance and for the Lady Chapel.
And the Early English jambs of the North Transept window all
point to a rebuilding, or great alterations, at the same period.
We have now to notice the difference of masonry in the buttresses
to the Elder Lady Chapel, and that to the eastern buttress sup-
porting the Early English pinnacle, which very nearly corresponds
with the Norman pilaster buttress to the Transept, with courses ten
inches deep. The masonry of the other buttresses is very similar
to Abbot Enowle's work, Dundry stone and old red sandstone.
Now what is the reason of this ? My theory is this, that the
Lady Chapel was first built with an open timbered roof, and that
in the very early part of the 14th century, it was vaulted in stone,
there being a considerable difference in thei carving of the bosses
and that of the arcading and spandrels. Probably this happened
at the same time as the building of the east window of the
Chapel, which, by the way, appears to me to be somewhat
of the same date as the eastern windows of the aisles, which
are certainly earlier than the other decorated windows of the
Church. We know that often the mediaeval churches were not
The Lady Chapel of Bristol Cathedral. 255
vaulted until some years after the building of the side walls,
presumably to allow the walls time to harden ; but in this case
the builders were not satisfied with this, but either cased the old
buttresses, or perhaps entirely rebuilt them. The upper part,
with buttresses and pinnacles, is of 15th century work, perhaps
built when the high pitched roof was lowered to the present
level, and the battlements placed to the choir and the new Lady
Chapel. This was probably to save expense. Abbot Enowle
having lost his chance of obtaining money in not receiving the
body of King Edward II., and the church having become isolated
from the old city by the digging of the " great trench." In fact
S. Mary Bedclifif had become the pride of the citizens, instead of
the Austin Abbey. About the same time, the high pitched roof
was removed, the present perpendicular window containing some
beautiful 15th century glass was inserted in the space formed
by the old roof, and curiously enough the centre of its arch does
not accord with the centre of the arch of the Lady Chapel from
the North Transept. Some few early tiles formerly remained,
which may well have been a portion of the ancient floor of chapel.
The recesses for tombs at the sides seem, from the carving of the
bosses, to have been formed at much the same date as the lower
part of the eastern reredos of the choir, and I think it net at all
unlikely the old shafts and capitals were then re-used in the south-
eastern bays as pedestals for figures, perhaps of the '' Annuncia-
tion " — The Blessed Virgin and Two Angels. There appears to
be a great similarity of work between the Elder Lady Chapel
and remaining portions of Almondsbury Church of the same
date ; we know the Abbey possessed a manor house there, and
have records of one of the Abbey officials having been killed on
his way there in 1299.
I have only now to call attention to the beautiful coloured
decorations upon the arcades of this chapel of which I give
a sketch.
Upon observing the Cathedral plan in Britton's book it seems
as if the external wall of the new aisles had been built up against
the old walls of the Lady Chapel as buttresses, or rather to save
building new ones on that side, and this accounts for the great
depth of the recess for the Berkeley tomb. The doorway over
which are the arms of Abbot Somerset, 1526, is stated by
Britton to have been made in consequence of the unfinished and
256 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
impassable state of the North Transept, perhaps on account of
the erection of the groining. This doorway seems to me most
beaatifol, on account of the light and shade of its mouldings,
and the architect seems to be repeating in the 15th century
work the beauty of the 18th century. I ought still to account
for the rough eastern wall, but at present I confess I cannot.
There must have been a reason for placing the floor of the
Elder Lady Chapel about 15 inches above the floor of the Aisles
and Transepts. Perhaps it was built on the old level of the Green ;
or perhaps the builders discovered, after building the Elder Lady
Chapel, that, the foundations — thin beds of stone, with layers of
clay between — were not very reliable, and in building the Choir,
sank down the piers to the thicker beds of clay, which accounts
for the peculiarly constructed piers and transverse arches, so as to
save expense ; and for the same reason the high pitched roofs were
never carried out, and that to the Lady Chapel removed.
I can scarcely understand the little niche between the Transept
and the Lady Chapel, but probably this chapel was built upon the
old level of College Green, and to save expense of excavating a
gradual incline, steps were made from the Green. (See marks
of three steps in cloisters by Chapter Boom, the steps to cloister
door, a step in South Transept, and two steps to Elder Lady
Chapel). The truth was money was necessary. First, the Lady
Chapel was built as being the popular cult of the time, as we
have no records of any particular relics of saints in the church.
In central France I have always found the raison d'etre
of most of the big churches was the acquisition of some popular
relics, such as a bone of S. Denis, or the head of S. Martin.
The early Normans, who were by-the-bye, adventurers of all the
European nations, were not quite easy in their minds after
the .many ^murders and robberies they had committed, and
therefore founded churches out of their ill-gotten gain ; but that
time had passed. Li the 13th century, relics brought home from
the East served the same purpose. The age of apses and early
Norman churches, the fashion set by the Abbaye aux hammes and
Abbaye aux Dames at Caen, had passed ; the English ideas were
again asserting themselves ; Early English architecture, certainly
one of the most perfect styles the world has ever seen, became
the fashion, with the Saxon square ends to the churches.
mteim
TheGu<-i-"--
S-KaVherine's HospiRi.
Bright-boWjBedminsler
sketch -pi aa.
ftoborril«'
Hwbitat-
10*Cs»fcryCap.
Ntrtfa
The Hospital of St. Katherine. 257
Bngl^tlioh), near 3$mtoL
By ALFRED E. HUDD, F.S.A., Hon. Secbetabt.
TowABDS the end of February, 1887, with a few of the members
of the Club, I visited the site of this Hospital, and examined the
scanty remains of the buildings, then in process of demolition.
Our attention had been called to their approaching fate by a
letter written to the Bristol newspapers by the Eev. Ign. Grant,
M.A., and by the exhibition in the window of a shop in Park
street of some interesting drawings of the '' Guest House " of
the ancient Hospital, from sketches taken in the previous month,
before its demolition had been commenced ; one, of the North
side of the building, by the Bev. Eric Leslie ; another, of the
South side, by the Bev. I. Grant. By the kindness of these
gentlemen we are enabled to reproduce these views on Plate
XXin. The work of destruction — which had been commenced
a few days only before we visited the site — had proceeded so
rapidly that little of the structure was to be seen above ground
except a few fragments of walls. At the present time not a stone
remains upon the spot. It has been thought that some account
of the Hospital and its history might be of interest to the Club,
and Mr. John Taylor having kindly furnished me with some
notes on the allusions to St. Katherine's to be found in Smyth's
hivez of the Berkeleys — one of the most valuable records of our
local antiquities — I purpose to supplement these with a few
gleanings from other sources.
The original document from which John Smyth, of Nybley,
gathered most of his information relating to Bristol history —
Abbot Newland'a Chronicle — although preserved at Berkeley
Castle in Smyth's time, seems to have since disappeared. In the
258 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
year 1874 Mr. Gordon Hills, F.S.A., visited Berkeley Castle, and,
by permission of Lord Fitzharding, examined the ancient manu-
scripts he found there. The same year Mr. Hills gave an address
to the members of the British Archffiological Association at their
Bristol Congress, in which he stated, " Newland's Chronicle is
said to be in existence in Berkeley Castle, but though this state-
ment has been often repeated, it is not correct. It is to be feared
that in the Civil Wars the Chronicle was lost, and that Smyth's
valuable manuscript compilation now at Berkeley is the only
existing representative of the Chronicle."^ Fortunately the
other important and interesting MSS. which are now at Berkeley
are well cared for, and even should the originals disappear in
course of time, the contents of some of the most valuable of
them have been preserved for future generations in the three
handsome volumes printed by the Bristol and Gloucestershire
ArchflBological Society under the careful supervision of Sir John
Maclean, and for which the antiquarian world is greatly indebted
both to Lord Fitzharding and to that Society.
The history of the foundation of St. Katherine's in the
thirteenth century, of its benefactors up to the time of its
suppression, with some notices of the Masters, are to be found in
Smyth's MS., in the Wells Kegisters, and in various local
Histories, but little is known of the Hospital itself, or of the
architecture of its buildings. These consisted probably of a
Chapel of considerable size, a Guest House or Befectory, a Gtite
House, several small dwelling-houses, or chambers, probably
arranged in one or more quadrangles ; and an Infirmary.
The length of the nave of the Chapel according to William
Wyrcestre,* was 16 yards by 7J yards in width ; the chancel 9
yards by 5 J yards. This was probably pulled down at the end
of the 16th century, although some trace of it seems to have been
left so late as A.D. 1829. When Barrett wrote his History
of Bristol^ (c. 1789) he described the site of the Hospital
as then occupied by a Glass-house, though, he continues,
"some arch windows there still point out its site, and the
fields behind it are called Catherine Meads to this day."
Two years later (1791) CoUinson* states that the glass-
house had been converted into small tenements, and that
' Journal of the British Archl. Association^ zzzi. 241.
« WyroeBtre'B Itinera/ry, f. 294. 3 Barrett, 597. < Oollinson's Somerset 11. 282.
The Hospital of St. Katherine. 259
nothing remained of the original buildings of the Hospital
except '* the east end of the Chapel, where there is a Gothic
window now blocked up." John Evans, writing in 1824, says^
that the site '' where latterly stood a glass-house " was then
partly occupied by a tan-yard ; and five years later (1829) Butter
states® that '* There still exist considerable portions of St.
Catherine's Hospital. • • It stood on the west side of the street
near Brightbow bridge, and part of the eastern end of the Chapel,
with a Ipointed window now filled up, is still existing." In the
first number of Sealey's Archceological Magazine^ published in
Bristol, May, 1843, is a paper " on ancient Hospitals, with a
notice of that of St. Catherine, Brightbow," by J. Eussell
Woodford (at that time Hon. Sec. of the " Bristol and West of
England Architectural Society," afterwards Bishop of Ely), in
which an interesting account is given of this Hospital. The
writer says,^ of the remains of St. Katherine's existing in 1843,
" The ruins of this house are very insignificant, nor have we any
data on which to form a conception of what the original building
was. . . The building now remaining has been broken up into
cottages of the most wretched description. But a few ancient
windows are still visible, though blocked up, and a doorway on
the south side, under a very depressed arch, the mouldings round
which are boldly cut." (See Plate XXHI.) As the " pointed
window " and remains of the east end of the Chapel are not
mentioned by Mr. Woodford, they had probably been pulled down
some time between the years 1829 and 1843. It seems strange
that after such a chequered existence any remains should have
been left of the buildings, and that after escaping the attacks of
glass manufacturers, tanners, and others, the walls should have
at last, if not exactly, ^' ended in smoke," yet entirely dis-
appeared to make way for a 19th century tobacco warehouse.
" All is absorbed by an immense fabric of Bristol * Bird's Eye '
tobacco, and by the great firm of Wills and Company. No other
record of them exists but the sketch of the remains by Father
Leslie and my own," writes Father Grant, in his interesting
paper, *' Frcym Oxford to Douay.**^ The following extracts from
this pamphlet are here given by kind permission of the author : —
** Pass over Bedminster Bridge, leaving the fair tower and spire
5 Evans, Bristol^ p. 50. ^ Batter, Somerset^ p. 219. 7 Archl. Mag,y p. 25.
^ Reprinted from The Month, Maroh, 1887.
26o Clifton Antiquarian Club.
of St. Mary, Bedcliff, the most beautifol Parish Gharch in all
England, behind you, and walk straight on until you see some
almost deserted and now tumble-down cottages, with the word
' Brightbow ' on the angle of the group. No need of your put-
ting your ear to the ground at night ; when all is still you will
hear the rush of a rivulet making its way underground to St.
Eatherine's Mead ; and you will see the brook of Bishops worth
coming forth to the river if you follow it up to the right of East
Street. Formerly it watered the Abbey Gardens and Little
Paradise ; then it turned the Abbey Mill, which existed a year
ago, and of which I beUeve my own rude sketch is the only re-
cord extant ; it passed under the bridge or how^ and rejoiced the
hearts of the Priest Warden and his twelve poor men — ^the
inmates of St. Eatherine's Hospital, looking south, with its mead
of St. Eatherine opening out to the shipping in the Avon ; to the
old Augustinian Abbey and to Brandon Hill, crowned with its
coronet of flowering white thorns, and surmounted by the hermi-
tage of the saint whose name it still bears. . . This house
was on a great road of pilgrims ; pilgrims to St. Anne's-in-the-
Wood, and even pilgrims to Glastonbury, or pilgrims from the
country to Bristol itself, and to the famous shrine of St. Mary
Bellhouse in Old St. Peter's Church, passed along from Bed-
minster Down, and rested here, footsore, wallet laden, intent on
a pious work of faith. . . For pilgrims then was St.
Eatherine's Hospital built Like that of St. Gross at Win-
chester it was sufficiently endowed to a£ford a dole to everyone
on his way — a piece of bread, some good Cheddar cheese, and a
good draught of cider. Of all this only a few vestiges remain.
A stone building looking south, with the tracery of a Tudor door-
way now blocked up, is all that exists of the Guest House, where
once the wayfarers were received. . . Alas, while I write these
words (Feb. 12th, 1887), they are pulling down the remains of
the hostelry. By Tuesday next not a * wrack ' will be left behind."
The Tudor doorway, shown in the view of the North side of
the Guest House on Plate XXHI., has been preserved by one of
our members, Mr. Alfred G. Pass, who intends to re-erect it in
the neighbourhood. All else has gone. The view of the South
side of the Guest House shows more clearly its division into
stages, with some windows which Father Grant supposed to have
belonged to the dormitories, above the large square-headed win-
The Hospital of St. Katherine. 261
dow and door on the ground floor of the Refectory. Under the
lower string course in this view a series of markings appear,
^rhich probably show the line of the lean-to roof of the cloister.
Possibly there was another cloister on the North side. A sketch
plan of the Hospital is given in Mr. Alfred Ellis's map of
" Bristol in 1480," compiled chiefly from notes then made by
Wm. Wyrcestre, and published in Bristol Past and Present.^
Although the details of this plan are not very trustworthy, it
shows the position of the monastic remains of the neigh-
bourhood, and we have therefore reproduced a part of it on Plate
KXIII. with slight alterations. The Chapel, no trace of which
was to be seen at the time the late destruction of the buildings
was commenced, probably stood at right angles to the Guest
House at its eastern end. Old people in the neighbourhood
remember some ancient buildings here, which were pulled down
many years ago, and here probably stood the gable of the Chapel,
with the pomted window, mentioned by Butter and others in the
early part of this century. Near here was found the 15th century
Capital, probably from the Chapel, a figure of which from a
drawing by Mr. T. 8. Pope, is given on Plate XXIH. Near
here also was found a stone with some Gothic letters, which
Father Grant believes to be part of the name *' Katherine,"
and which may have belonged to '' the image of holy St.
Katherine," mentioned later in this paper as being '* fixed up
in the front house " of the Hospital about the year 1628.
The following notes from the Berkeley MSS. relating to St.
Katherine's have been compiled by Mr. John Taylor : —
** The earliest mention of this foundation is contained in
Smyth's Lives of the Berkeleys, where,^^ under the life of Eobert,
the second of that name, A.D. 1189 — 1220, it is said that
'^ This lord also founded the faire hospitall of St. Katherines
a litle without Bristowe, within his manor of Bedminster,
which to this day (c. 1640) keepeth the name, though the
founders pious intention bee changed, as after foUoweth in
theis relations, whereto his brother and heire, the lorde Thomas,
was a singular benefactor, as the words in Abbot Newland arc.''
Subsequently Smyth states that Lord Thomas the first (1220-
1248) was a '' singular benefactor to the Hospitr.U of St.
Kathenns by BristoU," and that he " gave certain lands in
9 Vol. I. p. 216. '«» Berkeley MSS. (MacleavCs EdnJ I. 89.
262 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Slimbridge to Ellas Butler, to pay for ever out of the same
to the Chantry priest there for the better service of our lady
and of St. Katherine, fower gallons of oyle and six pound of
wax to bume before them, for the good of his owne Soule, his
fathers, mothers, and of Jone his wife." ^^
The second Thomas, Lord Berkeley (1281—1821), born 1245,
spent much of his early life at Bedminster, " which Manor his
Father for support of his youthes expenses, and for his first
initiations in husbandry conferred upon him ; in which course,
and untill the tyme of his marriage, he contynnued : having the
Abbot and Prior of St. Augustine's Monastery by Bristoll,
and the Master of St. Eatherine's hospitall (confyning upon
this Manor of Bedminster), creatures begot by his Ancestors
Almes and devotions, his guides and instructors." He died
1321, and was buried " in the Arch betweene the Vestry and the
South lie " at St. Augustine's.^*
In the 16th year of Eichard II. ** arose another Exchequer
business more full of trouble, about the Hospitall of St. Ejith-
erines, in Bedminster," . . . '^ wherein the maine question was,
whether the said Hospitall, and the Chantry founded in the
Chappie there, were one and the same or not ; which was by
Jury found soe to bee, and so avoided the charge of the record ;
which tooke begininge from an injurious Inquisicon found before
the Escheator of that County of Somerset." ^ This Chantry was
instituted by Thomas " the third," lord Berkeley (1826—1861),
in the 21st year of King Edward the third ; '' the same year hee
gave to the Custos of St. Eatherine's of Bedminstre a parcell of
land near to his said hospitall, for which he bound himself and
his successors to pour out their prayers for the souls of his father
and mother, and of Margaret his late wife." ^^ The same lord,
Thomas the third, founded (A.D. 1847) the hermitage that still
exists in the red rock on the bank of the Avon opposite the west
end of the church of St. Mary Bedcliff. He also founded several
other Chantries in Bristol and the neighbourhood, and '* gave to
the prior and fryars heremites of BristoU, divers lands in the
suburbs of Bristoll."
The last reference made by Smyth to the Hospital of St,
Eatherine is to be found in his " Description of the Hundred of
Berkeley" in the account of the Parish of Alkington.^^ Smyth
" Id. p. 110. '■ Id. 220. «J Id. II. 17. '< Id. I. 887. 'S id. HI. 60.
The Hospital of St. Katherine. 263
states of '^ The Hospitall of Bedminstre lands, late Nevills^ — ^in
the hamblet of Wike and in other places within this tithinge of
Alkington, and in Wanswell, are certain lands and tenements
late parcell of the possessions of the hospitall of St. Katherine
in Bedminstre by Bristoll, founded by Eobert Lord Berkeley, the
second of that name, in the beginning of the raigne of Einge
Henry the third, as in his life I have elsewhere written. To
which lands, supposed to bee concealed. Queen Elizabeth was
entitled by Inquisic5n, and granted the same away in fee : which
afterwards by attainder againe returned to her : who again first
granted the same to hold of her by Knight's service in Gapite ;
And after again to hold in comon Soccage : Theis lands whereof I
heere write, (whereof John Knight of Wike holds 25 acres in Wike
for his life. And Thomas Hody, of Bristoll 100 acres in Wanswell
in fee,) came to Thomas Sackvile created lord Buckhurst, and
after Earl of Dorset, and his Go-feofifees, who aliened a great
part of the possessions of that hospitall, and after conveyed the
residue to fiErancis Nevill, Esq., who by his further sales hath
much also dispersed the same : and these are now the inheritance
of the said Thomas Hody, cozen and heire of Thomas Hody, who
purchased the same of the said ffrancis Nevill as aforesaid."
This Thomas Sackville, Earl of Dorset (1527—1608), was
the author of " The Mirror f(yr Magistrates^* and according
to Warton, in his ^^ History of English Poetry^'* furnished
the model upon which Spenser formed the style of his
'^ Faerie Queene," the first three volumes of which appeared
in 1590."
According to Collinson's History of Somerset ^^ the last of the
Berkeley family who possessed the manor of Bedminster and the
patronage of St. Katherine's was Thomas, the fourth lord of that
name, by the marriage of whose only daughter and heiress it
passed in 1416, with many other estates, to Bichard Beauchamp,
Earl of Warwick; and on his death in 1439, the manor of
Bedminster came to Eleanor, the second co-heiress, whose
daughter Margaret was married to Humphrey, Earl of Stafford,
father to Henry Duke of Buckingham, and grandfather to
Edward, Duke of Buckingham, who all successively possessed
the manor. By the attainder of the latter in 18 Henry YIH.
it was confiscated to the crown, and was the same year granted
'* Somerset, Vol. II., p. 282.
264 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
to Henry Bouchier, Earl of Essex, by whose death in 1589, it
again reverted to the Crown. In 1553 it was given by Philip
and Mary to Edward Nevil and his heirs, and in 1605 was sold
by his grandson, Henry Nevil, to Sir Hugh Smyth, of Long
Ashton, whose descendants have held the site of the Hospital,
with the rest of the Manor till last year.
The name of the saint to whom the Hospital was dedicated
(Saint Eatherine of Alexandria) is spelt in many different ways.
In the 13th century St. Eatherine was perhaps more popular
in Western Europe than any other female saint, her fame having
been brought from the East by the Crusaders. We have adopted
for the Bedminster Institution the old spelling of the name as it
appears on the seal of the Hospital, although in ancient MSS.
it is more frequently given as Eaterine. Impressions of the seal
still remain, and are thus described by Mr. Walter de Gray
Birch, in his recently published Catalogue.^^ — "Pointed oval,
2^ in. by \\ in.. Saint, with crown, standing in a canopied niche,
with tabernacle work at the sides ; in the right hand a sword,
in the left hand a wheel. Legend very indistinct. SIGILL
HOSPITALIS SCE EATHERINE VILLE BEISTO ..."
The above description seems to agree with a sulphur cast in
my possession of an impression of the seal which I understand
is appended to a deed preserved at Oxford, the date of which is
not stated, but is probably late 15th century. St. Eatherine holds
in her right hand a long cross-hilted sword, point upward, the
blade resting on her right shoulder. With her left hand she
holds the upper part of a large plain wheel, which rests on the
ground to her left. The inscription is much longer than that
given by Mr. Birch, but is so indistinct in my cast that I will
not attempt to correct the reading. In the second number of
the Archaological Magazine of Bristoly tfc, p. 44, the late Mr.
Wm. Tyson, P.S.A., engraved an earlier seal of the Hospital, of
which Mr. Birch makes no mention in his Catalogue, and which
Mr. Beady of the British Museum informs me is quite unknown
to him. Mr. Tyson ^ thus describes this earlier seal : " I am in
possession of two mutilated impressions of the seal of the
Hospital of St. Eatherine, appended to deeds dated 1348 and
1434; and herewith I send you a drawing taken from these
impressions which you are at liberty, if you think proper, to
'7 Catalogue of Seals in the British Museum, 1887, I. 461. '^ Arch. Mag., p. 44.
The Hospital of St. Catherine. 265
engrave for your publication." This 14th century seal, as
represented in the engraving, differs considerably from the later
one. The saint is represented uncrowned, with long flowing
hair, holding in her right hand a short sword, the point of which
rests on the ground. In her left hand she holds, resting against
her left shoulder, a small spiked wheel. She stands under a
large trefoil headed niche, the ground of which is sem^e with
small six-leaved flowers, one of which appears also on her breast.
Her vestments are stiffer and much less flowing than in the later
seal, and below the canopy, at the feet of the saint, is a large
heater-shaped shield charged with the arms of the Founder,
Eobert (the second) Lord Berkeley, who died A.D. 1220, viz.,
gvLe%i a chevron argent between ten crosses, patties. This Lord
Thomas was " the first Lord that assumed into his coate, the
ten crosses, which all his posterity doe beare till this day,''
these crosses being added in memory of a vow taken to a
^' Christian warfare in the Holy Land against the Infidels,"
which vow, Smyth states,^® was taken at this time by no less
than sixty thousand men in England alone.
After Mr. Tyson's death in 1851, his collections of antiquities,
manuscripts, &c., were sold by auction in Bristol, and my efforts
to trace these deeds and seals have hitherto been unsuccessful.
I am not, however, without hope they may eventually turn up.
THE MASTEES OF THE HOSPITAL.
We know nothing of the first Masters of St. Katherine's from
its foundation about the year 1220 till the beginning of the year
1824-5, when the Wells Eegisters begin to give some little infor-
mation on the subject. In the Register of John de Drokensford,
Bishop of Bath and Wells (1309-1329), recently published under
the editorship of Bishop Hobhouse, by the Somerset Becord
Society, it is recorded that,
(1) January 18th, 1324-25, the Bishop issued from Banwell a
commission to an official, to visit, among other places, " St.
Katherine's House, Bristol, to audit accounts of the late
Master, and finally remove him, appointing as guardian ^' pro
tem." a Brother of the neighbouring Hospital of St. John,
and to correct all excesses."^ The editor throws no light on
'9 Berkeley MSS., I., 219. ^^ Drokaisford's Register, 234b.
7
266 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
this somewhat obscure bit of history, beyond stating that the
Hospital having been founded by the Berkeley family within
their manor of Bedminster, was then within the Somersetshire
diocese.^^ We know neither the name nor the ofitence of the
disgraced Master. A few months later, however, another entry
in the same Register^ informs us that,
(2) " 7 Kal. May, 1826," the Bishop of Bath and Wells sent
to the Master of St. John's, Bristol, and the Vicar of Bed-
clyvd, reciting the King's Warrant to the Bishop, to admit
John of Babcary , Chaplain, to the Wardenship of St. Eatherine's
Hospital, Bristol, and authorizing the two Commissaries to
induct. The Patronage of the Hospital is stated to have
belonged to Sir Maurice de Berkeley (the third of that name),
but ''in the custody of the King" (Edward H.), who therefore
exercised the Patron's office of confirming the election " quoad
temporalia."^ Lord Maurice having espoused the popular side
against the King and the Despensers, was at this time a prisoner
in Wallingford Castle, where he died in the following year.^* The
name of this John of Babcary, is elsewhere mentioned in the
same Begister, the earliest date being November, 1316. On
accepting the Mastership of St. Katherine's he seems to have
resigned the Rectory of Fordington, Somerset, a Chapel in Bab-
cary, endowed according to the Valuation of Hen. YIH. with 40«
tithe, which Uving was presented by the patron, (Sir) W. de
Beigni, 4 Nones September, 1825, to John Dunkyn (or Dukyn)
Priest.2«
(3) Robert (atte Pondefolde) of Burfords Cote, Wick, seems
to have succeeded John of Babcary in the Mastership of St.
Katherine's, the date of his induction, according to the list of
Masters compiled from the Wells Registers by Dr. Archer and
copied by Collinson and others, being Sept. 30th, 1827. The
entry as printed from Drokensford's Register in the volume of
the Somerset Record Society, p. 275, reads :
" Bp. to Prior of St. John's Hospl. Bristol, to induct Rob. de
Boreford's Wyke, Pr., inst. by Bp. to Wardenship of St.
Katherine's Hospl. Bristol. Patron, Sir Thos. de Berkeley,
8 Kal. Oct. 1827."
As given in the transcript of the Wells Registers made by
" Somerset Record Soe., I. i239. "" Drok. Beg. 238b. '3 Somerset Beoord Soo., I. 244.
^ Berkeley ^ISS. I. 272. •s Drokensford's BegiiUr, 240b.
The Hospital of St. Katherine. 267
Matthew Hutton in 1686, now in the British Museum {JBLarl.
MSS. 6964) the entry reads :
" 2 Eal. Oct. (1S27), Mandat ad inducm. Bic. de Borefordescote
Wyk, presb., ad custm. hosp. see. Johs. de Bristol, ad. pres. Thos.
de Berkle. mil./* from which it would appear the said Bobert was
master of the neighbouring Priory of St. John ; but as later he
is named as Master of St. Katherine's it is probable a mistake
was made in the Hutton transcript, or that he was first ap-
pointed to St. John's and afterwards was removed to St.
Katherine's. Tlie following appears in the Begister of Bishop
Eadulph, or Balph of Shrewsbury, A.D. 1829—1868 :
"7 Kal. Apl. 1882, apud London. Gommiss facto Decani
Sarm. in negocio (permutus ?) inter Dom. Bic. atte Pondefolde
de Borewardeskote Wyke, custode perpetm domus see Eaterine
Bristol ad pres nobilis Dm. Thom. de Berkelee, et Dm. Bandolfe
de Coleshall perpetum vicar, eccl. de Shipton in Eath. Sarum."^
[March 26th, 1882, Commission given at London to the Dean of
Salisbury to enquire into the affairs between Dom. Bichard atte
Pondefolde of Burford's Cote Wick, the perpetual Master of the
house of St. Eatherine, Bristol, on the presentation of the noble
lord Thomas de Berkeley, and Dom . . Bandolph of Goleshill,
perpetual vicar of the Church of Shipton, &c.]
(4) The name of John Bandolph appears several times in the
Wells Begisters, and there seem to have been at least two
individuals of that name about this period. In 1806 John
Bandolf was appointed one of the arbitrators to enquire into a
dispute between the Dean and Chapter of Wells, and the
Berkeleys, respecting rights in Winscombe. Li 1818, J. Bandolf
is named as one of the lords of the manor of Cheddar, or
rather of '* Ceddre Moor." John Bandolph, of Coleshill, became
master of St. Eatherine's according to Dr. Archer, April 11th,
1382,«7 and
(5) John, of Malmesbury, succeeded, October 22nd, 1888.^
The names and dates of the Master's of St. Eatherine's given
by Barrett, CoUinson, and other later writers, are mostly
taken from the ^* Account of the Religious Houses of the
Diocese of Bath and WeUs, by Dr. Archer, Archdeacon of Wells,
which was published as an Appendix to Hemingford's Historia,
^ Hutton transcript, foL 64.
f " Badtdph, fol. 66 *' (Dr. Archer). •« Reg. BadvXj^h, fol. 182.
268 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Hearne's edition,* having been compiled by Dr. Archer from the
Wells Registers, in February, 1729. In cases where I have been
unable to give other authority I have quoted Dr. Archer's list,
not having been able to consult the original Registers at WeUs.
(6) John Eggesworth, or Eggelesworth, priest, was admitted
Master of '' St Eaterines," December 10th, 1848. This name is
variously spelt, but he was probably from Wales, perhaps from
Eglwyswrw, in Pembrokeshire A certain Boger Eggeworth,
possibly a member of the same family, was Prior of the Bristol
Fraternity of Kalendaries, in the year 1526.*^
From a document of the year 1848, formerly in the possession
of the late Mr. Wm. Tyson, F.S.A., with the seal of the Hospital
attached,'^ it appeared that " John Eggelesworth " was Master
in that year. It is recorded in the Register of Bp. Randulph^
that '' 4 Ides, Dec. 1848, he made his profession before the
Bishop in the following terms : — " I, John Eggeworth, promise
perpetual observance of good morals, chastity, and denial of
property, which I will keep from my soul from this time, accord-
ing to the rule of the Hospital of St. Katherine, near Bristol, in
the diocese of Bath and Wells, which I henceforth profess as
ordained by the holy fathers, as much as is consistent with the
said rule, or hereafter shall be consistent for me to observe, and
I will lead my life according to regular discipline." At the same
time he swore obedience to his diocesan, Ralph of Shrewsbury.
Barrett, who quotes the above in his History of Bristol, in-
correctly gives the date of the " profession " as made December
4th, 1857, instead of December 10th, 1848, or as it is dated in
the Register, " 4 Ides, Dec. 1348."
(7) William, of Foston, priest, admitted April 14th, 1349, on
the presentation of Thomas de Berkeley.** This priest is not
named as Master of the Hospital, and may have been appointed
only to the Chantry founded in the Chapel there.
(8) Walter, of East Ham (" de Estham "), priest, appointed to
the house or hospital of St. Katherine, near Bristol, by Ralph,
Bishop of Bath and Wells, on the presentation of Lord Thomas
de Berkeley (" de Berkelygh ") patron. 2 Kal. May, 1349.»* For
some cause unknown Walter does not seem to have been a success,
^9 Historia II. 686-642. ^ Evan*s Chronological Outlines Bristol, 131.
i' Bristol ArchcBological Magazine, 44. ^ Reg. Randulph, fol. 328.
3' Rog. Radulph, f. 340. '* Id. 800.
The Hospital of St. Katherine. 269
as we learn from the same Begister that, '* 9 Eal., Nov., 1353,
Walterus Estham, Master of the house of religious (domus
religiosus) of St. Eatherine, was removed by the Lord Bishop of
Bath and Wells.''^^
(9) John de Kynemerton (Kilmersden ?) was presented, Octo-
ber 29th, 1353, on the presentation of Lord Berkeley.^ Barrett
gives the date 1343, but this is a mistake. '
(10) John Dififord (Dyflford or Disford) given by Collinson on
the authority of Dr. Archer. He was Master of St. Katherine's
in 1373, as appears by the following extract from a Patent of 46
Edward III., quoted by Tanner^ "... Bex dedit loannes
Disford custodiam hospitalis S. Eatherinse de Bedminster, ratione
custodisB terrar et hseredis Mauritii de Berkele Mil. defuncti."
(11) [Dom] Nicholas de Barnstaple. This master is not named
by Dr. Archer, and we do not know how long he ruled the Hospital,
but he resigned the Mastership in A.D. 1414, as recorded below.
He was probably a son of John Barstaple, and Isabel his wife, the
founders of Trinity Almshouses, Bristol, where their monumental
brasses still remain. " Nicholas Barstaple " is named in the
foundation Charter, granted by Eing Henry V., and is said to
have been the first Master of Trinity HospitaL In the will of
John Gaywode, of Bristol, May 1471, mention is made of " Sir
Nicholas Barstaple, clerk, "^ but if he was the ex-master of St.
Eatherine's he must have been a very aged man at that date. In
his Antiquities of Bristol, p. 91, Dallaway gives the Arms and
" descent of Barstaple, from Wills," and the Arms also appear
on the monumental brasses above named.
(12) John Worthy, instituted April 21st, 1414.*® This Master
who only seems to have presided over the Hospital for a few
months, was appointed on the resignation of Nicholas de Barn-
staple, or Barstaple, as appears from the following extract from
the Wells Begister of Bishop Bubwith, (1407— 1424). *i
"loannes Worthy presb. institutus in magistrum sive cus-
todem hospitalis S. EatherinsB de Bedminster juxta Bristol, ad
presentat dom. Thomse de Berkeley, per resignationem dom.
Nicolai de Barnstaple (" Bamastapill "). Dictum hospitale
non est locus Beligiosus a primseva fundatione ; et olim magister
35 Hutton transoript, I. 259. ^ Reg. Bandulph, f. 424. 37 Notitia Montutica.
3B Manohee's Bristol Charities, vol. I. ^ Bristol Wills, p. 146.
♦<» Dr. Archer's Account, p. 605. ♦' WeiUs Beg,, BubuMh, 83.
270 Clifton Antiquarian Cliib,
dicti loci habuit secnm aliquando iv. ant ill ant ii. presbjrteros
socios sea confratres, qui omnibas temporibns suis habitom
gestaront sacerdotum saecularium, prseterqaam quod pro veste
exteriori, capa sive mantello di nigro vel bumeto« cum rota
S. EaterinsB de panno alterius coloris lq sinistro pectore consuto
utebantur. Bedditus ejusdem hospitalis valorem amiuum 24d£.
non excedunt, et dictum hospitale tenetur singulis annis ecclesiae
de Bedminstre ad amiuam pensionem 6s. 8d. solvendam rectori,
et, in festo S. loannis Baptistse, ecclesiae de Bedmynstre in
duabus cereis duarum Ubrarum cerse."
[Translation. John Worthy, Priest, instituted Master or
Warden of the Hospital of St. Eatherine, of Bedminster, near
Bristol, at the presentation of the Lord Thomas de Berkeley,
through the resignation of (Dom) Nicholas de Barnstaple. The
said Hospital was not a reUgious house from its origmal founda-
tion, and in time past the Master of the said place had with him
sometimes four, or three, or two Priests, Fellows or Brothers, who
always wore the habit of secular priests, except that, instead of
the outer vestment they used a Cope or Mantle of black or
burnet, with the wheel of St. Eatherine from cloth of another
colour sewed on the left breast. The revenue of this Hospital
does not exceed £24 per annum, and the said Hospital is held by
the year of the Church of Bedminster at the annual payment of
6s. 8d., to be paid to the Bector on the Feast of St. John the
Baptist, to the church of Bedminster in two wax candles of two
pounds each.]
Nicholas Bubwith, Bishop of Bath and Wells, from 1407 to
1424, from whose Register the above interesting information is
obtained, was a man of some note. He founded the Hospital at
Wells, still called by his name. He was one of the English
envoys at the Council of Constance, which condemned the
writings of WycUf, and sent John Huss to the stake. In con-
sequence of the spread of Lollardism in Bristol, Bishop Bubwith
43 This word bumeto seems to have puzzled writers on St. Katherine's;
Dr. Woodford does not attempt to translate it, (Archl. Mag, i. 24) saying, only
*' they used a cope or mantle of black, with a St. Catherines wheel, &o." I am
informed by Sir John Maclean, F.S.A., that bumetaiss, cloth made of dyed wool,
and that the burnet colour is distinct from brunua or brunet (See Crabb's
ArchcBologieal Dictionary,) Perhaps the colour resembled that of the burnet flower
{Sanguisorba officinalis) a curious purple brown, or brownish purple.
The Hospital of St, Katherine. ttj i
sent an order to the Dean of Bedcliff, in 1405, forbidding
preaching, or disputing on doctrine, to all unlicensed persons.^
(18) John Dyer, priest, admitted November 19th, 1414, on the
resignation of John Worthy.^
(14) John Coriscomb. No date given by Dr. Archer, but Col-
linson *^ says A.D. 1420.
(15) John Fulford, S.T.P., a preaching Friar. " Presented
June 1st, 1425, on the resignation of John Coriscomb, on the
presentation of Eichard de Beauchamp, Earl of Warwick.** He
was probably a relative of Sir Baldewyn Fulford, of Fulford in
the County of Devon, Knight, who was executed at the High
Cross, Bristol, in the presence of King Edward IV., in September,
1461, and whose memory under the name of "Syr Charles
Bawdin " is perpetuated in Chatterton's pathetic ballad, " TKe
Bristowe Tragedie" The forfeited estates of Sir Baldwin were
afterwards restored to his son. Sir Thomas Fulford, Knight, by
an Act passed by Edward IV.*^ CoUinson gives the name of this
Master incorrectly as " Thomas Fulford, D.D."
(16) James Blakedon, D.D., of Blagdon, Somerset, Bishop of
Achonry, in Ireland, described in the Begister as " Jacobus
Akadensis Episcopus,'' became Master at St. Katherines,
October 11th, 1482.*^ During a recent visit to London, I
endeavoured to find out something of this Master's history,
but could not even discover his surname. Since my return,
I fortunately applied to my friend the Eev. B. H. Blacker, who
sends me the following from Cotton's Fasti Ecclesia Hibemicce : *•
" 1442, Jas. Blakedon, D.D., a Dominican friar, succeeded (to
the Bishopric of Achonry) by the Pope's provision, dated Oct. 15th.
(Hibernia Dominicana.) In 1452-8, he was translated to Bangor.
He was born at Blackdon (Blagdon) in Somersetshire, and in
1448, became a suffragan of Bishop Beckington, of Bath and
Wells. He was likewise Master of St. Katherine's Hospital, at
Bedminster. ... He held this last appointment till his death
on October 24th, 1464." Probably he was buried at St Kathe-
rine's. Bishop Blakedon was instituted, in 1447, to the rectory of
Stockton, Wilts, as recorded in Phillipp's Wiltshire Institutions.
43 866 Hunt's Somerset Diocese, p. 142. London S.P.K., 1885.
**Buhw. Beg., £. 87. « CoUinson, II. 288.
4« WeU$ Reg., Stafford, 1. 12. (Dr. Arch6r, 605). *7 Evans, Bristol, p. 107.
^ WeUs Beg., Stafford, f. 168. -» Vol. iv. p. 101.
272 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
(17) Henry Abyngdon, musician of the Kings Chapel, who was
Master when William Wyrcestre wrote, is thus mentioned in the
Itinerary : " Hospitalis domus in ecclesia Sancta KaterinsB ubi
Magister Henricus Abyndon musicus de Gapella regis est
Magister."*^ The said Abyndon, or Abyngdon, was Master
according to Barrett, in 1465, to Collinson, in 1478, and to
William Wyrcestrer, about the year 1484 ; a long period. The
date of his institution is not given by Dr. Archer. He died 1497.
(18) Thomas Cosyn, S.T.P., was " admitted Master of the
house or hospital of St. Katerine of Bedminster, September 1st,
1497, on the death of Master Henry Abyndon, at the presenta-
tion of Elizabeth, Duchess of Norfolk, and with the consent of
Margaret, Countess of Eichmond and Derby." ^^ Collinson** in
his list gives the name " Thomas Cofyn, B.D.," and the date of
his institution " September 1st, 1491," which is a mistake.
(19) John Lloyd, instituted April 21st, 1513, on the resigna-
tion of Thomas Cosyn, 8.T.P., " at the presentation of Edward,
Duke of Buckingham, Earl of Herford, Stafford and Norfolk."^
(20) Bichard Waldegrave, gentleman ; a layman. May 12th,
1523.*^ Barrett^ says, " Bichard Waldegrave being Master or
Custos of this Hospital, an agreement was made that the image
of the holy St. Katherine, fixed up in the front house, between
the causey and the barton of the said Hospital, should be kept
clean and in good repair." Barrett gives 1558 as the date of this
** agreement," but this is doubtless an error.
(21) William Clarke, also a layman, appointed April 14th,
1543, by the King's letters patent.^^
'' 14 April, 1543, Will. Clerke, literatus, ad liberam capellam
sive hospitale see. Katerine propr. Bedminstre p. mort ad prs.
Anton. Denny arm. hac vice r (?) Concess. regem." During the
time Clerke was Master, the Surveys of 2 Edw. VI. (1548) took
place, the first treating of the possessions in the lump, the
second of the property in detail as shewn in the Bental. By the
kindness of my friend Mr. E. A. Green, F.S.A., I am enabled to
give the Survey and Valuation of St. Katherine's, from the
quarto work on The Somerset Chantries, which he is editing for
the Somerset Record Society.
soDallaway'8 edn., p. 149. s^ Reg. King, f. 10. Hutton transcript, 11. 152.
53 Collinson, 11. 2S8. s4RegiBter Hadrian de Gastello, f. 107. Hutton transcript, f. 18.
55 Id, Clark, f. 3. sc Barrett, 598. ?? Wells Reg. King. 10. (Dr. Archer.)
The Hospital of St. Katherine, 273
117. Belrmpjften {The. Survey).
3rf)e ffree Ctj^pell or l)Oji({ittall oC gamete |latertne tl)er.
Landes teiite and hereditamte in the tenure of sondery i^ setels
psones as maye appere ticulerly more at large by the xoortlje in
Bental of the same xxjZi. xys. iiijc2.
Whereof in
Eente resolute paid yerly v«. iiijd.
And so
Bemayneth clere xxjZi. xs,
»Ute ano ^ chalice of silv waying — ^viij oz. do (i) .
Bell metall C lb.
Omamentes praysed at — iiij«. vjd.
JAemorb. William Gierke gent (as yt is saide) Maister of the
same hospitall by the Kinge Ires patente, not yit
shewed.
Ther be no poore people mayteyned or releved w* the premisses,
saving that the saide Mr. Gierke assigneth iij cotages pcell of the
same hospitall wo'the yerely — xxs. not charged in this value, for
the poore men to dwell in, and other relief, they have non but as
God sendeth.
The priest alwayes incubent before hym was bounde to saye
masse there thryse euy weke.
No fundac5n shewed.
BetrmpsEter* {The Rental Detailed.)
tli\)t fxn (!ri)apel or Hojitpital of jiU |&atl)eriiu tl)ere.
Bichard Hall holds the scite and demesne lands of the said
Hospital, and renders per ann. — vijK.
Alice Sparrer holds two acres of meadow in Lookemoor, and
renders per ann. — ^iij«. iiijd.
John Goke holds one acre of meadow in Wademore, one acre
of meadow in Boenmede, and one acre of meadow in Bodmede,
and renders per ann. — yjs. iiijd.
Divers persons hold as well according to custom as at will,
274 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
divers lands and tenements in Bedmjster and Aisheton in the
county of Somerset, and in Barkeley in the county of Gloucester,
to the said Hospital belonging, and render per ann. — xiijZi. xvij«.
viijd.
holds a certain tenement in the city of
Bristol!, and renders per ann. — viij«.
holds iij Uttle cottages called Almoshouses in
the parish of Bedclyff in the suburbs of BristoU, and renders per
ann. — mly because they are inhabited by paupers.
Total — xxjZt. xv«. iiijd.
•
Deduct in. — ^Money paid to the Lord the King as for the price
of a lb. of pepper, per ann., for chief rent — ^iiij«. iiijd. Money
paid to the said Lord the King for suit of Court to be annually
performed — xijd.
Total — v«. iiijd.
And remains over, per annum — xxjZt. x«.
The priest before Gierke was bound to say mass thrice a week,
but in his time probably no masses were said, and there was no
priest ; shortly after both were restored for a brief space, for we
learn that on the death of Gierke, in 1557,
(22) " John Angell, or Aungel, one of the Chaplains of the
Chapel Boyal, was instituted Master or Warden, by injunction
of the King and Queen, Philip and Mary." ^ Whether Angell
continued to act as Master after the accession of Queen Eliza-
beth in the following year, we do not know.
(23) James Bonde, 8.T.B., (B.D.) was appointed in August,
1568,®^ but on the death of John Angell, on the presentation of
Hugo Brooke and John Hill,
(24) John Bridgwater, M.A., late Canon residentiary of Wells^
was appointed November 28th, 1570, on the presentation of the
same two gentlemen.®^ Of this "chief among the converts gained
by the Romanists during the reign of Elizabeth," as he is called
in Mr. Hunt's recently published Diocesan History,^ Father
Grant, S.J., has written an interesting memoir under the title of
" From Oxford to Douay,** from which he kindly allows me to
quote the following extracts :
5« Barrett, 599. » Rymer'a Foedcra, xv., 479. *• Dr. Archer, Barkley, fl, 26.
*' Id. fl. 31. ^ Somerset Diocese', 138.
The Hospital of St. KatJierine. 275
" John Canon Bridgwater . . . sent in to Bishop Berkeley
. . . a written resignation of his canonry of Wells, of his
living at Porlock, and that of Stanton Drew. ** He desired to
devote himself to study and retirement, and would be well
contented with the Mastership of the little Hospice of St.
Eatherine, Brightbow, at £25 per annum, for he had private
means of his own. " He had ahready resigned his rectorate of
Lincoln College, Oxford, and his perpetual curacy of Wotton
Courtney, near Taunton. He now gave into the Bishop's hands
Compton Bishop, near Axbridge. This altogether meant the
renunciation of a net income of about £2,800. The renunciation
was accepted very willingly by Berkeley (a descendant of the
Lord who built St. Katherine's) leaving only one injunction and
sign of feudal tenure, viz.^ that the Hospital should pay 6s. 8d.
— a groat of that day — to supply wax candles at Candlemas to
the Church of Bedminster. So behold him empty handed and
installed at Brightbow. He is supposed to have chosen Bristol
on account of its proximity to the famous John Fowler, printer
and publisher, of Small Street in that City, whose ripe scholar-
ship and CathoUc tendencies were well known." After a few
years at St. Eatherine's, in 1577, Bridgwater, a^ccompanied by a
former chorister from Wells, named Rasing, and John Fowler,
fled to the Jesuit College at Douay, where they were joyfully
received by Cardinal Allen. Father Bridgwater, after his
ordination as priest by the Cardinal, spent much of his time at
Douay, where he wrote several works in defence of the old
religion, and the Papal supremacy. He died in 1594, and was
buried at Treves.** " Who but John Bridgwater himself can tell
the tryals of his mind ? " But ..." as Aquapontanus " he has left
us the result of his life-thoughts, contained in two rare treatises,
one called the Calmno-Papistce of Elizabeth's reign, the other A
Concertation an the Papal Supremacy, in an answer to John of
Heidelberg." «*
According to the Rev. William Hunt, M.A, when Father John
Bridgwater joined the Church of Rome several of his fellow
students of Lincoln College, Oxford, followed his example.®^
(25) Edward Mowcroft. Date not given by Dr. Archer, but
stated by Collinson to be 1572.^
*3 " From Oxford to Douay ^'^ reprinted from T/te Month, for April, 1887.
** Id., pp. 5, 6. ^ Som&raetshire Diocese, p. 188. ^ Somerset, II., 283.
276 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
(26) Francis Nevil, the last Master on record, was appointed
during the reign of Elizabeth, May 26th, 1573.*^ The Chapel had
been sold some years before (2nd Edw. VI.) when William Clark
was Master, as stated above. The house appears to have gone
gradually to decay. In 1634 (26th Hen. VIII.) the revenue of
the hospital was valued at £21 15s. lOd., the tenths £2 3s. 7d.^
The site was granted, June 16th, 1587, to Edward Heme and
John Nicholas, by whom it was sold, in 1588, to Henry Nevil,
Esq. His grandson sold it, in 1605, to Sir Hugh Smyth, Knight,
of Ashton, from whom it descended to Sir Greville Smyth, Bart.
Recently the property has been purchased by the Firm of Wills
and Company, who have, as before stated, pulled down the few
remains of the ancient buildings, and have erected upon a
portion of the site a huge tobacco factory. In 1730, a portion of
the site was occupied by a glasshouse,^ afterwards converted
into small tenements ; and, untU recently, another portion of
the site was occupied by a tan-yard. There is nothing on the
spot to preserve the memory of the hospital except the name of
a modern thoroughfare called '^ Catherine Mead Street."
^ Dr. Archer's AccovinJt^ Barkley^ 26. ** Dr. Archer, fol. 606.
^ Mr. Strachey's " IAaI of Religioua Houses," Ac,, in Hemingford's " HisU
oria," II., 664.
Proceedings, 1886-7. 277
1887—1888.
MEETINGS AND EXCURSIONS.
The third Annual Meetin^^ was held on Thursday, January 27th, 1887,
the President (Bishop Clifford) in the chair. In the absence, through
indisposition, of the Treasurer (Colonel Bramble), the financial statement
for the past year was read by the Secretary, showing a small balance in
hand.
Some slight alterations in the Rules, of which notice had been given,
were then proposed to the meeting and carried, the chief of these being
to increase the number of Ordinary Members of the Club from 40 to 50,
and to raise the annual subscription to half-a-guinea, which would
include a copy of the '* Journal of Proceedings.''
It was annoimced that at the last meeting of the Committee, Mr. John
Reynolds had been elected an honorary Member. The ballot for new
members resulted in the election of Dr. John Beddoe, F.R.S., Rev. J. W.
Hardman, LL.D., Mr. John Latimer, Professor C. Lloyd Morgan,
Mr. C. H. Spence, M.A., Mr. W. N. Tribe, and Mr. Stephen Tryon.
The following Members were then elected to serve as Officers and
Committee for the year 1887: — President, the Hon. and Right Rev.
Bishop Clifford; Vice-Presidents, Dr. Beddoe, F.R.S., and Lieut.-Col.
J. R. Bramble ; Treasurer, Mr. John Williams ; Secretary, Mr. Alfred
Hudd, F.S.A. ; Committee, Messrs. Thomas S. Pope, John Taylor,
A. T. Martin, M.A., and Robert Hall Warren.
The President then gave a short Address on some of the proceedings and
work of the Club during the previous year. Bishop Clifford expressed
great regret at not having been able to accompany the members in their
visit to Stonehenge, a monument in which he felt much interest. Several
of the theories as to the origin and use of Stonehenge having been alluded
to, Bishop Clifford said, that the mortice-and-tenon arrangement in
which the trilithons of Stonehenge differed from all other British
megalithic remains, reminded him of some of the early buildings of
Rome and other parts of Italy, in which a somewhat similar plan was
adopted to fasten together the great stones of which the buildings were
constructed. He thought this seemed to indicate a later date, for the
erection of the trilithons at any rate, that most recent writers had
27S Clifton Antiquarian Club.
attributed to the monument. Some discussion followed, in which
several members took part, and it seemed to be the opinion of most of
those present that the theory suggested by the late Dr. Guest, and
supported by sereral of our best nodem antiquaries, by which the
erection of Stonehenge was attributed to a period of about fire hundred
years before the commencement of the Christian era, was probably as
near the true date as we shall ever ascertain.
Mr. Thomas 8. Pope exhibited a drawing of, and read some notes upon,
a fifteenth structure of timber, which he had recently observed in a
cellar in High Street, Bristol. Mr. Pope presented a tracing from this
drawing for insertion in the Club Album, to which he had made several
valuable presents on previous occasions. The Secretary invited similar
contributions of drawings, tracings, engravings, and photographs of local
antiquities, from other members of the Club. (See Plate XVIII., fig. 1.)
MEETING IN BRISTOL— NOEMAN REMAINS.
On Friday, March 18th, 1887, a meeting of the Club took place in
Bristol, for the purpose of inspecting the remains of Norman architec-
ture that exist in the city. At 2 p.m. the members assembled in
St. Peter's Church, where they were met by the Vicar, the Rev. W. T .
HoUius, M.A. The western tower of this church has been generally
described by Bristol historians as part of the original Norman church
which was given by Robert Fitz Hamon to the Abbey of Tewkesbury,
about A.D. 1100, but much doubt was expressed by tnose members of
the Club who had paid attention to the subject, whether even a
fragment of this Norman building remains visible. Mr. John Reynolds
thought no portion of the present building was of earlier date than the
13th century, in which view Mr. Pope and Mr. W. E. Jones, coincided.
The Secretary called attention to the fact that the late Mr. E. W.
Godwin, F.S.A., who had studied and made careful drawings of the
tower many years ago, also regarded it as a building of the 13th
century.^ Its claim, therefore, to rank as a ^' portion of the original
Norman structure " < cannot well be sustained. Doubtless there was once
a Saxon or early Norman church on or near the site occupied by the
present biulding, but this was probably quite destroyed when the church
was rebuilt in the 15th century, or about the year 1657, when, the parish
books inform us, much mending of the church and tower took place.
The statement as to the Norman date of the tower has been frequently
made by local writers, and was repeated in print shortly before the visit
of the Club to the church. In Plate XVII. of Picturesqiie Old Bristol^
published by Messrs. Frost and Reed, in February, 1887, a view is
given of St. Mary-le-Port Street, with the west side of St. Peter's
tower, and in the letter press accompanying the etching it is stated —
" The church tower in the view is that of St. Peter's, the mother church
of Bristol. The lower stages are Norman, and the oldest EccleeiasttccU
work in Bristol" During the afternoon the members had the oppor-
tunity of examining architectural remains in several of the Bristol
' Archaological Journal, six. 91. * Bristol Past and Present, ii. 127.
» Proceedings, iSS^-S. 279
churches of much older date than any portion of the work now to be
seen at St Peter's, though it is possible that the cores of the massive
piers, like those which support the central tower of the Cathedral, may
be of Norman date.
The present visit being exclusively devoted to an inspection of the
Norman remains, the interesting features in St. Peter*s church of post-
Norman date were deferred for a future occasion, and the members pro-
ceeded by way of the still picturesque though sadly modernized street
of St. Mary-le-Port to
The Chubch of All-Hallowen, or All Saints,
where some imdoubted relics of Norman date are to be seen. These
consist of four stunted circular piers with plain cushion capitals of the
12th century, at the west end of the nave, which support the houses
that still extend over the western terminations of the north and south
aisles. Mr. John Taylor explained this curious arrangement by pointing
out that the piers on the south side supported the floor of the Vicarage
House, which still remains, while those on the north formed part of the
house once occupied by the Guild or Fraternity of the Kalendars, who
were removed here in early Norman times from Christ Church opposite,
and whose library, *' the oldest public library in England,'' was placed
in a chamber over the north aisle, long since destroyed, with most of its
contents, by fire. Mr. William Thomas said that on an old plan in his
possession of a portion of the city of Bristol, made about A.D. 1830,
the chancel of All Saint'a Church was given as extending to the comer
of High Street. The next visit was to
Bkistol Cathedral,
where the Venerable Archdeacon Norris received the members in the
grand old Romanesque Chapter House, and in the adjoining vestry he
ravoured them with a most interesting address on the early history and
remains of the Norman Abbey, on the conclusion of which, the buildings
themselves were inspected.
The Norman work of St. Augustine's is of two periods; portions
of the walls of the north and south transepts, the cores of the tower
piers, and the gateway to the Abbot's lodgings belong to the original
church, commenced A.D. 1142 ; while the Chapter Room and the lower
part of the great gateway in College Green belong to the later period
(about A.D. 1160), after the Founder, Robert Fitzharding, had been
presented by the king with the Berkeley estates. See Berkeley MSS,
The idea that the Chapter house had at any time been continued one
bay further east, to which the Archdeacon alluded, seemed conclusively
decided in the negative by the existence in the present eastern wall of a
couple of 12th century pilaster-buttresses, which it is hardly likely
would have been rebuilt. The beautiful designs of the interior of the
Chapter Room, its plainer but even more elegant vestibule, with its
circular and very early pointed arches, the plain Norman doorways in
the north cloister, and in the south wall of the south transept, and some
very curious Norman fragments in the staircase of the north wall of the
north aisle, were carefully examined. The Archdeacon having invited
28o Clifton Antiquarian Club.
remarks upon the subject of this staircase, which had long been a
puzzle to ontiquarieff, and did not seem to have been satisfactorily
explained by either Mr. George Godwin or Mr. Street, it was suggested
by Mr. John Reynolds that it was probably a lean-to avenue leading
from the north aisle of the Norman church to the clerestory above,
similar to one in Malvern Abbey. The Rev. Ign. Grant thought it
might have been connected with the Anchorite or Hermit whose duties
in Augustinian Churches to watch the lights and keep guard during the
hours of darkness, required some such cell, from which the High Altar
and interior of the church would be visible. Another member expressed
an opinion that the stair was not of Norman date, the 12th century
corbels and fragments having simply been made use of when the
entrance was made to the clerestory in the 14th century, and it is quite
possible that this last named view may be the true solution of the
difficulty. The Norman entrance to the Abbot's lodging, and the small
fragment remaining visible of the great Abbey gateway, at that time in
the hands of the *' restorers," were looked at, but in consequence of the
snow it was found impracticable to visit the Norman remains of the
Abbot's House, in the ground to the south of the Cathedral, which had
therefore to be deferred for another occasion. After thanking the
Archdeacon for his kind reception, and for his invitation to visit the
Cathedral again to inspect the beautiful remains of its 13th and 14th
century architecture, the Secretary said he hoped to avail himself of this
invitation next year, when he proposed that the members should inspect
the Transition and Early English architecture of the City. On leaving
St. Augustine's, a brief visit was paid to some
NoBMAN Remains in Small Stbeet,
consisting of a portion of a 12th century house, described by Mr. Taylor
as " some clustered piers with cushioned capitals, of a wealthy citizen's
house, now incorporated in the Law Library, in Small Street," ' permis-
sion for the members to inspect which was granted. Remains of
domestic architecture of the Norman period are nowhere common, and
as this is, with one exception to be presently mentioned, the only
remaining example in Bristol, it is fortunate that it escaped destruction
during the reconstruction of the Law Courts some few years since,
lliough but a small fragment of the original Norman Hall, it is of much
interest, and seems to date from about the same period as the remains
in All Saints' Church, a short distance to the north of the house.
Little is known of the early history of the building, but in 1677 it was
the residence of Sir Henry Creswicke, who here entertained Queen
Catherine on her visit to Bristol, the city paying the expense.^ At the
Peiobt Chuboh of St. James
the Members were received by the Vicar, the Rev. J. Hart-Davis, M.A.,
who gave a brief account of the church, and of the destroyed Abbey
buildings, which he illustrated by a plan. Mr. T. S. Pope added some
remai'ks, especially referring to the ^^ restoration " of the building, some
years since, and then, imder the guidance of the Vicar, an inspection
' Briatol : Past and Present ^ ii. 27. * Evans, 227.
Proceedings, 1887-8. 281
was made of the few fragments of the old buildings that are still left,
built into or supporting modern or mediseval houses in the neighbour-
hood. The Norman arches of the Priory Church itself seem to belong
to an earlier period than some of the Romanesque work vi'^ited during
the day, but the most interesting portion of the architecture at St.
James*s is the well known beautiful little wheel-window, and the series
of intersectino: Norman arches in the west front, which have been
frequently illustrated in works on English architecture, and fortunately
still remain in fairly good condition.
Norman Remains in Nelson Street.
These had been included upon the programme of objects to be visited,
but could not be seen, owing to the absence from home of the owner ;
they were afterwards inspected by some of the members, when Mr.
Pope made a sketch of which he has given a copy for the Club Album.
'J hey consist of a couple of circular piers with fluted capitals now
supporting the ceiling of a cellar, but it is doubtful whether they
occupy their original position. The bases being underground it was
impossible to decide this point without excavatin<2:. With the exception
of these pillars and the Norman Font in St. Philip's Church, all the
known remains of Norman Bristol had been visited during the day.
EXCURSION TO
CARDIFF, LLANDAFP, AND CAERPHILLY.
On Wednesday, May 11th, 1887, an excursion took place to South
Wales, which was well attended by the members and their friends, who,
with the President (Bishop Clifford) left Clifton Down by the 9.10 a.m.
train, and proceeded by way of the recently opened Severn Tunnel to
Cardiff, where carriages were waiting to take them to the Castle, which,
by kind permission of the noble owner, the Marquis of Bute, was
thrown open to their inspection, llie ruins of the ancient Castle,
including the entrance Tower, the Keep, said to have been built by
Robert Earl of Gloucester, the builder of Bristol Castle, and the
foundations of the drawbridge and walls excavated recently by the
present Marquis, were examined and described by Mr. Corbett and
the Secretary. A full account of the remains having been published
by our distinguished fellow-citizen, Mr. George T. Clark, no more need
here be said.
Robebt Cubthose at Cabdiff Castle.
The story of the imprisonment and cruel treatment of Robert, Duke
of Normandy, in Cardiff Castle, having been mentioned, the Secretary
read a note from Professor J. Rowley, a member of the Club, who
wrote in reply to a letter on the subject, as follows : — " Not having
yet rejoined my books I can gratify your wish only from memory,
but I believe there is not even the shadow of a fact in the stories
of Duke Robert's ill-treatment by King Henry, or his jailors. The
8
282 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
entire weight of contemporary authority, so far as I remember, goes
to show that at all his places of captivity — Devizes, Bristol, Cardiff —
he was but too weU treated ; I do not think that there is a single hint
given to the contrary by a writer of his own time. If he became
blind — ^which is, perhaps, probable — he had mainly his excessive delight
in good living, aided perhaps by natural causes, to thank for it. It is, I
believe, as certain as anything merely historical can be, that no violence,
whether of his brother's prompting or not, was answerable for the
calamity — if it really befel him. The story of his being blinded is first
foimd, I think, some generations after his death. It doubtless was
the offspring of the usual parent of this kind of falsehood, popular
imagination stimulated by the appetite for horrors, and the tendency to
believe the worst of men in high places, who have dangerous persons in
their power, screened from the public eye by stone walls. The same
creative power was at work as has been the author of so many tales of
poisoned kings, queens, princesses and statesmen. There is a note on
the subject in Vol. v. of Freeman's Norman Conquest.^ I am bound to
say that Sir Francis Palgrave accepts the story of Robert's being
blmded. ' Did he think,' he says, somewhere in his Normandy and
Englatid, ' of the day when the glowing brass would wither his own
agonized eye-balls ? ' "
Mr. John Taylor stated that on a previous visit to the castle he had
been shewn not only the place where the blinding was accomplished, but
also the instrument with which it was done, the '* historic doubt *' on
the subject not having at that time reached Cardiff.
After a brief visit to the interior of the modem Castle, to see the
magnificent decorations and contents, including the wall paintings of
scenes from the history of Cardiff, by the late Mr. Burgess, R.A., and
other modern artists, the carriages were rejoined, and a drive of about
half an hour brought the party to
LLA.NDAFF CiLTHEDBAI..
In the absence of the Dean (Dr. Vaughan) who wrote to express hia
regret that his duties in London prevented his meeting the Club, the
members were received by Canon Hawkins, who gave a brief account of
the Cathedral, from its traditional foundation by St. Tewdric (or Myric)
king and martyr, in the 5th century, to the late very successful
restoration, from a partially roofless ruin to a grand old church. The
Norman arches, doors, and other architectural features, sculptures in
wood and stone, etc., were inspected, and special attention was called
by Col. Bramble and by Mrs. Bagnall-Oakeley to some peculiarities
in the costumes of the early ecclesiastical effigies.
Time did not permit of more than a brief glance at the ruins of the
s (• For 28 years he was a prisoner, moved from castle to castle at his brother's
will, but still treated, so at least his brother professed, with all the deference and
courtesy which his rank and his misfortunes might claim." (Norman Conqtusi,
V. 175.) ....*• All the contemporary English writers who speak of the matter,
describe Robert as being as well treated as a prisoner could be The story
seems to be simply one of the large class of exaggerations due to the mere love of
horrors A good many people were blinded in Henry's time
Neither Henry of Huntingdon nor Wace seem to have heard of the alleged
blinding." (Id. v. 849, 850.)
Proceedings, 1887-8. 283
Bishop's Palace, the gateway of which, built by Bishop Urban, adjoining
the church, was destroyed by Owain Glyndwr. After thanking Canon
Hawkins for his kind reception, the driye was continued up the valleys
of the Taff and the Ebbw, with beautiful views, at intervals, of moun-
tains, rivers, and lichly wooded vales, and
Caekphilly Castle
was reached about 3.15 p.m , where bv kind permission of the Marquis of
Bute, free admission was granted to toe party. On reaching the interior
of the castle, a most interesting account of the ancient and present state
of the fortress was given by Col. J. R. Bramble, F.S.A., which he
illustrated by large ground plans prepared for the occasion ; after which
the members walked round the ruins, and examined the remains of the
outer walls, with the buttresses and towers ; the gateway to the inner-
bailey; the great hall 70 feet by 80 feet; the celebrated '* leaning
tower ; " and other features ; under the guidance of Col. Bramble.
Though the castle is unrivalled in the extent and magnificence of its
ruins by any other in Wales, little is known of its history. A most
interesting account of the buildings and what is known of their history
was published in Bristol 1835-36, in the Wtit of England Journal of
Science and Literature^ by the editor, Mr. G. T. Clark, and has since
been reprinted in his work on Mediteval Military Architecture, This
contained a restored drawinjj of " Caerphilly Castle as it formerly stood,"
which has been frequently reproduced as an example of a typical
Edwardian Castle.
Returning to Cardiff by the 5.22 p.m. train from Caerphilly station,
dinner was served at the Park Hotel, after which the members returned
home by the 7.15 train, reaching Clifton Down soon after 9.0 from a
pleasant and successful excursion amongst some of the most interesting
of the Medieoval Antiquities of South Wales.
EXCURSION TO AXBRIDGE, COMPTON BISHOP,
WEDMORE, AND CHEDDAR.
Ok Monday, October 3rd, 1887, the second excursion of the year
was made, when twenty-six members and friends accompanied the
President to the Cheddar Valley. Leaving Bristol in a saloon carriage
by the 9.30 a.m. train, Axbridge was reached about 10.20.
The church, dedicated to St. John the Baptist, has recently been
restored. It is a handsome cruciform structure, chiefly of Perpendicular
date, consisting of nave, with north and south aisles, chancel, with north
and sputh chapels, central tower, and south porch. In the absence of the
Vicar, the Club was received by the Rev. G. D. W. Ommaney, who gave
some account of the building, and of the *^ restoration," which had only
just been completed. Col. Bramble followed with some remarks on the
internal architectural features, and especially noticed the curious remains
of chambers on the north side of the chancel, and at the west end
of the church, which he thought might have been used in former
times as Anchorholds. Col. Bramble promised some notes on this
284 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
subject for the Proct^dingz which we shall hope to print in anr next
volume.
In reply to Mr. Algernon Warren, it was stated by Mr. Salisbury,
one of the Churchwardens, that the ancient painting described by
Rutter {Somerset, p. 180), as formerly in the church — "a very curious
old painting on a piece of oak panelling, of the age of Edward III.,
representing the Saviour, with a pointed beard " — was still preserved in
the town, though it had been removed from the church. Mr. Salisbury
promised to show this painting to any members who might wish to see
it, if they would pay another visit to the town, when also the interesting
and very ancient charters and manuscripts preserved in the town chest
might be examined. The Secretary promised to give due notice to the
local authorities should their kind invitation be accepted, and several
members present expressed a wish to take part in the proposed inspec-
tion. On leaving the church, the interior of the Town Hall was looked
at ; it contains some old paintings, a curious piece of painted glass with
the quaint legend (Suit X\\t^.'% %t^xt of ^11, j^ane tl)e Council of t^ijif
Hall. In the basement, Mr. Robert H. Warren pointed out an ancient
metal table, or '* nail,'' similar to those in front of the Bristol Exchange,
which had probably been removed from the market place when the
Town Hall was rebuilt, about A.D. 1829. The Secretary showed an old
engraving of Axbridge Market Place, from a painting of the middle
of the last century, with the High Cross and some old houses since
destroyed, from which it appeared that the town was formerly much more
picturesque than it is at present. After thanking the local gentlemen
and others who had honoured the Club by their presence, and expressiog
a hope that another visit to Axbridge might soon take place, the
members mounted the carriages which were in waiting and drove to the
little village and Church of
CoMPTON Bishop,
picturesquely situated close under the miniature mountain known, from
the shape of its summit, as "Crook Peak," Mendip, frequently mis-
called " Crook's Peak.^* Here the church, dedicated to St. Andrew, was
seen, and the Secretary pointed out the leading architectural features,
the fine transition south doorway, probably of late 12th century date ;
the 12th century Font, the Early English work in the chancel, including
a double piscina beneath two tref oiled arches ; the carved stone pulpit
of early 15th century date, etc. The Churchyard Cross, figured by
Pooley (p. 47), was glanced at, and then, rejoining the carriages, the
drive was continued through the village of Weare, the church of which
ancient village some few of the members visited, and to
Wedmore.
The Rev. Sydenham Hervey received the party at the Vicarage, and
after showing them his interesting collection of antiquities from the
neighbourhood, including many fragments of pottery, etc., from
excavations on the site of what was at one time supposed to have been
King Alfred's palace, those present were most hospitably entertained at
luncheon Bishop Clifford having thanked the Vicar for his very kind
Proceedings, 1887-8. 285
reception of the Club, a yisit was then paid to the very interesting
church of St. Mary, where the details both of the exterior and interior
of the building, its monuments, curious fresco painting, handsome iron-
work on the south door, churchyard cross, etc., were examined under
the guidance of the Vicar, and of Bishop Clifford and Col. Bramble.
The latter has since extended his remai*ks into a monograph of the
church, which is printed at pp. 178-192.
The yery fine Village Cross, one of the most beautiful and perfect of
those remaining in Somersetshire, was then visited, and was much
admired. It is well illustrated by Mr. Pooley, Crosses of Somerset,
pp. 114, 115, where it is fully described as a nearly perfect Cross of late
14th century date. Historically (or traditionally) the Cross is inte-
resting, as upon it Judge Jeffreys is said to have hanged a local doctor,
because he had helped to dress the wounds of a d3ring Puritan The
Cross then stood in another part of the village, near the Shambles.
Cheddab.
On reaching the picturesquely situated village of Cheddar, the first
object of antiquarian interest noticed was the fine old Market Cross,
which is well known from the accoimts and illustrations of it published
by Britton, Pooley,^ and others. It is curiously constructed, '* the central
column and the socket being octagonal on plan, while the roof, arches
and steps are hexagonal, and of a much later date." 7 It was partly
rebuilt m 1834, and having since been somewhat neglected is again
getting out of repair. It was understood that the Cross was shortly to
be restored by a local landowner.
The next place visited was the parish Church of St. Andrew, where
the party was met by the Vicar, the Kev. John Coleman, M.A., who,
after conducting them round the outside of the building, and calling
their attention to the chief interesting features of the exterior, led the
way to the west end, where the beautiful Tower was much admired. Mr.
Freeman has described this tower as a noble one of its kind, *' where
the turret stands out very prominently, and its pinnacle soars above all
the rest, but a buttress and pinnacle, like those of the other angles,
creeps up by the side of it." It much resembles the western tower of
Banwell Church, and like it has on its western face sculptures repre-
senting the ** Annunciation." On reaching the interior of the church
an interesting account of the building and its history was given by the
Vicar, which has been printed at pp. 175-179. Some discussion took
place on the heraldic bearings in the painted glass from various windows
m the nave, now preserved in the south chapel. Col. Bramble, Bishop
Clifford and others taking part. Fragments of a representation of the
Annimciation remain in the east window of this chapel, and among the
saints in the south window pointed out by Bishop Clifford were St.
Barbara and St. Catherine. The stone monument, described by Col-
linson, as formerly in this chapel, with the inscription, " Here lyeth the
body of Edmund Rooe, esq. ; who departed this life the 27th of March,
A.D., 1595," has since been destroyed, but a portion of it is preserved,
on which are sculptured the Rooe arms and other bearings, on shields
within quatrefoils.
^ Pooley, Crosses of Somerset, 169. ' Proc, Somerset Archl, Soc., II. ii. 58.
^86 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
The monumental brass of Sir Thomas de Cheddar, knight and
burgess of Bristol, in which city he was born A.D. 1380, has been
figured in this volume (p. 39), as a good example of the armour of the
period.
The fine stone pulpit painted in colours, and some remains of carved
woodwork were examined, after which, the necessary permission having
been obtained by the Vicar, the members visited and inspected the
remains of the old Manor House, near the railway station, which is said
by Rutter to have been *' the Hall of the Manor House of John de
Cheddar now used," (A.D. 1829), '*as a stable and granary." It still
remains "tolerably entire," and might be easily restored; but it is
supposed by some recent authorities to have been the chapel rather
than the hall of the Manor. Circumstances did not permit of a settle-
ment of the question on the present occasion.
After passing a hearty vote of thanks to the Vicar for his kind
reception and interesting remarks, the members made their way to
the railway station, where dinner was partaken of, after which they
returned home by the train leaving Cheddar at 6.6 p.m., and reaching
Bristol at 7.30, the autumn excursion, though rather later in the year
than usual, having been much enjoyed by those present.
MEETING, NOVEMBER 24th, 1887.
Bishop Clifford, Pbesident, in thb Chaib.
Mr. F. F. Tuckett exhibited a bronze medal which has been in the
possession of his family for a Ions period, and is described as follows,
by Lord Stanhope in his Life of Pxtty iv. 216 : —
" Napoleon also directed M. Denon, then at the head of the French
Mint, to prepare a medal in commemoration of his expected conquest
The die being made accordingly, was ready to be used in London, but
owing to the course of events it was subsequently broken. Only three
medals struck from it now, as I have heard, remain, — ^two in France, and
one in England. There has been, however, an imitation cast, and of
these copies I have two in bronze. The medal bears on one side the
usual head of the Emperor, crowned with laurel. On the reverse
Hercules appears, lifting up and crushing in his arms the monster
Anteus : the motto being *' Descente en Angleterre^ and below, in
smaller letters, Frappi {sic) a Londre en 1804." Of this ihedal Lanfrey
remarks — '' La devise porte : ' Descente en Ant^leterrCy et au dessous en
petits caracteres *f rappee d Londres in 1804.' Cette legende raenteuse,
6temal monument de la presomption de celui qui la fit frapper, fut tout
ce qui resta de la grande expedition." {Histoire de Napoleon I, iii. 301.)
Professor James Rowley said the medal had been eng^ved, and an
illustration of it appeared at the head of Chapter XXIX. of the
Students History of France, where the inscription is given as Frappi d
Londre (sic) on the obverse, Jeuferoy fedty Denon Direxit on the other
side. Mr. Tuckett's specimen has on the obverse : —
I
DROZ FECIT
DENON DEEUBXI (tio).
Proceedings, 1887-8. 287
Mr. Tuckett also showed a curiously carved ivory tobacco-stopper, with
secret profile portrait of Louis XVI., a relic of the French Revolution.
The Secretary exhibited a brass signet ring of the latter part of the
15th century, with the sacred monogram thrice repeated, and the initials
J.R. It had recently been ploughed up in a field at Southrop,
Gloucestershire, on a farm occupied by Mr. W. J. Edmonds.
The Secretary also exhibited, by permission of the authorities of the
Bristol Museum, a large carved wooden bracket from ^* The Fourteen
Stars" an ancient hostelry formerly standing at the Counterslip. It
somewhat resembles those figured m Skelton's Antiquities of Bristol
\Plate 21], from St. Peter's Hospital. It was shewn — with several
engravings and books on Old Bristol, also lent from the Museum and
Library — in illustration of the first paper of the evening, **0n Ancient
Woodwork in Bristol and the West of England," by Mr. Thomas S.
Pope, which was also further illustrated by a number of drawings taken
by the author from the remains themselves. Mr. Pope's paper will be
pHnted in our next volume.
The Rev. Charles S. Taylor followed with a paper on The Rules of
St. Thomas Vestry in 1562," from an ancient docimient remaining in
the church. These were *' constitutions made and ordained by the
proctors and major sort of the parishioners of St. Thomas within
Bristowe, and foreproctors of the same parish church, concluded at a
vestry there, holden within the same parish church the xxth day of
January, anno domini 1562, to be observed and obeyed as a law of all
those that from henceforth shall be chosen proctors of the said parish
church hereafter for ever, by the ordinance of these men whose names be
hereunder written." These names extended back through the whole
period of the Reformation. The accounts of 1544, the oldest which
they possessed, contained entries relating to the old unreformed service
of the Church of England, receipts for cross and bells, and payments for
the sepulchre light, for bearing up the copes in procession, for holy
water, springalls, etc. No doubt the ordinances were not a new set of
constitutions framed at the time, but rather a declaration of customs
which had been long observed, but which it seemed well to place on
record at a time when the old order in things ecclesiastical was changing
and giving place to a new one. It was a very remarkable thins that
these ordinances were strictly followed so far as the altered circum-
stances of the times would permit, and yet their observance was entirely
owing to the traditions of successive generations of vestrymen. In
1566, on the occasion of the sealing of the lease of the new waterpipe,
the vestry provided for the parishioners " wine, fruit, biscuits, caraways,
and other things at a cost of v.s. ix^. ; " but any excuse was good
enough for a drinking, from the presenting of a dead chantry priest to
a bishop's visitation. In 1746 Mr. Thomas Brent spent l7s. 6d. in
'' washing down the oath " of admission. The chief points of interest
in these 15th century rules were that they showed that the customs of
the vestry of St. Thomas were now exactly what they were 325 years
ago, and that they suggested the question whether the customary
powers which even then belonged to the vestry had not grown out of a
previous state of things when the parishes had possessed a greater
interest in the management of the afEairs of the church than they did in
1562 or now. There must be in some of the old city churches other
papers which would throw light on the condition of vestries before the
288 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Keformation. The Secretary said he had one such paper in his
possession, a transcript from a document dated 1524, formerly in
St. Stephen s Church, Bristol, which had kindly been contributed by
Alderman Francis F. Fox, a member of the Club, who regretted he was
not able to attend the meeting. The Secretary then read this interesting
document, on the conclusion of which the Eev. C. S. Taylor pointed
out that the paper bore out what he had said, that the parishioners
had more power in the .management of the affairs of the parish, and
showed how the restry gradually encroached on the rights of the
people. Both these papers are printed in this volume (see Ancient
Bristol Documents^ Nos. VI. and VII.), with some supplementary notes
by Mr. Taylor.
Mr. Pope haying called attention to the condition of the fine old
wooden screen, formerly in the Hall of Clapton Court, Somerset, now
exposed to the weather in the garden, and covered with ivy, the
Secretary was requested to call the attention of the owner to the
matter, and to ask him whether it could not be removed, under cover, as
under present circumstances this most interesting screen will soon be
utterly destroyed. The late Mr. Parker in his Domestic Architecture
(Part 2, p. 338) says: — ''It is probably the most remarkable piece of
early wooden domestic screen work in existence." A good engraying
of the screen from a drawing taken in 1859, by the uite Mr. £. W.
Godwin, F.S.A., was published in the Archteological Journal^ vol. xvii.
p. 129. At that date it occupied its original site at the end of the
hall in Clapton Court.
MEETING, DECEMBER 20th, 1887.
Bishop Cliffobd, Pbesident, in the Chaib.
The 20th General meeting of the Club was held at the Museimi and
Library, on the afternoon of Tuesday, December 20th, and was well
attended.
The Hon. and Rev. Walter I. Clifford, S.J., exhibited a large and
valuable collection of drawings and other illustrations of Ancient
Church Needlework, consisting chiefly of embroidered Copes, of the 13th,
14lh, and 15th centuries, many of which were of English make; and
gave an account of the chief peculiarities of the most interesting
specimens. Mrs. Bagnall-Oakeley, Bishop Clifford. Col. Bramble, and
the Secretary added some remarks, and asked some questions, which
were responded to by Father Clifford. The paper with some Notes on
Stitches by Mrs. Bagnall-Oakeley wiU be found at pp. 229 — 240.
In the Middle Ages the celebrated Opus Ajiglicum was in great
request on the Continent, as well as in our own country, and therefore
at the Reformation many of the finest Copes and other vestments which
had been in use in our churches and monasteries, found their way to
Kome, Spain, and other coimtriss, where some of them are still in use,
having been cut up and made into Chasubles and other vestments.
Father Clifford's restorations, in their original colotirs, of some of these
transformed Copes were much admired.
Proceedings, 1887-8. 289
Colonel Bramble, F.S.A., V.P., exhibited, and made some remarks
upon a curious stirrup of hammered iron, one of a pair lent him by
Mr. Pritchard, of Gotham. It was supposed to be of 16th century date,
and from the smallness of the aperture for the foot, it was suggested
that the stirrups had belonged either to a child, or to a lady.
Mr. Francis F. Tuckett, read a paper, which is printed at pp. 207-
216, on '' Somt Optical Peculiarities of Ancient Stained Glass, and Mr.
S. Cashmore, Mr. Bell (visitor), and others took part in. the discussion
which followed. Some specimens of old glass were shown in illus-
tration, including a piece &om Titian s House, at Cadore, Italy.
Mr. Tuckett abo made some further remarks on the copy of a French
war medal, which he had exhibited at the last meeting. The original
impressions of the medal with the inscription Frappi d Londres^ which
had been prepared for Napoleon in readiness for his conquest of
England, have since disappeared. Fortunately a bronze copy was struck
at Birmingham, by Droz, about A.D. 1810, of which Mr. Tuckett's was
an impression. It differs from the original in some respects, but is
interesting as a memorial of Napoleonic presumption.
A paper by Mr. John Latimer on Bristol Commerce in the 14M and
15/A centuries was, on account of the lateness of the hour *' taken as
read/' and is printed at pp. 217—228.
FOUETH ANNUAL MEETING.
LiBUT.-CoL. James R. Bbakble, F.S.A., V.P., in the Chaib.
The Fourth Annual Meeting was held at the Museimi and Library,
on Wednesday, January 18th, 1888, the chair being taken, in the
absence of the President on the Continent, by Col. Bramble, V.P.
The Secretary stated that three members, Mr. William Adlam, F.S.A.,
Dr. Langley, and Mr. H. M. Herapath, had sent in their resignations,
not being able to attend the meetings. There being five yacancies the
following gentlemen were then hallo tted for and elected, viz., Sir John
Maclean, F.S.A., Clifton; Mr. R. A. Charleton, Clifton; Mr. C. J.
Cruddas, Stoke Bishop; Mr. £. J. Swann, Leigh Woods; and Mr.
J. F. Eberle, Clifton.
llie Treasurer, Mr. John Williams, read a statement of receipts and
expenditure during the year, showing a small balance in favour of the
Club ; very few subscriptions were in arrear.
The election of Officers for the year then took place, the President,
Vice-Presidents, Treasurer, and Secretary being re-elected, and the
Rev. B. H. Blacker, M.A., Mr. A. T. Martin, M.A., Mr. A. C. Pass, and
Mr. R. Hall Warren being elected on the Committee.
A paper on The Misereres in Bristol Cathedral was then read by
Mr. R. H. Warren, in which he showed that several of the carvings
represent scenes from the story of "Reynard the Fox," a popular
romance of the Middle Ages. The paper, which is printed at pp. 241-
260, was illustrated by drawings and photographs. In the discussion
which followed, the Chairman, the Treasurer, Mr. Pope, and the Secretary
took part, and the last named showed some illustrations of somewhat
290 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
similar carvings from Gloucester, Hereford, and Wells Cathedrals,
Malvern Abbey and other churches. Also lithographs of some of the
Bristol misereres kindly lent him by Mr. John lAvars, who had
published them several years ago, in a work on Bristol Cathedral, now
become scarce.
It was proposed and carried unanimously that the Secretary be
requested to write to the Very Rev. the Dean of Bristol, to call his
attention to the remains of the (h-gan screen now lying in the church-
yard at the back of the Cathedral, where they have been since their
removal from the church in 1861 ; and to express a hope that the
screen, which dates ftom about the year 1541, having on it the initials
of Edward, Prince of Wales, and also the monument to Sir John and
Lady Young, which was removed from the Chancel at the same time,
may be re -erected in some part of the precincts of the Cathedral.
[Copies of this resolution were forwarded to the Dean and to Arch-
deacon Norris, and a reply was received from the latter, saying that the
matter should receive consideration.]
MEETING IN BRISTOL— EARLY ENGLISH REMAINS.
On Tuesday, March 6th, 1888, the second meeting of the Club in
Bristol took place, for the purpose of inspecting the architectural
remains of the 12th and 13th centuries, and was attended by nearly
thirty members and friends.
At 11.30 a.m. the Venerable the Archdeacon (Dr. Norris) met the
Sarty in the Chapter Room of the Cathedral, and after some intro-
uctory remarks, in which he alluded to the interesting nature of the
architecture of that beautiful chamber and its adjoining vestibule,
showing the transition from the late Romanesque or Norman style of
the 12th century to the 1st Pointed Gothic, or Early English, Dr. Norris
enumerated the remains of the 1 3th century architecture now to be seen
in the Cathedral, which were afterwards inspected by the members under
his guidance. The beautiful Early English doorway to the Monastic
Refectory in the south wall of the Cloister (of which Mr. Pope has
presented a drawing, taken by himself some years ago, for the Club
album), some fragments of the 13th century work in the north Transept,
the earliest of the Berkeley effigies, and last, and most beautiful of all,
the Elder Chapel of Our Lady, on the north-east side of the Cathedral,
were visited and examined. An interesting point in connection with
this building was alluded to by the Archdeacon, upon which he said he
should be glad of the opinion of those present, viz. : — whether at its
first erection the south wall of the Chapel had been detached from
the north wall of the Norman Church, leaving the beautiful lancet
windows on the south side, now walled up, free and open to the
light. If so the effect of these lancets on three sides of the chapel,
aU filled with richly coloured 13th century glass, must have been
magnificent. Mr. Pope, Sir John Maclean, F.S.A., Mr. A. E. Hudd,
F.8.A., and other members having made some remarks on the subject, it
was decided, with the Archdeacon's consent, to go more fully into the
nialter^ and to make a more minute examination of the masonry on
Proceedings, 1887-8. 291
some future occasion, with a view to settling the qu estion which bears
also upon another disputed point, the original width of the Norman
Church. (See Mr. Pope's paper on the subject, pp. 251-256.)
St. Mabk's Chubch.
The Archdeacon then accompanied the members across the Green to
the Church of St. Mark, where he favoured them with some account of
the proposed alterations shortly to be undertaken in that building.
In reply to Sir John Maclean, it was stated that the old floor level was
not to be retained, and that considerable alterations were to be made in
the ancient ground plan, under which circumstances Sir John main-
tained that the term '* restoration '* was a misnomer.
Mr. W. E. Jones gave a brief account of the 13th century remains of
the building, and was followed by Mr. John Taylor on the history of the
foundation. The Hospital of St. Mark, of Billeswick, was founded before
the year 1229, by Maurice de Gaunt, a grandson of the founder of
St. Augustine's, for the relief of the poor, and was placed under the
rule of the Abbot and Canons of that Abbey. Mr. Alfred Hudd, F.S.A.,
also made a few remarks, chiefly on the statement, so often repeated in
the accounts of the hospital, that it was a house of the Bonhommes.
Leland is the only authority for this statement, which is probably a
mistake, aa also is his statement that the house was *' founded by Henry
de Gaunt, priest, brother of Maurice de Gaunt, Kt." {Collectanea^ i. 85.)
In his Church History (Book vi., Chops. 24, 25,) Fuller says the only
houses known to him belonging to this Order were amongst the richest
in the land, the one at Ashridge, in Buckinghamshire, the other at
Edington, in Wilts. The brothers of St. Mark's, although they may have
been good men were probably not connected with the Bonhommes. It
would almost appear from the account given of the costume of the brethren
(see paper by Mr. John Taylor in the Transactions of the Bristol and Glou-
cester Archl, Soc^, \ol, iii., p. 241), that in some particulars they differed
from any known branch of the Augustinians. In a paper published in
the Journal of the British Archaeological Association, in 1874, Mr.
T. Blashill sugi^ests that the reformed rule of St. Augustine as followed
by the Bonhommes might have been adopted at St. Mark's, while the
Hospital retained its independence of the Order.
Col. Bramble, F.S.A., gave a short account of the heraldic tiles found
a few years ago on the site of the north transept of the Church, which
tiles are to be replaced when the Church is "restored." We hope to
publish Col. Bramble's notes on this subject in a future part, and also a
paper by Mr. W. E. Jones on the architecture of the building.
After looking at the exterior of the Church, and admiring the Early
English Corbel-table and windows remaining on both sides of the
building, the members proceeded to the Royal Hotel, College Green,
where luncheon was partaken of. The remains of
St. Babtholomew's Hospital
were next visited, where some notes were read by the Secretary. The
Hospital was founded as a Prioryof Canons Regular, by an ancestor of
Lord de la Warr, according to Wm. Wyrcestre, but was, in his time,
(c. 1470) an hospital for the poor. The most interesting portion of the
292 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Hospital which remains is the well-known doorway, with defaced
effigies of the Virgin and Child, and an Early English arcade inside,
leading to a second round-headed doorway. The ciiapel, which was
about 54 feet long, has entirely disappeared, and so have the other
buildings of the hospital, they having been destroyed in the 16th century
for Thome's '' free school of grammar,'' which was originally founded
on this site, in Christmas Street.
St. Maby Redcliff.
On leaving St. Bartholomew's the members proceeded by way of the
Idth century City Portal, known as *'the Blind Gate," which is so
nearly covered with modern buildings that only a fragment of the gato
itself is visible, and through St. John Street, High Street, and RedclifE
Street, to the North Porch of St. Mary Redcliff, where the Vicar, the
Rev. C. £. Cornish, was waiting to receive them. Here the beautiful
Early English work of the Inner North Porch, and some few remains of
the same date in the tower and elsewhere were examined. Also the late
Idth century effigy now in the north transept, respecting which
Col. Bramble made a few remarks.
Bbistol Castle.
After thanking the Vicar for his kind reception, the members next
made their way to Tower Street, where the remains of Bristol Castle
were inspected — including some vaults formerly overlooking the Frome,
now in the occupation of Messrs. Phillips & Co., which few of those
present had previously visited.
Dr. Beddoe, F.R.S., said they were supposed to have been used by
the soldiers of the garrison. Much regret was expressed that the ISUi
century fragment of the Royal Palace, among the most interesting of
the ancient historical monuments of Bristol, was not taken more care of
by the City authorities. Partially occupied as a stable and partly as
miserable lodging houses — sad is the fate that has befallen the last
relics of this ancient residence of kings and princes, of many noble
knights and fair dames, whose names are written, not only in our local
histories, but who took an active part in ** the making of England," at
the time when Bristol was the chief city of the land after the great
metropolis itself.
St. Philip's Chukch.
At the Church of St. Philip and Jacob, the Rector, the Rev. G. B.
James, received the party, and after looking at the Norman font
(an engraving of which will be found in the work on Baptismal Fonts^
edited by Paley,) and the Norman tombstone now in the north aisle of
the chancel, the remains of the 13th century architecture in the lower
stages of the tower and at the east end of the nave, were examined.
The church appears to have originally been cruciform, a portion of the
Early English north transept remaining on the north side of the
tower.
Proceedings, 1887-8. 293
DOMIKICAX FbIARY.
The last visit of the somewhat long programme was the Dominican
Friary, Merchant Street, the remains of which were examined, under
the guidance of Mr. John Taylor. The huildings being unoccupied at
the time, a favourable opportimity was given the members to examine
this interesting foundation of Maurice de Gaunt, one of the earliest
homes of the Dominicans in this country, it having been established
about the year 1 230, a few years only after the death of St. Dominic.
A paper on the Priory and its History, by Mr. John Taylor, will be foimd
in the third volume of the Transactions of the Bristol and Gloucester
Archeeological Society. A very interesting account of this foundation
has been published by the Rev. C. F. R. Palmer, under the title of
the Friar 'Preacher 8^ or Blackfriars of Bristol, in the April number of
the Reliquary,
MEETING AT BRISTOL CATHEDRAL.
On Wednesday, March 28th, 1888, the Venerable the Archdeacon,
Dr. J. P. Norris, met the following members of the Club, in the Elder
Chapel of Our Lady. Sir John Maclean, F.S.A., Mr. Thomas S. Pope,
architect, Mr. John Reynolds, Col Bramble, F.S.A., V.P., and Alfred
E. Hudd, F.S.A., Secretary.
After spending a considerable time in examining the building both
inside and out, several indications of the Chapel having been originally
detached from the Norman north aisle, as suggested by Dr. Norris at
the recent meeting of the Club, were noticed, and Mr. Pope promised to
prepare a short paper on the subject for publication in the Proceedings^
which is printed at pp. 251-256.
EXCURSION TO
BACKWELL, NAILSEA COURT, AND CHELVEY.
On Saturday, May 26th, the first excursion for the year 1888 took
place, when about twenty members and friends started from Clifton at
1 p.m., and drove across the Suspension Bridge into the neighbouring
county of Somerset. By kind permission of Sir Greville Smyth, Bart.,
the little known earthworks in Ashton Park were first visited, imder
the guidance of the Secretary.
AsHTON Camp.
Mr. Hudd stated that though these earthworks were not marked on the
Ordnance Maps, and seemed when he first enquired about them to have
been quite unknown to the modem residents at Ashton, they had long
since been described under the name of "Ashton Camp," both by
Seyer and Rutter. The groimd is thickly overgrown with trees and
underwood, which makes it difficult to ascertain the exact form and
plan of the earthworks, but it seems to consist of a considerable space of
294 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
imeyen ground enclosed by a bank and ditch, and may have been
occupied, as suggested by Seyer, by the same race as the much stronger
fortress " Burgh walls," a little farther to the north, and with which
it seemed to have been connected by a raised bank still yisible.
Backwell.
The next visit, after a pleasant drive of half an hour, was to the fine
church of St. Andrew, Back well, where, in the unavoidable absence of
the Rector, the Rev. Prebendary Burbidge, the members were received
by Mr. T. W. Jacques, who pointed out some of the most interesting
features of the church. A paper on the Architecture of the Building^
written by the Rector, was read by Mr. Jacques, in which the writer
caUed attention to the examples of the four styles of English architec-
ture to be seen in the church ; to the monuments ; the carved oak
screen ; the mutilated Norman font, and other details ; and also to the
curious inscription on the Western face of the Tower. This inscription
has long been a puzzle to antiquaries, and has been variously trans-
lated. The Rector had taken some trouble to get the puzzle solved, and
had sent a rubbing of the inscription to some experts in London, who
have suggested tbe following reading : — *J\^%' j&p^^ I ®' ICit., t.e.,
John Sped (Speed) Jesus Christ, (15)52. This differs considerably
from the reading given by Rutter {Delineations, p. 20) and other writers,
but may be correct. John Speed may possibly have been the architect
of the upper portion of the tower, which was built about the middle of
the 16th century. In the churchyard the fine old Cross was looked at«
and after a passing glance at the few remaining fragments of Backwell
Court, still standing near the east end of the Church, the carriages were
remounted. A visit was then paid to
Nailsea Court,
the very picturesque old mansion familiar to passengers on the Great
Western Railway, from its situation a few yards north of the line just
beyond the Nailsea station. It was probably built by George Perceval,
about 1550, who sold it in 1582, to Richard Cole, mayor of Bristol in
1585, who resided here with his wife Alice (Carr), sister of John Carr,
the founder of Queen Elizabeth's Hospital, Bristol. The initials R. C.
and A. C. are still on one of the stone mantel-pieces in the house.
From the Coles the Court passed to the Wades, one of whom ** Major*'
Wade, is well known in Bristol history in connection with *' Traitor's
Bridge," and " Wade Street." The story of his han^^ing himself in one
of the upper rooms at Nailsea Court is untrue. There is a very fine old
door in one of the rooms, and other bits of carved woodwork were
noticed on the premises. The late Rector of Nailsea, the Rev. F. Brown,
published a good account of the History and Antiquities of Nailsea
Court, with genealogical notes, in the 32nd volume of the Journal of the
Bristol ArchiBological Association, from which some extracts were read
by the Secretary. A short walk across the meadows brought the party to
Chelvey Chubgh,
an interesting old building dedicated to St. Bridget, where the
members were received by the Rector the Rev. J. W. Leach, and by
Proceedings, 1887-8. 295
Col. Bramble, F.S.A., who had been unable to take part in the
proceedings earlier in the day. An account was given by Col. Bramble
of the architectural features of the church, to which the Rector added a
few remarks, and expressed his satisfaction that the recent extensive
repairs to the building were approved by the Club ; he said that great
care had been taken not to destroy any of the old work that it was
possible to retain. We hope to publish an account of the church in
our next volume. The B^ctor and Mrs. Leach then most hospitably
entertained the members at tea on the Rectory lawn, and, after thanking
them for their kind reception, a brief visit was made to the fine old
Tithe Barn of the 15th century, and to the remains of the fine old
mansion of the Tyntes, " Chelvey Court," where the members were
received by Mr. and Mrs. Williams, who threw the whole of the
buildings open to their inspection. Much of the old woodwork and
other fittings remain, but more has perished.
On the road home a brief halt was made at Flax Bourton to see the
curious Norman doorway in the little church, dedicated to St. Michael (?),
and returning thence by way of Ashton Park, Clifton was reached about
8 p.m., after a very pleasant excursion.
EXCURSION TO
WITHINGTON, CHEDWORTH ROMAN VILLA, Etc.
On Friday, July 6th, 1888, the second carriage excursion for the year
was taken, when a party of members and friends accompanied the
President (Bishop Clifford) to the Cotswold Hills. Leaving Clifton
Down in a saloon carriage by the morning express, Cheltenham was
reached soon after 10, and the members at once proceeded in carriages
to Dowdeswell, where the exterior of the fine cruciform Perpendicxuar
church and of the old manor farm were looked at in passing; the
remains of Dowdeswell Camp, supposed to have been connected with the
Roman station of Wycomb, about a mile distant, were also noticed.
Several leaden coffins have been found in this parish, placed north and
south, a little beneath the surface of the ground, and probably of Roman
date. Proceeding along the Roman road for a few miles in a south-
easterly direction, the very picturesque village of
WiTHINGTON
was reached. Here was discovered, in 1811, an extensive Roman villa,
from which some fine fragments of Mosaic pavements are now preserved
in the British Museum. The handsome cruciform Norman church of
St. Michael was examined under the guidance of the Rector, the Hon.
and Rev. G. G. C. Talbot. A curious niche in the north waU of the
chancel which the late Mr. Lysons thought might have been for '* the
heart *' of some person unknown, was removed to the chancel when the
church was restored, and was then found to cover some small bones,
apparently of a human hand. It was suggested that this might have
been a relic of some local saint, or possibly the *' sword hand " of some
296 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Crusader, whose other remains were left in the Holy Land. An effigy
outside the south wall of the chancel Bishop Clifford thought might
he that of a 14th century priest. The church is a fine cruciform
structure of Norman date, with beautiful north and south doorways
with chevron mouldings, a couple of Early English lancet wiudo'vrs
in the chancel (one of which is curious, being much wider at the
bottom than the top), a Decorated recess for a tomb in the^south wall, a
good central tower and clerestory in the Perpendicular style, and some
interesting monuments. The Rev. Charles Taylor, who was unable to
attend the meeting, had written to call attention to the fact that the
ground occupied by Withington Church had been devoted to religious
uses for a longer period than almost any other site in the county, the
manor having been g^ven for the foundation of a Saxon nunnery, about
1200 years ago, by Ethelred, son of Penda, King of Mercia, with
reversion to Worcester Cathedral, and being still held by the Dean and
Chapter of Worcester. The last Saxon abbess of the nunnery is said to
have been Saint Ethelburga, A.D. 774. The Rector pointed out the
supposed site of the monastery, of which few traces are now visible,
and also called the attention of the members to an old house in the
village, now used as the police station, containing a good open timber
roof of the 16th century and other ancient features.
The President having thanked the Rector for his kind reception,
and congratulated him on the successful and conservative '* restora-
tion" which the church had undergone some few years since, the
carriages were remounted and the drive continued to the splendid
Roman villa belonging to and so carefully preserved by Lord Eldon, in
Chedworth Wood. Here is a most interesting account of the
Chedwobxh Roman Villa
was given by Mr. Alfred Martin, M.A., illustrated with plans, and a map
of the Roman roads and remains in the surroimding district prepared for
the purpose, copies of which were given to all present. Mr. Martin referred
to the theory recently advanced by Mr. Fox, F.S.A., that the extensive
buildings on the north side had been used as a " fulling and dyeing
establishment '' in late Roman times, which he considered to be the most
probable explanation yet offered of these buildings. Limcheon having
been partaken of at the villa, the beautiful pavements, baths, and the
contents of the museum, with the early Christian inscriptions and other
interesting objects found during the excavation of the remains, were
examined. We hope to print Mr. Martin's paper in our next volume.
Returning by another road, from which beautiful views were obtained
of the surrounding country, a brief halt was made at the " Seven
springs,'' one of the sources of the River Thames, and on reaching Chel-
tenham, high tea was served at the Plough hotel, after which the party
returned to Clifton by the 6.36 express, and arrived at Clifton Down
about 8. The weather, though not exactly such as might be expected in
July, was fairly good, and though heavy rain fell in some parts of the
neighbourhood, the archajologists had no need to make use of the water-
proofs and umbrellas with which most of them came provided.
-v
Index.
297
INDEX.
4»»4»3«»34-
Amesbury Pxioiy Church viflited, 162.
Anglo-Norman Church Doorways, paper
by John Taylor, 4 ; discussion on, 67.
Ancient Bristol Documents, I. Bristol
Local Act of Parliament passed during
the Protectorate, for levying Rates for
maintenance of Ministers, and grant-
ing St. Ewen's Church for a Public
Library ; with Notes by Col. Bramble,
61 ; 77.
II. A Curious Deed belonging to the
Parish of St. Mary-le-Port ; with
notes by Col. Bramble, 77 ; 186.
III. From the Becords of St.
Nicholas Parish ; with notes by
Col. Bramble, 142.
IV. On some Old Deeds belonging
to the Church of St. Thomas ; with
notes by the Rev. C. S. Taylor,
Vicar, 161 ; 167.
V. From the Records of St. Mary-le-
Port; with notes by Col. Bramble, 169.
VI. Regulations of the Vestry of
St. Thomas in 1668 ; with notes by
. Rev. 0. S. Taylor, 198.
VII. Regulations of the Vestry of
St. Stephen in 1624, communicated
by Alderman F. F. Fox; with notes
by the Rev. 0. S. Taylor, 198; 198.
Armour, paper on, by Col. Bramble,
illustrated, 89 ; 79.
Ashton Court and Church visited, 68;
Church and Bam illustrated, Plate
VIII.
Ashton Camp and Park visited, 298.
Avebuiy , Megalithio Remains and Church
visited, 80.
Azbridge visited, 288 ; the Church, the
Town Hall, &c., 284.
Backwell visited, 294 ; Mr. Jacques at,
294; the Inscription on the Church
Tower, 294.
Barrow Qumey Court and Church visited,
69 ; Heraldic Tiles found at, 70.
Blacker, Rev. B. H., elected on Com-
mittee, 289.
Bonhommes, the, 291.
Bowood Park visited, 80.
Bramble, Lieut.-Col. James R., elected
Treasurer, 8 ; re-elected, 79 ; 166 ; on
the Wansdyke, 80; exhibits ancient
Cope from Yatton, 82 ; paper on the
Cope printed, 92 ; Paper on Medissval
Armour, 89 ; 79 ; Ancient Bristol
Documents, No. I., 61 ; No. II., 136 ;
No. ni., 142 ; 166 ; at Yatton Church,
167 ; exhibits a seal of Bruton
Grammar School, 166 ; Ancient Bristol
Documents, No. V., 169; on the
Church of St. Mary the Virgin,
Wedmore, 178; elected Vice-Presi-
dent, 277; re-elected, 289; reads
paper on Caerphilly Castle, 288;
exhibits old Iron Stirrup, 289 ; on
Heraldic Tiles from St. Mark's Hos-
pital, 291 ; at Chelvey Church, 269.
Beddoe, Dr. John, F.R.S., elected Hon.
Member, 8 ; paper on the Constructors
of Stanton Drew Circles, Maes Knoll
Camp, and the Wansdyke, 12; at
Stanton Drew, 74 ; paper on the
Human Remains from Stonoy Little-
ton Barrow, 104 ; the said Remains
exhibited, from the Bristol ^luseum,
166; elected Vice-President, 277;
re-elected, 289.
Bristol, paper on the Elder Lady
Chapel of Bristol Cathedral, by Mr.
T. S. Pope, 261.
Bristol, Meetings in, 278—281; 290—
293; St. Peter's Church, 278; All
Saints' Church, 279 ; the Cathedral,
279 ; 290 ; Norman Remains in Small
Street, 280; St. James's Priory
Church, 280; Norman Remains
in Nelson Street, 281; St. Mark's
Church, 291; St. Bartholomew's
Hospital, 291 ; St. Mary Redcliff, 292 ;
Remains of the Castle, 292 ; St.
Philip's Church, 292 ; the Dominican
Friary, 298 ; the Elder Lady Chapel,
298. (See iJso Ancient Bristol Docu-
ments, Old Iron Work, Old Carved
Chests, &c.),
Browne, Rev. G. F., his tracing of the
Saxon Font at Deerhurst, exhibited, 82.
Burder, Dr. G. F., elected on Com-
mittee, 8 ; Audits Accounts, 77.
Butterworth, Rev. Geo. Notes on the
early history of Deerhurst, 22 ; receives
the Club at Deerhurst Church, 76.
Cserphilly Castle visited, 283; Col.
Bramble on, 283.
Calne Church visited, 81.
Cardiff Castle visited, 281 ; Robert Duke
of Normandy at, 281.
Cashmore, Mr. and Mrs., receive the
Club at Norton Malreward, 74 ; 166.
Chedworth Roman Villa visited, 296;
Mr. A. T. Martin on, 296.
9
298
Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Cheddar Waited, 285; the Rev. J.
Coleman receives the Club at,
285 ; his remarks on the Church, 285 ;
paper printed, 175 ; Old House at, 285.
Cheltenham visited, 295.
Chelvey Church and Court visited, 295.
Cherhill Church visited, 81.
Chests, Old Carved, paper on, 38.
Chew Magna visited, 71 ; Mr. Wm.
Adlam on, 72 ; the family of John
Locke at, 72.
Clapton Court, Old Carved Wooden
Screen at, 288.
Clifford, Hon. and Rt. Rev. Bishop,
Presides at Inaugural Meeting, 1 ;
elected President of Club, 3; re-
elected, 79 ; 156 ; 277; 289; PresidenVs
Address 1885, 77; remarks on Col.
Bramble*s Paper on Armour, 79;
presents Testimonial to Mr. John
Reynolds, 80 ; note on Saint Wilgefort,
189 ; President's Address 1887 (abstract),
277 ; remarks on the Ancient Glass in
Cheddar Church, 285 ; at Withington,
296.
Clifford, the Hon. and Rev. Walter,
exhibits Drawings of, and describes
some Ancient Copes, 288 ; his paper
printed, 229.
Coleman, Rev. J., on Cheddar Church,
175 ; 285.
Collins, Mr., of Tewkesbury, Plans of
Saxon Buildings at Deerhurst, 82.
Compton Bishop visited, 284.
Cope from Yatton e^diibited, 82 ; paper
on, by Col. Bramble, 92.
Deerhurst, on some Architectural
Remains of the Priory Church, by
T. S. Pope, illustrated^ 18 ; notes on
the early History of, by the Rev. G.
Butterworth, 22; on the Saxon
Chapel at, by Alfred E. Hudd,
illustrated, 27 ; visited, 75 ; views
and plans of exhibited, 82.
Dowdoswell Church and Camp visited,
295.
Duke, Rev. Edw., his collection of
Antiquities visited, 164.
Dundry Church visited, 70 ; note on the
Tower, 71.
Edkins, William, elected Honorary
Member, 156.
Edwards, Job, his collection of Anti-
quities visited, 163.
Flax Bourton visited, 295.
Fox, Aldermcm F. F., elected Vice-
President, 3; re-elected, 79; 156;
Communicates paper on the Rules of
St. Stephen's Vestry, 1524, 288. (See
Ancient Bristol Documents, No. VII.).
Fry, Francis J., elected on Committee,
3 ; re-elected, 79.
Farley, Hungerford Castle visited, 158 ;
the Chapel of St. Julian, 159.
Farmboroogh, Somerset, Roman Bemaini
at, 109.
Gloucester Cathedral visited, 74.
Hinton Charterhouse visited, 158 r
Remains of the Priory, 158.
Hudd, Alfred E., elected Hon. Secretary,
3; re-elected, 79; 156; 277; 289;
note on Illustrations of Korman
Doorways, 11 ; note on Stanton Drew,
13 ; note on the Architecture of Deer-
hurst Church, 21 ; paper on the Saxon
Chapel at Deerhurst, 27, illustrated ;
plans of Roman Station at Sea MUls,
Plate VII. ; notes on Sea Mills, 60, 63;
on the Tower of Dundry Church, 71 ;
on Parclose-soreens, 74 ; on the Wans-
dyke, 80 ; exhibits plans and illustra-
tions of, and reads notes on, the Saxon
Chapel and Font at Deerhurst, 82;
note on the Stoney Littleton Long
BaiTow, 104 ; on a Romano-British
Interment at Farmborough, 109 ; 167 ;
on the Carthusian Priory at Hinton,
Somerset, 158; note on St. Julian,
159; on Old Sarum, 162; on the
Condition of the Megalithio Remains
at Stonehenge, 164 ; on the Wansdyke,
166 ; exhibits Roman Coins found near
Whitchurch, 166; paper on the Hos-
pital of St. Katherine, Bedminster, 257 ;
exhibits an Ancient Ring from South-
rop, 287 ; on the Bonhommes, 291 ; on
St. Bartholomew's Hospital, Bristol,
291 ; on Ashton Camp, 293.
Iron-work, in the West of England,
paper on.byThos.S. Pope,i{Zu5^ra^,85.
Jacques, Thos. W., on Ancient Camps near
Bristol, 167 ; at Backwell Church, 294.
Jones, W. E., on early Architecture in
England, 67; elected on Committee,
79; re-elected, 156; on St. Mark's
Church, Bristol, 291.
Kerslake, Thomas, elected Honorary
Member, 156.
King, Rev. Brian, on Avebury Church,
80,81.
Lake House, near Salisbury, visited, 164.
Latimer, John, paper on Bristol Com-
merce in the 14th and 15th Centuries,
217.
Llandaff Cathedral visited, 282 ; the Club
received by Canon Hawkins at, 282.
Maclean, Sir John, at Bristol Cathedral,
290 ; 292 ; at St. Mark's Church, 291.
Maes Knoll Camp, 12, 13 ; visited, 74 ; 165.
Martin, Alfred T., on the Roman road
from Bath to Cserwent, 58 ; 83 ; on the
Roman Villa at Wemberham, 157;
elected on Committee, 157 ; re-elected,
289 ; on the Roman Villa at Ched-
worth, 296.
Nailsea Court visited, 294.
Norris, The Ven. Archdeacon, receives
the Club at Bristol Cathedral, 279;
^t:
Index.
299
290; on the Nonnan RemainB of St.
Augustine's Abbey, 279; on the 13th
Century Remains there, 290; 298 ; at
St. Mark's Church, 291.
Norton Mabreward visited, 74 ; 165.
Norton St. Philip visited, 160.
Norwegian Wooden Churches, paper on,
illtistratedf 114.
Oakeley, Mrs. Bagnall, at Llandai!
Cathedral, 282; on the Stitches of
Ancient Church Embroidery, 238 ; 288.
Old Sarum visited, 162.
Parish Kegisters, Curiosities of, paper
on, by John Taylor, 96.
Pass, Alfred C, elected on Committee,
8; re-elected, 79; 166; 289; paper
on Becent Excavations at Silbury
Hill, with plans, 130.
Perfect, Rev. H. T., on the Megalithic
Remains at Stanton Drew, 14.
Pope, Thos. S., on the Architectural
Remains of Deerhurst Priory Church,
18 ; on Old Carved Chests, Ulustrated,
33 ; on esurly Schools of Architecture
in England, 67; at Deerhurst, 75;
on Calne Church, &c., 81; on Old
Iron-work near Bristol, illtistrated,
85; elected on Committee, 156; re-
elected, 277; paper on Old Bristol
Houses, 172 ; paper on the 13th Cen-
tury Lady Chapel of Bristol Cathe-
dral, 251 ; presents Drawings, 278 ;
reads Paper on Ancient Wood-work in
Bristol and the West of England,
with Ulustrationat 287.
Portbury Church, Camp, and Priory
visited, 82.
Reynolds, John, elected Vice-President,
8 ; re-elected, 79 ; 156 ; his " Archaeo-
logical Picnics," 77; Testimonial
presented to, 77 ; on the date of the
Tower of St. Peter's Church, Bristol,
278 ; at Bristol Cathedral, 280 ; 293.
Roman Road between Bath and Caarwent,
58 ; near Avebury, 80 ; at Withington,
295.
Roman Remains at Sea Mills, 58; at
Farmborough, Somerset, 109 ; at Cam-
erton, 113 ; Wemberham, near Yatton,
157; at Whitchurch, 165; 166; at
Dowdeswell, 295 ; at Withington, 296 ;
at Chedworth, 296.
Rowley, Prof. Jas., on Robert, Duke of
Normandy, in Cardiff Castle, 281 ; on
a French War Medal, exhibited by Mr.
Tuckett, 286.
Rules, 2 ; Alteration of, 277 ; 303.
Salisbury visited, 161 ; the Cathedral, 161.
Silbury Hill visited, 81 ; paper on recent
Excavations at, with plans, fto., 130 ;
168 ; Plates XVI. and XVII.
Stanton Drew, Dr. Beddoe on, 12 ; Rev.
H. T. Perfect on, 14 ; visited by Club,
78 ; Uhis^ated, Plates IX. and X.
Stoney Littleton Barrow, Human Re-
mains from, paper by Dr. Beddoe,
F.R.S,, 104.
Stonehenge visited, 163; a **New
Theory'* respecting the Stones, by
Mr. Algernon Warren, 163; Bishop
Clifford's Remarks on, 277.
Taylor, John, reads paper on Anglo-
Norman Doorways, 3; the same
printed, 4 ; discussion on the same,
67; elected on Committee, 79; re-
elected, 156; 277; paper on Parish
Registers, 96 ; at All Saints' Church,
Bristol, 279; at Cardiff Castle, 282;
at the Dominican Priory, Bristol, 293.
Taylor, Rev. C. S., on some Old Deeds
belonging to the Church of St. Thomas,
Bristol (Ancient Bristol Documents,
No. 4,) 151 ; Ancient Bristol Docu-
ments, Nos. 6 and 7, 193; Remarks
on, 287; on Withington Priory,
296.
Thames, the ** Seven Springs" source
of the, visited, 296.
Tewkesbury Abbey visited, 75 ; Rev.
Hemming Robeson at, 75.
Trusted, C. J., exhibits Models of Irish
Antiquities, 166.
Tuckett, F. F., Notes on Ancient
Norwegian Wooden Churches, with
some Notices of similar early structures
in Great Britain and Ireland, illus-
tratedy 114; note on St. Julian,
Hospitator, 159 ; exhibits Swedish and
Norwegian Antiquities, 167; exhibits
a curious French Medal, 286; 289;
exhibits an Old French Carved Ivory,
287 ; exhibits some fragments of
Ancient Stained Glass, 289 ; paper on
Optical Peculiarities of, 207 ; 289.
Wansdyke, the, 12, 13 ; 74 ; 80 ; 165 ;
166.
Warren, Algernon, on Stonehenge, 16 L;
at Axbridge Church, 284.
Warren, Robert Hall, exhibits 17th
Century Portraits of French Priests,
166 ; paper on the Misereres in Bristol
Cathedral, 241 ; 289 ; elected on Com-
mittee, 277 ; re-elected, 289.
Wedmore visited, 284 ; the Club received
by the Rev. A. S. Hervey at, 284;
Col. Bramble on the Church of St.
Mary at, 178 ; 284.
Wellow visited, 160; the Chambered
Tumulus at, 104.
Whitchurch visited, 165.
Williams, John, appointed to audit
Treasurer's Accounts, 156; elected
Treasurer, 277 ; re-elected, 289.
Wilton Church and House visited, 161.
Withington visited, 295.
Wooden Churches in Norway and Eng-
land, paper on, 114.
Yatton visited, 157.
3CX) Clifton Antiquarian Club.
^ocuttes(« $:t.t m Corre£(ponTieme*
-r-vo^Ovflw-v^V'v-
1. The Society of Antiquaries of London.
2. The Royal Archscological Institute.
3. The Bristol and Gloucestershire ArchoDological Society.
4. The Somersetshire Archaeological and N. Hist. Society.
6. The Monmouthshire and Caerleon Antiquarian Association.
6. The Wiltshire Archaeological and N. Hist. Society.
7. The Bath N. Hist, and Antiquarian Field Club.
8. The Cotteswold Field Club.
9. The Cambridgeshire Antiquarian Society.
10. The Clifton College Scientific Society.
1 1 . The Bristol Museum and Library.
12. The Bristol Free Library.
13. The Plymouth Free Library.
14. The Editor of *' The Western Antiquary."
15. The Exeter Free Library and Museum.
list of ilUml)e«, !l8$4-88*
Adlam, William, F.S.A., The Manor House, Chew Magna. Retired,
1887.
Almond, Joseph, Wharncliffe House, Wbiteladies Road, Bristol.
Baker, Arthur, Henbury Hill House, near Bristol.
Beddoe, John, M.D., F.R.S., Clifton. Vice-President, 1887, 8.
Blacker, Rev. B. H., M.A., 26, Meridian Place, Clifton. Comtniiiee,
1888.
Bramble, Lieut. -Col., J. R., Cleeve House, Yatton. Treasurer, 1884-6;
Vice- President, 1887, 8.
Burder, G. F., M.D., F. Met. Soc, 7, South Parade, Clifton. Committee,
1884.
Bush, John, 9, Pembroke Road, Clifton.
Cashmore, Samuel, Woodside, Portishead.
Charleton, R. A., 3, Beaufort Road, Clifton.
Clifford, The Hon. and Rt. Rev. Bishop, Clifton. President, 1884-8.
Cruddas, C. J., Oakfield, Stoke Bishop.,
-V -V «r
V /^^
List of Members, 1884-88. 301
Dallas, James, F.L.S., Exeter. Retired, 1884.
Derham, Walter, M.A., Henleaze Park, Westbury-on-Trym. Retired,
1886.
Dix, J. W. S., Hampton Lodge, Durdbam Down, Bristol.
Eberle, J. Fuller, 96, Pembroke Road, Clifton.
Edkins, William, 12, Charlotte Street, Park Street, Bristol. Hon,
Member, 1886.
Edwards, Sir George W., Sneyd Park, Bristol.
Fox, Alderman Francis F., Yate House, Chipping Sodbury. Vice-
President, 1884-6.
Fry, Francis J., Eversleigb, Leigb Woods. Committee, 1884, 5.
Fuller, John, 131, Pembroke Road, Clifton.
Gough, W. v., Compton Lodge, Hampton Road, Bristol.
Hardman, Rev. J. W., LL.D., Cadbury House, Yatton.
Havilland, General John de, York Herald^ London. Hon, Member.
Deceased, 1886.
Herapath, Howard M., Penleigh, Canynges Road, Clifton. Retired,
1887.
Hudd, Alfred E., F.S.A., Clinton House, 94, Pembroke Road, Clifton.
Hon. Secretary, 1884-8.
Hudden, W. Paul, Brockley Hall, near Bristol.
Jacques, Thomas W., The Grange, Backwell.
James, Christopher, C. E., 4, Alexandra Road, Clifton.
Jones, W. E., West View House, Westbury-on-Trym. Committee^
1884-6.
Kerslake, Thomas, Wynfrid, Clevedon. Hon, Member^ 1886-8.
Langley, J. N., LL.D., 9, Clyde Park, Redland. Retired, 1888.
Latimer, John, Trelawney Place, Cotham.
Llewellin, John, Redland Green, Bristol.
Lewis, Harold, B.A., Mercury Office^ Bristol.
Maclean, Sir John, F.S.A., Glasbury House, Richmond Hill,. Clifton.
Macliver, Lieut. Col. David, 67, Pembroke Road, Clifton. Deceased,
1888.
Martin, A. T., M.A., Clifton College ; 10^ Upper Belgrave Road.
Committee, 1887, 8.
Morgan, Professor C. Lloyd, 16, Canynge Road, Clifton.
Pass, Alfred C, Rushmere House, Upper Belgrave Road, Clifton.
Committee, 1884-6 and 1888.
Pope, Thomas S., 3, Unity Street, Bristol. Committee, 1885-7.
Prankerd, P. D., The Knoll, Sneyd Park, Bristol.
Reynolds, John, The Manor House, Redland. Vice- President ^ 1884-6.
Hon, Member, 1887, 8.
Rowley, Professor J., Ardmore, Leigh Woods.
302 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
Shaw, J. E., M-B., 11, Lansdown Place, Victoria Square, Clifton.
Spence, C. H., M.A., Clifton College.
Steven, Alexander, M.D., 6, West Mall, Clifton. Retired, 1884.
Swann, E. J., The Gables, Leigh Woods.
Swajrne, S. H., 119, Pembroke Road, Clifton.
Taylor, Rev. C. S,. 1, Guinea Street, RedclifP.
Taylor John, City Library, King Street, Bristol. Committee^ 1885-7.
Thomas, William, 7, Charlotte Street, Queen's Square, Bristol.
Tribe, W. N., Ivythorpe, Durdham Down.
Trusted, C. J. Sussex House, 127, Pembroke Road, Clifton.
Try on, Stephen, 5 Beaufort Road, Clifton.
Tuckett, Francis F.. F.R.G.S., Frenchay.
Warren, Algernon, Clifton Down Hotel, Clifton.
Warren, Robert Hall, 13 Apsley Road, Clifton. Committee^ 1887, 8.
Williams, John, 16, Alma Road, Clifton. Treasurer , 1887, 8.
4
Rules 303
%nlrs( of tl)e CItfton ^nttquartan Clui).
1. — The Society shall be called the " Clifton Antiqua.eian Club."
2. — The chief object of the Club shall be the investigation of
antiquities, especially of those in the surrounding country.
3. — ^The Club shall consist of not more than Fifty Ordinary and Ten
Honorary Members.
4. — The Officers of the Club shall be — a President, two Vice-Presi-
dents, a Treasurer, and a Secretary, all of whom shall be elected
annually from amongst the Ordinary Members.
5. — The affairs of the Club shall be managed by a Committee,
consistiDg of the Officers and four Members to be elected annually ;
three to form a quorum.
6. — Ordinary Members shall be elected at the Annual Meeting, by
ballot. Candidates must be previously nominated in writing by two
Members, and approved by the Committee : the names of all candidates
must be sent to every Member at least seven days before the Annual
Meeting. One adverse vote in ten shall be sufficient to exclude.
7. — Honorary Members shall be elected by the unanimous vote of the
Committee.
8. — ^The Committee shall have the power of inviting not more than
five gentlemen to attend any meeting of the Club.
9. — ^There shall each year be at least two excursions and two meetings
for general purposes, one of which — to be held in January — shall be the
Annual Meeting for the election of new Members and the appointment
of Officers. At least seven days' notice of all meetings shall be given
to every Member by the Secretary.
304 Clifton Antiquarian Club.
10. — Special Meetings may be called by the Committee. The Secre-
tary shall call a Special meeting within ten days of receiving a written
request to that effect, specifying the object of the meeting and signed
by not less than ten members.
1 1 . — Each Member shall give three days' notice to the Secretary of
his intention to join the excursion meetings, and he shall be at liberty
to introduce a lady, subject to the same rule as regards the notice.
The expenses of each excursion shall be defrayed by those who attend
it, or who have signified their intention to do so to the Secretary.
12. — Each Ordinary Member shaU pay an Annual Subscription of
Ten Shillings and Sixpence, which shall become due on the first day of
January in each year, and shall be paid in advance.
13. — Members whose subscriptions are in arrear for one year shall be
considered as having withdrawn from the Club, if, after application, the
same be not paid.
14. — Any Member being absent from four consecutive meetings
without explaining the cause of his absence to the satisfaction of the
Committee, shall be considered to have retired from the Club.
15. — All matters not included in the foregoing Rules shall be settled
by a majority of two -thirds of the Committee, provided that any
Member may appeal from their decision to a General Meeting of the
Club, at which votes shall be taken by the ballot.
85.88
4. WRIGHT A 00., MMTOL.
13